Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/25/94-72,4--/-1--J 30- 9V- -5749,2r0 (2-E-41051 9 V- 1.:* "A day of worry is more exhausting than a week of work." - Sir John Lubbock AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, October 25, 1994 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. MAYOR Robert Benz MAYOR PRO TEM John Bowler COUNCIL MEMBERS Sam Y. Edgerton Julie Oakes J. R. Reviczky CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Stephen R. Burrell CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PROCLAMATIONS: BUCKLE UP FOR LIFE CHALLENGE 1994-95 JAZZ -WEST COAST „ October 27 - 30,1994 7 tr Where there is no vision the people perish HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. , Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or orally. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet compilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agenda is developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allotted. 1111 In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, ifyou need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204. Please provide enough time to enable us to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. GLOSSARY Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law -or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager... The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. PRESENTATIONS: rrxrrr...rr.,rx•,o-xo-axw, ,c. }...,wo, .c ti a. xxua... ya r x•t xua xorrrrx,.<:,ri<, m+xa nx :r»wv Presentation of 1993 Pedestrian Safety Award from the Automobile Club of Southern California A.A.A. to Police Chief '> ' Val Straser. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited by law from taking.immediate action on any Public Participation unagendized item unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency nature. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1) Letter from Rosamond Fogg dated October 17, 1994 regarding the extension of time on the Macpherson Oil Lease. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. 2 (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on October 4, 1994; and, 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on October 11, 1994. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the September 1994 financial reports: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to approve request from Arts Hermosa of a street closure for Pier Avenue from Valley Drive west to the Strand from 4:00pm, December 31, 1994 to 2:00am, January 1 1995 for "First Ni ht" event. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated October 17, 1994. (f) Recommendation to adopt resolution) approving guidelines for regulating the consumption of alcohol on City property. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated October 18, 1994. Recommendation to receive and file report on "Emergency Generator Capability in Local Grocery Stores with Incentive Program to Provider" and propose an incentive program to generator provider. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated October 13, 1994. (g) Recommendation to approve City Council meeting schedule for 1995. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 11, 1994. Recommendation to approve street closure of Pier Avenue between Beach Drive and The Strand on November 27th and December 4th, 11th & 18th to hold open air "jazz concerts" sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce and allow retail merchants on lower Pier Avenue to display goods on the sidewalk area outside their businesses during these events, and approve the bagging of parking meters in the Downtown Business District from November 21st through December 26th to provide 2 hour free parking during the holiday season. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated October 18, 1994. 3 0) Recommendation to(dopt a resolutioto amend the Coastal Land Use Plant incorporating the modifications of the Coastal Commission and approve the downtown parking utilization survey. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 20, 1994. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. a. (ORDINANCE NO. 94-111)- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION PREVENTION CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT REQUIREMENTS." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 18, 1994. b. (ORDINANCE NO. 94-111)- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF 'HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OFFENSES - MISCELLANEOUS, SECTION 21-23 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON STREETS, PLAYGROUNDS OR PLACES OPEN TO THE PUBLIC." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 18, 1994. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE 17' GARAGE SETBACK, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (Continued from meeting of October 11, 1994) Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 27, 1994. 5. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION AND METHOD OF DETERMINATION FOR GRADE FOR THE 0 l PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (Continued from meeting of October 11, 1994) Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 29, 1994. 4 ; MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. SOUTH PARK - APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated October 17, 1994. 7. MUNICIPAL PIER SCHEMATIC DESIGN. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated October 17, 1994. 8. CONSIDERATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH WRIT OF MANDATE - CLARK V. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. Oral Report from City Attorney Charles Vose. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. County Library Funding Restoration to 1992-93 Levels. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 20, 1994. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. Vacancies - Boards and Commission Appointment - Civil Service Board - Expiration of one term Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 20, 1994. b. Beach Cities Toy Drive. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 18, 1994. 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT srRD: 10 -q} $INUTEB OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TEE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on October 25, 1994, at the hour of 7:01 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz Absent: None PROCLAMATION: BUCKLE UP FOR LIFE CHALLENGE - 1994-95 Mayor Benz read the proclamation, declared the remaining holiday months of 1994 and all of 1995 as the Buckle up for Life Challenge and encouraged citizens to use their seat belts and child safety seats each an every time they travel in a motor vehicle. JAZZ WEST COAST - October 27 - 30, 1994 Mayor Benz read the proclamation, said the Jess West Coast event will take place at the Holiday Inn Crowne Plaza in Redondo Beach from October 27 through 30, 1994 and urged all residents to take time to enjoy this celebration. PRESENTATIONS: Presentation of 1993 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AWARD from the Automobile Club of Southern California A.A.A. to Police Chief Val Straser. ANNOUNCEMENT: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited by law from taking immediate action on any Public Participation unagendized item unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency nature. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens may also speak: (1) (2) during Consent Calendar Hearings; with the Mayor's consent, appearing under Municipal consideration or Public during discussion of items Matters; and, City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8645 • (3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments " . Citizens with comments regarding City management of departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: CM /2 • At 7P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting with item 4. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None 1) C . unc i i ter th Letter from Rosamond Fogg. dated October 17, 1994 regarding the extension of time on the Macpherson Oil Lease. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Rosamond Foaq - 610 Sixth Street, spoke to her letter " C� ` L.40.0`4 /3- • • Actions To receive and file. Motion e , second 44-0t-‘5,- naio = of ' 1. CONSENT CALENDAR The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8646 /1*6,,, 4.(2-3 )- • • • • Council member requests to remove items from the consent calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) Public comments on the Consent Calendar. Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (j), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (a) Motion?', second So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on October 4, 1994; and, 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on October 11. 1994. Action: To approve the minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of October 4, 1994 and the Regular Meeting of October 11, 1994 as ******** (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTRAR AND TO APPROVE THE CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN WARRANTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the check registrar as presented. (C) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE SEPTEMBER 1994 FINANCIAL REPORTS: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8647 (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. ActioM: To receive and file the September, 1994 Financial Reports as presented. 9110)-P4) (e) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE REQUEST FROM ARTS HERMOSA OF !! STREET CLOSURE FOR PIER AVENUE FROM VALLEY DRIVE WEST TO THE STRAND FROM 4:00 P.M., DECEMBER 31, 1994 TO 2:00 A.M., JANUARY 1, 1995 FOR "FIRST NIGHT" EVENT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Maryjoy dated October 17, 1994. 'ck '-7( 7"/71:c P o : p11 (-W To approve the Downtown Business Area (� Enhancement District Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to: ) approve the street closure of Pier Avenue, from V lley Drive west to the Strand, to vehicular Caffic from 4:00 P.M. on Saturday, December 31, 1994 to 2:00 A.M. on Sunday, January 1, 1995, as requested by Arts Hermosa, subject to the conditions required of Arts Hermosa listed in the analysis of: a) $2 million dollars of comprehensive and general liability insurance; b) indemnify the City; c) cost of Police Officers assigned by Chief of Police to ensure event safety and traffic control; d) provision of adequate portable toilets and trash receptacles; e) sole responsibility for event management; f) post temporary "no parking" signs; and, g) abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by the City; 2) approve an allocation of $5,000 from the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission for the event; and, 3) approve the fee waivers as listed in the analysis of: a) Civic Theater rental fees/damage deposits (estimated at $3,000); b) meter buy-out fees ($15.50 per meter per day); c) non-profit special event fees ($1.50 per participant); and, d) sign review fee ($86.75 for wall mural at Video Archives). City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8648 • • • (f) RECOMMENDATION TO 'ADOPT RESOLUTIONEAPPROVING GUIDELINES FOR REGULATING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL ON CITY PROPERTY. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated October 18, 1994. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt .tiResolution No. 94-5708; entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF—THE-CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 21-23 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL AT PUBLIC OUTDOOR FACILITIES SUBJECT TO A PERMIT.", as amended 5"( Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote (g) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT ON "EMERGENCY GENERATOR CAPABILITY IN LOCAL GROCERY STORES WITH INCENTIVE PROGRAM TO PROVIDER" AND PROPOSE AN INCENTIVE PROGRAM TO GENERATOR PROVIDER. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated October 13, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) receive and file the report; City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8649 • • • 2) propose incentive program to generator provider; and, 3) direct staff to implement the incentive program. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 1995. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 11, 1994. �D 4 Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the City Council meeting schedule for 1995 for the second Tuesday of each month and the fourth Tuesday of each month except for August and December (one meeting only in these two months). (i) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE STREET CLOSURE OF PIER AVENUE BETWEEN BEACH DRIVE AND THE STRAND ON NOVEMBER 27TH AND DECEMBER 4TH, 11TH 6 18TH TO HOLD OPEN AIR "JAZZ CONCERTS" SPONSORED BY THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND ALLOW RETAIL MERCHANTS ON LOWER PIER AVENUE TO DISPLAY GOODS ON THE SIDEWALK AREA OUTSIDE THEIR BUSINESSES DURING THESE EVENTS, AND APPROVE THE BAGGING OF PARKING METERS IN THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT FROM NOVEMBER 21ST THROUGH DECEMBER 26TH TO PROVIDE 2 HOUR FREE PARKING DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated October 18, 1994. Action: To approve the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to: 1) approve the request from the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce to hold open air "Jazz Concerts" on Pier Avenue between Beach Drive and The Strand on the following dates: Sunday, November 27; Sunday, December 4; Sunday, December 11; and Sunday, December 18, 1994, closing that section of Pier Avenue from vehicular traffic from 11:00 A.M. until 5:00 P.M.; 2) allow retail merchants on lower Pier Avenue to display goods on the sidewalk area outside their businesses, with the stipulation that a minimum of 36 inches remain clear for pedestrian traffic; and, City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8650 • • • 3) approve the bagging of parking meters in the downtown area in order to offer two (2) hours of free parking to shoppers between November 21 and December 26, 1994, (j) RECOMMENDATION TO ADO A-RESOLUTION+TO AMEND THE COASTAL LAND USE PLAN, INCORPORATING THE MODIFICATIONS OF THE COASTAL COMMISSION AND APPROVE THE DOWNTOWN PARKING UTILISATION SURVEY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 20, 1994. Action: To approve the_staff recommendation to: 1) adopt,Resolution No._94-570,\ entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE POLICIES OF THE CITY'S CERTIFIED COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IN REGARD TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE DOWNTOWN, AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION 94-5657, AND AS MODIFIED BY THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION."; AND, 2) approve the downtown parking utilization survey (prepared by IBI Consultants) by minute order, in order to comply with the required finding of 1(c) of the amended Land Use Plan, with the survey showing: a) Area I (downtown area west of Manhattan Avenue) i) off-street private parking of 310 spaces utilized at: • 45% at 10:00 A.M.; • 50% at 12:30 P.M.; • 53% at 2:00 P.M.; and, • 51% at 4:00 P.M. ii) off-street public parking of 318 spaces utilized at: • 35% at 10:00 A.M.; • 65% at 12:30 P.M. • 70% at 2:00 P.M.; and, • 64% at 4:00 P.M. iii) on -street metered parking of 427 spaces utilized at: • 68% at 10:00 P.M.; • 89% at 12:30 P.M.; • 85% at 2:00 P.M.; and, • 85% at 4:00 P.M. iv) total parking of 1055 spaces for Area I utilized at: • 52% at 10:00 A.M.; City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8651 • 70% at 12:30 P.M.; • 73% at 2:00 P.M.; and, • 71% at 4:00 P.M. b) Area II (Pier Avenue between Valley Drive an Manhattan Avenue) i) off-street private parking of 226 spaces utilized at: • 19% at 10:00 A.M.; • 26% at 12:30 P.M.; • 26% at 2:00 P.M.; and, • 32% at 4:00 P.M. ii) off-street public parking - none iii) on -street metered parking of 137 spaces utilized at: • 55% at 10:00 A.M.; • 76% at 12:30 P.M.; • 80% at 2:00 P.M.; and, • 69% at 4:00 P.M. iv) total parking of 363 spaces for Area II utilized at: • 33% at 10:00 A.M.; • 48% at 12:30 P.M.; • 46% at 2:00 P.M.; and, • 46% at 4:00 P.M. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) -ORDINANCE NO. -94-1113 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION PREVENTION CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT REQUIREMENTS." Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 18, 1994. Action: To adopt'Ordina�nae No._94-11.13. Motion��„ second AYES: Bowler, Oakes, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None b. ORDINANCE -NO -941119 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OFFENSES - MISCELLANEOUS, SECTION 21-23 OF THE City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8652 • • • HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON STREETS, PLAYGROUNDS OR PLACES OPEN TO THE PUBLIC." Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 18, 1994. Action: To adopt •Or`dinance-No.-94-11 Motion , second`. AYES: Bowler, Oakes, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1( ), ( ), ( ), and ( ) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEAARIN6S 4. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE 17' GARAGE SETBACK, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, with Ordinance for? ( introduction [(Continued from meeting of L October 11, 1994) Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 27, 1994. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. ] oJen1 TheCpublic hearing opened at 7:5(7 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: /67 /\/c2 ot\-) ) City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8653 • The public hearing closed at 7: -PP P.M. _fl�a Action: To introduce Ordinance No._94-1 .` Motion A. -k,, second ��r-�j( . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No -'N C94 :1730 entitled, 'SAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA ( BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND SECTION 1157(C) IN REGARD TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING GARAGES AND PARKING STALLS TO MEASURE SAID SETBACK FROM THE EDGE OF THE NEAREST PUBLIC SIDEWALK OR STREET IMPROVEMENT RATHER THAN U THE PROPERTY LINE AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motionn , second�� U •NOES: Bowler, Edgerton, None Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz 5. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION AND METHOD OF DETERMINATION FOR GRADE FO THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (Continued from meeting of October 11, 1994) Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 29, 1994. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Thep� u bl c hearing /opened at 8 :)C7 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: - . , dr ,--,2--oril tr' ---5..0 ) -) ----,...,. 6- 'e--- e --- 0_614A,-,) zo, ----, L. ) 2__..... ,,.,.____e_ _:-_-_ (<=. , a.) c7 --) ' Ci'tp Council 14inutes`1-25-94 Page 8654 • • y A v ) -� The public hearing closed at 4:/V P.M. Action: To introduce_Ordinance`Mo: 94=111 Motion , second' '" : The—motion carried by a unanimous vote. kei 7inal Action: To waive further reading of<Ordinance-No: ;94=111—entitled, HAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY -OF' HERMOSA BEACH. CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 208, IN REGARD TO DEFINITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING BUILDING HEIGHT AND GRADE AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION.„ Motion , second AYES: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. SOUTH PARK - APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated October 17, 1994. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 9 :3`1 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: (3„,pc,— AA„--6---t=t" -----/ ,--7-- v -.---_-2 6---7 ,..-29 —7 — • City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8655 Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at : P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve the Construction Documents for the South Park Project prepared by J.F. Davidson & Associates, Inc. consisting of: a) demolition and removal; b) earthwork and grading; c) soil import; d) soil preparation; e) construction of main parking lot; f) construction of the deceleration lane on Valley Drive; installation construction construction installation installation installation g) h) i) j) k) 1) m) n) o) p) at an estimated cost of $296,576.44 and a completion date estimated for September 4, 1995; and, 2) direct staff to advertise and open competitive bids for the construction of Phase I of the South Park Project. Motion second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. of concrete walkways; of retaining walls; of the asphalt play court; of the irrigation system; of security lighting conduit; of drinking fountains, bike racks and trash containers; hydroseeding of turf areas; hydroseeding of slope areas; planting of 1 and 5 gallon shrubs; and, planting of 15 gallon and 24 box trees, ke-er 7. MUNICIPAL PIER SCHEMATIC DESIGN. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated October 17, 1994. City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8656 Assistant City Manager Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. a Public participation opened at I:� P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: ) '' l'2,eip jY;L2 ).e..)- ..) -----i---.... I_ „, • Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public participation closed at : P.M. • Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve the schematic design for the Pier presented by Kirkpatrick Associates; 2) provide Council recommendations of: a) XXX 3) accept Kirkpatrick Associates work as complete; 4) direct staff to prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) for final design, construction documents and construction management; and, 5) direct staff to search for sources to fund future phases of the project. Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8657 • • • 8. CONSIDERATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH WRIT OF MANDATE - CLARK V. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. Oral Report from City Attorney Charles Vose. City Attorney Vose presented his report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at : P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public participation closed at : P.M. Action: To Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the report. Motion , second The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of. City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8658 • • 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. County Levels. Burrell Library Funding Restoration to 1992-93 Memorandum from City Manager Stephen dated October 20, 1994. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report responded to Council questions. and Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct staff to fully develop the entire package to form a City operated Library, including the necessary steps to withdraw from the Los Angeles County Library System, and refrain from providing notice of intent to withdraw until December, 1995. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. Vacancies - Boards and Commission Appointment - Civil Service Board - Expiration of one term. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 20, 1994. City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. • Action:'o appoint Roy G. McNally to the Civil Service Board for a four-year term ending July 15, 1998. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Action: To re -appoint John Wisdom to the Civil Service Board for a four-year term ending July 15, 1998. City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8659 • Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting 'vote of b. Beach Cities Toy Drive. Manager,Stephen Burrell dated City MaBurrell presented respond:. o Council questions. Memorandum from City October 18, 1994. the staff report and Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the placement of a bin in the City Hall parking lot from November 1 through December 25, 1994 for the collection . of toys by the BeacCities Toy Drive. 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. • efi u .4,01 , ,1 71//tt'd /) City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8660 ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, October 25, 1994 at the hour of 10: to P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, November 8, 1994 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. • • Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 10-25-94 Page 8661 ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, October 25, 1994 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 7:14 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Carol Baker, Daily Breeze ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT PROCLAMATIONS: BUCKLE UP FOR LIFE CHALLENGE 1994-95 JAZZ WEST COAST October 27 - 30, 1994 PRESENTATIONS: Bill Sauber of the Manhattan Beach AAA presentation of 1993 Pedestrian Safety Award from the Automobile Club of Southern California A.A.A. to Police Chief Val Straser. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Betty Ryan: Asked Council to define zoning code regarding surrounding lot pattern and surrounding lot area. Staff to return with a report clarifying surrounding lot pattern and surrounding lot area. Chris Smith: Commented on oil project. Pat Davis; Representing Macpherson Oil: Presented renderings of project site upon completion. Karen Johnson: Said a prayer. Rosamond Fogg: Showed renderings of project site with drilling rig in place and stated that a service rig could be placed on the site for 90 days at a time. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1) Letter from Rosamond Fogg dated October 17, 1994 regarding the extension of time on the Macpherson Oil Lease. Rosamond Fogg: Spoke to her letter stating that legal opinion from city attorney stated that litigation was forced delay, lease says litigation is not a forced delay. JB/RB MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE, SO ORDERED. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on October 4, 1994; and, 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on October 11, 1994. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the September 1994 financial reports: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to approve request from Arts Hermosa of a street closure for Pier Avenue from Valley Drive west to the Strand from 4:00pm, December 31, 1994 to 2:00am, January 1, 1995 for "First Night" event. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated October 17, 1994. PULLED BY JO Dragana Bajalovic from Arts Hermosa provided an update on the event. JR/JO MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECT STAFF SUBMIT MEMO TO COUNCIL CLOSER TO THE EVENT DATE OUTLINING THE FINAL PLANS. 5-0 2 (f) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving guidelines for regulating the consumption of alcohol on City property. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated October 18, 1994. PULLED BY JB QUESTIONED STAFF AS TO WHETHER THE CITY WOULD REQUIRE DOCUMENTATION OF INDEMNIFICATION OF THE CITY FROM NON -PROFITS AND IF THE INSURANCE WOULD INCLUDE THIRD PARTY INDEMNIFICATION OF THE CITY? STAFF WILL HAVE CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW THIRD PARTY INDEMNIFICATION ISSUE. JB/JR MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION. 5-0 (g) Recommendation to receive and file report on "Emergency Generator Capability in Local Grocery Stores with Incentive Program to Provider" and propose an incentive program to generator provider. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated October 13, 1994. (h) Recommendation to approve City Council meeting schedule for 1995. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 11, 1994. PULLED BY JR JR/JO MOTION TO APPROVE 1995 SCHEDULE. 5-0 (i) Recommendation to approve street closure of Pier Avenue between Beach Drive and The Strand on November 27th and December 4th, •11th & 18th to hold open air "jazz concerts" sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce and allow retail merchants on lower Pier Avenue to display goods on the sidewalk area outside their businesses during these events, and approve the bagging of parking meters in the Downtown Business District from November 21st through December 26th to provide 2 hour free parking during the holiday season. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated October 18, 1994. 3 (i) Recommendation to adopt a resolution to amend the Coastal Land Use Plan, incorporatinz the modifications of the Coastal Commission and approve the downtown parking utilization survey. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 20, 1994. PULLED BY JB CONGRATULATED STAFF FOR THEIR EFFORTS IN THIS MATTER. JB/JR MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION. 5-0 JB/RB MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON BALANCE OF CONSENT CALENDAR. 5-0 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. a. ORDINANCE NO. 94-1113 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION PREVENTION CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT REQUIREMENTS." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 18, 1994. SE/JR MOTION TO ADOPT. 5-0 b. ORDINANCE NO. 94-1119 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OFFENSES - MISCELLANEOUS, SECTION 21-23 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON STREETS, PLAYGROUNDS OR PLACES OPEN TO THE PUBLIC." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 18, 1994. JB/JR MOTION TO ADOPT 5-0 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE 17' GARAGE SETBACK, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (Continued from meeting of October 11, 1994) Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 27, 1994. Public Hearing Opened at 7:50 PM Public Hearing Closed at 7:50PM JO/RB MOTION TO INTRODUCE. 4-1 (SE -NO) RB/JB MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING. 5-0 JR/JO MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO RETURN BEFORE ORDINANCE IS EFFECTIVE WITH PRECISE LIST OF AREAS WITH/WITHOUT SIDEWALKS. 5-0 5. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION AND METHOD OF DETERMINATION FOR GRADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. (Continued from meeting of October 11, 1994) Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 29, 1994. Public Hearing opened 8:08 PM Dean Nota: Feels ordinance is ambiguous stating that no lot in the city is evenly sloped Feels height should be tied to public improvements. Public Hearing closed 8:16 PM JO/ SE MOTION TO SEND BACK TO STAFF TO AMEND SECTION 1, PARA 3 "UNUSUAL LOTS WITH EXTREME CONVEX" BY DEVELOPING A CALCULATION TO DEFINE THIS STATEMENT. 5-0 5 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. SOUTH PARK- APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated October 17, 1994. AMEND PHASE 2 TO CORRECT THE OMISSION OF LIGHTING. Parker Herriott: Questioned cost of park. COUNCIL DIRECTED THAT, IF PHASE 1 COMES IN UNDER BUDGET, THEY BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO DECIDE WHAT ASPECTS OF PHASE 2 WILL BE INCLUDED IN PHASE 1. SE/JR MOTION TO APPROVE. 5-0 7. MUNICIPAL PIER SCHEMATIC DESIGN. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated October 17, 1994. Grant Kirkpatrick; Kirkpatrick Associations: Made presentation to Council of schematic design. WITH REGARD TO THE LIFEGUARD STATION REMODEL, COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO PREPARE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE LIFEGUARD STATION IS SEPARATED OUT FROM THE REST OF THE PIER TO ALLOW AWARD TO SEPARATE COMPANIES AT DIFFERENT TIMES WITHOUT REWRITING CONSTRUCTION DOCS. Parker Herriott: Questioned the source offunding and the safety of the fishing platforms. JB/SE MOTION TO APPROVE THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN. 5-0 8. CONSIDERATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH WRIT OF MANDATE - CLARK V. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. Oral Report from City Attorney Charles Vose. JB/J111. OTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO SET PUBLIC HEARING. 3-2 (SE/RB ABSTAINING) 6 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. County Library Funding Restoration to 1992-93 Levels. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 20, 1994. JR/JB MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO FULLY DEVELOP THE ENTIRE PACKAGE TO FORM A CITY LIBRARY AND REFRAIN FROM PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO WITHDRAW UNTIL DECEMBER, 1995. 5-0 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. Vacancies - Boards and Commission Appointment - Civil Service Board - Expiration of one term Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 20, 1994. JB/JR MOTION TO SET UP INTERVIEWS FOR 11/8/94 AT 6:30PM. 5-0 b. Beach Cities Toy Drive. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 18, 1994. SE/JR MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. 5-0 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL NONE CITIZEN COMMENTS Parker Herriott: Attempted to question a council member regarding an issue of a personal nature. Both the Mayor and City Attorney informed him that this issue was not within the jurisdiction of the City Council. Pat Davis: Clarified misinformation regarding derricks stating that the drilling rig would be in place for three years or less and a service rig, which is not owned by Macpherson but rather is rented by the day, is not left on the site for any length of time, but only as long as needed JB/JR ADJOURNMENT: 10:08 PM 7 .-. „m -ori - • 72 • • I 17j, r RIEHMAN ��!1,,,, Marketing Advertising Public Relations October 13, 1994 Mr. Michael Flaherty Public Works Director City of Hermosa Beach Dear Michael, I didn't get the.chance to express our sincere thanks for your support of our volunteer tree care efforts in Hermosa Beach. The attention and commitment of you and your staff is much appreciated. As you are aware, four trees near 30th Street were vandalized recently, having their support stakes broken off at the base. Less than 24 hours after my call to your office, a Public Works staff member was dispatched to re -stake the trees and fully remedy the problem. No additional vandalism has occurred since this incident, due in large measure to your quick response. Thank you also for your recent prompt repairs to the utility closet door at Valley Park, where we store our irrigation equipment. I believe that the moisture from adjacent sprinklers and restrooms is the reason for the door and latch sticking — a facilities issue unrelated to your maintenance commit- ment. I will try some WD -40 on the latch and give you a report this week. Thank you again. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Chris Howell Copies to: Parks and Recreation Commissioners City Councilmembers 1623 Aviation Boulevard, Suite B Redondo Beach, California 90278 (310) 374-1830 • FAX: (310) 374-2280 Hermosa Beach City Council Valley Blvd. Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254 �ulrd, /o a.s-9/ Parker Herriott 224 24th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 October 25, 1994 Dear City Councilmembers, City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk, etc. RE: City Councilmember John L. Bowler's alleged arrest in Cleveland, Ohio approximately twenty five years ago: Mr. Bowler I have in the past asked you questions about your alleged arrest in Cleveland, Ohio. You have remained silent though about your alleged arrest when I tried to get you to answer certain questions in the City Council Chambers. Why? The citizens of Hermosa Beach have a right to know what you were allegedly arrested for and the disposition of the charge or charges. Please give the dates of the alleged arrest or arrests and the dates of the disposition of the charge or charges. Were you arrested on a felony or felonies or misdemeanors? I wish you would explain what happened in Cleveland, Ohio approximately twenty five years ago, regarding your arrest. Recently an account of the alleged arrest appeared in the Easy Reader, a local newspaper. The other account of your alleged arrest appeared in the Easy Reader right after your election as a City Councilman in Hermosa Beach, the office you still hold now. Your alleged arrest was not known by most of the voters who voted for you, and I doubt you would have received as many votes that you did if the voters knew of you alleged arrest or arrests. Why did the information about your arrest come out after the election? Your answers will be helpful in determining if you are suitable for holding your present office as city councilman. Your answers will have a bearing on your trustworthiness as a councilman. So it is imperative that you tell the truth. Respectfully, ,ri7ei.t.4 Parker R. Herriott .. ........ .....• RIEHMAN �,Yi1sse4_, Marketing Advertising Public Relations October 13, 1994 Ms. Mary Rooney Mr. John Newell Community Resources Department City of Hermosa Beach fo - .s-qy Dear Mary and John, On behalf of volunteers taking part in the October 1 Greenbelt clean-up and tree care, I'd like to thank you both for your work in organizing this event. Your interest and commitment are much valued and appreciated. Over ten volunteers took part in the day's work, rebuilding watering basins and giving a deep soak- ing to about 25 trees and cleaning up refuse from about ten blocks of Greenbelt. Since we are only able to use one hose at this site, this was an appropriate number of volunteers for our first city - sponsored event. We hope to have at least three hoses working in three different areas on November 5th and will give you a proposed schedule for that event within the next week. We are also data -basing the names of over 200 local volunteers who have taken part in past Greenbelt planting events for a possible recruitment mailer before our December event. Again, thank you for your support. Sincerely, 5 Alk Chris Howell Copies to: Parks and Recreation Commissioners City Councilmembers 1623 Aviation Boulevard, Suite 13 Redondo Beach, California 90278 (310) 374-1830• FAX: (310) 374-2280 f please define: SURROUNDING LOT PATTERN AND SURROUNDING AREA PLEASE DEFINE: AREA § 1224 APPENDIX A -ZONING § 1224 (e) The location of other existing easements. (f) Showing any and all improvements existing on the property in relation to the property lines and -the proposed division. • (g) Applicant shall agree to provide any necessary easements for the proposed parcel or parcels. (h) If necessary, the planning commission shall estab- lish the front of the lots and front setbacks. (i) Such other information as the building and plan- ning director determines is necessary for the planning commission to consider the proposed division, including topographic data in hillside areas. (2) Criteria. The planning commission shall find that: (a) The proposed lot split would not create lots smaller than a forty (40) foot width and having less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. (b) That the proposed lot, after being divided, fronts on a public street, not an alley. (c) That the proposed lot split shall in no way be detrimental to the surrounding lot pattern there- by tending_to_reduce property values in they s rounding—area. (d) That the size of the proposed lot is not smaller than the prevailing lot size in the' area in which it would be located. (e) That the granting of the lot split would result in the creation of a lot that would be of a size and configuration which would be applicable to the standards of development specified by this ordi- nance in the land use district in which it is located. (f) That the creation of the proposed lot would be in conformity with the intent and purpose of the comprehensive general plan for the City of Her- mosa Beach. Supp. No. 1240 541 NOTES TO CITY COUNCIL 10/25/94 BETTY RYAN 376-7988 INFORMATION RE PROPOSED LOT SUBDIVISION LOT 9, BLK 71, SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH 588 20TH ST. - 120.75 X 133 (16059.75 SQ. FT) NOTE: 20TH ST. ENCOMPASSES TWO SEPARATE TRACTS ORIGINAL CONFIGURED SUBDIVISION OF TRACT NO. 1868 WAS 24 LOTS 22 LOTS 40 X 100 EACH. (NORTH SIDE OF 20TH ST AND SOUTH SIDE OF 21 ST. ) 2 LOTS ON 21ST CLOSE TO VALLEY WERE WERE 55 X 100 AND 60 X 100.6 TRACT 1868 IS THE NORTH SIDE OF 20TH ST. CURRENT SIZE OF LOTS ARE SHOWN ON SKETCH 1 SOUTH SIDE OF 20TH ST, CONTAINING SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SKETCH 2. BORDERS ARE VALLEY DRIVE TO THE EAST, 18 TH TO THE SOUTH ( NOTICE THAT PRIVATE STREET WHICH IS 19TH ST . DOES NOT SHOW ON THIS TRACT MAP, THEREFORE SIZE OF LOTS WHICH APPEAR LAND LOCK ARE SHOWN AS SIZE BEFORE STREET DEDICATION ( APPROX. 30 FEET WIDE) THIS IS TRACT NO. 15546. see SKETCH 2 AND 2A AND 3 SKETCH 2A SHOWS 20TH STREET WEST OF VALLEY PARK AVE TO NON EXISTENT POWER STREET (WHICH WAS VACATED) AND SOUTH TO WHAT USED TO BE 17TH ST BUT NOW IS THE SCHOOL PROPERTY. SKETCH NO. 3 SHOWS TRACT NO 15546 SOUTH OF 18TH ST. TO VACATED 17TH STREET (SCHOOL SITE)'. PLEASE NOTE ORIGINAL LOT SIZE OF 17TH ST WERE ALL 25FT WIDE. SURROUNDING LOTS IN AREA (PHYSICALLY TOUCHING MY PROPERTY) EAST OF ME = 4320 SQ. FT.(40 FT FRONTAGE ) WEST OF ME (ON VALLEY PARK AVE = 6539.51 SQ. FT.) 3 LOTS TOUCH MY PARCEL SOUTH OF ME= ON 19TH ST. 4739 SQ. FT. 4739 SQ. FT. TOTAL OF FOUR (4) LARGER AND THREE (3) SMALLER THAN OUR PROPOSED LOTS. • NOTES TO'CITY COUNCIL 10/25/94 BETTY RYAN 376-7988 CONT WE PROPOSE THRI LOTS SIZED 5353.25 EACH. CURRENTLY ON 20TH ST; OUR SIDE; 4920 SQ. FT 4320 6539 6551 ACROSS THE STREET . 5337 SQ. FT. 5000 5500 5200 5500 5250 5250 5220 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 TWO LARGER, TWO SMALLER IN AREA TWO LARGER, 10 SMALLER IN AREA CODE 4340 40 21s� 40 46 Or 40 O 36 $ 60 o100D 0 !0 0 59 31 i3 .01 S8 51 39 .53 5e 40 40 55 W'4 7 1 A' i2.! 3 40 30 S /3 S J� i0 1 11 1 441 00 11 Ip ©c 0 52 40 40 AS S (PD 51 52 TRACT NO.1868 M.B. 26-21 i 40 43 1 (,0q.2 6SOb 11 S 50 11 40 't0 13 7 V 0 1 S3 7 1 01 011��~� 1 so `5-2J so. 6 h 0 . r -7- 4183 I„ LI -1[1U /v LVMrANY 21 SCALE I' = 60' 45 TRACT NO. 15546 r!, a . 334 -34 C(!OE 4340 10k PITY. ASSMT. SEE: r 50 —43 20" 0170 7 08 Q 0- W J J 145 II " cciTor 1Ii! i 9 5-1- • �,o.7s 1 "l"J 10 1 r ic.. 1[.I"-pro,. 2 or 75 1, I: 0 -ic)r(0 nK630— t 5353 A• 13\L'- J �l /r015- y j 19,.7),....6::::::;__ +5 �° 1 g�'w� 1 0 n 1C 1 C) h aso•• 67.15 1 1 1 I 1 19 18 1 Alsoo••• 1 CII 17 1 1 y 1 1 \ ,n \ 1`� a35s' 1 1 67.15 , N 77.107 CD' I A0 el 4 ,1270 •�J 11173 BTN 5 67.15 48 50 2 6 asc •N.17 5 4b5 s665" O r 2 48 50 61.19 SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH M.B. 3-11-12 ch `r- 7 7 ao 1.800•LARWOOD 9.1E -6Q ASSESSOR'S HAP COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CA "•t:l.�tJ.Y SY ... a:.Y:J�e iti��F.:;:•i;::1%?.'.�., :;t.;y,i':. ,.r1�•';� MARK LARW00.O COMPANY 4183 I 22 SCALE I" = 60' I} TIT IrTrirTIT lrIl('i,rrlrirTIFFrlT-r7.7Trir7i771Tl'1'1'lrlrl'Irl1'1rlri`1i1i1 11 21 I 3' ' 4 5: 6 1.800•LARWOOD COM 4340 TRACT NO . 15546 M.B. 334-34 FOR PREY. A;SMT. SEE: ; 59 - 43 RE 7$ ASSES30R'3 MAI COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIF. MARK LARWOOD COMPANY 41 8 3 20 SCALE 1" -• 60 • CODE 4340 FOR PREY, ASSMT. SEE: 1 5 9 - 4 & 43 TRACT NO. 15546 .. M.B. 334-34 SECOND ADDI T ION TO HERMOSA BEAC:-1 M. B. 3-11-12 HERMOSA GARDEN TRACT M.B.• 10-65 1•800•LARWOOD ASSESSOR'S MAP COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALI 74 7, OCT -19-94 WEL 13:04 P. FO?,•'HE =TOP OIL DT: October 17, 1994 TO: Steve Burrell - City Manager, Hermosa Beach FR: Rosamond Fogg RE: Extension of time, Macpherson Lease Part 2 FOR COUNCIL AGENDA Further to our conversation this morning: 1 310 379 6155 F.02 01/14/94 MacPherson Lease Expires, Clock Stops 272 Days elapse (1/14/94 to 10/12/94 _ 272) 10/12/94 Clock Starts 212 Days are added for time taken to obtain State Lands Commission approval of the Macpherson Lease beyond the 90 days deemed reasonable by Macpherson (6/30/92 to 4/28/93 - 90 days = 212) 28 Days court set aside lease approval not included in 272 days clock was stopped subsequent to the 01/14/94 expiration of the lease. 06/09/95 Lease expires (10/12/94 - 06/09/95 = 240 Days) I would like this matter re-examined because my understanding was that on 10/11/94, the Council was advised that the extension was based upon the following two factors: 1) the amount of 'unreasonable' time spent obtaining a tidelands lease for Macpherson and 2) when the clock would start again. In addition to those two factors is the third one we discussed this morning, i.e. the time period of the lease approval suspension. Your understanding was that the above-mentioned factors did not comprise the total 'calendar' that is being adjudged 'force majeure', but merely two components of an even larger total consisting of 452 days (now less 90) prior to the lease expiration plus a range of time falling between the expiration and 10/11/94. If so, I would still object that such a 'calendar' was not the subject of analysis or Council approval in a public meeting. I am also concerned because I spoke to Councilmen Edgerton and (very briefly) Bowler this weekend, but neither mentioned additional considerations. The City and Macpherson may freely amend the contract in whatever way is mutually agreeable, and revisiting the issue may result in other factors being considered to arrive at a different expiration date. Regardless, the public's interest requires and demands a clear understanding of the parameters forming the basis for this decision. CC: Jan Chattan-Brown b1 VOUCHRE2 10/12/94 17:49 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 1617 10/06/94 004623 LAURA ROZZI SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 297.50 297.50 TOTAL CHECKS 297.50 16 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 2 10/12/94 17:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 297.50 TOTAL 297.50 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/12/94 17:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES / TO INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR /C1/46/rj ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE /D/gq PAGE 3 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/13/94 06:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 1 PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 1618 10/10/94 001364 STEVE WISNIEWSKI SETTLEMENT/S. WISNIEWSKI 705-1209-4324 20,000.00 20,000.00 TOTAL CHECKS 20,000.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/13/94 06:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS - FUND TITLE 705 INSURANCE FUND TOTAL AMOUNT 20,000.00 20,000.00 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 10/13/94 06:35 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES TO 8 INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR /O!/D/Q� ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FIN CE DIRECT DATE / e/44/9cl PAGE 3 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/13/94 06:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 1619 10/12/94 006071 LA COUNTY FIRE DEPT SEMINAR REGISTRATION/G. DALE 001-2201-4316 200.00 200.00 TOTAL CHECKS 200.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/13/94 06:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 200.00 TOTAL 200.00 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/13/94 06:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES / TO 3 INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR JD/J2V4cl PAYME T, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR BY FINA CE DIRECTOR DATE /c1/4.7/91/ PAGE 3 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/19/94 19:46 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 1620 10/13/94 003797 VIRGINIA ELLEDGE PER DIEM ADVANCE 001-2101-4317 112.00 112.00 1621 10/13/94 003057 SAN RAMON MARRIOTT HOTEL ADVANCE/V. ELLEDGE 001-2101-4317 394.68 394.68 1622 10/13/94 006073 SANTA MONICA BAY RESTOR SETTLEMENT/NRDC 160-8302-4201 7,500.00 - 7,500.00 1623 10/13/94 006074 NATIONAL RES DEFENSE CO SETTLEMENT/N.R.D.C. 160-8302-4201 62,500.00 62,500.00 1624 10/13/94 001662 KNOTT'S BERRY FARM TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 001-4601-4201 900.00 900.00 1625 10/13/94 006075 ODYSSEY TOURS, INC. TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 001-4601-4201 280.00 BUS/COMM RES TRIP 145-3409-4201 550.00 830.00 TOTAL CHECKS 72,236.68 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/19/94 19:46 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 145 PROPOSITION ,A FUND 160 SEWER FUND TOTAL 1,686.68 550.00 70,000.00 72,236.68 PAGE 2 • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/19/94 19:46 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES / TO INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR /4/M/90 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMEWT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE /21 PAGE 3 VOUCHRE2 10/17/94 12:49 ---> VOID CHECKS . CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 001626 TO 001634 VOID/PRINTER SET-UP 001677 VOID 001704 VOID PAGE 1 VOUCHRE2 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 1635 10/17/94 000773 1994 CPPA CONFERENCE 1636 10/17/94 002744 A & E TROPHIES 1637 10/17/94 006036 AAA UNDER CAR PARTS 1638 10/17/94 003388 ACTION BATTERY 1639 10/17/94 000138 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 1640 10/17/94 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 1641 10/17/94 005728 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR 1642 10/17/94 000857 AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 1643 10/17/94 004300 ASSOCIATED DIESEL 1644 10/17/94 005179 AT&T 1645 10/17/94 000407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY 1646 10/17/94 004767 B & S INDUSTRIES 1647 10/17/94 005968 B & W COMMUNICATIONS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CONFERENCE REG/M. HITE ANNUAL DUES/M. HITE CITY ATTORNEY PLAQUE RACK & PINION STEERING/NISSAN BATTERIES/RESCUE 11 RADAR REPAIRS/POLICE/AUG-SEP RADIO PARTS/POLICE-SEP 94 CLOSED CIRCUIT VIDEO CAMERA MOBILE PHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 MOBILE PHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 MOBILE PHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 PRISONER MEALS/SEP 94 TUNE-UP/FIRE ENGINE 12 POLICE FAX LONG DISTANCE/SEP KEYS/LOCKSMITH SERV -SEP 94 KEYS/LOCKSMITH SERV -SEP 94 KEYS/LOCKSMITH SERV -SEP 94 FIRE LINE BARRICADE TAPE MICROPHONE/FIRE DEPT RADIO 1648 10/17/94 004677 BANK OF AMERICA, NT & S SAFEKEEPING FEES/AUGUST 94 1649 10/17/94 006065 RAMON BARBOZA 1650 10/17/94 006050 RUTH BARRON 1651 10/17/94 003420 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 1652 10/17/94 000252 BEACH TRAVEL 1653 10/17/94 005253 BECKER SURFBOARDS 1654 10/17/94 003136 ROBERT BENZ CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES MOTOROLA RADIO BATTERIES AIRFARE ADVANCE/V. ELLEDGE CHEVRON SURF CAMP SUPPLIES PER DIEM ADVANCE 1655 10/17/94 006056 BLACK STAR OIL COMPANY USED MOTOR OIL REMOVAL 1656 10/17/94 002411 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZA SALES TAX TAPES/JUL-SEP 94 ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-1204-4317 110-1204-4315 001-1101-4319 001-2101-4311 001-2201-4311 001-2101-4309 001-2101-4309 001-2101-5401 170-2103-4304 001-4202-4304 001-2201-4304 001-2101-4306 001-2201-4311 001-2101-4304 110-3302-4309 001-4204-4309 001-6101-4309 001-2701-4309 001-2201-4309 001-1141-4201 110-3302 001-2110 001-3895 001-2101-4307 001-2101-4317 001-3894 001-1101-4317 001-4205-4201 001-1207-4251 ITEM AMOUNT 275.00 65.00 24.04 247.90 103.92 550.79 248.98 349.65 243.09 110.45 35.41 229.95 982.57 5.85 21.65 9.19 1.35 161.01 117.67 250.00 22.00 50.00 8.70- 969.92 144.00 1,216.73 150.00 55.00 32.48 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 340.00 24.04 247.90 103.92 550.79 598.63 388.95 229.95 982.57 5.85 32.19 161.01 117.67 250.00 22.00 41.30 969.92 144.00 1,216.73 150.00 55.00 32.48 VOUCHRE2 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 1657 10/17/94 006051 CHRISTINE BONN 1658 10/17/94 005130 BORAL RESOURCES, INC. 1659 10/17/94 003270 JOHN BOWLER 1660 10/17/94 000163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 1661 10/17/94 006063 TRAVIS BROOKS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES ASPHALT PURCHASES/SEP 94 PER DIEM ADVANCE PRISONER LAUNDRY/SEP 94 CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 1662 10/17/94 000155 BROWNING & FERRIS INDUS TRASH PICKUP/OCTOBER 94 TRASH PICKUP/OCTOBER 94 1663 10/17/94 005621 STEPHEN R. BURRELL PER DIEM ADVANCE 1664 10/17/94 003689 C.P.O.A. TUITION/V. STRASER 1665 10/17/94 003066 CA MUNICIPAL STATISTICS DEBT STMT/FINANCIAL REP -06/30 1666 10/17/94 005595 CALIFORNIA CHARTER 1667 10/17/94 002135 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1668 10/17/94 005147 CANYON CITY PRINTING 1669 10/17/94 003972 CARE STATION 1670 10/17/94 003293 JEANNE CARUSO BUS/COMMUNITY RESOURCES TRIP SEMINAR REGISTRATION/MEBIUS WORKERS COMP CHECK FORMS HEPATITIS B SHOTS/AUG-SEP REIMBURSE MILES/STC TRAINING 1671 10/17/94 000389 CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPM TONER CARTRIDGE/POLICE DEPT 1672 10/17/94 005643 SHARON CHALFANT 1673 10/17/94 000014 CHAMPION CHEVROLET 1674 10/17/94 006054 GUADALUPE CHAVEZ 1675 10/17/94 005970 DENNIS COLLINS 1676 10/17/94 000017 COM SYSTEMS, INC REIMB BOOKS/TUITION-FALL 94 AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP 94 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG LONG DISTANCE •CHARGES/AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2110 001-3895 001-3103-4309 001-1101-4317 001-2101-4306 110-3302 001-1208-4201 109-3301-4201 001-1201-4317 001-2101-4312 001-1202-4201 145-3409-4201 001-2101-4316 705-1217-4201 001-1203-4320 001-2101-4313 001-2101-4305 110-1204-4316 001-2101-4311• 001-2110 001-4601-4221 001-1121-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1206-4304 001-1207-4304 001-2101-4304 105-2601-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4101-4304 ITEM AMOUNT 50.00 6.70- 30.92 150.00 246.55 20.00 635.64 375.17 150.00 148.00 350.00 461.51 100.00 163.01 1,328.00 234.78 32.42 651.13 453.94 250.00 546.00 3.99 6.31 9.00 7.06 36.43 7.52 132.56 1.13 9.80 3.74 16.07 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 43.30 30.92 150.00 246.55 20.00 1,010.81 150.00 148.00 350.00 461.51 100.00 163.01 1,328.00 234.78 32.42 651.13 453.94 250.00 • 546.00 VOUCHRE2 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 1678 10/17/94 005511 COMPUTER CITY 1679 10/17/94 006057 THE CORE GROUP 1680 10/17/94 002971 JIM CUBBERLEY 1681 10/17/94 000642 THE DAILY BREEZE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG 94 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG 94 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG 94 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES/AUG 94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN DESKJET PRINTER/CARTRIDGES NETWORK EQUIPMENT ADDITION NOVELL NETWORK SUPPORT SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR EMPLOYEE ADS/SEPTEMBER 94 1682 10/17/94 002362 DALE & BARNEY'S TELEVIS EMERGENCY TAPE RECORDER REPAIR 1683 10/17/94 001390 DAPPER TIRE CO. 1684 10/17/94 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. 1685 10/17/94 005355 J.F. DAVIDSON & ASSOC 1686 10/17/94 000303 DEL AMO MOTORS 1687 10/17/94 004383 JIM DENNERLINE TIRES PURCHASED/SEP 94 TIRES PURCHASED/SEP 94 TIRES PURCHASED/SEP 94 TIRES PURCHASED/SEP 94 TIRES PURCHASED/SEP 94 TIRES/FIRE ENGINE #11 HANDHELD CHARGING CRADLES FINAL PMT/VALLEY PARK SERVICES MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS/SEP 94 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1688 10/17/94 004074 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL S SERVICE CHARGE/JEEP PURCHASE 1689 10/17/94 002855 DICTAPHONE, INC. 1690 10/17/94 004453 MIKE DIRHAM DISPATCH HEADSET CLEANERS PRESS RELEASES/DWNTWN ENH COMM 1691 10/17/94 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL FILM PURCHASES/AUG & SEP 94 1692 10/17/94 001498 DYNAMED PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES/JUNE 94 1693 10/17/94 002840 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY COPIER MAINT/AUG 94 COPIER METER USE/JUL 94 1694 10/17/94 002514 EASTMAN, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES/STOCK-SEP 94 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 001-6101-4304 001-2021 001-2022 001-1206-5402 001-1206-5402 001-1206-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-1203-4201 001-1101-4305 110-3302-4311 001-4204-4311 001-6101-4311 001-2201-4311 001-4202-4311 001-2201-4311 001-1206-5402 125-8506-4201 001-2101-4311 001-4601-4221 001-2101-5403 001-2101-4305 109-3301-4302 001-2101-4305 001-2201-4309 001-1208-4201 001-1208-4201 001-1208-4305 ITEM AMOUNT 14.24 40.87 14.07 2.96 10.97 10.97- 827.47 1,948.58 1,500.00 98.00 122.50 819.00 77.00 346.50 77.99 85.00 328.64 323.72 58.78 141.27 163.37 1,376.55 1,800.00 151.00 314.35 136.50 202.49 42.89 498.54 178.19 59.48 345.00 231.27 is PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 305.75 827.47 • 3,448.58 1,463.00 77.99 85.00 2,392.33 1,800.00 151.00 314.35 136.50 202.49 42.89 498.54 178.19 59.48 576.27 75.34 75.34 VOUCHRE2 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 1695 10/17/94 000165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO P AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP AUTO PARTS/CITY GARAGE/SEP DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN 1696 10/17/94 005509 RICK ESCALANTE SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1697 10/17/94 006048 FAST EDDIE PUBLISHING C CA DRUNK DRIVING LAW UPDATE 1698 10/17/94 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. DELIVERY SERVICE/SEP 94 DELIVERY SERVICES/SEP 94 1699 10/17/94 003169 STEVE FILLMAN SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR ACCOUNT NUMBER 94 001-4205-4309 94 160-3102-4311 94 001-6101-4311 94 001-2401-4311 94 001-2101-4311 94 105-2601-4311 94 001-3103-4311 94 001-2201-4311 94 110-3302-4311 94 001-4202-4311 94 001-4201-4311 001-2021 001-2022 1700 10/17/94 006061 FPG INTERNATIONAL CORP. DOWNTOWN AREA ACTIVITY BANNERS 1701 10/17/94 001318 GAMETIME 1702 10/17/94 006053 ELISE GRAVES SWING SET PARTS ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 1703 10/17/94 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-1132-4305 109-8160-4201 125-8523-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 109-3301-4302 001-6101-4309 001-2110 001-3895 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1206-4304 001-1207-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-2401-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4101-4304 ITEM AMOUNT 212.34 132.37 2.66 3.56 197.69 27.99 280.27 24.78 200.64 164.19 130.98 28.11 28.11- 189.00 42.00 84.00 78.30 38.00 22.50 686.00 336.00 448.00 600.00 145.31 50.00 6.70- 10.65 26.52 7.89 7.89 18.12 19.02 85.32 87.45 204.69 35.10 8.75 1,018.15 54.88 14.79 149.39 164.17 112.80 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 1,377.47 315.00 78.30 60.50 1,470.00 600.00 145.31 43.30 VOUCHRE2 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 1705 10/17/94 001340 GTEL 1706 10/17/94 004331 JANICE GUERRERO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 TELEPHONE CHARGES/SEP 94 EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SEP 94 MODEM JACK/BASE II4 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1707 10/17/94 000946 HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES/SEP 94 1708 10/17/94 005345 CITY OF HAWTHORNE 1709 10/17/94 006067 WILLIAM HEDRICK 1710 10/17/94 004075 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1711 10/17/94 002336 MARCIA HITE 1712 10/17/94 005204 ICE CAPADES CHALET SUMMER CAMP PROGRAM FEES CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW `WORKERS' COMP CLAIMS/SEP 94 WORKERS' COMP CLAIMS/OCT 94 WORKERS' COMP CLAIMS/OCT 94 PER DIEM ADVANCE SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1713 10/17/94 005254 INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP DISPATCH SYS MAINT/SEP 94 DISPATCH SYS MAINT/SEP 94 MAC PC MAINTENANCE/SEP 94 1714 10/17/94 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE 1715 10/17/94 001740 INTERTEC COMPUTER SERVI 1716 10/17/94 006059 MARGARET KEPNER 1717 10/17/94 002868 DON KOTT AUTO CENTER 1718 10/17/94 001224 L.A. BASIN CHAPTER, I.0 1719 10/17/94 005302 LA MIRADA THEATER 1720 10/17/94 003044 SHERRIA LAWRENCE 1721 10/17/94 000167 LEARNED LUMBER ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/SEP 94 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/SEP 94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN COMPUTER PRINTER MAINT/SEP-OCT COMM RESOURCES TRIP REFUND FIRE DEPT PICK-UP TRUCK SEMINAR REG/SWARTZ & CORNEAL TICKETS/COMM RESOURCES TRIP REIMB TUITION/BOOKS-FALL 94 LUMBER/BLDG SUPPLIES -SEP 94 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 001-6101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-1206-4304 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4309 001-4601-4221 110-3302 705-1217-4182 705-1217-4182 705-1217-4182 110-1204-4317 001-4601-4221 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4201 160-3102-4309 105-2601-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-1206-4201 001-4601-4201 001-2201-5403 001-4201-4316 001-4601-4201 001-4201-4316 001-3101-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 162.76 284.18 144.10 7.89 51.56 145.00 56.00 10.50 49.00 42.00 42.00 66.50 95.26 60.00 30.00 3,293.40 6,577.05 15,254.05 150.00 164.50 457.80 305.20 137.00 151.12 597.95 9.53 9.53- 450.00 20.00 19,241.44 140.00 250.00 108.59 298.56 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 2,624.51 196.56 266.00 95.26 60.00 30.00 25,124.50 150.00 164.50 900.00 749.07 • 450.00 20.00 19,241.44 140.00 250.00 108.59 VOUCHRE2 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 1722 10/17/94 003708 DENNIS LINDSEY 1723 10/17/94 005072 LINE MASTER 1724 10/17/94 000077 LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVIC 1725 10/17/94 003390 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION LUMBER/BLDG SUPPLIES -SEP 94 LUMBER/BLDG SUPPLIES -SEP 94 LUMBER/BLDG SUPPLIES -SEP 94 ENTRY DOOR/BASE III FALL SLOW PITCH LEAG DIRECTOR PARTS/PAINT TRUCK SPRAY EQUIP DRAFTING SUPPLIES/SEP 94 DRAFTING SUPPLIES/SEP 94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN PARAMEDIC EXAM/M. GARAFANO 1726 10/17/94 000079 LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. BATTERIES/FIRE DEPT/AUG 94 1727 10/17/94 003810 MAC WAREHOUSE 1728 10/17/94 001255 MANERI SIGN CO., INC. 1729 10/17/94 000605 MANHATTAN FORD 1730 10/17/94 003120 MASTER K-9 1731 10/17/94 006058 JEANETTE MERINO TONER CARTRIDGES/POLICE/SEP 94 WARNING SIGNS/PAVEMENT MARKERS DEALER AUTO PARTS/REPAIRS-SEP K-9 MAINT TRAINING/JUL-SEP 94 REFUND OVERPMT/COND USE PERMIT 1732 10/17/94 000251 MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS TRAFFIC PAINT/THINNER 1733 10/17/94 006066 JACQUELINE NEUMEIR 1734 10/17/94 004914 OCS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1735 10/17/94 004142 OFFICE DEPOT 1736 10/17/94 002892 OLIVER, BARR & VOSE CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW SOFTWARE UPDATE/POLICE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE-SEP 94 OFFICE SUPPLIES/BLDG-SEP 94 OFFICE SUPP/COMM RES -SEP 94 OFFICE SUPP/CASHIER-SEP 94 OFFICE SUPP/STOCK-SEP 94 LEGAL SERVICES/AUGUST 94 LEGAL SERVICES/AUGUST 94 LEGAL SERVICES/AUGUST 94 1737 10/17/94 005107 OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVI 300' NOTICING/SEP 94 1738 10/17/94 002487 PAGENET PAGING SERVICE/OCTOBER 94 PAGING SERVICE/OCTOBER 94 PAGING SERVICE/OCTOBER 94 PAGING SERVICE/OCTOBER 94 PAGING SERVICE/OCTOBER 94 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4204-4309 001-3103-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4221 001-3104-4309 001-4202-4305 105-8145-4201 001-2021 001-2022 001-2201-4316 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4305 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4201 001-3812 001-3104-4309 110-3302 001-2101-4201 001-1202-4305' 001-4201-4305 001-4601-4305 110-1204-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1205-4201 001-4101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-1201-4201 001-1203-4201 001-2401-4201 001-4202-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 404.64 184.23 159.33 186.73 1,617.00 744.59 79.09 35.86 2.35 2.35- 200.00 84.44 176.70 733.39 105.42 210.00 74.25 955.85 275.00 250.00 8.00 12.82 48.42 47.26 709.12 32,792.15 735.00 287.50 1,125.00 199.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 110.00 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 1,233.49 1,617.00 744.59 114.95 200.00 84.44 176.70 733.39 105.42 210.00 74.25 955.85 275.00 250.00 825.62 33,814.65 1,125.00 VOUCHRE2 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 1739 10/17/94 000519 PAK WEST 1740 10/17/94 005971 PALOS VERDES STABLES 1741 10/17/94 000608 PEP BOYS 1742 10/17/94 002530 PHOENIX GROUP 1743 10/17/94 000398 POSTMASTER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGING SERVICE/OCTOBER 94 PAGING SERVICE/OCTOBER 94 JANITOR SUPPLIES/AUG-SEP 94 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR AUTO SUPPLIES/FIRE/SEP 94 HANDHELD PARKING CITES/ENV CITATION NOTICE POSTAGE 1744 10/17/94 001030 PRISON INDUSTRY AUTHORI FLAGS/STOCK 1745 10/17/94 002526 PROF COMMUNICATIONS INS K-9 CAR SAFETY EQUIP/SET-UP 1746 10/17/94 003816 RED LION HOTEL HOTEL ADVANCE/M. HITE 1747 10/17/94 006049 ROBERT F. KENNNEDY MEDI PRISONER EMERGENCY SERVICES 1748 10/17/94 006052 DAVID RODRIGUEZ 1749 10/17/94 000302 MARY C. ROONEY 1750 10/17/94 004061 SYLVIA R00T 1751 10/17/94 002859 DWAIN ROQUE 1752 10/17/94 004966 BETSY RUBINO 1753 10/17/94 001578 ED RUZAK & ASSOC. 1754 10/17/94 006047 JACOB SARWIN 1755 10/17/94 006072 HEATHER SHOREK 1756 10/17/94 001071 LEN SILVEY, 1757 10/17/94 001399 SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 1758 10/17/94 000361 SIR SPEEDY 1759 10/17/94 002186 SIRCHIE INC. ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES PER DIEM ADVANCE MINUTES SECRETARY/10-05-94 MINUTES SECRETARY/9-20-94 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR TRAFFIC ENGRG SERVICES/SEP 94 REFUND TOWING FEES REFUND TOWING FEES COMM RESOURCES TRIP REFUND TUITION/J. CARUSO PAINT PURCHASES/SEP 94 FLYERS/COMM RES PROGRAMS PRISONER ID SIGN/BOOKING ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4601-4201 001-1206-4201 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4311 110-3302-4305 110-1204-4305 001-1208-4305 170-2103-5402 110-1204-4317 001-2101-4201 001-2110 001-3895 001-4601-4317 109-3301-4201 001-4102-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-422t 001-4601-4221 001-3104-4201 001-3841 110-3302-4201 001-4601-4201 001-2101-4313 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4308 001-2101-4306 ITEM AMOUNT 33.00 11.00 840.21 555.00 38.78 1,996.22 2,000.00 607.56 2,391.88 162.80 573.80 50.00 7.70- 150.00 226.00 151.75 72.80 36.40 189.00 171.50 140.00 28.00 525.00 38.00 207.00 10.00 89.50 139.73 127.93 115.59 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 386.00 840.21 555.00 38.78 1,996.22 2,000.00 607.56 2,391.88 162.80 573.80 42.30 150.00 377.75 109.20 528.50 525.00 245.00 10.00 89.50 139.73 127.93 115.59 VOUCHRE2 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 1760 10/17/94 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP PRISONER SUPPLIES/SEP 94 1761 10/17/94 004987 SMOG EXPRESS SMOG TESTS/SEP 94 1762 10/17/94 004850 SO BAY FIRE PREVENTION ANNUAL DUES/FIRE DEPARTMENT 1763 10/17/94 003353 SOUTH BAY CREDIT UNION JULY EXPENSE/STRASER 1764 10/17/94 000107 SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 1765 10/17/94 003685 SOUTH BAY JEEP EAGLE 1766 10/17/94 000018 SOUTH BAY WELDERS 1767 10/17/94 006060 SOUTH COAST AQMD 1768 10/17/94 000159 BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING/SEP 94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN REPAIRS/POLICE DEPT JEEP WELDING SUPPLIES/SEP 94 WELDING SUPPLIES/SEP 94 WELDING SUPPLIES/SEP 94 SPRAY EQUIP PERMIT/CITY YARD SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI ELECTRIC BILLINGS/SEP 94 ELECTRIC BILLINGS/SEP 94 ELECTRIC BILLINGS/SEP 94 ELECTRIC BILLINGS/SEP 94 ELECTRIC BILLINGS/SEP 94 ELECTRIC BILLINGS/SEP 94 1769 10/17/94 000170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS NATURAL GAS BILLINGS/SEP 94 1770 10/17/94 003480 SQUEEKERS & HERB 1771 10/17/94 000707 TOURNAMENT AWARD SHIRTS STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZA SALES TAX DUE/JUL-SEP 94 SALES TAX DUE/JUL-SEP 94 SALES TAX DUE/JUL-SEP 94 SALES TAX DUE/JUL-SEP 94 SALES TAX DUE/JUL-SEP 94 1772 10/17/94 003962 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZA 1773 10/17/94 000364 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1774 10/17/94 006046 DEAN STEHLIK 1775 10/17/94 000897 VAL STRASER 1776 10/17/94 006069 CANDY STUBBS 1777 10/17/94 006064 NANCY SUESS 1778 10/17/94 000806 SUN BADGE COMPANY UNDERGROUND TANK FEES/JUL-SEP FINGERPRINT APPS/SEP 94 REFUND TOWING FEES REFUND TOWING FEES MEALS/P.O.S.T. CLASS FALL CLASS REFUND CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW • ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4306 110-3302-4311 001-2201-4315 001-2101-4317 001-2101-4201 001-2021 001-2022 001-2101-4311 001-3103-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4205-4309 001-4205-4251 001-4204-4303 001-6101-4303 001-3101-4303 160-3102-4303 105-2601-4303 001-3104-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4601-4308 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4309 001-1206-5401 001-3901 110-3901 001-4205-4251 001-2101-4251 001-3841 110-3302-4201 001-2101-4312 001-3893 110-3302 ITEM AMOUNT 99.21 40.00 100.00 241.77 48.30 20.70 20.70- 107.64 95.65 85.92 62.57 432.14 10,591.76 2,429.72 57.96 63.40 199.93 616.39 403.69 263.05 19.00 16.00 62.00 264.00 111.00 61.58 96.00 38.00 77.00 16.00 35.00 20.00 COMM SERV OFCR'S BADGE/SEP 94 110-3302-4187 57.71 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 99.21 40.00 100.00 241.77 48.30 107.64 244.14 432.14 13,959.16 403.69 263.05 472.00 61.58 96.00 115.00 16.00 35.00 20.00 57.71 VOUCHRE2 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 1779 10/17/94 004247 J. E. TALLERICO 1780 10/17/94 000124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 1781 10/17/94 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 1782 10/17/94 006068 GABRIEL TRIQUEROS 1783 10/17/94 004768 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT MAINT/OCT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION COMPUTER CONVERSION/SEP 94 PLUMBING PARTS/SEP 94 HARDWARE PURCHASES/SEP 94 HARDWARE PURCHASES/SEP 94 HARDWARE PURCHASES/SEP 94 HARDWARE PURCHASES/SEP 94 HARDWARE PURCHASES/SEP 94 HARDWARE PURCHASES/SEP 94 HARDWARE PURCHASES/SEP 94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN ASPHALT/CONCRETE BLADES OVER THE LINE TOURNEY DIRECTOR 1784 10/17/94 003374 JOHN VAN DEN EYKEL 1785 10/17/94 004968 MARY VANDERBUR-MANN 1786 10/17/94 006062 ED VARTANIAN 1787 10/17/94 006055 DEBRA WEEKS 1788 10/17/94 005125 JOHN M. WORKMAN, SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES REIMB PETTY CASH/9-28 TO 10-10 REIMB PETTY CASH/9-28 TO 10-10 REIMB PETTY CASH/9-28 TO 10-10 REIMB PETTY CASH/9-28 TO 10-10 REIMB PETTY CASH/9-28 TO 10-10 REIMB PETTY CASH/9-28 TO 10-10 REIMB PETTY CASH/9-28 TO 10-10 REIMB PETTY CASH/9-28 TO 10-10 REIMB PETTY CASH/9-28 TO 10-10 RE1MB PETTY CASH/9-28 TO 10-10 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1206-4201 160-3102-4309 001-3104-4309 105-2601-4309 001-4204-4309 001-6101-4309 001-3103-4309 160-3102-4309 160-8302-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-3103-4309 001-4601-4221 001-1206-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 110-3302 001-2110 001-3895 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4316 001-2201-4305 001-2401-4305 001-3103-4309 001-4101-4201 001-4202-4305 001-4601-4201 001-4601-4305 001-4601-4308 1789 10/17/94 000135 XEROX CORPORATION METER USE & MAINT/AUG-SEP 94 001-1208-4201 TOTAL CHECKS ITEM AMOUNT 50.00 34.64 20.41 106.52 288.65 60.95 146.32 70.24 100.87 88.22 88.22- 1,039.00 280.00 754.00 87.50 52.50 35.00 20.00 100.00 15.40- 16.87 25.00 18.77 73.50 14.02 24.25 42.76 16.55 10.00 86.09 745.73 PAGE 10 CHECK AMOUNT 50.00 34.64 1,832.96 280.00 754.00 140.00 35.00 20.00 84.60 327.81 745.73 156,000.98 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING DISTRICT 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 110 PARKING FUND 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 145 PROPOSITION ,A FUND 160 SEWER FUND 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND 705 INSURANCE FUND TOTAL 117,078.61 969.38 1,737.71 7,105.15 173.50 461.51 552.64 2,634.97 25,287.51 156,000.98 PAGE 11 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/17/94 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON /PAGES / TO /� INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR /Q/ / 7/q 41 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYME T, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINA CE DIRECTOR Y DATE /07/97' PAGE 12 October 17, 1994 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council October 25, 1994 CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. #047893 - 7/18/94 - L.A. County Metro. Transportation Agency - $502.00 - Account 145-400-3403-4251. Warrant was never received by vendor. Payment stopped. Concur: Stephen!Rj'Burrell Noted or fiscal impact City Manager Viki Copeland October 20, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of October 25, 1994 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS November 8, 1994 Amendment to Circulation Element to include the North portion of the Strand bikeway and pedestrian path for improvements. Records Retention Schedule Sewer Reconstruction Plan Ordinance on display of adult magazines Encroachment Permit Ordinance Recommendation to Deny Claims November 22, 1994 ADA Report Award of Biltmore Park contract Parking Permit grace period December 13, 1994 Downtown report for City Council review Award of Pier Design contract Award of South Park construction contract Community Dev. Director City Clerk Public Works Director City Attorney City Attorney Risk Manager Risk Manager Public Works Director Finance Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director ic October 20, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 25, 1994 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS SEPTEMER 1994 Attached are the September Revenue and Expenditure Status Reports. General Fund revenue is 16.4% received for 25% of the fiscal year. General Fund revenue is typically somewhat low until mid -year when property taxes are received. Parking Fund revenue is 33.8% received. General Fund expenditures are 24.3% for 25% of the fiscal year; Parking Fund expenditures are 25.3% of budget due to vehicle purchases. CONCUR: Stephen fit. Burrell, Viki Copeland, City Manager Finance Director 1d�,, REVPRIN2 10/20/94 09:22:14 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 1 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 2,845,072.00 .00 .00 2,845,072.00 0.0 3102 CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 195,250.00 .00 146,663.65 48,586.35 75.1 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 191,521.00 483.47- 79.02 191,441.98 0.0 3106 SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813 45,748.00 7,830.30 16,761.33 28,986.67 36.6 3107 TRANSFER TAX 42,600.00 7,767.61 14,145.92 28,454.08 33.2 3108 SALES TAX 1,420,000.00 171,295.55 297,095.55 1,122,904.45 20.9 3109 1/2 CENT SALES TX EXT 117,299.00 9,380.10 20,574.03 96,724.97 17.5 3110 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 155,000.00 .00 .00 155,000:00 0.0 3111 ELECTRIC FRANCHISE 43,949.00 .00 .00 43,949.00 0.0 3112 GAS FRANCHISE 30,497.00 .00 .00 30,497.00 0.0 3113 REFUSE FRANCHISE 163,000.00 .00 29,148.08 133,851.92 17.9 3114 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 216,384.00 .00 52,337.76 164,046.24 24.2 3115 BUSINESS LICENSE 510,000.00 25,150.46 95,584.48 414,415.52 18.7 TAXES 5,976,320.00 220,940.55 672,389.82 5,303,930.18 11.3 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS 3202 DOG LICENSES 13,246.00 3,971.65 4,257.35 8,988.65 32.1 3203 BICYCLE LICENSES 200.00 19.50 103.92 96.08 52.0 3204 BUILDING PERMITS 69,000.00 1,780.37 12,720.06 56,279.94 18.4 3205 ELECTRIC PERMITS 14,000.00 251.85 1,547.50 12,452.50 11.1 3206 PLUMBING PERMITS 13,000.00 1,109.85 2,584.50 10,415.50 19.9 3207 OCCUPANCY PERMITS 10,000.00 1,031.00 2,436.00 7,564.00 24.4 3209 GARAGE SALES 110.00 9.90 49.50 60.50 45.0 3211 BANNER PERMITS 3,100.00 200.75 1,204.50 1,895.50 38.9 3212 ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 271.00 .00 108.50 162.50 40.0 3213 ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 3,000.00 161.00 591.00 2,409.00 19.7 3214 AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 2,400.00 304.00 798.00 1,602.00 33.3 3215 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT 1,000.00 65.00 130.00 870.00 13.0 3216 SPRAY BOOTH PERMIT 146.00 .00 .00 146.00 0.0 3217 OPEN FIRE PERMIT 47.00 .00 46.75 .25 99.5 3218 AUTO REPAIR PERMIT 1,500.00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 LICENSES AND PERMITS 131,020.00 8,904.87 26,577.58 104,442.42 20.3 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 110,000.00 7,584.71 20,637.83 89,362.17 18.8 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 130,151.00 3,060.63 4,002.08 126,148.92 3.1 3402 RENTS & CONCESSIONS 3,130.00 209.38 777.89 2,352.11 24.9 3403 PIER REVENUE 10,500.00 1,285.80 3,839.00 6,661.00 36.6 3404 COMM CTR LEASES 119,772.00 9,981.00 29,938.00 89,834.00 25.0 3405 COMM CTR RENTALS 52,000.00 4,866.00 12,239.00 39,761.00 23.5 3406 COMM CTR THEATRE 22,000.00 2,228.00 6,209.66 15,790.34 28.2 3411 OTHER FACILITIES 20,000.00 1,415.00 2,943.00 17,057.00 14.7 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.OX OF BUDGET YEAR) .001 GENERAL FUND PAGE 2 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 BALANCE X COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3412 TENNIS COURTS 14,000.00 822.50 3,228.00 10,772.00 23.1 3414 PROP A CONVERSION 102,000.00 .00 .00 102,000.00 0.0 3418 SPECIAL EVENTS 30,000.00 1,844.00 21,033.50 8,966.50 70.1 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 503,553.00 25,712.31 84,210.13 419,342.87 - 16.7 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 300.00 .00 198.27 101.73 66.1 3505 IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 614,006.00 50,588.44 167,875.31 446,130.69 27.3 3507 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 9,800.00 .00 .00 9,800.00 0.0 3508 MANDATED COSTS 5,732.00 .00 .00 5,732.00 0.0 3509 HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE 60,810.00 .00 .00 60,810.00 0.0 3510 POST 10,000.00 .00 2,312.14 7,687.86 23.1 3511 STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 3,840.00 144.00 144.00 3,696.00 3.8 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 704,488.00 50,732.44 170,529.72 533,958.28 24.2 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3801 RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 10,000.00 1,174.50 2,914.50 7,085.50 29.1 3802 SIGN REVIEW 3,000.00 173.50 965.00 2,035.00 32.2 3803 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 4,800.00 .00 960.00 3,840.00 20.0 3805 CONDTL USE PERMIT AMEND 3,470.00 347.00 347.00 3,123.00 10.0 3806 BOARD OF APPEALS 450.00 325.50 325.50 124.50 72.3 3808 ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW 1,003.00 .00 1,003.25 .25- 100.0 3809 TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW 998.00 .00 .00 998.00 0.0 3810 FINAL MAP REVIEW 488.00 - .00 244.00 244.00 50.0 3812' CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 3,905.00 725.00 2,026.50 1,878.50 51.9 3813 PLAN CHECK FEES 36,000.00 684.00 4,397.53 31,602.47 12.2 3814 PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL 700.00 .00 .00 700.00 0.0 3815 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 11,000.00 87.00 3,906.31 7,093.69 35.5 3818 POLICE SERVICES 16,000.00 913.55 3,350.65 12,649.35 20.9 3819 JAIL SERVICES 2,000.00 271.00 1,491.00 509.00 74.6 3821 FINGERPRINT SERVICE 5,000.00 364.00 975.00 4,025.00 19.5 3823 SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 15,000.00 6,913.72 10,985.72 4,014.28 73.2 3824 VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES 50.00 .00 11.00 39.00 22.0 3825 PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 63.00 .00 .00 63.00 0.0 3827 LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 5,703.00 .00 .00 5,703.00 0.0 3831 STREET CUT INSPECTION 48,254.00 157.25 629.00 47,625.00 1.3 3834 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 15,000.00 704.05 5,011.15 9,988.85 33.4 3836 FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE 10,519.00 1,031.00 2,482.25 8,036.75 23.6 3837 RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 1,500.00 120.00 426.00 1,074.00 28.4 3838 SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO 250.00 .00 27.60 222.40 11.0 3839 PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 1,000.00 45.73 121.35 878.65 12.1 3840 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 6,500.00 492.50 3,721.64 2,778.36 57.3 3841 POLICE TOWING 40,000.00 3,260.00 10,214.00 29,786.00 25.5 3857 PKG PLAN APPLICATION 4,990.00 .00 .00 4,990.00 0.0 3858 TENANT REFUSE BILLING 200.00 86.50 129.50 70.50 64.8 3859 REFUSE LIEN FEE 1,000.00 .00 2,470.96 1,470.96- 247.1 REVPRIN2 10/20/94 09:22:14 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 3 BALANCE % COL 3861 HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT 4,223.00 .00 .00 4,223.00 0.0 3862 ALARM PERMIT FEE 2,500.00 260.00 682.50 1,817.50 27.3 3863 FALSE ALARM FEE 1,300.00 .00 542.50 757.50 41.7 3864 C.U.P./FENCES/WALLS .00 207.50 207.50 207.50 *** 3866 NONCONFORMING REMODELS 3,634.00 .00 726.75 2,907.25 20.0 3867 PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS 1,242.00 .00 1,242.00 .00 100.0 3868 PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT 7,370.00 1,474.00 3,316.50 4,053.50 45.0 3869 2ND PARTY RESPONSE 300.00 2,151.00 2,301.00 2,001.00- 767.0 3871 PARAMEDIC RESP/NON-TRSP 6,000.00 642.50 2,221.30 3,778.70 37.0 3872 LOCK -OUT (CAR) 130.00 .00 .00 130.00 0.0 3873 LOCK -OUT (HOUSE) 206.00 .00 .00 206.00 0.0 3874 FLOODING WATER REMOVAL 94.00 .00 .00 94.00 0.0 3878 COMML BLDG/APT INSPECT 380.00 .00 .00 380.00 0.0 3883 FINAL/TENT MAP EXTNSION 1,220.00 .00 .00 1,220.00 0.0 3890 300,RADIUS NOTCG/APL CC 416.00 .00 .00 416.00 0.0 3893 CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 99,000.00 15,761.00 30,365.70 68,634.30 30.7 3894 OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS 25,000.00 202.00 3,942.00 21,058.00 15.8 3895 ANIMAL TRAP FEE 400.00 38.50 100.40 299.60 25.1 3897 ADMIN FEE, INS CERTIF .00 449.25- 374.00- 374.00 *** 3898 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 1,041.00 .00 .00 1,041.00 0.0 3899 C.U.P. MINOR AMEND. .00 100.00 200.00 200.00- *** CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 403,299.00 38,263.05 104,610.56 298,688.44 25.9 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 2,500.00 37.50 3,197.50 697.50- 127.9 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR .00 10.20 10.20 10.20- *** 3903 CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 3,000.00 25.00 5,655.00 2,655.00- 188.5 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 1,945.17 1,992.22 992.22- 199.2 3909 LATE FEE 10.00 755.47 1,113.20 1,103.20- 999.9+ 3916 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 21,000.00 .00 .00 21,000.00 0.0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 2,238,537.00 186,544.75 559,634.25 1,678,902.75 25.0 OTHER REVENUE 2,266,047.00 189,318.09 571,602.37 1,694,444.63 25.2 REVENUE CONTROL 10,094,727.00 541,456.02 1,650,558.01 8,444,168.99 16.4 GENERAL FUND 10,094,727.00 541,456.02 1,650,558.01 8,444,168.99 16.4 REVPRIN2 10/20/94 09:22:14 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING DISTRICT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE r PAGE 4 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 182,428.00 .00 .00 182,428.00 0.0 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 3,400.00 .00 3,825.93 425.93--112.5 TAXES 185,828.00 .00 3,825.93 182,002.07 2.1 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 49,440.00 2,518.03 3,129.41 46,310.59 6.3 REVENUE CONTROL 235,268.00 2,518.03 6,955.34 228,312.66 3.0 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING DISTRICT 235,268.00 2,518.03 6,955.34 228,312.66 3.0 I REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) .109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 5 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 15,284.00 987.21 1,220.04 14,063.96 8.0 3407 PARKING LOT RENTAL 18,116.00 1,509.67 4,529.01 13,586.99 - 25.0 3413 PARKING LOT LEASE 180,000.00 15,000.00 45,000.00 135,000.00 25.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 213,400.00 17,496.88 50,749.05 162,650.95 23.8 3900 3902 OTHER REVENUE REFUNDS/REIMB/PREV YEARS REVENUE CONTROL DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND .00 40.00 40.00 213,400.00 17,536.88 50,789.05 213,400.00 17,536.88 50,789.05 40.00- *** 162,610.95 23.8 162,610.95 23.8 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 110 PARKING FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES PAGE 6 BALANCE % COL 3302 COURT FINES/PARKING 950,000.00 138,732.00 383,997.40 566,002.60 40.4 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY ~ 3401 INTEREST INCOME 5,728.00 403.39 553.29 5,174.71 9.7 3407 PARKING LOT RENTAL .00 400.00 1,200.00 1,200.00- *** USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 5,728.00 803.39 1,753.29 3,974.71 30.6 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3842 PARKING METERS 700,000.00 71,200.22 230,306.78 469,693.22 32.9 3843 PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL 215,000.00 2,483.00 13,874.50 201,125.50 6.5 3844 DAILY PARKING PERMITS 700.00 179.10 674.55 25.45 96.4 3848 DRIVEWAY PERMITS 500.00 3.00 22.00 478.00 4.4 3849 GUEST PERMITS 1,400.00 99.00 558.50 841.50 39.9 3850 CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS 1,400.00 21.75 87.00 1,313.00 6.2 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 919,000.00 73,986.07 245,523.33 673,476.67 26.7 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP .00 .00 2,345.00 2,345.00- *** REVENUE CONTROL 1,874,728.00 213,521.46 633,619.02 1,241,108.98 33.8 PARKING FUND 1,874,728.00 213,521.46 633,619.02 1,241,108.98 33.8 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 72,391.00 6,227.46 18,668.11 53,722.89 25.8 3502 SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 144,740.00 12,973.54 36,653.50 108,086.50 25.3 3503 SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION 4,000.00 .00 4,000.00 .00 100.0 3512 SECTION 2105 (PROP 111) 104,687.00 9,170.47 27,579.83 77,107.17 26.3 3522 TDA ARTICLE 3/LOCAL 6,769.00 .00 .00 6,769.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 332,587.00 28,371.47 86,901.44 245,685.56 26.1 PAGE 7 BALANCE % COL 30,881.00 872.43 1,067.35 29,813.65 3.5 REVENUE CONTROL 363,468.00 29,243.90 87,968.79 275,499.21 24.2 STATE GAS TAX FUND 363,468.00 29,243.90 87,968.79 275,499.21 24.2 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.OX OF BUDGET YEAR) .120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3601 COUNTY AID TO CITIES REVENUE CONTROL COUNTY GAS TAX FUND PAGE 8 BALANCE % COL 326.00 18.38 22.69 303.31 7.0 89,299.00 .00 .00 89,299.00 0.0 89,625.00 18.38 22.69 89,602.31 0.0 89,625.00 18.38 22.69 89,602.31 0.0 REVPRIN2 10/20/94 09:22:14 121 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 9 BALANCE % COL 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3605 L. A. CO PKS/OPEN SPACE 219,729.00 .00 .00 219,729.00 0.0 OTHER 219,729.00 .00 .00 219,729.00 0.0 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND 219,729.00 .00 .00 219,729.00 0.0 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 10 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 10,780.00 359.42 452.10 10,327.90 4.2 REVENUE CONTROL 10,780.00 359.42 452.10 10,327.90 4.2 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 10,780.00 359.42 452.10 10,327.90 4.2 REVPR!N2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) .126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 11 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3120 UTILITY USER TAX 955,418.00 93,274.18 261,260.74 694,157.26 27.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 48,000.00 24,947.51 25,813.72 22,186.28 53.8 REVENUE CONTROL 1,003,418.00 118,221.69 287,074.46 716,343.54 28.6 4X UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 1,003,418.00 118,221.69 287,074.46 716,343.54 28.6 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) .127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3120 UTILITY USER TAX 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME REVENUE CONTROL 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND PAGE 12 BALANCE % COL 1,433,127.00 139,911.33 363,161.71 1,069,965.29 25.3 14,957.00 1,004.15 1,248.16 13,708.84 8.3 1,448,084.00 140,915.48 364,409.87 1,083,674.13 25.2 1,448,084.00 140,915.48 364,409.87 1,083,674.13 25.2 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND PAGE 13 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3117 PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3855 BUS PASSES REVENUE CONTROL PROPOSITION 'A FUND 184,502.00 .00 29,308.00 155,194.00 15.9 4,520.00 161.26 196.77 4,323.23 4.4 • 4,000.00 232.80 513.60 3,486.40 12.8 193,022.00 394.06 30,018.37 163,003.63 15.6 193,022.00 394.06 30,018.37 163,003.63 15.6 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 14 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3118 PROP C LOCAL RETURN FDS 150,096.00 12,991.00 22,727.00 127,369.00 15.1 3121 SUBREGNL.IN 23,000.00 .00 .00 23,000.00 - 0.0 TAXES 173,096.00 12,991.00 22,727.00 150,369.00 13.1 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 5,986.00 320.03 395.55 5,590.45 6.6 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3854 FARES, DIAL A RIDE 11,500.00 .00 .00 11,500.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 190,582.00 13,311.03 23,122.55 167,459.45 12.1 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 190,582.00 13,311.03 23,122.55 167,459.45 12.1 REVPRIN2 10/20/94 09:22:14 .150 GRANTS FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 15 BALANCE % COL 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3539 FORESTRY GRANT 8CA27539 178,600.00 .00 .00 178,600.00 0.0 3540 CA TRANSP COMM-EEMP GRT 321,800.00 .00 .00 321,800.00 - 0.0 3541 LOC TRANSP PARTNER PROG 215,736.00 .00 .00 215,736.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 716,136.00 .00 .00 716,136.00 0.0 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3604 L.A.CO. LOCAL HWY. PROG 335,415.00 .00 .00 335,415.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 1,051,551.00 .00 .00 1,051,551.00 0.0 GRANTS FUND 1,051,551.00 .00 .00 1,051,551.00 0.0 REVPRIN2 10/20/94 09:22:14 .152 AIR QUALITY MNGMNT DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3538 AQMD EMISSION CTL AB276 REVENUE CONTROL AIR QUALITY MNGMNT DIST FUND 684.00 73.18 PAGE 16 BALANCE % COL 87.92 596.08 12.9 21,000.00 .00 5,250.54 15,749.46 25.0 21,684.00 73.18 5,338.46 16,345.54 24.6 21,684.00 73.18 5,338.46 16,345.54 24.6 REVPRIN2 10/20/94 09:22:14 .155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 17 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 54,707.00 .00 .00 54,707.00 0.0 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 1,500.00 .00 783.49 716.51 - 52.2 TAXES 56,207.00 .00 783.49 55,423.51 1.4 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 1,846.00 65.25 81.35 1,764.65 4.4 REVENUE CONTROL 58,053.00 65.25 864.84 57,188.16 1.5 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT FUND 58,053.00 65.25 864.84 57,188.16 1.5 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) .160 SEWER FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 18 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 118,562.00 7,571.56 9,334.99 109,227.01 7.9 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC 10,000.00 .00 .00 10,000.00 0.0 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 . SEWER CONNECTION FEE 250.00 .00 1,333.73 1,083.73- 533.5 3829 SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 652.00 .00 162.75 489.25 25.0 3832 SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 652.00 .00 .00 652.00 0.0 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 1,554.00 .00 1,496.48 57.52 96.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 800,000.00 66,666.67 200,000.01 599,999.99 25.0 REVENUE CONTROL 930,116.00 74,238.23 210,831.48 719,284.52 22.7 SEWER FUND 930,116.00 74,238.23 210,831.48 719,284.52 22.7 w REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3300 3304 FINES & FORFEITURES FORFEITED FUNDS 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME REVENUE CONTROL ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND PAGE 19 BALANCE % COL 75,000.00 .00 5,435.78 69,564.22 7.2 31,217.00 922.58 1,149.34 30,067.66 3.7 • 106,217.00 922.58 6,585.12 99,631.88 6.2 106,217.00 922.58 6,585.12 99,631.88 6.2 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3912 FIRE FLOW FEE REVENUE CONTROL FIRE PROTECTION FUND PAGE 20 BALANCE % COL 19,638.00 912.50 1,125.95 18,512.05 5.7 8,000.00 .00 2,013.50 5,986.50 25.2 27,638.00 912.50 3,139.45 24,498.55 11.4 27,638.00 912.50 3,139.45 24,498.55 11.4 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:22:14 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) .705 INSURANCE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY 8 PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3957 TRANSFER IN -DEPT INS SV REVENUE CONTROL INSURANCE FUND PAGE 21 BALANCE % COL 78.00 28.42 54.93 23.07 70.4 991,482.00 82,624.00 247,872.00 743,610.00 25.0 991,560.00 82,652.42 247,926.93 743,633.07 25.0 991,560.00 82,652.42 247,926.93 743,633.07 25.0 REVPRIN2 10/20/94 09:22:14 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 22 BALANCE % COL REVENUE CONTROL 18,903,921.00 1,236,360.51 3,609,676.53 15,294,244.47 19.1 OTHER 219,729.00 .00 .00 219,729.00 0.0 GRAND TOTALS 19,123,650.00 1,236,360.51 3,609,676.53 15,513,973.47 18.9 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 001 GENERAL FUND PAGE 1 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE X USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 0000 0000-2110 DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 1101 CITY COUNCIL 1101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES M 1101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 18,505.00 1,516.19 4,403.64 .00 14,101.36 23.8 1101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 926.00 .00 .00 .00 926.00 0.0 1101-4112 PART T1ME/TEMPORARY 18,000.00 1,500.00 4,500.00 .00 13,500.00 25.0 1101-4180 RETIREMENT 4,259.00 351.62 1,036.12 .00 3,222.88 24.3 1101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 17,856.00 2,013.44 6,987.81 .00 10,868.19 39.1 1101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 752.00 62.38 185.03 .00 566.97 24.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 60,298.00 5,443.63 17,112.60 .00 43,185.40 28.4 1101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1101-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 1,000.00 95.00 95.00 .00 905.00 9.5 1101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1101-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 18.46 44.70 .00 255.30 14.9 1101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6,000.00 275.66 811.58 1,190.75 3,997.67 33.4 1101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 5,950.00 100.00 3,223.50 .00 2,726.50 54.2 1101-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 5,320.00 390.00 390.00 .00 4,930.00 7.3 1101-4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 750.00 .00 68.68 .00 681.32 9.2 1101-4396 TRSFRS OUT -INS USER CHG 18,450.00 1,537.00 4,611.00 .00 13,839.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 36,770.00 2,321.12 9,149.46 1,190.75 26,429.79 28.1 1101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 CITY COUNCIL 99,068.00 7,859.75 26,357.06 1,190.75 71,520.19 27.8 1121 CITY CLERK 1121-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1121-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 35,310.00 2,965.72 8,614.92 .00 26,695.08 24.4 - 1121-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,766.00 .00 .00 .00 1,766.00 0.0 1121-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 16,956.00 1,412.50 4,237.50 .00 12,718.50 25.0 1121-4180 RETIREMENT 6,766.00 566.76 1,663.73 .00 5,102.27 24.6 1121-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,785.00 469.51 1,872.74 .00 3,912.26 32.4 1121-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 758.00 63.48 186.36 .00 571.64 24.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 67,341.00 5,477.97 - 16,575.25 .00 50,765.75 24.6 1121-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1121-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 22,200.00 .00 110.71 .00 22,089.29 0.5 1121-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1121-4304 TELEPHONE 625.00 42.75 115.50 .00 509.50 18.5 1121-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 2,214.00 135.19 399.82 .00 1,814.18 18.1 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) • PAGE 2 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1121-4315 MEMBERSHIP 250.00 .00 .00 .00 250.00 0.0 1121-4316 TRAINING 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 0.0 1121-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 450.00 .00 .00 .00 450.00 0.0 1121-4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 9,000.00 656.91 656.91 .00 8,343.09 ' 7.3 1121-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 1,868.00 156.00 468.00 .00 1,400.00 25.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 14,707.00 990.85 1,640.23 .00 13,066.77 11.2 1121-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1121-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 24,853.00 .00 .00 .00 24,853.00 0.0 CITY CLERK 129,101.00 6,468.82 18,326.19 .00 110,774.81 14.2 1122 ELECTIONS 1122-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1122-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY_ 1,120.00 .00 .00 .00 1,120.00 0.0 1122-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 85.00 .00 .00 .00 85.00 0.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 1,205.00 .00 .00 .00 1,205.00 0.0 1122-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1122-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT - 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 1122-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 16,000.00 .00 .00 .00 16,000.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 17,500.00 .00 .00 .00 17,500.00 0.0 1122-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1122-4304 TELEPHONE 72.00 .00 - .00 .00 72.00 0.0 1122-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,500.00 .30 120.68 .00 1,379.32 8.0 1122-4316 TRAINING 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 0.0 1122-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 450.00 .00 .00 .00 450.00 0.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2,222.00 .30 120.68 .00 2,101.32 5.4 ELECTIONS 20,927.00 .30 120.68 .00 20,806.32 0.6 1131 CITY ATTORNEY 1131-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1131-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 182,200.00 41,362.98 15,701.31 .00 166,498.69 8.6 1131-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1131-4304 TELEPHONE 250.00 20.02 53.39 .00 196.61 21.4 1131-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 50.00 .00 8.37 .00 41.63 16.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 300.00 20.02 61.76 .00 238.24 20.6 CITY ATTORNEY 182,500.00 41,383.00 15,763.07 .00 166,736.93 8.6 1132 1132-4200 1132-4201 1132-4300 1132-4304 CITY PROSECUTOR CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER TELEPHONE 67,200.00 300.00 5,825.00 11,575.00 .00 55,625.00 17.2 20.02 53.39 .00 246.61 17.8 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 .001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 3 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1132-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 800.00 20.02 53.39 .00 746.61 6.7 CITY PROSECUTOR 68,000.00 5,845.02 11,628.39 .00 56,371.61 17.1 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1141-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 16,068.00 1,339.00 4,017.02 .00 12,050.98 25.0 1141-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 1141-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 804.00 .00 .00 .00 804.00 0.0 1141-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 16,068.00 1,325.50 3,976.50 .00 12,091.50 24.7 1141-4180 RETIREMENT 4,160.00 344.92 1,034.77 .00 3,125.23 24.9 1141-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,932.00 284.33 1,323.12 .00 4,608.88 22.3 1141-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 466.00 38.64 115.92 .00 350.08 24.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 43,498.00 3,332.39 10,467.33 .00 33,030.67 24.1 1141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1141-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 5,258.00 108.27 406.03 .00 4,851.97 7.7 1141-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1141-4304 TELEPHONE 650.00 39.43 105.82 .00 544.18 16.3 1141-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,500.00 94.87 413.43 .00 1,086.57 27.6 1141-4315 MEMBERSHIP 102.00 .00 .00 .00 102.00 0.0 1141-4316 TRAINING 50.00 .00 20.00 .00 30.00 40.0 1141-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 2,563.00 214.00 642.00 .00 1,921.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4,865.00 348.30 1,181.25 .00 3,683.75 24.3 CITY TREASURER 53,621.00 3,788.96 12,054.61 .00 41,566.39 22.5 1201 CITY MANAGER 1201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 117,192.00 9,740.11 29,075.46 .00 88,116.54 24.8 1201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 5,860.00 .00 .00 .00 5,860.00 0.0 1201-4180 RETIREMENT 14,627.00 1,141.26 3,479.32 .00 11,147.68 23.8 1201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 9,435.00 751.38 3,003.20 .00 6,431.80 31.8 1201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,599.00 132.90 396.61 .00 1,202.39 24.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 148,713.00 11,765.65 35,954.59 .00 112,758.41 24.2 1201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1201-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 500.00 11.00 33.00 .00 467.00i 6.6 1201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1201-4304 TELEPHONE 680.00 38.28 132.37 .00 547.63 19.5 1201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,350.00 109.07 255.68 .00 1,094.32 18.9 1201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,275.00 .00 .00 .00 1,275.00 0.0 1201-4316 TRAINING 240.00 276.00 415.00 .00 175.00- 172.9 1201-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1,800.00 195.00 195.00 .00 1,605.00 10.8 1201-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 5,547.00 462.00 1,386.00 .00 4,161.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 10,892.00 1,080.35 2,384.05 .00 8,507.95 21.9 CITY MANAGER 160,105.00 12,857.00 38,371.64 .00 121,733.36 24.0 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 001 GENERAL FUND PAGE 4 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 212,752.00 17,708.72 52,839.42 .00 159,912.58 24.8 1202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 2,090.00 760.86 2,665.86 .00 575.86- 127.6 1202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 10,638.00 3,336.34 5,169.50 .00 5,468.50 48.6 1202-4180 RETIREMENT 27,541.00 2,284.92 6,889.13 .00 20,651.87 25.0 1202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21,259.00 1,744.55 6,675.83 .00 14,583.17 31.4 1202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 699.00 69.46 206.64 .00 492.36 29.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 274,979.00 25,904.85 74,446.38 .00 200,532.62 27.1 1202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1202-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 32,510.00 .00 1,368.80 350.00 30,791.20 5.3 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4304 TELEPHONE 2,300.00 155.42 423.38 .00 1,876.62 18.4 1202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 7,428.00 311.89 2,658.35 .00 4,769.65 35.8 1202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 100.00 .00 18.72 .00 81.28 18.7 1202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 15.00 5.00 5.00 .00 10.00 33.3 1202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 250.00 .00 130.00 .00 120.00 52.0 1202-4316 TRAINING 2,020.00 126.70 1,124.38 .00 895.62 55.7 1202-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 900.00 .00 .00 .00 900.00 0.0 1202-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 10,646.00 887.00 2,661.00 .00 7,985.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 23,659.00 1,486.01 7,020.83 .00 16,638.17 29.7 1202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 140.00 .00 - 204.59 .00 64.59- 146.1 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 331,288.00 27,390.86 83,040.60 350.00 247,897.40 25.2 1203 PERSONNEL 1203-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1203-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 57,279.00 4,173.29 12,853.86 .00 44,425.14 22.4 1203-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,864.00 150.93 150.93 .00 2,713.07 5.3 1203-4180 RETIREMENT 7,415.00 540.24 1,663.94 .00 5,751.06 22.4 1203-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,820.00 345.57 12,206.30 .00 386.30- 103.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 79,378.00 5,210.03 26,875.03 .00 52,502.97 33.9 1203-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1203-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 14,182.00 536.26 1,843.76 .00 12,338.24 13.0 1203-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 15,182.00 536.26 1,843.76 .00 13,338.24 12.1 1203-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1203-4304 TELEPHONE 1,250.00 79.73 194.65 .00 1,055.35 15.6 1203-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,140.00 173.36 515.42 .00 3,624.58 12.4 1203-4315 MEMBERSHIP 550.00 .00 500.00 .00 50.00 90.9 1203-4316 TRAINING 2,175.00 .00 380.00 .00 1,795.00 17.5 1203-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 700.00 .00 .00 .00 700.00 0.0 1203-4320 PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 25,200.00 .00 1,331.00 .00 23,869.00 5.3 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 5 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1203-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 5,368.00 447.00 1,341.00 .00 4,027.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 39,383.00 700.09 4,262.07 .00 35,120.93 10.8 PERSONNEL 133,943.00 6,446.38 32,980.86 .00 100,962.14 24.6 1205 CABLE TV 1205-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES w 1205-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 3,072.00 149.31 298.27 .00 2,773.73 9.7 1205-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 194.00 11.42 22.81 .00 171.19 11.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 3,266.00 160.73 321.08 .00 2,944.92 9.8 1205-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1205-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT .00 1,212.50 1,212.50 .00 1,212.50- *** 1205-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER y 1205-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 250.05 468.27 .00 31.73 93.7 1205-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 109.00 9.00 27.00 .00 82.00 24.8 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 609.00 259.05 495.27 .00 113.73 81.3 CABLE TV 3,875.00 1,632.28 2,028.85 .00 1,846.15 52.4 1206 DATA PROCESSING 1206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 36,372.00 3,031.00 9,093.00 .00 27,279.00 25.0 1206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,818.00 .00 .00 .00 1,818.00 0.0 1206-4180 RETIREMENT 4,708.00 392.36 1,177.08 .00 3,530.92 25.0 1206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,344.00 171.62 686.48 .00 1,657.52 29.3 1206-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 527.00 43.94 131.82 .00 395.18 25.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 45,769.00 3,638.92 11,088.38 .00 34,680.62 24.2 1206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1206-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 66,745.00 838.05 12,679.11 .00 54,065.89 19.0 1206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1206-4304 TELEPHONE 4,221.00 272.19 673.84 .00 3,547.16 16.0 1206-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 2,500.00 30.02 84.59 197.97 2,217.44 11.3 1206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1,500.00 293.73 893.40 .00 606.60 59.6 1206-4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 0.0 1206-4316 TRAINING 2,000.00 .00 .00 .00 2,000.00 0.0 1206-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 3,119.00 260.00 780.00 .00 2,339.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 13,640.00 855.94 2,431.83 197.97 11,010.20 19.3 1206-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1206-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 900.00 .00 272.63 .00 627.37 30.3 1206-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 3,000.00 4,090.61 22,307.78 .00 19,307.78- 743.6 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3,900.00 4,090.61 22,580.41 .00 18,680.41- 579.0 DATA PROCESSING 130,054.00 9,423.52 48,779.73 197.97 81,076.30 37.7 1207 1207-4100 BUSINESS LICENSE PERSONAL SERVICES EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 001 GENERAL FUND PAGE 6 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1207-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 63,434.00 5,282.27 15,796.06 .00 47,637.94 24.9 1207-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 0.0 1207-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,172.00 .00 .00 .00 3,172.00 0.0 1207-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 799.50 2,362.62 .00 2,362.62-• *** 1207-4180 RETIREMENT 8,211.00 683.80 2,032.26 .00 6,178.74 24.8 - 1207-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,271.00 581.27 2,223.43 .00 5,047.57 30.6 1207-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 311.00 89.47 263.39 .00 47.61 84.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 82,599.00 7,436.31 22,677.76 .00 59,921.24 27.5 1207-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1207-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 1,025.00 100.00 119.54 .00 905.46 11.7 1207-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 154.00 .00 .00 .00 154.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 1,179.00 100.00 119.54 .00 1,059.46 10.1 1207-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1207-4304 TELEPHONE 750.00 48.10 130.90 .00 619.10 17.5 1207-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,280.00 662.71 3,639.40 108.25 532.35 87.6 1207-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 175.00 .00 .00 .00 175.00 0.0 1207-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 150.00 .00 .00 .00 150.00 0.0 1207-4315 MEMBERSHIP 40.00 .00 40.00 .00 .00 100.0 1207-4316 TRAINING 1,075.00 65.00 104.50 .00 970.50 9.7 1207-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 344.00 .00 .00 .00 344.00 0.0 1207-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 5,329.00 444.00 1,332.00 .00 3,997.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 12,143.00 1,219.81 --5,246.80 108.25 6,787.95 44.1 BUSINESS LICENSE 95,921.00 8,756.12 28,044.10 108.25 67,768.65 29.3 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 1208-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1208-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 35,352.00 2,945.80 8,837.40 .00 26,514.60 25.0 1208-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,768.00 .00 849.76 .00 918.24 48.1 1208-4180 RETIREMENT 4,576.00 381.34 1,144.01 .00 3,431.99 25.0 1208-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,478.00 198.69 793.23 .00 1,684.77 32.0 1208-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 513.00 42.72 140.48 .00 372.52 27.4 " PERSONAL SERVICES 44,687.00 3,568.55 11,764.88 .00 32,922.12 26.3 1208-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1208-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 27,253.00 635.64 3,781.19 .00 23,471.81 13.9 1208-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1208-4304 TELEPHONE 250.00 20.34 53.98 .00 196.02 21.6 1208-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 38,000.00- 4,115.21- 11,051.79- .00 26,948.21- 29.1 1208-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 1,423.00 119.00 357.00 .00 1,066.00 25.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 36,327.00- 3,975.87- 10,640.81- .00 25,686.19- 29.3 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 35,613.00 228.32 4,905.26 .00 30,707.74 13.8 1213 1213-4100 RETIREMENT PERSONAL SERVICES 4 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.OX OF BUDGET YEAR) .001 GENERAL FUND PAGE 7 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1213-4180 RETIREMENT .00 2,537:63- .00 .00 .00 *** 1214 PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES 1214-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1214-4322 UNCLASSIFIED 36,627.00 .00 .00 .00 36,627.00 0.0 2101 POLICE 2101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 2,274,022.00 199,279.78 566,969.13 .00 1,707,052.87 24.9 2101-4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY .00 14,994.51- 29,989.02- .00 29,989.02 *** 2101-4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 23,055.00 1,660.00 4,840.00 .00 18,215.00 21.0 2101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 43,000.00 18,609.56 51,386.73 .00 8,386.73- 119.5 2101-4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 98,250.00 .00 .00 .00 98,250.00 0.0 2101-4109 COURT TIME 28,140.00 .00 .00 .00 28,140.00 0.0 2101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 115,344.00 14,622.01 53,110.27 .00 62,233.73 46.0 2101-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 15,055.00 1,188.00 3,492.92 .00 11,562.08 23.2 2101-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 9,320.00 632.85 1,847.63 .00 7,472.37 19.8 2101-4118 TRAINING OFFICER 3,500.00 453.08 1,911.96 .00 1,588.04 54.6 2101-4180 RETIREMENT 472,670.00 39,015.30 117,119.16 .00 355,550.84 24.8 2101-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 32,081.00 2,025.20 7,970.40 .00 24,110.60 24.8 2101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 216,549.00 17,299.85 69,433.86 .00 147,115.14 32.1 2101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 18,231.00 1,624.06 4,866.85 .00 13,364.15 26.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 3,349,217.00 281,415.18 852,959.89 .00 2,496,257.11 25.5 2101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2101-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 79,983.00 5,685.50 35,432.07 .00 44,550.93 44.3 2101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 4,300.00 217.00 249.00 .00 4,051.00 5.8 CONTRACT SERVICES 84,283.00 5,902.50 35,681.07 .00 48,601.93 42.3 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2101-4304 TELEPHONE 30,000.00 3,411.93 6,778.68 .00 23,221.32 22.6 2101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 30,759.00 1,567.25 4,651.37 1,673.23 24,434.40 20.6 2101-4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 8,526.00 472.01 1,136.06 .00 7,389.94 13.3 • 2101-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 2,625.00 .00 469.66 .00 2,155.34 17.9 2101-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5,600.00 600.48 1,268.55 .00 4,331.45 22.7 2101-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 17,500.00 1,668.88 5,503.48 .00 11,996.52 31.4 2101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 22,240.00 3,788.68 6,713.25 275.42 15,251.33 31.4 2101-4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 10,000.00 564.30 1,618.85 .00 8,381.15 16.2 2101-4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 3,840.00 680.36 776.36 .00 3,063.64 20.2 2101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 720.00 .00 135.00 .00 585.00 18.8 2101-4316 TRAINING 12,439.00 3,045.51 3,632.51 .00 8,806.49 29.2 2101-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 3,150.00 .00 .00 .00 3,150.00 0.0 2101-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 397,950.00 33,163.00 99,489.00 .00 298,461.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 545,349.00 48,962.40 132,172.77 1,948.65 411,227.58 24.6 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) .001 GENERAL FUND PAGE 8 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 4,674.00 .00 .00 226.24 4,447.76 4.8 2101-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 32,200.00 .00 .00 .00 32,200.00 0.0 2101-5403 VEHICLES 19,722.00 .00 .00 .00 19,722.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 56,596.00 .00 .00 226.24 56,369.76 0.4 2101-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 2101-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 10,720.00 .00 .00 .00 10,720.00 0.0 POLICE 4,046,165.00 336,280.08 1,020,813.73 2,174.89 3,023,176.38 25.3 2201 - FIRE 2201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 899,213.00 72,598.10 207,517.75 .00 691,695.25 23.1 2201-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 78,624.00 6,050.93 29,097.81 .00 49,526.19 37.0 2201-4108 FLSA OVERTIME 48,743.00 3,275.96 20,662.16 .00 28,080.84 42.4 2201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 44,960.00 .00 38,151.74 .00 6,808.26 84.9 2201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 410.00 1,076.23 .00 1,076.23- *** 2201-4119 FITNESS INCENTIVE 10,800.00 .00 .00 .00 10,800.00 0.0 2201-4180_ RETIREMENT 207,809.00 17,356.15 50,448.68 .00 157,360.32 24.3 2201-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 8,200.00 1,614:31 3,336.51 .00 4,863.49 40.7 2201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 134,477.00 11,054.00 31,572.10 .00 102,904.90 23.5 2201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 4,954.00 515.79 1,513.71 .00 3,440.29 30.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 1,437,780.00 112,875.24 383,376.69 .00 1,054,403.31 26.7 2201-4200 2201-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 20,911.00 1,929.00 12,522.35 .00 8,388.65 59.9 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2201-4304 TELEPHONE 2,785.00 279.15 581.50 .00 2,203.50 20.9 2201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,600.00 60.11 644.66 .00 955.34 40.3 2201-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,000.00 312.32 998.57 .00 3,001.43 25.0 2201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,600.00 174.25 556.33 .00 2,043.67 21.4 2201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 3,200.00 .00 504.37 2,351.55 344.08 89.2 2201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 2201-4316 TRAINING 3,370.00 180.00 210.00 .00 3,160.00 6.2 2201-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 108,766.00 9,064.00 27,192.00 .00 81,574.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 127,321.00 10,069.83 30,687.43 2,351.55 94,282.02 25.9 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 800.00 .00 170.00 .00 630.00 21.3 2201-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 5,873.00 1,161.06 1,161.06 .00 4,711.94 19.8 2201-5403 VEHICLES 20,000.00 .00 .00 19,241.44 758.56 96.2 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 26,673.00 1,161.06 1,331.06 19,241.44 6,100.50 77.1 2201-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 2201-5602 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 18,500.00 .00 .00 .00 18,500.00 0.0 FIRE 1,631,185.00 126,035.13 427,917.53 21,592.99 1,181,674.48 27.6 2401 2401-4100 ANIMAL CONTROL PERSONAL SERVICES EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 9 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2401-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 71,897.00 5,722.56 17,455.41 .00 54,441.59 24.3 2401-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,400.00 120.13 134.77 .00 1,265.23 9.6 2401-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,302.00 280.38 1,051.47 .00 2,250.53 31.8 2401-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 900.00 87.56 293.38 .00 606.62 - 32.6 2401-4180 RETIREMENT 9,897.00 809.65 2,472.82 .00 7,424.18 25.0 M 2401-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 697.00 58.08 174.24 .00 522.76 25.0 2401-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,305.00 495.14 1,986.75 .00 4,318.25 31.5 2401-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 530.00 37.29 119.71 .00 410.29 22.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 94,928.00 7,610.79 23,688.55 .00 71,239.45 25.0 2401-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2401-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 1,000.00 11.00 686.08 .00 313.92 68.6 2401-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 4,200.00 314.14 314.14 .00 3,885.86 7.5 CONTRACT SERVICES 5,200.00 325.14 1,000.22 .00 4,199.78 19.2 2401-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2401-4304 TELEPHONE 700.00 40.18 110.61 .00 589.39 15.8 2401-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 600.00 40.59 41.46 113.66 444.88 25.9 2401-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 400.00 10.51 10.51 .00 389.49 2.6 2401-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,300.00 104.38 365.06 .00 934.94 28.1 2401-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,800.00 6.00 9.63 .00 1,790.37 0.5 2401-4315 MEMBERSHIP 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 0.0 2401-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 8,457.00 705.00 2,115.00 .00 6,342.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 13,357.00 906.66 -2,652.27 113.66 10,591.07 20.7 ANIMAL CONTROL 113,485.00 8,842.59 27,341.04 113.66 86,030.30 24.2 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE 2701-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2701-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 23,238.00 1,911.48 5,734.44 .00 17,503.56 24.7 2701-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 41.65 844.73 .00 844.73- *** 2701-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,162.00 .00 .00 .00 1,162.00 0.0 2701-4180 RETIREMENT 5,387.00 442.69 1,337.48 .00 4,049.52 24.8 2701-4187 UNIFORMS .00 12.48 37.44 .00 37.44- *** 2701-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,264.00 309.21 902.03 .00 2,361.97 27.6 2701-4189 FICA 174.00 14.94 48.65 .00 125.35 28.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 33,225.00 2,732.45 8,904.77 .00 24,320.23 26.8 2701-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2701-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2,343.00 .00 2,343.13 .00 .13- 100.0 2701-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2701-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 400.00 .00 .00 .00 400.00 0.0 2701-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 2701-4316 TRAINING 750.00 .00 20.00 .00 730.00 2.7 2701-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 2,760.00 230.00 690.00 .00 2,070.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4,410.00 230.00 710.00 .00 3,700.00 16.1 2701-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 001 GENERAL FUND PAGE 10 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2701-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 950.00 .00 .00 .00 950.00 0.0 CIVIL DEFENSE 40,928.00 2,962.45 11,957.90 .00 28,970.10 29.2 3101 MEDIANS 3101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES _ 3101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 40,058.00 2,513.82 6,788.38 .00 33,269.62 16.9 • 3101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 200.00 12.19 12.19 .00 187.81 6.1 3101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,002.00 19.82 92.48 .00 1,909.52 4.6 3101-4180 RETIREMENT 5,186.00 325.44 901.34 .00 4,284.66 17.4 3101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,449.00 282.33 1,438.08 .00 5,010.92 22.3 3101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 275.00 25.62 65.39 .00 209.61 23.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 54,170.00 3,179.22 9,297.86 .00 44,872.14 17.2 3101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3101-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 3,900.00 .00 .00 .00 3,900.00 0.0 3101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 1,365.00 .00 .00 .00 1,365.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 5,265.00 .00 .00 .00 5,265.00 0.0 3101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3101-4303 UTILITIES 9,985.00 1,927.15 3,014.66 .00 6,970.34 30.2 3101-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3,200.00 40.77 102.69 487.93 2,609.38 18.5 3101-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 900.00 25.42 142.03 .00 757.97 15.8 3101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 3101-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 5,421.00 452.00 -1,356.00 .00 4,065.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 20,006.00 2,445.34 4,615.38 487.93 14,902.69 25.5 MEDIANS 79,441.00 5,624.56 13,913.24 487.93 65,039.83 18.1 3103 STREET MAINTENANCE 3103-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3103-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 70,020.00 8,629.64 24,768.34 .00 45,251.66 35.4 3103-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 850.00 17.71 26.63 .00 823.37 3.1 3103-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,302.00 19.82 3,141.97 .00 3,160.03 49.9 3103-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 .00 1,629.75 .00 1,629.75- *** '" 3103-4180 RETIREMENT 9,063.00 1,117.13 3,193.84 .00 5,869.16 35.2 3103-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,749.00 1,062.51 4,212.61 .00 3,536.39 54.4 3103-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 539.00 81.08 353.09 .00 185.91 65.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 94,523.00 10,927.89 37,326.23 .00 57,196.77 39.5 3103-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3103-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 154,405.00 16,490.76 30,798.11 375.00 123,231.89 20.2 3103-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3103-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 7,352.00 1,355.02 1,752.20 .00 5,599.80 23.8 3103-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,720.00 145.11 375.69 .00 1,344.31 21.8 3103-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 5,211.00 85.27 425.57 .00 4,785.43 8.2 3103-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 54,503.00 4,542.00 13,626.00 .00 40,877.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 68,786.00 6,127.40 16,179.46 .00 52,606.54 23.5 STREET MAINTENANCE 317,714.00 33,546.05 84,303.80 375.00 233,035.20 26.7 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 _001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 11 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3104-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 79,422.00 5,645.13 16,988.26 .00 62,433.74 21.4 3104-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 0.0 3104-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,128.00 19.82 3,216.26 .00 911.74 77.9 3104-4180 RETIREMENT 10,281.00 730.77 2,192.36 .00 8,088.64 - 21.3 3104-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,111.00 748.50 3,015.55 .00 3,095.45 49.3 3104-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 199.00 10.56 32.20 .00 166.80 16.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 100,341.00 7,154.78 25,444.63 .00 74,896.37 25.4 - 3104-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3104-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 21,000.00 660.00 1,335.00 .00 19,665.00 6.4 3104-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 500.00 442.93 442.93 .00 57.07 88.6 CONTRACT SERVICES 21,500.00 1,102.93 1,777.93 .00 19,722.07 8.3 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4303 UTILITIES 6,910.00 .00 1,337.20 .00 5,572.80 19.4 3104-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 17,750.00 105.52 1,834.73 479.05 15,436.22 13.0 3104-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,000.00 60.27 226.47 .00 773.53 22.6 3104-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,000.00 .00 21.26 .00 978.74 2.1 3104-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 9,834.00 820.00 2,460.00 .00 7,374.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 36,494.00 985.79 5,879.66 479.05 30,135.29 17.4 TRAFFIC SAFETY 158,335.00 9,243.50 33,102.22 479.05 124,753.73 21.2 4101 PLANNING 4101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 146,252.00 11,511.14 34,951.92 .00 111,300.08 23.9 4101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 0.0 4101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 7,312.00 167.82 167.82 .00 7,144.18 2.3 4101-4180 RETIREMENT 22,067.00 1,759.00 5,394.59 .00 16,672.41 24.4 4101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21,250.00 1,139.17 4,369.76 .00 16,880.24 20.6 4101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,472.00 140.28 417.66 .00 1,054.34 28.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 198,453.00 14,717.41 45,301.75 .00 153,151.25 22.8 4101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4101-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 6,000.00 225.00 740.31 .00 5,259.69 12.3 4101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4101-4304 TELEPHONE 2,100.00 124.83 348.26 .00 1,751.74 16.6 4101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6,000.00 200.71 688.46 .00 5,311.54 11.5 4101-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 0.0 4101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 4101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 480.00 .00 .00 .00 480.00 0.0 4101-4316 TRAINING 1,000.00 55.00 55.00 .00 945.00 5.5 4101-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1,400.00 .00 .00 .00 1,400.00 0.0 4101-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 9,894.00 824.00 2,472.00 .00 7,422.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 21,574.00 1,204.54 3,563.72 .00 18,010.28 16.5 PLANNING 226,027.00 16,146.95 49,605.78 .00 176,421.22 21.9 4102 4102-4200 PLANNING COMMISSION CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) .001 GENERAL FUND PAGE 12 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4102-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 4,830.00 97.50 331.00 .00 4,499.00 6.9 4102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4102-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 3,500.00 167.58 351.88 .00 3,148.12 ' 10.1 PLANNING COMMISSION 8,330.00 265.08 682.88 .00 7,647.12 8.2 4201 BUILDING 4201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/M1SC 168,934.00 10,369.92 32,194.09 .00 136,739.91 19.1 4201-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 250.00 .00 .00 .00 250.00 0.0 4201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 8,446.00 .00 .00 .00 8,446.00 0.0 4201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 799.50 2,362.63 .00 2,362.63- *** 4201-4180 RETIREMENT 21,472.00 1,342.40 4,111.08 .00 17,360.92 19.1 4201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS_ 21,467.00 1,288.21 4,699.34 .00 16,767.66 21.9 4201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,357.00 173.35 518.88 .00 1,838.12 22.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 222,926.00 13,973.38 43,886.02 .00 179,039.98 19.7 4201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 26,040.00 730.00 1,208.63 -.00 24,831.37 4.6 4201-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 700.00 100.00 424.00 .00 276.00 60.6 CONTRACT SERVICES 26,740.00 830.00 1,632.63 .00 25,107.37 6.1 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4304 TELEPHONE 3,830.00 208.20 560.58 .00 3,269.42 14.6 4201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9,575.00 443.02 776.42 .00 8,798.58 8.1 4201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,040.00 33.73 108.52 .00 931.48 10.4 4201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,000.00 572.58 1,015.98 .00 .15.98- 101.6 4201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 4201-4316 TRAINING 3,950.00 250.14 427.14 .00 3,522.86 10.8 4201-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 24,217.00 2,018.00 6,054.00 .00 18,163.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 44,112.00 3,525.67 8,942.64 .00 35,169.36 20.3 4201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 100.00 32.46 32.46 .00 67.54 32.5 BUILDING 293,878.00 18,361.51 54,493.75 .00 239,384.25 18.5 4202 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN 4202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 41,290.00 4,118.39 12,010.89 .00 29,279.11 29.1 4202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 200.00 8.85 8.85 .00 191.15 4.4 4202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,168.00 19.82 313.83 .00 1,854.17 14.5 4202-4180 RETIREMENT 5,345.00 533.12 1,457.48 .00 3,887.52 27.3 4202-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 6,225.00 527.20 984.35 .00 5,240.65 15.8 4202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,991.00 473.76 1,768.90 .00 3,222.10 35.4 4202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,144.00 55.17 159.88 .00 984.12 14.0 PERSONAL SERVICES 61,363.00 5,736.31 16,704.18 .00 44,658.82 27.2 4202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 13 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4202-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 1,970.00 110.00 546.10 .00 1,423.90 27.7 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4304 TELEPHONE 5,800.00 353.19 936.19 .00 4,863.81 16.1 4202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9,400.00 482.76 2,061.75 .00 7,338.25 21.9 4202-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 115.00 .00 .00 .00 115.00 0.0 4202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 600.00 19.91 121.83 .00 478.17 20.3 4202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,363.00 5.00 100.36 .00 2,262.64 4.2 4202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,000.00 .00 105.00 .00 895.00 10.5 4202-4316 TRAINING 3,200.00 313.00 1,419.23 .00 1,780.77 44.4 4202-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1,000.00 195.00 195.00 .00 805.00 19.5 4202-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 71,797.00 5,983.00 17,949.00 .00 53,848.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 95,275.00 7,351.86 22,888.36 .00 72,386.64 24.0 4202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 2,128.00 .00 .00 .00 2,128.00 0.0 4202-5402 EQUIP MORE THAN $500 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3,628.00 .00 .00 .00 3,628.00 0.0 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN 162,236.00 13,198.17 40,138.64 .00 122,097.36 24.7 4204 BUILDING MAINT 4204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 127,866.00 8,927.88 26,786.44 .00 101,079.56 20.9 4204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 400.00 89.81 181.71 .00 218.29 45.4 4204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,394.00 .00 11,035.18 .00 4,641.18- 172.6 4204-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 4204-4180 RETIREMENT 16,552.00 1,155.72 3,467.52 .00 13,084.48 20.9 4204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 22,441.00 1,269.00 5,532.77 .00 16,908.23 24.7 4204-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 386.00 9.38 27.59 .00 358.41 7.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 174,039.00 11,451.79 47,031.21 .00 127,007.79 27:0 4204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4204-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 19,000.00 2,750.00 3,306.00 .00 15,694.00 17.4 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4303 UTILITIES 116,996.00 1,845.90 21,982.82 .00 95,013.18 18.8 4204-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 29,500.00 1,606.41 2,662.13 686.87 26,151.00 11.4 4204-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,850.00 53.14 210.29 .00 1,639.71 11.4 4204-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,200.00 48.47 101.97 .00 1,098.03 8.5 4204-4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 2,850.00 56.45 674.89 .00 2,175.11 23.7 4204-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 62,038.00 5,170.00 15,510.00 .00 46,528.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 214,434.00 8,780.37 41,142.10 686.87 172,605.03 19.5 BUILDING MAINT 407,473.00 22,982.16 91,479.31 686.87 315,306.82 22.6 4205 4205-4100 EQUIPMENT SERVICE PERSONAL SERVICES EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 14 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4205-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 80,959.00 6,802.70 20,411.96 .00 60,547.04 25.2 4205-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 100.00 8.86 8.86 .00 91.14 8.9 4205-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,048.00 .00 221.33 .00 3,826.67 5.5 4205-4180 RETIREMENT 10,480.00 880.60 2,642.36 .00 7,837.64 . 25.2 4205-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10,431.00 836.03 3,285.38 .00 7,145.62 31.5 4205-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 544.00 46.79 139.67 .00 404.33 25.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 106,562.00 8,574.98 26,709.56 .00 79,852.44 25.1 4205-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4205-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 7,540.00 600.00 600.00 .00 6,940.00 8.0 4205-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 3,328.00 .00 .00 .00 3,328.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 10,868.00 600.00 600.00 .00 10,268.00 5.5 4205-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4205-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5,900.00 236.04 1,155.38 .00 4,744.62 19.6 4205-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,000.00 783.45 856.75 .00 1,143.25 42.8 4205-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,500.00 317.51 401.89 .00 1,098.11 26.8 4205-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 11,007.00 917.00 2,751.00 .00 8,256.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 20,407.00 2;254.00 5,165.02 .00 15,241.98 25.3 - EQUIPMENT SERVICE 137,837.00 11,428.98 32,474.58 .00 105,362.42 23.6 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/M1SC 173,928.00 14,195.56 43,266.49 .00 130,661.51 24.9 4601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 8,678.00 485.86 1,774.53 .00 6,903.47 20.4 4601-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 64,930.00 5,460.46 21,391.47 .00 43,538.53 32.9 4601-4180 RETIREMENT 24,189.00 2,058.95 6,108.38 .00 18,080.62 25.3 4601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 18,075.00 1,510.08 5,670.05 .00 12,404.95 31.4 4601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 5,517.00 335.24 1,504.75 .00 4,012.25 27.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 295,317.00 24,046.15 79,715.67 .00 215,601.33 27.0 4601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4601-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 8,125.00 2,143.07- 461.69- 403.81 8,182.88 0.7-• 4601-4221 CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 77,070.00 9,774.30 11,599.80 .00 65,470.20 15.1 CONTRACT SERVICES 85,195.00 7,631.23 11,138.11 403.81 73,653.08 13.5 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4302 ADVERTISING 13,800.00 3,247.50 4,952.44 .00 8,847.56 35.9 4601-4304 TELEPHONE 3,000.00 193.28 469.48 .00 2,530.52 15.6 4601-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 8,000.00 342.52 2,365.16 .00 5,634.84 29.6 4601-4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 8,000.00 523.89 1,944.69 118.18 5,937.13 25.8 4601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 750.00 80.06 150.68 .00 599.32 20.1 4601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 350.00 8.00 231.15 .00 118.85 66.0 4601-4315 MEMBERSHIP 700.00 135.00 135.00 .00 565.00 19.3 4601-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 2,000.00 195.00 195.00 .00 1,805.00 9.8 4601-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 20,261.00 1,688.00 5,064.00 .00 15,197.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 56,861.00 6,413.25 15,507.60 118.18 41,235.22 27.5 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 437,373.00 38,090.63 106,361.38 521.99 330,489.63 24.4 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 001 GENERAL FUND PAGE 15 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 6101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 52,736.00 5,481.65 15,676.32 .00 37,059.68 29.7 6101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 300.00 42.10 42.10 .00 257.90 14.0 6101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,636.00 .00 442.70 .00 2,193.30 16.8 6101-4180 RETIREMENT 6,827.00 709.63 2,037.98 .00 4,789.02 ^ 29.9 6101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,192.00 622.57 2,343.72 .00 4,848.28 32.6 6101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 313.00 54.12 148.12 .00 164.88 47.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 70,004.00 6,910.07 20,690.94 .00 49,313.06 29.6 6101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 6101-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 120,027.00 9,093.00 18,186.00 .00 101,841.00 15.2 6101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 6,000.00 .00 500.00 .00 5,500.00 8.3 CONTRACT SERVICES 126,027.00 9,093.00 18,686.00 .00 107,341.00 14.8 6101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6101-4303 UTILITIES 71,300.00 12,121.04 22,818.59 .00 48,481.41 32.0 6101-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 20.02 59.10 .00 240.90 19.7 6101-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 8,500.00 1,150.29 2,615.83 .00 5,884.17 30.8 6101-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,400.00 73.76 227.37 .00 1,172.63 16.2 6101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,500.00 347.23 347.23 .00 1,152.77 23.1 6101-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 35,872.00 2,989.00 8,967.00 .00 26,905.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 118,872.00 16,701.34 35,035.12 .00 83,836.88 29.5 PARKS 314,903.00 32,704.41 74,412.06 .00 240,490.94 23.6 8145 UTILITY UNDERGROUND 8145-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8145-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8600 GROUNDS 8608 PUB WKS YARD RELOCATE & CONSTR 8608-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8608-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE 8621 TELEPHONE SYSTEM 8621-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8621-4201 TELEPHONE SYSTEM EXPENDITURE CONTROL OTHER GENERAL FUND 4,500.00 .00 1,800.00 .00 2,700.00 40.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 38,250.00 .00 .00 .00 38,250.00 0.0 60,000.00 .00 .00 .00 60,000.00 0.0 9,880,203.00 805,254.95 2,393,198.88 28,279.35 7,458,724.77 24.5 78,500.00 .00 .00 .00 78,500.00 0.0 9,958,703.00 805,254.95 2,393,198.88 28,279.35 7,537,224.77 24.3 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING DISTRICT PAGE 16 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 159,300.00 13,275.00 39,825.00 .00 119,475.00 - 25.0 2601 STREET LIGHTING 2601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 112,810.00 10,026.29 29,885.53 .00 82,924.47 26.5 2601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 200.00 8.85 9.34 .00 190.66 4.7 2601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 5,640.00 39.63 3,939.49 .00 1,700.51 69.8 2601-4180 RETIREMENT 14,603.00 1,297.95 3,876.41 .00 10,726.59 26.5 2601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 15,516.00 1,313.34 5,168.47 .00 10,347.53 33.3 2601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,021.00 96.26 285.22 .00 735.78 27.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 149,790.00 12,782.32 43,164.46 .00 106,625.54 28.8 2601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2601-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 3,037.00 76.15 216.15 .00 2,820.85 7.1 2601-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 17,975.00 442.93 442.93 .00 17,532.07 2.5 CONTRACT SERVICES 21,012.00-- 519.08 659.08 .00 20,352.92 3.1 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4303 UTILITIES 150,075.00 11,564.99 23,317.46 .00 126,757.54 15.5 2601-4304 TELEPHONE 250.00 .00 5.68 .00 244.32 2.3 2601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 9,500.00 810.55 1,080.12 8.35 8,411.53 11.5 2601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,500.00 104.48 366.54 .00 1,133.46 24.4 2601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,800.00 239.12 239.12 .00 2,560.88 8.5 2601-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 10,603.00 884.00 2,652.00 .00 7,951.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 174,728.00 13,603.14 27,660.92 8.35 147,058.73 15.8 2601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2601-5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $50 120.00 .00 .00 .00 120.00 0.0 2601-5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 1,250.00 .00 .00 .00 1,250.00 0.0 2601-5403 VEHICLES 54,750.00 .00 .00 .00 54,750.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 56,120.00 .00 .00 .00 56,120.00 0.0 STREET LIGHTING 401,650.00 26,904.54 71,484.46 8.35 330,157.19 17.8 8145 UTILITY UNDERGROUND 8145-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8145-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC .00 510.33 1,172.49 .00 1,172.49- *** 8145-4180 RETIREMENT .00 66.06 125.42 .00 125.42- *** 8145-4189 FICA .00 7.40 17.00 .00 17.00- *** PERSONAL SERVICES .00 583.79 1,314.91 .00 1,314.91- *** 8145-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8145-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES/PRIVATE 2,900.00 13.00 13.00 .00 2,887.00 0.4 8145-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 .105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING DISTRICT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.OX OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 17 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8145-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES UTILITY UNDERGROUND 100.00 78.22 78.22 .00 21.78 78.2 3,000.00 675.01 1,406.13 .00 1,593.87 46.9 8146 MEDIAN UPGRADE 8146-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8146-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC .00 .00 384.63 .00 384.63- *** 8146-4189 FICA .00 .00 5.58 .00 5.58- *** PERSONAL SERVICES .00 .00 390.21 .00 390.21- *** 8146-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8146-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES/PRIVATE 35,000.00 .00 .00 .00 35,000.00 0.0 MEDIAN UPGRADE 35,000.00 .00 390.21 .00 34,609.79 1.1 8201 LT CONV/INSTALL 8201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 8201-5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSET 10,000.00 74.80 74.80 .00 9,925.20 0.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 572,700.00 40,929.35 113,180.60 8.35 459,511.05 19.8 OTHER 36,250.00 .00 .00 .00 36,250.00 0.0 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING DISTRICT 608,950.00 40,929.35 113,180.60 8.35 495,761.05 18.6 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 18 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 2,567.00 213.92 641.76 .00 1,925.24 25.0 3301 DNTWN ENHANCEMENT COMM 3301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 25,670.00 2,298.20 6,706.71 .00 18,963.29 26.1 - 3301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,284.00 59.45 277.48 .00 1,006.52 21.6 3301-4180 RETIREMENT 3,323.00 297.38 868.04 .00 2,454.96 26.1 3301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,204.00 292.20 1,128.73 .00 2,075.27 35.2 3301-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 372.00 34.78 102.84 .00 269.16 27.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 33,853.00 2,982.01 9,083.80 .00 24,769.20 26.8 3301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3301-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 72,559.00 4,532.14 14,636.26 .00 57,922.74 20.2 3301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3301-4302 ADVERTISING 20,348.00 380.00 2,307.71 1,500.00 16,540.29 18.7 3301-4304 TELEPHONE 200.00 16.65 49.95 .00 150.05 25.0 3301-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,200.00 11.94 129.38 .00 1,070.62 10.8 3301-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 635.00 53.00 159.00 .00 476.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 22,383.00 461.59 2,646.04 1,500.00 18,236.96 18.5 3301-4900 DEPRECIATION 3301-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 3301-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS 1,200.00 .00 .00 .00 1,200.00 0.0 DEPRECIATION 1,700.00 .00 .00 .00 1,700.00 0.0 DNTWN ENHANCEMENT COMM 130,495.00 7,975.74 26,366.10 1,500.00 102,628.90 21.4 8160 DWNTN EMPLOYMENT 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES/PRIVATE 120,000.00 27.25 27.25 .00 119,972.75 0.0 - 8701 CITY PARKING LOT IMPROV 8701-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8701-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 20,000.00 .00 .00 .00 20,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 273,062.00 8,216.91 - 27,035.11 1,500.00 244,526.89 10.5 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 273,062.00 8,216.91 27,035.11 1,500.00 244,526.89 10.5 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 110 PARKING FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 19 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1204 FINANCE CASHIER 1204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 174,541.00 14,257.06 42,344.25 .00 132,196.75 24.3 1204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,000.00 7.01 10.51 .00 989.49 1.1 y 1204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 8,728.00 306.57 1,003.82 .00 7,724.18 11.5 1204-4180 RETIREMENT 22,859.00 1,861.30 5,564.26 .00 17,294.74 24.3 1204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 19,953.00 1,729.11 6,855.59 .00 13,097.41 34.4 1204-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,221.00 100.80 301.52 .00 919.48 24.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 228,302.00 18,261.85 56,079.95 .00 172,222.05 24.6 1204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1204-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 19,774.00 416.70 554.64 .00 19,219.36 2.8 1204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1204-4304 TELEPHONE 2,300.00 155.72 411.46 .00 1,888.54 17.9 1204-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 25,234.00 292.70 1,159.03 .00 24,074.97 4.6 1204-4315 MEMBERSHIP 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 0.0 1204-4316 TRAINING 3,552.00 .00 .00 .00 3,552.00 0.0 1204-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 1204-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 6,885.00 574.00 1,722.00 .00 5,163.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 38,571.00 1,022.42 3,292.49 .00 35,278.51 8.5 FINANCE CASHIER 286,647.00 19,700.97 59,927.08 .00 226,719.92 20.9 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 978,754.00 81,562.83 244,688.49 .00 734,065.51 25.0 3302 PARKING ENFORCEMENT 3302-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3302-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 321,463.00 23,845.22 72,939.46 .00 248,523.54 22.7 3302-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 7,000.00 683.00 1,216.44 .00 5,783.56 17.4 3302-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 16,074.00 7,500.17 9,988.56 .00 6,085.44 62.1 ' 3302-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 59,140.00 7,959.48 23,795.89 .00 35,344.11 40.2 3302-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4,000.00 341.35 1,025.71 .00 2,974.29 25.6 3302-4180 RETIREMENT 48,965.00 3,724.03 11,430.06 .00 37,534.94 23.3 3302-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 4,500.00 168.19 510.57 .00 3,989.43 11.3 3302-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 38,691.00 3,834.39 14,944.01 .00 23,746.99 38.6 3302-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 5,053.00 656.08 1,827.70 .00 3,225.30 36.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 504,886.00 48,711.91 137,678.40 .00 367,207.60 27.3 3302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3302-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 1,140.00 16.54 105.54 .00 1,034.46 9.3 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4304 TELEPHONE 3,000.00 189.71 462.74 .00 2,537.26 15.4 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 110 PARKING FUND PAGE 20 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3302-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 22,832.00 127.97 6,364.67 .00 16,467.33 27.9 3302-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 3,000.00 239.50 718.50 .00 2,281.50 24.0 3302-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 5,000.00 5.12 27.37 .00 4,972.63 0.5 3302-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 6,000.00 279.58 1,170.66 .00 4,829.34 . 19.5 3302-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 8,000.00 139.88 766.90 .00 7,233.10 9.6 3302-4315 MEMBERSHIP 75.00 .00 .00 .00 75.00 0.0 3302-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 43,943.00 3,662.00 10,986.00 .00 32,957.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 91,850.00 4,643.76 20,496.84 .00 71,353.16 22.3 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 6,000.00 .00 .00 .00 6,000.00 0.0 3302-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 11,000.00 .00 .00 .00 11,000.00 0.0 3302-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS 560.00 .00 .00 .00 560.00 0.0 DEPRECIATION 17,560.00 .00 .00 .00 17,560.00 0.0 3302-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3302-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 3302-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 8,100.00 .00 .00 .00 8,100.00 0.0 3302-5403 VEHICLES "21,068.00 .00 21,067.50 .00 .50 100.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 29,668.00 .00 21,067.50 .00 8,600.50 71.0 PARKING ENFORCEMENT 645,104.00 53,372.21 179,348.28 .00 465,755.72 27.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL PARKING FUND 1,910,505.00 154,636.01 483,963.85 .00 1,426,541.15 25.3 1,910,505.00 154,636.01 483,963.85 .00 1,426,541.15 25.3 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) .115 STATE GAS TAX FUND PAGE 21 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1219 ADMINISTRATIVE CHGS 1219-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1219-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 1,167.00 26.87 26.87 .00 1,140.13 ' 2.3 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 434,391.00 36,199.25 108,597.75 .00 325,793.25 25.0 8137 - VALLEY ARDMORE 8137-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8137-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 66,500.00 .00 .00 .00 66,500.00 0.0 8141 STREET REHAB _ 8141-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8141-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 30,928.00 .00 972.87 .00 29,955.13 3.1 8141-4180 RETIREMENT 4,004.00 .00 234.31 .00 3,769.69 5.9 8141-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,175.00 .00 2.01 .00 3,172.99 0.1 8141-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 448.00 .00 14.11 .00 433.89 3.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 38,555.00 .00 1,223.30 .00 37,331.70 3.2 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 83,739.00 .00 .00 .00 83,739.00 0.0 STREET REHAB 122,294.00 .00 -1,223.30 .00 121,070.70 1.0 8142 SIDEWALK REPAIR 8142-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8142-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 10,000.00 .00 .00 .00 10,000.00 0.0 8144 STRAND WALL 8144-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8144-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC .00 .00 1,102.60 .00 1,102.60- *** 8144-4180 RETIREMENT .00 .00 148.76 .00 148.76- *** 8144-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 29.73 .00 29.73- *** 8144-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS .00 .00 12.38 .00 12.38- *** PERSONAL SERVICES .00 .00 1,293.47 .00 1,293.47- *** 8144-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8144-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 8,642.00 .00 .00 .00 8,642.00 0.0 8144-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8144-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .00 70.56 281.61 .00 281.61- *** STRAND WALL 8,642.00 70.56 1,575.08 .00 7,066.92 18.2 8147 HANDICAP CURBS 8147-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 22 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8147-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 6,769.00 .00 .00 .00 6,769.00 0.0 8178 CTR MONUMENTS & ELEVATIONS 8178-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8178-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 10,000.00 .00 .00 .00 10,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 659,763.00 36,296.68 111,423.00 .00 548,340.00 16.9 STATE GAS TAX FUND 659,763.00 36,296.68 111,423.00 .00 548,340.00 16.9 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 23 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1219 ADMINISTRATIVE CHGS 1219-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1219-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 10.00 .52 .52 .00 9.48 • 5.2 8141 STREET REHAB 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 89,299.00 .00 .00 .00 89,299.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 89,309.00 .52 .52 .00 89,308.48 0.0 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 89,309.00 .52 .52 .00 89,308.48 0.0 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 121 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 24 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8515 SO SCHOOL PARK 8515-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8515-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES/PRIVATE 219,729.00 .00 .00 .00 219,729.00 - 0.0 OTHER 219,729.00 .00 .00 .00 219,729.00 0.0 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND 219,729.00 .00 .00 .00 219,729.00 0.0 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 25 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1219 ADMINISTRATIVE CHGS 1219-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1219-4201 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 8506 VAR PARK IMPROVEMENTS 8506-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8506-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 8508 PARK IRRIGATION 8508-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8508-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 8515 SO SCHOOL PARK 8515-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8515-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 8523 BILTMORE SITE 8523-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8523-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 8604 VAR BLDG IMPROV 8604-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8604-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVAT 8616 CLARK BLDG EARTHQK REINFORCE 8616-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8616-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT EXPENDITURE CONTROL PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 351.00 11.47 11.47 .00 339.53 - 3.3 12,000.00 10,000.00 94,002.00 59,200.00 15,000.00 23,181.00 213,734.00 213,734.00 .00 .00 .00 12,000.00 0.0 .00 .00 .00 10,000.00 0.0 8,869.78 8,869.78 .00 85,132.22 9.4 .00 .00 .00 59,200.00 0.0 .00 .00 .00 15,000.00 0.0 49.15 49.15 .00 23,131.85 0.2 8,930.40 8,930.40 .00 204,803.60 4:2 8,930.40 8,930.40 .00 204,803.60 4.2 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 26 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8514 ATSF R -R -O -W PURCHASE 8514-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8514-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 8514-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 8514-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS ATSF R -R -O -W PURCHASE EXPENDITURE CONTROL 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 2,200.00 .00 .00 .00 2,200.00 - 0.0 613,935.00 616,135.00 616,135.00 616,135.00 .00 495,359.59 .00 118,575.41 80.7 .00 495,359.59 .00 120,775.41 80.4 .00 495,359.59 .00 120,775.41 80.4 .00 495,359.59 .00 120,775.41 80.4 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.OX OF BUDGET YEAR) ,127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND PAGE 27 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE X USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1219 ADMINISTRATIVE CHGS 1219-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1219-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 8621 4 TELEPHONE SYSTEM 8621-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8621-4201 TELEPHONE SYSTEM EXPENDITURE CONTROL 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND 446.00 29.58 29.58 .00 416.424 6.6 1,448,083.00 120,673.59 362,020.77 .00 1,086,062.23 25.0 40,587.00 .00 .00 .00 40,587.00 0.0 1,489,116.00 120,703.17 362,050.35 .00 1,127,065.65 24.3 1,489,116.00 120,703.17 362,050.35 .00 1,127,065.65 24.3 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 .145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 28 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3403 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 3403-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3403-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 2,041.00 121.50 639.90 .00 1,401.10 . 31.4 3403-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3403-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 12,000.00 842.00 1,256.00 540.00 10,204.00 15.0 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 14,041.00 963.50 1,895.90 540.00 11,605.10 17.3 3405 FUND EXCHANGE 3405-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3405-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 170,000.00 .00 .00 .00 170,000.00 0.0 3408 COMMUTER XPRESS 3408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1,495.00 115.75 340.97 .00 1,154.03 22.8 3408-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3408-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 9,600.00 .00 .00 .00 9,600.00 0.0 COMMUTER XPRESS 11,095.00 115.75 340.97 .00 10,754.03 3.1 3409 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 3409-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3409-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1,741.00 .00 _ .00 .00 1,741.00 0.0 3409-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3409-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 11,607.00 402.22 3,133.76 573.09 7,900.15 31.9 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 13,348.00 402.22 3,133.76 573.09 9,641.15 27.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 208,484.00 1,481.47 5,370.63 1,113.09 202,000.28 3.1 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 208,484.00 1,481.47 5,370.63 1,113.09 202,000.28 3.1 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 29 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB.' BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3401 DIAL A RIDE 3401-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3401-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 25,321.00 1,961.33 5,846.94 .00 19,474.06 - 23.1 3401-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3401-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 185.00 9.21 9.21 .00 175.79 5.0 3401-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 173,000.00 .00 .00 .00 173,000.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 173,185.00 9.21 9.21 .00 173,175.79 0.0 3401-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3401-4304 TELEPHONE 50.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 0.0 3401-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 .00 8.23 .00 491.77 1.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 550.00 .00 8.23 .00 541.77 1.5 DIAL A RIDE 199,056.00 1,970.54 5,864.38 .00 193,191.62 2.9 8141 STREET REHAB 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 100,000.00 .00 .00 .00 100,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 299,056.00 1,970.54 5,864.38 .00 293,191.62 2.0 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 299,056.00 1,970.54 5,864.38 .00 293,191.62 2.0 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 150 GRANTS FUND PAGE 30 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8141 STREET REHAB 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES/PRIVATE 238,000.00 .00 .00 .00 238,000.00 - 0.0 8149 ST. REHAB. MONTEREY BLVD. 8149-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8149-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES/PRIVATE 60,000.00 .00 .00 .00 60,000.00 0.0 8170 SLURRY SEALING 8170-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8170-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES/PRIVATE 127,415.00 .00 .00 .00 127,415.00 0.0 8515 SO SCHOOL PARK 8515-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8515-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES/PRIVATE 100,000.00 .00 .00 .00 100,000.00 0.0 8523 BILTMORE SITE 8523-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8523-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES/PRIVATE 41,800.00 .00 .00 .00 41,800.00 0.0 OTHER 567,215.00 .00 .00 .00 567,215.00 0.0 GRANTS FUND 567,215.00 .00 - .00 .00 567,215.00 0.0 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 .152 AIR QUALITY MNGMNT DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 31 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3701-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 3701-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3701-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 3701-4327 AQMD INCENTIVES MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EMISSION CONTROL EXPENDITURE CONTROL AIR QUALITY MNGMNT DIST FUND 500.00 .00 75.00 .00 425.00 - 15.0 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 2,500.00 136.75 406.75 .00 2,093.25 16.3 3,000.00 136.75 406.75 .00 2,593.25 13.6 3,500.00 136.75 481.75 .00 3,018.25 13.8 3,500.00 136.75 481.75 .00 3,018.25 13.8 3,500.00 136.75 481.75 .00 3,018.25 13.8 EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 .155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 32 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 7,201.00 600.08 1,800.24 .00 5,400.76 - 25.0 2102 CROSSING GUARD 2102-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2102-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 9,795.00 834.96 2,654.99 .00 7,140.01 27.1 2102-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 50.87 68.52 .00 68.52- *** 2102-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 490.00 .00 65.94 .00 424.06 13.5 2102-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 62,216.00 3,382.11 3,400.61 .00 58,815.39 5.5 2102-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL .00 .00 3.06 .00 3.06- *** 2102-4180 RETIREMENT 1,871.00 158.16 471.08 .00 1,399.92 25.2 2102-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1,200.00 8.32 24.96 .00 1,175.04 2.1 2102-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 852.00 70.51 273.99 .00 578.01 32.2 2102-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 3,533.00 259.01 261.01 .00 3,271.99 7.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 79,957.00 4,763.94 7,224.16 .00 72,732.84 9.0 2102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2102-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 66.00 2.00 2.00 .00 64.00 3.0 2102-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 1,066.00 2.00 2.00 .00 1,064.00 0.2 2102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2102-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 0.0 2102-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 5,040.00 420.00 1,260.00 .00 3,780.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5,140.00 420.00 1,260.00 .00 3,880.00 24.5 CROSSING GUARD 86,163.00 5,185.94 8,486.16 .00 77,676.84 9.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 93,364.00 5,786.02 10,286.40 .00 83,077.60 11.0 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT FUND 93,364.00 5,786.02 10,286.40 .00 83,077.60 11.0 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) .160 SEWER FUND PAGE 33 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3102 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 3102-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3102-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 134,615.00 12,711.50 37,580.69 .00 97,034.31 27.9 3102-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 2,400.00 _ 591.14 928.96 .00 1,471.04 38.7 3102-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,730.00 19.82 801.54 .00 5,928.46 11.9 3102-4180 RETIREMENT 17,426.00 1,645.49 4,907.26 .00 12,518.74 28.2 3102-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 17,867.00 1,678.26 6,539.13 .00 11,327.87 36.6 3102-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 983.00 122.47 360.79 .00 622.21 36.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 180,021.00 16,768.68 51,118.37 .00 128,902.63 28.4 3102-4200 3102-4201 3102-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES/PRIVATE CONTRACT SERVICE/GOV'T CONTRACT SERVICES 28,484.00 212.84 6,979.64 5,555.72 15,948.64 44.0 3,400.00 .00 .00 .00 3,400.00 0.0 31,884.00 212.84 6,979.64 5,555.72" 19,348.64 39.3 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4303 UTILITIES 1,035.00 .00 175.19 .00 859.81 16.9 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 6,700.00 313.38 568.04 .00 6,131.96 8.5 3102-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 734.00 126.08 244.01 .00 489.99 33.2 3102-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,800.00 101.18 227.53 .00 1,572.47 12.6 3102-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 17,453.00 1,454.00 4,362.00 .00 13,091.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 27,722.00 1,994.64 5,576.77 .00 22,145.23 20.1 3102-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3102-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 180.00 .00 .00 .00 180.00 0.0 3102-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN 500 750.00 .00 .00 .00 750.00 0.0 3102-5403 VEHICLES 20,000.00 .00 .00 .00 20,000.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 20,930.00 .00 .00 .00 20,930.00 0.0 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 260,557.00 18,976.16 63,674.78 5,555.72 191,326.50 26.6 8301 MISC STORM DRAINS 8301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8301-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 8301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8301-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 29,000.00 .00 .00 .00 29,000.00 0.0 MISC STORM DRAINS 30,000.00 .00 .00 .00 30,000.00 0.0 8302 NPDES IMPROVEMENTS 8302-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8302-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 15,017.00 67.75 867.57 .00 14,149.43 5.8 8302-4180 NPDES IMPROVEMENTS -RETIREMENT 1,349.00 8.77 81.57 .00 1,267.43 6.0 8302-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 995.00 .00 123.93 .00 871.07 12.5 8302-4189 NPDES IMPROVEMENTS MEDICARE 145.00 .98 13.64 .00 131.36 9.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 17,506.00 77.50 1,086.71 .00 16,419.29 6.2 8302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ,160 SEWER FUND PAGE 34 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8302-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 66,629.00 754.00- 249.00- .00 66,878.00 0.4- 8302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8302-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 365.00 365.00 119.82 .00 245.18 32.8 8302-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .00 .00 .00 .00 ' .00 *** 8302-4316 TRAINING .00 - .00 10.00 .00 10.00- *** 8302-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 865.00 865.00 129.82 .00 735.18 15.0 NPDES IMPROVEMENTS 85,000.00 188.50 967.53 .00 84,032.47 1.1 8408 SANITARY SEWER 8408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 40,945.00 2,899.08 7,871.70 .00 33,073.30 19.2 8408-4180 RETIREMENT 5,514.00 375.28 1,046.92 .00 4,467.08 19.0 8408-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,170.00 .00 54.26 .00 4,115.74 1.3 8408-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 594.00 42.05 114.16 .00 479.84 19.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 51,223.00 3,316.41 9,087.04 .00 42,135.96 17.7 8408-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8408-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 3,048,777.00 33,722.77 33,722.77 .00 3,015,054.23 1.1 SANITARY SEWER 3,100,000.00 37,039.18 42,809.81 .00 3,057,190.19 1.4 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 3,475,557.00 56,203.84 107,452.12 5,555.72 3,362,549.16 3.3 SEWER FUND 3,475,557.00 56,203.84 107,452.12 5,555.72 3,362,549.16 3.3 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND PAGE 35 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 8,241.00 686.75 2,060.25 .00 6,180.75 ' 25.0 2103 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 2103-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2103-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 82,410.00 6,889.25 20,951.24 .00 61,458.76 25.4 2103-4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 2,640.00 220.00 660.00 .00 1,980.00 25.0 2103-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 2,811.60 4,498.57 .00 4,498.57- *** 2103-4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 15,000.00 .00 .00 .00 15,000.00 0.0 2103-4109 COURT TIME 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 2103-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,252.00 .00 13,700.34 .00 9,448.34- 322.2 2103-4180 RETIREMENT 19,736.00 1,644.44 5,060.94 .00 14,675.06 25.6 2103-4187 UNIFORMS 2,000.00 83.34 250.02 .00 1,749.98 12.5 2103-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,552.00 364.09 1,456.38 .00 3,095.62 32.0 2103-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 717.00 100.83 244.76 .00 472.24 34.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 132,307.00 12,113.55 46,822.25 .00 85,484.75 35.4 2103-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2103-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 1,107.00 28.10 28.10 .00 1,078.90 2.5 2103-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2103-4304 TELEPHONE 5,200.00 731.30 1,008.60 .00 4,191.40 19.4 2103-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 3,500.00 74..23 125.65 .00 3,374.35 3.6 2103-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,200.00 5.00 5.00 .00 2,195.00 0.2 2103-4316 TRAINING 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 2103-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1,400.00 .00 .00 .00 1,400.00 0.0 2103-4322 UNCLASSIFIED 4,500.00 .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 0.0 2103-4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 29,724.00 2,477.00 7,431.00 .00 22,293.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 48,024.00 3,287.53 8,570.25 .00 39,453.75 17.8 2103-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2103-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 30,000.00 .00 .00 .00 30,000.00 0.0 2103-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 2103-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 38,805.00 .00 .00 .00 38,805.00 0.0 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 250,243.00 15,429.18 55,420.60 .00 194,822.40 22.1 8619 POL REMODEL III 8619-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8619-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 28,006.00 .00 985.00 4,970.00 22,051.00 21.3 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 286,490.00 16,115.93 58,465.85 4,970.00 223,054.15 22.1 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND 286,490.00 16,115.93 58,465.85 4,970.00 223,054.15 22.1 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND PAGE 36 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE 2202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2202-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 100,603.00 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 100,603.00 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 100,603.00 25.81 25.81 25.81 25.81 .00 100,577.19 " 0.0 25.81 .00 100,577.19 0.0 ' 25.81 .00 100,577.19 0.0 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) .705 INSURANCE FUND PAGE 37 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1209 LIABILITY INSURANCE 1209-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1209-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 25,041.00 2,086.60 6,259.82 .00 18,781.18 25.0 1209-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,252.00 75.46 75.46 .00 1,176.54 6.0 1209-4180 RETIREMENT 3,242.00 270.10 810.30 .00 2,431.70 25.0 1209-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,012.00 214.30 881.45 .00 2,130.55 29.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 32,547.00 2,646.46 8,027.03 .00 24,519.97 24.7 1209-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1209-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 405,500.00 44,712.75 250,842.75 .00 154,657.25 61.9 1209-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1209-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 109.58 208.11 1,382.37 1,090.48- 318.1 1209-4315 MEMBERSHIP 250.00 205.00 205.00 .00 45.00 82.0 1209-4316 TRAINING 200.00 30.00 30.00 .00 170.00 15.0 1209-4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 700.00 .00 .00 .00 700.00 0.0 1209-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 100,000.00 10,678.93 11,158.68 .00 88,841.32 11.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 101,650.00 11,023.51 11,601.79 1,382.37 88,665.84 12.8 LIABILITY INSURANCE 539,697.00 58,382.72 270,471.57 1,382.37 267,843.06 50.4 1210 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 1210-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1210-4201 PROP/BONDS /CONTRACT SERVICE/P 20,550.00 .00 17,687.00 .00 2,863.00 86.1 1210-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1210-4324 PROP/BONDS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 15,000.00 .00 4,696.99- .00 19,696.99 31.3- AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 35,550.00 .00 12,990.01 .00 22,559.99 36.5 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT 1215-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1215-4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 20,000.00 3,851.00 3,851.00 .00 16,149.00 19.3 1217 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1217-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1217-4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 32,238.00 2,086.67 6,593.96 .00 25,644.04 20.5 1217-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,612.00 75.46 75.46 .00 1,536.54 4.7 1217-4180 RETIREMENT 4,173.00 270.12 853.60 .00 3,319.40 20.5 1217-4182 WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR 300,000.00 34,599.43 99,455.93 .00 200,544.07 33.2 1217-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,650.00 390.53 1,310.19 .00 3,339.81 28.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 342,673.00 37,422.21 108,289.14 .00 234,383.86 31.6 1217-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1217-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 47,900.00 .00 19,335.00 .00 28,565.00 40.4 1217-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2,000.00 .00 .00 .00 2,000.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 49,900.00 .00 19,335.00 .00 30,565.00 38.7 1217-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 .705 INSURANCE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 38 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1217-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 600.00 12.82 172.28 .00 427.72 28.7 1217-4316 TRAINING 1,400.00 .00 .00 .00 1,400.00 0.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2,000.00 12.82 172.28 .00 1,827.72 8.6 1217-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1217-5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 WORKERS COMPENSATION 396,073.00 37,435.03 127,796.42 .00 268,276.58 32.3 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** BUDGET TRANSFER OUT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EXPENDITURE CONTROL 989,820.00 99,668.75 415,109.00 1,382.37 573,328.63 42.1 OTHER 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 INSURANCE FUND 991,320.00 99,668.75 415,109.00 1,382.37 574,828.63 42.0 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 10/20/94 09:55:55 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE CONTROL OTHER GRAND TOTALS PAGE 39 ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 21,161,401.00 1,356,357.10 4,598,198.24 42,808.88 16,520,393.88 21.9 903,194.00 .00 .00 .00 903,194.00 0.0 22,064,595.00 1,356,357.10 4,598,198.24 42,808.88 17,423,587.88 21.0 • EXPPRIN2 10/20/94 09:55:55 DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE RECAP REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 (025.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 40 ADJUSTED SEPTEMBER 1994-95 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 001 GENERAL FUND 9,958,703.00 805,254.95 2,393,198.88 28,279.35 7,537,224.77 24.3 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING DISTRICT 608,950.00 40,929.35 113,180.60 8.35 495,761.05 18.6 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 273,062.00 8,216.91 27,035.11 1,500.00 244,526.89 10.5 110 PARKING FUND 1,910,505.00 154,636.01 483,963.85 .00 1,426,541.15 25.3 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 659,763.00 36,296.68 111,423.00 .00 548,340.00 16.9 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 89,309.00 .52 .52 .00 89,308.48 0.0 121 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND 219,729.00 .00 .00 .00 219,729.00 0.0 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 213,734.00 8,930.40 8,930.40 .00 204,803.60 4.2 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 616,135.00 .00 495,359.59 .00 120,775.41 80.4 127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND 1,489,116.00 120,703.17 362,050.35 .00 1,127,065.65 24.3 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 208,484.00 1,481.47 5,370.63 1,113.09 202,000.28 3.1 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 299,056.00 1,970.54 5,864.38 .00 293,191.62 2.0 150 GRANTS FUND 567,215.00 .00 .00 .00 567,215.00 0.0 152 AIR QUALITY MNGMNT DIST FUND 3,500.00 136.75 481.75 .00 3,018.25 13.8 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT FUND 93,364.00 5,786.02 10,286.40 .00 83,077.60 11.0 160 SEWER FUND 3,475,557.00 56,203.84 107,452.12 5,555.72 3,362,549.16 3.3 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND 286,490.00 16,115.93 58,465.85 4,970.00 223,054.15 22.1 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 100,603.00 25.81 25.81 .00 100,577.19 0.0 705 INSURANCE FUND 991,320;00- - 99,668.75 415,109.00 1,382.37 574,828.63 42.0 GRAND TOTALS 22,064,595.00 1,356,357.10 4,598,198.24 42,808.88 17,423,587.88 21.0 1' TREASURER'S REPORT - SEPTEMBER 1994 FUND GENERAL 9/1/94' CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 9/30/94 NUMBER ACCOUNT BALANCE BALANCE 001 GENERAL 51,497,163.54 5451,529.34 5190,910.06 ($537,675.68) ($92,413.93) $1,509,513.33 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT 51,231,737.77 $0.00 52,518.03 ($20,412.50) ($14,341.70) $1,199,501.60 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT $482,911.47 $16,549.67 5987.21 ($43,747.67) ($278.86) $456,421.82 110 PARKING $197,324.10 1.213,619.07 $403.39 ($43,126.59) (586,638.71) $281,581.26 115 STATE GAS TAX $426,762.37 $28,371.47 $872.43 (5248.84) ($36,199.25) $419,558.18 120 COUNTY GAS TAX $8,992.19 $0.00 $18.38 ($0.52) $0.00 $9,010.05 125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX $175,815.82 $0.00 5359.42 ($8,930.40) $0.00 $167,244.84 126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 51,919,544.24 $118,221.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,037,765.93 127 6X UTILITY USERS TAX 5491,196.64 $139,911.33 $1,004.15 (1.29.58) ($120,673.59) 5511,408.95 145 PROPOSITION A FUND $78,882.02 $232.80 $161.26 ($1,426.86) $0.00 $77,849.22 146 PROPOSITION C FUND $156,550.17 $12,991.00 $320.03 ($991.20) 50.00 $168,870.00 150 GRANT FUND $171,889.74 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $171,889.74 152 AIR QUALITY MGT.DISTRICT $35,797.00 $0.00 $73.18 (5135.91) $0.00 $35,734.27 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT $31,917.65 $0.00 $65.25 ($688.04) ($1,020.08) $30,274.78 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE $3,703,762.46 $1,879.75 1.74,238.23 (545,542.62) (1.1,523.13) $3,732,814.69 170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE $451,295.34 $0.00 $922.58 ($9,372.58) (53,202.38) 5439,642.96 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND $446,365.44 $0.00 $912.50 ($25.81) $0.00 $447,252.13 705 SELF INSURANCE FUND $672,623.26 $0.00 $82,624.00 ($97,100.47) (5122.40) $658,024.39 $12,180,531.22 $983,306.12 $356,390.10 (5809,455.27) ($356,414.03) $12,354,358.14 TRUST ACCOUNTS PAYROLL UNAVAILABLE DUE TO SOFTWARE CONVERSION $9,906,562.49 INACTIVE DEPOSIT 1.1,876,490.55 $534,224.95 INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY $49,880.71 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE GENERAL OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT BALANCE J•.'r� •RKMAN, CITY TREASURER TO • 19, 1994 5719,271.34 $719,271.34 $147,966.24 $571,305.10 $11,783,053.04 $12,354,358.14 1d() 4 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council October 17, 1994 City Council Meeting of October 25, 1994 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of September 1994. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, Work an Treasurer NOTED: Stephen R. Turrell City Mana•-r INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - SEPTEMBER 1994 DATE OF INVESTMENT DATE OF MATURITY ASKING PRICE MARKET VALUE INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 9/1/94 Maturity Maturity BALANCE 9/30/94 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 9/1/94 BALANCE 9/30/94 FEDERAL NATL.MTGE.ASSN.DEB. CORPORATE NOTES: S & S Finance International U.S. TREASURY BOND: Investment Investment Investment Investment INVESTMENT TOTAL $6,812,000.00 (400,000.00) (600,000.00) $5,812,000.00 $1,876,490.55 $1,876,490.55 $526,936.81 07/06/94 $572,968.75 9/16/94 $989,687.50 $1,008,437.50 $497,469.43 $499,062.50 $11,783,053.04 9/1/94 9/14/94 4.989% 4.550% 09/10/96 $ 526,936.81 $ 509,375.00 6.245% 12/16/96 $ 572,960.75 $ 504,155.00 6.696% 12/03/92 11/30/97 $ 989,687.50 $ 972,810.00 6.243% 02/18/93 01/31/98 $1,008,437.50 $ 959,380.00 5.429% 05/11/94 04/30/96 $ 497,469.43 $ 493,440.00 5.849% 06/30/94 06/30/96 $ 499,062.50 $ 496,250.00 6.100% SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 9/1/94 S565,533.91 Adjustment (43,841.14) BALANCE 9/30/94 $521,692.77 CHICAGO TITLE BALANCE 6/01/94 S12,532.18 BALANCE 6/30/94 8.625% $12,532.18 2.594% TRUSTEE TOTAL $534,224.95 GRAND TOTAL $12,317,277.99 Respectfully Submitted, Joh rkman C. y T asurer October 17, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of October 25, 1994 ARTS HERMOSA / FIRST NIGHT: DECEMBER 31, 1994 Recommendation It is recommended by the Downtown Enhancement Commission and staff that Council: 1. Approve the street closure request from Arts Hermosa for December 31, 1994 subject to the conditions listed in the analysis below; and 2. approve an allocation of $5,000 from the Downtown Enhancement Fund for the event; and 3. approve fee waivers as listed in the analysis below. Background Pursuant to ordinance #94-5679, street closures require a review by the Downtown Enhancement Commission followed by review by the City Council. Arts Hermosa, a newly established non-profit organization is seeking approval to conduct a New Year's Eve special event that has been held in other communities called "First Night." The street closure requested is for Pier Avenue from Valley Drive west to the Strand from 4:00 p.m. - 2:00 am, December 31, 1994 - January 1, 1995. Attachment A outlines Arts Hermosa's specific request (Attachment B is a survey conducted among merchants on Pier Avenue) while Attachment C is a letter requesting a $5,000 allocation from the Downtown Enhancement Fund to assist in the subsidy of this event. At their October 5, 1994 meeting, the Downtown Enhancement Commission approved the street closure request. The funding request from Arts Hermosa also received a recommendation for approval from the Commission who are asking Council to appropriate the funds from the Downtown Enhancement Fund reserves. Analysis STREET CLOSURE REQUEST Pending an ongoing review of the organization's ability to successfully fund and operate this event, staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions/fees: le • Furnish the City of Hermosa Beach with a certificate of insurance covering comprehensive and general liability in the amount of $2 million dollars. • Indemnify the City. • Chief of Police shall determine the number of officers necessary to ensure event safety and traffic control. Costs for officers to be assigned to Arts Hermosa. • Arts Hermosa shall be responsible to provide adequate trash receptacles and portable toilets as necessary to accommodate the event. • The streets shall be cleaned by Arts Hermosa to meet the conditions as specified by City staff • Arts Hermosa will be solely responsible for event management. • Arts Hermosa will post temporary no parking signs as required by the City. • Arts Hermosa will abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by the City. Fees: Recommend do not waive these fees: • Police fees @ $59.75/hr. per officer. • Permit Administration fee: $300. • Public Works fees TBD if necessary for street closures, banners etc. • Civic Theater staff fees @ $10-$15/hr per staff technician. Recommend fee waivers for: • Civic Theater rental fees/ damage deposits estimated at $3,000. • Meter Buy-out fees @ $15.50 per meter per day. • Non-profit special event fees @ $1.10 per participant. • Sign review fee @ 86.75 (for wall mural at Video Archives). As indicated above, staff will recommend fee waivers where there is no direct cost to the City associated with the fee. That is, as is consistent with most non-profit fee waivers, the City is reimbursed for out-of-pocket and actual staff expenses. If the street closure is approved by Council, the community could benefit substantially from this cultural event which has proven to be highly successful in other cities. Fiscal Impact: Expenditure of $5,000 from the Downtown Enhancement Fund. Balance remaining after the appropriation $267,952. i ATTACHMENTS: A. Arts Hermosa Request B. Merchant Survey C. Funding Request D. Wall mural location and design Respectfully Submitted, Mary ney Co nity Resources Director Concur: Stephen R. Burr City Manager Sol BTumenfeli, D hector Community D-velopment Dept. Attachment "A'.' ARTS HERMOSA/FirstNIGHT 49 Pier Ave.- Hermosa ve.Hermosa Beach ,CA 90254 Dragana Bajalovic, Director Phone (310) 374 3813 City of ,Hermosa Beach DowntownEnhancement Commission c/o Amy Amirani, Director of Public Works 1315_ Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ti . Dear members of the Downtown Enhancement Commission, 1, • • On December 31, 1994, Arts Hermosa, with the support of Hermosa •Beach Chamber of Commerce will present an 'Arts Festival. Arts Hermosa was established for the purpose of -bringing activities and education to the Hermosa Beach that would enhance the appreciation for the arts in our community: Arts Hermosa Board of Directors -is confident that more representation- of the arts in our community would raise interest in our town, bring more business to ' the local merchants and improve the quality of life for our residents. FirstNight® is the first project towards this, goal. " Arts Hermosa is now a full member of the First Night® International; Alliance that encompasses' 107 cities • in the North America and Australia. FirstNight® festivals are presented' by non-profit organizations for the purpose of celebrating' the arts and New Year in a safe, family - and community oriented environment. All members of the Alliance are committed , to presenting an affordable, 'diverse and alcohol -free event: ), L On December 31st the Downtown becomes the stage for numerous indoor performances, street vendors for light food and beverage, street entertainers and exhibits of visual arts. Performances lasting 45 minutes each are presented simultaneously in listed locations from 5:30 PM until 11:30 PM. At 11:30 a procession guides all participants to the center of town where they together bring in the New Year. 3 'J• Locations _Civic Center St. Cross Church Nations Clark, Stadium Library 'City Hall Post Office Parking Lot Fire Station Java Man Avant Garb Bijou Theater Citybank Brewworks Ironworks Restyle Pacific Screenprint Loreto' Plaza Sponda Street Closures Arts Hermosa Board recommends the- closure to the vehicular traffic on the streets that will have a 7. hour_ period of heavy pedestrian traffic. ,, - The streets affected are: Pier Ave Valley Drive- to the head of the pier; ' i, > �• • On the above mentioned streets, 'local restaurants will have- the prime opportunity to offer a sample of their cuisine. There will be street entertainment as licensed by Arts Hermosa;. , There will be banners and other visual and participatory art projects, Monterey Ave (not closed to vehicular traffic) will have a balcony decoration contest/sidewalk painting contest. Parking Arts Hermosa will be 'responsible for making announcements regarding: Where parking is permitted - That the City will enforce all traffic- and parking regulations , Arts Hermosa will. provide all directional signs which shall be :.: approved in advance by the City. , , Shuttle busses /Trolleys will provide transpiration to and from designated satellite' point on the outskirts or outside Hermosa Beach city limits. Transportation Busses 'will, provide local transportation free Wave and ' Taxi service will be available. Sanitary requirements' with a button: . , ,. Arts Hermosa/ FirstNIGHT® will be responsible for providing sufficient - number of portable toilets, trash containers and' recycling bins. ; _ - k- . Arts Hermosa will make arrangements for clean-up during and after the event ., FirstNIGHT® Festival- is a community and family oriented event, an alcohol -free alternative to celebrating the ,New Year's Eve: Because the event takes place in the downtown where all performances are in a walking distance. For - public safety reasons, Arts Hermosa recommends the closure of the Pier Avenue to the vehicular traffic. • ' FirstNIGHT® will establish a Control Center -located in the Arts -Hermosa Office' at ,49 Pier Ave. This will be the central location -for reports of any emergencies or disturbances. In the field, Arts Hermosa will establish volunteer Security Patrols whose responsibility is to oversee and regularly report to the Control Center via walky-talkys. ky 6 _1'.• In all venues Arts Hermosa will comply with Building / Fire dept. regulations. All participants will be issued a performance permit by the Arts." Hermosa ' which will be checked_ by the ` Security Patrol. Hours of the street closures: Street closure for the set up: 4:00 PM December 31st, Festivities begin @ 5:30 PM and end @ 12:30 AM. ' Clean up -begins at 12:30 and is completed by 2:00 AM, January 1st. 1995. `, , i Insurance of required- $1' million will be provided by Arts Hermosa. Event Promotion: will begin in September in local media;, November 1st. on local and Los Angeles area Radio stations, newspapers, TV,, magazines, banners,_ and ` will continue through December. Local businesses will ,have the first. opportunity to sponsor the events and/or 'promotional material. Neighborhood impact - schedule There will be pedestrian traffic flowing between designated FirstNight® venues from 5:30 PM to approximately 1:00 AM January 1st. At 11:30. -PM a procession of visitors and artists will carry banners, masks, giant puppets' and other objects „connected' with the celebration of the New Year (like resolution sculptures etc). The procession will end at 'the head of the pier where a' Big Band Stand will play until the , countdown to midnight and the New Year. The Big Band stand will be located at the head of the pier on the Strand. The performance/dance will begin at 11:00 PM and will end promptly at 12:30 AM, January 1 st.1995 . All other outside, events will end at 11:30 December 31st. At 12:30 break down starts between Pacific Coast Highway and Strand on, Pier Avenue. Clean up begins immediately, and is completed by- 2 00 AM January 1st,- 1995. • City Benefit: FirstNIGHT® showcases the artists among us and the ,artist in each of us. It brings the attention 'to Hermosa community 7 up to 8,000 people may attend between 5:30 and '12:30 including families with children, young adults, citizens from local community- as well as .from the broader Los Angeles Area. In the past, art was' part of life in " Hermosa. ` This event will give the community a chance to re- establish it's image of cultural appreciation. Cost Arts Hermosa is a non profit organization funded by corporate, private, public sponsorship ( admission is L$8 for adults and children' attend free) and donations in kind. -Arts Hermosa, as a_ member of the First Night Alliance is committed to designating larger portion of the budget .for reimbursement of the artists and making the event accessible to wide range of audiences. Arts Hermosa will request that all fees for special event permit be waved: • i - r • • • 44 Nrr Avow amen Imo CA 811254 �< 31& 374.3813 Andlama Brie* Hamar. Mari el *octane - Pregame: Ma Sa dirr Tremor= Racy (his S.a.dwp tsk irie Advisory lea& Me Mk, l.ei.awl las Gismo Danek Curtsey hoe aid Jia c i.id Rick lamed Mani M tan Gin Lary 'G.�i►�•JSrj.k Gary W. September 22, 1994 ' To the businesses on Pier ,Avenue and Hermosa" Avenue. In an effort to develop more interest in the Hermosa . Beach"" community and bring more business to the local economy, Arts Hermosa is planing 2 a New Year Celebration on December 31, 1994. . FirstNIGHT® is a professional performing arts festival designed to attract the entire community. 'The downtown will be transformed into a stage, with variety of _ performances taking place between the hours of 5:30 and midnight. No alcoholic beverages will be served at the performing venues. To insure safety for all attendees Arts Hermosa is requesting the closure of Pier Avenue to vehicular . traffic on Pier Avenue from Valley Drive- to the pier. The hours that closure will be in effect are from 4:00 PM. to 12:30 AM on Saturday December 31, 1994. There will be free shuttle service provided to and from nearby parking facilities. . , C Arts Hermosa , is a ,non profit organization and one of over 100 members of the International Alliance of First Nights. This internationally acclaimed event is designed ` to reacquaint the community with its downtown. Performances will take place on numerous locations on Pier ' and Hermosa Avenues. At 11:30 PM there will be a festive, procession led bylarge puppets and dancers that will , culminate at the head of the Pier, in a count down to midnight. --� ,. ' Arts- Hermosa, is ' working ' "the City with government and Chamber 'of ' Commerce ,to ensure that this -event will be well organized, safe and . ' beneficial to all members ; of Hermosa Beach's community. ' As the Director of FirstNIGHT®, I personally invite your comments and _questions. On behalf of the Board of Directors of Arts Hermosa, I ..request_ your cooperation, support and participation in Hermosa Beach's ,inaugural ,FirstNIGHT® Celebration. ', • • 1 Serely, J 'f DragaiY Bajalovic Director, FirstNIGHT® 49 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 374-3813 , 1 2 3 4 5 67, 8 9 10 A c v st1 Pt & -ry -t,e.4-r--3c_ NAME OF YOUR BUSINESS kA -a-Aa-3'7Cris S ,c (Qs. (QS ' 2`I LCAT u S' ORA'S STUFF ttrn c, ( 'rncxzLk L KP 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 01, .4 U l 7r, - taetdry B ADDRESS 42 (PtL s ---/S Pr /ie_ C I AM -I SUPPORT OF FIRSTNIGHT •• iE- tr cl1. 1c. 6' Q cb ma k_ 0/2 `t 4D Pe,, Ave 4(30 Pier �4v� lf-'L-6 p 7 ler ceue.• U,,,,z,J,A 32 THANK YOU • SEE YOU ON NEW YEAR'S EVE Page 1 HAPPY NEW YEARI 1 NAME OF Y • UR BUS ESS ADDRESS 2 V ori AYA / M,P`/' w2.:& 3 fiEi tnvs4 1lisANE.Ss6.-?S 8 ler: E{.:E. 4 44 B Pr<H kKA-- Zo pi 5 _5-77./C77-77.5"�lW �i -4 6 3p/ 2. - /55,.hi. 7 T S inar/ccs 5 fi v 8 iIPL GJ eV S 17 18 /36,10 1 9 5c�� g- 2 0 20 f'y)4 . THANK YOU SEE YOU ON NEW YEAR'S EVE Page 1 HAPPY NEW YEARI Attachment "C" - J A NIGHT .a...,. a:(. 49 Nr Ave... BHA CA 90254 31e. 374. 3813 Arlsllonw. , !i,MB f t Norma - herd of *odors Presidio: Ma So11r hoeso sr: Nasty Goble Soar/fur Ledo N{rJosk Advisory 1e1.4s brio n4 In Ce1... Dorotity 1. _J J Courtesy Rock lamed arab W. Lary_ Ado Olin Gory September 27, 199.4 To: Enhancement Commission of Hermosa Beach Dear Commissioners, r . J_ x � 1 ' Arts Hermosa, a non profit California- corporation, the presenter of the FirstNIGHT® is requesting from 'Enhancement Commission to co-sponsor the advertising = of this event for direct benefit to the merchants and businesses of Hermosa Beach. • As we , anticipate publicity costs to 'exceed the amount of 5,000.00, Arts Hermosa respectfully - request that the Commissioners consider awarding a grant of $5,000.00 which will go towards -,presenting the FirstNIGHT® event to the greater Los }.-'Angeles area. ; ,We appreciate your consideration and look forward ,working with you. Sincerely,_' Dragana Bajalovic '49 : Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 374-3813 • Attachment "D" EXHIBIT Video Archives Parking Lot Sidewalk Hermosa Avenue Shark's Cove Proposed Mural Location October 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council /r,e 9 --5.208 Regular Meeting of October 25, 1994 POLICY GUIDELINES FOR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL ON CITY PROPERTY i Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council adopt the attached resolution approving guidelines for regulating the consumption of alcohol on City property. Background At the October 11, 1994 meeting, Council introduced an amendment to Section 21-23 of the Municipal Code to allow for the consumption of alcohol in outdoor public areas pursuant to a permit issued by the City Council or its delegate. The provisions contained in the amendment require that Council adopt guidelines for the issuance of permits for alcohol consumption on public property. Analysis The attached guidelines attempt to formalize the spirit of Council discussions which would allow local non-profit agencies or the City to conduct fundraisers and community events in public places with the ability to serve or sell (subject to ABC permits) alcohol. The guidelines further attempt to allow administrative discretion in issuing routine permits for private parties (such as wedding receptions in buildings) while requiring a review process for alcohol consumption or sale in outdoor areas. As dictated in the ordinance, appeals can be made by applicants to City Council on administrative decisions or decisions made by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Respectfully Submitted, oney munity Resources Director Concur: Stephen R. 11 City Manager if M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 21-23 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL AT PUBLIC OUTDOOR FACILITIES SUBJECT TO A PERMIT. WHEREAS, the City Council adopted an amendment to the Municipal Code Section 21-23 to allow for the consumption of alcohol at public outdoor facilities subject to permit by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Section 1(h) requires that guidelines for permits and delegated authority for their issuance shall be adopted by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Ordinance specifies that application for said permits shall be made only by qualified non-profit organizations; and WHEREAS, the City Council requested that only certain outdoor areas be authorized for alcohol consumption; and WHEREAS, the City Council requested clarification on policies for alcohol consumption in public buildings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California approves the attached guidelines which shall be used by the Department of Community Resources; the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission, and the City Council in issuing permits for the consumption of alcohol in public buildings and outdoor areas. 1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1994. ATTEST: PRESIDENT, of the City Council, and MAYOR of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY GUIDELINES FOR THE CONSUMPTION AND SALE OF ALCOHOL IN CITY BUILDINGS, PARKS AND OUTDOOR AREAS The policy guidelines below shall be used by the Department of Community Resources in issuing any and all permits that include a request for the consumption of alcohol in City parks, buildings and outdoor areas: 1. Public Buildings: A. Private parties / Commercial groups: Individuals and groups requesting the use of public buildings for private parties can serve (but not sell) alcohol at approved functions. Approval shall be made through the Department of Community Resources subject to all of the terms and conditions of our facility reservation policies. B. Non-profit Organizations: Officially registered non-profit organizations requesting the use of public buildings can serve alcohol at approved functions. Subject to the issuance of an ABC permit, the Department of Community Resources may approve events that include the sale of alcoholic beverages in public buildings subject to all of the terms and conditions of our facility reservation policies. C. City functions: Officially sponsored City functions are subject to the same terms and conditions as listed for non-profit organizations. 2. Outdoor areas: A. Private parties / Commercial groups: Shall be prohibited from applying for the use of any outdoor facility or park that would include the consumption or sale of alcohol. B. Non-profit organizations: Officially registered Hermosa Beach -based non-profit organizations (see definition in item E below) may apply to the Department of Community Resources for the use of any outdoor area listed under item D below for any event that includes the consumption or sale (subject to ABC approval) of alcohol. Application for this use shall be made as part of a special event permit application which shall be subject to review and approval by staff and the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission. Appeals may be made to the City Council whose decision is final. C. City functions: Officially sponsored City functions are subject to the same terms and conditions as listed for non-profit organizations. D. Approved locations: Subject to review and approval, the outdoor areas listed below are approved for events that may include the consumption or sale (subject to ABC approval) of alcohol: Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to the Strand. Clark Stadium Field. Hermosa Valley Park. South School Park. Community Center grounds. E. Hermosa Beach -based non-profit organizations: Shall be defined as officially registered non-profit organizations with a non-profit identification number whose address is in Hermosa Beach. Exceptions may be made for non-profit organizations that are based outside of the City but who provide direct services to Hermosa Beach residents. All applicants are subject to the terms and conditions listed in applicable Facility Reservation and Special Event Policies and Ordinances including fees and insurance requirements. All applicants are subject to regulations and must comply with all requirements from the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. All applicants agree to be fully responsible for ensuring that event participants and organizers are not served excessive amounts of alcohol and do not endanger themselves and/or others by operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol. All applicants agree to be fully responsible for ensuring that no person under the age of21 can purchase or drink alcohol at the event. Adopted by City Council on October 25, 1994 October 13, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council October 25, 1994 EMERGENCY GENERATOR CAPABILITY IN LOCAL GROCERY STORES WITH INCENTIVE PROGRAM TO PROVIDER RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Receive and file this report. 2. Propose incentive program to generator provider. 3. Direct staff to implement incentive program. BACKGROUND: City Council requested a study be conducted to ascertain if local grocery store owners were interested in maintaining an emergency generator for food stuffs in case of emergencies and disasters. The intent of the program was to provide emergency food supplies to our citizens. Also, to reimburse the grocery store owner in some fashion for purchasing and maintaining an emergency back up generator. ANALYSIS: Staff conducted a survey by contacting all the businesses (markets, stores, taverns, restaurants) in the city which could provide food supplies or services to our citizens. All expressed interest in the idea. None were willing to commit to the purchase of an emergency generator without knowing how the city was going to assist them. The three major supermarkets, Lucky, Vons and Ralphs Stores by policy allow each store manager to decide what action to take regarding disasters and emergencies depending on their severity. Perishables such as meats, dairy products, and frozen food are lost within hours. Necessities such as batteries, water, etc., are gone in less than a day. These major stores will help any way they can. For example, Lucky Stores during the Northridge earthquake had employees remove all salvageable items outside where the public could then take whatever for free. lg Unfortunately, the size of the generator to support food and lighting requirements in a supermarket is cost prohibitive. It is generally accepted practice for these large stores to turn off the electrical power to the stores in order to avoid power surges which may damage their existing equipment. If the electrical system is damaged, the time lengthens as to when the store can again become fully operational. The next category of medium size markets such as Bocatto's, to small food establishments such as Rinaldi's Sandwich Shop on Pier Avenue, have a lesser power supply demand and are therefore better candidates for having an emergency generator capability. This category includes all the remaining markets, stores, restaurants and taverns in the city. In all, sixty establishments are interested in the program. (See attached survey.) The cost of the generators to supply the different type and size of businesses will vary from $2,500 to $3,600. The amount of amperage required for the lighting and/or refrigeration units will determine the size of the generator to be purchased. A rule of thumb is the generator capacity should be 1.5 to 2.0 times the running current listed on the appliance or equipment. Respec fully sub pitted, Val Straser, Chief of Police Hermosa Beach Police Department Attachment Concur: /moi, S phen Burrell City Manager HERMOSA 8EACH 'POLICE DEPARTMENT To: Chief Val Straser From: Ofc. C. Lewis Subject: Emergency Preparedness x x x x x x x x x x* x x x x x x x x x x x i x x x x x x x x x x t x x e t x x x x x t x x x r x x x x x x x x x R Chief Straser, At your direction, I have contacted each of the businesses listed below inquiring if the business would consider purchasing a generator for electrical power to be used in cases of power outages as a result of emergencies, earthquakes, civil unrest etc. I informed them the city was considering a method to assit them in the cost of such a generator, a tax break or licensing reduction were examples I used. While many thought it was a good idea, no one was willing to commit to the purchase with -out more firm facts from the city regarding the method of assistance. Dianna's Restaurant Sam Magana - owner 374-8300 Hennessey's Tavern Paul Hennesssy Lex Hunyak - Mgr, contact 372-0082 Buona Vita Sidney Lecther - owner Allan Galeano - owner 379-7626 Thai Top Chalong Kuan Quales - owner 379-4626 Char -O -Chicken Hassan Shavif - owner International Liquor Kyung Hak Lee 860-8427 Manhattan Market Rajesh Singh 558-1995 Marina Liquor Sani Nasser 289-1262 Jino's Pizza Andre Karabalaie 305-7282 247-4195 (pager) Mickeys Liquor Granny's Market Andre - Shirley Klaser 372-6639 Lomelli's El Polio Inka Shirely Arroyo - owne'r Scott Arroyo - owner 532-6967 Lapettie Cafe John Holiday - owner Ellis Chane - owner 379-1400 Round Table Ginger Eastman 545-1944 Dan's Liquor Paul Luong (818) 282-3175 Critters Miachael William Bringhurst 545-3218 El Gringo Brian Byhower 376-5776 Golden Lyon Liquor Farid M. Bader 540-1461 Alta Dena Wonsan Ahn Katsuko Y. Ahn 329-3546 7-11 Ron Nash - not contacted 545-1488 Best Donuts Yoo In Seo Hong KOng Express Chiahoa Sun The Spot Maurice Beaudet 372-7586 Hill Top Cafe Wayne Margeson - owner Carol Morino - owner 318-8922 Back Burner Cafe Gary Wheelock - owner Barbara Eriksen - owner 372-6973 Strawberry Patch Faheed Dandah - owner 372-2194 Rinaldi's Chris Dunn - owner Barbara Dunn - contact 373-7823 Wings of the West Pat Butler - owner Sandy Butler - owner Pier Market Sung Kid Park - owner (714) 527-2929 Squeeze Cup Owen Sullivan owner 31 8-1 601 Rosa's Cafe Armando Perez 375-9571 La Playita Restaurant Harold Cohen - owner 376-2148 JB Burgers Margarita Bakolas 376-8909 Sharks Cove Shane Mc colgan - owner Cafe 50's Ken Chang Srivong - owner Kai Supearajit - mgr,contact Hermosa Pizza Marco Salina - owner 372-2285 Fat Face John Bowler - owner 376-0996 Pitcher House Paul Williams 374-8626 Coast Liquor Gordon Patterson - owner Young Patterson - owner 970-0482 Fish Market Cafe Tiem Dang - owner 318-9931 End Zone Bill & Alice Bastian • owner Michael Mc Laughlin - Mgr, contact 374-1 71 7 Bamboo Hut Joang Kim - owner 372-1880 Pier Market Tan Ngo 31 8-591 2 Pier 52 Sal Sebastiano - owner Tom Swires - Mgr, contact 376-1629 Abe's Liquor Yong Sook Yoo - owner 372-2159 Simpson's Market Sang Chang Chef Wong's Jeining Wong - owner Java Man - owner Rick Hankus 379-7209 Sponda's Coffee Marilyn Muter - owner 318-0967 Lappert's Ice Cream Beryl Takabayashi - owner 318-3953 Cantina Real Real Blais - owner 372-3435 Mermaid Restaurant "Boots" Thelan 374-9021 Poop Deck Bill Vasek - owner Mike Hamlon 374-3119 Goodstuff Restaurant Chris Bennett - owner 31 6-21 69 Beach Market Celina Douglas owner Habash Cafe Jay Habash 372-7586 Cafe Santa Fe Phil Romero 545-1242 NOTE - The Beach Hut Cafe and Squeeze Cup already own generators. Only 1 business stated they didn't want to participate, Anello's Sandwiches. I have yet to contact the owners of the businesses listed below, I am still trying to contact them. IHOP, Thai Dishes, Rocky Cola r1 l4 October 11, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of October 25, 1994 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 1995 Y Purpose: To set a schedule for City Council meetings for 1995. Background: City Council meets on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month, except for the month of December when Council meets only once to accommodate the holiday season. At the meeting of June 14, 1994, Council approved staffs suggestion to eliminate one meeting in August 1994. This break in the council meeting/staff report cycle allowed staff to concentrate on "work in progress". This "hiatus" was a very productive time for staff and we would like to repeat it in 1995. Analysis: With a schedule in place for 1995, we would be able to achieve the above mentioned results without overburdening the agendas for the meeting prior to, or following the requested August hiatus. Recommendation: Approve the meeting schedule for 1995. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager lh I I I I I I I I I I I CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 1995 I JANUARY 10, 1995 I JANUARY 24, 1995 I FEBRUARY 14, 1995 I FEBRUARY 28, 1995 I MARCH 14, 1995 I MARCH 28, 1995 APRIL 11, 1995 I. APRIL 25, 1995 MAY 9, 1995 r MAY 23, 1995 I JUNE 13, 1995 JUNE 27, 1995 I JULY 11, 1995 AUGUST 8, 1995 (NO MEE7IN6 ON AUGUST 22, 1995) SEPTEMBER 26, 1995 OCTOBER 10, 1995 I I I I I OCTOBER 24, 1995 I NOVEMBER 14, 1995 I NOVEMBER 28, 1995 I DECEMBER 12, 1995 I (NO MEETING ON DECEMBER 26, 1995) October 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of October 25, 1994 Recommendation: It is recommended by the Downtown Enhancement Commission and staff that Council: 1. Approve the request from the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce to hold open air' jazz concerts" on Pier Avenue between Beach Drive and The Strand on the following dates: Sunday, November 27 Sunday, December 4 Sunday, December 11 Sunday, December 18 2. allow retail merchants on lower Pier Avenue to display goods on the sidewalk area outside their businesses, with the stipulation that a minimum of 36 inches remains clear for pedestrian traffic; and 3. approve the bagging of parking meters to offer two (2) hours of free parking to shoppers between November 21 and December 26, 1994. Background: At the October 5, 1994 meeting, the Downtown Enhancement Commission approved a request from the Chamber of Commerce to hold jazz concerts on lower Pier Avenue to promote business and shopping downtown. The request requires approval to close Pier Avenue from Beach Drive to The Strand from 11:00am to 5:00pm. Pursuant to ordinance # 94-5679, street closures require the approval of the Downtown Enhancement Commission followed by approval from Council. Also at the October 5 meeting, the Commission considered the request from the Chamber to continue a ten year tradition of bagging parking meters in the Downtown area between November 21 and December 26, 1994. The Chamber of Commerce requested three (3) hours of free parking but the Commission recommended free parking be limited to two (2) hours. 1 1i Analysis: At the August 9, 1994 meeting, Council approved a request from the Chamber to hold a series of Street Fairs in November and December. The Chamber has re- evaluated this request. In place of the street fairs, the Chamber has requested permission to host a series of "jazz concerts" on lower Pier Avenue. In an effort to promote goodwill and entertainment for shoppers during the Holiday season, the Chamber has undertaken the development of this event. The event is designed to attract visitors to an area that is normally slow at this particular time of the year. Chamber staff and volunteers will be on hand during the event to oversee the management of the activities. The Chamber has held two larger street fairs this summer which required the closure of Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to The Strand. These were held in conjunction with two professional volleyball tournaments. Both events were successful and well managed. The Chamber worked well with the requests of City staff to ensure that the event ran smoothly. The proposed event staging area, facing east on Pier Avenue, will include a 20 by 20 foot canopy above a 24 inch riser on which musicians will be performing. The concerts will be themed "jazz concerts". In addition, 50 to 75 folding chairs will be set up to provide seating for spectators. Traffic will still be permitted on Pier Avenue but diverted onto Beach Drive. The Downtown Enhancement Commission and staff are recommending the street fair be approved with the following special conditions: • Furnish the City of Hermosa Beach with a certificate of insurance covering comprehensive and general liability in the amount of $1 million dollars. • The Chamber of Commerce will provide professional clean up and trash receptacles during and after the event. • The Chamber of Commerce will be responsible for all event management and administration. • Police officer(s) will be assigned to the event as _deemed necessary by the Chief of Police to ensure proper traffic management. 2 • The Chamber of Commerce will provide and post "No Parking" signs in the affected area and remove signs at the conclusion of the event. Pursuant to the ordinance # 94-5679, the City has the option to charge an additional special event fee. A permit fee of $300 will be charged for administration, set-up and monitoring of the event. This fee is in line with other permits including film permits and other special events. To continue in what has become a holiday tradition in downtown Hermosa, the Chamber of Commerce has requested that parking meters in the downtown area be bagged November 21 through December 26, 1994. The City has historically approved this request as a means of promoting shopping in the downtown area during the holiday season. TOTAL FISCAL IMPACT (Concerts) $1,200 General Fund Revenue TOTAL FISCAL IMPACT (Meters) Undetermined Other alternatives available to Council: 1. Deny request 2. Request additional information Attachments: 1. Letter of request from Chamber Respectfully submitted: ohn A. Newell Recreation Supervisor 3 Concur: Sol Blume Community Development Director M.- . ooney C • mmunity Resources Dire tor Steph R. Burrell City Manager HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (310) 376-0951 • FAX (310) 798-2594 October 3, 1994 Downtown Enhancement Commission c/o Sol Blumenthal, Director of Community Development City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: Request for Chamber Sponsorship of Special Holiday Events Request for Bagging of Parking Meters Dear Commission Members: The holiday season is approaching and the Chamber is planning activities to help attract visitors to the area to enjoy seaside shopping and other activities. To create goodwill, a worry -free shopping and entertainment atmosphere, we request permission to continue the ten-year tradition of bagging meters in the Downtown Business District from November 21 through December 26, 1994, offering three hours free parking. The Chamber of Commerce will provide printed bags for the meters. In addition, we would like permission to host a series of free outdoor jazz concerts to attract visitors to the area during a normally desolate time of year. We request permission for closure of Pier Avenue from Beach Drive west to The Strand from 11 am to 5 pm on the following Sundays: November 27, December 4, December 11 and December 18, 1994. The approximate performance times would be from 12 noon to 4 pm. Vehicle traffic would still be able to drive down Pier Avenue, turning left or right on Beach Drive. October 3, 1994 Downtown Enhancement Commission Page Two Use of four city barricades is also requested to control traffic flow along Beach Drive, which would remain open to vehicular traffic. Our staging area, facing east, will include a 20 foot by 20 foot canopy above a 24 -inch riser on which the musicians will perform. • Approximately 50 to 75 chairs will face the staging area for the audience. This is not a fundraising event. These concerts will incur approximately $7,500 in expenses to the Chamber. On behalf of the retail merchants on lower Pier Avenue, we are requesting they be allowed to display goods on the sidewalk outside their business, with the stipulation that a minimum of 36 inches remains clear on the sidewalk for pedestrians. In order for us to proceed with merchant notification and event promotion, we respectfully request this letter be placed on the October 5, 1994 Downtown Enhancement Commission agenda as an addendum item. We are pleased to offer this family entertainment for our community during the holidays and look forward to your favorable consideration of these requests. Sincerely, Carol K. Duff Executive Director "--*--a2-74 /0-344. 5/---_57e 9 -S- October October 20, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 25, 1994 SUBJECT: COASTAL LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT IN REGARDS TO DOWNTOWN PARKING PURPOSE: TO ACCEPT AND INCORPORATE MODIFICATIONS MADE BY THE COASTAL COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE ATTACHED DOWNTOWN PARKING UTILIZATION SURVEY Recommendation: To adopt the attached resolution to amend the City's Coastal Land Use Plan, incorporating the modifications of the Coastal Commission. To approve the attached downtown parking utilization survey (prepared by IBI consultants) by minute order, in order to comply with the required finding 1(c) of the amended Land Use Plan Background: At the meeting of January 25, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution 94-5657 to amend the City's Coastal Land Use Plan to reduce parking requirements in the Downtown Enhancement District (DED). The proposed amendments were then submitted to the Coastal Commission for certification. For the last several months staff has worked intensively with Coastal Commission staff to obtain full approval of the requested amendments. At their public hearing of October 14, 1994, the California Coastal Commission approved the City's proposed amendments to allow for less required parking in the DED. The approval was made subject to City Council approval of some modifications in the proposed language of the amendments. Analysis Attached is a resolution for adoption incorporating the modifications. The portions that were modified are specifically shown in the attached Coastal Commission staff report pages 3-5. Staff is satisfied that the proposed amendments, as modified, meet the original stated intent of the City Council. The substance of the amendments is basically the same, however, extensive wording added by Coastal staff requires the City to make findings to ensure beach parking will not be reduced, and to place a specific limit on the amount of new commercial development that 1 lj will be allowed under these new parking requirements (96,250 square feet). This amount of build -out was calculated by City staff and agreed to by Coastal staff as an estimate of the amount of new development that will absorb existing parking surpluses, considering the entire supply of Downtown parking and taking into account all the other unique parking factors associated with Downtown as thoroughly explained to the Coastal Commission staff in our original request (e.g. location near a bike path, the high percentage of pedestrians, and shared parking trips). Staff is confident that the findings can be made for all cases, and does not expect these required findings to prevent new development projects. PARKING SURVEY One of the findings that the Coastal Commission will require as a condition for any new Coastal Development Permit is "that the City Council has approved an interim parking study for the DED that shows the occupancy of the parking spaces in the DED is 90% or less during daylight hours on summer weekends." (Finding 1(c)) IBI Consultants prepared a "parking utilization survey" as part of their work on the Downtown Implementation Plan (attached). The survey was conducted on Saturday, August 20, 1994. This survey clearly shows that occupancy was less than 90% for both Area 1 (Lower Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue) and Area 2 (Upper Pier Avenue). Michael chubach Planning Director devatam.,,LAA ILA Sol : umenfelI, D ector Community D:velopment Department Stephen urrell City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Coastal Commission Staff Report 3. Parking Utilization Survey KR/ccsrlup 2 /76/fd en Robertson Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, TO AMEND THE POLICIES OF THE CITY'S CERTIFIED COASTAL LAND USE PLAN IN REGARDS TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN THE DOWNTOWN, AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION 94-5657, AND AS MODIFIED BY THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City Council has held public hearings on December 14, 1993, and January 25, 1994 to consider amendments to the City's Coastal Land Use Plan in regards -to downtown parking policies and the implementation of said policies by adding new zoning provisions to the Municipal Code, and after considering oral and written testimony adopted amendments to the policies contained within the Land Use Plan, by the adoption of Resolution 94-5657; and adopted implementing provisions in the zoning ordinance by the adoption of Ordinance 94-1099; and WHEREAS, the California Coastal Commission reviewed the subject amendments, and certified their approval, subject to the City's acceptance of modifications in the text as set forth in the Hermosa Beach LUP Major Amendment Request No. 1-94; and WHEREAS, the City Council accepts the modifications as set forth by the California Coastal Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY AMEND THE CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE PLAN, MODIFYING RESOLUTION 94-5657 TO INCORPORATE THE MODIFICATIONS OF THE COASTAL COMMISSION? AS FOLLOWS: UNDER B. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ADD THE FOLLOWING GOAL: 6. To recognize the unique parking needs of the pedestrian oriented downtown business area --which are less than a typical commercial area because of its proximity to a regional bike path and to high density residential areas --in order to maximize improvements and expansions to visitor serving business activities without the burden of unnecessary parking 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 regulations and, further, to encourage alternatives to motorized vehicles in reaching downtown destinations. UNDER C(1.) EXISTING POLICIES AND PROGRAMS; AMEND THE FIRST POLICY TO READ AS FOLLOWS: "Policy: The City should not allow the elimination of existing on -street parking or off- street parking spaces within the coastal zone. Future residential and commercial construction should provide the actual parking necessary to meet the demand generated. In the pedestrian oriented downtown commercial district alternatives to providing parking to meet increased demands for use should be allowed, to encourage alternatives to using motorized vehicles and to encourage improvement and enhancement of visitor serving business activities. AMEND THE POLICIES AND PROGRAMS RELATING TO DOWNTOWN (last paragraph of page 4, page 5, and first two paragraphs of page 5a) BY DELETING THE FOLLOWING, AND REPLACING IT WITH THE UNDERLINED TEXT: in the area. fifty (250) squafe feet of commercial uses. In lieu of providing space on site for new construction, development projects will deposit in the VPD No. 1 improvement Fund, one 1980. This program is to be re examined by PAID and/or the VPD in order to ascertain placing a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Vehicle Parking District (VPD)or its successor agency. iii. Acceptance of in lieu fees for parking mitigation shall be geared to a threshold limit on the • .. Program: The City has established the Downtown Enhancement Commission (DEC) to determine the best use of revenue funds for the downtown district which will be recommended to the City Council. The proposed uses are for the acquisition, construction of new parking facilities, and/or the maintenance and operation of existing parking facilities for the benefit of the area; for other improvements and enhancements including, but not limited to: street, landscaping, and pedestrian sidewalk improvements; public events; and the general promotion of business activities in the area. Policy: The City shall establish parking requirements in the Downtown Enhancement District (DED) identical to the requirements set forth in other areas of the City's coastal zone. However in recognition of the unique parking needs and constraints in the downtown district the City may grant exceptions to the parking requirements for new buildings, expansions, and/or intensification of uses within the downtown district if the City can assure that there is parking available within the DED to support beach access and the proposed development. The City may approve exceptions for commercial development up to 96,250 square feet if the findings outlined below are made. After 96,250 square feet of new commercial development has received Coastal Development Permits (CDP), these exceptions cannot be granted unless the Coastal Commission certifies an amendment to the Land Use Plan. Program: New development, including expansions and intensifications of use shall provide parking consistent with requirements elsewhere in the City unless the following finding are made. If the following findings are made, the exceptions described in Section 2, may be granted. 1. Findings Before granting the exceptions below the Community Development Director shall certify: 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 (a) That fewer than 96, 250 square feet of commercial development, including new buildings, expansions and/or intensifications of uses, in the DED has received a CDP since November 1, 1994. (b) That there is currently adequate parking to support the development and provide adequate beach parking (c) That the City Council has approved an interim parking study for the DED that shows the occupancy of the parking spaces in the DED is 90% or less during _ daylight hours on summer weekends , , (d) That no more than 24,063 square feet of commercial development in the DED has received CDP's since the last interim parking study was approved by the City Council 2. Exceptions i. When parking is required for projects on lots exceeding 10,000 square feet and/or 1:1 F.A.R., parking in excess of that existing on the site at the time of the proposal shall be provided at 65% of the current parking requirement ii. Because of the physical constraints to providing parking and the desire to promote a pedestrian orientation in the DED, for projects on lots less than 1:1 F.A.R., no parking other than the parking existing on the site at the time of the proposal shall be required. Program: In order to mitigate the impacts of increased parking demand that is created by new development, but is not compensated for by requiring additional parking spaces, the DEC, or its successor agency or the private party, shall provide an in -lieu fund transfer or an in -lieu fee to an improvement fund earmarked specifically for creating parking, in an amount determined to be sufficient to off -set the increase in required parking spaces caused by the expansion, intensification, or new construction not provided on site. If the DEC determines that the private party is responsible for the in -lieu fee, the private party shall pay said fee as requested by the DEC. Program: The City shall not accept a fee in lieu of providing on site parking unless that the Community Development Director assures that sufficient parking exists to accommodate the parking demand of new development. The improvement fund to mitigate increased parking demand shall be geared to a threshold limit of increased parking demand. The threshold limit shall be established at 100 parking spaces. Program: Parking Validation All new commercial development on any lot within the Downtown Enhancement District shall require participation by the business owner(s) in the parking validation program. Existing 1 2 , 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 development of less that 500 square feet may expand or increase in intensity of use up to 15% without participation in the validation program. The validation program shall provide validation for no less than two hours unless all required parking is provided on site without any parking exceptions specified in Section 2 above or any other parking variances or exceptions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1994, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY h/ccrslup BACKGROUND M TE IA Attachment 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY rb PETE WILSON, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST AREA 245 W. BROADWAY, STE. 380 P.O. BOX 1450 LONG BEACH, CA 90802-4416 (310) 590-5071 September 28, 1994 TO: Commissioners and Interested Persons FROM: Charles Damm, South Coast District Director Teresa Henry, Assistant District Director Pam Emerson, Supervising Analyst, Los Angeles County Area James Ryan, Staff Analyst, J' SUBJECT: Major Amendment Request No. 1-94 to the City of Hermosa Beach certified Land Use Plan (for public hearing and Commission action at the October 11-14, 1994, meeting in Los Angeles). SYNOPSIS Public hearing and action on request by the City of Hermosa Beach to amend the Certified Land Use Plan by reducing parking requirements for the Downtown Commercial District. SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the Commission deny the request to amend the LUP, as submitted, and certify the requested LUP amendment with suggested modifications necessary to bring the amended LUP into conformity with the public access and development provisions of the Coastal Act. The resolutions necessary to adopt the staff recommendation are found on pages two and three of this report. The suggested modifications begin on page three. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Copies of the staff report are available at the South Coast District Office located in the State Veterans Building, 245 West. Broadway, Suite 380, Long Beach, 90802. To obtain copies of the staff report by mail, or for additional information call the Long Beach Office at (310) 590-5071. City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 2 STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for this LUP amendment request, pursuant to Section 30512(c) of the Coastal Act, is that the LUP or any amendments thereto meet the requirements of, and is in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Acta I. DENIAL OF LUP AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED MOTION 1:-. "I move that the Commission certify Land Use Plan amendment 1-92 as submitted by the City of Hermosa Beach." STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends a NQ vote, and the adoption of the following resolution and findings. An affirmative vote by a majority of the appointed Commissioners is needed to pass the motion. RESOLUTION TO DENY CERTIFICATION OF LUP AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: The Commission hereby denies certification of amendment 1-94 to the City of Hermosa Beach Land Use Plan for the reasons discussed below and that the amendment fails to meet the requirements of and does not conform to the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act to the extent necessary to achieve the basic state goals specified in Section 30001.5 of the Coastal Act. II. APPROVAL OF LUP AMENDMENT IF MODIFIED Staff recommends adoption of the following motion and resolution: MOTION II: "I move that the Commission certify the City of Hermosa Beach amended Land Use Plan as modified with the suggestions set out in the staff report." STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a YES vote and the adoption of the following resolution and findings. An affirmative vote a majority of the appointed Commissioners is needed to pass the motion. RESOLUTION TO CERTIFY THE LUP AMENDMENT IF MODIFIED: The Commission hereby certifies amendment 1-94 to the City of Hermosa Beach Land Use Plan subject to the following modifications and adopts the findings stated below on the grounds that, if modified as suggested below, that the amended Land Use Plan meets the requirements of, agd is in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 30200) of the California Coastal Act to the extent necessary to achieve the basic 9 City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 3 state goals specified in Section 30001.5 of the Coastal Act; that the amended Land Use Plan contains a specific access component as required by Section 30500(a) of the Coastal Act; that the amended Land Use Plan is consistent with applicable decisions of the Commission that shall guide local government actions pursuant to Section 30625(c) of the Coastal Act; and that the certification of the amended Land Use Plan meets the requirements of Section 21080.5(d)(2)(i) of the California Environmental Quality Act, as there are no further feasible mitigation measures of feasible alternatives which could substantially lessen significant adverse impacts on the environment. The suggested modifications to the submittal are necessary to achieve the basic state goals set forth in Section 30001.5 of the Coastal Act. III. SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS The Commission suggests the following modifications to the City of Hermosa Beach LUP amendment request which are necessary to ensure that the amended LUP meets the requirements of, and is in conformity with, the policies of Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 30200) of the California Coastal Act. If the City Council of Hermosa Beach adopts and transmits its revisions to the LUP amendment by formal resolution in conformity with the suggested modifications within six months of this Commission action, then the Executive Director shall so notify the Commission along with a finding that the City Council's resolution conforms with the Commission's suggested modifications. If the Commission concurs with the Executive Director's conclusion, the LUP amendment will become effective. In the following suggested modifications, the Commission's suggested additions are indicated by underscoring, and suggested deletions are indicated by ittlKieett. The LUP policies and programs, as submitted by the City, are provided to the Commission in straight type. Certification of the Land Use Plan amendment is subject to the following Suggested Modifications (beginning on p age 5 of the City's certified LUP): Section 2. Program: The City shall establish parking requirements in the Downtown Enhancement District (DED) identical to the requirement set forth in other areas of the City's coastal zone. However, in recognition of 110/ tate§elfE the unique parking needs and constraints in the downtown district, the City may grant exceptions to the parking requirements for new buildings, expansions, and/or intensification of use within the downtown district M11/dd/1M tYifrf/tdedltEd/ilii0Mfdtd/lrf /f Mid/iitil if the City can r h h r i ..rkin• .v.il.41• wi hin h DED n h .r ••v-l..m n • h fin • • . • • d ••v-1••men Th i m. .•.r•v • .1 of 2s • f. •fnw lin-, •-low r mad . Af r 2 1 0v 1..mn Prmi • in • • ••v•1•.m n h. r iv • I. • I !!• n mm r i.1 • f nn • a r n Land Use Plan. .• nl h • . 1 • mmi i • n r ifi • • r ••. , • f • r • •'v•1••m'i fnw DP h x • mm i m n•m•n i • n Ip Policy: City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 4 h.11 w•m•n - •whi• n following findings are made If the following findings are made the •exceptions described in Section 2 may be granted 1: Findings Before granting the exceptions below. the Planning Director shall certify: la/ That fewer than 96.250 sq. ft. of commercial development. including new.buildings. expansions and/or intensification of uses. in the DED has received a CDP since November 1. 1994. Shl That there is currently adequate.parking to support the development and provide adequate beach parking. That the City Council has approved an interim parking stu•y for the DED that shows the occupancy of the parking spaces in the DED is 90% or less during daylight hours on summer weekends. That no more than 24.063 sq. ft. of commercial development in the DED has received CDP's since the last interim parking study was approved by the City Council. . Exceptions i. When parking is required, for projects on lots exceeding 10.000 sq. ft. and/or 1:1 F.A.R., parking in excess of that existing on the site at the time of the proposal shall be provided at 65% of the current parking_ requirement. 9f/tMill/be/Bg%/df/fbe/teelditethedf/Wief/fdtfb/fdt df bet/dte�t/�1tP1S/fbe/21tj ii. PtdjeEff/lid/dthillet/ldff/Olfbid/Elie/WdWd/dfiftltfl Because of the physical constraints to providing parking and the desire to promote a pedestrian orientation in the Downtown Enhancement District. for projects on lots less than 10.000 sq. ft. and less than 1:1 F.A.R.,_ no Parking other than the parking existing on the site at the time of the Proposal shall be required. chill/def/be/teeldited/f00/06tide/idl/OitKidVObed fNe/flddt/dtei/fd/belld16§/tifld/ii/0606fed/fd/be/111/6t/teff! Program: In order to mitigate the impacts of increased parking demand that is created by new development, but is not compensated for by requiring additional parking spaces, the DBAEDC or its successor agency or the private party, shall provide an in -lieu fund transfer or an in -lieu fee to an improvement fund earmarked specifically for creating parking in an amount determined to be sufficient to off -set the increase in required parking spaces caused by the expansion, intensification, or new construction not provided onsite. If the DBAEDC determines that the private party is responsible for the in -lieu fee, the private party shall pay said fee as requested by the DBAEDC. 11 City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 5 Program: The City shall not accept a fee in lieu of providing on site narking unless the Planning Director assures that sufficient parkina exists to accommodate the arking demand of new development The improvement fund to mitigate increased parking demand shall be geared to a threshold limit of increased parking demand. The threshold limit shall be established at 100 parking spaces. Program: Parking Validation All new commercial development on any lot within the Downtown Enhancement Di ri h.11 r •uir •ar i i,. ion • h• •usin• •wn•r in h• •.rkin v.li f.m or increase in intensity of use UD to 15% without participating in the v.l'•. i• •r..r.m. Th • v.li•. i•n •r••r.m h.11 •r•vi•• v.1'•. i•n f.r less than two hours unless all required parking is provided on site without any narking exceptions specified in Section 2 above or any other parkina variances or exceptions. IV. FINDINGS The following findings support the Commission's resolution for DENIAL of the LUP amendment as submitted, and APPROVAL of the LUP amendment if it is modified as indicated in Section III (the Suggested Modifications) above. The Commission hereby finds and declares as follows: A. AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND On August 19, 1981, the Commission certified, with suggested modifications, the City of Hermosa Beach Land Use Plan (LUP). Those modifications regarding parking/access and shoreline structures have been accepted and agreed to by the City of Hermosa Beach. The previously certified LUP required one parking space per 250 sq. ft. of commercial area for projects located in the downtown, Vehicle Parking District (VPD). The proposed LUP amendment will reduce parking requirements in the City's Downtown Commercial District. Attached as Exhibit C is the City's resolution specifically describing those changes. Very briefly, the proposed policies provide that: 1. Commercial development on lots that are less than 10,000 sq. feet that are developed to less than 1:1 floor area to building area would require no additional parking for intensification or expansion, as long as the building remains less than 1:1 Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.). 2. Parking standards for larger structures shall not be imposed for the first 1:1 F.A.R., and then, in Downtown, the additional parking shall be required, but at a rate 65% of that required in other areas of the City. 3. Developers that need parking can provide a fee in lieu of parking. There is a new policy that allows the parking district management to donate in. lieu fee credits at the discretion of the management of the parking district. City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 6 4. No more than 100 in -lieu fees may be collected. After 100 "spaces" have been purchased, the developer or the City or a private party will have to build parking. It is the City's intent to monitor parking, but this intent is not in the suggested LUP amendment. 5. All existing on -street and off-street parking shall be preserved. The proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan along with the City's resolution, includes a reference to a new section of the City's zoning code. The City has not previously submitted its implementation measures as part of the Local Coastal Program. Therefore, the proposed zoning measures, which are being submitted now for reference, will be reviewed and certified by the Commission at a future time. According to the City, the purpose of the proposed amendment is to recognize the unique characteristics of the downtown area in terms of its collective parking needs and the interdependent relationships of the businesses with the use of the public pier and beach. Additionally the City contends that the existing in -lieu parking program, with a cost of approximately $8,000 per required parking space, discourages development and has not provided any additional parking spaces since the LUP was certified twelve years ago. The City has consistently granted exemptions to the fee requirement because the price is prohibitive for the small projects that have been developed in Hermosa's downtown. The City further contends that the three existing public parking lots, which provide 347 parking spaces, are under-utilized. Following is some background information as submitted by the City: Existing policies and programs of the LUP state that parking cannot be reduced, and that parking demand created by residential and commercial development must not interfere with beach access parking. The LUP establishes the minimum commercial parking requirement as one space per 250 square feet of commercial area. The only language that allows for waiving commercial parking requirements is in the Vehicle Parking District when an in -lieu fee is paid for each required space not provided. The City is proposing to change the language of the LUP, as set forth in the attached resolution. The changes include an added "goal and objective" to recognize the unique parking needs of the downtown, and a modification to "existing policies and programs" to allow and encourage alternatives to parking for meeting increased demands for the use. More importantly, proposed new programs would lessen parking requirements in the downtown area as follows: - No parking required on smaller lots when the floor area to building area ratio is 1:1 or less When parking is required, .it shall be at 65% of requirements for elsewhere in the city. Further, the parking in -lieu fee program would be retained,.with an added option that downtown parking revenues could be used to pay the fee. Other LUP policies, including an existing policy that protects all private and public parking spaces, would not be changed. 13 4f City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 7 B. COASTAL ACCESS POLICIES Assuring public access to and along the shoreline is one of the strongest mandates of the Coastal Act. Several Coastal Act policies require the Commission to protect beach access: Section 30210 of the Coastal Act states: In carrying out the requirement of Section 4 of Article X of the California Constitution, maximum access, which shall be conspicuously posted, and recreational opportunities shall be provided for all the people consistent with public safety needs and the need to protect public rights, rights of private property owners, and natural resource areas from overuse. (Amended by Ch. 1075, States. 1978.) Section 30211 of the Coastal Act states: Development shall not interfere with the public's right of access to the sea where acquired through use or legislative authorization, including, but not limited to, the use of dry sand and rocky coastal beaches to the first line of terrestrial vegetation. Section 30212 states, in part: (a) Public access from the nearest public roadway to the shoreline and along the coast shall be provided in new development ... Section 30252 of the Coastal Act states: The location and amount of new development should maintain and enhance public access to the coast by (1) facilitating the provision or extension of transit service, (2) providing commercial facilities within or adjoining residential development or in other areas that will minimize the use of coastal access roads, (3) providing non—automobile circulation within the development, (4) providing adequate parking facilities or providing substitute means of serving the development with public transportation, (5) assuring.the potential for public transit for high intensity uses such as high—rise office buildings, and by (6) assuring that the recreational needs of new residents will not overload nearby coastal recreation areas by correlating the amount of development with local park acquisition and development plans with the provision of onsite recreational facilities to serve the new dev-elopment. Additionally, the relevant parking provisions of the City's certified LUP are as follows: A. Statement of Philosophy To preserve and increase, where feasible, residential, commercial, and general public parking within the Coastal Zone. City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 8 B. Goals and Objectives 1. To provide adequate residential parking. 2. To maintain adequate parking space for both visitor and shoppers. 3. To provide easy access to work-related parking for merchants. 4. To maximize the safety and accessibility of parking while minimizing noise, traffic congestion and negative visual impacts. 5. To provide an equitable distribution and allocation of parking . resources. . . C. Policies and Programs 1. Policy: That the City should not allow the elimination of existing on -street parking or off-street parking spaces within the coastal zone. Future residential and commercial construction should provide the actual parking necessary to meet the demand generated. The City's certified LUP requires that all new development or intensifications of use provide one parking space per 250 square feet of commercial use. The proposed LUP amendment will reduce parking on smaller lots. When parking is required in the downtown, it would be 65% of the parking standards elsewhere in the City (one space per 385 sq. ft. of commercial use). The LUP also provides that all existing parking spaces, public and private, be preserved. On lots that are less than 10,000 sq. ft., all applicants are required to save existing parking but if development is less than 1:1, the applicant is not required to provide any additional parking either on or off-site. Development on larger lots or greater intensity would also be required to save all existing on-site spaces. Parking for larger developments would not be required for the first 1:1 F.A.R., and then, parking shall be required, but at a rate 65% of that required in other areas of the City. Most of the urbanized coastline in Los Angeles and Orange Counties is within small cities. In many, like Hermosa Beach, the beach is publicly owned and access is limited by the transportation system, which for people in the Los Angeles basin means the automobile. Many of these small cities, including Hermosa Beach, were subdivided in the time of the street railways and have inadequate provisions for cars. The inadequate provisions for cars includes narrow streets and very little off-street parking. Additionally, historic downtown subdivision and development practices have restricted adequate provisions of off-street private parking spaces. This has resulted in a shortage of parking due to competing peak hour and seasonal parking demands of beach -goers, customers of commercial establishments and the surrounding residential uses which range from low to high density. In order to mitigate these parking conflicts, the City has established a beach parking program that �5 City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 9 limits parking on residential streets and encourages beach goers to use 541 free parking spaces located on remote lots. On May 18, 1982, the Commission conditionally approved a permit for the implementation of a preferential parking and remote beach parking program for the City of Hermosa Beach. According to the City, the program has been "designed to reduce traffic and parking impacts by reallocating the beach visitor demand to an area of the City that can better meet the need." This is done through raising prices for commercial spaces and providing free parking in remote beach parking lots. If a visitor does not want to take advantage of this remote parking, a daily - parking permit may be purchased enabling the visitor to park in the impacted area for a certain fee. These proposed standards were developed according to a recent parking study completed by the City. The 65% figure is based on a City survey which found that only 65% of commercial customers drove to the downtown area. The proposed small lot exemption up to a 1:1 F.A.R. is similar to a requirement contained within a recent City of Manhattan Beach Local Implementation Plan (1-93), which was certified by the Commission in February, 1993. Following is some background information as submitted by the City of Hermosa Beach: The existing regulations that require parking for all new development or intensification of uses (1 parking space per 250 square feet for retail/office or 1 per 100 square feet for restaurant) makes it costly, if not impossible, for property owners to improve or enhance their existing properties. However, in reducing parking requirements on small lots, the city realizes that some limits need to be established to assure that over—development, or lack of parking is not the result. As such, the. standard of a 1:1 floor area to lot area ratio is used as a maximum. This method simply uses an easily recognizable standard --the amount of commercial land area --as the maximum amount of development prior to absolutely requiring added parking supply. This part of the proposal (the small lot exemption up to a 1:1 F.A.R.) is similar to the parking standard used by the city of Manhattan Beach for its similarly situated coastal downtown district. The basic premise is that a certain scale of development can be accommodated by existing "collective" parking facilities spread throughout a district. Further contributing factors that apply in both cities are as follows: (a) both, commercial districts are surrounded by medium and high density residential districts making walking and biking to commercial destinations a realistic and feasible alternative to automobiles, and; (b) many of the commercial activities (restaurants, beach rentals, beachwear clothing shops) are interdependent with the use of the public beach and the Strand. As such, suburban parking standards which assume most customers drive, and that separate uses are exclusive, should not apply. (See appendix V for the analysis of the number of parking spaces) Based on the above, it logically follows that when parking is required (for the area over a 1:1 F.A.R. or development on larger lots) the standardsthat apply to other commercial areas should not apply in the coastal downtown district. Therefore, based on surveys. of the City's downtown which found that about 65% of respondents drove to the area, it I( City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 10 is proposed that parking be required at 65% of the standard which applies elsewhere in the city. This is further supported by studies on mixed use commercial shopping centers which generally show that only 40-75% of required parking is needed when different uses with different peak time demands share the same parking. Under the proposed 65% rule the parking standard for retail office is 1 space per 385 square feet, and for restaurant 1 space per 154 square feet. The Commission must find that the proposed LUP amendment does not reduce beach access, and that it will not have significant adverse impacts, either individually or cumulatively on coastal resources. The coastal resource here is parking; public street parking spaces. The downtown beach/pier area currently serves as a major visitor destination point for recreational purposes. Given this resource, it is important that future development be carefully evaluated so as to protect, preserve and enhance public access to these recreational facilities. The area affected by the amendment centers around the intersection of Hermosa/Pier Avenue_and includes the adjacent public beach/pier area. Public parking is provided by 528 on -street parking spaces and 347 spaces located in public parking lots. In addition, there are 775 existing off-street parking spaces. The new downtown business district contains more parking spaces than the previous downtown area. Following is a brief description of the new. downtown area as submitted—by the City: ..recently, the City changed the boundaries of what was known as the Vehicle Parking District (VPD) to include all of Pier Avenue from Manhattan Avenue to Valley drive. The name of the district was also changed to Downtown Enhancement District (DED). --This is generally considered the downtown. The intent was to ultimately implement the "R/UDAT" plan. The R/UDAT plan includes guidelines which address the parking needs of customers, residents and beach -goers.... Public access to the Hermosa Beach coast is strongly influenced by the adjacent and nearby commercial intensity of development. .The Hermosa Beach downtown business area is presently 53% built -out and contains 350,776 sq. ft. of existing commercial development. Theoretically, the downtown area could be expanded to accommodate a total of approximately 994,884 sq. ft. of commercial development, based on current zoning. That amount of buildout would create a parking deficit of 434 parking spaces based on the City's revised estimate of 65% of the City standards. The amount of allowable development downtown, greatly exceeds available parking (See Exhibit F). The City's submittal does not adequately address the cumulative impacts on beach parking if an additional potential buildout of approximately 644,068 sq. ft. of additional development were permitted with reduced parking. The Coastal Act requires the protection of public access to the -coast. As currently proposed, the LUP amendment does not adequately protect and enhance public access/recreation opportunities as required by the Coastal Act. The proposed LUP Amendment, which permits extensive commercial'development without City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 11 requiring additional parking, is inadequate to achieve the basic Coastal Act goal of maximizing public access to the beach and does not ensure that development will not interfere with the public's right of access to the sea. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed LUP amendment policies, as submitted, must be denied. The Commission further finds that the proposed LUP amendment is not consistent with Sections 30211 and 30252 of the Coastal Act which require that new development enhance and not interfere with public access to the coast and must be denied. After receiving staff comments, the City,submitted additional information regarding parking requirements if the downtown commercial area ultimately expanded from 350,776 sq. ft. with reduced parking requirements. The City staff parking. analysis indicates that there is an existing surplus of 250 parking spaces which could accommodate approximately 96,250 sq. ft. of new commercial development based on 65% of current zoning requirements. The downtown parking use study (See Exhibit F) estimates that on a typical summer weekend there are at least 250 vacant spaces downtown even when street parking is 90% occupied. This surplus comports with theoretical surplus of 250 spaces that the City has computed by comparing existing square footage to 65% of the previous standard. The survey considers all downtown street parking available both for beach users and commercial customers. Therefore, in recognition of potential adverse cumulative impacts on nearby beach parking, staff is recommending a suggested modification that the subject Land Use Plan amendment be limited to a total buildout cap of 96,250 sq. ft. That buildout is also consistent with a recent City economic market analysis that estimated the amount of expected business opportunities up to the year 2004 would be in the range of 59,900 to 132,400 sq. ft. If the LUP policies are modified consistent with the suggested modifications stated in Section III of this report, to assure that sufficient parking exists within the Downtown Enhancement District to accommodate new development and beach parking, the modified LUP policies will be consistent with the access - provisions of the Coastal Act. As modified, the LUP amendment will permit reduced parking requirements up to a limit of 96,250 sq. ft. of new commercial development. The 250 "extra" spaces will be applied to this interim development. Because the figures the City used are projections based on current car usage, the Commission can only approve a reduced rate if the granting of exceptions is accompanied by a monitoring program. The modified policies require three interim studies on parking availability. In addition, the suggested modifications require that the City find that a surplus is available before an exception is granted. Also, as modified, the LUP amendment will require the City to conduct parking availability studies to assure that new development will provide adequate parking. Therefore, the Commission finds that, as modified, the LUP amendment will assure that there is adequate parking available in the Downtown Enhancement District to support both future commercial development and public beach parking, consistent with the relevant access provisions of the Coastal Act. W As modified, the amended LUP allows development when physical constraints City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 12 limit on—site parking to pay in—lieu fees for parking mitigation. This policy would be in effect until the City has sold 100 spaces. After that, spaces would have to be provided. The City's in—lieu fee parking program, which amounts to approximately $8,000 per space, has never been applied because the price of the spaces exceeds the likely income of local businesses. However, the proposed amendment will retain this program as a parking mitigation option. Existing LUP policies for commercial uses require preservation of existing on—street and off—street parking spaces and a separation of long—term (beach user) and short—term (shopper) in order to provide adequate parking within the downtown area of the City. However, the -cost of parking in the public lots is $2.00 more per hour than the metered on—street spaces. Background studies supplied by the City indicate that the cost differential discourages shoppers to use the public lots. If the existing public parking lots are under—utilized for commercial parking, on—street beach parking for beach goers will be further restricted. The City has argued that small development, less than 1:1, actually shares parking with other development, and therefore needs to provide no parking. The shared parking will not occur unless all businesses, large or small, encourage the customers they actually attract to use the district lots. The only way to assure that each development small or large pays its share of parking costs, is to require that all new development encourages its customers to park on the City lots. Therefore, staff is recommending a suggested modification requiring the City to develop a customer validation program. All new development, even those exempt from providing additional parking, are required to validate their customers' to use the lots where vacant spaces are located. Therefore, the inexpensive street spaces will be reserved for beach users. Only as modified, to provide an adequate validation program, can the Commission find that the proposed amendment will not interfere with public access to the shoreline consistent with Sections 30211 and 30212.5 of the Coastal Act. The Commission further finds that, as modified, the proposed LUP amendment will provide adequate parking consistent with Section 30252 (4) of the Coastal Act. C. Consistency with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Section 13096 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations requires Commission approval of a Land Use Plan Amendment to be supported by a finding showing the permit, as modified, to be consistent with any applicable requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Section 21080.5(d)(2)(i) of CEQA prohibits a proposed LUP amendment from being approved if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact which the activity may have on the environment. The proposed LUP amendment has been modified in order to be found consistent with the public access and development policies of the Coastal Act. Mitigation measures, which include suggested modifications to assure that City of Hermosa Beach Major LUP Amendment 1-94 Page 13 adequate parking exists within the downtown area to accommodate both new development and public beach parking, will minimize all adverse impacts. As modified, there are no feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact which the activity may have on the environment. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed LUP amendment can be found consistent with the requirements of the Coastal Act to conform to CEQA. 2921F I • •••11111 Harnloam Downtown Perking Study Ar LEGEND ElCommercial (C-2) Downtown Parking Study Area v." • ; ge• ip" 0-J4 et 1,1° A-0614 fts: t • ft:It afe • 1. 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION 94- 5691 z 0 Lb) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BE4L`H, CA1L jORNIA SUBMITTING AMENDMENTS TO THE POLICIES OF THE CITY'S CERTIFIED COASTAL LAND USE PLAN TO THE CALIFORNIA COASTKCLit@Rt1MISSION, FOR THEIR REVIEW AND APPROVAL COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council has held public hearings on December 14, 1993, and January 25, 1994 to consider amendments to the city's coastal Land Use Plan in regards to downtown parking policies and the implementation of said policies by adding new zoning provisions to the Municipal Code, and after considering oral and written testimony adopted • amendments to the policies contained within the Land Use Plan, by the adoption of Resolution 94-5657; and adopted implementing provisions in the zoning ordinance by the adoption of • Ordinance 94-1009; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to submit the amended policies incorporating a reference to the implementing zoning provisions, to the California Coastal Commission for its review and approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council gave full consideration to the proposed amendments at properly noticed and advertised public hearings and the City Council approved the proposed amendments at a properly noticed and advertised public hearing with 'findings to support the amendments as contained in Resolution 94-5657; and WHEREAS, the implementation of these amended policies was considered at the same time as the Land Use Plan policy amendments, and adopted by amending the city's zoning ordinance by adding, Section 1152.5 as set forth in Ordinance No. 94-1099; • NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY RESOLVE TO SUBMIT AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S COASTAL LAND USE PLAN AS ADOPTED IN RESOLUTION 94-5657, AS FOLLOWS, AND TO INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE THE IMPLEMENTING ZONING PROVISIONS AS SET FORTH T' ORDIN§NCE 94- 1099, AS FOLLOWS: f{c.-►'� ♦,)1 a „ 4 ; )1; t 23 1 2 3 _4 $ 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE - •HERMOSA BEACH CERTIFIED LAND USE PLAN UNDER B. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ADD THE FOLLOWING GOAL: . 6. To recognize the unique parking needs of the pedestrian oriented downtown business Area --which are less than a typical commercial area because of its proximity to a regional bike path and to high density residential areas—in order to maximize improvements and expansions to visitor serving business activities without the burden of unnecessary parking regulations and. further, to encourage alternatives to motorized vehicles in reaching downtown destinations. • • UNDER C(1.) EXISTING POLICIES AND PROGRAMS; AMEND THE FIRST POLICY TO READ AS FOLLOWS "Policy: The City should not allow the elimination of existing on -street parking or off- street parking spaces within the coastal zone. Future residential and commercial construction should provide the actual parking necessary to meet the demand generated. In the pedestrian oriented downtown commercial district alternatives to providing parking to meet increased demands for use should be allowed, to encourage alternatives to using motorized vehicles and to encourage improvement and enhancement of visitor serving business activities. AMEND THE POLICIES AND PROGRAMS RELATING TO DOWNTOWN (last paragraph of page 4, page 5, and first two paragraphs of page 5a) BY DELETING THE FOLLOWING, AND REPLACING IT WITH THE UNDERLINED TEXT: r. . ••• . p 24 ^qllY ,911t.'C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Program: The City has established the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District 19 Commission (DBAEDC) to determine the best use of revenue funds for the downtown district 20 which will be recommended to the City Council. The proposed uses are for the acquisition, construction efnew .arkinfacilities and/or the maintenance and o•eration of existin..arkin. 21 facilities for the benefit of the area: for other improvements and enhancements including but not limited to: street. landsca in , and pedestrian sidewalk improvements;.public events: and the 22 general promotion of business activities in the area 23 24 Program: To recognize the unique parking needs and constraints in the downtown district parking requirements for new buildings. expansions. and/or intensification of uses within the.downtown 25 district shall be less than required elsewhere in the city as follows (as prescribed in Section 1152.5 of the zoning ordinance): 27 When parking is required it shall be 65% of the requirement as set forth for other areas within the City 26 28 29 Projects on smaller lots within the downtown district, because of the physical constraints to providing parking and the desire to promote a pedestrian orientation shall not be emuired to provide any parking when the floor area to lot area ratio s posed to b .1 or less. ' 34. 0041.6A 4-'x4.6;1` c. 2s 3• 1 2 4 5 Pro • ram: In order to miti • ate the im acts of increased arkin • demand that is created b new devel o�mentbut is not compensated for by requiring additional parking spaces the DBAEDC or its successor a • en or the .rivate shall •rovide an in -lieu fund transfer or an in -lieu fee . an improvement fund earmarked specifically for creating parking, in an amount determined to k_e sufficient to off -set the increase in re.uired •arkin• .aces caused b the ex.ansion intensification or new construction not rovided on.ite. art • 6 If the DBAEDC determines that the .rivate .a is res•onsible for the in -lieu fee the •rivate party shall pay said fee as requested by the DBAEDc 7 Pro • am: The im.rovement fund to miti • ate increased •arkin • demand shall be • eared to a e threshold limit of increased parkin demand. The threshold limit shall be established at 100 9 parking spaces, . 10 11 12 IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE 13 The above proposed amendments to the certified Land Use Plan include a reference the following proposed new section of the zoning code: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Section 1152.5 Parking Requirements for the Downtown Area The following requirements apply within the boundary of the downtown area, as defined by the map incorporated herein. A. The amount of parking shall be calculated at 65% of the parking required for,each particular use as set forth in Section 1152. B. Building sites equal to or less than 10,000 square feet: If the floor area to lot area ratio is 1:1 or less no parking is required. If the floor area to lot area ratio exceeds 1:1 only the excess floor area over the 1:1 ratio shall be considered in determining the required parking pursuant to sub -section A. . C. Bicycle racks/facilities shall be provided and/or maintained in conjunction with any ' intensification of use, or new construction, in an amount and location to the satisfaction of the Planning Director." M YOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California Z to AS TO • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF HERHOSA BEACH.. I, Naoma Valdes, Deputy^_City. ._Clerk of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-5691 was duly and regularly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of -Hermosa Beach at a Regular Meeting of said Council at the regular place thereof on June 28, 1994. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: DATED: The vote was as Benz, Bowler, None None None June 29, 1994 follows: Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton 21 lierpou-rs --q y x� rt S'd'f- . s" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 requl.ement for bicycle parking for a of transportation significa - 'mpact on the to encourage alte nati will result in less th environment, • more specifical with the incorpo - ion of said m less than significant gation measure will have parking in the downtown bas on the findings n• = above i ection B and C; NOW, EFORE, the City Council of •e City of Hermc Beach, - ifornia, hereby amends the Coastal C. -'ssion-certifi Lan• se P an, subject, to final a mission a�l�.�� approval b the Coast. 'POSei Get • GeS ci SECTION I: Amend the policies of the certified Land Use P1 Section III to read as follows: Under B. Goals and Objectives add the following: "6. To recognize the unique parking needs of the pedestri oriented downtown business area --which are less than typical commercial area because of its proximity to regional bike path and to high density residenti areas --in order to maximize improvements and expansic to visitor sepving business activities without t burden of unnecessary parking regulations and, furthe to encourage alternatives to motorized vehicles reaching downtown destinations. Under C.(1.) Existing Policies and Programs; amend the fir policy to read as follows "Policy: The City should not allow the elimination existing on -street parking or off-street parking spac within the coastal zone. Future residential and commerci construction should provide the actual parking necessary meet the demand generated. In the pedestrian orient downtown commercial district alternatives to providi-- parking to meet increased demands for use should be allowe to encourage alternatives to using motorized vehicles and encourage improvement• and enhancement of visitor servi business activities. a. SECION 2. Amend the policies and programs relating to downto parking to read as follows•(replacing the last paragraph on pa 4, the entire page 5, and the first two paragraphs of page 5a): "Program: The City ras established the Downtown Busine Area Enhancement District Commission (DBAEDC) to determi the best use of revenue funds for the downtown district whi will be recommended to the City Council. The proposed us are for the acquisition, construction -of new parks facilities, and/or the maintenance and operation of exists parking facilities for the benefit of the area; •for oth: improvements and enhancements incluc ng but not limited t street landscapin• and •edestrian sidewalk im•rovement -, a 1 2 3 4 '5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 t Y YO) EL* • G Ft p.t4 cwPg Ct, publi( events; and the genetc promotion of busine activities in the area" -. Program: To recognize the uniaue parking needs t constraints in the downtown district, parking requiremer for new buildings, expansions, andJ or intensification of u: within the downtown district shall be less than requir elsewhere in the City. i. When parking is required, it shall be 65% of 1 requirement as set forth for. other areas within the C ii. -'Projects on smaller lots within the downtown distri( because of the physical constraints to providing park and the desire to promote a pedestrian orientation-sh not be required, -to provide any parking when the fl( area to building ratio is proposed to be 1:1 or less. .Program: In order t� mitigate the impacts of increa: -parking demand that is created by new development, but is compensated for by requiring additional parking spaces, • DBAEDC, or itssuccessor agency or the private party, sh, provide an in -lieu fund transfer or an in -lieu fee to improvement fund earmarked specifically for creating parki in -an amount determined to be sufficient to off -set increase in required parking spaces caused by the expansi, intensification, or new construction not provided on site. If the DBAEDC determines that the private party responsible for the in -lieu fee, the private party shall • said fee as requested by the DBAEDC Program: The improvement fund to mitigate increased park .demand shall be neared to a threshold limit of increa parking demand. The threshold limit shall be established 100 parking spaces. SECTION 3 This Resolution supursedes Resolution 93-5646 PASSED, APPROVED, an OPTED this 25th day of January, 19 PRESIDEN o the City • Hermo a Beach, Californi ATTEST: r)I and MAYOR of the City CITY CLERK 1- 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ack..4!� ` /'�� CITY ATTORNEY p/perspark z1 fiermo3k et's- v4 .c-`iit:s-rl �,� :o^���M..:n'�. ''?-t-' •'c332 .+4 '. •-__i.+�::il�•�� Axl sri N � III. Parking Access Summary A. Statement of Philosophy -3- To preserve and increase, where feasible, residential, commercial, -and general public parking within the Coastal Zone. B. Goals and Objectives 1. To provide adequate residential parking. 2. To maintain adequate parking space for both visitor and shoppers. 3. To provide easy access to work-related parking for merchants. 4. To- maximize the safety and accessibility of parking while minimizing noise, traffic congestion and negative visual impacts. 5. To provide an equitable distribution and allocation of parking resources. C. Policies and Programs Hermosa's particular history of development is reflected in the following policies and programs. Policies have been divided into those policies that are now in force and currently supported by codes and ordinance and those policies that the City should consider for enactment. 1. Existing Policies and Programs Policy: That the City should not allow the elimination of existing on -street parking or off-street parking spaces within the coastal zone. Future residential and commercial construction should provide the actual parking necessary to meet the demand generated. - tte,„,„. /.-qct 1blt 0 3 F? 3o • -S45TIN('. -4- Program: Current City Building Codes and Ordinances support the current policy Two on-site parking spaces are required for each residence that is constructed, with an additional guest space provided per every three units constructed. Replacement of parking spaces is mandatory for all new developments in which on -street parking spaces are eliminated or the total number of on -street parking spaces are reduced. Policy: That the City should control congestion through the granting of parking permits through an allocation plan which reflects actual need and supply. Program: The City has enacted a permit plan to control parking congestion. Permits are available to both residents on a long-term basis and non-residents on a short-term basis. Program: Free parking will be provided to beach visitors on the railroad right-of-way. Policy: That a separation of long-term (beach user) and short-term (shoppers) parking be created in the downtown area to provide adequate and flexible number of parking spaces for commercial demand. Program: A study is being done by the VPD to develop a downtown parking plan. _ Program: The manner in which time is purchased in each of the downtown parking lots determines how the lots will be used. Policy: The City has enacted the Parking & Improvement District to determine the best use of revenue funds for the downtown district which will be recommended to the City Council. The proposed uses are for acquisition, construction, or maintenance of parking facilities for the benefit of the area; decoration of any public events which are to take place in public places in the area; furnishing of music in any public place in the area and the general promotion of business activities in the area. 31 esea.g,t 47/0+7 .. Pcisiitslcv -5- Program: All new buildings or additions to • existing buildings Within the Vehicle Parking. existing. Distric(VPD) No. 1 are currently required to provide parking in a'ratio.of one (1) space per two hundred fifty (250) square feeet of commercial uses. In lieu of providing space on-site for new construction, development projects will deposit in the VPD No. 1 Improvement Fund, one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500.00) for each required • space not provided. This one thousand five hundred dollar_ amount Is to increase in line with . consumer price index percentage for construction in the Los Angeles -Long Beach SMSA starting with.a base from January 1, 1980. This program is to be re-examined by PAID and/or the VPD in order to ascertain placing a limit on the amount of dollars or parking spaces to be granted in the future. The following policies shall apply in the admini- stration of the VPD program: •• i. New commercial development or expansion' or intensification of existing commer- cial facilities shall be permitted only if the applicant on such a project has committed himself/herself to participate in a program which would function to provide parking spaces on site, in the . amount of 1 space per 250 sq. ft. of commercial area. With respect to restau- rants and other uses which generate greater than usual demand for parking, the LUP shall specify: additional miti- gation measures such as bicycle parking spaces or additional off-site parking within a convenient distance and the like. Exceptions may be made for small restaurants or other uses that do not operateduring peak parking demand periods which would assure that beach parking/access in the commercial area • would not be impaired. Such a program ,• shall assure that the number of parking spaces available to beach users after•the development is completed is equal to or greater than the number of spaces -avail- able prior to the development. ii. If physical constraints limit the provi- sion of commercial parking spaces on site, the applicant shall commit himself/herself to a program of mitigation for the number of parking spaces not provided. "'Such a program shall be the payment of in -lieu fees to the Vehicle Parking District (VPD)= or its successor agency. Ex�� ss\J'iii. Acceptance of in -lieu fees for parking f mitigation shall be geared to a threshold limit on the increased parking This threshold limit shall beestablished at 100 spaces greater than the existing deficit of 76 spaces'in the VPD. iv. Accurate records shall be maintained regarding all parking spaces available in the City. The City may designate the VPD or its successor agency to maintain an accurate record of spaces within its jurisdiction. At such time as the threshold limit has been reached, the City. shall embark on a program to reduce the ' parking deficit below the threshold limit. Policy: That the city has the responsibility to. insure the safety of its citizens by removing vehicles which are parked in illegal parking spaces and may pose a threat to the safety of . its citizens and/or guests. Program: Within the Motor Vehicles and Traffic Codes of the City and the State, specific regulations have been outlined for curbing violations_regarding illegal parking of vehicles 2. Future Policies �x►Son r�G -5a- That the City should investigate and, where feasible, enact the following policies. _ Policy: City should consider land donations or equivalent for parking as part of a condominium conversion. Policy: City should consider establishing a fee in lieu of providing additional parking on-site for curb cuts. Policy: That the City should investigate the possibility of lease or purchase of parking lots dispersed throughout the City so as to minimize the impact on the parking demand to the City and.its residents. Policy: City should examine the current status of' public lands leased and the rents received. P:vi 5 01/4 eio-d6-v4 '-OXY ; e;(416;t- a .47 33 ,E.)4 ts an oc,-- .6- Policy: That the City should consider converting City streets with. two-way traffic with parking on one side into one-waystreets with parking on two sides. Policy: That the City should consider the reorienta- tion of the City's current transportation service so as to provide transit service for visitors and residents according to their needs. IV. COASTAL HOUSING A. • Statement of Philosophy The City of Hermosa Beach shall maintain its current diversified housing environment. The City also recognizes the need to address certain housing policies which relate to the replacement and protection of existing housing and the provision of new housing. .These policies must be addressed on a City-wide basis and as such will be dealt with in the Housing Element of the General Plan as mandated by.State law. B. Goals and Objectives 1. To preserve the City's existing diversified mix of age and income groups. 2. To preserve the City's existing diversified neighborhoods. 3. To promote and encourage the conservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of the City's existing housing stock. C. Policies and Programs Hermosa's particular history of housing is reflected in the following policies and programs. Policies have been divided between those that are now in force and currently supported by codes and ordinances' and those policies that the City should consider for enactment.. 1. Existing Policies and Programs - There shall be no discrimination in Policy: housing. i 3`- //coin+ss.. es 41.,1 4•-e7"' • 744 WCL 1J•GJ 3 .ba. I' WI ...+r••.+•••••... • -�.... • II .... .. 4. ..-..+L1 HERMOSA BEACH / MANHATTAN BEACH DOWNTOWN COMPARISON Hermosa Beach Manhattan Beach 1093 Planning Dept Estimates (entire downtown, including civic canter) Public Works Dept Downtown Parking Study Update, 1990 (entire downtown. including civic center) Coastal L.U.P. (Within downtown eras vehicle perking dlstriots) Commercial Land Commercial Building Office Retail Restaurant Ratio (F.A.R.) Total Parking Public Parking lots On -street Private off- street Parking Ratio 750,000 SQ. FT. 850,000 SQ. FT. 55,550 153.550 50,000 0.47 1,550 - 347 528 775 1 per 212 sq. Ft. of commercial building *859,000 SQ. FT. 387,059 SQ. FT. 151,958 177,224 57,577 0.68 1,704 723 484,000 SQ. FT. 243,800 SQ. FT. 72,000 151,600 20,000 0.60 1,148 327 495 451 485 580 1 per 227 eq. FL Of 1 per 212 aq.ft. of commercial bldg commercial bldg *Estimation by adding 176,000 square feet of land area for civic cantor to Y.P.O. total land area Prepared by Hermosa Beach Planning Department hctort 0Jh ITC, -L A f -Ty 3S SEP -15-'94 THU 16:43 ID:CITY OF HERMOSABEACH TEL NO:1-310-372-6186 14998 P07 . MEMORANDUM To: Pam Emerson, Supervising Analyst, California Coastal Commission From: , Sol Blumenfeld, Director*mmunity Development Department p p Subject: Proposed Development Threshold - Land Use Amendment No. 6 City of Hermosa Beach Dates September 14, 1994 Pursuant to out meeting of September 7, 1994, I am providing the attached development threshold tabulation for providing parking at the 65% parking ratio proposed in the City' s Land Use Amendment No. 6. The proposal would apply to projects at a 1:1 F.A.R. and exceeding 10,000 square feet. The proposed threshold is commensurate with the expected development intensity for the Downtown over the next ten years. As we discussed, the City can expect no more than a range of 59,900 to 132,400 square feet of new commercial development over the next ten years based upon projections developed in a recently completed market study. I have attached a copy of the draft document summary for your review. In addition, I have attached another copy of the City's build -out scenarios for reference with the new tabulation. The development threshold tabulation is based upon the fbllowing calculation: • • • The ezLting commercial development buildout is approximately 350,000 sq. ft. • Total parking at the current buildout is 1,650 parking spaces. • Providing parking at the ratio of 1 space per 250 square feet of development (as currently required) would yield 1,400 parking spaces and the surplus number of spaces would be 250 spaces (1,650 -1,400.250). 3 1 • The City's current parking requirement is 4 stalls:1000 (1:250). • 9 65% of 4 stalls • 2.6 stalls, IBM • 2.6 • 384.6 or 385 sq. ft. (added dev. per stall) . C • 1:385 proposed parking to building ratio. • 250 s 385 sq. ft... 96,250 eq. ft. of additional dev. under parking proposal. y I Thus 96,250 sq, ft. of added development would be permitted as the development1 Mfg threshold based upon 65% of the City's current parking requirement. As we discussed, 4- v upon reaching the development threshold, Downtown development projects would be 0 t4 subject to further Coastal Commission review relative to parking. The City would need to 0 provide the Coastal Commission with an assessment of buildout intensity and demonstrates E via parking survey, that parking was adequately supplied to the area. Notwithstanding )( s these measures, the City would implement a parking validation system to provide greater II, V parking efficiency in Downtown parking lots. Please let me know if this proposal is 'V acceptable as soon as possible. Thank you. 3, • Development Threshold Existing Developed Commercial Area 350,000 square feet Existing Total Parking 1650 Parking Needed at 1/250 parking/bldg ratio 1400 Surplus Parking 250 Issue: How much added development will absorb parking surplus? Eased on L.U.P requirement of 1 parking space per 250 square abet, and based on City's study that 65% of users arrive by car, each parking space will support an additional 385 square feat of development. 250 X 385 sq. Ft. -31 96,250 square feet ofadded development. *1 space per 385 square feet is the ratio obtain when applying 65% of the 1 space per 250 square fat requirement. It should be further noted that this is a conservative estimate of the absorption rate as some development will provide added parking spaces. Note: This estimated buildout is consistent with the recent market study prepared for the downtown which projected between 59,900 and 132,400 square feet by the year 2004.- -- a.af,p e r � u 3 /J .c #cc, L to A+ •..d ott e.,-� 3'I Coastal Commission Land Use Amendment Supplcrncntnry Report Page 3 PARKING COMPARISONS UNDER DIFFERENT BUILD -OUT SCENARIOS AND DIFFERENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS , k tk' , S�2fYe v�;,iz +''' , a� t {p.ggb J �'t.'�,tkti M 'xrx� ?c� ' J 12.,, Y'. r �rr+:,1S1',. r, t' '�c ;Ki1t2t!t.-,',*;.. (�t'r"tt.. ` �i S n � d. s „:,;!),f1�(.'(l4. !'�xx�+� .GilEt]Ii �i. r _. `,r S, ,.. fi�[l, t „ ( 1y •..err d i ( ,. �..-���M��tt �.. 3 T is,..., , 3:1 F,A R t3 !t . t � , ,> > ?.2 .t s it" r�.1 � a f r .., tNEtteiti' .5.., O%opa4dn t. �pp t i 1 : ,F! ( if ,( 1 tet '(( ,r(� ((�[O * :. �J� -, Y �w/�F i6sV�// -y_1Y { .., g • ;t t.r 5:1 F'A.R, � a ft a a, • l(f> (r���,rf,�� ,,...e. - S ypot a �/� list �.✓{ VL�i�tLA� i '.' �^ D/• : i34 {.}.�,* f r �,} , r ifs, i/Ft ?u4�Y4i�. lj rff' •L 0 PsifSC1G Building Sq. Footage TOTAL PARKING Private Off -creek Public on -street Public loss• PARKING m BUILDINO RA770 In-lieuparking spaces PARKING/B UILIDNG RATIO W7TH CREDIT FOR IN-LIFUSPACFS 350,776 1650 775 328 347 1:212 sq. ft. 0 1:212 �.ft' 663,229 "2046 1171 528 347 1;524 sq.ft. 136 1:304 nit. 663,229 "1851 • 976 528 347 1:558 sq. ft. 70 1:345 sq. ft. 994,844 **2531""2150 1656 S28 347 1:393 sq. ft. 528 1:325 sq ft. 994,844 1275 528 347 1:462 sq. ft. 314 1:405 sq.ft. "100% parking' calculates resulting parking bsed on the requirement of 100% of required parking for lots >10,000 spare feet, and development over 1:1 on its <10,000 square feet "65% parking" calculates resulting parking based on requiring 65% of required parking for lots >10,000 square feet and development over 1:1 on lots<10,000 square feet. • Reflects the nun of existing parking plus added private off-street parking that would be required on lots >10,000 square feet, if built to 1:1 (since lots <10,000 square feet if built 1:1 do not require any added parking) "Reflects the sum of existing parking plus added private off-street parking that would be required on lots >10,000 square feet, it built 1,5:1, and the added parking required on lots <10,000 square feet, if built 1.5:1, for the amount of development over 1:1. . NOTE: In order to obtain the most accurate and realistic representation of what might happen under these build -out scenarios, hypothetical build -out was assigned to each parcel in the downtown and the resulting number of required �, added parking spaces was thus calcuated for each parecel considering the number of existing spaces. This table reflects the summation of the results for each lot. Assumptions; The number of existing off-street parking spaces will not be reduced on any lot Provision of parking spaces was calculated based on 1 per 250 square feet offloor area, with ratio of on-site vs lieu parking calculated pursuant to Section 1167 of the zoning code, as follows: • Lots > 12,000 square feet' all parking provided on-site • Lots between 4,000 & 12,000 sq. Ft 30% on -cite / 50% in- lieu fee • Lots < 4,000 square het 25% on-site / 75% in -lieu fee New development will occur on existing building sites (i.e. no assembly or separation of existing parcels Usting public parking areas to remain as public parking only, and thus not included as deivelopable land arca • 3 4n) tS 0 6 6 di 6 6 4 * • 4 4 4 4 4* lir 4 4; 4 1L 4 4 4 W u Il Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan—Parking Study £ luawy3ei1d Off -Street On -Street Totals Block Private Time of Day Public Time of Day Metered Time o Day Totals Time of Day 10:00 12:30 2:00 4:00 10:00 12:30 2:00 4:00 10:00 12:30 2:00 4:00 10:00 12:30 2:00 4:00 6 42 47% 52% 52% 50% 20 25%. 100% 80% 85% 27 55% 48% 100% 93% 78% 89 44% 78% 70% 66% 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ' 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 13 15% 39% 54% 46% 0 — — — — 27 93% 85% 85% 40 38% 75% 75% 75% 3 33% 66% 33% 66% 0 — — — — ' 21 100% 95% 95% 86% 24 92% 92% 88% 83% 21 67% 95% 72% 67% 0 — — — — 22 55% 86% 95% 95% 43 56% 91% 84% 81% 7 43% 29% — 57% 29% 0 — — — — 21 0 76% 81% 90% 86% 28 68% 68% 82% 71% 0 — — — 0 — — — — 53% 9 0 33% 33% 33% 56% — — — 57% 62% 25% 59% — 0 0 135 44 0 0 0 — — — — — — .87% 77% — — — -- 64% - — — 76% 66% — — — — 47% — 17 0- 33 22 3 65% 88% 94% 88% 82% 88% 26 69% 69% 77% — — — — — — 61% 46% 50% 0 0 23 13 4 — 53% 84% 50% — — — — 67% 68% 85% 168 66 26 38 29 56% 86% 86% 72% — 40% 46% — 52% 46% 50% 72% 27% — 100% 100% 73% 100% 92% 86% 67% 41% 46% 65% 68% 67% 58% 73% 82% 76% 65% 76% 73% 58% 76% 100% — — - 25 25 8 30 76% 88% 84% 50% 72% 88% 84% ,76% 79% 69% 36 81% 78% — 0 119 100% 63% 71% 100% 90% 100% 100% 83% 44 149 84% 77% 82% 66% 0 — — 19% 42% — 67% 28% 52% 64% 54% 31 68% 74% 81% 71% 0 — 27 100% 100% 100% 58 71% 86% 90% 85% 19 100% 89% 89% 100% 0 — — — — 0 — — — — 19 100% 89% 89% 100% 6 33% 33% 0% 0% 0 — — — — 4 100% 100% 100% 100% 10 60% 60% 40% 40% 0 0 0 32 51 0 — — — — 0 — — — — — — — — — 9 9 15 89% 89% 100% 89% 9 89% 89% 100% 89% — — — — 0 — — — 67% 87% 100% 100% 100% 9 67% 100% 100% 100% — — — — 0 — 93% 87% 93% 15 87% 93% 87% 93% 22% 27% — 28% 27% — 38% 45% — 28% 51% — 0 — — — — — 43 27 12 77% 37% 50% 79% -81% 58% 79% 84% 74% 75 78 12 53% 57% 62% 60% 0 0 — — — — — 74% 83% 31% 46% 55% 59% — 83% 50% 58% 83% 83% Totals 310 45% 50% 53% 51% 318 35% 65% 76% 64% 427 68% 89% 85% 85% 1055 52% 70% 73% 71% Note: Based on aerial photo taken on Satu day August 20th, 1994. £ luawy3ei1d Hermosa Beach Downtown Implementation Plan—Parking Study m D z —t r— N D 0 z N m .r .1'.' 1!.) ,, ��, tai t111.$ice$ t . 1.1 IPJ 1ri1 l°‘/ (9) l0/ \w. i 1 ----1 -1 1 -1 ---1 -,- ‘#) \lj lI) V Note: Based on aerial photo taken on Saturday August 20th, 1994. Off -Street On -Street Totals Block Private Time of Day Public Time of Day Metered Time of Day Totals Time of Day 10:00 12:30 2:00 4:00 10:00 12:30 2:00 4:00 10:00 12:30 2:00 4:00 10:00 12:30 2:00 4:00 1 2 3 4 5 30 31 32 33 34 35 39 39 13% 21% 62% 21% _39% 50% 10% 44% 21% 61% 54% 0 — — — — 11 45 0% 56% 88% 19% 96% 27% 82% 36% 50 10% 20% 14% 24% 0 0 0 — — — — 62% 84 40% 69% 34% 62% 13 77% — — — — — — — 8 88% 100% 100% 21 71% 52% 86% 71% 5 40% 60% 20% 40% — — 4 25% 50% 50% 50% 9 33% 55% 33% 44% 2 45 9 8 0 41 25 50% 100% 50% 50% 0 — — — 8 75% 100% 100% 138% 10 70% 100% 90% 80% 18% 22% 24% 20% 33% 27% 56% 0 — — _ — — — - — — - — 7 100% 58% 86% 42% 88% 100% 100% 52 21 29% 32% 31% 37% 33% 0 0 0 — — 12 8 92% 100% 75% 92% 42% 38% 66% 76% 38% 0% 12% 8% 38% 0% 15% 50% 0% 38% 0% 15% 16% — — — - — — — 75% 100% 75% 16 56% 69% 69% 69% — — 4 25% 65% 38% 75% 4 25% 75% 75% 75% 15% 20% 0 0 — 17 13 88% 88% 54% 59% 58 28% 36% 36% 28% 12% — — 46% 46% 38 18% 24% 32% 26% Totals 226 19% 26% 26% 32% 0 — — — — 137 55% 76% 80% 69% 363 33% 48% 46% 46% Note: Based on aerial photo taken on Saturday August 20th, 1994. DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION BOUNDARY STUDY AREA MAP Hermosa Beach Downtown Implententatkm Plan—Parknig 4-1 Page 1"-8 +k, • October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting October 25, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 94-1113 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION PREVENTION CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT REQUIREMENTS." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 94-1113, relating to the above subject. This ordinance was initially introduced by Council at its meeting of July 12, 1994, with the understanding that the title and body of the document would require modification for codification purposes. The revised ordinance was presented to Council for consideration at the meeting of October 11, 1994, where it was re -introduced, as revised, by the following vote: AYES: Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None ABSENT: Oakes ABSTAIN: None Elaine Doerfling,city erk y� Noted: Stephen R. Bur R'l , City Manager ORDINANCE NO. 94-1113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION PREVENTION CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States (hereinafter "Congress") has determined that pollutants contained in storm water and urban runoff are responsible for the environmental degradation of oceans, lakes, rivers, and other waters of the United States. WHEREAS, Congress, in 1987, amended the Clean Water Act of 1972 to reduce pollutants discharged into the waters of the United States by extending National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (hereinafter "NPDES") requirements to regulate storm water and urban runoff discharge into municipal storm drain systems. WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach (hereinafter "City"), along with. other municipalities of Los Angeles County, has elected to become a co -permittee to the NPDES municipal permit held by the County of Los Angeles. WHEREAS, the City, as an NPDES municipal co -permittee, is required to develop and implement within its jurisdiction "best management practices" (hereinafter referred ' to as "BMPs") that shall, to the maximum extent practicable, reduce pollutant concentrations discharged into Santa Monica Bay by way of storm water and urban runoff. WHEREAS, the City is also committed to the prevention of further degradation of Santa Monica Bay, wherein pollutants conveyed by storm water and urban runoff threaten to endanger marine life and pose health risks to those who make recreational contact in, and consume food from its waters. NOW, 'THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'I'HE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Artide I Title, Purpose, and General Provisions This chapter shall be entitled the "City of Hermosa Beach Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Control Ordinance" and shall be known as such throughout the code. Section 1: Purpose and Intent The purpose of this chapter is to protect the health and safety of those who recreate in and consume food from Santa Monica Bay, a water of the United States, and to protect marine habitats and ecosystems existing therein by: (a) Reducing non -storm water discharge to the municipal storm water system to the maximum extent practicable. (b) Eliminating the spillage, dumping, and disposal of significant materials into municipal storm water system. (c) Reducing pollutant loads in storm water and urban runofly to the maximum extent practicable, by requiring the implementation of BMPs and evaluating the efficacy of such practices against water quality objectives established by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region. The intent of this chapter is to enhance and protect the water quality of Santa Monica Bay and receiving waters of the United States in a manner that is consistent with the Clean Water Act. Section 2: Definitions The following are definitions of terms used in this chapter: (a) (b) "Storm water" runoff means any surface or water flow produced by rain. - "Urban runoff" means surface water flow produced by non -storm water resulting from residential, commercial and industrial activities involving the use of potable and non -potable water. (c) "Non -storm water discharge" means any fluid that is not composed entirely of storm water. (d) "Significant" material means any substance including but not limited to: garbage -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and debris; lawn clippings, leaves, and other vegetation; biological and fecal waste; mortar; sediment and sludge; manure and other fertilizers, pesticides, oil, grease; gasoline; paints, solvents, cleaners, and any fluid or solid containing toxic or nontoxic chemicals, or heavy metals; used batteries; or anything that contains such significant materials or to which such significant materials may attach. (e) "Municipal storm water system" means those facilities within the City by which storm water discharge is conveyed to waters of the United States, including but (f) (g) not limited to flood control channels, roads with drainage systems, streets, catch basins, inlets, curbs, ditches, gutters, storm drains, canals, pipes, and fabricated and natural channels. "Illicit discharge" shall mean any discharge to the storm drain system that is not composed entirely of storm water runoff except discharges made pursuant to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit or as otherwise authorized by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. "Illicit connection" means any device through or by which non -storm water is discharged into the municipal storm water system, including but not limited to floor drains, pipes of any fabricated or natural conduits which have not been authorized by the City or County Department of Public Works. "NPDES" means "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System." "Best Management Practice" or (BMPs) shall mean schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, general good housekeeping practices, maintenance procedures, educational programs, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants directly or indirectly to waters of the United States. BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control plant site runoff spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, and drainage from raw materials storage, The California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks for Municipal, Industrial/Commercial and Construction Activity provide a detailed discussion of BMPs. -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0) (k) (I) "Person", shall mean any natural person, firm, association; club, organization, corporation, partnership, business trust, company or other entity which is recognized by law as the subject of rights or duties. "Owner", applied to a building or land, means any part owners, joint owner, tenant in common, tenant in partnership, joint tenant or tenant by the entirety of the whole or of a part of such building or land. "Pollutant" shall mean anything which causes the deterioration of water quality such that it impairs subsequent and/or competing uses the water. Pollutants may include but are not limited to paints, oil and other automotive fluids, soil, rubbish, trash, garbage, debris, refuse, waste, fecal coliform, fecal streptococcus, enterococcus, heavy metals, hazardous waste, chemicals, fresh concrete, yard waste from commercial landscaping operations, animal waste, materials that result from the process of constructing a building or structure, nauseous or offensive matter of any kind. (m) "Premises" shall mean any building, lot, parcel of land, land or portion of land whether improved or unimproved. Section 3: Responsibility for Administration This Ordinance shall be administered by the City Director of Public Works. Section 4: Regulatory Consistency This Ordinance shall be construed to assure consistency with the requirements of the federal Clean Water Act and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, applicable implementing regulations, and any existing or future municipal NPDES Permits and any amendments, revisions or reissuance thereof. Section 5: Severability If any provision, clause, sentence, or paragraph of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person, establishment, or circumstances shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions or application of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, an to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 declared to be severable. Artide II Discharge Prohibitions and Requirements Section 1: Illicit Discharges and Connections (a) No person shall cause any illicit discharge to enter the municipal storm water system unless such discharge (i) consists of non -storm water that is authorized by an NPDES point source permit obtained from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region provided that the discharger is in full compliance with all requirements of the permit or waiver and other applicable laws or regulation. (ii) is associated with fire fighting activities or exempted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region; or (iii) is deemed by the City's Director of Public Works or designee to be necessary to public health, safety, or welfare. Discharges not subject to this provision when properly managed as determined by the Director of Public Works include: water line flushing and other discharges from potable water sources, diverted stream flows, rising ground waters, infiltration to separate storm drains, uncontaminated pumped ground water, air conditioning condensations, springs, residential swimming pool discharges, and dechlorinated swimming pool discharges from public and private swimming pools. (b) "Illicit Connections". It is a violation of this ordinance to establish, use, maintain, or continue illicit drainage connections to the City and County storm drain system, or to commence or continue any illicit discharges to the City and County drain system. This prohibition against illicit connections is expressly retroactive and applies to connections made in the past, regardless of whether permissible under the law or practices applicable or prevailing at the time of the connection. Section 2: Illegal Disposal (a) No person shall place any significant material into the Pacific Ocean or any -5- component of the municipal storm water system or into any street, road, alley catch basin, culvert, curb, gutter, inlet, ditch, natural watercourse, flood control channel, canal, storm drain, pipe, or any fabricated or natural conveyance that may transport the significant material into the waters of the Pacific Ocean. Section 3: Reduction of Pollutants in Storm Water (a) No vehicle, machinery, or device shall be allowed to leak, spill or discharge in any manner oil, grease, coolant, or other significant material onto any -street, alley, road, parking lot, or surface in the City whereon pollutants contained in or on significant materials can or may be conveyed into the municipal storm water or Pacific Ocean by storm water or non -storm water runoff. (b) Objects such as vehicle motor parts containing grease, oil or other hazardous substances, and unsealed receptacles containing significant materials, shall not be stored in areas susceptible to storm water runoff. (c) Any machine which is to be repaired or maintained in an uncovered outdoor area shall be placed on a pad of absorbent material to contain leaks, spills, or small discharges. (d) Machinery and equipment, including motor vehicles, which are leaking significant amounts of oil or fluid must be repaired. (e) The uncovered outdoor storage of unsealed containers containing significant materials is prohibited in areas susceptible to runoff. Section 4: Control of Pollutants from Construction Activities (a) All persons and businesses engaged in construction activity within the City shall operate in compliance with all state and federal laws regulating or pertaining to stormwater management and runoff including operating with all required permits. b) No person shall commence or continue any construction activity in the City that causes the disturbance of five acres or more of soil by clearing, grading, and excavating without demonstrating to the City's Building Division that such person has obtained an NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water -6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Permit (hereinafter "construction permit") from SWRCB. NPDES construction activity does not include (i) routine maintenance to maintain original line and grade, or (ii) emergency construction activities required to protect the public health and safety. (c) Any person engaged in a construction activity in the City requiring an NPDES construction permit shall retain at the construction site the following documents (i) a copy of the Notice of Intent to comply with Terms of the General Permit to Discharge Water Associated with Construction Activity; (ii) a waste discharge identification number issued by the SWRCB; and (iii) a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and Monitoring Program Plan for the construction activity requiring the construction permit. (d) Any person engaged in a construction activity in the city requiring an NPDES construction permit shall provide any of the documents described in paragraph (b) of this section to the City. (e) Prior to the issuance of any building permit for construction for new development or for remodeling or rehabilitation of existing structures, the City Public Works Department shall evaluate the proposed project to determine its potential to generate the flow of significant materials into the municipal storm water system and the Pacific Ocean both during and after construction. Based upon this evaluation, the City may require conditions placed upon the issuance of the building permit to minimize the risk of significant materials flowing into the municipal storm water system and the Pacific Ocean. The imposition of conditions under this section shall be based on the standards set forth in most recent addition of the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks (Municipal and Construction Handbooks, specifically the appropriate sections of each handbook for Best Management Practice selection, source controls, and treatment controls), the City's Municipal Storm Water Program Implementation Manual, and such additional standards as determined by the City. -7- 1 (f) The following requirements shall apply to all projects undergoing construction in the City. The requirements set forth below shall apply at the time of demolition of an existing structure or commencement of construction and until receipt of a certificate of occupancy: (1) Runoff containing sediment, construction waste and other pollutants from construction sites and parking areas shall be reduced to the maximum extent practicable. (2) Where determined necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works or his or her designated representative, a temporary sediment barrier shall be installed. (3) Between October 1 and April 1 plastic or other covering shall be utilized to prevent erosion of an otherwise unprotected area, along with additional runoff control devices if necessary to intercept and safely convey the runoff. (4) Excavated soil shall be located on the site in a manner that minimizes the amount of sediments running into the street or adjoining properties. Soil piles shall be covered until the soil is either used or removed. (5) No washing of construction or other industrial vehicles shall be allowed adjacent to a construction site. No water from washing vehicles on a construction site is allowed to run off into the City's storm drain system. (6) Drainage controls shall be utilized as needed, depending on the extent of proposed grading and topography of the site, including but not limited to the following: (i) Detention ponds, sediment ponds, or infiltration pits. (ii) Dikes, filter berms or ditches. (iii) Downdrains, chutes or flumes. The City may, as a condition of granting a construction permit, set forth reasonable limits on the clearing of vegetation from construction sites, including, (g) -8- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 but not limited to, regulating the length of time during which soil may be bare, and, in certain sensitive cases, prohibiting bare soil. Section 5: Control of Pollutants from Industrial Sources (a) All persons and businesses within the City shall operate in compliance with all state and federal laws regulating or pertaining to stormwater management and runoff including operating with all required permits. (b) Industries that require an NPDES General Industrial Activities Storm Water Permit shall retain on-site the following documents which evidence compliance with permit requirements: (i) a copy of a Notice of Intent to comply with the terms of the General Permit to Discharge Storm Water Associated with Industrial Activity issued by SWRCB; (ii) a waste discharge identification number issued by the SWRCB; and (iii) a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and Monitoring Program plan; and (iv) any storm water quality data. (c) Any industry in the City requiring an NPDES General Industrial Activities Storm Water Permit shall, upon request from a duly authorized officer of the City, provide any of the documents described in paragraph (a) of this section. (d) The City may require conditions placed upon the issuance of any permit to any commercial or industrial facility to minimize the risk of significant materials flowing into the municipal stormwater system and the Pacific Ocean. The imposition of conditions under this section shall be based upon the standards set forth in the most recent addition of the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks (Municipal and Industrial/Commercial Handbooks, specifically the appropriate sections of each handbook for Best Management Practice selection, source controls, and treatment controls), the City's Municipal Storm Water Program Implementation Manual and such additional standards as determined by the City. Section 6: Littering (a) No person shall throw, deposit, place, leave, maintain, keep or permit to be -9- thrown, deposited, placed, left or maintained or kept, any refuse, rubbish, garbage or any other discarded or abandoned objects, articles or accumulations in or upon any street, alley, sidewalk, storm drain, inlet, catch basin conduit or drainage structure, business place, or upon any public or private plot of land in the City, so that the same might be or become a pollutant, except in containers, recycling bags, or other lawfully established waste disposal facilities. Section 7: Blowing Debris (a) No person shall use or operate any mechanical device to blow leaves, dirt, or other debris in or upon any street, alley, sidewalk, parkway, or other public right- of-way. Section 8: Disposal of Landscape Debris (a) No person shall intentionally dispose of leaves, dirt or other landscape debris into a storm drain. Article III Inspection and Enforcement Section 1: Inspection (a) Authority to Inspect. The Director of Public Works, building officials, and representatives thereof, are hereby authorized and directed to enforce all provisions of this chapter. Right of Entry. Whenever necessary to make an inspection to enforce any of the provisions of this chapter, or whenever an authorized enforcement officer has reasonable cause to believe that there exists in any building or upon any premises any condition which constitutes a violation of the provision of this Chapter, the officer may enter such building or premises at all reasonable times to inspect the same or perform any duty imposed upon the officer by this Chapter; provided that (i) if such building or premises be occupied, he or she shall first present proper credentials and request entry; and (ii) if such building or premises be unoccupied, he or she shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or (b) -10- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 other persons having charge or control of the building or premises and request entry. Any such request for entry shall state that the property owner or occupant has the right to refuse entry and that in the event such entry is refused, inspection may be made only upon issuance of an inspection warrant. In the event the owner and/or occupant refuses entry after such request has been made, the officer is hereby empowered to seek assistance from any court of competent jurisdiction in obtaining such entry. (c) Authority to Conduct Samplings and Establishing Sampling Devices. With the consent of the owner or occupant or pursuant to an inspection warrant, any authorized enforcement officer may establish on any property such devices as necessary to conduct sampling and monitoring activities necessary to determining the concentrations of pollutants in storm water and/or non -storm water runoff. During all inspections as provided herein, the authorized enforcement officer may take any samples deemed necessary. (d) Requirement to Sample or Monitor. Any authorized enforcement officer may order that any person engaged in any activity and/or owning or operating any facility which may cause or contribute to storm water pollution of contamination, illicit discharges, and/or discharge of non -storm water to the storm water system, undertake such monitoring activities and/or analyses and furnish such reports as the officer may specify. All costs incurred for such activity shall be borne by the party ordered to do the sampling. In the event the owner or operator of a facility subject to a monitoring and/or analyses order fails to conduct required monitoring and/or analyses and furnish the required reports in the form required, the Authorized Enforcement Officer may cause such monitoring and/or analyses and the cost, therefore, including the reasonable additional administrative costs incurred by the City shall, be borne by the owner of the property and the cost thereof shall be invoiced to the owner of the property. If the invoice is not paid within sixty (60) days of the issuance thereof, the costs shall be a lien upon and -11- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 against the property and continue in existence until the same shall be paid. If the lien is not satisfied by the owner of the property within three (3) months after the completion by an Authorized Enforcement Officer of the required monitoring and/or analyses and reports, the property may be sold in satisfaction thereof in a like manner as other real property is sold under execution. (e) Facility Inspections. Every restaurant, gas station, automobile repair facility, nursery, lumber yard, car wash, warehouse, grocery store, repair shop, dry cleaning facility, and launderette for which a license or permit has been issued by the City shall be periodically inspected by a representative of the Director of Public Works. Inspections shall be conducted no less than once every year and as often as necessary to insure compliance with this Chapter as the Director of Public Works deems appropriate. Section 2: Enforcement (a) The Director of Public Works, or his/her designee, is authorized to enforce this Chapter as follows: (i) For the first failure to comply with any provision contained in this Chapter, the Department of Public Works shall issue to the affected person a written notice which includes the following information: (1) a statement specifying the violation committed; (2) a specified time period within which the affected person must correct the failure or file a written notice disputing the notice of failure to comply; (3) a statement of the penalty for continued non-compliance. (ii) Each subsequent failure to comply with any provision of this Chapter following written notice pursuant to Section i, shall constitute an infraction and shall be punishable by a penalty of one hundred dollars per day of violation for the first cited violation and five hundred dollars per day for subsequent violations. (iii) It shall not be a defense to the assessment of any penalty or to any other -12- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 civil enforcement action, provided for under this Section for a person to assert that any violation of this Chapter was caused by the actions of a person other than the person assessed except if the violation was caused by the criminal or negligent action of a person who was not an agent, servant, employee or family member of the person. (iv) Any penalty collected hereunder shall be used as reimbursement for the Department of Public Works; costs and expenses of administration, inspection and enforcement of this Chapter. (vi) A violation of any provision of this Chapter is declared to be a public nuisance. The City may abate such violation(s) by means of a civil action with all costs for such abatement to be borne by the party responsible for the nuisance. (vii) The penalties and remedies established by this chapter shall be cumulative. (b) Other Penalties. Any person who violates any provision of this Chapter, any provision of any permit issued pursuant to this Chapter, or who discharges waste or wastewater which causes pollution, or who violates any cease and desist order, prohibition, or effluent limitation, may also be in violation of the federal Clean Water Act and/or Porter -Cologne Act and may be subject to the sanctions of those Acts including civil and criminal penalties. (c) Citizen Reporting. Members of the public shall be encouraged to report possible violations of this Chapter to the City Public Works Department. Article IV Adoption Provisions Section 1. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the city council at which the same is passed and adopted. -13- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 2. The City Clerk shall cause a summary of this Ordinance to be prepared by the City Attorney and published as provided by law. The summary shall be published and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which this Ordinance is to be adopted. Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause a summary to be published with the names of those City Council members voting for and against this Ordinance and shall post in the Office of the City Clerk a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 25th day of October , 1994. President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Clerk , City Attorney -14- a-d-ot,a7z- October 18, 1994 City Council Meeting October 25, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 94-1119 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OFFENSES - MISCELLANEOUS, SECTION 21-23 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON STREETS, PLAYGROUNDS OR PLACES OPEN TO THE PUBLIC." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 94-1119, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of October 11, 1994, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration, and was then introduced by the following vote: AYES: Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None ABSENT: Oakes ABSTAIN: None • �B e Elaine Doerfling, ity erk Noted: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager 2b ORDINANCE NO. 94-1119 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OFFENSES -MISCELLANEOUS, SECTION 21-23 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON STREETS, PLAYGROUNDS OR PLACES OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. WHEREAS, the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 21 Offenses, Miscellaneous, Section 21-23. Consumption of alcoholic beverages on streets, playgrounds or places open to the public prohibits the drinking and opening of containers of alcoholic beverages upon any street, sidewalk or parkway, park playground, or in any public place, or in any place open to the patronage of the public, when not licensed for the consumption of such liquor, WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of allowing consumption of alcoholic beverages on certain city owned outdoor public facilities subject to a permit approved by the City Council when requested by qualified nonprofit groups only; WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of clearing up the ambiguity that currently exists regarding the licenses and permits required for fully enclosed city owned public facilities (i.e. buildings) and outdoor city owned public facilities; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Chapter 21, "OFFENSES -MISCELLANEOUS" Section 21.23. Entitled "Consumption of alcoholic beverages on streets, playgrounds, or places open to the public" of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended by adding additional subsections (g) and (h) to read as follows: "(g) The above provisions of (a) and (f) shall not apply to fully enclosed city owned public facilities (i.e. buildings) when a license has been obtained for the consumption of such liquor. (h) The above provisions of (a) and (f) shall not apply to outdoor city owned public facilities when a license has been obtained for the consumption of such liquor and when a permit has been approved by the City Council. Application for said permits may be made only by qualified nonprofit organizations. Guidelines for said permits shall be adopted by Resolution of the City Council and authority for permit issuance may be delegated to a particular Department of the City. if permit issuance is delegated to a particular Department of the City, appeal may be made to the City Council and a Hearing held thereon. The decision of the City Council shall be final." Section 2. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. Section 3. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October, 1994. by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney -2- Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 94-3 AND TEXT AMENDMENT PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO THE 17 -FOOT GARAGE/PARKING STALL SETBACK REQUIREMENT INITIATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation a7 5 to-Lze9 September 27, 1994 Regular Meeting of October 11 1994 To introduce the attached ordinance amending the 17 -foot setback requirement for garages to measure from the edge of the nearest public improvement (sidewalk, curb or street) rather than} the property line. Background At their meeting of July 5, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended the subject amendment. Prior to that meeting the Commission considered several other options. At their meeting of February 22, 1994, the City Council initiated the subject study to give property owners more flexibility towards achieving the maximum and best use of their property. For further background please refer to the Planning Commission staff report and the 2/15/94 memo to the City Council. Analysis The proposed modification to measure the 17 -foot setback from the edge of the sidewalk, or the nearest public improvement where there is no sidewalk, would improve flexibility on many lots in the City where extra right-of-way width extends well beyond the sidewalk. Please refer to the attached graphic for two fairly simple examples of the different result that would be achieved under the proposed change. This graphic includes the examples of a 60' right-of-way with a 54' wide street and sidewalk improvement and a 80' right-of-way with a 54' wide street/sidewalk improvement. Obviously there would be other variations on these examples. 4 Staff has also added a sentence to the proposed amendment to cover the unusual situation that exists on a few streets within the city where public sidewalks are planned, but have not been completed, or are only partially completed for a street segment. In these situations, the setback should be consistent for the length of the street. As such, the 17 -foot setback would be measured from the edge of the nearest "required or planned" sidewalk. For further analysis please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report. CONCUR: Sol Blumenfe d, Director Community D velopment Department Stephen R. ell City Manag Attachments 1. Graphic examples 2. Proposed Ordinance 3. P.C. Resolution/Minutes 7/5/94 4. P.C. Background staffreports/minutes 5. City Council background memo, 2/15/94 6. C.C. resolution of intent/minutes 2/22/94 K/pcsr17 2 2 en Robertson Associate Planner 54' C street & lsidewalk R.O.W Setback measured from property line ' 17' o 54' 1 Street & < sidewalk E------- 80' R.O.W. Setback measured from sidewalk edge Setback measured from Property line ---- - -- - -- - -- - -- - I Setback measured from sidewalk edge 17' Garage Setback from property line or sidewalk examples for typical street and right-of-way widths 3 1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ORDINANCE 94 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND SECTION 1157(C) IN REGARDS TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING GARAGES AND PARKING STALLS TO MEASURE SAID SETBACK FROM THE EDGE OF THE NEAREST PUBLIC SIDEWALK OR STREET IMPROVEMENT RATHER THAN THE PROPERTY LINE AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on October 11, 1994 to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The purpose of the 17 -foot parking setback requirement is that adequate length is provided for guest parking behind a garage without encroaching over the public sidewalk; B. These benefits would still be provided by measuring the setback from the edge of the sidewalk or nearest street improvement; C. Measuring from the edge of sidewalk or nearest street improvement would give property owners more flexibility in developing their property, and is a logical use of the extra right- of-way width available on some streets within the city; D. An initial study has been prepared by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and it was determined that the proposed amendment would result in a less than significant impact on the environment; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordaind that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 1157(C), paragraph 1, to read as follows (underlined text to be added overstrike text to be deleted): _ "In residential zones, garages or parking stalls fronting on a public street shall be set back a minimum of seventeen (17) feet from the pfepeine exterior edge of the nearest public improvement (sidewalk or street improvement) if roll -up garage doors are installed, or set back twenty (20) feet if standard garage doors are installed. On streets where 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 public improvements for sidewalks have not been completed, the above setback shall be measured from the edge of the required or planned sidewalk" SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and in be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. K/PCRS17.DOC PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: AB STAIN: AB SENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 5 B CK "ROUND M TERI <<' C L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION 94-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING SECTION 1157(C) IN REGARDS TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING GARAGES AND PARKING STALLS TO MEASURE SAID SETBACK FROM THE EDGE OF THE NEAREST PUBLIC SIDEWALK OR STREET IMPROVEMENT RATHER THAN THE PROPERTY LINE AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 5, 1994 to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The purpose of the 17 -foot parking setback requirement is that adequate length is provided for guest parking behind a garage without encroaching over the public sidewalk; B. These benefits would still be provided by measuring the setback from the edge of the sidewalk or nearest street improvement; C. Measuring from the edge of sidewalk or nearest street improvement would give property owners more flexibility in developing their property, and is a logical use of the extra right- of-way width available on some streets within the city; D. An initial study has been prepared by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and it was determined that the proposed amendment would result in a less than significant impact on the environment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach recommends that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 1157(C), paragraph 1, to read as follows (underlined text to be added overstrike text to be deleted): "In residential zones, garages or parking stalls fronting on a public street shall be set back a minimum of seventeen (17) feet from the exterior edge of the nearest public improvement (sidewalk or street improvement) if roll -up garage doors are installed, or set back twenty (20) feet if standard garage doors are installed" 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 VOTE: AYES: Comms.Dettelbach,Di Monda,Marks,Chmn.Merl NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm.Suard CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 94-20 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at t ' eir re 1. meeting of July 5, 1994. Rodd. -ASI airman Joseph Di Monde/ Vice Chairman Date K/PCRS 17.DOC 1 Michael Schubach, Secretary MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Marks, to APPROVE, CUP 94-4/PDP 9 -1, Conditional_Use Permit and Precise Development Plan to allow a 1500 square foot drive-th gh fast food restaurant, and doption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 1107 Pie' is Coast Hwy, McDonald's, changing -flit -Resolution to permitting neon lighting, as reque edly the applicant. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Comms. Dettelbach, Di1V�bn • a, Marks, Ch . n Merl None Comm. Suard None Chmn. Merl stated this.action was subject to appeal to the City Council within 10 days ough the City Clerk's office.,, 9. SS 94-3 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARDS TO THE 17 -FOOT GARAGE SET BACK, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION (continued from June 21, 1994 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said text amendment and adoption of the Environmental Negative Declaration. Mr. Schubach stated the draft Resolution essentially allowed, on those streets with large public right-of- ways which probably will not be used in the future or, if used, the consequences would be negligible, the 17 -feet set back to start at the nearest improvement instead of the property line. He noted a change in the draft Resolution, which should include a clarifying statement noting measurement is taken at the exterior of the right-of-way (exterior sidewalk edge); measurement would be taken from the sidewalk edge nearest to the property line. Comm. Di Monda questioned instances where no sidewalks existed. Mr. Schubach noted this was a possibility, stating that some properties would have a short area between the garage and sidewalk, but this would be an acceptable situation. He discussed specific situations of missing sidewalks with Comm. Di Monda, who felt the City would be better served to include a clause stating that where no sidewalk existed, measurement would take place a specific number of feet from the curb (whatever the normal City sidewalk width is determined to be). Comm. Dettelbach felt only a small number of properties would be affected and need not be addressed at this time. Chmn. Merl opened the Public Hearing at 8:00 p.m. No one wished to speak, and Chmn. Merl closed the Public Hearing at 8:00 p.m. Comm. Marks discussed extra -wide right-of-ways that have not and probably would not be used by the City. Page g PC Minutes 7-5-94 MOTION by Comm. Dettelbach, Seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to APPROVE, SS 94-3, Special study and text amendment to the zoning ordinance in regards to the 17 -foot garage set back, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration, including the change to Item B to read, "...from the exterior edge of the sidewalk..." AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Marks, Chmn. Merl NOES: None ABSENT: Comm. Suard ABSTAIN: None 10. SS 94-4 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDIN COMM RCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AND ADOPTION OF N ENVIRO MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION (continued from June 2 , 1994 meeting). : To recommend approval of said text amendment and . doption of the Environmental Negat e Declaration. Mr. Schubach stated Staff propos because when the ordinance was pass Also an exemption was being proposed buildings not having the new set back requi in regards to the set back. Alcoholic sales wou discussed possible impacts to buildings with Co a lesser set back in the Cl and C2 zo s would be acceptable , buildings were allowed to be 35 f. t rather than 30 feet tall. r non -conforming buildings r-garding this set back; those ent would not be consi . - red non -conforming buildings be passed over to other study being conducted. He . Di Monda Chmn. Merl opened the Public Hearing at 8:07 p.m. Chuck Sheldon, 1800 The Strand, property owner .f 101 ermosa Avenue, stated he planned to remodel and expand this property, which has a five oot setback : t the rear with a 35 -feet tall apartment building adjacent to the rear of the property. text amendmen ould allow the proposed remodel. He supported this text amendment. No one else wished to speak, and Chm Merl closed the Public Hearing . 8:09 p.m. Comm. Di Monda referenced the t raft Resolution, paragraphs E, noting relette ' g of the paragraphs was necessary. The second pa graph E, line 27 should be changed to read, "... least...". Comm. Dettelbach commented parraph F, line 3 should read, "...prepared by..." MOTION by Comm f ettelbach, Seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to APPROVE, SS 9 4, Special study and text a7hdment regarding commercial development standards, and adoptio of an Environmental Negative Declaration, to include changes in relettering in text as discussed. AYES: '` Comms. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Marks, Chmn. Merl NOES: / None ABSENT: Comm. Suard ABSTAIN: None Page C1 PC Minutes 7-5-94 C June 15, 1994 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission June 21 1994 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 94-3 AND TEXT AMENDMENT PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO THE 17 -FOOT GARAGE/PARKING STALL SETBACK REQUIREMENT INITIATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Recommendation To continue to the meeting of July 5, 1994, to allow consideration by the full Planning Commission. ALTERNATIVE: Adopt the attached resolution recommending that the City Council amend Section 1157(c) Background At the meeting of April 19, 1994, the Planning Commission considered several options, and'directed staff to proceed with the option to modify the 17 -foot setback to measure from the edge of the nearest public improvement rather than the property line. At their meeting of February 15, 1994, the City Council initiated the subject study to give property owners more flexibility towards achieving the maximum and best use of their property. For further background please refer to the previous staff report and the 2/15/94 memo to the City Council. Analysis As previously discussed, the proposed modification to measure the 17 -foot setback from the edge of the sidewalk, or the nearest public improvement where there is no sidewalk, would improve flexibility on many lots in the City where extra right-of-way width extends well beyond the sidewalk. Prospect Avenue and Monterey Boulevard are the most prominent examples, since the right-of-way width for both these corridors is eighty (80) feet, and the actual width of the public street and sidewalk 1O 7 c improvements is only about 54 feet. This results in an extra 13 -feet of right-of-way width between the edge of the sidewalk and front property lines. The typical situation throughout the city's residential areas are: 60 -foot right-of-way widths with improvement street/sidewalk widths of 54 feet (an extra 3 -feet between the edge of sidewalk and front property lines) ; and; 40 -foot right-of-way widths with street/sidewalk widths of 38 feet (an extra 1 foot between the edge of sidewalk and front property lines.). Staff is providing this information for your review and consideration. It is recommended, however, that final consideration of this matter be withheld until the next meeting when all Planning Commissioners will be present CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. P.C. Minutes 4/19/94 K/pcsrl 7 Associate Planner HEARINGS 9. SS 94-3 -- SPECIAL STUDY TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARDS TO THE 17' GARAGE SETBACK. Staff Recommended Action: To direct staff as deemed appropriate. Mr. Schubach stated the Council asked reconsideration of the 17' garage setback to allow more property -owner flexibility. He suggested methods to be considered. Audience participation was invited at 9:25 p.m. No one wished to speak relating to the item. The Commission discussed with Mr. Schubach the various possible applications and lack of interest in widening streets at this time. MOTION by Vice-Chmn.. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Suard, to RECOMMEND Staffs recommendation #2, to modify the 17 -foot setback requirement to measure from the edge of the nearest public improvement, to allow property owners with a right-of-way to include the right-of-way up to the sidewalk line in the setback. AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, Marks, Suard, Vice-Chmn. Di Monda NOES: None ABSENT: Chmn. Merl - _ ABSTAIN: None 10.a Memorandum rega • ' . Planning Commission liai meeting. Receive and File. 10.b . ive future Planning Commission agenda. Receive and File o April 26, 1994 City Council Page 12 PC Minutes 4-19-94 c April 14, 1994 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission April 19 1994 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 94-3 PURPOSE: 17 -FOOT GARAGE/PARKING STALL SETBACK INITIATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Direct staff to proceed with one of the following options: 1. Eliminate the 17 -foot setback requirement; 2. Modify the 17 -foot setback requirement to measure from the edge of the nearest public improvement (street, curb, or sidewalk) rather than the property line; 3. Maintain the 17 -foot setback requirement for new buildings only, provide an exception for existing structures; 4. A combination of 2. and 3. 5. Do nothing (maintain the current requirement) Background At their meeting of February 15, 1994, the City Council initiated the subject study to give property owners more flexibility towards achieving the maximum and best use of their property. The Council first discussed revisiting this issue in response to the Planning Commission's request to explain their decision in regards to the case at 850 8th Place. In that case the Commission conditioned the approval of an expansion project upon bringing the garage setback up to code. The Council overturned that decision. For background on the origination of the 17' setback requirement and recent amendments, please refer to the attached 2/15/94 memo to the City Council. Analysis The following is a brief discussion of the recommended options: ELIMINATION OF THE 17 -FOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENT 13 9 A ( C Eliminating this requirement would increase design flexibility. Instead of absolutely requiring a specific portion of the lot be used for the garage setback, other options would be available. Of course, an area would have to be set-aside for parking three vehicles for single-family dwellings, and 2 1/2 vehicles per unit for multiple family units in the R-2 and R-3 zones. The potential drawback would be that if vehicles are parked behind garages they would potentially block sidewalks, thus inhibiting clear passage for pedestrians. MEASURE SETBACK FROM EDGE OF SIDEWALK Under this option, the 17 -foot setback would be measured from the edge of the sidewalk, or the nearest public improvement where there is no sidewalk. This would improve flexibility on several lots in the City where extra right-of-way width extends beyond the sidewalk (e.g. along Prospect Avenue and Monterey Boulevard) This option would address the concern of blocking pedestrian passage on sidewalks, but would not increase the flexibility on lots which do not front on streets with extra right-of-way width. In cases where the extra right-of-way exists, if that right-of-way was publicly improved, vehicles parked behind garages would then overhang the sidewalk. APPLY REQUIREMENT ONLY TO NEW PROJECTS This option would eliminate the nonconforming status of many structures throughout the city and allow their remodeling and expansion without requiring them to change their garage setback.. Unless some limit or threshold is placed on the amount of remodeling or expansion that could occur, it would be unlimited as long as the structure with the substandard garage setback is maintained. Under the current nonconforming status for garages with less than 17 -foot setbacks, its clear in Article 13 how much expansion and remodeling is allowed while maintaining the garage. MAINTAIN THE CURRENT REQUIREMENT The Commission may wish to send this study back to the Council with a recommendation that no changes be made. The reasoning could be based on the recognition that quality projects have been constructed in compliance with the requirement; extra guest parking has been provided; and clear passage for pedestrians is assured along sidewalks. ; CONCUR: ichael Schubach Planning Director Attachments t4- L,P `. Ken Robertson Associate Planner K/pcsrl7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner SUBJECT: 17 -foot Garage/Parking Stall Setback DATE: February 15, 1994 Recommendation If desirable, adopt the attached resolution of intent to initiate a study and possible text amendment At the meeting of February 8, 1994, upon reviewing a request from the Planning Commission for direction in regards to the 17 -foot garage setback requirement, the City Council agendized this matter for further discussion. The following is a brief chronology and summary of the establishment and subsequent amendment to the garage setback requirement: 5/13/86 The City Council adopted ordinance 86-839 to amend the parking requirements in the zoning code to add requirements for guest parking spaces and, also, to require all parking stalls or garages to be setback a minimum of 17 feet from streets or alleys (17' for roll -up garage doors, 20' for standard garages). The setback area was allowed to count for required guest parking. The reason for these amendments was because of concerns that inadequate parking was being provided for new large residential projects, and also because inadequate setbacks resulted in cars that parked behind garages blocking the sidewalks. 4/24/90 The City Council adopted ordinance 90-1029 to amend the 17 -foot setback requirement by deleting the requirement on alley frontages. Instead setbacks of 3, 9, or 17 feet were allowed (garages fronting on alleys of 15 feet in width or less need only comply with the turning radius requirements). This amendment arose from a concern that the ,17 -foot setback on alleys unnecessarily limited design options for creating usable first floor space on residential projects, especially on smaller lots. With these changes other options were made available for providing required guest parking. The 17 -foot setback was ili maintained on street frontages because of its value in discouraging cars from blocking sidewalks. Given that this issue has been recently been studied; was the subject of several public hearings; and that concerns about the alley situations have been resolved; the Council should consider if further study is warranted at this time. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director NOTED: Stephen Burrell City Manager Attachments 'r 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 c RESOLUTION 94- 5663 A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO INITIATE A STUDY AND POSSIBLE TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARDS TO THE 17 - FOOT GARAGE SETBACK WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on February 22, 1994, and made th following findings: A. Imposition of the 17 -foot garage setback is not allowing property owners the maximum and best use of their property; B. Elimination or modification of this requirement should be examined. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby direct the Planning Commission and staff to initiate a study of this issue. PASSED, APPROV 1D ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 1994. of the Co cil and MAYOR City of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: QTY CLERK APPROVED�AS TO FO (rj CITY ATTORNEY Page I tion: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve changing the Street Lighting Assessment Dis ict title to Landscaping and Street Lighting Ass -_s - me District; and, 2) adop Resolution No. 94-5662, entitled, **A R SOLUTION OF THE FORNIA, PARE A REPO PART 2, 'LAND DIVISION 15, ST CALIFORNIA, FOR T SCAPING AND STREET L APPURTENANT WORK AND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA B DERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTIC CAPING AND LIGHTING A ETS-AND HIGHWAY INSTALLATI HTING F HE COMMENCING JULY 1, 19 Motion Reviczky, secon• B unanimous vote. AN CH, CALI- RKS TO PRE - 4, CHAPTER 1, OF 19721, BEING DE OF THE STATE OF OF OR PLANTING LAND - TURES, APPURTENANCES AND INTENANCE THEREOF IN THE IFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1995.11 he motion carried by a enz. (g) REOUEST FOR 30-DEXTENSION OF TEMPORAR PUBLIC WORKS LD PERSONNEL AND ONE POLIC randum fro ersonnel Director Robert Blackwo ary 9, 1•'4. APPOINTMENT OF TWO SERGEANT. Memo - d dated Febru- Act* n: To approve the staff recommendation t� ext .d by 30 s the temporary appointment of a Sweeper Opera •r, a aintenance I position, and a Police Sergeant. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO STUDY 171 GARAGE SETBACK. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 15, This item was removed from the consent calendar by Council - member Bowler for separate discussion later in the meeting. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, said the 17 -foot setback applied only to the driveway and the upper floor of a house could be cantilevered over that; and that it should be clarified that the rule only applies to over 50 percent re- models; and, Dean Nota - 2467 Myrtle Avenue, said he has always ob- jected to the 17 -foot setback requirement be- cause it takes away flexibility, that there are other less burdensome methods to achieve the same thing; supported studying the issue, at least a study on including right-of-ways. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 94-5663, entitled, " A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HER - City Council Minutes 02-22-94 Page 8438 _Ig_ • C C • MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO INITIATE A STUDY AND POSSIBLE TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARDS TO THE 17 - FOOT GARAGE SETBACK."" Motion Bowler, second Benz. The motion carried by a unani- mous vote. RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLIC TION TO ALLOW A NEWLY CONSTRUCTED 61 HIGH REPLACEMENT FE CE •N THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 624 GOULD AVE UE. morandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani date• Feb- ru- 15, 1994. This 'tem was removed from the consent calendar by Council - member Towler for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: o approve the staff recommendation t•- approve the encroachme permit application to allow a new y constructed 6 foot high eplacement fence on the public . ght-of-way ad- jacent to 624 ould Avenue. Motion Bowler, second Benz. The mot •n carried by a unanimous vote. (j) Recommendation for ward of bid for p►eliminary engineering and final design •r Earthctuake • inforcement of Clark Building - CIP 90-616. Memorandum rom Public Works Direc- tor Amy Amirani dated =bruary 14, 994. This item was removed fro the member Benz for separate di cu Public Works Director Amiran responded to Council quest ons responded to Council ques ons. onsent calendar by Council - ion later in the meeting. resented the staff report and City Manager Burrell also Coming forward to address th Council on this item was: Shirley Cassell 611 Monterey Blvd., said the Clark building w old and tired .nd the City would be throwing oney away to try t• engineer a seismic retrofit, said the City should ear the old build- ing do and build a new one. Action: To ap.'rove the staff recommendation o: 1) award th- contract in the amount of $5,201 to Barelli & Associ es, Inc. of Los Angeles, California to perform preliinary engineering for seismic retro t of the Clar building; 2) au orize the Mayor to execute and the City • erk to a est to the engineering services agreement sub -ct to proval by the City Attorney; and, 3) authorize the Director of Public Works to make ne sary adjustments within the approved budget. M. ion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unani- mous vote. City Council Minutes 02-22-94 Page 8439 -11- ITEM #4: PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE 17' GARAGE SETBACK, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. THIS PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED FROM THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 11, 1994. TO REVIEW THE STAFF REPORT, PLEASE REFER TO ITEM #4 IN THE AGENDA PACKET OF OCTOBER 11, 1994. September 29, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 11, 1994 (CONTINUED FROM MAY 10, 1994, FOR REFERRAL BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-7 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER A TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING HEIGHT" AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF "GRADE". INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Introduce the attached ordinance to amend the building height definition. Background: The Planning Commission has investigated this matter further on referral from the City Council since the Council did not take action on the definitions previously proposed by the Planning Commission. (Please refer to the previous staff reports and minutes for further background.) Analysis: Staff has prepared a new building height definition based upon Planning Commission direction. The definition reflects the Commission's recommendation to base height measurement from the property corners and property lines rather than from public improvements off the property. Further, the definition allows for variations from the basic method of using straight lines from the corner points for determining grade. While the straight line method is appropriate for most lots which are flat or uniformly sloping, it can be unduly restrictive on lots with uneven slopes or convex contours. Therefore, the definition includes language, and a second diagram, to allow the base grade to follow the contour of the lot along side property lines on unevenly sloping lots. At the May 10 meeting the Council expressed concerns about the responsibility for verifying the final building height and the application of the height method on unusually steep lots. Staff brought these concerns to the attention of the Commission, as discussed on page two of the June 7, 1994 Planning Commission staff report. The Building Division's current and 5 long-standing practice to require a final survey to verify final height, which is the homeowner's or developer's responsibility, is included with respect to unusually steep concave or convex lots. For further background, analysis, and a review of previously discussed and recommended alternatives please refer to the attachments. Attached is the new definition and associated diagram as recommended by the Commission CONCUR: Sol Blumenf4d Community evelopment Director Stephen R. Burrell City_Manager Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance and diagram 2. P.C. Staff reports 8/2/94 and 6/7/94 3. P.C. Minutes 4. C.C. Minutes 5/10/94 KR/ccsrhite 2.. In Robertson Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ORDINANCE 94 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 208, IN REGARDS TO DEFINITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING BUILDING HEIGHT AND GRADE AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on October 11, 1994 to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Definitions of building height and the grade used to determine the building height need clarification so the method applied to determine building height is better understood and consistently applied; B. An initial study has been prepared by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and it was determined that the proposed amendment would result in a less than significant impact on the environment; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordained that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 208, Definitions, to read as follows: "Sec. 208 Building Height "Building Height" means a vertical distance measured from grade, as determined as described herein, to the corresponding uppermost point of the roof, as shown in the examples below. "Grade" is determined based on existing corner point elevations, taking into consideration significant variations in the slope along property lines. For unusual lots with extreme convex contours, the "grade" of a lot shall be based on a detailed topographical survey with spot elevations called out at minimum two (2) foot intervals. In these cases, the final determination of grade shall be made by the Planning Commission." (Graphic Examples attached on separate page) SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and in be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. KRh:/ccrshite PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: AB STAIN: AB SENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FLAT OR UNIFORMLY SLOPING LOT L_ 2 UNEVEN OR VARIABLY SLOPING LOT NOTES: 1. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT HIGHEST POINT ON BUILDING RIDGE OR ROOF 2. NATURAL GRADE BASED UPON EXISTING CORNER POINT ELEVATIONS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTME PLANNING DIVISION BACKGROUND M TERI L July 28, 1994 Honorable Chairman and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission August 2, 1994 (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 7, 1994, AFTER REFERRAL BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-7 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER A TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING HEIGHT" AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF "GRADE". INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation: Recommend an amended building height definition as set forth in the attached Planning Commission Alternative 3. Background: At the meeting of June 7, 1994, the Commission directed staff to prepare a definition and method of building height to incorporate their expressed concerns about uneven sloping lots. The Commission is investigating this matter again on referral from the City Council, since the Council did not take action on the definitions as previously proposed by the Planning Commission. (Please refer to the previous staff reports and minutes for further background.) Analysis: Attached is a new definition and diagrams to incorporate the comments of the Commissioners made at the meeting of June 7. In response to one of the questions raised by the Council, the definition reflects the Commission's desire to base height measurements from the property lines rather than public improvements located off the property. The previous definition; of grade has been modified to allow deviations from the basic method of using straight lines from the corner points for determining grade. While the Commission expressed support of that method for flat or uniformly sloping lots, it also expressed that it is unfair on lots with uneven slopes, especially those with a convex contour. Thus the definition has been modified and, further, a second diagram has been included to show that on uneven or variable sloping lots the base grade would follow the contour of the lot along side property lines. 6 Staff has attempted to keep the language as concise and simple as possible, relying on the graphic diagrams for further explanation. Michael Schubach Planning Director Sol Blumenfeld Community evelopment Director Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Alternative 3 2. Previously presented alternatives 3. P.C. minutes 6/7/94 KR/ccsrhite cl Ken Robertson Associate Planner C C PLANNING COMMISSION ALTERNATIVE 3 Sec. 208 Building Height "Building Height" means a vertical distance measured from grade, as determined as described herein, to the corresponding uppermost point of the roof, as shown in the examples below. "Grade" is determined based on existing corner point elevations, taking into consideration significant variations in the slope along property lines (see examples on next page) s PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FLAT OR UNIFORMLY SLOPING LOT L_ - - - - - - 2 UNEVEN OR VARIABLY SLOPING LOT NOTES: 1. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT HIGHEST POINT ON BUILDING RIDGE OR ROOF 2. NATURAL GRADE BASED UPON EXISTING CORNER POINT ELEVATIONS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEt PLANNING DIVISION ALTERNATIVE 1 (PREVIOUS) PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (3/1/94) "Sec. 208 Building Height "Building Height" means a vertical distance of the building as measured from grade at property line corner points, to the highest point of the building" incorporated herein, as shown in the following example. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ENVELOPE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PER �"----_ BUILDING HEIGHT EXAMPLE Alley — Highest Point of Building 0 Grade Plane Based on lour corner points 110 Actual Elevation Points from Topographical Survey Sec. 208.1 Grade Interpolated Point on Grade Plane Sidewalk Street "Grade", means the existing surface of the ground, either paved or unpaved." C ALTERNATIVE 2 (Original recommendation of staff) Sec. 208 Building Height "Building Height" means a vertical distance measured from the "grade" of a lot, determined as described herein, from any portion of the building site covered by the building to the corresponding uppermost point of the roof. The "grade" of a lot, for the purpose of measuring building height, is a flat or sloping plane based on the grade elevations at the corner points of a lot. Corner point elevations are determined from their actual elevation when abutting public improvements, or by interpolating on a straight line between the nearest public improvement on the front of lot to the nearest on the rear of the lot (for example from sidewalk to alley) ; or in the case where a lot abuts another property the corner point elevations are determined by interpolating on a straight line between the edge of the street, sidewalk, or alley, whichever is closer to the subject property, to the corner point elevations where the lot abuts another lot. When using corner points not based on public improvements additional survey information, such as surrounding spot elevations, must be provided to verify that the grade at these points has not been altered. The intent of this definition is -for building height to be measured from the grade of a lot, as it can best be determined, as the grade existed naturally or after the most permanent alteration to the land was completed at the time the first public improvements were installed (streets, alleys, and sidewalks); and, for the maximum building height line to follow a straight line between such public improvements. Further, the purpose of this definition is to ensure that building height measurements are consistently applied without being biased by more recent alterations to grade. For unusual lots with extreme convex contours, the "grade" of a lot shall be based on a detailed topographical survey with spot elevations called out at minimum 2 foot intervals, rather than the flat plane method described above. In these cases, the determination of grade shall be made by the Planning Commission. Alley 1 12 f Cannot Exceed max. Bldg. Height 30' Interpolated Point on 1 10 s Existing Grade Plane ALTERNATIVE 2 - DIAGRAMS Diagrams for Pitched Roof Critical Point of Building Max. Height (103.5 + 25 = 128.5) D 100' Existing Grade Plane Based on four corner points these two points interpolated from the edge of sidewalk 110 Actual Elevation Points from Survey (101) Interpolated Elevation Points 30' (110.2) 110 AIIey 112 (100 99.5 Sidewalk Diagram for a Flat Roof 01.5 Street Critical Point of Building Max. Height (102.7+ 25 = 127.5) Cannot Exceed max. Bldg. Height / . . Interpolated Point on Existing Gracie Plane 100' D Existing Grade Plane Based on four corner points " these two points interpolated from the edge of sidewalk 110 Actual Elevation Points from Survey (101) Interpolated Elevation Points 25' Sidewalk 99.5 01.5 Street Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission (REFERRED BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-7 May 31, 1994 Regular Meeting of June 7, 1994 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER A TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING HEIGHT" AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF "GRADE". INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation: Choose a preferred method for determining grade, and make a recommendation to the City Council. Background: At their meetings of April 12, April 26, and May 10, 1994, the City Council considered and discussed this issue. No action was taken to adopt the ordinance as proposed by the Planning Commission, or the staff alternative, as previously recommended to the Planning Commission. Instead, the Council directed the Planning Commission to investigate the issue further, noting their concerns, and to consider the inclusion of a policy that building height be measured by a survey at the time of framing. Also, the Council directed the Commission to study the possibility of using a different method for steep sloping lots (i.e. 1:3 or greater). Analysis: The issue of how height is measured is not in dispute. As such, the only aspect of this study to be further examined is where the height is measured from. The Planning Commission recommended a new definition which simply stated that property line corner points be used (Alternative 1). The alternative recommendation of staff was to use the back of the nearest public right of way where possible, and to interpolate from those points (Alternative 2). Also, staff's alternative included language to allow the use of more than the corner points for dealing with lots with convex contours. The Council's concerns include the potential for artificially raising grade to increase building height, unusually steep lots, and the responsibility for verifying the final building height. The Council could not reach a consensus to support either option and is thus requesting further study of the matter. In short, they would like the Commission to further evaluate the — 13— C c pluses and minuses of the two basic alternatives, and choose the preferred method for determining the grade, or, to further modify the Planning Commission recommendation. Using the Property Line Corner Points Using Nearest Public Improvement (P.C. alternative 1) (staff alternative 2) PLUSES: • Uses existing grade on the actual building • Uses a fixed, easily found elevation point, site that cannot be changed • Less interpolation required • Minimizes possibilities for abuses to artificially raise grade MINUSES: • More likely to be abused (i.e. artificially • Requires interpolating from points as far raised grades) as 20 feet away where extra -wide right- of-ways exist In choosing either method above, staff would strongly recommend that provisions be included that give a landowner the opportunity to work with staff when convex or unusual contours exist on the lot. In these situations it can be unfair to require the use of an "imaginary" straight line, or flat plane, in situations such as the following: I 1..1 i ,. iI rv. I In regards to the concern about excessively sloping lots that exceed 1:3, the Council did not provide any specific direction as to what should be done differently. The potential problem with these lots is that if the maximum height line follows the slope multiple stepping of the structure becomes necessary. An option would thus be the use of an averaging approach for the whole lot, or perhaps for portions of the lot. For example, the method used by Santa Monica divides a lot into thirds. Another option would be to allow Planning Commission approval to vary from the straight line approach on steep lots that exceed a certain slope. In regards to the responsibility for final measurement, Councilmember Oakes expressed concern with the Building Department's practice of dropping a measuring tape from the highest point of the building. While the Building Department does this in some cases, its purpose is to check final building height as compared to finished grade when it has been lowered (remember, the existing definition clearly states that height is also measured from finished grade, when lowered). However, this measurement is in addition to the primary height measurement done by the builder's surveyor which verifies height in terms of its relationship with "existing grade." As such, staff believes this concern is already addressed. Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments: 1. C.C. staff reports/minutes 5/10/94, 4/26/94, 4/12/94 KR/ccsrhite ►5 Ken Robertson Associate Planner HEARINGS 8. SS 93-7 -- A REFERRAL BACK FROM THE MAY 10, 1994 CITY COUNCIL OF A SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION AND METHOD OF DETERMINATION FOR GRADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT (continued from June 7 and July 5, 1994 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: To recommend a modified definition. Planning Director Schubach stated this item was being brought back with the changes recommended by the Commission. He stated the effort was to allow the property owner to use the natural grade, as best as possible. He recommended adoption of the proposed ordinance. Chmn. Merl invited public comment relating to this item at 7:40 p.m. No one wished to speak on this subject. Comm. Marks described a lot with a 10 -foot mound in the middle, noting if a house were built on the mound, it would be higher than its adjacent neighbors. Mr. Schubach noted the uniqueness of this example and commented the property owner is supposed to be able to build at the grade that was purchased. Comm. Marks suggested an amendment be made to the building code which addresses natural phenomena. He felt uniformity was necessary to prevent owners from illegally increasing the ground level height. Mr. Schubach referenced the diagrams on Page 4, discussing interpretations with Comm. Marks. Comm. Di Monda stated the function of the Commission was not to try to reduce everything to the least common denominator. He stated the sky exposure plane would follow the unusual grade variations. Comms. Marks and Di Monda discussed their opposing viewpoints relating to this issue. Comm. Di Monda noted the simplicity of following the ground contour, leading the property owners to reasonably expect to be able to build height distances according to ground contour and allowing for ground contour variations and design flexibility. Comm. Di Monda noted the graphics provided were incorrect and asked they be corrected. Comm. Tucker commented that measurements were being taken from lot corner points, creating a difficulty in manipulation of grade and stated he did not oppose Staffs recommendation. Comm. Di Monda stated the measurements were based upon a continuous plane, starting at the lot corners. Chmn. Merl also supported Staff's recommendation, noting it was a good proposal. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Tucker, to APPROVE Staffs Recommendation, Alternative No. 3, with Grade being defined as "the existing surface of the ground, taking into consideration significant variations in the slope along the property lines", Building Height being defined as "the vertical distance measured from grade, as determined in the graphics" which are to be codified, adding a CONDITION that the graphics be corrected and brought back to the Commission for final approval. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Tucker, Chmn. Merl NOES: None ABSENT: Comm. Dettelbach ABSTAIN: None Page 1 t PC Minutes 8-2-94 Comm. Di Monda commented for the record that the Building Dept. feels it is entitled, in some instances, a "grade" definition that does not agree with the Planning Dept. definition. He requested that since the Building Dept. felt the UBC preempted the City's zoning ordinance, explanation of the relationship between the State building code and the City zoning ordinance with respect to definitions should be made to Building Dept. Staff. Director Blumenfeld responded, noting efforts were in progress to better integrate Planning and Building Department procedures. THIRD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS. : To direct Staff as deemed appropriate. Planning Dir- tor Schubach stated he received a call from the Public Works Director r questing the circulation eleme • t amendment allowing relocation of the bike path along the norther portion of The Strand be added. - . iscussed the general parking plan requirements with the Co • ission, stating the downtown parking pla will be presented to the Coastal Commission on Augu 18, 1994. Chmn. Merl invited public co ment relating to this item at 7:57 p.m. No . e wished to speak on this subject. _ Comm. Di Monda commented the or _'nal discussion had inclu• d the north end of the bike path, requiring changing of the staircase to a ra . After a Public Hering, the Council had decided to take no action. Comm. Di Monda felt, at this p•'nt, it should . - the Council's decision to reverse that decision and suggested the Public Works Direct. 's reque be given to the Council for consideration. The consensus of the Commission was that it wou • - willing to look at this issue if the Council requested the Commission initiate this item, since e last a on was by the Council to not proceed with the bike path along the north end of The Stra STAFF ITEMS• 10.a. Election of the new Chai an and Vice Chairman The consensus of the ' ommission was to CONTINUE the election t the next scheduled meeting of Septem 10.b. Community r 6, 1994 to allow all Commissioners to be in attendan evelopment Department activity report of June, 1994. Director :lumenfeld said the Community Development activity reports, encompa ing Planng, are included for review. Chmn. Merl stated this would be helpful to the Commissio eceive and File Page ( i PC Minutes 8-2-94 11. SS 94-5 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUIREMENT, AND STANDARDS FOR OFF -SALE ALCOH L BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENTS, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONME AL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said text amendment and a Environmental Negative Declaration. option of the Mr. Schubach state taff recommended the CUP be used for only establishmen : open after 10:30 p.m: with off-site sales of aibohol and the 100 -foot setback distance be maintaine . "or those establishments open after 10:30 p.m. H- explained Manhattan Beach's policies relating . this issue. Mr. Schubach detailed the suggested alter . tives and enforcement problems. Chmn. Merl opened the Public : aring at 8:15 p.m. No one wish • to speak, and Chmn. Merl closed the Public Hearing at 8:15 p.m. Comm. Marks suggested a study of effec upon liquor st • es be conducted. Chmn. Merl asked for a Staff analysis as to the impacts of this prop sal upon • ture liquor stores. Mr. Schubach stated the areas within the City were very limited for fu . re b mess development for off-site sale of alcoholic beverages and discussed previous problems expe nced with the method of measurement of the 100 - foot setback. Mr. Schubach noted "enforce , nt' as of concern. Comm. Dettelbach felt small neighborhood markets, selling a small sale ratio of cohol, should not be penalized. Under this recommendation, they would have to corn . ete the same reirements as liquor stores would, suggesting a sales ratio or shelf -space ration thres .Id be considered, to , hich Comm. Di Monda agreed. Chmn. Merl summarized, stating the Comm* sion's concerns regarded . e -evening sales ofalcohol and'volume excess of a certain percentage of : es. MOTION by Comm. Dette Bach, Seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to ♦ONTINUE, SS 94-5, Special study and text amendme t to the conditional use permit requirements, nd standards for off -sale alcohol beverage estab 'shments, and adoption of an Environmental Negati, Declaration and to DIRECT Staff to re ommend a range of viable enforcement policies, where off- ° to alcoholic beverage sales are truly a s ondary function and establish a criteria of enforcement, and su . it a Staff Report of results, repo, cing this item prior to the Public Hearing. AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Marks, Chmn. Merl NOES- None ABENT: Comm. Suard ABSTAIN: None HEARINGS 12. SS 93-7 -- A REFERRAL BACK FROM THE MAY 10, 1994 CITY COUNCIL OF A SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION AND METHOD OF DETERMINATION FOR GRADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT (continued from June 7, 1994 meeting). Page 13 . PC Minutes 7-5-94 Staff Recommended Action: To review and comment. Mr. Schubach stated Staff recommended this matter be CONTINUED since a five -member Commission was not in attendance. The new Commissioner will be able to attend the next scheduled meeting. Comm. Marks invited public testimony at 8:27 p.m.. No one wished to speak on this subject. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Dettelbach, to CONTINUE this item until a full Commission is in attendance, with appropriate noticing completed prior to that meeting. No objection, so ordered. 13.a. Mem {andum regarding Planning Commission meeting in August. The Com=' on agreed to request that only one meeting be held in August, • 94, scheduled August 2, 1994. If an applicant requests a second meeting due to urgen .usiness, then one would be held. 13.b. Planning Department a tivity report of May 1994. RECEIVE AND FILE 13.c. Tentative future Planning Commis on agend RECEIVE AND FILE 13.d. City Council minutes of May 31, . s e 2, 6, an . 4, 1994. RECEIVE AND FILE COMMISSIONER ITEMS Comm. Di Monda stat- the Pier Subcommittee was meeting July 6, 1994 and vited Comm. Marks to attend that meetin:. Comm. Marks preferred the packet be given to him for info ' ational purposes. Mr. Schubach stated he would remind Ms. Rooney of this request. Comm. li,Monda discussed with Mr. Schubach parking of "big rigs". Comm. Di Monda fe the City should not allow "big rigs" to park in City parking lots, noting they were "sneaking" in the Cit all parking lot. The Commission REQUESTED a Staff Report from Staff be presented at the July 19, 1994 meeting. Page j 9 PC Minutes 7-5-94 reed with the proposed Conditions. No o - else wished to speak relating to this item, and Chmn. Merl closed the Public Hearing at 7:3 p.m. Comm. Mark felt drawing clarification was necessary before any decision was made. Co . Suard agreed the propty line issue needed to be resolved. He asked clarification as thamount of remuneration the received for use of City property. Mr. Schubach stated the Ci received a $1. per square foot fee, bu agreed to report the actual amount to the Commission. C . m. Suard stated he supported an outside - ating area, even with reduced landscaping, noting • is business would be operated as a quality busine which would change the exterior to enhance t - area if this concept was discovered not to be working. Comm. Di Monda stated he was r: uctant to remove landscap g but felt, in this case, limited landscaping would be an enhancement . er what is currently the e. He did not feel the property line was an issue, noting an encroachment pe could be reques d, and if the Commission agreed to the concept, the issue could move forward. Comm. Dettelbach felt the overall "look" of the blo should be considered, noting landscaping could take many forms. He agreed with Comm. Di " on •: that the grey wall across the street needed landscaping of some type. He felt this pro p • sal would ' prove the appearance of the block and supported the application. Chmn. Merl .ted the previou ' business owner had not cared for the landscaping and felt the proposed plans ould improve the street - nvironment. He stated the proposed landscaping could be far superior to at currently there. MOTION by Comm. Suard,,Seeconded by Comm. Di Monda, to APP' OVE CUP 94-7/park 94-3, Conditional Use Permit an Parking Plan amendment to expand seatin: and remove portions of existing landscaping in cofjunction with an existing restaurant at 705 Pier Avue, with the addition that if an encroachment permit is found necessary, it be obtained and the referenc. to "outside dining" be deleted and "waifng area" be added. AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Marks, Suard, Chmn. Merl NOES: None ABS Fj None ABSTAIN: None HEARINGS: 8. SS 93-7 -- A REFERRAL BACK FROM THE MAY 10, 1994 CITY COUNCIL OF A SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION AND METHOD OF DETERMINATION FOR GRADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT. Page 20 PC Minutes 6-7-94 Staff Recommended Action: To review and comment Mr. Schubach stated the Council wished the Commission to review the pluses and minuses of using the closest public improvement versus the property line corners as the grade measurement point. He cautioned the ordinance should allow for contour variances. He explained Staffs concerns and past practices, as well as suggestions by Staff and Comm. Di Monda. Comm. Di Monda explained his theory as to how grade should be measured. He felt the property line should be used, noting measurements from outside the property is arbitrary, unfair and lacked consistency. He felt Staff was confused as to what was meant by "sloping lots", noting he felt the Commission had wanted to follow the contours of the land. He proposed, if the land had small depressions, an average across the property be taken. He felt the issue of raising grade had been handled and dealt with effectively in the past and would be in the future. He felt this method also took away arbitrary discretion in terms of determining building height from the Building Dept. He felt the original intention of the Commission had been to following land contour. He stated he was comfortable with the definition of "grade". Vice-Chmn. Merl invited public comment at 7:47 p.m. No one wished to speak regarding this item, and Chmn. Merl brought the discussion back to the -- Commission at 7:47 p.m. Comm. Suard discussed with Comm. Di Monda the concept relating to minor convex and concave properties, including the method of "averaging". Comm. Di Monda noted the diagram would become part of the Code, which Chmn. Merl felt was crucial to the raised issues. Comm. Di Monda commented that hill sides were not a clean issue, noting that convex might be very relevant in that a lot of vertical distance would result in a sloping plane. If there is any question, the Commission is the final arbiter of the grade determination method. Comm. Marks suggested definition of"minor concave" and "minor convex" features. Comm. Di Monda felt that following the land contour would eliminate a great deal of the arbitrary decisions currently being made, noting the option of applicants coming to the Commission. Comm. Dettelbach felt not each and every contingency could be covered in the ordinance. He felt a effort toward uniformity should be made, with reliance upon Staff to make the discretionary calls required, with the Commission making the decision, if necessary. He felt the recommendation previously made by the Commission to the Council met the requirements, expressing surprise that the Council continued to debate and consider the rejected Staff recommendation. He discussed with Comm. Di Monda the drawings accompanying Comm. Di Monda's recommendation, as well as the applications when measuring sloping properties and determining grade. Comm. Suard supported a combination of the Commission's and Staff's recommendations, not supporting the concept of adjusting the slope to be continuous with the underneath contour. He felt Page 2,1 PC Minutes 6-7-94 the sloping lots had an advantage with potential square feet construction and using Comm. Di Monda's recommendation would give an additional unfair advantage. He supported measurement from the property lines, using a straight line as the most consistent, fair method of measurement. Comm. Dettelbach disagreed with the notion of a straight plane without consideration for slope, feeling that elimination of slope consideration was to potential eliminate property values. He felt consideration for slope should be given. He discussed the straight plane measurement concept with Comm. Suard. Comm. Suard stated he was proposed a combination of the Commission's and Staffs prior proposal which would incorporate a sloped plane with the property corners being the measurement points. Comm. Di Monda stated properties existed that could only be built upon if contour measuring was used. He stated hillside properties were more expensive to build upon and detailed those additional, required expenses. He suggested the Commission needed to address building pads for lots that are flat and sloped. He discussed with the Commissioners and Mr. Schubach instances of varying slopes and the methods of measurement. Mr. Schubach stated Staffs goal was to find natural grade, noting averaging results in more box -type buildings. He explained Staffs previous practices pertaining to. sloping lots and efforts to retain views. Comm. Di Monda stated he agreed with Staff with the exception that measurements should be taken from the property line (considering the existing lot contour), sometimes using a warped plane, and not from the nearest public improvement. Comm. Dettelbach felt instead of stating the four property corners, the statement should be, "from the front of the property to the rear, following the contour of the land." MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Marks, to CONTINUE SS 93-7, A referral back from the May 10, 1994 City Council of a special study and text amendment to add adefinition and method of determination for grade for the purpose of measuring building height, to the July 5, 1994 meeting and to DIRECT Staff to incorporate the graphic and generate a written description which takes into account and covers the Commission's concerns. No objections, so ordered. 9. ' 3-8 -- SPECIAL STUDY REGARDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS PER ED USE LIST. Staff Recommended Acti.: To review and take "straw" vote. Mr. Schubach stated this study was divi e • into four parts; t = "Irst of which was being presented tonight, including Council's comments. He req ed a s . vote as to requiring a CUP and uses to be deleted. Comm. Marks felt "motorcycle repair er� etail" was abrasive to resi. - • s. He suggested simple groups be established; ie: Communicate ndivision -- radio, television, newspaper , .00k stores, news racks, movie theaters, etc. Mr. ubach responded that would be part three of the stu Chmn. Merl ed the proposed deletions were for short-term events that were no on-goin:. Mr. Schubac noted that circus/carnival would require the same permit as filming activities, considere Page ZZ PC Minutes 6-7-94 6. TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING HEIGHT" AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF "GRADE", with an Ordinance for introduction and waiver of full reading. (Continued from meetings of April 12, 1944 and April 26, 1994.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 3, 1994. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded toCouncilquestions. The public hearing opened at 8:45 P.M. Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 8:45 P.M. Proposed Action: To amend the definitions as recommended by the Planning Commission in alternative 1, and provide policy direction to consider a spot elevation made by a surveyor during or at the end of framing to make this a responsibility of the homeowner as other cities do (to eliminate the responsibility of measurements made by the Building and Safety Department); and, to study an alternative- method to measure slopes greater than 1:3. Motion Oakes. The motion died due to the lack of a second. _21 - City Council Minutes os -in -QA vicrw sts14 Action: To return this item back to the Planning Commission with specific policy direction noting the Council's concerns of: consider a spot elevation made by a surveyor during or at the end of framing to make this a responsibility of the homeowner as other cities do (to eliminate the responsibility of measurements made by the Building and Safety Department); and, to study an alternative method to measure slopes greater than 1:3. 'Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. The meeting recessed at 9:07 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:26 P.M. and returned the order of the agenda to "Written Communications". - i`+- _...._. City Council Minutes 05-io-Q4 Paae 2517 ITEM #5: SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION AND METHOD OF DETERMINATION FOR GRADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. TO REVIEW PREVIOUS STAFF REPORTS ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE REFER TO AGENDA PACKETS FROM THE MEETINGS OF APRIL 12, APRIL 26, AND MAY 10, 1994 WHICH ARE AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE OR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. ITEM #5: PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION FOR GRADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. THIS PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED FROM THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 11, 1994. TO REVIEW THE STAFF REPORT, PLEASE REFER TO ITEM #5 IN THE AGENDA PACKET OF OCTOBER 11, 1994. • p . October 17, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 25, 1994 SOUTH PARK - APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the Construction Documents for the South Park Project prepared by J.F. Davidson & Associates, Inc. 2. Direct staff to advertise and open competitive bids for the construction of Phase I of the South Park Project. Background: The City Council at its regular meeting of June 14, 1994 approved the South Park Master Plan with the provision that a 65' x 160' multiple use asphalt playing surface be included in the park design. The design and drafting of the park construction documents have progressed smoothly. These plans have been thoroughly checked and modified as they were developed. A consistent set of plans and specifications is important to the ultimate success of the project. As such, this well conceived South Park plan will save construction costs and insure a fair bid process. Time spent during this design and plan check phase of the project will more than be made up by ease and quality of construction. The Public Works Department would like to express our thanks to Brian Mitchell of the. Parks and Recreation Commission for his assistance in the review of the South Park plans. His background in landscape architecture has proven again to be a real asset to the City of Hermosa Beach. Analysis: J.F. Davidson's plans for South Park provide for a complete park improvement per the approved Master Plan. This plan is then broken into two phases; each with an estimated cost of approximately $300,000. Funding of $299,886 presently exists for Phase I construction. The Phase I improvements shall include: • Demolition and Removal • Earthwork and Grading • Soil Import • Soil Preparation • Construction of the Main Parking Lot • Construction of the Deceleration Lane on Valley Drive • Installation of Concrete Walkways • Construction of Retaining Walls • Construction of the Asphalt Play Court • Installation of the Irrigation System • Installation of Security Lighting Conduit • Installation of Drinking Fountains, Bike Racks and Trash Containers • Hydroseeding of Turf Areas • Hydroseeding of Slope Areas • Planting of 1 and 5 Gallon Shrubs • Planting of 15 Gallon and 24" Box Trees Phase I sets the basis for the park. It provides the outline for future improvements while establishing the turf and play areas necessary for immediate park use. All underground improvements shall be completed in Phase I so as not to disturb newly installed surface betterment's. Phase II of the South Park Project will offer refinements to the basic park provided in Phase I. It will provide additional park equipment and accessories and will complete the park improvements: • Refurbish Exterior of the Existing Structure • Design and Construct ADA Restrooms in Existing Structure • Construction of Upper Access Road and Parking • Installation of Tot Play Area • Construction of Polygon Gazebo • Installation of Shade Structures in Plaza Area • Construction of Open Deck for Existing Structure • Construction of Stairways • Installation of Picnic Tables and Barbecues • Installation of Entry and Tot Signage • Planting of Additional Trees • Installation of Grass Volleyball Courts • Installation of Basketball Backboards and Nets Plans and Specifications for the South Park Project are available for review at the City Clerk's office or Department of Public Works. Attached please find copies of cost estimates for Phase I and II construction. Also attached is a schedule for Phase I of the project. The South Park Project fills a need for park facilities in a section of town lacking recreational improvements. The park, with its connection to the Greenbelt, will provide all Hermosans a beautiful location to relax and play. Fiscal Impact: The South Park Project(CIP 94-515) currently has funding in the amount of $299,886 for the construction of Phase I of the project. Staff is currently exploring potential grant sources to fund Phase II of the South Park Project. Respectfully submitted, _ Joseph Man awich CIP Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact Viki Copeland Finance Director pw/sprkp&s Concur: QM.L— ri L& Amy Amirani Public Works Director Mary Community Resources Director Steve B`urr'i✓II City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION PLAN October 19, 1994 SOUTH SCHOOL PARK CIP 92-515 FUNDING: PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES TAX FUND $ 80,157 GRANT: $219,729 ACTION ITEMS: Scheduled Completion Item Task Date Design Development 1. Final Design submitted to the City 6/1/94 2. Design approval by City Council 6/14/94 Prepare Construction Bidding Documents 1. Begin Construction Documents 6/15/94 2. 75% submittal to the City 7/18/94 3. 100% submittal to the City 11/8/94 Construction phase 1. Bidding 11/10/94 2. Bid Award 12/13/94 3. Pre construction meeting 12/22/94 4. Start construction 1/2/95 5. Grading 2/1/95 6. Irrigation 3/11/95 7. Hardscape construction 4/15/95 8. Complete construction and acceptance by City 6/5/95 9. Maintenance Period 90 days 9/4/95 aa/sspark.sch ono, mom, wimp amp Tims moor M U 4 IMF S UMW ammr saw aimr /Mr J F. Davidson Associates, Inc. WNW MOM' J. ENGINFEPING PLANNING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE r�r:�///lino op afrriri/ioii z c'e'll iie'c •1'wiie'e (9,20) SOUTH SCHOOL PARK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PHASE I - ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST Attachment "B" October 19, 1994 Item Cost Demolition 18,500.00 Grading 23,642.00 Soil Prep (turf) 15,967.80 Lower Parking 20,752.00 Asphalt Play Court 16,000.00 Import Soil 12,800.00 Deceleration Lane 28,282.80 Colored Concrete Walk 58,160.00 Drinking Fountain 1,600.00 Bike Racks 855.00 Trash Container 1,760.00 6' Wide Walk 5,160.00 2' x 4' RWD Header 975.00 3' Retaining Wall 10,500.00 Turf (Hydroseed) 1,492.66 Slope (Hydroseed) 1,496.88 Irrigation 65,366.50 1 -Gallon Shrub (87) 348.00 5 -Gallon ShrubNine (104) 1,456.00 Conduit 11,461.80 TOTAL $296,576.44 JTN:kat 08094:costest: aa2 Corporate Headquarters • 3880 Lemon Street. Suite 300 • P 0 Box 493 • Riverside. CA 92502 • 909/686-0844 • FAX 909/686-5954 tj PR NTED ON RECYCLED RARER Mier- - U UMW U r Mir .Ir .Mr NW Odor - - sow ..r =Nor sow soar elm. .1mm. Item J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCH:'ECTURE '•1 SOUTH SCHOOL PARK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PHASE II - ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST October 19, 1994 Refurbish Existing School Bldg (Option #1) Restroom Rehab. Access Road/Parking (9) Tot. Lot Tot. Signage (11) Polygon Gazebo 12' Shelters (4) Deck at School Stairs (concrete -168 LF) Handrail at Stairs Picnic Tables (15) Barbecues (7) Picnic Table Pads (Concrete -5) Entry Signs (pedestrian -3) Entry Sign (2) Bollards (9) Driveway Gate Bench (10) Tree Grates (12) Grass Voileyball Courts (2) Basketball Backboards and Nets TOTAL JTN:kat 08094:costestaa6 Cost 40,080.00 18,000.00 23,188.00 25,000.00 2,200.00 32,000.00 23,600.00 12,305.00 6,720.00 1,400.00 12,750.00 2,450.00 1,950.00 450.00 10,000.00 1,953.00 850.00 5,000.00 10,200.00 622.00 993.00 231,711.00 Corporate Headquarters • 3800 Lemon Stro4t, Suite 300 • P.O. Box 493 • Riverside. CA 92502.909/536-0344 • FAX 909/585-5954 ii PRINTEC ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 October 17, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council /4--c;-5---- October o-as- Regular Meeting of October 25, 1994 MUNICIPAL PIER SCHEMATIC DESIGN Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council: 1. Listen to the presentation by Kirkpatrick Associates (Pier schematic design Attachment A). 2. Approve the schematic design and provide recommendations for revisions as necessary. 3. Accept Kirkpatrick Associate's work as complete (See Attachment C). 4. Direct staff to prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) for final design, construction documents and construction management. 5. Direct staff to search for sources to fund future phases of the project. Background The preliminary design phase for the Municipal Pier project has been through a significant public review process including initial efforts by the California Coastal Conservancy; the Pier Design Competition (sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce) and Public Hearings at Commission and Council meetings. Council appointed a Pier Subcommittee comprised of two Council Members and one representative each from the Parks and Recreation, Planning and Downtown Enhancement Commissions. At the May 24, 1994 meeting, Council approved a contract with Kirkpatrick Associates to work with the committee in preparing a schematic design that would serve as the conceptual framework for future design efforts. Analysis The Design At a previous workshop meeting, Council expressed concerns that the first design submitted by Kirkpatrick Associates did not meet the City's program criteria. To address those concerns, the committee met with the architects to direct revisions and additions as necessary to ensure that the concept matched well with the City's program. 1 The new design elements include: • Building at the end of the Pier. • Open Plaza that "ties -in" with lower Pier Avenue. • Separating fishing uses from other uses (see fishing platforms). • Upgrade to Lifeguard Headquarters Building (address lifeguard's requests for improvements). • Emphasis on durable construction materials. • Coordinated design efforts with downtown (IBI group). • Can be constructed within the current structural capacity of the Pier. • Phased plan (to accommodate budget constraints). • Flexible design to adapt to different budget scenarios. Request for Proposals With Council's approval, City staff will prepare an RFP for the second and final phase of the design process. This phase will incorporate the scope of work as presented by Kirkpatrick Associates (Attachment B) and will be drafted to include the following: 1. Concept refinement: Though significantly developed, the schematic design is still conceptual. Prior to developing construction documents, the company selected for the job will need to work with the existing design to determine its feasibility (including all necessary soils testing etc.); to recommend changes as necessary; to develop alternative plans for construction materials and furnishings (with cost analysis); to refine the projected budget; develop a project timeline and to ensure that all of these revisions and refinements meet with Council approval. 2. Pier repairs: Through a grant provided by the Coastal Conservancy, Moffatt and Nichol conducted a structural analysis of the Pier. These repairs are rightfully placed as top priority for Phase I of construction. Verification of these recommended repairs, engineering and projecting the cost of the repairs will be necessary. 3. Construction documents: Once the above steps are completed, the company selected for the job will be required to develop and submit working blueprints and all of the material and furniture selections for Pier repair and construction. These documents will provide the City with all of the information needed to proceed with the construction phase. Prior to its distribution, this RFP will be presented to the Pier Subcommittee for review and approval. If requested by the committee, a representative member(s) will work with staff to select the company who will work with the City on the final design phase. 2 Funding As Council is well aware, the City has a $1.5 million allocation from County Proposition A to initiate Phase I of construction. With the objective of seeking funding for all phases of construction, staff has been working diligently to identify additional sources including requesting assistance from the Coastal Conservancy, LA County and other agencies. With an approved schematic design, the City will be in a better position to submit proposals for funds when and if they become available and/or to identify the project's compatibility with new or prospective funding sources. Summary Recognizing the significant strides Council and Commissions have been making in revitalizing the downtown area, staff recognizes the importance pier renovation has in being a cornerstone project for the area. As such, we are anxious to proceed with the final design phase and to initiate construction as soon as possible. If approved, the proposed schematic design will be the first significant step towards bringing this important project to fruition. It is anticipated that the RFP process can be completed and an award of bid can be scheduled for the January 10, 1995 meeting. It is projected that with a rapid transition into the final design phase that the City could begin the construction phase by the end of this Fiscal Year. ATTACHMENTS: A: Schematic design and budget B: Scope of work C: Contract: Kirkpatrick Associates Respectfully Submitted, Ma ney As stant City Manager Concur: Stephen R. Burijell City Manager 3 Amy Amini, Director Public Works Dept. e Grant C. Kirkpatrick AIA Stephen B. Straughan AIA Russell Hatfield ALA Lisa B. Hunnicutt Attachment rt B tt KIRKPATRICK ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS AIA October 18, 1994 DESIGN PHASE SCOPE OF WORK Hermosa Beach Pier Project Prepared for: The Pier Project Subcommittee City of Hermosa Beach, California Prepared by: Kirkpatrick Associates Architects AIA 10801 National Boulevard, Suite 104 Los Angeles, California 90064 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Hermosa Beach Pier Project consists of the development of the Hermosa Beach Pier Plaza and the Pier Enhancement in two distinct stages. Stage I will carry out the required repairs to the pier structure, and develop the new pier plaza on and over the beach at the foot of the existing pier. Stage II will replace the existing building on the seaward end of the pier, construct new fishing platforms, and visually enhance the pier by replacing pier attachments such as guardrails, lighting, furnishings, etc. The components of the Stage I and II, and their corresponding details are described in the Schematic Design Booklet prepared for the City of Hermosa Beach by Kirkpatrick Associates Architects. The following is a Scope of Work for Stages I and II: STAGE I: Field Investigation 1. Coordinate Soils Investigation - This task includes coordinating with the selected Geotechnical Engineer for the soils investigation program. Soils data and design criteria should be developed in a timely manner and presented in a usable format. 2. Coordinate Topography - This task consists of coordinating with the selected surveyor/civil engineer for the creation of the topographic survey of the project site and related data: the limits, detail, form of presentation; etc. 1o8o: National Boulevard, Suite 104 Los Angeles, California 90064 310 474-1616 FAX 310 475-0167 Architecture/Space Planning/Interior Design KAA 3. Investigate Utilities - During this task, the existing utilities will be investigated regarding points of connection, capacity, current condition, and controlling agency. 4. Meetings - This task designation provides for coordination and planning meetings with the project team as well as with the Client. Design Development 1. Pier Repair - During this task, the various types of pier repair required will be defined and repair options analyzed for ease of construction, appropriateness for the location, and cost, as well as specific recommendations for each type of repair. 2. Plaza - Pile Supported Deck - During this task, the pile spacing versus span length will be analyzed, while maintaining architectural requirements, in order to minimize construction cost to the extent practical. Primary structural elements will be sized for cost estimating purposes. 3. Plaza - Soil Supported Deck - During this task, the required structural thickness and subgrade improvements will be determined based on design loading and existing or proposed subgrade soil characteristics. 4. Plaza - Retaining Walls - During this task, retaining options will be analyzed for each significant retained height, and preliminary structural sections determined to the detail necessary for cost estimating purposes. 5. Plaza - Vehicle /Pedestrian Ramp s- During this task, the horizontal and vertical geometry of the vehicle access ramp and pedestrian access ramp will be developed. The structural paving and subgrade section will be designed for the vehicle loads and subgrade soils characteristics. Preliminary design will be carried out for drainage and erosion control elements. 6 Plaza Material and Details- This task consists of the selection, specification, and detailing of materials for the plaza surfaces including paving, edge details, stair and ramp conditions, drain covers, expansion joint detailing, etc. 7. Pier Building Utilities - This task consists of determining the types of utilities required for the existing as well as a future building on the end of the pier. This task also includes estimating the demand load for each utility as input into the overall utility systems of the next task. 8. Pier/Plaza Lighting and Utilities - During this task, the initial design and sizing will be done for each of the utility systems servicing the pier and the pier plaza. As outlined in the Schematic Design booklet, the suggested lighting shall be researched and incorporated into the Pier and Plaza design. This task cannot be separated by the construction stages as the sizing is dependent upon the total demand on each portion of the systems. 9. Lifeguard Headquarters - During this task, the renovation and redesign of the existing Lifeguard Headquarters will be developed. The existing structure will evaluated for necessary repairs. Detailed elevation studies and floor plans will be prepared, as well as details and specific materials. Other requirements, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing services, etc., will be investigated. The specific programmatic functions will be developed based on information to be supplied by the County of Los Angeles. 10. Site Furniture and Features - This task will involve the further developing and specifying of site furniture and features: benches, guardrail, bike racks, trash cans, tree grates, etc. Furniture manufacturers and suppliers will be researched and chosen. For custom work, such as fabricated guardrail or custom precast concrete benches, drawings and specifications will be prepared. Shop drawings from fabricators will be reviewed for approval prior to fabrication. 11. Preliminary Estimates - During this task, construction cost estimates will be prepared for each of the design elements consistent with the degree of design development and the accuracy to which quantities can be predicted. These estimates can then be used to determine the required construction budget. Because it is generally not possible to accurately predict repair quantities, these elements must therefore have high contingencies. 12. Meetings - This task designation provides for coordination and planning meetings with the project team as well as with the client. Final Design 1. Pier Repair - During this task, construction drawings and specifications will be prepared which show the location and estimated extent of required repairs and required details for each type of detail, including specialized materials which may be required. 2. Plaza - Pile Supported Deck - During this task, the preliminary design of the pile supported deck and its structural elements from the design development phase will be finalized. Detailed construction drawings and specifications will be prepared in coordination with corresponding architectural design drawings and details. Pile driving specifications will be written based upon the design requirements and installation recommendations of the geotechnical report. 3. Plaza - Soil Supported Deck - During this task, the preliminary design of the soil supported deck design development phase will be finalized. Detailed construction drawings and specifications will be prepared in coordination with the corresponding architectural design drawings and details. 4. Plaza - Retaining Walls - During this task, each of the retaining elements will be finalized and detailed construction drawing and specifications prepared. Hydrostatic pressure erosion issues need to be addressed. 5. Plaza - Vehicle Ramp - During this task, final drawings will be prepared showing precise vertical and horizontal geometry. Final structural, drainage, and erosion control details will be prepared. 6. Plaza Material and Details- During this task final drawings and specifications for the materials of the plaza surfaces including paving, edge details, stair and ramp conditions, drain covers, expansion joint detailing, etc. will be prepared. 7. Plaza Engineering Details- During this task details will be developed and finalized in accordance with the architectural and safety elements to be installed on the plaza surfaces. 8. Plaza Lighting and Utilities - During this task, final design will be done on the plaza lighting and all utility systems serving, or passing through the plaza area. The chosen lighting shall be specified and detailed construction drawings and specifications will be prepared including details for temporary connections and future extensions. 9. Lifeguard Headquarters - During this task, detailed construction drawings and specifications will be developed and finalized to allow future or concurrent construction of the Lifeguard Headquarters. All drawings must interface properly interface with the development of the new plaza, both present and future work. All other construction documentation will be coordinated: mechanical, electrical, plumbing, etc. 10. Site Furniture and Features - This task will involve the final specifying and ordering of site furniture and features: benches, guardrail, bike racks, trash cans, tree grates, etc. All contacts will be made to chosen furniture manufacturers and suppliers. For custom work, such as fabricated guardrail or custom precast concrete benches, detailed construction drawings and specifications will be prepared. 11. Construction Cost Estimates - During this task, construction cost estimates will be prepared based on the final construction drawings, details, and specifications. Once again it should be noted that the pier repair cost will be estimated with high contingencies as compared with the new construction elements. These new elements can be estimated relatively accurately with regard to quantities. 12. Approvals- This task consists of the response to comments from the approval agencies and processing documentation for approval. 13. Meetings - This task designation provides for coordination and planning meetings with the project team as well as with the Client. Construction Services 1. Pre -Bid and Pre -Construction Meetings - This task consists of attending the Pre -Bid meeting between the City and potential bidders, and the Pre -Construction meeting between the City, the City's construction inspector and/or manager, and the selected contractor. This meeting will answer questions regarding design intent and will also assist in defining responsibilities and procedures to be used during the construction process. 2. Review Shop Drawings - This task consists of receiving, reviewing, marking, and retransmitting required shop drawings submittals in accordance with the procedures established during the Pre -Construction meeting. 3. Respond to Construction Questions - This task consists of responding to question arising during construction regarding design intent or changed conditions in accordance with the procedures established during the Pre -Construction meeting. 4. Construction Progress Meetings - This task consists of attending construction progress meetings as requested by the City. 5. Construction Site Visit - This task requires regular visits to the construction site, to observe and record construction progress for accordance with design intent. Frequency of site visits to be jointly determined by Architect/Engineer and City. 6. Punch List Walk -Through - This task consists of making a visual inspection of the constructed facilities along with the City, the City's Inspector, the Contractor, and other design team members at substantial completion. Also, this task requires making a list (Punch List) of items which have not been completed or do not meet specified tolerances. Such items will require correction before City acceptance of the finished project. 7. Final Walk -Through - This task consists of making a visual inspection of the constructed facilities along with the City, the City Inspector, the Contractor, and other design team members. This task occurs after Punch List corrections have been made verifying that the conditions have been met for City acceptance of the finished project. STAGE II Design Development 1. Pier Fishing Platforms - This task consists of refining the design for the fishing platforms proposed for the seaward potion of the pier. Architectural and structural options will be analyzed for ease of construction, appropriateness for the location, and cost; and specific recommendations for final structural system. Primary structural elements will be sized for cost estimating purposes. 2. Pier Building - This tasks consists of the preliminary design and engineering for the materials, structural, plumbing, and electrical systems for the proposed building and coordination with the architectural requirements. 3. Preliminary Estimates - During this task construction cost estimates will be prepared for each of the design elements consistent with the degree of design development and the accuracy to which quantities can be predicted. These estimates will then be used to determine the required construction budget. 4. Meetings - This task designation provides for coordination and planning meetings with the project team as well as with the Client. KAA Final Design 1. Pier Fishing Platforms - During this task the preliminary design of the fishing platforms from the design development phase will be finalized and detailed drawings and specifications prepared. 2. Pier Building - During this task the preliminary design of the materials, structural, plumbing, and electrical systems for the proposed building from the design development phase will be finalised and detailed drawings and specifications prepared in coordination with the corresponding architectural plans and details. 3. Pier Engineering Details - During this phase architectural and engineering details will be developed and finalized in support of architectural and safety elements to be installed on the Pier surfaces. 4. Pier Lighting and Utilities- During this task final design will be done on the Pier lighting and all utility systems serving the Pier and Pier Building, and detailed drawings and specifications prepared including details for connections to Stage I extensions. 5. Construction Cost Estimates - During this task construction cost estimates will be prepared based on the final construction details and specifications. 6. Approvals - This task consists of the response to comments from the approval agencies and processing documentation for approval. 7. Meetings - This task designation provides for coordination and planning meetings with the project team as well as with the client. Construction Services 1. Pre -Bid and Pre -Construction Meetings - This task consists of attending the Pre -Bid meeting between the City and potential bidders, and the Pre -Construction meeting between the City, the City's construction inspector and/or manager, and the selected contractor. This meeting will answer questions regarding design intent and will also assist in defining responsibilities and procedures to be used during the construction process. Review Shop Drawings - This task consists of receiving, reviewing, marking, and retransmitting required shop drawings submittals in accordance with the procedures established during the Pre -Construction meeting. Respond to Construction Questions - This task consists of responding to question arising during construction regarding design intent or changed conditions in accordance with the procedures established during the Pre -Construction meeting. Construction Progress Meetings - This task consists of attending construction progress meetings as requested by the City. 5. Construction Site Visit - This task requires regular visits to the construction site, to observe and record construction progress for accordance with design intent. Frequency of site visits to be jointly determined by Architect/Engineer and City. 6. Punch List Walk -Through - This task consists of making a visual inspection of the constructed facilities along with the City, the City's Inspector, the Contractor, and other design team members at substantial completion. Also, this task requires making a list (Punch List) of items which have not been completed or do not meet specified tolerances. Such items will require correction before City acceptance of the finished project. 7. Final Walk -Through - This task consists of making a visual inspection of the constructed facilities along with the City, the City Inspector, the Contractor, and other design team members. This task occurs after Punch List corrections have been made verifying that the conditions have been met for City acceptance of the finished project. Attachment "C" PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 24th day of May, 1994 at Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter called the CITY, and KIRKPATRICK ASSOCIATES hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT." WITNESSETH: That the CONSULTANT for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the CITY herein expressed, does hereby agree to furnish to the CITY professional services and materials, as follows: ARTICLE I - Scope of Work CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in Exhibit "A" entitled Proposal for Schematic Design Services and attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. ARTICLE II - Costs " The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or any part of the work performed under this Agreement at the rates and in the manner established in the attached Exhibit "A". Total expenditure made under this contract shall not exceed the sum of $15,000. Any increase in contract amount or scope shall be by express written amendment approved by the City and Kirkpatrick Associates. ARTICLE III - Method of Payment The CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for costs incurred in the performance hereof as are allowable under the provisions of Part 1-14 of the Federal Procurement Regulations. CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed monthly in arrears based upon the hourly services provided. CONSULTANT shall submit invoices in triplicate and addressed to the City, do the Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3884. ARTICLE IV - Subcontracting CONSULTANT shall not be permitted to subcontract any portion of this contract without the express written consent of the CITY. 1 ARTICLE V - Completion Date It is anticipated that a real time frame for the scope items shall be achieved in 90 days from the date hereof, however, the City's Director of Public Works may extend the completion date as required by the scope of this contract. Any contract time extension shall require the express written consent of the Director of Public Works. ARTICLE VI - Accounting Records CONSULTANT must maintain accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred which records and documents fall be kept available at the CONSULTANT's California office during the contract period and thereafter for three years from the date of final payment of Federal funds hereunder. ARTICLE VII - Ownership of Data All data, maps, photographs, and other material collected or prepared under the contract shall become the joint property of the CITY. ARTICLE VIII - Termination This contract may be terminated at any time for breach and the CITY may terminate unilaterally and without cause upon seven (7) days written notice to the CONSULTANT. All work performed pursuant to the contract and prior to the date of termination may be claimed for reimbursement. ARTICLE IX - Assignability CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer interest in this contract without the prior written consent of the CITY. ARTICLE X - Amendment It is mutually understood and agreed that no alternation or variation of the terms of this contract, or any subcontract requiring the approval of the CITY, shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties hereto, and approved by all necessary parties. ARTICLE XI - Non -Solicitation Clause The CONSULTANT warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or persons, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the State shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or, in 2 its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. ARTICLE XII - Equal Opportunity Assurance During the performance of this contract, the CONSULTANT agrees as follows: A. The CONSULTANT will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, sex, creed, color or national origin. The CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, sex, creed, color or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoffs or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. B. The CONSULTANT will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, sex, creed, color or national origin. C. The CONSULTANT will permit access to his books, records and accounts by the applicant agency, the State, the Federal Highway Administration and/or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with this nondiscrimination clause. D. In the event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract, this contract may be canceled, terminated or suspended in whole or in part. ARTICLE XIII - Clean Air Act During the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) as amended. ARTICLE XIV - State Compensation Laws A. In accordance with State Compensation Laws, the CONSULTANT shall carry Worker's Compensation insurance for all persons employed in the performance of services as set forth herein. The CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with a certificate verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the CITY before commencing 3 services under this Agreement. Such policy shall require thirty (30) days notice to the CITY in writing prior to cancellation. In the event that legal action is commenced to enforce or declare the rights created under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of costs and reasonable attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the court. No member of the governing body of the CITY and no other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and in the CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of CONSULTANT by CITY and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both CITY and CONSULTANT. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable federal statues and regulations as amended. The invalidity in whole or part of any provision of the Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable federal statues and regulations as amended. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Steph i&111 City Manager A TEST: \ r Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk 4 CONSUL ; Gra rirar s atrick AIA Princi Kirkpatrick Associates APPR AS TO FO Charles S. Vose, City Atto Exhibit "A" CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTING SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK DESCRIPTION The City of Hermosa Beach wishes to obtain professional consulting services for the purpose of developing a schematic design for the Hermosa Beach Pier Project. SCHEDULE OF TASKS: Task Description Date Program Design Review Initial Meeting with Subcommittee Concept Development Integration of Design Review Items: Prepare schematic design for the Hermosa Beach Pier to include the following changes: • Reference original program from pier design competition. • Correct canopy problem. • Maintain axial view down the Pier from Pier Avenue. • Nothing should go below the existing line of the Pier as security and visibility are extremely important. • Explore building at end of pier: Consider expanding footprint from side-to-side. April 27 May 31 • Bike path: consider creating a walk -your -bike -zone with ballards and/or decor in the plaza and Strand adjacent to Pier (i.e., 15th & 10th Streets) 5 Task Description Date Subcommittee Review Concept Refinement #1 City Council Hearing Concept Refinement #2 • Underslung fishing platforms: explore alternative ways to divide fishing from other uses. • Lifeguard building revisions. • Materials: Define paving material. • Requirements: UBC/ADA/Security/etc. • Details: access/gates/seating/lighting/etc. • Explain lighting elements, must be bright and aesthetically pleasing. • Trees: Can be incorporated but should not be used to separate plaza from Pier Ave. Define the plaza instead of interrupt. • Parking: Trucks and emergency vehicle access to be considered. • Two gates will be required --one at the end of Pier (west) and one at entrance. • Define ample fixed seating. • Prepare scope of work for design phase. Initial Cost Estimating Concept Presentation Anticipate one meeting Integration of review items Workshop Review Integration of Workshop Review Schematic Design Approval Review of Concept Refinement #2 6 June 28 June 28 June 29 -July 25 July 26 July 27 -Aug. 22 Aug. 23 DESIGN FEE AND OTHER EXPENSES: 1. KAA shall be compensated by the Client at the hourly rates described below not to exceed $4,500 per month (estimated 75 hours per month at the average office hourly of $60/hr.). 2. Office hourly rates: Principal: $85.00 Project Manager: $75.00 Designer/Draftsperson: $60.00 Junior Draftsperson: $45.00 Clerical: $40.00 3. KAA shall receive reimbursement for expenses related to printing and presentation materials, messenger/delivery services, etc. per agreement. 4. The cost for Engineers and consultants, such as mechanical, electrical, structural, acoustical, food service, audio-visual, renderers and model makers, etc. when incurred with the prior approval of the City, shall be paid for directly by the City. ITEM #7: MUNICIPAL PIER SCHEMATIC DESIGN A COPY OF THE HERMOSA BEACH PIER SCHEMATIC DESIGN IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. CITY OF HERMOSA B EAC H MEMORANDUM DATE: October 20, 1994 TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COU CIULIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE FROM: STEPHEN R. BURRELL, CITY MANAGER RE: COUNTY LIBRARY FUNDING RESTORATION TO 1992-93 LEVELS Purpose: To provide information on funding restoration by Board of Supervisors and possible steps that the City Council may wish to consider. Background: The Board of Supervisors has allocated $22.5 million from the County General Fund to the Library District. These funds will allow the library to return to its 1992-93 operating level. This means that our branch will be open 5 days a week and book/supply purchases will also be made at the 1992-93 level. The Board of Supervisors also directed that the Library District receive a minimum allocation of $10 million in the 1995-96 budget and the potential for another $10 million if the year end fund balance is greater than 10% of the CAO's estimate. It appears that the County has developed, for now, an approach that will allow all 87 branches of the system to continue to operate at a reasonable level without the special parcel tax that some cities approved. The City Council directed staff, at the meeting of May 21, 1994, to begin the process of withdrawing from the County Library System and secure the funding that is earmarked from the property taxes collected in Hermosa Beach. It would appear reasonable to modify the direction to staff concerning the future of the Hermosa Beach Library. I would suggest that the City Council direct staff to complete the work and refrain from providing the notice of intent to withdraw at this time. It appears that, at least through this fiscal year and probably 1995-96 as well, that the library services through the Los Angeles County System will be at a level that will meet the needs of our residents. This would afford staff the time to completely develop a City operated alternative without the time constraints that immediate action would create. It would also allow our residents and the Friends of the Library to access the operation and determine whether or not the County will be able to maintain the service that we expect. It is also possible that other cities will pursue the independent approach and I believe that we would benefit from this effort. Recommendation: Direct staff to fully develop the entire package to form a City operated library, including the necessary steps to withdraw from the Los Angeles County Library System, and refrain from providing notice of intent to withdraw until December, 1995. County of Los Angeles Public L :brary :3J East Imperial Hwy., P.O. 3ox 7311, i:_ wnev. i J` 940-8461. TELEFAX (310` 303-3032 • ••--'- I V L.. la OCT 1 8 1994 CITY MGR. OFFICE — - J� == "a �— ?A F nEUBEN • iY ! TnnANIAN October 14, 1994 TO: City Mayors 1,6 FROM: Sandra Reuben County Librarian SUBJECT: BOARD ACTION ON COUNTY LIBRARY FUNDING Today the County Board of Supervisors took a number of actions regarding the current and future funding of the County Public Library. The Board voted to retain the community facilities district as a financing mechanism for library services, but to eliminate any charge on the property tax bills for financing services in 1994-95. In place of the CFD revenue for 1994-95, the Board approved an allocation of $22.5 million for the Public Library from the County General Fund. These funds will allow us to restore service in all 87 of our libraries to the equivalent of the 1992-93 service levels for the remainder of the current fiscal year. We will also be able to fully restore our purchasing of new books and other library materials, as well as special programs in our libraries. The Board also established a policy that the County Library will receive a minimum General Fund allocation of $10 million beginning in 1995-96, and instructed the Chief Administrative Office to include this amount in the Library's budget when the CAO presents its 1995-96 budget to the Board. Finally, the Board directed the CAO to establish a trigger mechanism to the County fund balance to provide additional funds for the Public Library. If a year-end fund balance exceeds the CAO estimate by ten percent, up to $10 million of that extra fund balance would go to the Library. We are currently developing implementation plans and schedules for the new hours of operation to restore service levels in all of our libraries as soon as possible. If you have special needs that you would like to see addressed in the service schedule for your city, please contact your Regional Administrator and discuss them. We will try to accommodate your needs to the extent possible. I am pleased to be able to share this news with you. Please feel free to call your Regional Administrator if you have any questions. SFR:DF:jm f:\common\cfd\cities. end c: Each Supervisor Chief Administrative Officer City Managers .'"e ^ nccrcoratea areas of LOS ar C :v a^c s • rnesa• .eon •= Ic:. • _-. • _- I G ::;ceps • • •:_ • Carson • ;,arement • :.on • - _..3 nv • •. .a • _ ,,.n Ea: • are • _: vonte •.. _• an : a•,.c,.: • -'...1r-",'S71-3e-c,11 • r'ccen Mils • H:r;Gn::c :3r*< • __ _...•3C3 • _, .-.,Ora r" 'tS • .C,<e'.vccc • • a_._. • _a r3e • __ •__....-:3 a • Lom,.:a • .vcod • '."3 .3U • . 3.:an • ..u..... .. • - • \.tc... • 3 - :.. .era ,"csemea0 • ban ::S • . ;a, ;C i,�( 02110 ult amOL, �7 3GC0 • Jan Gabriel • Jan;a C.. .3 • ._.Gr. =. ...., _ • ...,..m • c'e (J. • .. diC 3' • .. .5t 3 • ..o -t ...,.,.:.000 • ..est ane �. _ -L 6:. 4 . --9-51 October 20, 1994 City Council Meeting October 25, 1994 VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPOINTMENT - CIVIL SERVICE BOARD - EXPIRATION OF ONE TERM Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council appoint/reappoint from among the two applicants on file (Applications attached) for the term that expired July 15, 1994. Appointment will be for a four- year term with a July 15, 1998 expiration date. Background: At its meeting of September 27, 1994, the City Council directed the City Clerk to advertise and request applications from interested parties with regard to the expired term on the Civil Service Board. A notice inviting applications was posted at City Hall September 29 and published in the Easy Reader October 6 and 13, with a deadline of 6 p.m. Wednesday, October 19, 1994, for submitting applications. A notice was also sent to MultiVision for airing. The seat is presently held by John Wisdom, who is interested in reappointment and has submitted an updated application. In response to the recent notice, one additional application has been received. The applications on file at this time are: Roy G. McNally John Wisdom Elaine Doerfling, City &lerk Noted: Stephen R. Burr City City Manager 10a Name: THE CITY OF HERNOBA BEACH ►-=� OCT! :1,194 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMISSION 1 Ld) .l :O.::a NAME OF COMMISSION C 1 L J \ C"E__ S2D ,. Gr j` \ v� 1. �= � � `�� e IAA L1� Home Phone(s i o) 1 t -:S% -i 1 Address: az-1 ac\ eE_-;) 1 Ez Qc A a, �� 0 2�y Occupation or Profession: P'. \--\( f SE( Na Name of Employer: Ca \' \`C Ci V\ A�1 1 Q 3JL Bus. Phone `ako) X10 -1cx �1 Address of Employer: C3ES \,2c• -1A P(2 , C� ��o2So REFERENCES: 1 r 11 ,1 Local: ),_ ,�.J �k LLA. �� . ,9x),S� Ess 1\-A JAOSA tEAC�1 Professional:M P(c),T V\ ks' o1 `t'oL\CF__ Cc\ -`-j 6F1 Other: t`AR.. ���� A�cE �C �d �\A SCS COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND S VICE (past and present): \A[-%(-/VO1 \\EQ --MSA Ei% c_\ \S C"A M�+MEg. ©C ‘12-- Le_ tuk.oc CAIA MODE_ &,144.A_EUF Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? \-\ (,.) F C -/ k ELSE c_C-_) EL). L_ E__ -tea LOCA C.-�; out__ ._J Esc k\N Ca' AS -�a What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? R)--3 "fib \\,-A )-z C L Q4- \VI- WAc ti Do you have any current obligations or responsib'lities which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes % No (If yes, please list) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. efiS) ty-c- (\LOA \-\f-k.,\-\-Qt- \,)- 1 EPP - C cf 1 v E1 _ k W QLAc ftro QLAY).\--Ac N) nk‘)_D,s-TPA cl 'NO 1 v -i ' s MY MA .S -c Etc ).D k0A- \c- ‘2_, ks-Ta-K- t,Go, \btoE_ ----N\-\J ()) EL k -\A\ C.� of=��� \__\2\vELL afc 0 (� a,_3r .C.PL EAcA _c\kkC)J- P\,L; CAcIA This Commission on meets l A‘ - WC-NJE ?t �.m. p you Do foresee any scheduling pro lems that might make you miss meetings? Yes )(No tA.[‘a_ 9DEE)2, vC4 5-3c Woe ? wc PoL,c - c)Ekc cs Sc�oL p�slI-��� c --r- How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? S1 SCF (\R19 L V is Comments: 6LSt Signed: Date: 1%— _ 6/5/91 Name: 11-i THE CITY OP HERM08A BEACH ;_ 251994 • 2 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMM15S,IO V -p v.. c`°'` .••h / NAME OF COMMISSION �'` l 5 ' Home Phone: 3/4 -3 72_ ge-4 Address: Occupation or Profession: Name of Employer: it Address of Employer: REFERENCES: Local: Local: Bus. Phone: 7/0 -3 72_ --(pa ! / Professional: Other: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? ce)-"—A-4 7„ What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? 1 SUPPLEMENTAL 10 a INFORMATION Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes )04o (If yes, please list) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. This Commission meets on 3,4 �,.1 tl, at SW) p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes Sl'No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 2(0 Comments: Signed: Date: p2 -0y 6/5/91 JOHN WISDOM Contractor 522 24th Place, 310-372-0011 Hermosa Beach, California EDUCATION California Contractors License Service, State License #302334 B.A. and Secondary Teaching Credential, Industrial Arts., CSULB Apprenticeship School, Carpenter's Local 1478 Lumbleau Real Estate School, Sales License Military Construction Techniques, U.S Navy, Seabees EXPERIENCE General Contractor/Developer, South Bay Area Commissioner, Hermoso Beach Civil Serv. Bank Director, Manhattan Notional Bk. 1.0. Industrial Arts Instructor, Long Beach Unified Dist. Carpenter, Bechtel Const. Co. Framing and Concrete, U. S. Navy, Seabees 18 yrs. 3 yrs. 4 yrs. 4 yrs. 2 yrs. 2 yrs Present 1975 Present 1989 1991 - 1988 1972 - 1977 1971 - 1969 1967 - 1969 PROJECTS -JOHN WISDOM, OWNER/DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR: 522 24th Place, Hermosa Beach, (Custom Home) 1450 W. 146th St., Gardena. (14 Subterraneau Townhomes) 1605 W. 145 th St., Gardena (10 Subterranean Townhomes) 223 S. Prospect Ave., Redondo Beach. (Eight Townhomes) PROJECTS -GENERAL CONTRACTOR Owner & Profession Dr. & Josie White, Orthodontist 1407 So. Irena, Redondo Beach (310) 316-8111 Amy & Dan Clement, Internal Revenue Service 1310 Gates, Manhattan Beach (310) 376-6243 Ken Haydis, Real Estate Developer 120 26th St., Manhattan Beach 315 23rd St., Manhattan Beach (310) 545-1068 Laura & Baden Mansfield, Attorney 942 Ninth St., Manhattan Beach (310) 318-1293 Size/Style 8,000 SF Mediterranean 2,572 FS, Cape Cod 4,200 SF, High -Tech 3,700 SF, High -Tech • 4,100 SF, Spanish 3,100 Sq. Ft. 15,680 Sq. Ft. 10,500 Sq. Ft. 13,200 Sq. Ft. Completion Time 10M, 2WK 5M, 1WK 7M, 3WK 6M, 3WK 6M, 1 WK REFERENCES: DICK HILL, Bank of Newport (310) 372- 6883 JERRY COMPTON, Architect (310) 379-8222 BURNET BOURGEOUS, Realtor (310) 374- 8967 JAY STEVENSON, Architect (310) 546-1757 Please feel free to contact the above References or persons under the heading "Projects -General Contractor additional references upon request. i October 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of October 25, 1994 BEACH CITIES TOY DRIVE Recommendation: Approve placement of a bin in the City Hall parking lot for collection of toys by the Beach Cities Toy Drive. Background: The Beach Cities Toy Drive is again sponsoring a new and used (unbroken) toy collection program for needy children. The toy collection program last year resulted in providing over 3,000 unwrapped toys which volunteers from Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach, in conjunction with several local corporate sponsors, wrapped during the one day marathon event. The toys were donated to five local charities that service disadvantaged children who might not otherwise have received any gifts for Christmas or Hanukkah... Those interested in donating toys may take them to the Fire Department or place them in the bin to be located in the City Hall parking lot from November 1st through December 25th. Any and all volunteers are invited to help wrap the toys on Saturday, December 17th, so they can be given to charities for distribution to the children prior to December 25th. Food and refreshments will be served. Any questions about the Beach Cities Toy Drive can be directed to Sam Edgerton at (310) 207-8994. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager lOb `•; r: Pis. . DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL REPOPT OF ACTIVITIES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1994 AMOUNT OF SERVICE YEAR TO LAST YEAR SERVICE PROVIDED THIS MONTH DATE TO DATE SERVICE REQUEST 0 0 0 FIELD HOURS* 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 DOG IMPOUNDED 2 16 21 CAT IMPOUNDED 9 35 33 OTHER IMPOUNDED 10 21 39 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 PRIVATE VETERINARIAN CARE 0 0 0 OBSERVATION 0 2 2 DEAD ANIMAL 16 16 26 HUMANE INVESTIGATIONS 0 0 0 COURT APPEARANCES (hours) 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 ANIMALS PLACED IN NEW HOMES 2 4 15 ANIMALS RETURNED TO OWNERS 1 7 10 LICENSED SOLD 0 0 0 DOG LICENSE CANVASSING 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 *Includes humane education hours MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director, Community Development Department SUBJECT: Community Development Department Activity Report DATE: October 20, 1994 Planning Commission and Downtown Enhancement Commission Staff is preparing Division workprograms for the Planning Commission and Downtown Enhancement Commission (DEC) as part of the consolidation of Planning, Building and Business License Divisions into one department. Responsibilities for administering the activities of the Downtown Enhancement Commission were assumed by the Community Development Department this month. DEC activities included approval of several holiday Chamber sponsored events to promote Downtown business and a holiday banner program. Commercial revitalization activities, a business incentive program and improvements to Hotel Hermosa were also reviewed. The Department has prepared comments on the Downtown Implementation Plan for review by the project consultants. The Plan will be presented to the DEC and Planning Commission in a joint meeting. A listing of new commercial projects is being prepared and updated on a monthly basis for distribution to City Council, Chamber subcommittee members and the DEC. In addition, the Department has established a new team approach in dealing with prospective businesses seeking location in the City which involves providing a complete outline of the steps and related costs for processing building and development permits for the project. Department Reorganization A plan and cost estimate for consolidating the offices of Planning, Building and Business Licensing has been prepared for accommodating the entire Community Development Department on the first floor of City Hall. Department Policies and Procedures were prepared and distributed to Department employees. Planning Division The Planning Division has established a mutually acceptable proposal, with Coastal Commission staff on the proposed Land Use Amendment No. 6 which will reduce Downtown parking restrictions. The item will be presented to Commission 10/14/94. Building Division Staff is proceeding with issuance of the Notice and Order which provides official notification of the City's Unreinforced Masonry Building Seismic Retro -Fit program. Staff has prepared a procedure to retire and/or microfiche plans currently being stored in City Hall. The procedure will be implemented upon approval of the City's proposed Record Retention Program. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION SEPTEMBER 1994 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT NUMBER OF PERMITS CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING 16 30 66 75 PLUMBING 16 19 50 53 ELECTRIC 7 12 27 43 PLAN CHECK 7 15 31 40 SEWER USE . 0 0 2 0 ' RES. BLDG. REPORTS 27 24 - 66 64 COMM. INSPECTIONS 25 19 56 64 PARKS & RECREATION 0 0 0 0 IN LIEU PARK & REC. 0 0 0 0 BOARD OF APPEALS 2 1 2 1 SIGN REVIEW 2 3 12 11 FIRE FLOW FEES 0 0 6 7 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 2 0 3 0 TOTALS 104 123 321 358 TOTALS VALUATIONS $78,297 **INCLUDES STATE SEISMIC FEE $11.37 6,733.32 12,183.94 31,297.75 BUSINESS LICENSE MONTHLY REPORT 42,424.25 REVENUE : $25,012.71 $30,260.82 $95,584.48 $115,367.59 BUILDING** 1,780.37 3,475.80 12,713.46 12,982.07 PLUMBING 1,109.85 1,478.45 2,584.50 3,826.40 ELECTRIC 333.10 1,501.50 1,703.50 5,0340.70 PLAN CHECK 684.00 3,433.19 4,110.56 11,452.08 SEWER USE 0 0 1,333.73 0 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 1,174.50 1,045.50 2,914.50 2,785.75 COMM. INSPECTIONS 1,087.50 826.50 2,536.00 2,770.50 PARKS & RECREATION 0 0 0 0 IN LIEU PARK & REC. 0 0 0 0 BOARD OF APPEALS 325.50 162.75 325.50 162.75 SIGN REVIEW 173.50 260.25 965.00 900.00 FIRE FLOW FEES 0 0 2,013.50 2,510.00 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 65.00 0 97.50 0 TOTALS VALUATIONS $78,297 **INCLUDES STATE SEISMIC FEE $11.37 6,733.32 12,183.94 31,297.75 BUSINESS LICENSE MONTHLY REPORT 42,424.25 REVENUE : $25,012.71 $30,260.82 $95,584.48 $115,367.59 LICENSES ISSUED 134 152 2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 1994 TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING UNITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. SINGLE DWELLINGS 2. DUPLEX DWELLINGS 3. TRIPLEX DWELLINGS 4. FOUR UNITS OR MORE 5. CONDOMINIUMS 6. COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 7. INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 8. PUBLICLY OWNED BUILDINGS 9. GARAGES -RESIDENTIAL 10. ACCESSORY BUILDINGS 11. FENCES AND WALLS 12. SWIMMING POOLS 13. ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS OR REPAIRS TO DWELLINGS 10 36,700. 14. ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS OR REPAIRS TO COMMERCIAL BLDG. 4 32,200. 15. ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS OR REPAIRS TO INDUS. BLDG. 16. ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS OR REPAIRS TO PUBLICLY OWNED BLDG. 17. ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS, REPAIRS TO GARAGES OR ACCESSORY BLDG. 18. SIGNS ' 19. DWELLING UNITS MOVED 20. DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED 21. ALL OTHER PERMITS NOT LISTED: 1.demo portion of sfr. 2.trash enclosure 3.deck,fence, patio door 3 9,397. TOTAL PERMITS: 17 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS:$78,297.00 Total Dwelling Units Permitted: 0 Total Dwelling Units Demolished: 0 Net Change. 0 Net Dwelling Unit Change FY 94/95 -1 Cumulative Dwelling Unit Total. 9704 (Includes Permits Issued) "REVISED FIGURE BASED ON LAND USE STUDY BY THE PLANNING DEPT. 3 October 18, 1994 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL October 25, 1994 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION SEPTEMBER, 1994 STAFF REPORT PREPARED SUBJECT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE APPEAL 0 0 0 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 0 0 0 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) 0 2 2 9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 1 0 1 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 0 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION 0 0 0 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 0 FINAL MAP 1 0 1 1 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 3 0 3 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 0 0 2 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 0 -NONCONFORMING REMODEL 2 1 ' 2 3 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 0 1 0 PARKING PLAN 0 1 0 2 SPECIAL STUDY 3 1 10 5 SUBDIVISION 0 0 0 1 TEXT AMENDMENT 0 0 2 1 TRANSIT 0 0 1 2 VARIANCE 1 0 2 0 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 0 0 MISCELLANEOUS 7 4 12 16 TOTAL REPORT PREPARED 16 12 34 53 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. MEETINGS / SEMINARS MEETINGS 12 21 37 72 WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP PASSENGERS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE HERMOSA BEACH 696 858 2504 3202 REDONDO BEACH 4823 4095 118553 15759 SATELLITE 434 584 1246 1437 The following Activities were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council / Initiated by 1. Special study and text amendment to Article 13 regarding nonconforming buildings and uses. / Planning Commission 2. Special study of zoning requirements for small lots. / City Council and Planning Commission 3. Text amendment to eliminate the requirement of adoption of a resolution of intent for , Planning Commission or City Council initiated amendment to the zoning ordinance. / Staff 4. Text amendment to add tattoo parlor to the commercial permitted use list. / City Council 5. Text amendment re. parking standards for gymnasiums/physical fitness centers. / City Council Long Term Projects Underway 1. Recover permit authority from Coastal Commission. 2. Updating zoning ordinance for compliance with current law, clarification of intent, and procedural correctness. 3. Updating General Plan Elements. CONCUR: Sol : lumenfel Community D; velopment Director NOTED: Stephen R. urrell City Manager y/activity 5 Respectfully submitted, u-Ying Ting Administrative Aide October 13, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 25, 1994 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - SEPTEMBER 1994 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager, includes engineering and management of capital improvement projects. Permit Issued: Type This Month To Date Last FY To Date Sewer Demolition Sewer Lateral Street Excavation Utility Co's Only Dumpster/Strand Banner Permits 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 6 0 0 0 5 3 13 0 0 6 4 4 3 ENGINEERING 0 0 3 The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 92-141 Street Rehabilitation CIP 93-145 Utility Undergrounding CIP 94-146 Street Median Upgrades CIP 94-160 Downtown Imp. Project CIP 92-178 Centerline Monuments CIP 93-302 CIP 92-408 CIP 92-508 CIP 92-515 CIP 94-523 CIP 91-608 NPDES Storm Drain Imp. Sanitary Sewer Imp. Park Irrigation Imp. Develop South School Site Biltmore Park Development Public Works City Yard MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: - Parks/Medians - Traffic Safety - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Building Maintenance - Sewers/Storm Drains - Equipment Service - Street Lighting Parks Division/Medians: Washed down tennis courts at the Community Center. Set up soccer poles at Clark Field. Attended composting classes. Maintained medians city-wide. Repaired plant irrigation at Valley Park, the Greenbelt and the Community Center. Irrigation and plant renovation at 22nd Street. Began tree trimming policy for the City. Removed slide at 10th & Strand. Cleaned storm drains city-wide. Street Maintenance/Sanitation: Patched asphalt at 8th/Palm, the Police Department ramp and at 19th/Hermosa. Removed concrete at 14th/Strand. Cleaned storm catch basins. Removed old water/sewer line from the Pier. Repaired 35th/Strand planter box. Repair bridge on the Greenbelt. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Repaired the Community Center restrooms. Assisted in furniture moves. Responded to emergency sewer plugs city-wide. Assisted with the Pier pipe removal. Opened/repaired and cleaned up storm drains. Repaired sewer rodder. Street Lighting: Installed a Meyers can at 2nd Street parking lot. Assisted in the Pier pipe removal. Rewired and relamped the Police Department garage. Repaired Clark Field scoreboard. Installed new banners on Pier/Hermosa Avenue. Repaired various city hall lights. Relamped traffic signals at Aviation/Ocean. Traffic Safety Division: Repaired/replaced street signs city-wide. Removed extraneous signs on Ardmore/Valley. Installed crosswalk at Morningside/Manhattan. Building Maintenance Division: Repaired windows and painted the foyer at the Community Center. Changed marquee. Repaired Community Service doors. Removed graffiti and repaired restroom doors at Valley Park. Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment. Graffiti Removal: FY 93-94 JULY 1993 AUGUST 1993 SEPTEMBER 1993 OCTOBER 1993 NOVEMBER 1993 DECEMBER 1993 JANUARY 1994 FEBRUARY 1994 MARCH 1994 APRIL 1994 MAY 1994 JUNE 1994 YTD TOTAL Respectfully submitted: Amy Amirani Director of Public Works ty/mon 36.50 Hrs. 58.50 Hrs. 19.50 Hrs. 23.50 Hrs. 17.00 Hrs. 24.00 Hrs. 90.00 Hrs. 14.50 Hrs. 24.00 Hrs. 7.00 Hrs. 18.80 Hrs. 13.00 Hrs. 333.30 Hrs. FY 94-95 JULY 1994 AUGUST 1994 SEPTEMBER 1994 YTD TOTAL Noted: 4 Stephe F : I rrell City Manager 3.50 Hrs. 17.00 Hrs. 2.00 Hrs. 22.50 Hrs. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, SEPTEMBER 1994 October 17, 1994 City Council Meeting of October 25, 1994 STATISTICAL SECTION Finance Administration CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FISCAL YEAR TO DATE LAST FISCAL YR TODATE INVOICES/ACCOUNTS 54 4 160 RECEIVABLE ".:WARRANTS 275 GENERATED PURCHASE ORDERS DISCOUNTS TAKEN UUT EXEMPTIONS FILED TO DATE PAYROLL $2,085 275 $5,626 1029 305 301 1,075 $144.12 $161.92 $844.77 832 772 Full Time Employees 145 144 Part Time Employees 66 63 80 $5,758 844 .1,084 $1,070,69 Finance Cashier CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FISCAL YEAR TO DATE LAST FISCAL YR TO DATE CITATION PAYMENTS DMV PAYMENTS DELINQUENT NOTICES SENT: California Out of State conversion in progress conversion in progress 4,310 366 1,468 1,853 78 10 10,945 788 12,165 1,078 9,330 6,486 97 370 CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FISCAL YEAR TO DATE LAST FISCAL YF TO DATE DISMISSALS 673 :BOOTING REVENUE $3,291 PARKING PERMITS: • 608 $5,710 1,637 $17,349 1 937 Driveway / 1 5 .1. Guest Party Passes 309 243 1,350 1,061 Contractor 1 5 4 2E Daily -0- 3 6 Annual Preferential Transferrable -55 Vehicle 140 130 206 396 40E i. MTA BUS PASSES 46 69 106 ANIMAL LICENSES 95 395 .TRAPS RENTED 126 431 3 10 NOTED: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager ACTIVITY/flt Respectfully submitted: Viki Copeland, Finance Director 2 I IHERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT e 1 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1994 i 1 September . POLICE OFFENSES REPORTED Y This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year ':• One Year Ago Murder 0 0 To Date 0 1 Rape 0 0 71 2 Robbery Assault 08 6 2 6 29 65 25 72 Burglary (Total) Burglaries (Vehicle) 23 9 20 8 279 105 302 112 Burglaries (Residential) Burglaries (Commercial Larceny . 10 4 44 12 0 . 51 145 29 431 167 23 476 Motor Vehicle Theft DUI 9 . 15 13 13 99 . 107 210 229 All Other Offenses 293 265 26861 2598 Disturbance Calls 360 . 291 2410 2386 . PERSONS ARRESTED Adults 82 68 735 795 Juveniles 8 Criminal Citations 125 Bicycle/Skateboard Cites 2 4 5 74 1 35 47 1010 739 17 27 TRAFFIC REPORT 1 ACCIDENTS € Fatal 1 0 0 11 0 _ Injury 6': b 31 10 274 711 79 Property Damage Only CITATIONS 2221 256 Traffic 1 311 Parking I 0 211 2 2713 2187 98 421 Total Calls POLICE i 2204 CALLS FOR SERVICE 1962 20595 19199 i i . I Pg 1 of 2 ^ September This Month This Month Year to Date i Last Year PARKING One Year Ago i ( To Date ENFORCEMENT Parking citations issued Approx 6000 ^ 5743 Approx 54751 49562 Vehicle impounds 50 67 442 510 Vehicle boots 4 ~ 102 ° PARKING ENFORCEMENT Total Pkg Calls 122 CALLS 97 FOR SERVICE 1146 816 ANIMAL CONTROL , A/C citations issued 1u 9 133 ' 141 Total of Animal Pick ups 64 4. of these 55 428 517 # returned to owner 17 # taken to shelter 47 # |mjued, taken to Vet 0 15 39 - 0 114 243 12 93 228 22 # Deceased 25 28 168 - 168 ANIMAL CONTROL Total AC Calls 104 CALLS FOR SERVICE 70 719 518 I. I * indicates information not collected prior to Approx totals of citations i sued is due to hand 1/94 held cites not downloaded by this 4. d Respectfully Submitted, Noted: Steve Buriell, City Manager Val Straser Chief of Police i Pg 2 of 2 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 12, 1994 Regular Meeting of October 25, 1994 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT - SEPTEMBER 1994 CURRENT THIS MONTH STATISTICAL SECTION MONTH LAST YEAR WORKER COMP CLAIMS Claims opened Claims closed Total open Current Employees Active Cases Lost time (Manhours) Safety Non -Safety Liability Claims Claims opened Claims closed Total open Employee -Involved Vehicle Accidents Safety Non -safety Employee Turnover Safety Non -safety 0 5 66 22 4 137 0 2 2 21 0 0 0 0 FY TO LAST FY DATE TO DATE 6 10 3 13 69 0 613 350 340 1 2 22 0 0 1 3 9 12 2 0 0 0 12 5 0 942 6 7 0 2 3 11 Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood, Director Personnel & Risk Management Noted: SteOi r ien R. Burrell City Manager HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1994 Sep 19. 1994 FIRE STATISTICS This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year One Year Ago To Date Total Calls 63 57 520 571 ' (types) False Alarms 4 5 • 37 55 Mutual Aid 1 2 12 4 Paramedic assists 38 28 298 306 Residence Fire 1 6 35 44 Commercial Fire 4 1 25 20 Vehicle Fire .4 2 22 15 Hazardous MtIs, 4 3 27 29 Other 7 10 64 98 Est, Fire Loss 57250 0 210050 33550 PARAMEDIC STATISTICS Total Responses 76 52 579 601 (types) No Patient/aid 6 5 30 53 Medical 29 29 262 274 Trauma 41 18 287 264 Auto Accident 11 6 93 87 Assault 8 2 61 48 Jail Call 3 0 27 36 Transports 43 29 305 291 Base Hosp, Con, 21 24 180 149 Trauma Center 2 0 4 4 W/O R-11 2 2 8 23 INSPECTIONS and PREVENTION (primary) Commercial Assembly This Month This Month Year to Date One Year Ago Last Year to Date 48 38 206 Institutions Industrial 0 0 0 369 0 0 1 Apartments 0 0 1 (re—inspections) Commercial Assembly Institutions Industrial 19 39 175 1 2 4 306 1 18 92 0 0 0 207 0 0 0 Apartments 0 0 0 22 32 92 Fumigations 2 2 0 222 18 11 105 85 0 Noted; Steve Burr Respectfully Submitt ; I y Manager dward Chesson, Acting Fire Chief October 11, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council October 25, 1994 Department of Community Resources Activity Report for September 1994 The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of September. RECREATION PROGRAMMING Kid's Club. The Kid's Club now is more convenient than ever as it has been moved to the campus of Hermosa Valley School. In cooperation with the Hermosa Beach City School District, City staff has been providing the recreation component to the extended day program. There are approximately 50 children enrolled in the program. Over the Line Tournament. Once again Hermosa Beach was the site for a Over the Line Tournament. Ten adult teams took part in this exciting baseball event on the beach at 10th Street. The team from Body Glove captured the championship. Coastal Clean-up. In cooperation with Heal the Bay and the California Coastal Commission, the City was part of the statewide effort to clean up the beach. Over 120 volunteers showed up at the Pierhead on September 17th and collected over 170 pounds of trash. This is a wonderful annual event that helps keep Hermosa beautiful. Hollywood Bowl Excursion. Under the stars, enjoying a picnic and listening to beautiful music were a few of the things that participants to the Hollywood Bowl enjoyed on September 10th. The evening included Kent Nagano and the Halle Orchestras performing "The Planets" set to a laser light show. It was a spectacular evening. Slow Pitch Softball League. Although the professional baseball players have been on strike, this did not stop many locals in signing up for the popular league. Twelve teams joined the league that plays on Sunday and Friday evenings at Clark Stadium. Recreation Class Registration. With the CITY SCENE recreation brochure mailed out to residents, class registration was held throughout the month. The excursion to Cirque du Soleil sold out quickly. The tennis classes and youth production workshop have also been very popular. Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation The Community Center Foundation closed its production of "Lost in Yonkers" on September 24th. The play was well received by the critics and audiences. The next production will be the Tennessee Williams classic, "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof' and it opens on November 5th. „r Upcoming Events: La Mirada Theater Excursion. October 23 Halloween Howl. October 31 Senior Flu Clinic. November 2 Sand Bowl Classic IV. November 5-6 Wizardz! Dinner and Magic Show. November 19 Facility 9/94 User Hours 9/93 User Hours Field 130 117 Theatre 200 199 Clark 134 164 Gym 188 166 Room 8 94 86 Room 10 101 106 Room 12 85 88 DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This Month FY Last Fy Month Last Fy To Date To Date $37,120 $38,249 $109,900 $109,362 Revenue Projection: $381,772 Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 25% of the fiscal year is $109,900 or 29% of the projected figure. Community Resources Department general fund expenditure for 25% of the fiscal year is $106,361 or 24% of the budget FY 1994-95. Respectfully Submitted, Sohn A. Newell Recreation Supervisor Concur: . Rooney, Dir Community Resources i ept. Stephen R. Burrell City Manager The Hermosa Beach Community Re- sources League sources. Indoor' Volleyball'Lea.‘Avill .0:--2-', l'.4..-:,• . - - - - .- - • - • .- ,- ...`siart its:fall season Oct.'2 and will run r44;:thron'ili.Nov..,,27..Games'arepla'yed Sun;:g;i: rgri•?..- . • . g.-- -..-,...day evenings .at the Hermosa Beach s Com- ? 1470 • . , • 0_;,:,:"'.munity .Center:gYmnasiurn.' Leaguefee '.'L'. ..:--a,,, • . .. • WIld.:‘, • • are. $160 per team, with an $8,perrgarne-,;.::-... . %pi... , i."/X • ..e official's fee .and ..a.,...$10-per-player:1-4" .....r,1 ,..-"USLVA annual membership. Registration k.:-...-., forms are available at the 'catiter.Calljtic..-: Jennings at (714) 631=7658 for more in-.".:i:f1.,"'... . rct:..... formtion... • ' : • .. • . •". ::. :../ .,1 t . .%.:..'.,*.;:? • ;;;Y:S.Lk. I ......1 . ( r ermosa offering new programs and classesfor falllwinter • • 11' - ';;.• :r; • : * • -The city of Hermosa Beach is offering a Cirque du Soleil, the 1995 Tournament of wide variety of recreational and educa- Roses Parade, ski trips, a Temecula wine- tional programs for this fall and winter. tasting tour, a Big Bear mountain bike trip Seasonal activities include the commu-'-:,': and numerous senior activities. nity Trick or Treat this Halloween, the ! Adult classes include courses in ball-' Sand Snowmancontest. and the Winter room and Latin dance acting, and comedy Holiday camp for kids. • • improvisation. Youth classes include cre- : LiThe sports calendar includes the atiVe dance, cartooning and ice skating, , . USLVA indoor coed volleyball league, a . Most classes begin Sept. 26. youth ski and snowboard program, slow . Registration for classes for residents pitch leagues;the Sand Bowl Classic IV, 1 and non-residents has already begun. Reg- and youth flag football tournaments, bas- istration for sports activities and excur- ketball league.sAnda youth chess touma-.I'lsions varies with the event. For more in- ment.. *. formation about the city of Hermosa Some of the excursions offered by the .:,Beach?s programs, call the Community city include trips to Wizardz Magic Club, ,Resources Department at 318-0280. • r. ,The Hermosa Beach Comniunity Re- , -i. sources Department is starting a chapter of ;Club Live. This is a Los Angeles Counti•-:: • based organization .dedicated toward the promotion of drugand'alcOhoI4ree-:' lifestyles. Club Live is for students in the' sixth through eighth grades. ;•-__ ;The Hermosa chapter of Club Live will . have monthly meetings and will be in- volved in activities, events and excursions. . Membership is free and members receive discounts at stores and businesses through- out the South Bay. Call 318-0280 for more . ; information. •. • '.• - ;it' ''..-- ...;:., rt • : .•• . . .. agues fonntng :-'-.The Hermosa Beach community Re-' , sourespepartMent's :3 -on -3 basketball • league will start OCC3. 'Games will be -, played A! giepark,Stadium.' There will be four divisions playing Mondays and , . Wednesday: men's open, men's 6-2 and under, coed and men's 30 and older• .. _. -7 League fees are $100 per team and $12 per night fcir officials' fees. Registration - forms are available at the Community Center, 710 Pier Ave. The deadline to enter a team is Sept. 26 at 5 p.m. Call 318- 0280 for more information. •- . -. , . fr.Lx.".• z' -M 1 • '4,1.• • !: • . eam Body..Glove wms Hermosa . , each over-the-lihe tournament ..„ Team Body Glove came out the big winner in the men's open division of the Hermosa Beach over -the -line tournament held last weekend just south of the pier. Players for Body Glove included Jim _Bundy, Carl Taylor, Jim Zambarelli and altemate Mike Lorden. They beat a tough team from Bakersfield, the Sand Crabs, to takethe title. In the men's beginners' division, Foz's d Be ch beat out Pier Bears of Re on o Surf of Hermosa Beach in the final. , Long Beach's Three of a Kind outswat- - ted Burbank's Score Baby to take the coed , division honors. •• •• Tournament director Russ Johnson was • happy with the turnout for the event. c: "It was great the way people showed up • for the event," Johnson said. "It was really a good time." •