Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/14/95"Love quickens all senses except the common. Happy Valentine's Day AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 1995 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK Robert Benz Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER John Bowler John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Sam Y. Edgerton Stephen R. Burrell Julie Oakes CITY ATTORNEY J. R. Reviczky Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PRESENTATION: ' Where�p � there is no vision the le risk a 0 � � Teo t . HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOMEI By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government .welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings. are televised live on .Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may. provide input to. their elected Councilmembers in writing or orally.: Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet compilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in' person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see -the 'notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no. discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agenda is developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allotted. In compliance with the Amerlcans With Disabilities Act ifyou need special p: � Y p assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204. Please provide enough time to enable us to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council_ for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. GLOSSARY Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval - requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law -or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. f Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager... The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. , (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion .of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Lawrence Fordiani dated January 9, 1995 requesting Council review of commercial encroachment license fees. 2. Letter from Scott Macpherson and a report prepared by Macpherson Oil Company dated February 9, 1995 exploring the possible City services and projects that could be financed through Tidelands royalty revenues. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City. Council held on January 24, 1995. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. _ 2 Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 1, 1995. 3 (d) Recommendation tolado t a resolution)cknowled in the recei t and Pilin of the Annual Statement of Investmed Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach. (Continued from meeting of January 24, 1994) Memorandum from City Treasurer John Workman dated February 7, 1995. (e) Recommendation to deny the following claim(s) and refer to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: Claimant: Alario, Chantal A , Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 01/26/95 Claimants Cantor, Robert J. Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 01/09/95 Claimant: Orick, Holli Date of Loss: 01/05/95 Date Filed: 01/09/95 Claimant: Willhite, Richard Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 02/01/95 Claimant: Clark, Elizabeth C. Date of Loss: 01/04/95 --- - Date Filed: 02/01/95 Claimant: Knapick, Michael Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 02/01/95 Claimant: Brill, Charles.J. Date of Loss: 01/02/95 Date Filed: 01/18/95 Claimant: Marshall, Winston Date of Loss: 07/04/94 Date Filed: 01/03/95 Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 1, 1995. 3 (f) Recommendation to adoq t a resolution authorizin the Finance Director as ' e� 7� � the designated agent for all matters n rtaining to Federal and State disaster /V assistance. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 2, 1995. (g) v/Recommendation to(adoot a resolution�certifying the engineering and traffic survey which sets speed limits on Pacific Coast Highway and Artesia Boulevard. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 30, -1995. (h) VRecommendation to adopt a resolution approving the application for discretionary regions funds for the construction of sidewalk/handicap ramps at various locations in the City: Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 30, 1995. (i) Recommendation to appropriate Lighting and Landscape District funds for the undergrounding of offsite utilities and onsite security lighting at South Park. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 31, 1995. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING PARKING STANDARDS FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTERS AND ADOPTION OF E ONMENTAL NEG TIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction from Community Development Director Sol B umenfeld dated. February 6, 1995. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. CONSIDERATION OF NAMING SOUTH PARK "DEWEY WEBER PARK". (Continued from meeting of Januwy 24, 1995) Memorandum from Community Resources Director. Mary Rooney dated January 17, 1995. 4 6. PIER RENOVATION PROJECT (CIP 94-620): RECOMMENDATION TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT TO PREPARE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 31, 1995. 7. JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 7, 1995. 8. REPORT ON FUNDING THE DOWNTOWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 7, 1995. 9. SOUTH BAY CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM (MOU). Memorandum from Community. Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated January 23, 1995. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER NONE 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL NONE CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on February 7, 1995. 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR: PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 Property: That portion of property currently utilized for surface _ parking at the westerly edge of the shopping center located at 1100 Pacific Coast Highway Negotiating Parties: Stephen Burrell Roger Bacon Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment 5 2 V-SP.-R E'P D.. . 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY'COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, February 14, 1995, at the hour of 7: 0o0P.M,' PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - v ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz Absent: None PRESENTATION: PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION TO OFFICER TIMOTHY TUREK, OFFICER KURT MICHAEL, AND RESERVE OFFICER DANA REINHARDT � Y ANNOUNCEMENT: -PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from • taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. - (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception;: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens may also speak: (1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; (2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, (3) before the close of the meeting during "'Citizen Comments " . Citizens with comments regarding City management of departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. Coming forward to-address the Council at this time were:- . (b). WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONSQ-?,� 1. Letter from Lawrence Fordiani dated January 9, 1995 requesting Council review of.commercial encroachment license fees. Coming forward to address the.Council on this item was: Lawrence Fordiani - Redondo Beach, ^ n1 Action: To G�. 2. Letter from Scott Macpherson and a report prepared by . Macpherson Oil Company dated February 9, 1995 exploring the possible City services and projects.that could be financed through Tidelands royalty revenues. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: /A 1 ds Action: To • 1. CONSENT CALENDAR The following more routine matters will be acted upon by -.one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will' be, no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. Council member requests to remove items— from the consent calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) Public comments on the Consent Calendar. Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (i), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in.order for clarity: (a) Motion , second So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not VIII removed from'the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: •1-9 ��I tt J ') Minutes of the Regular meeting held on 1" 4. Action: To approve the minutes of the the Regular Meeting of as (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTRAR AND TO APPROVE THE CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN WARRANTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the check registrar as presented. (C) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE. AGENDA ITEMS. • Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. li (d) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. (Continued from meeting of January . 24, 1994) Memorandum from C'ty Treasurer John Workman dated February 7, 1995. ACtion: To approve the City Treasurer's recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 95-571$, entitled, "A RESOLUTION �� OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR 1995.11, which grants authorization to invest in: 1) Time Certificates of Deposit; 2) U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes and Bonds; 3) Medium -Term Notes (MTN); n 4) Bankers Acceptances; N 5) California State Local Agency Investment Fund; °ll 6) Los Angeles County Pool Investment Fund; 7) Repurchase Agreements; and, 8) Federally Sponsored Agency Securities. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS AND REFER THEM TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 1, 1995. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to deny the following claims, six of which were caused by the. January 6, 1995 storm which caused flooding at the 414 Second Street garage area, and refer to the City's Liability Claims Administrator 1) Claimant: Alario, Chantel A. Date of.Loss:` 01/04/95 Date Filed 01/26/95 Allegation: Claimant alleges City action (sandbagging on 8th Street diverted water), caused flooding of garage. 2) Claimant: Cantor, Robert J. Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 0.1/09/95 Allegation: Claimant alleges City action (sandbagging on 8th Street diverted • water), caused flooding of garage. 3) Claimant: Orick, Holli Date.of Loss: 01/05/95 Date Filed: 01/09/95 { • Allegation: Claimant alleges City action caused 2nd Street to overflow due to wood chips from running path plugging drain. 4) Claimant: Willhite, Richard Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 02/01/95 Allegation: Claimant alleges storm drain stopped . up due to wood chips from City -owned "land, and caused garage to flood. 5) Claimant: Clark, Elizabeth C. Date of Loss: 01/04/95 .Date Filed: 02/01/95, Allegation: Claimant alleges storm drain stopped . up due to wood chips from City -owned land,.and caused garage to flood. 6) Claimant: Knapick, Michael Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 02/01/95 Allegation: Claimant .alleges storm drain stopped , up due to wood chips from City -owned land, and caused garage to flood. 7) Claimant:. Brill, Charles J. Date of Loss: 01/02/95 Date Filed: 01/18/95 Allegation: Claimant alleges storm drain was not cleared prior to rain on 01/02/95 causing storm drain to back up and flood garage at 16 The Strand. 8) Claimant: Marshall, Winston' Date of Loss: 07/04/94 Date Filed: 01/03/95 Allegation: Claimant alleges that while roller blading, his.wheel caught in a large crack at 2800 block of the Strand causing him to fall and break his ankle.. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AS THE DESIGNATED AGENT FOR ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO FEDERAL AND STATE DISASTER ASSISTANCE. Memorandum from Finance Director. Viki Copeland dated February 2, 1995. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 95-57/iv entitled, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AS DESIGNATED AGENT TO PROVIDE, TO THE STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES. FOR ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO SUCH STATE DISASTER ASSISTANCE, THE ASSURANCES AND AGREEMENTS REQUIRED." (g) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY WHICH SETS SPEED LIMITS ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND ARTESIA BOULEVARD.; Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 30, 1995. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 95-5717, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY.", which reflects consistency with the existing i speed limits for Pacific Coast Highway and; Artesia • Boulevard, and allows the Hermosa Beach Police to legally enforce those speed limits.. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR DISCRETIONARY REGIONAL FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK/HANDICAP RAMPS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 30, 1995. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 95-57147, entitled, "A _) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA �v BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUNDS UNDER SB 821 AND APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF ITS BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN PLAN."# which .approves the application for TDA Article 3 funds, in the amount of $7,344, to fund a portion of the construction of sidewalk/handicap ramps at various locations in the City in connection with the Street Rehabilitation (CIP • 94-141 and 94-149) of Monterey Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue. • (i) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE DISTRICT FONDS FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF OFFSITE UTILITIES AND ONSITE SECURITY LIGHTING AT SOUTH PARK. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 31, 19.95. Action: Toapprove the staff recommendation to: 1) appropriate Lighting and Landscape District Funds in the amount of $11,394.76 to underground the street lights on Valley Drive between Second and Sixth Streets, in keeping with the City policy requiring new developments to underground utilities adjacent to their property; and, 2) appropriate Lighting and Landscape District •Funds in the amount of $40,000 to the South Park Project (CIP 94-515) to install security lighting within South Park, in order to alleviate concerns of neighboring residents and the Police Department. due to the lack of security lighting in the park for this phase of construction, noting that the total $51394.76 cost for these projects would leave a balance. of $846,859.24 in the Lighting and Landscape District Fund. • 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1( ), ( ), ( ), and ( ) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown..under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. -TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING PARKING STANDARDS FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTERS AND ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 6, 1995. • Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. i The public hearing opened at, 7:35 P.M. The public hearing closed at P.M. Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at'7:55P:M. • Action: To approve the Planning Commission and staff recommendation to introduce Ordinance No..94-1126. MotionQ, secondThe motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 94-1126, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTERS AND THE ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION.0 Motion �eA , second AYES: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES None • MUNICIPAL MATTERS S. CONSIDERATION OF. NAMING SOUTH PARK "DEWEY WEBER PARKIN. (Continued from meeting of January 24, 1995) Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 17, 1995. Supplemental letter from Karen Johnson, 608 Hollowell, dated February 13; xx YDS 6.PIER RENOVATION PROJECT (CIP 94-620): RECOMMENDATION TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT TO PREPARE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 31, 1995. II Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report ort • and, responded to Council questions. �/ / � . oC/t'`J �../. %.! •fir � �' Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) reject all proposals received for the Pier Renovation Project (CIP 94-620); 2) approve the award of contract to prepare architectural, engineering and construction documents for the Pier Renovation Project to a team comprised of Alpha Engineering and IBI group in the amount of $210,000; and, 3) authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within 15 percent of the contract cost. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 7. JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 7, 1995, City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To direct staff to participate in the examination of this approach of providing electrical service and report back to the City Council as the issue develops. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. c� ,I �8. REPORT ON FUNDING THE DOWNTOWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 7, 1995. Supplemental letter from Ron Pizer, ..518 The Strand, received February 14, 1995. City. Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: • 1) approve the proposed financing strategy for the funding of the Downtown Improvement to include: C a) - installation of parking meters on upper Pier G_. Avenue ; / ' • b) change the parking meter rates from $.25 for one-half hour to $.25 for 15 minutes to bring Hermosa Beach parking rates into line with the majority. of beach cities in the area; c) authorize the City Manager to work with a Bond Council (Counsel ????) to develop a financing method for the Downtown Implementation Plan (City Manager to return to City Council for approval of the agreement between the City and Bond Council (Counsel ????) :--fid) authorize the City Manager to negotiate a contract with the IBI Group and return to 44"" Council with a completed contract for 2 construction drawings and specifications for Upper and Lower Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue from Eighth Street to 16th Street; e) authorize the City Manager to approve expenditures for appropriate or as-needed professional services, such as appraisers, in conducting the financial plan for the Downtown Implementation.. ��-✓� Motion , second The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of L___7gee 9. SOUTH BAY CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM (MOU). Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated. January 23, 1995. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. - �- Action: To approve the staff recommendation to enter' into a Memorandum: of Understanding (non-binding.) with other South Bay jurisdictions and the U.S. Department of' Energy (DOE) to authorize the participation of .the City of Hermosa Beach in the South Bay Clean Cities Program to �. facilitate and expand the use of alternative fuels. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. I 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER NONE. 12. _MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 13. OTHER MATTERS CITY COUNCIL NONE CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's_ jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Co ncil at this time were: ANNOUNCEMENT .IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting © held on February 7, 1995. /V 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR: PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 �Y t� Property.. That portion of property currently /k utilized for surface parking at the westerly edge 'of the shopping center located at 1100 Pacific Coast Highway Negotiating Parties Stephen'Burrell J Roger,Bacon Under Negotiation: --Price & Terms of Payment • Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. Closed Session -.Immediately following Regular Session CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Police Chief Val Straser ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT PRESENTATION: CHIEF STRASER COMMENTED THAT ALL THREE OFFICERS ARE BEING CONSIDERED FOR THE MEDAL OF VALOR AWARD. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Rosamond Fogg: Spoke regardingMacpherson's written communication on use of Tideland monies for funding of certain city projects stating that many of the comments included in the report are incorrect. Tom Morley: Spoke regardingMacpherson's written communication and presented material to support his opinion that some of the figures in the report relating to are estimated oil production and revenues are inflated Don Macpherson Responded to statements made by Ms. Fogg and Mr. Morley. Stated that information contained in petition statement is incorrect and not based on fact. John Burt: Spoke in support of the Macpherson Oil project. Ir Leonard Brock: State that he has worked as a consultant on this oil project. Stated that there is very little risk of subsidence or induced seismicity as the Stop Oil supporters have suggested Clarified that tideland funds can be used for police, fire, safety, and health inspectors and has been used for this purpose in Long Beach. Pat Davis, Macpherson Oil: Stated that two to three years after the commencement of. drilling, there should be enough information to borrow funds against the oil production to fund city projects. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS L Letter from Lawrence Fordiani dated January9, 1995 requesting Council review of commercial encroachment license fees. JR/RB MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. VOTE: 5-0 2. Letter from Scott Macpherson and a report prepared by Macpherson Oil Company dated February 9, 1995 exploring the possible City services and projects that could be financed through Tidelands royalty revenues. Don Macpherson, Macpherson Oil: Stated that after drilling has begun, the City can begin to borrow moneya ainst ro'ected revenues to o bond debt. g P J Pte' .� I Tom Morley: Cited a statement made in a letter from Macpherson regarding drilling from a lease site in Redondo Beach. Don Macpherson: Stated that it is against the law to drill into Hermosa Beach from a location outside of Hermosa Beach. SE questioned if there is anything that can be done to correct statements to an initiative Petition if they arefound to befalse- City Attorney clarified that if the initiativepetition contains incorrect statements it is still the City's duty to place it on the ballot and the inconsistencies are to be dealt with in theP olitical arena. SE/JB MOUON TO RECEIVE AND FILE. VOTE 5-0 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on January 24, 1995. .(b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. 2 (d) Recommendation to adopt a resolution acknowledging the receipt and filin of the Annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach. (Continued from meeting of Januwy 24, 1994) Memorandum from City Treasurer John Workman dated February 7, 1995. PULLED BY JO QUESTIONED WHAT CHANGES HAD BEEN MADE TO THE POLICY. CITY ATTORNEY CLARIFIED THAT THE CHANGES WERE MAINLY TO CORRECT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS REFEREED TO IN THE DOCUMENT. JO/SE MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION. ' VOTE 5-0 (e) Recommendation to deny the following claim(s) and refer to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: Claimant: Alario, Chantal A. Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: .01/26/95 Claimant; _ Cantor, Robert J. Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 01/09/95 Claimant: Orick, Holli Date of Loss: 01/05/95 Date Filed: 01/09/95 Claimant: Willhite, Richard Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 02/01/95 Claimant: Clark, Elizabeth C. Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 02/01/95 Claimant: Knapick, Michael Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed: 02/01/95 Claimant: Brill, Charles J. Date of Loss: 01/02/95 Date Filed: 01/18/95 Claimant: Marshall, Winston Date of Loss: 07/04/94 Date Filed: 01/03/95 Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 1, 1995. PULLED BY RB RB COMMENTED ON CLAIMS MADE FOR FLOODING IN THE UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE LOCATED ON 2ND STREET. RB/JB MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 (f) Recommendation to adopt a resolution authorizing the Finance Director as the designated agent for all matters pertaining to Federal and State disaster assistance. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 2, 1995. (g) Recommendation to adopt a resolution certifyingthe he engineering and traffic survey which sets speed limits on Pacific Coast Highway and Artesia Boulevard. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 30, 1995. (h) Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving the application for discretionary regional funds for the construction of sidewalk/handicap ramps at various locations in the City. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 30, 1995. PULLED BY SE SE/JO MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 (i) Recommendation to appropriate Lighting and Landscape District funds for the undergrounding of offsite utilities and onsite security lighting at South Park. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 31, 1995. PULLED BY SE IFSE/ji MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 4 NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO. COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING PARKING STANDARDS FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTERS AND ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum and Ordinance for introduction from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 6, 1995. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 7:34PM PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:34PM SE/JB MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE. VOTE: 5-0 RB/JR MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING. VOTE: 5-0 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. CONSIDERATION OF NAMING SOUTH PARK "DEWEY WEBER PARK". (Coniinued from meeting of .7anuary 24, 1995) Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 17, 1995, John Burt: Stated that City should wait on building parks until there is oil revenue. Pete Tucker: Clarified that Dewey Weber began his business in Venice and later moved it to Hermosa Beach while other's in the surf industry had their beginnings in Hermosa Beach and have stayed here. Felt that by naming park after Dewey Weber, the City would appear to be overlooking other Hermosa Beach surfing businesses. 6. PIER RENOVATION PROJECT (CIP 94-620): RECOMMENDATION TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT TO PREPARE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated January 31, 1995. 5 John Burt: Stated that the structural integrity of the pier should be checked but any renovation should be put on hold until there is oil revenue. Roger Bacon: Spoke in support of downtown funding plan. Suggested placing a building near the pier for the historical society. JO/SE MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 7. JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 7, 1995. SE STATED THAT THERE WAS AN ARTICLE IN THE L.A. TIMES ON THIS ISSUE ABOUT TWO MONTHS AGO AND SUGGESTED THAT COUNCIL REVIEW THIS ARTICLE. SE/JR MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 4-1 (RB -NO) 8. REPORT ON FUNDING THE DOWNTOWN EVIPLEIVIENTATION PLAN. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 7, 1995. Jerry Newton: Felt that council should approve staff recommendation as a financing strategy so that staff can begin work. Rick Learned.- Feels that council should make the big decision to move ahead and let the marketplace give us a track record Jim Dewey: Stated that following approval of funding plan and the beginning of work the City should consider a marketing program to promote the downtown improvements Rick Henkis. Questioned if there was going to be a shortening of the length of time per meter from 3 hrs to 1 hr and stated his opposition to any such plan. Patricia Spiritus: Stated her feeling that any improvement will cause the City to prosper but fears that increasing meter fees without any immediate benefits, along with the initial disruption that construction will bring, will be detrimental. Suggested increasing the enforcement time on meters from 8pm to 12am or look at other funding sources Gary Wayland. • Feels council should show support to the new businesses that came here based on the future to downtown by showing support for this funding program. Parker Herriott. Questioned whether funding of downtown would be placed on the ballot. Feels it would be a good idea to place this issue on the ballot. John Burt: Would like to see parking put back on Pacific Coast Highway. 6 Roger Bacon: Feels council should support this funding plan. JR SUGGESTED A METER INCREASE TEST AREA, PUBLIC HEARINGS IN INCREASES AND ADDITION OF METERS ON UPPER PIER AVE., LOOK INTO POSSIBLE REVENUE FROM METERING THE PARKING LOTS, WOULD LIKE MORE INFO ON OTHER FORMS OF FINANCING THAT WOULD TARGET COMMERCIAL USERS RATHER THAN RESIDENTS, LOOK INTO UPPER PIER METERS BEING METERS THAT WE WANT TO KEEP THERE AND NOT BUY METERS NOW AND THEN USE DIFFERENT METERS LATER, RESEARCH POSSIBLE REVENUETOR AN INCREASE IN HOURS OF ENFORCEMENT OF METERS, RESEARCH PROS & CONS OF PARKING PASSES THAT ARE GOOD AT ALL METERS INSTEAD OF JUST YELLOW METERS. JO STRESSED THE IMPORTANT OF HAVING SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM VISION OF THE EFFECT ON BUSINESSES DURING THE CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE, PLAN AND THE BENEFITS (ORNON-BENEFITS)TO RESIDENTS. AGREES WITH RESEARCHING METERING PARKING LOTS. SUGGESTED LOOKING INTO USED PARKING METERS FOR UPPER PIER AVE. JB FEELS PROJECT SHOULD BE APPROVED CONCEPTUALLY. APPROVE USE OF METER FUNDS AND LET STAFF RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ON OPTIONS. RB FEELS NIGHTTIME ACTIVITY SHOULD START TO GENERATE REVENUE BY CHANGING ENFORCEMENT PERIOD FROM 8PM TO 12AM. SUGGESTED SPECIAL EVENTS WITH REVENUE SPECIFICALLY ALLOCATED FOR DOWNTOWN IlVIPROVEMENT. JR/JB MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS -CITY MANAGER NONE 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL NONE CITIZEN COMMENTS John Burt: Feels speed limits on Strand should be enforced Pete Tucker: Stated that proposed roller hockey rink at South Park should be made of concrete rather than asphalt. Suggested City look into a corporate sponsor for the additional funding to make this improvement. Rosamond Fogg: Spoke . to comments made by Don Macpherson regarding statements made in the initiative petition. Don Macpherson: Responded to Ms. Fogg's statements and stated that he would write a letter to Council claming issues raised by Ms Fogg. Parker Herriott: Felt that there should be emergency lighting on the Biltmore Site. Stated that seating wall is not in permitted by the ordinance. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on February 7, 1995. 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR: PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 Property: That portion of property currently utilized for surface parking at the westerly edge of the shopping center located at 1100 Pacific Coast Highway Negotiating Parties: Stephen Burrell Roger Bacon 8 Ed/Benz- for staff recomednaati n withpublic hearing if talking about parking meters on upper Pier Avenue and changing rates. Contract drawings would be public hearing. Creative funding, meterize public lots, increased enforcement hours, ask Downtown Enhancement Commission to contribute. IBI contract when negotiated would come back' for evaluation of cost and whether should go out to bid. Design contract and parking comes back as public hearing. Rates go uup as of now. 5-0 i ii• Potential Uses for Oil Royalty Hermosa Beach Estimated Estimate % Funded by Total Funded . Proiect of Cost Royalty Revenue by Royalty Difference Pier Renovation $ 3,100,000 100% (1): $. 3,100,000 $ -" Parking Structures $ 6,000,000 50% (2) $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 . Downtown Enhancement $ 7,072,000 25% py $ 1,768,000 $ 5,304,000 South Park $ 300,000 100%° (4) $ 300,000 $ - Biltmore Site Park $ 75,000 100% (4) $ 75,000 $ - $ 16, 547, 000 $ :8,243,000 $ 8,304,000 Revenue Estimates Over Life Of Project Tideland Fund Royalty $ . 65,116,697 - May be used for tideland area improvements. General Fund Royalty $ 39,058,858 - Use restricted (by city vote) to acquisition and maintenance of open space, School Royalty $ 5,446,270 Total Royalty $ 109,621,825 (1) 100% of cost (or debt service) could be paid out of Tideland Royalty Revenue.. (2) This is an estimate, the actual percentage may be more or less than 50% - Tideland Royalty Revenue. (3) This is an estimate, the actual number may be more or less than 25% - Tideland Royalty Revenue. (4) 100% of cost (or debt service) could be paid from General Fund Royalty Revenue. Prepared by Macpherson Oil Company ROYUSES.XLS 2/14/95 February 14, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting ,of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 14, 1995 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Recommendation It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution relative to the Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach. The Investment Policy will comply with the Government Code which governs municipal investments in the State of California. The California Government Code provides a large menu of legally allowed public fund investment opportunities. I have attempted to tailor this investment policy to reflect the council's investment personality. While continuing to strive for maximum return on investment funds, safety of principal is my first priority. I have requested authorization, subject to various limits asset forth in the Investment Policy, to invest in: 1. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 2. Treasury Bills, Notes; and Bonds 3. Medium -Term Notes (MTM) 4. Bankers.Acceptances 5. California State Local Agency Investment Fund 6. Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Fund 7. Repurchase Agreements 8. Federally Sponsored Agency Securities SUPPLEMENTAL" � INFORMATION RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING AN INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the City Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach recommends adoption of the.Investment Policy attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: That the Investment Policv for the Citv of Hermosa Beach 47 y 9s. HERMOSA BEACH STOP OIL COALITION In re Macpherson Oil,submitted written .communication, 2/1.4/95: 1: Suggests tidelands revenue could have a wider variety of applications`for Hermosa Beach than the law allows. 2. It's full of qualifying language ('potential', 'might', 'could', 'may') and groundless assumptions (well Production and location, oil value)` 3. Report suggests that the -voters' might reallocate' oil money Ior other uses, utterly ignoring the fact that drilling was approved solely to purchase the greenbelt and other open space, and a more recent vote recommitted oil revenue exclusively for parks and open space. Please review ordinance . 87,897 for., confirmation. 4. Estimated gross revenue is based on a price and quantity:that are not grounded in reality. The dollars are not today's dollars a. A discount rate, not an inflation rate should be used. (Macpherson even acknowledges in written correspondence to the City ..that a 7%o discount would be legitimate,) b. PRC 6826 requires drillers to obtain a permit before conducting anygeophysical or geological surveys or obtaining core samples.; None have been obtained for the Hermosa Tidelands, indicating that Macpherson's numbers are wild speculation. Nowhere in the Wilmington Torrance basin has a ,recovery of such quantities ever been made. c Macpherson's prior spreadsheets assume a 20 -year project,'with half of the.wells onshore, half offshore.. Suddenly- to suit the purposes of a`different argument, he creates a spreadsheet' that assumes a 30 year project with all the oil wells bottomed offshore. Clearly this was done to skewtheresults so as to make tidelands revenue appear more attractive. d: Again,'this spreadsheet only indicates,a gross revenue, not what Hermosa Beach will net . after handing over X amount of the tidelands revenue to the state. 5. -Macpherson makes erroneous comparisons between Hermosa. Beach and other cities' .expenditure of tidelands money, neglecting to mention that both Long Beach` and Redondo, Beach were sued for .misapplication of tidelands revenue: Given the fact that in his contract, the one exemption from paying Hermosa's litigation is. in connection with lawsuits brought against us by the state for misuse of tidelands revenue. 6. The likelihood of using whatever revenue .might be generated for additional projects is unrealistic. Surely Macpherson remembers that Hermosa Beach already hired a lobbyist to negotiate with the State Lands Commission for wider discretionary control of the tidelands revenue, and we were turned down flat: 7. --'Furthermore, the Little Hoover Commission is preparing to submit legislation that will, among other things, transfer all oversight authority for oil from the.State Lands Commission to the Division of Oil and .Gas. ' If approved, this change is likely to severely limit future options with regard to tidelands spending. ILKs V�`' RECEIVED LAWRENCE O. FORDIANI JAN 1:1 1995 ' P.O. BOX 423 REDONDO BEACH, CALIF. 90277 CITY MGR. OFFICE 310-372-1262 January 9, 1995 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254 Att: City Council of Hermosa Beach Robert Benz, Mayor Sam Y. Edgerton John Bowler Julie Oakes J. R. Reviczky Dear Council Members: I'm writing concerning the City's granting of commercial encroachment licenses, for the commercial use of public- right-a-ways. I own two properties on Hermosa Avenue that are affected by said licenses. In my two year quest with The City, in trying to.cure the negative impact, which one of the aforementioned licenses was creating; I kept hearing the words "BUDGET RESTRAINTS". In this period of time of being bounced between different City Depart- ments, I discovered that the fee for these said licenses have not been .changed in approximately 10 years. I was told verbally by Public Works that the fee will not be changed. I request the Council to review the fee schedule for the aforementioned licenses. If the Council deemed a increase was justified maybe the increased revenues could _help ease the use of the words "BUDGET RESTRAINTS" and assist in assuring said licenses do not create a negative impact on surrounding properties-, Thank you for your time in this matter. Yours very truly, Lawrence 0. Fordiani Hermosa Beach Homeowner EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Hermosa Beach Oil Development Project is an important and substantial source of revenue for the community. Estimates project royalty revenues to Hermosa in excess of One Hundred Million dollars over the life of the project. Royalties from the project could fund directly or assist in the funding of a number of projects that are currently under consideration by the City Council. These include: o Pier Renovation o Life Guards & Beach Maintenance O Police & Parking Enforcement o Access Roads & Parking Structures o Downtown Enhancement TIDELANDS ROYALTY The Tidelands were granted by the State of California to Hermosa Beach and other coastal communities for the purposes of commerce, navigation and the protection of lands within the city. Tideland royalties have long been used by other communities including Newport Beach, Long Beach and Redondo Beach for the development of their tidelands as well as for offsetting city general fund expenses. We, believe that Hermosa's tideland royalties can also be used in the same manner, to partially or completely fund a number of city services and finance capital projects important to the City's future. With .tidelands revenue, Redondo Beach was ableto purchase the land used for the Sheraton Hotel. Long Beach built and operates, on and off the tidelands,---4 convention center, olympic pool, hotel parking structures a trade center com lex access roads restaurants marinas and P P g A port facilities with at least a proportionate share of tideland funds. The Lease Agreement with the City of Hermosa Beach stipulates that tideland royalties are to be divided between the Special Tidelands Trust Fund -and the City's General Fund. Based on the experiences of Hermosa Beach's sister cities, royality revenues from the Tidelands Trust Fund can be used to finance the construction of beach access roads,, parking facilities, pier renovation and commercial facilities including the downtown enhancement. Trust Fund revenues may also be used to offset City expenses used in the tidelands. These include the cost of fire, police, life guards, health inspectors and access road maintenance now being paid out of general funds. The Tidelands royalty designated for the City's General Fund is currently limited, by ordinance, for the acquisition and maintenance of open space and parklands. This revenue source could be used to offset funds already budgeted for the construction and maintenance of City parks allowing those funds to be used for other City purposes. Moreover, once the City of Hermosa Beach has fulfilled its commitment to purchase open space and parkland, the ordinance could be amended by the voters to fund other projects. Hermosa Beach Oil Development Project 1 Tidelands ranted t i T d ds G o City of Hermosa Beach The Actgranting: to the City of Hermosa Beach the tidelands and submerbQ ed lands of the State of California was enacted July 25, 1919, and reads as follows: "Said lands shall be used by said city and by its successors, solely for the establishment, improvement and conduct of a harbor and for the establishment and. construction of bulkheads or breakwaters for the protection of lands within its boundaries, or for the protection of its harbor, and for the construction, maintenance and operation thereon of wharves, docks, piers, slips, quays, and other utilities, structures. and appliances necessary or convenient for the promotion or accommodation of commerce and navigation, and protection of the lands within said city." Tidelands Royalty Percentage Y Y g The City- shall be paid a royalty of 1821:6 for oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances obtained from the leased lands in the tidelands. The royalty shall be divided between the Special Tidelands Trust Fund and the City's General Fund as follows: A. "A share of the royalty or money equal to 37.5% to the City's General Fund, as considerationfor furnishing the drill site. B. A'share of the royalty or money equal to 62.5% to the Special Tidelands Trust Fund." Measure P -- The -The City Council submitted to the voters'an ordinance (Measure P) amending the prohibition against oil wells within the City, and to allow for the procurement of oil and gas from the City Maintenance Yard. Measure P was approved by a majority vote of the people. It allows for one drill site on the city owned Maintenance Yard. All revenues would go first toward debt retirement of the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District and, after all debt is retired, the revenue can be used to acquire, . maintain and improve open space and. parklands._ The ordinance reads as follows: "SECTION 1. General Fund revenue for which Tidelands revenue is substituted shall be : used first to reduce any. bond indebtedness resulting from ;the enactment of Community Facilities District No. 1, which District would acquire the South School Site, the Seaview Parkette, and the Railroad Right -of -Way; and, second; when the bonded indebtedness is paid, the acquisition, maintenance and improvement of available excess school or other properties for open space and parkland purposes. SECTION 2. This ordinance may be amended only by a vote of the people." Hermosa Beach Oil Development Project 2 GEOLOGY The Torrance -Wilmington oilfield is one of the largest in California. Substantial geologic and engineering information has been accumulated over the many years of its production. The north- western extension of this oilfield underlies the City of Hermosa Beach and its offshore tidelands. This portion of the oilfield has been subject to a number of geologic and develoP mental studies with the most comprehensive, completed b Hacker & Hacker in 1988. Geologic Report I According to the geologic report b Robe and u Robert N. Paul D. Hacker. re g . g � P Y (California( gistered geologist No. 443) the Hermosa Beach oil development project is capable of producing over thirty milli1 on barrels of oil. Hackerreports orts that -the Hermosa Beach prospect is located at the structurally highest art of the eP P sP Y g P prolific Belmont-Wilmington-Torrance Redondo anticline. This structure has produced over 2.4 billion barrels of oil and 1.3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. It is conservatively estimated that this prospect can contain in excess of 30 million barrels of producible oil as well as a significant amount of natural gas. The Hermosa Beach Tidelands lie at the structural apex of this prolific _ producing trend. REVENUE PROTECTIONS Royalty revenue for Hermosa Beach is projected to total one hundred million dollars over the life of the project. Revenues are to be divided between the Tidelands Trust Fund, City General Fund and the -Hermosa Beach School District: Table 1 summarizes. the, oil production and revenue projections for the project. Hermosa Beach Oil Development Project 3 'Table 1 Hermosa Beach Oil Development Project -Estimated Property Royalty Analysis 08 -Feb -95 Oil Oil Tidelands Total Year Production Value Trust Fund Drill Site School Hermosa Number Year Bbls $/Bbl Royalty Royalty Royalty Royalty. 1 1995 0 13.70 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 1996 97,395. 14.25 $161,943 $97,138 $19,479 5278,560. 3 1997 54,519 14.82 $94,277 $56,550 $10,904 4 1998 730,000 15.41 $1,312,848 $787,484 $146,000$261.731' 52,246,331: >` 5 - 1999 2,555,000 16.03 $4,778,765 $2,866,440 $511,000 6 2000 2,920,000 16.67 $5,679,904 $3,406,969 $584,000 7 . 2001 2,920,000 17.33 $5,907,100$3,543,248 $584,000 < >'" 10,034,347< 8 2002 2,628,000 18.03 $5,529,045 $3,316,480 $525,6009,371',I25< 9 2003 2,365,200 18.75 $5,175,187$3,104,225 $473,040 >: SS,752,�t52: 10 2004 2,010,420 19.50 $4,574,865 $2,744,135 $402,084 X.084'. , -: 11 2005. 1,708,857 20.28 $4,044,181 $2,425,815 $341,771$G,S1L,767` 12 2006 : 1,452,528 21.09 $3,575,055 $2,144,420 $290,506 13 '72W7 2007 1,234,649 21.93 $3,160,349 $1,895,668 $246,930 :.I .$5;302,946--- 14 2008 1,049,452 22.81 $2,793,749 $1,675,771 $209,890 <<54679410:; 15 2009.... 892,034 23.72 $2,469,674 $1,481.,381 $178,407 ... .. $4,229362 16 2010 758,229 24.67 12,183,192 $1,309,541. $151,646 17 2011 644,495 ` 25.66 $1,929,943 $19157,635 $128,899 ............ 226,476:, 18 .2012 547,820 .26.69 $1,706,067 $1,023348 $109,5(A- >>=` 838979 19 2013 465,647 27.75 $1,508,163 $904,639 $93,129 ':3::$2;SQ5;932 20 2014 395,800 28.86 $1,333,216 $799,701 $79,160 ;;;;.;:.52;212;07& ry . SUB TOTAL' 25,430,045 $57,917,521 $34,740,586 $5,086,009 $97,744,116 `r REMAINDER 1,801,305 $7,199,176 $4,318,272 $360,261 $11,877,709 TOTAL 27,231,350 $65,116,697. $39,058,858 $5,446,270 $109.621.825 (Projected 30 Year Life) Assumptions: A. Oil value in.first year is $13.70 per barrel . B. Oil value increases 4% year after. first year. P� Y Y C. Tidelands Trust Fund royalty is 11-2/3°b. D. Drill Site royalty is 7%. E. School royalty is $0.20 per barrel. F. Associated gas value of $1.20 per barrel is included in oil value G. 23 producing wells and 4 water injection wells. H. Maximum facility throughput of 8,000 barrels per day. 4 SUMMARY The Hermosa Beach Oil Development Project canrovide the community an important source P Y P of revenue. As shown in Table 1,approximately 65 million dollars in revenue may be available to finance projects and fund services for the tidelands of Hermosa Beach. The City's General Fund could receive 39 million dollars for the purchase and maintenance of parks and open space. The Hermosa Beach school system also may receive 5 million dollars over the life of the project. This project distributes significant revenue to the city of Hermosa Beach providing the city with an excellent alternative to increasing parking fees or raising utility taxes on Hermosa Beach citizens. Hermosa Beach Oil Development Project 5 Mlxe Potential Uses for Oil Royalty, - Hermosa Beach Estimated Estimate ' % Funded by Total Funded Proiect of Cost Royalty Revenue by Royalty Difference Pier Renovation $ - 3,100,000 100%. 3,100,000` $ - Parking Structures $ 6,000,000 50%o (2) $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000:. Dowivntown Enhancement $ T,072,000 25% (s) $ 1,768,000 $ 5,304,000 South Park $ 300,000 100% (4) $ .300,000 $ - Biltmore Site Park $ 75,000 100% _ (4)_$ 75,000 $ - $ 16, 547, 000 $ 8,243,000 $ 87304,000 Revenue Estimates Over Life of Project Tideland Fund Royalty $ 65,116,697 - May be used for tideland area improvements. General Fund Royalty $ 391058,858 - Use restricted (by city _vote) to acquisition and maintenance of open. space. School Royalty $ 5,446,270 Total Royalty - $ 109,621,825 (1) 100% of cost (or debt service) could be paid out of Tideland :Royalty Revenue. (2) This is an estimate, the actual percentage may be more or less than 50%- Tideland Royalty Revenue. (3) ;This is.an.estimate, the.actual number may be more or less than 25%- Tideland Royalty Revenue. (4) 100% of cost (or debt service) could be paid from General Fund Royalty Revenue. Prepared by Macpherson Oil Company ROYUSESALS 2/14195 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 1 02/06/95 16:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS .VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2515 01/19/95 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 001-1103 288,565.93 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 105-1103 5,778.31 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 109-1103 1,387.23 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 110-1103 24,760.62 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 115-1103 497.11 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 145-1103 221.30 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 146-1103 987.55 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 152-1103 79.15 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 155-1103 2,446.47 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 . 160-1103 10,294.79 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 170-1103 4,776.25 PAYROLL/1-1 TO 1-15-95 705-1103 2,367.12 342,161.83 TOTAL CHECKS 342,161.83 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH" PAGE 2 02/06/95 16:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 288,565.93 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 5,778:31 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 1,387.23 110 PARKING FUND 24 76 0.62 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 497.11 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 221.30 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 987.55 i 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 79.15 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 2,446.47 . 160 SEWER FUND 10,294.79 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 4,776.25 . 705. INSURANCE FUND 2,367.12" TOTAL 342,161.83 VOUCHRE2 CITY_OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 1 02/06/95. 17:06 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT. ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE. NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2516 01/23/95 003962 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZA UNDERGROUND TANK FEES/OCT-DEC 001-4205-4251 56.81 56.81- 2517 01/23/95 006079 BAY CITIES ROOFING REPAIR CITY HALL ROOF 001-4204-4309 800.00 800.00 TOTAL CHECKS 856.81 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 1 02/06/95 17:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2518 01/24/95 000398 POSTMASTER REPLACE CHECK #1743 110-1204-4305 2,000.00 2,000.00 2519 01/24/95 005107 OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVI'" 300' NOTICING/JAN 95 001-4101-4201 709.77 709.77 TOTAL CHECKS 2,709.77 I VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 2 02/06/95 17:22 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2521 01/25/95 000398 POSTMASTER ADD'L POSTAGE/SPRING BROCHURE 001-4601-4305 100.00 100.00 2522 01/25/95 000026 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMEN FIRE DEPT RATE CHANGE 001-2201-4180 525.19 525.19 TOTAL CHECKS 625.19 " VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 1 02/06/95 17:31 < VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER. DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2523 01/26/95 004075 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WORKERS' COMP CLAIMS/JAN 95 705-1217-4182 31,341.08 - 31,341.08 2524 01/26/95 000707 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZA SALES.TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 94 -001-2101-4306 9.00 SALES TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 94 001-2201-4309 8.00 SALES'TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 94 001-3901 70.00 - SALES TAX DUE/OCT-DEC 94 001-2101-4305 12.00 99.00 TOTAL CHECKS 31,440.08 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE I 02/06/95 17:39.` VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2525 01/30/95 004091 POSTAGE ON CALL RESETPOSTAGEMETER 001-1208-4305 2,008.00 2,008.00 2526 01/30/95 003261 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA Cl SEMINAR REG/M. SCHUBACH 001-4101-4316 50.00 50.00 TOTAL CHECKS . 2,058.00 VOUCHRE2CITY r OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 1 02/06/95 17:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2527 01/31/95 006211 R.A. SMITH JR. NOV & DEC MAINT/CTY YRD OILWLL. 001-8608-4201 300.00 300.00 2528 01/31/95 006212 CAP REMOVE WATER/CTY YRD OILWELL 001-8608-4201 180.00 180.00 2529 01/31/95 002286 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMIS REG/.BOWLER/LIVABLE COMM CONF 001-1101-4317 249.00 249.00 2530 01/31/95 000097_ POSTMASTER ANNUAL POST OFFICE BOX RENTAL 110-1204-4305 i 104.00 104.00 TOTAL CHECKS 833.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF.HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 2. 02/01/95 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR.ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER ' NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2535. 02/01/95 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS COMP MONITOR REPAIR/DEC 94 001-2101-4309 238.68 PAGER REPAIR/DEC 94 001-2201-4309 67.38 RADIO MAINT/OCT-NOV 94 001=2101-4201 4,775.00 RADIO MAINT/OCT-NOV 94 001-2201-4201 410.00 RADIO MAINT/OCT-NOV 94" 110-3302-4307 479.00 5,970.06 2536 02/01/95 005728 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MOBILE PHONE CHGS/FIRE/JAN 95 001-2201-4304 32.32 MOBILE PHONE CHGS/PW/JAN 95 001-4202-4304 105.29 137.61 2537 02/01/95 005221 ALL POINTS MAINTENANCE .FISHING PIER MAINT/DEC 94 001-3103-4201 680.00 680.00 2538 02/01/95 000857 AMERICAN STYLE FOODS PRISONER MEALS/JAN 95 001-2107-4306 179.16 179.16 2539 02/01/95 006033 ANM CONSTRUCTION FINAL RETENTION/BILTMORE SEWER 160-8408-4201 4,874.50 4,874.50 2540 02/01/95 000152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE UTILITY RAG/RUG RENTAL/DEC 94 001-2101-4309 204.44 UTILITY RAG/RUG RENTAL/DEC 94 001-2201-4309 -" 96.60 UTILITY RAG/RUG RENTAL/DEC 94 001-3104-4309 31.29 UTILITY RAG/RUG RENTAL/DEC 94 001-4204-4309 442.83 UTILITY RAG/RUG RENTAL/DEC 94 001-4205-4309 94.50 UTILITY RAG/RUG RENTAL/DEC 94 110-3302-4309 10.24 879.90 2541 02/01/95 006200 ARTS HERMOSA °FIRST NIGHT 9511 EXPENSES 109-3301-4302 3,168.98 3,168.98 2542 02/01/95 .005179 AT&T FAX MACHINE LONG DIST/DEC 94 001-2101-4304 6.35 6.35 2543 02/01/95 000407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERV/DEC 94 001-2101-4305 45.00 ; KEYS/DEC 94 110-3302-4305 1.35 46.35 2544 02/01/95 006080 BANK AMERICA RROW LEASE PAYMENT/FEB 95 126-8514-6900 .38,851.70 38,851.70 2545 02/01/95 004677 -BANK OF AMERICA, NT & S" SAFEKEEPING FEES/DEC 94 001-1141-4201 265.00 SAFEKEEPING FEES/NOVEMBER 94 - 001-1141-4201 250.00 515.00 2546 02/01/95 006209 CHERIE BATSEL ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 001-2110 50.00 ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 001-3895 8.70- 41.30 2547 02/01/95 000163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE PRISONER LAUNDRY/DEC 94' 001-2101-4306 140.40_ 140.40 2548 02/01/95 000158 .BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTR DUMP CHARGES/DECEMBER 94 001-3103-4201 3,069.57 3,069.57 2549 02/01/95 000630 BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CK FEES/22 PIER AVENUE 001-4201-4201 299.78 PLAN CK FEES/ 65 & 73 PIER 001-4201-4201 261.04 PLAN CK FEES/1150 HERMOSA AVE 001-4201-4201 93.60' PLAN CHECK FEES/22 & 39 PIER 001-4201-4201 255.32 909.74 2550 02/01/95 000602 CA PARKS AND RECREATION ANNUAL'DUES/M. ROONEY" 001-4601-4315 130.00 130.00 . 2551 02/01/95 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT STREET SWEEPING SERV/DEC 94 001-3103-4201 9,000.00 9,000.00 .2552 02/01/95 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC WATER BILLINGS/JAN 95 001-3101-4303 712.11 i VOUCHRE2 _ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 3 02/01/95 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME . DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT WATER BILLINGS/JAN 95 001-6101-4303 2,456.44 WATER BILLINGS/JAN 95 001-4204-,4303 477.21 3,645.76 2553 02/01/95 001616 CALPELRA SEMINAR REG/R. BLACKWOOD 001-1203-4316' 75.00 75.00 2554 02/01/95 006208 CHIEF SPECIAL AGENTS AS SPECIAL AGENT DIRECTORIES/P.D. 001-2101-4305 20.00 20.00 .2555 02/01/95 000153 CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/DEC 94 001-4202-4187 403.95 UNIFORM RENTAL/DEC 94 110-3302-4187 21.52 - 425.47 2556 02/01/95 000354 COAST IRRIGATION CO. IRRIGATION SUPP/COMM CTR SYS 125-8508-4309 3,821.97 3,821.97 2557 02/01/95 004715 COLEN AND LEE LIABILITY ADMIN/FEB 95 705-1209-4201 1,470.00 1,470.00 2558 02/01/95 003929 BARBARA CONKLIN REIMS BOOKS & TUITION/SPR 95 001-4202-4316 642.47 642.47' 2559 02/01/95 004981 CREATIVE JUICES TYPESET SPRING REC BROCHURE 001-4601-4302 1,066.26 1,066.26 2560 02/01/95 000642 THE DAILY BREEZE EMPLOYEE ADS/DEC 94 001-1203-4201 190.32 190.32 2561 02/01/95 006198 STEPHEN DANELIAN. REFUND RENTAL FEE/CANCELLED 001-3418 108.50 108.50 2562 02/01/95 002390 DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED." EMP PHYSICAL/N. STRATIS 001-1203-4320 224.00 224.00 2563 02/01/95 006191 CORINE 0. DAVIDSON WINTER CAMP REFUND 001-3894 35.00 35.00 2564 02/01/95 005094 DENN ENGINEERS ENGINEERING DOCS/STORM DRAINS 160-8301-4201 2,500.00 ENGINEERING SERV/BIKEWAY 115-8144-4201 600.00 3,100.00 2565 02/01/95 000154 -DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA ,SHELTER COSTS/DEC 94 001-2401-4251 96.52 96.52 2566 02/01/95 000049 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVAT SEISMIC FEES/OCT-DEC 94 001-3204 102.88 102.88 2567 02/01/95 003673 DEPARTMENT OF THE CORON TRAINING TAPE/POLICE 001-2101-4305 6.50 6.50 2568 02/01/95 000267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE/OCTOBER 94 105-2601-4251 838.48 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE/OCTOBER 94 001-3104-4251 838.47 - HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE/NOV 94 105-2601-4251 259.64 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE/NOV 94 001-3104-4251 259.64 2,196.23 2569 02/01/95 000147 THE DEVELOPMENT FILM DEVELOPING/DEC 94 .001-2101-4305 . 62.15 FILM DEVELOPING/DEC 94 001-4101-4305 8.61 70.76 2570 02/01/95 .002855 DICTAPHONE, INC. DISPATCH HEADSET CLEANING PADS 001-2101-4201 118.04 118.04 2571 02/01/95 000269 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPO POLICE COMPUTER SYS MAINT/JAN 001-2101-4201 171.47 POLICE COMPUTER SYS MAINT/JAN 001-2201-4201 114.31 285.78 2572 02/01/95 006206 BRAD DILLMAN . CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 110-3302 30.00 . 30.00 2573 02/01/95 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL FILM PURCHASES/POLICE/DEC 94 001-2101-4305 190.41 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 4 02/01/95 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT FILM PURCHASES/PUB WKS/DEC 94 001-4202-4305 131.52 321.93 2574" 02/01/95 006197 LINDA DOMINGUEZ REFUND EMPLOYEE OVERPMT/VISION 001-1202-4188 187.00 187.00 2575 02/01/95 002840 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY IBM COPIER MAINT/DEC 94 001-1208-4201 345.00 IBM COPIER USAGE/DEC 94 001-1208-4201 185.48 530.48 2576 02/01/95 002514 EASTMAN, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES/STOCK/DEC 94 001-1208-4305 959.20 959.20 2577 02/01/95 000181 EASY READER PUBLIC NOTICES/DEC 94 001-1121-4323 419.38 419.38 2578 02/01/95 .000165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO P AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 001-4201-4311 15.07 AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 110-3302-4311 116.27 AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 001-4202-4311 13.83 AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 001-4205-4311 111.31 AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 160-3102-4311 82.54 AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 001-4205-4309 323.21 AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 001-2201-4311 118.51 AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 001-3104-4311 2.15. ' AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 001-2101-4311 _ 312.77 AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 105-2601-4311 294.72 AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 001-3103-4311 200.60 AUTO PARTS PURCHASES/DEC 94 001-6101-4311 17.15 1,608.13 2579 02/01/95 005626 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. SOFTWARE MODIFICATION/FINANCE 001-1206-5402 180.00 180.00 2580 02/01/95 001400 'EFRAM MOBIL MOTORS GASOLINE/DEC 94 U01-2101-4310 97.45 97.45 2581 02/01/95 006203 WILLIAM ENGELS CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 110-3302 20.00 20.00 2582 02/01/95 006205 DENNIS ESCHELMAN CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 110-3302 20.00 20.00 2583 02/01/95 005714 EXECUTIVE IMPRESSIONS PRINT SPRING REC BROCHURE 001-4601-4302 3,247.50 3,247.50 2584 02/01/95 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES/DEC 94 001.4204-4201 _1,325.00. 1,325.00 2585 02/01/95 003169 STEVE FILLMAN CBVA TOURNEY DIRECTOR/OCT 94 001-4601-4221 484.89 484.89 2586 02/01/95 004993 FISHER SAFETY AMERICA PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES/DEC 94. 001-2201-4309 369.02 369.02 2587 02/01/95 005269 FRIDEN NEOPOST SOFTWARE/POSTAGE RATE CHANGES 001-1208-4305 189..44 189.44 . 2588 02/01/95 001432 GANDALF DATA, INC. MODEM MAINT/JUL 94 -MAR 95 001-1206-4201 1,062.00 .1,062.00 2589 02/01/95 002998 CHARLES GIARDINI COMMERCIAL INSPECTION REFUND 001-3204 43.50 43.50 2590 02/01/95 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1101-4304 19.35 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1121-4304 21.37 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1131-4304 11.31 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1132-4304 10.06 - TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1141-4304 21.96 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 5 02/01/95 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER . NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1201-4304 25.05 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1202-4304 69.49 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1203-4304 36.07 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1206-4304 165.53 TELEPHONE. CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1207-4304 33.35 TELEPHONE,CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-1208-4304 11.31 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95. 001-2101-4304 1,402.37 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-2201-4304 182.96 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-2401-4304 27.98 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 109-3301-4304 17.02 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 110-1204-4304 56.31 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 .110-3302-4304 171.88 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-4101-4304 73.69 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-4201-4304 130.40 TELEPHONE.CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-4202-4304 236.45 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-4601-4304 90.35 TELEPHONE CHARGES/DEC94-JAN 95 001-4204-4321 57.46 2,871.72 2592 02/01/95 000203 HEART FEDERAL SAVINGS & MICROFILM RECORDS STORAGE/FY95 -001-1121-4201 100.00 100.00 2593 02/01/95 002066 HERMOSA BCH CITY SCHOOL FIELD USE & MAINT/FEB 95 001-6101-4251 500.00 500.00 2594 02/01/95 000065 HERMOSA CAR WASH CITY CAR WASHES/DEC 94 001-2101-4311 204.00 CITY CAR WASHES/DEC 94 110-3302-4311 10.00 CITY CAR WASHES DEC 94 001-4601-4311 5.00 219.00 2595 02/01/95 000149 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY SOFTWARE MAINT/JAN 95 001-1206-4201 718.75 718.75 2596 02/01/95 003432 HOME DEPOT FIRE REMODEL EXPENSES/DEC 94 001-2201-5602 367.55 SKIL SAW/PUBLIC WORKS 001-4204-5401 137.48 505.03 2597 02/01/95 000679 IAPMO ADD'L DUES/C. SWARTZ 001-4201-4315 8.33 8.33 '. 2598 02/01/95 006204 DALTIER INBASTARI CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 110-3302 330.00 330.00 2599 02/01/95 006140 INSTASHRED SECURITY SER SHREDDING SERVICES/DEC 94 001-2101-4201 56.00 56.00 2600 02/01/95 000444 TEREA JOHNSON MEALS/FINGERPRINTING CLASS 001-2101-4316 32.00 32.00 2601 02/01/95 000151 L.A. CO SHERIFF'S DEPAR PRISONER BOOKING FEES/OCT 94 001-2101-4251 291.68 291.68 2602 02/01/95 004303_ LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. PARKS MAINTENANCE/DEC 94 001-6101-4201 9,093.00 9,093.00 2603 02/01/95 000167 LEARNED LUMBER. BUILDING SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-4205-4309 128.01 BUILDING SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-2401-4309 19.49 BUILDING SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-3103.4309 1 10.94 BUILDING SUPPLIES/DEC 94. 001-6101-4309 125.39 BUILDING SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-4204-4309 45.16 BUILDING SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-2201-5602 369.52 698.51 2604 02/01/95 000077 LOMITA BLUEPRINT, SERVIC DRAFTING SUPPLIES/DEC 94 125-8515-4305 142.26 J VOUCHRE2 _ - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 6 02/01/95 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK" CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT DRAFTING SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-4201-4305 16.09 158.35 2605, 02/01/95 000079 LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. FIRE UNIFORM EXPENSE/DEC 94 001-2201-4187 . 224.03 224.03 2606 02/01/95 000289 MARTIN & CHAPMAN CO. ELECTION HANDBOOK 001-1122-4305 42.90 42.90 2607 02/01/95 .003080 MERRIMAC'PETROLEUM, INC UNLEADED GASOLINE/CITY YARD 001-1401 4,786.67 .4,786.67 2608 02/01/95 003091 MODERN CURRICULUM PRESS DARE VIDEOS 001-2101-4305 353.80 353.80 2609 02/01/95 006207 SANDY MORALES CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 110.-3302 20.00 20.00 2610 02/01/95 006201 MUSEUM OF TOLERANCE TICKETS/COMM RESOURCES TRIP .' 001-4601-4201 160.00 160.00 2611 02/61/95 006210 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIA -REGISTRATION/R. BENNETT 001-1201-4316 124.00 124.00 2612 02/01/95 006035 NEW BUSINESS LISTS/OC LISTING OF NEW BUSINESSES/DEC. 001-1207-4201 50.00 50.00 2613 02/01/95 000606 ,NEW PACIFIC LUMBER CO. RROW MILE MARKER EXP/DEC 94 001-6101-4309 61.81 FIRE REMODEL EXPENSE/DEC 94 001-2201-5602 48.71 110.52 2614 02/01/95 004142 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES/COMM RES/DEC 001-4601-4305 93.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE/DEC 94 001-1202-4305 21.54 OFFICE SUPP/STOCK/DEC 94 001-1208-4305 311.94 426.79 . 2615 02/01/95 002892 OLIVER, BARR & VOSE LEGAL SERVICES/NOVEMBER 94 001-1131-4201 10,551.25 LEGAL SERVICES/NOVEMBER 94 001-1131-4201 2,762.00 13,313.25 2616 02/01/-95 006199 P.H.S. ENTERPRISES SEMINAR REGISTRATION/B. SCOTT 001-2201-4316 65.00 65.00 2617 02/01/95 000321 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPUTER HOOKUPS/JAN 95 001-2101-4304 120.55 120.55 2618 02/01/95 000519 PAK WEST JANITORIAL SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-4204-4309 522.78 522.78 2619 02/01/95 000950 JOSEPH R. PELKA ADV PENSION PAYMENT/JAN 95 001-2101-4180 2,046.06 2,046.00 2620 02/01/95 005746 KATE PITNER FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 52.50 52.50 2621 02/01/95 006194 DIANA L. QUIGLEY REFUND WINTER CAMP'FEES 001-3894 10.00 .10.00 2622 02/01/95 003282 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH WAVE COSTS/OCT-DEC 94 146-3401-4251 37,542.95 FAREBOX RECOVERY 146-3854 3,450.00- MAMA LIZ DINNER TRANSPORTATION 001-1101-4319 152.63 34,245.58 2623 02/01/95 006202 MARY LOU REINBOLD CITATION REFUND/ADMIN REVIEW 110-3302 20.00 20.00 2624 02/01/95 005379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS LEGAL SERVICES/OIL-NOVEMBER 94 001-1131-4201 92.95 92.95 ' 2625 02/01/95 001070 RIO HONDO COLLEGE TRAINING/BALVIN & TUBBS 001-2101-4316 73.00 73.00 2626 02/01/95 004061 SYLVIA ROOT MINUTES SECRETARY/JAN 17, 1995 001-4102-4201 263.46 263.46 VOUCHRE2 _. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ''PAGE 7 02/01/95 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/' CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 2627 02/01/95 003070 S.A.F.E.R.. ANNUAL DUES/L. LICKHALTER 001-2201-4315 20.00 20.00 2628 02/01/95 005817 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SOFTWARE MAINT/GEOBASE/FY 95 001-1206-4201 750.00 .750.00 2629 02/01/95 001399 SINCLAIR PAINT CO. PAINT/RROW MILE MARKERS/DEC 94 001-6101-4309 74.53 74.53 2630 02/01/9.5 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP JANITOR SUPPLIES/DEC 94 ' 001-4204-4309 56.42 PROGRAM SUPPLIES/DEC 94. 001-4601-4308 43.85 PRISONER SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-2101-4306 93.84 194.11 2631 02/01/95 004987 SMOG EXPRESS SMOG TESTING/DEC 94 001-310374311 30.00 30.00 2632 02/01/95 000614 SO BAY TRNG OFCRS DEPOS ANNUAL DUES/JULY 94 -JUNE 95 001-2201-4315 300.00 300.00 2633 02/01/95 000107 SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING/POLICE 001-2101-4201: 91.00 DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 49.00 DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 49.00- 91.00 2634 02/01/95 000018 SOUTH BAY WELDERS TANK RENTAL/DEC 94 001-3103-4309 15.50 TANK RENTAL/DEC 94. 001-3103-4309 15.50 TANK REFILLS/DEC 94 001-2201-4309 32.91 63.91 2635 02/01/95 000159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI ELECTRIC BILLS/JAN 95 001-4204-4303 8,184.92 ELECTRIC BILLS/JAN 95 001-6101-4303 2,392.74 ELECTRIC BILLS/JAN 95 001-3101-4303 166.05 ELECTRIC BILLS/JAN 95 160-3102-4303 96.53 ELECTRIC BILLS/JAN 95 105-2601-4303 307.65 ELECTRIC BILLS/JAN 95 001-3104-4303 664,.86 11,812.75 2636 02/01/95 000442 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI STREE LIGHT BILLINGS/DEC 94 105-2601-4303 11,773.02 11,773.02 2637 02/01/95 000170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS BILLINGS/DEC 94 001-4204-4303 1,221.54 1,221.54. 2638 02/01/95 000115 SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE C SWEEPING SERVICES/DEC 94 109-3301-4201 4,053.00 4,053.00 2639 02/01/95 000425 SUPERIOR MEDICAL EQUIPM PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES/JAN 95 001-2201-4309 27.00 27.00 2640 02/01/95. 004247 J. E. TALLERICO SOFTWARE CONVERSION SERV/JAN 001-1206-4201 50.00 50.00 2641 02/01/95 001009 TOM THOMPSON MILEAGE REIMB/P.O.S.T. CLASS 001-2101-4312 200.20 200.20 2642 02/01/95 000124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY REMODEL EXPENSE/DEC 94/FIRE 001-2201-5602 29.23 PLUMBING SUPP/DEC 94/PUB WKS 001-3103-4309 84.37 DISCOUNT OFFERED 001-2021 1.72 DISCOUNT TAKEN 001-2022 1.72- 113.60 2643 02/01/95 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 125-8508-4309 68.71 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-6101-4309 33.27 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-2201-5602 53.75 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-2101-4187 11.67 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 160-3102-4309 46.15 • VOUCHRE2 - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 8 02/01/95 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS . VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94. 001-3103-4309 34.65 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-4204-4309 243.77 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 110-3302-4309 51.09 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-2201-4309 40.18 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94. -- "- 001-3104-4309 150.91 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-2101-4309 77.91 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 001-4205-4309 70.90 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/DEC 94 105-2601-4309 86.70_ DISCOUNTS OFFERED 001-2021 107.74 . DISCOUNTS TAKEN 001-2022 107.74- 969.66 2644 02/01/95 000141 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY GOVERNMENT CODE UPDATES/DEC 94 001-1121-4201 489.29 PUBLICATIONS/CITY PROSECUTOR 001-1132-4305 24.90 514.19 2645 02/01/95 005129 WHITMORE, JOHNSON & BOL MED SERVICES/D. REINHARDT 705-1217-4182 172.00 172.00 2646 02/01/95 005758 :WILSON & ASSOCIATES" POLYGRAPH TESTING/POLICE 001-2101-4201 300.00 300.00 2647 02/01/95 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 001-1206-4305 64.55 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 001-1141-4305 .23 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 001-2201-5602 26.51 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 001-2101-4305 55.47 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 001-2101-4310 10.00 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 001-2201-4305 3.25 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 109-3301-4305 17.28 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 110-3302-4311 14.00 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 001-4101-4305 4.73 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 001-4202-4305, 14.01 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 001-4601-4308 28.82 REIMB PETTY CASH/12-30 TO 1-17 001-4601-4305 29.25 - REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-1101-4305 10.00 REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-1206-4309 26.79 REIMB PETTY.CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-4101-4305 50.85 REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18.T0.1-31 001-4201-4305 16.59 REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-4202-4305 21.84 REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-4601-4308 55.45 REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-2101-4316 27.30 REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-2101-4305 77.26 REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-2201-4305 4.10 - REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-2201-4316 10.00 REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-2201-4311 6.71 REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 109-3301-4305 22.78 REIMB PETTY CASH/1-18 TO 1-31 001-4102-4305 8.64 606.41 2649 02/01/95 000135 XEROX CORPORATION COPIER MAINT/OCT-DEC 94 001-4601-4201 312.50 COPIER MAINT/OCT-DEC 94 001-1208-4201 358.75 COPIER MAINT/OCT-DEC 94 001-2401-4201 103.12 - - COPIER MAINT/OCT-DEC 94 110-3302-4201 209.38 COPIER MAINT/NOV & DEC 94 001-1208-4201 731.17 1,714.92 2650 02/01/95: 004268 TRACY YATES REIMB BOOKS/SPRING 95 001-4202-4316 42.60 42.60 TOTAL CHECKS 205,197.59 VOUCHRE2 i i CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 9 02/01/95 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 95,957.97 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 13,560.21 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 7,279.06 110 PARKING FUND 1,581.04 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 600,00 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 4,032.94 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 38,851.70 -146 PROPOSITION IC FUND 34,092.95 160 SEWER FUND 7,599.72 705 INSURANCE FUND 1,642.00 TOTAL 205 197.59 7 February 9, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 14, 1995 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS February 28,1995: . Records Retention Schedule City Clerk Resolution ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street LightingDistrict Public Works Director � Resolution ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District Public Works Director = Request for 30 -day extension of temporary employees Personnel Director Recommendation to deny claims Risk Manager Text amendment to amend Section 29.5-8 of the subdivision ordinance regarding the minimum size of subdivided lots Community Dev. Director Public Hearing: Adoption of the Non -disposal Facility Element as mandated by the State through AB939 Community Dev. Director March 14, 1995 -� Special Events for 1995 Community Resources Director Renewal -of lease agreement with South Bay Coalition for the use of Room 4 in the Community Center Community Resources Director Hermosa Beach Emergency Plan Assistant. City Manager March 28,1994 Report on St. Patrick's Day Parade" Community Resources Director Uncalendared Public Hearing: Consideration of amendment to zoning ordinance to add tattoo parlors to the permitted use list for C-3 zone. Community Dev. Director Inventory of curbs, gutters& sidewalks for review in conjunction with the 17' setback issue Public Works Director " V February 14,1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 14, 1995 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Recommendation It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution relative to the Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach. The Investment Policy will comply with the Government Code which governs municipal investments in the State of California. The California Government Code provides a large menu of legally allowed public fund investment opportunities. I have attempted to tailor this investment policy to reflect the council's-investment personality. While continuing to strive for maximum return on investment funds, safety of principal is my first priority. I have requested authorization, subject to various limits as set forth in the Investment Policy, to invest in: 1. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 2. Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bonds: 3. Medium-Term Notes (MTM) 4. Bankers Acceptances 5. California State Local Agency Investment Fund 6. Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Fund 7. Repurchase Agreements 8. Federally Sponsored Agency Securities SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING AN INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY. OF HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS,,the.City Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach recommends adoption of the InvestmentPolicyattached hereto as: Exhibit "A° NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: That the Investment Policy for -the City of Hermosa Beach attached hereto as Exhibit°A" is hereby approved and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY OF FEBRUARY,,. 1995. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa.Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM; CITY ATTORNEY Page 1 r J February 7, 1995 Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the City.Council - February 144, 1995 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR _ THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Recommendation It is recommended that the council adopt the attached,resolution relative to the,Annual Statement of Investment Polic .for the City Y of Hermosa Beach for the year 1995. On January 1, 1985- the .governor. signed Chapter 1226 legislation into law requiring that local public agencies file an Annual Statement of Investment Policy. The 1995 Hermosa Beach City Treasurer's investmentpolicy will comply with the Government Code which governs municipal investments in the -State of California. The California Government Code provides a large menu of legally allowed public fund investment opportunities. I.have attempted to tailor this investment policy toyreflect the council.'s investment personality. While continuing to strive for maximum return on investment funds,` safety of principle.is.my.first priority. This year I have requested authorization to.invest in: 1. Time Certificates of Deposit` 2. U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bonds 3. Medium -Term Notes '(MTN) 4. Bankers Acceptances 5. California State Local Agency Investment Fund 6. Los Angeles County Pool Investment Fund 7. Repurchase Agreements 8. Federally Sponsored.Agency Securities ,a RESOLUTION NO. 9,5- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'HERMOSA BEACH ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL STATEMENT O INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR 1995. WHEREAS, the California State Legislature passed legislation during the 1984.session requiring the filing of an annual Statement of Investment Policy by local public agencies; and, WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California signed suc legislation into law effective January 1, 1985 (Chapter 1226); and, WHEREAS, the City Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach declares the annual Statement of Investment Policy to be as attached in Exhibit."A"; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: That an annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Hermosa Beach has been filed.by the City Treasurer for calendar year 1995 in compliance with Section 53646(A) of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY'OF FEBRUARY 1995. - y CITY OF:HERMOSA BEACH INVESTMENT POLICY I. OBJECTIVES The City of Hermosa Beach ("City") strives to maintain the level of investment of all-idle or surplus funds as near 100% as possible through the optimum operation of its cash management system. The City.has determined that its investment goals are safety, liquidity,.and yield, in that order. The City shall invest its funds in accordance with these investment goals and the provisions of California Government Code'Sections 53600 et seq. and this.Investment Policy. II. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY The `City Council has delegated the authority to invest to the.City Treasurer subject to the limitations set forth in the Investment Policy. III. DEPOSITS OF. FUNDS All moneys held by the City Treasurer, except such moneys which are at the time invested, shall be held in trust accounts or time or demand deposits in any state or national bank, savings association or federal association (as defined by California Financial Code .§ 5102),.subject to the following: A. The depository,institution must be authorized by law to accept deposits.of public funds, must have been in business in California for at least three years and must provide the City, Treasurer with copies of its annual audited financial statements. The City Treasurer shall review such financial statements, including but not limited to the."Reserve for Loan Losses" or similar item, to.evaluate the financial trend of the institution's asset base. B. The deposit shall not exceed the shareholder's equity of the depository bank or the net worth of the depository savings association or federal association, as the case may be, as such terms are defined in California, Government Code § 53638(a) and § 53638(b), respectively. C. The deposit shall be secured at all times by bonds or other obligations which are authorized by law.as security for public deposits and are of a market value at. least equal to the amount required bylaw; provided that the City'Treasurer may, when in his discretion local conditions so warrant, waive such security for the portion of the deposit which is insuredpursuant to federal law. D. Interest on the deposit shall be paid monthly. Fxhi bit „A, 950202 10649-00001 syc 1111817 1 IV.INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS A. The.City may invest in the following investment .instruments as permitted by the California Government Code: 1. United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills, or ..certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. 2. Obligations issued by banks for cooperatives, federal landbanks, federal intermediate credit banks, federal home loan banks, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority,'or.in obligations, participations., or other instruments of, or issued by, or fullT guaranteed as to principal. and interest by, the Federal National`Mortgage Association; or, in guaranteed portions of Small Business Administration notes; or in obligations, participations, or other instruments of, or issued by, a.federal agency or a United States government-sponsored enterprise. 3. Bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank, otherwise known as bankers acceptances,.which are eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System. Purchases of bankers acceptances may not exceed -270 days maturity or 40 percent of the City's idle.or surplus money which may be invested. However,. no more than five percent of such funds may be invested in the bankers acceptances of any one commercial bank. 4 Negotiable certificates of deposits issued by a nationally or state -chartered bank or a state or federal association (as defined by Section.5102 of the California Financial Code) which meets the requirements of subparagraph _A of Paragraph III. Purchases of negotiable certificates of deposit may not exceed 30 percent of the City's idle or surplus money which may be invested. For purposes of this subparagraph 4, negotiable certificates of deposits need not be.secured as required by subparagraph C of Paragraph III, but the amount so invested shall be subject to the limitations of subparagraph B of Paragraph'III. .5. Medium-term notes of a'maximum of five years maturity issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. Notes eligible for investment under this subparagraph 5 shall be rated in a rating category of "AA/Aa" or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized.rating service. Purchases of medium-term notes may not exceed 30 percent of the City's idle or surplus money which may be invested. 6. Repurchase agreements with any bank meeting the requirements of subparagraph A of.Paragraph III, with respect to 950202 10649-00001 syc 1111817 1 — 2 — any securities authorized by'this`Paragraph IV. The term "repurchase agreement" means a purchase of securities. -by the p YCity. pursuant to an agreement by which the seller will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date and for a. -specified amount and will deliver the; underlying securities to the City by book entry;, physical delivery, or by third -party custodial ;agreement. The transfer of underlying securities•�to the counterparty bank's customer book -entry account may be used for book -entry delivery. The term "counterparty" for the purposes of this subdivision, means the other party to the transaction. A counterparty bank's trust department or safekeeping department may be used for physical delivery of the underlying security. The term of repurchase agreements shall be for one year or less.. The term "securities," for purposes of repurchase under this subparagraph 6, means securities of -the same.issuer, description., issue date, and maturity. 7. The Local Agency Investment Fund ("LAIF") administered by the Treasurer of the State of California. 8.. The Los Angeles County Pooled Investment Fund. B. Moneys held.by a'trustee or fiscal agent and pledged to the payment or security of bonds or other indebtedness, or obligations under a lease, installment sale, or other agreement of the City, or certificates of participation therein maybe invested in accordance with -the statutory provisions governing the issuance of such bonds, indebtedness, or lease, installment sale, or other agreement, or to the extent not inconsistent therewith or ifthereare no specific statutory provisions, in accordance with the ordinance, resolution ,indenture, or agreement of the City providing for the issuance. C. Subject to any provision of the Investment Policy - specifying a shorter -maximum term, no investment shall be made in any security which at the time of investment has'a term remaining to maturity in excess of five. years. D. Notwithstanding the provisions of California Government Code S 53601.1, the City shall not invest in financial futures or financial option contracts. V. POLICY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING INVESTMENTS A. Safety. Safety and the minimizing of risk associated ...with investing refers,to attempts to 'reduce the.potential for. loss of principal, interest or a combination of the two. The first level of risk controls is found in state law which restricts the particular type.of investments permissible for municipalities. The second level of risk control is reduction of default risk by investing in instruments that appear to be the most creditworthy. The third level of risk control is reduction of market risk by investing in instruments that have relatively short.maturities, thereby eliminating risk of loss from a forced 950202 10649-00001 syc 1111817 1 — 3 Z sale. The City only.invests:in those instruments that are considered very safe. B. Liquidity. Liquidity refers to the ability to easily sell at anytime with a minimal risk of losing some portion of principal or interest. Liquidity is an_,important quality for an investment to have, for at any time the City may have unexpected or unusual circumstances that result in.larger disbursements than expected, and some investments may need to be sold to meet contingencies C... Yield. Yield is the potential dollar earnings an investment can provide, and also-is.sometimes described as the rate of return. The City attempts to obtain the highest yield possible when selecting an investment, provided that the criteria stated herein for 'safety and liquidity are met. D. "Prudent Investor" Standard. The City Treasurer shall - administer the deposit and investment of City funds with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then., prevailing that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use. VI. MONTHLY REPORTS The City Treasurer shall render a monthly investment report to the City Manager and.City Council showing the type of investment, date of purchase, custodian (if applicable), institution, date of maturity, amount of deposit or purchase price, current market value and rate of interest. The monthly report shall note.each and.every instance in which there has been a divergence from, or violation of, this Investment Policy or shall state that all items on the monthly report are in compliance with the Investment Policy. VII. INVESTMENT AUDITS AND INVESTMENT POLICY EVALUATION Annually, in .conjunction with, or separate from, the City's annual audit, there shall be an external audit of the City's investment program by an independent auditor.to assure compliance with the Investment Policy. The report of this audit shall be' made to the City Council: VIII INVESTING GUIDELINES: A. The City shall invest only in investments authorized by the Investment Policy. -Investments in reverse repurchase agreements, financial futures, financial option. contracts or other.derivative products are not permitted. B. A copy of the Investment Policy shall be given to*each. financial institution with which the City does business. 950202 10649-00001 syc 1111817 1 — 4 — , 3 C. Before an unfamiliar security is purchased, the City Treasurer shall research the issuer and the instrument. All contractual agreements and administrative procedures shall be completed before any transactions are consummated. D. Securities shall not be purchased on margin or via reverse repurchase agreements.(using the security. -to .be purchased as collateral) The City shall not enter into reverse repurchase agreements under any circumstances. E. Every investment transaction shall be documented and the procedure for monitoring shall be clearly defined. F. Investment strategies'shall be reviewed by the City Treasurer at least annually. G. 'Investment income shall be shared by the General Fund with restrictedfund balances on a` proportionate ratio of balances to total pooled cash and investment income shall be credited accordingly on an annual basis. H. Custody of investments in securities issued by the United States Government shall be.placed, pursuant to written custody agreements, with banks which meet the requirements of subparagraph A of Paragraph III.: IX. INTERNAL CONTROL A. Internal control for investments is the procedure established by management of the City to assist in ensuring ,as far as practicable: 1. An orderly and efficient conduct of depositing and investing City funds, including adherence to investment policies. 2. The safeguarding of assets. 3. The accuracy and completeness of the accounting records for investments. 4. The timely preparation of reliable financial information. 5 The prevention of errors 6. The detection of fraud. B. Adherence to -the use of sufficient elements of a system of internal control is the method by which a City can satisfy the objective of internal control. A list of sample elements follows: 1. Responsibility. Specific responsibility for the performance of duties.shall be assigned by the City Treasurer and 95020210649-00001 syc 11118171 -J lines of authority and `reporting ;shall be clearly identified and understood 2. Segregation of Functions. Segregation of functions reduces the risk that a person -is in a position to conceal errors or.fraud. In particular, the functions that should be considered when evaluating segregation of functions are authorization, execution, recording, and performing,reconciliations. 3. Authorization. All transactions shall be authorized by an appropriate responsible individual. The responsibilities and limits of authorization shall be clearly delineated. 4. Transfers of Funds. The transferring of investment funds shall be carried out exclusively by use.of-the Federal Reserve Bank's electronic wire transfer system. Each financial institution with which the City does business shall receive in writing from the City Treasurer a listing which limits transfers of funds to preauthorized bank accounts. The listing shall also contain the names of the City staff authorized to.request such transfers and will be updated in writing for all changes of authorized staff and bank"accounts as necessary. 5. Recording. A recording system shall be maintained which provides that the recording of transactions shall be carried out by a person other than the person executing the investment, to help assure that transactions are complete, valid, authorized and properly recorded. 950202 10649-00001 syc 1111817 1 6 — f February 1, 1995. -Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach. City Council February 14, 1995 RECOMMENDATION TO DENY CLAIMS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council deny the following claims and refer to the City's. Liability Claims Administrator. 1. The following six claims are a result of the January 4, 1995 storm which caused flooding at 414 -2nd Street (apartment garage area). a. Claimant Alario, Chantal A. - Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed 01/26/95 Allegation . :. Claimant alleges City action (sand bagging. on 8th ,St. diverted water), caused flooding of garage. b. Claimant Cantor, Robert J. Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed : 01/09/95 - Allegation. : Claimant alleges City action caused flow of water to be diverted and flood underground parking. (Same. as a.) C. Claimant Orick, Holli Date of Loss: 01/05/95 Date Filed : 01/09/95 Allegation : Claimant alleges City action caused 2nd Street to overflow due to wood chips from running path plugging drain. d. Claimant Willhite, Richard Date of Loss: '01/04/95 Date Filed 02/01/95 Allegation : Claimant alleges storm drain stopped up and water, and wood chips from City -owned land on Valley Dr. caused garage to flood. e. Claimant Clark, Elizabeth C. Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed 02/01/95 Allegation, Same as D. f. Claimant Knapick, Michael Date of Loss: 01/04/95 Date Filed 02/01195 Allegation Same as E. 2. _ Claimant Brill; Charles J. Date of Loss: 01/02/95, Date 18 Filed 01 e 01/18/95 Allegation Claimant alleges storm drain was not cleared prior to rain on 01/02/95 causing storm drain to back up and flood garage -at #16 Strand. 3. Claimant Marshall, Winston Date of Loss: 07/04/94 . Date Filed 01/03/95 Allegation Claimant alleges while roller blading, his wheel caught in.a .large crack at 2800 block the Strand causing him to fall and break ankle. A copy of the claims is available in the Office of the City Clerk for review. Respectfully Submitted, _ Concur: Robert A. Blackwood Stephen Burrell Risk Manager City Manager cc: Bill Fuentes, Colen & Lee mw/deny.. MAIL TO:. .-,City Clerk..:.... -..._. ._.:.. COPIES TO: City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive ._. Hermosa Beach; CA 90254 1. Claims for death, injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later than six (6) months after the occurrenc (Gov.. Code, Sec. 911.2):. 2' 'Claims for damages to reaF property must be filed not later than one r e occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec.911.2 3. Head entire claim before filing.- tg t.. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. �.� ..,.r•r• x• NameotClaimant `last,' first, middle): Age ALARIO CHAM. L., AMINTA- ` 23 Home Address of Claimant (Street. Clty, State, Tip) ~' Telephone No. 2602 PALM DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA � (310) 376y29_3. /•, Business Address of Claimant (Street. City; State, Tip) aviv nt He-mosw � Telephone No. N/A _... .. _. (. ) ddress to wmcn you desire notices or communications to be sant regarding this ctalm: % r. r2 2602 PALM DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Date of DamagerLossllnjury Time JANUARY 4. 199.5_. _ _ A.M. 4:00= - P -M.' Place of Damage/Lossllnjury PARKING GARAGE, GALLEY APARTMENTS 414 SECOND STREET HERMOSA BEACH How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) WOODCHIP FROM GREENBELT CLOGGED VALLEY SEWERS. 8TH STREET BLOCK OFF BY CITY. THIS ACTION CAUSED FLOODING OF GARAGE AT 414 SECOND STREET Were Police at scene? Yes ❑ No(9 Report No. Were Paramedics at scene? Yes ❑ NoCN - What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury? SAND BAGS PLACED AT 8TH STREET CAUSED EXCES WATER/FLOODING ON SECOND STREET Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: UNKNOWN Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss: M less than S10,000.00 If so, state the amount $1,696.71 ❑ more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jurisdiction. 0 more than 510,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estirr RENTAL CAR $791.71 AUTO INSURANCE DEDUTIBLE $500.00 REPLACEMENT COST - DAMAGED $405.00 - SLI\JVI,l1L VLLVI\U 11�VJ - _ Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). 1/18/95 RENTAL CAR $791.71 THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON. REVERSE SIDE. 1. Claims for death; injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later than six (6) months after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). .2 Claims for damages to reat•property must be filed riot later than one (1) year after the occurrence (Gov. Code, 5ec.911.2). 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets. if necessary, to give full details. Name of Claimant : !,last $" fir t I lddle) - d a e✓ -Age 3q Home Address of Claimant (Street.. City, State, p) klt,I S eco-, J S4V�e- ezc C4 O "Z 5--'"l Telephone No. (-3-/J)I99U/ Business Address of Claimant (Street. City; State, Zip) J Telephone No. Address to cn you sire notices or commumcauons.to be sent regaromg this claim: Da(te� of Damage/Losslinjury `� `7 all V ( A.M. Tana . Place of amagelLosslinjury %/ ) U h �P v c Yd V-1 Gu ✓ cc (� �i{ Y k in, 5-P 1 How did damage/losslinjury occur? (Be specific) p� c 4-e Cil `J 01 #ey-J-7d S /� PSG- -q C4ic-L7) %�v��� l Were Police at scene? Yes O I" Were. Paramedics at scene? Yes C N� Report No. _ J What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury? K " / Z. lJ zi-�- L% l /'� C' C' (�-•P ✓ V 'rV i �-P •� �ee L� .. / r l'71 e1-fe '� l �7 eY Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss:. /l- Xless than $10,000.00 If so, state the amount So O more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court.Jurisdicti n) . ❑ more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction)14�/� �f,(? 7 How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimal C��u r' Gam% I� (� / �' -l('�j Jul Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). o / 14 THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. CLAIM NO � DEPARTMENT CODE:. _310Z A. CITY._CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY ..MAIL TO: . City Clerk _.. COPIES' T0: . City of Hermosa Beach'rfj� '1315 Valley Drive Iiermosa Beach; CA 90254 pFRg 1. Claims for heath: crNas injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later than six {6j after the, occurren( (Gov. Code. Sec. 911.2). �p�� 2 Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than -one (i) year after the occurrence (Gov. fvcde, Sec.911.,' 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. Nameof Claimant '% last,,- first, Middle) Age dome Address of Claimant (Street. City. State. Zip) [ .�Y /1F0`are� 1 - Sec tr1 c� 9az-i Telephone No. t 310, %98-� Business Address of Claimant (Street, City; State, Zip) Telephone No. Address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: Da to of DamagelLoss/Injury (,jR Tsn A.M. _ P.M. Place of DamagelLossllnjury � � _` '�r �. • _ . How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) Were Police at scene? Yes No❑ Were Paramedics at scene? I`A Yes ❑ NoC Report No. What particularact or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury? WAM�D `I,t�b� ►� Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss Cir/less than S10,000.00 If so, state the amount ❑ more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jurisdictior ❑ more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was.amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estirr Expenditures made because of: damage/loss/injury (Date and Item) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. Name and address of witness(es), doctor(s), and hospital(s): �i�U�{.: Vr� C' 2Y1(JL (�� 5a�f A&PE, I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING CLAIM AND KNOW THE CONTENTS THEREOF: AND CERTIFY THAT THE SAME 1S TRUE OF OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS TO THOSE MATTERS WHICH ARE HEREIN STATED UPON MY INFORMATION AND BELIEF: AS TO THOSE.MATTERS 1 BELIEVE IT TO BE TRUE. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS T AND CORRECT. Dated Si d t NOTE: PRESENTATION OF A FALSECLAIMIS PUNISHABLE AS A FELONY (CAL. PEN. CODE 72). CLAIM NO.: - DEPARTMENT CODE: UABILITY - 77L!7��7ZN r t. C1TY,CLA1fREPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS ORP ERTY • +. MAIL TO: -_ City Clerk - : _ COPIES TO: " �_. .__.::--��- City of Hermosa Beach FE5aMT • _1315 Valley' Drive y, ' Iiermosa Beach; CA 90254 1. Claims for death. injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later than six (6) m ' (t after the oc (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). ' .2 Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than :one (1) year after the. occurrence (Gov. Code;'_ ec.911: 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4.. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. Name of Claimant ',last.,- flrSt ,.. Middle) Age Home Address of Claimant (Street. City. State, Zip) Telephone No. A&_�en Susm ss Address of Claimant(StreeL City; State Tip)Telephone No. i_� 0 C Address to wn yo%peslre noticSs or communications to be sent regaroi g this claim: - •• 9 iV,0721f Date of DamageJLosslinjury Time ',J,4 AL A.M. c� +2?Z P.M. Place of DamagelLoss/Injury ar ,t1n How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific)al� �.G?� ��}0�f AJ,', Were Police at scene?Yes No❑ Were Paramedics at scene? Yes C No❑ Report No. - What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury? _ 42 -4 I -,U Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss: ® less than $10,000.00 If so, state the amount / `�� ` � ---� more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jucisdictior O more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estin Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Ilem). /�/ Z4tJ1 THIS CLAIM MUST BE -SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. CLAIM NO.i DEPARTMENT CODE:DE 1'L Z Cb CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PRO t MAIL T0: City Clerk COPIES TO: City of Hermosa Beach F�: • �, 1315 ley ve iermosa1Beachr1CA 90254 FEB011993 "- t'". 1. Claims for death, injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later than six (6)1, anttf-4y!a eT`{f 1688 rrehce (Gov. Code. Sec. 911.2). 2.. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one (1) year after the occurrence r3v� odetg 2), 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. Name of Claimant last.,- first Middle) Age Home Address of CJaimaht (Street. City, State, Zip) Telephone No. (3/o) Business Address of Claimant (Street, City. State, Zip) Telephone No. Address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: Date of DamageJLosslinjury Time -r 11 c< A.M. P.M. Place of DamZqakossilnjury How did damagellosslinjury occur? (Be specific) it .0,50 7Z r Were Police at scene? Yes l�g/ No❑ ---_ Report No. n r� Were Paramedics at scene? Yes ❑ Nom What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damagellosslinjury?���;le� LP, Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: ,, wl-2 Z/7 Dc.J n Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss:. 'less than $10,000.00 If so, state the amoun 00 ❑ more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jurisdiction) ❑ more than 510,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bilis, wage rate, .repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estima e14r r lr ou G to >1 % Expenditures. made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). — �cr L THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. V CLAIM NO.: DEPARTMENT CODE: i - �ID7 LIABILITY - CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL. PERSONS ORP MAIL TO: City Clerk COPIES TO: y _ t:= City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive � � FEB011999 • Hermosa . Beach; CA 90254 cft k 1. Claims for death, injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later than six (6) (A nths after the occu� e (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). y 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one (1).year after the occurrent 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. NameotClaimant `last,' first, middle) Home Address of Claimant (Street. City, State, Zip) 414 Seco to St, *VF3 u H �,t���so� `8 C Business Address of Claimant (Street. City, State, Zip) Address to whien you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: Age 2- 'A Telephone No. f3io)3lt3•.ro�27 Telephone No. Date of DamiagerLossnnjury .l av►uo_Y` (� Time A.M. P.M. 4z 00 Place of Damagelloss/lniury - l ltr tr►,t,e i +,S- 5 d S� rze e.r n t os�.�c t� C r4 02s4 wacgAe J, How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) PA1 &I 610L4MeA 'lite_ _1trz_J 0tV1-13Y1 S L`sa US�Ka i' U1laOMA c 3aS"t Q *c5 �IatA Were Police at scene? Yes 1K No(] = —_ Were Paramedics at scene? Yes C No% --Report No. k2ol What.particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury? MafiKW!Vvk_ `die- ai)au n6AP_S-M.t t.u�YlGivtc. t,u4t�tt laytc�S r.,�iyw-lo(ocJ�r-c� �,V?.�cvtS . IJ Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss: less than 510,000.00 If so, state the amount 4 5(00 0 more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jurisdiction) .. ❑ more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be' specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimates. Expenditures made because 'of damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). ' }I 91,2.. 22. 17)ZC>a Q THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. Expenditures made because of damage/loss/injury (Date and item). d2sd-� J 1; �e-�� cl��50�� S-i� Name arid 'address of witness(es), doctor(s), and hospital(s): #3,5b PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY. ..—For all vehicle damage claims, draw a diagram with the names of streets, and indicate place of incident by'X' and by show- ing �- - - ing -house numbers or distances to street corners. r :......_ If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter 'A' location of City Vehicle and by '13' location of yourself oryourvehicle. If Personal or..property damage claim please identify location as completely as possible. NIOTE: PRESENTATION OF A FALSE CLAIM IS PUNISHABLE AS A FELONY (CAL. PEN. CODE 72). CLAIM NO.: DEPARTMENT CODE: 3102- UAaILITY ....:.... . •'� CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY MAIL TO:. City Clerk COPIES TO: City of Hermosa Beach It/ 1315 Valley Drive Iiermosa Beach; CA 90254 IGO .1 1. Claims for death, injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later than six (6) motif , fter the occurrence (Gov. Code. Seca 911.2). 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one'(1) year after the occurrence (Gov. Code,�c.911.2). 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. Name of Claimant as t- first , middle) 'Age �� \LL Gtncx.cles 31• 35- 5Home Home.Address of Claimant (Street. City, State, Zip) Telephone No. 116 Tttf SAND 4e fw.a - (3w j anti -1 Business Address of Claimant (Street. City, State, Zip) ietepraaa No. . -7 dress Address to which you desire. notices or communications to be sent regarding. this claim:- c� -n-t.-� srl?�I p • Date of Damage/Losslinjury t;.A V -6q /v► Time J J-I\i'J z "jr A.M. P.M. Place of Damage/Loss/Injury l Ttt�_ S "t7ZMi13 How did damage/loss/injury occur? (Be specific) wKla(L- F10002-0 Ir11V 6-AILi-6aS Were Police at scene? Yes L3 No❑ UwE-N`s✓r� _ Were Paramedics at scene? Yes ❑ NoCi"' Report No. What particular act or omission do you claim caused the damage/loss/injury? Q &.11liy NOT G L %R-1ZJS jC Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: ufv KAc,.vn , Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or, loss: 12(less than $10,000.00 If so, state the amount s 20 ❑ more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jurisdiction) . ❑ more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor -bills, wage rate repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estima eYl}'r� SU CeQr—(-%e5 JW,c,c! Jrl '/ el6L u'rr�S T c✓ /C..�CiLi - f Ct � cltMtr,�{� 20•��t' wjli rv.Jc1 tf44e- tyc, . Sa-irf �zt cyo �V,ca L 77� Expenditures made because of .damage/loss/injury (Date and Item). No' Cf•ttfLGfZ t� U 7 S lrp,_p fR�Gftit/ i�1 "T av��nrL-Pr�� c�rrrfiti m�,� off; . - THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. I HAVE READ THE FOREGOING CLAIM AND KNOW. THE CONTENTS THEREOF: AND CERTIFY THAT THE SAME IS TRUE OF OWN KNOWLEDGE EXCEPT AS TO THOSE MATTERSWHICH' ARE HEREIN STATED UPON MY INFORMATION AND BELIEF: AN AS TO THOSE MATTERS I BELIEVE IT TO BE TRUE. 1 DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT.THE FOREGOING IS TRL AND CORRECT. Dated t 6 Signed NOTE: PRESENTATION OF'A FALSE CLAIM IS PUNISHABLE AS A FELONY (CAL. PEN. CODE 72). NO. DEPARTMENT CODE: LIABILITY', , .. _.. � jam` II L -CITY CLAIM REPORTING FORM FOR ALL PERSONS OR PROPERTY MAIL TO:.: City City ofHrk.ermosaBeach I_... COPIES TO: �i�i,ENED 1315 Valley Drive t c30 Iiermosa Beach, CA 90254 1. Claims for death. injury to persons, or to personal property, must be filed not later than six (6) mo WWEUR1F @SR1nc (Gov. Code. Sec. 911.2). 2. Claims for damages to real property must be filed not later than one (1) year after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec.911.2 3. Read entire claim before filing. 4. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give ,full details. Name of Claimant 'last, first, middle) / : Age Home Address of Claimant (Street, City. State. Zip) Telephone No. 360 334 P4�e - 1f ZS 1310 )3ZL'l: Business Address of Claimant (Street, City, State, Zip) Telephone No. �`DC? i3,d) Z-1 Address to winch you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: lG� C� 6?d 2 S¢ Date of Damage/Lossrinlury Time �!/ G A.M. P.M. Place of Damage/Lossllniury How did damage/loss/i,-Ijury occur? (Be specific) /f � �c ��✓ Were Police at scene? Yes)6 NO❑ Report No. Were Paramedics at scene? Yes,l NOO —" - - r �P� �_ - What particular act or omission ado you claim caused tthfe�damagelloss/injury? PKAOO PKI)ZE GA.)7W f— `AVL Name of City employee(s) causing the damage/loss/injury: Is the total amount of your claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss: less than 510,000.00 If so, state the amount - O more than $25,000.00 (Superior Court Jurisdiction) O more than $10,000.00 but less than $25,000.00 (Municipal Court Jurisdiction) How was amount of claim computed? (Be specific. List doctor bills, wage rate, repair estimates, etc.). Please attach two (2) estimz awl Expenditures made becaf d/loss/injury ( ate and Item). D/� ��/w✓i��� THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. use oamage THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE. a February 2, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of _ City. Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February. 14, 1995 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 95-57 6AUTHORIZ/NG THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AS THE DESIGNATED AGENT FOR ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO FEDERAL AND STATE DISASTER ASSISTANCE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 95- authorizing the Finance Director as the designated agent for all matters pertaining to federal and state disaster assistance, in order for the City to recover costs associated with the Winter Storms 1995: Background: On Thursday, January 26, 1995, a City representative attended a.. FEMA briefing to determine what type of storm related activities would be reimbursable. A Notice of Interest was filed with FEMA to indicate that the City likely has reimbursable costs. Analysis: Adoption of the attached resolution (in the format provided by OES) is required prior to submission of claims. The Finance Department is gathering the information required for preparation of a claim to recover all eligible City costs. Respectfully submitted: CO CUR: Viki Copeland, Step;*n R. Burrell, Finance Director City Manager FEMASSTIRLAt RESOLUTION NO. 95 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AS DESIGNATED AGENT TO PROVIDE, TO THE STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES, FOR ALL MATTERS- PERTAINING TO SUCH STATE DISASTER ASSISTANCE, THE ASSURANCES AND AGREEMENTS REQUIRED BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Viki Copeland, Finance Director, is hereby authorized t execute for and in behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, this application and to file i in the Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance- under P.L.. 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance 'Act for the Winter Storms 1995 which occurred i January of 1995. SECTION 2. That the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, hereby authorizes its agent to provide, to the State Office of Emergency Services, for,all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance, the assurances and agreements required. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 1995. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR Of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY FEMARESO/FILM Page 1 January 30, 1995 Honorable mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 14, 1995 CERTIFICATION OF ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 95- a resolution of the City of Hermosa Beach, certifying the engineering and traffic survey which sets speed limits on Pacific Coast Highway and Artesia Boulevard. Caltrans speed surveys on, Pacific Coast Highway and Artesia Boulevard within the City limits of Hermosa Beach expired on November 1994. Caltrans has not yet upgraded their surveys to date and enforcement on these streets cannot be accomplished using radar techniques. Discussion: Statutes in the California Motor Vehicle Code require that governmental agencies periodically review and .update posted speed limits. The periodic updates are required every five years in order that the City's enforcement agency may, enforce said speed limits with radar. The study process involves a review of existing posted speed limits for their adequacy in terms of adjacent land uses, traffic demands, roadway q Y 1 conditions, continuity of speed limits, reported accidents and field surveys of motorists driving patterns and habits. Caltrans is responsible for establishing speed limits on the streets and highways under their jurisdiction. Their. last survey on PCH:and Artesia boulevard was done in November 1989. five Year requirements has passed and Caltrans has yet to conduct, a new survey. Hermosa Beach Police cannot legally enforce the existing limits .on these two major highways in our City. - The city traffic Engineer conducted speed surveys on PCH and Artesia Boulevard in late 1994 and early 1995 in order to update the. Caltrans, surveys and allow our Police to enforce the limits. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 95- 3 ARESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC .4 SURVEY 5 .s WHEREAS, enforcement of speed limits by radar must be justified by an 7 engineering and traffic survey; $ WHEREAS, Section 40802 of.the California Vehicle code requires an 9 engineering and traffic.speed survey to be performed every five years; 10 WHEREAS, the last survey was presented to City. Council on November 11 12. 23, 1993; and 13 WHEREAS, this survey of Pacific Coast Highway and Artesia Boulevard 14 was prepared by a licensed traffic engineer and completed in January 1995 in 15 accordance with the State of California Vehicle Code and Traffic Manual -1s NOW, THEREFORE, THE CIT`( COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA 17. BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 18 SECTION1. To certify the attached engineering and traffic survey of - 19 20 Pacific Coast. Highway and Artesia Boulevard. 21 SECTION 2. Direct that a copy of the resolution and attached 22 engineering and traffic survey be forwarded to. the presiding judge of the South 23 Bay Municipal. Court. .24 25 . - - 26 . 27 28 , TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN The City of Hermosa Beach completed an Engineering and traffic Survey of Pacific Coast Highway and Artesia Boulevard on January 5, 1995 because the State Department of Transportation speed surveys had expired. One (1) copy of this survey will be given to the- presiding judge of the South Bay Municipal Court in Torrance. One (1) copy will be presented to the City of Hermosa Beach prosecutor. Two (2) copies will be provided to the Hermosa Beach Police Department of which one (1) copy will always be available in the records Bureau. The original of the survey will be kept in a secure place in the Public Works Department for review by any persons needing to view the survey. J, Amy Amirani, a representative of the City of Hermosa Beach Public, Works Department, do hereby certify that Pacific Coast Highway has been properly surveyed and that all the facts of the survey are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. t a Amy Am rani Director of Public Works City of Hermosa Beach January 30, 1995 ertraf I, Edward J. Ruzak, do hereby certify that I am a registered Civil Engineer and Registered Traffic Engineer, licensed in the State of California (RCE 18824; RTE 0202). I conducted the engineering and traffic survey of Pacific Coast Highway and Artesia Boulevard in the City of Hermosa Beach. This survey was prepared by me and the contents are a true and accurate portrayal of the facts. .. January 30, 1995 Edward J. Ruz ka RCE'`18824 Date City Traffic Engineer, RTE 0202 I, Elaine Doerfling, do hereby certify that I am the City Clerk for the City of Hermosa Beach. I hereby certify that the enclosed Speed Resolution was adopted by the City Council on February 14, 1995. Elaine Doerfling Date City Clerk ertraf2 Page 1 Vehicle Speed Survey Performed under the direction of Ed Ruzak Vehicle Speed Survey Data P Y Location: PCH between Artesia & Pier Direction: Both County/City: L.A./ Hermosa Beach Speed limit: 35 mph Reason: Speed Limit Study Weather: Clear Recorder: Craig Schneider Date: 12/5/94 Begin Time: 10:00 AM End Time: 10:40 AM Data Entry.: Craig Schneider Calibration Times: 10:00 AM, 10:40 AM Vehicle Speed Survey Results Total number of vehicles: 200 Average speed: 40.4 mph 85th percentile speed: 45 mph Pacer 36 mph 45 mph Speed limit: 35 mph Percentage exceeding ..speed limit: 79.0 Page 1 Page 2 Data and Calculations Speed Number of Percent Cumulative (MPH) Vehicles of Total Percentage 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 i 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 1 0.5 0.5 29 1 0.5 1.0 30 2 - 1.0 2.0 31 3 1.5 3.5 32 6 3.0 6.5 33 2 1.0 7.5 34 3 1.5 9.0 35 14 7.0 16.0 36 10 5.0 21.0 37 18 9.0 30:0 38 13 6.5 36.5 39 23 11.5 48.0 40 15 7.5 55.5 41 10 5.0 60.5 42 13 6.5 67.0 43 17 8.5 75.5 44 7 3.5 79.0 45 14 7.0 86.0 46 6 3.0 89.0 47 3 1.5 90.5 48 4 2.0 92.5 49 4 2:0 94.5 50 5 2.5 97.0 51 0 0.0 - 97.0 52 1 0.5 97.5 53 1 0.5 98.0 . 54 2 1.0 99.0 _ 55 2 1.0 100.0 56 0 0.0 100.0 57 0 0.0 100.0 58 0 0.0 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 Page 2 January 30, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of Y 9 g the Hermosa Beach City Council February 14, 1995 APPROVAL OF SIDEWALK /HANDICAP RAMPS CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS FOR FUNDS TDA ARTICLE 3 FUNDS FOR FY 1995 -'96 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council 1. Approve and adopt Resolution No. 95- ,a resolution of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. A. Approving the application for TDA -Article 3 funds for the construction of sidewalk/handicap ramps at various locations in the City. Background: The purpose of this project is to construct sidewalk/handicap ramps.at various locations as needed. The construction of the sidewalk/handicap ramps will be in connection with Street Rehabilitation (CIP 94-141 and 94-149) of Monterey Boulevard. and Hermosa Avenue Project. There is an opportunity to receive funds in an amount of $7,344 to fund a portion of the _ construction cost of sidewalk/handicap ramps project to comply with the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) through Transportation Development agency (TDA), Article 3 discretionary funds. Analysis: TDA Article 3 discretionary funds will be available County -wide for bikeway and pedestrian projects of regional significance. These local funds will be allocated at the discretion of the Commission for new construction, pedestrian facilities, or for off-street bikeway maintenance. Such discretionary funds allocated to new facilities must be spent within two years of allocation, unless a one year extension is granted by Metropolitan Transportation authority. Fiscal Impact: None at this time, as no funds are being expended. This is an application for funding. 1. 1 RESOLUTION NO.95 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUNDS UNDER SB 821 AND APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF ITS BICYCLE AND/OR 4 PEDESTRIAN PLAN. 5 6 WHEREAS, SB 821 provides that 2% of each county's total local Transportation ' 7 Fund be annually set aside and used to fund the development of bicycle and pedestrian s facilities; and s 10 WHEREAS, THE City of Hermosa Beach desires to construct and maintain 11 handicap ramps within their city utilizing, in part, the funds available under SB 821. '. 12 NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does resolve. 13 14, as follows: 15 1. To adopt construction of handicap ramps in conformance with the Americans with 16 Disability Act; 17 18 2. To authorize the Director of Public Works as the City's authorized signature and 19 designated contact person; 20 3. -To apply for all funds available to the City of Hermosa Beach allocated for 21 22 Bikeways and Pedestrian facilities (SB 821(; 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 4. To maintain, or cause to be maintained in safe condition, all facilities whose construction is wholly or partially funded by the requested allocation of SB 821 funds. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 1995 January 31, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 14, 1995 Undergrounding of Offsite Utilities and Onsite Security Lighting South Park Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Appropriate Lighting and Landscape District Funds in the amount of $11,394.76 to underground the street lights on Valley Drive between 2nd and 6th Streets. 2. Appropriate Lighting and Landscape District Funds in the amount of $40,000 to the South Park. Project (CIP 94-515) to install security lighting within South Park. Background: The City Council, at their meeting of December 6, 1994, awarded the construction contract for Phase I of the South Park Project. Work commenced on January 4, 1995 and has progressed smoothly with much of the demolition, removal, grading, and retaining wall construction having been completed. Work is scheduled to begin on the construction of the deceleration lane and parking lot along Valley Drive next week: An updated construction schedule is attached for City Council's information. Of course this time frame is contingent upon the weather remaining fair. Analysis: There presently exist street lights along Valley Drive which fronts South Park that are served overhead. As it is City policy to have new developments underground utilities adjacent to their property it would be fair for the City to abide by their own rules and have this street light system undergrounded. The cost to have Southern California Edison undergound the 600' of electrical service and install 2 new light poles and fixtures will be $ 11,394.76.( see attached invoice) One oI themajor concerns about the South Park development as expressed by neighboring residents and the Police Department is the deficiency of lighting within the park. While work in Phase I does include the installation of electrical conduit for the security lighting, the light poles, fixtures and wiring were to be included in the Phase II improvements. The cost per the contractors bid to include the 28. fixture security lighting system in Phase I is $40,000: Theiristallation"of security lighting will discourage vagrancy'arid loitering and increase public safety and peace of mind. . Fiscal Impact: The cost to underground offsite utilities and install security lighting within South Park is $51,394.76. Lighting and Landscape District funds of $898,254 are available for street and area lighting throughout the City. The fund balance would be reduced to $846,859.24. Respectfully submitted, - Concur: ti ,-,�,-oseph C. Mankawich Amy�Amirarii CaLal Improvement Program Engineer Director of Public Works Advanced Construction Co. City of Hermosa Beach South School Park Improvements ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr may Jun 4 Ill 1181251 1 1 8 115 122 129 1 5 112 119 126 1 5 1121191261 2 1 9 116 123 130 1 7 114121 1281 4 Ill 118 1 Bid Opening Id ' 12/8/94 1218/94 2 Bid Award Id 12/13/94 12/13/94 3 Pre construction meeting 1d 12/22/94 12/22/94 4 Bonds & insurance submittal 10d 12/14/94 12/27/94 5 Notice to Proceed 1d 1/4/95 1/4/95 6 Mobilization 15d 1/4195 1/24/95 7 Demolition 29d 1/5/95 2/14/95 8 . Earthwork 27d 1/16/95 2/21./95 9 Deceleration lane 25d 2/6/95 3/10/95 10 Lower parking lot 21d 2/22/95 3/22195 11 Electrical 26d 2/17/95. 3/24/95 12 Retaining wall 23d 2/1/95 313/95 13 PCC Works 16d 3/22/95 4/12195 14 Irrigation 17d 3/27/95 4/18/95 15 A/C Hard Court 6d 4/17/95 4/24/95 16 Soil Prep & Fine grading 9d 4/17/95 4/27/95 17 Landscaping 11 d 4124/95 5/8/95 18 Punch list 1 d 5/9/95 5/9/95 19 Notice of completion Id 5/10/95 5/10/95 20 Project Closeout 30d 5/11/95 6/21/95 Project: CIP 92-515 Date: 2/6/95 Task Summary Rolled Up Progress - - Progress Rolled Up Task Milestone Rolled Up Milestone Q Track It Monitoring Systems, Inc. - _ = Southern- California'. Edison Company - - P. O. BOX 2944 _ .505 MAPLE AVENUE - - January 23 j '1995 - -TORRANCE,.CALIFORNIA 90509' SALES INVOICE : NAME-.-- CITY—_F -HERMOSA- PROJECT LOCATION: VALLEY/6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 PLEASE MAIL PAYMENT TO: - -a SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. - _ ATTN• JIM SOUKUP -------- --- — .BOX - --- - P.O. 2944 . TORRANCE,` CA 90509 - - - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RELOCATE AT CITY'S EXPENSE - - AND REQUEST _- All prices are applicable for a period of 90 days" _ - - from.this date and are subject to change thereafter.*- hereafter. - --------------------- - CUSTOMER INVOICE INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SCE ACCOUNTING. - 1_42.110 = $ 388.02 NON-REFUNDABLE .. 142.130 = $. 8,21-3:98 Relocation Advance $ 11,394.76 253.930 = $ 2,792.76 TOTAL = $ 11,394.76 -------------- PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT $ 11,394.76 - } _. t'TOTAL ------------ SCE PROJECT NUMBER: 6744-6799, J6701 C..W.0.#_ C.J.O.# Name: CITY OF HERMOSA - Prj Loc VALLEY/6TH STREET._ HERMOSA BEACH, CA 9025: Southern. California Edison Company P. O. BOX 2944 505 MAPLE AVENUE TORRANCE. CALIFORNIA 90509 January 23, 1995 CITY OF HERMOSA 1315 VALLEY DRIVE. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 - Subject: SCE Project Number: 6744-6799, J6701 Project-location: VALLEY/6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Thank you-for the opportunity to assist you with your electrical needs.- The information provided below indicates requirements needed to complete your project. Please read and follow the directions so.that your project may be'completed in a timely manner. o Enclosed are two copies of our invoice.. Return one copy of the invoice with your payment. Please return the documents and/or payment in the enclosed self-addressed envelope. After receipt of the required documents, your project will be scheduled for construction. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at (310)783-9342. SinVCUO ly, P Service Planner Enclosures February 6, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council February 14, 1995 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 94-6 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO REDUCE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTERS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation To introduce the attached ordinance to reduce the parking requirement for gymnasiums/physical fitness centers. Background At the meeting of May 24, 1994, the City -Council directed staff to study amending Section : 1152(e) #11 to reduce the parking requirement for gymnasiums/health and fitness centers. The issue was discussed in connection with the comprehensive study of uses that require C.U.P's in which it was also recommended to remove the C.U.P. requirement for 1 : nasiums/health"and fitness centers.. i .Currently, the parking requirement is as follows: 1 space for each 50, square feet of gross floor area for facilities offering exercise, fitness, or aerobic dance classes, or I space for each 100 square feet of grossfloor area for gymnasiums type weight lifting and weight training activities. At their meeting of December 6, 1994 the Planning Commission recommended the changes as suggested by staff which would reduce parking requirements, and establish different parking requirements for small/moderate_sized facilities and large facilities: For further background please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report. Analysis The current parking standard established in 1990 was based on a comparison with other South Bay Cities (see attached) and on the realistic and experienced "worst-case" parking needs of stand-alone full service fitness clubs in nearby cities (e.g. Gold's Gym, the Sports Connection, Nautilus Plus Etc.). However, given the variety and type of facilities that fall under.the gymnasium/fitness center, classification and the scarcity of large sites for full service facilities in Hermosa Beach, these standards have not proven to be useful for the 5 requests for such - .1 businesses since 1990. Each case has thus been evaluated on its own merits depending on the type of use; operating times; number of students if classes were offered; and, the availability of shared parking facilities. None of these businesses have come close to providing parking at the required ratio on-site, but no serious problems have been noticed. In order to allow for these typical small and moderate size gymnasiums/fitness centers to open as a matter of right, but, to provide some protection to the City in the case of a large full service facility, the following is recommended: 11. G mnasiums/Health and Fitness Centers, as follows: Y � • Less than or equal to 3,000 square feet, and with less than or equal to 20 students at onetime if classes offered: I space per 250 square feet of gross floor area. Greater than 3,000 square feet, or, with more than 20 students at one time if classes offered: 1 space per 100 square feet of gross floor area: The above recommendation would have the effect, in conjunction with the proposed elimination of the C.U.P. requirement, to permit small and moderate size gyms and fitness clubs as a matter of right in many existing buildings which are currently office or retail spaces. Larger facilities would either have to provide the parking on-site or obtain approval of a Parking Plan from the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 1169 of the zoning code. For further background please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff re ort. ob rtson CONCUR: Associate Planner Sol Blumenf d, director Comm ity evelopment Department Stephen R. urrell City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Planning Commission Staff Report w/attachments KR/pcsrgym A 14 15 16 17 ORDINANCE 95 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARDS TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTERS AND THE ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on February 14, 1995 to consider oral and written testimony and made the following findings: A. The parking requirements for gymnasiums, while representing a possible worst cage" situation for a large full-service health and fitness club, are not realistic for most such facilities and, therefore, should be reduced; B. Only large, full-service, health and fitness club should have parking requirements in excess of the. requirements for general commercial retail establishments; C. An initial study has been prepared by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and it was determined that the proposed amendment would result in a less than significant impact on the environment; NOW; THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 1152(E) #11, parking requirements for gymnasiums/health and fitness centers, to read as follows: _ "11. Gymnasiums/Health and Fitness Centers, as follows: 1) Less than or equal to 3,000 square feet, and with less than or equal to 20 students at onetime if classes offered: 1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area. 2) Greater than 3,000,square feet, or, with more than 20 students at one time if classes offered: I space per 100 square feet of gross floor area" SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and in be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption: SECTION 3.' Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the EaV Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the 3 1 passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at hi h h same is passed and adopted. which the P P 2 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1995, 4 by the following vote: 5 AYES: 6 NOES: ABSTAIN: 7 ABSENT: 8 g PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa. Beach, California _ 10 11 ATTEST: 12 CITY CLERK 13 D A T F APPROVE S O ORM: 14 CITY ATTORNEY 15 16 17 18 19, 20 21 22 . 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION 94-36 1 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE 3 IN REGARDS TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTERS AND THE ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION 4 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 6, 1994 to 5 6 consider oral and written testimony and made the following findings: 7 A. The parking requirements for gymnasiums, while representing a possible worst case 8 situation for a large full-service health and fitness club, are not realistic for most such - 9 facilities and, therefore, should be reduced; 10 B. Only large, full-service, health and fitness club should have parking requirements in excess 11 of the requirements for general commercial retail establishments;; 12 C. An initial study has been prepared by the Staff Environmental Review Committee and it . 13 was determined that the proposed amendment would result in a less than significant impact on the environment; 14 NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach 15 recommends that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: 16 SECTION 1. Amend Section .1152(E) #11, parking requirements for gymnasiums/health and 17 fitness centers, to read as follows: 18 "11. Gymnasiums/Health and Fitness Centers, as follows:—_, 19 2 0 ° Less than 3,001 square feet, and with less than 21 students at one time if classes offered: .1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area. 21 Greater than 3,000 square feet, or, with more than 20 students at one time if classes 22 offered: 1 space per 100 square feet of gross floor area" 23 VOTE: AYES: Comms. DiMonda, Marks, Merl, Tucker, Chmn. Dettelbach NOES: None 24 ABSENT: _ None ABSTAIN: None 25 CERTIFICATION 26 I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 94-36 is a true and complete record of the action 27 taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular 28 meeting of December 6, 1994. 29 Alan Deltel5ach, Chairman S"ol Blterfeld, Secretary D to 5 ON by Comm Merl Seconded by Comm. Marks, CONTINUEE CUP 9 41 toth Planning Commissio nuary 17, 1995 meeting, with the understanding this was the third continu and no more would be gran Tliat other than the parking lot striping and landscaping, the equirements are to be completed, including su ttal of a landscaping plan including trea e�the easterly wall for presentation at the January 17, 199 eting; all issues are to iscussed and resolved with the Planning Department Staff prior to the Janua 199 eting. . AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Ma erl, Tucker, Chm ettelbach . NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: e 8. TEXT 946 -- TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING PARKIN STANDARDS FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL G G G FITNESS CENTERS AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Staff Recomended Action- To recommend approval of said toxt amendment and adoption o the g f h Environmental Ne ative.Declaration: Mr: Schubach presented the Staff Report, stating Staff recommended reduction of parking requirements for gymnasiums and physical fitness centers and noting no significant problems had been experienced when lesserP suggested by arkin was allowed. He discussed the cut-off point being su ested b Staff. P g Comm. Tuckeruestioned the basis for establishment of the cut-off oint recommended b Staff. He q P Y noted such centers usually greatly impact the residential areas. Comm. Merl felt the only real measure was the square footage, noting the difficulty in regulation. Director Blumenfeld commented the intent was to make the parking slightly less restrictive. Chmn. Dettelbach opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m. No one wished to speak relating to this item, and Chmn. Dettelbach closed the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Marks, to APPROVE TEXT 94-6 Staffs recommendation as written for the change in parking standards for gymnasiums and physical fitness centers and adoption of an environmental negative declaration. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl, Tucker, Chmn. Dettelbach NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: '-.None Page PC Minutes 12-6-94 September 20, 1994 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission December 6, 1994 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 94-6 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO REDUCE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTERS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation To recommend reducing the parking requirement as set forth below: Background At the meeting of May 24, 1994, the City Council directed staff to study amending Section 11.52(e) #11 to reduce the parking requirement for gymnasiums/health and fitness centers. The issue was discussed in connection with the comprehensive study of uses that require C.U.P's in which it was also recommended to remove the C.U.P., requirement for gymnasiums/health and fitness centers. The City Council established the parking requirements for gymnasiums in January of 1990 at the same time it was added as a permitted use in,the C-2 zone and added as a use that required a C.U.P. Section 1152(e) #11 sets forth the parking requirement as follows: 11. Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center: l space for each 50 square feet of gross floor area for facilities offering exercise, fitness, or aerobic dance classes, or 1 space for each 100 square feet of gross floor area for gymnasium type. weight lifting and weight training activities. Prior to the adoption of the amendment in 1990, the parking requirement for gymnasiums was not clear and would have probably been based on the standards for auditoriums for sports and public assembly under Section 1152(A), which requires 1 space per S seats or for each 50 - square feet of floor area whichever is greater. �I Since the 1990 amendment 5 small and moderate sized gymnasiums/fitness centers have opened in the City. These consist of 2 gymnasiums, and 3 martial arts studios ranging from 1000 - 3200 square feet in size with a maximum class size of 20. In addition to obtaining C.U.P.'s, all applied for and were granted Parking Plan waivers to the parking requirements either because of their location in I multiple tenant buildings with shared parking or in downtown, or as a result of other unique features. Analysis Thegarkin standard established in 1990 was based on a comparison with other South Bay p Cities see attached and on the realistic and experienced worst-case parking needs of stand- alone full service fitness clubs in nearby cities (e.g. Gold's Gym, the Sports Connection, Nautilus Plus Etc.). However, given the variety and type of facilities that fall -under the gymnasium/fitness center classification and the scarcity g of large sites for full, service facilities in Hermosa Beach, these standards have not proven to be useful. Each case was evaluated on its own merits depending on the type of use; operating times; number of students if classes were offered; and, the availability of shared parking facilities. None of the businesses have come close to providing parking at the required ratio on-site, but no serious problems have been noticed. Nonetheless, keeping standards set at this fairly restrictive"worst-case" scenario resulted in each of the less intense uses being evaluated on its merits through the Parking Plan procedure. Further, the standards protect the City from potential parking problems should a full service fitness club wish to locate in an existing or new building, and it may be advisable to avoid reducing the standard too far. In order to allow for small and moderate size gymnasiums/fitness centers to open as a matter of right, but to provide some protection to the City in the case of a large full service facility, the following is suggested: 11. Gymnasiums/Health and Fitness Centers, as follows: • Less than 3,001 square feet, and with less than 21 students at one time. if classes offered. 1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area. • ` Greater than 3,000 square feet, or, with more than 20 students at one time if classes offered: 1 space per 100 square feet of gross floor area. The above recommendation would have the effect, in conjunction with the proposed elimination of the C.U.P. requirement, to permit small and moderate size gyms and fitness clubs as a matter of right in many existing buildings which are currently office or retail spaces. 8 Larger facilities would either have to provide the parking on-site or obtain approval of a Parking Plan from the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 1169 of the zoning code. Ken Robertson CONCUR: ' A7 Associate Planner Michael Schubach Planning Director Sol Blumenfel , Director Community Ddvelopment Department Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. List of other cities' standards I.C.C. Minutes 9/13/94 and resolution of intent 4. C.C. Ordinance 90-1022 5. City Council Minutes 5/24/94 KR/pcsrgym -- __ CITY PARKING REQUIREMENT Manhattan Beach 1 per 100 square feet Redondo Beach Case by case review as part of C.U.P. Torrance 1 per 100 square feet Gardena 1- per 150 square feet Hawthorne 1 per 250 square feet Long Beach 5 spaces plus: 1 per 50 square feet of exercise area 1 per 25,0 square feet of office, locker, shower area (m) Recommendation to deny the following.claims,And refer them to i City's Liability Claims Administrator. Memorandum r ersonnel Director Robert Blackwood dated September 6, 1994 Acton: To approve the staff recommendation to deny he foll wing claims and refer to the City's Liability aims Admin i trator .1) Cl imant: Ohmer, John Paul Dat of Loss:. 02/19/94 Date iled :. 08/17/94 - Allega ion Allowing median parking ong Hermosa Avenue -and failure to pla e a STOP sign at Hermosa Avenue an Sixth Street caused a collision be een claimant on bicycle and oncoming raffic; and, 2) Claimant: Te ra, Richard Date of Loss: 07/31/94 Date Filed /21/94 Allegation Cl imant injur when he stepped into a ho l in the 's'dewalk at 13th Street and the trand Failure to properly mainta' s eets and areas traversed by pedestr S. (n).RECOMMENDATION TO- ADOPT RES UTION APPROVING FINAL MAP 21667 FOR ATwo-UNI cOND MINIUM AT 1051 MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Memorandu from Co unity Development Director - Sol Blumenfeld dated gust 23, 19 4. _ This item was moved from the consent calendar. by .Councilmember Ed rton-for separate di cussion later in the meeting due to questions regarding the time length allowed for the permi Community, evelopment Director Blumenfel responded to Council estions. Actio To adopt Resolution No. 94-5703, a titled, $'A RESOLtTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HE SA BEACH CALIFORNIA GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #21667 FOR A/TSdO-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1051 11,ONTEREY OULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Benz. The motion carrie by a unanimous vote. (o) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO STUDY GYMNASIUM PARKING REQUIREMENT AND TRASH ENCLOSURE REQUIREMENT FOR SMALL MARKETS AND RESTAURANTS. Memorandum _ from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 6, 1994. Action: To adopt Resolution of Intent No. 94-5700, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO INITIATE STUDIES OF: City Council Minutes 09-13-94 Pave 8612 r 56ZX ISL-LM-LBATING RESOLUTIONS OF INTENT. Memora dum fr\,nb6 nity Development Director Sol Blumenfeld ated Se6, 1994. Thwas removed from the consent Cale dar by Councilber Bowler for separate'discussion lat in the men order to congratulate Community evelopment Dilumenfeldfor taking the ini iative in stn the Ordinance amendment_ process. AcTo adopt Resolution -of Inten No. 9�4-57040 enCoA RE OLIITION OF INTENT OF THE CI COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA EACH CALIFORNIA TO IIATIATE STUDY AND CONSIDERATION OF A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE tONING ORDINANCE TO ELIMINATE THE REOftREMENT FOR RESOLUTtONS OF INTENT TO INITIATE TEXT AMENDM TS.e1 Motion Bowler, secondEdgerton. /GAGIREEMENT motion carried by a Cunanimous vote. (q) RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND TH EXISTI WITH ALLRIGHT PARKING FOR MINIMUM STAFftNG REQUIREMENTS AND HOURS OF OPERATION. Memorandum fr lic Works Director Amy Amirani dated September.6, 199 . This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Benz for separate discussi late `in -the meeting. Public Works Director Am' ani respon d to Council questions and said the lots wo d be open r both entering and departing vehicles whi a there was no a tendant on duty. Action: To approv the Downtown Busines Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission and staffcommendation to amend the existi g Allright Parking agrees nt .for minimum staffing require ents from one staff for each of Lots Band ` H (two'staff to al) to only one staff for both is B andL H, and.hours of Aeration from the current hours 8:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. aily'to 10:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. du 'ng winter months, an 10:00 A.M. to 12:00 midnight Buri` summer months. Motion M or Benz; second Bowler. The motion Carrie by a unanimot}S vote. (r) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD BID FOR THE PURCHASE OF TWO IITIL Y �- TRUCKS AND ONE DUMP TRUCK. Memorandum from Public Wor Zctor.Amy Amirani dated September, 8, 1994. item was removed from the agenda by staff in order to rebid the project. City Council Minutes 09-13-94 Page 8613 i RESOLUTION 94-5700 A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, 2 CALIFORNIA TO INITIATE STUDIES OF PARKING STANDARDS FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTERS, AND TRASH REQUIREMENTS FOR 3 SMALL BUSINESSES 4 5 WHEREAS, the City Council held a public. meeting on September 13, 1994, to consider 6 initiating these two studies for possible text amendments and made the following findings: A. Parkin requirements ements as expressed in a ratio of the number of spaces required per gross floor Parking 9 P P q P s 9 area established for uses classified as gymnasium/physical fitness centers should be examined for 10 their accuracy and reflection of actual need; 11 B. Requirements for trash storage and enclosures for commercial businesses and policies for 12 enforcement of said requirements should be examined especially with respect to the unique 13 14 constraints and problems for smaller businesses located near. residential areas: 15 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY INITIATE STUDIES OF 16 PARKING STANDARDS FOR GYMNASIUMS/PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTERS, AND 17 TRASH REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES AND DIRECTS STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO EXAMINE THE MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE is AND CUIR,RENT CITY POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR POSSIBLE CHANGES 19 20 PASSED, APPROVED ADOP TED this 13 t4ay of September ; 1994 21 22 X � 23 PRESIDENT of the City Council YOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 24 ATTEST: 2s 26 D;, , • , ,—a -_ D� CITY CLERK 27 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 28 A�A,-CITY ATTORNEY 29 H/ccrsint _13_ t 2 3 4 5 6 7 15 16 17 18 19 20- 21 ORDINANCE 90- 1022 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD GYMNASIUMMEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE, C-2, RESTRICTED. COMMERCIAL- ZONE,.WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; AND TO ESTABLISH PARKING STANDARDS FOR SAID USE AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS,the City Council held a public hearing on January 9, .1990, to receive oral and written' testimony regarding a text amendment to allow gymnasium/health and fitness center as permitted use in,"the C-2 zone, and to establish parking standards for said use and made the following findings: A. Gymnasiums and health and fitness centers are not any more intrusive than other uses. allowed in the C-2,- Restricted `Commercial Zone; B. Because of the parking demand, the variety of the types of- gymnasiums/health and fitness centers, and its possible impact on the character of C-2 zoned areas, a conditional use permit to establish this type of use should be required;, C. By requiring parking at a ratio of1 spaceper50 square feet of gross floor area used for facilities with fitness/exercise classes, and 1 space per 100 square feet for gymnasiums with weight lifting and weight training facilities,.and requiring the review. necessary of a Conditional Use Permit will mitigate any potential impacts associated with the parking demand or the intensity of a gymnasium/health and fitness center; D. The location of a gymnasium/health and fitness center in the C-2 zone 'is appropriate for C-2 areas within, the City and would be .-compatible with surrounding commercial and t residential- uses; 3 NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the zoning ordinance .text be amended as 4 follows: SECTION•l. -Amend Section 8-3. C-2 Restricted Commercial zone by 5 adding, to the permitted use list in alphabetical 6 order: "Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center; Conditional 7 Use permit required subject to Article 10" 8 SECTION 2. • - General Commercial zone b Amend Section 8`4. C-3 y eliminating the following from, the permitted use 9 'list: 10 "Gymnasium; Health center, physical fitness" 11 SECTION 3. Amend Section 1152.;Off-street parking, commercial, 12 and business uses, by adding under (E)Commercial uses: 13 "11. Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Center: 1 space 14 for each 50 square feet of gross floor area for facilities offering exercise, fitness, or aerobic 15 dance classes, or 1 space for each 100 square feet. of gross floor area for gymnasium type weight g gYm YP g - lifting and weight training activities" 16 SECTION 4. Amend ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS, by adding the 17 o win _ f llo . g• 18 -"Seca 283. Gymnasium/Health and,Fitness Center. 19 A facilet_y, whetherther open to the public or, a private club, which provides the indoor space, 20 equipment, and the supervision/training/teaching for physical activities including, but not limited to, 21 sporting activities, . exercising, martial arts, dancing, weight training, gymnastics, ane 22,1aerobic spas. 23. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective and. be in full 24 force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its -final passage and adoption. 25 SECTION 6. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days. after. - the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall causE 26'this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a 27 an weekly newspaper of general circulation publishedc circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. _ 28 SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall .enter the same in 1 the book of _original ordinances. of said city, and shall make _minutes. of the passage and adoption 2 thereof in the records of the.proceedings of the City Council at,which the same is passed and adopted. 3 PASSED,; APPROV and A TED this 23rd day of 4 January, 1990. 5 RE ENT o City Council and MAYOR 6 of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 7 ATTE T 8 CITY CLERK 9 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 10 CITY ATTORNEY 11 c/ccordgym 12 13 14 15 16 - 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 - 28 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF.LOS ANGELES' ) : CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I LINDA RIDDLE Deputy Cit P Y Y Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance- No. 90-10,22 was duly and regularly passed, approved and..adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach at- li a regular meeting held at the regular meeting place thereof on the 23th day of January, 1990 and was published in the Easy Reader on February 1, 1990. The vote was as follows: AYES: Essertier,"Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton. NOES: None Absent: Sheldon ABSTAIN: None DATED: February 2, 1990 City Clerk r 5. SPECIAL STUDY OF THE COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USE LIST. INCLUDING ADDING OR 'DELETING THE REQUIREMENT FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR CERTAIN USES THE CONDITIONS FOR CERTAIN USES AND CONSIDERING WHAT USES ARE PERMITTED IN EACH ZONE. (Continued from meeting of 4/26/94) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated. May 17, 1994. - Planning.Director Schubach presented.the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney- VosL-pro responded to Council questions. - - - The public hearing opened at 8:21 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item-was:- June tem was: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, expressed concern regarding the lack of specifications contained in the public noticing of this item;- - and, Michael Stifano - (no address -given), questioned why C.U.P.s were by a class of --business- use rather - - than a.specific case or location. -- The public hearing closed at 8:26 P.M. - - City Council Minutes 05-24-94 Page 8529 4 Action: ---.To approve ----the--staff recommendation that .a C.U.P. is required for Reverse Vending Machines only if the request varies from the standard conditions in Section 10-10, with the amendment that the machine be located either. a specific minimum distance from residential property or, be restricted to only certain specific commercial zones. Motion Oakes, second Benz. The motion carried by a 'unanimous vote. - Action: To direct the Planning Commission to consider the exemption of Gymnasium/Health and Fitness Centers from the requirement of a C.U.P. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Oakes and Reviczky. Action: To direct a study on amending Section .1152 (E) #11, to reduce parking requirements. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. - Action: To direct the Planning Commission to consider the standards used by Manhattan Beach regarding a C.U.P. only, for Off -Sale Alcohol Establishments that operate after 10:30 P.M. Motion Bowler, second Benz. The proposed amendment made by Reviczky that a differentiation be made.between Liquor Stores and Markets that sell alcohol on -the basis that -20 -percent or less of the total sales be from alcohol was not accepted by the maker of the main motion. The main motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Reviczky. - Action: To direct staff to address the issue of the trash receptacle requirements in a C.U.P. for smaller markets and restaurants. Motion Oakes, second Benz. The motion carried by -a unanimous vote. The meeting recessed at 9:24 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:47; P.M. councilmember Bowler declared a conflict on the next item to be considered as he is the owner of a restaurant with beer and wine. He then left (w the dais and the room at 9:48 P.M. Proposed Action: To eliminate the requirement for a C.U.P. for a Restaurant/Cafe with Beer and Wine . Motion Benz. The motion died due to the Tack of a second. City.Council Minutes 05-2'4-94 Pacre 8530 Final Action: To direct the Planning Commission of the Council's desire to continue the requirement of a C.U.P. for a Restaurant/Cafe with Beer and Wine, with the understanding that the Council. will consider modifying the .conditions for this use to ensure that they are reasonable. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz and the absence of Bowler.. Councilmember Bowler returned to the dais at 10:00 P.M. ; 6 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND PORTIONS OF ARTICLE 13.5 OF NG ORDINANCE SIGNS TO 'CREATE EXCEPTIONS OR �HfflORICSIGNS GRAND OPENING SIGNS AND CALCULATIO OF SIGN COVERAGE, with an Ordinance for ado tion. M'from Planning Director Michael Schubac dated May 6, 1994. Planni• Director Schubach presented the staf report and respond to Council questions. The public hea ing opened at 10:12 P.M. no one came forward to addr s the Council on this emthe public hearing closed at 0:12 P.M. , Action: To di ct staff to retur with the Manhattan Beach Sign Ordina ce in regard for Council review. to window sign coverage Motion Oakes_, second owler. Co ncilmember Benz withdrew his second, the motion was the -seconded by Bowler. The motion carried by a una 'mous ote. Final Action: To app ve the Planning_ Commission recommendation to adopt O d 4 ance No. •95-1106, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI Y O HERMOSA BEACH CALIF'ORidIA TO AMEND PORTIONS O ARTI6LE 13.5 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE SIGNS TO EATE EXCE TIONS FOR HISTORIC SIGNS AND FOR GRAND OPENIN SIGNS.n Motion R;e7knd Benz. _ AYES: , Oakes,-Reviczky Mayor EdgertonNOES: At 10:16 P.M.order of the agenda was retur d to item 3. MUNICIPAL MAT _ 7. 'CONSID RATION OF LEGAL NOTICING CONTRACT ALT ATIVES.- Vity ndum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated ay 12,_ lerk Doerfling responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 05-24-94 page 8531 _� Easy Reader Run Date: January 26, 1995 DISPLAY Acct: 7010-2110 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 14, 1995, to consider the following: 1. Text amendment to the zoning ordinance regarding parking standards for gymnasiums/physical fitness centers and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration. SAID PUBLIC HEARING shall be at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA"90254. ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate and speak at this hearing at the above time and place. For inclusion in the agenda packet to be distributed, written comments of interested parties should be submitted to the Community Development Department, Planning Division in care of Cit Hall at the above address prior to Thursda Februa 9 1995 at 12:00 Y P Y, rY non All 1 written testimony by any. interested party will be accepted prior to or at the scheduled time on the agenda for the matter. r . IF YOU CHALLENGE the above matter(s) in court, you may be. limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to.the Community Development Department, Planning Division, at, or prior. to, the public hearing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, please contact the Community Development Department, , Planning Division, at (310) 318-0242. A copy 'of the staff report(s) in the City Council packet will be available for public review at the end of the business day February 9 1995 at the Hermosa Beach Police Department. Elaine Doerfling City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach yc:easy I.: Named corporate donor must contribute at least 50% of the total cost of park design C /f Redondo Beach _ HOMETOWN NEWS Vowne XXIV. N unoer 21 FREE 70.000 Circulation in the South Boy January 14, 1993 by Michael Macdonald �.._ 4 k,�1„ nf•-Iy'serr Fb1'Y R t"> ,a-IIZI ,�r f. �Gy �• •. David Earl Weber died in his sleep last Wednesday ? r"ns,, ' 3 .'4i�vz ;a�� s'3 �»ft`,`-,ys' �t5 Mee - night in a small shop on T 1^t'fs 3s 'Ia t a� 3 ,T' `V' Pacific Coast Highway. AME'-w- OT fT : doctor certified that his , , �aoG,�4" Ever, assaulted bytoo many ? �.r years ofheavy drinking, had. }?k'x..s X �+ie"°iz..'-tom:' x`-?`i�•T . finally ceased to function. gt'- s, fyl;'- v, •ate � But the mediaphone-calls which began ringing that - night at the Hermosa Beach - , � fy�, tK�e� t1-,-�?� �.� _ ?hyyo�`"�-`�..s•`� - • .:tiF •m ...�� s t, t �� �� - £.h;G ski J a'-5 cS police de-partment weren't +y'� xst zaa�rS v c for the owner of a small�� retail business about to -lose + sd 1 � `: a t ?L 4 w '� j t rt T. s •. �r ti �a its doors. y�wx lk: _ a •, r,. e Sw y11W. '`t'htF *"�y..zy3 Dewey Weber was dead tar's* ` rx sx�w r��a y �f a r+ -: %e�x vti at age 53. Across America £ Y :� k>'� �t t �` c"• i r r• ztr, g o ✓<�^ fi �^ Ta r fi.�cricas µ: <<a^i `.A -.w from Maine to Honolulu t �i ra ��'�t'`'�j�.... f yit���� s'x .' � !i--���. :„A,> „ai,F •w • plpeople saw the reports and P w••.t im. • .i", a a s xr •�+, r `. a mourned the loss of a slice y R rat -F'"• SCx t r n yi. _ Lj •N (1" >'�� y. w(+� t,';h'*'; �f '�� $�et:..'�' of their youth. A golden boY � 'c' � `'• •-�.`v�'s " ;� '•'�� + `J ''" �• � s'�- 1'• 'x - � t '1 _ �Y.`.. `�.. '*-:-. ��; `x^.�.3 �4•': ,t � i'7.,. �- �iy"� - yz` F of summer had slipped into ci Y ry s _ .rr: r r� .. i �� �n •� -� - a -p r '� �-}s. r•- s fix. y n ` r 42, a too -soon winter. �+. � y- 1`'cu_,a y y sn �, eae .ice. b+f{iyc-bsaa�+kk w'n. A -•.. i "�c.a>-. f The international surfing 41,3 ti•s•: _ community lost a classic., an exceptional athlete and3 `ate t kms„ C•.,° _ t } tL�s > �. i industry pioneer whose last �- + j, #:-�,l.T r few years had been awash � :t+-� • ��n�`'� ,� �� � t„�` -, ' �t� � r in sadness. Dewey Weber was the first media surf -star. His- namebecame synonymous with the sport of surfing in the mid -1960's as Holly- wood and popular music discovered what had been '; `•i ^may ,. �". an esoteric water sport practiced by a few thou- r--• • 1 , sand iconoclasts and eccen- ^ _?�" w' tries in California and Ha- waii. Dewey Weber rips a cut-back at 22nd SL in Hermosa in 1966 while throwing a mug at photographer LeRoy Grannis. by Mike PorpuS special aphrodisiac. It was a right didn't like that. When Dewey `Dewey Webers surtinq style was all his own. There is ahugevoidin mysoul breaking wave. But Dewey was was around there was nothing and the sport of surfing. If you fading left. Half way down.the . little about him. Dewey got the. Dewey didn t copy anyone. Nobody could copy would wonder why the big fuss face he plants his back foot over nicknamewasbecause of theway Dewey either They called Dewey. over the passing of a little man a yard behind from his left foot, he ran up and down his surf named Dewey Weber, sit up and throws both arms out straight board so fast. Dewey s forehand The Little Man on Wheels. take notice. and swings into the most aggres- turn was the most powerful turn In July 1958I was kicking back sive forehand turn in surfing. He insurfng. Theway Deweywould : on the 30th Street steps in Her- . was only 5'3' but he looked 6'4.' always fade into it was awesome Service for Dewey Weber will be Saturday, January 23 mosa after a Tong surf session. That day. I fell in love with beauty. at 8 a.m. at thefoot of Avenue C in Redondo Beach. This little guy came paddling into Dewey's surfing. God, I miss that character. If Weber's ashes will be brought by boat. A memorial theline-up,Myoldmentorswere Dewey Webers surfing style you look up the word character gathering v< -ill be held at the Beach Boys Cafe in . around and were anxious to. see was all his own. Dewey didn't in the dictionary you'll find.,a Dewey surf.: copy anyone. Nobody could copy picture of Dewey. Look up show Hermosa Beach after the ceremony. Dewey dropped into the fust Dewey either. They called Dewey manship you'll find a biggerpic- wave of the set like it was his 'The Little Man on Wheels.' I ture. >8 Z, -M N SA: BEACH - Ee opedhis distinctive cat -1 ike quick-, D6. stepping Style. Using his wrestler's we Zzeflexes and muscles, Web&uld CID to the nose and back �ey'Webq was there. to quicker: .�: than anyone in his era, a style promore me. sport and ready tO�_'�`Perfectly suited to the � dumpy:na sellsurfboardsacross the courl_-�, z -waves of Manhatta� and Hermosa... _k try to anyone who fell 'under that Weber. Anyone who ever saw, We Op, California -tinged could siiff d not mistake him for— t .......... "No matter how you slice. it,. another rider. Dubbed 'The Little it's a tragedy,'.said Roy Bream, :%Man I on Wheels,._ Weber� took who co -owned his first surfboard surfing performance to - a g q,' W� h! h with Weber in Manhattan Beach: level. in 1950. ...'Dewey excelled in ev.. Although not 'famous for his e rythin g he . tried, from big -wave riding, Gibson remem- Olt. skateboarding to ping-pong. to bers Weber in Hawaii. .'We. went over in 1956. 18 wrestling:"He was super CO "A ordinated with quick reflexes- guys from the South Bay were Gibby Gibson first met Weber living in it Dewey and Carol Weber sit in front of three special. boards made for it surf quonset hut at Makaha. expo in 1966. Photo by Ulto Grannis 'He was as good in big waves as, at Manhattan's Grandview El- y in"1948. They. small. We tried to use these '.berhewas o'ncea abulous skier,`,!-,:, asically.'being ementary School worked Herald Examiner our. pnvate Paper. 'spoo'n-tailed boards at Sunsetand said old friend surf, b 9 end Sonny yardeman..' surf instructor.' routes together, surfed and fished.' -We had just got killed, spinning out. Then 'Stein Ericson took -a liking to . foot Hobie. it. took two of us to :. - "Dewey was a great wrestler, we . got some longer boards.*..-.. him. at . Aspen . Highlands and carry everDewey 'There -was"a -restaurant in ki but he suffered to make weight. skied with him. Dewey was t* to where., us guarding He used to sit in a sweat box for Waikiki that had a 60 -ounce steak a tremendous urs. ho Barry Jones remembers rs sweep—r.:' which cost 327.50. If * )u ate 'As a lifeguard, h get mg.up in the old shop in Venice';�'�` ]Is seeing all in an - hour, 'you got it free: into the structured lifes e. Th John McFarland re'ca YC e couldn't' a young Dewey standing outside. -lbewey .,tyl ere,:-, that Weber took over from Dale-_'... and I and one other guy was a. real. strict lieutenant who'-: L Velzy's shop above the Manhat- down and ate three of them: tan Beach Pie :��itting-o got' on. his case. Dewey always.,-tf.-.,.i -on -Dewey must have weighed kids hang... "He was -a -legend alre-id 125, had a. group of young-.-.-. -came in there without a -penny. . to street.. 'Velzy said he was having pounds then, but. he, asked for.* ing around his tower,' Vardeman,..., My name and Dewey gave.me a troublemaking weight for a -.--pie ala mode afterwaids Gibson now a lifeguard match lieutenant , said. I did grunt work to pay it - ,n ich said. _,,_'Dewey was lik", . i� , -. . e a king to those off Weber was undefeated in­c-'�-- -G Gibson, di want to -kids, teachin't*h*e'!'m!'t'o'surf..I.t.90t;.,;,;.,,� Webei may have eague competition and I . 9 been - s darke' 'hiri-i'ini trouble tQ...� speak * about W6e? ..pore. a lot of trou le.'-. fort 6 as a faiher-fig MF four. times. Several colleges abl. ..,side. "'Dewey once told me, I'm' -�:.�-,:,John was one. of thos'e )ffered Weber wrestling I not A people person'.1 wish people kids who idolized Weber. Dale Velzy 6d taken the young -i'."' 9 schoar, h kids than with the roles reverse&'_`.,'.. - ;hips, but . surfing had, taken over ;"7would like me better, but P!� -`"-�took 'myself and Cully Raglan its heart. 9 an Weber under his M wing in an - just not a people person.' under his wiing.'He "spe n*t two full By this time, Weber had -.hattan. Beach -in"'.the-early devel-� 'A lot of people don't rem6m`-`- *summers teaching., ds how to %: - 4-.4 sfkkV-,a T V 1. N 7 V; -k Z� XYf.-(, Z, -M N SA: BEACH - Ee opedhis distinctive cat -1 ike quick-, D6. stepping Style. Using his wrestler's we Zzeflexes and muscles, Web&uld CID to the nose and back �ey'Webq was there. to quicker: .�: than anyone in his era, a style promore me. sport and ready tO�_'�`Perfectly suited to the � dumpy:na sellsurfboardsacross the courl_-�, z -waves of Manhatta� and Hermosa... _k try to anyone who fell 'under that Weber. Anyone who ever saw, We Op, California -tinged could siiff d not mistake him for— t .......... "No matter how you slice. it,. another rider. Dubbed 'The Little it's a tragedy,'.said Roy Bream, :%Man I on Wheels,._ Weber� took who co -owned his first surfboard surfing performance to - a g q,' W� h! h with Weber in Manhattan Beach: level. in 1950. ...'Dewey excelled in ev.. Although not 'famous for his e rythin g he . tried, from big -wave riding, Gibson remem- Olt. skateboarding to ping-pong. to bers Weber in Hawaii. .'We. went over in 1956. 18 wrestling:"He was super CO "A ordinated with quick reflexes- guys from the South Bay were Gibby Gibson first met Weber living in it Dewey and Carol Weber sit in front of three special. boards made for it surf quonset hut at Makaha. expo in 1966. Photo by Ulto Grannis 'He was as good in big waves as, at Manhattan's Grandview El- y in"1948. They. small. We tried to use these '.berhewas o'ncea abulous skier,`,!-,:, asically.'being ementary School worked Herald Examiner our. pnvate Paper. 'spoo'n-tailed boards at Sunsetand said old friend surf, b 9 end Sonny yardeman..' surf instructor.' routes together, surfed and fished.' -We had just got killed, spinning out. Then 'Stein Ericson took -a liking to . foot Hobie. it. took two of us to :. - "Dewey was a great wrestler, we . got some longer boards.*..-.. him. at . Aspen . Highlands and carry everDewey 'There -was"a -restaurant in ki but he suffered to make weight. skied with him. Dewey was t* to where., us guarding He used to sit in a sweat box for Waikiki that had a 60 -ounce steak a tremendous urs. ho Barry Jones remembers rs sweep—r.:' which cost 327.50. If * )u ate 'As a lifeguard, h get mg.up in the old shop in Venice';�'�` ]Is seeing all in an - hour, 'you got it free: into the structured lifes e. Th John McFarland re'ca YC e couldn't' a young Dewey standing outside. -lbewey .,tyl ere,:-, that Weber took over from Dale-_'... and I and one other guy was a. real. strict lieutenant who'-: L Velzy's shop above the Manhat- down and ate three of them: tan Beach Pie :��itting-o got' on. his case. Dewey always.,-tf.-.,.i -on -Dewey must have weighed kids hang... "He was -a -legend alre-id 125, had a. group of young-.-.-. -came in there without a -penny. . to street.. 'Velzy said he was having pounds then, but. he, asked for.* ing around his tower,' Vardeman,..., My name and Dewey gave.me a troublemaking weight for a -.--pie ala mode afterwaids Gibson now a lifeguard match lieutenant , said. I did grunt work to pay it - ,n ich said. _,,_'Dewey was lik", . i� , -. . e a king to those off Weber was undefeated in­c-'�-- -G Gibson, di want to -kids, teachin't*h*e'!'m!'t'o'surf..I.t.90t;.,;,;.,,� Webei may have eague competition and I . 9 been - s darke' 'hiri-i'ini trouble tQ...� speak * about W6e? ..pore. a lot of trou le.'-. fort 6 as a faiher-fig MF four. times. Several colleges abl. ..,side. "'Dewey once told me, I'm' -�:.�-,:,John was one. of thos'e )ffered Weber wrestling I not A people person'.1 wish people kids who idolized Weber. Dale Velzy 6d taken the young -i'."' 9 schoar, h kids than with the roles reverse&'_`.,'.. - ;hips, but . surfing had, taken over ;"7would like me better, but P!� -`"-�took 'myself and Cully Raglan its heart. 9 an Weber under his M wing in an - just not a people person.' under his wiing.'He "spe n*t two full By this time, Weber had -.hattan. Beach -in"'.the-early devel-� 'A lot of people don't rem6m`-`- *summers teaching., ds how to %: - 4-.4 sfkkV-,a Jacobs left to start his a: Weber became Velzy's . shopmanager. Velzy's lack. of gg attention to'business details .got him in trouble with the IRS and , eventually lead to his bankruptcy. details of the dissolution of Surfboards by Velzy and the start- up of Surfboards by Dewey Weber, yr 7 disputed by both men, left Velzy , ,bitter. Weber ended up with Velzy's shop, his tools,. many of r 'his customers as surfing exploded %- in the foam -board era. ?I never forgave him. He was a con artist,' Velzy said. T , ewey's own childhood national exposure as Bus- ter Brown and an ap- e on the Ed Sullivan Show as •z.•�.:.: a Duncan Yo-yo champion r gave him an advantage over - per - t".•:haps better craftsmen like Velzy and Jacobs when surfing started a . r JZ;,, to break. out -of California. _ � it 4 iY ,c1 He had seen marketing up close- i DeWQ,/ hF'n? ,��yfi't' t z He knew how notoriety and public k. vJ 'sem Al Y �1 SK vtzr exposure translated into sales. 807 '' d���Ji ^; - r trR : r.Weber'smarketing mirrored his was like a father: fo him'' 'rr surfing and wrestling styles; ag= ! gressive, muscular and persistent. Y V Said 'I. watched him grow Weber sold the most surfboards up. He was areal good surfer anc�;' duringsurfing'sinitial boom. Hobie `Or Alter may have made more money • `areal good hustler. The dark side �'� ' of Dewey was that he . cli ed� as he branched into catamarans pp and sporting goods, but Dewey everybody he could ' + rode the fast commercial" wave s' : Y� best, backing up increased pro- _Velzy-,was', and is a master '` w•"' 'duction. with surf -team tours, craftt. sman, a' shaper of iI1t111t1OII which made his rectangular red .-and sensitive And, he would be t ; s, and white logo instantly recog- cf I .c - ' ble the count the :: ry. first admit, t a • • • , hornble� "t,,�'t : .. , . ;While other shop -owners were , P - buslneSSman. Velzy'was the pre S reluctant to invest in the means _ Mier board -builder at the end of'r :- to raise their productions to meet '� • the boom, Weber leaped onto the thebalsa-wood era, when surfing growing fad of surfing. firstcaughtOII 111 California:, -At the peak, we would turn "'�if out maybe 400 boards a week,' ,Hap Jacobs, Velzy.'""s partner for y awhile, . remembers said soft-spoken master -shaper hers Velzy prom.�r; Harold Iggy from his home on icing the same board to the: sev- the North shore of Oahu. Iggy eral customers. 'There would beet` as responsible for shaping most w Po P Weber boards through.the '60s. --:fights in the,.parking lot ;over_- r _ 'Dewey did a few boards in the boards,' Jacobs said. 'We Couldn't research and development stage, _ but his strength. was in promo - make enough of them ' ��jJr t tion and sales,' I said 'We had shaping machines which would level the boards and cut the rocker. I was the only "one finishing the boards, turning. - 6 the rails and checking for flaws,' Iggy said.•• Dewey had 40 to So dealers all over the East Coast. Mike: Ta- bling was the big rep back there.' '1 don't know about Dewey's ' dark side. His.downfall was he had a lot of shops he gave credit C s to. A lot of shop owners who . owed Dewey money weren't .. .: i paying. I think he had a person- ality just like Dale Velzy. Those two guys were really, hyped -up sales people. They could talk to anybody about anything and get them excited.' :- ' Iggy, who now shapes proto type sailboards for many -times ..I from the sport they loved, surfers to Talbot or other low-overhead Dewey' -had to sell both boards and a life- operations. Talbot bears Weber no grudges 17 style, which translated into waves, hassles and con-. in this eda which ksurf- Sol Mar Hotel, which was some= thing of a stunt. The injury helped crowded frontation in the. water. . radicalsdirection change nkirmish, ng from factory teams and com- keep him out of the water in his Many surfers like Jacobs, 'End- Tess Summer' movie-maker Bruce petition .stripes to soul surfers last years.. In the .'?0s Weber built a'. Brown and Mark Martinson turned and gypsy shapers. was his en sword boat called Avispa to sswordfishng during this pe ; 'ergy, enthusiasm and love of life. and Began spending a Iot ofbine It was. during this - Eddiardalin t, owner of ET Enthusiasm these 1 'That enervous days,' on the water: . on.that his drinking began-to Hermosa, locked Talbot said increase and a lot of old friends hurfbo ca career when Taorns with lboter ewas sellinarly in g ti �Y• When can epeople are, too en- lost contact with him. foam blanks, glass and resin t thusiastic, sometimes it gets them he huge changes in surf shapers. Weber, Bin backyard sh Copeland and other establishe n tr ouble.' 'Dewey was running from some- ing and the crowds be- ' shop-owners saw this as a thre thing,' said Talbot, 'and now he .g an to drive away many Iolder surfers. It was a two-edged to their investments and tried t God bless his soul.' ER anymore.doesn't have to rn sword. In order to make a living, , pressure Walker Foam not to se C= February 13,1995 Mayor Benz and Members of City Council city of Hermosa Beach 1315. Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA, 90254 Dear Mayor and Council Members, : Re: Renaming South Park My understanding is that you will consider renaming South Park, possibly in honor of a deserving individual, at Tuesday night's meeting. Given this possibility, I would like to submit another name for your consideration, that of Clement "Flying Bob" Reinbolt, Hermosa's first citizen. Mr. Reinbolt was not only the first permanent settler, having arrived in Hermosa in 1901; he was also the first city planner, first superintendent, first fire chief (as a volunteer), first plumber, and., most importantly, the city's first baseball captain (having formed our first baseball team in 1906)! Reinbolt brought the first car to Hermosa Beach in 1913, a bright shining red model T Ford, and legend states that he "challenged the waves on his mother's ironing board since surfing had not yet developed!" Having read Patricia Cazin's_;book, Footnotes in the Sand. "Flying Bob" as he was affectionately called, strikes me as a community -minded gentleman, family man (with two sons), and hard-working small : businessman who embraced citizenship and community involvement. It seems to me that in naming a park, we would want to consider our past .and our future. I believe that this colorful fellow is a reflection of our history and hopefully what lies ahead. Thank you, in advance, for considering my recommendation. Sincerely, Karen L. Johnoh 608 Hollowell Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310)379-8893 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ITEM #5: CONSIDERATION OF NAMING SOUTH PARK' "DEWEY WEBER. PARK" January 31, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 14, 1995 Pier Renovation Project (CIP 94-620) Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1; Reject all proposals received for the Pier Renovation Project (CIP 94-620) 2. Approve the award of .contract to prepare architectual, engineering and construction documents for the Pier Renovation Project to a team comprised of Alpha Engineering and IBI Group in the amount of $210,000. 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within 15% of the contract cost. Background: The Hermosa Beach City Council, at their regular meeting of October 25, 1994, approved the schematic design for the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier and directed staff to advertise -and receive proposals for final architectural design and engineering construction documents. On November 23, 1994 the City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department received three proposals for the development of these documents: On December 5, 1994 members of the Pier Committee and City Staff conducted interviews of the prospective consultants. The unanimous decision of the review board was that more proposals were required in order to fully examine the potentials of the project. For this reason it was the opinion of the review committee to readvertise for proposals. The Public Works Department re-released advertisements for proposals and on. January 26, 1995 opened the six responses to the call for proposal. The project teams which responded were as follows: 1. Edward Carson Beall, 2. Alpha Engineering, 3. Moffat & Nichols, 4. David Evans & Associates, 5. Cash & Associates, 6. Gruen & Associates. Analysis: A detailed breakdown of the submitted cost proposals are attached for City Council review. Interviews were held with the five top consulting teams on February 1, 1995. A conference held after the interviews revealed that though there were aspects of each proposal and each team that satisfied the review board, two firms fully met the expectations outlined in the request for proposals. These two engineering firms Alpha Engineering and David Evans call for a more extensive review of the existing condition of the pier, including underwater inspection of the pilings and testing -of the structural integrity of the concrete deck, pile caps, and piles by the taking of concrete samples and borings. The reveiw team felt that these procedures, which were missing from other proposals, were necessary to determine the extent of the damage to the pier so that decisions on the method of repair could be made. Both of these firms also indicated that their proposals included engineering redesign of portions of the approved schematic pier design that they judge to be inappropriately conceived. Of major concern were the I roposed fishing platforms and the method of attachment to the existing pier. These aspects would be studied and corrected as part of their proposals. After much deliberation and additional consideration the Pier Committee has chosen the firm of Alpha Engineering Inc. from El Segundo to be the consulting engineer for the Pier Renovation Project. The selection of a project architect was an equally difficult task. While all five architects were very..qualified, IBI Group from Irvine presented examples of previous exemplary projects which closely relate to the City's needs for the Pier Plaza, Lifeguard Building, and Pier Cafe Structure. Their choice of materials and quality of design sets them.apart. IBI Group has proven their capabilities in their recent preparation of the Downtown Implementation Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. Chosing IBI as the project architect has the additional benefit of creating a continuity in design between the two abutting developments. The Committee therefor suggests that Alpha Engineering team with the IBI Group to prepare the overall plan for the Pier. Alpha Engineering put together a proposal with superior testing procedures, practical engineering answers and an excellent reputation for working with previous clients. The Pier Committee believes that Alpha Engineering would serve the City well as the lead firm on the Pier Renovation Project. The employment -.of IBI Group as the Pier Renovation project architect will insure consistency and quality. The Pier Renovation review committee recommends that the firms Alpha Engineering and IBI Group be awarded the contract to prepare the engineering and construction documents for Phase I of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier Renovation Project. Phase I design includes: repairs to the existing pier structure, design of the, plaza area, and .design of the lifeguard facilities. The cost for such contract .shall not exceed $210,000. Fiscal Impact: The present balance in the Pier Renovation Project (CIP 94-620)is $1.5 million, funded by an allocation from County Proposition A. The preliminary estimated cost. for construction of Phase I of the project (excluding upgrades to the lifeguard facilities) is $1.38 million. It is the recommendation of the review committee to design only that portion of the pier . - renovation for which.funding exists. The $21X0,000 cost to design Phase I of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier Project will leave a balance of $1.3 million in the project. Phase II of the project shall be designed when funded. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Joseph C. Mankawich Amy Amirani Capital Improvement Program Engineer Director of Public Works ' Noted For Fiscal Impact: Mary o Direct6r of Community Resources Viki Copeland Stephen R. ur ell Director of Finance City Manager._ JCM/A/piercc PIER.BID PIER PROJECT BID OPENING JANUARY 26, 1995 AT 2:00 PM Stage I Stage II Total NO. Firm Architect $ $. $ 1 Edward Carson Beall . Anvick .180,220.00 99,325.00 279,545.00 2 Alpha Engineering BPS 233,520.00 94,298.00 327,818.00 3Moffatt And Nichols Kirckpatrick 246,661.00 129,799.00 376,460.00 4 David Evans and Assoc. EHDD 253,144.00 142,276.00 395,420.00 5 Cash and Assoc. IBI 293,332.00 144,900.00 438,232.00 6 Gruen and Assoc. 587,990.00 380,869.00 968,859.00 7 8 9 10 February 7, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 14, 1995 JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (JPA) FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE Recommendation That the City Council provide general direction for Council members and staff to participate in the examination of this approach of providing electrical service and report back to the City Council as the issue develops: Background A number of South Bay cities have begun an effort to determine whether or not a, cost savings could be achieved through "bulk purchase" of electricity and.resold to the consumers at reduced rates. There are a number of items that will be discussed by the group that will determine the direction of the JPA The State Public Utilities Commission is also looking into this area by way of deregulation. The City's participation in the discussion will allow us to be knowledgeable so that the City Council can consider what steps to take should the JPA proceed. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R: Burrell City Manager February 7, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council _ February 14, 1995 DOWNTOWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN INTRODUCTION: This report is. intended to respond to your direction to develop a funding plan for the Downtown Implementation Plan. The recommendations that follow are provided so that the City Council can make the required decisions to move forward with the entire program outlined in the plan. The Downtown Implementation Plan represents the work of a large number of residents, business owners, .council members, commissioners, consultants and city staff over the past three years, beginning with the RUDAT Study. The Downtown Implementation Plan is a broad list of improvements to revitalize downtown Hermosa Beach. This plan, and the funding plan are a point of departure for the future rand, as such, it is important to view the decisions as benchmarks for the next 20 years. The assumption made in developing the funding plan is that the entire $7,000,000 program would be implemented and, as such, funding has been; developed to cover all projected costs. Staff has also included the parking structures in the funding, although they may be funded separately through a possible joint venture. ' The funding plan will bring about some changes, especially in the expansion of parking meters to upper Pier Avenue. Parking meter rates are also proposed to be increased to bring the City in line with rates charged in surrounding areas. Other sources include the use of a Business Improvement Benefit Assessment to carry out long term maintenance once the project is completed. This would ensure that the investments made are protected with required repair and maintenance into the future. The benefiting business and property owners.would be assessed a fee to cover these costs. This district would be formed at the completion of the construction. Once the decisions are made to build the entire plan, I believe the City would be in the position to attract additional businesses of all types. Clearly the additional parking that would be created by the construction of the parking structures would be an important factor in attracting businesses and retaining those that are here now. It is important to keep in mind that staff has considered all reasonable funding sources in making the funding recommendations. Grants, generally speaking, are not available for these types of projects. Business districts generally have ' + I funded parking and improvement projects through assessments, user fees or the City general fund. Staff also looked into the use of oil revenue for some of the work, however, the timing of any revenue from this source is not known and, as a result, was not considered. After reviewing the potential sources, it was concluded that the major available source of revenue would be the parking revenue generated through a rate increase. Without a source of revenue of the size the parking fees would generate, the projects would have to be spread out over a number of years and, I believe, would severely jeopardize the overall program. It appears that the Cit has done *its homework over the last three ears he pp Y Y T improvement plan is solid, buildable and can be financed. The approval of this funding plan and its recommendations will move the City into the next stage of implementing the vision set forth by the community in the RUDAT report. BACKGROUND: On November 22, 1994, the Hermosa Beach City Council, acting, upon the recommendation of the Downtown Enhancement Commission (DEC), approved the Downtown Implementation Plan and directed staff to return to City Council with a funding plan. The following financial strategy represents the culmination of an intense review of the. City's options for funding the Downtown Implementation Plan. Some of the top advisers in the field were consulted to put together a funding plan which is sound and doable. The proposed plan offers the City of Hermosa Beach an opportunity to rehabilitate the entire downtown area in a timely and efficient manner with little imposition on the local citizenry and business owners. , The IBI Group conducted a comprehensive downtown study including, Urban Design, Infrastructure Impact Analysis, Market Study, Funding Study and Parking Study.. As part of the parking study, IBI Group made recommendations to first enhance the existing parking operation of the city and then to increase parking to accommodate future growth. Ernst & Young, as subcontractors to the IBI Group, conducted a fiscal evaluation of the projected improvements to the City of Hermosa Beach's Downtown Area. Their.report assessed potential funding from local, state, and federal sources. It . also developed potential funding strategies and a determination of the City's ability to support debt. Surveys of comparable cities and their funding sources for similar types of projects were also conducted. In addition, there are other projects that the City has initiated which must be coordinated with,the proposed downtown improvements. For example, on Upper 2 Pier Avenue, undergrounding of utilities will occur in FY 1996-97, plans for Upper Pier Improvements must be completed by FY 1996-97 in order to locate the new lighting at the proper location. The phasing of the undergrounding Project will allow the proper coordination. of the downtown improvements. The coordination of the construction of Lower Pier Avenue with the construction of the Pier Plaza portion of the Pier Renovation Project is essential to keeping impacts to businesses in this area to a minimum. Construction of Phase I of the Pier Renovation is scheduled to begin in early 1996. COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS: The following is the total cost for the proposed improvements and cost to carry the debt over a thirty year period, as well as offering a strategy for funding this annual debt service. A: Lower pier Avenue $1,821,000 B: Intersection at Pier $ 464,000 C: Hermosa Avenue from Pier to 16th $1,822,000 D: Upper Pier $1,141,000 E. 'Hermosa Avenue from 8th to Pier $1,322,000 TOTAL: $6,570,000 Bond Administration Fee @ 5% $ 328,500 - TOTAL ;6,898,5.00 At an interest rate of 7.5 % the total annual Debt Service for a total $6.9 million dollar improvement cost is $600,000 for a 30 year amortization. This amount can -change as interest rates fluctuate. REVENUE SOURCES: STRATEGY $ REVENUE 1. Increase the�parking meter fees from $.25 for every $600,000 1/2 hour to $.25 for every 15 minutes: 2. Continue the encroachment permit fee of $.50 per square foot. $ 47,000 3. Upper Pier parking meter Revenue $186,000 _ TOTAL $8333000 3 There are some one-time costs involved in the implementation of this funding strategy, including the recalibration of meters along Lower Pier Avenue and the installation of meters on Upper Pier Avenue. These costs should not exceed $43,000. PARKING STRUCTURES AND RETAIL SPACES: . This report separates parking structure improvements from the downtown street improvements. Parking structures could be constructed with the aid of a partner. Revenues from the parking structures would then be split between the City and the operator. The same is true for retail spaces proposed to be built as part of the parking structures on Lots A&C. Staff is presently involved in preliminary discussions with Los Angeles County as a potential partner for the parking structures. These options will be investigated further and will be brought to City Council at the earliest opportunity. In addition, staff believes that additional parking can be created on upper Pier Avenue. This effort can be started now and will allow continued business growth in this area. FORMS OF FINANCING: Stradling, Yocca, Carlson and Rauth was requested to review the financing options available for improvements proposed in the downtown implementation plan: The improvements would be financed by the issuance of tax exempt securities. The following are some of the.available options: 1. Assessment District - Formed pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 2. Non Profit Corporation 3. Joint Exercise of Powers Authority 4. Formation of Business District - Parking and Business Improvement Law of 1989 The Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 After investigating these four options, it is the opinion of the consultants that the best means of providing for the financing of the improvements would be through the formation of a joint exercise of powers authority. This method avoids the _ assessment of property owners and businesses that formation of these districts would require and the paperwork necessary in creating and maintaining a non- profit corporation. 4 This authority would be created. pursuant to The Joint Exercise of Powers Act, commencing at Section 6000 of the Government Code of the State of California. The two entities creating the joint exercise of powers. authority would be the City and the Parking Authority. The joint exercise of powers authority would then have two ways to issue tax exempt securities. In one, the joint powers authority would agree to construct the improvements and then lease them to the City, the lease would be assigned a trustee who would issue. certificates of participation. The lease payments would be made.by the City annually from any available funds of the City, including parking revenues. The second alternative would be to have the authority issue bonds pursuant to the Marks -Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985, commencing at Section 6584 of the Government Code. The procedure would be similar to that of certificates, except that the joint exercise of powers authority would issue bonds, construct the improvements and lease the improvements to the City. Although both certificates of participation and Marks -Roos bonds have been used to finance similar types of improvements, it is generally up to the underwriter to determine which form of financing is more marketable. The first step would be the formation of the joint exercise of powers authority. This can be done at a City Council meeting and a Parking Authority meeting by each adopting a joint exercise of powers agreement: RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the proposed financing strategy for the funding of the. Downtown Improvement. Such strategy to include: Installation of parking meters on upper Pier Avenue. Changing of parking meter rates to $.25 for 15 minutes to bring Hermosa Beach parking rates into line with the majority of beach cities in the area ® 'Authorization for the City Manager to work with a Bond Council to develop financing method for the Downtown Implementation Plan. (City Manager to return to City,Council for approval of the agreement between the City and Bond Council. a Authorization for the City Manager to negotiate a contract with the IBI Group and return to council with a completed contract for construction drawings and specifications for Upper and Lower Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue (8th Street to 16th Street). s RON PIZER 518 THE STRAND HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 (310) 374 8025 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, ,CA 90254 Subject: Downtown Implementation Plan - Dear Mayor and City Council Members, As a member of the Downtown Enhancement Commission(DEC), 1 am expressing my approvalof the Downtown Implementation Plan recommendation that has been created by Steve Burrell and is scheduled to be presented to you at your regular meeting of February 14, 1995. This Plan is the result of extensive and creative effort by Steve Burrell, City Staff and many outside resources to provide the City of Hermosa Beach with a Plan that is both realistic and in the best interests of the City. I encourage each of you to approve this recommendation as proposed. Best regards, Ron Pizer January 23, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 14, 1995 SUBJECT: SOUTH BAY CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM (MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING) INITIATED BY STAFF Purpose To consider entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (non-binding) with South Bay Cities to facilitate and expand the use of alternative fuels. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (see Attachment A) with other South Bay jurisdictions and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to authorize the participation of the City in the South 'Bay Clean Cities Program. Background 'Two recent Federal laws contain both mandates and incentives for the use of alternative fuels in vehicles. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) require fleets in 22 urban regions to begin operating alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) by,the end of the decade. Beginning in 1998, 30 percent of new vehicle purchases by many fleets must be AFVs.—Additionally, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT) establishes requirements for the purchase of AFVs in both public and private fleets. These requirements begin in 1993 for federal fleets, .1996 for state and fuel supplier fleets, and if necessary, in 1999 for private and municipal fleets. EPACT also provides economic and other incentives for fuel suppliers, original equipment manufacturers and fleet owners. In support of these directives, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has developed Clean Cities, a voluntary federal program designed to accelerate and expand the use of alternative fuel vehicles in communities throughout the country and to provide refueling and maintenance facilities for their operation. The advent of Clean Cities has sparked renewed vigor among local governments and private industry to work collaboratively toward developing new markets for clean fuel technologies. Clean Cities is a comprehensive program designed to assist jurisdictions in achieving a Clean Cities designation. By attaining such status, "Clean Cities" stand to benefit in several ways: • Leverage local AFV purchasing programs against Federal AFV placement; + Gain competitive advantage for Federal funds and grant monies; • Create opportunities for private investment; and - 1 • Receive Federal assistance for public relations, public education and promotional activities. Although not mandated in the recently adopted 1994 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), local governments may opt to implement alternative fuels, and other Advanced Transportation Technologies (ATTs), as alternatives to the current regulatory approaches. These clean fuel Y technologies are generally perceived as more cost-effective than traditional command and control strategies. To date, South Bay jurisdictions generally have very little direct experience with alternative fuels. A surveyof fleet managers. conducted b The Planning Center indicates that while local officials are g Y g becoming more aware of alternative fuels, there remains very limited use of AFVs in existing city j fleets. Analysis Alternativernative fiel technologies represent significant opportunities for local governments to capitalize e i on emerging technology and consumer markets to achieve clean air, mobility and economic objectives both locally and regionally. Presently, we are beginning to see advanced transportation technologies take hold in the South Bay. A joint effort between the City of Torrance and Hughes Power Control Systems has resulted in the nation's first operational standard -size electric bus. This City along with Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach are in the process of acquiring an electric Additionally, of Torrance is working i mined downtown . shuttle to service the combined areas. the City. Y g with Southern California Gas Company to install the subregions first public fueling station for compressed natural gas (CNG): However, for local governments to fully benefit from this growth sector, a much broader market penetration and consumer acceptance of alternative fuels is required. The DOE's Clean Cities Program provides South Bay Cities with an excellent opportunity to1eve rage local resources and to work collectively towards accelerating the use of alternative fuels and alternative fuel vehicles in the South Bay. The opportunity exists to coordinate with the South Bay Cities Association (SBCA) to establish a proactive, multi jurisdictional Clean Cities Program in the South Bay. Such an approach could capitalize on the organizational structure that is in place to facilitate both the planning and fiduciary requirements. It would also enable South Bay Cities to take advantage of the momentum being generated from the current subregional planning process and to more immediately position jurisdictions in the South Bay to benefit from future public and private investment. A regional Clean Cities Program is being developed by SCAG through the Southern California Economic Partnership (The Partnership), a public/private, non-profit organization charged with accelerating the deployment of advanced transportation technologies in the South Coast Air Basin. The South Bay Clean Cities Program will position South Bay Cities to benefit from public/private - investment, and allow cities to participate in the regional program as'it becomes available. 2 Attachment A South Bay Cities Association Sample MOU SOUTH BAY CLEAN CITIES PROGRAMA MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This non-bindingMemorandum of Understanding O is b and among the South Ba stakeholders. g� � Y g in alternative fuels whosemembership may be expanded or may change over time, but at the time this. MOU wasre ared included: P P SOUTH BAY CITIES ASSOCIATION, inclusive of the following participating, jurisdictions i CITY OF CARSON CITY OF EL SEGUNDO CITY OF GARDENA CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY OF INGLEWOOD CITY OF LAWNDALE CITY OF LOMITA CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH CITY OF PALOS VERDES. ESTATES CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY OF REDONDO BEACH CITY OF ROLLING FELLS - CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES CITY OF TORRANCE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY The above federal, state, local and private entities, in the interest of: ■ Reducing the national dependence on imported petroleum for transportation in accordance with the objectives of the Energy Policy Act of 1992; ■ Reducing air pollution caused by using petroleum transportation fuel; ■ Leading and educating the public about alternative fuels and the vehicles that use them; ■ Developing alternative fuels infrastructure(s); ■ Reducing the cost of transportation; t Improving air quality; ■ Contributing to local economic development; will join together, to the " extent fiscally and reasonably practical, to acquire, operate, and maintain alternative fuel vehicles in the South Bay during the forthcoming years. The acquisition of alternative fuel vehicles will be supported by the expansion and distribution of fueling facilities and maintenance services. The Planning Center Pagel December 7,`1994 (` Draft s I South Bay Cities AssocICltion Sample MOU The vehicle fleet operators using alternative fuels will share in data collection and analysis to determine the environmental, economic and performance attributes of their alternative fuel vehicles. Funding and or services for this project will be contributed by the signing parities in a manner adequate to achieve the "Schedule of Responsibilities" that are summarized on Attachment 1 and herein incorporated. The signers will also attempt to leverage additional resources for alternative fuel vehicles to be operated in the South Bay by recruiting other public and private entities not included by signature hereon. The signing parties will provide direction and define the objectives of this project through an Executive ` Committee comprised of all signers. This MOU shall become effective upon the latter date of signature of the parties and shall remain in effect for a period of S years, upon which the MOU becomes eligible for renewal. The Planning Center Page 2 December 7, 1994 s Draft South. Bay Cities Association ` Sample MOU Attachment 1 SOUTH BAY CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM SCHEDULE OF RESPONSIBILITIES The followin outline identifies the non-binding responsibilities of the various stakeholders in the South g g P Bay Clean Cities program: Bay • i 1. South BY Cities Association n Provide chairperson and other support members for the Executive Committee. ■ Serve as fiscal agent for federal and state grants. ■ Provide leadership and assistance in public education activities. 2. Member Cities K Acquire and operate alternative fuel vehicles (AFV's). ■ Finance, within resources, the acquisition of City -owned AFV's ■ Convert existing fleet vehicles to alternative fuels as appropriate. ■ Accumulate and maintain data on the environmental and economic impact/benefits of AFV's. -- 3. U.S.. Department of EnergySan Francisco Support Office s Provide a vice chairperson for the Executive Committee. u Provide resources for assistance in project management. ® Assist in the analysis of related data. Provide technical assistance and. economic/environmental input as well as other information in support of AFV's. s Serve as a catalyst to involve other fleet operators. 4. CAISTART - n Provide a member to serve on the Executive Committee. , ■ Provide marketing support for expanded use of AFV'S. ■ Provide technical assistance and economic/environmental input as well as other information in support of AFV's. ■ Serve as catalyst to involve other fleet operators. ■ Provide assistance in public education activities. 5. General Services Administration ■ Acquire and operate, where appropriate, GSA AFV's in the South Bay Cities. mProvide assistance �I in public education activities. ■ Provide technical and management assistance to other fleet operators. 6. County of Los Angeles u Participate in joint efforts with the SBCA to convert existing fleet vehicles to AFV's. ■ Assist in the promotion of other governmental agencies in the use of. AFV's. s Arrange, when practical, for AFV's, particularly those fueled by compressed natural gas, to be assigned to the South Bay Cities. n Consider AFV purchasing in the South Bay subregion. i The'Planning 9 `P annin Center Page 3 December 7, 1994 Draft SOUTH BAY CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM PURPOSE PRINCIPLES To respond to federal mandates and incentives for the use of n Foster economic development in the South Bay by placing the subregion at the forefront of Advanced alternative fuels by undertaking a proactive, multi -Jurisdictional Transportation Technology applications and positioning the South Bay to capitalize on the growth of Clean Cities program in the South Bay. new and emerging Industries. ■ Foster economic development in the South Bay by making the subregion attractive to private Investment and creating opportunities for public/private partnership. a Pursue air quality and economic development objectives through strategies and programs that achieve maximum leverage of local government resources, while minimizing costs. SOUTH BAY CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM GOAL POLICIES -_.-PROGRAM OPTIONS I. Increase the acquisition and A. Support the expansion and/or 1. Assess existing AFV market situation to determine current penetration levels and the potential utilization of Alternative Fuel conversion of city fleet vehicles to increase AFV use. Vehicles (AFVs). to alternative fuels. 2. Develop an alternative fuel vehicle program that will guide AFV acquisition and conversion by considering various factors, including; • Emissions Reduction Potential • Vehicle Purchase"asing Costs •. Vehicle Conversion Costs • Operation and Maintenance Costs • Vehicle Performance and Reliability • Fueling Site Installation and Operational Costs _ • Safety, Health and Environmental Requirements 3. Identify optimum vehicle types Q.e. cars, vans, pick-up trucks, sport/utility trucks, shuttle. buses, transit buses, etc.) for conversion to alternative fuels. 4. Obtain Clean Cities Designation for the South Bay in order to leverage local AFV purchasing programs with the Federal AFV Placement Program. 5. Establish a feasible target Q.e. 96 of existing fleet or new purchases) and a realistic implementation timetable for fleet expansion/conversion to alternative fuels. I6. Initiate a Funding Identification Program to Identify public and private funding opportunities for AFV conversion. B. Support the creation of incentive 1. Work with the League of California Cities to promote Clean Cities legislation, including tax measures for expanded use of credits for the purchase or conversion of new AFVs. AFVb at all .levels of government. If. Develop alternate fuel supply A. Encourage the provision of 1. Identify potential sites for recharging and refueling stations in the South Bay. Infrastructure and vehicle public AFV recharging/ refueling conversion, maintenance and sites in the South Bay. 2. Develop model City codes, ordinances and policies for consideration by South Bay service Industries. jurisdictions. SOUTH BAY CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM GOAL POLICIES PROGRAM OPTIONS III. Advance public understanding A. Coordinate public education 1. Publicize developments related to alternative fuels and the South Bay Clean Cities Program In of the benefits and costs of programs to promote the use of the South Bay newsletter. using alternative fuels in motor AFVs, vehicles. 2. Provide timely reports on AFV developments and the South Bay Clean Cities Program via local information dissemination vehicles, including: • City Newsletters • Chamber of Commerce Publications • Local Cable Television Stations • Employer Newsletters • On-Line Bulletin Boards and Network Services B. Facilitate local government 1. Implement an AFV Demonstration Program to provide local officials with opportunities to test' exposure to alternative fuel drive AFVs. technologies. 2. Work with AFV manufacturers and distributors to establish an AFV loan program for South Bay jurisdictions. 3. Provide AFV exhibit at South Bay Clean Air Workshop to give local officials and staff first. hand viewing opportunities. C. Coordinate a media relations 1. Issue press releases and media advisories to publicize the South Bay Clean Cities Program. effort to facilitate media coverage of alternative fuel I 2. Invite the media to attend the Clean Cities component of the South Bay Clean Air Workshop. developments.