Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/09/96�l 61-14* 94-- 1/55 "A rumor without a leg to stand on will get around Some other way." - John Tudor AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 9, 1996 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK Julie Oakes Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER J. R. Reviczky John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Robert Benz Stephen R. Burrell John Bowler CITY ATTORNEY Sam Y. Edgerton Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PRESENTATIONS: • PRESENTATION OF CHECK FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO FirstNIGHT® PRESENTATION OF CHECK FROM '1111, HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB TO THE HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION Where there is no vision the people perish HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or orally. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet compilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agenda is developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allotted. LL In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, ifyou need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204. Please provide enough time to enable us to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. GLOSSARY Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law -or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager... The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. PROCLAMATIONS: MEDAL OF VALOR WEEK APRIL 22-26, 1996 NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK APRIL 14 - 20, 1996 NATIONAL CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH APRIL 1996 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. 2 (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on March 26, 1996; and, 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on March 26, 1996. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to ado pt resolut onl approving the application for discretionary regional"funds'for the construction of crosswalks and handicap ramps at various locations in the City. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 27, 1996. Recommendation to approve the agreement between the City of Santa Monica and the City of Hermosa Beach to form a multi-iurisidiction consortium to evaluate the effectiveness of existing practices and devices for controlling urban runoff pollutants at catch basins and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 1, 1996. (f) Recommendation to approve the use of the Community Center lawn by the Kiwanis Club to operate a Christmas tree lot for the 1996 holiday season. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1996. Recommendation to approve the IMG - International Volleyball Tournament; A Day at the Beach Triathlon - Sprint Triathlon; and Evian Volleyball Challenge 96' - Junior Tournament for the 1996 season and authorize the Mayor to sign•contracts.,Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. (h) Recommendation to approve keeping the current lease rate of $.93 sq. ft. through fiscal year 1997-98 for rooms in the Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1996. (i) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of 3/20/96. 3 (i) Recommendation to deny the following claim and refer to the City's Liability Claims Administrator. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 3, 1996. Claimant: Victor, Stephani Date of Loss: 12/19/95 Date Filed: 3/28/96 (k) Recommendation to amend the City policy with regards to posting meters and parking spaces for special events and filming with temporary No Parking signs as follows: 1) meters, parking lots and time limit spaces in the commercial and residential areas shall be posted at least 24 hours in advance; and, 2) non -metered spaces in residential areas shall be posted at least 72 hours in advance. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 3, 1996. ecommendation for Mayor to executeamendment to 95-96 Community Development Block Grant' reimbursable contract.for implementation of the project to remove architectural"bairiers to the disabled at City Hall. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. (m) Recommendation for approval to open negotiations with Aliright Cal. Inc.. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. (n) Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes from the Downtown Enhancement Commission meeting of 4/3/96. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (ORDINANCE NO. 96-1154 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM M-1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 330 AND 342 ARDMORE AVENUE AND INCLUDING 615 THIRD STREET (THE SE CORNER OF ARDMORE AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET) AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 27, 1996. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT/TAVERN, WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, INTO THE ADJACENT EXISTING RESTAURANT SPACE, AND THE ADDITION OF A 600 SQUARE FOOT ROOF SEATING AREA, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 8 PIER AVENUE, "HENNESSEY'S". Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution) sustaining the Planning Commission's approval. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NEW 6,200 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE BEER & WINE, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 844 HERMOSA AVENUE, "CALIFORNIA BEACH RESTAURANT". Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: opt resolution sustaining the Planning Commission's approval subject to conditions. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL, WITH MODIFICATIONS, OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 17,500 SQUARE FOOT MIXED OFFICE, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT BUILDING ABOVE A TWO-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER & WINE (BREWPUB), OUTSIDE SEATING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 3, 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: 1) A aopt resolution f sustaining the Planning Commission's approval of the requested Precise Development Plan subject to conditions; and, 2) Adopt resolut o ustaining the Planning Commission's approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions. 5 MUNICIPAL MATTERS CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 2, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Introduce ordin and waive further reading. 8. CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Review the agenda item submitted on February 13, 1996 regarding the Commission's recommended master plan for Clark Field parking and provide staff direction. ORDINANCE TO REPEAL OR AMEND CERTAIN OUT-OF-DATE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 27, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: rInt duce ordinan and waive further reading. 10. RELOCATION OF MULTI -WAY STOP SIGNS TO PROSPECT AVENUE AND MASSEY AVENUE FROM PROSPECT AVENUE AND HOLLOWELL AVENUE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 2, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Approve relocation and consider the removal of STOP controls on Prospect Avenue at First Street and Second Street. 11. CROSSING GUARD PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Approve appropriation of $30,000 from Prospective Expenditures to the Crossing Guard Program to fund the program for the remainder of the school year; provide general direction on the future of the Crossing Guard Program and instruct the subcommittee to report back by the May 14, 1996 City Council meeting. 12. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE/WALKSTREETS SURVEY AND ISSUES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. 6 13. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE / LOWER PIER AVENUE CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 4, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Direct staff to review and develop alternatives for City Council consideration at the April 23, 1996 meeting; 2) direct that the Pier Reconstruction subcommittee meet to provide input; and, 3) the decision on the 1BI proposal to provide design services be considered at the April 23, 1996 meeting. HERMOSA INN HOTEL EIR,CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Approve award of contract of the preparation and processing of an Environmental Impact Report in connection with the Hermosa Inn Hotel Project; 2) authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by City Attorney; 3) Authorize the Director of Community Development to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council upon completion of work; and, 4) authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes to the scope of work as necessary. 15. REQUEST FROM ROGER BACON TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF TIME BANNERS CAN BE DISPLAYED ON COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 3, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Determine whether or not you wish to initiate a change in the code to allow a longer period of time for display of banners. 16. RECOMMENDATION TO RETAIN GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND VENDOR TO COMPLETE CITY HALL FIRST FLOOR OFFICE REMODEL. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. • RECOMMENDATION: 1) Award contract to Westcon Enterprises, Inc., a General Contracting Firm, to complete the first floor office remodel for the amount of $36,579; 2) Award contract to Jules Seltzer Associates for modular walls and workstations for the amount of $79,414; 3) appropriate $92,730 of UUT funds to cover remodel project costs; and, 4) authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes as necessary commensurate with budget and 10% contingency. 17. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Review the bills and direct staff to prepare letters for the Mayor's signature indicating the City Councils' support. b. REQUEST FROM CITY OF COVINA FOR SUPPORT OF SB1977. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 3, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize letters of support for SB 1977 which would shift 1% of the state sales tax to cities and counties on the basis of population. REQUEST FROM THE AMERICAN OCEANS CAMPAIGN FOR RENEWAL OF THE OCS OIL DRILLING MORATORIUM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 26, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Determine whether or not the City Council wishes to take a position on this legislation and, if in support,�adopt the e olution and authorize the Mayor to sign le er of support' REQUEST OF METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT TO SUPPORT PROPOSED COLORADO RIVER PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 26, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Determine whether or not the City Council wishes to take a position and, if in support, authorize Mayor to sign1`e (of "support. 18. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 19. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Councilmember Bowler for consideration of a suggestion from resident Jack O'Hara for a sister city in Ireland. 8 CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on March 12, 1996. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YS002665 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT • A:VtGND9A0409reg. doc 9 • • • otl_ff/-7k, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 9, 1996, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. Q PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - `J ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENT: PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTATION OF CHECK FROM 04/ HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE To FirstNIGHT t C04, ?1)--1‘ C -C-?' IlYt PRESENTATION OF CHECK FROM HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB TO THE X!Y« HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION L7> PROCLAMATIONS: 0MEDAL OF VALOR WEEK APRIL 22-26, 1996 Mayor Oakes read the proclamation to commemorate the heroism and self-sacrafice displayed by the South Bay Police and Firefighters and to recognize the recipients of this year's awards, all past recipients of the Medal of Valor Award and to proclaim the week of April 22 - 26, 1996, as Medal of Valor Week. NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK p✓ APRIL 14-20, 1996 pv15' Mayor Oakes read the proclamation which honors the significant role that libraries play in enabling citizens to reach their full potential, urged all citizens of Hermosa Beach to participate in library activities and make use of all library City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9070 • services and proclaimed the week of April 14 - 20, 1996, as National Library Week • ®NATIONAL CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH /1 APRIL, 1996 �! Mayor Oakes read the proclamation which stated that the amount of child abuse in our country had reached epidemic proportions, stressed the importance of all citizens recognizing and helping to prevent child abuse and proclaimed the month of April, 1996, as National child Abuse Prevention Month. i t—` Z �-�' •) c PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens may also speak: (1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; (2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, (3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management of departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were ,�,., ,, J.Q-ova-•�.�•.�---,�,C-¢.�, ✓�� . ,� /2- , SLP- , ,1 `��q � �� 4 itis 1 3-7 951 At 7: P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting with item 4. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9071 • • • (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. Councilmember requests to remove items from the consent calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) and the public may comment on the Consent Calendar items that have not been removed at this time. Action: To approve the consent calendar (a) through (n), with the exception of items which were removed for discussion are shown in order for clarity: (a) Motion , second The unanimous vote. recommendations the following in item 3, but motion carried by a o one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting held on March 26, 1996; and, 2) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on March 26, 1996. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting of March 26, 1996, and the Regular Meeting of March 26, 1996, as ******** (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 6287 THROUGH 6442 INCLUSIVE. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9072 • • Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUT_IONi APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR DISCRETIONARY REGIONAL FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CROSSWALKS AND HANDICAP RAMPS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 27, 1996. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 96-51997 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF—THE—CITY COUNCILi OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUNDS UNDER SB 821 AND APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF ITS BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUND." (e) RECOMMENDATION TOCAPPROVE THE AGREEMENT; BETWEEN THE CITY el OF SANTA MONICA AND-THE—CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO FORM A MULTI-JURISIDICTION CONSORTIUM TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXISTING PRACTICES AND DEVICES FOR CONTROLLING URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTANTS AT CATCH BASINS AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 1, 1996. Supplemental Memorandum from Councilmember Benz dated April 7, 1996. 6,4/ 9 . .p --r., ) ,--- .›- A ..,---4.-P' (3(A. 1...-.) 1,--A-- This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember for separate discussion later in the meeting. Y,," ----t A. A'? /7 -----"--, ".-13 i Public Works Di ector Amirani presented the s'aff report and responded to Council questions. A-----6"" v' " .- ) r . �- 4,' -.../.,) -z-- Low` Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 0/in 1) approve the agreement between the City of Santa 0 Monica and the City of Hermosa Beach to form a multi-juridiction consortium to evaluate the effectiveness of existing practices and devices for L.. controlling urban run pollutaits at catch basins; '7age 9073 4) • 601) b- 4," an��77h ouncil Minutes 01 'authorize the Mayor Motion , second f dissenting vote of ) 11 czN 1 to sign the agreement. e motion carried, noting (f) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE USE OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER LAWN BY THE KIWANIS CLUB TO OPERATE A CHRISTMAS TREE LOT FOR THE 1996 HOLIDAY SEASON. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1996. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the ninth year of the use of the Community Center lawn by the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club to operate a Christmas Tree lot for the 1996 holiday season, with the understanding that all terms will be met and a donation will be made to the Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation of ten percent of the net profits or $1,000, whichever is greater. (g) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE IMG - INTERNATIONAL VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT; A DAY AT THE BEACH TRIATHLON - SPRINT TRIATHLON; AND EVIAN VOLLEYBALL CHALLENGE 961 - JUNIOR TOURNAMENT FOR THE 1996 SEASON AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN CCONTRACTS Memorandum from Community Resources Director -Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember for separate discussion later in the meeting. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the council on this item was: Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation Resources Advisory Commission and staff to: 1) approve the following beach events season: a) IMG - International Volleyball June 20 23, 1996, for total fees City Council Minutes 04-09-96 and Community recommendation for the 1996 Tournament for of $34,510; Page 9074 • b) A Day at the Beach Triathlon - Sprint triathlon for October 13, 1996, for total fees of $6,738; and, c) Evian Volleyball Challenge '96 - Junior Tournament for April 28, 1996, for total fees of $1,865; and, 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the contracts. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. C/" (h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE KEEPING THE CURRENT LEASE RATE OF $.93 SO. FT. THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 FOR ROOMS IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1996. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to keep the current lease rate of $.93 per square foot through fiscal year 1997-98 for rooms in the Community Center. (i) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF 3/20/96. Action: To approve the recommendation to receive and file the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission action minutes of the regular meeting of March 20, 1996. RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIM AND REFER TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 3, 1996. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to deny the following claim and refer it to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: Claimant: Victor, Stephani Date of Loss: 12/19/95 Date Filed: 3/28/96 Allegation Alleges City negligence and dangerous condition on public property contributed to personal injuries. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9075 • (k) RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND THE CITY POLICY WITH REGARDS TO POSTING METERS AND PARKING SPACES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS AND FILMING WITH TEMPORARY NO PARKING SIGNS AS FOLLOWS: 1) METERS, PARKING LOTS AND TIME LIMIT SPACES IN THE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL BE POSTED AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE; AND, 2) NON -METERED SPACES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL BE POSTED AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 3, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember for separate discussion later in the meeting. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the council on this item was: Action: To approve the staff recommendation to amend the City policy with regard to posting meters and parking spaces for special events and filming with Temporary No Parking signs as follows: 1) silver meters, parking lots and time limit spaces in the commercial and residential areas shall be posted at least 24 hours in advance; and, 2) gold meters and non -metered spaces in residential areas shall be posted at least 72 hours in advance. (1) RECOMMENDATION FOR MAYOR TO EXECUTEfAMENDMENT TO 795-96 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REIMBURSABLE(CONTRACTJ FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT TO REMOVE ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS TO THE DISABLED AT CITY HALL. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. 140, Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve the amendment to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) reimbursable contract for the implementation of the project to remove City Hall architectural barriers to the disabled; City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9076 • 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the amended contract. • • (m) RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL TO OPEN NEGOTIATIONS WITH ALLRIGHT CAL. INC. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. Action: To direct staff to meet with Allright Cal., Inc. for the purpose of negotiation and return with a proposed agreement extension for Council review and approval. n (n) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION MEETING OF 4/3/96. Action: To approve the recommendation to receive and file the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission action minutes of the regular meeting of April 3, 1996. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) (ORDINANCE NO. -96-1.154A- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM M-1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 330 AND 342 ARDMORE AVENUE AND INCLUDING 615 THIRD STREET (THE SE CORNER OF ARDMORE AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET) AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 27, 1996. Action: To admit Ordinance No. 96--1154 Motion , second'. AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9077 • • 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR DISCUSSION FOR SEPARATE Items 1( ) , ( ) ,' ( •) , and ( ) were heard at are shown in order for clarity. this time but Public comments on items removed from the calendar are shown under the appropriate item. ' PUBLIC HEARINGS consent 4. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND PARKING. PLAN TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN ,EXISTING RESTAURANT/TAVERN, WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, INTO THE ADJACENT EXISTING RESTAURANT SPACE, AND THE ADDITION OF A 600 SQUARE FOOT ROOF SEATING AREA; AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 8 PIER AVENUE, "HENNESSEY'S". Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated. April 2, 1996. Supplemental information for items 4, 5 and 6. submitted 'April 4, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded. to Council questions./ - /� , ��,Jc..,c� v 4.i7 -w) ---Q5 --6",�", n'7 ) J G% (� 0-7' / cip6AA :46/C-L°-' The public. hearing, opened at 6: O� P.M. Co g forward , to 50/ " . • address the Council on this item was: 6 )d t \ J Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste rive, & q e.,-- el .v ,,,,rt2...,`-z»tea---, -„ -9-4/t A ‘2 ) ---. (?. >6 'iArl- Cr"' tos-) i a . . - - - 2 I 0 e - °..‘'... !( \ 1/4-..P......---04<....!,./1 ve36; � .......,412..." (/, X7r1".4--.74.....4....."-) 6130 C ° °')C2'7 .37 . ) ?' --' 4 l'‘" -2•-) I7 6°r' --�`�/,,,„„ .........„..le ..........7„....r. ...... „..-...(2,..... ..,-----2......-4.. 17...t. ../ (......, e public hearing closed at &: P.M. =j� -' (> ___( - `i • ,�(1�G.�.,�, 4.77` vection To sustain the.._P.lanningCommission approval of the project and to \adopt Resolution No. 96-5 8O0\, entitled, 'IA RESOLUTION OF THE -CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY • OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AS AMENDED, AND A PARKING PLAN TO .ACCEPT FEES IN -LIEU OF PARKING, TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING BAR.AND RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE ALCOHOL AND LIVE City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9078 • -H \., , • , \ / c (,,\-`-- \ . 1 ,Th -k (-\' � of � � �� A\ 1� 0 � �� k 1 \ i ,. 1 ‘0 , \.zA _ ‘1 I t- )., i V, / i , v / \ \ i\\-) 1 ; 1,\Tt) %4I s\3\ ' kkA \ l \‘,4,, \ °`t* .0 \ 1 i r\ 11 / rk ,-\ / t'(/) \ \ _I,' li ‘‘ -) i < 1\04 vi ;t i+.\ .-,1 V.../ r'/) c)I)- itc(...fi.)/Y-ir" ‘i\U\ r\i 1 N'-tri\\(5`1k4ir 1 'A)'41. krii � .,\o, \ o`er 1)P1\1 � � Z �'�Fi ‘ (si ' j.)yi,11 i \ . \ri k..• sk), ) ./< ‘,,—>1— ) ,,,/A.\‘ c.() a\lk •%'1 � � — - Cv 4, �./• �c ��/� � ' ENTERTAINMENT INTO THE ADJACENT BUILDING SPACE TO THE WEST AND TO ADD A ROOF -DECK, AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 4 AND 8 PIER AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY 75 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 45 FEET OF LOT 5, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT." Motion Ems(. , second/34 The motion carried b unanimous vote. .4. second/34417 %�-c./ ,'i,C. 5. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NEW 6,200 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE BEER & WINE, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 844 HERMOSA AVENUE, "CALIFORNIA BEACH RESTAURANT". Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. Supplemental letter in opposition from Lenore Christine Landavazo, 841 Manhattan Avenue, dated April 4, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the • staff report and responded to Council estions. --- /9.04 The public hearing opened at 8:11/1 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, )--.,-,v-C//90_440 < a-74 ,11,E 1- � �� , A;46 J (\ b L c The public hearing closedat 7:p O P.M. • Action: To/lsus ain the Planning Commission__approval of the project and to 'adopt Resolution No. 96-5 '0/1, entitled, "A RESOLUTION 'OF THE-CITY-COUNCIL—OF-THE-CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER AND WINE, AND CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOSED RESTAURANT AT 844 HERMOSA AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 23 AND 24 OF TRACT NO. 1564." ii -5 City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9079 • Motion , second unanimous vote. The motion carried by a 6. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL, WITH MODIFICATIONS, OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 17,500 SQUARE FOOT MIXED OFFICE, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT BUILDING ABOVE A TWO -LEVEL -PARKING STRUCTURE; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER & WINE (BREWPUB), OUTSIDE SEATING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, AND ADOPTION -OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 3, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. e public hearing opened at G?: V. P.M. Coming forward to • address the Council on this item was: Q� �?s Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, G�' ce 1(�. 6-# )/e4 C 7 Cf -41° --e The public hearing closed at 94.18 P.M. 17 9r14t-x1//71 • t6I 60- /'7.641 91 /2101 LAc;k. ction: To sustain the Planning Commission approval of the project and to cidopt Resolution No. 96-5 $ b X ,/ entitled, "A RESOLUTION -OF -THE -CITY -COUNCIL -OF- HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY MULTI -USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING ABOVE A TWO-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 16, 17, AND 23, TRACT NO. 1125, AND LOTS 18&19, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH." Motion 5,0C , secondoet443. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. ii City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9080_ vEk — -,rte = o 6 .0)0� ��� • Final Action: To A sustain the Planning._Commission- -a,_. approval of the project and to adopt Resolution No. 96-5$ , entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL -OF -THE -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER AND WINE, OUTSIDE DINING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 16, 17 AND 23, TRACT NO. 1125, AND LOTS 18 AND 19, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH." Motion '( , second. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: 1) Adopt resolution sustaining the Planning Commission's approval of the requested Precise Development Plan subject to conditions; and, 2) Adopt resolution sustaining the Planning Commission's approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions. 411 b?,L.4.-1.--0. 41,4" g • MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 2, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public participation closed at P.M. Action: To 1ntroduce Ordinance No. 96-11 . City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9081 • Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. \96=11 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF-THEMITY`OF-HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITIONS FOR CITY OFFICIALS." AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None 8. CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated 1,1996.4/Zwu-oma. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. • Public participation opened at P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public participation closed at P.M. Action: To • City Ceuneil Minutes 04-09-96 Paae 9082 • • • RECOMMENDATION: Review the agenda item submitted on February 13, 1996 regarding the Commission's recommended master plan for Clark Field parking and provide staff direction. . ORDINANCE TO REPEAL OR AMEND CERTAIN OUT-OF-DATE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 27, 1996. City Clerk Elaine Doerfling presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: Tointroduce Ordinance No. 96-11 Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final_ Action: To Calve further reading of crdinance ONo. S96-11„entitled, "AN—ORDINANCE OF—THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS OR AMENDING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELETING OUT OF DATE MATERIAL FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE.” Motion , second AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None 10. RELOCATION OF MULTI -WAY STOP SIGNS TO PROSPECT AVENUE AND MASSEY AVENUE FROM PROSPECT AVENUE AND HOLLOWELL AVENUE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 2, 1996. Supplemental letter from Steve A. Crecy, 1148 Second Street, dated April 6, 1996, containing a petition with 34 signatures in opposition. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9083 • • • Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public participation closed at P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation: 1) for the relocation of the existing multi -way stop control at Prospect Avenue and Hollowell Avenue to a new location (one block away) at the intersection of Prospect Avenue and Massey Avenue; and, 2) consider the removal of the stop controls on Prospect Avenue at First and Second Streets. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION: Approve removal of STOP controls Street and Second Street. 11. CROSSING GUARD PROGRAM._ relocation on Prospect Memorandum Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at P.M. address the Council on this item were: and consider the Avenue at First from City Manager staff report and Coming forward to Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public participation closed at P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve the appropriation of $30,000 to the Crossing Guard Program to fund the program for the remainder of the school year; 2) provide general direction on the future of the Crossing Guard Program; and, 3) instruct the subcommittee to report back by the May 14, 1996, City Council meeting. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9084 • Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. • • RECOMMENDATION: Approve appropriation of $30,000 from Prospective Expenditures to the Crossing Guard Program to fund the program for the remainder of the school year; provide general direction on the future of the Crossing Guard Program and instruct the subcommittee to report back by the May 14, 1996 City Council meeting. 12. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE / WALK STREETS SURVEY AND ISSUES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. Public participation opened at P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public participation closed at P.M. Action: To Motion , second unanimous vote. • The motion carried by a RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. 13. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE / LOWER PIER AVENUE CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 4, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9085 • • • Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public participation closed at P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Direct staff to review and develop alternatives for City Council consideration at the April 23, 1996 meeting; 2) direct that the Pier Reconstruction subcommittee meet to provide input; and, 3) direct that the decision on the IBI proposal to provide design services be considered at the April 23, 1996 meeting. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 14. HERMOSA INN HOTEL EIRCCONTRACT\FOR CONSULTING SERVICES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public participation closed at P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve award of contract to EIP Associates' for the preparation and processing of an Environmental Impact Report in connection with the Hermosa Inn City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9086 • Hotel Project at a cost of $68,140 which will be paid by the hotel developer; 2) authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by City Attorney; 3) Authorize the Director of Community Development to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council upon completion of work; and, 4) authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes to the scope of work as necessary. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 15. REQUEST FROM ROGER BACON TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF TIME BANNERS CAN BE DISPLAYED ON COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 3, 1996. • City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. • Public participation opened at P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Roger Bacon - property owner, Public participation closed at P.M. Action: To Motion , second unanimous vote. The motion carried by a RECOMMENDATION: Determine whether or not you wish to initiate a change in the code to allow a longer period of time for display of banners. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9087 • • 16. RECOMMENDATION TO RETAIN GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND VENDOR TO COMPLETE CITY HALL FIRST FLOOR OFFICE REMODEL. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public participation closed at P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) award contract to Westcon Enterprises, Inc., a General Contracting Firm, to complete the first floor office remodel for the amount of $36,579; 2) award contract to Jules Seltzer Associates for modular walls and workstations for the amount of $79,414; 3) appropriate $92,730 of UUT funds to cover remodel project costs; and, 4) authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes as necessary commensurate with budget and 10% contingency. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 17. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATION. Manager Stephen Burrell dated Memorandum from City March 28, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9088 • • • 1) AB2228 (Mazzoni) which deals with special education costs statewide and specific limits in Marin and Mono counties; 2) AB2406 (Villaraigosa) would reinstate the ten percent and eleven percent marginal personal income tax rates commencing January 1, 1996 and dedicate this additional revenue to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF); 3) AB2797 (Aguiara) and SB1865 (Craven) would limit the City contribution to the amount paid in the prior year and with any growth in property tax revenue going to the City; and, 4) AB2828 (Sweeney) would allocate an unspecified amount t of the state General Fund to partially repay local agencies for their contribution to ERAF. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION: Review the bills and direct staff to prepare letters for the Mayor's signature indicating the City Councils' support. b. REQUEST FROM CITY OF COVINA Memorandum from City Manager April 3, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented responded to Council questions. FOR SUPPORT OF SB1977. Stephen Burrell dated the staff report and Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize letters of support for SB1977 which would shift one percent of the state sales tax to cities and counties on the basis of population. Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize letters of support for SB1977 which would shift 1% of the state sales tax to cities and counties on the basis of population. c. REQUEST FROM THE AMERICAN OCEANS CAMPAIGN FOR RENEWAL OF THE OCS OIL DRILLING MORATORIUM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 26, 1996. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9089 • City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation and c,adopt- (Resolution No. 96-5 entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF -"THE CITY—COUNCIL—OF—THE—CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING RENEWAL OF THE OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING MORATORIUM AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO PROVIDE LONG TERM PROTECTION FROM OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING." Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION: Determine whether or not the City Council wishes to take a position on this legislation and, if in support, adopt the resolution and authorize the Mayor to sign letter of support. d. REQUEST OF METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT TO SUPPORT PROPOSED COLORADO RIVER PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 26, 1996. • City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION: Determine whether or not the City Council wishes to take a position and, if in support, authorize Mayor to sign letter of support. 18. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 19. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9090 • • • a. Request from Councilmember Bowler for consideration of a suggestion from resident Jack O'Hara for a sister city in Ireland. Councilmember.Bowler spoke to his request. Action: To Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(a), Existing Litigation: Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach: Case No. YS002665, Superior Court - Torrance 2) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: pursuant to Government Code 54957 - City Manager ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned at the hour of P.M. to the closed session. The closed session convened at the hour of P.M. At the hour ofP.M. the closed session reconvened to the Regular Meeting. ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS: There were no decisions made requiring a public announcement. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Wednesday, April 10, 1996 at the hour of A.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, April 23, 1996 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. City. Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9091 • • • Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Paae 9092 ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 9, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 7:09pm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Missy Sheldon ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTATION OF CHECK FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO FirstNIGHT® PRESENTATION OF CHECK FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB TO THE HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION PROCLAMATIONS: MEDAL OF VALOR WEEK APRIL 22-26, 1996 NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK APRIL 14 - 20, 1996 NATIONAL CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH APRIL 1996 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS NONE 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on March 26, 1996; and, 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on March 26, 1996. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving the application for discretionary regional funds for the construction of crosswalks and handicap ramps at various locations in the City. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 27, 1996. (e) Recommendation to approve the agreement between the City of Santa Monica and the City of Hermosa Beach to form a multi-jurisidiction consortium to evaluate the effectiveness of existing practices and devices for controlling urban runoff pollutants at catch basins and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 1, 1996. PULLED BY RB RB/JB MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO LOOK INTO A STORM WATER DIVERSION SYSTEM PILOT PROJECT IN ONE OF OUR STORM DRAINS. VOTE: 4-1 (JR -NO) RB/SE MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ITEM AND RECLAIM $5,000 FROM S.M.B.R.P. AFTER HAVING CITY ATTORNEY VERIFY THAT PARTICIPATION IN THIS PROGRAM IS NOT A REQUIREMENT OF THE N.RD.C. SETTLEMENT. VOTE: 2-3 (JR/JB/JO-NO) MOTION FAILS. 2 JR/JO MOTION TO FORWARD BENZ' PROPOSAL TO THE>S.M.B.R.P'TO CONSIDER AS; PART OF THE PROGRAM. VOTE, 3-2 (RB/SE-N0)...... .. 2 (f) Recommendation to approve the use of the Community Center lawn by the Kiwanis Club to operate a Christmas tree lot for the 1996 holiday season. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1996. (g) Recommendation to approve the IMG - International Volleyball Tournament; A Day at the Beach Triathlon - Sprint Triathlon; and Evian Volleyball Challenge 96' - Junior Tournament for the 1996 season and authorize the Mayor to sign contracts. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. (h) Recommendation to approve keeping the current lease rate of $.93 sp. ft. through fiscal year 1997-98 for rooms in the Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1996. PULLED BY SE SL/JB MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECT STAFF TO REVIEW OVERALL COST OF OOMMUNITV CENTER WHEN BUDGET IS REVIEWED VOTE 5-0 (i) (l) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of 3/20/96. Recommendation to deny the following claim and refer to the City's Liability Claims Administrator. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 3, 1996. Claimant: Victor, Stephani Date of Loss: 12/19/95 Date Filed: 3/28/96 PULLED BY SE SE/JB MOTION FOR;; STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 5-0 (k) Recommendation to amend the City policy with regards to posting meters _ and parking spaces for special events and filming with temporary No Parking signs as follows: 1) meters, parking lots and time limit spaces in the commercial and residential areas shall be posted at least 24 hours in advance; and, 2) non -metered spaces in residential areas shall be posted at least 72 hours in advance. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 3, 1996. (1) Recommendation for Mayor to execute amendment to 95-96 Community Development Block Grant reimbursable contract for implementation of the project to remove architectural barriers to the disabled at City Hall. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. SE/JR MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. VOTE: 4-1 (RBNO).,,. (m) Recommendation for approval to open negotiations with Allright Cal. Inc.. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. PULLED BY RB RB/JB MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION, VOTE: 5-0 (n) Recommendation to receive and file the action minutes from the Downtown Enhancement Commission meeting of 4/3/96. PULLED BY JR JR/JO MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF" TO RETURN WITH A REVIEW OF TUE IN -LIEU PROGRAM, AS WELL AS ITFNNESSEY'S REQUEST FOR IN: LIEU PARKING FUNDING AT MAY 14, 1996 MEETING, VOTE: 4-1 (RB NO) SE/JR MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON BALANCE OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS. VOTE: 5-0 4 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 96-1154 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM M-1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 330 AND 342 ARDMORE AVENUE AND INCLUDING 615 THIRD STREET (THE SE CORNER OF ARDMORE AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET) AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 27, 1996. SE/JB MOTION TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO 96-1154. VOTE: 5-0 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT/TAVERN, WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, INTO THE ADJACENT EXISTING RESTAURANT SPACE, AND THE ADDITION OF A 600 SQUARE FOOT ROOF SEATING AREA, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 8 PIER AVENUE, "HENNESSEY'S". Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. 5 STJJIR MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION SUSTAINING THE PLANI'G' COMMISSION'S APPROVAL AND WRITE A.LETTER TO ABC TO NOTIFY THEM OF COUNCIL'S S ACTIONVETE -0 5 5. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NEW 6,200 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE BEER & WINE, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 844 HERMOSA AVENUE, "CALIFORNIA BEACH RESTAURANT". Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. SE/RB MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION SUSTAIMNG THEPLANING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. VOTE: 5-0 6. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL, WITH MODIFICATIONS, OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 17,500 SQUARE FOOT MIXED OFFICE, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT BUILDING ABOVE A TWO-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER & WINE (BREWPUB), OUTSIDE SEATING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 3, 1996. SE/RB MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION SUSTA1NING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL O `THE REQUESTED PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AND ADOPT RESOLUTION SUSTAINING TUE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF I RE:REQUESTED CONDITIONAL USE:PER 1T SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. yoirg_ 5 0 ................... MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 2, 1996. SE/JO MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM #7 VOTE: 5-0 8. CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. SE/RB MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM #8. VOTE: 5-0 6 9. ORDINANCE TO REPEAL OR AMEND CERTAIN OUT-OF-DATE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 27, 1996. MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE BY DELETING SECTIONS >5, 6 & 7 REFERRING TO PURCHASING AGENT. VOTE: 5-0 1.mysKATOTIOX TO :INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AS AMENI)EI3» VOTE: $. #1 I.SE/JRAIOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER HER READING VOTE: 5-0 10. RELOCATION OF MULTI -WAY STOP SIGNS TO PROSPECT AVENUE AND MASSEY AVENUE FROM PROSPECT AVENUE AND HOLLOWELL AVENUE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 2, 1996. JR/JB MOTION TO HOLD A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, NOTICING RESIDENTS WITHIN 300 FT. RADIUS, BEFORE ANY DECLSION IS MADE TO RELOCATE THE MULTI -WAY STOP SIGNS FROM PROSPECT AVENUE AND HOLLOWELL AVENUE TO PROSPECT AVENUE AND MASSEY AVENUE.. VOTE: 5-0 11. CROSSING GUARD PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. SE/TR MOTION TO APPROVE APPROPRIATION OF $30,000 FROM PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES TO 'I HE CROSSING <GUARD PROGRAM TO FUND THE PROGRAM FOR T HE REMAINDER OF T E SCHOOL YEAR AND INSTRUCT THE SUBCOMMITTEE TO MEET WITH THS SCHOOL BOARD SUB -COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES:::::REr4ESENTATINTSAMIREPORT BACK BY THE MAY 14,1996 CITY COUNCIL FETING VOTE: 4-1 (RB -NO) JO/JD DIRECT .SUBCOMMITTEE TO EXPLORE A DUAL FUNDING ROLE WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICTAND JOINT EFFORT BETWEEN SCHOOL DISTRICT AND POLICE DEPARTMENT TO USE :STUDENTS TO PROVIDE SERVICES. VOTES 5-0 7 12. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG _ BEACH DRIVE/WALKSTREETS SURVEY AND ISSUES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. SE/JB MOTION FOR JR/JO TO FORM AN EAST BEACH DRIVE SUB- COMMITTEE AND MEET TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ISSUES: COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES VS. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, 24TH STREET PROPERTIES, AND MAKING THE WHOLE ENCROACHMENT AREA ON THE EAST SIDE OF BEACH. DRIVE PARKING. DIRECT STAFF TO PROVIDE EXACT PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE DIMENSIONS. VOTE 5-0 .................... . 13. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE / LOWER PIER AVENUE CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 4, 1996. SE/JO MOTION FOR THEPIER RECONSTRUCTION SUBCOMMITTEE TO ............. MEET AND PROVIDE INPUT TO STAFF FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION AT THE 23 1996 MEETING; AND, CONTINUE THE DECISION ON THEIBI PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE DESIGN SERVICES TO THE APRIL 23, I996 MEETING. VOTE: 5-0` 14. HERMOSA INN HOTEL EIR CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. SE/JB MOTION TO APPROVE AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE PREPARATION AND PROCESSING OF .AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Ili CONNECTION WITH KWIWRMOSA,INNEOUX4'PROJECT; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO E r.ECUTE :AN'D THE CITY -CLERK TO ATTEST THE: CONTRACT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY CITY ATTORNEY; AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF COMMVNTTY DEVELOPMENT TO ACCEPT`THE PROJECT AS COMPLETE ON BEHALF OF TRE CITY COUNCIL UPON COMP :ETIO OF WORK; ANI , AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOlt OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO MAKE'MINOR. CHANGES TO THE SCOPE OF WORK AS NECESSARY. VOT.E:. 5_Q 8 15. REQUEST FROM ROGER BACON TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF TIME BANNERS CAN BE DISPLAYED ON COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 3, 1996. JR/JO MOTION TO HAVE RB REVIEW SIGN ORDINANCE AND RECOMMEND WAYS TO CONDENSE IT VOTE: -5-0 16. RECOMMENDATION TO RETAIN GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND VENDOR TO COMPLETE CITY HALL FIRST FLOOR OFFICE REMODEL. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. JB/JR MOTION TO AWARD CON I'.RACT TO WESTCON ENTERPRISES, INC., A GENERAL CONTRACTING FIRM, TO COMPLETE iHE FIRST FLOOR OFFICE REMODEL FOR 1 HE AMOUNT OF $36,579; AWARD CONTRACT TO JULES SELTZER ASSOCIATES FOR.;MODULAR WALLS. AND WORKSTATIONS FOR THE AMOUNT Or 579,414; APPROPRIATE $92,730 OF UUT FUNDS TO COVER REMODEL PROJECT COSTS; AUTHORIZE. THE DIRECTOR<OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO MAKE' MINOR CHANGES AS NECESSARY COMMENSURATE WITH BUDGET AND 10% CONTINGENCE', AND, DIRECT STAFF TO USE C.D.B.G. FUNDS;FOR ALL APPLICABLE WORKK VOTE: 3-2 (SE/RB .NO) 17. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. JR/SE MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE LETTERS FOR THE MAYOR'S SIGNATURE INDICATING TIIE CITY COUNCILS' SUPPORT FOR AB2228, AB2406 AND AB2828. VOTE: 5-0 9 RB/SE MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO RETURN WITH POSSIBLE CHANGES TO THE CODE TO ALLOW A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME FOR DISPLAY OF BANNERS. VOTE: 2-3 (JO/JR/JB-NO) MOTION FAILS JR/JO MOTION TO HAVE RB REVIEW SIGN ORDINANCE AND RECOMMEND WAYS TO CONDENSE IT VOTE: -5-0 16. RECOMMENDATION TO RETAIN GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND VENDOR TO COMPLETE CITY HALL FIRST FLOOR OFFICE REMODEL. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. JB/JR MOTION TO AWARD CON I'.RACT TO WESTCON ENTERPRISES, INC., A GENERAL CONTRACTING FIRM, TO COMPLETE iHE FIRST FLOOR OFFICE REMODEL FOR 1 HE AMOUNT OF $36,579; AWARD CONTRACT TO JULES SELTZER ASSOCIATES FOR.;MODULAR WALLS. AND WORKSTATIONS FOR THE AMOUNT Or 579,414; APPROPRIATE $92,730 OF UUT FUNDS TO COVER REMODEL PROJECT COSTS; AUTHORIZE. THE DIRECTOR<OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO MAKE' MINOR CHANGES AS NECESSARY COMMENSURATE WITH BUDGET AND 10% CONTINGENCE', AND, DIRECT STAFF TO USE C.D.B.G. FUNDS;FOR ALL APPLICABLE WORKK VOTE: 3-2 (SE/RB .NO) 17. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. JR/SE MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE LETTERS FOR THE MAYOR'S SIGNATURE INDICATING TIIE CITY COUNCILS' SUPPORT FOR AB2228, AB2406 AND AB2828. VOTE: 5-0 9 b. REQUEST FROM CITY OF COVINA FOR SUPPORT OF SB1977. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 3, 1996. JR/JO MOTION TO AUTHORIZE LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR SB1977. VOTE: 5-0 c. REQUEST FROM THE AMERICAN OCEANS CAMPAIGN FOR RENEWAL OF THE OCS OIL DRILLING MORATORIUM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 26, 1996. JR/JO MOTION TO ADOPT TH RESOLUTIONAND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN LETTER OF SUPPORT. VOTE: 5-0'. d. REQUEST OF METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT TO SUPPORT PROPOSED COLORADO RIVER PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 26, 1996. RB/JO MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. VOTE: 5-0 18. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 19. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL a. Request from Councilmember Bowler for consideration of a suggestion from resident Jack O'Hara for a sister city in Ireland. JB/SE MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSIDERATION OF A SISTER CITY IN IRELAND, VOTE: 5-0 CITIZEN COMMENTS CONTINUE CLOSED SESSJON TO AN UNDETERMINED DATE. ADJOURNMENT: 11:52PM 10 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, at the hour of 6:10 P.M. ROLL CALL: Present: Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler Absent: Benz (arrived 6:15 P.M.), Edgerton (arrived 6:12 P.M.) INTERVIEWS 'OF APPLICANTS FOR DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION Mayor Bowler called the meeting to order and welcomed the applicants, noting that the actual appointments would be made later during the regular City Council meeting when the scheduled item comes up on the agenda. It was the consensus of Council to follow past procedure for conducting applicant interviews, with each Councilmember asking one question of each applicant and with each applicant being interviewed separately, apart from the others. Recognizing that this was a public meeting open to any member of the public wishing to observe the interviews, each of the applicants present agreed to wait their turn in the City Hall foyer and to enter the Council Chambers one at a time when called. It was noted that two supplemental applications had been received which were not listed in the staff report since both had been submitted after the filing deadline—one from Paul E. Hennessey and the other from Dallas R. Yost. (Councilmember Edgerton arrived at 6:12 P.M. during the interview of Jim Dewey, the first applicant to be interviewed. Councilmember Benz arrived at 6:15 P.M. during the interview of Ronald M. Pizer, the second applicant to be interviewed.) Coming forward to proceed with the interview process and respond to Council questions were the following applicants: 1) Jim Dewey 2) Ronald M. Pizer 3) Sean Kelly 4) Mike Hanlon 5) Claire Wood 6) Dallas R. Yost Commission applicants Paul E. Hennessey and Chris L. Stoten were not present at the interviews. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, at the hour of 6:50 p.m., to the Regular Meeting of the same date, scheduled to begin at the hour of 7:00 p.m. City C ek City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9058 1a« MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, at the hour of 7:15 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Jim Gierlich, resident ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Bowler Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENT: Mayor Bowler reminded the viewing audience that today was an Election Day and the polls would be open until 8:00 P.M. and urged anyone who had not voted to exercise that privilege. Mr. Bowler then thanked the voters for giving him the opportunity to serve as Mayor of Hermosa Beach and said that it had been an exciting time to be the Mayor as the City had dedicated two new parks and had allowed him to preside over both FirstNIGHT and the St. Patrick's Day Parade. He thanked his fellow Councilmembers, City staff and his family with special thanks to his daughter, Jennifer. APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEMPORE: Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 19, 1996. A. Designate Mayor for a term ending January 14, 1997. Action: To designate Julia Oakes as Mayor for a term ending January 14, 1997. Motion Mayor Bowler, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. B. Designate Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending January 14, 1997; Action: To designate J. R. Reviczky as Mayor Pro Tempore for a term ending January 14, 1997. Motion Mayor Bowler, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Newly elected Mayor Oakes assumed her seat as chair of the meeting and presented a plaque of appreciation to oqtgoing Mayor Bowler saying that he had diligently devoted his time to represent the City, had kept the meetings on track, and had provided strong and consistent leadership. Mayor Oakes thanked Mr. Bowler, on behalf of his fellow Councilmembers for his time well served. Councilmember Benz added his thanks. C. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of Mayor as delegate. Action: To appoint Mayor Oakes to the Los Angeles County - City Selection Committee. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9059 11 W Further Action: To appoint Mayor Oakes to the South Bay Cities Sanitation District Board of Directors, and Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky as alternate director. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Further Action: To appoint Mayor Oakes as delegate to the Inglewood Fire Training Authority, and Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky as alternate. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To approve the list of delegates and alternates for City committees as amended above and with the following appointment changes: 1) Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky as delegate to the Beach Cities Committee (in place of Edgerton); 2) Councilmember Benz as delegate to the South Bay Juvenile Diversion Project (in place of Reviczky); 3) Mayor Pro Tempore Reviczky as alternate to the South Bay Juvenile Diversion Project (in place of Benz); and, 4) with the deletion of the following temporary sub -committees: a) Beach Concerts; b) Lifeguard Negotiations; and, c) Mixed Use. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Mayor Oakes spoke of the true spirit of cooperation and respect that prevailed on the Council in spite of moments of public banter and said she was proud of the accomplishments of the City which had excellent schools, great public safety departments and a beautiful location. Ms. Oakes said she hoped to continue with safety programs, expand on enrolling volunteers for emergency relief programs, maintain the upgrade to the shopping and commercial ares, and continue the City's help with cultural programs. And, she stressed the role of improving the communication of the City with the public both through the City Council and through the Commissions. Mayor Oakes thanked everyone for the opportunity to serve, with special thanks to her husband, Lee, her parents and her new daughter, Geneva. RECESS: The meeting recessed at the hour of 7:40 P.M. RECONVENE: The meeting reconvened at the hour of 7:55 P.M. City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9060 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Kelly Ress - 131 Monterey Blvd., asked the Council to consider building a skateboard rink as skateboarders were not allowed to skate in the rink at South Park; said the City had built a roller hockey rink and it was not fair to deny skateboarders a place to skate; said the Police told skateboarders where they could not skate but did not say where they could skate; said a skateboard park would keep kids out of trouble by allowing them a place to skate without being where they should not be and could be signed "Use at Your Own Risk" to cut down on liability to the City; Mike Sliff - 854 Bard, spoke in support of a skateboard park; said the liability would be no greater than the roller hockey rink that the City had approved; said the skateboarders would help to build the park and help to raise the money; said the unused parking lot above South Park would be a good location; felt that providing a roller blade rink but not a skateboard rink was discriminatory; Jay Sheldon - 236 Tenth Street, said it would be good for the City to allow a skateboard park as that would keep kids from skateboarding where they are not supposed to skate such as the sidewalks and the streets; said the Constitution provided the people with the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and that being allowed to skateboard made all of the skateboarders very happy; Rodney Mullen - 1738 Manhattan Avenue, said he held the World Championship in Freestyle Skateboarding from 1980 to 1992 and has owned a skateboard company for the past seven years; said that skateboarding has taken him all over the world and that he has been in skateboard parks in Russia, Canada and Australia; said that the skateboarders were good kids and needed a place to skate, that all it would take were a few plywood structures, not elaborate steel or concrete rinks, to provide a place for them to skate; Jack Davis - 596 19th Street, said he felt that the City should let skaters do tricks at South Park as long as they were not on the hockey rink and asked the Council to build a skateboard park for them; Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, requested that the Council appeal the Planning Commission City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9061 approval of Patrick Malloy's Steak House (noted in item 1(i)) in order to save the developer two weeks time before he appealed the project; and, John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, asked that item 1(h) be removed from the consent calendar; and spoke of safety issues regarding the Olympic Torch Run shown in item 1(e). Councilmember Reviczky spoke of the vandalism to South Park that had caused the ban on skateboarding in the park. Action: To direct the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission to consider an appropriate location for a skateboard park and to consider amending the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code as it pertains to skateboarding. Motion Reviczky, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None At 8:14 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting with item 4. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (i), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (e) Bowler and (h) Reviczky at the request of John Burt. Motion Benz, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on March 12, 1996. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 12, 1996 as presented. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 5791 THROUGH 5796 INCLUSIVE, NOS. 5950 THROUGH 5962 INCLUSIVE, NO. 6102, AND NOS. 6282 THROUGH 6286 INCLUSIVE. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9062 Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d)-- RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE FEBRUARY 1996 FINANCIAL REPORTS: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the February, 1996 Financial Reports as presented. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE STREET CLOSURES AND CHALK ART FESTIVAL EVENT FOR THE OLYMPIC TORCH RUN APRIL 27, 1996. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 19, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Bowler for separate discussion later in the meeting in order to alert the public to this event and to encourage everyone to attend. Community Resources Director Rooney said she wished to publicly thank Vasek Polak for his check to underwrite this event and to thank the volunteers with Arts Hermosa for their time and effort. Action: To the staff recommendation to: 1) approve street closures and chalk art festival event for the Olympic Torch Run from 10:00 to 10:15 P.M., on April 27, 1996, including: a) the street chalk art work of Timothy Morgan Steele who, with a crew of four, will work for two days prior to the 27th to create the "Olympic Spirit" as a movable 20' by 24' work of art; and, b) participation by Hermosa students in chalk artwork on the sidewalks at Pier and Hermosa Avenues with medals given to participants; c) the Mira Costa High School Band at 8:00 P.M. on April 27, 1996; d) five torch runners along Hermosa Avenue: from the Manhattan boundary to 25th street, at 19th Street, at Pier Avenue and at Fifth Street; and, 2) receive and file the report. And, with the additional direction to the committee to explore the possibility of a musical event or street dance in conjunction with the torch run and art show. Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION ADOPTING DISABILITY RETIREMENT PROCEDURES FOR SAFETY MEMBERS. Memorandum City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9063 from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated March 18, 1996. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 96-5798, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING DISABILITY RETIREMENT PROCEDURES FOR SAFETY MEMBERS." (g) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MEMORANDUM CONTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S SUGGESTED TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION AT THE JOINT MEETING SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 30, 1996. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 18, 1996. Action: To receive and file the memorandum containing the Planning Commission's suggested topics for discussion at the joint meeting scheduled for April 30, 1996, at the hour of 7:00 P. M. The topics consist of: 1) Downtown business mix; 2) off- sale alcohol in the downtown area; 3) parking impacts upon the residential areas around the downtown; and, 4) overall goals for the City and Pacific Coast Highway development (h) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT A DONATION OF $830.00 FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACOUIRING A BENCH FOR NOBLE PARK SITE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 21, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting, at the request of John Burt. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, spoke in opposition to accepting a bench for Noble Park as it would promote drinking beer or liquor in the park; suggested that the City install a water drinking fountain instead. Action: To accept the donation of Dr. Albert Ackroyd in the amount of $830 to. enable the City to acquire a five foot teak wood bench (Smith Hawken's "Gloucester Bench") for Noble Park. Motion Bowler, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To have the City purchase additional benches for the Park at this time. Motion Edgerton. The motion died due to the lack of a second. City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9064 (i) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1996. -- Action: To receive and file the action minutes from the Planning commission meeting of March 19, 1996.. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(e) and (h) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. ZONE CHANGE FROM M-1, LIGHT MANUFACTURING, TO R-2, TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 330 & 342 ARDMORE AVENUE (THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARDMORE AVENUE AND 4TH STREET) AND INCLUDING 615 3RD STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 18, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:18 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Ben Agarwal - representing the property owner, said the present body shop owner/tenant was retiring and wished to develop the land for residential property; said he had a title guarantee and that the question involved an easement not a boundary question; responded to Council questions; Susan Scott - 603 Third Street, said that sie was the neighbor involved in the easement negotiation regarding a common driveway and a garage, and that as long as the matter was settled as the negotiations indicated it would be, she had no objection to the project; and, John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, expressed concerns regarding the former Railroad right-of-way. The public hearing closed at 8:24 P.M. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 96-1154. Motion Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9065 Further Action: To direct staff to return at some future time with a report regarding re -zoning the remaining M-1 property in the area to R-2, noting: 1) that this was not a high priority item; and, 2) that all affected property owners be notified. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried without objection. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 96-1154, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM M-1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 330 AND 342 ARDMORE AVENUE AND INCLUDING 615 THIRD STREET (THE SE CORNER OF ARDMORE AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET) AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Motion Bowler, second Edgerton. AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 7 TO ADD A SECTION IN REGARD TO REOUIRING PROTECTIVE COATING OF METAL HANDRAILS. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 18, 1996. Action: To continue this item to the meeting of April 23, 1996, at the recommendation of staff. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FY 96-97. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 20, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:49 P.M. Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 8:49 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve by minute order the expenditure of second year, 1996-97 Community Development Block Grant fund estimated allocation in the amount of $145,215, and any additional allocation funding, for the removal of architectural barriers to the disabled at the Police, Fire and Community Center facilities; 2) approve Cost Summary submittal; and, 3) with the direction to staff to report back with a list of last year's projects and estimated costs. City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9066 Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. At -the hour,of 8:50 P.M. the order of the agenda was returned to item 1. 7. MUNICIPAL MATTERS - None 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. LOS ANGELES COUNTY LEAGUE DIVISION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE/LIBRARY TASK FORCE PROPOSED LEGISLATION REGARDING LIBRARY PROPERTY TAXES, BUILDINGS AND CONTENTS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 19, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report, noting the change of date to Wednesday, April 17th, and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Charlotte Malone - representing the Hermosa Beach Friends of the Library, expressed the Friends of the Library's agreement with the goals of the proposed legislation and with the City's decision to work for its passage; said it was a matter of fairness, that whoever has the responsibility for the Library should have the funds, paid by property tax assessment, for its upkeep; and, said the Friends of the Library had voted funds to help in any way possible. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Receive and file report; 2) Authorize Mayor Oakes and Councilmember Bowler (Councilmember Benz as an alternate) and the City Manager to appear at the April 17, 1996, Local Government Committee meeting in Sacramento; 3) Authorize letters of support for SB1998 as proposed to members of the Senate Local Government Committee; and, 4) Authorize letters regarding co-sponsorship of SB1998 as proposed to Senator Dills and Assemblywoman Bowen. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. VACANCIES: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - EXPIRATION OF TERMS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 21, 1996. Supplemental application received from Paul Hennessey on March 21, 1996 and from Dallas Yost dated March 26, 1996. City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9067 Action: To re -appoint James Dewey to fill the four-year term on the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission ending September 15, 1999. Motion Bowler, second Mayor Oakes. The motion carried without objection. Action: To appoint Dallas Yost to fill the four-year term on the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission ending September 15, 1999. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried without objection. Mayor Oakes expressed the thanks and gratitude of the Council to all who had come forward and expressed an interest in serving the City and said that it had been a difficult decision for the Council to make as all applicants were qualified and would have served well on the Commission. A special thank you was given to Ron Pizer for his service on the Commission. 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: a. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to discuss setting up a system wherein the City would give back a percentage of business license fees based upon sales tax payout. (Continued from meeting of March 12, 1996.) Councilmember Edgerton spoke to his request. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions saying that the business license schedule was being reviewed and would be returned to the Council in the near future. Action: To direct staff to review the procedure used in El Segundo and report back to Council if an amendment could be made to the Business License Fee Schedule to give a sales tax credit to business license holders. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried without objection. b. Request by Councilmember Benz to revise the home occupation rules and regulations. Councilmember Benz spoke to his request. Action: To direct staff to report back with possible changes to the home occupation rules and regulations regarding satellite home offices. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion carried without objection. City Council Minutes 03-26-96 Page 9068 c. Request by Councilmember Benz to create a campaign for improving Hermosa Beach's image with location scouts. Councilmember Benz spoke to his request. Action: To appoint Councilmember Benz as the City's liaison for improving Hermosa Beach's image with location scouts. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried without objection. City Manager Burrell said there would be an Emergency Preparedness Workshop for Elected Officials on Wednesday, April 3, 1996 from 6:00 to 7:30 P.M. at the Community Center. CITIZEN COMMENTS No one came forward to address the Council at this time. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, March 26, 1996 at the hour of 9:38 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, April 9, 1996 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. #.444.e. n^1iw,.4 1 1.44 wn4-ee Deputy ity Clerk A1 -9K. -0F Dara QAFQ VOUCHRE2 03/20/96 12:21 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 6287 03/20/96 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 PAYROLL/3-1 TO 3-15-96 6288 03/20/96 007060 AARON MARKS 6289 03/20/96 007061 PHOENIX ASSOCIATES PER DIEM ADV/COMPUTER TRNG AIRFARE REIMB/COMPUTER TRNG TUITION/A. MARKS COMPUTER TRNG 6290 03/20/96 000026 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMEN RETIREMENT/3-1 TO 3-15-96 RETIREMENT/3-1 TO 3-15-96 RETIREMENT/3-1 TO 3-15-96 RETIREMENT/3-1 TO 3-15-96 RETIREMENT/3-1 TO 3-15-96 RETIREMENT/3-1 TO 3-15-96 RETIREMENT/3-1 TO 3-15-96 RETIREMENT/3-1 TO 3-15-96 RETIREMENT/3-1 TO 3-15-96 RETIREMENT ADJ/CITY CLERK ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1103 001-1103 105-1103 109-1103 110-1103 140-1103 145-1103 152-1103 155-1103 160-1103 705-1103 001-2201-4317 001-2201-4317 001-2201-4317 001-2033 105-2033 109-2033 110-2033 140-2033 155-2033 160-2033 705-2033 001-3915 001-1121-4180 V- 9 - ITEM AMOUNT 229,151.28 47,993.85- 7,288.23 637.51 24,870.35 169.93 1,349.90 83.92 455.38 10,232.49 3,125.18 100.00 134.00 400.00 41,981.72 956.51 98.60 3,493.25 26.82 86.84 1,299.81 294.39 41,981.72- 699.18 - PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 229,370.32 234.00 400.00 5,557.04 TOTAL CHECKS 235,561.36 lb' VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 03/20/96 12:21 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 181,092.25 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 8,244.74 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 736.11 110 PARKING FUND 28,363.60 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 196.75 145 PROPOSITION ,A FUND 1,349.90 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 83.92 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 542.22 160 SEWER FUND 11,532.30 705 INSURANCE FUND 3,419.57 TOTAL 235,561.36 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 03/20/96 12:21 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES /_TO 3 INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR •Wd019(� ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY 1.L.4!/J ULXiR.« FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE 42/AO/WOab/�l/ 0 PAGE 3 VOUCHRE2 03/21/96 15:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6291 03/21/96 000002 A&B AIR CONDITIONING 6292 03/21/96 007017 ACCOUNTEMPS 6293 03/21/96 000003 ADVANCE ELEVATOR 6294 03/21/96 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 6295 03/21/96 003209 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR 6296 03/21/96 006827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION HEATER REPAIR/P.D. WALL HEATER REPAIR TEMP HELP/FINANCE-W/E 2-9 TEMP HELP/FINANCE-W/E 2-16 TEMP HELP/FINANCE-W/E 2-23 TEMP HELP/FINANCE-W/E 3-1 ELEVATOR MAINT/MAR 96 RADIO MAINT/MAR 96 RADIO MAINT/MAR 96 RADIO MAINT/MAR 96 CELLULAR CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 CELLULAR CHGS/FEB 96 CELLULAR CHGS/JAN & FEB 96 CROSSING GRD SERV/JAN 96 CROSSING GRD SERV/JAN & FEB 96 CROSSING GUARD SERV/FEB 96 6297 03/21/96 005221 ALL POINTS MAINTENANCE PIER MAINT/FEB 96 PIER MAINT/INCREASE JAN 96 TRUCK INSPECTION/P.W. ASSESSMENT REBATE REGISTRATION/STRASER & LAVIN MEMBER DUES/SCHUBACH & ROBERTS 6298 03/21/96 004971 ALTEC INDUSTRIES 6299 03/21/96 005432 MADELINE ALTORFER 6300 03/21/96 007070 AMERICAN DEFENSE 6301 03/21/96 005628 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC 6302 03/21/96 000152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE 6303 03/21/96 002021 FRANK 0. ARBOGAST 6304 03/21/96 006200 ARTS HERMOSA UTILITY RAGS/FEB 96 UTILITY RAGS/FEB 96 UTILTIY RUGS/FEB 96 UTILITY RUGS/FEB 96 UTITLITY RUGS/FEB 96 UTILITY RAGS/FEB 96 UTILITY RAGS/FEB 96 UTILITY RUGS/FEB 96 UTILITY RUGS/FEB 96 UTILITY RUGS/FEB 96 ASSESSMENT REBATE SHUTTLE SERVICE/FIRST NIGNT SHUTTLE SERVICE/FIRST NIGHT 6305 03/21/96 005179 AT&T FAX/LD CHGS/JAN-FEB 96 FAX/LD CHGS/JAN-FEB 96 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-1202-4201 001-1202-4201 001-1202-4201 001-1202-4201 001-4204-4201 110-3302-4307 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1202-4304 155-2102-4201 155-2102-4201 155-2102-4201 001-3104-4201 001-3104-4201 105-2601-4201 105-3105 001-2101-4317 001-4101-4315 001-4204-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-2201-4309 001-4204-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-2201-4309 105-3105 145-3401-4251 145-3401-4251 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 ITEM AMOUNT 346.72 74.00 401.63 571.20 142.80 562.28 100.00 239.50 2,387.50 205.00 160.86 38.49 98.54 4,007.52 4,042.91 4,042.91 785.00 105.00 664.00 37.98 150.00 448.00 14.40 6.00 44.66 35.51 25.00 14.40 6.00 44.66 35.51 25.45 37.98 456.64 526.98 .89 .44 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 420.72 1,677.91 100.00 2,832.00 297.89 12,093.34 890.00 664.00 37.98 150.00 448.00 251.59 37.98 983.62 VOUCHRE2 03/21/96 15:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6306 03/21/96 007018 ILENE ATKINSON 6307 03/21/96 000407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY 6308 03/21/96 007019 HEADLEY C. BARNES 6309 03/21/96 007024 BIG SKY RACKS, INC. 6310 03/21/96 000894 THOMAS BOHLIN 6311 03/21/96 007020 MARCELLA BRAYLEY 6312 03/21/96 000155 6313 03/21/96 000034 6314 03/21/96 000598 6315 03/21/96 000695 6316 03/21/96 000411 6317 03/21/96 005631 6318 03/21/96 005935 BROWNING & FERRIS INDUS BUSINESS SYSTEMS CORPOR CA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS CA PEACE OFFICER'S ASSO CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF CALIFORNIA CHARTER/K-T CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT 6319 03/21/96 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC 6320 03/21/96 007022 ROBERT CARSON 6321 03/21/96 '000014 CHAMPION CHEVROLET CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION FAX/LD CHGS/JAN-FEB 96 FAX/LD CHGS/JAN-FEB 96 FAX/LD CHGS/JAN-FEB 96 FAX/LD CHGS/JAN-FEB 96 FAX/LD CHGS/JAN-FEB 96 FAX/LD CHGS/JAN-FEB 96 FAX/LD CHGS/JAN-FEB 96 ASSESSMENT REBATE LOCKSMITH SERV/FEB 96 LOCKSMITH SERV/FEB 96 LOCKSMITH SERV/FEB 96 ASSESSMENT REBATE GUN RACK/PATROL CAR TRAVEL EXP/BOHLIN ASSESSMENT REBATE TRASH P/U SERV/JAN & FEB 96 COMPUTER SUPP/P.D. MEMBERSHIP/WORKMAN MEM.DUES/STRASER 96-97 MEMBERSHIP/SWARTZ BUS TRANS/SKI TRIP-COM.RES. STREET SWEEPING SERV/FEB 96 INSTALL 3 FIRE HYDRANTS WATER BILL CHGS/JAN-FEB 96 ASSESSEMENT REBATE DEALER AUTO PARTS/JAN 96 DEALER AUTO PARTS/JAN 96 DEALER AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 DEALER AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 DEALER AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 DEALER AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 DEALER AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1131-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1206-4304 110-1204-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 105-3105 001-2101-4309 001-2201-4309 001-4204-4309 105-3105 001-2101-5401 001-2101-4312 105-3105 109-3301-4201 001-2101-4305 001-1141-4315 001-2101-4315 001-4201-4315 145-3409-4201 001-3104-4201 180-2202-4201 001-4202-4303 105-3105 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4311 001-4204-4311 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4311 001-2101-4311 6322 03/21/96 006195 JEFFREY KENT CHILD MD PRISONER EMERG SERVICES 001-2101-4201 ITEM AMOUNT .30 3.12 .75 3.57 1.76 3.26 .58 37.98 8.12 1.29 41.67 37.98 221.75 390.00 37.98 750.34 950.00 75.00 125.00 150.00 552.75 9,300.00 14,106.88 52.48 37.98 45.47 22.08 83.57 92.24 92.24 25.33 45.47 - PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 14.67 37.98 51.08. 37.98 221.75 390.00 37.98 750.34 950.00 75.00 125.00 150.00 552.75 9,300.00': 14,159.36' 37.98 315.46 72.00 72.00 VOUCHRE2 03/21/96 15:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME 6323 03/21/96 007021 VIRGINIA D. CLEMO CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT REBATE 6324 03/21/96 004928 COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FO LIABILITY CLAIMS/FEB 96 6325 03/21/96 006926 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS BLUEPRINTS/1ST FLR REMODEL BLUEPRINTS/SEWER PROJECT 6326 03/21/96 007062 JOEL CRANDALL CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 6327 03/21/96 000642 THE DAILY BREEZE EMPLOYEE ADS/FEB 96 6328 03/21/96 002390 DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. EMP PHYSICAL/DEC 95 6329 03/21/96 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. 6330 03/21/96 006100 DATAVAULT 6331 03/21/96 005094 DENN ENGINEERS DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/FEB 96 DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/FEB 96 OFFSITE STORAGE/FEB 96 ENGRG SERV/PUBLIC WORKS 6332 03/21/96 000269 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPO COMPUTER MAINT/MAR 96 COMPUTER MAINT/MAR 96 6333 03/21/96 000165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO P AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 AUTO PARTS/FEB'96 AUTO PARTS/FEB 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN 6334 03/21/96 001400 EFRAM MOBIL 6335 03/21/96 006137 ENTRIX, INCORPORATED 6336 03/21/96 005714 EXECUTIVE IMPRESSIONS MOTORCYCLE GAS/FEB 96 CITY YARD RELOCATION SERV SPRING BROCHURE 6337 03/21/96 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE JANITORIAL SERV/FEB96 6338 03/21/96 007025 LILLIAN FAY ASSESSMENT REBATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 105-3105 705-1209-4324 001-4201-4305 160-8408-4201 110-3302 001-1203-4201 001-1203-4320 110-1204-4201 110-1204-4201 001-1206-4201 160-8408-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4311 001-2201-4311 105-2601-4311 160-3102-4311 001-3104-4311 110-3302-4311 001-4101-4311 001-4202-4311 001-4204-4311 001-2021 001-2022 001-2101-4310 001-8608-4201 001-4601-4302 001-4204-4201 105-3105 6339 03/21/96 007068 FOUR SEASONS TRUCK CENT TRUCK BED/ANIMAL CONTROL TRUCK 110-3302-5403 6340 03/21/96 005269 FRIDEN NEOPOST POSTAGE METER SUPPLIES 6341 03/21/96 004730 MOLLY JO GEE REFUND ON SPRING CLASS 001-1208-4305 001-3893 ITEM AMOUNT 37.98 11,881.61 19.92 80.35 20.00 106.44 129.00 143.50 33.74 109.64 650.00 171.47 114.31 640.87 16.02 237.53 241.67 27.60 230.93 9.14 123.28 53.85 32.27 32.27- 77.39 4,091.70 3,680.50 5,380.00 37.98 324.75 59.66 37.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 37.98 11,881.61 100.27 20.00 106.44 129.00 177.24 109.64 650.00 285.78 1,580.89 77.39 4,091.70 3,680.50 5,380.00; 37.98': 324.75 59.66 37.00 VOUCHRE2 03/21/96 15:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6342 03/21/96 007026 PATRICIA GOLISH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT REBATE 6343 03/21/96 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 TELEPHONE CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 FAX CHGS JAN/FEB 96 6345 03/21/96 001340 GTEL 6346 03/21/96 007029 CAROL HART,CSR TELEPHONE INSTALL/E.O.C. TELEPHONE INSTALL/E.O.C. TELEPHONE CHANGES/POLICE COURT TRANSCRIPT/POLICE 6347 03/21/96 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. TEMP BLDG INSP 1/9 TO 2/14 6348 03/21/96 004075 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS/2/14/96 WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS/2/23/96 WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS 3/4/96 WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS 3/12/96 6349 03/21/96 007027 ALBERT HODGES ASSESSMENT REBATE 6350 03/21/96 007028 HAZEL HOREY ASSESSMENT REBATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 105-3105 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 109-3301-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 001-4204-4321 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-2201-4304 001-2201-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4305 001-4201-4201 705-1217-4324 705-1217-4324 705-1217-4324 705-1217-4324 105-3105 105-3105 ITEM AMOUNT 37.98 10.63 22.58 11.95 10.63 22.58 22.58 67.74 34.53 328.09 11.95 1,696.21 407.31 16.65 79.69 234.91 51.09 67.74 395.38 244.53 97.87 1.88 2.01 3.07 3.58 .48 .51 17.68 .22 7.20 4.28 14.60 2,044.62 546.93 343.39 50.00 2,970.00 4.80 10,045.30 6,593.60 18,539.23 37.98 37.98 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 37.98 3,890.15 2,934.94 50.00 2,970.00 35,182.93 37.98 37.98 VOUCHRE2 03/21/96 15:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6351 03/21/96 006305 JESSE IBATUAN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION LIGHTING TECH/2-17-96 THEATRE TECH 3/3/96 6352 03/21/96 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/JAN 96 MAINT SUPP/P.W. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/FEB 96 6353 03/21/96 006140 INSTASHRED SECURITY SER SHREDDING SERV/FEB 96 6354 03/21/96 007066 JOHN SAIN CONSTRUCTION WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 6355 03/21/96 007030 SCOTT A. JONES 6356 03/21/96 007031 MOHIT KAPILA 6357 03/21/96 007063 EDWARD L. KARNAS 6358 03/21/96 007034 PARKER KEMP 6359 03/21/96 007033 MARGARET KERNER 6360 03/21/96 007032 RUTH KNAPP 6361 03/21/96 007035 JOSEPH KOEHR 6362 03/21/96 002428 L.A. CO POLICE CHIEFS' WINTER CLASS REFUND CITE PAYMENT REFUND REFUND OF CITE PYMT ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE MEMBERSHIP/STRASER 6363 03/21/96 000843 L.A. COUNTY METROPOLITA BUS PASS SALES/FEB 96 6364 03/21/96 004303 LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 6365 03/21/96 007036 LOIS LAWLESS 6366 03/21/96 000167 LEARNED LUMBER LANDSCAPE-MAINT/FEB 96 ASSESSMENT REBATE BUILDING SUPPLIES/FEB 96 MEASURING TAPE BUILDING SUPPLIES/FEB 96 ROUGH REDWOOD STAKES/FEB 96 CAULK AND HINGES 6367 03/21/96 002175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIE LEGALS SERV/FEB 96 6368 03/21/96 007005 DEBRA LUCAS 6369 03/21/96 004611 GREGORY LUTZ 6370 03/21/96 001255 MANERI SIGN CO., INC. 6371 03/21/96 000605 MANHATTAN FORD REFUND OF RENTAL/COM CTR REFUND WORK GUAN/DEP STREET SIGN SUPPLIES AUTO REPAIR/FEB 96 VEHICLE PURCH/ANIMAL CTRL VEHICLE PURCHASE/P.W. ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4601-4201 001-4601-4201 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 001-2101-4201 . 001-2110 001-3893 110-3302 110-3302 105-3105 105-3105 105-3105 105-3105 001-2101-4315 145-3403-4251 001-4202-4201 105-3105 001-4204-4309 160-3102-4309 001-4202-4309 001-4202-4309 001-4204-4309 001-1203-4201 001-3405 001-2110 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4311 715-3302-5403 715-2601-5403 ITEM AMOUNT 65.00 30.00 113.66 2,035.75 164.97 56.00 1,600.00 10.00 20.00 8.00 37.98 37.98 37.98 37.98 100.00 516.00 7,910.00 37.98 313.93 32.82 46.36 122.32 45.49 1,061.65 25.00 1,600.00 871.41 28.48 15,444.95 15,444.94 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 95.00 2,314.38 56.00 1,600.00 10.00 20.00 8.00 37.98 37.98 37.98 37.98 100.00 516.00 7,910.00 37.98. 560.92 1,061.65 25.00 1,600.00 871.41 30,918.37 VOUCHRE2 03/21/96 15:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 6372 6373 6374 6375 6376 VENDOR NUMBER 03/21/96 003731 03/21/96 007064 03/21/96 005617 03/21/96 007038 03/21/96 007037 VENDOR NAME BETTY MARTIN TONY M. MARTINEZ MASCO TECH MARVIN MAY JUNE W. MCCLAIN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ASSESSEMENT REBATE CITE PYMT REFUND ACCOUNT NUMBER 105-3105 110-3302 CLARK FIELD SCOREBOARD REPAIR 001-4202-4201 ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE 6377 03/21/96 003080 MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC GASOLINE PURCH/CITY YARD 6378 03/21/96 006668 MGMT INSPECTION & SERVI SEWER PROJECT INSP/FEB 96 6379 03/21/96 007039 KENT OR CHERYL MORRIS 6380 03/21/96 002734 MICHAEL MURPHY CITE PYMT REFUND INSTRUCTOR/COM CTR 105-3105 105-3105 001-1401 160-8408-4201 110-3302 001-4601-4201 6381 03/21/96 005563 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION R SAFETY FENCE RENTAL/FEB-MAR 96 001-4201-4201 6382 03/21/96 000606 NEW PACIFIC LUMBER CO. 6383 03/21/96 007041 DOUGLAS NEWMAN 6384 03/21/96 006224 LISA NEWSOM 6385 03/21/96 007040 N. NUSSMAN 6386 03/21/96 002514 OFFICE DEPOT 6387 03/21/96 002487 PAGENET 6388 03/21/96 004629 PASADENA CITY COLLEGE 6389 03/21/96 007044 ALPHA PASSINO 6390 03/21/96 007045 DONALD PITTS 6391 03/21/96 007043 VERLAINE PRATTE 6392 03/21/96 000296 THE PRINT NETWORK CEMEMT & PLASTIC ASSESSMENT REBATE BOOK REIMB/NEWSOM CITE PYMT REFUND OFFICE SUPP STOCK/JAN 96 OFFICE SUPP STOCK/JAN 96 OFFICE SUPP STOCK/FEB 96 OFFICE SUPP STOCK/FEB 96 PAGING SERVICES/MAR 96 PAGING SERVICES/MAR 96 PAGING SERVICES/MAR 96 PAGING SERVICES/MAR 96 PAGING SERVICES/MAR 96 PAGING SERVICES/MAR 96 PAGING SERVICES/MAR 96 TUITION/ADMIN HEARING OFCR ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE NON -SCHOOL DAY FLYERS ROLLER HOCKEY LEAG SUPP 001-3104-4309 105-3105 001-4601-4188 110-3302 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-2101-4201 001-1201-4201 001-1203-4201 110-3302-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 001-1206-4201 001-2101-4317 105-3105 105-3105 105-3105 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4308 ITEM AMOUNT 37.98 5.00 454.62 37.98 37.98 3,278.32 8,963.25 20.00 441.00 41.65 95.26 37.98 60.57 10.00 174.99 11.76- 435.00 265.85 195.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 34.50 126.50 11.50 99.00 37.98 37.98 37.98 37.89 15.16 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 37.98 5.00 454.62 37.98 37.98 3,278.32 8,963.25 20.00 441.00 41.65 95.26 37.98 60.57 10.00 864.08 402.50,} 99.00' 37.98 37.98 37.98 VOUCHRE2 03/21/96 15:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME 6393 03/21/96 007046 MARINO PROTTI 6394 03/21/96 001429 RADIO SHACK 6395 03/21/96 007049 EVA RAQUET 6396 03/21/96 007065 TOM READ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ROLLER HOCKEY FLYERS CITE PYMT REFUND CITE PYMT REFUND VIDEO CAMERA PLUG/P.D. COMPUTER PROTECTOR/P.D. ASSESSMENT REBATE SPRING CLASS REFUND 6397 03/21/96 003282 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH DIAL A RIDE/2ND QTR FIRSTNIGHT/SERV FAREBOX RECOVERY 6398 03/21/96 007048 BERNARD ROBBINS 6399 03/21/96 007047 JOYCE ROBISON 6400 03/21/96 004061 SYLVIA ROOT ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE MINUTES SEC 2/20/96 MINUTES SEC 2/7/96 6401 03/21/96 006408 ROS SERVICE DIVISION OFFICE SUPP/COM. RES. 6402 03/21/96 002500 S & J SALES MAINT SUPP/P.D. 6403 03/21/96 000839 SUSAN SAXE-CLIFFORD PH PSYCH EVAL/POLICE RESERVE 6404 03/21/96 006353 STANLEY E. SCHOLL 6405 03/21/96 003505 SHORELINE PRINTING 6406 03/21/96 001399 SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 6407 03/21/96 005963 SIR SPEEDY SEWER REHAB PROJ SERV BUS. CARDS/SWARTZ BUS.CARDS/WRIGHT & KEARIN ALARM PERMITS/P.D. PAINT SUPP/NOV 95 SOUTH PRK OPENING INVITATIONS 6408 03/21/96 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP COM. RES. CLASS SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES/FEB 96 6409 03/21/96 006211 R.A. SMITH JR. OILWELL MAINT/MAR 96 6410 03/21/96 007050 WILLIAM SNOW ASSESSMENT REBATE 6411 03/21/96 002009 SO CAL TRAINING OFCRS A MEMBERSHIP/B.SCOTT 6412 03/21/96 002250 SO. CAL SHARPSHOOTER, I TACTICAL ENTRY VEST 6413 03/21/96 007067 SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4601-4308 110-3302 110-3302 001-2101-4309 001-2101-4305 105-3105 001-3893 145-3401-4251 145-3401-4251 145-3854 105-3105 105-3105 001-4102-4201 001-4102-4201 001-4601-4305 001-2101-4309 001-1203-4320 160-8408-4201 001-4201-4305 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4305 001-4202-4309 001-4601-4302 001-4601-4308 001-2201-4309 001-8608-4201 105-3105 001-2201-4315 001-2101-4187 001-2110 ITEM AMOUNT 31.61. 5.00 5.00 4.85 38.96 37.98 75.00 40,687.77 670.92 3,338.91- 37.98 37.98 260.16 239.81 25.10 2,052.63 275.00 2,250.00 37.89 70.00 129.90 101.15 185.87 43.08 56.85 150.00 37.98 30.00 470.89 500.00 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 84.66 10.00 43.81 37.98 75.00 38,019.78 37.98 37.98 499.97 25.10. 2,052.63 275.00 2,250.00 237.79 101.15 185.87 99.93 150.00 37.98 30.00 470.89.°' VOUCHRE2 03/21/96 15:08 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 8 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT ADD'L STAFF TIME 001-3406 44.00- 456.00 6414 03/21/96 000107 SOUTH BAY MEDICAL CENTE PRISONER EMERG SERVICES PRISONER EMERG SERVICES PRISONER EMERG SERVICES DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN 6415 03/21/96 006060 SOUTH COAST AQMD ANNUAL FILING FEES 001-2101-4201 135.69 001-2101-4201 21.78 001-2101-4201 305.34 001-2021 249.19 001-2022 249.19- 152-3701-4251 101.20 6416 03/21/96 000159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI ELECT BILLINGS/JAN-FEB 96 001-4204-4303 7,063.42 ELECT BILLINGS/JAN-FEB 96 001-4202-4303 1,831.95 ELECT BILLINGS/JAN-FEB 96 105-2601-4303 76.36 ELECT BILLINGS/JAN-FEB 96 160-3102-4303 101.64 ELECT BILLINGS/JAN-FEB 96 105-2601-4303 197.50 ELECT BILLINGS/JAN-FEB 96 001-3104-4303 787.44 ELECT BILLINGS/FEB-MAR 96 105-2601-4303 22.74 6417 03/21/96 000442 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI ST LITE BILLING/MAR 96 ST LITE BILLING/FEB 96 ST LITE BILLING/MAR 96 ST LITE BILLING/MAR 96 6418 03/21/96 000170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS BILLING/JAN-FEB 96 GAS BILLING/JAN-FEB 96 6419 03/21/96 000884 SOUTHWEST REGIONAL TRNG TUITION/L. HEARD 6420 03/21/96 000115 SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE C DWTN AREA MAINT/FEB 96 6421 03/21/96 003479 SPORTMART COM RES PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6422 03/21/96 007051 ELWIN STEMIG WORK GUARANTEE REFUND ASSESSMENT REBATE 6423 03/21/96 000897 VAL STRASER EXPENSES REIMB./STRASER 6424 03/21/96 007054 JILL LUANN THOMPSON REFUND OF CITY FEE REFUND TOW FEE 6425 03/21/96 000124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY PLUMBING SUPP/FEB 96 PLUMBING SUPP/FEB 96 6426 03/21/96 007053 LEONARD TREADWELL CITE PYMT REFUND 6427 03/21/96 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 105-2601-4303 185.08 105-2601-4303 1,518.02 105-2601-4303 7,435.35 105-2601-4303 17.89 001-4204-4303 117.34 001-4204-4303 84.30 001-2101-4312 210.00 109-3301-4201 2,795.00 001-4601-4308 48.66 001-2110 1,600.00 105-3105 37.98 001-2101-4317 104.42 001-3841 38.00 110-3302 69.50 160-3102-4309 211.18 001-3104-4309 84.48 110-3302 2.00 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/FEB 96 105-2601-4309 171.39 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/FEB 96 160-3102-4309 113.78 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/FEB 96 001-3104-4309 138.66 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/FEB 96 001-4202-4309 209.27 HARDWARE SUPPLIES/FEB 96 001-4204-4309 282.95 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 001-2021 101.78 462.81; 101.204 10,081.05 9,156.34 201.64 210.00 2,795.00 48.66 1,637.98`'' 104.42 107.50 295.66 2.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 03/21/96 15:08 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 9 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT DISCOUNTS TAKEN 6428 03/21/96 007052 TSENG & ASSOCIATES AB939 CONTRACT REVIEW 6429 03/21/96 004091 UNITED STATES POSTAL SE RESET POSTAGE METER/FEB 96 6430 03/21/96 004768 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE COMPUTER MAINT/MAR 96 6431 03/21/96 001938 V & V MANUFACTURING DET SGT BADGE LT BADGES & CASES/P.D. 6432 03/21/96 007055 CECILIA VAUGHN CITE PYMT REFUND 6433 03/21/96 007059 WALKER PARKING CONSULTA DOWNTOWN PARKING STUDY 6434 03/21/96 007056 BETTY WARNHOLZ ASSESSMENT REBATE 6435 03/21/96 006834 THE WEARHOUSE MOTORCYCLE HELMET 6436 03/21/96 000141 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 96 PENAL CODES CODE UPDATES 6437 03/21/96 001376 WALTER E. WILMOT ASSESSMENT REBATE 6438 03/21/96 007057 LEO WOODS ASSESSEMENT REBATE 001-2022 117-5301-4201 001-1208-4305 001-1206-4201 001-2101-4187 001-2101-4187 110-3302 109-8160-4201 105-3105 001-2101-4187 001-2101-4305 001-1121-4201 101.78 540.00 2,008.00 211.00 56.19 159.84 2.00 2,450.00 37.98 189.44 239.23 139.82 105-3105 37.98 105-3105 37.98 6439 03/21/96 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-1141-4305 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-4601-4317 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-4601-4305 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-2201-4309 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-2101-4312 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-2101-4305 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-1208-4305 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-4101-4317 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-1206-4317 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-4202-4317 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-4204-4309 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-4201-4201 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-4101-4305 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 160-8408-4201 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-4601-4317 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 160-3102-4309 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-1201-4305 PETTY CASH REIMB FR 2/26-3/7 001-1201-4317 6441 03/21/96 0Q7058 HAZEL WRIGHT ASSESSMENT REBATE 6442 03/21/96 000135 XEROX CORPORATION 10.75 8.00 2.00 6.44 52.50 26.89 36.41 35.00 39.00 97.54 9.74 12.29 10.75 25.81 12.00 43.50 16.13 20.00 105-3105 37.98 COPIER METER USE/JAN-FEB 96 001-1208-4201 408.14 916.05 540.00 2,008.00 211.00 216.03 2.00 2,450.00, 37.98 189.44 379.05 37.98 37.98 464.75 37.98 408.14 TOTAL CHECKS 263,292.03 VOUCHRE2 03/21/96 15:08 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 84,155.95 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 14,055.60 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 6,011.99 110 PARKING FUND 1,486.49 117 AB939 FUND 540.00 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 40,072.15 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 101.20 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 12,093.34 160 SEWER FUND 12,714.00 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 14,106.88 705 INSURANCE FUND 47,064.54 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 30,889.89 TOTAL 263,292.03 PAGE 10 VOUCHRE2 03/21/96 15:08 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES TO // INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR ZYR/ 9{p ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY eI QV _ 444.► FINANCE DIRECTTOR DATE b'07//GP PAGE 11 April 4, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ica-c-/EdL(A4 Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS April 23,1996 Text Amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 7 to add a section in regards to require protective coating of metal handrails. (Continued from meeting of March 26, 1996) Community Development Director Downtown Streetscape/Lower Pier Avenue Construction City Manager Hydrology Master Plan Public Works Director Amendment to Fire Flow Ordinance Fire Chief Text amendment to the Municipal Code to simplify the language of the encroachment permit code Public Works Director Recommendation to deny claims Risk Manager April 30, 1996 7:00pm JOINT MEETING: CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION May 14, 1996 Drainage Acceptance Agreement Public Works Director Revision to encroachment ordinance regarding 30th & 31st Streets Public Works Director Public Works Fees Public Works Director Lease renewal: Project Touch (Room 3) Community Resources Director Lease renewal: South Bay Free Clinic (Room 7) Community Resources Director Recommendation to deny claims Risk Manager May 23, 1996 BUDGET STUDY SESSION - 7:OOPM May 28, 1996 Monthly Activity Reports - April, 1996 All Departments Recommendation to deny claims Risk Manager June 6, 1996 BUDGET STUDY SESSION - 7 OOPM 1 c A.- %-5799 March 27, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1996 APPROVAL OF CROSS WALKS AND HANDICAP RAMPS CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS FOR FUNDS TDA ARTICLE 3 FUNDS FOR FY 1995 - 96 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve and adopt Resolution No. 96- ,a resolution of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. A. Approving the application for discretionary regional funds for the construction of cross walks and handicap ramps at various locations in the City. Background: The purpose of this project is to construct cross walks and handicap ramps at various locations as needed to comply with the Americans with Disability Act (ADA). There is an opportunity to receive funds in an amount of $7,010 to fund a portion of the construction cost of cross walks and handicap ramps project through TDA, Article 3 discretionary funds. Analysis: TDA Article 3 discretionary funds will be available County -wide for bikeway and pedestrian projects of regional significance. These regional funds will be allocated at the discretion of the Commission for new construction, pedestrian facilities, or for off- street bikeway maintenance. Such discretionary funds allocated to new facilities must be spent within two years of allocation, unless a one year extension is granted by Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Fiscal Impact: None at this time, as no funds are being expended. This is an application for funding. id 1 Alternative: An alternative to City Council is: 1. Do nothing: Thereby, allowing available funds to lapse to the'County. Respectfully submitted, Ha».eehG,....oe• Homayoun Behboodi Concur: 1,1 amilaA,0 Amy Amirani Capital Improvement Program Engineer Public Works Director Attachments: Resolution No. 96 2 Steph=iiT'-. Burrell City Manager s rl/c/res o f ut/h a n d i ca p 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUNDS UNDER SB 821 AND APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF ITS BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN PLAN. WHEREAS, SB 821 provides that 2% of each county's total local Transportation Fund be annually set aside and used to fund the development of bicycle and pedestrian facilities; and WHEREAS, THE City of Hermosa Beach desires to construct and maintain cross walks and handicap ramps within their city utilizing, in part, the funds available under SB 821. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does resolve as follows: 1. To adopt construction of handicap ramps and cross walks in conformance with the Americans with Disability Act; 2. To authorize the Director of Public Works as the City's authorized signature and designated contact person; 3. To apply for all funds available to the City of Hermosa Beach allocated for Bikeways and Pedestrian facilities (SB 821(; -1- 1 4. To maintain, or cause to be maintained in safe condition, all facilities whose construction is wholly or partially funded by the requested allocation of SB 821 funds. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of April, 1996 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach , California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM City Clerk City Attorney srl.c. resolut.resohand -2- } April 1, 1.996 Honorable Mayor and Members of 'regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1996 MUNICIPAL STORMWATER/URBAN RUNOFF PILOT PROJECT RECOMMENDATION: It is Recommended that: 1. The City Council approve the agreement between the City of Santa Monica and City of Hermosa Beach, to form a multi, jurisdiction consortium to evaluating the effectiveness of existing practices and devices for controlling urban runoff pollutants at catch basins. 2. Authorize the mayor to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: On October 10, 1995 the Mayor and City Council approve a contribution in the amout of $5,000 to the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project Foundation for evaluating the effectiveness of existing and prototypical practices and devices for controlling urban runoff pollutants at catch basins. ANALYSIS: The principal permittee for (NPDES) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, (Los Angeles County), and co -permittees, (South Bay Cities, Caltrans, and the City of Los Angeles), have kicked off the formation of a consortium which would oversee the pilot project. The pilot project, aimed at identifying existing catch mechanisms for storm drain pollution control, will collect and evaluate data from existing catch basins and will recommend implementation of new catch basin design. Finally, the pilot project will evaluate the feasibility for the broad application. This pilot project will be prepared by a qualified consultant under a contract with the Santa Moncia Bay Restoration Project Foundation. The Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project Foundation will request letters of interest from qualified consultants for preparation of a pilot project. It is anticipated that preparation of a pilot project will cost approximately $250,000. There is a $100,000 grant administered by the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project for the State Water Resource Control Board with the proviso that $150,000 shall be raised among consortium members. Commitments to fund the pilot project have been made by the following Permittees, le (consortium members): County of Los $25,000; City of Los Angeles $25,000; City of Santa Monica $25,000; Culver City $20,000; Caltrans $20,000; City of West Hollywood $10,000; City of Hermosa Beach $5,000; City of Redondo Beach $5,000; City of El Segondo $5,000; City of Manhattan Beach $5,000; City Rolling Hills Estates $3,000; City of Rancho'Palos Verde's $2,000; City of Torrance $2,000 City of Palos Verde's Estates $1,000; and City of Rolling Hills $1,000. FUNDING: The City of Hermosa Beach currently has budgeted $75,000 for compliance with the NPDES Stormwater permit. On October 10, 1995 the City Council authorized $5,000 of these funds be allowed to fund the pilot project for the Los Angeles County NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit through a contribution to the Santa Moncia Bay Restoration Project Foundation. Respectfully Submitted, Concur: Oft OP`M\s\O-At Homayoun Behboodi Amy Amira Capital Improvement Program Engineer srl/a/npdes/pilot Director of Public Works/City Engineer Stephen R. urrell City Manager Benz Air Engineering Co. 07 -Apr -96 17:43 page 2 of 3 _ v To: Robin Bennett, City of Hermosa Beach r/r" D To: City Council From: Robert Benz PE M25309 Memorandum Subject: Request for funding fr the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project. Staff is requesting funding for Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project. These funds will be used to pay for a study on storm water and possible mitigation measures. Unfortunately, this study will do nothing to mitigate storm water pollution. Instead of funding another study, I am proposing an alternative consisting of a storm water diversion project. The sketch below illustrates a simple and inexpensive project which will divert low flow storm water to the sanitary sewer. The project would be ideal for the Pier area. The project would eliminate the current prohibition against sidewalk washing in the area served by this catch basin, further reducing runoff pollution during rainy periods. The proposal consists of a catch basin, similar to the design below. A sump pump (or several) would operate whenever the sump is filled with 7" of water. The fetid fluid would be pumped to an adjacent sanitary sewer. High flow resulting from substantial rain would run into the catch basin and out the ocean outfall, cleaning the catch basin of debris accumulated during low flow periods. Sump pumps are less than $80, complete with an automatic float switch. In addition to providing an actual mechanism for the cleanup of Santa Monica Bay, this project could offer an alternative to the waste of money in funding useless studies. Sto in To Sanitary Sewer Ocean outfall r Sump pump Sump pump has automatic float switch. Each sump pump has capacity of 35 GPM rnct tan Sloping exit to ocean outfall will allow natural cleaning of the sump during 1 runoff periods. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION u April 2, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 KIWANIS HOLIDAY TREE LOT AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council approve the use of the Community Center lawn by the Kiwanis Club to operate a Christmas tree lot for the 1996 holiday season. Background The Kiwanis Club has operated this lot for eight years on the Community Center lawn (southeast portion) and each year Council has approved this request. The sale will be a fundraiser for the Kiwanis Club and will also benefit the Community Center Foundation's improvement fund for the Community Center. The Kiwanis Club agrees to donate $1,000 or 10 percent of their net profits, whichever is higher, to the Community Center Foundation. Analysis The following list of terms will be in effect for the 1996 season: • The location of the trees shall be on the east lawn of the Community Center; • The area can be fenced in and lighted; • Temporary signs can be installed on the front lawn; • Kiwanis will assume all costs for restoring the area back to its original state, with the Public Works Department approving all work; said work to be completed by January 15, 1997; • Kiwanis will be allowed to have a camper on 11th Place for 24 hour security purposes; • Kiwanis will pay to the City any other costs incurred by the City with regard to this project; • Kiwanis may occupy the site from November 11, 1996 through January 2, 1997; • Kiwanis will provide liability insurance in the amount of $1 million (consistent with leases); • The City will waive the temporary power pole permit fee($36). The Kiwanis Club has proven over the years to be responsible and cooperative with all City requirements and requests. The lot has proven to have minimal negative impact on the condition of the lawn and on the smooth operation of the Community Center. if I The Kiwanis Club will present the Community Center Foundation with a check for $2,121.12 at tonight's Council meeting from the 1995 lot proceeds. Fiscal Impact: None Attachment: 1. Letter of Request Concur: Mary C. Commu ty Resources Director Stephen R. Burr City Manager Respectfully Submitted,ubp GL2�i Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. Kiwanis Club of Hermosa Beach Post Office Box 121 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 City Council City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA. 90254 03/ 25/ 96 REF: Kiwanis Christmas Tree Lot Dear Council : The Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club would like to request the repeat of this, our major fund raiser of the year. We would like the same terms and conditions as last year including last years changes. We have worked well with staff and the project should continue to grow, but because of some unexpected expenses this years contribution is a bit lower than last year. We anticipate a much better season next year which will increase our contribution to the Community Center Foundation. We hope to continue this project. Sincerely, "77 e -rte. Paul F. Amarillas Kiwanis Tree Chairman April 1, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the following events for the 1996 season and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached contracts: Event 1. IMG - International Volleyball Tournament 2. A Day at the Beach Triathlon - Sprint Triathlon 3. Evian Volleyball Challenge '96 - Junior Tournament Dates June 20-23 October 13 April 28* *A special youth event to be held in conjunction with the WPVA Women's Pro Tournament. Background Each year the City hosts a number of commercial and special events. The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission serves as the first approval stop for these events prior to Council review. At the February 21, 1996 meeting, the Commission reviewed and approved five commercial events and contracts. These events were approved at the March 12, 1996 Council meeting. 1MG and Michael Epstein Sports Productions were unable to attend the Commission meeting in February. As such, the Commission voted to reschedule these events for consideration and approval at their March meeting. The WPVA event contract was approved at the March 12, 1996 Council meeting. i Contract provisions allow for the addition of special events with approval from the City. Evian has added preview events to the WPVA tour to benefit Heal the Bay and to build excitement for the pro tournament. The proposed Junior Tournament is one of them. Analysis Attached you will find a table estimating fees for the events. It is notable that the IMG tournament was originally scheduled to occupy the beach over four (4) weekends. In response to Council and Commission concerns, their schedule has been shortened to encompass June 10-27, reducing their impact substantially (now they will cover only two (2) weekends). As Council is aware, the DEC indicated a strong desire to work with event operators to expand the use of the venues and to be more inclusive of the downtown area. Staff has added provisions in the contract to encourage cooperative efforts on the part of event operators and to expand event presence on lower Pier Avenue. The Commission voted to encourage IMG to use the lots for VIP parking rather than the meters if at all possible. IMG plans to reserve the private lot located adjacent to Good Stuff for trailers and work vehicles and would request the use of Pier Avenue west of Beach Drive for additional VIP parking. As Council may recall, the IMG event featured the "Vollesium" stadium which was one of the most impressive set-ups in the history of beach events. The international focus of the tournament brought press from around the world to Hermosa Beach and provided a strong presence in our motels, shops and restaurants. The addition of this event to the annual line-up adds much to the prestige of our beach as a first class sports venue. The "Day at the Beach Triathlon" in its 5th year, brings an event to the City that is focused more on participation than spectators. The Sprint Triathlon attracts a number of Hermosa Beach residents who may participate in only one event of this type per year. The operations and race route are refined each year, with 1995 being the best year yet from an operations standpoint. MESP has proven to be an extremely responsive operator and has worked diligently with the City to improve the race route operation. It is noteworthy that this is an off-season event, stretching our season to October. The Evian Junior Volleyball Challenge will provide an exciting venue for local youth teams to participate in. The impact of this one day event will be minimal with set-up and tear -down scheduled for the event day. A contract is not included for this event as it is covered in the original contract with the WPVA approved by Council at the March 12, 1996 meeting. Once approved, these events will join the five (5) others approved by City Council to create another year of exciting and prestigious sports events in the City. • IFiscal Impact: $43,113 Fees paid to General Fund (revenue) 1 Attachments: A: Fee and Event Table B. Site Plans/Contracts C. WPVA Special Event Information Respectfully Submitted, unity Resources Director Concur: Stephen R. Bu City Manager Val Straser Chief of Police ATTACHMENT A TABLE OF ADDITIONAL SPECIAL EVENTS FOR 1996 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: ADDITIONAL 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS APPLICANT WPVA IMG MESP EVENT/ YEAR Evian VB Challenge '96 NEW EVENT INTERNA- TIONAL VB 2ND YEAR SPRINT TRIATHLON 5TH YEAR EVENT DATES APRIL 28, 1996 JUNE 20-23, 1996 OCT 13, 1996 SET-UP NONE JUNE 10-17 OCT. 12 TEAR -DOWN NONE JUNE 24-27 NONE EVENT CATEGORY CATEGORY I CATEGORY III CATEGORY II REQUESTING ADMISSION CHARGES? NO YES: $4,000 MIN. OR 25% GROSS -CITY NO SHUTTLE BUS SERVICE? NO YES • NO INSURANCE $1 MILLION $2 MILLION $2 MILLION FILMING NO YES NO SEASON OFF SEASON SUMMER OFF-SEASON FEES (EST.): PERMIT SET-UP POLICE (TBD) FIRE/PM(TBD) CR STAFF ADMISSION FILM PERMIT BUSINESS LIC BANNER CO-SPONSOR METERS AMP. PERMIT TOTAL $1,627 NA NA NA $200 NA NA NA NA NA NA 38 $1,865 $13,016 $2,400 $6,574 $2,784 $1,200 $4,000 $1,084 $233 $201 $500 $2,480 $38 $34,510 $1,790 $200 $2,151 $464 $200 NA NA NA NA $500 $1,395 $38 $6,738 Revised 4/1/96 Attachment A ATTACHMENT B SITE PLAN AND CONTRACT INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT JUNE 20-23, 1996 TITLE SPONSOR BUD LIGHT The Bud Light Invitationals will serve as a final test for the international Olympic competitors prior to the start of the Olympic contest on July 17, 1996. The qualifying rounds will be held on June 18-19 and the tournament will start on June 20 and run through the 23rd. PIER FIVB WORLD BEACH LAYOUT - HERMOSA MENS TENT INNS TOPAT TV Players Le+npe COURT AREA SVS [ ti: - DOA tEPOISS SE TOWERS AWING Cwt Mg 'Ale Tr TSLANT AWNING �YD�ED,s�EA, T�SR!1 U u DRAY MCH } VOLUSEUM ORME (KAM Level) PRESS Aa x teem toanasseant YE R. AVE Team. II Mar owe P COYE11EE117Er1 ,tSq �qn f CONCESSIONS Vr-Ind Raw aA• X x 1= owr ..3 t I 1 1 1 I �- OPEN DECK } T.tNA`�COMMIS ANN Tea:.. LIST[ TOILET NA WOMESTS TENT PLAYERS AREA 2 TOWER ENTRY ARCH ] TOWER USYBA YeYnMars KEY D 5' 1M e5, RtltWad Amen SCALE inch - fA fest COURT R BAITER AREA 115. IS THE STRAND THE STRAND • 1 INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on April 9, 1996, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP (IMG), a sporting events promoter and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regards to a INTERNATIONAL BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT on JUNE 20-23, 1996. FEES Event fee shall be $13,016 plus set up/tear down fee of $200 per day. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the CITY. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the CITY. ADMISSION FEES The City of Hermosa Beach will be provided with a fee scale chart two (2) weeks prior to the Tournament. IMG agrees to pay the City of Hermosa Beach $4,000 or 25 percent of the gross admission revenue, whichever is greater. IMG agrees to furnish records and make payment of $4,000 to the City of Hermosa Beach two (2) weeks prior to the Tournament and make additional payments, if applicable within two (2) weeks after the toumament. IMG may charge admission for up to 25 percent of stadium seating. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to audit any and all financial records of IMG specific to priority seating for the Tournament. The City of Hermosa Beach will receive a final copy of the Tournament revenue and expenditures in regards to priority seating ticket sales within seven (7) days of the end of the Tournament. SECURITY The CITY of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of IMG. IMG shall provide no less than ten security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. 1 The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the CITY's alcohol ordinance. The CITY of Hermosa Beach shall provide officers for the event as follows: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday 1 Officer; Friday and Saturday 1 Sergeant and 2 Officers; and Sunday 1 Sergeant and 4 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by Chief of Police. The CITY shall provide two (2) Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. Cost of officers and fire/paramedic personnel shall be assumed by IMG. CLEAN-UP IMG shall use a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: • The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street • Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the CITY each day of the Tournament. IMG shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: • Beach (impacted area) • Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. IMG shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 30 yard roll -off on 13th Street at Beach and six (6) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side or as determined necessary by City staff. IMG shall take necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. IMG shall make arrangements for such bins. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES IMG shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles aunty Department of Beaches and Harbors. If IMG desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by IMG. INSURANCE Ten (10) days prior to the event, IMG shall provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. IMG insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to 2 contribute. Said insurance's shall not be canceled or terminated without at least ten (10) days written notice to the CITY. IMG agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of IMG its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include any and all areas occupied or affected by the event. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY's alcohol ordinance shall be required by IMG. CITY staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for postings. CITY shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of IMG. CITY shall permit IMG to display two large replicas of their product. CITY staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. IMG shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY's alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by IMG to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of event promotion firm/sponsor. PARKING IMG shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs 48 hours in advance of event and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. IMG shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. IMG shall be required to make announcements indicating: 1) where there is free parking; and, 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. IMG shall provide a shuttle bus service from a major satellite point(s) on the outskirts of or outside of Hermosa Beach. IMG shall provide directional signs and advertisement which shall be approved in advance by the CITY. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue (Beach Drive to the Strand) for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may IMG block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. 3 In order to encourage beach events to grow to include a presence in the downtown area, the City welcomes event operators to use the Pier Avenue median (west of Hermosa Avenue to the Strand) for sponsor displays, special events, information, and other promotional purposes. Hermosa Beach merchants will be allowed to display wares and sell food and/or provide outdoor dining in front of their stores. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RIGHTS/RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY reserves the right to use the stadium for civic or recreational events or activities. The CITY shall allow IMG the opportunity to sell official IMG tournament concession items pursuant to certain conditions: • No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted; and, • All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS IMG RESPONSIBILITIES IMG shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by City staff. IMG shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. IMG shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such a Tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Department of Community Resources. IMG shall set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on scheduled days. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAYOR Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Date 4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR Date INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS Date ATTEST: CITY CLERK Date 5 ATTACHMENT B MICHAEL EPSTEIN SPORTS PRODUCTIONS A DAY AT THE BEACH TRIATHLON OCTOBER 13, 1996 TITLE SPONSOR MET -RX This is the 5th year that this event has taken place in Hermosa Beach and it will consist of a sprint triathlon, volleyball tournament, snow shoe sand races and mountain bike sand drags. They will use the Beach, Strand, Hermosa Avenue and Valley Drive. 1996 SPECIAL EVENTS A DAY AT THE BEACH TRIATHLON PARKING REQUESTS OCTOBER 13, 1996 VIP / STAFF/ RACE ROUTE Triathlon: Route • Hermosa Ave: Pier to Herondo west side only 5:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. 10/13 Pier Ave. Strand to Beach. 6:30 a.m. 10/12 to 6:00 p.m. 10/13 Total Spaces 111 12 Pier Ave: Beach to Hermosa Midnight 10/12 to 9:30 a.m. 10/13 35 MESP Staff / VIP Allright Parking Lots C (13th) or A (11th) 10/13 15 1 C!) Eli 0 ba [27 . • 0 -4\4 61 .•-•*;;I:-----4 8 73t) "sp 147 1)1 kb •i/ ,. t ... .. *-‘ —4 #4-40451 . Ijil 011 4.o.L•Jiltf.61 ) hf,. oi t. t ').' ZI1„ ?sem � ���•, �;• i ee 0 .... Iii v. s SO Ai ij 0•00-0 CI A 'vE s i rq A ISN'i ort Avg c,ssvld uv?/ 1,11111411111,1W toyd !fut/V4- 1 J 0 S'cut 0 Shcat ."") 0 0 1 ,Sfj1/1; I) (is it Conits (lo 1042t Sive /0,f /0 13(.143 00 Sc 1,11 yolk kh4 -6(ygts ) 6i 0,s 6 FeNce1r,,,i, posll: ! / : V , 77: LA, st4it. J. /a)':`i 6A ar-?sa.a wt) O) -- 0 -nog IIOO D �1 `yan ani b hro9 Cl DcI 2 _},a. ,a -9S) (A,I)a H 1 1 MICHAEL EPSTEIN SPORTS PRODUCTIONS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on April 9, 1996, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between the MICHAEL EPSTEIN SPORTS PRODUCTIONS (MESP), a sporting events promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to A DAY AT THE BEACH TRIATHLON to be held on October 13, 1996. FEES Event fee shall be $1,790 plus set up fee of $200 per day. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the CITY. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the event. All unanticipated costs incurred by the CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the CITY. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of MESP. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide 13 Officers (average of 2-3 hours) for the event beginning at 7:30 a.m. or as many officers as deemed necessary by the Chief of Police. The CITY may require MESP to provide additional security guards and the cost shall be borne by MESP. The CITY shall provide two (2) Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. Cost of officers and fire/paramedic personnel shall be assumed by MESP. CLEAN-UP MESP shall use a professional maintenance service to clean the area following the event and provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: Pier Avenue (impacted area) Beach (impacted area) Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. MESP shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 30 yard roll -off on 13th Street at Beach and six (6) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side or as determined necessary by CITY staff. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES MESP shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The County shall have the authority to cancel or re-route the swim portion of 1 the race depending on surf conditions. The CITY requires written confirmation from the County on the number of Lifeguards needed to ensure maximum safety for the swim portion of the event. The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If MESP desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by MESP. INSURANCE Ten (10) days prior to the event, MESP shall provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 days notice in writing to the City and County. MESP insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. Said insurance's shall not be canceled or terminated without at least ten (10) days written notice to the CITY. MESP agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of MESP its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. All participants will be required to show waivers on behalf of the CITY. MESP will assume full responsibility for ensuring the waivers are signed by said participant and shall assume cost for reproduction of waivers. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include all areas occupied or affected by the event. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING The City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for the event. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of MESP. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, deemed necessary by MESP to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of MESP. PARKING MESP shall be required to direct participant parking in CITY lots through advertising and race flyers. MESP shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs along the race course where appropriate 48 hours in advance of event and be responsible for the removal of signs on event day. MESP shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. All costs to reserve parking will be paid by MESP. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for event staging area. At no time may MESP block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. 2 SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the contracted event. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RIGHTS/RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall allow MESP the opportunity to sell official MESP concession items per certain conditions. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS MESP RESPONSIBILITIES MESP shall notice all affected residents and businesses of race. CITY staff shall determine areas to be noticed. MESP shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by City staff. MESP shall provide adequate detour signs to identify alternate driving routes through the City. MESP shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such an event. Event shall be conducted in compliance with the City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Department of Community Resources. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Approved as to Form: City Attorney Department of Community Resources Director Michael Epstein Sports Productions Director of Operations ATTEST: City Clerk 3 Date Date Date Date Date ATTACHMENT C WPVA SPECIAL EVENT INFORMATION EVIAN VOLLEYBALL CHALLENGE '96 APRIL 28, 1996 WM TOUR SUEDE February 3 Evian Indoor, Patriot Center, Fairfax,VA February 24 Evian Indoor, Madison Square Garden, NewYork, NY April 5-7 Deerfield Beach, Florida' April 27-28 Carolina Beach, Puerto Rico* May 3-5 Hermosa Beach, California* May 18-19 San Diego, California* May 31 June 2 Austin,Texas• June 15-16 The Evian U.S. Open, Ocean City, Maryland* June 29-30 Newport, Rhode Island` July 13-14 Chicago, Illinois* July 20-21 Long Beach, California* August 8-11 Evian Invitational, New York City, New York* August 16-18 The Evian National Championships, Huntington Beach, California" August 24-25 Portland, Oregon' September 14-15 Kauai, Hawaii* September 28-29 San Francisco, California* 'Official Tour Stops WHO IS HEAL THE BAY Founded in 1985 to fight for a "swimmable, fishable Bay", Heal the Bay is a non-profit advocacy group of more than 10,000 members working for a safe and healthy Santa Monica Bay.We use research, education, community action and policy programs to achieve this goal. Now in our second decade, Heal the Bay continues to fight to enhance and restore Southern California beaches and costal waters for people and marine life. Used by almost everyone in Southern California, the beaches and costal waters are one of the region's most important natural resources.We consider our constituency to be everyone who fishes, jogs, bikes, swims, picnics or simply comes to enjoy the ocean view -millions of visitors in 1994 alone. evian volleyball challenge '96 in association with... vafte 0 ro _e evian. `kW// tour to benefit Heal the Bay. ■ evian. volleyball challenge '96 So you think you're good, huh? Well, come show us what you've got. We're looking for 48 of the best junior club, high school, and corporate volleyball teams in all of Southern California. WHAT The Evian Challenge '96 is a series of three women's volleyball tournaments.We're talking serious two -person beach volleyball.You know the rules.The only difference is that games will be to 12 points, and the tournaments will be setup with pool play. Four teams per pool.That way you get to play at least three games (but if you're really that good, you'll play in six!). Each tournament has sixteen teams, and you can have up to five players on a team.There's also a waiting list of four teams, and they'll get a chance to play if another team drops out. But, even if they don't get to play, they can get some pointers from local coaches and WPVA pros during a morning clinic being conducted especially for them. Either way, you can't lose. WHYEach tournament benefits Heal the Bay. Heal the Bay is an environmental group that works to protect the ocean and those great LA beaches where you'll be playing.To help them out, and to earn some good sports stuff, you can go out and get pledges from your neighbors, family, and friends. People can pledge based on the number of garnes your team plays, the number of points your team scores, and/or PRIZES Prizes will be given to each team member based on the total amount of pledges that team gets. Raise this amount $200 $1000 $2000 $5000 Receive an Evian cap an Evian sweatshirt a Brine volleyball all of the above Grand Prize:The club raising the most money will get to play in a pro celebrity exhibition match right after the Huntington Beach WPVA tournament! The corporate team raising the most money will play in a match against the pros just after the Long Beach WPVA tournament. WINNERS The winning club receives a $500 donation to their volleyball club from Evian and the WPVA! The winning corporate team receives airfare and accom- modations to San Francisco to watch the WPVA tourna- ment in September. WHEN, WHERE, AND WHO April 28, 9 00am-4:30pm July 19, 9:OOam-4:30pm August 16, 4:00pm-8:30pm Hermosa Beach Long Beach Huntington Beach Club Juniors High School Club Corporate Challenge HOW Registration is $80.00 per team, and each player gets a t -shirt and sun visor just for coming out to play. But sign up soon, because registration is first come, first serve. Only the first 16 teams to sign up will play in the tournament (plus four reserve teams). If you make the cutwe'II give you a call to let you know you're in LAST QUESTION Just how good are you? For more information call the Evian Hotline ..� 171A\ ASO -A120 CC ..a. CC z E Q� S 3 C t L U U c L C 4126 l z 0. p n 2 oco E u 3 sat 0 EVIAN VOLLEYBALL CHALLENGE '96 FACT SHEET- HEAMOSA BEACH What: The Evian Volleyball Challenge '96 is o series of three charity -driven volleyball tournaments. The first tournament takes place in Hermosa Beach, and it features 16 of the best girls junior club volleyball teams in all of southern California. Where: Hermosa Beach sandcourts (next to the Pier) When: Sunday April 28, from 9:00 am to 4:30 pm How: Registration is $80.00 per team, and each player (limit 5) receives a t -shirt and visor for participating. Why: Each team will solicit pledges to raise money for Heal the Bay, a local 'environmental group that works to preserve Santa Monica Bay and the surrounding beaches. All proceeds from the pledges and registration fees will go to Heal the Bay, less Evian's operating costs (Evian will not deduct more than 33% of the proceeds to cover their costs, and the total deducted will not exceed $7500. Also, Evian will not deduct anything if proceeds from the three tournaments do not exceed $10,000) Heal the Bay: Founded in 1985 to fight for a "swimmable, fishable Bay", Heal the Bay is o non- profit advocacy group of more than 10,000 members working for a safe and healthy Santa Monica Bay. They use research, education, community action and policy programs to achieve this goal. Now in their second decade, Heal the Bay continues to fight to enhance and restore Southern California beaches and coastal waters for people and marine life. Used by almost everyone in Southern Colifornio,•the beaches and coastal waters are one of the region's most important natural resources. They consider their constituency to be everyone who fishes, jogs, bikes, swims, picnics or simply comes to enjoy the ocean view- millions of visitors in 1995 alone. Format: The format is standard two -person beach volleyball. Each team can have up to Five players rotate in and out of o game. To ensure that each team gets to play a fair amount, we will use o pool play format, with four teams per pool. Each team in a pool plays three games (one against each of the members in its pool), and the team with the best record advances to the semi-finals. • Prizes: Prizes will be given to each team member based on the total amount of pledges that the team gets. Raise this amount Receive $200 an Evian cap $1000 an Evian sweatshirt $2000 a Brine volleyball $5000 all of the above Grand Prize: The club team raising the most money (from both the Hermosa and Long Beach Tournaments) will get to play in a pro -celebrity exhibition match right after a local WPVA tournament. Winners: The winning team from the Hermosa tournament receives a $500 donation to its volleyball club from Evian and the WPVA. Clinic: In addition to the tournament, each event will also feature an all day clinic run by local coaches, with assistance from a few of the WPVA pros. The morning portion of the clinic will be reserved for kids playing in the tournament, but the afternoon clinic will be open to the Hermosa Beach community- and it will be free of charge! Set-up/Tear-down: Because this is a small tournament and we will only be setting up two portable three -row bleacher sections and five or six tents, our set-up and tear -down will be very fast. We will need access to the strand for approximately 5-7 trucks. We will start at approximately 7:00 am, and set-up should be finished by 9:00 am. Tear - down will start immediately following the conclusion of the final match, and we should be gone by 7:00 pm. Our goal is to leave the beach cleaner than it was • when we arrived. For more information call Philip Green at (213) 851-8301 :VIAN VOLLEYBALL CHALLENGE '96 APRIL 28 et HERMOSA BEACH cZ AND 1•04 TICCX MOM.ao... I snow rto-+wielywOwtSWIMvnIip THE KERMOSA BEACH STRAND COATI Ansammo lemma oat arum est April2, 1996 Honozable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April9, 1996 1 COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE RATES Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve keeping the current lease rate of $.93 sq. ft. through fiscal year 1997-98 for rooms in the Community Center. Background Per the deed restrictions on the use of the Community Center property, non-profit agencies are the only groups permitted as tenants in the Center. The Commission is charged with setting these rates and has typically done so in 3 -year increments. In the past three (3) fiscal years, lease rates have been set as follows: July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994: July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995: July 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996: $.87 sq. ft. $.90 sq. ft. $.93 sq. ft. Recommendations for various rates have been calculated in the past by researching what the "going rate" is for commercial buildings (more specifically, older commercial buildings) in the area and by reducing these rates to account for the non-profit status. Analysis The Commission and staff recommend that the lease rate remain the same ($.93) for the next two (2) fiscal years 1996-97 and 1997-98 and then re-evaluate the lease rate at that time. The "low end" going rate for commercial buildings appears to be at approximately $1.15 sq. ft. lower than it was three (3) years ago ($1.25). On November 22, 1994 and July 25, 1995 Council approved two (2) three (3) year lease agreements at the $.93 sq. ft. rate (per year) for LA County. Taking this into consideration, keeping the present square footage rate would be equitable to all tenants. Staff has difficulty determining comparable rates for surrounding communities due to the fact that most do not lease to non-profit agencies. 1h Another appropriate measure for determining rates is the Consumer Price Index figure which has risen by only 1 percent as of November, 1995. Looking at the commercial rate and the CPI Index figures it does not seem to justify an increase at this time. Staff has given much consideration to the fact that the economy has impacted non-profit agencies with decreases in donations and grant funds and recommends that the rate stay at $.93 rate through June, 1998. For example, the South Bay Coalition has leased office space (Room 4) in the Community Center since 1987 but due to cuts in funding they will be going out of business the end of April, 1996. The City benefits greatly from the tenancy of the social service agencies in the Community Center. They not only provide vital social services to those in need but they also provide a vehicle for our residents to participate positively in their community as volunteers. Attached you will find a list of these agencies. Other alternatives available to Council include: 1. Reduce/increase recommended lease rates. 2. Recommend that the lease rates be tied to the CPI on an annual basis. 3. Request more information. 1Fiscal Impact: Estimated annual revenues: $103,676 1 Attachment: 1. List of Community Center Leases Respectfully submitted, Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Concur: Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Mary ' . -:.' ey Stephen Co unity Resources Director City Manager COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES LEASEE LOCATION/ROOM SQUARE FEET LEASE EXPIRES MONTHLY PAYMENT BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT ROOM 5 ROOM 6A 792 SF 132 SF 6/30/96 $859 . PROJECT TOUCH ROOM 3 529 SF 5/31/96 $492 DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES ROOM 6B 200 SF 6/30/96 5186 EASTER SEALS ROOM 14 920 SF 9/30/96 $856 ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS ROOM 1 ROOM 2 ROOM 15 720 SF 720 SF 720 SF 9/30/96 $2,195 • SOUTH BAY CENTER FOR COUNCELING ROOM 9 419 SF 9/30/96 $390 SOUTH BAY COALITION ROOM 4 798 SF 3/31/96 $742 SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC - ROOM 7 ROOM 11 1100 SF 400 SF 6/15/96 3/31/96 $1,395 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ROOM 16 ROOM 17 920 SF 920 SF 11/31/97 7/31/98 $1,712 HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION ROOM C 156 SF 6/30/96 FEES WAIVED i � s1 i PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 1996 MEETING i Roll Call Present: Chairperson Mitchell, Commissioners Abrams, Aronoff, Koppel Absent: Commissioner Peirce Staff: Rooney Approval of Minutes February 21, 1996 Motion: "To approve as submitted." Koppel/Aronoff All Ayes Matters for Commission Consideration 1996 Special Events IMG: International Volleyball Tournament Kathleen Waters of IMG addressed the Commission on behalf of the event. Motion: "To approve staff' recommendation to hold the IMG International Volleyball Tournament on June 20-23, 1996 and provide the City Council with a proposed map for VIP parking and to encourage VIP parking in lots rather than meters." Koppel/Aronoff Ayes: Koppel, Aronoff, Abrams No: Mitchell Notes: 1. Commissioner Mitchell's no vote was based on length of set-up and tear -down. Subsequent to the Commission meeting, IMG reduced their set-up and tear - down days to June 10 - June 27 (original request was from June 6 - June 30). 2. Add $4,000 minimum or 25 percent of gross (whichever is greater) for admission fees to contract. MESP: A Day at the Beach Triathlon Michael Epstein of MESP addressed the Commission on behalf of the event. • Motion: "To approve staff recommendation to hold the MESP Sprint Triathlon special event on October 13, 1996." Koppel/Abrams All Ayes South Park Phase II Study Motion: "To place on the high priority list for FY 1996-97: 1. Shade trees (mature) instead of shade structures as depicted on park plan; 2. Fencing for north side of park; 3. Picnic table(s) for Tot Lot area; 4. Light for pedestrian entrance on Loma; 5. Border for Tot Lot (small wood border)." Koppel/Abrams All Ayes Staff Note: Clear ice plant from Greenbelt adjacent to park crosswalk. Community Center Lease Rate Policy Motion: "To approve staff recommendation to keep the current lease rate at $.93 sq. ft. through fiscal year 1997-98 for rooms in the Community Center." Koppel/Abrams All Ayes Skateboarding at South Park Motion: "To recommend allowing skateboarding for a trial period since there will be more park supervision (with the roller hockey programs) available to monitor for any vandalism to park property." Abrams/Mitchell Ayes: Abrams, Koppel, Mitchell No: Aronoff Note: Commissioner Aronoff wished to consider developing a specific area in South Park for skateboarding. Motion to adjourn: Koppel/Aronoff All Ayes Adjourned: 9:55 p.m. April 3, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1996 RECOMMENDATION TO DENY CLAIM Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council deny the following claim and refer it to the City's Liability Claims Administrator. 1. Claimant : Victor, Stephani Date of Loss: 12/19/95 Date Filed : 03/28/96 Allegation : Alleges City negligence and dangerous condition on public property contributed to personal injuries. Copies of the claims are available in the Office of the City Clerk for review. In addition to the above, The City has received the following claims which have been resolved. 1. Claimant : Herman, Michael Date of Loss: 03/05/96 Date Filed : 03/13/96 Damage : Vehicle damaged by City Animal Control Officer, who jumped onto hood of car to escape a charging dog. Restitution is being sought from dog's owner. Disposition : City paid $470.94 for repair of vehicle. Respectfully Submitted, oncur: Robert A. Blackwood Risk Manager cc: Bill Fuentes, Colen & Lee mw/deny ephen R. Burrell City Manager 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VOr 3103 JOSEPH P. PIERRY, ESQ., (BAR NO: 136774) PIERRY & MOORHEAD, LLP 301 N. Avalon Boulevard Wilmington, California 90744 (310) 834-2691 (213) 775-8348 Attorneys for Claimant, STEPHANI LYNN VICTOR STEPHANI LYNN VICTOR, ) CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES ) Claimant, (Section 910 of the Government Code) ) vs. ) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ) ) a public entity, ) Respondent. ) ) ) TO: CLERK, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that STEPHANI LYNN VICTOR, whose address is 6148-1/2 Orange Street, Los Angeles, California 90048, claims damages from the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH in the amount of, computed as of the date of presentation of this claim in excess of $10,000,000 (Ten Million Dollars). This claim is based on personal injuries sustained by claimant on or about December 19, 1995, in the vicinity of Hermosa Avenue near the intersection of First Street, City of Hermosa Beach, California, under the following circumstances: Claimant, Stephani Lynn Victor, was a pedestrian standing on the sidewalk of Hermosa Avenue near the intersection of First Street, 11 Hermosa Beach, California, when she was struck by a motor vehicle and 2� pinned between that motor vehicle and another motor vehicle parked on 3� the sidewalk causing severe injuries to her legs, back, neck and head. 4 Claimant's accident and injuries were caused by the negligence and 5. carelessness of the City of Hermosa Beach, and its agents and employees 6 who failed to maintain, repair, construct, control the public property 7 in a safe condition; failed to keep unsafe areas posted with warning 8 devices; failed to have competent supervisory personnel to inspect for 9 any dangerous conditions; failed to have an adequate safety system or 10 measures in place; created and/or allowed a dangerous condition to exist 11, on said premises; failed to provide traffic and/or warning signals, 12 signs, markings and/or devices; and, failed to employ competent and 13 careful contractors. (Government Code, Sections 815, 815.4, 815.6, 830, 14 830.8, 835, 835.4). The City of Hermosa Beach and its agents and 15 employees knew or should have known of the existence of the dangerous 16 condition on said public property well prior to the happenings of 17 claimant's accident and negligently did not warn of said dangerous 18 condition. 19 The injuries sustained by claimant, Stephani Lynn Victor, as far as 20 known, as of the date of presentation of this claim are severe crushing 21 injuries to both legs resulting in amputation of both legs above the 22 knee, as well as injuries to her back, neck and head, including post 23 traumatic stress and emotional distress. 24 The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim, 25 is computed as follows: 26 Damages incurred to date: 27 Expenses for medical and hospital care - Unascertained 28 Loss of Earnings - Unknown 2 Special Damages Unknown 2 General Damages (in excess of) - $5,000,000.00 3 Total Damages Incurred to Date 4 (in excess of) - $5,000,000.00 5 Estimated prospective damages as far as known 6 Future expenses for medical and hospital care - Unascertained 7 Future Loss of Earnings - Unknown 8 Other prospective special damages Unknown 9 Prospective General Damages (in excess of) - $5,000,000.00 10 Total estimated prospective damages 11 (in excess of) - $5,000,000.00 12 Total Amount Claimed as of date of 13 presentation of this claim (in excess of) - $10,000,000.00 14 15 All notices or other communications with regard to this claim 16 should be sent to claimant at: Pierry & Moorhead, LLP, 301 North Avalon 17 Boulevard, Wilmington, California 90744. 18 19 Dated: March 25, 1996 PIERRY & MOORHEAD, LLP 20 21 By P. PIERRY 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A orneys for Claimant 3 rs :, April 3, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 NOTICING REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPORARY NO PARKING: SPECIAL EVENTS AND FILMING Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council amend the City policy with regards to posting meters and parking spaces for special events and filming with temporary No Parking Signs as follows: 1. Silver meters, parking lots and time limit spaces in the commercial and residential areas shall be posted at least 24 hours in advance. 2. Gold meters and non -metered spaces in residential areas shall be posted at least 72 hours in advance. Background In response to complaints from downtown businesses, the Chamber of Commerce requested that the issue of temporary no parking notification for special events be re- examined by the Council. The City does not currently have an ordinance in place requiring notification additional to the 24 hour towing requirement cited in the State Vehicle Code. The longer noticing requirements are identified in policies regarding special events and filming activities. Analysis As indicated in the attached letter, the current practice of 48 hour advance notification (the letter refers to 72 hours which is not the current policy) sends the wrong message to potential shoppers who may be discouraged by the No Parking signs often in place three (3) days in advance of an event. The extra day comes into play as the initial No Parking hour may be as early as 6:00 a.m. Workers typically post the night before a 6:00 a.m. deadline. In addition, City staff and event organizers are burdened with the task of replacing signs "torn -down" over the lengthy posting period. The recommended posting time for residential zones stems from earlier Council direction with regards to film activity and from 72 hour parking allowances in certain areas. In contrast to concerns from the businesses about early posting, residents have expressed support for advance noticing in their neighborhoods (in particular with regards to film activity). The 72 hour notice is essential in these areas because a resident is permitted to lk park for 72 hours consecutively without moving their vehicle. A resident who intended to leave a vehicle in a space for two (2) days (e.g., out of town) would not have an opportunity to read a 24 or 48 hour notice prior to a towing deadline. It is important to note that the City and event organizers make every effort to avoid towing vehicles and have only done so when it is a safety consideration or when it significantly hampers the operation of an event. Furthermore, the City and event organizers provide written notification to affected businesses and residents about upcoming events which identify event parking restrictions well in advance of the proposed 24 hour posting period (generally these notices are distributed at least one (1) week in advance of an event). With adequate event notice and a refined policy for parking, businesses should have less difficulty with posting requirements and staff administration will be simplified. Fiscal Impact: None 1 Attachments: 1. Letter from Chamber of Commerce Respectfully Submitted, Mary ' .: r ey Co unity Resources Director Concur: Imo' Stephen R. Bu , Val Straser City Manager Chief of Police elk HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 'March 18, 1996 Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Ordinance Regarding 72 -hour Advance Notice of Temporary No Parking Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: On behalf of the merchants downtown, we request -that the City Council re-examine the ordinance relative to the amount of advance notice required priort� special events that require no parking on city streets. While we agree that advance notification is'essential, we feel that the current 72 hours (3 days) prior to an event • is longer than necessary. During the first two days that the "Temporary No Parking" signs are posted, drivers either don't or can't read the signs and assume that the sign indicates "No Parking" -at the time'they are attempting to park. We would like the City Council to consider modification of the current ordinance to a lesser amount of advance notification time for these signs. It would seem that a 24-hour notice should be sufficient and would have a far less detrimental effect on our businesses. It would be appreciated if this issue could be included in the April 9,1996 City Council agenda for your consideration. Thank you for your continued support of our business community. Sincerely, Carol K. Duff Executive Director cc: Jerry Newton Mary Rooney, Director,' Dept. of Community Resources 1007 Hermosa Avenue • Hermosa Beach, California 90254 • (310) 376-0951 . FAX (310) 798-2594 April 4, 1996 Honorable Chairman and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1996 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO 95-96 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) INITIATED BY STAFF PURPOSE: AMENDMENT TO CDBG REIMBURSABLE CONTRACT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT TO REMOVE ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS TO THE DISABLED AT CITY HALL Recommendation Staff recommends the Mayor execute the attached amended contract as stipulated by the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission (CDC). Background July 19, 1994, the City approved a cooperation agreement with L. A. County for future block grant funding of proposed City projects. The City staff has subsequently submitted a request for funding for the City's American with Disabilities Act Compliance and Transition Plan, and the CDC has approved the project. On April 9, 1995, the City Council executed a Reimbursable Contract with the L.A. Co. Community Development Commission which allowed the expenditure of allocated funds through June of 1996. Analysis This amendment to the original executed contract will allow an extension of the time to June 1997 for the city to expend the approved allocation of $152,691. CONCUR: Sol : umenfel Communi D lector 3velopment Department Stephen R. B City Manager cdrem Michael Schubach Planning Director 11 Carlos Jackson Executive Director March 12, 1996 Community Development Commission County of Los Angeles 2 Coral Circle • Monterey Park • California 91755 • Tel: (213) 890-7001 Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Burrell: Commissioners Gloria Molina Yvonne Brathwaite Burke Zev Yaroslaysky Deane Dana Michael D. Antonovich RECEIVED MAR 1 4 1996 CITY MGR. OFFICE REQUEST FOR EXECUTION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REIMBURSABLE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 Enclosed for execution by your City's authorized signatory are four copies of a Community Development Block Grant Reimbursable Contract Amendment Number 1 for implementation of your City's community development project(s). Please return all four original signed copies of the contract, by April 26, 1996, to Lorraine Wright of my staff, at 2 Coral Circle, Monterey Park, California 91755. Once the contract has been fully executed, an original will be forwarded to you. If there are any questions, please contact Ms. Wright at (213) 890-7172. Sincerely, TERRY GONALEZ, Director Community Development Block Grant Division LW-95-relet Enclosures COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM REIMBURSABLE CONTRACT WITH PARTICIPATING CITY AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 CITY: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONTRACT NUMBER: 68294 THIS AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT made this first day of July, 1996, by the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter called the "County", and the City of Hermosa Beach, hereinafter called the 'Operating Agency". WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the County and the Operating Agency previously entered into a Community Development Block Grant Program Reimbursable Contract with Participating City, Contract Number 68294 dated July 1, 1995; and WHEREAS, County and Operating Agency desire to amend said Contract in order that Operating Agency may better implement the projects. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein, the parties agree that said Contract Number 68294 be amended as follows: 1. TIME OF PERFORMANCE is amended to show a completion date of June 30, 1997. 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT is amended to show a compensation amount of $297,906. This is an increase of $145,215 to the contract amount. 3. FINANCIAL CLOSE OUT PERIOD. The Operating Agency agrees to complete all necessary financial close out procedures required by the Executive Director or designee, within a period of not more than one hundred and twenty (120) calendar days from the expiration date of this Agreement. This time period will be referred to as the financial IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Operating Agency, through their duly authorized officers, have executed this amendment as of the date first above written. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By By Chair, Board of Supervisors Title ATTEST: ATTEST: JOANNE STURGES City Clerk Executive Officer Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By By APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO PROGRAM: DE WITT W. CLINTON County Counsel CARLOS JACKSON, Executive Director Community Development Commission of the County of Los Angeles By By Deputy Director, CDBG -2- 1 March 28, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 ALLRIGHT PARKING AGREEMENT Purpose: To obtain approval to open negotiations with Allright Cal., Inc. Background: The existing agreement expires on June 30, 1996. The overall downtown plan and future changes that have been planned will not be ready to implement until after the agreement ends on June 30, 1996. It would seem appropriate to negotiate with Allright Cal., Inc. to extend the agreement under terms that would allow flexibility for the City to move forward with these projects. The Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission also has this for an agenda item at their April 3rd meeting. Staff will meet with Allright Cal., Inc. and determine their interest in such an agreement and return to the City Council with a proposal for your review and approval. Recommendation: Direct staff to meet with Allright Cal., Inc. and return with a proposed agreement extension for your review and approval. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager ACTION MINUTES DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL CHAMBER April 3, 1996 6:00 P.M. 1. James H. Dewey 2. Jerry Newton 3. Dean Nota 4. Patricia Spiritus 5. Dallas Yost 1. Roll Call . Pledge of Allegiance 2. Public Comments: NONE 3. Consent Calendar 3.1 Approval of Minutes 3/6/96 3.2 Finance Report 3.3 Allright Parking Report 3.4 Upcoming Planning Commission Items JN: Removed 3.4 for discussion, BALANCE RECEIVED AND FILED 5:0 3.4: JN Motion to encourage Sangria Garden applicant to consider a pedestrian pass-through to Parking Lot A as part of building remodel. ACTION: APPROVED 5:0, 4. Calendared Items 4.1 Pier Project Update (Follow-up on $15,000 D.E.C. Contribution to Pier Design Competition) ACTION: RECEIVED AND FILED 5:0 4.2 Review of Downtown Maintenance Contract ACTION: CONTINUE FOR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S INPUT, 5:0 4.3 All -Right Parking Lease Expiration, What next? Commissioner's discussed whether or not audit needed ACTION: DIRECT STAFF TO RETURN WITH '95 VS '96 YEAR-TO-DATE REVENUE COMPARISON TO DETERMINE IF AUDIT DESIRED 4.4 Update on Downtown Revitalization Program - Parking/Circulation Study ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE 4.5 Review of In -Lieu Parking Program Discussed status of current program; guidelines for distributing D.E.C. 's banked fund for 20 in -lieu parking spaces; and Hennessev's request for DEC contribution for the Hennessey's roof -deck expansion ACTION: JN: MOTION 1, TO AMEND GUIDELINES FOR DISTRIBUTING BANKED IN -LIEU FUNDS TO ALLOW ALLOCATION FOR ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION IN DOWNTOWN; MOTION 2, TO RECOMMEND ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR THE 7W0 IN -LIEU SPACES NEED FOR THE HENNESSEY'S PROJECT, MOTION APPROVED 4:0 C �"c_) lri 4.6 Hiring Event Management Company(s) for Street Closures ACTION: REQUEST CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF STREET CLOSURE IN CONJUNCTION WITH 8/23-8/25 AVP EVENT, FOR SAT. AND SUN. AND TO AUTHORIZE D.E.C. TO ISSUE R.F.P. FOR EVENT MANAGEMENT CO./PROMOTER AND TO REQUEST STAFF TO RETURN WITH REPORT ON DEC AVAILABLE FUNDS 4.7 Banner Program Update ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE 5. Staff Items 6. Commissioner Items Commissioner discussion of items not on agenda 7. Tentative Future Agenda ADDED TO MAY AGENDA: • REVIEW THE CITY'S "NO PARKING" NOTIFICATION FOR STREET CLOSURE EVENTS • COOPERATIVE DEC/CHAMBER/MERCHANTS MEETINGS IN DOWNTOWN LOCATIONS • DOWNTOWN IDENTIFICATION SIGN ON P.C.H. • ROTATION OF CHAIR 8. Next Meeting May 1, 1996 9. Adjournment March 27, 1996 City Council Meeting April 9, 1996 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 96-1154 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM M-1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 330 AND 342 ARDMORE AVENUE AND INCLUDING 615 THIRD STREET (THE SE CORNER OF ARDMORE AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET) AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 96-1154, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of March 26, 1996, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Elaine Doerfling, City erk Noted: Stephen R. a;: rell, City Manager 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE 96-1154 AN ORDINANCE THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND '1'HE ZONING MAP FROM M-1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) TO R-2 (TWO—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 330 AND 342 ARDMORE AVENUE AND INCLUDING 615 THIRD STREET (THE SE CORNER OF ARDMORE AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET) AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 26, 1996, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for the subject Zone Change and made the following findings: A. The subject zone change will make the zoning consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. B. The subject properties are appropriate for residential use as they are surrounded by primarily residential uses and located in an area which is predominantly residential in character. C. The City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their environmental assessment/initial study, that this zone change will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a Negative Declaration NOW, THEREFORE, 1HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That certain property in the City of Hermosa Beach, legally described as lots 41, 42, and 43 and the easterly 30 feet of the westerly 90 feet of lots 44, 45, and 46 of Walter Ransom Companies Venable Place Tract, located at 330 and 342 Ardmore, and 615 Third Street, is hereby reclassified from M-1, Light Manufacturing to R-2, Two -Family Residential. /1/ -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Hermosa Beach, as adopted by the Cityof Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Appendix A, Zoning, Section 302, is hereby amended by changing the classification of the property referred to in Section 1 to R-2. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this23rd day of April, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -2- 4-01-0-722frieta y--9-9-6 April 2, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1996 SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: APPELLANT: PROJECT: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 95 - AND PARKING PLAN 95-5 4 & 8 PIER AVENUE PAUL HENNESSEY 1845 S. ELENA STREET REDONDO BEACH, CA JIM LISSNER, ET AL 2715 EL OESTE DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, 90254 TO EXPAND AN EXISTING RESTAURANT/TAVERN (`1iENNESSEY'S') WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT INTO THE ADJACENT EXISTING RESTAURANT SPACE TO THE WEST (CURRENTLY `DIANA'S') INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF A ROOF- TOP SEATING AREA. Recommendation To sustain the Planning Commission's approval, subject to conditions, by adopting the attached resolution. Background At their meeting of February 20, 1996, the Planning Commission approved the requested Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Plan by a vote of 5:0. PROJECT INFORMATION: ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: LOT SIZE: GROSS EXISTING FLOOR AREA (Including `Fish Market,"`Hennessey's,"`Diana's" FLOOR AREA TO BE CONVERTED: 1 C-2, Restricted Commercial General Commercial 4711.5 sq. ft. 4311.5 sq. Ft. 1806 sq. ft. ROOF -TOP SEATING AREA: 700 SQ. FT. PARKING: None ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Mitigated Negative Declaration' Hennessey's currently operates under a C.U.P. (P.C. Resolution 90-78) which was most recently amended in 1990 to clarify the allowed entertainment hours. The applicant is proposing to expand the existing Hennessey's Tavern (a bar and restaurant) into the adjacent restaurant space to the west (currently a restaurant - `Diana's'). While this is an expansion of the Hennessey's, the conversion of the interior space does not add any new interior square footage. The applicant also proposes to add a 700 square foot roof -top seating area which when added to the gross floor area of the existing buildings, causing the gross floor and seating area of the building to exceed the lot area by 300 square feet. Since the floor area/lot area ratio exceeds 1:1 additional parking is required pursuant to the City's and the Coastal Commission's parking requirements requiring a Parking Plan to accept fees in -lieu of required parking, or waiver of parking requirements. The project requires final approval by the Coastal Commission. Analysis The project includes an overall upgrade of the building and the facade, which will be done in conjunction with the required seismic retrofit. Overall, the project will result in the elimination of one on -sale ABC license and the upgrades will provide an attractive addition to lower Pier Avenue. The proposed conversion of the interior space includes substantial floor changes which increase the kitchen area; upgrade and increase the size of the bathrooms; and increase table seating area, while not increasing the size of the bar area. This will give the establishment the ability to operate as a restaurant and offer a wider variety of menu items. The proposed roof -top deck includes interior stair access through the main entry, and an emergency exit stair with panic hardware out to the Strand. The 700 square foot area would be open to the sky, but enclosed on three sides by a 5 -foot high glass viewing guardrail'; and by a 5 - foot height building wall on the east side. • The Parking Plan was required, as noted above, for the 300 square feet that will exceed the 1:1 floor area/lot area ratio. This results in a requirement for 2 parking spaces. The Commission approved the project subject to acceptance an in -lieu fee or in -lieu fee transfer of $12,000. The applicant has the option of paying the fee, or requesting the Downtown Enhancement Commission to transfer funds from their set-aside funds to the parking improvement fund, subject to final approval by the Council. The applicant's request to the D.E.C. will be discussed Wednesday, April 3, and their recommendation will be reported to the Council. For further analysis please refer to the attached minutes, staff report, and attachments. 2 CONCUR: Sol : lumenf: Id, D ector Community evelopment Department Stephen ' .: urrell City Mana:er Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution to sustain the Commission decision 2. Appeal correspondence 3. P.C. Resolution, Minutes 4. P.C. Staff Report with attachments i Ke obertson Associate Planner ' The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of January 18, recommended a Mitigated Environmental Negative Declaration, recommending that the potential noise from outside dining during evening and nighttime hours be mitigated by the provision of a sound barrier such as gJacs; and the prohibition of amplified music; and limitation of outdoor dining hours to 10:00 PM unless it was demonstrated that the nighttime standards in the noise ordinance would not be exceeded; and that parking impacts be mitigated by the in -lieu fee. The project was subsequently modified to specifically include a 5 -foot perimeter glass barrier, and included a noise analysis to demonstrate that limiting hours was not necessary. Therefore, the Planning Commission adopted the needed mitigation of noise, the prohibition of amplified music, was incorporated into the description of the project. KR/cc/sr8 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF 'lHE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AS AMENDED, AND A PARKING PLAN TO ACCEPT FEES IN -LIEU OF PARKING, TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING BAR AND RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT INTO THE ADJACENT BUILDING SPACE TO THE WEST AND TO ADD A ROOF -DECK, AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 4 & 8 PIER AVENUE, , LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY 75 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 45 FEET OF LOT 5, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 9, 1996, to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve the subject Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan and to consider oral and written testimony on the matter, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan at their meeting of February 20, 1996, and approved the request subject to conditions as contained in Planning Commission resolution 96-11, and; WHEREAS, after considering the decision of the Planning Commission and their record of decision, and the testimony at the public hearing, the City Council agrees with the Planning Commission, and agrees with the findings and the conditions contained within Planning Commission Resolution 96-11, which are incorporated herein by reference; NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH IN P.C. RESOLUTION 96-11 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1996, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 kr\c:\cc\rs 1301UP CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 96-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AS AMENDED, AND A PARKING PLAN TO ACCEPT FEES IN -LIEU OF PARKING TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING BAR AND RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT INTO THE ADJACENT BUILDING SPACE TO THE WEST AND TO ADD A ROOF -DECK, AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 4 & 8 PIER AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY 75 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 45 FEET OF LOT 5, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 20, 1996, to receive oral and written testimony regarding the requested amendment and Parking Plan to expand an existing restaurant and bar with on -sale alcohol and live entertainment and made the following findings: A. The applicant is proposing to remodel the interior of the adjacent existing building, previously used for a restaurant with beer and wine, for purposes of expanding an existing bar and restaurant with on -sale alcohol and live entertainment, and is proposing to add a roof -top deck and seating area; B. The additional parking required for this expansion is reduced to 65% of the amount of the floor area that exceeds a 1:1 F.A.R. as it is located within the Downtown Enhancement District (DED), and pursuant to Section 1152.5 of the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to the Certified Coastal Land Use Plan, as recently amended, development in the DED on building sites 10,000 square feet or less with 1:1 F.A.R. or less is excepted from parking requirements and the area that exceeds is reduced to 65% of parking required as supported by the following findings: 1. Fewer than 96,250 square feet of commercial development, including new buildings, expansions, and/or intensification of uses in the DED has received a Coastal Development Permit since November 1, 1994. 1 2. There is currently adequate parking to support the development and to provide 2 adequate beach parking. 3 3. A parking study recently completed for the downtown show the occupancy of the 4 parking spaces in the downtown is 90% or less during daylight hours on summer 5 weekends, and no more than 24,063 square feet of commercial development has 6 occurred since the study. C. The expansion of the existing restaurant/bar into a former restaurant is appropriate fort e 7 8 subject location and will be compatible with surrounding commercial activities along Pier 9 Avenue and in the downtown district; 10 D. Strict compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting from the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit. 11 F. The Planning Commission concurs with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's12 13 recommendation, based on their environmental assessment/initial study, that this 14 project will result in a less than significant impact on the environment with the 15 mitigating conditions of the resolution incorporated into the project, and therefore 16 qualifies for a Negative Declaration 17 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING P O A CONDITCOIONAL ONAL 19SION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY USE PERMIT, AS AMENDED, AND PARKING PLN TOSALCOHOL AND ONE ALLOW EXPANSIN F 20 AN EXISTING BAR AND RESTAURANT WITH ON-SALE INTO THE ADJACENT BUILDING SPACE RESOLUTION 90-78HAD 91-52): • 21 (WHICH SUPERSEDE THE CONDITIONS OF P. C. 22 SEC_ I Specific Conditions of Approval 2 3 formance with 24 I. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conbythe submitted plans. Modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved 25 Community Development Director. 26 2. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 AM. and 2:00 AM. daily. 27 28 29 3. The business shall participate in the City's downtown parking validation program, 1 providing validations for parking in public lots for no less than two hours. 2 4. A in -lieu fee or fund transfer approved by the Downtown Enhancement fn 1 in -lieu Commissionproviding hall 3 be provided in the amount.of $12,000 to a parkingimprovement the required two additional parking spaces on site, prior to occupancy of the expanded 4 roof deck seating area. 5 5. Architectural treatment shall be as shown on buildingelevations of irectoubmitted plans and any 6 modification shall require approval by the Community Development a. Any roof -top equipment shall be integrated into the architecture and be hidden from 8 street view. 6. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department. 9 10 7. Final building plans/construction drawings includingola site, elevation,issuan�esh 11 be reviewed lan, sections, 11 details, landscaping and irrigation, submitted g P 12 for consistency with the plans approved by the Planning Commission and prior co tdi ions of this resolution, and approved by the Community Development Dir13 issuance of any Building Permit. 14 with acoustic features to maximize sound proofing which 8. The building shall be equipped 15 shall include the use of double -pane windows or an equivalent, and the installation of air 16 conditioning so that windows and doors can remain closed during performan lAny to comply additional acoustic treatment shall be provided in the interior if necessaryP Y 17 City's noise ordinance protective A minimum 5 -foot high solid lid barrier shall be provided and maintained on all 19 sides of the roof -top deck seating area, and amplified music or sound of any kind shall be 20 prohibited on the roof -top deck seating area. 5 21 10. The hours for live entertainment shall be limited to the hours bet eta 5en 9:00 P. Sundays A.M. Monday through Friday, and from 2:00 P.M. too5 22 and Federal and State Holidays, Cinco De Mayo, and St. Patrick's day. 23 the 11. Noise emanating from the property shall be within surrounding residential neighborhoods, 24 noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance the sh 25 and/or commercial establishments. Noise emanating from property compla Hall be monitored to verify compliance with the noise ordinance in response to any27 12. Management shall be responsible for the music/entertainment volume levels. 26 28 29 9 1 2 3 13. During the performance of amplified live entertainment, the exterior doors and windows --shall remain closed. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION II General operating and standard conditions: 1. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 2. The business shall prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business, or in the immediate area. 3. The Police Chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may, subject to the review of the Planning Commission, direct the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem. If the problem persists the Police Chief then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will automatically initiate a review of this Conditional Use Permit by the Commission. 4. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. 5. Any changes to the interior layout which alter the primary function of the business shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 6. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. SECTION III This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit and Parking Plan shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid an enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Govemment Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. 1. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions VOTE: AYES: Comms.Dettelbach,DiMonda,Merl,Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 96-11 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their rept ieeting of Fel nary 20, 1996. '•' Peter hairman Sol Blumenfeld, Secretary Tucker, 3- l9 -Sy Date KR/h:pers8 lO BACKGROUND MATEfZIAL e negative comment regarding the exterior appearance of a "California Stucco" in a town of quai di ` e - nt architectural structures. He asked that this be considered by the owners/developers, t. 'ch Comms. I_ Monda and Merl stated agreement. Comm. Di Monda said he agree • with the Commissio : s' statements, noting concern regarding parking and truck deliveries, whi e discussed with Director B . enfeld. Comm. Di Monda felt a compromise might be worke. • ut relating to the extended service h. s on the patios. Chmn. Tucker supported this mixed -.►.e project, expressed concern regarding par ' and suggested a parking attendant be on d -, especially at night, to promote a feeling of securi MOTION by Comm. Merl, Secon recommended Conditions with reaffi northern end, addition of a Condition requi by Comm. Dettelbach, t tion that the M an attend until closing, a six-foot glass partition to sep hours of operation shall end at 10:00 p.m. and th can be seated on the lower patio after 10:00 p PPROVE this application with the ttan egress/ingress openings be at the t during evening hours starting at 6:00 p.m. balcony shall be required, the upper balcony er balcony hours shall end at 11:00 p.m. No one AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, D. onda, Merl, Perrotti, . Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chmn. Tucker statedthese decisions could be appealed to the City Council within 0 days from this date. A bre was taken from 8:53 to 9:07 p.m. Chmn. Tucker reconvened the meeting all Co issioners present. 11. CUP 95-18/PARK 95-5 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT/TAVERN, WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, INTO THE ADJACENT EXISTING RESTAURANT SPACE, AND THE ADDITION OF A 600 SQUARE FOOT ROOF SEATING AREA, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 8 PIER AVENUE, HENNESSEY'S Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Director Blumenfeld said the applicant proposed to expand an existing bar and restaurant, not adding any additional square footage except 700 sq. ft. of seating on a roof deck. A parking plan amendment was required and the project would also be processed through the Coastal Commission. The Commission's expressed concerns were discussed with the applicant, who felt adequate separation by columns was planned. The issues of emergency egress/ingress have been addressed in the plans, the bar area relabeled correctly. The applicant has agreed to install a five-foot enclosure be provided to mitigate the ambient noise level on the outside roof deck, which is to have a 10:00 p.m. closure time P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 and no entertainment is allowed on this deck. He discussed the suggested conditions with the Commissioners. Chmn. Tucker opened the Public Hearing at 9:17 p.m. Paul Hennessey, 1855 S. Elaine Street, Redondo Beach, applicant, distributed and described pictures of the proposed project and historical growth of 'Hennessey's". He said this project would increase food service by having better kitchen facilities and equipment. He felt the design would take advantage of the view. Jerry Compton, project architect, 1200 Artesia Blvd., said the emergency doors and gate were addressed, the entertainment area would stay the same, a sense of transition from the old to new area was being planned, the seismic retrofit is underway, the planned sound system is adequate with no residents very close to the site. The ocean should mask any noise made by patrons. He said this project would have a net loss of one liquor license. The upgrade should result in a better clientele. Background music will be provided to the upstairs area on speakers with the capability for volume control. He discussed with Chmn. Tucker the elimination of a step next to the glass enclosure to stop people from being able to reach over the wall. Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, referenced the general comments he had previously made. He said notice was not posted at one of the addresses, he objected to expanding the business that is currently there, possible noise intrusion to close -by residents, impact to the community, and the continuance of a bar at this location and the possible increase in crime. Sheila Donahue -Miller, 77 17th Street, said she had problems with the Negative Declaration, noting there will be an increase in delivery trucks and parking. Director Blumenfeld confirmed that parking was not required on this project. She questioned the revitalization goals, stating they seemed to be "more booze". Rebuttal Paul Hennessey, applicant, said Mr. Lissner had presented negative information about the applicant's restaurant in Huntington Beach. Mr. Hennessey said he did not have a restaurant in Huntington Beach, suggesting the information presented by Mr. Lissner be "taken with a grain of salt". Jerry Compton, project architect, said the posting was placed on Hennessey's, knowing that Diana's was about to torn out. Posting was done on the inside. Two in -lieu parking will be provided. He said the area is what it is; if the area is revitalized, a better clientele will be attracted. No one else wished to speak, and Chmn. Tucker closed the Public Hearing at 9:42 p.m. Comm. Perrotti said he was more receptive to this proposal than the prior one sense this one addressed the Commission's stated concerns, to which Comms. Merl, Dettelbach and Di Monda agreed. Comm. Di Monda felt this was a fine example of the Planning Commission doing some planning, resulting in a better project. Chmn. Tucker commended the applicant for addressing the Commission's desires and P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 concerns. He suggested limitation of deliveries to certain times during the day to decrease impact, noting he felt this project would be a nice addition to the downtown area. MOTION by Comm. Dettelbach, Seconded by Comm. Merl, to APPROVE this application. AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Merl, Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chmn. Tucker stated this decision could be appealed to the City Council within 10 days from this date. 1\ CUP 96-1 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MINOR AMENDMENT TO ALL N -SALE BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EMS ' NG TAURANT AT 500 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, CITY MEX GRILL taff Re i mmended Action: To approve said Conditional Use Permit minor . ► ndment. Planning Director Sc ikbach said the applicant has taken over one half of a .reviously existing restaurant with full alcoh but wished to continue the restaurant with only a : - er and wine license. The same conditions are recended as those imposed on the recently ..proved restaurant which occupies the other half. Chmn. Tucker opened the Public Hear : at 9:53 p.m. J.L. Jackson, 16161 Nordhoff St., North Hi with any or all of the current Commissioners he sketched the front one third and would provide a ar applicant's re . esentative, said he had no reservations ng this e and making a decision. He said he had s drawing to staff. No one else wished to speak, and Chmn. Tucker c MOTION by Comm. Merl, Seconded by C AYES: Comm. Dettelbach, Di NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None sed the Public Hearing at 9:55 p.m. . Tucker, to AP ' ' OVE Staffs recommendation. onda, Merl Perrotti, Chmn. ker 13. PDP 95-8/CUP ' 5-17 -- PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND I NDITIONAL USE PE ' FOR A NEW 6200 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WI ON -SALE BEER • I WINE AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, AND ADOPTIO OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 844 HERMOSA A ' NUE, FORNIA BEACH RESTAURANT Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. 13 P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 February 13, 1996 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 20, 1996 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 96 - PARKING PLAN LOCATION: 4 & 8 PIER AVENUE APPLICANT: PAUL HENNESSEY 1845 S. ELENA STREET REDONDO BEACH, CA REQUEST: TO EXPAND AN EXISTING RESTAURANT/TAVERN (`HENNESSEY'S')WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT INTO THE ADJACENT EXISTING RESTAURANT SPACE TO THE WEST (CURRENTLY `DIANA'S') INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF A ROOF -TOP SEATING AREA. Recommendation To approve the request subject to the conditions as contained in the attached resolution. Background The subject request is a new application, with modifications, submitted following the Planning Commission previous action to deny Hennessey's requested expansion. PROJECT INFORMATION: ZONING: C-2, Restricted Commercial GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial LOT SIZE: 4711.5 sq. ft. GROSS EXISTING FLOOR AREA 4311.5 sq. Ft. (Including `Fish Market,"`i4ennessey's,"`Diana's" FLOOR AREA TO BE CONVERTED: 1806 sq. ft. ROOF -TOP SEATING AREA: 700 SQ. FT. PARKING: None ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Recommended Negative Declarationt Hennessey's currently operates under a C.U.P. (P.C. Resolution 90-78) which was most recently amended in 1990 to clarify the allowed entertainment hours. (S 1 1 The applicant is proposing to expand the existing Hennessey's Tavern (a bar and restaurant) into the adjacent restaurant space to the west (currently a restaurant - `Diana's'). While this is an expansion of the Hennessey's, the conversion of the interior space does not add any new interior square footage. The applicant also proposes to add a 700 square foot roof -top seating area which when added to the gross floor area of the existing buildings, causing the gross floor and seating area of the building to exceed the lot area by 300 square feet. Since the floor area/lot area ratio exceeds 1:1 additional parking is required pursuant to the City's and the Coastal Commission's parking requirements requiring a Parking Plan to accept fees in -lieu of required parking, or waiver of parking requirements. The project requires final approval by the Coastal Commission. The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of January 18, 1996 considered the environmental impacts of the project. The Committee recommended a Mitigated Environmental Negative Declaration. The Committee recommended that the potential noise from outside dining during evening and nighttime hours be mitigated by the provision of a sound barrier such as glass; and the prohibition of amplified music; and limitation of outdoor dining hours to 10:00 P.M. unless it can be shown that the nighttime standards in the noise ordinance would not be exceeded. Analysis The project includes an overall upgrade of the building and the facade, which will be done in conjunction with the required seismic retrofit. Overall, the project will result in the elimination of one on -sale ABC license and the upgrades will provide an attractive addition to lower Pier Avenue. The proposed conversion of the interior space includes substantial floor changes which increase the kitchen area; upgrade and increase the size of the bathrooms; and increase table seating area, while not increasing the size of the bar area. This will give the establishment the ability to operate as a restaurant and offer a wider variety of menu items. The proposed roof -top deck includes interior stair access through the main entry, and an emergency exit stair with panic hardware out to the Strand. The 700 square foot area would be open to the sky, but enclosed on three sides by a 5 -foot high `lass viewing guardrail'; and by a 5 - foot height building wall on the east side. Staff has met with the business owner and architect to review the previously noted concern of the Planning Commission. The suggestion to create a separation between the new expanded area, and the existing bar/entertainment area was discussed, however, the business owner does not want to construct a wall separating the existing and expanded areas since the design intent is to open up the space. The business owner indicates there is a planned demarcation of the existing and the proposed expansion area with a series of columns and an archway which creates a visual separation of the areas. All other concerns about emergency egress, the take-out window on the Strand, and the addition of a second `bar"have been resolved, and are shown on the plans. The Parking Plan is required, as noted above, for the 300 square feet that will exceed the 1:1 floor area/lot area ratio. This results in a requirement for 2 parking spaces. Staff recommends approval of a plan to accept an in -lieu fee or in -lieu fee transfer of $12,000. The applicant has the option of paying the fee, or requesting the Downtown Enhancement Commission to transfer funds from their set-aside funds to the parking improvement fund. The applicant has submitted a noise analysis (attached) of the outdoor dining to address the issue of the potential impacts of late night noise. Ambient noise levels were measured between 10:30 and 11:30 P.M. at nearby residential areas. The report assumes that no amplified music would be played on the roof deck, and that it would be surrounded by a 5' high enclosure. The conclusion is that `based on previous experience with similar outdoor dining areas and the ambient noise levels along Pier Avenue during evening hours, it is unlikely that noise produced by people on the outdoor patio will be audible at the residential areas analyzed." Based on this analysis, and given that the 5 -foot barriers will be installed and no amplified music will be played on the patio, it appears that use of the patio past 10:00 P.M. would not normally cause adverse impacts to any surrounding residents. As such, the mitigation measure for the barrier and prohibition of amplified music should be sufficient. Pursuant to the standard condition for noise, relative to both the live entertainment and the outside patio, any future complaints would require a noise analysis of the actual operation. The attached resolution of approval supersedes the conditions as contained in P.C. Resolution 90- 78 and contains the currently applicable standard conditions, and standard conditions regarding operating hours. The hours for live entertainment have remained the same, since no change has been requested. Michael Schubach Planning Director 1 Bl menfel Director So u , Community D elopment Department Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Noise Analysis 3. Neg.Dec. and Initial Study Checklist 4. P.C. Resolution 90-78 5. Application 4. Correspondence 16 axe_ en Robertson Associate Planner Davy Associates, Inc. Consultants in Acoustics 865 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Suite 202 • Manhattan Beach, CA 90266-4955 • Telephone: (310) 546-3387 • FAX• (310) 546-3009 PROJECT MEMORANDUM TO: PAULHENNESSEY FROM: BRUCE DAVY PROJECT: HENNESSEY'S GRILL - LIGHTHOUSE CAFE DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1996 JN: 96011 MEMO NO: P96011-1 SUBJECT: OUTDOOR DINING AREA NOISE IMPACT 1. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the area plan for the proposed Hennessey's Grill - Lighthouse Cafe on Pier Avenue at The Strand in Hermosa Beach. 2. Ambient noise measurements were made at nearby residential areas on February 8, 1996 between the hours of 10:30 and 11:30 p.m. These measurements were made with a B&K Model 2230 sound level meter calibrated with a B&K Model 4230 acoustical calibrator prior to and following the measurements. At each of the three locations, an average (LEQ) ambient noise level was measured over an approximate 15 -minute period. The noise sources at all three locations were surf noise, noise from people walking on The Strand, and distance traffic on Hermosa Avenue. The results of these ambient measurements are as follows: P96011-1 Hennessey's Grill Table 1 February 9, 1996 Page Two Measured Average (LEQ) Ambient Noise Levels in dB Location Time LEQ Ambient Sea Sprite 11:15 - 11:30 54.2 dBA Strand Condo 11:00 - 11:15 51.8 Grandview Hotel 10:45 - 11:00 52.7 3. It is our understanding that there will be outdoor dining at the patio on the second floor over the building adjacent to The Strand. This outdoor patio will seat 46 people. It is also our understanding that there will be no amplified music. 4. Distances were calculated from the outdoor patio to the three locations that were ambient measurements were taken. It was assumed that the 46 people would be talking in raised voice conversations between each other. A total of 23 pairs of people conversing at the same time was assumed. This source level was determined to be 89 dBA at a distance of 3'. It is our experience that conversational noise rarely gets this loud in a restaurant area without amplified music. This source level was used to calculate noise levels at the three locations. Distance effects were included as well as the shielding effects of a 5' high solid wall around the patio. The results of these calculations are summarized as follows: Table 2 • Calculated Noise Levels at Residential Locations in dB Location Noise Level Sea Sprite 50 dBA Strand Condo 41 Grandview Hotel 41 /8 P96011-1 Hennessey's Grill February 9, 1996 Page Three 5. Based on previous experience with similar outdoor dining areas and the ambient noise level along Pier Avenue during evening hours, it is unlikely that noise produced by the people in the outdoor patio area will be audible at the residential areas analyzed above. The calculations summarized in Table 2 indicate that noiselevels from the assumed conversational source level will be less than the existing ambient. Since the ambient is dominated by noise from the surf, it is unlikely to be any less than it was when measured. 6. The calculations were based on the assumption that there will be a 5' high solid wall around the perimeter of the exterior dining area. There may be times when there are shouts or yells from the patio that could be audible at the three residential areas analyzed. This is not considered to be a normal situation, however, and should be handled administratively by the restaurant. Normal conversations and noises generated by typical dining activities should not be audible at any of the three residential areas. Distribution: Paul Hennessey Gerry Compton Bruce A. Davy INCE. Bd Cert. Davy & Associates, Inc. City of Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety Testing Agency for Acoustical Testing Testing Agency License No. 24421 (Expires September 1, 1996) SITE MONITORING NOISE ANALYSIS JN 96011 PROJECT: HENNESSEY'S GRILL - LIGHTHOUSE CAFE LOCATION: SEA SPRITE TEST DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1996 START TIME: 11:15 P.M. END TIME: 11:30 P.M. EQUIPMENT USED: B&K 2230 SLM 1/2" RANDOM INCIDENCE MIC WINDSCREEN B&K 4230 CALIBRATOR TRIPOD WIND SPEED INDICATOR MICRONTA THERMOMETER/HYGROMETER TEMPERATURE: 68°f RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 64% WIND: 2 mph LEQ: 54.2 LMAX: 57.8 LMIN: 52.9 CNEL: 61.2 LDN: 60.2 20 DAVY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consultants in Acoustics SITE MONITORING NOISE ANALYSIS JN 96011 PROJECT: HENNESSEY'S GRILL - LIGHTHOUSE CAFE LOCATION: CONDO ON STRAND - NORTH TEST DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1996 START TIME: 11:00 P.M. END TIME: 11:15 P.M. EQUIPMENT USED: B&K 2230 SLM 1/2" RANDOM INCIDENCE MIC WINDSCREEN B&K 4230 CALIBRATOR TRIPOD WIND SPEED INDICATOR MICRONTA THERMOMETER/HYGROMETER TEMPERATURE: 69°f RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 65% WIND: 2 mph LEQ: 51.8 LMAX: 54.9 LMIN: 49.3 CNEL: 58.8 LDN: 57.8 2i DAVY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consultants in Acoustics SITE MONITORING NOISE ANALYSIS JN 96011 PROJECT: HENNESSEY'S GRILL LIGHTHOUSE CAFE LOCATION: GRANDVIEW HOTEL TEST DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1996 START TIME: END TIME: 10:45 P.M. 11:00 P.M. EQUIPMENT USED: B&K30 SLM 1/RANDOM INCIDENCE MIC WINDSCREEN B&K 4230 CALIBRATOR TRIPOD WIND SPEED INDICATOR MICRONTA THERMOMETER/HYGROMETER TEMPERATURE: 69°f RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 65% WIND: 2 mph LEQ: 52.7 LMAX: 63.6 LMIN: 49.4 CNEL: 59.7 LDN: 58.7 2Z DAVM & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consultants in Acoustics A A NAroO NAL 42-383 vavy Associates, Inc. Consulting Acoustical Engineers (213) 546-3387 ,OB NO. CY; f PROJECT 4E/0. f SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY DATE r'» a." Cocation a. Address: 8 Pier Avenue b. Legal: Northerly 45' of Lot 5, Block 12, Hermosa Beach Tract Description Conditional Use Permit amendment and Parking Plan for the expansion of an existing' restaurant with on -sale alcohol and live entertainment, and the addition of a 600 square foot roof seating area. Sponsor a. Name: Paul Hennessey b. Mailing Address: 1845 S. Elena, Suite 300, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Phone: ; (310) 540-2274 NEGATIVE DECLARATION In accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City of Hermosa Beach, which implements the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an .environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects .proposed to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental Quality Act. This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it becomes final,' no comprehensive Environmental Impact Report is required for this project. ACTIVITY IDENTIFICATION FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures'are included in the proiect, it would not have a significant effect on the. environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Community Development Department, Planning Division. Date of Finding airman, Environmental Review Committee FINDING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are included in the proiect, it would not have a significant effect on • the environment . Documentation supporting this finding. is on file in the Community Development . Department, Planning Division. 3 -i9 -9G Date of Finding Chairman, Planni g Commission FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL 0 We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance with Resolutior 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmenta Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are included in the project, it would not have a significan effect ;on the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Community Development Departmen Planning Division. Date'of Finding Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council 2q- Proposed Mitigation Measures 8 Pier Avenue 1. -Contributions to a parking improvement fund shall be made by the City, or, in -lieu fees shall paid by the applicant, shall be provided in an amount to compensate for the number of parking spaces the project is deficient pursuant to zoning code requirements. • 2. Double pane windows or windows with equivalent sound -proofing qualities shall be provided. Outside dining areas shall be enclosed by a glass barrier or an equivalent material, and hours shall be limited for the night-time use of the outside dining. The specific height and material of the barrier and the hours for outside dining shall be determined bya noise study prepared by the applicant, and approved by the City, based on achieving compliance with the City's noise ordinance. ZS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: PARKING PLAN 95-5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 95-18 The expansion of an existing restaurant with on -sale alcohol, into an adjacent restaurant space and the addition of a 600 square foot roof -top deck seating area.. 2. Project Location: 4 & 8 Hermosa Avenue 3. Project Sponsor: Paul Hennessey, "Hennessey's" 1845 S. Elena Ave. Suite 300 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 4. Lead Agency : City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 5. Contact Person: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner - (310) 318-0242 6. General Plan Designation: General Commercial 7. Zoning: C-2 8. Description of Project: Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow the expansion of an existing restaurant with on -sale general alcohol at 8 Pier Avenue (Hennessey's) into the adjacent restaurant space to the west at 4 Pier Avenue. Parking Plan (Diana's) that currently has on -sale beer and wine only, thereby increasing the interior floor area by 1800 square feet. The Parking Plan is to allow the 617 square foot roof -top deck addition to an existing building that will cause the building to exceeds a 1:1 floor area to lot area ratio, without providing the required additional parking. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: The subject site is located on the westerly end of the main street, where it terminates at the Strand walkway, within the commercial downtown district which is an urban setting. This district is already significantly built out with older buildings which typically cover almost their entire lots.. The site is surrounded on the east by commercial uses which consist of eating and drinking establishments, retail uses, business services , a movie theatre and some nonconforming residential uses. Public parking lots A and C are located nearby. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Coastal Commission ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use and Planning ® Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Geological Problems ❑ Energy and Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Water ❑ Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ® Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, that there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environmental, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Datils/4& e Sf4 ilf2Ak Printed Name For EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the mitigation measure has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from section XVII, `Early Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include reference to the page where the statement is substantiated. See the sample question below. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 7) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different ones. SAMPLE QUESTION: Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: Landslides or mudslides? (1, 6) Potentially Significant Potentially Unless ess 'Phan Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (Attached source list explains that 1 is the general plan, and 6 is a topographic map. This answer would probably not need further explanation.) 2_8 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less 'Chan Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low income or minority community)? ❑ U Consistent with the General Commerical General Plan Designation (1) and the zoning ordinance (2). compatible with surroundings (see project description). H. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructures? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n The new construction is interior to an existing building and on the roof thereof resulting in a potential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaurant use which is of a small scale, see project description. III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? b) Seismic ground shaking? 21 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Landslides or mudflows? ❑ ❑ ❑ f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil ❑ ❑ ❑ EX conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? ❑ ❑ ❑ h) Expansive soil? ❑ ❑ n I) Unique geologic or physical features? ❑ ❑ ❑ The new construction is interior to an existing building which will be done in conjunction with the required seismic safety retrofit of said building, resulting in a potential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaurant use which is of a small scale, see project description IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 3c ❑ ❑ ❑ Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated impact impact h) Impacts to groundwater quality? i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ❑ ❑ ❑ The new construction results in a potential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaurant u of a small scale, see project description V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any chance in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ The new construction is results in apotential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaurant use which is of a small scale, see project description VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? 3i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ II M ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1I Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ❑ ❑ ❑ The new construction and added seating area is interior to and on the roof of an existing building resulting in a potential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaurant use which is of a small scale (see project description) and thus will be less than significant with respect to traffic. However the project results in the requirement for additional parking since the added seating area will cause the building to exceed the 1:1 floor area to lot area ratio . This would be mitigated through the payment or funding of the in -lieu parking fee for the amount of parking required for the floor area that exceeds 1:1. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees) ? c) Locally designed natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ The new construction results in a potential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaurant u of a small scale, see project description VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful an inefficient manner? c) Results in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the and the residents of the state? • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ The new construction results in a potential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaurant of a small scale, see project description Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, ❑ grass, or tress? ❑ E The new resuls in a potential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaurant use which is of a small scale, see project description X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Customer use of the outside seating on the roof deck will potentially increase noise levels. The noise could be potentially significant during night-time hours when surrounding ambient levels decrease and noise carries further. The deck is proposed to be enclosed on four sides by parapet walls or a glass which will serve to buffer the noise. Another possible mitigation measure would be to limit hours of use of the roof seating to daylight and early evening hours. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 33 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): e) Other governmental services? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The new construction results in a potential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaurant use which is of a small scale, see project description, and will not impact government services. XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional water supplies? The new construction resulting in a potential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaura use which is of a small scale, see project description XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El fl The new exterior construction, which is limited to facade enhancements and treatment aroung the roof deck are minor and consistent with the downtown character. Lighting on the deck or on the exterior will be required to conform with the zoning code and not be directed off the property. XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? Lf ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑El Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact 1 nhaci c) Affect historical resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ❑ ❑ potential impact area? The new construction resuls in a potential intensification of use of the existing commercial restaurant use which is of a small scale, see project description XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El The new construction is interior to an existing building resulting in a potential intensification of use of the exis commercial restaurant use which is of a very small scale, see project description XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) 3s ❑ ❑ n ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less "Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. ❑ ❑ ❑ Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. 1. General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach (Land Use Element revised 1994) including the General Plan Map 2. City of Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance 3. Amendments to the City's Parking Requirements for Downtown: File includes the Coastal Lan Use Plan Amendment approved by the Coastal Commission; City Council Ordinance, Mitigated Negative Declaration ; and supportin analysis vic chiist 3.6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 90-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING BAR AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR 8 PIER AVENUE, HENNESSEY'S, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHERLY 45 FEET OF LOT 5, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on September 18 and October 2, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding a Conditional Use Permit amendment request and made the following findings: A. The Board of Zoning Adjustments approved Resolution BZA 154-391 on December 15, 1980 to allow amplified entertainment at a bar at 8 Pier Avenue; B. The sale of general alcoholic beverages is being conducted in an existing establishment already licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; C. The applicant is proposing amending the allowed hours for entertainment, to clarify the hours specified in BZA Resolution 154-391 and to expand those hours D. The proposed entertainment hours are compatible with surrounding uses; E. Strict compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact ,resulting from the issuance of the conditional use permit; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit Amendment, to authorize live entertainment in conjunction with an existing bar at 8 Pier Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours for live entertainment shall be limited to the hours from 9:00 P.M. to 1:15 A.M. Monday through Friday, and from 2:00 P.M. to 1:15 A.M. on Saturday, Sundays, and national holidays. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 3. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business or in the immediate area. 4. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's Noise Ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to the surrounding residential neighborhoods or commercial establishments. a. During the performance of amplified live entertainment, the exterior doors and windows shall remain closed b. Prior to this conditional use permit being effective an acoustical study shall be prepared by an acoustical expert, including a proposed sound dampening features to baffle and direct sound away from the entrance/exit and window areas to ensure compliance with the noise ordinance. Said study and sound dampening features shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and shall be implemented in the building. c. Management shall be responsible for the music/entertainment volume levels. d. A maximum of three entertainers shall be allowed to perform at any one time. 5. Screens shall be installed on all openable exterior windows at ground floor level to prevent pass through of alcoholic beverages and to control flies. -- 6. Signs shall be posted conspicuously and prominently at all exits and all check-out stands warning patrons who purchase any and all types of alcoholic beverages that "possession and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages in any public sidewalk, parking lot, beach, and/or any public place is prohibited by law and subject to citation and fine. The City of Hermosa Beach vigorously enforces its liquor laws" Said signs shall be at least 12" X 14", shall be printed in a large type, permanently maintained, and shall be posted in visible locations. 7. An employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. a. All employees shall be given a copy of the conditional use permit and shall acknowledge by signature that the conditional use permit has been read and understood. 8. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and • 3? 2 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 boisterous activities of patrons outside to business or in the immediate area. 9. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all time. 10. All signs shall comply with the City Sign Ordinance. 11. All alcoholic beverages shall be served in non -throw -away glass containers, including beer and wine. 12. Any violation of the conditions and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be grounds for an immediate revocation hearing and/or citation. 13. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may require the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel paid by the business. 14. Any changes to the exterior or interior design shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 15. Dancing shall be prohibited. 16. Maximum permissible occupancy must be clearly posted and may not be exceeded at any time. If the Department of Public Safety determine that the maximum occupancy is being violated, they may cite the business and initiate a conditional use permit revocation. 17. Food service shall be available between the hours of 11:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. daily. 18. Prior to the conditional use permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the planning department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 19. A conditional use permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted with the planning department. 20. The Planning Commission may review the conditional use permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 21. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if any of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. 22. This resolution incorporates and supersedes BZA Resolution 154-391 39 3 VOTE: AYES: Comms.Ketz,Rue,Chmn.Ingell NOES: Comms.Aleks,Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-78 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the ity of Hermosa Beach, California at their regulat meetin o er 2, 1990..__-- - f % /- `?f /-: Shot Ingel l , //2/1() Date 41-0 4 Michael Schubach, a/pers8 Secretary 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 376-4626 March 11, 1996 City Council City of Hermosa Beach Honorable Councilmembers: We wish to appeal the recent planning commission approvals of CUP's or PUP's for the following projects: 1. Hennesseys expansion into Diana's, at 2, 4, & 8 Pier Avenue 2. California Beach moving southward to 834-844 Hermosa Avenue 3. The building and Einsteins brewpub at 1301 Manhattan Avenue We each enclose our personal check in payment of the fee for appeal. Thank you, Shirley Cassell Wendy boeh Richard Everett Parker Herriott Adele Icaza James Lissner Sheila Miller Robin Paterson Robert Simpson Brice Torres Joseph vogl • PROJECT ADDRESS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 8 Pier Avenue Project Name (If applicable) Hennessey 's LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING C-2 APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name(s) Paul. Hennessey Phone 540-2274 Mailing Address 1845 S. Elena STE 300 Redondo Beach, Ca Applicant's Relationship to Property T.PacPP *I have inquired about the need to obtain a Coastal Development Permit from the Coastal Commission, an /�;P derstand I do do not require a permit APPLICANT'S SIGNATU . % / 4 //.6>011A/ Ain- DATE la —M- 7 PROJECT REQUEST Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) (3812) _ C.U.P. - Condominium of Units (3812) * X X C.U.P. - Amendment/Amortization (3805) C.U.P. - Minor Amendment (3899) C.U.P. - Fences & Walls (3864) Environmental Staff Review (3803) Final Map (3 810) General.Plan Amendment/Zone Change (3811) Height Limit Exception (3898) Lot Line Adjustment (3884) Nonconforming Remodel (3866) �-r//; p47// dr,Ahvb/fr/ ie X Parking Plan (3857) Permitted Use Request (3885) _ Planning Commission Appeals (3888) Precise Development Plan (3867) Tentative Map - Subdivision/Lot Split (3809) Tentative/Final Map/C.U.P. Extension (3883) _ Text Amendment, Private (3886) _ Variance (3808) Voluntary Lot Merger (3887) )C 300' Radius Noticing - 1st Noticing (3868) * X 300' Radius Noticing - 2nd Noticing (3890) Total Fees $723.25 'L,JD 50144 MA -L. 1-t?L i DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (attach additional pages if necessary) uw.Q WI fin. D4 -Salmi Go�`c Expansion of existing res taurant/tave nA to adjacent existing restaurant space. And Pc„,L:v,.S pi (AAA 6r Ike_ v, d t-(-T6,..v. o (— ec. CaOC: 'ill \RAF S-e-c..�►v�_S 4ev'e c1. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY- RECEIVED BY. r`'iA:9 DATE OF SUBMITTAL: l o 9 /S 5 ,2 4.0 sic ,It-, pa__ j, ZZs/iS OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT (Signature required from current PROPERTY OWNER, not own r n escrow.) Name ti./lJ1/,Mt n ? rt_ Signature Address ?7Z.. /' �•,vtg . 64- �'G�7� Telephone 37� =//5/ RECEIVED DEC 2 ? 1995 • CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT //./llll�l�1l./Ill./l./1lll�lflllJl./111.rtl.I./.Y1.�/J./111./..�Jl �lrl1 ✓lrlllJ.l./J� No.5907 A 14 State of CALIFORNIA County -of LOS ANGELES On 10/19/95 before me,WILLIAM A. HERRO, NOTARY PUBLIC NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC DATE personally appeared WILLIAM A. KRAUSE 11 personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL SIGNATURE OF NOTARY Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ® INDIVIDUAL O CORPORATE OFFICER ❑ PARTNER(S) TITLE(S) ❑ LIMITED O GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT O TRUSTEE(S) O GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR O OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT C.U.P. AMENDMENT/AMORTIZATION TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT -1 - NUMBER OF PAGES 10/19/95 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE int- - _ _ .. � ., r-. _.� - _�'�►� -� ._.-,...�.. ._. 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309-718 1F3 HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE February 13, 1996 Planning Commission Chairperson Pete Tucker and Members of the Planning Commission City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Development/Expansion Project — Pier Avenue and The Strand Dear Chairperson Tucker and Members of the Planning Commission: FEB 1.3 1996 PLANNING DEPT. At the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors meeting on Thursday, February 8, 1996, the members unanimously voted to support the proposed _new expansion and remodel of Hennessey's Tavern. The members of the Board are pleased to support Paul Hennessey in his expansion and upgrade endeavor. In addition to the exterior and interior improvements and upgrades, the incorporation of outdoor rooftop dining will be a wonderful asset to our downtown business district. By increasing the restaurant area with its additional dining space, more visitors and residents will have an opportunity to enjoy an outstanding meal just steps from the sand. Please consider our wholehearted support of this new development of California Beach during your decision-making process. We would like to rectuest that this letter of endorsement be included in the agenda packets for the February 20, 1996 Planning Commission meeting. Thank you in advance for yourconsideration of our position. Together we can work to make Hermosa Beach the best possible place in which to live, work and prosper. Sincerely, Keg Carol K. Duff Executive Director cc: Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director ti 1007 Hermosa Avenue • Hermosa Beach, California 90254 • (310) 376-0951 • FAX (310). 798-2594 Planning Commission do Community Development Dept. 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 January 25, 1996 To the Planning Commission: Ih:EC;ENLU JAN 291996 PLANNING DEPT. I recently heard that Hermosa Hennessey's may expand to the Strand boardwalk where Diana's Mexican Food currently exists. As a resident of the South Bay and a future mother, I am very concerned about this potential expansion. I believe that this easy access from the beach to this drinking establishment could be potentially dangerous to the young children who frequent the Strand. Thus, as a citizen, I implore you not to allow this proposed expansion. Encouraging youngsters to drink is certainly not something this city needs. Please include my letter in the packet when this item of business goes before the committee regarding Hennessey's and alcohol on the beach. Sincerely, A Concerned Resident 25 James Lissner 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 February 12, 1996 Hermosa Beach City Clerk RECEIVED FEB 1 2 1996 CITY MGR. OFFICE Re: Planning Commission hearing, February 20, CUP for 4 & 8 Pier Avenue, posting of notice Dear City Clerk: The Planning Commission is scheduled to hear, on February 20, a CUP application for 4 & 8 Pier Avenue. City code requires that a notice be posted at the premises but, while notice has been posted at 8 Pier Avenue, no notice has been posted at 4 Pier Avenue. I therefore ask that the hearing be postponed until notice has been properly given. Thank you, 1b ry„ FEB 1. 2 1996 - - CT; CLERK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACI I HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE February 13, 1996 Planning Commission Chairperson Pete Tucker and Members of the Planning Commission City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive;. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Development/Expansion Project' Pier Avenue and The Strand Dear Chairperson Tucker and Members of the Planning Commission: At the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors meeting on Thursday, February 8, 1996, the members unanimously voted to support the proposed new expansion and remodel of Hennessey's Tavern. The members of the Board are pleased ,to support Paul Hennessey in his expansion and. upgrade endeavor: In addition to the exterior and 'interior improvements and upgrades, the incorporation of outdoor rooftop dining will be a wonderfulasset to our downtown business district. By increasing the restaurant area with its additional dining space, more visitors and residents will have an opportunity to enjoy an outstanding meal just steps from the sand.. Please consider our wholehearted support of this new development of California Beach during your decision-making process We would like to request that this letter of endorsement be included in the agenda packets for the February 20, 1996 Planning Commission meeting. ' Thank you in advance for your consideration of our position. Together we can work to make Hermosa Beach the best possible place in which to live, work and prosper. Sincerely, Carol K. Duff Executive Director 'cc: Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director LEfl 1007 Hermosa Avenue • Hermosa Beach, California 90254 • (310) 376-0951 • FAX (310) 798-2594 d z H =ia fR ! PTR R P RXS y! R% R R P R FP a r P F P Pi p A r r f r r�. t i t� ra t t [Till! tt _¢ �_ ,� [ } !rj jt=t S•�!r ` �� v::: a t ! `� 1. . 1tt(�•t�'Ei � }}�� 11111 IIit;Y� rlJ!ttt 111.111.11 ip1i1`11Ii �RI"•1 V1111 1etrtit 11 1_ +� f _ 'Et �z11111 It.! �; t iii -�. lir11IR 1111,1,10 i��;3t t ��� = a !!!t t r! t4[;t WO.) t ttt t t6� tTt i,�t;ft;�'a�;ti �S;tj i�u �!t W O.t !t d t i r ;Q r • ! "t' �ti I �Q ' "j � t� 1 � t 1 3 Q I ;Jib 1 ! t I I rig = t �! r t1111, r�1t tt1' : if t �6 {♦ i 1;111. ;Jt t 1I t[1 =:'i= 1 t(1r, t r t?¢ ii`11 it . �t1 �t i r �� jttt�. 1 �' III i•111U 1��I�t }�i t ��!a r r t il1 t r ! ; r 11.1q" !'' 1 r f t r r j t i tF l jki $ t f tt. Hi`t11 r 1 1 pt 531ON -1` 7( DN30 g Ili • itt yr 1 Hi' rn rzrt r rn rn d M !III! R i " IJill P =,r ;1;21 P F : j+ PP ttrlP t�. r 1r rm t tl/1, 1 . ..11tTi0'1E0fjf911 h Pi° !fro' } tt :1 st ¢21t i 101/11 Pill tit �:! te. kh i.t 1p+ro1i� T i 1f1 �#� 1 � T• r1;A 2TO i 1 I 1 , trT TI4t j. ¢ Ili tt 1Hj}t 1 11 it-0%;PItt-ll Jis . 11 it 1�if 11 f III = if Tx .111i1 r it el 't 1.11 t[ *I: loft •;f ; flux 11 MT q I 1" Ill r .ti G LON J.0I31•3 11 11 i. 1 EIbaS lf oy .V. art Yin l ). 4%viNHfl9 ONIa1InGi 3 rn 3 a a z 2 D 71CO x C: 1 1 XI 1�3H5 SITE (ALAN / GENERAL ERAL NOTIE$ HENNESSEY'S EXPANSION 41'- - - - M fr4141&J 0 0 0 C -114/ 0 0 <\ 0 0 0 0 I Frre4erAilkiessii .r VIANL ._. *its' • . 4.10910' .f 0 • 1, o n WW.11 atit4c0.- 1711-11;,14 A 1 arevrk4 imnigeo PIm tsveNue. n r4LJLJ \/ ' LiLi p4.44 C.R1-144 11 FIRST LEVEL -FLOOR PLAN 4yovua Oe4Urf+10( 1441"40- 1/4 lot REVISION co a. z 0 1/3 X L1.1 Ca CO w.z w z•Aor-7.7-.4, ,-,!•5',1i,;',,,z.•(:-:2` 11111191111ES 4 0 GEMMA W. COMPTON AM =I MEM 1111101111 ME Pi MOB MR 0. V. SWIM awq 11=211=111 • 41 11' t 771__ woe M:4 C4.11.11.14 f LC^ wev 410 r4.14L.ohtsite- • ,joyell• L #1ble'T- Om" ••••••1. • • • ; 0410. 516.1, i .L. SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN REVISITI4 z 0 z a. w 0 LU • z zw x I t . - IIIIEBASEEN • GERALD Y. COMPTON AM C IMG =I C:21521in I I =II AMR MOM SOM. • MN ONO OWC oral II fl I _ 9 i cur gro4 •�5inwveu, asr.44 Ploielfn pm* .�[wi aave�c r WEST .ELEVATION n 1 4• = 111111 1111 11101111111111111 111 — 11111 11111111411111111 SOUTH ELEVATION 'h fIIllWIlullllH1111Ifli II1INIId1IIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilli IW itillm LR NORTH ,ELEVATION W1411001? •r• SMI 041014 4041.: - Orntr, 4 w wu4 POWNtha ISSAJNICE eEVIffi1 ELEVATIONS "464,1= 111111.18113 4~114 MereFCaungH • err MOULD W. COMPTOYN AIA UM mer WIZ fa MUM MOIL aNIS 0A a►a OWC • • r--egsvnuy r Cxl9f4 lS+ a- _� GxM114 PIuw4 Atre,• Nei A/Pei SECTION A ISSUNCE REVIZEIN z 0 z a X w CO CO z • _� iltaWKA SHISMIESSI • QEtALD W. co T08 *1* S Men MM. R P as Oft a4 PI se OWC • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Sol Blumenfeld,'[I3lrector, Community Development Department Subject: Exhibits for Agenda Items #4, 5 & 6 Date: April 4, 1996 The following are the exhibits for agenda items # 4, 5 & 6: 1. City of Hermosa Beach on -sale Conditional Use Permit approval status 2. Appellant letters 3. City of Hermosa Beach crime statistics 4. "Policy Brief: Alcohol Availability, Drunken Driving, and Alcohol -Related Casualties" by Prevention Research Center y/f:memo3 4 , 5 t s EXHIBIT 1 STATUS OF DOWNTOWN ON -SALE ALCOHOL PERMITS: 9/94 TO PRESENT No. Date App- roved Name Previous Use Expanded Use Net Sq. Ft. Usage Change 1 10/18/94 Brewski's retail restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine ' 2460.0 2 10/18/94 Ragin Cajun Cafe restaurant expansion of existing restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine 887.5 3 11/15/94 Sharks Cove retail billiard hall w/ on -sale general alcohol 3200.0 4 02/21/95 Sabroso's retail restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine 1346.0 5 10/18/94 Sangria restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine on -sale general alcohol 0.0 6 04/18/95 Cafe Boogaloo retail restaurant w/ on -sale general alcohol 3000.0 7 04/18/95 Fat Face Fenner's Falloon restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine on -sale general alcohol 0.0 8 07/18/95 La Pasta restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine on -sale general alcohol 0.0 9 1/162/96 Strawberry Patch Cafe restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine on -sale general alcohol 0.0 10 1/16/96 Club Sushi restaurant w/ on -sale general alcohol additional mezzanine area 360.0 11 2/20/96 *California Beach medical restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine 4400.0 12 2/20/96 *Hennessey's restaurant w/ on -sale general alcohol expansion to adjacent existing restaurant space and additional roof seating area 617.5 13 2/20/96 *Ein Steins vacant lot mixed use building w/ restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine 8440.0 14 03/19/96 Patrick Malloy's restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine new restaurant w/ on -sale general alcohol 0.0 15 03/13/96 Sushi Sei (approval pending) retail restaurant w/ on -sale beer/wine 1650.0 Total 26361 *subject of 4/9/96 Appeals Net New Floor Area for Alcohol Use: 26,361 sq. Ft. As Percentage of Total Commercial Floor Area Downtown: (Approx. 362,000 sq. ft.) _7% .LArlibl i G Hermosans residing within 2 blocks of downtown (A olt )'� �From: Hermosans resisting the tavernization of downtown, 376-4626 W"� `S�erUn:Feb. 20 the Hermosa Planning Commission OK'd three new or expanded [� restaurant/bars downtown - 1. California Beach Sushi's move south, to 834 Hermosa Ave., where they will build a very large (6000 ft.) restaurant in place of the present doctor's office; 2. Hennessey's expansion into Diana's, and the addition of a roof deck; 3. A brewpub called Ein Stein, to be built in the vacant lot north of Java Man. . If it's already tough enough for you to find a parking space, and it'S already noisy enough late at night', you can - 1. Lend your financial support, or your voice, or both, to our effort to appeal the Planning Commission's decisions to the City Council. The absolute deadline to file and pay for the appeal is this coming Monday, March 11. It will cost a total of $1042.50 to appeal all 3 projects, and we are asking for contributions of $10 to $25 or more (checks should be made to "City of Hermosa Beach"). If you can help, please call 376-4626, leave your phone number on the answering machine, and someone will call you back over the weekend to arrange to pick-up your check - or tell you where you can drop it off. Once we have filed the appeals, the council will hold a hearing in about a month - which you can • attend. We will send each contributor a notice giving the date. 2. Also, call or write the council. Their address is 1315 Valley Drive, and their phone numbers are: ti City Hall John Bowler Robert Benz 318-0216 376-1863 379-6155 Sam Edgerton 374-0193 JR Reviczky 379-6267 Julie Oakes 374-3820 3. Next, if, despite our appeal, the council upholds the planning commission decision and gives California Beach permisssion to move and expand, wait for the white ABC notice of application for liquor license to go up at the new sites (Hennessey's is already up, the others will go up sometime in the next six months), then call the ABC at 412-6311 and have them send you a Protest Form to fill out. Finally, here is a list of the permits the city has granted downtown since just January 1. Strawberry Patch - hard liquor, later hours, belly dancing N Club Sushi - added mezannine level inside building ..,Hennesseys - took -over Diana's and added root deck, hard liquor -.,California Beach - moving south and expanding :bEin Stein Brewpub - to go in vacant lot north of Java Man •oBeach Market - beer and wine March 8, 1996 • Z .1 Arll1)l 1 G Table No. 31-A: Spaces Required. Total Number of Parking Spaces in Lot or Garage Minimum Required Number of Spaces 1-25 1 26-50 2 51-75 3 76-100 4 101-150 5 151-200 6 201-300 7 301-400 8 401-500 9 501-1000 2 % of total 1001 and over 20 plus 1 for each 100 or fraction thereof over 1001 3107A(a)2. Less than Five Spaces. When less than 5 parking spaces are provided at buildings and facilities subject to these regulations, one shall be 14 feet wide and lined to provide a 9 foot parking area and a 5 foot loading and unloading area. However, there is no requirement that the space be reserved exclusively or identified for use by persons with disabilities only. 3107A(a)3. Medical Care Outpatient Facilities. At facilities providing medical care and other services for persons with mobility impairments, parking spaces complying with this section shall be provided in accordance with Table 31A except as follows: A. Outpatient units and facilities: 10 percent of the total number of parking spaces provided serving each such outpatient unit br facility; B. Units and facilities that specialize in treatment or services for persons with mobility impairments: 20 percent of the total number of parking spaces provided serving each such unit or facility. Interpretation [for Section 3107A(a)3] • Subsection 3 is a new requirement taken from the ADA. The • intent is to provide a greater percentage of accessible spaces in • • health care occupancies that serve people with mobility impair- • ments, since there would be a correspondingly greater demand The CaIACS Accessibility Standards Interpretive Manual ©1993 CaIACS Page 144 3 Vitoi b'. 0� ..�w .:.t.4 l -. „ u • 4y7ffJi.,.3: BOUNDAY EXHIBIT 2 PL IONGFELIOW AVE lYv YW ¢0 OTH :ITA '0\\.SZ ASF r \ \ Ex,I1101lk "7/2-6-71 arc l477-&72k-Tf-/- /J`(�o ARTESIA - -B.LVD 91 25TH, 24TH �j 24TH r p 103 o n 9 sl �n •10 OCL . O 0001s 123, �D_ 1 ' 63j,', '•o O o O'53F '1° y • �r ` \ o� 27 Y ,o r, L' 15WH % \ 9 $t ' y G Av yon res n13tH z ` .e v (:'T�J1cRs 9 C �"' c' HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL PIER 65 98 l.T 70cl -1H•.• f, �� 8% 1 ,-v, ' �%t4 St 7.r p9 `'".d St! 26:5- 0 Suspect showed friends his knife POLICE: Court docu- ment reveals details of alleged hate crime. By ANNE C. MULKERN4,1-96 The Orange County Register HUNTINGTON BEACH — Erik Roy Anderson held the shiny silver knife, showing it off to his friends. The weapon had a nickname, Anderson told his pals. He called it his "Klingon death dagger." "I haven't killed anyone in a long time," Anderson, according to court records, said late last Friday. He and three friends then gulped their beer and went to the Huntington Beach Pier. Within hours, police say, An- derson pulled the knife out again, this time with a more heinous intent. With repeated, frenzied motions, police say, he stabbed another man sitting with friends at a lifeguard tower because the man's skin was brown. The at- tack early Saturday nearly killed a 20 -year-old American Indian man from Crestline. New details of the stabbing emerged for the first time Thurs- day in a court affidavit written to secure a search warrant for An- derson's home. Anderson, 20, a reputed Ku Klux Klan member, remained in custody at Orange County Jail. He told his father he had been assaulted in the jail Wednesday, but tilt sheriff's office Thursday said the assault never occurred, and that Anderson now denies telling his lather he was jumped. Anderson called his father again Thursday and recanted his earli- er story, saying he was threat- ened, but not hurt. 'l'he attack at the beach, the warrant shows, came after An- derson and some companions spent a night drinking beer and harassing people. "White power," they shouted at one dark-skinned woman, who responded "God power." "White power," they said again. The 17 -year-old La. Palma boy in the group reportedly shoved the woman and threatened to EXHIBIT 2 throw her off the pier. Police pieced together the night's events after talking to a 16 -year-old Huntington Beach girl who had been with the sus- pects before and during the at- tack. The Orange County Regis- ter is withholding the girl's iden- tity for her protection. Anderson, the La Palma boy, a 20 -year-old Huntington Beach man who hasn't been arrested and the 16 -year-old girl gathered Friday night, after Anderson fin- ished his shift clerking at a West- minster Mall pet store. They bought beer, though all are youn- ger than 21, then drank behind apartments at Walnut Avenue and 10th Street. Anderson, clad in a black T-shirt with the word "Killer" emblazoned across the front, showed the knife to his friends. The group then moved their party to the beach. After taunt- ing several people, they headed for a lifeguard tower, where the 20 -year-old Crestline man sat with a 16 -year-old Fountain Val- ley girl and her 16 -year-old boy- friend from Deer Lodge Park. The three friends noticed an object in Anderson's waistband. "Look, he has a gun, just be calm," the Fountain Valley girl told her boyfriend. ."Are you down with white pow- - er?" someone in the group of newcomers asked. When the Crestline man began to run to avoid attack, the La Palma boy grabbed him around the neck. Anderson, the document said, be- gan stabbing. The attack apparently took An- derson's other friends by sur- prise. The 20 -year-old Hunting- ton Beach man shouted. "What are you doing?" Suddenly, the La Palma bo jumped back and cried out. "Dude, you just stabbed me." Anderson, police said. had stuck his friend in the eye The Fountain Valley girl ran in terror toward a Taco Bell on Pa- cific Coast Highway. Moments later the La Palma boy confront- ed her, the document said. his face wet with blood. "Do you know who I am?" he shouted. The Deer Lodge Park boy told police he, too, ran, then turned back to help his friend. He saw the attackers run off together. Police arrested the La Palma boy at a hospital where he was treated for his eye wound. They learned another man, Shannon Martin, 23, of Huntington Beach, allegedly had hidden the knife. He remains in custody. Police questioned the 16 -year-old Hun- tington Beach girl, who identi- fied Anderson. Police arrested him Sunday. 'l'he 17 -year-old La Palma youth is being held in Orange County Juvenile Hall until a Feb. 28 hearing to determine whether he will be tried as an adult. PANEL TO HOLD RALLY The county Human Relations Commission voted Thursday night to hold a demonstration of support for the victim of the Hun- tington Beach stabbing. The ral- ly is scheduled for noon today in front of UCI Medical Center in Orange. EXHIBIT 2 AAAA tAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*******AAAAAAAAAAAAAA A**********AAAAAAA****AAAAAA A* AAAAAAAAAA*****AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA********* AAAAAAAA*AAA*A***AAAA***AAAA**A*AAA*AAAAAAA*AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*AAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAA*AAA*AAA*AA**AAA**A*AAAAAAA******AAA**AAAA EEEEE L L EEEEE BUDD GGG EEEEE E L L E 0 06 6E E __ L L E D D G E EEEE L L EEEE D D G EEEE E L L E D D G GGG E E L L E 0 06 6E EEEEE LLLLL LLLLL EEEEE DDDD GGG EEEEE H H RBBB EEEEE HHBBE HHBBE HHHHH BBBB EEEE HHBBE HHBBE H H BBBB EEEEE AAAAAAAAAAAA*AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*AAAA*AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA L III SSS TTTTT CCC RRRR I1I M M EEEEE RRRR EEEEE CCC 000 RRRR DDDD SSS L I S S T C C R R I MM MM E R RE CCOORRDDSS L I S T C R R I MMM E RRE C OORRDDS L 1 S T C RRRR I M M EEEE RRRR EEEE C 0 0 RRRR D D S L 1 S T C RR I M M E RR E C 0 0 RR D D S L i S S T CCRR IMME RRE CCOORRDDSS LLLLL II1 SSS T CCC R R I1I M M EEEEE R R EEEEE CCC 000 R R DUDD SSS ( BBBB' M M ) ( R B MMS MM ) ( B B MMM. ) ( BBBB M M ) ( B B M Mm ) ( H B M M, ) ( BBBB M M ) AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA OPTION: LISCRI PROGRAM: RECLISCRI SPEC: RECLISCRI REOUESTEU BY: ELLEDGE ON: IXC6 AT: 07 -Feb -96 / 01:24 PM PARAMETERS: 1-Y ' 3- 4 - 040000 5 - 040502 6- 7- B- 9- 10 - 11 - 010195 12 - 123195 TIME REPORT STARTED RUNNING IS 07 -Feb -96 / 01:31 PM DO NOT DETACH FROM REPORT it.u7t,/--aLet:4(epetdi-,T44A,A,d-s12/9 3 -7 tit; gorED l (04-.3 ; 3543 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWAAAA*AAA*AAAAAAAAAA***A*A*AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA#AAAAAAAAAWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAA*AAA*AAAAAAAA****A*AAAAAAAA*AAA*AA#AAAAAAAA*AAAAAAAA**AAAAAAA*A*AAA*AAAAAWAWAAAA AAAAAAAAAAWWAWAWAAAA*AAAAAAA RECLISCRI (BM) CRIME RECORDS BY NATIONAL CODE FROM 040000 10 040502 (DATE FROM 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95) REPORTING NATCOD DESCRIPTION CASE N0. RD OFICER NAME CLERK TY SECTION AS OF 07 -Feb -96 01:29 PM PAGE 1 OCCURRENCE CLOSE m� P DESCRIPTION DATE TIME DOW OFICER STAT icy 040101 ASLT GUN CITZ 95-001132 1 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBC079 PC 664/187 ASLT-A 03/28/95 0200 TUE HB0114 C V, LOCAIION: 0 PIERAAV., HB DESCRIPTION: 040101 ASLT GUN CITZ 95-002700 1 HB0106 ENDOM STEVE HBP073 PC 245(A)(2) ADW W/GUN 07/16/95 1830 SUN HB0109 C '. N'' LOCATION: 802 THE STRAND, HB DESCRIPTION: CITE CT DATE 08-14-95 H213822 040101 ASLT GUN CITZ 95-004821 3 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBP073 PC 245(A)(2) LOCATION: 745 8TH PL., HB 040201 ASLT NIF CITZ 95-003463 1 HB0123 SALDANA RAUL HBC081 PC 245(A) LO(:A11ON: 629 LOMA DR., HB 040201 ASLT NIF CITZ 95-003789 1 HB0102 TUREK TEM LOCATION: 2 HERMOSA AV., HB 040201 ASLT NIf CITZ 95-004218 3 HB0109 ECKERT THOMAS LOCATION: 709 PIER AV., HB 04020) ASLT NIF CITZ 95-004732 1 HB0114 RICKEY DAVID LOCATION: , 443 .2ND ST., HB 040201 ASLT NIF CITZ 95-005058 1 HB0100 MITCHELL KIM $$" LOCATION: 0 THE PIER, HB 040202 ASLT NIF PO •95-000363 3 HB0102 TUREK TIM LOCATION: ' 1617 PCN, HB ADW W/GUN 11/22/95 1145 WED HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: ASLT-A 09/02/95 1516 SAT HB0123 C DESCRIPTION: SUSP ARRESTED 091295 HBP075 PC 417(A) DISP FIREARM 09/25/95 0220 MON DESCRIPTION: HBP073 PC 245(A) ASLT-A 10/22/95 1515 SUN HB0121 C DESCRIPTION: HBP073 PC 273.5 CORP INJURY 12/03/95 2100 SUN HB0126 DESCRIPTION: HBP073 PC 245(A) ASLT-A 12/30/95 1949 SAT HB0109 DESCRIPTION: RC002 PC 594 VANDAL 01/29/95 0101 SUN DESCRIPTION: 040301 ASLT OTH CITZ 95-000939 3 HB0141 CHARLES BILL HBC079 PC 245(A)(1) LOCATION: 1707 PCH, HB 040301 ASLT OTH CITL 95-001104 3 HB0142 AVERILL, KEVI RC002 PC 245(A) LOCATION: 745 8TH PL., HB . %040301 ASLT OTH CITZ 95-001185 1 HB0102 TUREK TIM HBC079 PC 245(A)(1) LOCATION: 22 P1ER AV., HB 040301 ASLT OTH CITZ 95-001745 1 HB0078 THOMPSON TOM HBC079 PC 245(A)(1) LOCATION: 52 THE STRAND, HB 040301 ASLT OTH-CITZ 95-001950 1 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBC079 PC 245(A)(1) LOCATION: 2^6 PIER AV., HB ,040301 ASLT OTH CITZ 95-002848 1 HB0119 JAAKOLA LANCE HBP073 PC 245(A)(1) LOCATION: 59 11TH ST., HB 3 5 CO C � ADW WEAPON 03/12/95 0650 SUN HB0131 C DESCRIPTION: 9 1© ASLT-A 03/25/95 1140 SAT DESCRIPTION: ADW WEAPON 04/01/95 0100 SAT HB0114 C 1 2 - DESCRIPTION: ADW WEAPON 05/14/95 2010 SUN HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: ADW WEAPON 05/30/95 0303 TUE HB0123 C DESCRIPTION: ADW WEAPON 07/24/95 2330 MON H80114 C DESCRIPTION: 040301 ASLT OTH'CITZ 95-003164 3 HB0065 KOEBSELL JOHN HBp079 PC 245(A)(1) ADW WEAPON 08/11/95 1330 FRI LOCATION: 403 PACIFIC COAST HY., HB DESCRIPTION: 040301 ASLT OTH CITZ 95-004420 3 HB0135 SHEID DOROTHY RC002 PC 245(A) ASLT-A 11/06/95 2100 MON LOCATION:- 825 13TH ST., HB DESCRIPTION: 040302 ASLT OTH"PO 95-003992 2 HB0126 COOK NANCY HBP080 PC 664/187 — LOCATION:. 0 13TH ST., HB 7 ASLT-A 10/08/95 1830 SUN DESCRIPTION: 13 l 15 1(9 17 RECLISCRI (8M) CRIME RECORDS BY NATIONAL CODE FROM 040000 TO 040502 (DATE FROM 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95) REPORTING NATCCOD DESCRIPTION CASE NO. RD OFIC'ER NAME AS OF 07 -Feb -96 01:29 PM PAGE 2 OCCURRENCE CLOSE CLERK TY SECTION , DESCRIPTION DATE TIME DOW OFICER STAT 040401 ASLT S/A CITZ {J5-000101 2 HB0102 TUREK TIM LOCATION: 2106 THE STRAND, HB RC002 01/07/95 2021 SAT DESCRIPTION: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 040401 ASLT S/A CITZ 95-000250 1 HB0140 HEARD LANCE RC001 LOCATION: 712 MANHATTAN AV., HB 040401 ASLT S/A CITZ 95-000309 2 HB0135 SHEID DOROTHY HBP073 PC 243.1 LOCATION: HERMOSA AV. /27TH ST. , HB 040401 ASLT S/A CITZ 95-000310 1 HB0126 COOK NANCY HBP073 PC 243.1 LOCATION: 540 PIER AV., HB 040401 ASLT S/A CITZ 95-000517 2 HB0140 HEARD LANCE LOCATION: 1521 MONTEREY BL., HB • L 040401 4511 S/A CITZ 95-000666 1 HB0102 TUREK TIM LOCATION: HERMOSA AV. /PIER AV. , HB 040401 ASLT*S/A'CITZ 95-000910 2 HB0106 ENDOM STEVE LOCATION: 3000 THE STRAND, HB 01/19/95 2119 THU DESCRIPTION: BATTERY GUARD 01/24/95 0200 TUE HB0114 C DESCRIPTION: BATTERY GUARD 01/24/95 0200 TUE HB0114 C DESCRIPTION: RC001 02/10/95 0116 FRI DESCRIPTION: HBC078 PC 273.5 CORP INJURY 02/19/95 2320 SUN HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: HBC081 PC 243.4 SEX -0 03/09/95 1300 DESCRIPTION: Iq 9.0 as a3 THU HB0109 C a 5 040401 ASLI S/A CITZ 95-001025 1 HB0106 ENDOM STEVE HBC079 PC 242 BATTERY 03/19/95 0520 SUN HB0109 C LOCATION: HERMOSA AV. /HERONDO ST. , HB DESCRIPTION: '.040401 ASLT S/A Mi. 95-001119 H80142 AVERILL, KEVI HBC079 PC 273.5 CORP INJURY 03/26/95 1820 SUN H80114 C LOCATION: SO BAY HOSPITAL, HB DESCRIPTION: 040401 ASLT S/A CITZ 95-001393 3 HB0141 CHARLES BILL HBC081 PC 273.5 CORP INJURY 04/16/95 2300 SUN HB0114 C LOCATION:1532 PROSPECT AV., HB DESCRIPTION: 040401 ASLT S/A CITZ 95-001555 3 HB0141 CHARLES BILL HBC081 DOMESTIC VIOL 04/30/95 2300 SUN LOCATION: , 1821 PACIFIC COAST HY., HB DESCRIPTION: L 040401 ASLI S/A CITZ 95-003138 2 HB0078 THOMPSON TOM RC001 LOCATION: MANHATTAN AV. /28TH CT. 040401 ASLT S/A-CITZ 95-003673 1 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION: 831 MANHATTAN AV., HB 040401 ASL S/A CITZ 95-004398 1 HB0145 VAUGHAN CHRIS RC001 PC 242 LOCAT1ON: 11T HB 040402 ASLT S/A-PO 95-004208 2 HB0145 VAUGHAN CHRIS HBP073 PC 243(C) LOCATION: 1(44 HERMOSA AV., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL,CIT 95-000105 H80126 COOK NANCY LOCATION: .. .4911ER_AV4, HB 040501 ASLT SMPL-CIT 95-000134 3 HBs144 STRATIS, NICH LOCATION: -1439 PCH, HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-000154 1 H 0119 JAAKOLA LANCE LOCATION: 724 HERMOSA AV., HB • INJURED PARTY 08/09/95 2018 WED DESCRIPTION: ap a7 as alq 30 BATTERY 08/12/95 1200 SAT HB0121 C 1,1 DESCRIPTION: REFER 95-3185 FOR ORIGINAL i BATTERY 11/04/95 2230 SAT DESCRIPTION: BATT OFFC INJ 10/22/95 0615 SUN HB0123 C 3 3 DESCRIPTION: HBC079 PC 242 BATTERY 01/08/95 0056 SUN H80114 C DESCRIPTION: HBP079 PC 243(A) ASLT-S 01/10/95 0116 TUE DESCRIPTION: HBC079 PC 242 BATTERY 01/12/95 0030 THU HB0109 C 3b DESCRIPTION: 3a 3s s-ee- is•-cm04- on El - RECLISCRI (BM) CRIME RECORDS BY NATIONAL CODE FROM 040000 TO 040502 (DATE FROM 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95) REPORTING NATCOD DESCRIPTION CASE NO. RD OFICER NAME CLERK TY SECTION AS OF 07 -Feb -96 01:29 PM PAGE 3 OCCURRENCE CLOSE DESCRIPTION DATE TIME DOW OFICER STAT 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-000175 2 HB0095 HARTT STEVE HBC079 PC 242 LOCATION: 2106 THE STRAND, HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-000318 2 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBC078 PC 273.5 LOCATION: 135 28TH CT., HB �' 040501 ASLT'SMPL CIT 95-000331 2 HB0121 VINCENT WILLI HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION: : 0 HAWTHORNE /TORRANCE BL., TORRANCE 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-000333 3 HB0095 HARM STEVE LOCATION: 715 PIER AV., HB 040501 ASLT-SMPL CIT 95-000490 3 R81081 SHUMAKER HBC079 PC 242 LOCATION: 1107 7TH SI., HB RC001 PC 242 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-000497 1 HB0065 KOEBSELL JOHN HBC079 LOCATION: 1087 MONTEREY BL., HB 040501 ASLT. SMPL CIT 95-000620 3 HB0095 HARTT STEVE HBC079 PC 242 LOCATION: B28 PACIFIC COAST HY., HB W 040501 ASLT.SMPL CIT 95-000732 2 HB0142 AVERILL, KEVI RC001 PC 242 1 LOCATION: 1334 HERMOSA AV., HB 040501 ASLT.SMPL ;CIT 95-000832 2 HB0106 ENDOM STEVE LOCATION: - . HE SA AV. /141H ST. , HB 040501 ASLT SMPL'CIT LOCATION.: 603 040501 ASLT SMPL SIT LOCATION: 540 040501 ASLT. SMPL. CIT LOCATION: RC001 PC 242 95-000840 3 HB0142 AVERILL, KEVI HBC081 PC 245(A) 30TH ST., HB 95-000981 1 HB0038 CRAY TOM PIER AV., HB 95-001019 1 HB0102 TUREK TIM 36 HB 040001 ASLT SMPL.CIT LOCATION: 454 \•1\r040501 '\040501 ASLT SMPL CIT LOCATION: 95-001034 PCH, HB 95-001097 30 P]E AV. B 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT LOCATION: _315 040501 ASLT -SMPL. CIT LOCATION: 851 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT LOCATION: 1130 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT LOCATION: 540 95-001113 HBC079 PC 242 HBC079 PC 242 3 HB0102 TUREK TIM RC002 1 HB0100 MITCHELL KIM HBP073 PC 242 1 HB0145 VAUGHAN CHRIS HBPO/3 PC 242 MANHATTAN AV., HB 95-001144 1 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBP073 PC 273.5 CYPRESS AV., HB 95-001510 1 HB0106 ENDOM STEVE HBP056 BAYV1EW UR., HB 95-001691 1 HB0122 BOHACIK DAVID RC001 PC 242 PIER AV., HB BATTERY 01/13/95 1700 FRI HB0123 C DESCRIPTION: CORP INJURY 01/24/95 0237 TUE C 36 DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 01/25/95 1530 WED HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: COURTESY REPORT BATTERY 01/26/95 1440 THU DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 01/23/95 2005 MON HB0109 DESCRIPTION: 01/30/95 MON HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: POSSIBLE ELDER ABUSE BATTERY 02/16/95 0930 THU HB0109 DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 02/25/95 0200 SAT DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 03/04/95 SAT DESCRIPTION: ASLT-A 03/04/95 1452 SAT DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 03/15/95 2000 WED HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: COURTESY RPT SAN BERNADINO PD BATTERY 03/19/95 0210 SUN HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: CT DATE 042495 02/04/95 1200 SAT DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 03/24/95 2355 ERI HB0131 C DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 03/26/95 1315 SUN HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: CORP INJURY 03/28/95 2104 TUE HB0126 C S -) DESCRIPTION: 04/27/95 2230 THU 53 BATTERY 05/10/95 1430 WED c(f DESCRIPTION: +3 Sc DESCRIPTION: RECLISCRI (BM) CRIME RECORDS BY NATIONAL CODE FROM 040000 TO 040502 (DATE FROM 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95) REPORTING NATCOD DESCRIPTION CASE NO. RD OfICER NAME AS OF 07 -Feb -96 01:29 PM PAGE 4 OCCURRENCE CLOSE CLERK TY SECTION DESCRIPTION DATE TIME DOW OFICER STAT 040501 ASLI SMPL CIT 95-001821 1 HB0141 CHARLES BILL HBC081 PC 242 LOCATION: 851 CYPRESS AV., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-001938 1 HB0143 RAMIREZ, JAIN HBP080 LOCATION; 1137 MONTEREY BL., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-001941 3 HB0142 AVERILL, KEVI HBC079 PC 242 LOCATION: 201 PROSPECT AV., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-002024 1 HB0142 AVERILL, KEVI HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION:. 52 PIER AV., HB ,040501 ASLT .SMPL CII 95-002055 1 HB0079 PHILLIPS BRUC RC001 PC 242 LOCATION: 26 P1 R AV., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-002081 2 H80144 STRAIIS, NICH RC002 PC 242 LOCATION:" 3436 THE STRAND, HB M40501 ASLT_SMPL CIT 95-002102 2 HB0100 MITCHELL KIM HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION: JD:T-4_ 040501 ASLT SMPL LOCATION: 040501 ASLT SMPL L0CAT10N: 040501 ASLT SMPL LOCATION: 040501 ASLT. SMPL LOCATION: 040501 ASLT SRL LOCATION .CIT 95-002244 1 HB0102 TUREK TIM HBC081 560 8TH ST., HB C1T 95-002314 2 HB0143 RAMIREZ, JAIM HBP073 531 PIER AV., HB CIT 95-002402 1 HB0079 PHILLIPS BRUC HBP073 PC 242 MANHATTAN AV. /PIER AV. , HB CIT 95-002417 1 H80102 TUREK TIM HBP056 PC 646.9 48 PIER AV., HB CIT 95-002448 1 HB0144 SIRATIS, NICH HBP079 PC 245(A) 66 THE STRAND, HB 040501 ASLT SMPL Q.IT 95-002470 2 HB0142 AVERILL, KEVI HBP080 PC 242 LOCATION;. .1600 THE STRAND, HB :'040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-002474 2 HB0126 COOK NANCY HBP056 PC 273.5 LOCATION:. 77 15TH SI., HB v 040501 ASLT SMeL CII 95-002589 2 HB0102 TUREK TIM HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION: 15(#0 THE TRAND, HB 040501 ASLT SMPL .CIT 95-002690 LOCATION: 1231 7TH ST., HB 040501 ASLT SMP.. CIT 95-002808 LOCATION: 2620:.HERMOSA AV. 040501 ASLI SMPL CIT 95-002956 LOCATION: 1.617 PCH, HB 3 HB0100 MITCHELL KIM HBP080 PC 242 2 HB0106 ENDOM STEVE HBP073 PC 242 , HB 3 HB0126 COOK NANCY HBP080 PC 242 fd BATTERY 05/21/95 0205 SUN DESCRIPTION: 05/29/95 1332 MON DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 05/29/95 DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 06/04/95 0230 DESCRIPTION: MON H80109 C SUN HB0114 C BATTERY 06/06/95 0315 TUE DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 06/08/95 0433 THU DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 06/09/95 2042 FRI HB0131 C DESCRIPTION: DOMESTIC VIOL 06/17/95 2130 SAT DESCRIPTION: 06/27/95 TUE H80071 C BATTERY 06/29/95 1554 THU HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: DESCRIPTION: 56 57 58 S5 6o (0 2 63 6Li STALKING 06/30/95 0330 FRI P 65 DESCRIPTION: 6�T CORP INJURY 07/02/95 2225 SUN P 6'g DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 07/08/95 1915 SAT HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: OFFICER INJURED ON DUTY BATTERY 07/15/95 1600 SAT 7 0 DESCRIPTION: T] I' -�a ASLT-A 07/02/95 0230 SUN DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 07/02/95 2045 SUN DESCRIPIION: • BATTERY 07/22/95 2030 SAT HB0109 C DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 07/30/95 2215 SUN DESCRIPTION: RECLISCRI (BM) CRIME RECORDS BY NATIONAL CODE FROM 040000 TO 040502 (DATE FROM 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95) REPORTING NATCOD DESCRIPTION CASE NO. RD OFICER NAME CLERK TY SECTION AS OF 07 -Feb -96 01:29 PM PAGE 5 • OCCURRENCE CLOSE DESCRIPTION DATE TIME DOW OFICER STAT 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-003007 2 HB0122 BOHACIK DAVID RC001 PC 242 LOCATION: 2644 HERMOSA AV., HB _ 040501 ASLI SMPL CIT 95-003169 1 HB0078 THOMPSON TOM RC001 PC 242 LOCATION, . 58 PIER AV., HB 040501 ASLI SMPL CIT 95-003185 3 HB0145 VAUGHAN CHRIS HBC078 PC 242 LOCATION: 831 8TH.ST., HB 31_040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-003259 1 HB0078 THOMPSON IOM HBC078 PC 242 LOCATION: 940 THE STRAND, HB 040501 ASLI SMPL CIT 95-003500 3 HB0095 HART1 STEVE HBC078 PC 242 LOCATION: 710 4TH ST., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-003536 2 HB0079 PHILLIPS BRUC HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION; 34 17TH ST., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-003559 2 HB0102 TUREK TIM HBC078 PC 242 LOCATION: 126 29TH ST., HB 040501 ASLI SMPL LIT 95-003634 1 HB0126 COOK NANCY HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION: 540 PIER AV., HB J1_040501 ASLT SMPL CIT LOCATION: 95-003700 1 HB0119 �0 PIE_ R AV , HB /,\040501 ASLI SMPL CIT LOCATION»• r 95-003761 1 HB0142 BEACH DR. /11TH ST. , JAAKOLA LANCE HBP073 PC 242 AVERILL, KEVI HBP073 PC 245(A) HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CII 95-003928 2 HB0121 VINCENT WILLI HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION:•• 2300 HERMOSA AV., HB 040501 ASLI SMPL CIT 95-003966 1 HB0100 MITCHELL KIM HBP073 PC 243 LOCATION; 50 PIER AV., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-003993 2 HB0119 JAAKOLA LANCE HBP080 PC 242 LOCATION: 0 13TH ST., HB 3(.940501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-004177 1 HB0053 WHIPKEY JAMES RC001 LOCATION: 1035 HERMOSA AV., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-004273 3 HB0140 HEARD LANCE HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION: 229 PACIFIC COAST HY., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL•CIT 95-004361 3 HB0140 HEARD LANCE HBP070 PC 242 LOCATION: 2615 PACIFIC COAST HY., HB 41-040501 ASLI, SMPL CIT 95-004391 1 HB0106 ENDOM STEVE HBP075 LOCATION: • 30 PIER AV., HB It. 040501 ASLI SMPL CIT 95-004405 1 HB0100 MITCHELL KIM HBP080 PC 242 LOCATION: R AV., HB 11 BATTERY 08/02/95 2157 WED DESCRIPTION: BATIERY 08/12/95 0130 SAT DESCRIPTION: /3 7f BATTERY 08/12/95 1030 SAT HB0109 C `j S DESCRIPTION: REFER 95-3673 FOR ADDITIONAL BATTERY 08/19/95 DESCRIPTION: SAT C 74 BATTERY 09/03/95 1900 SUN DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 09/05/95 1900 TUE H80121 DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 09/09/95 0345 SAT DESCRIPTION: C C C 3.7 7C1 BATTERY 09/12/95 2140 TUE HB0109 C S� DESCRIPTION: SEE ALSO DR 95-3633 BATTERY 09/19/95 0118 TUE HB0121 C 8 DESCRIPTION: ASLT-A 09/23/95 0730 SAT HB0109 P 8 �- DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 09/16/95 1700 SAT HB0121 C 83 DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 10/06/95 2325 FRI HB0121 C DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 10/08/95 1815 SUN 8 DESCRIPTION: 10/20/95 1230 FRI U 6 BATTERY 10/26/95 1140 THU HB0121 C $ 7 DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 11/02/95 THU. DESCRIPTION: 11/04/95 SAT ,g7 BATTERY 11/05/95 1705 SUN C( 0 DESCRIPTION: DESCRIPTION: DESCRIPTION: RECLISCRI (BM) CRIME RECORDS BY NATIONAL CODE FROM 040000 TO 040502 (DATE FROM 01/01/95 TO 12/31/95) REPORTING NATCOO DESCRIPTION LASE NO. RD OFICER NAME AS OF 07 -Feb -96 01:29 PM PAGE 6 OCCURRENCE CLOSE CLERK TY SECTION DESCRIPTION DATE TIME DOW OFICER STAT 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-004450 1 HB0053 WHIPKEY JAMES RC001 Ntr LOCATION: 934 HERMOSA AV. HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIi 95-004539 2 HB0079 PHILLIPS BRUC HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION:: THE STRAND /27TH ST. , HB w_040501 ASLI SMPL Cli 95-004597 1 HB0079 PHILLIPS BRUC HBP073 PC 242 LOCATION: 934 HERMOSA AV., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-004599 1 HB0122 BOHACIK DAVID HBP079 PC 242 LOCATION: 540 PIER AV., HB L 040501 ASLT SMPL CIi 95-004626 2 HB0143 RAMIREZ, JAIM HBP073 PC 242 LOCAIION: 1222 HERMOSA AV., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CII 95-004704 1 HB0100 MITCHELL KIM HBP073 PC 242 LOCAIION: 1Q42 IHE STRAND, HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-004763 3 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBC081 PC 242 LOCATION: 20.1 PROSPECT AV., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-004798 3 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBP073 PC 273.5 LOCATION':. 1203 8TH 5T., HB 040501 ASLT .SMPL CIT 95-004806 1 HB0100 MITCHELL KIM HBP080 PC 242 LOCATION; 0 PIER AV., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-004832 2 HB0142 AVERILL, KEVI HBP073 PC 273.5 LOCATION.. HA 17IH 5T., Hb 040501 ASLT SMPL CIT 95-004961 1 HB0141 CHARLES BILL HBP073 PC 245(A) LOCATION: 90•] MONTEREY BL., HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CI'T 95-004970 3 HB0143 RAMIREZ, JAIN HBP073 PC 242 LOCATIQN: PCH /9TH SI. , HB 040501 ASLT SMPL CIi LOCATION: 2001 040501 ASLT'SMPL CIT LOCATION: 2001 040502 ASLI SMPL PO LOCATION: 74' t11,040502 ASL/ SMPL PO LOCATION: 1400 95-005078 3 HB0144 STRATIS, NICH HBP073 PC 242 PCH, HB 96-000088 3 H80095 HARTT SIEVE HBP056 PC 242 PCH, HB 95-000104 1 HB0141 CHARLES BILL HBC079 PC 243(8) PIER AV.. HB 95-003187 2 HB0109 ECKERT THOMAS HBC078 PC 243(B) THE STRAND, HB 106 CRIME RECORDS PRINTED 1 Z DESCRIPTION: BATTERY DESCRIPTION: BATTERY DESCRIPTION: BATTERY DESCRIPTION: BATTERY DESCRIPTION: BATTERY DESCRIPTION: 11/09/95 1612 THU 11/16/95 0100 THU HB0121 11/21/95 1759 TUE HB0126 CT 18 DEC 95 11/20/95 2100 MON 11/25/95 0155 SAT HB0121 12/01/95 2348 FRI HB0109 BATTERY 12/06/95 1840 WED DESCRIPTION: c R3 q C �1S C CORP INJURY 12/09/95 1610 SAT HB0126 C58 DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 12/10/95 0023 SUN DESCRIPTION: CORP INJURY 12/10/95 1800 SUN HB0109 C P DESCRIPTION: ASLI-A 12/22/95 2340 FRI HB0126 C 1 DI DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 12/23/95 SAT HB0121 C P. DESCRIPTION: BATTERY 12/31/95 1812 SUN HB0121 C 103 DESCRIPTION: i BATTERY 10/01/95 0000 SUN P 10`f DESCRIPTION: BATTERY OFFCR 01/08/95 0000 SUN HB0131 C IGS' DESCRIPTION: ASLT ON OFF.N.COOK BATTERY OFFCR 08/13/95 1140 SUN C ( ° 6 DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT 3 ■tl City of Hermosa Beach: CRIME TYPES The State and Federal governments track "Part I Crimes" as an indication of local, regional, and national crime trends. These crimes were selected in the 1920's because they share similar characteristics in most states and are most likely to be consistently reported. The Federal government calls the system "Uniform Crime Reporting". Part I Crimes include homicide. rape. robbery. assault. burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft. and arson. Attempt homicide is scored as an assault. Rape includes attempt rape. Robbery is the taking of property from a person using force or fear Assault includes felony and misdemeanor assault and battery. Burglary statistics in this report include residential. commercial, vehicle, boat, and attempt burgaries. Larceny includes felony and misdemeanor thefts. 13 O O MURDER O 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 (0) (0) (1) (0) 1995 (1) 1990 (2) 1992 (3) RAPE 1993 (4) 1994 (5) 1995 (1) 1990 (30) 1991 (33) 1992 (35) ROBBERY 1993 (32) 1994 (40) 1995 (18) 180- 160- 140- 120- 100- 80- 60- 40- 80 -160--140-120-100-80-60- 40- 20- 20- 1990 1990 (119) 1991 (126) 1992 (105) ASSAULT 1993 (93) 1994 (118) 1995 (119) 1990 (345) 1991 (328) 1992 (273) BURGLARY 1993 (292) 1994 (211) 1995 (174) 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 1990 (508) 1991 (687) 1992 (652) LARCENY 1993 (594) 1994 (557) 1995 (498) 18' 16' 14t 12' 10' 80 60 40 20 0 1990 (130) 1991 (173) MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 1992 (172) 1993 (159) 1994 (144) 1995 (117) 45' 40' 35, 30! 25' 20' 15' 10' 50 0 1990 (444) 1991 (395) 1992 (334) DRUNK DRIVERS 1993 (277) 1994 (272) 1995 (249) 30 25 20 15 10 50 1990 (276) 1991 (251) • PLAIN DRUNK ARRESTS 1992 (263) 1993 (223) 1994 (258) 1995 (244) pRC EXHIBIT 4 PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTER 2150 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 900 Berkeley, California 94704 (510) 486-1111 Fax: (510) 644-0594 This copy provided by Citizens to Save Hermo: Beach 376-4626 POLICY BRIEF: ALCOHOL AVAILABILITY, DRUNKEN DRIVING, AND ALCOHOL-RELATED CASUALTIES What Do We Mean by the Availability of Alcohol? Individual consumers of alcohol, whether underage or adult, obtain and consume alcohol in many different environments.' In California, the typical adult consumer finds alcohol for sale at bars and restaurants, grocery, drug, liquor and convenience stores, at stadiums, on plants, trains and ships, at flower shops and gas stations. In addition, he or she may find alcohol given away at no cost at wineries, breweries and, of course, from friends and relatives on social occasions. The costs of a drink may range from nothing to as much as $11.25 per pure ethanol ounce.2 The physical and economic availability of alcohol refers to the number of places one can obtain a drink and the costs of a drink at those places. While the economic costs of alcohol are set by market forces, economies of sole and state tax regulations, the physical availability of alcohol, where alcohol is sold and where alcohol is given away, is often under the control of local county and community regulators. From the point of view of the community, alcohol availability refers to the physical closeness of alcohol outlets to community people. How do We Measure the Physical Availability of Alcohol? The physical availability of alcohol is measured in two ways: First, we can ask how many alcohol outlets there are for every 1000 people in the community. Second, we can ask how many alcohol outlets there are per square mile. For example, in California there are about 71,000 retail outlet licenses allowing the sale of alcohol. This is about 2 licenses per 1000 people, or 1 license every 2 square miles. While the first number reflects the distribution of'outlets by population (population density), the second reflects the difficulty of getting to and from outlets in terms of geographic distance (geographic density). Regardless of population density, how far apart alcohol outlets are reflects the ease or difficulty of obtaining alcohol. Thus, in some places in California physical access to alcohol is very high (17 licensed outlets per square mile in San Francisco County). In other places in California physical access to alcohol is very low (1 licensed outlet every 10 square miles in Mendocino County). Ifwe want to talk about the ease or difficulty of obtaining alcohol, we should measure availability in terms of miles, not people. A NATIONAL CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACHES TO PREVENTION OF ALCOHOL-RELATED PROBLEMS A PROJECT OF THE PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION Does the Physical Availability of Alcohol Influence Alcohol Consumption? Yes. A long history of research studies indicates that increased pphysical availability of alcohol is related to increased drinking and increased alcohol problems.3-13 These studies have been conducted at the national, state and community level in both the United States and Canada and have examined differences in availability between places (for example, between cities) and over many different time periods. Why Does the Physical Availability of Alcohol Affect Consumption? Moving outlets geographically apart, or spreading them out across a community, is theorized to increase the difficulty of obtaining alcohol due to increased travel time and inconvenience (increasing the "full price" of alcohol).14-15 In addition to the costs of drinks themselves, the consumer has to pay the added costs of traveling to and from alcohol outlets. This makes drinking more expensive in terms of time and trouble and reduces the amounts individuals consume. Alternative ways of decreasing the time and trouble involved in purchasing alcohol are to combine the purchase of alcohol with other activities such as regular shopping trips, going to and from work, and so on.13,15 Clearly, the wide availability of alcohol in grocery stores helps minimize travel costs by making alcohol available at the same retail locations at which food must be obtained. As such, theory suggests that reduced physical availability makes alcohol more expensive to consume in terms of time, trouble and money, but that this effect can be mitigated somewhat by changes in routine activities associated with the purchase of alcohol. Is There a Relationship Between Availability and Drunken Driving? Yes. In several studies from the past decade researchers found a direct relationship between the availability of alcohol, alcohol consumption, arrests for drunken driving and car crashes related to alcohol use.7-9 Supplementary work in the area supported the observation that greater availability was related to greater alcohol consumption, and that greater consumption was related to greater levels of arrests for drunken driving.74 These studies suggest that to the degree reduced availability reduces consumption, reduced consumption will lead to reduced drunken driving. More recent research has shirt that a 1% increase in beer consumption leads to a 1.2% increase in fatal alcohol- related crashes. This reflects the fact that beer drinking ispost prevalent among young drinkers and those most likely to experience an alcohol-related crash. What are the Relationships Between Alcohol Availability and Drunken Driving? Alcohol outlets which serve the largest proportion of drinkers will produce the largest proportion of a community's drunken drivers. In a pair of recent community based studies, researchers have demonstrated significant lis between the availability of alcohol at bars and restaurants and crashes related to drunken driving. The availability of alcohol at bars, restaurants, food and liquor stores can also be related to patterns of traffic crashes across comirnities. The patterns of these crashes cluster around areas where restaurant densities are greatest. Used about twice as often as bars for the consumption of alcohol, restaurants in California appear to supply the greatest proportion of drunken drivers. 1, 4- But Won't Spreading Out Outlets Encourage Drinkers to Drive Between Bars and Restaurants, and Increase Drinking and Driving Problems? No. Previous research suggested that reducelm ilability might lead to increases, rather than decreases, in alcohol related traffic problems. Since consumers would have further to chive to drink, and further to chive after drinldng, it was assumed that drunken driving and alcohol-related traffic problems would increase with decreases in availability. This observation has not been borne out in more recent research.74,16 It appears that the decrease in drinking obtained through reductions in availability outweighs any increases in alcohol related traffic problems related to increased travel between outlets. Is There a Relationship Between Availability and Alcohol -Related Violence? Yes. In a recent study of the relationship between homicide and alcohol, alcohol outlet density was significantly related to rates of homicide even after important factors like poverty and family structure were accounted for.22 With increased alcohol availability leading to increased consumption, and noting the observed relationships between drinking and violent crime (rape, assault and robbery),23 increases in the availability of alcohol may well result in increases in these violent outcomes. In more recent research at the community level, among 74 larger cities in the lis Angeles County, rates of assaultive violence were related to higher levels of alcohol outlet density. What Can Communities do to Reduce Problems Related to the Availability of Alcohol? With proper community action, planning and zoning regulations already in effect in your community can be used to restrain the proliferation of alcohol outlets. Planning and zoning regulations can be used to limit the growth of new alcohol outlets and regulate the behavior of current retailers in your community. These regulations can be used to limit the concentration of outlets in community areas through the introduction of distance requirements, placement of caps on the numbers of outlets permitted in community zones, or restrictions on the proximity of outlets to public facilities such as parks, beaches, recreation areas, schools, and churches. By reducing the physical availability of alcohol in your community you are reducing access to alcohol for both youth and adults, changing the relationship between drinking and drunken driving, and effectively reducing the opportunity of drinkers to drive when drunk. REFERENCES 1. Single, E. and Wortley, S. Drinking in various settings as it relates to demographic variables and level of consumption: Findings from a national survey in Canada. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, a 590-599,1993. 2. Treno, Al, Nephew, T.M., Ponicki, W.R., and Gruenewald, P.J. Alcohol beverage price spectra: Opportunities for substitution. Alcoholism: Clinical and.Experimental Research.1 , 675-680, 1993. 3. Smart, R.G. The relationship of availability of alcoholic beverages to per capita consumption and alcoholism rates. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 3_$, 891-896, 1977. 4. Parker, D.A., Woltz, M.W., and Harford, T.C. The prevention of alcoholism: An empirical report on the effects of outlet availability. Alcoholism: Clinical and Ental Reserach, 2, 339-343, 1978. ZS' 5. Harford, T.C., Parker, D.A., Pautler, C., and Woltz, M. • Relationship between the number of on - premise outlets and alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 40 1053-1057, 1979. 6. Smart, R.G. Availability and the prevention of alcohol-related problems. In T.C. Harford, D.A. Parker, and L. Light (eds.) Normative Approaches to the Prevention of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. pp. 123-146. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Research Monograph #3. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980. 7. Rush, B.R., Gliksman, L., and Brook, R. Alcohol availability, alcohol consumption and alcohol related damage. I. The distribution of consumption model. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47 1-10, 1986. 8. Gliksman, L. and Rush, B.R. Alcohol availability, alcohol consumption and alcohol related damage. II. The role of sociodemographic factors. journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47 11-18, 1986. 9. Watts, R.K. and Rabow, J. Alcohol availability and alcohol-related problems in 213 California cities. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 7 47-58, 1983. 10. Gruenewald, P.J., Madden, P., and Janes, K. Alcohol availability and the formal power and resources of state alcohol beverage control agencies. Alcoholism: Clinical and E Research, 6 591-597,1992. 11. Gruenewald, P.J., Ponicki, W.R, and Holder, H.D. The relationship of outlet densities to alcohol consumption: A time series cross-sectional analysis. Alcoholism: Clinical And Experimental Research,l?, 38-47, 1993. 12. Ensor, T. and Godfrey, C. Modelling the interactions between alcohol, crime and the criminal justice system. Addiction, 88 477-487, 1993. 13. Abbey, A., Scott, R.O., and Smith, M.J. Physical, subjective, and social availability: Their relationship to alcohol consumption in rural and urban areas. Addiction, $8 489-499, 1993. 14. Grossman, M. Health economics of prevention of alcohol-related problems. Paper presented at the workshop on Health Economics of Prevention and Treatment of Alcohol -Related Problems, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Washington, DC, 1988. 15. Gruenewald, P.J. Alcohol problems and control of availability: Theoretical and empirical issues. In M.E. Hilton and G. Bloss (eds.) Economics and the Prevention of AIohol-Related Problem . NIAAA Research Monograph #25, Washington. DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993. 16. Gruenewald, P.J. and Ponicki, W.R. The relationship of the retail availability of alcohol and alcohol sales to alcohol related traffic crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2,,Z, 249-259, 1995. 17. Gruenewald, P.J., Mitchell, P.R. and Treno, A.J. Drinking and driving: Drinking patterns and drinking problems. Addiction, in press, 1996. 18. Scribner, R.A., MacKinnon, D.P. and Dwycr, J.H. Alcohol outlet density and motor vehicle crashes in Los Angeles County cities. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, E 447-453, 1994. 19. Gruenewald, P.J., Millar, A., Treno, A.J., Ponicki, W.R, Yang, Z. and Roeper, P. The geography of alcohol availability and driving after drinking- A cross-sectional spatial analysis. Addictimn, in press, 1996. 20. Smart, R.G. and Docherty, D Effects of the introduction of on -premise drinking in alcohol-related accidents and impaired driving. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 11, 683-686, 1976. 21. Colon, I. and Cutter, H.S.G. Relationship of beer consumption and state alcohol and motor vehicle policies to fatal accidents. Journal of Safely Research, L 83-89, 1983. 22. Parker, R.N. and Rebhun, L. -A. Alcohol and Homicide: A Deadly Combination of Two American Traditions. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995. 23. Cook, P. and Moore, M. Economic perspectives on reducing alcohol-related violence. In press, 1992. 24. Scribner, R.A., MacKinnon, D.P., and Dwyer, J.H. The risk of a'sa'iltive violence and alcohol availability in Los Angeles County. American Journal of Public Health, 85 335-340, 1995. Z� �...� fe- 1`6-5815/ April 2, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1996 SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95-17 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) 95-8 844 HERMOSA AVENUE Kazu Miyama 934 Hermosa Ave., California Beach APPELLANT: Jim Lissner REQUEST: TO ALLOW ON -SALE ALCOHOL (BEER AND WINE) IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOSED RESTAURANT, AND 2ND STORY OFFICES Planning Commission Recommendation Sustain the Planning Commission's approval Background: At the Planning Commission Meeting of February 20, 1996, the Planning Commission approved the proposed Precise Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit excluding the request for live entertainment. Analysis The proposed development is in compliance with all the current zoning standards and policies, including height, setbacks, and parking. The building is a contemporary design with large areas of exposed glass, metal trellis canopy and raked roof of flat concrete tile. The project is adjacent to residential uses and staff and the Planning Commission noted concerns regarding the noise impact on the surrounding area. Mitigation conditions have been included in the resolution of approval to address this issue. Concerns regarding noise eminating from lanai doors along the south wall of the building were also addressed and if an outside garden area is used for outdoor dining the CUP should be amended to address this condition. Potential problems from odors from a proposed trash 1 area have been noted and addressed in the conditions of approval. Therefore staff believes that the new building construction will ensure that the project is designed to accomodate the proposed use and that it is commensurate revitalization goals for the downtown. CONCUR: wpiwo Sol : umenf: d, Director Community Development Department Steve Bu ell, ty r ager 1Vfic ael Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. City Council Resolution concurring with Planning Commission Approval 2. Planning Commission Resolution 3. Planning Commission minutes 4. Planning Commission Staff report 5. Site, floor plans and elevations wpa9517 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 C.C. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW ON -SALE, BEER AND WINE, AND CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOSED RESTAURANT AT 844 HERMOSA AVENUE, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 23, AND 24, OF TRACT NO 1564. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 9, 1996 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following findings: A. The site is zoned C-2, Restricted Commercial, and the proposed development and use are consistent with the standards of said zone; B. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding commercial uses; C. The imposition of conditions as required by the Planning Commission resolution will mitigate any negative impacts on nearby residential or commercial properties; D The parking required for this development is zero for that portion of the project equal to a F.A.R. 1:1 and 65% of the parking requirement for that portion over 1:1, since it is located within the Downtown Enhancement District (DED), and pursuant to Section 1152.5 of the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to the Certified Coastal Land Use Plan, the reduced requiered parking is supported by the following findings: 1. Fewer than 96,250 square feet of commercial development, including new buildings, expansions, and/or intensification of uses in the DED has received a Coastal Development Permit since November 1, 1994. 2. There is currently adequate parking to support the development and to provide adequate beach parking. 3. A parking study recently completed for the downtown show the occupancy of the parking spaces in the downtown is 90% or less during daylight hours on summer 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 weekends, and no more than 24,063 square feet of commercial development has occurred since the study. E. __ The The Staff Environmental Review Committee has prepared an environmental assessment and determined that the project, with mitigation measures incorporated to reduce off-site impacts results in less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a mitigated negative declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY SUSTAIN THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF ON -SALE ALCOHOL BEER AND WINE, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOSED RESTAURANT, SUBJECT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ADOPTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIs 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 1996 President of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY cua9517 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 96-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW ON -SALE, BEER AND WINE, AND CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOSED RESTAURANT AT 844 HERMOSA AVENUE, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 23, AND 24, OF TRACT NO 1564. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 20, 1996 to receive oral and written testimony regarding this matter and made the following findings: A. The site is zoned C-2, Restricted Commercial, and the proposed development and use are consistent with the standards of said zone; B. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding commercial uses; C. The imposition of conditions as required by this resolution will mitigate any negative impacts on nearby residential or commercial properties; D The parking required for this development is zero for that portion of the project equal to a F.A.R. 1:1 and 65% of the parking requirement for that portion over 1:1, since it is located within the Downtown Enhancement District (DED), and pursuant to Section 1152.5 of the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to the Certified Coastal Land Use Plan, the reduced requiered parking is supported by the following findings: 1. Fewer than 96,250 square feet of commercial development, including new buildings, expansions, and/or intensification of uses in the DED has received a Coastal Development Permit since November 1, 1994. 2. There is currently adequate parking to support the development and to provide adequate beach parking. 3. A parking study recently completed for the downtown show the occupancy of the parking spaces in the downtown is 90% or less during daylight hours on summer 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 weekends, and no more than 24,063 square feet of commercial development has occurred since the study. E. The Staff Environmental Review Committee has prepared an environmental assessment Oand determined that the project, with mitigation measures incorporated to reduce off-site impacts results in less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a mitigated negative declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING. COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY APPROVE ON -SALE ALCOHOL BEER AND WINE, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SECTION I Specific Conditions of Approval 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans. Modifications to the plans shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. The rear door, emergency exit, facing the alley shall remain closed at all times during business hours, and shall be equipped with panic hardware including an alarm and a self closing door mechanism; equipment shall be maintained in operational order at all times. 3. The rear roll -up door shall be maintained closed at all times except during deliveries, and trash pick-up. 4. Storage of trash bins or cans outside of the designated trash bin storagearea shown on submitted plans is prohibited. 5. Odor elimination equipment shall be installed for the trash bin area; venting untreated air from this room shall be prohibited. 6. Deliveries to the rear doors on Palm Dr. shall be prohibited between 9:00 P1Vpand 9:00 AM. 7. Use of the rear parking shall be for employees only; Signs shall be installed restricting parking to employee use. 8. A bicycle rack for a minimum of 6 bikes shall be provided; location shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. 9. Live entertainment is prohibited 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION II General operating and standard conditions: 1. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments in the vicinity. 2. The business shall prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business, or in the immediate area. 3. The Police Chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may, subject to the review of the Planning Commission, direct the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem and then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will automatically initiate a review of this Conditional Use Permit by the Commission. 4. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. 5. Any changes to the interior layout which alter the primary use of the restaurant space shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 6. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 7. The business shall participate in the City's downtown parking validation program, providing validations for parking in public lots for no less than two hours. 8. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. Noise emanating from the property shall be monitored to verify compliance with the noise ordinance in response to any complaints. 9. The building shall be equipped with acoustic features to maximize sound proofing which shall include the use of double -pane windows or an equivalent and the installation of air conditioning so that windows and doors can remain closed during performances. a. The lanai windows shall remain closed during all performances and when any form of music is playing. 10. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department. SECTION III This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid an enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from__any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attomey's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. VOTE: AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, DiMonda, Merl, Perrotti, Chrmn. Tucker NOES: none ABSTAIN: none ABSENT: none CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 96-13 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their reeeting of Feruary 20, 1996. Peter Tucker, hairman Sol Blumenfeletary 3- 1? -9 Date cupr9517 2 Se concerns. He suggested limitation of deliveries to certain times during the day to decrease impa not' g he felt this project would be a nice addition to the downtown area. MOTI by Comm. Dettelbach, Seconded by Comm. Merl, to APPROVE this application AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Merl, Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker NOES: •ne ABSENT: No ABSTAIN: None Chmn. Tucker stated this ision could be appealed to the City Council w 10 days from this date. 12. CUP 96-1 -- COND ON -SALE BEER AN RESTAURANT AT 500 PA IONAL USE PERMIT MINO ' AMENDMENT TO ALLOW WINE IN CONJUNC ON WITH AN EXISTING FIC COAST HIGHW : , CITY MEX GRILL Staff Recommended Action: To a rove said Co • itional Use Permit minor amendment. Planning Director Schubach said the applican h restaurant with full alcohol, but wished to continu The same conditions are recommended as thos= imp occupies the other half Chmn. Tucker opened the Public Hearin• at 9:53 p.m. taken over one half of a previously existing restaurant with only a beer and wine license. ed on the recently approved restaurant which J.L. Jackson, 16161 Nordhoff St. orth Hills, applicant's represe .tive, said he had no reservations with any or all of the current Co • issioners hearing this case and m. 'ng a decision. He said he had sketched the front one third . • would provide a architect's drawing to s . No one else wished to s ak, and Chmn. Tucker closed the Public Hearing at 9. 5 p.m. MOTION by Co . Merl, Seconded by Chmn. Tucker, to APPROVE Staffs reco endation. AYES: Comm. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Merl Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker NOES: None AB SEN : None ABS None 13. PDP 95-8/CUP 95-17 -- PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NEW 6200 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE BEER AND WINE AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 844 HERMOSA AVENUE, CALIFORNIA BEACH RESTAURANT Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. 9 P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 Planning Director Schubach said the existing business wished to relocate. Staff had concerns about noise, while _finding the design attractive. He described the suggested conditions which would mitigate the noise and ventilation problems. A 23 foot turning area has been allowed, with employee only parking in the back of the building. Chmn. Tucker opened the Public Hearing at 10:00 p.m. Vernon Saks, project architect, 200 Pier Ave., Ste. 22, said the folding doors would be accordion style, french doors will be hinged together, a guard rail will be provided, live entertainment will probably be provided once a week, when music is played the doors will be closed, the typical dining hours will be from 5:30 to 10:00 p.m. and sometimes to 11:00 p.m. Churn. Tucker suggested the gate be an emergency -only exit with an alarm for security. Mr. Saks said that gate was only for the gardener's use. The applicant serves only beer and wine, with no other liquor. Sheila Donahue -Miller, felt the enlargement would increase people and service of alcohol. She expressed concern about impact on nearby residents, noting the City and Police do not enforce Conditions. Brian Kotch, 59 9th Street, objected to live entertainment which could cause noise. He asked live entertainment be denied at this time. He discussed the problems he has experienced as a result of patrons using his lawn and property for sleeping and making noise. Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, detailed the assaults that had happened at this location. He objected to the expansion and possible cumulative impact caused by liquor -serving establishments. Rebuttal Vernon Saks, applicant, described the proposed building, noting six parking spaces were being provided which allowed the building size to be increased to 7,380 square feet. Mitigations are addressing most of the problems, which management taking responsibility for noises coming from their business. He said this was a restaurant, not a bar, which was used while waiting for a table. He said the applicant does not own the building, but does have a lease. No one else wished to speak, and Chmn. Tucker closed the Public Hearing at 10:14 p.m. Comm. Dettelbach said the business currently used pre-recorded music, feeling there was not a need for an entertainment permit at this time, to which Churn. Tucker and Comm. Di Monda stated agreement. Comm. Merl agreed the live entertainment was of concern. Comm. Perrotti felt the double paned windows, installation of air conditioning and door closure served to mitigate the noise. MOTION by Comm. Dettelbach, Seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to APPROVE this project, excluding live entertainment. 10 P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 AYES: Comm. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Merl Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 1 TEXT 95-9 — TEXT AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING T DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS (Continued from December 5, 1995 and Janua v 16, 996 meetings) Sta!'fRecommended Action: To recommend approval of said text amendment Director Blume ni- Id said Staff had a problem dealing with the definition of "histori ign". The issue of historic architec e can be addressed via Section K, Roof Signs, by statin: at if an area has historically been use.. a sign board, which is an architectural projection, this enough criteria to permit it as a new sign . a. Comm. Di Monda discussed current historical si ► age with Staff. Chmn. Tucker opened the Pu is Hearing at 10:27 p.m. No one wishe • to speak, and Chmn. Tucker closed the Public Hearing at 10: p.m. MOTION -by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. recommendation. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ettelbach, to APPROVE Staffs Comm. Dettelbach, Di Monda, erl Perro ►1, Chinn. Tucker None None None 15. TEXT 96-2 -- TEXT AME PERMITTED USE LIST. ADD YOUTH HOSTEL TO C-2 Staff Recommended Action: o recommend approval o .'d text amendment. Director Blumenfeld said this ite Avenue. A new tenant wish rather than a hotel or mo Blumenfeld said the issu C-2 and C-3 zones. C many hours of oper Blumenfeld disc Comm. Di Mo Santa Barbar was related to a compliance order i to establish a youth hostel, described mo The permitted use list does not provide efore the Commission was text amendment to pe . Tucker said he did not agree with the "youth hostel ion, lock out times and access are not addressed in the de ed the ability to establish development standards which are a part a discussed with Director Blumenfeld the operation and planning of yo ued to the property at 26 Pier as a residential dormitory or such use. ' Director t youth hostels in the efinition. He said 'tion. Director Chapter 10. hostels in and other cities. Chmn. .cker opened the Public Hearing at 10:35 p.m. Mi Rossi, 536 Homer Street, Manhattan Beach, introduced the hostel manager, Pascel Olivia. P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95-17 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) 95-8 LOCATION: 844 HERMOSA AVENUE APPLICANT: Kazu Miyama California Beach REQUEST: February 14, 1996 Regular Meeting of February 20, 1996 TO ALLOW ON -SALE ALCOHOL (BEER AND WINE) AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED RESTAURANT, AND 2ND STORY OFFICES Recommendation To approve the proposed project subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. Background PROJECT INFORMATION: ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: SITE AREA PROPOSED FLOOR AREA OF RESTAURANT PROPOSED AREA OF OFFICES+EQUIP. RM. EXISTING USE: PROPOSED PARKING: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Analysis C-2, Restricted Commercial General Commercial 5,880 Sq. Ft. 4,351 Sq. ft 2,095 Offices (to be demolished) 6 spaces Mitigated Negative declaration (Mitigation incorporated mto conditions of approval) The proposed development is in compliance with all the current zoning standards and policies, including height, setbacks, and parking. The building is a contemporary design with large areas of exposed glass, metal trellis canopy and raked roof of flat concrete tile. The project parking is provided pursuant to Downtown requirements; parking for only that portion of the project exceeding 1:1 F.A.R. has been provided at 65% of required parking (1 space per 250 sq. ft. of gross floor area). The primary concern as noted by the Environmental Review Committee is the noise impact on the surrounding area. Mitigating conditions have been included in the resolution of approval to address this issue. Further concerns of staff are the lanai doors along the south wall which open onto a "garden" (if this area is intended for outdoor seating this CUP will need to be amended), and the potential odor problems emanating from the trash area. Strong fish odors have been noted by staff at the current restaurant location, and complaints have been received in the past regarding odors. Conditions have been included regarding closure of the lanai doors during entertainment and the elimination of odors in the resolution of approval. The new building construction will ensure that the project is designed to accommodate the proposed use. Entertainment uses will be designed into the project with proper noise attenuation and trash service problems will be addressed with provision of a trash enclosure/bin storage area within the building. CONCUR: Sol : umenfel� , D' ector Community D : elopment Department Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Site, floor plans and elevations a p9517 13 Mi ae Schubach Planning Director 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 376-4626 March 11, 1996 City Council City of Hermosa Beach Honorable Councilmembers: We wish to appeal the recent planning commission approvals of CUP's or PUP's for the following projects: 1. Hennesseys expansion into Diana's, at 2, 4, & 8 Pier Avenue 2. California Beach moving southward to 834-644 Hermosa Avenue 3. The building and Einsteins brewpub at 1301 Manhattan Avenue We each enclose our personal check in payment of the fee for appeal. Thank you, Shirley Cassell Wendy Doeh Richard Everett Parker Herriott Adele Icaza James Lissner Sheila Miller Robin Paterson Robert Simpson Brice Torres Joseph Vogl Lawrence O. Fordiani P. O. Box 423 Redondo Beach, Calif. 90277 310-372-1262 Fax 310-379-1042 March 29, 1996 City Council of Hermosa Beach c/o Community Development Department Planning Division 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254 Re: California Beach Restaurant April 9, 1996 Public Hearing Dear Council Members: RECEIVED APR - 2 1996 CITY MGR. OFFICE I'm writing to relate my concerns on the proposed construction of a 6200 sq. ft. restaurant/bar (California Beach), at 844 Hermosa Ave. I own a single family residence at 710 Hermosa Ave., which is approximately 100 yards to the south of said project. Also, I've been a Hermosa Beach homeowner for the past 15 years; currently reside with my family in the valley section. I perceive this project will have a NEGATIVE IMPACT on the surrounding residential neighborhood. Please note my following reasons to support my conclusion. 1. INADEQUATE PARKING for the project, will place added strain on the current limited parking available in the area. 2. NOISE ELEMENT created by a restaurant/bar of this magnitude, adjacent to residential properties. 3. The project is located at the southernly end of the downtown com- mercial district, which is a mixture of commercial and residential. 4. The project is being represented has a restaurant only! What's the need for a D.J. on the premises? The current operation would represent more of a bar/restaurant environment. IS page 2 5. The project is replacing a existing medical building which was and is more -appropriate for the location. Said existing building and business did not generate any type of negative impact to the surrounding neighborhood. In conclusion I ask that you either REJECT the project or DOWNSIZE the project so as not to generate a negative impact on the surrounding residen- tial neighborhood. Also I think it would be wise that Council take a close look at the overall nature of development in the downtown area. Thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. Yours very trul Lawrence • . Fordiani Hermosa Beach Homeowner Hermosa Beach Property Owner 16 r I to 11 • 1.e, V WO" n2010e21Y 1.124 rMOaY . AWN. CAW. MNIs V 0 a 3 m i TMA01 / P0202L1110 1040 000 FAMED /71•11918 r'7 : y7F I]' 9 itii.,. iiih ,. ime, t_. Ilarais NMI TAA.! larceet Ivaco w 10 INF) ANN •) MEW WEB ■ OP 1111111111111111 I ric,A ant I O 11ooM rale* • S INF) S Ira MEI IY403141 021e WMLm 121010•01001e7 100.00' fl OPIIVT 1.J4 ME • N■ NI Nu SE 111 LTI 1■� ■ 0 .._.. III ::: AOMECa onvon1! M MaMR. OMNI 1V4412/0 • MOUTH STE PLAN End MST FLOOR PLMI amt. yr • w 11114 : MORTM ECO FLOOR a PROOF PLAN SCALE YY • r•o• C 1 1 111 an Vornan Saw EZ 1 1 1 1 11 90 POOT rerWR LINT UM PA/WM' ur DOOR STUCCO ROOF Me ..'"•1991 0,4•09 _J t•4 of1 Eas2 Ewa= ?Aria** SielflASEb Nxikaf ! 5119J0NRE! 1 A0.9.4194T ! 91911011119M1 I PALM DRIVE - - - - - - - - - PO POOT 14S9HT LIPOT Lift PARAPET STUCCO 1199405A AVI94r ---------- — — Hath lasvetbut BrY0t0 •RADE L \15.990114 1114511•R•09 O POOT MORT LIIIT ROOP IA! 119R)405... AY9Kr SCREEN BEYOND \10291849 dRR178 South lalevatton Wast Elevation EXTEVOIR ELEVATOOMS RNA 0P-Nt SGALZa 1/8. • NO. 0 4 6 r rr. To Whom it may concern, RECEIVED APR - 4 1996 CITY MGR. OFFICE I am writing in regards to the building at 844 Hermosa Ave. I have recently moved into an apartment at 841 Manhattan Ave., and my unit is in the back with the alley right outside my windows. On the other side of this narrow alley is the building where this restaurant is supposed to be. I am very concerned and against the proposed establishment because I believe it will make my life very difficult, and possibly others will feel the same way who also live facing Palm Ave. alley. Because the building is vacated right now, people park there who often get off work at 1 or 2 in the morning. About once per week I am awakened by them chatting outside their cars or starting up very loud engines. I don't mind, it's only once a week and I recover. On weekends, I am usually woken up by people walking from bars to their cars or homes, but this too I understand. What I am very worried about is the constant noise and traffic that will surely result if this restaurant/bar/live entertainment establishment is allowed to be in this building. This alley seems to attract noise --I can often hear music from Fat Face Restaurant across the street, and if music is playing right behind me, I am sure I will have sleepless nights every night. I go to bed at 1 Opm and get up at 6am to go to work to put myself through school. I need my sleep to work and study. The doors of this building open at the side of the building, so it's unlikely that the noise will drift off to Hermosa Ave. I think it will echo off the wall and into the alley and keep people up until the place closes. I also think there will be people coming and going through the alley at all hours every night if this place is successful, which I hope it is, but not so near a residential area. I am imploring you, please help keep this section of Hermosa Beach a pleasant one in which to live. I love my apartment and I love this city. I strongly think this building would be more appropriately suited for businesses that operate during the day and evening hours. Thank you very much for your time and consideration, Lenore Christine Landavazo gy1 Ma►no'hve*g 613-1-0V0 SUPPLEMENTAL 5 ' OR MATO Ai-e7d W-2 0P4)6 0.44 ee__) 96-58113( cu -P) April 3, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1996 SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANTS: APPELLANT: APPEALS OF : PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 95-9 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-19 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE PROJECT DEVELOPER: JIM LAPOINT 2501 SEPULVEDA #1 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 RESTAURANT OWNERS: JACK WILLIAMS AND MIKE LUDWIG 2010 MONTEREY BOULEVARD HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 JIM LISSNER, ET AL 2715 EL OESTE DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, 90254 PROJECTS: 1. THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW MULTI -USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING, WITH OFFICE, RETAIL, AND RESTAURANT USES ABOVE A TWO-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE 2. A RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE BEER AND WINE; OUTSIDE SEATING; AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT Recommendations To sustain the Planning Commission's approval of the requested Precise Development Plan, subject to conditions, by adopting the attached resolution. To sustain the Planning Commission's approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions, by adopting the attached resolution. Background At their meeting of February 20, 1996, the Planning Commission approved the subject requests by a vote of 5:0. The projects were approved subject to standard and typical conditions of approval for Precise Development Plans and On -Sale Alcohol Establishments, and the following project specific conditions recommended by staff • Reconfiguration of driveway access on Manhattan Avenue, by eliminating one driveway to minimize pedestrian and auto conflicts. • Provision of parking for the physically handicapped. • Additional architectural details and/or landscaping on south and west building faces. • A 6 -foot high partition around the perimeter of outside seating areas and limited hours on outside dining to attenuate noise. The Planning Commission added the following conditions: • That a parking attendant be on duty from 6:00 P.M. until closing to provide security and facilitate project parking and circulation. • Specifically limiting outside dining hours to no later than 11:00 P.M. on the lower patio, and 10:00 P.M. on the upper patio to attenuate noise. PROJECT INFORMATION: ZONING: C-2, Restricted Commercial GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial LOT SIZE: 17,000 Square Feet INDOOR HABITABLE FLOOR AREA: 15,285 Square Feet FLOOR AREA OF RESTAURANT: 6325 Square Feet PROPOSED OUTSIDE SEATING AREA: 2115 Square Feet PARKING REQUIRED: 79 PARKING PROVIDED: 83 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Mitigated Negative Declaration The only environmental issue found to be potentially significant was the noise from the outside dining and the live entertainment. These are to mitigated to less than significant levels by acoustic 2 sound -proofing of the windows of the building; and by requiring the doors and windows to remain closed during entertainment performances; and limiting hours on the outside dining. For further background, including the initial study for the environmental assessment and the traffic study, please refer to the attachments. Analysis PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The project involves the construction of four levels, two stories of commercial space above two levels of semi -subterranean parking. The building will include 8,960 square feet of office space, divided into 6 office suites, and the proposed restaurant and outside seating areas. The project is designed to exhibit a two-story appearance on Manhattan Avenue, with the two- level parking structure hidden below. This is accomplished by taking advantage of the existing topography of the site, which steps and slopes significantly downward from Manhattan Avenue. In order to maximize the parking, the upper parking level will be accessed from Manhattan Avenue,. and the lower level from Palm Drive. For the analysis of the project and conditions of approval, and the issues which were discussed by the Planning Commission, please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report and minutes. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The proposed restaurant, "Ein Stein's", is described as a restaurant and brewery and includes a small gift shop. The Conditional Use Permit is for on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant which includes on-site brewing for on premises consumption. The floor plan shows a small additional amount of space for retail sales of novelty items, and incidental sales of beer as a novelty or gift item which would not require an off -sale conditional use permit. (If the gift shop operation changed substantially the C.U.P. may need to be amended to permit off -sale alcohol). The restaurant use is appropriate for this location, and works well in this mixed use setting which allows the entire parking facility to be available to the restaurant at night and allows some shared parking during the day as customers of the restaurant may be the office workers. Also the project is designed such that the offices will serve to buffer the restaurant from the residential neighborhoods to the north and northeast. Standard conditions of approval for the C.U.P. for on -sale beer and wine and standard hours of operation and hours for entertainment for downtown area establishments. Also, conditions are included for the purpose of mitigating noise from the outside dining area, to prohibit amplified music, and to limit outside seating hours to no later than 10:00 P.M. on the upper patio and 11:00 3 P.M. on the lower patio. This limitation is similar, although less restrictive than other C.U.P.'s for outdoor seating close to residential uses (Fat Face Fenner's, Martha's, El Gringo) which require ,closure at 9:00 P.M. The difference with this location is that the adjacent residential uses are apartments mixed with commercial uses, and not residentially zoned. The Planning Commission felt that due to proximity to adjacent residentially zoned uses and the design of the project that outside dining hours should be restricted differently for the upper and lower level patios. The lower patio is well buffered by the proposed building from residentially zoned properties north of 14th Street and east of Manhattan Avenue, whereas noise from the upper patio could impact these residential uses more directly. CONCUR: Sol Blumenfgld, irector Community Development Department Stephen R. B 1f 11 City Manager Attachments 1. Resolutions to sustain the Commission's decisions. 2. Appeal request 3. Appeal Correspondence 4. P.C. Resolutions and Minutes 2/20/96 5. P.C. staff report with attachments KRc:\pc\sr1301 4 n ' •obertson Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 " 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER AND WINE, OUTSIDE DINING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 16, 17, AND 23, TRACT NO. 1125, AND LOTS 18&19, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACHTHE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 9, 1996, to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve the subject Conditional Use Permit and to consider oral and written testimony on the matter, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit at their meeting of February 20, 1996, and approved the request subject to conditions as contained in Planning Commission Resolution 96.-10, and; WHEREAS, after considering the decision of the Planning Commission and their record of decision, and the testimony at the public hearing, the City Council agrees with the Planning Commission, and agrees with the findings and the conditions contained within Planning Commission Resolution 96-10, which are incorporated herein by reference; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH IN P.C. RESOLUTION 96-10 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1996, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY kr\c:\cc\rs1301UP 5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY MULTI -USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING ABOVE A TWO-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 16, 17, AND 23, TRACT NO. 1125, AND LOTS 18&19, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 9, 1996, to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve the subject Precise Development Plan and to consider oral and written testimony on the matter, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Precise Development Plan at their meeting of February 20, 1996, and approved the request subject to conditions as contained in Planning Commission Resolution 96-9, and; WHEREAS, after considering the decision of the Planning Commission and their record of decision, and the testimony at the public hearing, the City Council agrees with the Planning Commission, and agrees with the findings and the conditions contained within Planning Commission Resolution 96-9, which are incorporated herein by reference; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT ME CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH IN P.C. RESOLUTION 96-9 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1996, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY Ein Stein's Restaurant and Brewery, Inc. 2010 Monterey Boulevard Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 389-8933 March 27, 1996 Councilmembers City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 RE: Appeal Request Concerning CUP for Ein Stein's Restaurant and Brewery Dear Councilmembers: This letter is in response to the appeal filed by Mr. Jim Lissner concerning the February 20 decision by the Planning Commission to grant Ein Stein's Restaurant and Brewery a Conditional Use Permit ("CUP"). We believe the claims made by Mr. Lissner to support his appeal are misleading and baseless. Below you will find: (1) our response to each of the key issues raised by Mr. Lissner; and, (2) our opinion of a letter which was recently distributed to Hermosa Beach residents calling for the appeal of several recent Planning Commission decisions. 1. Issues Traffic/Parking A traffic study conducted by Korve Engineering concluded that the Manhattan Avenue Development Project, which includes Ein Steins, will not impact downtown parking. The study's recommendation that the Project's Manhattan Avenue ingress and egress be combined and moved to the north end of the Project was accepted by the Project's owner and incorporated into the latest construction drawings. Additionally, the Project has met the City's parking space requirements by including 83 covered and attendant monitored parking spaces in its design. Crime The assertion that revitalizing the downtown area has increased crime has been addressed by City officials many times and according to the Hermosa Beach Police Department is entirely unfounded. (At the Planning Commission's February meeting it was implied that Hennessey's in Huntington Beach has contributed to an increase in local crime; there is no Hennessey's in Huntington Beach.) Many communities have implemented downtown revitalization programs similar to Santa Monica's successful "Third Street Promenade," and have experienced no increase in crime. On the contrary, we believe a vital evening economy leads to a safer, more user-friendly entertainment environment. Noise Ein Stein's will occupy the northwest corner of a newly constructed, 17,000 square foot built -to - code, multi -use project. Noise inside the restaurant will be buffered by several interior and exterior walls, whereas noise on the patios will by mitigated py west, north and sopth facing walls and/or glass. The below -street -level, two-level parking lot is completely enclosed on three sides. Councilmembers City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 2. Letter to Local Residents On March 8, a letter was circulated to downtown residents which warned of the "tavernization" of Hermosa Beach. We would like to address some of statements in this letter. First, the letter mentions six CUP permits granted by the City since January 1. We are to infer from this letter that the City's decisions to approve these projects were unusual. They include: • A small convenience market is allowed to sell beer and wine. • A highly successful restaurant plans to relocate from a run-down structure that is too small to a larger, build -to -suit facility. The restaurant already has a beer and wine license. • A popular and successful restaurant seeks to expand by razing a contiguous, dilapidated building and constructing an architecturally attractive restaurant with outdoor dining. The restaurant already has a liquor license. An unsuccessful Italian restaurant with a CUP for only beer and wine is replaced by sushi restaurant with a CUP for only beer and wine. • A well established Mediterranean/Middle Eastern restaurant is granted a CUP for liquor and is allowed "play-off" its theme and offer belly -dancing. • Local businessman are granted a CUP to take a dangerous, 20 foot deep hole that has remained undeveloped for more than 20 years and build a multi -use retail, office, and restaurant site. The restaurant will offer only beer and wine. We fail to see what is unusual about these projects and believe the City acted reasonably. Second, Webster's defines a "tavern" as a "bar or saloon." Are we to infer that such recently completed and successful restaurants as the Ragin Cagin, Sabroso, and Bueno Vito, are "taverns?" Are the proposed California Beach, Hennessey's, and Ein Stein's restaurants actually "taverns," even though each is more than 5,000 square feet, requires more than $1,000,000 in risk capital to build, and offers sit down dining and a full menu? Perhaps to whoever wrote the letter a tavern is any establishment that offers beer and wine. If this is true are existing restaurants such as The Spot, I1 Boccacio, and the Backburner "taverns?" Would the writer object to a California Pizza Kitchen, a Planet Hollywood, or even a Chuckie Cheese? Third, it is an accepted fact that it is nearly impossible to operate a large, sit-down restaurant profitably without the ability to at least serve beer and/or wine. According to Montgomery. Securities 1995 restaurant industry review, nearly every successful restaurant chain offers beer and wine. The fact of the matter is many Americans enjoy beer or wine with their meals. The writer may be happy to know, however, that beer and wine consumption in the United States is actually dropping as people drink less but better quality, hand-crafted beers and premium wines. We strongly support the City's efforts to upgrade the downtown area and build a favorable, business -friendly environment, and believe that the overwhelming majority of Hermosa Beach merchants and residents are pleased with the results of your efforts and look forward to continued change and progress. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to respond to the recently filed appeal. Respectfully submitted, 111 0.41.411._._ I Mike Lud'g 2 Jack E. Williams III 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 wq 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 96-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY MULTI -USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING ABOVE A TWO-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 16, 17, AND 23, TRACT NO. 1125, AND LOTS 18&19, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 20, 1996, to receive oral and written testimony regarding the subject project and made the following findings: A. The applicants are proposing to construct a two-story multi -use commercial building above two -levels of parking, with restaurant, retail and office space; B. The project is consistent with applicable general and specific plans, and is in compliance with the use and development requirements of the zoning ordinance ; C. The site is zoned C-2 Restricted Commercial and is located in the downtown district of the City, and is thus suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed development; D. The project exhibits the appropriate scale, and a quality of design and construction materials, which will make it compatible with surrounding commercial development E. The parking required for this development is 65% of the parking requirement for the proposed uses since it is located within the Downtown Enhancement District (DED), and pursuant to Section 1152.5 of the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to the Certified Coastal Land Use Plan, the reduction to 65% is supported by the following findings: 1. Fewer than 96,250 square feet of commercial development, including new buildings, expansions, and/or intensification of uses in the DED has received a Coastal Development Permit since November 1, 1994. 2. There is currently adequate parking to support the development and to provide adequate beach parking. 3. A parking study recently completed for the downtown show the occupancy of the parking spaces in the downtown is 90% or less during daylight hours on summer 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 weekends, and no more than 24,063 square feet of commercial development has occurred since the study. F. Compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting from the issuance of the precise development plan G. The Planning Commission concurs with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their environmental assessment/initial study, that this project with the mitigating conditions included in this resolution will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY APPROVE A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY MULTI- USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING ABOVE A TWO-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SECTION I 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of February 20, 1996. Modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. The businesses and tenants shall participate in the City's downtown parking validation program, providing validations for parking in public lots for no less than two hours. 3. A parking attendant shall be on duty on the premises from 6:00 P.M. until closing. 4. Architectural treatment shall be as shown on building elevations of submitted plans and any modification shall require approval by the Community Development Director. a. Any roof -top equipment shall be integrated into the architecture and be hidden from street view. 5. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department. 6. Final building plans/construction drawings including site, elevation, floor plan, sections, details, landscaping and irrigation, submitted for building permit issuance shall be reviewed for consistency with the plans approved by the Planning Commission and the conditions of !o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 this resolution, and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. a. The one-way driveway entrance or exit onto Manhattan Avenue located directly in front of the traffic island at the Pier Avenue/Manhattan Avenue intersection shall be eliminated, and a two-way entrance/exit shall be provided at the north end of the site. b. Parking shall be provided for the physically handicapped in the amount and size as required by the U.B.C. c. Additional architectural details and relief shall be provided along the south, north, and west building elevations, and/or the use of landscaping along the westerly edges of the, parking structure, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. d. Bicycle racks shall be provided in an amount and in locations to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 7 All exterior lights shall be located and oriented in a manner to insure that neighboring residential property and public right-of-way shall not be adversely effected 8. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code SECTION II This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Precise Development Plan shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid an enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to /1 cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions VOTE: AYES: Comms.D ettelb ach,DiMonda,Merl,Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 96-9 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regulrrt eting of February ?,9, 1996. r7 Peter Tucker, Chainnian 3- /9-9y Date KR\h:\pc\RS 13 01 /D - Sol Blumenfe ., S cretary 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 96-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER AND WINE, OUTSIDE DINING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 16, 17, AND 23, TRACT NO. 1125, AND LOTS 18&19, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 20, 1996, to receive oral and written testimony regarding the subject project and made the following findings: A. The applicants are proposing to operate a restaurant and brewpub with on -sale beer and wine, outside dining, and live entertainment in a portion of a new commercial building; B. Adequate off-street parking is provided within the development, and supplemented by downtown public parking to support the proposed use, pursuant the approval of the Precise Development Plan for the construction of the building; B. The proposed use of a portion of the new building site for a restaurant with on -sale beer and wine is appropriate for the subject location and will be compatible with surrounding commercial activities within the development and in the downtown district; C. Strict compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting from the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit. D. The Planning Commission concurs with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their environmental assessment/initial study, that this project with the mitigating conditions included in this resolution will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY. APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER AND WINE, OUTSIDE DINING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: /3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26. 27 28 29 SECTION I Specific Conditions of Approval 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans. Modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. The business shall participate in the City's downtown parking validation program, providing validations for parking in public lots for no less than two hours. 3. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00 AM. and 2:00 AM. Daily. Outside dining or seating shall not be allowed later than 11:00 P.M.on the lower patio, or later than 10:00 P.M. on the upper patio. No new customers shall be seated on the patios beginning an hour before the these times. 4. A minimum 6 -foot high partition (glass or other material approved by the Community Development Director) shall be installed around the perimeter of the outdoor seating areas 5. The building shall be equipped with acoustic features to maximize sound proofing which shall include the use of double -pane windows or an equivalent, and the installation of air conditioning so that windows and doors can remain closed during performances. Any additional acoustic treatment shall be provided in the interior if necessary to comply with City's noise ordinance 6. The hours for live entertainment shall be limited to the hours between 4:00 P.M. to 1:15 A.M. Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 A.M. to 1:15 A.M. on Saturday, Sundays, and Federal and State Holidays, Cinco De Mayo, and St. Patrick's day. 7. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the city's noise ordinance and shall not create a nuisance to surrounding residential neighborhoods, and/or commercial establishments. Noise emanating from the property shall be monitored to verify compliance with the noise ordinance in response to any complaints. 8. Management shall be responsible for the music/entertainment volume levels. 9. During the performance of amplified live entertainment, the exterior doors and windows shall remain closed. SECTION II General operating and standard conditions: 1. The establishment shall not adversely effect the welfare of the residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 2. The business shall prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business, or in the immediate area. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may, subject to the review of the Planning Commission, direct the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel to eliminate the problem. If the problem persists the Police Chief then shall submit a report to the Planning Commission, which will automatically initiate a review of this Conditional Use Permit by the Commission. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and maintained free of graffiti at all times. Any changes to the interior layout which alter the primary function of the restaurant shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code SECTION III This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid an enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. /5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions VOTE: AYES: Comms.Dettelbach,DiMonda,Merl,Perrotti,Chmn.Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None AB SENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 96-10 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regxit meetiF ;. ruary 20, 1996. Peter Tucker, Chairman 3-19-9<# Date KR\h:\pc\RS 1301 BACKGROUND MATERIAL obert Catalano, 323 Ardmore Ave., asked what would be on the north border. He question was ans -red by the Commission. Mr. Catalano questioned the ownership of a four -feet gap area n to his pro • : , expressing concern the applicant would utilize this land. It was explained tha f there was not de a title to the property, the project could not move forward. The owner has i e cated clear title to the land a . previous meeting. REBUTTAL • Ben Agarwal, applicant, said the operty presented has a clear title. No one wished to speak relating to this ite and Chmn. Tucker ► osed the Public Hearing at 7:25 p.m. Comm. Perrotti suggested the addition of an Ite provide clear title shown by a title report prior Dettelbach, Di Monda and Merl agreed the applic MOTION by Comm. Merl, Seconded b the addition of the condition requirin report prior to the issuance of a bu D • the Resolution requiring the applicant to e issuance of a building permit. Comms. t had as. essed the requested changes. omm. Perrotti, to APP e applicant to provide to Sta ing permit. VE CON 95-5/PDP 95-7 with ear title as shown by a title AYES: Comms. D • elbach, Di Monda, Merl, Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: No ABSTAIN: IAF • ne 9. PDP 95-9 -- PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 17,500 SQUARE FOOT MIXED OFFICE AND RESTAURANT BUILDING ABOVE A TWO- LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE. and 10. CUP 95-19 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER AND WINE (BREWPUB), OUTSIDE SEATING, AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Staff requested that items 9 and 10 be considered concurrently. Director Blumenfeld described the site, noted that staff assessed potential environmental impacts of the project and requested that the developer provide a traffic study. He presented the background, noting the project conformed to all development standards and detailed Staffs recommendations relative to parking provisions and recommended architectural treatment. He reviewed the staff concerns of P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 "7 backing onto Palm Drive, a public alley, and the applicants desire to leave the parking as configured on the plans. Relative to the conditional use permits application, staff recommended restaurant closure at 10:00 p.m. and indicated that the project was consistent with zoning provisions and was commensurate with the downtown revitalization program. He also discussed trash enclosures, proposed parking provisions and methods of slowing traffic with Commissioners, to offset backing onto Palm Drive and reconfiguration of the driveways to the project on Manhattan Avenue. Churn. Tucker opened the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m. Manuel George, 4504 Del Amo, Torrance, applicant's representative, said stairs and water fountains is located at the front of the building, stating the restaurant also has a distinct entry. Various driveway designs has been reviewed, but this particular design is the best "of all worlds, although not the perfect solution". Mr. George discussed proposed traffic egress, ingress and parking. Comm. Di Monda felt the opening closest to Pier Avenue would be a problem. Comm. Perrotti felt the south -side entrance would be a difficult access coming from the south. Mr. George said this difficulty was being addressed in the plans. Director Blumenfeld said Staffs recommendation to consolidate the driveways would eliminate the problem. Jack Williams, 506 24th St., project architect for Einstein's, responding to the Commission's question about odor, said an odor suppressant could be installed. He explained grain delivery would be down Palm once every three months. Mash is contracted with a feed company. Entertainment would be only on special occasions, with no admission being charged. He requested a CUP amendment, asking that patio use be extended to 12 p.m. at the lower patio and until 11:00 p.m. at the upper patio for patrons. Chmn. Tucker commented people lived nearby the patio area, expressing concern regarding noise impacting those people. Sheila Donahue -Miller, 77 17th Street, said the entire building should be considered in the negative impact. She said a patio would create an "echo" effect, objected to tandem parking and exiting on Palm Drive. John Murray, 1424 Manhattan Avenue, encouraged someone to do something with the "eye sore" that has been there, but expressed concern regarding noise and parking problems, requesting additional study by Staff He felt the homeowners in his Association would be impacted and the City was going away from "family orientation". Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, said four alcohol applications were on tonight's agenda, noting he wished his general comments addressed this and the other applications. He objected to the presence on Comm. Dettelbach, said consideration was to be given to the impacts of vacant lots and buildings upon view, crime, traffic, public services, with mitigation being given to any significant impact. He said the City can't or won't enforce' Conditions and has a crime problem with a high concentration in the downtown area. He presented his crime analysis to the Commission, referencing a parallel between Hermosa Beach and Huntington Beach. He objected to Staffs statements regarding the roof plan, questioned the mitigation measures and felt the project would result in a cumulative impact on the Police, public services and residents. P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 Val Straser, Hermosa Beach Police Chief, responding to Chmn. Tucker's request, said during the past 21 years, there has been a great change in the City. He provided a "snap -shot picture" of trends during the past five years, including the number of type of crimes reported to the Police, and the false picture produced by statistics, alone. He said he had included meaningful statistics in the last two pages of the report; drunk drivers arrest and intoxication. He said demographics played a part in the reports, noted that six years ago, the downtown area appeared to be a blighted community. The attempt to revitalize the downtown area will provide a financial base to help the City survive. He explained the nature and location of various crimes, noting that many crimes occurring outside an establishment might not be related. He said the thumbnail sketch displayed an actual decrease in crime. A downtown study for 1995 is currently being conducted. No increase in staffing has been done, but redeployment of personal has been accomplished. Jim Lissner, stating he was making a point of order, said the City Department had introduced new material not in the meeting packet, which he wished to address. He said murders, rapes and assaults were up. He questioned the basis information used in the Police report. He said assaults were "up" and felt drunk driving arrests were down because of less police time spent monitoring drivers. Jim Murray, stating he was making a point of order, said he appreciated the great job the Police Dept. was doing, but said he objected to the manner in which Chmn. Tucker had identified audience participants who had expressed concerns. Comm. Dettelbach responded there have been several meetings where issues have come up concerning downtown establishments, including various claims concerning crime and problem statistics. The Chief was here to address those statistics at the Commission's request. Comm. Dettelbach said no offense had been intended. Rebuttal Jack Williams, applicant's representative, referencing the stated possible noise issuing from the patio, said the patios are above the restaurants, will have a 15' wall to the north. He felt the design would dampen the noise in the alley. Jim LaPoint, 145 Pier Avenue, said he felt good about what was going on in the City during the past 23 years. The parking will have nine spaces out of a total of 85 spaces backing out onto Palm Avenue. On the next block 47 parking lots back out onto Palm Drive, with no problem. The building will be a great visual improvement. The best method to deal with crime is to encourage more upscale development to cause value increase and citizens to be more willing to improve individual properties, benefiting the City as a whole. No one else wished to speak, and Chmn. Tucker closed the Public Hearing at 8:31 p.m. Comm. Perrotti thanked the Police Chief for the report and his appearance at this meeting. He discussed the upgrading and improvements during the past years, noting he was glad the property was being developed. He did not approve an increase in hours of business for the patio area. Comm. Merl objected to tandem parking as ineffective, noting he would consider an extension of hours on the patio only to 11:00 p.m. Comm. Dettelbach said he shared concerns regarding tandem parking. Noting he was a proponent of growth and downtown recovery, he felt this project fit into that mode, having only P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 19 one negative comment regarding the exterior appearance of a "California Stucco" in a town of quaint, different architectural structures. He asked that this be considered by the owners/developers, to which Comms. Di Monda and Merl stated agreement. Comm. Di Monda said he agreed with the Commissioners' statements, noting concern regarding parking and truck deliveries, which he discussed with Director Blumenfeld. Comm. Di Monda felt a compromise might be worked out relating to the extended service hours on the patios. Chmn. Tucker supported this mixed-use project, expressed concern regarding parking and suggested a parking attendant be on duty, especially at night, to promote a feeling of security. MOTION by Comm. Merl, Seconded by Comm. Dettelbach, to APPROVE this application with the recommended Conditions with reaffirmation that the Manhattan egress/ingress openings be at the northern end, addition of a Condition requiring an attendant during evening hours starting at 6:00 p.m. until closing, a six-foot glass partition to separate the balcony shall be required, the upper balcony hours of operation shall end at 10:00 p.m. and the lower balcony hours shall end at 11:00 p.m. No one can be seated on the lower patio after 10:00 p.m. AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Merl, Perrotti, Churn. Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Churn. Tucker stated these decisions could be appealed to the City Council within 10 days from this date. A break was taken from 8:53 to 9:07 p.m. Chmn. Tucker reconvened the meeting with all Commissioners present. CUP 95-18/PARK 95-5 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT PA NG PLAN TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN RESTA T/TAVERN, WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHO ENTERTAI MT, INTO THE ADJACENT EXISTING RES AND THE ADDrT N OF A 600 SQUARE FOOT ROOF . ATING AREA, AND ADOPTION OF AN E 1 RONMENTAL NEGATIVE e ECLARATION AT 8 PIER AVENUE, HENNESSEY'S TING AND LIVE T SPACE, Staff Recommended Action: To approve s equest. Director Blumenfeld said the applicant ...osed to expand an - ' ting bar and restaurant, not adding any additional square footage exce. 10 sq. ft. of seating on a roof • - A parking plan amendment was required and the proje would also be processed through the o.•..1 Commission. The Commission's expresse • oncerns were discussed with the applicant, who felt a. - . to separation by columns was pl. • - 4 The issues of emergency egress/ingress have been addressed in • e plans, the bar area rel. e ed correctly. The applicant has agreed to install a five-foot enclosure be pro ' • ed to mitigate e ambient noise level on the outside roof deck, which is to have a 10:00 p.m. closure ti e, P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 a -D February 13, 1996 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 20, 1996 SUBJECT: PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 95-9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-19 LOCATION: 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE APPLICANTS: PROJECT DEVELOPER: JIM LAPOINT 2501 SEPULVEDA #1 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 RESTAURANT OWNERS: JACK WILLIAMS AND MIKE LUDWIG 2010 MONTEREY BOULEVARD HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUESTS: 1. THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW MULTI -USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING, WITH OFFICE, RETAIL, AND RESTAURANT USES ABOVE A TWO-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE 2. A RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE BEER AND WINE; OUTSIDE SEATING; AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT Recommendations To approve the requested Precise Development Plan subject to the conditions as contained in the attached resolution. To approve the requested Conditional Use Permit subject to the conditions as contained in the attached resolution Background PROJECT INFORMATION: ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: C-2, Restricted Commercial General Commercial 9 10 LOT SIZE: 17,000 Square Feet INDOOR HABITABLE FLOOR AREA: 15,285 Square Feet FLOOR AREA OF RESTAURANT: 6325 Square Feet PROPOSED OUTSIDE SEATING AREA: 2115 Square Feet PARKING REQUIRED: 79 PARKING PROVIDED: 83 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Recommended Mitigated Negative Declaration The site is located on the west side of Manhattan Avenue one parcel south of Pier Avenue and is surrounded on all sides by the same C-2 zoning and predominantly commercial uses. Nonconforming residential uses are located on adjacent property to the north and south. The site is currently undeveloped and mostly unimproved, with an old building's foundation, retaining walls, and parking area still in place. The site contains substantial grade variations sloping to west and south west with a 15 -foot difference in elevation. The natural slope has already been modified by previous development. Currently the northern three-quarters of the site, where the foundation remains, is fairly flat at the level of Palm Drive with a stepped retaining wall below the grade of Manhattan Avenue. The southerly portion contains surface level parking on a fairly steep slope which can be accessed from either Manhattan Avenue or Palm Drive. The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of January 18, 1996 considered the environmental impacts of the project, and based on the initial study check -list (attached), and testimony at the meeting, found that the only possible significant impact was the potential noise from live entertainment and outside seating. The Committee recommended a mitigated Environmental Negative Declaration. The recommended mitigation for noise included the use of double -pane windows for the restaurant, and limiting nighttime hours for outside dining to no later than 10:00 P.M. The finding that traffic impacts are less than significant was based on a traffic study submitted by the applicant which measures impacts on nearby intersections at the P.M. peak hour. The finding relative to traffic impacts is contingent upon final review of the traffic analysis by the City's traffic engineer. Analysis PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The project involves the construction of four levels, two stories of commercial space above two levels of semi -subterranean parking. The building will include 8,960 square feet of office space, divided into 6 office suites, and the proposed restaurant and outside seating areas. 2Z The project is designed to exhibit a two-story appearance on Manhattan Avenue, with the two- level parking structure hidden below. This is accomplished by taking advantage of the existing topography of the site, which steps and slopes significantly downward from Manhattan Avenue. In order to maximize the parking, the upper parking level will be accessed from Manhattan Avenue, and the lower level from Palm Drive. The project conforms with the basic zoning requirements of the C-2 zone with respect to parking and building height, as follows: Off-street parking is provided to exceed the total requirement of 79 spaces based on the cumulative requirement of all the proposed uses of the building. The restaurant including outside dining results in a requirement of 55 spaces (8440 Sq. Ft. Gross Floor Area of restaurant at one space per 100 Sq. Ft. X 65%) and the office space results in a requirement of 24 spaces (8,960 square feet, at 1 per 250 sq. Ft. X 65%). Under the City's zoning code and Coastal Land Use Plan, the reduction to 65% is allowed in the downtown for all projects regardless of size. The conditions of the reduction, however, require that all businesses participate in the parking validation program, and that bicycle parking be provided. Also, parking for the physically handicapped must be provided. The building is designed to fit within the 30 foot height limit as measured from the existing grade (using the four comer points). This is accomplished by stepping the building downward to the west to follow the natural slope. Beyond the basic zoning standards, the purpose of Precise Development Plan pursuant to Section 1431 of the Zoning Ordinance is to review the overall project design and layout. Staff has the following comments with respect to design and circulation: The applicant's traffic study recommends combining the separate Manhattan Avenue driveways at the north end to improve access to the site. It would also minimize the conflict between pedestrian and auto circulation, and eliminate the conflict with the traffic island located at the proposed south entry. The southerly one-way access (whether its ingress or egress) is awkward and inconvenient because of the traffic island, forcing vehicles to circle around the block. Simply reversing the entry and exit will not eliminate the conflict and inconvenience. Staff is including a condition of approval to make this recommended modification. The lower level portion of the parking structure is offset from Manhattan Avenue to allow use of existing shoring and retaining walls, and to minimize the costs for new shoring and retaining walls. This offset does not allow for the maximum garage area at this level. The owner, however, has prepared preliminary cost estimates and the removal and re -shoring to eliminate this offset would cost $240,000. ;3 The parking layout for the lower level reflects the choice noted above, and shows the applicant's preference for stalls which use the alley as their turning aisle. Staff had previously recommended reconfiguring the parking as tandem parking with internal access, requiring the use of a parking attendant to ensure full use of the stalls. The owner is opposed to use of a parking attendant. The parking levels do not have internal access between floors, requiring users to access the second level from Manhattan Avenue and first from Palm Drive. The divided access may be less convenient to users, however, a ramp between floors would consume too much parking to justify it's construction. Also, from a traffic impact perspective, the divided garage entry will help spread the distribution of trips rather than concentrating them on either Palm Drive or Manhattan Avenue. The building will be only two -stories on its main entry and most visible elevation on Manhattan Avenue. The design successfully hides the bulk and mass of the parking structure. This results in an appropriate scale and appearance to fit in with the scale and character of downtown and other nearby buildings. All of the building's architectural elements and enhancements, which exhibit Mediterranean themes, are apparent at this elevation, which includes clay mission tile roofing, a colonnade and courtyard, fountains, landscaping, and an entry feature into the restaurant. The north and south elevations lack design detail in comparison with the front elevation, although these will be of limited visibility because of the adjacent buildings. The west elevation, which will be visible from Palm Drive, is provided with little relief to break the mass of the two level parking structure. All three of these elevations could be enhance with architectural treatment, and/or landscaping which could include some climbing vines or planter boxes. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The proposed restaurant, "Ein Stein's", is described as a restaurant and brewery and includes a small gift shop. The restaurant's floor plan and description is included as a separate enclosure from the project plans. The Conditional Use Permit is for on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant which includes on-site brewing for on premises consumption. The floor plan shows a small additional amount of space for retail sales of novelty items, and incidental sales of beer as a novelty or gift item which would not require an off -sale conditional use permit. (If off - sale of beer increased substantially and occurred past 11:30 P.M. the C.U.P. would need to be amended). The restaurant use is appropriate for this location, and works well in this mixed use setting which allows the entire parking facility to be available to the restaurant at night and allows some shared parking during the day as customers of the restaurant may be the office workers. Also the project is designed such that the offices will serve to buffer the restaurant from the residential neighborhoods to the north and northeast. Staff has incorporated standard conditions of approval for the C.U.P. for on -sale beer and wine and standard hours of operation and hours for entertainment for downtown area establishments. Also, conditions are included for the purpose of mitigating noise from the outside dining area, to prohibit amplified music, and to limit outside seating hours to no later than 10:00 P.M.. This limitation is similar with other C.U.P.'s for outdoor seating close to residential uses (Fat Face Fenner's, Martha's, El Gringo) which require closure at 9:00 P.M. The difference with this location is that the adjacent residential uses are apartments mixed with commercial uses, and not residentially zoned. This may be grounds for considering even longer outside hours, especially for the lower level patio which is not as open as the upper patios. The lower' patio is also well buffered by the proposed building from residentially zoned properties north of 14th Street and east of Manhattan Avenue. Michael Schubach Planning Director o lume Community Id, 'rector evelopment Department Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution P.D.P. 2. Proposed Resolution C.U.P. 3. Location Map 4. Photos 5. Cost Estimate 6. Traffic Study, Traffic Engineer comments 7. Negative Declaration & Initial Study 8. Application 9. Correspondence Ken Robertson Associate Planner 2S KRc:\pc\sr1301 253=5 4-2 /449 X409 CONDOMINIUM PARCEL MAP CONDOMINIUM PARCEL. MAP CONDOMINIUM PARCEL MAP 1.4 14 P- M. o3 b /z ) r) 9 1/4 q33 .03 0 t /00 /33z 3/k-0 a P.) ;l tc.. 1vC`.i; /%--r`(,t N. 4-t «co 7,95 F, M. /0824 13TH ST. /-'/1w ._ AVE.o 13TH CT, ADDRESS: \ 301 11 DATE: Vv mr F f,A p t t_721 M Vi Eize PA L n 0 PROPOSAL W.R. Rails 1226 10th Street Manhattan Beach, CA 90266-6022 (310) 376 9874 Proposal Submitted To: Name: Planning Department, City of Hermosa Beach Street: City: Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 State: CA Phone: (310) 372 3068 Work To Be Performed At: f'301 Manhattan Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA We hereby propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of: 1. Removal of existing concrete foundation and wa11.80' long x 8' high and 6' wide x 80'. 2. Shoring 3. Engineering 4. New walls 170' long Approx 16' tall. 5. Grading & Excavation. The cost of the above work is $240,000. All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the descriptions above and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Two Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars ($240,000) with payment made as follows: Upon completion of job Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado, and other necessary insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by W R RALLS Date 1/20/96 Signature Respectfully submitted by W R RALLS Note - This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted stithin 30 days. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date G 0 Zq Signature Signature f1 II, 8: -=;iii: 'TS TFJi_ 714 964 7219 TO: Amy Amirani/Jae Mankawich February 17,1996 FROM: Ed Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: KORVE ENG. Traffic Impact Study 1301 Manhattan Ave. I have reviewed the subject study dated January 16,1996. I have the following comments: i agree with the Korve tindings relative to the vehiclular trip generation, distribution and assignment. I also agree with their recommendations for a singular driveway on Manhattan Avenue. The IN driveway is too close to the island at Pier/Manhattan and would be difficult for large vehicles to enter. It also is very close to the intersection and if any backup from the project parking area occurs it will clog up the City street approach on Manhattan Avenue. I further agree that the eleven parking stalls that back onto Palm Drive are not desirable and should be restructured or eliminated. If the project does not have the proper number of spaces with these eliminated then the project should be re -worked or scrapped. We do not need to introduce nor approve operational problems of backups onto this narrow alley type facility. Even the two spaces onto palm Drive are not desirable. Lastly, are we not asking for Palm Drive improvements? The property to the west if I recall is vacant and has potential for acess also onto palm. This narrow stret cannot take too much traffic in its present width. 3o fa2t1996 p�NN1NG WI. SUPPLEMENT_4L INFORMATION 910 Mk.Korve 1 Engineering January 16, 1996 Mr. Riley Rails R.L. Rant Properties 1226 Tenth Street Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 RE: Manhattan Avenue Commercial Development Project No. 296001x0 Korve Engineering, Inc. (KORVE) is pleased to present the following letter report documenting the methods and findings of a traffic impact analysis for a proposed development at 1301 Manhattan Avenue in Hermosa Beach. Please call us at (213) 486-6533 if there are any questions or comments. 1. Introduction and Project Description The proposed project is a multi-level commercial mixed-use development. It will contain a 4,325 square foot restaurant and brewery, a 400 square foot retail gift shop, and 10,500 square feet of office space. It is expected to be constructed within one year (1997). The project address is 1301 Manhattan Avenue in Hermosa Beach, which lies just north of Pier Avenue. The site is currently vacant. The project location is shown in Figure 1. The project will provide a two-level parking garage below two levels of rentable space. The lower parking level will contain 45 parking spaces and will provide separate in and out access points on Palm Drive. The upper parking level will contain 41 parking spaces and will provide separate in and out access points on Manhattan Avenue. ____ The purpose of this analysis is to determine if this project will have a significant impact on the traffic and circulation flows in the area. 2. Existing Conditions (1996) Six intersections in the vicinity of the project site were selected for analysis in the PM peak hour. No AM peak hour analysis was conducted because the project is not expected to be generating a significant number oftrips at that time. This was confirmed as an appropriate assumption by the City Traffic Engineer. The study intersections are: 14th Street / Palm Drive 14th Street / Manhattan Avenue 14th Street / Hermosa Avenue Pier Avenue / Palm Drive Pier Avenue / Hermosa Avenue Pier Avenue / Manhattan Avenue (east) Pier Avenue / Manhattan Avenue (west) A California Corporation With offices in: Oakland 515 South Flower Street Sacramento Suite 1200 San Jose Los Angeles, CA 90071 San Bernardino 213-486-6578 Cathedral City 213-486-6533 Fax Irvine '4 Korve A Engineering The intersection of Pier Avenue / Manhattan Avenue is analyzed as two separate stop - controlled intersections due to'the configuration of the roadway. New traffic volume counts were made at each of the study intersections late in 1995 and early in 1996. A seasonal adjustment factor of 1.15 was applied to these counts to reflect the decrease in traffic that occurs in Hermosa Beach during the winter months when these counts were made. The adjustment factor is based on a series of historic counts undertaken in both the summer peak and the winter off-peak periods. The location and existing operation of each of the study intersections is shown below in Table 1 and Figure 1. Traffic conditions were evaluated in terms of level of service (LOS) at the six study intersections. This is a measure that describes traffic conditions at intersections, ranging; from LOS A for free-flow or excellent conditions to LOS F for congested conditions. LOS D is generally considered the lowest acceptable operating level for urban street systems. LOS definitions are shown in Appendix 1. The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method is used to calculate levels of service at signalized intersections. Traffic volumes are compared to roadway capacities for each approach of the intersection. Overall V/C calculation is the sum of the highest V/C of each approach to an intersection plus a clearance interval. Level of service at stop -controlled intersections is based on the average delay experienced at all of the approaches. Table 1: Intersection Levels of Service -- Existing Conditions (1996) Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Existing LOS Delay (secs) V/C Ratio 14th St. /Palm Dr. A 0.7 - 14th St./Manhattan Ave. A 1.2 - 14th St./Hemosa Ave.* A - 0.337 Pier Ave. /Palm Dr. B 0.1 - Pier Ave. /Hermosa Ave.* A - 0.371 Pier Ave. /Manhattan Ave. (east) C 1.7 - Pier Ave. /Manhattan Ave. (west B 0.5 - • Signalized Intersections. Remainder are stop -controlled. 3. Future Base Conditions (1997) The project is expected to be constructed within one year (1997). To determine its effects on traffic in the study area at that future date, it is necessary to apply an annual growth factor to the existing traffic volumes. This will account for the ambient traffic growth expected to occur in the area. The effects of any other projects which will have an impact on the study intersections (related projects) must also be considered and included in the calculation of Future Base conditions. An annual growth factor of 1 percent per year was used, as approved by City staff. A description of one cumulative project, located at 844 Hermosa Avenue, was obtained from City staff and its effects calculated. The location of this related project is shown in Figure 2. It will 2 1� Korve 1 Engineering -I�NO SCALE PM PEAK HOUR 1996 WEEKDAY Lec enc • Study Intersection Project Location Manhattan Avenue Commercial Development Traffic Study Figure 1 Existing Conditions Intersection LOS 33 1� Korve 1 Engineering Manhattan Avenue Commercial Development Traffic Study Figure 2 Location of Related Project 3'- I Korve 111111. Engineering redevelop an existing 3,600 square foot medical office into 4,400 square feet of restaurant space and 1,800 square feet of general office space. After taking a 10% passerby reduction for the restaurant area, this project will generate a net increase of 36 trips in and 30 trips out during the PM peak hour. Table 2 and Figure 3 summarize both the Existing and the Future Base conditions. It can be seen that although there are slight differences in delay or v/c ratio, the overall levels of service at each study intersection, with one exception, remain the same. The LOS at Pier Avenue/ Manhattan Avenue (west) worsens while the delay improves, an apparent anomaly, because the LOS is based on the critical turning movement, which worsens, while the delay is based on the overall volume of vehicles passing through the intersection, which improves. Table 2: Intersection Levels of Service -- Future Base Conditions (1997) Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Existing Future Base LOS Delay Ratio LOS Delay Ratiio 14th St. / Palm Dr. A 0.7 - A 0.7 - 14th St. / Manhattan Ave. A 1.2 - A 1.2 - 14th St. / Hemosa Ave. ' A - 0.337 A - 0.347 Pier Ave. / Palm Dr. B 0.1 - B 0.1 - Rer Ave. / Hermosa Ave. * A - 0.371 A - 0.398 Fier Ave. / Manhattan Ave. (east) C 1.7 - C 1.7 - Rer Ave. / Manhattan Ave. (w est) B 0.5 - C 0.4 - *Signalized intersections. Remainder are stop -controlled. 4. Future Base plus Project Conditions (1997) The effects of the project on the study intersections are identified by adding the PM peak hour trips which it would generate to the Future Base conditions traffic. This allows effects which are related only to the project to be readily identified. The trips generated by the project are shown in Table 3 below. Trip generation rates are taken from the standard reference work on this subject, Trip Generation Manual (5th Ed., 1991) by the Institute of Traffic Engineers. It is expected that this project will generate a total of 143 trips, 64 trips in and 79 trips out. Table 3: Project Trip Generation in the Weekday PM Peak Hour Land Use Buildout Size (SF) Trips In Trips Out Restaurant 6500 57 49 Specialty Retail 400 1 1 General Office 10500 6 29 Total Trips 64 79 5 35 IC Korve 1 Engineering Manhattan Avenue Commercial Development Traffic Study Figure 3 Future Base Conditions Intersection LOS 36 Korve Engineering The distribution of these trips over the local roadway system was made in a way that reflected the nature of the project, its location within the city and its access points. Vehicles coming to the project will approach northbound on Palm Drive, which is one-way, or southbound on Manhattan Avenue. The general distribution of these trips was 45% to/from the east, 25% to/from the north and 30% to/from the south, as approved by City staff. The Future Base plus Project and the Future Base LOS, V/C and delay are summarized below in Table 4. Figure 4 shows these levels of service. It can be seen that the overall level of service at each study intersection does not decline. Project traffic will cause slight increases in delay or v/c ratio at each of the study intersections with the exception of Pier Avenue at Manhattan Avenue (west). Table 4: Intersection Levels of Service -- Future Base plus Project Conditions (1997) Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Future Base Future Base + Project Project Impact LOS Delay (secs) V/C Ratio LOS Delay (secs) V/C Ratio LOS Delay (secs) V/C Ratio 14th St. / Palm Cr. A 0.7 - A 1.2 - - 0.5 - 14th St. / Manhattan Ave. A 1.2 - A 1.6 - - 0.4 - 14th St. / Pemosa Ave. ' A - 0.347 A - 0.362 - - 0.015 Rer Ave. / Palm D. B 0.1 - B 0.2 - - 0.1 - Rer Ave. / I-arrnosa Ave. * A - 0.398 A - 0.414 - - 0.16 Rer Ave. / Manhattan Ave. (east) C 1.7 - C 2.6 - - 0.9 - Rer Ave. / IVanhattan Ave. (w est) C 0.4 - C 0.4 - - 0.0 - * Signalized Intersections. Remainder are stop -controlled. 5. Access and Internal Circulation The project site is located between Manhattan Avenue and Palm Drive immediately north of Pier Avenue. Palm Drive is one-way northbound. Access to the lower parking level will be provided by two one-way driveways on Palm Drive while access to the upper parking level will be provided by two one-way driveways on Manhattan Avenue. A copy of the project plans which were supplied to KORVE are attached as Figure 5. Because Palm Drive is one-way, vehicles entering the lower level must approach from the south and depart to the north. This should not pose a problem. On Manhattan Avenue, the northern driveway is shown on the project plans as a one-way entry and the southern driveway as a one-way exit. Vehicles will be able to enter the northern driveway from either direction. The presence of a raised concrete traffic island opposite the southern driveway will force all traffic exiting the upper parking level to turn west onto Pier Avenue. It is recommended that the flow of traffic through this level be reversed torestrict the movements of entering vehicles rather than exiting vehicles. This will improve circulation around the project. This reversal was assumed in the analysis. Circulation to and from Manhattan Avenue would be further improved by combining both driveways into a single two-way driveway at the northeast corner of the building as this would provide free movement for all traffic. It is recommended that this be done, if possible. 7 37 1� Korve 1 Engineering Manhattan Avenue Commercial Development Traffic Study Figure 4 Future Plus Project Intersection LOS 38 1 Korve 1 Engineering It is not recommended that the raised concrete traffic be replaced with a smaller painted island. This was considered as a way to improve access to the southern driveway on Manhattan Avenue while maintaining two one-way driveways. This island, however, serves to direct southbound left -turning traffic and therefore should be left as it is. The project plans show eleven parking stalls on the lower level which will be accessed directly from Palm Drive, forcing drivers to back into the traffic stream. KORVE understands that this potential problem has been eliminated because these have been changed to tandem parking stalls which will be accessed from within the structure. If the two stalls at the northwest corner of the building have not been changed in this way, drivers using them will be forced to back into the traffic stream. This potential problem can be minimized by posting a warning on the wall behind them or by eliminating them. The project plans appear to provide no handicapped parking stalls. KORVE recommends that the project provide two handicapped parking stalls on each of the two parking levels. Specifically, it is recommended that the three parking stalls on the lower parking level immediately north of the elevator be replaced with two handicapped parking stalls. On the upper parking level it is recommended that the two parking stalls immediately west of the elevator be replaced with one handicapped stall and that the easternmost parking stall immediately south of the elevator be replaced with a handicapped stall. This would result in a net loss of two parking stalls but would still leave the project with more than the amount of parking required by the City (83 stalls). 6. Conclusions The 142 weekday PM peak hour trips generated by this project will have no significant impacts on the surrounding intersections. Project access to and from Manhattan Avenue would be improved if the two one-way driveways were combined into one two-way driveway at the' northeastern corner of the building. Finally, the lack of handicapped parking stalls should be addressed. 9 39 / tv. 51.1P aVv.1or YI( •8' A • A r 1 ; ' t Li Li IA\ 10x8' .e' I- TTA /J AVE. r' 1 �n 'Ail 51'AC 5 ke' ih,.y slps SCONn MN- PAJKING , N ri IQo irn r=> 1 PROXC1- OA1"A E5f FLOCK cat FLUOR rats. ‘11.%52.ff. I5'O SG.Ff. Lova L VEL PARKING PMC man r 'it a WEI.OGR Pox a acovIWOR P a 1MRIr lt:1r>r! 6525 50. Ff. 1t''ftl ki to" 747 5Q_ PC. 642 50. Ff. 726 5Q. r. 2115 50. K o9'/a a MI FLOOZ a SECC1JPI .(c for/1. I /CA a5r...GP1CFLOGI; 14,1=r4A, 50505Q. Ft 3910 59. ft. a960 52 Fr. 1620 5Q. Ff. I01'41;RLl;& OW LAUram M I t:I Maroon 1551. MFICI 1071AL WOG fra5PRC►iVW 99 SPRIG 24 5Pia 79 Tia k:1'i l00,: C. \� ,r ; i r .. �.... r A (_�^ % 1 ; 1 V 7 't ! \ ♦f �i t i . r r r—i i-� r'— r\/ t 1 �� 1 ; 1 1 f f \ f ti r'+ ; 1 r ; r RV. 949 . ^• ti r r 1 r '; ' 14.443 i% , tl A ' ; ' � f 1 A 11 't f � II 1 • r l;! '� ,1 a t, 119.9915 :14.989 ,1 i� t�' � r i , orf l 11 1t i \ 'is � S 1 r ti . 44 PM SIPS EI SPACES J. 98.8 C �)1 JA f° 1 ap/10 's 5'0"V _ ; %.1 ; •; 1 % f :�; :\ : 1 5 % !%t %,r S; 1 ' �� �;, ' t; IC tit 5 .. ' • , i ‘'.1 ANG 51�1R- t.. ;i NEW L- rNEW PROXC1- OA1"A E5f FLOCK cat FLUOR rats. ‘11.%52.ff. I5'O SG.Ff. Lova L VEL PARKING PMC man r 'it a WEI.OGR Pox a acovIWOR P a 1MRIr lt:1r>r! 6525 50. Ff. 1t''ftl ki to" 747 5Q_ PC. 642 50. Ff. 726 5Q. r. 2115 50. K o9'/a a MI FLOOZ a SECC1JPI .(c for/1. I /CA a5r...GP1CFLOGI; 14,1=r4A, 50505Q. Ft 3910 59. ft. a960 52 Fr. 1620 5Q. Ff. I01'41;RLl;& OW LAUram M I t:I Maroon 1551. MFICI 1071AL WOG fra5PRC►iVW 99 SPRIG 24 5Pia 79 Tia 5Q,rt,Pota 1#A47 MAIN I• f Cr FICt AtA nr n fA KM. ISA 19' a411115 AK A y rye. 44.41 F.wx r114,nlK,AfW11MA 13 t-1- C..4 1 'TUI , vtcna q : o" cLcj 11 `i';r tl'St fLOIOK 1t5 LAK 4'1'85 I9' GAG lA WRY •4 c nrw.n COMYfei2 el1 cam) N FW, FLK, Ai MPJN WW1: K AA HA" flk51" rWOR COMMA. V,le:424 ana OMNI f0 MON 642 50. Ff. PATO MIA u,�.aae ----T--- r'mt.-Vow-34g 71.— i,I4 r•� 126 50. rr. PA110/OA U. •1. bi.' sl' J 50/L'4l--T---1 in 1 1 2N?VLRt A L 'i 1540 52 ff.GPI fc fx/ a DeLON ' tib -- _L — ---- 1 51WM5 rte' �1c..& 960 5Q. rr. Fe.19 G .t 1125 50. ff. Q 5EC.O110Lt%4 f•l'• I1L• a 112 rt• CnNf0 eriow Lit I%o50.rr. a 55COW I1 -00K 5COtV P -O? COMWVCIAL •54.a4:1- .N orn'a i''N] Res=lit1�� Korve 1 Engineering Appendix One Level of Service Definitions 1 Korve 1 11IL. Engineering TABLE 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS Level Volume to Of Capacity Service Ratio Description of Traffic Condition A 0.00-0.60 Insignificant Delays: No approach phase is fully utilized and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. B 0.61-0.70 Minimal Delays: An occasional approach phase is fully utilized. Drivers begin to feel restricted. C 0.71-0.80 Acceptable Delays: Major approach phase may become fully utilized. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. D 0.81-0.90 Tolerable Delays: Drivers may wait through more than one red indication. Queues may develop but dissipate rapidly, without excessive delays. E 0.91-1.00 Significant Delays. Volumes approaching capacity. Vehicles may wait through several signal cycles and long queues of vehicles form upstream. F Over 1.00 Excessive Delays: Represents conditions at capacity, with extremely long delays. Queues may block upstream intersections and queues may form which do not dissipate. Sources: Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board, Special Report No. 87, Washington, D.C. 1965; Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, Transportation Research Board Circular 212, Washington, D.C., 1980; Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board Special Report no. 209, Washington, D.C., 1985; Korve Engineering, Inc. s ACTIVITY IDENTIFICATION Location a. , Address:. 1301 Manhattan Avenue b. Legal: Lots 16, 17 & 23, Tract No. 1125, and Lots 18 & 19, Block 34, 1st Addition to Hermosa Beach Description Precise Development Plan to construct a new 17,500 square foot mixed office, retail, restaurant building above a two-level parking structure and Conditional Use Permit for on -sale beer & wine (brewpub), outside seating, and live entertainment in conjunction with a restaurant. Sponsor. a. Name: 1) Jack Williams & Mike Ludwig (Conditional Use Permit) 2) Jim LaPoint (Precise Development Plan) b. Mailing Address: 1)2010 Monterey Blvd., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 2) 2501 Sepulveda #101, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Phone: 1) 310/379-8933 2) 310/546-7755 NEGATIVE DECLARATION In accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City of Hermosa Beach, which implements the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review_ Committee must make an environmental review of all private projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning Commission must make an environmental review of all public projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental Quality' Act. . This declaration is documentation of the review and, if it becomes final, no comprehensive Environmental Impact Report is required for this project. FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Community Development Department, Planning Division. Date of Finding airman: airman; Environmental Review Committee FINDING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Community Development Department, Planning. Division. 3--'1-76 Date of Finding Chairman, Planning' Commission .FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL We have undertaken and completed.an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental Impact Report because, provided the attached mitigation measures are included in the project, it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on file in the Community Development Department, Planning Division. Date of Finding Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council Proposed Mitigation Measures 1301 Manhattan Avenue 1. Double pane windows or windows with equivalent sound -proofing qualities shall be provided for the restaurant. Outside dining areas at the restaurant shall close no later than 10:00 P.M, or be provided with a minimum 6 -foot high sound barrier on all 4 sides. The hours may be extended later only upon submittal of a noise study to verify that the City's noise ordinance will be complied with. 4-% ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: P.D.P. 95-9, C.U.P. 95-19 Construction of a new two-story, 15,000 square foot mixed use commercial building over two levels of subterranean parking with 83 parking spaces. The building will contain a restaurant/brew-pub with on -sale beer and wine and live entertainment, and offices. 2. Project Location: 1301 Manhattan Avenue 3. Project Sponsor: Jim LaPoint 2501 Sepulveda #101 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 4. Lead Agency : City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 5. Contact Person: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner - (310) 318-0242 6. General Plan Designation: General Commercial 7. Zoning: C-2, Restricted Commercial 8. Description of Project: A Precise Development Plan for construction of a new two story mixed use commercial building above two levels of subterrannean parking. The building will include 8,960 square feet of office space and a 6325 square foot restaurant. Up to 2,115 square feet of outside seating will be available for the restaurant/brew pub. 83 parking spaces will be provided in the parking structure with 42 on the lower level with access from the alley, and 41 with accesss to Manhattan Avenue. A Conditional Use Permit is also being requested for beer and wine in conjunction with the restaurant, and live entertainment.. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: The subject site is located on the west side of Manhattan Avenue with one parcel separating it from Pier Avenue, the main East-West street in the commercial downtown district, which is within an urban setting. This district is already significantly built out with older buildings which typically cover almost their entire lots.. The site is surrounded on all 4 sides by C-2 zoning, and by commercial uses to the south, west and east, which consist of eating and drinking establishments, retail uses, offices and business services, and some nonconforming residential uses. Public parking lots A, B and C, are located within walking distance and public lot D is 50 feet to the north. To the north, in-between the subject site and lot D is a nonconforming 3 -unit residential building. The site is currently undeveloped, and being used for surface parking. It was previously the location for a church. The grade of the slope is fairly severe, going downward from Manhattan Avenue towards the ocean. ei-F 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Coastal Commission ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. . ❑ Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems 0 • Geological Problems 0 Energy and Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Water 0 Ha7ards ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ® Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, that there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environmental, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. VeAA (A(e t Printed Name VJ en Date ut rl� For ficAt 1 G4.0 CoNiAi EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that ari effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the mitigation measure has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from section XVII, `Early Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for pdtential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). • Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include reference to the page where the statement is substantiated. See the sample question. below. A source list should be attached; and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different ones. SAMPLE QUESTION: Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: Landslides or mudslides? (1, 6) t .(Attached source list explains that 1 is the general plan, and 6 is a topographic map. This answer would probably not need further explanation.) Potentially ` Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No • Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than' Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies ❑ adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low income or minority community)? ❑ The proposed use complies with the C-2 zoning and is consistent with the General Commercial designati General Plan H. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) - Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructures? Displace existing housing, especially affordable _ housing? The addition of a commercial use of this size and area "designated by the General Plan for this type of commercial) use will not impact any population injections or induce growth. III. GEOLOGIC,- PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to .,potential impacts involving: a) . Fault rupture? b) Seismic ground shaking? c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? SZ Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? e) Landslides or mudflows? f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? h) Expansive soil? I) Unique geologic or physical features? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ The project includes the demolition of the existing structure, and construction of a new building. These changes will be required to conform to Zoning, Building and Safety and Public Works requirements for retaining walls, soil stability, grading, drainage,which ensure that the impacts will be less than significant The site does not contain any unique soil or geologic features IV. WATER Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? g) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? :Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge . capability? Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? S3 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): h) Impacts to groundwater quality? i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact - Impact Drainage patterns, absorption rates and surface runnoff will be modified as a result of the proposed construction as compared to the current use which, while mostly a paved surface, includes some exposed soil. Past of the site was a Church with and surface parking. Overall the changes in surface water flows will be less ihan significant, and will be required to meet the. requirements of the Public Works Department for stormwater runoff V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any chance in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? (Limited new construction (see project description) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? • b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? c) ,Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative 5qF Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Rail, waterborne or air traffic- impacts? ❑ ❑ ❑ (4) A traffic study was prepared by Korve Engineering to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed combination of uses. It was found that the total impact on surround intersections would not decrease the levels of service' of these intersections, and thus the overall impact is less than significant. Parking is provided on-site in the parking structure at a ratio of 1 space per 210 square feet of gross floor area, including the outside seating area. This satisfy the city's parking requirements in the downtown for all the proposed uses combined, with a resulting excess of four spaces. (3) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees) ? c) Locally designed natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? The site is while currently vacant was previously a fully developed site in urban setting, -and contains negligible vegetation or habitats for any flora or fauna. VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful an , inefficient manner? c) Results in the loss'of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the and the - residents of the state? Based on submitted plans,' and the size and scale of projects, and given that the project will have to comply with Title 24 requirements, no impacts are anticipated SS Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or tress? No impacts are anticipated X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise -levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant. No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact o El c n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ Potential increases in noise levels, especially evenings and nights, may be anticipated from the requested live entertainment, as well as the general noise levels from the assembly of patrons inside and outside the restaurant. These noise increases would be mitigated to less than significant levels by on-site management 10 keep restaurant doors andwindows closed during evening and nightime"operating hours, and limitations on hours for the entertainment and outside dining XL PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas:, Fire protection? ❑ b) Police protection? . , ❑ c) Schools?. ❑ d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ❑ 3-6 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): e) Other governmental services? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact' The construction of this new building will marginally increase the need for all these services. This is anticipated to be less than significant, and easily handled by existing resources and facilities. These impacts are also partially mitigated by various City required fees, and taxes that will be generated from this project XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) " Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional water supplies? None of these facilities will be substanntially impacted Sewer facilities would be marginally impacted by the increase uses associated with a restaurant, including waste products from cooking (grease, etc.) that may impact the nearby sewer lines. This will be minimized by the use of grease traps within the restaurant: Stormwater volumes may marginally increase, but as noted above the site is already mostly paved, so this is not anticipated to be significant. Solid waste will be generated to marginally impact pick-up services, this is not anticipated to be significant. XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) • Create light or glare? ❑ ❑ D ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ The proposed development wil be compatible with surrounding uses, and thus the appearance is expected to be compatible. The placement of a 2 -story building at this location will partially obstruct the westerly ocian views from locations along Pier Avenue, as well as view from other nearby private locations. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially . Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The building, however, complies with the applicable30 foot height limit for the. C-2 zone, with the roof line following the westerly slope downward . XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? c) Affect historical resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? No impacts on cultural resources are anticipated XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ ❑ . ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑El ❑ ❑ ❑ .El No impacts are anticipated 'XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or .endangered plant or animal or eliminate important ,examples of the major periods �f California history or prehistory? b), Does the,project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Potentially Significant Potentially . Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated . Impact Impact Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review 1. General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach (Land Use Element revised 1994) including the General Plan Map 2. City of Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance 3. Amendments to the City's Parking Requirements for Downtown: File includes the Coastal Lan Use Plan Amendment approved by the Coastal Commission; City Council Ordinance, Mitigated Negative Declaration ; and supporting analysis 4. Traffic Analysis prepared for 1301 Manhattan. Avenue by Korve Engineers, on file in the Planning Division in the project file for -1301 Manhattan Avnue. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, rand state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. --9 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Authority: Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087. Reference: Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21082.1. 21083, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21151; Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino, 202 Cal. App. 3d 296 (1988); Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors, 222 Cal. App. 3d 1337 (1990). /c.cklisi 6 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROJECT ADDRESS vi o t.,tp� ht -TA, Project Name (If applicable) R, RA 01— LEGAL 3i LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name(s) -2-1M kA PD N i Mailing Address c,25o/ S ' 'LI//D /o/ Applicant's Relationship to Property oc.WNE ZONING Phone 3/o -S 6-77 S..r AAJ/ TTr: ) 8 eg, CA . *I have inquired about the need to obtain a Coastal Development Permit from the Coastal Commission, and understand I do ✓ do not require a permit. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE PROJECT REQUEST _ Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) (3812) C.U.P. - Condominium of Units (3812) _ C.U.P. - Amendment/Amortization (3805) C.U.P. - Minor Amendment (3899) C.U.P. - Fences & Walls (3864) Environmental Staff Review (3803) Final Map (3 810) General Plan Amendment/Zone Change (3811) Height Limit Exception (3898) _ Lot Line Adjustment (3884) Nonconforming Remodel (3866) DATE /- 61-96 Parking Plan (3857) Permitted Use Request (3885) Planning Commission Appeals (3888) Precise Development Plan (3867) Tentative Map - Subdivision/Lot Split (3809) Tentative/Final Map/C.U.P. Extension (3883) Text Amendment, Private (3886) Variance (3808) Voluntary Lot Merger (3887) 300' Radius Noticing - 1st Noticing (3868) 300' Radius Noticing - 2nd Noticing (3890) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (attach additional pages if necessary) a td►.f-t ?PLt /Jt-tfr vom IL oevai....oeek-tqctr Total Fees RECEIVED FOR OFFICE USE ONLY- RECEIVED BY: DATE OF SUBMITTAL: JAN 9 1996 PLANNING DEPT. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT (Signature required from current PROPERTY OWNER, not owner in escrow.) Name S P. ',Apo N / e b Signature Address ,6"--0 / S FP u L V E 4r --9P- /0, /y) fi-N I- A TiA ki g E C(4 CA. - 90A6G Telephone 3/0 -546- 7750 itieco, ,u6oci A [. S�eJJ c 6/ CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907 �fJ.rlllllll./�lllfllllllJlllllll-/lllll.,.�lllllllll.�l�lllll./�lr!l../lll./llll./..� State of C p{, FOR Ail A County of kos 7A kG E LES A On D TE personally appeared before me, NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - .G., "JANE DOE, NOT -Y PU:LIC" . La -TO Ik\r' NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) ❑ personally known to me - OR -Ly proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(.s,), whose name..)) is/axe subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he,414e4l ay executed the same in his/.I.e-r/the-r authorized capacityjes), and that by hisLber/their signature(e) on the instrument the person(6), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(e) acted, executed the instrument. NAOMA VALDES'fr V " y NO? JCO J,-UC�5314 ORNI G ,FoyMy Comm cxaae5 Jan 16. 199 WITNESS njy hand and offial seal. OPTIONAL SIGNATURE OF NOTARY Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ IWIVIDUAL /CORPORATE OFFICER a PEATT TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) ARCp• �11JA4G Ai- , I1.)C. DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT P.�.�. R?pm cim 013 FOR 130! MAi1ft7r/ 71 __ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT 0th NUMBER OF PAGES q, 119 (e. DAT OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE lllllllllll./lllll./1.r1./.�llllJll�!l�ll�lllJl-/✓lll/JIl.IJlllll-/./"lll./llll./�fJ ©1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 62 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROJECT ADDRESS 13 0 1 Itis ks' -r-r 41F1 A-Ve Project Name (If applicable) LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1ES1!e [415 gTi4U i APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name(s) \('4 dit okM s A.nLD ,n LEGE L d w I G - ZONING Phone337q-89 33 Mailing Address 70 /0 11#i o AiTe/Zc-1, /Shed Metz/tor/4 I,C4cU SCA 9029 Applicant's Relationship to Property d *I have inquired about the need to obtain a Coastal Development Permit from the Coastal Commission, and understand I dR (/ do not require a permit. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE PROJECT REQUEST Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) (3812) _ C.U.P. - Condominium of Units (3812) C.U.P. - Amendment/Amortization (3805) _ C.U.P. - Minor Amendment (3899) C.U.P. - Fences & Walls (3864) Environmental Staff Review (3803) Final Map (3 810) General Plan Amendment/Zone Change (3811) _ Height Limit Exception (3898) _ Lot Line Adjustment (3884) Nonconforming Remodel (3866) DATE Parking Plan (3857) Permitted Use Request (3885) Planning Commission Appeals (3888) Precise Development Plan (3867) _ Tentative Map - Subdivision/Lot Split (3809) _ Tentative/Final Map/C.U.P. Extension (3883) _ Text Amendment, Private (3886) Variance (3808) Voluntary Lot Merger (3887) ?( 300' Radius Noticing - 1st Noticing (3868) 300' Radius Noticing - 2nd Noticing (3890) Total Fees (o CO 7 -5 - DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (attach additional pages if necessary) L.L. Re S T.g-v (List's/1'. A,w 13 t .)e.P-4 i t 'CM ?xc t_ N4 1i) /NC SM 4 C -c- 14 49%, D i o 'Tit.; r/ V- rw R t PT. 11S X1.1 c Bec t — - 6-51 VT shop 4ni u p s74U'rz..s O PPict FOR OFFICE USE ONLY- RECEIVED BY: DATE OF SUBMITTAL: OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT (Signa re required from current PROPERTY OWNER, not owner in escrow.) Name l.1pl►5 - Signatur Address A6-0( SE`\ou L _01A-'J14A'TTg1J /IOWA- CA, ____ k Telephone S I0—34(0—Z-76:( • CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907 ef:l,/lll�/Il�• • „rdl./llIlli./l/./llJll./1./1ll�Jl••• •„ • oz. oz. ll/•z. State of C.LI1Athn. County of ks 1110G E.L.E.S On D CE145 A 2g, 1ggc before me, DATE personally appeared ❑ personally known 3.P. %kyr RoMA- VADE.SI koQt41ue�l NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBL NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) to me - OR -�1/ vved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person+e)- whose name(e)- subscribed ame(.e)- subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/hey executed the same in his/hcr/thcir authorized capacity( -est, and that by hisPere-rtthe+,' signature(•$ on the instrument the person(.$, or the entity upon behalf of which the person($• acted, executed the instrument. r , . ti NAOMA VALDES V 0 Lr Comm #953147 NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA°, LOS ANGELES COUNTY 0 1y Comm. Expires Jan. 16, 1996" • v v• • • v • WITNESS my hand ad official seal. OPTIONAL SIGNATURE OF NOTARY Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER .0 INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) LI LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ITY(IES) S P_I..F — to sJ ER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT ?. tom. O. D. Ap uclrnot� COP. FOR 1301 qAtatI-7171-A)4-. TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES •DectetHER DATE OF DOCUMENT 13613 SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE .l.�ll�llI.�1l./lllll.✓IlrlllllI✓,�lJI1.�I.Cll./I.IJl./.,/.I.IJ./Jllll./ll✓lr/J�lll././1lll./J ©1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 376-4626 March 11, 1996 City Council City of Hermosa Beach Honorable Councilmembers: We wish to appeal the recent planning commission approvals of CUP's or PDP's for the following projects: 1. Hennesseys expansion into Diana's, at 2, 4, & 8 Pier Avenue 2. California Beach moving southward to 834-344 Hermosa Avenue 3. The building and Einsteins brewpub at 1301 Manhattan Avenue We each enclose our personal check in payment of the fee for appeal. Thank you, Shirley Cassell Wendy Doeh Richard Everett Parker Herriott Adele Icaza James Lissner Sheila Miller Robin Paterson Robert Simpson Brice Torres Joseph Vogl 6s HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Planning Commission -Chairperson Pete Tucker and Members of the Planning Commission City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 1301 Re: Development Project at -1400 -Manhattan Avenue Dear Chairperson Tucker and Members of the Planning Commission: February 13,1996 hEUL+ALU FEB 13.1996 PLANNING DEPT. At the Chamber of Commerce Board. of Directors meeting on Thursday, February 8, 1996, the members unanimously voted to support the LaPointe development project at 1400 Manhattan Avenue. On behalf of the members of the Board, I want to convey their support and endorsement of this upscale new development in our downtown area. This project represents precisely the type of tasteful, high duality, low impact development we welcome to Hermosa Beach. Provision of two decks of parking spaces to accommodate 82 vehicles will benefit the downtown vicinity and is a most welcome addition to the area. Please consider our wholehearted support of this project during your decision-making process. We would like to reduest that this letter of endorsement be included in the agenda packets for the February 20, 1996 Planning Commission meeting. Thank you in advance for your consideration of our position. Together we can work to make Hermosa Beach the best possible place in which to live, work and prosper. Sincerely, Carol K. Duff Executive Director cc: Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director bC 1007 Hermosa Avenue • Hermosa Beach, California 90254 • (310) 376-0951 • FAX (310) 798-2594 T RECEIVED JAN 1 6 1996 PLANNING DEPT. EIN STEINS RESTAURANT AND BREWERY CONCEPT SUMMARY 1.0 Background Although the popularity of brewpubs appears to be a recent phenomenon, prior to Prohibition there were nearly 4000 brewpubs in United States. Because of changes in the law and consumer tastes, brewpubs are being rediscovered in a domestic marketplace that demands better quality. Over the past 10 years, the number of brewpubs has grown from eight to more than 450. More than 80 brewpubs are in California alone. The success of brewpubs is based not only on more demanding consumer tastes, but also on simple economics: hand-crafted beer brewed in-house produces greater returns than selling mass-produced tap beer. According to the Institute For Brewing Studies, the success rate for brewpubs is 85%. This compares to a success rate of less than 10% for conventional restaurants and bars. To ensure Ein Stein's success, Ein Stein's management has combined: 1. A high probability of success restaurant/brewpub concept. 2. A highly desirable location. 3. A financing strategy that draws investors from a local investor pool that represents a cross-section of ages and professional backgrounds. 2.0 Concept Description 2.1 General Ein Stein's Restaurant and Brewery will offer fresh, high-value perceived food complimented by consistently high quality and flavorful beer brewed on-site using only the best ingredients. Food and beverages will be served in a relaxed, architecturally interesting, spacious and inviting restaurant environment. 2.2 Design, Decor and Layout Ein Stein's Restaurant and Brewery will include Description • Area (sq. ft.) The enclosed restaurant and brewery 4,405 A gift shop 421 Office, banquet, storage space 1,825 Ein Stein's Concept Summary 1 RECEIVED JAN 1 61996 PLANNING DEPT. Both the interior and exterior will be designed to create a dramatic, visual impact on patrons. The exciting, entertaining and inviting atmosphere will be characterized by an open layout that features the stainless steel and copper brewing tanks and equipment. Along with the natural wood -finished interiors and high ceilings, these "working features" will lend authenticity to the restaurant and brewery environment. The dining and bar area will seem spacious, and the kitchen contemporary and open to the view of patrons. Included in Ein Stein's design is a small area, adjacent to the kitchen, where fresh beer will be kegged and bottled for sale in the gift shop and for off-site sale and delivery. Also included is a rooftop terrace that affords a 360 degree view of the Pacific Ocean and San Gabriel Mountains. Management believes an outdoor serving area with an ocean view is highly desired by South Bay patrons and visitors alike. 2.3 Food, Beer, and Beverage Menu Ein Stein's menu will feature a combination of moderately priced and favorite American entrees, emphasizing both Southwestern and "health -conscious" California cuisine. All food, including baked items, will be prepared fresh each day. No MSG or lard will be used. The extensive menu, prepared with only canola and olive oils, will include a dozen appetizers, a variety of entrees including individual gourmet pizzas, specialty sandwiches, salads, pastas, and fresh fish burritos and tacos, and more traditional "pub fare." Entrees typically will range in price from $6.00 to $10.00. Ein Stein's will feature hand-crafted beer brewed on-site using only the four traditional ingredients: malted barley or wheat, hops, yeast and pure water. Ein Stein's will not use adjuncts such as corn or rice or chemicals for processing or preservation. The beer menu will consist of five to six freshly brewed ales, stouts and seasonal brews pulled from a rotating list of eight to ten Ein Stein's beer recipes. The restaurant will also offer a wide selection of premium wines, domestic bottled beer, and non-alcoholic beverages. Ein Stein's brew master will continuously brew and test new beer recipes and styles. The most promising brews will be entered in regional beer tasting competitions. Ein Stein's management will be meticulous in assuring the cleanliness of the facility and quality of its products. 2.4 Retail Merchandise To supplement its service-oriented marketing efforts, the restaurant will operate a small, contiguous retail store that will offer merchandise such as T-shirts, sweat -shirts, jackets, shorts, and specialty gift packs of bottled Ein Stein's beer. Other items for retail sale will include cards, premium cigars and souvenir items bearing the restaurant's name. Ein Stein's Concept Summary 2 3.0 Target Market Ein Stein's management defines its target market as business and professional people, and college students who reside in the South Bay area, particularly in Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach. Both communities are unique, inhabitant friendly communities that support a large concentration of young professionals. Hermosa. Beach and Manhattan Beach restaurants also draw heavily from the mid and West Los Angeles areas as students and others seek more congenial venues for entertainment. 4.0 Promotions/Advertisinq 4.1 Grand Opening Ein Stein's will conduct two "dry run" private parties for staff friends, investors, and local business people several weeks before opening. This will be an opportunity to test staff, policies and procedures, and to generate goodwill. Approximately 750 meals and about 1500 pints of beer will be served during these parties. A limited number of free T-shirts, hats and sweatshirts will be given away during the events. Advertisements in the Beach Reporter and Easy Reader will be run four weeks prior to and four weeks after the Grand Opening. 4.2 Ongoing Ein Stein's will strive to provide its customers with dining experiences that encourage repeat business; therefore, the restaurant will rely primarily on word- of-mouth. Management's primary objective is to build, establish and maintain the restaurant's image and customer awareness and loyalty via discrete but pervasive print media advertising. In addition, the sale or give away of novelty items (toothpicks, matches, T-shirts, cards and such) will keep Ein Stein's in the public eye. Ein Stein's will also pursue publicity and goodwill through community participation and grants to non-profit groups that result in newsworthy information securing editorial rather than advertising space in local media. Ein Stein's will abstain from sales promotions (discounts, coupons, etc.) that encourage one-time purchase or sale of its products by appealing to the economy -minded, but that could demean the product. 5.0 Operations and Staff Management believes that a significant factor in Ein Stein's success will be its ability to exceed customer expectation, and that employees are a significant contributor to this end. Each of Ein Stein's employees will have direct contact with patrons and will be responsible and accountable for the experience of their customers. Management will give its employees greater decision-making authority at the customer level than that which is given by competing Ein Stein's Concept Summary 3 establishments. Employees will be selected on the basis of congeniality and willingness to accept this level of responsibility. All Ein Stein's serving staff will receive extensive education in the brewing process and the products served in the restaurant. Management believes that its focus on the employee will result in not only exceptional customer service, but also lower employee turnover, improved productivity and an effective employee recruitment tool. Management seeks to attract and retain high quality, experienced restaurant managers by providing them with the authority and the financial incentives to carry -out their responsibilities. Managers will be sought out who have completed formal restaurant training associated with a successful regional restaurant chain such as California Pizza Kitchen, Charthouse, and Fi Torrito. Management has also identified and discussed future employment with a bre }- master candidate. This individual brings more than 15 years of forrrl ftl educat4op and professional training to Ein Stein's management team. Ein Stein's Concept Summary WALK AROUND BLLDING 42" NIGH RA4NG PECEivLL) JAN 1 6 1999 PLANNING DEPT. DINING 800 5Q. FT. SEATING 120 CHAIRS AT TABLES 20-25 AT BAR PACAAGNG 170 50. rr. pnntWASFt Pass TtiRU ROO SQ. Fr. igTC ! BAR G50 50. DINING 345 54:1 FT. UP 514110N FOOD COOLER ENTRY 12 5Q. FT. WOMEN5 GIFT srtoe 421 5Q. FT. FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED RESTAURANT 1301 MANI-tATTAN AVE. SCALE: 1/10' = 1'-O 11 JAN 1995 • PATIO BELOW AT FIRST FLOOR PATIO 524 SQ. FT. 5'AIRS n0W, sANQUET OR OFFICE 430 SQ. FT. KITCHEN DUCTS STORAGE ROOM 400 50. FT. OFFICE 488 5Q. FT. -15 F L (TENABLE SKTf ICttT ABOVE UPPER PATIO 750 SQ. FT. STORAGE CLOSET FOR MALT !ILL S -ARS D¢WH TWO 15 5CL UNTAM( I OPEN TO I BELOW L_ VEZZANNE z15 5 . rr. CATWALK 15 851 SERVNG 15 DCL SERVING 15 DCL SfRVNG 15 561 SfRVNc PROPOSED RESTAURANT SECOND FLOOR 1301 MANftATTAN AVE. SCALE 1/10". - 1'-0"" 11 JAN 1996 RECEIVLU JAN 1 6 1996 PLANNING DEPT. 3- -7— • lQ 20 1)16 O ff'cotis¢rc<cooti I30(, Dear Cc -I -I{ Coco#c(, ( r s 114(2_ Pcaln MQtikg77 ) 4 e L w r rfe cru i <v p,x)s e744,N -{c, 416. c 1 re -+v - p to L)3 o c`le ,r -4-kcs eommerc(6( pjec.4. r l r Z ddo /'S vo r k C) ryC -f itQ s 14-e- :Q ( 4k.e bctizk s woMJd +00 r e c. - 4 rsc- f 1-h f.4-1 k,)5 pro-Gre- afe.. Se f -- C -e k)zra L lk{ -1 ke prob(envt.s c r -e_ o . t1'3) spaces (os+ a o V.k� � stat alai l int_05h /c&rcQ jt 1ce S (tQcre_asec? kDocse_ a /grosS -FrotA o2.e& 46, area ( mac rec Seco 01\11itiga-fed? d t s-f-Gtr(eg, -Cro pa-troNs -{-rte 4 c b(ocV.-a.5e Crecefe s a P r y so i .i r ct,-tnvtQ S pl r -Qo r ry elG\ bo rs too b -f Cao (1±L-- co { c) ctrl e rerz,._)-ety /..)c) b-(er Zo �e- oU.rru.secQ • ► k -s jkfr-=) (\Ac,/-,)5toi•-) d �c5ti (Ylck or pc1.1*--c&-30" (c)5 S dctrciv5 co►..)sfruc_+to". Q 0-6 ct, pLaF-) Co cd Co res ---ho . (Jr,6Wenn --ecicec-edl 4 + eS Ci, flittas Ce/vlQ./� s A (cora( --(c> -4 ke. p (c,i...)1 K5 J. -e 4- cc olple-) soo /4-1 G (t .e S �� (( 0-( (s R_--9.s-(-G pct /8fAr , Y2. c ce 5 tce. Accordr . 3 - C14t( Codes 1. ( (cry 5 p2crL x3ek-cuA(cyD s. = Si 6 C) tch 5 - ,(. L( 5 ,p- ct c eS 65(=C -12,S1 5.,c"-": 514 5pctces 0-4t C.0 2 SCS s = c cor02(Nn e_es4 Sq (ev s. � c\ -(-Aces t spge per Bar £ s.-(1 3 . ' q9 (756s); + 35 ices 55$.4= c(c( ceox 4c4 q (65" ---`1-5" Q6: C>'(Ce = ± 3(e Tc (s(Jqces l32. Z)2ckAt A ( ees4ctcy,-)-k- .13cv- 2 o o S-ec,-f-S -t- (S e, rn p (o y -e es c s 50 ct M. (ti LOVA /)'‘. C - CO 5 PCi. cQ S CIA 0 t•-›-e-- CT./1A •-›-e-- C cizS t -ems --(-k i ( 3 S cx c- S . ( (Ce re. Nkece -E v ecittess pr -k, ct cowed c l c m b q ,Jo -Mer- 26 5 PqCe', 5 ! n.--)Cn w __ kc u C Licv- +ee_ w1 -.a S ice cAv 4 6, 5- y pctft retcom 5 pace_ or 4-k € l : ( C5 -ea (152.5 g) c.�G! k S OL -4+b O s pgc-c.eS(6-6/5-0 (a sQ((4 lyr5, Abp a yon c.cA --1/us -1 w �L std 4-ta ( pa --k t Priam t ( i e cl o a (V -t3 s 4-(-e sA& u. &" Ltp n s ids k p 3 61: +1,2_ eu-s. ) T ke c_A-rr`e-4-A Li ) (c. �v-eZ S3 S pct cc% > (.-Qa-u. (tS A - .e Q — s S±L± a k- p_ec c ria ' /It'- (c 44,0 Co Vs paces --(c) r - Gil w & x cess L u- (\ec(-c Lc s --( I- e_ va. (u_2 . c kr- re s 1 Gee ta,1 p f o rn i+S -1 (.2 SS 404 t (a. (o t (c -ty e , ,s K prtSo Lt CGit'tI 5 1tirk CZSe lou r s dart I,-)5, +k e- e.�.e e_l�q euerLt w.ee ked 4 acv..((a tis k (Lcc ° / S Pae c«( eat - - . pci. ry t ltd G t Jd rt -e S ctoo cS4 +c5 -4ke cra511. C--RflejU.441/4.(ti (OuSI �sS S-( k)c) b tock- prouJes qrv� G,(‘ pa<kt N.0 a,`f- a l .„(c)110401,..)\) bu S't koeSS-es sc.r 5(Ail-at/1/4_4coi..)5 -(c>r t 4 pro uccQ-e Q. A)L( c u St{o n2.Qr s r e_nri plot( -e es a f2m p(o,.t .e.e5 e54 -(e5 (3i3 &ticA kr-i-cd" `,,-i1Q Qo�t,+ (� c tCe5 5t cSk Si rc .(x-) 6—.21i\ct pa �� w� -e N5 (o (2q&`5 o€ 4-k.e / .e ti.) -ems,( 5 -fore.( (cost o u- Lel � 1114k kris> u.h 51 T c t c C < <S ( (a (r cci -er1s , `T d -2.t & ym E e S�:or� Cf th 5ustA, (5cc), �-t- a boc,c-k-- s p 1 e r - (:)5 w1 Z-c19a, (V c ti . 'T�lc S )5 L5'`' w 41A par -{!t &35 c o r pGr to S W ope .- V I_ c 5 5e( rc.cc-4cAre_ or.) pal In `Drt.u2 T lid,c S cia Le i, l Creoc Z b (oc c��z o pc I nr\ L)(.41/\ p.eo Ql ()Lai £{ o. t C9 or 8 S pq c -_12S d res u,la.r o w Gl P c d1 .�f u S �ti(S o p -e,-) + we f Glno orla 5 ti c4- a� C o -ro ( CCAr- t riv S O ..er- G r Se s 41)ui S 4-L /\e --s cmc, k(00r%c ocf , TkL - X c & N p4 (iv% Or. j O (..eck,4 S--ree,i 0LAAS 4t1 cars 0 11-1 th S`f - t t 6 0\ \i -ex p r(.e c, --- S -- -(ria, d r (942-r5 .rte 63 01 k3,5 40 6,2. bur 1 neto e c rub b -€r c c p (q& s41. 640(4,--10, Also /-/ s w sa -' ha(); (vor\L cars p4Ss1 13eS-tt S 10S --ex. .f 1s r �{ o eco crf- (cu t /1\ nam l cff(.e S Gt. vvk ( s a CI o wa' 4'floM (04- b --%w-04 aes4w s < s 04,t r\ a 10 (1 t.pcQ 5 pccf Cou..ot La c e s,e_ ArLuers 0 pal mr bC ct-At +o u:'ffs ES a,S K.) L 4 f•-)Sur-ct rt, s re(-04-s/-(cicch-ti-5 d am.-- sem- -( are L cce-eoe c /h c)- t e,(es 406 i 3eS41e3 a,( i`ezzat lis a s, fLous p rcbleivx - tsoz o •v �� �' +� �rz��- c_)41- .44„.'ec C door o p -4-k do t.4.14.,„-.1\0 c I x 1d c + — o r 4. . Scnertm, ac5e3 a aN a /r.-5 velar- b c v'iL3 o s (.P <<i 571 4* c (o5 c- . Pc No+(c.rz. S Lu -e- ti �--kc f C c,�S—{-0 5 / ct s LcQ.2N-'l_q. ( / -F.� t bof G,oaca( Q s - jd ( (-e`t,u.t_ -eac Pe..04- ,,& 04' --j s a f- a i/e5S &kp3 are- dlc�o uce +(e -e_ pa.c Th'?L C-) k r-&Lce.t are- G i�S r -4-0 pct4 cc p c4- • AlL4 - k - 41,e_ co prbbi (-4 c6 reed Eo-efy 5r � (e L tc L?/Z pqc ha ef) IL)5c ti -ed Cu) 444, CO iv (.0 k.2,L) (A.., a S (ctS4- 4(v so e bcwecr k:Qd - r c?'`y4/k5 b(,t4- 4-&& abso l ca T'k'mW7// , A --k) a beikdeidutie o`C Co c.r\e---f �.- (-z - cC S Av5 4,2 _A <S c1,4 i e T des r 5 /ok s ((,fie v (d � rc�o ►.� �a� 13-e 4. �f c-tppte ✓���S�oN �co� �Swra- /8(8.1„) pub . The look_ is hcrc u k-)c.oi/vl.ceo inuS.i 4cade a k.,Ad -Q 7rR cf &C tit, 0 -+cam sok ? P (u,S --kz- bu t, CoQ J L-&.te_ past c {7C411c( 5 s o -. 4-12- -ecQc 4 bcc e- ( t,tt(.- U t- k L (rtt e 1 WlQ'tt0 1..)0 I pcQ 0-f- a bc-t CPt, ( Pe -cd or a s.e--&-c-( • Co t (S 4 k t s coot ,►.)c,c S+ - a (1 C o k ru c. -oto 7_0 ase_ w t -t -k tQ a rc-t,h 2S o bate � fr\R,u.e- b.ee_ t a, (nG4.--i ry‘. c)* 4- k\S b-e,?-0-tc-) (-e4- .4-41 ctocc, +kat{ sc,0, 0 QcA's c4.., ba nt Siltrefs ek.ks-5 NQS pczK pacb'L < < {-t' c(-ec 4-k rct +Le - J2 -0,-)a c>4 .e IJ o C inp e' scut otJ ( o Lx) rms 4-1/VIS t s at J o r prose - w t 4-1A at on.ct J o r L rvl pct. Com}" c s t4 -- (40 -)ds (c+-,dS-4-odeky (V, 0.- bcx6(fcorn p(ex la 1,-) 4-o jc-te_ vs- c s (4-- c60 ( &-'.9 --4-o 5c,,fhD -ex c1.se,51? (.t.) l 1 -(-k e_ c.)w' cr-5 cc> r n -ti t" reig I e- S h 1 �� (�( w . fl t� be- o4- 4-1,e $q,/► -tom -eo& cu Se S `"), K..)6(4..)..e.rs pc74-e-ri---(A,t rckcoo p M s-1- be_ cArLc C.) cal +. 54 -1 -cc -Hy se,1 4c ecd < A-1/1 p mits4- 0,) o r 0 144 o -0\e_ Nt,i inloarkc S c v `` t .Qi s aijv ere-. A ►- hope_ coca e - a nc.p rt.4(bM. cs» S o P. �l Of-) Sci'vao`t S c p(.ea s, ( . ZetLtre ck re -c -1/44c -tit pCa bQ sctb otctrec11. comp (e-4 ji p t apprix(. k((-- yeg_ 'fiC L)c)((,os.)..(a!`C tt( Co t•-.)'4- rt (no tie.._ q • rvo"- proii, Kiirl-CAt,t - ree 0i,t--11/1/4--) J (o `tp `10 h€/p 11° . ore,51--- -4474- /' bee., de 4r.eg{ee w c -i t N ()iv"- 4- d t s u b mit 1- pbo -4 035 V e-edc‘ce ci(o&-) r --e, +(re_ ,k00 r Top - oof . IRke cx-c- - -G�e -e 3 A co t o m S -- c adds Co e, So pek) Lip Metz_ci. _ Se - f atot-.TALS.__)J' ck-e.e-(r,vJ or( orrTor4- 0ti s- or( Ea muck 5,.& Et bock_ leed•e_5(DA..) 14 r s all edvcfo Sej 44 labb/ei i (jr (,Q-eG(a(`Q_ (4- a.� c (ckfk Free_ Zor.s� t.J� n1n1- ti e 4c c ' p•� ac,-f-tt 144-1A0 D5(): &cuc tre_. q " kNcic o,C cer (57i_ `7 C ,C,2,24_ a(c)K-) G��taN 6‘Puz _ 4 ti& pk+ l . pees (.1,)c.›4pr` (rti� w t -t -k q (S �+ ,M i,-)iM.uM r.e.e - low-4-er - c -(p 5 ZcPes Et w .e s 4- side_ c4- -44\12._ bi.tactG 0 4-1,\44- 44 -are- -..v-02/'S-e .-{-k,2_. c (rec ho v eC peq,10A. `fir. o (k4 k w eT-d luA--w i" p r re.T' .0. o f.CK.)a,,-fz 4- (tie -ex-7.,4- +c pct( ryt Zerut,it eqc- ?Le, sce67)7/ .e-A__)1‘rce,r,6/.e. p( +0 mrlrocit A 4/ tijQrece-- tioisSe <Clert M ' - S a S -1-e- timed (&J7 4-1-e_yes ale bell n...xe_Ablity.w. hood be.*.re, p/ok.)s ,q,pccecee C�.ef cO tltqtiC17,5 ,u o e v� � wic> PA -ti LD) suit_ x..50 -zINA .pres1cP 60 b. Rl more_ -koor o4 Scc,b-4-errct,.->-ek:t pc4i-Ki k..)5 or 4-ota, ( o -(i (1`.20+ p j & 3 Cr( 32, 3p cQS I`ertia,crt )C) /t-Siei1/4-04 5)/ces 132_ 5 { 9 C -Q S U t--1 s 4-e_ -4- (The.Q,u -e rK p l oki -e os -(-c) PaiV- tio (cS4-5 (,J-eg 1- 04- (4 -erne) , eec C (.,2 (oct,c(d2t 3 Sc 2e +o be 1001 (5--(4 -for parKik.33— 4-0 5 c (A (Y)V (a,- ("4 q t- 61 art" -u -cut 5pacQS (os -t) (Ls --ke_ (04--s o H- - r evkasct d eSi3 Qct,+ -ed S (ne S Le 2 ok k/ro qty` , prouteke 3 0 o k +L c bC- ceS "rY-Sid • ti t,- e 1\1\4Ufa t�c� (Z�SL& (J..erntiLk oN(4_/roL') pnouick, Z S S 194 ce 5 a S q boe-t- (,e fAct 4 tt'a (e) c bo v -e._ . Et r e s -i- (;1C pt( M `Or q .(-2 e+ L c cQG ,•--te€ (kL6(45(5iL)4.-Atk.),e1 pCif k ).()- Spc.)1 S S edeA-d45 ( f 14-- 0 A-) tY he 11 k;Ce --'*eho the —C)'-- 5 1),2-Stj i\--7"vi-e— a 1. (c),K (<4-th - 4c) ((e A 1641-\- 4(.3 H tr Akci vvic..),y1 L.,=2- ct q p ( A (Lcth -46.) 2. pcfis It/1 s Ck, ts_.) 3 , — 0 r )R.)04 3c) ctA-S r\e. s cfe (..)--tt-t, So t re_ c4. basi &.,ez +Lc 44.4 /tie 4-4-e 1,3 3 0+3 o 11-er 7)10f a 601 e..aS — or — so co/1k 10, 04 -44-1- ciboc,,, a tsscuz_ 0.Q,Pfttis 3o co ilk b 4 4 etbov-k._ A 0110 Pas IL—J( per .1AA s 4+ at( sii,A.e.r 6104il-s ALJ kab,(zre 5+rce-e.-4- 5 4A -ix -e- ^.)e3 4 Psar4 r 4 -k -el is 63 „) GGA,41 C S i l cu•e .. O r x co ,1/4-> se cc -c.. -}-0.,.e o r svt,K. l 41 p(,.. cQou S 4' sack V0C<-- } `' A (t -t9(2 _<-(- o/kJ Y7__ k o c -r_ (VA ct �� ►� �a � c-(� S teems a a` (- .-ere,&.)(4-- pe..v-4- 0 sf e `- l 51& `h t rti 1C�1 ry c k- i Y2 k oL-4- c)44\c z ki:Ap 01. (04 `T s c2.1/4k o M. ore- vvt f • tv t c t000i,, 0, c -eek.t --eoc c -e 4 -Le re - 5 tde� Es h! S has R s iii( (tic e 5/& ppb/e1A1 4613 1 S (is 4 1-1-k6&--iu &i S76 P. 5on c4 ha 04- 40 ci 0 so me_4-14,,i L.)3 ctiocu(-- 4 -Gas K)ok..) • l(-e/vctyorh4S O" �� s ^T obc_s-e c -I -t ue.._ h -ere_ e S -k' ',LA) c f bcesiNess Goko aN.- 5-e (-e-5<<4 c.c e»-.+ Cox()o'f' ct b(Arcie,,i n6u ivc:>w fraus1- -f , r,v-&Q --E-kQ 041-ax.r. chew k q Aapvi b -e(` o cC S late-. lL ` 1-1-k s -kb lrshot.4-3 IL) -fociti I do su /We)r 74- a 0 rbc iiuo •eco,L.om �c -Uti Ute{.`-( b ,/ I7 S i<sis s ,S 'c k -e.. ( ( -f-1i e cddc 7L(oti 6?',1.2W hfeizerr(—(,, brv,,0 pub ah cl / S eiLau,'eiis q tike tie Odd 14oti bc-t tiof a II . e , 4,2x15, -e' e e ti.s k�a tic pro b(e. i)-1 c )14GL `f L € gyfio 5 bet ,s-ea4r 4 -)1( �a S -4--1&04f is h 5a (0 a S 5 c ccip Pl o c h 4-0 1. -e -e p ± lA,tN 3 S 4K -G' --cr CD i) f Nos- l s -e { i ti ( 4-- 4. pro biz ► c-L\b,se f_ < e.) -ti Co L LO ti s 11\44., �� v� -�c ( 4i,� r ►� nc-cce i N J 4-1415 (G (-J. 1 (-ri . SI C Lc& 437211-0--;/ 1 . r April2, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE Recommendation: That the City Council approve the revised ordinance through introduction and waiver of full reading. Background: The City Attorney has revised the draft Conflict of Interest ordinance. The ordinance applies to members of the City Council and appointed members of City boards and commissions. The ordinance effective date has been left blank and staff would suggest that the effective date be June 1, 1996 as that is about the time it would be effective through the normal adoption process. The City Council could set a different date if you wish. As directed, you were each provided with a copy of a letter from the City Attorney listing all the cities whose conflict of interest rules were reviewed prior to drafting the ordinance before you. Res • ectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager • 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITIONS FOR CITY OFFICIALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Purpose. The proper operation of city government requires that public officials be independent and impartial in their judgment and actions; that government decisions and policy be made in the proper channels of the governmental structure; that public office not be used for personal gain; and that the public have confidence in the integrity of its government and public officials. Although provisions of the Political Reform Act ("the Act") govern the conduct of elected and appointed City officials, and although the City Council, through the adoption of Resolution 94-5707, has adopted a Conflict of Interest Code in compliance with the i provisions of the Act, the City Council finds and determines that additional ethical safeguards and guidelines are desirable to prohibit impropriety or the appearance of impropriety in City government. /// /// /// 960314 10649-00001 cas 1201347.1 1 2 3 Section 2: Section 2-2.19 of the Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, 4 California is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ArrOPNEYA AT LAW "(a) Any councilmember who is disqualified from voting on a particular matter by reason of a conflict of interest as defined either by the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000 et sea.)("the Act") or by Government Code Section 1090 shall: (1) Disclose the existence of a conflict of interest and the nature of said conflict on the record at the earliest possible time; and (2) Remove himself or herself from the dias at all times during which the matter is under consideration; and (3) Refrain from participating in the discussion as a member of the body and from voting thereon; and (4) Refrain from using his or her official position to influence the decision regarding the matter. Accordingly, the affected councilmember shall not contact any other member of the City Council or any member of any City commission or board, or any /// 96031410649-00001 cas 1201347.1 - 2 - 1 2 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WAYSON & GERSHON Arrorwere AT uw employee or consultant of the City with respect to the matter. (b) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to prevent a councilmember from testifying before a legislative body regarding his or her own personal interests, as defined by the Act and the applicable Regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, or from participating in a matter when his or her participation is legally required, as defined by the Act." Section 3: Article XVII, commencing with Section 2-154, is hereby added to the Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, to read as follows: "Section 2-154. Appointed Officials: Conflict of Interest. The Political Reform Act, Government Code Sections 87100- 4 91015 and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, including the City of Hermosa Beach's Conflict of Interest Code for Designated Positions adopted by City Council Resolution No. 94- 5707 (collectively referred to herein as "the Act"), Government Code Section 1090 and common law case authority define certain activities by city officials which constitute prohibited conflicts of interest and which preclude participation in or attempts to 960314 10649-00001 cu 1201347.1 - 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTC 4 VO AT LAW influence certain City decisions. The Act also defines circumstances which require disclosures be made by city officials. The following requirements are imposed on members of City commissions and boards in addition to the conflict of interest and disclosure provisions of the Act: (a) No member of any City commission or board shall submit any bid or proposal, or otherwise seek or accept any employment, contract, or consulting agreement for financial or other consideration when that member knows or should reasonably know that the prospective employer or source of consideration will require a permit or other approval from the City commission or board on which that member serves. (b) No member of any City commission or board shall use his or her public office for any personal gain, including, without limitation, the use of City stationery, property, vehicles, supplies or other City resources to obtain or promote personal or business interests. (c) Any member of a City commission or board who either has a conflict of interest, as defined by the Act, or who believes that he or she cannot render a fair and impartial decision on a matter due to bias, prejudice or prejudgment, shall: (1) Disclose the existence of a conflict of interest /// 960314 10649-00001 cu 1201347.1 and the nature or said conflict on the record of - 4 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14- 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW the body of which he or she is a member at the earliest possible time; and (2) Remove himself or herself from the dias at all times during which the matter is under consideration; and (3) Refrain from participating in the discussion as a member of the body and from voting thereon; and (4) Refrain from using his or her officialposition to influence the. decision regarding the matter. Accordingly, the member shall not contact any other member of the body of which he or she is a member, or any member of the City Council or any member of any other City commission or committee, or any employee or consultant of the City with respect to the matter. However, nothing in this Section shall be construed to prevent a member from testifying before a legislative body regarding his or her own personal interests, as defined by the Act and the Regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, or from participating in a matter when his or her participation is legally required, as defined by the Act. (d) If, in the course of performing any employment, project, work, contract, or consulting agreement for financial or other 960314 10649-00001 cu 1201347.1 - 5 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ArrORNEre Ar LAW consideration, which is in existence as of , a member of any City commission or board determines that the potential for a conflict of interest exists, that member shall immediately notify in writing the City Manager of such potential conflict. The notification shall detail the nature of the conflict, the scope of the member's involvement in the project or transaction at issue, and the general amount of financial or other consideration to be derived by the member from said project or transaction. Said notification shall include a statement as to the affected member's intention to disqualify himself or herself from any deliberation or discussion of the project or transaction at issue. The City Manager shall immediately transmit a copy of the notification to the City Attorney, the members of the City Council, and to the other members of the affected City commission or board. (e) No member of any City commission or board shall solicit or accept any gratuity, employment, contract, or consulting agreement for financial or other consideration from any person or business entity within the twelve (12) months immediately following the date upon which the City commission or board on which that member serves approves a permit or other aptlication requested by the person or business entity, where the member participated in the making of that decision. /// /// /// /// 960314 10649-00001 cas 1201347.1 - 6 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHAROS, WATSON & GERSHON AlTOFINCY11 AT LAW Section 2-155. Penalty. (a) In addition to any other penalty imposed by State law, a member of any City commission or board who violates Section 2-154 of this Code, as the same may be amended from time to time, or any other State or local law regarding conflict of interest may be censured or removed from office by majority vote of the City Council." Section 4: Requirements Supplemental to State Law . This ordinance and its enforcement is intended to be supplemental to and consistent with all applicable State laws. Section 5: Severability. If any section, sub -section, sentence or clause of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub- sections, sentences, clauses, or portion thereof be declared i invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1996. ATTEST: CITY CLERK 960314 10649-00001 cu 1201347.1 - 7 - MAYOR April 1, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 1 CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY 1 Recommendation It is recommended by staff that the Council: 1. Review the agenda item submitted on February 13, 1996 regarding the Commission's recommended master plan for Clark Field parking; and 2. Provide staff direction. Background At the February 13 Council meeting, two motions concerning the park master plan failed due to tie votes (see attached minutes). At the March 12 meeting, Council directed staff to bring back the Master Plan for the parking area at Clark Field for a review before the full Council (see attached minutes). Analysis The agenda item is attached for Council review. The Commission recommendation is to approve the master plan as submitted. IFiscal Impact: To be determined 1 Attachments: 1. February 13, 1996 Council Agenda Item 2. February 13, 1996 Council Minutes 3. March 12, 1996 Council Minutes Concur: Stephen R. Burre City Manager Respectfully Submitted, Mary ey Co unity Resources Director January 29, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 13, 1996 ICLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN PHASE I : PARKING AND ENTRYWAY I Recommendation It is recommended by Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the attached conceptual plan for the northeast section and parking lot at Clark Field. Background - At the November 14, 1995 meeting, City Council directed the Commission to return to the Council with an alternative plan for increasing parking at Clark Field. This direction came in response to the Commission's request that the Council delay a decision about adding parking adjacent to the field until a park master plan could be completed. Analysis Commissioner Mitchell generously donated his time and talents to bring Commission concepts to a blueprint. This partial master plan addresses two Commission concerns: 1. A safe parking plan; and 2. park beautification. The first issue relates to the original Council proposal to add parking to the former basketball court area just north of Clark Field. Due to turning radius problems and site limitations, the Commission felt this plan was not optimum from a safety standpoint. The original Public Works report (attached) projected that 12 spaces could be added in that area. The new plan adds 11 spaces and has further benefits in providing three (3) of these • spaces by the snack stand to accommodate necessary vehicles associated with sports leagues (e.g., snack stand manager). Perhaps even more important, is the blueprint's suggested circulation plan that would greatly enhance the flow of traffic in and out of the parking lot (currently it is a difficult lot to enter and exit). Recognizing the heavy use of the lot for the "drop-offs" and "pick-ups" of youngsters, the design allows for a drop-off zone to serve that purpose. It further adds an exit on the Valley Drive side of the park so that people searching for parking (once the lot is full) can be redirected to the Greenbelt. The second issue, park beautification, addresses a long standing objective of the Commission to enhance the park entryway and to provide more landscaping for the complex. The proposed picnic, seating and landscape buffer areas would enhance the usability of the park while upgrading the aesthetics greatly. If approved by Council, this plan will be listed as a top priority CIP for FY 95-96. Other alternatives include: 1. Amend the conceptual plan 2. Approve the original plan as submitted by Public Works 3. Request more information Attachments: 1. Conceptual Plan 2. November 14, 1995 Council item "Clark Field Parking" Respectfully Submitted, Mary ' . ' ney Com . unity Resources Director Concur: Stephen R. B City Manager Amy Amirani Public Works Director • MAphLTOAt. L. G.vMTS •1•tr H►I.I+T• rw�r�le . .I �+tINa rI-AY 1.1e4.471111. 4--• senwl.e. • 1 PP' nuts! . NAah s' -row Is.AMM.4� 6 4 $. c1.#1...0. PC-. VINLz r.cr.131.1. jeIwe. 111N •TRIIWT r ..gyp A•.Iri»! r 3 w. L►'M.11RT7. en t71< Of PIN IN* tri IMI O 01•44,44)••• lar•ur 4 ti••.•• rppti. • 1. s. i. r --Ar[K f ICLa - MAZ'i-Pic IneAti rHh�p A• e1Ty e► Pl•IMM•sA tiltA•aH 1•+•1a November 7, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 14, 1995 CLARK FIELD PARKING Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve construction of a 4' high chain link fence along the northerly border of Clark Field. 2. Appropriate $6,925.00 from perspective expenditure to the public works department budget. Background: Since City Council's October 24, 1995 directive to open the asphalt area adjacent to Clark Field for parking several problems have been observed. Vehicles have been parking and/or driving on the lawn areas, causing damage to irrigation lines, sprinkler heads and backflow valves. A report to the Parks and Recreation Commission involved the following alternatives: 1. Prohibit parking in the area. 2. Extend the existing wall to the limit of the lawn area. 3. Install chain link fence along the field border to the limit of the lawn area. Analysis: Survey of the area in question reveals that 12 -8.5' x 18' perpendicularly parked stalls can be added but the resulting backup space will be 3' narrower than suggested standards. Tire stops should be installed to prevent vehicles from hitting the wall along the north side of the asphalt area. The Public Works Department has further analyzed the alternatives and has prepared the following preliminary cost analysis for the three alternatives: 1. Prohibit parking Work entails installation of a gate at the field entrance to allow limited access for maintenance vehicles. The cost of this alternative is approximately $2,000.00. 2. Extend existing wall to the limit of the lawn area Work includes construction of 135' of 18" high wall, installation of a gate for maintenance access, tire stops and striping of the parking stalls. The cost of this alternative is approximately $11,275.00. 3. Install chain link fence to the limit of the lawn area. Work entails the installation of 135' of 4' high chain link fence, installation of a maintenance access gate, tire stops and striping of the parking stalls. The cost of this alternative is approximately $6,925.00. The Department of Public Works recommends that if parking is allowed in the Clark field area that some type of barrier be installed to prevent vehicles from enterinj the lawn areas. The installation of chain link fence is the most cost effective way to insure this. Fiscal Impact: The Fiscal Impact to the budget for the addition of 12 parking stalls at Clark Field is $6,925.00. Respectfully submitted, Y 1/1 it n G(62-' Amy Arntrani Stephen . Burrell City Manager Concur: Director of Public Works Noted for Fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance aa:clark.cc Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 27, 1996 as amended on page 9040, item 1(e) to show the adoption of a Resolution. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote, noting the absence of Benz. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 6103 THROUGH 6281 INCLUSIVE, NOTING VOIDED CHECK NO. 6170. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (Benz absent) (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (Benz absent) (d) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CONTINUED UTILIZATION OF THE SOUTH BAY PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL FOR DELIVERY OF LOCAL JOB TRAINING PROGRAMS. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated February 29, 1996. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 96-5795, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, URGING LOCAL GOVERNANCE OF JOB TRAINING PROGRAMS BY THE SOUTH BAY PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL." (Benz absent) (e) RECOMMENDATION TO SET WORKSHOP DATES OF THURSDAY, MAY 23, 1996 AND THURSDAY, JUNE 6, 1996 AT 7:00 PM FOR REVIEW OF THE 1996-97 BUDGET. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 29, 1996. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to set the dates of Thursday, May 23, 1996, and Thursday, June 6, 1996 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. for review of the Fiscal Year 1996-97 budget. (Benz absent) (f) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting to question the Commission's request for procedural direction. Community Resources Director Mary Rooney responded to Council questions. City Manager Stephen Burrell also responded to Council questions. Action: To bring back the Park, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission's Master Plan for the City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9048 f (g parking area at Clark Field for a full Council decision, as there had been no action taken due to a tie vote when the item had been heard at the meeting of February 13, 1996. Motion Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote, noting the absence of Benz. Final Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 21, 1996. Motion Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote, noting the absence of Benz. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC FOR THE USE OF ROOM 11 IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 29, 1996. Action: To approve the Park, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to: 1) approve the one-year lease agreement between the South Bay Free Clinic and the City for the use of Room 11 in the Community Center at a rate of $372 per month (400 sq.ft. X $.93 per sq.ft.) from April 1, 1996 through June 30, 1996, and at the rate per month in accordance with policy at that time from July 1, 1996 through March 31, 1997 for an estimated total rental income of $4,464; and, 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the lease. (Benz absent) (h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PRIORITY LIST FOR PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY CIP'S AND THE PARK MASTER PLANNING PROCESS. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 4, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Oakes for separate discussion later in the meeting. Community Resources Director Rooney responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendations of: 1) the priority list for park and recreation facility CIPs; and, 2) the park master planning process as outlined by staff, with the Council additions of: a) without the initial plans and drawings; b) an evaluation of the use the areas are receiving now to determine if it is appropriate to the area, such as the soccer games held every week -end at Valley Park; City Council Minutes 03-12-96 Page 9049 Further Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 96-1150, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE AND -=AMENDING THE 'UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, 1994 EDITION,' PROMULGATED AND PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS, AMENDING PROCEDURES FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT AND SEISMIC STRENGTHENING OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY BEARING WALL BUILDINGS, AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE.” Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. AYES: Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None ABSENT: Oakes Final Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 96-1150 as an urgency ordinance. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. AYES:, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Benz NOES: None ABSENT: Oakes At 8:22 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to item number 8. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 8, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 11:22 P.M. Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, public participation closed at 11:22 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers and fund balances. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote, noting the absence of Councilmember Oakes. 7. CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN PHASE I: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 29, 1996. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 10:20 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: City Council Minutes 02-13-96 Page 9030 Robert Aronoff - Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission, said that the conceptual plan approved by the Commission addressed the needs of the Park for additional parking, seating, and better vehicle traffic flow by creating eleven new parking spaces and creating an exit on Valley Drive; Brian Mitchell - Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission, created the new parking plan for Clark Field, said this provided an entry identity for the field that it had not had as well as providing better vehicle access; responded to Council questions; John Hales - 624 Eighth Place, said he did not like the plan or the seating area at• the entry; said this was a team sport park and did not need the extra seating; expressed concern that the exit on Eleventh Street was too close to the stop sign; Ron Zaragoza - 1120 21st Street, Little League, said he wanted parking instead of seating; said there had not been a problem with cars parking along the north wall and they wanted the parking left in that location. Public participation closed at 10:46 P.M. Proposed Action: To give conceptual approval, with modifications, to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to approve the conceptual plan for the northeast section and parking lot at Clark Field and ask that it be returned to Council with modifications to downgrade the tot lot area and seating, provide emergency vehicle access to the field, and provide a traffic flow report regarding the new exits on Eleventh street and Valley Drive and to continue to allow parking by the north wall in the interim. Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Bowler. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Edgerton and Benz and the absence of Oakes. Proposed Action: To allow parking in the area by the north wall by placing railroad ties on the ground to maintain a legal turning radius and to deter vehicles from driving on the field and damaging the irrigation system. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Reviczky and Mayor Bowler and the absence of Oakes. There was no further action taken on this item. At the hour of 11:20 P.M. the order of the agenda went to item number 6. City Council Minutes 02-13-96 Page 9031 mautellance of open space, noting that the •- :, Recreation a • Resourc- Commission will begin updat'•• or review by the (i) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CONSTRUCTION OF A 41 HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BORDER OF CLARK FIELD AND APPROPRIATE $6,925 FROM PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUDGET. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated November 7, 1995. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Oakes for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Amirani responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell and Community Resources Director Rooney also responded to Council questions. Ms. Rooney said the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission planned to have public hearings to receive input from the people involved in Little League and AYSO therefore it would take longer, but they would. have the Clark master plan back by February. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Robert Aronoff - Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commissioner, said the Commission had appointed sub -committees to work on the parks master plans and asked that the Council table its decision on this item until the Clark Field master plan was brought back to Council; and, John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, suggested that the people using Clark Field park at the public parking under Plaza Hermosa. Action: To allow parking in this area, but to make it legal parking by placing railroad ties three to four feet in on the grass so there will be a legal turn radius and to deter vehicles from driving further on the grass; and to wait for the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission master plan to return in February, 1996, before a final decision is made. Motion Oakes, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. COMMENDATION TO APPROVE A RE.UEST FROM THE R BEACH COMMERCE AND CONTE PRO " .' FOR THE USE OF HERMOSA AVENUE OR APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES ON JANUARY FOR THE SUPER BOWL MILE RUN - orandum from Community Resources Dir ooney dated November 6, 1995. 1• :. SUPPLEMENTAL fl INF.ORN!ATION tO City Council Minutes 11-14-95 Page 8971 March 27, 1996 Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council April 9, 1996 ORDINANCE TO REPEAL OR AMEND CERTAIN OUT-OF-DATE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council introduce this Ordinance and waive further reading. Backeround: This is the first, but undoubtedly not the last, ordinance to amend or repeal certain out-of-date sections of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. Our re -codification company, Book Publishing Co., has suggested the major portion of these changes, at the recommendation of its attorney, due to changes in the California State Codes. Other suggestions have come from the City Manager, Department Heads and staff. Our office has included an attachment to show from whom the suggestions have come and an attachment to show the ordinances that will be amended or repealed to show that some go back to 1909. Attachments: 1) Ordinance for introduction. 2) List of Ordinances being amended or repealed. 3) List of suggestions for code section corrections. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Elaine Doerfling v Stephen City Clerk City Manager -1- ORDINANCE NO. 96-11 AN ORDINANCE OF '1HE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS OR AMENDING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELETING OUT OF DATE MATERIAL FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS the City of Hermosa Beach is undergoing a major revision to its Municipal Code and wishes not to continue to include material that is out of date due to changes in the California state law, state and federal court decisions, or usage by the City of Hermosa Beach. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 1-8. "Prison labor on city streets, etc. - Authorized."; Section 1-9. "Same Labor in lieu of payment of fine."; and Section 1-10. "Same - Enforcement of two preceding sections." shall be deleted in their entirety.. SECTION 2: Section 2-3.1 "Travel expenses for elected officials, officers and employees.", shall be deleted in its entirety and now shall read, "Travel expenses for elected officials, officers and employees may be reimbursed for actual and necessary travel and conference expenses incurred in the performance of official duties subject to limitations that shall be set by resolution of the City Council." SECTION 3: to read, /// Section 2-4.5. "Compensation of city council." shall be amended "Effective April 15, 1986, each member of the city council shall be compensated the amount of three hundreds dollars ($300.00).pursuant to the provisions of Section 36516 and 36516.2, Government Code, State of California." -1- 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 4: Section 2-13. "Traveling expenses." shall be amended to read, "The city manager shall be reimbursed for all sums necessarily incurred or paid by him in the performance of his duties or incurred when traveling on business pertaining to the city under direction of the city council. Reimbursement shall only be made, however, when a verified itemized claim, setting forth the sums expended for such business for which reimbursement is requested and has been presented to SECTION 5: Section 2-14, subsection 9 "Purchasing." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 6: Section 2-51. "Purchasing department established; authority." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 7: Section 2-52. "Purchasing officer generally." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 8: Section 2-61. "Interest in contracts, etc." shall be amended to read, "Pursuant to sections 1090, 1091 and 1091.5 and sections 36525, 36526 and 36526.5 of the state Government Code, no officer shall have an interest be interested in any contract made in their official capacity, nor be purchasers at any sale or vendors at any purchase made by them in their official capacity." SECTION 9: Article VIII. FUNDS, DIVISION 1. CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND, Section 2-83. "Created; purposes." and Section 2-84. "Expenditures from fund." shall be deleted in their entirety. SECTION 10: Section 2-111. "Schedule of fees and service charges." shall be amended to read, "Fees and service charges, whether or not provided for elsewhere by ordinance, shall be set and adjusted by resolution of the city council following a public report and recommendation from the city staff reflecting the cost reasonably borne and the recommended percentage of recovery, except that the city manager .is hereby -2- i empowered to set a fee for service requests when no fee has otherwise been established, and the request cannot be met unless the city incurs costs that can be reasonably borne from fees and charges. Fees specified - - A Ole A Os shall be effective only after meeting the requirements set forth for public hearings in -Sec t -ion 93. To the extent possible, the city's fees and charges shall be fixed by one master fee resolution of the council." SECTION 11: Section 2-120. "Duty of design review board to review plans." and Section 2-121 "Categorical exemptions." shall be amended to remove reference to Lection 7 1.11 and to insert section 7-1.7 in its place. SECTION 12: Section 2-122 `Filing plan and referral to design review board", shall be amended to remove reference to Lection 7 1.11 and to insert section 7-1.7 in its place and sub -section (A)(3)(j) shall be amended to read "projects which are not exempt from state law are to be signed by an architect or registered building designer. - . • :", and to delete sub - subsections i and ii. SECTION 13: Section 4-11. "Duration of license; license fees." shall be amended in subsection (a)(1) to read, "Exception: For dogs owned by senior citizens of the city, age sixty (60) or over, showing proof of age, the license fee shall be fifty (50) percent of the rate established by this section. SECTION 14: Section 4-11(c) shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 15: Section 4-14. "License forms." shall be amended to read, "The sites finance department is hereby authorized and directed to cause to be printed annually such number of dog license forms as may be necessary,..." -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 16: Section 4-15. "License tag" shall be amended to read, "The finance department shall likewise procure metal tags bearing inscriptions showing the year for which the same shall be issued and the number thereof,.." SECTION 17: Section 4-17. "Notice Report of impounded dogs to be posted." shall be amended to read, "The contractor, acting as poundmaster of the city, upon impounding any dog found running at large, shall immediately file a report ,. . ... ... . ' _ containing a brief description of the dog. SECTION 18: Section 4-25. "Tag to be stamped with type of vaccine used, etc." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 19: Section 4-26. "Impoundment for failure to wear license tag." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 20: Section 17-54. "Violation of permit procedures." shall be amended to read: "Any person who refuses to purchase a permit for a garage sale or yard sale, or who conducts a fourth garage or yard sale within any twelve-month period, shall be guilty of an infraction ef-the-law as set forth in Section 1-7 of the Municipal Code. SECTION 21: Section 19-15. "Crossing through, under, etic., barriers at railroad grade crossings.", shall be repealed in its entirety. SECTION 22: Section 19-24. "Blocking of railroad crossings by trains.", shall be repealed in its entirety. SECTION 23: Section 21-5. "Firearms—Permit to possess." shall be repealed in its entirety. /1/ -4- SECTION 24: Section 21-6. "Same Firearms—Permit to discharge." shall be amended to read: "It is hereby declared unlawful for any person to discharge any gun, rifle, pistol, revolver, slingshot or air gun within the city without first obtained a permit in writing from the chief of the police department." SECTION 25: Section 21-34. "Threats with replica firearms." sub -section (a)(1) shall be amended to read: "As used in this section, the term replica firearm shall include any device or object made of plastic, wood, metal or any other material which is a facsimile or toy version of, or is otherwise recognizable as a pistol, revolver, shotgun, sawed-off shotgun, rifle, machine gun, rocket launcher, or any other firearm as that term is used under the provisions of Sections 12001 and 12002, 12020(D)(1) and 12570 of the State Penal Code." SECTION 26: Section 21-36 "Display of books, magazines and other publications in locations other than newsracks." shall be amended to read: "(a) Definitions. For the purpose of this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings as ascribed to them by this section: (1) "Matter" means any book, magazine, newspaper, video recording, or other printed or written material or any picture, drawing, photograph, motion picture, or other pictorial representation or any statue or other figure, or any recording, transcription, or mechanical, chemical, or electrical reproduction or any other articles, equipment, machines, or materials. (2) "Person" means any individual, partnership, firm, association, corporation, or other legal entity. (3) "Knowingly" means being aware of the character of the matter. (4) "Minor" means any natural person under 18 years of age. (5) "Harmful matter" means matter, taken as a whole, which to the -5- (b) average person, applying contemporary statewide standards, appeals to the prurient interest, and is matter which, taken as a whole, depicts or describes in a patently offensive way sexual conduct and which, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value for minors. Display of harmful matter. Every person who for commercial purposes displays by any means, or causes to be displayed by any means, or permits to be displayed by any means, in any business, other than a public place from which minors are excluded, any harmful matter, shall place upon the harmful matter a device commonly known as a "blinder rack" in front of the harmful matter, so that the lower two-thirds of the harmful matter is not exposed to view. (c) Minor need not view or gain control of material. To commit a violation of subsection (b) above, it is not required that a minor have actually viewed or physically gained control of any book, magazine, or other publication or matter as defined in subsection (a)(5) above. (d) Business persons responsible. The provisions of this chapter, with respect to the display, causing to be displayed or permitted to be displayed any book, magazine, or other publication as set forth in subsection (a) above, shall apply only to persons having proprietary interests in or managerial control of the ordinary and routine operation of the business wherein and at which time there occurs a violation of any of the provisions of this section. (e) Punishment. Every person who violates 21-36(b) is punishable by fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment." SECTION 27: Section 22-5.4 "Park reservations." shall be amended to include South Park at 425 Valley Drive. /// -6- SECTION 28: Section 23-15. "Records to be kept; inspection of records.", shall be amended to read, "Every pawnbroker, secondhand dealer, junk dealer and junk collector shall keep a complete record of all goods, wares, merchandise or things pledged to or purchased or received by him which record shall contain all of the matters required to be shown in the reports referred to and described in Chapter 9 of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California.in se,on2 23 6 and 23 ' " SECTION 28: Section 23-17. "Limitation on sale of goods obtained by pawnbroker or secondhand dealer.", shall be amended to read: "It shall be unlawful for any pawnbroker or secondhand dealer .to sell or otherwise dispose of any article or thing within thirty twenty-ene days after such article or thing has been purchased or received by such junk dealer or collector." SECTION 29: Section 23-19. "Exceptions to sections 23 d 23-15 to 23-17.", shall be amended to read: "The provisions contained in sections 23.7 and 23-15 to 23-17 shall not be deemed to apply to the purchase or sale by junk dealers or junk collectors of rags, bottles, other than milk or cream bottles, secondhand sacks,...." SECTION 30: Section 29-16. "Public hearing by council." shall be amended to read, /1/ "The council may from time to time call public hearings to ascertain whether the public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the removal of poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures within designated areas of the city and the undergrounding installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric, communication or similar or associated service. The city manager shall notify all affected property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, and utilities concerned, by mail of the time and place of such hearings at least ten (10) fifteen (15) days prior to the date thereof...." -7- SECTION 31: Section 30-2. "Tax for maintenance of parks, music and advertising purposes." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 32: Section 30-10.5. "Exclusions and exemptions." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 33: Section 30-10.6. "Application of provisions relating to exclusions and exemptions." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 34: Section 30-29. "Exemptions of governments; agencies thereof from tax; collection by assessment." shall be deleted in its entirety in order to conform to new wording in Taxation and Revenue Code Section 11922 and shall read, "Any deed, instrument or writing to which the United States, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, any state or territory, or political subdivision thereof, is a party shall be exempt from any tax imposed pursuant to this part when the exempt agency is acquiring title." SECTION 35: Section 30-40. "Taxes - Amount." shall be amended to read, "Every person constructing a new dwelling unit shall pay to the city the—sum-of an amount set by resolution of the city council, with the amount of the tax adjusted on an annual basis using the percentage increase in the cost of living as calculated by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Los Angeles -Anaheim - Riverside Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area, dollars -($37500,00) for each new dwelling unit...". SECTION 36: Section 300. "Names of zones.", shall be amended to include the Code. listing of, "O -S-2 Restricted Open Space Zone.", as shown in Article 9.52 of this Code. SECTION 37: This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 38: Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. -8- 1• 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 39: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: AB SENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -9- • March 27, 1996 Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council April 9, 1996 Attachment Section 2 Listed below are the Ordinances that are being amended or repealed: Section 1 Original ordinance number 527, enacted on August 7, 1934 (repeal). Section 2 Ordinance number 80-654 enacted on December 9, 1980 (amend). Section 3 Ordinance number 86-828 enacted on February 25, 1986 (amend). Section 4 Ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 153 enacted on May 21, 1956 (amend). Section 5 Ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 153 enacted on May 21, 1956 (amend). Section 6 Ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 205 enacted on November 27, 1959 (amend). Section 7 Ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 205 enacted on November 27, 1959 (amend). Section 8 Ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 205 enacted on November 27, 1959 (amend). Section 9 Ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 98 enacted on August 7, 1951 (repeal). Section 10 Ordinance number 90-1050 enacted on November 27, 1990 (amend). Section 11 Ordinance number 82-697, enacted on August 10, 1982 (amend). Section 12 Ordinance number 90-1050enacted on November 27, 1990 (amend). Section 13 Ordinances number 83-739 enacted September 13, 1983, and number 90-1050 enacted November 27, 1990 (amend). Section 14 Ordinance number 83-739 enacted September 13, 1983 (amend) as redundant to section 4-24. Section 15 Ordinance number 77-567 enacted July 12, 1977 (amend). Section 16 Ordinance number 77-567 enacted July 12, 1977 (amend). Section 17 Ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 120 enacted February 3,1953 (amend). Section 18 Ordinances N.S. (New Series) number 151 enacted August 22, 1955, and N.S. (New Series) number 187, enacted June 20, 1958 (amend). Section 19 Ordinances N.S. (New Series) number 151 enacted August 22, 1955, and ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 187, enacted June 20, 1958 (amend) as redundant to section 4-16. Section 20 Ordinance number 77-552 enacted March 22, 1977 (amend). Section 21 Ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 238, enacted on June 6, 1962 (amend). Section 22 Ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 238, enacted on June 6, 1962 (amend). April 9, 1996 - Attachment Section 2 - Page 1 Section 23 Original ordinance number 96, enacted on November 18, 1909 (amend). Section 24 Original ordinance number 96, enacted on November 18, 1909 (amend). Section 25 Ordinance number 87-904, enacted September 8, 1987 (amend). Section 26 Ordinance number 95-1125, enacted January 10, 1995 (amend). Section 27 Ordinance number 89-1020, enacted November 28, 1989 (amend). Section 28 Original ordinance number 599 enacted on May 27, 1940 (amend). Section 29 Original ordinance number 599 enacted on May 27, 1940 (amend). Section 30 Original ordinance number 599 enacted on May 27, 1940 (amend). Section 31 Ordinance number 77-568, enacted on July 26, 1977 (amend). Section 32 Original ordinance number 299, enacted on April 13, 1915, and approved and adopted by the voters at a special election held May 29, 1915 (repeal). And, original ordinance number 475, enacted on March 5, 1930, and approved and adopted by the voters at the general municipal election held April 14, 1930 (repeal). Section 33 Ordinance number 83-745, enacted December 13, 1983 (amend). Section 34 Ordinance number 83-745, enacted December 13, 1983 (amend). Section 35 Ordinance N.S. (New Series) number 323, enacted December 19, 1967 (amend). Section 36 Ordinance number 88-941 approved and adopted by the voters at the special municipal election of November 8, 1988 (amend). Section 37 Ordinance number 92-1082 approved and adopted by the voters at the special municipal election of November 3, 1992 (enable). Section April 9, 1996 - Attachment Section 2 - Page 2 Mayor and Members of the City Council Listed below are the sources of the suggestions Section 1 Book Publishing Company Section 2 Finance Director and City Section 3 Finance Director and City Section 4 Finance Director and City Section 5 Finance Director and City Section 6 Finance Director and City Section 7 Finance Director and City Section 8 Book Publishing Company Section 9 Finance Director and City Section 10 Book Publishing Company Section 11 Book Publishing Company Section 12 Book Publishing Company Section 13 Finance Director and City Section 14 Finance Director. Section 15 Finance Director. Section 16 Finance Director. Section 17 Finance Director and staff. Section 18 Finance Director and staff. Section 19 Finance Director. Section 20 Book Publishing Company Section 21 Public Works and staff. Section 22 Public Works and staff. Section 23 Police Chief and staff. Section 24 Police Chief and staff. Section 25 Book Publishing Company Section 26 Book Publishing Company Section 27 Community Resources and Section 28 Book Publishing Company Section 29 Book Publishing Company Section 30 Book Publishing Company Section 31 Book Publishing Company Section 32 Book Publishing Company Section 33 Book Publishing Company Section 34 Book Publishing Company Section 35 Book Publishing Company Section 36 Finance Director. Section 37 Book Publishing Company March 27, 1996 City Council Meeting April 9, 1996 for code changes: and Police Chief. Manager. Manager. Manager. Manager. Manager. Manager. and City Attorney. Manager. and City Attorney. and City Attorney. and City Attorney. Manager. and City Attorney. and City Attorney. and City Attorney. staff. and City Attorney. and City Attorney. and City Attorney. and City Attorney. and Finance Director. and City Attorney. and City Attorney. and City Attorney. and City Attorney. April 9, 1996 - Attachment Section 3 - Page 1 April 2, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1996 RELOCATION OF MULTI -WAY STOP SIGNS TO PROSPECT AVENUE AND MASSEY AVENUE - FROM PROSPECT & HOLLOWELL AVENUES RECOMMENDATION: 1. It is recommended that the City Council approve the relocation from the existing multi -way stop control at Prospect and Hollowell to the new location at the intersection of Prospect and Massey. 2. It is further recommended that City Council consider the removal of STOP controls on Prospect Avenue at First Street and Second Street. BACKGROUND: Representatives from Our Lady of Guadalupe Church on Massey Avenue presented a petition to the Public Works Department recently in order to consider the above recommendation. A copy of said petition is attached. The citizen concerns involve the difficulty in making a left turn out of Massey due to the road curvature and speed of vehicles on Prospect that approach from the stop controls to the north and south. ANALYSIS: The City Traffic Engineer conducted a study of said intersection in December 1995. The study included sight distance measurements, accident history analysis, traffic counts, speed surveys, field reviews, and comparison of traffic volume levels with recognized standards and guidelines for the placement of stop controls. A copy of said study is attached. Massey is a street that services a parochial school and a church. The street system available for the users is limited due to the proximity of the Redondo Beach City boundary and the control of street access that they have imposed at the City boundaries. In brief, the installation of a multi -way stop at the subject location is not warranted based upon the traffic volume levels and/or accident history. There is however, a sight limitation due to the curve from the south that makes it difficult for left turns out of Massey to enter Prospect Avenue. This is worse during high traffic volume hours on Prospect. Thus, the installation has serious merit. Further adding to the situation in this area is the proximity of the multi -way stop controlled intersection at Hollowell to the north. If a stop situation on Prospect at Massey were to be placed there, then the Hollowell multi -way installation would have to change. The two muti-way locations are much too close to be effective. PROSPECT AVENUE CONTROLS GENERAL There are numerous intersections along Prospect Avenue that are multi -way stop controlled. These locations have been reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer in past years with the results that for almost every location the warrants have NOT been met. 1 0 There is little, if any, documentation in the files to justify the placement of said signage. It is clear that the rational for the multi -way stop controls is to "slow" the traffic down so they do not speed along Prospect Avenue adjacent to the residential land users, and to discourage the use of this corridor as a through route through the City of Hermosa Beach. Disrespect for the stop signs on Prospect is such that recent studies of observance of the signs, i.e. how many drivers made a full stop, showed that over 68% never made a full stop at the signs. There is a need to restructure said controls so the driving public does not stop inordinately for the reasons described above. STOP signs are not speed control devices. In the Prospect corridor the traffic volume has increased steadily over the years to the point that the volume levels reflect the need for two lanes in each direction. Thus, this study of the Massey/Prospect location addressed not only the pure warrant numbers with respect to satisfying the criteria, but rather whether the location would be improved with additional controls and deletion of other controls. The combination of the increased traffic volumes on Prospect and view restrictions due to the curve from the south make it difficult during several hours of the day for vehicles to enter Prospect from Massey. The accident history is very good in that no one has been struck leaving Massey in the past three years. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Retain status quo 2. Prohibit left turns out of Massey Avenue 3. Install four-way stops at Massey and retain controls at Hollowell The latter two alternatives are not recommended. The left turn prohibition forces all users to turn right and/or travel on other residential streets in the neighborhood to exit the school and church area. Alternative 2 is not acceptable in that there would be two multi -way stop controlled intersections within 200 feet of each other. FISCAL IMPACT: None, all work can be done with City forces within formerly budgeted accounts. Respe fully submitted, k Edward J. R:- City Traffic • inee Attachments: Petition Traffic Study Concur: aine\ utavc Amy Amiran Director of Public Works A la Stephen R. B re City Manager Mr. Ed Ruzak Traffic Engineer City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 OUR Lady of Guadalupe Chuxch 320 Massey Avenue I lermosa Beach. CA 90254 Office: (310) 372-7077 Att: Hermosa Beach City Council Dear Mr. Ruzak, We the undersign, petition the Hermosa Beach City Council, to consider removing the stop sign on Prospect and Hollowell and relocate it on Prospect and Massey. Hollowell does not have the amount of traffic that is generated on Massey, which has an elementary school, a church as well as homes. Trying to safely exit Massey onto Prospect is extremely difficult, due to a curve which hampers visibility and because motorists speed around this curve until the stop sign on Prospect and Hollowell. Please give this petition your utmost and immediate attention, to avoid a serious or possibly a fatal accident. Thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. Signature AVPAV1II r Please Print 24 Agi. 4- C . /2/era eit ISA } q/(//AJF k%z,7/,V 4 � 4D1;26b--- (177 4 J o.1 Kw,.fet- D W fs C (J e. n( u l (3cb'il Signature ISM ,arimPowirsr„ Asx,We FOP . . 1 • 14 I ft rap 1,1 A ar • Ar. PL. IA.,J.t LA.MIEEIMIIIIII ,gmrzAwipwumINEIMIE. Ai .4- 7tiGeo— j- e_.c r Please Print -Jus , , ti .--c c•.(-1 Pa�-- O Sh p PA? 4c4— Cc,'" 16e. 2_ q�1. as :37-'1 I< -rct / 14 Aa-. d'c..577%7 8 . IoQ/,J --204txffigamarAir /zetYLAW, 1.-4111143Pielimmo dm; 8g/a- • ViANAM-111111Wei 1.- rif 1 '6 411, t/ sI /vim ."'A c a l U C� �' • / k���� 5T'& .� . a lib ft f /r 4 ,."►. FC K„.. -÷ Please Print -e.,f L) (5 soone-4 tri7i GO'eg �. o,Sr /,�4'7 • • Traffic Manual SIGNS R1 Standard 30" POLICY Stop Signs and Yield Signs 4-37 3-1987 • Stop Signs The STOP sign (R1) shall be used where traffic is required to stop except at signalized intersections. The STOP sign shall be an octagon with white mes- sage and border on a red background. The standard size shall be 30 x 30 inches. Where greater emphasis or visibility is required, a larger size is recommended. On local streets and secondary roads with low ap- proach speeds and low volume, a 24 x 24 inch size may be used. R1-3 At a multiway stop intersection, a supplemental plate CCM (R1-3 or R1-4) should be mounted just below each Standard 12" x6" STOP sign. R1-4 ALL WAY Standard 18" x 6" The numeral on the supplementary plate shall corres- pond to the number of approach legs, or the legend ALL -WAY (R1-4) may be used. The plate shall have white letters on a red background. A red flashing beacon or beacons may be used in conjunction with a STOP sign. See Section 9-08 (Flashng Beacons). Secondary messages shall not be used on STOP sign faces. • Warrants for STOP Signs Because the STOP sign causes a substantial incorr venience to motorists, it should be used only where. warranted. A STOP sign may be warranted at an Inter- section ntersection where one or more of the following con- ditions exist: 1. On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where application of the normal right of way rule is unduly hazardous as evidenced by accidents susceptible to correction by STOP signs. 2. On a county road or city street at its intersection with a state highway. 3. At the intersection of two main highways. The highway traffic to be stopped depends on ap- proach speeds, volumes, and tuming movements. 4. On a street entering a legally established through highway or street. 5. On a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less than 10 miles per hour. 6. At an unsignalized intersection in a signal- ized area. 7. At other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and accident record indi- cates a need for control by the STOP sign. SIGNS Traffic Manual POLICY A STOP sign is not a "cure-all' and is not a substitute for other traffic control devices. Many times the need for a STOP sign can be eliminated if the sight distance is increased by removing the obstructions. STOP signs shall not be erected at any entrance to an intersection when such entrance is controlled by an official traffic control signal, nor at any railroad grade crossing which is controlled by automatic signals, gates, or other train -actuated control devices except as provided in CVC 21355, Stop Signs. The conflicting commands of two types of control devices are con- fusing. If traffic is required to stop when the operation of the stop -and -go signals is not warranted, the signals should be put on flashing operation with the red flashing light facing the traffic that must stop. Where two main highways Intersect, the STOP sign or signs should normally be posted on the minor street to stop the lesser flow of traffic. Traffic engineering studies, however, may justify a decision to install a STOP sign or signs on the major street, as at a three-way intersection where safety considerations may justify stopping the greater flow of traffic to permit a left -turning movement. STOP signs should not be Installed indiscriminately at all unprotected railroad crossings. The allowance of STOP signs at all such crossings would eventually breed contempt for both law enforcement, and obedience to the sign's command to stop. STOP signs may only be used at selected raWhighway grade crossings after their need has been determined by a traffic engineering study. Such study should consider approach speeds, sight distance restrictions, volumes, accident records, etc. This application of STOP signs should be an interim use period during which plans for lights, gates or other means of control are being prepared. Portable or part-time STOP signs shall not be used except for emergency purposes. Also, STOP signs should not be used for speed control. • Multiway STOP signs The "Multiway Stop" Installation may be useful at some locations. It should ordinarily be used only where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approx- imately pproximately equal. A traffic control signal is more satisfactory for an intersection with a heavy volume of traffic. Olt M • Traffic Manual SIGNS POLICY 4-39 3-1987 Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi - way STOP sign installation: 1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently • needed, the multiway stop may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installations. 2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multiway • stop installation. Such accidents include right- and ightand left -turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Minimum traffic volumes (a) The total vehicular volume entering the inter- section ntersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and (b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but (c) When the 85 -percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements. R1-2 • Yield Signs The YIELD sign (R1-2) assigns right of way to traffic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled by a YIELD sign need stop only when nec- essary to avoid Interference with other traffic that is given the right of way. The YIELD sign shall be a downward pointing, equi- lateral triangle having a red border band and a white interior and the word YIELD in red inside the border band. The standard size shall be 36 x 36 x 36 Inches. • Warrants for YIELD Signs The YIELD sign may be warranted: 1. On a minor road at the entrance to an intersection where it is necessary to assign right of way to the major road, but where a stop is not necessary at all times, and where the safe approach speed on the minor road exceeds 10 miles per hour. 2. On the entrance ramp to an expressway where an acceleration lane is not provided. April 6, 1996 STEVEN A. CRECY MARY ANN CRECY 1148 SECOND STREET HERMOSA BCH., CA 90254-5335 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA SUBJECT: Proposed Stop sign change Prospect Avenue RECEIVED APR - 8 1996 CITY ''GR. OFF CE The neighbors in the Hermosa Hills area near 1st, 1st Place, 2nd Street and Third Street are extremely concerned about the proposed changes in stop sign placement along Prospect Avenue. The item was placed on your agenda with no public notice. When the matter came to my attention (late 4/5/96) I began to discuss the matter with my neighbors. The OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of the thirty six people were opposed to the changes in our stop signs. Removing any stop signs at 2nd street or 1st street will cause accidents and permit speeding on Prospect. The residents travelling to their homes on 1st Street, 1st Place, and 2nd street have a very difficult time making left turns westbound to their homes. Removing the stop signs will make it nearly impossible to turn at rush hour and will cause back-ups to 190th street. This matter should be PUBLICLY NOTICED AND A PUBLIC HEARING SHOULD BE SCHEDULED. In the brief time I had to get the word out, I got several signatures in the neighborhood from a majority of registered Hermosa Beach residents. Please drop this action, but if you must do anything, a TRAFFIC STUDY IS IN ORDER AND A PUBLIC HEARING on the matter. The neighbors are counting on you to consider our interests. Steve A. Crecy attachment: 3 page petition SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION IU PETITION To: City Council, City of Hermosa Beach As a resident of the immediate area, and as one who would be adversely affected by the proposed action, I STRONGLY OPPOSE any attempt to remove STOP signs from their present location along Prospect Avenue at Second Street and opposite of First Place. I also OPPOSE the installation of a STOP sign at Massey and Prospect avenue. I also request a Public Hearing and Public Notice regarding these proposed changes. NAME 1F14/4� ADDRESS SIGNATURE & DATE MiC3 S',C0?-40 P611-74 ,,d c,r J44/45- Stets - T' �/ i. Jo'? er3 J/YOs. iii D51 /2/7.g--"•'...57;- /02,3/ /d23 74 c157- 1163 1�A1- 1/ ‘-14 Lei/I1 L'1�, PETITION To: City Council, City of Hermosa Beach As a resident of the immediate area, and as one who would be adversely affected by the proposed action, I STRONGLY OPPOSE any attempt to remove STOP signs from their present location along Prospect Avenue at Second Street and opposite of First Place. I also OPPOSE the installation of a STOP sign at Massey and Prospect avenue. I also request a Public Hearing and Public Notice regarding these proposed changes. NAME L 1'�rn/N//4- (h4RC,l45 Rpt- R. Al OR td441Z-K kaV-hleei ,e•e[1 Totpiek..--014v,i;e4- +bcua ADDRESS /I 17- e'Sf 1/13 f11•e A/7-AciiirGt/�v� " SIGNATURE & DATE ,4ie r=l/irrypIc, �F-6`t6 Vallc42- N - 6 -P4 Apti Hollotdai A 1141e-r-t,41--6›- zWtq 40/6/,, U4 $C404 s�, t:a, 4116/ 12.0). ?-Y-4 // / �/ b aa. /4/bit) (m8 2c)2.. f(ou.c- c,t{2, luAv4 &TAD r -G (1-6-9-ts PETITION To: City Council, City of Hermosa Beach As a resident of the immediate area, and as one who would be adversely affected by the proposed action, I STRONGLY OPPOSE any attempt to remove STOP signs from their present location along Prospect Avenue at Second Street and opposite of First Place. I also OPPOSE the installation of a STOP sign at Massey and Prospect avenue. I also request a Public Hearing and Public Notice regarding these proposed changes. NAMEADDRESS SIGNATURE & DATE A . ,Sc,y1E�td fi` IepS ec-1 Ave- r e1 1U� Presp.6f Avt_ /_26-70-i4," 7,c &* 1.4)7G - a_ araattldt gao 214 P4.9 4 / 1130g, -it,. rtfSltAt 41 411(9 1� �� Ill ��� 111 4 � fir � a — )(Pr 5r 424/1-1t°o z -d otio��'2 X 15 0 �S-r- , 0.6 S�- March 28, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 CROSSING GUARD PROGRAM Purpose: To provide information on the subject program and approve additional appropriation to run through the remainder of this school year. Background: This program was last before you on November 28, 1995. The City Council action was to have a subcommittee meet with School District representatives and determine what steps, if any, might be jointly undertaken to fund the program. The subcommittee met once and learned that the School District was not able to provide direct financial assistance for the program. The City Council adopted a resolution stating that the program would be funded through the 2% UUT increase on the March ballot. As a result of the failure of Proposition F, the City Council must decide the future funding of the program or whether or not the program will continue. Options were presented at the November 28, 1995 meeting and several are repeated below: 1. Fund the program from the City General Fund 2. Explore the use of volunteers in school district 3. Explore private fund raising such as the Education Foundation, PTO, etc. 4. Develop a combination program of volunteers/private funding, etc. coordinated by the City and School District 5. Drop the program after some reasonable notice It is suggested that the subcommittee work on this after the City Council provides some general direction as to which of the above options you would like them to pursue. The City Council also needs to appropriate additional funds in the amount of $30,000 from Prospective Expenditures to run the program for the rest of the school year. This will provide time so that the options can be explored and presented for your review and approval. 1l Recommendation: 1. Approve appropriation of $30,000 to the Crossing Guard Program to fund the program for the remainder of the school year. 2. Provide general direction on the future of the Crossing Guard Program and instruct the subcommittee to report back by the May 14, 1996 City Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. urrell City Manager April 4, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1996 SUBJECT: USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ALONG BEACH DR./WALK STREETS SURVEY AND ISSUES INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO EXAMINE THE CURRENT USE OF UNUSED PUBLIC -RIGHT-OF-WAY AND IDENTIFY THE RELATED ISSUES Recommendation Direct staff as deemed appropriate Background A legal settlement has been recently reached between the property owners and the City concerning use of the public right-of-way along the west side of Beach Drive and the walk - streets. At the meeting of March 12, 1996, the City Council approved an ordinance adding an open space overlay zone to implement the settlement agreement and directed staff to identify issues in connection with properties east of Beach Drive. Analysis A survey has been attached denoting the use of the subject right-of-way. According to the survey, 15 lots east of Beach Drive use the public right of way for parking out of a total of 82 lots along the east side of Beach Drive. Issues related to the use of the subject property for parking include: • Most property owners along walkstreets regard the area as front yard to be used for hardscape and landscaping, unlike the west side of Beach Drive. which is perceived in part as the side yard or rear yard off an alley to be used as parking. • Screening the east side of the property right-of-way areas being used for parking may block ocean views from the easterly properties. 1 • The narrow lot width and depth limits the opportunity to utilize these areas for both parking and landscaping, similar to the settlement on the west side. (Lots are typically 30 feet in width and parking will consume 18 feet to 20 feet for parking stall depth.) • Many of these areas have historically been used for parking and in some cases provides the only available parking for the abutting property. CONCUR: Sol Blumenfe',d, Director Community Taevelopment Department Stephen R. Burrell City Manager ebchdr Z Planning Director There is a total of 251 lots that face or have trontage on Beach Drive. A minor number of those lots have fenced off the public right-of-way and use that land as a part of their own property. Only a few of these adjacent property owners have a City permit to use the public land. Most of the property owners do not have permission from the City or insurance that protects the City from claims that could occur from within the enclosed public right-of-way. PROPERTIES AFFECTED BY EXISTING ILLEGAL PARKING ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE 1. Number of lots along the east side of Beach Drive. 82 2. Number of lots along the east side of Beach Drive that do not park on the public right-of-way. (81.7%) 3. Number of lots along the east side of Beach Drive that use the public right-of-way for parking. (18.3%) 4. Number of lots along the Strand. 5. Number of lots along the Strand that do not park on the public right-of-way (82.8%) 6. Number of lots along the Strand that use the public right-of-way for parking. (17.2%) 7. Total number of lots along Beach Drive. 8. Total number of lots along Beach Drive that do not park on the public right-of-way. (82.5%) 9. Total number of lots along Beach Drive that park on the public right-of-way. (17.5%) 169 251 67 140 207 15 29 44 TABLE "A" 3 ILLEGAL VEHICLE PARKING ALONG BEACH DRIVE (Locations on Public Right-of-way Where Parking is Taking Place) No. Intersection S.W. Corner N.W. S.E. Corner Corner N.E. Corner 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1st St. 3rd " 4th " 5th " 6th " & " " " " Beach Drive " " " " " " " it Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No 6. 7th " " " " Yes Yes No No 7. 8th " " " It No Yes Yes No 8. 9th " " it " Yes Yes No No 9. 16th " " " " Yes Yes Yes No 10. 17th " " " " Yes No Yes No 11. 18th " " " " Yes Yes Yes No 12. 19th " " " " Yes Yes Yes No 13-. 20th " " " " Yes Yes No No 14. 21th " " " " Yes Yes Yes No 15. 23rd " " " " Yes Yes Yes No 16. 24th " " " " Yes Yes Yes Yes TOTALS Parking taking place Parking not taking place (44) (20) 14 2 TABLE "B" 4 15 1 11 4 5 12 r r April4, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE/LOWER PIER AVENUE CONSTRUCTION Recommendation: 1. That the City Council direct staff to review and develop alternatives for City Council consideration at the April 23, 1996 meeting; 2. Pier Reconstruction subcommittee meet to provide input; and, 3. That the decision on the IBI proposal to provide design services be considered at the April 23, 1996 meeting. Background: The City Council directed staff to return with the IBI design contract for lower Pier Avenue at this meeting. The decision to award the contract was postponed from January in order to know the outcome of Measure F. In order to provide the City Council with a range of alternatives to consider before deciding on the design contract, additional time is needed to develop these alternatives. It would also be appropriate for the Pier Reconstruction subcommittee to meet and provide input to the process. Hopefully, it will be possible to present the City Council with a recommendation at the April 23, 1996 meeting. IBI is aware that we need additional time before awarding the contract and remain available to perform the design work once the City Council has had an opportunity to consider a revised plan. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 73 January 16, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council January 23, 1996 Downtown Streetscape Lower Pier Avenue Construction Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Award a contract for preparation of construction documents and specification for the Lower Pier Avenue to IBI Group in the amount of $141,762. 2. Appropriate $152,000 from the Downtown Enhancement Commission Fund to CIP # 96-152. 3. Reject all other proposals. Background: The Hermosa Beach City Council, acting upon the recommendation of the Downtown Enhancement Commission(DEC), awarded a contract to the firm IBI Group for the preparation of the Downtown Implementation Plan. The Downtown Implementation Plan has been completed and approved by the City Council at their meeting of November 22, 1994. The original IBI's contract included the preparation of detailed construction documents for Lower Pier Avenue and Hermosa Avenue from Pier Avenue to 16th Street. However, after close examination of the tasks involved, preparation of the documents for the downtown could not have been accomplished for the price allocated. Several funding scenarios were also introduced to the City Council at various meetings since the completion of the Downtown Implementation Plan. It is determined that the funding to design phase one of the total Downtown Plan is now available. Staff proceeded with advertising and solicitirig proposals for the preparation of construction documents and specifications for the Downtqwn area. Six proposals were received on December 14, 1995. Analysis: Six proposals were received for the above project: 1. Barton Aschman $341,364 2. Greiner $160,560 3. Nolte and Associates $149,092 4. ASL $141,752 5. IBI Group $141,724 6. HLA $ 74,496 8 After careful review of the proposals, it has been determined that the IBI proposal is complete and provides all the necessary information to prepare construction documents and specification for the Lower Pier Avenue project. Some of the tasks involved are as follows: o Field investigation o Detailed survey at every 10 feet o Soils report o Pavement report o Select materials o Prepare planting and irrigation plan o Cost estimates o Sign Plan o Signing and Striping, traffic control, and phasing plan o Specifications o Construction drawings for street and storm drain o Traffic Signal Plan o Obtain approvals Funding: Expenses are as follows: IBI Contract Plan Check Contingency at 3% $141,724 $ 6,000 $ 4,250 Total $151,974 This project is funded by the Downtown Enhancement Commission Fund. The total available fund balance is approximately $423,796. Respectfully submitted: au&ii CwtLLyJ Amy Ami ani Director of Public Works For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance Concur: Stephen R. urrell City Manager • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April4, 1996 Regular Meeting April 9, 1996 Subject: Hermosa Inn Hotel EIR Contract for Consulting Services Recommendation: 1. Approve award of contract for the preparation and processing of an Environmental Impact Report in connection with the Hermosa Inn Hotel Project 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney 3. Authorize the Director of Community Development to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council, upon completion of work. 4. Authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes to the scope of work as necessary Background: The City has accepted an application from Keenan Land Development to process an application to develop a 97 room hotel on the Strand between 13th Street and 14th Street. The impacts upon the local neighborhood and upon the immediate coastal environment need to be addressed through the environmental review process in order to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City needs a qualified consultant to examine the impacts of the proposed development and to prescribe mitigation measures as required. The consultant scope of work is attached. Analysis: On January 11, 1996 the City issued a Request for Proposals (attached) to select a qualified consultant to prepare the environmental documentation for the hotel project. Thirteen proposals were received and five firms were invited to be interviewed as part of the final selection . EIP was selected to prepare the environmental documents. The selected firm had the broadest experience with hotel coastal projects and submitted a proposal which best addressed the issues identified in the RFP. The total project cost is estimated to be $68,140. The project is anticipated to be completed over a six month period with public hearings commencing by mid -summer. 1i 4 Fiscal Impact: The consulting services will be paid for by Keenan Land Development as part of the project review process. Keenan Land Development has remitted payment for preparing and processing the project EIR. The funds were credited to a deposit account and all payment to the environmental consultant will be paid from this account. rWi o : umenfe • , 'rector Community velopment Department Concur: Stephen R. Burrell City Manager Attachments: 1. Scope of Work Noted for Fiscal Impact Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department WORK PROGRAM EIP Associates' proposed work program presents a process which will result in the preparation of an adequate, accurate, and complete EIR pursuant to State law, the CEQA Guidelines, and City of Hermosa Beach CEQA Guidelines. The EIR will address the environmental effects of the project in proportion to their severity and probability of occurrence, concentrating on areas of special concern identified in the Initial Study, in the EIR scoping meeting, and in responses to the Notice of Preparation. The EIR will provide full disclosure of all the significant effects of the proposed project. The work program provides an analytical framework to accurately and completely assess the environmental effects of the proposed project. For each impact, the EIR will clearly identify the level of significance of that impact. Impacts will be identified as significant, significant and unavoidable, or less than significant. Mitigation measures will be identified where required for all identified impacts. The traffic study prepared by LL&G will form the basis for the discussions of the following issues in the EIR: traffic, parking, air quality, and noise. The EIR will be throughly edited to ensure straightforward communication. Maps, drawings, and photographs will be provided in a consistent format throughout the report. They will clearly and accurately depict the project and its alternatives, graphically display environmental data, and support the discussion of impacts and mitigation measures for the proposed project. The following describes EIP's proposed work tasks to complete the preparation of the EIR for the proposed Hermosa Beach Inn project. TASK 1: EIR INITIATION MEETINGS EIP's project director and project manager will attend a series of meetings with City staff early in the process to clarify expectations, refine the work plan, exchange information, and present specifics on our recommended approach to the project. Following the scoping meeting, the concerns of the City, interested and responsible agencies, and the public will be discussed to ensure that all relevant issues are clearly defined at the outset and are addressed in the EIR. Concurrence will be reached on the project description, alternatives, and the need for any additional technical studies. 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR 7 The project budget and schedule will be discussed and refined, if necessary, to reflect agreements and understandings reached in these meetings. Based on the outcome of these meetings, EIP will prepare a refined EIR schedule, identifying critical data needs and associated delivery dates necessary to attain the agreed upon schedule. Products • Definition of the Project and Alternatives • Refined Scope of Work (if needed) • Refined Budget (if needed) • Refined Schedule (if needed) TASK 2: ENVIRONMENTAL DATA COLLECTION The EIP team will collect and develop necessary data for use in the environmental analysis. This will include a review of existing information sources including the City's general plan, municipal codes, and the local coastal plan. A field review of the site and surrounding areas will be conducted in order to survey land uses and document existing conditions. A range of existing environmental and planning documents developed and published by local and regional jurisdictions will be reviewed, including, but not limited to: • City of Hermosa Beach General Plan Elements • City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code • The Local Coastal Plan • 1994 Downtown Improvement Plan Final Report, October 1994 • Downtown Improvement Plan Parking & Circulation Study (pending) • The Hotel EIR for the Biltmore Site, PBR, 1984 • The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook 1993 • Los Angeles County CMP • Regional Mobility Element Other relevant documents which become known and available to the EIP project team will be reviewed and relevant information will be incorporated into the EIR. Any deficiencies in these studies and the need for any additional studies will be identified as part of this task. As part of this task, EIP will also consult with responsible agencies, including the Coastal Commission, and community or business groups as appropriate to clarify concerns they may have with the project. 8 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR Product • Existing environmental baseline data TASK 3: PREPARATION OF INITIAL STUDY/NOP EIP Associates, will complete an Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (NOP) which will include a complete project description. EIP will also assist in the development of a mailing list and will circulate the NOP to the appropriate citizens, agencies and the State Clearinghouse. Products • Initial Study/Notice of Preparation TASK 4: CONDUCT EIR SCOPING MEETING Clearly, the issues and concerns identified in the scoping meeting, during early consultation with responsible agencies, and in responses to the NOP will need to be carefully considered. How these issues are addressed in the EIR will strongly influence the success of the environmental process and how the document is received by the public. For these reasons it is essential that the scoping meeting before the Environmental Review Committee take advantage of an important opportunity for the public to help identify issues and focus the scope of the EIR. EIP Associates will coordinate with staff in preparing for, noticing, and conducting a public scoping meeting for the EIR. A meeting agenda, handouts, and comment sheets will be prepared by EIP with input from City staff EIP will explain the basics of The California Environmental Quality Act and the purpose of the EIR process to the public. The project site and project proposal will be described with the use of slides and other visual aids. The presentation will be concise , with the true focus of the meeting being on receiving and facilitating public input on what issues they feel should be addressed in the EIR. Following the meeting, EIP will summarize public comments recorded and collected from participant comment sheets. The summary will be provided to City staff and will be carefully considered by EIP and LL&G during preparation of the EIR. TASK 5: PREPARATION OF SCREENCHECK DRAFT EIR The EIP team will prepare the Screencheck Draft EIR (SDEIR) in accordance with CEQA and City regulations and guidelines. Each section of the report will address all statutory requirements of CEQA. The EIR will include an introduction, project description, summary, setting, impacts, thresholds of significance and mitigation 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR 9 measures for each of the environmental issues, a discussion of alternatives and other statutory requirements, and a complete list of authors responsible for the environmental analysis. Thresholds of significance will be provided in each issue section of the EIR preceding the impact analysis. Early in the process EIP will provide the City with recommended thresholds of significance and will work with the City to ensure that the standards or thresholds are pertinent to the project and appropriate for addressing issues in the City of Hermosa Beach. The impact analyses developed by EIP will differentiate between the site-specific effects of the project and the cumulative effects associated with the project. The analysis will also identify impacts associated with individual phases of the proposed project which may differ from build -out. The ER will discuss impacts associated with the identified alternatives in a separate chapter of the EIR. Mitigation measures that are proposed by the various responsible agencies will be differentiated from mitigation measures recommended by the preparers of the EIR. Existing City regulations and policies that off -set project impacts will be clearly discussed in the setting section and considered prior to determining the significance of impacts. For each impact, the level of significance following mitigation will be called out. The cumulative impacts will be specified as to their degree of severity in individual sections of the E1R, cross-referenced where required between sections, and summarized in a separate section of the document. The summary will be prepared in a fashion that is easily adaptable for use by the City in adopting findings and preparing the Mitigation Monitoring Program. As part of the overall data collection effort undertaken during the preparation of the SDEIR, EIP will identify the range of permits from regulatory agencies that will be required through build -out. EIP will summarize the required permits, and the approximate timing of any required permits in the appropriate technical sections. A discussion of the methodologies and approach for the analysis of each of the environmental topics in the SDEIR is presented in the next section of this proposal (beginning on Page 15). If requested by the City, EIP can submit individual sections of the SDEIR as they are prepared. Following review by the City, E1P will meet with City staff to discuss any necessary modifications to the SDEIR. EIP will then revise the SDEIR based on direction received from staff and will produce the Draft ER. 10 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EiR Products • Four (6) copies of the Screencheck Draft EIR TASK 6: PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT EIR After completion of the City's review of the SDEIR, EIP will prepare the Draft EIR. Ten (10) copies of the Draft EIR (DEIR) along with a Notice of Completion will then be submitted by EIP to the State Clearinghouse, initiating the 45 -day public comment period. EIP will assist staff as needed to ensure that the necessary notices announcing the public hearings and the availability of documents are prepared and published in a major local newspaper serving the study area. EIP will be responsible for mailing copies of the DEIR to responsible and interested agencies. Up to fifty (50) copies of the DEIR will be produced and circulated by EIP. Any additional copies desired by the City can be provided for an additional cost. The estimated cost of the DEIR is $40.00 per document. Products • Fifty (50) copies of the DEIR • Notice of Completion TASK 7: PREPARATION OF DRAFT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS After the close of the public comment period, the EIP team will prepare written responses to the comments on the Draft EIR received during the public review period. Six (6) copies of the draft responses will be submitted for review and comment by the City. EIP will also submit a draft copy of the Mitigation Monitoring Program for review. The Mitigation Monitoring Program can be included as part of the Final EIR or prepared as a separate document from the EIR. Products • Six (6) copies of the draft Responses to Comments • Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program TASK 8: PREPARATION OF THE FINAL EIR The EIP project manager will meet with City staff to discuss preparation of the Final EIR (FEIR) package. The Final EIR will include all of the information contained 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR 11 in the Draft EIR, along with revisions and changes to the document in bold and strike -out where needed to address comments received during the public circulation period. . • asuros as rov�scd from the DETR, The FEIR will also include a chapter with comment letters and corresponding responses, and a mitigation monitoring program. Upon receipt of direction from City staff, EIP will prepare the Final EIR document for submittal to the City. ... • . , . . .. .1 . 1 • • Thirty (30) copies of the FEIR will be delivered by EIP. Additional copies of the FEIR and Mitigation Monitoring Program could be provided for an additional estimated cost of $35.00. Products • Thirty (30) copies of the Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring Program TASK 9: PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE EIR The EIP team will be available to attend necessary public hearings on the EIR. EIP will work with City staff to select appropriate dates convenient to the public and agencies involved. EIP will also assist in arranging presentations of the EIR. EIP will be prepared to respond to questions, make presentations, and/or participate in an advisory capacity at the hearings. In total, members of the EIP team will attend up to four (4) public hearings related to the EIR. The per meeting cost for attendance at additional public hearings is provided in the Cost Estimate section of this proposal. Products • Attendance at up to four (4) public hearings TASK 10: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION The EIP project team, through coordination with City staff at the beginning of the project, will compile a list of all potentially involved departments and agencies. During the course of the environmental analysis, EIP will assume responsibility for coordinating with these respective agencies. Thus, the environmental analysis will incorporate all the appropriate department and agency input in order to expedite the process of environmental certification and approval. EIP's project manager will maintain routine contact with the City's project manager, and will attend regular coordination meetings and prepare monthly progress reports. 12 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR EIP's project manager will be responsible for coordination of all team members with appropriate City staff and for the quality of all work products. Where appropriate, EIP will utilize the expertise of City staff to confirm assumptions and methodologies, to provide input in formulating key mitigation measures, and to verify major conclusions. Products • Up to five (5) coordination meetings with City staff • Monthly status reports 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR 13 14 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR ANALYSIS OF KEY ISSUES Traffic, Circulation, & Parking The traffic, circulation, and parking study conducted by Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LL&G) will serve as the basis for the EIR analysis of these issues. EIP will work with LL&G to ensure that the information, impacts, mitigation measures, and conclusions presented in the EIR Traffic/Circulation/Parking section are clear and consistent with the technical conclusions presented in their study. EIP will strive to present the information in a format that is understandable to the layperson. The traffic circulation and parking study will be included in the EIR as a technical appendix. The specific scope of work for the study is as follows: Project Mobilization • Meet with project team members to discuss project, work schedule, and obtain a confirmed project description to be evaluated in the EIR traffic study. Discuss assumptions to be used in EIR. • Meet with downtown improvement plan parking and circulation study consultants. • Meet with City staff to confirm the approach to the study, precisely define the analysis criteria, and attend the Scoping Meeting conducted by EIP Associates. • Visit the site to reacquaint ourselves with the specifics of the property and inventory the existing traffic conditions on Pier Avenue, Hermosa Avenue and the three intersections studies in LL&G's previous work, and other streets in the vicinity of the site. Inspect key roadways and three intersections with respect to lane configuration, geometry and intersection control. Project Evaluation and Mitigation Measure Analysis • Determine and present in tabular and/or graphic form a traffic generation forecast for the proposed development on a daily and peak hour basis. The forecasts will be based on the trip generation rates found in the 5th Edition of ITE's Trip Generation Manual. 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR IS • Distribute and assign project traffic to the streets serving the project site, taking into account downtown improvement plan parking and circulation study recommendations. • Evaluate the peak hour traffic impacts of the project at key signalized intersections. Evaluation of potential project traffic impacts will be made relative to the short-term and long-term background traffic conditions based on the City of Hermosa Beach guidelines for determining significant impacts. • Prepare analysis of parking demand generated by the project on both a City Code and rational demand analysis, taking into account the various hotel components. Determine supply -demand relationship for the first phase of development and for the total hotel development. • Based on this assessment, determine which intersections (if any) will require improvements to mitigate the impacts due to the proposed project and achieve satisfactory Service Levels. Mitigation may include such measures as signalization improvements, striping modifications, the addition of auxiliary turning lanes, and traffic control/limitations at site access points. Preparation of Screencheck and Draft EIR Traffic Study • Prepare a Screencheck Traffic Report which details all of the above mentioned items, the analysis, findings and conclusions. The screencheck report will be suitably documented with tabular, graphic and appendix materials. Copies will be submitted to EIP and the City for review. • If necessary, update screencheck report based on comments and submit the traffic study for inclusion in the DEIR. Response to Comments and Final FIR Traffic Study • Prepare and submit draft written responses to comments received on the Traffic Section of the DEIR during the public review process. Update the responses, if necessary based on City and/or public comments and submit final draft for inclusion in the Final EIR. Meeting Support • LL&G will attend a total of two (2) project coordination meetings with EIP and/or City staff, and will prepare for and attend a total of two (2) public hearings with the City of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission and City Council. This component includes preparation of specific presentation materials on traffic issues as needed. 16 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR Air Quality • A description of the climate and meteorology of the project area will be prepared, and the current air quality guidelines and policies for the City of Hermosa Beach and State of California will be summarized. A description of the historical air quality data from the closest air monitoring stations to the project will be prepared. A description and comparison of the current EPA, California Air Resources Board (CARB), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) plans to attain and maintain the state and federal air quality standards will be presented. • Significance standards derived from federal, state and local policies and set forth in the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook will be clearly presented. • Carbon monoxide "Hot -spot" modeling will be performed. Carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations would be predicted at up to three key intersections for up to two alternatives using CALINE4, the fourth generation California Line Source Dispersion Model. Intersection signalization, traffic data, meteorology, street network geometrics, site data, and emission generation rates information will be needed for the modeling. Most of this information will be provided by the traffic study, SCAQMD, and the CARB. • Regional emissions generated by vehicular traffic will be calculated. Regional motor vehicle emissions ofNO„ CO, reactive organic compounds (ROC), and PM10 will be estimated based on information provided in the traffic study. Methodology set forth in the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook will be used. Daily project emissions will be compared with identified significance standards. • Operational emissions resulting from electricity and natural gas usage will be calculated based on project information provided included in the specific plan. The methodology for this analysis will be based on the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook and daily project emissions will be compared with SCAQMD significance thresholds. • Qualitative estimates of building, utility pipeline, and roadway construction impacts due to equipment exhaust and fugitive dust will be made. New sources of PMI° emissions from construction equipment will be identified. • A discussion of the cumulative effects of the project in conjunction with other local and regional projects on regional air quality and the Air Quality Management Plan will be prepared. 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR 17 • Air quality mitigation measures for the project will be identified if state or federal air quality standards are exceeded. Mitigation measures will be proposed in accordance with SCAQMD rules and requirements. Possible mitigation measures include TDM and other traffic reduction measures. Noise Because the project site is located adjacent to an existing residential neighborhood and a public beach and park that will be affected by temporary construction noise, increases in surface traffic noise following project construction, and by operational aspects of the proposed hotel, it is recommended that the following analysis be conducted. Project traffic information will be utilized to address potential noise impacts and the proposed mitigation measures. The following subtasks will be completed for this analysis: • EIP will identify existing sensitive receptors (such as residences, recreationalists and nearby residents) and will discuss noise fundamentals, noise assessment criteria, and existing noise levels determined by modeling existing traffic. • EIP will identify and discuss relevant federal, state and local noise regulations in order to provide a regulatory framework for the noise analysis. • City and state requirements relating to noise will be analyzed, and the concerns of adjacent residents and property owners will be considered in determining standards of significance for different land uses. Significance standards for the EIR will be clearly presented based on this analysis and will be presented to staff for review early in the process. • Roadway noise impacts will be analyzed. Vehicular noise impacts would be estimated using the model SOUND32. SOUND32 is a Federal Highway Administration Level 2 Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108). Analysis will be performed for up to 5 roadway links for up to three alternatives. Traffic data (specifically ADT link volumes), street network geometrics, and site data information will be needed for the modeling. This information will be provided in the project traffic study. From the output, the distances from the centerline of a roadway link to the significant Ldn contours will be presented in tabular form for each scenario. 18 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR • Construction noise impacts will be discussed qualitatively. This will include a discussion of typical noise levels associated with various phases of construction. As construction equipment is the primary source of construction noise, noise levels of typical construction equipment will be presented. The timing of construction and potential effects on beach and park users and nearby residents and businesses will be carefully assessed. • An analysis of the project impacts and a discussion of the effects of the project and cumulative development on the surrounding area will be prepared in light of the identified significance standards. • Operational aspects of the proposed project that could result in noise levels that could present a nuisance to adjacent residential and recreational uses (i.e. delivery and service areas) will be qualitatively discussed. • Where significant impacts are identified, noise mitigation measures for the project will be developed to offset any adverse impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed project to the degree feasible. Land Use and Planning As proposed, the project is consistent with existing zoning and the City of Hermosa Beach General Plan. The only conformity issue known at this time focuses on the applicants proposal for roof -top structures (a trellis, railing, and chimneys), the height of which exceed the basic 30 foot height limit that applies to the project. The land use analysis will evaluate this issue and will also focus on the compatibility of the hotel use with adjacent residential and recreational uses. As previously mentioned, the City of Hermosa Beach recently completed a Downtown Improvement Plan. The land use analysis will include a review of the project for consistency with the goals and intent of the plan. To address these issues, the Land Use section of the EIR will include the following information: • The land use context for the project will be established by surveying the area and providing maps and descriptions of current land uses in the project area. • Land use impacts related to the change in intensity of land uses caused by the project will be described. Land use changes associated with the proposed project as well as cumulative projects will be discussed in relation to existing land uses and current policies. This will include a discussion and analysis of plans for the improvement of the downtown area. 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn F1R 19 • The proposed hotel project will be compared and evaluated for conformance with the policies and regulations of the City of Hermosa Beach General Plan and the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. In addition to the issue surrounding building height, it will be necessary to compare the project against other applicable standards set forth in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. • As part of the land use analysis, the characteristics of the project site and surrounding beach area and residential neighborhood will be described and the changes associated with implementation of the proposed hotel will be evaluated. Land use compatibility issues will be examined in order to help determine the appropriateness of the project, its various components (meeting room and rooftop uses) and development intensity (height, scale). Particular attention will be given to the relationship of the proposed hotel use and its operational characteristics, to beach and Strand recreational uses, and to adjacent and nearby residential uses. • Where significant effects are identified, specific mitigation measures will be proposed to achieve land use compatibility and conformance with applicable land use policies. Aesthetics and Views The project site, which is currently vacant, is located along the most heavily used section of the coastline in the City. The hotel would be visible from the Hermosa Beach Pier, from the beach and volleyball tournament area, and would also figure prominently in views from an adjacent public park and from bicyclists and pedestrians traveling along The Strand. Because the site is currently vacant, the hotel would also block partial ocean views from nearby residential properties, from areas of the adjacent park, and from a section of Hermosa Avenue. The project has some potential to create objectional views, and result in development scale and massing that is out of character with the area. The overall approach to the evaluation of views will emphasize the use of graphics, photographs, and computer simulation to communicate the potential visual effects of the project in a manner that will focus the issues and make then understandable to the public and decision makers. It is assumed that the visual exhibits in the document will be critical to the public participation process and to the development of appropriate mitigation measures. The specific components of the analysis are outlined below: • A textual description will be provided of existing visual conditions and the visual/aesthetic relationship of the site to the surrounding coastal environment, 20 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR including the beach, The Strand, the Pier, the adjacent public park, and adjacent and nearby residential uses. • Using photo -reconnaissance techniques, an analysis will be conducted of views to the project site from key vantage points. Photo exhibits, keyed to a map, will be included in the text of the analysis to clearly demonstrate the most significant existing views to the site and the relationship of the site to adjacent development and beach, pier, and park recreational uses. • A description of project plans will be provided focusing on building height, scale and massing, landscaping plans, the location of loading, service, and equipment areas, and the buildings interface with adjacent properties and public spaces. Building elevations, site plans and sections will be included in the document and will be specifically referenced in the discussion. • Evaluation of the project site plan, elevations, and landscape plans, for general conformance with any City design related policies and guidelines, including any found in the Downtown Improvement Plan. Clear inconsistencies with City design policies and guidelines would be considered significant impacts. • EIP will enlist the services of Threshold Designs & Computer Imaging to create a three-dimensional computer model of the proposed project as it would appear in the context of surrounding properties and public spaces. The model shows a computer enhanced rendering of the project set within a photograph of the surrounding area. This computer model will be used to gauge the visual effects of the proposed project, including building scale and massing, relationship to the adjoining properties, and building appearance from the municipal pier, The Strand and the beach area. By creating a computer model rather than rendering specific views of the project, views of the project can be generated from multiple vantage points in order to focus in on areas of concern and produce a more complete visual representation of the project. The cost to construct the computer model is primarily a function of the level of detail incorporated into the model. For the purposes of this proposal, a basic model of the project is assumed which indicates building forms with limited architectural and site details and some landscaping. Views from six two vantage points are assumed and will be agreed upon in consultation with City staff. A cost per view estimate is provided with a startup fee. Addition views, models of alternative designs, and additional detail, in terms of architectural features, building materials, landscaping, and colors, would remain an option and could readily be produced if ultimately desired. . 272.9S Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR 21 • Significant view impacts will be identified and fully described based on a review of proposed plans, sections, and computer generated images. Views that are eliminated and structures or development open to public view that is aesthetically offensive or out of scale or character with adjacent residential and recreational areas will be considered significant impacts. • Mitigation measures may be needed to reduce the level of significant aesthetic impacts. Such measures could include recommend changes or requirements for the design of the project focusing on: the planting and landscape plan and screening of views, changes in building height, setbacks, or the modulation of structures. Hydrology (drainage and water quality) • EIP will describe existing hydrologic conditions based on review of existing technical reports and drainage studies that apply to the area and discussions with City staff. The setting section will describe existing site conditions in relation to the regional hydrological system, including drainage patterns, existing storm drainage and flood control systems, groundwater resources and surface and groundwater quality. • EIP will discuss relevant water quality regulations including but not limited to, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements for construction activities and operational activities. • Impacts related to groundwater and groundwater and surface water quality will be evaluated. Depth to groundwater will be identified to based on existing information and the potential for encountering groundwater and associated hazards will be identified. A qualitative analysis of water quality impacts to receiving waters generated during both construction and operation of the proposed project site will also be conducted. Increases in runoff from existing to developed project conditions will be estimated, and the impact on local stormwater drainage systems will also be assessed based on available information. • Mitigation measures will be proposed for all identified significant impacts related to drainage, groundwater, and water quality. These measures could include, but would not be limited to, establishing performance standards for construction in the event dewatering is required, and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) for urban stormwater runoff that should be implemented to address construction and post construction impacts, and recommending measures for reducing runoff or improving existing stormwater drainage facilities.. 22 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR Public Services Police Protection Construction of the proposed hotel would increase demand on police services by bringing additional traffic and visitors into an area where the maintenance of public safety is particularly important. In order to address the increase in demand for police services with development of the project the following analysis will be provided: • EIP will review the effects of the project on the ability to provide police services to the project. This information will primarily be obtained through consultation with the Hermosa Beach Police Department. The Department's recommendations for mitigation will be incorporated into the EIR, as appropriate. • Based on information obtained from the Police Department, the locational aspect of the project site in relationship to existing patrols will be evaluated, as well as environmental site design features (i.e. parking structures) which may provide additional security or pose security risks. Fire Protection The project will increase demand on fire prevention and protection services and could require additional staff and equipment. Development of the project could also raise issues related to Fire Department response times and emergency access to the project site, The Strand, and adjacent properties. To ensure the provision of adequate fire protection services for the project the following analysis will be conducted: • EIP will review the effects of the project on the ability to provide fire protection services to the project site. Vehicular access to the site and circulation design will be evaluated in consultation with the Fire Department to ensure emergency vehicle access for emergency evacuation and fire suppression. The Fire Department will be consulted and their recommendations for mitigation will be incorporated into the EIR as appropriate. • In conjunction with the Fire Department, the required fire flow to the project site will be determined and any deficiencies in fire flows will be identified. 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR 23 Utilities Wastewater The discussion of wastewater will focus on: identifying any known capacity constraints in the wastewater conveyance and treatment system, estimating project wastewater flows, and proposing mitigation if required to help ensure that project flows can be accommodated. ■ Based on existing available information, the location and size of local sewer lines will be indicated in the EIR. The route for wastewater to be conveyed from the site to major sewer trunks and on to the treatment plant will be described. Known or suspected capacity problems or constraints in the local sewer system will be described. • The plant(s) which will treat wastewater generated from the site will be identified and the current treatment capacity of that plant will be indicated in the EIR. Any plans for expansion of the treatment plant will also be indicated. ■ The amount of wastewater generated from future development at the site will be estimated. The ability of local sewer lines and trunk lines to convey wastewater from the site and the availability of necessary capacity to treat the additional wastewater will be evaluated based on available information. Mitigation measures if required, will be based on the recommendations of City planning and engineering staff. Water Supply ■ The ETR will identify the water purveyor which serves the project site and that purveyor will be contacted for information on water supplies, water quality, and the ability to serve anticipated development. ■ The EIR will identify the water distribution system serving the area, as well as any other noteworthy water facilities, and will indicate any existing plans for expansion or improvement of the system. • Anticipated water consumption of the future development in the project area will be estimated and any need for water improvements to serve the area will be indicated. Measures for water conservation in new development will be recommended, as necessary. If the City has applicable water conservation standards and requirements, they will be described and considered in the approach to mitigation. 24 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR Solid Waste • The EIR will identify the landfill currently serving the project area and will indicate the remaining capacity and expected life of the facility. Any plans for landfill expansion will also be indicated. • The EIR will project the amount of solid waste to be generated by the project. Requirements for collection, storage, transportation, and disposal of solid waste generated by the proposed project will be presented in the EIR. • The City's recycling program will be described and any additional measures will be discussed which would encourage the re -use and/or recycling of materials. Cumulative Impacts Impacts that are individually limited, but that may be cumulatively considerable, will be addressed in the EIR. The relationship of this project to other developments planned or proposed in the City and the project area will be discussed. These related projects may create impacts that become significant in their cumulative effects. Cumulative impacts will be discussed on a city-wide, and/or regional level, depending on the area influenced by the cumulative effect of the specific environmental issue. A cumulative projects list will be developed and will include: projects proposed and underway within the corporate limits of Hermosa Beach, and other regionally significant projects within the vicinity that would contribute to cumulatively significant effects. Statutory CEQA Topics In addition to the specific environmental impacts described above, the following general topics will be discussed as required by CEQA: • Growth -Inducing Impacts. The growth -inducing potential of the project will be addressed. Ways in which the proposed project could foster population or economic growth, either directly or indirectly, in the City will be discussed. The potential for this project to facilitate or encourage the development of adjoining or nearby land will also be addressed. • Irreversible Environmental Changes. Any irreversible environmental changes that would result from the implementation of the proposed project will be discussed, including the commitment of any non-renewable resources. • Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot Be Avoided If The Project is Implemented. In this section of the report, all adverse impacts, 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR 25 including those which can be reduced to an insignificant level but not eliminated, will be summarized. Where there are impacts that cannot be eliminated without imposing an alternative project design, their implications and the reasons why the project is being proposed notwithstanding their effect, will be discussed. Alternatives The analysis of alternatives is an important element of the EIR process. The selection and discussion of alternatives fosters informed decision-making and informed public participation by examining feasible project alternatives which may result in the avoidance or reduction of adverse impacts. Three alternatives will be evaluated including a "no project" alternative. The selection of alternatives, all of which will be developed to reduce identified significant effects, will be made in consultation with the City. The alternatives will be discussed in a separate chapter of the EIR. Mitigation Monitoring Program EIP will develop a Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) in conformance with City standards and state -mandated requirements. The MMP will establish City, agency and department responsibility for monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures and will describe the timing/frequency of both monitoring and reporting. The MMP will be organized in table format and mitigation measures will be identified according to impact category and numbered for ease of reference. 26 272.95 Proposal for the Hermosa Beach Inn EIR April 3, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 LETTER FROM ROGER BACON REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE AMOUNT OF TIME BANNERS CAN BE DISPLAYED ON COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS Recommendation: That the City Council determine whether or not you wish to initiate a change in the code to allow longer periods of time for display of banners. Background: Mr. Bacon has requested permission to display one or two banners at Ralphs on a regular basis. The code presently allows banners up to 100 sq. ft. to be displayed for up to 60 days per calendar year (Section 13.5-21 of the Zoning Code). A copy of Mr. Bacon's letter is attached. Enforcement of banners that have been installed without a permit or that are displayed longer than 60 days is done on a complaint only basis. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 15 rr ILL Nu. mar Ute ,'Jo t . U1 Roger Bacon 1100 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Fax. # 310-372-6186 March 5, 1996 Steve Burrell City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Steve, The majority of Ralphs Grocery Co. individual super markets all have banners on their store fronts that presently say "Double Coupons" and "Open 24 Hours". I feel that in order for us to be competive in the supermarket business we should be able to utilize the same banner in Hermosa Beach. Please reply to this request upon receipt. Sincerely, RECEIVED MAR 1 1 1996 PLANNING DEPT. April 2, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1996 Subject: Recommendation to Retain General Contractor and Vendor to Complete City Hall First Floor Office Remodel Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Award contract to Westcon Enterprises Inc., a General Contracting Firm to complete the first floor office remodel for the amount of $36,579 2. Award contract to Jules Seltzer Associates for Modular Walls and Workstations for the amount of $79,414 3. Appropriate $92,730 of UUT funds to cover remodel project costs 4. Authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes as necessary commensurate with budget and 10% contingency. Background: On July 17, 1995 the City Council approved a preliminary plan and appropriation of UUT funds ($34,862) for the costs to consolidate the planning and building functions of the Community Development Department in one location on the first floor of City Hall and to remodel the Finance Department as part of the remodel project. Staff prepared plans and bid specifications to proceed with the remodel. The project was advertised for bid in December and bids were received pursuant to the public bid process on February 8, 1996. The bids provide all labor and materials as required to complete the first floor City Hall office remodel which generally consists of demolition and installation of new acoustical ceiling, appurtenant electrical, plumbing , finishing of floor and wall surfaces and installation of modular walls, lateral files and workstations. Nineteen bidders responded to the request for bids and the lowest bidder was Westcon Enterprise of Victorville, California at $36,579. There was a wide disparity of bids. The bid for modular walls and workstations is provided by Jules Seltzer and Associates/ • Herman Miller and the Wall Center who are vendors obtained through the California Communities Purchasing Program sponsored by the League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties. Prices are based on Santa Clara County bids. The modular wall and workstation bid is $ 79,414. Analysis: Several plan alternatives were examined and the alternate of using modular walls and workstations was deemed to provide the most expeditious way to accomplish the remodel and the most flexibility to accommodate changes in staffing and new work demands. 16 The work will be completed over a nine day period including the evenings and Friday, Saturday and Sunday to minimize disruption to staff and the public during City Hall office hours.Public counters and cabinetry will be completed off-site and installed during weekends. Installation of modular walls and workstations will occur during the work week, but can be accomplished relatively quickly with staff relocating to workstations as they are completed, rather than waiting to occupy office spaces until the entire remodel project is complete. Although the per foot cost for modular walls and workstations is higher than constructing the walls and workstations, the modular system provides flexibility for relocation which cannot be obtained with framed construction and drywall. The systems are interchangeable and can be utilized in future remodeling work. The cost advantage with the modular systems appear with any subsequent changes to remodeled spaces as outlined below: Item Installed Move #1 Move #2 Moveable vs $100/1in.ft. $7.50 remove $15.00 move & install $122.50 total $ 22.50 move & install $144.50 total Permanent Drywall Construction $40.00/lin. ft. $30.00 demo/haul $40.00 rebuild & repair, paint $110 total Move #1 $70. demo, haul, rebuild, paint $180 total Thus there are net long term savings, less disruption and less delay with the modular systems which are installed over carpet and under ceilings and contain all wiring for telephones, computers, lighting and receptacles. Staff is proposing to commence with construction in May upon final contract approval. The project would be funded with UUT funds requested and previously appropriated. The balance in the UUT Fund as of 4/2/96 is $237,933. Sol lumenfel , D' ector Community D velopment Department Concur: Stephen R. B City Manager Attachments: 1. Certified Bid Log Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department (5) o CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- BID OPENING LOG SHEET Project Name: First Floor Office Remodel/Community Development Date: February 8, 1996 Page 1 of UEBI- Q DE.'jwP,iar . 9E5 1E5 (5,X49.°° LA t')ELTE A0Ai4eC, DEA) F_ oPMatOr -; yF$ LI 49 ANFtHr-iM Pi 4 F SEav1c.E C:p c )7‘5°r' $3) /04.°o -PAM nctkrr4 Pa Sptr,JGs G g M M 4 aot3,S r oc.it s (.i F. cfF-5 06 5A) +. — TitRzMJA' nPt61 thsLo0 (S EZ 3/ 6;, J 871. --- DES 11 RR COP,Wriquc-r ICA) 1 S y 'IEZ S 4.3 3Go. r,o Cui.vaR C,TIj M(:L 13ciLDES SA K-5 1E3 (03 $ 03.°° CAMOIQILLo AM E�4 Karl) Co,�L T ROCTto.) CI F-5 (i E. --5 b el g 7 $ t'O .9-5-' o . L./0x6sTER % J Ax cohlsTRUC-TION (iE.S s (p4) 1� . �° Epc(No LI)ESTcot3 tJTLRPRISE- Li f -S 1-tES co 4(o7CI+. .._. \il croft v t i..e. RCO COi3STROcr(OiJ 1J Es. rS 013t '7.Z '2s qq• —' Jc. 4o A OST tt-noiJ P C ] 0 E -s YES �- -r : nOO p n g , - 1) - I 1 "oRAIPNCE. Attest: Office of the City Clerk - 1315 Valley Drive - Hermosa : +, A 90254 bss\\ FFe o s 1996 1, z CRy� LERK H R BEACH 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -- BID OPENING LOG SHEET Proiect Name: First Floor Office Remodel/Community Development Date: February 8, 1996 Bid Bond Full Bid Page 2 of Amount of Bid GE1 BzsrROczfa) ES cE.s $9) 99T.o a CRRsok) K ti co aSTR o rio0 y (ES 13 1857. `- ooDLA.A.112 HIL44 Ci AR1. 'S Pic, -130R IdEy /c - E.5 _ po 113J 9 -- (jJ .sr Coy' uA- We.%F!ELD CoOST-RUC-r10>3 9 tops "E.s3) 0l6 °= ToA014Jc.S. M I DI -A-0 Cok,)sTR ucri ON s i E 9 es (og) 2 a • � M 4a NPrrr�k) 8 e-1 DTEC Co asTR v`.T1oL) ttss y ES 1f} ► g . , m HAwrrto RN E. S4CoasrRUcric) 'l Fs (fEs 4 9a) 947 Cw .vER Ctry n` .filt (.4 4,1 ,N, - ' \- \ J 0 8 1995. °:. 2 r' TY -T-1 (77 Attest: 41r3/4-- (U/ Office of the City Clerk -1315 Valley Drive - Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 1 March 28, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATION 1 Background: Ther are a number of bills being considered that would impact the property tax revenue that the City receives. These bills deal with the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund which was set up by the state to transfer City property tax to school districts to make up for the state's shortfall in funding. As property tax revenue has increased since the state first took the funds in 1992-93, the need for the transfer has become less. This is explained in some detail in the attached material from the League of California Cities. The following bills address the partial return of ERAF to local governments. Each of these is explained in the attachment: 1. AB2228 (Mazzoni) deals with special education costs statewide and specific limits in Marin and Mono counties. 2. AB2406 (Villaraigosa) would reinstate the 10% and 11% marginal personal income tax rates 1/1/96 and dedicate this additional revenue to the ERAF. 3. AB2797 (Aguiar) and SB 1865 (Craven) would limit the City contribution to the prior year. Any growth in property tax revenue would go to the City. 4. AB2828 (Sweeney) would allocate an unspecified amount of the state General Fund to partially repay local agencies for their contribution to ERAF. The League of California Cities is recommending that all City's take a strong stand in support of these bills. Recommendation: Review the bills and direct staff to prepare letters for the Mayor's signature indicating the City Council's support. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 1 1 e [SB 1865 (Craven) - Support] Hearing: Wednesday, April 10, Senate Local Government Committee City Support Needed to Prevent State Capturing More Property Tax!! All of the bills proposing to return ERAF to local agencies have been set for hearing right after the Easter break. Cities should contact the author of the bills, the committee members and the Governor as soon as possible indicating their support of these measures. It is very important that the committees hear from as many cities as possible regarding their support of these bills so that the bills can move out of these first committees. Cities should indicate that the reduced share of property taxes has worked as a disincentive for approving new development. The state is in a better financial situation than it has been and it is time to begin reversing the actions taken to balance the state budget. Cities should also cite the impact revenue reductions and cost increases imposed on their city by state budget actions has had on their ability to provide vital public services. Background and details on each of the bills follow. In 1992-93 and 1993-94, the state transferred about $3.5 billion in property tax revenue from cities, counties, and special districts to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) for the support of K-14 school districts. In 1994, legislation was enacted that provided that once all school districts in the county become "basic aid" districts, contributions to ERAF would be capped at that level. A "basic aid" district is a school district that receives sufficient property tax so that the state is required to fund only the constitutionally required $120 per student. Thus, the state no longer saves money by a larger ERAF transfer to the school district. In two separate education trailer bills to the 1995-96 budget, this provision was changed to provide that transfers to ERAF could be used to fund the special education costs of local school districts. The only two counties affected in 1995-96 were Marin and Mono Counties. In August of 1995, statute was changed to limit the ERAF contribution for special education to $5 million in Marin County and to require no contribution to Mono County. As property tax revenue increases over time or as enrollment in K-12 school declines, all counties may be affected by this provision. The following bills address the partial return of ERAF revenues to local agencies: AB 2228 (Mazzoni) would provide that the limitation of $5 million for Marin County and no contribution for Mono County would apply only to the 1995-96 fiscal year. The bill would further provide that ERAF cannot be used for support of special education costs in any cc linty commencing in 1996-97. AB 2228 has been referred to both the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee and the Assembly Local Government Committee. It is set for hearing in Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee on Monday, April 8. AB 2406 (Villaraigosa) would reinstate the 10 and 11 percent marginal personal income tax rates for income years commencing on or after January 1, 1996. It would dedicate the additional General Fund revenue collected as a result of the new marginal income tax rates to the repayment of the ERAF transfer. The funds would be allocated to the cities, counties, and special districts in proportion to the property tax revenue each local agency contributed to ERAF. AB 2406 has been referred to both the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee and the Assembly Local #12 7 3/22/96 Government Committee. AB 2406 will be heard on Wednesday, April 17 in Assembly Local Government Committee. AB 2797 (Aguiar) and SB 1865 (Craven) would limit the contribution to ERAF of each city, county, and special district to the amount contributed in the prior year. Thus, any growth in assessed value would be allocated to the contributing local agency rather than ERAF. These provisions are similar to League -supported SB 1167 (Craven) of last year that failed passage in the Senate Appropriations Committee. The hearing for SB 1865 has been rescheduled for Wednesday, April 10, in Senate Local Government Committee. AB 2797 has been referred to the Assembly Local Government Committee and the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee. It has been set for hearing in Assembly Local Government Committee on Wednesday, April 10. AB 2828 (Sweeney) would allocate an unspecified percentage of growth in state General Fund revenues which exceed the estimate prepared for the 1995 May Revision of Revenues and Expenditures to partially repay local agencies for their contributions to ERAF. This percentage would be applied to the General Fund revenues after calculation of the Proposition 98 share. Funds would be returned to local agencies in proportion to the amount contributed by each local agency. In future fiscal years, an unspecified percentage of the annual growth in the General Fund would be set aside to continue to repay the shift of property tax to ERAF. In this way local agencies would share in the state's fiscal improvement with schools and other state -funded programs. AB 2828 has been referred to both the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee and the Assembly Local Government Committee. AB 2828 will be heard in Assembly Local Government Committee on Wednesday, April 10. Cities should contact the authors of these bills, the committees they are referred to, and the Governor regarding their support of returning ERAF transfer revenues to cities. (See Committee membership after Legislative Activities in this Bulletin.) (AB 2228 was referred to previously in Bulletin #10-1996 and 11-1996; AB 2406 was referred to previously in Bulletin #10-1996, and 11-1996; AB 2797 was referred to previously in Bulletin #9-1996 and 11-1996; AB 2828 was referred to previously in Bulletin #9-1996 and 11-1996; and SB 1865 was referred to previously in Bulletin #10-1996 and 11-1996.) [League Staff: Judi Smith] 2. Telecommunications Excavation Permits, Preemption - Limitation of Local Authority. [SB 1896 (Costa) - Oppose] Pending in Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee SB 1896 would prohibit a city from charging any amount beyond the actual costs of process a permit for a telecommunications company to excavate local streets. SB 1896 is sponsored by the California Taxpayers Association and a group of telecommunications companies who want to head off any attempt by cities to charge an impact fee for damage to local right of way by telecommunications companies. Our transportation infrastructure is under siege. SB 1896 #12 8 3/22/96 1 April3, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April9, 1996 LETTER FROM 111E CITY OF COVINA REQUESTING SUPPORT FOR SB1977 Recommendation: That the City Council authorize letters of support for SB1977 which would shift 1% of the state sales tax to cities and counties on the basis of population. Background: The City of Covina has pursued the shift of 1% of the states sales tax for some time. The League of California Cities' Revenue and Taxation Committee voted to support SB1977 with the per capita amendment, including counties and providing for a two year phase in. This bill well be heard on April 17, 1996 before the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee and they are requesting that cities send a letter of support prior to the committee hearing. Based on the information contained in the letter, the per capita share would be $90.00 or around 1,700,000 for Hermosa Beach. Needless to say, this would be a very reliable, predictable source of revenue that would allow our City to maintain the services expected by our residents, businesses and visitors. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager • 116 04/03/1996 01:08 b1b-8b8-bbbb hNV. FAX SENT BY CARY KALSCHEUER TEL. 818/858-7250. PAGES SENT: 3 l'AUE 01/0.3 CITY OF COVINA April 2, 1996 125 East College Street • Covina, California 91723-2199 Subject: SB 1977 Mayors, City Council Members. City Managers, and Finance Directors: On March 29, 1996. the League of Califomia Cities' Revenue and Taxation Committee voted to support SB 1977 with amending language. As you probably know, SB 1977 calls for a 1% shift in the sales tax from the state to cities. Three changes in the bill were supported by the Committee: (1) to allocate the extra percent based on a per capita formula; (2) to include counties as recipients of the extra percent of sales tax revenue; and (3) to phase-in the impact of this bill over two years. These changes were submitted to the Legislative Counsel for bill modification this week pursuant to the League Revenue and Taxation Committee's support. Since the concept was introduced, Covina's position has been that any additional sales tax should be distributed on a point of sale basis. The reason is that those cities which develop and provide services to retail facilities should be the beneficiaries of the taxes those facilities generate. However, a compromise which maintains, the Bradley -Burns point of sale 1% and changes Section 6051 of the Revenue and Taxation Code providing an additional 1% per capita could put to rest once -and -for -all the cyclical debate on per capita vs. point of sale" sales taxes. The debates and arguments over Bradley -Bums have In the past fragmented the League and often placed cities in an adversarial role. Having 2% (1% point of sale, and 1% per capita) is a win- win for all cities. The per capita allocation .method should generate about $90 per person in revenue for each city, city and county, and county unincorporated areas. based on the 1995 population figures as determined by the State Department of Finance. This amendment In SB 1977 was not only necessary to get the League's support, but to also gain Interest by California's counties and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Association (HJTA). The arguments in favor of redistribution, as described in our March 12, 1996 letter to you, still hold. All cities should agree on this issue and be thankful for any revenue augmentation that occurs through adoption of this bill. If we wish to have success in our effort to secure legislative support, we must be willing to compromise on issues of local government interest. In order to be effective. we must appear to be united on municipal govemment affairs. In regards to the inclusion of counties, this seems only fair, and is of the utmost interest to the HJTA because of the revenue losses counties experienced under the property tax shift. Through a per capita distribution method, counties would receive about 20% of the total sales tax revenue from a 1% rate, as opposed to about 14% when using a point of sale distribution method. Finally, there is the phase-in of this revenue shift, half percent the first year, and half percent the second year. This change was made to reduce the impact on.the state budget from 5% in one year, to less than 2.5% in two consecutive years. The impact on the state budget was a concem of the League's and this change will allow the state time to plan for how it will make up the difference. 04/03/1996 01:08 818-858-5556 April 2, 1996 SB .1977 Page 2 ENV. SVCS. HACiE 02/03 Since we have embarked on this bill, many cities have asked, "Where is the state going to get the money for this bill?" There are two good sources. First, the Governor is proposing a tax cut in excess of $10 billion by 1999 based on projected revenue growth in the state. This projected revenue growth could be applied to cover the cost of this bill if the state so chooses. Second, up to now the only significant cuts in .governmental spending in California have been at the local and county level. We believe SB 1977 represents a new more aggressive policy making stance for cities. This is important because, as we all know, cities' interests have been eroded this last several years in the intergovernmental community. This is evident from the billions upon billions which have been lost to other groups and agencies, and the increasing need for cities to tax their local constituents just to maintain basic services. SB 1977 provides the local taxpayer direct benefit viamunicipal services for the taxes they already pay. Covina calls upon all cities to aim higher, seek to achieve more. and generally make cities your priority when considering funding needs. This is especially important now because of the need to educate and inform our local constituents as to what is happening to local resources and why. It is no longer acceptable for one agency to take another's money just because they have the power to do so. Such actions diminish accountability on all levels of government. not only our own. and make it more difficult for all of us to maintain our credibility before voters. SB 1977 will restore lost confidence in California's system of government by making all agencies more accountable. With the proposed amendments insisted on by the League and others. SB 1977 will improve the economy, improve the equitable distribution of sales tax revenues, and greatly reduce the competition amongst cities for retailers. I encourage you to 'have your city send a letter of support for this bill to Senator Richard Mountjoy, State Capitol, Room 4062. Sacramento, CA 95814 or FAX him a letter at 818/445- 3591. Because this bill is set for a hearing by the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee on April 17. 1996, it is preferable that Mountjoy receive your support letter before then. If you are able, please send .a letter to each of the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee members. If you would like more information, please feel free to contact Francis M. Delach at 818/858-7212 or Cary Kalscheuer at 818/858-7250. Linda Sarver Mayor i 84/03/1996 01:08 ENATOR Chairwoman Killea, L. (I) Vice Chairman vacancy Boatwright, D.(D) 8urtt, R (R) Johnson, Ross (R) 4-(I) Harks, M. (D) Petris, NAD) Thompson, 14-(13) 818-858-5556 ENV. SVCS. SENATE MEMBERS REVENUE A61D •TA'XATION COMMITTEE FAX CAPITOL All (916) area 327-2188 323-8985 327-2186 327-7229 327-1997 323-695$ -421.1.1527=1 PAGE 03/03 CAPITOL PHONE DISTRICT PHONE All (916) area . (619)696-8930 445-3952 (510)689-0618 • 1714)898-8033 (714)833-0696 (415)589-5953 (415)346-4009 (510)286-3885 (107)576-2773 • Letters can be sent to: State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 445-6083 445-5831 445-4961 445-0503 445-1412. 445-6577 445-.3375 (619)696-6955 (510)'689-1973 .(714)898-8353 (714)833.-018a (415)952-5666 (415) 474-0308 (510)286-1333 (707) 576-2771 March 26, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 REQUEST OF THE AMERICAN OCEANS CAMPAIGN FOR RENEWAL OF THE OCS OIL DRILLING MORATORIUM Purpose: To provide information concerning the subject oil drilling moratorium and determine whether the City Council wishes to take a position. Background: The American Oceans Campaign is urging the City Council to support HR2241 which will Continue the oil drilling moratorium on the outer continental shelf (OCS) (federal waters) through the year 2000. HR2242 will provide permanent protection of the OCS from oil and gas leasing. Information is attached from the American Oceans Campaign. Recommendation: Determine whether or not the City Council wishes to take a position on this legislation and, if in support, adopt the attached resolution and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached letter. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R.`$urrell City Manager 17 c MAR -19-1996 15:41 FROM March 18, 1996 Via first class mail & facsimile AMERICAN OCEAN CAMPAIGN IU ySr�bltib AMERICAN OCEANS CAMPAIGN Mayor Albert Wiemans City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mayor Wiemans: 1 am writing to ask you to sponsor and support the enclosed resolution calling for renewal of federal legislation to continue the annual moratorium on additional oil and gas leasing in federal waters off California (H.R. 2241) and new legislation to provide permanent protection from oil and gas leasing in federal waters off California (the outer continental shelf or OCS; H.R. 2242). Southem California cities took the lead in banning oil drilling on its coastline in 1988 with the passage of Proposition O. The State of California followed with the adoption of a permanent ban in State coastal waters. Federal waters, however, in Santa Monica Bay and elsewhere along the Califomia coast have been at risk every year and only through the adoption of a continuing moratorium in the federal budget each year have we been able to block leasing activities. This year a bipartisan effort is underway to pass permanent protections for sensitive coastal waters around the Nation. Your support would significantly help this effort. I urge you to support both the new legislation (H.R. 2242) and the continuing moratorium (H.R. 2241), which will provide protection if the permanent ban is not adopted. 1 have asked AOC policy counsel, Joan Hartmann, to be available to your office to answer any questions you might have about this issue. Thank you for your support in advance of this important environmental legislation. Sincerely, Ted Danson President Enc. A nOr.profil organization dedicated to saving Americas oceans. Rieder, on tad% 725 Arizona Avenue, Suite 102 Santa Monica, California 90401 (310) 576-6162 FAX (310) 576-6170 201 Massachusetts Avenue NE, Suite C-3 Washington, D.C. 20002 (202) 544-3526 FAX (202) 544-5625 11nn SAr`nnrl Aur+nr to Si rifA 1n9 RPM HIP WA Ch QR1n1 FR9-Sr144 FAX (RRfl) 677-8113 BOARD OF DIRECTORS led Danson President Casey Coates Danson Vice Pisedant Mark RyaveC secretary Connie Mississippi lionsurer Keith Addis Ed Begley Jr. Sharon Benjamin Gerald Breslauer Skip Brittenham Warner Chabot Richard Charter Lu Haas Michael Haynes Susan Iger Joanna Kerns Tom Knapp Christopher duPont- Roosevelt H. Delano Roosevelt Anthony J. Robbins Robert Segal Mary Swig Steven Swig Bob Talbot Michael Visbal Annett Wolt Robert H. Sulnick Eraceutive Director FOUNDING SUPPORTERS The Honorable; Anthony C. Beilenson Barbara Boxer George E. Brown, Jr. John Chaise Alan Crarraton wben Gors. Jr, Robert Graham Daniel Inouye Joseph Ksnn dy tl John Kerry Mel Levine Bal Lowery Mike Lowry John Matcher George Mike, Leon Panetta Claiborne Pec Patricia Sarki JimJornot Saxton Claudine SOhnaider Gerry Studds Morris Udell Lowell Weicker Pate Wilon Klrstle Alley Jett Bridges Loyd Bridges Susan Bridges Omni Burnett CourierDannyCourier De Vito Emilio Eete+'e Sally Field Lola Garner James Garner Kelsey Grammer Sally Kellerman Kris Kristotterson Lica Knztonerson Jack Lzmnron Leonard Nintoy Rhea Perknan John Aatzenberyer ANYShsedy Patrick Swayze & use Mend Robert ()rich George Wendl Peter Wel* 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING RENEWAL OF THE OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING MORATORIUM AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO PROVIDE LONG TERM PROTECTION FROM OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING WHEREAS, the U.S. House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Department of Interior Appropriations will consider lifting the current nationwide ban on offshore oil drilling along environmentally sensitive areas of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS); and, WHEREAS, federal legislation has been introduced (HR2241 and HR2242), which provides long term protection from future offshore oil drilling in sensitive California waters; and, WHEREAS, technology does not exist to fully prevent, clean up, or contain oil spills for the types of ocean and wind conditions that are present throughout the year in the affected offshore waters adjacent to the Hermosa Beach coast; and, WHEREAS, coastal dependent tourism is a mainstay of the local economy in the communities of the southern California coast, as well as other coastal areas in California and elsewhere that would be impacted by a lifting of the drilling moratorium; and, WHEREAS, critical commercial fishery tracts would be impacted by the oil drilling activities that would be permitted by this action, and that severe fishing conflicts could be expected to occur; and, WHEREAS, estuaries and river mouths which serve as critical nursery and food source habitats for commercial fish Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 species would be in direct proximity to oil drilling activities permitted by a lifting of the OCS drilling moratorium, and would therefore be subject to significant adverse impacts in the event of a spill; and, WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has traditionally taken a lead role in opposition to offshore drilling proposals that could impact the Hermosa Beach coastline. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach urges that the U.S. House of Representatives support HR2241 and HR2242; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach urges that the U.S. House of Representatives' (Subcommittee on Department of Interior Appropriations) include renewal of the moratoria on Outer Continental Shelf oil drilling activities in environmentally sensitive coastal areas in this year's House Interior Appropriations Bill. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of April, 1996 PRESIDENT, of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney Page 2 I'IHK-17-177b 15;4d t-KUI9 HI''ILK1LHN UI..tHN 1...H111-H1laN IU J.S(261Ub P.03 drat Local Gove. !efer supporting Moratorium and permanent pretecllon legislation Draft Local Government Letter Date, 1996 The Honorable Ralph S. Regula Chairman, Sub -Committee on Interior and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations U.S. House of Representatives Washington D.C., 20515-3516 Re: jtewalof the OCS OilDrilling,Moratorium and Su000rt for 1 2241 and 2242 Dear Chairman Regula: The City/ Cowuyl Board of write to you in support of continuing the moratorium, in this year's Interior Appropriations bill, on additional oil and gas leasing in federal waters off California. We also support HR 2241, which continues the moratorium through the year 2000. and HR 2242, which will establish permanent protection from oil and gas leasing for the California outer continental shelf. The county's / city's / board's position is consistent with other California governmental agencies' mandates and policies in its call for protecting California's sensitive coastal resources. These sensitive coastal resources provide the basis of California's coastal . economy and arc nationally significant. The plant, fish, bird, and marine manmsal species which will be protected by HR 2241 and HR 2242 support California's multi -billion dollar fishing industry — an industry depedent on sound, renewable resource management In addition, clean Pacific waters also form the basis for California's coastal tourism industry — valued at over $27 billion annually and the source of tens of thousands of California jobs. If the California coast and offshore areas were opened to oil and gas development, they would produce a maximum of only 41 days of oil for the nation at current rates of. consumption. Oil and gas production would come at the certain cost of oil spills, contamination by the toxic wastes and air emissions generated by offshore rigs and service vessels, and the increased risk of tanker accidents. Industrializing our shoreline to serve these offshore facilities would also degrade sensitive coastal habitats. Conservation measures are now available that will achieve far greater oil savings than the California OCS can produce, without the environmental risks brought by development. Like twelve of the past thirteen Interior Appropriations bills, last year's House and Senate Interior Appropriations bills contained OCS leasing moratoria for California. We have wasted far too much time fighting over a relatively insignificant energy resource. That time could have been far more productively spent devising real solutions to our energy needs. 1 111:1R-1.-1yb 15 4i I-KUM KILN UHN ULLHN C:HI11-H1LiN I U r. a4 drat Local Gvvr. inter supporting Moratorium! and permwanenr ororect.on lcvslatron Now we must put the debate over California OCS development behind us so that we can focus on developing real solutions to our energy needs so that we can compete and win in the global economy of the 21st century. The only way to put that debate behind us is to permanently protect California's offshore waters. Anything less than permanent protection will only produce more controversy and more fighting, and will continue to distract the . focus from the real energy issues facing the nation. In closing, we urge you to heed the voice of this City / County / Board by continuing the moratorium on California OCS leasing and by supporting HR 2241 and HR 2242. Enclosed is our Resolution supporting the renewal of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) oil drilling moratorium and the passage of HR 2241 and HR 2242. Thank you for your consideration of our views on this important matter. Sincerely, cc: Governor Pete Wilson Senator Diane Feinstein Senator Barbara Boxer Leon Panetta Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt Congressman Howard Berman Congressman Brian Bilbray Congressman Christopher Cox Congressman Randy Cunningham Congressman Sam Farr Congressman Bob Finer Congresswoman Jane Harman Congressman Steve Horn Congressman Duncan Hunter Congressman Jerry Lewis Congressman Bob Livingston Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren Congressman Ron Packard Congressman Frank Riggs Congresswoman Lucile Roybal-Allard Congresswoman Andrea Seastrand Congressman Esteban Torres 2 TOTAL P.04 4. March 26, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 REQUEST OF METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT TO SUPPORT PROPOSED COLORADO RIVER PROGRAM Purpose: To provide information on subject request and determine whether or not the City Council wishes to take a position. Background: The proposed Colorado River Program by Metropolitan Water District would assist in providing low cost water to Southern California. Metropolitan Water District has provided the attached information and requests that the City Council authorize sending a letter to Governor Wilson in favor of the proposed program. Recommendation: Determine whether or not the City Council wishes to take a position and, if so, authorize Mayor to sign attached letter. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 170 IIJ11 11 MWD The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California An Obligation to Provide Water to 16 Million Southern Californians A Mission to Find the Cheapest, Most Reliable Source Setting the Record Straight - "A Commitment to Consensus" The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) is in discussions with fellow Colorado River users in a quest to identify innovative means to ensure that all lower basin users (California, Arizona and Nevada) will have the water they need to support their regions for the next hundred years. While the particulars of these discussions are fluid, and the final contents of a consensus document -- if one is achieved -- are unknown, MWD's commitment to securing inexpensive, reliable water for Southern California is unwavering. There has been much misinformation and resulting confusion about MWD's plans. Until consensus is achieved it is inappropriate to elaborate on particulars that may emerge from discussions with all relevant parties. In the interim, however, it is appropriate to reinforce the need for reliable water, and to remind people what all the controversy is really about: low cost vs. expensive water. The Urgency - "Low -Cost Water is in Jeopardy" MWD was created in 1928 to build an aqueduct to provide an ongoing source of Colorado River water to Southern Californians. In 1963, the Supreme Court cut MWD's 1.2 million acre-feet water allotment by half. While the implications of this decision were devastating, more than 30 years later, Southern California has, fortunately, yet to experience the negative impact. Other states, principally Arizona, have not developed as quickly as anticipated. As a result, the Secretary of Interior has been able to approve -- on a year -by -year basis -- access to approximately 650,000 acre-feet of UN -used water on the river. One day soon, this water will be needed by other states and thus lost to California's industry and residents. The Issue - "Low -Cost vs. Expensive Water" MWD obtains its water predominantly from two sources -- the Colorado River and the State Water Project (SWP). The Colorado River is MWD's primary source of supply because it has been reliable in the past, and at a future rate of $75 an acre-foot, will be far less expensive than SWP supplies. If consensus is not reached as to how to secure additional low cost water from the Colorado River, MWD could be forced to turn to out-of-state water marketers who have approached MWD with offers to sell water at $400 an acre foot -- or more! Confusion and continued uncertainty is the goal of these water marketers who seek to profit obscenely from California's need for reliable supplies. While such distractions are inevitable, our commitment to affordable, reliable water for 16 million Southern Californians will not waiver. Improved Colorado River Reservoir Management The Key to an Affordable, Reliable Water Supply in Southern California WHAT IS RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT? Reservoir management is the practice by which a regulator or law determines how much water can be stored in a reservoir, when to release it, how much to release, and who has rights to it. WHAT IS "IMPROVED" RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT? Improved reservoir management would permit the Federal Government to evaluate the flow and storage of river water in a sound fashion, resulting in more water available to those in need. HOW WILL IT'PREVENT WATER FROM BEING LOST? Southern California receives the bulk of its imported water from the Colorado River. The Colorado River is the least expensive source of imported water and is more reliable than other alternatives, such as the State Water Project. Total capacity of all Colorado River system reservoirs, including Lake Mead, is approximately 60 million acre-feet of water. Current federal procedures, however, result in a practice in which reservoirs are kept unnecessarily full. As a result, during particularly rainy season, if storage reaches a little over 55 million acre feet on January 1, excess water must be released from the reservoirs. When this water is released, it may flow to the Gulf of California unused by anyone. For example, between 1983 and 1988, most of the 50 million acre-feet of Colorado River water, that could have been made available to interested customers, was released and flowed to the Gulf MWD is encouraging the Federal Government to change existing procedures and lower storage levels, thereby preventing the loss of additional water in the future, and making this water available to Southern California customers. WHY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SHOULD CARE? For more than 30 years, MWD has been fortunate to be granted access --on an annual basis --to an extra supply of low-cost Colorado River water that is not being used by other states, like Arizona and Nevada. With growth in those states expected to increase in coming years, this unused water will soon be unavailable to Southern California's industry and residents. Merely improving the means by which Colorado River water is stored in and released from Lake Mead, will result in hundreds of thousands of acre-feet of additional low-cost water each year. WHAT HAPPENS IF CHANGES ARE NOT MADE? If improved reservoir management criteria are not adopted, millions of acre-feet of low-cost water will continue to be lost. More importantly, MWD would be forced to spend as much as S3.5 billion more than necessary to provide a reliable water supply to Southern California for the next 30 years. revised 3/8/96 FORM OF LETTER PROVIDED BY MWD March , 1996 Honorable Pete Wilson Governor Of California 1st Floor, State Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Re: Colorado River Program - Support Dear Governor Wilson: The City of supports the Metropolitan Water District Of Southern California (MWD) in its efforts to secure more reliable, low cost water for Southern California. As you are well aware, the Colorado River Aqueduct has been the backbone and life support of Southern California's $475 billion economy. It is critical that the Aqueduct be kept full with the most reliable, affordable source of water available. Two critical components of MWD's efforts to ensure a full Aqueduct are improved reservoir management and banking. If MWD is successful in convincing the Secretary of the Interior to adopt suggested changes to reservoir management criteria and to implement its right to bank (store water saved from conservation programs), Southern California will have access to hundreds of thousands of acre-feet of reliable, affordable water. On behalf of the City of , I encourage you to join MWD in its efforts to secure changes to federal reservoir management criteria and implementation approval of its right to bank water. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Respectfully, ,1‘1.1.11;.,1 V cu MAR 2 1 1996 CITY MGR. OFFICE March 20,1996 Mr. John "Jack" O'Hara Hermosa Beach,California Mayor John Bowler Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley,Hermosa Beach California 90254 Dear Mayor John, Congratulations on the St.Pat's success. Outstanding community day. Let's expand into an Iris -American Partnership and take a town in Ireland as our partner (like sister city program). We can have ex- changes, trips, and have them March in the 1997 parade. I'd take it on,but I am now too old (89 yrs. in May). Lots of willing Irishmen in town to chair such a committee (Dick McCurdy; Dennis O'Dell; Mary Rooney: and many, many other business men and women). Would you please consider this? Fondly, (9A'f, Jack O'Hara 19 a 42." HNaNt • GKL1'[ING PLAY 'FICLDw. C < S(=RVI�E Acc ss—� �fi•3k �1 ALL. cov (e -Ts MAT UJALL Li= -[HIC. TOT V=slutr4plm f DJ A t. k: w a y IINei r.oF ZoNI. r A* .9 r o isLettf- RfTRooth' r -T" 'Ne rAtl r i 1 r d'e-•An- Isl.-cocks 1 V� Q r-E-Mo'J A 6t..6 6o L. t- A R.pi .r _t cvlcb R'c.1 VIMM rxfc5--tis. zot eke. H t$ aT tit I M r* 0\174 A•eEsss To rup►LIo t_o r e e -ronin 0A4-ILI'TV. • rRmvt n onswitNa ;I.I 1 sI' t6LOGI•a • IMRIVAIM •sIe(4r4Op-. M? gSTING tveAurrits cls or �ICL1=> - MASet te-{Z PLAN n -i ° s le,. I or• 6ddor o.H I•3'1G P1ar-MosA A Po OPO5U '74)1 CONC WALKWAY IZ 40.02' P OJSC'r IATA BREWERY FI1251 FLOOR SCOND FLOOR TOTAL BREWERY PA110 AA5 PATIO o F1151- FLOOR PATIO o 5ECONT2 FLOOR PAf10 e 11-W LEVEL TOTAL 747 50, FT, PATIO APIA o MAIN LEVEL FOP 1:E9rn.r r iY 4785 50, Ff. 1540 50. FT, 6325 50. FT. 747 50. FT. 642 50. Pf, 726 50, FT. 2115 50, Ft, 40.02' CONC. WALKWAY PUMP ---h 6 5If... PLAN SCALE: I/ 8 jYt F r t. r r._rTh r If40.02' 1.40.02' CITY SIDEWALK kr5r .KMIT 652:95c2.E.LV II telt FT, 41 , COI.RTYARD AZEA FOlt.WAIN-' Off10E SPACE OFFICE 5tt1E #A Of rice StnTE *13 OFFICE StuTE #c OFFICE; 5111E #D OF rice SIJiE #E OFFICE SITE #F TOTAL AREA OFFa SIfl5 PECK MA 011 rr-o 1255 50. Ff. 1469 50. Ff. 2289 50, FT. 1125 50, FT. 112550.FT. 1660 50, FT. 8960 50, PT. 162050. Ft n=n" PAWING LOtWR LEVEL IPPER LEVEL TOTAL PAWING REGI MENT5 RE51"AUZAKtf OFFI TOTAL PROVIDED TOTAL 12E01RP ft 30.01' MEC StE. #A 1255 50, Ft, I L InI e0 -It30.01' 42 5PACE5 41 5PACE5 83 SPACES 55 SPACES 24 SPACE5 65 5PACE5 19 SPACE5 WM051 — -1- s7-0" k. 50,01' - - -� CONC. WALKWAY -- - - --1 PLANTER OFFICE 51E. #13 1496 50. Ff. , e r&ei rr .,b WALKWAY IOCNE --H 2'-0"5111120 yir' CON. CfYP) intrA r-- ' Y `11^ 1 30,0!' NMDCX RAq IP�) . 4! II On' 5I9CWALK OFFICE 5146, #C 229 50, PT. iv mal { tr-o' It 50,01 1', hLLE,VLL) JAN 1 8 1996 PLANNING DEPT. PKOPo5Et7 9r1OPING - Pf?OPOSEt7 !TIMING WALL 8 8 56" TAL WALL b 13 Jr § FIZOPOSE7 511011% PtzcPo5E171TTANING WALL CL PALM MK 170.00' 36" TALL\ WALL 2r." 5TOP.A2 AMA 5tofz AMA 5fOP.AGE AMA AMA STORAGE AMA 5fOF&Z AMAAMA STOWE WORACE -a- AMA STORAcZ A&A .y 1014^ I. gam" II -6• 8'.6" if -6" 42 PMKING SPACES e4" + 74" 74" % r4^ —Or 74" i 74" i r4" I ti, 0 ACtTKO PROPoSECJ rETAINING WALL �oU p LM. PAN 8'4" m4" ELES'QATC STAIg5 EXISTING ITtANING WALL TO /ZEMAN 8'4" l ty 10'4" 4» 7-6" 74" 14" �_._---_r•I^ SP EXISTING MIMING WALL -k- W PEMAIN 56" TALL WALL 2 • i r -r ¢•r w r' °1c— 1 ', MOP05Ef7 SNO,ZNG il -- 1 i 170,00' a MANHATTAN AVE. / MOP OcP MTANING / WALL { PROP, LINE J 1 1/1-^'pe+.✓l f212O12O5Er WANG PROPo5Et7 RETAINING WALL 8 SCALE: 1 / 8" - 1's-0 " nECEn/ED JAN 1 8 1996 wJthNI G DEPT. ad]Q ONINNH .+ o-,1- 119/1'310; SLCO IP LFVft. PAKIN6 PLAN JOB NO. DRAWN BY SCALE DATE tts 40 <bit WAY sAMP lP J a 4 ii Ire -1? M'-d' REVISIONS A I 4 L -C '4" e-� k 4, D-6" r.y1 c wE5\ r-6^ r 4 29140" 26.40" 7 VI Io 26'40" 4 4 4 4 d. e -o a 4 gik et d 4 4 ApPC'f h?C MIAgOn../O1'A''L a! vcfifa: f- A .. MP -0 1 . ,.-.-, ,',..., i'ii, , hi `S.'i..va:...-...w. ate,,*^,t,.; I Architectural Design Robert L. Codey, Architect 4504 Del Amo Boulevard Suite E Torrance, California 90503 310 214-0876 FAX 310 370-2986 r 15 .-0“ ' Z(Y•CYf 1044" s 90'•0" PE -On 4014:0 ' , KV -04 r _- 210-01 . an sompess mo K Lk] b c 3 0 ... t Li 4 • t 4 1 747 50. Ft. PATIO-<- , . 1 '' '' ' �`� ' MA a MAW Level s °° r FOtzl�5TtRA1'WU / SEATING 120 CHAIRS I ING AT TABLES taLSc•, # 4� Li20-25 AT' BAR \ '"v' a GRAIN I- - SI .TLt,.. 84L0 p ,-, l I n i 1 t 1 n l 1 n 1 •. �Yl DIA, F 1 7' t / Pt-�``�' tl.•9 REAS TANKS ✓ I i' 1 ITR ON PLAT ORM PACKAGING 0K O. XFT DISITYASH ( _ - ABOVE FLOOR NOTA aria 52. #tAzr �'. 1235 50. F1 ii OFFICE 5517t.�{#6 1467 orrice 5[TTE. ff. I. 2289 f f 50. f 1. 50. ! 1. ,•. — ER "--' f f �� KETTLE rrsn ER f I I 111 PaTT THRU ,L i ,. .. ij _ LE '60 SG. FT. KITCHEN irl i L}f ill 15 , i A111 PREP ---ii -- 13 BBL UNI TANK • KITC}1EX PI 1AL�{1 - _. a e MASH � STA ION - r girlie _ -- — �-- --- -tGN —y� �,' 41 Y PIZZA }}, �OVEN /l ._-I i • 73QBBL, um TA( ` , q mD - •; ;� i' • ii •; 0 Th15 PltA LOCK ■. n. f •. h_ 1 , LINE4 ;r ii si it 1 i f I ai$i Of FOOD I l cOCLERSTORAGE 20' GLG 1 W5 I s. , .�� m.. 2360 S0. FT. . _ •- it 0 I °YBa ST 1R4 lI �f ENS r F-1 O STORAGE., rri IIM WOMENS T •^ _ _ t. ill) , eirAR / IN SERVING / !F!F TANKS I I i jt I OVER \.-... NEAP 1 S m 0 1 a 4 r I N � ® , i!'4" 40'x' ; 11-4°ri 17 GO 6'¢' T4• fif B'4^ 2'4" re -6"4'Y • d4^ -O'1 R'O" If ., e 9.411 ICY -SA 41 sr i F 7S' -Y' 4Ir (9'$' 2CY4"* 20'•0" 90'4" 111 se 0'4� 1 A I 11. FIk5t fI.00P COMMFZCI S01t:1/5"-1'-O'" It RECEIVED JAN 1 8 1996 PLANNING DEPT. LU J U 1.4J 0 REVISIONS A A A r LU J U 1.4J 0 7014 I.60 2'4° 19-r 14'4" 6'-W trio" 36" TALL PALING rarausoaralswarrr OPENAVLE 51StYLICHT ABOVE Y 4'-r 2NV LEVEL PATIO a R55fAi.RANf 692 50. Ff. 44r wood arta 420 50. Ff. RE5TALRANf AREA 154050, Ft 51t1ZACt ROOM '6050.ff. 0 1 alla 39050. f1. VP LEVEL PA11O a 726 50. Ft, 36" TALL RAILING 36" CALL RAILING DAC If I. OPEN kv.E 5K,tLatf AVM 1 1 36" TALL RAILING 1 OPEN t0 6EL0W J 701-4' 46'-1" 2'-0"5Q. COLM,C VP) \ 0 630 5Q. Ff. ma AREA a OFFICE T241 2741° 630 5Q. PT, PECK AREA a OFFICE r 960 50. Ft PECK AREA a OFFICE 840" 1 h OFFICE 5Th # E 1129 5Q. Ft r r b M 26'4° OFFa STE nF 166050. FT. A'4" 5C0Kt2 FLOOR COMMM CI& SCALE: I/8" -1 -0" hi:CE /ED JAN 181996 r. MNNING DEPT. 0 • G+FF* b r tc. car" A c P$Ct et)) 'rE 41'F SIG Atc-.A -Cietticiere S1 n t *` E a,SeA j+9 AIN t..a\tat- cow af'vamp raw NTA 11J UP&f .0 I_�vEi. raci-t n 4tc_-CG4Jt7 LCL 1.0 tat CAZ LSYl='L ; r ; ;.;-z4,1 ft , II1 T r1 1.L.IGt-0/;t i cE —4 Lout -r2 Levet- .-'ruLLC.ti 5 Ex,tAJr 'f1G430tM.1.CY t"G.'rt,,,513"'LCWEIZ t. /EL PPale nit 41 r.141,6 LcU Lt' EL F�P¢� I,JLi a,u'rtzw-l.^..1z FSAGCsvPa a T 2A3TCU4"Aw 1+1,5' 12e; 15 te. 'That ssai 1860544.119 joy , e1r z 4'V t2 ta, CW. p*,F i 2G r et 3 L,OVisz ,/ I'2.Cs, %r - z h1 17EGK t l t. , $t ute. t0tC.c, L tn�•g' hit tad LFv6L a..e�uE� f'tytq Haw La=Nr-:- eta,.HdrN It:144t HAx 1 -torn -4 4 1 & P4 9G4-Ie1tE i*m13' Hew -LrstM 14i 0' nt-da uW,1i4I4I.3. v v+. '4: t`"` Yy �{^F--�YrL �i-+r+• h. i .,w.. 1 . ..-.Y.;_ n r• .t• HAY +With ms, &et I .tt><t 13}.r — - '- J 'rtb}t its-.ir4 - i 145,6 i r c' k I=114 -ACAG7E ,tol&G tkrr ramp. nw}4'r,r rtimcya franc -tilt, tecL4rsa MdAn.✓_1tJ�,r tu. elm:Aloe: t -L& sth.iyrrt.{ 107.--11 1)8 ... • �..,..''"Y,ir4r -fit` ,= GLGY -4-11y';L1U 14" -rILA tr (P) s!* J Cer- ;tr?;,L Gtd? EAGT Tb11.1-i c1 4! ere-. — a, Ec!c . en -Lace Ftur>t-i (..'ry') 2b1 -W tTcvl+.h t 14 'QC .. r!'eCrt-AC?1t Ivt.nur -cS &rtr) 811.1ir,.xtor TALL Oreit21 r t-awi:-I^h CrY0 ) Hhuivic .ln C2 -1 T WLLJocLu, t-rtr) w4° 4 GolrNii IJ J 'h" 044 44-1 :t2 C of tr4ary G'i'ft") ! ad34 DMINN Ct; n T. I t o — 1 T AC t t3 r2 nr- C JOB NO DRAWN BY SCALE DATE N -I 4t-4 J4� REVISIONS r art eft J --1 I l� Architectural Design Robert L. Corley, Architect 4504 Del Arno Boulevard Suite E Torrance, California 90503 310 214-0876 FAX 310 370-2986