Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/13/94W4 ire �' I /:. i i,MINIM AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, December 13, 1994 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. MAYOR Robert Benz MAYOR PRO TEM John Bowler COUNCIL MEMBERS Sam Y. Edgerton Julie Oakes J. R. Reviczky CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Stephen R. Burrell CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PRESENTATIONS: ]PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES OF APPRECIATION TO CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY (BOARD MEMBERS: SCOTT TOLLEFSEN DAVE REIMER RICK LEARNED r5 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited by law from taking immediate action on any Public Participation unagendized item unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency nature. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1) Letter from Karen Johnson dated December 6, 1994 requesting the placement of a Nativity scene in Hermosa Beach. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on November 15, 1994; 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on November 22, 1994; 3) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on November 28, 1994; and, 4) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on November 29, 1994. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to authorize City to participate as a co -permittee in the new NPDES Storm Water Permit and direct staff to work with L A County staff in meeting the permit requirements. Memorandum from Public Works Director � Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. (e) Recommendation toladopt resolutionldeclarine the month of May as "Drought -proofing Month" encouraging voluntary water conservation practices by all water users and the use of recycled water in the Citv of Hermosa Beach. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. Authority for the South Bay Signal Systems Proiect. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. (g) Recommendation to deny the following claim and refer to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: Claimant: Saathoff, John Date of Loss: 9/7/94 Date Filed: 11/29/94 Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 1, 1994. (h) Recommendation to direct staff and Planning Commission to prepare a General Plan amendment and zone change for the City owned property at 702 - 11th Place from Open Space to Commercial for the purpose of sale Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 5, 1994. (i) Recommendation to approve the purchase of Motorola Radio equipment from local area provider. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated December 1, 1994. Hermosa Beach and Proiect Touch for space in tKe Community Cer Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 5, 1994. (k) Recommendation to receive and file the Caltrans Before and After Study of Southbound Peak Hour Curb Parking Restrictions on Pacific Coast Highway and retain the existing curb parking restrictions. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 1, 1994. (1) Request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointments. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 6, 1994. (m) Recommendation to receive and file memorandum regarding the Pier Renovation Proiect Proposal Review. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 6, 1994. (n) Recommendation to award bid for parks maintenance contract to Landscape West. Inc. for the period from January 1. 1995 to June 30, 1998. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 5, 1994. (o) Recommendation to radODt a resolution)aipprovine a Conditional Use Permit for 68 Pier Avenue. emorandum fro Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. p) Recommendation to ado t a resolution)Plannine Commission schedule. Memorandum from Community Developt6nt Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. �a. ORDINANCE NO.94-1122 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RMOSA BEACH, CAL ORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PENAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated November 28, 1994. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD TATTOO PARLORS TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST FOR C-3 ZONE.. NOTE: THIS ITEM WAS PUBLICLY NOTICED. L' 1Mi' .:"l A 'IIUIV UIVIli : MA1'I' :K. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. 4 iz& TEXT AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR RESOLUTIONS OF INTENT TO MEND THE ZONIN RDINANCE AND/OR MAP. Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction om Community Development Director Sol Blumenfel dated December 5, 1994. /6. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 13 REGARDING NON -CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES (CONTINUED OM 4/12, 4/26, 5/10 & 9 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS). Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction om Community Development Director Sol Blume eld dated December 6, 994. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. 1993-94 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDIT REPORTS a. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) 1993-94, INCLUDING REPORT FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITOR Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 5, 1994. b. AUDITOR REVIEW OF 1993-94 APPROPRIATION LIMIT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 6, 1994. 8. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR BILTMORE PARK. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 6, 1994. 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SOUTH PARK. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 6, 1994. 10. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SEWER AND STORM DRAIN VIDEO INSPECTION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 1, 1994. 11. ORDINANCEARDING DISPLAY ADULT MAGAZINES. Memorandum an Ordinance for introduction om City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December , 994. V-12'. UPDATE ANDCCONTRAC APPROVAL FOR "FIRST NIGHT". ACTIVITIES. Memorandu from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1994. 13. REVIEW OF PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated November 28, 1994. 14. OIL PROJECT UPDATE. Memorandum from Deputy City Attorney Steve Quintanilla. 15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. DESIGNATE TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CITY LEGISLATIVE DELEGATE PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 1, 1994. 16. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 5, 1994. 17. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Council member Reviczky to direct the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission and staff to develop a special short-term business license for Fiesta De Las Artes vendors and explore ways to increase local business participation in the Fiesta. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT N AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, December 13, 1994, 6:30pm - Council Chambers, City Hall CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: a. Review and approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on November 28, 1994; and, b. Review and approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on November 29, 1994. 2. MATTERS OF PERSONNEL: PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT Title: City Attorney ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT r ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, December 13, 1994 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 7:07pm, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Council member Oakes ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES OF APPRECIATION TO CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS: SCOTT TOLLEFSEN DAVE REIMER RICK LEARNED Mayor presented plaques to outgoing Cable Board members. JR commented on staff and board efforts and thanked them for their hard work. Mayor noted the passing of Haley Rogers, a resident of North Hermosa. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1) Letter from Karen Johnson dated December 6, 1994 requesting the placement of a Nativity scene in Hermosa Beach. Karen Johnson: Spoke to her letter requesting that council consider allowing the public display of a Nativity Scene, possibly in Greenwood Park. SE/JR MOTION TO ALLOW A CITIZENS GROUP TO PLACE A NATIVITY SCENE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY. VOTE: 3-2 (RB, JB - NO) 1 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on November 15, 1994; 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on November 22, 1994; 3) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on November 28, 1994; and, 4) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on November 29, 1994. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to authorize City to participate as a co -permittee in the new NPDES Storm Water Permit and direct staff to work with L A County staff in meeting the permit requirements. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution declaring the month of Mav as "Drought -proofing Month" encouraging voluntary water conservation Practices by all water users and the use of recycled water in the City of Hermosa Beach. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. (f) Recommendation to approve Memorandum of Understanding between City of Hermosa Beach and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the South Bay Signal Systems Project. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. (g) Recommendation to deny the following claim and refer to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: Claimant: Saathoff, John Date of Loss: 9/7/94 Date Filed: 11/29/94 Memorandum -from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 1, 1994. (h) Recommendation to direct staff and Planning Commission to prepare a General Plan amendment and zone change for the City owned property at 702 - 11th Place from Open Space to Commercial for the purpose of sale. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 5, 1994. PULLED BY RB FOR JIM LISSNER Jim Lissner: Questioned if the property was advertised for sale, listed with a realtor. 11 RB/JR MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 (i) Recommendation to approve the purchase of Motorola Radio equipment from local area provider. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated December 1, 1994. PULLED BY JB JB ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER THE NEW EQUIPMENT WOULD ENABLE SOME OF THE INOPERABLE COMPUTER TERMINALS (MDT) IN THE PATROL UNITS. VS RESPONDED THAT THE MDT EQUIPMENT IS PART OF THE DISPATCH SYSTEM WHICH WILL BE UPDATED IN PHASES OVER APPROXIMATELY FOUR TO FIVE YEARS. Dave Reimer: Asked about the frequency used and who we would be able to communicate with in an emergency, also questioned the portable duplezer ability. VS RESPONDED THAT THE PORTABLE DUPLEXER IS A BACKUP SYSTEM, AND FREQUENCY WILL GIVE US A DIRECT LINK TO COUNTY DISASTER HEADQUARTERS. RB QUESTIONED IF THE 10 EXTRA HANDHELD UNITS WERE NECESSARY, WOULD THEY ONLY BE NEEDED IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY AND, IF SO, WHY COULDN'T THE PARKING ENFORCEMENT UNITS BE USED INSTEAD. VS RESPONDED THAT IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY, PARKING ENFORCEMENT MAY BE NEEDED TO DIRECT TRAFFIC AND THAT THE EXTRA UNITS COULD BE USED AT OTHER TIMES SUCH AS SPECIAL EVENTS. JB/SE MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 3 (j) Recommendation to approve the lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Proiect Touch for space in the Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 5, 1994. (k) Recommendation to receive and file the Caltrans Before and After Study of Southbound Peak hour Curb Parking Restrictions on Pacific Coast Highway and retain the existing curb parking restrictions. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 1, 1994. PULLED BY RB FOR JIM LIS SNER Jim Lissner: Stated that he was not happy with report and felt council should discuss it before taking any action. JB/JR MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT. VOTE: 5-0 (1) Request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointments. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 6, 1994. (m) Recommendation to receive and file memorandum regarding the Pier Renovation Proiect Proposal Review. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 6, 1994. (n) Recommendation to award bid for parks maintenance contract to Landscape West, Inc. for the period from January 1, 1995 to June 30, 1998. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 5, 1994. (o) Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for 68 Pier Avenue. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. PULLED BY JB QUESTIONED THE LEGALITY OF SECTION II, ITEM 2 REQUIRING BUSINESSES TO CONTROL PATRONS OUTSIDE OR IN PARKING LOT. ALSO QUESTIONED THE NEED FOR PAGE 3, SECTION II, ITEM 8. 4 SE/JB AMEND SECTION H, ITEM 2 AS FOLLOWS: "...AND BOISTEROUS ACTIVITIES OF THE PATRONS IMMEDIATELY OUTSIDE THE BUSINESS_. AND IN THE RAPdONG ". VOTE: 5-0 SERB MOTION TO DELETE SECTION II, ITEM 8 VOTE: 4-1 (JR -NO) JR/JB MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION AS AMENDED. VOTE: 5-0 RECESS: 8:55PM RECONVENE: 9:13PM (p) Recommendation to adopt a resolution Planning Commission schedule Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. JB/JR MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON BALANCE OF CONSENT CALENDAR VOTE: 5-0 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. a. ORDINANCE NO. 94-1122 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PENAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated November 28, 1994. JR/JB MOTION TO ADOPT. VOTE: 5-0 7771 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD TATTOO PARLORS TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST FOR C-3 ZONE.. NOTE., THIS ITEM WAS PUBLICT.Y NOTTCED_ uOWE Eg IT wr77 NOT BE. CONSIDERED AT THIS ME . TIN . AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS NOT COMPLETED ACTION ON THE MATTER Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. ITEM WILL BE RE -NOTICED AND CONTINUED 5 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR RESOLUTIONS OF INTENT TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND/OR MAP. Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 5, 1994. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: 7:40PM CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: 7:41PM SE/JB MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE VOTE: 5-0 JR/JB MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING VOTE: 5-0 6. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 13 REGARDING NON -CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES (CONTINUED FROM 4/12,4/26,5/10 & 8/9 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS). Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 6, 1994. JR SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1. 13-2, B. 2 a) TO REFLECT THAT 0-50% DOES NOT REQUIRE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL, AND 50%- 100% REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL. RB: SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1. 13-2. B, 2 b) TO CHANGE "...WITHIN 10% OF EJL4U?,.EW EXISTING SIDE YARD." OPEN PUBLIC HEARING 8:07pm CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING 8:07pm SE SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO ADD TO SECTION 1. 13-2 B AN ITEM fl CONTAINING LANGUAGE REGARDING ANY DESTRUCTION TO PREMISES BY REASON OF ACTS OF GOD, NON -ARSON RELATED FIRES, ETC. SHALL BE GOVERNED BY SECTION 9? -1086. ALSO TO CORRECT THE OMISSION OF PERIODS IN DOCUMENT. SE/JO MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE AMENDMENTS. VOTE: 5-0 JO/JB MOTION OT WAIVE FURTHER READING. VOTE: 5-0 0 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. 1993-94 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDIT REPORTS a. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) 1993-94, INCLUDING REPORT FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITOR Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 5, 1994. b. AUDITOR REVIEW OF 1993-94 APPROPRIATION LIMIT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 6, 1994. COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF DECREASING THE DEDUCTIBLE ON WORKERS COMP INSURANCE BY INCREASING THE PREMIUM. JB/JR MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. VOTE: 5-0 8. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR BILTMORE PARK. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 6, 1994. Parker Herriott: Stated that the plans approved by council are not in compliance with the ordinance. SE/JB MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SOUTH PARK. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 6, 1994. AA NOTED THAT THE HOURLY RATE AS STATED IN THE PROPOSAL FOR THE INSPECTOR HAD CHANGED FROM $75 PER HOUR TO $55 PER HOUR. SE/JR MOTION TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION VOTE: 5-0 10. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SEWER AND STORM DRAIN VIDEO INSPECTION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 1, 1994. SE/JB MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 7 11. ORDINANCE REGARDING DISPLAY OF ADULT MAGAZINES. Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 7, 1994. SE/JR MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE. VOTE: 3-2 (RB,JO-NO) JR/SE MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING. VOTE: 5-0 12. UPDATE AND CONTRACT APPROVAL FOR "FIRST NIGHT". ACTIVITIES. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1994. SE/JO MOTION TO APPROVE CONTRACT WITH AMENDMENTS TO OMIT REQUIREMENT FOR SHUTTLE SERVICE, REDUCE LIABILITY INSURANCE TO 1 MILLION, ALLOW THEM TO USE THE ELECTRICITY FOR MAIN STAGE. VOTE: 5-0 Parker Herriott: Questioned whether event needed a coastal permit. Feels event is nota good idea. 13. REVIEW OF PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated November 28, 1994. JR/JB MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO SEND OUT RENEWAL NOTICES BY 1/19/95, BEGIN OVER-THE-COUNTER SALES ON 2/2/95, SET A DATE CERTAIN OF 3/20/95 FOR THE GRACE PERIOD (ENFORCEMENT BEGINS AT 8:00AM ON 3/20/95), AND TO ACCEPT A RECEIPT FROM DMV FOR PAYMENT OF REGISTRATION AS PROOF OF REGISTRATION TO ISSUE A PARKING PERMIT. VOTE: 5-0 14. OIL PROJECT UPDATE. Memorandum from Deputy City Attorney Steve Quintanilla. JR LEFT DAIS AT 10:54 DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST Rosamond Fogg: Questioned validity of the Stinnett quitclaim deed JB/SE MOTION TO APPROVE THE FORCE MAJEURE BASED ON THE OCTOBER 27, 1994 COURT RULING. VOTE: 4-0 (JR -ABSTAIN) 8 15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. DESIGNATE TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CITY LEGISLATIVE DELEGATE PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 1, 1994. JB/JR MOTION TO APPOINT TWO REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE COUNCIL IN GENERAL. MOTION FAILS 2-3 (SE,RB,JO-NO) SE/JO MOTION TO DESIGNATE MAYOR/MAYOR PRO TEM AS THE DELEGATES TO SENATOR DILLS & ASSEMBLYWOMAN BOWEN. VOTE: 3-2 (JB,JR NO) JR/JO MOTION TO NOMINATE JB AS THE DELEGATE TO ASSEMBLYWOMAN BOWEN. VOTE: 3-2 (SE/RB-NO) 16. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 5, 1994. JR/JO MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO STUDY ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT APPROACH AND INCLUDE BUSINESSES WHO WOULD BE EFFECTED BY THE PROCESS FOR INPUT. VOTE: 4-1 (RB -NO) 17. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL a. Request from Council member Reviczky to direct the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission and staff to develop a special short-term business license for Fiesta De Las Artes vendors and explore ways to increase local business participation in the Fiesta. JR/JB MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF SHORT-TERM BUSINESS LICENSES AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. VOTE: 4-1 (SE -NO) CITIZEN COMMENTS: NONE ADJOURNMENT at 11:38pm to a Closed Session on Tuesday, December 20,1994 at 7:00. 0 - SPREAD MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCiL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, December 13, 1994, at the hour of 7:0 % P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -� • ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz Absent: None �--��jjD'1- PRESENTATION: PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES OF APPRECIATION TO CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS: SCOTT TOLLEFSEN DAVE REIMER RICE LEARNED t PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited by law from taking immediate action on any Public Participation unagendized item unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency nature. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens may also speak: (1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; (2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, • (3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments " . Citizens with comments regarding City management of departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8682 • (b) WRITTEN COMUNICATION 1) Letter from Karen Johnson dated December 6, 1994 requesting the placement of a Nativscene in�(�-� 9���-"t'��/� pH'ermosa Beach. Coming forward to address the Co cil on this item wer Karen Johnson - 608 Hollowell Avenue, Action: To 1. CONSENT CALENDAR The following more routine matters will • be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. Council member requests to remove items from the consent calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) Public comments on the Consent Calendar. City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8683 Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (p), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but • are shown in order for clarity: ( ) Oakes and ( ) Bowler. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held on November 15. 1994; 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on November 22. 1994; 3) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of November 28. 1994: and, 4) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of November 29, 1994. Action: To approve the minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of November 15, 1994; the minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 22, 1994; the minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of November 28, 1994; and, the minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of November 29, 1994 as presented. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER AND TO APPROVE CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. • Action: To ratify the check register, Numbers 2055 through 2150 inclusive, as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8684 • Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORISE CITY TO PARTICIPATE AS A CO - PERMITTEE IN THE NEW NPDES STORM WATER PERMIT AND DIRECT STAFF TO WORK WITH L.A. COUNTY STAFF IN MEETING THE PERMIT REOUIREMENTS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) authorize the City to participate as a co -permittee in the new NPDES Storm Water Permit, to be issued after the current permit expires on June 18, 1995; and, 2) direct City staff to work with the Los Angeles County staff in meeting the permit requirements. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NO OF MAY AS I'DROUGHT-PROOFING MONTH'#, ENCOURAGING VOLUNTARY WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES BY ALL WATER USERS AND THE USE OF RECYCLED WATER IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. Supplemental replacement Resolution (to correct typos) for adoption. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt -Resolution No. 94-S7)) , entitled, DNA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE MONTH OF MAY AS (DROUGHT -PROOFING MONTH' AND ENCOURAGING VOLUNTARY WATER CONSERVATION AND USE OF RECYCLED WATER WHERE POSSIBLE IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA EAC . 10 (f) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR THE SOUTH BAY SIGNAL SYSTEMS PROJECT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8685 Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve • a Memorandum of Understanding entitled, "A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH THE COORDINATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS ALONG FOUR MAJOR ARTERIALS AND SUPPORTING ROUTES IN THE BAN DIEGO FREEWAY (ROUTE 405) CORRIDOR.", wherein the City agrees to cooperate with neighboring jurisdictions to implement coordinated traffic signal control and operate signal improvements on Pacific Coast Highway (State Route 1). (g) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS AND REFER THEM TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 1, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to deny the following claims and refer to the City's Liability Claims Administrator : Claimant: Saathoff, John Date of Loss: 09/07/94 Date Filed 11/29/94 Allegation : Claimant alleges a trip and fall on uneven concrete floor surface while standing on skates at outside eating area of 1286 the Strand (Good Stuff Restaurant). RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION TO PREPARE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND SONE CHANGE FOR THE CITY OWNED PROPERTY AT 702 - 11TH PLACE FROM OPEN SPACE TO COMMERCIAL FOR THE PURPOSE OF SALE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 5, 1994. City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8686 Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct staff and Planning Commission, by minute order, to prepare a General Plan amendment and zone change, and • set for public hearing at the earliest dates before the Planning Commission. (i) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA RADIO EQUIPMENT FROM LOCAL AREA PROVIDER. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated December 1, 1994. c o s To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve purchase of Motorola radio equipment from local area provider; 2) appropriate $11,614 from the designation for Disaster Preparedness in the General Fund; 3) authorize the Chief of Police to make minor changes as necessary within 5 percent of total cost; and, 4) authorize the purchase of the following items for the Police Department: POLICE Police Reserves (10) Portable Radios $9,803.12 Vehicle Radio (3) Mobile Radios 6,447.37 PARKING ENFORCEMENT Dispatch Radio (1) Base Station $1,773.85 Vehicle Radio (4) Mobile Radios 2,078.40 Parking Officers (10) Portable Radios 4,662.00 DISASTER PREPAREDNESS R.A.C.E.S. Radio (1) Desktop Maxtrac $ 832.80 Emergency Radios (10) Portables 8,432.68 Emergency Repeater (1) Portable Duplexer 2,744.45 • for a total cost of $36,774.67 including tax with $27,000 currently budgeted in the FY 1994-95 budget and an additional $11,614 needed from the General Fund. C� City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8687 • (J) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE '11 -ASE AGREEMENT- BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND PROJECT TOUCH FOR SPACE IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 5, 1994. action: Resources to: To approve the Park, Recreation and Community Advisory Commission and staff recommendation 1) approve the Project Touch the Community (312 sq.ft. X through June sq.ft. X $.93 December 31, $3,426; and, one-year lease agreement between and the City for the use of Room C in Center at a rate of $281 per month $.90 per sq.ft.) from January 1, 1995 30, 1995, and $290 per month (312 per sq.ft.) from July 1, 1995 through 1995 for a total rental income of 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the lease. Motion , second The motion carried unanimously. (k) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE CALTRANS BEFORE { AND AFTER STUDY OF SOUTHBOUND PEAK HOUR CURB PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND RETAIN THE EXISTING CURB PARKING RESTRICTIONS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 1, 1994. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Co ing forward to address the council on this item were: i �v Action: To review and congestion approve the staff recommendation to receive, file the study, which shows the rate of related accidents for the entire length of City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8688 • • the project decreased by 17 percent, existing curb parking restrictions. Motion , second The unanimously. and retain the motion carried (1) REQUEST FOR 30 -DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENTS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 6, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to extend for 30 days the temporary appointment of a Clerk Typist, an Administrative Aide and a Senior Building Inspector in the Community Development Department pending final determination of the restructure of that department. (m) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE PIER RENOVATION PROJECT PROPOSAL REVIEW. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 6, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the report regarding the Pier Renovation Project Proposal Review and approve the recommendation of the review committee to readvertise for proposals for the development of construction documents and engineering, set a scheduled opening for January 26, 1995, interview top respondents the first week in February, 1995, and award the contract at the February 14, 1995 Regular Meeting of the City Council. (n) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD BID FOR PARRS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT TO LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JUNE 30, 1998. Memorandum Council from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 5, 1994. City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8689 Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Landscape West, Inc. for the provision of City parks landscape maintenance for a three and one- half year period beginning January 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 1998 for a total cost of $331,164 and consisting of work activities of: turf care, edging and trimming, shrubs, fertilization, irrigation, insect/disease/pest control, soil aeration, thatch control, weed control, tree maintenance, litter control, annual plantings, dead plant replacement, greenwaste reduction, baseball/softball field maintenance, sand play areas, trash pick-up, and restroom maintenance for the following parks landscape areas: a) Valley Park; b) Clark Stadium c) Community Center/Civic Center; d) Edith Rodaway Park; e) Seaview Parkette; f) Fort Lots -O -Fun Parkette; g) Moodust Parkette; h) Greenwood Park; i) Bicentennial Park; J) Kay Etow Park; k) Ingleside Parkette; 1) 4th and Prospect; m) 6th and Valley; n) Scout Park; o) Ardmore & 5th; P) Greenbelt Park; q) Sandhill Parkette; r) 3rd & Prospect ; s) Biltmore Park*; and, t) South Park* (*starting July 1, 1995); and, 2) authorize staff to issue a notice to proceed and issue addenda within budget limitations. • (0) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTIONS APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 68 PIER AVENUE. Memorandum 02� from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994' y Action: To approve the staff recommendation to review and adopt Resolution No. 94-571 ,which sustains the Planning Commission decision, modifies conditions and is entitled, $$A RESSO}LUTION OF THE 1 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ,✓��X� City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8690 u ►� f OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO SUSTAIN THE DECISIONJQZ THE PLANNING COMMISSION, •• a•O.: •. TO APPROVE• •NAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FO RESTAURANT •N -BALE BEER AND WINE TO INCLUDE FUL ALCOHOL, EXTENDED HOURS UNTIL 2:00 A.M. AND ANCILLARY DANCING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AT 68 PIER AVENUE." (p) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION•PLANNING COMMISSION SCHEDULE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 94-57/A,,, which established the Planning commission meeting schedule to one meeting per month to be held on the third Tuesday of each month and is entitled, IIA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING MONTHLY MEETINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.„ 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO, 94-1122 M- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PENAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS. For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated November 28, 1994. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 94-1122., Motion �_, second C. AYES: Bowler, Oakes, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None City Council Xinutes 12-13-94 Page 8691 DROOP • is •: Items 1( ) and ( ) were heard at this time but are shown • in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. At 7:25 P.M., as the time advertised for item 4, the public hearing, had not arrived, the order of the agenda was suspended to go to item 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO BONING ORDINANCE TO ADD TATTOO PARLORS TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST FOR C-3 ZONE.. NOTE: THIS ITEM WAS PUBLICLY NOTICED, HOWEVER, IT WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS NOT COMPLETED ACTION ON THE MATTER. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at P.M. Coming forward to address the Council—9n Phis item were: f�c6x�� The public hearing closed at P.M. • Action: To continue this item to the Regular Meeting of January 24, 1995. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. S. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR RESOLUTIONS OF INTENT TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND/OR MAP. Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8692 from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 5, 1994. • Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at %:-5i P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: The public hearing closed at 7:->qP.M. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. - 1123.N Motion � , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No., g6,9.4=11231 .,entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND SECTION 1501(2) AND (3). INITIATION OF AMENDMENT, TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND/OR MAP." Motions j�—, second AYES: Bowler, Oakes, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None 6. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 13 REGARDING NON -CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES (CONTINUED FROM 4/12, 4Z26, 5210 i 8Z9 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS). Memorandum • and 'Ordinance for introduction% from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 6, 1994. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at g :0.6 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8693 • • The public hearing closed at l:p'-s P.M. 6i I'S Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 1124. Motion <� , second 6--zx- . The tootion carried by a unanimous vote. k., 0/3 J ( Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. �G]�-1124,, entitled, HAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BERMOSli BEACH_ CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND PORTIONS OF ARTICLE 13 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, IN REGARD TO NONCONFORMING USES AND BUILDINGS, FOR PURPOSES OF CLARIFICATION.„ Motion ion I .c.! second /h../J. AYES: Bowler, Oakes, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None The meeting recessed at P.M. The meeting reconvened at P.M. and went to item ??. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. 1993-94 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDIT REPORTS a. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) 1993- 94, INCLUDING REPORT FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITOR. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 5, 1994. Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. M '�/", V---4 '3 '-�' City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8694 Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the 1993-94 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), which includes the report from Coopers • and Lybrand L.L.P., the Citys independent auditors. Motion , second The motion passed by a unanimous vote. b. AUDITOR REVIEW OF 1993-94 APPROPRIATION LIMIT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 6, 1994. Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the 1993-94 Appropriation Limitation submitted by the Citys independent auditors, Coopers and Lybrand L. L. P. S. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR BILTMORE PARK. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 6, 1994. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Public partic pation closed at P.M. l City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8695 • • Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) award the construction contract for the Biltmore Park Project to Delta Landscape, Inc. in the amount of $78,871.99; 2) authorize the Mayor to execute, and the City Clerk to attest, the construction contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) direct the City Clerk to reject all other bids and release all bid bonds; 4) authorize the Director of Public Works to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council, upon completion of work; 5) authorize the transfer of Parks Facilities Tax Funds in the amount of $18,832.50 from the Clark Building Project (CIP 94-523) to the Biltmore Park Project (CIP 94-523); 6) authorize funds in the amount of $6,000 be appropriated from the Lighting and Landscape Fund to the Biltmore Park Project (CIP 94-523); and, 7) authorize the director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within budget. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SOUTH PARR. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 6, 1994.. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at P.M. address the Council on this item were: Public participation closed at P.M. Coming forward to City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8696 • • Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) award the construction contract for Phase I of the South Park Project to Advanced Construction in the amount of $332,679.94; 2) authorize the Mayor to execute, and the City Clerk to attest, the construction contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) direct the City Clerk to reject all other bids and release all bid bonds; 4) authorize the Director of Public Works to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council, upon completion of work; 5) authorize the transfer of $20,000 from the Street Improvement Project (CIP 94-170) to the south Park Project (CIP 94-515); 6) appropriate Lighting and Landscape District Funds in the amount of $30,000 to the South Park Project (CIP 94-515); 7) appropriate Sewer Funds in the amount of $9,000 to the South Park Project (CIP 94-515); and, 8) authorize the director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within budget. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 10. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SEWER AND STORM DRAIN VIDEO INSPECTION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 1, 1994. 9` Public Works Director Amirani responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the qtAff recommendation to: �� 1) approaward contract to . and, 2 ) _deet G� Motion second' unanimous vote. The motion carried by a City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8697 11. ORDINANCE A REGARDING DISPLAY OF ADULT KAGAZINE8. Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 7, 1994. • e presented the repent- and responded to Council questions. q5 Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 94112 Motion second. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. • Final -action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No., �5AK=112#,h entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO CHAPTER 21, OFFENSES -MISCELLANEOUS, A NEW SECTION 21-36, RELATING TO DISPLAY OF BOORS, MAGAZINES AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS IN LOCATIONS OTHER THAN NEWSRACKS." Motion , second AYES: Bowler, Oakes, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None 12. UPDATE AND CONTRACT APPROVAL FOR "FIRST NIGHT". ACTIVITIES. Memorandum from' Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1994. Community Resources Director Mary Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8698 Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the contract with Arts Hermosa for First Night 1995, and determine the amount of liability insurance at $1- 2,000,000. Motion ,'second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 13. REVIEW OF PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Finance Direct rki CoeJland dated� Move er 28,)x. Finance Director Copeland presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. -20 CACi To approve the staff recommendation to receive V and file the information report on the permit parking process. Motion second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. /1 n 14. OIL PROJECT UPDATE. Memorandum from Deputy City Attorney Steve Quintanilla. 1=d�� �( /,a'- /,- fid; ss City Council Kinutes 12-13-94 Page 8699 Action: To 15.MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. DESIGNATE TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CITY LEGISLATIVE DELEGATE PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 1, 1994. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. ction: To designate Councilmember as the City Legislative Delegate for State Senator Ralph Dills. Motion , second The motion carried by a 0 unanimous vote. 6 �v Action: To designate Councilmember as the City ,I Legislative Delegate for State Assemblymember Debra Bowen. Motion, second The motion carried by a • unanimous vote. Q Action: To approve the attendance of the designated Councilmembers to the League of California Cities / reception for the Legislature to be held Wednesday, unanimous v January 18, 1995 between the hours of 5:30 P.M. and 7:30 P.M. at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in downtown Sacramento. Motion second The motion carried by a \/ ote. City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8700 • 11 a. ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 5, 1994. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To direct staff to develop a permit process for entertainment activities and return to Council for a Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 17. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a) Request from Council member Revic$kv to direct the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission and staff to develop a special short- term business license for Fiesta De Las Artes vendors and explore ways to increase local business Rarticipation in the Fiesta. Supplemental memorandum from Carol Duff, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Executive Director dated November 29, 1994. City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8701 Councilmember Reviczky spoke to his request. • Action: To . CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to• address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Wednesday, December 14, 1994 at the hour of A.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, January 10, 1995 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. eel Deputy City Clerk • City Council Minutes 12-13-94 Page 8702 ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, December 13, 1994 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 7:07pm, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Council member Oakes ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES OF APPRECIATION TO CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS: SCOTT TOLLEFSEN DAVE REIMER RICK LEARNED Mayor presented plaques to outgoing Cable Board members. JR commented on staff and board efforts and thanked them for their hard work. Mayor noted the passing of Haley Rogers, a resident of North Hermosa. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1) Letter from Karen Johnson dated December 6, 1994 requesting the placement of a Nativity scene in Hermosa Beach. Karen Johnson: Spoke to her letter requesting that council consider allowing the public display of a Nativity Scene, possibly in Greenwood Park. II SCENE ON PUB IC PROPERTY. VOTE: CITIZENSN TO ALLOW A 32 (RB, TO CE A NATIVITY JB NO) 1 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on November 15, 1994; 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on November 22, 1994; 3) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on November 28, 1994; and, 4) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on November 29, 1994. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to authorize City to participate as a co -permittee in the new NPDES Storm Water Permit and direct staff to work with L.A. County staff in meeting the permit requirements. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution declaring the month of May as "Drought -proofing Month" encouraging voluntary water conservation practices by all water users and the use of recycled water in the ON of Hermosa Beach. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. (f) Recommendation to approve Memorandum of Understanding between City of Hermosa Beach and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the South Bay Signal Systems Proiect. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 29, 1994. (g) Recommendation to deny the following claim and refer to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: Claimant: Saathoff, John Date of Loss: 9/7/94 Date Filed: 11/29/94 Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 1, 1994. 2 (h) Recommendation to direct staff and Planning Commission to prepare a General Plan amendment and zone change for the City owned property at 702 - 11th Place from Open Space to Commercial for the purpose of sale Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 5, 1994. PULLED BY RB FOR JIM LISSNER Jim Lissner: Questioned if the property was advertised for sale, listed with a realtor. RB/JR MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 (i) Recommendation to approve the purchase of Motorola Radio equipment from local area provider. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated December 1, 1994. PULLED BY JB JB ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER THE NEW EQUIPMENT WOULD ENABLE SOME OF THE INOPERABLE COMPUTER TERMINALS (MDT) IN THE PATROL UNITS. VS RESPONDED THAT THE MDT EQUIPMENT IS PART OF THE DISPATCH SYSTEM WHICH WILL BE UPDATED IN PHASES OVER APPROXIMATELY FOUR TO FIVE YEARS. Dave Reimer: Asked about the frequency used and who we would be able to communicate with in an emergency, also questioned the portable duplexer ability. VS RESPONDED THAT THE PORTABLE DUPLEXER IS A BACKUP SYSTEM, AND FREQUENCY WILL GIVE US A DIRECT LINK TO COUNTY DISASTER HEADQUARTERS. RB QUESTIONED IF THE 10 EXTRA HANDHELD UNITS WERE NECESSARY, WOULD THEY ONLY BE NEEDED IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY AND, IF SO, WHY COULDN'T THE PARKING ENFORCEMENT UNITS BE USED INSTEAD. VS RESPONDED THAT IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY, PARKING ENFORCEMENT MAY BE NEEDED TO DIRECT TRAFFIC AND THAT THE EXTRA UNITS COULD BE USED AT OTHER TIMES SUCH AS SPECIAL EVENTS. JB/SE MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 3 (j) Recommendation to approve the lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Proiect Touch for space in the Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 5, 1994. (k) Recommendation to receive and file the Caltrans Before and After Study of Southbound Peak Hour Curb Parking Restrictions on Pacific Coast Highway and retain the existing curb parking restrictions. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 1, 1994. PULLED BY RB FOR JIM LISSNER Jim Lissner: Stated that he was not happy with report and felt council should discuss it before taking any action. 11 JB/JR MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT. VOTE: 5-0 N (1) Request for 30 -day extension of temporary appointments. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated December 6, 1994. (m) Recommendation to receive and file memorandum regarding the Pier Renovation Proiect Proposal Review. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 6, 1994. (n) Recommendation to award bid for parks maintenance contract to Landscape West. Inc. for the period from January 1. 1995 to June 30, 1998 Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 5, 1994. (o) Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for 68 Pier Avenue. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. PULLED BY JB QUESTIONED THE LEGALITY OF SECTION H, ITEM 2 REQUIRING BUSINESSES TO CONTROL PATRONS OUTSIDE OR IN PARKING LOT. ALSO QUESTIONED THE NEED FOR PAGE 3, SECTION II, ITEM 8. 4 SEMJB AMEND SECTION H, ITEM 2 AS FOLLOWS: "...AND BOISTEROUS ACTIVITIES OF THE PATRONS IMMEDIATELY OUTSIDE THE BUSINESS_. AND IN THE PARIONG AREAS.". VOTE: 5-0 11 SERB MOTION TO DELETE SECTION H, ITEM 8 VOTE: 4-1 (JR -NO) ::] 11 JR/JB MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION AS AMENDED. VOTE: 5-0 RECESS: 8:55PM RECONVENE: 9:13PM (p) Recommendation to adopt a resolution Planning Commission schedule. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. JB/JR MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON BALANCE OF CONSENT CALENDAR VOTE: 5-0 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. a. ORDINANCE NO. 94-1122 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PENAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated November 28, 1994. JR/JB MOTION TO ADOPT. VOTE: 5-0 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD TATTOO PARLORS TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST FOR C-3 ZONE.. NO 7HI4IT _M WAS PUBLICLPNOTICF.n_ HOWEVER rT wI r NOT BE. CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING AN THE P ANNIN . COMMISSION HAS NOT COMPLETED ACTION ON TH _ UA ELM Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 7, 1994. ITEM WILL BE RE -NOTICED AND CONTINUED 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR RESOLUTIONS OF INTENT TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND/OR MAP. Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 5, 1994. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: 7:40PM CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: 7:41PM SE/JB MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE VOTE: 5-0 11 JR/JB MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING VOTE: 5-0 6. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 13 REGARDING NON -CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES (CONTINUED FROM 4/12,4/26,5/10 & 8/9 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS). Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated December 6, 1994. JR SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1. 13-2. B, 2, a) TO REFLECT THAT 0-50% DOES NOT REQUIRE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL, AND 50%- 100% REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL. RB: SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1. 13-2, B, 2, b) TO CHANGE "...WITHIN 10% OF ELUUkENT- EXISTING SIDE YARD." OPEN PUBLIC HEARING 8:07pm CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING 8:07pm SE SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO ADD TO SECTION 1 13-2. B. AN ITEM f) CONTAINING LANGUAGE REGARDING ANY DESTRUCTION TO PREMISES BY REASON OF ACTS OF GOD, NON -ARSON RELATED FIRES, ETC. SHALL BE GOVERNED BY SECTION 9? -1086, ALSO TO CORRECT THE OMISSION OF PERIODS IN DOCUMENT. SE/JO MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE AMENDMENTS. VOTE: 5-0 JO/JB MOTION OT WAIVE FURTHER READING. VOTE: 5-0 11 Col MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. 1993-94 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDIT REPORTS a. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) 1993-94, INCLUDING REPORT FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITOR Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 5, 1994. b. AUDITOR REVIEW OF 1993-94 APPROPRIATION LIMIT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 6, 1994. COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF DECREASING THE DEDUCTIBLE ON WORKERS COMP INSURANCE BY INCREASING THE PREMIUM. JB/JR MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. VOTE: 5-0 8. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR BILTMORE PARK. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 6, 1994. Parker Herriott: Stated that the plans approved by council are not in compliance with the ordinance. SE/JB MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SOUTH PARK. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 6, 1994. AA NOTED THAT THE HOURLY RATE AS STATED IN THE PROPOSAL FOR THE INSPECTOR HAD CHANGED FROM $75 PER HOUR TO $55 PER HOUR. SE/JR MOTION TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION VOTE: 5-0 10. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SEWER AND STORM DRAIN VIDEO INSPECTION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated December 1, 1994. SE/JB MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 7 11. ORDINANCE REGARDING DISPLAY OF ADULT MAGAZINES. Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 7, 1994. SE/JR MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE. VOTE: 3-2 (RB,JO-NO) JR/SE MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING. VOTE: 5-0 12. UPDATE AND CONTRACT APPROVAL FOR "FIRST NIGHT". ACTIVITIES. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 7, 1994. SE/JO MOTION TO APPROVE CONTRACT WITH AMENDMENTS TO OMIT REQUIREMENT FOR SHUTTLE SERVICE, REDUCE LIABILITY INSURANCE TO 1 MILLION, ALLOW THEM TO USE THE ELECTRICITY FOR MAIN STAGE. VOTE: 5-0 Parker Herriott: Questioned whether event needed a coastal permit. Feels event is not a good idea. 13. REVIEW OF PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated November 28, 1994. JR/JB MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO SEND OUT RENEWAL NOTICES BY 1/19/95, BEGIN OVER-THE-COUNTER SALES ON 2/2/95, SET A DATE CERTAIN OF 3/20/95 FOR THE GRACE PERIOD (ENFORCEMENT BEGINS AT 8:OOAM ON 3/20/95), AND TO ACCEPT A RECEIPT FROM DMV FOR PAYMENT OF REGISTRATION AS PROOF OF REGISTRATION TO ISSUE A PARKING PERMIT. VOTE: 5-0 14. OIL PROJECT UPDATE. Memorandum from Deputy City Attorney Steve Quintanilla. JR LEFT DAIS AT 10:54 DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST Rosamond Fogg: Questioned validity of the Stinnett quitclaim deed JB/SE MOTION TO APPROVE THE FORCE MAJEURE BASED ON THE OCTOBER 27,1994 COURT RULING. VOTE: 4-0 (JR -ABSTAIN) 8 15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. DESIGNATE TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CITY LEGISLATIVE DELEGATE PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 1, 1994. JB/JR MOTION TO APPOINT TWO REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE COUNCIL IN GENERAL. MOTION FAILS 2-3 (SE,RB,JO-NO) SE/JO MOTION TO DESIGNATE MAYOR/MAYOR PRO TEM AS THE DELEGATES TO SENATOR DILLS & ASSEMBLYWOMAN BOWEN. VOTE: 3-2 (JB,JR-NO) II JR/JO BOWENTION TO �'VOTEJB S 32E SERB--NODELEGATE TO 16. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated December 5, 1994. JR/JO MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO STUDY ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT APPROACH AND INCLUDE BUSINESSES WHO WOULD BE EFFECTED BY THE PROCESS FOR INPUT. VOTE: 4-1 (RB -NO) 17. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL a. Request from Council member Reviczky to direct the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission and staff to develop a special short-term business license for Fiesta De Las Artes vendors and explore ways to increase local business participation in the Fiesta. JR/JB MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF SHORT-TERM BUSINESS LICENSES AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. VOTE: 4-1 (SE -NO) CITIZEN COMMENTS: NONE ADJOURNMENT at 11:38pm to a Closed Session on Tuesday, December 20, 1994 at 7:00. 0 P02 DEC 06 '34 15:18 RE CEIVED DEC 0 6 1994 CITY MGR. OFFICE December 6,1994 Mayor Denz and City Councilmembers City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley T3rive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council, RB: Request to place Nativity Scene in Hermosa Beach Several residentb have expressed an interest in having a nativity scene on display in Hermosa Beach this year. I am, therefore, writing to request that the City Council would allow this display. My understanding is that the City of Hermosa Beach owns a Nativity Sone, Currently in storage, and has in the past displayed it during the Christmas season. I also understand that this is permissible by existing Law. Please place this topic on the agenda of the upcoming Council meeting scheduled for December 13 under "Written Communications." Thank you, in advance, for your consideration. I encourage you to vote in support of this display. E erelyen john nHollowell Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310)379-8893 bl RIEHMAN 7*_Ixe� Nlarketiiw Ad,eni,inu, Public Relationw, December 12, 1994 Dear Councilmembers, RECEIVED DEC 12 1994 CITY 41'4. OFFICE I'd like to express my support for the restoration and re -dedication of our city's Christmas Nativ- ity scene by a private citizen's group. As a lifetime resident, I have long missed this holiday tradition. I hope you will work with citizens of good will to support this effort and secure an appropriate location. Sincerely, f Chris Howell 1623 Aviation Boulevard, Suite B Redondo Beach, Califomia 90278 (310) 374-1830 • FAX: (310) 374-2280 SUPPLEMENTpt INFORMAT!nhi b 1, RECEIVED DEC 1 l 1994 CITY ":?.OFFICE -PQt, se cow s deer �� (Z�i aNJ QA . j;A 1!^��f- 011)c.•Q Or- "ClnSl \o(iG�o /s I 0 Qj t -A L -) .n Li 4, n St: 5- Je PrP C, cot -+(-C)w, u,ure o, J E u-eT- 1- u iti d(e f ST 4 V, jo co v mac, V%k e ��� L J � s� w c. 'j-, be Q� �a Na�ia.�o.\ GvcAJcQ Vol 6e a p'2 4v c;tip- 3 I 'is 0. �ffrJ ,cYE'o. be��� C�sis�in..as o,)r CJv1Stc9eCOA,ate. I rsr6 y n- c z. j 6( 1� y 4CC Z W O W J O CL L- 61 /rr7/'77DEC - 12 1994OFFICE � ^^~�" " bli . VOUCHRE2 11/29/94 15:33 ---> VOID CHECKS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------ 002055 TO 002076 VOID/PRINTER JAN 3 SET-UP NOTE: AN ERROR WAS DETECTED IN THE DESCRIPTION FOR CHECK #2135 AND HAS BEEN MANUALLY CORRECTED ON THE LISTING. AN ENTRY WILL BE MADE IN THE FINANCE SYSTEM TO CORRECT THE ERROR. PAGE 1 14' 0 141 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 2 11/29/94 15:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2077 11/29/94 005344 AMY AMIRANI MONTHLY EXPENSE/SEP & OCT 94 001-4202-4316 50.00 50.00 2078 11/29/94 000894 THOMAS BOHLIN MILES/P.O.S.T. CLASS 001-2101-4312 46.80 46.80 2079 11/29/94 005764 LYDIA BREE FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 147.00 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 210.00 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 231.00 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 21.00 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 21.00 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 84.00 714.00 2080 11/29/94 006136 TERRILL BURNETT SUMMER CLASS REFUND 001-3893 190.00 190.00 2081 11/29/94 000034 BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPOR LASER QUALITY COPY PAPER 001-1208-4305 982.91 982.91 2082 11/29/94 005595 CALIFORNIA CHARTER BUS/COMMUNITY RES TRIP 145-3409-4201 573.09 BUS/COMMUNITY RES TRIP 145-3409-4201 420.03 993.12 2083 11/29/94 005451 VALENTIN CASTRO SAND BOWL TOURNEY DIRECTOR 001-4601-4221 672.00 672.00 2084 11/29/94 005180 VICKI CHANEY FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 891.00 891.00 2085 11/29/94 004317 CHESS FOR JUNIORS JUNIOR CHESS TOURNEY DIRECTOR 001-4601-4201 200.00 200.00 2086 11/29/94 005511 COMPUTER CITY NETWORK SUPPLIES 001-1206-4305 805.62 805.62 2087 11/29/94 006125 RALPH C. CRAWFORD CO., AUTOMATIC FOLDING MACHINE 001-1206-5402 725.17 725.17 2088 11/29/94 006095 CTEC TRUCK BODIES TRUCK BODY/FIRE UTILITY TRUCK 001-2201-5403 2,893.17 2,893.17 2089 11/29/94 002971 JIM CUBBERLEY FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 423.50 423.50 2090 11/29/94 000850 L. N. CURTIS UNIFORMS/GARAFANO & STILLSON 001-2201-4187 359.82 UNIFORMS/GARAFANO & STILLSON 001-2201-4187 589.97 949.79 2091 11/29/94 004299 D.A.R.E. AMERICA D.A.R.E. MERCHANDISE 001-2101-4305 1,213.48 1,213.48 2092 11/29/94 002845 DAILY JOURNAL CITY ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT 001-1203-4201 66.00 66.00 2093 11/29/94 004383 JIM DENNERLINE FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 546.00 546.00 2094 11/29/94 000267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT HIGHWAY MAINT/AUG 1994 105-2601-4251 72.22 HIGHWAY MAINT/AUG 1994 001-3104-4251 72.22 144.44 2095 11/29/94 002055 ELAINE C. DOERFLING PER DIEM ADVANCE 001-1121-4317 62.50 PER DIEM ADVANCE 001-1122-4317 62.50 125.00 2096 11/29/94 000704 THE ECONOMICS PRESS SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL/FINANCE 001-1202-4316 96.03 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL/CASHIERS 110-1204-4316 96.03 192.06 2097 11/29/94 006132 JOHN ELDER FALL CLASS REFUND 001-3893 59.00 59.00 . 4 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 3 11/29/94 15:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2098 11/29/94 006137 ENTRIX, INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSMNT/OIL SITE 001-8608-4201 9,000.00 9,000.00 2099 11/29/94 003533 FIRE APPARATUS INC. LIGHT BAR/FIRE UTILITY TRUCK 001-2201-5403 694.97 694.97 2100 11/29/94 002822 GARTH GAINES MILES/P.O.S.T. CLASSES 001-2101-4312 332.02 332.02 2101 11/29/94 002875 GBH DISTRIBUTING DISPATCH HEADSETS 001-2101-4309 213.33 213.33 2102 11/29/94 006131 KAWNI GILROY FALL ACTIVITY REFUND 001-3894 5.00 5.00 2103 11/29/94 006127 JEFF GRAY ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 001-2110 50.00 • ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 001-3895 6.70- 43.30 2104 11/29/94 004075 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WORKERS' COMP CLAIMS/NOV 94 705-1217-4182 7,251.54 7,251.54 2105 11/29/94 002556 HUNTINGTON HARBOUR TICKETS/COMM RESOURCES TRIP 001-4601-4201 268.00 268.00 2106 11/29/94 005204 ICE CAPADES CHALET FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 197.40 197.40 2107 11/29/94 000667 INTERNATIONAL CONF OF B ANNUAL DUES/C. SWARTZ 001-4201-4315 195.00 195.00 2108 11/29/94 002409 GREGORY KELLY ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 001-2110 50.00 ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 001-3895 8.70- 41.30 2109 11/29/94 005873 LARRY KESSLER FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 196.00 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 56.00 252.00 2110 11/29/94 006133 JON LEE FALL CLASS REFUND 001-3893 45.00 45.00 2111 11/29/94 005072 LINE MASTER PAINT GUN REPAIR KIT 001-3104-4309 66.83 66.83 2112 11/29/94 002832 LINDA LOCKE FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 420.00 420.00 2113 11/29/94 000225 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES VERIFY SIGNATURES/OIL INIT 001-1122-4251 2,497.38 2,497.38 2114 11/29/94 005450 CHAN LY FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 567.00 567.00 2115 11/29/94 005449 GEOFF MARTINEZ FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 357.00 357.00 2116 11/29/94 006126 MIKA MAUNULA FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 378.00 378.00 2117 11/29/94 004138 KENNETH A. MEERSAND LEGAL SERVICES/OCT 94 001-1132-4201 5,600.00 5,600.00 2118 11/29/94 006128 BORIS MITRESKI REFUND TOWING FEES 001-3841 38.00 REFUND TOWING FEES 110-3302-4201 65.00 103.00 2119 11/29/94 006122 EDUARD E. MORF FALL ACTIVITY REFUND 001-3894 15.00 15.00 2120 11/29/94 002734 MICHAEL MURPHY FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 504.00 504.00 2121 11/29/94 001317 NATIONAL SEMINARS, INC. HANDBOOK/CONFLICT SEMINAR 001-4201-4316 10.98 10.98 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 4 11/29/94 15:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2122 11/29/94 006121 FAYEK NUKKARI CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 110-3302 90.00 90.00 2123 11/29/94 006124 PACIFIC SUITES HOTEL ADVANCE/V. COPELAND 001.1202-4317 202.40 202.40 2124 11/29/94 006135 LONNI PARTRIDGE FALL CLASS REFUND 001-3893 47.00 47.00 2125 11/29/94 000950 JOSEPH R. PELKA ADV PENSION PAYMENT/NOV 94 001-2101-4180 2,046.00 2,046.00 2126 11/29/94 002530 PHOENIX GROUP HAND-HELD CITATION FORMS 110-3302-4305 4,223.29 4,223.29 2127 11/29/94 006130 PHONE SUPPLEMENTS, INC. DISPATCH EQUIPMENT PARTS 001-2101-4309 164.44 164.44 2128 11/29/94 005746 KATE PITNER FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 84.00 84.00 2129 11/29/94 000740 UNITED STATES POSTMASTE RENEW BULK MAIL PERMIT 110-1204-4305 75.00 75.00 2130 11/29/94 003991 BARRY REED FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 693.00 693.00 2131 11/29/94 002014 RIO HONDO COLLEGE TUITION/R. SIMPSON 001-4202-4316 36.50 36.50 2132 11/29/94 004997 CHUCK RODRIGUEZ THEATRE TECH/NOV 20, 1994 001-4601-4201 40.00 40.00 2133 11/29/94 004061 SYLVIA ROOT MINUTES SECRETARY/11-2-94 109-3301-4201 258.25 258.25 2134 11/29/94 002859 DWAIN ROQUE FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 145.60 145.60 ALANO CLUB 2135 11/29/94 006120 ROTH 8 ASSOCIATES APPRAISAL/ 109-3301-4201 700.00 APPRAISAL/BODY GLOVE LOT 125-8515-4201 850.00 1,550.00 2136 11/29/94 004623 LAURA R02Z1 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 322.00 322.00 2137 11/29/94 004966 BETSY RUBINO FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 224.00 FAIL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 168.00 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 308.00 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 252.00 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 269.50 1,221.50 2138 11/29/94 001578 ED RUZAK & ASSOC. TRAFFIC ENGR SERV/OCT 94 001-3104-4201 1,290.00 1,290.00 2139 11/29/94 006123 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CONFERENCE REG/V. COPELAND 001-1202-4317 180.00 180.00 2140 11/29/94 003734 WILLIAM SCHNEIDER ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 001-2110 50.00 ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 001-3895 10.70- 39.30 2141 11/29/94 006094 SHERATON HARBOR ISLAND HOTEL ADV/DOERFLING & VALDES 001-1121-4317 174.05 HOTEL ADV/DOERFLING & VALDES 001-1122-4317 174.04 348.09 2142 11/29/94 003505 SHORELINE PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS/P. CORNEAL 001-4201-4305 27.07 REPLACE CHECK LOST IN MAIL 001-4201-4305 27.06 REPLACE CHECK LOST IN MAIL 001-4202-4305 129.90 184.03 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 5 11/29/94 15:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2143 11/29/94 003377 G. SCOTT SMITH FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 201.60 201.60 2144 11/29/94 006129 TEMECULA VALLEY DRYWALL BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 001-3115 126.00 126.00 2145 11/29/94 005992 TENNIS KIDS, INCORPORAT FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 364.00 364.00 2146 11/29/94 004040 NAOMA VALDES PER DIEM ADVANCE 001-1121-4317 37.50 PER DIEM ADVANCE 001-1122-4317 37.50 75.00 2147 11/29/94 003457 WHITLOW EMERGENCY MED G MED SERV/EMPLOYEE WORK INJURY 705-1217-4182 190.00 190.00 2148 11/29/94 005129 WHITMORE, JOHNSON 8 BOL LEGAL FEES/OCTOBER 94 001-1203-4201 426.70 426.70 2149 11/29/94 005125 JOHN M. WORKMAN REIMS PETTY CASH/11-8 TO 11-15 001-1206-4305 47.41 REIMS PETTY CASH/11-8 TO 11-15 001-2101-4305 36.09 REIMB PETTY CASH/11-8 TO 11-15 001-2101-4316 21.20 REIMS PETTY CASH/11-8 TO 11-15 001-2201-4305 1.61 REIMS PETTY CASH/11-8 TO 11-15 001-2701-4305 9.23 REIMS PETTY CASH/11-8 TO 11-15 001-4102-4305 8.64 REIMS PETTY CASH/11-8 TO 11-15 001-4601-4316 20.00 144.18 2150 11/29/94 006134 TACI ZUNZER FALL CLASS REFUND 001-3893 47.00 47.00 TOTAL CHECKS 56,755.99 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 6 11/29/94 15:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING DISTRICT 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 110 PARKING FUND 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 705 INSURANCE FUND AMOUNT 41,891.54 72.22 958.25 4,549.32 850.00 993.12 7,441.54 TOTAL 56,755.99 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 11/29/94 15:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY TMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PjA►`GES / TO _ INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR ///=19/ ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY . • _ fid/ FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE �/T PAGE 7 November 22, 1994 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council December 13, 1994 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the checks listed below. #001063 - 8/4/94 - Shoreline Printing - $156.96 - Account 001-4202- 4305. Warrant was never received by vendor. Payment stopped. #001351 - 9/8/94 - EMS Personnel Fund - Check not needed. It was issued due to misunderstanding by the department. #001577 - 9/29/94 - Mariela Spassova - Check issued to wrong vendor. It was never mailed. #001659 - 10/17/94 - John Bowler - Expenses not claimed in connection with League of Calif. Cities conference. #001884 - 10/27/94 - Redondo Beach Police Dept. - Check was for tuition for two officers. Only one attended. We will be billed. #001654 - 10/17/94 - Robert Benz - Expenses not claimed in connection with League of Calif. Cities conference. #001663 - 10/17/94 - Stephen R. Burrell - Expenses not claimed in connection with League of Calif. Cities conference. Concur: 2 Q Stephenurrell City Man ger M. Workman y Treasurer Noted f r fiscal impact Viki Copeland December 8, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 I TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS II December 27, 1994 NO MEETING 11 January 10, 1994 Follow-up report regarding areas with/without proposed sidewalks (17' setback issue). Hope Chapel Lease Renewal Standard conditions imposed on conditional use permits Master plan of drainage Records Retention Schedule January 24, 1994 Amend Cable Ordinance to add appointment of Cable Board when franchise negotiations begin February 14, 1995 Award of Pier Design contract Community Dev. Director Community Resources Director Community Dev. Director Public Works Director City Clerk Assistant City Manager Public Works Director i� Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Recommendation: November 29, 1994 Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT RENEWAL It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the City to participate as a co -permittee in the new NPDES Storm Water Permit. 2. Direct City staff to work with the L.A. County staff in meeting the permit requirement. Background: The City of Hermosa Beach is a co -permittee in the National Pollutant Discharge elimination System (NPDES) permit to clean up Santa Monica Bay. the permit was issued on June 18, 1990, by the State Regional Water Resources control board to 80 cities within the Santa Monica Bay Drainage Basin plus the county of Los Angeles and Caltrans. Under the permit, the county functions as the principal permittee with the current cities identified as co -permittees. As principal permittee, the county has two major obligations: (1) to carry out permit responsibilities for unincorporated areas and county -owned drainage facilities, and (2) to act as permit coordinator among the various co -permittees, including the consolidation and preparation of permit -mandated reports for Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) review. Analysis: -- - The current permit will expire on June 18, 1995 and a new permit will be issued by the (RWQCB). The permit is divides into 6 water sheds. The City of Hermosa Beach is in Santa Monica Bay- Ballona Creek water shed. The City is required to submit a letter of intent to participate as a co -permittee in the new NPDES permit which will succeed No.CA 00661654. The City staff will continue to work toward a responsible and well-planned implementation of our permit activities in a responsible and timely manner in coordination with the other agencies in the same water shed. Respectfully submitted, Homay n Behboodi Capital Improvement Program Engineer Concur: ai,, Amy Ami ni Director of Public Works IL Stephen R. gUrell City Manager id Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 29, 1994 Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MAY AS "DROUGHT -PROOFING MONTH" Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve and adopt Resolution No. 94- , declaring the month of May "Drought - Proofing month" encouraging voluntary water conservation practices by all water users and the use of recycled water in the City of Hermosa Beach. Background: The California Department of Water Resources has declared an official "Drought Watch" because of low snowfall during the 1993-94 winter. On November 8, 1994, the Metropolitan Water District Board of Directors adopted the Southern California Drought Plan. The attached Resolution is presented at this time as part of the City's commitment to water conservation and Best Management Practices in compliance with the NPDES Permit. Analysis: The Metropolitan Water District Drought Plan contains the following key elements: • Encourage voluntary conservation and implement "Best Management Practices". • Maximize recycled water use (City parks, school grounds and industrial uses). • If needed, buy water from farmers in Northern California. • Develop media advisories and public outreach programs if shortage conditions worsen in 1995. Eighteen (18) other Southern California cities have adopted a drought related resolution (see attached list). If Council adopts this Resolution, staff will return to request that Council make the proclamation at its second meeting in April, 1995. Respectfully submitted, Homay un Behboodi C.I.P. Engineer attachment Concur: (, Amy Ar dani Director of Public Works Steve Burref City Manager lr� 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DECLARING THE MONTH OF MAY "DROUGHT -PROOFING MONTH" ENCOURAGING VOLUNTARY WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES BY ALL WATER USERS AND THE USE OF RECYCLED WATER IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the California Department of Water Resources has declared an official "drought watch" because of low snow -fall during the 1 1993-94 Winter season, and, WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has entered into a partnership with West Basin Municipal Water District and the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles county to drought -proof our city through construction of a recycled water pipeline, and, WHEREAS, environmental organizations, taxpayers groups, Chambers of Commerce, and local leaders support our partnership to drought -proof our city, and, WHEREAS, recycled water produced by our partnership meets stringent state and federal safety requirements, and, WHEREAS, recycled water will make rationing unnecessary in the event of drought thus preserving jobs which stain our economy, as well as the beauty of our city through a plentiful supply of water. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach encourages all industrial processors and irrigators to hoop -up to recycled water, and, City of Hermosa Beach water users are further urged to consider the installation of water efficient plumbing fixtures and the use of drought tolerant landscaping when possible. FURTHER BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach urges all users to consider installation of water efficient plumbing fixtures and the use of drought tolerant landscaping when possible. FURTHER BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach declares the Month of May "Drought Proofing Month." PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this day of , 1994 President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: City Clerk ty/watres APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney E DROUGHT PLAN RESOLUTION CITIES THAT HAVE ADOPTED A RESOLUTION City of Bellflower County of Los Angeles City of Cudahy City of Culver City City of Downey City of El Segundo City of Gardena City of Huntington Park City of Lynwood City of Manhattan Beach City of Montebello City of Norwalk City of Paramount City of Redondo Beach City of Santa Fe Springs City of South Gate City of Torrance City of Whittier 25 20 Q 0 10 k" x Sacramento Basin Runoff 1987 through 1994 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 192 193 194 Water Years u t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE MONTH OF MAY "DROUGHT -PROOFING MONTH" AND ENCOURAGING VOLUNTARY WATER CONSERVATION AND USE OF RECYCLED WATER WHERE POSSIBLE IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the California Department of Water Resources has declared an official "drought watch" because of low snow -fall during the 1993-94 Winter season, and, WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has entered into a partnership with West Basin Municipal Water District and the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles county to drought -proof our city through construction of a recycled water pipeline, and, WHEREAS, environmental organizations, taxpayers groups, Chambers of Commerce, and local leaders support our partnership to drought -proof our city, and, WHEREAS, recycled water produced by our partnership meets stringent state and federal safety requirements, and, WHEREAS, recycled water will make rationing unnecessary in the event of drought thus preserving jobs which sustain our economy. Also, a plentiful supply of recycled water will beautify our city-scape. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach encourages all industrial processors and irrigators to hook-up to SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION N. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 recycled water, and, all users to consider installation of water efficient plumbing fixtures and the use of drought tolerant landscaping when possible. FURTHER BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach declares the Month of May "Drought Proofing Month." PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 13th day of December 1994 President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: City Clerk ty/watres APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 1 ,, Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 29, 1994 Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR THE SOUTH BAY SIGNAL SYSTEMS PROJECT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council of Hermosa Beach approve the attached memorandum of understanding wherein the City agrees to cooperate with neighboring jurisdictions to implement coordinated traffic signal control and maintain and operate the signal improvements. Background: Earlier this year, the City of Hermosa Beach adopted a Resolution of Support for the South Bay Area Signal Project, which allowed MTA (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority) to move forward with the design phase of the project. at this time, in order to allow MTA to move into the construction phase of the project, the South Bay Steering Committee is requesting the city's execution of the attached Memorandum of Understanding between the MTA and Local Agencies for traffic improvements through the coordination of traffic signal systems along four major arterials and supporting routes in the San Diego Freeway (Route 405) corridor. The four subject corridors are as follows: - Pacific Coast Highway/Sepulveda Boulevard (State Route 1) between Los Angeles International Airport and the eastern city limits of Long Beach - Willow Street/Sepulveda Boulevard between Hawthorne Boulevard and the eastern city limits of Long Beach - Western Avenue between 25th Street and the Glenn Anderson Freeway (1-105) - Hawthorne Boulevard between Glenn Anderson Freeway (1-105) and Pacific Coast Highway Analysis: A review of the attached memorandum of understanding and the four projects indicates to staff that the City of Hermosa Beach would have only limited involvement, if any in the projects. The Pacific Coast Highway project through Hermosa Beach would be our affected' area Caltrans currently maintains and operates the traffic signals along this route within our city. Thus, we should not be affected by Section 4 of the MOU which defines the maintenance and operational responsibilities. As a side item Caltrans has been studying this corridors traffic signals the past year and has provided staff with update reports and recommendations that Caltrans will be implementing. We do not anticipate costs to the City for these Caltrans related improvements. Respectfully submitted, Am�mirani Director of Public Works Attached: Memorandum of Understanding ty/ermou Concur: 0-�� Ste✓h . Burrell City Manager I r , A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH THE COORDINATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS ALONG FOUR MAJOR ARTERIALS AND SUPPORTING ROUTES IN THE SAN DIEGO FREEWAY (ROUTE 405) CORRIDOR WHEREAS, the cities comprising the South Bay Transportation Corridor Steering Committee Joint Powers Authority, in conjunction with the cities comprising the South Bay Coordination Committee for Traffic Improvements, the California Department of Transportation, the County of Los Angeles, and the lead agency, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) did adopt resolutions supporting the South Bay Area Signal Project. WHEREAS, the South Bay Transportation Corridor Steering Committee Joint Powers Authority is comprised of the following local agencies: Carson, E1 Segundo, Gardena, --Hawthorne, Hermosa - Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale, Lomita, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, Torrance and County of Los Angeles. WHEREAS, the South Bay Coordination Committee for Traffic Improvements is comprised of the following local agencies: Carson, El Segundo, Gardena, Hawaiian Gardens, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale, Lomita, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, Signal Hill, Torrance, the County of Los Angeles and the California Department of Transportation. -1- I WHEREAS, Local agencies comprising the South Bay Transportation Corridor Steering Committee Joint Powers Authority and local agencies comprising the South Bay Coordination Committee for Traffic Improvements individually and collectively known as "Local Agency" or "Local Agencies". WHEREAS, Local Agencies and MTA by said Resolutions gave their consent to allow the preparation of timing plans to synchronize the traffic signals (subject to review and approval of each affected Local Agency) and to perform appurtenant work along four major arterials: o Pacific Coast Highway/Sepulveda Boulevard (State Route 1) between Los Angeles International Airport and the eastern city limits of Long Beach o Willow Street/Sepulveda Boulevard between Hawthorne Boulevard and the eastern city limits of Long Beach o Western Avenue between 25th Street and the Glenn Anderson Freeway (I-105) o Hawthorne Boulevard between Glenn Anderson Freeway (I- 105) and Pacific Coast Highway _ In addition, work will be performed along several supporting routes, due to their significant relationship with the above four major arterials. WHEREAS, cooperation between neighboring jurisdictions is required to implement coordinated traffic signal controls across jurisdictional boundaries. WHEREAS, Local Agencies have assisted in gathering the necessary data to prepare the design plans. -2- I , WHEREAS, the MTA has allocated Proposition C 25% Discretionary funds in the amount of $3.421 million during FY 1993-94 and FY 1994-95 to implement the first segment of the South Bay Area Signal Project known as the South Bay Area Traffic Signal Systems Pilot Project 1 (the "Project"), which includes the above four major arterials and supporting routes. WHEREAS, this is an ongoing Project entailing improvements " over a 10 -year period, pursuant to the Conceptual Design Study of Traffic Signal Systems Improvements in the South Bay Area of Los Angeles County, dated July, 1993. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 (c), of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the Secretary of Resources designated this type of Project as categorically exempt. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions contained herein, the Local Agencies and MTA agree as follows: SECTION 1. Cooperation with Neighboring Jurisdictions. Local Agencies do hereby consent to cooperate with neighboring jurisdictions to implement coordinated traffic signal control on the four designated major arterials and supporting routes, across jurisdictional boundaries. SECTION 2. Design and Engineering. Local Agencies have assisted in gathering the necessary data to prepare the design plans of the Project. Such design plans have been approved for Package I and the remaining design packages will be approved and signed by all affected agencies, prior to phased implementation. -3- SECTION 3. Construction of the Project. MTA shall be responsible for the construction of the Project including installing the signal hardware, conduits and initial preparation of the timing plans (subject to review and approval of each affected Local Agency) to synchronize the traffic signals. If applicable, the Local Agencies will own the signal hardware, conduits and/or constructed physical facilities in it's jurisdiction except in the case where two conduits exist, MTA will take ownership of one of them. This Memorandum of Understanding does not commit Local Agencies to fund additional improvements. Funding of Project phases will be based on grants available and agreed to by the local agencies for any future local funding. SECTION 4. Maintenance and Operation. The Local Agencies do hereby consent to maintain and operate and to finance their respective jurisdictional share, as defined by ownership and other inter -agency agreements, of the maintenance and operational costs of the improvements installed with the Project within the Local Agency. In order to maintain full effectiveness of these improvements, should the Local Agency determine that a change in signal operation is necessary for any of the signals under the local agencies control within its Local Agency's jurisdictional boundaries and within the Project limits, the Local Agency will coordinate with MTA to ensure that the overall effectiveness of the system is maintained. SECTION 5. Indemnification. Each Local Agency does hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the South Bay Transportation Corridor Steering Committee Joint Powers -4- • Authority, the South Bay Technical Advisory Committee, the South • Bay Coordination Committee for Traffic Improvements, and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority from any liability and expenses caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission on the part of the Local Agency, its employees, agents or anyone directly or indirectly employed by such Local Agency arising from or in connection with any work performed with this Project. The MTA does hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless each Local Agency from any liability and expenses caused in whole or in part by a negligent act or omission on the part of the MTA, its employees, agents or anyone directly or indirectly employed by the MTA arising from or on connection with any work performed with this Project. SECTION 6. Finding of Categorical Exemption. The Local Agencies do hereby find that the Project is categorically exempt from the requirement for an Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 (c), of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. SECTION 7. Counterparts. This agreement may be executed simultaneously or in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. -5- A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING • FOR TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH THE COORDINATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS ALONG FOUR MAJOR ARTERIALS AND SUPPORTING ROUTES IN THE SAN DIEGO FREEWAY (ROUTE 405) CORRIDOR Notice. All notices shall be in writing and personally delivered or deposited in the U.S. Postal Service, first class, postage prepaid, addressed to each party as shown below. Notice of change of address shall be given in the same manner as stated herein for other notices. Notice shall be deemed given on the date deposited in the mail or on the date personal delivery is made, whichever occurs first. City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: (Title) -12- I Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Recommendation: December 1, 1994 Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 RECOMMENDATION TO DENY CLAIM It is recommended that City Council deny the following claim and refer to the City's Liability Claims Administrator. 1. Claimant : Saathoff, John Date of Loss: 09/07/94 Date Filed : 11/29/94 Allegation Claimant alleges a trip and fall on uneven concrete floor surface while standing on skates at outside eating area of 1286 The Strand (Goodstuff Restaurant). A copy of the claim Is available in the Office of the City Clerk for review. In addition to the above, the City has received the following claims which have been resolved: 1. Claimant : Bean, Elaine Date of Loss: 09/02/94 Date Filed 10/25/94 Damage City employee struck claimant's parked vehicle Disposition City authorized payment of $629.46 for repair of vehicle 2. Claimant Marovich, Mark Date of Loss: 11/01/94 Date Filed : 11/02/94 Damage : City employee backed into claimant's vehicle. Disposition : City authorized payment of $1,195.63 for repair of vehicle and use of rental car. Respectfully Su ted, Concur: Robert A. Blackwood kephen Burrell Risk Manager City Manager cc: Bill Fuentes, Colen & Lee mw/deny In • DEPARTMENT CODE: LIABILITY 3/03 L CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY MAIL TO: City Clerk COPIES TO City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive' Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 1. Claims for death, injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later thj Wsix (6)✓r otitfis.iqf* twe q.9y'rrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). ; 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one (1) year after tct`i�reitc*,(Gov.,:Qk je, sec.911.2). 3. Read entire claim before filing. ; 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. f > NamO$Cla4ant last, first fiddle) __--=� l�J�Tlzz} Age /v Ho a Address of ClaimX�i reet, City. State, Zip) Telep one No. • F -( C A--, Business Address of Claimant (Street, City, State, Zip) Telephone No. ddto wlct youtf-S counlcmoons se/regarding this cl W 4D PF1 u0��41 I-cE $� I , 9 Oats of Oamage/Loss/inlury V ` �jC f 61 cl 1 Time A.M. P.M. `. Place of Oamage/Loss/Iniury Z -i✓ 4c5- 5 AN l�CPQM,5A ?D 4CH , e* How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) l ��C �Cl� C f� UJ0C\/-Cn) CGNe•(zE-r� rc.00� Stl� �nGr �; to-ff_f 5TArJDf nib', W tTk SKA s otJ rni rNe 00rs14+r �f}, i'NG Of C' -lot SrJFF tZ�57�tcJQr�nf 7 ►Zi& -046 STF��nfD. Were Police at scene? Yes ❑ NoL�l Report Were Paramedics at scene? Yes C No2,- --- -_ No. What -particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury? �JNc VEt3 N kicIc FuoQ 5�/2F� TO. a �•' ;,.,moss . Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or toss: O less than $10,000.00 If so, state the amount 4N more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jurisdiction) . O more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be' specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimatE F�ACTL12�,� (-E (^i fFNt<LE lir;C�G'R MCLS - lyit_t 3E F'DRrIq 616,M/n1Cs RL-kjai' ED Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). NPV9�4 PER50NNEL/RISK Utrl. THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and item). Name and address of witness(es), doctor(s), and hospital(s): Kl wt t� L�/ �U N /� 751 L l TTLG C� Nf Drt►�`I PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY. For all vehicle damage claims, draw a diagram with the names of streets, and indicate place of incident by 'X' and by sho% ing house numbers or distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter 'A' location of City Vehicle and by 'B' location of yourself or your vehicle If Personal or property damage claim please identify location as completely as possible. CLAIMS INVOLVING VEHICLES E N g W CLAIMS - OTHER (Please draw diagram) HAVE READ THE FOREGOING CLAIM AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF: AND CERTIFY THAT THE SAME IS TRUE OF MY OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS TO THOSE MATTERS WHICH ARE HEREIN STATED UPON MY INFORMATION AND BELIEF: AND AS TO THOSE MATTERS I BELIEVE IT TO BE TRUE. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Dated (0-/ � 3 Sig NOTE: PRESENTATION OF A FALSE CLAIM IS PUNTS ;i MAC. December 5, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council December 13, 1994 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE INITIATED BY STAFF LOCATION: ALANO CLUB, CITY OWNED PROPERTY AT 702 11 TH PLACE PURPOSE: TO AMEND AND REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM OPEN SPACE, TO COMMERCIAL FOR THE PURPOSE OF SALE Recommendation By minute order, direct staff and Planning Commission to prepare a General Plan amendment and zone change, and set for public hearing at the earliest dates before the Planning Commission. Analysis The Alano Club Inc. has made an offer to purchase the City owned club property. The purchase price of $350,000 was acceptable to the City and escrow has been opened. Proceeds from the sale will be used for downtown improvement projects including parking. Under the contract of sale, the current zoning must be changed to commercial making the current use (Alano Club) a permitted, rather nonconforming use. CONCUR: of umenld Community evelopment Director Stephen R. ' rre 1 City Manager y\c: ccsalano Res ct 11 su .tte Michael Schubach Planning Director 1h N :i December 1, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular meeting December 13, 1994 RADIO EQUIPMENT PURCHASE FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT— RESERVES — PARKING ENFORCEMENT -- DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RECOMMENDATION: , It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve purchase of Motorola radio equipment from local area provider. 2. Appropriate $11,614 from the designation for Disaster Preparedness in the General Fund. 3. Authorize the Chief of Police to make minor changes as necessary within 5% of total cost. 4. Authorize the purchase of the following items for the Police Department: POLICE Police Reserves - (10) Portable Radios Vehicle Radio - (3) Mobile Radios PARKING ENFORCEMENT Dispatch Radio - Vehicle Radio - Parking Officers - (1) Base Station (4) Mobile Radios (10) Portable Radios DISASTER PREPAREDNESS R.A.C.E.S Radio Emergency Radios Emergency Repeater (1) Desktop Maxtrac (10) Portables (1) Portable Duplexer $9,803.12 $6,447.37 $1,773.85 $2,078.40 $4,662.00 $832.80 $8,432.68 $2,744.45 ii BACKGROUND: The purchase of the above described communications equipment for the Police and Parking Enforcement was authorized and funds were appropriated in the 1994/95 adopted budget. $17,500 is designated for Disaster Preparedness in the General Fund. We are requesting City Council to approve these purchases based on current manufacturers suggested prices. ANALYSIS: The recommended purchase is geared towards upgrading existing radio systems, replacing obsolete equipment for which parts are no longer available and providing some minor backbone replacement system during times of disaster response. A one time comprehensive purchase of essential communications equipment is both economical and highly effective in replacing the communication infrastructure of the city to meet its public safety requirements. The lack of any communications equipment for impending natural disaster will begin to be addressed. This purchase will provide a portable radio base station for police services, a direct link desk top radio/receiver to LA County Disaster Response Headquarters and ten portable handheld radios for city officials and employees to use during a disaster response in the city or any other major event. It is imperative we do not repeat the mistakes of the past by corrupting a quality Motorola based communication equipment system with inferior product lines which do not meet usage requirements and reach rapid product obsolescence. For this reason, staff is requesting that Council allow us to purchase compatible, uniform, quality Motorola communications equipment which has stood the test of product reliability by its users, the Police and Fire Departments who must rely on this equipment. It is Motorola Inc.'s policy to direct all equipment purchases to the local authorized dealership in the area. ,Ak, FISCAL IMPACT The estimated cost of the entire equipment purchase is $36,774.67 including tax. The total budgeted amount for Police and Parking Enforcement is $27,000. An additional $11,614 is neededfor the Disaster Preparedness and a S% contingency. including the Disaster Preparedness. 7y; s bmitted, C cur: - 1)1-� VAL STRASER STE44MN R. BURRELL CHIEF OF POLLICE CITY MANAGER Noted for Fiscal Impact: x� VIKE COPELAND FINANCE DIRECTOR ,December 5, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council PROJECT TOUCH LEASE RENEWAL Room C Recommendation Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch to lease space in the Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached lease. Background Project Touch presently leases Room C, 3 and 11 in the Community Center. They have been tenants in the Center since October, 1979. Project Touch is a juvenile diversion program whose services include social and educational enrichment, counseling, meals, wilderness challenge camping and stepteen/stepfamily groups. They have served the needs of the South Bay Community's high risk youth and their families for over 16 years. Analysis The lease space for Room C is 312 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $281 ($.90 sq. ft.). The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental policy (approved by Council on February 9, 1993) with all other conditions of the former lease remaining the same. Their residency in the Community Center has been of great value in addressing a vital social service function in Hermosa Beach. Fiscal Impact: $3,426 Estimated revenue for 1994-95. Concur: Ma CE�ney, Director Co unity Resources Dept. Stephen F,,/Bi City Manager Respectfully submitted, Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Dept. ii HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 13th day of December, 1994, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Proiect Touch (Lessee). A. Recitals: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Community Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One 1 year commencing on the 1 st day of January, 1995, and ending on the 31 st day of December , 1995. 2. Description of Premises. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room C - 312 sq. ft. in the Community Center 3. Rent. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent according to the following schedule: January 1, 1995 through June 30, 1995: $281 per month ($.90) sq. ft. July 1, 1995 through December 31. 1995: $290 per month ($.93) so. ft. Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental payment on the first day of the following month. 3A. Other Conditions. The following additional conditions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises/building or placed in any windows. 3. All window treatments must receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. All remodel work shall receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. Use. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Any lawful purpose of Project Touch and for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development 5. Insurance Liability. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a combined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. Worker's Compensation Insurance. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and furnish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. Insurance Companies. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. Condition of the Premises Upon Termination of the Lease. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good condition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Lessee took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon demand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. Construction. Lessee is prohibited from making any alterations performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. Destruction, Partial Destruction or Necessity to Repair because of Conditions Caused by Other than Lessee. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the premises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction of repair if such reconstruction or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be terminated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. Hold Harmless. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any direct or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its officers, agents and employees arising out of the Lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all action, suits or other proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. Rules, Regulations and Ordinances. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Community Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. Taxes and Charges. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. Default. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pursuant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. Notice. Any notice required to be made or given pursuant to the provisions of this lease may be either personally served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Lessor: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 Lessee: PROJECT TOUCH 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Attn: Julie Feys Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. Attorneys Fees. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee may not sublease all or any portion of the premises without the written consent of the City, which consent may be granted or denied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. Successors. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 17. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this lease both parties reserve the right to terminate the lease at any time and without cause upon giving 30 days written notice to other party. In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first herein above set forth. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By Mayor CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: Executive Director Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 1, 1994 Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 CALTRANS BEFORE AND AFTER STUDY OF SOUTHBOUND PEAK HOUR CURB PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council receive, review and file said study and retain the existing curb parking restrictions. Background: In June 1991 Caltrans implemented a southbound, weekday PM peak period (3 PM to 7 PM) parking restriction on Pacific Coast Highway from Boundary Place to Anita-Herondo streets. This was done to provide a third southbound through lane. Caltrans and the Hermosa Beach City Council agreed that a before and after investigative report be provided after one year of operation. The investigation was to be an after study to determine the effectiveness of the project implemented in 1991, and to determine whether there are additional safety issues that may have emerged as a result of the project which now require additional action. Analysis• On September 30, 1994 the City received Caltrans before and after study. The two major goals the project was to achieve were: 1. 25% reduction in congestion related (rear -end and sideswipe) accidents on southbound SR -1 in Hermosa Beach, 3 PM to 7 PM, weekdays, and 2. 750 vehicles per hour in the PM peak hour carried in the #3 lane southbound SR -1 lane in Hermosa Beach. Between Boundary Place and 10th Street, these two goals appear to have been met. There has been over 40% reduction in congestion related accidents throughout both segments. Per -lane counts show that the additional third lane is capable of carrying well over 750 vehicles per hour. Travel times have decreased and there has been significant reduction in delay throughout these segments. Between 10th Street and Herondo Street the goal of 750 vehicles carried in the #3 southbound lane of SR -1 has not been fully met. Nevertheless, it does carry close to 700 vehicles per hours from 5 to 6 PM, which is 93% of the goal. However, congestion related accidents and all other types of accidents have increased. 1k Caltrans has recommended turn signing prohibitions and signal timing changes to reduce or eliminate this problem. The rate of congestion related accidents grew by 0.84 Acc./Million Vehicle Miles. Overall, the rate of congestion related accidents for the entire length of the project decreased by 17%. Although this reduction falls short of the expected reduction of 25% it was nevertheless an improvement. Overall, the project appears to have been effective as congestion related accident rates have been reduced. Delay, and capacity have improved and trip diversion through city streets appears to have been reduced. The City Public Works Staff has reviewed the report. In light of its accomplishments we believe that the goals have been responsibly addressed and met. Caltrans does appear willing to remediate the identified problems and to investigate future improvements along PCH to further ensure safety and efficiency. During the three year period since the implementation the City Public Works staff has not received any written complaints nor requests for reinstatement of the curb parking by the merchants along the affected area. A copy of the study is available at the City Clerk's office for review. Respectfully submitted, e:,- ?�, �- Edward_ J. uzak City Traffic Engineer ty/erstudy Concur: Amy A'nirani Director of Public Works Stephen Rle ell City IV A STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, 120 SO. SPRING ST. LOS ANGELES, CA 90012.3606 (213) 897-4653 September 30, 1994 7 -LA -1 20.6/22.2 PCH/Sepulveda Blvd. in Hermosa Beach Mr. Edward Ruzak City Traffic Engineer City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Ruzak: This is in response to your April 14, 1994 letter requesting clarification of the speed zone on Pacific Coast Highway: (1) Southbound immediately south of Artesia Boulevard; (2) northbound immediately north of 8th Street; (3) requesting replacement of a "NO LEFT OR U-TURN" sign for southbound PCH at 24th Place, and (4) requesting a "NO LEFT -TURN" sign for northbound PCH at 16th Street on the west side. Regarding the speed zone sign on PCH facing southbound traffic just south of Artesia Boulevard/Gould Avenue, this should be an R2(35) sign. Recently, Maintenance Branch replaced the panel which is the correct R2(35) format. The speed zone on northbound PCH between Herondo Street/ Anita Street and 14th Street is 30 miles -per -hour based upon the latest 1989 Speed Zone Survey. Speed limit signs were examined for conformity to this speed zone, and it was discovered that along northbound PCH just north of 8th Street - there exists and R2(35) sign where there should be an R2(30) sign. Maintenance Branch will be contacted to replace the incorrect speed limit sign with the correct R2(30) sign, and to post an R2(35) sign at the end of the 30mph-zone. Thank you for notifying us of the missing "NO LEFT OR U- TURN" sign on Pacific Coast Highway facing southbound traffic at 24th Place. We have notified our Maintenance Branch and they have replaced the missing sign. We have reviewed the time-limited left -turn prohibition signage facing northbound PCH at 16th Street. Recently, sign modifications were made by our maintenance forces at this F MR. EDWARD RUZAK September 30, 1994 Page 2 location. As part of these modifications, larger sign panels were to be installed for the northbound PCH time-limited left - turn prohibition on the northwest corner. A field review confirmed your report of the absence of any time-limited left - turn prohibition sign for northbound PCH on the northwest corner of PCH and 16th Street. We notified our Maintenance Branch of the situation and they have replace the missing signs. I am pleased to inform you that afterstudy on,afternoon peak period parking prohibition along southbound State Route 1 (SR - 1), in the City of Hermosa Beach has been completed. Copies of the afterstudy report is attached. Based upon the information gathered in the afterstudy, it appears that the parking regulation has successfully reduced delay and increased capacity along southbound SR -1 in the weekday afternoon peak period. A 17% reduction in the congestion related (rear end and sideswipe) accident rate was achieved by the project. Although this reduction falls short of the expected reduction of 25%, it is nevertheless an improvement. The reduction of trip diversion through city streets, which was one of the City's main goals for the project, appears to have been achieved. Significant increases in traffic volumes on SR - 1, particularly between 10th Street/Aviation Boulevard and Anita/Herondo Streets, suggests that during the evening peak period, much of the filter through traffic on nearby city streets, has returned to the State Highway. The only adverse effect of the project noted in the afterstudy was a rise in approach -turn accidents between 10th Street/Aviation Boulevard and Anita/Herondo Streets. High numbers of approach -turn accidents were noticed at 1st Street, 1st Place, 2nd Street, 3rd Street, 4th Street, 5th Street, 8th Street, and 8th Place. To reduce approach -turn accident potential at these locations, R34-2 (NO Left or U -Turn symbol) signs and R82A(MOD) 113PM-7PM MON-FRI" signs are being installed facing northbound traffic at the unsignalized intersections of PCH and 1st Place, 3rd Street, 4th Street, and 8th Place prohibiting northbound left and U-turn weekdays from 3PM - 7PM. A full time northbound left -turn prohibition currently exists at First Street. To maintain sign uniformity and improve safety at this intersection, the existing R17 (No Left -Turn symbol) sign on the east side of PCH facing northbound traffic will be replaced with an R34-2 (No Left or U -Turn symbol) sign. An additional R34-2 sign will be installed facing northbound traffic on the MR. EDWARD RUZAK September 30, 1994 Page 3 northwest corner of 1st Street and PCH to enhance clarity of the full time left and U -Turn prohibition. At the signalized intersections of 2nd Street, 5th Street, and 8th Street, the all red interval will be increased to allow northbound left turning vehicles more time to clear the intersection. More studies will be conducted to determine whether separate left -turn phasing is required at these signalized locations. If you have any questions regarding the afterstudy or any of the other issues addressed in this letter, please contact Mr. Karl F. Berger at (213) 897-0312. Sincerely, ORGE HALE Senior ransportation Engineer Office of Traffic Investigations Attachments: 1. 7 -TO -21 Rpt of Traffic Investigation Log No. D943 -111P 2. 7 -TO -21 Rpt of Traffic Investigation Log No. D943 -113P Date: 28 94 TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Group No. 4-1 Q Safety EA 910052 r DIST CO. ROUTE POST MILE LOG N0. Operational EA 910053 1 A IZl, 0i/7P-7 D943'/J3 Location PaClFie Coat Hg -fn +6 City of Hermosa Bch be4weevl 8+k- 5f, ow / 7+1, ST. X St. RECOMMENDATION APPROVED INITIATING SOURCE.- [ITabie C Other LI✓44Gr from EJ u?_Ok, C; OT H,GrImnr, l i)eae,! Traffic_ F ai>+teer. 14 Tot. Date: EXISTING CONDITIONS ❑ Rural [9Urban ❑ Suburban Highway Type 446 laYle. co,lveA► ional Speed Zone ,30 MPH ❑ Advisory hiahway WA ptied cAnri edizaboY1 Tangent ❑ Curves ACCIDENT SUMMARY . •CONDITIONS RECOMMENDATION ❑ Improvement Estimated Cost Safety Index COMMENTS: TRAFFIC DATA ADT 100C A ACC. RATE St. Hwy X St. RECOMMENDATION APPROVED Act Eao. qlmm F+1 14 Tot. ❑ No Corrective Action S ❑ Prior HT65 dated ❑ No apparent Rdw.y. Def. ❑ Impr. under design ❑ Acc. rate below expected EA ❑ Keep under surv. &,-v Qty P) i .1 RIVARIMMERMSE., V / I I � ♦ I/ • � I • 1 I ,■ � _I SII /. I1 • �. IJ IlRMINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII /i /I / N .r • . ► ! / r FIELD REVIEW: 0 No � III 1 I I I ■ / • ♦ / S 91yes. Bymamd(�,,-K.16' INVESTIGATOR DATE PROJECT ENGINEER DATE RECOMMENDATION APPROVED DATE qlmm 14 ACTON Date recommended improvement completed ❑ Other action taken (see attachment) 2 otZ Pe -N tAs+ nor4 of /4�ti 67- and +-ko� fair, R.ZC3S) east Sides of PCN 0f l6 �' �5T. be rcmavc-d oo ;,911✓ort!c 'fhes� sign► c�,an�ts are describ in At. c%4+pc�cd .5%5n/;'ns►�1%a Tort orders . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIGNANSTALLATION ORDER DAS-OSW323A (REV. 7/6151 Point of Use Shipment ❑ l Emergency 21 Day Delivery 47-03 0- 1.09 043-1131 DATE PREPARED PAGE l OF 3 MO. DAY YEAR o q zl9 Use Continuation Sheet DAS-OBM 3238 for More Space. SUF. COUNTY L A ROUTE 1 POST MILE Z1,o8//z�,47 1 FFY P DISTRICT IOUMFICATION PURCMABE ORDER NUMaEII T O ITEM QUANTITY I COOS 1 AW,5 SIZE 36 4 -S COLOR B W p LOCATION PCH (2 8+k f L. FN57 IN 7 -HE Cl -T-/1 -ft -w ON OF 1+e M05A BEACH BASE PANEL•PORCELAIN ALUMINUM 36" OVERLAY Cl SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE M SP E ED it SINGLE: SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUNO MOUNTED L— ThIWOR2 I M .}� LIMIT 145, A Q C3OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (A-Hw'dww* ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND - '35 BASE PANEL• ALUMINUM ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCB/RS ONLY1 (1= a e s REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ .043 ❑ .043 FRAMED ❑ ENCLOSED LENS ❑ .080 ❑ .080 FRAMED ❑ ENCAPSULATED LENS REMOVE FROM LOCATION COPY size COPTYPE 6)40 W N ON PA 6115 2 AE UNt UC LC CAP PLN R/d R/S I UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE I ITEM QUANTITY CODE 31ZE COLOR locAnON PC 8 h PL F T IN TH �-S H g ONY/ 6irY of H,,::RMOSA Bi:AG+ BASE PANELLPORCELAIN ALUMINUM 3 6� OVERLAY ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE SPEED SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED L— Th(eld LIMIT ❑ OVERHEAD E3 OV"(A- Mrdware) 45« �� ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND 1��� l � O BASE PANEL ALUMINUM ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCB/RS ONLY) REFLECTIVE SHEETING,. ❑ .083 ❑ .043 FRAMED ❑ ENCLOSED LENS ❑ .080 ❑ .080 FRAMED ❑ ENCAPSULATED LENS h5TALL @ LOCATION SHOWN COPY SIZE COPY TYPE ON PACT 2 - "RRWUNE UC I LC CAP DEGREE a" UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE PREP. BYCH KD. BY APPROVAL SIGNS INSTALLED MJC. I DISTRICT TRAFFIC ENGiN ER BY DATE DATE TO MAINT. PACKED 8Y-OATEI NO. d TYPE - PKG. WT. SHIP DATE • BY SHIPPED VIA WT. BILL • Use Continuation Sheet DAS-OBM 3238 for More Space. SUF. SOURCE I CMO. EXPENDITURE T.C. MOD, — 101ST. UNIT 013T. AUTHORIZATION SUBJoB SPECIAL DESIGNATION AGCY FAAMOUNT I Cal FFY ....N w.w.w ..w..N. Nw ..P ........ C I F'.,I C.ww C O ....... S T rr f • y� 4 • t_ »..w» .... ».w... . .......w .w...... •........ ...Nw» .......••................ wN».. APPRDX. /04' »w ... .w ......... ..N•... ..w.... w.w.w ... w... ...w..w .w.ww. ..•........................ .N..... ...... w.w.t .. ........ ........ 1 r - '�, -�RTi4 2 FNBr 7-0 3 ��� �� EX/ST JZ82/9 Mph FNBT 1 SPEED; LIMIT �s mitiy - AND sAGYA! E 3 FXlsr R2 C35") FNB% - - - - , AND 11 RZ (30 FNBr CONDITION AND I I.PROV ENT DIAGRAM T -LA -1 21.081 POCIfIC Coast " a Sth Piocs In Hermosa Beach I i NO SCALE I w` kil 1 I C . f• ....N w.w.w ..w..N. Nw ..P ........ C I F'.,I C.ww C O ....... S T rr f • y� 4 • t_ »..w» .... ».w... . .......w .w...... •........ ...Nw» .......••................ wN».. APPRDX. /04' »w ... .w ......... ..N•... ..w.... w.w.w ... w... ...w..w .w.ww. ..•........................ .N..... ...... w.w.t .. ........ ........ 1 r - '�, -�RTi4 2 FNBr 7-0 3 ��� �� EX/ST JZ82/9 Mph FNBT 1 SPEED; LIMIT �s mitiy - AND sAGYA! E 3 FXlsr R2 C35") FNB% - - - - , AND 11 RZ (30 FNBr CONDITION AND I I.PROV ENT DIAGRAM T -LA -1 21.081 POCIfIC Coast " a Sth Piocs In Hermosa Beach I i NO SCALE I w` kil 1 I C ....N w.w.w ..w..N. Nw ..P ........ C I F'.,I C.ww C O ....... S T rr f • y� 4 • t_ »..w» .... ».w... . .......w .w...... •........ ...Nw» .......••................ wN».. APPRDX. /04' »w ... .w ......... ..N•... ..w.... w.w.w ... w... ...w..w .w.ww. ..•........................ .N..... ...... w.w.t .. ........ ........ 1 r - '�, -�RTi4 2 FNBr 7-0 3 ��� �� EX/ST JZ82/9 Mph FNBT 1 SPEED; LIMIT �s mitiy - AND sAGYA! E 3 FXlsr R2 C35") FNB% - - - - , AND 11 RZ (30 FNBr CONDITION AND I I.PROV ENT DIAGRAM T -LA -1 21.081 POCIfIC Coast " a Sth Piocs In Hermosa Beach I i NO SCALE I w` kil �• O@'PARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION SIGN/INSTALLATION ORDER Continuation Sheet OAS-08M-32381REV. 7 361 ley tlyx 1) 7-13 -113 P DATE PgEPARED I PAGE ; OF MQ DAY YEAR 4 12qI Q4 1 31 -3 DISTRICT IDENTIFICATION r PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER COUNTY I ROUTE POST MILE LA I g /. qj101,47 1 ITEM i QUANTITY I CODE I SIZE COLOR (3$) I LOCATION EAST' S F /D6 OPCN /Q0' N. OF /4+,Tr I( % R2 l 3 6 wft 45-H a ON 1 IN -17ME Cir/ OF Hf�'MOsq Be-ACfl , F -N BT BASE PANEL:PORCELAIN ALUMINUM 36 OVERLAY ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE SPEED SINGLE: SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL SEf– Ar�IAM ( L " LIMIT 9S C3 GROUND MOUNTED 13 GROUND MOUNTEDI� mf(:v n►tn C OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (A- HardwaM ML.OW fOfZ 345 ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND SITE✓ LOcAT?CN I BASE PANEL: ALUMINUM 7 V OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCS/RS ONLY) j REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ .063 ❑ .083 FRAMED ❑ ENCLOSED LENS ❑ .080 0 48 FRAMED 7 rain, C.' ENCAPSULATED LENS I COPY SIZE COPY TYPE PCC ROA DwA % 5/OI Aq(JG UNE I UC , lC CAP 0ARROW REE PLN R/6 wa G.... I UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE ITEM QUANTITY i COOS SIZE COLOR LOCATION EAST SIDE oF. IPC /DO'N OF /4t jr I "v 'H oN /N i;• e G1TY OF AlgeAwQSA 864cH, ;`NBT - BASE PANEL:PORCELAIN ALUMINUM OVERLAY DIAGRAM I ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE — SINGLE. SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL NS-rALL R2 (3S) sIcIN f ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED(.__ TI11cio bm WOOp POST FN S'r I ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (A- HaM*w* /90' Al OF 57' ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND b fJ0 SCALE N. CuRB�/NE__ I BABE PANEL:ALUMINUM C JPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCB/RS ONLY) REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ .063 ❑ .063 FRAMED SEE Af30VE I ❑ ENCLOSED LENS Cl .080 ❑ .080 FRAMED DIAMAM ❑ ENCAPSULATED LENS EOR 514N PIeR AVE. /gr",5r. I COPY SIZE COPY TYPEARROW FORMAT f F I j UNE UC LC CAP DEGREE PL" Res Res I I I UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE iITEM QUANTITY .7i CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATIONEASI SIDE OF PCN 60' A), of / th 67- 7 2,(3S� I 14wvI� 3a -� a ON w IA% T1/E CITY OF NER/VG�A SeACK I:N87" BASE PANEL•PORCELAIN ALUMINUM f)IAGRI'•►� Z I OVERLAY f4 �� ,57' . SINGLE SHEET SLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE i SINGLa SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL -REM0V ANp SALVA6,P No SG4LE C GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED L-- Thlelo F -XI ST R 2(3,5-) .Sf b !J 'V C OVERHEAD Cl OVERHEAD(A• Hardware) FNBT- AND WGOD Powr 0' O REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUNO AWRCK cb0' M OF AS -0 BASE PANEL ALUMINUM dr N. CA�RLS(/NE, f ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCS/RS ONLY) 60/ I REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ .063 ❑ .063 FRAMED ❑ ENCLOSED LENS ❑ .080 ❑ .080 FRAMEDI ,6'h OT. I ❑ ENCAPSULATED LENS L �a /h 45r COPY SIZE COPY TYPE UNE i UC LC , UP DE7REE ILN I Rie R/8 I UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE i - APR 21 1994 April 14, 1994 Mr. George Chale Senior Transportation Engineer Caltrans, District 7 120 South Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Citi o f2iermosarl3eaclt� Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 Subject: Pacific Coast Highway; Signs and Speed Posting Attention: Mr. Karl F. Berger � Dear . hale4-Berge Our police field representatives have brought to our attention some problems related to the subject issues on PCH. the following reflect their and our concerns./ 1. On PCH immediately south of Artesia blvd. -for -southbound traffic your 7 �Y i forces recently placed a new "40 mph" speed limit sign. Our recent certified speed survey report reflects a 35 mph limit.ty �U This latter limit is what is reflected in your May 4, 1989 letter to our City , V t `a manager, copy attached. We need rification as soon as possible on this "'t matter because the current signs ar in violation of our survey plus your own survey which is within five years of a nee ion.. 2. A similar situation exists for northbound traffic immediately north of 8th t� 9 street. The new limit 35 the May 4, 1989 V is mph while letter shows that it should be 35 mph between Herondo street and 14th street. - - K am speculating that your forces updated the five year survey to meet the 7 engineering and traffic survey requirements and that you wish to change the limits. We need to know this so we can modify our certified survey. Our survey update was completed .several-- months ago. Please inform us of the current sch iation as soon as possible. 3. On the PCH center divider at 24th Place there used to be a "No Left Or U -Turn" sign for southbound traffic. When the sign got knocked down and later , replaced the "No Left Or U -Turn" sign was not put back. The only sign put back up was a no left turn 3-7 p.m. for northbound traffic. we request the sign for "No Left Or U -Turn" for southbound traffic be put back. There is no left turn pocket at the location and traffic south from Artesia is heavy. We have received numerous complaints from citizens requesting the sign be put back. T\ 4. There is only one sign stating "No Left Turn" at 16th and PCH for northbound traffic. the other two signs were removed and the installed on the east side just south of 16th street. We requ6st a secondsg�n-bb placed on the west side of PCH on either thes .uth-comer or the north comer. Uh The biggest complaint from citizens is that th did not see=the one sign when U� they turned left. In conclusion I must again bring up an unpleasant subject. It has been almost �two years since the City of Hermosa Beach was to receive your report on the operation and accident conditions on PCH in the section where peak hour —, prohibitions were placed. We have yet to see a report that was promised to us in writing on several occasions about one year ago. Will you please tell us what the status of this report is? Sincerely, xW e I Edward Ruzak City traffic Engineer cc: Amy Amirani, Director of Public Works Tom Thompson, Police Department tyerchal (213) 620-3304 !has' 4, 19i35 7 -LA -1 20.62/22.16 PCH in Hermosa Beach Speed Zone Survey Mr. Kevin B. Northcraft City manager City or Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Ar. Northeraft: An Engineering and Traffic Survey on Pacific Coast Highway (and Sepulveda Boulevard), State Route 1, within the city limits of the City of Hermosa Beach was recently completed. The existing speed limits were reviewed in terms of adjacent land use, roadway geometries, traffic volumes and motorists' driving behavior. The primary goal of the study was to establish a realistic and safe speed limit on Pacific Coast Highway, and to satisfy California Vehicle Code (Section 627) requirements for proper posting of speed limits. It is recommended that the existing posted speed limits on Pacific Coast Highway, between Anita Street/Herondo Street and Pico Avenue/ 14th Street, and between Pier Avenue/14th Street and Longfellow- Avenue, ongfellowAvenue, be retained at 30 miles per hour and 35 miles per hourp respectively. Initially, examination of the 85th percentile speeds on PCH seemed to indicate a need to increase posted speed limits by 5 jV.p.h. in these two reaches of Route 1. However, land use along Route 1 has intensified and become more commercial. This has been accompanied by increased pedestrian traffic crossing Route 1, and in increased vehicular traffic crossing, entering and exiting Route 1 via intersecting city streets and driveways. The resulting increase in potential for vehicular conflict, and in potential for vehicle/pedestrian conflict, dictates that such change in posted spee3 limits would not be in the interest of safety. Ae believe that this recommendation, to retain the atinq posted speer ii,nits on Route 1 in bermoaa Beach, will facilate the sane an:: orderly moveiaent of traffic, and will require onlylsoderate _ . x`%avii. c. c to rar t ii YOU Ccncur wit: this recommendaticn, please provide us with a c' tze iier.r:osa Beach City Council's resolution for approval zr. ; aao.tiot, Gf tr,e speed limits on Route 1 (Pacific Coast Highway and Sepulveda Boulevard). Upon receipt of said resolution, we will taen a :,rove it, and return it to you. lr ycu require any additional information, please contact Mr. Karl F. Berger at (213) 520-3829. Y. bincert�y, Senior I•ransportation Engineer •Traiiic Operations Branch At tacnzient KFB:ct bcc: ZMichiel - ti APRIL 1989 TABLE A ROUTE 1 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY/SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD ANITA/HERONDO STREET TO LONGFELLOW AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH I LOCATION ROADWAY ADT ACCIDENT RATE POSTED SPEED PACE SPEED 85TH PERCENTIL RECOM SPEED WIDTH NO. OF ROUTE 1 FT. LANES VPD ACC/MVM / MPH MPH MPH MPH HERONDO ST. -14TH ST. 74 4 54,500 2.67 30 24-34 34 30 14TH ST.-LONGFELLOW 74 4 46,300- 2.50 35 31-41 40 35 AVENUE I sTRAFFIC INVESTIGATION Group No. ate: T* 1 ❑ 'Safety EA 910052 Operationai EA 910053 DIST CO. ROUTE POST MILE LOG NO. 7 Act En. Date recommended improvement completed Speed one Tangent ACCIDENT SUMMARY .40 OF ACCIDENTS PERSONS CONDITIONS rear j 'at. Fat. In►. PDO K,"i^ Inj SV MV LT DK WET .9 ACTION �� Act En. Date recommended improvement completed F+I Tota! j R'c;,GM' ENDATION L, mprovement Estimated Cost Safety Index COMMENTS: 344-0 AA P H ❑ Curves ❑ Suburban ❑ Advisory TRAFFIC DATA ADT 100C A AC C. RATE St Mwy X St. ACTION �� Act En. Date recommended improvement completed F+I 7—T0,— _1 Tot. 2/-M Re'V ❑ No Corrective Action $ T O Prior HT65 dated O No apparent Rdwy. Def. O Impr. under design O Acc. rate below expected /j EA O Keep under surv. ��,,,� ���cs✓T/, FIELD REVIEW: ❑ No Yes. B Date? ►NVESTIGATOR I DATE 1 PROJECT ENGINEER I DATE APPROVED I DATE ACTION �� � 9 z� Date recommended improvement completed ❑ Other action taken (see attachment) 7—T0,— _1 _ 2/-M Re'V APPROVED I DATE 2 LNTRODUCTION In June, 1991, southbound weekday P.M. peak period parking regulation was implemented on SR -1 (Pacific Coast Hwy. and Sepulveda Blvd.) through the City of Hermosa Beach, from Boundary Place at the north end to Anita St.-Herondo St. just south of the south city limit. This was done to provide a third southbound through lane. This investigation is an after -study to determine the effectiveness of the project implemented in 1991, and to determine whether there are additional safety issues that may have emerged as a result of the project which now require additional action. EXISTING CONDITIONS (OR CHANGED CONDITIONS OF HIGHWAY) As of June 3, 1991, a Tow -Away -No -Stopping 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday zone was implemented for SB SR -1 in the City of Hermosa Beach from Boundary Pl. to Herondo St. (P.M. 20.621 to 22.201). Before the parking regulation, SR -1 operated as a 4 lane highway during the p.m. peak with two northbound and two southbound lanes. The parking prohibition eliminated parking along the west side of SR -1 in order to provide an additional third lane for southbound traffic during the p.m. peak period. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS In order to more thoroughly analyze safety and traffic conditions within the 1.58 mi. stretch of SR -1 covered by the project, the highway was divided into three smaller segments. The areas covered by the individual segments are as follows: Segment 1 - Boundary Pl. to Gould Ave. Segment 2 - Gould Ave./Artesia Blvd. to 10th St./Aviation Blvd. Segment 3 - 10th St./Aviation Blvd. to Anita, Herondo St. Accident history analysis coveriniz a 13/4 vear veriod from 7-1-91 to 3-31-93 were performed on each of the three segments.) The analysis identified all weekday p.m. peak period accidents on southbound SR -1 and categorized them as either congestion related accidents (sideswipes and rear ends) or all other types of accidents. These accidents were then used to determine the weekday p.m. peak period accident rates. The accident rates were determined with the following formula: sof accidents x10A Accident Rate = (iength of segment, mi.)i study Period, y[s.)(Ave. traffic vol, during p.m. peak period veWday)(260wkda") ( In the following discussion, unless otherwise stated, the word "accidents" will refer to only those reported accidents that occurred during the weekday p.m. peak period, 3-7 p.m., on SB SR -1. Similarly, the term "accident rate" will refer to the accident rate calculated by the above formula for reported accidents that occurred during the weekday p.m. peak period, 3-7p.m. on SB SR -1.) G 3 The project's overall effect on safety was determined by comparing before and after accident rates for each segment of the highway. Traffic conditions on SR -I in Hermosa Beach prior to the parking regulation were discussed in the 1991 TO -21 report: Group No. T-24, Log No. C911-1040. The before figures used in the following comparisons have been taken from that report. Comparison of before and after conditions on segment 1, Boundary Pl. to Gould Ave., revealed that the overall accident rate fell from 7.52 Acc./MVM to 5.05 Acc./MVM. (See Attachment No. 1) This reduction of 2.47 Acc./MVM is an improvement. Congestion related accident rates declined by 40%, dropping from 4.34 Acc./MVM to 2.62 ACC./MVM. The accident rate of all other accidents decreased by 0.66 Acc./MVM. Segment 2, Gould Ave. to 10th St., showed similar improvements in safety as the overall accident rate fell from 7.28 Acc..iVfVlVI to 2.56 Acc./MVM. This change represents an improvement of 64%%. The congestion related accident rate also showed improvement as it declined by 1.25 Acc./MVM, a change of 44%. The accident rate of all other accidents decreased as well, falling by 3.48 Acc./MVM. However, unlike segments 1 and 2, segment 3, from 10th St. to Herondo St., showed a rise in the overall accident rate, which increased from 7.09 Acc./MVM to 10.16 Acc./MVM. The overall accident rate along this segment increased by 3.07 Acc./h4VM. Similarly, the accident rate for congestion related accidents and all other types of accidents rose by 0.84 ACC./MVM and 13.61 Acc./MVM respectively. (See Attachment No. 1) ( Reminder: In this discussion, unless otherwise stated, the word "accidents" and "accident rate" refers to only those reported accidents that occurred during the weekday p.m. peak period, 3-7 p.m., on SB SR -1 or accident rates calculated based on those accidents.) To better ut:derstand the sudden increased incidence of accidents in the weekday p.m. peak period within this particular segment, a collision diagram was prepared identifying all SB weekday accidents that occurred between 3p.m. and 7p.m. on SR -I from 7-1-91 to 3-31-93. (See Attachment No. 2) The collision diagram revealed high concentrations of approach turn accidents (NB left turn and S/B straight) at the intersections of: 1 st St., 1 st Pl., 2nd St., 4th St., 5th St., 8th St., 8th Pl., and 9th St. At fault in almost all of these approach -tum accidents were N/B left turning drivers who failed to yield the right of way to the SB through vehicles. Approach -turn accidents accounted for 45 of the 47 non -congestion related accidents reported between 10th St. and Herondo St. Within this particular segment, 79% of all the accidents that occurred during the 13/4 year study period were approach turn accidents. There were also 10 congestion related accidents identified in the collision diagram. Of the 10 accidents, 4 involved drivers who were following too close the car in front of them, 2 were caused by improper lane change, and 4 were due to excessive speed. One factor that may be contributing to the rise in accident rates throughout this segment of SR -1 is increased speeds. (See Attachment No. 3) During the congested PM peak, drivers tend to follow too closely the car in front of them. When speeds rise but separation between cars are not proportionately_ increased to account for increased stopping distance that is required, the chances of an accident occurring increases. M 4 Another factor that may be contributing to the rise in accidents along segment 3 is the increase in traffic volumes. (See Attachment No.4) Although traffic volumes have increased in all three segments, the greatest increase occurred between 10th St. and Herondo St. Over 1,000 more vehicles are traveling SB through this segment during the PM peak hour. Volumes along this segment have increased by as much as 65.1%. With more traffic flowing though the area, the likelihood of accidents occurring are higher. The increased traffic in this area appears to be the result of filter through traffic on city streets returning back onto the highway, which marks the achievement of one of the goals of the project. Increased volume and speed, along with poor driver judgement may be the contributing factors in the high number of approach turn accidents. Closer examination of these accidents revealed that 42 of the 45 approach turn accidents involved NB left turning vehicles and SB through vehicles traveling in the #3 lane. Accidents of this nature can be partially explained by the partial obstruction of northbound left turning driver's line of sight to vehicles in the SB 93 lane. During periods of high congestion, stopped vehicles in the SB # 1 and 2 lanes prevent drivers in the NB left turn lane and SB #3 lane from seeing one another until it's too late. In many of these approach -tum accidents, it was reported that during stop and go conditions, drivers in the # 1 and 2 lanes stopped to allow the NB left turning vehicle room to turn. The left turning driver assumed that traffic had stopped for him and that it was safe to rum. The drivers involved in these approach -turn accidents often reported never seeing the vehicle in the #3 lane until it was too late. Also, the additional S.B #3 lane may be traveling at higher speeds than the #I and 2 lanes. Southbound drivers in the #3 lane who were involved in the collision with northbound left -turners were frequently cited for excessive speed for conditions. Higher speeds coupled with reduced visibility in the S:B #3 and NB left turn lanes appear to be the major contributing factors in the high rates of occurrence of approach turn accidents along this segment. Poor driver judgement may be another factor that is contributing to the rise in approach - turn accidents. Drivers in the Northbound lef'► turn lane may have misjudged the gaps in SB traffic. They begin their turn when they thought that there was a safe gap in the oncoming traffic. But, when they realized that they had misjudged the gap, it was too late for them to abort their move. They continued with their turn, managing to clear the # 1 and 2 lanes, however, they do not clear the #3 lane in time. It is apparent that if these approach turn accidents are reduced or eliminated in this segment of SR -1, the rate of occurrence of all accidents would significantly decrease. This improvement in safety can be accomplished by prohibiting Northbound left turn and U-turns on weekdays from 3p.m. to 7p.m. at the unsignalized intersections of 1st St., 1st Pl., 3rd St., 4th St., and 8th Pl. At the signalized intersections of 2nd St., 5th St., and 8th St., the all red interval should be increased to provide Northbound left turning vehicles more time to clear the intersection. This is an interim solution to a determination of whether separate left turn phasing is needed on SR -1 at these signalized locations. Since both segments 1 and 2 have shown positive improvements in safety as a result of the parking regulation, no further action is required from Boundary Pl. to 10th St. TRAFFIC DATA ANALYSIS Segment 1: Boundary Pl. to Gould Ave. Southbound traffic volumes along this segment of SR -1 have increased since the W installation of the parking regulation. (See Attachment No.4) Before the parking regulation 2,190 vehicles traveled through this portion during the busiest hour from 4p.m.to 5p.m. After the parking regulation was implemented, the S/B traffic volume along this segment increased by 17.5% within this hour. Nearly 400 more cars are traveling through this segment from 4-5p.m.. Before the parking regulation, the highest V/C ratio for balanced operation in this segment was 1.37. After the parking regulation, it had improved to 1.07. Similarly, the V/C ratio for State Hwy preferred operation improved from 1.10 to 0.85 after implementation of the parking regulation. The additional lane had improved the LOS from F to D. (See Attachment No. 5) Segment 2: Gould Ave to 10th St. Traffic volumes have also increased along this segment during the p.m. peak period as a result of the parking regulation. During the heaviest flow, from 4p.m. to 5p.m., traffic volumes have increased by 21.6%, growing from 2,122 vehicles to 2,581 vehicles. Lane by lane breakdown of this total hourly volume revealed that existing lanes #I and #2 carried 865 and 960 vehicles respectively. (See Attachment No. 4) The additional #3 lane carried 726 vehicles which comes very close to the expected goal for this lane of 750 veh/hr. Prior to the parking regulation, the balanced operation V/C ratio for this segment was 1.33. After the parking regulation, it had improved to 1.08. (See Attachment No. 5) The State Hwy. preferred operation V/C ratio also showed similar improvements as it dropped from 1.06 to 0.86. The additional lane had improved the LOS from F to D. Segment 3: 10th St. to Herondo St. Capacity along this segment has increased significantly. Traffic volumes from 5p.m. to 6p.m. have increased by 51.6%. Over 1,000 more vehicles are driving through this segment during the highest hour. Individual lane counts revealed that lanes #1, #2, and #3 carry 1,232; 1,102. and 697 vehicles respectively during the hour between 5p.m. and 6p.m. (See Attachment No.4) The 697 veh/hr carried by lane #3 comes close to the goal of 750 veh'hr. for this additional lane. The V/C ratios had improved for the first two hours of the p.m. peak period, 3p.m. to 5p.m. However, the V/C ratio for the final two hours of the PM peak period showed slight increases. After implementation of the parking regulation, the V/C: ratio for State Hwy preferred operation increased from 1.00 to 1.01 for the hour between 5p.m. and 6p.m. and 0.80 to 0.88 for the hour between 6p.m. and 7p.m. Similarly, for balanced operation, the V./C ratio increased from 1.25 to 1.26 for the 5p.m. hour and 1.00 to 1.10 for the 6p.m. hour. (See Attachment No. 5) This increase is the result of the large growth in traffic along this segment. It appears that the additional capacity along the highway has attracted filter through traffic away from city streets back onto the state highway. Traffic volumes had increased by over 50% for the hours in which the V/C ratio increased. Any improvement made in the LOS for those hours were offset by the large rise in traffic through this segment. Although the LOS had not improve as expected, it is an acceptable trade-off for the reduction of trip diversion through city streets. The travel time/speed study, conducted on July 13, 1994 revealed that average travel times along the entire length of the project have decreased for the p.m. peak period. (See Attachment R No. 3.) The additional third lane provided by the parking regulation has significantly reduced delay times. Before the parking regulation the average delay time was between 2.44 and 3.91 minutes. Now it is between 0.28 and 1.95 minutes. The maximum delay experienced during the evening peak generally occurs between 6p.m. and 7p.m. Before the parking regulation the average travel time from Longfellow Ave. just south of Boundary Pl. to Herondo St. during this hour was 7.61 minutes. Today, the average travel time along the same segment is only 5.65 minutes. The additional southbound lane provided by the parking regulation has successfully met the goal of reducing travel times and delay on SR -1 in Hermosa Beach. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The two major goals of the project was to achieve: l.) 25% reduction in congestion related (rear -end and sideswipe) accidents on southbound SR -1 in Hermosa Beach, 3p.m. to 7p.m., weekdays, and 2.) 750 vehicles per hour in the p.m. peak hour carried in the #3 lane of southbound SR -1 in Hermosa Beach. Along segments 1 and 2, from Boundary Pl. to 10th St. these two goals appear to have been met. There has been over 40% reduction in congestion related accidents throughout both segments. Per -lane counts show that the additional third lane is capable of carrying well over 750 vehicles per hour. Travel times have decreased and there has been significant reduction in delay throughout these segmeats. Since the goals of the project have been met and there appears to be no other adverse effects caused by the project, no further action is recommended for segments 1 and 2. Along segment 3, the goal of 750 vehicles carried in the #3 southbound lane of SR -1 has not been fiilly met. Nevertheless, it does carry close to 700 vehicles per hoar from 5 to 6p.m., which is 93% of the goal. However, congestion related accidents and all other types of accidents have increased. Approach turn accidents account for 96% of the non -congestion related accidents. To reduce the potential for approach turn accidents, R34-2 and R82A (MOD) signs will be installed facing northbound traffic (FNBT) at the unsignalized intersections of 1st Pl., 3rd St., and 4th St. prohibiting left and U-turns from 3p.m.-7p.m. (See attached Installation Orders) At 1st St. there already exists a full time left tarn prohibition, but because the width of the highway does not provide sufficient room for U-turns, the existing R-17 sign on the east side of SR -1 will be replaced by an R34-2 sign to prohibit both left and U-turns. Replacing the R-17 with the R34-2 sign would also maintain signing uniformity and improve the ease of enforcement along the highway. An additional R34-2 sign will be installed on the NAV corner of 1st St. to further alert northbound left turning drivers of the left and U-turn prohibition. High numbers of approach turn accident at 8th Pl. were identified in a 2nd Quarter 1992 Table C Log No. C924 -101A. R-17 and R82A(MOD) signs were installed FNBT at the intersection to prohibit left turns from 3p.m. to 7p.m. Monday through Friday. It is recommended that the existing R-17 signs be replaced with an R34-2 sign to include a U-turn prohibition since the width of the highway at this intersection is too 7 narrow for U-turns. Replacing the R17 signs with R34-2 signs would also maintain signing uniformity and increase the ease of enforcement along this segment of the highway. At 9th St., R34-2 and R82A(MOD) (no left and U-turn from 6a.m.-9a.m. and 3p.m.-7p.m.) signs were installed FNBT on the center island on the north end of the intersection. The sign vms installed in 1992 and since then, there has only been one approach -turn accident at that location. therefore no further action is recommended at 91h St. At the signalized intersection of 2nd St., 5th St., and 8th St., it is recommended that the signal times be changed to increase the all red interval as an interim improvement. Signal times should be changed instead of prohibiting left turns at these intersections so that access to the west side of SR -1 can be maintained for northbound traffic. The rise in congestion related accidents along this segment appears to have been a product of increased traffic volumes and speeds. The rate of congestion related accidents grew by 0.84 ACC./MVM. Overall, the rate of congestion related accidents for the entire length of the project decreased br 17%.. Although this reduction falls short of the expected reduction of 25%, it was nevertheless an improvement. Overall, the project appears to have been effective as congestion related accident rates have been reduced. Delay. and capacity have improved and trip diversion through city streets appears to have been reduced. It is also recommended that the intersections of PCH at 2nd St., 5th St., and 8th St., be investigated to determine whether separate left turn phasing on PCH is currently needed. 07 -LA -1 P.M. 20.621-22.201 SR -1 in Hermosa Beach Parking Regulation Afterstudy M. Kodsuntie 6/24/94 Southbound Weekday Accident Rates During Peak PM Period, 3PM-7PM* Location Total Con estion Related All Other Before After I Chane Before After Chane Before After Change Boundary PI. to 7.52 5.05 -2.47 4.34 2.62 -1.72 3.18 2.62 -0.56 Gould Ave. Gould Ave. to 7.28 2.56 -4.72 2.85 1.60 -1.25 4.44 0.96 -3.48 10th St. 10th St. to 6.70 21.15 +14.45 2.87 3.71 +0.84 3.83 17.44 +13.61 Herondo St. Overall Lenght of Project Boundary PI. 7.09 10.16 +3.07 3.11 2.58 -0.53 3.97 7.58 +3.61 to Herondo St. *Acc/MVM Acc. Rate= Qof accidents)(10'6 ) (#yrs)(ave. perk period traffic volume)(segment Ion gth)(260weekdays/yr) *Weekday accidents only, 3:00p.m. - 7:00p.m. Z 0 = v PMPeak Peri ad I All Types "' o„ R�� l �w.3rr,pry c,Thbn ge_l0� =,W BoUyi�ary To 14rr-OrI,80 (1.580 '»ti i All TyPcs = 71 RE } LK or EZ+e �B Con9t5�i or, �Ze1a _ Se pul vPaa Blvd. ' Do /F/eepewGy ./ Ou...•....� makd y rtiZ/eOdl c ?'i1 /9c.1e B1,pp�.o1du,nnd1n /0.rr!y -Qftlrlr O G/orsulg A VL J -Y-43 / yr3 0.281 w rS Ic !S 2-31 1 1 1 t-4 I I I I I I I I I I!! I I I I t I I I -H1 I I 1 I A4 -SI I I i l l i l S L 1 I l l l l l l l l 1-71 7 e I I I I I I I I I Mla'11 -IDI 1! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mv/ I1 ll•/! I1 I I I I I I I I I I =� '' 1 1 I I 2,3 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 l l I I I I I I 374-1. I I } $I 1 1 1 I l l l l l l I I l 1 1 l l l l l l l 1 s-cI , I I I I I_ I I I� /I •)•1 •i�TT'I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I! I I I I I I I I I I LHs1 • I V I I I I I I I! I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I /y ar i� •f f/cerdcnr2 (/mere �.✓re/ %rtn o�.YS 1-vw. ✓,,r. 3- cove /Vr/•, �KfC/C� 6./..e./Gw.rr»+StNw A" SdSo c.aW 17.JVT7s C - 1{c -L -+r f-3 VAC I L O! I V/C ILLS I Y/G I LOS I V/C 1Medne&oav `S 91 Ca LDro>e�iar/ A✓C t r.rrsmy ! B.xd a, &Wnir projcdcd o..r I All Tes - 8 PE ev Co"e iiom;.6a+ed (7- LA -1) _ :•(/eekve�• rsec.dnrSr-A// Timet S Bn& PC' "o Av,, ;,10115f 7 -LA -1 ZL 18) -2L 711 749/ Inru " 0.7J8,nL �,., �, IlriollsD/(rCFiS,� [] A// Ofi,v TPo I N,i.r.OJ M la_/ 2 3 l i l l I-1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 4 -SI S•GI 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1! 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-71• I I I I_�_i � I I I 1 1 1 1 1!, I I I I I I I I 7-eV.1•I !�I ! 1 1 ( I I I I!! I I I I I I I I I N ESI I I I I 1 1 1 1 1! I l l l l l t l l l l �D •Ilf-1-' I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RL H i l l I I l i I I I I I I I I I I I I 'N�mpc� �f i4Cc•dent,S G •rafrne/itne�ir= �Goru ✓t. 3 Lcr_ c$s/onCGd rt. ► Ji I SdSo cuss cr.s: =rnao 11 IV/c ILL='We II S�v/G I Thur0.o2r S-ZI.OL `R 110 SF t vJcdnad0.y ;'20 42 C' Z•-* 3t t $aced on 30w:n. ewn� projeeit� ovc r ! N. C00S4 Q ..e�rwe/%tnoA �Lerr. ✓l. - ["awe Ey/enced rt. -!'lf� f.(.wee/Ow.r w -5h SdSo c-av crs/ns C ==j , Thun00.y 5 -11 -IL a ZI If 51- t Wcdnoday 5-6-11 a 12S• N/a T --it All Types = S7 t REQ 55 on R+e I = /o j keloiGo sIS TirgC st% Qoyr �r/ro✓tncv .>F Occ�rientr Jf/ccko%r i.Gci dnrf - fi// Tji-s 11 Bnd PCH, Ando St +o Aviation Byrd 7 -LA -1 20.1:1t'11.JSf 7-1- V 1hru 3 9!-43 1=4 rrs 0.560 E) A// Ofly TyPd i :.�c er rJolr �rris.r�ncl. .% Oceli/icwca do/iS- TACHMENT No.7D i[/cckve.• i+cc: �•frs H Bn-, Pa hvia7lon G1 To Al4�n B!. 7 ( 1.1311-11419 5 End, PCH 1011 Si. 4. Hero.sdo 5f. 7 -LA -1=11M 7-1- 1 Tiru 3 } °3 /isY rs 0.738mi. OPERATIONAL Q G-••• =• P.s/e�ed(rCF/Ss) Q 4110/,;- i yP- ft,e/enCGd rt. -rf rC ✓' PKC/" iv�.n Oer r or /S � lG dcwrl 1S IN THE CITY Cr L� V I I I I I I 1 1 1 SdJO c-Etb r-J/ns c./me 12 t 1 vic 1 les l vic , res l vrc l cot lVic lc i I 1 07 _LA- I 2C. �21-22-201 . � I_ I I I I I ���_ 4•SI i l l i 1 1! I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I A 5-11 1 1 1 I I I -G, 1-1 1 1 1 1! y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 I I I I 11 1 I r 11.03 I- L- I I 1 1 1I 1I 1! 1 1! ! 1II '5051II 1.,411II III 1lI I3-«1-,_, P!+ " 1 1 ! ! 5-c _ MI !•1.11 II I! I' i l l l l re 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I l I: l l l l -Il �LE- F 7r7 . 1I •- I Accrdenr-S I I1 9h•--ett9o IP7 I I _ 1,5(a•+.'n3i L 'i Q n rr /-LI CiTi C All Tes - 8 PE ev Co"e iiom;.6a+ed (7- LA -1) _ :•(/eekve�• rsec.dnrSr-A// Timet S Bn& PC' "o Av,, ;,10115f 7 -LA -1 ZL 18) -2L 711 749/ Inru " 0.7J8,nL �,., �, IlriollsD/(rCFiS,� [] A// Ofi,v TPo I N,i.r.OJ M la_/ 2 3 l i l l I-1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 4 -SI S•GI 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1! 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-71• I I I I_�_i � I I I 1 1 1 1 1!, I I I I I I I I 7-eV.1•I !�I ! 1 1 ( I I I I!! I I I I I I I I I N ESI I I I I 1 1 1 1 1! I l l l l l t l l l l �D •Ilf-1-' I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RL H i l l I I l i I I I I I I I I I I I I 'N�mpc� �f i4Cc•dent,S G •rafrne/itne�ir= �Goru ✓t. 3 Lcr_ c$s/onCGd rt. ► Ji I SdSo cuss cr.s: =rnao 11 IV/c ILL='We II S�v/G I Thur0.o2r S-ZI.OL `R 110 SF t vJcdnad0.y ;'20 42 C' Z•-* 3t t $aced on 30w:n. ewn� projeeit� ovc r ! N. C00S4 Q ..e�rwe/%tnoA �Lerr. ✓l. - ["awe Ey/enced rt. -!'lf� f.(.wee/Ow.r w -5h SdSo c-av crs/ns C ==j , Thun00.y 5 -11 -IL a ZI If 51- t Wcdnoday 5-6-11 a 12S• N/a T --it All Types = S7 t REQ 55 on R+e I = /o j keloiGo sIS TirgC st% Qoyr �r/ro✓tncv .>F Occ�rientr Jf/ccko%r i.Gci dnrf - fi// Tji-s 11 Bnd PCH, Ando St +o Aviation Byrd 7 -LA -1 20.1:1t'11.JSf 7-1- V 1hru 3 9!-43 1=4 rrs 0.560 E) A// Ofly TyPd - ' n/.r rsoper f Acu dcn rS t 7.1ur�aar 5-7•YLe A•lafrw+ ! wcr,�eaG0.y S•i•41 a AVI�tIOt - � �".tea .,,, ,ip rn.n. Gouni wolected Duet 1 N. Hig kwo; T:.nc .yl^ Qn)r �r�ie.roncy .f Otc�/isw� A TACHMENT No.7D 2 0F2 5 End, PCH 1011 Si. 4. Hero.sdo 5f. 7 -LA -1=11M SAFETY OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ft,e/enCGd rt. -rf rC ✓' PKC/" RTE 1 IN THE CITY Cr HERMOSA SdJO c-Etb r-J/ns c./me 12 t 1 vic 1 les l vic , res l vrc l cot lVic lc i I 1 07 _LA- I 2C. �21-22-201 . � a•SI I I I i - ' n/.r rsoper f Acu dcn rS t 7.1ur�aar 5-7•YLe A•lafrw+ ! wcr,�eaG0.y S•i•41 a AVI�tIOt - � �".tea .,,, ,ip rn.n. Gouni wolected Duet 1 N. Hig kwo; T:.nc .yl^ Qn)r �r�ie.roncy .f Otc�/isw� K/eeka/e'. A. c,' - 5 End, PCH 1011 Si. 4. Hero.sdo 5f. 7 -LA -1=11M 2.31- v /7-l1 I I I I �-- r+l •�11 a•SI I I I i I I ���_ 4•S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I I I I( I I! I I I 1 I!! I! $I;�I�••�•I -G, 1-1 1 1 1 1! y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 t_ 7E2131�( 11.03 I- �_ I Q 1 1 1I 1I 1! 1 1! ! 1II '5051II 1.,411II III 1lI I _ MI !•1.11 II I! ! I �LE- F -i1 •II . 4I •I11 .11 •{1 •11f . 1I •- I I I1 9h•--ett9o IP7 I I _ 1,5(a•+.'n3i I 'i ff11.1•I I I. 1 I I I! I I I I I I I � I I I I 1 I i( I I /-LI 123 I I 11231 ! ji-* .,. 1.1 •.-1. ,. .1.1.,.1.1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. 1 I I I , I I I I 1 I I! i LLI I �_ r 2.31 2.3 77-1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 I l i2-31 3•�1 • 1 I I I I I I I!! I I I i l l t 1, 3-a'1 1 7 4•SI I I I I l r l 0. 7 .1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1! I l l l I I! G -T [ Ye I I ! 1 1 1 : I I i 1 I I I /c-/!� I ! I !•I.I • I I l l i l i l l l i l I /N: - •{•( 777-1 I - ' n/.r rsoper f Acu dcn rS t 7.1ur�aar 5-7•YLe A•lafrw+ ! wcr,�eaG0.y S•i•41 a AVI�tIOt - � �".tea .,,, ,ip rn.n. Gouni wolected Duet 1 N. Hig kwo; T:.nc .yl^ Qn)r �r�ie.roncy .f Otc�/isw� K/eeka/e'. A. c,' - 5 End, PCH 1011 Si. 4. Hero.sdo 5f. 7 -LA -1=11M 71'9/ Tiry ,3", "93 /'fit yra. 0•V .1. v Q -�� rvu wrbcl of Fccide-7 f re /S la !f iE •�11 I LL /-L j_ _1._I I I_L Lt. 3 34 �•+ ,� L1J�_11.1_,_i��LL��I_ A s� s G1I�I�-I1_LLl I J -e l f•rnl V I I I ! I I I I I I I!' I _! I I I I I I I 9dD1 IDI/1 . _ 111••1'. /f/tl:rI I I I , ! 1 , : 'i ff11.1•I I I. 1 I I I! I I I I I I I � I I I I 1 I i( I I /-LI 123 I I 11231 ! ji-* .,. 1.1 •.-1. ,. .1.1.,.1.1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. 1 I I I , I I I t3 -4I 4_51 s -i .1.1.1.1 .1.1.•...1.1- .1 .1 .:.. 1 V I I I LLI rel•I-I1 1 -(JI I I I I I I I I I i I 1 1 1 1 /Ntl•1 I I I I I I I i l l l l l l I I I I I I I I i I I ,aA7iil Le/r/ ✓s. 3- Lowe �./ented rt. X/ tC SO/JO c�ELt'7 (L7. J/Ilt [�/GJG V/G 1 LH I V/C 1 LDS IVIG 1 LOS I V/C I LQ,' ii I. I IRI All 1 I I , rnursdor Jz !4 kl re 4u St_ J. Vkanr aor 'I L7 -91 @ Nerondo s 7�r 4 /4 4z 3o S or, r g' N. Koa5uvD8 f%14l�3 � 1 v Q c.) iE BEACH 07 -LA -1 P.M. 20.621-22.201 SR -1 in Hermosa Beach Parking Regulation Afterstudy M. Kodsuntie 7/18/94 Before vs. After Average Delay Time Hour Before - After Chan e Ave. Delay Time min. Ave. Speed (mph'/ Ave. Delay Time min. Ave. Speed m p h Ave. Deljy Time in. Ave. Speed (mph), 1500-1600 2.44 15.06 0.28 23.24 -2.16 +8.18 1600-1700 2.31 15.38 0.80 20.55 -1.51 +5.17 1700-1800 2.72 14.40 1.02 19.59 -1.70 +5.19 1800-1900 3.91 12.15 1.95' 16.37 -1.96 +4.22 Excludes delay times for 1840 to 1900 because of accident blocking S/B #3 lane. W mm"EMON Ll m mir 1NC1 1 1P.C.1115 070-1 !I., of W. auk 4 Ir e 0A Cal Ij vf IA. I'VI I N TRAVEL TIME AND : SP ED STUDY S/B SEPULVEDA BLVD, LONGFELLOW AVE. TO HERONDO/ANITA ST. 0.54 mi) P,M. WEDNESDAY, JULY 13, 1994 0 ACCIDENT BLOCKING SB # 3 LANE AT 8" ST ; o 2 J u- 35 w 3 — 30 u 25 (n 4 W 20 . 5- Z 6— 15 z � 1 7 W CL 8 I D 9 10 W 10- Q W 11 . 12 n 0 -� Q 13 w 14.00 1500 16: 0 17:00 Is -.00 19= 00 19 30 C Attachment No.4 ` 1 of 2 07 -LA -1 P.M. 20.621-22.201 SR -1 in Hermosa Beach Parking Reguiation Afterstudy M. Kodsuntie 6/24/94 Before and After Southbound Traffic Volumes During the PM Peak Period Location Time Before, After Change %Change Boundary PI. 1500 1864 1952 to +88 +4.7% 1600 2190 25740 +384 +17.5% to 1700 2138 23140 +176 +8.2% Gould Ave. 1800 2006 2426 +420 +20.9% Gould Ave. 1500 1797 1823) +26 +1.4% 1600 2122 25810 +459 +21.6% to 1700 2093 2571 +478 +22.8% 10th St. 1800 1952 2345© +393 +20.1% 10th St. 1500 1921 22160 +295 +15.4% 1600 1964 26840 +720 +36.7% to Herondo St. 1700 2000 30310 +1,031 +51.6% 1800 1604 2648 +1044 +65.1% O1 Taken from Traffic Investigation 07 -LA -1 P.M. 20.621-22.201 Log No. C911-1040 Attachment No.5. 0 Counted on Tuesday 6/4/91 @ Longfellow Ave. Q3 Counted on Wednesday 5/6/92 @ 275' N/O 18th St. ® Counted on Tuesday 4/19/92 @ 30' S/O 1st St. Attachment No. 4 2of2 07 -LA -1 P.M.20.621-22.201 SR -1 in Hermosa Beach Parking Regulation Afterstudy M. Kodsuntie 624/94 Southbound Per Lane Traffic Volumes During the PM Peak Period Location . Time Lane Number Total 1 2 3 Boundary PI. to Gould Ave. 1 1500 1952 1600 2574 1700 2314 1800 2426 Gould Ave. to 10th St. 2 1500 663 735 342 1823 1600 895 960 726 2581 1700 848 932 791 2571 1800 739 917 635 2345 10th St. to Herondo St. 3 11 1500 972 890 354 2216 1600 1054 1007 6-23. 2684 1700 1 232 1102 1 697 3031 1800 1072 998 578 2648 1 Counted on Wednesday 6/4/91 @ Longfellow Ave. Per/lane counts are not available for this section. 2 Counted on Wednesday 5/6/92 @ 275' N/0 18th St. 3 Counted on Tuesday 4/14/92 @a30' S/O 1st St. Attachment No. 5 1 of 2 07 -LA -1 P.M. 20.621-22.201 SR -1 in Hermosa Beach Parking Regulation Afterstudy M. Kodsuntie 6/24/94 V/C Ratio and LOS Before vs. After State Hwy Preferred Operation (c-1000 vph) Location Before` After . Time V/c LOS V/C LOS Chan e Boundary PI to Gould Ave. 1500 0.93 E 0.65 B -0.28 1600 1.10 F 0.85 D -0.25 1700 1.07 F 0.77 C -0.30 1800 1.00 F 0.81 D -0.19 Gould Ave. to 10th St. 1500 0.90 E 0.61 B -0.29 1600 1.06 F 0.86 D -0.20 1700 1.05 F 0.86 D -0.19 1800 0.98 E 0.78 c -0.20 10th St. to Herondo St. 1500 0.96 E 0.74 C -0.22 1600 0.98 E 0.89 D -0.09 1700 1.00 F 1.01 F +0.01 1800 0.80 D 0.88 D +0.10 " Taken from Traffic Investigation 7 -LA -1 P.M. 20.621-22.201 Log No.C911-1040 Attachment No. 5. Attachment, No. 5 2of2 07 -LA -1 P.M. 20.621-22.201 SR -1 in Hermosa Beach ParkingRegulation Afterstudy M. Kodsuntie 6/24/94 WC Ratio and LOS Before vs. After Balanced Operation (c=800 vph) Location Before* After Time V/C LOS V/C LOS Change Boundary PI to Gould Ave. 1500 1.17 F 0.81 D -0.36 1600 1.37 F 1.07 F -0.30 1700 1.34 F 0.96 E -0.38 1800 1.25 F 1.01 F -0.24 Gould Ave. to 10th St. 1500 1.12 F 0.76 C -0.36 1600 1.33 F 1.08 F -0.25 1700 1.31 F 1.07 F -0.24 1800 1.22 F 0.98 E -0.24 10th St. to Herondo St. 1500 1.20 F 0.92 F -0.28 1600 1.23 F 1.12 F -0.11 1700 1.25 F 1.26 F +0.01 1800 1.00 F 1.10 F +0.10 * Taken from Traffic Investigation 7 -LA -1 P.M. 20.621-22.201 Log No.C911-1040 Attachment No. 5. 7� tj + l y0410 tNN 4 4 v ] V O o0� 1 O 1y4 + l y0410 tNN �ll t• . O I I e � v • I] ,h.•°°N €o �vOu '� VI`N� V ra0n a k t gr�,rjr-r �,%rte _ .O P"! m� �1. h 1 i . � tll ' � I a . y0410 tNN �ll t• I I I e � v • I] ,h.•°°N €o �vOu IJ, h a . y0410 tNN �ll t• I I l I] ,h.•°°N €o �vOu '� VI`N� V ra0n k t gr�,rjr-r �,%rte 3r -'r .O P"! m� . � P.7S1111 mi: �- a�,�Nb/ �s opvo✓aft I , TQ -wk Q- y}�H� -- -'\ j, i MUU �fv^1i --- ---------vvv--- - ! -- QvvuO'vW uO c uo u R - - - -- - - --- --- -- v� nrpmo,m$$7 - �41 I rrA '°nm nv I j * - --- W 1,u I,Wtt �I�o�va;pe 1 Zj14 ,v \� �---- I I o ,�� ' e�•,v r n�n�; a OtiNry 8 V �ip`•h ^'^�A•�� .� �•' 'a°;l NRyh Ch `N'Itla��ro 1':1 `\�0,a�•��{� .,ri Ql 0- vmyrr�F��jtai la I i I. ,: '�`'yNMv4ivnmca r"nV�nV m!.?j I 10 ---- _ - - - - -_ ZZ 1 o t •� aM T T - jJt nrIv.Ia�il''` I SI t! -L f ;As pr o/ �O� ,�✓o�urvo� �ll t• I I l I] it 1 k t m� �1. h 1 i . �O� ,�✓o�urvo� ; 111111 I I l ; 111111 l k t TIME. F;CU - �f�Ma__1BER��OF aCCI TEAR I I I I I I I I I I I I TOTAL. I I I F— V) L T rums ACCIDENT SUMMARY ITS I INVOLVOrW I LICNT NO. PERSONSI TYPE Or ACCICE.4T IMEATI PACIFIC S lI-OI-9/ L 1548 t 07-//. 9/ t 1741 tt 07-03-1/L 1434 r•/ J //-Z7-f/L /520 COAST H I GH W A'Y ,f;!!07-/9-! J /L /4/3 fz* 0 /BOO _ C.Fd ./Z=AD•f/D 1734 01.05- f2 D 1712. �1 07- 02-f/ L .'a t _ NOTE ONLY WEEKDAY COLLISION DIAGRAM ACCIDENTS FROM 30OPM TO 7:OOPM LO=TION/DESCRIPTION ON SIB P.C.H. ARE IDENTIFIED IN DIST-CO-RTE ADCIDQ/T RATE THIS COLLISION PDSTYILES nrou—TO— DIAGRAM PREPARED BY. +TD_ U) O r Ln P A C I F I C C 0 A S T /1•/j•9/0 /707 W /1•!1-ei D /d/4 �r Y /1-/7•f• /dr7 V� Or--zs-f1 L .442 FM J 0E -u- fl LL _lS_3b�c - J i•4i'PZL / O Oi -/2.11 D ISOZ - a2-2e-fZP /753 H av cA = 00 _ NOTE: ONLY WEEKDAY ACCIDENTS FROM 300PM TO 7:OOPM ON SIB P.C.H. ARE IDENTIFIED IN THIS COLLISION DIAGRAM J LO 0 NO O 2 NOTE ONLY WEEKDAY COLLISION DIAGRAM ACCIDENTS FROM 30OPM TO 7:OOPM LO=TION/DESCRIPTION ON SIB P.C.H. ARE IDENTIFIED IN DIST-CO-RTE ADCIDQ/T RATE THIS COLLISION PDSTYILES nrou—TO— DIAGRAM PREPARED BY. +TD_ U) O r Ln P A C I F I C C 0 A S T /1•/j•9/0 /707 W /1•!1-ei D /d/4 �r Y /1-/7•f• /dr7 V� Or--zs-f1 L .442 FM J 0E -u- fl LL _lS_3b�c - J i•4i'PZL / O Oi -/2.11 D ISOZ - a2-2e-fZP /753 H av cA = 00 _ NOTE: ONLY WEEKDAY ACCIDENTS FROM 300PM TO 7:OOPM ON SIB P.C.H. ARE IDENTIFIED IN THIS COLLISION DIAGRAM �r PA C I F I C C 0 A ST H I G HW AY H I G H W A Y c I • b/f•91 L 1128 fvl ,o-a-9ZL nt4 �f� d-re•,e L rsae �. or*s•n L .rJn �t+� � E7. ref 0 //-or9/L /125 J J!' 07.0-fZ LL 1727��� 0•P-/+-91 L /730 .r/ • JPJ _ os -o+ -9r Lem�� �j Of -23- L L /7 9 /424 44f---,1/ /o -07.1/L.. J0.J 4/•of-fLL /7fZ 1Le - �Rv/ J � Y� ) Oz-Z4-9LD /Bao Ohb-f2L [T37 JPY/ 07-3'-921. /71 _ d-/V-fL L 1330 lXJ U) N (f) uJ-)d -- ro NOTE: ONLY WEEKDAY NOTE ONLY WEEKDAY ACCIDENTS FROM 30OPM TO 7:OOPM ACCIDENTS FROM ON SIB P.C.H. ARE 30OPM TO 7:OOPM IDENTIFIED IN ON SIB P.C.H. ARE THIS COLLISION IDENTIFIED IN DIAGRAM THIS COLLISION ---- DIAGRAM N PAC I F I C 00'21-9/L lSLS d-27-9LL /i3r J.1% O/ -St -l1 L /551 ,%j, 07-07-9Lt /738 h ,FYI o7-31-91 I. /700 J NOTE ONLY WEEKDAY d ACCIDENTS FROM 300pM TO 7:OOPM ON SIB P.C.H. ARE IDENTIFIED IN THIS COLLISION DIAGRAM C OAST I- NO FE: ONLY WEEKDAY ACCIDENTS FROM T) 30OPM TO 7:OOPM ON SIB P.C.H. ARE N IDENTIFIED IN THIS COLLISION DIAGRAM HIGHWAY J4I, 07 -A4 -f2 L 1709 O/ -/7-9L D 1750 F./ VJ O LO 0 NO O �r PA C I F I C C 0 A ST H I G HW AY H I G H W A Y c I • b/f•91 L 1128 fvl ,o-a-9ZL nt4 �f� d-re•,e L rsae �. or*s•n L .rJn �t+� � E7. ref 0 //-or9/L /125 J J!' 07.0-fZ LL 1727��� 0•P-/+-91 L /730 .r/ • JPJ _ os -o+ -9r Lem�� �j Of -23- L L /7 9 /424 44f---,1/ /o -07.1/L.. J0.J 4/•of-fLL /7fZ 1Le - �Rv/ J � Y� ) Oz-Z4-9LD /Bao Ohb-f2L [T37 JPY/ 07-3'-921. /71 _ d-/V-fL L 1330 lXJ U) N (f) uJ-)d -- ro NOTE: ONLY WEEKDAY NOTE ONLY WEEKDAY ACCIDENTS FROM 30OPM TO 7:OOPM ACCIDENTS FROM ON SIB P.C.H. ARE 30OPM TO 7:OOPM IDENTIFIED IN ON SIB P.C.H. ARE THIS COLLISION IDENTIFIED IN DIAGRAM THIS COLLISION ---- DIAGRAM N PAC I F I C 00'21-9/L lSLS d-27-9LL /i3r J.1% O/ -St -l1 L /551 ,%j, 07-07-9Lt /738 h ,FYI o7-31-91 I. /700 J NOTE ONLY WEEKDAY d ACCIDENTS FROM 300pM TO 7:OOPM ON SIB P.C.H. ARE IDENTIFIED IN THIS COLLISION DIAGRAM C OAST I- NO FE: ONLY WEEKDAY ACCIDENTS FROM T) 30OPM TO 7:OOPM ON SIB P.C.H. ARE N IDENTIFIED IN THIS COLLISION DIAGRAM HIGHWAY J4I, 07 -A4 -f2 L 1709 O/ -/7-9L D 1750 F./ VJ O a Attachment No. 2 Off% � COLLISION DIAGRAM BETWEEN AVIATION BLVD./ IOM'ST. L' +4iTA / FIE D_V7f ST. L:OaTION/DESCRIPTION C;7 -LA -0l :.S:{C,ATE ACZ=AT RATE —MILES FRou 2=To LL P9S•a?S BY. ." I:. ^-+TE. 7 /ell* O 2 a Attachment No. 2 Off% � COLLISION DIAGRAM BETWEEN AVIATION BLVD./ IOM'ST. L' +4iTA / FIE D_V7f ST. L:OaTION/DESCRIPTION C;7 -LA -0l :.S:{C,ATE ACZ=AT RATE —MILES FRou 2=To LL P9S•a?S BY. ." I:. ^-+TE. 7 /ell* 77 ..- .c:a• 'aW''c`i.• .t •--:j, �... �. - _, yJ4 �i�. +l - r... 't°- i:.? �e .t i y w• yam• ' !k SQA S.r +� ) My..', �a♦ -�L 'J"L�lw!• Yr.,, • H' 9 .I .._ - ..a_nt - .......... F . � `= 19511 ST SrAC[ 1►R a �.• IS•AT a ISOl s Iffm ST - t Sr 1 F-Fwi tl _� I_. t �_rv.1 y EI s m �_ MAHHATTM BEACH i 91 vo s, .�;: �KAVNATAII I _ ST AFT ERSTUDY SITE ST SB SR -I FROM ANITA/ HERONDO ST. ST ' ' ISI= gla I sT I o Tp BOUNDARY PL. IN THE CITY r 16]le1 hi ST F== -MOSA BEACH ST OF HER } • ! w I sr v_) �' ' X _ sr ST - 21 AV C3 " T 'r _ F40� j � ��r - Fl - V �� V LJ • _1 � ~=:r. i� a ST s R �•tDtM v1 _ 'a IST T - aS _ lads • 4 . T•�v AV a ' Ar 170711 •� < - S01 Ivdl = .�► f `1 AV VOOIeIE S .r T G e ■ t tl� AV < IST r29 ]�%.V _ ` S AV r w I11I0 ST f7■ G,, • - - - , LTi 71•__• •' • � i 'eros T • ear 1757■ I'm • c _ tls ` ASt SI It ; '• - 751r • s e' r,t. r n b a:t E51 a �; - ; 8l • tu n a ST et i.. • CAN" � � ITTT■ IT V Z s��ir .r,,,, •ri ,� J .n.► N T AV s�CI' ATS 9oNr •Irl s ITefM a ;T '` i. �.�. t• 1101 r'>1t lol u:, I LFJI� M , - ST NfPOS'A •tai`# �t!'�• 5t �3- _e., �•'6j\�`+ o rwll �a �w' HAITI C r�. t� i tji S, ' 14 I III/Do S \•, S '• .�� ♦.� �, *� 14NN1 U ' • Tar •' ■ g N. 1: t' �i ~ , 9 \�V `rr'`c uR� IN CtMt - {A` i■ �" 4 ,e tto 31• If IED t� „ � 16a0 T1 e_I � � L l t � 8 y tt t'1 E .- _ o ,�• � nA to ` � iTES � 3 I �•� .� � 'r t+z � t I` 8 ��' eE UI _ .A ,>< IM _ ST - EI Q - 3••s tont \'`; t.. s 1, nv'u . - rAtsn +�,, Sty' 9M St w rS IN u 9Q`f y - 1� AL1oN• U a - 1 AE■■SA pick / I n , a'+A - R • TM i-� - - ` pis 'J to FISX i UI .. L SntC h I1AY IN ER I i FISH V - S!'�C7• 7 UI I 4 Illi - u - I I at• t S .,? p SSA _ S• t. r 2101 sp 190TH tw ANVAOA I ST it K•QfAr-tvQ S: < /s { ' ✓,>x.Z iS �l�E '.'3;.. Sr - .. 101E \ 1 { i SEAM : .%�i•`GS ' �i "kgr��'T'a�t'S1'• fly ` - I ',. pA AST i ! r � trpa�M•I .�. � , � � �l I sar• A Ll AA .td = +yam � -••I . � y ;' t rt sT a 1 � s ' , ` \ ` 'a ' I 1 iia r TI■ a - SLYO 2 rIAG KAM/ \`\ \i, �•M •�'y. �•T�,_ �� I � El Of r.KM Cl1I •.�. \\���� • _ Iop�1 �!O SSA C c_-) 10 sZ 15 all ` 1 t ' tCST i ' SAAA "S I '..��'t�\ i_ - e �.t '!i�L '•s �I , a, s ON :IpeEuQ 8 1t" a i I CT WJWT i..�. -� O` y/ •� .-. w0 ,. St 8 1 iA ST •p■ flElwl • 8 t/1 O 1 ASTFil1A ST M r ( i-' i ST ItA,IICaA ST WAICTYAJ tutu IMU d.kwa _ — ��. ;tl r .09"lol , 1-•I --tan : c -- m• —.w ---iT--- 1 AOrtmf'Afl a.ua. Ca t INo ON I O - raAr u ' S.iAyr•r } R t - < � I f•T I � f (!.40 1 fq rATr • I � �.' 31 �' _ '� 1 � �w A t M G DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIGN/INSTALLATION ORDER d iOSM-323A(REV-?IN) '.Vint of Use Shipment D DATE PREPARED PAGELOF 0 • j _ rrr DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIGN/INSTALLATION ORDER d iOSM-323A(REV-?IN) '.Vint of Use Shipment D DATE PREPARED PAGELOF 0 07 MO. DAY YEAR 0.(,91/, 9, COUNTY ROUTE POST MILT S L A Zo, X21 - M' P DISTRICT IDENTIFICATION • PURCM "ORDER NUMBER T O ITEOUANnTY CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATION M R 17 � EXIST -A R�f3 ON P C. H C° W fA CI'MoSq Qch. BASE PAN ILL- PORCELAIN ALUMINUMREMOI/E it SALVA4E EX IST '?,I-? )J 5 6RN) FNBT• O OVERLAY ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑FLAT O BEVELED EDGE POJ{, LDcAT�D aPPRox. 96 SIO s* sT souTl/ __ SINGLE: SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL -� y4E--- °N "MIAa11 RE 5TANDa2D OM E. 906k; F Sr kFmoC3 GROUND MOUNTED E3GROUND MOUNTED (.__� Thw* .4 a ID(16r E AND SALVAGE iZ 17 Slcuv FNf3'r 13 OVERHEAD ❑ OVERADHE(A.—ImIalw do t+o SLE pc! sr ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND h 74 , J PANEL.• ALUMINUM BI - d,117PAOUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCRS ONLVI REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ A63 E3 X063 FRAMED ❑ ENCLOSED LENS O mo C3mo FRAMED _ P. G_ �. ❑ ENCAPSULATED Lama y COPY SIPYTYPE ARROW 0 UNE UC LC CAP R PLN RIB Ria V L: t - UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE i oUANnTY COOS SIZE COLOR LOCATION y 3,q_2 30 -wx 30 -" Rf 6 w P.G.H. I st 8r i.4ffu BASE PANELPORCELIUN ALUMINU j � Y NJ 3TA3 Z 6 61 W FNST aJ P(:X ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL D FLAT D SEVELED EDGE APPRO)(. 96 4/0 /s* St.. SOUTH CW64NE. SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL ZNSrALL 'R 0-f-7. SWJ 04 WAI NUKE 6-MAIPAR0 . ❑ GROUND MOUNTED O GROUND MOUNTED"—: Th�0 7 . HSN 41Z�� ��►���-E. -- OVERHEAD WWALL F.34-2. CAN REFLECTIVESHEETING BACKGROUND PANEL ALUMINUM _ ❑ OPAOUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCS/RS ONLY) REFLECTIVE SHEETING 13 A53 ❑ .063 FRAMED ❑ ENCLOSED LENS 0 a O A60 FRAMED ❑ ENCAPSULATED LENS COPY SIZE COPY TYPE w UNE UC LC CAP ARROW DEGREE PLN RJa RIS IQ22le Z UNIT PRICE TOTAL MICE I PREP. BY CMKD. BY APPROVAL SIGNS INSTALLED M , K • DISTRICT TRAFFIC ENGINEER BY DATE DATE TO MAINZ PACKED BY -DA NO. t TYPE • PK3 MIT. SHIP OATE • BY SHIPPED VIA WE BILL • i Use Continuation "�;.�$ .??��,t;;,`t.� 3238 for More Space. SOURCE CHti EXPENDITUi'.3 I DESIGNATION FA FA AGCY DEAMOUNT FFY UNIT 10187. AUTHORIZi Cf - CB'►' _—,� .�..w. .... DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "SIGN/INSTALLATION ORDER - Contlnuation Shoot MA.s.aBM•323e (REV, 7•16I DATE PREPARED PAGE OF MO DAY YEAR o d /:I o7 DISTRICT IDENTIFICATION . PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER COUNTY 70� �A1 POST MILE ITEM 3 OUANTITY CODE / R34 Z SIZECOLOR 30w• &)-H 11Fjg ON vJ LOCATION it �n C/`Mo ra .H • @ I �,T. OW Corner FN61 BASE PANEL•PORCELAIN ALUMINUM IN.SrALL R.3g_2_s/4NFN6T W -PCGN. LO OVERLAY ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE 6 ��Q-- �sr cSj, Nor/!+ Cu�gUIVE. .INSTALL . _ SINGLE: SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL R3'4'Z _ .5/GN__ON __ WOOD. POS•r 1NlTH _ 7 A4/NJ, _ _ ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED 'r*" GlRO4ND CLc_AP_AfJC,E. ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (A• Mnt*" 11 ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND 1 No fe BASE PANEL ALUMINUM ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCS/RS ONLY) REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ =3 . ❑ AS3 FARMED. . mo ❑I ENCLOSED LENS ❑ D ❑ ASO FRAMED e /NSTA/1 R_34 -2"A z 'LENS J/4N FNBT --.16' f.NSIZE COPVTYPE I CSCE. PFM14, =y �lgtl) LINE uC LC WARROW PLN RA PA UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE ITEM OUANTITY • CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATION . Soh Qs ON e, E PANEL•PORCELAIN ALUMINUM OVERLAY J iiRN+. 'SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE SINGLE: SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED 0-flum ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (A-_mwomwo D REFLECTIVE SMEEnNG BACKGROUND BABE PANEL: ALUMINUM Tnw F+EtE a� aura ❑ OPAOUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCBrRS ONLY) IVSHEETING 3 ❑ =3 FRAMED CTE ❑ AS CLOSED LENS a RBD,❑ABO FRAMEDNCAP C SULATED LENS r - COPY SIZE COPY TYPEARROW q . t L s -Ln LSI s� f / a4to /l DgAa LINE NC LC CV EGREE PLN RIS RIS UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE ITEM ++QUANTITY t I I CODESIZE P 3 8 EX/ST JCOLOR -rel '^/ G LOCATION Iq 4rA44dq @ra(, P.G•@ I s' ST �' side r ,r ON . PANELPORCELAIN ALUMINUM EXlSr. K38-S16AI_ _FNBl7 FROM AAg2GDC _ ZBASE OVERLAY ❑SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL FLAT ❑BEVELED EDGE- ze� N -4 1 -Sr' . akm . evRdU�t/E_7D_ r4RXars6V SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL N/O /-s .5 r NORT!/ GuR6u�vE . _. _ /NsrALL �31>t ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED TWO At/ Ltd,�,rnV�1/R�.__6mNDARM R M ,-7 ..-H/N. a+LONND c4.6AZAAAc E. — ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVE MEAD (A-�� wowwo ❑ REFLECTIVE SMEETING BACKGROUND i'"Z!► �'� I` Ado .Qc�l lG BABE PANEL, ALUMINUM ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCLIN ONLY) PC • N REFLECTIVE $MEET'ING ❑ Am ❑ im FRAMED . s ENCLOSED LENS ❑ ASO ❑ ASD FARMED ` ❑ ENCAPSULATED LENS RE�(ovE a;3s COPY SIZE COPY TYPE _ RROW LINE uC LC TIRE fLN M q E PRICE r"EpARTME.4T OF TRANSPOcATION -SIGNANSTALLATION ORDER Continuation Shoot DATE PREPARED PAGE OF MQ DAY YEAR o6 1 /3114 Aonl DISTRICT 10ENTIFICATION + PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER COUNTY ROUTE POST MILE ITEM OUANTm I CODE SIZE COLOR kj LOCATION pout (5> /r f .7r. A/E D. F,var Hern 5 / R34-2 30 "wx 3D m SON w 1�f ota EASE PANEL•PORCELAIN ALUMINUM IMSTALL- 834-2 AND K92A6 oD) 3PM-7P AmJ-w) OVERLAY ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE ON PCH V Ptsr AAPQoy. Z$ ' N/o _ /AY sr. SINGLE SKEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL him Cu"ump- .- IN.5 LL 934-2 it RSZ G('D) ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED Th11:q I ❑OVERHEAD �� ❑OVERHEAD (k MalGwarN / aA/ ,£X�sr METIlc- ibsr ll/ITiJ 6 J ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING SACKGROUND 6N RONND CA r A rANM SEE si6N GAYo&eT EASE PANEL ALUMINUM DEA 1,L y 5 C' LO -- 6 Z3 ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCB/RS ONLY) 1 4 _g REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ A83 ❑ A83 FRAMED . _ _ ❑ ENCLOSED LENS ❑ ASO ❑ mo FRAMED /ACs /ei9-Z IF 11PSULATED LENS F9 A ( o FWBT C t4iZE COPY TYPE ��E OE-wA. Anew) LINE UC LC CAP ARROW R 'LN . RA iN UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE ITEM QUANTITY CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATION PCN sr NE G1dd rlu&7- 6 J IZ62-A GugD 3L3 •Mh1 /8-M 5 ON v1/ I . 'n m M r BASE PANEL•PORCELAIN ALUMINUM OVERLAY i HI - a. 9rbu rl d TANGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT C3 BEVELED EDGE CIC,Q, "ele_ 4o SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL bo4�,4�/vu"�i_ o'F ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED Imo_' TWM ,b ♦ 7'TOW Si N ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERMEAD (A- HVt&W0 /06+ ma is � ❑ Rv ECTw SHEETING BACKGROUND EASE PANEL ALUMINUM G OPAQUE COATED IMETAL GAUGE /OCIRM ONLY) SHEETING 0 =3 ❑ A83 FRAMED o J � FRI PM 82 A CN 0 D) CREFLECTIVE (CLOSED LENS ❑ ABO ❑ ASO FRAMED ! -tNCAPSULATM LENS -_ COPY SIZE y COPY TYPE .9!&AJ L4YO uT' b E`TA / L , ITEMS 6 ARROW LINE UC Lc w Et3REE PLN RA PIS UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE ITEM OUANTMf CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATK;N G �® P� •" ( I (:34.2 30'ax 30 1 R � ON v,/ m BASE PANELPORCELAIN ALUMINUM I=.R.34-2. �' R82 A (Moab. sI6Ks FNBrQIr OVERLAY , 'L" 1 SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑FLAT C)iEVELEO EDGE 4 ' Hlo I s*.PL, llIOQTN ej1R jW_ Aub SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL W/O OGN. Wor 4agjL XE. jAI.ML 934-2 ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED I ThkAO ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (M Nw waro / Rae :A (Moo)���aV wo fosr :Vn G MN ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND _LtR4o1ND CLE' RAW -• -ice-- — BASE PANEL• ALUMINUM ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCB/RS ONLY) I Rib .SCre IG . REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ A83 ❑ =3 FUMED ENCLOSED LENS ❑ mo Cl ASD FUMED U ENCAPSULATED LENS COPY blue +PV TYPE J INSiia y ;r•.- -.� f 4 R a'' 2 • _ .... ;• ! b LINE vc LC u 4%.141 IIA RA J P LOW11 UNIT PC s l BASE PANEL -PORCELAIN ALUMINUM FNT OF TRANSPORTATION $iGNANSTALLATION ORDER OVERLAY iD SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL Continuation Shut ! SINGLE: SHEET FORMED PANEL DAS-OBM-3230 (REV.7'SS► DATEPREPARED PAGE OF D GROUND MOUNTED L---' TNW MO. DAYi YEAR0 7 06113 f9 ❑ OVERHEAD (A-. mardww" ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND OUNY ROUTE POST MILE ' DISTRICT IDENTIFICATION. PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER COUNTY A 1 SIZE COLOR LOCATION PGtf(:P> ITEM QUANTITY 1000E b / R 82A&I 3 8 -wx /8 -H B ON W A f4e4/ MOS4 BASE PANEL:PORCELAIN ALUMINUM OVERLAY iAiA. ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE ❑ ABO ❑ ABO FRAMED SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ 0ROUNOMOUNTEDL�-'�+�4 COPY TYPE ❑ OVERHEAD OVERHEAD IA- Hawslal ❑ re E 62A (MOD) -ft, 3- 7►M ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND " -"`� BASE PANEL: ALUMINUM 1 6 Nlw, ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCS/RS ONLY) REFLECTIVE SHEETING 0=3 ❑ ABS FRAMED D INCLOSED LENS .D ABO O ABO FRAMED = I PSULATED LENS T+IPE COPYARROW — SIDE►Vi11.K - - C 131ZE UNE UC LG GAP R PLN RA R� slew INsTAL.1., Ty" DETAIL CoAPWAY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE LOCATION � K, 3 nod 3T- FN T '8T %�! /�lCf/Nolb ITEM owNTm CODE B+zE COLOR 2 W. ON Y ucii SASE PANEL•PORCELAIN ALUMINUMi 7�I57A[.t.. ; W S¢ - •' Si6u- FiVBr oN PCN. ABX. OVERLAY ' ,INGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE JO' Nlo 31-01 s -r_ NDRT}I WR&AVE PAJ LW4jAJA/RE SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL 57APOAkD W 11 i 7"A410- 450aW dj eA9A/CJ---- ❑ GROUND MOUNTED B GROUND MOUNTED L.—.zThIdO INSi71LL O?XE+F W-5+- si�►N F�f D OVERHEAD D oVERHFaO (A•...NaNllMat» ❑ RE'FLECTIVESHEETINGSACKGROUND P4W, • APPkQIC. G��/D 3�dsi--. SOalf�/ Cu�tBU I BABE PANEL:- ALUMINUM AND Z.S' 1U�o R G N• k/F.Sr C�/�8! /'�E oN D OPAQUE COATED itETitL GAUGaE •OM1 N/oOD P0.ST W Ir?/ • 7� /tA/A/. 6RoUN0 CtEAQAAIC�. EFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ JJSs ❑ s►Ba FAA#IED . sacs f%1A<2"M $ELNU. CLOSED LENS Q mo FIIAMED .:�VCAPSULATED UDIS 1 COPY SIZE TY*E COPYARROW LINE uC LC CAP DEOPEE PLN UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE LOCATION C �'- FNl3% FSljT Yyj �G`/NcIS G S - ITEM IOUANTIT/ CODE SIZE COLOR -H ON BASE PANEL -PORCELAIN ALUMINUM I OVERLAY iD SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL to FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE ! SINGLE: SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL ❑ GROUND MOUNTED D GROUND MOUNTED L---' TNW ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (A-. mardww" ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND BASE PANEL:- ALUMINUM ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCWN ONLY) ,._ REFLECTIVE SHEETING O ABS O aw FRAMED ENCLOSED LENS ❑ ABO ❑ ABO FRAMED ,J ENCAPSULATED LENS COPY SIZE COPY TYPE LINE LC LC CAP 1 i INSTALL k/54 '•'SIGNS FrlBT- a MIN Go►A Cck7 UNIT PRICE MXALL w5t SlbtJs F'SBT � �•^i,�r (3P.ND CcR 7 ` DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOR'ATION SIGN/INSTALLATION ORDER Continuation Shoot A DATE PREPARED PJ PAGE OF MO. DAY YEAR 0(0 /3199 o1 DISTRICT IDENTIFICATION a PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER COUNT;^ LLOC►TION ROUTE POST MILE ITEM QUANTITY CODE SIZE COLOR /aC f- pi aawGd: Mar �c�+ /O ,' R34'2 34.w• 3o'" R i S ON W ir? If�rlsv fa BASE PANEL'PORCELA.IN ALUMINUM OVERLAY i�STALL R 34-A ANS R82kCMoD1 514N3 FNVT ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL O FLAT O sEvELED EDGE ON PCA. APPXW. -48" N/o tt� 3T. Nom, SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL euwNE . ON bwoo P05T WIM O GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED 1 'Th'e" C3rd OVERHEAD ". ❑ OVERHEADIA- Haware) GRDUJI� CLA/QCL� • �,rp, ! ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING ! BACKGROUND r m BASE PANEL' ALUMINUM NO SCALE L ❑. OPAOUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCB/RS ONLVI P C•A REFLECTIVE SHEETING O .067 . ❑ A87 FRAMED. ❑ ENCLOSED LENS O mo ❑ AN FRAMED _ f ;APSULATED LENS INSTALL iC �� 'L t C ISizE COPY TYPE R81AC/�) SINS FNBf I 'fes' ST (SEE DIQGE,AM $ELOwi uNE Ue I LC u• ARROW PLN we M UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE ITEM OUANTTTY CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATION P '(�{ N� ovaot . irNaT // R82A (Hoo) 3 8 -w+l /8,♦ B oN N/ i h Re a VM OS O BASE PANEL:PORCEL AIN ALUMINUM 51!„tJ INSTALLATI O►J DETXiL< (2LNGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL OVERLAY ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE / Ihr�► SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL Cl GROUND MOUNTED O GROUND MOUNTED -7 UM ❑ ovERHEm (3 OVERHEAD (A• Harewa O aN_ "; a—RgZ/, 00100)BASE RLECIIVESVIEETM ❑EF BACKGROUND PANEL• ALUMINUM C;OPAOUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCBM ONLY) _ ' N/." VLECTIVE SHEETING 13 =3 E3 AN FARM®pI (CLOSED LENS 13 BIS.y Q .m - CAPSULATEFI LENS - COPY SIZE CtIr#TYPE - LoADNAY SiGi�K44L K LINE UC LC CAP PLN M RN UNIT PRICE TOTAL MiK3 • ITEM OUANTITY CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATION P&H e V—+L St Na 0 FN3T /,;7-1 I / I R3 -f-2- 30 'w• -so -H le f R ON 'Al jl� Htr»+osa Beach. BASE PANEL•PORCEL.AIN ALUMINUMRUY 1 S TALL R.34'Z.„fr 982-AC�(O17� v&o s FN$T ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL L0 FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE ON PSH.. APP.2ox .. �2 ' IVIo a'°d sr. NOIETH .__ SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL Cl A&oJE _- DA/ LLIM/NII /RE STANAW WnN ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED L—'ThIO10 ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (M HwdwIM NOS O REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND BASE PANEL• ALUMINUM _ ❑ OPAOUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCBM ONLY) - REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ An ❑ A67 FRAMED - ENCLOSED LENS D mo D mo FRAMED U ENCAPSULATED LENS COPY SIZE COPY TYPE IN377ILL�� R�w31-Z �._ AR LINE NC LC CAP O{.N M PA ORE y. � KAZA GNDO) .. TO`0- r A • � F ^rEPARTMENT DR �e►ANSPCR'AnON SIGNANSTALLATION ORDER Continuation Shoot OAS-O9M•323E fREV. ? lW DATE PREPARED PAGE , OF MQ DAY YEAR obil3 11 fi o 0 DISTRICT IOENrmcAnON • PURCMASE ORDER NUMBER COUNTY ROUTE POST MILE ' ITEM QUANTITY CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATION PGH @ 4`� ST IJ E 42L44,FNBT l3 / RUA (1401 3 8 /8 '" ( B oN Wjyj Hc-rmosa B UC I 6c C� I DEGREE I PLN I Rr•� TI .- ® •+oN-FiG it 62A (MoD) I I.IAIA INAIRE b' HIK s-rAIJA�RD SIOt:WALK- / RoAl - 516W /NS7-ALLA7IDlJ DETA_IL— Uwr PRICE I TOTAL PR10E BASE PANEL•PORCELAIN ALUMINUM LOCATION PCN S i' NF_ CJNa d . F N 8 T _ COLOR OVERLAY a s w avm 1= s -r a CA ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE BASE PANEL•PORCELMNALUMINUMOVERLAY SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL I SAM PANEL•PORCELMN ALUMINUM ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTS I .1 -flim ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (M Ha�M�N APPROX.. fJ$� Tll0 -f 14, Sf /Jovy cag-84 NE, ❑ AEFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEA0IM�M�rOw�n1 46E PANEL ALUMINUM tV1TlJ J' A4/N. �,QDuND. ti.E/ttZ,4Nc�. _ ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE tOCS/RS ONLYI INSTALL offl�R k/64. 5laJ F587' AT 5�N/ REFLECTIVE SHEETING [3.m3 ❑ aw FRAMED ❑ REFLECTIVE aHEEnNG Lummouwa ❑ ENCLOSED LENS D .OBD 13 zoo FRAMED ❑-NCAPSULATED LENS $0147N-- "Ab"IJE j 1u87ALL SIM ON WooD UC I 6c C� I DEGREE I PLN I Rr•� TI .- ® •+oN-FiG it 62A (MoD) I I.IAIA INAIRE b' HIK s-rAIJA�RD SIOt:WALK- / RoAl - 516W /NS7-ALLA7IDlJ DETA_IL— Uwr PRICE I TOTAL PR10E UNIT PIIICE TOTAL PRICE ITEM QUANTITYCOOS SIZE COLOR LOCATION PCN S i' NF_ CJNa d . F N 8 T _ COLOR / 2 Ws -,f 34 -ft 30 8 ON y a s w avm 1= s -r a CA I BASE PANEL•PORCELMNALUMINUMOVERLAY INSTALL W5'F SIGN .FNBT oN WMINAIRE Sk/ FS ST Rcrrmosok Bc"-% I SAM PANEL•PORCELMN ALUMINUM k3NNGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL C FLAT 13 BEVELED EDGE 31 Nggy� L.001lTF� ON EAST S10E OF PGN SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL APPROX.. fJ$� Tll0 -f 14, Sf /Jovy cag-84 NE, PC N ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEA0IM�M�rOw�n1 SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATm PANEL E3 aROUNo MouNTED (3 GROUND MOuNm"—..7mo tV1TlJ J' A4/N. �,QDuND. ti.E/ttZ,4Nc�. _ BABE PANEL ALUMINUM I ❑OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCiA1a ONLY) 1- REFLECTIVE SHEETING . ❑ .Ota ❑ =3FRAMED ❑ OVERHEAD C ovEwmiA—m--ew.rN INSTALL offl�R k/64. 5laJ F587' AT 5�N/ J ENCAPSULATEOLMS ❑ REFLECTIVE aHEEnNG Lummouwa , CORaifR OF ,�i1 € 44 ST, Q�¢� S/D Si* sT ZN57-ALL t✓S4 3law (.SET: OF -TAIL- ON. NEX?" ; .. UNIT PRt TOTAL PRICE BABE PANEL•ALUMINUM ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE IOCB/RS ONLY) $0147N-- "Ab"IJE j 1u87ALL SIM ON WooD REREcTIVE SHEEnNG 0 =3 '13 40.1 FRAMED POST ' W RN 7 : M IN G)RWND. CL.aARA AI(,E, f ACLOSED LENS D ma ❑ .OBD FIIAMED (ALSO Aft DEfA/L ori NEXT pA6iE.) - - _ IcENCAPSULATED LENS - -- COPY SIZE - y COPY TYP1< ,- UNE i UC I LC I CAP I PLN I OV UNIT PIIICE TOTAL PRICE ITEM 1 QUANTITY I CODE SIZE COLOR LOCa►TION Q 'H 9qs�F{, St tis Q Am . 'F N wr 'h I -wY �H oN Sk/ FS ST Rcrrmosok Bc"-% I SAM PANEL•PORCELMN ALUMINUM 1(/0 scm4E I OVERLAY ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL 0 RAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTEDThw, PC N ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEA0IM�M�rOw�n1 D REFLECTIVE aHEEnNO BAcxaROuNo - -- BABE PANEL ALUMINUM I ❑OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCiA1a ONLY) 1- REFLECTIVE SHEETING . ❑ .Ota ❑ =3FRAMED _ # ybN ZNSrALL WS4 FNa7- C ExCLOBED LENa C .OBo C aw FRAMED J ENCAPSULATEOLMS �•r COPY SIZE COPYT/PE ZN57-ALL t✓S4 3law (.SET: OF -TAIL- ON. NEX?" ; .. UNIT PRt TOTAL PRICE ROW UNE LC LC CAr ORE rLN RA RYE ' EEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIGN/INSTALLATION ORDER Continustion Shoot w.areu.7��w rwFV 7.118% DATE PREPARED PAGE , OF MDAY YEAR Q I C ob i3 9� 07 b� DISTRICT IDENTti1CAT10N + PURCMASE ORDER NUMSEII COUNTY I ROUTE /OST MILE ITEM I OUANTTIY CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATION J?6A @ S) SW QvOid• FS T -in 'Ws IN ON ✓I'IO G SASE PANEL•PORCELAIN ALUMINUM OVERLAY I AIIA4 ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL W5,f ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED(Thic" ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (A- HWdW 0 1] REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND SASE PANEL• ALUMINUM ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCINMS ONLY) REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑.DSI ❑ =1 FRAMED Cl ENCLOSED LENS Cl .DSO ❑ AN FRAMED _ "I�CJIPSULATED LENS _ SIZE COPYTYPE su va(.rc ROADWAY LINE uc LC ! CAP PLN PA PA UNfT PMpCi TOTAL PRICs ITEM QU"W" ' CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATION 6H N/i✓ CVW4P_ fNar /S . / Kai _Z 30 ' 43 z a ON Vj JN Ai5OJA &EAC14. SASE PANEL•PORCELAIN ALUMINUM /,.34-2 R 8ZA CNW) FNrgr cW OVERLAY/N6rAa :SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL C3 FLAT C3 BEVELED EDGE LUXPIVAJRE Sff YVARD 40CAMD @ f41W � G N/AJ CORNER- OF PGH /{ ND $% rtlllN ' SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL C3GRouNoMOUNTED ❑ GROUNDMOUNML�•Thleq C�tRDUND C,�EA2�4NcE. A[�So, ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (A.- mWea " ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING SUMMOUNID I y SASS PANEL- ALUMINUM - G OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCURS ONLY) REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ an ❑ASS FRAMED NCLOSED LENS O ASO.I ❑ ASO FumeD JN A34 Z f A SZ A CHDO� FNsrNCAPSULATED _� CLENSCALFS COPY SIZE COPYTYPE 7771 LINE IARROWuC LC W EOREE PLN M IVB UNff PRIGS TOTAL PIpCE 1 ITEMI OUANTITY CODE SIZE COLOR LOCATION P� c..¢� $r N AI c,09Ng_2 FQ B /f1 f 8ZA(uev) 39) -at 8 ON Vti tN HE -"OSA SEACN BASE PANEL -PORCELAIN ALUMMUM 1avow-AV D SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL in FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE SINGLE: SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL R 34-Z ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED 1 .1him ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD (A-_Nnriwwo ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND7 Ri .�_ asZA (MOD) IBASS PANEL, ALUMINUM_ ❑ OPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCBM ONLYI REFLECTIVE SNEETING C3=3 ❑ ASS FRAMED b MIN. LUMINAIRE ENCLOSED LENS, 0 m ❑ASO fRA1AE0 57ANOACA J ENCAPSULATED LENS . COPY SIZE CQPYTYPE .>✓�iEY/AkK LINELIG LC W RE RN IVB RA #= UNIT PRICS i TWA` PAICS I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SlOWINSTALLATION ORDER DA3-OSM•323A (REV. 7/86I _(pint of Use Shipment ❑ .nergency2l Day Delivery ❑ M �l DATE PREPARED PAGE 10-1 _nom:. MO. DAY YEAR 0,6 M. LA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SlOWINSTALLATION ORDER DA3-OSM•323A (REV. 7/86I _(pint of Use Shipment ❑ .nergency2l Day Delivery ❑ M �l DATE PREPARED PAGE 10-1 OF MO. DAY YEAR 0,6 Use Continuation COUNTY noun POST MILE M. LA I P DISTRICT IDENTIFICATION. PURCNABE ORDER NUMS" T D ITEM / OUANTITY 2R CODE 17 SIZECOLOR , -ft 29-H e 4 R ON W LOCATION PCH (V St' PL FN5T' IN O F -RM 05A ZEAC.K BASE PANEL PORCELAIN ALUMINUM OVERLAY 1.}~ ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑ FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED Thwo ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERMEAO (A- HWd■lala) I 114" ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND BABE PANEL ALUMINUM I I ) rPAQUE COATED METAL GAUGE (OCSIRS ONLY) L. i' REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ ass ❑ m3 FRAMED ❑ ENCLOSED LENS ❑ .OBD ❑ ABO FRAMED C3 ENCAPSULATED LENS p��,��� REMOVE FROM LOCATIONS COPY SIZE COPYTYPE SHOWN -ON PANE L ARROIN LINE UC LC CAPDEGREF-PLN IVa Rh UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE =M QUANTITY `2 . 2 CODE K 3g 2 SIZE 30-ft3C?� —1N COLOR LOCATION PCH 8 PL. FNB-" I N 4 i=R MOSA 15EACA - BASE PANEL PORCELAIN ALUMINUM _ OVERLAY 30' ❑ SINGLE SHEET FLAT PANEL ❑FLAT ❑ BEVELED EDGE SINGLE SHEET FORMED PANEL LAMINATED PANEL ❑ GROUND MOUNTED ❑ GROUND MOUNTED L_' ThW0 ❑ OVERHEAD ❑ OVERHEAD(A• Hw&mwo + ❑ REFLECTIVE SHEETING BACKGROUND ll PANEL• ALUMINUM OPAOUE COATED MET,%L GAUGE (OCS/RS ONLY)REFLECTIVE SHEETING ❑ _=❑ =3 FRAMED r,3 C3ENCLOSE, LENS .00G ❑ AM FRAMED ENCAPSULATED LENS 1. LL @ LOCATIONS SHOWA COPY SIZE COPY TYPt oto PA&EJ . 2 LINE UC ARROW LC CAP DEGREE PLN Rh M UNIT PRICE' TOTAL PRICE PREP, BY CHKO. BYAPPROVAL SIGNS INSTALLED DISTRICT TRAFFIC ENGINEER By DATE DATE TO MAINT. PACKED BY -DATE NO. l TYPE • PKG. wr. SHIP DATE • BY SHIPPED VIA WT. BILL • Use Continuation t • 240 _ 1 ST r-4,7 FN$T AA& a I N srA LL- V_Z-q -2 V= kAer rn 1 ~ 1 o i R 82A C v\bV) - 24' To 'ICid•MA�N 2 ' r. .row..... __.w .ww.ww .._.w. .......w...�� w.ww. �w_..Mw .. �..w w....w... w.w... ..w.ww _.._. PAC-1-FIC—COAST :.+....... ........ .w..... w.. ... .MHWAY w.w... w.w.w. ........ .......w ......... ......... ...M.... ..M.N............ MMMNM...M MMM ...M.M w.Mw. Mwww. .w.w.N ......... ........ ......M .wwww ...w.w .MM.. M.w.w ...MM .NM..M....Mw .r ...M..•...M..... M./w.• ...wM ws....• .w.ww ......w ........ .... ..N 2 I •_ ; AGRAM M CONDITION AND IMPROVEMENT DIAGRAM � OVE ANP $ALVA6rE n T -LA -1 21.081 "sr R 17 FN$•T AND PocItIC Corot Hiry 8th Placa i � • STALL RZi4--2 FNS' • In Hem. a Beach 3-7PM 1- LTt !. ILP �L EXIsr R 92A ( MOP) TO REMAI/1 NO SCALE Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 6, 1994 Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 REQUEST FOR 30 -DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENTS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council extend for thirty (30) days the temporary appointment of a Clerk typist, an Administrative Aide and a Senior Building Inspector in the Community Development Department. Background: The Community Development Department, Building Division, is maintaining three temporary appointments until such time as a determination regarding the restructuring of the Department is finalized. These position are: (1) Building Inspector assigned Senior Building; (2) Clerk Typist assigned Administrative Aide; and, (3) a temporary employee assigned tot he Clerk Typist position. Analysis: Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach City Code precludes a temporary appointment of an individual to a permanent Civil Service position for more than six months without approval from the City Council every thirty (30) days. Respectfully Subm' t Cori ur: Robert A. Blackwood, Direct Stephen R. Burrell Personnel & Risk Management City Manager cc: Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director my/extend CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DECEMBER 6, 1994 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council From: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager Subject: Pier Renovation Project Proposal Review On November 23, 1994 the City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department received three proposals for the development of construction documents and engineering for the Pier Renovation Project. The responding project teams were as follows: Cash & Associates Edward Carson Beall/ Anvick Engineering Moffat & Nichols/ Kirkpatrick Associates On December 5, 1994 members of the Pier Committee and City staff conducted interviews of the prospective consultants. The unanimous decision of the review board was that more proposals were required in order to fully examine the potentials of the project. For this reason it is the opinion of the review committee to readvertise for proposals with the new opening scheduled for January 26, 1994. It is hopeful that this additional time will allow a greater number of consultants to respond to the request. Interviews with the top respondents will be held the first week in February, with award of the contract expected at the February 14, 1994 City Council meeting. I in I Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council A 4 �i�/9Y December 5, 1994 Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 AWARD OF BID FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 TO JUNE 30, 1998 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Landscape West Inc. for the provision of City parks landscape maintenance for the period ending June 30, 1998 for the total amount of $331,164; 2. Authorize staff to issue a notice to proceed and issue addenda within budget limitations. Background: Landscape West, Inc. has been under contract for the past three years to provide landscape maintenance of City parks. The contract expired June 30, 1994. Landscape West, Inc. agreed to work on a month to month basis until the City awarded a new contract. Specifications for the Landscape Maintenance Contract were completed by staff on October 19, 1994 and the request for bids was advertised in the Easy Reader. Six (6) sealed bids were received, publicly opened and read aloud by the City Clerk on November 23, 1994. Analysis: The following are parks landscape areas covered by the previous contract and included in the proposed contract. 1. Valley Park 2. Clark Stadium 3. Com. Center/Civic Center 4. Edith Rodaway Park 5. Seaview Parkette 6. Fort Lots -0 -Fun Parkette 7. Moondust Parkette 8. Greenwood Park 9. Bicentennial Park 10. Kay Etow Parkette * To come on line July 1, 1995 Work activities to be contracted are shown below: 1. Turf Care 7. Soil Aeration 2. Edging & Triimming 8. Thatch Control 3. Shrubs 9. Weed Control 4. Fertilization 10. Tree Maintenance _ 5. Irrigation 11. Litter Control 6. Insect/Disease/Pest 12. Annual Plantings Control 11. Ingleside Parkette 12. 4th & Prospect 13. 8th & Valley 14. Scout Park 15. Ardmore & 5th 16. Greenbelt Park 17. Sandhill Parkette 18. 3rd & Prospect 19. "Biltmore Park 20. *South School Site 13. Dead Plant Replacement 14. Greenwaste Reduction 15. Baseball/S'ball Fld Maint. 16. Sand Play Areas 17. Trash Pick Up 18. Restroom Maintenance thb/aJandbid1doc Y The cost of the past 3 year contract for parks maintenance is as follows: ORIGINAL YEAR CONTRACT ADDENDUM* TOTAL 91-92 $ 92,226 -0- $ 92,226 92-93 $92,226 $ 10,800 $103,026 93-94 $98,316 $ 10,800 $109,116 *Restroom maintenance and trash pick up in park system increased to 7 days a week. The results of the current Landscape Contract bids are as follows and include all applicable fees and taxes. Contractor Fiscal Year Bid Amount 3 1/2 Yr Total Landscape West, Inc. 94-95 (Jan - June) $ 40,680.00 95-96 94,920.00 96-97 96,816.00 97-98 98,748.00 $ 331,164.00 Van Herricks 94-95 (Jan - June) $ 54,600.00 95-96 115,200.00 96-97 118,080.00 97-98 121,020.00 $ 408,900.00 Bennett Enterprises 94-95 (Jan - June) $ 46,783.00 95-96 124,010.00 96-97 124,010.00 97-98 124,010.00 $ 418,813.00 Toyo Landscaping Co. 94-95 (Jan - June) $ 54,185.00 95-96 130,370.00 96-97 130,370.00 97-98 130,370.00 $ 445,295.00 California Companies 94-95 (Jan - June) $ 53,400.00 95-96 126,000.00 96-97 132,000.00 97-98 138,000.00 $ 449,400.00 Golden Bear Arborist 94-95 (Jan - June) $ 54,683.99 95-96 140,696.80 96-97 140,696.80 97-98 163,408.78 $499,486.37 Landscape West, Inc. is the lowest bidder by $77,736 and even with two additional parks, is $50,742 less than their current rate over a 3 1/2 year period. 2 thb/a1andbid1doc A The current proposed contract is scheduled to run from January 1, 1995 through June 30, 1998 and at the option of the City Council, with the consent of the contractor, the contract may be renewable for a period not to exceed three years. Staff also received bids for landscape maintenance of the City's medians. The low bid total for a 3 1/2 year period was $117,572. Staff will review this area at a later time when there is sufficient time for an overall evaluation of the City's ability to pay for this additional service. Alternatives: Another alternative available to Council is: 1. To choose another bidder. Fiscal Impact: The FY 94-95 appropriation made from the Street Lighting and Landscaping District Fund to the General Fund for this purpose could be reduced by the $13,889 savings (if unspent) as shown below. APPROPRIATION TOTAL COST TOTAL SAVINGS $ 109,127 $95,238 $13,889.00 Respectfully submitted, Concur: Homayoun Behboodi Amy A Irani C.I.P. Engineer Directo of Public Works NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Steve B rr II City Manager Viki Copeland Director of Finance thb/a:landbidldoc A4,t-f� �;Y-_571 -5r /O)j -s/-9/ December 7, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council December 13, 1994 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SANGRIA RESTAURANT, 68 PIER AVENUE PURPOSE:. TO REVIEW THE RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SANGRIA RESTAURANT AT 68 PIER AVENUE Recommendation Review and approve the resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit for 68 Pier Avenue for on -sale liquor, extended hours, and entertainment. The attached resolution sustains the decision of the Planning Commission but modifies the conditions, pursuant to City Council action at the November 22, 1994 meeting. CONCUR: Stephen R. ell City Manager y/ccrs68cv Sol Blumenfel Community D elopment Director 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, UPON RECONSIDERATION, TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR A RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE BEER AND WINE TO INCLUDE FULL ALCOHOL, EXTENDED HOURS UNTIL 2:00 A.M. AND ANCILLARY DANCING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AT 68 PIER AVENUE. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on November 22, 1994, to reconsider the Planning Commission's decision to approve the subject conditional use permit amendment and to consider oral and written testimony on the matter, and; WHEREAS the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the conditional use permit amendment at their meeting of October 18, 1994, and approved the request subject to conditions as contained in Planning Commission Resolution 94-30, and; WHEREAS after considering the decision of the Planning Commission, and the testimony at the public hearing, the City Council generally agrees with the Planning Commission, and agrees with findings of the Planning Commission as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 94-30, which are incorporated herein by reference, and; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to modify some of the conditions as imposed by the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, UPON RECONSIDERATION, TO GRANT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW ON -SALE ALCOHOL, EXTENDED HOURS TO 2:00 A.M. DAILY, AND ANCILLARY LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AND DANCING AT 68 PIER AVENUE, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS WHICH MODIFY AND SUPERSEDE THE CONDITIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 94-30 SECTION I Specific Conditions of Approval The project shall be substantially consistent with submitted plans. Modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. A. Final plans for the store front improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to their implementation. Additionally elevations shall be submitted for approval for the rear of the building 1 1 2. The primary emphasis of the business shall be maintained as a restaurant. Live 2 entertainment and dancing shall be secondary. 3 A. The area set aside for live entertainment and dancing shall be as shown on plans and shall not exceed 200 square feet. The main dining area which extends from the 4 front of the restaurant to the front of the kitchen area shall remain as seating for restaurant purposes at all times. 5 3. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 8:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M. daily. 6 4. Dancing shall be limited to between the hours of 9:00 P.M. and 1:30 A.M. 7 If entertainment is to include amplified live entertainment, an acoustical study shall be 8 reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and shall be implemented 9 in the building. 10 a. Management shall be responsible for maintaining music/entertainment volumes at reasonable levels. 11 b. During any live entertainment and/or dancing, the exterior doors and windows shall 12 remain closed. 13 5. All exterior glass windows or doors shall be equipped with double -pane glass or a comparable substitute with equivalent sound dampening properties to the satisfaction of the 14 Community Development Director. 15 6. There shall be a review of the operation of the new restaurant 6 months after its opening 16 date. ' 17 SECTION II General operating and standard conditions: 18 1. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial 19 establishments nearby. 2. The business shall provide adequate staffing, management and supervisory techniques to 2 0 prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business, 21 �andin4he-parig-areas. 22 3. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the city's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods, 23 and/or commercial establishments. Noise emanating from the property shall be monitored six months from the date of the operation of the new restaurant to verify compliance with 24 the noise ordinance, and thereafter periodically or in response to any complaints. 25 4. A manager or employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall 26 be on the premises during business hours. a. The conditional use permit conditions shall be placed on the property in a location 2 7 where employees can easily read the conditions. 28 5. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists, and may authorize 29 the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem, and then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will automatically initiate a review of this conditional use permit by the Commission. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 6. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained ; free of graffiti at all times. 7. Any significant changes to the interior layout which would alter the primary function of the restaurant shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 8. This conditional use permit is issued exclusively for and as long as the premises remains a restaurant; a minimum of fifty (50) percent of the total gross sales, computed monthly, shall result from the sale of prepared food. The city shall have the right during business hours upon 15 days notice to inspect the books and records of the applicant to determine the gross sales of food and/or the gross sales of alcoholic beverages. Upon request at the time the City inspects the books and records of the applicant, the applicant shall also submit to the City copies of all records submitted to the State Board of Equalization for purposes of computing sales tax. Applicant gives the right to the City to review the records of the State Board of Equalization for the purpose of verifying the applicants books and records, with the understanding that these reviews are confidential. 9. Any violation of the•conditions of approval and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be grounds for a public hearing for revocation of the conditional use permit. 10. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. SECTION III This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed a the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid an enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this,permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19., 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions: SECTION IV The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 1 ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1994 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4 CITY ATTORNEY Planning Commission approval; said the applicant would run a quality business; George Dispotes - Manhattan Beach, suggested using an automated system to record decibel levels; and, Michael Stifano - 1704 Loma Drive, stated that requiring measures to abate noise when there is no evidence that there will be noise is ridiculous; said to just allow a business to come into the area and if a problem arises to deal with it at that time; and that if there is no market for the business being offered, it will go away, if there is a market the business will be successful. The public hearing closed at 8:50 P.M. City Attorney Vose said that the issue of an entertainment permit was not on tonights agenda and would have to come back on a subsequent agenda. action: To direct staff to place the issue of an entertainment permit on the agenda of the Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994. Motion Mayor Benz, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Furtbei Action: To sustain the Planning Commission approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the following changes to the conditions outlined in the Planning commission resolution: 1) Section I, Item 2, first paragraph, delete all words after, "Live entertainment and dancing shall be secondary." 2) Section I, Item 4, second paragraph, delete all verbiage except, "If entertainment is to include amplified entertainment and/or more musicians, an acoustical study shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and shall be implemented in the building."; 3) Section II, delete Item 4; and, 4) Section II, delete Item 6, and return the item to the City Council. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To direct staff to review all applicable City Code sections that pertain to conditions imposed on restaurants and bars in order to determine which can be applied as standard conditions and to return the list for Council consideration. Motion Bowler, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 11-22-94 Page 8675 Honorable Mayor Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: Monthly Meeting of the City Planning Commission December 7, 1994, Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 PURPOSE: To Initiate a Monthly Meeting Schedule of the City Planning Commission INITIATED BY STAFF Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution approving monthly meetings for the City Planning Commission to commence in January 1995. Background: On September 16, 1994, the City Planning Commission approved a temporary alternative meeting schedule to conduct monthly Planning Commission meetings on a trial basis. Following review of the temporary meeting schedule, on December 6, 1994 the City Planning Commission approved a permanent monthly meeting schedule. :In order to facilitate a focus on program implementation, the Planning Commission .approved monthly meetings in response to a reduced case load. The former time delegated to Planning Commission agenda production has been consolidated more efficiently into a monthly agenda and enabled staff time to be reprogrammed for other activities. Toward these ends, the Department has prepared Division workprograms for for implementation of the Downtown Improvement Plan and other Department projects. Analysis: Pursuant to Resolution 86-4961, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, establishes the dates for holding regular meetings of the City Council and the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may temporarily change its regular meeting dates, as needs arise. In order to fulfill the requirements of Resolution 86-4961, the City Council must approve the Planning Commission regular meeting schedule. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution approving monthly meetings for the City Planning Commission on the third Tuesday of each month commencing in January 1995. 1'P Sol Blumenfeld, Director Community Development Concur: "V A/ Steve Burall, City Manager Attachments 1. Resolution 86-4961 2. Resolution sb/plancom PA Y 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 86- 4961 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE DATES FOR HOLDING REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AND REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach must establish regular meeting dates pursuant to the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beac must establish meeting dates pursuant to the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the establishment of said council and planning meeting times shall be done in a manner so as to prevent conflicts between the two bodies for use of the designated meeting places; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to make consistent the location of alternative meeting sites and wishes to establish th Hermosa Beach Community Center at 710 Pier Avenue as the alternative location for regular meetings of the Hermosa Beach. Planning Commission; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month in the meeting place established by Section 2-2 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. 4/RESO3 1 2 Y 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 86- 4961 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE DATES FOR HOLDING REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AND REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach must establish regular meeting dates pursuant to the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beac must establish meeting dates pursuant to the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the establishment of said council and planning meeting times shall be done in a manner so as to prevent conflicts between the two bodies for use of the designated meeting places; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to make consistent the location of alternative meeting sites and wishes to establish th Hermosa Beach Community Center at 710 Pier Avenue as the alternative location for regular meetings of the Hermosa Beach. Planning Commission; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month in the meeting place established by Section 2-2 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. 4/RESO3 11 12 1141 14 75 ]6 17 ]8 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 C Section 2. That the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold its regular meetings on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at the City Council Chambers in th City of Hermosa Beach. Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Hermosa Bear may change its meeting place for whatever purpose by resolution of the City Council. Section 4. That the City Council of the City of Hermosa Bead hereby delegates to the Planning Commission the ability to chanc_ its regular meeting dates, as needs arise, by resolution of the Planning Commission, except, however, the Planning Commission me not permanently change the date of its regular meetings without the prior approval of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach by resolution. As used in this section, temporary changes in meetings scheduled by the Planning Commission shall consist o changes which last for a period of -one month or less. Section 5. That the alternative location for the regular meeting of the Planning Commission shall be in the Hermosa Beach Community Center, 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. Said alternative location shall be used for such regular meeting! only during such times as the City Hall Council Chambers are not available. To notify t-rio nio i ; ,. -,c ,... L _L _ _ __ _ _ alternative location shall be placed on the entrance of the City Hall Council Chambers notifying the public of the alternative location at least 24 hours prior to the date and time for any regular Planning Commission meeting. I// /RES03 4 " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING MONTHLY MEETINGS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, City Council Resolution 86-4961 requires that the City Council approve by resolution any changes in Planning Commission meetings that extended over one month; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has proposed changing its meetings to once a month as case load permits. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve one Planning Commission meeting a month to be held the third Tuesday of each month. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 11994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: y\c:ccrsmtg CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -5- �,; >-,// -� �/? y November 28, 1994 City Council Meeting December 13, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 94-1122 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PENAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 94-1122, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of November 22, 1994, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and introduced by the following vote: AYES: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Elaine Doerfling, City Jerk Noted: N,�� Stephen R. Bu ke 1, City Manager 21 IN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 is 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO 94-1122 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING THE PENAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING STANDARDS OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS WHEREAS, Penal Code Section 13510 has been amended to require the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) to establish minimum selection and training standards for local public safety dispatchers, and WHEREAS, The Commission adopted these standards as part of a voluntary Public Safety Dispatcher Program and these standards became law effective January 1, 1989, and WHEREAS, All local agencies that are now in the POST peace officer program are eligible to participate in the Public Safety Dispatcher Program and will be reimbursed for certain dispatcher training costs only if they participate in the dispatcher program. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain the following: SECTION 1. The City of Hermosa Beach, California declares that it desires to qualify to receive aid from the State of California under the provisions of Section 13522, Chapter 1, of Title 4, Part 4, of the California Penal Code. SECTION 2. Pursuant to Section 13510(c), Chapter 1. the Hermosa Beach Police Department will adhere to standards for recruitment and training established by the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST). SECTION 3. Pursuant to Section 13512, Chapter 1, the Commission and its representatives may make such inquiries as deemed appropriate by the Commission to ascertain that the Hermosa Beach Police Department public safety dispatcher personnel adhere to standards for selection and training established by the Commission on -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Peace Officer Standards and Training. _ SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 5. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adapted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK -2- APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 94-7 INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL December 7, 1994 Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD TATTOO PARLORS TO THE PERMITTED USE LIST FOR C-3 ZONE Background This item was considered by the Planning Commission on November 15, 1994. The resolution was not approved and will be reconsidered at next regularly scheduled meeting of January 17, 1995. The item has been noticed but cannot be acted upon by City Council until the Planning Commission has issued a final recommendation. Disposition That the City Council receive and file this report pending final recommendation by the City Planning Commission. CONCUR: Stephen R. B rr City Manager y\c:ccstatto "roftgume Community evelopment Director L! Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 94-8 INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL December 5, 1994 Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 PURPOSE: TO ELIMINATE THE NEED TO ADOPT RESOLUTIONS OF INTENT PRIOR TO AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND/OR MAP Recommendation Introduce attached ordinance eliminating resolutions of intent for amending the zoning ordinance, and/or map. Background At the meeting of November 15, 1994, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending eliminating resolutions of intent. At the City Council regular meeting of September 13, 1994, a resolution of intent to amend the zoning ordinance to eliminate the requirement to adopt such resolutions was approved. Analysis In the past, State law required resolutions of intent; it no longer does. Therefore, staff believes the process for amending the zoning ordinance would be expedited if this part of the process was eliminated. Adequate preliminary notice to amend the ordinance would still be provided through dialogue, agendizing and the minutes of any public meeting held by the Planning Commission or City Council. All other public notice requirements including publishing in the newspaper 10 days prior to any public hearing on an amendment will remain status quo. CONCUR: Sol Blumenfe Community D velopment Director Stephen R. NIrre 1 City Manag Michael Schubach Planning Director y/pcsrreso 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94- 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND 3 SECTION 1501(2) AND (3), INITIATION OF AMENDMENT, TO ELIMINATE THE 4 REQUIREMENT OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND/OR MAP. 5 6 WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on December 13, 1994, and 7 considered oral and written testimony and made the following findings: 8 A. The State does not require a resolution of intent; 9 10 B. Adequate public notice through dialogue, minutes, and agendizing of issues before the 11 Planning Commission and City Council are adequate preliminary public notice of pending 12 amendments to the zoning ordinance or map; 13 C. Public notice prior to any public hearing to amend the ordinance, or map will remain status 14 15 quo. 16 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: 17 18 SECTION 1. Amend Section 1501(2) and 1501(3), Initiation of Amendments to read as follows: 19 "(2) Direction by the City Council' "(3) Direction by the Planning Commission" 20 SECTION 2. Amend Section 1503 to read as follows: 21 22 "Upon filing of a verified application for an amendment, or the- deptien e€ a reseltifien of intention direction by the Planning Commission or the City Council, 23 the Planning Commission shall hold one public hearing thereon, and notice of such 24 hearing shall be given as provided in Article 16 of this ordinance." 25 SECTION 3. Amend Section 1504 to read as follows: 26 "The hearing for an amendment to the land -use plan hereby established shall be 27 held not later than forty days following the filing of an application for such 28 29 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 amendment or direction by the Planning Commission or the City Council." SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and in be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 5. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which thq same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of y\c: ccorreso 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California — ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 3 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 10. TEXT 94-8 -- TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF INTENT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION OR CITY COUNCIL INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said text amendment. Mr. Schubach said Staff believed the process for amending the zoning ordinance would be expedited, with adequate preliminary notice to amend the ordinance still being provided. Chmn. Dettelbach opened the Public Hearing at 9:56 p.m. No one wished to speak, and Chmn Dettelbach closed the Public Hearing at 9:56 p.m. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Merl, to APPROVE Staff's recommendation AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl, Tucker, Chmn. Dettelbach NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 12. GP 94-2 -- URTH QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT: T MEND THE CIRCUL ION ELEMENT TO RE-ROUTE THE COASTA IKE PATH FROM 24TH STR T TO NORTH CITY BOUNDARY. Staff Recommended Action. o set for public hearing. Mr. Schubach stated this item was at the direc ' n of the City ouncil. Staff had no recommended amendments, but would take direction from the Pla ing mmission. MOTION by Chmn. Dettelbach, Seconded by C rfim. Merl, DIRECT Staff to set this item for a Public Hearing. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, arks, Merl, Tucker, Chmn. Dettelba NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 13.a -Memorandum regarding clarification of mixes uses. Page )t+ PC Minutes 11-15-94 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1s 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION P.C. 94-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONMSSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING SECTION 1501(2) AND (3), INITIATION OF AMENDMENT, TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND/OR MAP. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public meeting on November 15, 1994, and considered oral and written testimony and made the following findings: A. The state does not require a resolution of intent; B. Adequate public notice through dialogue, minutes, and agendizing of issues before the Planning Commission and City Council are adequate preliminary public notice of pending amendments to the zoning ordinance or map; C. Public notice prior to any public hearing to amend the ordinance, or map will remain status quo. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, recommends that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: Section 1 Amend Section 1501(2) and 1501(3), Initiation of Amendments to read as follows: "(2) Direction by the City Council" "(3) Direction by the Planning Commission" Section 2 Amend Section 1503 to read as follows: "Upon filing of a verified application for an amendment, or the adeptie of eselutien e f intentie direction by the Planning Commission or the City Council, the Planning Commission shall hold one public hearing thereon, and notice of such hearing shall be given as provided in Article 16 of this ordinance." Section 3 Amend Section 1504 to read as follows: "The hearing for an amendment to the land -use plan hereby established shall be held not later than forty days following the filing of an application for such S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 amendment or the passage of a .e„elutienf ' ti direction by the Planning V l 111C1i11L7VZI Commission or the City Council." VOTE: AYES: Comms.Di Monda,Marks,Merl, Tucker, Chmn.Dettelbach NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 94-34 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of November 15, 1994. y:persreso ..�'w��—Idj Secretary Date i Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 94-8 INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL September 28, 1994 Regular Meeting of November 15, 1994 PURPOSE: TO ELIMINATE THE NEED TO ADOPT RESOLUTIONS OF INTENT PRIOR TO AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND/OR MAP Recommendation Adopt attached resolution eliminating resolution of intent for amending the zoning ordinance, and/or map. Background At the City Council regular meeting of September 13, 1994, a resolution of intent to amend the zoning ordinance to eliminate the requirement to adopt such resolutions was approved. Analysis In the past, state law required resolutions of intent; it no longer does. Therefore, staff believes the process for amending the zoning ordinance would be expedited, if this part of the process was eliminated. Adequate preliminary notice to amend the ordinance would still be provided through dialogue, agendizing and the minutes of any public meeting held by the Planning Commission or City Council. All other public notice requirements including publishing in the newspaper 10 days prior to any public hearing on an amendment will remain status quo. CONCUR: Sol B umenfIvelopment Community Director y/pcsrreso chael Sc`hubach Planning Director ,o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION 94- 5704 A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HER�NIOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO INITIATE STUDY AND CONSIDERATION OF A TENT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR RESOLUTIONS OF INTENT TO INITIATE TEXT AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on September 13, 1994, to consider initiating a study to eliminate the requirement for the Planning Commission or City Council to adopt a resolution to initiate text amendments and made a following findings: A. Section 1501 of the zoning ordinance regarding "initiation of amendment" states that amendments may only be initiated by resolution of intention by the City Council or the Planning Commission; B. This procedural step requires that the resolution be placed on the agenda for discussion and the preparation of a resolution which delays the actual implementation of desired amendments, and thus may be an extra unnecessary step that should be eliminated; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY INITIATE A STUDY AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR RESOLUTION OF NT rQTINITIATE TEXT AMENDMENTS. J7 1. PASSED, ED this 13 tray of Se2tembez , 1994, PRESIDENT of the City Cp cel and,\ AYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: 41,�AZ Al- CITY ATTORNEY H/ccrsint Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 26, MAY 10 AND AUGUST, 9, 1994) Decerriber 6, 1994 Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-6 AND TEXT AMENDMENT PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 13, NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commission Recommendation: To introduce the attached ordinance amending Article 13 as previously recommended by the City Council, modified to include the elimination of the current Section 13-8, Nonconforming Historic Structures. A Itarn ativP Introduce the attached ordinance without the Commission suggested modification (i.e. keep the current Section 13-8 renumbered to 13-7). Back -ground: At the meeting of August 9; 1994, the City Council was satisfied with the amendments as presented by staff, which incorporated previous comments from the Council. These amendments were then referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation, as they substantially modified the original recommendation of the Commission. The Planning Commission, at their meetings of September 6 and October 18, considered the amendments of the Council, and supports their approval. However, the Commission is recommending one additional modification to eliminate Section 13-8 with respect to Nonconforming Historic Structures. For further background please refer to the previous reports and attachments. Analysis: As previously discussed some of the reasons for the proposed amendments are as follows: • To organize in a more concise and easily understood format • Simplification and clarification, with details to be handled by subsequent policies 16. established by resolution • To eliminate distinctions between residential, commercial, and industrial nonconforming uses and buildings. (The current ordinance provides for opportunities for expansion of nonconforming residential uses and buildings but not commercial or industrial.) Otherwise, the proposed changes do not significantly alter current rules which allow continuation and maintenance of legal nonconforming uses and structures, and limited expansion and remodeling. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS The Commission's only suggested modification to the Council's proposed amendments is the elimination of Section 13-8. This section was not previously considered for change by either the Commission or Council. This suggestion is included in italics in the attached ordinance. Section 13-8 allows deviations from the standards of Article 13 to preserve locally recognized historic buildings or structures. The Commission expressed concern that the use of the C.U.P. process to grant such exceptions could become arbitrary, since the City has not adopted a certified list of historic buildings. The Commission further stated that the "List of Locally Significant Historic Resources" as contained in the Land Use Element, while based on research by the Historical society, is not adequate because the list is not complete, nor is it based on architectural merit. ADDED CHANGES SINCE 8/9/94 Please note the added changes in the draft ordinance, Section 13-2, to incorporate the Council's previous comments of August 9, and some added suggestions for further clarification. These are summarized as follows: SECTION 13-2 A(2b) and B(2b): The term "extended" replaced "continued" in reference to extending nonconforming side yards, as directed by Council A(2a) and B(2a): Added statement specifying that replacement cost based on building valuation data provided by the ICBG, and remodeling cost computed at the 50% of the value for new construction. As directed by Council 8/9/94 A(2a) and B(2a): "excluding any expansion that has occurred since October 26, 1989, was added after "50%(100%) of the current replacement cost...". This is necessary to prevent circumvention of the ordinance through "piece -meal" expansions done on a periodic basis. The date refers to the adoption of the ordinance in 1989 that established the 50% and 100% expansion rules. C.: This sub -section added to state that policies, procedures, and fees for implementing this section (including fees and procedures for projects requiring Planning Commission approval) will be established by Resolution of the City Council. 2 With respect to the policies, procedures and fees that needed to be established to implement these amendments, a resolution will be provided for consideration at the next meeting when the ordinance is considered for adoption. — Ken Robertson Associate Planner CONCUR: 2:ym-� - Sol Blumenf d Com unity evelopment Director Steptanager R. urrell City Attachments 1. Proposed Ordinance for introduction 2. Draft summary table to be used as handout 3. P.C. Minutes/Staff Reports 4. List of "Locally Significant Historic Resources" in the L.U.P. 5. City Council Minutes 8/9/94 KR/ccsmon 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ORDINANCE 94 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND PORTIONS OF ARTICLE 13 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, IN REGARDS TO NONCONFORMING USES AND BUILDINGS, FOR PURPOSES OF CLARIFICATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearings on April 12, April 26, May 10, August 9, and December 13, 1994 to consider the recommendations and comments of the Planning Commission to amend portions of Article 13 and to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Rules regarding the allowable remodeling and expansions to nonconforming uses and buildings need clarification and simplification to be better understood and universally applied and to minimize ambiguity and confusion; B. The same rules and regulations should apply to all nonconforming uses and buildings whether residential, commercial, or industrial; B. The proposed amendments are exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because the proposed amendments are for clarification purposes only and there is no possibility they may have a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby ordains that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Article 13, through Section 13-4 to read as follows: q 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 "Section 13-0. General Goals The goals of the City Council related to the nonconformity that exists throughout the city as a result of zone changes and ordinance amendments is as follows: • To allow buildings, whether they are occupied by a nonconforming use or nonconforming to zoning standards, to remain and be maintained, and to allow some limited alteration and expansion of said buildings when certain criteria are met. • To encourage restoration and maintenance of historical residential buildings • To encourage the use of the ordinance to meet current and future minimum standards of parking, open space, setbacks, height, etc. • To limit remodeling and expansion of buildings which by current standards are exceptionally undersized, dilapidated, significantly overdense, or do not meet minimal standards for parking and setback. 13-1, Continuance and Maintenance The nonconforming use of a building may be continued, provided any structural alteration or expansion shall comply with Section 13-2 below. When a use which is nonconforming to the use regulations for the district where it is located is vacated or discontinued for ninety (90) consecutive days or more, the nonconforming use will be deemed abandoned, and any future use of such building shall conform to the provisions of the zone in which it is located. A nonconforming structure may be maintained and the use therein continued, provided any structural alteration or expansion shall comply with Section 13-2 below. Routine maintenance and repairs, enlargement of window and door openings, repairs and/or replacement to plumbing, electrical wiring, and that required by law or similar work as determined by the Community Development Director, shall not be considered structural alterations, and may be performed on a nonconforming structure. 13-2. Expansion, remodeling, and alteration Buildings containing nonconforming uses, and nonconforming buildings are subject to the following standards: S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A. Buildings containing nonconforming uses 1. Structural Removal allowed: a) Roofs may be removed to add additional stories; b) A maximum of 10% of linear feet of exterior walls and 10% of floor area may be removed; c) Planning Commission approval is required to remove more than specified above. 2. Expansion/Alteration allowed: a) Maximum of 50% of the current replacement cost of the existing building(s) excluding any expansion that has occurred after October 26, 1989 (Replacement cost based on building valuation data provided by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBG), with remodeling computed at 50% of the value for new construction) b) Expansion not permitted if residential density exceeds 45 units per acre c) Expansion must conform to current codes (except existing nonconfonning side yards may be extended if within 10% of current side yard standard) d) For buildings nonconforming to current parking requirements, refer to Section 1162 e) Any garage expansion for parking shall not be included in the allowed expansion B. Nonconforming buildings 1. Structural Removal allowed: a) Roofs may be removed to add additional stories b) Up to 30% of existing linear feet of exterior walls and 30% of floor area c) Planning Commission approval required to remove more than specified above 2. Expansion/Remodel allowed: a) Up to 100% expansion/remodel of the current replacement cost of the existing building(s) excluding any expansion that has occurred after October 26, 1989. Greater than 50% up to 100% requires Planning Commission approval. (Replacement cost based on building valuation data provided by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBG), with remodeling computed at 50% of the value for new construction). b) Expansion must conform to current codes_ (except existing nonconforming side yards may be extended if within 10% of si yard standard) c) Existing nonconforming side yards may be continued and extended subject to Planning Commission approval `�, fV w,;,,� /� in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 d) For buildings nonconforming to current parking requirements, refer to Section 1162 e Any garage expansion for parking shall not be included in the allowed expansion C. olicies, procedures and fees for issue g building permits, a=ndotions requiring Planning Commission approval subject to this section, shall be established by resolution of the City Council Section 13-3 Nonconforming use limits other uses While a nonconforming use exists on any lot, and it is the only use on the lot, no new use may be established thereon even though such other use would be a conforming use. While a nonconforming use occupies a portion of a lot or building with multiple uses no new use may be established within that portion of the lot or building which the existing nonconforming use occupies." " SECTION 2. Delete Section 13-7 SECTION 3. Delete Section 13-8 SECTION 4. Amend the following definitions in the Definition section of the zoning ordinance to read as follows: Sec. 239. Nonconforming building, or structure. "Nonconforming building" means a building, structure, or portion thereof, which was lawfully erected or altered and maintained, but which no longer conforms to the zoning standards of the zone in which it is located." Sec. 240. Nonconforming use. "Nonconforming use" means a use which was lawfully established and maintained but which, no longer conforms to the use regulations, or the lot area per dwelling unit regulations, of the zone in which it is located." SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective and in be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 i8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage. and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. h:ccrsnon PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 21994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ris-c3ninn i or uie t.try L ouncii aria iviA Y vtc of me t.ity or Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY N li SUMMARY NONCONFORMING PROVISIONS FOR EXPANSION AND REMODELING OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (EXISTING AND PROPOSED ORDINANCE) Nonconforming Structures No ParkingI 1 Parking Space I 2 Parking Spaces Per Unit Per Unit Nonconforming Uses No ParkingI 1 Parking Space I 2 Parking Spaces Per Unit Per Unit *Expansion Allowed: 100 square feet 250 square feet 50% Roofs, to add additional stories Structural Removal Allowed: 10% of linear feet of exterior walls and 10% of floor area Any more requires Planning Commission approval Extension of Walls With Allowed if within 10% of current side yard standard Nonconforming Side Yards: * Garage expansions not included "Nonconforming Building" means a building, structure, or portion thereof, which was lawfully erected or altered and maintained, but no longer conforms to the zoning standards of the zone of in which it is located. "Nonconforming Use" means a use which was lawfully established and maintained but which, no longer conforms to the use regulations, or the lot area per dwelling unit regulations, of the zone in which it is located. Minimum parking stall sizes: • Existing garages: 8 1/2 X 18 Feet • New garages: 8 1/2 X 20 Feet ifi 50% by right *Expansion Allowed: 100 square feet 250 square feet 50% to 100% w/ Planning Commission approval Roofs, to add additional stories Structural Removal Allowed: 30% of linear feet of exterior walls and 30% of floor area Any more requires Planning Commission approval Allowed if within 10% of current side yard standard Extension of Walls With Nonconforming Side Yards: Allowed if 75% of block has same nonconformity Or, may be allowed by Planning Commission if found logical Nonconforming Uses No ParkingI 1 Parking Space I 2 Parking Spaces Per Unit Per Unit *Expansion Allowed: 100 square feet 250 square feet 50% Roofs, to add additional stories Structural Removal Allowed: 10% of linear feet of exterior walls and 10% of floor area Any more requires Planning Commission approval Extension of Walls With Allowed if within 10% of current side yard standard Nonconforming Side Yards: * Garage expansions not included "Nonconforming Building" means a building, structure, or portion thereof, which was lawfully erected or altered and maintained, but no longer conforms to the zoning standards of the zone of in which it is located. "Nonconforming Use" means a use which was lawfully established and maintained but which, no longer conforms to the use regulations, or the lot area per dwelling unit regulations, of the zone in which it is located. Minimum parking stall sizes: • Existing garages: 8 1/2 X 18 Feet • New garages: 8 1/2 X 20 Feet ifi ]BACKUROPUND MATERIAL i No one else wished to (.ik, and Chmn. Dettelbach closed the Hb, .ng at 9.28 p.m. MOTION by Comm. Merl, Seconded by Comm. Marks, to APPROVE this request for an off premise mural at 1238 Hermosa Avenue. AYES: Comms. Marks, Merl, Tucker, Chmn. Dettelbach NOES: None ABSENT: Comm. Di Monda ABSTAIN: None 12. SS 93-8 PART II -- SPECIAL STUDY REGARDING THE STANDARD AND TYPICAL CONDITIONS IMPOSED ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS (continued from July 19 and September 20, 1994 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: To forward to City Council for review and approval. Mr. Schubach stated this was phase two of the special study of CUP and 'permitted uses within the zoning ordinance. Staff requested input as to the study information provided. MOTION by Comm. Merl, Seconded by Comm. Tucker, to FORWARD to City Council this Special Study, with return of this document to the Commission as an initiated ordinance. AYES: Comms. Marks, Merl, Tucker, Chmn. Dettelbach NOES: None ABSENT: Comm. Di Monda ABSTAIN: None r 14.a Submittal of historical designation list in relation to nonconforming buildings and uses study for Planning Commission review and comment. Director Blumenfeld said there had been a question about the historic designation section. After review, Staff recommended striking the section referencing historic structures and move forward with the proposed amendment text previously approved by the Commission. By Straw Vote, Staff's recommendation was APPROVED (4/0), with instructions the document be corrected and brought back to the Commission for final approval. 14.b Memorandum to review Downtown Implementation Plan in jointPlanning Commission and Downtown Enhancement Commission meeting. Director Blumenfeld stated the Downtown Enhancement Commission had invited the Planning Commission to attend a presentation scheduled on November 2, 1994. MOTION by Comm. Tucker, Seconded by Comm. Merl, to place on the agenda consideration of participation in the joint meeting with the Downtown Enhancement Commission. Motion was unanimously APPROVED. Page 10 PC Minutes 10-18-94 Alana Lagerhausen, applicant, 727 Longfellow Ave., requested a continuance in order to modify plans, explaining she wished to change the upper unit to a more comfortable owner's unit. No one else wished -to -speak on this subject. MOTION by Comm. Tucker, Sec nd d by Comm. Dettelbac , to CONTINUE this item to the meeting of September 20, 1994, a>DiMonda, m revised p al ns and a longitudinal study were to be presented. AYES: Comms. Dette ach, Marks, Tucker, C �Merl. NOES: None ABSENT: one ABSTAIN None 9. SS 93-6 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 13 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES (referred back from August 9, 1994 City Council). Staff Recommended Action: To review and comment. Planning Director Schubach stated the proposal regarded nonconforming ordinances, based upon Council's input, is to simplify the text and provide equal treatment for commercial and residential structures. The termite inspection and method of calculating cost have been removed. He requested the Commission's comments. Cost calculation will be based upon the ICBG. Chmn. Merl invited public comment relating to this item at 7:48 p.m. Betty Ryan, Monterey Ave., referencing historical buildings, requested the Commission "think long and hard" prior to telling property owners what they can and cannot do with their properties. No one wished to speak on this subject. Chmn. Merl closed the Hearing at 7:52 p.m. Comm. Di Monda commented that previously a list was attempted to be made, resulting in one historical building. He felt, for political reasons, a lot of time had been spent on this subject, which was a waste of taxpayers' money. He felt no reference to historical buildings should be made unless those buildings were identified, with a criteria established, in order to stop any abuse to take place through the political process. Mr. Schubach responded that during the Land Use Element, such buildings were identified. Comm. Di Monda requested a list of historical building to be discussed in open forum. He suggested the goal line item, page 3, be excluded until such a list is presented and approved. He felt the goal was worthwhile, but identification was necessary to eliminate the abuse potential. Responding to Ms. Ryan, he said the Commission was suggesting that all property rights would be retained. In addition, if the building has historical value, the property owner would be 'allowed to maintain the building in such a state even though nonconformities did exist. Page I I PC Minutes tes 9-6-94 By unanimous consent, the Commission REFERRED this item back to Staff. W.A. Election of the new Chairman and Vice Chairman Motion 'Was made by Comm. Di Monda, seconded by Chmn. Merl, to Dettelbach as Chairman. Motion was unanimously APPROVED. Motion was made,by Comm. Dettelbach, seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to Tucker as Vice Chairman. Motion was unanimously APPROVED. / ina Comm. ate Comm. 10.b. Memorandum regarding proposal to initiate monthly Plannin Commission meetings. After discussion, the consensus of the Commission was, on a tri asis, to conduct one meeting during the months of October, November and December 199 . However, if the calendar is such that the meetings become extended or anyapplications can t be heard in a timely manner, two meetings per month will immediately be reactivated. objections, so ordered. Director Blumenfeld stated Staff would return to\tb� Commission with a Condition Action. 10.c. Memorandum regarding the Planning , o I issi Implementation Plan - stakeholders meeting. Receive and File 10.d. Tentative future Planning C mmission agenda. attendance at the Downtown Comm. Di Monda discuss7d with Mr. Schubach the application for a Variance at Comm. Di Monda note$`Ahis was the type of "deals" the community made with F "cut down the trees a?d come back asking for a 25 -feet sign". He suggested the review Mr. Bacon's. se of City parking. Receive and File F' / 10.e. City Council minutes of July 26, 1994. Receive and File Page 11 Bacon: f4ssion C Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission August 30, 1994 Regular Meeting of September 6, 1994 (REFERRED BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-6 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 13, NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation: Review and comment on the attached draft ordinance, which significantly modifies the original recommendation of the Planning Commission. Background: At their meeting of August 9, 1994, the City Council approved a modified ordinance for referral to the Planning Commission. The ordinance was prepared based the direction of the Council for staff to prepare a more concise and simplified ordinance. Also, the Council requested that it include provisions that would allow expansion of nonconforming commercial structures as well as residential structures. Previously the Council considered amendments recommended by the Planning Commission which were not adopted due to concerns about commercial buildings, and about the overall complexity of the ordinance. For further background please refer to the previous reports and attachments. Analysis: Attached is the draft ordinance tentatively accepted by Council. It is intended to be simpler and more concise than the current ordinance while generally containing the same rules and regulations. The focus of this study has been the regulations for expansion and alteration of nonconforming buildings which currently are located in Sections 13-2, 13-3, and 13-7. These provisions are proposed to be consolidated into Section 13-1 and 13-2 in a more concise 9 13 format. Further, the provisions dot not make any distinction between residential and commercial buildings and uses. Unless noted, the rest of the Sections of Article 13 are not proposed for change and would simply be renumbered. The most notable change in the basic substance of the ordinance is that there would no longer be separate treatment of commercial/industrial structures and residential structures. This is consistent with the direction of the Council to give nonconforming commercial buildings the same opportunity for expansion and alteration as is given to residential buildings, and would remove a regulatory barrier to improvement of some existing downtown buildings. Buildings nonconforming to parking requirements are dealt with in Section 1162 of the zoning code which was recently amended by the Council, and is pending approval by the Coastal Commission. In order to make the ordinance simpler, many of the more detailed and specific requirements have been made less onerous or have been completely removed (for example, the requirement for termite inspection has been removed, as have the specific method for calculating the cost of expansion). If removed, these procedures will need to be addressed by city policy. J CONCUR: f%,~ I --- Sol Blumenfel Community Development Director en Robertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Draft ordinance, as modified with comments 2. Summary of remaining sections within Article 13 3. City Council Minutes 8/9/94 4. City Council staff report 8/9/94 5. P.C. Resolution 94-8 (P.C. Recommended modifications) KR/pcsrnon it List of Locally Significant Resources 1. Bank of America building, 90 Pier Avenue - one of the oldest commercial structures in downtown 2. Hermosa Hotel, 26 Pier Avenue - the oldest hotel building in downtown, built before World War I 3. Bijou Theater, 1229 Hermosa Avenue - the oldest movie theater in city 4. commercial building at northeast corner of Pier and Hermosa Avenues, 1200 Hermosa Avenue - only early 20th Century brick architecture in downtown 5. Insomniac site, 49-53 Pier Avenue (now Loreto Plaza) - former site of Insomniac coffeehouse, famous poetry and jazz theater in 1950s and 1960s 6. The Lighthouse, 30 Pier Avenue - famous jazz nightclub since 1940s 7. Del Mar Apartments, 840 Strand - early 20th Century downtown apartment building C 8. Berth Hotel, 1042 Strand - built in 1907 and commended by the City for its beautification in 1978; now part of the Sea Sprite Motel complex 9. Sea Sprite Motel, 1016 Strand - oldest of the modern -era motor lodge in City, in continuous operation since the 1940s 10. Grannis Hotel and Apartments, 24 11th Street - built in 1911, also known as the St. Francis Hotel in the 1950s 11. Pueblo Apartments, 1912 Hermosa Avenue - architecturally distinctive adobe style dating back to 1924 12. Matteson home, 1040 Manhattan Avenue - distinctive frame architecture with gabled roof 13. Pitcher House, 142 Pacific Coast Highway - distinctive early 20th Century style brick architecture 14. old Mrs. Gooch's building, 526 Pier Avenue - early American style wood frame building, formerly the Hermosa Tabernacle Church in the 1920s 15. GTE building, 102 Pacific Coast Highway - classic deco brick architecture commercial building 16. Clark Stadium building, 861 Valley Drive - small deco style LI' building over 50 years old 135 - �IS- C J` 17. Community Center, 710 Pier Avenue - classic deco building formerly used as an elementary school 18. Charlie Chaplin house, 32 10th Street - summer home for (� Charlie Chaplin family, featuring distinctive front porch arches 19. house, 1602 Strand - Spanish -style castle structure with art glass windows built in 1928 20. Neutra Apartments, 1608-1612 Strand - built in 1938, believed to be an early example of famous architect Richard Neutra - 21. T. L. Woolwine house, 2601 Strand - Pre -World War I building, former home of Los Angeles District Attorney during early 1900s 22. Ozzie and Harriet Nelson home, 3133 Strand - summer home to famous.entertainment family with an attractive wood shingle facade 23. Sprague house, 3301 Strand - home to members of the Sprague family, who were part of Nixon's "Kitchen Cabinet," distinguished by pink stucco facade and garden style layout 24. McComb house, 3409 Strand - former home of State Supreme Court Justice McComb 25. Sarah A. Beane house, 2330 Strand - quaint early bungalow C house that is one of the oldest residential structures in South Bay, dated back to 1880s. Formerly the real estate office of Sarah A. Beane, the City's first postmaster 26. William W. Mathews house, 37 9th Street - large two story early California bungalow house built in 1907, formerly the home of William W. Mathews, Hermosa Beach Mayor and councilman during World War II 27. William Jennings Bryan home, 2045 Monterey Boulevard - classic California bungalow, home to the famous politician and orator during his retirement years 28. Matteson home, 1901 Manhattan Avenue - beautiful mansion built in 1921 by noted architect Paul Williams, one of the few South Bay examples of his work Possible Historic Districts - residential neighborhood bounded by 16th Street, Strand, 20th Street, and Hermosa Avenue - Strand houses north of 26th Street (t - 136 - jvi a p 17 LOCALLY SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC RESOURCES Location Map ll�hklb-- ELI The public hearing opened at 8:05 P.M. Coming forward address the Council on this item was: Chuck Sheldon - 1800 The Strand, owns a comm cial building at 10th Street and Hermosa Aven a on a 40 by 100 foot lot; said this amendm t would now allow a remodel of the buil 'ng to be feasible. The public hear' g closed at 8:08 P.M. Action: To prove the Planning C fission and staff recommendation introduce Ordinan a No. 94-1115, which reduces the requi d setback to f' a feet when commercial uses abut residenti ly zoned pr erty in the C-1 and C-2 zones and adds a atement that existing commercial structures that do not eet is setback requirement are not considered nonconform' buildings. Motion Edgerton, second akes. The motion carried, noting the dissenting v e o Reviczky. Final Action: To five further eading of Ordinance No. 94-1115, entitled "AN ORDINANCE F THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA TO AMEND PORT NS OF SECTION 8-5 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Ir REDUCE SETBACK RE UIREMENTS% FOR COMMERCIAL PR7E-DTO RESIDENTIAI( ZONES AND ADOPTIOIVE DECLARATION." Motion owler, second Edgerton. AYES: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, NOES: NoneAt 8:19 P.M. the order of the agenda was HEARINGS 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 13 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES. (Continued from meetings of 4/12, 4/26 and 5/10/94) Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 28, 1994. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Vose also responded to Council questions. The hearing opened at 11:35 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the hearing closed at 11:35 P.M. Action: To approve the draft text amendments to Article 13, "Nonconforming Buildings and Structures", except for the following concerns: 1) Section 13-0, General Goals - concerns with regard to allowing the expansion of nonconforming uses; City Council Minutes 08-09-94 Page 8596 _1 g-, r 2) Section 13-2, B., Expansion/Remodel allowed - clarify the phrase " existing nonconforming side yards may be continued": 3) Section 13-4 - change last sentence to read that determinations of less intensive uses shall be made by the Planning Department rather than Planning Commission; 4) Section 13-6 - add that all current building and safety and fire codes must be met; and, 5) Section 13-6 - develop a specific method for determining "value", and refer the item to the Planning Commission. Motion Oakes, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 6. BILTMORE PARK DESIGN. Memorandum from Public y6rks Director Amy Amirani dated August 1, 1994. Supple ental sign alternatives from the Public Works Depart m t were s • itted directly to the Council at the meeting (This 'tem was heard at 9:36 P.M. but is 7,11n in order for cla ity.) Public Woiks Director Amy Amirani pre nted the staff' report andsponded to Council questi s. Coming forward to a ress the Council on is item were: Sheila Don hue Miller 77 1 h Street, said the Ordinanc d -id not incl a hardscape because it had creat problems Santa Monica, and, had benches onl • and, Eleanor Parrish - 431 nterey Boulevard, said that Santa Monica d allowed for homeless in its oceanfront par oceanfront par and the in Laguna. people love the Action: To direct th# this i em be sent to the Parks, Recreation an/cost ity Resou es Advisory Commission for review ofiltmore Park Construction Documents and to approvalternative er three, deleting seatwalls exceg the Strand an deleting lighting, for a new totof $54,875 with a item to return to Council noan September 27, 1 94. Motion Revicz�cy, second Oakes. The moti�� carried by a unanimous vote. The meeting recessed at 10:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:20 P.M. and moved the rder of the agenda,�o item 12. 7. DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE BALLOT MEASURES WITH RESOLUT QNS FOR' ADOPTION CALLING GIVING NOTICE AND REQUEST' G CONSOLIDATION AND CERTAIN OTHER RESOLUTIONS NECESSARY FO City Council Minutes 08-09-94 Page 8597 ITEM #6: SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 13 REGARDING NON -CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS OF APRIL 12, APRIL 26, MAY 10 AND AUGUST 9. 1994. PLEASE REFER TO THE AGENDA PACKETS FROM THESE MEETINGS TO REVIEW PREVIOUS STAFF REPORTS. _rs Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 5, 1994 City Council Meeting of December 13, 1994 1993-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (Including Report from Independent Auditor) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the 1993-94 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), which includes the report from Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P., our independent auditors. Background: Annually the City has a financial audit performed by an independent certified public accounting firm. The auditor's report is on page 1 behind the second divider labeled "Financial Section". The City again received an unqualified opinion, which indicates that the auditor believes the financial statements present a fair picture of the financial position of the City, as opposed to a qualified opinion, in which the auditor "qualifies" or limits his opinion for specific reasons, such as lack of fixed asset accounting or significant internal control deficiencies. This is the sixth year that the more comprehensive report (as opposed to just financial statements) has been prepared, in accordance with guidelines provided by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and all applicable accounting standards. Last year, for the fourth time, the City's report received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the GFOA; the City also received the Certificate of Award for Outstanding Financial Reporting from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) for the fifth time. The award programs require a high level of compliance with governmental standards, inclusion of information well beyond the general purpose financial statements and an unqualified audit opinion. The 1993-94 CAFR will again be submitted to both of the associations for consideration in the award programs since the certificates are valid for one year only. Analysis: The following analysis deals with the General Fund, which is the main operating fund of the City. Additional analysis of all governmental funds is included in the Transmittal Letter which begins on page vii at the front of the CAFR. General Fund Revenue General Fund revenue received was 3% under budget and 13% lower than revenue received in 1992-93. The decrease is inflated however, due to one-time funds received from the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) as a result of the Governor's State budget balancing legislation in 1992-93. Adjusting for the PERS funds and one-time Transportation, Planning and Development (TPD) funds received in 1993-94 (also part of State budget balancing), the actual decrease in revenue would be 5.6%. The decline in property tax is attributable primarily to the State's shift of funds from local government to schools for budget balancing purposes. In addition, because of the economy, county -wide property tax collections are slower; since cities receive a portion of those county- wide collections, our property tax receipts are also slower. Sales tax revenue decreased for the fourth year in a row; receipts declined 4% for the second year in a row, however a 3% increase is estimated for 1994-95 due to the opening of several new businesses. The table on the next page displays sales tax information for the largest classes of businesses in 93-94 (representing 74% of the sales tax) and the change from the previous year. 2 Increase % Of FY 93-94 (Decrease) Inc. Percent Revenue Source Amount From FY 92-93 (Dec.) of Total Property Taxes $3,027,168 ($278,320) -8.42% 38.39% Sales Tax 1,374,990 (62,393) -4.34 17.44 Other Taxes 1,516,503 81,901 5.71 19.23 Licenses & Permits 124,078 (46,835) -27.40 1.57 Fines & Forfeitures 82,504 (6,950) -7.77 1.05 Use of Money and Property 368,786 (68,677) -15.70 4.68 Intergovernmental Revenue 850,423 103,248 13.82 10.79 Charges for Services 388,777 (72,790) -15.77 4.93 Miscellaneous 31,648 (859,245) -96.45 0.40 Interest 120,023 (8,531) -6.64 1.52 Total $7,884.900 ($1.218,592) -13.39% 100% The decline in property tax is attributable primarily to the State's shift of funds from local government to schools for budget balancing purposes. In addition, because of the economy, county -wide property tax collections are slower; since cities receive a portion of those county- wide collections, our property tax receipts are also slower. Sales tax revenue decreased for the fourth year in a row; receipts declined 4% for the second year in a row, however a 3% increase is estimated for 1994-95 due to the opening of several new businesses. The table on the next page displays sales tax information for the largest classes of businesses in 93-94 (representing 74% of the sales tax) and the change from the previous year. 2 1993-94 SALES TAX BY CLASS RANK/BUS/NESS CLASS % OF CHANGE % OF PREVIOUS 1993-94 INC/(DEC) PREY. YR TOTAL YEAR 1. EATING/DRINKING $295,041 1,348 0.46% 29.05% 1 PLACES -14.02 2. AUTO DEALERS 235,367 3. GROCERY STORES 169,464 4. LUMBER/BUILDING 65,273 MATERIALS 5. SPORTING GOODS/ 58,532 BICYCLES 6. SPECIALTY STORES 52,389 7. SERVICE STATIONS 47,414 8. WHOLESALE TEXTILES/ 35,769 FURNISHINGS 9. AUTO REPAIR SHOPS/ 29,131 GARAGES 10. NON -STORE RETAILERS 27,256 (FULL-TIME) (38,377) -14.02 23.17 2 (12,811) -7.03 16.69 3 (4,809) -6.86 6.43 5 (4,259) -6.78 5.76 6 (35,625) -40.48 5.16 4 2,815 6.31 4.67 7 5,280 17.32 3.52 9 (1,680) -5.45 2.87 8 3,246 13.52 2.68 10 In the Other Tax category, transfer tax, which applies to real estate transfers, rose by 21%. The new voter approved 1/2 cent sales tax for public safety also appears in this category. Most other revenue categories show declines due to economic conditions such as lower interest rates and lack of building activity. Intergovernmental Revenue reflects one-time TPD funds mentioned previously. K General Fund Expenditures General Fund expenditures were 1 % under budget and 2.5% less than last year. Expenditures decreased from the previous year in almost every category due to the reorganization of the Planning, Building and Business License Departments into Community Development, the flattening and downsizing of the organization (reduction of 17 positions) and privatization of the street sweeping function. The Legislative/Legal category increase of 16.45% reflects the increased level of lawsuit activity and costs of the municipal election consolidated with Los Angeles County. Culture/Recreation increased due to long-delayed tree trimming in several locations and increased contract costs of parks and median maintenance. 4 Increase % Of FY 93-94 (Decrease) Inc. Percent Function Amount From FY 92-93 (Dec.) of Total Current: Legislative & Legal $ 532,663 $75,227 16.45% 5.17% General Government 2,594,766 9,375 0.36 25.17 Public Safety 4,797,606 (37,655) -0.78 46.54 Community Development 470,072 (77,630) -14.17 4.56 Culture & Recreation 685,853 30,993 4.73 6.65 Public Works 876,213 (130,716) -12.98 8.50 Sanitation $ 283,235 ($18,629) -6.17 2.75 Debt Service: Principal 60,700 (4,620) -7.07 0.59 Interest 7,433 (1,055) -12.43 0.07 Capital Outlay - -0- (109,852) -100.00 0.00 Total $10,308,541 ($264,562) -2.50% 100% The Legislative/Legal category increase of 16.45% reflects the increased level of lawsuit activity and costs of the municipal election consolidated with Los Angeles County. Culture/Recreation increased due to long-delayed tree trimming in several locations and increased contract costs of parks and median maintenance. 4 General Fund Comparison 1984-95 The chart below shows a graphic presentation of revenue/expenditure trends for 1984-94 actual and 1994-95 budget, and the fund balance as a percent of expenditures. 13 12 11 10 9 B c 7 0 6 5 4 3. 2 0 GENERAL FUND COMPARISON 1984 -1995 REVENUE. EXPENDITURES. FUND BALANCE 85-86 87-88 89-90 91-92 93-94 ® FUND BALANCE o REVENUE x EXPENDITURES Revenue/Expenditure Trends The City has maintained a positive trend (with revenue and transfers -in exceeding expenditures) for most years, from 1984 to 1994. In 1989-90, expenditures were higher because over a million dollars was transferred out and earmarked for the Greenbelt purchase. In 1991-92, the City used a combination of revenue increases, expenditure reductions and carryover funds to offset the budget shortfall - without significantly reducing service levels and still maintaining reasonable reserves. The gap between revenues and expenditures experienced in 91-92 was closed in 92-93 by making across-the-board budget reductions, deferral of capital expenditures and some use of the refunded excess retirement funds from the state. E 1993-94 expenditures exceeded revenue due to one-time costs for implementation of a personal computer (PC) based local area network for data processing and use of previously received retirement funds from the State to fund equipment purchases. As the graph indicates, a positive position was achieved in the 1994-95 budget through the measures described previously on page 4. Genera/ Fund Fund Balance Fund balance as a percent of expenditures is a measure of the City's cushion against economic uncertainties or revenue shortfalls. Bond rating agencies have commonly considered at least a 5% reserve "prudent"; level of reserves is, of course, a subjective and individual decision for each city, particularly in the economic climate of the past few years. As the chart shows, the City began building a reasonable fund balance in 1985 has maintained well over 10% for the past several years. The fund balance increase in 1992-93 is attributable to receipt of one-time surplus retirement funds which were earmarked for specific uses in 1993-94. The fund balance/expenditure ratio decreased when these funds were used in 1993-94. The fund balance earmarked for contingencies at the end of 93-94 is $1,384,453 or 13% of expenditures. Midyear Budget Review is just around the corner and will provide the next opportunity to review our financial picture. Nancy Shelmon, the partner in charge of our audit, will be present at the meeting. CONCUR: xq� Stephe6 Wbdrrell, City Manager Viki Copeland, Finance Director The report is available for review in the library and the Finance Department. M Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 6, 1994 City Council Meeting of December 13, 1994 AUDITOR REVIEW OF APPROPRIATION LIMIT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the review of the 1993-94 Appropriation Limitation submitted by the City's independent auditor, Coopers and Lybrand, L. L. P.. Background.- In ackground: In November of 1979, Article XIIIB of the California State Constitution (commonly known as the Gann Limitation) was added by the voters through Proposition 4. This Article established limits, using a formula, on state and local governments for appropriation of revenue.from tax proceeds. The City Council annually adopts the appropriation limitation; the 1993-94 limit was adopted on June 22, 1994. Proposition 111, which was passed by the voters in June 1990, requires the City to conduct a review of the appropriation limit during the annual financial audit. Analysis: The auditor's review of the 1993-94 appropriation limit determined that, as far as their procedures provide, appropriate procedures were followed in determining and adopting the limit. .ueC.i Viki Copeland, Finance Director CONCUR: ,; A (� Steph6 Burrell, City Manager AUDIT/APLIMIT/rkAz I b COOA Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. 350 South Grand Avenue telephone (213) 356-6000 eLos Angeles. California & Ly rand 90071-3405 facsimile (213) 356-6363 a professional services firm The Honorable City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California: We have applied the procedures enumerated below to the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 of the City of Hermosa Beach for the year ended June 30, 1994. These procedures, which were agreed to by the League of California Cities and presented in their Article XIIIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines, were performed solely to assist you in meeting the requirements of Section 1.5 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. This report is intended for the information of management and the City Council. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public records. The procedures performed were as follows: 1. We obtained the completed worksheets (#1 through #7) presented in the Article XIIIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines (or other alternative computations), and determined that the limit and annual adjustment factors were adopted by resolution of the City Council. We also determined that the population and inflation options were selected by a recorded vote of the City Council. 2. For the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6, we added line A, last year's limit, to line E', total adjustments, and agreed the resulting amount to line F, this year's limit. 3. We agreed the current year appropriations limit presented in the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 to the other worksheets described in #1 above. 4. We agreed the prior year appropriations limit presented in the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 to the prior year appropriations limit adopted by the City Council during the prior year. These agreed-upon procedures are substantially less in scope than an audit, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion on the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., a registered limited liability partnership, is a member firm of Coopers & Lybrand (International). Based on the application of the procedures referred to above, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 was not computed in accordance with Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. Had we performed additional procedures or had we made an audit of the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet #6 and the other completed worksheets described in #1 above, matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. Los Angeles, California October 1, 1994 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1994-95 BUDGET CALCULATION OF APPROPRIATION LIMIT LIMITATION FOR 1986-87 FISCAL YEAR $8,609,437 1987-88: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 3.47% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 1.91% 1988-89: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 4.66% CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH POPULATION CHANGE 1.81% 1989-90: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 5.19% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 1.14% 1990-91: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 4.21% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 1.36% 1991-92: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 4.14% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 1.73% 1992-93: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE -0.64% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 1.49% Continued.... CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1994-95 BUDGET CALCULATION OF APPROPRIATION LIMIT (Continued) 1993-94:. PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 2.72% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 0.96% 1994-95: PER CAPITA INCOME CHANGE 0.71% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES POPULATION CHANGE 0.75% LIMITATION FOR 1994-95 FISCAL YEAR $12,217,739 A-4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1994 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 PREPARED BY THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA FINANCE DEPARTMENT VIKI L. COPELAND, FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING - GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION CERTIFICATE OF AWARD FOR OUTSTANDING FINANCIAL REPORTING - CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS ORGANIZATION CHART PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA FINANCIAL SECTION REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: COMBINED BALANCE SHEET - ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET AND ACTUAL ALL PROPRIETARY FUNDS COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ii Paae vii xviii xix xx xxi 1 3 5 6 9 10 12 13 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued Page FINANCIAL SECTION, Continued COMBINING, INDIVIDUAL FUND AND ACCOUNT GROUP STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES: GENERAL FUND: COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS - GENERAL FUND 39 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES 40 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: COMBINING BALANCE SHEET 43 COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES 45 COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL 47 ENTERPRISE FUNDS: COMBINING BALANCE SHEET 61 COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS 62 COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET AND ACTUAL 63 COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 66 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND: COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS 67 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNING 68 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 69 iii CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued iv Page FINANCIAL SECTION, Continued COMBINING, INDIVIDUAL FUND AND ACCOUNT GROUP STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES - Continued PARKING FUND: COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS 70 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS 71 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 72 PROPOSITION "A" TRANSIT FUND: COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS 73 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS 74 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 75 PROPOSITION "C" TRANSIT FUND: COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS 76 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS 77 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 78 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND: COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS 80 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) 81 STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET TO ACTUAL 82 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 83 iv CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued v Page FINANCIAL SECTION, Continued COMBINING, INDIVIDUAL FUND AND ACCOUNT GROUP STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES - Continued FIDUCIARY FUND - AGENCY FUND: COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS 85 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 86 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP: COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY SOURCE 88 SCHEDULE OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS - BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY 89 SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS - BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY 90 GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT ACCOUNT GROUP: SCHEDULE OF GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT 92 STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE - Last Ten Fiscal Years 94 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION - Last Ten Fiscal Years 95 ASSESSED AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY - Last Ten Fiscal Years 96 PROPERTY TAX RATES AND TAX LEVIES - ALL OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS - Last Ten Fiscal Years 97 PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS - Last Ten Fiscal Years 98 v CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS - Continued STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED), Continued COMPUTATION OF LEGAL DEBT MARGIN STATEMENT OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT DEMOGRAPHIC STATISTICS - Last Ten Fiscal Years CONSTRUCTION VALUE, PROPERTY VALUE AND BANK DEPOSITS - Last Ten Fiscal Years SCHEDULE OF INSURANCE PRINCIPAL TAXPAYERS MAJOR EMPLOYERS TAXABLE SALES BY CATEGORY - Calendar Years 1984-93 MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICS vi Page 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 IJ P-1 C 5 O c 0 Q cn0 c� o' m meow IJ P-1 C I Cityof 9ermosaTeac/L...� A gig;► Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 December 1, 1994 Honorable Mayor and City Council Hermosa Beach, California I am pleased to submit the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the City of Hermosa Beach (`City). The report covers the period July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994. Responsibility for the accuracy and fairness of presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the City. We believe the data, as presented, is accurate in all material aspects; that it is presented in a manner designed to set forth the financial position and results of operations of the City as measured by the financial activity of its various funds; and that all disclosures necessary for the reader's maximum understanding of the City's financial affairs are included. The report has been prepared following the guidelines recommended by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA). The GFOA and the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers both have award programs for reports which substantially conform to high standards of reporting set by various standard-setting bodies, including the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. In accordance with these standards, the report contains three distinct sections: 1. Introductory Section - letter of transmittal, listing of principal officers, and organization chart. 2. Financial Section - general purpose financial statements, notes to the general purpose financial statements, combining and individual fund and account group statements and schedules. 3. Statistical Section - a variety of financial, physical, economic and social data presenting trends and other information intended to give users a broader understanding of the City. The Reporting Entity and Its Services P 9 Y The City of Hermosa Beach is a general law city which was incorporated on January 14, 1907. The City operates under the Council -Manager form of government. Hermosa Beach offers a full range of municipal services, including police and fire protection, planning and zoning, recreation and parks, maintenance of public works, Vii enforcement of building codes, parking and animal control, public improvements and general administration. Financial information for the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District (formerly the Vehicle Parking District), Hermosa Beach Parking Authority, and the Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts are included in the City's financial statements as required by governmental accounting standards. Funds of the Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts are shown as Special Revenue Funds; the Downtown Enhancement District is an Enterprise Fund. A separate Downtown Business Enhancement Commission sets policy for the public parking lots, subject to review by the City Council. Councilmembers serve, in a separate session, as the governing board for the Parking Authority. The Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts were created as separate assessment districts pursuant to Street and Highway Code §22500- 22679 and Government Code §55530-70, respectively, to fund those functional activities. Economic Condition and Outlook The City of Hermosa Beach is a beachfront, bedroom community with a stable population located 4 miles south of Los Angeles International Airport. The State's latest population estimate for Hermosa Beach is 18,714, however as a beach city, Hermosa does experience a high visitor population and the associated costs. During the 1993-94 year, beach attendance ranged from a low of 59,500 in February 1994, to a high of 452,500 in August 1993, with an average of 189,046. The California economy continues to trail behind the national economy. In June, national unemployment was 6.2%; California, 8.3%; Los Angeles County, 10.1 %. The State estimates Hermosa Beach unemployment at 2.6%, however, that number is probably low due to ' underestimation of the effects of national defense policy on local aerospace/defense employment. While those numbers are somewhat daunting, they are an improvement over the January numbers of 10.5% for California and 11 % for Los Angeles County. Other indications which may signal a slowly recovering economy are the statewide increase of 4.3% over 1993 in retail sales for the first quarter of 1994, and a moderate increase in home sales and median home prices. The City's revenue base is largely dependent on property taxes (38% of General Fund revenue) and sales tax (17% of General Fund revenue). The passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, which limited property taxes state-wide, virtually eliminated local control of property tax. Property taxes are assessed at 1% of market value and are capped at 2% growth per year. The City Council does have some discretion over sales tax receipts through policy setting. Sales tax receipts in Hermosa Beach declined by 4% for the second year in a row, however, several new or replacement businesses are on the horizon, and the City and the Chamber of Commerce are focusing on revitalizing the downtown area, both of which bode a positive impact on sales tax. The City's total assessed valuation rose 2% over 1992-93, which is the lowest growth in the I past ten years. The low growth reflects the decline in property values and the stagnation that has been present in real estate for four years. Transfer taxes, which are levied on real estate transfers, rose by an encouraging 21 % over 1992-93, perhaps signaling a return to a healthier market. For the second year, cities in California suffered property tax losses during the State's budget balancing process. Hermosa Beach lost almost $1 million over the last three years due to state legislative action. The impact of revenue lost by counties in the State budget battle also trickles down" to cities, as counties seek to balance their budgets by charging cities for services historically provided by counties. The instability created by these legislative actions compounds the already difficult task of financing local government. Responding to yet another year of declining revenue and adverse state actions, the City adopted a budget which further reduced expenditures by consolidating the Building and Planning Departments into Community Development, eliminating 17 positions and making major changes in the City's data processing system. Despite the economic climate, the City maintained a reasonable fund balance in the General Fund, representing 15% of annual expenditures; 13% of the fund balance is designated for contingencies or economic uncertainties. Major Initiatives Some of the most significant activities in progress or completed are listed below, grouped according to functional activity. General Government In July 1993, the County of Los Angeles announced closure of several libraries, including the sole library in Hermosa Beach, as a budget balancing measure. Funds ultimately were restored by the County Board of Supervisors, however, the City is continuing to investigate steps to withdraw from the County system and become independent if necessary. The Cable Television Board continued negotiations for franchise renewal begun in 1992-93. The Board expects to recommend agreement with an operator in early 1994-95. Per the Cable Act of 1992, the City applied to the Federal Communications Commission and was certified to regulate basic cable television rates. The City Council also adopted a new ordinance which established consumer protection standards for cable television. The City began offering computer access to City Council agendas, minutes, and a City calendar. Information and items available will be expanded in the future. Installation of a Personal Computer-based (PC) network for all departments was completed. Migration from a mini -based system to the PC based system will be completed in 1994-95, with replacement and conversion of all existing software applications. ix e � I Community Development The City will complete consolidation of the Building, Planning and Business License departments into a Community Development Department; the consolidation was begun in 1993-94 to provide a central source of permit and development information in one City Hall location. Upon recommendation of the Downtown Area Enhancement Commission, the City Council hired a consultant to perform a downtown enhancement study and provide an implementation plan. The study continues the cooperative effort between the City and Chamber of Commerce to revitalize the downtown area. The Community Development Department will initiate a ' program to assist property owners seeking to make facade improvements and upgrade unreinforced masonry buildings. The Land Use Element of the General Plan was adopted; the Element includes land use inventory for the entire city, a commercial area parking and alternative use study, an open space study and a commercial intensity and residential diversity study. Public Safety A study was commissioned in March 1994 by Hermosa Beach and the two neighboring beach cities for consolidation of fire services. Results will be available in 1994-95. The last phase of the police facility remodel was completed in 1993-94. This phase finalizes the complete renovation of the entire facility. Culture/Recreation The City opened a previously acquired parcel at Edith Rodaway Park to provide an additional '/z acre of open space. Construction will begin in 1994-95 on a .42 acre city -owned beachfront property, which voters designated in November 1992 as open space to preserve its use as a public park. The City obtained a grant from the California Department of Forestry to plant an additional 115 trees on the greenbelt that runs through the City. Public Works Bids were solicited for contracting of the street sweeping function. After comparing costs of the in-house operation, the City Council decided to privatize the function. A major project to extend the Hermosa Beach Bike Path and reconstruct the Strand walkway and retaining wall, which runs the length of the beachfront, is 95% complete. The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission provided over $1,200,000 for the project. The Circulation Element of the General Plan will be amended to provide a northern connection to x the bikeway, and depending on the design, application for additional funding may be submitted. Documents are being prepared for creation of an Underground Utility District in three areas of the City. $2 million in funding from Southern California Edison will be used. For the Future The City will receive $1.5 million for municipal pier renovation from passage of Proposition A, the Los Angeles County Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Act. Proposition A provides $560 million for funds to improve public parks and recreational facilities throughout the county. A consultant was selected to prepare the schematic design for the pier upon recommendation of the Municipal Pier Sub -committee. A design competition was sponsored by the American Institute of Architects and the Chamber of Commerce to obtain a variety of ideas for the pier. In addition to the $1.5 for municipal pier improvements, the City will also be reimbursed $2.48 million from Proposition A funds for debt service related to 19.5 acres of open space acquired in 1990 with certificates of participation. The City selected a firm to provide an infrastructure management system which will be used to identify sewer and pavement projects. Construction will occur in 1994-95. Due to a County budget shortfall, Los Angeles County proposed full cost recovery or withdrawal of lifeguard services from Hermosa Beach. Services have historically been provided by the County. Ultimately, the lifeguard function was transferred from the County Beaches and Harbor Department to the County Fire Department, which provided temporary fiscal relief. The City is exploring alternative service provisions in the event of further funding shortfalls. A city-wide records retention schedule and records management program will be presented to the City Council in 1994-95. The program will be administered by the Office of the City Clerk. A compliance/transition plan for the American Disabilities Act was developed and will be implemented in 1994-95. The goal of the plan is to achieve full access, where possible, for persons with disabilities. Accounting System and Budgetary Control All governmental fund types and the Agency Fund are maintained on a modified accrual basis of accounting, with revenue recognized when measurable/available and expenditures recognized when incurred. Proprietary fund types are accounted for on an accrual basis of accounting, with revenue recognized when earned and expenses recognized when incurred. Internal controls, an integral part of the accounting system, are the methods and procedures used to safeguard and maintain accountability over assets and to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded properly to support preparation of reliable reports. Xi The City Council adopts an annual budget by June 30" of each year as required by the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. A midyear review of the budget is conducted after the first six months of the fiscal year to ensure estimates are on target. Other budgetary amendments are made as needed. Budgetary control is maintained at the fund level, however, departments are responsible for oversight of their budget. The City Manager may transfer budgeted amounts between accounts within each fund; transfers between funds require City Council approval. Revenue and expenditure reports, with budget to actual comparisons, are distributed to the City Council and department heads monthly. An encumbrance system is used to record obligations prior to payment as an aid in controlling expenditures. General Government Operations 1 Revenue ' The largest revenue source, Taxes, representing 75% of revenue, decreased by 2%, primarily due to lower property tax collections resulting from the State shift of local funds to schools. Property tax comprises 28% of revenue and until the State action, had been a stable source of revenue for the past ten years. Sales tax in Hermosa Beach declined by 4%. xii The following schedule summarizes General and Special Revenue Fund revenue for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1994, presenting the amount and percentage of increases and decreases in relation to prior year revenue. Increase % Of FY 93-94 Revenue Source Amount Percent Of Total (Decrease) Inc. From FY 92-93 (Dec.) Property Taxes $3,247,247 28.28% ($282,921) -8.01% ' Other Taxes 5,347,682 46.59 126,770 2.43 Licenses & Permits 124,078 1.08 (46,835) -27.40 ' Fines & Forfeitures 179,356 1.56 (168,914) -48.50 Use of Money and Property 368,786 3.21 (68,677) -15.70 Intergovernmental Revenue 1,245,037 10.84 122,762 10.94 ' Charges for Services 389,859 3.40 (76,435) -16.39 Miscellaneous 44,029 0.38 (949,502) -95.57 Interest 535,193 4.66 (96,668) -15.30 Total $11,481,267 100.00% ($1,440,420) -11.15% Revenue for General and Special Revenue Funds decreased 11.15% from 1992-93. After adjusting the two years for one-time revenues received, the decrease would be 5.66%. ' The largest revenue source, Taxes, representing 75% of revenue, decreased by 2%, primarily due to lower property tax collections resulting from the State shift of local funds to schools. Property tax comprises 28% of revenue and until the State action, had been a stable source of revenue for the past ten years. Sales tax in Hermosa Beach declined by 4%. xii The 27.40% decline in Licenses and Permits and 16% decline in Charges for Services reflects the weak economy with respect to building activity. Building -related permit revenue, collectively, declined by 32%. The Fines and Forfeitures category includes funds seized by the Special Investigations Unit as a result of illegal activity. The City's share of seizures has decreased as more cities participate countywide in the drug interdiction program. Use of Money and Property decreased due to an exchange of excess Proposition A Transit Funds with another city in a lesser amount than the previous year. Funds received from the exchange are no longer restricted for transit uses and may be used for general purposes. The decline in the interest category reflects the lower rates available on investments. The slight increase in the Intergovernmental category is due to the extension of the 1/2 cent sales tax by voters for public safety purposes. The large decrease in the Miscellaneous category is due to a one-time refund of excess retirement earnings received from California Public Employees Retirement System in the prior year. The funds were designated for specific capital outlay purchases. Expenditures The following schedule summarizes General and Special Revenue Fund expenditures by functional category for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1994, presenting the percentage of increases and decreases in relation to prior year expenditures. Increase % Of , FY 93-94 Percent (Decrease) Inc. Function Amount Of Total From FY 92-93 (Dec.) , Current: Legislative & Legal $ 532,663 4.09% $75,227 16.45% General Government 2,594,766 19.93 9,375 0.36 , Public Safety 5,597,450 43.00 104,500 1.90 Community Development 498,633 3.83 (97,581) -16.37 ' Culture & Recreation 685,853 5.27 30,993 4.73 Public Works 2,116,372 16.26 (134,629) -5.98 Sanitation 283,235 2.18 (18,629) -6.17 , Debt Service: , Principal 425,472 3.27 24,590 6.13 Interest 282,218 2.17 (21,797) -7.17 Capital Outlay -0- -- (109,852) -100.00 Total $13,016,662 100.00% ($137,803) -1.05% F1 Expenditures in the General and Special Revenue Funds decreased by 1.05% overall. Adjusting for capital improvement projects which are included in the functional categories, operational expenditures decreased by 3.39%. Public Safety, representing the largest area of expenditure at 43% of total expenditures, increased by 1.90%. The second largest category, General Government, which includes administrative support departments, all employee benefits and all retirement costs for General Fund operations, increased by .36%. Employee benefits and retirement costs will be departmentalized next year to provide a clearer picture of functional costs. Reductions in Community Development, Public Works and Sanitation, reflect the consolidation, down -sizing and privatizing used as budget balancing strategies. Proprietary Operations Proprietary funds account for operations which are financed and operated in a manner similar to business enterprises. The City uses both enterprise and internal service funds. The Downtown Enhancement Fund, Parking Fund, Proposition A and Proposition C Transit Funds are enterprise funds. The Insurance Fund, an internal service fund, accounts for insurance costs which are funded by charges to user departments. ' Downtown Enhancement Fund The Downtown Enhancement Fund replaces the Vehicle Parking District (VPD) Fund of the VPD established in 1964. The VPD had specific downtown boundaries and use of funds generated by downtown parking lots was limited primarily to expenses relating to parking places. _1 P, In July 1994, the City Council replaced the Board of Parking Place Commissioners, who had oversight of the VPD, with an advisory Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission and expanded the permissible range of activities for use of the funds. The Commission oversees downtown parking lots which are operated by an independent contractor. Funds of the Downtown Enhancement Area are generated primarily by these downtown parking lots. The goal of the expanded use of funds and the new commission is to promote economic revitalization of businesses in general and to improve the physical appearance of the downtown business district in order to create jobs, attract new businesses and expand the existing tax base. The Downtown Enhancement Fund had net income of $81,167 for the fiscal year 1993-94. Parking Fund All street parking permit, fine and meter revenue is deposited to the Parking Fund to finance parking operations and capital improvements. In accordance with the municipal code, any excess funds are transferred to the General Fund at the end of the year. Xiv Total revenue in the Parking Fund was relatively flat, declining by .03%. The City Council considered the option of contracting out the Parking Enforcement function in 1992-93 and conducted a further review of operations at mid -year 1993-94. Operating expenses overall declined by 3%. Transit Funds Transit funds consist of the Proposition A Fund (the one cent sales tax for Los Angeles County transportation purposes) and the Proposition C Fund, which is an additional '/z cent sales tax approved by the voters. Both Proposition A and Proposition C funds must be used for transit purposes; Proposition C uses are a bit less restrictive and can be used for some street purposes. The City participates in the following programs: a Dial -A -Ride program with the City of Redondo Beach; a commuter freeway express bus to downtown Los Angeles with four other cities; subsidized bus passes for senior citizens and students. The City also exchanged surplus Proposition A funds with another city in return for unrestricted general funds. The Proposition A fund had retained earnings of $74,328 at year end; the Proposition C fund had retained earnings of $152,495. Insurance Fund The Insurance Internal Service Fund was created to account for costs associated with the , City's insurance: liability, worker's compensation, unemployment, auto, property and officials' bonds. These costs are distributed to all operating departments in the form of a service charge. Formulas are designed to capture each departments fair share of the insurance cost. Fund liabilities include estimates of amounts needed to pay prior and current year claims. The fund ended the year with equity of $719,079. , Fiduciary Operations I An agency fund is used to account for assets held for other funds, governments or individuals. The City offers two deferred compensation plans for employees, which are accounted for in an ' agency fund. The increase in fund assets of $206,395 represents an increase in participants and contributions. Debt Administration The City has no debt subject to the legal debt limit (as shown on the Computation of Legal , Debt Margin, Statistical Section); however, descriptions and information regarding long-term debt are found in the Notes to the Financial Statements. XV L n Cash Management The City Treasurer invests temporarily idle funds in accordance with the State Government Code. The City's formal investment policy, as authored by the Treasurer and approved by the City Council, requires an even more cautious investment placement criteria. Institutions must have a minimum 5% net asset value to qualify for certificate of deposit investment consideration. Only government securities are accepted as collateral. Investments are limited to U.S. Treasury notes, certificates of deposit, corporate notes and the State and County Pooled Investment Funds. Shown below is the percentage of idle funds in each instrument category on June 30, 1994. U.S. Securities 24% Local Agency Investment Fund 61% Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Fund 15% Interest earned for 1993-94 was $710,861 with an average interest rate of 5.65%. The average length of maturity on U.S. Securities held was 1708 days. Risk Management The City increased the level of self insurance from $100,000 to $250,000 for liability claims. Future savings in premium costs due to the change will remain in the fund as a cushion in the event of unanticipated losses. Excess coverage up to $10 million is obtained through the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA), a joint powers authority consisting of medium-sized California municipalities. The cost of the excess coverage depends on both the loss experience of member cities and the loss experience of Hermosa Beach. The City is self-insured up to $300,000 for worker's compensation claims, with statutory limit excess coverage provided through a private insurance carrier. Claims defense and settlement are coordinated by third party administrators for both liability and worker's compensation, with oversight by the Risk Manager. High value vehicle and property insurance is placed with private insurance carriers. Independent Audit City financial records are audited annually by independent certified public accountants selected by the City Council. The Report of Independent Accountants is included in the Financial Section. The responsibility of the independent accountants is to express an opinion on the City's financial statements based on their audit. The bnqualified"opinion received by the City indicates that the independent accountants believe that the financial statements present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the city. xvi Certificate of Achievement The Government Finance Officers' Association awards certificates of Achievement to those entities whose annual financial reports are judged to conform substantially with high standards of public financial reporting. The City of Hermosa Beach has been awarded the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the GFOA for its annual reports since fiscal year 1990 and the Certificate of Award for Outstanding Financial Reporting by the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers since 1989. The certificates are valid for one year only. We believe our current report continues to meet high program standards and will be submitted to both award programs for review. Acknowledgments I would like to express my appreciation to the staff of the Finance Department, the City Manager, all department heads and their staff members and our auditors, Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P., for their assistance and contributions to this report. I would also like to thank the City Council, City Treasurer and City Clerk for their support and continuing service to the community. Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland Finance Director xvii I Certificate of i Achievement for Excellence In Financial 1• Reporting iPresented to City of Hermosa Beach, 1 California For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended ' June 30, 1993 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers 1 Association of the United States and Canada to government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting. �7 President Y��7 Gr*e? Executive Director xviii � I � I � I � I 11 11 11 11 I I 11 CITY CLERK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ELECTORATE CITY COUNCIL CITY TREASURER PLANNING COMMISSION CIVIL SERVICE BOARD BOARD OF APPEALS PARKS &" RECREATION COMMISSION CITY PROSECUTOR CITY MANAGER ICITY ATTORNEY COMMUNITY RESOURCES I I PLANNING I I PUBLIC WORKS I I POLICE Park & Recreation Current Planning Engineering FINANCE Police Facilities Management Parking Enforcement Record Bureau Animal Control Advanced Planning Capital Special Enforcement Cultural/Recreational/ Coordination Improvement Meter Maintenance Athletic Programming Environmental Suppression Investigation Assessment Maintenance Training Special Events Prevention Detention C.U.P. Traffic Labor Relations Cable T.V. Liaison Enforcement Engineering Emergency xx FIRE Dispatch Community Services FINANCE BUILDING & SAFETY Reserves Parking Enforcement Record Bureau Animal Control Fire Special Crossing Guards Investigations Coordination Fire Meter Maintenance xx FIRE PERSONNELI FINANCE BUILDING & SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT Fire Budget Business License Personnel Fire Recruitment Accounting Suppression Plan Checking Training Payroll Prevention Field Inspection Labor Relations Citation Rescue Processing Code Enforcement Workers' Comp Claims Public Animal Refuse Contractor Education Liability Claims Licenses Liaison City Insurance Parking Permits Secretarial Support Bus Passes PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA June 30, 1994 Elected and Administrative Officials City Council Sam Edgerton Robert Benz John Bowler Julie Oakes J.R. Reviczky Mayor Mayor Pro Tempore Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Other Elected Officials John Workman City Treasurer Elaine Doerfling City Clerk xxi Administrative Officials Stephen Burrell City Manager Amy Amirani Public Works Director Robert Blackwood Personnel Director/ Risk Manager Viki Copeland Finance Director Sol Blumenfeld Community Development Director Mary Rooney Community Resources Director Val Straser Police Chief Ed Chesson Acting Fire Chief xxi 0 J 0 0 1 Cooers Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. & Ly rand a professional services firm REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach, California t We have audited the accompanying general purpose financial state- ments of the City of Hermosa Beach, California as of June 30, 1994 and for the year then ended as listed in the table of contents. These general purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, management. Our respon- sibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose finan- cial statements based on our audit. ' We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstate- ment. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general purpose ' financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall general purpose financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit ' provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the general purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City of Hermosa Beach, California as of June 30, 1994, and the results of its operations and changes in its cash flows of its proprietary fund types for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. ' Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., a registered limited liability partnership, is a member firm of Coopers & Lybrand (International). Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The combining and individual fund and account group financial state- ments and schedules listed in the table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general purpose financial statements of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The other data included in this comprehensive annual financial report, designated as "Statistical Section" in the Table of Contents, have not been audited by us and, accordingly, we express no opinion on such data. ' Los Angeles, Californiag ' October 14, 1994 1 t r Assets and other debits: Cash, cash equivalents and investments Cash held by trustee Reimbursable grants receivable Interest receivable on investments Other receivables Deposits - insurance Deferred compensation plan investments Inventory Prepaid expenses Due from other funds Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation Other debits: Amount to be provided for retirement of general long-term debt Total assets Continued CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET - ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS June 30, 1994 Governmental Proprietary Fiduciary Fund Types Fund Types Fund Type Account Groups Special Internal General General General Revenue Enterprise Service Agency Fixed Assets Lona -Term Debt $1,940,627 $9,559,562 $924,904 $867,405 549,377 17,600 22,319 87,415 11,594 354 1,202,596 33,787 47,912 1,601,496 4,903 17,600 1,987,053 2,293 $1,242,776 $19,476,306 $4,617,797 $3,170,445 $10,265,341 $2,971,463 $2,471,548 $1,242,776 $19,476,306 $4,6 , 17797 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 3 Total Memorandum Onl 1994 1993 $13,292,498 $13,912,913 549,377 521,739 17,600 29,035 121,682 121,990 1,284,295 1,342,862 1,601,496 1,282,140 1,242,776 1,036,381 4,903 7,023 2,293 1,998 17,600 17,600 21,463,359 21,134,538 4,617,797 5,151,260 $44,215,676 $44,559,479 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET - ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS, Continued June 30, 1994 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 4 Total (Memorandum Only) 1994 1993 $1,021,704 Governmental Proprietary Fiduciary 17,600 17,600 549,377 Fund Types Fund Types 46,279 Fund Tyke Account Groups 223,921 260,777 Special 1,036,381 Internal 554,810 General General 10,191,631 General Revenue Enterprise Service Agency Fixed Assets Lona -Term Debt Liabilities, equity and other credits: Liabilities: Workers' compensation claims payable $1,021,704 Accounts payable $421,725 $119,215 $234,748 45,679 Due to other funds 17,600 Accrued liabilities 549,377 Accrued wages and compensated absences 287,846 16,749 29,997 7,791 $831,518 Capital leases payable 46,279 Certificates of participation payable 3,740,000 Refundable deposits 223,921 Deferred compensation $1,242,776 General liability claims payable 677,295 Deferred revenue 658,266 19,145 Total liabilities 1,591,758 722,086 264,745 1,752,469 1,242,776 4,617,797 Equity and other credits: Contributed capital 34,844 474,165 Investment in general fixed assets $19,476,306 Retained earnings (deficit): Reserved (Note K) 119,846 Unreserved 2,552,028 244,914 Fund balances: Reserved (Note K) 4,903 131,818 Unreserved: Designated (Note K) 1,573,784 100,000 Undesignated 9,311,437 Total equity and other credits 1,578,687 9,543,255 2,706,718 719,079 19,476,306 Total liabilities, equity, and other credits $3,170,445 $10,265,341 $2,971,463 $2,471,548$1.242,776 $19,476,306 $4,617,797 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 4 Total (Memorandum Only) 1994 1993 $1,021,704 $801,982 821,367 804,011 17,600 17,600 549,377 521,739 1,173,901 1,591,271 46,279 143,191 3,740,000 4,085,000 223,921 260,777 1,242,776 1,036,381 677,295 554,810 677,411 644,247 10,191,631 10,461,009 509,009 581,415 19,476,306 19,200,747 119,846 114,846 2,796,942 2,620,740 136,721 623,681 1,673,784 1,983,763 9.311,437 8,973,278 34,024,045 34,098,470 $44.215.676 $44,559,479 = = = = = M = r = M M = = = = = M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIAy COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 5 Governmental Fund Types Total Special (Memorandum Only) General Revenue 1994 1993 Revenues: Property taxes $3,027,168 $220,079 $3,247,247 $3,530,168 Other taxes 2,891,493 2,456,189 5,347,682 5,220,912 Licenses and permits 124,078 124,078 170,913 Fines and forfeitures 82,504 96,852 179,356 348,270 Use of money and property 368,786 368,786 437,463 Intergovernmental 850,423 394,614 1,245,037 1,122,275 Charges for services 388,777 1,082 389,859 466,294 Miscellaneous 31,648 12,381 44,029 993,531 Interest earned on investments 120,023 415,170 535,193 631,861 Total revenues 7,884,900 3,596,367 11,481,267 12,921,687 Expenditures: Current: Legislative and legal 532,663 532,663 457,436 General government 2,594,766 2,594,766 2,585,391 Public safety 4,797,606 799,844 5,597,450 5,492,950 Community development 470,072 28,561 498,633 596,214 Culture and recreation 685,853 685,853 654,861 Public works 876,213 1,240,159 2,116,372 2,251,000 Sanitation 283,235 283,235 301,864 Debt service: Principal 60,700 364,772 425,472 400,882 Interest 7,433 274,785 282,218 304,015 Capital outlay 109,852 Total expenditures 10,308,541 2,708,121 13,016,662 13,154,465 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (2,423,641) 888,246 (1,535,395) (232,778) Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in 2,040,862 801,533 2,842,395 2,909,198 Operating transfers out (14,320) (1,836,460) (1,850,780) (1,765,354) Acquisition of capital leases 109,852 Total other financing sources (uses) 2,026,542 (1,034,927) 991,615 1,253,696 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures and other financing sources (uses) (397,099) (146,681) (543,780) 1,020,918 Fund balances - beginning of year 1,890,786 9,689,936 11,580,722 10,959,804 Residual equity transfer in 85,000 85,000 Residual equity transfer out (400,000) Fund balances - end of year $1,578,687 $9,543,255 $11,121,942 $11 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Property taxes Other taxes Licenses and permits Fines and forfeitures Use of money and property Intergovernmental Charges for services Miscellaneous Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Legislative and legal General government Public safety Community development Culture and recreation Public works Sanitation Debt service: Principal Interest Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Total other financing sources Deficiency of revenues under expenditures and other financing sources Fund balances - beginning of year Residual equity transfer in Fund balances - end of year Continued 531,739 2,760,617 4,715,654 489,664 707,566 895,219 274,311 68,133 10,442,923 (2,332,247) 2,040,862 (14,320) 2,026,542 (305,705) 1,890,786 B5, 000 $1,670,081 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 6 532,663 2,594,766 4,797,606 470,072 685,853 876,213 283,235 60,700 7,433 10,308,541 (2,423,641) 2,040,862 (14,320) 2,026,542 (397,099) 1,890,786 85,000 $1,578,687 (924) 165,851 (81,952) 19,612 21,713 19,006 (8,924) 7,433 (7,433) 134,382 (91,394) (91,394) ($91,394) = = r M = = M M M = M = = M = = = = r General Fund variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $3,048,489 $3,027,168 ($21,321) 2,970,268 2,891,493 (78,775) 137,563 124,078 (13,485) 110,000 82,504 (27,496) 362,500 368,786 6,286 890,475 850,423 (40,052) 386,758 388,777 2,019 93,063 31,648 (61,415) 111,560 120,023 8,463 8,110,676 7,884,900 (225,776) 531,739 2,760,617 4,715,654 489,664 707,566 895,219 274,311 68,133 10,442,923 (2,332,247) 2,040,862 (14,320) 2,026,542 (305,705) 1,890,786 B5, 000 $1,670,081 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 6 532,663 2,594,766 4,797,606 470,072 685,853 876,213 283,235 60,700 7,433 10,308,541 (2,423,641) 2,040,862 (14,320) 2,026,542 (397,099) 1,890,786 85,000 $1,578,687 (924) 165,851 (81,952) 19,612 21,713 19,006 (8,924) 7,433 (7,433) 134,382 (91,394) (91,394) ($91,394) = = r M = = M M M = M = = M = = = = r = W CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Property taxes Other taxes Fines and forfeitures Intergovernmental Charges for services Miscellaneous Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Legislative and legal General government Public safety Community development Public works Debt service: Principal Interest Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Total other financing uses Deficiency of revenues under expenditures and other financing uses Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued Special Revenue Funds 1,000,556 Variance 200,712 37,465 Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $237,843 $220,079 ($17,764) 2,393,345 2,456,189 62,844 75,000 96,852 21,852 365,871 394,614 28,743 1,971 1,082 (889) 12,000 12,381 381 431,634 415,170 (16,464) 3,517,664 3,596,367 78,703 1,000,556 799,844 200,712 37,465 28,561 8,904 4,350,890 1,240,159 3,110,731 655,998 364,772 291,226 274,785 (274,785) 6,044,909 2,708,121 3,336,788 (2,527,245) 888,246 3,415,491 801,533 801,533 (1,836,460) (1,836,460) (1,034,927) (1,034,927) (3,562,172) (146,681) 3,415,491 9,689,936 9,689,936 $6,127,764 $9,543,255 $3,415,491 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 7 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Property taxes Other taxes Licenses and permits Fines and forfeitures Use of money and property Intergovernmental Charges for services Miscellaneous Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Legislative and legal General government Public safety Community development Culture and recreation Public works Sanitation Debt service: Principal Interest Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Total other financing sources Deficiency of revenues under expenditures and other financing sources Fund balances - beginning of year Residual equity transfer in Fund balances - end of year Totals (Memorandum Only) 2,760,617 2,594,766 Variance 5,716,210 5,597,450 Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $3,286,332 $3,247,247 ($39,085) 5,363,613 5,347,682 (15,931) 137,563 124,078 (13,485) 185,000 179,356 (5,644) 362,500 368,786 6,286 1,256,346 1,245,037 (11,309) 388,729 389,859 1,130 105,063 44,029 (61,034) 543,194 535,193 (81001) 11,628,340 11,481,267 (147,073) 531,739 532,663 (924) 2,760,617 2,594,766 165,851 5,716,210 5,597,450 118,760 527,149 498,633 28,516. 707,566 685,853 21,713 5,246,109 2,116,372 3,129,737 274,311 283,235 (8,924) 724,131 425,472 298,659 282,218 (282,218) 16,487,832 13,016,662 3,471,170 (4,859,492) (1,535,395) 3,324,097 2,842,395 2,842,395 (1,850,780) (1,850,780) 991,615 991,615 - (3,867,877) (543,780) 3,324,097 11,580,722 11,580,722 85,000 85,000 $7,797,845 $11,121,942 $3,324,097 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 8 = = = = = = M = r = M = r r = i = = = rr rr rr rr rr rr r r r r r r r r r r r r� CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Operating revenues: Fines and forfeitures Use of money and property Charges for services Miscellaneous - Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and wages Contractor services Supplies Other Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenues: Local assistance Interest earned on investments Total nonoperating revenues Income before operating transfers Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Net income Retained earnings - beginning of year Retained earnings - end of year Proprietary Fund Types 350,519 Internal Enterprise Service Funds Fund $933,637 36,425 202,125 537 915,495 $1,026,540 2,865 38,234 2,054,122 1,064,774 638,290 501,226 57,113 83,330 9,388 1,289,347 764,775 619,970 434,039 1,054,009 10,765 Total (Memorandum Only) 1994 1993 $933,637 $954,324 202,125 194,074 1,942,035 1,992,840 41,099 13,358 3,118,896 3,154,596 1,258,260 935,265 57,113 83,330 9,388 2,343,356 775,540 1,146,057 781,106 146,996 1,194 9,616 2,084,969 1,069,627 350,519 350,519 352,008 46,221 537 46,758 36,425 396,740 537 397,277 388,433 1,161,515 11,302 1,172,817 1,458,060 12,052 735 12,787 50,194 (1,004,402) (1,004,402) (1,194,038) 169,165 12,037 181,202 314,216 2,502,709 232,877 2,735,586 2,421,370 $2,671,874 $244,914 $2,916,788 $2,735,586 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 9 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - ALL PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Operating revenues: Fines and forfeitures Use of money and property Charges for services Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and wages Contractor services Supplies Other Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenue: Local assistance Interest earned on investments Total nonoperating revenues Income before operating transfers Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Net income (loss) Retained earnings - beginning of year Retained earnings - end of year Continued 682,707 724,686 63,938 147,253 16,545 1,635,129 452,026 638,290 501,226 57,113 83,330 9.388 1.289.347 764,775 329,069 350,519 38,225 46,221 367,294 396,740 819,320 1,161,515 12,052 12,052 (1,004,402) (1,004,402) (173,030) 169,165 2,502,709 2,502,709 $2,329,679 $2,671,674 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 10 44,417 223,460 6,825 63,923 7,157 312,749 21,450 7.996 29,446 342,195 342,195 $342,195 = M= M== M=== r M r M Internal Service Fund Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $1,026,535 $1,026,540 $5 38,234 38,234 1,026,535 1,064,774 38,239 399,740 619,970 (220,230) 557,237 434,039 123,198 956,977 1,054,009 (97,032) 69,558 10,765 (58,793) 78 537 459 78 537 459 69,636 11,302 (58,334) 735 735 70,371 232,877 $303,248 12,037 232,877 $244,914 (58,334) ($58,334) Enterprise Funds Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $949,930 $933,637 ($16,293) 197,325 202,125 4,800 938,900 915,495 (23,405) 11000 2,865 1,865 2,087,155 2,054,122 (33,033) 682,707 724,686 63,938 147,253 16,545 1,635,129 452,026 638,290 501,226 57,113 83,330 9.388 1.289.347 764,775 329,069 350,519 38,225 46,221 367,294 396,740 819,320 1,161,515 12,052 12,052 (1,004,402) (1,004,402) (173,030) 169,165 2,502,709 2,502,709 $2,329,679 $2,671,674 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 10 44,417 223,460 6,825 63,923 7,157 312,749 21,450 7.996 29,446 342,195 342,195 $342,195 = M= M== M=== r M r M Internal Service Fund Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $1,026,535 $1,026,540 $5 38,234 38,234 1,026,535 1,064,774 38,239 399,740 619,970 (220,230) 557,237 434,039 123,198 956,977 1,054,009 (97,032) 69,558 10,765 (58,793) 78 537 459 78 537 459 69,636 11,302 (58,334) 735 735 70,371 232,877 $303,248 12,037 232,877 $244,914 (58,334) ($58,334) rr rr rr rr rr rr r r r r r r r r r r r r r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - ALL PROPRIETARY FUNDS, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 11 Total (Memorandum Only) Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Operating revenues: Fines and forfeitures $949,930 $933,637 ($16,293) Use of money and property 197,325 202,125 4,800 Charges for services 1,965,435 1,942,035 (23,400) Miscellaneous 11000 41,099 40,099 Total operating revenues 3,113,690 3,118,896 5,206 Operating expenses: Salaries and wages 1,082;447 1,258,260 (175,813) Contractor services 1,281,923 935,265 346,658 Supplies 63,938 57,113 6,825 Other 147,253 83,330 63,923 Depreciation 16,545 9,388 7,157 Total operating expenses 2,592,106 2,343,356 248,750 Operating income 521,584 775,540 253,956 Nonoperating revenue: Local assistance 329,069 350,519 21,450 Interest earned on investments 38,303 46,758 8,455 Total nonoperating revenues 367,372 397,277 29,905 Income before operating transfers 888,956 1,172,817 283,861 Operating transfers in 12,787 12,787 Operating transfers out (1,004,402) (1,004,402) Net income (loss) (102,659) 181,202 283,861 Retained earnings - beginning of year 2,735,586 2,735,586 Retained earnings - end of year $2,632,927 $2 91788 $283,861 The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 11 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Non-cash capital and related financing activities in the Parking Fund include a transfer in of fixed assets with a cost of $37,888 and a net book value of $12,594. The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 12 = M = = r = M = = = = = r Proprietary Fund Types Total Internal (Memorandum Only) Enterprise Service 1994 1993 Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income $764,775 $10,765 $775,540 1,069,627 Adjustments to reconcile net operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 9,388 9,388 9,616 Changes in assets and liabilities: Interest receivable on investments (2,256) (354) (2,610) (607) Other receivables (1,072) (1,072) 147,102 Deposits (319,356) (319,356) (227,048) Prepaid expenses (295) (295) (877) Accounts payable 142,298 4,600 146,898 (32,168) Accrued wages (48,604) (5,446) (54,050) (154) General liability claims payable 122,485 122,485 (199,416) Workers' compensation claims payable 219,722 219,722 74,585 Net cash provided by operating activities 864,529 32,121 896,650 840,660 Cash flows from non -capital financing activities: Local assistance received 350,519 350,519 352,008 Operating transfers in 12,052 735 12,787 50,194 Operating transfers out (1,004,402) (1,004,402) (1,194,038) Net cash provided by (used in) noncapital financing activities (641,831) 735 (641,096) (791,836) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Acquisition of fixed assets (50,056) (50,056) (3,351) Residual equity transfer in 400,000 Residual equity transfer out (85,000) (85,000) Net cash provided by (used in) capital and related financing activities (50,056) (85,000) (135,056) 396,649 Cash flows from investing activities: Interest and dividends on investments 46,221 537 46,758 36,425 Net cash provided by investing activities 46,221 537 46,758 36,425 Net increase (decrease) in cash 218,863 (51,607) 167,256 481,898 Cash, cash equivalents and investments - beginning of year 706,041 919,012 1,625,053 1,143,155 Cash, cash equivalents and investments - end of year $924,904 $867,405 $1 79 $1 62 Non-cash capital and related financing activities in the Parking Fund include a transfer in of fixed assets with a cost of $37,888 and a net book value of $12,594. The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 12 = M = = r = M = = = = = r ' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IJune 30, 1994 ' A. Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies: ' 1. Reporting Entity In evaluating how to define the government for financial reporting purposes, management has considered all potential component units. The decision to include a potential component unit in the reporting entity was made by applying the criteria set forth by generally accepted accounting principles. The basic - but not the only - criterion for including a potential component unit within the reporting entity is the governing body's ability to ' exercise oversight responsibility. The most significant manifestation of this ability is financial interdependency. Other manifestations of the ability to exercise oversight responsibility include, but are not ' limited to: the selection of governing authority, the designation of management, the ability to significantly influence operations, and accountability for fiscal ' matters. A second criterion used in evaluating potential component units is the scope of public service. Application of this criterion involves considering whether the activity benefits the government and/or its citizens, or whether the activity is conducted within the geographic boundaries of the government and is generally available to its citizens. A third criterion used to ' evaluate potential component units for inclusion or exclusion from the reporting entity is the existence of special financing relationships, regardless of whether the government is able to exercise oversight responsi- bilities. Based upon the application of these criteria, the following is a brief review of each potential component unit addressed in defining the government's ' reporting entity. Included in the general purpose financial statements of the City are the Downtown Business Area Enhancement ' District (formerly the Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District), the Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard District, the Hermosa Beach Parking Authority and the Hermosa Beach Street Lighting District. Although these entities are legally separate from the City, the City has oversight responsibility and/or direct legislative authority through the City Council. The oversight responsibility is determined on the basis of budget adoption, taxing authority, special financial relationships, scope of public services and appointment of the governing boards. ' Continued 1 13 Im CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued: 1. Reporting Entity, Continued Activities of these component units are reported in separate Special Revenue Funds, except the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District, which is reported in an Enterprise Fund. 2. Description Of Funds Continued The accounts of the City are organized and operated on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is defined as a separate fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts. These funds and account groups are established for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions or limitations. In accordance with the City's municipal code and budget, several different types of funds and account groups are used to record the City's financial transactions. For financial reporting, they have been grouped and are presented in this report as follows: Governmental Fund Types General Funds - The purpose of these funds is to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Special Revenue Funds - The purpose of these funds is to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. Proprietary Fund Types Enterprise Funds - The purpose of these funds is to account for those operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business or where the governing body has decided that the deter- mination of revenues earned, costs incurred and/or net income is necessary for management accountability. 14 1 n I� CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued ' June 30, 1994 ' A. Summar Of Significant Accounting Summary g g Policies, Continued: ' 2. Description Of Funds, Continued Proprietary Fund Types, Continued ' Internal Service Fund - The purpose of this fund is to account for the financing of goods and services ' provided by one department to other departments of the City on a cost -reimbursement basis. Fiduciary Fund Type Agency Fund - The purpose of this fund is to account for assets which are held by the City as an agent for individuals, private organizations and other ' governmental units and/or other funds. These funds are custodial in nature and do not involve the measurement of results of operations. ' Account Groups General Fixed Assets Account Group - The purpose of ' this account group is to maintain control and cost information on capital assets owned by the City, other than those accounted for in proprietary funds. General Lona -Term Debt Account Group - The purpose of this account group is to account for the unmatured long-term obligations of the City, other ' than those accounted for in the proprietary funds. 3. Basis Of Accounting ' The accounting and reporting treatment applied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus. All governmental funds are accounted for on a spending or "financial flow" measurement focus. Accordingly, only current assets and current liabilities generally are included on their balance sheets. Governmental funds' operating statements present increases (revenues and other financial sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financial uses) in net current assets. IContinued 1 15 A CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued: 3. Basis Of Accounting, Continued Continued All governmental fund types and the agency fund are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting wherein revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become measurable and available to pay liabilities of the current period. Revenues considered susceptible to accrual include property taxes collected within 60 days of year-end, charges for services, federal and state grants, sales taxes and interest. Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the fund liability is incurred, if measurable, except for principal on general long-term debt, which is recognized when due. All proprietary fund types are accounted for on a flow of economic resources measurement focus, meaning that all assets and all liabilities (whether current or noncurrent) associated with their activity are included on their balance sheets. Reported fund equity (net total assets) is segregated into contributed capital and retained earnings components. Proprietary Fund Type operating statements present increases (revenue) and decreases (expenses) in net total assets. Proprietary funds are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting wherein revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they are earned and expenses are recognized in the accounting period incurred. 16 LJ II L, ' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued ' June 30, 1994 A. Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued: 4. Budgetary Principles The City is required by its municipal code to adopt an annual budget on or before June 30 for the ensuing fiscal year. From the effective date of the budget, the amounts stated therein as proposed expenditures become ' appropriations to the various City departments. The City Council may amend the budget by motion during the fiscal year and the City Manager may transfer funds from one object account to another within the same fund. ' Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations at the fund level. Appropriations lapse at the end of the fiscal year. Supplemental appropriations were made ' during the fiscal year 1994. These supplements increased the total appropriations. IContinued 17 Budget information is presented for the General, Special ' Revenue, and Proprietary fund types on the same basis as generally accepted accounting principles. Budgeted revenue and expenditure amounts represent the original ' budget modified for adjustments during the year. Encumbrance accounting is used when appropriate in order to control expenditures; remaining reserved encumbrances are cancelled at year-end. 5. "Totals Memorandum Only)" Columns Columns of the accompanying combined general purpose financial statements captioned "Totals (memorandum only)" do not present consolidated financial information and are presented only to facilitate financial analysis. The data in these columns do not present financial position, results of operations, or cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Interfund ' eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. IContinued 17 A CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued: 6. Cash And Investments The City pools cash resources from all funds in order to facilitate the management of cash and achieve the goal of obtaining the highest yield with the greatest safety and least risk. The balance in the pooled cash account is available to meet current operating requirements. Cash in excess of current requirements is invested in various interest-bearing accounts and other investments for varying terms. Cash in the special revenue funds, including the Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund, is restricted to use for purposes stipulated by the fund. The Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Fund is used for law enforcement purposes and is intended to supplement, not replace or reduce, normal appropriations for the operation of the City's Police Department. Investments are carried at cost except for investments in the deferred compensation agency fund which are reported at market value. Unrealized losses on investments are not recorded when their market values decline below cost unless such declines are considered permanent. The City intends to either hold the investments until maturity or until market values equal or exceed cost. Interest income on investments is allocated to all funds on the basis of monthly cash and investment balances. Cash and cash equivalents include amounts in demand deposits and investment funds as well as short-term investments with a maturity date within three months of the date acquired by the City. 7. Inventory Continued Inventory, consisting of gasoline, is stated at cost on an average cost basis and is controlled by a perpetual inventory system and adjusted to reflect periodic physical counts. These inventories are recorded as expenditures when used. 18 7-7 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued ' June 30, 1994 A. Summar Of Significant gnificant Accounting Policies, Continued: 8. Property And Equipment General fixed assets are not capitalized in the funds ' used to acquire or construct them. Instead, capital acquisition and construction are reflected as expenditures in governmental funds, and the related ' assets are reported in the General Fixed Assets Account Group. Fixed assets acquired or constructed for Proprietary Funds are capitalized in their respective individual funds. All purchased fixed assets are valued ' at cost where historical records are available and at an estimated historical cost where no historical records exist. Donated fixed assets are valued at their estimated fair market value on the date received. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend asset lives are not capitalized. Public domain ("infrastructure") general fixed assets consisting of roads, bridges, curbs and gutters, streets, ' and sidewalks, drainage systems and lighting systems are not capitalized, as these assets are immovable and of value only to the City. ' Depreciation of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: iBuilding and structures 50 years Improvements 20 years ' Equipment, machinery and vehicles 7-10 years Depreciation of all exhaustible property and equipment used by the Proprietary Funds is charged as an expense ' against their respective operations. Depreciation of property and equipment in the General Fixed Assets Account Group is calculated only for financial analysis ' and is not recorded in the accounts of the governmental type funds. Accumulated depreciation relating to such assets is reported in the General Fixed Assets Account Group. No interest costs were capitalized during the fiscal year. 1 Continued 1 19 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued: 9. Long -Term Liabilities Liabilities for long-term debt are recognized as a liability of a governmental fund when due. For other long-term obligations, only the portion expected to be financed from expendable available financial resources is reported as a fund liability of a governmental fund. The remaining portion of the obligation is reported in the General Long -Term Debt Account Group. Long-term liabilities expected to be financed from proprietary fund operations are accounted for in those funds. 10. Fund Equity Reservations of fund balances of governmental funds and retained earnings of proprietary funds are created to either (1) satisfy legal covenants, including state law, that require a portion of the fund balance be segregated or (2) identify the portion of the fund balance not available for future expenditures. 11. Property Taxes Continued Property taxes attach as an enforceable lien on property as of July 1 each year. Taxes are levied on March 1 and are payable in two installments: December 10 and April 10 of each year. The County of Los Angeles, California ("County") bills and collects the property taxes and remits them to the City according to a payment schedule established by the County. City property tax revenues are recognized when received in cash except at year-end when they are accrued pursuant to the modified accrual basis of accounting. The City recognizes as revenues, at June 30, "available" taxes, or those collected within 60 days. The County is permitted by State law to levy taxes at 1% of full market value (at time of purchase) and can increase the property tax rate no more than 2% per year. The City receives a share of this basic levy propor- tionate to what it received during the 1976 to 1978 period. 20 0 I I F� ' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ' NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 A. Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued: ' 12. Interfund Transactions Quasi -external transactions are accounted for as ' revenues, expenditures (governmental fund types) or expenses (proprietary fund types). Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for expenditures/ ' expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund are recovered as a reduction in expenditures/expense in the charging fund and an expenditures/expense in the user fund. All other inter - fund transactions are reported as operating transfers in/out. Non-recurring or non -routine permanent transfers of equity are reported as residual equity transfers. ' 13. Compensated Absences City employees have vested interests in varying levels of vacation, sick leave and compensatory time based on their length of employment. It is the policy of the City to pay all accumulated vacation pay and a portion of sick pay when an employee retires or terminates. The ' liabilities for compensated absences are recorded in the governmental fund types (current portion) and in the General Long -Term Debt Account Group (long-term portion). ' The liabilities for compensated absences of Proprietary Funds are recorded in those funds when incurred. ' 14. Reclassification Of 1993 Account Balances Certain 1993 account balances have been reclassified to ' conform to current year presentations. Continued 1 21 I:l CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Cash, Cash Equivalents And Investments: The City pools its cash, cash equivalents and investments of all funds with the City Treasurer for investing, except for certain restricted funds which are held and invested by independent outside custodians through contractual agreements. These restricted funds include cash held by trustee and deferred compensation plan deposits. The investments made by the City Treasurer are limited to those allowable under State statutes as incorporated into the City's investment policy. However, the City Treasurer follows an investment policy that is more conservative than that allowed by State statute. The City's investment policy allows investing in U.S. Treasury obligations, obligations of state and local agencies, investment funds of state and local agencies and certificates of deposit, medium-term notes, and Banker's acceptances. 1. Deposits 2. Continued At June 30, 1994, the carrying amount of the City's deposits was $1,357,928 and the bank balances were $1,391,022. Of the bank balance, $941,645 was covered by federal depository insurance or by collateral held by the City's agent in the City's name, and $449,377 was covered by collateral held in a pledging bank's trust department in the City's name. The California Government Code requires California financial institutions to secure a City's deposits by pledging government securities as collateral. The market value of pledged securities must equal at least 110% of the City's deposits. Investments The City's investments to give an indication by the City. 11 at year-end are categorized below , of the level of credit risk assumed Category 1 - Insured or registered, or securities held by the City or its agent in the City's name. Category 2 - Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the counterparty's trust department or agent in the City's name. 22 M �© M i s M M � M = � M = i M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 B. Cash, Cash Equivalents And Investments, Continued: 2. Investments, Continued Category 3 - Uninsured and unregistered securities held by the counterparty, or by its trust department or agent but not in the City's name. At June 30, 1994, the City's investments consisted of the following: Category 1 Other U.S. Instrumentality securities $2,994,657 Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Fund $1,876,490 Local Agency Investment Fund 7,612,000 Investments for deferred compensation plan 1,242,776 Total investments $2,994,657 $10,731,266 C. Lease Receivables: The City leases a portion of the Hermosa Beach Community Center to civic and cultural organizations. These leases are accounted for as operating leases by the City. The future minimum rental receivables under these noncancellable operating leases are as follows: Year Ending June 30, 1995 $278,835 1996 181,718 $460,553 Lease income for fiscal year 1994 was $313,375, with $133,375 reflected in the General Fund and $180,000 in the Downtown Enhancement Fund, an Enterprise Fund. Continued 23 Carrying Amount $2,994,657 1,876,490 7,612,000 1.242.776 $13.725,923 Market Value $2,939,375 1,876,490 7,612,000 1,242.776 $13,670,641 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 D. Property And Equipment: Property and equipment of the Enterprise Funds (Parking and Downtown Enhancement Funds) at June 30, 1994 consists of: Land $1,859,864 Buildings 103,493 Improvements 91,473 Machinery and equipment 133,608 Vehicles 126,738 2,315,176 Less accumulated depreciation 328,123 $1,987,053 The Proposition "A" and Proposition "C" Transit Enterprise Funds had no fixed assets at June 30, 1994. Activity in the General Fixed Assets Account Group for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994 was as follows: Balance Balance June 30, 1993 Additions Deletions June 30, 1994 Land $15,943,218 $15,943,218 Buildings, structures and improvements 3,509,087 $381,099 $37,845 3,852,341 Machinery and equipment 2,131,540 224,673 27,745 2,328,468 Vehicles 1,448,425 42,622 30,116 1,460,931 Construction -in - progress 25,228 20,861 46,089 - 23,057,498 669,255 141,795 23,584,958 Less accumulated depreciation: Buildings, structures and improvements 1,788,982 68,634 25,294 1,832,322 Machinery and equipment 1,246,132 156,737 36,715 1,366,154 Vehicles 821,637 127,501 38,962 910,176 3,856,751 352,872 100,971 4,108,652 Total $19,200,747 $316,383 $40,824 $19,476,306 Continued 24 t CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 D. Property And Equipment, Continued: Included in machinery and equipment and vehicles in the General Fixed Assets Account Group are capitalized leased assets as follows: Machinery and equipment $46,220 Vehicles 109,851 Total 156,071 Less accumulated amortization (109,792) $46,279 E. Obligations Under Capital Leases And Certificates Of Participation: The City has entered into various noncancellable long-term equipment capital leases which are accounted for in its General Long -Term Debt Account Group. The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under these capital leases: Lease payments for the year ending June 30, 1995 $49,305 Less amounts representing interest (3,026) Present value of future minimum lease payments $46,279 The equipment lease obligations are primarily funded from general fund resources. Continued 25 E. Fa CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Obligations Under Capital Leases And Certificates Of Participation, Continued: During fiscal year 1990, the City entered into an agreement with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for the purchase of 19.5 acres of railroad right-of-way property which bisects the City. The property is restricted for open space use. Parcel A (800 of the property) was purchased for $6 million; $4.6 million of the $6 million was financed through a pooled issue of Certificates of Participation (COPS). Payments on the COPs are made from proceeds of the voter - approved 4% Utility User Tax (UUT). The remaining 20%, Parcel B, will be purchased with accumulated UUT funds, if available, or with other City Special Revenue funds. The annual debt requirements for the COPs are as follows: Year Ending June 30, 1995 $613,935 1996 613,825 1997 611,650 1998 612,187 1999 610,210 Thereafter 1,834,443 4,896,250 Less amounts representing interest (1,156,250) Present value of COPS obligation $3,740,000 In relation to the Certificates of Participation, the City has a deposit of $549,377 held by a trustee. The deposit is a requirement of the Certificates of Participation agreement and will act as the final payment on the certificates. Risk Management: The City maintains an internal service fund to account for the City's general liability and workers' compensation claims, automobile, property, unemployment and Medicare insurance. Continued 26 A t r i CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Risk Management, Continued: The City is self-insured for individual workers' compensation claims up to $300,000 and for each general liability claim up to $250,000, increased from $100,000 at June 30, 1994. The City is insured above the self-insured retention for general liability insurance coverage, up to a maximum of $10,000,000 per occurrence, as a member of the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA). Settled claims have not exceeded this coverage in any of the past three fiscal years. The ICRMA is a joint exercise of powers authority organized and operating pursuant to the California Government Code. ICRMA was formed in 1980 pursuant to joint exercise of power agreements for insurance and risk management purposes, which, as amended, enable ICRMA to provide programs of risk sharing, insurance and risk management services in connection with liability, property, and workers' compensation claims and to assist members in establishing financial reserves through the sale of Certificates of Participation. In January 1987, Certificates of Participation in an aggregate principal amount of $30,210,000 were sold by ICRMA to fund the joint self- insurance programs. Under the coverage agreement, member cities are assessed annual premiums based on an actuarially determined amount. Principal and interest due with respect to the certificates will be repaid from the premiums assessed. The participation percentage that the City has in ICRMA is as follows: 2.99% for losses occurring July 1, 1993 to July 1, 1994, 3.64% for losses occurring July 1, 1992 to July 1, 1993, 4.53% for losses occurring July 1, 1991 to July 1, 1992, 3.71% for losses occurring July 1, 1990 to July 1, 1991, 3.95% for losses occurring prior to that date. The City is liable for possible subsequent assessments and withdrawal costs under the terms of the membership agreement. The City has entered into contracts with service agents who supervise and administer the City's general liability and workers' compensation insurance program. Claim loss estimates are determined by the service agent based on the nature of an individual claim. The loss estimates includes amounts for future compensation, medical, legal and administrative fees. The City also includes in loss.estimates claims incurred but not reported (IBNR) using an IBNR factor which is developed utilizing historical claims data. Reimbursement requests are submitted to the City on a monthly basis as claims are paid. Continued 1 27 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA I NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 F. Risk Management, Continued: The workers' compensation and general liability claims payable of $1,021,704 and $677,295, respectively, reported in the Fund at June 30, 1994 are based on the requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 10, which requires that a liability for claims be reported if information prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Changes in the Fund's claims liability amount in fiscal years 1993 and 1994 were: Current- Beginning- Year Claims Balance Of -Fiscal- And At Year Changes In Claim Fiscal Liability Estimates Payments Year -End Workers' Compensation 1992-1993 $727,397 $403,610 ($329,025) $801,982 1993-1994 $801,982 $528,122 ($308,400) $1,021,704 General Liability 1992-1993 $754,226 ($62,737) ($136,679) $554,810 1993-1994 $554,810 $380,853 ($258,368) $677,295 G. General Long -Term Debt Account Group: Activity in the General Long -Term Debt Account Group for the year ended June 30, 1994 was as follows: Capital Lease Obligation To Be Provided By Accrued COPs General Special Vacation (UUT Fund) Fund Revenue Total Balance - June 30, 1993 $923,069 $4,085,000 $100,680 $42,511 $5,151,260 Retirements 91,551 345,000 76,285 20,627 533,463 Balance - June 30, 1994 $831,518 $3,740,000 $24,395 $21,884 $4,617,797 Continued 28 1 11 r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Deferred Compensation Plans: The City offers its employees two deferred compensation plans ("Plans") created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The Plans permit all eligible employees to execute an individual agreement with the City for amounts earned by them, to be paid at a future date when certain circumstances are met. These circumstances include termination by reason of retirement, death, disability or other events as provided for in the Plans. Employees may contribute up to 25% of their annual compensation, not to exceed $7,500 in any year, into the deferred compensation plan. All amounts of compensation deferred under this Plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, are (until paid or available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the City (without being restricted to the provisions of benefits under the Plan), subject only to the claims of the City's general creditors. Participants' rights under the Plans are equal to those to general creditors of the City in an amount equal to the fair value of the deferred account for each participant. At June 30, 1994, the City's deferred compensation plans accumulated assets and liabilities were $1,242,776 at market value, including investment earnings and are reported in the Agency Fund. It is the opinion of management that the City has no liability for losses under the Plan but does have the duty of due care that would be required of any ordinary prudent investor. The City believes that it is unlikely it will use the assets of the deferred compensation plan to satisfy the claims of general creditors in the future. Public Employee Retirement System: 1. Plan Description Continued The City contributes to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS), an agent multiple -employer public employee retirement system that acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public entities within the State of California. The City's payroll for employees covered by the PERS for the year ended June 30, 1994 was $6,015,864 compared with a total payroll of $7,189,367. 29 t , 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Deferred Compensation Plans: The City offers its employees two deferred compensation plans ("Plans") created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The Plans permit all eligible employees to execute an individual agreement with the City for amounts earned by them, to be paid at a future date when certain circumstances are met. These circumstances include termination by reason of retirement, death, disability or other events as provided for in the Plans. Employees may contribute up to 25% of their annual compensation, not to exceed $7,500 in any year, into the deferred compensation plan. All amounts of compensation deferred under this Plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, are (until paid or available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the City (without being restricted to the provisions of benefits under the Plan), subject only to the claims of the City's general creditors. Participants' rights under the Plans are equal to those to general creditors of the City in an amount equal to the fair value of the deferred account for each participant. At June 30, 1994, the City's deferred compensation plans accumulated assets and liabilities were $1,242,776 at market value, including investment earnings and are reported in the Agency Fund. It is the opinion of management that the City has no liability for losses under the Plan but does have the duty of due care that would be required of any ordinary prudent investor. The City believes that it is unlikely it will use the assets of the deferred compensation plan to satisfy the claims of general creditors in the future. Public Employee Retirement System: 1. Plan Description Continued The City contributes to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS), an agent multiple -employer public employee retirement system that acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public entities within the State of California. The City's payroll for employees covered by the PERS for the year ended June 30, 1994 was $6,015,864 compared with a total payroll of $7,189,367. 29 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Public Employee Retirement System: Plan Description, Continued All full-time City employees are eligible to participate in the PERS. Benefits vest after five years of service. Public safety and other employees who retire at or after age 50 and 60, respectively, with 5 years of credited service, are entitled to an annual retirement benefit, payable monthly for life, in an amount equal to 2% of their average salary during their last year of employment for each year of credited service. PERS also provides death and disability benefits. These benefits provisions and all other requirements are established by contract with PERS. City employees are required to contribute to the PERS on the basis of 90 of PERS reportable salary for public safety employees and 7% for all other employees; however, the City, on behalf of the employees, makes this contri- bution. The City is required to contribute the remaining amounts to fund PERS, using the actuarial basis recom- mended by the PERS actuaries and actuarial consultants and adopted by the Board of Administration, with the contribution rate at June 30, 1994 for police safety employees at 19.351%, fire safety employees at 17.2070 and other employees at 6.466%. These benefit provisions and contribution obligations are established under the contract with PERS. Membership date on number of total participants in the Plan is currently not available. 2. Funding Status And ProgressL Continued The amount shown below as the "pension benefit obligation" is a standardized disclosure measure of the present value of pension benefits, adjusted for the effects of projected salary increases and step -rate benefits, estimated to be payable in the future as a result of employee service to date. The measure is intended to help users assess the funding status of PERS on a going -concern basis, assess progress made in accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due, and make comparisons among employers. The measure is the actuarial present value of credited projected benefits and is independent of the funding methods used to determine contributions to the PERS. 30 1 1 1 1 J 1 A 1 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 I. Public Employee Retirement System, Continued: 2. Funding Status And Progress, Continued Continued The pension benefit obligation was computed as part of an actuarial valuation performed as of June 30, 1993 (date of most recent actuarial valuation). Significant actuarial assumptions used in the valuation include (a) a compounded annual rate of return on the investment of present and future assets of 8.750, (b) projected compounded annual salary increases of 4.500W, attributable to inflation, (c) across the board real salary increases of 0.75%, (d) additional projected salary increase of 1.750-. a year for "non -safety" employees and 2.006 a year for "safety" employees, attributable to seniority/merit, and (e) no post-retirement benefit increases. The total unfunded pension benefit obligation applicable to the City's employees was $88,544 at June 30, 1993 and is as follows: Pension benefit obligation: Retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits and terminated employees not yet receiving benefits $11,175,830 Current employees: Accumulated employee contributions including allocated investment earnings Employer -financed vested Employer -financed non -vested Total pension benefit obligation Net assets available for benefits, at cost (market value = $31,364,668) Unfunded pension benefit obligation 31 6,942,140 7,921,792 427,412 26,467,174 26,378,630 $88,544 I. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA i NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 Public Employee Retirement System, Continued: 3. Actuarially Determined Contribution Requirements And Contributions Made PERS uses the Entry Age Normal Actuarial Cost Method, which is a projected benefit cost method that takes into account those benefits that are expected to be earned in the future as well as those already accrued. Under this method the normal cost for an employee is the level amount which would fund the projected benefit if it were paid annually from the date of employment until retirement. PERS uses a modification of the Entry Age Cost Method in which the employer's total normal cost is expressed as a level percentage of payroll. PERS also uses the level percentage of payroll method to amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities over a period which expires in the year 2011. The significant actuarial assumptions used to compute the actuarially determined contributions used to compute the actuarially determined contribution requirement are the same as those used to compute the pension benefit obligation, as previously described. The total employer contribution to PERS for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994 amounted to $1,143,857, which was entirely paid by the City. The contribution was made in accordance with actuarially determined requirements computed through an actuarial valuation performed as of July 1, 1993. The contribution consisted of $600,253 for normal cost (9.98% of current covered payroll) and $127,591 for amortization of the unfunded actuarial accrued liability (2.12% of current covered payroll). There were no employee contributions during the fiscal year. 4. Trend Information Trend information gives an indication of the progress made in accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due. Ten-year trend information is available beginning with fiscal year 1987-88 and, therefore, seven- year historical trend information is presented as follows: Continued I 32 1 W -AW MGM MIM M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 I. Public Employee Retirement System, Continued: 4. Trend Information, Continued Net Assets Available For Benefits As A Employer Percentage Unfunded Pension Contributions Net Assets Of Pension Unfunded Benefit Obligation As A Percentage Available Pension Benefit Benefit Pension Benefit Annual Covered As A Percentage Employer Of Annual Covered Year For Benefits(1) Obligation Obligation Obligation Payroll Of Covered Payroll Contributions(2) Payroll 1993-94 $26,378,630 $26,467,174 99.67% $88,544 $6,015,864 1.47$ $727,844 12.10$ 1992-93 23,775,722 25,965,631 91.57% 2,189,909 6,589,133 33.24% 752,487 (3) 11.42% 1991-92 21,496,517 23,422,116 91.78% 1,925,599 6,523,609 29.52% 793,147 12.16% 1990-91 19,715,715 21,596,014 91.29% 1,880,299 6,226,990 30.20% 698,860 11.22% 1989-90 17,590,626 19,287,551 91.20% 1,696,925 5,756,456 29.48% 683,262 11.87% 1988-89 15,287,585 17,562,971 87.04% 2,275,386 5,069,070 44.89% 607,200 (3) 11.98% 1987-88 13,483,690 16,165,521 83.41% 2,681,831 4,575,684 58.61% 660,347 14.43% (1) At Cost. (2) Contributions were made in accordance with actuarially determined requirements. (3) Employer rates decreased overall; therefore, contributions were less than the previous year even though covered payroll increased. 5. Other Post -Employment Benefits In addition to the pension benefits described above, the City provides post -employment health care benefits, in accordance with negotiated Memoranda of Understanding, for employees represented by the Management Association and General, Supervisory or Administrative Bargaining Units represented by the California Teamsters Public, Professional and Medical Employees, Union. Eligible employees are service retirees, age 55 or over, with a minimum of ten years continuous service with the City. An amount of (1) $60 (or cost of policy, whichever is less) is provided for a minimum of ten years continuous service with the City, or (2) $80 (or cost of policy,, whichever is less) is provided for a minimum of twenty years continuous service with the City, payable directly to the medical insurance provider. Estimated benefits payable are budgeted each fiscal year. For fiscal year 1993-94, four retirees received benefits at a total cost of $2,540. Continued 33 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 J. Interfund Accounts: Interfund Balances Individual fund interfund balances of receivables and payables at June 30, 1994 were as follows: Fund Special Revenue Funds: Parks and recreation facilities Grants Interfund Balances Due From Due To $17,600 $17,600 Total $17,600 $17,600 Operating Transfers In/Out A reconciliation of operating transfers in/out is detailed below: Operating Operating Transfers Transfers Out In General Fund $14,320 $2,040,862 Special Revenue Funds 1,836,460 801,533 Enterprise Funds 1,004,402 12,052 Internal Service Fund 735 Total operating transfers in/out $2,855,182 $2,855,182 Residual Equity Transfers During 1993-94, the Insurance Internal Service Fund transferred $85,000 to the General Fund. Continued 34 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 K. Fund Equity: Fund balances/retained earnings at June 30, 1994 have been reserved/designated for the following purposes: Continued 35 Special General Revenue Enterprise Fund Funds Funds Designated for: Affordable housing $111,831 Contingencies 1,384,453 Disaster preparedness 17,500 Telephone system 60,000 Sewer contingencies $100,000 Total designations $1,573,784 $100,000 Reserved for: Inventory $4,903 Bike path $39,691 Strand walkway 92,127 Capital outlay $9,592 Parking facility 5,254 VPD land acquisition 105,000 Total reserves $4 903 $131,818 $119,846 Continued 35 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 L. Segment Information For Enterprise Funds: The City maintains four Enterprise Funds which provide parking and transit services. Segment information for the year ended June 30, 1994 is as follows: Continued 36 Downtown Proposition "A" Proposition "C" Total Enhancement Parking Transit Transit Enterprise Fund Fund Fund Fund Funds Operating revenue $197,325 $1,842,133 $3,670 $10,994 $2,054,122 Depreciation 1,955 7,433 9,388 Operating income (loss) 60,031 1,067,295 (202,547) (180,004) 764,775 Nonoperating revenues: Local assistance 175,523 174,996 350,519 Interest earned on investments 22,159 9,635 6,377 8,050 46,221 Transfers: Operating transfers in 137 11,787 22 106 12,052 Operating transfers out (1,160) (1,003,242) (1,004,402) Net income (loss) 81,167 105,475 (20,625) 3,148 169,165 Current contributed capital 34,844 34,844 Property and equipment: Additions 50,057 50,057 Retirements 9,800 9,800 Net working capital 435,970 77,497 53,703 152,495 719,665 Total assets 1,098,186 1,634,926 64,602 173,749 2,971,463 Total equity 1,052,500 1,448,020 53,703 152,495 2,706,718 Continued 36 1 1 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued June 30, 1994 M. Contributed Capital: During the year, contributed capital increased and decreased by the following amounts: Total contributed capital $581,415 $12,594 $85,000 $509,009 Of the $474,165 contributed capital balance in the Internal Service Fund as of June 30, 1994, $400,000 reflects a contingency for insurance claims. N. Commitments And Contingencies: In 1983, the Parking Authority issued $6,400,000 of 1983 Series Floating Rate Monthly Demand Certificates of Participation. The proceeds of the Certificates of Participation (COPs) were used for payment and/or reimbursement of costs incurred by a private partnership for construction of the parking facilities ("Project"). Concurrently with the issuance of the COPs, the Parking Authority purchased the Project under an Installment Purchase Agreement (IPA) and simultaneously resold it to the partner- ship under an Installment Sales Agreement (ISA). No gain or loss was recognized on the sale and repurchase. The COPs represent proportionate interests in the ISA, are collater- alized by a deed of trust on the Project, and are an obligation of the partnership. The COPS and associated transactions are not reflected in the accompanying general purpose financial statements as neither the faith and credit, nor the taxing authority of the Parking Authority or the City are pledged or obligated in any manner to repay the COPs. O. Expenditures Exceed Appropriations In A Special Revenue Fund: Expenditures for the Utility User Tax Special Revenue Fund exceeded its appropriations by $501 during fiscal year 1994. 37 Contributed Contributed Capital Capital July 1, June 30, 1993 Additions Deletions 1994 Enterprise Fund: Parking $22,250 $12,594 $34,844 Internal Service Fund 559,165 - $85,000 474,165 Total contributed capital $581,415 $12,594 $85,000 $509,009 Of the $474,165 contributed capital balance in the Internal Service Fund as of June 30, 1994, $400,000 reflects a contingency for insurance claims. N. Commitments And Contingencies: In 1983, the Parking Authority issued $6,400,000 of 1983 Series Floating Rate Monthly Demand Certificates of Participation. The proceeds of the Certificates of Participation (COPs) were used for payment and/or reimbursement of costs incurred by a private partnership for construction of the parking facilities ("Project"). Concurrently with the issuance of the COPs, the Parking Authority purchased the Project under an Installment Purchase Agreement (IPA) and simultaneously resold it to the partner- ship under an Installment Sales Agreement (ISA). No gain or loss was recognized on the sale and repurchase. The COPs represent proportionate interests in the ISA, are collater- alized by a deed of trust on the Project, and are an obligation of the partnership. The COPS and associated transactions are not reflected in the accompanying general purpose financial statements as neither the faith and credit, nor the taxing authority of the Parking Authority or the City are pledged or obligated in any manner to repay the COPs. O. Expenditures Exceed Appropriations In A Special Revenue Fund: Expenditures for the Utility User Tax Special Revenue Fund exceeded its appropriations by $501 during fiscal year 1994. 37 �900 ,,Do 03 n cr c r+� o� ca a S �C CD 3c cu :3a L] GENERAL FUND The General Fund accounts for all revenues and expenditures used to finance the traditional services associated with a municipal government which are not accounted for in other funds. In Hermosa Beach these services include general government, public safety, community development, culture and recreation, public works, and sanitation. r r 1 38 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS - GENERAL FUND June 30, 1994 And 1993 1994 Assets: Cash, cash equivalents and investments $1,940,627 Interest receivable on investments 22,319 Other receivables 1,202,596 Inventory 4,903 Total assets $3,170,445 Liabilities: 1993 $2,238,990 22,270 1,224,856 7,023 $3,493,139 Accounts payable $421,725 $222,244 Accrued wages 287,846 491,733 Refundable deposits 223,921 260,777 Deferred revenue 658,266 627,599 Total liabilities 1,591,758 1,602,353 Fund balances: Reserved: Inventory 4,903 7,023 Unreserved: Designated: Asset replacement 130,773 Affordable housing 111,831 111,831 Contingencies 1,384,453 1,368,159 City Hall automation 193,000 Disaster preparedness 17,500 20,000 Telephone system 60,000 60,000 Total fund balances 1,578,687 1,890,786 Total liabilities and fund balances $3,170,445 $3,493,139 KK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES For The Years Ended June 30, 1994 And 1993 40 1994 1993 Revenues: Property taxes $3,027,168 $3,305,488 Other taxes 2,891,493 2,871,985 Licenses and permits 124,078 170,913 Fines and forfeitures 82,504 89,454 Use of money and property 368,786 437,463 Intergovernmental 850,423 747,175 Charges for services 388,777 461,567 Miscellaneous 31,648 890,893 Interest earned on investments 120,023 128,554 Total revenues 7,884,900 9,103,492 Expenditures: Current: Legislative 532,663 457,436 General government 2,594,766 2,585,391 Public safety 4,797,606 4,835,261 Community development 470,072 547,702 Culture and recreation 685,853 654,861 Public works 876,213 1,006,928 Sanitation 283,235 301,864 Debt service: Principal 60,700 65,320 Interest 7,433 8,488 Capital outlay 109,852 Total expenditures 10,308,541 10,573,103 Deficiency of revenues under expenditures (2,423,641) (1,469,611) Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in 2,040,862 2,105,678 Operating transfers out (14,320) (50,194) Acquisition of capital leases 109,852 Total other financing sources 2,026,542 2,165,336 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures and other financing sources (397,099) 695,725 Fund balances - beginning of year 1,890,786 1,595,061 Residual equity transfer in 85,000 Residual equity transfer out (400,000) Fund balances - end of year $1,578,687 $1,890,786 40 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are used to account for revenues derived from specific taxes or other earmarked revenue sources. They are usually required by statute, charter provision, local ordinance, of Federal grant regulation to record particular operating or capital functions of the City. Special Revenue Funds of the City of Hermosa Beach are = outlined below: Lighting Fund - This fund is used to account for the Lighting Assessment District, which was created for street lighting purposes pursuant to Street and Highway Code 22500-22679. State Gas Tax Fund - This fund is used to account for the City's share of state gasoline tax, which is restricted for use on public streets. Restricted Transportation Development Act funds from Los Angeles County Transportation Commission for the Strand Walkway Project and Bicycle Path Project are also accounted for in this fund. County Gas Tax Fund - This fund is used to account for County Aid to Cities funds for use on eligible streets of general countywide interest. Park Recreation Facility Tax Fund - This fund is used to account for revenue from subdivision fees and park or recreation facility tax fees on new dwellings. Generally, the funds are to be used for acquisition, improvement and expansion of park or recreational facilities. Utility Users Tax Railroad Right Of Way Fund - This fund is used to account for 4% of the 10% utility users tax which is pledged for lease payments relating to certificates of participation for the purchase of open space property. 6% UUT Fund - This fund is used to account for 6% of the 10% utility users tax which is used for sewer maintenance/construction, foot patrol and code enforcement. Air Quality Improvement Fund - This fund was created to account for funds distributed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The revenues are restricted to programs which promote reduction in air pollution from motor vehicles. Asset Forfeiture Fund - This fund is used to account for property seized as a result of illegal activity and forfeited to the Police Department. Funds must be used for law enforcement purposes to supplement, not replace or decrease, existing appropriations. Budgeted amounts are currently funding narcotics enforcement activities. 41 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS, Continued Fire Protection Fund - This fund is used to account for fire flow fees which are used to upgrade and enhance the fire flow capabilities of the fire protection system. Grant Fund - This fund is used to account for State and federal grants for specific projects. Crossing Guard Fund - This fund is used to account for the funds of the assessment district, which was created pursuant to Government Code 55530-70 for provision of crossing guards. Sewer Fund - This fund is used to account for funds derived from a portion of the 6o utility user tax and miscellaneous services charges. Funds are spent on the Sewer/Storm Drain and capital sewer projects. 42 Assets: Cash, cash equivalents and investments Cash held by trustee Reimbursable grants receivable Interest receivable on investments Other receivables Due from other funds Total assets Liabilities: Accounts payable Due to other funds Accrued liabilities Accrued wages Deferred revenue Total liabilities Fund balances: Reserved: Bike path Strand walkway Unreserved: Designated: Sewer contingencies Undesignated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances Continued CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1994 39,691 92,127 1,313,684 316,979 Utility 195,689 2,258,584 515,149 Parks And User Tax Air Lighting State County Recreation Railroad Utility Quality District Gas Tax Gas Tax Facilities Right/way User Tax Improvement $1,311,381 $462,495 $8,990 $197,438 $2,258,404 $509,190 $30,882 549,377 15,702 5,541 106 2,365 1,816 6,100 369 20,896 6,769 17,600 $1 347979 $474,805 $9,098 $217,403 $2 80� 9,597 $515,290 $31,251 $15,893 $26,008 $3 $21,714 $1,636 $141 549,377 2,116 16,286 _ 34,295 26,008 3 21,714 551,013 141 - 39,691 92,127 1,313,684 316,979 9,095 195,689 2,258,584 515,149 $31,251 1,313,684 448,797 91095 195,689 2,258,584 515,149 31,251 $1,347,979 $474,805 $9,098 $217,403 $2 80� $515.290 $31,251 43 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET, Continued June 30, 1994 44 rr r� M MW M mom MM MM Crossing Asset Guard Seizure & Fire Total Grants District Sewer Forfeiture Protection 1994 1993 Assets: Cash, cash equivalents and investments $154,289 $34,351 $3,664,235 $483,639 $444,268 $9,559,562 $10,048,870 Cash held by trustee 549,377 521,739 Reimbursable grants receivable 17,600 17,600 29,035 Interest receivable on investments 412 43,886 5,794 5,322 87,415 90,382 Other receivables 4,242 1,880 33,787 71,166 Due from other funds 17,600 17,600 Total assets $171.889 $39,005 $3,710.001 $489,433 $449,590 $10265,341 $10,778.792 Liabilities: Accounts payable $80 $45,719 $7,892 $129 $119,215 $448,238 Due to other funds $17,600 17,600 17,600 Accrued liabilities 549,377 521,739 Accrued wages 267 2,269 12,097 16,749 84,631 Deferred revenue 2,859 19,145 16,648 Total liabilities 17,600 3,206 47,988 19,989 129 722,086 1,088,856 Fund balances: Reserved: Bike path 39,691 44,890 Strand walkway 92,127 571,768 Unreserved: Designated: Sewer contingencies 100,000 100,000 100,000 Undesignated 154,289 35,799 3,562,013 469,444 449,461 9,311,437 8,973,278 Total fund balances 154,289 35,799 3,662,013 469,444 449,461 9,543,255 9,689,936 Total liabilities and fund balances $171,889 $39,005 $3,710,001 $489.433 $449,590 $10.265,341 $10,778,792 44 rr r� M MW M mom MM MM M M M M M M M Mao Mao" M M W r M= M Revenues: Property taxes Other taxes Fines and forfeitures Intergovernmental Charges for services Miscellaneous Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public safety Community development Public works Debt service: Principal Interest Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures and other financing sources (uses) Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 45 Utility Parks And User Tax Air Lighting State County Recreation Railroad Utility Quality District Gas Tax Gas Tax Facilities Right/Way User Tax Improvement $170,064 29,009 $969,085 $1,453,626 $336,159 $20,334 66,632 31,141 $441 $12,018 53,007 22,443 1,219 265,705 367,300 441 12,018 1,022,092 1,476,069 21,553 325,132 530,283 10 148,424 2,719 501 4,173 328,560 _ 272,192 _ 325,132 530,283 10 148,424 603,471 501 4,173 (59,427) (162,983) 431 (136,406) 418,621 1,475,568 17,380 658 (10,489) (434,391) (1,336,779) (9,831) (434,391) - - (1,336,779) - (69,258) (597,374) 431 (136,406) 418,621 138,789 17,380 1,382,942 1,046,171 8,664 332,095 1,839,963 376,360 13,871 $1 31 $448,797 $9,095 $195,689 $2,258,584 $515,149 $31,251 45 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 46 r= M W no am an M 1W r W- We M M M M M 1W Crossing Asset Guard Seizure & Fire Total Grant District Sewer Forfeiture Protection 1994 1993 Revenues: - Property taxes $50,015 $220,079 $224,680 Other taxes 4,469 2,456,189 2,348,927 Fines and forfeitures $96,852 96,852 258,816 Intergovernmental $28,561 $9,560 394,614 375,100 Charges for services 1,082 1,082 4,727 Miscellaneous 126 $12,255 12,381 102,638 Interest earned on investments 2,360 170,731 31,119 24,059 415,170 503,307 Total revenues 28,561 56,844 181,373 128,097 36,314 3,596,367 3,818,195 Expenditures: Current: Public safety 80,303 641,358 78,183 799,844 657,689 Community development 28,561 28,561 48,512 Public works 228,917 1,240,159 1,244,072 Debt service: Principal 36,212 364,772 335,562 Interest 2,593 274,785 295,527 Total expenditures 28,561 80,303 228,917 680,163 78,183 2,708,121 2,581,362 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures - (23,459) (47,544) (552,066) (41,869) 888,246 1,236,833 Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in 800,875 801,533 803,520 Operating transfers out (1,018) (14,011) (39,772) (1,836,460) (1,715,160) Total other financing sources (uses) - (1,018) 800,875 (14,011) (39,772) (1,034,927) (911,640) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures and other financing sources (uses) - (24,477) 753,331 (566,077) (81,641) (146,681) 325,193 Fund balances - beginning of year 154,289 60,276 2,908,682 1,035,521 531,102 9,689,936 9,364,743 Fund balances - end of year $154,289 $35,799 $3,662,013 $469,444 $449,461 $9.543,255 $689,936 46 r= M W no am an M 1W r W- We M M M M M 1W M= M M M M r us Mae r M" M M r M 'r M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Property taxes Other taxes Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public works Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Total other financing uses Deficiency of revenues under expenditures and other financing uses Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued 47 348,747 Lighting District 23,615 348,747 Variance 23,615 Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $183,000 $170,064 ($12,936) 3,300 29,009 25,709 65,333 66,632 1,299 251,633 265,705 14,072 348,747 325,132 23,615 348,747 325,132 23,615 (97,114) (59,427) 37,687 658 658 (10,489) (10,489) (9,831) (9,831) - (106,945) (69,258) 37,687 1,382,942 1,382,942 $1,275,997 $1,313,684 $37,687 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Continued 48 M r M� M M M" M M,= man Mao MM State Gas Tax Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Revenues: Intergovernmental $321,471 $336,159 $14,688 Interest earned on investments 34,540 31,141 (3,399) Total revenues 356,011 367,300 11,289 Expenditures: Current: Public works 922,915 530,283 392,632 Total expenditures 922,915 530,283 392,632 Deficiency of revenues under expenditures (566,904) (162,983) 403,921 Other financing uses: Operating transfers out (434,391) (434,391) Total other financing uses (434,391) (434,391) - Deficiency of revenues under expenditures and other financing uses (1,001,295) (597,374) 403,921 Fund balances - beginning of year 1,046,171 1,046,171 Fund balance - end of year $44,876 $448,797 $403,921 Continued 48 M r M� M M M" M M,= man Mao MM M M M M r M r � M M = M r W r r M r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public works Total expenditures Excess of revenues over expenditures Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued 49 County Gas Tax Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $29,143 $441 ($28,702) 29,143 441 (28,702) 10,000 10 9,990 10,000 10 9,990 19,143 431 (18,712) 8,664 8,664 $27,807 $9,095 ($18,712} CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public works Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued 50 Parks And Recreation Facilities Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $13,112 $12,018 ($1,094) 13,112 12,018 (1,094) 344,896 148,424 196,472 344,896 148,424 196,472 (331,784) (136,406) 195,378 332,095 332,095 $311 $195,689 $195,378 M= r== M M w= M M= M r W= A M M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Other taxes Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public works Debt service: Principal Interest Total expenditures Excess of revenues over expenditures Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued 51 Utility -User Tax Railroad Riaht-Of-Wa 2,200 2,719 Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $955,418 $969,085 $13,667 52,698 53,007 309 1,008,116 1,022,092 13,976 2,200 2,719 (519) 617,193 328,560 288,633 272,192 (272,192) 619,393 603,471 15,922 386,723 418,621 29,898 1,839,963 1,839,963 $2 22y 8,686 $2,258,584 $29,898 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Other taxes Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public works Total expenditures Excess of revenue over expenditures Other financing uses: Operating transfers out Total other financing uses Excess of revenues over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued Utilitv User Tax 52 �r �r rr � � r � r �w r � +�■� r � � r� �r .r ri 501 Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $1,433,127 $1,453,626 $20,499 19,885 22,443 2,558 1,453,012 1,476,069 23,057 52 �r �r rr � � r � r �w r � +�■� r � � r� �r .r ri 501 (501) - 501 501) 1,453,012 1,475,568 22,556 (1,336,779) (1,336,779) (1,336,779) (1,336,779) - 116,233 138,789 22,556 376,360 376,360 $492,593 $515,149 $22,556 52 �r �r rr � � r � r �w r � +�■� r � � r� �r .r ri CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June -30, 1994 Revenues: Intergovernmental Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public works Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances (deficit) - end of year Continued 53 Air Ouality Improvement Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $18,800 $20,334 $1,534 11095 1,219 124 19,895 21,553 1,658 35,539 4,173 31,366 35,539 4,173 31,366 (15,644) 17,380 33,024 13,871 13,871 ($1,773) $31,251 $33,024 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Intergovernmental Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Community development Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued 54 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $17,600 $28,561 $10,961 17,600 28,561 10,961 37,465 28,561 8,904 37,465 28,561 8,904 (19,865) - 19,865 154,289 154,289 $134,424 $154,289 $19,865 M r r= M M w r M M M M M M M M M M M w r M M= r= M= M r= M= M r M= CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Property taxes Other taxes Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public safety Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Other financing uses: Operating transfers out Total other financing uses Deficiency of revenues under expenditures and other financing uses Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued 55 Crossing Guard District Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $54,843 $50,015 ($4,828) 1,500 4,469 2,969 2,797 2,360 437) 59,140 56,844 (2,296) 81,623 80,303 1,320 81,623 80,303 1,320 (22,483) (23,459) (976) (1,018) (11018) (1,018) 1 018) (23,501) (24,477) (976) 60,276 60,276 _ $36,775 $35,799 ($976) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Intergovernmental Charges for current services Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public works Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Other financing sources: Operating transfers in Total other financing sources Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures and other financing sources (uses) Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued 56 2,686,593 Sewer 228,917 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $8,000 $9,560 $1,560 1,971 1,082 (889) 158,162 170,731 12,569 168,133 181,373 13,240 2,686,593 228,917 2,457,676 2,686,593 228,917 2,457,676 (2,518,460) (47,544) 2,470,916 800,875 800,875 800,875 800,875 - (1,717,585) 753,331 2,470,916 2,908,682 2,908,682 $1,191,097 $3,662,013 $2,470,916 M r r i M= M M M T=== M== M= M = M = = M = i = M = = = = M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Fines and forfeitures Miscellaneous Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public safety Debt service: Principal Interest Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Other financing uses: Operating transfers out Total other financing uses Deficiency of revenues under expenditures and other financing uses Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued 57 Asset Seizure And Forfeiture Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $75,000 $96,852 $21,852 126 126 29,623 31,119 1,496 104,623 128,097 23,474 818,933 38,805 857,738 (753,115) (14,011) (14,011) (767,126) 1,035,521 $268,395 641,358 36,212 2,593 680,163 (552,066) (14,011) (14,011) (566,077) 1,035,521 $469.444 177,575 2,593 (2,593) 177,575 201,049 201,049 $201,049 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Revenues: Miscellaneous Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Public safety Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Other financing uses: Operating transfers out Total other financing uses Deficiency of revenues under expenditures and other financing uses Fund balances - beginning of year Fund balances - end of year Continued 58 100,000 Fire Protection 21,817 Variance 78,183 Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $12,000 $12,255 $255 25,246 24,059 (1,187) 37,246 36,314 (932) 100,000 78,183 21,817 100,000 78,183 21,817 (62,754) (41,869) 20,885 (39,772) (39,772) (39,772) (39,772) - (102,526) (81,641) 20,885 531,102 531,102 $428,576 $449,461 $20,885 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 59 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Revenues: Property taxes $237,843 $220,079 ($17,764) Other taxes 2,393,345 2,456,189 62,844 Fines and forfeitures 75,000 96,852 21,852 Intergovernmental 365,871 394,614 28,743 Charges for current services 1,971 1,082 (889) Miscellaneous 12,000 12,381 381 Interest earned on investments 431,634 415,170 (16,464) Total revenues 3,517,664 3,596,367 78,703 Expenditures: Current: Public safety 1,000,556 799,844 200,712 Community development 37,465 28,561 8,904 Public works 4,350,890 1,240,159 3,110,731 Debt service: Principal 655,998 364,772 291,226 Interest 274,785 (274,765) Total expenditures 6,044,909 2,708,121 3,336,788 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (2,527,245) 888,246 3,415,491 Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in 801,533 801,533 Operating transfers out (1,836,460) (1,836,460) Total other financing uses (1,034,927) (1,034,927) - Deficiency of revenues under expenditures and other financing uses (3,562,172) (146,681) 3,415,491 Fund balances - beginning of year 9,689,936 9,689,936 Fund balances - end of year $6,127,764 $9,543,255 $3,415,491 59 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Enterprise Funds are established to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises and where periodic determination of net income is desired. Expenses, including depreciation, of providing goods or services to the general public are recovered primarily through user charges. Enterprise funds of the City of Hermosa Beach include the following: Downtown Enhancement Fund - All parking lot revenues are deposited to the Downtown Enhancement Fund in order to finance parking operations in the downtown area. Parking Fund - All meter, fine and parking permit revenues are deposited to the Parking Fund in order to finance parking operations and capital improvements. Proposition "A" Transit Fund - Transit revenue consists primarily of Proposition A funds (the 1/2 cent sales tax for Los Angeles County transportation purposes). The City currently operates a Dial -a -ride program, a commuter bus, and subsidizes bus passes for senior citizens and students. Proposition "C" Transit Fund - The Proposition C Fund is a new fund which was added during fiscal year 1992 to account for funds allocated from the voter -approved 1/2 cent sales. Funds must be used for transit purposes. M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1994 61 Downtown Proposition "A" Proposition "C" Totals Enhancement Parking Transit Transit 1994 1993 Assets: Current assets: Cash, cash equivalents and investments $475,941 $242,830 $47,564 $158,569 $924,904 $706,041 Interest receivable on investments 5,715 3,411 570 1,898 11,594 9,338 Other receivables 18,162 16,468 13,282 47,912 46,840 Total current assets 481,656 264,403 64,602 173,749 984,410 762,219 Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation 616,530 1,370,523 1,987,053 1,933,791 Total assets $1,098.186 $1,634.926 $64.602$173,749 $2,971,463 $2,696,010 Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable $44,947 $157,658 $10,899 $21,244 $234,748 $92,450 Accrued wages 739 29,248 10 29,997 78,601 Total liabilities 45,686 186,906 10,899 21,254 264,745 171,051 Fund equity: Contributed capital 34,844 34,844 22,250 Retained earnings: Reserved: Capital outlay 9,592 9,592 9,592 Parking facility 5,254 5,254 5,254 VPD land acquisition 105,000 105,000 100,000 Unreserved 947,500 1,398,330 53,703 152,495 2,552,028 2,387,863 Total retained earnings 1,052,500 1,413,176 53,703 152,495 2,671,874 2,502,709 Total fund equity 1,052,500 1,448,020 53,703 152,495 2,706,718 2,524,959 Total liabilities and fund equity $1,098,186 $1.634,926 $64,602 $173,749 $2,971,463 $2,696,010 61 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 62 Downtown Proposition "A" Proposition "C" Totals Enhancement Parking Transit Transit 1994 1993 Operating revenues: Fines and forfeitures $933,637 $933,637 $954,324 Use of money and property $197,325 4,800 202,125 194,074 Charges for services 900,871 $3,630 $10,994 915,495 959,321 Miscellaneous_ 2,825 40 2,865 585 Total operating revenues 197,325 1,842,133 3,670 10,994 2,054,122 2,108,304 Operating expenses: Salaries and wages 11,071 598,476 5,104 23,639 638,290 657,566 Contractor services 123,012 10,420 200,506 167,288 501,226 556,116 Supplies 446 55,989 678 57,113 146,996 Other 810 82,520 607 (607) B3, 330 1,194 Depreciation 1,955 7,433 9,388 9.616 Total operating expenses 137.294 754,838 206.217 190,998 1,289.347 1.371.488 Operating income (lass) 60,031 1,087,295 (202,547) (180,004) 764,775 736,816 Nonoperating revenue: Local assistance 175,523 174,996 350,519 352,008 Interest earned on investments 22.159 9.635 6,377 81050 46.221 35.927 Total nonoperating revenues 22,159 9.635 181.900 183,046 396.740 387.935 Income (loss) before operating transfers 82,190 1,096,930 (20,647) 3,042 1,161,515 1,124,751 Operating transfers in 137 11,787 22 106 12,052 50,194 Operating transfers out (1 1160) (1.003,242) (1,004,402) (1,194,038) Net income (loss) 81,167 105,475 (20,625) 3,148 169,165 (19,093) Retained earnings - beginning of year 971.333 1,307.701 74,328 149,347 2,502,709 2.521.802 Retained earnings - end of year $1,052,500 $1,413,176 $53.703 $152.495 $2,671,874 $2.502.709 62 M M M M M r M M M M M M M M M r M M M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Operating revenues: Fines and forfeitures Use of money and property Charges for services Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and wages Contractor services Supplies Other Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) Nonoperating revenue: Interest earned on investments Total nonoperating revenues Income (loss) before operating transfers Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Net income (loss) Retained earnings - beginning of year Retained earnings - end of year Continued Downtown Enhancement Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $197,325 $197,325 197,325 9,658 227,471 1,200 8,888 2,545 249,762 (52,437) 20,831 20,831 (31,606) 137 (1,160) (32,629) 899,739 $867,110 197,325 11,071 123,012 446 810 1,955 137,294 60,031 22,159 22,159 82,190 137 (1,160) 81,167 971.333 $1,052,500 63 ($1,413) 104,459 754 8,078 590 112,468 112,468 1,328 1,328 113,796 113,796 71,594 $185,390 1,871,030 Parking (28,897) 642,668 598,476 Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $949,930 $933,637 ($16,293) 138,365 4,800 4,800 920,100 900,871 (19,229) 11000 2,825 1,825 1,871,030 1,842,133 (28,897) 642,668 598,476 44,192 17,015 10,420 6,595 62,088 55,989 6,099 138,365 82,520 55,845 14,000 7,433 6,567 874,136 754,838 119,298 996,894 1,087,295 90,401 3,202 9,635 6,433 3,202 9,635 6,433 1,000,096 1,096,930 96,834 11,787 11,787 (1,003,242) (1,003,242) 8,641 105,475 96,834 1,.144,998 1,307,701 162,703 $11153,639 $14413,176 $259,537 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Operating revenues: Charges for services Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and wages Contractor services Supplies Other Total operating expenses Operating loss Nonoperating revenue: Local assistance Interest earned on investments Total nonoperating revenues Income (loss) before operating transfers Operating transfers in Net income (loss) Retained earnings - beginning of year Retained earnings - end of year Continued Proposition "A" Transit Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $5,000 $3,630 ($1,370) 40 40 5,000 3,670 (1,330) 5,230 209,400 214,630 (209,630) 165,885 6,619 172,504 (37,126) 22 (37,104) 74,328 $37,224 r = M 5,104 200,506 607 206,217 (202,547) 175,523 6,377 181,900 (20,647) 22 (20,625) 74,328 $53,703 64 126 8,894 607) 8,413 7,083 9,638 242) 9,396 16,479 16,479 $16,479 Proposition "C" Transit Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $13,800 $10,994 ($2,806) 13,800 10,994 (2,806) 25,151 23,639 1,512 270,800 167,288 103,512 650 678 (28) 607) 607 296,601 190,998 105,603 (282,801) (180,004) 102,797 163,184 174,996 11,812 7,573 8,050 477 170,757 183,046 12,289 (112,044) 3,042 115,086 106 106 (111,938) 3,148 115,086 149,347 149,347 $37,409 $152,495 $115,086 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS, Continued For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 65 Totals Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Operating revenues: Fines and forfeitures $949,930 $933,637 ($16,293) Use of money and property 197,325 202,125 4,800 Charges for services 938,900 915,495 (23,405) Miscellaneous 11000 2,865 1,865 Total operating revenues 2,087,155 2,054,122 (33,033) Operating expenses: Salaries and wages 682,707 638,290 44,417 Contractor services 724,686 501,226 223,460 Supplies 63,938 57,113 6,825 Other 147,253 83,330 63,923 Depreciation 16.545 9,388 7.157 Total operating expenses 1,635,129 1,289,347 345,782 Operating income 452,026 764,775 312,749 Nonoperating revenue: Local assistance 329,069 350,519 21,450 Interest earned on investments 38,225 46,221 7,996 Total nonoperating revenues 367,294 396,740 29,446 Income before operating transfers 819,320 1,161,515 342,195 Operating transfers in 12,052 12,052 Operating transfers out (1,004,402) (1.004.402) Net income (loss) (173,030) 169,165 342,195 Retained earnings - beginning of year 2,502,709 2,502,709 Retained earnings - end of year $2,329,679 $2.671,874 $342,195 65 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Non-cash capital and related financing activities in the Parking Fund include a transfer in of fixed assets with a cost of $37,888 and a net book value of $12,594. 66 Downtown Proposition "A" Proposition "C" Totals Enhancement Parkins Transit Transit 1994 1993 Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income (loss) $60,031 $1,087,295 ($202,547) ($180,004) $764,775 $736,816 Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation 1,955 7,433 9,388 9,616 Changes in assets and liabilities: Interest receivable on investments (1,941) (209) 74 (180) (2,256) (1,428) Other receivables (2,666) 233 1,361 (1,072) 147,102 Accounts payable Accrued 44,208 93,981 8,732 (4,623) 142,298 7,378 wages (2,918) (43,341) 318) (2,027) (48,604) 739) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 101,335 1,142,493 (193,826) (185,473) 864,529 898,745 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Local assistance received 175,523 174,996 350,519 352,008 Operating transfers in 137 11,787 22 106 12,052 50,194 Operating transfers out (11160) (1,003,242) (1,004,402) (1,194,038) Net cash provided by (used in) noncapital financial activities (1,023) (991,455) 175,545 175,102 (641,831) (791,836) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Acquisition of fixed assets (50,056) (50,056) (3,351) Net cash used in capital and related financing activities (50,056) (50,056) (3,351) Cash flows from investing activities: Interest and dividends on investments 22,159 9,635 6,377 8,050 46,221 35,927 Net cash provided by investing activities 22,159 9,635 6,377 8,050 46,221 35,927 Net increase (decrease) in cash 122,471 110,617 (11,904) (2,321) 218,863 139,485 Cash, cash equivalents and investments - beginning of year 353,470 132,213 59,468 160.890 706,041 566,556 Cash, cash equivalents and investments - end of year $475,941 $242,830 $47,564 $158,569 $924,904 $706,041 Non-cash capital and related financing activities in the Parking Fund include a transfer in of fixed assets with a cost of $37,888 and a net book value of $12,594. 66 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS June 30, 1994 And 1993 Assets: Current assets: Cash, cash equivalents and investments Interest receivable on investments Total current assets Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation Total assets Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued wages Total liabilities Retained earnings: Reserved: VPD land acquisition Unreserved Total retained earnings Total liabilities and retained earnings 67 1994 1993 $475,941 $353,470 5,715 3,774 481,656 357,244 616,530 618,485 $1,098,186 $975,729 $44,947 $739 739 3,657 45,686 4,396 105,000 100,000 947,500 871,333 1,052,500 971,333 $1,098,186 $975,729 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Operating revenues: Use of money and property Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and wages Contractor services Supplies Other Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenues: Interest earned on investments Total nonoperating revenues Income before operating transfers Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Net income Retained earnings - beginning of year Retained earnings - end of year AN 1994 1993 $197,325 $189,274 197,325 189,274 11,071 17,047 123,012 47,547 446 4,307 810 1,955 1,955 137,294 70,856 60,031 118,418 22,159 16,882 22,159 16,882 82,190 135,300 137 (1,160.) (11,526) 81,167 123,774 971,333 847,559 $1,052,500 $971,333 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For The Years Ended June 30, 1994 And 1993 Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation Changes in assets and liabilities: Interest receivable on investments Accounts payable Accrued wages Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Net cash used in noncapital financing activities Cash flows from investing activities: Interest and dividends on investments Net cash provided by investing activities Net increase in cash Cash, cash equivalents and investments - beginning of year Cash, cash equivalents and investments - end of year 1994 1993 $60,031 $118,418 1,955 1,955 (1,941) (113) 44,208 (3,579) (2,918) (184) 101,335 116,497 137 (1,160) (11,526) (1,023) (11,526) 22,159 22,159 122,471 16,882 16,882 121,853 353,470 231,617 $475,941 $353,470 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS June 30, 1994 And 1993 Assets: Current assets: Cash, cash equivalents and investments Interest receivable on investments Other receivables Total current assets Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation Total assets Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued wages Total liabilities Fund equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings: Reserved: Capital outlay Parking facility Unreserved Total retained earnings Total fund equity Total liabilities and fund equity 70 1994 $242,830 3,411 18,162 264,403 1993 $132,213 3,202 15,496 150,911 1,370,523 1,315,306 $1,634,926 $1,466,217 $157,658 $63,677 29,248 72,589 186,906 136,266 34,844 22,250 9,592 9,592 5,254 5,254 1,398,330 1,292,855 1,413,176 1,307,701 1,448,020 1,329,951 $1,634,926 $1,466,217 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PARKING ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS For The Years Ended June 30, 1994 And 1993 Operating revenues: Fines and forfeitures Use of money and property Charges for services Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and wages Contractor services Supplies Other Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenues: Interest earned on investments Total nonoperating revenues Income before operating transfers Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Net income (loss) Retained earnings - beginning of year Retained earnings - end of year 71 i &�W. $933,637 4,800 900,871 2,825 1,842,133 598,476 10,420 55,989 82,520 7,433 754,838 1,087,295 9,635 9,635 1,096,930 11,787 (1,003,242) 105,475 1,307,701 $1,413,176 1993 $954,324 4,800 941,603 585 1,901,312 613,289 16,747 142,306 1,194 7,661 781,197 1,120,115 7,691 7.691 1,127,806 50,194 (1,182,512) (4,512) 1,312,213 $1,307,701 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For The Years Ended June 30, 1994 And 1993 72 1994 1993 Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income $1,087,295 $1,120,115 Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 7,433 7,661 Changes in assets and liabilities: Interest receivable on investments (209) (2,311) Other receivables (2,666) 7,610 Accounts payable 93,981 8,300 Accrued wages (43,341) 21 Net cash provided by operating activities 1,142,493 1,141,396 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Operating transfers in 11,787 50,194 Operating transfers out (1,003,242) (1,182,512) Net cash used in noncapital financing activities (991,455) (1,132,318) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Acquisition of fixed assets (50,056) (3,351) Net cash used in capital and related financing activities (50,056) (3,351) Cash flows from investing activities: Interest and dividends on investments 9,635 7,691 Net cash provided by investing activities 9,635 7,691 Net increase in cash 110,617 13,418 Cash, cash equivalents and investments - beginning of year 132,213 118,795 Cash, cash equivalents and investments - end of year $242,830 $132,213 Non-cash capital and related financing activities include a transfer in of fixed assets with a cost of $37,888 and a net book value of $12,594. 72 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION "A" TRANSIT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS June 30, 1994 And 1993 Assets: Current assets: Cash, cash equivalents and investments Interest receivable on investments Other receivables Total assets Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued wages Total liabilities Retained earnings: Unreserved Total retained earnings Total liabilities and retained earnings 73 1994 1993 $47,564 $59,468 570 644 16,468 16,701 $64,602 $76,813 $10,899 $2,167 318 10,899 2,485 53,703 74,328 53,703 74,328 $64,602 $76,813 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPOSITION "A" TRANSIT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS For The Years Ended June 30, 1994 And 1993 Operating revenues: Charges for services Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and wages Contractor services Other Total operating expenses Operating loss Nonoperating revenues: Local assistance revenues Interest on investments Total nonoperating revenues Loss before operating transfers Operating transfers in Net loss Retained earnings - beginning of year Retained earnings - end of year 74 1994 1993 $3,630 $4,951 40 3,670 4,951 5,104 5,398 200,506 316,570 607 206,217 321,968 (202,547) (317,017) 175,523 183,547 6,377 1,769 181,900 185,316 (20, 647) (131, 701) 22 (20,625) (131,701) 74,328 206,029 $53,703 $74,328 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPOSITION "A" TRANSIT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For The Years Ended June 30, 1994 And 1993 Cash flows from operating activities: Operating loss Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities: Changes in assets and liabilities: Interest receivable on investments Other receivables Accounts payable Accrued wages Net cash used in operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Local assistance received Operating transfers in Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities Cash flows from investing activities: Interest dividends on investments Net cash provided by investing activities Net decrease in cash Cash, cash equivalents and investments - beginning of year Cash, cash equivalents and investments - end of year 75 1994 1993 ($202,547) ($317,017) 74 2,714 233 (1,866) 8,732 (23,210) (318) (2,613) (193,826) (341,992) 175,523 183,547 22 175,545 183,547 6,377 1,769 6,377 1,769 (11,904) (156,676) 59,468 216,144 $47,564 $59,468 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION "C" TRANSIT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS June 30, 1994 Assets: Current assets: Cash and investments Interest receivable on investments Other receivables Total assets Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued wages Total current liabilities Retained earnings: Unreserved Total retained earnings Total liabilities and retained earnings 76 1994 1993 $158,569 $160,890 1,898 1,718 13,282 14,643 $173,749 $177,251 $21,244 $25,867 10 2,037 21,254 27,904 152,495 149,347 152,495 149,347 $173,749 $177,251 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPOSITION "C" TRANSIT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS For The Years Ended June 30, 1994 And 1993 Operating revenues: Charges for services Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and wages Contractor services Supplies Other Total operating expenses Operating loss Nonoperating revenues: Local assistance revenues Interest earned on investments Total nonoperating revenues Income (loss) before operating transfers Operating transfers in Net income (loss) Retained earnings - beginning of year Retained earnings - end of year 77 1994 1993 $10,994 $12,767 10,994 12,767 23,639 21,832 167,288 175,252 678 383 (607) 156,001 190,998 197,467 (180,004) (184,700) 174,996 168,461 8,050 9,585 183,046 178,046 3,042 (6,654) 106 3,148 (6,654) 149,347 156,001 $152,495 $149,347 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPOSITION "C" TRANSIT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For The Years Ended June 30, 1994 And 1993 Cash flows from operating activities: Operating loss Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash used in operating activities: Changes in assets and liabilities: Interest receivable on investments Other receivables Accounts payable Accrued wages Net cash used in operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Local assistance revenues Operating transfers in Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities Cash flows from investing activities: Interest and dividends on investments Net cash provided by investing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash Cash, cash equivalents and investments - beginning of year Cash, cash equivalents and investments - end of year 78 1994 1993 ($180,004) ($184,700) (180) (1,718) 1,361 141,358 (4,623) 25,867 (2,027) 2,037 (185,473) (17,156) 174,996 168,461 106 175,102 168,461 8,050 9,585 8,050 9,585 (2,321) 160,890 160,890 $158,569 $160,890 1 i 1� J INTERNAL SERVICE FUND Insurance Fund - The Insurance Fund was created to account for costs associated with the City's insurances: liability, workers' compensation, unemployment, auto, property and officials' bonds. 79 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS June 30, 1994 And 1993 Assets: Current assets: Cash, cash equivalents and investments Interest receivable on investments Deposits Prepaid expenses Total assets Liabilities: Current liabilities: Workers' compensation claims payable Accounts payable Accrued wages General liability claims payable Total current liabilities Long-term liabilities: Workers' compensation claims payable General liability claims payable Total long-term liabilities Total liabilities Fund equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings, unreserved Total fund equity Total liabilities and fund equity MR 1994 1993 $867,405 $919,012 354 1,601,496 1,282,140 2,293 11998 $2,471,548 $2,203,150 $300,000 $300,000 45,679 41,079 7,791 13,237 100,000 100,000 453,470 454,316 721,704 501,982 577,295 454,810 1,298,999 956,792 1,752,469 1,411,108 474,165 559,165 244,914 232,877 719,079 792,042 $2,471,548 $2,203,150 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INSURANCE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS For The Years Ended June 30, 1994 And 1993 Operating revenues: Charges for services Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and wages Contractor services Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenues: Interest earned on investments Total nonoperating revenues Income before operating transfers Operating transfers in Net income Retained earnings (deficit) - beginning of year Retained earnings - end of year 81 1994 1993 $1,026,540 $1,033,519 38,234 12,773 1,064,774 1,046,292 619,970 488,491 434,039 224,990 1,054,009 713,481 10,765 332,811 537 498 537 498 11,302 333,309 735 12,037 333,309 232,877 (100,432) $244,914 $232,877 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET AND ACTUAL INSURANCE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 82 M M go r (M rs M�am, M M M M M M OW .i = ■r Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Operating revenues: Charges for services $1,026,535 $1,026,540 $5 Miscellaneous 38,234 38,234 Total operating revenues 1,026,535 1,064,774 38,239 Operating expenses: Salaries and wages 399,740 619,970 (220,230) Contractor services 557,237 434,039 123,198 Total operating expenses 956,977 1_,054,009 (97,032) Operating income 69,558 10,765 (58,793) Nonoperating revenues: Interest earned on investments 78 537 459 Total nonoperating revenues 78 537 459 Income before operating transfers 69,636 11,302 (58,334) Operating transfers in 735 735 Net income 70,371 12,037 (58,334) Retained earnings - beginning of year 232,877 232,877 Retained earnings - end of year $303,248 $244,914 ($58,334) 82 M M go r (M rs M�am, M M M M M M OW .i = ■r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INSURANCE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For The Years Ended June 30, 1994 And 1993 83 1994 1993 Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income $10,765 $332,811 Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Changes in assets and liabilities: Interest receivable on investments (354) 821 Deposits (319,356) (227,048) Prepaid expenses (295) (877) Accrual for workers' compensation claims payable 219,722 74,585 Accounts payable 4,600 (39,546) Accrued wages (5,446) 585 General liability claims payable 122,485 (199,416) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 32,121 (58,085) Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Operating transfers in 735 - Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities 735 - Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Residual equity transfer in 400,000 Residual equity transfer out (85,000) Net cash provided by (used in) capital and related financing activities (85,000) 400,000 Cash flows from investing activities: Interest and dividends on investments 537 498 Net cash provided by investing activities 537 498 Net increase (decrease) in cash (51,607) 342,413 Cash, cash equivalents and investments - beginning of year 919,012 576,599 Cash, cash equivalents and investments - end of year $867,405 $919,012 83 AGENCY FUND The Agency Fund is used to account for assets held by the City in the capacity of agent for individuals. Agency Fund spending is controlled primarily through legal agreements and applicable State and Federal laws. The Agency Fund of the City was established for the two deferred compensation plans offered to employees. r fl 7 1 it 84 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AGENCY FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEETS June 30, 1994 And 1993 1994 1993 Assets: Deferred compensation plan investments $1,242,776 $1,036,381 Liabilities: Deferred compensation plan liability 85 $1,242,776 $1,036,381 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AGENCY FUND STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Assets: Deferred compensation plan investments Liabilities: Deferred compensation plan liability Balance July 1, 1993 $1 03� 6,381 86 Balance Additions Deletions June 30, 1994 $235,720 ($29,325) $1,242,776 $235,720 ($29.325) $1,242,776 M it V -W m r r MM mom M ,M r sft + m� M= 1 111 1 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP The General Fixed Assets Account Group is comprised of those fixed assets of a government jurisdiction which are not accounted for in a Proprietary Fund. 11 L� Li 1 87 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY SOURCE June 30, 1994 And 1993 General fixed assets: Land Buildings Improvements other than buildings Machinery and equipment Vehicles Construction in progress Total general fixed assets Investment in general fixed assets by source: General Fund Special Revenue Funds Donations Total investment in general fixed assets 29 1994 $15,943,218 700,656 1,319,365 962,262 550,805 $19,476,306 $12,783,973 6,690,120 2,213 $19,476,306 1993 $15,943,218 741,111 978,994 885,408 626,788 25,228 $19,200,747 $10,223,295 8,974,524 2,928 $19,200,747 Im= m m m� m m m" m m r M W W M r M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS - BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY June 30, 1994 Function And Activit General government: City Council City Clerk City Treasurer City Manager Personnel Finance and administration Other Total general government Public safety: Police Fire Animal control Civil defense Total public safety Streets and highways: Maintenance Traffic safety Total streets and highways Community development Culture and recreation Public works Sanitation Total general fixed assets 89 Buildings Structures Machinery And Other And Land Improvements Equipment Vehicles Total $33,536 $33,536 1,273 1,273 689 689 3,047 3,047 6,829 6,829 179,390 179,390 $60,000 $238,579 298,579 60,000 238,579 224,764 523,343 534,219 509,806 $258,836 1,302,861 4,800 50,019 160,469 215,288 2,117 614 447 3,178 8,989 81989 541,136 569,428 419,752 1,530,316 5,210 51,809 57,019 1,624 1,624 6,834 51,809 58,643 8,229 7,844 16,073 650,000 505,598 39,229 1,144 1,195,971 15,233,218 734,706 97,395 10,429 16,075,748 16,435 59,777 76,212 $15,943,218 $2,020,019 $962,314 $550,755 $19.476,306 89 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS - BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY For The Year Ended June 30, 1994 Function And Activit General government: City Council City Clerk City Treasurer City Manager Personnel Finance and administration Other Total general government Public safety: Police Fire Animal control Civil defense Total public safety Streets and highways Maintenance Traffic safety Total streets and highways _ Community development Culture and recreation Public works Sanitation Total general fixed assets 90 Deductions General Fixed Disposals General Fixed Assets Transfers And Assets June 30, 1993 Additions Depreciation Adjustments June 30, 1994 $12,795 $23,517 $2,776 $33,536 1,776 503 1,273 771 82 689 3,364 317 3,047 8,317 1,488 6,829 81,089 122,523 24,222 179,390 282.778 10,444 ($26,245) 298,579 390,890 146,040 39,832 (26,245) 523,343 987,338 440,710 164,292 (39,105) 1,302,861 234,301 7,646 31,459 (4,800) 215,288 18,589 2,860 12,551 3,178 10,611 455 2,077 81989 1,250,839 448,811 200,688 (31,354) 1,530,316 63,108 137 6,226 57,019 5,006 3,382 1,624 68,114 137 9,608 - 58,643 19,860 430 4,217 16,073 1,212,027 26,561 (10,505) 1,195,971 16,173,351 6,833 62,414 42,022 16,075,748 85,666 98 9,552 76.212 $19.200,747 $602.349 $352,872 ($26,082) $19,476,306 90 GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT ACCOUNT GROUP Capital lease obligations and other forms of general long-term debt are secured by the full faith and credit of the City, and not its individual funds. The amount of such unmatured long-term indebtedness is accounted for in this separate self -balancing account group. 91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE OF GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT As Of June 30, 1994 92 rr r air rr r� rr r rr �r +r �r rr rr .r � �• rr ■r r� Special General Revenue Fund Funds Total Amount available and to be provided for payment of general long-term debt: Amount provided $804,580 $3 813217 $4,617,797 General long-term debt payable: Accrued vacation and sick leave $780,185 $51,333 $831,518 Capital lease obligations: Original cost 1,046,564 1,128,246 2,174,810 Retired 1,022,169 1,106,362 2,128,531 Outstanding 24,395 21,884 46,279 Certificates of participation: Original cost 5,000,000 5,000,000 Retired 1,260,000 1,260,000 3,740,000 3,740,000 Total $804,580 $3,813,217 $4,617,797 92 rr r air rr r� rr r rr �r +r �r rr rr .r � �• rr ■r r� Pi 1 1� 1 i 1 cn I STATISTICAL SECTION I' u 1 1 it 1 Fiscal Year 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Property And Other Taxes $3,835,610 4,796,911 5,695,518 6,255,374 5,364,338 (a) 5,883,863 6,143,200 6,499,648 6,177,473 5,918,661 Licenses And Permits $545,546 305,714 421,167 245,318 296,808 290,080 272,944 212,552 170,913 124,078 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE June 30, 1994 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Fine And Forfeitures $242,100 194,970 155,355 113,001 152,503 170,056 235,604 116,221 89,454 82,504 Interest Earned On Investments And Use Of Money And Property $153,662 317,960 396,295 344,399 449,822 508,047 493,645 598,248 566,017 488,809 Inter- governmental $181,247 752,928 760,673 801,348 866,705 861,688 844,380 755,049 747,175 850,423 Charges For Services $268,011 370,917 370,786 343,258 384,459 371,940 460,617 466,897 461,567 388,777 (a) Decrease in revenues due to the transfer of Utility User's Tax from the General Fund to special Revenue Funds. 94 Other $96,908 13,600 55,958 43,260 612,511 1,095,516 100,071 48,192 890,893 31,648 Total $5,323,084 6,753,000 7,855,952 8,145,958 8,147,146 9,181,190 8,550,461 8,696,807 9,103,492 7,884,900 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION June 30, 1994 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) (a) Difference between 1988-89 and previous years is due to the fact that two departments previously included in the State Gas Tax Fund were changed to the General Fund. 95 r== r M r M M M M� i= M W r M= M Culture General Public Community And Debt Capital Fiscal Year Government Safety Development Recreation Public Works Service Outlay Total 1984-85 $2,740,162 $3,596,824 $108,102 $295,171 $558,773 $7,299,032 1985-86 2,562,746 3,481,556 321,701 369,802 708,618 7,444,425 1986-87 2,327,537 3,566,172 357,954 390,314 871,457 7,513,434 1987-88 2,580,491 3,508,521 395,680 469,179 743,995 $3,700 $387,717 8,089,283 1988-89 2,533,553 3,727,294 451,296 567,715 1,076,830 (a) 287,948 318,267 8,962,903 1989-90 2,479,185 4,376,722 505,760 685,447 1,260,654 319,296 455,469 10,082,533 1990-91 2,591,973 4,684,990 561,823 662,225 1,350,711 252,056 (15,275) 10,088,503 1991-92 3,127,798 4,983,285 619,210 647,304 1,434,065 220,509 39,064 11,071,235 1992-93 3,042,827 4,835,261 547,702 659,848 1,303,805 73,808 109,852 10,573,103 1993-94 3,127,429 4,797,606 470,072 712,807 1,132,494 68,133 - 10,308,541 (a) Difference between 1988-89 and previous years is due to the fact that two departments previously included in the State Gas Tax Fund were changed to the General Fund. 95 r== r M r M M M M� i= M W r M= M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSED AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY June 30, 1994 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Source: County of Los Angeles Auditor -Controller. (a) Assessed valuations available from the County of Los Angeles are based on 100% of full value per Section 135 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. . 96 Ratio Of Secured Unsecured Less Net Assessed Estimated Fiscal Year Property Property Exemptions Value Valuation 1984-85 (a) $788,025,239 $11,397,970 $25,861,115 $773,562,094 $799,423,209 1985-86 (a) 847,632,033 10,615,051 26,147,817 832,099,267 858,247,084 1986-87 (a) 915,271,404 14,659,074 26,214,828 903,715,650 929,930,478 1987-88 (a) 1,035,361,083 15,256,377 26,864,210 1,023,733,250 1,050,617,460 1988-89 (a) 1,096,105,305 16,863,718 26,858,358 1,086,110,665 1,112,969,023 1989-90 (a) 1,242,162,411 16,320,177 26,505,493 1,231,977,095 1,258,482,588 1990-91 (a) 1,396,957,667 17,441,110 25,462,161 1,388,936,616 1,414,398,777 1991-92 (a) 1,522,814,681 18,746,473 26,600,457 1,514,960,697 1,541,561,154 1992-93 (a) 1,618,671,580 18,116,386 27,465,403 1,609,322,563 1,636,787,966 1993-94 (a) 1,650,477,510 19,319,218 28,473,523 1,641,323,205 1,669,796,728 Source: County of Los Angeles Auditor -Controller. (a) Assessed valuations available from the County of Los Angeles are based on 100% of full value per Section 135 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. . 96 Ratio Of Net Assets Value To Percentage Estimated Actual Increase Value (%) 14% 96.77 3% 96.95 13% 97.18 13% 97.44 6% 97.59 13% 97.89 12% 98.20 9% 98.27 6% 98.32 2% 98.29 Source: County of Los Angeles Auditor -Controller. (a) Assessed valuations available from the County of Los Angeles are based on 100% of full value per Section 135 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. . 96 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PROPERTY TAX RATES AND TAX LEVIES - ALL OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS (Per $100 of Assessed Valuation) June 30, 1994 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Hospital District .000917 .000658 .000517 Total 1.038682 1.038458 1.033203 1.031436 1.024268 1.021286 1.017590 1.016164 1.013706 1.014825 Source: Los Angeles County Tax Collector. Note: Assessed valuations, available from the County of Los Angeles, are based on 100% of full value per Section 135 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 97 Los Metropolitan Angeles High Flood Water Fiscal Year General County Schools Control District 1984-85 1.000000 .000578 .005720 .015867 .015600 1985-86 1.000000 .000442 .004877 .016081 .016400 1986-87 1.000000 .004288 .013598 .014800 1987-88 1.000000 .005051 .002928 .012257 .011200 1988-89 1.000000 .002781 .010487 .011000 1989-90 1.000000 .002242 .006944 .012100 1990-91 1.000000 .002104 .005786 .009700 1991-92 1.000000 .0018881 .005376 .008900 1992-93 1.000000 .0014090 .003397 .008900 1993-94 1.000000 .001713 .004212 .008900 Hospital District .000917 .000658 .000517 Total 1.038682 1.038458 1.033203 1.031436 1.024268 1.021286 1.017590 1.016164 1.013706 1.014825 Source: Los Angeles County Tax Collector. Note: Assessed valuations, available from the County of Los Angeles, are based on 100% of full value per Section 135 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 97 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS June 30, 1994 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Source: County of Los Angeles Auditor -Controller. m Total Total Percentage Fiscal Current Current Of Levy Year Levy Collection Collected 1984-85 $1,708,603 $1,620,065 94.82 1985-86 1,787,221 1,714,190 95.91 1986-87 1,950,766 1,865,700 95.64 1987-88 2,219,729 2,131,984 96.05 1988-89 2,472,402 2,351,021 95.09 1989-90 2,825,903 2,663,696 94.26 1990-91 3,058,008 3,014,162 98.57 1991-92 3,401,500 3,255,834 95.72 1992-93 3,352,349 3,090,078 92.18 1993-94 3,296,519 3,027,168 91.83 Source: County of Los Angeles Auditor -Controller. m CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMPUTATION OF LEGAL DEBT MARGIN June 30, 1994 (Unaudited) Total assessed value of all real and personal property Legal debt limit - 150 of total assessed valuation (1) Amount of debt applicable to limit (2) Legal debt margin Percentage of legal debt limit authorized $1,669,796,728 250,469,509 250,469,509 0% 0 Source: City of Hermosa Beach - Finance Department. (1) Per California Government Code Section 43605. (2) The City has no debt payable from taxes levied upon property in the City. ' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA STATEMENT OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT June 30, 1994 (Unaudited) Total gross direct and over- lapping bonded debt 18,904,738 (1) Less: Los Angeles County Certificates of Participation (100% self-supporting from leasehold revenues on properties in Marina Del Rey) 490,617 Total net direct and overlapping bonded debt $18,414,121 Ratios To Assessed Valuation: Direct Debt 0.280-. Total Gross Debt 1.15% Total Net Debt 1.12% Share Of Authorized And Unsold Bonds: Metropolitan Water District $102,500 Los Angeles County Flood Control District $70,295 State School Building Aid Repayable As Of June 30, 1994: $0 (1) Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes, revenue, mortgage revenue and tax allocation bonds and nonbonded capital lease obligations. Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc. 100 1989/90 Assessed Valuation: $1,642,373,645 Direct And Overlapping Bonded Debt: % Debt Applicable Outstanding Los Angeles County 0.3640-o $270,707 Los Angeles County Building Authorities 0.364 10,243,847 Los Angeles County Superintendent Of Schools Certificates of Participation 0.364 59,337 ' Los Angeles County Flood Control District 0.381 335,534 Los Angeles County Flood Control District Certificates Of Participation 0.381 895,293 Metropolitan Water District 0.205 1,327,888 City Of Hermosa Beach Certificates Of Participation 100.000 4,588,761 Los Angeles County Sanitation District South Bay Cities Authority 15.434 1,174,774 Los Angeles County West Mosquito ' Abatement District Certificates Of Participation 1.001 8,597 Total gross direct and over- lapping bonded debt 18,904,738 (1) Less: Los Angeles County Certificates of Participation (100% self-supporting from leasehold revenues on properties in Marina Del Rey) 490,617 Total net direct and overlapping bonded debt $18,414,121 Ratios To Assessed Valuation: Direct Debt 0.280-. Total Gross Debt 1.15% Total Net Debt 1.12% Share Of Authorized And Unsold Bonds: Metropolitan Water District $102,500 Los Angeles County Flood Control District $70,295 State School Building Aid Repayable As Of June 30, 1994: $0 (1) Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes, revenue, mortgage revenue and tax allocation bonds and nonbonded capital lease obligations. Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc. 100 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DEMOGRAPHIC STATISTICS June 30, 1994 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) 101 (2) Per (3) (4) (1) Capita Unemployment School Year Population Income Rate Enrollment 1984-85 18,559 5.0 665 1985-86 19,142 $21,588 4.7 712 1986-87 19,383 4.1 1,107 1987-88 19,757 25,950 3.4 1,108 1988-89 19,764 3.3 1,159 1989-90 19,673 33,510 3.8 1,173 1990-91 18,286 6.0 993 1991-92 18,414 7.0 798 1992-93 18,595 6.8 732 1993-94 18,714 2.6 778 Data Sources: (1) State of California Department of Finance, estimated population. (2) U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, estimated per capita income available approximately every two years through 1989-90. Next scheduled available will be the year 2000. (3) State of California Employment Development Department, City's rates unavailable prior to 1983. Expressed as a percentage, estimated based on ratio to County movement since 1990 Census. (4) Hermosa Beach School District. 101 = = M = = = = r = = = = M = M = = = = CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION VALUE, PROPERTY VALUE AND BANK DEPOSITS June 30, 1994 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Sources: Construction values - City of Hermosa Beach Department of Building and Safety. Bank deposits - Decision Research Science, Inc. (Includes Savings and Loans) 102 Commercial Residential No. Of Fiscal Year Permits Valuation 1984-85 239 $13,306,320 1985-86 264 14,686,577 1986-87 286 19,943,665 1987-88 234 13,735,644 1988-89 229 15,911,529 1989-90 293 17,707,285 1990-91 254 21,057,952 1991-92 242 10,587,184 1992-93 265 6,162,969 1993-94 259 3,085,519 Sources: Construction values - City of Hermosa Beach Department of Building and Safety. Bank deposits - Decision Research Science, Inc. (Includes Savings and Loans) 102 Commercial Total No. Of Assessed Bank Deposits Permits Valuation Valuation (In Thousands) 48 $6,594,037 $799,423,209 $88,544 50 5,040,953 858,247,084 90,368 49 13,176,147 929,930,478 107,421 33 867,180 1,050,617,460 109,485 38 3,630,235 1,112,969,023 144,798 38 397,350 1,258,482,588 148,834 46 530,150 1,414,398,777 155,121 72 686,949 1,541,561,154 173,714 65 986,546 1,636,787,966 134,562 47 1,124,332 1,669,796,728 128,161 Sources: Construction values - City of Hermosa Beach Department of Building and Safety. Bank deposits - Decision Research Science, Inc. (Includes Savings and Loans) 102 Company And Policy Number Fidelity and Deposit #30285086 Fidelity and Deposit #30285009 Merchants Bonding Co. CA 207053 Fidelity and Deposit #0956182-1 Fidelity and Deposit #30487083 Fidelity and Deposit #30285200-40 Fidelity and Deposit #30486336 General Reinsurance *XD083B (Limit $20 mil.) Fireman's Fund XLX-165-7756 (limit statutory above $20 mil.) Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) #CAPL 1009 Federal Insurance Co. #659-30-07 Federal Insurance Co. #659-30-03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH SCHEDULE OF INSURANCE June 30, 1994 (Unaudited) Policy Period Limits And Coverages Annual Premium 11/7/93-94 $100,000 Public Official Bond $500 $10 Mil. limit for "Bodily Injury or for Viki Copeland as Finance Director Property Damage or Personal Injury or 11/12/91-95 $10,000 Public Officials Bond Public Officials" E&Q. $355 7/1/93-94 for Elaine Doerfling as City Clerk (4 year pre -paid) 1/17/92-1/16/96 $10,000 Notary Bond for Naoma Valdes, $35 Deputy City Clerk (4 year pre -paid) 7/1/92-95 $25,000 Public Employee dishonest clause $1,617 Personal Property, EDP Equipment, Media and (blanket bond) $2,500 deductible (3 year pre -paid) 1/3/94-97 $100,000 Public Officials Bond for $946 Stephen R. Burrell as City Manager 10/12/90-94 $10,000 Notary Bond for Elaine Doerfling $100 (4 year pre -paid) 4/1/93-11/24/94 $100,000 Public Official Bond for John $776 Workman as City Treasurer 7/1/93-94 Statutory Excess Workers' Compensation $11,704 $1 Mil. Employers' Liability $300,000 S.I.R. 7/1/93-94 Excess Liability Insurance $264,015 $250,000 S.I.R. $10 Mil. limit for "Bodily Injury or Property Damage or Personal Injury or Public Officials" E&Q. 7/1/93-94 Comprehensive and Collision Coverage $2,325 with $5,000 deductible for Scheduled High Value Vehicles 7/1/93-94 "All risk" of Direct Physical Loss or Damage $14,881 excluding Flood and Earthquake, to Real and Personal Property, EDP Equipment, Media and Extra Expense, Rents, and Mobile Equipment. 103 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL TAXPAYERS June 30, 1994 (Unaudited) Source: Hinderliter, de Llamas and Associates. Note: Reported data believed to be reliable but accuracy is not guaranteed. 104 Percentage Of Total Assessed Assessed Value Assessed Value JMB Income Properties Ltd. XII $23,185,164 1.39 Merchants Asset Management Corporation 20,060,340 1.20 Playa Pacifica Ltd. 9,858,489 .59 Allen H. Ginsburg Trust 9,180,709 .55 Hermosa Beach Investment Company 9,125,545 .55 International Church 7,201,192 .43 Cheng Yi & Ying Yin Chang 6,147,618 .37 James F. Caird Trust 5,226,715 .31 George L. Schuler Trust 5,055,057 .30 Steven R. and Alice Legare Trust 4,902,378 .29 Source: Hinderliter, de Llamas and Associates. Note: Reported data believed to be reliable but accuracy is not guaranteed. 104 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA MAJOR EMPLOYERS June 30, 1994 (Unaudited) Name City of Hermosa Beach Vasek Polak, Inc. Hope Chapel Von's Descanso Hermosa Beach Unified School District Body Glove Ralph's Learned Lumber Lucky Supermarket 105 Type Of Business Local Government Automobile Sales/Service Church Grocery Store Restaurant Public Schools Sports Apparel/Manufacturer Grocery Store Wholesale/Retail Lumber Grocery Store Sales Retail stores: Apparel stores Food stores Packaged liquor stores Eating and drinking places Home furnishings and appliances Building materials and farm tools Automobile dealers and supplies Service stations Other, including drug stores Total retail stores All other outlets Total all outlets Source: State Board of Equalization. (a) Service stations were not separately identified. M = = = = = = M CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TAXABLE SALES BY CATEGORY June 30, 1994 Calendar Years 1984-93 (Unaudited) (In Thousands) 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 $1,927 $2,187 $2,174 $2,110 $2,093 $2,482 $2,272 $2,474 $2,506 $2,017 11,721 13,979 16,828 17,876 17,166 18,053 17,970 18,516 18,318 15,824 2,878 2,585 2,436 2,110 2,212 2,400 2,385 2,127 1,955 1,808 17,902 21,267 24,973 28,364 30,805 30,917 30,718 28,437 28,459 27,766 2,932 3,295 3,215 2,877 1,852 2,199 2,203 1,721 1,668 1,636 5,508 5,663 6,671 8,140 9,402 10,971 9,813 8,449 7,296 7,517 36,570 46,230 47,912 33,464 44,948 48,628 42,510 28,487 24,911 24,968 5,837 5,743 4,752 5,085 (a) 4,919 5,284 5,623 (a) (a) 9,790 12,581 16.648 20,914 27,892 23,796 24.125 22,103 26,796 22,710 95,065 113,530 125,609 120,940 136,370 144,365 137,280 117,937 111,909 104,246 12,935 15,495 13,643 14,946 14,136 16,028 17,333 16,681 15,635 16,774 $108,000 $129.025 $139,252 $135,886 $150,506 $160,393 $154,613 $134,618 $127,544 $121,020 106 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICS June 30, 1994 (Unaudited) Date of incorporation January 14, 1907 Form of government Council -Manager Area 1.3 square miles Miles of streets 47.4 Number of street lights 583 (City Owned), 819 (Electric Utility) Fire protection: Number of stations 1 Number of firefighters and paramedics 18 Police protection: Number of stations 1 Number of sworn officers 41 Sanitary sewers 34 miles Building permits issued 330 Recreation and culture: Number of parks 18 with 16.38 acres Beach 36.52 acres Hermosa Valley Green Belt (open space park) 19.50 acres Community Theatre 1 Employees: Full-time 162 107 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Recommendation: December 6, 1994 Regular meeting of December 13, 1994 Biltmore Park - Award of Contract It is recommended that City Council: Award the construction contract for the Biltmore Park Project to Delta Landscape, Inc. in the amount of $78,871.99. 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the construction contract subject to appoval by the City Attorney. 3. Direct the City Clerk to reject all other bids and release all bid bonds. 4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council, upon completion of work. 5. Authorize the transfer of $18,832.50 from the Clark Building Project(CIP 94-616) to the Biltmore Park Project(94-523). 6. Authorize funds in the amount of $6,000 be appropriated from the Lighting and Landscape District Fund to the Biltmore Park Project(CIP 94-523). 7. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within budget. Background: The City Council at their meeting of September 27, 1994 approved the construction - documents for the Biltmore Park Project, directed staff to make changes to the plans per their recommendations and advertise for competetive bids for the construction of the park. Bid documents were prepared such that individual items of work could be added or deleted from the contract as the budget allows. Analysis: On October 27, 1994 the City advertised for closed bids and on December 1, 1994 eleven bids were received and opened by the Public Works Department. The results of the bid opening are as follows: 1. Delta Landscape, Inc. $78,871.99 2. Metro Builders $82,491.00 3. Alpha -Omega Const. $83,880.00 4. Sunrise Landscape, Inc. $83,992.88 5. Thomsen Landscape $849099.40 6. Advanced Construction $85,829.38 7. S&M Landscape, Inc. $92,873.65 8. Marina $97,387.09 9. Malibu -Pacific $98,245.00 10. Ryco Construction $114,182.90 11. Bennett Enterprises $130,744.30 The Public Works Department has reveiwed the low bidders bid documents and has found them to be in order. Interveiws with previous clients of Delta Landscape has shown them to be competent and expedient contractors. The Public Works Department therefore recommends award of the Biltmore Park Project to Delta Landscape in the amount of $78,871.99. Fiscal Impact• The current balance of the Biltmore Park Project (CIP 94-523) is $63,200. It is suggested that $18,832.50 in Parks Facilities Recreation Tax Funds be transfered from the Clark Building Improvement Project (CIP 90-616) to cover the budget shortfall. The existing $18,832.50 balance in the Clark Building Project will not provide the estimated $106,000 of improvements necessary to bring the structure up to new siesmic codes. The Public Works Department is working with FEMA to provide federal funds of $106,000 to upgrade this historic building. These funds would become available in FY 95/96. Additional Block Grant funds would also become available for necessary ADA upgrades to the building in FY 95/96. It is therefore suggested that improvements to the Clark Building be delayed until FY 95/96 and that funds originally intended for it be transfered to the Biltmore Park Project. It is also recommended that $6,000 be appropriated from the Lighting and Landscaping Fund to cover the cost of the installation of the park area lighting conduit. This transfer would leave the Lighting and Landscaping Fund with a estimated balance of $926,027. The revised balance in the Biltmore Park Project (CIP 94-523) would be $88,032.50. This revised budget allows for construction, inspection and contingency costs. Any unexpended funds would return to the previously budgeted projects. Respectfully submitted, oseph C. Mankaw' K Capital Improvement Program Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: O-ic C-4� Viki Copeland Director of Finance jcm/a/biltawrd.doc Concur: Amy Ami ani Director of Public Works Alm . Mary Roortey✓� Director of Community Resources Stephen urrell City Manager HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL CIVIC CENTER DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIF. 90254 PARKER HERRIOT T 224 24TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CALIF. 90254 HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, CITY ATTORNEY, CITY MANAGER ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT, UNDER MUNICIPAL MATTERS NUMBER EIGHT, THE BID PROPOSAL FOR THE BILTMORE IS TO BE APPROVED. I HOPE THAT THE PLANS FOR THE PARK ARE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE THE PEOPLE VOTED, NOVEMBER 1992. THE PLANS FOR THE PARK APPROVED AT EARLIER CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WHERE NOT FOLLOWING THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THE BILTMORE PARK ORDINANCE. WE WERE NOT ABLE TO SEE THE PLANS FOR THE PARK WHICH WAS APPROVED AT AN EARLIER CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND I ADDRESSED SOME OF THE VIOLATIONS. I DO NOT KNOW IF YOU HAVE SINCE CORRECTED THOSE ERRORS OR NOT, SINCE THE PACKET FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING HAS ALSO NO PLANS FOR THE PUBLIC TO REVIEW, WHICH IS IN VIOLATION OF THE BROWN ACT. WILL THE SANDY AREA NEAR THE STRAND BE ELIMINATED? AS MS. ROONEY SAID IT WOULD BE AT AN EARLIER M EETING? WILL THE SEATING WALL BE ELIMINATED? ONLY SOFTSCAPE IS PERMITTED IN THE BILTMORE PARK PER THE ORDINANCE. WILL THERE BE BENCHES TO VIEW THE OCEAN? AS PERMITTED BY THE BILTMORE PARK ORDINANCE? WILL THE BERMS BE ELIMINATED FOR SAFETY REASONS, AND BECAUSE THE ORDINANCE DOES NOT PERMIT BERMS? HAVE YOU REDUCED THE WIDTH OF THE "WALKWAYS"? THE BILTMORE PARK ORDINANCE DOES NOT STATE WALKWAYS ARE EVEN PERM=D, AND WALKWAYS 10 FEET WIDE ARE UNNECESSARY. POLICE CARS ARE NOT PERMITTED BY THE BILTMORE PARK ORDINANCE. THE POLICE CAN SEE ALL OF THE BILTMORE PARK IF THERE ARE NO BERMS, WHERE PEOPLE CAN HIDE, ETC. WHY DESIGN A PARK IN A WAY TO CAUSE A NEED FOR A POLICE PATROL CAR TO GO INTO THE PARK? ALL THESE YEARS THE POLICE AND THE PUBLIC COULD SEE THE WHOLE BILTMORE PARK AREA FROM THE STRAND, 14TH STREET, 15TH STREET, AND 15TH COURT. I HOPE YOU DO NOT PERMIT THE BILTMORE PARK ORDINANCE TO BE VIOLATED. T44F-��. WILL THE PUBLIC BE ABLE TO HELP LANDSCAPE THE BILTMORE PARK, BY PLANTING TREES, FLOWERS, GRASS, ETC, PER THE PARK ORDINANCE? RESPECTFULLY, PARKER HERRIOTT Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Recommendation: i�1.fiC�ISY'1%' December 6, 1994 Regular meeting of December 13, 1994 South Park - Award of Contract It is recommended that City Council: Award the construction contract for Phase I the South Park Project to Advanced Construction in the amount of $332,679.94. 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the construction contract subject to appoval by the City Attorney. Direct the City Clerk to reject all other bids and release all bid bonds. 4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council, upon completion of work. Authorize the transfer of $20,000 from the Street Improvement Project(CIP 94- 170) to the South Park Project(CIP 94-515). 6. Appropriate Lighting and Landscape District Funds in the amount of $30,000 to the South Park Project(CIP 94-515). 7. Appropriate Sewer Funds in the amount of $9,000 to the South Park Project(CIP 94-515). 8. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within budget. Background: The City Council at their meeting of October 25, 1994 approved the construction documents for the South Park Project and directed staff to advertise for competetive bids for the construction of the park. Bid documents were prepared such that individual items of work could be added or deleted from the contract as the budget allows. Both Phase I P] and Phase II were included in the bid though the award of contract is based upon the lowest respondsible bid for the Phase I portion of work. This allows for the addition of items from Phase II in this contract if additional funds become available. Analysis: On October 27, 1994 the City advertised for closed bids and on December 1, 1994 nine bids were received and opened by the Public Works Department. The results of the bid opening are as follows: The Public Works Department has reveiwed the low bidders bid documents and have found them to be in order. Interveiws with previous clients of Advanced Construction have revealed them to be competent and expedient contractors. The Public Works Department therefore recommends award of the South Park Project to Advanced Construction in the amount of $332,679.94. Fiscal Impact: The projected actual costs for Phase I of the South Park Project are expected to be: Construction Contract $332,679.94 Contract Administration/Inspection $15,000.00 Contingencies -3% of Contract $9,980.00 Total $357,659.94 The current balance of the South Park Project (CIP 94-515) is $298,702. Additional funding to cover the shortfall is suggested from the following sources: Phase I Phase II 1. Advanced Construction $332,679.94 $244,445.00 2. Hondo Company $345,653.50 $311,735.00 3. Sunrise Landscape $355,369.87 $345,301.14 4. Metro Builders $361,426.00 $308,574.00 5. Fredrick Towers $379,335.50 $298,014.00 6. Green Coast $403,929.60 $397,440.00 7. MJS Construction $406,791.75 $258,399.00 8. Terra -Cal Construction $426,819.02 $242,011.00 9. Ryco Construction $432,009.80 $250,870.00 The Public Works Department has reveiwed the low bidders bid documents and have found them to be in order. Interveiws with previous clients of Advanced Construction have revealed them to be competent and expedient contractors. The Public Works Department therefore recommends award of the South Park Project to Advanced Construction in the amount of $332,679.94. Fiscal Impact: The projected actual costs for Phase I of the South Park Project are expected to be: Construction Contract $332,679.94 Contract Administration/Inspection $15,000.00 Contingencies -3% of Contract $9,980.00 Total $357,659.94 The current balance of the South Park Project (CIP 94-515) is $298,702. Additional funding to cover the shortfall is suggested from the following sources: County Prop. A Grant(CIP 94-515) $219,729.00 Parks Facilities Rec. Tax(CIP 94-515) $78,973.00 Existing South Park Budget(CIP 94-515) $298,702.00 Appropriation from Lighting & Landscape Fund $30,000.00 Appropriation from Sewer Fund $9,000.00 Transfer from Street Improvements (CIP 94-170) $20,000.00 Proposed Revised South Park Budget $357,702.00 Funds shown above will be utilized on items of work most closely related to the original intent of the fund, for instance, funds transfered from the Street Improvements Project(SLTPP Grant Funds) will be used to construct the deceleration lane for the park entrance. The balance for the Street Improvement Project after the transfer of $20,000 to the South Park Project will be $107,415. Likewise, Lighting and Landscape funds will be used to install the lighting conduit for the park area lights and Sewer Funds will be expended on plumbing and drainage improvements. Fund balances for these two sources will be reduced to $896,027 and $3,491,000 respectively. Respectfully submitted, oseph C. Manka ch Capital Improvement Program Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance jcm/a/spawrd.doc Concur: t/ �-� Amy rani Director of Public Works Ma y Dire for of Community Resources Stephen urrell City Manager LT C K.1� OOCK 0 City of Hermosa Beach November 30, 1994 Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Attention: Mrs. Amy Amirani, Director of Public Works Subject: Proposal to provide Construction Management Services for the Construction of Improvements to South School Park Dear Mrs. Amirani Pursuant to ous conversation today, the following proposal defines the services and manhour budget for the above mentioned project. • Attend project meetings beginning with the preconstruction meeting in January 1995 • Prepare Agenda and meeting minutes of all project meetings • Prepare site visit reports for each visit to the job site outlining contractor activities, potential problems, suggested solutions, changes to the original contract, and other important matters. • Review contractor requests for additional compensation related to changes to the original contract. • Coordinate special inspections by appropriate city and independent testing agencies. • Track the status of submittals, contractor requests for information, and change orders • Provide overall quality assurance that the project is constructed in accordance with the contract specifications. • Review the contractor's schedule for compliance with contract • Review contractor requests for potential change orders and prepare change orders to the contract • Take 24 photographs weekly and provide in album format • Monitor the contractors record drawings prior to each payment review. • Review and recommend appropriate contractor progress payments. TRACK IT MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. 322 S. Miraleste Drive • Suite 169 • San Pedro, CA 90732 •Tel: (310) 832-7130 9 Fax: (310) 832-3443 • Review the contractors Safety Program and implementation plan. • Coordinate all project matters with the Architect and City staff. • Prepare a punchlist of remaining work and deficiencies for the contractor to complete at the end of the project prior to filing the notice of completion. It is understood that the City will provide the following ; • Independent materials testing laboratory • Office space It is anticipated that 10 - 15 hours per week for the four month duration will be needed to perform the above mentioned tasks. Our hourly rate is $ 75.00. Mr. Creager will be our proposed Construction Manager. Should you require additional information, please feel free to call. mes H. Creager Vice President TRACK IT MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. 322 S. Miraleste Drive • Suite 169 • San Pedro, CA 90732 •Tel: (310) 832-7130 • Fax: (310) 832-3443 CITY OF A HERMOS--A BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:, Amy Amirani, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Sewer & Storm Drain Video Inspection - To Recommend Award of Bid DATE: December 13, 1994 It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Award the subject contract to National Plant Services, Inc. for an amount of 92,999.96 to video inspect the entire City sewer lines and the entire Storm Drain System. 2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes within the budget. On December 12, 1994, four (4) proposals were received by the Department of Public Works. They were publicly opened at 2:00 p.m. in the Public Works Department in the presence of two (2) of the bidders. A detailed analysis of each bid is shown on the attached Addendum. To summarize, National Plant Services, Inc. is the low bidder overall. Budget: The total cost of the low bid for video inspection is as follows: Sewers: $ 81,799.96 (Alternative 3) Storm Drain System: 11,200.00 _ Subtotal: $ 92,999.96 7% Contingency: 6,510.00 (Additional Cleanup) TOTAL: $ 99,509.96 Alternative 3 is recommended by staff for the following reasons: 1. There will be a 6% saving to the City if all sewer lines are video inspected at once. 2. Prior to video inspection, the sewer pipes must be cleaned. This cleaning will prolong the life and minimize the future maintenance cost of the existing sewer system. 3. This cleaning will reduce the causes of sewer backups (and City liability) by removing roots, grease and other build ups that act as obstacles in the system. 4. Video inspection of all sewer lines will determine exact location of all service_ lateral connections which the City lacks at the present time. 5. Video inspection of all sewer lines will show the exact physical condition of each pipe which staff can use to prioritize future sewer rehabilitation projects. Respectfully submitted, CONCU s Amy Ami ani Steve B'UrrAJ Director of Public Works City Manager thb/a:sewmem.doc J w C:) 0 � Z s ADDENDUM ANALYSIS OF BIDS FOR SANITARY SEWER & STORM DRAIN VIDEO INSPECTION NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES; INC. (Lowest Bidder) SANITARY SEWER LIGHT CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION *Alternative 3 is Alternatives 1 & 2 combined. ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Medium $ .24 Heavy $ .60 Approx. Unit Diameter Alt. Quantity Unit Price Total Ratinq 1 67,287 L. F. $ .50 $ 33,643.50 HPI >6 2 110,539 L. F. $ .48 $ 53,058.72 HPI<6 3* 177,826 L. F. $ .46 $ 81,799.96 0<HPI<10 *Alternative 3 is Alternatives 1 & 2 combined. ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Medium $ .24 Heavy $ .60 TOTAL: ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Light $ .55 Medium $ 1.10 Heavy $ 2.25 II. EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING & EQUIPMENT, INC. Total $ 2,800.00 $ 5,950.00 $ 2,450.00 $ 11,200.00 SANITARY SEWER LIGHT CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION STORM DRAIN SYSTEM VIDEO INSPECTION Approx. Diameter Alt. Item Quantity Inches Unit Unit Price 1 8,000 48-60 L. F. $ .35 2 17,000 30-60 L. F. $ .35 3 7,000 8-24 L.F. $ .35 TOTAL: ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Light $ .55 Medium $ 1.10 Heavy $ 2.25 II. EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING & EQUIPMENT, INC. Total $ 2,800.00 $ 5,950.00 $ 2,450.00 $ 11,200.00 SANITARY SEWER LIGHT CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Medium $ .25 Heavy $ .35 Approx. Unit Alt. Quantity Unit Price Total Rating 1 67,287 L. F. $ .58 $ 39,026.46 HPI >6 2 110,539 L. F. $.58 $ 64,112.62 HPI <6 3 177,826 L. F. $ .58 $103,139.08 0<HPI<10 ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Medium $ .25 Heavy $ .35 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM VIDEO INSPECTION TOTAL: $ 13,440.00 ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Light $ 2.25 Medium $ 5.00 Heavy $ 10.00 HOFFMAN SOUTHWEST CORPORATION SANITARY SEWER LIGHT CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION Approx. Diameter Unit Item Item Quantity Inches Unit Unit Price Total 1 8,000 48-60 L. F. $ .42 $ 3,360.00 2 17,000 30-60 L. F. $ .42 $ 7,140.00 3 7,000 8-24 L.F. $ .42 $ 2,940.00 TOTAL: $ 13,440.00 ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Light $ 2.25 Medium $ 5.00 Heavy $ 10.00 HOFFMAN SOUTHWEST CORPORATION SANITARY SEWER LIGHT CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Medium $ .25 Heavy $ .35 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM VIDEO INSPECTION Approx. Diameter Unit Item Alt. Quantity Unit Price Total Rating 1 67,287 L. F. $ .65 $ 43,736.55 HPI >6 2 110,539 L. F. $ .63 $ 69,639.57 HPI<6 3 177,826 L. F. $ .61 $108,473.86 0<HPI<10 ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Medium $ .25 Heavy $ .35 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM VIDEO INSPECTION TOTAL: ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Light $ .25 Medium $ .50 Heavy $ .70 Total $ 2,400.00 $ 5,100.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 9,600.00 Approx. Diameter Item Quantity Inches Unit Unit Price 1 8,000 48-60 L. F. $ .30 2 17,000 30-36 L. F. $ .30 3 7,000 8-24 L.F. $ .30 TOTAL: ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Light $ .25 Medium $ .50 Heavy $ .70 Total $ 2,400.00 $ 5,100.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 9,600.00 IV. PSSI SANITARY SEWER LIGHT CLEANING & VIDEO INSPECTION ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Medium $ .75 Heavy $ 1.25 Approx. Unit Item Alt. Quantity Unit Price Total Rating 1 67,287 L. F. $ .95 $ 63,922.65 HPI >6 2 110,539 L. F. $ .95 $105,012.05 HPI<6 3 177,826 L. F. $ .95 $168,934.70 0<HPI<10 ADDITIONAL CLEANING (If Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Medium $ .75 Heavy $ 1.25 Total $ 6,000.00 $10,200.00 $ 3,500.00 $19,700.00 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM VIDEO INSPECTION Approx. Diameter Item Quantity Inches Unit Unit Price 1 8,000 48-60 L. F. $ .75 2 17,000 30-60 L. F. $ .60 3 7,000 8-24 L.F. $ .50 TOTAL: ADDITIONAL CLEANING (if Needed) Type of Cleaning Unit Price Per Foot Light $ 1.00 Medium $ 3.00 Heavy $ 5.00 Total $ 6,000.00 $10,200.00 $ 3,500.00 $19,700.00 R` M Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 1, 1994 Regular meeting of December 13, 1994 SEWER AND STORM DRAIN VIDEO INSPECTION Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve: 1. Award of contract to the responsible bidder to televise all or portions of the sewer and storm drain lines within the city. Background: At the November 8, 1994 City Council meeting, ITX study was accepted and staff was directed to prepare scope of work and advertise Request For Proposals to televise (CCTV) all sewer and storm drain lines within the city. Recommendation also included preparation of the RFP so that all sewer pipes with HPI index of higher than 6 be separated to determine if it is cost effective to televise those lines at this time. Analysis: Closed Circuit Television (CCN) inspection of the sewer and storm drain network is the primary means of determining the physical condition of a gravity flow infrastructure system. Unlike other more visible facilities, such as the pavement network, the sanitary sewer and storm drain systems cannot be easily inspected and consequently evaluated for its physical condition. As a result it is possible for the network to deteriorate much more rapidly than it would where rehabilitation and maintenance activities implemented at strategic periods in the infrastructure's life of this very expensive infrastructure, as well as assist in establishing the rehabilitation priorities. The majority of the City's sanitary sewer network is rapidly approaching the end of its life -cycle and consequently will have to be replaced. Approximately 35,000 feet (20% of the network) has been televised over 10 the last 10 years. It is recommended that the remainder of the network be televised to establish its physical deterioration, and if possible, any rehabilitative strategies which could prolong the remaining life of the pipes. In particular, once all the non -televised pipes have been televised, then, a regular inspection program such that every pipe is checked every 5 to 10 years can be implemented. This will not only highlight urgent problems in the network, but minor problems as well, which through minor maintenance activities, can be alleviated before developing into more serious and costly problems. Hydroflushing of the sewer system will be conducted prior to televising. This hydroflushing method is the best preventive maintenance strategy which commonly used to prolong the life of the system. As part of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, inspection of all sewer and storm drain systems is a highly recommended Best Management Practice. The result of the storm drain video inspection will be incorporated into the Master Plan of Hydrology. The scope of work for this project was prepared and distributed and advertised. Proposals are expected to be received on December 12, 1994. The results of the bids received will be available for your discussion at the City Council meeting. Fiscal Impact: Total available funds: CIP 92-408 FY 93-94 Sewer Fund Respectfully submitted, OnUO�" Amy Amirani Director of Public Works aa/te11213.cc $3.5 million YPT� StepheA V13urrell City Manager m h4 cover. doc s 0 m REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 1994 SEWER AND STORM DRAIN VIDEO INSPECTION Completion: 20 Working Days for Storm Drain System 90 Working Days for Sewer Main System PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Telephone: (310) 318-0212 Homayoun Behboodi CIP Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS 2. SCOPE OF WORK 3. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 4. INSURANCE AND CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS 5. AREA MAPS 6. AGREEMENT mh/a: svi/contents.doc NOVEMBER 30, 1994 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS SEWER AND STORM DRAIN VIDEO INSPECTION THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH is requesting proposals for consulting services to conduct sewer and storm drain video inspection. INSTRUCTIONS and the Scope of. Work are attached for your information (see Scope of Work). SEALED PROPOSALS will be received at the office of the Public Works Department, City of Hermosa Beach, California, until 2:00 p.m. on December 12, 1994. Late proposals will not be accepted. The City of Hermosa Beach shall not, in any event, be liable for any precontractural expenses incurred by the Consultant. The Consultant shall not include such expenses as part of the price as proposed in response to the RFP. Precontractural expenses are defined as expenses incurred by Consultant in: 1. Preparing the response to this proposal (RFP); 2. Submitting the proposal to the City of Hermosa Beach; 3. Negotiating with the City of Hermosa Beach in any matter related to this proposal; 4. Any other expenses incurred by Consultant prior to the date of the executed agreement. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to withdraw this RFP any time without prior notice. Further, the City of Hermosa Beach makes no representations that any agreement will be awarded to any Consultant responding to this RFP. The City of Hermosa Beach expressly reserves the right to postpone proposal opening for its own convenience. 1 The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted. Any award made for this consultant engagement will be made to the consultant, which, in the opinion of the City, is best qualified. The City will make payments no more than once monthly on approved invoices up to the negotiated fee. Payment for additional work, if any, will be negotiated as required. Final payment will be made after approval and acceptance of the work. A Firm -Fixed Price (FFP) agreement is contemplated at this time. Funding for this project will be from local revenue sources. All data, documents and other products used or developed during the project will remain the property of the City upon completion of the project. Notice is hereby given that the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, State of California, has ascertained the prevailing rates of per diem wages as evidenced in most recent edition of State of California, Department of Transportation, Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, General Prevailing Wage Rates Schedule, in the locality in which the work is to be done, for each craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the contract in accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 to 1781 of the Labor Code; said prevailing rates are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with Section 1776 of the Labor Code as amended, the Contractor shall submit a certified copy of the complete project payroll record to the Engineer, prior to final acceptance of the contract work. The Contractor shall, in the performance of the work and improvements, conform to the Labor Code and other laws of the State of California and the laws of the Federal Government of the United States applicable thereto. No contract will be awarded to a Contractor who has not been licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9, Division III, of the Business and Professions Code. Each bidder shall also submit with his proposal a List of Subcontractors and Subconsultants. 2 Plans may be seen and forms of proposal, bonds, contract, and specifications may be obtained at the Office of the Director of Public Works, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California. If you have any questions, please contact Homayoun Behboodi at (310) 318-212. Thank you for your time and interest in the City of Hermosa Beach. Sincerely, Amy A irani Director of Public Works mh/a: svi/noticel.doc 3 SCOPE OF WORK SEWER AND STORM DRAIN VIDEO INSPECTION General The Contractor shall be required to televise in color the City of Hermosa Beach Sewer Main and Storm Drain Systems both City and County's within the City limit. The project will be done in two phases. Phase I is the storm drain video inspection, and Phase II is the sewer main video inspection. Television inspection shall be accomplished within the area specified by Exhibit I attached, and shall be accomplished on a priority basis. The locations of the sewer mains and sewer manholes will be supplied by the City. The City reserves the right to make these changes in the priorities of the locations to be televised and agrees that these changes shall not exceed 20% of the locations shown. The Contractor shall light clean all sections of sewer main prior to television inspection in order to televise the line completely and to the satisfaction of the City inspection personnel. The Contractor shall cut interfering roots and other lodged material/debris, but shall not be expected to repair or replace sewer lines with mechanical offsets or physical failure. Storm drains will not require cleaning prior to televising. All Structural obstructions shall be verified by City inspection personnel. The Contractor is responsible for removal of all debris, sand, roots or any other materials from the pipelines before entering the pump stations. Removed materials shall be hauled and disposed by the Contractor with no additional cost to the City as part of this contract. If stringing method is used, the string lines shall be removed upon completion of the video inspection. The Contractor is responsible for providing water and payment of water supply. In addition, all necessary traffic controls shall be provided by the Contractor. The City will allow over night parking at the request of the Contractor. The Contractor shall furnish all equipment, materials, manpower, and safety equipment in order to complete the job in a safe and workmanlike manner. The lines shall be televised with color, closed-circuit equipment and recorded on standard VHS equipment and shall be accompanied by an audio narration of the inspection performed by the television inspection operator. Requirements The services to be provided will include the inspection and documentation of all sewer and storm drain facilities throughout the City. These lines are to be inspected using a video (closed circuit television) camera meeting the specifications of the City. During the inspection, the following data is to be collected: 1. Size and type of pipe, 2. Facility number, manhole numbers, and above ground location. 4 3. Overall Length, with the color picture to show -running footage on the screen. Linear measurement through pipes must be accurate to +/- 1 percent. Also displayed on monitor shall be date of inspection and a continuous forward and reverse read-out of camera distance from the access hole of reference. 4. Condition of the pipe using defect codes and type of defects outlined in the City's 'Video Camera Inspection - Storm Drain Defect Manual". 5. The exact location of all defects observed. 6. Location, type and size of any potential undocumented corrections. 7. Location and/or source of any potential illegal discharges or chemical contaminant. 8. Miscellaneous information including date, time, operator, weather, flow direction, camera direction, tape number, etc. All data collected shall be presented to the City in a final report typed and formatted in a manner acceptable to the City. Camera Soecifications At a minimum, all camera equipment shall consist of self-contained, closed-circuit television camera combined with an "in-line'; solid state, color video camera, and a monitoring unit connected by a coaxial cable. The unit shall be fully waterproof and shall have a self- contained lighting system capable of providing a clear monitor picture, and lighting the periphery of the pipe of a minimum illumination level of 100 foot-candles. Changeable lighting fixtures may be required to achieve proper illumination since the pipe size varies. The camera must also have a rotating lens to provide 360 degree pictures of joints or other areas of the pipe. The Contractor shall use equipment specially designed and constructed for storm drain inspection and televising. The camera must have its own light source of suitable output intensity to provide a clear picture of the entire periphery of various pipe sizes and Reinforced Concrete Box (RCB) larger than 3'1" in height. The camera, television monitor, transporter and other components of the video system shall be capable of producing a picture quality which is adequate for the purpose of the inspection as stated herein. The adequacy of the proposed equipment and picture shall be demonstrated to the City, if so requested, prior to start of work. Cost of such demonstration, If required, shall be borne by the proposing Contractor. Recording equipment Recording equipment shall be provided in an enclosed vehicle suitable to record from the video camera the entire inspection on color video tape, Super VHS (1/2" format), complete with data input for titles, reference numbers, defects, connections, and continuous display of distance from the initial pipe entrance location. All video tapes shall become the property of the City. The video tape shall be of quality that all minor defects (hairline cracks, etc.) are clearly visible and the color of the pipe inspected be true to actual conditions. A monitor located on site shall provide a clear color picture of sufficient size and clarity to be easily readable by the Contractor, and it shall clearly define the details of the interior of the storm 5 drain. The picture quality on the monitor shall provide a continuous 400 line resolution video picture. The television inspection, monitoring and recording shall be performed by technicians with proven experience records and the Contractor shall, if requested, furnish qualification details for each technician. The camera shall be moved through the lines in an upstream direction, unless otherwise approved or directed by the City. The maximum rate of travel for a 36" pipe shall be 30 feet per minute and 45 feet per minute for a 60" pipe. All other pipe sizes shall have a maximum rate of travel similar to ratio of 36" pipe. During inspection, the monitoring technician shall, in addition to his/her audio and video tape record of conditions, report in writing the location of all defects and physical deficiencies using the terminology and nomenclature as provided by the City, manholes, junction and transition structures, laterals (noting if lateral is shown on the plans), all indicated infiltrations, unusual debris (carts, tires, etc.), exfiltration, swales, deflected joints, collapsed sections, deposits_ and other conditions or data pertinent to the physical condition of the storm drain. Conditions and defects shall be located by footage counter and video clock reference. Contractor's proposed report shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The camera shall be stopped and/or backed up to view and analyze conditions that appear unusual or uncommon to a storm drain in good condition. There shall be no loss of video quality at any time. As video is being produced, the technician shall provide and record an audio narration of the inspection (on the video tape), to include identification of the storm drain location, identification of starting and terminating access manholes, inspection direction, and complete descriptions of the line conditions as they are encountered. The audio portion of the video tape shall be free from electrical interference and background noise, Audio dubbing after the inspection will not be permitted. If the camera cannot pass the entire storm drain from its starting direction, due to blockage, the reach shall be inspected as far as possible from both directions. The inspection reports for the reach shall include an identification of the location of the blockage. the Contractor shall notify the City staff immediately of any such obstruction so that it may be verified and /or repaired. The Contractor shall coordinate and cooperate with City forces when clearing blockages or making repairs becomes necessary. Video tapes showing debris on the lens, condensation, poor or out of focus images, poor audio, or otherwise poor image quality shall be cause for rejection and will necessitate re -televising at the Contractor's expense. The City reserves the right to reject any video tape which in its sole judgment is not of acceptable quality. Traffic control shall be the responsibility of the Contractor and shall conform to the latest edition of the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH). Contractor shall obtain a Right of Way/Lane, Closure Permit. Lane closures on non-residential streets will be limited to the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Contact Public Works for permit assistance. I Contractor shall provide all necessary personnel, instruments, equipment and materials to perform the described services. The Contractor must be accessible at the work site at all times. Contractor shall attend one meeting per week with City staff to discuss project progress. The Contractor shall video inspect the storm drain system without cleaning. If the storm drain line is plugged such that the camera will not pass through, if requested by the City, the Contractor shall use any method to clean the storm drain based on the light, medium or heavy cleaning rates proposed. Quality Assurance Random weekly viewing of video tapes will be conducted by the City during the inspection work to ensure that all documentation items (i.e, defects, connections) required are being noted. If it is determined that the Contractor's inspection log is incomplete or inaccurate, or if the clarity or lighting of the video is unacceptable, the Contractor will be required to re -inspect the pipe at no cost to the City. Deliverables Contractor shall submit video tape and written typed reports summarizing all defects and conditions specified above. The tapes and reports shall be submitted on the Monday of each week for the work completed the previous week. 1. All video tapes shall be labeled (on the cassette and also on the cassette storage carton) -with the following information: (a) Tape Number (b) Date of Inspection (c) Name of Contractor (d) Pipe Size and Material (e) Number and Street or Intersection Location of Upstream Access Manhole (f) Number and Street Intersection Location of Downstream Access Manhole (g) Name of Storm Drain Facility 2. Written reports shall contain all of the following information: (a) Date and Time of Inspection (b) Name of Contractor (c) Names of Operating Technician/Inspector (d) Pipe Size and Material and Length 7 (e) Street or Intersection Location of Upstream Access Manhole (f) Street or Intersection Location of Downstream Access Manhole (g) Direction of Inspection and Videotaping Tape Number (h) Observations, Comments, Recommendations and All Service Lateral Locations Including Laterals Not Shown on Plans (undocumented) Referenced to Footage Counter and Video Clock Number (i) The Condition of all Connections (documented and undocumented) 0) Name of Storm Drain Facility (k) Corresponding Tape Number Sewer/Storm Drain video inspection log shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing work. Storm Drain Video Inspection 1. *8,000 lineal foot of 48" - 60" diameter storm drain pipe 2. *17,000 lineal foot of 30" -48" diameter storm drainpipe 3. *7,000 lineal foot of 8" - 30" diameter storm drain pipe. *Estimates only. Actual numbers may vary. Sewer Video Inspection 1. 67,287 - lineal foot of sewer mains (see map attached - HPI>6) 2. 110,539 - lineal foot of sewer mains (see map attached - HPi<6) 3. 177,826 - lineal foot of sewer mains (total of 1+2 - all sewer main within City) The Contractor shall clean all sections of sewer mains prior to television inspection in order to televise the line completely. All light cleaning shall be part of the itemized bid for televising. Separate alternative bids are required for medium and heavy cleaning. Light cleaning one or two passes with Hydrojet or rodding Medium cleaning 3-5 passes with Hydrojet or one pass with root saw Heavy cleaning 6 or more passes with Hydrojet or 2 or more passes with root saw Upon completion, typed log sheets with all observations listed and tapes shall be delivered to the City. These log sheets shall include, but not be limited to, the nearest intersection/street address location, the corresponding downstream manhole number, the total length of pipe televised, the date of inspection, the general direction of travel of the camera, the ground cover surface material, the pipe material, diameter, and section length, and the video tape counter number. In addition, the log sheets shall contain a continuous tracking of pipe length with recordation of service connections and their location in the main line in relation to the manhole from which the line is televised and a qualified and quantified I description of all observations within the pipe. The observations shall include, but not be limited to, the sample definitions shown below. In addition to the audio narration and log sheets, the Contractor shall provide a summary highlighting the more severe areas of the sewer mains and storm drains within the project area. The highlighted areas shall be referenced according to the reference numbers listed below. The summary shall also include all root intrusions within the sewer main and lateral connections. SANITARY SEWER DEFECTS Defect Name Defect Type Reference Number Circumferential Crack Structural 1 Longitudinal Crack Structural 2 Spiderweb Crack Structural 3 Broken Joint Structural 4 Sag Structural 5 Fracture Structural 6 Grease Structural 7 Line Deflection Structural 8 Corrosion Structural 9 Partial Failure Structural 10 Collapse Structural 11 Offset Joint Structural 12 Puncture Structural 13 Deposition Maintenance 14 Roots Maintenance 15 Blockage/Obstruction Maintenance 16 Evidence of Infiltration Maintenance 17 mh4svi/scope.doc 146 SCHEDULE "A" 1994 SEWER CLEANING AND VIDEO INSPECTION ALTERN- ATIVE APPROX QUANTITY UNIT LIGHT CLEANING & VIDEO INSPEC. PRICE Written in Words UNIT PRICE IN $ TOTAL 1 67,287 L. F. 2 110,539 L.F. 3 177,826 L. F. NOTE: Contractor shall quote a unit price for medium and heavy cleaning. These unit prices will be used as a bid price if such cleaning is required. MEDIUM Cleaning HEAVY Cleaning Unit Price per Foot: $�_ Unit Price per Foot: $ _ mh/svi/tables.doc W SCHEDULE "B" 1994 STORM DRAIN VIDEO INSPECTION ITEM APPROX QUANTITY DIAMETER inches UNIT VIDEO INSPECT.PRICE Written in Words UNIT PRICE IN $ ITEM TOTAL 1 8,000 48-60 L.F 2 17,000 30-36 L. F. 3 7,000 8-24 L.F. 't NOTE: Contractor shall quote a unit price for Light, Medium and Heavy cleaning. These unit prices will be used as a bid price if such cleaning is required. Light Cleaning Price per Foot: Medium Cleaning Price per Foot: $ _ Heavy Cleaning Price per Foot: $ mh/svi/tables.doc GENERAL REQUIREMENTS General Information The Department of Public Works of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, will receive sealed proposals at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California, until 2:00 PM. on Monday, December 12, 1994. Examination of Plans; Specifications, Special Provisions, and.Site of Work The Bidder is required to examine carefully the site of work and the proposal plans, specifications, and contract forms for the work contemplated, and it will be assumed that the bidder has investigated and is satisfied as to the conditions to ba..encountered, as -#o -the character-;- quality,- and quantities of work to be performed and materials to be furnished, and as to the requirements agreed that submission of a proposal shall be considered prima facie evidence that the bidder has made such examination. Proposal Form All proposals must include using the blank forms, attacched. All proposals must give the prices proposed, both in writing and figures, and must be signed by the bidder, with his address. If the proposal is made by an individual, his name and post office address must be shown. If made by firm or partnership, the name and post office address of each member of the firm or partnership must be shown. If made by corporation, the proposal must show the name of the state under the laws of which the corporation was chartered and the names, titles, and business addresses of the president, secretary, and treasurer. Each bidder shall also submit with his proposal a List of Subcontractors. Reiection of Proposals Containing Alterations, Erasures or Irregularities Proposals may be rejected if they show any alterations'of form, additions not called for, conditional or alternative bids, incomplete bids, erasures, or irregularities of any kind. Execution of Contract The contract shall be signed by the successful bidder and returned, within ten (10) days, not including Sundays, after the bidder has received notice that the contract has been awarded. No proposal shall be considered binding upon the City until the execution of the contract. Failure to execute a contract as provided herein within ten (10) days, not including Sundays, after the bidder has received notice that the contract has been awarded, shall be just cause for the annulment of the award. mh/a:svi/genreq.doc 12 LEGEND HPI Rating 8 10 6-8 4-6 2-4 0 2 -3- HERMOSA BEACH HPI Rating Information During Wet Weather Flows u PAYMENT REQUEST FORM TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, 1315 VALLEY DRIVE; HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NO. FROM: Contractor Date i Address Progress Estimatb No. Telephone Submitted by Contract Award Amount Item No. Description Contract Quantity Previous Quantity Quantity, This , Estimate Unit Price Amount This Estimate Total Quantity to Date Total Amount to Date CITY Total Approved by Less Retention Date Less Previous Billing(s) Total Amount Due form.doc PROFESSIONAL- SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 199_, at Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, through its duly elected, qualified and acting MAYOR, hereinafter called the CITY, and hereinafter called the CONSULTANT. WITNESSETH: That the CONSULTANT for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the CITY herein expressed, does hereby agree to furnish to the CITY professional services and materials, as follows: ARTICLE I - Scone of Work CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in Exhibit "A" entitled Proposal and attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. ARTICLE II - Costs The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or any part of the work performed under this Agreement at the rates and in the manner established in the attached Exhibit "A". Total expenditure made under this contract shall not exceed the sum of . Include all fees and expenses, consisting of all travel, incidental blue printing, photocopying and miscellaneous costs, estimated to be accrued during the life of the contract. Also, include any escalation or inflation factors anticipated. No increase in fees will be allowed during the life of the contract. Extension of the contract will be a basis for renegotiating the fee. Any increase in contract amount or scope shall be by express written amendment approved by the CITY and the CONSULTANT. ARTICLE III - Method of Payment The CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for costs incurred in the performance hereof as are allowable under the provisions of Part 1-14 of the Federal Procurement Regulations. CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed monthly in -arrears based upon the hourly services provided. CONSULTANT shall submit invoices in triplicate and addressed to the City of Hermosa Beach, c/o the Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3884. ARTICLE IV - Subcontracting . CONSULTANT shall not be permitted to subcontract any portion of this contract without the express written consent of the CITY. ARTICLE V - Completion Date It is anticipated that a real time frame for the scope items shall be achieved in days from the date hereof, however, the City's Director of Public Works may extend the completion date as required by the scope of this contract. Any contract time extension shall require the express written consent of the Director of Public Works. ARTICLE VI - Accounting Records CONSULTANT must maintain accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred which records and documents shall be kept available at the CONSULTANT's California office during the contract period and thereafter for three years from the date of final payment of Federal funds hereunder. ARTICLE VII - Ownership of Data All data, maps, photographs, and other material collected or prepared under the contract shall become the joint property of the CITY. ARTICLE VIII - Termination This contract may be terminated at any time for breach and the CITY may terminate unilaterally and without cause upon seven (7) days written notice to the CONSULTANT. All work performed pursuant to the contract and prior to the date of termination may be claimed for reimbursement. ARTICLE IX - Assignability CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer interest in this contract without the prior written consent of the CITY. 2 ARTICLE X - Amendment It is mutually understood and agreed that no alteration or variation of the terms of this contract, or any subcontract requiring the approval of the CITY, shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties hereto, and approved by all necessary parties. ARTICLE XI - Non -Solicitation Clause The CONSULTANT warrants that he has not employed or retained any company, or persons, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the State shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. ARTICLE XII - Equal Opportunity Assurance During the -performance of this contract, the CONSULTANT agrees as follows: A. The CONSULTANT will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, sex, creed, color or national origin. The CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, sex, creed, color or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoffs or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. B. The CONSULTANT will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, sex, creed, color or national origin. C. The CONSULTANT will permit access to his books, records and accounts by the applicant agency, the State, the Federal Highway Administration and/or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with this nondiscrimination clause. D. In the event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract, this contract may be canceled, terminated or suspended in whole or in part. ARTICLE XIII - Clenn Air Act During the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) as amended. ARTICLE XIV - State Compensation Laws A. In accordance with State Compensation Laws, the CONSULTANT shall carry Worker's Compensation insurance for all persons employed in the performance of services as set forth herein. The CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with a certificate verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the CITY before commencing services under this Agreement. Such policy shall require thirty (30) days notice to the CITY in writing prior to cancellation. In the event that legal action is commenced to enforce or declare the rights created under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of costs and reasonable attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the court. No member of the governing body of the CITY and no other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and the CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of CONSULTANT by CITY and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both CITY and CONSULTANT. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable Federal statutes and regulations as amended. The invalidity in whole or part of any provision of the Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable Federal statutes and regulations as amended. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF. HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT ATTEST: Elaine Doerfling City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Attachment 5 be/profagrl November 30, 1994: Our CCTV Inspection specs.are ready to be picked up here in the Public Works office, or we will mail them to you. There is no charge. Note: the bid is due 12/12/94. Jackie Jaques PSSI 8032 Westman Ave. Whittier, CA 90606 Richard Bartz PSSI 8032 Westman Ave. Whittier, CA 90606 Dennis Keene National Plant 1461 Harbor Ave. Long Beach, CA 90813 Bill Beaver Hoffman Southwest 23311 Madero Street Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Leroy Thomas Empire Cleaning 1539 West Orange Grove Unit B Orange, CA 92668 Greg Ray Video Inspection Service 4705 West Santa Ana Fresno, CA 93722 Jeff Jerome Speedflo 595 Encanada La Habra, CA 90631 (213)933-5446 (310) 699-5474 (310) 436-7600 (714) 380-4161 (714) 639-8352 - (209) 276-0186 (310) 691-1660 be/a/hb2 .. December 7, 1994 Y Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 PROPOSED ORDINANCE REGARDING DISPLAY OF BOOKS, MAGAZINES AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS Purpose: To provide Council with a proposed ordinance for consideration regarding the display of books, magazines and other publication Background: At the City Council meeting of October 11, 1994, when revising the standard C.U.P. conditions, the subject of display of certain publications was discussed. Under the prior C.U.P. conditions, these publications were to be placed out of view of minors. This condition only applied to stores that had a C.U.P.. This proposed ordinance is in response to City Council direction to develop an ordinance that regulates the display of the publications Citywide. Recommendation: To consider the proposed ordinance for introduction. Respectfully submitted: >5� Stephen R. Burrell City Manager . A. 12/06/94 13:27 WILLIAM a. BARR CHARLES S. VOSE CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER JAMCG 7urr MuiwHY LuWA:.0 W. LEE ROGER W. SPRINGER STEVEN B. OUINTANILLA MANY L. MCMASTER A(7TNUA J. MAZARACCDIAM JUDITH ROBERTS e21313212211 OB&V U002/006 LAW OFFICES OLIVER, BARR & VOSE A PiiOFCL.^.IOI�AL CCRPOAAT�ON TELEGOPIEH 12130 6211-2211 THE PARK '.'6- 60VTH FICucno!. LTRECT, GCCOND FLOOR L.QS ANGELES, CALIPOR.NIA 90012 121_. A2i•1'-An1 M F M n R A N D U M TO: Stephen Burrell, City Manager ty of Hermosa Beach FROM: arles S. Vose, City Attorney DATE: December 5, 1994 RE: Ordinance Regarding Display of Books, Magazines and other Publications. You have requested that I prepare an Ordinance regarding the display of magazines and other publicationo which are determined to be harmful to minors. Attached hereto is a draft ordinance which i5 consistent with California renal Code Section 313.1 regarding such types of displays for commercial The draft ordirianQft p,r4mic3�=ia del:initions and prohibits the display of harmful matters in businesses open to the general public with the following exc:epticr:e: 1) The placing of a device commonly known av cL "blinder rack" in front of the material, so that the lower two-thirds of the material is not exposed to view. 2) if the business prohibits the admittance of minors, except when accompanied by parent or guardian, by the placing of designated signs at each of the doors for admittance. It you have any questions, please feel free to call me. CSV:klm Attachment 248:0 1 ORDINANCE NO. 95- 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF. HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO CHAPTER 21, 3 OFFENSES -MISCELLANEOUS, A NEW SECTION 21-36, RELATING TO DISPLAY 4 OF BOORS, MAGAZINES AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS IN LOCATIONS OTHEF THAN NEWSRACKS. 5 6 WHEREAS, the .City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach 7 desires to adopt an ordinance regulating the display of books, 8 magazines and other publications in locations other thar, 9 newsracks; and, 10 WHEREAS, the City Council finds it in the best interest of 11 the public safety, health, and welfare of the City to regulate 12 the display of harmful matter which might be viewed by minors; 13 and, 14 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have clear and 15 unambiguous regulations regarding these activities, and therefore 16 sets forth the following regulations; and, 17 WHEREAS, California Penal Code Section 313.1(d) regarding 18 _distribution or exhibition of harmful matter to minor allows the 19 city to adopt an ordinance which restricts the display of 20 material which is harmful to minors, in a public place other than 21 a public place from which minors are excluded, by requiring the 22 placement of devices commonly known as blinder racks in front of 23 the material, so that the lower two-thirds of the material is not 24 exposed to view. 25 26 27 28 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 Ci 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMO BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application Chapter 21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Offenses -Miscellaneous is hereby amended by adding the following Inew section: "Section 21-36. Display of Books, Magazines and o Publications in Locations Other Than Newsracks. (a) Definitions. For the purpose of this section, following words and phrases shall have the meanings as ascr to them by this section: (1) "Matter" means any book, magazine, newspaper, video recording, or other printed or written material or any picture, drawing, photograph, motion picture, or other pictorial representation or any statue or other figure, or any recording, transcription, or mechanical, chemical, or electrical reproduction or any other articles, equipment, machines, or materials. (2) "Person" means any individual, partnership, firm, association, corporation, or other legal entity. (3) "Distribute" means to transfer possession of, whether with or without consideration. (4) "Knowingly" means being aware of the character of the matter. (5) "Exhibit" means to show. (6) "Minor" means any natural person under 18 years of age. Page 2 1 (7) "Harmful matter" means matter, taken as a whole, 2 which to the average person, applying contemporary 3 statewide standards, appeals to the prurient interest, 4 and is matter which, taken as a whole, depicts ox 5 describes in a patently offensive way sexual conduct 6 and which, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, 7 artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. 8 (b) Display of harmful matter. Every person who fox 9 commercial purposes, knowingly displays, distributes, exhibits by 10 any means, or causes to be displayed, distributed, exhibited by 11 any means, or offers to display, distribute, or exhibit by any 12 means, or permits to be displayed, distributed to exhibited by 13 any means, in any business, other than a public place from whict 14 minors are excluded, any harmful matter, shall be in violation of 15 this Section and shall be punished as specified in subsection (f) 16 below. 17 (c) Exceptions,to display of harmful matter. 18 (1) There shall be an exception to subsection (b) 19 above if there is placed upon the harmful material a 20 device commonly known as a "blinder rack" in front of 21 the material, so that the lower two-thirds of the 22 material is not exposed to view. 23 (2) There shall be an exception to subsection (b) 24 above if the business which displays harmful matters 25 prohibits admittance to the business by minors by the 26 placing of signs posted at each. of the doors normally 27 used or intended for use for public admittance whicr 28 shall read: Page 3 I '$Sexually explicit materials displayed here. Admissio 2 to minors is prohibited by law unless accompanied by 3 parent or guardian. Hermosa Beach Municipal Cod 4 Section 21-36(b)." The sign shall be not less than on 5 square foot in area and the letters shall be not les 6 than two inches in height. 7 The minor must be accompanied by an adult wh 8 represents himself or herself to be the parent o 9 guardian of the minor and whom the business person, b 10 the exercise of reasonable care, does not have reaso 11 to know is not the parent or guardian of the minor, o 12 that a minor who when not accompanied by a parent o 13 guardian, presented false documentation of being a 14 least eighteen years of age, when to the average an 15 reasonable prudent 'person such documentation woul 16 appear legitimate. 17 (d) Minor need not view or gain control of material. T 18 commit a violation of subsection (b) above, it is not require 19 that a minor have actually viewed or physically gained control o 20 any book, magazine, or other publication or matter as defined i 21 subsection (a) above. 22 (e) Business persons responsible. The provisions of thi 23 chapter, with respect to the display, causing to be displayed o 24 permitted to be displayed any book, magazine, or othe 25 publication as set forth in subsection (a) above, shall appl 26 only to persons having proprietary interests in or manageria 27 control of the ordinary and routine operation of the busines 28 Page 4 d. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 wherein and at which time there occurs a violation of any of the provisions of this section. (f) Punishment, prior convictions. Every person whc violates 21-36(b) is punishable by fine of not more than twc thousand dollars ($2,000.00), by imprisonment in the county jai] for not more than one year, or by both that fine anc imprisonment. However, if the person has been previously convicted of a violation of 21-36(b), the person shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison." Section 2. Severability The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction 'or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days afte its final passage and shall supersede any conflicting provisio of any City of Hermosa Beach ordinance. Section 4. Publication The City Clerk shall publish this Ordinance and th vote thereon, in the Easy Reader, a newspaper of genera circulation in the City of Hermosa Beach, prior to fifteen day after the date of its adoption. Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section S. certification The City Clerk shall certify to the passage an adoption of this Ordinance, make minutes of its passage an adoption in the records of the proceedings of the City Council a which the same was passed and adopted, and enter the same in the book of original Ordinances of the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED AND APPROVED on this 10th day of January, 1995. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor and President of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 ., AW December 7, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of December 13, 1994 FIRST NIGHT: UPDATE AND CONTRACT APPROVAL Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council: 1. Listen to a presentation from Arts Hermosa updating the Council on the event plans; 2. Approve the attached event contract; and 3. Consider whether or not to approve their request for a liability insurance reduction from $2 million to $1 million for the event. Background At the October 25, 1994 meeting, City Council approved the request from Arts Hermosa to conduct a First Night Event in the downtown area. At that time, Council requested that an operational update from staff prior to the event, outlining any significant changes from the original request. Analysis Since the last report, Arts Hermosa modified their initial street closure request, from Pier Avenue west of Valley Drive to Pier Avenue west of Manahattan Avenue. In order to address any cross-over traffic at Hermosa Avenue they have also requested closures on Hermosa Avenue from 10th to 14th Street. Obviously this reduced closure would present the City with fewer operational problems and would lessen the event's impact on City residents and parking. As proven with the Fiesta, this closure pattern does allow for reasonable access in the area and can be controlled with barricades and Police personnel. Arts Hermosa has expressed concern over the cost of providing $2 million in general liability coverage and have requested that this be reduced to $1 million. While $1 million had been the coverage required by the City for special events for many years, at the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission, in recent years (for professional volleyball tournaments etc.) Council has upheld a- $2 million policy requirement. The implementation of the $2 million level did not originate from a Risk Management analysis nor has the City had any difficulties with the $1 million level of coverage in many other events and facility leases, however, it is easy to argue the wisdom 12 of higher levels of coverage understanding the potential exposure public events can bring to the City. With that in mind, staff recommends approval of the attached event contract. The Arts Hermosa volunteers are to be congratulated for their efforts to date and for creating a community event that may be enjoyed for years to come. Fiscal Impact: $300 revenue to the general fund from the event fee. All direct costs (Police, Public Works) to be charged to Arts Hermosa. $5,000 expenditure from the Downtown Enhancement Fund (previously approved). Respectfiilly Submitted, Mary 9' R'o—e7Rey, Director Comnftmity Resources Concur: L" - Stephen urrell City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONTRACT WITH ARTS HERMOSA - This contract is entered into on December 13, 1994 at Hermosa Beach, California by and between ARTS HERMOSA, anon -profit organization and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regard to the "First Night" New Year's Eve Special Event on December 31, 1994. Event administration fee shall be: $300 Plus direct costs for Police, Public Works and Banner Fees. All predetermined fees shall be paid two weeks prior to Event. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Officers for the Event between the hours of 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. and the Chief of Police shall determine the number of officers necessary to ensure event safety and traffic control. All costs of the officers shall be assumed by Arts Hermosa. The streets shall be cleaned by Arts Hermosa to meet the conditions as specified by City staff. Arts Hermosa shall provide the City with a certificate of insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY its officers, employees, and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Arts Hermosa agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by negligent or wrongful act or omission of the event organizers or its agents, officers and employees, including but not limited to personal injury, bodily injury, death, and property damage. VERTISI The City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for the Event. The City shall waive the permit fee for the wall mural at Video Archives PARKING Arts Hermosa will provide free local transportation and/or provide adequate signs to direct participants to public parking areas. The CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested to be held as part of said event. The CITY shall have the right to deny any and all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall reserve Pier Avenue from Manhattan Avenue west to the Strand and Hermosa Avenue at 10th and 14th Streets from 3:00 p.m. December 31, 1994 to 2:00 a.m. January 1, 1995. At no time may the event block emergency vehicle access. CITY staff shall allow Arts Hermosa the opportunity to sell concession items per certain conditions. All concession items must be approved by the CITY prior to the event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION (S) OF SAID CONTRACT. *dC4►L�ilil,�3YZ�I►�y1If�I��l��r�I1:�i Arts Hermosa shall be responsible to provide adequate trash receptacles and portable toilets as necessary to accommodate the event. Arts Hermosa will be solely responsible for event management. Arts Hermosa will post temporary "No Parking" signs as required by the City. Arts Hermosa will abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by the City. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH City Attorney Mayor Assistant City Manager Arts Hermosa, Director' Date Date Date Date FirstMGHT®1995 Celebrate New Year's Eve in Hermosa BeachM Back Cafe 7 Manhattan Avenue No -Nos Avant Garb Video Archives Restyle Bijou Citibank HB Brewing Co N .� Pacific Screenprint Hermosa Ma1° Sports Ironworks Plaza a� a Coast Drug Loreto Plaza X Sponda CoffeeHouse Beach Drive Beach Drive The Strand/Pier/Ocean Event from 630 pm to 12:00 midnight X - Fir NIGHT Venues OX - Proposed Venues - Barricades/Street Cbsures -I Hermosa Avenue Brewworks Parking Permit Time Table Mail out Parking Permit Renewals* February 2, 1995 Advertise for over the counter sales Cable TV - Feb. 6th through 27th Local paper - February 10th Begin over the counter sales February 13, 1995 Grace period"` The grace period is given until all renewals postmarked by Feb. 28th have been processed, mailed and delivered. Parking citations issued Next Day .................................................................................................................. AL �,E��[ ti'E * Mail renewals earlier ** Set a standard grace period kvI /0-V / S-/ 9 V November 28, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 12, 1994 INFORMATION REPORT, PARKING PERMIT PROCESS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background: At the City Council meeting of April 12, 1994, the City Council requested that staff report back at a later time with information regarding the process for parking permits. The residential parking permit program runs from March 1 st through February 28th of each year. The permit enables residents to park at any yellow posted meter or restricted one hour parking area, within the Impacted Area, for up to 72 hours. There are two types of permits: a sticker that is issued and must be affixed to a currently registered vehicle; and a hanging tag permit which is transferable and can be used on any vehicle. Only one transferable permit is issued per year, per legal established dwelling which can be verified by the Building Department; owners of rental property may also purchase one guest permit for each unit owned. However, residents may purchase a sticker for each vehicle registered to them. Employees and business owners are entitled to purchase a sticker for their vehicle. All residents and businesses must be located within the impacted area to purchase a permit. The Impacted Area is defined as North and South City boundaries; by the Pacific Ocean on the West and Loma or Morningside Drive on the East. It also includes the 400 block of Second Street and the 200 block of Valley Drive. Within the Impacted Area is "Area 2" which covers the area between Palm Drive on the west, Loma/Morningside on the east, and the city boundaries on the north and south. This area is the one hour restricted parking which is only enforced May 15th through September 15th of each year. Analysis: ISSUANCE The permits are available to any resident or commercial enterprises who can provide the following documentation and meet the requirements: Proof of Residency (less than 30 days old) (a.) Residents - The following documents are accepted as proof of current residency: rental/lease agreement which bears their name and address, the date signed and the 13 4 signature of the owner; current utility bill; bank statement; credit card bill; a physician's statement. The proof must be postmarked within the past 30 days. Renewal forms are accepted as current proof of residency until April 1 st. After such date the above stated forms must be supplied. This process allows plenty of time for the citizens in the one hour restricted area, which is enforced only during the summer months, to purchase their permit. (b.) Employees - Employees within the Impacted Area must provide proof such as a pay stub or letter written on company letterhead. (c.) Rental property owners - Must provide proof of ownership such as a tax bill, a current rental property business license, or signed closing Escrow Papers. As a last resort, verification by the Building Department is required. Valid Vehicle Registration (a.) Personal Vehicle - The vehicle must be currently registered and bear the name of the person requesting the permit. (b.) Company Vehicles - If the resident is in possession of a company vehicle, a letter must be provided, on company letter -head, signed by a company official, authorizing the resident to have possession of the vehicle, in addition to the current registration. (c.) Leased Vehicles - If the resident is in possession of a leased vehicle, he must provide a copy of the lease agreement, leased in the same name as the resident, in addition with the current registration. (d.) Family Owned Vehicle - If the vehicle is registered to a parent or sibling, a letter authorizing them to have possession of the vehicle is required. This letter should be signed and dated by the registered owner. Picture /D This may be a Drivers license, California ID, Work ID, etc. This is not required on renewals processed through the mail since they are mailed back to the individual. Parking Citations Each license number is checked in the computer. As required by resolution, no permits may be issued until all outstanding parking violations on file are paid. Verification An issuance report by address is checked prior to issuance of a residential permit to assure that only one is issued per vehicle and legal dwelling. RENEWALS Preparation for renewals begin in December. During the past two years, renewal notices have been sent February 8th and February 3rd which allows the citizens at least three weeks to send in their renewals before they expire. Citizens are encouraged to purchase by mail to cut down on long lines at the counter. Renewals postmarked by February 28th, are guaranteed to be processed prior to the issuance of parking citations for expired permits. GRACE PERIOD A grace period is given until all renewals postmarked by February 28th have been processed, mailed and delivered. This guarantees that no one renewing by mail will receive a citation. The grace period on the issuance of citations is not advertised, however, most citizens coming into the office seem to be aware of it as this has been the practice of the City since the inception of the Parking Permit Program. New citizens to Hermosa Beach are pleased to receive any grace period given. To date, staff has received few complaints. Last year there was a two week grace period and the year before, a three week grace period. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Replacement Permits - If the resident changes vehicles or has the windshield replaced on the vehicle with the permit, a replacement sticker may be issued for a reduced fee of $3.00, provided that the original sticker and receipt are returned at the time of purchase. No replacement will be issued without the original sticker. Registration on a new vehicle must be provided at time of replacement. Proof of residency is required. If the transferable permit has been stolen, a new one may be issued at the regular price with a copy of the police report and proof of current residence. Agent purchasing for resident - If the resident is unable to mail or appear to purchase their permit they may have an agent purchase for them as long as the agent has the appropriate information. You must supply a copy of the residents identification. Respectfully Submitted: Marcia Hite, Citation Records Administrator Concur: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Steptjoh T Burrell, City Manager ' 12/07/94 10:51 '82136212211 City Council Meeting .,r Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council OB&V 002.015 STAFF REPORT December 13, 1994 Oil And Gas Lease No.2 Macpherson Oil's Request For Extension Of Time Pursuant To The Force Majeure Provision ISSUE # 1 Coastal Commission Permit Application Whether (1) the City's inability to ohfain a validly executed quitclaim deed from the Stinnetts, and/or (2) the City's failure to Complete an envlronmeritai assessment for the Project entitles the Lessee to an extension of time pursuant to the Force Majeure provision of the Lease? RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to deny the force majeure request relating to the Coastal Commission Permit application and direct the City Manager to prepare a resolution, accompanied by the requisite findings, as approved by the City Attorney's office, denying the force majeure request relating to the Coastal Permit application process on the ground that the Lessee has not demonstrated that the alleged actions of the City resulted in the Coastal Commission's deuisiun to terminate the processing of Lessee's Coastal Permit application. ISSUE # 2 Court Ruling Whether the written ruling of October 27, 1994 granting the petition for writ of mandate entitles the Lessee to an extension of time pursuant to the Force Majeure Provision of the Lease? RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to approve the force majeure request relating to the Superior Court's ruling of October 27, 1994 and direct the City Manager to prepare a resolution, accompanied by the requisite findings, as approved by the City Attorney's office, approving the force majeure request relating to the Superior Court's ruling of October 27, 1994 on the ground that it constitutes an enforced �1 12/07,,94 10:52 '$2136212211 OB&V I& 003%Of5 delay in that it is a result of "litigation challenging the validity of [the Lease] or any element thereof ...." The resolution shall also reflect that the subject enforced delay shall commence on October 27, 1994, leaving 347 days remaining on the Primary Term of the Lease. BACKGROUND primary Terra of Lease The Primary Term of the Lease is two years from the date of execution. Upon expiration of the Primary Term, the Lease expires on its own terms, and all parties to the lease are relieved from their obligations under the Lease. force Majeure PrOVI5100 Section 30 of the Lease provides for tin extension of time to perform where there are "delays or defaults due to... acts or failure to act of any other public or governmental agency or entity, including the City." Remaining Term of the Lease The Lease was executed on January 14, 1992. If there were no enforced delays, the Lease would have expired on January 14, 1994. All time granted for prior enforced delays expired on October 12, 1994. As of October 12, 1994, there were 362 days left on the Primary Term. This means that provided no further enforced delays are approved, the Lease will expire on October 9, 1995, DISCUSSION Issue >#1: Coastal Commission Permit Application The City has received a written Notification of Force Maieure from Donald R. Macpherson claiming that the Coastal Commission has ceased pru+cessing its Costal Permit application because: (1) the City has failed to deliver the project site free of the Stinnett Well, and (2) thee City has not yet completed the environmental assessment for the Project. If the above claims are accepted by the City Council as constituting the type of causes of delay covered by the Force Majeure provision of the Lease, the Lessee will be relieved from performing its obligations under the Lease until the above causes of delay are resolved, removed, or concluded. 12/07/94 1U:52 V.2.1 OB&V Stinnett Well -- Z, 004; 015 The Lessee 'argues that the City thas an obligation to deliver the entire City Maintendric:e Yard free from the Stinnett Lease. The Lessee cites Paragraph B of page 1 of the Lease which provides that the Lease permits the use of the entire City Maintenance Yard as the drill site. The Lessee further asserts that one of the requirements for obtaining the Coastal Permit is that there be a disposal well on the site, 7o satisfy this requirement, the Lessee plans to use the Stinnett Well. However, before the Stinnett Well can be converted into a disposal well, the Lessee must receive approval from the California Division of Oil & Gas. As a prerequisite for its approval, the Division of Oil & Gas will require the Lessee to prove that it has acquired the right from the City to utilize the well as a disposal well. In sum, the Lessee asserts that since the City has failed in its obligation to deliver the City Maintenance Yard free from the Stinnett Lease, as provided In Paragraph B of the Lease, it has been prevented from pursuing the Division of Oil & Gas approval to covert the Stinnett Well to a disposal well, which in turn has stalled the processing of the Lessee's Coastal Permit application. Environmental Assessment In addition to the Stinnett Well issue, the Lessee asserts that the City has failed to comply with Paragraph 13(b) of page 20 of the Lease which requires the City to conduct an environmental assessment of the City Maintenance Yard to determine the extent and nature of any contamination on the site within thirty days of the date of execution of the lease. According to the Lessee, such an assessment did not begin until September 29, 1994. The Lessee contends that one of the requirements for obtaining the Coastal Permit is that an environmental assessment of the City Maintenance Yard be conducted and that a remediatlon plan for any clean up he prepared. In sum, the Lessee asserts that since the City has failed in its obligation to complete an environmental assessment of the City Maintenance Yard, as set forth in the Lease, the Coastal Commission will not continue to process the Coastal Permit application. 12,'07.91 10:53 i V2136212211 Staff Analysis UB&V to OU5. 025 In the letter from Alison J. Dettmer to Don Macpherson, Jr., dated September 1, 1994, there is a list of 34 items that the Lessee has been directed to submit to the Coastal Commission before the' Coastal Permit application can be deemed complete. Without a complete application, the Coastal Commission cannot process the Lessee's application. According to Coastal Commission staff, the L033e$ has not yet submitted any of the requested items contained in the September 1, 1994 letter. There is no evidence indicating that the above two items are the Sola reasons why the Coastal Commission staff has been prevented from processing the Lessee's Coastal Permit application. Notwithstanding the above, if the Lessee is relating the City's failure to act to the Coastal Commission's refusal to process the Coastal Permit application, the Force Majeure notitication letter would be untimely since the Coastal Commission's determination of Incompleteness was made on September 1, 1994 and the Force Majeure letter was dated October 24, 1994. Section 30 of The Lease provides that an extension of time for an enforced delay "shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause [of the delayj, it notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty (30) days of commencement of the cause." Issue #2: Court Ruling The City has received a written Notification of Enforced Delay (Force Majeure) from Donald R. Macpherson claiming that the trial court's ruling of October 27, 1994 constitutes an enforced delay pursuant to the Force Majeure provision of the Lease. Staff Analysis Section 30 of the Lease provides that "litigation including litigation challenging the validity of [the Lease] or any element thereof" constitutes an enforced delay that entitles the Lessee to an extension of the two-year Primary Term. Upon approval of this enforced rielay, the Lessee will be relieved from performing its obligations under the Lease until such time the above ruling is reversed on appeal. If this delay is approved, the clock will stop the Primary Term commencing on the requested date of October 27, 1994, leaving 347 days remaining on the term of the Lease. 12-07/94 10:54 '$2136212211 1)B&V 006.015 EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Excerpts of Oil & Gas Lease No. 2 Exhibit B: Letter from Donald R. Macpherson to Stephen Burrell, dated October 24, 1994 (discussing the application of the force majeure clause of Oil and Gas Lease No. 2) Exhibit C.- Letter .Letter from Donald R. Macpherson to Stephen Burrell, dated November 11, 1894 (discussing the application of the force majeure clause of Oil and Gas Lease No. 2) Exhibit D., Letter from Alison J. Dettmer, California Coastal Commission, to Don Macpherson, Jr., dated September 1, 1994 (discussing incompleteness of coastal permit application) Exhibit E: Ruling on Matter Taken Under Submission September 20, 1994, dated October 27, 1994 Exhibit F.- Executed :Executed Quitclaim Deeds From Roy L. and Rosemarie Stinnett to City of Herfnusa Beach Respectfully Submitted Stephen Burrell City Manager %even B. Quintan Pia Deputy City Attor ey the reasonable use by the Lessee of the surface for Lease operations if surface use is allowed by the terms of this Lease. Any such easements or encumbrances on -the Drill Site shall not unreasonably interfere with the operations of the Lessee. 28. BANKRUPTCY If at any time a filing is made by or against the Lessee under the bankruptcy laws of the United States, the City shall have the right to take any action consistent with the bankruptcy laws to protect its interests in this Lease. 29. FAILURE TO ENFORCE The failure of either party to enforce any provision of this Lease, which includes the exhibits, shall not constitute a waiver by either party of that or any other provision or of any subsequent breach by the either party. 30. ENFORCED DELAY: EXTENSION OF TIME TO PERFORM Notwithstanding specific provisions of this Lease, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default where delays or defaults are due to war; insurrection; strikes; lock -outs; labor disputes; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; action of the elements; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes; lack of transportation; governmental' restrictions or priority; litigation including litigation challenging the validity of this transaction or any element thereof; unusually severe weather; inability to secure necessary labor, materials or tools; acts of the other party; acts or failure to act of any other public or governmental agency or entity including the City; or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the party claiming an extension of time to perform. An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty (30) days of the commencement of the cause. Times of performance under this Lease may also be extended in writing by the City and the Lessee. 31. APPLICABLE LAW AND LEGAL ACTIONS a. This Lease shall be interpreted and construed under the laws of the State of California. b. GLG Energy, L.P., which together with Windward Associates comprises the Lessee, hereby agrees to submit to California jurisdiction. In the event that any legal action is commenced by City against the Lessee, service of process on the 1031.08 {11/1/91} 35. EXHIBIT "A" O 1 L C O M P A N Y 2716 OCEAN PARK BOULEVARD. SUITE 3080 SANTA MONICA. CALIFORNIA 90405 TEL 310 452 3880 FAX 310 452 0058 October 24, 1994 Mr. Stephen R. Burrell City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Re: Windward/Oil & Gas Lease No. 2 Notification of Force Majeure Dear Steve: RECEIVED OCT 2 5 1994 CITY VGR. OFFICE Reference is made to Paragraph 30 of the Oil and Gas Lease No. 2 (the "Lease") between the City of Hermosa Beach and Windward Associates, et al., Lessees (the Lessees). Said paragraph states that performance by either party to the Lease shall not be deemed to be in default where the delay or defaults are the consequence of various defined conditions including "acts or failure to act of any ... public or governmental agency or entity including the City or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the party claiming the extension of time of performance." The Lessees have filed an application for a permit to the California Coastal Commission for - the Coastal Development Permit which is a required permit before drilling may be commenced. One of the requirements for the permit is an adequate disposal system for formation water. In support of our application we have informed the Commission that the Stinnett well on the drill site would be used for this purpose. To convert the Stinnett Well to a disposal well requires theapprovalof the California Division of Oil & Gas and such approval may involve a public hearing. The Lessees cannot apply to the Division of Oil & Gas until they can prove ownership and that they have acquired the right from the Owner to so utilize the well. Under the Oil & Gas Lease, it is the obligation of the City to deliver the drill site free of the Stinnett Well.. "B. Said Uplands Lease provided for the use of the existing City Maintenance Yard (more specifically described in said Uplands Lease, excepting existing structures, both above and below ground, which would remain available for City use including ingress and egress) as the drill site." (Lease, Paragraph B, page 1) The Stinnett Well in its present condition must be abandoned in order that the drill site is made available under the provisions aforequoted. In order to relieve the City of that expense EXHIBIT "B" Mr. Stephen R. Burrell October 24, 1994 Page 2. the Lessees have agreed with the City, contingent on the receipt of all required drilling permits, to relieve the City of its obligation to abandon the Stinnett Well in return for the use of the well as a disposal well. Until the City gains title to the Stinnett Well, the well can neither be abandoned or converted to a disposal well. A further contingency has developed with reference to the application pending before the Coastal Commission. One of the requirements for a permit is an environmental assessment of the drill site and the submittal of a remediation plan for any clean up that may be required as determined by the environmental assessment. The first sentence of Paragraph 13(b), page 20, of the Lease reads: "b. Within thirty (30) days of the execution of this Lease by all parties hereto, the City shall cause an environmental assessment of the Drill Site to be made to determine the extent and nature of contamination, if any, on the Drill Site." While the Lease requires the environmental assessment to be started within 30 days of the execution of the Lease, such assessment was not started until the 29th day of September 1994 and the assessment phase is not being made. The purpose of this letter is to notify the City that until the City is able to acquire title to the Stinnett Well, and until the environmental assessment has been completed, together with the submittal of a remediation plan for any clean up that may be required, the Lessees cannot proceed with the application with the Coastal Commission, and for that reason the Lessees shall not be deemed in default under the provisions of the Force Majeure clause (Section 30 of Oil & Gas Lease No. 2) Your acknowledgment of the receipt of this notice will be appreciated. Very truly yours, MACPHERSON OIL COMPANY By: .�-� Donald R. acpherson On Behalf of the Lessees DRM/chd cc: Donald R. Macpherson Jr. Scott Macpherson Larry Morton 0 1 L C O M P A N Y 2716 OCEAN PARK BOULEVARD. SUITE 3080 SANTA MONICA. CALIFORNIA 90405 TEL 310 452 3880 FAX 310 452 0058 November 11, 1994 Mr. Stephen R. Burrell City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254-3885 Re: Oil and Gas Lease No. 2 ("Tidelands Lease") January 14, 1992 Notification of Enforced Delay (Force Majeure) Dear Mr. Burrell: RECEIVED NOV 6 1994 CITY OFFICE This is to provide the City of Hermosa Beach the notice prescribed under Section 30 of the referenced lease (the "Lease") of the existence of conditions such that performance otherwise required of the lessee under the Lease "shall not be deemed to be in default." More specifically, the lessee will not be able to commence operations for the drilling of a well for oil or gas under the Lease within the period of two (2) years after the Lease date (as -prescribed in Section 1(c) of the Lease, and as extended by prior and/or continuing force majeure conditions of which the City has previously been notified), due to the further matters of force majeure described below. Section 30 of the Lease, in making provision for "Enforced Delay; Extension of Time to Perform," provides in pertinent part as follows: "Notwithstanding specific provisions of this Lease, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default where delays or defaults are due to..... governmental restrictions or priority;... acts of the other party; acts or failure to act of any other public or governmental agency or entity including the City; or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the party claiming an extension of time to perform." The specific further matters of force majeure which are the subject of this letter are as follows: EXHIBIT "C" Mr. Stephen R. Burrell November 11, 1994 Page 2. In September of 1993, the Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition filed suit in the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles seeking a writ of mandate ordering the City to set aside its May 1990 certification of the project EIR, as well as its August 1993 approval of the Project CUP and an Addendum to that EIR, on the grounds of (a) alleged failure(s) to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act in a number of respects, (b) alleged violation(s) of the City's zoning code and ordinances, and (c) alleged violations(s) of the (Uniform) Fire Code, as adopted by the City. The natter was brief, .argued and, on Septetubef 20, 1994, takeri under submission by the Court for decision. In a written ruling of October 27, 1994, the Court has granted the petition for writ of mandate, and has directed that the writ issue ordering the City to set aside its approvals of the Project on the basis of the Court's determination that the "Project Site" approved by the City exceeds one acre in size, and that this is in violation of §21-10 of the City's Municipal Code. Although no such action is required under the Lease to give effect to this notice, I would appreciate your confirming receipt of this letter and of the existence of the force majeure conditions described above. Of course, if you have any questions concerning the foregoing, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Very truly yours, MACPHERSON OIL COMPANY Donald R. Macpherson v� Chairman & CEO DRM/chd _12%07%9.1_ 10:54 NOV 22 '94 11:20AM CA CORDIAL L' '$'2136212211 OB&V Zi 007/015 PM wpb OK GQVWQr STATE OF MF0RN1A-7H1kJ=UJ1a$ AGENCY _ CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION is ra ma4 aura soon Lq4 FRAN=. U t410'J•"19 -- V= AND Iva N 1311W-& oD September 1. 1994 Don Macpherson, Jr. Macphorsaia O11 Coatpaay 2716 Ocean Park Blvd., Suite #3080 Santa Monica, California 94405 Larry Morton Stocker Resources. Inc_ SW 5wrth Fairfax Avenue Los AhSales, Callfotrtia 90056 Re: Coutal development permit application E-94-11 far oil and gas exploration and development at an urban driHdtP in the City of Hermosa Beach , Deaf Mr. Macpherson and Mr. Morton: As I informed Mr. Macpherson in our phone conversation on August 31, 1994, staff of rhe Coastal Comfnissior.'s Energy & Ocm Resources Utlit has reviewed your coastal development pc mlt ("CDp ,) application submittals of August 8, 1994 and determined that 244%1101121 information must still be provided to evaluate properly the proposed project under the stanUT& of the California Coastal Act. The CDp apphcafaon thardore remains incomplete and cannot be filed. As we informed you in our letter of December 2,1943, it has been the Coastal COMr11issiam's historic practice to reviow the oil cmd gas exploradon Phase segarathly and in advance of the: oil and gas production phase. Results of the exploration phase, can then be used by the applicant and Commission staff to assess specifically the potential% environmental irmpacts of a possx'bie 35-y� project We thus advised you to modify your project description Snfor ihde only � xplaration exPlOmtioo phase of the project! The informadon we would,need to file an application phase only is more limited than'the production phase and thercfm could be processed in a more timely fashion. However, since you intend to proceed with an application for both the explorationitestigg and production phssce, the Commission must conduct a much mote Wdesuft and comprehensive evaluation of all the potential adverse envirotunental effects of a possible 30- 35 year project under the applicable standards of the Coastal Act. The addidoaal iri'omadon we mquiee is desaibed below: General Informtatium (1) As a party to 'Oil and Gas Luse rfo.'2" with the City of Hermosa Beach. Mrupherson 411 Company is identified as a gneral per of Windward Associates. ThO signa epartner ture page attached to Macpherson Oil Company's CDP application should therefore be re-signed EXHIBIT "D" _ 12/07/94 10:55 '82188212211 OB&1' NOY 22 194 11-.2zAM CA COASTAL COMM L atter to non Macphersori and Lim Mc don September 1.1994 Page 2 and re -submitted w rcpact Macpherson Oil Company's status as a general partner in Windward Associates. l�008�U1'S (2) in the now CDP application submitted to the Coastal Commission on August 8;1994. Stocker Resources Inc. joined Macpherson tail Company as a co -applicant" l?leasa submit evidence that Oil and Gns Lcasa No. 2 Between the City of Memo= Beach and `ilrittdward Associates" has ban assigned to Stocker Res mes be.. Project Deserip*M (3) The CDP application and the SIR Stara that the applicants plan to produce up to 600 bbls/day during Phase I. However, the applioaats' ail SPi11 Contingency Plan and Field Manual state that Phase i of the proposed project win produce up to 400 bblslday. Please cha* proposed phase I production volumes - (4) 00=4 Condition #12 of CUP 93-5632 requires that all wens be drilled and completed within SS months (approximately 4.5 years) of the start of drilling of the first exploratory well. Do Macpherson ail $Ad StOdOr RCaauma intend to prodtaoe oil from the explormory wells during phase IY's Conswction period or will AH production be shutrin? Please identify the number of barrels that the epplicattis intend to transport by avcic before pipel'wcs arc contracted and fully operatiorw. Eased on this figure, what is the gMuimum number of uuck traps proposed to transport oil to its refinery destination? (3) Please submit detailed project plans for the proposed construction of The two 2400' oil MW g" pipeU= Plaase submit documentation of liquefaction potential along the proposed pipeline corridor. (6) Af(Sr all wells are drilled, the derrick is to be rcplared with pumping units. Hew high are the pumping units? What kind of pumping units are proposed? (7) Tho appl cation states that a �vorkover rig as high as 110 feet may be used Site For as much as 90 days per year. Will the workaver rig ado be sutrouaded by sound atienuatibn panels? What measures do tote applicants propose to implement to mitigate or Minimize the effaces of the workover rig on the surrounding community? on spilk on August 8, 1994, Macpherson Oil and Stocker Resources submiVed an Oil Spill Contingency Plan and Field Manual, as requested by Commission staff in its December 2. 1993 and Marsh 23, 19941atters. Revisions to these plgns and additional inforrtadon must still be provided to enable the Commission star to evaluate the project under section 30232 of the Coastal ACL Section 30232 specifically requires that an applicant demonstrate that (1) protection against the spillage, of crude oil, gas, petroleum products, or hazardous substances be provided: and (2) effective 12/Oi%94 10:55 8'21362 '122'11 UB&�', 9009/015 _ _ —. — P.4/17 NOV 22 '94 1I;eIKn cR COASTAL COMM Letter [o Don Macpherson and Leery Morton Septeratter 1,1994 Page 3 containment and cleanup facilities and procedures be providts l for accidentsl spills that do occur - Our additional oil spill information needs are as fallows: Facility 1�IIpri4n (g) 'liar applicants' contingency plant is limited to an Analysis of potentia] spills at the droL to only. The contir germy plan fails to address the risk of. and resulting impacts of, an ail spill from tho proposod phase II r-Linch diameter oil pipeline. The plan's description of the ftoiay and oil spill analysis mast therefore be revised to include the 2500400t oil pipeline along Valley Dave. The plan should Wendy all possible spill scenarios caused by a leak or rupture of the pipeline. The plan should also incorporate tha powntid for a spill from A tank truck used during Phase 1. r (9) The first test of section 30232 requires the applicant to demonstrate how the proposed project will be designed to prevent an oil spin from occurring. Tho contingcaey pica's Aiscussion of prevention measures is fragmented and incotnpkle, The plan tines not provide adequate inforinadon on how the proposed facilities will be designed to prevent an oil spill. The plats Instead emphasizes containment facilities that will hold the oil after a SPM has already occurred. Sections 3.1 and 3.2. refertaced in the contingency play's Ta014 of COUIOnts as preveation measures, do not addrW6 preventiaa HE all (these section instead address "Spill history" "off-site co�segtumcc analysis"). Therefor, the contingency plan should be modifiied Bid to include a thorough discussion of prnevcution raeas>:ras thu includes, bac is not necessarily limited to, a description of (1) the frequency and tlrpcs of inspections; t2) the hvquaticy and type of oeeVenuve mdntenance prograrus; (3) system dmigas (Le. leak dowc-tion, internal and extemal c0rr0si0n controls. Computerized automaic shutdown gstert]S, fail-safe alarm cyst= sid secondary containment systems): and (4) pcmo=d training and other procedures (Le. alcoholldrug awareness and hypothetical drills). (14) Commission staff mquesmcd is its letters of December 2. 1993 and Mlarrh 23, 1994 that a "worst case" and •'m=nabie worst case" oil spill analysis be. provided- The contingatcy plan does not at all address a "worst case, oil spill accnatio. "a "worst rue" spill andyris should address a total system failure. For example, if a major bmach in the pipeline ooewes, how fact can the pipeline be shutdown? Once the system is shutoff, what U the LoLuincludes volumedes ri tion of il tho6t the dethodologies and catncvlatiow IiWA to determine tsis he that Includes a crap 1p proposed facility's'Nvorst case" spill. 12/07/94 10:56 'i;3`2136212211 NOV 22 '94 11:21nm CR CCASTAL CGMM OU V Z 010 %01`5 r•.Z?11ir Letter to Dnn Macpherson W harry Morton Wember 1. 1994 Page 4 (11) After the "worst case" spill scenario is defined and substantiated, please dr-wribe specifically ail factors or special circumstances relevsnt to this project (e.g. Masons why the pipeline slight not drain Total cont=% airy.) that the appli=ts balieve will midgets or minimize a `,worst case, spill from occurring. Based on this analysis, what do the applicants propose to be a "reasonable worst case" spilt scenario? (12) Identify which of the following fcdeml/statr agencies will conduct an oil spill contingenncY plan tt=view for this project U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Znviro&aonW Protection Aganay, US. Depanment of Transportation, Minerals Manigement Servioa, and/or the State of California Depararrient of Fish and Game's Office of Oil Spial Prevention and Respostse. with rrspoct to those agencies which have jurisdiction over this project, please provide a -worst case," "rmonable worst rase,.' and/or "maxilnurn mosi probable spill" analysis pursuant to those agencies' requirtnnents and dcriradons. is wguested abom please also provide the methodologies and calculations used to derive the number(s). (13) In a phone conversation on August 22 1994, David OautschY indicated than the qb Footprint Analysis of Proposed Hcrmosa Brach Oil and Gas Development Project." prepared by'l=e-Chambers Systems Consultants. Ina, scrns as the "Rule and flazard Analysis" required by the Office of Oil Spit Prevention and pegponse's contingency platy regulations. (14. CCR section 817.02) In pan. these tegttlations requite that a hazard and risk analysis include: (a) an analysis of the poicnt al ori discharges, including the size. frequency, cause. duration and location of all significant spills from the facility as 8 result of each major type of hua +d identified; (b) control measures that will be used to mlliga= or a minaw the: bwa ds identified; (c) a prediction of the potential otZ spills that might still be expected to Occur after any mitigating controls have been implemented; (d) all supporting documentation used m develop the risk and hazed analysis, and (e) a trajectory "Ysis, of series of t mjectories, to determine the potential direction, rate of 'flow and time of travel of the reasonable worst case oil spill from the facility to marine •cause and to the shorelines that may be impacted. (14 CCR section 817.02(c)(1)-(3)) The hazard footprint analysis prcpiared by Pmt.- Chnmbars does not, however, satisfy these standards. Please prepare and submit a "Risk and Hazard Analysis" pursuant to these regulations. [_nntaintnenI attd_�leanlltz (la) The second test of section 30232 requires that effective containment and cleanup procedures and Facilities be provided for accidental spills that do occur. Tho contingency Vibe eottdns ency plan submitted on August R. 1994 defims the "reasonable worst case spill" as 10 barrels. Na analysis or calculatione or the "ntasonable wore cage ail spill" was Drovi" however. 11e CamMusion ataif believes that when the oeattingeacy plan is revised to include the PrOP=d oil pipeline as a Part or" onshore Witty. rhe "worst Gass" sac/'Wwnsble worst case" spill scenarios and arilysis will Ch Oge. 12107"'94 ,10:57 '82136212211 OB&V O11i015 NOV 22 '94 11 s 22AM CA COASTAL. CCMM ixaer to Don Macpherson and Lanz► Manton September 1. 1994 Page 5 pian outlines Phase II specifications for ft wcA crllars, W and vessel containments. perimeter walls and berm but does not,offer any explanation or demonstration that these dimensions will provide -adequate containment for the storage and throughput volunm of Please' 11. Further, the plan does not pxov:de a Map and description of the rm sand collection system (that will consist of collection basins, underground ' interceptors and filters) that is a part of Ph&= EL (15) Figure 3-1 is supposed to show the potential area of Hermosa Beach`s shorclinc that i9 expected to be impacted by a "reasonable worst case oil spill" that reaches the ocean outfall. Figure 3-1 is actually just a protect location map. Figure 3-1 should clearly depict 0a ocean outrall and the trajectory of un in the evput of an oil spill reaching the ocean, (16) Page 5-1 of the contingency plan says the applicants will cono8*~t-with Advance' Cleanup Te'chnologie's, Inc. C ACTM for shoreline cleanup only. Please cl*arify if ACTT will provide boar on -water containment and recovery and shoreline cleanup. Will ACTT also be called upon to respond to a spial at the proposed facility? The cantingeacy plan should therefore be revised to identify clearly who will conduct onshore and oar -water spill iesponw. Please also provide the number of AC n personnel and describe rich level of training. What is the maximum size spill that AM is capable of handling given its cturent inventory of equipment and pen nnel? (11) The contingcncy pian should also be revised to include an inventory of ACiZ's and the onshore responder's array of spill contai=ent and e:eaaup agaipment- Please demonstmm also that the inventory of equipment is sufficient to contain and cleanup the ` masonable worst case oil spill." Does the proposed oil spill responder maintain stud I boats and other equipment sufficient to mspond to a "reasonable worst c&%d' earshot* shallow water spill? The contingency plan stater that ACTT can reach the spill site Within 2-3 hours. Please describe the array of personnell and egaipmont that AM can provide wirbin that 2.3 hour timeframe. (18) Ido the app!"'cants propose to store and maintain any spill containment and cleanup equipment (i.e. nand bags, sorbent pads, etc.) ou site? (19) The plan says that the operators "will contract+' with an oil spill response contractor. When do the applicants intend to contract with an oil spill tesponder(s)? (20) Page 4-1 of the convergency plan stares that measures will be taken to prevent oil from reaching the offsite Storm drains or to block the storm drain if one did occur. Define specifically what these measures will be'. (21) U spWod oil reaches a storm drain, how fast could the oil to reach the water assuming worst case conditions? 12/07/94 10:57 V2136212211 Nps/ 22 -94 11 a ?2pM CA COASTAL. CCMM Later jo Don Msaphasen and LWY Morton September 1. 1994 Pug; 6 - OBU Z 012 013 I .f1ir (22) spilled oil rcaches the octan, when✓ will the swaging area be for a spill response and clemup efforts? OU Transporta9kn (23) The applicants propose w transport all oil during Phase 11 10 the El Segundo Rofi,nerY through Cherton-ow►red and -operated pipelines. The application states that the produced ail will be shipped to the idle Radiant !leach Pipeline System owned by Chevron which was takes out of service in 1984. To rzacdvatc the system, Chevron must fn$UU new swao Is of pipeline- It is our understanding that the Radiant Beach PipeUae SYS= come= to Chcvroa's Wilmington -Torrance Pipe1ine which can transport oil to the El Segue Reftery. please submit a map illustrating the locadon of the Radiant Bah pipeline System and its tie-in to the Wilmington-Torra:x:e Pipeline- Will a cortistai development permit be required for any construction activity needed to inactivate the Radiant Beach Pipeline System? CheN=,s letter of July 29,1994 also suggests that the Wilmington -Torrance Pipes to may change service in the future, It this is the" I an entirely ne pzp Y be conmeled to transpolt )" =osa Beach oil. How will Hertaosa Beach oil be transported to its refinery destination by pipeline if the Wilmington -Torrance pipeline changes idea? Will a new p1poline connection ba constructed hd= the Wilmington' Torrance Pipeline changes service? F AW& (24) The -Hazard Footprint Analysis of proposed iiermosa Beach Oil and Gas Development project" fails to include a Phase iI oil and gas pipeline and a Phase I mak troch (carrying oil) accident as part of its ,Design Basis,.Uridents:' The analysis should therefore bo revmd to incorporate the oil tianspormtinn components of Phases I and II of the proposed project. (25) The report states that the gas is not expected to contain any hydrogen sulilde. If, in fact hydrogen sulfide is present in the gas, ac what concentrarions could a toxic gas cloud be formed in the evont of an accident? (25) "the report states on page 4 that "to be eoaservative, we have assurned d at the etude is fairly light. " please define "fairly light.'• (27) The report states that the probability of a "blowout during drilling is insignirIcant. If a blowout were to occur, what would be'sesults of the ha=d footprint analysis with respect to radiant hen flammable gas, blast overpressure and flying debris? Would such a blowout accident extend the hazard footprint? lY, U7/94 10:58 '$213121.2211 'r OB&V [�j013/015 NOV 22 '94 11 a 23AM CA COASTF4.. COMM P. FIVi r Lett= to Mn Macpherson and Larry Moron September 1. 1994 Page 7 (2S) Are there instances where iaerr gas systems fsil, thus resulting in the possibility of a tank explosion? The report, also stares that the potential for an explosion of a FWKO vessel or heater treater is "extremely unlikely" because k-wKO vessels and hmw ueaxa's are ASW certified pressm vessels_ Again, it seems there is rhe potential for such vessels to fail. If such a vessel accident did occur, would the release be worse than a release from a 2 -itch diameter hole? (29) The "Geotechnical Report on Subsurface production Zones: prepared by Paul Hacl or. ' includes four contour maps showing the areal axteat of the four principle zones, Using these reaps, please add a delineation well to illustrate the proposed direction and extent of the wen into the producing horizons, H4mg2n SuWd�Cs_as (30) During Phase Y operations, the presestce of hydrogen sulfide gas is to be Monitored - 'Please describe how the gas will be monitored for hydrogen sulfide. Who will conches tate gas monitoring? How often will the gas s=am be rested for hydrogen sulfide? The application states that monitoring will be conducted during drilling operations and "periodically thereafter." Please define ,periodically dmeafmr.". Please describe specifically when and what hydrogen sulfide gent vessels will be installed at the project sin, if needed. (31) As requested in the Commission staff's letters of December 2,1993, and March 23. 1994o a soil atralysis describing the nature and extent of soil andlor ground wgter corztaminadon at the project site and a detailed remediation plaza, if needed, must be submitted before the application can be deemed eomplem (37) The application states that constant monitoring of the Wilmington-Torrance-Redoodo area by a specially !n$talIed seismic monitoring system for over 11 years shows no cmict of oil operations on seismic activity. (page 001956) Who conducts the seismic monitoring operations? Please describe also how the seismic monitoring progrAm warts. The Iuly 1994 opinion writtrtt by Merrill Wright on the potential for fluid injection induced seismicity associated with the proposed oil and gas project at Hermosa Hach moommands that the operators establish an "annual seismic data review:' Ibe Purpose of the review would be to acgmm seismic information ft= the area in and around the proposed oil field to nssess the possibility of fluid injection -related seismic events. Please describe specifically how the applicants propose to monitor for induced seismicity. 12/07/94 10:59 X2136212211 OB&V f�1014.01� NOV ZZ '94 11:nRM CR COASTAL COMM _ LAW to Don Macpherson and LAM Merton September 1,1994 Page 9 Subsidence Co,nerel Plan (33) The operational plan for tic Hermosa Beach oil Project propose c to set up a subsidence monitoring program. The "Subsidence Monitoring gild Control Plan." prepared by Lzonard W. Brock; states that `ia]ny evidence of subsidence attributable to oil operations will be, immadiaraly followed by water injection," -The basic monitoring Plan consist; of setting up a benchmark network covering the land area and pier above the prospective oil trservoirs, The network is to ba wu bUshzd prior w oil production and will be surveyed on an annual basis thereafter. Please defmle "any evidence of subsidence," Please deme exactly the level of subsidence evidence required before a water ir'*Tion program will be initiated For eatample, if only one benchmark registers 1/2 inch subsidence but the other benchmarks show no evidence of subsidence' will the operators still implement immediately a Wates injection program under this proposal? How will evidence of subsidence "attributable to ail operations" be determined? Who will compile and interpret the results of the annual monitaring program? If evidence of subsidence caused by oil opei$tions is found, will the operators or the Deparunent Vf Oil and Gas prepare a water injection progeria? How quickly can a water injection program be implemented once discovery of subsidence is found? How quickly cart the subsidence be halted after a water injection program is initiatedl please also describe which local. State and/or federal agencigs will monitor water injection for the Most of mitigating subs►dencc- Alternatives Analysis (34) In its letters of December 2,1993, and Manch 23f 1994, Commission staff requested an evaluadon of the feasibility of the abandoned drilisite in Radiant Beach, and any other alternadve situs considered by the City of Hermosa Beach or the applicants. The application states that in addition to the City Yard Maintenance and School Yard sites, the abandoned Redondo Beach drinsite. and a potential atcrr Wve site in the rnamad right-Of- way ightof- way at Hemndo Street were evaluated. From a technical standpoint, the applicanrs maintain that only 37% of the productive Brea of Hermosa Beach rmor zs could be dovolopod at die aitemative Redondo Reach site. The applicants further maintain that only 69% of the volume of oil that could be developed from the proposed Gary Maintenance Yard site could be produced at the Herondo Street railroad right-of-way. Please submit a map of she two alternative dtillsite lacations. FICuso ailso Provide the applicants' gcotechnical analysis and calcvladons to substanti&w that only 37% and 69* of the total volume of available mvs roes can be developed, respectively, at the Redondo Beach and Herondo Street altunWivc sites. Using cross-sectional reaps similar to those contained in Paul Hacker's geoteihnical report for the Maintenance Yard Site, pl&e illustrate how far the wells cart reach from each alteraadvO site. Pleava identify all factors that limit access to the full oil reservoir from these sites. 12/07/94 10:58 %'2136212211, NOV 22 '94 11 c 24RI•I CR COA5TRL: Con"' n Letter to Don Macpherson and IVry Morton September 1. 1994 Page 9 ow, [ 015/015 f P. 10/17 The applicants have cucicludcd that to sacriftoo 37-G% of the potential recovery of oil and gas does not meet the projects objactiv0 (to economically dclll Hermosa Beach's anshom and offshore oil'reserves) and therefore the alte=dvo sites iafc& ible. Please substantiate why the inability to recover 37% and 6,?% of Etta oil wee ver malas the project film.-IcaaIly infeasible. What i,5 the finer W impact of the alleged reductions in rhe oil recovory rate? in addition, the EIRR identifies the City of hlerrnoaa Beazh School Yard as a potential slw=tive site for the proposed 30 well project, Tho EI R does not, however, provide any aWysis of the impacts or feasibility of this alt"113dve. Th s, pitze describe spedawny the reasons why the School Yazd site. was dismissed as it preferred alternative to this project Can The fun msemir be accessed from the School Yard? Why is the Maintenance Yard site preferable to Erie School Yard site. please note also that since t< now CDP application was submitted in August 1994 with Macpherson Oil and Stacker Resources as caapplicants, we have given the application a new ttttmber. E-9411. I will be out of d* office or. vacation during September 2.10. Should you have any questions during my absence &bout tha contGrIts of this letter or the meeting en September 15, please can Chris Perry, Deputy Man&$er of the Energy & Ocesa Rezourws Unit, at (415) 904-5245. We look forward to meeting with you on Sepzcmber 15. At that time, we can discuss further tht contents of this laxer cad the Commission's CDP applicadcn. praxes in general. Sincerely, Vag;,., Alison J. Detum Coastal Program Analyst EMgy & 0cm Resources Unit cc. David Gautschy. David E. Gauuchy, Inc. ad1221ds�ur�1� •l SUPERIOR couRT OF CALIFORNIA , COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES' Date: October 27.1994 H000rabk DIANE WAYNE . Judp LNRONE .. "TTREWS-DOTY . DgwV Clerk /a NONE , Deputy Sheriff . E.R.M. M25250 (panics and Counsel checked if prewtu) HERMOSA BEACH STOP OIL COALITION, ETC . , ET AL Counsel For - plaintiff vs no appearances Counsel For THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ETC., Defendant ET AL NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Statutory construction is not required, when the language is clear and unambiguous. ;.d. at 166. However, the plain meaning may be disregarded "to avoid absurd results or to give effect to manifest purposes that, in light of the statute's legislative history, appear from its provisions considered as a whole." City of Las Anse es v Los Oliyos Mobile Home Park (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 1427, 1433. Moreover, the court must avoid a statutory construction which renders language surplusage. Malibu committee for. -Incorporation v Boar of ,Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 397, 403 (citing BrQwn v. Superior Court (1984),37 Cal.3d 477, 484) . In the instant proceeding, the language contained in Municipal Code §g 21-10(a) and 21-10(b) is clear. The two ordinances approved the acquisition of the city maintenance yard -and the former South School site. Each ordinance provided an exception to the general prohibition against oil and gas development so long as each respective site did not exceed 1 acre. Furthermore, in 5/90, the City passed an ordinance which amended the zoning code to permit oil and gas development and related facilities only in areas approved by voters. AR 1831-1833. Neither authorizes to; permit section 22-10(a) nor Section 21-10(b) contains any languagc the city, not the voters, to consolidate the 2 sites in order a" site over 1 acre. I. piolation of CEQA. court need not specifically address the alleged CEQA violation the underlying project itself is invalid. i /The b�cause PAGE 2 OF 3 Dept. 96 l .Am FAB -11* Oaobw 27. 1 EXHIBIT "E" i_ i —:1-17. . •r lip_ r.CHL I i :tri : i' CZ - SUFERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA , COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Due: October 27, 1994 Honorabk DIANE WAYNE , Judo pe NONE , Deputy Sheriff BS025250 HERMOSA BEACH STOP OIL COALITION, ETC., ET AL Vs r . ,— DEPT. 86 I.R. MATTHEWS-DOTY , Dewa CW t NONE , E.R.M. (Patties and Counsel checked if ptaacot) Counsal For Plaintiff no appearances Coutuel For THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, ETC., lkkndant ET AL NATURE OF PaocEEDINGS: Administrative Records, read and considered by the court are orderee return to offering parties. Parties are to arrange for the pick-up. Moving party to submit a judgment for the court's records. A copy of this minute order is sent via U.S. Mail to all counse-- appearing 9-20-94 addressed as follows: JAN C. BROWN, ESQ. 881 ALMA REAL DRIVE STE. 304 LOS ANGELES, CALIF. 90272 JOHN QUIRK, ESQ. 550 NO. BRAND BLVD. STE. 2100 GLENDALE, CALIF. 91203 STEVEN B. QUINTANILLA, ESQ.' 281 SO. FIGUEROA STREET 2ND FLOOR Los ANGELES, CALIF. 90012 PAGE 3 OF 3 ().pt. s6 W gm F.oR.& Odob- n. I TOTAL F'.04 a RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED AND. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN BELOW. MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO. F NAME Oliver, Barr & Vose STREET AooREss 281 S. Figueroa Street CITY STATE Second Floor LLos Angeles, CA 90012 J Title Order No Escrow No QUITCLAIM DEED c PACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ computed on full value of property conveyed, or computed on full value less value of liens and• encumbrances remaining at the time of sale. Signature of Deuarant or Agent Determining Tax Firm Name Roy L. Stinnett dba Stinnett Oil Company &print hr Ivb! rtam! hr ge.Ir•ry S.. the undersigned grantor(s), for a valuable consideration. receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby remise, release and forever quitclaim to the City of Hermosa Beach the following described real property in the City of Hermosa Beach County of Los Angeles . State of California Any and all of grantor's interest, whether by leasehold, license or otherwise, in the real property and appurtenances thereon described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Assessor's parcel No. %_41 Executed on `� 197 . at I STATE OF RIGHT THUMBPRINT cc COUNTY OF m On before me, (Name, title of oRi"r-ie . 'Jane Doe. Notary Public) W 0 d personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfac- tory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are sub- scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instru- ment the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) // - I-/- `� V CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER(S) I7 INDIVIDUAL(S) ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) mnEtsn ❑ ATTORNEY IN FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: INAYE OF PERSONISI OR ENTITYPESII EXHIBIT "F" MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO NAME ADDRESS ZIP WOLCOTTS FORM 790 —Rev 1-93 This standard form is intended for the lyp,cal situations encountered in the held indicated However oelore you sign OUITCLAIM DEED ITINce cuss 31 read d fill m all blanks and make whatever changes are appropriate and necessary to your parti[ulaf IransKtibn Consult a tawyer it you doubt the loom s fitness for your purpose and use &,1993 wOLCOTTS FORMS. INC. 1 December 1, 1994 f �y Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 13, 1994 11 CITY LEGISLATIVE DELEGATE PROGRAM I have attached a memo from the League of California Cities regarding the City Legislative Delegate Program. The intent of the program is to establish closer ties with our State Senator and Assemblymember. The program hopefully will be an effective, consistent way to provide information to our State representatives on the impact of state actions on the City. The program is designed to have a Council member designated for State Senator Dills and Assemblywoman Bowen. I believe it would be a good idea to participate in this program both to support the statewide issues and to enhance our own local issues. Recommendation 1. That the City Council designate two Council members, one for Senator Dills and one for Assemblywoman Bowen; and, 2. That the designated Council members attend the January 18, 1995 League of California Cities reception for the legislature. A --I Respectfully submitted, 1A Stephen R. Burrell City Manager ff� 4 ❑®Mr o ®r DOME ©3100. O®®ML, California Cities, Work Together League of California Cities 1400 K STREET • SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • (916) 444-5790 !!!IMPORTANT NOTICE/REQUESTM League of California Cities City Legislative Delegate Program RETURN TO LEAGUE OFFICE ASAP! BECEIVnpED. ` "office. BACKGROUND: This year, the League Board of Directors has voted to establish a Ci r Legislative Delegate Program to help strengthen the grassroots effort of the League on such critical legislative issues as the state budget deliberations. When established, each city will have a designated member of the city council assigned as the city's primary contact/liaison with the legislator(s) in your area - both Senate and Assembly. TO DO - SHORT TERM: To assemble this statewide list of "City Legislative Delegates" we ask each city to do the following: 1. Name Delegate and Le islator. On the attached form, name the Mayor and/or Council Member from your city who will act as the city legislative delegate and name the Legislator to whom the city delegate will be assigned. While each city will have a procedure in place to choose a delgjte, it may provide a higher profile for the program if it is formally agendized for a city council meeting. . 2. IE Rislator Introductions. Between now and the end of the year, hopefully as soon as possible, have the city delegate introduce himself or herself to the legislator(s) of the area. This is especially critical if a new legislator has been elected. However, reintroduce yourself to an incumbent who has returned to office - it never hurts to maintain old contacts with your Legislator. A. roster of the new Legislature has been compiled for your use in making the introduction. Four Assembly seats are still in dispute at the time of this mailing. Telephone and office numbers for both the Assembly and Senate will remain unavailable until February, 1995. The general telephone number for the Assembly is 916,1445-3614. The general phone number for the Senate is 916/445-4251. 3. January 18, 1995 Invitation. Invite your Legislator. to t) p Wednesday, January 18, 1995 reception to be held by the League for League membership and members of the Legislature. This reception will take place between 5:30 and 7:30 pm in Sacramento at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in downtown Sacramento. It will be held as a part of the League's Mayors and Council Members' Institute, but we are encouraging all mayors and city council members to attend, not just those newly elected to office. PROGRAM GOALS: What does the League expect to accomplish with this program? The goals are as follows: 1. Personal Contact. Establish a stronger personal contact with legislators from your area because this is a critical link when delivering the League's message on key legislative issues. 2. Regular Communication. This program will help establish regular communication on city issues which is tremendously important to be successful in the legislative process. The League intends to use this network of city officials to distribute information, promote city interests and articulate city positions with members of the Legislature. 3. Proactive Forum. It is extremely important to take the initiative to deliver the city message on key issues. This program will help provide the initiative. 4. One Task Per Month. In order to maintain the integrity of the program, we are asking that each city establish the goal of making at least one contact per month during the 1995 legislative session with their Legislator. This may seem to be a significant demand, however, we expect that issues and opportunities for contacts will become easier as cities work within the program. 5. Promote Communication with City Officials. The program is also intended to accomplish greater communication between the delegate from the city and the rest of the city council on important legislative issues. 6. Reward for Citizens. Perhaps the greatest reward in the program will be the protection and promotion of city services with the citizens in your community. It can also help stimulate greater community -wide support for city programs. FOLLOW-UP: This project is under the guidance of the Mayors and Council Members' Department of the League. It is the intent of the Department to schedule a briefing/debriefing of the city delegates at the Mayors and Council Members' Executive Forum in Monterey in July. The meeting will be used to share successes, updates on the program and to receive reports on the latest from Sacramento in what we expect to be a very difficult year. Also, the Department intends to provide awards and recognition for the cities with the most active and innovative programs at the Monterey Executive Forum in July of 1995. We encourage city officials to develop and use the program in any manner that promotes the interest of cities on important legislative issues. Thank you for your interest. We look. forward to working close with you in 1995. It is expected to be a difficult year. This effort will be an important link in delivering the message of cities in the 1995 legislative session. The League wants and needs your eager participation. December 5, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 13, 1994 ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS City Council directed staff to place an item on this agenda regarding an alternative process for review and approval of entertainment permits. Two sample ordinances are attached to show the basic idea of the permit approach. If it is the desire of the City Council to explore this approach, staff would suggest that a proposed permit be developed after getting input from the business community. Recommendation: Provide direction to staff on whether or not the City Council wants to develop a permit process for entertainment activities which would be considered later at a public hearing. Respe fully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager SRB:reb NOV,. -08' 94 (TUE) 14 12 CITY OF C.aPITOLA TEL:1 4087�) 88;9 P.004 i ORDINANCE NO. 699 ORDINANCE OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPITOLA AMENDING CHAPTER 5.24 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPYTOLA HEREBY ORDAINS that former Chapter 5.24 of the Municipal Code is hereby repealed and Chapter 5.24 of the Municipal Code hereafter shall read as follows: CHANTER 5.24 ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS 5.24.005 Findings. 5.24.010 Entertainment defined. 5.24.020 Entertainment permit required. 5.24.025 Theater defined 5.24.030 Permit Classifications. 5.24.040 City Manager issuance. 5.24.050 Duration of permits. 5.24.060 Revocation on non -renewal. 5.24.070 Fees. 5.24.080 Application forms. 5.24.090 Violations. 5.24.005 Fi,ndi.ngs_ The City Council of the City of Capitola finds as follows; A. Entertainment often produces noise which is obtrusive to persons not patronizing the business or activity which produces the noise. B. The availability of entertainment is often a significant factor in attracting patrons who infringe upon the peace and quiet and nightly sleep of non -patrons, and is exacerbated by any of the following: 1. The entertainment is offered in conjunction with the distribution of alcohol. 2. The entertainment is offered by businesses which are open after 9:00 P.M. and do not, like theaters, have fixed beginning and ending times at which most of .-the patrons enter and exit. 3. The entertainment is offered in an area where there is a concentration of similar businesses, thereby resulting in the area becoming an after-hours "draw" and the patrons of those businesses frequently entering and exiting the other establishments. 4. The entertainment is offered in locations where many of the patrons, when leaving, pass through or near, areas where people reside. NOV-. -08'94(TUE) 14:12 CITY OF (:.aPIT()LA . s ORDINANCE NO. 699 TEL:I 408 479 8819 � G4 5 Page 2 P. 005 5.24.005 continued... C. To protect the peace and quiet of non -patrons and their nightly ability to sleep it is necessary to have a licensing system and to thereby limit and condition the establishments offering such entertainment. - D. Policing and monitoring entertainment licenses entails considerable expense to the City, such that it is appropriate to collect a portion of such expenses from the entities providing the entertainment. 5.24.010 Entertainment de ngd. "Entertainment", as used in this Chapter, includes: A. A performance by live entertainers for the purpose of entertaining the patrons of a business, or B. Playing recorded music, whether with or without video, for the specific purpose of entertaining the patrons of eating and/or drinking establishments. "Entertainment", as used in this Chapter, does not include a speech, pantomime or enactment (whether live or recorded), the primary purpose of which is to convey ideas of a political or religious nature, or to explain or critique the activities of public figures or of governmental or other institutions. It does not include mere background ("Muzak") music played at moderate levels. 5.24.020 Entertainment permit required_ No owner, manager or operator of any business or establishment (except "theaters", as defined in section 5.24.025) may arrange for or allow entertainment to be conducted on the premises of any such business or establishment without obtaining an entertainment permit as provided in this chapter. No person shall arrange for or promote entertainment on any publicly owned park, street, or facility without first obtaining an entertainment permit as provided in this chapter. However, entertainment which is entirely enclosed within a structure and which cannot, at any time, be audible outside of that structure, need not have any entertainment permit. i NOV.' -08' 0TUE) 14:15 ('; I T)' OF GAP I TOLA TEL: 1408 4 i 8879 P. 006 ORDINANCE NO. 599 Page 3 5.2 025 "Theater" define "Theater" for purposes of this Chapter, means an establishment: A. whose primary activity is showing movies or. staging theatrical productions which have fixed beginning and ending times; and B. which do not sell or dispense alcoholic beverages; and C. primarily offer food or drinks only to those attending the movie of theatrical event. 5 24.000 Pert classifi.cation_*_- Entertainment permits shall be classified as.follows: A. A Single Event Ent e tain nt Pe t may be issued for activities that will all occur within a single seven (7) day period. B. A Minor Entertainment Permit is for a business which offers entertainment incidental to the primary business, does not qualify for a single event permit, and which has no dance floor or elevated stage and.which never has a cover charge. C. A Regular Entertainment Permit is for businesses which offers entertainment, but which do not qualify for a Single Event Entertainment Permit or a Minor Entertainment Permit. 5.24.�o City M rager issuance. The city Manager may issue any of the permits described in the foregoing section except for the Regular Entertainment Permit, provided the City Manager is satisfied that no significant number of non -patrons will be disturbed by the entertainment or the goings and comings of the people frequenting the establishment that makes the entertainment available. If necessary to meet that criteria the City Manager may impose any reasonably related conditions. The City Manager may refer any application to the City Council. An applicant whose application is denied, or who is dissatisfied with the conditions imposed by the City Manager, may appeal to the City Council for a de -novo hearing. In ruling on any such applications, the City Council may impose any conditions reasonably related to the concerns described in Section 5.24.005. Such conditions include, but are not limited to, days and hours NOV. -08' 94 (TUE) 14 :14 CITY OF CAP I TOLA TEL:1 408 479 8819 v4 c P. 007 ORDINANCE No. 699 Page 4 5.24.05 Du.rati n of ermit5 The operative period of time for a Single Event Entertainment Permit shall be set forth in the permit itself. All other permits shall expire no later than one year from the date of issuance. The issuance of a permit for one year does not establish a vested right to a renewal of.,the permit. If, during any permit period, the nature of the business activity changes from the way it was described in the relevant application, it will be necessary for any permit holder to immediately apply for a new permit. 5.24.Q60 Revocation o no -rene al. A permit may be revoked by the City Council or new conditions imposed with at least five (5) days written notice to the permit holder (who shall have an opportunity to be heard) for failure to comply with permit conditions or for having supplied false information in obtaining the permit. The City Council may, for up to one year, refuse to issue a Regular Entertainment Permit for a business which has a history of violating the terms of previous permits, or which has a demonstrated pattern (not alleviated by imposing conditions) of attracting a clientele whose activities significantly interfere with the nightly sleep of non -patrons of normal sensibilities. 5.24.070 Feeg'. The City Council may establish fees for applications for any of the permits described in Section 5.24.030 of this chapter. it may also prescribe fees for the issuance of the permit itself. Any schedule or formula of permit fees may be based on reasonable estimations of the cost to the City of monitoring or enforcing permit compliance. 5.24.060 Apnlication forms. The City Manager may develop application forms pertinent to this chapter. Applicants may be required to submit any non -privileged information reasonably related to the concerns expressed in Section 5.24.005. itiOV. -08' 94 (TUE) 14:14 GITY OF GAPITOLA TEL:1 408 4-9 8879 P.008 ORDINANCE NO. 699 Page 5 5.24.090 violations. The operation of any business or entertainment activity contrary to the provisions of this chapter shall constitute a nuisance subject to abatement as provided in Chapter 9.56 of the Municipal Code. Operating a business contrary to the business's entertainment permit, orviolations of this chapter are also criminal acts subject to penalties provided in Section 1.08.010. PASSED FOR A FIRST READING this 11th day of October, 1990, by the following vote! AYES: council Members Routh, Bucher, Clarke and vice Mayor Graves. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mayor Harlan. ABSTAIN: None. CMC Vice Mayor READ A SECOND TIME AND PASSED FOR FINAL ADOPTION this 25th day of October, 1990, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Graves, Routh, Bucher, Clarke and Mayor Harlan. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. A�TTES i y Clerk , CMC Mayor THIS S TO CERTIFY THAT THE A13OVE AND FOREGOING IS A TUE AN: CORRECT COPY OF ORDINANCE NO. PASSED AND ADOPTED RY THE C(TY COUNCIL ON THE Cko 19 CITY &iRK NOV23 '94 03:07AN CTl-' ATTY PEDOHDO BCH P.1 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CALIFORNIA � — CITY ATTORNEYIS OFFICE 415.Diamond Street post Office Box 270 Redondo Beach CA 90277-0270 (310) 318-0655 (310) 372-3886 FAX FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL PAGE DATE: November 28, 1994 TIME: 0800 HRS T0: JAY REVICZKY, COUNC1124AN FIRM. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FROM: JERRY GODDARD, CITY ATTORNEY RE: ENTERTAINMENT ORDINANCE PAGES SENT: (including cover sheet) 5 SENT BY: JG MESSAGE: PER OUR PHONE CONVERSATION,- This ONVERSATION This messaue is intended_ for the use of the indiyidLal ter entity to which it is addressede and may contain information that is Erivilaged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us im—mediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via U.S. Postal Service. Please call (310) 318-0655, if you do not receive all pages noted or it any problem occurs in transmission. Thank you. J 417.01 REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE § 4-17.03 CHAPTER 17. AMUSEMENT AND ENTERTAMMENT PERIMITS' Sec. 4-17.01. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, unless othenvise apparent from the context, certain words and phrases used in this chapter are defined as follows: (a) "Live entertainment" shall mean and include, but not be limited to, any presentation or activity of any synthesized or live nature personally given which is designed or intended to divert, amuse, or attract the attention of persons observing such presentation or activity. - (b) "Person" shall mean and include ilia singular or plural and shall mean any natural person, rum, corporation, association, club, partnership, society, or organization. (c) Date of issuance. The actual date of issuance shall be the date the Council approves the permit and the time for appeals has expired. The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to any dance licensed pursuant to Article 3 of Chapter 2 of this title (Sections 4-2.301 et seq.). (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff. April 13, 1983) Sec. 4-17.02. Live entertainment: Permits required. No person shrill provide any type of entertainment on the premises of any business establishment or dance or concert had which is open to the public without charge or where an admission, cover charge, fee, or dona- tion is solicited therefor, or for entry thereto, unless such person first obtains a pennit as required by this chapter. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., etc April 13, 1983) Sec. 4-17.03. Permits: Applications. Every person required to procure a permit under the provisions of this chapter stall submit an application for such permit to the License Clerk and Collector. - - (a) Fonn of application. The application shall be a written statement upon a form provided by the License Clerk and Collector. Such form shall include an affidavit or declaration under penalty of per- jury to be sworn to by the applicant. *Sections 4-17.01 through 4-17.05, as added by Oidinance No. 1929 c.s.. cifeclive klatch 1, 1967, as .miended by Ordinance No. 1975 c.s., effeclive September 18, 1968, amended in their eniirety by Ordinance No. 2349 c.s., effective April 13, 1933. § 417.03 REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE § 4-17.64 Sec. 4-17.04. Pemlits: Expiration and renewal. (a) All entertainment permits issued prior to April 13, 1983, shall be subject to this chapter and shall expire on the anniversary date of issuance. (b) All permits issued after April 13, 1953, shall be for a period of one year from ilia date of issuance, unless a shorter period is provided by the Counch- (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff. April 13, 1983) fV Rnnrint No 1;Z - Anril ?9. 19113 (b) Contents of application. lite application shall contain the following information: o (1) The name and pemianent address of the applican-< (2) 'Ilia nature of the business entity: of (i) If the applicant is a corporation, the names an,3 addresses of Uta officers; and 1; (ii) If the applicant is a partnership, the names an addresses of the genera! partners; (3) The fictitious firm nacre, if any, together with a copG) of the certificate on file with the County Clerk-, 3 (4) A detailed description of the entertainment, including-, the type of entertainment, and any further information about the enter tafnment as the Council or Police Department may deem necess3rD (5) The date, hours, and location where such entertainmet—i _� is proposed and the admission fee, cover charge, or donation to t solicited for the purpose of admittance; (6) "Iiia names and addresses of the persons having t1-;' management or supervision of tare applicant's business; o (7) A statement of the nature and character of the appl, cant's business, if any, to be carried on in conjunction with such. enter tainnient; and (8) Such other reasonable information as to the nature of the applicant's business or identity or character of the persons having the management or supervision of the applicant's business as the Council may deem necessary. (c) Payment of fees. The application shall he accompanied by a nonrefundable application fee. Such free shall be established by resolu- tion of the Council and snail be in an.amount sufficient to defray the ex- penses of processing the application. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff. April 13, 1983) Sec. 4-17.04. Pemlits: Expiration and renewal. (a) All entertainment permits issued prior to April 13, 1983, shall be subject to this chapter and shall expire on the anniversary date of issuance. (b) All permits issued after April 13, 1953, shall be for a period of one year from ilia date of issuance, unless a shorter period is provided by the Counch- (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff. April 13, 1983) fV Rnnrint No 1;Z - Anril ?9. 19113 J 417.05 REDON Do BEACH MUNICIPALCODE § 4-17.06 Sec. 4-17.05. Pennits: Granting: Criteria: Conditions. (a) The Council shall not grant a live entertainment pemrit if the Council finds that the entertainment proposed for the subject loca- tion will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. In making such determinations, the Council shall consider: (I) Whether there will be an adverse impact of the proposed operation, including noise and traffic generation, on neighborhood uses and whether [lie potential impact can be mitigated; (2) Whether the hours of operation or nature of the activities uill conflict with nc;ighbering activities related to education, public healthy, and public assembly, such as schools, playgrounds, or hospitals; (3) Whether the proposed uses of die premises are compatible with the Genera Plan or will create a nuisance; (4) Whether the quality of the interior and exterior construction and furnishings will be sufficient to reduce the anticipated noise decibel levels to acceptable levels; (5) Whether fire permit would result in the violation of.any late or health or safety regulation; (6) Whether the staffing and supervision of the prenuses while the entertainment is to be performed is suitable or adequate; (7) Whether the applicant therefor has knowingly made a false statement on a material matter in his application or in his testimony before the issuing officer or Council and it is, therefore, in the public interests that he not be granted such permit; and ✓ (8) Such other criteria as may relate to the health, safety, lr& Ue peace, morals, comfort, protection, and general welfare of persons residing IH - or working in the neighborhood or t jprotect the property and improve- ments in tate neighborhood or lire general welfare of the City. (b) The Council may impose on any live entertainment permit' any condition ieasonabfy necessary .and proper to prutect the health, W 3d safety, peace, morals, comfort, protection, and general welfare of persons m 't" residing or working in fire neighborhood or to protect the properly and �0� improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. Tire 5{� Council may provide a permit expiration date which can he extended by further order of the Council. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 cs., eff. April 13, I983) Sec. 4-17.06, Permits: Invesligalions: Recommendations: licarinbs: Granting or denial. (a) Investigations After the completion and filing of anappli. cation with the License and Collection Department, the License and § 4-17.06 REDONDO BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE §4-17.06 Collection Department shall refer the matter to the Building Depart- ment, Fire Department, Planning Department, and Police Department for investigations and reports ihercon. Within a reasonable time, not to exceed twenty (20) days (excepting such delays as may be caused by the applicant), each said department shall thereupon review the application in the light of the criteria set forth in Section 4-17.05 of this chapter and make their recommendations to the Council. (b) Recommendations The License and Collection Department, upon receiving ail investigation reports, shall make its recommendation to the Council to grant, conditionally grant, or deny the subject applica- tion. Such reports shall be available for review by the applicant and the public. (c) Public hearings any such permit shall be granted or denied at a public hearing of the Council. (d) Public hearings: Notices. Public notice of the hearing on the application shall be given as follows: (1) By publication at least once in a daily newspaper of general circulation in the City not less than ten (10) calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing; and (2) By mailing a written notice thereof, not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of such -hearing, to the owner of the subject property and to the owners of properties within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property or properties; such notices shall be sent by first-class mail, with postage prepaid, using the addresses from the last equalized assessment roll, if available; and j (3) By pasting such notice in at least one prominent place on or about each parcel which is the subject of the proposed action, along or about the street line of such parcel- ]n the event more than one parcel is the subject of such hearing, and such parcels comprise 200 or more feet of street frontage, at least one such notice shall be posted on or about the street line at intervals of not less than 200 feet, starting at either end of the subject properties %vhere the property line intersects the street line. (e) Public hearings: Nances: Waivezx The Council, by a four- fifths (4/5) vote, may waive [lie notice requirements in a particular case if the proposed entertainment will not substantially increase traffic, cause large assemblages of people, or substantially increase noise on a continuing basis. .The notice requirements set forth in this section shall not apply to permits for single events. (f) Mohrrs to applicants., The City Cleric shall 'notify the appli- cant of the date and tiurc of such hearing by certified mail directed to the applicant at the address of the applicant set forth in the application not less than ten (10) days before the date thereof. i 0 n� m kD 4- § 4-17.06 REDONDO BEACII MUNICIPAL CODE § 4-17.08 (g) Public hearings. Presenfv!ion of testimony. At the hearing the applicant shall have the privilege of submitting such additional inforrrralion and/or facts winch lie believes will entitle trim to a permit, and all other interested persons shall be afforded an opportunity to present to the Council any facts which the Council may deern pertinent. (h) Further investigations. At the conclusion of taking testi- mony, the Council, at its discretion, may direct any City officer to in- vestigate any further facts made public at the hearing and may continue tire hearing for staff reports to a date within fifteen (15) days thereafter. (i) Decisions In any event, the Council shall render its decision upon such hearing within ten (10) days after the conclusion of the hearing. No such permit shall be denied without good cause. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff. April 13, 1983) Sec. 417.07. Permits: Revocation: Suspension: Modification: Grounds. A permit issued under this chapter shall be valid only for such enter- tainment as is specifically set forth in lire applicant's permit. Permits issued under the provisions of this chapter may be revoked, suspended, or modified after notice and a hearing as set forth in Section 4-17.08 of this chapter for any of the fbHowing causes: (a) Fraud, misrepresentation, or false statements contained in the application for the permit or renewal thereof; (b) Conducting entertainment not authorized by the permit; (c) Conducting entertainment subject to the permit in such a manne.r as to be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, protection, and general welfare of persons residing or working in tire' neighborhood or to protect the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City; (d) Failure to pay business license to les; (e) The violation 4f any applicable provision of Chapter 24 of this title; and (t) The breach of any coudition in the permit. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff. April 13, 1983) Sec. 4-17.03. Permits: Revocation: Suspension: Modification: Hearings. No permit shall be revoked or modified under the provisions of this section unless a hearing and notice containing a statement of reasons for the proposed revocation is given, which hearing small be held before the Council not less than ten (10) days after tire date of the service of the §A-17.08 REDONDO BEACH MIUNICIPALCODE § 4.17.10 notice upon the permittee. At such hearing, the permittee shall be per- mitted to introduce such evidence as is material to the hearing. The Chief of Police may suspend without a prior hearing an enter- tainment permit for a maximum of thirty (30) days if necessary for the protection of the public health and safety. The permittee shall be given the right to a hearing to be held before the Council if an appeal is filed within five (5) working days after the suspension. The hearing shall be held before the Council no less than ten (10) days after the date of the appeal. At such hearing the permittee shall be permitted to introduce such evidence as is material to the hearing. After the licaring the Council may revoke, suspend, or place restric- tions on the permit for a violation of the permit for any condition or circumstance which would have been grounds for permit denial or for any other good cause. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff. April 13, 1983) Sec. 4-17.09. Permits: Renewal: Procedure. Ile applicant for the renewal of a pemrit shall submit an application for such permit to the License Clerk and Collector. (a) Form of application. The application shall be a written state- ment upon a form provided by the License Cleric and Collector. Such form shall include an affidavit or declaration under penalty of perjury to be sworn to by the applicant. (b) Contents of application. The application shall require such information as set forth in Section 4-17-03 of this chapter, together with such information concerning the applicant's business during the preceding permit period as is, reasonably necessary to the determination of the ap- plicant's eligiblity for a renewal permit. (c) Renewal fees. The application for a renewal permit shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable renewal fee. Such fee shall be established by resolution of the Council and shall be in an amount sufficient to defray the expenses of processing the application. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c s., eff. April 13, 1983) Sec. 4-17.10. Delinquencies. To every entertainment permit mentioned or provided for in this chapter remaining unpaid following its date of expiration, there shall he added a penalty of twenty (207o) percent of the amount due after thirty (30) days. All entertainment permits not -renewed within sixty-one (61) days after the date of the expiration of the permit shall be null and void. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff. April 13, 1983) § 4-17. 11 REDONDo REACH MUNICIPALCODE § 4-17.14 See. 4-17.11. Penalties. Any person who carries on any business without first having ob-, tained an entertainment permit for the entertainment provided to the public therefor shalt pay a penalty of twenty (2015"o) percent of the pre- scribed fees. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff. April 13, 1983) Sec. 4-17.12. Permits: Nontransferable: Fees nonrefundable. (a) No permit fee under this chapter shall be refunded by reason of.3 permittee terminating permitted act.ivites. (b) No permittee shall transfer an entertainment permit. "Trans- fer", for the purposes of this section, shall mean change of ownership of the business of the permittee. (1) If the permittee is a corporation, "charge of owner- ship" shall mean actual change in the control of the corporation, or where the ownership of more than fifty (50 o) percent of the voting stock of the permittee corporation is acquired by a person or group of persons acting in concert, none of whom already owns fifty (5(Mo) per- cent or more of the voting stock, either singly or collectively. (2) If the pennittee is a partnership, "change of owner- ship" shall mean a change in the managing partners or general partner, or where the ownership of more than fifty (50;b) percent of the voting power of the permittee partnership is acquired by a person or group of persons acting in concert, none of whom already owns fifty (50 0) percent or more of the voting power of the permittee partnership, either singly or collec- tively. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s_, eff. April 13, 1983) Sec. 4-17.13. Permits: Change of location. No permittee Shall change the location of permitted activities pursuant to tins chapter without authorization. A permittee may apply for authorization to change the location of pennitted activities. Such an application shall be accompanied by a fee equal to the fce set by sub- section (c) of Section 4-17.03 of this chapter and shall be processed under Sections 4-17.05 and 417-06 of this chapter and be subject to Council review and approval thereunder_ (§ I, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff. April 13, 1983) Sec. 4-17.14. Hours of operation. . No dancing or entertainment shalt be conducted in an establishment licensed pursuant to this chapter between 2:00 am. and 6:00 am. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s., eff_ April 13, 1993) § 4-17.15 REDONDO REACH MUNICIPAL CODE §417.16 Sec. 4-17.15. Violations: Penalties. Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be subject to a fine not exceeding Five Hundred and no(100ths (5500.00) Dollars, or to imprisonment in die County Jail for a period not exceeding six (6) months, or to both such fine and imprisonment in the discretion of the court. (§ 1, Ord. 2349 c.s_, cff- April 13, 1983) Sec, 4-17.16. Waiver of fees. The permit fees required by this chapter may be waived by order of the Council for the charitable organizations described in Section 6-1.08 of Chapter I of Title 6 of this Code. (§ 1, Ord_ 2349 c.s., eff_ April 13, 1983) 14, a Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Memorandum Date: November 29, 1994 To: Ken Robertson From: Carol Duff Re: Fiesta Information for Downtown Enhancement Commission The following information is provided to assist you in responding to the Downtown Enhancement Commission's inquiries regarding the Fiesta de las Artes. If there are any additional issues to address, please let me know. Benefits to the City It is estimated that approximately 250,000 people visit downtown Hermosa Beach during the six Fiesta days each year. The positive economic impact of the events is substantial. In addition to creating a positive image for Hermosa Beach, the Fiestas are an important civic and economic stimulus for the city. Benefits To Businesses and the City A poll of artists and vendors in the most recent Fiesta provided the following information. Each of the 435 artists and vendors participating in one Fiesta is accompanied by an average of 3 people. They spend an average of $65 per person in Hermosa Beach businesses during each three-day event. This does not include what they spend with other artists and vendors. With a total of 435 artists and vendors, this amounts to a total of 1,305 people. Each of these people spending $65 during three days amounts to $84,825 in revenue for our local businesses. The artists and their families stay in our hotels, eat in our restaurants, shop in our grocery stores, purchase gasoline in our service stations, and patronize our retailers. The money spent in these particular businesses generates a significant amount of sales tax. Visitors attending the Fiesta not only patronize the artists and vendors at the event, they also eat in our restaurants, stay in our hotels and patronize our retailers. Many visitors comment that they would not know Hermosa Beach existed if it weren't for the Fiesta. Visitors often return to our downtown area at other times during the year, having discovered it initially during the Fiesta. When they return, they once again patronize our businesses, stimulating the local economy throughout the year. The residual benefit of returning visitors is an ongoing economic stimulus. 1 SUPPLEMENTAL 1'j INFORMAT!fl�i I 1 Benefit To Non -Profit Groups As in the past, the Chamber gave 14 local non-profit groups free space in the last Fiesta, an in-kind contribution totaling $9,380 per year. For most groups, the Fiestas generate nearly all their income. Local groups provided us with their Fiesta revenues for 1994: L.A. County Lifeguard Association $14,000 Rotary Club $ 4,500 Knights of Columbus $ 3,000 Hermosa Beach Veterans Memorial Committee $ 2,500 Hermosa Beach Firefighters Association $ 2,000 Hermosa Valley Parent Teacher Organization $ 1,823 Kiwanis Club of Hermosa Beach $ 1,800 Hermosa Beach Historical Society $ 1,500 AYSO $ 1,100 Sister Cities Association $ 900 Boy Scouts $ 900 Hermosa Beach Police Officers Association $ 525 First Night $ 400 Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation $ 400 Total income to non-profit organizations: $34,948 Public Safety Benefits On Memorial Day and Labor Day weekends, many beach cities are forced to increase the number of police officers on duty to handle large and often unruly holiday crowds. This is not the case in Hermosa Beach. Additional officers are not required, and the Chamber pays for officers who patrol the venue. The cost savings to the city for additional officers on two 3 -day holiday weekends is substantial. From a law enforcement and emergency services standpoint, the Fiesta is not an intensive event. Fewer complaints are received on Fiesta weekends than on any other holiday weekends. Benefits to the Community Prudent fiscal management of the Fiesta has insured an event that is profitable enough to sustain a full-service Chamber of Commerce throughout the year. The Chamber provides community, demographic and business information, maps, and business referrals free of charge in response to hundreds of inquiries each year. Chamber Contributions To Community The Chamber has been able to share the financial benefits of the Fiesta through a number of generous contributions to others in the community. Following is a list of the recipients of contributions: Holiday Banners $ 2,500 Holiday Jazz Concerts $ 5,000 Vision Hermosa $ 5,000 Visits With Santa $ 1,000 High School Student Scholarship $ 2,000 Elementary Student Recognition $ 500 L.A. County Lifeguard Association $ 700 Downtown Street & Sidewalk Cleaning $ 5,000 Hermosa Beach Veterans Memorial $ 500 Farmers' Market Management $ 8,500 Community Information & Promotion Materials $ 3,500 Community Information & Promotion Staff Time $18,500 Total 1995 Contributions $52,700 Traffic Management For the past seven years, the Chamber has retained an event management firm to coordinate site, parking and transportation logistics. Two separate and distinct parking and shuttle systems are created, one in Manhattan Beach and one in Redondo Beach. From 7 am to 7 pm nine to twelve shuttle buses run every 10 to 15 minutes to each of the two shuttle parking lots. Along with a sophisticated signage system and professional security personnel directing vehicles, traffic congestion is minimal. Lots A and C remain open throughout the three days of each Fiesta. Efficient flow to the lots is facilitated through strategically placed personnel with walkie talkies who give drivers advance notice if lots are full so they will have sufficient time to park in other areas. This traffic management program was developed and approved in 1987 by a group including city staff, police and parking enforcement representatives, residents, and downtown business owners. This system virtually eliminates gridlock in the downtown area. 3 J Merchant Notification Although the Fiesta de las Artes has been held for nearly twenty years, turnover in business ownership in the downtown area is acknowledged and continuing merchant notification is addressed. Businesses are contacted by Chamber staff throughout the year regarding Chamber membership, business promotion events and the Fiesta. On the Thursday prior to each Fiesta, Chamber and event management staff delineate the vendor spaces. During this process, the merchants are shown where their space is located and event participation guidelines are reviewed. In addition to receiving other membership benefits, Chamber members in the Fiesta area are given one free space in front of their business for all six event days. Conclusion The Fiesta de las Artes is a Hermosa Beach tradition, originally created by a group of artists in the downtown area. When the event expanded and became too large for the group to handle, they asked the Chamber of Commerce to become the official sponsor of the Fiesta de las Artes. Recognizing the need to continue the event to promote the city and provide exposure for the downtown business district, the Chamber accepted the event sponsorship. The Chamber reimburses the City for all city services required to oversee the Fiestas, and does not request any fee waivers or city funding for the events. F,