Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03/12/96
• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, C lifornia, held on Tuesday, March 12, 1996, at the hour of 7:0 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - ROLL CALL: Present: Bette, Absent: Nene ANNOUNCEMENT: I 1:0o A M. t-.duta Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler tz1- . - q (sr ORD. -96 -/ /s s+��f Jaffe Q.44 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. A,. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be. heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens may also speak: during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management of departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: //// stein ` L 1 15 - - q(e -R-p- City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9047 • At 7: P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting with item 4. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. Councilmember requests to remove items from the consent calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) and the public may comment on the Consent Calendar items that have not been removed at this time. • Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (m), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (a) Reviczky, Motion j R , second Jo . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular meeting held on February 27, 1996. 3 upplemental memorandum and amended page 9040 from City 4/.*°S Clerk's Office dated March 12, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky at the request of the City Clerk's Office for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 27, 1996 as amended on page 9040, item 1(e) to show the adoption of A Resolution/ 149. g6-s1/qL1. JIB/SE- • (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 6103 THROUGH 6281 INCLUSIVE,NOTING VOIDED CHECK NO. 6170. City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9048 • • • Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CONTINUED UTILIZATION OF THE SOUTH BAY PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL FOR DELIVERY OF LOCAL JOB TRAINING PROGRAMS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 29, 1996. Action: To app - _ the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. , entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF - ITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, URGING LOCAL GOVERANCE OF JOB TRAINING PROGRAMS BY THE SOUTH BAY PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL." (e) RECOMMENDATION TO SET WORKSHOP DATES OF THURSDAY, MAY 23, 1996 AND THURSDAY, JUNE 6, 1996 AT 7:00 PM FOR REVIEW OF THE 1996-97 BUDGET. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 29, 1996. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to set the dates of Thursday., May 23, 1996, and Thursday, June 6, 1996 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. for review of the Fiscal Year 1996-97 budget. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY 5F' COMMISSION MEETIN OF FEBRUARY 21. 1996. `- did/la. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to_receive and file the action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 21, 1996. Movuthitsvi-- ,hasp RA City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9049 • (g) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC FOR THE USE OF ROOM 11 IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 29, 1996. ********* Action: To approve the Park, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to: 1) approve the one-year lease agreement between the South Bay Free Clinic and the City for the use of Room 11 in the Community Center at a rate of $372 per month (400 sq.ft. X $.93 per sq.ft.) from April 1, 1996 through June 30, 1996, and at the rate per month in accordance with poicy at that time from July 1, 1996 through March 31, 1997 for an estimated total rental income of $4,464; and, 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the lease. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PRIORITY LIST FOR RECREATION FACILITY CIP'S AND THE PARK MASTER PROCESS. Memorandum from Community Resources ary Rooney dated March 4, 1996. PARK AND PLANNING Director This item was jremoved from the consent calendar by Councilmember OikkESfor separate discussion later in the meeting. W/ - Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendations of: 1) the priority list for park and recreation facility CIPs; and, r-- 1) the park master planning process as outlined by staff. Motion .0 , second J . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9050 • (i) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO GILLS AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS TO PREPARE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER REMODEL, CITY HALL REMODEL AND ADA REOOIREMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,790.00 AND AUTHORIZE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO ALLOW MINOR CHANGES WITHIN THE BUDGETED AMOUNT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 4, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) award the professional services contract to Gills and Associates Architects to prepare construction documents and specifications for City Council chamber remodel, City Hall remodel and ADA requirements, in the amount of $42,700; and, 2) authorize the Director of Public Works to allow minor changes within budget. Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (j) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR THE FORMATION OF THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DURING FY 1996-97. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 5, 1996. 9649( Action: To approve- he staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 6-5791, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4, CHAPTER 1, PART 2 OF —LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 197211, BEING DIVISION 15, STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF OR PLANTING LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING FIXTURES. APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9051 • WORK AND THE MAINTENANCE THEREOF IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1996 -AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1997.HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1996-1997." (k) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE REOUEST FROM SOUTH BAY COALITION FOR A ONE (1) MONTH EXTENSION TO LEASE ROOM 4 IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO SIGN AMENDMENT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 5, 1996. - Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve the one month extension to the lease agreement between South Bay Coalition and the City of Hermosa Beach for Room 4 in the Community Center for an amount of $742 (798 sq.ft. X $.93); and, 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the amendment. (1) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE EASEMENT AGREEMENT GRANTING LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THEIR RECENTLY INSTALLED OBSERVATION WELL LOCATED AT 24TH STREET AND THE GREENBELT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 5, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember for separate discussion later in the meeting. CM OD'l E) Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the easement agreement which grants the Los Angeles County Flood Control district rights of ingress and egress to its recently installed observation well located at 24th Street an he Greenbelt Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9052 • c (m) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 6, 1996 Reentel .Tr -01) • — R. 46-e6 cottit 4 04.4;4 ottet Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the action minutes of the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission for the regular meeting of March 6, 1996. Go/e) At, it a 44/ce- 3-/k-"(go 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 96-1152 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. CALIFORNIA. TO AMEND THE R-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 4-3(12) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO MAKE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE A PROPORTION OF LOT SIZE (10%) AND TO MODIFY THE EXCEPTION FOR LOTS OF 2500 SQUARE FEET OR LESS, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 4, 1996 and memorandum requesting clarification of previous Council action from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 5, 1996. c lop° By 3-a Vcq . u)/ JB JR No) r &deka/du-1c- r- Avst Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 96-1152. Motion , second AYES: Benz, Oakes, Edgerton, NOES: None I Reviczky,%Mayor Bowler [ 04-7-)_i 0-0 r 74t- (slot-4LT 1097() &It °Lvvr" • City Council Minutes 03-12-96 'Page 9053 • • (b) ORDINANCE NO. 96-1153 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING OPEN SPACE OVERLAY (OS -O) ZONE TO—THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE PARKING SECTION TO INCLUDE RESTRICTIONS ON THE LOCATION OF OPEN PARKING ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AND IMPOSING THE PROPOSED 08-0 ZONE TO DESIGNATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AREAS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED, WHEN THEY ARE VACATED, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated cm March 4, 1996. (,in rRo eq UNArN►Met)b J Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 96-1153. Motion JR , second JO AYES: Benz, Oakes, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler NOES: None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1( ), ( ), ( ), and ( ) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None j i e, / 65� g ` og MUNICIPAL MATTERS 4. 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary. Roon ted __ Marc 4, 1996. �s1t 4 I� titO . • d,�g aVi.��w a Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to ,•uncil questions. -19-4 eµ i 404.0:e2 -1 -"Q"- "44- 670tatoescaelot,T Pu sem- Pu lic participation o ened at % : (O P.M. .- phr/r Pub is participation close at0�: P.M. /I .�/J3/�lS C 1/! 4/346-fx- ,9k0) ty ~ouncil Minutes 03-12-9 Page 9054 ,14, A f J� • • 0;44; 5' C11/1 P-12-6AL g/Ci -61 Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to approve the following events and authorize the Mayor to sign the appropriate contracts: i 1) WPVA - Women's Pro Volleyball Tournament: May 3-5, 1996; 2) Event Productions - Amateur Volleyball Tou nam nt July 20-21, 1996; I Pfa /! 3) CE Sport - 4 -Man & 4 -Woman Pro Volleyball Tournam n� fS August 16-18, 1996; 4) AVP - Hermosa Beach Volleyball Championships August 23-25, 1996; and, 5) Spike -It -Up Amateur Volleyball To nament —VIP September 7-8, 1996.P f "1.. Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. DOWNTOWN CIRCULATION AND PARKING STUDY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 4, 1996.C64e,L6(14/A_c-7 Community kr- Development Director Blumenfeld �-esent-ed-the t and responded to Council questions. cf;t-tiAcymitie-Aed(441°7•/ ed at : P.M. J //qq �ti s4444Lip • Public participation �aAT closed at : P.M. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive and file study; 2) Direct staff to proceed with processing the Downtown Implementation Plan and amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan; and, 3) Direct staff to extend hours of enforcement of Preferential Parking Program between 8th and 14th Streets on City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9055 • — 00yr 4442H 111, rer p4reoll ?)-v-E3-4,7.07 // .����,� fir, sn ay ?P" 76) ,2327"1-P F phi .1'2a r? -w7770 Ana • �,,„�,�raf/ Vy-01//,�,,�,� _ mss ---)5e2-70/14. '"I‘IP")44P • v- twki 4.641,,oL, Manhattan Avenue and meet with residents on proposed program changes. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Receive and file study; 2) Direct staff to proceed with processing the Downtown Implementation Plan and amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan; and, -Direct staff to extend hours of enforcement of Preferential Parking Program between 8th and 14th Streets on Manhattan Avenue and meet with residents on proposed program changes;T, Motion JR , second Sr--. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. t P. 01 . DOWNTOWN BANNER PROGRAM. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 6, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff port and responded to Council ���eesio A56- (91)70 ft- -(216-SD osr 41igaie If 232446-5 yell/ jo Public participation opened at 664wt (atted- 44- koi: Public participation closed at : P.M. • • P.M. 1/%1•614. todgee RECOMMENDATION: Adoptresolution approving the Downtown Banner Program and direct staff to proceed. A) Action: To approve the staff r 1) adopt Resolution No. 96-57j , entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CI COUN OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DOWNTOWN City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9056 • STREET BANNER PROGRAM PURSUANT TO SECTION 3-3.10 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE."; and, 2) direct staff to proceed with the banner program. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. • 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 8: MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None 9. OTHER MATTERS — CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to discuss setting up a system wherein the City would give back a percentage of business license fees based upon sales tax payout. b. Request from Councilmember Edgerton to implement conflict of interest ordinance by utilizing draft ordinance provided by City Attorney Michael Jenkins.• 4444444n tee. ate, s14- Ap. • Vdo CITIOMMENTS City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9057 • Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Councilt this timexre�: ea ir- -6 1/a.- ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Carrillo v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YCO20233, Superior Court - Torrance ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, March 12, 1996 at the hour of •P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, March 26, 1996 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9058 Where there is no vision the people perish HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOMEI By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or orally. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the - Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet compilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agenda is developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allotted. ElIn compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204. Please provide enough time to enable us to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. GLOSSARY Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law -or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues ' and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - °City Manager... The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. J "Goals are dreams with deadlines." AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, March 12, 1996 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK John Bowler Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Julie Oakes John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Robert Benz Stephen R. Burrell Sam Y. Edgerton CITY ATTORNEY J. R. Reviczky Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS NONE 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council.. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on February 27, 1996. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to adopt resolution supporting the continued utilization of the South Bav Private Industry Council for delivery of local Job Training Programs. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 29, 1996. (e) Recommendation to set workshop dates of Thursday, May 23, 1996 and Thursday, June 6, 1996 at 7:OOpm for review of the 1996-97 budget. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 29, 1996. (f) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 21, 1996. (g) Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City and the South Bay Free Clinic for the use of Room 11 in the Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign contract. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 29, 1996. (h) Recommendation to approve the priority list for park and recreation facility CIP's and the park master planning process. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 4, 1996. (i) Recommendation to award professional services contract to Gills and Associates Architects to prepare construction documents and specifications for City Council chamber remodel, City Hall remodel and ADA requirements in the amount of $42,790.00 and authorize Public Works Director to allow minor changes within the budgeted amount. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 4, 1996. 2 u) Recommendation to adopt resolution ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting Assessment District during FY 1996- 97. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 5, 1996. (k) Recommendation to approve request from South Bay Coalition for a one (1) month extension to lease Room 4 in the Community Center and authorize Mayor to sign amendment. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 5, 1996. Recommendation to approve easement agreement granting Los Angeles County Flood Control District rights of ingress and egress to their recently installed observation well located at 24th Street and the Greenbelt. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 5, 1996. (1) (m) Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes from the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission meeting of March 6, 1996. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. a. ORDINANCE NO. 96-1152 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE R-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 4-3(12) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO MAKE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE A PROPORTION OF LOT SIZE (10%) AND TO MODIFY THE EXCEPTION FOR LOTS OF 2500 SQUARE FEET OR LESS, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 4, 1996 and memorandum requesting clarification of previous Council action from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 5, 1996 b. ORDINANCE NO. 96-1153 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING OPEN SPACE OVERLAY (OS -O) ZONE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE PARKING SECTION TO INCLUDE RESTRICTIONS ON THE LOCATION OF OPEN PARKING ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AND IMPOSING THE PROPOSED OS -O ZONE TO DESIGNATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AREAS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED, WHEN THEY ARE VACATED, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 4, 1996. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. NONE 3 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 4. 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 4, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Approve 1996 Special Events and authorize Mayor to sign contracts. 5. DOWNTOWN CIRCULATION AND PARKING STUDY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 4, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive and file study; 2) Direct staff to proceed with processing the Downtown Implementation Plan and amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan; and, 3) Direct staffto extend hours of enforcement of Preferential Parking Program between 8th and 14th Streets on Manhattan Avenue and meet with residents on proposed program changes. 6. DOWNTOWN BANNER PROGRAM. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 6, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving the Downtown Banner Program and direct staff to proceed. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER NONE 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to discuss setting up a system wherein the City would give back a percentage of business license fees based upon sales tax payout. b. Request from Councilmember Edgerton to implement conflict of interest ordinance by utilizing draft ordinance provided by City Attorney Michael Jenkins. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. 4 ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on February 27, 1996. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Carrillo v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YCO20233, Superior Court - Torrance ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 5 A:\AGND96\0312reg.doc ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, March 12, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session CALL TO ORDER: 7:09pm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Jim Dewey, DEC Commissioner ROLL CALL: BOWLER, OAKES, REVICZKY, EDGERTON ABSENT: BENZ PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Jim Lissner: Announced that he and several other residents have filed an appeal of three Planning Commission decisions regarding alcohol establishments. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS NONE 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on February 27, 1996. PULLED BY JR JR/SE MOTION TO INCORPORATE SUBSTITUTE PAGE SUBMI11 ED BY CITY CLERK TO CORRECT AN EtOR, VOTE: 4-0 (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to adopt resolution supporting the continued utilization of the South Bay Private Industry Council for delivery of local Job Training Programs. Memorandum from' Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 29, 1996. (e) Recommendation to set workshop dates of Thursday, May 23, 1996 and Thursday, June 6, 1996 at 7:00pm for review of the 1996-97 budget. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 29, 1996. (f) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 21, 1996. PULLED BY SE SE/JO MOTION TO BRING..BACK THE PARKS &REC.'MASTER PLAN FOR THE PARKING AREA AT CLARK. FIELD THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED AT THE FEBRUARY 13,1996 MEETING. VOTE 4-0_ SE/JO MOTION TO RECEIVE ANI? FII: ACTION MINIUM VOTE 4,0 (g) Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City and the South Bay Free Clinic for the use of Room 11 in the Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign contract. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 29, 1996. (h) Recommendation to approve the priority list for park and recreation facility CIP's and the park master planning process. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 4, 1996. PULLED BY JO JO/JR.MOTION TO'APPROVE WITH THE FOLLOWING DIRECTION TO PARKS & REC. COMMISSIO T 1)NQ NEED Taw PLAN DRAWINGS; 2) CONSIDER APPROPRIATENESS OF CURT .ENT PARK USES .(T E SOCCER AT VALLEY PARK); AND, AyINCLVDE TREE •TRIM ING;;;ON GREENBELT. VOTE 4-0 (i) a) Recommendation to award professional services contract to Gills and Associates Architects to prepare construction documents and specifications for City Council chamber remodel, City Hall remodel and ADA requirements in the amount of $42,790.00 and authorize Public Works Director to allow minor changes within the budgeted amount. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 4, 1996. Recommendation to adopt resolution ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting Assessment District during FY 1996- 97. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 5, 1996. (k) Recommendation to approve request from South Bay Coalition for a one (1) month extension to lease Room 4 in the Community Center and authorize Mayor to sign amendment. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 5, 1996. 2 .1 (1) Recommendation to approve easement agreement granting Los Angeles County Flood Control District rights of ingress and egress to their recently installed observation well located at 24th Street and the Greenbelt. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 5, 1996. PULLED BY JR J2/JO MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 4-0 ... . (m) Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes from the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission meeting of March 6, 1996. PULLED BY JR SE/JRR MOTION FOR D.E.C. AND PARKS & REC. COMMISSION TO WORK JOINTLY ON CLASS, III AND CLASS IV EVENTS. VOTE:. 4-0. JR/JO MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MINUTES FROM THE DOWNTOWN:BUSINESS' AREA ENHAICEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION MEETING'>OF MARCH 6,1996 VOTE: 4�0 JRJJO MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON BALANCE OF CONSENT CALENDAR, VOTE. 4-0 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. a. ORDINANCE NO. 96-1152 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE R-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 4-3(12) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO MAKE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE A PROPORTION OF LOT SIZE (10%) AND TO MODIFY THE EXCEPTION FOR LOTS OF 2500 SQUARE FEET OR LESS, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. "311/SE::- ENDBACK`TO PLANNING +COMM SION W TII DIRECTION TO<FOCUS ONri'THE " 100 SQ. FT. (IR LESS" .OTS'' TH:A 10% ALLOWANCE FORADMINISTRATIVE • DECISION AND DI E+I T PLANIIIIN COMMISSION • TO .STUDY OTHER: CITIES POLICIES 4'ITH RESPECT' O 1Q%a OPENSP.AC•E•REQUIREMENT FOR 14 -IL OT . YOTE 4-0 b. ORDINANCE NO. 96-1153 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING OPEN SPACE OVERLAY (OS -O) ZONE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE PARKING SECTION TO INCLUDE RESTRICTIONS ON THE LOCATION OF OPEN PARKING ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AND IMPOSING THE PROPOSED OS -O ZONE TO DESIGNATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AREAS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED, WHEN THEY ARE VACATED, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 4, 1996. JRIJO :MOTION TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 964153. VOTE: 4-0 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. NONE MUNICIPAL MATTERS 4. 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 4, 1996. JR/SE MOTION TO APPROVE JOSE CUERVO VOLLEYBALL EVENT AND PROVIDE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CONCERT CONTINGENT UPON COUNCIL FINAL APPROVAL OF BAND SELECTION AND NOTIFICATION OF PARKING NEEDS AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT. '(ATE JRWJO MOTION TO APPROVE SPLIT UP'EVENT AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR SIGN CONTRACT. VOTE: 4-0 JR/JO MOTION TO APPROVE' THE BALANCE OF 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACTS. VOTE: 4-0 4 5. DOWNTOWN CIRCULATION AND PARKING STUDY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 4, 1996. JR/SE MOTION TO 1) RECEIVE AND AL STUDY, z) DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED "WITH PROCESSING TIIE DOWNTOWN IMPLEIV ENTATION PLAN AND AMENDMENT TO THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN; AND, 3) DIRECT STAFF TO EXTEND HOURS Or ENFORCEMENT OF PREFERENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM BETWEEN 8TH ANO 14TH ST ETSON MANHATTAN AVENUE• AND MEET WIT RESIDENTS ON PROPOSED PROGRAM CHANGES, EXTEND HO1 SOF ENFORCEMENT FOR ENTIRE PREFERENTIAL PARTING AREA ANDALSO CONSIDER YEAR.ROUND VS SEASONAL PROGRAM COTE:: :49i 6. DOWNTOWN BANNER PROGRAM. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 6, 1996. SEIJO MOTION TO ADOPT RESO.L'UTION'APFROVING THE DOWNTOWN BANNER PROGRAM AND DIRECT; STAFF` TO PROCEED,:NOTING COUNCIL 'S D:IIRECTION TO ELIMINATE THE "CROSSROADS" THEME AND TO PROVIDE THESAME -TYPE SIZE ON: SPONSORS P AREA AS>FO ;D O) THE BANNERS I EL SEGUT O ``COTE: 4 + ' : :.._ 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER NONE 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL a. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to discuss setting up a system wherein the City would give back a percentage of business license fees based upon sales tax payout. CONTINUE>TO NEXT MEETING. ........................................................................................... .............................................................................................. b. Request from Councilmember Edgerton to implement conflict of interest ordinance by utilizing draft ordinance provided by City Attorney Michael Jenkins. S;EIJO MOTION TO:; AGENDIZE FOR:APRIL 9,1996 MEETING. VOTE: 4-0 CITIZEN COMMENTS Jim Lissner: Concerned about hotel project. Asked council to direct current TOT auditor to inform City of any difficulties in collecting TOT in time-share situation& A ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on February 27, 1996. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Carrillo v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YCO20233, Superior Court - Torrance ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION: 10:45pm RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 6 /?/y , , .9 Q.s G�!l 4v)S Jd Jd e?. Qq1704-lf Or 03- 2-9 �}�� i8e�.aBs�) � MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, February 27, 1996, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Bill Dougherty, Arts Hermosa ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENT: Mayor Bowler announced that tonight's meeting would be adjourned in memory of Hank Doerfling, former Mayor and Councilmember, Improvement Commissioner and California Coastal Commissioner, who died February 23, 1996, after a year-long battle with lymphoma cancer. Mr. Doerfling was 59 years old and is survived by his wife, Elaine, Hermosa Beach City Clerk, and their five children, and will be missed by all who knew him. PRESENTATIONS: FOLLOW-UP REPORT FROM FirstNIGHT Bill Dougherty of Arts Hermosa spoke of the success of the second FirstNight in which over 300 artists had performed at 35 venues. Mr. Daugherty said that the event was attended by more than 10,000 people and had cost $125,000 to produce. He continued with a recap of the publicity for the event, submitted information and gave signs for street routing and tee-shirts to be presented to staff helpers. 1% MILK CAMPAIGN PRESENTATION AND TASTE TEST CONDUCTED BY THE BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT Carl Driesler and Charlotte Lesser of the Beach Cities Health District presented a milk taste test by asking the Council to try to determine which type of milk they were tasting between whole milk, two percent milk, one percent milk and skim milk. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS No came forward to address the Council at this time were: (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None At 7:42 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting with item 4. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (h), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but City Council Minutes 02-27-96 Page 9038 la are shown in order for clarity: (d) Benz and (g) Reviczky. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on February 13, 1996. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 13, 1996 as presented., (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 5534 THROUGH 5536 INCLUSIVE, NOS. 5603 THROUGH 5607 INCLUSIVE, NOS. 5779 THROUGH 5790 INCLUSIVE, AND NOS. 5816 THROUGH 5949 INCLUSIVE, NOTING VOIDED CHECKS NOS. 5797 THROUGH 5815 INCLUSIVE AND NOS. 5872 AND 5947,. AND TO APPROVE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NOS. 5498, 5718, 5791 AND 5150 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE JANUARY 1996 FINANCIAL REPORTS: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting due to a question regarding Fire Department overtime costs. City Manager Burrell responded that those costs were due to paramedic training which was now completed. Action: To receive and file the January, 1996 Financial Reports as presented. Motion Benz, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AS THE CITY'S AGENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING CERTAIN FEDERAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE ROBERT T. STAFFORD DISASTER ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1988. City Council Minutes 02-27-96 Page 9039 Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated February 14, 1996. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 96-5794, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AS THE CITY'S AGENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING CERTAIN FEDERAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE ROBERT T. STAFFORD DISASTER ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1988." (f) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE ALLOCATION AND PAYMENT OF COUNTY AID TO CITIES FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $60,779 FOR MAINTENANCE OF SELECTED STREETS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated February 14, 1996. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) adopt Resolution No. 96-5791, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING AN ALLOCATION AND PAYMENT OF COUNTY AID TO CITIES FUNDS FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF SELECT SYSTEM STREETS.", which requests the allocation and payment of County Aid to Cities fund in the amount of $60,779 for maintenance of selected streets; and, 2) revise the estimated revenue from the County Aid to Cities from $89,499. to $60,779; revise the appropriation of $28,720 in County Aid to Cities funding with sewer funds for CIP 141. RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE L.A. COUNTY PARKS, BEACH AND RECREATION ACT OF 1996. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 20, 1996. (g) This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 96-5792, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACH AND RECREATION ACT OF 1996.", which: 1) supports the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1996; and, 2) requests the inclusion of an allocation of $2.48 million for the Hermosa Beach Pier and Waterfront Project as a proposed specific project in the ballot measure. Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Bowler. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. City Council Minutes 02-27-96 Page 9040 (h) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF 2/20/96. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the Action Minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of February 20, 1996. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 96-1151 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA_, RELATING TO STREET BANNERS AND HANDBILL DISTRIBUTION AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated February 20, 1996.. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 96-1151. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. AYES: Benz, Oakes, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler NOES: None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(d) and (g) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 4. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A PARKING PLAN FOR A 360 SQUARE FOOT MEZZANINE ADDITION; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR A SEATING/FLOOR PLAN CHANGE, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF A SUSHI BAR, TO AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE ALCOHOL, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1200 HERMOSA AVENUE, CLUB SUSHI. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 21, 1996. Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Michael Jenkins also responded to Council questions and said that it was both legal and customary for one person to appeal a project. The public hearing opened at 7:50 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, said that six people had contributed financially to the appeal; said that the notice for the Planning City Council Minutes 02-27-96 Page 9041 Commission meeting was insufficient as the posted signs had been torn down; said there was a cumulative impact due to the increase in the number of bars downtown that should be considered in the E.I.R.; questioned the parking impact and if the City could enforce the seating limits; showed a chart of incidents of crime with a concentration in the downtown area and said this would increase due to greater liquor consumption; and, Sheila Miller - 77 17th Street, said there were stairs going up both sides of the room to the mezzanine but no outside fire escape exits from that level; spoke of the potential liability to the City if the plan is approved; said the same owners also owned "Shark's Cove" which has caused noise problems to residents, so prior conduct of the owners should be considered. The public hearing closed at 8:00 P.M. Action: To: 1) deny the appeal and sustain the Planning Commission approval of the Parking Plan and Conditional Use Permit Amendment; and, 2) adopt Resolution No. 96-5790, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A PARKING PLAN FOR A 360 SQUARE FOOT MEZZANINE ADDITION, AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AS AMENDED, TO ALLOW ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL, IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT, AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AT 1200 HERMOSA AVENUE, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT." Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS IN THE R-1 ZONE, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION: a. TO MAKE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS A PERCENTAGE OF LOT SIZE (10%) RATHER THAN 400 SOUARE FEET MINIMUM ON LOTS 2500 SOUARE FEET OR LESS. b. TO ALLOW ALL OPEN SPACE TO BE ON DECKS ON SMALL LOTS (2100 SQUARE FEET OR LESS). Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 21, 1996. Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 02-27-96 Page 9042 The public hearing opened at 8:20 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 8:20 P.M. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 96-1152 as amended to modify the exception for lots of 2,500 square feet or less. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Reviczky and Mayor Bowler. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 96-1152, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE R-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 4-3(12) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO MAKE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE A PROPORTION OF LOT SIZE (10%) AND TO MODIFY THE EXCEPTION FOR LOTS OF 2500 SOUARE FEET OR LESS, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Edgerton, second Oakes. AYES: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None 6. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING PARKING LOCATION ON ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND ADDING OPEN SPACE OVERLAY (08-0) TO ZONING ORDINANCE ZONING PORTIONS OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAYS ABUTTING STRAND FRONTING CORNER LOTS (WHEN VACATED) TO OPEN SPACE OVERLAY ZONE; AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 5, 1996. Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Michael Jenkins also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:50 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 8:50 P.M. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 96-1153 as amended on page one, Section 1, Section 1157 (F), to read, "Open parking spaces for residential uses in the Open Space Zone (OS -O) shall be located only..." and as amended on page two, Section 2, Sec. 9.53-2, Prohibited Uses: to delete flag Polc3 as a prohibited use. Motion Oakes, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 96-1153, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING OPEN SPACE OVERLAY (OS -O) ZONE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE PARKING SECTION TO City Council Minutes 02-27-96 Page 9043 INCLUDE RESTRICTIONS ON THE LOCATION OF OPEN PARKING ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AND IMPOSING THE PROPOSED 08-0 ZONE TO DESIGNATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AREAS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED, WHEN THEY ARE VACATED, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. AYES: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None Proposed Action: To have Councilmembers Oakes and Reviczky work on a settlement for the East side of Beach Drive. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion was withdrawn with the direction to staff to return with a report on the problems involved in reaching an agreement for the East side of Beach Drive for the Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996. Action: To place an urgency item on the end of the agenda that has arisen after the posting of the agenda regarding a Resolution of Intent for the use of the proposed two percent Utility User Tax that will be voted on by the electorate at the March 26, 1996, Special Election. Motion Mayor Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. The meeting recessed at 8:55 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:10 P.M. and returned the order of the agenda to item 1. MUNICIPAL MATTERS - None 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. SB1590 (O'CONNELL) IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECEMBER 14, 1995 FOR SUPREME COURT DECISION ON PROPOSITION 62. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 21, 1996. City Manager Stephen Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize a letter to Senator Dills and Assemblywoman Bowen urging their support of SB1590. Motion Mayor Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz.. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, EXPIRATION OF TERMS. Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission - Two terms which expired September 15, City Council Minutes 02-27-96 Page 9044 1995. Memorandum from City Clerk's office dated February 8, 1996. Supplemental application from Mike Hanlon received February 27, 1996. Action: To approve the staff alternative recommendation number 2, to direct the City Clerk to re -advertise for applicants to the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission on the Easy Reader for March 7 and 15, 1996, with a deadline of March 20, 1996, by 6:00 P.M. and schedule applicant interviews for 6:00 P.M., prior to the regular meeting of March 26, 1996, for appointment later in the meeting. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. ADDED ITEM - URGENCY RESOLUTION OF INTENT. Mayor Bowler read the Resolution. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 96-5793, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, STATING ITS INTENT TO USE THE PROCEEDS OF THE GENERAL UTILITY TAX INCREASE PROVIDED FOR BY PROPOSITION F FOR STREET REPAIRS/IMPROVEMENTS AND FOR PROVIDING SCHOOL CROSSING GUARDS." Motion Mayor Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. Councilmember Oakes left the meeting at 9:40 P.M. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: a. Request from Mayor Bowler for consideration of placing parking meters in the affected downtown zone of Manhattan Avenue and Monterey Blvd. between 8th and 14th streets and allow permit parking for residents. Mayor Bowler spoke to his request. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions and said that a parking study would be on the agenda of the Regular Meeting of March 12, 1996, that could offer some options that would address this issue. Action: Mayor Bowler directed that this item be continued until after the parking study is heard at the Regular Meeting of March 12, 1996. b. Request from Councilmember Benz for an evaluation of the Planning Commission to determine whether they are meeting the City Council's goals. City Council Minutes 02-27-96 Page 9045 Councilmember Benz said that this item had been placed on the agenda in error and that he wished it to be withdrawn at this time. c. Request from Councilmember Benz for City Council to meet with the Planning Commission per their request. Letter from Councilmember Benz dated February 22, 1996. Councilmember Benz spoke to his request. Action: To schedule a joint meeting with the Planning Commission for April 30, 1996 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the absence of Oakes. CITIZEN COMMENTS No one came forward to address the Council at this time. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR: pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 - City Manager Stephen Burrell, negotiating for the City with Teamsters Union, Local 911 ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned in memory of Hank Doerfling on Tuesday, February 27, 1996 at the hour of 9:50 P.M. to the closed session. The closed session convened at the hour of 10:04 P.M. At the hour of 10:35 P.M. the closed session reconvened to the Regular Meeting. ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS: The City Council provided direction to city Negotiator Stephen Burrell regarding labor negotiations with Teamster Union, Local 911. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, February 27, 1996 at the hour of 10:36 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, March 12, 1996 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. �Qp Depu y City Clerk City Council Minutes 02-27-96 Page 9046 March 12, 1996 Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council March 12, 1996 REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF A CORRECTED PAGE 9040 TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 1996 Recommendation: To accept the substitute page 9040, attached, which corrects the action shown in item 1(e) for the Regular Meeting of February 27, 1996. Respectfully submitted, Naoma Valdes Deputy City Clerk -1- SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM 1(a) VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 ---> VOID CHECKS CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 006170 VOID 71i):2-11. 1 't/)/ 1 (.6449 03-12-gt PAGE 1 lb VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6103 03/06/96 002744 A & E TROPHIES 6104 03/06/96 006609 AAMCO TRANSMISSION 6105 03/06/96 007007 BRYAN ADAMS 6106 03/06/96 000003 ADVANCE ELEVATOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ENGRAVING/FEB 96 OVERHAUL TRANSMISSION/P.D. ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES ELEVATOR MAINT/FEB 96 6107 03/06/96 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINTENANCE/FEB 96 RADIO MAINTENANCE/FEB 96 RADIO MAINTENANCE/FEB 96 6108 03/06/96 006290 AIR GAS INDUSTRIES 6109 03/06/96 003209 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR OXYGEN REFILLS/JAN 96 CELLULAR PHONE CHGS/JAN 96 CELLULAR PHONE CHGS/FEB 96 CELLULAR PHONE CHGS/JAN 96 CELLULAR PHONE CHGS/FEB 96 6110 03/06/96 006997 ALEXANDER BAG COMPANY SAND BAGS/PUB WORKS 6111 03/06/96 006973 ELAINE ALEY ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ANIMAL TRAP USE FEE 6112 03/06/96 005221 ALL POINTS MAINTENANCE PIER MAINT/JAN 96 6113 03/06/96 006995 JACK ANDERSON 6114 03/06/96 001895 HAROLD ANSCHEL DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 6115 03/06/96 000152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE UTILITY RAGS/JAN 96 UTILITY RUGS/JAN 96 UTILITY RAGS/RUGS-JAN 96 UTILITY RAGS & RUGS/JAN 96 UTILITY RAGS/JAN 96 6116 03/06/96 006423 ASSOCIATED TRUCK & BRAK OVERHAUL HYDROLIC PUMP/PUB WOR 6117 03/06/96 005179 AT&T LONG DIST CHGS/DEC,JAN,FEB 6118 03/06/96 000857 ATLAS FOODS INTERNATION PRISONER MEALS/JAN 96 PRISONER MEALS/FEB 96 6119 03/06/96 006996 THE AUTOMOTIVE INDEX PUBLICATIONS/POLICE 6120 03/06/96 000407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERV/JAN 96 LOCKSMITH SERV/JAN 96 LOCKSMITH SERV/JAN 96 LOCKSMITH SERV/JAN 96 LOCKSMITH SERV/JAN 96 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1101-4319 001-2101-4311 001-2110 001-3895 001-4204-4201 110-3302-4307 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-3104-4309 001-2110 001-3895 001-3104-4201 001-2110 001-2110 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-3104-4311 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4305 105-2601-4309 001-2101-4309 001-2101-4311 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4305 ITEM AMOUNT 19.40 908.50 50.00 6.70- 100.00 239.50 2,387.50 205.00 117.00 44.19 101.96 129.73 35.76 1,082.50 50.00 6.70- 680.00 250.00 1,600.00 14.24 89.32 50.45 71.02 28.40 351.81 726.56 136.87 56.79 15.25 1.35 107.70 46.50 49.50 5.41 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 19.40 908.50 43.30 100.00 2,832.00 117.00 311.64 1,082.50 43.30 680.00 250.00 1,600.00 253.43 351.81 726.56 193.66 15.25 210.46 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6121 03/06/96 000252 BEACH TRAVEL 6122 03/06/96 006965 GEORGE BECKERSON 6123 03/06/96 003136 ROBERT BENZ 6124 03/06/96 006329 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR 6125 03/06/96 006966 BLACKSTAR OIL COMPANY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION AIRFARE ADV/R.BENZ ASSESSMENT REBATE PER DIEM ADVANCE PLAN CHECK SERV/DEC 95 PLAN CHECK SERV/JAN 96 WASTE OIL REMOVAL/PUB WORKS 6126 03/06/96 006409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS ASPHALT PURCHASES/JAN 96 6127 03/06/96 006980 MILDRED BRADVICA-LYON 6128 03/06/96 000163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 6129 03/06/96 006967 BUDGET BOARD UPS 6130 03/06/96 000034 BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPOR 6131 03/06/96 007009 C T & F, INC. 6132 03/06/96 006968 C.D.O.A. DARE CONF 1996 6133 03/06/96 005631 CALIFORNIA CHARTER/K-T ASSESSMENT REBATE PRISONER LAUNDRY/JAN 96 BOARD -UP VACANT HOUSE/P.D. CITY ENVELOPES/STOCK PARKING PERMIT FORMS WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND CONF REG/THOMPSON & HEARD BUS/COMM RES TRIP JAN 1 BUS/COMM RES TRIP JAN 21 BUS/COMM RES TRIP JAN 26 6134 03/06/96 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT SWEEPING SERV/ JAN 96 6135 03/06/96 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC NEW METER/GOULD & VALLEY/JAN WATER BILL CHGS/DEC & JAN WATER BILL CHGS/DEC & JAN WATER BILL CHGS/DEC & JAN 6136 03/06/96 000014 CHAMPION CHEVROLET 6137 03/06/96 000634 CHEVRON USA, INC. 6138 03/06/96 000153 CINTAS CORPORATION 6139 03/06/96 004715 COLEN AND LEE DEALER AUTO PARTS/JAN 96 DEALER AUTO PARTS/JAN 96 DEALER AUTO PARTS/JAN 96 DEALER AUTO PARTS/JAN 96 GASOLINE PURCH/JAN 96 UNIFORM RENTAL/JAN 96 UNIFORM RENTAL/JAN 96 LIABILITY ADMIN/FEB 96 6140 03/06/96 006175 COLOR TILE TILES/COMMUNITY CENTER ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1101-4317 105-3105 001-1101-4317 001-4201-4201 001-4201-4201 001-4204-4201 001-3104-4309 105-3105 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4309 001-1208-4305 110-1204-4305 001-2110 001-2101-4317 145-3409-4201 145-3409-4201 145-3409-4201 001-3104-4201 001-4202-4303 105-2601-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4202-4303 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4310 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 705-1209-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 122.00 37.98 150.00 902.46 451.11 50.00 59.04 18.99 265.35 125.00 1,079.89 973.08 1,600.00 300.00 2,010.00 703.50 282.55 9,300.00 15.39 2,041.02 4,696.58 788.76 30.27 30.31 317.28 17.89 24.95 492.64 27.60 1,470.00 001-4204-4309 35.61 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 122.00 37.98 150.00 1,353.57 50.00 59.04 18.99 265.35 125.00 2,052.97 1,600.00 300.00 2,996.05 9,300.00 7,541.75 395.75 24.95 520.24 1,470.00 35.61 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 6141 03/06/96 006563 CONSTRUCTION MGMT INSPE INSP SERVICES/HERM AVE REHAB 6142 03/06/96 006835 CORAL DEVELOPMENT CORP FORFEIT FEE REFUND 6143 03/06/96 000850 L. N. CURTIS HELMETS/FIRE DEPT REPLACE STOLEN HELMET REPLACE STOLEN HELMET 6144 03/06/96 000047 DANIEL FREEMAN MEMORIAL EMP ANNUAL PHYSICAL 6145 03/06/96 001390 DAPPER TIRE CO. 6146 03/06/96 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. 6147 03/06/96 006100 DATAVAULT TIRE PURCHASES/JAN 96 TIRE PURCHASES/JAN 96 TIRE PURCHASES/JAN 96 TIRE PURCHASES/JAN 196 DMV RECORDS RETRIEVAL/FEB 96 DMV RECORDS RETRIEVAL/JAN 96 DMV RECORDS RETRIEVAL JAN/96 DMV RECORDS RETRIEVAL/JAN 96 OFF-SITE STORAGE/JAN 96 6148 03/06/96 000154 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA SHELTER COSTS/SEP 95 SHELTER COSTS/DEC 95 SHELTER COSTS/JAN 96 6149 03/06/96 000267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT HIGHWAY MAINT/OCT 95 HIGHWAY MAINT/DEC 95 6150 03/06/96 000147 THE DEVELOPMENT 6151 03/06/96 006969 MARY ANN DIB FILM DEVELOPING/JAN 96 FILM DEVELOPING/JAN 96 FILM DEVELOPING/JAN 96 FILM DEVELOPING/JAN 96 DEPOSITED TO BUS. LIC. ACCT 6152 03/06/96 006970 JOSEPH OR DEBRA DICOCHE CITE PAYMENT REFUND 6153 03/06/96 000269 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPO COMPUTER SYS MAINT/JAN 96 COMPUTER SYS MAINT/JAN 96 DISPATCH SYS MAINT/FEB 96 DISPATCH SYS MAINT/FEB 96 6154 03/06/96 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL FILM PURCHASES/JAN 96 FILM PURCHASES/JAN 96 FILM PURCHASES/JAN 96 FILM PUCHASES/JAN 96 6155 03/06/96 006971 THOMAS DUNCLIFFE ASSESSMENT REBATE 6156 03/06/96 006972. DOUGLAS DUVAL REFUND TOWING FEES ACCOUNT NUMBER 160-8408-4201 001-2110 001-2201-4187 001-2201-4187 001-2201-4187 001-1203-4320 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4311 110-1204-4201 110-3302-4201 110-3302-4201 110-3302-4201 001-1206-4201 110-3302-4251 110-3302-4251 110-3302-4251 105-2601-4251 105-2601-4251 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4306 105-2601-4309 001-4601-4305 001-3115 110-3302 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4305 001-4101-4305 001-4201-4305 001-2101-4306 105-3105 001-3841 ITEM AMOUNT 10,295.00 50.00 264.38 216.07 136.40 400.00 160.62 160.62 160.62 160.62 42.63 876.12 34.65 31.99 111.05 494.18 20.54 219.78 2,037.37 1,197.61 23.51 58.02 38.16 18.73 200.00 20.00 171.47 114.31 171.47 114.31 126.88 136.40 136.40 112.58 37.98 38.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 10,295.00 50.00 616.85 400.00 642.48 985.39 111.05 734.50 3,234.98 138.42 200.00 20.00 571.56 512.26 37.98 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6157 03/06/96 001498 DYNAMED 6158 03/06/96 002840 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 6159 03/06/96 000181 EASY READER 6160 03/06/96 001400 EFRAM MOBIL 6161 03/06/96 001397 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 6162 03/06/96 006998 6163 03/06/96 000830 6164 03/06/96 001294 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT EQUITABLE LIFE OF IOWA EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE 6165 03/06/96 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 6166 03/06/96 006975 CHRISTOPHER FLEMING 6167 03/06/96 000010 FRANKSONS, INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND TOWING FEES PARAMEDIC SUPP/JAN 96 PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES/JAN 96 COPIER MAINT/JAN 96 COPIER USE/DEC 95 COPIER MAINT/DEC 95 COPIER USAGE/NOV 95 PUBLIC NOTICES/JAN 96 MOTORCYCLE GASOLINE/JAN 96 UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS/OCT-DEC 95 PENALTY/UNEMP CLAIMS/JUL-SEP ANNUAL PREM/E. DILLER JANITORIAL SERV/JAN 96 JANITORIAL SERV/12-16-95 DELIVERY SERVICE/JAN 96 CITE PYMT REFUND GO - 4 PARTS 6168 03/06/96 006976 GRAPHIC ART PRODUCTION THERMAL CITATION ROLLS 6169 03/06/96 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO FAX CHGS/DEC 95 & JAN 96 FAX CHGS/DEC 95 & JAN 96 FAX CHCS/DEC 95 & JAN 96 FAX CHGS/DEC 95 & JAN 96 FAX CHGS/DEC 95 & JAN 96 FAX CHGS/ DEC 95 & JAN 96 FAX CHGS/DEC 95 & JAN 96 FAX CHGS/DEC 95 & JAN 96 FAX CHGS/DEC 95 & JAN 96 FAX CHGS/DEC 95 & JAN 96 FAX CHGS/DEC 95 & JAN 96 TELEPHON CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-3302-4201 001-2201-4309 001-2201-4309 001-1208-4201. 001-1208-4201 001-1208-4201 001-1208-4201 001-1121-4323 001-2101-4310 705-1215-4186 705-1215-4186 001-1203-4188 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-1203-4201 110-3302 110-3302-4311 110-3302-4305 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-4202-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1206-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 ITEM AMOUNT 69.50 60.62 35.18 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 107.50 95.80 345.00 156.73 345.00 217.69 1,064.42 487.69 487.69 79.29 79.29 10,365.00 10,365.00 1,334.12 1,334.12 4,159.00 4,159.00 5,380.00 185.00 5,565.00 15.00 15.00 120.00 120.00 324.39 324.39 1,935.51 1,935.51 8.48 3.29 26.74 1.68 18.36 5.64 2.28 4.13 .49 4.13 10.68 19.59 41.64 2,613.97 388.36 146.97 303.54 124.92 126.01 461.41 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6171 03/06/96 001340 GTEL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHCS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 EQUIP RENT/JAN 96 6172 03/06/96 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. TEMP BLDG INSP/DEC 95 TEMP BLDG INSP/JAN 96 TEMP BLDG 1NSP/JAN 96 6173 03/06/96 006977 MARJORIE HEDRICK CITE PAYMENT REFUND 6174 03/06/96 002066 HERMOSA BCH CITY SCHOOL FIELD USE & MAINT/JAN-MAR 96 6175 03/06/96 004075 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WORK COMP CLAIMS TO 2/5/96 WORK COMP CLAIMS/TO 2/12/96 6176 03/06/96 003131 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & SALES TAX SERV/JAN-MAR 96 6177 03/06/96 003432 HOME DEPOT 6178 03/06/96 006000 KENNETH HUMPHREY 6179 03/06/96 005356 JOHN HUNTER & ASSOC. 6180 03/06/96 003783 JAMES V. HURLEY, 6181 03/06/96 006305 JESSE IBATUAN BUILDING SUPP/JAN 96 BUILDING SUPP/JAN 96 FORFEIT FEE REFUND FORFEIT ONE GAME NPDES PROG SERV/SEP 95 -JAN 96 FORFEIT FEE REFUND THEATRE TECH/2-1 & 2-3-96 LIGHT TECH/2-10-96 6182 03/06/96 002591 INDEPENDENT ORD. OF ODD DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND ADDL HOUSE MGR STAFF TIME ADDL LIGHT TECH TIME ADDL SOUND TECH TIME 6183 03/06/96 005254 INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP DISPATCH SYS MAINT/JAN-FEB 96 DISPATCH SYS MAINT/JAN-FEB 96 MAC PC MAINTENANCE/JAN-FEB 96 ' 6184 03/06/96 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/JAN 96 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/JAN 96 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/JAN 96 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4601-4304 001-4204-4321 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4201-4201 001-4201-4201 001-4201-4201 110-3302 001-4202-4251 705-1217-4324 705-1217-4324 001-1202-4201 105-2601-4309 001-4204-4309 001-2110 001-3893 160-3102-4201 001-2110 001-4601-4201 001-4601-4201 001-2110 001-3406 001-3406 001-3406 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4201 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 231.05 97.90 22.05 19.59 41.64 41.64 124.92 63.68 451.27 1,008.78 51.56 990.00 1,386.00 1,650.00 20.00 1,500.00 2,304.13 13,345.25 905.67 119.75 317.28 50.00 25.00- 6,240.00 50.00 75.00 90.00 500.00 7.00- 15.00- 20.00- 915.60 610.40 402.00 178.61 178.61 229.15 PAGE 6 . CHECK AMOUNT 6,414.83 51.56 4,026.00 20.00 1,500.00 15,649.38 905.67 437.03 25.00 6,240.00 50.00 165.00 458.00 1,928.00 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN 6185 03/06/96 006140 INSTASHRED SECURITY SER SHREDDING SERVICES/JAN 96 6186 03/06/96 007006 INTERNATIONAL AMBASSADO DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 6187 03/06/96 002551 INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL LIEUTENANT EXAM FORMS 6188 03/06/96 004908 JAMESTOWN PRESS 6189 03/06/96 007014 RICHARD JOHN FORFEIT FEE REFUND FORFEIT FEE REFUND FORFEIT ONE GAME 6190 03/06/96 006803 KORVE ENGINEERING, INC PROG PMT 2/DWNTWN CIRC STUDY 6191 03/06/96 000151 L.A. CO SHERIFF'S DEPAR PRISONER BOOKING FEES/NOV 95 6192 03/06/96 000843 L.A. COUNTY METROPOLITA BAL DUE/DEC 95 BUS PASS SALES BUS PASS SALES/JAN 96 6193 03/06/96 006259 L.A. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIS BILINGUAL TESTING/D. CORTEZ 6194 03/06/96 006978 LA OPINION 6195 03/06/96 004303 LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 6196 03/06/96 007002 FLORENCE LANGFORD 6197 03/06/96 006979 LASER CARE PUBLIC NOTICE/PUB WORKS PARKS MAINT/JAN 96 .ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES FAX TONER CARTRIDGE/POLICE 6198 03/06/96 000842 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CI ANNUAL DUES/95-96 6199 03/06/96 000167 LEARNED LUMBER 6200 03/06/96 002175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIE 6201 03/06/96 005072 LINE MASTER 6202 03/06/96 007012 GIUSEPPA LOMBARDO 6203 03/06/96 000077 LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVIC BUILDING SUPP/JAN 96 BUILDING SUPPLIES/JAN 96 SAFETY GOGGLES/MASK BUILDING SUPPLIES/JAN 96 BUILDING SUPPLIES/JAN 96 BUILDING SUPPLIES/JAN 96 LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 96 PAINT SPRAYER PARTS/PAINT TRCK WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES/JAN-FEB 96 BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES/JAN-FEB 96 BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES/JAN-FEB 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2021 001-2022 001-2101-4201 001-2110 001-1203-4201 001-2110 001-2110 001-3893 109-8160-4201 001-2101-4251 145-3403-4251 145-3403-4251 001-1203-4201 160-3102-4201 001-4202-4201 001-2110 001-3895 001-2101-4305 001-1101-4315 001-2201-4309 105-2601-4309 001-2101-4306 001-3104-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 001-1203-4201 001-3104-4309 001-2110 160-8408-4201 001-4202-4201 160-3102-4201 001-2021 PAGE 7 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 4.67 4.67- 586.37 56.00 56.00 500.00 500.00 120.50 120.50 50.00 50.00 50.00 25.00- 25.00 24,137.50 24,137.50 145.84 145.84 18.00 452.00 470.00 29.00 29.00 190.80 190.80 7,910.00 7,910.00 50.00 6.70- 43.30 59.07 59.07 2,833.00 2,833.00 27.82 5.50 21.07 13.43 33.15 16.55 728.15 316.46 1,600.00 98.86 69.54 23.35 3.91 117.52 728.15 316.46 1,600.00 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DISCOUNTS TAKEN 6204 03/06/96 000079 LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. INITIAL UNIFORM/PAPANDREA RAINSUITS/PHILLIPS & WHIPKEY DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND FORFEIT FEE REFUND PARKS SIGNS/PUBLIC WORKS DEALER AUTO PARTS/JAN 96 DEALER AUTO PARTS/JAN 96 FORFEIT FEE REFUND FORFEIT ONE GAME WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND FORFEIT FEE REFUND LEGAL SERVICES/FEB 96 6205 03/06/96 007005 DEBRA LUCAS 6206 03/06/96 007013 MIKE MANCE 6207 03/06/96 001255 MANERI SIGN CO., INC. 6208 03/06/96 000605 MANHATTAN FORD 6209 03/06/96 006716 JEFF MAYFIELD 6210 03/06/96 005930 CATHY MC CURDY 6211 03/06/96 004149 HUGH JOHN MCDONALD 6212 03/06/96 004138 KENNETH A. MEERSAND 6213 03/06/96 006999 MILDRED LYON, CATHERINE ASSESSMENT REBATE 6214 03/06/96 007011 STEVE MORA DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 6215 03/06/96 005563 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION R SAFETY FENCE RENTAL/FEB 96 6216 03/06/96 006224 LISA NEWSOM 6217 03/06/96 006982 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS 6218 03/06/96 002514 OFFICE DEPOT 6219 03/06/96 004142 OFFICE DEPOT REIMB TRAVEL/CPRS CONFERENCE MOTOR FOR TRAFFIC STRIPER OFFICE SUPPLIES/STOCK OFFICE SUPPLIES/STOCK OFFICE SUPPLIES/STOCK OFFICE SUPPLIES/STOCK OFFICE SUPPLIES/STOCK OFFICE SUPPLIES/STOCK OFFICE SUPPLIES/STOCK 6220 03/06/96 006667 OHODO L & C ENGINEERING SOIL TESTS/HERMOS AVE REHAB 6221 03/06/96 000321 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 6222 03/06/96 002487 PAGENET COMPUTER HOOKUPS/JAN-FEB 96 COMPUTER HOOKUPS/FEB 96 COMPUTER HOOKUPS/JAN-FEB 96 PAGING SERVICE/FEB 96 PAGING SERVICE/FEB 96 PAGING SERVICE/FEB 96 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2022 110-3302-4187 001-2101-4187 001-2110 001-2110 001-4202-4309 001-4201-4311 001-2101-4311 001-2110 001-3893 001-2110 001-2110 001-1132-4201 105-3105 001-2110 001-4201-4201 001-4601-4317 001-3104-4311 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-2101-4305 001-4201-4305 160-8408-4201 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4201 001-1201-4201 001-1203-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 3.91- 553.34 120.00 50.00 50.00 626.77 123.43 174.28 50.00 25.00- 1,600.00 50.00 5,600.00 18.99 50.00 41.65 177.77 185.81 103.90 86.78 6.42 115.55 27.57- 61.96 14.34 2,795.00 122.05 3.64 251.64 195.50 11.50 11.50 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 191.75 673.34 50.00 50.00 626.77 297.71 25.00 1,600.00 50.00 5,600.00 18.99 50.00 41.65 177.77 185.81 312.65 48.73 2,795.00 377.33 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6223 03/06/96 007000 MICHAEL PAUL 6224 03/06/96 000608 PEP BOYS 6225 03/06/96 006983 JANE PORTER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGING SERVICE/FEB 96 PAGING SERVICE/FEB 96 PAGING SERVICE/FEB 96 PAGING SERVICE/FEB 96 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES MOTORCYCLE BATTERY/POLICE ASSESSMENT REBATE 6226 03/06/96 003910 PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRA WHEEL ALIGNMENTS/JAN 96 6227 03/06/96 000296 THE PRINT NETWORK 6228 03/06/96 003302 JOHN PROUT SIGNS/COMM RES ACTIVITY FLYERS/COMM RES ACTIVITY FORFEIT FEE REFUND FORFEIT ONE GAME 6229 03/06/96 004301 R. & T. SPECIALTY, INC. D.A.R.E. PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6230 03/06/96 006867 RAINBOW ENVIRONMENTAL P NPDES PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6231 03/06/96 006102 HEC RAMSEY ENTERPRISES PARKING NOTICE POSTCARDS 6232 03/06/96 004222 GARRICK RAWLINGS 6233 03/06/96 006607 RENU INT'L CORP FORFEIT FEE REFUND MOTOROLA RADIO BATTERIES 6234 03/06/96 005379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS LEGAL SERVICES/DEC 95 LEGAL SERVICES/DEC 95 LEGAL SERVICES/DEC 95 LEGAL SERVICES/DEC 95 LEGAL SERVICES/DEC 95 LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 96 LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 96 LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 96 LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 96 LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 96 LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 96 LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 96 6235 03/06/96 004061 SYLVIA ROOT 6236 03/06/96 006120 ROTH & ASSOCIATES 6237 03/06/96 007010 LORRAINE RYAN ADDL SERVICES/NOV 21-95 MINUTES SEC/1-16-96 BODY GLOVE LOT APPRAISAL CASH DEPOSIT AGREEMENT REFUND 6238 03/06/96 007008 S.P.E.B.S.G.S.A., INC. DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-3302-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 001-1206-4201 001-2110 001-3895 001-2101-4311 105-3105 001-2101-4311 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4302 001-2110 001-3893 001-2101-4305 160-8302-4309 110-1204-4305 001-2110 001-2101-4307 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 126-8514-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1203-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-4102-4201 001-4102-4201 125-8515-4201 001-2110 001-2110 ITEM AMOUNT 11.50 34.50 126.50 11.50 50.00 6.70- 54.11 37.98 227.58 11.37 51.42 50.00 25.00- 30.00 147.00 613.21 50.00 750.00 4,218.30 329.09 19.99 1,148.95 1,228.30 16,108.49 1,272.60 75.76 879.35 92.25 192.50 537.75 34.38 215.88 250.00 1,500.00 500.00 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 402.50 43.30 54.11 37.98 227.58 62.79 25.00 30.00 147.00 613.21 50.00 750.00 26,103.33 250.26 250.00 1,500.00 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ADDL LIGHT TECH TIME ADDL SOUND TECH TIME 6239 03/06/96 003428 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATIO RECYCLE SOLVENT/CITY GARAGE 6240 03/06/96 007001 SANGRIA WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 6241 03/06/96 000839 SUSAN SAXE-CLIFFORD PH PSYCH EVAL/RESERVE OFFICER 6242 03/06/96 006986 MATT SCHUMACHER CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 6243 03/06/96 006987 SEPULVEDA CONSTRUCTION WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 6244 03/06/96 006672 DEBORAH SHAFFER 6245 03/06/96 007015 SHARK'S COVE 6246 03/06/96 003505 SHORELINE PRINTING DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND ADDITIONAL STAFF HOURS FORFEIT FEE REFUND BUS CARDS/FINANCE PERSONNEL PKG DAILY LOG SHEETS PARKING LABELS POLICE EXCEPTION SLIPS BUSINESS CARDS/D. MENART POLICE FORMS LETTERHEAD & ENV/DUI TSK FORCE EVENT/PARTY PKG PERMIT FORMS BUS CARDS/PKS-REC COMMISSION 6247 03/06/96 006666 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC PROG PMT/HERM AVE SEWER PROJ 6248 03/06/96 006804 SJI CONSULTANTS, INC CAPITAL FACILITIES STUDY 6249 03/06/96 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP PRISONER SUPPLIES/JAN 96 CLEANING SUPPLIES/JAN 96 6250 03/06/96 006211 R.A. SMITH JR. OILWELL MAINT/FEBRUARY 96 6251 03/06/96 000113 SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUI FIRE EXT REFILL/JAN 96 6252 03/06/96 000018 SOUTH BAY WELDERS TANK RENTAL/DEC 95 TANK RENTAL/DEC 95 TANK REFILLS/JAN 96 6253 03/06/96 000159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI ELECTRIC BILLINGS/JAN 96 ELECTRIC BILLINGS/JAN 96 ELECTRIC BILLINGS/JAN 96 ELECTRIC BILLINGS/JAN 96 ELECTRIC BILLINGS/JAN 96 ELECTRIC BILLINGS/JAN 96 ELEC BILLINGS/JAN-FEB 96 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-3406 001-3406 001-4204-4201 001-2110 001-1203-4320 110-3302 001-2110 001-3115 001-2110 001-3406 001-2110 001-1202-4305 110-3302-4305 110-3302-4305 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4305 110-1204-4305 001-4601-4305 160-8408-4201 001-4202-4201 001-2101-4306 001-4204-4309 001-8608-4201 001-2101-4309 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4303 001-4202-4303 105-2601-4303 160-3102-4303 105-2601-4303 001-3104-4303 105-2601-4303 ITEM AMOUNT 8.00- 8.00- 227.84 1,600.00 275.00 30.00 1,600.00 127.00 500.00 52.00- 50.00 113.66 221.91 811.88 292.27 37.89 898.47 108.25 162.38 75.78 174,857.24 9,950.00 97.55 110.74 150.00 16.25 31.00 19.00 73.93 8,856.13 2,208.75 244.16 110.98 207.98 809.38 47.43 PAGE 10 CHECK AMOUNT 484.00 227.84 1,600.00 275.00 30.00 1,727.00 448.00 50.00 2,722.49 174,857.24 9,950.00 208.29 150.00 16.25 123.93 12,484.81 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 6254 03/06/96 000442 6255 03/06/96 000170 6256 03/06/96 000146 6257 03/06/96 000115 6258 03/06/96 006988 6259 03/06/96 000364 6260 03/06/96 006989 6261 03/06/96 003749 6262 03/06/96 000776 6263 03/06/96 006990 6264 03/06/96 006991 6265 03/06/96 006992 6266 03/06/96 006993 6267 03/06/96 000404 6268 03/06/96 007004 6269 03/06/96 002976 6270 03/06/96 000717 6271 03/06/96 006586 6272 03/06/96 004768 6273 03/06/96 003598 6274 03/06/96 006453 6275 03/06/96 000311 6276 03/06/96 000141 6277 03/06/96 003457 VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI STREET LITE BILLS/FEB 96 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS BILLINGS/FEB 96 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WAT DRINKING WATER SERV/JAN 96 SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE C DOWNTOWN AREA MAINT/JAN 96 GEORGIA SPENCER STATE OF CALIFORNIA SYNTHESIS MARKETING & TAKATA NURSERY TAYLOR TENNIS COURTS THIRD ALARM FIRE EQUIP JEAN THOMPSON RALPH TOLLIVER TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDIC TRAVER'S TREE SERVICE TRIGGER THE DIGGER TRW-REDI PROPERTY DATA J.G. TUCKER UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANC UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE VICTEL-SOUTH BAY WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECT ASSESSMENT REBATE FINGERPRINT APPS/JAN 96 FINGERPRINT APPS/JAN 96 DWNTWN BANNER PROGRAM SERVICES MEDIAN PLANTS/JAN 96 ROLLER HOCKEY RINK/SO PARK BOOTS/HAHN & GARAFANO ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE INVOICE PAYMENT REFUND/RODGERS CITY-WIDE TREE TRIMMING SERV WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND REPLACE CHECK LOST IN MAIL HI -LIFT TRUCK PARTS M. ROONEY TUITION/NOV 95-JAN96 COMPUTER EQUIP MAINT/FEB 96 FAX MACHINE/POLICE RECORDS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/PUB WORKS WELDON WILLIAMS & LICK PARKING STICKERS/95-96 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CODE UPDATES/DEC 95 WHITLOW EMERGENCY MED G 6278 03/06/96 005758 WILSON & ASSOCIATES PRISONER EMERGENCY SERVICES PRISONER EMERGENCY SERVICES BACKGROUND CHECK/DISPATCHER ACCOUNT NUMBER 105-2601-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4601-4305 109-3301-4201 105-3105 001-2101-4251 001-2101-4251 109-3301-4302 105-2601-4309 125-8515-4201 001-2201-4187 105-3105 105-3105 001-3840 001-4202-4201 001-2110 001-4201-4201 105-2601-4309 001-4601-4317 001-1206-4201 001-2101-5402 105-2601-4309 110-1204-4305 001-1141-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 PAGE 11 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 9,665.09 9,665.09 810.54 810.54 30.96 30.96 4,190.00 4,190.00 37.98 37.98 128.00 42.00 170.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 216.50 216.50 650.00 650.00 307.93 307.93 37.98 37.98 37.98 37.98 230.00 230.00 3,845.00 3,845.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 364.91 364.91 158.16 158.16 1,288.98 1,288.98 211.00 211.00 2,484.34 2,484.34 1,110.24 1,110.24 3,847.51 3,847.51 536.36 536.36 404.00 402.00 806.00 150.00 150.00 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 12 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 6279 03/06/96 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-4601-4305 12.94 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-4101-4317 13.00 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-1101-4305 5.62 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-2201-4305 7.14 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-4601-4317 12.00 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-1202-4317 3.00 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-4202-4309 20.00 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-2201-4305 35.73 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 160-3102-4309 40.00 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-4201-4305 29.76 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 109-3301-4305 15.13 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-1208-4305 26.94 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 705-1217-4324 19.80 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-2201-4311 6.11 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 110-3302-4311 8.00 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-2201-4305 59.38 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-4601-4305 9.89 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-2101-4305 86.49 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-2201-4309 7.57 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-2201-4305 11.05 PETTY CASH/FEB 1-27, 1996 001-2201-4311 3.88 6280 03/06/96 000135 XEROX CORPORATION 6281 03/06/96 007003 YALE'S BAKERS DOZEN COPIER METER USE/DEC 95 001-1208-4201 472.99 XEROX COPIER SUPPLIES 001-1208-4305 116.91 XEROX COPIER SUPPLIES 001-1208-4305 714.45 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 001-2110 500.00 TOTAL CHECKS 433.43 1,304.35 500.00 446,749.88 r VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 03/06/96 09:24 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 157,777.80 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 17,942.55 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 30,842.63 110 PARKING FUND 12,164.33 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 900.00 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 19.99 145 PROPOSITION ,A FUND 3,466.05 160 SEWER FUND 194,798.23 705 INSURANCE FUND 28,838.30 TOTAL 446,749.88 PAGE 13 VOUCHRE2 03/06/96 09:24 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES // TO INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR 4/41/6 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYME�E� CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. FINANCE DIRECTOR BY DATE *6/94 4 PAGE 14 w March 7, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council CR 4 17- AdoissARIJ o3-la— Regular Meeting of March 12, 1996 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS March 261996 6:00PM INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION xPPO1N1M vT OFMAY01? )WP 1 [ IYOR PRO r SPORE Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of 3/19/96. Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of 3/20/96. Community Resources Director Public Hearing: Zone change from M-1, light manufacturing, to R-2, two- family residential zone, or to such other zone as deemed appropriate by the City Council, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 330 & 342 Ardmore Avenue (the southeast corner of Ardmore Avenue and 4th Street) and including 615 3rd Street. Community Development Director Public Hearing: Text amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 7 to add a section in regards to require protective coating of metal handrails. Community Development Director Public Hearing: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds FY 95- 96. Community Development Director Appointments to the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission City Clerk Memo regarding Olympic Torch Run through Hermosa Beach Community Resources Director Text amendment to the Municipal Code to simplify the language of the encroachment permit code. Public Works Director Resolution regarding relocation of stop sign Public Works Director April 9, 1996 ........................... Report on east of Beach Drive walkstreet encroachment issues Community Development Director Downtown Streetscape - Lower Pier Avenue construction (Continued from meeting of January 23, 1996) Public Works Director April 23, 1996 Recommendation to deny claims Risk Manager April 30, 1996 7:00PM JOINT MEETING: CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION 1 c ase,* -96-3745 $t/alp(; '1644) 03-1Z-9, February 29, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 12, 1996 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH URGING LOCAL GOVERNANCE OF JOB TRAINING PROGRAMS BY THE SOUTH BAY PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL Recommended Action : Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Resolution supporting the continued utilization of the South Bay Private Industry Council for delivery of local Job Training Programs. Background: The City of Hermosa Beach provides qualified residents with employment related services through the South Bay Private Industry Council (SBPIC) with funding provided by the Job Training Partnership Act (DTPA). These employment services include assessment, training, retraining, on the job training (OJT), job development and job placement. The City of Redondo Beach provides direct services to Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach, and El Segundo residents, while the City of Inglewood serves as administrator for the overall JTPA program. Each City is represented on the Private Industry Council (PIC) by a business representative. This City's PIC representative is Mr. Rick Learned of Learned Lumber. Analysis : There are currently state and federal initiatives proposing transfer of responsibility for JTPA type training and employment services to the states from the federal government. The attached resolution requests that, regardless of what change is ultimately approved for funding training and employment services, the efficiency of the existing Private Industry Council structure in delivering cost effective services to area residents be recognized by the State. Respectfully submitted, C e ncur: Robert A. Blackwood, Director Step114 ' en T. Burrell City Manager Personnel & Risk Management 94-007/PIC ld 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, URGING LOCAL GOVERNANCE OF JOB TRAINING PROGRAMS BY THE SOUTH BAY PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL WHEREAS, Private Industry Councils and Service Delivery Areas designated under the Job Training Partnership Act are the national delivery system for employment training services; and: WHEREAS, the public/private partnership created by Local Elected Officials and Private Industry Councils, provide local autonomy, flexibility and accountability in developing and operating employment and training programs that address the existing and emerging business and community needs; and WHEREAS, Private Industry Councils always have a membership foundation of private sector representatives to ensure local economic factors are well addressed, and WHEREAS, Private Industry Councils have demonstrated for over twelve years their ability to develop effective employment training policies and collaborative partnerships to implement these policies; and WHEREAS, the Private Industry Council programs have consistently performed well under the most stringent standard set forth for publicly funded services; and WHEREAS, the South Bay Private Industry Council serving Inglewood, Hawthorne, Lawndale, EI Segundo, Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and Gardena has exceeded performance standards set forth by the United States Department of Labor for the past twelve years; and 1/ -1- rab/94-001/ressbpic.doc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 WHEREAS, the current governance structure utilized through Private Industry Councils and Chief Elected Officials has ensured that all residents of participating communities benefit from employment and training services funded through the Job Training Partnership Act; and WHEREAS, the Private Industry Council/Chief Elected Official partnership has earned national recognition for its leadership, innovative programs and services, and ability to produce an exemplary return on the invested resources; and WHEREAS, employment and training resources are a critical component of local economic development efforts; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Hermosa Beach, California, supports the development and implementation of a coordinated strategy to improve employment and training services accessibility to employers and job seekers. The City of Hermosa Beach supports those federal and state initiatives that augment the comprehensiveness and autonomy of the locally operated workforce development system. The City of Hermosa Beach supports capitalizing on the experience and success of the existing job training delivery system developed through the Job Training Partnership Act by designating the Private Industry Councils and Chief Elected Officials as the cooperative entities to be the leading mechanism for the development and delivery of employment and training services to youth and adults. -2- rab/94-001 /ressbpic. doc The City of Hermosa Beach supports the current structure and system of governance and administration that exists for the consortium of eight cities in the South Bay Service Delivery Area. The City of Hermosa Beach supports increasing the role of Private Industry Councils and Chief Elected Officials in addressing workforce transition needs, in particular the development of "one-stop shopping" systems that increase the availability of services to all employers and job seekers, and by providing leadership in forging new partnerships with other members of the employment and training community. The City of Hermosa Beach supports an increase in service options and strategies available to address local employment and training needs. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _th day of , 1996 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach , California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM City Clerk City Attorney -3- rab/94-001 /ressbpic. doc 5th c;L. <Woi Zj o3-(z-qh February 29, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 12, 1996 RECOMMENDATION TO SET DATES FOR BUDGET WORKSHOPS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council set workshop dates for review of the 1996-97 budget. The proposed dates are Thursday, May 23rd and Thursday, June 6, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. Background: The 1996-97 Proposed Budget will be delivered to the City Council on May 15, 1996. Typically, one or two workshops are held to review the proposed budget. Last year, two workshops were held in June. Analysis: The proposed dates allow ample time to prepare answers to any questions which may arise at the workshops. Budget adoption is scheduled for June 25, 1996. NOT D: Respectfully submitted: Step'' =n R. Burrell Viki Copeland City Manager Finance Director i i i) 6oek cam. Po4,440q #.47/. #/0/I (ThAtlimfo .3) Q 4 OF y/o%i ( X465` E51j 6.3 -1A - 7J PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 21, 1996 MEETING Roll Call Present: Chairperson Mitchell, Commissioners Abrams, Aronoff, Koppel Absent: Peirce Staff: Rooney / Flaherty Approval of Minutes January 17, 1996 Motion: "To approve as submitted." Koppel/Aronoff All Ayes Letter from Mrs. Nicolae: Receive and File Motion: "Place the issue of dogs in the parks on a future agenda and include a report on all citations issued for dogs in the park and/or violating the scooper law to date in 1996." Mitchell/Koppel All Ayes Matters for Commission Consideration Sand Debs Request for Theatre Fee Waiver Marsha Dyer - 337 - 4th Street, Manhattan Beach - Addressed the Commission to encourage them to approve the fee waiver. Motion: "To approve the request from the Sand Debs to waive performance, rehearsal, and clean-up fees plus damage deposit for the use of the Civic Theatre on April 18-19, 1996." Aronoff/Abrams All Ayes South Bav Free Clinic Lease Renewal for Room 11 Motion: "To approve (with corrections) the lease renewal for office lease space in the Community Center for the South Bay Free Clinic." Koppel/Abrams All Ayes 1f I Staff Direction: Please create a consent calendar format for lease agreements and routine approvals on future agendas. 1996 Commercial Event Applications Women's Professional Volleyball Association LeValley Pattision addressed the Commission on behalf of the WPVA. Motion: "To approve the Women's Pro Volleyball Tournament special event and contract as submitted." Koppel/Aronoff All Ayes International Management Group Motion: "To schedule discussion of the IMG - International Volleyball Tournament special event for the March 20, 1996 meeting so that the event sponsors can address the Commission." Aronoff/Abrams Ayes: Aronoff/Abrams/Mitchell; No: Koppel AAU Junior Volleyball Tournament Gino Grajeda addressed the Commission on behalf of the AAU. The AAU Junior Volleyball Tournament scheduled for July 17, 1996 was approved administratively. Event Productions Inc. - Jose Cuervo Volleyball Tournament/Concert Jason Fitzgerald addressed the Commission on behalf of Event Productions Inc. Motion: "To approve Event Productions Inc. Jose Cuervo Volleyball Tournament and Concert special events and contract as submitted. Note: Require a location specific site plan for the Council agenda. Also have concert band information for the Council." Aronoff/Koppel All Ayes CE Sports Jay Beyler addressed the Commission on behalf of CE Sports. Motion: "To approve CE Sports 4 -Man and 4 -Woman Pro Volleyball Tournament special event and contract as submitted. Note: Require a site specific map for the Council." Koppel/Aronoff All Ayes Association of Volleyball Professionals Matt Gage addressed the Commission on behalf of AVP. Motion: "To approve the AVP Hermosa Beach Volleyball Championship special event and contract as submitted with the following changes: AVP shall maintain public access openings on the Strand Wall (Pier); AVP shall provide VIP and truck parking requests prior to Council meeting (identify locations on site plan); and the AVP is invited to present Council with a concert proposal." Aronoff/Koppel All Ayes Spike -It -Up Volleyball Tournament Dale Hoffman addressed the Commission on behalf of Spike -It -Up. Motion: "To approve the Spike -It -Up Volley Tournament special event and contract as submitted." Koppel/Aronoff All Ayes Note: They will be looking for a community group to volunteer for the tournament in exchange for a $1500 donation. Michael Epstein Sports Productions - Sprint Triathlon Motion: "To schedule discussion of the Sprint Triathlon for the March 20, 1996 meeting so that the event sponsors can address the Commission." Mitchell/Aronoff All Ayes I Staff Report Clark Field Master Plan Motion: "Request from City Council to provide the Commission with procedural direction for park master planning." Aronoff/Koppel All Ayes Motion to adjourn: 10:07 p.m. Abrams/Aronoff All Ayes 1 February 29, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 31-46 Wee.. fro/1 C% ski 03 uv Regular Meeting of March 12, 1996 SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC LEASE RENEWAL FOR ROOM 11 IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the attached lease agreement between the City and the South Bay Free Clinic for the use of Room 11 in the Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached contract. Background On February 28, 1995 the South Bay Free Clinic requested to lease Room 11 in the Hermosa Beach Community Center for counseling sessions in connection with their HIV program. In 1992 they moved their HIV program administrative offices from their main facility in Manhattan Beach to Room 7 in the Community Center. Room 7 houses the "hot line" and the staff of the program. They conduct meetings, training and occasionally support groups but do not conduct any medical services. Analysis Revenue generated from the lease of Room 11 (400 sq. ft.) is $372 per month ($.93 sq. ft.). The attached lease conforms to the present rental policy (approved by Council on February 9, 1993) with all other conditions of the former lease remaining the same. IEstimated Fiscal Impact FY 1996-97: $4,464 1 Concur: esources,Director Stephen R. Burrell City Manager Respectfully submitted, Ma sha Ernst Administrative Aide Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director lt 1 HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 12th day of March, 1996, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and South Bay Free Clinic, (Lessee). A. Recitals: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Community Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One (1) year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1996, and ending on the 31st day of March , 1997. 2. Description of Premises. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 11 - 400 sq. ft. in the Community Center 3. Rent. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent according to the following schedule: April 1, 1996 through June 30, 1996: $372 per month ($.93) sq. ft. July 1, 1996 through March 31, 1997: Lease rate shall be according to the policy in effect at that time. I Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day ,other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental payment on the first day of the following month. 3A. Other Conditions. The following additional conditions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises/building or placed in any windows. 3. All window treatments must receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. All remodel work shall receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. Use. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Meeting Room and for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development 5. Insurance Liability. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a combined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) . Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. Worker's Compensation Insurance. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and furnish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be canceled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. Insurance Companies. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. Condition of the Premises Upon Termination of the Lease. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good condition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Lessee took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon demand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. Construction. Lessee is prohibited from making any alterations performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. Destruction, Partial Destruction or Necessity to Repair because of Conditions Caused by Other than Lessee. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the premises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction of repair if such reconstruction or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be terminated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. Hold Harmless. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any direct or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its officers, agents and employees arising out of the Lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all action, suits or other proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. Rules, Regulations and Ordinances. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Community Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. Taxes and Charges. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. Default. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pursuant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. Notice. Any notice required to be made or given pursuant to the provisions of this lease may be either personally served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Lessor: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 Lessee: SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC 1807 Manhattan Beach Blvd. Manhattan Beach, California 90266 Attn: Suzanne Rivera, Executive Director Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. Attorneys Fees. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee may not sublease all or any portion of the premises without the written consent of the City, which consent may be granted or denied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. Successors. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 17. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this lease both parties reserve the right to terminate the lease at any time and without cause upon giving 30 days written notice to other party. In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first herein above set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: Executive Director March 4, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council st ; , "/ /o// (801.0- ' ifze. cotaeleaas Regular Meeting of March 12, 1996 COMMISSION WORK PLAN FOR PARKS AND RECREATION CIP PROJECTS - FY 1996-97 i Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council approve the: 1. priority list for park and recreation facility CIPs; and 2. the park master planning process as outlined in the analysis below. Background At•their February 21, 1996 meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission requested that staff gain approval and/or direction from the City Council on priorities and procedures for capital improvement projects in our parks and recreation facilities. As Council is aware, the Parks Fund has recently been injected with $1.2 million with the early retirement of the UUT. Per the original ballot initiative, these funds are to be used for capital improvements in the City's parks, with Greenbelt improvements as a first priority. Analysis The Commissioners conducted a tour of all of the City's parks and recreation facilities to create the attached list of priorities. Some of the urgent priorities have already been attended to by Public Works staff Central to the Commission's focus for the 1996-97 Fiscal Year, they will be updating park master plans for major parks that will include: • Clark Stadium, • Valley Park, and • the Community Center. Master planning entails a comprehensive look at the various sites and will include: • Commission workshop meetings with residents, park users and neighbors. • Identification of desirable improvements and/or added features present and future. • The presentation of a conceptual plan to the City Council. 644/1- ©_ �2dec�ua�.2, Gt.SQ.- Qom_ --- ©_ rw - en �% ova/�% ^�lh r They would also like to revisit the South Park project to determine what elements of Phase II construction can be implemented with the available funding. The Commission looks forward to Council's input with regards to this process and hopes that Council involvement this early in the planning phase will help to ensure that the Commission's efforts are efficient and are meeting with Council objectives. IFiscal Impact: None 1 Other alternatives available to Council include: 1. Amend park priority list. 2. Amend master planning process. 3. Provide specific direction with regards to park master plans. Attachments: 1. 1995 CIP Priority List Respectfully Submitted, Mary Co C. ney unity Resources Director Concur: Stephen "4: rell City Manage 1995 COMMISSION PARKS TOUR: CIP PRIORITY LIST Park or Facility Urgent High Priority Medium Priority Valley Park • • • • • • Remove/replace barbecues Renovate restrooms Add tables .Create picnic area groupings Repaint sign Master Plan (b) Clark Stadium • Master Plan (a) Community Center • • • • Electrical upgrade Recarpet theatre Recarpet meeting rooms Master Plan (c) • • • • Refurbish patio area Drop ceiling lights through out building Paint / windows Tile hallway - north wing Edith Rodaway Friendship Park Sea View Park • • Repair fencing Repair drinking fountain • • Replace barbecue Repair walkway • Add playground equipment Fort Lots -o -Fun • Repair Drinking Fountain • . Add playground equipment Moondust Park • Paint and stripe court surface • Irrigation system Greenwood Park • Repair windmill • Prepare schematic and agreement for Council Bi -Centennial Park Kay-Etow Park • Remove stakes and replace as necessary • Add drinking fountain • Sprinkler system upgrade to automatic Ingleside Park 4th and Prospect 8th and Valley 1995 COMMISSION PARKS TOUR: CIP PRIORITY LIST Scout Park Ardmore Park • Trash pad • Add sign Greenbelt • • Irrigation Access at 4th • Remove paracourse Sandhill Parkette 3rd and Prospect Noble Park , • Complete lighting South Park • Complete Phase II of park construction Beach • Install Playground equipment • • Volleyball Courts Municipal Pier Strand • Examine specifications for light fixtures (rusting) • • Repair Strand Wall (north end) Improve lighting ktz 4/c I (= ; 664 03 March 4, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 12, 1996 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CITY HALL REMODEL RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Award professional services contract to Gills and Associates Architects to prepare construction documents and specifications for City Council chamber remodel, City Hall remodel and ADA requirements in the amount of $42,790.00. 2. Authorize director of public works to allow minor changes within the budgeted amount. BACKGROUND November 22, 1994, the City Council adopted the American Disability Act (ADA) compliance and transition plan. January 24, 1995, the City Council approve expediter of 95-96 grant estimated allocation and any additional allocation funding for the removal of architectural barriers to the disabled at the City Hall. December 28, 1995 staff sent out notice inviting proposals to 47 consultants and advertised in two news papers easy reader and La Opinion in Spanish as it was required. There are three components to this project: ADA compliance, City Council Chamber remodel, City Hall; Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments remodel. The consultant must prepare two alternative concept drawings for the project and prepare a priority list with the associated cost for the ADA requirements. The consultant will then prepare construction drawings and contract documents, detailed cost estimates associated with implementation of the proposed improvements. The ADA improvements will include but not limited to upgrading City Hall interior and exterior signs, drinking fountains, restrooms, visual and auditory alarms, access to and through rooms/spaces, areas for evacuation, access lifts/elevators, stairs/handrails, and required demolition, painting, and modifications. The Police and Fire Department remodel includes expanding the administration building to add approximately 500 S.F. to the existing building. The addition will involve removing the existing planting area and sidewalk along the northerly and easterly wall of the Fire Department (Exhibit A). The Public Works Department remodel will include tenant improvements to enhance the working area. Removal of the walls and creating offices for CAD system, drafting filing and personnel. The City Council remodel will include new sound and video system, creation of a special area for the video camera, and analyzing of the City Council chambers light, sound and video requirements. Compliance with ADA requirements. Alternatives to determine the best location for the entrance to the City Council and the atrium. Ii ANALYSIS On February 1, 1996 department of Public Works received four proposals from the following consultants: PC'I .............. Gills & Associates $40,290 + $2,500.00 Expenses Judani Architects $54 ,990.00 GTS Associates Inc. $95,270.00 HMC. $121,000 + $3,000.00 Expenses All four proposals were evaluated based on: Experience, Performance, Project Familiarity, Firms past history, and Compliance with request for proposal. Cumulative rating was in favor of Gills and Associates Architects which will best serve the City's interest. FISCAL IMPACT Funding for this work is available from the 1995-96 CDBG Allocation, Cable T.V. Franchise Transfer, and the 6% UUT Fund Balance. Contract Fee Expenses 15% Contingency Attachments Respectfully submitted: Homa CIP E n Behboodi weer Noted for Fiscal Impact: 6;.4-61et Viki Copeland Finance Director srl/homa\ada $40,290 $2,500 $6,418.50 $49,208.50 Concur: Amy 'r Public orks Director AA Steve R. Bu City Manager m 0o m C) 73 -C C7 -n -v= Dm E m0 ZCn -I 03 ETI02 PP -0 Po bp IT/ON ti .�...'�...,..:=ate! FRO� o ' K, poLice FI RE DEPARTMENT REHODEL . 1/0//(tom d a, )t 96-679-4, M�'rch 5, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council • March 12, 1996 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR THE FORMATION OF A HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DURING FY 1996 - 1997 Recommendation: 1. Adopt the attached resolution ordering the preparation of a report for the formation of the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during fiscal year 1996 - 97.. Background: The Landscaping and Street Lighting Assessment District provides for the installation, maintenance and operation of the City's landscaping and street lighting program currently allowed by the 1972 Act. Analysis: The Landscaping and Street Lighting District must be renewed annually in the same fashion that was utilized in its creation using the same district map. In approving the attached resolution, the Council authorizes the preparation of a report which will contain plans, specifications, costs and estimated assessments for the Landscaping and Street Lighting District. This report will then be submitted to the City Council at which time the City Council will review the report. Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Let the District lapse; thereby, causing a potential increased General Fund obligation of approximately $593,262. 2. Retain the district and modify level of service. Respectfully submitted, deh ,..4- Homayo n Behboodi Capital Improvement Program Engineer Concur: 04n.a,a4t: Amy AnhIrani Director of Public Works Attachments: Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report. lj ccstland.doc RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4, CHAPTER 1, PART 2 OF "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", BEING DIVISION 15, STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF OR PLANTING LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING FIXTURES, APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK AND THE MAINTENANCE THEREOF IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1996 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1997. HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1996-1997 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, proposes to renew the assessment district pursuant to the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Street and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the said assessment district shall include all parcels of land within the said City and shall be designated as the HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1996-1997"; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to install and maintain certain landscaping, lighting fixtures and lighting appurtenances, provide required appurtenant work and improve the existing landscaping and street lighting system each year as funds become available and as the City Council and City staff designate; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to improve and maintain the City's landscaping, to furnish the energy and to maintain the street lighting system, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Director of Public Works is hereby ordered to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the installation of certain landscaping, street lighting fixtures, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 appurtenances and appurtenant work and the maintenance thereof for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 1996 and ending June 30, 1997 all set forth in this resolution. SECTION 2. That a certified copy of this resolution be presented to the said Director of Public Works for his/her information and guidance. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceeding of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th day of March, 1996. ATTEST: APPROVED A PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , CITY CLERK S TO FORM: , CITY ATTORNEY -2- 1 1 0 March 5, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 09,4oue Sf Hloi/ �� j1*. Regular Meeting of March 12, 1996 1 SOUTH BAY COALITION LEASE EXTENSION Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council approve the attached request from the South Bay Coalition for a one (1) month extension to lease Room 4 in the Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached amendment. Background The South Bay Coalition has leased Room 4 in the Community Center since April, 1987. Funding for the organization is no longer available and they will be leaving the Community Center. Their current lease runs through March 31, 1996 but they would like to stay through April, 1996 and are requesting a one month extension to their regular lease. Room 4 (798 sq. ft.) leases for $742 per month at the current lease rate of $.93 per square foot. Analysis It is recommended that the South Bay Coalition be allowed to extend their current lease through April, 1996 as they have been excellent tenants and their residency in the Community Center has been of great value in addressing a vital social service function in Hermosa Beach. Fiscal Impact: $742 (rent for one month) Attachments: 1. Letter of request 2. Current lease 3. Amendment Respectfully Submitted, Noted for Fiscal Impact: Marsha Ernst Community Resources Dept. Concur: Mary ' •-- ey Co ►i unity Resources Director Viki Copeland Finance Director Stephen R. 11 City Manager lk South Bay Coalition March 5, 1996 City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach Community Center 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Marsha Ernst Dear Ms. Ernst: To confirm a previous letter to you from the Coalition, Room 4 will be needed by the Coalition through April, 1996. It is requested that the current lease be extended until April 30, 1996. Your consideration of this request is appreciated. Sincerely, Karen Carr Executive Director Working together to prevent substance abuse. 710 Pier.-irrenue. Room Four. Hermosa Beach.California 90254 Phone: 310.318.8649 Fac: 310.318.8659 HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 14th day of March, 1995, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and South Bay Coalition (Lessee). A. Recitals: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Community Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered • into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One (1) year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1995, and ending on the 31st day of March , 1996. 2. Description of Premises. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 4 - 798 sq. ft. in the Community Center 3. Rent. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent according to the following schedule: April 1, 1995 through June 30, 1995: $718 per month ($.90) sq. ft. July 1, 1995 through March 31, 1996: $742 per month ($.93) sq. ft. Payable on the first day of the month. 'If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental payment on the first day of the following month. 3A. Other Conditions. The following additional conditions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises/building or placed in any windows. 3. All window treatments must receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. All remodel work shall receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. Use. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: House Coalition staff and site for bi-monthly meetings of Executive Committee and for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development 5. Insurance Liability. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a combined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. Worker's Compensation Insurance. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and furnish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. Insurance Companies. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. Condition of the Premises Upon Termination of the Lease. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good condition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Lessee took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon demand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. Construction. Lessee is prohibited from making any alterations performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. Destruction, Partial Destruction or Necessity to Repair because of Conditions Caused by Other than Lessee. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the premises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction of repair if such reconstruction or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be terminated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. Hold Harmless. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any direct or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its officers, agents and employees arising out of the Lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all action, suits or other proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. Rules, Regulations and Ordinances. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Community Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. Taxes and Charges. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. Default. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pursuant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. Notice. Any notice required to be made or given pursuant to the provisions of this lease may be either personally served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Lessor: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 Lessee: SOUTH BAY COALITION 200 N. Pacific Coast Hwy Redondo Beach, California 90277 Karen Carr, Director Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. Attorneys Fees. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee may not sublease all or any portion of the premises without the written consent of the City, which consent may be granted or denied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. Successors. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 17. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this lease both parties reserve the right to terminate the lease at any time and without cause upon giving 30 days written notice to other party. In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first herein above set forth. APPROVED • S TO FORM: DATE: CITY 0 Munici By M. or SA BEACH a ion, Lessor CITY ATTORNEY AMENDMENT TO HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This amendment is made and entered into on this, the 12th day of March, 1996 by and between the South Bay Coalition and the City of Hermosa Beach to extend the current lease for a period of one (1) month from April 1, 1996 through April 30, 1996 for Room 4 in the Hermosa Beach Community Center. Room 4 is 798 sq. ft. and at the current lease rate of $.93 sq. ft. the monthly rent is $742/mo. All other conditions of the current lease shall remain in effect during the extended time period. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: Ex cuxive irector 1Z5 '•• 3461 46' tq (. #05551 Eiefeis 03-12-% March 5, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 12, 1996 West Coast Basin Barrier Project Easement Deed for facility operation and maintenance Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the easement agreement which grants the Los Angeles County Flood Control District rights of ingress and egress to their recently installed observation well located at 24th Street and the Greenbelt. Background: At their regular meeting of September 27, 1994, the Hermosa Beach City Council approved the plans and specifications and granted permission to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to construct an observation well at 24th Street and the Greenbelt. The County of Los Angeles currently maintains and operates a number of observation wells along the Greenbelt as well as other locations in the City. These wells are used to monitor the intrusion of seawater into the freshwater aquifer. On June 26, 1995 the County's contractor began drilling operations on the Greenbelt for the installation of the well. Construction of the well was completed on July 18, 1995. Analysis: Construction of the observation well is complete and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District is now seeking to acquire a permenant easement for the continued operation and maintenance of the facility. Attached please find an original and duplicate of the Easement Deed for the observation well. The area of the easment is 13' x 30' , 390 square feet. Because the Rotary Club and Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority are Lessees of a portion of the Greenbelt both entities have a possessory interest in the land . 11 In order to protect the City and the County both entities should be contacted and requested to sign the attached Consents. Fiscal Impact: No impact. Respectfully submitted, Joseph C. Mankawich Capital Improvement Program Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance Concur: amitzuf1/4_, Amy Am•ani Director of Public Works Stephen City M. ger ORIGINAL PROJECT WEST C JT BASIN BARRIER PROJECT FILE WITH PCL. NO. P-142 C.I. 25 (A4) DATE March 23, 1994 T.G. 762(G11NEW/62(C6)OLD LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P.O. BOX 1460 900 S. FREMONT AVE., 10TH FLOOR ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 ALHAMBRA, CA 91803 TELEPHONE (818) 458-7093 PERMIT The undersigned hereby grant(s) permission to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (acting at various times for the Los Angeles County Flood Control District and the County of Los Angeles), its agents and invitees, to enter upon and use that portion of the property of the undersigned, shown coded on the map attached hereto (AMB 4184-26) and made a part hereof for the purpose(s) indicated below: ❑ Placement of fill material ❑ Ingress and egress ❑ Temporary construction area ❑ Installation of water pipe lines ❑ Construction of ❑ Traffic signal installation ❑ Reconstruction of driveway ❑ Drilling test hole(s) for soil sampling ❑ Construction of a temporary detour ❑ Grading to drain ❑ Construction of slopes 09 Other Construct, overate and maintain an observation well. Code RED 0 It is understood that upon completion of the above work, the property so used shall be restored to a condition comparable to that existing prior to the time of construction. The permissive rights hereby granted shall be for a period beginning May 1, 1994, and ending upon acquisition of permanent right of way. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works agrees, to the extent it may legally do so, to indemnify and save harmless the undersigned from any and all liability, loss or damage to which the undersigned may be subjected arising out of the exercise by said Department or its agents or employees of any of the rights granted to it by this instrument. Dated April 78 1494 Ap.roved as to Execution pted iAssistan' .eputy Director Copies of approved permit sent to: MAPPING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DIVISION COPY RETAIN )1,1 DIVISION FILES AFTER EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 04/14 By DirecCor of Public Works By Address: City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ZA:ayc/mpm101/PZA2 Division. 4 I26 ' a 200' SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SAUSAL REDONDO RANCHO S.C.C.116 29 C.F. 218 CODE 4340 FOR PREV. ASSMT. SEE: 4184 . 21 9000toMoo/soF. r ASSESSOR'S NAP COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIF. URIUINAL RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P.O. Box 1460 Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 Attn: Mapping & Property Mgmt. Div. R/W Engineering Section pace Asove is Line EASEMENT esery or Recoraer s se WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT P-142WL 176 -RW 16 A.M.B 4184-026-900 T.G. 62(C6)Old T.G. 762(G1)New I.M. 25(A4) S.D. 4 FG0017 For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation, as owner and as Lessee and Optionee under a Lease Agreement recorded September 28, 1989, as Document No. 89-1568227, of Official Records, in the office of the Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", does hereby grant to LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic, hereinafter referred to as "District", a perpetual easement to construct, operate and maintain an observation well in, on, over, under and across the real property in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Together with the further right to deposit tools, implements and other materials thereon by said District, its officers, agents and employees, and by persons under contract with it and their employees whenever and wherever necessary for the purposes above set forth. It is understood that the undersigned Grantor grants said easement only in, on, over, under and across that portion of the herein -described land which is owned by said Grantor or in which said Grantor has an interest. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, on , 19 the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation, has caused this Easement document to be executed by its duly authorized officer, pursuant to a resolution of its City Council. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation By Mayor (City Seal) ATTEST: By City Clerk TKA: av/mpm/wpp28/mos WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT P-142WL 176 -RW 16 A.M.B. 4184-026-900 T.G. 62(C6)Old T.G. 762(G1)New I.M. 25(A4) S.D. 4 FG0017 PARCEL NO. P-142WL (Easement for observation well): That portion of Section 36, Township 3 South, Range 15 West, Subdivision of the Part of the Sausal Redondo Rancho, as shown on map filed in Case No. 11629 of the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, a copy of said map is filed as Clerk's Filed Map No. 218, in the office of the Director of the Department of Public Works of said County, within a strip of land 15 feet wide, the easterly side line of said strip being described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the center line of Ardmore Avenue (formerly East Railroad Drive), and the center line of 24th Street (formerly Plummer Court), as both said center lines are shown on map of Tract No. 38200, filed in Book 970, pages 73 and 74, of Maps, in the office of the Recorder of said County, said center line of Ardmore Avenue having a bearing of North 21° 03' 21" West for purposes of this description; thence South 68° 56' 39" West 15.00 feet to the westerly side line of Ardmore Avenue (formerly East Railroad Drive), 30 feet wide, as shown on map of Hermosa View Tract No. 2, filed in Book 10, page 40, of said Maps; thence along said westerly side line, North 21° 03' 21" West 5.50 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 21° 03' 21" East 26.00 feet. Containing: 390 square feet AZ:jb wp#133/LDAZ ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM State of } County of } On before me, ,the undersigned, personally appeared (insert name and title) personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature (Seal) (Name, Typed or Printed) NOTARIES: ATTACH ADDITIONAL OR OTHER FORMS, IF REQUIRED State of California County of Los Angeles } } } FOR COUNTY USE ONLY On before me, BEATRIZ VALDEZ, Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their/signature(s) on the instrument the persons, or the entity on behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have here set my hand. BEATRIZ VALDEZ, REGISTRAR -RECORDER/ COUNTY CLERK of the County of Los Angeles By Deputy County Clerk CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within deed or grant is hereby accepted under the authority conferred by Ordinance No. 85-0108, duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles on the 18th day of June, 1985, and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated By ASSISTANT DEPUTY DIRECTOR MAPPING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 101ack3 ORIGINAL RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P.O. Box 1460 Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 Attn: Mapping & Property Mgmt. Div. R/W Engineering Section Space Above This Line Reserved For Recorder's Use WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT P-142WL 176 -RW 16 A.M.B. 4184-026-900 T.G. 62(C6)O1d T.G. 762(G1)New I.M. 25(A4) S.D. 4 FG0017 CONSENT TO GRANT OF EASEMENT WHEREAS, HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB is the Lessee under an unrecorded Lease dated January 1, 1956, as disclosed by a Grant Deed recorded December 21, 1989, as Document No. 89-2054585, of Official Records, in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, affecting property in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, a portion of which is hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, Los Angeles County Flood Control District, a body corporate and politic, proposes to acquire a perpetual easement to construct, operate and maintain an observation well from the owner of record, and has requested said HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB to consent to the proposed grant of easement by the owner of record of said real property. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB, as such Lessee, reserving nevertheless all its rights in and to said real property, does hereby consent to the proposed grant of easement for an observation well, by said owner of record to Los Angeles County Flood Control District, in, on, over, under and across the real property in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, on , 19 HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB, has caused this Consent To Grant Of Easement to be executed by its duly authorized officers, pursuant to a resolution of its governing body. HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB By By TKA:av/wp mpm:05/hb WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT P-142WL 176 -RW 16 A.M.B. 4184-026-900 T.G. 62(C6)Old T.G. 762(G1)New I.M. 25(A4) S.D. 4 FG0017 PARCEL NO. P-142WL (Easement for observation well): That portion of Section 36, Township 3 South, Range 15 West, Subdivision of the Part of the Sausal Redondo Rancho, as shown on map filed in Case No. 11629 of the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, a copy of said map is filed as Clerk's Filed Map No. 218, in the office of the Director of the Department of Public Works of said County, within a strip of land 15 feet wide, the easterly side line of said strip being described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the center line of Ardmore Avenue (formerly East Railroad Drive), and the center line of 24th Street (formerly Plummer Court), as both said center lines are shown on map of Tract No. 38200, filed in Book 970, pages 73 and 74, of Maps, in the office of the Recorder of said County, said center line of Ardmore Avenue having a bearing of North 21° 03' 21" West for purposes of this description; thence South 68° 56' 39" West 15.00 feet to the westerly side line of Ardmore Avenue (formerly East Railroad Drive), 30 feet wide, as shown on map of Hermosa View Tract No. 2, filed in Book 10, page 40, of said Maps; thence along said westerly side line, North 21° 03' 21" West 5.50 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 21° 03' 21" East 26.00 feet. Containing: 390 square feet AZ:jb wp#133/LDAZ ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM State of } } County of } On before me, , the undersigned, personally appeared (insert name and title) personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature (Seal) (Name, Typed or Printed) NOTARIES: ATTACH ADDITIONAL OR OTHER FORMS, IF REQUIRED State of California County of Los Angeles } } } FOR COUNTY USE ONLY On before me, BEATRIZ VALDEZ, Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the persons, or the entity on behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have here set my hand. BEATRIZ VALDEZ, REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK of the County of Los Angeles By Deputy County Clerk npm/O1ack1 uniUIIVtL RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P.O. Box 1460 Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 Attn: Mapping & Property Mgmt. Div. R/W Engineering Section Space Above This Line Reserved For Recorder's Use WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT P-142WL 176 -RW 16 A.M.B. 4184-026-900 T.G. 62(C6)O1d T.G. 762(G1)New I.M. 25(A4) S.D. 4 FG0017 CONSENT TO GRANT OF EASEMENT WHEREAS, INDEPENDENT CITIES LEASE FINANCE AUTHORITY, a joint exercise of powers agency, is the Lessee under a Lease Agreement recorded September 28, 1989, as Document No. 89-1568226, of Official Records, in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, affecting property in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, a portion of which is hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, Los Angeles County Flood Control District, a body corporate and politic, proposes to acquire a perpetual easement to construct, operate and maintain an observation well from the owner of record, and has requested said INDEPENDENT CITIES LEASE FINANCE AUTHORITY, a joint exercise of powers agency, to consent to the proposed grant of easement by the owner of record of said real property. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, INDEPENDENT CITIES LEASE FINANCE AUTHORITY, a joint exercise of powers agency, as such Lessee, reserving nevertheless all its rights in and to said real property, does hereby consent to the proposed grant of easement for an observation well, by said owner of record to Los Angeles County Flood Control District, in, on, over, under and across the real property in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, on , 19 INDEPENDENT CITIES LEASE FINANCE AUTHORITY, a joint exercise of powers agency, has caused this Consent To Grant Of Easement to be executed by its duly authorized officers, pursuant to a resolution of its governing body. (SEAL) TKA:av/wp mpm:05/hb INDEPENDENT CITIES LEASE FINANCE AUTHORITY, a joint exercise of powers agency, By President By Secretary WEST COAST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT P-142WL 176 -RW 16 A.M.B. 4184-026-900 T.G. 62(C6)Old T.G. 762(G1)New I.M. 25(A4) S.D. 4 FG0017 PARCEL NO. P-142WL (Easement for observation well): That portion of Section 36, Township 3 South, Range 15 West, Subdivision of the Part of the Sausal Redondo Rancho, as shown on map filed in Case No. 11629 of the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, a copy of said map is filed as Clerk's Filed Map No. 218, in the office of the Director of the Department of Public Works of said County, within a strip of land 15 feet wide, the easterly side line of said strip being described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the center line of Ardmore Avenue (formerly East Railroad Drive), and the center line of 24th Street (formerly Plummer Court), as both said center lines are shown on map of Tract No. 38200, filed in Book 970, pages 73 and 74, of Maps, in the office of the Recorder of said County, said center line of Ardmore Avenue having a bearing of North 21° 03' 21" West for purposes of this description; thence South 68° 56' 39" West 15.00 feet to the westerly side line of Ardmore Avenue (formerly East Railroad Drive), 30 feet wide, as shown on map of Hermosa View Tract No. 2, filed in Book 10, page 40, of said Maps; thence along said westerly side line, North 21° 03' 21" West 5.50 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 21° 03' 21" East 26.00 feet. Containing: 390 square feet EXHWIT AZ:jb wp#133/LDAZ State of County of On personally appeared ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM } } } before me, , the undersigned, (insert name and title) personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature (Seal) (Name, Typed or Printed) NOTARIES: ATTACH ADDITIONAL OR OTHER FORMS, IF REQUIRED State of California County of Los Angeles } } } FOR COUNTY USE ONLY On before me, BEATRIZ VALDEZ, Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the persons, or the entity on behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have here set my hand. BEATRIZ VALDEZ, REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK of the County of Los Angeles By Deputy County Clerk mpm/01ack1 -re. 440-e_ Pubs 4 kae . c c_ Caws rad,1 . CO/ A.Ec twCk� •4'/o// (R4ls R.s F colo o 4, 2 ACTION MINUTES ' 63 - DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL CHAMBER March 6, 1996 6:00 P.M. 1. James H. Dewey 2. Jerry Newton 3. Dean Nota 4. Patricia Spiritus 5. Ron Pizer 1. Roll CaII . Pledge of Allegiance 2. Public Comments: NONE 3. Consent Calendar 3.1 Approval of Minutes 2/7/96 3.2 Finance Report 3.3 Allright Parking Report 3.4 Upcoming Planning Commission Items APPROVED 5:0 4. Calendared Items 4.1 Downtown Banner Program - Selection of Design PROPOSED DESIGN PRESENTED BY CONSULTANT: "SYNTHESIS", ACTION: DESIGN APPROVED 5:0 4.2 Follow-up Discussion of DEC/Parks & Rec Commission Joint Meeting JURISDICTION OF CLASS III AND CLASS IV EVENTS DISCUSSED: ACTION: COMM. SPIRITUS MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT CITY COUNCIL TRANSFER PERMITTING AUTHORITY OF CLASS Ill AND CLASS IV EVENTS FROM PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION TO D.E.C. MOTION APPROVED 4:1, (DEWEY DISSENTING) 4.3 Consideration of Changes to Street Closure Policy ACTION: TO TABLE DISCUSSION PENDING COUNCIL RESPONSE TO ABOVE RECOMMENDATION 5. Staff Items 5.1 Review of Advertising Budget RECEIVED AND FILED 6. Commissioner Items 7. Tentative Future Agenda ADDED TO APRIL AGENDA: • REVIEW OF IN -LIEU PARKING PROGRAM • CONSIDERATION OF HIRING EVENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY FOR STREET CLOSURES IN CONJUNCTION WITH CLASS 111 BEACH EVENTS FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADDED: • DEC SPONSORED BEAUTIFICATION PROGRAM 8. Next Meeting April 3, 1996 9. Adjournment Mayor and Members of the City Council .56-aekt PC, 6ar.., 5 opa,sro 0 w/ to % antfn dt s c�efrex-.ud�6.6(44- C; s r— ,oek, R- (s> , 03 -I — 4-G March 4, 1996 City Council Meeting March 12, 1996 41071,1 -DopTE ORDINANCE NO. 96-1152 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE R-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 4-3(12) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO MAKE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE A PROPORTION OF LOT SIZE (10%) AND TO MODIFY THE EXCEPTION FOR LOTS OF 2500 SQUARE FEET OR LESS, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Submitted for a clarification from the City Council, per the memorandum from Community development Director Sol Blumenfeld, prior to adoption is Ordinance No. 96-1152, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of February 27, 1996, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was amended to increase the small lot size to 2500 square feet. The ordinance was then introduced, as amended, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Benz, Edgerton, Oakes Reviczky, Mayor Bowler None None Noted: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM Date: March 5, 1996 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Sol Blumenfeldrector Community Development Department Subject: Clarification on Amendments to the R-1 Open Space Requirements for Small Lots. Reconsideration of the Proportional Open Space Requirement (10% of Lot Size) The City Council approved the referenced amendments relative to lots "2500 square feet" or less. In reviewing the action, it was not clear whether the Council intent was to approve the Planning Commission recommendation relative to the 2500 square foot cut-off for the proportional total open space standard (part 1), or to expand the exception to ground level open space (part 2), to those lots in the 2100 to 2500 square foot range. (See footnote below) The Planning Commission never considered this proposed change and if Council's intent is to include the second provision in the 2500 square foot category the matter would need to be referred back to the Commission for review and comment prior to adoption. Further, if the matter is to be reconsidered, staff also recommends that lots sized 2501 to 4000 square feet be considered with respect the new open space standard. There is an inequity resulting from not applying the proportional open space standard on the total open space requirement to lots greater than 2500 square feet. The table below summarizes the net effect to various lot sizes: Lot Size Current Planning Commission Net Effect - Requirement Recommended open space (10% of Lot Size with 400 requirement sq. Ft. Minimum still applying to lots >2500 sq. ft.) 1500 2100 2300 2500 2501-4000 5000 300 150 -150 300 210 -90 400 230 -170 400 250 -150 400 400 400 500 +100 Lots which exceed 2500 square feet (2501 - 4000) are guided by the existing 400 square feet open space provision. The new regulations create an inequitable situation for lots of very similar lot sizes. If the 10% rule was applied to all lot sizes, the result would be a more equitable graduated scale reflecting the 10% proportion of lot size (thus a 2600 square foot lot would require 260 square feet of open space, a 3000 square foot lot 300 square feet, etc.) While the 2100 square foot cut-off point for the blanket exception to ground open space creates a similar problem, it was created to resolve an inequity and a hardship for lots of a common size in one district'. The proposed development standards for ground level open space and the 10% open space rule based upon percentage of lot size are intended to provide relief from different building conditions. (Design flexibility for small lots in a unique district and proportional reduction of the open space requirements). The 10 % rule currently applies to most lot size categories with the exception of lots which are 2501 - 4000 square feet. 4000 square feet lots are subject to an open space requirement which is approximately 8% of lot size. The Planning Commission recommendation was to amend the R-1 open space standards in two ways, as follows: 1. The total open space requirement: To change the requirement for all R-1 lots to be 10% of lot size, provided that lots with greater than 2500 square feet have a minimum of 400 square feet This would replace the current minimum of 400 square feet that applies to all lots. 2. The exception that already applies to lots of 2100 square feet or less: To allow all the open space to be provided on decks and balconies provided that at least 60% is directly and horizontally accessible to primary living areas, a portion of which is at the same level. This would replace the current maximum of 33% of the total that can be provided on decks and balconies. Note: the current total requirement for lots <2100 square feet is 300 square feet.' ) 3. The 2100 square foot lot size cut-off point is a historical distinction and exception to recognize the unique situation of the R-1 lots between 30th Street and Longfellow in the Shakespeare Tract. These lots are generally 30' X 70'. They, are surrounded by lots in the Tract which vary in size (typ'cally 30' X 80', with some variation) but which are zoned R-2 and are thus already are allowed greater he'ght, 30', and allowed to provide all open space on decks. ORDINANCE NO. 96 - 1152 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE R-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 4-3(12) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO MAKE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE A PROPORTION OF LOT SIZE (10%) AND TO MODIFY THE EXCEPTION FOR LOTS OF 2500 SQUARE FEET OR LESS, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on February 27, 1996 to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to amend the R-1 open space requirements, to consider the negative declaration, and to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The current requirements for open space are necessary to protect the public welfare as they serve to preserve the character of residential neighborhoods and the compatibility of new development with existing development, in addition to providing for light, air, yard space, and avoiding the construction of box -like structures. B. The current method of requiring open space, however, does not adequately recognize the unique situations and difficulties in constructing homes that meet current market standards for size and convenience; C. Currently required open space is a minimum amount (400 square feet), without consideration of lot size, while a requirement based on a proportion of lot size would recognize the variety of lot sizes throughout the City, and allow for more flexibility of design on smaller lots; D. The City Council concurs with the . Planning Commission and the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their environmental assessment/initial study, that this subject text amendments will result in a less than -1- significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby ordain that the Municipal Code, Appendix A, Zoning Ordinance,be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 4-3(12) to read as follows: "Open Space. Usable open space shall be provided on site, in a minimum amount equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the lot size, provided that lots greater than 2500 square feet shall have a minimum of 400 square feet. Twenty-five (25%) of the usable open space may be provided in balconies or decks. Usable open space shall have minimum dimensions of ten (10) feet in length and width. Required front, and/or side yards, driveways, turning areas, and parking areas shall be excluded from the open space computation. (a) Lots of 2500 square feet or less in area shall be allowed minimum dimensions of seven (7) feet in length and width, and all of the required usable open space may be provided on balconies or decks, provided that at least sixty percent (60%) is directly accessible to primary living areas (living rooms, family rooms, and kitchen and living room or family room combinations). and located on the same floor level as the accessible primary living area." SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 12th day of March, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: AB SENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -3- qlC// as -t2-9,4) March 4, 1996 City Council Meeting March 12, 1996 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 96-1153 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING OPEN SPACE OVERLAY (OS -0) ZONE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE PARKING SECTION TO INCLUDE RESTRICTIONS ON THE LOCATION OF OPEN PARKING ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AND IMPOSING THE PROPOSED OS -O ZONE TO DESIGNATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AREAS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED, WHEN THEY ARE VACATED, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 96-1153, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of February 27, 1996, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was amended to include Open Space Zone in Section 1157(F) and to delete flag poles from the prohibited use list. The ordinance was then introduced, as amended, by the following vote: AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None E aine Dorf in-% t y Clerk Noted: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager 2b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 . 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 96 - 1153 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING OPEN SPACE OVERLAY (OS -O) ZONE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE PARKING SECTION TO INCLUDE RESTRICTIONS ON THE LOCATION OF OPEN PARKING ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AND IMPOSING THE PROPOSED OS -0 ZONE TO DESIGNATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AREAS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A ATTACHED, WHEN THEY ARE VACATED, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on February 28, 1996 to consider oral and written testimony, and made the following Findings: A. The proposed OS -O overlay zone will provide a means to implement the legal settlement, Allen et al vs. City of Hermosa Beach; B. By amending the Parking Section of the Zoning Ordinance as proposed the issue of where open parking on residential lots is allowed will be addressed; C. Designated public right-of-way areas that may be vacated have been identified on attached Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain amending the zoning ordinance text and map be amended as follows: SECTION 1: Amend Section 1157, Off -Street Parking Location, by adding the following: "F. Open parking spaces for residential uses in the Open Space Zone (OS -O) shall be located only within the rear 50% or in the rear 40 feet whichever is the lesser of a residential lot." SECTION 2: Add the following to the zoning ordinance text: "Article 9.53, OS -O, Open Space Overlay Sec. 9.53-1 Intent and Purpose The OS -O zone is intended to limit the intensity of use of areas beyond limitations prescribed by the primary, or underlying zoning. Sec. 9.53-2 Permitted Uses Only the following uses shall be permitted: Landscaping (hardscape / softscape) -1- Open vehicle and motorcycle parking (In designated areas per Section 9.3-5) Walls and fences Barbecue / fire pits Bird baths Lighting Ponds Table / chairs Decks Fountains Prohibited uses: Spas Swimming pools Furniture designed for indoors use Storage of any type Sheds Parking / storage of (a) Non -registered, or expired registered vehicles (b) Commercial trucks (c) Motorhomes (d) Trailers (e) Boats (f) Campers, off of vehicles Sec. 9.5-3 Use and Development Standards 1. Landscaping A. Landscaping shall be limited in height to a maximum of 36". 2. Fences/Walls A. A permanent barrier, between the parking area, and the remaining area shall be installed and maintained in good condition. 1) Existing barrier walls may be deemed in compliance with this ordinance by the City Council. 2) Barrier walls shall be a maximum of 36" in height, and a minimum of 24" in height, and a maximum of forty (40) feet from the rear property line. 3) Barrier walls shall be of a solid material, permanent in nature, and non-movable; chain link, chains, fencing on hinges, and removable metal poles are prohibited. B. Perimeter fences/walls may be installed, and shall comply with all provisions of Section 1215 of the zoning ordinance pertaining to fencing, except that no fence shall be over 36" in height. 3. Structures A. Decks shall have a maximum height of 12" and all other permitted structures shall have a maximum height of 36", except tables and chairs which may be of standard height. B. Ponds shall not exceed 1 1/2 feet in depth, and/or a diameter of 10 feet. 4. Primary Zone A. The portion of a lot with OS -O zoning shall not be used for calculation of allowable lot coverage, density, setbacks, open space, and/or guest parking for development of the total lot. 5. Parking Areas A. Parking areas shall be paved and maintained in good condition and governed by Sec. 1157(F) of the zoning ordinance. B. Vehicular access shall be prohibited from walk -streets, except in locations leading to legally permitted enclosed parking. Sec. 9.5-4 Waiver At the time any public right-of-way is considered for vacation and the OS -O Overlay zone is proposed, the City Council may waive by resolution any OS -O use and development standard(s), if a hardship finding can be made." -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3: Official Zoning Map Public right-of-way areas as shown on the attached maps, Exhibit A-1 through A-5, shall have the OS -O, Open SpaceOverlay zone imposed at the time the subject areas are ever vacated. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 5: Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 12th day of March, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -4- March 4, 1996 Honorable „ayo'r and Members of the Hermosa B ch City Council ' ua� -r rS a,P4-2--�- b °t s(°/i 03 -ta- Regular Meeting of March 12, 1996 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the following events for the 1996 season and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached contracts: Event 1. WPVA - Women's Pro Volleyball Tournament 2. Event Productions - Amateur Volleyball Tournament 3. CE Sports - 4 Man & 4 -Woman Pro Volleyball Tournament 4. AVP - Hermosa Beach Volleyball Championships 5. Spike -It -Up Amateur Volleyball Tournament Background Dates May 3-5 14 July 20-21 11 13 August 16-18 August 23-25 September 7-8 A - Each year the City hosts a number of commercial and special events. The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission serves as the first approval stop for these events prior to Council review. At their February 21, 1996 meeting, the Commission thoroughly reviewed and approved the events and attached contracts. Analysis It is suggested that Council review the events one at a time, focusing first on "repeat" events followed by full presentation and review of the "first time" events. In order to provide the Council with additional information about each proposed event, site maps and recommended City contracts are included in Attachment B. Attached you will find a table summarizing all of the events as well as a calendar illustrating the flow of each event from set-up to tear -down (Attachment A). Council Members may notice that the schedule is compacted in August with CE Sports and the AVP overlapping in tear -down and set-up days. CE Sports requested this new date in order to avoid directly competing with the Summer Olympics. Both organizations have agreed to share a bleacher company (and bleachers) to reduce the impact of the transition. Council will also note that three events included on the grid and calendar are not included in the approval list for this evening. The 1MG International Pro Volleyball Tournament and Day at the Beach Triathlon will be reviewed by the Commission at their March 20, 1996 meeting and forwarded to City Council at the April 9, 1996 meeting. The AAU event requires only administrative approval and is not subject to commercial event policies. It is included in the item (as are some community events) to give Council a better overview of the event schedule for 1996. 4 T1 Consistent with last year, the AVP will charge admission for no more than 25 percent of the total stadium seating. Pending Coastal Commission approval, the AVP will be returning to City Council to obtain approval to charge admission for all stadium seats. In that event, the City's share of admission revenue would increase. As Council is•aware, the DEC indicated a strong desire to work with event operators to expand the use of the venues and to be more inclusive of the downtown area. Staff has added provisions in the contract to encourage cooperative efforts on the part of event operators and to expand event presence on lower Pier Avenue. Notwithstanding the continued refinements Hermosa Beach makes on event contracts, it is important for the City to keep mindful of the approach other cities take in hosting these events including making concessions on fees and in some cases, even paying for host services. The Council has indicated a strong desire for the City to continue hosting and encouraging these kind of special events. The line-up offered for 1996 is highly credible both from an operational standpoint (all proven event management organizations) and from an event standpoint. As it has been for the past decade, the City remains one of the top venues in the country for large-scale beach events. With this season's offerings, 1996 should be yet another banner year for Hermosa Beach. Fiscal Impact: $124,815 Fees paid to General Fund. $ 3,254 to the DEC Fund. Total* $128,069 *Total includes IMG International Tournament and Triathlon to be reviewed at the April 9, 1996 Council Meeting. Attachments: A: Table/Calendar B. Site Plans/Contracts Respectfully Submitted, Mary I . C :. ey Co unity Resources Director Concur: Itt44.00.- Stephen R. B Val Straser City Manager Chief of Police 1 WPVA/CE SPORTS/AVP VIP / PLAYERS / STAFF PARKING 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS WPVA: MAY 3-5 11Th STREET SOUTH SIDE BETWEEN BEACH DRIVE AND HERMOSA AVE. FRIDAY, SATURDAY, SUNDAY, MAY 3, 4 & 5 13TH STREET NORTH SIDE, BETWEEN BEACH DRIVE AND JUST PAST ALLRIGHT SATURDAY, SUNDAY, MAY 4, & 5 CE SPORTS - AUGUST 16-18 11TH STREET SOUTH SIDE BETWEEN BEACH DRIVE AND HERMOSA AVE. FRIDAY, SATURDAY, SUNDAY AUGUST 16, 17 & 18 13TH STREET NORTH SIDE BETWEEN BEACH DRIVE JUST PAST ALLRIGHT SATURDAY, SUNDAY AUGUST 17 & 18 AVP - AUGUST 23-25 11TH STREET FRIDAY, AUGUST 23 NORTH SIDE NEXT TO ALLRIGHT PARKING LOT 11TH STREET SOUTH SIDE FRIDAY, AUGUST 23 (DO NOT USE METERS IN FRONT OF BUSINESSES) 13TH STREET SATURDAY AUGUST 24 & SUNDAY, AUGUST 25 NORTH SIDE NEXT TO LARGE ALLRIGHT PARKING LOT 13TH STREET SATURDAY, AUGUST 24 & SUNDAY, AUGUST 25 SOUTH SIDE NEXT TO SMALL ALLRIGHT PARKING LOT TOTAL SPACES PER DAY 22 16 22 16 25 22 27 19 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ATTACHMENT A 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS TABLE AND CALENDAR OF EVENTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS APPLICANT WPVA IMG AAU EVENT PRO- DUCTIONS, INC.' CE SPORTS AVP SPIKE -IT -UP MESP EVENT/ YEAR WOMEN'S PRO 8TH YEAR INTERNA- TIONAL VB 2ND YEAR JUNIOR HB OPEN 2ND YEAR AMATEUR VB TRNY & CONCERT NEW EVENT 4 -MAN AND 4 -WOMAN PRO 5TH YEAR HB CHAMPION- SHIPS 10TH YEAR VB TOURNEY NEW EVENT SPRINT TRIATHLON 5TH YEAR EVENT DATES MAY 3-5, 1996 JUNE 18-23, 1996 JULY 17, 1996 JULY 20-21, 1996 AUG 16-18, 1996 AUG 23-25, 1996 SEPT 7-8, 1996 OCT 13, 1996 SET-UP MAY 1-2 JUNE 6-17 NONE JULY 19 AUG 14-15 AUG 19-22 SEPT. 5-6 OCT. 12 TEAR -DOWN MAY 6 JUNE 24-30 NONE JULY 22 AUG 19 AUG 26-27 SEPT. 8 NONE EVENT CATEGORY CATEGORY II CATEGORY III NON- PROFIT CATEGORY II AND IV CATEGORY II CATEGORY III CATEGORY II CATEGORY II REQUESTING ADMISSION CHARGES? NO NO NO NO NO YES: $4,000 MIN. OR 25% GROSS -CITY NO NO SHUTTLE BUS SERVICE? NO YES NO NO NO YES NO NO INSURANCE $2 MILLION $2 MILLION $1 MILLION $2 MILLION $2 MILLION $2 MILLION $2 MILLION $2 MILLION FILMING YES YES NO YES YES YES YES NO SEASON OFF SEASON SUMMER SUMMER SUMMER SUMMER SUMMER OFF- SEASON OFF-SEASON FEES (EST.): PERMIT SET-UP POLICE (TBD) FIRE/PM(TBD) CR STAFF ADMISSION FILM PERMIT BUSINESS LIC BANNER CO-SPONSOR METERS AMP. PERMIT TOTAL $5,369 $600 $4,302 $1,392 $600 NA $1,084 $233 $201 $500 $2,046 $38 $16,365 $19,524 $3800 $6,574 $2,784 $1,200 NA $1,084 $233 $201 $500 $2,480 $38 $38,418 $110 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA $38 $148 $5,044 $400 $2,211 $928 $400 NA $1,084 $233 $201 $500 $1,240 $38 $12,279 $5,044 $600 $4,302 $1,392 $600 NA $1,084 $233 $201 $500 $1,860 $38 $15,854 $9,762 $1,400 $5,140 $1,392 • $600 $4,000 + $1,843 $233 $201 $1,500 $1,643 $38 $27,752 $3,579 $400 $1,912 $928 $400 NA $1,084 $233 $201 $500 $1,240 $38 $10,515 $1,790 $200 $2,151 $464 $200 NA NA NA NA $500 $1,395 $38 $6,738 Revised 3/4/96 Attachment A May 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS Tuesday Wednesday Thursday 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 azi 6 WPVA TEAR - DOWN 13 20 7 27 14 21 8 15 28 9 22 29 23 Friday Saturday 4 Sunday into de Mayo VA - rOMEMS;:' 10 30 17 24 11 31 other's Day 19 June MTWTF SS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 City of Hermosa Beach 2/14/96 June 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday r _r..._tines!'br,.�i'!..s..^}_.54:?2b'��N1r'ijr.;61u3"r't�,M1'i:m'�ai3�'w.t 7 I c',., . ,. r ,'„, ',',.1'4:„.17,,,„:,;!-,•,..- •„!,,,,,,-,:•I':.,'...- :',",: 7 t; :;;;t ; R',c, ir6aii,.t ,r,• I t4n ... _ .. _. May MTWTFSS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 • July MTWTFSS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3 4 11 5 12 7 1 8 2 9 IMG WORLD BEACH EVENT SET-UP 13 14 lag Day 15 16 ather's Day IMG WORLD BEACH EVENT SET-UP 17 PMG WORLD .,.` 24 G TEAR - DOWN 18 19 20 Summer begins 21 22 INTERNATIONAL TOURNEY 25 11 G TEAR - DOWN 26 G TEAR - DOWN 27 G TEAR - DOWN 28 11 G TEAR - DOWN 29 1 G TEAR - DOWN 30 11 G TEAR - DOWN City of Hermosa Beach 2/14/96 July 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS Monday t It 114th ,,.Iltl'it'f., 1 .. lu J, tM-:9.:u' .11:.aJJ�—:.. ! 41 ."f!1.. �.. h . � :! r.. ,'.,.!I Tuesday Wednesday Thursday 1 8 2 3 9 15 4 Independence Day 10 16 22 TEAR -DOWN 17 23 29 11 0,0.0�l!!i!0:41i'h141',.!4441nxW�:h'.IM1.7.`iNu.,1.!ywL�h.. Friday Saturday Sunday 5 18 24 30 12 19 SET-UP 25 31 13 20 26 14 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 City of Hermosa Beach 2/14/96 August 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS Monday July .. Tuesday MTWTF SS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 5 12 19 CE SPORTS TEAR -DOWN i,° 6'• F1;.. Wednesday September MTWT F SS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 6 7 13 20 Thursday 1 8 Friday Saturday 3 9 10 11 16 17 18 CE SPORTS SET-UP L P€QRTS :.:4TERS4 24 . Ci3,0030NSHIpS 21 AVP SET-UP 26 • VP TEAR - DOWN 27 • VP TEAR - DOWN 28 29 30 31 City of Hermosa Beach 2/14/96 September 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 16 3 10 23 Yom Kippur 17 30 4 11 18 24 6 SPIKE SET-UP 12 25 19 13 26 20 14 osh Hashanah 27 21 15 22 utumn begins CITY TOURNEY August MTWTF SS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 October MTWTFSS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 City of Hermosa Beach 2/14/96 October 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS Monday 4 les ;!p 7 VIt 14 Columbus Day (Observed) Tuesday Wednesday 1 8 21 ;.I 15 28 2 9 22 16 Thursday 3 10 23 29 17 Friday Saturday 24 30 11 18 5 25 12 SET-UP 1 19 Sunday 6 13 26 20 27 Daylight Savings -- set back 1 hour September MTWT F SS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 November MTWTF SS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 City of Hermosa Beach 2/14/96 ATTACHMENT B SITE PLAN AND CONTRACT WPVA - WOMEN'S PRO VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT MAY 3-5, 1996 TITLE SPONSOR EVIAN The format for the Women's Pro Tournament consists of a 32 team double elimination contest with qualifying starting on Friday (May 3) at 8:00 a.m. and tournament play beginning approximately at noon. They will utilize five (5) courts on the north side of the Pier. The finals will be televised live on Sunday. PACF ' OCEAN THE HERMOSA BEACH PIER EVIAN' WPVA TOUR MAY 3-5,199€ LIVE ON ABC TELEVISION HERMOSA BEACH CA PER AVENUE TOUR TRUCKS (2) AND . TELEVISION (2) TRUCK 1 BEACH ALOE 85 PARKING EMERGENCY ACCESS r PLAYER VIP SEATING 20120 e« - i Ws ,-e O O VIP SEATING 20x20 0 O e« Platlam VIP FOOD 20K20Orr Platform PACFIC OCEAN PACFIC OCEAN PACFIC OCEAN PACFIC OCEAN PACFIC OCEAN PACFIC OCEAN 947 x 10 -ROW ELEVATED BLEACHERS 10124 [II Tin THROUGHWAY • KIR CLEAR VP: Spon 1 8 7 8 a VIP: Sporn 4 12u7CZ,W;: Du20,u BATHROOM TO BE MOVED TO THE SOUTH OF THE PIER 2 VIP: Tour A 3-41 3 4 5 6 — Snow Fencing Repo Fencing O SacuAry/Aocaaa Control . Access b Restricted Arae • Portable Toilet Rev. 2/14/96 3 xm 7 1 8 tr MAWR AA COURT 3 10110 VEIL NQISAMPLIMO TENTI . 2 Sp�onwrrA a 5 Sponsor sE 3 Sponsor B 7 Sponsor F 4 Sponsor C II Sponsor O THE HERMOSA BEACH STRAND 1 WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on March 12, 1996, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between Women's Professional Volleyball Association (WPVA), a Sporting Events Promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to the WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT ON MAY 3-5, 1996. FEES Event fee shall be $5,369 plus set up/tear down fee of $200 per day. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of WPVA. WPVA shall provide no Tess than six security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Officers for the event as follows for each day of Tournament from 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM: 1 Sergeant and 2 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by the Chief of Police. The CITY shall provide two (2) Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. Cost of officers and fire/paramedic personnel shall be assumed by WPVA . CLEAN -UP WPVA shall use a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street. Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue. The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament. WPVA shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: Beach (impacted area) Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. WPVA shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 30 yard roll -off on 13th Street at Beach and six (6) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side or as determined necessary by City staff. WPVA shall take the necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. WPVA shall make arrangements to provide such bins. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES WPVA shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If WPVA desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by WPVA. INSURANCE WPVA shall, not later than ten (10) days prior to the event, provide the City a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles, their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with minimum coverage ofj million combined single limit coverage. Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 days notice in writing to the City and County. WPVA insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. WPVA agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of WPVA its agents, officers and employees, including but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include all areas occupied or affected by the event. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY's alcohol ordinance shall be required by WPVA. City staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of WPVA. CITY shall permit WPVA to display two large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. WPVA shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY's alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by WPVA to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of the WPVA. PARKING WPVA shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs 48 hours in advance of event and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. WPVA shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. WPVA shall be required to make announcements indicating 1) where there is free parking; and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. WPVA will be allowed to park one "working" truck on the pier head. No other vehicles shall be parked on pier, pier head or Strand without permission of CITY. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may WPVA block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. In order to encourage beach events to grow to include a presence in the downtown area, the City welcomes event operators to use the Pier Avenue median (west of Hermosa Avenue to the Strand) for sponsor displays, special events, information, and other promotional purposes. Hermosa Beach merchants will be allowed to display wares and sell food and/or provide outdoor dining in front of their stores. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RIGHTS/RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY reserves the right to use the stadium for civic or recreational events or activities. The CITY shall allow WPVA the opportunity to sell official WPVA concession items per certain conditions. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS WPVA RESPONSIBILITIES WPVA shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by City staff. WPVA shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. WPVA shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and necessary personnel for conducting said Tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. WPVA shall set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on scheduled days. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date Approved as to form: City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION Director of Operations Date City Clerk Date ATTACHMENT B SITE PLAN AND CONTRACT EVENT PRODUCTIONS AMATEUR VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT/CONCERT JULY 20-21, 1996 TITLE SPONSOR JOSE CUERVO This is an amateur beach volleyball tourney presented by Rolling Stone Magazine. During the previous four weeks, they will be hosting amateur beach volleyball events in Manhattan, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz and San Diego. The event in Hermosa will be an invitational championship to which four teams (top two women's and top two men's) from each of the previous events (16 teams total) will be invited to compete for the State Championship. The event will utilize two center courts and will begin at 9:00 a.m. On Saturday evening there will be a free concert. .1 he Strand Center Court Area (see detail dwg.) Five Sponsor's tents (10' x 10') to be located on Pier to eaec, Ja,n a0°01 r Tw W ondory sponsor's (p' x 10) Five tents TOP VIEW Cuero Bottle SponsorMP Tent 00 x 20') 10' x 20' Stoge w/ Canopy Tent 90' 0 Ployer Services Tent (10' x 20) 4 Center `Court sax& a0 U 0 GLooking towards Pier Tocol Center Court Footprint is opproxirnotety 90 x 150' Sponsor's E VIEW OF STAGE FROM STRAND JOSE CUERVO Beach Volleyball California Championships Presented by Rolling Stone Magazine July 20 & 21, 1996 JOSE CUERVO Beach Volleyball California Championships Presented by Rolling Stone Magazine July 20 & 21, 1996 Men s Open 8 A Courts Note Court layout os shown is based on mops of the beach front that ore ovolloble to us of this time. We anticipate that court Ioyout writ vont' somewhat to accormhodote publk access paths. emergency access needs. and surface vocations of the beads that ore constontfy changing due to weather and usage patterns. Women's Open Courts EVENT PRODUCTIONS, INC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on March 12, 1996, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between EVENT PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Sporting Events Promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to the JOSE CUERVO AMATEUR BEACH VOLLEYBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS ON JULY 20-21, 1996 AND CONCERT ON JULY 20, 1996. FEES EVENT PRODUCTIONS fee shall be $5,044 plus set up fee of $200 per day. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. CONCERT EVENT LOCATION AND HOURS OF OPERATION Concert will be held on the north side of the Hermosa Beach Pier just north of center court from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of EVENT PRODUCTIONS. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall provide no less than six security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the CITY's alcohol ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Officers for EVENT PRODUCTIONS as follows for each day of Tournament, 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. 1 Officer or as many officers as deemed necessary by the Chief of Police; and for the Concert, 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.: 1 Sergeant and 6 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by the Chief of Police. The CITY shall provide two (2) Fire/Paramedic personnel for EVENT PRODUCTIONS or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. Cost of officers and fire/paramedic personnel shall be assumed by EVENT PRODUCTIONS. CLEAN -UP EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall use a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament/Concert: The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street. Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue. The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament/Concert. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: Beach (impacted area) Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall take the necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall make arrangements to provide such bins. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 30 yard roll -off on 13th Street at Beach and six (6) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side or as determined necessary by City staff. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If EVENT PRODUCTIONS desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by EVENT PRODUCTIONS. INSURANCE EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall, not later than ten (10) days prior to the event, provide the City a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles, their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 days notice in writing to the City and County. EVENT PRODUCTIONS insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. Said insurance's shall not be canceled or terminated without at least ten (10) days written notice to the City. EVENT PRODUCTIONS agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of EVENT PRODUCTIONS its agents, officers and employees, including but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include any and all areas occupied or affected by the event. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to the event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY's alcohol ordinance shall be required by EVENT PRODUCTIONS. City staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of EVENT PRODUCTIONS. CITY shall permit EVENT PRODUCTIONS to display two large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY's alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by EVENT PRODUCTIONS to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of EVENT PRODUCTIONS. PARKING EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs 48 hours in advance of event and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall be required to make announcements indicating 1) where there is free parking; and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. EVENT PRODUCTIONS will be allowed to park one "working" truck on the pier head. No other vehicles shall be parked on pier, pier head or Strand without permission of CITY. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may EVENT PRODUCTIONS block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. SPECIAL EVENT PRODUCTIONS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. In order to encourage beach events to grow to include a presence in the downtown area, the City welcomes event operators to use the Pier Avenue median (west of Hermosa Avenue to the Strand) for sponsor displays, special events, information, and other promotional purposes. Hermosa Beach merchants will be allowed to display wares and sell food and/or provide outdoor dining in front of their stores. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RIGHTS/RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY reserves the right to use the stadium for civic or recreational events or activities. The CITY shall allow EVENT PRODUCTIONS the opportunity to sell official EVENT PRODUCTIONS concession items per certain conditions. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS EVENT PRODUCTIONS RESPONSIBILITIES EVENT PRODUCTIONS will be solely responsible for event management. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by City staff. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and necessary personnel for conducting said Tournament. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall only set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on scheduled days. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall set up the concert stage on the sand on the north side of center court. Location subject to CITY approval. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall remove all stage, sound and lighting equipment on the evening of the concert. Anything that cannot be removed that night will be secured and removed by Sunday. EVENT PRODUCTIONS shall obtain an amplification permit from the CITY. EVENT PRODUCTIONS will abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by the CITY. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date EVENT PRODUCTIONS Director of Operations Date City Clerk Date ATTACHMENT B SITE PLAN AND CONTRACT CE SPORTS - 4 -MAN AND 4 -WOMAN PRO VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT AUGUST 16-18, 1996 TITLE SPONSOR BUD LIGHT The format is a round-robin tournament featuring professional four - person teams. The season schedule features 13 events: 11 combined Men's and Women's tournaments (like Hermosa's), one Men's tournament and one Women's tournament. This event will be televised on ESPN. KEY l'gm2=11. Access to restricted area Snow fencing Rope fencing O Secu ri ty/Ac c ess control S N E 0 0 0 0 To Pier Ave. BUD LIGHT PRO BEACH VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE 1996 HERMOSA BEACH SITE LAYOUT 15 -ROW ELEVATED BLEACHERS 90 x 40 4THROUGHWAY • KEEP CLEAR COURTSIDE SEATING -2 ROWS ItA tint R COURTSIDE SEATING -2 to 3 ROWS • 2 • SAND AREA 98 x 56 COURT 59-6 x 29-6 N: 'R COURTSIDE SEATING 3 ROWS TEAM BOX 24x 10 I 1 2 4c) TV 10 x 10 • 6," t' ut 0 lt tt mtes COURTSIDE SEATING 3 ROWS 7 THROUGHWAY KEEP CLEAR 5 -ROW BLEACHERS 40x 10 V.I.P TENT 40 x 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 TV 10 x 10 5 -ROW BLEACHERS 40 x 10 CATWALK SCOREBOARD 35 x 5 1 1 FOOD SERVICE 1 1 —1 3 0 0- 3 0 -E SPIKE ZONE 3 th 1 0 0 0 0 • • . The Strand The Strand M i i CE SPORTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on March 12, 1996, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between CE SPORTS, a Sporting Events Promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to the 4 -MAN AND 4 -WOMAN PRO VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT ON AUGUST 16-18, 1996. FEES Event fee shall be $5,044 plus set up/tear down fee of $200 per day. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of CE Sports. CE Sports shall provide no less than six security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Officers for CE Sports as follows for each day of Tournament, from 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.: 1 Sergeant and 2 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by the Chief of Police. The CITY shall provide two (2) Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. Cost of officers and fire/paramedic personnel shall be assumed by CE Sports . CLEAN -UP CE Sports shall use a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street. Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue. The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament. CE Sports shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: Beach (impacted area) Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. CE Sports shall take the necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. CE Sports shall make arrangements to provide such bins. CE Sports shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 30 yard roll -off on 13th Street at Beach and six (6) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side or as determined necessary by City staff. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES CE Sports shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If CE Sports desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by CE Sports. INSURANCE CE Sports shall, not later than ten (10) days prior to the event, provide the City a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles, their officer, employees and agents as additional insured with minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 days notice in writing to the City and County. CE Sports insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. CE Sports agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of CE Sports its agents, officers and employees, including but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. For Insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to any and all areas occupied or affected by the event. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY's alcohol ordinance shall be required by CE Sports. City staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of CE Sports. CITY shall permit CE Sports to display two large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. CE Sports shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY's alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by CE Sports to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of CE Sports. PARKING CE Sports shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs 48 hours in advance of event and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. CE Sports shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. CE Sports shall be required to make announcements indicating 1) where there is free parking; and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. CE Sports will be allowed to park one "working" truck on the pier head. No other vehicles shall be parked on pier, pier head or Strand without permission of CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. In order to encourage beach events to grow to include a presence in the downtown area, the City welcomes event operators to use the Pier Avenue median (west of Hermosa Avenue to the Strand) for sponsor displays, special events, information, and other promotional purposes. Hermosa Beach merchants will be allowed to display wares and sell food and/or provide outdoor dining in front of their stores. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RIGHTS/RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY reserves the right to use the stadium for civic or recreational events or activities. The CITY shall allow CE Sports the opportunity to sell official CE Sports concession items per certain conditions. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS CE SPORTS RESPONSIBILITIES CE Sports shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by City staff. CE Sports shall use the same bleacher company and/or share a stadium set-up with the AVP. CE Sports shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. CE Sports shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and necessary personnel for conducting said Tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. CE Sports shall only set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on scheduled days. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date City Attorney DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Date Director Date CE SPORTS Director of Operations Date City Clerk Date J¢ ATTACHMENT B SITE PLAN AND CONTRACT AVP - HERMOSA BEACH VOLLEYBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS AUGUST 23-25, 1996 TITLE SPONSOR MILLER LITE This will be the tenth year that Hermosa Beach has hosted the 2 -man pro volleyball championships. Play begins on Friday (August 23 ) at approximately 9:00 a.m. and continues through Saturday with the finals televised live on NBC on Sunday. The event concludes with an awards ceremony. for Vr•t• r vim• • 46.4c-'�� ' 61 -re chAP 57. 51 Tu ra --- `5 57 • !o t3L.�'144,,VZ0C la Pi -Al. C31-Ze • S s'on so.0 - r ji rE r4 . 98I92LE6 01 �T�•4�1,D ASP TOUR TRUCKS ON SITE for HERMOSA BEACH TOUR SEMI -TRUCKS Ip MEASUREMENTS 1. Lite/Lite Cup a. Semi -Tractor 10' x 48' 10' x 27' 2. Lite/Lite Cup 10' x 48' b. Semi -Tractor 10' x 27" 3. Lite/Lite Cup 10' x 75' 4. Concession Trailer w/canopie 10' x 35' b. Concession Pickup 10' x 20' 5. Support Pickup 10' x 20' TV PRODUCTION COMPOUND ID MEASUREMENTS 6. Mobile Unit 10' x 48'‘ 7. Satellite Unit 10' x 30' (approx) 8. Office Trailer 10' x 35' (approx) 9. Generator Trailer 10' x 48' MISCELLANEOUS 10. Port -A -Potties 11. Ice Trailer 12. Radio Station o /l dAV '4 'N.)8 'HO .117a Irr 1 ASSOCIATION OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT 1 This contract is entered into on March 12, 1996, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between the ASSOCIATION OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS (AVP) and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to the Association of Volleyball Professionals' Men's U. S. A. Championships on August 23, 24, and 25, 1996. FEES Event fee shall be $9,762 plus set up/tear down fee of $200 per day. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the CITY. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the CITY. ADMISSION FEES The City of Hermosa Beach will be provided with a fee scale chart two weeks prior to the Tournament. AVP agrees to pay the City of Hermosa Beach $4,000 or 25% of the gross admission revenue, whichever is greater. The AVP agrees to furnish records and make payment of $4,000 to the City of Hermosa Beach two weeks prior to the Tournament and make additional payments, if applicable within two weeks after the tournament. AVP may charge admission for up to 25 percent of stadium seating. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to audit any and all financial records of the AVP specific to priority seating for the Tournament. The City of Hermosa Beach will receive a final copy of the toumament revenue and expenditures in regards to priority seating ticket sales within seven (7) days of the end of the tournament. SECURITY The CITY of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of AVP. AVP shall provide no less than ten security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. 1 The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the CITY'S alcohol ordinance. The CITY of Hermosa Beach shall provide officers for the event as follows: On Friday and Saturday 1 Sergeant and 2 Officers and on Sunday 1 Sergeant and 4 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by Chief of Police; The CITY shall provide two (2) Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. Cost of officers and fire/paramedic personnel shall be assumed by AVP. CLEAN-UP AVP shall use a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: • The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street • Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the CITY each day of the Tournament. AVP shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: • Beach (impacted area) • Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. AVP shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 30 yard roll -off on 13th Street at Beach and six (6) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side or as determined necessary by CITY staff. AVP shall take necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. AVP shall make arrangements for such bins. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES AVP shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If AVP desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by AVP. INSURANCE Ten (10) days prior to the event, AVP shall provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. AVP insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to 2 contribute. Said insurance's shall not be canceled or terminated without at least ten (10) days written notice to the CITY. AVP agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of AVP its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include any and all areas occupied or affected by the event. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required by AVP. CITY staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for postings. CITY shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of AVP. CITY shall permit AVP to display three large replicas of their product. CITY staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. AVP shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY's alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by AVP to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of AVP. PARKING AVP shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs 48 hours in advance of event and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. AVP shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. AVP shall be required to make announcements indicating: 1) where there is free parking; and, 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. AVP shall provide a shuttle bus service from a major satellite point(s) on the outskirts of or outside of Hermosa Beach. AVP shall provide directional signs and advertisement which shall be approved in advance by the CITY. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand, for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may AVP block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. 3 In order to encourage beach events to grow to include a presence in the downtown area, the City welcomes event operators to use the Pier Avenue median (west of Hermosa Avenue to the Strand) for sponsor displays, special events, information, and other promotional purposes. Hermosa Beach merchants will be allowed to display wares and sell food and/or provide outdoor dining in front of their stores. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RIGHTS/RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY reserves the right to use the stadium for civic or recreational events or activities. The CITY shall allow AVP the opportunity to sell official AVP tournament concession items pursuant to certain conditions: • No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted; and, • All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS AVP RESPONSIBILITIES AVP shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by City staff. AVP shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. AVP shall maintain public access openings on the Strand Wall (Pier). AVP shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such a Tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with CITY of Hermosa Beach Noise,Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Department of Community Resources. AVP shall set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on scheduled days. At the CITY'S option, AVP is required to display and permit CITY representatives to present a perpetual trophy to Tournament winners following the finals. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAYOR Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Date 4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR Date ASSOC. OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS Date ATTEST: CITY CLERK Date 5 ATTACHMENT B SITE PLAN AND CONTRACT SPIKE -IT -UP VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT SEPTEMBER 7-8, 1996 TITLE SPONSORS GATORADE AT&T KODAK POWER CENTERLINE SPORTS This is an amateur volleyball tournament open to local players and will consist of the following divisions: AAA (open men and women) A, B (un- rated), Recreational and Junior. There will be pool play on Saturday and conclude on Sunday with a single elimination tournament. 13103724333 CBVA/RECREACTION 0 LL CL U) N 03-06-1996 4 • *,ori Iw 1 l ,e0. • h•• ry• .../Z.• O N• n• /«. .,• 11* J 1=. D 3 C:3 M. n.• f1• 11• 1.1 • • 41n4.7 Paws►tt1aj. l Cn O Com. S C C 11 O C] C3 i 1 ICS • L J L E;) C�cJC7CD flCDEJI=CDC D 1' CD =1 1=1• O r-1 CI • C] CD O C3 - - -. ..n1 • SWAMrr- ',;.. �' �...•JLC• )41 V� '1• r •Y• n.• ni• 1• • i (c9 47r-eratzittd mos, 14: TOTAL P.02 SPIKE -IT -UP VENTURE L.P. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on March 12, 1996, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between SPIKE - IT -UP -VENTURE, L.P., a Sporting Events Promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to a VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT ON SEPTEMBER 7 AND 8, 1996. FEES Event fee shall be $3,579 plus set up/tear down fee of $200 per day. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of Spike -It -Up Venture. Spike -It -Up Venture shall provide no less than six security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Officers for Spike -It -Up Venture for each day of Tournament, from 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.: 1 Sergeant and 2 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by the Chief of Police. The CITY shall provide two (2) Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. Cost of officers and fire/paramedic personnel shall be assumed by Spike -It -Up Venture . CLEAN -UP Spike -It -Up Venture shall use a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street. Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue. The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament. Spike -It -Up Venture shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: Beach (impacted area) Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. Spike -It -Up Venture shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 30 yard roll -off on 13th Street at Beach and six (6) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side or as determined necessary by City staff. Spike -It -Up Venture shall take the necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. Spike -It -Up Venture shall make arrangements to provide such bins. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES Spike -It -Up Venture shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If Spike -It -Up Venture desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by Spike -It -Up Venture. INSURANCE Spike -It -Up Venture shall, not later than ten (10) days prior to the event, provide the City a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles, their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 days notice in writing to the City and County. Spike -It -Up Venture insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. Spike -It -Up Venture agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of Spike -It -Up Venture its agents, officers and employees, including but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include all areas occupied or affected by the event. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY's alcohol ordinance shall be required by Spike -It -Up Venture. City staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of Spike -It -Up Venture. CITY shall permit Spike -It -Up Venture to display two large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. Spike -It -Up Venture shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY's alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by Spike -It -Up Venture to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of Spike -It -Up Venture. PARKING Spike -It -Up Venture shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs 48 hours in advance of event and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. Spike -It -Up -Venture shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. Spike -It -Up Venture shall be required to make announcements indicating 1) where there is free parking; and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. Spike -It -Up Venture will be allowed to park one "working" truck on the pier head. No other vehicles shall be parked on pier, pier head pr Strand without permission of CITY. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may Spike -It -Up Venture block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. In order to encourage beach events to grow to include a presence in the downtown area, the City welcomes event operators to use the Pier Avenue median (west of Hermosa Avenue to the Strand) for sponsor displays, special events, information, and other promotional purposes. Hermosa Beach merchants will be allowed to display wares and sell food and/or provide outdoor dining in front of their stores. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RIGHTS/RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall allow Spike -It -Up Venture the opportunity to sell official Spike -It -Up Venture concession items per certain conditions. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS SPIKE -IT -UP VENTURE RESPONSIBILITIES Spike -It -Up Venture shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by City staff. Spike -It -Up Venture shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. Spike -It -Up Venture shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and necessary personnel for conducting said Tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. Spike -It -Up Venture shall only set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on scheduled days. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date SPIKE -IT -UP VENTURE, L. P. Director of Operations Date City Clerk Date 1 -9-40-4�I.Ot/�t ® e�-d v 1/0/1 (M) 03-12-9'; March 4, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council Subject: Downtown Circulation & Parking Study March 12, 1996 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Receive and File the Study 2. Direct Staff to Proceed with Processing the Downtown Implementation Plan and Amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan 3. Direct Staff to Extend Hours of Enforcement for Preferential Parking Program Between 8th and 14th on Manhattan Avenue and Meet with Residents on Proposed Program Changes Background: The City commissioned a parking and circulation study from Korve Engineers and Walker Parking Consultants to assess the impacts of future downtown development and implementation of the Downtown Improvement Plan. Over the last three months, the consultant team met with City staff and community groups including downtown merchants and property owners and the Chamber of Commerce. Draft recommendations were prepared and reviewed by various City departments including Community Development, Police, Fire, Finance, Public Works and Community Resources. The final draft document reflects the intradepartmental review. The Downtown Circulation and Parking Study provides circulation and parking management recommendations to implement the Downtown Improvement Plan. The Study provides: • Traffic recommendations • Parking recommendations • Quantification of traffic impacts of future downtown development • Assessment of Downtown Improvement Plan alternatives 1. Analysis: Traffic and Circulation The Study assesses existing and future development conditions (year 2000) in the Downtown utilizing new traffic counts and the traffic model "TRAFFIX" to determine Levels of Service (LOS) and Volume Capacity (VC) for the following major intersections: Stop Controlled Signalized Signals Added Pier/Ardmore Pier/Hermosa Pier/Ardmore Pier/Valley Pier/Beach l lth/Hermosa Pier Valley Pier/Monterey 13th/Hermosa Pier Manhattan (east)(west) 14th/ Hermosa Beach/11th, 13th & 14th The Level of Service at each of these intersections has been examined withstand without anticipated development for each of the Downtown Improvement Plan altdnatives: • Lower Pier Avenue One -Way • Lower Pier Avenue One -Way and Lane Reduction on Upper Pier Avenue • Lower Pier Avenue Closed and Lane Reduction on Upper Pier Avenue (Please see Circulation Study -Figure 3.2 & Appendix for location / scope of development.) Overall, the proposed lane reductions and one-way conditions proposed with the Downtown Improvement Plan will have minimal impact upon traffic circulation. The trip generation model quantified the Level of Service (delay) for each of the above intersections and all will operate acceptably well at LOS "D" or above during peak period conditions. The LOS and VC ratios are contained in Tables 1.1, 2.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 in the attached Study. Peak periods were identified as Saturday 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM and Thursday 4:00 pm To 6:00 pm (non -summer). These peak demand periods reflect the most generalized conditions of the year, rather than the most extreme conditions generated with special beach events or summer beach traffic. LOS D is considered an acceptable level of service in that traffic queues may develop but dissipate rapidly without excessive delays. 2. Analysis: Parking and Parking Management Parking Supply & Demand Parking demand was quantified based upon existing conditions and future development scenarios utilized in the traffic generation model. Anticipated downtown development was identified by staff and compared with the parking supply downtown with and without a proposed parking structure at Lot "C". The demand for parking both on -street and off- street was examined relative to retail patron and employees during peak periods. Tables 7 and 8 of the Parking Study indicate that: • there is currently adequate supply for employee parking during the peak periods of the day, but that there is not enough effective on -street supply for patrons vying for convenient on -street spaces during this period (1256 total demand -1259 total supply and 878 patron demand - 801 off-street supply) • there is currently inadequate supply for employee and patron parking during peak weekend periods (1754 total demand -1259 total supply or net deficit of 493) • there is a projected parking supply deficit (459 spaces) based upon projected parking demand with future downtown development • there is a deficit of 2111 parking spaces for existing peak demand and future demand (1752 spaces existing peak demand + 459 spaces future demand) The Study indicates that at peak periods (Saturday 9:00 PM) without factoring in future development, there is currently a parking deficit of 493 spaces which must be supplied at new off-street parking lot locations or in a new parking structure on City owned property. 2 Pricing Pricing is recommended as tool to influence parking demand and minimize intrusion into adjacent residential areas. The Study suggest increasing on-street meter rates and decreasing the fee structure for all off-street parking as follows: Table 5 First 2 Hrs. 3rd/4th Hrs. 5th/6th Hrs. Maximum Total $1.00/Hr. $1.00/Hr. $.75/Hr. $6.00 Cumulative $2.00 $4.00 $5.50 $6.00 Off-street meter rates would be lowered relative to on -street rates in order to encourage retail patrons and beach -goers to use the lots and/or proposed parking structure and parking enforcement would be increased commensurate with revisions to the City's Preferential Parking Program in order to minimize commercial parking in residential areas. Parking Administration The study provides a recommendation to reorganize parking control as a new department or new division contained within an existing department with the intent of centralizing administration of parking control and enforcement. Currently these activities are spread between Finance, Police and to some extent the Public Works Departments. Through the issues of centralized parking management are not fully resolved, it is clear that on overall parking strategy, centrally coordinated and managed would be beneficial and result in better service than is now provided with a decentralized system. Special Event Parking, Deliveries & Emergency Access The Study provides recommendations to deal with truck delivery zones on 12th and 13th Courts. These areas can be striped and signed to require that they are used exclusively for deliveries. Similarly, the areas around Lots A and C can be redesigned (in connection with proposed parking structures) to accommodate large truck deliveries at specified hours, the turning radius for emergency vehicles and to accommodate special event trailer parking for special beach events. The key to eliminating truck delivery parking along Pier Avenue will be to ensure that truck parking is adequately supplied as proposed and that truck delivery regulations are enforced. Conclusions: The Study proposes an overall parking strategy based upon increasing parking supply, and pricing and parking enforcement. The current parking supply deficit of 493 spaces would be offset with a new 400-500 car parking structure. Metered on -street parking would be priced higher than parking lot/structure spaces to encourage off-street parking. Commercial parking intrusion into residential areas would be discouraged with expansion of the Preferential Parking Program and increased parking citation fines and expanded parking enforcement. As a result of pricing, long term parkers would tend to use public lots as opposed to on -street metered spaces which would benefit businesses and residents. This document is intended to serve as the technical report for environmental review of future downtown projects and the Downtown Improvement Plan. It will enable the City to complete processing the Downtown Improvement Plan through the Coastal Commission and to proceed with required amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan. With the quantified future parking and traffic demand provided in the Study, the City has more full understanding of the expected traffic and parking and circulation impacts of anticipated future development and can mitigate these impacts as required. Sol Blume n4'eld,'Director Community Development Department Conc Stephe f . Burrell, City M. nager Attachments: Downtown Circulation & Parking Study BACKGROUND MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT THE HERMOSA BEACH LIBRARY, POLICE DEPARTMENT, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION, AND CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. Honorable Mayor and Members March 4, 1996 Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 12, 1996 Subject: Downtown Circulation & Parking Study Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Receive and File the Study 2. Direct Staff to Proceed with Processing the Downtown Implementation Plan and Amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan 3. Direct Staff to Extend Hours of Enforcement for Preferential Parking Program Between 8th and 14th on Manhattan Avenue and Meet with Residents on Proposed Program Changes Background: The City commissioned a parking and circulation study from Korve Engineers and Walker Parking Consultants to assess the impacts of future downtown development and implementation of the Downtown Improvement Plan. Over the last three months, the consultant team met with City staff and community groups including downtown merchants and property owners and the Chamber of Commerce. Draft recommendations were prepared and reviewed by various City departments including Community Development, Police, Fire, Finance, Public Works and Community Resources. The final draft document reflects the intradepartmental review. The Downtown Circulation and Parking Study provides circulation and parking management recommendations to implement the Downtown Improvement Plan. The Study provides: • Traffic recommendations • Parking recommendations • Quantification of traffic impacts of future downtown development • Assessment of Downtown Improvement Plan alternatives 1. Analysis: Traffic and Circulation The Study assesses existing and future development conditions (year 2000) in the Downtown utilizing new traffic counts and the traffic model "TRAFFIX" to determine Levels of Service (LOS) and Volume Capacity (VC) for the following major intersections: Stop Controlled Signalized Signals Added Pier/Ardmore Pier/Hermosa Pier/Ardmore PierNalley Pier/Beach l lth/Hermosa Pier Valley Pier/Monterey 13th/Hermosa Pier Manhattan (east)(west) 14th/ Hermosa Beach/11th, 13th & 14th .,.ea The Level of Service at each of these intersections has been examined with and without anticipated development for each of the Downtown Improvement Plan alternatives: • Lower Pier Avenue One -Way • Lower Pier Avenue One -Way and Lane Reduction on Upper Pier Avenue • Lower Pier Avenue Closed and Lane Reduction on Upper Pier Avenue (Please see Circulation Study -Figure 3.2 & Appendix for location / scope of development.) Overall, the proposed lane reductions and one-way conditions proposed with the Downtown Improvement Plan will have minimal impact upon traffic circulation. The trip generation model quantified the Level of Service (delay) for each of the above intersections and all will operate acceptably well at LOS "D" or above during peak period conditions. The LOS and VC ratios are contained in Tables 1.1, 2.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 in the attached Study. Peak periods were identified as Saturday 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM and Thursday 4:00 pm To 6:00 pm (non -summer). These peak demand periods reflect the most generalized conditions of the year, rather than the most extreme conditions generated with special beach events or summer beach traffic. LOS D is considered an acceptable level of service in that traffic queues may develop but dissipate rapidly without excessive delays. 2. Analysis: Parking and Parking Management Parking Supply & Demand Parking demand was quantified based upon existing conditions and future development scenarios utilized in the traffic generation model. Anticipated downtown development was identified by staff and compared with the parking supply downtown with and without a proposed parking structure at Lot "C". The demand for parking both on -street and off- street was examined relative to retail patron and employees during peak periods. Tables 7 and 8 of the Parking Study indicate that: • there is currently adequate supply for employee parking during the peak periods of the day, but that there is not enough effective on -street supply for patrons vying for convenient on -street spaces during this period (1256 total demand -1259 total supply and 878 patron demand - 801 off-street supply) • there is currently inadequate supply for employee and patron parking during peak weekend periods (1754 total demand -1259 total supply or net deficit of 493) • there is a projected parking supply deficit (459 spaces) based upon projected parking demand with future downtown development • there is a deficit of 2111 parking spaces for existing peak demand and future demand (1752 spaces existing peak demand + 459 spaces future demand) The Study indicates that at peak periods (Saturday 9:00 PM) without factoring in future development, there is currently a parking deficit of 493 spaces which must be supplied at new off-street parking lot locations or in a new parking structure on City owned property. Z Pricing Pricing is recommended as tool to influence parking demand and minimize intrusion into adjacent residential areas. The Study suggest increasing on -street meter rates and decreasing the fee structure for all off-street parking as follows: Table 5 First 2 Hrs. 3rd/4th Hrs. 5th/6th Hrs. Maximum Total $1.00/Hr. $1.00/Hr. $.75/Hr. $6.00 Cumulative $2.00 $4.00 $5.50 $6.00 Off-street meter rates would be lowered relative to on -street rates in order to encourage retail patrons and beach -goers to use the lots and/or proposed parking structure and parking enforcement would be increased commensurate with revisions to the City's Preferential Parking Program in order to minimize commercial parking in residential areas. Parking Administration The study provides a recommendation to reorganize parking control as a new department or new division contained within an existing department with the intent of centralizing administration of parking control and enforcement. Currently these activities are spread between Finance, Police and to some extent the Public Works Departments. Through the issues of centralized parking management are not fully resolved, it is clear that on overall parking strategy, centrally coordinated and managed would be beneficial and result in better service than is now provided with a decentralized system. Special Event Parking, Deliveries & Emergency Access - The Study provides recommendations to deal with truck delivery zones on 12th and 13th Courts. These areas can be striped and signed to require that they are used exclusively for deliveries. Similarly, the areas around Lots A and C can be redesigned (in connection with proposed parking structures) to accommodate large truck deliveries at specified hours, the turning radius for emergency vehicles and to accommodate special event trailer parking for special beach events. The key to eliminating truck delivery parking along Pier Avenue will be to ensure that truck parking is adequately supplied as proposed and that truck delivery regulations are enforced. Conclusions: The Study proposes an overall parking strategy based upon increasing parking supply, and pricing and parking enforcement. The current parking supply deficit of 493 spaces would be offset with a new 400-500 car parking structure. Metered on -street parking would be priced higher than parking lot/structure spaces to encourage off-street parking. Commercial parking intrusion into residential areas would be discouraged with expansion of the Preferential Parking Program and increased parking citation fines and expanded parking enforcement. As a result of pricing, long term parkers would tend to use public lots as opposed to on -street metered spaces which would benefit businesses and residents. This document is intended to serve as the technical report for environmental review of future downtown projects and the Downtown Improvement Plan. It will enable the City to complete processing the Downtown Improvement Plan through the Coastal Commission and to proceed with required amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan. With the quantified future parking and traffic demand provided in the Study, the City has more full understanding of the expected traffic and parking and circulation impacts of anticipated future development and can mitigate these impacts as required. Sol Blume n4eld,'Director Community Development Department Conc Stephe Burrell, City M. nager Attachments: Downtown Circulation & Parking Study CITY of HERMOSA BEACH Downtown Parking and Control Recommendations REVISED DRAFT REPORT Mar.M11 P4,li1it _ ..._t.iTr..l....?: wa cer Parking Consul tan is/Engineers, Inc. February 19, 1996 Mr. Sol Blumenfeld Director, Community Development City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Parking Consultants/ Engineers, Inc. Re: Hermosa Beach Parking Study, Phase II Walker Project #L1190.00 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: Enclosed please find a draft report of the second phase of our parking study for the City of Hermosa Beach, Downtown Parking and Control Recommendations. This report contains many changes based on comments the City forwarded on 25 January, 1996. The primary areas of recommendations, however, remain the same. We believe the City could significantly improve its parking system by: • forming a City Parking Department, • developing parking system goals, • simplifying and more effectively communicating parking information, and • using pricing strategies to encourage appropriate user groups. In our work with other cities, we have found that these changes can help direct parking resources more effectively. Our financial analysis at the conclusion of this report shows that these changes can be implemented, while maintaining and even benefitting the fiscal health of the parking system. After the City's final review of this second draft, we understand that our final report will be combined with Korve Engineering's work and incorporated into a single report Sincerely, Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers, Inc. /71-t-, /A- /27-71-"0--- hn W. Dorsett Department Head, Studies cc: J. Richard Choate, Walker John Kulpa, Korve S: \ PROJECTS \ L 1 1 90 .04@dilltddircleStreet, Suite 120, Newport Beach, California 92660 -r-1. 171!/1 Z ,/ 1//c/1 C,.... /71/II CCQ !)//1O r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PARKING STUDY Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations Prepared for City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, California Prepared by Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers, Inc. 4000 Birch Street Suite 120 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714)553-1450 FAX (714)553-9419 February 19, 1996 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A city's parking conditions are often one of the first things that visitors notice. According to the supply/demand analysis prepared in Walker's phase I study, there simply is not enough on -street parking in Hermosa Beach to satisfy all the visitors, shoppers and residents seeking close, convenient parking. At many peak hours of the year, there is not enough total on- and off-street parking in the downtown area to accommodate all user groups. Therefore, City officials are faced with the challenge of managing available parking resources effectively to provide quality parking service at a reasonable cost. Whether a city has ample or limited parking, it is important that sound management of its parking system be in place. This report contains recommendations to assist the City in the management of current and future parking resources. In total, there are twelve recommendations falling into five major categories: Organizational Structure • Recommendation 1 - The City should form a Parking Department. We believe that there is sufficient complexity and national visibility of Hermosa Beach to warrant the creation of a parking department. One-stop shopping for all parking related matters would provide greater service to City residents and visitors, and help to unify parking strategies and management. • Recommendation 2 - The City should hire a parking professional. A parking professional to head up a new parking department would see that all elements of the parking system and user groups are properly serviced. Parking System Goals • Recommendation 3 - The City should develop measurable parking goals. Measurable goals for the parking system ii Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendatio'ns would help to ensure that parking strategies are achieving desired outcomes. Potential goals suggested here relate to high user satisfaction with the parking system, cleanliness and safety of facilities, and pricing strategies which direct appropriate users to on- or off-street parking. Communications and Public Relations • Recommendation 4 - The City should reduce the variety of meter time limits. Some cities have moved to a "2 -hour limit fits all" approach to on -street meters. Hermosa Beach should consider eliminating its 12 hour parking meters, and also consider consolidating other meter time limits to simplify on -street parking. • Recommendation 5 - The City should improve on -street, visual communication regarding parking. We recommend colored decals on parking meters, maintaining colored meter poles, and reinforcing information with curb color, to visually communicate information about parking to the unfamiliar visitor. • Recommendation 6 - The City should positively promote the parking system. The parking system should be positively promoted in literature and other public relations campaigns. Brochures about parking could be distributed to special events coordinators, merchants, and the Chamber of Commerce. • Recommendation 7 - The City should reduce the variety of parking violation categories. There are currently 90 distinct categories of parking citations in Hermosa Beach. We recommend a thorough review of these categories to "weed - out" unnecessary categories. Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations iii Pricing and Enforcement Strategies • Recommendation 8 - The City should increase the cost of on -street parking to discourage long-term parkers from using these spaces. We recommend that all Hermosa Beach on -street meter rates be doubled to $.25/15 minutes. This pricing strategy will have the effect of moving long-term parkers away from on -street spaces. • Recommendation 9 - The City should lower off-street rates relative to on -street rates. If long-term parkers are to be enticed to off-street parking lots, off-street rates should be at or below on -street meter rates. We recommend that off- street parking rates be modified so that the maximum daily rate is $6.00, and that this rate not be varied with the season. • Recommendation 10 - The City should maintain free parking in remote lots and promote remote lots for employee parking. One way to alleviate the downtown parking problem is to better utilize remote lots. We recommend that the City more aggressively promote these free lots for employee parking. • Recommendation 11 - The City should increase fines for parking in residential areas and expired meters. The penalty for parking illegally must be substantially higher than for all -day parking. We recommend that average parking fines be increased 25 %. • Recommendation 12 - The City should increase time periods for parking illegally in residential areas. Currently there is overflow into residential areas because there is not enough parking supply in the downtown to accommodate parking demand. Once additional supply is provided with the new parking structure, we recommend the City increase the window of illegal parking in residential areas. iv Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations Financial Projections • The last section of this report provides financial projections of the parking system based on recommendations contained above. Based on the analysis of future parking demand presented in phase I, and financial assumptions made, we project that an additional $500,000 could be available to the parking system once proposed development is completed. Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations v TABLE OF CONTENTS PARKING MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Organizational Structure 1 Parking System Goals 8 Communications and Public Relations 10 Pricing and Enforcement Strategies 17 Financial Projections 31 Conclusions 36 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Angled Meter with Prominent Time -Limit Decal 12 Figure 2: Parking Signs, Hermosa Beach 13 Figure 3: Parking Brochure Example, Part 1 15 Figure 3: Parking Brochure Example, Part 2 16 Figure 4: Map of Study Area, Three Zones 25 Figure 5: Patron and Employee Demand Vs. On -and Off -Street Supply, 2 pm Weekday 27 Figure 6: Patron and Employee Demand Vs. On -and Off -Street Supply, 9 pm Saturday . 28 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Pros and Cons of Four Organizational Alternatives 6 Table 2: Parking Meter Time Limits 10 Table 3: Parking Meter Time Limits, City Wide 11 Table 4: Southern California Beach Cities, Parking Fee Comparison 19 Table 5: Potential Fee Structure, All Off -Street Parking 22 Table 6: Employee Parking Demand, Proposed Land Usage 24 Table 7: Patron and Employee Demand, Compared to On- and Off -Street Effective Parking Supply, 2 p.m., Weekday 26 Table 8: Patron and Employee Demand, Compared to On- and Off -Street Effective Parking Supply, 9 p.m., Saturday 26 Table 9: Hermosa Beach Parking System Financial Summary, 1994 33 Table 10: Proposed Changes and Potential Financial Impacts to Parking System, Assumes Planned Development is Completed 35 APPENDIX A - C EXHIBIT 1 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 1 PARKING MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS Organizational Structure Until several years ago, the City of Hermosa Beach centralized parking responsibility within a General Services Department. For efficiency reasons, this department was disbanded, however, and parking responsibilities were distributed among several other City departments. The majority of parking responsibility in terms of staffing now rests with the City Police Department. Here, a sergeant within the Community Services Division of the department is responsible for parking enforcement. Total staff includes two full-time supervisors and seven community service officers who perform parking enforcement duties, meter maintenance and collection. These community service officers also have animal control duties as the need arises. Parking system duties also exist within the City's finance department, where residential parking permits are sold and parking fines are collected. Finally, the City has been privatizing a portion of its parking system. A five year contract with Allright Parking to operate City lots A, B, C and H will expire on June 30, 1996. Monitoring of Allright's operations occurs within the City's Public Works Department. In addition to City staff involvement, there is a Downtown Enhancement Commission or D.E.C. that is made up of five citizens with business interests in the downtown. Commissioners are appointed by City Council. The D.E.C. was established in 1993 and replaced and expanded upon the duties of the former "Board of Public Parking Place Commissioners." The ordinance establishing the Downtown Enhancement Commission lists among its activities: • operation and management of parking places • promotion of public events which benefit businesses in the area • promotion of tourism and business within the area 2 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations • capital improvement projects within the district, and • activities which benefit businesses located and operating in the area a Problem - Fragmentation of duties means that parking can not receive full attention in any of the departments with broader, and admittedly, more important law enforcement, financial management, or public infrastructure maintenance duties. In addition, some activities that should be accomplished are falling between the cracks. For instance, no City department or office is setting parking policies, managing public relations related to parking, or developing and implementing parking management strategies. Therefore, we recommend that the City consolidate all parking functions in one of four ways. Alternative 1 --Consolidate all Parking Responsibilities in the Police Department. This is a commonplace organizational arrangement in many cities, universities and hospitals. Police departments often are charged with managing a parking system. The argument for this type of organizational structure is that during police patrols, officers can also monitor compliance of parking regulations. The intent is to maximize human resources by having staff handle more than one responsibility simultaneously. The primary disadvantage of this structure is that parking services receive less attention than policing activities. Not that this is wrong; virtually everyone would agree that law enforcement activities are more important than parking services. However, under this scenario, parking services are often performed less efficiently and with less quality than is possible under an alternative organizational structure. Alternative 2—Form an Independent Parking Department. The notion of a single source responsibility center for parking became popular within the parking industry in the early 1980's. This management principle recognizes that the management of a particular discipline, in this case parking resources, requires control over all of its components. Stated another way, since the individual Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 3 components of a discipline are interrelated, its effective management requires the ability to manipulate, communicate and coordinate internal and external variables. From a private citizen's perspective, one City department would mean one-stop shopping for any parking related matter, which can eliminate confusion and save time. This alternative may cost more than the current decentralized approach. In 1994-95, parking enforcement and other parking related activities within the City's police department cost $607,000. An additional $249,000 was expended for cashiering (selling annual permits and collecting fines) in the finance department. Other parking related activities are clearly taking place in other departments, such as public works, but are not recorded as parking expenditures within the City's financial system. We believe that additional costs may be justified through the stronger management approach gained from consolidation. As we are recommending it, such a department would occupy the same line reporting relationship within the City's organizational structure as current departments such as Finance, Community Development and Public Works. Additional personnel costs to the City, however, are estimated to consist of only two additional staff, a director and a support staff position at either a secretary or executive assistant level. Other staff which would be in this new department would come from transfers of existing positions in other areas, such as cashier positions involved in the sale of residential permits or collection of fine revenue, or enforcement staff now in the police department. Form one City Parking Department with responsibility for all on- and off-street parking matters. The new department would consolidate permitting and enforcement into one City agency, as well as manage an overall parking strategy. 4 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations Alternative 3 --Consolidate Parking Responsibilities in an Existing City Department. If there is reluctance to create a separate parking department for fiscal reasons, we recommend that at a minimum, parking responsibilities be consolidated in an existing department. The parking function should be clearly titled as a division -level activity (such as the current Planning Division within the Department of Community Development.) If Hermosa Beach is to present a responsive, service-oriented downtown, it is important that one area have parking as its sole mission. This parking division could coordinate the various activities related to parking, even if the activities were not moved to the new parking division. For instance, the City may opt to keep parking enforcement within the police department, but have management of overall parking strategy, parking public relations, management and monitoring of public lots, and meter collection and maintenance in a single division. To illustrate the importance of centralizing functions to improve services and communications with the public, we placed a phone call to the City of Hermosa Beach to inquire about parking services. We called the number that was provided by directory assistance for general information for city government. We were given the number for the City Clerk's office. The employee who answered the phone was extremely helpful and service oriented, but did not know how to direct us when we informed her that we wanted "general information about parking in the City." She asked if we had a parking ticket. We answered "no" and said that we were seeking more general information and could we speak to someone in charge of parking. She concluded that she needed to give us three numbers, and proceeded to provide the phone numbers for General Services, Public Works, and the Police Department. If the City were to create a Parking Division within an existing department, we believe that Public Works or Finance would be likely candidates to assume additional parking activities. We also estimate that this alternative could be slightly less costly in terms of personnel. The savings would result from the difference between a department head salary and a division head salary. A support . staff position is still recommended for this alternative, however Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 5 Alternative 4 --Hire a Parking Operator. Parking management companies are willing, for a fee, to operate the City's parking system. These companies would perform the same duties now conducted by current City staff, including enforcement of City parking regulations, revenue collection, and the administration of parking permits. In essence, hiring of a parking operator would mean an expansion of the contractual arrangement the City now has with Allright Parking to operate four City parking lots. The advantage of hiring a parking operator would be to give the police department focus on law enforcement activities and eliminate the distractions of parking enforcement. The disadvantage of hiring a parking operator is that the City would be further away from the parking system management. This would mean less control of parking activities than the City now maintains. In our experience, to properly insure the accuracy and integrity of the operator's revenue collection system, City financial staff must be regularly involved in monitoring parking operators' performance. With added responsibilities for the third party contractor, and oversight required by City staff, the arrangement may prove to be more costly to the City than managing parking in- house. Pros and cons of, the four alternatives are summarized in Table 1. 6 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations Table 1: Pros and Cons of Four Organizational Alternatives Alternative Pros Cons Consolidate Functions in the Police Department - Parking Enforcement Performed w/ Other Law Enforcement Activities - Parking Receives Minimal Attention Form an Independent Parking Department -All Parking Matters Consolidated for "Systems Approach" to Parking Management -May Cost More Consolidate Parking Management in Existing Department - Division would have Parking as its sole mission. - May cost less than new Department -May not provide the same level of coordination as a single Department, especially if functions remain outside of the Division's span of control Hire a Parking Operator - Removes City Staff from Day -to -Day Oversight of Parking Matters - Less Control of Operations and Fmancial Proceedings -May Cost More - Substantial City Monitoring Required agr Recommendation 1, Form a Parking Department - In the case of Hermosa Beach, we believe that there is sufficient complexity to warrant the creation of a parking department. Parking revenues are now close to $2 million annually, and will 'rise as additional development and the proposed new parking structure comes on-line. Although we realize that this model may not be in place in other similarly sized cities and beach communities, a centralized approach would have the most dramatic impact on efficient coordination of parking. Also, Hermosa Beach is a high profile beach community, with the annual volleyball tournament shown on national cable television. We believe that, given its profile, a parking department would serve a valuable and needed role in the community. Finally, as part of our phone survey of neighboring jurisdictions to gather parking rate information, we generally encountered a model closest to Alternative 3 above, in that parking services were placed within a larger department. In general, however, we were more Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 7 quickly directed to the person or office with parking information than we were in Hermosa Beach. Recommendation 2, Hire a Parking Professional - Once a parking department is formed, we believe the City should hire a parking professional to see that all elements of the parking system and user groups are properly serviced. For instance, are long-term employee parkers kept away from short-term retail/restaurant patron parking? What are the opportunities for shared parking within downtown Hermosa Beach? (Shared parking is the opportunity to reduce the number of total spaces in mixed use developments due to sharing of spaces among various land uses). Are parking enforcement strategies properly targeted and successful? Who oversees the enforcement process, dictates priorities and offers direction? Are parking expenses and revenues accounted for and known? Is there a parking advocate who can take legitimate parking concerns and translate them into workable parking strategies? Who develops and manages public relations efforts for the parking system? Someone must be cognizant of objectives, oversee personnel, prudently expend funds, maintain equipment and facilities, and respond intelligently to changing parking needs. If the City were to develop parking as a function within an existing department, we would recommend that at least this parking management position be added. A successful parking management position has some major charges and requirements. Within the confines of the larger City government structure, these include the following: • Setting policies and procedures • Overseeing personnel • Overseeing systems • Overseeing contracts • Promoting community relations • Expending funds and collecting revenues • Overseeing capital projects; and • Planning future facilities 8 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations Parking System Goals Exhibit 1 at the end of this report presents an example of a job description for the director of City parking services. It should be noted that this job description was written from the perspective of a newly formed parking department with existing functions moved into it, not as a Division level position which coordinates activities in various departments without direct supervision. For more information on identifying parking professionals, we recommend the City contact the International Parking Institute (IPI) about its Certified Administrator of Public Parking (CAPP) program. More information about the CAPP program is contained in Appendix A. A list of parking goals was developed by DKS Associates in 1987 as part of a general plan for the City. A review of these goals indicates that they directly relate to the City's parking deficit, and focus on ways to increase supply. For instance: "Ensure an adequate supply of parking, both on -street and off- street, to meet the needs of both residents an commercial businesses." Implementation policies under this goal relate to studying construction of public parking facilities, encouraging preferential parking for high occupancy vehicles, and investigating park and ride sites at the City's borders. Problem - Although there is little doubt that the City faces a parking shortage, and goals to increase parking supply are warranted, we recommend that operational goals for the City's parking system also be developed. Without a clear focus, the City lacks direction for its overall parking strategy. It cannot plan for City parking if it does not know where it's headed. City officials cannot assure that parking is available for appropriate user groups, if there are not decisions on where various user groups should park. Recommendation 3, Develop Measurable Parking Goals - There should be a clear, concise statement of parking goals, so that present and future parking management strategies remain consistent withthese goals. Although goals for the parking system need to Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 9 ultimately be determined by City residents, staff, and elected officials, the following list provides suggestions: Convenient on -street parking should be reserved for short- term parkers (downtown shoppers and patrons) as much as possible. On -street parking spaces should never be more than 90% occupied. • The parking facilities in the downtown CBD, whether public or private, should present a consistent and unified appearance and level of service to the parker. Develop measurable parking goals for the City. • Off-street parking facilities, particularly new structure(s) should be kept clean, well lit, and secure at all times. • Pricing strategies should be monitored on an annual basis, to assure that economic incentives are in place to encourage long term parkers to off-street facilities. Off-street parking rates should be at or below on -street meter rates. • Satisfaction with the City's parking system should be monitored on an annual basis through surveys, meetings, and other input from residents, merchants, and visitors. • The system should strive for financial self-sufficiency. • The parking system should be run as efficiently and cost effectively as possible, while maintaining appropriate services. 10 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations Communications and Public Relations Hermosa Beach currently has several parking zones (identified by curb color), different parking meter time limits, and different enforcement procedures depending on the zone. Layered on top of these variables is a residential parking permit program which also impacts where and for how long a vehicle may be parked. These alternatives create a very complex parking system for a city that attracts many tourists. A City brochure marketed to tourists, and titled "A Guide: The DOs and DON'Ts of Parking in Hermosa Beach" consists of a full four pages of text to explain the parking system. b Problem - Communications regarding parking and public relations of the parking system are now limited. Consequently, tourists do not have information on where they can or cannot park. It is difficult to decipher meters and the information being communicated about the parking system, while driving. Finally, based on face-to-face meetings with merchants, as well as minutes of various public forums, merchants, residents and tourists perceive the parking system as complex and enforcement procedures as unforgiving. ear Recommendation 4, Reduce the Variety of Meter Time Limits - To simplify their parking systems, many cities have moved to a "2 - hour limit fits all" approach to on -street meters. For Hermosa Beach, the 2 -hour limit is not the predominant one, however. Sixty percent of all meters in the study area are 3 -hour meters (see Table 2). We assume that this is to accommodate longer restaurant and retail patron needs in Area 1. Table 2: Parking Meter Time Limits, Study Area 15 min. 2 hr. 3 hr. 12 hr. Total Area 1 6 0 332 89 427 Area 2 0 129 7 1 137 Total 6 129 339 90 564 % 4.0% 23.0% 60.0% 16.0% 100.0% Source: IBI Group Parking Study Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 11 The study area contains approximately one third of all of the meters in the City. The City police department provided a breakdown of all on -street meters by area. There are currently 1,617 parking meters in Hermosa Beach. Areas outside of the study area are dominated by 12 hour meters. Table 3 provides an approximate count of all City meters by time limit. Table 3: Parking Meter Time Limits, City Wide 15 min. 2 hr. 3 hr. 12 hr. Total Meters 6 164 339 1,108 1,617 .37% 10.1% 21.0% 68.5% 100.0% Source: Hermosa Beach Police Department We recommend that the City simplify and consolidate its current on - street meter time limits through the following actions: • Consider removing 12 -hour meters altogether. The goal of on -street parking rates and time limits should be to encourage limited stays and thus parking turnover. Longer term parkers should be encouraged to use City lots. • Consider eliminating the 2 hour meters. These actions would simplify on -street parking by reducing the majority of on -street meters to 3 hours. Simplify and better communicate parking rates, time limits, and enforcement . gar Reconunendation 5, Improve On -Street, Visual Communication Regarding Parking - The City should better communicate parking information in quick, comprehensible ways. For instance, some cities have placed brightly colored decals at the top of all on -street meters to communicate different time limits. Meters may also be placed at angles to the street so that drivers can better spot the decals (see Figure 1). From our observations, these decals are 12 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations much more noticeable than the different colored meter poles in Hermosa Beach. Also, as one of the predominant pole colors is silver, a common color in manufactured parking meters, it is unlikely that this pole color would signify anything to an unfamiliar driver or casual observer. Non-residents particularly, do not know what the different colored meter poles mean. Angled meter poles are already a part of the downtown sidewalk reconfiguration plan. The more information that is communicated visually, the better. Therefore, we would recommend that as many visual cues be provided as is financially feasible. These include: • Maintaining colored meter poles • Adding colorful decals • Reinforcing information with curb color Figure 1: Angled Meter with Prominent Time -Limit Decal Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 13 Obviously, on -street communication can be simplified if the parking system itself is streamlined. Figure 2 shows one Hermosa Beach sign pole with three separate parking signs communicating different Figure 2: Parking Signs, Hermosa Beach regulations. One sign has to do with parking exceptions for residential permit holders. Again, the City should consider alternatives to communicate this information, such as curb color or a "residential parking zone" logo on separate signs. ier Recommendation 6, Positively Promote the Parking System - We recommend that once improvements to the parking system are made, that the system be positively promoted. .The current City brochure, entitled "The DO's and DON'Ts of Parking in Hermosa Beach," is not a friendly document. The "Don't Park" section precedes, and is longer than, the section which discusses where one 14 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations may park. Moreover, it is unclear how this information is distributed. We obtained a copy from City Hall, but most tourists do not stop at City Hall before enjoying Hermosa Beach amenities. Figure 3 on the following pages, titled "Between the Lines" is from another parking system. It offers concise information about parking regulations in a positive, upbeat tone. We suggest that written materials like this one be published and made available to local merchants, special events promoters, and the Chamber of Commerce for distribution. b Problem - Too many parking violation codes create paperwork and demand excess staff time. The Finance Department provided a list of 90 distinct parking violation codes (see Appendix B). Some of these codes are distinguished by the time limit variations discussed above. For instance, there are separate citations for exceeding a 1 - hour limit and a 2 -hour limit. Many of the codes seem to deal with certain time periods when parking is disallowed. For instance, code 103 is for "No Parking, Monday 10 a.m. to 2 p.m." and code 104 is for "No Parking, Monday 8 a.m. to 9 a.m.". We assume that these separate code numbers must be recorded in the field and as revenue is collected, each transaction involving staff time and paperwork. Recommendation 7, Reduce the Number of Parking Violation Categories. We recommend a thorough review of the City's parking citations to determine the value of the 90 individual categories, and to determine if several categories might be consolidated. More in-depth interviews with City staff would be required to determine which violation categories could be eliminated, a task beyond the scope of this project. To help with this analysis, we requested information from the City finance department to analyze which violation categories are most frequently used. In 1994-95, total parking ticket revenue was $917,000. A breakdown of this total by citation category was not readily available from the City's financial system, however. Betwe the Line Questions and Answers for the Parking Cardholder Q: Do I receive a specified parking space? A: Specific parking spaces are not assigned Your monthly card, however, assures parking space within the facility for which it is issued. Q What is The Wilmington Parking Authority's liability for my car and its contents while on the premises? A: Your access card is a Contract of Lease between the Authority (Lessor) and you (Tenant) for parking space. By renting space, you agree that there is no Bailor/ Bailee relationship between us. The Lessor is not responsible for personal property and assumes no liability for fire, theft or casualty except from its own negligence. Any suits or action against Lessor for any claims arising out of the lease must be filed within 90 days of date of occupancy of the leased premises. Q Could I receive a parking violation or have my car towed within the facility? A: Yes, your car can be ticketed and/or towed if it is parked in a handicapped space, or blocks a vital passageway Q: Can my card be revoked? Al Yes. Fraudulent use of a. monthly parking card, or persistent failure to comply with the rules and regulations wit result in perma- nent revocation ermanentrevocation of the card. The Wilmington Parking Authority Facilities Locations L I Fin Jo�1LJ 1»uLL 1 J 1 LJLU L L I luu_JL �J JJJL E -1f LJ 1n -,711 t IJ,H I r r-- ir-", n iLiD_J!_�Ll Jpiji- 11 '17'' i L Figure 3: Parking Brochure Example, Part 1 Facility 12th & Washington Streets 7 a.m. 7 p.m. Christina Gateway Garage 7th & King Streets Operating Hours Train Station Garage Martin Luther King Blvd. & King Streets 6th & Orange Streets Surface Lot 6th & Orange Streets Surface Lot Radisson Level A: 24 hours Levels 8 8 C: 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. VIP level: 24 hours ALICO Level 1: 24 hours Levels 2 & 3: 7 a.m. • 7 p.m. Knoll: 24 hours 24 hours 7 a.m. - 7 p. m 7 a.m. 9 p.m The following facilities are currently operated for the Wilmington Parking Authority by Colonial Parking, Inc. All rules and regulations contained herein do not apply. For information, call Colonia/ Parking of 651-3600 Brandywine Gateway Garage 13th 8 King Streets Hercules Building Garage 13th 8 Market Streets W 7a.m.-9p.m. 7a.m.-7p.m. A' 1 r. 1' Important Memoder. Tot All Mteatbhl Grebe $ Welcome to The Tabalaitou Tartans Authority system! rims* review tbe attached arid efflelest pirlible. we do our part to provide sale, cloth and automated tl yes is morplbuseeoar roles ase regulation's. The Magic of Your Monthly Access Card The Monthly Access Card you lease from The Wilmington Parking Authority is a little plastic wizard that activates an entire electronic system. It is coded for your specific use. If your card fails to activate the gate, take a daily ticket to obtain entry and call the main office at 427-6773 as soon as possible, but no later than 4:00 p.m. to avoid inconvenience upon exiting. Warnings DO NOT offer your card to another driver once your car is in the facility. The card will not work again until your car has exited. Monthly customers who do not have their card on a given day, must call the main office at 427-6773 as soon as possible, but no later than 4:00 p.m. to obtain authorization to exit. Other- wise, you will be asked to pay the daily rate. Designated Facility Your Monthly Access Card is valid only at the designated facility. Important: Please note the days and hours of operation for each facility listed on the back panel of this brochure. Payment Checks or money orders must be received by The Wilmington Parking Authority no later than the first of any given month for the following month. If a monthly payment is not received by the 5th of the month, the card will be de- activated. Commencing the 6th of the month, monthly parkers who have not made payment must pay a non-refundable daily fee for each day that payment is not made. Please put the number of your monthly parking card on your check. Security Charges Plastic monthly cardholders will pay a security charge of $25. Hang tag holders will pay a $10 security charge. These security charges are refundable upon cancellation, provided that the card or hang tag is returned in reusable condition. An additional charge, equal to the Security charge, will be levied if a card or hang tag is lost and must be replaced. Please notify the Parking Authority if you wish to cancel your monthly parking privilege. Return your card to the Parking Authority offices at the Linden Building, 625 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801-2222, along with your current mailing address. If the card is returned in a reusable condition. we will mail a refund check for the amount of the security charge paid. Payment Methods Payments can be made by mail or dropped into boxes conveniently located on the wall of the manager's office at each facility, or at The Wilmington Parking Authority's Administrative Offices located in the Linden Building, 625 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801-2222. Monthly payments for 8th 8 Orange Street location, may be made in the Authority's office or mailed in the envelopes provided by The Wilmington Parking Authority at that facility. Figure 3: Parking Brochure Example, Part 2 Information Our on site personnel are well informed, but may not have the answer to all of your questions or concerns. Please feel free to call our administrative office at 427-6773 between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. We will make every effort to give you a complete and timely answer Vacations, illness or Other Leaves NO credit will be given for any periods of non- use, in keeping with standard lease practices. You are expected to pay your monthly parking fee, whether you're on vacation, ill, etc. You do. however, have the right to sub -let your parking space during your absence. Please inform the Authority of the name, phone number and license plate number of the person who will occupy your space }{ during that time t It is extremely important that we have your current license plate number and your current business phone number on file, in the event t it is necessary to assist you should you leave your lights on, or for any other emergency 41Q41 - to et co t0 O co Hermosa Beach. Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 17 Pricing and Enforcement The economic laws of supply and demand apply to parking as much Strategies as to they do to other industries. The most precious parking commodity within any city is its on -street parking supply. The question is, who should be able to use that most precious parking space? Should it be the retail store owner, restaurant employee, office employee, the shopper or other business related visitor? The short-term parker --particularly the customer, is the obvious answer, based on comments made by Hermosa Beach officials and merchants. As the City clarifies its parking strategy, rate changes can be used to influence desired user groups to park in certain areas, and to discourage others from parking in areas where they should not be. The city already does this to a certain extent, for instance, by citing non-residents for parking in a residential zone. oProblem - Employees who require full-day parking are parking in on -street, metered spaces. Long terms parkers can avoid parking citations by moving their car from space to space throughout the day. During our field work in the City, on several occasions we experimented with parking in one 2 hour meter, seeing that the vehicle tire had been chalked during the 2 hours, and then moving the car forward one parking space to get another 2 hours of parking. We were not ticketed because we did not violate the letter of the law. However, we clearly violated the spirit of the law, which is designed to provide on -street parking turnover. We believe that many other long-term parkers are doing the say thing. The problem of employees parking in on -street spaces was reinforced in our discussions with merchants and Chamber of Commerce officials, and the City of Hermosa Beach Police sergeant in charge of enforcement. The sergeant estimated that more than half of all parking violations came from exceeding time limits at short-term (2 to 3 hour limit) spaces. Also, when one considers the availability of 12 hour meters outside of the study area, the City has, in fact, encouraged long-term parkers to use on -street spaces. When short-term parkers such as restaurant and retail patrons, come downtown for several hours of business, they are less likely to find convenient, on -street parking. 18 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations Background - The parking meter was invented in the mid -1930's as a device to reserve the most desirable spaces for the customer. The theory is that the customer will happily pay a charge for highly convenient, "in demand" parking, because the stay is short and the overall cost is nominal. The device was primarily designed to promote "turnover", that is the use of the space by multiple short- term parkers over the course of the day. The long term parkers, however, would pay a much higher fee, have to feed the meter, and risk getting a ticket if unable to return to pay for additional time. Originally, the alternative parking for long-term parkers, typically employees, was free; so the economic disincentive for parking at short-term meters was great. Over time, the meter has also become viewed as a revenue collection device, and the use of meters was expanded to collect fees from spaces for long-term parking. However, the equation employed in setting meter rates often is not based on the economic law of supply and demand. The rate should reflect the demand for parking at that location --a price/convenience relationship. If the short-term spaces are the most convenient and desirable, there must be a substantially lower cost to park at a long- term space. In many places, meter rates have been raised at a far slower pace than inflation, making the short term rates more affordable for all day parkers. With lax enforcement and the ability to avoid paying for the full length of stay, the gap in cost between short-term and long-term parking costs has become too narrow. With little difference in overall cost (between feeding a short-term meter and parking at a long-term site) the goal of promoting turnover is lost. Recommendation 8, Increase the Cost of On -Street Parking to Discourage Long -Term Parkers from Using These Spaces. In Hermosa Beach, on -street parking rates should be high enough to encourage the use of public lots for longer term parking, such as employee parking, as well as to encourage on -street parking turnover. The current rate of 25C per half hour is also below rates of surrounding beach communities, as documented in Walker's recent phone survey of surrounding cities. See Table 4 on the next page. We recommend that on -street parking be at least 25C for Table 4: Southern California Beach Cities, Parking Fee Comparison City Organizational Notes- "Where is Parking Responsibility?" Meter Rates Public Lot Rates Garage Rates Seasonal Variation in Rates? Oceanside Within "Parking Administration" $.25/15 min. $3 - 5/day N/A No Long Beach No single department now, but in process of consolidating into "Marine and Police Department" $.25/hour in areas farthest from beach, $.25/30 min. in areas near beach $.25/hr. in metered lots, $4.00/day flat rate in others N/A No San Clemente N/A $.25/20 min. $1.00/day in Metrolink lots, to $5.00/day N/A No Dana Point Within County Parking Department Raised to $.25/15 min. as of 1/1/96. $.25/15 minutes in metered lots, but planning to move to gated lots. N/A No Hermosa Beach Parking Responsibilities within Police, Finance, Public Works, General Services $.25/30 min. $1.25/30 min., $12.00 day maximum, $7.00 day maximum off-season N/A Yes Laguna Beach Collection and Meter Services within Parking Authority, Enforcement within Police Department $.25/15 min. $1.00/hr.,$6.00 day for special events, one surface lot is $6.00/day in summer months $.25/15 min. Yes Redondo Beach (1) Parking Enforcement Office part of Parking and Animal Control $.25/15 min. $.25/15 min. $.25/15 min. N/A o Table 4 (Cont'd): Southern California Beach Cities, Parking Fee Comparison City Organizational Notes- "Where is Parking Responsibility?" Meter Rates Public Lot Rates Garage Rates Seasonal Variation in Rates? Manhattan Beach Within "Parking and Animal Control" $.25/hour in areas farthest from beach, $.25/15 min. in areas near beach Pier Lots are $1.00 hr/ maximum of $5.00/day Metered Lots - same as on -street No Newport Beach Within "Marine Department" Business Areas $.25/hr., Recreational Areas $.25/15 min. $1.00/hr. up to $6.00/day in Winter, $10.00/day in summer N/A Yes Huntington Beach Within "Parking/Camping" Department $.25/15 minutes in all areas (business, residential, recreational) $6.00 flat rate, pay as you enter First hr. is free, 2nd hour is $2.00, $1.00/hr. after that No Seal Beach Within "Administrative Services/Finance" No on -street meters now, but they are "considering it" Summer, $5.00/day, Weekends/Holidays $6.00/day, Off - Season, $4.00/day N/A Yes Encinitas N/A No Parking Meters No Public Lots N/A No Source: Walker Phone Survey, February 1996. (1) Redondo Beach did not return phone call. Information from IBI Group, Downtotwn Implementation Plan, October 1994. Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 21 every 15 minutes. This is the rate charged in Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach's closest neighbors. Use pricing strategies to encourage appropriate user groups. We recognize that this recommendation will be met with the resistance of the retail community. This community most often articulates that higher on -street parking rates will cause parkers to shop elsewhere, and will diminish their business. This has not been the national experience. On the contrary, we have found that increasing parking turnover through higher meter prices reduces abuse by long-term parkers, and creates a better climate for business. Walker performed a comprehensive survey for the City of San Jose to determine factors which motivated them to patronize downtown merchants. Shoppers were surveyed as they exited retail stores. The sample size was sufficient to achieve a 95 % confidence level and a ±5 % margin of error. Downtown shoppers indicated that parking rates and parking validation programs were not a primary reason for shopping in the downtown. Rather, respondents cited others reasons such as merchandise selection, location, price, a particular store, and service, for coming downtown. Respondents also indicated that they chose their parking location for convenience (63%) rather than for price. Higher on -street parking rates will also serve to diminish the reliance on enforcement alone, because parkers will be making an economic decision based on the likelihood of being detected by enforcement and a higher cost. Short-term parkers first want a close parking space; the price is a secondary consideration. Long- term parkers avoid higher prices and the exposure to enforcement. par Recommendation 9, Lower Off -Street Rates Relative to On - Street Rates. Off-street parking rates must reward the long-term parker for choosing off-street, less convenient parking and thereby preserving on -street meters for short-term parking. Again, in reviewing Table 4 one can see that Hermosa Beach's off-street rates are substantially higher than surrounding areas' rates. The rate has 22 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations the desired effect of discouraging the short-term parker at $1.25 for 30 minutes (now five times the rate of the on -street meters), but hardly serves to entice the long-term parker at $12.00 for the day. We recommend that the benefit to the long-term parker be evident, through lowering the maximum rate to $6.00 or $7.00 for the full day. Table 5 presents a potential fee structure for off-street parking. This is a front -loaded fee structure, with the first four hours at the same rate as on -street parking, then dropping off to benefit the all - day parker. Table 5: Potential Fee Structure, All Off -Street Parking, Including Proposed Structure First 2 3rd and 4th 5th and 6th Maximum Hours Hours Hours Total $1.00/Hour $1.00/Hour $.75/Hour $6.00 Cumulative Total $2.00 $4.00 $5.50 $6.00 Currently, $7.00 is the maximum fee for lot parking during the off- season, November 1 to May 31, although the fee structure is not graduated as recommended in Table 5. Fees are then raised to rates shown in Table 4 for the peak season, $1.25/half hour and $12.00 maximum per day. Although the demand is greater from June through October, raising the off-street rates while maintaining the same on -street meter rates will diminish the effectiveness of price as a rationing tool between short and long-term parkers. In summary, our recommendation regarding off-street rates are the following: Lower off-street parking rates relative to on -street rates. In the schedule presented in Table 5, the savings benefit to long-term parkers begins with the 5th and 6th hours, with hourly rates of $.75/hour compared to our recommendation of $1.00 per hour for on -street meter rates. Identify one rate schedule for all off-street sites, including the proposed parking structure. The parking structure should attract Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 23 the same user groups as the current surface lots. Therefore, we recommend that one rate be used for all off-street parking. Maintain one parking rate throughout the year. Raising off-street parking rates during busier summer months will discourage beach - goers and other long-term parkers such as employees, from using off-street facilities. This will exacerbate the problem of long-term parkers intruding into residential areas. Of the eleven beach communities we surveyed regarding parking rates, only three raised rates for the busier summer months. Consider meters in off-street lots as a last resort. We realize that there are plans to place meters in existing lots when the current contract with Allright Parking ends in June, 1996. Meters do not provide the flexibility to charge a front -loaded sliding scale. If meters are put in place, they should have a lower parking rate than more convenient, on -street spaces. Availability of On- and Off -Street Parking for Appropriate User Groups- The primary objective of the on- and off-street pricing recommendations presented above is to create economic incentives for long-term parkers (generally employees) to use off- street facilities. This in turn frees up on -street parking for the short-term parker (retail and restaurant patrons, or visitors to offices). Building on the supply demand analysis in the first phase of the parking study, we compare the effective supply of on- and off-street parking to the parking demand generated by short-term versus long-term parkers. Previous studies provide projections of employee parking demand based on land usage. We used an established ratio of employee to customer parking demand to determine the impact of employee parking demand in the study area. Table 6 shows the peak weekday employee parking demand for office, retail, restaurant and hotel under projected land use conditions. The adjusted weekday demand ratio column shows the demand ratios used in the supply/demand portion of our study. Parking demand has been "adjusted" for driving and non -captive ratios. The table shows that the majority 24 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations of parking demand for office buildings is generated by employees, while most parking demand for restaurants is generated by patrons. Table 6: Employee Parking Demand, Proposed Land Usage Adjusted Employee Peak Weekday Weekday Employee Study Demand Demand Parking Area Ratio Ratio Demand Office (sq.ft.) 106,867 2.50 per 2.36 per 252 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. Retail (sq.ft.) 190,610 1.86 per .31 per 1,000 59 1,000 sq. ft. sq. ft. Restaurant 138,716 8.40 per 1.05 per 146 (sq.ft.) 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. Hotel (rooms) 189 1.00 per .20 per room 38 room Total 495 This analysis estimates that the highest weekday employee demand in the study area is 495. However, these figures have not been adjusted for time of day, as there are varying levels of demand between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., for . instance, particularly for restaurant and retail land uses. Employee Vs. Patron Parking Demand, Two Hours - From the ratios shown in Table 6, we are able to use the shared parking analysis in Phase I to break out employee parking demand from total parking demand at various hours of the day. For the analysis, we have chosen 2 p.m. on a summer weekday, and the peak demand hour, 9 p.m. on a Saturday night. Also, we have further divided the study area into zones by splitting Area 1 into Zones A and B. Zone A is north of Pier Avenue, and Zone B is south of Pier Avenue. Zone C matches Area 2, the blocks east of Manhattan. See Figure 4 on the following page. Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 25 Figure 4: Map of Study Area, Three Zones - AREA 2 - ZONE A - ZONE B - ZONE C HERMOSA AVENUE 12 26 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations Tables 7 and 8 show patron and employee demand, compared to the effective supply of on- and off-street parking, for 2 p.m. weekday and 9 p.m. Saturday. Table 7: Patron and Employee Demand, Compared to On- and Off -Street Effective Parking Supply, 2 p.m., Weekday Patron On -Street Employee Off -Street Parking Effective Parking Effective Demand Supply Demand Supply Zone A 423 171 147 314 Zone B 351 165 119 283 Zone C 104 122 112 204 Total 878 458 378 801 Table 8: Patron and Employee Demand, Compared to On- and Off -Street Effective Parking Supply, 9 p.m., Saturday Patron On -Street Employee Off -Street Parking Effective Parking Effective Demand Supply Demand Supply Zone A 657 171 103 314 Zone B 750 165 113 283 Zone C 113 122 16 204 Total 1,520 458 232 801 Figures 5 and 6 on the following pages are graphical presentations of the data shown in the tables above. There is more employee parking during the day, as office space uses are dominated by employees. Table 7 above shows that there is ample off-street parking in the study area for employees at 2 p.m. on a weekday. There is not enough effective on -street supply, however, for patrons vying for convenient, on -street spaces. At the 2 p.m. weekday hour we project a slight surplus in the study area of 3 spaces, when total Parking Spaces Figure 5: Patron and Employee Demand Vs. On- and Off -Street Supply 2 pm, Weekday in Summer, Proposed Development Scenario Zone A Total Parking Space Surplus is 3 Spaces at 2pm, Summer weekday Zone A = (86), Zone B = (21), Zone C = 110 Zone B Zone C a MI Patron Demand Ei On -Street Supply Employee Demand o Off -Street Supply suo vpuawWOdaJ 1o.tJuod pun;ua Parking Spaces Figure 6: Patron and Employee Demand Vs. On- and Off -Street Supply 9 pm, Saturday in Summer, Proposed Development Scenario Zone A Total Parking Space Deficit is 493 Spaces at this peak hour Zone A = (276), Zone B = (414), Zone C = 197 . J Zone B Zone C MP Patron Demand %' On -Street Supply MN Employee Demand 1 Off -Street Supply JV UMo,lunaoU uavag vsouuaH Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 29 demand (1,256 spaces) is compared to total effective supply (1,259 spaces). At 9 p.m. on a Saturday night, parking demand is at its peak. Less of the demand is generated by employees, as restaurant demand is driving the high parking demand at this hour. The ratio of restaurant employees to restaurant patrons is relatively low, as shown in Table 6. Our model projects that of the total parking demand of 1,752 at 9 p.m. on a summer Saturday, 1,520 are restaurant, retail, or hotel patrons. Obviously, the on -street effective supply falls far short of the patron parking demand in Zones A and B, as can be seen when comparing the red demand bar with the green supply bar in Figure 6. Only in Zone C would patrons find ample on -street spaces, presuming that patrons of Zone A and B restaurants haven't taken the spot first! It is projected that at 9 p.m., the total study area parking deficit is 493 spaces. We conclude that there is adequate off-street parking to accommodate downtown Hermosa Beach employees, and recommend that pricing strategies be employed to encourage employees to park in off-street lots. It appears that there is not enough on -street parking, however, to accommodate the people who come to Hermosa Beach to enjoy its restaurants and retail establishments. Unfortunately, additional on -street parking cannot easily be added to an established CBD. Therefore, the addition of the proposed parking structure in Zone A will help alleviate some of the parking pressures the City is now experiencing and will continue to experience as the downtown is further developed. Recommendation 10, Maintain Free Parking in City's Remote Parking Lots, Promote Remote Lots for Employee Parking. Outside of the study area, the City maintains several remote surface parking lots. The Community Center lot has 125 spaces, the Greenbelt lot between 1 lth and 8th streets has 60 spaces, and two smaller lots along Valley Drive have 22 and 12 spaces. Another lot associated with Von's Shopping Center is metered and also contains some private spaces. Although these lots may serve patrons and employees to Area 2, along upper Pier Avenue, they are much less convenient to employees and patrons of Area 1. Generally, long 30 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations term parkers such as employees want easy access to their vehicles during the day. These lots would not provide that level of convenience to Area 1 employees. However, if they are free, and on -street parking rates are doubled, there is incentive for long term parkers to utilize the remote lots. Considering Regular Shuttle Service - The Chamber of Commerce operates a shuttle service to and from remote lots during special events such as arts and crafts shows. Otherwise, there is no regular shuttle service serving the CBD from the lots. Chamber of Commerce staff also informed us that there was "some discussion of a tri -city shuttle service" several years ago, which would have involved shuttle service around Redondo, Manhattan, and Hermosa Beaches, but the service did not become reality. We do not have more information on this idea, but surmise that it was deemed too costly. Based on previous Walker studies, a regular employee shuttle bus generally costs between $25 and $30 an hour to operate. If the shuttle ran for 5 days per week, 9 hours per day, the annualized cost would be between $58,500 and $70,200. To summarize, the City should: • Maintain the remote lots as free parking for all who park there • Target employees as users of the remote lots, and promote their use through the Chamber of Commerce and other business groups ler Recommendation 11, Increase Fines for Parking in Residential Zones, Expired Meters. The penalty for parking illegally must be substantially higher than for all -day parking. Otherwise people will not be dissuaded from all -day parking in areas where they should not park. One person we interviewed said, in essence, that the parking system was so confusing and the parking shortage so acute, that some people just "saw the cost of a ticket as the cost of parking in Hermosa Beach". The majority of parking citation fines are now $20. All day parking in the City lot during the summer is $12, or just $8 less than many fines. We recommend that while the Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 31 number of citations be simplified, the fines be increased to provide greater financial disincentives to illegal parking. mar Recommendation 12, Increase Time Periods of Illegal Parking in Residential Zones. According to the "Residential Parking Permit Instructions" flyer obtained at the Finance Department, "the overnight NO PARKING restriction in residential areas applies between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. in the morning. At this point in time, some overflow of downtown patrons into residential areas is largely unavoidable, as at peak hours in the summer there is not enough parking in the study area to accommodate patrons to the downtown on weekend evenings. Parking demand is projected to increase with the completion of proposed downtown development. However, the proposed structure will be more convenient to much of this development than will residential areas. Once more off-street parking is available. we would recommend that the time period of illegal parking in residential areas be increased, perhaps to begin as early as 6 or 7 p.m. This would preserve residential spaces for residents in the evening, and force patrons into allowable off-street parking spaces. Also, strict enforcement of these particular parking violations, along with higher fines, would serve to limit residential zone parking by non-residents during peak parking demand hours. Financial Projections The City's parking revenues from fines, permits, and meters, exceed the costs of enforcement and administration by approximately $1,000,000 per year. Although the cost of operating a parking structure will add to total parking operating expenditures, we believe there is potential for increased revenues through raising on -street parking rates, a review of fine rates, as well as increased demand for parking with proposed development completed in the future. Establish a goal of self-support for new parking structure and overall parking system. 32 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendation's Table 9 presents 1994-95 Hermosa Beach financial data for the current parking system. Although there are a number of unknown factors, we will make some assumptions to estimate "apples to apples" changes to revenues and expenditures based on recommendations above. Revenue Assumptions Rounded Double All City Meter Rates Estimates 1994-95 Meter Revenues = $675,000 Factor out Employees Moving from On -street Spaces (conservative estimate of 40% reduction) _ ($270,000) Conservative Estimate of Additional Meter Revenue = $405,000 Increase Parking Citation Fines by 25% 1994-95 Fine Revenue = $917,000 25% increase yields an additional $229,000 = $1,146,00 Factor out 15% reduction in number of citations written due to more available off-street parking, fewer violations Conservative Estimate of Additional Fine Revenue Off -Street Parking Revenue 1995-95 Off -Street Revenue, Lots A -C, Allright Parking Projected increase in Off-street Parking Revenues due to More Employee Parking (+10%) Projected increase in Parking Demand Revenues from Proposed Development, Conservative Projection (+15%) Projected Decrease in Off -Street Revenues due to Reducing Maximum Rate from $12 to $6 Year Round Conservative Projection (-25%) Net Decrease in Off -Street Revenues, Existing Lots Expenditure Assumptions Create Parking Department Director Salary plus Benefits = $63,000 Support Staff Salary plus Benefits = $31,000 0 = ($172,000) = $57,000 - $400,000 - $40,000 - $60,000 = ($125,000) = ($25,000) Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 33 Table 9 Hermosa Beach Parking System Financial Summary, 1994-95 1994-95 Actuals Revenues Parking Meters $676,512 Parking Tickets $917,943 Parking Permits: Annual $220,548 Other Permits $4,224 Sale of Real Prop $2,234 Use of Money/Prop. $14,576 Total Revenues $1,836,037 Expenditures Enforcement Personal Services $504,535 Contract Services $1,576 Materials/Supplies $87,424 Depreciation $13,666 Equipment Subtotal, Enforcement $607,201 Cashiers Personal Services $219,673 Contract Services $1,716 Materials/Supplies $27,624 Depreciation $95 Equipment Subtotal, Cashiers $249,108 Total Expenditures $856,309 Revenues Less Expenditures $979,728 Source: City of Hermosa Beach Finance Department 34 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendationd Off -Street Expenditures Current Data Not Available from Allright Parking Parking Structure Revenues and Expenditures Annual Operating Expenditures = 400 spaces x $300/space = $120,000 Conservative Estimate of Additional Revenues (December closed) = $485,000 Less Estimated Revenues from Lot C = ($150,000) Net Revenue Gain from Proposed Structure = $215,000 The assumptions above are used preparing the financial summary shown in Table 10. Again, this information is extremely conceptual, and is presented to better illustrate the implications relative to the pricing strategies component of our recommendations. Obviously, actual changes in revenues or expenditures would depend on a number of internal decisions and external factors. Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations 35 Table 10: Proposed Changes and Potential Financial Impacts to Parking System, Assumes Planned Development is Completed 1994-95 Proposed Financial Variable Actuals Change Assumption Impact Revenues Meter $676,512 Double No Negative +$405,000 Revenue Meter Rates impact on Short- term Meter Use Loss of Employee Street Parking Fine Revenue $917,943 Increase Some Reduction +$57,000 Average in # of Citations, Fines by but not full 25% 25% drop Off -Street $399,239 Alter Fee Potential Increase ($25,000) Parking Structure, in Use but Some Revenue(1) Decrease Lost Revenue Daily Max. Due to Lower Rates Expenditures Create $856,309 Hire Additional Budget +$94,000 Parking Director Provided for PR, Personnel, Department plus Parking Support +$50,000 Support Other Costs Staff Off -Street Parking Expenditures N/A Current Allright Parking operation is Breakeven $0 New Parking Structure Expenditures N/A $300/Space Annual Operating Expenditures $120,000 Gross Revenues Less Estimated Current Revenue, Lot C See Appendix C $485,000 ($150,000) Net Annual Return, Parking Structure $215,000 Cumulative Increase to Parking System Finances $508,000 (1) From Allright Parking Financial Records Other factors which will impact these assumptions include the proposed new development for downtown Hermosa Beach, and City decisions related to managing the new parking structure. The supply/demand phase of our parking study projected approximately 36 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking Management and Control Recommendations a 17 % increase in peak parking demand based on proposed new development. Much of this demand for parking will be met by the new parking structure. At the same time, operating costs for the structure, as well as current operating expenditures for Allright Parking, are not known. For purposes of this analysis, we assume that Allright Parking's operation has been breaking even, so no net change is shown. The total change to revenues and expenditures totals $315,000 in additional funding to the parking system. The biggest single revenue increase is due to the doubling of on -street meter rates. The largest expenditure item is the creation of a centralized parking department. Conclusions Hermosa Beach now has an effective parking system, and revenues from parking permits and fines are contributing substantially to the City's budget. However, we believe that several improvements could streamline parking procedures for the City, ease parking shortages in the downtown, improve the parking system's image, and better position the City to assume off-street parking management. Major recommendations for the City of Hermosa Beach include: • Form one City Parking Department with responsibility for all on- and off-street parking. • Hire a parking professional to manage the parking department. • Develop measurable parking goals for the City. • Simplify and better communicate parking rates, time limits, and enforcement. • Most importantly, use pricing strategies to encourage appropriate user groups. le .s, ,xy.;,:r. s.��ti -' `+(.:',-:;--'-w'F'w •..,vim,:..+--.re,r.:a:.:..stt. :e�, �...v..=;, vh • • • • • BY TRACY FELLIN SAVIDGE AC UIRIN THE PR�ESSIO�AL EkE • tw • • - . Parking professionals in all types of businesses are find- ing that a continuing education offers clear advantages in meeting today's industry challenges. 28 The Parking Professional November 1995 From downsizing and budget crunches to pressure to keep up with new government regulations and changing customer needs, parking industry professionals are facing increasingly diverse—and often complex—issues on the job. In fact, even many long-time indus- try veterans concede that their col- lege educations and job experience sometimes fall short in helping them effectively deal with the demands of the parking profession of the '90s. That's where the CAPP program comes in. CAPP, which stands for Certified Administrator of Public Parking, is a professional certifica- tion program developed by the Inter- national Parking Institute (IPI) in cooperation with the University of Virginia. (For details, see sidebar.) Through intensive parking -specific coursework, including several multi - day classes held at various sites around the country, the program, according to its graduates and cur- rent participants, offers parking pro- fessionals an unequaled opportunity to fill the gaps in their formal educa- tion, freshen skills, stay abreast of new issues and trends in the parking industry, and, perhaps most impor- tantly, forge new professional bonds with colleagues nationwide. As an added bonus, program grads say, earning the CAPP designation ele- vates their status in the profession, opening doors to greater career advancement and recognition. And Hultine says she will undoubtedly call upon her CAPP experience and network as she faces future workplace challenges. "In our long-range plans we're talking about building new parking or doing remote parking with shut- tles," she says. "That list of people [from CAPP] will be invaluable to me, because I know they'll be able to tell me how their systems are working—and they'll tell me truth- fully." A LOOk TOWARD TIE RITE Judy Fulton is another current CAPP program participant who is looking toward the day she can better use CAPP training and net- working on the job. Fulton, a finan- cial officer with the Camden, New Jersey, City Parking Authority, has been forced to temporarily put her program partici- pation on hold while she works through the city's current financial crisis. Fulton's department, which once operated as an autonomous branch of the city government, is now managed by the state of New Jersey. As part of the reorganization, her 30 -person staff has been reduced to six, and she's grappling with an expanded workload and responsibilities in managing the finances of a depart- ment which oversees operations for two garages, 12 surface lots, 1,300 on -street metered spaces, and a residential parking program. Still, Fulton sees positive change on the horizon, noting that the City of Camden, situated one mile east of Philadelphia and 55 miles from Atlantic City, has been Fulton well-positioned for revitalization through the recent opening of the Sony -Pace Amphitheater and other new commercial ventures. 'The future of the City of Cam- den looks bright," she says, "and parking is a very important aspect to its development....My intentions are to finish [the CAPP] course, even at my own expense, because the more knowledge I can bring to aid this development, the more successful we'll be." The CAPP program, says Ful- ton, who earned a business man- agement degree from Camden's Rutgers University, is an important part of any parking professional's continuing education. "What I learned in school doesn't work any more," she asserts. "And, while you can read a million books, you still need one- on-one contact with instructors and colleagues." ■ Tracy Fellin Savidge is a freelance writer in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. The Certified Administrator of Public Parking (CAPP) pro- gram, launched in 1992, is a professional certification pro- gram developed by the Interna- tional Parking Institute (IPI) in cooperation with the University of Virginia (UVA). Its mission is three -fold: 1. To provide continuous information and training to park- ing professions; 2. To increase the body of knowledge available to parking professionals and establish a benchmark of excellence for the profession; and 3. To provide a means by which parking professionals may demonstrate their profi- ciency and be recognized by their peers. The CAPP program includes more than six parking - specific courses—approved and officially recognized by UVA—which are conducted over a two-year period. To com- plete the program—and earn the CAPP designation—candi- dates may choose from a vari- ety of five- and two-day cours- es, typically held in conjunction with IPI conferences and semi- nars, to earn points toward cer- tification. Candidates successfully completing coursework and other program requirements become eligible to sit for the CAPP examination. CAPP certi- fication is valid for three years. For more information on the CAPP program, its benefits and requirements, contact the International Parking Institute, P.O. Box 7167, Fredericksburg, VA 22303; phone (540) 371- 7535; fax (540) 371-8022. The Parking Professional November 1995 33 L t: r • • • [!ti._ 4^ ^.C^iff.-74 ... .zacer.`-.✓ .'.ti�sYaetr, vT- .... J-, _ _• 1. Code Section CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Finance Cashier Department Vio!ations Listing Fine Description 01 19-61 HBMC 02 19-77 HBMC 03 19-78 HBMC 04 19-78.1 HBMC 05 19-88R HBMC 06 19-88 HBMC 07 19-65 HBMC 08 4000(A) CVC 09 5200 CVC 100 19-61 HBMC 101 19-61 HBMC 102 19-61 HBMC 103 19-61 HBMC 104 19-61' HBMC 105 19-61 HBMC 106 19-61 HBMC 107 19-61 HBMC 108 19-61 HBMC 109 19-61 HBMC 11 22502 CVC 110 19-61 HBMC 111 19-61 HBMC 112 19-61 HBMC 113 19-61 HBMC 114 19-61 HBMC 115 19-61 HBMC 20.00 NO PARKING ZONE 20.00 TIME LIMIT PARKING 17.00 PKG SPACE MARKINGS 20.00 NO. OF VEH PER STALL 22.00 RED ZONE 17.00 YELLOW OR WHITE ZONE 20.00 PKD OVER 72 HOURS 52.00 REG REQUIRED 76.00 DISPLAY OF PLATES 20.00 NO PKG MON 7am-9am 20.00 NO PKG MON 8am-llam 20.00 NO PKG MON 8am-12acn 20.00 NO PKG MON 10am-2pm '.0.00 NO PKG MON 8am-9am >_0.00 NO PKG TUES 8am-llam 20.00 NO PKG TUES 8am-12pm 20.00 NO PKG TUES l0am-2pm 20.00 NO PKG WED 6:30-7:30 20.00 NO PKG WED.8am-llam 25.00 CURB PARKING 20.00 NO PKG WED 8am-12pm 20.00 NO PKG WED l0am-2pm 20.00 NO PKG WED 8am-9am 20.00 NO PKG WED 9am-11am 20.00 NO PKG EX WED 8-12 20.00 NO PKG EX WED 10-2 / 28 1995 3:10 PM Page 1 Code Section CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Finance Cashier Department Violations Listing Fine Description 116 19-61 HBMC 117 19-61 HBMC 118 19-61 HBMC 119 19-61 HBMC 12 22514 CVC 120 19-61 HBMC 121 19-61 HBMC 122 19-61 HBMC 123 19-61 HBMC 124 19-61 HBMC 125 19-61 HBMC 126 19-61 HBMC 127 19-61B HBMC 128 19-62 HBMC 129 19-62 HBMC 13 19-9 HBMC 130 19-61 HBMC 131 22500F CVC 132 19-77 HBMC 133 19-77 HBMC 134 19-77 HBMC 135 19-77 HBMC 136 19-77 HBMC 137 19-61 15 19-69 HBMC 17 19-80 HBMC 20.00 NO PKG THU 8am-llam 20.00 NO PKG THU 8am-12pm 20.00 NO PKG THU l0am-2pm 20.00 NO PKG THU 8am-9am 30.00 FIRE HYDRANT 20.00 NO PKG EX THU 10-2 20.00 NO PKG EX THU 8-12 20.00 NO PKG FRI 6:30-7:30 20.00 NO PKG FRI 7am-8am 20.00 NO PKG FRI9:30-11:30 20.00 NO PKG FRI 8am-llam 20.00 NO PKG FRI 8am-12pm 20.00 NO PKG ON PARKWAY 20.00 NO STOPING M -F 3-7pm 20.00 NO STOP M -F 6:30-9am 20.00 PRIVATE PROPERTY 20.00 PK AJCNT TO SCHOOL 30.00 PARKED ON SIDEWALK 0.00 EXP METER YL POST 20.00 EXP METER SL POST 20.00 TIME LIMIT 1 HOUR 20.00 TIME LIMIT 2 HOUR 20.00 TIME LIMIT 6 HOUR 20.00 NO PARKING EXCEPT 8AM-12PM TUES 17.00 PKG ON NARROW ST 17.00 CITY PROP W/O PERMIT NOV 28 1995 3:10 PM Page 2 Code Section CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Finance Cashier Department Violations Listing Fine Description 18 19-92 HBMC 22 19-12 HBMC 23 19-62 HBMC 24 19-63 HBMC 25 19-75.1 HBMC 28 19-95 HBMC 29 19-102 HBMC 34 19-7 HBMC 37 19-11 HBMC 44 19-44-HBMC 52 19-66 HBMC 53 19-67 HBMC 58 19-21 HBMC 64 19-30 'HBMC 65 19-64 HBMC 66 19-76 HBMC 68 19-101 HBMC 69 19.75.2 HBMC 70 19-61H HBMC 74 4152.5 CVC 75 22500(A) CVC 76 22500(B) CVC 77 22500(C) CVC 78 22500(D) CVC 79 22500(E) CVC 80 22500(F) CVC 17.00 STOPPED IN ALLEY 20.00 REPAIRING VEH ON ST 20.00 NO STOPPING ZONE 20.00 LFT SIDE OF 1 WAY ST 20.00 COMM VEN IN RES DIST 20.00 VEH FOR HIRE ONLY 20.00 INJURING METERS 20.00 DRIVING ON SIDEWALK 20.00 WASH/POL VEH ON ST 20.00 POSTED ONE WAY ST. 20.00 PKD FOR DEMOSTRATING 20.00 WHEELS TURNED / HILL 28.00 30.00 INTERFERE W/OFFICER 17.00 ANGLE PARKING 17.00 GREEN ZONE 20.00 TIME LIMIT MTR STALL 20.00 DETACHED TRAILER 20.00 TRAFFIC HAZARD 22.00 EXP OUT OF STATE REG 30.00 NO PKG IN INTRSCTN 30.00 NO PKG ON CROSSWALK 30.00 NO PKG SAFETY ZONE 30.00 NO PKG NEAR FIRE STN 30.00 BLOCKING DRIVEWAY 30.00 BLOCKING SIDEWALK J 28 1995 3:10 PM Page 3 Code Section CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Finance Cashier Department Violations Listing Fine Description 81 22500(G) CVC 82 22500(H) CVC 83 22500(I) CVC 86 22507.8 CVC 87 5204 CVC 91 27155 CVC 93 22515 CVC 94 22522 CVC 96 5201 CVC 97 22500.1 CVC 98 22500(L) CVC 99 21211(B) CVC 90 violation codes in file. 30.00 PKD BLOCKING TRAFFIC 30.00 DOUBLE PARKED 250.00 NO PKG BUS ZONE 330.00 HANDICAP ZONE 76.00 DISPLAY OF TABS 30.00 FUEL TANK CAP 25.00 UNATTENDED VEH 275.00 SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMP 76.00 POSITIONING OF PLATE 55.00 FIRE LANE 250.00 BLKNG WHEELCHAIR ACC 25.00 BLOCKING BIKE PATH NOV 28 1995 3:10 PM Page 4 o. l • • 4 S y a _- _ APPENDIX C Potential Additional Expenditures and Revenues From Proposed Parking Structure Hermosa Beach, California New Spaces Expenditures Annual Operating $/space Total Operating Cost Revenues 400 $300 $120,000 All Friday/Saturday nights Ave. Stay 2 hrs. Turnover 1.5 2 hour fee 2 100% occupancy 400 Weeks per year 48 Days per week 2 Total Friday/Sat. night $115,200 Sunday/Thursday nights Ave. Stay 2 hrs. Turnover 1 2 hour fee $2 50% occupancy 200 Weeks per year 48 Days per week 5 Total Sunday/Thurs. night $96,000 Turnover Sat/Sunday Day (Sept. to April) Ave. Stay 4 hrs. Ave. Stay 2 hrs. Turnover 1.5 Turnover 1.5 4 hour fee $4 2 hour fee $2 50% occupancy 200 25% occupancy 100 Weeks per year 16 Weeks per year 32 Days per week 2 Days per week 2 Total Sat/Sunday Day $38,400 Total Sat/Sunday Day $19,200 Monday/Friday Day Ave. Stay 6 Turnover 1 6 hour fee $5 25% occupancy 100 Weeks per year 48 Days per week 5 Total Monday/Friday Day $120,000 Total Potential Revenues $484,800 Less Current Lot C Revenues ($150,000) Net Revenues $334,800 Less Expenses $214,800 02/19/96 FI NAI NFO.WK4 ✓...u.Jr��.:. •.ti-'�.- ar..�,lr'�JrR 4at�-�_: _. • a • • { a.. _ jf�i/. ...�v�' ri :,,fir i�"�Y°�•^ .1-•t M-.cfY .�Jr`�J�r. 'r •! r\.f.� Z • _'L .(i X1'1•-'�5.�...�'A�' Exhibit 1 PARKING DIRECTOR GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Parking Department Director heads the Hermosa Beach Parking Department. The position entails total responsibility for all financial and operational activities, including the development and maintenance of parking programs and systems. ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Correspondence - Generates, responds, determines proper filing and disseminations. 2. Provides an activity report to the City Council on a quarterly basis or as requested. 3. Issues, develops and supervises public bids related to parking equipment, parking facility construction or maintenance, and contracted services. 4. Attendance at all Council Meetings. 5. Determines job functions and descriptions of parking related functions, such as enforcement officers, cashiers and maintenance staff, and supervises hiring. 6. Directly supervises an Executive Assistant or Secretary. 7. Directs the management of all financial activities and internal controls relative to parking. 8. Supervises the proper accounting of revenues from public lots and meters. 9. Directs the management of all property maintenance programs relative to parking. 10. Directs the management of all enforcement programs. 11. Directs the management of all cashier and monthly parking facilities. 12. Directs the management of the support staff. 13. Directs the management of all on -street parking programs. 14. Indirectly supervises all office staff, booth attendants, enforcement staff, property and meter maintenance staffs. 15. Reviews all vouchers. 16. Prepares agendas for Special and Regular meetings of the Downtown Enhancement Commission. 17. Promotes public relations with community. 18. Acts as spokesperson for Parking Department. 19. Works with other Council committees as required. Exhibit 1 (Cont'd) PARKING DIRECTOR Page 2 20. Performs on-site visits to all facilities as needed. 21. Performs any and all other activities as directed by the Council, Mayor, or City Manager. 22. Indirectly supervises vehicle and equipment maintenance. 23. Directs special projects. ON -STREET PARKING RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Directs management of total program. 2. Promotes new meter installations. 3. Indirectly supervises meter maintenance and collections. 4. Indirectly supervises Enforcement Officers. OFF-STREET PARKING RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Directs management of total program. 2. Indirectly supervises the assignment of personnel. 3. Promotes facility development. 4. Directs management of facility revenue collection and control. 5. Indirectly supervises the training of Booth Attendants. 6. Initiates necessary maintenance contract. ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Directs management of total program. 2. Directs program development. 3. Identifies enforcement priorities. 4. Indirectly supervises towing program. 5. Indirectly supervises training of Enforcement Staff. 6. Indirectly supervises Resident Permit Parking Program and Downtown Parking Validation Program. 7. Indirectly supervises Enforcement Zone assignments. Exhibit 1 (Cont'd) PARKING DIRECTOR Page 3 APTITUDES Verbal ability - to communicate with Commissioners, the media, other professionals and clients of the Authority. CONTACTS Internal - Extensive with managers, other City departments. External - Considerable with pubic, City officials, professionals and media. EDUCATION, KNOWLEDGE AND TRAINING Bachelors degree from an accredited college, preferably with a degree in business management, public administration or finance. EXPERIENCE Five to ten years of managerial experience. SUPERVISED BY: City Manager SUPERVISES: Executive Assistant or Secretary PROMOTION FROM: Financial Manager, Property Manager Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Circulation Section DRAFT REPORT Submitted to City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department Submitted by: 11" Korve Engineering February 14, 1996 Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report Table of Contents Introduction 1 1.0 Existing Conditions Analysis 1 2.0 Future Base Conditions 2 3.0 Future Alternatives Analysis 7 3.1 Proposed New Development 7 3.2 Future Conditions with Lower Pier One -Way 11 3.2.1 Without New Development 11 3.2.2 With New Development 11 3.2.3 Recommended Mitigations 17 3.3 Future Conditions with Lower Pier One -Way and Upper Pier Reduced to Two Lanes 17 3.3.1 Without New Development 17 3.3.2 With New Development 17 3.3.3 Recommended Mitigations 21 3.4 Future Condition With Lower Pier Avenue Closed and Lane Reduction on Upper Pier. .21 3.4.1 Without New Development 21 3.4.2 With New Development 21 3.4.3 Recommended Mitigations 25 4.0 Overall Circulation Issues 25 4.1 Hotel and Parking Structure Circulation Issues 25 4.2 Pedestrian Circulation 25 4.3 Delivery Vehicles 27 4.4 Reductions in On -Street Parking 28 4.5 Realignment Options for Upper Pier 28 Korve Engineering, Inc. February 14, 1995 Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report 4.6 Comments on Preferred Altemative Roadway Widths for Upper and Lower Pier 30 4.7 Transition from Two Lane to One Lane on Pier Avenue & the Effect on Street Parking 31 5.0 Overall Conclusions and Recommendations 31 Appendix 33 Korve Engineering, Inc. February 14, 1995 Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Paridng Initial Study Draft Report List of Tables Table 1.1 Existing Conditions LOS 4 Table 2.1 Future Base Intersection LOS 5 Table 3.1 Trip Generation 1 p Table 3.2 Future with One -Way Lower Pier - Intersection LOS Without New Development 14 Table 3.3 Future with One -Way Lower Pier and Reduced Lanes Upper Pier - Intersection LOS With and Without New Development 18 Table 3.4 Future With Lower Pier Closure Without New Development - Intersection LOS 22 Korve Engineering, Inc. February 14, 1995 Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report List of Figures Figure 1.1 - Existing Conditions Intersection LOS 3 Figure 2.1 - Future Base Intersection LOS 6 Figure 3.1 - Future Roadway Circulation Assumptions 8 Figure 3.2 - Site locations of related development 9 Figure 3.3 - Site locations of related development 12 Figure 3.4 - Trip Distribution for the remainder of the projects 13 Figure 3.5 - Future with One -Way Lower Pier - Intersection LOS Without New Development 15 Figure 3.6 - Future with One -Way Lower Pier- Intersection LOS With New Development 16 Figure 3.7 - Future with One -Way Lower Pier and Reduced Lanes Upper Pier- Intersection LOS Without New Development 19 Figure 3.8 - Future with One -Way Lower Pier and Reduced Lanes Upper Pier- Intersection LOS With New Development 20 Figure 3.9 - Future With Lower Pier Closure Without New Development - Intersection LOS 23 Figure 3.10 - Future With Lower Pier Closure With New Development - Intersection LOS 24 Figure 3.11 - Hotel and Delivery Access 26 Figure 3.12 - Proposed delivery zone and truck parking 29 Figure 3.13 -- Possible Taper section at PierNalley 32 Korve Engineering, Inc. February 14, 1995 Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report Introduction This report documents an analysis of the circulation and parking impacts of the Downtown Implementation Plan completed by IBI for the City of Hermosa Beach. There are two elements to the analysis, Traffic and Circulation, and Parking. Although these elements are presented in separate chapters of the report, there are areas of overlap where, for example, the circulation system proposed has an impact on the parking supply. These areas are discussed in the appropriate sections of the report. The IBI study for the Downtown Implementation Plan presented several altematives. Of these the "Preferred Alternative" based on Concept B has been specifically examined in this study. In addition, the effects of the temporary closure of Lower Pier Avenue have been evaluated to determine the impacts this might have on the circulation system. A range of "related" projects have also been studied. These are development projects which are anticipated to be in use at the time of the proposed implementation of the one-way operation on Lower Pier Avenue and the conversion of Upper Pier to one lane each way from its current two lane each way configuration. These projects include a proposed hotel adjacent to Beach Drive between 14th Street and 14th Court as well as a parking structure on the site of the existing lot between 14th Court and 13th Street. The following sections describe in detail the analysis undertaken and the results of this analysis. Traffic and Circulation 1.0 Existing Conditions Analysis This section describes existing operating conditions at the study intersections in the study area. It includes results based on new traffic counts taken in the beginning of November 1995. After consultation with City staff, KORVE collected traffic count information for the following study intersections: • Pier Avenue/Ardmore Avenue (Stop Signs) • Pier AvenueNalley Drive (Stop Signs) • Pier Avenue/Monterey Boulevard (Stop Signs) • Pier Avenue/Manhattan Avenue (staggered intersection) (Stop Signs) • Pier Avenue/Hermosa Avenue (Signalized) • Pier Avenue/Beach Drive (Stop Signs) • Beach Drive/11th Street (Stop Signs) • Beach Drive/13th Street (Stop Signs) • Beach Drive/14th Street (Stop Signs) • Hermosa Avenue/11th Street (Signalized) • Hermosa Avenue/13th Street (Signalized) • Hermosa Avenue/14th Street (Signalized) Korve Engineering, Inc. 1 February 14, 1995 Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report The location of the study intersections is shown in Figure 1.1. The count data were augmented with field survey data which verified the geometric information for each intersection. The counts were taken on a Thursday PM peak period (4:OOPM - 6:OOPM) and a Saturday Peak period (7:00 PM - 9:00 PM). These represent the two analysis periods adopted for the traffic and circulation section. These counts, however, do not represent the peak period for the season - this being the summer. Consequently, KORVE studied counts from previous years where both summer and fall counts were available so that an adjustment factor could be developed to apply to the current 1995 November counts. This factor was determined to be 1.15. The methodology for deriving this factor is summarized in tabular form in the Appendix to this report. The adjusted traffic count data were entered into the TRAFFIX model and analyzed to determine the level of service (LOS) and volume/capacity ratios (V/C) or delay (in seconds) for each intersection. For unsignalized intersections, LOS and delay (in seconds) are shown because overall V/C would not adequately show a problem if one exists. Unsignalized movements with an apparently low V/C may experience significant delay. For signalized intersections, LOS and V/C is shown for overall intersection operation. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 1.1 and also in Figure 1.1. As can be seen from the table most of the intersections operate acceptably well (LOS D or better) in both periods. The exceptions are at Valley/Ardmore intersections with Pier Avenue which are currently under stop sign control. These intersections are located close to each other and show a weekday PM peak LOS of E. As part of this analysis these intersections were selected for specific signal warrant analysis to determine if they should be signalized. The results of this signal warrant analysis showed that existing conditions at these two intersections currently meet the peak hour volume warrant for installing a traffic signal. Signalization would improve the weekday PM peak period LOS to C at each of these intersections. 2.0 Future Base Conditions After consultation with City staff, a future analysis date of 2000 was established. An annual growth factor of one percent per year was applied to the 1995 counts to simulate the ambient growth in traffic to the year 2000. This factor was also agreed upon following consultation with City staff. The TRAFFIX analysis was re -run for the future base conditions assuming the existing development and existing roadway configuration. This scenario provides a background condition against which to compare the various altematives analyzed as part of this study. The results of the future -base conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 2.1. Figure 2.1 shows the results in a graphic format. As can be seen from the table most of the study intersections are operating at acceptable levels in the Future Base Condition. The exceptions are, as in the Existing Condition, Pier/Ardmore and PierNalley. Korve Engineering, Inc. 2 February 14, 1995 W Korve I Engineering LEGEND Unsignalized Study Intersection Signalized Study Intersection Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 1.1 Existing (1995) Intersection LOS Table 1.1 Intersection Level of Service in the Existing (1995) Condition Stop Controlled Intersections Existing (1995) Thursday PM Peak Saturday PM Peak LOS E E C Delay (seconds) 33.6 39.7 15.0 LOS • C D C Delay (seconds) 19.3 22.5 18.4 Pier/Ardmore PierNalley Pier/Monterey Pier/Manhattan (east) A 1.6 A 1.7 Pier/Manhattan (west) A 0.4 A 0.5 Pier/Beach A 1.8 A 1.7 11 th/Beach A 1.5 A 1.6 14th/Beach A 2.2 A 2.4 13th/Beach A 2.5 A 2.3 Signalized Intersections LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio Pier/Hermosa A 0.39 A 0.52 11 th/Hermosa A 0.33 A 0.37 13th/Hermosa A 0.30 A 0.36 14th/Hermosa A 0.38 A 0.38 Intersection Levels of Service with Signals Added Pier/Ardmore C 0.73 B 0.61 PierNalley C 0.77 A 0.57 - Meets signal warrants. 02/14/96 c11 netarl hermosa UotusUos WL wk4 Table 2.1 Intersection Level of Service in the Future Base Condition (2000) Existing Roadway System Stop Controlled Intersections Existing (1995) Future Base (2000) Thursday PM Peak Saturday PM Peak Thursday PM Peak Saturday PM Peak LOS E E C Delay seconds) 33.6 39.7 15.0 LOS C D C Delay seconds 19.3 22.5 18.4 LOS E F C Delay seconds 39.4 47.1 17.0 LOS D D D Delay seconds 22.1 25.8 20.9 Pier/Ardmore PierNalley Pier/Monterey Pier/Manhattan (east) A 1.6 A 1.7 A 1.7 A 1.9 Pier/Manhattan (west) A 0.4 A 0.5 A 0.4 A 0.5 Pier/Beach A 1.8 A 1.7 A 1.8 A 1.7 11 th/Beach A 1.5 A 1.6 A 1.5 A 1.6 14th/Beach A 2.2 A 2.4 A 2.2 A 2.4 13th/Beach A 2.5 A 2.3 A 2.5 A 2.3 Signalized Intersections LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio Pier/Hermosa A 0.39 A 0.52 A . 0.40 A 0.54 11th/Hermosa A 0.33 A 0.37 A 0.34 A 0.38 13th/Hermosa A 0.30 A 0.36 A 0.31 A 0.37 14th/Hermosa A 0.38 A 0.38 A 0.39 A 0.39 Intersection Levels of Service with Signals Added Pier/Ardmore C 0.73 B 0.61 C 0.76 B 0.64 PierNaliey C 0.77 A 0.57 D 0.80 A 0.59 -- Meets signal warrants. 02/14/96 c: l lnetaf he/mosa llotuslloslbl. wk4 1� Korve 1 Engineering C/B LEGEND • Unsignalized Study Intersection O Signalized Study Intersection A/A Thur PM/Sat PM LOS 0 a a a E Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 2.1 Future Base (2000) Intersection LOS Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report 3.0 Future Alternatives Analysis The following scenarios were analyzed both with and without the proposed new development for the year 2000: • Future Conditions with Lower Pier One -Way. • Future Conditions with Lower Pier One -Way and lane reduction on Upper Pier. • Future Conditions with Lower Pier closed and lane reduction on Upper Pier. Each is discussed in detail below. For those alternatives which include the conversion of Lower Pier to one-way operation a number of other network assumptions were made. These included converting segments of Beach Drive to one-way operation to facilitate circulation, and also the opening of some of the existing alleyways to, primarily, delivery vehicles. This assumed roadway system was discussed with City staff and is the result of this discussion and analysis. In addition, because the intersections of PierNalley and Pier/Ardmore warrant the installation of signals in the Existing Condition, it has been assumed that signals have been installed in each of the future alternatives. Figure 3.1 illustrates the nature of these assumptions which are generally applied in all the future scenarios. Where there are differences between the existing roadway system and the assumed roadway system, these have been highlighted in the appropriate sections of text. 3.1 Proposed New Development A number of related projects are proposed for 13 sites in the downtown area and are expected to be completed by the year 2000. These new developments are summarized in Table 3.1 and their sites are shown in Figure 3.2. Trip Generation The developments were quantified after discussions with City staff and the associated trip generation for each for both a weekday peak and a Saturday peak were assessed using the ITE Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition). A passer-by trip reduction percentage of 10% was applied to those uses which might experience this kind of trip pattern. This percentage was lower than is quoted in the ITE manual for sample uses but reflects a conservative approach to the analysis. The percentage also assumes some reduction in trips because of the unusual nature of the City - a beach community with a higher -than -average pedestrian and bike trip making pattern. The overall assumption was discussed with City staff. The proposed 97 -room hotel (Map Location #9) will include 2,600 square feet of meeting rooms. It will be built in two phases of approximately 50 rooms each. The first phase will use the existing parking lot between 13th Street and 14th Court (Map Location #10). The second phase will be linked with construction of the parking structure on the site of the existing parking lot. Because it is expected that both phases will be completed by the year 2000, each of the alternatives that was analyzed assumed the presence of the entire hotel. The results of the trip generation analysis for the two study periods are summarized in Table 3.1. Negative numbers indicate existing land uses which will be replaced by new development. Korve Engineering, Inc. 7 February 14, 1995 1� Korve 1 Engineering 0 t_ Upper Pier will have one lane each way from Valley to Hermosa with widened sidewalks • LEGEND Unsignalized • Study Intersection O Signalized Study Intersection P� M ooh°' \Je 0 The indicated portions of Lower Pier and Beach Blvd. would become one—way. Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 3.1 Future Roadway Assumptions IW Korve 1 Engineering • Study Intersecton Q Related Project Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 3.2 Location of Related Projects Table 3.1 : Net Trip Generation from Proposed Development Map Location Zone # Land Use Square Footage Weekday Trips (PM Peak Hour) Saturday Trips (PM Peak Hour) in out in out 1 1 specialty retail 5,600 14 11 10 10 general office 2,800 2 11 1 1 2 2 2 specialty retail 400 1 1 1 1 restaurant 6,500 51 44 42 46 general office 10,500 6 29 3 3 3 3 3 specialty retail 6,134 16 12 11 11 general office 3,066 2 12 1 1 existing convenience 2,600 -32 -33 -40 -38 4 specialty retail 7,200 18 14 13 13 5 5 5 5 specialty retail 5,500 14 10 10 10 restaurant 6,000 47 40 39 42 existing retail 3,000 -15 -5 -5 -5 existing theater 8,500 -21 -12 -25 -15 6 restaurant 2,100 16 14 14 14 7 7 7 specialty retail 9,900 25 19 18 18 existing retail 2,800 -14 -5 -5 -5 existing apartments 7 units -4 -2 -4 -3 8 8 8 8 new restaurant 5,000 40 34 33 35 retail 10,000 25 19 18 18 existing restaurant 700 -5 -5 -5 -5 existing apartments 14 units -8 -4 -7 -6 9 resort hotel 97 rooms 27 46 37 42 10 400 car parking structure - - - - 11 parking lot/structure - -- - 12 specialty retail 3,000 7 5 5 5 13 general office 1,800 2 8 1 1 13 restaurant 4,400 35 30 29 32 13 existing medical office 3,600 -5 -11 -7 -6 TOTAL NET TRIPS 245 282 187 221 Notes: Trips to restaurants and retail reflect a 10% reduction taken for passer-by and bicycle/pedestrian trips. Numbers may not total exactly due to rounding. Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report Trip Distribution The overall distribution, both origin and destination, of trips generated by the new development was discussed with City staff. The distribution of trips to and from the proposed hotel is 20% from the north, 25% from the south and 55% from the east. This distribution is shown in Figure 3.3. The trip distribution for the remainder of the new development is 30% from the north, 35% from the south and 35% from the east. This distribution is shown in Figure 3.4. 3.2 Future Conditions with Lower Pier One -Way This alternative considered the conversion of Lower Pier Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and its termination just west of Beach Drive to one-way operation in a westbound direction. It was also assumed that Beach Drive would be one-way northbound from Pier Avenue to 13th Street, and also one-way southbound from Pier Avenue to 11th Street. These assumptions were confirmed with City staff. A final assumption made was that PierNalley and Pier/Ardmore have been signalized. 3.2.1 Without New Development A manual reassignment of the future base intersection traffic volumes was undertaken to simulate conditions with the conversion of Lower Pier to one-way operation. This alternative was examined both with and without the proposed new development. The results of the intersection analysis without the proposed new development are summarized in Table 3.2. Figure 3.5 summarizes the results in a graphic format. As can be seen from the table the conversion of Lower Pier Avenue to one-way operation results in only.minor changes from the Future Base Condition. The changes which do occur take place at study intersections on Hermosa Avenue and Beach Drive. 3.2.2 With New Development A manual reassignment of the future base intersection traffic volumes was undertaken to simulate conditions with the conversion of Lower Pier to one-way operation and the proposed new development traffic was also assigned with the one-way street in place. The results -of the analysis are summarized in Table 3.2 and Figure 3.6. As can be seen from the table, the level of service at Valley/Ardmore declines to from C to D in the weekday PM peak period. The decline in LOS at Pier/Monterey does not represent a significant impact. Due to the relatively small number of vehicles using Monterey Avenue, this intersection does not meet signal warrants. It is suggested, however, that this intersection be monitored periodically in the future to determine if this continues to be the case. The delay at this four-way stop intersection may have a safety benefit, as it slows traffic coming into the downtown area. Korve Engineering, Inc. 11 February 14, 1995 1� Korve I Engineering Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 3.3 Overall Trip Distribution for the Proposed Hotel 1� Korve 1 Engineering Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Rgure 3.4 Overall Trip Distribution for Other Related Projects Table 3.2 Intersection Level of Service with Lower Pier Avenue One Way Stop Controlled Intersections ,, Future Base (Existing Roadway System) Future Without Development Projects Future With Development Projects Thursday PM Peak Saturday PM Peak Thursday PM Peak Saturday PM Peak Thursday PM Peak SaturdayPM Peak LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) 35.9 LOS E ' Delay (seconds) 36.6 Pier/Monterey C 17.0 D 20.9 C 17.0 D 20.9 E ' Pier/Manhattan (east) A 1.7 A 1.9 A 1.8 A 2.0 A 5.9 A 5.9 Pier/Manhattan (west) A A 0.4 A 0.5 A 0.4 A 0.5 A 0.5 A 0.6 Pier/Beach A 1.8 A 1.7 A 1.2 A 1.2 A 1.2 A 1.2 11th/Beach A 1.5 A 1.6 A 3.0 A 3.5 A 3.0 A 3.5 14th/Beach A 2.2 A 2.4 A 2.4 A 2.5 A 2.3 A 2.5 13th/Beach ; A 2.5 A 2.3 A 2.4 A 2.3 A 2.4 A 2.3 Signalized Intersections LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio Pier/Ardmore " C 0.76 B 0.64 C 0.76 B 0.64 D 0.84 C 0.70 PierNalley " D 0.80 A 0.59 D 0.80 A 0.59 D 0.89 B 0.67 PlerMermosa A 0.40 A 0.54 A 0.38 A 0.53 A 0.52 B 0.63 11th/Hermosa , A 0.34 A 0.38 A 0.37 A 0.44 A 0.44 A 0.50 13th/Hermosa A 0.31 A 0.37 A 0.34 A 0.40 A 0.41 A 0.45 14th/Hermosa 1 A 0.39 A 0.39 A 0.40 A 0.42 A 0.43 A 0.44 • Does not meet signal warrants or need mitigation. See text. • The future signalization of these two Intersections Is assumed. 01/1480 o:Iln.ta .nnosaVofu$Vo$1D1.wk4 1� Korve 1 Engineering LEGEND Unsignalized Study Intersection Signalized Study Intersection Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 3.5 Future Condition with Lower Pier One -Way Without Related Development 1� Korve 1 Engineering LEGEND Unsignalized Study Intersection Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 3.6 Future Condition with Lower Pier One -Way With Related Development Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report 3.2.3 Recommended Mitigations Without New Development Because no intersections were significantly impacted under this altemative, as shown in Table 3.2, no mitigations are suggested. With New Development As can be seen from Table 3.2 no study intersections were significantly impacted under this alternative and therefore no mitigation measures are suggested. 3.3 Future Conditions with Lower Pier One -Way and Upper Pier Reduced to Two Lanes This altemative is identical to the previous one except that the lanes on Upper Pier Avenue are assumed to be reduced to one each way from the existing two each way. It was assumed that PierNalley and Pier/Ardmore have been signalized. It was also assumed that the lane reduction would not affect the intersections at Pier/Ardmore, PierNalley or Pier/Hermosa. It would affect Pier/Monterey, Pier/Manhattan (east) and Pier/Manhattan (west). The traffic impacts both with and without the new development are described below. 3.3.1 Without New Development A manual reassignment of the future base intersection traffic volumes was undertaken to simulate conditions with the conversion of Lower Pier to one-way operation. The results of the intersection analysis without the proposed new development are summarized in Table 3.3. Figure 3.7 summarizes the results in a graphic format. As can be seen from the table the conversion of Lower Pier Avenue to one-way operation results in only minor changes from the Future Base Condition. The changes which do occur are not significant. 3.3.2 With New Development A manual reassignment of the future base intersection traffic volumes was undertaken to simulate conditions with the conversion of Lower Pier to one-way operation and the proposed new development traffic was also assigned with the one-way street in place. The results of the intersection analysis with the proposed new development are summarized in Table 3.3. Figure 3.8 summarizes the results in a graphic format. As can be seen from the table the levels of service at Valley/Ardmore and Valley/Monterey decline to from C to D in the weekday PM peak period. LOS at the remainder of the study intersections does not decline under this altemative. Korve Engineering, Inc. 17 February 14, 1995 Table 3.3 Intersection Level of Service with Lower Pier Avenue One -Way & Upper Pier Avenue Reduced to Two Lanes Stop Controlled Intersections Future Base (Existing Roadway System) Future Without Development Projects Future With Development Projects Thursday PM Peak Saturday PM Peak Thursday PM Peak Saturday PM Peak Thursday PM Peak SaturdayPM Peak LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) Pier/Monterey C 17.0 D 20.9 C 16.1 C 17.9 D ' 29.3 D 27.9 Pier/Manhattan (east) A 1.7 A 1.9 A 1.7 A 1.9 B 4.4 B 4.2 Pier/Manhattan (west) A 0.4 A 0.5 A 0.5 A 0.5 A 0.5 A 0.5 Pier/Beach A 1.8 A 1.7 A 1.2 A 1.2 A 1.2 A 1.2 11 th/Beach A 1.5 A 1.6 A 3.0 A 3.5 A 3.0 A 3.5 14th/Beach A 2.2 A 2.4 A 2.4 A 2.5 A 2.3 A 2.5 13th/Beach A 2.5 A 2.3 ,„ A 2.4 A 2.3 A 2.4 A 2.2 Signalized Intersections LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio Pier/Ardmore " C 0.76 B 0.64 C 0.76 B 0.64 D 0.84 C 0.70 PierNailey " D 0.80 A 0.59 D 0.80 A 0.59 D 0.89 B 0.67 Pier/Hermosa A 0.40 A 0.54 A 0.38 A 0.53 A 0.52 B 0.63 11th/Hermosa A 0.34 A 0.38 A 0.37 A 0.44 A 0.44 A 0.50 13th/Hermosa I A 0.31 A 0.37 A 0.34 A 0.40 A 0.41 A 0.45 14th/Hermosa _ A 0.39 A 0.39 A 0.41 A 0.42 A 0.43 A 0.44 • Not a significant Impact. See text for a discussion of this intersection. • The future signalization of these two Intersections is assumed. 02/14/96 c:l inetaMennosaVoNSVostd.wk4 i� Korve I Engineering LEGEND Un sign alized Study Intersection Signalized Study Intersection Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 3.7 Future Condition with Lower Pier One -Way + Upper Pier 2 Lanes Without Related Development 1� Korve 1 Engineering Study Intersection Signalized Study Intersection Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 3.8 Future Condition with Lower Pier One -Way + Upper Pier 2 Lanes With Related Development Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report 3.3.3 Recommended Mitigations Without New Development As can be seen from Table 3.3 no intersections were significantly impacted under this alternative and therefore no mitigations are suggested. With New Development As can be seen from Table 3.3 no study intersections decline significantly under this alternative. The intersection of Monterey/Pier declines in the weekday PM peak period from C to D and the intersection was found to meet signal warrants under this alternative. However, because D is an acceptable LOS, it is not recommended that this intersection be signalized at this time. This intersection should be monitored periodically to ensure that it continues to operate acceptably. 3.4 Future Condition With Lower Pier Avenue Closed and Lane Reduction on Upper Pier This alternative considers the traffic impacts of a complete closure of Lower Pier at Hermosa Avenue, such as might occur during a special event, plus the lane reduction on Upper Pier from west of Valley Drive to east of Hermosa Avenue. As in each of the other alternatives, the intersections of PierNalley and Pier/Ardmore are assumed to be signalized. The scenario was considered both with and without the proposed new development. The effects of this alternative, described below, are very similar to those for the previous alternative. 3.4.1 Without New Development A manual reassignment of the future base intersection traffic volumes was undertaken to simulate conditions with the closure of Lower Pier Avenue in place. The results of the intersection analysis without the proposed new development are summarized in Table 3.4 and graphically in Figure 3.9. As can be seen from Table 3.4, the conversion of Lower Pier Avenue to one-way operation results in only minor changes from the Future Base Condition. The changes which do occur are not significant. 3.4.2 With New Development A manual reassignment of the future base intersection traffic volumes was undertaken to simulate conditions with the closure of Lower Pier Avenue in place. The results of the intersection analysis with the proposed new development are summarized in Table 3.4 and graphically in Figure 3.10. As can be seen from the table, the LOS at Valley/Ardmore and at Valley/Monterey decline to from C to D in the weekday PM peak period. LOS at the remainder of the study intersections does not decline under this alternative. Korve Engineering, Inc. 21 February 14, 1995 Table 3.4 Intersection Level of Service with Lower Pier Avenue Closed & Lane Reduction on Upper Pier Avenue Stop Controlled Future Base (Existing Roadway System) Future Without Development Projects Future With Development Projects Intersections Thursday PM Peak Saturday PM Peak Thursday PM Peak Saturday PM Peak Thursday PM Peak Saturday PM Peak LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) LOS Delay (seconds) Pier/Monterey C 17.0 D 20.9 C 16.1 C 17.9 D ' 29.3 D 27.9 Pier/Manhattan (east) A 1.7 A 1.9 A 1.7 B 1.9 B 4.4 B 4.2 Pier/Manhattan (west) A 0.4 A 0.5 A 0.5 A 0.5 A 0.5 A 0.5 Pier/Beach A 1.8 A 1.7 n/a 0.0 n/a 0.0 n/a 0.0 n/a 0.0 11th/Beach A 1.5 A 1.6 A 2.1 A 2.2 A 2.1 A 2.2 14th/Beach A 2.2 A 2.4 A 2.4 A 2.5 A 2.3 A 2.5 13th/Beach A 2.5 A 2.3 A 2.4 A 1.7 A 2.4 A 1.6 Signalized Intersections LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio Pier/Ardmore " C 0.76 B 0.64 C 0.76 B 0.64 D 0.84 C 0.70 PierNalley " D 0.80 A 0.59 D 0.80 A 0.59 D 0.89 B 0.67 Pier/Hermosa A 0.40 A 0.54 A 0.40 A 0.54 A 0.55 B 0.63 11th/Hermosa A 0.34 A 0.38 A 0.41 A 0.49 A 0.48 A 0.55 13th/Hermosa A 0.31 A 0.37 A 0.36 A 0.48 A 0.44 A 0.53 14th/Hermosa A 0.39 A 0.39 A 0.40 A 0.41 A 0.42 A 0.43 Not a significant impact. See text for a discussion of this intersection. ** The future signalization of these two intersections is assumed. 02/14/96 c:llnofaMomasaUotusl ostd.wk4 1� Korve 1 Engineering C/B Pve a D/A LEGEND • Unsignalized Study Intersection O Signalized Study Intersection A/A Thur PM/Sat PM LOS Nies Road Closure ,ef ey Moo C/C A/B Pie A Pqe A/A ogre aA/A a A/A A A Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 3.9 Future Condition with Lower Pier Closed + Upper Pier 2 Lanes Without Related Development 1� Korve 1 Engineering D/C LEGEND • Unsignalized Study Intersection O Signalized Study Intersection A/A Thur PM/Sat PM LOS imm Road Closure kje orr°t�°° Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 3.10 Future Condition with Lower Pier Closed + Upper Pier 2 Lanes With Related Development • Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report 3.4.3 Recommended Mitigations Without New Development As can be seen from Table 3.4 no intersections were significantly impacted under this altemative and therefore no mitigations are suggested. With New Development As can be seen from Table 3.4 no study intersections decline significantly under this altemative. The intersection of Monterey/Pier declines in the weekday PM peak period from C to D and the intersection was found to meet signal warrants under this altemative. However, because D is an acceptable LOS, it is not recommended that this intersection be signalized at this time. This intersection should be monitored periodically to ensure that it continues to operate acceptably. 4.0 Overall Circulation Issues This section contains a discussion of several specific circulation issues which relate to the Downtown Implementation Plan and the altematives considered in this study. 4.1 Hotel and Parking Structure Circulation Issues The proposed 97 -room hotel will occupy the southeast and southwest comers of 14th Street and Beach Drive. The site is shown as Map Location # 9 in Figure 3.2 above. It will be built in two phases of approximately 50 rooms each. Phase One will utilize the existing parking lot and Phase Two will utilize the proposed parking structure between 14th Court and 13th Street. The hotel will provide a passenger pick-up and drop-off area, probably near the comer of 14th Street and Beach Drive, and it is expected that much of the arriving hotel traffic will travel west on 14th Street then south on Beach Drive before tuming east on 14th Court to park. This circulation loop access configuration is shown below in Figure 3.11. The proposed 400 -space parking structure will be occupy the block between 13th Street and 14th Court and between Beach Drive and Hermosa Avenue. It will provide both ingress and egress to and from 13th Street and 14th Court. Because the intersection of 13th Street and Hermosa Avenue is signalized, it is expected that the majority of vehicles will access the parking structure from 13th Street, with the exception of hotel -related parking, as discussed above. 4.2 Pedestrian Circulation The intent of the Downtown Implementation Plan is to enhance the experience for both automobile users and pedestrians in the downtown area. This is evidenced by the wider sidewalks (15-22 feet) proposed for both Upper and Lower Pier. On Upper Pier, the reduction of a travel lane in each Korve Engineering, Inc. 25 February 14, 1995 1� Korve 1 Engineering ----zi Manhattan Ave Palm Dr Hermosa �4: Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report direction and the subsequent widening of the sidewalk is a standard traffic calming measure. These measures should significantly improve the pedestrian experience in the downtown area. In addition, it is recommended that the City pursue the pedestrian cut -through from the south side of Lower Pier to 12th Court. This would provide a more direct access from the parking lot to Pier Avenue and would provide pedestrians an altemative to the use of Beach Drive. This street is very narrow and will be used for dispersing vehicular traffic from Lower Pier when the latter becomes . one-way. Such a pedestrian cut -through would then mirror the existing facility from the north side of Pier Avenue to 13th Court. These pedestrian cut-throughs also provide a very important role with regard to deliveries. The goal of this circulation study is to encourage the use of 12th and 13th Courts as delivery zones. Under such a regime, it is highly desirable to provide direct access to Lower Pier Avenue for hand carting of deliveries to the businesses along the street. This will be discussed in more detail under the deliveries section of this report. Ultimately, it would be desirable to enhance the two Courts next to Lower Pier Avenue for pedestrian use - similarly to what has been done in many alleyways in Old Town Pasadena. These alleys can effectively function in the dual role of delivery zones and pedestrian zones. Enhanced surface treatments such as paving, as well as use of attractive lighting and planting where widths permit, can improve the look of the alleys . Under such a scenario, more of the businesses might be encouraged to provide entrances from these enhanced alleys. Since the pier is a major destination for bicycle traffic it would be desirable to provide bicycle parking racks on or near the pier itself. This would also provide parking for beach goers in the peak season. 4.3 Delivery Vehicles It is proposed that deliveries be consolidated onto 12th and 13th Court wherever possible - for the servicing of businesses on and near Lower Pier Avenue. In the case of 13th Court, this will need to be opened to delivery traffic - it is currently closed at Hermosa and is used unofficially as an extension of the adjacent parking lot. With the opening of 12th Court at Hermosa Avenue, it will no longer be available for non-delivery parking and this will result in 11 lost spaces (even though these are currently illegally parked). Both 12th and 13th Court will be right tum in and out only where they meet Hermosa Avenue. Access to and from these delivery zones is illustrated schematically in Figure 3.11. Review of building footprints and roadway geometry near each of the proposed delivery zones indicates that small delivery trucks will be able to negotiate all the intersections, as is now the case. Large delivery vehicles, those with a tuming radius of 40-42 feet, will be unable to negotiate the intersection of 12th Court/Beach Drive. This situation would be improved if Beach Drive were widened by four feet to accommodate a loading zone in the block between 11th Street and 12th Court. This would require the edge of the parking lot to be relocated and one parking space to be lost. 3.12 shows the proposed loading zone. Included in the appendix is an aerial photograph of the current configuration of this comer. The appendix also includes sketches which show the truck tuming movements which will be possible with the road widening. This delivery zone strategy is designed to limit the number of delivery vehicles waiting on Lower Pier itself, especially when Lower Pier becomes one-way. Both 12th and 13th Court should be Korve Engineering, Inc. 27 February 14, 1995 Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report maintained as two-way alleys. Signs should be placed near the entrance to Lower Pier indicating that deliveries should be made from 12th or 13th Court. The delivery zones would also effectively service businesses on both sides of Hermosa Avenue because hand trucking of materials can be accomplished across the street at the signalized intersection. This might help to minimize conflicts on Hermosa Avenue between delivery trucks and parking vehicles during some periods of the day - the trucks can now obstruct one or more on -street parking spaces when deliveries are being made. 4.4 Reductions in On -Street Parking The elements of the Downtown Implementation Plan studied in this report involve a 54 -space reduction in the supply of on -street parking spaces (although an increase in off-street spaces is provided by the new parking structure). The reconfiguration of Lower Pier to one-way operation will reduce the current supply of on -street parking from 52 spaces to 28 spaces, a net reduction of 24 spaces. The new parking structure, as proposed at the time of writing, will encroach into the existing roadway on 13th Street by 16 feet. This will result in a 20 -foot wide roadway with no room for on -street parking. This block of 13th Street currently has 18 angle parking spaces on the south side of the street which would be removed. The 29 perpendicular parking spaces on the north side of the street would be replaced by spaces within the structure. This results in a net reduction of 18 spaces. The opening of 12th Court to delivery traffic will result in the currently illegally parked vehicles being displaced. This will result in a reduction of 11 parking spaces. The tapering of the lanes on Upper Pier Avenue from two lanes to one lane, as per the Downtown Implementation Plan recommendations, will result in some on -street parking spaces being lost. The segment affected is between Valley Drive and Bard Street. Three spaces will be lost from the eastem end of the block on the north side of Pier. The three parallel parking spaces at the westem end of the block on the south side of Pier could be replaced with five angle parking spaces. If this were done it would result in a net loss of one parking space. The tapering of lanes is discussed in Section 4.7 later in this report. 4.5 Realignment Options for Upper Pier The reduction from two lanes in each direction to one on Upper Pier Avenue reduces the width of the traveled way. This suggested there may be a way to realign the travel lanes and straighten the curve on Pier Avenue. Once this issue was examined it was found that any realignment would result in the loss of a significant number of parking spaces from Pier Avenue. It was also apparent that straightening the curve might result in higher traffic speeds, particularly for westbound traffic coming into the Korve Engineering, Inc. 28 February 14, 1995 1� Korve 1 Engineering a) C a) 0 L a) O J Right turn in/out only IP!!!lkit Hermosa Avenue Southern delivery zone Possible redesign of parking lot (1 space lost) See text for details Beach Drive o 0 Possible Truck Parking Area SKETCH: Not to Scale Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 3.12 Proposed Delivery Zone and Truck Parking 4 Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report downtown area. In any event, the potential straightening was minimal at best. Based on these considerations, it is not recommended that Upper Pier Avenue be realigned. 4.6 Comments on Preferred Alternative Roadway Widths for Upper and Lower Pier The Downtown Implementation Plan prepared by the IBI Group describes preferred altematives for the reconfiguration of both Upper Pier and Lower Pier Avenue. The text and diagrams for each of these altematives allocates 15' of street space for 45 -degree angle parking. A review of the literature by KORVE indicates that this would provide insufficient space for this type of parking (Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering, 9th Ed., Homburger and Kell). The standard parking stall, which is 18' x 8.5', requires 18.7' when placed at a 45 -degree angle to the curb. The preferred altematives should be modified to reflect this requirement. It should be noted that the existing stalls on Pier Avenue also do not meet this width. Upper Pier Avenue The Downtown Implementation Plan describes the preferred altemative on Upper Pier Avenue as providing one travel lane in each direction and 45 -degree angle parking stalls. The following cross- section is indicated for each half of the roadway (100 feet): 15' sidewalks on each side, 15' angle parking stalls, 8' of maneuvering space, and single 12' travel lanes in each direction. A depth of 18.7' should be allowed for the angle parking stalls. This would leave 16.3' for the single travel lanes, including 4.3' of maneuvering space. The desired 15' sidewalks would still be possible with this change. It is felt that this would offer a safety improvement over the preferred altemative cross-section because it will allow space for only one lane of traffic in each direction on Pier Avenue (16.3'). Although the preferred altemative cross-section would be striped for only one travel lane in each direction, it would allow space for two lanes of traffic (20'). If this were implemented, motorists might be tempted to use the maneuvering area as a second travel lane, likely resulting in conflicts. Lower Pier Avenue The Downtown Implementation Plan describes the preferred altemative on Upper Pier Avenue as providing one travel lane in each direction and 45 -degree angle parking stalls. The following cross- section is indicated for the roadway (102 feet total): 22' sidewalks on each side, 15' angle parking stalls on each side, and a central 26' driveway. Right of way data suggests that only 100 feet is available. A depth of 18.7' should be allowed for the angle parking stalls. The sidewalks could be reduced to 20' each. This would leave 24.6' for two one-way lanes of 12.3' each. Korve Engineering, Inc. 30 February 14, 1995 Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report 4.7 Transition from Two Lane to One Lane on Pier Avenue & the Effect on Street Parking If Upper Pier Avenue were reduced to one travel lane in each direction, the taper needed to guide traffic would occur in the block between Bard Street and Valley Drive. A sketch of the tapered section is presented in Figure 3.13. The minimum length of the taper reduction is 115 feet. This minimum taper length applies only to a decrease in travel lanes, as is proposed for westbound traffic at this location; it does not apply to an increase in travel lanes. The tapered transition would result in the Toss of three parking spaces from the eastem end of the block on the north side of Pier. The three parallel parking spaces at the westem end of the block on the south side of Pier could be replaced with five angle parking spaces. If this were done it would result in a net loss of one parking space. 5.0 Overall Conclusions and Recommendations Of the intersections selected for analysis in this study, two four-way stop signs were found currently to warrant signalization. It is recommended that these intersections, PierNalley and Pier/Ardmore, be signalized. Pier/Monterey is a four-way stop -controlled intersection which warrants the installation of traffic signals under certain of the altematives looked at in this report. However, because this intersection continues to operate at LOS D in these altematives, which is generally considered acceptable, it is not recommended that it be signalized at this time. Instead it is recommended that this intersection be monitored periodically to ensure that it continues to operate acceptably. Korve Engineering, Inc. 31 February 14, 1995 UPPRPIER.DWG 1� Korve 1 Engineering 12' S/W 30' Valley Drive 10' Bard St Pier Avenue 15' S/W 12' .] 1 ,r I u' 1 1 1 Ll lir 18' 17' {' 12' 12' 13' t 21.3' 13' t 12' r 14' r 12' S/W 10' ----14-41. " • 20' 10' L, 31W 1&7' Angled parking could be placed in this section to provide additional spaces Hermosa Beach Circulation and Parking Study Figure 313 Possible Taper Configuration at Valley/Pier 0 • e , Hermosa Beach Downtown Circulation and Parking Initial Study Draft Report Appendix Seasonal Adjustment Factor Truck Tuming Circle Sketch at Beach Drive/12th Court Korve Engineering, Inc. February 14, 1995 Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking and Circulation Study Seasonal Traffic Variation from July to November Pier Avenue from PCH to Ardmore Avenue -- westbound July November July/November ratio 1987 count 1995 count* 1995 count Weekday 703 759 657 1.16 Weekend 627 677 578 1.17 Pier Avenue from PCH to Ardmore. Avenue -- eastbound July November July/November ratio 1987 count 1995 count* 1995 count Weekday 631 681 626 1.09 Weekend 585 632 546 1.16 Overall Average Seasonal Adjustment 1.15 * 1987 counts were growthed 1% per year to develop 1995 counts. c:11netafl iermosalseasons.wk4 12/07/95 Widen Beach Drive by 4'• to add a 10' loading zone at the western end of the parking lot. This would eliminate 1 parking space from the lot. i ,,a, \ \Y \ ao0. - PossibleT. dinV.p tQcation Beach Drive Turning Circle Sketch Redesign of Western Section of Existing Parking Lot at Beach Drive " Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council u -t-.,;. u3/ ��� sit;140 Nile sir 8aliEcas 03— March 6, 1996 Regular Meeting of March 12, 1996 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Attached Resolution Approving the Downtown Banner Program 2. Direct Staff to Proceed with the Banner Program Background: On February 13, 1996, the City Council approved a Text Amendment to allow private sponsorship of decorative street banners and directed staff to proceed with the Downtown Banner Program, specifying that staff return with the final banner design and program details. The graphic design firm Synthesis was commisioned by the Downtown Enhancement Commission to prepare a design concept, final design and specifications for the banners. Proposed Design: Synthesis has prepare a series of design concepts which were presented to the DEC for review and approval. There are five designs which provide the potential to display banners in a number of ways. A "basic" banner can be paired with a "themed" banner or the basic banners can be placed side by side to create one design. The theme banners include volleyball/sports, dining /music and arts. The banners can also vary back to front by sewing two different banners together. A theme banner including the word crossroads was also suggested as a design and marketing tool for the City . The banner design involves 4 color printing with metalic gold color used for a stylized version of the Hermosa Beach logo. The design provides a unique method for including the sponsor's name with a "tail" piece suspended from the main banner section. The intent is to provide a kinetic effect for the banner. Program Administration: Sponsors can buy one to four designs and mix and match front to back sponsorships on a pole. Less than 20% of the banner area is designated for sponsorships names. Synthesis has obtained three competitive bids to produce to install the banners and staff will return with the selected banner fabricator and contract at a subsequent City Council meeting. The total banner printing and installation price is approximately $28,500 to $30,000. The price includes installation of new banner hardware and maintenance as required. The price is based upon printing between 120 - 180 units. Synthesis has prepared promotional literature for a sponsorship packet to ensure that the program is well promoted. The anticipated price per banner set is expected to be in the range of $250 to $300. All sponsorship funds will be deposited in new revenue account for the DEC. The DEC and Chamber of Commerce will solicit participation in the Program. City staff will issue receipts for checks payable to the City of Hermosa Beach and funds will be deposited in the DEC revenue account. Once the total funds for banner printing and installation/maintenance have been collected, they will be appropriated to the DEC advertising account and the banners will be purchased from that account. The banners are anticipated to be replaced bi-annually. Sol Blume Community ld, Director evelopment Department Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Attachment: Concur: L Step urrell, City " anager Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Sponsor Packet 3. Program Outline r BANNER PROGRAM - REMAINING TASKS Task January February March April Complete Contract w/ Synthesis Municipal Code Amendment (introduction and adoption) ' Synthesis Design Work: Design Development (3 alternatives) Final Selection by D.E.C. and C.C. Pre -Production Art Sponsor Participation Solicit sponsors (letters etc. Nv/mock- of chosen design) Set up account and take in funding 4.111..up Banner Fabrication and Installation Prepare RFPAle Select Contractor Fabrication Installation IMIMMIME �� 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DOWNTOWN STREET BANNER PROGRAM PURSUANT TO SECTION 3-3.10 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, Section 3-3.10 allows the installation and maintenance of decorative, street banners on public street lampposts and similar structures in the public right-of-way in the downtown area, and allows the inclusion of the name or trademark of sponsoring commercial enterprises on the banners, and; WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on March 12, 1996, to consider a banner program as recommended by the Downtown Enhancement Commission, which includes a design prepared by `Synthesis" Marketing and Communications, and a program to solicit commercial enterprises to sponsor individual banners by payment to a Downtown Enhancement Fund revenue account to reimburse the Commission for the cost of designing, fabricating and installing the banners; and; WHEREAS, after considering the recommendation of the Downtown Enhancement Commission the City Council agrees that the proposed banner program serves the purpose of enhancing the City's civic and commercial core; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY APPROVE THE BANNER PROGRAM AS RECOMMENDED BY THE DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION, INCLUDING THE DESIGN PREPARED BY "SYNTHESIS" MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS, AND A PROGRAM TO SOLICIT COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES TO SPONSOR INDIVIDUAL BANNERS BY PAYMENT OF AN AMOUNT TO BE ESTABLISHED BY THE DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION TO OFF -SET THE CITY'S COST OF DESIGNING, FABRICATING, INSTALLING AND MAINTAINING THE BANNERS. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of , 1996, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 orown/own en2ancemen1 soonsors4o program ✓Se Cify o/Jfermosa 2eacf Down/own 6nz4ancemenf commission, in connection with the newly founded downtown merchants group, is embarking on a multi -media promotional and advertising program to encourage increased commerce, cross-selling/merchandising, visitation and good will in Hermosa Beach. The program begins with themed banners, located on Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue and in the near future The Strand. Here's how it works: Each pair of banners will be hung on one of 60 poles located on Pier Avenue, beginning at Padfic Coast Highway and ending on The Strand Banners will be 30" x 96" double -sided with one company sponsoring a front and back minimally (no special positioning requests accepted Banners wil(be constructed of 13 oz. vinyl sewn (back to back) for optimum resistance to the elements Banner will be mounted on durable banner hardware Banner sponsors will be featured for a period of six months Banner pridng, including all banner hardware, ongoing maintenance and insurance: Tribeper single, Iwo sidedSanner: .7rrceper pole (Iwo, Iwo sioreci &inners): $600 $300 Please join the spirit of Hermosa Beach and sponsor a Banner. odownfown enAancemenf sponsorsIrp program name company name address dY state, zip phone ORDER FORM I am enclosing $ for _ banners. Payment must be received by (dote?). Please include a written copy of the exact company name that is to appear on the banner. Please sign and retum this form with payment to: City of Hermosa Beach Communi y Zeoe%pmen! Deparlmen/ 1315 Valley Drive • Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Jr CanonioujetZrt OP -7161 —414 ct`/wv i MEMORANDUMt. DATE: March 11, 1996 TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Mary Rooney, Director RE: Skateboarding at South Park CC: Steve Burrell, City Manager As some of you may be aware, Public Works staff has been having an extremely difficult time "keeping -up" with the damage to furniture at the new South Park created by skateboard activity. Specifically, parking stops and the entryway bollard have been detached and used as ramp devices. The seating areas have been waxed and used for jumps. Public Works staff has spent an estimated 50-60 man-hours since the park opened just to repair and replace irrigation lines, landscaping, and furniture associated with skateboarding use. As such, Public Works staff placed "No Skateboarding" signs in the park as an interim measure to help preserve park equipment before this item is considered at the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission meeting on March 20. Currently there are ordinances in place prohibiting skateboarding on any City parking lots, on sidewalks in commercial zones and at the Pier head. Skateboarding is permitted on the Strand walkway. Clearly, the hardscape pathways have provided a new and fun recreational asset in the community for youngsters on bicycles, skaters and even skateboarders to enjoy. An unanticipated byproduct of this use has been the trick skateboarding that causes destruction to park property. At the Commission meeting, staff will request direction about how to approach this issue. On the agenda for discussion will be alternatives including: • Permitting skateboarding in the Park. • Developing a specific area/program for skateboarding. • Prohibiting skateboarding in the Park. • Prohibiting trick skateboarding in the Park. Their recommendation will be forwarded to City Council for final approval.