The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/01/95AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING-OFTHE HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 1, 1995 - Council Chambers, City Hall 7:00 p.m CALL TO ORDER 7' PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL J4 qJ )1L1-41"4-1" PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. PRELIMINARY BUDGET REVIEW OVERVIEW OF BUDGET CHANGES. OVERVIEW OF REVENUE CHANGES REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES CITt7FN COMMENTS ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on May 1, 1995. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR: PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 Agency Negotiator. Stephen Burrell Employee Organization: Hermosa Beach Management Association 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a): Case Name: Case Number. Aurora Canillo v. City of Henuoss Beach YCO20233, Superior Court - Torrance CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- INITIATION OF LITIGATION: PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(c): Number of potential mases: 1 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT NOTE: THIS MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED LIVE ON MULTIVISION CABLE CHANNEL 3. CLOSED SESSION HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 'l, 1995 i CALL TO ORDER: 9:50pm ROLL CALLI PRESENT: BENZ, BOWLER, REVICZKY, EDGERTON ABSENT: OAKES 1: MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on May 1, 1995.' CONFERENCE WITH' LABOR NEGOTIATOR: PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6': Agency Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organization Hermosa Beach Management Association CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION• PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a): Case Name: Case Number: Aurora Carrillo v City of Hernnosa Beach YCO20233, Superior Court = Torrance 4 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION: PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION,, 54956.9(c): Numberof potential cases: '1 RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION 1024pm ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS NONE ADJOURNMENT::10:25pm BUDGET MEMO NOTES CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NOTES. CITY COUNCIL NONE - FUNDS ARE BUDGETED THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH FOR LEAGUE OF CITIES, ETC. CITY ATTORNEY NONE,- $10,000 OUT OF ONGOING WORK FOR SAVINGS. COULD ACTUALLY BE MORE. CITY MANAGER NONE - FUNDS COVER ICMA, LEAGUE ANNUAL AND CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT MEETINGS . PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES. $55,000 EST. AVAILABLE. CITY CLERIC6,200 4� pq ,4'° t j RECORDS. MANAGEMENT ELECTIONS - COST MAY NOT BE ENOUGH. CHECK FOR COUNTY ESTIMATE. MAYBE CAN BE DONE FOR JitLESS WITH PRIVATE CONTRACTOR. CITY PROSECUTOR FUNDS FOR TRAINING AND CONFERENCES ARE INCLUDED PER CONTRACT POLICE EQUIPMENT 5401- $16,700 REPLACEMENT OF VESTS (33 VESTS) $15,000 K-9 EQUIPMENT $500 CASSE! h RECORDERS $1,200 5402 - $18,000 IDENTI-KIT $2,500 IDENTI-CARD SYSTEM $2,500 JAIL MICROWAVE $1,000 SINK IN JAIL CELL $1,000 JAIL CAMERAS $3,000 STROBE LIGHT SYSTEM REPLACE $500 TARGET SYSTEM $5,000 TV FOR TRAINING $2,500 HANDHELD RADIOS RESERVES ? 5403 3 NEW PATROL VEHICLES $70,796 CHIEF'S CAR $24,356 VEHICLE SET-UP $10,500 $105,652 DROP CHIEFS CAR FOR NOW -25.000 $80,652 COMMUNITY SERVICES 5403 DIVISION TRUCK REPLACEMENT $17,400 ELECTRIC VEHICLE (G04) AQMD $19,500 CITY TREASURER NONE FINANCE CONTRACT FOR CONTROLLER'S REPORT, STREET REPORT ETC. SOFTWARE FOP:RECEIPTS PROGRAM -`DATA PROC. PERSONNEL NONE - INCLUDES REPORT FOR APPRAISAL OF CITY HOLDINGS GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS 5402 LEASE TWO NEW COPY MACHINES FIRE FIRE CHIEF DROP VEHICLE FOR NOW TOTAL EQUIPMENT $25,100 COMPUTERS, HEART MONITOR, SAFETY GEAR, 7 APPARATUS BOTTLES PUBLIC WORKS PARKS DIVISION (6101): NEW DUMP TRUCK $35,680 ADMINISTRATION DIVISION (4202): FAX MACHINE $700 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT $6,200 TRAINING $200 DESK CHAIR $300 CONSULTANT $10,000 SEWERS & STORM DRAINS DIVISION (3102) HYDRO FLUSHING CONTRACTOR $65,000 HYDRO VIDEO FOR EMERGENCIES $1,000 UPDATING NEW SEWER LINES IN THE SEWER MASTER PLAN $8,000 DESK CHAIRS FOR SEWER CREW (2) $750 CAMERA FOR SEWER CREW $200 SEWER PIPE COUPLER FIXTURES $2,000 NIGHT LIGHTS, 1/2" DRILL ELECTRIC MOTOR, BArrERY DRILL $800 SAND BAGS $1,000 PUCIPIPEIFITTINGS/VALVES/DIRT/ SAFETY EQUIPMENT/GLASS $10,000 STORM DRAIN MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT $13,760 SANTA MONICA GRANT CONTRACT $5,000 STREET LIGHTING DIVISION (2601) NONE MEDIANS DIVISION (3101) NONE EQUIPMENT SERVICE DIVISION (4205) INDUSTRIAL WASTE REMOVAL $3,500 INCREASE PERMITS $3,600 BUILDING MAINTENANCE (4204) HEATER FOR BASE III $3,200 NEW ROOF AT BOWLING GREEN $2,300 STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION NONE i TRAFFIC SAFETY DIVISION EQUIPMENT: SAND BLASTER/HOOD LINE STRIPER $600 $1,000 BUDGRPT1 05/15/95 15:59 001 GENERAL FUND -1100 LEGISLATIVE 1121 CITY CLERK 4100 .PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4180. RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE'BENEFITS 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL, SERVICES 4200 - CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 7,752 22,200 2,884 22,200 6,200 CONTRACT SERVICES. 7,752 22,200 2,884 22,200 6,200 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE PREPARATION WORKSHEET. 1995-96 FINAL PRELIMINARY 1993-94 1994-95 EXPENDED TOTAL BDGT 1994-95 EXPEND YTD YEAR END EST DEPT REQUEST (THRU FEB) 1994-95 1995-96 33,578 35,310 23,444 35,607 37,862 :1,766 471 1,766 1,766 15,510 16,956 11,300 17,092 .17,376 6,766 . 4,498 6,822. 7,380 6,180 3,990 5,575 4,765 - 712 758 511 771 801 49,800 67,736 44,214 67,633 69,950 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 586 625 � I 90 625 625 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,922 4,014 li 1,694 4,014 2,214 4315 MEMBERSHIP 220 250 195 250 250 4316 TRAINING. 300 300 4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 450 424 450 450 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 7,898 9,000 5,082 9,000 9,000 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 2,520 .1,868 1,248 1,868 1,868 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 13,146 16,507 9,033 16,507 14,407 5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE CITY CLERK 23,053 17,799 23,053 17,799 129,496 73,930 BUDGRPT1 05/15/95 15:59 4100 4112 4189 001 1100 1122 GENERAL FUND LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS PERSONAL SERVICES PART TIME/TEMPORARY MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT. CONTRACT SERVICES 4300 4304 4305 4316 4317 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER TELEPHONE OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES TRAINING CONFERENCE/TRAINING MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ELECTIONS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE PREPARATION WORKSHEET 1995796 FINAL PRELIMINARY 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 EXPENDED TOTAL BDGT EXPEND YTD YEAR. END EST DEPT REQUEST (THRU FEB) 2,797 41 2,838 622 30,985 31,607 1,120 85 1,205. 1,500 16,000 17,500 2 72 1,175 1,500 150 200 450 1,327 2,222 35,772. 20,927 1,120 85 1,205 1,500 5,613 -16,000 5,613 17,500 470 424 894 6,507 72 1,500 200 450 2,222 1,120 r 85 1,205, 1,500 51,000122,1 52,500.7.--4,0„.&.�L7 72 r(a 9 eE i)) 1,500 C� �` 200 450 2,222 20,927 .55,927 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET 1994-1995 DEPARTMENT City Clerk/Administration & Records SOURCE OF FUNDS: General Fund DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The City Clerk is the custodian of City records and keeper of the City Seal. Among statutory duties are: conducting elections; recording proceedings of Council meetings; publishing and posting legal notices; maintaining City Code books; serving as filing officer for City (Conflict of Interest forms and campaign statements); and serving as Fair Political Practices Commission filing official. POSITION SUMMARY DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER OBJECT AUTHORIZED RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATION CODES 94-95 95-96 95-96 4102 REGULAR SALARIES Deputy City Clerk TOTALS 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY City Clerk TOTALS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t00 1.00 1.00 1.00 OBJECT ACCOUNT CODES TITLE OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS EXPLANATION 4180 Retirement Effective fiscal year 94/95, retirement costs will be departmentalized. Prior year expenses were centralized in the retirement department. 4188 Employee Benefits Effective fiscal year 94/95, employee benefit costs will be departmentalized. Prior year expenses were centralized in the employee benefit department. 4201 Contract Services/Private Municipal and Zoning Code supplements ($4,000), State Code supplements and reprints ($2,000), storage of microfilm off-site ($100), office equipment maintenance ($100). 4305 Office Operating Supplies Includes funds for printing, envelopes and postage for various mailings; audio and video tapes; copying costs; record management and retention supplies and general office supplies ($2,700) OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS OBJECT ACCOUNT EXPLANATION CODES TITLE 4315 Membership International Institute of Municipal Clerks and California City Clerks Association ($300) 4316 Training Southern California City Clerks Association meetings ($400) 4317 Conference Annual City Clerk's State Conference ($650) 4323 Public Noticing Includes legal advertisements for notice of public hearings, appeals, bids, request for proposals, and publication of City Ordinances ($10,000) f:b95\clkbdgt.doc CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET 1994-1995 DEPARTMENT City Clerk/Elections SOURCE OF FUNDS: General Fund DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION: The City Clerk is charged with conducting all City elections, including the processing of initiative, referendum and recall petitions. In consolidated municipal elections, the City Clerk coordinates with the County and is responsible for performing the tasks associated with candidates and ballot measures, which include publishing required notices and processing nomination papers, candidate statements, ballot arguments and rebuttals, financial statements, campaign expenditure statements, and other related matters. OBJECT CODES POSITION SUMMARY AUTHORIZED 94-95 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 1.00 TOTALS DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDATION 95-96 95-96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 OBJECT CODES 4112 4201 4251 4305 OBJECT CODE EXPLANATIONS ACCOUNT TITLE Part Time/Temporary Contract Services/Private Contract Services /Government Office Operating Supplies 4316 Training 4317 Conference EXPLANATION One month part time, 20 hours per week, needed approximately 90 days before election ($1,120) Election information and consultation ($1,500) Election consolidation with Los Angeles County for Municipal Election ($45,000) Includes funds for printing, envelopes and postage for various mailings; manual preparation and copying; and, general office supplies ($1,750) Elections law seminar ($300) Annual Election and Registration Officials State Conference ($650) f:b95/clkbdgt.doc -�- 9 5 Cc ) Z op S l �X J !Y 7 .4, 4, ,r 4.-- •=1 0:_e2:73 ! 2 .) • ti e/1/„.--2/ L_6) ((.9%-Z•3 � �n 7S-7Gv 1/ir u-( T a �--- 6461 -CS ft47;4.--1 434.;fakLge.r _d)2egiwi4tt, AGU-Mtetatf,c.. cf -- P-' 9.6-o 4114,i41, -Ler— -� f cZulen M� __- P._ C- ott-xLifxd � C� AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 8, 1995 - Council Chambers, City Hall 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER q: 10 PH. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE e ROLL CALL c)cele-5 Re-ot;-#1 Re -r - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. 1. PRELIMINARY BUDGET REVIEW a. OVERVIEW OF BUDGET CHANGES. b. OVERVIEW OF REVENUE CHANGES c. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES 2. CITIZEN COMMENTS Arzz ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on May 1, 1995. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR: PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 Agency Negotiator: Stephen Burrell Employee Organization: Hermosa Beach Management Association ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 1 Q NOTE: This meeting will be televised live on MultiVision Cable Channel 3. CAA June 8, 1995 Budget Workshop Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: We are are still in the dark about the shortfall referenced by the City Manager in the budget pre- amble. -- re amble.- He cites no specific amount, not even a specific year. Since it causes the elimination of 1 � positions and 9 employees, we feel that we have the right to an accounting of the expenditures which he has not explained in any Evenmore importantly, we need this information" to prepare alternatives to the present budget This leads me to comment on budgets in general. As we all know, families (and cities), receiving exactly the same amount of income (revenue) can spend it very differently, depending on their differing needs and priorities. We feel that many expenditures in this budget that increase salaries and buy new equipment not only do not result in better or increased service but actually cripple, - either directly or indirectly, the City's day to day ability to function and provide necessary. services to its citizens. To see how our total budget in fact didr``look", I made A pie graph ofour proposed expenditures using the same categories as Manhattan Beach's pie graph. As you see our top priority is CIPs. 'It is more than 1/3 of the entire budget at $6,568,85.4. How- ever, none of the funding comes from the General Fund and most of the funding sources can only be uses for improvements, not maintenance. However, our residents still need and request on- going maintenance which is done for themost part by Public Works crews.. Just 5 months into ,the year (starting in January), 890 service requests have been made; these are additional to normal daily maintenance duties. Given the needs of citizens and the restrictions on the funding, employ- ees still see this as an example of how appropriations could be allocated differently. Rarely, if ever, are the entire appropriations for CIPS fully expended. Employees wonder if returning just $100,000 - $150,000 of revenue back to the General Fund is possible;(from a total $800,000 to be transferred to the Sewers and Storm Drains). Doing so would retain jobs while not slashing deeply into the $4,561,028 total revenue available from the Sewer Fund (pg.7 of budget). The Police Dept. appropriation provides an even better example. After CIPS it is the second highest priority: Excluding Crossing Guards, their total appropriation is $5,930,126 (nearly 6 million dollars). This includes.2 promotions (Sgt. to Lt.) and 3 new vehicles (budgeted at $80,652).. This seemed like a lot of money and so a check was made with the Manhattan Beach P.D. budget to see how we compared. Two interesting facts emerged. 1. Although our city is approximately 1/3 the size of Manhattan Beach (in terms of total area to be policed) our Police Dept.'s budget is approximately 2/3 the size of Manhattan. Beach ($9,379,600). 2. The ratio ofour supervisors* to officers is much higher than in Manhattan Beach at 1 su- pervisor to 2.5 officers (H.B) vs 1 supervisor to 4 officers in Manhattan Beach. *Supervisors are defined as Sgts., Lts., Capts. and Chiefs in both cities. Hour Police budget was 1/3 that of Manhattan Beach, it would be approximately $3,100,000. Even taking away $500,000 to $900,000 would leave them from $5,530,126 to $5,030,126, still. the second largest appropriation by a large margin. • These are only a few examples and the kinds of things we want our representatives to sit down and look at with the City Manager and Finance Director. Revisions may be required of this budget in any event since the total expenditures by department total (after several checks) and the total appropriation are different. Adding each expenditure by department the total is $20,517,195 which does not match the $19,820,810 shown as total appropriation. With regard to employee quality of work I have this to say. First, there probably are bad apples amongst us but that is,up ..to management to correct. It is rarely done, but it has been done, both in the Building Dept.- and very recently, in Public Works. Finally in closing, I: remind the City Council that in _ 1992-93, the City received and expended ., $864,275; from PBRS, AB702., As..youwill note, in the attached Bill Text,. Section 42, it is stated that "In_expending any; savings which accrue to _public Employees' Retirement System employers as a. result. of the; repealof the retirement allowance adjustment. programs...employers shall give the highest priority (italics mine) to retaining or rehiring -as manyas possible of those...members subject. to layoff or reduction." Exactly $33,033 (or 3.5%) of that $864,275 was expended to fund employee positions until 6/30/93. The City Manager at that time (when all Southern Calif cities felt that they had fallen half way down a cliff) involved employees from the outset, pre- sented a detailed picture ofthe problem and offered a rational and a clear plan which, as explicitly stated, would, with minorr tweaks take us through the:10,year long recession as. seen by that City Manager. For those_reasons, Hermosa Beach employees did not demand (nor receive) as did Tor- rance employees any disbursement of this money or insist that;the remainder be set aside for a night like tonight. Given that trust and this result, I know I speak for every single employee when I say you owe us a chance to produce an alternative that neither cuts jobs - or services. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH :,LUSE OF FUNDS . r ;; 19,820,810 27,517,195) ,1995-96 Police -: 25% Finance 3% Legal/Admin Fire HE Public Works Finance Public Works 12% PIEBUD.XLS •. DESCRIPT. AMOUNT Approp. Shown Actual Approp. % of Bud. Non Dept. 239,413 19,820,810 20,517,195 t-: 1.2% Recreation 683,050 .19,820,810 20,517,195 . 3.3% Com. Develop 772,003 19,820,810 20,517,195 3.8% Police Dept. 5,092,712 19,820,810 20,517,195 24.8% Legal/Admin. . 846,421 -19,820,810 20,517,195 4.1% Personnel 1,296,235 19,820,810 20,517,195 6.3% Fire Dept. • •1,969,646 19,820,810 20,517,195 9.6% Public Works 2,400,206 19,820,810 20,517,195 11.7% Finance 648,655 19,820,810 20,517,195 .. 3.2% CIPs 6,568,854 19,820,810 20,517,195 32.0% 20,517,195 19,820,810 100.0% -696,385 • Display 1991-1992 Bill Text INFORMATION .BILL 'NUMBER: AB 702 BILL TEXT . PAGE 12 __(b)__The' Legislature,:_finds anddeclares that this Section vill not affect the soundness .of the -Public -Employees' Retirement Fund, in that the change to semiannual=payments is.on-:a_one-time basis and any resulting loss to that fund vill be accounted_ forby_.incre_ased employer contributions in subsequent years SEC. 34:=Section:.:20754 of.the:Government Code is amended to read: 20754,_:._The_:board shal]. certify to the Controller at the end of each _ quarter or.semiannual:__period, as appropriate, the total amount of compensation in respect -to -which state contributions are payable from the General Fund and each other fund in_theState. Treasury, and the Controller shall thereupon transfer..the _.s.tate.'.s contribution from each fund, respectively, to the Retirement..:F.und :.._Compensation shall .be included in the .certification at the end o.f__the__montLaniwh, ch__the...xmemb.er.'.s_contributions based upon it are:paid. SEC. 35. Section 21235 of the Government Code is repealed. SEC. 36. Section 21235.5 is added to the Government Code, to read: 21235.5. (a)'On an annual' basis, the board shall transfer the lessor of: (1) the. amount -necessary to increase all monthly allowances paid by the system to 75 percent of the. purchasing pover of the Initial. monthly allowances; or (2) up to 1.1 percent of the.net earnings on member contributions, as' determined by Section 20132.6, to a supplemental account. (b) The:'funds so transferred to the supplemental account shall be utilized to increase all. monthly allowancespaid by the system up to a maximum of 75 percent of the purchasing power, as determined by the actuary, of the initial monthly allovances.that vere received by every retired person -or survivor or beneficiary of a state, school or local member or retired person who vas eligible to receive any allovance at the end of each fiscal year. Funds remaining in the account after the paymentof benefits under this section. shall be transferred to the employer accounts. SEC.. 37. Section 21236 of the -Government Code is repealed. SEC. 38. Section 21236.5 is added to the Government Code, to read: 21236.5. If a court ofcompetent jurisdiction, from which all appeals are • final, holds that Section 20131.-01 is invalid, Section 21235.5 shall become inoperative. SEC. 39. Section 21237 of the Government Code is repealed. SEC. 40. Section 21238 of the Government Code is repealed. SEC. 41. Section 22825.15 is added to the Government. Code, to read: - 22825.15. (a) Notvithstanding Section -22825.1,- the employer's_contribution vith respect to each excluded employee as,defined-by subdivision (b) of Section 3527 who is othervise eligible shall be .determined by the Department of Personnel Administration subject. to the appropriation of funds by the Legislature in the Budget Act. - lb) •Notvithstanding Section 22825.1 or any other. provision of law, the employer's contribution with respect to -each state employee, as defined by subdivision (c)*of Section 3513`vho is othervise eligible, shall -be determined through the collective bargaining process subject to the appropriation of funds by the, Legislature in the Budget Act. SEC. 42. In expending any savings which accrue to Public Employees' Retirement System employers as a result of the repeal of the retirement allovance adjustment programs established pursuant to Sections 21235, 21236, 21237, -and 21238 of the Government Code, the state, school districts, cities, counties, local districts, agencies, and any other Public Employees' Display 1991-1992 Bill Text - INFORMATION BILL NUMBER: AB 702 PAGE 13. r BILL TEXT Retirement System employers, shall'give the highest priority to retaining or rehiring as iany as possible of those Public Employees'. Retirement System members subject.to layoffor reduction. SEC. 42.5. Notwithstanding Section 3.60 of the Budget Act of 1991, if funds remaining in the Investment Dividend Disbursement Account, the Purchasing Pover'Accounts, and the Extraordinary Performance. Dividend Account in the Public Employees' Retirement Fund are used to reduce employer contributions - pursuant, to Section 20131.01 of the Government Code, funds appropriated in Items 0110-001-001, 0120-011-001, and'0160=.001-001 of Section 2.00 of the - Budget Actof1991 and Section. 33,.50 of the Budget Act of 1991 shall not be reduced pursuant to Section 3.60 of the Budget Act of 1991 or any other provision,: of -lav SEC. 43-. This act is an urgencf statute necessary -for the immediate preservation of the public peace,: health,or safety vithin the meaning of. Article.Illof the Constitution and shall go into .immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are: The projected shortfall between General' Fund revenues and expenditures of ;= $14.3 billion for the 1991-92 fiscal year constitutes a genuine fiscal emergency, therefore this act must take effect immediately in order to ensure. the continuation of essential governmental services. those Public Employees'" Retirement System mem- bers subject to layoff or reduction."; asked that the :employees be a part of the decision ;process in cutting expenses Shirley' Cassell ''611 Monterey Blvd., said the money_ from AB702 was employee money refunded -from ."PERS and it. did not belong to the City; `said 'the money should be used for the employees and not to buy other things; Terry Bindman - employee, urged the Council to reconsider a one time expense of $33,000 from- thePNrRS-refund to save the people" subject tot==e yo mtiI %the -end of the fiscal year; said. tip S_ ?1-3 3% -..would buy time for the em-=` xy l eeo=-look_ for other jobs and to put their -: _affairs:-= inn" -order, felt the City should give peapTe much notice as possible;' and, Geine.Dreher .- 1222 Seventh Place, said there was a. need to change the structure of the City and the focus should be .on what -was needed for Her- mosa "Beach; said he believed in -:team management and the City needed to have as many people as - possible involved in reducing costs. Proposed -Action: To approve staff recommendations no. 2 (reduce City Council salary'by 50% for May and June) and no. 3 (reduce. the City Clerk salary by 5% for April, May and June). Motion Essertier. The motion died due to the lack of a, _second. Proposed Action: To use AB702 (PERS refund) funds to the extent of $30,500 to fund positions until June 30, 1993. Motion Mayor Wiemans,,second Edgerton. `Action:, The above motion was amended by the maker and the second to use AB702 monies to fund to the extent of $33,033 for salaries until June 30, 1993. :Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. The motion car- ried, noting -the dissenting vote of Essertier and the absence of Midstokke. 9. REQUEST BY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO USE THE WAVE VEHICLES TO HELP TRANSPORT PERSONS BETWEEN THE FIESTA DE LAS ARTES AND THE REMOTE PARKING AREAS. Memorandum from Planning 'Director Michael Schubach dated March 2, 1993. (Continued from 3/9/93 meeting.') Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report, and responded to Council questions Coming forward to address the.Council on this item were: Carol Hunt --' Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce, said that any misunderstanding` City Council Minutes 03-23-93 Page 8108 AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 22, 1995 Council Chambers, City Hall 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER 7,o5 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ,K��'411'`,�°`� ROLL CALL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. PRELIMINARY BUDGET REVIEW a. OVERVIEW OF BUDGET CHANGES. b. OVERVIEW OF REVENUE CHANGES c. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES CITIZEN COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT 5,37 NOTE: This meeting will be televised live on MultiVision Cable Channel 3. )-- 1 e, , _ (,Ly ,.-- , .2-, 3 iY- 6_____ __ - ,-- )_._.:2,_____2 _, �d r ,-,r, _...______e, y.� , (7- ,-..-.)) ,_____ ( _ ( - - e . , - - - ,„, -, ( a 7 G "7 0 4-4 4 #.0c7(/ �'' en/ 'v V 7 4'' (2„ ��=3