The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/10/93(O >7-e--;04 46g3 -1°y 'g "The person who thinks before he speaks is often silent." -Unknown AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, August 10, 1993 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Albert Wiemans MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Y. Edgerton COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Robert Essertier Kathleen Midstokke Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman INTERIM CITY MANAGER Mary C. Rooney CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. - 1 - (a) * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) • Public comments on the Consent Calendar. Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on July 13, 1993; 2) Special meeting of the City Council held on July 22, 1993; 3) Adjourned regular workshop meeting of the City Council held on July 22, 1993; 4) Regular meeting of the City Council held on July 27, 1993. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the July, 1993 month- ly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer John M. Workman dated August 4, 1993. (e) (g) Recommendation to approve an amendment) to the Joint Powers Agreement relating to the Job to Partner- ship Act (JTPA). Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated August 2, 1993. Recommendation to approve extending th agreement with the City of Redondo Beach for the join operatioof the WAVE Dial -A -Ride service. Memorandum from Planning Di- rector Michael Schubach dated August 3, 1993. Recommendation to approve ease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and ope Chapel fo space in the Community Center (Rooms 5 and 6A). Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director/Acting City Manager Mary Roo- ney dated August 2, 1993. (h) Recommendation to deny request for multi -way stop con- trol on Sixth Street at Cypress Avenue. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated August 3, 1993. (i) Recommendation to receive and file progress report on installation of computer system. Memorandum from LAN/ Systems Engineer Erik A. Rifi dated August 3, 1993. (j) Recommendation to approve letter of agreemen to extend the existing agreement wi ,h MultiVision for four month period from the set franchise expiration in order to provide the Cable TV Board additional time to review the impacts of the Cable Television Act of 1992. Memorandum from Acting City Manager Mary Rooney dated July 30, 1993. 2 (k) Recommendation to deny request for installation of mul- tiway stop controls on Prospect Aenue at 7th Street. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated August 3, 1993. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. CQRDINANCE NO. 93-1094 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORN A, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. For adoption. (ORDINANCE NO. 93-1096) - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER - OSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. For adoption, with supplemental memoran- dum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated August 5, 1993. , - (a) (b) 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Richard Sullivan dated August 1, 1993 regarding conduct at City Council meeting of July 27. Recommended action: Receive and file. HEARINGS ✓ 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO REQUIRE 17' ALA') GARAGE SETBACK AS A PART OF NONCONFORMING REMODEL AT 850 1" EIGHTH PLACE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 3, 1993. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. NONE MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. REQUEST FROM SOUTH BAY CYCLES TO AMEND A REQUIRED CONDI- TION FOR A PROPERTY LINE WALL AND LANDSCAPING WITHOUT PAYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FEES. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 20, 1993. (Continued from July 27, 1993 meeting.) 7. COMMENDED REVISION TO C TY PURCHASING PROCEDURES, with ordinance for introduction Memorandum from Acting City anager Mary Rooney dated July 19, 1993. (Continued from July 27, 1993 meeting.) 8. STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH PROJECT ENHANCEMENTS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated August 3, 1993. REPORT AND FINAL RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING COMMISSION 1,41 ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OIL DRILLING. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 4, 1993. 19. /10. CONSIDERATION OF ALLOCATING $6,000 FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. Memorandum from Acting City Manager Mary Rooney dated July 30, 1993. REPORT REGARDING LOWERING FEE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENTS AND TO REVIEW THE CATEGORIES OF USES THAT ARE SUBJE T TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, with(resolutions for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 2, 1993. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Approval of advertisement for Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission applicants. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated August 5, 1993. 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request from Mayor Wiemans for discussion of Ironman competition. (b) Request by Councilmember Benz for further discussion of emergency preparedness and development of volunteer fire corps. Memorandum from Councilmember Benz. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. CLOSED SESSION, for the purpose of Meet and Confer and Pending Litigation, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). ADJOURNMENT 4 Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas. are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the .preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. • SPREAD 045-10•(33 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on August 10, 1993, at the hour of 7:/O P.M. ********** start paged 82?? *************** PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 147- (91-AD(.5 )/ /Jo ioaDics Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: -.?"eannet Jones - XXXXX , submitted petition con- taining signatures in support of main- taining the lifeguard services in Hermosa Beach, ' OS 6k /)/52-- O )-,�- !,� /�•� ) — �. "121'6"A-,14,4 -c. ----ems- ` 2 g) ‘---11:2 45 214 -vs -i 94-,- Noy- •--,9 AAA,„ 7174-tA).--(Ale4P*4504-4-4---) c_e J ( / � ( _ity Council Minute 0-93 Page 1 i Howard Lonqacre - 1221 Seventh Place, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, �� Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, Martin Moreno - 1326 Corona Street, Marc Freeman - 1937 Palm Drive, Betty Martin - 257 27th Street, ,eMerna Marshall - 360 33rd Place, 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (k), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: ( ) and ( ) Motion , second , . So ordered. Coming forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar were: No one came forward to speak on items not removed from the con- sent calendar. City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 2 (a) (b) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on July 13, 1993; 2) Special meeting of the City Council held on July 22, 1993; 3) Adjourned regular workshop meeting of the City Council held on July 22, 1993; 4) Regular meeting of the City Council held on July 27, 1993. With a supplemental memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling, dated August 5, 1993. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 44591 through 44726 inclusive and nos. 44728 through 44809 inclusive, noting voided warrants nos. 44591, 44592, 44593, 44594, 44615, 44622, 44648, 44728, 44729, and 44761. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the July, 1993 month- ly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer John M. Workman dated August 4, 1993. Action: To receive and file the July, 1993, monthly investment report as presented. City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 3 (e) Recommendation to approve an amendment\to the Joint Powers Agreement relating to the Job Training Partner- ship Act (JTPA). Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated August 2, 1993. Action: To approve and authorize the Mayor to sign an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement 82-100 (JPA) which provides employment and training services under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and Family Economic Security Act (FESA). (f) Recommendation to approve extending the agreement•►with the City of Redondo Beach for the joint operation of the WAVE Dial -A -Ride service. Memorandum from Planning Di- rector Michael Schubach dated August 3, 1993. ,, % e 30 7 (g) Action: To approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the extension of the agreement with the City of Redondo Beach for the joint operation of the WAVE transportation service. Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel for space in the Community Center (Rooms 5 and 6A). Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director/Acting City Manager Mary Roo- ney dated August 2, 1993. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign a one-year lease agreement, from September 1, 1993 to August 31, 1994, between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Hope Chapel for rooms 5 and 6A in the Community Center at a rate of $804 per month from September 1, 1993 to June City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 4 • (0 (h) �" /�Proposed Action: To rove installation of a multi -way PP • / stop on Sixth Street t Cypress Avenue. v Motion »f, second 4). The motion failed / carried ... .›'l if!--.' `---("e? /4V1�./ //4.-4 L.roposed Action: To remove curb parking on the south tlp ��/1"‘ side of Sixth Street to improve sight lines. Motion , second . The motion carried / failed .. 30, 1994 ($.87 per sq.ft. X 924 sq.ft.) and $832 from July 1, 1994 to August 31, 1994 ($.90 per sq.ft.). Recommendation to deny request for multi -way stop con- trol on Sixth Street at Cypress Avenue. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated August 3, 1993. rt (//,/ ____=.--f, /:4 :7- 7...., "--;1 0 (,..._ (-er---e)---v 47 s.i A ----Y"' Action: To approve the staff recommendation and deny a request to install Stop Controls on Sixth Street at Cy- press Avenue. Motion , second The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of (i) Recommendation to receive and file progress report on installation of computer system. Memorandum from LAN/ Systems Engineer Erik A. Rifi dated August 3, 1993. 40�'% LAN/Systems Engineer Rifi presented the staff report and 4/1/:;:e) /responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file the progress report on the expansion of the Novell 3.11 Network to include the en- tire City Hall complex scheduled for August 13 - 15, L City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 5 (i) (k) /if //7/ fro 1993. Motion , second . So ordered. Recommendation to approve letter of agreement to extend the existing agreement with MultiVision for a four month period from the set franchise expiration in order to provide the Cable TV Board additional time to review the impacts of the Cable Television Act of 1992. Memorandum from Acting City Manager Mary Rooney dated July 30, 1993. Action: To approve the staff recommendation for a four- month extension of the existing agreement with MultiVi- sion Cable TV. Recommendation to deny request for installation of mul- tiway stop controls on Prospect enue at 7th Street. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated August 3, 1993. erZ`---C) �fr*/----"—J/` ''r °L-2-) Action: To approve the staff recommendation and deny the installation of a multi -way Stop Control on Prospect Avenue at Seventh Street. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) 'ORDINANCE NO. 93-1094+- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 6 • BEACH AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, RETIREMENT SYSTEM. For adoption. Action: To adopt Or finance No. 93-1094. Motion may, second So ordered. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1096 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. For adoption, with supplemental memoran- dum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated August 5, 1993. 0,)/71 Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 93-1096. Motion Am./, second ge>. The motion carried, dissenting votes of le Action: noting the ii 1)7 d-fe4 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(a), .... and (k) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate items. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Richard Sullivan dated August 1, 1993 regarding conduct at City Council meeting of July 27. Recommended action: Receive and file. Coming forward to address the Council were: it)/ r)�� w lye 4r-//yel. City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 7 • Action: To receive and file. Motion , second . the motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO REQUIRE 17, GARAGE SETBACK AS A PART OF NONCONFORMING REMODEL AT 850 EIGHTH PLACE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 3, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The hearing opened at i:tSP.M. Coming forward to address the Council were: Greg or Bette Tucker - 850 8th Place, owner and U- appellant, C•'` / The hearing closed at 9 : f5"' P.M. tri Action: To sustain the Planning Commission decision, deny the appeal and adopt Resolution No. 93-5¢1, enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AOF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COM- MISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FOR EXCEPTION, PURSUANT TO SECTION 13-7(b) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ALLOW AN EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUC- TURE TO EXCEED 50% OF REPLACEMENT VALUE, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT A 17 FOOT GARAGE SETBACK BE PROVIDED, AT 850 8TH PLACE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 49 TRACT NO. 8386.11 �� 5/M / C Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 8 • Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of PUBLIC HEARINGS - None MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. REQUEST FROM SOUTH BAY CYCLES TO AMEND A REQUIRED CONDI- TION FOR A PROPERTY LINE WALL AND LANDSCAPING WITHOUT PAYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FEES. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 20, 1993. (Continued from July 27, 1993 meeting.) Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Proposed Action: To receive and file the request for a waiver of fees. Motion , second . The motion carried / failed ... Proposed Action: To 7. RECOMMENDED REVISION TO CITY PURCHASING PROCEDURES, with :ordinance for introduction. Memorandum from Acting City //17-(7 City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 9 • Manager Mary Rooney dated July 19, 1993. (Continued from July 27, 1993 meeting.) Acting City Manager Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: 2/11? 74 lc) 3 Proposed Action: To approve the staff recommendation and introduce' Ordinance No. 93-1097.\ Motion , second . The motion carried / failed ... Proposed Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 93-109 , as amended Motion , second . The motion carried / failed ... Final Action: To waive further reading of,Ord_iriance.No.-t -' 93-109_ ;, ent'tled, HAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH /ex/ 8. STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH PROJECT ENHANCEMENTS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated August 3, 1993. -*#S u Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council que t nsy. 4 _1 i-�- �'' e- aY .7/ ,;),,,. City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 10 • Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: 0/e -w) Proposed Action: To /e/e-c- 9. REPORT AND FINAL RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING COMMISSION ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OIL DRILLING. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 4, 2=2- 1993. supplemental letters from Rosamond Fogg, XXXX Street, dated August 6and-1O, 1993 and a supplemental memorandum from Planni Director Schubach dated August 10, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff repot and responded to Council questions. (1,-c Coming forward to address the council on this item were: 6,9 fro 9 --„. DC -t- 9 3 - 56,4 p A;() City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 11 • Action: God only knows 10. CONSIDERATION OF ALLOCATING $6,000 FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. Memorandum from Acting City Manager Mary Rooney dated July 30, 1993. Acting City Manager Rooney presented and responded to Council questions. Na --f moo©� 47///e0,) L --t---77 e41- (11 the staff report 11. REPORT REGARDING LOWERING FEE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENTS AND TO REVIEW THE CATEGORIES OF USES THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, with resolutions for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 2, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. ✓ 3 -j-r) .711” --544 City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 12 • MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS ki;i1 I - CITY MANAGER MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL Approval of advertisement for Enhancement District Commission from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling City Clerk Doerfling presented sponded to Council questions. ,,97/ et,0 r ,a/44-6texiL 0‘ J4( Downtown Business Area applicants. Memorandum dated August 5, 1993. the staf report and re - 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request from Mayor Wiemans for discussion of Ironman competition. a_ Mayor Wiemans discussed his request. /1// �-t 'M) .� .v ;� -� z‹) !fes f � City Council Mires 08-10-93 Page 13 (b) Request by Councilmember Benz for further discussion of emergency preparedness and development of volunteer fire corps. Memorandum from Councilmember Benz. Councilmember Benz discussed his request. ds J ele ��` 2 "4S//`-.2"1" CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming tit;1/ Gi /;*64 Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. forward to address the Council at this time were: =o•� /oa ,.�. �s 2 Z '-'21,r7r r 4 —/ �. \ 2>)a-7L-7�� 4*---( 6t- V CLOSED SESSION, for the purpose of Meet and Confer and Pending Litigation, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, Californ a, adjourned on Wednesday August 11, 1993, at the hour of /O:Ay A. M. to the Regular Meeting of Tues- day, August 24, 1993, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 14 Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 08-10-93 Page 15 ACTION SHEET ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, August 10, 1993 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY JUNE WILLIAMS ROLL CALL: EDGERTON ABSENT PUBLIC PARTICIPATION JUNE WILLIAMS - OBJECTED TO CITY ALLOWING RB'S IRONMAN COMPETI- TION ON THE BEACH. JOHN MCHUGH - BENZ BEHAVIOR IS UNACCEPTABLE - ASKED FOR HIS RESIGNATION. JAN MCHUGH - SPOKE OF BENZ HUMILIATING THE CITY AND CITIZENS. IMPLORED COUNCIL TO ASK FOR BENZ'S RESIGNATION. HOWARD LONGACRE, 1221 7TH PLACE. BALLOT MEASURE ORDINANCE IS NOT WHAT WAS PROMISED THE CITIZENS WHEN THE ORDINANCE WAS ADOPTED. CRITICIZED EDGERTON AND BENZ. KATHY AND DICK MCCURDY, 1113 VALLEY DRIVE. OBJECTED TO ACTION TAKEN JULY 27 REGARDING SOUTH SCHOOL PARK. ASKED COUNCIL TO READDRESS THIS ITEM AND APPROVE CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO OBTAIN PROPOSALS TO DESIGN PHASE 1, AND OBTAIN BIDS TO DO THE WORK. CAROL HUNT, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, COMMENDED ROONEY FOR ITEM ON PURCHASING PROCEDURES. ALSO, EXPRESSED THE CHAMBER SUPPORT OF THE CITY'S FILMING POLICY. MERNA MARSHALL - THANKED COUNCIL FOR PARTICIPATING IN SISTER CITY EVENT. ALSO, CONCERNED ABOUT HOMELESS SLEEPING IN PARK AND ON GREENBELT. WOULD LIKE LAWS ENFORCED. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on July 13, 1993; 2) Special meeting of the City Council held on July 22, 1993; 3) Adjourned regular workshop meeting of the City Council held on July 22, 1993; 4) Regular meeting of the City Council held on July 27, 1993. MINUTES OF JULY 27, 1993 MEETING CONTINUED TO AUGUST 24 MTG. 1 (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the July,_ 1993 month- ly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer John M. Workman dated August 4, 1993. (e) (f) Recommendation to approve an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement relating to the Job Training Partner- ship Act (JTPA). Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated August 2, 1993. Recommendation to approve extending the agreement with the City of Redondo Beach for the joint operation of the WAVE Dial -A -Ride service. Memorandum from Planning Di- rector Michael Schubach dated August 3, 1993. PULLED BY AW. HE QUESTIONED THE LACK OF OUR NORMAL CANCELLATION CLAUSE IN AGREEMENT. SCHUBACH SAID HE WAS SURE IT WAS IN THERE. MOTION KM/RE APPROVE ON THE CONDITION THAT REGULAR CANCELLATION CLAUSE IS INCLUDED. SO ORDERED. (g) (h) Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel for space in the Community Center (Rooms 5 and 6A). Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director/Acting City Manager Mary Roo- ney dated August 2, 1993. Recommendation to deny request for multi -way stop con- trol on Sixth Street at Cypress Avenue. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated August 3, 1993. PULLED BY KM - ASKED IF POLICY CHANGE COULD BE MADE SO THAT NO COUNCIL ACTION WOULD BE NEEDED FOR THIS TYPE OF DENIAL UNLESS APPEALED BY PER- SONS REQUESTING THE STOP CONTROL. KM THINKS WE SHOULD GO AHEAD WITH INSTALLATION OF THIS STOP SIGN. MOTION KM/AW TO INSTALL BECAUSE OF POTENTIAL INCREASE IN TRAFFIC AND SAFETY CONCERNS WHEN OIL DRILLING BEGINS. 2-2 TIE (NO RE/ RB). CARRY OVER TO NEXT MEETING ON AUGUST 24. (i) Recommendation to receive and file progress report on installation of computer system. Memorandum from LAN/ Systems Engineer Erik A. Rifi dated August 3, 1993. PULLED BY AW - SAID HE DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE TECHNICAL LANGUAGE. RE SAID THE SUBCOMMITTEE WOULD BE MEETING WITH ERIK RIFI. MOTION RE TO RECEIVE AND FILE. OK 3-0-1 (AW -ABSTAIN) (j) Recommendation to approve letter of agreement to extend the existing agreement with MultiVision for a four month (k) period from the set franchise expiration in order to provide the Cable TV Board additional time to review the impacts of the Cable Television Act of 1992. Memorandum from Acting City Manager Mary Rooney dated July 30, 1993. Recommendation to deny request for installation of mul- tiway stop controls on Prospect Avenue at 7th Street. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated August 3, 1993. PULLED BY KM - IN FAVOR OF PUTTING IN THIS STOP SIGN. MOTION KM/AW TO INSTALL THIS SIGN. OK 3-1 (RB -NO). 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1094 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. For adoption. MOTION RE/RB TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 93-1094. SO ORDERED. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1096 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. For adoption, with supplemental memoran- dum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated August 5, 1993. MOTION RE TO ADOPT WITH CHANGES AS FOLLOWS: DELETE "AND CONTROL" FROM LINES 8 & 9 ON PAGE 2, AND CHANGE THE WORD "CURRENT" TO "FORMER" ON PAGE 4, LINE 21. SECOND RB. OK 3-1 (KM -NO) 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Richard Sullivan dated August 1, 1993. regarding conduct at City Council meeting of July 27. Recommended action: Receive and file. MOTION TO DISCUSS WITH ITEM 14A. HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO REQUIRE 17' GARAGE SETBACK AS A PART OF NONCONFORMING REMODEL AT 850 EIGHTH PLACE. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 3, 1993. JACK WOOD REPRESENTED THE APPLICANTS. MOTION RE/SUSTAIN DECISION BY P.C. SECOND KM. KM WITHDREW HER SECOND. MOTION KM TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OVERTURNING P.C. DECISION AND DELETING CONDITION THAT 17 FT. SETBACK BE REQUIRED. SECOND RB. OK 3-1 (RE -NO) PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 93- 1097 FOR SIGNATURE OF MAYOR. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. NONE MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. REQUEST FROM SOUTH BAY CYCLES TO AMEND A REQUIRED CONDI- TION FOR A PROPERTY LINE WALL AND LANDSCAPING WITHOUT PAYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FEES. Memoran- dum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 20, 1993. (Continued from July 27, 1993 meeting.) MOTION TO TAKE UP THIS ITEM FOLLOWING ITEM 11 ON C.U.P. AMENDMENT FEES. SO ORDERED. 7. RECOMMENDED REVISION TO CITY PURCHASING PROCEDURES, with ordinance for introduction. Memorandum from Acting City Manager Mary Rooney dated July 19, 1993. (Continued from July 27, 1993 meeting.) MOTION RE TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 93-1097 SUPPORTING STAFF REC. SECOND KM. OK 3-1 (AW -NO). 8. STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH PROJECT ENHANCEMENTS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated August 3, 1993. MOTION RE/RB TO APPROVE ALL REC. EXCEPT FLASHING LIGHTS AND ANY MONEY LEFT OVER BE USED TO BEAUTIFY AREA AT 24TH ST. MOTION RE/RB TO APPROVE IN CONCEPT STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1,2,3, EXCLUDING ITEM 1C. RE INCLUDE IN MOTION TO RENEGOTIATE THE COST OF THE TRUCK FOR INSPECTIONS. SO ORDERED. 9. REPORT AND FINAL RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING COMMISSION ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OIL DRILLING. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 4, 1993. MOTION RB/AW TO ADOPT RESO. 93-5633 PER STAFF RECOMMENDED CHANGES. KM DOES NOT SUPPORT THE FURTHER CHANGES. FEELS WE SHOULD GO THE SAFER ROUTE OF A SUPPLEMENTAL EIR. OK 3-1 (KM -NO) 10. CONSIDERATION OF ALLOCATING $6,000 FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. 4 Memorandum from Acting City Manager Mary Rooney dated July 30, 1993. MOTION KM/AW TO APPROVE STAFF REC. OK 3-1 (RE -NO). 11. REPORT REGARDING LOWERING FEE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENTS AND TO REVIEW THE CATEGORIES OF USES THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, with resolutions for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 2, 1993. MOTION KM TO APPROVE STAFF REC. NO. 1 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 93-5634. SO ORDERED. MOTION KM TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT NO. 93-5635 TO INITIATE A STUDY OF THE LIST OF USES THAT REQUIRE A C.U.P. SECOND RE. SO ORDERED. AGENDA ITEM #6: MOTION KM/RE TO ALLOW SOUTH BAY CYCLES TO PAY THE NEW LOWER FEE FOR THEIR C.U.P. AMENDMENT. SO ORDERED. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER MARY ANNOUNCED THE LIBRARY WILL BE OPEN TWO DAYS A WEEK. CONGRATULATIONS RE. LIFEGUARD CHAMPIONSHIPS. RE. MICROPHONES PW DIRECTOR GOING TO COME BACK WITH SOME EQUIP- MENT RECOMMENDATIONS. AW ASKED FOR A REPORT ON LIFEGUARD MEETING TODAY. RE GAVE REPORT. SAID COUNTY WOULD BE AGREEABLE TO HEARING A PRO- POSAL FROM CITY ON WHAT CAN BE DONE. NEED TO ASK FOR AN EXTEN- SION OF SEPT. DEADLINE SEPT. 7. KM WOULD LIKE IT AGENDIZED FOR NEXT MEETING. WE NEED TO ACT COL- LECTIVELY AS A COUNCIL. RE SAID C.M. COULD DRAFT A LETTER SAYING THE ISSUE WILL BE AGEN- DIZED NEXT MEETING. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Approval of advertisement for Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission applicants. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated August 5, 1993. MOTION KM FOR 3 4 -YEAR TERMS AND 2 2 -YEAR TERMS AND TO ABBREVIATE THE ADVERTISEMENT SOMEWHAT. SECOND RE. SO ORDERED. MOTION RE/RB TO SET A DATE TO INTERVIEW. 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. (a) Request from Mayor Wiemans for discussion of Ironman competition. COMBINED ITEM 4A WITH THIS ITEM. MOTION KM/AW TO REQUEST INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED RE. LAST IRON - MAN CONTEST AND A LIST OF ANY LAWS THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN VIOLATED AND REPORT BACK. FAILS 2-2 (RE/RB-NO). (b) Request by Councilmember Benz for further discussion of emergency preparedness and development of volunteer fire corps. Memorandum from Councilmember Benz. DIRECT STAFF TO LOOK AT AND POSSIBLY ACQUIRE SOME EMERGENCY PUMP CAPABILITY IN THIS TOWN. WHEN EARTHQUAKES OCCUR IS WATER PRESSURE LOST AND AT WHAT RICHTER SCALE MEASUREMENT IS THIS LIKELY. ARE THERE OTHER USES FOR PUMPERS. ESTIMATED CAPITAL COSTS, TRAINING COSTS, MAINTENANCE COSTS, HOSE COSTS, ETC. RE IN FAVOR OF RESEARCHING THIS FURTHER. REFER TO FIRE DEPT. AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. AND HAVE THEM MAKE COMMENTS ABOUT HIS MEMO OUTLINE. PHIL PENNINGTON - 1600 ARDMORE - THIS PROPOSAL IS CRITICAL AND VERY SERIOUS. SHOULD BE LOOKED AT CAREFULLY. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. JEANETTE JONES, 2446 PALM DRIVE, H.B. SUBMITTED OVER 600 LETTERS IN FAVOR OF LIFEGUARDS. CLOSED SESSION, for the purpose of Meet and Confer and Pending Litigation, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). ADJOURNMENT AT 10:22 P.M. CATHERINE & DICK McCURDY August 10, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Dear Mayor and Council Members: We would like to express our objection to your recent (July 27th) decision to just "throw grass and sprinklers" on the South School site without the benefit of a fully designed and approved park plan. We respectfully request that you delay any implementation of your ordered action until you can re -address this issue at a future council meeting. It appears your decision was made contrary to the recommendation of your Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and to the recom- mendations and suggestions of staff. The conceptual plan submitted to the Council was embraced by the aforementioned entities and also local citizens during Public Hearings, and yet it still has not been approved by your body. We do recognize the shortage of available funds to complete this project as conceptionalized, however, I'm sure you agree that the presently allocated and available funding will provide far more park for our citizens than just "grass and irrigation". The question to be answered is, "What will it cost to properly seed and irrigate the East end of the park?" The word properly means consistent with the conceptual plan and therefore our long-term needs. Consequently, we request that the Council first approve the conceptual plan as submitted by staff, authorize staff to obtain proposals to design the Phase I "grass and irrigation" and then to obtain bids to do the actual work specified. To use an analogy to emphasize our point, we ask you to imagine the South School site as your own residential property and you are planning to build a house on it. Suddenly you find out you don't have enough money in the bank to complete the construction. Would you scrap the design phase and just go forward and build a foundation, or a garage, or landscape? I think not!!! You' would perhaps scale down the size of the house or decide to grade the land or build it in phases or possibly delay all construction, but under no circumstances would you start any work or actually build any portion of your home without a complete set of architectural plans. Not only would you not be allowed to by the City, but you wouldn't want to take the chance on building something which would probably have to be changed at a later date. 1113 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 - 310/374-4072 Please also recognize that by eliminating the design phase of this project, you will be potentially limiting future funding opportunities which could come from grants. Again, it is our understanding that in order to even apply for grants, a concise plan must be presented so a project's merits can be properly evaluated. Please do not ask the citizens of this community to accept a park built with what appears to be strictly a short term marginal or "band aid" type approach. One which completely ignores long term total costs, especially if future regrading and changes in irrigation should be required when the final plan is designed. We can't afford to waste $1.00. If we do not design the park before we dig that first shovel full of dirt, we stand a very good chance of potentially wasting taxpayers' funds. Sincerely yours, Cathy McCurdy MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on July 13, 1993, at the hour of 7:12 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans Absent: None PROCLAMATION - Parks and Recreation Month, July, 1993 Mayor Wiemans read the proclamation, declared the month of July, 1993 as Parks and Recreation month and urged all citizens to use and enjoy the City parks. ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Wiemans announced that tonight was the first meeting for Mary Rooney in her capacity as Interim City Manager and wished her well in the new endeavor. INTRODUCTION OF NEW PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MS. AMY AMIRANI Interim City Manager Mary Rooney introduced the new Public Works Director, Amy Amirani, formerly with the City of Irvine. Ms. Amirani thanked the City Manager and City Council, said she had 13 years experience in both the public and private spheres of her work and looked forward to the challenges of her new position. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES TO RETIRING EMPLOYEES: Rachel Gaines, Public Works Department - Personnel Di- rector Robert Blackwood was joined by Mayor Wiemans and Interim City Manager Rooney in presenting a plaque of appreciation to retiring employee Rachel Gaines, in recognition of her 35 years of service to the City and thanked her for a job well done. Ms. Gaines thanked everyone. Terry L. Rose, Community Services Department - Personnel Director Blackwood said Terry Rose could not be here tonight but would be presented a plaque of appreciation in recognition of his 14 years of service to the City. PRESENTATION OF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE "1993-94 PROGRAM OF WORK" BY CHAMBER PRESIDENT WARREN BARR, O.D. - Newly elected Chamber of Commerce President Warren Barr briefly explained the Chamber's program for 1993-94 and presented a summary of the organizational structure to the Council. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Rosemary O'Malley - 3330 The Strand, urged the Council to halt the proposed filming of the T.V. series episode for "Beverly Hills 90210", scheduled for July 15, 1993 at 3500 The Strand; Patti Stolkin Archuletta - 2005 Elm, Manhattan City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8209 laC.) Beach, representing the California Film In- stitute, spoke of the economic benefits of keeping filming in California, submitted information; Eleanor Phinney - 3411 Hermosa Avenue, expressed concerns regarding parking problems created by film crews; James Hamilton - 3417 Hermosa Avenue, agreed to make his presentation against the proposed filming of "Beverly Hills 90210" when the item came before the Council later in the meeting; Jim Bell - 3500 The Strand, owner of property to be used in filming, said the people he had con- tacted in the area had been very enthusiastic about the project; Sherman Phinney - 3411 Hermosa Avenue, was opposed to the filming due to concern regarding poten- tial parking problems; and, Richard Clark - Pacific Coast Highway, questioned if item 8 would be continued as recommended by staff. Mayor Wiemans responded that items 7 and 8 would be con- tinued to the meeting of July 27, 1993. At this time the order of the agenda was suspended to open the public hearings on item 7, and then item 8, for testimony from members of the public that would not be able to attend that meeting. As no one came forward at this time, the public hearings were continued to July 27, but they are shown in order for clarity. The order of the agenda was returned to item 1. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (1), with the exception of the following item which was removed for discussion in item 3, but is shown in order for clarity: (j) Mayor Wiemans (at the request of Parker Herriott). In addition, Councilmember Midstokke registered an abstention on item 1(a)(3) due to being absent from that meeting. Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. So ordered. No one came forward to speak on items not removed from the con- sent calendar. At 7:34 the order of the agenda was suspended to go to item 5. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on June 3, 1993; 2) Adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on June 10, 1993; 3) Regular meeting of the City Council held on June 22, 1993. City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8210 (b) Action: To approve the minutes of the adjourned regular meetings of June 3, 1993 and June 10, 1993 as presented and to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of June 22, 1993 as presented, noting the abstention of Midstokke, due to her absence from the meeting. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 44350 through 44428 inclusive and Nos. 44430 through 44489 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 44355, 44356, 44357, 44358, 44359, 44360, 44388, 44430, 44431, 44456, 44457, 44467, and 44488. And, to approve cancellation of certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) (e) (t) (g) Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and,file the June, 1993 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer John M. Workman dated July 6, 1993. Action: To receive and file the June, 1993 investment report as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the May, 1993 City Treasurer's report. (Continued from the June 22, 1993 meeting.) Action: To receive and file the May, 1993 City Treasurer's report as presented. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #22156 for a two -unit condominium at 829 15th Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 6, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5617, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #22156 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 829 15TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to adopt a resolution finding the City to be in compliance with the 1992 Congestion Management Program and approving the CMP Conformance Checklist. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 6, 1993. City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8211 (h) (i) (i) (k) Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5618, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1992 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND APPROVING THE CMP CONFORMANCE CHECKLIST." Recommendation to adopt resolution authorizing installa- tion of STOP controls on Ozone Court at 26th Street. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 1, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5619, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CREATING A STOP INTERSECTION ON OZONE COURT AT 26TH STREET AS HEREIN SET FORTH." Recommendation to adopt resolution approving the ap- plication for discretionary regional funds for the con- struction of the pedestrian signal at Hermosa View School on Prospect Avenue. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated June 29, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5620, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUNDS UNDER SB 821 AND APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF ITS BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN PLAN." Recommendation to adopt a resolution to be included in the City's Prop A application packet to be submitted in order to collect the one time per parcel allocation of $219,729 to be used for South School Park construction. Memorandum from Community Resources Director/Acting City Manager Mary Rooney dated July 1, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Wiemans at the request of Parker Herriott for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the regular meeting of July 17, 1993. Recommendation to approve request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointment of one Community Services Of- ficer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated July 7, 1993. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to extend for 30 days the temporary appointment of one Community Services Officer. (1) Recommendation to approve the revised contract for public noticing services from Ownership Listing Service. City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8212 Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 7, 1993. Action: To approve the extension of the current con- tract with Cathy McDermott of Ownership listing Service of Temecula, California for legal noticing for a period of three years as amended to include: 1) an increase for the 1st notice from $218 to $225 for the base rate and an additional $.33 for each notice exceeding 400; 2) an increase for the 2nd notice (appeal) of 15%, from $104 to $120 if the notices exceed 400 and an additional $.33 for each notice thereafter; 3) a cost of postage increase (if applicable); and, 4) payment within seven working days after receipt of invoice. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (a) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DIS- TRICT COMMISSION AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. For waiver of full reading and introduction. (Continued from June 22, 1993 meeting.) Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, to continue this item to the regular meet- ing of July 27, 1993. (b) RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. For adoption. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated July 6, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution of Intent No. 93-5623, en- titled, HA RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMEND- MENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH."" Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. (c) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PERS) AUTHORIZING SECTION 20930.3 - MILITARY SERVICE CREDIT FOR LOCAL FIRE MEMBERS ONLY. For waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed July 6, 1993. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 93-1094. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8213 Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 93-1094, entitled, *AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CON- TRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans NOES: None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(j) was continued at this time but is shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (a) Memorandum from Planning re. public warning system for hazardous ocean/pollution situations. Recommended Ac- tion: To receive and file. Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, to continue this item to the regular meet- ing of July 27, 1993. (b) Letter from James A. Hamilton, 3417 Hermosa Avenue, dat- ed July 6, 1993 opposing issuance of film permit for a television production at 3500 Strand; with memorandum of response from Interim City Manager Mary Rooney. Sup- plemental letter from James Hamilton received July 12, 1993. Supplemental letter from John Trivers, 3323 Strand, received July 13, 1993. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: James Hamilton - 3417 Hermosa Avenue, spoke of a previous film production that had been very disruptive to the neighborhood; said residents in the area objected and the filming should not be allowed to commence; said the film permit violated City Codes regarding commercial ac- tivity in an R-1 area; asked the Council to instigate a new policy for film permits that would require all residents to be contacted prior to granting a permit; and said if filming were not stopped by the Council, he would file a Writ of Mandate to stop the filming; Brian O'Malley - 3300 The Strand, showed a large chart and said he had contacted all of the residents shown; said the majority did not want City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8214 the filming to commence; submitted a petition containing 64 signatures to Council; Gail Patterson - said there was a need to keep filming in the state for the revenue base; Paul Waigner - Producer, said this was an Aaron Spelling production that had a very fine reputation as being a good neighbor when film- ing on location and much different than a pro- duction company that came in for a one day filming and never expected to return to the location again; stressed the letters of recom- mendation from other locations; and, Jean Henly - Location Manager for filming, said she had tried very hard to find a location in Her- mosa Beach as she understood the City needed revenue and would be receptive to filming. Action: To receive and file. Motion Benz, second Essertier. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Mayor Wiemans. (c) Letter from Parker Herriott, 224 24th St., dated July 6, 1993 requesting reconsideration of decision regarding partial landscaping of Biltmore site. Recommended Ac- tion: to receive and file and refer to City Attorney. Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, to continue this item to the regular meet- ing of July 27, 1993. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. A. APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OIL DEVELOP- MENT AT THE CITY YARD, 555 6TH STREET, AND OIL PIPELINE FROM 6TH STREET SOUTH TO HERONDO STREET ON VALLEY DRIVE. B. TEXT AMENDMENT TO OIL CODE RE. GRADE DEFINITION AND SETBACKS FOR PERIMETER FENCING ON A DRILL SITE, AND TO ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING FENCING ON A DRILL SITE, AND TO ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING FENCING AND BARBED WIRE REQUIREMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH OIL DEVELOPMENT. C. ADDENDA TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE OIL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION FROM AN URBAN DRILL SITE: i) TEMPORARY CITY YARD; ii) DEPTH OF BASIN AND HEIGHT OF TANKS; iii) FENCING; iv) PERIMETER LANDSCAPING. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated July 6, 1993. Supplemental letters from 22 people' in favor of oil and one against oil have been received. City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8215 Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Assistant City At- torney Ed Lee and Leonard Brock, oil consultant for the City, also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:42 P.M. Coming forward to ad- dress the Council on this item were: Don Macpherson - Macpherson Oil, owner and appel- lant, gave a brief review of nine years of per- mits for the project; said there was a contract in 1986, it had taken four years for the City certified E.I.R.; said he agreed to the original conditions in the C.U.P. but objected to additions placed on by the Planning Commis- sion; gave his estimates on the money that could be received by the City, School District and the homeowners; Jan Chattan-Brown - "Stop Oil", said she had sent a letter; said it was inappropriate to approve the C.U.P. tonight; said the increase from one acre to 1.6 acres violated Prop "P"; said under State C.E.Q.A. requirements a new City cer- tified E.I.R. was needed; said the City's liability was greater than $50,000; George Hardisty - 52 Sixth Street, spoke in support of Macpherson and oil drilling; Rosamond Fogg - 610 Sixth Street, submitted infor- mation; questioned Macpherson's influence and experience in actually drilling for oil; said he had only formed limited partnerships pre- viously; asked that no C.U.P. be granted until more information is received concerning poten- tial problems; J.R. Reviczky - 600 Ardmore, asked the Council to get all the facts before making a decision; George Weart - 540 First Street, submitted petition against oil project; spoke in opposition to drilling; Neil Gretsky - 834 Bard Street, said Macpherson's estimates of money to be received by City and others was much too high; Betty Evans - 1769 Valley Park Avenue, asked the Council to take its time and not jump into anything; Scott Alden - 646 Sixth Street, asked the Council to deny the C.U.P.; spoke of health dangers to residents, drilling noise, traffic problems and loss df property values; John Granacki - 805 Bard Street, said any revenue from drilling would benefit the leaseholders, not the residents or the owners, since most owners did not own the sub -surface mineral rights; asked the Council to evaluate the hazards and risks; said he would not have bought his home if he had known of oil City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8216 drilling; Bob Contra - 602 Ardmore, said he lived 120 feet from the drilling site, that he had purchased his home in November and did not know of the proposed oil drilling; asked the Council to think of the children and the possible health hazards to them; Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, said the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission are used in other cities; asked the Council not to alter or remove those conditions; said a new E.I.R. was needed as the project had been altered; asked that the City have an independent economic analysis done; submitted information; Nancy Reviczky - 600 Ardmore, spoke of the poten- tial health hazards of being near oil drilling for pregnant women; submitted information; Keith Edwards - 729 Eighth Place, said there should be a statute of limitations on the project and the contract as most of the people in the area of the project were not there when it had started; Mary Ann Boyle - 142 Monterey Blvd., spoke in op- position to the oil drilling; said that Prop "P" had passed with only 52% of the vote; Eric Alden - 646 Sixth Street, (child) spoke of the pollution that would be caused; Evelyn Granacki - 805 Bard Street, questioned the City's ability to enforce the controls on the project; Florence Sacks - 225 Valley Drive, read the remainder of Rosamond Fogg's letter; questioned what would happen to the limited partnership if Macpherson did not drill; questioned the City's liability and the cost of litigation; said Mac- pherson could assign the lease and leave the City with the liability for the limited partners; Karen Spice - 602 Ardmore, spoke on the health hazards to children with asthma; submitted information; Beth Harris - 416 Monterey Blvd., questioned where the Tidelands oil money went and how it could be spent; Mike Stoner - 545 25th Street, said an employee of the State Division of Oil and Gas said there was no longer any uplands oil, only tidelands oil; laid the E.I.R. does not respond to busi- ness concerns in the area; said Bank of America will not hold a deed of trust next to oil dril- ling, therefore it would be very hard to sell property; questioned if the Prop 65 carcinogen disclosure had been made for crude oil; Phil Wagner - 601 First Street, submitted a peti- tion against the project; asked the Council to City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8217 make Macpherson adhere to the conditions im- posed by the Planning Commission; Phil Dowsing - Redondo Beach, said the C.U.P. should not be approved; said there was a prob- lem with excessive vibrations from drilling, spillage in the City Yard could cause a threat to health and safety; said property protection through a trust account was needed; George Sacks - 225 Valley Drive, said the citizens concerns were not answered in the E.I.R.; said Redondo Beach has multi-million dollar litiga- tion in regard to its oil drilling project; said the proposed water injection (to alleviate subsidence) has caused earthquakes (female - name indistinct) - 215 Manhattan Avenue, read a letter regarding increased earthquake danger from water injection to prevent subsidence; John Edwards - 501 Herondo, said the draft risk assessment was inadequate; the City needs more information for a more comprehensive risk anal- ysis; submitted information; Larry Cole - 501 Herondo, said there was a litany of problems already, with more problems arising at every meeting; questioned the point in put- ting a massive industrial complex in the center of town to improve the quality of life; asked the Council to cut its losses or, at the least, to support the Planning Commission imposed conditions; Brenda Schultz - asked the Council to deny the per- mit; said Macpherson's general partner was selling -off and going out of business; Richard Baker - Division Manager of Gas and Oil, said he had no vested interest in the outcome of this hearing, but wished to correct two statements attributed to someone in his depart- ment regarding "no upland oil" and "the produc- tion would be 97% water"; said there was upland oil and had no idea until wells were drilled what the percentage of water would be; Mike Costello - 316 Monterey Blvd., said there were more and more objections to the project; con- cerned with the City's legal liability; Charles Fogg - 610 Sixth Street, objected to the project; said there was no way to mitigate the smell; Mike Schurtz - (address not given), asked the Council to deny the project or keep the condi- tions imposed by the Planning Commission; Don Macpherson - appellant, made closing remarks, said all of the questions had been addressed; said money from royalties from uplands oil would go to the City's General Fund and money from Tidelands oil would go 64% to a restricted City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8218 Trust Account and 36% to the City's General Fund; called upon consultants to respond to questions raised by Council concerning vibra- tions, contamination, Prop 65, and subsidence and earthquake danger; said there was no truth in the suggestion that G.L.G., the general partner, was going out of business; David Gautschy - project manager, Macpherson Oil Co., said there had been no complaints of vibrations in Huntington Beach, that the oil company had filed the reports and that is why they were in the files; said the project would be self-contained with little danger of con- tamination; said he could not specifically ad- dress the question of Prop 65 disclosure at this time; and that the site in Colorado was the only case known where injection of water had been linked to earthquake, the soil here was completely different and it would be the water taken out that would be used for injection. Martha Brock - said she ran independent analysis to extrapolate the amount of benzene to come from the drilling site, said it was under the AQMD limits; and, John Van Houten - P.E. in acoustics, said drilling site does not create vibrations as the equip- ment was isolated. The public hearing closed at 10:19 P.M. Assistant City Attorney Ed Lee asked the Council to re- cess to a closed session for the discussion of matters of potential litigation: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b). The meeting recessed at 10:20 P.M. to a closed session. The closed session adjourned at 10:40 P.M. and the meeting reconvened at 10:44 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation: A. To grant the appeal and to adopt staff alternate Resolution No. 93-5621, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CAL- IFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OIL DEVELOPMENT AT THE CITY MAINTENANCE YARD, 555 6TH STREET, AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN OIL PIPELINE ALONG VALLEY DRIVE FROM SIXTH STREET SOUTH TO HERONDO STREET.", amended as follows: 1) Add definition of "emergency" as outlined in the July 12 supplemental memorandum from Direc- tor Schubach (Section 14.I.); 2) Add notification requirement for emergency situations (Section 14.II.); 3) Add a finding (E.) that Council reviewed the City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8219 Final EIR addenda; 4) Revise Section 1, Item 2., line 3, by changing the phrase "shall be fined" to "shall be sub- ject to a fine"; 5) Revise Section 12, Items 6 and 7, by deleting the phrase "except in an emergency"; 6) Add language to conditions with exceptions for emergencies to reflect that the emergency must be reported to the City; B. To introduce Ordinance No. 1092 and Ordinance No. 92-1093; and C. To approve the addenda to the Environmental Impact Report, as amended to include a new description of the project site (now a 1.345 acre site). Motion Benz, second Mayor Wiemans. Amendment to Main Motion: To require from the permittee a $50,000 up -front cash deposit to be used in the event of litigation (Section 15.4.b.). Motion Edgerton, second Midstokke. The motion to amend the main motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. The main motion, as amended, carried, noting the dis- senting vote of Midstokke. Further Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 93-1092, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, SECTION 1215(4) AND (5) TO PERMIT BARBED WIRE AND CHAIN LINK FENCING FOR TEMPORARY PERIODS IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN APPROVED OIL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT." Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Essertier. AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans NOES: None Further Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 93-1093, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE OIL CODE, REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF GRADE AND TO AMEND SECTION 21A -2.9(c) TO ALLOW FENCING LESS THAN 5 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE." Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Essertier. AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemant NOES: None Final Action: To not refer the matter back to the Plan- ning Commission for review. Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Midstokke. City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8220 The order of the agenda was returned to item 2. 6. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE DIS- TRICT. With Ordinance for waiver of full reading and introduction. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated June 21, 1993. The public hearing opened at 12:32 A.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing was closed at 12:32 A.M. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 93-1095, which con- firms the Crossing Guard Maintenance District 1993-94; levies an assessment. of $5.05 per dwelling unit; and orders certain services to be furnished and maintained. Motion Essertier, second Benz. So ordered. Further Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 93-1095, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATED MAY 18, 1993, PREPARED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 93-5593 AND APPROVED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 92-5607 OF SAID COUNCIL, THE MAP AND ASSESSMENT CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT, ORDERING CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1993." Motion Essertier, second Benz. AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans NOES: None Final Action: To adopt the fiscal year 1993-94 esti- mated revenue in the amount of $54,681. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. 7. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIS- TRICT. With Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated June 21, 1993. The public hearing opened at 12:33 A.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing was closed at 12:33 A.M. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5622, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING MAP OF SAID DISTRICT, AS- SESSMENTS AND" LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1993.", which confirms the Street Lighting District 1993-94 and levies an assessment of $16.84 per dwelling unit for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1993. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Wiemans. So ordered. City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8221 Final Action: To adopt the fiscal year 1993-94 esti- mated revenue in the amount of $182,343. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. 8. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO "SMOKING POLLUTION CONTROL" OR- DINANCE. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated July 7, 1993. (Recommendation: to open public hearing and continue to July 27, 1993 meeting.) Supplemental petition from Alano Club, received July 13, 1993. The public hearing was opened at 7:29 P.M. As no one who would not be present at the next meeting came forward to address the Council, the public hearing was continued to the regular meeting of July 27, 1993. 9. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FANTASY ARCADE, 544 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated July 7, 1993, with Resolution for adoption. (Recommendation: to open public hearing and continue to July 27, 1993 meeting.) The public hearing was opened at 7:29 P.M. As no one who would not be present at the next meeting came forward to address the Council, the public hearing was continued to the regular meeting of July 27, 1993. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 10. FINAL APPROVAL OF BALLOT MEASURES AND OTHER RELATED IS- SUES CONCERNING THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, NOVEM- BER, 1993. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated June 29, 1993. City Clerk Doerfling responded to Council questions. Action: To delete consideration of a measure proposing "clean-up" amendments to the Civil Service Ordinance. Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered. Further Action: To delete consideration of an advisory measure on constructing a separate path on the west side of the Strand. Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered. Further Action: To approve placing the R-3 and R -P height issue on the ballot as a mandatory measure. Motion Edgerton, second Midstokke. So ordered, noting the objection of Essertier. Further Action: To approve wording for the ballot mea- sure, with the word "proposed" inserted in front of the word "Ordinance" in the ballot question, to read: "AMENDMENT OF ZONING ORDINANCE INCREASING THE STANDARD City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8222 1 ZONES - Shall the pro - standard height limit R-3 and R -P zones be HEIGHT LIMIT IN THE R-3 AND R -P posed Ordinance increasing the from 30 feet to 35 feet in adopted?" Motion Edgerton, second Benz. objection of Mayor Wiemans. Further Action: To authorize Councilmember Edgerton to write the argument in favor and Mayor Wiemans to write the argument against the height limit measure, with the understanding that any Councilmember was invited to ad- ditionally sign either argument. This action was di- rected by Mayor Wiemans with the consensus of the Council. So ordered, noting the Further Action: To continue the matter of providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for the measure until it has been determined whether or not translations would be required. This action was directed by Mayor Wiemans with the consensus of the Council. Further Action: partial Analysis Attorney. Motion Midstokke, To approve the preparation of an Im- of the ballot measure by the City second Essertier. So ordered. Final Action: To approve resolving a tie vote for the office of City Council Member by lot. Motion Essertier, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Mayor Wiemans. 11. RECOMMENDATION TO DENY REQUEST TO REMOVE NO STOPPING ANYTIME ZONE ON AUBREY COURT AND REPLACING IT WITH TIME LIMIT PARKING. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated July 1, 1993. Supplemental letter from Ray Petty, Mike Herman, Gerry Lowe, and Richard Weber of Allstate Insurance, 1100 Pacific Coast Highway, received July 12, 1993. Supplemental letter from Dr. Timothy M. Stackis, 1100 Pacific Coast Highway, received July 13, 1993. Public Works Director Amirani responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Roger Bacon - 1100 Pacific Coast Highway, spoke on the need for parking, especially for unloading purposes, in that area; submitted material di- rectly to the Council. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to deny the request to remove the no stopping anytime zone on Aubrey Court. City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8223 Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Mayor Wiemans. Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Coun- cil, that the City Engineer study other streets with similar conditions such as Ocean and Owosso. 12. REQUEST TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL CIVIL SERVICE REVIEW OF CLASS SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CODE ENFORCEMENT DIRECTOR AND CITY PLANNER. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated July 6, 1993. Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, to continue this item to the regular meet- ing of July 27, 1993. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER Interim City Manager Rooney reported the County had an- nounced the closing of the Hermosa Beach Branch Library. Proposed Action: To write a letter to Supervisor Deane Dana asking that the Library not be closed. Motion Edgerton. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To direct staff to take whatever action is deemed appropriate to object to the proposed closing of the Library, as it has a very high usage. Motion Midstokke, second Benz. So ordered. Interim City Manager Rooney reported on AB 409, which takes Parking Citations out of the Court system and ex- plained the new procedure for appealing tickets. 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies - Boards and Commissions Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission - 3 four-year terms ending June 30, 1997. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 6, 1993. Action: To appoint Dani Peirce to a four-year term on the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission that will expire on June 30, 1997. Motion Essertiek, second Midstokke. So ordered. Proposed Action: To appoint Patricia Egerer to a four- year term on the Parks, Recreation and Community Resour- ces Advisory Commission that will expire on June 30, 1997. Motion Mayor Wiemans. The motion died due to the lack of a second. City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8224 Action: To appoint R. Brian Mitchell to a four-year term on the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission that will expire on June 30, 1997. Motion Midstokke, second Benz. So ordered. Action: To appoint Brad Koppel to a four-year term on the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission that will expire on June 30, 1997. Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. So ordered. 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of emergen- cy preparedness. Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the regular meeting of July 27, 1993. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, July 14, 1993, at the hour of 1:12 A.M. to a closed session on Thursday, July 22, 1993 at the hour of 6:30 P.M., for the purpose of dis- cussing matters of potential litigation: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b), with the Adjourned Regular Meeting for the purpose of a workshop meeting with the Planning Commission to follow at the hour of 7:00 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 07-13-93 Page 8225 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, called by Mayor Wiemans, and held on Thursday, July 22, 1993, at the hour of 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Edgerton, Essertier, Mayor Wiemans Absent: Benz (arrived at 6:07 p.m.), Midstokke FINAL APPROVAL OF BALLOT MEASURES AND OTHER RELATED ISSUES CONCERNING THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, NOVEMBER 2, 1993. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated July 15, 1993. City Clerk Doerfling reviewed the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Vose also responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To place the R-3 and R -P height issue on the ballot as an advisory rather than a mandatory measure, to be worded as follows: ADVISORY VOTE ONLY: CONSIDERATION OF INCREASING STANDARD HEIGHT LIMIT IN R-3 AND R -P ZONES Shall the standard height limit for development upon R-3 and R -P zoned property be increased from 30 to 35 feet? Motion Edgerton, second Benz. A proposed amendment by Mayor Wiemans to change the ballot wording to read "... be increased back to 35 feet" was not accepted by the maker and second. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Essertier and Mayor Wiemans, and noting the absence of Midstokke. Action: To rescind and declare null and void the previous Council action of July 13, 1993, relating to the R-3 and R -P height ballot measure, and to instead place on the ballot an advisory measure to be worded as follows: ADVISORY VOTE ONLY: CONSIDERATION OF INCREASING STANDARD HEIGHT LIMIT IN R-3 AND R -P ZONES Shall the standard height limit for development upon R-3 and R -P zoned property be increased from 30 to 35 feet? Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Essertier and the absence of Midstokke. Final Action: To authorize Mayor Wiemans to file a written argument in favor of the measure, and Councilman Edgerton to file a written argument against the measure, with all Councilmembers invited to sign one argument or the other. Directed by Mayor Wiemans, with the consensus of Council, noting the absence of Midstokke. CITIZEN COMMENTS No one came forward to address the Council at this time. City Council Sp.Mtg. Minutes 07-22-93 Page 8226 C ADJOURNMENT The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Thursday, July 22, 1993, at 6:35 p.m., to a closed session as announced by City Attorney Vose for the purpose of discussing matters of meet and confer; a matter of pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a): Allen vs. Hermosa Beach; and a matter of potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b), to be followed by an Adjourned Regular Meeting at the hour of 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of conducting a joint workshop session with the; Planning Commission. City Council Bp.Mtg. Minutes 07-22-93 Page 8227 ("7-/-- 9_3 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on July 22, 1993, at the hour of 7:17 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - the closed session was held at 6:37 P.M. regard- ing matters of pending litigation, Allen (Strand Property Owners) vs City of Hermosa Beach: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a); potential litigation: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b); and, matters of personnel: meet and confer. The closed session was recessed at 7:03 P.M. to the regular ad- journed public meeting. ROLL CALL CITY COUNCIL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans Absent: None PLANNING COMMISSION Present: Oakes, Suard, Chairperson Di Monda Absent: Marks (arrived 7:26 P.M.), Merl ADJOURNMENT TO A JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION. TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION: 1. Adult Uses a. National City adult use legal case; b. City's adult use ordinance; and, c. Amortization of nonconforming uses. Supplemental letter from Richard Sullivan, 824 Third Street, dated July 21, 1993. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. General discussion ensued on legal means to control Adult Use businesses. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, requested that the City adhere to its newly enacted Adult Use Ordinance for current businesses and make them reorientate interior space so all patrons are visible and not behind closed booth doors; asked that standards be applied consistently; spoke of nuisances committed by patrons of the businesses. la(3) City Council Adj. Mtg. Minutes 07-22-93 Page 8228 2. RUDAT / Pier Improvement Planning Commission Chairperson Di Monda gave an update on the Pier Design contest and said there were currently 210 paid entries, both national and international. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Dean Nota - Pier Design Contest Chairperson, pres- ented information directly to the Council, said the design contest was composed of three sec- tions: 1) the Pier; 2) the Base (Pierhead area to Beach Drive); and, 3) redesign of the life- guard station. Mr. Nota continued that there was currently funding of $1.5 million and the estimated budget was $4 million; said the Pier was structurally sound and the design was cos- metic only; said entries would be judged the 1st of September by a panel of five judges. Interim City Manager Mary Rooney said the lifeguards would receive 30 million dollars from proceeds of Prop A, which could be used to fund the lifeguard station redesign. The Council thanked all involved with the Pier Design Contest. 3. Undergrounding Utilities Supplemental information submitted by Public Works Di- rector Amy Amirani at the meeting. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Ms. Amirani said the current balance in the undergrounding fund was $296,355 which would accrue at a rate of $131,574 per year over the next five years according to Rule 20.A of the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) 1993 allo- cated amount for the replacement of electric overhead with underground facilities plan. Ms. Amirani said SCE had assured her that the City could borrow an up to ten year amount for major projects, with an interest free loan, which would bring the total amount to $1,612,095 that would be available. She continued that the current CIP 93-145 had targeted both sides of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) from Artesia to Aviation (estimated cost $1.5 million) and Pier Avenue from PCH to Hermosa Avenue, but she would get full cost estimates on those and other areas and bring them back to Council for its prioritization, and, would try to incorporate any other street repair work with the project, such as sewer re- pair. Ms. Amirani also said that SCE will pay the first 100 feet per residential unit for undergrounding. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Lisa Anderson - North Hermosa Avenue, said Council City Council Adj. Mtg. Minutes 07-22-93 Page 8229 had agreed to underground her area years ago and should consider this area as a priority. Council discussed matching funds with residents to underground the entire City; the major cost of under - grounding was removing the power poles; and if a resi- dent could not afford a matching assessment then a lien could be placed on the property to be repaid when the property was sold. 4. Planting of Median on Pacific Coast Highway Supplemental information submitted by Public Works Di- rector Amy Amirani at the meeting. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Ms. Amirani said the approximate construction cost for a median, similar to Manhattan Beach, from Artesia to Aviation would be $320,000. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None Councilmember Midstokke asked that an updated prioritized list of studies under consideration by the Planning Department be com- piled and sent to Council. ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday July 22, 1993, at the hour of 8:55 P.M. to a continued closed session for the purpose of discussion of items of personnel: meet and confer. The closed session adjourned at the hour of 9:40 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, July 27, 1993, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Adj. Mtg. Minutes 07-22-93 Page 8230 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: City Clerk DATE: August 5, 1993 SUBJECT: Minutes of the meeting of July 27, 1993 The minutes of the meeting of July 27, 1993, will not be available for approval at the August 10 meeting, due to: 1) the current increased workload in the Clerk's office with regard to the upcoming election, including the opening of the candidate nomination period, which must take priority over other duties; 2 the additional preparation time needed for the regular meeting minutes of July 13 due to the workload and the complexity of the oil issue (presented in this agenda packet for approval); and 3) the preparation time needed for the special meeting minutes of July 22 (election issues), and for the adjourned regular meeting minutes of July 22 (joint workshop with Planning Commission), both of which are presented in this agenda packet for approval. The July 27 minutes will be presented for approval at the next regular meeting of August 24, along with the minutes of the special meeting held August 3 (County lifeguard issue). Thank you. Elaine Doerflinf, Citi Clerk SUPPLEMENTAL' 1NFORMATIO�(- . (Lt) ,s . 2 .;5 9 .I 1 I:, I1, 40,'7 Irn I. .:, X24 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME ... DESCRIPTION _.._ CHAPMAN_UNIVERSITY TUITION/L. SAVOY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 2--/d - PAGE 0001 DATE 08/02/93 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION_ . _ AMOUNT.UNENC. DATE -EXP____ 03026 001-400-2101-4312 07/29/93 POLICE 02127 . $225.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST VENDOR. _TOTAL, *******************************************************************_* $'75_00 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL_.ACCUUNT PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-93 H___ . HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-93 00243 001-202-0000-2030 .00568 07/19/93 00243 001-202-0000-2030 07/20/93 $319, 876.65._._. /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00569 $12..890_- 73 ..._ /ACCRUED PAYROLL *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H . HYATT REGENCY HOTEL HOTEL/L. SAVOY 05244 001-400-2101-4312 02126 07/29/93 POLICE *332.767.38 .4279__04._.. /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $279.04 H • 142 • 1, i 4 1 f'7 n�. 4!1 49 I,, ,. 15., PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.. RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT ADV/JUNE 93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS._ RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 I PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. ' RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.___ RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT, SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT__SYS. _._ RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS.. RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 00026 001-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 00026 001-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 00026 105-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 01384._ $85.950-_b4..._.._ /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 01385 *91.391.48CR /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00132 _ ... _ $921.61 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00026 109-202-0000-2020 00012 07/22/93 00026 110-202-0000-2020. 07/22/93 00026 110-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 '00026 115-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 00026 07/22/93 115-202-0000-2020 $144.27_ /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00200 .._ . __.. __ . $3,209_93 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00201. . _ $1,693.67 __.. /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00090 .._ ._.- ._. ... $87.87 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00091.. .... .._ . _ _ $138_ 18 _ - /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 05958 . 44588 --. $0.00 07/29/93 44583.-- $0. 00 07/29/93 44584-- $0.00 07/29/93 $0. 00 07/29/93 44586-- $0.00 4586-------$0.00 07/29/93 44586- -- $0.00 07/29/93 44586-- $0.00 07/29/93 44586 $0.00 07/29/93 44586 — $0.00 07/29/93 $0.00 .44586 — 07/29/93 _____44586______ $0.00 07/29/93 44586.-._ $0.00 07/29/93 lb 6 0 t(` t2 '3 14 IS 16 ,n 19 7r, 21 22! 2n 7.•t 2/, 72 211 3' 12 37 42 49 44 45 4t. 411 49 •14 5 90 57 56 rn n7 nt 0.' 6(1 R9 J9 72 7e e 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FINANCE—SFA340 _ TIME 10:36:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 .4G 47 151 a PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT.SYS.. RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/JUNE 93 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _... 00026 115-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 00026 155-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 00026 160-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 00026 160-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 00092 3326.33 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 0002 i DATE. 081021.93____ INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT_ UNENC_._._._DATE...EXP., 00041 $102.61 — /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00078 $939.82 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00079 $87.87 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00026 170-202-0000-2020 00021 07/22/93 00026 705-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 00026 705-202-0000-2020 07/22/93 $5, 623. 13 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00071 $259. 01 .. /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 00072 $332.25 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************r********* ****************** OFCR LARRY*SAVOY MEALS/P. O. S. T. CLASS 00628 001-400-2101-4312 02130 07/29/93 POLICE $8.425.71 $121.00. /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H H H STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/APR—JUN 93 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/APR—JUN 93 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/APR—JUN 93 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION _ SALES TAX DUE/APR—JUN 93 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION_ SALES TAX DUE/APR—JUN 93 00707 001-202-0000-2020 07/28/93 00707 001-202-0000-2020 07/28/93 00707 001-202-0000-2020 07/28/93 00707 001-202-0000-2020 07/28/93 00707 001-202-0000-2020 07/28/93 01386 01387 01388 $6.00 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 01389 $121. 00 $1,34(3,00 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ,129.00_ _ . /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $10,.000. _ /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 01390 $41.00_____ /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $0.00 44586 07/29/93 .44586 $0.00 07/29/93 44586 $0.00 07/29/93 44586 $0.00 07/29/93 $0.00 44586_ 07/29/93 44586 $0. 00 07/29/93 . 44586 $0.00 07/29/93 05956 44590._... $0.00 07/29/93 00072 44587 $0.00 07/29/93 00072 44587.. _.. $0.00 07/29/93 00072 44587 __. $0.00 07/29/93 _ 000072__-_ .44587. $0.00 07/29/93 00007.2.._ 44587_ $0.00 07/29/93 P. 7 '3 IC 77 7G Y7 79 3' .17 14 40 1 4, 48 19 51 54 rsi 38 9, 77 17 I �-. 1-, r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCR IPT ION STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX DUE/APR-JUN 93 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00707 170-202-0000-2020 07/28/93 00022 $111,00 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE *** VENDOR TOTAL +r*******************►**********************************************+r *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** A & E TROPHIES _,. __._ MISC CHARGES/JULY 93 INV/REF AMOUNT . $1, 545. 00 _.._ $343,363.13 02744 001-400-1101-4319 00161 .. $23.96 07/29/93 CITY COUNCIL_ /SPECIAL EVENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES MISC CHARGES/JULY 93 00138 001-400-2101-4309 00636 06/30/93 POLICE 00138 001-400-2101-4309 00637 07/22/93 POLICE $23. 96 $118.15 _ /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $380. 00 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/JULY 93 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/AUG 93 R I ADVANCED ELECTRONICS ' RADIO MAINT/JULY 93 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/AUG 93 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/JULY 93 VENDOR TOTAL 00935 001-400-2101-4201 07/01/93 POLICE 00935 001-400-2101-4201 07/29/93 POLICE 00935 001-400-2201-4201 07/01/93 FIRE 00935 001-400-2201-4201 07/29/93 FIRE $498. 15 01311 $2,381.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 01312 00403 00404 00935 110-400-3302-4201 00416 07/01/93 PARKING ENF $2,381.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $205. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $205..00. /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $239. 50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ******************************************************************** ALFAX MANUFACTURING CORP. DISCOUNT OFFERED 00191 001-202-0000-2021 00451 07/29/93 $5, 412...50 _ $6.32. DISCOUNTS OFFERED PAGE 0003 DATE 08/02/93 PO # CHK # --1, UNENC _.._ DATE. EXP...._.___ 00072 44587 _ $0.00 07/29/93 00102 _44595 __.. $0.00 07/29/93 00103 44596 $0.00 07/29/93 00103 44596 $0. 00 07/29/93 ri s, 9 7 9 ,> '0 ,o 20 22 2 1 • • • 00048 44597 $0.00 07/29/93 00048 44597 $0.00 07/29/93 00048 44597._ .._ $0. 00 07/29/93 00048. ._._.44597 $0.00 07/29/93 00058 44597 $0.00 07/29/93 04297. 44598 _._. $0.00 07/29/93 • • 14 .111 51116 64 71 :M1 • . .-.—...egg,..111-.1,11..1..-,.. I• 17 er. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:38:28...._. PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R ALFAX MANUFACTURING CORP. DISCOUNT TAKEN R ALFAX MANUFACTURING CORP. FILE CABINET/BUILDING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00191 001-202-0000-2022 00449 $6.32CR 07/29/93 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN PAGE 0004 DATE 08/02/93-.-- INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC.---..--DATE -EXP --- 00191 001-400-4201-5401 00043 #213.19 07/29/93 BUILDING /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R .___ALL POINTS MAINTENANCE. FISHING PIER MAINT/APR93 R ALL POINTS MAINTENANCE FISHING PIER MAINT/MAY93 R ALL POINTS MAINTENANCE FISHING PIER MAINT/JUN93 $213.19 05221 001-400-3103-4201 00476 $715.00 04/30/93 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 05221 05/31/93 05221 05/31/93 001-400-3103-4201 00477 ST MAINTENANCE 001-400-3103-4201 00478 ST MAINTENANCE $715.00_ /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $715.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AMERICAN EAGLE BUS/COMM RES SUMMER CAMP $21145_ 00 03118 145-400-3409-4201 00070 $445.00 07/20/93 REC TRANSPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL****************#*************************************************** R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS MISC CHARGES/JULY 93 $445.00 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01390 $229.50 07/29/93 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************************#****#*# _._.$224._.50... R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAGS/JUNE 93 ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAGS/JUL 93 ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL__..._ UTILITY RAGS/JUNE 93 ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAGS/JUNE 93 00152 001-400-2201-4309 01497 06/30/93 FIRE 00152 001-400-2201-4309 01498 07/02/93 FIRE 00152 001-400-3104-4309. 01074 06/30/93 TRAFFIC SAFETY `•. 00152 001-400-4204-4309 02669_ 06/30/93 BLDG MAINT $72.80. --- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS _ $31.40.. _ .. /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $34..3a __-._......... .. ..... /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS _ . /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 04297 44598 $0.00 07/29/93 04297-.------.__44598--- $0.00 4598 ----- $0.00 07/29/93 00079 -44599.-. $0.00 07/29/93 00079 . 44599 $0.00 07/29/93 00079 44599 $0.00 07/29/93 07020 . .44600 .- $0. 00 07/29/93 00105. $0.00 2 3 4 6 6 2, 27 24 25 2a It 37 44601._..._.._- 44 07/29/93 00017. _ _ ..44602...__ $0.00 07/29/93 00017 ..... _...44602--... _. $0.00 07/29/93 00017__..._ _.._...44602-...__.— $0.00 07/29/93 00017 44602 _- $0.00 07/29/93 45 4n 47 4n 40 52 54 55 56 56 60 62 64 95 66 57 nn r,4 m 74 15 e I'I • • • • • ' 1 Ip 0 • FINANCE—SFA340 _.___TIME__10:.38; 28_._. PAY VENDOR NAME _ __ DESCRIPTION ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL_ UTILITY RAGS/JUNE 93 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL UTILITY RAGS/JUNE 93 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION.._. 00152 06/30/93 001-400-4205-4309 00739 EQUIP SERVICE 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00910 06/30/93 PARKING ENF PAGE 0005 ._DATE. 08102/93 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC__._._.I)ATE...EXR____ $95.03 /MAINTENANCE MATERIAL.S $17.68 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*******#*#######**#****4**********#***********************-4b# ****** R AT&T PD FAX LONG DIST/JUN 93 89001 05179 001-400-2101-4304 06/30/93 POLICE $655.59 01252 33.89 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************4***4*****#************************** R BECKER SURFBOARDS SURF CAMP SUPPLIES 05253 001-300-0000-3894 07/22/93 460005 00468 $4,691.55 2 3 4 5 • • 6 • 00017 44602 _..__.._ $0.00 07/29/93 . 00017 .44602. $0.00 07/29/93 7320791389001 01087 ..44603...._._. $0.00 07/29/93 33.89 07029 . 44604..._ /OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************************#********** *** R OLIN*BELL SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR $4,691.55 04277 001-400-4601-4221 00251. $563.50 07/26/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR VENDOR TOTAL*******4****,r****4************#************************************* R BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS MED WASTE SERV/JUNE 93 41723 3563. 50 07043 $0.00 07/29/93 04540 001-400-2101-4201 01304 $31.90 930600-0041723 00075 06/30/93 POLICE_ /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****4************************************************************** R DORAL MATERIALS MISC CHARGES/JUNE 1993 $31.90 05130 001-400-3103-4309 01531 $120.88 06/30/93 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/JULY 93 R BROWNING & FE_RRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/JULY 93 3120 88 00155 001-400-1208-4201 01022 $610.13. 07/01/93 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00155 109-400-3301-4201 00193 3360.12 07/01/93 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 44606 . 07/29/93 00109 44607 . $0.00 07/29/93 00005 44608 $0.00 07/29/93 00005 9 20 77 25 l0 17 A, Al An A,1 44808 • • • • • • • $0.00 07/29/93 ...I• ni� Iro I FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 PAGE 0006 DATE 08/02/93. PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # a DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ___. "_ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $970.25 R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00480 $3,916.26 00004. .44609 _. DUMP CHARGES/JUNE 93 06/30/93 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/29/93 *n* VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,916.26 R C. A. P. E._ . 04184 001-400-2101-4315 00235 . $35.00 . 06832 ... 44610 . ANNUAL DUES/T. JOHNSON 07/15/93 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $35.00 R C. C. U. G. 01573 001-400-2101-4315 00236 $40.00 .. 06841 44611 _. ANNUAL DUES/V. ELLEDGE 07/21/93 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.00 * * * CALBO ABM SEMINAR REG/W. GROVE 02101 001-400-4201-4316 00313 $25.00 07/20/93 BUILDING /TRAINING VENDOR TOTAL ***************************** ************************************** .$25.00 07201. .. ... 44612.._...._ $0.00 07/29/93 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00284 $612.86. 01011 44613 WATER BILLINGS/JULY 93 07/18/93 MEDIANS /UTILITIES $0.00 07/29/93 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00691 $561.16 01011 44613 WATER BILLINGS/JULY 93 07/18/93 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES $0.00 07/29/93 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00523 $4.035.42 01011 44613 .. WATER BILLINGS/JULY 93 07/18/93 PARKS /UTILITIES $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5,209. 44 R THERESA*CALISH 05250 001-300-0000-3893 02488 $25.00 60633/YSM9 07015 . .44614..._._. SUMMER CLASS REFUND /YSM9 06/30/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $25. 00 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 001-202-0000-2021 00450 $86.84 3786 05675 44616 DISCOUNT OFFERED 3786 07/23/93 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 07/29/93 .1,2),‘,4441,4 8 ii 22 21 76 27 2n 3' f • r, FINANCE-SFA340 .TIME 10:38:28 • .. • i ...I • "' ' PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT DISCOUNT TAKEN 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 _R.__ CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT. . _ OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 ___ CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 'q�, {,FivS�iy�i �yrir; `.1 ;s�.i: r'•'�t � 1 �'�?'z n_�; CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 PAGE 0007 DATE 08/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC-.---DATE-E%P.__ 00389 001-202-0000-2022 07/23/93 00448 $86.84CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 00389 001-400-1141-4201 00167 $43.78 07/23/93 CITY TREASURER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00389 001-400-1201-4201 00179 $59.87 _. 07/23/93 CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00389 001-400-1202-4201 00362 07/23/93 3786 05675 44616 $0.00 07/29/93 3786 05675 $0.00 3786 05675 $0.00 $159.20 3786 -- 05675 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00389 001-400-1203-4201 01058 $43.78 07/23/93 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00389 001-400-1206-4201 01141 $17.92 07/23/93 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00389 001-400-1207-4201 00044 $17.92 -. 07/23/93 BUS LICENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 3786 05675 $0.00 3786 05675 $0.00 -44616 - 07/29/93 44616 -- 07/29/93 44616 -- 07/29/93 44616 07/29/93 _44616 .--- 07/29/93 3786 05675 44616 $0.00 07/29/93 00389 001-400-1208-4201 .01021 .__.._ ..............._$43..76....._.._.._.. _...._ _.__.3786___05675 _44616-- 07/23/93 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/29/93 00389 001-400-2101-4201 07/23/93 POLICE 00389 001-400-2201-4201 07/23/93 FIRE 01306 . . $530.01 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00398 $73.76 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00389 001-400-2401-4201 00392 $115.42 07/23/93 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00389 001-400-4101-4201 00202 07/23/93 PLANNING _ _$59.87 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00389 001-400-4201-4201 00863 . . $113.42 07/23/93 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00389 001-400-4202-4201 00414 07/23/93 _ $121. 56 ..........._ . PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00389 001-400-4601-4201 01846 $141.29.. 07/23/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 3786 05675 44616 $0.00 07/29/93 3786 05675 44616_--- $0.00 07/29/93 3786 05675 44616 $0.00 07/29/93 3786 05675 44616 __ $0.00 07/29/93 3786 05675. 44616...____ $0.00 07/29/93 3786 05675 . ....44616 _ . $0.00 07/29/93 3786 05675 44616 $0.00 07/29/93 r .11 .57 ,, • • • • Or FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 ti' PAY VENDOR NAME 'I DESCRIPTION 1 'I m 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACH MAINT/FY 94 3786 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0008 ..DATE _08/02/93._., INV/REF PO * CHK * 3 AMOUNT UNENC._ .. _ DATE._EXP_ ._ r °_ 00389 110-400-1204-4201 00023 $108.53 07/23/93 FINANCE CASHIER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 1 1 1 1 I ,A1 „i -1-111 - ,l ••.: p R JAMES C.*CICCIARELLI WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 50993 05242 001-210-0000-2110 07/22/93 $1,650.11 3786 05675- 44616 -. $0. 00 07/29/93 05409 $1,600.00 50993 06756. 44617 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 07/29/93 ***_VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** CINTAS CORPORATION,___ UNIFORM RENTAL/JUNE 93 R CINTAS CORPORATION,. UNIFORM RENTAL/JUNE 93 $1. 600. 00 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00236 $558.88 06/30/93 PUB WKS ADMIN /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00426 06/30/93 PARKING ENF $26.25 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • $585.13 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIFORNIA....... 00356 001-400-1121-4315 00082 .$100..00 _ DUES/DOERFLING/VALDES 07/21/93 CITY CLERK /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** wrmrimpl R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR CHECKING ACCT INT/JUN 93 COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAD CLAIMS/JUNE 93 R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAR CLAIMS/JUNE 93 R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAR CLAIMS/JUNE 93 R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAR CLAIMS/JULY 93 R COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAB CLAIMS/JUNE 93 04928 705-300-0000-3401 00076 06/30/93 04928 705-400-1209-4201 00386 06/30/93 LIABILITY INS 04928 705-400-1209-4201 00387 06/30/93 LIABILITY INS 04928 705-400-1209-4201 00388 06/30/93 LIABILITY INS 04928 705-400-1209-4201 00389 07/01/93 LIABILITY INS 04928 705-400-1209-4324 00400 06/30/93 LIABILITY INS $100. 00 $23. 51CR /INTEREST INCOME $6,922.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $11,913.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $774.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 3405. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT .$194.26 /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 00002 44618 $0. 00 07/29/93 00002. _ ..___ 4.4618.... $0. 00 07/29/93 03921._ ..__44619_.____ $0.00 07/29/93 05596 44620 $0.00 07/29/93 05596 44620 _. _.. $0.00 07/29/93 05597 44620 $0.00 07/29/93 07101 44620 $0. 00 07/29/93 0559.7 .. 44620 $0.00 07/29/93 05596 44620 $0.00 07/29/93 A ,3 ,A .9 2:1 72 7,1 76 77 20 11 to A9 Al A7 11 44 Aft 17 1" A9 • r r a • • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME Cl DESCRIPTION .Y I,n L; . s.7 1I 4.! I R COLEN ►. LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAB CLAIMS/JUNE 93 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND ft ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN • AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF 04928 705-400-1209-4324 00401 $1,462.13 06/30/93 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL#*•x*•n•r##****************##r*#*************• **•nr*•n#*********•n***•n•nr** R COLEN AND LEE LIAB ADMIN/AUGUST 93 $21,647.88 04715 705-400-1209-4201 00390 $1,470.00 07/29/93 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************#n******** R R R R R R R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 R R R R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 COM SYSTEMS, INC _ LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 $1,470.00 00017 001-400-1101-4304 00571 $0.40 06/30/93 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00643 $6.15 06/30/93 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1131-4304 00479 $5.03 06/30/93 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00664 $1.32 06/30/93 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00716 $8.36 06/30/93 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00716 $26.51 06/30/93 FINANCE ADMIN, /TELEPHONE 00017 001--400-1203-4304 00726 $23.97 06/30/93 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1206-4304 00647 $11.90 06/30/93 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-1207-4304 00517 $9.21 06/30/93 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE '00017 001-400-2101-4304 01251 $354.02_ 06/30/93 POLICE /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00718 $10.00 06/30/93 PLANNING /TELEPHONE tip PAGE 0009 0 DATE 08/02/93 71 • 4 PO It CHK M AMOUNT UNENC ._.....DATE .EXP._ __.._. 05597 44620 $0.00 07/29/93 00042 44621 .. $0.00 07/29/93 01017 44623 $0.00 07/29/93 01017 44623 $0. 00 07/29/93 01017 44623 $0.00 07/29/93 01017 44623 _____ $0.00 07/29/93 01017 . 44623 $0.00 07/29/93 01017 44623 $0. 00 07/29/93 01017 44623 $0.00 07/29;'93 01017 . 44623 $0.00 07/29/93 01017 44623.- $0. 00 07/29/93 01017.. ..44623 $0. 00 07/29/93 01017. 44623. . $0.00 07/29/93 +n 14 ,.Sill Sf 9i n CO 5, an es • S • S FINANCE-SFA340 ELME 10: 38; 28.. PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/JUNE 1993 VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 .. VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00649 $39.31 06/30/93 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00780 $33.71 06/30/93 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00827 $14.65.... 06/30/93 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00236 $8.77 06/30/93 STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE 00017 110-400-1204-4304 00045 $5.47 06/30/93 FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00741 .$22.80 _... 06/30/93 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE ***************************************************44*4**4*',1******** R CONNECTING POINT LEASING _ COMPUTER RENT/AUG 93 R. CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/JULY 93 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/AUG 93 R I CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/JULY 93 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/AUG 93 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/JULY 93 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/AUG 93 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/JULY 93 PAGE 0010 DATE_08/0219-3 INV/REF PO # CHK * AMOUNT UNENC- -- DATE -EXP ----- $581. 58 03617 001-400-2101-4201 01307 $489.57 07/22/93 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03617 001-400-2101-4201 01310 $489.57 07/08/93 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03617 001-400-2201-4201 00399 $159.40 07/22/93 FIRE . /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03617 001-400-2201-4201 00402 $159.40 07/08/93 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03617 001-400-2701-4201 00083 $330.18 _. 07/22/93 CIVIL DEFENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03617 001-400-2701-4201 00084 $330.18 07/08/93 CIVIL DEFENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03617 170-400-2103-4201 00168 $159.39 ...-.. . 07/22/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03617 170-400-2103-4201 00169 $159.39 07/08/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 01017 44623 $0.00 07/29/93 01017 -- .44423------- $0.00 07/29/93 01017 . 44623 $0.00 07/29/93 01017 . ... _ 44623.- -- $0.00 - $0.00 07/29/93 01017. 44623 $0.00 07/29/93 .01017..._ .. 44623 $0.00 07/29/93 06842.._._4624------ $0.00 07/29/93 00051 44624 $0.00 07/29/93 06842 44624 __ $0. 00 07/29/93 00051 44624 -_ $0.00 07/29/93 06842 44624_. $0.00 07/29/93 00051 44624 $0.00 07/29/93 06842 . ...44624...._ $0.00 07/29/93 00051 44624 $0.00 07/29/93 2 3 4 9 e a e n 41, Iz 14 17 In 19 7,3 2I 22 21 74 7/1 717 rn 2n ao 11 41 a2 4., 44 41 46 47 411 49 -•z 94 �L A? 11 64 111 r.R �n 11,1 ,n 71 72 74 • ' ✓ .i a r • r' `.1 1'9 111;,'"i 144 1.40 ;n FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R CONNECTING POINT LEASING MAC COMPUTER BUYOUT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 .. VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0011 DATE 08/02/93 INV/REF' PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC._.__.DATE_.EXP.... 03617 170-400-2103-5402 00101 $4,135.05 07/22/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS/EQUIP—MORE THAN $500 *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************.****************** R WENDY*CONOLE 05224 001-300-0000-3893 02489 SUMMER CLASS REFUND /SM05 06/30/93 R WENDY*CONOLE 05224 001-300-0000-3893 02503 SUMMER CLASS REFUND 14-13 06/30/93 /CONTR /CONTR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6,412.13 06842 44624 $0. 00 2 w 7 07/29/93 u ;Si* r $40.00 . 60770/SMO5 07014 44625 RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 07/29/93 $140.00 60770/SM14-15 07026 . 44625 RECREATION CLASSES $180.00 R CONTINENTAL TOOL 7,4 HOIST 03878 001-400-3103-4309 01528 $346.06 GLOVES/SHOVELS/ST MAINT 55341 06/30/93 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $346. 06 $0.00 07/29/93 955341 06576 44626..___.. $0.00 07/29/93 R KATHY*COOK 05225 001-300-0000-3893 02502 $90.00 60795/3M07 07040 44627 SUMMER CLASS REFUND /SMO7 06/30/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $90.00 R CAROLE*COOPER 05226 001-300-0000-3893 ,SUMMER CLASS REFUND /SM14 06/30/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************#********************************************* $50,_00 02501 $50.00 .. 63594/SM14 R CREATIVE JUICES 04981 001-400-4601-4302 00220..,._.........$475,00 TYPESET REC BROCHURE 07/27/93 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R JIM*CUBBERLEY SURF CAMP INSTRUCTOR $475. 00 02971 001-300-0000-3894 ,00447 $1,125.00._ 07/22/93 460005 /OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************#****************************************** TRUDY*DEHNER _ 05227 001-300-0000-3893 SUMMER CLASS REFUND SM171 06/30/93 :s' $1, 125. 00 07024 44628 ___ $0.00 07/29/93 .._07053. .._ .44629.___. $0.00 07/29/93 07028 _..44630 $0.00 07/29/93 02500 .. $96.00.. 60507/SM171 07037_ /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 ;d .,- i' i:r- :y 7oSRJ`r16SV��. , 4.L;f'�� 44631 07/29/93 -Iw vit nn 49 ;;O • a, r 84 I� • FINANCE-SFA340 _._..._..TIME _10;_ 38_; 28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4k AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR. TOTAL******************************************************************* DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL..CARE - SHELTER COSTS/JUNE 93 PAGE 0012 DATE 08/02/93- INV/REF 8/02/93- INV/REF PO IF CHF( k AMOUNT UNENC *96. 00 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00220 $632.20 06/30/93 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************************+t*** DEPARTMENT.OF TRANSPORTATION REP DAMAGE/ARTESIA-PCH 10223 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY MAINT/MAY 93 26358 R DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HWY MAINT/MAY 93 26358 00267 001-400-3103-4309 01529 06/01/93 ST MAINTENANCE 00267 001-400-3104-4251 00133 06/20/93 TRAFFIC SAFETY $632.20 $185.93 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $455.58 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00267 105-400-2601-4251 00197 $455.59 06/20/93 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT n** VENDOR TOTAL ******+****************************************************n******** R THE *DEVELOPMENT MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 R THE *DEVELOPMENT 00147 001-400-2101-4305 06/30/93 POLICE $1,097.10 02019 $47.18 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00_014__._ $0.00 07/29/93 7110223 06579 44633 $0.00 07/29/93 126358 06581 44633 $0.00 07/29/93 126358 06581 44633 ..... 07/29/93 $0.00 01020 44634 $0.00 07/29/93 00147 001-400-2101-4306 01389 $12.33 7320791389001 01020 44634 MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 89001 06/30/93 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 07/29/93 R THE *DEVELOPMENT MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 00147 001-400-2201-4305 00631 $24.42 06/30/93 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DICTAPHONE, INC. 02855 001-400-2101-4201 ANNUAL MAINT/FY 93-94 76654 07/01/93 POLICE R DICTAPHONE, INC. $83.93 01308 $1,491.50 P276654 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02855 001-400-2201-4201 00400 ANNUAL MAINT/FY 93-94 76654 07/01/93 FIRE $994.50 P276654 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R DIEHL, EVANS b. COMPANY SEMINAR REG/V. COPELAND ._ $2,486-00 05245 001-400-1202-4316 00457 $45.00 07/21/93 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 01020 $0.00 44634 .__. . 07/29/93 06846 44635 $0.00 07/29/93 06846 44635 $0.00 07/29/93 05674 44636 $0.00 07/29/93 4 6 Tv - ,r ,3 4 16 ii Co FINANCE—SFA340 TIME. 10:38:28 ' i PAY VENDOR NAME • Y'• 11� 0;" DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT' DESCRIPTION - *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************************** ******** R DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPLY MISC CHARGES/JULY 93 PAGE 0013 . _DATE 08/021.93..--.. INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC--.-.DATE-EXP ..--.- $45. 00 04394 001-400-2101-4306 01392 $107.28 07/29/93 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL.******************************************************************** .MARIANNE*DUGAN .05228 001-300-0000-3893 06/30/93 $107.28 01022— . . 44637-..__ _-- $0.00 07/29/93 02499 $50.00 .. 60798/8M14 .-. 07025-------.44638 SUMMER CLASS REFUND /SM14 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************************** _ LEE*DUNSTEDER SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR * $50.00 05229 001-400-4601-4221 00250 $220.50 07/26/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY... COPIER METER USE/MAY 93 07932 R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY-.. COPIER MAINT/JUNE 93 02840 001-400-1208-4201 01019 06/30/93 GEN APPROP 02840 001-400-1208-4201 01020 07932 06/30/93 GEN APPROP $220. 50 _$263.66 . 006M07932 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $298.00 . 006M07932 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R EASY READER PUBLIC NOTICE ADS/JUN 93 0268 VENDOR TOTAL $561. 66 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00239 $708.09 06/30/93 CITY CLERK /PUBL_IC NOTICING ********************************** R EFRAM MOBIL MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 R EFRAM MOBIL MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 01400 06/30/93 ********************************* 001-400-2101-4310 POLICE $708.09 00412 $100.03 /MOTOR FUELS AND LURES 01400 110-400-3302-4310 00202 06/30/93 PARKING ENF *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************4***************************** R TOM*ELLIOTT WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 51009 05243 001-210-0000-2110 07/22/93 $2. 50 ... /MOTOR FUELS AND LURES ************ $102.53 .07046 44639.-- $0. 00 07/29/93 01025..._ .. 44640---- $0.00 4640-----..$0.00 07/29/93 01025 ... .44640 $0.00 07/29/93 0268 01026 44641 $0.00 07/29/93 01028 44642 *0. 00 07/29/93 01028 44642_ .... $0. 00 07/29/93 05410 _.._ $1,600.00 _ . 51009 06755 __ _ 44643 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 07/29/93 "), ;r'. i;tYr?MWttr. '2 ': 1? 2 1 12 • lA V le fli In 20 2, 22 23 41110 1A 711 7C 2) v 21) 29 30 31 Ili 32 14 F, 3) ,q .1, 41 42 43 44 4.1 AR 41 411 A9 M1tM1 0111 • 11 r w V e ',i F2 ir Fo 1, 31 12 I'6 W f1 in 1' I0 71 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN k AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R FASTENER CORPORATION SEWER MAINT SUPPLIES 11518 04915 04/19/93 160-400-3102-4309 00818 SEWER/ST DRAIN PAGE 0014 DATE 08/02/93-___ INV/REF PO M CNK # AMOUNT UNENC .. DATE .EXP.._._.. - $1, 600.00 $1.228.64 __ ... /MAINTE.NANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** STEVE*FILLMAN SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR 03169 001-400-4601-4221 00248 06/30/93 COMM RESOURCES $1,228.64 $1.302.00 /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R FLAGHOUSE SUPPLIES/SUMMER DAY CAMP 82009 $1,302.00 04686 001-400-4601-4308 00869 $64.35 06/23/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL_******************************************************************** R _ GANDALF DATA, INC. MODEM MAINT/JUL-DEC 93 6611 *64.35 111518 06507______4,4644_____ $0.00 07/29/93 07051 .- - 44645 ---. $0.00 07/29/93 030982009 06638 . 44646 $64. 50 07/29/93 01432 001-400-1206-4201 01142 $546.00. 07/01/93 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************* R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 01340 07/01/93 ********* 001-400-1101-4304 00572 CITY COUNCIL 01340 001-400-1121-4304 00644 07/01/93 CITY CLERK 01340 07/01/93 01340 07/01/93 01340 07/01/93 • 01340 07/01/93 001-400-1131-4304 00480 CITY ATTORNEY 001-400-1141-4304 00665 CITY TREASURER 001-400-1201-4304 00717 CITY MANAGER 001-400-1202-4304 00717 FINANCE ADMIN ..$546.00 $3.62 /TELEPHONE $9.82 /TELEPHONE $5.17 /TELEPHONE $9.82 /TELEPHONE $8.78 /TELEPHONE $34.60 . . /TELEPHONE 6611 0001B . 44647_ ._. $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 2 7 4 12 i 1,1 111 IF 15 2n 2a 27 14 ,s ,10 ,w ,0 2,1 rr FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME _ DESCRIPTION GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R .GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R .._ GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 GTEL EQUIP RENTAL/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/JULY 93 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER .TRN.4" AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01340 001-400•-1203-4304 00727 $12.40 07/01/93 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1206-4304 00648 $14.98 ___ 07/01/93 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1207-4304 00518 $9.82.. 07/01/93 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1208-4304 00309 $5.17. 07/01/93 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE 01340 07/01/93 01340 07/29/93 001-400-2101-4304 01253 *195.27 POLICE /TELEPHONE 001-400-2101-4304 01254 POLICE /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-2201-4304 07/01/93 FIRE 00551 *5. 17 _ /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-2401-4304 00553 .. $5._.17 07/01/93 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4101-4304 00719 *25.31 07/01/93 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4201-4304 00650 *44.94 07/01/93 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4202-4304 00781 $50.10 07/01/93 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00828 *14.98 07/01/93 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-6101-4304 00517 $5.17 07/01/93 PARKS /TELEPHONE 01340 07/01/93 • 01340 07/01/93 110-400-1204-4304 00046 *31.00 FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE 110-400-3302-4304 00742 *25.31 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE PAGE 0015 .DATE 08/02/93. INV/REF PO * CHK N AMOUNT UNENC 00067 44649 _ $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 .__. 30. 00 07/29/93 00067.. 44649 _ $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649._ $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 _ $0.00 07/29/93 01033 44649 *0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 00067. ... 44649.... $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 *0.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 • 0 e e it IP, 7U 7, 77 73 7e 7,. 77 20 7A ,. v 3. '0 17 11 nn 44 00067 44649 30. 00 07/29/93 00067 44649 30.00 07/29/93 00067 44649 $0.00 07/29/93 71 72 21, • V tok • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL+*#**#####****#####**##*#****#****#######***#ff41u####*****##st******ttt* R H. H. P. C. DEPOSIT/COMMRES TRIP PAGE 0016 -DATE-08/02/93-- INV/REF DATE. 08/02/93----- INV/REF PO * CHK # AMOUNT UNENC -.DATE EXP $568.16 05240 001-400-4601-4201 01845 $90.00 07/22/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL*******###*###*#**#*****************n###**************#*##n#***##### HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. STREET SWEEPER PARTS $90.00 00731 001-400-3103-4311 00883 $362.41 8136 07/07/93 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL********#***#*********#*#*#*********************************#******* R RALPH*HARBOE ANIMAL TRAP REFUND R RALPH*HARBOE ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 05237 001-210-0000-2110 05411 63950 07/22/93 05237 001-300-0000-3895 63950 07/22/93 $362.41 $50.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 00099 $6. 70CR /ANIMAL TRAP FEE *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************#***********#*#*********#*#* R HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SERV, INC. WORK COMP ADMIN/JUL-SEP $43.30 04108 705-400-1217-4201 00168 $8,000.00 07/01/93 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL************************#******************************************* R HEART FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN VAULT STORAGE/FY 93-94 $8,000.00 00203 001-400-1121-4201 00094 $100.00 07/01/93 CITY CLERK /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL*#******************#*********************************************** CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH CHECKING ACCT INT/FY 93 R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH_ , WORK COMP CLAIMS/JUN 93 R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH WORK COMP CLAIMS/JUNE 93 04075 705-300-0000-3401 00077 06/30/93 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00298 06/30/93 WORKERS COMP 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00299 06/30/93 WORKERS COMP $100. 00 $356. 3BCR /INTEREST INCOME $4,633.55_ _ /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR *9,641.96 /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR 07031 44650-..- $0. 00 07/29/93 8136 06568 44.651 $0.00 07/29/93 63950 06758 - 44652 - $0. 00 07/29/93 63950 0675B 44652 $0.00 07/29/93 00044 44653 $0.00 07/29/93 03922 44654 --- $0.00 07/29/93 0 ,7 n 14 21 7, el 70 7- „ AC AR 19 05595 44655 .._ R" $0.00 07/29/93 ,R 00 a7 RA 05595 .. 44655 ____ $0.00 07/29/93 05600 44655 $0.00 07/29/93 RR 67 00 7, 77 7� Orn r IA yi FINANCE—SFA340 �__—_-- TIME .10:_.38; 28 . -_ -.__.._._.-- I" in c"! 1'; r '. PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 _. 112 PAGE 0017 id ..- _...DATE ..08L02/91 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVG PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT.UNENC-. DATE..IXP_._ R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00300 *8,094.49 05600 44655 WORK. COMP CLAIMS/JUL 93 07/29/93 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR *0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *22,013.62 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-2101-4311 01660 *169.00 30805 01036 44656 MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 30805 06/30/93 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *0.00 07/29/93 HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-4601-4311 00160 *8.00 ._. 30805...01036._._ 44656____ MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 30805 06/30/93 COMM RESOURCES /AUTO MAINTENANCE *0.00 07/29/93 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 170-400-2103-4311 00112 *12.00 30605 01036 44656..... MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 30805 06/30/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE *0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *189. 00 R HMC GROUP 05222 170-400-8619-4201 00001 *9.450.00 946 06840 44657 50% ARCHITECT/PD REMODEL 946 07/01/93 PD REMODEL III /CONTRACT' SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *9,450.00 R BRAD*HOFFMAN 05230 001-300-0000-3893 02498 *50.00 64110/SM14 07041 44658 SUMMER CLASS REFUND /SM14 06/30/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *50.00 R I HOPE CHAPEL FIRE FLOW REFUND 52116 05249 180-300-0000-3912 00446 *7,184.60 52116 04299 44659 06/30/93 /FIRE FLOW FEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *7.184.60 *0. 00 07/29/93 2 3 • 2 • • IQ Mb 20 2, 22 2 • 2., 75 21, 21. • In A2 t gad ,Iv R ICE CAPADES CHALET . 05204 001-400-4601-4308 00873 *540.50420 06645 44660 TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 07/07/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *0.00 07/29/93 I*' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *540. 50 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC •02458 001-202-0000-2021 00453 *11.45 DISCOUNT OFFERED 07/29/93 DISCOUNTS OFFERED • 01037 44661 *0.00 07/29/93 -� .lf. , • 1"::... '';Te a iti' a, ,. ,¢x;.14.... , .. .., 412 410 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT TAKEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0018 F7 FOR 08/02/93 DATE 08/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROD fR ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC . DATE. EXP 02458 001-202-0000-2022 00451 $11.45CR 01037 44661 07/29/93 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 07/29/93 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 105-400-8201-4309 00075 $242.46 01037 44661...._. MISC CHARGES/JULY 93 , 07/29/93 CIP 85-201 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/29/93 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 115-400-8144-4309 00013 $319.54 01037 44661 MISC CHARGES/JULY 93 07/29/93 STRAND WALL/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL +►•rn***********tt**********i**************•n******************a******tea► $562.00 R J C PAPER 03083 001-400-1208-4305 01235 $319.07 80809120 05669 44662 LASER PAPER/STOCK 09120 07/06/93 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $319.07 R RIC*JENNINGS 04251 001-400-4601-4221 00249 $672.00 07050 44663 SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/30/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $672. 00 R JET DELIVERY, INC. 00281 001-400-4202-4201 00413 $28.75. 10880 06567 44664 DELIVERY SERV/PUB WORKS 10880 06/30/93 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************•n************************************* $28.75 * * * R 1 ALAN*KAN SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR VENDOR TOTAL 03376 001-400-4601-4221 00256 $483.00 07048 44665 07/26/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 07/29/93 ******************************************************************** R L.A. CO POLICE CHIEFS' ASSOC. 02428 001-400-2101-4315 00234 DUES/V. STRASER 07/22/93 POLICE $483. 00 $25. 00. /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** - i @.arae r:. .. $25. 00 06851 44666 .. $0.00 07/29/93 R L.A. COUNTY METROPOLITAN 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00164 $493.00 71313 06908 44667 BUS PASS SALES/JULY 93 71313 07/22/93 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 07/29/93 r a 7 y,. 01 71 II /12 I 110 12 -H .4. FINANCE—SFA340 _.. __._LIME 10;38;28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 PAGE 0019 DATE 08/02/93_---. VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK $ DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC..... DATE VW-- *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************************.******** R LA OUINTA INN HOTEL/J. PELKA $493.00 04473 001-400-2101-4312 02131 $132.00 07/13/93 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************************** ******** . KATHY*LAMBERT $132.00 05231 001-300-0000-3893 02497 $54.00 63562/SMO1 SUMMER CLASS REFUND /SM01 06/30/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************************* $54.00 R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 115-400-8144-4309 00012 $26.75 MISC CHARGES/JUNE 1993 06/30/93 STRAND WAL.L/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** MICHAEL*LEE WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 32803 R MICHAEL*LEE WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 32804 05241 001-210-0000-2110 07/22/93 $26.75 05960 44668 . $0. 00 07/29/93 07035 44669 $0.00 07/29/93 01038 44670 .- $0.00 -.$0.00 07/29/93 05407 $1.600.00 32803 06757 . .44671 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 07/29/93 05241 001-210-0000-2110 05408 07/22/93 $600.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************n******************************* R LINDA*LOCKE I SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR $2,200.00 02832 001-400-4601-4221 00252 $784.00 07/26/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT' REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $784.00 R CITY OF *MANHATTAN BEACH MEDIAN MAINT/NOV92--JUN93 10768 00183 001-400-3101-4251 00024 $403.76 06/30/93 MEDIANS /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LYNN*MC GOVERT CITE PAYMENT REFUND =fit" "-°+`O77"'y Z. 777 .- 05247 110-300-0000-3302 06/30/93 $403.76 52770 $176.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING 32804 06754 $0.00 44671 07/29/93 07042 44672 $0.00 07/29/93 10768 06582 44673 $0.00 07/29/93 06911 44674 $0.00 07/29/93 0 • 15 in 14 21 77 21 24 77 7n 70 1, n 14 • • • • • • '17 '.1 • • IMO 1,,, r 711 7/1 • • • FINANCE—SFA340 .TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************#*******4****************************sit****tau* R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND LEGAL SERVICES/JUNE 93 PAGE 0020 DATE 08/02/93_.._ INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC . DATE.. EXP $176. 00 04138 001-400-1132-4201 00141 .$7,325.00.... 06/30/93 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. HYDRAULIC OIL/CITY YARD 30552 $7,325.00 03080 160-400-3102-4311 00229 $220.81 06/13/93 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************a***************************************** R MARK*MILLER SUMMER CLASS REFUND 05232 001-300-0000-3893 /SM14 06/30/93 $220.81 _06833_ 06833_._ . _ 44675 $0.00 07/29/93 930552 06537 44676 $0.00 07/29/93 02496 $50.00.. 60648/SM14 07027 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL_******************************************************************** R MING KUEN NG SUMMER CLASS REFUND 05251 001-300-0000-3893 /SM21 06/30/93 $50, 00 02490 $25.00 60537/SM21 07012 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MR. TORU*MITACHI CITE PAYMENT REFUND 05248 110-300-0000-3302 52771 06/30/93 $25. 00 $20. 00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION GASOLINE CHCS/JULY 93 *20. 00 00388 170-400-2103-4310 00120 $10.70 07/29/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS /MOTOR FUELS AND LURES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MONARCH BROOM MISC CHARGES/JUNE 1993 R MONARCH BROOM MISC CHARGES/JUNE 1993 $10. 70 00084 001-400-3103-4309 01532 _ $920..13 06/30/93 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00084 001-400-3103-4311 00882 $482,88 06/30/93 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 3 e 0 14 In t9 11 77 .. 44677 ..__ 07/29/93 44678 07/29/93 06910 44679 $0. 00 07/29/93 01050 44680. $0.00 07/29/93 01049 .44681. $0. 00 07/29/93 01049 $0. 00 44681 07/29/93 ti ,7 If ,n n, 4: „ 44 44 49 4,1 41 44 '2 n4 f 1 '1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND !F ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN k AMOUNT DATE INVC . PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** PAGE 0021 Ll DATE 08/02/93_ 1; INV/REF PO * CHK 4 AMOUNT UNENC .DATE. EXP__...___._ $1,403.01 R J0HN*O'ROURKE 04618 001-400-4601-4221 00253 $210.00 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/26/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** OCS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. MDT INTERFACE/TRAINING 04914 001-400-2101-4201 30324 06/30/93 POLICE R OCS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DISPATCH MAINT/93-94 30400 R OCS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DISPATCH MAINT/93-94 30400 04914 001-400-2101-4201 07/01/93 POLICE 04914 001-400-2201-4201 07/01/93 FIRE $210.00 07044 44682 $0.00 07/29/93 01302 $5,900.00 930324 06847. . . 44683 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/29/93 01309 $15,652.23 930400 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00401 110,433.16 930400 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES/STOCK R OFFICE DEPOT MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 R OFFICE DEPOT MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 04142 001-400-1208-4305 01234 06/30/93 GEN APPROP 04142 001-400-2101-4305 02018 06/30/93 POLICE 04142 001-400-4601-4305 01169 06/30/93 COMM RESOURCES $31,965.39 $559.79 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $41.52 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $50.00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $651.31 R OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVICE PUBLIC NOTICING/JULY 93 R OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVICE PUBLIC NOTICING/JULY 93 05107 001-400-1121-4323 00240 07/29/93 CITY CLERK 05107 07/29/93 001-400-4101-4201 00201 PLANNING $104.00 /PUBLIC NOTICING $436.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL.******************************************************************** R PACIFIC DELL TELEPHONE COMPUTER HOOKUPS/JUL 93 00321 001-400-2101-4304 07/01/93 POLICE $540. 00 01255 $150.15 /TELEPHONE 06848 44683 $0.00 07/29/93 06848 44683 *0.00 07/29/93 01085 44684 $0.00 07/29/93 01085 44684 $0.00 07/29/93 01085 44684 $0.00 07/29/93 01064 44685 $0.00 07/29/93 01064 44685 $0.00 07/29/93 00036 44686 $0.00 07/29/93 71 ► 76 .41 • AI • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 PAGE 0022 DATE 08/02/93 --; PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ tl ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************sr*****-n*********** ******************u******** $150.15 AMOUNT UNENC DATE._EXP----- R PACTEL CELLULAR - LA 03209 170-400-2103-4304 00103 $408.34 01053--------44687------ MOBILE PHONE CHCS/JUL 93 07/29/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TELEPHONE $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $408.34 R OFCR JOSEPH*PELKA 00950 001-400-2101-4312 02129 $81.00 .-__- . 05959------. -44688---- MEALS/POST CLASS 07/29/93 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $81.00 R ERIK ANTHONY*PENCE 05235 001-300-0000-3841 00652 $38.00 06907 44689 BOOT FEE REFUND 06/30/93 /POLICE TOWING $0.00 07/29/93 R ERIK ANTHONY*PENCE 05235 110-300-0000-3302 52772 $80.00 06907 44689 .. CITE PAYMENT REFUND 06/30/93 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************ -w.******************************************************* $118.00 R PHOENIX GROUP 02530 001-400-1206-4201 01140 5600.00 6845-00 00075 44690 SOFTWARE MAINT/APR-JUN93 45-00 06/30/93 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/29/93 R PHOENIX GROUP 02530 110-400-1204-4201 00022 $1.044.90 6849 00063.. 44690 -- OUT-OF-STATE CITES/JUN93 6849 06/30/93 FINANCE CASHIER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.644.90 R JAOUELYNN*POPE 05233 001--300-0000-3893 02495 $96.00 60658/SM1B1 07033 44691 SUMMER CLASS REFUND SM181 06/30/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * $96.00 R POSTAL ANNEX - KING HARBOR 05246 001-400-1122-4305 00180 $181.86 CANDIDATE MANUALS 1317 07/21/93 ELECTIONS /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL $181.B6 1317 03920 ._44692._ $0.00 07/29/93 R POSTMASTER 00398 001-400-4601-4305 01171 $1.200.00 07054 44693 REC BROCHURE POSTAGE 07/27/93 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 07/29/93 e 9 ,i 4 s 15 ,9 20 7' 27 2" 2" 7 20 17 ao e r c 49 10 I',tRa. 57 rp 71 Alb 41 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND IR ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN IR AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL**********+r*******n************************************************* PAGE 0023 DATE 08/02!.93_ • INV/REF PO 14 CHK * AMOUNT UNENC .._. DATE_EXP_..__ $1,200.00 R MERCEDES*PRADO r 02494 $50.00 60692/SM14 07023 ._ _ .44694._..__ SUMMER CLASS REFUND /SM14 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 30.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 05234 001-300-0000-3893 06/30/93 RADIO SHACK_ MISC. CHARGES/JULY 93 $ 50. 00 01429 001-400-2201-4309 01499 $22.14 07/29/93 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SYLVIA*ROOT SEC SERV/JULY 6, 93 R SYLVIA*ROOT SEC SERV/7-20-93 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00416 706 07/12/93 PLANNING COMM 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00417 720 07/22/93 PLANNING COMM $22.14 *275.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/FRIVAT $256.25 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BETSY*RUBINO SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR $531.25 04966 001-400-4601-4221 00254 $196.00 07/26/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC SERV/JUNE 93 $196.00 01058 44695 -. $0.00 07/29/93 706 . 05829 $0. 00 07/29/93 720 05830 44696 . $0.00 07/29/93 07047 44697 $0.00 07/29/93 01578 001-400-3104-4201 00159 $270.00 93340 06584 93340 06/30/93 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $270.00 R DIANE*SAKS SUMMER CLASS REFUND 05223 001-300-0000-3893 06/30/93 02504 $50.00 60527/SM14 /SM14 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ALIMA*SHERMAN SUMMER CLASS REFUND 05252 001-300-0000-3893 /SM21 06/30/93 $50. 00 44698 07/29/93 07022 44699 _ $0.00 07/29/93 02491 $25.00 60601/9M21 07010 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 44700 07/29/93 2 3 .7 • FINANCE—SFA340 _TIME. 10:.38:28 6�' I PAY VENDOR NAME _' DESCRIPTION +i CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND 11 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************•r******************•*****•u****.•**•v#***************** • 0.1 • . �A" 1 PAGE 0024 h, DATE 08/02/93 ._ INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC .. _....DATE EXP____ ^_ $25. 00 SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 02668 $270.46 MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 06/30/93 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** SMART &_FINAL.IRI.S_.COMPANY___ MISC CHARGES/MAY 93 SMART & FINAL IRIS_. COMPANY MISC CHARGES/JULY 93 • SMART & FINAL IRIS_COMPANY_ MISC CHARGES/JULY 93 00114 001-400-2101-4305 05/31/93 210004 POLICE 00114 001-400-2101-4306 07/29/93 POLICE $270. 46 02020 $191.37 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 01391 $196. 33 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 00114 001-400-4601-4308 00874. $61.02. 07/29/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** SO. CAL SHARPSHOOTER, INC. RANGE SERV/MAR—JUN 93 02250 001-400-2101-4201 06/30/93 POLICE $448. 72 01303 $711.22 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT .*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION JUNE EXP/R. BLACKWOOD R I SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION JULY EXP/R. BLACKWOOD $711.22 03353 001-400-1203-4201 01056 $39.94 06/30/93 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03353 001-400-1203-4201 01057 $62.13 07/12/93 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITE SURCHARGE/JUNE 93 00118 110-300-0000-3302 52773 06/30/93 $102. 07 $28,076.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $28, 076. 00 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS .00018 001-400-3103-4309 01530 $15.00 MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 06/30/93 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01061 ._. _ 44701 ___ $0.00 07/29/93 01062 44702.__ $0.00 07/29/93 01062 44702 $0.00 07/29/93 01062 44702____ $0.00 07/29/93 01068 44703 $0.00 07/29/93 05599 44704 $0. 00 07/29/93 05599 44704 $0.00 07/29/93 06906 44705 $0. 00 07/29/93 01065 44706 $0.00 07/29/93 23 741 oR ^ A , n -1(1 1.1 AI 12 211 to to f9 w '1-1' • FINANCE—SFA340 __._TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00018 001-400-3104-4309 01073 $15.00 06/30/93 PAGE 0025 DATE 08/02/93 INV/REF PO 4 CHK 4 AMOUNT UNENC --DATE EXP TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************nor**********+t* R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLINGS/JULY 1993 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLINGS/JULY 1993 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLINGS/JULY 1993 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLINGS/JULY 1993 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLINGS/JULY 1993 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELEC BILLINGS/JULY 1993 $30.00 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00285 $59.58 07/22/93 MEDIANS /UTILITIES . 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00169 $487.41 07/22/93 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00692 $8,663.83 07/22/93 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00524 $2.074.11 07/22/93 PARKS /UTILITIES 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00443 $228.35 07/22/93 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00238 $80.76 07/22/93 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ST. LITE BILLS/JUNE 93 $11.594.04 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00442 $8,507.59 06/30/93 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. GAS BILLINGS/JULY 93 $8.507.59 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00693 .$186.89 07/29/93 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO DOWNTOWN MAINT/JUNE 93 2963 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************4****************************************** $186.89 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00479 . __$3.075.00 ._ 06/30/93 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R SPORTMART MISC CHARGES/JUNE 93 $3,075.00 03479 001-400-4601-4308 00870 ,341.09 7597 06/30/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 01065 44706 $0.00 07/29/93 01065 44707 $0.00 07/29/93 01065 44707 $0.00 07/29/93 01065 44707 $0.00 07/29/93 01065 44707 $0.00 07/29/93 01065 44707 $0.00 07/29/93 01065 44707 ..._ $0.00 07/29/93 00012 44708 --- $0.00 . --- . $0.00 07/29/93 01067 . 44709 .. $0.00 07/29/93 .2963 .00027 . $0.00 44710 .. 07/29/93 7597 01069 44711 $0.00 07/29/93 41 44 4.1 4, 4„ 11, a., a5 71 ! FINANCE-SFA340 ,I ••' TIME 10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 PAGE 0026 DATE 08/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINT APPS/JUN 93 21762 R STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONCEALED WPN APPS/JUN93 21762 00364, 001-400-2101-4251 00506 06/30/93 POLICE 00364 001-400-2101-4251 06/30/93 POLICE $41. 09 $189.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00507 $37.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SUMITOMO BANK LEASE PAYMENT/AUGUST 93 3226. 00 04751 001-400-3104-6900 001.29 $855.11 07/29/93 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SUN BADGE COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/JULY 93 R SUN BADGE COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/JULY 93 00806 001-400-2201-4187 07/29/93 FIRE $855. 11 00360 $114,42 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00806 110-400-3302-4187 00427 $197.95 07/29/93 - PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R STANLEY*SUTOR ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 64648 R STANLEY*SUTOR ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 64648 05236 001-210-0000-2110 05412 07/22/93 $312. 37 $50. 00 . /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 05236 001-300-0000-3895 00100 07/22/93 $7. 70CR /ANIMAL TRAP FEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. FILMS/COMM RES CAMPS 08105 $42. 30 921762 00023 $0.00 921762 00230 44712 07/29/93 44712 $0. 00 07/29/93 00066 44713 $0.00 07/29/93 01070 44714 $0. 00 07/29/93 01070 44714 $0. 00 07/29/93 64648 06759 44715 $0. 00 07/29/93 64648 06759 44715 $0.00 07/29/93 03158 001-400-4601-4308 00872 $331.00. 607051/608105 06620 44716 07/12/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TECHCRAFT REP/COUNCIL SOUND SYS $331. 00 ' 04949 001-400-4204-4201 00598 $65.00 H0766 06565 H0766 06/28/93 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 44717 07/29/93 • • 410 0 • • • • • en « • wx, 1,4 J 4' 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 10:38:28 9414, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0027 FOR 08/02/93 DATE 08/02/93 ._ PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL************'I**********************************************aa**,**** INV/REF PO # CHK Ik AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $65.00 R TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION, INC. 03421 001-400-2101-4201 01305 *200.00 1167 00069 44718 COMPUTER TUNING/JUNE 93 1167 06/30/93 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $200.00 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-202-0000-2021 00452 44.53 01073 44719.._..._ DISCOUNT OFFERED 07/22/93 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 07/29/93 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-202-0000-2022 00450 *4.53CR 01073 44719 DISCOUNT TAKEN 07/22/93 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN *0.00 07/29/93 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 125-400-8506-4309 00086 . $222.05 01073._ 44719 ..... MISC CHARGES/JULY 93 07/22/93 PRK, REC IMPROV /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R CITY OF*TORRANCE AREA "G" SHARE/FY 93-94 09592 VENDOR TOTAL 00841 07/01/93 001-400-2701-4251 00041 $222.05 $2,343.13 CIVIL DEFENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ******************************************************************** $2,343.13 109592 06209 44720 ..._... 80.00 07/29/93 R UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE 04768 001-400-1206-4201 01143 #1,080.00 9610 00009 44721 COMPUTER SYS MAINT/AUG93 9610 07/29/93 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 07/29/93 .*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1, 080. 00 R JOHN*VAN DEN EYKEL _ 03374 001-400-4601-4221 00255 $280.00 07045 44722 .. SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/26/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 50.00 07/29/93 ***.,.VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** .... $280..00 R MICHAEL*WICEN 05238 001-300-0000-3893 02492 530.00 _ 63447/YSM17 07032 44723 ._ SUMMER CLASS REFUND YSM17 06/30/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL *30.00 R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH 05125 001-400-2101-4305 02021 $31.25 06760 44724 PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-21 07/22/93 POLICE /OFFICE OPER. SUPPLIES 80.00 07/29/93 'P 2) "R 79 f' 4„ 4, 47 4a 44 4'1 4R 47 48 49 'f 0 S, nr I r1 I FINANCE-SFA340 __TIME .10:38:28 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-21 R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-21 R R R R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-21. JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-21 JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-21 JOHN M.#WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-21 JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/7-1 TO 7-21 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 08/02/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 05125 001-400-2101-4311 07/22/93 POLICE 01661 $10.91 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 05125 001-400-2101-4312 02128 07/22/93 POLICE 05125 001-400-2101-4316 01043 07/22/93 POLICE 05125 001-400-4202-4305 00777 07/22/93 PUB WKS ADMIN PAGE 0028 - -DATE .08/02/93 INV/REF PO 11 CHK k AMOUNT UNENC-. . DATE EXP -..---.- $24. 00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST 06760 44724 -- 30.00 07/29/93 06760 44724 -- 30.00 07/29/93 $61.00 . 06760 44724 /TRAINING $0.00 07/29/93 $21.72 06760 44724 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 07/29/93 05125 001-400-4204-4309 02670 $25.00 07/22/93 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 05125 001-400-4601-4305 01170 $75.88 07/22/93 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 05125 001-400-4601-4308 00871 $118.61 07/22/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TRACY*YATES REIMB TUITION/FALL 93 $368.37 04268 001-400-4202-4316 00276 $192.00 07/21/93 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R SANDRA*ZIELKE SUMMER CLASS REFUND /YSM1 05239 001-300-0000-3893 06/30/93 $192. 00 06760 44724 $0.00 07/29/93 06760 __ 44724 $0.00 07/29/93 06760 44724 $0.00 07/29/93 06588 44725 $0.00 07/29/93 02493 $30.00 .. 63491/YSM1 07034 44726 .._.__ /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 07/29/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $30. 00 $234,536.92 $577,900.05 • • • 40 2! 2? 70 1 a Y • a `• nn n1; A. 411 .70 w f HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR cups COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON P S TO'1 L. INCLUSIVE, OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FORARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. lf� BY FINANCE IRECTOR DATE "w tot . i. 11r CITY OF..HERMOSABEACH = 3 1.79 FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 00011 TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 z 3 4 'PAY ' 9 VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD 5 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • 5 6 7 B .8 ..PLAQUES/ENGRAVING_JUL-93 R A & E TROPHIES 02744 001-400-1101-4319 00163 $60.46 00102 44730 07/31/93 CITY__COUNCII /SPECIAI FVFNTS 10 ,1 12 10 12 $0 00— 08/05/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********'********************************************************* $60.46 3 s 16 13 t5 R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 00138 001-400-2101-4187 00547 $593.06 11092 06818 44731 PEPPER SPRAY CANISTER$__11Q22 06/29/93 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCF 7 n19 20 ° '17 18 $0 00 08/05/93 R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 00138 001-400-2101-4187 00548 $560.20 06818 44731 PEPPER SPRAY CANISTERS 07/02/93_ POLICE /VIYIEORM ALLOWANCE 21 22 23 24 0 2' $0 00_ 08L05/91 R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 00138 001-400-2101-4309 00640 $53.06 11399 00103 44731 RADAR REPAIR/JULY 93 11399 07/19/93 POLICE z^ 26 27 26 e230 24 .LMAINIENANCE_MATERIALS $0 00 08/05/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,206.32 20 31 32 25 27 ADVANCE ELEVATOR 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00601 $90.00 31106 00003 44732 ELEVATOR MAINT/AUG 93 31106 08/01/93 BLDG—M ,INT /CIIN.IRACI_SERVICE/PRIVAT 33 3.135 20 30 $0 00_08/05193 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $90.00 36 37 33,7 40 31 .32 31 R AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 00854 001-400-4101-4315 00183 $178.00 048765 05831 44733 ANNUAL DUES/M:._SCHUBACH 48765 07/31/93 PLANNING /MEMBERSHIP 41 43 e4 35 36 _., $0 00__08/_05/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $178.00 4`_ 41 46 37 38 '^ R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01399 571.75 8088 00105 44734 PRISONER MEALS/JULY 93 8088 07/31/93 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 49 50 51 40 41 42 $0.00_08,405493__r *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $71.75 53 554 5 56 43 44 45 R BANNER STATIONERS 01897 001-400-4202-4305 00779 555.81 45659 06590 44735 OFFICE SUPP/PUB WORKS 45639 06/30/93 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 57 55• 46 47 48 $Q�00_Q8L05/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $55.81 bo 61 62 63• 64 49 50 61 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 001-400-1212-4188 02784 $40.36 00055 44736 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 65 66 68 52 53 54 $0_00_08/05193 69 70 1 71 _,572 56 7 73 74' 7. .1: J 1 (40 .J' d J 9 1 • 31 3 34 35 35 37 30 40 41 42 43 44 45 w 47 48 49 5c 51 52 53 54 55 6 r ' 2 3 FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 PAGE 0002 DATE 08/05/93 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 110-400-1204-4188 00099 $1.04 CITYHEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 /FME Q EF RENEELTS 00055 44736 $0 00 08/05/93 __.______—_FINANCE_CASHIER *** VENDOR TOTAL *********•u***mit• ****t►i►**********atarit****x•trugt#•»•uat** tit*irtr*nitat**atitat•r**art $41. 40 R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 00163 001-400-2101-4306 01398 $225.55 PRISONER LAUNDRYL JUL 93 70664 07/31193 POLICE /PRTRf1NER_MAINIENANCF 070664 01010 44737 $0 00-08/05/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $225.55 R BROOKES ELECTRIC 00355 001-400-4204-4201 00600 $525.38 GAS EMERGSWITCH_REPAIR_13313 06/30/93_________.._. BLDG__MAINT /CONTRACT SER_VICE/PRZVAT 13313 06520 44738 $125_.00-08/05/93 ____.. *** VENDOR-TOTAL******************************************************************** $525.38 ' R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 001-400-1208-4201 01029 $610.13 TRASH PJCKUELAUGUST_23 08/01/91 GEN AEEROP /C.f]NIRACT SERMICELPRIVAT 00005 44739 $O 00 08/05/93— 00005 44739 $O._.00-08/05/93 R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 109-400-3301-4201 00195 $360.12 TRASH PICKLIELAUCUST 93 08101/33 VEH EKGJtST /CrINTRACT SFRVICF/PRTVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $970.25 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 001-400-1212-4188 02778 $851.99 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00041 44740 $0_00_13B105/93 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 105-400-2601-4188 01478 $35.27 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 STREET_LI_GHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00041 44740 $0 0Q-08/05/_93 00041 44740 $0.0_08L05L9.3 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 109-400-3301-4168 00419 $1.38 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/3 VER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS _PKG_DIST R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 110-400-1204-4188 00096 $45.93 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 FINANCE CASHIER.LEMQLOYEE BENEELTS _ 00041 44740 $0.00_08/05193 ' R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN , 00238 110-400-3302-4188 01756 $75.13 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 • ' 08/02/93 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00041 44740 $0 Q0 08L04/92 ' R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 160-400-3102-4188 01460 $26.55 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08102/93 SEWERLSLDRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00041 44740 $0 00_ 08105/93 ' I rV FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0003 z TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 3 1 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK # a 5 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC " PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 7 6 n n R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 705-400-1209-4188 00746 $4.58 00041 44740 II CITY HEALTH INS/AUG_93 08/02493 LIABILLTY_INS. /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0 00 08/05/.93 12 13 1a R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 705-400-1217-4188 00833 $6.87 00041 44740 15 2 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 Q8/02/93 WORKERS_COMP /EMPLOYEE BENFFITS $0 00_08/_05/93 16 17 16 ,*** VENDOR TOTAL*********•*********************************************************** $1,047.70 19 I'' ' 20 IC 21 22 17 R CALBO ABM 02101 001-400-4201-4305 00880 $15.95 04295 44741 23 'n PUBLICATIONS/BUILDING 07/01/93 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0 00 08L05/93 24 g 25 26 2. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $15.95 27 21 28 2 29 30 3 R CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 00262 110-400-3302-4305 01001 $243.56 36381 06836 44742 31 PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGNS 36381 07/16/93 PARKING_ENF /OFFI_CE OPER SUPPLIES $Q__00_08L05/93 32 33 34 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $243.56 35 27 36 25 37 30 R CANADA LIFE 00046 001-400-1212-4188 02783 $588.98 00008 44743 39 79 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEELTS $0_00 08/05/93 A0 31 41 42 17 R CANADA LIFE 00046 170-400-2103-4188 00451 $96.75 00008 44743 43 =7_ CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93SPEC INVESTGTNS_LEMPLOYEEDENEEITS_ $0 00 08/05/.93__ 44 . 45 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $685.73 467 " 48 37 49 50 311 R JEANNE*CARUSO 03293 001-400-2101-4316 01045 $127.53 06857 44744 51 ^' REIMB MATERIALS/SUMMER93 08/04/93 POLICE /TRAINING $0 00 0B/05/93._1, 53 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $127.53 55 42 56 4.7 57 56 4't R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 01665 $136.40 25659 01013 44745 53 A5 AUTO PARTS/JULY 93 25659 07/31/93POLICE /&UTOJ1AINTEQIANCE $0 00 08/05/93 "O 46 61 62 A7 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET , 00014 001-400-3101-4311 00063 $5.85 25449 01013 44745 63 40 AUTO PARTS/JULY 93 . 25449 '.07/31/93 MEDIANS /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0-00 08/05/93 84 49 65 Or 50 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $142.25 67 51 1- 52 69 53 R CHEVRON USA, INC. 00634 170-400-2103-4310 00122 $293.15 1417284419 01015 44746 7, 54 WESTNET GASOLINE/JUL 93 84419 07/31/93 SPECINVVES QTNS /MOTPR FUELS AND LUBES $0 00 08/05193 72 65 73 74 5' • /6 57 J`/ y y :7 4119 40. FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LISTv PAGE 0004 TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 111 3 a 5 7 0 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT • INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ,c *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $293.15 12 3 14 R THE *COPY SHOP 00022 001-400-2201-4305 00633 $243.56 06205 44747 /5 12 FIRE INSPECTION_ FORMS 07/08/93. FIRE ' . ._.__ _—/OFFICE_OP_ER_SUPPLIES_ _.._..._ _ _____$0_00—._.08/05/93. 17 14 16 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $243.56 19 1S 20 i6 21 17 22 R DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. CLINIC 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00454 $458.00 004971-00 07106 44748 23 16 EMPLOYEE EXAMS/JUNE 93 71-00 06/30/93_____..____......_. /P.RE-EMPLOYMENT—EXAMS_—_—___—_._$0_.00______08/05/_93 '4� _PERSONNEL__ -= *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $458.00 z: 21 26 • 2, 23 30 R DANIEL FREEMAN MEMORIAL HOSP. 00047 ' 001-400-1203-4320 00455 $400.00 80000162-0017 07108 44749 31 24 ANNUAL PHYSICAL/STRASER —0017 06/30/93 PERSONNEL /ERE—EMELOYMEI'1LEXAMS $0_00_08105L9 2c 27 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $400.0011 23 3 7 23 3^. R ' J3 DATA SAFE 00156 001-400-1206-4201 01149 $15.00 73811 00015 44750 39 TAPE STORAGE/THRU 6/30 73811 06/30/93 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACLSERVICE/PRLVAT $0 00_08L05/9 4• 3, 41 32 42 R DATA SAFE 00156 001-400-1206-4201 01150 $161.50 73811 00015 44750 43 31 TAPE STOR/JUL 11—AUG 10_73811 _07/11/93DATA_.PROCESSING—LCONTRACT SERVICEL_P_RIVAL$0_00___08/05/93___1A 31 ____ _$000._08/05/_93.—°_4_ 45 35 36 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $176.50 47 48 17 49 39 R DENN ENGINEERS 05094 115-400-8144-4201 00021 $2,100.00 93-048 06580 44751 0 51 37 BIKEWAY SERV/JULY 93 3-048 08/03/93 STRAND WALL/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE $0 00 08/05/93__!! 43 53 41 54 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,100.00 55 42 58 43 57 64 R 58 43 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 00049 001-300-0000-3204 03049 $299.72 07205 44752 SEISMIC FEES/APR—JUN 93 06/30/93 /DWI PERMITS $0 00_08105/91 59 60 46 -RING 61 47 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 62 48 $299.72 63 64 49 65 50 DESK 60 51 CITY 01097 001-400-4202-5401 00049 $541.25 4096 06571 44753 DESK CHAIRS/PUB WORKS 4096 07/15/93 PUB WKS ADMLNLEQ(LLFMEN.I-_LESS_THANI $500 $0 00 61 66 52 _08L05/.91 69 53 70 54 71 72 55 73 56 74 7 75 7,9' :7 4119 40. CITY OF HERMOSA—BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0005 TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 2 3 5 6 7 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP . *** VENDOR TOTAL *********eta►******************************************************** ' $541.25 10 11 12 R GARY H.*DI BLASIO. MD 05267 001-300-0000-3893 02585 $20.00 63526 07013 44754 SUMMER CLASS_REFUND 63526______06430/93 /CONTR RFCRFATTnN_CLASSES $0 13 14 15 1E . 00-08/-05L93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 17 lo 19 20 = 17 R EASTMAN. INC. 02514 001-400-1208-4305 01239 $231.39 01024 44755 •EEICE SUP_EL TOC! IUL_/3 07131193 GEN_APFROP /OFFTCF OPFR SIJPPLIF4 $0_00-08/05/93 21 22 23 24 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $231.39 25 27 28 ` R EFRAM MOBIL 01400 001-400-2101-4310 00414 $74.28 363811 01028 44756 MOTORS GASOL.INEL38JLY 93_63811 07/31193 POLICF LMOTOR FIlFI S ANn I ItRFR 29 30 3, 32 -7 $0_-00-08/05193 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $74.28 33 34 5 36 =' 36 R JAMES*ELLISON 05268 001-300-0000-3894 00488 $25.00 63572 07019 44757 SUMMEg__BLAST REFUND 63572 Q6L30L93 /OTHER RFC[RFATTON—P.RQQPJ 37 38 39 40 71 r. S _ $0_O0-0810513 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $25.00 41 42 43 44 r„, R FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN . 04963 001-400-1212-4188 02779 $10.787.21 00056 44758 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 EMP RENEE TS /EMELOYEE—BENEFITS $0_03lD8L05/93 45 4647 48 " R FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 04963 105-400-2601-4188 01479 $113.94 00056 44758 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 STREET__.LIGHT_ING_LEMELOYEE_BENEFITS $0 49 0 5, 53 54 ss• 56 37 58 59 _ 61 62 63, 65 67 60 .S1 .12 00-08/95L93-52 R FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 04963 109-400-3301-4188 00420 $28.49 00056 44758 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 0802/93 VEH EKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENFFITR$(1 on nA/05/9^1 14 IM15 R FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 04963 110-400-1204-4188 00097 $379.80 00056 44758 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 Q8/02/93_ FINANCE_CASHIER /EMP_LOYEE—BENFFITS $Q 00_08!05/93-60 46 t7 '1p R FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN ,04963 110-400-3302-4188 01757 $189.90 00056 44758 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 • 08/02/93 PARKING_ENF /EMPLOYEE_.ENEFITS $0-00___08L09/9169 5' S1 R FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 04963 160-400-3102-4188 01461 $161.42 00056 44758 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08(021_93 SEWERfST_DRAIN /EMeLOYEF_BENFFITS $0 i2 53 54 00 08L05L33— 69 70 71 • 72 ' 73 74 75 • 7, y J J y J J J J J e 411. 4► • • r I FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0006 2 TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 3 . :— ----- 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT • INV/REF PO # CHK # 6 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 7 e 3 1n R FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 04963 170-400-2103-4188 00449 3521.77 00056 44758 11 11 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 Q8/02/93—_.._____.._...___..__..___SPEC_.INVESTOTNS LEMELnYFF BENFFITS 30 00 08/05/93. 12 3 14 R FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 04963 705-400-1217-4188 00834 394.95 00056 44758 13 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 WORKERS__COMP /EMELOYEE 2ENEE TS 30 00.___08/05L91 f5 16 14 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***********************int*#****************#************************ 312,277.48 19 20 21 22 t7 R FRIDEN NEOPOST 05269 001-400-1208-4201 01030 31,330.54 08083 44759 23 POSTAGE METER MAINT/FY94 07/01/93 GEN_APPROP /CONTRACT SERVIC.ELEBIYAT $0_00_ .08L05/93 24 25 26 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***- *******************int******************#************************ 31, 330. 54 27 21 213 29 30 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 001-400-1212-4188 02786 3542.94 00028 44760 31 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30 00___08L0519.3_21 33 34 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 105-400-2601-4188 01482 317.53 00028 44760 35 27 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 Q8/02/93STREET_.LIGHT_INGJEMP_LOYEE-BENEFITS 30 00 08/.05/.93 36 „1 37 =3 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 109-400-3301-4188 00423 30.51 00028 44760 3'3 '0 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02493 VEH_PAQ_DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30 00-08L05/93_-12 31 41 42 22 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 110-400-1204-4188 00101 323.09 00028 44760 43 23 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 9308/02/93 FINANCE CASHIERJEMPLOYEE._BENEF_LTS 30..00._._._08/05/93 44 ;, ---- - ..- ___ 45 = R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 110-400-3302-4188 01760' 337.77 00028 44760 46 47 36 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 PARKING ENF /EMPLO ENEFITS $0_00___08/.05L93 40 37 49 50 20 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 155-400-2102-4188 00946 30.58 00028 44760 51 2' CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00_._08/05/93.__ 52 .3 34 41 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 160-400-3102-4188 01464 313.06 00028 44760 5s 42 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0_00_08/.05 - 56 43 57 58 i4 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 170-400-2103-4188 00452 323.01 00028 44760 59 5 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 SPEC /EMPLOYEEBENEFITS 30 00..— 08/05/93.._13 _ 2 ..INVESTGTNS 62 47 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 705-400-1209-4188 00749 31.84 00028 44760 63 46 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 . .•08/02/93 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30 00_08/05/9 64 49 05 9 R GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 04397 705-400-1217-4188 00837 32.99 00028 44760 G5 67 71 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 WORKERS__COMP $0.00.__....08/05/93.__ 66 52 _.,1__EMeLOYEE_.BENEF.ITS 69 70 53 71 54 72 55 73 74 56 I 75 7 29 e 411. 4► • • r I r r 3 ..�' 1/29 FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0007 TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 z` 3 a 6 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # 'ACCOUNTIDESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 s � 8 i **# VENDOR TOTAL****•r***•t•►***#***************#*#***********•r****#*#****#******+►***** $663. 32 9 ,1 1z '2 13 14 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00575 $5.64 01030 44762 15 PHONE/FAX CHGS/JULY 43 07/31/93__._._.._.___.__ CITY COUNCIL /TELEEHONF 1 $ " $0 OQ-08/05/_93—_F 17 1° R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00647 $17.30 01030 44762 19 PHONE/FAX CHGS/JULY 93 07/31/93 CITY CLERK /TELEEHONF 1c , 7 ° $0. 00.—_..08/05/93 70 21 22 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00483 $7.00 01030 44762 23 PHONE/FAX CHGS/JULY 93 07/31j93 C ITY._AUDR NEY—/TELEEHONE ,,R ' ..—_ $0 00___08/05/93-2° 2: GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00668 $13.80 01030 44762 27 PHONE/FAX CHGS/JULY 93 07/31/93 I_T._Y._IREASURER_LIELEEHONE , 3 ,° _C $0 00 08/05/93 2° 29 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 ' 001-400-1201-4304 00720 $14.42 01030 44762 31 PHONE/FAX CHCS/JULY 93 07/31/93 CITY MANAGER /TELEE ONE 32 •"' 27 $0 00 08/_05/_93 33 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00720 $54.95 01030 44762 334 5 PHONE/FAX CHCS/JULY 93 07/31/93 /TELEEHONE _9 39 __FINANCE_ADMIN $0 00 08/05/93___1S 37 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00730 $39.71 01030 44762 39' PHONE/FAX CHCS/JULY 93 07 31j93_ PERSONNEL /TELEPHONF 3 1 72 33 _ $0_OQ—�8L05/93 4' 41 42 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00651 $141.45 01030 44762 43 PHONE/FAX CHCS/JULY 93 07/31/93 DATAPROCESSING_LTELEP_HONE 3.1 35 6 $0.00—__.08/_05/93 44 4` 5 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00521 $16.27 01030 44762 44'; 47' PHONE/FAX CHGS/JULY 93 07/31/93 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 37 70 3' $0.00_08L051 48 49 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1208-4304 00311 $7.24 01030 44762 510 • PHONE/FAX CHCS/JULY 93 07/31/93 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE 4.7 41 42 $0._00_08/05/_93__ 32 53 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 01262 $684.56 01030 44762 s54 s. PHONE/FAX CHCS/JULY 93 07/31/93 POLICE /TELEPHONE - 56 43 44 45 $0_00_08 • R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00553 $71.83 01030 44762 PHONE/FAX CHGS/JULY 93 07/31/93 FIRE /TELEEHONE 4G A7 46 $0 00 98/05/93_..' R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00555 $8.99 01030 44762 PHONE/FAX CHGS/JULY 93 . '• 07/31/93 ANIMAL—CONTROL /TELEPHONE - 49 30 S1 $Q,0Q 08L05 6r 66 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00722 $68.00 01030 44762 0, PHONE/FAX CHGS/JULY 93 Q7/31/93 /TEL.EPfiQNE 52 53 54 yr S •, 0 ) f I A J • t ' it 55 56 y .v J J afr 12 13 FINANCE–SFA340 ~DEMAND LISTVy�� TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 PAGE 0008 a DATE 08/05/93 3 PO # CHK # 6 UNENC DATE EXP 7 e I''I k PAY ;VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 9 If 'R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00653 $91.86 01030 44762 11 PHONE/FAXCHGS/JULY 93 07/31/93 BUILDING / PHONF $0 00.--08/05/93 I3 14 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00784 $163.07 01030 44762 15 PHONEL_EAX CHGSLSLULY_93 07/31L93 PUB WKS_1DMIN /TFLEPHONF $000 08/05193 1a R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00732 $38.37 01030 44762 19 PHONE/_FAX_CHGSL.LULY_43 07131L93 /RUSLDING_SAEFTY/SECURIT $0.00--08/05/93 2O 1[ ___ ___...-.BLDG__MAINT 21 22 7 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00831 $88.26 01030 44762 23 111 PHONE/FAX—CHG.S/JULY 93 071.31_!33 COMM_ RESOURCES_ /TELEPHONF $0 00-08/05/93 24 25 26 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00519 $7.00 01030 44762 27 PHONE/FAXCHGS/JULY 93 07/31/_93 PARKS /TELEPHONE $0.00.—_._...08/05/93 2O _________. _.. 2, 30 – R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-1204-4304 00049 $69.61 01030 44762 31 z4 PHONE/FAX CHGS/JULY 93 071.31/93 /TELEPHONE $0 00_08105493- _FINANCE_CASHIER 33 34 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00745 $57.08 01030 44762 35 '7 PHONE/FAX CiHGS/JULY 93 07131L93 PARKING ENF /TFI FP 4%1NE $0 DO 08/05/93 36 e 37 36 =3 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,666.41 39 3 40 JI 41 ,- R GTEL 01340 001-400-2101-4304 01263 $318.69 AS08941 42 05677 44763 43 PHONE CHANGES/POLICE 08941 07/10/93 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0 00-08/05/.93 44 3s 45 46 35 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $318.69 47 7a 48 37 49 50 36 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 001-400-1212-4188 02780 $2,982.17 00001 44764 51 3" CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 EMP_.BENEEITS /EMELOYEE_BENEFIT9_ S0 00_08/.05/9 3___...7,1 10 53 54 41 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 105-400-2601-4188 01480 $21.29 00001 44764 55 42 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 STREET LIGHIING /EMPLOYEE BENFFTTS $Q-00_08105/9/ 56 4" 5l 44 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 109-400-3301-4188 00421 $3.95 5e 00001 44764 5a 45 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 Q8/02/93 VEH PKG DI$T /EMJ OYEE_BENEFITS $0_00_08/05/93 °O ,. 61 62 47 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 110-400-1204-4188 00098 $122.07 00001 44764 63 49 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 FINANCE_S.ASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0 00_08159/9:3 64 49 6., 66 50 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 110-400-3302-4188 01758 $23.54 00001 44764 67 51 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08L02/93 PARKING ENF /EMP.L.OYEE BENEFITS $0 Q0—Q8L05133 63 52 69 70 53 71 54 72 5.. 73 74 " 75 L7 L L v -11 J FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009 TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 i 3 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND it ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO 8 CHK 8 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT•DESCRIPTION ' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP e 7 9 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 155-400-2102-4188 00945 85.65 00001 44764 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 CROSSING_GUARDJEMELQYEE_BENEFITR 80 9 10 I, 12 10 f2 00-08/_05193- R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 160-400-3102-4188 01462 829.31 00001 44764 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 SEWER/_ST_DRALN_/EMPLOYEE_BENEFITS 3 14 15 l6 i 1.1 5 80 00_08L05L91 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 170-400-2103-4188 00450 867.76 - 00001 44764 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02//3 SPEC INVES1 TNS /EMPLOYEE 9ENEFITS '7 10 re 20 I6 10 80 00_0P/O5/93 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00747 833.52 00001 44764 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 LIABILITY INS /EMNPLOYEE_BENEFITS 80 00_.08L05L9'1 21 22 23 24 1'0 21 25 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00835 850.28 00001 44764 27 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93WORKERS COMP /EMP_LOYEE_BENEELTS 26 22 - 80 00_08/05/_93 29 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************* 43, 339.54 30 31 32 27 33 34 R HEALTHNET 00241 001-400-1212-4188 02787 818,532.14 00016 44765 35 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/13 EMP_BENEFITS /EMEL.OYEE_BENEELIS 80 00_08/05/_9'1 3° 37 39 R HEALTHNET 00241 105-400-2601-4188 01483 8913.16 00016 44765 39' CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 Q8/02/93 STREELLIGHTING /EMPLOYEE_BENEFITS 40 3 1 32 80 QQ_Q8LQ5/9'1 41 42 R HEALTHNET 00241 110-400-1204-4188 00102 8556.20 00016 44765 43 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93FINANCE CASHIER_LEMPLOYEE_BENEEITS y 15 3' 80 00___.08/05/.93 44 45 R HEALTHNET 00241 110-400-3302-4188 01761 41,534.37 00016 44765 ne 4,' CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 PARKING ENF /EMPLQYEE_DENEFITS 4SLQ0 09105/93 48 37 39 33 49 R HEALTHNET 00241 155-400-2102-4188 00947 823.98 00016 44765 50 51 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE._ BENEFITS 40 41 t2 _._ 80 00 08/05/93 '2 53 54 R HEALTHNET 00241 160-400-3102-4188 01465 8463.50 00016 44765 55` CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 56 3 44 45 $Q,Q0 0$1_05/93 57 8 R HEALTHNET 00241 170-400-2103-4188 00453 8276.72 00016 44765 53 • CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 SPEC-_INVESTGTN$_LEMPLQYEE_PENEE.IT.S 4 6 47 46 .. _ 80 00_08/_051-93.__ 6' 61 62 R HEALTHNET . 00241 705-400-1209-4188 00750 4169.18 00016 44765 63, CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 . ' 08/02/13 LIABILITY INS /EMPLQYEE_BE1EEI_TS 49 50 51 $0_00___08105L93 64 G5 •66 R HEALTHNET 00241 705-400-1217-4188 00838 8169.18 00016 44765 67 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/932__,_.____ COMP__LEMPJ..OYEE_BENEFITS. 53 54 .WORKERS 80.00__..08LQ5/93—? FINANCE-SFA340 CITY.OF HERMOSA_BEACH PAGE 0010 TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 3 H ! 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT • INV/REF PO # CHK # 6 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 7 9 T. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $22.638.43 II 12 13 14 R HOLLYWOOD BOWL 04642 001-400-4601-4201 01852 8440.00 25-277772 06695 44766 15 TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP ZZ772 07/31/_93.__.....___.__. COMM. RESOURCES_/_CON.TRACI_SERVICELP.RIVAT___. .___.__ $0.00_08/05/93___ .16 ,P. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 8440.00 19 20 17 21 22 R INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK 01484 705-400-1210-4201 00113 817,206.00 07102 44767 23 AUTO/PROP DAMAGE—FY93-94 07/27/93 AUTO/PROPIBONDSJ_CONTRAI_.SER.V_ICE1PRIVAT_________.$0. 00-____ 08/05/93. 2n. 21 2E R INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK 01484 705-400-1217-4201 00170 811,704.00 07102 44767 27 EXCESS WORK COMP/FY93-94 07/27/93 WORKERSCOMP_LCDNTRACT SERVICELf RI.VAT $0 00 _08L05/93____ 23 I. 20 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $28.910.00 31 12 27 33 34 R INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP, INC. 05254 001-400-2101-4201 01325 8915.60 0793/0893 00077 44768 3.. DISPATCH MAINT/JUL—AUG93 /0893 08/01(93 POLICE_ /CONTRACLSERVICELERI_VAL $0 00 08/05/93 3E .a 2'' 70 37 36 R INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP, INC. 05254 001-400-2201-4201 00412 8610.40 0793/0893 00077 44768 39 DISPATCH MAINT/JUL—AUG93 /0893 08/01/93 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0__00-08L05/93 4Q 11 -• 13 41 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 81.526.00 42 44 15 14 45 R INFOSYSTEMS COMPUTER CENTER 05178 001-400-1206-5402 00054 8988.79 126812 06689 44769 47 COMPUTER EQUIP/COMM RES 26812 07/26/93 DATA PROCESSING /EQUIP—MORE r1AN 8500 $0_90O8L05/93 46 37 36 33 49 50 R INFOSYSTEMS COMPUTER CENTER 05178 001-400-1206-5402 00055 $4,813.95 127020 06669 44769 51 COMPUTER EQUIP/COMM_ RES_ 27020 07/26/93. P=MORE_IHAN_$500 $0 00 08/05/93.— S2 :3 41 42 ._,.. __. _ -,DATA ._PROCESS.Ij)IG_[EQU.I 53 5., *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $5.802.74 55 56 43 A4 45 57 59 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-202-0000-2021 00459 $3.09 01037 44770 53 DISCOUNT OFFERED 07/31/93 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0 00 08/05/93___' 46 47 40 61 62 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-202-0000-2022 00457 83.09CR 01037 44770 63 DISCOUNT TAKEN '•07/31/93 /DISCOUNT$ TAIEN $0-001___08L05/93 64 49 50 S1 63 66 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-4204-4309 02675 8103.92 60523 01037 44770 c7 MISC ELEC SUPP/JUNE 93 60523 06/23/93 BLDG_MAINT /MALNIENANCE_MAIERIALS 80 90_ 08L05L92 60 S2 53 54 61 70 71 72 55 56 ...7 73 74 75 lk 41. dr 'r .10 ✓ 6 8 2 2 2 3 3 3: 3 3 3 37 30 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 0 49 50 51 52 53 54 5 56 7 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:02:01 DEMAND LIST FOR 08/05/93 PAGE 0011 DATE 08/05/93 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC_ELEC__SUP_P_/_JULY_93 02458 001-400-4204-4309 02676 $151.75 07/31193- BLDG MAINT /MA..INTENANCE_MATERIALS 01037 44770 $0.00-08/05/93 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC STREEI_LIGHI_BUL8S 60411 02458 105-400-8201-4309 00077 $2,131.23 06130193 0i LMAINTFNANCE MATFRIN S 60411 06513 44770 $2.-131 23-08105/93 *** VENDOR __CIE_85 TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,386.90 R LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. PARKS_1AINT/JUNE 93 10566 04303 001-400-6101-4201 00323 $8,585.50 06130L93_ PARKS /MNTRACT SFRVTCF/PR1_VAT 10566 00073 44771 $0 00-08/05493 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $8,585.50 I I R LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON LEGAL $ERV/.JOE 33 02175 ' 001-400-1203-4201 01063 $3,598.75 06L30/93 PERSONNEL LCONTRACT SFRVICF/PRTVAT 07105 44772 $0-00--08/-a51-93- 0'00081193_*** ***VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3.598.75 R LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT TUITION/T. THOMPSON 00718 001-400-2101-4312 02139 $100.00 08/_Q1143 POLICE /TRAVFJ FXPFNSF . PfGT $100.00 05962 44773 $0_.00-08105/93- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LAURA*LUEKE SUMMER CLASS REFUND 63660 05259 001-300-0000-3893 02588 $45.00 07/21/93 /CONIR RECRFATION CLASSFR $45.00 63660 07039 44774 $0_0.0_031 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MANHATTAN FORD AUTO PARTS/JUNE 93 38034 00605 001-400-2101-4311 01664 $134.68 06/28(j3 EOLLCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 138034 01046 44775 $4-00lBL05/9'3 R MANHATTAN FORD AUTO PARTS/JULY 93 39207 00605 001-400-6101-4311 00314 $52.43 07/31/93 PARKS 1AVIQ11AINIENANCE 139207 01046 44775 . $0_010_08/05/92_J t *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $187.11 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. GASOLINE/CITY YARD 30777 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00231 $3,167.89 01.13131 /GASOLINE INVENTORY 930777 06587 44776 t $Q D0 08L05L93-_' t , J 1 9 10 II 14 v 15 V 16 I0 19 20 21 22 23 J/ 24 25 26 27 20 2 30 31 3 3 3 35 3 3 38 r✓ r/ .461 3. 1041 41 2 31V 4 5 6 7 8 9 O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 0 3 4 5 v✓ O' 1 n FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST v V PAGE 0012 TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 a fl PAY VENDOR NAME VND tt ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ St ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL *************•x•**•»*•its►**********************at***•x**•n#*****•M'**#**•n****•u' $3. 167.89 IC 11 12 1A i`_ R MONSOON LAGOON WATER SLIDE 02953 001-400-4601-4308 00881 $582.50 010 07008 44777 SUMMER TRIP/COMM RES 010 07/20/93 COMM_RESOURCES /PRQGRAM MATERIALS $0 QQ_08L05L9 13 14 15 '6 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $582.50 17 19 70 7 1 '7 R TOM*MURPHY 05258 110-300-0000-3302 52953 $20.00 4800613 06912 44778 CITE PAYMENT REFUND 00613 06/30/93 /COURT FINESLEARAING $000_ 08/05/- _ *** VENDOR TOTAL•*********************************************************•*********** $20.00 25 27 29 • L3 74 R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY 00091 001-400-1212-4188 02781 $153.00 00013 44779 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 EMP BENEF 1 LEMPLOYEE BENEEITS $Q—Q0—QBL0519 z9 31 32 27 .. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $153.00 33 35 3' ^ 13 R NATIONAL HOME LIFE 03465 001-400-1212-4188 02782 $80.00 00065 44780 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/33 EMP__I3ENEFISS /EMPLOYEE BENEELIS $Q-00-0BL05 - 37 30 30 4• 11 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $80.00 41 4:: 43 44 R NATOA/NLC 03384 001-400-1205-4315 00050 $275.00 07061 44781 AGENCY DUES/FY 93-94 08/02/93 CABLE TV /MEMBERSHIP $Q 00 OSLO - 45 A6, 47 46 49 51 :7 53 ss1 56 57 50, so CO 37 .0 19 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $275.00 41. J1 A2 R ALIZA*NIKAYIN 05104 001-300-0000-3893 02587 $85.00 64264 06694 44782 SUMMER CLASS REFUND 64264 06/30/93 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 08L0 .1? 14 45 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $85.00 , 46 A7 40 R PAGENET 02487 001-400-1201-4201 00181 $11.00 31106 00049 44783 PAGING SERV/AUG 93 . 31106 08/01/93 CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 08L05/93 61 6: , 63 66 A9 6p 51 R PAGENET 02487 001-400-1203-4201 01065 $11.00 00049 44783 PAGING SERV/AUG 93 08/01/93 PERSONNEL /CONTRACjSERVICE/PRIVA_T $0..00._._Q8L05L92_66 65 66 , 67 Co 70 71 72 52 53 54 5 f,. 73 74 1 75 29 i1 a�J .4. 1 (' FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST ' PAGE 0013 TIME 13:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 1 2 3� PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP : 7 6 R PAGENET 02487 001-400-2101-4201 01326 $199.00 00049 44783 PAGING SERV/AUG 93 88/01/93 POLICE /CONTRACT SERLICELPRIVAT $0..00-08/05/93 9 1t) n 12 1) i2 R PAGENET 02467 001-400-2401-4201 00394 $11.00 00049 44783 PAGING SERV/AUG 93 08/01/93 ANIMAL_CONT_ROL�CONTRACL-SERSLICELERZVAL $0. 00__08/05L.91 13 14 15 16 13 ° 15 _�_. _ .-. R PAGENET 02487 001-400-4202-4201 00417 $110.00 00049 44763 PAGING SERV/AUG 93 08/01/93 PUB WKS_ADMIN /CONIRACI_SERVICELERIVAT_60.00__.__.08/05/93 I, In I9 20 10 1B R PAGENET 02487 001-400-4601-4201 01851 $22.00 00049 44783 PAGING SERV/AUG 93 08/01/93 COMM_RESOURCES /CONTBACLSERVICE/_PRIVAT. $0 21 22 23 24 19. 21 --'--- 00__.08/O5/9'1 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************itis*******•t►itttirn******it•nitititatat****i►itif*ititatit#atitat•»itati►a►it*** $364.00 25 7,5 27 29 22 , 3 R POSTAGE ON CALL 04091 001-400-1208-4305 01240 $2,008.00 51697214 08084 44784 RESET POSTAGE METER 97214 08/01/93 GEN_APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUEPLIES $0 00_08L05/91 29 30 31 32 " , *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,008.00 33 34 35 36 )-R 0 LAURA*ROZZI 04623 001-400-4601-4221 00267 $415.80 07057 44785 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/26/93 COMM_RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC_CLASSLERGR $0_04_08/05/91 37 3^ 39 40 ; 1 32 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $415.80 41 42' 44 4 35 35 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 001-400-1212-4186 02777 $775.95 00019 44786 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 EMP BENEFITS ' /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $000 08/05/93 45 471 46 37 37 R SAFEGUARD ,HEALTH PLANS 04398 105-400-2601-4188 01477 $63.78 00019 44786 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 STREET_ LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE_BENEF�.TS 49 50 s1• 40 4' A2 $0 00_08/05/.93_ ,z 53 54 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 110-400-1204-4188 00095 $20.94 00019 44786 55 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0_00 Q05L93 56 SL 43 A4 45 57 50 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 110-400-3302-4188 01755 $142.06 00019 44786 53• CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 PARKING ENF/EMPLOyEE_BENEFITS $0 60 46 47 4B 0� 08/05/.93_ 61 62 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 160-400-3102-4188 01459 $37.07 00019 44786 63• CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0 QQQS/05Ls3E4 49 50 51 65 CC R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS .04398 170-400-2103-4188 00446 $21.70 00019 44786 62• CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 SPEC__INVES_GINS /EMPI.QYEEJENEFITS 60 52 52 54 $0 00 08/05/93 4'J 71 70 72 55 56 59 73 74 754 -` as 1J v .r, y' 1.2 43 41 42 43 44 43 4 4 43 -.c 5t 5 54 I55 FINANCE–SFA340 TIME PAY 15:02:01 DEMAND LIST FOR 08/05/93 PAGE 0014 DATE 08/05/93 PO # CHK # UNENC DATE EXP VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** #1,061.50 R LESLIE*SHEA 05260 001-300-0000-3894 00490 $72.00 60744/RD200 07055 44787 SUMMERCLASS_REEIJNn RD200 06/30/93 /OTHER RE(RFATrON_PROGRMG $0 00 D8/05/93--- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $72.00 R SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-4202-4305 00780 $27.06 10085 06562 44788 BUS—CARDSLA,_AMIRANI 10085 OZLQ2L43 PUB WKS_ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SURE IFS $0 00-08/05/-93— *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $27.06 R SIR SPEEDY 00361 110-400-3302-4305 01002 $75.78 17422 06208 44789 DISMISSAL._EQ31CABDS 12422 07/22/93 PARKING ENF /fFFICF OPFR SUPPE IFS $0._-00-08/05/_93— *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************4r**************************** $75.78 R SO. COUNTIES TRAINING ASSOC. 05255 001-400-2101-4313 00440 $79.00 05963 44790 REGISTRATION/J. CARVSQ 08/02/33 POLICE /TRAVEL FXPFNRE. STC $0_00-08/05193 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $79.00 R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-202-0000-2021 00458 $19.42 06843 44791 DISCOUNT OFFERED 06/30/93 DISCOUNTS OFFERFn $0_00.-08105/93 R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-202-0000-2021 00461 $229.95 06843 44791 DISCOUNT OFFERED 07/22//3 DLSCIIUNIS_OEEERED $0_00_08/05/-3 R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-202-0000-2022 00456 $19.42CR 06843 44791 DISCOUNT TAKEN Q6 301 3 [D ISCOUNTS TAKFN $0_00-08/05/93 ' R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-202-0000-2022 00459 $229.95CR 06843 44791 DISCOUNT TAKEN 07/22/93 /DISCOUNIS_IAKEN $0 00_08/05L93__t R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 01324 $36.08 06843 44791 BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTS/JUN, • 06/30/93 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0_00_08/05/93 R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 01327 $427.05 06843 44791 PRISONER EMERG SERV/JUL Q7/22/93 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICELFRIVAT $0 00_08/05/93— 1 2 3 4 6 7 e 9 13 14 0 24 25 3 34 35 37 4 4t 42 4� 44 S 5 6 7 0 4 5 0 2 3 4 5 4 ' M L 1 r Ur rlC WJU.'7M M=M .M 3 FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0015 TIME 15:02:01FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 I, 2 3 " PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT • INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 4 5 ° 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************** ******#*** ************** $463.13 9 10 1" RSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00698 $165.95 CITY GAS BILLS/JUL 93 01067 07/31/93 BLDG MAINT 2 13 15 16 /UTILITIES $Q QQ—D8L05LD5L41 16 5 15 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $165. 95 17 16 18 7 8 RSUNSET RANCH HOLLYWOOD STABLES 04632 001-400-4601-4201 01853 $1.050.002 06696 44793 TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 08/01/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT 70 21 23 SERVICE/PRIVAT o *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.050.00 ,, 25 26 27 `' R SUSAN*TAINTER05261 . 001-300-0000-3894 00489 $52.00 63437/RD200 07056 44794 SUMMER CLASS REFUND RD200 06/30/93 26 29 30 IL /OTHER RECREATTQN PROGRMS $Q-00_08LD5L93 ,.., *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $52.00 27 32 33 334 5 23 • ' R TOM*THOMPSON01009 001-400-2101-4312 02140 $40.00 05961 44795 MEALS/P. 0. S. T. CLASS Q8/0 /.43 EOLI.CE 36 37 330 9' 31 /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST $0 00 QR/05/9: *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40. 00 11 40 41 42 43 14 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-202-0000-2021 00460 $1.93 01073 44796 '' DISCOUNT OFFERED 07/31/93 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 44 45 „1 .l $0.00 08/05/93 30 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-202-0000-2022 00458 $1.93CR 01073 44796 J3 DISCOUNT TAKEN 07/31/93 4° 49 50 4�, /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0 00 08/05/93 57 Al R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 160-400-3102-4309 00820 $94.74 01073 44796 42 MISC PLUMBING SUPP/JUL93 07/31/93 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE 53 554 s. 4.1 MATERIALS $0.00 08/05/93 44 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $94.74 43 56 57 5° 43 07 R TOTAL/SCQAMD 04106 001-400-1203-4316 00239 $125.00 07109 44797 48 AGMD TRAINING/BLACKWOOD ' 08/02/93 PERSONNEL /TRAINING co 61 662 3 '. 49 ` $0 00_08/05/93 64 65 50 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $125.00 91 �6 07 .._ G,1 69 53 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 001-400-1212-4188 02776 $250.39 00029 44798 714 sa CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 EMP_[3EN.F T$. /EMPLOYEE 55 BE.NEFIJS *0 00 0$L05/93 72 50 73 74 t7 /5 7Y 16.2 41, .41 W v .r CITY OF.HERMOSA_B „A '5) J FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0016 '; 2 TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 3 '• PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 7 6 IJ R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL - 00240 105-400-2601-4188 01476 $1.18 00029 44798 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 STREET LIGHTING /EMP_LOYEE_BENEFITS 9 19 11 12 $0 00..__08/05/93 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 109-400-3301-4188 00418 $1.18 00029 44798 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93_- BENEELIS 13 14 15 13 _.-.._...___._..___._VEH._.PKG_D.ISI_LEMP .OYEE $0..00_._08!05/_93-1e R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 110-400-1204-4188 00094 $1.76 00029 44798 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 Q8/02/93____..___..._._.______FINANCE_CASH IER_LEMEL0YEE_BENEEI.TS 17 IS 19 $0_-00-08/.05/93.-20 1: 17 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 160-400-3102-4188 01458 $1.76 00029 44798 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 SEWER/ST_DRAIN /EMP..J_DYEE_BENEELTS $0.00__-08/05/93 21 22 23 2' .:.1; ' R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00745 $5.82 00029 44798 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/02/93 LIABILITY INS.__LEMPI.Q_YEE_BENEEITS 2 76 27 28 $0 00____08/05/.93._ • R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00832 $5.82 00029 44798 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93" 08/02/93 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE_BENEFITS 29 39 31 32 $0 00_08L05L93. 45 *** VENDOR TOTAL#############*##****#****###****#*****##***####*###*#######*#**###** $267.91 77 33 34 35 36 :!] 23 R TRANSPORTATION CHARTER SERV. 05018 145-400-3409-4201 00072 $23.50 10113 07062 44799 ADD'L BUS CHCS/COMM RES 10113 07/26/93 REC TRANSP1N /C.QNIRACT SERVISEIPRIVAT $0 37 38 39' 49 11 00_O8LQ5L93 '= *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $23.50 3) 41 43' 44 71 R GREG OR BETTE*TUCKER 05262 001-300-0000-3890 00041 $104.00 56421 03923 44800 35 REFUND NOTICING FEE 56421 07/21/93 ;_•Ls - $0 45 46 47' 48 37 -•• _00____Q8L45193 33 R GREG OR DETTE*TUCKER 05262 001-400-1121-4323 00243 $95.00 03923 44800 30 REFUND APPEAL FEES 07/21/93 CITY CLERK /PU$LIC NOTICLNQ- 49 50 51' $Q 00 08/05493 40 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL##############*******#*####*#*#######*#*#***#*###*#*#***#****#**#*** $199.00 42 52 53 5554' 56 43 ^' UNION METAL CORPORATION 00403 105-400-8201-5499 00026 $1,562.66 302816 06521 44801 ^5 ST LITE CONVERSION PARTS 02816 07/21/93 LT CONY/INSTALL /NON-f,.API_TALI.,ZED ASSETS $0 00_ 08/-05/_91 57 56 59' 60 16 TOTAL###*#*##**#*##**###***###**###***####**#####**###*####***##*###*### $1.562.66 4047 **# VENDOR # 61 62 63'. 64 41 5o R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 001-400-1212-4188 02785 $1,902.57 00022 44802 S1 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 Q8/02/93 EMP_BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 65 66 67` $0 00 08/D5/93_!n 52G9 53 54 70 71• 72 55 56 7 73 74 70 „A '5) J 41. • FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0017 zl TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 3 3 4 5 PAY VENDOR NAME VND It ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO It CHK * 6 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 7 6 8 0 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 105-400-2601-4188 01481 $128.96 00022 44802 10 11 '—_ CITY_.HEALTH_INS/AUG 93 08/02/93_____..___.__.—.___.__STREET__LIGHTING_IEMPLQYEE_BENEF/TS $0.00--08/05/93 13 14 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 109-400-3301-4188 00422 $4.19 00022 44802 15 '2 CITILHEALTEL_INSLAUG 93 08/02L33 VEH_.,P_KG_DIST /FMELOYEE RENEFTTS $0 00-08/05/9'1 6 '4 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 110-400-1204-4188 00100 • $117.81 00022 44802 1s 15 CITY_HEALT1L1NSLAUD_33 08/02/93 FINANCE_CASHIFR /FMP_LCYFF BENEFLTS $0.-00.--08/05/93 70 1> 21 17 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 110-400-3302-4188 01759 $207.65 00022 44802 22 23 10 CITY_iIEALTH INSLAUG 93 08L02L33 PARKING_ENF /EMpl ❑YFF AENFFTTR $0_.00-08/05l-93— 24 25 zs r; 26 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 160-400-3102-4188 01463 $73.47 00022 44802 27 2 CITY HEALTH 08/02/93—..._..___._..._...____....._SEWER/ST_DRAIN___LEMP_LDYFF BENEF_LTS $0.00—_08/05/93__.2. ._ _INSLAUG__93 30 •1 z4 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CUL...HEALTH INSLAUQ 3 03790 08102L23 705-400-1209-4188 00748 $18.75 LIABILITY TNS /FMPIrIYFF RENFFTTS 00022 44802 $0 00-08/05/93 31 32 33 34 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. 03790 705-400-1217-4188 00836 $24.42 00022 44802 3s 27 CITY HEALTH INS/AUG 93 08/92193 WORKERS_CUMP /FMPLt7YFF RENEFITS $0-00---08/05/93---2.n 28 37 29 38 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************•*****•****•****************************** $2.477.82 39 30 40 31 41 37 42 R V & V MANUFACTURING 01938 001-400-2101-4187 00549 $147.33 1612 06808 44803 43 3J BADGES/POLICE 1612 07/15/93 P_OLICE /UNIEORM ALLOWANCF $0 0008/05/.93 44 34 -------- _ —45 • 35 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****•********************•*********•********************************** $147.33 47' 30 48 :17 49 38 R WEST COAST NETTING 05257 001-400-4601-4308 00882 $723.54 33045 06684 44804 50 51' 3^ BEACH VOLLEYBALL NETS 33045 07/09/93 COMM..RESOURCES—LPRUGRACLMA_TERIALS $0 00-08/_05/93.—s2 4;1 53 41. *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $723.54 35 • 42 56 43 57 44 58 R WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE 01152 001-400-1203-4201 01064 $272.00 25610 07103 44805 53' 45 CITY MANAGER AD 25610 07/01/93 PERSONNEL /CON_TRACI_SFRVICELP_RLVAT $0 00 08/05/93 60 46 81 62 47 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $272.00 63' 48 64 49 65 50 R WHITMORE, JOHNSON & BOLANOS 05129 001-400-1203-4201 01062 $757.55 07104 44806 86 67' 51 LEGAL SERV/JUNE 93 .Q6/30193 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0 00_08L00L93_68 52 69 53 70 54 71 72 55 - 73 56 74 7 75 ' 41. • Q J J W V J J U LTX . Uh_ _HtHPIUSA_JItf4D 2 3 1 9 FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0018 TIME 15:02:01 FOR 08/05/93 DATE 08/05/93 6 7 e 9 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ St ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP '1I II.1 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************•»•n******•>t*******It************•It**•»*•»*************n**** $757.55 0 11 12 3 R BRIAN*WISELY 05263 001-400-4601-4221 00266 3322.00 07049 44807 REC CLASSLERGR_ $0 00-08105/_9' 14 15 18 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/26/93 COMMRESOURCES/CONTRACT 17 18 19 20 21 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $322.00 .. 17 I- 2.28 E' : R MARY ANNE RURAK*WRIGHT 05264 001-300-0000-3893 02586 $40.00 60678 07011 44808 $0 00 08/.05L93 22 23 2a SUMMER CLASS REFUND 60678 06/30/93 /CONIR.REC.REATION_LASSES 25 26 27 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40. 00 29 3, 31 92 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-4201 01027 $584.48 0382238966. 00020 44809 GEN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRI AT $0_90 018/_05/_93 METER USE/MAINT—APR—JUNE 38966 06/30/93 AEPEPP- 33 34 35 36, .7 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-4201 01028 $352.80 038238965 00007 44809 SERVICEIPRIVAT $0 00 08/05/93 METER USE/MAINT/JUNE 93 38965 06/30/93 GEN_.APPROP /CONTRACT 37 3a 39 40 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $937.28 JI42 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $122.554.84 43 44 45 1 3.t 3 37 *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $122.554.84 46 47 48 49 37 JO 50 51 !2 aC al 4 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR mAiroks COVERED BY i THE 51 54 55 6 THEWARRANTS LISTED -ON -PAGES 0 -INCLUSIVE.OF 57 50 �o 41 ,1 45 FOR �S/�3 ARE ACCURATE, WARRANT REGISTER FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE 61 62 63 64 65 66 6 7 69 69 TO THEBUDGET. 45 47 BY 40 FINAN E !RECTOR 1 40 50 51 DATE s'/9 ., .... 52 57 54 70 7 1 72 73 55 74 75 79 J J W V J J Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council August 24, 1993 August 3, 1993 City Council Meeting of August 10, 1993 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGEND& ITEXIB Possible amendment to Beach Drive encroachment ordinance Fire Flow Prioritization of CIP projects Public Hearing Appeal of Planning Commission decision to approve an amended conditional use permit for 2701 PCH, Round Table Pizza September 14, 1993 Lease renewal for Association for Retarded Citizens Report on changing police schedule to a five day work week Lease renewal for Easter Seal Society Lease renewal for South Bay Center for Counseling September 28, 1993 Approval of litigation defense firm list Minimum job expectations for civil service employees October 12, 1993 RFB irrigation South School/ Biltmore Site 3rd Quarter General Plan Amendments: 1st St. & 1st Place closure Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director Community Resources Dir. Personnel/Police Chief Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Council Subcommittee/ Risk Manager Personnel Director Public Works Director Planning Director lc 3rd Quarter General Plan Amendments: Air Quality Element 3rd Quarter General Plan Amendments: Land Use Element December , 1993 Lease renewal for Project Touch (Room C) Community Resources Dir. January, 1994 Joint meeting: Chamber/Council ***************************************************************** Planning Director Planning Director UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED Initiated by Party Staff Caltrans utility maintenance agreement Public Works Dir. Staff Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Council Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Council Revision of HBMC provisions per- taining to construction of public street improvements (Public Hrg) Staff Staff Request for approval of Tenant/ Users Liability Insurance Program (TULIP) and establishment of an administrative fee for processing TULIP applications Public Works Dir. Planning Director Public Works Dir. Personnel Director Payroll software selection Finance Director Staff Special study re. standards for small lots Planning Director Special study of the zoning ordi- nance and enforcement ordinance re. parking in front yard setback Planning Director Council Amendment to Ord. 93-1084 allowing vehicle parking on public street r -o -w along walkstreets on west side of Beach Drive Public Works Director Staff Review of commercial beach events policy, with Ordinance Comm. Resources Dir. ,14 Staff County Safe Neighborhood Park Act (Grant -Prop A) application for municipal pier renovation Comm. Resources Dir. VPD RFB parking demand study To be assigned Chamber Farmer's Market: move to Pier Avenue Chamber of Commerce Staff Fire Flow study Fire Chief/Public Works A:FUTURE August 4, 1993 Honorable Mayor City Council Meeting and Members of the of August 10, 1993 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMISA BEACH Attached is report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of July 1993. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, `r7 . Workman i- Treasurer NOTED: Mary01!!PP Inte mCity Manager ld INVESTMENT REPORT - JULY 1993 DATE OF DATE OF ASKING MARKET INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT MATURITY PRICE VALUE INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 6/1/93 $8,740,000.00 Maturity (250,000.00) BALANCE 6/30/93 58,490,000.00 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 6/1/93 51,745,210.55 BALANCE 6/30/93 U.S. TREASURY BOND Investment Investment Investment INVESTMENT TOTAL SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST 7/08/93 4.61% 51,745,210.55 3.85% $1,005,937.50 09/14/90 06/30/94 $1,005,937.50 $1,044,060.00 8.50% $989,687.50 12/03/92 11/30/97 $ 989,687.50 $1,038,440.00 6.24% 1,008,437.50 02/18/93 01/31/98 $1,008,437.50 $1,022,810.00 5.625% 513,239,273.05 BALANCE 6/01/93 $521,777.80 Adjustment 39.97 6/30/93 BALANCE 6/30/91 CHICAGO TITLE 5521,817.77 8.40% BALANCE 1/02/93 $12,084.52 Adjustment $148.31 6/30/93 BALANCE 6/30/93 $12,232.83 2.594% TRUSTEE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL Respectfully Submitted, $534,050.60 $13,773,321.65 • • August 2, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of August 10, 1993 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT (JTPA) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the attached Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement 83-100. Background: In 1983 the cities of Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, Lawndale and Inglewood entered into a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) to form a consortium known as the South Bay Service Delivery Area (SBSDA). The purpose of the SBSDA is to provide employment and training services under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and Family - Economic Security Act (FESA). The City of Inglewood serves as the administrative entity for the JPA and is responsible for the general administration and supervision of all funds received under the JTPA. Redondo Beach serves as the "operating city" for the cities of Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, and El Segundo and as such provides the direct service to eligible Hermosa Beach residents. In September 1992 the Job Training Reform Amendment was executed by the President with an effective date of July 1993. Included in the reform legislation was an allowance to increase the allowable administrative expenditures from 15% to 20%. This increase recognized a significant increase in administrative requirements. Under the current Joint Powers Agreement, of the 15% administrative expenditure, Inglewood is authorized to charge an an amount not to exceed 6% of the formula funded JTPA funds with the operating cities authorized the remaining 9%. In order for both the operating cities and Inglewood as administrative entity to proportionately benefit from the federal governments allowance ofanadditional 5%, Inglewood has proposed that the increase be split in the same proportion as the current split (40/60). This would allow Inglewood to increase their administrative charges from 6% to 8% and the operating cities from 9% to 12%. r Analysis/Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact to the City of Hermosa Beach as no direct funding for administrative services is allocated. Redondo Beach, as an operating city, has concurred with the administrative entities proposal which will be effective July 1, 1994 Respectfully submitted: ;64_49-azi,010 Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: M. Rooney Interim City Manager w 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT NO. 83-100 THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into this day of 1993, by and between the Cities of El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale, Manhattan Beach, and Redondo Beach, all of which are organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California: The cities are collectively referred to as "Cities" and in certain contexts are referred to as "Participating Cities". WHEREAS, on July 5, 1983, the Cities entered into Agreement No. 83- 100 in order to form a consortium within the boundaries of all Participating Cities known as the South Bay Service Delivery Area for the delivery of employment and training services under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and the Family Economic Security Act (FESA); and, WHEREAS, on September 7, 1992, the Job Training Reform Amendment was signed into law by the President which, in order to address the increase in program management requirements allows for an increase in the allowable administrative cost rate; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with SECTION 8, of Agreement 83-100, the City of Inglewood is responsible for the general administration and supervision of all funds received under the JTPA by all Cities and is permitted to charge the Cities an administrative fee not to exceed 6% of the funds to which all Cities are entitled under the JTPA and FESA; and, WHEREAS, the parties mutually agree that the administrative fee which the City of Inglewood is permitted to charge should be increased to 8%; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises the parties hereto have agreed as follows: 1. SECTION 8 of Agreement No. 83-100, is hereby amended to allow the City of Inglewood to charge Participating Cities an administrative fee not // 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 li to exceed 8% for the formula funds where the maximum allowable administrative fee is 20% and to which all Participating Cities are entitled under the JTPA and FESA. 2. This amendment shall be effective when all parties have executed same; provided, however, that upon such approval the increase in the administrative fee set forth above shall become effective on July 1, 1994. 3. Except as otherwise specifically amended herein, all terms and conditions contained in Agreement No. 83-100 shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the date and year above written. ATTEST: City Clerk ATTEST: City Clerk ATTEST: City Clerk ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BY Mayor CITY OF GARDENA BY Mayor CITY OF HAWTHORNE BY Mayor CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY Mayor 1 CITY OF INGLEWOOD 2 3 4 .. 5 6. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ATTEST: City Clerk ATTEST: City Clerk ATTEST: City Clerk ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney (SEAL) BY Mayor CITY OF LAWNDALE BY Mayor CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH BY Mayor CITY OF REDONDO BEACH BY Mayor August 3, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council August 10, 1993 SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH FOR THE JOINT OPERATION OF THE WAVE SERVICE LOCATION:HERMOSA BEACH AND REDONDO BEACH INITIATED BY PLANNING STAFF PURPOSE: TO APPROVE EXTENDING THE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH FOR THE JOINT OPERATION OF THE WAVE SERVICE Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Mayor and city Council approve an agreement with the City of Redondo beach for the joint operation of the WAVE service. Background: Since October 7, 1986, the cities of Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach have jointly funded the WAVE dial -a -ride service. Under contract with the City, DAVE Transportation Services, Inc. (formaly Community Transit Services), has operated the WAVE since February 1, 1987. The City's Agreement with Redondo Beach has expired and this Agreement will extend the joint operation until June 30, 1998. Analysis: The purpose of the Agreement is to assist in clarifying the roles, responsibilities, and financial participation between Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach. The Agreement specifies that Redondo Beach contract for, administer, and oversee the day-to-day WAVE dial -a -ride operation. The • Agreement also specifies that Redondo Beach: 1.) Provide a Program Manager to administer, monitor and evaluate service on the WAVE system; 2.) . Prepare and submit an annual application with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for funds from the Proposition A Subregional Incentive Program; 3.) Provide Hermosa Beach with a complete report of trips originating in Hermosa Beach; and 4.) Invoice Hermosa Beach on a quarterly basis. The City of Hermosa Beach shall: 1.) Designate a staff person to be the Hermosa Beach Transit Coordinator who shall review all aspects of the WAVE; and 2. Annually adopt a resolution supporting Redondo Beach's application for funds' from the Los Angeles County Transportation Authority's Proposition A Subregional Incentive Program. 1f Both cities shall: 1.) Identify, register, and sell tickets to their eligible elderly and disabled residents; 2.) Distribute marketing and promotional materials; and 3.) Submit all required Proposition A/C project descriptions to the Los Angeles County Transportation Authority. Each City's proportionate share of the cost shall be based upon each City's population divided by the combined total population of both cities. In the event the two cities do not receive transportation subsidies from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority this agreement can be terminated upon a 60 day written notice. It should be noted that the past contract with DAVE Transportation Services has recently been discontinued and underbid by Medi -Ride, a division of Laidlaw Transit, Inc. Medi -Ride will be providing the exact same service for $27,000 less (over three years), all vehicles will be 100% wheelchair accessible, and will employ more full time employees. Michael Schubach Attachments: 1. Proposed Joint Agreement (Two Copies). Lindsay VHIr sh Planning Aide AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 27th day of July ,1993, by and between the City of Redondo Beach, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as REDONDO BEACH and the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation, herein after referred to as HERMOSA BEACH. W ITNESSETH RECITALS: 1. REDONDO BEACH and HERMOSA BEACH have operated the Redondo and Hermosa Beach Dial -A -Ride system (hereinafter referred to as WAVE SYSTEM) since February 1987; and 2. HERMOSA BEACH desires to provide its proportionate share of the net cost based on the relative population of the City; and 3. REDONDO BEACH desires to contract for, administer and oversee the WAVE SYSTEM and provide its proportionate share of the net cost based on the relative population of the City; and 4. REDONDO. BEACH and HERMOSA BEACH acknowledge that the continuous operation of the WAVE SYSTEM is. conting.ent upon the continued receipt by both cities of grants. and allocations from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, REDONDO BEACH and HERMOSA BEACH agree as follows: I PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to 'assist in clarifying the roles, responsibilities, and financial participation between REDONDO BEACH and HERMOSA BEACH. The WAVE SYSTEM was approved by REDONDO BEACH on July 8, 1986, and approved by HERMOSA BEACH on June 24, 1986. Exhibit A defines the service area and satellite points to be served. II TERM The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 1993, to June 30, 1998, inclusive. III ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT ROLES A. The parties agree that the City of REDONDO BEACH shall perform and/or administer the WAVE SYSTEM as follows: 1. Provide a Program Manager to administer, monitor, and evaluate service on the WAVE SYSTEM. 2. Contract with a service provider for the operation of the WAVE SYSTEM (the "Service Contract"). 3. Have full authority to monitor- and enforce all provisions of the WAVE SYSTEM Service Contract. 4. Sell.ti.ckets and issue vouchers. REDONDO BEACH shall also identify and verify all -eligible elderly and. handicapped. REDONDO BEACH residents. 5. REDONDO BEACH's Project Manager shall meet monthly with designated representatives from HERMOSA BEACH to review the status and quality of service provided, invoices received from the service contractor, and all expenses incurred in the administration, operations, monitoring, and evaluation of the WAVE SYSTEM. 2 6. Annually prepare and submit an application for funds from the Proposition A Subregional Incentive Program. 7. Submit to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority the necessary Proposition A project descriptions as required. 8. Distribute WAVE SYSTEM marketing materials to its residents. 9. Provide and use the uniform tickets, the elderly and the handicapped registration forms, brochures and information cards specifically designed for the WAVE SYSTEM. 10. Design and produce or cause the production of marketing materials, i.e., tickets, registration forms, brochures and information cards for the WAVE SYSTEM. 11. Submit quarterly reports to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority as required under the Subregional Incentive Program. 12. Have full authority to make necessary service changes to,the WAVE SYSTEM that do not result'in an 'increase in service cost. REDONDO BEACH shall consult with HERMOSA BEACH prior to implementing service changes and adjustments. 13.. Provide HERMOSA BEACH with a complete report of trips originating in HERMOSA BEACH. The form and detail of the monthly report shall be mutually agreed upon by REDONDO BEACH and HERMOSA BEACH consistent with Service Contract reporting systems. B. The parties agree that the City of HERMOSA BEACH shall perform and/or administer as follows: 3 1. Designate a staff person to be the HERMOSA BEACH Transit Coordinator. The Transit Coordinator shall assist REDONDO BEACH in reviewing all aspects of the WAVE SYSTEM. 2. Sell tickets and issue vouchers. HERMOSA BEACH will -also identify and verify all eligible elderly and handicapped HERMOSA BEACH residents. 3. HERMOSA BEACH's Transit Coordinator shall meet monthly with REDONDO BEACH to review the monthly information provided by the REDONDO BEACH Project Manager. 4. Submit to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority the necessary Proposition A project descriptions as required. 5. Annually adopt a resolution supporting REDONDO BEACH's application for funds from the Proposition A Subregional Incentive Program. 6. Distribute the WAVE SYSTEM marketing materials to its residents. 7. Provide and use the uniform tickets, the elderly and the handicapped.re.gistration forms, brochures and information cards specifically designed for the WAVE SYSTEM. 8. Attend WAVE SYSTEM management meetings with Contractor at sole discretion of HERMOSA BEACH. IV CALCULATING PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF PROGRAM COST The parties agree that each City's proportionate share of the WAVE SYSTEM cost shall be based upon population as identified by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The formula for determining the proportionate share based on 4 population is the population of the respective city divided by the combined total population of both cities. The parties further agree that for purposes of this agreement the Fiscal Year 93-94 population for REDONDO BEACH is 61,100; and HERMOSA BEACH is 18,400. V PAYMENT FOR SERVICES REDONDO BEACH shall invoice HERMOSA BEACH for all sums due under this Agreement. Such invoice shall contain the following information: 1. Service Contract costs; 2. REDONDO BEACH's administrative costs; . 3. dispatch center office lease; 4. marketing costs; 5. other direct applicable costs; 6. farebox recovery; 7. •the Subregional Incentive grant amount; and 8. proportionate share of cost due for both cities.. HERMOSA BEACH.shall pay within thirty (30) days of receipt of said invoice. The City of HERMOSA BEACH and the.City.of REDONDO BEACH shall each pay a proportionate share of costs for: 1. service provider; 2. REDONDO BEACH's administrative costs; 3. dispatch office lease; and 4. marketing; which includes design and production of marketing materials. 5 Subregional Incentive grant funds and farebox revenues received by REDONDO BEACH shall be credited to the total system costs prior to calculating the proportionate costs for each City. VI INDEMNIFICATION A. REDONDO BEACH agrees to indemnify and hold HERMOSA BEACH harmless from and against all claims, liabilities, losses, damages, actions, and expenses (including attorney's fees) as a result of bodily injury to, or death of any person to, or loss of use of property incident to, or arising from actions of REDONDO BEACH under the terms of this Agreement B. HERMOSA BEACH agrees to indemnify and hold REDONDO BEACH harmless from and against all claims, liabilities, losses, damages, actions, and expenses (including attorney's fees) as a result of bodily injury to, or death of any person to, or loss of use of property incident to, or arising from actions of HERMOSA BEACH under the terms of this Agreement. VII NOTICES_ A. Written notices to REDONDO BEACH.. shall be given by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to: WILLIAM KIRCHHOFF, CITY MANAGER CITY OF REDONDO BEACH 415 DIAMOND STREET REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277 with duplicate notice to Brad Lindahl, Transit Manager. 6 B. Written notices to HERMOSA BEACH shall be given by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to: MARY ROONEY, INTERIM CITY MANAGER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 with duplicate notice to Michael Schubach, Planning Director. VIII AUDIT HERMOSA BEACH shall have the right to review, audit, and inspect the books, records, invoices, and other written documentation related to the WAVE SYSTEM during normal business hours at REDONDO BEACH. IX CONTRACT TERMINATION FOR FAILURE OF CONTINGENCY In the event the two cities do not receive transportation subsidies from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority this Agreement can be terminated upon a 60 day written notice. X ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENTS This Agreement may be amendedupon the .approval in writing of both parties and executed by theappropriate authorities of each party hereto. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein and incidental hereto and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements. 7 EXHIBIT A WAVE SERVICE AREA The WAVE serves the cities of Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach with a combined population of 79,500 residents and an area of 7.5 square miles. The satellites points served by the WAVE are: 1. Bay Shores on Del Amo Boulevard 3565 Del Amo Boulevard Torrance, CA 90503 2. Del Amo Medical Office 21320 Hawthorne Boulevard Torrance, CA 90504 3. El Camino College Cafeteria and/or Auditorium 16007 Crenshaw Boulevard Torrance, CA 90506 4. Kennedy Watts Center 20911 Earle Torrance, CA 90503 5. Little Company of Mary Hospital 4101 Torrance Boulevard 4350 Torrance Boulevard Torrance, CA 90503 6. Lomita Boulevard Medical Offices (up to Torrance Memorial Hospital) 3330 thru 3660 Lomita Boulevard Torrance, CA 90504 7. Manhattan Beach Social Security Office 225. S. Sepulveda Boulevard Manhattan Beach, -CA 90266 8. Skypark Medical Offices 3295 and 3333 Skypark Drive• Torrance, CA 90504 9. South Bay Hospital 514 N. Prospect Avenue Redondo Beach, CA 90277 10. Torrance Medical Offices 3400 and 3440 Lomita Boulevard 23441 thru 23560 Madison Torrance, CA 90504 11. Torrance Memorial Hospital 3330 W. Lomita Boulevard Torrance, CA 90505 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the City of REDONDO BEACH and the City of HERMOSA BEACH hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers and shall be effective as of the date first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY: BY: MAYOR MAYOR CITY OF REDONDO BEACH BY: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: (I( 4( CITY ATT//4 NEY Date Council Adopted: HB/RBWAVECON93-98 8 BY: , -4t_f___ nieiei= CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: jgsf Y AT ORNEY Date Council Adopted: July 27, 1993 August 2, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the City Council August 10, 1993 LEASE RENEWAL BETWEEN THE CITY AND HOPE CHAPEL FOR SPACE IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER (Rooms 5 and 6A) RECOMMENDATION The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff recommend that Council approve the lease agreement between the City and Hope Chapel for Rooms 5 and 6A in the Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached agreement. BACKGROUND Hope Chapel presently leases Rooms 5, 6A and 13 in the Community Center. They have been tenants in the Center since September, 1986. The Community Center rooms are used for storage for activities they hold in the Community Center, a nursery for Sunday services, counseling and youth activities. All of their services are provided free of charge. ANALYSIS The lease space for Rooms 5 and 6A is 924 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $804 ($.87 sq. ft.). The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental policy approved by Council in February, 1993 with all other conditions of the former lease remaining the same. Fiscal Impact: $9,704 Estimated annual revenue Concur: Mar ooney Respectfully subs . ed, Mar ha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Director Acting City Manager Finance Department 1 lg HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 10th day of August , 19 93 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Hope Chapel (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One (1) year commencing on the 1st day of September ,1993 , and ending on the 31st day of August ,19 94 . 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 5 (792 sq. ft.) and Room 6A (132 sq. ft.) of the Community Center. 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: Sept. 1, 1993 thru June 30, 1994 ($.87 sq. ft.) $804 per month. July 1, 1994 thru Aug. 31, 1994: $832 per month ($.90 sq. ft.) Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the 1 remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Hope Chapel related activities And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; 2 (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be canceled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee promises to hold the City harmless from any claims, causes of actions or damages of any nature whatever arising from Lessee's use of the premises and will pay the City any monies to which the City may become obli- gated because of Lessee's use of the premises. Lessee shall, if so instructed by the City, cause any occupants of the premises to execute a document in a form prepared by the City wherein that occupant shall expressly waive any right of ac- tion against the City for damages for any injury sustained because of Lessee's use of the premises. 3 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEAU, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: HOPE CHAPEL 2420 Pacific Coast Hwy. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LE SEE: rz--7,27- /95i :7, se/ Pastor, Hope Chap. 5 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council or,v1 y August 3,1993 8//°A.3 g Regular Meeting of August 10, 1993 DENY REQUEST FOR MULTI -WAY STOP CONTROL 6TH STREET AND CYPRESS AVENUE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council deny a request to install STOP controls on 6th Street at Cypress Avenue. Background: Mr. Russ Lesser of Body Glove Corporation expressed a concern regarding the subject intersection. A recent accident involving a bicyclist at the existing STOP sign prompted his concern that a four way STOP might have prevented the accident. Analysis: Presently the intersection is located at the bottom of a sag vertical curve. Thus, 6th Street traffic in the northbound and southbound directions respectively travel downhill from Valley and Loma, then uphill once they pass the intersection. Sixth Street traffic does not stop at Cypress but both sides of Cypress are stopped. The area is primarily for light industrial uses. At three of the corners either a building or a block wall produce some visual sight restrictions for motorists on the approaches. Curb parking on the south side of Sixth and the east side also contribute to visual obstructions. The reported accident history for the past five years at this location indicates only the bicycle accident that Mr. Lesser stated. Traffic volume levels on Sixth Street taken in 1991, indicate approximately 1010 vehicles per day in a two way direction. Cypress Avenue is a short street to the east that only carries local access. None of the Caltrans recognized traffic volume warrants for a multi -way STOP control are met. Last, when a vehicle stops at Cypress and moves the front of the auto to the prolongation of the curb line of Sixth Street, there is sufficient sight line to see vehicles coming down the hill from Valley or Loma. The only restricted visibility is on the south side of Sixth Street in front of the industrial uses where parking is allowed. We do not believe STOP control will improve the efficiency of operation at this location nor do we believe it will improve what we believe to be safe operation. - 1 - lh Alternatives: 1. Install multi -way STOP. 2. Remove curb parking on south side of sixth street to improve sight lines. Respectji ly submitted, Concur: Edward J. Ruza City Traffic Ei inee ty/er6th milt((lc-lk--, Amy AmaL'Jrani Director of Public Works Mary Act' y g City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members 08/03/93 City Council Meeting of August 10, 1993 PROGRESS REPORT ON INSTALLATION OF MICRO -SYSTEM BASED LAN It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. Background: The purchase of Software/Hardware to begin a Local Area Network Pilot program was authorized on February 25, 1992 at the Mid -year budget review. Since that time a 20 User Novell 3.11 Network has been installed and operated on 8 installed connections for evaluation of tasks including Word Processing, Spreadsheet Applications, and some Accounting functions. Network Administration is in effect to allow rapid transition of all applications, currently running on the existing HP3000 platform, to the Novell platform. The LAN system is currently being expanded to allow the entire City of Hermosa Beach user base to access the Novell System. The wiring for 45 computer connections is scheduled to take place Friday 08/13, Saturday 08/14, and Sunday 08/15. Analysis: Implementation of the Novell 3.11 Platform to replace the existing Mini -Computer based System requires a three phase operation. The phases, and some of the components of each, are as follows: PHASE 1: LAN/SYSTEMS Installation of LAN SYSTEM. The City of Hermosa Beach LAN will be an EtherNet Star configuration Network Backbone. Connectivity will be established using the latest technology in speed and efficiency. The LAN System will be fully supported in-house and will not require outside contractors or any additional expense to maintain or operate. The LAN Software is an IPX (InterNet Packet Exchange) protocol supplied by NOVELL. The WorkStation System platform chosen is the 486 DX33 VESA platform. This System was chosen based on speed, dependability, and a proven track record. The Operating System Environment bundled with these systems includes the DOS 6.0, and Windows 3.1 Graphical User Interface. Installation, Maintenance, future upgrade and repair will be done on-site. Manufacturers warranties will apply to all hardware components but no additional expense will be incurred by contracting outside technicians or support staff. 1i PHASE 2: SOFTWARE/APPLICATION SELECTION All Department heads are now being interviewed to determine requirements for software applications. Specific applications for finance, accounting, citations, etc. are being reviewed based on the input of the current vendors for• the HP3000 and the requirements of the Departments. The completion of this phase will be the installation, setup and operation of the selected packages that will totally replace the HP3000. Support for the packages selected will be entirely in-house. No support contracts will be required to operate and maintain the System. The Software Support for the HP3000 is not being renewed. Basic packages for word processing, spreadsheets, and some other utilities have been chosen. PHASE 3: CONVERSION & REPLACEMENT OF THE HP3000 The technique being recommended for the conversion is "COLD TURKEY". This type of conversion dictates a total and immediate replacement of the existing system with no micro -code program conversion or database conversion. The HP3000 terminals would be reduced to a small number required for reference by the Finance Department. The new databases chosen would start out fresh and could be built with existing data required and future input (this eliminates the substantial expense incurred by requiring program encoding of old databases. A Communication Server is being setup to allow electronic transfer of data with outside agencies (DMV, State Board of Equalization, Phoenix, etc.) to eliminate handling of magnetic media. All maintenance and support of the selected systems would be done in-house. This would eliminate any additional expense for program application support or extended warranty. The final step of this 3rd phase would be the tape archive of the HP3000 data, Micro -Fiche of critical documents, and decommission of all hardware, software, and cabling for the HP3000. Concur: Respectfu,ly submitted, by Eric A Rifi LAN/SYSTEMS Engineer July 30, 1993 Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of August 10, 1993 FRANCHISE RENEWAL EXTENSION Recommendation /d-rr'L3 It is recommended by the Cable Television Advisory Board and staff that City Council approve the attached letter of agreement to extend the existing agreement with MultiVision for a period of four (4) months from the set franchise expiration in order to provide the Board additional time to review the impacts of the Cable Television Act of 1992 . Background The Franchise agreement between MultiVision Cable and the City of Hermosa Beach is set to expire in October, 1993. To date, the Board has been working diligently to proceed with assessing community needs and evaluating the operator's past performance in order to proceed with a • responsible franchise renewal process. The Board has adopted a basic strategy of using the ordinances Manhattan Beach adopted as a baseline for negotiations with MultiVision while incorporating items unique to Hermosa Beach (such as an additional consumer protection ordinance). The Board has elected to hire Cable Television experts (CSG consultants) to evaluate the proposed ordinances from a technical standpoint; to evaluate the financial solvency of MultiVision; and to determine what the strengths and weaknesses of the Manhattan Beach ordinances are. CSG will also critique the City's proposed ordinances and will compare the provisions of each with State and Federal mandates. All expenses from this study are charged to the $15,000 the City received from MultiVision for renewal related expenses. pagel 1 I J Analysis In evaluating the proposed ordinances, it has become important to look at the provisions of the Cable Act of 1992 in order to determine whether it is in the best interests of the City to enforce its own ordinance or to rely on the federal mandates on a point by point basis. The City may elect to enforce the provisions of either but to do so must notify the cable operator in writing of which standards will be applied in each case. Rate regulation is another provision of the Cable Act of 1992 and the City must decide if and how this regulation will occur. It is clearly to the City's advantage to take the additional time to obtain accurate information from the consultant and to review the rulemaking from the FCC in order to formulate the most comprehensive ordinances for Cable Television Franchise operation. If the City adopted ordinances and proceeded with the renewal process without a clear understanding of the Cable Act, it is likely the City would be faced with subsequent clean-up work to bring the ordinances in line with regulations. (FISCAL IMPACT: NO IMPACT ON THE BUDGET. Respectfully Submitted, Ma Act oney City Manager Concur: Charles S. Vose, City Attorney page2 City of 42Iermosa ¶J3eack. August 3!1993 Mr. Donald R. Granger Regional Vice President MultiVision Cable TV 3041 East Miraloma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92806 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 RE: CATV FRANCHISE RENEWAL -EXTENSION OF EXISTING FRANCHISE WITH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Dear Mr. Granger: The City of Hermosa Beach is continuing to pursue a schedule for consideration of the franchise renewal that has been requested by MultiVision. Based upon the work being accomplished by the City's Cable Television Advisory Board and the need for further clarification of the new regulations adopted by the Federal Government, it does not appear that we will be able to schedule a City Council public hearing on the franchise renewal before the end of this calendar year. We recognize that the current franchise terminates in October of 1993. In order to properly consider the franchise renewal in accordance with applicable federal rules and procedures and to not negatively impact current levels of service to the residents of the City of Hermosa Beach, it is recommended that the current franchise be extended for a period of four months. It is the understanding of the City Council that you have already received a copy of the proposed amendments to the franchise regulations and franchise ordinance which are being considered by the Cable Television Advisory Board. Furthermore, there are ongoing negotiations between representatives of the City and MultiVision concerning the terms of the franchise renewal. Mr. Donald R. Granger August 3, 1993 Page 2 Based upon prior correspondence and discussions with MultiVision, the City Council has agreed to the requested four month extension of the existing franchise in order to meet the above schedule. Please advise the City immediately if this four month extension of the existing franchise upon all current terms applicable is not acceptable to MultiVision. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. We look forward to hearing from you concerning the continued scheduling of informal meetings to conclude this franchise renewal process. Reviewed and Accepted: By: Donald R. Granger MultiVision Cable T.V. Date: Very truly yours, Charles S. Vose City Attorney August 3, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council August 10, 1993 DENY REQUEST FOR INSTALLATION OF MULTIWAY STOP CONTROLS ON PROSPECT AVENUE AT 7TH STREET Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council deny the request for installation of STOP controls on Prospect Avenue at 7th Street. Background: Several residents of Seventh Street on the east and west side of Prospect Avenue have expressed concern to Public Works staff of the need for four way stop controls at the subject intersection. They expressed difficulty in exiting Seventh Street due to parked vehicles on Prospect Avenue blocking their view and the speed of vehicles on Prospect passing by Seventh Street. Analysis: In the vicinity of the Prospect Avenue/7th Street intersection there are numerous four way (or Multiway) STOP controlled intersections. To the south Prospect STOPs at 5th and 6th streets. To the north Prospect STOPs at 9th Street. The section of Prospect between 6th and 9th Streets is one of the short sections left along this route that do not have STOP controls on Prospect. A review of reported accident records for five years prior to July 1993, do not indicate any accidents involving vehicles exiting 7th Street and being struck on Prospect Avenue. Traffic volume levels on Prospect in the vicinity of 7th Street have increased from 9,805 vehicles per day (vpd) in 1988 to in excess of 12,000 vpd in 1990. thus it is reasonable to expect that it would be more difficult for Seventh Street traffic to enter the Prospect traffic stream. Seventh Street traffic has remained constant at approximately 1,200 vpd. Field reviews indicate there are gaps provided in Prospect Avenue traffic due to the existing STOP controls at 9th and 6th Streets. A comparison of the nationally recognized warrants for multiway STOP controls (attached) indicates that while there is significant traffic volume entering the intersection on an average for an eight hour day (3a) there is not sufficient traffic/pedestrian volume on Seventh Street to satisfy 3b of the warrant. 1 1I( Increased sight lines for emerging Seventh Street traffic and Prospect Avenue users can be accomplished if curb parking is removed on the east side of Prospect between 6th and 8th Streets. The loss of spaces would amount to between six and eight spaces on the eastside of Prospect. The lack of a traffic volume warrant and excellent accident history outweigh the inconvenience to Prospect Avenue traffic which exceeds Seventh Street volumes by almost 10 to 1. The present operation is operationally effective and safe for the users. To enhance sight lines curb parking removal should be considered along Prospect Avenue, especially in view of future volume level increases along the main corridor, Prospect Avenue. Alternative Solutions: 1. Install four way STOP controls 2. Remove six to eight curb parking spaces along Prospect Avenue between 6th and 8th Streets to increase sight distance. Respectfully submitted, Concur: -DCL�7�--LCI �• ,�LG�}�� Edward J. Ru�ak 6% City Traffic Engineer Exhibits: Stop Sign Warrant pworks/denystop (-‘7-4 Amy Amk ani Director of Public Works I Mar -oon Acting City Manager y Traffic Manual SIGNS R1 Standard 30" 4-37 3-1987 POLICY Stop Signs and Yield Signs • Stop Signs The STOP sign (R1) shall be used where traffic is required to stop except at signalized intersections. The STOP sign shall be an octagon with white mes- sage and border on a red background. The standard size shall be 30 x 30 inches. Where greater emphasis or visibility is required, a larger size is recommended. On local streets and secondary roads with low ap- proach speeds and low volume, a 24 x 24 inch size may be used. R1-3 At a multiway stop intersection, a supplemental plate MMI (R1-3 or R1-4) should be mounted just below each Standard 12" x6" STOP sign. R1-4 ti�bt? WAY. Standard 18" x 6" The numeral on the supplementary plate shall corres- pond to the number of approach legs, or the legend ALL -WAY (R1-4) may be used. The plate shall -have white letters on a red background. A red flashing beacon or beacons may be used in conjunction with a STOP sign. See Section 9-08 (Flashng Beacons). Secondary messages shall not be used on STOP sign faces. • Warrants for STOP Signs Because the STOP sign causes a substantial incon- venience to motorists, it should be used only where warranted. A STOP sign may be warranted at an inter- section where one or more of the following con- ditions exist: 1. On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where application of the normal right of way rule is unduly hazardous as evidenced by accidents susceptible to correction by STOP signs. 2. On a county road or city street at its intersection with a state highway. 3. At the intersection of two main highways. The highway traffic to be stopped depends on ap- proach speeds, volumes, and turning movements. 4. On a street entering a legally established through highway or street. 5. On a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less than 10 miles per hour. 6. At an unsignalized intersection in a signal- ized a—ea. 7. At other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and accident record indi- cates a need for control by the STOP sign. 4-38 SIGNS Traffic Manual 3-1987 POLICY A STOP sign is not a "cure-all" and is not a substitute for other traffic control devices. Many times the need for a STOP sign can be eliminated if the sight distance is increased by remo1ing the obstructions. STOP signs shall not be erected at any entrance to an intersection when such entrance is controlled by an official traffic control signal, nor at any railroad grade crossing which is controlled by automatic signals, gates, or other train -actuated control devices except as provided in CVC 21355, Stop Signs. The conflicting commands of two types of control devices are con- fusing. If traffic is required to stop when the operation of the stop -and -go signals is not warranted, the signals should be put on flashing operation with the red flashing light facing the traffic that must stop. Where two main highways intersect, the STOP sign or signs should normally be posted on the minor street to stop the lesser flow of traffic. Traffic engineering studies, however, may justify a decision to install a STOP sign or signs on the major street, as at a three-way intersection where safety considerations may justify stopping the greater flow of traffic to permit a left -turning movement. STOP signs should not be installed indiscriminately at all unprotected railroad crossings. The allowance of STOP signs at all such crossings would eventually breed contempt for both law enforcement, and obedience to the sign's command to stop. STOP signs. may only be used at selected rail/highway grade crossings after their need has been determined by a traffic engineering study. Such study should consider approach speeds, sight distance restrictions, volumes, accident records, etc. This application of STOP signs should be an interim use period during which plans for lights, gates or other means of control are being prepared. Portable or part-time STOP signs shall not be used except for emergency purposes. Also, STOP signs should not be used for speed control. • Multiway STOP signs The "Multiway Stop" installation may be useful at some locations. It should ordinarily be used only where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approx- imately equal. A traffic control signal is more satisfactory for an intersection with a heavy volume of traffic. Cl C� Traffic Manual SIGNS 4-39 3-1987 POLICY Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi - way STOP sign installation: 1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installations. 2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation. Such accidents include right - and left -turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Minimum traffic volumes (a) The total vehicular volume entering the inter- section ntersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and (b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but (c) When the 85 -percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements. July 19, 1993 City Council Meeting August 10, 1993 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 93-1094 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 93-1094, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of July 13, 1993, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Concur: Mary , Interim City Manager Elaine Doerfling, C e g, y rk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 93-1094 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees Retirement System is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit, and by such reference made part hereof as though herein set out in full. SECTION 2. The President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from its adoption, and prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days from the passage thereof shall be published at least once in the EasyReader, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 10th day of August, 1993. ATTEST PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California • • , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1/14e44:� ka, , City Attorney r` AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY, OF HERMOSA BEACH The Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of above public agency, hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective July 1, 1952, and witnessed June 24, 1952, and as amended effective December 1, 1956, August 1, 1962, October 1, 1964, June 1, 1979, April 1, 1980, October 1, 1981, February 1, 1983, January 1, 1986 and April 14, 1993, which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Paragraphs 1 through 12 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective April 14, 1993, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1 through 12 inclusive: 1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall mean age 60 for local miscellaneous members and age 50 for local safety members. 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after July 1, 1952 making its employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting agency. 3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Local Fire Fighters (herein referred to as local safety members); b. Local Police Officers (herein referred to as local safety members). c. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: a. SCHOOL CROSSING GUARDS HIRED ON OR AFTER DECEMBER 1, 1956; AND b. PERSONS COMPENSATED ON AN HOURLY BASIS EMPLOYED ON OR AF'1 ER OCTOBER 1, 1964. 5. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21251.13 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 60 Full). 6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local safety member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21252.01 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 50 Full). 7. Public Agency elected to be subject to the following optional provisions: a. Sections 21380-21387 (1959 Survivor Benefits) excluding Section 21382.2 (Increased 1959 Survivor Benefits) and Section 21382.4 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits). b. Sections 21263, 21263.1 and 21263.3 (Post -Retirement Survivor Allowance) for local safety members only. c. Section 20930.3 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes of 1976. d. Section 20024.2 (One -Year Final Compensation). 8. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20740, ceased to be an "employer" for purposes of Section 20759 effective on April 1, 1980. Accumulated contributions of Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20759, and accumulated contributions thereafter shall be held by the Board as provided in Government Code Section 20759. 9. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said Retirement System. 10. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows: a. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. 11. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. 12. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the Board. B. This amendment shall be effective on the day of , 19 BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM BY CHIEF, CONTRACT SERVICES DIVISION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM PERS-CON-702 (AMENDMENT) (Rev. 10/92) CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY Presiding Officer Witness Date Attest: Clerk „Le).__07a--/ August 5, 1993 Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council August 10, 1993 ORDINANCE NO. 93-1096 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS.” Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 93-1096, relating to the above. At the meeting of July 27, 1993, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was amended on page 1, line 20, to delete the word "control," thus changing the sentence to read "...including, but not limited to, operation and management of parking places..." The ordinance, as amended, was then introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Benz, Essertier, Mayor Pro Tem Edgerton Midstokke Mayor Wiemans None PLEASE NOTE: As introduced, the ordinance will dissolve both the current Vehicle Parking District and the Board of Parking Place Commissioners, as specified in the ordinance title and in the provisions of Section 2 (page 6, line 19) of the ordinance, as well as create a Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission, as specified in Section 1 of the ordinance. While Section 2 dissolves the current Vehicle Parking District, Section 1 (page 4, line 21, under Sec. 2-141) defines the real property to be included within the review of the new Commission as the "boundaries of the current Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District," which technically would not exist once the ordinance is enacted. Since this is the wording that will appear in the City's Municipal Code, Council may wish to consider revising the wording of Sec. 2-141 to define the boundaries as that of the "former" VPD, or wording to that effect. Also, as noted above, eliminate "control" of change has been made. of parking places, was provision for possible Council amended page 1 of the ordinance to parking places by the new Commission, and that Line 9 on page 2, which also refers to "control" not amended, and Council may wish to review that revision. As you know, additional amendments to the document will require re- introduction and waiver of full reading at this meeting, with the ordinance coming back for adoption at the next meeting. ney, Interim City Manager i Elaine Doerflingr Cit Clerk 2b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 93-1096 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. WHEREAS, the Vehicle Parking District was established in 1964 pursuant to the Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943 (California Streets and Highways Code, Section 31500 et seq.), and; WHEREAS, a separate Board of Parking Place Commissioners has been appointed by the City Council pursuant to the Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943 to oversee the activities of the Vehicle Parking District; and WHEREAS, there is a need to expand the permissible range of activities under the jurisdiction of the current Board of Parking Place Commissioners that can be performed by such district within the borders of the geographical district constituting the current Vehicle Parking District including, but not limited to, opera- tion and management of parking places, promotion of public events which benefit businesses in the area, promotion of tourism and business within the area, capital improvement projects within the district, and activities which benefit busi-nesses located and operating in the area; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization of businesses in general and the physical appear- ance and maintenance of the downtown business district of the I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 City of Hermosa Beach in the area now known as the Vehicle Parking District in order to create jobs, attract new business and expand the existing tax base for the City of Hermosa Beach; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to replace the Vehicle Parking District with a Downtown Area Enhancement District Commission as a separate commission with the authority to set and establish parking policy within the district and supervise and control parking places within the district consistent with the legislative authority and review of the City Council, and to make recommendations to the City Council on the leasing of said parking lots, acquisition of additional parking places and the expenditure of revenues to promote the enhancement of business in general and the physical appearance of the district; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to dedicate to the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission all revenues here- tofore accumulated by the Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District as well as those revenues which will henceforth be accumulated from the operations of the public parking lots within the district for use in implementing those recommendations to be made to the City Council by said Commission for the purposes specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 13350 2 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .SECTION 1. Article XV of Chapter Two of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "ARTICLE XV. DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION Sec. 2-140. Created; Composition; Terms There is hereby created a Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission which shall consist of the five (5) members. The current members of the Board of Parking Place Commission shall serve as the initial members of the Commission. Following the appointment of Commission members for their initial staggered terms, Commission members shall serve for a period of four (4) years and no member shall remain on said Commission for a period of time longer than two (2) consecutive terms. If a vacancy shall occur otherwise than by expiration of term, it shall be filled by appointment by the City Council for the unexpired portion of the term. Upon the expiration of a full term, each member of the Commission shall serve until a successor is appointed and qualified, except that in the event of a written resignation filed with the City Manager and accepted by action of the City Council, said resignation shall become effective on the date set forth therein. Two (2) absences from regularly scheduled meetings of any member within one (1) calendar quarter, and/or four absences from regular meetings within one (1) calendar year creates an auto- matic vacancy. There shall be no distinction between excused or unexcused absences. When an automatic vacancy occurs, the staff liaison shall promptly notify the City Council, the Commission and the member. The automatic vacancy shall not be effective 13350 3 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 until Council receives notice and fails to waive application of this section. The City Council may waive application of the automatic vacancy upon its own motion; otherwise, the vacancy so created shall be filled pursuant to this section. Commissioners shall be persons of business experience and ability. Commissioners may be owners or lessees of real property within the district.. Commissioners meeting these requirements may be residents or non-residents of the City of Hermosa Beach. Sec. 2-141. Declaration of Purpose. The City Council finds and declares that it is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization and physical appearance and maintenance of the business districts in the city in order to create jobs, attract new businesses, and prevent erosion of the business districts. The City Council finds and declares that providing improvements and promoting activities which benefit these business districts confer benefits upon the community and upon the business districts for which the improve- ments and activities are provided. The real property to be included within the review and recommendations of the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission shall be the boundaries of the current Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District. These boundaries may be extended and expanded as recommended by the Commission and approved by the City Council. Sec. 2-142. Commission Duties; Responsibilities; Activities The duties, responsibilities and activities of the Commission shall include the authority to set and establish parking policy for the public lots within the District boundaries, subject to review by the City Council. This authority shall include, but 13350 4 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 not be limited to, the setting of parking lot rates, hours of operation, signage, maintenance, and preferential parking policy, including the use of and cost paid for validations by the businesses within the district, daily permit parking, monthly permit parking, and special event parking. The Commission shall also review and make recommendations to the City Council for any and all contracts, agreements, leases and renewal of leases for the operation of the public parking lots within the district and for the study of and acquisition of additional parking places within the district. The Commission shall further review, study and make recommendations to the City Council for the expenditure of revenues from the funds described in Section 2-143 herein for all activities, promotions and improvement projects which enhance business in general and the appearance of the district as a whole. With the revenue received by the City from these parking lots and prior accumulated funds of the Vehicle Parking District, the Commission shall prepare a budget for and make recommendations to the City Council for the funding of certain improvements and activities to benefit and enhance the designated business district. The type or types of improvements and activities that may be proposed to be funded by the Commission include, but is not limited to, the following: (a) acquisition of additional parking; (b) construction of parking structures; (c) landscaping, sidewalk and street improvements; 13350 5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (d) benches, trash receptacles, fountains, street lighting; (e) promotional activities which enhance business and tourism within the district; (f) retention of professional consultants to advise the Commission and City Council on any activity within the jurisdiction of the Commission; (g) Other improvements and activities which confer special benefits upon the businesses for which the improvements and activities are provided. Sec. 2-143. Funding of Improvements and Activities. The above improvements and activities will be funded from the revenues heretofore accumulated by the Vehicle Parking District and those revenues generated from the parking areas designated above and any other revenues that may become available to the Commission. There will be no assessments imposed upon businesses or property owners within the District to fund the activities of the Commission. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby dissolves and terminates the Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District No. 1. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of 13350 6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceed- ings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1993. President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: atv_ L_ l//2l , City Attorney 13350 7. Mauor Albert Wiemans 1315 Dalley Drive --Hermosa Eeach CA Ref: Improperly conducted City Council meeting on 7-27-93 Dear Mayor: August 1, 1993 On July 19, 1993 I submitted a letter to the City of Hermosa Beach and it was agendized under "WRITTEN COMMUNICATION" L±Cd) For the regular July 27, 1993 meeting of the City Council. Councilmember Midstokke also agendized an item under "OTHER MATTERS -CITY COUNCIL" 17(d). Her letter was dated 7-22-93. I am formally requesting that you review the meeting's video tape and consult with City Attorney Vose or Mr. Lee as a last resort, to determine the impropriety, legality and conduct of the meeting and the conducted of Mayor Pro -tem Edgerton. Specific questions to be addresses are: On request by Councilmember Midstokke to discuss both items at the same time, Chairman Eggerton combined my item 'i(d) with Ms. Midstokke's 17(d). Nate..I did not request nor condone Chairman's Edgerton's decision to combine the two item reqest Ms. Midstokke carefully defined both letters as having the same subject, (the Ironman), but stated both letters had different questions or directions For the Council to give. Such as: Midstokke: Quote..."We have two things, Mr. Sullivan, seems to be directed on the past events of this 'nth of July and what went on...My request was For a policy discussion on behalf of the Council for Future events!" Unquote Ms. Midstokke then read the Chief's policy recommendations on how to handle next years Ironman Contest and immediately made a motion to support the policy. RECEIVED AUG 0 2 1993 CITY MGR. OFFICE Mr. Essertier seconded the motion After a brief discussion by all Councilmembers directly related to Ms. Midsokke's 17Cd) letter on the Chief's memo dealing with future Ironman competition, Mr. Edgerton declared the Item Finished and asked the clerk for the next item. Ms. Midstokke objected and informed the Councilmember that a motion was on the Floor and seconded. Mr Edgerton declared a 4-0 vote had been taken in Favor of the police Chief's proposal. Please check the video tape! Note...No vote had been taken!!! Note...No discussion of my item had taken place!!! 1 of 2 a The balance of the meeting was spent in conflict, Edgerton declared it wasn't a public meeting and wouldn't let Mr. Lissnor speak. He allowed me a Few minutes to speak but wouldn't gavel two Councilmembers to order. After he threatened me with a suggestion that I shouldn't blow it I left the podium in disgust. During my brief speaking period, I asked the Chairman to request the City Attorney to determine the following: Conflict of interest questions regarding City Councilmembers being aware of, or being part of, the Ironman Competition and violations on the beach. He refused !!! I asked that the City Council respond to my agendized written communication questions, including my request that the City Council conduct an investigation at the appropriate legal level (City Prosecutor, County District attorneys's office etc.) which has subpoena powers and affidavits to determine the extent of any violations as well as the possible prosecution of Councilman Benz. Note...Mr. Edgerton refused to allow the City Council to discuss my specific 4(d) subject Cnot Ms. Midstokke's 17(d)] as approve by the original City Council straw vote polling to discuss Item's 4(d) and 17(d). Since Mr Edgerton is a lawyer and a member of the American Bar Association, and as such an "officer of the court" as well as a City Councilmember sworn to uphold the law and his oath of office, the citizens of Hermosa have a right to determine (to know) if some of their Councilmembers are bad guys, crooks or just plain stupid in aiding and abetting in the endangerment (intoxication) of our young adult children. I request these questions be address at the next regular City Council meeting. Please agendize this communications as well as informing the City Attorney of my questions. Mr. Eggerton's politically astute, quick shuffle and /or possible obstruction of justice should not be allowed to stand. In addition the official badges that some Councilmen have and insisted be issued should immediately be return to the City Manager until it can be asertain they were not used in the commission of a crime on our beaches. Richard J. Sullivan 82'1 3rd Street Hermosa Beach CA 2 of 2 For a better city, En CI osecl �e.ev- d431-++&c7-/9-2� plye_ 1 e1-11ey doted 7 -2z -?j 1 p 1L. TZi1 y 1990 Sas/ Rcgdc r 1 Pale_ 0C NCA !Aro(*I4 n. _Ms. Mary Rooney, City Manager 1315 Dalley Drive Hermosa Beach CA Ref: Ironman Compitition, dereliction of duty and conspiracy to violate municipal laws. Ms. Rooney: July 19, 1993 I have enclosed a copy of the July 15, 1993 edition of the "Easy Reader" which shows a picture of Councilmember R. Benz addressing a crowd at the annual "Ironman Competition" held on our beach located around 30th Street. In addition, on July 16, 1993 Multivision TU, Channel 3, televised a segment of the same illegal beach activity. As you know the Ironman competition requires the participants to run -a -mile, swim -a -mile and drink a six pack of beer with- out vomiting. The competition is judge on a best time factor with special awards given to the persons (boys or girls) that have the best/biggest (vomit) throw -up as seen by the judges. The Multivision televised coverage clearly. shows: A) Youthful participants (girls and boys) drinking on the public beach in violation of Hermosa's municipal code. B) Youthful participants voluntarily and involuntarily barfing vomit onto the city's sandy beach, while being encouraged by the crowds of youth and older adult organizers to drink Faster and vomit more grossly. C) Considering the hazards, the event appeared to have insufficient lifeguards, medical personnel, security and clean-up,crews for the beer cans, vomit and brown bags. D) Police officers arriving late and not issuing citations to the organizers or to the participant for drinking or for public intoxication. In essence, this means that possible intoxicated participants were allowed to endanger not only themselves but also the general public on the beach and on public streets while driving home. (I believe the non -action placed liability on the City) In addition, the following questions should be addressed: E) Which adult organizer assumed event responsibility for checking minimum drinking ages of participants? 1 of 3 F) Did the organizers obtain any city or state permits? G) Since bodily fluids (vomit) were freely dispersed on public property, were the participants required to have a medical check-up. Are the fluids still there? H) Has/did any money changed hands between organizers and participants? Who paid for the beer and insurance ? I) Were lifeguards warned of the extra activity at the north end of the beach? Couldn't they see the crowd? J) When did the police receive indications of illegal activity on the beach. (review radio call tapes) K) Is it typical practice For the Hermosa Beach Police not to issue citations or written warning citations for alcoholic violations within the city limits? Should they at least Find out if a violater is a minor and is not a hazard to himself or others. L) Did the organizers obtain liability insurance? M) Since it was organized and controlled by a well known City Councilman, could or would participants consider the event ostensibly a city sanctioned (run) event?. N) Would/could the liability for injured beach visitors, participants and citizens be transferred to the city. 0) Considering a minimum of at least one six pack was consumed in a hurried fashion, have there been any reports of internal injuries from the excessive and quick consumption of alcohol and the induced vomit - ting or possible drunk driving accidents or fist fights that intoxicated youth usually get in. P) Has the City of Hermosa notified the State of California, Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) about the uncontrolled use oF alcohol within it's city? Q) Were city officials such as department heads or other Councilmembers (sworn to uphold the law), aware of Councilmember Benz's intentions to violate the law. R) Has the City Manager or Chief of Police initiated an investigation as yet and if not, why not? S) Participants verbally abusing the past Chief oF Police who was intimately involved in bringing this event under municipal code and control in past years. 2 of 3 T) Did Multivision and the Ironman competition producers obtain a City film permit and pay the appropriate fees? Has/did Multivision assume any of the liability ? As you know the Ironman competition has been a well known problem for Hermosa officials for many years. There can be no question that the three or four older adult organizers who lead Hermosa's youth down a very dangerous path did conspire to violate the municipal code or/and state law. As a citizen, I am requesting that the City of Hermosa conduct an investigation at the appropriate legal level, (City prosecutor, County District Attorney's office etc) which has subpoena powers and the ability to take affidavits to determine the extent of any violations as well as the prosecution of Councilmember Benz who obviously is aware of the city's permits requirements and the prohibition of alcoholic usage on the public beaches. Ms. Rooney, I would appreciate your prompt attention and the addition of this letter to the , 1333 City Council agenda under written communications. A -TA 21 19 9 3 Richard J. Sullivan 82`i 3rd Street Hermosa Beach CA For a better city, 7-27 c.c. City Council Agenda of -53-1-0-93 Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) L.A. County District Attorney L.A. County Lifeguard District L.A. Times Daily Breeze Beach Reporter 3 of 3 SLi y i s, i 1 7_3 8 Easy Reader/Redondo Beach News Hermosa Beach Councilman Robert Benz, in his Burgie persona, leads Ironman participants in the Star Spangled Banner before the July 4 run - paddle -chug competition on the beach at 30th Street. Photo by Mike Macdonald July 12, 1993 City Council Meeting July 27, 1993 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: COUNCILMEMBER MIDSTOIRE 1014• RE: 17 (e) Additional 20 minute parking Hermosa Avenue near Bank of America 17 (d) Request for report from Police Chief regarding July 4, 1993 Ironman Event and council policy for future events l7(c) It is respectfully requested that the C ider making another parking space a 20 minute green zone adjacent to Council cthe sBank of America on . Hermosa A venue. There is currently one green space adjacent to the two (2) Bank of Americo Versateller machines facing Hermosa Beach. Within the last(2) additional machines around the corner act the year, the bank has installed two (2) a„ nou nt of can drivingfparking lot. This has increased the up to use the attritional machines. Although there is current council policy to not issue a ticket 'the violator is ung back and the to his carparking enforcement tell me this is not what is�Q sees the violator present, I have had citizens me the tickets telling the happening in the field. The officers are instead going ahead and they are "too late for it to be taken back. Other citizens have told me they have gone ahead and used the pay Si SO to �r based on parking lot, and have had to being parked less than 10 minutes for using the Versateller. Yet this conflicts with other people saying a limited amount of tune 10 or 15 minutes, free in the lot without obtaining any validation. If there is a limited e time in the lotdd suggest that a sign be posted near the Versatellers informing the public � this. ' I *o 17(4) It is respectfully requested that the City Council request a report from the Police Chief regarding the event this year, why the beach wits allowed to he used and his suggestions for future events. After we rerla the report, I would request that we consider Council policy regarding future events. I have received many complains regarding the Iraaman event this 4th ofJuly mostly regarding the issues of : drinking on the beach, the of the Sir blockage 8 atm and underage pe+opk drinking. Many of these were a rend: of our local cable company, MulsaVision filming splaying a tape of this event on ow' public access chmwel. Although some might have the opinion that this is a historic and cultural event, as elected officials we cannot turn ow backs on the violation of numerous Ordinances and State Laws. There are many events that occur on ow beaches, both commercial and private and we do not allow then: to violate laws. We strictly airforce no beach durin the volleyball tournaments. The Strand walkway is never backe on these everts. g Although the City does not issue a pmt for this event, and no one wiv volunrarily co,we forward as the event promoters, we certainly have notice that the event will be occurring g year after year, with or without permits. It is incumbent upon its to set some policy for the 1wzure events and the enforcement of ow Ordinances and Laws. 1 Tcsd �.9 y Qele. wry ►d�3 Robert Benz File photo by Erie Sabrofi • by Terri Vermeulen :..• A local "Ironman" and former Hermosa Beach city coundl can- didate=who was fined $281 for !taking a sporting event described by police as "not well Controlled"— said Tuesday he will fight the bill from the dty. • Robert Benz, also popularly' known as' "Burgie" on a local. MultiVision cable talk show,. organized the "Ironman Compe- tition." The 45 -minute competi- tion is an annual Fourth of July event in which about 100 people run a mile, paddle a mile on long (surf) boards and chug a six-pack of beer. But police, who are charging Benz for the time 10 police em- ployees spent at the scene, said that the 'crowd of 1,500 to 2,000. • which gathered for the event could have been "potentially danger- ... • "It was not a situation that could be in control," Hermosa Beach Police Commander Anthony Altfeld said. "Neither Robert Benz nor the Hermosa Beach police depart- ment could control 11 The people down there were in control:" The police department, which sent 10 officers to respond to complaints about the event, wasn't able to do anything, Altfeld said. "We stood by, started moving ..the crowd at the end of the event and hoped that it didn't start to be a rock and ball throwing event," Altfeld added. Police found some observers sitting on a nearby house under construction, as well as widespread use of alcohol on the beach.The aowd also congested. the Strand, police said. Police would have had to summon aid from other adjacent cities' police departments to make any arrests there, Altfeld said. . The event could have been "a lot worse' if July 4, which fell on a Wednesday this year, had been on a weekend, police said. "The event started off as set for lova s, a fun, cute little event. Each year it's �� Altfeldsaid" ie alcohol and the number of people make it a risky situation." "Fortunately no one was hurt. I ►10 Benz said he'd like to a a permit to hold the event beach. But he says there's ing that can stop 100 guys running, 100 guys from and 100 guys from dogging "It looks like I'm going to to appeal it to the city Benz said, adding that he he can garner support from' council majority. Benz—who lost the No 1989 council election to C man Albert Wiemans by 37 and hasn't decided yet w run again—said he'd still be ganizing the event even if he a council seat. "It's not very politically Benz admitted. ER ro �.i a . ��y ' .l �C �' �, a,2•NfA Ci. r. •, ' � i�!ay�nom, '� .�o..5a�-.rr, . . o � �� theC• ;�o'0..� !ci c�1►•^2i,,� OG G2a 'Dani roir� F g G O ..p= Oti omdb;; .a aQ �x $°" d>, a 8. d .4 °'o,. u � .a w "6., b 3 8 .8gx a °w c6 •! rd,oa +a, G a, a.a. .�c o wa�, A g.a �n eoggo'a ri ctiya:HP 0x9��.�,,,,r,� a,a,3-.$v.2o.a:-I. tea r1 t81�'osaila>, 1 y.v0 IP eilinqiiittalPhincliriThiqffieki L ALCOHOL IS SO COMMON THAT MOST PEOPLE DO NOT REALIZE IT IS A 'POWERFUL DRUG ! Did You know: 7 out of 10 adults drink at least occasionally. 9 out of 10 high school seniors have tried alcohol more than once. It requires one hour for the alcohol from one drink to leave the body. Drinking more than rl1nooneohourlcauseslintoxdication; 5 oz. of wine or 12 oz. of bee Distribution of alcohol in the body: A. It enters the blood stream rapidly. B. It reaches the brain affecting a person's judgement, feelings and coordination. C. It is broken down by the liver, lungs and kidneys at a rate of Is oz. per hour. Stages of intoxication: A. Happy, talkative, social, relaxed. B. Excited, emotional, uncontrolled behavior, slowed reactions. C. Confused, staggering, disoriented, slurred speech. D. Unable to stand or walk, in a stupor. E. Unconscious, coma, breathing may stop, can result in death. ‘2-46°-/a/ A',(:=)y y S' -/e August 3, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council August 10, 1993 SUBJECT: NONCONFORMING REMODEL 93-3, APPEAL LOCATION: 850 8TH PLACE APPELLANT/: GREG AND BETTE TUCKER APPLICANT 850 8TH PLACE, HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO APPEAL THE DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION TO REQUIRE A 17 -FOOT GARAGE SETBACK AS PART OF THE EXPANSION OF A NONCONFORMING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A GREATER THAN 50% INCREASE IN VALUATION Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation Sustain the decision of the Planning Commission by adopting the attached resolution. Background At their meeting of July 6, 1993, the Planning Commission approved the requested expansion of a nonconforming building for a greater than 50% increase in valuation (72%). The Commission's approval, however, was subject to the condition that the existing nonconforming garage setback be brought up to the current code required 17 feet. Thus the only remaining nonconformity would be the east side yard of 3 feet. Analysis The existing dwelling is nonconforming because of a deficient garage setback (12.6 feet rather than 17. feet) and a deficient east side yard (3 feet rather than .5 feet). 'Article 13 of the zoning ordinance, pertaining to Nonconforming Buildings and Uses, allows remodeling and expansion of such nonconforming buildings up to a 50% increase in valuation as a matter of right. An applicant may also request greater than 50%, up to a 100% increase, subject to approval by the Planning Commission (Section 13-7(B). In this case the applicant was requesting a 72% increase to add two stories to the rear of the existing building; adding a "family room" on the first floor, a master bedroom and bath on the second floor, and a roof deck. The goals of Article. 13 are to allow reasonable expansions of buildings in sound condition, but to prohibit remodeling and expansion of buildings which by current standards are "exceptionally undersized, dilapidated, significantly overdense, or do not meet even the minimal standards of parking or setback." In other words, existing significant nonconformities should not be perpetuated. In this case, the Planning Commission determined that while the deficient side yard setback was not a significant concern, the substandard garage setback was significant. Therefore, the Commission determined, based on the existing first floor plan that includes a substantial storage area behind the garage, that it would be feasible to move back the face of the garage, and move the rear wall back to provide a standard garage with a 17 -foot setback. This solution was believed to be a reasonable "trade-off" for the applicant in order to justify the greater than 50% increase. The Commission was especially concerned in this case because the front property line is located on the edge of the sidewalk, meaning that if a car parked behind the garage it would encroach over the sidewalk. The applicant has provided some additional information, not provided to the Commission, with estimates of the cost of remodeling the garage to meet the 17 -foot setback (attached). The applicant states he would have to pay what amounts to an extra 25%. In response, staff would argue that it is reasonable for the City to expect extra expense to make a project more conforming, and thus to justify the greater than 50% increase. The applicant always has the option to reduce the scale of the expansion to 50% or less. For further analysis, please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report. ' BUR: Ken Robertson Associate Planner Michael Sc ubach Planning Director Mar,oo y Int rim City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Letter from applicant 3. P.C. Resolution 93-45 4. P.C. Minutes 7/6/93 5. P.C. Staff Report with attachments 6. Estimate to set back garage 7. Correspondence from neighbors p/pcsr850 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FOR EXCEPTION, PURSUANT TO SECTION 13-7(B) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ALLOW AN EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO EXCEED 50% OF REPLACEMENT VALUE, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT A 17 -FOOT GARAGE SETBACK BE PROVIDED, AT 850 8TH PLACE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 49 TRACT NO. 8386 WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on August 10, 1993, to consider the applicant's appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission to impose a condition to require a 17 -foot garage setback as part of their approval of this request and to receive oral and written testimony on the matter, and; WHEREAS, after considering the decision of the Planning Commission, and the testimony at the public hearing, the City Council agrees with the Planning Commission, and agrees with the findings of the Planning Commission, as contained in P.C. Resolution 93-45, which are hereby incorporated by reference; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby sustain the decision of the Planning Commission to approve an exception, pursuant to Section 13-7(B) of the zoning ordinance subject to the conditions as contained in P.C. Resolution 93-45, which is hereby incorporated by reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1993. day of PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK 6.;)2C CITY ATTORNEY p/ccrs850 TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 38 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Accident Analysis ALTA Surveys Assessment Engineering Budget Analysis Building A peals Building Design Building Plans Building Inspections CC&Rs Coastal Permits Conditional Use Permits Condominium Budgets Condominium Conversions Condominium Plans Construction Inspection Construction Staking Contract Administration Damage Assessment Drainage Plans D.R.E. .Processing Analysis Earthquake Engineering Electric Service Plans Energy Calculations Erosion Plans Estimatin Expert Witness Feasibility Studies Fire Damage Appraisal Flood Analysis Forensic En neering Foundation Inspections Gas Plans Grading Plans Hydrology Studies Industrial Tank Design Land Planning Landscaping Plan Legal Descriptions Legal Determinations Management Documents Mapping Noticing Ma s ParkingPlans Pinks Whites Presentations Radius Mqps Remodel Plans Reserve Account Analysis Seismic Rehabilitation Sewer Plan Shoring Design Solar Reports Solar System Design Special- Use Permits Storm Drain Plans Street Lighting Plans Street Plans Street Tree Plans Structural A_ ppraisals Structural Dresi Structural Dra ng Supervision Surveys Tract Maps Utilities Plans Utility Easements Variances Water Plans WorkingDrawings Zone anges August 3, 1993 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1015 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach Ca. RECEIVED AUG 2 1993 PLANNING DEPT. (FP3r39 (310) 376-8849 RE: 850 Eighth Place Proposed Tucker Remodel 93 3304 The. Tuckers find themselves in a difficult situation, they have proposed to construct approximately 900 sf of new addition to their existing house at an estimated cost of $100,000. Since their existing structure has some non conformities the Planning Department decided they must seek Planning Commission approval for the proposed remodel. They probably wanted and needed a Variance but they had a Hearing to Allow a Non -Conforming Remodel -on July 6, 1993. The Commission approved the remodel but imposed a condition that the Tuckers add two parking spaces under the structure by removing the Garage Doors, removing three center posts, breaking through the back of the garage wall onto a storage area and constructing a new double garage door 17 feet in from the property line. The cost of this condition is at least $25,000 (see estimates attached). This amounts to a 25% increase in their cost and may make it impossible for them to undertake the project. The Tuckers like Hermosa Beach. They have lived here the seven years since they were married and would hate to have to leave. One of the main reasons they live here is to send their children to the Hermosa Beach School System. They have one 4 year old who starts in September and Mrs Tucker is pregnant with their second child. We feel the Planning Commission request is excessive given the circumstances at hand. The Tuckers use their garage for their autos. Parking on Eighth Place is not overly difficult. The house use is not changing. It is single family use now and will be when remodeled. To make sure there is no neighborhood opposition the Tuckers approached the neighbors explained what they wanted and received letters from many. These letters are attached herewith. 'RIAD _y_ We appeal to the City Council to waive this condition in this case and let them proceed with their remodel as proposed. Twenty five thousand dollars is simply too much to ask a young family to pay for two guest parking spaces! S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 93-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR EXCEPTION, PURSUANT TO SECTION 13-7(B) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW AN ADDITION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO EXCEED 50% OF REPLACEMENT VALUE AT 850 8TH PLACE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 49, TRACT NO. 8386 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a hearing on July 6 1993, regarding an application for an exception, pursuant to section 13-7(B), to allow a greater than 50% addition to a nonconforming structure, and made the following findings: A. The applicant is proposing to expand an existing single family dwelling which results in the addition increasing the value 72% of the replacement value of the existing structure; B. The existing nonconformity to be maintained in regards to the side yard setback is not significant in terms of compatibility with neighboring properties; C. The scale of the proposed addition is consistent with the existing development in the neighborhood and does not warrant bringing.the nonconforming side yard into conformance; D. Approval of the addition, is consistent withthe intent and goals of Article 13 of the zoning ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve a request for an exception, pursuant to Sections 13-7 (B) of the zoning ordinance, subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed developmentand demolition shall be in substantial conformance with submitted plans revised in accordance with the conditions below. Any modifications shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Planning Director. 2. The face of the garage shall be setback a minimum of 17 feet from the property line. b O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Final building plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. a. Plans shall be revised to provide a 17 foot setback for the garage, and a 20 -foot depth for the interior of the garage. 4 Precise height shall be reviewed at the time of Building Plan Check, and plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Building Director. 5 The project shall comply with the provisions of Article 13 of the zoning ordinance. 6. Any further remodeling or additions to the structure are subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission. 7. A deed restriction shall be recorded, to limit the use of the property to one dwelling unit, prior to issuing a certificate of occupancy. 8 The approval of this exception to Section 13-7(B) shall be null and void one year from the date of approval unless Building Permits have been obtained. The applicant may apply in writing for an extension of time to the Planning Commission prior to the date of expiration. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Marks,Merl,Oakes,Suard,Chmn.Di Monda NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 93-45 is a true and complete record of the action taken by' the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their re•ula gee ing of July 6, 1993.. 7 Joseph Di •nda, Chairman `zv Date a/pers510 Michael Schubach, Secretary lb C. -nm. Marks felt it was the building owners' responsibility to provide trash areas on the property. Com'n.,Oakes noted the City has already allowed share use. She suggested adding conditions -stating that any property renovation would trigger a requirement for trash enclosure within the property and if the City changes the lot to accommodate parking and needs to use this public right,of way, vacation of City property usage. may be required. MOTION by Chmn. Di Monda,,Seconded by Comm. Suard, to APPROVE this Exception with the following changes: (1) Paragraph A'shall read, "...in that the existinbuilding...", (2) delete Paragraph B, (3) add a fee (consistent with what thespace would produce if a meter were installed) for the use of public right of way; the fee shall be fair and uniform)n`its application in that this situation is pre- existing within the City, (4) add a paragraph giving4Isr City the right to remove this Exception if circumstances require this public right-of-waybeused for other purposes, (5) any renovation above 25% of the building would trigger a conditio -requiring incorpo ation of the trash enclosure within the private property. AYES: Comm. Merl Oakes, Suard, Chmn. Di Monda NOES: Co m�ar Marks ABSENT: ne ABSTAIN• None 9. NR 93-3 -- A REQUEST TO ALLOW A GREATER THAN 50% REMODEL TO AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE IN AN R-1 ZONE AT 850 8TH PLACE. . .Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Mr. Schubach stated Staff felt the garage could be recessed, creating the extra footage required to prevent cars overhanging the right of way. The setback requirement was not significant. . Chmn. Di Monda opened the Hearing at 7:51 p.m. Norm Sunberg, project designer, introduced the applicant. Greg Tucker, 850 8th Place, felt Staffs suggestions were costly and would result in the building being very ugly. After discussing parking requirements, remodeling options and building appearance with the Commissioners, he stated he would drop the project before he would spend money to make the exterior ugly. He noted he was the only family on his street to park in the garage, noting that a local, newer building had not been required to come back the five feet. He requested the plans be approved as proposed, without inclusion of Staffs suggestions. No one else wished to speak relating to this issue, and Chmn. Di Monda closed the Hearing at 8:04 p.m. -3- P.C. Minutes 7-6-93 C C Chmn. Di Monda and Comm. Merl, both, discussed the parking issues. Churn. Di Monda noted the parking study currently being conducted. Comm. Merl stated the Commission had to review property improvements; review the site, not the individuals. MOTION by Comm. Suard, Seconded by Comm. Merl, to APPROVE NR 93-3, with Staff's recommendation to allow the remodel with inclusion of a 17 -feet setback. YES: Comms. Marks, Merl, Oakes, Suard, Chmn. Di Monda NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None This item can be appealed to the City Council within 10 days from the date of this decision. 10. \HLE 93-2 -- REFERRAL FROM THE CITY COUNCIL ON REVIEW/REC N - SIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A HEIGHT IMIT EXCEPTION IN R-3 ZONE AT 20 4TH STREET. Staff Recommended Action: To request indefinite continuance until the text ame dment for minor height exceptions is considered. Mr. Schubach stated Staff reco%mended continuance for renoticing at a fut re date, after the proposed Height Exception Ordinance amendment is adopted. He explained the available alternatives, noting the Council felt findings were neces as r for the Exception under thpcurrent ordinance. Staff believed there were not adequate findings to be ma e, noting changes were/being made to the current ordinance. Chmn. Di Monda opened the Hearing at 8:08 p. No one wished to speak regarding this subject, and Chmn. Di Monda closed the Hearing. MOTION by Comm. Oakes, Seconded by Chmn. Di Mon a, to CONTINUE this item indefinitely. AYES: Comms. Marks, Merl Oakes Suard, Chmn. Di on da NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 11. CUP 92-35 ' EFERRAL FROM THE CITY COUNCIL ON RECONSIDERATION/ REVIE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVA OF A CO P TIONAL USE PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE AN EXISTING P ULT B 3INESS (BOOKSTORE AND THEATER/ARCADE) SUBJECT TO ONDITIONS AT 544 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, FANTASY ARCAD (continued from June 1, 1993 meeting). P.C. Minutes 7-6-93 June 23, 1993 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission July 6, 1993 SUBJECT: NONCONFORMING REMODEL 93-3 LOCATION: 850 8TH PLACE APPLICANT: GREG AND BETTE TUCKER 850 8TH PLACE, HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESULTING IN A REMODEL/EXPANSION OF GREATER THAN 50% INCREASE IN VALUATION WHILE MAINTAINING NONCONFORMING GARAGE AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request, subject to conditions, by adopting the attached resolution, which includes a condition that the garage setback be brought into conformance with the 17 -foot setback requirement. Background PROJECT INFORMATION: Zoning: R-1 General Plan: Low Density Lot Size: 50..X 8,0, 4000 square feet Existing Living Area: 1344 sq. ft. Proposed Addition: 921 sq. ft. Proposed Interior Remodeled Areas: 117 sq. ft. Percent Increase in Valuation: 72 percent (calculated per ordinance) The subject property is located on the south side of 8th Place. The two-story building with garage were originally constructed in 1940. Analysis The applicant is requesting to expand the structure by adding two stories to the rear of the existing building. The proposed addition includes a "family room" on the first floor, a master bedroom and O 9 c bath on the second floor, and a roof deck. The expansion will increase the livable floor area from 1344 square feet to 2265 square feet. The existing structure is nonconforming because of a deficient garage setback (12.6 feet rather than the required 17 feet), and because of a deficient east side yard setback (3 feet rather than 5 feet) . The applicant is requesting Planning Commission approval, pursuant to Section 13-7(B), to allow this addition of greater than 50%, which staff has calculated to be 72% of replacement value. An addition/remodel of less than 50% would not require Planning Commission approval. The basic issues to consider with these types of requests are the severity of the existing nonconformities, and whether the overall amount of the addition and/or remodel warrants bringing the existing portions of the structure up to current codes. In this case, staff does not believe that the existing side setback deficiency is severe. However, the deficient garage setback is a significant issue, especially since the property line is right on the sidewalk. As such, any cars parked behind the garage likely will encroach onto the sidewalk. In other cases where less than 17 -foot garage setbacks have been allowed to be maintained, the deficiency has been less and there was additional right-of-way between the property line and the sidewalk. As such, staff is recommending that the Commission require that the garage setback be made to conform as part of this remodeling/addition process. Since the area to the rear of the garage is storage, it could be reduced in area. Staff has inspected the property and found. that moving the back wall of the garage is possible, since it is not a bearing wall. The applicant, however, is obviously concerned about the added expense, and also.about the resulting awkward appearance of having the face of the garage off-setback from the rest of the house,and would rather not make this additional change. Pursuant to Section 13-7(B), in order to approve this request the Planning Commission must make a finding that the goals, intent and purpose of Article 13 are being met. Staff believes the findings can be made in this case if the garage setback is corrected. With that change the addition is reasonable, and the nonconformity (the sideyard setback) to be maintained is not significant. OTHER CONCERNS As noted by the Building Department the proposed eaves and stairway encroach into the 5' easement at the rear of the property. The plans must be revised to remove these encroachments. Also noted by the Building Department, the new addition has potential for being converted to an additional unit. As such, staff is recommending a condition that a deed restr3.ctior;.jbe� required. CONCUR: Michael chubach Planning Director ol5ertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Area Map 3. Comments from reviewing departments 4. Photographs 5. Zoning Analysis 6. Application p/pcsr510 84CHOROI/ND MATER/AL 9 cy 59 gO lie dbbUSi11.01. UI UOILb III Isl.. anol,lwanr. 1D32 .00E 340 OR PREv. Assm.T. SEE• ,55 - ; sT" 53,t) 6'0 405: 0 3 0 0 6 0 kz • .) 50 40 A Pi 49 •0 15 3 8 902' 415 0 • t6 - gY5 I 0 1 41 9 0 4'i 0 15 9 40 ol 12 .._ • TRACT NO. 8386 M.B 105-92 - 41 a A 4 0 45 '46 0 20 40 40-0 0 0 42 A3 3 0 40 23 '31\ 22 2 1 1 \ e, 91/5 4/1/3 0 ..12 g •r: Z- 4. 0 0 •• tO ; CC:,.•f OF Lci � C CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner FROM: William Grove, Building & Safety Director RE: 850 8th Place DATE: June 7, 1993 **************************************************************** 1) No portion of the building may be erected over the five foot sewer easement. An eave encroachment and an on -grade stairway encroachment are indicated on the plans. 2) The building height is within the allowable 25 foot limit; however, the plans are inconsistent in the elevations indicated on different sheets. (123.10' or 124.5') 3) A deed restriction should be required since the new addition has the potential for conversion to an illegal dwelling unit. 4) Interior floor drains shall be connected to the sanitary sewer (not a curb outlet). Inadequate provisions are indicated for exterior area drains. (A pump is necessary since gravity fall is inadequate.) RECEIVED. JUN 8 i993 APT. RECEIVED JUN 8 1993 PLANNING DEPT. ADDRESS: c S.c/ LG�,,', 844• PLA LE DATE: / 7.$/ 93 RESIDENTIAL ZONING ANALYSIS Project Address: 8 So t"-14^ Place - Legal Description: Type of Project: j,i-}-w\ -{-c Ski\ AL Property Owner: 1uck¢v No. Units: I Applicant(s) : 1t&cL(.Q,✓ Designer: Sun loe,r3 jp.erS try\ Date of Plans: 5-12.0 /93 Analysis Prepared by: 142-_ **************************************** Zoning: R -I General Plan Designation: LD—Sico4n-hc`Q Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre Allowed (DU/AC): R-1 13 DU/AC 1 Dwelling Unit per Lot R-2 25 DU/AC 1 Unit per 1750 sq. ft. of Land R-3 33 DU/AC 1 Unit per 1320 sq. ft. of Land Lot Area: 4000 Proposed Density -Dwelling Units/Acres ,t4— Maximum Allowable Lot Coverage: 6570 Proposed Lot Coverage: Minimum Unit Size: 4 5 / a) 1 bedroom - 900 sq. ft. b) 2 bedroom - 1100 sq. ft. c) 3 bedroom - 1400 sq. ft. d) 4 bedroom - 1600 sq. ft. Proposed Units Size(s): &((3hs1j /3'f`t-# dd,fiah 9a// l Ti9Z .224J -;J Usable Open Space Required 3 FSDR►1-2fTI4 a) R-1 - 400 sq. ft., minimum dimension of 10' (ZOOF Dec* 75% ground - 25% balconies, open to the sky b) R-2 & R -2B - 200 sq. ft., minimum dimension of 7' c) R-3 - 200 sq. ft., minimum dimension of 7' d) R -P - 200 sq. ft., minimum dimension of 7' 1� f C Condominium developments requires 100 sq. ft. of additional private open space, minimum dimension of 7'. Each condominium development of five (5) units or more requires 100 sq. ft. of common open space per unit. Open Space per Unit: Required Proposed Private: Common: Total: ***************.********************** Maximum Allowable Height a) R-1 - 25 feet, maximum 2 stories b) R-2 & R -2B - 30 feet, maximum 2 stories c) R-3 - 35 feet d) R -P - 35 feet, maximum 3 stories Condominium developments located along walk streets shall not exceed the maximum height of 25 feet within the front half of the lot. Proposed Building Height: Z z" c — Note: Height shall be verified by the Building Department during Plan Check. ************************************* Building Setbacks Where garages or parking stalls front on a public street, the minimum setback shall be 17 feet provided roll -up doors are installed; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where standard doors are installed. Where garages or parking stalls front on an alley the setback shall be 3 feet, 9 feet , or 17 feet. Setbacks - continued Front: ‹:5-1Rear: Required Proposed /Z/7u Side: 5, S � Sf (e4(s ui. 5 S i se11Wj) ********************************************* Parking a) Two parking spaces per unit, minimum dimension of 8 1/2 feet wide by 20 feet deep -enclosed, 8 1/2 feet wide by 18 feet -open. Total Required: b) One guest space for each two units (round up; e.g. 3 unit site must provided 2 guest spaces) One guest space shall also be required for each on -street parking space eliminated because of new driveways or curb cuts. Total Required: Parking Proposed: l a) Spaces - e,>aSfirl� b) Guest Parkinga 5u4u.d 4im4 )‘.4 Required Turning Radius 023/ Proposed Turning Radius - ************************* ** **************.k*k* Required Sound Insulation Required: a) The minimum wall insulation rating between units shall be 52 STC. b) The minimum floor/ceiling rating between stacked units shall be 58 STC. Proposed Sound Insulation - Note: Sound Insulation requirement shall be verified by the Building Department during plan check. Storage Area Required per Units: a) 200 cubic feet of storage area per unit -)g - Storage Area Proposed per Unit - Location of Trash Facilities - tk) 4 - Staff Comments: est a Jfla eJ �. 7 ' ,-QJ _ l 7 :7 5 int o4 a/ 3 / ve 749.41 Si %\ncLcuLe_ t V 9-- I 1 • (o 10 S2l2 C &LI k S c • 1 (c13 Lc cam\ loe._.,\n,Y:d.. c) c.w a . v, .J.-1.3zcc.' ....t. LL' u l �ci 5 ,A -z.: « -k'..-..ki.lrl. 11.\.(0,,lt- o -:,c_( -t ) ( 6• c �. L- \A v10 _ s-� - k v1c-�,''cd o v,) ti\s,...,\r- o Yl s l -J C_,c�'h A —: l . v--- j \.] .' �-, ` V\ --c L, A t `'`J REVISED - January 1991 p/analysis ADDRESS: DATE: NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS WORKSHEET Fs -0 plctoz- 6/a3/g3 I) EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR AREAS a) livable: J 3 L/L{ m X r711- = G%q q - b) garage: 3(0 C ] X tee- ._ %`1�p c) decks: X = Existing Value = !Q(p/ /s'7 50% of Existing Value = II) PROPOSED PROJECT ADDED FLOOR AREAS a) ' livable: 9.1 yi x 74 =• 6,81.5"5F b) garage: \Q X = c) decks .5700J X 1130 _ 5(,,s -v REMODELED AREA a) livable: /17 0/2 X 7L/b- b) L// b) garage: X = c) decks: X = 2fc,4 TOTAL VALUE: 15', % G PERCENTAGE OF VALUE OF PROJECT TO EXISTING BUILDING: 17/ % • • .• C CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH //�� PROJECT ADDRESS 50 8�N G � 3 k (A. c100, Z Project Name (If applicable) LEGAL DESCRIPTION L—o J l) . P S M ' r -j F 1 O5 / ZONING APPLICANT INFORMATION: p / r v Name (s) r�► _ C - S e Phone I O 374 - al I dt- ?.• S`r N. �L {� , g , Com- 4 62-S' Mailing Address Applicant's Relationship to„Property 0 W YVt`2_ r.4-::„ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE PROJECT REQUEST Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) (3812) _ C.U.P. - Condo of Units (3812) C.U.P. Amendment/Amortization (3805) C.U.P. - Fences & Walls (3864) Environmental Staff Review (3803) Final Map (3810) General Plan Amendment/Zone Change (3811) Height Limit Exception (3898) _ Lot Line Adjustment (3884) x Nonconforming Remodel (3866) Total Fees ro_G $3() DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (attach additional ZI DATE J- 146-- 41 -5 Parking Plan (3857) Permitted Use Request (3885) Planning Commission Appeals (3888) Precise Development Plan (3867) Tentative Map - Subdivision/Lot Split (3809) Tentative/Final Map/C.U.P. Extension (3883) Text Amendment, Private (3886) Variance (3808) Voluntary Lot Merger (3887) 300' Radius Noticing - 1st Noticing (3868) 300' Radius Noticing - 2nd Noticing (3890) pages if necessary) tc:501-1 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - RECEIVED BY: DATE OF SUBMITTAL: MAY 2 0 1993 OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT* STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Los Angeles On Greg Tucker before me, S.S. Sheila R. Williamson of satisfactory evidence) to be the instrument authorized person(s), and acknowledged to me capacity(ies), and that or the ntityl upon behalf hand and pff'cia seal E �h�I�t$I 1iH l�nii 1 ii 41�i�h t11 111 nl11 1Iit •�.• �,, SHEILA R. WILLI AMSO NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNth. . J PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN E OFFICIAL SEAL LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Expires October 2, 1995 E *SigranWtigiiilitaa4Ibi{ittdi{Y46Iiii!ItiROPERTY OWNER, not owner in escrow. PLANNING DEPT. personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within that he/she/they executed the same is his/her/their by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the of which the person(s) acted, ee ted the instrument. Owner's Sig Ad ess Telephone C3 I p ) '� 7 r2 33 '66 67 F'u'LAF;0 ?0 L � � JDR St SONS C CiNSTRIJCr2 P. O. BOX 794 LAViiNtiALE , CA 9 02 6 0 State Lic. No. 53787? Proposal Satibrytitted To: fhf,, Name Gi•-eg and Betty -Tiwaker Street 850 ..,8th _Place 'City Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 State,Phone 9,14,etpaNtleoT 1,-92)8f. 293 Work To Se Performed At,: Street City. Data of Plans Architect We hereby propose to furnish the materiels and perform the labor rfiteessary for the eechPleffloo of • 1. Cut existirig driveway and garage slab to allow for iristallatiron or new posts. Excavate all neci-i-asary soil for feu:- coi-lcrrat.e mares. f . Build temporary shoring to support_ upper floor garra e'en or new headers to push back garage eleiaation . Remove as per plan 1„„iilo ceriter posts at end of girder . Iristall two headers at location specified on pians. Make all neciessary airterations to existing floor- system to allow for proper connection as per code .11 of old with new. Break away any and all necessary exterior and plaster around grage to allow for proper irtstallartion of new headers. Rerriove or re -routs all existing mechanical which that ir-rterfci-!res 'with the proper instal lation. of headers. Install posts with new headers at garage elevation over concrete pads ,•;;.';',',;!:i.'„f:tal."..;',.,,,... ''''':',:..-,...,. as,.;:„,..ii:per...:,......plarrii.,..:'."......Re7-plaster.:,,....interior.,,,a:and....":„'„exteriaire.':'„,,i0f,•,i.,,....,'"garragraias...,!,-rinictirriisiFry.,,,.,.......,..„,,,.,..::.,,,...,•••,,,,,,•iii..,:...,,,,,,r,,,,,,,,...,.,„:.,,,I,,,, • • a '''' - -.----'''''''''...1.2-erH,,•ir.a.,,,•••:,!,,,,,....arit.',•,,i,.,,,",,..'',.....,,::r1, :.,,:•duer...E.'.76.o.,,"removal, 2.....-, ..""....i,......,.':',.:'.....-..,.....•••'''',',...0,:,"';':.,2,•::i,,,,j..,ii--,.....'''.......,,••-.":".•,,,'.,....,,i,,..,::',....".•''''',,,,-.,'"''',.ri,..:...,::•••'•:,,•';.:•:::.':...,•i,•,',......:.1,,,'.....i.;.''',',...',..'.'i•-•':•.'''''.-:ii•i,'"...,''''I'''.'",ii,:.•:',,..,,•;,,,•,..,.,""Eii..,',..:,..,•••',...,•ii,:i.E,...i."..r..,,",,,:"'..','„i.,i'•:,-,'"..ir..."..,,..,'",,-„,',"-..,........,,....,',"....,.',',',,.,.'",,•••••'ir,•:',..'i:',,-":",•,,,-......,•,:,,",!,:,:r-„,,•:2,r:-..'!,..'.7.-..i,'„2„..E.,...;•„,"..":',''r"......i,i,"!:,,,H,',i.....i,,i,,,..,'..r,'",•,,,',..,',•:',•,':•,.1,g'••:.2,',......,,I. 6. '-'':'.1.:,:i:''':',''',',',.•'' •:'"'',.'" .............................,, :•:,...F!Oirrinr.and',........re-9.„ re-••,',Tetg-rae',.:aall,i,•,::.,,,,',..,..,::.,i,:,..rr,::,ii,,•:,,,.1„.'„ii,:,::::1, ll'i•riii'•i'''''''','');•':'''-';';'i'•'.;;' ..,..,,,,,i,:r •••• •••-•-•,- • .. ...• i necessary 'r areas ','..,'1 n,.. garage .....where.',,,,'•': concrete removal hasi,'"'',..'',•,...i,••• occurred":•••r::,,afroir:',,--.."the"i'::,..,-i:,!,.,-,'".t....:,,'-',,',':•:::.:•,,..:::.96,,i.,,':,,iiii 1••,,,J.,,,,,,,,:,-,,..:,,,',,,,,',.: .,..,,a new agrnstal let:ion .. of •-•'" load..bea:Cina":",•-i9osts ie.,- Pour....-:,-...ne14....concretea. to match i:......".r.,.......,•',..,',....".,"....r,irr,':',,'",'....i'l • •.• . • •-•-• - . ' •,. - ....... ' ' • ' • •• • ,. •-•,', . • -...,..„--- . ••••••• ....„,...i..,-..........„,•:-....,.....,,.....ri.,',,,,,..,,',i,,,,,,rii. j... .. ... . . .. . . .. . . . . . .... -...... . existing .• grade, -................,:"........W..... • . -, e.,.a • " ••••••••2•-••••:-........,'":...,.."••••-••••-••',..---e-.................-.....".....r..,,-..,......W',":,:"...,......--..".... ' ....."..............--aan-ii....r -... w •-• .." 1, ,','•,:::...,',A:..1f'..',."-.rnaterist..g.,. guaraf)teed to • be i,.ls • suslcified,l and tfie ''above'.."-..work....to .. beh oftif.tcmh7ieff.....lf ff' actocfrdap•-ice• ••witi-th Off': l.(Offaerlle;:lfhlefTlffilhplff.k,"lll Illftlflf specifications •.'submittedhfor• •abicfve.. work and co rTI p 1 E t- ec't..• tri ..a ....s Li b s t a rk t. i'.-61, ...... \i'\''o l''.k n'l a n i i kE-,.,...." in a •r''', r'. e f'.....,......fti ',' :'.'" t',1.7).c:".".'.....s.'"..."...'',..-",'""...'.)::','..f..".'..1...'.."'''''...''..1. • • • -....... • . . ,--1,.),!,,, . ('',"1:". ••••• -............ ..... ..... .. .. . ''.1..." 1"...'".."'...."' i.'"" with payments to be made as follows: 1 Ail, ata:,ori oit;pr fc.or,.-:, aLrJve. 6pecific&Jr„,.$ irivc..dv‘og. e.,0_,T .1.cov-,:-2•, v a exr,c.,:itbd only uDo-, v„,,t,ten 0,c,,..,,,, end wr,1 becm, ext ohFP-gt, Ove, and abovb the f3t,i1et,-,.. A:i v,:;:-,,:emenzs c..,Dn'ongenz upo,: 5- ,-cloe,,,,,: r deroy:, be.y.,p1,... oJ c„c.-t-o, Owner t car'ry tcg,-kado and other. recessa,--,:, risa-,SnoE up.:,' a'..,,?, E' Wt:),.k WO: i, - 0 rnpe:ns,,itAc.-4n and PL,UIC Lh,ky 1:15,1'WC,,, 07i at,x),,,E. wori, tc: bf. taken c.t by vv,t1.-on I ' I - A - v "1- ~, .•- , + ~,,,, , m ^, • , 'V TOPS -FORM 3E150 OR,,IGINAL JDR & SONS P posai Submitted To: Name Greg, and. Betty Tucker. Street City Stare Phone No. , ,,..-. •.. ... ,.,,,,, . , , l'iliti-Oate,,,,.l.,tj.,...,..a.ilt,,,,'....j...,'...j.: J.i. •i -,1"f''' lll' J.:. '• ' • : _ . ---- Sheet- Np.......,....,:,,,,::-Jx::: . . ..' .."......... b , ' • ...., . —...: ,.... • ,.' ..--.. -'' ' ' :.• — ,..... ,. ,, Wark To aa Performed At: Architect hereby propose to furnsh the ma els and perform the labor necessary for the completion of 7. Remove existing wailingarage to. allow for parking of. automobiles• . -- Re-route new electrical runs for that whichis in existing wall. Terminate and re-route heating duct located within the wall. Re -patch both w%'„is and existing ceiling in this area. Remove carpeting, finish - door, trim and and all items inhibiting the space, to be used for parking. 8. Move existing storage area over along wall five feet to accommodate for. j clearance - • Re -plaster exterior garage elevation to match existing texture coat and color. Pe -paint a:a necessary items, inside_and. around garage. • Re -frame garage dor opening to accommodate dauble,car garage door sectional style. Also to include automatic garage'door opener,- . All interior painting of garage, walls,and trim. All necessary painting to exterior trim and garage door. 12 Properly remove and dispose of all debris produced from above stated., ' work to approved disposal sites. , -x 13. Contractor will pravide all necessary'permits to perform above stated 14., Price:to include necessary permits -,profit and overhead and items,±elated,j AH .,' material glierenteed to be ps specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for abo,ea work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of -,,.09 Thirty -Two Thousand Five Hundred Forty Five x Dollars ($32,545- payments to be merle as follows: 4ny alteration f?r eeviation from above specifications involving extra oasts, will be executed anti/ upon written orders, and win bocorne ar extra charge over and above tho estimate Ail agreements contingent open strikes, accickints r elays heyand our control. Owner to carry': tiro, tornado and other neCE.AiSaiN insurance upon above work, Work., m6r;,,,i Compensation and Pobliti, t.intality lnsorancto on above work to be , Note:7-This prop sal may be withdrawn by u .." ....'ACfCEPTANCEtF POPOS: . oqd conditions are-satia•factor.y end are hereby acceptad.:You ere at.4thorized to do .4lie .yvork.as.jsfiecit;ed: Elate Signature ,... ;JTHO,NU.SA P ESTIMATE FOR: .Greg and -Bette Tucker 850 8th Place Hermosa Beach,- CA 90254 WORK DESCRIPTION: l; Remove Garage Doors 2 Remove 200 Sq. Ft. of Garage Slab Floo Shore -- p Structure.` of Related Areas, Remove 3 Existing Footzngs in 6 Locations in Order Under Pen With New Concrete Pads , Pour New Concrete Pads Pour New Garage Slab and Install 6 New ', St ee1.' Co1.umns a n Order to Support 3 Horizontal St eel ;Beams Replace ali'Fire Rated Dry wal.l in Related Areas Replace all Exterior Stucco in Related Areas, Install. New Garage Doors and Paint Affected Areas TOTAL COST FOR ABOVE WORK: $25,800.00 Tracy E P.O. BOX 10103 TORRANCE, CA, 90505 PHONE 310 547-2506 Juan And Delores Rodriquez 925 8 Th P1 Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1055 Valley Dr Civic Center Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 We own a house up the street from Tuckers. They have shc,wn us their plans and explained what they wish to do. I have no objection to them being allowed to build with only a two car garage and no parking spaces in front. They have a limited budget and making such a big change may mean they can not afford the remodel Juan And Delores Rodriguez Michael & Joy Rodriguez 911 Eighth Place Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 City Council City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 We live next to the Tuckers. We have reviewed their plans. We understand that they are asking to have only two garage spaces rather than the two plus two required under the new laws. We thing they should be allowed to continue as they may not he able to complete the remodel if this rule is imposed. Michael Rodrigue Derek and Jean Mc Greevy 840 8th. Pl. Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 Hermosa Beach Council 1015 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 We like the Tuckers proposed plans and think you should allow them to build as is. Derek Mc Greevy Jean Mc Greevy Kim and Bill 901 8 th. Place Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 City Hall Hermosa Beach Subject 850 8 th Place The Tuckers should be allowed to build their plans • Kim and Bill 901 8 th. Place Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 City Hall Hermosa Beach Subject 850 8 th Place The Tuckers should be allowed to build their plans 111 _ "r'd_ ' i I 1;-r .• a5;r: all V.f., .17c.sts� ....d.,,,+ • 0254. e:it Yat , .t, ty-Qun y�e ;live ` ,11.ext' r o -,the ' Vuckers.' rWe''''nave ,rev:iewea 'their p ans. We ;understand ;that :'•they '.are'asking - to have only two cr race spaces 'rather 'than''`the ``two , plus two ' required under talc: mr.v. laws. We " *'.thinricthey,,should be allowed .'to continue as they m,._ rc -. be able complete` 'the '.remodel if this rule is i.mpascd . ichele ;:Unger Bob Salim 909 8th.. St Hermosa Beach C 90254 City Council City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 Dear City Council Have no objection to the Tuckers project being built as proposed andenco rage you to approve it. ' ob Salim A Paul Vogel 653'° Fourth.,, St . Hermosa Beach. Ca. 9025.4 City Council CityAof'•Hermosa Beach'" -Civic-,Center Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 I own . a house, next ' .to ,the, Tuckers. They,, haye „shown'i. me.' their plans' and ;,explained what they- wish to" 'do: I have no objection= to •them• being allowed to build with •only a two' car garage and no parking spaces -in' front.., _'Tley: have a limited' budget and maki_ng such' a big change may mean they •can, not .afford the 'remodel . , 1, Paul Vogel 1 . r. • At oz/z- •or a I of '^ Napo <Oj-f l ie • 7-4. C 4 ' IST V\. orifi -l4 , LZLSU -liD Txc�ix�c„ C+'-cri0� -4:1 Lx11 r .a- ._ i.}:..eIdG-41.11:u1 .011-••• P•. 0610 CG-- ' A' C7.4I YrIM I xna .asKNW 110 1•04.../ T TMs VW/ T.'L t•+= row EGOS wSZr LUIS, iYJ a..'i'+tr 1f.1.:.14VI0 XII 117/ it O0I1VQ ZIYU ,T .-C. X$ r . 1 7.M C 0.100 MW. MCS Orof 1C JOLT 14 O. lY,:ciO OO'r..li TM. all 00 =OS Mi. JD SLY 0Y il•M •P/CICS 1/C•d1K 1Ki1 OIJ./S .CII Wit 1 • JolOH 1 - xov 'Clad w x al 0 wx 0, Qa+G $ • 70 O • s-fN1 OI mai. On . • lVY1:01f1 s Ars V 7 O.: •. •1 •C Ma' C. 'J -a i'fr , `Oct lld • 'JDO.111 'CII/ M VC .72 O+. la•6' OK QIVC L G �� 7O .• • f7M1 O1 MW coo -IAN.• 'M. m. M �•/ V • •w • ¢ • -Vel .0 'u• •. iHlS..i$ TT�FThl315 �r•....v w .s �. ...,..+r pcjy, 11-20,7,it e • r R -rtes an:, :IV I F 5r1151,1- tD" �� f •ioN • �5�sa j a 0011- 9. O lZl» 9-7t rt 0.125 'lt+ Sri ;h 1 m-11 v-151 tib 2nouej' ,.�ll� 1-e6.e�i A�nDU�� .1.100J 1,11V •JAttN rN Srng a7-93 TO: 1 „ FROM: Michael Schubach, Plann ector SUBJECT: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Request from South Bay Cycles to amend a required condition for a property line wall and landscaping without paying C.U.P. amendment fees DATE: July 20, 1993 Recommendation Receive and file. Alternative Direct staff to withhold any enforcement action until the study to reduce C.U.P. amendment fees is completed. Background At their meeting of July 6, 1993, the Planning Commission advised the applicant that they did not have the authority to waive the fees. Analysis The required fees for C.U.P. amendments are necessary to cover the City's cost to process an amendment request. Also, a noticing fee is required to cover the cost of the required public notice. The total fee for this request would be $451 ($347 for the C.U.P. amendment, and only $104 for 2nd time noticing since the original noticing was within the last 6 months). The Council will also be considering lowering the C.U.P. amendment fee (tentatively scheduled for the next meeting). The subject condition to require a property line wall and a 5 -foot wide landscaped strip along a commercial residential boundary is a standard condition imposed on C.U.P.'s to buffer the residential uses, and is a requirement of the zoning code for any new development. For further analysis, please refer to the attached staff memo to the Planning Commission. Receiving and filing this request will confirm the Planning Commission's action to advise the applicant that modification or elimination of conditions of approval requires following proper noticing and hearing procedures, which includes the submittal of fees. ATTACHMENTS p/memo6 - 1 - bTAFF ITEMS: 13.a Memorandum and correspondence regarding a request for fee waiver of a Conditional Use Permit amendment at 828 Pacific Coast Highway, South Bay Cycles. Mr. Schubach stated waiving of the fee was not within the Commission's purview, but input could be provided relating to landscaping waiver and modifications for the retaining wall. He stated the. correspondents wished a landscaping and wall requirement waiver and relief from paying the amendment fee. The neighbors requested that no fence or landscaping be required because their meter and landscaping are located in that area. The applicant has the ability to request the City Council waive the fee. Comm. Suard suggested the Conditions be waived; if and when they become an issue, they be addressed at that time. Mr. Schubach stated the Commission could not waive the fee and effort is to be made to work closely with the neighbor toward an amenable gas meter access arrangement. Action would require a public hearing; Chmn. Di Monda invited testimony. Jack Wood, 200 Pier Avenue felt a third alternative was available: pay the fee and request the condition be removed. He stated the appeal was not made by the C.U.P. proponent, but by the neighbor, who wished nothing be planted or constructed between the properties. He stated application to waive the conditions and fee was made, feeling the fee should not be paid by tlie applicant since the neighbor had initiated the action. - Z- P.C. Minutes 7-6-93 The Commission suggested the applicant discuss this item with Mr. Schubach to discuss possible solutions and try to obtain a waiver from the City Council. Chmn. Di Monda stated this item would be forwarded to the City Council. RECEIVE AND FILE. 13.b. Me orandum and correspondence regarding a request for modification to demolif . n plan . nonconforming remodel at 1616 Manhattan Avenue. Mr. Schubach expl . ' ed the history of this request, including addressing severe damage w ' h had not been recognized prior o commencing the remodel which had been removed without p - or approval. The applicants had excee a ed the allowances in terms of demolition and were now look' ' g to alternatives to allow construction to co inue. Mr. Schubach explained the nonconformities a • available options, noting the problem probably •riginated due to the age of the building and ext- for stucco. Staff felt their was discretion available • e to the minor modification proposed. e Commission could determine whether the intent and p 6 pose of Code Section 13.3.a had been ' et. Chmn. Di Monda read Section 13.3.a into the record, statin: e did not understand why this i -m had been presented to the Commission and recommending this it- s be referred back to Staff. Chmn. Di Monda invited testimony. Tim Meenan, 1616 Manhattan Avenue, explain brother, John Meenan, and the problems they had en for the demolition and the additional rental expense period. Mr. Meenan explained the plans were not the steps that had been taken from initial co damage. He felt fairness should be a part o the construction and replacement of pree Mr. Meenan explained ample on-site d the Chmn. Di Monda agreed fairnes scope than simply the one prop should be made could be d' previously displayed its ordinance should be c felt the request sho Commission did ing c pt through he consideration, ting buildings should rking was available on the oject history 'and the plans of he and his tered to date. He explained the safety reasons ed by John Meenan during this construction nged, other than demolition. He explained discovery of dry rot and other building noting his neighbors did not object to allowed, in this particular instance. operty. was necessary, but that the fairness a rty. He stated determination as to whether cussed by the applicant with Staff. Comm. Su ish to work with people who had problems such a nged to accommodate this type of situation and close pote d be approved, subject to the City Attorney's opinion and d ave the authority to approve the request, to which Comm. Oakes ag d rules must include a large application for Variance d felt the Council had this, suggesting the ialloopholes. He ermination the ed. Comm. M, s discussed with Messrs. Tim Meenan, John Meenan and Bruce Tuttle, project co tractor, the circumstances and actions taken at the time the interior damage was discovered. Bruce states • afety factors'and common sense had determined the actions taken, including notification of project arch ect on tl% second day after the discoveries. He recommended a red stamp procedure be implemented address this unique type of situation. P.C. Minutes 7-6-93 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Ken Robertson, Associate Planne SUBJECT: Letter from Triad Design, re: South Bay Cycle C.U.P. Requirement For a Property Line Wall and Landscaping DATE: June 28, 1993 Recommendation Advise the applicant that the Commission would be willing to consider this request to eliminate or modify the requirement, but that appropriate fees and proper procedures must be followed to amend conditions of a C.U.P. Analysis The attached letter is a request to waive conditions Nos. 5, 8b, and 10a, of South Bay Cycles C.U.P. which require a 6' high property line wall and landscaping along the east property line. The letter also requests that the application fee be waived for the request. Also attached is a letter from the adjacent property owner to the east who initiated this request, as she does not wish to see the wall and landscaping installed. The wall and landscaping were required on this project based on the requirements contained in the zoning ordinance for commercial properties which abut residential properties. Since this was an existing building and commercial site, this requirement did not necessarily have to be imposed. However, the Planning Commission, based on the recommendation of staff, was certainly correct to impose this requirement because of the intensification of use from retail to motorcycle sales and service. Final approved plans correctly show the required landscaping and wall (excerpts attached). Since this requested amendment goes far beyond a minor modification, and would be inconsistent with the adopted C.U.P. conditions, an amendment with proper public noticing is necessary. There is no provision in the Municipal Code to allow fee waivers for such an amendment, and if the fee was waived, the. City would have to absorb the cost of noticing. While there may be some merit to this request because of the neighbors concerns, it should be noted that the wall and landscaping would provide aesthetic relief, and perhaps some noise mitigation for other nearby residents and the general public. As such, the proper procedure would be to require the fee, and to publicly notice the request, before making any decision to eliminate or modify the conditions of the C.U.P. Some possible modifications that could then be considered: Require only the landscaping, and refinishing of the existing retaining wall Require only a smaller wall or fence to cap the existing retaining wall Establish a time period for wall improvem- is ichelShubach, Planning Director ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter from Triad Design 2.: Letter from JoAnne Hall 3.' Excerpts from approved plans 4. l.. Photographs 5., P.C. Resolution 92-71 completion of the landscaping and TRIAD DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 Pier A'enue, Suite 38 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Accident Analysis ALTA Surveys Assessment Engineering Budget Analysis Building A peals Building Design Building Plans Building Inspections CC&R s Coastal Permits Conditional Use Permits Condominium Budgets Condominium Conversions Condominium Plans Construction Inspection Construction Staking Contract Administration Damage Assessment Drainage Plans D.R.E. Processing Ana'sis Earthquake Engineering Electnc Service Plans Energy Calculations Erosion Plans Estimating Expert Witness Feasibility Studies Fire Damage Appraisal Flood Analysis Forensic En neering Foundation Inspections Gas Plans Grading Plans Hydrology Studies Industrial Tank Design Land Planning Plan Legal Descriptions Legal Determinations Management Documents Mapping Noticing Parcel Maps ParkingPlans Pinks Whites Presentations Radius Maps Remodel Plans Reserve Account Analysis Seismic Rehabilitation Sewer Plan ShoringDesign Solar eports Solar System Design Sjoecial Use Permits Stone Drain Plans Street Lighting Plans Street Plans Street Tree Plans Structural A praisals Structural Desi Structural Drag Supervision Surveys Tract Maps Utilities Plans Utility Easements Variances Water Plans Working Drawings Zone Changes Planning Commission City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 1739.3:W*49 (310) 376-8849 RECEIVED JUN 1 6 1993 PLANNING DEPT. Re: 828 Pacific Coast Highway South Bay Cycles 923259 We have completed the work for the C.U.P. except for the block wall, trees and landscaping along the Eighth Place rear yard. We have not completed it because the lady to our rear requested that we not complete the work. She still opposes the fence and trees as she wishes no changes, access to her sideyard from our lot, is afraid the utility company will ask her to move her meter and she has some large bushes that will be damaged if we construct. She is very strongly opposed to the work. She will also loose some view and light and air if we construct. It does not seem in anyones best interest to force this work on people who do not wish it. As we understand the C.U.P. concept it is to help business be "good neighbors" In this case a good neighbor should respect the wishes of the others. If it would help we could agree to a condition to build in the future if a new owner to the rear wished us to. Please consider this a request to waive the wall, tree and landscape conditions. We also ask for fee waiver as we are not asking for our own benefit but that of a neighbor. Wo•d or the Company attachment 'MA JUN -15-1993 15:19 FP( SOUTH BAY CYCLES Jo Anne Hall 830 8 th. Place Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 June 10, 1993 Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach Ca. 90254 TO 993189551 P.01 RECEIVED JUN 1 6 1993 PLANNING DEPT. Re: 828 Pacific Coast Highway, South Bay Cycles, 923259 At the Planning Commission hearing I objected to the condition that South Bay Cycles erect a concrete block wall and install trees along`the commonproperty line we share. Now that operation of the business has begun I object more strongly. The wall and trees have not yet been installed.. I asked that they not be constructed and have .requested South Bay Cycles appeal to you to waive the yondition. I much prefer the open yard area to a fence and trees. I need access to that side of my property. Part of which I can only get to from South Bay Cycles' yard. I wish to maintain the light and ventilation that is now there rather than be blocked by the wall and trees. The business has been open a while and I find no ii] effects from the wall and trees not being there. This letter is being sent of my own free will. South Bay Cycles is helping me but this is my request. They have been good neighbors this far and I expect them to be in the future. Since this is my request I ask the you waive the fee South Bay Cycles may be requested to pay for this appeal. I can not afford to pay $700 and it is not fair to ask them to pay for helping a neighbor get something they do not want removed from a city requirement. Jo Anne Hall JUN 15 '93 14:27 7 TOTAL P.01 213 798 1571 PAGE.001 84 cKGROUND MATER/AL r-- i- -6:. :42,_n 'G .7-rf Atm ti? .-t GB I N : ,& LL - P t= t N taiH, • lt1 LL; !ter rJ .ATC-41 3 I ,, ri • ----1 ' LOT'l 8 ritz,AT No7 8386 • N() RIP4T TUt4r4 01644 • • -4 '.MA4P•t...0YGE� J .#<.trl ._2F-3 �. -r j :>t C_ ' < ,J ►rite. S� L,jl.. . 1 put LE:. t ytew c475cL,✓4vI' c..iz- �+"►''s•I 1.9e_�,, 9e_ ('Y"�` tcZ G� �J 4 IV 0 • a DDn.iRr.T ANA( YIS: { U. • 2 pmt G •P PT: :'AreVP. 1 N£ ta.. ,.`Rc 4 . ADJe c iJ {till, Ftwcr Tz-TY. og. WATER 11 MEP. I1,111el ft1(. P lziy, �U t L:P ouNp aft -L �:. :,1bt1KCi tot . :1:t fl -r2 ItG -'- •- A_`�Epl. OFz civeN 1 NG .VO MAT •..:.. AGZJOIN t Oar PtzDt Et z. Y:,644 MAV t Etta}}: PEi�IM 5-0" 9 # 3 '0 azo ,. Is -• IS 3L0 2-► 4. ..::. • 41v .....�� t Etta}}: PEi�IM ADDRESS: C C 6Lb ?.C. Q . / DATE: �O In /33 view Mori 5. Ett (C.YC,LE5 PAR -K-1 °Cr (AT 1�1 �ik1 W v.ST 1=R -0M NSA 6-0-,o R-5 5 D �c RESOLUTION P.C. 92-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW RETAIL SALES OF MOTORCYCLES, MOTORCYCLE PARTS AND ACCESSORIES, AND MOTORCYCLE REPAIR AT 828 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 3 AND 8, TRACT NO. 8386, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on December 1, 1992, and January 5, 1993, to receive oral and written testimony regarding the Conditional Use Permit request and made the following findings: A. The project is consistent with the general plan; B. The site is zoned C-3 and is suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed use; C. The development, as conditioned below, will pose no threat to the public safety and welfare; D. Design of the proposed project is compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City's General Plan and with the requirements of the C-3 zone; E. An environmental assessment has been conducted, and the proposed project, with the incorporation of mitigating • conditions below, will cause a less than significant environmental impact. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit at 828 Pacific Coast Highway, and adopts an Environmental Negative Declaration, subject to the following conditions: SECTION I Specific Conditions of Approval: 1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with submitted plans. Any minor modification shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 10:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. on Monday through Saturday and from 10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. on Sundays, except that repairs shall be strictly prohibited on Sundays. 3. Repair, service, and maintenance of motorcycles shall be for minor repairs only. For the purposes of this conditional use permit, minor repairs consist of the removal and/or installation of parts and accessories sold at this location and shall not include repair or service associated with the moving parts of the vehicle such as the engine, the wheels, lubrication systems or exhaust systems. Minor repair activities shall be conducted indoors with the doors closed. 4. The subject lots to be developed shall be merged together, pursuant to Section 29.5-29, prior to the issuance of building permits A six-foot high decorative block wall, with a finish to match the building, shall be provided along the entire length of the easterly property line with the finished type of wall material to be approved by the Planning Director. The applicant shall work with the neighbor at 830 8th place in regards to the design of the wall to ensure that access to the gas meters, currently located at the side of the house, is not obstructed. 6. A "no right turn" sign shall be posted at the driveway exit. 7. All parking spaces shall be properly striped with appropriate signs posted indicating that the spaces are for employees and customers of South Bay Cycles only. a. Vehicles or parts for sale shall not be parked or located in the required parking area or on the public sidewalk. b. All parking areas shall be maintained free and clear of unregistered and derelict vehicles or parts at all times. c. A handicapped parking space shall be provided 8. Three (3) copies of a revised landscaping plan indicating size, type, and quantity of plant materials _(, ncl siding trunk diamete .__at_..planting time) shall be submitted to the Planning "'Director for re-liffEr approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. a. An automatic landscape irrigation system shall be provided, and shall be shown on plans. b.\The type of trees provided along the length of the east property line shall be appropriate for buffering purposes and shall be a minimum 24" box size. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Three copies of detailed plans for signage shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of permits and shall comply with the following: a. The plans shall be consistent with the plan for signs included on the submitted plans. b. Any minor modification of the sign plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director, while significant changes require approval by the Planning Commission. 10. Final building plans/construction drawings including site, elevation, floor plan, sections, details, landscaping and irrigation, submitted for building permit issuance shall be reviewed for consistency with the plans approved by the Planning Commission, and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of any Building Permit, and shall comply with the following: ,- "�-___ a.'i,A landspaped s--- tri shall be provided; along the east ,properfy line with a minimu width o five (5) feet (measured from the prop t ine to the obtside_sfcur ), in conjunctin with a 6 -foot high decorative block wal-r as required by condition #5. The proposed parking space for employee parking only, located behind the roll -up door shall be eliminated. A handicap parking space shall be indicated with appropriate dimensions and loading and unloading area. 11. Motorcycles to be serviced shall enter the building through the rear door, utilizing the proposed lift to lower the motorcycles into the repair area, as described and depicted on the submitted plans. • 12. Motorcycle engines shall be turned off immediately upon parking, any further maneuvering of the motorcycle from the parking lot to the service area shall be conducted by walking the motorcycle with the engine turned -off. a. Signage shall be provided in a conspicuous location, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director, at the driveway entrance to notify customers that engines shall be turned off immediately. 13. Seating for congregations of individuals for the purpose of eating, drinking, or extended conversation is prohibited. Snacks and/or beverages shall not be sold or distributed freely from premises and only beverages may be offered on a complementary basis to customers. a. Advertising the availability of snacks or beverages is prohibited 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 . 23 24 25 26 27 28 14. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists whether due to noise, caused by customers, or loitering, and may require the presence of a police approved security personnel, to be paid for by the applicant/owner. Upon making this determination the police chief shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which shall automatically trigger review of this conditional use permit. a. The applicant/owner shall provide a security performance bond, at an amount determined by the Police Chief, to cover any excess cost to the City of excessive police service necessary to control noise or loitering problems on, or adjacent to, the establishment. 15. The attic proposed to be added to the interior of the building shall be for storage purposes only and shall never be converted to additional floor area. 16. Test driving of vehicles shall be prohibited. Revving or testing of engines on the premises, or on the public sidewalk or parking areas in front of the business shall be prohibited. A sign shall be posted in a conspicuous location tothat patrons be considerate of the neighbors. SECTION II General Conditions of Approval: 1. The project and the operation shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 2. Disposal of hazardous waste material shall be in accordance with local, state, and federal laws, but in no event shall such waste material be allowed to drain into the City storm drain system. 3. There shall be no bells, buzzers, or similar apparatus audible outdoors. Outside speakers for any purpose shall be prohibited. 4. All motorcycle service shall be conducted inside the building with the doors closed. Outdoor work on vehicles is prohibited. 5. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's noise ordinance, Article 19.5 of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, and shall not create a nuisance to the surrounding residences and commercial establishments. Creating loud or obnoxious noise shall be prohibited. a. Violation of the noise ordinance or related State laws shall be grounds for revocation of the conditional use permit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 b. A sign shall be posted in a conspicuous location to request patrons to use baffle equipment, and to note that free installation of baffles is available upon request. c. No modifications to mufflers shall be made by the shop which increase noise. 6. The exterior of the premises including the parking areas shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. 7. All exterior lights shall be located and oriented in a manner to insure that neighboring residential property and public right-of-way shall not be adversely affected. 8. Storage of trucks, tractors, trailers, RV's or other similar vehicles in the parking area or other locations on the premises shall be prohibited. 9. The public right-of-way shall not be used for the parking or storing of vehicles that are intended for sale, detailing, or other purposes. Unloading of vehicles shall be prohibited on public streets. 10. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department as contained in the attached memorandum dated August 10, 1992. 11. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Department as contained in their notes dated August 5, 1992. .SECTION III 1. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Department of Planning their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. 2. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 3. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if any of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. 4. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation ,shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the, permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. 5. The Conditional Use Permit shall automatically expire within one (1) year of the date of approval of said entitlements unless permittee and/or owner(s) have commenced construction of the project, unless an extension to said time period has been granted by the Planning Commission. SECTION IV The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. VOTE: AYES: Comms. DiMonda, Oakes, Chmn. Merl NOES: Comm. Marks, Suard ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 92-71 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of January 5, 1993. ), - -7 .7 Rod Merl, Chalirman Michael Schubach, Secretary /9 -?3 Date p/pers828 ( CUP 92-15 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MOTORCYCLE SALES, REPAIRS, PARTS AND ACCESSORIES,. AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 828 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SOUTH BAY CYCLES (continued from December 1, 1992 meeting). Recommended Action: To approve said Conditional UsePermitand adopt the Environmental Negative Declaration. Secretary Schubach stated Staff recommended approval subject to conditions. The Traffic Engineer had noted this corner was an impacted one as far as accidents, as well as the corners to the north and south. A study is being conducted by the Public Works Dept. -regarding this matter, with proposals to reduce accidents, including installation of "no left turn signs", will be presented within the future. Mr. Schubach stated Staff had reviewed the CUP to assure that all necessary conditions were included. He noted that the proposed shelf or storage area would not be•usable as floor area and did not Impact parking requirements. Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Merl at 9:55 p.m. Jack Wood, 200 Pier Ave., Ste. 38, applicant's representative, stated the old and new conditions reflected redundancies; requesting that the applicant be allowed to simply conform to the Uniform Building Code and the Sign Ordinance. As they were changed, the applicant would 'change to assure his compli- ance. He stated some of the conditions did not seem to be reasonable ones. He objected to Condition #12, noted the requirement for the applicant to "police" his customers. He suggested the condition state, "...conform to the Noise Ordinance and parties are not to be held in the parking lot which would disturb the neighbors." Condition #14 would effect the style of marketing the applicant wished. Mr. Wood described the method and type -of items which would be displayed. He felt this item was under the jurisdiction of the Building Dept. and requested this condition be removed. Responding to Comm. Oakes question, Mr. Wood described .the display window area and the access -to -that area. Comm. Marks and Mr. Wood discussed the exact specifics of that area. • Keith Edwards stated the proposed new location was within a crowded area and objected to South Bay Cycles relocating to that location, as the noise levels and traffic congestion would be increased. He felt the business could be located elsewhere with no impact upon its business and suggested the business relocate to Aviation Blvd., He stated the residents have an investment in their ,properties and this type of business would create animosity among the neighborhood. John Buffett, 9th Street, a 20 year resident, stated he had not heard any additional noise since the business had begun. 10 P.C. Minutes 1-5-93 —1 7 If this shop were not there, he would have to go to Harbor City. He stated the business was clean and well run, no complaints regarding noise had been received. He supported the application, stating the owner was simply trying to relocate in order to save money. John Burnacki, 805 Bard St., presented a petition to the Commission which he said should give the Commission a message, commented upon the letters he had previously written on this subject, objected to the relocation to the new site, requested the Commission consider the suitability of the new location. He stated calling the police regarding noise levels was ineffective due to the time lag in response. He questioned the method in which the City addressed the noise problems and the noise measurements obtain from the noise survey. Beverly Bordado, 940 8th Place, discussed her concerns regarding vehicles turning left and being allowed to park in the back of the parking lot, as well as the necessity to use "wreckers". She also questioned the differences between the previous Condition #16 and current #3, feeling the noise level will now be increased. She addressed her concerns regarding the safety issues, stating additional accidents have involved both bicycles and cars. She challenged the conclusions reached from review of the Traffic Study, stating more accidents happened in this area than most others. She requested the Commission consider the neighborhood and not make any decision until it received- the new study results. Responding to Comm. Suard's question, Mr. Bordado stated she had no recommendation as to the type of business which would decrease the traffic problems. Michael Larkin, 902 8th Place, supported local businesses and the tax dollars paid by them to the area. He stated he welcomed this business to the area, noting motorcycles are expensive and most economically appealing to him. He felt the community needed this business and this would be a good use of this site. Davy Rhymer, 802 Monterey Ave., stated he was a "bike" rider, felt previous testimony had been a little hysterical. He stated he fully supported the business and its relocation to the new site, noting it was not a high volume business, while being a high dollar per visit business, and should be given the chance to operate. Cindy Di Nunio, 62 8th Street, noted there could be two motorcycle shops if this CUP were approved, felt this relocation would impact the noise and congestion on her street and suggested that the decision await completion of the Traffic Study and its evaluation. Jim Danielson, 723 8th Place, noted the tremendous parking problems and expressed concern regarding the density of 11 - P.C. Minutes 1-5-93 � C traffic and noise levels which have increased 10 -fold during his residency, and its possible continued increase. He stated parking enforcement has not been good, the red parking strips had been diminished. Marianne Wright, 731 8th Street, stated she had two letters and was not notified within the 10 -day period. She objected that the CUP stayed at 640 Pacific Coast Highway, which allow another motorcycle shop. She said when there was noise, she called the Police Dept. and let them listen to the sounds of motorcycles, dogs and babies over the telephone. She stated the previous stationery store was a good business and was very busy. She confirmed that many accidents did occur on the corner of 8th Street and Pacific Coast Highway. She stated she liked to shop in the City and would like a business on that site. Jean McGreevy,840 8th Place, stated the residential streets were used by motorcycles. Nicholas Salaso, resident of Redondo Beach, supported the relocation, stated he saw no harm in his business being moved to another location since it is already in the town. He stated motorcycles will be ridden on the streets whether the business is there or not. Joanne Hall, 830 8th Place, expressed concern that a six -feet wall would be built along the edge of the property line which would abut her retaining wall. She would then be unable to get to the side of her house, where her gas meters •are located. Jack Wood stated 'the applicant would work with Ms. Hall make sure that the meter was accessible, or that it were moved. Mr. Schubach stated the wall was a zoning requirement, but adjustments could be made. Mr. Wood indicated modifications could be made. Curt Hayden, Rancho Palos Verdes, a motorcycle rider for 20 years, noted his motorcycle cost $20,000, his neighbors did not complain about noise, he respected his neighbors and supported the request. He noted the proposed business had an average customer base of 5-10 customers per day and felt the business would have a minimum amount of impact upon the area. Jack Wood rebutted the applicant did not have control over the previous use of the property, wished to purchase the subject property as an business -economics decision. He did not feel that the previous location would be filled by another motor- cycle shop. He stated the neighbors seemed to fell they had control of what went on on Pacific Coast Highway. He stated the business has operated for more than two years, with the condition of review at six -months being waived, the business 12 P.C. Minutes 1-5-93 teaches his customers good biking manners. Mr. Wood asked for the Commission's consideration on the Conditions that were redundant, regarding handicapped and signage requirements, with the applicant agreeing to the other conditions. Comm. Wood and Mr. Wood discussed the required parking spaces for a new versus an existing building site. Mr. Schubach noted that an existing building would be grandfathered as far as parking, with no additional parking being required at this point. No one else wished to speak regarding this item, and Chmn. Merl closed the Public Hearing at 10:55 p.m. Comm. Suard and Mr. Schubach discussed the specific similar- ities and suitability of the two properties for use by this business, as well as the requirement that the business control the noise levels of their customers' motorcycles. Comm. Suard suggested that those vehicles exceeding the allowable noise levels be "trailered" from the site and noted the motorcycles caused less parking problems than cars. He also discussed with Mr. Schubach the changes made in the conditions regarding prohibition of vehicle testing on local streets, versus no road testing on local, residential streets. Mr. Schubach stated that condition could be changed, but that condition would be applicable to only the owner and his employees. •Mr. Schubach reiterated that a traffic study was being conducted, but he was not aware when it would be finished. Comm. Oakes felt the noise factor was the predominant problem. She suggested a the planter at the rear of the parking area, lowering the wall and creating a buffering landscape area would decrease the noise level for the residents. She also suggested additional signs on site stating the motor had to be stopped upon entering the property. Comm. Suard added that all bikes leaving the shop must have a street -legal, functioning muffler or be "trailered" from the property. Mr. Wood responded Comm. Suard's statement would be impossible for the applicant to adhere to; and the applicant would have to appeal this requirement. Mr. Wood agreed that only legal mufflers would be installed. Comm. Suard felt this condition should be added, to which Mr. Wood continued to object, explaining that street -legal mufflers are installed at no charge as a service to the community, but motorcycle owners cannot automatically replace mufflers without the owners' consent. MOTION by Comm. Suard to APPROVE application CUP 92-15 with the following changes previously discussed: the wall is to comply with the need of the neighbor, all the motorcycles exiting the shop must have street -legal mufflers or be trailered. The motion FAILED due to lack of a second. Comm. Di Monda did not feel that noise was an issue that the Commission should be enforcing, as it was_a Police Dept. 13 P.C. Minutes 1-5-93 • enforcement issue. He agreed motorcycles leaving the shop should havestreet-legal mufflers, but didnot feel it was fair to put the business owner in the positionof having to enforce that requirement, which was the responsibility of the Police Dept. MOTION by Comm. Marks to DENY application CUP 92-15 due to the number of accidents within the area, the opposition of the residents and inadequate parking. The motion FAILED due to lack of a second. Comm. Oakes felt businesses should not be penalized for existing traffic issues. MOTION by Comm. Oakes, seconded by Chmn. Merl, to APPROVE application CUP 92-15 Staff's recommendation, with the following changes: (1) the change to Condition #5• as discussed, subject to the neighbor's requirements regarding the wall, (2) additional signage be placed on the curb/drive- way stating the engine must be cut; subject to the Planning Director's approval, (3) allowing no test driving on local, residential streets and (4) inclusion of the definition of "light repair" as noted in the previous report. AYES: Comm. Di Monda, Oakes, Chmn. Merl NOES: Comm. Marks, Suard ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None - 4 Chinn.. Merl stated this item was APPROVED, subject to appeal to the City Council within 10 days from the date of this meeting. The Commission requested a letter be sent to the City Manager requesting stronger enforcement by the Police Dept. regarding the noise levels produced by motorcycles and an explanation of the Police Dept's. procedures when handling noise complaints, to include mentioning specifically the State Law regarding mufflers on motorcycles and noise levels. -STAFF ITEMS a. Repor - om the City Treasurer regarding sale= =nd use tax (continue • om December 1, 1992 meeting) b. Memorandum regardin• e City Cou.- /Planning Commission/ School District annual '.t ing. c. Memorandum regarding •uth Bay in tory of cities requiring Condit'- al Use Permits for to body/auto paint facilities. d. Plan g Department activity report of October (con ',ued om December 1, 1992 meeting) and November, 1992. 14 P.C. Minutes 1-5-93 PLEASE BRING TRIS ITEM PROM YOUR JULY 27 PACKET (IT APPEARED AS ITEM NO. 12 ON THAT MEETING.) July 19, 1993 �'—i a1I3 Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of City Council August 10, 1993 REVISING SECTION 2-56 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ELIMINATE DOCUMENTED THREE (3) BID PROCESS FOR PURCHASES UNDER $1,000 Recommendation It is recommended that Council adopt the attached revisions to Section 2-56 of the Municipal Code to eliminate the three (3) bid system for purchases under $1,000. Background Historically, City employees have been required to obtain three (3) bids for every City purchase. Attachment A shows an example of the type of paper work staff is required to complete for these purchases. With the downsizing of City staff, the management team is attempting to identify and eliminate procedures that may be counterproductive (and costly) to the organization in favor of focusing on delivery of service to the public. Attachment B is a sample list of cities and the limits over which a documented three (3) bid system is required. Analysis Respecting that the spirit of the three bid system is to obtain the best prices on behalf of the taxpayer as well as to afford all businesses equal opportunity to compete for public dollars, the futility of such efforts for minor purchases becomes evident in the bureaucratic process of verifying the bids as demonstrated by the scenario below: Employee A has been directed to purchase ten (10) data processing items which would total approximately $500. The employee may be well aware pagel that Frys has terrific discounted prices and it would be a reasonable choice on behalf of the City to make such a purchase there. However, per the bid requirements, the employee must proceed to bid each item separately, taking the time to call other vendors for the same purchase. As it turns out, two of the items can be obtained at a slightly lower price at another store. The employee then needs to either justify purchasing all of the items at Fry's or proceed to draft an additional purchase order to obtain the two items. Once completed, a Finance Clerk needs to check the purchase orders and bid sheets to ensure that the low bid is being recommended After the purchase order is approved, the employee proceeds to the two locations to buy the items. Recognizing that the code has been in place to ensure that City dollars are spent conscientiously, administrative practices would continue to dictate responsible spending. A revised scenario may be: Employee A (who is an expert in data processing), knowing that Frys has excellent prices for computer components, double checks this by making an additional call to another discount company. Once Employee A verifies that Frys has good prices, a Purchase Order for all ten (10) items is presented to the Department Head for signature. The Department Head evaluates the Purchase Order as being reasonable and forwards it to Finance. Finance authorizes the purchase and Employee A buys the items. Employee A is now free to spend additional time providing Data Processing services to the City (which is what we hired Employee A for)! With a ceiling on the three (3) bid system, the City will benefit in the following ways: Staff efficiency: As indicated above, we hire most of our employees to provide specific services to the community (maintenance workers, firefighters, recreation leaders etc.). To the extent that we reduce the time they spend on bureaucratic procedures is to the extent that they are serving the residents at what they do best. Reduced backlog at Finance: Finance indicates that for May and June, 1993 approximately 80 percent of the purchase orders processed were under $1,000. Like many other departments, Finance has been downsized while obtaining added responsibilities (i.e., the merge of citation processing). To reduce the burden on this department of checking and rechecking POs would page2 free Clerks and the Finance Director to focus on the more complex and sizable purchases and contracts in the City. Increase staff's ability to purchase items in Hermosa Beach: Due to the small size of the City, often there is only one shop in town that carries a given product. While it may cost slightly more at times to buy in Hermosa, the benefit to the local businesses as well as the return to the City in taxes and spillover spending (i.e., the merchant spending that money in town as well) may be well worth the extra pennies it may cost at the outset. Eliminate duplicity in obtaining bids: If a staff member fords a good price for a product and needs to buy a similar product a week later, this system would eliminate the duplicitous process of calling the same three (3) vendors each time when it can be assumed that the prices are the same. Some of our workers report that calling vendors over and over again (just for the bid process) results in a loss of credibility with some businesses. It is noteworthy that the City currently does have some "Open POs" with vendors whose prices have been examined to be competitive. These accounts can be used up to a ceiling that varies from $50 to $1200. Due to the ease of using these vendors (purchases can be made quickly with a material requisition), employees tend to use them whenever possible. Adding the ability to buy from other vendors with ease would expand the field for efficient purchases and may even result in employees obtaining more competitive pricing utilizing a vendor not on the Open PO list. Speed up the completion of projects: Time is money and the time it takes for P.O. authorization could be more effectively spent on moving onto other vital projects. Increase accountability and responsibility for individual employees: When employees are given the freedom to make responsible choices, history has shown that more responsible behavior follows. Set-up expectations and administrative policies that encourage responsible spending and give the employee the freedom to meet that expectation unencumbered by tedious paper work. More in-line with practices in other cities: An examination of Attachment B shows that a majority of these cities has even higher ceilings than the recommended $1,000. It is notable that some of these cities have central page3 purchasing (where individual departments are not responsible for purchasing) which has typically supported less stringent procedures (recognizing that the control is centralized), however, a modest level of $1,000 would not seem out of line in consideration of decentralized purchasing. City Council will still control the budget through the allocation process, therefore, there will be no net increase in spending because of this change. In - fact, it would likely reduce the cost to the City in the long run through staff time savings and increased productivity. It is anticipated that a new system would be a morale boost for beleaguered departments during these tough fiscal times and would better serve the taxpayer whose primary concern is rightfully the bottomline: more bang for the buck. Other alternatives available to Council include: 1) Receive and File. 2) Establish a higher or lower ceiling. 3) Request additional information. FISCAL IMPACT: NO IMPACT ON THE BUDGET. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment A: Sample Bid Sheet 2. Attachment B: List of cities & bid ceilings 3. Amended Ordinance 4. Section 2-56 of Municipal Code Respectfully Submitted, Ma Acti oney City Manager page4 Villi Copeland, Finance Director 4-1c_ L. O U Il L It VENDORS A) COMPANY: v ADDRESS : '3 � f o S r -cam c CITY, STATE: rk,v,' TELEPHONE : ( -- S-0 0 —q2-7 QUOTE BY :_ c,_&. /uti ,I BUSINESS LICENSE: YES NO AtFachment "A" DELIVERY CHARGE:YES NO EXPECTED DEL DATE: OUT OF STATE VENDOR: REQUEST TAX ADDED TO INVOICE YES CONTRACTORS ONLY: YES WORKERS COMP INSURANCE NO (CONTRACTORS, LOCAL DELIVERY) B) COMPANY: ADDRESS : / 4' o a.„,..� CITY, STATE : 4 44,14 TELEPHONE • 7 Z -- QUOTE BY. BUSINESS LICENSE: YES NO DELIVERY CHARGE:YES NO EXPECTED DEL DATE: OUT OF STATE VENDOR: REQUEST TAX.ADDED TO INVOICE YES CONTRACTORS ONLY: YES WORKERS COMP INSURANCE NO (CONTRACTORS, LOCAL DELIVERY; • C) COMPANY: 4..404141G ADDRESS:4 in_ CITY, STATE: TELEPHONE : q S'' QUOTE BY : �(,�, �1,pi, ,.ia -tie art l., A,r4 L _•.. BUSINESS LICENSE: YES DELIVERY CHARGE:YES NO EXPECTED DEL DATE: OUT OF STATE VENDORS: REQUE: TAX ADDED TO INVOICE YES CONTRACTORS ONLY: YES WORKERS COMP INSURANCE NO NO (CONTRACTORS, LOCAL DELIVERY: #ITEMS PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 1 I 1 VENDOR A EACH TOTAL VENDOR B EACH TOTAL VENDOR C EACH TOTA: 2. 3,s2, a ,S ttn 237, l U .fin. I -�.,.,.i DELIVERY VENDOR TOTALS TAX 7. ^� ,e 4u 2 7, �i 1.; 0 112 ,i,s° Attachment B CITY CONTACTED MINIMUM AMOUNT ON WHICH COMPETITIVE BIDS REQUIRED REDONDO BEACH $ 1,500 EL SEGUNDO $ 7,500 MANHATTAN BEACH $ 500 HAWTHORNE $ 5,000 TORRANCE ALL P.O.'S CULVER CITY $ 250 CARSON $ 1,500 GARDENA $ 5,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 93 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 2, "ADMINISTRATION", OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO THE OPEN MARKET PROCEDURE FOR PURCHASES OF LESS THAN FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS IN VALUE . THE CITY COUNCIL OF '1'H.L CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN 'tilE FOLLOWING TEXT AMENDMENT TO 'HIE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE: SECTION 1. That Chapter 2 Section 2-56 paragraph (a) of the Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 2-56. "Open market procedure for purchases of less than five thousand dollars in value." "Purchases of supplies and equipment of an estimated value in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) or less may be made by the purchasing officer in the open market at the best prices obtainable and to the best advantage of the city without observing the procedure prescribed by section 2-57; bids or quotations shall be taken as follows: (a) Minimum number of bids. For purchases over $1,000, at least three (3) bids or quotations solicited by written requests to prospective responsible vendors, by telephone, or public notice posted on a public bulletin board in the City Hall." 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective thirty days after the date of its adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of August 1993. PRESIDENT, of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7,14 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY § 2-56 ADMINISTRATION § 2-57 source of supply or when the commodity can be obtained only from one vendor. (Ord. No. 205 N.S., § 7) Sec. 2-56. Open market procedure for purchases of less than five thousand dollars in value. Purchases of supplies and equipment of an estimated value in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) or less may be made by the purchasing officer in the open market at the best prices obtainable and to the best advantage of the city without observing the procedure prescribed by section 2-57; provided, however, that when practicable, bids or quota- tions shall be taken as follows: (a) Minimum number of bids. At least three (3) bids or quotations solicited by written requests to prospective responsible vendors, by telephone, or public notice posted on a public bulletin board in the City Hall. (b) Record. A record of all informal bids and quotations shall be kept and be open to public inspection for a reasonable period of time. (Ord. No. 205 N.S., § 8; Ord. No. 373 N.S., § 1, 11-18-69; Ord. No. 76-527, § 1, 7-13-76) Sec. 2-57. Formal contract procedure for purchases exceeding five thousand dollars in value. Except as otherwise provided herein, purchases for supplies and equipment of estimated value greater than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) shall be by written contract with the lowest and best responsible bidder. The following procedure is deemed to be in the best interest to the city: (a) Notice inviting bids. Notice inviting bids shall in - elude a general description of the articles to be pur- chased, shall state where bid blanks and specifications may be secured, and the time and place for the open- ing of bids. (b) Published notice. Notice inviting bids shall be given at least ten days before the date of opening of the bids. Supp. No. 9-77 37 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City City Council August 3, 1993 Regular Meeting of August 10, 1993 THE STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH, CIP 90-144 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the following proposed enhancements to the Strand project. A. Strand lighting $ 93,768 B. Overlay bike path between 24th and 90,000 35th Streets C. Replacement of flashing light signals 14,500 and signs D. Trash receptacle covers 11,000 E. Striping legends 4,000 F. Planter area at 35th Street & Hermosa Ave. 16,000 G. Contract management and inspection 24,452 2. Approve budget adjustment in the amount of $321,675.16 3. Approve professional services agreement with Harris & Associates for contract management and inspection services (Exhibit 1). Background: At the City Council meeting of December 15, 1992, a recommendation to approve the plans and specifications for the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path was approved. At that meeting, the City Council authorized the solicitation of bids on the project. On February 9, 1993, the City Council approved a recommendation to sign a contract with EMMA Corporation for the reconstruction of Strand pavement and wall for a contract amount of $659,100. Analysis: The City contracted for the construction of the Strand Bikeway and pedestrian path which included over 6,000 lineal feet of 3ft. high concrete wall along the beach side of the bikeway. The original contract did not include the following major items: A. Strand lighting B. Overlay bike path between 24th and 35th Streets C. Replacement of flashing light signals and signs - 1 - 8 D. Trash receptacle covers E. Striping legends F. Planter area at 35th Street & Hermosa Ave. G. Contract management and inspection A. Strand Lighting Several manufacturers were contacted and lighting standards were examined. A meeting was held between City Council member, Robert Essertier, Planning Commissioner Chairman, Joseph Di Monda, City Manager and Public Works Director on July 29, 1993 to discuss several design options for Strand lighting. A lighting standard was selected (Attachment 1) with the understanding that colors will be examined at a later date when sample lighting are available. In addition, the cost of 3 alternative poles were examined: 12' Pole 20' Pole Cost per Pole Cost per Pole 1. Aluminum pole $ 550 $ 750 2. Marbelite pole $ 500 $ 750 3. Stainless steel pole $1,500 $3,100 After careful examination of the type of lighting standard, glare condition and cost, the standard lighting with 12' aluminum poles were selected for the residential areas, and 20' aluminum poles with flood lighting were selected for the downtown area. The total cost of lighting for Strand is approximately $93,768. This cost does not include installation. B. Overlay Bike path between 24th and 35th Streets. This item was not included in the original contract. However, it is important to reconstruct the remaining portions of the bike path in order to accomplish the goal of the original TDA application. The cost of repairing the remaining portion of the bike path is approximately $90,000. C. Replacement of flashing light signals and signs. This item was also excluded from the original contract. The replacement will cost approximately $14,500. D. Trash receptacle covers. This item was not properly addressed in the original contract. The relocation of the trash area was included; however, covers were not identified at that time. A design has been established for trash container covers (Attachment 2). In order to properly maintain trash for this project, new covers must be obtained. The cost of this item is approximately $11,000. E. Striping legends. At the June 8, 1993 City council meeting, three striping alternatives to assist with Strand safety were reviewed and a recommendation to further study Alternative "A" (Attachment 3) was approved. A more detailed design is being examined for this purpose (Attachment 4). Cost of special striping at three identified locations of 2nd Street, 8th Street, and 22nd Street, is approximately $4,000. F. Planter area at 35th Street & Hermosa Ave. The existing planter at 35th and Hermosa Ave. was removed due to construction of the bike path at this location. New planters have been considered at this location (Attachment 5). The cost of replacement is approximately $16,000. G. Contract management and inspection. This is one of the most important items to be considered. Proper documentation is required to eliminate the possibility of law suits and claims. o Administrative Documentation The numerous deficiencies in the work must be adequately documented with reference to the specifications. Written notice of deficiencies have to be made to the Contractor as soon as possible. There are numerous issues related to Contractor requested change orders and time extensions which remain to be resolved and documented. The deficiencies in the work should be immediately documented fully to enhance the City's position of requiring remedial work while avoiding a potential claim. o Technical Assistance Specialized technical knowledge is required in order to affect optimum repair of the work, while avoiding - 3 - exposure to lengthy and costly contract disputes, which could lead to litigation with either the Contractor or the Bonding Company. Numerous repairs such as surface preparation, water or wet blasting, grinding, "stoning", chipping, removal and replacements are among the repair work necessary. Continuous full-time inspection will be necessary to help avoid additional problems. As a "third party" consultant, Harris & Associates will provide an unbiased perspective and we have the necessary resources to address the challenges which exist on the project. Due to the nature of the project and timing, staff is requesting exemption from the current contract service procedures. The total cost of this item is a "not to exceed" amount of $24,452. Repair of existing wall. The contractor has been notified of the repair work required to improve the existing wall. Several methods have been identified and were examined to seek the best possible solution. The preferred methods are as follows: 1. A. Stoning, grinding, removal of snap tie plugs, cleanup, and all other repair work as described in the Punch List. B. All removals and replacements. C. Repair lettering panels. 2. Wet blast entire wall. 3. Apply hardner-sealer immediately after blasting (begin within 24 hours of wet blasting). 4. Fill air packets and voids, all to be in relief ("not flushed out"). Other items to be considered. 1. Line up the street centerline with the 6' opening. This item was introduced after the approval of the plans and specifications by the City Council. In order to twenty-four areas would remove and replace portions of the wall at the locations, light poles and trash receptacle need to be removed and replaced. The cost of this item is approximately $144,000. MTA representatives have indicated that removal and replacement of the new wall will not be paid by the TDA, Regional Fund. 2. Bike path improvement at 24th Street. It was recommended that improvements to the bike path area along 24th Street be examined. This item will not be eligible for funding since it is outside the project boundary. 3. Paint contrasting color at all "street name" locations. It has been suggested that all "street name" signs be painted in a shade darker than the current sand color. This will make the street signs easier to see and read. Funding Total State Gas Tax Funds are as follows: TDA Art. 3 TDA Art. 3 Total (Regional) (Local) TDA Revenue: $1,123,620.32 $ 53,996.14 $1,177,616.46 Total FY 92-93 Expenses: (Less) 606,941.30 Total 92-93 Balance: FY 93-94 Expenditures: (Less) Balance: Proposed FY 93-94 Expenditures: 1. Enhancements A. Strand lighting B. Overlay bike path between 24th and 35th Streets C. Replacement of flashing light signals and signs D. Trash receptacle covers E. Striping legends F. Planter area at 35th St. & Hermosa Ave. G. Contract management and inspection $ 570,675.16 $ 249,000.00 $ 321,675.16 93,768.00 90,000.00 14,500.00 11,000.00 4,000.00 16,000.00 24,452.00 2. Salary Related Expenses $ 67,955.16 Total Expenses: - 5 - $ 321,675.16 The recommended project enhancements will be funded with the State Gas Tax Fund (TDA Article 3) excess funds. The above projects will require approval of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority since it was not included in the original contract. Attachments Respectfully submitted, a,,,,„ al"K. litGc4%___' Amy Ami°rani Director of Public Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: Concur: Viki Copeland Maloney Director of Finance A ing City Manager pworks/STRANDEN EXHIBIT 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1993, at Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, through its duly elected, qualified and acting MAYOR, hereinafter called the CITY, and HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT". W I T N E S S E T H: That the CONSULTANT for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the CITY herein expressed, does hereby agree to furnish to the CITY professional services and materials, as follows: ARTICLE I - Scope of Work CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in Exhibit "A" entitled Proposal and attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. ARTICLE II - Costs The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or any part of the work performed under this Agreement at the rates and in the manner established in the attached Exhibit "A". Total expenditure made under this contract shall not exceed the sum of $24,452. Any increase in contract amount or scope shall be by express written amendment approved by the City and Harris & Associates. ARTICLE III - Method of Payment The CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for costs incurred in the performance hereof as are allowable under the provisions of Part l-15 of the Federal Procurement Regulations. CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed monthly in arrears based upon the hourly services provided. CONSULTANT shall submit invoices in triplicate and addressed to the City, c/o the Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-0299. ARTICLE IV - Subcontracting CONSULTANT shall not be permitted to subcontract any portion of this contract without the express written consent of the CITY. 1 ARTICLE V - Completion Date It is anticipated that the consultant services will be required for 30 days from the date hereof, however, the City's Director of Public Works may extend the completion date as required by construction operations. Any contract time extension shall require the express written consent of the Director of Public Works. ARTICLE VI - Accounting Records CONSULTANT must maintain accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred which records and documents shall be kept available at the CONSULTANT's California office during the contract period and thereafter for three years from the date of final payment of Federal funds hereunder. ARTICLE VII - Ownership of Data All data, maps, photographs, and other material collected or prepared under the contract shall become the joint property of the CITY. ARTICLE VIII - Termination This contract may be terminated at any time for breach and CITY may terminate unilaterally and without cause upon seven (7) days written notice to the CONSULTANT. All work performed pursuant to the contract and prior to the date of termination may be claimed for reimbursement. ARTICLE IX - Assignability CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer interest in this contract without the prior written consent of the CITY. ARTICLE X - Amendment It is mutually understood and agreed that no alteration or variation of the terms of this contract, or any subcontract requiring the approval of the CITY, shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties hereto, and approved by all necessary parties. ARTICLE XI - Non -Solicitation Clause The CONSULTANT warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or persons, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the State shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 2 ARTICLE XII - Equal Opportunity Assurance During the performance of this contract,. the CONSULTANT agrees as follows: A. The CONSULTANT will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, sex, creed, color or national origin. The CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, sex, creed, color or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoffs or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. B. The CONSULTANT will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, sex, creed, color or national origin. C. The CONSULTANT will permit access to his books, records and accounts by the applicant agency, the State, the Federal Highway Administration and/or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with this nondiscrimination clause. D. In the event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract, this contract may be canceled, terminated or suspended in whole or in part. ARTICLE XIII - Druq-Free Workplace Certification During the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT agrees to provide a drug-free workplace as outlined in the Government Code Section 8355 by: A. Publishing a statement notifying employees that company policy prohibits the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance, and defining actions to be taken for violating the policy. B. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs and penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. C. Providing that every employee who works on the proposed Contract will receive a copy of the company's drug-free policy statement and requiring that these employees agree to abide by the terms of the company's statement as a condition of employment on the Contract. 3 ARTICLE XIV - Clean Air Act During the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) as amended. ARTICLE XV - State Compensation Laws A. In accordance with State Compensation Laws, the CONSULTANT shall carry Worker's Compensation insurance for all persons employed in the performance of services as set forth herein. The CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with a certificate verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the CITY before commencing services under this Agreement. Such policy shall require thirty (30) days notice to the CITY in writing prior to cancellation. In the event that legal action is commenced to enforce or declare the rights created under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of costs and reasonable attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the court. No member of the governing body of the CITY and no other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and in the CONSULTANT shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance. The CONSULTANT covenants that he presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of his services hereunder. The CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of CONSULTANT by CITY and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both CITY and CONSULTANT. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable federal statutes and regulations as amended. The invalidity in whole or part of any provision of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable federal statutes and regulations as amended. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ATTEST: A Municipal Corporation By: MAYOR, City of Hermosa Beach By: CONSULTANT APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONSULTANT CITY ATTORNEY 5 "EXHIBIT A" Proposal and Scope of Services Scope of Services Harris & Associates will provide inspection services for CIP 90-144, Strand Bikeway & Pedestrian Path, as follows: Inspection services will be furnished on an hourly basis at the rates stated below. Mr. Walt Bent will be assigned to provide inspection services under the direction of the Director of Public Works or her authorized representative. Additional personnel will be available, at City request, to provide additional expertise related to the project construction. Fees Compensation will be on an hourly basis at the rate of $68/hour for inspection services, (this rate includes the inspector at $65/hour and $3.00/hour for use of Harris & Associates' vehicle). Rates for other personnel required for services incidental to inspection services, will be at Harris & Associates' Standard Rates, subject to prior approval of the Public Works Director. • C IWeGRAW EDISONIr Credenza Dome Top from McGraw -Edison is the epitome in symmetry... perfect roundness that provides an uninterrupted design flow from every viewing angle. Dome Top, like all Credenza fixtures, offers fea- tures so versatile it can be used in small areas such as walkways and large areas like parking lots. While maintaining a look of continuity and uniformity throughout. Choose from three sizes (Small with a maximum of 250 Watts, Medium with a maximum of 400 Watts and Large with a maximum of 1,000 Watts), so a single look can be carried through diverse areas of a project. Combined with three mounting varieties, choice of high pressure sodium or metal halide, five optical packages and ten colors, Credenza offers an unparalled 2,100 variations of your choice. Design Features • 100-1000 Wattt'. irw 20 1/2' •— 24' 28' 20 1/2' 6' • 24' -•7 1/2'• 28' 9' 13' 15 3/8' 17 7/8' f 11' Spider or 12 5/8' 78• Yoke Mount. 1 6' 7 1/2' s' 6' 7 1/2' s' Spun aluminum dome finished in polyester powder coat. Appealing round shape reduces EPA and size of poles required. Controlled and fully rotatable optics offer five distinct beam patterns. Anodized hydroformed reflectors provide superior and consistent performance. Die-cast, heavy-duty main load-bearing structure serves as heat sink for cooler operation and longer ballast life. Full circumference neoprene gasketing prevents entrance of contaminants. Hinged door with impact resistant glass lens. Yoke Mount and Spider Mount (not shown) feature black polyester powder coat support pipes for detailed, controlled appearance. Cast aluminum pole top fitter combines structural integrity and aesthetic lines for added eye appeal. Round straight steel or aluminum poles with matched pole top covers. t ATTACHMENT 1 one-piece reflectors, manufactured with McGraw-Edison's custoin hydroforming technologies. This advanced method produces seamless reflectors for superior, repeatable photo- metric performance. Because of the creative possibilities which arm, spider, and wall-mountability provide, architects and lighting designers can raise lighting excitement to a new level. The fact is, no other fixture we know of offers greater design flexibility. Using different combinations of color, fittings, poles, bases, mounting, and tops, more than 2,100 different variations are possible when specifying Credenza area lights. T o find this degree of versatility in a fixture of such obvious high style and good looks is very satisfying indeed. Family ties make Credenza stunning, versatile, and architecturally impressive. Stunning to see, and to see by, in many kinds of architectural settings. GOOD LIGHT & GOOD LOOKS, DAWN 'TIL DUSK F)rom a design standpoint, Credenza's distinctive look de- velops continuity of appearance throughout an entire project. F)rom a time standpoint, the fixture's dayform beauty and energy efficiency work together around the clock, delivering performance with distinction and dependability in the most advanced architectural applications as well as the harshest environments. D awn to dusk, Credenza's rounded, sym- metrical shape makes itself evident as a unique architectural presence. When day is done, the fixture softly lights up its own space, without glare, serving with particular effectiveness in those applications where high minimum footcandle levels are desired, since that's where McGraw -Edison products truly light the way. A 11 Credenza fixtures feature highly tooled • 11--U-t6 CORCCRTLIAL OFSIj4 GP 111I.2 SIA14,41( CIRCLE IRIIKE.CA 92114 X14 VP ' cI vI Get>fw 1461-t1' « Kgtte CO4CC.TUAL 07M4 ; P 18002 SAYPASK CIRCLE 1RYINE,C.1 92714 WAId/ 1.1 9 / . _ . ;,. f W.V ek1 12 ° - _lip IN fD , _Lt'tS Ue f 1' tt• :f IT 1....1.1 tall2t), Cle Go4Pe (.(41\16.) r-1 .1-.t11.0A.- 04111-41 -to isoN1-4- , ATTACHMENT 2 9002PSKY ARKS GAP 1IDi CIRCLE IRYINE,CA 92114 STRAND PEDESTRIAN XING .................................................. a f; f; ATTACHMENT 3 INCIIMMIWIECNECENIMMEIN wows •- f ►2 ATTACHMENT 5 CONCEPTUAL OESICN CAP 18002 SKYPARK CIRCLE IRYINE.CA 92714 RUG 10 '93 17:32 FROM THE ABORETUM HGE.001 /t J STOP ge G4--=> August 4, 1993 Honorable Mayor and MemlSers & Hermosa Beach City Council the Regular Meeting of August 10, 1993 (CONTINUED FROM JULY 13, 1993, FOR RECOMMENDATION ON MODIFICATIONS) SUBJECT: LOCATIONS: APPLICANT/: APPELLANT PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-12 CITY YARD & AND VALLEY DRIVE SOUTH OF 6TH STREET MACPHERSON OIL COMPANY 2716 OCEAN PARK BOULEVARD SANTA MONICA, CA 90405 REQUESTS: 1. OIL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION ON THE CITY YARD SITE 2. CONSTRUCTION OF AN OIL PIPELINE ALONG VALLEY DRIVE Planning Commission Recommendation Incorporate further modifications to the conditions of approval as described below and underlined in the Planning Commission recommended resolution. Staff Recommendation Incorporate most of the modification recommended by the Commission, as described below in staff responses, highlighted in bold text. The staff recommended modifications are underlined in the attached staff recommended resolution. Background At the meeting of August 3, 1993, the Planning Commission considered the Council's modifications to the conditions of approval. The Commission commented on selected issues as described below, supporting most of the modifications of the Council, commenting against others, and further recommending some additional modifications. For further background please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff reports. Analysis While the Planning Commission supported many of the modifications made by the Council, they made several recommendations, the most notable were as follows: - Require a Property Value Protection Plan - Route truck traffic to and from the south only, temporarily making Valley Drive a two-way street - 1 - 9 The following is a complete list of the recommendations of the Commission in response to the modifications made by the City Council. The bold text is staff's response to each recommendation. SECTION 1. General Condition #4 The P.C. workover modified The P.C. limiting holidays originally imposed limiting the number of days the rig can be operated to 60 days. The Council instead it to 90 days, as originally recommended by staff. is recommending a clarification that the provision use of these rigs to weekdays specifically exclude Staff has incorporated the clarification in the draft resolution. P.C. added Conditions 12: The Planning Commission originally imposed a condition (#12) that all wells must be drilled and completed within three years. Because of descriptions of the needed time from in the EIR, staff and the Council did not support such a restriction. The Commission thus recommends a time restriction based on the EIR to be as follows: "All wells must be drilled and completed within 55 months from the start of drilling of the first exploratory well in accordance with the following schedule: EXPLORATION AND TEST PHASE 12 MONTHS (Initial construction, Drilling rig erection, exploratory drilling, production testing) CONSTRUCTION PHASE 9 MONTHS (Permanent facility construction) DRILLING PHASE 34 MONTHS (Development Drilling, 1 month per well) Staff supports adding this condition, and has incorporated into the attached draft resolution of approval. This is consistent with time frames noted in the EIR, and incorporates additional time for the drilling of 4 water disposal wells which will be used in lieu of the sanitary sewer as a mitigation measure. 13: The Commission continues to recommend a requirement for a property value protection plan, with an added statement that the plan be the same that the drilling company works with in Huntington Beach. Staff has not taken a position on this matter, and has not incorporated such a requirement but continues to suggest that possibly it should be studied. SECTION 2. Land Use Development. Condition #2 The Commission recommends adding after "...a complete soil analysis shall be performed" the following: "and approved by all applicable governing agencies having jurisdiction over the project" Staff supports this addition since it does not include an extra layer of Planning Commission review as previously imposed by the Commission, and has thus incorporated it into the resolution of approval. Condition #3 The Commission recommends that the condition contain the Uniform Fire Code standard. The applicant stated at the time of plan submittal that, at a minimum, they would provide 10% above the minimum requirements of the Fire Code and the State Division of Oil and Gas (which have the same requirement). The applicant has also submitted a calculation of the size of the proposed tank basin with the 6 -foot depth, and shows that the basin is about 2 times the volume of the largest tank. Staff recommends that the condition be modified to eliminate the reference to 1 1/2 times the volume of the tanks and instead require 10% above the standard of the Fire Code, and has incorporated into the resolution. SECTION 3. Public Safety Condition #10 The Planning Commission recommends changing "drawing" to "document". Staff agrees, and has incorporated it into resolution SECTION 6. Vehicle Traffic and Circulation Condition #4 The Planning Commission continues to recommend that this condition be changed to limit incoming and outgoing truck traffic to Valley Drive south of 6th Street. Staff does not support, as previously stated, as it would double truck traffic south of 6th Street, and increase through traffic as Valley Drive would become two-way south of 2nd Street. The truck route established by the EIR is for trucks to enter the site via Pier and Valley, and Exit via Valley and Herondo. Condition #11 The Commission recommends adding "and in close out phase" at the end of this condition regarding maintaining streets in their current condition. Staff supports, and has incorporated into resolution Condition #12 The Commission recommends adding the following underlined text" "The operator shall perform the actions on the existing pavement as recommended by the soils or highway engineer; the operator will hire a licensed contractor and provide street profiles, drawings and engineering to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department prior to work commencing" Staff supports the clarification, and has incorporated into resolution. SECTION 7. Sanitary Sewer The Commission recommends deleting all the conditions of this section, and include only one condition which prohibits use of the sanitary sewer, since wells will be used. Staff supports, as the water disposal wells will handle wastewater, and has incorporated into both resolutions, with an added statement to make exception for office and restroom facilities. SECTION 8. Noise/Vibration Condition # la The Commission recommends 30 -foot high. Staff does not object, and Condition #7 The Commission recommends modifying the text as follows: deleting "approximately" in front of has incorporated into resolution "Well workover rigs or any other rig that is used shall be operated between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. during daytime weekday hours only, excluding holidays..." Staff supports the clarification and has incorporated into resolution. SECTION 9. Landscaping Condition #3 The Commission recommends deleting "unless a 16 -foot high perimeter wall is installed," which would thus require trees 16 -feet high in conjunction with the 12 -foot high wall. - 4 - Staff supports, and has incorporated into resolution Condition #4 and #5 The Commission recommends inserting "and field review" between "satisfaction" and "of the Planning Director." Staff supports, and has incorporated into resolution SECTION 10. Aesthetics Condition #7 The Commission recommends changing "A decorative masonry or concrete wall..", to "A split -face block wall..." Staff supports, and has incorporated into resolution, as we now know the specific type of wall the applicant will install which is preferable to concrete. Condition #10 The Commission recommends adding "at the expense of the operator" at the end of this condition requiring dismantling the derrick if its idle more than a year. Staff supports the clarification, and has incorporated into: resolution. Condition #14 This condition requires the operator to "diligently pursue all drilling until all 34 wells are completed...". The Commission desired some clarification since the EIR speaks of 30 well'and the plans show 35. The confusion arises because the an existing well on site is proposed to be used for water disposal, and 4 additional water disposal wells are to be drilled. As was always intended 30 oil wells are to be drilled. A total limit of 30 well could be imposed to avoid any inconsistency with the EIR (thus limiting the oil wells to 25), or this condition could be modified to state 35 wells, recognizing that 5 of the wells are for wastewater disposal and are a mitigation measure. While not included in the EIR, the prospect of using water disposal wells was mentioned as a possibility in the EIR. Their use to mitigate disposal into the sanitary sewer is a benefit. Staff recommends clarifying by stating "until all 30 oil wells, and all 5 water disposal wells..." and has incorporated into both resolutions. SECTION 11. Odors/Vapor/Air Pollution The Commission imposed a condition for the permittee to pay for staff training by the AQMD. However, the training is free and would not replace AQMD enforcement, it would be to train staff to observe and detect problems. The Council did not include this - 5 - condition, as recommended by staff. While staff thinks this is a good idea it is neutral as to whether the applicant should compensate for the cost of staff time. The Commission continues to recommend including this condition with a clarification that the applicant must compensate for lost staff time as well, and that staff would be trained to observe and detect problems. While staff supports obtaining staff training to observe and detect problems, a condition was not incorporated as it would be the responsibility of the City. SECTION 13. Pipeline Construction Condition #17 The Planning Commission recommends adding a requirement to this condition for monitoring subsidence to ensure no pipeline damage, that a report be submitted to the City. Staff supports, and has incorporated into the resolution: "The annual subsidence survey shall include a report to the city on monitoring efforts to insure pipeline damage has not occurred" SECTION 14. II. The Commission recommends adding to the notification requirement for emergencies that "the City will provide a list of phone numbers" at the end of the first sentence. Staff supports, and has incorporated into the resolution. chAel Schubach Planning Director Wunp =mom- Mary L1Lo ^- Mary Intrim—City Manager Attachments en Robertson Associate Planner 1. P.C. recommended resolution 2. Staff recommended resolution 3. Memo from Mr. Gautschy re: height of dike wall 4. Draft P.C. Minutes 8/3/93 p/pcsrtoil 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ' RESOLUTION 93 - (PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OIL DEVELOPMENT AT THE CITY MAINTENANCE YARD, 555 6TH STREET, AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN OIL PIPELINE ALONG VALLEY DRIVE FROM SIXTH STREET SOUTH TO HERONDO STREET WHEREAS, on May 8, 1990, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the project, thereby complying with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act in review of this project; WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR for the project; WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on July 13, 1993, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and again held a public meeting on August 10, 1993, to consider the Planning Commission recommendations in response to some modifications made the following findings: A. The site is zoned M-1 and is suitable for the type and density of the proposed development; B. Design of the proposed project is compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City's General Plan, the zoning ordinance, and the Oil Code, and implements the mitigations measures, where applicable, as set forth in the Certified EIR; C. An Environmental Impact Report has been adopted and certified by the City and the proposed project with the incorporation of mitigating conditions below, which include the approved 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 mitigation measures contained in the EIR, will eliminate or reduce identified environmental impacts to an acceptable level; D. Any remaining unavoidable adverse environmental impacts are overridden by the benefits of the project as set forth in the adopted Statement of Overriding Considerations; E. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Addenda with the Final EIR to the project prior to making its decision on the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve an oil development project and the construction of an oil pipeline, subject to the following conditions: SECTION 1. GENERAL 1. The testing phase for all production shall be a maximum of one year from the date drilling is initiated. 2. If the project cannot comply with operation standards established by these conditions of approval, after two warnings the operation shall be subject to fines and/or shut down through permit revocation by the City, except in regard to noise, if it is determined that a diligent effort is being made, and a plan has been provided, reviewed and approved by the City Council 3. A minimum of one annual site audit shall take place to inspect for soil contamination as a result of accidental spills in any areas not paved and exposed. Auditor shall be hired by City. 4. The maximum number of days the workover rigs or any other rig that is to be used on-site shall be 90 days per year, and shall be operated weekdays 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. excluding holidays. 5. In the event that a residence with solar panels is affected by shading, a site specific study paid for by the oil contractor shall be conducted to determine economic impact. 6. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 3180 the operation shall be monitored for all conditions of the approval of which the City has responsibility which includes (but not limited to) noise monitoring and inspection of the site for proper maintenance. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. The proposed plans shall be submitted to the division of oil and gas for their review and recommendation; a. Any recommendation by the Division shall be taken into consideration prior to approval, and may be included as conditions of approval. 8. Drill cuttings and other wastes, shall be collected in above ground containers and disposed of at an approved disposal site. Receipts for all disposal of waste product shall be provided within ten (10) days of disposal to the Public Works Director. 9. All requirements, standards, conditions stated within the Oil Production Code, Chapter 21-A, of the City's Municipal Code shall be met, unless more restrictive requirements are imposed through mitigation measures; where it cannot be clearly determined whether the City's Oil Ordinance, Chapter 21-A or mitigation measures are more stringent, the appropriate City staff shall make a determination; appealable to the City Council. 10. Three (3) copies of final building plans including site, - elevation, and floor plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. 11. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with submitted plans. Any minor modification shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Planning Director. 12. All wells must be drilled and completed within 55 months from the start of drilling of the first exploratory well in accordance with the following schedule: EXPLORATION AND TEST PHASE 12 MONTHS (Initial construction, Drilling rig erection, exploratory drilling, production testing) CONSTRUCTION PHASE 9 MONTHS (Permanent facility construction) DRILLING PHASE 34 MONTHS (Development Drilling, 1 month per well) 13. The permittee shall submit a property value protection plan which shall be implemented prior to drilling. Said plan shall establish an "impacted zone" based on noise, view, odor and other potential problems; set forth procedures for property value appraisals, including provisions for arbitration; and set up a method and funding mechanism that will ensure re -imbursement of property value losses attributable to the oil development project. This plan shall be the same that drilling company works with in Huntington Beach and shall be approved by both the Planning Commission and City Council prior to the issuance of any Building Permits. SECTION 2. LAND USE DEVELOPMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. The maximum size for any storage tank of any type shall be forty feet in diameter and sixteen feet in height, appurtenances not included. 2. Prior to construction and prior to obtaining building permits for oil production, a complete soil analysis shall be performed and approved by all applicable governing agencies having jurisdiction over the project. 3. Not more than five tanks shall be installed, and shall be. submerged in a concrete basin which contains the volume required by the State Division of Oil and Gas and the Uniform Fire Code which is as follows: The volumetric capacity of the diked area shall not be less than the greatest amount of liquid that can be released from the larges tank within the diked area. The capacity of the diked areas enclosing more than one tank shall be calculated by deducting the volume of the tanks other than the largest tank below the height of the dike. 4. All wells shall be drilled and cemented in accordance with State Division of Oil and Gas regulations to protect underground aquifers. _ 5. Except for the drill rig and drawworks, no equipment or appurtenant structures shall exceed 16 feet in height from grade as defined by the Oil Code. 6. The electrical service systems shall be designed with sufficientcapacity to minimize surging impacts. 7. The well cellars shall be concrete lined and shall be designed to hold contaminated run-off from on-site sources; or a sump shall be provided. 8. Solid state control console linked to a control system to perform energy conservation functions such as start/stop time programming of motor equipment, data logging of energy consumption and maintenance and service scheduling shall be provided. a. All Electrical machinery where possible shall have a minimum coefficient of efficiency of 0.75. 9. Parking shall be provided on the site consistent with the submitted parking plan to provide adequate parking facilities for all workers involved in oil recovery operations, including exploratory and production phases. 10. All studies, reports, plans and analysis required by any section of this C.U.P. or required by law shall be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the issuance of any permit for commencing any work, including site preparation. An up -front deposit of $10,000 in addition to any required plan check fees shall be submitted at the time of submitting such studies, reports, plans or analysis for the City to draw upon to cover the City's cost of hiring the appropriate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 expert or specialist, if necessary, to review these submittals for adequacy. Any amount of the deposit not used would be returned to the permittee, and any additional costs the City spends over $10,000 shall be reimbursed by the permittee. SECTION 3. PUBLIC SAFETY 1. The site shall be enclosed by a solid masonry or concrete wall with solid gates during all operations, protecting both against public entry, observation and attraction. A chain link fence to provide security is acceptable only through. the exploratory phase. 2. Security personnel shall be employed at all times during the drilling stage (24 hours) and emergency phone numbers shall be posted during production Phase II 3. Signs warning of unauthorized entry and safety hazards shall be posted on all sides. 4. Access to facilities shall be limited to authorized personnel only. 5. Trees shall be maintained at a distance from all walls to prohibit children and others from unauthorized entry. 6. All site personnel shall be instructed on required safety procedures if hydrogen sulfide concentrations are encountered. Documentation of training and instruction shall be made available to the City Personnel Director. 7. Both solid and liquid wastes shall be sampled and tested to determine if it needs to be treated as a hazardous waste. 8. An Oil Spill Prevention Control Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan and an Oil Drilling Contingency Plan will be prepared for the project and approved by the State Division of Oil and Gas, and the City of Hermosa Beach Fire and Building and Safety Departments. 9. Drillsite and production facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the State seismic standards, and designed in accordance with U.B.C. seismic requirements for hazardous facilities. 10. A soils engineering report and engineering geology report prepared by a licensed geologist and engineer shall be prepared and reviewed in conjunction with the plans for all physical improvements. Said report shall address potential seismic hazards, such as liquefaction, due to soils or geologic conditions. All recommendations contained in said reports shall be incorporated in the construction documents. 11. An emergency response plan, including a blowout prevention and control plan, shall be prepared for review and approval 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 by the Division of Oil and Gas and the Hermosa Beach Fire Department. 12. When a leak or spill occurs, it shall be contained, the fluid shall be recovered and the area restored to its original condition. SECTION 4. FIRE SAFETY 1. Adequate fire detection and fighting equipment and supplies, approved by the Fire Department, shall be maintained on the drillsite and tank production facility at all times. 2. A supplementary analysis by a professional consultant shall be provided detailing any necessary improvements the Fire Department may need to prevent, and to halt oil related fires and shall also include the following: public notification, warning and evacuation plan. 3. Oil sumps, drip pans, etc. shall be cleaned at regular intervals to reduce fire hazards and prevent minor spills. 4. Oily rags, paper and miscellaneous waste shall be disposed of in an appropriate manner to reduce fire hazards. 5. Signs warning of flammable fluids and prohibiting smoking shall be installed where appropriate. 6. The drillsite and production facility shall be protected by automatic fire detection sensors and suppression systems. The fire supression systems shall include a tank -cooling sprinkler system. 7. Drilling operations shall be conducted in accordance with appropriate Division of Oil and Gas regulations and shall utilize all required blowout prevention equipment and safety devices. 8. Fire flows to service the operation shall meet Fire Department requirements. 9. All equipment necessary to contain an oil fire or blowout shall be provided and/or maintained on site and all fire personnel shall be trained on its use. SECTION 5. SUBSIDENCE 1. Analysis shall be reviewed by an independent reservoir engineer hired by the City of Hermosa Beach and paid for by the oil driller. 2. The engineer's focus shall deal with the issue of settlement of land within the limits of the oil field and area outside the limit of the oil field and as a result of the driller's operation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. The engineer shall determine and submit a plan showing the potential zone of influence for all soil settlement. Settlement readings shall be measured to 0.01 feet at any control point. 4. The adjacent area shall be surveyed a minimum of 1,000 feet from the zone of influence boundary as determined above. To determine the existing ground surface elevations, an elevation control survey shall be done before the drilling begins and shall be used as a base of reference. 5. The operator shall prepare a plan outlining the method to monitor subsidence as well as any corrective measures for settlements in excess of 0.10 feet. The plan shall be approved by and independent engineer and approved by the Director of Public works. 6. There shall be an annual elevation survey for the project area to monitor and evaluate any potential settlement. If the survey data indicates subsidence, then the driller shall take such action as provided in the subsidence control plan as approved by the Director of Public Works, which shall include a program for more frequent monitoring, and shall include monitoring subsidence along the pipeline route. SECTION 6. VEHICLE TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION ON AND OFF SITE 1. All truck deliveries shall be limited to daylight hours (9:00 AM - 3:00 PM), Monday through Friday, except for an emergency situation, as defined by this C.U.P. and reported to the City in accordance with the notification requirement, which have been reported to the Director of Public Works 'in advance of the delivery. 2. Operation of earthmoving equipment shall be limited to daytime hours between 8 AM and 6 PM. 3. Equipment deliveries shall be made only during daytime hours between 9 AM and 3 PM. 4. Project related truck travel shall be restricted to specific truck routes and access points to be reviewed by the Public Works Department and ultimately reviewed and approved by the Commission. Unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission, both incoming and outgoing traffic is to be routed on Valley Boulevard south of the subject site via Herondo Avenue, requiring a temporary change of Valley Drive into a two-way street during the exploration and drilling phase of the project. 5. Signs shall be installed to direct detour traffic as approved by the Public Works Director. 6. The number of truck trips shall be limited to a maximum of 18 round trips per day, except in an emergency, as defined by this C.U.P. and reported to the City in accordance with the notification requirement. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. Maintenance Yard site access shall be designed to enable trucks to turn into the site without inhibiting traffic movement on Valley Drive or Sixth Street. 8. Minor curb radii reconstruction shall be done by the operator as determined by the City Public Works depending on the: length and necessary turning radii for project related trucks. 9. Area residents shall be notified of pipeline construction prior to commencement. Signs shall be installed to direct detour traffic. 10. All trucks arriving or departing the drill site shall be washed to prevent spillage of earth and all routes shall be swept and/or washed by the driller as required by the City. 11. An evaluation of the structural condition of the existing pavement shall be performed by a soils engineer on all access streets and the proposed truck routes prior to commencing any site preparation or construction and prior to the issuance of any necessary permits. The evaluation shall include as a minimum: a) the number, type, size and weight of trucks for export of materials or product, b) the number, type, size and weight of truck deliveries of building supplies, drilling supplies etc., c) the number, type, size and weight of equipment transported to the site, d) other associated transportation items, e) other anticipated loading. The evaluation shall contain recommendations as to actions required to maintain said streets and routes'in their current' condition throughout the planned development phase, planned production phase, and in the close out phase. 12. The operator shall perform the actions on the existing pavement as recommended by the soils or highway engineer, the operator will hire a licensed contractor and provide street profiles, drawings, and engineering to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department prior to work being commenced. 13. The City Council may restrict the use of certain street, alleys, or roadways in connection with the permittee's operations. In the event any street, alley or roadway is damaged by the permittee's operations, such damages shall be paid for by the permittee upon demand by the City, and the failure to pay such damages, being the reasonable cost of the repair of any such damaged portions, shall be grounds for the revocation of the permit and the collection of such damages. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 7. SANITARY SEWER 1. Use of the sanitary sewer is prohibited, except for the minimal use associated with the office and restroom facilities. Any water from oil production shall be disposed in the 5 disposal wells SECTION 8. NOISE/VIBRATION 1. The entire drilling operation shall be equipped with acoustical treatment for noise to be within the standards set forth in the City's Oil Ordinance. a. A sound attenuation wall of 30 -feet in height shall be provided along the perimeter of site as -shown on plans during oil drilling phases. 2. Heavy/large reciprocating equipment shall be mounted ons vibration isolators. 3. Pumping units shall be maintained to eliminate noise from worn parts. 4. The drilling rig shall be acoustically wrapped and/or paneled including the ancillary and support equipment to meet the requirements of the noise ordinance. 5. Tripping will be restricted to daylight hours only. 6. Loudspeaker paging systems shall be prohibited. 7. Well workover rigs or any other rig that is used shall be operated only between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. during daytime weekday hours only, excluding holidays, except in an emergency, as defined by this C.U.P. and reported to the City in accordance with the notification requirement. The exhaust and intake of the diesel engine (if used on the workover rig) shall be muffled to reduce noise to an acceptable limit. The operator shall use whatever means necessary, including but not limited to, enclosing the diesel engine and rig in acoustic blankets or housing... 8. All oil maintenance equipment, vehicles and non -electrical motors shall be equipped with manufacturer approved mufflers or housed in a sound -proofing device. 9. Noise monitoring shall be conducted under the supervision of an independent certified acoustical engineer paid for by the permittee. Reports shall be submitted to the Planning Director within three working days after the completion of each phase of the monitoring. The monitoring shall include the following: a. Pre -drilling phase monitoring. Prior to the start of the drilling phase, noise measurements shall be obtained during the operation of the specific drilling rig which has been selected and the measurements shall be related 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to those experienced at the the nearest residential boundaries to the drilling site. In addition, the noise control measures which have been (or will be) applied to the rig as needed for compliance with the City of Hermosa Beach noise ordinances shall be identified. b. Start of Drilling. Noise measurements shall be obtained during the nighttime hours (10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M) for at least six hours on each of the three nights within the five day period from the start of the drilling phase. Monitoring is to occur at the nearest residential boundary to the actual drilling operation. c. During the drilling phase. Noise monitoring shall occur during a six -hour period between the hours from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. at least once each month during the drilling phase of the project. The noise level data obtained shall be compared to the City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinance standards by the Planning Department. Where an exceedence of the standards is identified, noise control measures shall be required. d. Production phase. Noise measurements shall be obtained during a six -hour period between the hours from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. at least once each year during the production and completion phase. SECTION 9. LANDSCAPING 1. A Detailed Landscape Plan for Phase I (exploratory and testing) and Phase II, indicating the type, size and quantity of plant materials shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval, and it shall be consistent with the conceptual landscape plan reviewed by the Planning Commission, and shall comply with Section 21A-2.9 of the Oil Code. 2. During Phase I, test facility, landscaping consisting of 24". box, or larger size trees may be installed without permanent planting. 3. Minimum 24" boxed trees for Phase I and II shall be adequate in size to create a buffer effect to obscure visibility of oil production activity. Permanent trees planted around the perimeter of the site for Phase II shall be a minimum sixteen (16) feet high at planting. 4. Trees along the lot perimeter shall be provided to create a dense landscape buffer to the satisfaction and field review of the Planning Director. 5. The aesthetic impact of the exposed masonry walls on the west and northern sides shall be softened with the planting of climbing vines to the satisfaction and field review of the Planning Director. 6. Landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean. 1 condition. 2 7. A complete automatic sprinkler system shall be provided prior to commencement of Phase II. 3 SECTION 10. AESTHETICS 4 1. The tanks, acoustical wrap and wall, and production facility 5 shall be painted a neutral color to blend in with the surroundings; color shall be reviewed and approved by the 6 Planning Commission/ 7 2. The use of architectural lighting beyond safety and security requirements shall be prohibited. 8 3. The site for drilling equipment and the storage facilities 9 shall be depressed in combination with walls so that the visual impact is minimized. 10 4. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded and directed inward of 11 both sites. 12 5. Lighting shall be limited solely to the amount and intensities necessary for safety and security purposes. 13 6. Certain activities which might involve unshielded lighting 14 (i.e., site preparation and restoration) activities shall be limited to daylight hours and thus not require nighttime 15 lighting. NoN 16 7. A split -face block wall maintained graffiti free of a minimum: of 12 feet in height shall be provided; wall materials shall 17 be reviewed and approved by Planning Director. During test drilling minimum 6' high fencing shall be provided. 18 8. The height of the site's perimeter wall shall be increased to 19 at least 16 feet if beam pumping units taller. than 12 feet are installed, or if perimeter trees, when planted for Phase 20 II, are not a minimum of sixteen (16) feet in height when installed. 21 9. Tanks shall be submerged 6 to 8 feet or more below grade and 22 will be adjacent to the 12 -foot high privacy wall. 23 10. If the drill derrick remains idle for more than one year, review and approval by the City Planning Commission or City 24 Council shall be required, or the derrick shall be dismantled at the expense of the operator. 25 11. All production equipment and structures shall be painted to 26 blend with the surrounding environment with review and approval by the Planning Director. 27 12. On-site signs shall be limited to those needed for public 28 health and safety. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13. All derricks masts hereafter erected for drilling, re -drilling or remedial operations or for use in production operations shall be removed within 45 days after completion of the work unless otherwise ordered by the Division of Oil and Gas of the state. 14. The operator shall diligently and continuously pursue drilling operations until the all 30 oil wells and all five (5) water disposal wells are completed or abandoned to the satisfaction of the Division of Oil and Gas of the state and upon completion or abandonment shall remove all drilling equipment from the drill site within 45 days following completion or abandonment of the well unless otherwise ordered by the Division of Oil and Gas. SECTION 11. ODORS/VAPOR/AIR POLLUTION 1. A vapor recovery system shall be installed to recover 99% of hydrocarbon emissions during storage and transfer of crude oil. 2. Raw gas shall not be allowed into the atmosphere. 3. Gas andvapordetection systems shall be installed at appropriate locations. 4. All project site activities shall be conducted such as to eliminate escape of gas in accordance with best available control technology and practices which shall be reviewed and approved by the City. 5. All requirements of AQMD shall be met at all times. 6. A state-of-the-art scrubber shall be employed for the exploratory phase to eliminate odors from waste gases, and any flame shall be enclosed. 7. Tanks shall be designed and located so that no odors or fumes can be detected from the adjacent areas outside the exterior walls of the project. 8. Operators shall not blow lines to the atmosphere, except in an emergency, as defined by this C.U.P. and reported to the City in accordance with the notification requirement. 9. Construction equipment and vehicles shall be maintained in proper tune. 10. Odorless drilling muds shall be used. 11. Well tubing and rods shall not remain out of the well during workover operations less than 8 -hours. The tubing will be surface washed with a detergent solution to remove odor bearing residual hydrocarbons if exposed longer than 8 -hours. 12. Odor control will be further enforced by the SCAQMD under Rules 402, 466, and 466.1 of their regulations, and the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 commercial recovery system shall be employed for the permanent facility. 13. There shall be no open flames allowed 14. The permittee shall monitor drilling mud during drilling on the site for odorous substances and take such measures to eliminate any odor which would be perceptible outside the drill site. 15. The permittee shall undertake no refining process or any process for the extraction of products from natural gas, except for such minor processed as necessary to make natural gas acceptable to the City gas mains for domestic use. 16. Well cellars shall be maintained in a clean and efficient manner to prevent waste accumulation and shall be frequently steam cleaned. 17. The operator shall compensate the City for the staff time for one employee each from the Fire Department, Public Works Department, Building and Safety Department, and Planning Department to obtain AQMD training to assist in the detection and observation of the potential air quality violations. SECTION 12. GRADING/STORM WATER/SITE RUNOFF 1. Grading shall not be performed when wind speeds exceed 20mph. The contractor shall maintain a wind speed monitoring device, on site during grading operations. The contractor shall continually keep the soil moist during grading operations. At no time shall any dust be allowed to leave the work site./ 2. Normal wetting procedures shall be employed during grading. Reviewed and approval of procedure shall be by Public Works Director. 3. Graded surfaces shall be paved or landscaped per approved plan. 4. Project site shall be graded so that all contaminated runoff is collected and treated on-site and disposed of according to all laws. 5. Site shall be graded in a manner so that all hazardous or contaminated fluids and runoff are directed toward a cellar and approved pit and disposed of properly. 6. No water from the site shall be allowed to enter the storm drainage system or any public area. 7. No water from the site shall be allowed to surface flow across the public beach. SECTION 13. PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. The pipeline operators shall adhere to all applicable federal, state, regional, and local statutes governing design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the pipelines and related equipment. 2. A detailed pipeline survey shall be conducted in order to locate existing pipelines prior to excavation for pipeline construction. 3. A responsible agent paid for by the applicant shall be present during excavations. 4. Areas of construction and maintenance activities shall be delineated by signs, flagmen, pavement markings, barricades, and lights, as determined by permit requirements of all local agencies. 5. Where pedestrian activities are affected during construction, appropriate warning signs shall be installed and pedestrians will be diverted. Pedestrian access to businesses and residences will be maintained during construction. Special facilities, such as handrails, fences, and walkways shall be provided, if necessary, for the safety of pedestrians. --- 6. Obstruction of emergency vehicle operations will be partially mitigated by ensuring that providers of emergency services are kept informed of the location, nature, and duration of construction activities so alternate routes can be chosen. It is essential that fire department access is maintained to all buildings adjacent to construction activities. For this reason, a minimum of at least one lane for streets undergoing construction will be kept open at all times, and fire hydrants in construction areas will remain accessible. 7. If public transit stops along pipeline routes need to be temporarily relocated during construction, the applicant shall coordinate with the appropriate local operators to provide signs directing riders to the temporary stop locations. 8. When hauling excavated and waste materials from construction sites, substandard roadways will be avoided and local jurisdiction regulations governing hauling vehicles will be adhered to. 9. Pipeline construction and operation of earth moving equipment shall be limited to daylight hours between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM and shall not be permitted during weekend periods. Additionally, construction -related trucks should not be operated during peak traffic hours of 7 to 9 AM and 3 to 7 PM. Pipeline construction at major intersections shall be limited to daylight hours between 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM to avoid peak traffic periods. 10. Equipment deliveries shall be made only during daytime hours between 8 AM and 3 PM. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11. In order to reduce visual impacts and possible safety hazards, storage of pipes and other materials, as well as construction equipment, shall not be permitted on any street during non -construction hours. 12. Area residents within 300' shall be notified about the pipeline construction operation prior to commencement of - construction. 13. Detour signs on pipeline construction routes shall. be placed at appropriate locations. 14. Steel plates covering pipeline excavation trenches shall be placed to permit traffic movement during non -construction hours. 15. Pipelines shall be designed with ample safety factors, pressure -tested prior to being placed in operation, and monitored for corrosion once in operation. 16. Safety shut -down devices that respond to drops in pipeline pressure shall be incorporated into the project in order to stop the flow of the pipeline contents in case of a pipeline rupture. 17. Groundwater level and land subsidence shall be monitored to$ insure that pipeline damage does not occur as a result of geologic and hydrologic phenomena. The annual subsidence survey shall include a report to the City on monitoring efforts to insure pipeling damage has not occurred. 18. Pipeline construction along Valley Drive shall be approved by the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of a permit.° 19. Pipeline construction shall not occur in the area known as the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt. 20. Storage of materials shall not be allowed on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt. The storage or dumping upon the greenbelt of any materials, construction equipment, debris, oil drilling equipment, drilling rigs, piping, etc..,_and any and all equipment and vehicles necessary for the the construction and maintenance of the pipeline and oil development site shall be prohibited. The use of the greenbelt as a staging area for construction of the oil facility or pipeline shall be be prohibited. There shall be no parking or standing of any vehicles on the greenbelt for any time period. 21. Trenches shall be covered during non -working hours to minimize traffic circulation problems. SECTION 14 Definition and notification requirements for emergency situations: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. For purposes of this Conditional Use Permit, "Emergency" is defined as follows: A threat to the health and safety of persons in the surrounding area to the drill site and the following conditions which require immediate action: A. Conditions which could lead to a potential spill or well blowout: 1. Entry of oil and gas into the wellbore while drilling, tripping or out of the hole which may be indicated by one or more of the following: a. Pit volume gain b. Well flowing with pumps off c. Flow rate increases with circulation d. Improper hole fill -up on trips e. Sudden increase in drilling rate f. Pump pressure decreases and pump rate increases g. Decrease in returning mud rate h. Sloughing shale i. Changes in mud salinity and/or mud flow properties 2. Lost circulation or loss of ability to circulate 3. Casing or wellhead failure while drilling 4. Stuck pipe and/or equipment during any of the following operations: a. Drilling b. Tripping drill pipe and tools c. Wireline logging d. Drill stem testing e. Running casing f. Perforating and stimulating completion interval 5. Loss of rig power or equipment failure while drilling or tripping. B. Injuries to personnel at the Drill Site C. Conditionswhich could reduce the stability and safety of the rig and production equipment: 1. Natural events: a. Excessive winds, rain and lightning b. Floods c. Subsidence d. Earthquakes 2. Other events: 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a. Riots/Demonstrations b. Fire II. Notification Required: In the case of an emergency, as defined above, the permittee shall give immediate notice to the City of the occurrence of the emergency event. The City will provide a list of phone numbers. A written notice, including a detailed description of the emergency condition, and the actions taken and/or proposed to be taken to correct the situation, shall be provided within 24 hours of the occurrence of the emergency event. SECTION 15 1. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of both properties involved have filed at the office of the Department of Planning their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. 2. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department.- , 3. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and;if any of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. 4. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City,. its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers,or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the_ City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the perittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. a. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in .the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. b. The permittee shall provide a cash bond to the City, in the amount of $50,000, to be used by the City towards Attorneys costs in the event of litigation. This conditional use permit shall not be in full force and effect until this cash bond is submitted. - 17 - - Z3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. SECTION 16 The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject project. The Planning Commission shall review, and if necessary, modify the conditions as set forth in this Conditional Use Permit on an annual basis or upon change in the operator of the project. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this Conditional Use Permit if any violation of these conditions or the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code occurs. The City shall provide the operator with notice in writing of any violation, stating the City's basis for determining that a violation has occurred. The operator shall have a reasonable time to abate the violation before further action is taken. The City may require the operator with notice in writing to submit written documentation of actions taken to remedy any violation and may require monitoring or other procedures to be implemented in order to ensure that the violation will be abated. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1993, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of _the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY p/ccrsoilp 8/5/93 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 93 - (STAFF RECOMMENDED) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OIL DEVELOPMENT AT THE CITY MAINTENANCE YARD, 555 6TH STREET, AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN OIL PIPELINE ALONG VALLEY DRIVE FROM SIXTH STREET SOUTH TO HERONDO STREET WHEREAS, on May 8, 1990, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the project, thereby complying withthe requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act in review of this project; WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR for the project; WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on July 13, 1993, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to receive oral and written testimony regarding ,this matter and again held a public meeting on August 10, 1993, to consider the Planning Commission response and recommendation to modifications and made the following findings: A. The site is zoned M-1 and is suitable for the type and density of the proposed development; B. Design of the proposed project is compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City's General Plan, the zoning ordinance, and the Oil Code, and implements the mitigations measures, where applicable, as set forth in the Certified EIR; C. An Environmental Impact Report has been adopted and certified by the City and the proposed project with the incorporation of mitigating conditions below, which include the approved 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 mitigation measures contained in the EIR, will eliminate or reduce identified environmental impacts to an acceptable level; D. Any remaining unavoidable adverse environmental impacts are overridden by the benefits of the project as set forth in the adopted Statement of Overriding Considerations; E. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Addenda with the Final EIR to the project prior to making its decision on the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve an oil development project and the construction of an oil pipeline, subject to the following conditions: SECTION 1. GENERAL 1. The testing phase for all production shall be a maximum of one year from the date drilling is initiated. 2. If the project cannot comply with operation standards established by these conditions of approval, after two warnings the operation shall be subject to fines and/or shut down through permit revocation by the City, except in regard to noise, if it is determined that a diligent effort is being made, and a plan has been provided, reviewed and approved by the City Council 3. A minimum of one annual site audit shall takeplace to inspect for soil contamination as a result ofaccidental spills in any areas not paved and exposed. Auditor shall be hired by City. 4. The maximum number of days the workover rigs or any other rig that is to be used on-site shall be 90 days per year, and shall be operated weekdays 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. excluding holidays. 5. In the event that a residence with solar panels is affected by shading, a site specific study paid for by the oil contractor shall be conducted to determine economic impact. 6. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 3180 the operation shall be monitored for all conditions of the approval of which the City has responsibility which includes (but not limited to) noise monitoring and inspection of the site for proper maintenance. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. The proposed plans shall be submitted to the division of oil and gas for their review and recommendation; a. Any recommendation by the Division shall be taken into consideration prior to approval, and may be included as conditions of approval. 8. Drill cuttings and other wastes, shall be collected in above ground containers and disposed of at an approved disposal site. Receipts for all disposal of waste product shall be provided within ten (10) days of disposal to the Public Works Director. 9. All requirements, standards, conditions stated within the Oil Production Code, Chapter 21-A, of the City's Municipal Code shall be met, unless more restrictive requirements are imposed through mitigation measures; where it cannot be clearly determined whether the City's Oil Ordinance, Chapter 21-A or mitigation measures are more stringent, the appropriate City staff shall make a determination; appealable to the City Council. 10. Three (3) copies of final building plans including site, elevation, and floor plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. 11. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance - with submitted plans. Any minor modification shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Planning Director. 12. All wells must be drilled and completed within 55`months from the start of drilling of the first exploratory well in accordance with the following schedule: EXPLORATION AND TEST PHASE 12 MONTHS (Initial construction, Drilling rig erection, exploratory drilling, production testing) CONSTRUCTION PHASE 9 MONTHS (Permanent facility construction) DRILLING PHASE 34 MONTHS (Development Drilling, 1 month per well) SECTION 2. LAND USE DEVELOPMENT 1. The maximum size for any storage tank of any type shall be forty feet in diameter and sixteen feet in height, appurtenances not included. 2. Prior to construction and prior to obtaining building permits for oil production, a complete soil analysis shall be performed and approved by all applicable governing agencies having jurisdiction over the project. 3. Not more than five tanks shall be installed, and shall be submerged in a concrete basin which contains 10% above the volume required by the State Division of Oil and Gas and the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Uniform Fire Code which is as follows: The volumetric capacity of the diked area shall not be less than the greatest amount of liquid that can be released from the larges tank within the diked area. The capacity of the diked areas enclosing more than one tank shall be calculated by deducting the volume of the tanks other than the largest tank below the height of the dike. 4. All wells shall be drilled and cemented in accordance with State Division of Oil and Gas regulations to protect underground aquifers. 5. Except for the drill rig and drawworks, no equipment or appurtenant structures shall exceed 16 feet in height from. grade as defined by the Oil Code. 6. The electrical service systems shall be designed with sufficient capacity to minimize surging impacts. 7. The well cellars shall be concrete lined and shall be designed to hold contaminated run-off from on-site sources; or a sump shall be provided. 8. Solid state control console linked to a control system to perform energy conservation functions such as start/stop time programming of motor equipment, data logging of energy consumption and maintenance and service scheduling shall be provided. a. All Electrical machinery where possible shall have a minimum coefficient of efficiency of 0.75. 9. Parking shall be provided on the site consistent with the submitted parking plan to provide adequate parking facilities for all workers involved in oil recovery operations, including exploratory and production phases. 10. All studies, reports, plans and analysis required by any section of this C.U.P. or required by law shall be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the issuance of any permit for commencing any work, including site. preparation. An up -front deposit of $10,000 in addition to any required plan check fees shall be submitted at the time of submitting such studies, reports, plans or analysis for the City to draw upon to cover the City's cost of hiring the appropriate expert or specialist, if necessary, to review these submittals for _. adequacy. Any amount of the deposit not used would be returned to the permittee, and any additional costs the City spends over $10,000 shall be reimbursed by the permittee. SECTION 3. PUBLIC SAFETY 1. The site shall be enclosed by a solid masonry or concrete wall with solid gates during all operations, protecting both against public entry, observation and attraction. A chain 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 link fence to provide security is acceptable only through_;the exploratory phase. 2. Security personneL shall be employed at all times during the drilling stage (24 hours) and emergency phone numbers shall be posted during production Phase II 3. Signs warning of unauthorized entry and safety hazards shall be posted on all sides. 4. Access to facilities shall be limited to authorized personnel only. 5. Trees shall be maintained at a distance from all walls to prohibit children and others from unauthorized entry. 6. All site personnel shall be instructed on required safety procedures if hydrogen sulfide concentrations are encountered. Documentation of training and instruction shall be made available to the City Personnel Director. 7. Both solid and liquid wastes shall be sampled and tested to determine if it needs to be treated as a hazardous waste.. 8. An Oil Spill Prevention Control Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan and an Oil Drilling Contingency Plan will be prepared for the project and approved by the State Division of Oiltand Gas, and the City of Hermosa Beach Fire and Building and Safety Departments. 9. Drillsite and production facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the State seismic standards, and designed in accordance with U.B.C. seismic requirements for hazardous facilities. 10. A soils engineering report and engineering geology report prepared by a licensed geologist and engineer shall be prepared and reviewed in conjunction with the. plans for all physical improvements. Said report shall address potential seismic hazards, such as liquefaction, due to soils or geologic conditions. All recommendations contained in said reports shall be incorporated in the construction documents. 11. An emergency response plan, including a blowout prevention and control plan, shall be prepared for review and approval by the Division of Oil and Gas and the Hermosa Beach Fire Department. 12. When a leak or spill occurs, it shall be contained, the fluid shall be recovered and the area restored to its original condition. SECTION 4. FIRE SAFETY 1. Adequate fire detection and fighting equipment and supplies, approved by the Fire Department, shall be maintained on the drillsite and tank production facility at all times. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. A supplementary analysis by a professional consultant shall be provided detailing any necessary improvements the Fire Department may need to prevent, and to halt oil related fires and shall also include the following: public notification, warning and evacuation plan. 3. Oil sumps, drip pans, etc. shall be cleaned at regular intervals to reduce fire hazards and prevent minor spills. 4. Oily rags, paper and miscellaneous waste shall be disposed of in an appropriate manner to reduce fire hazards. 5. Signs warning of flammable fluids and prohibiting smoking shall be installed where appropriate. 6. The drillsite and production facility shall be protected by automatic fire detection sensors and suppression systems. The fire supression systems shall include a tank -cooling sprinkler system. 7. Drilling operations shall be conducted in accordance with appropriate Division of Oil and Gas regulations and shall utilize all required blowout prevention equipment and safety devices. 8. Fire flows to service the operation shall meet Fire Department requirements. 9. All equipment necessary to contain an oil fire or blowout shall be provided and/or maintained on site and all fire personnel shall be trained on its use. SECTION 5. SUBSIDENCE 1. Analysis shall be reviewed by an independent reservoir engineer hired by the City of Hermosa Beach and paid for by the oil driller. 2. The engineer's focus shall deal with the issue of settlement of land within the limits of the oil field and area outside the limit of the oil field and as a result of the driller's operation. 3. The engineer shall determine and submit a plan showing the potential zone of influence for all soil settlement. Settlement readings shall be measured to 0.01 feet at any control point. 4. The adjacent area shall be surveyed a minimum of 1,000 feet from the zone of influence boundary as determined above. To determine the existing ground surface elevations, an elevation control survey shall be done before the drilling begins and shall be used as a base of reference. 5. The operator shall prepare a plan outlining the method to monitor subsidence as well as any corrective measures for settlements in excess of 0.10 feet. The plan shall be 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 approved by and independent engineer and approved by the - Director of Public works. 6. There shall be an annual elevation survey for the project area to monitor and evaluate any potential settlement. If the survey data indicates subsidence, then the driller shall take such action as provided in the subsidence control plan as approved by the Director of Public Works, which shall include a program for more frequent monitoring, and shall include monitoring subsidence along the pipeline route. • SECTION 6. VEHICLE TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION ON AND OFF SITE 1. All truck deliveries shall be limited to daylight hours (9:00 AM - 3:00 PM), Monday through Friday, except for an emergency situation, as defined by this C.U.P. and reported to the City in accordance with the notification requirement, which have been reported to the Director of Public Works in advance of the delivery. 2- _Operation of earthmoving equipment shall be limited to daytime hours between 8 AM and 6 PM. 3. Equipment deliveries shall be made only during daytime hours between 9 AM and 3 PM. 4. Project related truck travel shall be restricted to specific truck routes and access points as approved by the Public 'Works Department. 5. Signs shall be installed to direct detour traffic as approved by the Public Works Director. 6. The number of truck trips shall be limited to a maximum of 18 round trips per day, except in an emergency, as defined by this C.U.P. and reported to the City in accordance with the notification requirement. 7. Maintenance Yard site access shall be designed to enable trucks to turn into the site without inhibiting traffic movement on Valley Drive or Sixth Street. 8. Minor curb radii reconstruction shall be done by the operator as determined by the City Public Works depending on the length and necessary turning radii for project related trucks. 9. Area residents shall be notified of pipeline construction prior to commencement. Signs shall be installed to direct detour traffic. 10. All trucks arriving or departing the drill site shall be washed to prevent spillage of earth and all routes shall be swept and/or washed by the driller as required by the City. 11. An evaluation of the structural condition of the existing pavement shall be performed by a soils engineer on all access 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 streets and the proposed truck routes prior to commencing any site preparation or construction and prior to the issuance of any necessary permits. The evaluation shall include as a minimum: a) the number, type, size and weight of trucks for export of materials or product, b) the number, type, size and weight of truck deliveries of building supplies, drilling supplies etc., the number, type, size and weight of equipment transported to the site, d) other associated transportation items, e) other anticipated loading. The evaluation shall contain recommendations as to actions required to maintain said streets and routes in their current condition throughout the planned development phase, planned production phase, and in the close out phase. 12. The operator shall perform the actions on the existing pavement as recommended by the soils or highway engineer, the operator will hire a licensed contractor and provide street profiles, drawings, and engineering to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department prior to work commencing. 13. The City Council may restrict the use of certain street, alleys, or roadways in connection with the permittee's operations. In the event any street, alley or roadway is damaged by the permittee's operations, such damages shall be paid for by the permittee upon demand by the City, and the failure to pay such damages, being the reasonable cost of the repair of any such damaged portions, shall be grounds for the revocation of the permit and the collection of such damages. SECTION 7. SANITARY SEWER 1. Use of the sanitary sewer is prohibited, exceptfor the minimal use associated with the office and restroom facilities. Any water from oil production shall be disposed in the five disposal wells. SECTION 8. NOISE/VIBRATION 1. The entire drilling operation shall be equipped with acoustical treatment for noise to be within the standards set forth in the City's Oil Ordinance. a. A sound attenuation wall of 30 -feet in height shall be provided along the perimeter of site as shown on plans during oil drilling phases. 2. Heavy/large reciprocating equipment shall be mounted on vibration isolators. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. Pumping units shall be maintained to eliminate noise from worn parts. 4. The drilling rig shall be acoustically wrapped and/or paneled including the ancillary and support equipment to meet the requirements of the noise ordinance. 5. Tripping will be restricted to daylight hours only. 6. Loudspeaker paging systems shall be prohibited. 7. Well workover rigs or any other rig that is used shall be operated only between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. during daytime weekday hours only, excluding holidays, except in an emergency, as defined by this C.U.P. and reported to the City in accordance with the notification requirement. The exhaust and intake of the diesel engine (if used on the workover rig) shall be muffled to reduce noise to an acceptable limit. The operator shall use whatever means necessary, including but not limited to, enclosing the diesel engine and rig in acoustic blankets or housing. 8. All oil maintenance equipment, vehicles and non -electrical motors shall be equipped with manufacturer approved mufflers or housed in a sound -proofing device. 9. Noise monitoring shall be conducted under the supervision of an independent certified acoustical engineer paid for by the permittee. Reports shall be submitted to the Planning Director within three working days after the completion of each phase of the monitoring. The monitoring shall include the following: a. Pre -drilling phase monitoring. Prior to the start of the drilling phase, noise measurements shall be obtained during the operation of the specific drilling rig which has been selected and the measurements shall be related to those experienced at the the nearest residential boundaries to the drilling site. In addition, the noise control measures which have been (or will be) applied to the rig as needed for compliance with the City of Hermosa Beach noise ordinances shall be identified. b. Start of Drilling. Noise measurements shall be obtained during the nighttime hours (10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M) for at least six hours on each of the three nights within the five day period from the start of the drilling phase. Monitoring is to occur at the nearest residential boundary to the actual drilling operation. c. During the drilling phase. Noise monitoring shall occur during a six -hour period between the hours from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. at least once each month during the drilling phase of the project. The noise level data obtained shall be compared to the City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinance standards by the Planning Department. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Where an exceedence of the standards is identified, noise control measures shall be required. d. Production phase. Noise measurements shall be obtained during a six -hour period between the hours from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. at least once each year during the production and completion phase. SECTION 9. LANDSCAPING 1. A Detailed Landscape Plan for Phase I (exploratory and testing) and Phase II, indicating the type, size and quantity of plant materials shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval, and it shall be consistent with the conceptual landscape plan reviewed by the Planning Commission, and shall comply with Section 21A-2.9 of the Oil Code. it t- 2. During Phase I, test facility, landscaping consisting of 24" box, or larger size trees may be installed without permanent planting. 3. Minimum 24" boxed trees for Phase I and II shall be adequate in size to create a buffer effect to obscure visibility of oil production activity. Permanent trees planted around the perimeter of the site for Phase II shall be a minimum sixteen (16) feet high at planting. 4. Trees along the lot perimeter shall be provided to create a dense landscape buffer to the satisfaction and field review of the Planning Director. 5. The aesthetic impact of the exposed masonry walls on the west and northern sides shall be softened with the planting of climbing vines to the satisfaction and field review of the Planning Director. 6. Landscaping shall be maintained in a neat andclean condition. 7. A complete automatic sprinkler system shall be provided prior to commencement of Phase II. SECTION 10. AESTHETICS 1. The tanks, acoustical wrap and wall, and production facility shall be painted a neutral color to blend in with the surroundings; color shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission/ 2. The use of architectural lighting beyond safety and security requirements shall be prohibited. 3. The site for drilling equipment and the storage facilities shall be depressed in combination with walls so that the visual impact is minimized. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 '13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 -21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded and directed inward of both sites. 5. Lighting shall be limited solely to the amount and intensities necessary for safety and security purposes. 6. Certain activities which might involve unshielded lighting (i.e., site preparation and restoration) activities shall be limited to daylight hours and thus not require nighttime lighting. 7. A split -face block wall maintained graffiti free of a.minimum of 12 feet in height shall be provided; wall materials shall be reviewed and approved by Planning Director. During test drilling minimum 6' high fencing shall be provided. 8. The height of the site's perimeter wall shall be increased to at least 16 feet if beam pumping units taller than 12 feet are installed, or if perimeter trees, when planted for Phase II, are not a minimum of sixteen (16) feet in height when installed. 9:. Tanks shall be submerged 6 to 8 feet or more below grade and will be adjacent to the 12 -foot high privacy wall. 10. If the drill derrick remains idle for more than::one year, review and approval by the City Planning Commission or City Council shall be required, or the derrick shall be dismantled at the expense of the operator. 11. All production equipment and structures shall be painted to blend with the surrounding environment with reviewiand approval by the Planning Director. 12. On-site signs shall be limited to those needed for public health and safety. 13. All derricks masts hereafter erected for drilling, re -drilling or remedial operations or for use'in production operations shall be removed within 45 days after completion of the work unless otherwise ordered by the Division of Oil and Gas of the state. 14. The operator shall diligently and continuously pursue drilling operations until the all 30 oil wells and all five (5) water disposal wells are completed or abandoned to the satisfaction of the Division of Oil and Gas of the state and upon completion or abandonment shall remove all drilling equipment from the drill site within 45 days following completion or abandonment of the well unless otherwise ordered by the Division of Oil and Gas. SECTION 11. ODORS/VAPOR/AIR POLLUTION 1. A vapor recovery system shall be installed to recover 99% of hydrocarbon emissions during storage and transfer of crude oil. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Raw gas shall not be allowed into the atmosphere. 3. Gas and vapor detection systems shall be installed at appropriate locations. 4. All project site activities shall be conducted such as to eliminate escape of gas in accordance with best available control technology and practices which shall be reviewed and approved by the City. 5. All requirements of AQMD shall be met at all times. 6. A state-of-the-art scrubber shall be employed for the exploratory phase to eliminate odors from waste gases, and any flame shall be enclosed. 7. Tanks shall be designed and located so that no odors or fumes can be detected from the adjacent areas outside the exterior walls of the project. 8. Operators shall not blow lines to the atmosphere, except in an emergency, as defined by this C.U.P. and reported to the City in accordance with the notification requirement. 9. Construction equipment and vehicles shall be maintained in proper tune. 10. Odorless drilling muds shall be used. 11. Well tubing and rods shall not remain out of the well during workover operations less than 8 -hours. The tubing will be surface washed with a detergent solution to remove,odor bearing residual hydrocarbons if exposed longer than 8 -hours. 12. Odor control will be further enforced by the SCAQMD under Rules 402, 466, and 466.1 of their regulations, and the commercial recovery system shall be employed for the permanent facility. 13. There shall be no open flames allowed 14. The permittee shall monitor drilling mud during drilling on the site for odorous substances and take such measures to eliminate any odor which would be perceptible outside the drill site. 15. The permittee shall undertake no refining process or any process for the extraction of products from natural gas, except for such minor processed as necessary to make natural gas acceptable to the City gas mains for domestic use. 16. Well cellars shall be maintained in a clean and efficient manner to prevent waste accumulation and shall be frequently steam cleaned. SECTION 12. GRADING/STORM WATER/SITE RUNOFF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Grading shall not be performed when wind speeds exceed 20mph. The contractor shall maintain a wind speed monitoring device on site during grading operations. The contractor shall continually keep the soil moist during grading operations. At no time shall any dust be allowed to leave the work site. 2. Normal wetting procedures shall be employed during grading. Reviewed and approval of procedure shall be by Public Works Director. 3. Graded surfaces shall be paved or landscaped per approved plan. 4. Project site shall be graded so that all contaminated runoff is collected and treated on-site and disposed of according to all laws. 5. Site shall be graded in a manner so that all hazardous or contaminated fluids and runoff are directed toward a cellar and approved pit and disposed of properly. 6. No water from the site shall be allowed to enter the storm drainage system or any public area. 7. No water from the site shall be allowed to surface flow across the public beach. SECTION 13. PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION 1. The pipeline operators shall adhere to all applicable federal, state, regional, and local statutes governing design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the pipelines and related equipment. 2. A detailed pipeline survey shall be conducted in order to locate existing pipelines prior to excavation for pipeline construction. 3. A responsible agent paid for by the applicant shall be present during excavations. 4. Areas of construction and maintenance activities shall be delineated by signs, flagmen, pavement markings, barricades, and lights, as determined by permit requirements of all local agencies. 5. Where pedestrian activities are affected during construction, appropriate warning signs shall be installed and pedestrians will be diverted. Pedestrian access to businesses and residences will be maintained during construction. Special facilities, such as handrails, fences, and walkways shall be provided, if necessary, for the safety of pedestrians. 6. Obstruction of emergency vehicle operations will be partially mitigated by ensuring that providers of emergency services are kept informed of the location, nature, and duration of construction activities so alternate routes can be chosen. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is essential that fire department access is maintained to all buildings adjacent to construction activities. For this reason, a minimum of at least one lane for streets undergoing construction will be kept open at all times, and fire hydrants in construction areas will remain accessible. 7. If public transit stops along pipeline routes need to.be temporarily relocated during construction, the applicant shall coordinate with the appropriate local operators to provide signs directing riders to the temporary stop locations. 8. When hauling excavated and waste materials from construction sites, substandard roadways will be avoided and local jurisdiction regulations governing hauling vehicles will be - adhered to. 9. Pipeline construction and operation of earth moving equipment shall be limited to daylight hours between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM and shall not be permitted during weekend periods. Additionally, construction -related trucks should not be operated during peak traffic hours of 7 to 9 AM and 3 to 7 PM. Pipeline construction at major intersections shall be limited to daylight hours between 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM to avoid peak traffic periods. 10. Equipment deliveries shall be made only during daytime hours between 8 AM and 3 PM. 11. In order to reduce visual impacts and possible safety hazards, storage of pipes and other materials, as well as construction equipment, shall not be permitted on any street during non -construction hours. 12. Area residents within 300' shall be notified about the pipeline construction operation prior to commencement of construction. 13. Detour signs on pipeline construction routes -shall be placed at appropriate locations. 14. Steel plates covering pipeline excavation trenches shall be placed to permit traffic movement during non -construction hours. 15. Pipelines shall be designed with ample safety factors, pressure -tested prior to being placed in operation, and monitored for corrosion once in operation. 16. Safety shut -down devices that respond to drops in pipeline pressure shall be incorporated into the project in order to stop the flow of the pipeline contents in case of a pipeline rupture. 17. Groundwater level and land subsidence shall be monitored to insure that pipeline damage does not occur as a result of geologic and hydrologic phenomena. The annual subsidence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 survey shall include a report to the City on monitoring efforts to insure pipeling damage has not occurred. 18. Pipeline construction along Valley Drive shall be approved by the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of a permit. 19. Pipeline construction shall not occur in the area known as the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt. 20. Storage of materials shall not be allowed on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt. The storage or dumping upon the greenbelt of any materials, construction equipment, debris, oil drilling equipment, drilling rigs, piping, etc., and any and all equipment and vehicles necessary for the the construction and maintenance of the pipeline and oil development site shall be prohibited. The use of the greenbelt as a staging area for construction of the oil facility or pipeline shall be be prohibited. There shall be no parking or standing of any vehicles on the greenbelt for any time period. 21. Trenches shall be covered during non -working hours to minimize traffic circulation problems. SECTION 14 Definition and notification requirements for emergency situations: I. For purposes of this Conditional Use Permit, "Emergency" is defined as follows: A threat to the health and safety of persons 'in the surrounding area to the drill site and the following conditions which require immediate action: -A. Conditions which could lead to a potential spill or well blowout: 1. Entry of oil and gas into the wellbore while drilling, tripping or out of the hole which may be indicated by one or more of the following: a. Pit volume gain b. Well flowing with pumps off c. Flow rate increases with circulation d. Improper hole fill -up on trips e. Sudden increase in drilling rate f. Pump pressure decreases and pump rate increases g. Decrease in returning mud rate h. Sloughing shale i. Changes in mud salinity and/or mud flow properties 2. Lost circulation or loss of ability to circulate 3. Casing or wellhead failure while drilling 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Stuck pipe and/or equipment during any of the following operations: a. Drilling b. Tripping drill pipe and tools c. Wireline logging d. Drill stem testing e. Running casing f. Perforating and stimulating completion interval 5. Loss of rig power or equipment failure while drilling or tripping. B. Injuries to personnel at the Drill Site C. Conditions which could reduce the stability and safety of the rig and production equipment: 1. Natural events: a. Excessive winds, rain and lightning b. Floods c. Subsidence d. Earthquakes 2. Other events: a. Riots/Demonstrations b. Fire II. Notification Required: In the case of an emergency,' as defined above, the permittee shall give immediate notice to the City of the occurrence of the emergency event. The City will provide a list of phone numbers. A written notice, including a detailed description of the emergency condition, and the actions taken and/or proposed to be taken to correct the situation, shall be provided within 24 hours of the occurrence of the emergency event. SECTION 15 1. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of both properties involved have filed at the office of the Department of Planning their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of._the conditions of this grant. 2. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 3. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if any of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the -City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or. hold harmless the City. a. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the -City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its .sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. b. The permittee shall provide a cash bond to the City, in the amount of $50,000, to be used by the City towards Attorneys costs in the event of litigation. This conditional use permit shall not be in full force and effect until this cash bond is submitted. 5. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. - SECTION 16 The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit. and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject project. The Planning Commission shall review, and if necessary, modify the conditions as set forth in this Conditional Use Permit on an annual basis or upon change in the operator of the project. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this Conditional Use Permit if any violation of these conditions or the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code occurs. The City shall provide the operator with notice in writing of any violation, stating the City's basis for determining that a violation has occurred. The operator shall have a reasonable time to abate the violation before further action is taken. The City may require the operator with notice in writing to submit written documentation of actions taken to remedy any violation and may require 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 monitoring or other procedures to be implemented in order to ensure that the violation will be abated. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1993, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY p/persoil 8/5/93 1 David E. Gautschy, Inc. 5772 Bolsa Avenue, Suite # 201 Huntington Beach, Cal. 92649 (714) 894-3533 E( MEMORANDUM TO: Michael A. Schubach Planning Director City of Hermosa Beach RECEIVED AUG 4 1993 FROM: David Gautschy �� PLANNING DEPT. SUBJECT: Determine minimum height of dike wall in tankfarm DATE: August 4, 1993 TELEPHONE NO: 310-372-6186 PAGES 2 Please find enclosed a copy of the calculations for determining compliance with Section 79.507 (c) of the Uniform Fire Code for minimum height of dike walls. The calculations were based on the code requirement plus the addition of 10%. of the volumes of all other tanks which is the industry standard. Using the industry standard for determining the height of the dike walls in the calculations sets the minimum height at 3.08 feet. The dike wall height of 6 feet which is shown on our plans is approximately double the required height. If you have any questions, please call. CC: Don Macpherson Jr. Macpherson OH Company - Hermosa Beach Project DETERMINE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF DIKE WALL IN TANKFARM Tank Specifications Tank No. Tank Diameter Nominal Tank Operating Tank FT. Height in FT. Height in FT. T-1 T-2 T-3 7-4 T-5 Totals 38.67 38.67 15.5 29.72 29.72 16 16 16 16 16 14.34 14.34 14.34 14.34 14.34 RECEIVED AUG 41993 PLANNING DEPT. Tank Area Maximum SF. Capacity BBL. 1,173.86 1,173.86 188.60 693.37 693.37 3,923.07 3,347 3,347 538 1,977 1,977 Operating Capacity, BBL. 2,999 2,999 482 1,772 1,772 11,185 10,024. Design Criteria: Section 79.507 (c) Uniform Fire Code, 1991 Ed. 1. The volumetric capacity of the diked area shall not be less than the greatest amount of liquid that can be released from the largest tank within the diked area. The capacity of the diked area enclosing more than one tank shall be calculated by deducting the volume of the tanks other than the largest tank below the height of the dike. Tankfarm retention area: 9,500 Square Feet. Net Retention Area = Retention Area - Tank area + Largest Tank (Spilled Tank) Determine Net Retention Area Retention Tank Largest Net Retention Area SF Area SF Tank SF Area SF 9,500 3,923 1,174 6,751 Cubic Feet of Retention Required = - Largest Tank Volume in BBL. + 10% of Remaining Tank Volumes x Conversion Factor. Convert Barrels to Cubic Feet Largest 10% of Total BBL. Tank BBL. Other Tanks 2,999 702 3,701 Conversion Cubic Feet Factor CF/BBL. Required 5.61 20,780 Minimum Dike Height Required = Cubic Feet of Retention Required / Net Retention Area. Determine Minimum Dike Height Cubic Feet Net Retention Minimum Dike Required Area SF Height in FT. 20,780 6,751 3.08 DIKE HEIGHT PROVIDED =6 FT. MINIMUM Prepared by David E. Gautschy, Inc. 8/4/93 Mr. Schubach presented the Staff Report, described the property and proposed plans, stating the applicant requested the extension due to the poor state of the economy. Chmn. Di Monda opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m. Donald Karasevicz, 840 15th Street, stated the project is heavily weighted toward the concrete work, requiring more up -front cash. No one else wished to speak relating to this issue, and Chmn. Di Monda closed the Public Hearing at 7:51 p.m. MOTION by Comm. Merl, Seconded by Comm. Oakes, to APPROVE the request for a 6 -month extension. AYES: Comms. Marks, Merl, Oakes, Chmn. Di Monda NOES: None ABSENT: Comm. Suard ABSTAIN: None HEARINGS 10. CUP 93-12 -- REFERRAL BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OIL DEVELOPMENT AT THE CITY YARD, 555 6TH STREET, AND OIL PIPELINE FROM 6TH STREET SOUTH TO HERONDO STREET ON VALLEY DRIVE. Staff ecommended Actio: To review and comment. Comm. Merl stated his non -participation due to conflict of interest and exited the Chambers. Mr. Schubach presented the Staff Report, stated this item was referred back due to the modifications which had been made by City Council. He detailed the most significant Planning Commission recommendations which had not included and the changes made by the City Council, as well as the supplemental information supplied by Staff. General Condition #12 was recommended as an addition to the current draft, specifying a total of 55 months for the project development. Chmn. Di Monda requested the E.I.R. be brought to Chambers for reference. Mr. Schubach obtained the copy. Comm. Marks asked if the workover rig would be acoustically wrapped, to which Mr. Schubach responded if it were necessary to reduce noise, the workover rig and diesel engine would be. Comm. Marks asked for a schedule of royalties, which is covered within the lease agreement. AST 4 P.C. Minutes 8-3-93 FT David Gautschy, project manager, Macpherson Oil Company stated he would answer any questions. Comm. Oakes commented the Commission had recommended a 3 -year completion date. Mr. Gautschy stated the time period was at total of 55 months and explained the time tables within that time frame for a total of 35 wells; one existing, 30 production and 4 water (disposal) wells. Chmn. Di Monda commented the project had been described at 30 wells, which included the water wells (not 35 wells) and mitigation measures were to be backed out of the 30 wells. He felt the 55 -month time period was worse scenario. Mr. Gautschy stated the water wells were a mitigation measure. He noted the text described the project; with 35 wells being shown on the original application plans. The plans have not been changed since inception. Mr. Brock stated it was common to discuss only the production wells. Comm. Oakes objected to the addition of five wells, noting they could impact Hermosa Beach, which is a small city. Mr. Schubach confirmed there were to be 30 producing oil wells. Chmn. Di Monda stated the Commission was having problems with the project because whenever the Commission felt it understood the project, it was changed. Nothing is to be read into an E.I.R. or Code or take a lesser standard when a choice is available. Chmn. Di Monda noted a social economic study had not been completed, but was replaced by the City Attorney's letter stating it would not be conducted. Chmn. Di Monda felt the Commission did not know the truth as to impact. The Commission agreed, to expedite this issue, to review, approve or amend the Draft Resolution and Conditions. Discussion and Commission response is as follows: SECTION 1. GENERAL Items 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11 were APPROVED Item 4 to be changed to read, "...workover rigs or any other rig that is used shall be...6:00 p.m. and is not be operated on holidays or week ends." Item 10 is to include the paragraph included by Staff, although it is different from the original or the Commissioners' copies. Add Condition #12 which was in the first draft Resolution. A time limit is to be stated as the same amount of time that is stated in the Environmental Impact Report (55 months, possibly). Add Condition #13 which is to be the property value protection plan. Staff is to provide to Council an analysis noting this is the same plan that the drilling company works with in Huntington Beach and is a reasonable plan that does not guarantee profits to speculators. Staff is to strike the comment, "It has not been demonstrated in the E.I.R. or elsewhere that this project will negatively impact property values." Chmn. Di Monda suggested DRAFT - 5 - P.C. Minutes 8-3-93 FAFT when the opportunity was presented. Comm. Oakes suggested it be noted an E.I.R. studies certain aspects of any project that are related to very set standards by the governing agency; items which may not specifically relate to Hermosa Beach. The C.U.P. is felt to be as important as the E.I.R. SECTION 2. LAND USE DEVELOPMENT Items 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 were APPROVED Item 2 to be changed to read, "...shall be performed and approved by all governing agencies having jurisdiction over the project." Item 3 - Approval to be held until the Uniform Fire Code has been reviewed and a calculation of tank volume is completed and presented to the Commission. Chmn. Di Monda requested that calculation be presented to him on August 4, 1993. Mr. Schubach commented D.O.G. did notrequire 1 1/2 times the volume of the tank fluids. Checks would be made for correctness prior_ to issuance of a Building Permit. Mr. Gautschy stated the calculations had been completed based upon the Code, noting the dike area being provided is -twice the Code requirement. He explained the industry standard and method of calculation. Mr. Brock reiterated that Code must be met prior to issuance of permits. Chmn. Di Monda reiterated the Section should refer to the Uniform Fire Code and calculations should be made, with minimum requirements based upon the Uniform Fire Code. Mr. Brock did not feel it was pertinent to be discussing a prospective plan of what the applicant hoped to obtain, since proper installation will be required prior to time of construction, Comm. Oakes felt the Commission's questions were very pertinent in the formulation of its decisions, agreeing with Chmn, Di Monda's requests. SECTION 3. PUBLIC SAFETY Item 1 - The Commission's change is to be deleted. Item 10 - Change "drawings" to "documents". No comment was made regarding Items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12, Section 4. FIRE SAFETY, Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. SECTION 5. SUBSIDENCE Items 5 and 6 were APPROVED. No comment was made on Items 1, 2, 3 and 4. SECTION 6. VEHICLE TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION ON AND OFF SITE Items 4 and 8 was approved as is. - 6 - P.C. Minutes 8-3-93 ,fi SFT Item 11, final paragraph shall state, "...production phase and in close out phase." Item 12 is to include language stating, "the operator will hire a licensed contractor and provide street profiles, drawings and engineering to the satisfaction of Public Works Dept. prior to work commencing." No comment was made on Items 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 13. SECTION 7. SANITARY SEWER Delete this section. SECTION 8. NOISE/VIBRATION Item I.a - Delete "approximately" Item 7 - Change to read, "...workover rigs or any other rig that is used shall be operated....weekday hours only, not on holidays or weekends, except in an..." Item 9 - Staff's recommendation was approved. Add Item 10 per Staff's recommendation. No comment was made on Items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8. SECTION 9. LANDSCAPING Item 3 was will be further discussed regarding the 16 -foot high perimeter wall. Items 4 and 5 - Change to read, "...satisfaction and field review of the..." No comment was made on Items 1, 2, 6 and 7. SECTION 10. AESTHETICS Item 7 - Change `to read, "Split -faced block masonry or concrete..." - A 12 -foot high wall during construction was agreed upon, as long as the landscape buffers were 16 feet high; Geld reviewed by the Planning Dept. Item 9 was approved. Item 10 - Change to read, "...dismantled at the expense of the operator." AST - 7 - P.C. Minutes 8-3-93 Staffs recommendations pertaining to this Section were approved with the addition of a Condition requiring A.Q.M.D. Staff training, with costs clarification. SECTION 12. GRADING/STORM WATER/SITE RUNOFF Item 6 - Change to read, "...public area at any time during any phase of planning, production or close out." Mr. Brock commented the wells would be completed at the same time the tanks are built to expedite production. Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 was approved. SECTION 13. PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION Item 17 is to include a time frame requirement for the annual report to the City. All other items were approved. SECTION 14 II. Notification, Required: ADD 'The City will provide Macpherson Oil Company with a listing of numbers and names of City contacts. This listing will be available to the public." No comment was made regarding Items I.A., B., C. SECTIONS 15 and 16 No change. MOTION by Chmn. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Marks, to APPROVE. C.U.P. 93-12, incorporating the comments made by the Commission and following Staff's recommendation when no comment was made. AYES: Comms. Marks, Oakes, Chmn. Di Monda NOES: None ABSENT: -Nen- Ce►.-..+ . Su.^ol ABSTAIN: Comm. Merl • Chmn. Di Monda requested copies of the previous Staff Reports relating to this subject on August 4, 1993 for his review. Comm. Merl returned to continue his participation in this meeting. 8 - P.C. Minutes 8-3-93 a August 10, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council August 10, 1993 MODIFIED CONDITION REGARDING OIL DEVELOPMENT TIME FRAMES Recommendation: Change Condition 12, Section I, General to read as follows: 12. All wells must be drilled and completed within 55 months from the start of drilling of the first exploratory well in accordance with the following schedule: EXPLORATION AND TEST PHASE 12 MONTHS exploratory drilling, production testing) CONSTRUCTION PHASE 9 MONTHS (Permanent facility construction) DRILLING PHASE 34 MONTHS (Development Drilling, 1 month per well) If the Drilling Contractor is delayed at any time in the progress of work by any act or neglect of the City of Hermosa Beach or any other governmental body having authority over this project, or by labor disputes, adverse weather conditions, by law, war, riots, strikes, unavoidable casualties, unusual delays in receiving materials or equipment or by an act of God, or causes beyond the control of the Drilling Contractor, when justified may be extended a reasonable time to correspond with the delay incurred by the Drilling Contractor. For the following reasons this recommended condition needs to be changed: 1. E.I.R. allows 3 months for initial construction and drilling rig erection. 2. The removal of the existing gas tank, soil contamination analysis and possible removal of contaminated soil, which is a mitigation measure, will need to be completed before the test phase. 3. The erection of the 30 ft. sound wall which is another mitigation measure will also need to be completed prior to any test drilling. 4. The E.I.R. project description allows for a 12 month period solely for the exploration and test phase. In addition to the above a clause regarding untimely problems beyond the control of the developer needs to be included. For example the City yard's permanent relocation may result in a delay caused by the City. SUPPLEMENTAL - 1 -INFORMATION (o��,i\ Michael Schubach Planning Director plandoc/srccotim Concur: ary Rooney Interim City/ anager VIA HAND DELIVERY DT: AUG 10, 1993 TO: HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL FR: Tom Morley, Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition RE: MacPherson Oil Project It has come to our attention that the subject project plan has changed so as to conflict with the EIR. 1. According to the subject site plan, the retaining basin has shrunk to 22% of the volume required by the EIR. Calculations are attached. 2. The timeline for the project has increased for all phases of the project. These are further actions that would constitute legal grounds for rejection of the Conditional Use Permit, as, per CEQA, they represent substantial changes to the project. We urge you to order the circulation of a Subsequent EIR to analyze these and the other changes delineated in the letter to the City from Jan Chatten-Brown written on our behalf and dated July 8, 1993, and the memorandum from Rosamond Fogg to the city dated August 6, 1993. copy: Jan Chatten - Brown, Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger Ed Lee - Oliver, Barr & Vose Mary Rooney - Hermosa Beach City Manager TM/rdf Please note that a recent large spill at the SCE site in El Segundo was due to fuel from a ruptured tank overflowing a retaining wall, serving as an important lesson not to plan a basin too small to contain spillage. Fortunately, sand had choked the storm drain so the fuel was not released into the ocean, and only the beach was polluted. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORM ATOM 9 1. vol. IV FEIR, App. A Sect. 2.0, Pg. 4 shows recommended/required mitigation measures specifically stating "work areas will be bermed and all storage tanks will be within a basin; such basin will be of a sufficient size to contain 1-1/2 times the volume of potential spilled materials." Further, Sect. 3.1, Phase 2, Pg. 32 states "The basin will be able to hold 1-1/2 the volume of all fluid from all the tanks simultaneously, if necessary, in an emergency." In a letter prepared by David E. Gautshy 8/4/93 there will be a maximum capacity of 11,185 bbls, thus requiring 16,777.5 bbls per the EIR. By applying Mr. Gautschy's conversion factor of 5.61 cubic ft. per bbl, it can be shown that 94,121.7 cubic ft. of basin is required (16,777.5 x 5.61). By further using the applicant's Net Retention Area of 6,751 sq. ft. in the calculation provided, a dike height of 13.94 ft. would be required. This 6 ft. berm now being planned in the CUP is a significant change from the approximately 14 ft. berm required in the FEIR. The new change calls for a basin that would hold 3,701 bbls rather than the 16,777.5 bbls required to be retained in the FEIR. 2. Vol. II FEIR, Fig. 4 shows a chart of 3 years' timeline for all phases of the project. The 53% increase in the term of the project, now described as 55 mos. is a significant change requiring further analysis from the public. VIA HAND DELIVERY DT: AUG 6, 1993 TO: HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL`' FR: Rosamond Fogg, Hermosa Beach Stop Oil RE: MacPherson Oil Project :;- AUG Oa cr, City - Cif, tie,m L� Coalition \%�• It has come to our attention that the subject project plan has changed so as to include five additional wells - four to be drilled and one to be reactivated, ostensibly for the purpose of water injection. This brings the total wells to thirty-five or five more than the thirty designated in the EIR. If water injection is to be performed, in order to remain within the confines of the EIR, some number of the thirty allowable wells must be dedicated to water injection. Another departure from the EIR is the tank depth, which was to be eight- to ten feet. The plan before you only requires a six- to eight foot depth. The argument to the Planning Commission at their August 3 meeting was that eight feet exceeded the maximum allowable under the City Fire Code. Actually, the Code requires the installation of ladders under circumstances where a depth beyond eight feet is constructed. This particular deviation from the EIR appears to be a cost-cutting measure, and an action contradictory to the continual utterances of a developer who has for years assured citizens that we would enjoy the safest, finest, best equipped, state-of-the-art, etc. etc. project that would serve as a model for all of California. These actions are but two more that would constitute legal grounds for rejection of the Conditional Use Permit, as, per CEQA, they represent substantial changes to the project. We urge you to order the circulation of a Subsequent EIR to analyze these and the other changes delineated in the letter to the City from Jan Chatten-Brown written on our behalf and dated July 8, 1993. copy: Jan Chatten - Brown, Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger Ed Lee - Oliver, Barr & Vose Mary Rooney - Hermosa Beach City Manager SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 8 July 30, 1993 Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of August 10, 1993 CONSIDERATION OF ALLOCATING $6,000 FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Recommendation It is recommended by staffthat Council approve the attached agreement (Attachment A) to allocate up to $6,000 to the School District for the purpose of maintaining the landscaped areas of their schools and authorize the mayor to sign the agreement. Background The City Council reviewed a request from Superintendent, Gwen Gross in February, 1993 to consider renewing the City's previous agreement with the District that provided them with $11,500 of City funds for landscape maintenance. At that time, Council voted to delay the decision until the City could complete the FY 93-94 budget process (Attachment B). When Council approved the FY 93-94 budget, $6,000 was allocated under the Public Works 001-400-6101-4201 (Parks) account for this purpose. In light of that, Superintendent Gross forwarded another request for funds to the City on July 20, 1993 (Attachment C). Analysis These types of agreements between cities and schools are generally adopted in recognition that school grounds exist as important recreational resources for the community during non -school hours. Like the City, the School District is faced with ever diminishing allocations from the State and are forced to seek alternative ways to meet their funding requirements. In September, our District will be opening an additional school (Hermosa View). Needless to say, the renovation and operation of this site will place an additional burden on the District's finances. Some of our neighboring cities like Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach pay for or provide the total cost of landscape maintenance for their schools (Manhattan Beach has budgeted $221,500 this year for school ground maintenance and Redondo Beach sends in- house crews to care for the landscaped areas of their schools). Needless to say, the $6,000 will not meet the District's entire cost of maintaining school grounds. Current estimates are at $21,600 for the next 12 months. pagel 10 1 With the addition of the Hermosa View site, the City's residents stand to benefit even more than in the past from the improved facilities and recreational opportunities. The District abided by the terms of the last agreement (which expired on January 31, 1993) and have worked cooperatively with the City in allowing for recreational programming at the Valley School site. This allocation would be welcomed by our District and would further solidify good relations between the City and our schools. (Fiscal Impact: $6,000 allocation from the general fund. Other alternatives available to the Council include: 1) Modify the terms and/or dollar amount of the agreement. 2) Deny the request for funds. 3) Defer consideration of the request until FY 93-94 midyear budget review. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment A: Agreement 2. Attachment B: Minutes from February 23, 1993 Council Meeting 3. Attachment C: July 20, 1993 request Respectfiilly Submitted, Mary .: : l ey Ac _ City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: ataltritsci4.) Viki Copeland Finance Director page2 ATTACHMENT "A" SCHOOL FIELDS USAGE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS SCHOOL FIELDS USAGE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into as of the 1st day of September, 1993 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation (the "City"), and the HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a regularly organized and existing school district under the laws of the State of California (the "School District"). RECITALS A. The School District is the fee simple owner of the school site at 1645 Valley Drive located within the city of Hermosa Beach. B. The City and School District desire to make this open space (the "Open Space") available for the benefit of the community. C. The City and the School District additionally desire that such open space be maintained in a suitable manner. D. The City and the School District desire that such open space be maintained as set forth below and recognize that a financial partnership for such maintenance is appropriate. E California Education Code (Reorganized) (the "Ed. Code") Section 10900 et seq. and California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. authorize a school district and a city to cooperate in providing recreational facilities for the benefit of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City and the School District further agree as follows: 1 Section 1. Initial Agreements _ A. School District's Warranties. As an inducement to the City to enter into this Agreement, the School District represents, warrants and covenants as follows: (i) that it is a regularly organized and existing school district under the laws of the State of California, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California; (i i) that is has power and authority to carry on its function as a school district, to enter into this Agreement, and to consummate the transaction herein contemplated; (iii) that all actions required to be taken by or on behalf of the School District to authorize it to make, deliver and carry out the terms of this Agreement have been duly and properly taken prior to the execution of this Agreement; and (iv) that this Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the School District, enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as the same may be affected by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratoria, or similar laws, or by legal or equitable principles relating to or limiting the rights of contracting parties generally. B. City's Warranties. As an inducement to the School District to enter into this Agreement, the City represents, warrants and covenants as follows: (i) that it is a municipal corporation, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California; 2 (i i) that it has power and authority to carry on its function as .a city, to enter into this Agreement, and to consummate the transaction herein contemplated; (i i i) that all actions required to be taken by or on behalf of the City to authorize it to make, deliver and carry out the terms of this Agreement have been duly and properly taken prior to the execution of this Agreement; and (iv) that this Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the City, enforceable in accordance with its terms except as the same may be affected by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium or similar laws, or by legal or equitable principles relating to or limiting the rights of contracting parties generally. Section 2. The Open Space. The open space subject to the Terms of this Agreement shall be: A. The playing surfaces and landscaped areas at Hermosa Valley School. Section 3. Covenant. The City covenants to deliver to the School District the total sum of six thousand ($6,000) dollars in monthly installments on the first day of each month in the amount of five hundred ($500) dollars for twelve (12) months. Such payments shall be for the purpose of maintaining the Open Space in a manner suitable for recreational use. Such maintenance shall be performed by a mutually agreed upon contractor. The school district shall have sole responsibility to pay for and administer the work of the contractor per the terms of this Agreement. 3 Section 4. Term. The term of this Agreement (the "Term") shall be one (1) year (the "Covenant") effective September 1, 1993 with renewal negotiable by both parties. Section 5. Scheduling. The School District shall be responsible for scheduling the use of the Open Space during the Usage Period and shall have priority in the use of the Open Space at any time. In order for the City to schedule a priority use of the field during the period of this agreement, the City shall schedule such uses with the School District by means of a Use of Facilities Permit, without payment of any additional fees, at least twenty (20) days in advance of such use. Other than at those time when the School District or City have scheduled priority usage, the Open Space shall be available after school hours, on weekends, and on holidays for the benefit of the public including organized sports leagues and city - sanctioned events. Section 6. Miscellaneous. Any notice which is required or permitted to be given by any provision of this Agreement, may be given by hand delivery, by any overnight courier service providing dated evidence of delivery, or by US Certified mail return receipt requested. Each notice shall be addressed as follows: if to the City: with a copy to: City of Hermosa Beach Attn: City Manager 1321 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (City's attorney) 4 if to the School District: Hermosa Beach City School District Attn: Superintendent 1645 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 with a copy to: Breon, O'Donnell, Miller et al Attn: David Miller 2550 Via Tejon Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 The City and the School District may each designate different addresses for the receipt of notice by delivering notice of any such change of address to the other party. Notices shall be deemed given as of the date of delivery. B. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The signature page of any counterpart may be detached therefrom without impairing the legal effect of the signature(s) thereon provided such signature page is attached to any other counterpart identical thereto except having additional signature pages executed by other parties to the Agreement attached thereto. C. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any questions arising hereunder shall be construed and determined according to such laws. D. Headings. Headings at the beginning of each numbered section of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of the parties and are not a part of this Agreement. 5 E. Time. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. F. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements between the parties with respect to the matters contained in this Agreement. Any waiver, modification, consent or acquiescence with respect to any provision of this Agreement shall be set forth in writing and duly executed on behalf of the party to be bound thereby. No waiver by any party of any breach hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. G. No Other Inducement. The making, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the parties hereto have been induced by no representations, statements, warranties, or agreements other that those expressly set forth herein. 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement as of the date first written above. ATTEST: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation By: City Clerk Printed Name: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lr.....4 „IL( City Attorney City of Hermosa Beach HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT A regularly organized and existing school district under the laws of the State of California By: Printed Name: 7 Attachment "B" The meeting recessed at 9:30 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:54 P.M. and resumed the order of the agenda at item no. 1. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. STATUS REPORT ON PARKING LOT CONFIGURATION, VICINITY OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN 2ND AND 3RD STREETS. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated February 3, 1993. (Continued from February 9, 1993 meeting.) City Manager Ferrin suggested continuing this item until the meeting with all property owners has taken place and gave a brief report on the status of the current negotiations. He said the two end property owners of the proposed reconfiguration were unwilling to grant the City a ten foot easement over their respective property, thus the City had three options: 1) wall them out; 2) construct the parking lot as a flat U (losing six spaces); or 3) make the lot one-way with angled parking. Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the meeting of March 9, 1993. 8. MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW FY 1992-93. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 18, 1993. Supplemental memorandum from City Treasurer Gary Brutsch, dated February 21, 1993. City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To study bringing the City Attorney position in-house. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Essertier, Midstokke, and Mayor Wiemans. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, bud- get transfers and designations as presented in the "City of Hermosa Beach Budget Summary, 1992-1993 Midyear Re- view"; but, deny the requested use of Fire Flow Funds and the Utility User Tax; and for staff to come back with a plan to make up the shortfall in other areas, such as cutting administrative staff. Motion Midstokke, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Mayor Wiemans. 9. SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR GROUNDS MAINTENANCE PROVIDED BY THE CITY. Memorandum from Community Resources Direc- tor Mary Rooney dated February 12, 1993. City Council Minutes 02-23-93 Page 8076 Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report, responded to Council questions, and introduced the new Hermosa School District Superintendent, Gwen Gross. City Manager Ferrin stated that the unencumbered reserve was 1.476 million dollars. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Gwen Gross - Superintendent, Hermosa Beach School District, said that the district will have in- creased costs due to the proposed reopening of the Hermosa View school due to increased en- rollment, and would appreciate any assistance the City could give for the children of Hermosa Beach. Action: To approve staff alternative No. 3: to defer consideration of this request until the FY 93-94 budget review. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car- ried unanimously. 10. AWARD OF DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS. Memoranda from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated February 11, 1993. Public Works Director McDonald presented the staff re- port and responded to Council questions, noting that $1,000,000 in liability insurance would be required of any contractor, but no performance bond was required as the contracts were on a 30 day cancellation basis. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Helene Frost - Coast Drug owner, Pier Avenue, con- cerned regarding the award of the contracts (for similar service) to two different compa- nies; questioned using a North Hollywood compa- ny when the local, Redondo Beach, contractor, who has been performing the service, did a good job; suggested that factors other than cost alone be considered as there was only a $4,500 difference in the bids. A. TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR DOWNTOWN AREA CLEANING TO HYDRO PRESSURE SYSTEMS OF NORTH HOLLYWOOD FOR A 2 YEAR AND 3 MONTH PERIOD AT A COST OF $61,425. Proposed Action: To award the contract to Hydro Pressure Systems of North Hollywood as recommended by staff. Motion Essertier, Second Benz. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Edgerton, Midstokke and Mayor Wiemans. City Council Minutes 02-23-93 Page 8077 1645 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach California 90254 (310) 376-8961 FAX: (310) 376-4974 Members of the Board of Trustees Vicki Garcia Lynne Gonzales Greg Kelsey Cathy McCurdy Mary Lou Weiss Superintendent Gwen E. Gross, Ph.D. July 20, 1993 Attachment "C" HERMOSA BEACH City School District Mary Rooney, Acting City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Mary: RECEIVED JUL 2 2 1993 CITY MGR. OFFICE Thank you for your recent update regarding the landscaping contract the City has held jointly with the Hermosa Beach City School District. At the February 23, 1993 City Council meeting, the Council postponed any consideration of a continuance of the $11,500 contract for maintenance until the new budget year. It is now my understanding that the City of Hermosa Beach has allocated $6,000 for a continuance of this maintenance agreement in the budget for the coming year. We recognize the City's budgetary challenge and we appreciate your efforts to continue to support our open space agreement. Please advise me at your earliest convenience regarding the final approval of this allocation. I would also appreciate receipt of your contractual documents so we can jointly finalize this agreement with our Board of Trustees. Thank you for your continued support or the Hermosa Beach City School L isirict. Gwen E. Gross, Ph.D. Superintendent GEGN „el 3 s y 93-' August 2, 1993 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council August 10, 1993 SUBJECT: 1. REDUCED FEE FOR AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 2. PRELIMINARY STUDY OF USES THAT REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS PURPOSE: 1. TO REDUCE THE FEE FOR MINOR AMENDMENTS TO C.U.P.'S 2. TO REVIEW THE CATEGORIES OF USES THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR A C.U.P. AND STUDY POSSIBLE CHANGES INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendations 1. To add a new fee category for Minor C.U.P. Amendments and to establish the fee to be $100 and to adopt the attached resolution to amend the Master Fee Resolution 90-5422. 2. Initiate a study of the list of uses that require C.U.P.'s by adopting the attached resolution of intent. Background At the meeting of June 22, 1993 the City Council requested staff to return with a report to reduce the fee for amending conditions of C.U.P.'s to just the cost of noticing and the newspaper advertisement. At the meeting of May 25, 1993, the Council requested staff to report on the reasons C.U.P.'s are need for certain businesses and to include the staff report of July 27, 1990, relating to amortization of existing business that need C.U.P.'s. Analysis REDUCED FEE Currently the fee for a Conditional Use Permit is $650.75, and the reduced fee for an amendment to a C.U.P. is $347. When the legally required cost of first time noticing is added ($368.50), the total fee for an amendment is $715.50 (if the amendment is within a year of the original request the noticing fee can be reduced to $104 since a mailing list has already been prepared) If an environmental assessment is required another $320 fee is added. These fees were established as part of the comprehensive user fee study completed in 1991, to reflect the average estimated cost to the City of processing these applications. 11 The Council has already reduced the fee for C.U.P. requests for higher fences and walls. This fee was reduced to $207.50 plus noticing costs. In regards to C.U.P. amendments for most projects, minor amendments to plans or other technical matters are already allowed, subject to approval of the Planning Director, with no fee. If it is questionable whether the Planning Director should allow this type of change without an official amendment; staff does obtain confirmation from the Planning Commission. However, when an amendment involves either the elimination or modification of condition of approval (which was imposed at a publicly noticed public hearing), the request must be processed as a C.U.P. amendment and considered at a public hearing. Requests to amend a C.U.P. vary dramatically in terms of complexity and level of controversy, and in the amount of staff time involved. In the past C.U.P. amendments have ranged from a simple change in one condition (i.e. hours of operation) to fairly substantial expansions. Given that not all amendments are simple matters, staff is recommending that a reduced fee be limited to only minor amendments. These are defined as amendments that result in only the modification of the conditions of approval and/or a - modification in the approved plans with no substantial change in business. Staff believes a nominal fee should be required ($100) as each case will still require staff resources to process, even if the research and the final report are minimal. Also, having at least a nominal fee would prevent potential over -use of a no cost option that might overload agendas, or be used as a piece meal approach to reduce requirements. USES THAT REQUIRE C.U.P.'S Attached herewith for your information and for discussion purposes are the following: 1. List of Permitted Uses in the Commercial and Manufacturing zones (Article 8 and Article 9 of the zoning ordinance). Only those uses with the phrase "conditional use permit required..." are required to obtain C.U.P.'s. 2. 7/24/90 Staff Report, regarding amortizing existing businesses that need C.U.P.'s At this time staff is recommending that if the Council wishes to see some changes (additions or deletions) to the uses that require C.U.P.'s that the Council initiate a study and text amendment by adopting the attached resolution of intent. The list of permitted uses was comprehensively studied and updated in 1986. Since that time it has been amended several times to add or delete specific categories of uses. Some examples of uses that could be considered for removal of the C.U.P. requirement are as follows: VIDEOCASSETTE TAPE SALES AND RENTALS TANNING SALON RADIO AND TELEVISION STATIONS MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, RETAIL AND REPAIR Some examples of uses that are currently listed as permitted uses that perhaps should have a C.U.P. requirement are as follows: GUN SHOP POOL HALL SELF SERVICE LAUNDRY CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director Mary ° •o:' -y Inter m City Manager Attachments -1. Proposed Resolution 2. Proposed Resolution of Intent 3. 4. 5. 6. Res. -ctfu y submitted, Associate Planner NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: to amend Master Vicki Copeland Finance Director Fee Resolution Minutes 6/22/93 Minutes and staff memorandum 5/25/93 List of Permitted Uses City Council staff report of July 24, 1990 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW FEE CATEGORY FOR MINOR AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting to establish a new fee for minor amendments to conditional use permits, which are defined as amendments to conditions of aproval or technical changes to the project that do not result in a significant expansion of the use and made the following findings: A. A new fee category for "minor amendments to conditional use permits" should be established; B. The standard amendment fee is too high for minor amendments, and is not necessary to cover the costs of processing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby amend the City's Master Fee Resolution No. 90-5422, as follows: 1. Amend Schedule 3 - Planning, to add a new fee category and to read as follows: "MINOR AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" Legal Authority Fee SEC. 1403 $100 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 10th day of November, 1992 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK p/ccrsfee 4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 e 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO STUDY THE PERMITTED USE LIST IN REGARDS TO THOSE USES WHICH REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR POSSIBLE TEXT AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council held a hearing on August 10, 1993, to discuss the current list of uses that require conditional use permits, and to discuss possible amendments to said list and made the following findings: A. The requirement for conditional use permits is an appropriate and necessary method for controlling and mitigating potential undesirable or adverse impacts associated with certain uses and activities; B. In some cases, however, the requirement to obtain conditional use permit has become unnecessary as the use does not cause any significant impacts; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby directs the Planning Commission to begin the process to study the permitted use list for possible amendments in regards to which uses are required to obtain conditional use permits; PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1993. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TOFORM: p/ccrsint CITY CLERK S CITY ATTORNEY c 13. Requ (a) (b) OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL st from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Request by Councilmember Essertier for considerat •n of ch'nging the police schedule to a five day work ek. Counci member Essertier discussed his Action: 'o have staff return with a a five da work week for the Police regular meet ng of July 13, 1993. Motion Essert'er, second Mayor Wi noting the abse ce of Midstokke. Request by Mayor W to rename the Hermo Wilma Burt. Memorand 1993. Supplemental let sa Beach, received June Turner and Carol Tan 1993; Betty and Gor 22, ;993; Carol R 1993; and John mans for Beach fro request rep D t on going to artment at the ans. So ordered, c• sideration of a proposal uncil Chamber in honor of Mayor Wiemans dated June 3, e -s from Roger Creighton, Hermo- 1993; Charlotte Malone, Jane rmosa Beach, dated June 22, Hermosa Beach, dated June osa Beach, dated June 22,- B ach, 2,_Bach, dated June 22, 1993 r, n Evan nichek, He es, Hermosa Mayor Wieman discussed his reques•. Coming forward to :ddress the Council on this em was: Hoard Lon acre - 1221 Seventh ace, said Mrs. Burt would not want the Counci. Chamber named for her, but she deserved more tha plaque. ction: To form a sub -committee composed of ayor Wie- mans and Councilmember Benz to determine a suitable memorial to Mrs. Burt The above action was directed by Mayor Wiemans wi the consensus of the Council. No further action was t:•ken on this item. (c) Request by Councilmember, Edgerton for consideration. by Council to either abolish or lower the fee charged to a business for having a conditional use permit when an amendment is requested thereto. Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request. Action: To have this item return with a staff report regarding charging just the legally required fees for noticing and newspaper advertisement. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered, noting the absence of Midstokke. City Council Minutes 06-22-93 Page 15 (b) c. r Action: To have staff approach business leaders in the Chamber of Commerce and the Restaurant and Tavern Owners Association to see if there was interest in a shuttle between the three cities, and, to come up with the pre- liminary figure to be funded from Prop A funds. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered, noting the objections of Midstokke and Mayor Wiemans. Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of going out to bid again for City Attorney. Councilmember Benz discussed his request; said the con- tract with the City Attorney had expired. City Attorney Vose said the original contract had no termination; the extension was an extension of his retainer and needed renewal only if that fee was to be increased; and, although he was eligible to ask for an increase in fee, he had refrained from doing so due to the financial problems of the City. Proposed Action: To go out to bid for City Attorney services. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The second was withdrawn and the motion died due to the lack of a second. (c) Request by Councilmember Edgerton to schedule a hearing regarding reasons why conditional use permits are being required for the following businesses: Advanced Laminat- ing, Blue Sky Glass Tinting, Hermosa Silk Screen, Supreme Paint Corp., Johnson Fine Wood, Hap Jacobs Surf- boards, King Harbor Yacht Sales, Hermosa Fitness, Sun - Aired Bag Co., MultiVision Cable Co., Pier Music. Sup- plemental letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue, dated May 25, 1993. Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request and men- tioned that a number of the businesses listed above were not to be included. Action: To have staff report on the reason a CUP is needed for these buses esses, by categories, and to in- clude the staff report of June 24, 1990. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered, noting the objection of Mayor Wiemans. CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: David Gross - 1138 Manhattan Avenue, spoke of park- ing problems on Manhattan Avenue, felt resident permits should be given preference over busi- ness customers parking free in those areas, (Midstokke suggested placing yellow meters in the area); I. City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 11 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning Director SUBJECT: Agenda Item #13(c) -- Businesses Requiring Conditional Use Permits (C.U.P.$) DATE: May 25, 1993 Of the businesses noted, the following are not required to have a C.U.P. 1. Advanced Laminating 2. Hermosa Silk Screen 3. Supreme Paint Corp. 4. Sun -Aired Bag Co. 5. King Harbor Yacht Sales (no outdoor sales) In general, the reasons some uses require C.U.P.s are because in some site specific locations, the following problems could be an impact to the neighboring residential and commercial uses: Noise Odor Dust Appearance Potential Miscellaneous Nuisances Specifically, the reasons for those uses noted in the agenda item which do need C.U.P.s are as follows: 1. Johnson Fine Wood (out of business) -- noise, dust 2. Hap Jacob's Surfboards -- odors, dust 3. Hermosa Fitness -- miscellaneous problems from .assembly of large numbers of people 4. MultiVision (television station studio for live broadcast) -- assembly of large audience, tall aerial antenna (This type of use is probably no longer a problem) 5. Pier Music -- noise (received complaint regarding electrical guitar testing) 6. Blue Sky Tinting -- auto type use typically an appearance problem, probably no problem in this case. p/memo3 84CHORa1/ND Mil TFR/AC § 7.5-11 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 8.2 • ARTICLE 8. COMMERCIAL ZONES, C-1; C-2, and C-3• Sec. 8-1. General. In the C -zones, no building shall be erected, constructed, recon- structed, structurally altered, or shall any building or land be used for any purpose except as hereinafter specifically provided and allowed by this article. (Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, 12-16-86) Sec. 8-2. Neighborhood commercial zone. In a C-1 zone, the following retail stores, shops, businesses, and services are permitted: Antiques (genuine), retail sales; Aquariums, sales and supplies of marine life; Art gallery or shop; Art objects, retail sales; - •Editor's note—Ord. No. 86.865, § 1, adopted Dec. 16, 1986, amended Art. 8, • in its entirety to read as herein set out.. Prior to amendment, such article had • pertained to the same subject matter and was derived from thefollowing: . Ord. No. Date Sec. Ord. No. Date Sec. N.S. 216 3, 4 76-545 12-28-76 1 N.S. 259 1-5 78-581 3-28-78 1 N.S. 298 2-21-67 3 79-616 6-26.79 1 N.S. 314 8-15-67 2-4 79-620 7.10.79 1-3 N.S. 382 4-21-70 1 79.623 10-23-79 1 . N.S. 472 10- 2-73 2 82-688 4- 6-82 1 82-693 7-13-82 .. • • 1, 2 83.741 10-25-83 5 85.815 10-22-85 6-8 Supp. No. 4.87 493 § 8-2 • HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 8.2 Bakery; Barber shop; Beach recreational equipment sales and rentals; Beauty shop; Bicycle sales and repair; Blueprinting; Books (new and old); Clinic, dental and/or medical; Clothing and wearing apparel; Collection agency; Confectionery stores; Curio shop; Dairy products, retail; Day nursery, preschool, and/or after school child care with thirteen (13) or more children, conditional use permit re- quired subject to section 10-9; Delicatessen; Detective agency; Drugstore; Employment agency, private; Engraving, metal, hand; Fish market; Florist shop; Food market (maximum 4,000 square feet floor area); Fruit store; Furrier; Health food store; Supp. No. 4.87 494 § 8-2 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 8.2 Hobby supply; Ice cream parlor, including freezing dispenser machine; Instruments (professional and/or scientific), sales; Interior decorating studio, store or shop; Jewelry store; Knit shop; Laundry business and drycleaning, outlet only; Laundry, self-service; Leather products, retail sales only; Liquor store, retail, off -sale, conditional use permit required subject to section 10-8; Loan office; Locksmith business; Manicure parlor; Meat market, (no slaughtering, evisceration, plucking or dressing); Messenger service; Millinery shop; Music store, records, tapes and cassettes only; News and magazine store (new merchandise only); Optician office (including grinding and mounting of lenses); Paint and'/or wallpaper store, retail; Parkingbuilding, automobile, not including repair facilities; Parking lots; Pastry shop; Photocopying; Phonograph gallery; Photographer's studio; Supp. No. 5-88 495 § 8-2 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 8-2 Photographic equipment (new), retail sales including tradein; Plumbing fixtures, retail sales (no exterior storage); Poultry market (dressed only); Produce market retail; Professional offices, (medical, dental, architect, engineers, at- torney, accountant and other similar professions); Real estate office; Residence; One (1) or more apartments may be built above a commer- cial building, provided the whole building including the ground floor and second and third floors, has a side yard setback of ten (10) percent of the width of the lot, with a minimum of three (3) feet and a maximum of five (5) feet, and with no encroachment over city property; conditional use permit required subject to article 10; Restaurant/cafe, beer and wine only permitted with conditional use permit subject to section 10-7; Reverse vending machine(s), subject to Article 10, section 10-10; Shoe repair business; Shoe store; Snack bar/snack shop; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10. Stationery; Tailor shop; Tile (ornamental); Tobacco store; Toy store; Videocassette tape sales and rentals, except Adult "X" rated type; conditional use permit required subject to section 10-2; Watch repair shop; Supp. No. 5-88 496 § 8-3 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 8.3 Weaving apparel shop (new only); Yardage shop; Other uses may be added by amendment in accordance with Article 15 or the zoning ordinance. (Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, 12-16-86; Ord. No. 87-905, § 1, 9-22-87; Ord. No. 87-911, § 2, 12-15-87; Ord. No. 88-916, § 1, 2-23-88; Ord. No. 88-918, § 2, 3-8-88) • Sec. 8-3. C-2, Restricted commercial zone. In a C-2 zone, the following retail stores, shops, businesses and services are permitted: Those uses permitted in the C-1 Zone, except residential uses; Alcohol beverage establishments, on- and off -sale; conditional use permit required subject to sections 10-7 and 10-8: Appliance (gas or electric) new, sales, and repair; Automobile parts and accessories (new), retail sales; Banks and financial institutions; Baths, Turkish, Swedish and steam; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10 of the zoning ordinance and section 21-8 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code; Billiard or pool halls; Brokerage, stocks and bonds; . Carpet stores (including other forms of floor:coverin Clubs, private; Dancing academy; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Dancing customer; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Department stores; Drycleaning and dyeing; Supp. No. 5-88 497 8-3 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE ; 8.3 Entertainment, live; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Entertainment, special performances, sponsored by licensed merchants or bona fide residents' groups or clubs for bene- fit purposes; conditional use permit required subject . to Article 10; Funeral homes, including mortuaries; Furniture store (new); Garden equipment, small, hand -operated, sales and rentals; GYNNASiUM�N6ILTH rNas CENTE(. ; G.i.o,ro-ho'!_ use Pelt -lir ' Ui. Em")T Hardware store; Hotels, motels; Medical and dental laboratories; Movie theaters; conditional use permit required subject to Ar- ticle 10; Museums; Music academy; conditional use permit required subject to Ar- ticle 10; Musical instruments, retail and repair; conditional use permit. required subject to Article 10; Newspapers, printers; Pet grooming, no overnight kennels; Radio and television stores, including repairs; Restaurant, drive -up, drive-in, drive-thru, or walk-up; tional use permit required subject to Article 10; Sporting goods store; Supermarkets; Surfboards (retail sales only); Tanning salon; conditional use permit required subject to Arti- cle 10 of the zoning ordinance and section 21.8 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code; Supp. No. 5-88 498 § 8-4 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 8-4 Ticket broker/sales, conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Other uses may be. added by amendment in accordance with Article 15 of the zoning ordinance. (Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, 12-16-86; Ord. No. 87-905, § 2, 9-22-87; Ord. No. 88-916, § 2, 2-23-88) Sec. 8-4. C-3, General commercial zone. In a C-3 zone, the following retail stores, shops, businesses, and services are permitted: Those uses permitted in the C-1 and C-2 Zones, except residential; SECTION 1. Amend Section 8-4. C-3 Restricted Commercial zone by adding the following to the permitted use list in alphabetical order: "Automobile alarm sales, installation, and/or repair: Conditional Use Permit required subject to Article 10; Automobile audio equipment sales, installation, and/or repair; Conditional Use Permit required subject to Article 10" • • Supp. No. 5-88 —ib_. 498.1 -Al • § 84 APPENDIX A—ZONING 5.4 Adult book stores, conditional use permit required subject to section 10-5; - Adult newsrack; conditional use permit required subject to section 10-6; Adult theaters; conditional use permit required subject to sec- tion 10-5; Animal hospitals, provided that: 1. Boarding for other than surgical recovery or medical treatment is prohibited; 2. Disturbing noises are prohibited and adequate sound- proofing shall be provided together with other condi- tions to control odors, method of disposal of dead ani- mals, and other aspects necessary to assure compatibility; 3. Animals shall be housed within a building, and out- door runs or kennels shall be prohibited; Arborist (tree surgeon); Automobile agency, new or used car sales including trade-in, may include repair and painting; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Automobile body and fender repair; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Automobile painting; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Automobile rental business; conditional subject to Article 10; Automobile repair business; conditional subject to Article 10; use permit required use permit required Automobile tops, replacement and repair, conditional use per- mit required subject to Article 10; Automobile trailers (new and used), sales; conditional use per- mit required subject to Article 10; Battery service business; conditional use permit required sub- ject to Article 10; Supp. No. 4-87 499 § 8-4 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 8-4 Boat sales; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Bowling alley; Brick and stone (ornamental); Bus station, not including terminal facilities; Business schools; Car wash, any type; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Catering business; Churches, synagogues, temples and other similar congregations; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Circus or carnival, temporary; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Convention hall; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Equipment rental, including rental of customer -operated vehi- cles, other than passenger vehicles; Film processing, including motion picture film; Fortune tellers, psychics, and astrologers; conditional use per- mit required subject to Article 10; Frozen food locker; Furniture storage business; Furniture (secondhand); Furniture reupholstering and redecorating; Game arcade, if five (5) or more machines, conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Glass installation, retail sales and service; Gun shop; • Supp. No. 4-87 500 0 8-4 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 8.q. Horticultural nurseries, commercial; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; -Hospitals, general, psychiatric out-patient only; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Ice, retail sales; Lithogrpahs business; Lumberyard, retail provided all materials are stored within an enclosed seven (7) foot high masonry wall and open storage limited to a twenty (20) foot height; Mattresses, retail sales; Mimeographing business; Minature golf course; Monuments; Motorcycle repair business; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Parcel delivery terminal; Pet stores, including sale of pets; Photo engraving business; Plumbing fixtures; Precious metals, plating, retail; Printing business, commercial; Publishing business; Radio and television stations only; conditionaluse permit re- quired subject to Article 10; - . Recycling, small collection facilities; subject to Article 10, sec- tion 10-11; conditional use permit required; Recycling, large collection facility; subject to Article 10, section 10-11; conditional use permit required; Reducing salon; Reupholstering and redecorating shop; Supp. No. 5-88 501 § 8.4 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE 3 8.4 Secondhand merchandise, retail sales; Service stations, gasoline; conditional use permit required sub- ject to section 10-4; Sign painting shop; Skating rink, ice or roller; Sound score production facility; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Surfboard sales and manufacturing; conditional use permit re- quired subject to Article 10; Taxidermist business; Telephone district office; Telephone exchange; Tire shop; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Tombstones; Tool sharpening service: a. Restricted to grinding machines using one hundred ten (110) volts or less and one-half horsepower maximum; b. Restricted to maximum of five (5) grinding machines; c. Located wholly within a substantial building enclosed on all sides; Towing service, vehicle; Trade schools; conditional use permit required subject to Arti- cle 10; Trailer, auto; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; • Truck sales, new and used; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Videotapes, eighty (80) percent general, selling or renting; Videotapes, adult, selling or renting solely adult videos; condi- tional use permit required subject to section 10-5; Supp. No. 5-88 502 APPENDIX A—ZONING Wedding chapel; ' '. Otber uses may be added by amendment in accordance with ,'� ' Article 15 of the zoning ordinance. (Ord. No. 86-865 § 1, Supp. No. 5-88 502.1 § 8-5 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 8.5 Sec. 8-5. Standards and limitations. Every use permitted or maintained in C -zones shall be subject to the following: (1) Parking. Parking shall be provided as specified by Article 11.5. (2) Enclosures. All uses shall be conducted wholly within a building enclosed on all sides, except for the following: a. Outdoor uses permitted by conditional use permit as stated in the permitted use list; b. Commercial parking lot; c. Uses incidental to a use conducted primarily within a building located on the premises; provided that such incidental uses are not conducted in whole or in part on sidewalks, public ways or within any required front or rear yard; and provided, further, that such inciden- tal uses are of a type which cannot be economically oi• practically conducted within buildings. Where inciden- tal uses are not conducted within a building, no part of the area devoted to the incidental uses shall be con- sidered as part of the required parking facilities. All outdoor storage or activities shall be substantially screened from public visibility, public streets, parks or other public places, and properties. (3) Reserved (4) Merchandise. No merchandise shall be sold other than at. retail. Sale of repossessed merchandise or secondhand_ mer-. . chandise taken in by the seller as a trade-in on new mer- chandise is permissible; provided that such sales are con- ducted on the premises where such merchandise was orig- inally sold, or any successor locations. (5) Signs. Signs for this section are regulated by section 28A-13 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. (6) Building height• a. In the C-1 zone, any building may have a maximum height of thirty (30) feet. Supp. No. 10-87 503 •§ 8.5.1- HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE : 8.5.11 In the C-2 zone, any building may have a maximum height of thirty (30) feet. In the C-3 zone, any building may have a maximum height of -thirty-five (35) feet. (7) Front yard setback. No lot need provide a front yard except as may be required by a precise plan. (8) Alley setback. Buildings shall conform with Article 11.5. section 1161. (9) Rear and side yard setback adjacent to residential zones. A minimum rear andior side yard setback of eight (8) t'eet shall be provided, and an additional two (2) feet of setback shall be provided for each story over the first story for structures that abut residential zones, except where public rights -sof -way, twenty (20) feet or greater in width, separate the commercial zone from the residential zone. (10) Landscaping adjacent to residential zones. The required rear andior side yard area shall be landscaped and pro- vided with an automatic watering system. Size. quantity. and type of landscaping shall be subject to review and approval by the planning director. Landscaping shall be appropriately maintained, trimmed, and void of weeds. (Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, 12-16-86; Ord. No. 87-889, § 1, 7-28-87) ARTICLE 8.5. RESERVED* Secs. 8.5-1-8.5-11. Reserved. •Editor's Note—Ord. No. 86-865. § 2, adopted Dec. 16, 1986, provided for the deletion of former Art. 8.5, §§ 8.5-1-8.5-11, which pertained to commercial planned development (CPD) and was derived from Ord. No. N.S. 451, § 1. adopted Mar. 6. 1973, and Ord. No. 79-623, § 3, adopted Oct. 23, 1979. Supp. No. 10-87 504 4 9.1 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 9-2 ARTICLE 9. M-1, LIGHT MANUFACTURING* Sec. 9-1. Purpose. In the M-1 zone, no building shall be erected, constructed, re- constructed, structurally altered, nor shall any building or land be used for any purpose except as hereinafter provided and al- lowed by this article. The M-1 zone is established in order to provide areas in the city within -which a range of limited and restricted manufacturing, oil and gas operations and wholesale business activities may be con- ducted. The limitations imposed upon such uses are intended to control the intensity of use and external effect upon the sur- rounding areas, and to limit land uses to those which can be operated in a reasonably clean, orderly, odorless, pollution -free and quiet manner. (Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, 12-16-86; Ord. No. 90- 1032, § 1, 5-22-90) Sec. 9-2. Permitted uses. In an M-1 zone, the following uses are permitted: Assembly of electrical appliances such as: a. Electronic instruments and devices; b. Radios and phonographs, including manufacture of small parts, such as coils; . Bakeries, wholesale; <F3�� r, Bottling; Cabinet shops, carpenter shops or furniture manufacture; con- ditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Carpet cleaning plants; - *Editor's note—Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, adopted Dec. 16, 1986, providedthat Art. 9, "M" Manufacturing Zone, be deleted and rewritten as herein set forth. For- merly Art. 9 had been derived from Ord. No. N.S. 234, § 3, adopted Feb. 6, 1962; Ord. No. N.S. 284, § 1, adopted Mar. 18, 1965; Ord. No. N.S. 317, § 3, adopted Nov. 7, 1967; and Ord. No. 85-815, § 5, adopted Oct. 22, 1985; and several sections which bore no history note. Supp. No. 6-90 2 11 505 § 9-3 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE 0 9.3 Ceramic products, manufacture of,including figurines, using only previously pulverized clay and kilns fired only by electricity or low pressure gas; Electric or neon sign manufacturers; Garment manufacturers; Ice and cold storage plants; Laboratories, experimental, motion pictures testing; Machine shops; conditional use permit required subject to Ar- ticle 10; Mini -storage, personal (see Definitions, Article 2); Oil and gas development; including storage and any and all related production facilities shall only be permitted in those areas in which approval by a vote of the people has been obtained to waive the general oil drilling prohibition. Said use shall require a conditional use permit in accordance with Ordinance No. 85-803' (the "Oil Code") and in 'con- formance with sections 10-1 and 10-2 of the Hermosa Beach Zoning Code. Additional standards may be imposed in the reasonable .discretion of the city in .the grant of the condi- • tional use permit based upon.health, safety and general. welfare concerns; Plastics, fabrication from; conditional use permit: required sub- ject to Article 10; Plumbing shop; Rubber, fabrication of products made from finished rubber; Sheet metal shops; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10. (Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, 12-16-86; Ord. No. 87-910, § 2, 12-15-87; Ord. No. 90-1032, § 2, 5-22-90) Sec. 9-3. Standards and limitations. Every use perm&tted, or maintained in the M-1 zone shall be subject to the following: (1) Parking. Parking shall be provided as specified in Article 11.5. . Supp. No. 6-90 506 9.3 APPENDIX A—ZONING § 9-3 (2) Enclosures. All uses shall be conducted wholly within build- ing enclosed on all sides, except for the following: a. Outdoor uses permitted by conditional use permit as stated in the permitted use list; b. Commercial parking Lots; c. Uses incidental to a use conducted primarily within a building located on the premises; provided that such incidental uses are not conducted in whole or in part- on arfon sidewalks, public ways or within any required front or rear yard; and provided further, that such inciden- tal uses are conducted within buildings. Where inci- dental uses are not conducted within a building, no part of the area devoted to the incidental uses shall be considered as part of the required parking facilities. All outdoor storage shall be substantially screened from pubic visibility, public streets, parks or other public places and property. -=- (3) Signs. Signs for'this section are regulated by section 28A-13 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. (4). Building height. Any building may have a maximum of thirty-five (35) feet in height and have a maximum of two (2) stories. Oil and gas operations may exceed this height for a temporary period of time and to a height as set forth in an approved conditional use permit pursuant to .the Or- dinance No. 85-803. (5) Front yard setback. No lot need provide a front yard except as may be required by a precise plan. (6) Alley setback. Any building located on an alley shall main- tain a distance of not less than three (3) feet from such alley. (7) Rear and side yard setback adjacent to residential zones. A minimum rear and/or side yard setback of eight- (8) feet shall be provided, and additional two (2) feet of setback shall be provided for each story over the first story for structures that abut residential zones, except where public rights-of-way, twenty (20) feet or greater in width, sepa- rate the M-1 zone from the residential zone. Supp. No. 6-90 507 July 18, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council July 24, 1990 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 88-7 PURPOSE: TO REQUIRE AN AMORTIZATION PERIOD FOR BUSINESSES THAT REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, BUT ARE CURRENTLY OPERATING WITHOUT A C.U.P. REQUEST: AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO REQUIRE AMORTIZATION PERIOD INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation 1. Planning Commission and Staff recommend introduction of the attached ordinance to amend the zoning ordinance. 2. The Planning Commission also recommends that the City Council consider reducing or eliminating the cost to existing businesses for applying for C.U:P.'s. Staff recommends that if fees are altered for existing businesses, that the change occur with the user fee study. 3. Staff recommends the City Council direct staff to prepare a resolution of intent to investigate upgrading existing Conditional Use Permits that do not have standard conditions at., this time. Background At their meeting of :6/19/90 the Planning Commission recommended amending the zoning ordinance to require anamortization period for businesses operating without .a'' C.U.P. The amortization period was recommended to begin upon notification of the business of the need for a C.U.P.' The Planning Commission also expressed their concern related to the impact upon small businesses to have to pay application fees, and recommended that the City Council study methods of reduced fees, shared fees, or elimination of fees. On 3/8/88, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intent directing the Planning Commission and staff to study the possibility of amending the zoning ordinance to create an amortization period. On 11/25/86 the City Council adopted an ordinance to require an amortization period for existing on and off -sale alcohol establishments operating without a C.U.P. 1 z9- Analysis An example of this type of ordinance already exists in the zoning ordinance for existing nonconforming alcohol establishments. Attached -with ._this -report is an excerpt of that section of the ordinance. e_,. One of the problems staff had with the implementation of this ordinance_was that most of the businesses that were subject to the two year amortization filed for their required C.U.P. near the end -of the period, and staff was flooded with requests. As a way of resolving the problem staff -is proposing that the two year period be triggered by notification of the affected businesses. Therefore, the notification date will be staggered depending on the priority of amortizing certain uses. It would be staggered over approximately 4 months. Staff will also strongly encourage the affected businesses to file for their C.U.P.'s early in the period. Staff has calculated, by comparing business license information with existing C.U.P.'s, that the following number of businesses in each category will be subject to this amortization ordinance (these are only estimates as some C.U.P.'s cover multiple — businesses and business license use categories don't necessarily correspond with zoning use categories; more detailed research would be necessary if this ordinance is adopted): Live Entertainment 1 "Adult" Uses (Book Stores/Videos) 2 Motor'Vehicle Sales/Repair/Rental 23 Service Stations/Car Washes Other (Snack Bars/T-icket Broker/ 12 Musical Instruments/Surfboard sales and manufacturing) As noted in the Planning Commission report some currently active and legal C.U.P.'s were granted in the past with less restrictive conditions than are currently being required and therefore could have lesser conditions than amortized businesses. Staff does not believe, however, that it would be appropriate to amortize these businesses or to renew their C.U.P.'s as they are conforming businesses. Further, there are'no standard conditions in the zoning ordinance for many businesses at this time. Therefore, to address the inequities, the standard conditions for conditionally permitted uses, could be expanded for certain uses to make conditions more consistent among all similar uses. 'As such, those businesses with less restrictive C.U.P.'s could possibly become automatically subject to the standard conditions without subjecting them to the C.U.P. review process, or without a fee charged. This matter needs more investigation and study. 2. 2 _2g_ The necessary text amendments to add standard conditions would be considered when businesses within a certain category of uses are coming up for review. This proposal does not address nonconforming uses in various zones which, by ordinance, are allowed to continue their use in perpetuity. These uses may cause as much, or more of a problem than businesses operating without a C:U.P. One way to deal with these uses is to amortize them out of existence. By law, this normally requires a 10 to 20 year amortization period. Staff believes that its better to live with such uses than to take the long and legally difficult effort to eliminate them. The Planning Commission suggested that a fee reduction or waiver of fees be considered for existing businesses that would be subject to this requirement. Currently an application for a C.U.P. is $320 with an additional $230 for environmental review. The applicant is also responsible for the noticing. These fees are being studied for possible adjustments as part of the user fees study expected to be finished in approximately two months. Therefore, fees for amortized C.U.P.'s, if they are to be different from other C.U.P.'s, should be set by resolution at the - time when the new fees for all other city permits and licenses are being considered. Staff does -not anticipate applications from the amortized businesses to be submitted before this time. Please refer to the Planning Commission report for further analysis. CONCUR: / Michael Schubach Planning Director ,_,-1,'/ i '.' / Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Resolution P.C. 90-50 3. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 6/19/90 4. Memo from City Attorney 5. Excerpt from Zoning Ordinance Re: Alcohol establishments 6. P.C. Minutes 9/20/88 7. C.C. Minutes/Staff Report 3/8/88 8. Public Notice Affidavit rkc Robertson Associate Planner a/pcamort CITY MANAGER COMMENT: The recommended plan would cause all existing businesses for which the Code now requires conditional use permits to obtain CUP's over the next 28 u-- . To • - fair as possible, staff also is propo g that we pursue of orts,to cause simi- lar businesses have the same conditions regardless of the business's age •r whether they are legally conforming or nonconforming. tl /AJ ,d_.432.Y--/ a -93 - To: City Council From: Robert Benz Subject: Emergency Preparedness for the City of Hermosa and neighboring citys. Development of volunteer fire corps. Geological forces beyond our control will subject the Southern California area with an 8 -plus earthquake within the next 20 years. It can be expected that the northern slip of our side of the Pacific plate will slip within a one second time at least 20 feet. Continent with this amount of acceleration, is a good possibility of ground fracture associated with earthquake phenomenon such as liquidfaction. This ground fracture will result in localized ground rupture and shear which can result in sheared underground utility lines. Experience with other cities subjected to extreme earthquakes show that damage resulting from earthquakes is primarily from loss due to fire and the inability of fire fighting personnel to access water. Furthermore, numerous simultaneous fires regardless of cause can quickly swamp established fire protection forces. It is my request to you that this city embark on the establishment of an emergency fire fighting capability. Our current fire staffing would be inadequate even if the fire department was expanded ten fold. The following dissertation is meant to be an impetus to implementation of a emergency fire fighting capability. BACKUP WATER CAPABILITY Hermosa Beach most valuable resource, the ocean, provides an inexhaustible water source. Hermosa Beach currently has two fire pumpers, which can pump up to 1200 gallons per minute (gpm). The pumpers require at least that amount of water supply. In order to establish necessary pumping capacity it is necessary to give some basic engineering equations: Pump horsepower = GALLONS X HEAD (FT) X 1.08 MINUTE X 3956 X EFF The 3956 is essentially conversion of the density of the working fluid and 1.08 is the specific gravity of seawater. Head is the pressure necessary and conversion to pounds per square inch (PSI) is dividing the PSI by 2.40. Pump efficiency (EFF) is the efficiency of conversion of mechanical energy into pumping energy. Typical pump efficiency can range from 50% to 90%. I suggest that the city acquire 2 "off the shelf" diesel driven self priming pumps mounted on a trailer. These types of pumps are commonly available and used in applications such as irrigation and construction. 14b The parameters for the pump engines are as follows: The head required for pumping 1500 gpm to an elevation that is what ever the elevation is in feet above sea level plus the friction losses through the hoses/pipes or other means of transport. The friction losses vary with th-' diameter of the pipe or hose. There is substantial data relating to pressure drop characteristics of hoses/pipes which can used to determine friction loss. A rule of thumb (actually I can determined the actual friction pressure drop in a very short time) is quadrupled the head pressure needed to obtain the lift. Assuming that the desired elevation at which we would like to deliver water would be 100 feet an assumed friction loss would be 400 feet or a total 500 feet. Therefore to deliver 1500 gpm to a 100 foot elevation is: 1500 cpm X 500 ft X 1.08 = 273 horsepower 3956 X .75 eff A 300 horsepower engine is typically a 6 or 8 cylinder of about 500 cubic inches displacement. This trailer would have wide platform tires which would allow the transportation of the trailer onto the beach via a 4 -wheel drive. IMPLEMENTATION: The plan as envisioned would entail hookup to a 4 wheel drive and driving the pump to a specified location near the high water mark. The suction of the pump would be piped with termination consisting of a screen guard which would prevent seaweed from being drawn into the pump. The suction would have to be solid walled construction to prevent collapse. An irrigation type pipe allows quit setup with disconnecting joints. Discharge of the pump could be connected to various types of piping or hoses. The size and number of hoses or pumps connected to the discharge of the pump would be sufficient to allow a pressure flow characteristics for delivery of adequate flow to a location within the adjacent neighborhood. Volunteers would lay pipe and/or hoses from the discharge to a location where water would be supplied to a fire pumper. The staffing would have to be sufficient to lay the required hose. This is a preliminary plan based on some engineering principles which are only offered as a guide. FIRE STAFFING Recently, there was a request of the fire Department to impose a tax to increase staffing from 5 firemen to six. Although the staffing for the fire department is presently inadequate to perform basic fire protection, in the event of a disaster scenario, staffing would be inadequate at even 20 men. I would like to suggest a working plan of developing a volunteer fire corp in conjunction with our great fire department. The volunteer corp would be made up of members of the community and would be trained by the fire department on a rotational basis. As a suggestion, a volunteer/s would work shifts at the fire department. The volunteer/s would work as another fire staff and acquire some working knowledge of the procedures within the fire department. The volunteer/s would garner experience which could supplement the curriculum of paramedic/fire students. Zt_to /9)3 r • 01 �ikrn g 4 (7otiAtry e0i1 RD supEzAsekES Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SOO West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, 1 a: writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the c`.:rr ent county _ _ � COL .. fiscal crisis as it might impact _cs Anceles County Cc=an Lifeguard services. My family and 1 are beach patrons. Any plan which wculd cut li=ecuar ices and thereby jeopardize beach 52rV ��OFc`""'.LZ= saI.L" 'v.: L'ld be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide b L' - : t reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse thepr Dcsedmerger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professsionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, ¢4-4ar7f-e't /,?o/ A 4fmosa g 4 (OUNTL 604 Of L5e,/PEE11-569 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, Iam writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles Count: Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and _ are beech. patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby eopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary,I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, `310\ v‘c\ +F�n �� cam, .9O3.s14 ATI Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, Iam writing ss you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family arid I are beach pacrcns. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge:. reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, I y(ve,04/ ,9'&c-4' a6 p-,-- ‘22 s 5'--QLS 7 A01. ' ,rmoSa gaL Cccsr ci ieC4 (10w17 y eleugieD 0f JaPe�045 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, I a.., writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are teach. pacro'.s. Any plan -1 which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the _ifecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, I i -r -k 5-J-, 4. g LArrylcscz c4 C L L o c I C4 ('ouNT 136,9RD i Suef-E11-5616 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich O 869 Hall of Administration cl0 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los .n = _ ^ - -- _ county, _ a:r. writing to you in order to e: tress my concern with respect to the current county fiscal cr_sisas it m' - ht _.pact Los Angeles Count. Ocean Lifeguard services. -' IAV _`_...__ and _ ars beech oa=r o.^.s. Any o7=nwh -. would 1 i =o. -card ser ices and. thereby jeopardize beach safety would - an_ extreme disappointment. be Given that county -wide budget reducton is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, QZ-Lit-4"4) CAV - 0 ySYLYit. cT heed. GA ATIo• Ikirnios& BaL. Co&ne ( CSI C'ouNT'/ 604RD Of SCS /JAWS lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 41600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 0/64 o/c '-3:ee9c,(---j / v_so:t 0/4 9a zs� Afit4. lkn-nosa Bak.. Co -LA -net( ep 14 (OC,AtrL/ 0,9 acSCR-S lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration $00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, i / 9y 7 /& M . 11-Vrn105a lasc C nd, ( 14 (1011/WY 1& iii O lion. Michael D. Antonovich Of 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, //iS 1100 (rvTe2eY glv� fleRrY)osq )3ediCan cA 90� • Al kvemosa Bc-k Come;1 C4 C'OultTy 6494RD Of Ste-RW(16 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • <. Sincerely, �,_)0` % o /1/n4/111- ! , f-rz- y -}-,.c.1 S u , ; 1-g— /7 G, ctL1 f7 n_i? / I ! N4--1 _ )s j c,)8.s y),4 J m? --L, J9 3u ffsGQ vc,„,., /9,7 Z-6}) / 1 /' / /Gr 69-v 4 FES rmoSct gaL C6l,Lnei( C4 ( II� VT & RD � or sjPERL/X lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 0600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, L=,44;tr-a-- c>/:' /,z4/ 1kAn1os& Bak- Cot'Onc' Iffil 14 ebelAtrY 60,90 u,YY lion. Michael D. Antonovich Of 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 - Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 014• 1kjer,ios& 13c4L Cal,Lnaidpi CSI &OCiIV I y boli Sief-EvAsolS lion. Michael D. Antonovich Of 869 Hall of Administration 400 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, bI ii /o 2) A114. gc4_ ( C'caNTY &19 Of L5UPER. 11-5(16 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, T am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach. :patrons. Any =fan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby ecoa_^ beachsafety would be an -Sa_ t� extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction _s necessary, wholeheartedlyed merger _ _ _ g dScry, _ endorse the cr.^i^..^.s ..i _ u�: „_ ..:,e ___ egucrd Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. ; firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. i eerely, / AUL Oi\f. r ,rmosc LcL C i Loc, ( CA ("ochry 6019RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Y 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: tievN,o t o� aa-ci As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and 1 are beach patrons. Any plan which would ut lifeguard services and thereby ie doa_d_: e beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the L1= ecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. _ firmly _ that this is the only feasible alternative which will e__minate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Gl (-,F1'\ 9 I #04,00_ CA-pu( Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: C �! (10 aNT'/ geggieD SUPEkU/`SQA As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My _`am, ly and I are beach. Macrons. Any clan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby _ e czar "'=. beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the~eposec merger the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles Count! Fire Department. : firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preservinc the duality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. ince OL C M Luoc_9 .. 1).6 CoL- kMx (I) qo Attention: Hermos Beach City Council Member Los Angeles County Board Member We the undersigned taxpayers would like to express our total outrage at the decision to remove Los Angeles County Lifeguards and maintenance from Hermosa Beach (effective September 1993). This decision is totally irresponsible and will result in t agic loss of life and total chaos in Hermosa Beach. This beautiful beach is used regularily by my family and residents throughout Los Angeles County and we can't afford the loss of these vital services. Please use all available resources to insure the continuation of County Lifeguards and maintenance on Hermosa Beach. We won't accept anything less!!!! Name Address City Phone 112 Z Rd taN ft 4 •v# ?— •--k(4\4f4 z C. c 7x,73 / Oz1--67///,';;c/o4 yt5 Com-. (309 /2 / 7 ' Q4#4i 4INE C ► Ath - y / Attention: Hermos Beach City Council Member Los Angeles County Board Member We the undersigned taxpayers would like to express our total outrage at the decision to remove Los Angeles County Lifeguards and maintenance from Hermosa Beach (effective September 7, 1993). This decision is totally irresponsible and will result in tragic loss of life and total chaos in Hermosa Beach. This beautiful beach is used regularily by my family and residents throughout Los Angeles County and we can't afford the loss of these vital services. Please use all available resources to insure the continuation of County Lifeguards maintenance on Hermosa Beach. We won't accept anything less!!!! Name Address City 3►��^ �cse.-b� c1 KQvr� - v' -/0? /1.7' /Gr,�f . tl k' 4,1 Po6.),c,vi, 0441 es4 'irlr/%z.__ - /5D - 4,'O`Jil+t/ 411/. A, 5 . CEJn / "3I.3 S L4 Nsie-7 k c r Vt.coe( (art t3 )3Sum -Dr-. zJ /RI -1 ��'�� Vii?/�,�� ;, S .vim e. #74 Phone Heialos 379- 733 -2 +-V SA 7e1S-IC13ci /27ti' (CC'( F, 2 2 s #1...7"76. A. //.7 G5/J /(-/v'( ((..-7/7 s Zit l 1 l G�. �r l �.r. 7-7--.2 ; Attention: Hermos Beach City Council Member Los Angeles County Board Member We the undersigned taxpayers would like to express our total outrage at the decision to remove Los Angeles County Lifeguards and maintenance from Hermosa Beach (effective September 7, 1993). This decision is totally irresponsible and will result in tragic loss of life and total chaos in Hermosa Beach. This beautiful beach is used regularily by my family and residents throughout Los Angeles County and we can't afford the loss of these vital services. Please use all available resources to insure the continuation of County Lifeguards aTia maintenance on Hermosa Beach. We won't accept anything less!!!! Name Address Cit Phone S fickW 70 C-) 171/10^.1 -ate G Cfe q 0.2 s ` -o4 I 1 IS 1100 (i WT eo Bit- V N8 c t. 902-f4/ 776 -6097 Rlc v'rtZD pr , IJ I LUAMS JR . S91'+ PrLitPio PL . HP-LEIt/JPr Hi .ct6-712— )A121o21E. M Wit_ L/AM5 '1S5 3%42'' J; 14/14(b5.9 1-3E - 90 2.5l Li° 7/)-f f32eS /t, . 7- 4 two 5 72-7 -s--2-/ R,49 -co gerer / 6 &-il 1k- f 6 ? 9e - z--7 3) -,ACCi464A-, 'V . ' (e57)1) ?-bl\ti4 AVe l4A 5Ys - q29(0 F4Aarpik f -o , f 4/b026460 Avelt. hirs7rf9ev7i V 5-A3 3)707 -}3h X21 541A — L = B HAI II y)hn MC DMr 2-Jroim 1 5+11 l4t1° -3_-- 3 83ct A (30 2 6a) •$ /7 977-,14--,0 102)77/ 3/0 7t5 na 3 <_(f) 7 5c'/-66 Ile -420-.1. sr 6' AT1 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 5,00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: SUPERIA546 As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is. the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Xat (71t '164,4i)rt/{ 0//16e'.i,XeA /lb 2-Aie.. 1 , /146 ,r4a tib',- DCI . c. =-,(1,7_ 41-ceeA/ A krn 1 CA C'oulvT y 6619 Of 6WIERJA1506 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County I a.., writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles Counts Oc_an Lifeguard services. 1dv caul _y and 1 are beach patrons. Any plan which wcul cut 1 i =oruard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. - Given that county -wide budget _eduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, evetn4 c 93y qv Lrnosa g c% CA (cwvT y &19AW Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f 6w 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, I am writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and 1 are beach. patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safetyould be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction is necessary, _T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of cur ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 6(( M&—_ - -E4i b e)Epcc.. 4 ATT 1.-Vrmo5 i ga Cc e Iie CA C7D0 f1;/ &I Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SOO West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, I arr writing t., you in order to express my concern with respectto thecurrencounty fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocaan•Li=egua=d services. My family and 1 are beach pairo .s _ Any plan which would cut 1;,reguard services and thereby _eopa=djze beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Z firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. krnosa g c-%. C'ouAti y &fiRD of sipEkvicsai6 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles ",unto, 1 am writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles Count Ocean Lifeguard _ _ _.l. _ylic_ services. MY _`a...i_y ant are Neagh pacro'.s. Any olan which would -.:t 1 i =or-ua: d services and thereby jeopardize each safety w l.:Ld be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction is necessaryT wholeheartedly endorse theproposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of :he present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ci /Yl t I'161.,661i.41 L'vrno5c c4 C c1-tAr c., ( C4 (aN7 y &242.0 of supEkvicsags Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angels County, 1 a.., writing t.. you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it :;richt impact Los An- 1 _ ^ounzv Ocean Lifeguard services. _-i--.ua- My family anC I are beach patrons. Any plan which wc_l.. out 1=feguard ser 'ices and thereby jeopardize beach safety wouldbe an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _ e^. uct ion is necessary, T wholeheartedlyendorse the proposed merger cf the LifeguardService with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism. of cur ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 1523 P1Ar44y�rti *7- kl� �4os4 5ci 7925/ \ rRXmosa ;gc C4 C'Ou/VT y 6011 Of L5UPEEVASCieS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles _ounty, I am writing tc you in order to express my concern with respect to the currentCol.. .. ,n- '1 fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Cc=an Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach. patrons. Any plan which would out 1 i=guard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide : u : et reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifecua_dService with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ! O 3 446K iter f ain 4(1(2., t lot074 1Q ' , 70257 of. It-vralosa gam. Co e I C4 £Curvy y &1 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SOO West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, 1 am writing t., you in order to express :ay concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los An-=,_ -ounzy Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and 1 are beach patrons. Any of ari which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize .:re .^h safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly r 'G � � end0 se the proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 90-2_7Y Ir-v rnwsa CA C'O6Wr y &ARD SupEEuicSogS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los An --i = ^ounty Ocean Lifeguard services. My f aim i ly and I are beach patrons. Any plan ..ttich would out lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _:duction is necessary, 1 wholehearted) endorse theproposed` mergerthe Lifeguard Y :�_� of _.i CL:ar Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, (f 7- Ce f l—Tvz ac4 A0 1 1-vrnwsa g c4.. Ce i I C711 auItT Y X019,0 sof suPEew-546 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, I a.., writing to you in order to express ow concern with respect to the current�n- CCL. �y fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard _ _i. _ ua_ services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which wcutd cut lifeguard services - and thereby jeopardize beach safety would ._ an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction _s necessary, T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, `02 ' 7-".C,i-a �.O A N 4.tirwiosa gaL C cl-t r c l I CA (ouNTY 6011,0 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 2 8.69 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angles Count_ 1 am writing t., you order to express my concernwith respectcurrent county 'to the CCL. �y fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angle = Lifeguard Angeles County Ocean _if _ ua_ services. My family and I are ileac.^. oatrcns. Any plan which would _',:C lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beacr safety ;,could be _n extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, c v''`; 1 y Aare 10'17_ 10 s--• ti •13 (3io)3794-1Gy7 INe-rmoso Sc Cc ri I C4 (CW'17 y &JIRI) 56/pEEmsciES Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, : am writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis` as it might impact Los An -=1,== 'amount'= Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and 1 are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut li=eguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction _s necessary, T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed -me_ ger c f the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, / 767 l/ / e -L e / A°1'. 14-Arrnosa gc-k 7/1 (buAtTy 66119ED Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Of 8'69 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles _.unty, = am writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it nicht impact Los An -=-1= ^oun-v Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and _ are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse theproposed cf the Lifeguard 'ice with cr^ e- S "V the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly beli eve that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, \,\erf\050, ATI" t,rmosa g4 cunei C'aUIVT y 60/1,4eD Of PERIAS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles_ Countv, I a.., writing t., you in order to express :11v_ concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it nicht impact los An -lc -Dunt'Ocean Lifeguard uc_ services. My family and .1 are beach. patrons. Any plan which would cut life_cuard services and thereby jeopardize �G `dLZ= ✓e_ .. safety would ✓_ an . extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget necessary, reduction is1 wholeheartedly endorse theproposedmerger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, (1 5t-1 ?SM+ s--1-1 i-1erit sci,cirq. A-, 0(1I.•rmosa gc-k ec_A-ncl C4 C'DuNT y 60190 of L5uPEEIA546 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, _am writing t... you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los An -z--1=.= -ounty Ocean Lifeguard services. MV family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would out lifeguard services and thereby ieopardize beach scl ety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget :eduction is necessary,I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative whichwill eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, Poidgfe (0-14 (e�5 13eacA 60k. g02-51- ATI •v'rmosa ,c Corel ( t4 (DU,VTy I? tekusegS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles = am writing to order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los An -=1 ^ounz Ocean Lifeguard Cucr services. My family and I are beach patrols. Any plan which would out lifeguard services andthereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary,T_ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, adie)0111,04Y(— Cif-}-fL, �y�on1D in ( )14an-i-ereJ-1 3lVd.. efi 90294 -rmoSa g% (ount7 y &NW Of LWEEIASCRS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County,am writing t., you order to express my concern with respect to the currentin fiscal crisis _ tAngeles - county s as :;might impact les County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan ::hich would ouc 1 i,=e7uard services and thereby sopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary,1 oe wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the ServiceLifeguard V - with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, l�a-� 61131(1�,\bQ A01. �NtY'rno5 a g c C i (D UN7 y 64079RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles - - - County, - _... writing g _., you in order to express my concern with respect to the fiscal crisis as _ might � - current _CCl;ii�.:! as t impact os Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard _ _ �i= _ _ua_ services. 1•,v `ami _y and _ are beach patrons. Any plan which would out li=e:uard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide ^L o`z reduction is necessary, T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger Cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Z firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, et).5'\(ooT co1 A°1. g c4_ C o -,.k n c, ( C A (oc r y &Jqiel.) of L5UPEE11-542 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and _ are beach patrons. Any plan which would out lifeguard and thereby -beach _..� 52:: ices jeopardize '"c12= safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction isnecessary,T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed �me= g Lifecuard the if ecuard Sevi ce with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 0'1 t-y'rnOSa g c CO -01 " C ('CCl/V77 e)oilieD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current • COL::ty fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard _ _i_ �uar services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plane which v:c'..:1d out lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction necessary,T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative whichwill eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, `A5 hi?-,TRAvi-51_ To -rmo5a g CA_ C 0-01 e (10UAtT'f &N 0f ,56Jf'fEv/5C Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los AngelesCounty Ocean Lifeguard ua_ services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would out lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction isnecessary,I wholeheartedly endorse theproposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the resent bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincere'_y, /// 4 / /07 G� A��• .-Yrylcsa. g Co4-c n I `CIN y &lAzJ 6',filEAa 0-561166 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los An7c,1c County, _ am ,•:_ _ __nc to you in order to expressconcern my 'r:__.^, '"_speer to the CL'rrentCCL i� �:'-:! fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My famiV and I are peach :,a`.__-:5.... __.. ... '- lifeguard servAces and thereby ec beach safe ' vi iw�u�___ be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed mer ger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. T. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. li--, Y-17105 a g c4 c e ( (CUNT'/ 136,9RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angel__ __•u-- 1 _. __ ..�: , _.. writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocsan Lifeguard services. My family and _ are beam patrons. Any plan which would out fireguard services and thereby jeopardize c% safety 'v: :'uLd be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide :u: et reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse theproposed merger Cf theLifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. lo Moi\i-Oey ti.r-rocr514- i CA C'ow'l y 60/9RD L5UPEE Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, I a.., writ -ng to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county in - _1 fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beat: ✓a___ns. Any __.. lifeguard se- _ccs and thereby baa_.. sa _ . VrcL_..be an extreme disappc_ntment. Given that county -wide budget reduction isnecessary, wholeheartedly endorse theproposed` merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 1044. ,aeetc-e- /o7 / 1 ��C- at ATItl tr-,,,rrroscz. Ce-Lce),II (Oc Atiy 64/91eD Of Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los kn^� ..c ..r,un-'J : a... writing order to express my concern rwith respect to the current ' county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. M}' famiv an, I are beach oa,._:.^.S. Any __.. :::L'_d 1i=�'uard ser ices and thereby -Leocardize bacon safety would extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reductionis necessary,_ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, .A7tef'- 14)7,ac_e /07/ 11.&j. B/cl A��• ir-R-rmcsu gc-L Col -Loot, I C4 (lCWW / 6mAZO Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los =.n ,=_ -_! ' a... .. i -ac t., You -n order to express my concern with respect to the current count.; fiscal crisis as it might _. pact _-s .-.., cc Cc an =ecuar services. MY 'a ' v an-; 7 a-.= beach patrons. -n`. :Lan w 1 i =�''uard services and thereby j - :_: e beach safety we C be an extreme disappc_ntme^t. Given that county -wide budget reduction ;s necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed me_ ger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 1. ' A0 -Y'rres g _ ('ouNT y &N9 of,supEEmscieS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration c00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los =.n^.,.=c 1 am writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to :he current count./ fiscal crisis as it might _.pact L:s Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My 'a V an,' I are peach ✓at_=:'.c. nv .. _a _ .. out 1 i 'cruard services and thereby je^_ a '.:,e=_h safety would bean extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide : u e _ _ =,4u ct is necessa_•' wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger c Lifeguard d e ice with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe `hat this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, AL, 1123 140q-ferty 61(}0( (7erino 8ecc.c.,L CA go2S4- ATI i- ArniQsa FC -k. Co -c() , i C ('ounrry &619 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los =_il•-c �a County, _ a... writing to you _n order to express my Concern with respect to :he current county fiscal crisis` as it might impact L:s Angeles = c. nzv Ocean Lifeguard services. My ram- -v and 1 are CGaC oat_ _-'... -my _�..wnionw. __... 1_cuard services and thereby Decoartioe beach sa=etybe an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, - wholeheartedly endorse the ,proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /QG�sr�i Ze.itClL --p. rry?c5u. %. Coam-cr)Li I C4 C DU/v/ `/ &191eO Of 6UPEE.W.SCA Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los .1,n, 'mac County, I am writing to you in with to express my concern w_ h respect to the current county �..J 'nt' fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family ani. 7 are b=.ecn patr_ns. n pLan wnion w=uld sut i i =oruGru extreme disappointment. services and thereby =s' beacn safety would be an Given that n county -wide buc ^=t -=due=r. lei ecessar wholeheartedly endorse theproposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. l firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, CZ/1J214) j44A^1;441/' /100 /city 4r11 4rni q ge.6c,hi C-4 ?025`f AfT r-ArnicSci gC% C ce)Qt I C4 (70Ultfl y 60 1ED Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles .fumy, = a... writing t., you -n order to express fav concern with resnect tJ :he current county fiscal crisis as it richt :act 1:s r... --' Ge ^ .'.1 Ocean Lifeguard services. My fa mi?v an,' .1 are peach ✓atm _-s. Any Lan ....--.. �..� life -guard sCry "eS and thereby jeopardize 'e be__.safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge: `educt_:r ecsar wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the _ifecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. l firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. LI -Li iO4c >-r- H4C.-z.4cSA CC t-, Com• 41C)&5 -4i F c4. C o -L of e.1 i die i C'o iN7y &19 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the curren t.- CCL' �' _1 fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean L_:eguar... services. My 'a -v and 1 are aeaoa -- --c . -. --•which wouldout 1_=e'.uard ser ices and thereby jeopardize beaoh safe-_ would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget -educt-or. i necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the ,proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly �bel_eve that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Ati6sy/ti VA s cOvc6-66os 415 He,DNOO L9? �eeM,oPg 1364-95'- CA• 90-0S17- All �m.Gsc� !_)C 4L. C 0-L. r Of SAERJA06 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los s County, _ a... writing to you -n order to express my concern with respect to the current 'n - county fiscal crisis as it Tight impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. Mi; rami -v an,' i are bec^ oat -:ns. plan whisn would out l_:eguard setherebyices and theeby j eopard-; e beacn sa= = y woo bean extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _e^.ucti r ' s necessary, - wholeheartedly endorse the proposed mercer of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, typo Hex frM& 4 Ave, Apt K O trams ro 1-J (n Mo 0t"4.n03x n G G Imo• J ' 1•. (1)14• If ro 04o 01.0 ro '1't1 N• rt O tt hh '1 In 0, N to oto 0 `7 • a N (U (D F ., UI ;]• I-' II ID < f) (D 11 ID ID C 1'•N 11 >'�x G n .....rt ;s' f'1 1 G '� 0 1-' :0, (n ro N I-1 n a F'• ro I4• ID n1 '< (D rr In G 'A N H P.UN n I-'• 'i rt to ID p1 C ' 1 In O U 'D ro ft N n MN P. '1 ro fl•l),'h )I a coN V ID 0 0 r 1't J 1'• II I'• 11 ro I- 0 N .A `< O rt O ID !n UI : I to ID ii < UI ID MID G V 1n 0, �n 11 - '� /1 P• ro ,rel: rJ '0 ►i to d ,•a1 c. ►i 0 nNad 1 O 1-.. 11. -'• M .q n' 0 I,. IU in p, 1-1 N (D 0 • O I-• 0 (D rt N• O N (D N' N- ro ID nI :] ID 7 1 ,. 1n :1 'b W to �' N b (n'< ID 0 0 11 !n IL ') .....1 11 rt O Ii N• HI ri- • rt • ti ro In Ii ID nI 1 1 cl ' 0 0 I( ro rt 0 Ll. N< M fi UI J J :J 1• rh 0 N (D ti V a 0 - • ro 1.. IU O ro f t �' O. �' .I f) -N rt n 0 N G a L‹: r1 ' 1 •) () rn: < a ft <(.+< ID in 1r 1 J. 1U (1 :J N. I..• 1... 0(D F' 1... rr ID r O 0 1ri 0 0 a ID 0 1.• fU .tr o :-7' N tO a fp M'U If In' ID in .tt :i L, •• O UI rt 1.. C) O. O ID .i) N G J• n. II .V :) n •r ID f\ N ff (D a (1) N ty LI. 11 1:. I., • N .cl f) rt d N c), ii n1 �� ;r ID to rt a G ID ,IDD tot ,C1 1 ►1 Ii rD n' ( mo 1 �) O (D N /-. rt ID i 1)P. 11 () '1'• IU 01-1 a rf �;. N rl 11 rh `< 1). �� .l) !n J 1<' 1 1 .. � 1�. J .CI1 'CJ (D I < ID ID ID ID ID ID 1<: rr a ID r r1 G ID ft 0. 0 . 0 () � :� O O iti :lint cI h 1 1 ID .• O 1t 11 Orh11 1 1 r l �) .1 'II () Cl N O 1 h 0 rh ID 7 ' I. .1 rt G ID '1 in nt :I1 Irr J' i• / I'1 In 0 7 1 (n 1 f, ro I, D 1.• ^ s 1_. I h ID 0 f) i 1 [D O 1� ►< ID 11 o. . I 0nib l; 1,, nM‘ pl • r• 1-' D• C: ID ' 1 .f1 ' 1Li ro N O E •1 IU • 'o I- G N n, [1. r 11' rt Ui.....1;\ O '1 cI ID ID 11 1 • N o'< r -h ID N• 11 I< tr 0. .11 U O ln�rr�;. ID ton O ro N 0'P. () N V G J a1 N0 p► (: '1 rt 1-'• ' r r ID I't (0 1-1 0 11 l], '.: J A" tkv-rno c6I,Lnc; IC' C4 ountry &o/9RD � � Ofu lion. Michael D. Antonovich . St./PEEL/506 869 Hall of Administration 600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Saner betty'. 30Lf k±i/Jkiv9s L tkern� Bch, GN qQL7i • A�� ktirmo561- g c k C64 -4-n c t I LA (' INTy &D1IRD lion. Michael D. Antonovich 0' 61.8TEVI 869 Hall of Administration 400 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 1. 5,;IvE //11. ncerLAAL 0 jLi (///-" /30,2 /cleA/4 eti/IsS�A'S �.B Ai0C0 5/wE l� 114 UcIc /V a S'71 lig • O u 1], rt $f•m 1' (n IA) 0 d t' n co ID 1/' ti Imo• rt 0 r1 Fh 11 N tL N N 0 l0 1 111 11) 1 ' U) :i 1 tt ID <; 0 m ti w F • ID ID .Q H. N t1 �' �. x n rr ;r Gl 7 G 0 rJ •� cn m a 1� n N t✓• :J m 1-'• m Nie. rD , r In G tQ UI F-' !� N• ti rt. In m at Ii (n n O 't7 m rt N n I N I- . 11 rU (1, (), r n ti w (D F--' :J lil m 0 0 r' (1 :1 I a ► ti w '- 0 a �n`<�rrolp Nn:1 Inlj C (nmMm G .r N 1). (u N j .. 1'• 1111-1D)11.: rUI.. N CPN f (D ,, r t �U r 1 , . (n (n toDo'c�R. IJ• rt. ,� • n' (0 1 in (�, ri N m ti 1-' 0 (0 rt I.. n p, rp N N j ID 1 In ,] ?, 1'• fn ›' 'CJ N D ), () (I 1n l ), t I- t t 5 fh rt N• r ( w c 1 rr 0 n N rt c� ti m In Ii c) (n N 1 r c.l 'C c) 0 ti m rr O c' (1. rD U) (: 4.(rrcS g c -L Cc�- L e) . Ile CA C'DUN'T 7 6o4 Df U13 - Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration C40 West Temple. Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: ofs :n County, _ __ As a resident Lc- a:r. writing _gig to you in order to express my concern rn f= th w _ _ respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might _.pact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguardepee. services. MY family and patrons. ut i i -'oruard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge= reduction ois necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposedmergerof the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, tztf 3�' 1 v Ikx'rnos& B C@I,Lne; ( 14 10wV`I// 13404Z0 0fSCii°'UI C6 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, kvrnios& gc-k Co'wc ( 10 14 nuncry 41410E4045606 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, T-1,0) GQYM 30 (t2 6A- �1er�- ATIt 4,rrnosa g c -L c !', i e, 1 CA (70 uPIT Y 0/9 f Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, 1 am writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My `a-,.' _y and 1 are beach. patrons. .Any plan '.thich would Cut 1 i =,-'-uard ser': ices and thereby jeopardize bead safety would d be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget -eduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles_ County Fire Department. .1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 11-vY rnosa g c -k C n e , I £ 4 (lot C'T y 6mAzt) L5uPE•eigse Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, _ am writing to you in order to express ow concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it micht impact Los Angeles Count:: Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and _ are beach patrcns. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide 'budget reduction is necessary, T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. /1 fe /61-d (\i. A NR..rrno5a g C e I ie CA C70UN7 13019,0 Of LsapEEascifiS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, Iam writing to you in order to express ow concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los An ---i =_ ^oun-'' Ocean Lifeguard services. Mv family and I are b=ath patrons. Any plan which would out lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed nerger cf the _if eguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly beli:ve that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ' t-ev( Sec o' A. $ . se I L'v rnosa g c4 Cc-t.ol c i► 1 CA uttl /& 9 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angels_ County, ., am writing tyou in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which :out out 1 i'ecuard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be _n extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse theproposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, f -iii c c56/71 -A2 c 2i /-1-ciI m 4& Aver 1-1.Z. i -t r rmosa , c- C t C (cultT/ 60 0f LJPEEU' Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, _am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current fiscal crisis` as it micht impact Los Angeles County Lifeguard ifeguar d services. - My family and I are beach Patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget -eduction is necessary, _T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifecuard Service' with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, And, WAgenVep(1er �:•�r'mcJ�z Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: t/1 (ti &NW 0 3JP&&ug As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, - wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of :he Lifeguard Service u with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. r--.-rrmosa g c- t c n-1. 1 c l I (DUN -Ty D Of LWEEMsCRS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, = a... .siting t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los An7-1 -e "ounty Ocean Lifeguard services. my fan.iiy and 1 are beach patrons• Any plan which would cut li=eguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be _ extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction -s necessary, T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ` \ 5 \Nsext7Mico 5A- �J�S� 'P)-ec- A 4Arrnosa g,c-L C n e I I C C'o uNT y efolbeD Of 51./PEEIJA5 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles C„u .zv, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los An -=1= ^hunty Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and are beach patrc.-s. Any plan which would out lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, T wholeheartedly endorse the poposed mercer cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 7o l/ sf c 2wt Ot. A� 1-iyeniosa g c c-t-t-ele i I a nrr y 6D�1.0 L5uPEE11-56 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MV family and I are beach patro.^,s. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety w oul be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, aoct_ cexy\crccuck; 101-P7 VoYcfere,9 6/14 , A “"rnosa ( (1ouAtT y 664,0 0 ' EPEE0-5 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, I am writingto order to express my concern with respect to the current county n- �'1 fiscal crisis` as it might impact Los An --=1=== "oun-v Ocean Lifeguard services. y My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would out lifeguard services and thereby jeO�ar�12= :=a= cCsafety would .^.= _ extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction _duction _s necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse theproposed merger of the LifecuardSelvice with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. v\AOS"A 0'1 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: CA C'ouNT y 8019RD Of SuPEE uASCRS As a roc i rent of Los : am writingto you order to express my concern with respect -Lc the current county fiscal crisis as it m_cht immact Los ..nce es County Oc_an Lifeguard services. Nv fati_y and 7 a_.= beach matrons. .-.nv Lan whion w..,__d out li=ecuard ser. ices and thereov jeopardize beachsafetywouldcean extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary,_ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed`merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the oresent bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Cvm 372- 37 }BGG 'l 02_54 ATI Lv'rno5ci 2c4ACc's-&. e I C/1 C'QUItT y 6e4AW Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 8.69 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles Counzy, I a.., writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My `ami_y and I are beach :.,atron,s. Any plan ,which would cut 1 i=eguard services and thereby jeopardize • -achsafety would extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary,T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly beli eve that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, AT114. r-zrrr'Gsa. Ec,L Co -t -L'), ( 4 (CUNTY 134D/9RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los A_n.•c . �= County, _ am writing t.. you in order to express my concern with resect t3 the current t fiscal crisis as it might pact 1n7....7== Ocean Lifeguard services. li_eguar. services and thereby a__ _= a_ extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction isnecessary,: wholeheartedly endorse the proposed a_rger of the ecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. _ firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which Fill eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, A01 �.v'rrlcscz Fc -L 4( £'i 17ouNT y 13o/iieD 0f PEkuic' 'S Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los order to express fiscal crisis as services. _;1-� �� _• -•,writing to. you :n my concern with r=_spect to the current - -_Cs -_' Co=an Lifeguard m'e-ht 4m=act Lc Mv-C...v and 7 are beam ✓at_:ns. Any cLan __t 1 i =c -card services and thereby jeo=ardize loeacn safety be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide bud __ reduce_.... _ ne:essar wholeheartedly endorse the pr :Nosed mercer of the Lifecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. - firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Z-& (_ Ahoro 2h 1 rrnosa Cc-��e1I CA C�OUI�%� 21AW r-�, � c-riL � % U/�� 0 ' Sj E Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, _ am writing t„ you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it micht impact Los An -=lc ^oun-v Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and 1 are beach patrons. Any plan which wc'_i .Lit li'eguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety wcl.;L3 be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide 'budget , t reductiois necessary T wholeheartedly endorse the !__..,„sed me: der cf the _i f ecua= d Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that .. ac` this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, iv();(41-eez Cuau,coulL 15Lss Pcovv, or -rmosa gc Conc, (oulv'T y &NW Of EVJ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current count./ fiscal crisis as it micht impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MY family and I are beach patrons. Any clan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. - Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, T_ wholeheartedly endorse theproposedmerger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly beli =ve that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, «��ra 72- 1Dzsi fkof 1-py'rno5a P c% cc ie 1 A (10UAtry &90 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SOO West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles „•.:nzv = am writing to you in order to express my concern with respectto the current ent coun-v curr fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My `a _y and I are beach patrons. Any plan which wcu_1- out 1 i _ eguar,d. services and thereby _ eopar dize beac t safety 'v: ibe _:+ extreme disappointment. - Given that county -4.';d=, =t reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse theproposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety cf our beaches. Jt5v4� C,� en1 / 5 L/_ /A/AL AG Sincerely, -z •rrno5a gck Cenci C'ounrT y ieo'9RD Of L5upEELASCA Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Lose I -n�_3 County, ..•�, _ _ _... writing - _., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los An -=1= ^ounty Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are .bach matrons, Any pian which would cut guard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county-widenecessary, budc_t reduction s I wholeheartedly endorse theproposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, VJoizk_L--NS kromosA. -kr-- 4-0,cr---o 54, 6 cy— 1--eArrno5a g C 1 I (ociAtTy PORD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Of LSYPEA-2-11145°1116 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, _ am writing t.. you _:1 order to express my concern with respect to the current count./ i fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard _ _ _..l_ ,Lc_ services. MY -`a'1_y and are beach patrons. Any plan which would ..:t lifeguar� servi s and :.hereby jeopardize teach safety would te an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction .s necessary,1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. A01. -�'�mo5cz Sc% Co--kr)0_1 1 CA DUI 'j &QED 6uPEE0� Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles Czuntv, I am writing tc you _n order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it right impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguar services. My family and I are beach oacrchs_ A...}• plan which would _.:t 1i:ecuard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction isnecessary,1 wholeheartedly endorse the ,proposed �merger cf the LifeguardSevice with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of cur ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, 1--“Mo5a gaL C c�-c ric. i I CA ("NW -Ty &19AW 6W15/4a 1)45444°6 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, 1 a... writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current count' fiscal crisis as it night impact los AngelesCounty ;c -an Lifeguard ua_ services. 2•1y `ami l and 1 are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut li eguard services and thereby jeopardize :.,east S be safety would _:, extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. .1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, Lgia/Y' /g/(//e7/7/ '&( /4e, 77/ eir)/1 cS� eea , (1/1 -rrnosa g% Cc r 14( CA (7s0uAtry &ORD 0f L5UPEE./A5 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SOO West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Anoeles Count_; Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and are beach patrc's. Any plan which would cut 1 i =oruard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety w :'.:ld be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, T wholeheartedly endorse the proDosed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Aff Lvrno5a g Corel I (buNT y 6401112 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, 1 a... writing t., you in order to express :1v concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it :might impact Los An -=1= ^ount•: Ocean Lifeguard _ an _ec ua_ services. My family and 1 are beach patrons. ♦..y plan which would cut l =- guard services and thereby jeopardize beach Sai.L" would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, e‘-az,„_74- l0 2 2 P0,e TE,2 AM,e,wvsA $64c,1 C4 902s5' -v'rnoSa g c.k Co -,0 c 1 I C 711 ('o wr y &0/9.0 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SOO West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, 1 a... t. , writing you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles Count_ Ocean Lifeguard services. MY 'ami'y and 1 are beach patrons. Any plan which would Cut lifequard services and `hereby eopa_ beach _ ch r = -. �. _ LZC' ✓._..l SGL =til would .7= n extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction is necessary, _T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, F'[h C� G� `l� 13€4 St 11-t rnmos a g c4A. 7/1 (7C iNT y &494w of suPEEIA542s Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los writing Angeles County, .1 .., at., you in r order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it -,sight impact Los Angles County Ocean- Lifeguard services. My family and 1 are bea.... patrons. kr-y plan .:hich would out li=eguar.". ser .'ices and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary,1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed ^merger cf the _.if ecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. .1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of cur ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincere b[0 qowd Itermo kaki ca laczt ir-vrmoSa C'ounrry 664,0 sum Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles ounty, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the currentin- CCL �:I fiscal crisis as it might impact Los _ Lifeguard ^ount.� Ocean _i_ _ �ua_ services. 2w familyand are :each patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize be_ch safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse theproposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Z firmly beli=ve that ` lam this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, hirA;*-t 9 VA LL‘ y og,i-ii;e4.1 Os. ger-if-6( 11-vrrrosa EcA. Co-t,oc, ► C C76uN1 y m9Aw suPeievAsci Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, _ am writing tc you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Cos An -=1 ^ount- Ocean Lifeguard -ua- r services. My family and i are beach patrons. Any plan which would out lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. - Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary,T wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the Lifecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincere?y, L -a -7P /6 r q 1_0144P iJle. 1;.13ICA qo' g C% C cz--ol e. 1 I C4 (70u/WY . 6019RD SupERIASYS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan whim would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposes e_ erof t e LifeguardService 1.1 ~�.� .1 JjY� with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative ,'-_ch will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, PO l . (o , , ,z, r 2 2$ &7 J7o s4 1477 // tt rw r1 if:..4/ 6_, 96.257. Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 590 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerel,y, ov-E-Y 4-erf/ igexc.1 S ,a C46- ,6/,777 L �t,19/ //207 /Q C -i/2 -c‘ f6 70 7 _170 �yE ala/2-?7 / ?1/aW Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Z(2? /V/ /7 z%osG1 *,A2 C747 PdS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 590 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service. with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 0.2 Sincerely, Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 590 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service - with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 49 S TE�vTH OcoT f{�,emos 4 Eencd CA-- Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. '+b t A ✓' fib✓ 1Zok 416.9-h► arA 2410c-14 c'A of a Z.6'4 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SOO West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 2311'L4 /A< u/14014 -40F �cv.LS •f1v/,fLqvarrJj v�caK.e,/ uvia thtio5404- &cLL,qLt, Jlotijrnc/ this ickq dorHe_ atbuf i Z rot n1 5h4)Cted by fits ' ' ,�fun�'/rfv . olucc blbeL4 Tows{ 2.15.�Etfiv£#A3 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department: I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. L_ �- ►► L.: mac, -n-, j i--1 c id7 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, IJCUS12) (02'p {-1evr/v. ow (bc)( 4er yy\, q �� Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I amwriting to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service. with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 12- Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E90 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: efr753 As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service. with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerel Z4,, /c zt Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E90 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, / ti/ 4( t LL I //� HJS • C%BL Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, #44sigie G?G sm.sr-4 Aluivitof494044 gersv Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 9�2-Ce-(& Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ictivo jAtQtw•OJti Sec...C, C_ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SO0 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, %/3 A -€465A Ley gAL- -7‘7 sok- Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service. with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, / /M Leh S 2 y� 0,0 4&„, d _ 742sy Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service - with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /o4,-----k-4-'n o%ud.��y Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service - with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, // z 7 ��-e,ele,a.-,Ca, 90-2s� 3,'3-3 L/-‘ Aft r , L C ,. ! / (nu/1/Ty &'9KD 0f SjPEEV/ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los An^=.1�= "ounty, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. fame r. Any . ?qty family and _ are beach patio s _ _an which would cut lifeguard services and thereby _eopa_d_:e beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide tudoer reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 701 21,1-€A,),, 3 (DOS/r- rr A'". Arryic5 Rc% C0-1_,coci C4 (70 ti y &i9 RD SUPEElic5a6 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, 1 am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach _..�ar� i safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, t\o' }-l-ex-rno sa Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: 0-1$ CA & u,u1V luiteD S�� ly �� As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely 1,1S' M uvttr r. L^•+:a S UL, C4. ��L(J•� �,� p, ,ate&v Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, NAL. cd 4. C19 I sr PLACE $z_ 1-ivtfrit25,1 i3FAch, cA 9oLsy Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, "V i� /7i -d- 0/9 702 y '/ '/)3 ems., 14, 4 -(A4 -1A --0-(-44's‹) Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. /44(t'Al-, E-OvJe-^11(7-, -y 61) (0*0.x40,-4 7):?.ck.A 3/Gs%� Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 61AQ,ct/ kek'rnv�#u _.or,tn, 4r rOc a. (c ti @ 0,0L.n c 11 4- k 00-tk/t6 ,LfeArC Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. / 5jS -1 �2.��/`ov, 9v Z„Sincerely, SL 1_ /79z//' 6 «0 ()/ () 0/1 776_ Seul o L� 77,t& , z ,9,G1 /v GDS! c9 -4-44,41-4-4-e= -%�d-`/ Hon. Deane Dana 822 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Dana: .�/oP/y.3 As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Z 6%? -3 *erili q. /4-1-4 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 2ut - wo2-- - ti 14e)wo-- VOLdA c64 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: Vc?" /9 3 As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincere l, / l '/R 5,,v /75 /lG' o5:4- 6c// 5 /- AL Com- Hon. Michael D.rAntonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 1, Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, • 'I�vrne5At, fe.4.u/1� CSP - 1, C04.44149 rd SCLOA U a -A �xw�o�a lea c� @cid 001uuns i I Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, A4'4 /D LA l41.sll�,�� R,zez / d Js L4 0 ei vv\- SL.g./..,1,Lc,a-44_0 geirrn vsa f3 e&cd,, Q C -t I Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, IA /0 22 %list///4--6/4t,✓ 4v� ;274 6-4,4_,t_tg 04; d_tteA,--,t-cA-c Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /r.a £tt, -fS`79-_a.pf.P Jevwsa u Cis' lei 3 r Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. `tfi/2/7fr aohie 2-/z_ 7s --A 41.97205c7 th9c 9bZSY X14- teit_etILL.6e Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: Fieri 3 As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 111 fit • 0,3 Lo ,r-edityr,..) -kaA•-t._ 664 t C q,Zry 446: ,.46,)11.0.., &LI (211.,/ a,/4 I4iLk Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 6 (12,4441/tif litce k�evvho,o�- 6cotau k&9- (4 90.21 kYrYcS.L g c-ZL C e -t. t r) c i I £ 11 ('t INT 7 &9D f LJ/ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration sv West Temple. Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a reside= of Los=.;,7=,-.== County, : am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Anceles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MV and I are beaon patrons. Any .an tion would out lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, r 54.41114.- ,p2/864 . Aff Le,rmosa. Bak.. Co,. &n e l I £ 'i ('Dult'I y LD1► lion. Michael D. Antonovich 0f SjPEuk5 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 9_,-2 a-7(7-4,-) ,mac i-fe,+-mom leach r►c j Hon Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: os/02193 LA coua/ry 60A,�A 6Y sUme/eti41)125 As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Hiatet 4— J. S e ireS4 \Ae co.° PSN Y"mcsc.L gc-. CC-L.Loct I LA eD icIry 4RD Of SSP Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration F40 West Temple_ Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Lcs L - - :1 n S County, , _ a:r, writing t0 you in order to express my concern r with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it nicht impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MV fa-_' and _ are beach patrons. Any :.an 'w• _ would 1 i =�"uar : services and thereby jeopardize beach safety--:: -be an extreme disappointment. would Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmlybelievethat this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • SiVicerely, 610 /zathevE 11-VaroSa gc-k Ctnc1 I CSI eouiVT / 1304RD sieER1150A Hon. Michael D. Antonovich T 869 Hall of Administration 600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 69g6L 2011-15) A L105 gc . Co tnet I 10 £4 ebeavTy & i Of 1/451e-Evic546 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 3g/Lidet,� " • [1-vrrrosa gc.k 14 C'ouNly 60 RD Of � �61.1Pf-Evic5616 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 400 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sinc //6 "7/#5-F Hca sa 6/;-4a cx-L ��sy ATI 1-1-vrmosa Bak_ C6lAn C i C4 Oc iNT y MIRO D' 61.0 "546 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration A500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, /1/A KESLE(� 610 MANNR7"rAN Avt HEKMQsA cc\ 2025,f Ik,er,ios& Pa‘.. Cine; ( 10 14 'OWVTy 497t1040e14606 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration al500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, 11" /10/0 (4(d1;3 164011 &AA) at- • A - Ik'mosa gc-k Co-tA-ne, I C4 &ouNT y &94D ��,� Of CC'',, !/. X lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration A600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. ti Sincerely, 2u l_4- rvvvo c. A i, mvsa gaL Cn i ( 14 001IIVIY 6019RD 145'' lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration A500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. /-47`111*--$1?-iti/ e4. 9PAry ittin11°50- BCAk. Coffinct ( fCil (0W4TY MIRO Of U45 S lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration X00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 9(8 Pe-, s), I1.e�cfoe kverios& p c k. C alAn e f IC4 C�DuNT y &DSD � � Ukate; Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /1,Wede/ • M 1 L05 RCA C in e t 1 CSI eouNT / 6o4RD on. Michael of s U�s H 1 hael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, t 3 a - -7 mo n �rLISTI/� v` At1(4 . ktlemosa gc.(ti C6AAncl IuN1"� $�or9f � C� �o� UalS lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration ,600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 530 v"1.q-1fi•44/ �� P�v Svc 374 c3c qc j M gc4L Ccinei ( £ii (Oai T y MIRD OfSC/PERO-5616 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration Np West Temple. Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles C un zv , _ am `"r ±. inc to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact ..os Angeles County Ocean L:reguar d services. !:v `a V and T are bea:n patrons. Any _a.. whict would cut 1_=ecuard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would : be an extreme disappointment. E V Ery O� QV R^ LI FE 6 ADS S4 VE LIVES No PREVGN't EN7UR.N �J irT WE rtNNCrT 1CN1l6f3. _\JE Neel) 'Mel t .e E2.1 iL/VC( A ISD 1 HEiit escA SC Given ,...ct county-wice budget :eou.t_cn :5 necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed` merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the on•_. feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /./o) * \? r 44144-(124.21(.0004 Aft14‘. Lvirmosa c -k Cenci 1L4 ebancr y &ARD ��p 11546lion. Michael D. Antonovich 2 869 Hall of Administration 400 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 N. Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality andprofessionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 10 a( ki,u,v-67 rcl4 timU{e,cy fJl�d itkrrres . P4_ C o, L n e ,1 C 4 ec untr y IWC Of 66/PEE lic546 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration ce0 West Temple_Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Ln7,== County, _:* it a writing to you in order to express .:,v concerti with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MY =.=m_V a.-. _ are beach oat_ o ns. Any clan 'v:t:_.... " cul 1 ' `�''uar : serv:^.es an.'. thereby : e .. :par_:= beach sa ezy would : •• extreme disappointment. be an • n Given that county -wide budget reductor. is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalis;, of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 3/z, x tor -J1 64.,‘ J bzs W o trA,rts F m ►-, N tit t1 t1.,n03x n r r O' 1-'.«-r ;; 14. m I•. Ii m 040 01 O m 01 'ti N. ft f) Tr Ih't N 11. N (n 0 l0 ID (D N N p' I• I i ID C (1 m H • DI 1�• ID ID 'll I'• N II )3' E x r n rt:r0 7 r '~ n 1-• ;>y to m a'M I-' n a N• m I- m N '<: ID (t to r to N N W ►•'i rt m M C 'i In n U 'U m rtHn itN N• 't m n.(1•Ih • Ii a m I• M n 0 t' 11 J I'• pt I'• ii m I.3 0 a tq `C O rt O ID to N ii to 1 i C tit m lit (D CP a C ()N I , 0 '11 ' 1 1 : (n '• I i In UI 'Cl a N rHI �P. • fu 0 t •. N ID 0, ti N m 0• L7 '� rt Imo. (1 N N in ID LI ..1:,° N to 6• �' 'd N to cin (11 01 (1. t r :l t t ill rt O tf 1n• rr (--- z0, PI m In ti () m N I -i -1 IC n O ti m ft O CI* ID in r :] :J t•• h, O (D ti O f. NI.. IU p N (t rt CL N '(l n 0 t... (-t a O Pop 17 N r rt `G r1 1U rt :J (t IC.. a 1-•• Ift C-•. • C (D N :r t :J" N r o o a' ti t... 'a t, Ii In �1 Ii .1., .• 0 m a ,,� I ( ID n1 Cu 'I i : J :1 I� "� N rt z PJ•�C) tti. C) n In ^) G (1 i U r ID C"••••• (i) 1— m At II) () tr u., (I t •. t I-.. ft I-+ In C ID Cl ' (1 It) O N f) rt d (p (). 0 DI f) ( I In n C r ID ,d C), tll 'tl N ID rt ti ft ti ' it I11 () Ii f)C. M N Imo• rt tt ID ti :J :' IU () N N (1. •1 N r �< n 'r< tJ• t,. J U 't t .. �° .i) •q C► m I-• ' (D ID ID t 1 ID Ip r t rt a ID a • ' U In Ii Da () '( (D rr C •t, ID rt - tr:" N A, U O 1 ID ,, t 1-1 O O 'O N : 0. N • O f. rh ►i ft :� H • f ► tl U V a U o O (n t'• -J :1.4'1t... r G ID j IDh N (II rt :J• c N rh > J I h N ID t. • 0 1 .. a O 1'� til z 'D < 1' II1 It'. 1,• ]' I" rt ~ m tr: ID N n f: II ID Ii I() l LI m j..m ►.II (D ID a r,:J (r to m 1.,. n, to r N I-' to U t 1.. O I• r 1 O Ih ►-h ID P. 11 ,< V I), 0t) U 0 'b.7.°1 to rr C. m r r r O m N '.r t•'• n N r o rt a n N I: 't rt ►� n Tr ID rt ID I -I ;1 0 a.'C J rk Hiesv gc4 C0,010_, 4 (10aNPy 130 1RD SUPEE1)45Hon. Michael D. Antonovich D ' 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons Any clan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 1SVEi41/41\liCpee�'d�w qr^' �Y�11 Aff i -mics g L 4 (1OuNT y &019L Df illef-E11454116 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. F My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. P LtA4 qxt- 1/410u -I-o 2¢0.0-1 We ►.tit! -bwtn,- . -T-62,1-14tri)* Sincerely, Coz 5-'' ST Z NE2MOak bFAai WL. ice St1 r. �I) S,,'C1 •.I L: (1) 111 O O t.1,>,0 40 1 O I) •, 1 I1 u • ,-1 �) alI ~+C ' } n9['. Sa1 11 UC) IJ 1" : '- rU 0 O • o C ) 1- I • . IJ W >, 1) r-) 34 W a{ C 1.). t UI ) c" )I N c) w 1) 11 1.1 , I 1 v al N 01 rt) O 'r 11 f), . O LI N a) rI U O CI)U 0 IJ r_.)..-4 •.-1 •r1 > 4J ra > a O [' C, S l 4l C 4-1 `) , I J J • O J Ci 4 -;to N 00 4J >Oe , •ri 4J 4-1 • 4- 1J CJ • to •r-4 a: r •rl •,-I r1 a) U) Q- • b� U o 'U+ al N 4 R. (1) N 1-4 /r I al il, cL"s) a) 4-1 W N ;> h Q� ul rd O H •--)01 rt1 • I � I. -I N �4 (I) 40) U W 1 •W • n, r1 U • 1.1 ((1) Ol O N N 11 U) 1, O WO O W ), •1 W xoo� a la 04 a 1 1 [: 1-) a) 4) a) $) 0 :1 N 0 (U I) C,' I) •r1 1' N W O «I � � J � N 'C1 .n r, 11 1 •r{ a1 '+-1 11W 0 'U III(J1 > ',24 p. O I la a) ,I i 4 OW N) 1 'WI I W r{ NW~1 111 't1 ..-1 a) N • ( al .L1 rl +c ti;i' (. o a1 >,•rl 0 01 4 r UI .,.+ I: S 4.1 N A 1. fl.) -rl .-) 11 0 U) W nN I a) 4-4 .0 4-1 (• 4: J~ .,I N 0 O [1, 'l) 0 11 N IJ i-+ 44 ...1 i.nl 1,41 s °'o C: (1 0 • U'O «1 't11 G• a) bp r, a) a) a) > r1a) Ul.. r ) , (1' 111 •. 1 11 rU !1 4 1 >, )r I1 { r+ (: '1{ a1 )1 1u N •rl N a) O it, 11 Li N 11 RI IJ al (' s , «1 Q. 1 1 11. t11'0 al a+ 7 '1 C 0 N O '(1 a) O 1J U Er KJ i). . i C) a, N W —Pi •1) In u .[ O n 04 —4 C 1J Uhl n1 (1) ,41 0 [., .- +U CP a1 «l S1 1 R. �, A r: 11 17 al :i a) 1J •r+ U) ---4W «I �� I .c. N a) > [ $1 IJ•>1IJ N U fa 1J 11 0 a) •,-I W N C ( N U 4-1 > N v )-I Na) 1.4 W Fi 4) 11 N a) )-1 ro 0 N 11 o ,U a' ?1 N 41 r: al N (1 •r1 IJ U) LWj1 O ai :1:+ O N 4.1.1 ':,. 0.L':>,ry )+ 4 0 D. I 1 r'+ (1) 3 • + al rU 'U (n .11 'In U) UI a) 0 IJ 4 >, 01 nl I C: 11 -. O 1) 41 '(1 '(1 a) 0 •r1 N 4011 11 > rU W N J 11 -+ :-: 7 U .r 1J U i L1, al , , a) 1rl rU al S-1 .0 N .-1 al rU 41 11 0 IJ •r1 01 )-1 a) rI X .1.1 —4 U U -I 01 .. 3 4) 1 .0 0 ATI Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los kn^=' =- County, = am writing co you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. M family and Tar=- b=ach -ron=. Any pl=n whicn would lifeguard services and thereby jje^: ar..._:e beach sa-==ty would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge- r_duct_on is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the duality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, C . 2125 k ' 1+6,-rrz Pry. Mos e, ge.A4 . , GA '10 2..S4 F., >,'C1 I I I . 1-1 al 1) al i) )-I 1 !J ►+ :1 N O N 11 r i [' N 11 —I _C.' NQ) O J U U (11 ;� ) J (J) l''%. O 0 Ch O •C) ...-:1)+ r%al `+-1 , U al 'U N U) �i ❑. I c) J'II' 1 c) '- I (n (1)rl ri 0 al ) I .-1 N Q) (1) al C C: :; (.) N (U rl �. r �' 01 al , 1 >, 1:(1) (n .- 1 IU •, I I U ,: 1) a► >'+•• 1 O 1):1 '1 � (J "j W 4 + "U 4 1 �- .-- V� (1 F= j•c: C .r• ,1 u1 O ^�s rt) O O l!. O O (! 1 + JJ 1J 4J O {+U �.•U 1,41 y t7 0. 4 v� T >, U I al 'U )a C• > N iJ 1, al a) r) al n►' at .r1 �I lal C Ul UI $, IJ IJ N r+ () a► ': )1 rt1 r: i I UI 1 �+ U) a) ii 94 EZ UI .c• O 1' �j' tij 0, •0 )L-1(1_,,111. 41 U _I' G U 11 1 .1 c `y (Nal [►' N () ' () •.-+ C JJ ul �- r1 C: E). rtl a,•�1 i ( 1., N O' a) _ U O O1 U u) O 1 C) al > al J� ••, 1 UI •. + 0 .41 IJ rU 1-a O .0 S i 1 J ?, I) N U 1� ++. 0 CO 4J •,-1 0 U (P (U 't) 1 J . N 0 4-1 H u1 • [ E So 4) a) )J 0 , N 0 sua1 ; 4J (a )-I 0 4-) Es r ( o a► >1 u) C. N U) •moi d L: UI I: al C 1: a) C a) • E~ ai N )-+ CI al fil a) (f( CI 'u al �, 0 O r-1 Ll .r/ ,0 1.4 11. la Li) ,-1 0 . •, I a► ;...-I I Ill N 'Cl U) t: a) 44 a) u) ;> ) I Qi U) t : U) UI al O ,IJ G >1 CP (U O H a) )I I nl I C: 1 1 i] O O a) H a) N )! 4I '(1 'LJ a) )I •r1 N 4-4 U CI ri N IT p. UI a U al >, rtl a) •I U) (a 1S U •rl >~ •, 1 N Uri Z, 1 U) .: ri U �: 7 E C) L: J U E>+ N ,1 CP al a) .rl N )J a) O > a► ) I ,--I •r. N -i a) N C11 O N N '(1 UI s I 4J i J 0 1.) •.-1 0. 1 a) xCou I -I 0 0vJ (I) r+ v 3 3+J'O >a 0 ATI ? ,Y r icsa tr c4.. C c t- o C i I £4 C DU/ V/ L/ &9ED Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, ; am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los A. oel es County Ocean Lifeguard services. MV family ans. 7 a e bea cazrcns. Anyclanwhionwould out lifeguard services and thereby jeccardize bach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, CP qavsi �14 19RD Of ,50pEkvisci6 p rr �t � `/ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a reside^.t of�. c'. ae CCU v writing Los ..nc _' am �-r_ __ag to you in order to e: cess my concern with respect to the current county f=scat crs_s`as it micht impact los Anc_ s County Ocean Lifeguard services. M i-. and : are beacn ca -r -^s. Any plan which would ..ut lifeguard services and thereby je^par_--e beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that J county -wide budge- reduction is necee ry - wholeheartedly endorse the proposed .merger of the Lifeguard Seryice with the Lcs Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which willli e .,,ina te duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, I �{ �'�1,h.Jf �` J1q1 I'-�,•�(YiGS c.L I:i C'I�L.. l.. !�- L r� C � ( � T! C Q Li/ w / 1.54" Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, , am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it nicht impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. Mv and 7 are each at ons _an whion would 1 i fecuard se_ ices and thereby jeopardize beach safety would extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 4azuk,ii Tvvmavry 4as a=d S�t- i auumose. Ad), cam..• sa a sy ATT t�--ArniG5L2 -k C0,010_, I (.4 (burn. v' `/ &19'€ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean `ecuar^ services. My family and I are beach ✓at_ ons. Any=Lanunionwould cut lifeguard services and thereby di p je:arze pea...safety would . sa= wo - ve an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge_ reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the` proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely P4s.1/4.43---TuVIAIY\\ 1••ts L �^ Atit.rNa A 13 ci-A qoL�� ATT �mos� g c -L Cc CA ung y 13619RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My '-m-'y and T are beach ons. Any an cut lifeguard services and thereby je :pard_ze beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduct_cn is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, tac?c 7� Ce_ 01\•r-�(yiQ5� gc-L Co -I -Loci I CA ftN77 13,019RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it richt impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MV ilv arid'. I are beach ba..r ons . Any olan wn:cri would out lifeguard services and thereby jeoba-d'z beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, - wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, (11!$5( (&J II:014 1044.0--C1 /ciPvr'IOY# A4*j-� `eT O Cr 0. rt r F (D t-, N t -n 0 CJ t-' n co x 7 (� G G I� �' ( m 1... II m O O m O m ti 'd P. rt 0 (t r h ti N c), a N 0 �O `l ID ID I-, N :J' I� 1i ID C 0 m ht • • a I-•• ID ID tq 1'• a Ii >' G 0 rt :J' (,) G 'ti (. 1 '� (n m N n 1-' a i (1) I-• ID ID '< m r r u) G tI N H t✓- I� 1i N m D, 11 N O O 'd m rt t-• O t n a :1. I i (D () 1), ton, t i a m t✓ a r-• rs to `C rt O 1U J to N ()i U) (D t L N m I n m I/ G N (), a N, t' X qj ID 1-,• - 5 1✓ a i mIs" I� r t ID '() 1 i I N" tD N 1d ti O n k; :�' 'd �<; I.,. 0 n t-• a C7 Q. 1--' I n o 'p ID rt 0 1• • to to O, n N (D H •r - (7 (D i J t.,. () N (D :r. N In N IJ m C1• () 1 N 1). (r 0 fn rt N. J �, • ,r1 ti • N ID ij 0 D N 1 I 1 'C O 0 ti m VI 0 rt (� Q. N •c r n t7 N :) i t ,. t -I, (D ti r • O m t r rt i), D, 'l) () 0 I' rt w 0 • rt n • O to G (1 'c; (1 11 :3 0 t-, C a rt < r. m 1_,. N I -.. `rt 1n ID fit• I.. (D N .Y O J J' -- i ID 0 m Q a (p ,-0 7-1 (1 1t1' ID a '0 •i '!) ,. 0 N rt J I-'• O•V 1) N 'l) IV • J• r), '1 'd :3 O tc: ID (J•) I-• (D N IU U t3 • _,. , (1 1 ,, I -, 1- • t r C1 1 a N r n1 •Q O I t N t. ID (, ;i in 0 i G m I), •c) G ID (1 ti rt DJ ti ri .N �1 (It D' t) N r1 () m N 1-,• ID p, a 1i ID (1 'J 'I1 ID O IJ �^ •� I t l ▪ .0 '1 I ). In 'I) L'1 `1 1� (1 U (1) t N y ri 0. II) to (' 1(f.:1 ! • ID 1U (t • r. a n rt 0 j Cl N O '• , h I I •j I I (7 • In '• 1) OUN :Jy III • :i ('U I I -n O r n ,p :) rt GID J' 11 (11 11, (: O s' Cr Vin• rn c j �. t n In In ''.• ''•: () tl fI 1 I (0 • I '� ID 1 I •) O ID - 1.. 'l) :i '.: 1 11) 1 1 l7 N rt I' U C: (0 1) DI I� *CI ],��' mat) s':' JiD m t.. 1� t 1 ID O , 1) I C N In I•. r). to r i r \ • NI0 u ID 11n 'd la II q p , 0 n. 1. ID 0 '< M N J rt moi.' �; U' () G G r=11 O (D N 1-'• t) N :t G :J rt a O DI I: 1i rt 1 • ti rt ID rt (D 1-1 :J 1t U.'C J ATI -Y'mosa £/1 ('cwVl7 13ot9RD of pEEU/ -S Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, _ am writing to you in order to ex^ress .^.:v concern with respect current ` .. ` "' the ur � county fiscal crisis� as it might impact los ..:,ce i es County Ocean __sec _ n services. '.y =a...i_v and _ re beach patrons. Any clan _. would out 1 i =Gr•'uard services and thereby ;eo ard_:e beach sa=e`" would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of cur ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Q f (-7 I j-\( 5r t\_7 eft ciC D-57- A rmosz g CA. C i s CA (boor/ 664.1Aw sof supEEvisci6 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration c,00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Ln^a' ..s County, _ vou in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles =:un y OC_c .__=CL'a_erd _ :i _� services. My fa...v and T art beach patrons.Any'an whion _ 1ifeguard services and thereby jeopardize ✓e. cn . f extreme disappointment. _ Given that county -wide budget reductio.. is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the ..ar^ =e d Service rv'ce with the Lcs Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. ()A Sincerely, WevLeI rnkfrey trmF`-g ec.pi_ (c cvz�4 -rmcsa C o -t ( n i ie L4 ('ouNT y $doh Of SupEELASCRS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los :n �_ r-� : am writing to you in order to express my concern o: _tn r_s:,ect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los ring -:es County Ocean Lifeguard services. My ..-...__ an-; 7 are b=•=.....- ^.S. ..nt clan would out lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _ e du`t-^r. i= necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the u_ ,:,,,se: merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmly that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the 'duality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ATI r-� rrrcS � ; c4 . Cc -t- of in 1 C ?1 (CUNT'/ 46679RD GC SUPE121)4542 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antcnovich: As a res_dent ct Los An,..7.== ''-unty, = am writing to you in order to express mvconcern with respect to the current county fiscal crss as _t m' ght impact Los -naeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My G ...-1and are beach ✓a..r-s. ..nv tea- ....�.... lie eguard se_ . -ces and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget - =duct_o': is necessary, wholehearted'y endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, re461/4, to021 novartirz-/ Att/4 I4..umnoSa �vl.�_ � i ATI D (Y'csc.L 1 c%. Co -LoL, it CA `DINT `I 66A1€1O ,50PERVASCA Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Ln7,=1.== r-c'..=c `runty, .. _ am writing tyou in order to express my concern with respect to the current county `iscal crisis as it night -. pact Los Anne' -es County Ocean Lifeguard services. MV _a -_v and 7 are ✓ea.... oat_ ^.S. Any plan which would lifeguard services and thereby jeooard_:e beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget ' _eduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed r c_ the uar^ Service v merge ` e Ti=e a ice _ with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, • 44°( oe Cc-l-cr)ci I 1 LA (O6Wr y 136P902 ._rmcSc.z Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, T am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MV f`....y and T are eachoatron. Any m7anonwould .. lifecuard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /Li V -Crrescz Pc CA 1c(i/VT y BefigRD ojejpEkvicscd6 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los An^.,.=c County, : am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to t.e current county fiscal crisis as it might _pact Los Angel=s County Ocean L`eguar d services. MV an... T are beach patrons. Any _. whicn would out lifeguard. services and thereby jeopardize reac. safety would be =n extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is n.:,,-..,csary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, #,/21e)7A-7,4447-- ),-- C/-1 • 96 n 'rkl.Nr•rocsu c% CO3t1cI le Co eoult'T y epol9R13 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los An County, _ am writing to You in order to express my concern with respec`.. current the sr re nt cou..ty fiscal crisis as it micht _:fact Los Anodes County Ocean Lifeguard services. My fc...- C... _ a- _ beach oat_ons. Any clan 4: __h would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget recllct_on is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmly believethatt this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 174llPy7rh•6✓e HUS Cxd1 Gr ?ebVf ATI _,rmosa Ec-L Co-,,Locn jeC4 (lounrly etol9ieD Of SUPEE113A6 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration F.00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, 1 am writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My fa::'v and I are beach patrons. Any nlan lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize ach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, )-tt•te.42-_S �k, c� Mt14c1 B(vcl CRDn 1/ d Zr) I CA C D INTY �IDr9Of L2/106€11-546 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los An,. �= County, T am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los Anceles County Ocean Lifeguard seryices. MY family and T a= e beach patrons. Any _c.. w.,..._.. ...... lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, P?// AVe: fifer. WA. . tt . CI 6019RD Of St/PERI/454S Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration s00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My _`aim_ v and _ are beach patrons. Any _an which would lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, )40.17-' g/0 C7kftv /1--wictv 6-41c6- ATI r--r'rresa gc%. Cc1 is I CA C'DWvT7 &»9 L 10f S,/PEEVL Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. . _an which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, J4V);p a fr tq(o f}a W o)e. Ave Hvitenosal5u . of qoZ.- ATI 4Arrrosa GALL Cr!i-c)Ci ( CA `DU/V! `I &I.A T 0 suPE,pIzr'S Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: V\ a L As a resident of Los Angeles County, 1 am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean n Li`eguard services. My and 1 are b=.ach bazroh=. Anv o'an wh:ch would out li, ecuard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _educt_or. is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the propose: merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, l �2f ?•r`05' 01 r �cL I��.S C3 10 3")-) All gc4 Ce,coc.I ie CA C70uN7y 46o19 Of japEEIASCI6 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MY fan-_. and - a_ beach patrons. Any an wcu lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety wzuld be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Scerely , I/43 7rµ1,► A%my line res/4" Sincerely, gr y 19w 3? /* Cokri'7� Ariepse ---v rr 14- g c -k C o 4. c.i C 4 C'oult"I ySUPEEIASCRS &'L Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Anc ,=s ..ty, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to therent county , "' y fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Anceles County Ocean Lifeguard services. M`; f.....__v aria. T are :Jcac.^. ✓at_o... : nv.. would _an d 1_=ecuar_ seryices and thereby __:e beach ^ -e- d _ n extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. i/fGst G4 ATT r-Q;•Y Y C&. L g C4. C c -t. t a c t I C 4 (0uAt ry 13DilieD Of SUPEE1)4546 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antcnovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County I a::: writing t.. you in order to expressconcernrespect - - - 1V with _O the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. TMJ _a...i_y and I a -e beach _ s. Any plan which would 1;1=4 -guard serv:Ces and thereby je coar..._ze beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -Glide budget reduc-_on is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Servioe with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 't Nuti 6t-/kt: kiit„iovia 4991- Nu) tieN 51,022rh'Ifie„. 1 itc4/1 L't L -in) I��.u, avt)��"F"� �� }yl cvic�l L�✓v1 \t),. /Le 11 14V- RD A01. r-vrnicsa Lc% Co -t -Loci I 4 ('C I/VT / 60?1 PEE113-16 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration O0 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My fa -i -y and I are beach naz or..s. Any plan ;:'.._on would out 1 i=or-uard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety wou_d be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge- reduction is necessary,_ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed �merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, L/LL go 13 %NS O .4 /10// 4'' sTt4 -�--- /yc•co S,q }sc.y ATI I Toicsa gcL Coi r, ( C4 (CUIV7y 6019RD SUPEEIZORS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. &ip 0\1.I k.ArrreSg C'OuNI y 6019 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget :eduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 'a% Alm Q3:3 4 (Le - C/471 Aft r -vv rrosc g c k C o -i -c n e t t 1 f1 (lOGINi7 6019ED Dr iiiPER.115016 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, yozs."2/ � g %_ C C oal v / `/ &»9k0 c CRS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f t.�(.� 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, A&,.t, -ems AS. -Y Y!QS . g c-& Cc1, 0 r) c i eouNT y etoi9 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration X00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los kn County, - am writing toyou in order to express my concern with respect cc the current coui y fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. Mv fa i - and _ ar= beachbatronc. Anv _ wnizn wzuld _ lifeguardservices and thereby jeopardize beach safety would extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction c necessary, - wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lif T'ecuard Service with the Los -Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly bel?eve that this is the only feasible alternative which weliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, eauttS ,g143 tg, 1 ()) O tr CL rt s f; m f'O rt, O d t' n o) x 7 n r G :r i— :-1I m I-• t1 m O O al O QCs m tY 'Cl F-•• rt 0 r f rh t t to Cl, a N 0 LO a DI ID F-' N:_1' f t S ID < n(D I-( a I'• ID ID (c1 I-'. p, 11 y' x G 0 rt a' (,) G 0 H :' (n a (D N H n a N (I) r m N' (D rt In G [A N H N• r�• ti rt tom pl <: 11 to n U 'tl m rt N n It N t ,. II m n► ), , r, r i (L (D r, .r r� m n 0 �� I I a I 111 I'• t1 (D 1-3 0 a al '-< rt O (D to to :1 (n tD , i < !n (D M m G :r In 1), N U) 1 f,• .; ID Imo. . 5 H iy' D, i (D 1-,(t U [ 1 , , to iJpi to to b > 0 Cl, t J Ft) ,p n, O t a IU O. ri N ID 5 L1 t 0 (D rt t,. () (u UI (n IU I m 7 m y a ID 7 U) ,3 b 1-1-:. to �' O t 1_, (], [ I In l ). , .. rt tl r -ti rt N tl �� a 'LJ •C ID O n :J rr =J rr O ti In rt c� tl ti m IA I () (p �[ 1 1 ;1 '< l) 0 rf lD rh U a In ` ID -I) n DI G 1 1 t rn :1 a ID ti a • m 17"• ID U ID r t it i), Cl' ,q n 0 H'• rt a 0 -' II :r O < a rt < C p I �. IU it a p r. t.. F'• _' , m t_.. to 1'••` ID �.. ID U' I' ID to r o ••n7' ti ID" .0 t), (u (D ,'J ri 'c+ O LD N m .,y , i U N U a _J H- N rt J I-' U ,U () n' if) N G :7• Il ti 'U ;) n .; (D r\ to 1-' m a ID O U' kJ. to t t I I 1-'• rt to G n DI ,L. n (fit; (VD N n, Ii nl �� ;. ini h G ID , IL'U 11 f to of Il rt Cl' t1 ,i Cl) ^1 (p p' ti Ij mto 1'• rt a ti IDID: �i '] [' IU +� ,IJ a rt �i N rl �i ��,I) to a<rh < J.0 �i I-' < . IDN < ID if n. ID ID (1 `'- ,< a ID rt G �). ,r. fn rt n, n . 0 O. U is, (f In �� O It I ( O rh tl to II rt 1 .. 0 G 0 41 Cil ID O rt, o DI n rh (D 7 ' J rt G m �'1�• In:I rt :.1' : to o ti fes. Cl) .. r` m ri C) U' r'' S, j_I, I I, 1!1 I it It) ' • O n I I,• kit (D 0 H. t -' • : 1' N O t I'< it) a '.. I IL) I- t• t S Irl n Ot r • r-• U r ID ') p' I t' 'J' m N n �: ' a (1D NOD (D m r� l i ID 0 in in' mI-'n,to r t:i(t a I' (u u) I 0 I r 1 O 'U I-• < N n, f). I. in O t1 El (p (D ti r ' ID'i n'< • 1-11 ID N• tier U' t), �r� 0 0 U) tl rt (U r r r O CD N ::1' t-• rt) N :-i G a N n Cl'N r: II t t co I r ID 1-I a I 1 I-I.'<rl t - a ATI r--Q'Y rros o- Co -, L o C i C 7C / J &,9RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration F..Q0 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Anis C-unty, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County OceanLifeguard services. MY fami_v aria _ are beach cat__..e. ...'.t plan ..n__n would __t _i eguard services and thereby ec a:d_:e b ach w d be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, : wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the L._= e chard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 3/ -a.S77-1-( 57-- )-H-52/5,1 i)- 2/s4 2625-4f -Yrrosa c%_ C4 (Ou ry &Or9) Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, _ n�,-_ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it micht impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MV and _ art be'ac.r: eat :ns. Any onwculci lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safe-'' would _ d be an . extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge- reduction is nece_sa-y, _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service Lifeguard with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the cuality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /4/-7ei ()Ls -xi &-'4 Q<!) Af� '"t • g Coir ( 4 v/ y & 9AV ) SuPEEvAsfHon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration F00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antcnovich: As a resident cf Los kn County, - am writing you in order to express my concern with respect to the current count', fiscal crisis as it might impact os _-ce es County Ocean Lifeguard services. M `a_.._ :.% and _ are beach Any a^ -- + Vu- out lifeguard services and `hereby jeopardize beach safety wod_an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eductionisnecessa= wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lif -' a= d Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of cur ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincere? Ote4A-1. S3 �' ilk.. S.c, 04. r-� rmcsc z g c -L Ci Ile CA (buAtr/ 6019RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration F00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, = am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los Anaeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My familyand - are beach ns. Any cl=n would cut lifeguard services and thereby 7e^:ard_ze beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative whichwill eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Singel o trans s: ID I- to rnO t1 t•( n0ux n G G t_ I-• J' v 1- m I- ti mO O al O ( rD 1i 'U I- rt n r t r r, II to u, N N 0 Nmt-'ti:-J" I-' ti (DC)11 • -S • a I-'• ID n rt G) ID '0 I -'C• N 11m x ] G n 1-• (� to m N Haat-•:rm1-'- ma'<: (D (1 in G (flU)H-• 0 IJ 11 rt N m n' < ii to n U 'ci m rt N n tntL N '1 (D (1,l1•ilt, ti a m H .'1' ID n 0 t-' II �1 1' I'• Ii m �] O a ktl 'C rt O ID U ((E.:, n (I !� li < In (D M m G :1' to t), N (U I 1.'• ;. ID I - 5 H U' p, m 1 -' : r 't1 0(.11: I ' to 't1 to to t� �, II N i -s, O 'q ID rt O I '• ,--- iv I ll) l), 1..1 N m 5 • fl I'• () ()' • (D H N• r (D (D :J ] ID 1 1.. :] :r." t�• t!) �' I ' H n, ( l In I), Ft) rt H. J (--- „,ti a 'U (D i< to i) () J (t , J rt rt 0 t1 U) rt (� • ru ,/ S r (n n1 1 1 ( C U 0 ti m rt O a (n < rn O U) 1 :1 '1 1, rt, J ID Ii r • m ►_,. IU 0 N (I rt O, pi ,t.) n 0 H. rt a 0 rt n G ,,. 11 :r n ' < a rt < .•. < (D INn J (I i �i ID rt J U H. I-'• I • r• • m U) 1 -,.art (D (D t). I,• ID (A - O J :J' ti LI ID `Q n, (1) •'1 t 1 ID (U n, ti J .- I� N rt J 1' U ,V l) N .n M G :T (1 I1 'ti • :I (1 ;: IU t'\ (n I-' (D O, IU O U' -,. (1 1 ,. 1 Imo- (I 1' b) !:: (1 N ,c7 n (I L) O, c), I(I (I' t ' ;r In n 7 t- G ID ID O,.(1 ,(t I I O m rt. n, ( , t1 ((, ') Si) 1 i n' t O p (n U) I-' (i, a) 'Ii i) l 1 i pi, ii :x• ID () 1-' N ff rt 'i ,C n •` 1 r t fU 't (n ,I] ,V :1 (D 1:::.:::,.:t. J ID IU ' 1 t, (D (p r I a t ID I ' '< J IU rt i GI I, ID it n, n O O U” UI rn'U t o I t ID ,' O t l I -I O 11, n r ID 1 ' :_i rt G (D ] I / U) w < :J'Fi (n 0 1 ' • (11 t n tr 1,. rn s., 1-, r a in 0 n, 1 ID 0 1-'• i< ID r l • 1 n IL I -' 11) J 1 ` ID j. 1 ,• n n, t -. U' C: ID O 111 I i �rJj 1' m N o •1 J ID m H I 1 (D () N ~' (D I- • t), to c: t ' a r t C 1-' n,r IhrtO 0 I i �1 (D ID ,1 I ' ID O '< r), ID J f t I i •-• U' t), to 0 0 I (I) G G r 0 ID N :r I'• O N J G :1 rt N n N s: rt rl II (t ID r t ID 1-I U r t h•'< UI'. r '.,'C1 1) L~ ,-1 a) IJ a) J) 1-4 • +1)1, :1 ,d 4)Nii1: I_ ,� O •rI ,1; N N 0 0 0 0 aI •.-�I)rul O O CIS (1 .0 '"',, _CI a1 ,+-+ 41 I) () C $_i ' J U) 'Ii •'- al U) 0 a1 s, �l N •'ulr'l N CYL1 t 1 al (I ;i U N W rl J~ ttI () .I: +1 al >>•�1 0 Ul „ 1 ti 0 .r li ill U+ •'I .0 a) 4) ca) 4, U v-, `TVC 1 '1 Crri 1.- ul O O O 1) U , Ul 11 4, i 0 ca,44 O { ( O 1: 10 U 0 U 'U !) al `� )J a1 ) >, I) U 1 UI 'LI (Ui C' > (d )J I, a) a) (, al al ai �, r� U1 s. tI f >, ,, r UI to uI ., )1 I, 1, iu •., IJ la aI �, C: ) , UI ), •�, U) O ) i O ,U + Li N }, �, �I C O ) 1 0. (1 C). al ,tl 0 ,:i(11-1) al 1 i ) rt) ul l0 ,�) 1, U O, 0.. �, ,,_:::, N t1, N () >, () .s{ C aJ H r_ c: n. n1 ,� a) s, ft. N N O ',, u) .[' ii) 1, . 1 ri t�, >,.Ca c ), U c .r: l) U I i) a) .. r IJ . U) •'-1 N • ,:-.j aJ N ,-1 0 .c' 1 i 0) + : , 1) N U �+ aJ 0 N -IJ •r-1 O , 0 0, ul �) IJ 4) N 0 4-, U) J r 4-1 a) C: G - •, 1 r. C~ (n 'C) O aJ a) P 0 0 >, Is 1 , n) a1 a 1, V! N a) r ��' JI O G I) C' I' fi ,(1 U) 1 0 .0 a{ >+ U) G1, N 44 C Ul I• al C: a) G .,-1,-tel U) U) U) n) O •'1 IJ 01 0 a1 13 0 4 p, U) qi (11 1l, UI I' I i E). I J.i r' I al ; N -I --1 al .•. •,.( ( (1) N 'Cl (n .r a (---0 a) 41 N UI %1 Q� U1 1: in Ul 01 U .IJ r :>, LP n) • 1 r 11 i_•7 O U N J it ,L 0 H ,-I a) (11 iI . 4, '(1 'U a1 1,CA ••1 N 41 •C H N tip a, UI , O N :'. N N 1 N •,l N U ,-{ U N N v) F,; rI O : t r U —1 aJtil 4U a x 3 � F, N n( 0' al al •rl U) C; G al 0 N N '(1 U 1, 4I II 0 IJ •ri 0, 1-, a) 4 0.0. a) CI •• I N -.1 .0 —I .c ;J U i ca u f-7 0 0 4 I U) ,- I (1) .. :s 1J '0 .Ia 0 ATI Iri4LArrocsu Ec,‘, c4 (icuntry mlAw suPEEwiciA Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: cf Los =^,^c ac --V _ am writing order to e: cess my concern with respect to the current fiscal __ _sis` as it michz _. :act ...os Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. Mva...:__ and __ _ ='- -.._Any =Lan which would ..t =oruard services and thereby jeopardize beach e '' would be an extreme disappointment. Givers that county -wide budget Yeduction _ s necessary,rV 1 wholeheartedly endorse the .e oer of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department.iv.T. _y believe that this is the only feasible alternative whichwill eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. MAAk (0 Wily and S1:7 Ne+► s'4CJ'.) C14 C g DAy 3/s/5 -7-.5I ":3/31fr.1 3 Sincerely, rm�s gCL Cctice)cl, i C4 (7cwW y &0z.€13 Of ,51,/PEEVASORS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 5.00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antcnovich: As a resident of Los kn7=,1 s County, am writing you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los Anceles County Ocean Lifeguard services. Mv T a_ e beach oat_ ens. Any _an . ... _n cu_d cut 1 guardices and therebyleo ar .� beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide :Lacet reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /?417i/0.7 ‘3-4C A1T 1-.7.-yrroscZ gc%. Co-t.cocl 1 ,f CA (7DWV77 60J9 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County,_t a:�. writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MY .�.. f^_.�..ana.. 1 are boa..._. pati _':S. Anv .. __.._^ would ^ 1 ' feguardse-vices and thereby jeopardize beach safe- would bean extreme d_sapDcintment. Given that county -wide budge: reduction is neceS' wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of :he Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I f i _rely believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 5K� @lo Amoi, C: >.'c3 1) r I -I (1) i-) a) 4) )4 1' N (1 •rl .C: N a) O :J :J (11 1) N I o 0 CP C1 .Cl >� 1, �( al `-1 i >� U a1 • I • 'tJ N h q) ' ►i Sr 0 ` (),J4I ) J N )rl Q.N J ), C -a •• U a) 11 .- U1 j •r� a) al C 1: ,i U N U1 r rI �.. U 1i n) (1 al 'J r•.> -(111•:::: n rI 1) U o I 1 ll) 1• •. C. tP r l It1 I'1 1 UI ., I [; O N 1j 11 [, IU rl r--1 )1 U) . 0RI N o 0 (14 Q 1) O 1 111 11 41 ii1 1>n p' U • (14 1 1 in C: n O O • U 'U >1 U ,--1 UI ) ▪ 1a [' > 11)` ,,va►r,al alai a) 'N tlUI [r,,II'',)rUr, t)n) ,zC: li1UI Sr N �) �, Na) 4 CO[1(,nlUI1:rU}1CI initc:icur 11 0 n)11 1UI 11) U)lQ)l- 1U N ,.:(21"; N U' U (1 �' () •,- c a) N .-4 rC: n.:. IIIU( , UI I r [L, a{ r(13b1 o ,.,: ni .[' al 11 :• I n. •>1.11 r. >� .r. o ,c~ 1 II al ::t a)I j •rl N , (11 Ili > 1-) O .c: ) 1 I) >. I) N0 )4 41 O IU 4) 4-1 O1 U t1' IU 'U 1i -1 a) O (1)u 4-4 .- N C o a�a�la o O>,r li I,NU► 011N w4-- , '4 HUI N Ul r(1 U "[ 1J :.: h, 0>-.:4 1 ,-I C7 v) il. N 1 14 n, 1) r., u' a) 3 N H 14 M - .r) (11 ...,.I I ,)) n7 'LS N .r: W 44 a) N > 1 i Qi N ) : N N n) o .li C� >, tP rd o H a1 t, ) nJ •r 1 c: 1) ,) o U a) .O H a) 01 �, • V , 't f 'Cl (1) 1 r •.-I n) 4 •CI HN C71 A. N • U 0 :'. ft 11 UI U) N ,� 1rII c; •,1 nl U, r- 3 !•1 to n; r -I U C ) • X U -c; 4J U N • r1 b1 a) al •r) 0:101:---HI 1 t~ 1-1 G (3) 0 U) IU '(1 • N 11 4 1 0 ) U 1-)•,-1 0,1i (I) O WO 0 O (1)), •• 1 N '.-I X.C: •r1 !~' :J U • cOu 11 0 o4r N '-1 v :3 31)rel o 0 A 4,,rnios c.L g C -L C r) i( C 4 C chi/ v/ y 640/9113 Of SuPER LAWS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family andI are beach a_ ch pat_ �or.s Any plan which would gut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. O tr Q rt s f; m I' N rA 0 d ti n W n G G :r 1-• :r . 1' at I- 11 ID O O rn O ( m II'r1 I-•• fr O tt 11, 1t N I), N N O (O 5 N (D I-' UI :.l' I-' 11 ID < ClID 11 • • Di Imo• ID ID i() I,• (u 11 n1x G rt•rn fD a :' r- 0 u1 N (1) I �G'< to (t In G W U) H I- • I - IS rt N m p, C I f to n U '11 ro rt. H n 0 t .� to N 1 i ID n• l 1, I I, ti •(L ro N P" g. ID n 0 r' , t :1 I' n) I'• 11 ro ► O W ,A `C G rt O it; m to ;1 to ID 11 < N Am M m G :r _Inc, o ] DI ID 1- 1.,.:. IU Imo. 0 1 n1 E ID 1 l U 11 I 1n 1.1 (n to 'l7 ;1 C), 1 • rn ,c n' n 1 N IU I]. rt 0 N ID E CI I o (D rt I... (1 n1 U1 Di ID I- F" (' m In n :J ID '1 1,. U) :1 • H (n : w 'iJ U) '< ID U n !1:.-.11 In il, rt. , f1 r O 1r'( U~) rt c� ri ID In rt U ID p, 1/ y '< O 0 t -t ro rt O • tD 1 to r: J• ID r1 r R' !n 1 I I, n m :t r CL a •n f) r t, O N• rt Cu 0 r- N I ID U rtvi I rt 41 :7' () 1 < D) rt < ro J 1 r1 ID rl () I-• F-,. Imo. (D n to c) co O n _ I.. (ft 1.,. rt ID ti. ID :J' 0 :J' U' 1''' ID r1 to."-/F'S. '0 It)• r1 ID •1 tt •1, .. p ro ID ID •'l '1 ID ID (" '(1 :i 1 1-' . to rt 1... 0 ,V (1 11' ,1] IV G ....3.11, rt ,V • :ln ., (D r----- 1---• I-' ID N IU O (3' i_,., (1 1 ,. 1 ., (1 1.' to C - C1 ,r n r1 1 ID Cl Il) IL 0 (1 0 :l' 11) [� ID O,,I) 11 '11 (1 (n (no, M ,1 ri 'n, _i �It (1' () rt O O to I' pi N 't (...:DI 1I .1 ;1, IU O Nit I ,I 11• j,1 'l to :• D II .< ''• (I it) 'C1 .1 ^I ,u ' f 1 ID ID Cu < ID it 1). 11) 1t1' n'` ID rt ,, IU tI ' r 0. n . O 0 (I1 :-1 to 1 1 • r� tn rh't Il,,� I] U rt rt .r I --r r I 1) O '11 O n' J v to 1' : r I : :1 GtD:3rr, :,.....:1),ID 1 ' :7 rl .-• In t"rt :J" $• :II tr '0' I I' I,. n, .t'� m 1'tr�,��ir):,.. i r, In 11)' U (•) 1 \,.3i n ▪ t'1' (D G ID () ID I t SLI at o kfl CIIl ID i:1r'LOIID t, (D O (n to (11 1.. C). In r '• • J 1-' I (,r,1J - ID n D1in O 't ?.---I (D ID r t 1 ' ID n ' < 1'h ID 1-i• 11 , <; U' Il, lirlr D U O W rt <, In r:GO ID n1 •J' 1.'• (1:7G :3 rt n1 n nr 1:trt1rt tt ID r t (U 11:1 r tL'< J ATI •Y (Y2CsL EC- Co-, `r)(!, c1ouNr y efoJq Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a Y7G I'1Cn :. CF. Los Hyl /'.G JG - - v ' -_ , - C ln writing to you in order to express my concern respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it michz impact Los Angeles oe_es Coi tv Ocean Quark services. ?:y ' ly _ �_ beam patrons. 1 i=cruar se_ . _ces and _herebv jeopardize extreme disappointment. olan which would cut safety would be an Given that county -wide bu' _ reduction is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorsethe p_ ..:..,wed merger o= a Lifeguard Service - �.'1 uar S rL' with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. -1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. k�umah Lu ef f elf' St fistSas4v� +kr-rvIo-sa... &a_ ct., , 4 a2S4 [31d') 459 - 1104 ATI r P_Arrreso g %. Co -t 1 I C/1 (lou Ty &9D Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration c00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los County, I alit writing to you in order to express lily concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. Mv=a...-_v and T a= e bea h :gat_ _ns. Anv clan which wouldcut lifeguard services and thereby jo":.a=.r_=e beach sa-v would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget -eduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed `me_ ger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. //(#(1,/cY g(i/e ////aP }ifywea) 49, /7i -La/ A11(4'. r-.,-Y'mcsa E �&_ C o -,.Lo i I CA (0 caw &ARD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration F.00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a res -dent _f Losam _ writing .n -_✓ - to., you in order to county express my concern with respect to the current- fiscal crisis as it michz _.pact loss Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My fa...___ - -- recon oa`._ -.^.s. Any _- ...._=n would out lifeguard s2_ :'ices an.._ beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide - reduction ,-. ..,- _..e bL�ge_ ='_ llC__: i; is - wholehear_eC '_J endorse` the proposed merger of the _.__eguardServ_ce with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmlyrbelieve that -Baa this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, C!: race to 1au, ao�� ATI •Y'rrc5cl Cot -10_ I j C `DalyI `/ $019, 0f pEELIGSCA Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a reside.^.t of Los An ..s County, : writing you in order toexpress h r_ �c- �� 5 my concern with _.^. _ Spe � to the current "a C oL'::'7 fiscal crisis as ..t micht impact Los --teles County OceanLifeguard services. My f....._- _ are beach :'C..rcns._ _ _an which would out . lifeguard services and thereby ^beach safety e- would r an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction s necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. . _ firmly y believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, WO LlsH,., CA 1.-16€-0/1-0,"4 &4L � / ••I Ii U :) nl O N L) G ) N I) •�I .I: N N O r. � i (I) ;' .IJ r UI O O 1i 0 A >. E, .-1 a) rN >,U,U) I,t) N a) > E{ U O J' • J 1 t0 U1 p, E= 1 1 : I') U) •t) •.1 w Ill al ), rI N °) �1( C f, ,u (1 al •n r, 1, 'u U •1ii(I) , r: U' �I Ertl U U N >i •-+ O 1-I U �� (1) 4 J•, 3 A Ir I l; 4'in )a N >� 1: rU I 1 0 Ul U J :3 •C; J� it) U) �I ,� U C) !r 1--I I) O Va 4- I Ul C� U U 1 al '' .1 N ▪ U >, >, U ri UI > N N r 1 N N a) ., 1' O n� E 1, , >, v.J >, gip' ' v) ' lr ,, I� rU 0 (.) ) r ' 1 ru II) is ry lr �� —, 1 r ▪ it) al �i ,1' 11..41, .0 O N IJ Q) ! I (a) a. (P U .c: 0. 1, U •C. N n) (1 .q O •.Ia) J) UI 0 U O rn U u)• �,) rl).r, i Hula)?�: J 4J n) > ,-� () .t' ) r I J ''' 1 U N U )' J� O rt1 J) �I 0 U U' its t) I� N U In 4i > O • 4) N 1, 0 ,U U) O Li UI N 1J CJ • rl Jj 4a • JJ J 1 t 1 U) I) U rl + U) a) (/) al C UI C N N UI Ul n1 () •�I 1� a tr, 0 7 1 C7 • C1 al n1 , O J -J Ti 0 o _, U) UU) C), II) • I, i J E). , i '- I al 3 N a) W N vl > 1 i pj ul I i to N N O J, ro oF+ N 1J , it) I r. 1I�� o U a) -,j H N rtl j)• 4 + 't I t1 N 1, �+ rt7 4- J U r I N i1, O () U) ), ru N (n V r I r 1 In UI J) al �, 1-4 ca id N •1 Ul , •• I ,d U rl r'F', Rl a) ( V) s,; r1 O 7 f : U r01 JJ U > 1 N U , ID in al 1, r+ I ; Ul r -I N N I • al O UI N tt ul )1 4 , 1 1 U 1i -I Q, 1-, a) R' O �O O O al 1J••1 N I [: I r; '7 U L xmu 1a Q o4,ul ►at s4)(7Ao • oresa gc,&_ eck-Lr)c, I C4 eouwry eoRD D sapERVASORS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration c40 West Temple -Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a T2ciaont Lcs :r.^�' Co`: - writing _ County, - am wr___ng to you in order to express my CCnCer. I v'_t:: r esPect to the current CCLnty fiscal crisis as it might impact Los ,.ngeles Count./ Ocean Lifeguard services. My f - and I are b=_a h patrons. . Any Flan ..cu_ 1 =...'-uar : services and thereby jeopardize beach safetyextreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget .eduction is necessary wholeheartedly endorse the proposed -me: ger of the Lifeguard cService with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, CAL Cnie_ cn. Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jecpardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, / 5 All ArolGSu ;c% Cr11I ./1 (O6Wr &19 p 6W154-2- W Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, ' am writing to you Omerto e:•:^.Jr ?s5 -.1V concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los . '_es County Ocean Lifeguard services. My fani_v and I are beaon ba__ _ns. -. n.v __nwnioni.___... ___ i i crud. uservic=.s and servicethereby _ bacon safety would extreme disappointment. be Given that county-widebuc et _eductr. _c__e _ nce=_sar wholeheartedly endorse theproposedmerger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, �U (4-S �t� Q L CoQ -(13 • ACTI 1-1-vemosa 13c4k. Co -ane; I 14 COUNT & RO OF ‘50i uks-S tion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration al500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 40,041 a 041' 11-vrmosa g CA C' every &4Azt) suPEE045616 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles Ccunzy, I a... writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los An --1 ^ount_ Ocean Lifeguard services. ?•'y f ar i nd _ re each r., _ Any plan y a , a_ o patrons. -. .hi=%: wc,_ld _uc 1i=eguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safes" would extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the ._ifecua=d Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. .1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ATI NR,-(rroS(L g 4._ Cc-,L')c. I ' C/l COUNT y 6o4RD Of L5UPEieig5c4 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Ante___ County, = a... .._:t::,g t., you in order to express :1v concern with respect tJ the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My 'a V an, i are '.]each oa.._ ..n5. . n _an - would v 1i,= uard sery:ces and thereby jeopardize -. .,fety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide buy- _ ecuct_cr. i necessary,1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed .;ger ger of the L_ _cuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 19A"ley g 7 ,ire, ✓, !3. ?° II- y 014 I-1-vrmosa BaL Cones I CSI e0UNT y 60/9RD Of SIPERIASCIA6 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 'Qov\ ATI c -%L eck_Lr)c, I 14 (IOUts TSI 6014RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, _ ain writing to you - n order to express my concernwith to the current county fiscal crisis as _ _ T:' cht impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. :.y ` 'lyan.:: 7 Gr= t==on ✓a..rc.'s. Anv =Lan ....___. wcu_.. .. .: .. l 1 �arllGr - s__ .ices and her=bv _ez _ ^e ' G-^ :..- y would be an ex..reme disappointment. Give.^, that county -wide budget reductionis necessary, ' wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger c. the T.a^LarG Service with the Los Angeles County FireDepartment. l firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /// /V0,7D 3/ 7 2' - rte' , �u� &eh an- &2,f,u,ce, ATI Co-uknet I CA! ('0uN1"y 1304RD D Lk/PER U/566 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f 869 Hall of Administration 5,00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Rieefir(4 6:6-z64itiJ !'moo enc y, go.oviv ATI r� YfY!GSc.L E5c-& CCA (CWVT y &/? SupERIASCRS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration x.00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. ?:v farm and _ are be3.... cat_ _ns. Anv cl=n wh:cn u' yo_ 1 i _eguard services and thereby jeo ard_zre beachsafety would extreme exreme disappointment . Given that county -wide budget necessary, t reduction iS I wholeheartedly endorse the` proposed merger o= the L i=ecuardService with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of cur ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, M114• k,rr,iosc gc& CO1&nc; I 14 eota y boaRD SaPEEvics(16 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 400 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: �rL As a ?!*+i of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, (Io peed ?..)13e._. Pift4-e bet., v(\\ c A'mosa gc-.. CatAtici ( CSI ebli �`'l�/ :94‘&acsciles� Kon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration i00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 9 Y2- /lA.•dw le Aet' A O• II Rvemosa Pc& C64Ane; I CSI (burn.'" MIRD OF S/PERVIc546 Kon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: re gelds -County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My-iazn±I-,and I are b-aCh-pa`rens. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Dia9)%iu ff5-1-(4A-PrC 301- PT1 o :.JH f ,1lo L opo, w - P, , 4Ric [ 3+31 r. :.rt 0 I' rl 1� ll :, N f~ nJ CI O ;J 0 0) O O th •(l .0 �,nl1 .4 (t 4 O (.1"I (' :U UP )I r: 't "@.. 11 E... b-1 !y' in•.I I 1 I U U .1 . UI 1 •0 41 :i '3 .i: J) ,il U) 1) l" IU n ci.'ii I-) 1-) C) >r lnll a r. ' . I) a) „1; .p >, a rl al I, v W r, LI n. to 1 a t: (.1 ,(1 o al r,• ! (J l 1 () U ` a I' 0, al 1) ( 1 IU al .•I r( 11 11..r.1 v al :; u r (•4 ifs (U (1 n, _ r-1 . t' 1 11, as W 0 •• 1' a) f( .t C O 1' ON U a U 1 •O a) Oc:l� J "� 'o "� la O .1. i, is > �I (U > . 0 01 4) .r1 0 U U' ,Li '3 0 4, .I O 4� W }g14-1 Ut O O >, 1: ,• 1 Ira• 11 CJ • -1 w G 11 1' '' •r f a p ul •r1 A: 1' r1 f: a► p J •r1 r-1 al al U) N O ••1 • bp al U oel •., al al 0 ir C>A . CO r-1 . .11 oll nI]. W W W a > )I Qi a 1 a -0 al OEIH W b O 11 • VII":'rf'Us 0 tri an .c., nt W : U) A: r1 0 .-. i r E '.f'.'•� �, N; 01.1ai 1 r, Ol 0 a N 'rt a it 41 41 O.lD 0,0 W 11 •••I (0 �I iv xcoll` a D OW a r1 W I -I al 1.1 a) J) 1., U (U J) F :J •.-I .4 N W 0 - >-1(1) 0 F UI >, I1 •rI 0) '1+ f,a)(1)$,t,o ,a cn > •-4 t1. . an al a-1 , a 'U rWi a1 .; r.c UI 01 11N r-1 a)1 W (I Wo.0.-1IJNu 1 U' .•1 -n1 al >3.r1 0 41•-1:s4,•r1,apt u1 .. I O. O u ,..111 p •rl .0 a) a1 4-4 U 4-1 [: 4 .,.I a0 O c) I) I-1 �; 1„), 1-, 4,, ".( O,1►y1nU1 'nt,croJ�a) a► W ::: •_1 it, o1 1~ • •r1 >4 9�, >, t, 1� 1) rt1 r1 11 -NzNr-1a 14 1, )4 Cn Z1 Q) alU ,0a) A J, U b• N F a r -I ,0 o n) b W U) n,tl '0.0 0 0 .r1 C Ji UI 411 'h A. ti. (11 '-I ro to W .r1 >.,A F :! 4..)a) �•rl a '' W 1 X: F a W >A >,1J0MU11 J, 0 a) ..- v 4-1 1::I)U 4-1 > W 'G o 11 U) a) 14 b o ,0 a) >1 U) a 0 01 v,0,N�•t'I 11 rI W (i ai� �0.4)g>.tn r. 0 ,4 o 0 W W l( •r1 N 4- + a► W .--1 at La .1J U et0�' •�((U rl .r: a .--1 (1) «f U 0 •r-1 A. 11 W -r1 .q 0 :i U 3 64-1'C1A 0 A 0 Iltirmosa- Bak_ C nes I,r 14 eolavry 604RD Of Sjf EV/ 5 -S lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, LeAf‘d‘ 413‘-te, \ (ZS �dV^ONci'Y� )�\\40v'oli 60706 503 "\ �? � 7 AT01 . livrrrosa Ba. Co-�n e r ( 14 ee0u/ iY �Ofi of 600ERukse-S lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 41500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 'Akt 0‘)-�/2633 rx i II-eX'111O5a Bak_ CPkAnc� ( L4 eowv-i 61149R0 OF St/PEE/A-546 Kon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: • As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 3 s .g S7 frG f6 itkirrYlC5ca- e)C-L CO-t-Lrle £711 eOUNTY Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 0' SSP 869 Hall of Administration c40 West Temple. Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los An s County, writing t _ _ am wr' .ng o you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as _tgh ' - Angeles _ � impact � acs ..:,�� es Ccu:+ty Ocean Lifeguard services. My 'am4l': and I are beach patrons. Any plan w _:n would _::t 1i=ecua--.! sery:ces and thereby je:pa=._:e beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge_ reduction _5 necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, t-11412NaftNe,1/4,‘,M(NCAltakiz R)0‘ agevive., GA q oz -i1 `1 ATI SCEPUgh Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 0f 869 Hall of Administration 540 West Temple -Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los =.n - s County, I as. writing ` you in order to express .:w concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it mit t '_=pact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MY=c-___% a^.,4 _ are beach oct_:ns. Any :-.7an would beachut services and thereby jeopardize beacsafety would d be -an V extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eli=minate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalis;, of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, AXPI 4i"i c. 144- k_ Z607 f srLAM4 boa IIIclok a4,41.4om goy>s) r >,'n 11 r. 1-I a1 I.) al V 1 La .1 I) 1! :f N U N ,.1 G 0 N 1) •.-I A N O • O ti, 'I1 .0 >s LI .,..1'6:11 .- Fa; :IC:: ::::::411 ! j� g‘i O )) • i1 I) •-1 t0 a) rl i • ► 1 . J UI •U •r1 w N ' 0 0) 11 r1 0j"1 41 al r [: :3 C) IU U) rl U L I I, ii w a A .-I 1) 'vU V: 11 01 .•1 :", r. tii I - N °k • ••c :1 • 0 .I: 11 al >...-I O 01 ., I •••• 4! .r4 XI UI..1 L: 4a l .. N ~1 c: !U .1 rJ L! O UI •3 .r .1 al to "I •� 0 O • I (~ , 1 al 4a U 4.1 1U () 11 (1 (� I1 1-1 r, final La 4r Q I.1 C) i, 1Il I1 41 3 A. O 1 1 in 1-: A 0 O U 'U • . I) al ..1: " Q >i >, U rlI4 W al UI al a) a > N U) N 1: UI .f1 L1 :411 N N 4) N r/ () 11 .:1: I) 11 �U 11 r: r' I) r -I (na)CO U L! L�LT'NQ alI1,7. alV) I i) rl \) 101 :3 I1 r� n C) rtl 'C) G :ii • (1) N U� N 11 >1 n. �I )i N rl (: c: n, m o al if c.. w 1I1 0 O •. .l: u) .� a' 11 .,I Q, >,. i C14 al a) 1 r♦ U O 001 U 0 U 1 R :a 0 N' N • r-1 "i .'i •rl ) is l) 4 >, 1 O N U L3 4 > �1 b >1-1 0 b 4.1 •'-1 O 1 0 to IU .ti 11 �_' N 0 �' • - N O • J) 01 La4-1 041 0>1fI-1 ii) 41 01 N :1i'n G Ql Xi I ) •►I -I a� w • 11 1s Il tl .� °� -1 v1 O. 'd • G' r. G to I)JJ �'NNLa Uin vlut 'uil'� t�arib•O,N�b `r, N (), U1 L 1 L), 11- I µ a) 3 (d CD '-I 0 • .0 N al •rI .P..11 a) furl. 'C1 in ,c W O H 0N1 ! L 1 a) N 1: ul U 01 O G ?, tr It) •rl r 1.1 a 0 U 0) ,C: H 0) N o j( 4! 't 1 •U 0 L! •r4 N w tn V •rl H to o, 0� In 4 U 0 >, N 0 •- w v .- 444 L-1 •.•1 •rl N U .-1 ", N 01 ci In A: rl U .'r-. '..1' [: el L: 1 O '.1 E ='3 A' LI N •r1 to al a) •.-1 N ri • Ol 0 N N 'I1 U l l 4-I I 0 IJ ..-1 p, L-! 01 O.tO 0I0 01 L1 '• 1 W••I h X: •rI 4 0 0 U • A" 1-1-vrmosa C o4,0n c i Ijet CSI eouN y 134oRD �^ UiSc-S lion. Michael D. Antonovich T 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ATI -. Arm0s a g �L C o-LAn e.( I C 4 C'o uAir y 6019RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. S'ncerely, MO. Ik-m Pc -k. C on c, 1 C4 eD INT y &D4D si05045006 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: • As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Sincer SZ << v /7,2b E5/3/4,L,k gt.11 heic gee --t C, 9c2---7 f-i.li/6e/5 c/itf. jetc,c,. Lc a v aft ei" ie ! 4 /hc O ET CI ft s s m 1-' n n o 0-1-•• :: 1'• M 11 'ti 1'• rt n (t Ili 111 (11 t-' U • I : 1-4 1 ID II/ t'• ID m •q G n rt .r n 0 .;: 1�nat�-gym) mp1' 1'•►i rtln m p, '1 Ill Ill N• '1 ID tom,(1, ;in ID 0 0 r' rt :] 1... 111 10 L<rt o ID aC�ro�F�.r ,u U1. R" ). •< 11NO O'<;ro tl O 1 Q' (~D 21 o rt 1.. n N JF, O 10 ] CU b N "1< ID () n ! to il. h1 m N,1 U N" 81 r. m A. (000 F<'• m 0 N :.1 f (U ▪ rt ti 0 N r1 `< ft '1 (fD < m (n :3" 1 :J' I'. In 1'. rt rD v: ID v. ti (T `< . 1'• 11 ID 10 1-' U (1. 11) (11 11) gy U) rt m 1i 0 ID b I1 O O• 11 'O :1' rn t-•' (D pj ID O tr u..0 1'• rt ,' ulr a d1 n rt d ID (L ID N ID rt pC, G ID ,d 0. .0 • f; 1 11 1J t N O I 1 n1 () m to N• 11 ID 1 •] 1-, a fh n;• N fl ,1 tl' 1� •< ►.A'< ..:J 'IU ' 1 , .. '"' 1 ID mID I1 1 M (<D r t ( ID 1 n.n . O n IUD] r W rAh rt :J' I-1 (1 U I) '01'• C O 0 in I^ m O 'J' UI I,, "MO 11t41 p1 :I ID O 1-1. )...< ID t I '1 N1-. in J ,< 1.. n rt 1-' tr G (D 1) • N :7" m N n f• 0 m m I✓ 11 ID 0 !n ~'tri m 1' (1. In r. '• 1-' ID U1 1.. 0 .::-1 '0 I1.< U p, (1.; . 1 ,O1i ID I'• ID 11 1.-: tJ' 0. In O it ‹:. ID O m N 5 II. ' (1 G rt N n N I: 11 (t m rt ID I-1 J r l r 1.• o0°v•o N o p -s mcl rt n mHoa NbI1- a M0• �. • I'. t'.tn M rh i'• (•• O 1 U) rt li m ft wa ftO rfr <0 - r.1 I'.P. to On A110• Lrnosa Bak_ C64.01C ( 14 (101/My 1364RD 1451946 lion. Michael D. Antonovich Of 869 Hall of Administration 800 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 2701 Y`1¢f'Le.05 ��'� Cd• -4102.76 A � � 4.,m0.5a g c.L C ries (0UM- Y 604,0 Of sup Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, 1 a... writing to you in order to express my concern with respectcurrent ' LO the current COLnty fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles Count': Ocean Lifeguard services. Nv _`amity and 1 are ✓ea.c. patrons. Any plan, which wool... out 1i=_e_cuar4 SCr:1Ces and thereby jeopardize :== Ci Salt" would b_ _r+ extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget : 't reduction is r eces ry 1 wholeheartedly endorse theproposedmerger of the Lifeguard'Serv_ce with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I f i rmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, r° r )L -!r , : 4_",•//+- f' C•61 -(›L eL /364 g co v77 0(1 Rxrylc5a (7OUN'T y 6019 OSIPEEUASCA Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los 1.n7g=7= County, _writing to you _n order to express my concern with respect to the current ' county fiscal crisis as it might _.pact Los 1-1-=,== Ocean Lifeguard services. MY family and I are beach oazrons.Any -_.. ....cn is ;_ .. ..� lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduct-or is necessary,I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 1M (Z. k 1LS �,}- ALS -ZU vim-- AO' kver,ios& gc-k C own e (14 (CUNT t/ 0' �� SUPS � UicS01-S lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 44500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, TA -Ng -4-4- h u,,,-rEk 17 )7 y2 10t sr Ai, 8 . lax& co ATI kc,i.csc cL C !'t- L•) 14 (1OaNVT'/ 13619RD pSuPERviirAeS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration Gq0 West Temple. Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident order to express fiscal crisis as services. v.. Lif os 1...,^01=C my concern County, _ am writing to you in respect to the current county migt impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard .:v =c - and - are bea=.. pat_ :....S. An\' "v:':_..: would _. l i ."c -Lard services and thereby jeopa=d-.'.s b=.aon safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, i wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. rri c7 .3d1 I L� Sincerely, At-ekhrtat•- Aft14‘. [kir-mos& Bc-k Co-t-tne I 14 eOtiNTY 13494RD Of SIU/:SI 5 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 400 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, A k4,rrios3. Bak. Core I CSI 1 W"T y /3619RD lion. Michael D. Antonovich Of SuPf-E 869 Hall of Administration 41600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ACX Kirvk9se eaov* CecaiUi 40Z7n w X11 mos& gc-k Co,,&net I 11q oou,vey &»1 L5aRDpERvag lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ciJatkce-,_ &6* - • 6DO VD(Wfx.—lbr 111,6 cR ,q -D2(& LL Y - Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county iscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and _ are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and j thereby eopar'" safetybeach would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the merger of -h C' Li~� e~uGr4 Serviceice with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. _ firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ;lo\ Calle 117rra41u4 R77, [I-Rxmosa g& C offi n c I C4 eouN7 y &0,9, Of SCIPERvic5cte lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 400 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, l -,o 5 'Ti-'T,. A 0 kKmos gc-GL Co- &ne11 C4 OOWVTL 1( i RD SuPERvIc556 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, J&C fa K7/C01e cpin'Ibn iU KELLIP L ce 00 • 2-7=::'__? LL) or\ --r-1� 1 014 1--virmosa Bak.. C ncr I (4 FoulUT// i U lion. Michael D. Antonovich of 61 a6 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: • As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ?32 S. M�� loz Limos& Bak_ Cone; I £iI ('OMNIS/ &O19RD Of SapavAsoRS Kon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, W (LL' Ain . M J L-4 S Ky X361 NA -( A P4 Rd LA t-AA3R4) LA. 5063/ AO°. kveriiosct Bak_ Coi&nc.I CA (be/My &ORD e47 st/PERvicseiis lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 1 incerely, A lr' '1,21 " C'S p (4,,_9(.., _ 506 ab L C A- C 4 (0aN7 y otoRD of sepoEevicscies Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Anv plan which would cut 14 `e^uard services and thereby ecz,ar..._ze beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge- reductionisnecessary, wholeheartedly =ed 1 y endorse the, ? .;sera ` the i it _ p_ ,.a �� v_ Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. _ firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Q w rt (iE I610`( CLV rTS 6.Lc, c6 (4._ ATI nlQSo P c4 C o-tc n e i I C4 (10u Airy 130AIRD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Y� 869 Hall of Administration .500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county,,- fiscal ounty,,'fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, C( Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SOO West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 03DyQ Sr '�� Co, �0a4� Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 590 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 27;(14^^— (2--/1 414 rtk. LA- ?c)oz 77 d"._6 19Q� Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service - with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /(GL'L e, n Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, z 7 N40Cir Sz 'G0Root c, Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SO0 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 'r s�;� r ON1CA cA Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service - with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, iws 0,04Ao(pc. 6a4 9taj7R Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S')0 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service - with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Nrctoked4 Lchne. 1\caofia,0Acif\ Lk, "rl-oke I Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 0/93 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a -r of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: vi•rot f'• As a aimaiiiissuipme4 Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtai,j costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 413 /, l3e e c X 411 Ivo#1-5 4t4oA) FYI/ ils-41 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, �1a/'MA jot � gaq fac;t:c eoe.,te /4709Z qectotucicr �eac.�- �y r ge229 3k)- 318-0 ?60 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service - with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 7.St- . 1icun [tu Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 4o • is& 10)' Aig Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service. with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 2 Gly ,: �`� a C,f' - c- // sz 9553 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: t�rS n As a x.,t of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service - with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ' / ..20,-1-1.6"-k__, £/o7 Pct-/ 1 c/25 -e/Q22 a&Z5ac/i� Q %?)) ATI 44?-, �mo5 o R c% C o- n O( CA (1CW 77 &'9RD 0f Hon. Michael D. Antonovich PEE' 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any which would planch cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ij ' - 9�3�5 •-7-g3 ATI -��rmos g c -k C cam-- n e i Ile &1 (1DUN7'j 0)9RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 0f PEEU�'46 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. T firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 145L, Y" � C AO 5/ 3 /co g c -L C Oti c ('ouNT y 661,9RD suPERize Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 9,00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Anyl a n which would cut lfeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Wo1/4-)d -‘2-) cit(L&A-'1-•_J jle}E,1714_,,c, 04; e -4 -e -‘—ft --e--<-—, Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: (utU 0er,/��i3 As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 4-4,44.) ,j j(r 6,c16 0II A -,NL A17--0Lf 701- 7 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: , 93 As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, _-- _—s s3,0.1/4-_ -[�sv\_-�occ�ct�ec�-a1�oJ�'-}fie 1�s --c. - ► ice+cJardS oh_. oar ecrcANes•- _ he r -44 \ P _ arvsAczzk Tocco,nc4 CO' qLSo ) Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 6-11 �( Kow- S (o Cf , C 9/609 ,2. / Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, d&\4\)LU I C,t/l e< (G1 A1C U Ic L- Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, vT-Le `A �c.,cLoe c� ej, `y.. cZ7) Com, ,-� Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, A?To," SSS 1' 7i1� . CdO+ . 90,5' 1� s 13 141- g}1..4- -�- Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • ��Oe�r Ooc-( 6-zociw 72°01))4,00 Ek-=Icr—.44/ -R rnlo5a gaL CoA,(-ncr 110 CSI OOuiV'T y 0&,'i 'S1UkS -S lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 44500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. ti Sincerely, L. 1,e,„, toits 5./u);. c;-ti,c4 1(4.4 Aff14. kjrriios& gaL Coner Iio C4 ('OWV`Ty ttoRD of sipeRu,so-S lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, -2%ak7 � Y PO i n. M - itflitalv,Ketsb6)-- aA A��. 4,(YrcSci�, A L �^11RD gc L CO -Loci. i � � e CA ` /1 ouNT / W0f St/PERO-OS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration s40 West Temple_Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: N. As a resident o' == Ccunty, writing CZ LCS ._n^ _ aT. wr _:IC :.;� you 1:1 cr der t0 express .:.v ccncern I with respect re v =^' .. _::+ the current nt COLnt J fiscal crisis as it might _. pact los Arge1es Ccur.ty Ocean Lifeguard seryices. My 'r-m'ly and - are beach pas. Any planwhich would 1==ecuar.r ser"ices and thereby je e beach safety would be an extreme disacpcintnent. Given that coun ty-wide budget = :eduction is necessary, whcleheartedly endorse the prcpcsed�merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmlybelieve that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 217- .3/140e P4 ,Maag. frA . c64 A" II -vet -nos& pr -GL C6%,tnc; ( Chi eountiy &, i eD lion. Michael D. Antonovich OF SSP 869 Hall of Administration A600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /104& 42-17- 3(0 \i•NtA1-1A1, ofa,c4. 70-0 Au kxrnos& gc-k C6&nci I L4 OO iNT' 6919RD lion. Michael D. Antonovich Of sum 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, YtiliaLcZIL Do 01.cftQ � W 0Qs (and [I-vemosct gaL C 8,,,tn c i I je C4 C'o vi y 6oliRD Soef-Rvics lion. Michael D. Antonovich Of 869 Hall of Administration A600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 4 exp rUrZ LO 2 6. Lc -t 7 q( Ge, I • lI-ver7los& gc-k Co&nct (f. 4 O eiA'P/ &D � SD uksoRS lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, cYak.--,J,IgeAuL ad c Pi - PAi:u -4-w-f4;9i7erbvez- /tio-, Az .•-, ut6 , , • • . 19h0.4,v keif tiviriu‘ atuvo is • I 1 1 ' Clt z1 44-nte vk^' VVI(Ot , �. . i <„ .1r. A� L-m05 Pc.{L C6l,Lnc I :4 C' A'rY 4r %150e10250506 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration A600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Afol. kverrosa BaL Cat,trie I 14 C -Du/ v/ '/ &Dim Of Stipavisoi6 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration A600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely,/ AM Ift Agallammio.yr II • A 0 . kRiern°50- Bak_ Cine (ite CA t iNl y 0/9R Von. Michael D. Antonovich Of SI,�P� 869 Hall of Administration 4€00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, t Lt �Z1 i,4C a CT* Ciesvci pie C'. 6.(1- lion. Michael D. Antonovich 0f SuPuk 869 Hall of Administration X00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 4 - Sincerely, • P' Lrr,iosct Pc& L4 (OWVTy/ 0' SU & ie SkSQUI lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration A500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, "pcm\o PattordirL looq Ywu•metce wc. PeAcrAa vAal cqor1 gc-k Co ,oic; I C# C'OWVT y & RD 0f S..10 E04516 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration i4500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, a-4-46-tt 13 ,Cgk5 ervl, s�- qf ;: cies 5 tr.) lkv-mos Bak. Co&nci (so L4 OouN7y &01i lion. Michael D. Antonovich DfP 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Ar...0,4 '34 r9el e) AG " 44A 814 J' - 3• C4 9'0444 lece ip `.L 6e'" ! . ATI Lm05 Co -LA -net( CA ( CIA' yImAd) SuPERv Von. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, Sat- e 27)Lat- /01.3 ete,,A?(t jbloIxe OD-Vd7 • 1-1-Vrn1050- Hon. MichaelOf V K D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, //9e4 faAiei.44 'I,.'rmC5(1- gC4- C�.<<�� c4 Oounrr// 13641e013641e0 U /31$ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 910 West Temple.Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: -S. As a resident cf Los -_n ..= County, =''�' :i: writing i7C wr_ toyou in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My `am'lv and _ are beach patrons. Any plan whiat - ould o• -card services and. thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge= :educt_or, is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, oZSb t�ia, f��Lo 14R-•r'rr.Gsa P c k C c1 t o c I L 4 agiAIT Y &699RD Of SSP l Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration c$0 West Temple. Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a reside..'. cf LCs - . s County, _ a:* writing to you in order to express .:,y concern with respect .. _o the current cunt fiscal crisis as it might impact Los roles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My f� _ V c.n4 _ e beach t_ one . y Yom.. .. - :. ,. _ tip::_:': wcL'_ servjces and thereby jeopardize beach sa=e: extreme disappointment. - would be a.^. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedlyendorse the proposed merger r _ :.� Se Li �_► : C. the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, -b.616`4 70o ,4vi/777 tN *ci) Wz-i)oN00-4eck_c-1 a/9 7o.z 7ji A�" • Ik,er,io& gc.k. Cow ei I 14 OOuntry 64oRD lion. Michael D. Antonovichivearsigoe; or SSP 869 Hall of Administration 41500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • ( 731 AA.). ti f T . Ikxmos& BaL Cplanc; 1 C4 (Ol,i `T y 6919RD of shopaiseg lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich:r As i of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, AIT k'rncci g % Cc -L lc1 ( CSI eOClN7y 13019ED 0' SUPERIA546 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration =40 West Temple. Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los =_n^_ �= County, _ art; writing to you in order to express -v concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might _.pact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard seryices. M _ a - and _ art. beaon oatr :ns . Any plan wouLd cut 1 i =cr-Ilan : services a.'nd thereby je :par.._^. beach safety would extreme disappointment. be a.. Given that county -wide budge= reduction is necessary, I , _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed-mergerC- f the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 1.1 01 , ��zu' krr,ic5u. g c4L C4 C'oultT eMAW SUPER. vic546 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 0f 869 Hall of Administration N0 West Temple_ Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los . =_-writing :. +i7� County, _ am to you in order o express my concern +with respect to the current f`'s it ,.�� -_ nt county fiscal crisis _ pact Los Angeles Ocean Lifeguard services. MY -_ i and I are b=azh patrons. Any wouLc cut 'guard ser:':oes and thereby je: __par _... beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed` merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, 2021 tertiaelier Lb Rio t, e4 tioz7Z ✓ ; ,'(i I) 1' rl I) {1 :1 N g N U ;1 a N O O UP '(1 .0 >, 0 A) 1 41 :J ,1-1O ,� • I O U' nl ! 1 (" r: .3 'IQ. 1 i r (I (; 11 111 .. I ;-, lii ki;i ,/ 1 1 Ii 11 W ''I• N :3 .r: J, 111 In 11 ,, () O al 1-I .i U �• ,ii r.. 1,Ur1 , al 11 W w r1 r 1). ()wI (U I: U �.l Al .:1, C11 Q U II c) (U C 1!1 1 1 0, ((11 ,•• •i 'U al 1• •I 1 1 11,•x1 �) a) :3 U .(: >1 N ' N (1 Q •-I♦ 0 r. r: s), mlu p •. moi• II (� UI 11 _ U 0 4:n U r, rJ ••`. •rl ..-1►-0 0 0 4: l 0 > 1-1 N l • '- 0 N •.) •••I 0 I 0 UP IU T) IJ i C )-1 a) g 1-I " ( r. r. .J U,1 1W1 0 .,30 ) () , {; ► I N r ri CJ r: •-I .0 4-I G C • 41 r in I' Jdg 'C1 al Ul In :,...1,4 O • W N t+ AI nl ,•.0 U1 I ), ut ( l) r], 40. UI al or •r l AI N CO N 4a N U) .' 1 I N IA ): Ul U n) I 4 O E-4 a) (1) N 0 11 • 4 1 'U TJ U •-1 .-i U) U' 0o Ul 4) U Ul al >, N W to W i t11 ' U $1 aZ • O) 0 N dxooIt aNO —I 4) l a) -i a� . 1-I al I1 W 0 14 U N I 0 •-I .E N W 0 > .o 19 Ul >1 11 - -9 a1 41 U al W ;i 11 0 la u) Wrl P.r Ul 'U •.-I W UI U) a) 11 „IQ) ' 1 U N W rl .4 al :7 . .-1 1 N U r 0, r•1 N >-..rl in" al 4d • -I 3 404 •rl A Ul �?UI •rl1.1 ul •.-I.c v v 4•$14->"1:44 a U 4.1 • ~ .C. 1) $4 44 1141 -• 0 p'O ai4ia?�In NN al 11 III 1 j •r{ 1/) a) lot GN1�r♦�TJQI' :11-1 l 0 a alU Wg1-1 Ut]'Iu NrI4)0(2101 W r....:: i U) v.G 0.14 4) UU)) 'rl 0. r" � N d` W 14 •rI >., •.C1 C: • a) 4, ' I Ul .rl W 1 r. t: U1 W , 4 4.1 -1 () 0 0).v-1 N r. (1) u 4-1 '> U) ,� U l a 14 W e O Ul W {. 1 c),00)> u)p.(u r W c W L 3../ W (J\ 0 4a ••'I 9 fa w °4 dPA 1% r W N a 04j c W >rn r1a •O U WW •-->I (Du, jW r1U4114 011 r - U a •U•,4b g v -I .t U) r -I N U IJ •0-I Q• 1-(1,1 W 'I:•rl£ •V i U ;s %+)V.[1 0 All II -Ex -mos& Co&nci I L1q eotiNTY & »i eD Of Sief-EV4546 lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration A500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 1 Zu2 1\Im 01-kv yJ (? 9'0 Z.D ASN •Ik -moSat g Col,tnC, I 14 ci wW yaOfI � �iD -S uks0 lion. Michael D. Antonovich ,� 869 Hall of Administration 4600 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /60v /Tv/ ST M.A N Hh41914 "2t6Aiclr� CA 9x26.6 &/(.rn1kk Se -44A S4ertor-1-71- " KJ, )Quw!k tQecLda Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall cf Administration cO0 West Temple Street Lcs Angeles, California 90012 Dear Sumerviscr Antoncvich: 0f SJf'ezU/`` As a _ C ^Gr ... Loc 1. n_., a... o ou . ,-4.,--0........cern r: _ _.. 7=7,='-'77_s _. -_.= -- �_G.ca .�_ G c` =r_ _ _ .... _...qac= ...os In-.- GG .. Ocean Lifecuard services. My family an' : and `ne- _cv : - c_ ✓c__.. safety "r:......_: be an extreme d_sa oc_rtment. Given that ..o un` y- -: _de : u = _ _ edu: t _ :-. is necessary,- 4:hc_eheartedl endorsethe.,ierger cf th.= 7'=cuard Servce ? with the Les Angeles County V. Fire Department. ... _ - y1 � � be';=v.= that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication cf services and curtail costs cf the =resent bureaucracy while preserving the quality and pro'es_s_cna'sm of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /vVitl N^V 1 i -Ce, cb,.Geo( -tto k4cce IA & aeiAde. K 6 ipif-r7fixed SLA)i wilf.A.eir et.i4- V.- kA)GLS $ 454 Gvait)e-S 0,4 wtiA 4 dow K Cit.r., -t- S a Akd come, vi ricc -to .-itc LSel 'P 6' . ct4:0 IA" -k-k e._ L4. C014444_, za l 4 0.N12.4.41,_ -4- Lec -t r, i7 1 ► c' 1-1 n► 1.1 0) 1 p -1 4) 11 :1 N 0 N .0 G ;1 N II tU •rl (0 0)) O illk ` ;' J , O O C' 1 •t7 .n h •rl 0) > 1 0 N 1 i0 t0/)) > . Ci, \ (1 1) F� : 11 U)'t).01 V�rI F» 1 U1 1 ' O 01 11 •-4 a) '� If; N (U al C. l: .3 C1 ni 0) , . rl , (I 1 1 II) (l 0) 7 .la .-1 1) �� U (: 11 111 .1 :'. C: LP r•I (' N 44 xi 1 01 ;i, (. IV •r ( $1 0 VI $4 J :3 .�: J) n1 111 .r( 01 I1 1" Io 01 W U 4-1 O (0 J 1; [ 1 O O 1 1 1.1 �) �1 4) 0 4 4 (7 O r: U U • 01 U 'U 0 U) rl; .Q O ]. G Ill7r 1 11 111 0) t 1 Q, C]' •'. �( >14 �1 N, t7' U) •.1 r(101: 1 1) :.›..,, .1 01 al 1) N rl 10 ti I. CJ �j .' 1 . 1 ,U al 'I1 Q 1J U U' N �^ J v 01 .; 0 r 0, 1, 'o ;LI .c t1' N f 1 0) 0 ..I G Ji Ul li �.`. N.. r1: 11 1).�� 111 t11t].1 i 1ti Ol N U' }a)jO O) .� 1 t]l l 1 >1 rc: f. O 1" UI O 0) :: Ol 1, .1 U) •r1 N_ U O O� U Oc: I1 ql .[; , c: to ;>r) '. .rI '�1-1 O .L'1, I)• >o 1J ONU �� 1 N > O(t' N 1)I1O Ol.,-1N' O N 1J•rl O,1-1 1 t) ('0) U 41 7 UI ,C) $1 01 (: C C: 1: .j l0 11 0) 0 �) 0) >a 0 O >1 H I 1 R} 01 O 11 Ul 0) l+ Ci �J U) ►a O )� f : 1 O (] 01 >' U) a, N �`�� 1 �) CJ rl J� W 1►( t 1 111 11 U ,--t ( �--�(J J J• N (0 N C7 ni n nl 4) •C� 40 01 U, 0 4-1 �� '0 q 'U rl U 0 1 f]. i� 0 C; �, Q,' Q. UI W } 1 U1 1 l 1 0. 11 r l �' a) N 0 •rl 01 {L,rl "( 41 N C1 Lll 0) W 01 U) ;� 1 i 01 Ul I : U) VI 01 U y� >i (7' Q 3 ,c;Iti r-1 LI a) rtl i t• 4 1 •t 1 'U N l l N ,4_4 U O r-1 +) N R1 U UI l l :' IV UI 1� 11...1 rl RI U) t7' U) 1 O) >1 IV al rl 0) �• •rl N 0 r-7 }( n) •r) CP 0) 0) rl N �. tU O 0) h r1 •C; N .-i al n1 tT 0 U) N (i in l i '► I 0 U r0i •• 1 t1, 3-1 N O.(O Ai O a) 11 ..1 0) -1 iv r: ••rl C; '� :] 0 rT. t70 U a 0 U 4-1 U) r 1 0) 3 S b .R 0 4..fyrcsuE;c4,_CauLo(iet4eountry &r9RD 0A'4 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration F,40 West Temple. Street ' Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Les rn County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it is t impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MY family and _ are pea .. patrons. Any plan whi-n would out lifeguard services and thereby jeoparize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide e de budgt reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse theproposed-merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. . 5// -5o V/ Sincerely, 21.!„y„,,,„9" caw 4-74t(A- c/7 gtlxf�. 935 ATV' t-vrnicsa_ c4 Co -t ce)cn I CA (uNT y 1304RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration ..00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los ::n =_ v Cou t .l , - _ am writing _ __::g _ you in order to express my concern w_ _h respect 7.0 the current county fiscal crisis as it might _.pact Los Angeles County OceanLifeguard services. MY fa-__. and _ _re ✓e3.... :�a�_ _.._. ..:'_ - __.. _.,._ lifeguard services and thereby b==ch sa==ty extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger o the L'=^''ard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, S z 2 7 xi A/o P/A.� Rd goz-L/NG "CLS ey1?TE7 GA- 'l0z7L .7 /4'/ - ' l./(4 Aff _ r. _ n A i n.,,, try 13019RD 0f jC,,pEEV/ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: a residentswriting of Los -n. County, G^ `..0 you in order to express mV concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisisas it might _ act Los Angeles County OceanLifeguard services. . fa...__ and : are bea_.. oat_..ns. '_nv =Lan wn_c:- would cut thereby and h _ _by jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget red uction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorJe the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. ? 5� do vt �' - * G Lc! ri 4141-. r 01'w C•9",ti4441-14t Sincerely, oi.t 0- (6g" Utf/5--- 2=i6g5Pcol s, ri r--4-(r.GscL RC% Co -,co,( &1 (Nay -Ty &l Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a ''—C.P.Slt cr i.LCs _n^c'�e -u-zV = am writing _' ng you in order to express my concern 'v:__h respect to the current county fiscal crisis as i.. michz _.pact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MV _a y and 1 are beach ✓at_ ^ns . Anv clan which would li--cQ�uar,'services and thereby a ---cbeach Sae-_ would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, c ,+ c 4 AJ ., fes. ( ac w , �-1�( l c:4.7 ,f 6.11.-v.- , i4 lc ic be_ „-1-,...- 4 ,; •v •#/&J .4--- -14--- C.-444— 61, 4 1- i --) 4.n., C—A.... Li .-.. 0 C....",- fl.).:t C - l.4^• 3-0----- j.r,-- 1 / - 7 I ATI �mcscz Ec- Co-t-zr,C.I Ci (buN7y 13o1q1O Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Ln^s County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might _.pact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. !•y f an, _ ars beat.^.r,atronc. ='a •...- :L'_ lieeguarc services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be a^. extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, atit ZbIb IV- PL Qaavda RECO • tit q¶Z'1 e 01‘. g c JJ ie 1 n +K 10i 6UPEE11-5612 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MY and 7 are beach patron. Any _a.1 whi=t would cut 1i_ecuard services and thereby je :Dar._: e beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the propose: merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmlybelieve that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Mvuk 1 ' \(es -,Ds a 3 GCa2s� rmo5�zE5c4_ Co-t-ctiel( (70antry 11,19ifiaseL/44.5606 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and _ are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, �. C4 ATI kYc5 CL Co -,Loci( ie£4 C70404 1 -y MgAW Sfil5A? Lag Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration ¶0 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, = am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My `artily and -' are b=.ach patrons. Any __ n ar=chwould out lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an would extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service 1A with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, PZiv A/40 ;7,L4-9WC) ecLit 9C-1 2? �ZS p P�N • r-� �r�^o5�z gc4_ (7DUIW7 6614RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los n County, T am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Les Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My r... -.y and T are beach - :T= Anvwh'ch would - li=eguard services and thereby je:pard_:e beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _ t reduc _on is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed` merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, L. l : c":43 D.25 5AmO L5T --t To.A0cr, cA- ?050 G ATI I -PJ (Y!GSa gc% CCk-cr)Ci ( Lii C chi/v! y &19RJ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, = am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it impact might "^ t Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard 1.. 1l services. fa- andI are beacho^u'_ 1.7y ..Vpatrons. Any _�.. �•:.___•. would _.._ li=ecuard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction 'S necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. _ firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ;- / 11'#q'k ti.. Coot 90-' 66 o .rrric5 u. Vi c% (canny &019RD o p EVJ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration O0 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Lcs County, = am writing to you in order to express .;,y concern with respect _ current the carr n t county fiscal cr'sis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean L _; eguar services. MY _- -- and _ are ileac^ patrons. Any plan wr._cn would cut i =cruet services and ther&sv D ;oa=d_:_ pea.... saety would be an extreme disappointment. Giver that county -wide budget _ e :uct_on is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger c= the L_= ecua_ d Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, MZ/6-0D,da) 452:1C1-1, vc Q'z77 ATI 1 Y'n''GscL gc4_ Co--(e)ci I £4 ('0UN7y &619 Of SUPEEL/''CA Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 8.69 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: Ke&ZUCX1T As a sr-.—TrdCrrt cf Los zn7= i =c County, a:' .. _ _::C to you _n order to express my concern with respect to tie C ._ reri count's fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles _ _aLifeguard services. r /149.071 My 'ami'v and 1 are beach patrons. Anv ,a.. ...._.. _...t l_egua_d services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be _.. extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction i_ ne.e_ssarv, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the _ife^�'ard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincer tkir'rroso- Fc -L ('ouNT y &19 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration G00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident County, = am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect orn the current county fiscal crisis as it micht impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My fan_-_ and - are beach oat_ons. Any -_n vii. lifeguard services and thereby e"'pardi:e pia_.. safety w - _ - _ :l+_ be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ATI r4-..frPcsa_ Ec-k. (7,ociAtry 13619R.D Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern w_h respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it m. ght impact los Anaeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MY familyand a_ .= beach ✓G.._ cns . Any plan which would c..... 1 i=,=ruard services and thereby Jeopard_: a beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget �Y= -eduction is necessary, wholeheartedlyendorse the proposed ger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /Wo /Z,I,y&t,o ec? A01. Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: 0f L5OPEEV/ As a resident cf Los 1.n7='== -,,Ir+-y, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county f'-scal crisis` as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. v=am4ly and - arc Oeach oat :r..s. An`. clan -cn would -i fecuard services and .hereOV jecard_: e beach safety wol_-d be an extreme disappointment. Given that county-widebudget reduction is necessa_ y wholeheartedly endorse the propose: !Merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. (%-cFF &)ME 1bhnt- ►s1-gpai S f gE 80ER I q,Av A- umE wcyteicri, Sincerely, 5)01/L:d4- zap-3 PERXY Aum A Rep eio 902-78 �; >.'f1 11 [: 1-) al 1.) al 4) 1-1 • 1 1) [+ 1 N 0 (11 4) c ‘44) N 1) 111 • - I j nJ :11, O J 1o () U`•tI .0�`1+•.-1W•U 4 'UNN>• .t I { r- 1 to a) ,-1 .-I,1 1:i 1:1 U) '0)01•,-1 QI U{ !n �, aitr ;i U l)) al r1 r. ) + 1 a) 'l .0 .--1 N 0 [) 11 111 ••. C: tP rl N j 1 U l'::):1:1 I) n) >1•,) 01 a) 1 U (�al 4 1 { 6 4� r A •. I 4 1 UI r i ) l 0 Ul r. 1) ul al 4• ' •0 a �{'Ill 0fi I ulo I I 1) () �• ill Ir 41 •'. o ▪ Q, 0 c: () O 0 • 0 'U 1 al .1' it 1+ • a) N .11 1 a1 (: O t1 11 rt N N 4▪ >f) N , Ir r: [ r 1 al ) r r {) r -i ri ilatu:)11:. O ru 0 t) 't1 nl o 1) U U' N c :au(.. -1.1141 1) a) • :) (n r I {� 1 ) r . •[1 O a) N Q) ,-1 to a) :; 1 'U .c V U (' (). 11 c ' in ui N «1 t) .t1 r t11 } 1 [�. Q) N a) �- o •. •r: }1 [; a) it :t� [). > A [ 1+ [; O >: U) ()'.i 11 a{ s al I,'•r-1 {n •-I Ql _1 - G U) a) 0 0 rn 0 t; ;> rJ •) i 1 0 .f: a) 1) > . 1) N 1a .c > aJ b > 1) n Q) •( N ;� ti O MI �i 0 U tt% N 'U 11 [- N U 4-+ Ul '0 c1aa)r • 4-1 .4 )I c:�� In �+a) o a�a)1a 0 �, N o1+ • a) ).4 4J U1 1-1 O aj !' E n r1 4I G [J '0 U) 0 0'U a' -)c._) N O. a K4to �+ a1:Li) r al r 1: a) v J • al rtl 11 L1 ql nt 11 rt1 i C) 1� Q) U, O 4-I ri 'LS �'p. IU >. • 0 • 1+ \lI :> . ;. Ca Q: ar 0 U) In [ )� U) -%-11 I 11 a. ) t r'1 `4' al 3 N 1 a) •ri l q) N 'C1 UI '.1 W 4.1 a) Ul ;> 11 a) U) 1: Ul N al O c >, IT r-1 al N}1 41 '4) 'U0) 11 • ••-I N W O • r-1 •N al a, O U 1I > rU Q) UI 1� + r1 U •r•1 r -I U) CD in I) 0) , IU a) �I al .c •.1 N U �I x 3 � , : .-I U Ci ().r: 1J 0 • 1+ N a) • { U` Q) rI N 1a a)0> a)) 1)1 r-),r;u),-1aln1 • rn 0 N N '11 U1 11 4.1 0 0 .,-I 0. 1-I N _7 o wO O O a) 1+ •-i a) •-I i< .r; •r -I >~ 7 :.3 U xcoU )-1 0 04-+ to .-I al :3 3 4JTSA 0 r-�rrres� gc-L Co-t--oci I CA (DUIVIy 6079RD Gr iC/PEELIG5616 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a . of Los An �= County, 1 am writ -ng to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Ance1es County Ocean Lifeguard services. .:v .a...- and 1 are beach patrons. Any _an w ion would cut lifeguard services and thereby jecc'ard_oe beach sa= v b: ou extreme d i sapoc intnent . Given that county -wide budget reductor, is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ieyvegf /S/iLer /40/'-e 7I -e5 ‘64&6624<_E Arm 4 -574 -es ak-f 5-76/ rtic 7(i/`-€), giro r ' rmcsa- Ic4 C -;NCIH C4 ('ouNTy &D 0f SuPEElli Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration F.00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a reside; of Lcs _;;.._ -ntv, - a:r. writing to you in order to express my concern with r espect to the currentcoL. �'^." V fiscal crisis aS _^^t _. ^act Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. MY facj-_ ._nd _ 7.-r-= _ ✓cam.... lifeguard services and . r=b" extreme disappointment. :gat_ Any zecon an whion would out safety would be an Given that county-wide _-w_d_ buy _eduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorsethe merger of the guard Service with the Los AngelesCounty Fire Department. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of cur ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /c://y0-e /41.4 /%/(1GG2e_yI l��'S — S-70/ 7V6/ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a rt of Los Angeles County, I am writingtoyou 9 in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. D SapEkvalAilS My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ,..-1c;:pk-ck.N I�i65 W42oorLo;LL Cra,•k. 931 �S AfT r-.-rrric5 gc-L. Cot.tne. I 4 (lOw t'l y 6019RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Of " ERNARS 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family andch pa- n I are beg ror.s y z; plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, P6Lif ZL ST. Aff r-�'rrrc"sem gc-t. Co .cr)e1 i £4 (OU/W7 604 suPEE05016 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and 1 are beach patrons. Any clan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget :eduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, g aL C oi. t r, c < 1 L4 C'o uNT 7 60/9RD 0 SUPER1)45a6 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, 1 am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. r My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan. which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide necessary, budget reduction is n c e e ' 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed` merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, GG Vx4 )7j /� ATI ! c% C CktrIC1 eiAtry MIRD 0 ' SJPEEVJ:sc Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 2)) ATI 4.Armosc.z gc% CGS-cr1e( `4 (1Cu/v/ y 60 9R' D Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and are b_ patrors Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge= reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, S7 (I 1 ,})7 krriiosci P c% Co-1-0r10.i ( 15 CA C-Oa/v/ `/ MIAW Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 1-rtArrY105 a g at_ C Ck--01 ()NIA" 4),19:45neRIA5.606 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. gesiyu AL-sy-vv\db) 10,4‹ • Sincerely, A" N• 44-rrcl P c% C of C t( 4 C Ou/ V/ 7 &,q Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Of 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would` ut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would bean extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, 6 or - 00)4 )Lice\rio) 9..9 0)4( ATI g c.4_ l'DUIv'I y ep0 t9RD Hon. Of S PER/% Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los'Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, L4) -4A iKtackL_, eidA4-01/y1440L LLd)CQk?4\ Mid. ftP Ari7'Gjcri.f'��l.L ci,7)-Lcr)Li I �j' C� C'ouivi y 60Jq Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Of SUPER/1542S 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any clan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the -present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, &azdI P0A0-41-1 4)1/41 emArtA-) eci,ILfitit), a 0 -)AK - ^'mos�z �% C ? i 1 CA ('ouN7ySupERvASCRS f9 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Of 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and _ are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, ? wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Z firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, -7)/ta94, guimi,(a“,e4/ 4.;.5) ATI -rmoso 1? c% Col -torn I CA (7souA ry etoi9ieD oSUPERIA546 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible .alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, dluuek c//3/Ar) �2 12 'ZZoZ (7 fZZ S8/7/ci 70/6z �K'mosi Pc% C'owVTy 6O/beD 0 S5,JPEEUls Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which ch would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, - l ss RkGc eG s e ��e C°A 170(6 ATI i-� rrncs g e -k. (DUI tiy epOilieD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 5,00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopar.._:e beach safety would be^an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, advtlAkiAmt„ DII1bi li°t444)/L4W14-°L et3tAi& Cr"- °IJLIOL . N' + All 141,Tn1c5L.Z. g&eL CO -L -01(n ( C4 eouNl y 13ollieD SIIPEEIAS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My -`amity and I are beach patrons. Anv c_ ar: which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Citkii.Afevo7m c1 � ss 3.1710 tve . ' (Ay ft toy (q `'11'' N A��• i --j rrios� gaL ec�,-.cnci ( 1 (101/WY 6019RD Of U46 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cutlifegua lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Li`ecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, e. ,612/7_ c ex 9 %/� c . d 540 ATI kir mos ct g c4L Co,toe,( C/1 ntr y &o iejtaEkasaeS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed` merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. L Sincerely,3 G ATI -Tr)loSaz gc4_ co-t.unci 1 CA (10u AtTy 609RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, cc/7/13 ‘C'\(\t-\\ Z o t ATI 60,904) Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. which and My� are beach patrons. Any plan would cut . family� lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, • (1/31 KttSfear, A -✓e fG ilviakom (jft'jtAC1 /LI 3 Ir-vrmosa Pc?L Co -unci( ie LSI eOciA7y $0/9 6/AIERWORS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich f 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /4114444/ #471,6 c25°lYs p- 2-93 All Arcsa.. ROA. C (10tiAtiy 13019RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 9,00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a a-c3i t of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any elan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sin relly, �27 y4‘4.10, 5-01a syt;let, ATIN1. r -P i'moScz gc-k ( 1 CA C'oaN7y 640AW Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Y 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, c_->ML/A', � i A01. ).1-o c„. s_t N(Yro5a. g%L ( CA ('DuNT y 13o19RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich F 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 1� . !I 1 iL C :' C% '-�-i'� c � i 4 (0uN7 / 1364RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Df 869 Hall of Administration 5.00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County, Ocean Lifeguard services. My far,.il v and are beach -_ors lifeguard pa..� Anv bar. which would cut services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 1-73 (1( tC i /)Z —2,tj(Cz-1-- ,6-c/ . At gc-k Co-%_knei (10clAtiy 00719,e0peEasoips Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons.a whichwould my plan cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, V3 S. C\Z--0-51" D2. e6A,eA„ qaJA(1 RD Pr-P.ry rrc_Sc L C Com- L o L( I e p L 4 C c i/ v/ `I 64017 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge= reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, alAi4 1 50 Lockk6k i4vi. Avg :3 tCrro5ct gc.L Co -t nct I £'l ('culV'ry 6coieD of stipEkviscieS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 5,00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any clan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, • • Oarr-4- 217 Cairfa 04/Ytk_ kee-dolvte at -a -0k CA qo21 F ATI i- v r)1csc1 Jc% Cc nc► ('C IN7y epolben Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 5,00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, /gq 9/0/0 i-Arrrios a_ 7/7.-/43.3 gck Come! I ('DUIVTy eio4/213 SapEEOSCRS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 5,00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan wh__h would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety_ would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 533 S. 64(4r+.Azs T-c,a.v-,fib faz.m-¢A 9b z� A 4/rem.sa gc-t Co-t.tnC. ► C4 ()cunt7y WAW Of LSYPER-1)45616 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 71tcttim LL4 dk A&L» si A). q_ct Atn_t_c_t vLk J a utcd tai-,�- - 7 — 93 4� � f: >,'(� I1 F 1-1 01 4.) 01 4) i1 1 l) 11 :1 N U (U.0 cl (' N (1 �-( .114>W1 : N N O U 01 ` > 1) N O C) CP '(1 .0 r' h •rl 0) 'i 1 >, u N . I S I N W I= 1, o 4 1 :� (1 ((1to > .,-I n, . 1114/ �) ,_ j (1 ' i ul •,(4.431 Ui ui N (.) 01 ::(1)14 -I i,;?. W LP 11 f C: ,3 U W r: rU rU 4) W a .0,-1',) U f fI UI 1 :, C. tP r1 - ,U \ 1 O (: 1) 0) >1-,1 0 W 1 1 U Q (4) U1 4, 1 f,+� '� A E1 N >4N •rl 7 l� 0 IA :3 .0-i) ni Ul .1 •[ W H 1) c" 1 C 01 Vi U 4-1 p \ :. O rt1 O (1 O I1 1-i �. IJ O I I 1.1 O " UI I) III y 0 Cl, O \ U► f' .(7 (1 U ' , l) 0) n1, • a I) 0) U G >1 )1 f' 1) tV VI W 0) t 1 (11 Ol p) , , , ro �N ( n. 0' ,, S, h� i:13: .,,>. 11, U)U) S IN I)ror-(ii0)rl,(: /II01f.v(i•I'l(1)0)C (1,(1((1 qlE: EI �� )a \., UI IU I) N O 1 O' O '(.) Q)' 01 7 0 Q) 1 i 1 (u �� t) 1) �� I U U' in i., -. :JD) 1) -rl .- I •, 1 `1 ( .O () (I) (U N .-1 (n (1 --..- .11-... IN r I f: f: n, (U (U 01 ! a (�. 0) IU CrW 0 .• 'I, S1 Es UI O 1�.-4 Sa .41 t; 0 (" W I .1Z S I , 1 �, A C U U Ol u 11) U 01 �i (1) 0 •, 1 ,n •r-1 W ,-{ •,-i •ri () ..) (11 .fi 1 1': ; U) 0) > .(: 0 ro 1) •r -I O I 0 CP ru 'I) O )) N n u 1-4-1 > U) c�) Nin al 0 0 () >, r ) ) (U U) ') E, L1 01 cJ �•r-(mow i., na� (1 u) ci a{ >, in n.ro d (n , -I a: G' 10 c:: 01 f f: pl (1) '� ri ' Ul U1 Ui rU O • I 7J 01 0, 0 ,� ,-( 1-1 A 'd -ll U 0•U til �� n1 "� O. :>410 •0 ai 1 H .r, N , .,., (N ru cI In .r. 0)w W (n > ) I v u) 1: u1 N o �� >+ rn O E 1 QIri a N , 'Il‘ I -4',T) O u 01 41'In/'U • N 11 •rl N 41 O H .N W a. O U Ul 11 rU pl UI 1441 11-r((r, U) �1(!) { 01>1 rU W•,-.."1 UI .,{ U rU ro Wto,:�; ( U.: :1 C:U.- a) 3 (U •r)L7' 01 0) (1 ( 4-1 W 1) > 01 41 4-1 .r-: (1) ,-) N rU - al 0 U1 ro (T Ul 11 1 1) 0 0 • T a, S-, 0) O �o O O W 1-1 •r I N I >: •rl r' y U xppu ra o OV -i Ul ( W : 3+)bA O -r'rrcSu. c% C ct � I �; &1 (0W T y 60/9RD jejPEEIASCAS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Anto:iovich: As a resident of Loc 7-..n ., - .-- _ _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect t., ..he current county fiscal crisis as it _,. ^ht impact LosAngeles Cour _ Lifeguard _ _ _ Ocean __ _uard services. Mv -_ - _ are beach _t_ _.^.s.�: cL'_.. ... 1==ecuarse_ ices and thercbv J e p,c= pea .. • •._ d .. an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction -_ necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the mercer of tale ^''a-dService with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I f r lv believe that this is the onlyfeasible alternative which will eliminate ,inate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 7257/4X- "-;;e• i�/X— . er ATI 11-4- Y n^c5c1- g �� C0r) c i I CA sociAtTy 6029 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration F00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los 1.n7=7== ^^un -y 1 am writ -ng to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county • current fiscal crisis as it m' cht impac.. Los '-.^,ce-es County Ocean Lifeguard services. my -G...il an 1 are beat.. -s. Ani -a.. ..._-._ v.,._.-.. out 1i ecuard services and thereby eooar__: -each =__- wou be 'an - :� Sam v: -... - extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Servic e with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Coe( _esc_c-E-cL�c.-. p( A DE1.. 12.L51/ ,gyp. 4°a -g3 A E c -k Cos ) cl. i ie CA (o uN-T/ eoltbeD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration .00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a residentof Loc County, am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current rent coun ty fiscal crisis as it micht _.pact _os ._.,^c nc ^^unty Ocean Lifeguard services. familyMy t 1 i feCua_ ...Ser ices and t::�-e:,�r ✓y y ^r � � :Lan -.-_ _ _. �: �L• _•� be an _ ___ beach safety wouldan extreme disappointment. Given that county_',.. _de bud - - =duct_o^ is nevessG wholeheartedly endorse` Gr^ the proposed merger of the L_fecua dService ...�v with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely (Y) s< CA- 9 bLi 0`-5 ATT RD r-“rr.Gsa- Cc-t-t.r)c!, I C7/1 (06/Atr / 079 suPEE11-5016 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident ^f Los : am writing you order toexpress my concern with resoe r to the ourrent e^.t count'! fiscal crisis as it might impact Los ... ce_es County Ocean lifeguard services. My _a..._v and _ a_ a bacon patrons. ... % _anwhionwou_o out 1 i = r-uar d se- .ices and .hereby :i c” bacon sa v: be extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed mercer of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. _ firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely L7)-,) L( Sc ATI r,-P_Ar ycsa Ec% C.0,010_, I L C'ouNT y 6619RD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los T.ngG= County, am writingyou in order to express my concern with respect to the current cont'! fiscal crisis as it might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard _ services. MY fani� ...:i �.. I an= bacon tat_ ons. Any _..... Y:.._...n r. oud out 14eJaservices anV urdLnG`�e/ b jeopardize .ar _.G beachsafety would b �an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction: is ne=e s '- •_ wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 'lam )i C 206 402 ,41,62, 42.4,44.C4. 4162,79 r. ;,,'n l i c: 1-1 0) 1) a) I) 1-i 1 1) 11 a N t) ra 4I r : >., U V +:] i O 1)C• U{ ,t :1(1O I ) i 1 1l N a� ) 0 i-' 1 N lU OUj > •.-1 R, (0 U) 4-1CQU'Ui•r.)al l 4-1 l • l II U U I' 1) Or NsQ ){) C, 1 al I:) , a ai () ti UI >i -t C4F %/;:3 UI 4 1.-1 f • A Ii1) O C ' () )+) 1) a) al ni a)1)U>, U 1 • n,0• {n r)a >4 '•- J) 0 . 1 a) I) • C' la r. O, 1Uj C: •, , .t i I)' U)11u1 .r $�,�ni Ill ill I.I: 1U 11 ill UI t 1U)U pq • U{(U;)Il1nOI,•►1QrL1ii1' C: �ay, U(ClUnNi .IC• 7:Ur:1$s0a, 4�0 iii i)Ll,l, iCf11' > I OU) I) IJ UI a{rU'rl ,UU) 4-i U r iaWN lia li •,1UC cn Cn 0 •/ JNIN N .4 .:(: �� al U 1 i it., w a�` rl 1-: 11 h , i o o' f >a)i .,i >1 U r r• . ca) . i al •I -1F ) .;O 1i q1'l c ., a) JJ •.-i U{ •.I 1 .1 N a> ,.aU O O) U N U t. 0 0 01 rU i3 1 1)>, IJ al U )a • JJ• > RI > ), J O0 J'a Qla O U >, E I i a)Ur: �aU 4-4 > N I-, Q) aSi'L NE1 U U U Q{ >,p R, U r 4) J't N 1 'rIC-___) •,1 4-1 (n •I 4: V. N •,I I: al r: O a c a •.-I r-1 arcl U) N N U •, I IJ Q) ell O 4_, 1-I 11 3-4 a ) �, N { ) I �' a • • N (I) U) Q 4 a N > )I )IN 1 )i n, a) O 4i • >, t: 1ti-1! 1-1 H •-• . .r{ •• I a ru 'U in .r. 4(:) '1U)1 'N C" 1) F1 O U atl O H a )-4 . { 'U •r l .L: r-.( a (Ti 11 a) 1 i •r1 (Ti 4-1 • tl ri N CP A, Ul ) () ui a:>, IU Q) 1 U) a N JJ lI .C1 -1(1)-) .r{ rl) Ui �-I !•1 N •�I [7� (11 al •'-1 'a • t•~ 1 i a U > a) )1 —I .r: Ul rI a) N ▪ C: (• -.1,01.n N 'U Ul )1 $I$) U 1 •r I Cl, 11 Ql O w O O (V 11•'I a ••I X .1: •.t C; U X CO U ►-a 0 0 4.1 N —I a. ' 4) 'Ll A 0 r. ;>,'C1 11 1: 1-I 0) I) 0) 1) 1.1 -I 1) fl :1 N U N 41 r a O 0 U ' >, U al 4N '0 fl I 0) -I l�a) aa 1(1:1j)) U�1 •r(r =l UaN1 , OF a!t ,I ' •-I 1 O 4 0) in ^ U, )UI nG C: :Ui O CN 0) Cal :(1):11 ' "I)G ji CUNr,rl O 1,) tll 4 i (3• I 11 1, U) >,•,I U)O 03 •,I 0UI ., 1 1 44 A 11 • 1 [1 0 . W 1, 1 , N . I �) 1 iUl c: 1) 11 O(, d O444 1) CI) 1" int o I)�n1 ; i ri •3cN O• U) V) p 4-1— .r N A , O 1-1 J1 'V1 O (; O O • U '0- ;>, 0 r) UI U 11 [ N 1 4) N al t 1 111 all r)�U)n, ,s,h ratil: >. +• ii :iOi7ul,(1)NN1)Nv(r) ! 1„'O 11l(l)U) } 11 r + IJ 1 UI � I1, O,'U qj UI q r 1 �! al v ,r. id N t)' N (1 0 •, I r )J U) C.. q U) 31 L. N N N �” p .. 'I• 1 f l 04 )1 '•0 0, A b' !a r r O >" u1 U .,I .0 a) 01 Ij •, + UI + J > 1J td > ) 7 O .f: !1 1) I, 11 N U %I ;J 0 N 4) .,1 0 U Lh r4(1'(3 IJ ) al 0 4-4> N J r i1 al !~ r 41 1 (: I: 11 U) 'U o aJa)!-1 0 O>,f Ir ,u u, �)ifV) 1)C' 4J U) !-i O iJ f ) () (1 QI >1 f1, N iJ I •r1 V 44 r 1J 1 '0 U) I) U . 1 r++� G (1) •r( d 1: Ill r I: 01 r C r d H al U) U) ft1 U •+ 1J a) U, O , , + 8 A b + O 0 .C+ 1) rtl ;! f)' • :>, ori1-4 , ,`I !�I U) +n U) • I 1 1 n. 1) r I a) n) S._]. r-1 F. - •rl a) 11, 1 •' 1 Ill tU 'U N J~ N 4- al UI > 11 Q a) p {J r :>i , to C:rU o H oH >t CV 111n +I . 44'0 IS nUuIUal !) 1] o u a) V\ 0 .-1 4-) N O N , !1QI r+N V - •r1 r1 U1 UI 1UI ( al N 0 . • {J 11 •.i UEN a ) r)r-1 U ,iy i+ N '+ �aG!r () .0 IJ 0 al •-1 N • 0) 0 til '1Cl IQ: • la 0) J > .-1 ,r, (.0 .--+ a) «) '41 0 IJ •rl 0. ) a)U 0.00 a) I t •'-I N ••'- I is .0 —1 f: :1 U 1,1 al _4,:). x co t) 4-7 A 0 9-+ U) r a) : 3 4) '0 A 0 t : -,'[1 1) $1 I-1 a) 1) a) .1) 1, 1 1) 11 :1 RI U N 1) c; i c: N I t Al N a) O to o U' 't1 .Cl ; ii C •�I at '11 >, U al I 11 a) Ill H 11 0 V 1 :i 'f 1 rU V{ > ) C), �. 1 O • I UI al t 4 ]) C ,.-1 :J u) '(J •tel a► to O nl 11 ra) a) al nl ;i U N lll �{ 0) I '_•, c C) r l0 ,q ( () �) (1) ., 1 -t s 4� 'l A + I y, UI ., 11 0 u1 34 a) >, t, ,U •rl �1 )1 U) r I rtl ° --I •c r 4-4 L1 U) °O ✓O O n()ro;_it1C(,"i)i 1 H 4-) --44 3 O. I I ''UI' 4 n ° " v U) 1 • .0 (l 0 • U 'U - ' 1) al �� al C , I) C) ) al •C1 () a) > N ( 1 al r11 !ail) 1 l h` ..-( r-1 U) 1 x.41 >, _A ((`X\�1 0:(:- :))1:1 Ul aft 117.:7; ul .I t : : 11 1' n{ nl 1) 10 .-1 • r V f) al :1(1. t;(: 11UI11I. 1) (U)al/•� ID IU ) ,, t), t),•tla, al;1: U V n1 ' r' Cl U al N a) , 1 U) N Cl' W (i O .,.1 C 4j Ul _ O al . 1 ill II ., ( t ' >, .0 C: l 1 U O tT U UI (j ) al al ii •• 1 in ", a) • � 11 01 r c '' c ; Inw 41 In » O -0 (1) 11 0 O:-,.‘.'121i r I N w j 11 VI U i) C: ]-i N 3-{ 0 1 1 t' I)ta 1 U° al >. !1. N �J U) rl A �. .,.1 t.t al C (rI Ql J I r{ al U) (11 rl1 O 1 IJ a) 0' 0 41 r{ C7 CI al rti •1 0 CJ Q b U 0 "' 1 I ), �� , ,.-A: 0 X 111 (7, Ut U) Ij Ill I 11 1) ,- I a) 3 N Lf., ,_.t H •rt al �.'., 1 •• I a) 411 'CI {n _G: W 4.1 al U) > it �Ii U) i i u) :411. a) U JJ C :>, til N O H Q) 11 t n) r l F) O U a) ,-{ a) at 11 'I 1 '(t N I1 •'-I a) V-1 V t N CJ) 0, ((1 1' ta U al :>, N w11 •) UI 1n al 11 •�l �,i •rl flU rt N a) !~ U) F(: —I U ( U .c; .0 U t x 3 4 3-1 (0 •-1U' al a) •-1 N >~ 1-4 al U > a) 1 { (.r, (n r-I a) N rn 0 Cl) N tJ u) 11 41 1) 0 Ii ••-1 0. 1-1 a) xoU 0 04-1 Ul rI nl 3 3 NNbA O i 4 Areresa Ec,k Ce-t.co`, I i4 (wi77 & 4,0 Hcn. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a residentof Los Ano' .=e •^^unity, am writing to VOL in o - der to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean fecuaro services. M=• family and _ are ✓=a. -n patrons. Any plan ...._.-n i. :L:_.. out _ecuard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, _ wholeheartedly endorse the pr000sed 770,1-orOf the Tifecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. i firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving -the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, c�� E n JL OJ C ; O Cr C]. rt s f; (D 1- totno d Nn 00 x n c: G :1 I� :J' X 1'• (U 1'• 11 (D O O InO / (D Ii 'CJ 1-• ft O (t fn 11 U1 ll, N N 0 '.D U N ID 1-• U1 :,1 I-' 11 ID C n (D Ii • N I •• IDID U) I-• N 11 b i; x t :r G) _1 G: :; n I I (n m N n r I-' 0 III N• :T IU I • (D 01 '•: ID (t Ul G rr] N N N• I.,• Ii rt «l m N c II (I) (? O '[3 (D rt N n I n N Imo • If IU (1, (1, i,11,, t 1 N (D H .T (D 0 O t -r (1 :] I ' I ''11 ID t- O U)(q '�: rt O IU N In In !D t1 C N (D M (D -�-� G f: p (). (t N iU 1 .. IU t... •• 5 H ( ' N .r, 1 'Cl 1 1 • , 3 In Ul 't7 >1 11 0 p, PI N ID 5 W 1-' 0 `n (D rt 1.•. O DI In In (U H t.,. r ID ' 1 Ul • ;J • N• [n ;D' �D 0, n f t to 11, ft : tit rt N• i (T °' r N to 1) () J J rt O ti N rt (� ;� ri I r Ip N 1 t J 'C n o ti ID rt o II UU1 C hi, n Ul J 3 ,... r rt (D ti i r - N 1-'• ID 0 N rt rt Cl. oI tp O N• rt D) O • rt,1 n N ft ,C I( ;J'n r, C W rtC - C (D UI J ..3- I 1. ID rt U O F t.,. F,. ID 0O O n (D ,-. UI , rt to c LI. I (D IA ? O p' J t7`� I'•I (D �U t ' .� �� 3 L1. Il1 (u U I 1 .14 H U.N (p 1 Ill I] J J N L �• (L 11 ,U :1 t, ID t----.. u-) .. (n I: ' (D N N n Ir `_' '(1 ( 1,• 1 , . ID ID rt rr.1 Ii1 1 Al ^7 'It (1/ (; ,1 C) 11 J (D Ut 1'' 01 N r1 ID 1 :1 'I' (U O 1-' N r t (. t 1 (l, In 1 triCI C: 1-' H. r► N ▪ ri a in ID (1 '< IDrt r_ '1, IU ft n, n . n O tr :� (n rt., U to ; • , .. U fu '�j.,� O U1 N ► ( J. () j '11 r. O )-t, n t -n (p 7 1 .1 (t • (D ]' Imo. Ul III rt J' s. ti 1' :t 'C ( D • • 31111, i(nO .1 n ' I, �,,. n j�,In CO II o'(I t )(; 1,• ,1• 1N t-• UO : :1. (D r ►-m•N(ID)tn1ft itn l 7 N ,n • 'J J(1111 (D IJ 11 (D ID N• D I" O, In ID ( I In • • N rt 0 dC (O I '[ I.. (n gt 1. r- In o '1 El (D ID It I • (D n'C r -t, IDI- rt '1 U• I), (0 0 0 It) C C O (D N :::1" t-' 11 N •- 11 (t ID rt (U I-1 :.1 ( I Ii.".. :.1 tv . tI L A� rfD,Jrrresa gc�. C -L' 0_, ( £4 (1Dul� I 60/9RD PEleU/ Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration F.00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los 1n7=,'.=c - am writina or.:.er to express my concern L: ., with respect tt.�e current =Dun -,i fiscal crisis` as it might impact Los Ancele S County Ocean lifeguard "-=ec L:ar services. zut li, equard`'' ser:ces and there.y card_..= De` ... _^ -'_ _- .. .. extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _ €duct _or _` r eces ar wholeheartedly endorse the proposed verger of the Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 1 firmly bel__ve - this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety cf our beaches. Sincere'_v, ii v4 Lt 6� Q rr (1 / n A K fj� �/� (� r-� �Y'r) os ci g aL. 1. o -von C i c 4 (-O U/ V / `/ {4i/liC 0 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich Or it/PERU/544S 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. i% Sincerely, Zt1�I }cirri 14it✓1 "1.4/94Aor8t4GJ's C,' R5. wt. need 1 fFt vA 4~-d5a r beaches Ar s' f-5/ na5 a/,' , },krill oS $ko►Cdh ,S A. p, p 01 a r b Gy ), 1 5 o fv CS t- a ie1-• kfc15 cs r. inert. and e,'4 lire. u ardS . ?/rte 45k 10 G?j ;Az 0Y rN W a + yLf x;111* . kw, 1�'G q1/1ardS _� ,r o54 -z C.0 -1-01(n► C/1 (7 ati " y 60, SCEP Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any _an which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. oG( %Ib(! 1 I) 1! :1 N C N t) is a) 0 C) U� :.:).(:(C:1).:::1 (1 .0 >. U 0) 1 4 1 'U O )1 •1 O , 1 11 r !1 O (\) 01 0 t ,) 11 al 1 111 I !! C: 1) ill Ul 1) [• 1 L) 1, C) [1, U G 1, r)«1 I 1 [: (1 I 11,1 U ,-a) al )O) Ol LI 11 [Ul ). . , I r. n) �OI: r: i to 3 I CLj al 1' 1 j l al 10 4). (Nn) O .C1 �.`. ,--1�� r' Ll, ri) to •. 11 r; '1I 1! ,r. O .c~ Ul a ,1 .(1 (1) 0 0 01U 0 r. 1) ql c: I •r1 I ) 1 J > 4-) N > !-i O .r: ) ! 0 N • -I 0 U 0' (II 'IJ 1J G i1 a) c 4-1 I r: r ) tJ Ul i! O 1J ri ) ( C-___..) .r1 JJ 41 IJ 1 't 1 in 111 g U) •rI Z r• Ul 1 Ili 01 [ J 1 H °1 UI ul n1 U •I • a) N la :' 1 a1 al t u Q b r1 U 0 11 I). �1, til in )l. Ui , I )! I). ,-) 01 .,.1.,:,I, I QI !U ' a) 4.1 N Ul > )1 al U) r. (i) Ul N O H a) 11 ..I III •'I II 1 'II 'I) rI a) N •CI H U) 0 �1 Ul 4 U 0) > .I a) U Z N a) (I) ,a, .-I U rilC lij 1-.1 0) U > 01 1) 11 1 1) m 0 U) N 'Ii U) 11 LL/ OCWO O 0 44 0) 1! •1 N -'-I X X° O U a 0 N •-i 0) 1-1 ..,;(n I .f rrU 01 1) 0) 1) L0 ! 1 c: U-) 0011 O '1 11 •r1 a) 4-1 iS! a) v -HF 01! 0 (r) 01 ,..1 . Ul 'CJ ••-1 01 u) a) 11 r-1 a) 'rl a) () rU U) J-:•[ al 1 .0 '-1 1) .r-:,u• U c: tl' .•I 0 N a) > ,.,) 0 (1) 41 •-I •y iv1 • 1 A IA., 1 1: !-i 1 l•' 1 •C: a) i-! UI 4.! .(r...1 4-! 0 r: c. U) 0 0 O 11 (---I U) 4 44 •• 1 11 4! y C) 0 O 0 • U 'U 'L 14 C 01 N _?, 0) (1) a) > (1) 1 i)' (• �� Hi >. 4 ! >. r -I 1! 1/ 1 •' J) !U 0) 1! rU if; '�1 IA a) 1 r r' IU $_i i1 r -I la iP'U C). al (U I-) a) al ) (-) ^7� c U 'r) a) Q )U !U i to r I 1) -o-4(1 O a) N 0) ) (1) 0. 11 'U .r O •.-I C JJ (WA ai 01 •. I >., .q C: 11 :�� IJ ' .11 I u) -1 a) >. 1) n) U 1! 4) l.) 0 0) .,-1 N I' N 0 4-1 > to ,U to i-4 ! ul w 1, rU () U •U a{ -1 N C1, C: W c N 0 AftCA GstiNry p pe,QU�SC� Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 'SSU 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, PAVL 5YN014/1EC , CF(71FIED UFP V4RD 3607 VI51'4 04' M ,pNimTTtA/ 6E'C 1! � cA ?0A66 PEOPLE ARE 6'O ►NG TO P/E a lot/tr3 A LiFE wOR j N ? 410/Door I / p0, 6O0 $1,000/000, jf Yov cAly ttvN5TL Y PVT -� VA L VE ON !T , 5044.7/4l/IG 15 vERY wrQNG W fr"F/ (OLLE cy-ive INT-C-LO&EA/CF , PtiPiF ti,i/L/ DIPi 14‘. AC1 4_4-0105u. Co I ult'I /ofi Of PEE UIQ' Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, : am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los _Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard feguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budoet reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. _ firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. -1- ,,3G(.j Pim Sincerely, n 5L)67 ci 02_0 (>ti 0,/v) ATI 42rnoosa 1S(4.. Co't.LoLi i C4 `&4/4/ y mole. of supEkvakes Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 5.00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, 1 am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge- reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger cf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, NwA iw SSGC ( d i Y.; `'.- X6;55 ,Jard_s 4.re,X551 -h—a i e 5 c1 n c1 ariLI curl l 11r"t c -all Pal--( 04) g4AQ, S3 -1C.±(1 +T701 ATI 4T-rncsa. c -L CSI (iounrly MPYAW Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My `a v and I are beach patrons. Any plan which ch would cut lifeguard services and thereby ieopar-'-=. beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. A� nemosc gCeI CA (DUlktry 46619RD 0 L5e,/pER1145016 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration ;00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge= reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 4,erylo..sa g c-k C Gam- co c i C4 (1 ai'7 y& 9h D Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any pian which Cum would t lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, gr-7?-sie s.v6 eve. bk, Gins r C A 8 9c -H, 4-,v0 wifFirr it 14. Qs r )44 vE 4 5A'r- 6 -c-R rre /moo y PA c4/ 6144 Mva', GA-R.Dtnv4, Ga. 9ozY7 77, Lx'rrios& Pc4 I CSI (0111tI y &019.en Of Silef-RVASCI'S lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 400 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 0.A..csA 97-2.2.D 503 .2c12. 510'1 .. ED Avl • r}R•Y -mcsa_ gc k CcL.01c. Iie CA C-Du/V / LI 60a pSuPER11-546 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration N0 West Temple.Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: /5101 As a cf Lcs kn,:cc County, _ am writing to you in order to -cress my concern with respect rent = ct to the cur county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los AngelesCounty Ocean Lifeguard services. • Mv cam"y and are aeaon patrons. Any plan wtict would 1 i ,' Tuar : services and thereby jeopardize beath safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, liP10464 ICS - 1020 ��An`,aDA� Vc&H2, M t J• Lnios& P c,k C o.t,& r 1CSI a'(1641- y »i � D Pv2uk5011S lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration .500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, I V207 V4nctiLtvcv' , Wet 2r* eIG 91(,4. rx " iteirmosa Bak_ Come( L4 e wv`I y $3011 0 � � Of SuPERIAs lion. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 41500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, tR (CNAR7 k tiit LLi P'cM S J R sq -T-14 Pi-LfirPio— L . 4.kLE1vJPr 441 . a6-1 L 2_ Otm,c,laii 6kc-J 60-0J2)1Akii-g/1-0- k_^ yy) 0 13c,11- Cry -t- h C ) Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, LUGAct Coolookie Tr\reci k 15,4a c- S v c � Avg -1, ►�a3 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: O's4K— As aeot of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and • •fessionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safet of sur beaches. Sincerely 6( re_e-61-4/ CP-Di/Fr Al T. b”.6‘ f -E you otto‘i- Pelfk" CtLec4,"J vow G�,R�� `� keeP •`,�„6-1/4"/AA)� ��.�s �;.�c./+�—►. 4 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: lfs- As a rc dent of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. leZifa/ZL-e My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service - with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. kc"- „J 4.i�� 6 2c 9- Nt tJr ow kj &o vd S`l.e,+rUtSc-=s tt,m05a3ea.c1h CovtinCi Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: S/Jg/cj3 As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ego 0s-7 LAN (r4f. . 3 �;,,� s Arnicsa gc& Co coon < C4 ('ouN7y & RD Of SuPEE111, Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, _ am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as _t might impact Los-:,celes Count; Ocean Lifeguard and services. ?'.y family and 1 are beach patrons_ Any clan which would cut cruGr se_ .ices and thereby Jec✓ar .__e :reach sa e would be a:7 extreme disappointment. Give.^, that countywide budget reduction is .n•ecessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse theproposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I f i rr�lyrbelieve that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 4.44erK_ e7q 14kpot- 41.Qd 94,7 o 2r4A-, gefixtp*, 4 7Yty Atte- , "mould Jukte Azt detc tt�I � A r}��, �'mos� F ��. C c�-�-� � � � � �i C �1 C'ouNT / �o Of Se/PEE/14542S Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a r s of Los Angeles County, I am writing t., you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as It might impact los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. ?iv : a..._v and _ are beach natronc.Any- a cu_a' cut 1 i=c-uar.., services and thereby ie"^,ar.�_:e beach safety would extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, VY l - —Z(7- . 0'1* r-p_rr1..Osa gc-& C -Lr)0_, C/1 ('ouNT y &N Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antcnovich_� As a/__ cf Los zin,-= An, -= County, I am writing to you in order to e: `=_ss :ay concern with respect current to the county fiscal crisisas it mioht impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My _`a....v an _ are beachbatronc. o'= . .:u_... cut 1 i _feCuar.r ser. ices and thereby jie Doan.._: e beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. _ Given that co u. ty-wide budget reduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposed e merger cf the Lifeguard Service c with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ATT -('mesa Pc% Co-, cr) i ie CA ('ouNry &� ieD Of LSYPEAabge"; Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: - .tor As '_ _ _. of Los :_. "^-y, : am writing to you in order to express my concert: wit.. r_ to the current county LntJ fiscal crisis asit miaht impact Los _ _e5 County Oc=an L __ _e^Larc services. MY fa...4 7v and _ are :te=a_.. atr-..s. =. -=. ....:_.. ___ __t 14=..guard services and thereby jeocard'o=,a_ safety extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary _ wholeheartedly endorse the , neo er of t1e _=--,•ard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative whichwill eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 2G Sticrbqw ause cM1pI7, Ery. gc% Ce r) 1I 4 C70wi77 WYAW Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los Angeles County, = am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and _ are beach cac_ cns. Any cl=n wn'cn would .. .. lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize eac bh ti safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget - _eduction is necessary, 1 wholeheartedly endorse the proposedmergercf the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, As.?„L4...t.... u.a LNCLfINN. A� 42rillosa g _ Cc t tr ci I 4 (be:wr &'t' Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardizewould beach safety wou_a be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of :he Lifecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 2 7-4-414:c/L--‘1 f4. ekitt r,1 /Li%} '%5 Ai. a'y., ',t )>ec C-�` / 1 L. 3.3s'? 6 Aftd. Armosct g %. Cc -.r)c( ( L4 (OuIV7y etoRiel3 0 ' SOPEE11-546 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, A1t4.4,rmosa gc4_ C Lr)ci, ip CA (1 /N7// &9L USS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich D SCEP 869 Hall of Administration X00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a r t of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. • Sincerely, Afv1 ' Air MC'S � Lit (lou/try 80A2D SuPERLAWS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: vi s; rcrL_ As a zie•ct-dont of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. family My y and I are beach patrons. Any ;..an which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budge- reduction �} uc_or, ;s necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, -i4Al 4-5, lc c, 1(4. L.-4 S `I- lc e 74' ATT Y'n^eSc Z tic -fit.. C e -Lc r) L i C/1 C ouN `I 66,q TAFEJ,45 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration c00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a cf Los An County writing - C:i. �n�� _ __hq t ,.. you in order to express my concern with respect to the current Angeles count y fiscal crisis asit might impact .^S �oL:�y Ocean Lifeguard services. MY mi„, and I are beach patrons. Any plah whioh would l -cr-Liar .- out se'' _ic es and thereby' e"oard_: e beach safe- would d be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse` the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Lcs Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, r j 3S /'c- 1/ '19ir> 5/WC-1I S// O/ 1/ /7 CG 2S C: >,'!1 1) t: 4-4 a) 4 1 a) J) 1-1 \4 . I 1) 11 :1 N U N J) C: i l" N (1 •: 1 .1" N 0) O :-1 t►1 ;� [ 1 N U O IP '(1 .0 �, h •'-JI'lla) '�, >1 U al . 1 h a) 41 E: Sr o 4 al E: :i 0 u W r{ 1 i til (i "^, a) U, .0 { c U g. I) 1) (1 E. 11 al >,•,1 0 0) 1{ ii 0 4 N �,1' ; ya N A 13 �, [.: «1 { (1 0 U1 J f; J 1 u{ N •,-I •C a1 (./ (' al y� 1 4-1 A :_1 1 '' 0 1 U) 0 0 N O O t 1' (, O{ 1) -1 S: 4j (-r ya 1)" �.«1 1) i,, y 0 A,o '{ N (: U 0 • U'v 1, c) a) al 1) al (1) > N U) ,v 47 !) 1, a: 1 . ( ) ,yr U , Ul .�1 !1 1� N N • 1 rU O 0) •': ii 1' 1) O u r 11 •,, N 1r }, 11 C c) ; ii, (P' 1 a a► a.1 13 al .1 i , 1 n) u� �, J1 U U' i� 1 V 101 • ;i 1) t],r_� .[] O a) n1 '0 a) (1 N (1' N U Q' 0,o . I ) JJ U1 rl r C: [], ro 0) �� 11 [,. N a1 p !. C; 0) 1, •.1 A, C al ir N:•, --- ,c o rn v u1 0 1 n a, al .4>_;:c-14 N '� a1 •rl •'-I .r{ 0 A 4J i1) ; { cA N a) > .c. ' > 1-1 N > r 7 O r: (, 1 >. 11 N U �4 Jj L 0 N 1U •rl 0 0 ()' N 'U Ji J./ 0 a) .�{ a) O aJ a) >a O () 1, k ) 1 N a) (, la �) G J1 N :1 O J� F J1 ri U O al >, ta N ro �� A••iJJ4) C^ 4J•rI !1 Ut 1 Ur{rl N t' 01 A al a1 J •rl r1 FJ. a) N N N 0 —1 J1 lll U, O y� r( C7 • v N 1a /`I 4 Al 0 N ul (] N 1 i 1 []. I i{ w (1) 3 N L ') H H . •r) 0 }, .r{ ••1 a) N '0 N .C: W 4-1 a) N > ) aj (1) 1: N N 0 J4_)A >, CP N0 H a) 11 1 n1 •.1 ( 101) . i O U (1) ! [� .—I a) ro ) i •4 1 '0 'U al h • -) N 4-1 L) r-( N 1:31 , inV 4 �, tail, Q) I 11 Q1 N JJ 1 r1 4•,--1N U r-111 ,'F.. N a) [', (1) v r-{ U A U C U 11 al U > al 11 1 .r N ,--1 al n7 c a O N N'11i N 1-4; '11 1) 0 f.)A, 1-1 a) l L x co u �l 0 Qal o w N • 1 a1 3 3 4.1 v 0 >, a) a U i U) �,.-Y'mosoC .cr)(, 1 CA C'oulvT y 6079RD japEEIASCRS Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration ..00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: ✓�5r4 r As a r nt of Lc= _n- .mac County, _ air writing to You in order to express my concern with resoect 7.3 the current oounty fiscal crisis as it might _.pact Los-:Celes Cour` OceanLifeguard services. MY I are patrons. an woulo out lifeguard services and trier -o" ez ar.r_:_ oa. ._.._ -_' -- ou' extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction ^cogssa- — wholeheartedly endorsethe proposed merger c= the iL eouardService With the Los Angeles County Fire Department. y frmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sicere'v, ��✓c�cwcL .K1,...0664 4-6 r-� rrrc5(. Co -t -co I C41 (70UNT y 66,9ieD Hon. Michael D. Antonovich EPEE U/3- 869 Hall of Administration 00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident cf Los :in7=,' .=s County, - aT. writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current co h h_county fiscal cr_si s as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. 1 i=ecuard ser': ices and thereby e .^`__^ oar___ __.-^ would _be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget _eduction _„ necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the` proposed merger cf the L ifecuard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative whichwill eliminate _inate duplication of services and curtail costs of the -present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. kr-4-t-e-/A Sincerely, V6d W4 u-Lv--t -iJ'j/y� Ali L J.4 (9--e,t)t-el c.,, L 2/t -1j iv /crrosage--4._Co-t-A-nc(lb`l(balvIL,40719,5topekvicsepsHon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration X00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antcnovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard uard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. 1 45� e/,,, 4 / '/' rd est 5;06*- 'S PP/ra 170'4 `j Riic,/. j 7 /7 a�/ti./a4../.. C/14' 20'i0up Sincerely, �9N A'NA'J/ S'1► rower tlouywooa� rLoeiDA. ''r °I274e9/ Pfl 1• R i�-�'moSc.L gc,L CO1t � 64 C'ouN1'y 6o Of SOPER 11`54 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 5,00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby :eoparc_oe beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide oudge_t reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, (-12 /// /, ves � u��`" A ot- qy,v qp4 <D2 11A- r,+ G L -4 (A- 33 V3‘ (ya1) 234/-5/97`17 Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration S00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: Of SC/PERU/546 As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. �) 2+� S(,✓�7) �pr, I,��'� Sincerely, ()et -z-,-( y )3cA, /or /-7 e (CA Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, �.� � off. Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SO0 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, 4,kaAkick bv\c,),,d, Lo\v.(d5 sox Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration SOO West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, (Dvya / owv yitiL Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a rent of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, Hon. Michael D. Antonovich 869 Hall of Administration E00 West Temple Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Supervisor Antonovich: As a resident of Los Angeles County, I am writing to you in order to express my concern with respect to the current county fiscal crisis as it might impact Los Angeles County Ocean Lifeguard services. My family and I are beach patrons. Any plan which would cut lifeguard services and thereby jeopardize beach safety would be an extreme disappointment. Given that county -wide budget reduction is necessary, I wholeheartedly endorse the proposed merger of the Lifeguard Service with the Los Angeles County Fire Department. I firmly believe that this is the only feasible alternative which will eliminate duplication of services and curtail costs of the present bureaucracy while preserving the quality and professionalism of our ocean lifeguards, and the resultant safety of our beaches. Sincerely, ViSi1�Qt / Yl TOti / e-ee h Pry 3 Lfl S • Hr CO Tr_ n� r S. SRUY I. -DLO"- 6j 2 iS1FLOOR 3 2'D cLJOIR . SOT1H Ji CPS TOD: P00 DL" )L-tc 50 'CRTil 6 CaRCSS SECTIC 7. F`;..�Df,T10� 8 FRflThi0 PLO 9 R:Dr �f�flMl PLP ,TS 12. 13. 1 ITflIL S lTftL S [pas R3Y S LA I LIU. ELEU. es. em DLO = fltij 11 itI, • 11 11 11 1, II — 1 Il Yr r 1 t^x I Tl P Yi 2 -o • { 11 P; ,- _- II 11 L 1 ir�,I{I1r. II;� ' l LJtsJui uu t - I. ){ 1 {. uLt. • • { • vittliCitr -4 l ' 30'— RECE'•VED MAY.2 0 1993 PLANNIwG DEPT. es 4, r 11\1.113.10 24 % 38 PRINTED ON IAO. 100011 CLEARPRINT • ;REVISIONS . BY :Yr�d 1—;¢ 1—J T. U, CO c .1 .a u O `7;m • RG�] Date 5 1,/q5 Scale AS SPdt-JN Drawilos6, a�6Fr-i '-Ta 'Job C,K�r. Sheet • Of (5 Sheets 4 0' FD. L&T OCEAN DRIVE 20' 20' SET L&TAC, L.S. 5909 SET L&TAC, L.S. 5909 EX. P.P. 20.00' 19.00' 19.00' 20.00' 0 O FD. P.K. N4/L W.M. v7 cP B' EX, TWO STORY STUCCO RESIDENCE / / / / _/ / _/ /' / / / / / / 1,00' ' . {0 1 GRASS tC) AREA .1� 4 le—WALL !, r NI-IHHH EX, ,BRICK- Wr7r- 1 CRASS AREA 12.6' RET WALL / �. CP • 1 4- \.C21 •• w o. X51 D. ' v. t • o 7 LOT N 13'23'.)1 "W ANINNIISAINININWWWIMIF CONC.' 632.1' 48 • . EX. RET. WALL W/ WOOD FENCE ON TOP 80.03' WALK EX. ONE STORY STUCCO RESIDENCE OVER GARAGE LEVEL F.F.=(110.1) GARAGE LEVEL F.F.-(101.9) 32.1' / / / / _! / / EX. CONC_ • WALK ' / / 1 0 PLANTER N 71 T l—T10_e 7.4, 1 el b/ N J'. .off �'le r cs N 1323'31 "W N 13'23:31 "W 0 vi a POURED CONC. RLT. "III CONC. STEPS DOWN EX. COVERED BRICK PATIO O 13E. Pe 110 Lt sN Cl7 1 105.6 GRD. 1 EXISTING 5' WIDE SANITARY SEWER LOT 49 EASEMENT PER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RECORDS YARD AREA SFr 2X2, TAGGED, L.S. 5909, 6.00' 0/S N'LY & 3.00' 0/S E'LY. EX. WOOD FENCE ON TOP OF POURED CONC. RET WALL til --� e=1'moi 0 �i 6.00' -j�.J' o&k EX. WOOD DECK EX. W000 FENCE ON If WALL & FENCE ON Ip LOT 50 80.03' PACIFIC COAST HWY. 0 3 '9J / 1 g 2.00' ID/Pospeat 4 frc ED. P.K. NNL SET L&TAC, L.S. 5909, 2.00' 0/S N'LY & 2.00' 0/5 WILY IN BRICK PLANTER EX. CONC. BLOCK RET. WALL O N76434'02"E 350.07' LOT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY co 0 h O N FD. SPK. & WASHER_ -4 SCALE': 1/8"=1 '-0" BLC SURVEYING, INC. 1145 ARTESIA BLVD., SUITE 202 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 PH. NO. (310) 379-6488 DRAWN BY: R.J.C. JOB NO: 5125 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 49, TRACT NO. 8386, M.B. 105/92 NOTES: 1) ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED DATUM. 2) THIS MAP ONLY SHOWS EASEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DESCRIPTIONS FURNISHED. 3) FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE FOUND ON THE CORNER RECORD OR RECORD OF SURVEY FILED WITH THE COUNTY SURVEYOR AS REQUIRED. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECVON IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAND SURVEYOR'S ACT AT THE REQUEST OF RAYMOND J. CUESTA ON BEHALF OF GREG TUCKER & BETTE J. TUCKER. ACP d• NORMAN S. GREEN, L.S. 5909 DATE_ OF SURVEY: 4-1-93 RECEIVED MAY 2 0 1993 PLANNING DEPT. 24 ■ 24 MINTED ON NO. 103014 CIEAAP11INT• REVISIONS BY � I{ CV rn 1 o U)= W� O D he w wZ w R� CnCO w Date Cfig/q� Scale ANS 5L1041N Drawn r..d. Job Sheet Of Sheets r • ( AssUt EC> I00.0 -. N] I' I II rz-.7 .'I 1 N / N '-v N II I al 1 I ;I IZ.'IL \' I 11 a S Ef E�G.rC Ira 4 ac 3-1 room is.rr?1-fl0N t4 76; ✓`i-- F=— GO, co NJ ci I �111.Er IZ�.IO a r SITE fl -LYSIS LE-7n- ' c- • NOhl L-� G,r�,'✓ : '.''' H C9 i k2 \ Lam---- +GI a --r Fs-- A ;= I ,NT- i,, (i01a I<•r I' Et- I,~'`H �• 4 ' fI r. 12,2 GSA,. -� Sc:: 1, 014 - 1 J 45 -ki 0-Tra-: -/D' , 1 • - r -P}. R _:-� .^_.L.L. cm i Ei 1'1,c), i. 14 - I f� Fr 1...� , �-,r_ ic) -F c, -r, i:A. G' r - /-4 C r:�-- V. ..&-.L.L__ I--1 F., -,...5L.1 k t-1 `=tdT>' r' " f=i 1-x1 V;,I-.{ To, GI r.i 1%a''r--1 . c r� a rz -j-c wl kI 1= r f -iss r.; u -a- t _. - (O I.0 -2--To 1 0-1-74.12-:.-1- i ° Kl A ! L... 'r- __'..,HHi i t•--ICHii L E T- tc -1 (.7- t\. L.. 4> FU P_ - LiT'--,.. : � ' U --E-Ti.-NI T -_r<— ' 1,1' 0 G.&E • p rni'. r-1 r„t.'L1..-f- . u r,---_->. A'.-1_ r_TE'r" -1�1 1 `-1-o � . `'%g (-1---1-','i 2 _4- =-.;_. �-:��. �.,�..i•-iC�i T�-/�.F-_ �•' r -�- t"1 �- F rJ iyff� 4. . _-��- J. ems --� �i1'?`. _. ..f - T•1""�`tF•"'.�t- _ I= C.D '. L—_a'� "J --=�. A •-1 .. �i�l� ..:�-- �f-'�'�=-?t , ifir''-'Cf 15.4i Vii: t=- rt =a cs, . RECEIVED MAY 2 0 1993 PLANNING DEPT. 24 X 94 PRINTED ON NO. 100011 CIFARPRINT • REVISIONS BY Date 5. same is Drawn"'(ot n1l i e(!,4 _Job Of Sheets • • -nr...Ashk Lo9(IEE_• C n _ wigpm TO 4L6 L TALL . To E)..,E • RECEIVED MAY 2 0 1993 PLANNII G DEPT. L 2* X 36 PRINTED ON NO. 100011 CLEARPRINT • REVISIONS BY /i3Jg3►°G. NJ( Date"'. /5/g3 - 1 t 1 II Scale q. Drawh'�p�7 �1�bEC.j Job ii O 1 Iv Nei ZxO I 1: 21ni;1,,l -r --i— 7 r .y : 4. ZD3 > "°.r_ j , _3 I co —I -- if: F BSS>Fb L-1 I2>-' I: ' Iq -6, i_Co5 c. r. 414, ATE I «xii E i J, 0 1 `-)E.G. Rl1.i' RECEIVED MAY 2 0 1993 PLANNING DEPT. 20 X 36 PRINTED ON NO. 100044 CLEARPRINT • •eY REVISIONS BY G-cP 4 RTTc' Tf 1C hd [BERG: DES] Date 5i/ 7Cj3 Scale, It 11-0II - Drawn- bikj, [-r 1'`t Job_ tiGKEa f— ' Sheet 3.. Of Sheets rt 4 n • • I I I: -a 1\E-1 Gon�o�N!Ny��s --%- - EUiz sX Krl MCI i iO�ls rJ61.,1 i•Ye' 1'Ar-I,-' 64•17-- 4 ar C! a r -,- I I , Ili % I l t 11ii I i; 111 J {.. Li _uti_�F 1 r -4--- tis'�L .f i 1. 1: u u ll 181 .__7._ i II 1, il c !1il, II Ii ppp{,I „,'i 11 ,., :.LL. i.Erb- 71 TH II ,I �i Ey 1 1 P 'il II PA'—pe-!„ ; UALL 12 r�' i ) -I, 4' / X411: G flAri 12 ; 12-- 1,,J/ cor 2o. ;!_.I;tNIC! �s ��TJGGD 1' n &' 3 F -,z- C -!A. u t, fSLrVGGOTD MArGH hl !L ;•r LI 1io.tG1% 51r G i -.Go ,C'�... C • �. Its- I • 1 —1,--1.1N112 IDJr 1/7.121,!!"6 Tb r_oD F Vic - I r. 1. I '• ' 1' �.r111. 11; l)t 1 IJ '11 I 41111 1, I; h f7 L iui 1 I, r+`cfi� (I IU.G) �I07.0 s �Y 14 rl rim :Pei-, L,ipt-i---t-o (fit SAI N - i ;. 1141r .LIELL. r,c-ore- 1004- , oo4- • /7/ 1 28 PRINTEO ON NO. 100014 CLEARPRINT • 1 T 14 -Lys --',mac % _ -...L� GI =a 1 74311 eta.<WlNod!J ZNbFt 110.r'EF I o Er 1n -fittrur,• 101,1 RECEIVED MAY 2 0 1993 PLANNING DEPT. 'REVISIONS. BY •e v t Date ,S•/5 /q3 1 «. I Scale /,r ='1 —o Drawn UrJ i �j> j Job: �=X IC C+�.,�)_ it --r'2-0---ar- ¶r cKf r 85 © e;; -r -t I II mi A TSI -- -,� 4ETgAcK 6 I < '- LAM K, M7L'r tr;-1-\. I zI' F-10 [=Z. • t. czo TO 11A Z L. d S -O LL1 v rYjS T� � eoTToy, , ra F" !2 ri i --9 it 1 • RECEIVED MAY 2 0 1993 PLANNING DEPT, , REVISIONS BY 1 • 850_ 8TH, PLACE,. HERMOSA BEACH,CA.s9z54 160.0 HARPER _ AVENUE, . REDONDQ_:BEACH,_ CA 90278 34 X f4 MINTED DK NO. 100044 CILUIMINT • • �� s1 r bra - • t • 9 -Ln c-orle, Hltf' 1t4L'-El,} 1K'JCTALLEi-2 t I si .�!l �#= . ice:, . I -amu C 'x Pa •""6-‘-"r--i!`--'- IGE-C Vi1IPt4forjr 1 •-- Gor1('C,�,?no� >tilt; 11 ict mo-. x y� zx I2 da' la oL TS , .7-;61NIPL 11 r' ; 11 ry 4,T1 ctUo I ;'e15 ; I fIL.l' . z -C� is 9 i r! I 1;1: I'll 1 ---= -.- r Hl C co _D `SI . 'J tr;� tht LII r1At4 `IFsc-(v Ra I Lam.. FI-c`''e'lIciacror�S No 475 • -(<_05.tJ NIo 37.. 1 tri - LA -I-1(5 f .j ' /41_ I~./4a.r l/j _ ti H F/z)_ ., - it)/R--c•o ts) f, `.; Ea. -1;4 EEta FI?( Z ; a 1 •1 jI-0 a, io i c k 1 „ -G'QIZft) `Y.Xfo ty ni. '1 ye ce pi„TYP :ssrliThrt Y6 C.13 46 lit, Et-, /Go � NIN 71. t -J / Cs x.e - 4J I , 4- x I-1 1,4 lair rjt!%»i ) t.1/a71I ( -to 1.1FT) I 'J--cr 5(x‘ Ceti; A-1- I~/ t.._. �t-w .L41:12_,- .. G tz � 4tA- t-k+F-"T 7 I IIT - 1, -4 4) Gakj-i--: W/GI'XIZ"CIzx� 1 ofc e Cr ti 1 a Wes# i r. J 11 — 1 I {t RN rt 4-0— i. "y --Ce; /' la Ore: =;-.sa ILL t?lCcre, cc- :-,Ij`aG.-c it LT ei N LINE Te (_21te. E.X11y—t {nic RECEIVED Mar 2 01993 PLANNING DEPT, 21 X 30 PRINTED ON NO. 1000N CIYNPRINT • REVISIONS BY 'bate: 515/13' Scale%11.1-1 I II Drawrf 6 ti t4i L t Job�ilGK� • b -SHE 1f ALL SYSTEM' uncrer t4e+4:rc COLT SPG. PLATE iusrt6 ::: x 7. A35e 164 e ":3/8', STRUCTi ) -n PLYWOOD NTH bD NAILS a 6' D.G. 0 BOVFOARIES'AND MSS AND 12' O.G. IR rem BLOCK I, ' • 264 23 56 20 6 10 3/8' STRllGTURAt. it PLYWObv WiIH 8D NAILS' to 4' OL.' e SOUNDARJES AND E06E5 AND 12' c.c. IN FED.. BLOCK '• 'ALL trees. (TABLP 23-r tIBc) ` , " • 384 20 . 14' 4 • t .USE 1/2' SPAGIN6 FOR ANCHOR BOLT5J6d NAILS AND A35 CLIP Het %EAR PAtt35 ARE SIDES OF TFE WALL ; .. . . 2 KAIL'PLYWOOD DIRECTLY TO RIM JOIST OR SOLID BLOCKS ram BOIhCARY MAIMS. USE SX NOMINAL PLATE. 4 FOR MST** FOUNDAT{OtS USE NILT11/2' DIME DIAta H8>6E ANCHORS H1111 T' EtteMMENT INTO CONCRETE. 5 ALL NAILS SHAt.L: BE COMMON OR. &ALVAMZE BOX. ZxtC_oNITltJO0.4 -/---4)'4 11/.2, t tib - 17 --Le 1: 2ocK5T C7oaC� I1 (gt.: Com, t0 _.... e tom; c- . 42 / ,zo x15 HO 42_ RECEIVED MAY 2.0 1993 PLANNING DEPT. 24 [ EE - PRINTED ON NO. 1600N CIIMMINT • REVISIONS .: BY Date_ 5 5113: E t ,Seale_) -O Drawnf2.U119 E12,1, . "JOb' L1C.:1 -1Z': `, / 2 p...1,1 . CA t ta, y r c-1 F�sH'1,J4fl zV A-- r., e. y' 16 4,6.. a NAT Li -,u 4.-- f1A1611 ttGIA 7 • • \(- • c.JC writ crit t 17 Ive 14r,*; 12 Vk<; t Its 1 •.m t i lifilil-g2t7 c i - 1 -6n -I ',till t, F1 ")'V7 tN4-1E c< . ,• /10 / 'l'�^,rte ! 0/ 1 I trAvCc--1. a s. a+ C. CG Ni G z�tZe1 o. IZ 1Z 11 ._.1k. -30 F /f, L, �: O U F. •r KIN�j p. FTEr- 1 t kI 1.F,.t?- RECEIVED MAY 2 0 1993 • PLANNING DEPT. REVISIONS BY 24 X 8! PRINTED ON NO. 100011 CLL1RPRR T • Data .2 A:13 scata'Y�'_ Drawn ju1,14-1rriVCf " 24 2 36 PRINTED ON 110. 100011 CIIIARM"RT • 'REVISION • BY 'Date 515 /eL3 •Seale A.47'SI-101-I14 - Drawn (00:44" el Job fliCKa.� • • ::i = i n Cf"(Le jI ;II I 1 iFF• 1 IT2 4,x10 ANCHOR BOLT .. - , -E..'' _ .Z=JiD`\;L�A' -Z:74. t ; [! ,. '60Y?_i eirf att..- 1t%C9 - - tt » _ - PER SHEAR SCHED. HEIGHT: IS; X-5ItEL I fi 1 ;, . 41 111 I. I (�I' , t I f`�n a • X (}°1-%- hN �' 8' THK, GONG. . 2'-0" I'-6" u4 ®a4" { :.. _ --7----1-4±.. F F 3'-O': 2'-O"•- , #4 0 24" , I _• ' - J. _.i _ ' T { q i s _ /a4 BARS M. ®.24" J. .17717,-1-1- li i' i ' i I 1 1 I . ; 1 i (y" L.. L •.. ____ * 5'-0" 3'-O" u5 0 1b ..' ..21 !__.1.1L-3,..1_:_'1,... I 1Th1v �. ) I. I 51 f . -/'•' ': �__:!: � 1 ; , 1 1 sit - / s1&3� ><4, o'ab" O.G. ��G�-. 8� . `Oela yy (ID.NO. 42/20) *u` !PIM, ✓ �-- BAFt - .'- I �:rel �(. I. ,Z -` IL _ pb� Yr. r�• -1 - i IOd®6,10- - .. tell ,IIr�• O /•. _ PR 8 DEAPIT�\R�P� OOHING Z...„e�-�_, E ,f ' �' „o j� Cot ----r.. - IO d ®Ib` O.G. , tt5 MATCH VERT. BAR SPEC. ► f _ _., ��T 'W i I6 d 0 Ib" D.G. " - r+'......,�f.. // .. n= , ` .. . 3-1/2" CONCRETE SLAB' /nR - pj 1„ 1—.� - , e p'. b .po W/ 6x6 -VI 1,4 x H1.4 rc t (� (�D Y•a- �_ _•I!,11_,:..,t I, 1 .. I _i `v M 7 , WELDED WIRE MESH i-• ZX �'�/•�.�li j '- �-I 111111111111-1... ., ral- .. . %�( y1 I 1 •. �O r ( Iri , { ; 1....a ' FLUSH ��!¢ i��•k LUa✓;1 P p T h�OC - _ r, _ _ I• NATURAL GRAD OR .. EARS - .._ r 4444 .......• - e:.3z'' �' — L,.- {_ l `.' ebTFT`re ToP DoT e Toe �i Fr`t-0 Tore/ J i s op. 2' x BLK'6. � • .11 .`. •. ' in i _ { `_`. /.�_ fl-. DrQAe 'i LJT 20PPE0TI0h ' - Nt4 �� p I 8 B • �( DI R,o GN O TA -\1-L 1-•J RI 9ATIO:kJ '.: 0, 1 i_._:_ NTS �- „IA � inr• 'DS% Iiil'T E 1( irine* ry (�(•D(Ov iEPDXY ANCHORING . REBA.»R.AND . A: NG.BOLTS N- -_ 4oTCP.24 ._ 2� • sjO✓ cka� HARD_ E1�._-D CONCRETE'' , . - . 45,Coue�a al SCOPE �� a 07: - - r � %,%d I ley -b iy- TINS SECTION SPECIFIES ' , 'ASTM A307 ANCHOR TR INSTALLATIONS or ASTM A6I5 GRADE 40 AHD 60 RCIN'ORGIN6 BARS FLIM BOLTS (WITHOUT HEADS - - 11 ' - 5/6 ("Tr i,F'LYWDoD - CO: C iii•0' •10' 19 W.WrI1• . EPDXY AD1f5NE ORRFBAA OR NOOKS) M NARDEMD 2000 FSI LONCRETEJ/SIN6 AN . THE EI-BEDFFMS )18JIGATED HEREIN WILL DEVELOP THE Fl1LL N LO4W3LE STRE4BT . • - _ _-HY.LSG1 - _ ff�"`'+ . ID. N0:42/20 - • EPDXY ADHESIVE IOd 6,10 V USE AN EPDXY GROUT A9 LISTED BELOW. INSTALL PER KMIPAG7UtE REGOF4E DATONS AID IN his \ / ' OVRRR M THIS AS SPECIFICATON �I 16d C` a• ONEPDXY C ER= D9"ARTH@rT FOR MY SPECIFIC 7ESTNG REpAROLVT9 OR RESTRICTIONS RICH MAY BE USED. RECOI.BOFD BOXY GROUTS ARE AS POLLpµS (OR M p �n y). •6-12. APPROVED PRIOR p ( -' Tri :C -- IOd ®b"OCG. - - f P Li B.N. \---:- � /. aDYEVIVE mu naLOer coRPORAt10N •Its Zoo EPOxY OCeo NO. ssSD) ILIA- 1.— �� li 12 - { 1� IIi Ai _ . ,._ C NCRE4IVF Loa . LPL wore M, Grr OILY ACCEPT Tie trout) . - _ / IrF ..,T' fi • ..} .1 N{, 111., �.� 1 1 CI 1 f/• air PROCESS 16 i7! GRADE D OR L R"®. no Mi4-YJSOD ARHY CORPS or EN61t8RS) { {2• - ,' e i+u� �• �Ilr�t'i0 roAtri DRILLING _. �y7,,J�' yv �� '' - ON T@ DRAHIN65 he HOLD 512E5 TOR REIIFORL&IB RODS I.1✓DIFADl259 -. 1 ✓cc 1 1 0�'1 ♦-r..00R JOIST t-�• • 8 LE SS - � OL�L • \ 1 aV ! • DIA. BOLT elute ZE HOLE . HOLE IDEP 14 DEEM HOLE PERIL . . - : - -• • • _, 'COOT- I I 1 f ••�T - . V4' WA 8/4` S• - WA WA --- ELEY/10r) iciA'� vi5U ` 11 d ,I S8: 5 vro. 6' �• . (SEE r V . A . 8/4' I ' , : 6 ' 14V4• ' T -V2• 10' 12-V2• -, - IF -25,11 •�"� ��r _ 2"x BLOCKING OR RIM DIST A35'5 SHEAR PANEL 1• 'Ai) r ' yLf y -. VD' - 1• 1 i v+• . T I -Vo• 6-V2• I2• 14-V2' .. . ' D .. 'I-5/4' R-1/2• ' 'I5 -v2 _ 164/2• V2• r SCHEDULE FOR • " , Io z -v4• _ • ii• n• zI C--6•ti 195-1-A I SPACING) 2.. ' e T Y ��d r� e — 4444 . 4./45...•1.0 ✓ ' 1 1 INSTALLATION - , NTS • -.. /04tt II, 011. - - - . - toREH OVE ALL G PILL he IIDLE D) INSTILL- BOLT D $c RIzoNTAl. - - 011.4AT Al RVs EGALLE�PRROM CONCRETE ARE R EMBEDDED. HATER OR LOOSE MATERIAL ' APPROXIMATELY V2 RAL he EPDXY GROUT. - OR REI/FORUKale,Ne ROD, SECURE P. AW PILL HOLE COMPLETELY WITH SOUL,4 HOLES . PRIME Ho E5 HIT1 EPDXY GRa)r. ADD SIFFICIENT SAND TO TtR DRa/1 TO . ' .. .. OBTAIN 21310 GROUT. S1.1RP CONSISTENCY. INSTALL ET•®®D® 1704 AS SPECIFIED ABOVP• USING he BOXY -. • • -1434 �1 JCIbFi. - commons 1'OOTWG . I-`.`( L.1000 o0 • . , 'PJIsmNG ' PLYWOOD EDGE NAILING ., I cowr. POOTNNG $" 4et.If I a 11 I 2"x RIPPING 0 4'- STAGGERED W/ 8-bd sol I I ." ( EACH RAFTER - -_ o• 11-111--t- ' -AI 10d o 6"OCG. , L 5�9 s'r�•�' PLYWOOD EDGE NAILING/' - - PLYWOOD BOUND NAILING D, DRILL t GROvr 112.j. IIT •t, / I1 '►7I Ibd ID. Nb. 42/20 IOd 6,10 • 2' MIN. - d d • �DaE15 ooe ret LwHEi SPECS Ti 1 FOR RECD e+s®LENT) ._.'_._ f (4),I6cl PER' . •- • ., �t, }� � • - __ I. TOP B�LONe '..._ •..u.... �1/,'r•. 3. MIN• • � - - is ( • BLOCKING OR (3) Ibd PER BLOCK✓ • . - , 1 4 BAR TOP t BOTTOM _ . till Cots bg:. _ FLOOR JOIST 2x RIM JOIST , laPi I iwlcAitiRoosFrrcur ' coNrtlN o s FOOTING ' . '.7-4 XlbTltd9 f�oolitf9 0001149► 01.r1- To t81 `tel paN -' n11 rep- A35 5 (SEE ROOF Plitt Op p� SMEAR PANEL RAFTER (SEE PLAN FOR SIZE) :..H h t%� MAOSCHEDULE FOR SPAGIN6) 2"x SOLID BLOCKING 0 10•-0' oO'cfilan•,efrrt nr DOUBLE PLATE MAX. AND 0 PARTITIONS (I) SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN ----mu., {1,01 e \�\lLi�IG PTL. jo (2) TOE NAIL BLOCK WHERE NO WALL EXIST BELOW t-rIr21"� N T • • FOR CC PLAN BEAM SIZE SIMPSON POST GAP OR EQUAL - AflC: IF, >_ OUT SEE PLAN FOR BEAM SIZE :.. ,(1TT .. : ,.. . ;- : ' • RECEIVED - MAY 201993 t S , STI2 Q----- .ci;bit,--;RIr i . . .co -r. �Ci yT . Fes-. . ' .' / / r : J5T p, nit, �Ae 1-0 � PLANNING DEPT .D ; . ... • 3-$1; WIC 0it 3Ia�GK 4v Mme'• ` ., I DOUBLE PLATE ' L-Asol5 - ' \•i ' LL . NEM - onnw Matra earn•a .. run lwse �— `�— ' C' . , SHEARWP LL SYa t sift vs sro• An • wa . N C Wy . zm< TOIst. . if. D'Oa 5145 p7C-A a. - - A - OP w t t, L �. I car: (.' ' M MELO.• • - • BOINDAPJE5 A140 ED6E5 NCI TY BLOCK ' ' WOOD POST (SEE PLAN FOR SIZE) .��_ - WOOD POST (SEE PLAN FOR SIZE) •• ... - • - .. _ _... ._- _ _ ..WIT .' . �1 -Ito C� • .- .. 'ALL �6E5. (TABLE 25-K" BBC) 264 JD 36 - ' 20 6 Y - ., { D n3 G • 4. O - /%\ Oro' STRIICTLRN_ 11 PLYHOOD 16TH I:0 NA M E00E5 ANO LT OA MELO. BLOCK • BOUNDARIESll woes. A6E3. f V.BIE 25-K, tea BD4 . - ' 20. 24 14 - 4 ...•{' �� A 01.1a.�. ' - - - -- - 4:11I I 00 /� . NATES. Sr I BI4•DW6 ' ' 1 '. i ' I RiLVIC0 SDAbBOACLiPiYB8QDtty MJN6PANei. P APED ON Ti•ID - 2 wPLYID3PA9vYl MBdJDTsS1Dt ORNAILS 's use 7x funk PLATO . 4 FOR F O5T1N6 FOUNDATIORS 115E Itis In• DIA•C'IER KHT6!! ANCHORS WITH r E!•BEDFPSIT MTOCCNCtai'TE. ' - .. •` � l IO 7L.. `f� 1 G N �Tl� @ � nL� �.��6� s ALL HAll6 B1VJ10E cats -co DR BALVAlaIF BOX ,t .� " 24 2 36 PRINTED ON 110. 100011 CIIIARM"RT • 'REVISION • BY 'Date 515 /eL3 •Seale A.47'SI-101-I14 - Drawn (00:44" el Job fliCKa.� • • ::i a ' r 7.7, ..--, ,rn-.-766__,6..- 1 *tuba 1'tt.•Al!• tt Po>TD CArJets* OA• TOMO 1. 40 .Q65`WML • e Ir ti 4 C *1'1 OA. L.PI.Oi"4w SO E.ID PDS* MATER IALREOwR RK: AStn'A2S,GIIAOCbi C:31 rti a-4 ir-ca frit CL33 FT Allwork and materials shall be in accordance with local building codes: city, county and state currently adopted. Cabinet maker to Verify all appliance model numbers and dimensions to insure proper installation. Notify t10) 315-417 4 immediately if there are any discrepancies on working drawings, or if working drawings conflict with field work before any work is started. Contractor shall be liable for any damages to owner's property as a result of his negligence. -All framing -dimensions -a -e -to face-of'stu4, (F.O.S.), unless -indicated - otherwise. N.T.S. indicates not to scale. Dimensions and notations shall take precedence over scale. FOUNDATION Design soil bearing pressure soil type. All welded wire fabric shall conform to ASTM A185/lap 6". I/ 000 P.S.F. Mud -sills to be 2" x pressure treated D.E. bolted with 1" dia. x 10" bolted 7" min. into concrete @ max. 6'0" o.c. except where noted. Provide metal washers under all' bolt heads and nuts bearing on All bolts through-%/ood'to be drive fit. -Provide weep screed around perimeter of all concrete slabs. ' Provide 2 square feet of vent -'Provide 18"x24." access to all All underfloor areas shall be for each 25 linear ft. underfloor areas. clean of debris. , MASONRY Use Type M mortar 1 part Portland cement, ; part lime putty, 3 parts damp loose sand. Use type N.I. hollow concrete units - solid grouted. Use 2000 P.S'.I. min. @ 28 days conforming to USC STD 24-23 1 part Portland cement 2 parts sand, 2 parts pea gravel. Reinforcing steel ASTM -A615 grade 40 allowable stress 20,000 P.S.I. _STEEL 1. All structural steel shall be A36 conforming to the standards of the American Institute of Steel Construction and the Uniform Building Code being currently used by the jurisdiction. All structural steel should be free of rust and should be prime coated if necessary to prevent rusting at the job site. All columns shall be A53 -B if round steel tube or A-605 if rectangular steel tube. 2. All bolts shall be A307 unless otherwise specified. The size shall be as shown on the plan. All connections shall be considered bearing connections' unless otherwise specified. Typical assembly will be a bolt of length sufficent to pass through all members. A lock washer if connection is subject to vibration and a nut tighted to 50"N minimum. 3. High strength bolts. Unless specifically shown on the plan and specified otherwise, hereon, high strength bolts are not to be used on the project. 4 All connections shall be clean, free of rust, and may be sprayed with.a wood, light oil coating for ease of assembly and may also be primed and painted. after installation. Waterproof all retaining walls adjacent to livable areas and garage. All galvanized iron flashing shall be no less than 26 ga. 1. Foundations must be founded in natural undistrubed soil or compacted • subgrade. In the event that the construction is on natural undisturbed soil; it is possible that the depth shown on the plan 'will be'exceeded by the field conditions. The inspector on the job has the authority to deepen the foundations as he sees fit to insure the embedment ent r eqninemoots are met. Therefore, the quantities of concrete calculated by the use of the plan may be exceeded in the field. The contractor responsible for this trade must make allowances for that contingency in the bid and contract governing this trade. ; 2. Hold down anchors, hold down bolts, purlin anchors and straps which are to be embedded in concrete shall be securely tied in to the form work prior to the'pouring of the concrete. Shall be inspected by the contractor for_the'appropriate depth, embedment, clearances, alignment and demensions. Bolts placed in concrete must have a 3 inch clearance between the edge of the bolt .and dirt, outside the concrete. Further, they must have a clear- ance of six bolt diameters from the edge of the concrete to the edge of the bolt. Caution should be taken, sometimes large holdowns or purlin anchors require depth of footing or 'edge distances greater than the typicals shown on the plan. -In that case, the depth on edge distances shall be increased to accomodate the bolts and the appropriate cover required. All bolts should have standard hooks or bends in conformance with the Uniform Building Code. 3, In the areas where concrete block are. to be placed on top of poured concrete foundations the requirement is to set first course of wet concrete. It is to be the responsibility of the Concrete Contractor to place said block in the concrete at the time of the pour unless, otherwise agreed in writing. 4_, Unless otherwise 'specified hereon the minimum strength of concrete to be delivered here on the job site for any purposes whatsoever including sTyrry backfill shall have a mix design of not less of 2,000P.S.I. 5 For Concrete strength higher than 2,000 P.S.I. inspection by a Deputy Inspector is required during the preparation, placement and curing of said concrete. Inspection reports' prepared by the Deputy Inspector should be issued to. the Engineer on the job and to the local jurisdiction indicating the procedures, quality of the pour and the inspectors actions during the pour. 6 Isolated pads shall be buried sufficently in the ground to provide adequate bearing. Again this may be in excess of the minimum dimensions shown on the plans based on the field conditions. The' contractor- should provide for that contingency in the bid and contract. 7. Isolated pads are normally intended to be placed below the level of the concrete slab around them. Further, it is permisable to pour over tine"top of the bolts, bearing plate and bottom of the post provided it is not specifically prohibited. 8. There should be no direct contact between the wood members and concrete unless the wood member is properly prepared for said contact by the process of. pressure treating. Columns are intended to have a spacer of at least '26 gage sheet metal betw.e'en the contact and the wooden post. Most prefabri- cated pieces of hardware are designed to provide that. It is the contractor§ responsibility to see that said'hardware is appropriately installed to prevent the wood from concrete contact or.,t-o place sheet metal to prevent that contact. 9 Unless otherwise shown on the plan all rebar required in the foundation shall be properly anchored, shall be terminated with standard 180 degree bend or standard 90 degree bend and shall be spaced so as to meet the minimum clearance distance' requirements and shall have the minimum embedment requirements. 10. Reforcement bars -called for in various isolated pads arc intended to be placed in the bottom portion of the pads with the appropriate 3" clearance from the exposed soil. In order to accomplish this the steel should be placed on pieces.of masonary, concrete or other approved spacing devices to insure proper placement: Reinforcement rods should not be placed on the ground and lifted into position during the pour. They should in fact be securely fastened to the form prior to placement of the concrete. 11. Concrete should not be mixed on site unless specifically allowed under these plans. Concrete shall be -mixed by ready mix trucks delivered on site. Water shall not be added on site if it will exceed the design mix. Placing the concrete shall be in conformance of the requirements of Chapter 26; of the Uniform Building Code. ' 12.Numerous foundation plans and foundations details on the planscallfor monolithic pour of the footing and slab. If it is not the contractors intention to make such monolithic pour he should receive approval from . the inspector and Triad Design Assoc., Inc. prior to placing -cold joints .- in the pour. - 5. Where bearing plates are''in contact with concrete thay shall' be carefully drypacked to insure that There are no voids under the bearing plate, so that uniform bearing is achieved. WELDING Welds shall conform to the Standard Code for Arc and Gas Welding of the American Welding Society. ' E-70XX electrodes for A36 steel. . Welding will be performed by certified special inspector or in the shop of an welders under supervision fabricator. approved Gator. f of a A certificate of fabrication from the shop performing the welding or a report from the special inspector must be furnished to the job" inspector prior to framing approval. ' FRAMING WOOD FRAMING 1. All wood framing would be done in accordance with the current Uniform Building Code required by law for the project. All provisions as a . conventional construction portion of the Chapter 25 of the Uniform Building Code shall be used if more restrictive than the specifications and those stated hereon or where specifications are silent. The nailing schedule of the Uniform Code will be used when the plans or General Notes hereon are silent. Where the General Notes, Specification and Uniform 'Building Code are in conflict the Building Code are in conflict the Building Code shall gpver•n. t Secondarily, the specifications as shown on the plans and thirdly the Notes. - Framing Lumber Shall be Douglas Fir/Larch, except where {noted. 2x floor joists No. 2 ' 2x roof joist _ No. 2 4x beams No. 1 6x beams or greater as noted 2x4 or 4x4 studs or posts standard or stud grade 6x posts or'greater D.F. tl All glued laminated lumber shall conform to city, county and state codes and current A.I.T.C. standards. A certification of fabrication shall be submitted to local building department for approval. Plywood Used as floor or roof sheathing or at shear walls shall conform to ;PS -1-74 and shall be stamp -graded by the American Plywood Association. (Plywood shall be interior type with exterior glue. Use exterior grade -where exposed to the weather. All wall studs shall be 2x4 @ 16" o.c'. unless otherwise stated. Provide 1x6 diagonal bracing at corners and every 25' of wall and all cripple wall over 4'0" high. Where plumbing, heating or other pipes ,are placed in or partly in a partition, necessitating the cutting of the plates or when plates do not have approved lapping, a metal tie strap of not less than 1/8" thickness and 1'," width shall be fastened to the plate across and to each side of the opening with not less than 4 16d nails on each side. Flash all exterior openings with sisalcraft or equal. Provide U.B.C. req. attic vents, screen backed above ceilings. Legend - Direction of 2x unless otherwise noted. Limit of Members p. D Indicates shear panel walls (see schedule), I . .All prefab. fireplaces and,,flues shall be installed in `strict accordance with mfgrs. specs. and conform to all city, county and state building and fire codes. Lath and plaster per Chapter 47 U.B.C. Roofing nails to be galvanized iron. -SIZE, HEIGHT AND SPACING OF WOOD STUDS+ STUD SUL (fnct+s,) SEARING WALLS • NONSEARING WALLS MURAL UNSUPPORTED STUD • liOGHT7 (rt+') SUPPORTING ROOF MD CEILING ONLY nom) SUPPORTING ONE FLOOR, R r AND CEILING (IneM+) SUPPORTING TWO FLOORS, ROOF AND CEILING Qnctws) LATERAL UNSUPPORTED STUD HFIGNTI (Ent) , ' SPACING t+ +I 1.2x32 — — ' — — 10 16 2.2x4 .10 _._ __-'24 16 14 " _24ri - 3. 3 x 4 10 24 - 24 . ' 16 14 ' 24 4. 2 x 5 ) 10 24 24 ' — 16 ` 24 5.2 x 6 10 24 24 16 20 24 'Utility grade studs shall not be spaced more than 16 inches on center, nor support more than' a roof and ceiling, nor exceed 8 feet in height for exterior walls and load bearing or 10 feet for interior nonload-bearing walls. , 2Shall not be used in exterior walls. 'Listed heights are distances between points of lateral support placed perpendicular to the plax of the wall. increases in supported height are permitted where justified by an analysis. CUTTING, NOT WING AND BORING OF STUDS J EXTERIOR WALLS AND HEARING WALLS' . W 0 Section 2518(f) 10 & 11 - 1975 Lon Angeles County Code Maximum sizes as follows:" Bored holes - Maximum size hole - 4O of width 2x4 - 1.4" (1-3/6") dia. hole..' 2x6 2.2" (2-3/16") dia. hole ored holes in.double studs - Maximum size hole in doubled studs - 60'79 of width. No Mort than 2 adjoinitz double studs to be bored. - 2x4 - 2.1" (2-1/8") dia hole ' 2x6 - 3.3" (3-5/16") dia. hole i Notches- Maximum depth 25% of width 2x4 - .87" )718")' deep notch 2x6 - 1.37" (1-3/8") deep notch • Bored holes - Maximum size hole - 60% of width. 2x4.- 2.1 (2-1/8") dia. hole . •'2xS;= 3.3" (3-5/16") dia: hole Notches ; Maximum depth - 40% of width 2x4 - 1.4-(1-3/8") deep notch 2x6 - 2,2" '(2-3/16") deep notch , INTEnIOR NON-BEARING . *Portion of stud remaining at notches or holes . shall be sound wood without excessive strength reducing properties such as knots, breaks, splits, excessive slope of grain, etc. ELECTR[C I �t Mb:.::'DLS —0 PUPLT,x CONVENIENCE WALL l} WP Ci CFI „ „ OUTLET FLOOR OUTLET WEATHERr'ROOF OUTLET GROUND FAULT INTERUPTER OUTLET SPECIAf, PURPOSE OUTLET 220 VOLT OUTLET REC[SSED LIGHT FIXTURE j W .LL HUNG LiGHT FIXTURE t CEILING HUNG' WALL.OUTLET OUTDOOR FLOOD LIGHT 0 SINGLE POLE UTILITY SWITCH 3 WAY SINGLE POLE UTILITY SWITCH SINGLE POLE DINER SWITCH TV ANTENNA HOOK UP CABLE HOOK 'UP TELEPHONE POOR UP goon BELL WITH CHIMES SMOKE DETECTOR WALL HEAT REGISTER �, FLOOR HEAT REGISTER / Vf tArC , RETURN AIR GRILL/ REGISTER REMODELS ' In the event that portions or the entire structure is being'\remodeled, the existing conditions shown on the planare an estimate of the field conditon only. Each and every contractor, material man or supplier working on the job should carefully review the requirement of his skill or trade with the actual conditions on'the site. tie should verify those'conditions which , would affect his, trade or activity and any and all prices given the - general contractor or owner should reflect the impact or uncertaintly of those field conditions. The designer of the project is not responsibility. for the failure of the contractor to confirm the existfhg conditions in . the- field and appropriately price his work. The contractor and the owner should carefully negotiate a,contract that provides for deficiencies in the field, discoveries of different condition's and how the contract may be adjusted based on these discoveries, f M } • 7 1 , 3° 3 'S 1 Z s 3° -o I 3,6 -8 tg I 2_e 3.- i3 SIZE HT GTY 1 Z 1- 1 Z , 1 1 TYPE 0:11 \1 .ENC -FI tL\AIr4 U0 I' I' It u n II (44-615uI m1 < ft,AtiA LICoO ‘Li 01'49 LL.A55 Pi -F01-0 AREA. DESCRIPTION Sale 14-1 FLooP. E , � > T E. R-10 12- i'LlrTH t,Ii9H ✓ETs tlwog. 5 114" EA 2 Nt2rAig— FLo0P C1-Al2 o4-Kl=T ono r- l L.ouve 1a6 til DESCRIPTION THR '(ES I it 0 Fi o GLASS SCRN iJo v Nit) N0 Flo Yts -(6•S No SCRN .1 REMARKS rtNEc-ri �L. �iNc4tE` 41E- saL'12 e -o p.E- �A u. k200 .- I,J,N. ►%0012- S -T O R A i e_. I-I6LLo0 tor,� '('II E rc-r1 aL_ IJoLLow ooze. REMARKS S'(. FLoop- 3 Cr arr ROOM FLOOR H�:I ►�i� tib (T Tt U .' LI/)x SND FLaa - �i 1-1 I LIC1 — /10,Isi;12F19 L 41we -oUT Y6 c1L14“ rtLUc-K OZ. /qv k -OUT TE I -I r E IJ" I x (r I) T- 1-112p- G P Q 0 WALL CEILING ES 1HE2+'^41-i=- -t5 Yes NF2ripeL iIo jjEr�r1P REMARKS____. .ALL INTERIOR -FINISHES TO MEET CLASS T1I FLAME SPREAD. _CLASSIFICATION l ST FL�g- 2 wo FL oo �. rta'sTE e p x °ooE L7cC-K rISeeIr,« .,7e atiret....ti..s .,mow • RECEIVED MAY 2 0 1993 PLANNING DEPT. LEGA! • DFSCR! T?ON: LOT , TRACT . •-• ! f - ... 113 a 1RG. ER AVENUE, REDOO OWNER: CC" LIS: �CTTC T,,C;;�ti ':,. 850 •8TH. PL<CE'HEriMOSA OEACH C4\.90?4': - , i DRAWN BY t X I CHECKED BY . APPROVED BY AS DATE] JJ� REVISIONS . o DATE 5 /5/cig JOB' i iUG)Eirt SHEET NO. I OF :' ' SHEETS 4 an{ p2i _� �tf`.----•,t ( N.-) fa^z` . Any new building of occupancy R (except apartment houses with four or more �}-;•,,.. 1;` w t k,,'t-' C "''' ) , habitable stories and hotels) shall have all of the following features and - S^,•,'' K, ... tdr:vicrs: ,CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 2-5352 ` (a) MANDiTORY FEATURES AND DEVICES CERTIFICATE OF CbMPLIANCE:•Residential (part 1 of 2) CF -1R page 3 of 13 Project Name: Tucker Addition Address: 850 8th Place 'Hermosa Beach, CA Designer: Sunberg Design Documentation: Math/Tec, Inc. 90254 Date: 4/28/1993 Building Permit No Checked by / Date COMPLY 24 User, 1075 GENERAL INFORMATION Compliance Method:, Climate Zone: Conditioned Floor Area:, Building Type: ' , •Building Fropt Orientation: Number of,Dwelling Units: Floor Construction Type: BUILDING SHELL INSULATION Component R-13 Wall,W.13.2x.4.16) R-•19 Roof Deck R-19 Roof Slab Perimeter w/R-0.0 FENESTRATION Orient. " Area 'U -Val Type COMPLY 24 version 4.10 6 883 sqft Single Fam Det 0 deg (N) 1 • Slab on Grade U -Value, Location/Comments 0.088- Addition 0.051 Addition 0.050 Addition 0.900 Addition Shading Devices Frame Interior ' Exterior OH SF Type :_Left (E) 39.5 0.75'TJouble none 'Left (E) 10.0. 0.57 Double -Back (S) 16.0 0.75 Double Right `(if) - 28.0 0.75 Double Right ,(W) 149.3 0.75 Double THERMAL MASS .Type _ Covering none none none • none Light Blind Mtl none none none' none Area (sf) Thick (in) Location/Description Concrete, Heavyweight' Exposed N' N Metal N N None N ' N Metal - Y N Metal Y N Metal 390.'3.50 Slab on Grade CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (part 2 of 2)' CF -1R page 4 of 13 •Project Name: Tucker Addition Documentation: Math/Tec, Inc. Date: 4/28/1993 ' COMPLY 24 User 1075 HVAC"SYSTEMS)Mininum ,Distrib Type Duct TStat • -System Type Efficiency, and Location RVal Type Location/Comments Furnace 0.800-AFUE Ducts in Attic l.o Cooling.10.000'SEER Ducts in Attic WATER HEATING SYSTEMS • System Name 4.2'SetBck HVAC E Addition 4.2 SetBck Water Heater Distribution -Type• Type SUPER SAVER'SE5OXRT(SG) Standard AFUE WATER,HEATER EQUIPMENT DETAIL - /Rec -Rated Stdby Tank Pilot, --System Name , System Type Eff ' Input Loss R -Val Light No. Tank Ext. in Energy Size Insul Sys Factor (gal) R' -Val StorGas 1 0.58 47.5 12.0 SUPER SAVER SE50XRT(SG)_,. DomesticHW 0.850. 40000 0.036 0.0 • SPECIAL FEATURES/REMARKS -COMPLIAt10E STATEMENT - - This Certificate-cf-Compliance lists.the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 .& 6 of the Califor- nia.Code.of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement ,them. This certificate has-been signed by the individual with overall design'responsibility.'When this certificate' of compliance is submitted for a single building plan to be,built in multiple orientations, any shading . ifeature that is varied is indicated in the Special, Features/Remarks section DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Benito Ramirez Math/Tec, Inc. 118 -South Catalina Ave. - Redondo -Beach., CA (310) 374--8959 DESIGNER or OWNER (Per Business.& Professions Sunberg-Design 1600 Harper AVe. Redondo Beach, CA 90278 • (s%gnature) Ti}FORCEr'SENT -. Name Title: Tgency: T clr'pbnne: {'' Y • 'KY . AGENCY Code) .. 90277 t/,17 J (devt'e) • /it/ (signature) CBCI Certificati tel ,9%, (date) r: -.PES -90-4033. '. (s ignaturc/:creep) -(Fate) Ceiling -Insulation_ The opaque portions of ceilings separating condi- tioned spaces from unconditioned spaces shall meet the requirements of either (1) or (2) below. . (1) Ceilings shall he insulated between framing members with insulation having an installed thermal resistance of R-19 or greater. Insulation equivalent members on which is not -penetrated by framing minimum R -value which includes the the above R-19 insulated ceiling. members may meet an effects of framing (2) The weighted average U -value of ceilings shall not e-ceed that which' would result from using the insulation Indicated In Section 2-5352(x)(1), including the effects of framing members. (b) Looses_ Fill Insulation. When Ioose fill insulation is installed, tie .^.inirnum installed weight per square foot shall conform with the insul- ation nanufacturer's installed design density per square foot at the manufacturer's labeled R value. (c) ';all Insulation. The opaque portions of wood frame walls separating con- ditioned spaces from unconditioned spaces shall meet the requireaents of either (1) or (2) below. (1) Wcod-fraced walls shall be insulated between £rasing insulation having an installed thermal resistance greater. Foundation walls of heated basements or spaces shall be insulated above the adjacent outside with insulation having an installed thermal resistance Insulation equivalent members on members with of R-11 or heated crawl. ground line of R-7. which is not penetrated by framing members ray meet an minimum R -value which includes the effects of framing the above R -values. (2) The weighted average U -value of walls shall not exceed that which would result from using the insulation indicated in Section 2-5363(c)(1), including the effects of framing members. (d) Infiltration Control. (1) (2) (3) Doors and windows between conditioned and unconditioned 'spaces, such as garages arv] closets for central forced air gas furnaces (which use outside air for combustion) shall be fully weather stripped. The following 'openings in the building envelope shall be caulked or otherwise sealed to limit infiltration: (A) Exterior joints around windows and door frames, between wall soleplates and floors, and between exterior wall panels; (B) Openings for ' ceilings, and (C) Openings interior (D) All plumbing, electricity and gas lines in walls, floors; in the attic floor (such as where ceiling panels meet and exterior walls and masonry fireplaces);_and other such openings in the building envelope. doors and windows shall be certified and labeled indi.- they deet the appropriate standards listed in Table Manufactured eating that 2-53V. TABLE 2-53V. STANDARDS FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS Type' Aluminum Prime Windows Aluminum Sliding Class !Aluminum Combination Windows r i Aluminum Storm Doors Standard ANSI/AAXA 302.9 - 1977 Doors ANSI/AkMA 402.9 - 1977 Storm Wood Flush Doors - • Wood Windows Wood Sliding Patio Doors Ponderosa Pine • Doors Wood Panel Doors Exterior Wood Swinging Doors ANSI/AAMA ANSI/LAMA ANSI/h'WMA ANSI/NEMA t ANSI/NLa714 ANSI/N'..Y.A 1002.10 - 1980 1102.7 - 1977 : I.S.1 - 80 I.S.2 - 80 I.5.3 - 70 I.S.5 - 73 • FKDA/7 - 79 INVHA I.S.610 - 79 Sealed Insulating Glass Units ASTM E774 = 81 4 n other exhaust u -- ( ) F or la st systems exhausting air from the building to the cetside shall be provided with backdraft dampers or automatic dampers to prevent air Ieakage.. • r \e (5) -Masonry' and. factory -built -fireplaces hall have -the following: (A) Tight fitting closeable metal or glass doors covering -the entire opening of the firebox (this requirement nay he omitted if such doors would interfere with devices permanently installed in the fireplace which are designed to increase the circulation of heat); (B) A combustion air intake to draw air from the outride of the building.directly into the firebox, which is at least six square inches in area and is equipped with a readily accessible, operable, and tight fitting deeper; and (C) Tight fitting flue damper with a readily accessible control. Cent i:cons burning pilot lights and the ceelir:g a firebox jec et, .':en that indoor sIJe of t1'e building, are prohibited. 7arriers. Tn Cli: ,te Zonas 1, 14, and 16 s1,c•_t in F/gore 2 5i;, a `_ruler •tall .e festelled en the cc`ditic,;,d space stile of all .e Lieu in all extettLr walls, urn:nt.d attire, cad vv:..:d crawl • e to pt emnt in. cJ:•-r.'rn form inedencatton. nse of indoor air for air is vented to the out - .r:', .h71l .. C-.'ta Jrt.ri, is rf.,I 1: d, rd ..-t.'.-t,' 'cr 10 of t',- Ft. tc M, h-, teal Cot, ( ltle 24, Fart a). • to try (g) (h) (1) (1) tfon ing F vi nrct Sizing. Note --1 ,1,,d ii-ir.efied rt,trole,m gds central furnaces shall be sired to eeet at ]east one of the following requirements: (A) (B) The total output heating capacity of furnaces shall. be-less.than 45,000 Btu/hr;-or in the building Output beating capacity shall be less -than 1.3 times the sum of the design heat loss ,rate for the heating zone being serviced by the furnace and 10 Btu per hour per square foot of con- ditioned floor area in the zone; or (C) Seasonal efficiency shall exceed 7) percent by one. percent for every 7,000 Btu/hr the output heating capacity exceeds either the building design heat loss rate or 45,000 Btu/hr, whichever is greater. The fttrnace output heating capacity shall be determined using the ;c,^th-d described in the Department of Energy test procedures for eoesures of energy consumption in 42 Federal Register 20147-20181 (}fay 10, 1973). r (2) :'.'-,tfr'g and ccoling equipment shall he sized in accordance with the latl:ting design heat loss rate and heat gain rate, using a method set forth by the Executive Director, based on the 1979 ASHRAE m-e1.,.ok and Product Directory, Equipment Volume, 1980 Systems nen,-se and 1921 Fvodamentals Volume. Indorr design dry bulb air temperatures shall be 70°F for heating and 78°F for cooling. Outdoor design air temperatures- shall be three 11sred in the 1 percent or 0.2 percent Winter Dry Bulb column fur heating and the 2-1/2 percent or 0.5 percent Summer Dry Bulb and Vet^:rib columns for cooling, based on whether the percentages are percent -"of -season or percent -of -year respectively in ASHRAE put] cattoes: Recolmended Outdoor Design Temperatures, Northern California, 1977, and Recommended Outdoor Design Temperatures, `Thuthern California, 1972. Setback Thermostats. Thermostatically controlled systems, except electric heat pumps, shall have an with a clock mechanism which the building occupant to autc.matically set back the thermostat set poi periods within 24 hours. - (3) Water FeAting System Insulation. (1) heating or cooling automatic thermostat can manually program' nts for at least 2 Sto,age type water heaters and storage and backup tanks for solar rater heating systems shall be externally wrapped with insulation having an installed thermal resistance of R_l2 or greater (2) Piping in unconditioned space leading to and from water heaters shall he insulated with an installed thermal resistance of R-3 or greater for the five' feet of pipe closest to the water heater,' or whatever starter Iength is in unconditioned' space. (j) Pipe Insulation. Steam and steam -condensate return -piping and recircel•;t =g !rt water piping in attics, garages,. crawl spaces, or unheated spaces other than between floors or In interior walls shall be insulatr_d to provide maximum loss of not more than 50 Btu/hour per -linear foot for piping up to and including 2 inch nominal diameter and 100 Btu/hour per linear foot for larger sizes. - (k) Swimming Fool neat leg. (1) (m) (1) Any new or replacement los il-fueled swimming pool heater a residential occupancy shall be equipped with all • following: (A) An ON --OFF switch mounted on the outside of the heater for easy access to allow shutting- off 'the operation of the' heater without adjusting the thermostat setting and to allow restarting -without relighting the pilot light. (B) A perranent weatherproof 'plate or card, easily readable giving instruction for the energy efficient operation of the swimming pool and for the proper care of swimming pool water when'a swimming pool cover is used. system in. of the (C) A length of plumbing (36•' minimum) between the filter and the. fossil fuel heater to allow for -the future addition of solar heating, equipment. (2) Any new or replacement fossil -fueled swimming pool heater shall have - 'a thermal efficiency of at least 75 percent when tested in accor- dance with ANSI Z21.56-1979 and shall be so identified on 'the plans and the heater. . (3) Outdoor pools equipped with a fossil fuel or electric heater shall also be equipped with a pool cover. ' (4) Time clocks shall be installed on any new or replacement pool circu- lation pump not already so equipped so that the pump can be set to run in the off-peak electric demand period (unless required ' to operate an active' solar pool heating system) and for the minimum time necessary to maintain the water in a clear and sanitary condi- tion in keeping with applicable 'public health standards. Where public health standards require 24-hour' operation, time clocks'shall __not be:required.., - (5) All new pools .shall be equipped with directional inlets which pro- -vide for adequate mixing of the pool water. , Cas Cooking Appliances. Cas -fired household cooking appliances with continuously burning pilots, except those designed to hurn only liquefied petroleum gases and those which do not have an electrical' line voltage supply connection and have only or,e continuous burning pilot light consuming less. than 150 British thermal units per hour, shall not be . installed in a building of occupancy R. Lighting.J- Lamps used in luein.tdres for Sathroees shall bane an efficacy of not Luminaires which are the only lighting cc: si'ered £cncral lighting. lighting visual tasks'or decorative effect arc exe e•c-pt lighting includes In-air:dean that fic task .area such as a kitchrn-counter bethrcea ::irrur. • general lighting in kitchcns'and less than 75 lumens' per watt. n a kitchen or bathroom will be to be esed only for specific opt from this requirement. Such are neeet to light only a cond- or sick, a dining table, or a CCE: ;utlerity citrd: Ft -11c Ptrourr.s Cc.'e, Section 2502. Fel:er rte•: P,._,,ic il`,r.rs Cr>'n, c(-ct cn 21.-402. Mandatory Measures Checklist: Residential fJF. R•: NOTE: Lewrise residohlial buildings subject to the Standards must contain these measures regardless of the ccrp5anco approach used, Hems marked with an astorisk (')may bo superseded by more stringent compliance requirements listed on the Certificate of Compliance. ;When this checklist is incorporated into the permitdccumens, the features noted shall be considered by all parties as binding minimum component performance specifications for the • mandatory measures whether they are shown elsewhere in the docurhents or on this checklist only, , `• • RECENED - - MAY 2 0 1993 PLANNING DEPT. w 0 • t-- 0 crcr F- 1- 0 -J LEGAL- DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY hi 611 . CHECKED BY,» - APPROVED BY • DATE 975yets ..,s........., SHEET NO. SHEET S. • DESCRIPTION DESIGNER ENFORCEMENT t • Building Envelope Measures *,§150(a): lAinirrum R-19 ceirng insu!a'.n ,5150(b): Leese fill intdation manufacturer's labeled fl -Value.; * §150(c): i.! 7imum-R-13 waft irnsu!aton in framed wails (does not appy to' exterior, mass * §1!0(d): ;' nimum R-13 rein;ecf f -er insolation in framed floors; minimum P-8 in concrete §' X1"1`' Fab edge insulation - water absorption rata no greater than 0.3%, water vapor o'ea:ai f,tn 2 0 perm/Inch. - . ' §118- Insulation specled or installed meets d California Energy Commission quary standards... Indicate type and form. . " .5116-17: Fenestration Products, Exterior Doors a:,d Infiltrab&NExfiltration Controls . - a. Doors acd windows between conditioned and unconditioned spaces designed to „ 'b. Manufactured lenestration products hate label with certified U -value, and infiltration e. Exterior doors and windows weatierstripped; alt joints and penetrations caulked § 15C(g): Vapor barriers mandatory in Climate Zones 14 and 16 only.. -' " §150(f): Special infiltration barrier installed to'ramp?y with §151 meets Commission quality 51 S0(e): Installation of Fireplaces, Decorative Gas A.ppharces and Ga; Logs "..1. Masonry and factory -built freplaars hero: ' a. Closeable meal or glass door -' ,b. Outside air intake with damper and control • c. flue damper and control' 2. No continuous burning gas pilot, a"owed, Space Conditioning, Water Heating and Plumbing System Measures §110.13:' HVAC equipment, water heaters, showeTheads and faucets certified by the §150(:): Setback Thermostat on all app! b!e heating systems. §150(1): Pipe and Tank Insulaferi ' - '• 1. indirect hot water tanks (e.g., unfired storage tanks or backup solar hot water fan's - - blanket (R-12 or greater) or combined interior/exterior insu atlgn (R-16 or greater). ' 2. First 5 feet of pipes closest to water heater tank, tee-rodraaa5ng systems, insulated 3. All buried cr eiposed piping insulated in rec:vcula(ng sections of hot water system. .. 4 Cooling system piping below 55°F insulated. r •. 5. Piping insulated bc4aeen heating source and indirect hot water lank. ' §150(m) Ducts 'and Fans" 1.• Ducts tonstnrcted, ktstaned and scaled to comply wish UMC Sections 1002 and 1004; to a minimum installed value of P-4 2 cr ducs enclosed entirely within cord tinned 2. Exhaust an systems have backdraft or actamakc dampers- 3 Gratify ventilating systems serving conditioned space have tither 2Utema':c Or read:ry manually cperatrd Ca.T,pers.. , §114 Poet and Spa Hsc@ng Systems and Equip tient - 1, System iseertrid with 76% Thermal erldenci,nn-dfswitch, weat`erprin cp<rat;ngin electric' resistnii heating and no pilot fight. 2. Sy':misirst:^:dwiith: - - a 'Atleast 36' p- tetwcenfilter <ndha erkrfut„rescLY _fm' ' ' h.'Csvv.:,;out:'.,,.p o;cbrcr:di:erSP3 ,' . ' 1, P-:), nit,;,11'56.-,.....:N::.,i_2.^^• EG:_'1:`',nc'.-`ti.,r,n-,.. ti:• (i -:a. d(d f'. .r,'b :cane, e..a !'.t.- .t,-9i'n t'• - v' rt. .,.b.ni: u. p'' -•Lehi (.T" :'t �t-, ,...::IC : ,'',.7 in; F:',''. wit !l pJ ' c''i I t,:.,i,1g i,tt';s,nr3 .: ',,. V:7'.. _,; .Y Lift::: 1,)t±.:.".-,,.'1; _ t.- • Walls). raised reefs Ira: err -;ion rate no " ' limit air leakage. cettEcatcn • and sealed. ' standards: ' • ' - Commission. ' s) have insulation (R 4 o7 greater). • - - • ' . duos insulated saace. - aces:'!'tie, tw .;crs,no , . - •---_ Fs, kat , ' -_.-_ ,. .. _, _ SLAZ' INS A RI ALyS I S UNIT ORIENTATION SINGLE DOUBLE SHADING DEVICE - ' NORTH ' EAST SOUTH WEST SKYLIGHT UNIT: NORTH''' - EAST. SOUTH WEST, SKYLIGHT am.--...,... - • { NOTE: THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CONSERVATION-_ STANDARDS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND THE DESIGNS, DRAWINGS; AND- CALCULATIONS .COiVPLY - SUBSTANTIALI_Y WITH THESE STANDARDS ` RECENED - - MAY 2 0 1993 PLANNING DEPT. w 0 • t-- 0 crcr F- 1- 0 -J LEGAL- DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY hi 611 . CHECKED BY,» - APPROVED BY • DATE 975yets ..,s........., SHEET NO. SHEET S.