Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/23/96ACTION SHET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 23, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 7:11pm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Cathy McCurdy ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT PROCLAMATION: PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK May 1-7,1%6 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Merna Marshall; Sister Cities, Cinco De Mayo Fiesta, 5/4, 6 -10pm, , Kiwanis Club, $15 adult, $5 children 7-12. Call 374-4072 for tickets. Carol Risa: BCHD, Anxiety Screening Day, 5/1, South Bay Hospital Auditorium, IOam to 7pm,. Call 374-4298 for more information. Cindy Demboski; 242 - 31st St.: 31st Street Fence Issue. THIS ISSUE WILL RETURN AT THE 5/14/96 MEETING. Marjorie Fish; 3233 The Strand: Expressed disappointment with the condition of the north Strand wall and walkway. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS NONE 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meetinE of the City Council held on April 9, 1996. • ACTIO ...................... SHEET ........................... REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 23, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 7:llpm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Cathy McCurdy ROLL CALL: ALL PRESENT PROCLAMATION: PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK May 1 - 7,1996 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Merna Marshall; Sister City Association, Cinco De Mayo Fiesta, 5/4, 6 - lOpm, Kiwanis Club, $15 adult, $5 children 7-12. Call 374-4072 for tickets. Carol Risa: BCHD, Anxiety Screening Day, 5/1, South Bay Hospital Auditorium, loam to 7pm,. Call 374-4298 for more information. Cindy Demboski; 242 - 31st St.: Asked that Council make a final decision on the 31st Street fence issue. STAFF TO ADDRESS THIS. ISSUE AT THE 5/14/96 MEETING. Marjorie Fish; 3233 The Strand: Expressed disappointment with the condition of the north Strand wall and walkway. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS NONE 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on April 9, 1996. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March 1996 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of 4/16/96. (1) Recommendation to approve the Master Plan of Drainage and direct staff to seek outside funding for the implementation of the plan. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 16, 1996. RB/SE-MOTION TO DIRCT STAFF TO LOOK INTO REQUIRING NOTIFICATION TO BUYERS TEAT CERTAIN PROPERTIES ARE IN A FLOOD PLANE AND ALSO ADDRESS WHY Tilt -CITY ACCEPTS CLAIMS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE RATHER THAN REFERRING THEM TO UM COUNTY SINCE THESE ARE COUNTY STORM DRAINS. VOTE: 570 •R13/SE MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECT STAFF TO LOOK AT UTILIZATION OF MOBILE PUMPS TO MITIGATE FLOODING PROBLEMS. VOTE: 5-0 JR/JO MOTION THAT STAFF -WORK ON 'int PUMP ISSUE WREN THEY HAVE TIME, TOT ,A;.PRIORITY ISSUE. VOTE: 4-I (B'. NQ) ...... JR/SE MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON BALANCE OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS'. VOTE 5-0 2 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 96-1155 - " AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS OR AMENDING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELETING OUT-OF-DATE MATERIAL FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 15, 1996. JR/,IB MO'T'ION TO ADOPT. VOTE: 5-0 . .._.. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. TEXT AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING '111E DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROHIBITION OF ROOF SIGNS FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 15, 1996. JB/JR MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE: VOTE: 5,0 JB/JR MOTION TO WAIVE FURTHER READING OF VOTE: 5-0 RDINANCE, 3 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 7 TO ADD A - SECTION REQUIRING RUST RESISTANT COATINGS FOR EXTERIOR METALLIC SURFACES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 18, 1996. (Continued from meeting of March 26, 1996) JR/RB MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO AMEND ORDINANCETO REFERENCE SOME INDUSTRY STANDARD FOR RUST PROTECTION AND LIMIT REQUIREMENT TO STRUCTURAL/SAFETY TYPES OF WORK; RETURN AT A LATER MEETING WITH THIS INCLUDED AS PART OF A. LARGER "CLEAN-UP" ITEM. VOTE: 5-0 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 2, 1996. (Continued from meeting of April 9, 1996) JO/RB MOTION TO RETURN TO STAFF TO REVISE, USING SE'S VERSION FOR WORDING AND CITY AT'TORNEY'S' VERSION FOR FORM; AS FOLLOWS: REMOVE ALL REFERENCES TO "POTENTIAL" CONFLICT OF INTEREST. SECTION 2: STRIDE TO BE DERIVED..." AND AMEND TO READ "AND THAT MONETARY:>OR O"1HER CONNSIDERATION IS TO BE DERD.... SECTION 2: EXTEND 'MIL TIME PERIOD FOR NONOTIFICATION OF CONFLICT. SECTION 3: AMEND TO READ "ALL APPLICABLE' :STATE RAL' LAWS." .OT5-U 4 7. CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY. - Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. (Continued from meeting of April9, 1996) JO/JR MOTION TO.APPROVE CONCEPT' THE PARKING PLAN WiT1. DICTION TO STAFF TO LOOK INTO CREATING A FOURT I>DIAMOND, ADD NG 5' LANDSCAPE STRIP IN PARKI r1G LOT WITHOUT LOSING ANY PARKING SPACES, ELIMINATE TOT LOT AND TREES, PROVIDE ACCESS. TO EMERGENCY VEHICLES WITHOUT Tio NEED TO REMOVE BOLLARDS, HAVE TRAFFIC ENGINEER STUDY INGRESS/EGRESS .ISSUES ASSOCIATEDWITH. NEW ENTRANC:E/.EI' 'S. VOT 3 2 (Y2B/SNO) JO/SE MOTION TO CLOSE OFF PARKING ON OLD BASKETBALL COURT AREA. 3-2 (JBIJR NO).:.__ 8. FIRE FLOW FEE ORDINANCE REVENUES. Memorandum from Fire Chief Pete Bonano dated April 15, 1996. JO/SE MOTION TO CONTINUED ITEM TO NEXT MEETING, VOTE 5-0 9. DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION REQUEST FOR LOWER PIER AVENUE STREET CLOSURE DURING AVP WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP WEEKEND AND AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE RF.P. TO EVENT PROMOTER TO MANAGE STREET CLOSURE EVENT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 18, 1996. JR/SE MOTION TO APPROVE 1M STREET CLOSURE AND AUTHORIZE THE USE OF EVENT PROMOTER WITH PROVISION THAT THIS BE A "NO COST" EVENT TO 'I HL CITY, VOTE: 5,0. 5 10. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE / LOWER PIER AVENUE - CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 17, 1996. JB/JR 1) AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH IBI GROUP FOR PREPARATION OF CONSTRICTION DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR. LOWER PLEB AVENUE; 2) APPROPRIATE $152,000" FROM THE DOWNTOWN sysjinssBUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT FUND TO CIP #96460; 3) :REJECT ALL OTHER PROPOSALS, 4) DIRECT STAFF TOWORK WITH DOWNTOWN PROPERTY OWNERS IN DEVELOPING AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; AND, 5) DIRECT STAFFTO, RETURN WITA PLAN TO INSTALL PARKING METERS ON UPPER.PIER AVENUE AND CREATE CONSISTENT HOURS OF ENFORCEMENT FOR ALL METERS,. VOTE: 44 (RB -NO) 11. BANNER PROGRAM - CONTRACT FOR FABRICATION, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 16, 1996. JOSE .MOTION TO CONTINUED H EM TO NEXT•MEETIN( VOTE; 5-0 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. TELECOMMUNICATIONS, FEE LIMITATIONS (SB1896 - COSTA). Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 17, 1996. JR/JB THAT CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE A LETTER OF OPPOSITION TO SB1$96 IN IT PRESENT FORM.: VOTE: 5�-0 b. REO HEST FOR ADDITIONAL AGENDA TOPICS FOR THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 30, 1996. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 18, 1996. CANCEL 4/30/96 JOINT MEETING AND RESCHEDULE FOR FUTURE DATE. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 6 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request by Councilmember Benz to direct staff to explore methods of curbing excessive appeals. ........................................................................................ CONTINUETO NEXT MEETING ...................................................................................... b. Request by Edgerton to create a sub -committee to meet with officials in Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach and, if necessary, Jane Harman to discuss Century Cable's plans to implement rate increases for cable television service. CONTINUE TO NEXT MEETING CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT AT 11:59PM TO CLOSED SESSION TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, APRIL 25, 1996 AT 5:OOPM. 7 Where there is no vision the people perish HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOMEI By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or orally. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet compilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agenda is developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allotted. L� In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, ifyou need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204. Please provide enough time to enable us to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. GLOSSARY Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law -or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager... The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. The embattled president of, a company who had just finished a stormy session with his officers, took it out on his secretary. "Miss Jones," he demanded, 'Where is my pencil?" "Why, Mr. Smith," the frightened girl replied, "it's behind your ear." - "You know how busy I am!" shouted the man. 'Which ear?' !Remember, Secretary's Day is Vednesdaa, 54pril 24th! AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 23, 1996 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK Julie Oakes Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER J. R. Reviczky John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Robert Benz Stephen R. Burrell John Bowler CITY ATTORNEY Sam Y. Edgerton Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PROCLAMATION: PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK May 1-7,19% PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS NONE 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on April 9, 1996. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March 1996 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. 2 (e) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning - Commission meeting 'of 4/16/96. (f) Recommendation to approve the Master Plan of Drainage and direct staff to seek outside funding for the implementation of the plan. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 16, 1996. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 96-1155 - " AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS OR AMENDING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELETING OUT-OF-DATE MATERIAL FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 15, 1996. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. TEXT AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROHIBITION OF ROOF SIGNS FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 15, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive further reading of ordinance. 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 7 TO ADD A SECTION REQUIRING RUST RESISTANT COATINGS FOR EXTERIOR METALLIC SURFACES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 18, 1996. (Continued from meeting of March 26, 1996) RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive further reading of ordinance. 3 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 2, 1996. (Continued from meeting of April 9, 1996) RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive further reading of ordinance. 7. CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. (Continued from meeting of April 9, 1996) RECOMMENDATION: Provide staff direction. 8. FIRE FLOW FEE ORDINANCE REVENUES. Memorandum from Fire Chief Pete Bonano dated April 15, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive further reading of ordinance amending the Fire Flow Fee Ordinance (Ordinance No. 88-932) to authorize the usage of fire flow fee revenues to purchase and/or upgrade fire fighting equipment and vehicles. 9. DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION REQUEST FOR LOWER PIER AVENUE STREET CLOSURE DURING AVP WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP WEEKEND AND AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE R.F.P. TO EVENT PROMOTER TO MANAGE STREET CLOSURE EVENT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 18, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: To conceptually approve the request and authorize issuance of an R.F.P. for an event promoter. 10. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE / LOWER PIER AVENUE CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 17, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Authorize City Manager to negotiate a contract with IBI Group for preparation of construction documents and specifications for lower Pier Avenue; 2) Appropriate $152,000 from the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Fund to CIP #96-160; 3) Reject all other proposals; 4) Direct staff to work with downtown property owners in developing an Assessment District; and, 5) Direct staff to return with a plan to install parking meters on upper Pier Avenue and create consistent hours of enforcement for all meters. 4 11. BANNER PROGRAM - CONTRACT FOR FABRICATION, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 16, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Approve an award of contract for the services of AAA Flag and Banner Manufacturing Co. in the amount of $25,230 for fabrication and installation; 2) Authorize Mayor to execute and City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) Authorize the Director of Community Development to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council, upon completion of the work; 4) Authorize the expenditure of funds upon receipt of contributions from various sponsors currently being collected by the Chamber of Commerce; and, 5) Authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes as necessary within budget. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. TELECOMMUNICATIONS, FEE LIMITATIONS (SB1896 - COSTA). Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 17, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council authorize a letter of opposition to SB 1896 in it present form. b. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL AGENDA TOPICS FOR THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 30, 1996. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 18, 1996. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request by Councilmember Benz to direct staff to explore methods of curbing excessive appeals. b. Request by Edgerton to create a sub -committee to meet with officials in Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach and, if necessary, Jane Harman to discuss Century Cable's plans to implement rate increases for cable television service. 5 CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on March 12, 1996. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YS002665 Name of Case: Carrillo v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YCO20233 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 6 5PRD = eq- -9� • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 23, 1996, at the hour of 7: )&P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - �— " ' e l ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes Absent: None PROCLAMATION: PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK May 1 - 7, 1996 Mayor Oakes ANNOUNCEMENTS: (� a'1 n ✓� '7 �wv tQ�Q�P�� -7,1r.J 1 PUBIalt PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your • comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing.to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to' one minute. Citizens may also speak:. (1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; (2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, (3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management of departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. Coming forward to address the Council at thisstime were: Y07-0- )i"--;`�,0r,. r�-� s oc,44el-may /0q;1--71 $--e- City Council MinAtes 04-23-96 Page 9092 y,1111`' aefl OS) / 1.1. e c;- 3/"22f- c /--t9 v ✓c \ �� est _0,-.-) .- 2.- , ,-2---ll � L_I) t-aA s'3• /"d', — -z d v ale' 2.9( eft? -62 1/,,1 ,5 n #(6` _ - - /' AY G, ( ) \- �^ Y • • ) 14" 4t) )/Q)A Y/ !' CM &, --))--)y L7 r • • • • At 7:5 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting with item 4. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. Councilmember requests to remove items from the consent calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) and the public may comment on the Consent Calendar items that have not been removed at this time. Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (f), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (a) Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 1 io one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) (b) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING 1) Minutes of the Regular Meeting 1996. Action: To approve the minutes of the April 9, 1996 as ******** MINUTES: held on April 9, Regular Meeting of RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 6443 THROUGH 6585 INCLUSIVE AND NO. 6963, AND TO APPROVE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NOS. 6268 AND 6368 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9093 • • Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE MARCH 1996 FINANCIAL REPORTS: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the report that the March, 1996, Financial Reports are delayed due to preparation of the 1996-97 budget. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF 4/16/96. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file the action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of April 16, 1996. 0 (f) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE AND DIRECT STAFF TO SEEK OUTSIDE FUNDING FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 16, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report u9 and responded to Council questions. e', ) , L,�q /� d) /4"-"' /' FE/174 ft - City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9094 (, 9 Af-(2fr Kc, 4 b/ivr/ ie• -•44-,‘;-- 2 z o) -t -4f Action: To approve the Master Plan of Drainage and direct staff to seek outside funding for the implementation•of the plan. Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. )'-X2' X, _)--2,-) -,'T),---Lt ,7 2------41--( 04"1"41 CONSENT ORDINANCES • • (a) ORDINANC NO. 96-1155- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS OR AMENDING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELETING OUT-OF-DATE MATERIAL FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 15, 1996.. Action: To sdopt Ordinance No. _96-1155. Motion 1 D , second st) fr' . AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION Items 1( ), ( ), ( ), and ( ) were heard at this are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS SEPARATE time but consent 4. TEXT AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROHIBITION OF ROOF SIGNS FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 15, 1996. City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9095 -t6A5/ -7-7 .1 2 42 0)--)t-- ‘11 , Cse_x21 epc-f e 5-° • • • • Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. RECOMMENDATION: ordinance. Introduce and waive further reading of The public hearing opened at 7:5/ P.M. address the Council on this item was: The public hearing closed at 7: P.M. Coming forward to Action: 4To introduce_O dinance No.. 96-115(0.-3 Motion .4) -f -v, second The motion carried unanimous vote. by a Final - To r--. — . - Ordinance — - -- 9.6-1154.,entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW ROOF .SIGNS LOCATED ON PROJECTIONS ABOVE THE ROOF IF DETERMINED TO BE ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION." Motion & , second AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9096 TEXT AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 7 TO ADD A SECTION REOUIRING RUST RESISTANT COATINGS FOR EXTERIOR METALLIC SURFACES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated """" (Continued from meeting of March 26, 1996) Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 5:&O P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was 1----16'-`---2-r1( /41 ( - rir v 404— i (( ‘--1-')) - / ` l/'t-0-''�1 4 t 9 ; . e . - d,,?, ---, -' ^.. ((J, - .. g.;03,)), --zr'` LA EV )'.1e' Seeing no one come forward o address the Council on this • item, the public hearing closed at g:Oy P.M. C 7.0, Action: To introduce O dinance No._ 96=115, Motion , second . The motion carried by a 2/1 7. unanimous vote / 12).") V2)." 4.'11;9-4114—�//el J CC t V e e-----, �/�'`1 �E'inal Action: To waive_ further_reading of`O_rdinance No.) -2 96=115 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 7, SECTION 1 OF THE BUILDING CODE RELATING TO BUILDING REGULATIONS AND REQUIRING PROTECTIVE COATING OF EXPOSED METAL SURFACES, METAL HANDRAILS, GUARDRAILS AND STAIRRAILS." • Motion , second AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None MUNICIPAL MATTERS City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9097 • a -A -L 0 -1A -a) 6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 2, 1996. (Continued from ting of April- 9, 1996) 4.` 41.41 p,4.�G H City Manag presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. — ..4.---t.) ,-1 «- Loy- >> - ) ‘-'7,2,1A----)-27,4,-,/ d' �/ v --y �---t v \ r/c'r.r ic/--,-7.---,A. 4`-✓— ,--,p .< — `'--- C `�, Public participation opened at P.M. ' --- -' ) ---- ® / i:5 --)67-7%-"--d ' d'' d c- _ " / =-7=, 7 "1 ___ Public participation closed at P.M. 06) 'A-`---(/- fr 9 2---) ----z? - • Action: To Cintroduce Ordinance No. 96-115 .7 Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To waive further reading of rOrdinance—No.3 \96,11.5--4 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITIONS FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS.", AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive further reading of ordinance. 7. CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. (Continued from meeting of April 9, 1996) Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. 6e2-9 - "�z-v City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9098 /1 ca9,6"J‘l C - Cr'/ v `� v`_`� /9/, n . /D 4 X: - 1p ••-- cEN 2 49 er7 > t a ki5 A • r • Public participation opened at • P.M. O4 -46-/-j4 `7/V 5 — --5 r-- ‘---7. C-°:2->6 P1'4- -.2.----7 ,3 6) c72S '71------4-0) L----'-'--- Y a --A-; Yi-r d-0"---3. � (--0--- A-40, � � z � ) � .---, / Public participation closed at : ibP.M. ,.J. -g .ivziA° )7y7-4 le-- ar3 0/1 6°7 -� Q-3 .. 0) --) ( f.,j_ Action: Too`- 3 9----a-g--- t-----( r- a--7.,_40--_-, ._.,,,_ (4-4--, NL---- Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. , i'c— 9 ) , �.-..� 1 of V. -- .G-_- _i & W • RECOMMENDATION: Provide staff direction. 8. FIRE FLOW FEE ORDINANCE REVENUES. Memorandum from Fire Chief Pete Bonano dated April 15, 1996. Fire Chief Bonano presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at P.M. Public participation closed at P.M. Action: Tolntroduce_Ordinance_No._.96-115J 2 Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ord ce Nom c9.6 -115 -_, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 88-932 City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9099 AD • • RELATING TO FIRE FLOW FEES.", which would authorize the usage of fire flow fee revenues to purchase and/or upgrade fire fighting equipment and vehicles. Motion , second AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None 9. DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION REOUEST FOR LOWER PIER AVENUE STREET CLOSURE DURING AVP WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP WEEKEND AND AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE R.F.P. TO EVENT PROMOTER TO MANAGE STREET CLOSURE EVENT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 18, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at/0 C. /O :SS P.M. ,L2 • --v Ci�,,�Q ,` eL, fir- r V %; Y / ), 6-a-, a, i ,a -e -.--ft' 4.c"--"12A-(---"a'j /t 9,/,.-. ,2\ -7, — 94,,,P Klic participation closed at i j :0;1..P.M. ;-�/-7' ✓, ,-;/ >--- —yam ___/.ii, v Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) conceptually approve the request for a street closure of lower Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to the Strand on Saturday August 24, 1996 and/or Sunday, August 25, 1996, during the AVP world championships; and, 2) authorize the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission to issue a Request For Proposals (RFP) for an event promoter. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 4 , City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9100 • 10. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE / LOWER PIER AVENUE CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 17, 1996. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public articipation opened at //:e P.M. -d- 3- J '' Public participation closed at . P.M. 0,- ` 4 p -m. ")a • /ty.)/) ?r( ‘cs.)(;.1 y/L P times a/'/ ction:To approve the staf f .o emm ndation to : / — 1) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate a contract with IBI Group for preparation of construction documents and specifications for lower Pier Avenue; Appropriate $152,000 from the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Fund to CIP #96-160; 3) Reject all other proposals; 4) Direct staff to work with downtown property owners in developing an Assessment District; and, 5) Direct staff to return with a plan to install parking meters on upper Pier Avenue and create consistent hours of enforcement for all meters. Motion , second The motion carried by a nanimous vote. --ziL J(/(:6,7/C . BANNER PROGRAM. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 16, 1996. v • Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at P.M. City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9101 • • • Public participation closed at P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve an award of contract for the services of AAA Flag and Banner Manufacturing Co. in the amount of $25,230 for fabrication and installation of banners for 60 poles with two banners per pole; 2) authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) authorize the director of Community Development to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council, upon completion of work; 4) authorize the expenditure of funds, up to a total of $36,000, upon receipt of contributions from various sponsors, currently being collected by the Chamber of Commerce; and, 5) authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes as necessary within budget. Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. TELECOMMUNICATIONS, FEE LIMITATIONS (SB1896 - COSTA). Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 17, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize a letter of opposition to SB1896 in its present form. Motion , second . The motion carried by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council authorize a letter of opposition to SB1896 in it present form. City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9102 • • • b. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL AGENDA TOPICS FOR THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 30, 1996. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 18, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To Motion , second The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request by Councilmember Benz to direct staff to explore methods of curbing excessive appeals. Councilmember Benz spoke to his request. Action: To Motion , second . The motion CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9103 • • • ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on March 12, 1996. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YS002665 Name of Case: Carrillo v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YCO20233 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, April 23, 1996 at the hour of •P.M. to the Adjourned Regular Meeting of Tuesday, April 30, 1996 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 04-23-96 Page 9104 April 15, 1996 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Dear City Council Members: HELLO...I am Cyndi Demboski. My husband John and I have been the property owners of 242 - 31st Street for over 20 years. We lived in our first home for 10 years..moving only to accomodate our growing family. Since 1983, we have made every effort to'be good citizens and neighbors by selecting good tenants and maintaining our property. When the wicked winter weather of 1994 caused our 5 foot cedar grapestake fence to topple, we immediately set out to make _it appropriate. Our handyman told us that we needed to rebuild. We agreed on a price, we gave him money for materials, he removed the old fence and set the 4x4 redwood posts. Coincidentally, two of the residents were fueding about fence repairs and so one decided to call the city regarding my partially built fence. Upon notice that I needed to secure a permit, I began a journey that taken 12 YEARS...and I still do not have a fence. The fueding neighbors completed their projects..yet..,: 242 remains "red -tagged". I followed directions to go to City Hall and pay for a permit. With checkbook in hand, I went to "do the right thing". At this point, I was informed that the city was reviewing the codes and their enforcement...or rather lack there of. I attended several city council community meetings. I listened to my neighbofs..they heard my point of view and I was assured that the city council would now take the collective information under advisement and develop a policy. ONE AND ONE HALF YEARS LATER....THERE IS STILL NO POLICY AND I AM THE ONLY RESIDENT BEING INCONVENIENCED BY THIS UNREASONABLE DELAY. During these community meetings and numerous conversations with Ms. Oakes and Mr. Burrell, I was assured that a reasonable solution could be developed that addresses my specific situation. I understand that the city has a complicated issue to define and solve..HOWEVER, in light of the fact that I am the only resident without a fence which meets the need for security, privacy and appearance, I think it grossly unfiar that I should be penalized. I recommend that you walk down 31st Street. You will see that the vast majority of homes have fences that least 6 feet high..mostly made to survive for years and many come close to 9 feet. I understand your task is formidable...but how would you like to have fence posts instead of a reasonable fence. My house would look SILLY with a 42" fence. Take a look...I think my point will be made. As I told Mr. Burrell, this issue has taken on a new light...it :.. has cost me nice...clean...prompt pay tenants who have been good neighbors. I told Mr. Burrell back in October, when the tenants refused a one year lease that I was very concerned that this issue of reasonable privacy, security and appearance was going to cost me tenants. Unfortunately, my inclination was correct. I have enclosed a copy of their intent to vacate letter. I have been MORE THAN PATIENT. I am making a REASONABLE request. The city has taken a YEAR AND ONE HALF....without resolution. I believe that the time to worry about your long term plans should now be replaced with CONSIDERATION to me...a loyal tax paying citizen of this fair city. PLEASE allow the courtesy of my completion. I will meet the terms of your "TO BE DEVELOPED" codes and fees when you make your final decisions. In the meantime, I have wasted countless hours and now face financial complications because of your delays in responding. I have enclosed copies of the following: 1) Copy of lease..amended from the original one year to 6 month 2) Letter from Mr. Burrell dated 3-26-96 3) Letter of "Intent to Vacate" from my 12 year tenants. I am hopeful that you will be responsive to my request. I do not want to carry this to other available means of resolution. I hope that common sense will prevail and we can both move to brighter tasks. I hope to be able to attend the April 24, 1996 meeting. I am out of town on business 4-17 thru 4-21. I thank you in advance for your consideration of this request. Si erely, Crfdi Demboski Owner - 242 - 31st Street Hermosa Beach, Ca. Home - 541-6236 Office - 378-2278 April 7, 1996 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Demboski: The reason we are writing you is to inform you with our dissatisfaction with the front yard in regards to the fence. We have told you of this problem for some time now and the fence has been an on-going dilemma since we moved in, approximately a year and a half ago. Due to the lack of a fence, we feel our privacy has been invaded, we have a lack of security and the animals on the block use it as a place to relieve themselves. This on-going problem was our decision to vacate the property. We are disappointed at the city's action and that this issue could never be resolved. Larry Newell Chris Deford Evan Grossman vPyr.�y�f�®\\\\�\dsljeAA� X57.07 ,M�»���w1,�i��i�»»\Aiiiiiiiiii.M\ . °.° 1. PARTIES: / / 1 This Lease is made and entered into this day of 0414e -V- , 19_75— (( JJ . by and between �nri n �!L/Or �lt't� � _� / - O I--��1 (hereinafter re erred to as "Landlord") and ' anor Evid GRossribi 2. PREMISES: Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant hereby leases from andlord, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, that certain -1e4e mosrt B.ae-k- , State of eall' (o o.51 RESIDENTIAL LEASE (hereinafter referred to as "Tenant''). real property and the residence located thereon situated in the City of County of commonly known as 2'12--31 STS-Ilfged 3. TERM: The term of this Lease shall be for r - v commencing on Den L) r'7 19 ciSTand ending on 4. RENT: /Tenant shall pay to Landlord as rent for the Premises, the sum of I / 69?e�"i217 CE/X- O ($ 1q 0 6 )dollars per month, in advance on the first day of each month during the term hereof. Rent shall be payable without notice or demand'and without any deduction, off -set, or abatement in lawful money of the United States to the Landlord at the address stated herein for notices or lo,such other persons or such other places as the Landlord may designate to Tenant in writing. 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT: Tenant shall deposit with Landlord upon the execution of this Lease the sum of ($2-1109. ) dollars as a security deposit for the Tenant's faithful performance of the provisions of this Lease. If Tenant fails to pay rent or other charges due hereunder, or otherwise defaults with respect to any provision of this Lease, Landlord may use the security deposit, or any portion of it, to cure the default or compensate Landlord for all damages sustained by Landlord resulting from Tenant's default. Tenant shall immediately on demand pay to Landlord the sum equal to that portion of the security deposit expended or applied by Landlord which was provided for in this paragraph so as to maintain the s curity deposit in the sum initially deposited with Landlord. Landlord shall not he required to keep the security deposit separate from its general account nor shall Landlord be required to pay Tenant any interest on the security deposit. If Tenant.performs all of Tenant's obligations under this Lease, the security deposit or that portion thereof which has not previously been applied by the Landlord, shall be returned to Tenant within fourteen (14) days after the expiration of the term of this Lease, or after Tenant has vacated the premises, whichever is later. 6. POSSESSION: If the Landlord for any reason cannot deliver possession of the Premises to Tenant at the commencement of the term, the Landlord shall not be liable to 'tenant for any loss or damage resulting theretroni, but there shall be a proportionate deduction of rent; nor shall this Lease be void or voidable for a period of ten (10) days thereafter; and if for any reason the Premises cannot be delivered within said ten (10) day period, the Tenant may, prior to Landlord's delivery of the Premises, declare this Lease to be null and void and all money paid to Landlord shall be refunded to Tenant. 7. USE: It is agreed that the Premises shall be used only for residence purposes, for one family consisting of r62P_ adults and �% O children, and no animal and for no other purposes whatsoever. Tenant in his possession, use and occupancy of the Premises agrees to observe and comply with all restrictions, laws and ordinances affecting said property or occupancy thereof; and Tenant further agrees that no use shall be made of the Premises, nor acts done which will increase the existing rate of insurance upon the Premises, or will cause a cancellation of any insurance policy covering the Premises. 8. UTILITIES: The Tenant shall pay for all water supplied to the Premises and shall pay for all gas, heat, light, power, telephone service, and other services supplied to the Premises, except as herein provided. 9. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE: The Landlord shall at its sole cost and expense keep and maintain the exterior walls, roof, electrical wiring, heating system, air conditioning system (if any), water heater, built-in appliances, and water lines in good and sanitary order, condition, and repair, except where damage (if any) has been caused by the abuse or negligence of the Tenant, in which event Tenant shall repair same at his sole cost and expense. Except as herein provided, Tenant hereby agrees that the Premises are now in a tenantable and good condition and shall at his sole cost and expense keep and maintain the Premises, appurtenances and every part thereof, in the manner in which they were received, reasonable wear and tear excepted, including household furniture, fixtures, goods and chattels belonging to the Landlord, so that they shall remain in good and satisfactory order, condition and repair. The TEr41%f agrees to maintain landscaping, swimmingpool (if any) and Tenant agrees to adequately water said landscaping— (Jg a/1i tve uJ t^Pe --(i-0 S ec2Yr7 Ce�s�� a7i-pe-TS' 10. ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS: �tve �i�pjc f G, w 4. p T f ,r,,e rj Tenant shall not, without the Landlord's prior written con ent;' i k(fny I erattens, Im ovemen s or additions in or about the remises C! 4U/ and any additions to or alterations of the Premises (with the exception of movable furniture) shall at once become a part of the realty and belong to ac-)feavec0 the Landiord. The Tenant shall keep the Premises free from any liens arising out of any work performed, materials furnished or obligation incurred by the Tenant. iel/e31j Isere mcerl ado' essl (months/years),// 196/6 11. HOLD HARMLESS: Tenant shall indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from and against any and all claims arising from Tenant's use or occupancy of the Premises or from any activity, work, or things which may be permitted or suffered by Tenant in or about the Premises including all damages costs, attorney's fees, expenses and liabilities incurred in the defense of any claim or action or proceeding arising therefrom. Except for Landlord's willful or grossly negligent conduct, Tenant hereby assumes all risk of damage to property, including household furniture and goods, or injury to person in or about the Premises from any cause, and Tenant hereby waives all claims in respect thereof against Landlord. ti 12. DAMAGE TO PREMISES: ter` (a) If the Premises are so damaged by fire or from any other cause as to render it untenantable, then either party shall have the right to �4:1 terminate this Lease as of the date on which such damage occurs, through written notice to the other party, to be given within fifteen (15) days after the occurrence of such damage; except that should such damage or destruction occur as the result of the abuse or negligence of Tenant, or its invitees, so as to render the Premises untenantable, the Landlord only shall have this right of termination. • WOLCOTTS FORM 988—RESIDENTIAL LEASE—Rev.1-1pa (price class 3) 00 CO M M c 1993 WOLCOTTS FORMS. INC. Before you use this form. read il, fill in all blanks. and make whatever changes are appropriate and necessary to your particular transaction. Consult a lawyer if you doubt the form's fitness for your purpose and use. Wolcotts makes no representation or warranty, express or implied. with respect to the merchantability or fitness of this form for an intended use or purpose. 1 rhl'Ihf/TAZCWs...vwci7/AW\\.\./f'ffgx%\\\\\W 7/;-:.7.\-‘\\.\\\XA.V7i7.497//frANYAVANN Should this right be exercised by either landlord or Tenant, then rent for the current month shall be prorated between the parties as of the• /' date on which such damage occurred and any prepaid rent and unused security deposit shall be refunded to Tenant. (b) If this Lease is not terminated as provided in this paragraph 12, the Landlord shall promptly repair the Premises and there shall be a proportionate reduction of rent until the Premises are repaired and ready for Tenant's occupancy, such proportionate reduction to be based upon the extent to which the making of repairs interferes with Tenant's reasonable use of the Premises.�r;" 13. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: Tenant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign, transfer, sublet, mortgage, or otherwise transfer or encumber all or any part of �'� Tenant's interest in this Lease or in the Premises without Landlord's prior written consent which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The !S; consent to one assignment or subletting shall not be construed as consent to any subsequent assignment or subletting. 14. DEFAULT: It is agreed between the parties hereto that if any rent shall be due hereunder and unpaid, or if Tenant shall default and breach any other covenant or provision of the Lease, then the Landlord, after giving the proper notice required by law, may re-enter the Premises and remove any property and any and all persons therefrom in the manner allowed by law. The Landlord may, at its option, either maintain this Lease in full force and effect and recover the rent and other charges as they become due or, in the alternative, terminate this Lease. In addition, the Landlord may recover all rentals and any other damages and pursue any other rights and remedies which the Landlord may have against the Tenant by reason of such default as provided by law. 15. ABANDONMENT: Tenant shall not vacate or abandon the Promises at any time during the term of this Lease. 16. ENTRY BY LANDI.ORD: The Tenant shall permit the Landlord and/or its agents to enter into and upon the Premises at all reasonable times and upon reasonable notice for the purpose of inspecting it or for the purpose of maintaining the Premises, or for the purpose of exhibiting the Premises to prospective purchasers or tenants. 17. ATTORNEY'S FEES: If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connection with this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's tees and costs of suit. 18. SURRENDER: On the last day of the term of this Lease, Tenant shall surrender the Premises to Landlord in good condition, broom clean, ordinary wear and tear and damage by fire and the elements excepted. 19. HOLDING OVER: If Tenant, with the Landlord's consent, remains in possession of the Premises after expiration or termination of the term of this Lease, such possession by Tenant shall be deemed to be a tenancy from month-to-month at a rental in the amount of the last monthly rental plus all other charges payable hereunder, and upon all the provisions of this Lease applicable to such a month-to-month tenancy. 20. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: Each provision of this Lease performable by Tenant shall be deemed both a covenant and a condition. The terms, conditions and covenants of this Lease shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto, their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 21. NOTICES: Whenever under this Lease a provision is made for any demand, notice or declaration of any kind, it shall be in writing and served either personally or sent by registered or certified United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed at the address as et forth below: TO LANDLORD AT:'�� CC�c�j Ci, "t . etoa - TO TENANT AT: r n{.OSa. -Belt .e -t1 ed 4/0;151 Such notice shall be deemed to be received within forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing, if mailed as provided for in this paragraph. 22. WAIVERS: No waiver by Landlord of any provision hereof shall be deemed a waiver of any other provision hereof or of any subsequent breach by Tenant of the same or any other provisions. 23. TIME: Time is of the essence of this Lease. 24. JOINT AND SEVERAL OBLIGATIONS: "Party" shall mean Landlord and Tenant; and if more than one person or entity is the Landlord or Tenant, the obligations imposed on the party shall be joint and several. 25. OPTION TO EXTEND: Provided that Tenant shall not then be in default hereunder, Tenant shall have the option to extend the term of this Lease for additional MO n-14.1- (month/year) periods upon the same terms and conditions herein contained, except for fixed minimum monthly rental, upon delivery by Tenant to Landlord of written notice of its election to exercise such option(s) at !east sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the original (or extended) term hereof. The parties hereto shall have thirty (30) days after the Landlord receives the option notice in which to agree on the minimum monthly rental during the extended term(s). If the parties agree on the minimum monthly rent for the extended term(s) during that period, they shall immediately execute an amendment to this Lease stating the minimum monthly rent. In the event that there is more than one option to extend the term of this Lease, the parties hereto shall negotiate the minimum monthly rent as set forth herein for each extended term of this Lease. If the parties hereto are unable to agree on the minimum monthly rent for the extended term(s) within said thirty (30) day period, the option notice shall be of no effect and this Lease shall expire at the end of the term. Neither party to this Lease shall have the right to have a court or other third party set the minimum monthly rent. of JStubti - � Com`'Ch ,, �n �'._ingineij Cr�rtL1¢ ' mct be. a by2 � . di i �f� f1 � a / d -i i►x- a- '� The parties hereto have executed this Lease on the date first above written. LANDLORD: TENANT: By: By: By: By: B FREE Screening for Symptoms of America's Number One Mental Health Problem -- ANXIETY Symptoms Include: Nervousness Phobias Sleeplessness Excessive Worrying Fatigue Panic attacks Feeling Keyed Up Irritability Problems Concentrating Muscle Tension Racing Heart Obsessions/Compulsions If you or someone you care for suffers from any of these symptoms, you may be one of the 28 million Americans who suffer from an anxiety disorder each year. FREE HELP is now available on MAY 1, 1996, National Anxiety Disorders Screening Day . Come to the location listed below to fill out a written self -test, receive free educational materials, talk one-on-one with a mental health professional and receive a referral if appropriate. DATE: May 1, 1996 NAME Beach Cities Health District Panic Assistance League TIME: 10:00 AM to 8:00 PM LOCATION: South Bay Medical Center 514 N. Prospect, Redondo Beach Hospital Auditorium For General and Scheduling Information CALL: 310-374-4298 i -Vs94 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 9, 1996, at the hour of 7:09 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Missy Sheldon, resident ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes Absent: None PROCLAMATIONS: MEDAL OF VALOR WEEK APRIL 22-26, 1996 Mayor Oakes read the proclamation to commemorate the heroism and self-sacrifice displayed by the South Bay Police and Firefighters, to recognize the recipients of this year's awards and all past recipients of the Medal of Valor Award, and to proclaim the week of April 22 - 26, 1996, as Medal of Valor Week. Accepting the award were Carol Duff and Bobbie Oldaker from the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Police Chief Val Straser. NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK APRIL 14-20, 1996 Mayor Oakes read the proclamation which honors the significant role that libraries play in enabling citizens to reach their full potential, urged all citizens of Hermosa Beach to participate in library activities and make use of all library services, and proclaimed the week of April 14 - 20, 1996, as National Library Week NATIONAL CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH APRIL, 1996 Mayor Oakes read the proclamation which stated that the amount of child abuse in our country had reached epidemic proportions, stressed the importance of all citizens recognizing and helping to prevent child abuse, and proclaimed the month of April, 1996, as National child Abuse Prevention Month. PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTATION OF CHECK FROM HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE To FirstNIGHT Missy Sheldon, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, presented a check in the amount of $2,500 to Donna Love and Jane Turner, President of Arts Hermosa, to start the fundraising for the third annual FirstNIGHT, 1997. PRESENTATION OF CHECK FROM HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB TO THE HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9070 a 4 Paul Amarillo, Hermosa Beach the -proceeds of the Kiwanis' of $2,121.12, to Community accepting on behalf of the Foundation. Kiwanis, presented a check from Holiday Tree lot, in the amount Resources Director Mary Rooney, Hermosa Beach Community Center ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Oakes announced that the City was presenting a plaque of appreciation to Ron Pizer, formerly of the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission, to recognize him for his service on behalf of the City. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Sheila Donahue Miller - 77 17th Street, said that she had read the report in the "Easy Reader" regarding the decrease in crime in the downtown area and suggested that the Police downtown foot patrol be discontinued in order to use the money somewhere else; John Tarnowski - announced that he was seeking pledges that would total his goal of $2,500, by May 4, 1996, for the "California AIDS Ride", a seven day journey in which he would be participating by bicycling from Los Angeles to San Franciso; and, Carol Duff - Chamber of Commerce, announced that the Chamber was launching a program to encourage people to shop in Hermosa Beach by bringing their sales receipts to the Chamber office to be entered into a monthly drawing for cash prizes and for more information to call the Chamber office at 376-0951. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (n) with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (e) Benz, (h) Edgerton, (j) Edgerton, (m) Benz and (n) Reviczky, and noting that Councilmember Benz registered a no vote on item 1(1). Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9071 (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting held on March 26, 1996; and, - 2) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on March 26, 1996. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting of March 26, 1996, and the Regular Meeting of March 26, 1996, as presented. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 6287 THROUGH 6442 INCLUSIVE. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR DISCRETIONARY REGIONAL FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CROSSWALKS AND HANDICAP RAMPS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated March 27, 1996. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 96-5799, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUNDS UNDER SB 821 AND APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF ITS BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN PLAN." (e) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA AND THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO FORM A MULTI-JURISIDICTION CONSORTIUM TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXISTING PRACTICES AND DEVICES FOR CONTROLLING URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTANTS AT CATCH BASINS AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 1, 1996. Supplemental Memorandum from Councilmembez Benz dated April 7, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. Public Works Director Amirani, City Manager Stephen Burrell and City Attorney Michael Jenkins responded to Council questions. Action: To direct staff to investigate the feasibility of using the proposal in Councilmember Benz's supplemental memorandum as a pilot program at one catch City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9072 basin in order to divert the water flow into the storm drain. Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Proposed Action: To receive and file the agreement and not send the $5,000, providing that this was not an express condition of the NPDES settlement. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Bowler, Reviczky and Mayor Oakes. Final Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve the agreement between the City of Santa Monica and the City of Hermosa Beach to form a multi-juridiction consortium to evaluate the effectiveness of existing practices and devices for controlling urban runoff pollutants at catch basins; 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement; and, 3) direct staff, with Councilmember Benz's permission, to forward his supplemental memorandum to the multi - jurisdictional subdivision for evaluation and possible implementation. Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Oakes. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz and Edgerton to the first two items. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE USE OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER LAWN BY THE RIWANIS CLUB TO OPERATE A CHRISTMAS TREE LOT FOR THE 1996 HOLIDAY SEASON. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1996. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the ninth year of the use of the Community Center lawn by the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club to operate a Christmas Tree lot for the 1996 holiday season, with the understanding that all terms will be met and a donation will be made to the Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation of ten percent of the net profits or $1,000, whichever is greater. (g) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE IMG - INTERNATIONAL VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT; A DAY AT THE BEACH TRIATHLON - SPRINT TRIATHLON; AND EVIAN VOLLEYBALL CHALLENGE 961 - JUNIOR TOURNAMENT FOR THE 1996 SEASON AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACTS. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to: 1) approve the following beach events for the 1996 season: a) IMG - International Volleyball Tournament for June 20 23, 1996, for total fees of $34,510; City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9073 b) A Day at the Beach Triathlon - Sprint triathlon for October 13, 1996, for total fees of $6,738; and, c) Evian Volleyball Challenge '96 - Junior Tournament for April 28, 1996, for total fees of $1,865; and, 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the contracts. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE KEEPING THE CURRENT LEASE RATE OF $.93 SO. FT. THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 FOR ROOMS IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 2, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Community Resources Director Rooney responded to Council questions. City Manager Stephen Burrell also responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file the report and Community Center costs and rental policies budget hearings. Motion Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion c unanimous vote. review the during the arried by a (i) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF 3/20/96. Action: To approve the recommendation to receive and file the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission action minutes of the regular meeting of March 20, 1996. (j) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIM AND REFER TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 3, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. Personnel Director Blackwood responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to deny the following claim and refer it to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: Claimant: Victor, Stephani Date of Loss: 12/19/95 Date Filed: 3/28/96 City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9074 Allegation Alleges City negligence and dangerous condition on public property contributed to personal injuries. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (k) RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND THE CITY POLICY WITH REGARDS TO POSTING METERS AND PARKING SPACES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS AND FILMING WITH TEMPORARY NO PARKING SIGNS AS FOLLOWS: 1) METERS, PARKING LOTS AND TIME LIMIT SPACES IN THE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL BE POSTED AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE; AND, 2) NON -METERED SPACES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL BE POSTED AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 3, 1996. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to amend the City policy with regard to posting meters and parking spaces for special events and filming with Temporary No Parking signs as follows: 1) silver meters, parking lots and time limit spaces in the commercial and residential areas shall be posted at least 24 hours in advance; and, 2) gold meters and non -metered spaces in residential areas shall be posted at least 72 hours in advance. (1) RECOMMENDATION FOR MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT TO 95-96 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REIMBURSABLE CONTRACT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT TO REMOVE ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS TO THE DISABLED AT CITY HALL. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve the amendment to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) reimbursable contract for the implementation of the project to remove City Hall architectural barriers to the disabled; 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the amended contract. Councilmember Benz registered a "no" vote on this item. (m) RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL TO OPEN NEGOTIATIONS WITH ALLRIGHT CAL. INC. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Manager Stephen Burrell responded to Council questions saying that an agreement was needed before the summer months but this proposed negotiation would not exclude discussion with other companies or even handling City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9075 the parking lots in-house if that were the most economic method. - Action: To direct staff to meet with Allright Cal., Inc. for the purpose of negotiation and return with a proposed agreement extension for Council review and approval. Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (n) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION MEETING OF 4/3/96. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To: 1) direct staff to return with an item for the Council to review regarding the in -lieu parking program in the downtown area; 2) include the request by Hennessey for in -lieu parking funding; and, 3) approve the recommendation to receive and file the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission action minutes of the regular meeting of April 3, 1996, with the exception of item 4.5 - Review of In -Lieu Parking Program. Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Oakes. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, spoke regarding the downtown. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 96-1154 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM M-1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 330 AND 342 ARDMORE AVENUE AND INCLUDING 615 THIRD STREET' (THE SE CORNER OF ARDMORE AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET) AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 27, 1996. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 96-1154. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9076 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(e), (h), (j), (m) and (n) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. At 7:58 P.M., after considering item 1(e), the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting with item 4. Prior to the public hearing, the following action was taken regarding Municipal Matters: Action: To continue item 8 to the regular meeting of April 23, 1996, and to place items 7 and 9 at the end of the agenda in order to consider whether to continue those items also, or to hear them at that time. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND PARKING PLAN TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT/TAVERN, WITH ON -SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT, INTO THE ADJACENT EXISTING RESTAURANT SPACE, AND THE ADDITION OF A 600 SOUARE FOOT ROOF SEATING AREA, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 8 PIER AVENUE, "HENNESSEY'S". Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April' 2, 1996. Supplemental information for items 4, 5 and 6 submitted April 4, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:04 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Sheila Donahue Miller - 77 17th Street, appellant, expressed her concern with the proliferation of liquor licenses in the downtown area that would make it difficult for retail establishments to exist in the same area; expressed concern with the lack of a demolition permit, the lack of an asbestos containment plan or check, and the lack of a Coastal Commission permit; said that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was a very complicated process that must look at the area as a whole and the impact upon traffic, parking, residents, crime patterns and many other issues; and, said she felt the negative declaration was not warranted nor adequate; City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9077 Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, appellant, said that a total of eleven people had filed this appeal; said this project and the other two being appealed tonight had a major cumulative impact on the whole City through crime and parking problems and it also created alcohol and social problems; questioned if the City could enforce the mitigating conditions it had placed in the CUP to reduce noise as doors and windows were left open, as evidenced by citizen complaints, and the City did not or could not monitor to determine that these conditions were met; said this was an intensification in the use through longer hours, entertainment and general alcohol rather than beer and wine; said he had questioned Planning Commissioner Dettelbach's potential conflict of interest and now was asking Councilmember Bowler to step down from hearing this item due to his association with the Restaurant and Tavern Owners Association and his ownership of a restaurant serving alcohol that he might expand into the downtown area. City Attorney Michael Jenkins said that the test of a conflict of interest was if approval or denial would have a material financial impact of plus or minus $10,000 for the person voting and it would have to be Councilmember Bowler's decision. Councilmember Bowler said he had no way of determining the exact amount of financial impact that the new businesses could have on his business but if they were approved they would be his competitors so could not increase his business. Continuing to come forward to address the Council on this item were: Chantel Tenace - Hermosa Beach, said that a story in the "Easy Reader" had quoted Mr. Lissner as saying that he had placed 150 pieces of mail in area mailboxes regarding the effect of these projects and that it was a federal crime for anyone other than a postal worker to put anything in a person's mailbox; asked what the City was going to do about that crime; Joel Ball - L. A. Beach Press, said his publication had done extensive demographic research and polls that showed a majority of the people in Hermosa Beach wanted restaurants and bars and felt the Council should deny the appeals; John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, spoke in support of the project; City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9078 Bill Bastian - End Zone Sports Bar owner, said he welcomed the competition and applauded the venture; Jerry Newton - Hermosa Beach, said that an appeal was costly to the developer and that the Council should look at the process that allows one person to appeal a project; said that at the very least a small cost bond should be required of the appellant; Patricia Spiritus - Hermosa Beach, said that the downtown was being preserved by these new business ventures; said the revitalization of the downtown was causing building owners to retrofit the buildings rather than just tear them down; Paul Hennessey - Redondo Beach, Hennessey owner, said he was upset by some of the comments of the appellants and considered them untrue; said that he was doing no demolition or building, but that the building was undergoing a seismic retrofit by the owner; said that there had been an asbestos study done; said that he had never had a liquor license violation in over twenty years of business and that he was expanding into a space that had been a restaurant with a liquor license; and, asked that if the Council approved his project, a copy be sent to the ABC as the appellants were also appealing his business expansion to the ABC; Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., project architect, said that Police Chief Straser has said that crime is going down as more upscale businesses go into the downtown area; said that both a building permit and a Coastal Commission permit have been applied for and that the seismic retrofit is being done by the building owner; Sheila Donahue Miller - 77 17th Street, appellant, spoke in rebuttal, said that bonds of the type mentioned by Mr. Newton were not allowed by the state; and, they were appealing these projects to exhaust their administrative remedies; and, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, appellant, spoke of the concentration of alcohol use in one area and the intensification of use; and said that he had found no record of an asbestos study with the City or with the AQMD. The public hearing closed at 8:40 P.M. Councilmember Bowler questioned Community Development Director Blumenfeld to ask: 1) was he confident that all aspects of the EIR negative declaration for CEQA had been satisfied; and, City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9079 2) was the project in question covered under the recent parking plan. Community Development Director Blumenfeld responded yes to both questions. Action: To deny the appeal, sustain the Planning Commission approval of the project and adopt Resolution No. 96-5800, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AS AMENDED, AND A PARKING PLAN TO ACCEPT FEES IN -LIEU OF PARKING, TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING BAR AND RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE ALCOHOL AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT INTO THE ADJACENT BUILDING SPACE TO THE WEST AND TO ADD A ROOF -DECK, AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 4 AND 8 PIER AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY 75 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 45 FEET OF LOT 5, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT." And with the direction to staff to notify the ABC of the Council approval of the project. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 5. AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NEW 6,200 SOUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITH ON -SALE BEER & WINE, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 844 HERMOSA AVENUE, "CALIFORNIA BEACH RESTAURANT". Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. Supplemental letter in opposition from Lenore Christine Landavazo, 841 Manhattan Avenue, dated April 4, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:42 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Sheila Donahue Miller - 77 17th Street, said that the same arguments she presented against approval of item 4 applied to this project; said this project was closer to residences that were just across the alley from the proposed business; said the CUP conditions have not been enforced with other businesses and would not be enforced with this one; said the negative declaration was not adequate; Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, said that people lived here because it was a City of residences; repeated his objection to Planning commissioner Dettelbach and Councilmember Bowler voting on these projects; said that these appeals had been filed by eleven people, not just one person; spoke of a letter from Day One in City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9080 Pasadena that detailed the problems that that City has with a concentration of alcohol establishment in a small area; said it was a cumulative effect and an intensity of use from beer and wine with a restaurant to general alcohol and the longer hours that were being allowed; said this project was being approved with six parking spaces on Palm Drive directly across from residences; said that more employees to an expanded business would be able to receive residential parking permits which would impact on the residential parking; and said that this was actually doubling the alcohol use as California Beach was moving from its present location and leaving a CUP for alcohol use there, as a CUP went with the land not the business; and, Joel Ball - Hermosa Beach, said that nearby residents to this project had purchased their homes in a commercial zone knowingly, so had no reason to complain; also said that Hermosa Beach had the lowest crime rate of any beach city from Malibu to Redondo; James Gastinon - Hermosa Beach, said that he had built his home in Hermosa Beach and had problems with the City, but they had been resolved and now he liked the City and wanted to stay here; and, said he wanted to be able to walk to a restaurant or a bar and liked the way the downtown area was progressing with many new fine dining and entertainment places near -by. The public hearing closed at 9:00 P.M. Councilmember Bowler questioned Community Development Director Blumenfeld to ask: 1) was he confident that all aspects of the EIR negative declaration for CEQA had been satisfied; and, 2) was the project in question covered under the recent parking plan. Community Development Director Blumenfeld responded yes to both questions. Action: To deny the appeal, sustain the Planning Commission approval of the project and adopt Resolution No. 96-5801, entitled, HA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER AND WINE, AND CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOSED RESTAURANT AT 844 HERMOSA AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 23 AND 24 OF TRACT NO. 1564.11 City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9081 Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 6. _ AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL, WITH MODIFICATIONS, OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 17,500 SQUARE FOOT MIXED OFFICE, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT BUILDING ABOVE A TWO-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON -SALE BEER & WINE (BREWPUB), OUTSIDE SEATING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 3, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 9:05 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Sheila Donahue Miller - 77 17th Street, referred to the letter written by Donley Falkenstien which listed many potential problems that might affect residents near the project; said that parking and traffic flow were two of the main problems as there was not adequate parking in the alley; said there was also a problem with noise from the project due to the out door seating being allowed; and, said there was no downtown revitalization plan available to determine if potential goals were being met; Gary Brutsch - Hermosa Beach, said it had been a disaster not having a plan when the former Baptist Church had been demolished; said this project was all within the code and the Council should approve the project; Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, reiterated his objection to Planning Commissioner Dettelbach and Councilmember Bowler voting on the project; referred to the letter from Falkenstien; said that this project added to the cumulative effect of liquor serving businesses concentrated in one small area; said 'there would be a greater parking problem in the neighboring residential area as employees would be eligible for residential parking permits to allow them to park on the streets; spoke regarding the City staff not being able to enforce the conditions of the CUP; and spoke of errors in the letter from Ein Steins; Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., said it was necessary for this site to be developed and this project had the mix that included retail and office space that the City was trying to encourage; City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9082 John Hales - 624 Eighth Place, said the former church structure had been just as large as the structure being proposed and felt this development would be a plus for the City; Richard Johns - Manhattan Beach, asked the Council to consider a re -vamp of the appeals process for development projects; asked that the City Council support long-time businessmen of the caliber of Mr. Hennessey and Mr. Ludwig; Joel Ball - Hermosa Beach, said this was a matter of supply and demand, that if there were no demand for restaurants and bars they would not stay in business; said let the consumers drive the market; Shea McColgan - 912 Ninth Street, said that these businesses were putting in hundreds of thousands of dollars into these projects and asked why they were being opposed; asked the Council to support all three projects; John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, said he supported the businesses; Bruce Rolls - Hermosa Beach, said he was happy with the downtown clean-up; Steven Roberts - "Cafe Boogaloo" owner, said he supported the downtown business expansion; and, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, appellant, said he would be just as concerned if the whole downtown area was being built with churches, as it was the cumulative effect of the liquor establishments on a small area; and, said he would like a vote for diversity rather than just restaurants that served alcohol. The public hearing closed at 9:29 P.M. Councilmember Bowler questioned Community Development Director Blumenfeld to ask: 1) was he confident that all aspects of the EIR negative declaration for CEQA had been satisfied; and, 2) was the project in question covered under the arecent parking plan. Community Development Director Blumenfeld responded yes to both questions. Action: To deny the appeal, sustain the Planning Commission approval of the project and to adopt Resolution No. 96-5802, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY MULTI -USE 'COMMERCIAL BUILDING ABOVE A TWO- LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE AND LEGALLY City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9083 DESCRIBED AS LOTS 16, 17, AND 23, TRACT NO. 1125, AND LOTS 18&19, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH." Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Final Action: To deny the appeal, sustain the Planning Commission approval of the project and to adopt Resolution No. 96-5803, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ON APPEAL, TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ON - SALE BEER AND WINE, OUTSIDE DINING AND LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1301 MANHATTAN AVENUE AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 16, 17 AND 23, TRACT NO. 1125, AND LOTS 18 AND 19, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH." Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. The meeting recessed at the hour of 9:37 P.M. The meeting reconvened at the hour of 9:55 P.M. and suspended the order of the agenda to go to item 10. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 2, 1996. Action: Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the regular meeting of April 23, 1996. 8. CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. Action: Mayor .Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the regular meeting of April 23, 1996. 9. ORDINANCE TO REPEAL OR AMEND CERTAIN OUT-OF-DATE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 27, 1996. Deputy City Clerk Naoma Valdes presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 96-1155 as amended by deleting sections 5, 6 and 7, relating to purchasing, and renumbering the sections. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9084 Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 96-1155, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS OR AMENDING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELETING OUT OF DATE MATERIAL FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Motion Edgerton, second Bowler. AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None 10. RELOCATION OF MULTI -WAY STOP SIGNS TO PROSPECT AVENUE AND MASSEY AVENUE FROM PROSPECT AVENUE AND HOLLOWELL AVENUE. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 2, 1996. Supplemental letter from Steve A. Crecy, 1148 Second Street, dated April 6, 1996, containing a petition with 34 signatures in opposition. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions and said that staff had no objection to deleting the second item in its recommendation and leave the stop controls at First and Second Streets. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 10:03 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Michael Cannada - 2326 Ralston Lane, father of children in the church school, said that 6,000 people use the church and 270 families have children in the school and it was very difficult to cross Prospect Avenue due to the traffic and the speed attained by the cars at that intersection; said it was a safety factor to move the stop intersection in order to make it more accessible to those using the church or the school; John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, spoke of the traffic on Prospect; said it should be for residential use only rather than a thoroughfare for commuter traffic; spoke of accidents.in the area; said he favored moving the stop intersection to Massey and keeping the stop controls at First and Second Street; and, Daniel Villa - 10038 Manhattan Beach Blvd., Lawndale, President of Parish Council, said he has had to act as a crossing guard at the intersection to allow children to cross the street; requested a temporary stop sign until a decision is made. Public participation closed at 10:09 P.M. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9085 Action: To direct the Public Works Department staff to notify the residents within a 300 foot radius of the proposed changes and to hold a public meeting (on a night - other than a Wednesday) as soon as possible to try to achieve a consensus on the course of action regarding the stop intersections and stop controls along that area of Prospect Avenue. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 11. CROSSING GUARD PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 10:15 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Chris Smith - 311 - 28th Street, asked that the Council not judge the public reaction to paying for crossing guards from the results of the March 26, 1996, vote on measure F, which many people saw as a last minute attempt to have people vote for the measure, but to remember that over 60 percent of the voters had voted in favor of a direct school crossing guard assessment last November; said that most people did view this as a public safety issue; and spoke in support of having older students act as crossing guards in areas close to the schools. Public participation closed at 10:16 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve the appropriation of $30,000 to the Crossing Guard Program to fund the program for the remainder of the school year; 2) provide general direction on the future of the Crossing Guard Program; and, 3) instruct the subcommittee, of Edgerton and Reviczky, to report back by the May 14, 1996, City Cbuncil meeting, with the Council direction that the sub- committee is to explore dual funding with the School District and to offer the assistance of the Police Department to train 7th and 8th graders to assume some of the responsibility of crossing guards. Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. 12. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG BEACH DRIVE / WALK STREETS SURVEY AND ISSUES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9086 Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Action: To form a sub -committee, of Reviczky and Mayor Oakes, to review the east side of Beach Drive and to come back to the Council with suggestions for: 1) commercial properties as distinguished from residential properties; 2) 24th Street properties as distinguished from the other properties; and, 3) the possibility of a parking lane on the east side of Beach Drive to eliminate front yard parking. And, to direct staff to: 1) pursue whatever means possible to ensure compliance from all property owners on the west side of Beach Drive; and, 2) provide exact dimensions regarding the property lines along Beach Drive. Motion Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 13. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE / LOWER PIER AVENUE CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 4, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Direct staff to review and develop alternatives for City Council consideration at the April 23, 1996 meeting; 2) direct that the Pier Reconstruction sub -committee, of Reviczky and Mayor Oakes, meet to provide input; and 3) direct that the decision on the IBI proposal to provide design services be considered at the April 23, 1996 meeting. Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 14. HERMOSA INN HOTEL EIR CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 4, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 10:35 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, questioned how the City could ensure bed tax compliance with 96 separate owners; and asked if C.C. and R.s had been developed that were available for City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9087 public viewing (Community Development Director Blumenfeld said that no C.C. and R.s had been developed at this time.) Public participation closed at 10:38 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve award of contract to EIP Associates' for the preparation and processing of an Environmental Impact Report in connection with the Hermosa Inn Hotel Project at a cost of $68,140 which will be paid by the hotel developer; 2) authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by City Attorney; 3) Authorize the Director of Community Development to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council upon completion of work; and, 4) authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes to the scope of work as necessary. Motion Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 15. REOUEST FROM ROGER BACON TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF TIME BANNERS CAN BE DISPLAYED ON COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 3, 1996. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 10:46 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, suggested that there be no limit on signs but to let the market determine the amount of signage thus saving time and money on staff enforcement; and, Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., said the City has gone through a lot of changes with the sign ordinance and felt that there should either be a sign ordinance that was enforced fairly for all businesses or nothing at all. Public participation closed at 10:50 P.M. Proposed Action: To direct staff to return with possible changes to the sign ordinance for the display of temporary signs and banners for a longer period. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Bowler, Reviczky and Mayor Oakes. Action: To appoint Councilmember Benz to review the sign ordinance and recommend ways to condense it. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9088 Motion Edgerton, second Mayor Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 16. RECOMMENDATION TO RETAIN GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND VENDOR TO COMPLETE CITY HALL FIRST FLOOR OFFICE REMODEL. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 2, 1996. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) award contract to Westcon Enterprises, Inc., a General Contracting Firm, to complete the first floor office remodel for the amount of $36,579; 2) award contract to Jules Seltzer Associates for modular walls and workstations for the amount of $79,414; 3) appropriate $92,730 of WT funds to cover remodel project costs; 4) authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes as necessary commensurate with budget and 10o contingency; and 5) direct staff to use CDBG funds wherever possible to comply with ADA requirements. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Benz and Edgerton. The meeting recessed at 11:10 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 11:16 P.M. and returned the order of the agenda to item 3, in order to continue with the pulled consent calendar items starting with number 1(h). 17. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 28, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To direct staff to prepare letters of support for the Mayor's signature for the following items: 1) AB2228 (Mazzoni) which deals with special education costs statewide and specific limits in Marin and Mono counties; 2) AB2797 (Aguiara) and SB1865 (Craven) would limit the City contribution to the amount paid in the prior year and with any growth in property tax revenue going to the City; and, 3) AB2828 (Sweeney) would allocate an unspecified amount of the state General Fund to partially repay local agencies for their contribution to ERAF. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9089 b. REOUEST FROM CITY OF COVINA FOR SUPPORT OF SB1977. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 3, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize letters of support for SB1977 which would shift one percent of the state sales tax to cities and counties on the basis of population. Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. c. REOUEST FROM THE AMERICAN OCEANS CAMPAIGN FOR RENEWAL OF THE OCS OIL DRILLING MORATORIUM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 26, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation and adopt Resolution No. 96-5804, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING RENEWAL OF THE OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING MORATORIUM AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO PROVIDE LONG TERM PROTECTION FROM OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING." Motion Reviczky, second Mayor Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. d. REQUEST OF METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT TO SUPPORT PROPOSED COLORADO RIVER PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 26, 1996. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file. Motion Benz, second Mayor Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 18. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None 19. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible items: a. Request from Councilmember Bowler for of a suggestion from resident Jack sister city in Ireland. Councilmember Bowler spoke to his request. City Council Minutes 04-09-96 future agenda consideration O'Hara for a Page 9090 Action: To approve the consideration of a Sister City in _Ireland. Motion Bowler, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, spoke in opposition of beach special events. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(a), Existing Litigation: Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach: Case No. YS002665, Superior Court - Torrance. 2) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: pursuant to Government Code 54957 - City Manager. Action: Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council, to continue the closed session to a date to be determined. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, April 9, 1996 at the hour of 11:55 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, April 23, 1996 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. � Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 04-09-96 Page 9091 VOUCHRE2 04/18/96 11:03 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6583 04/18/96 007119 CATHEDRAL HILL HOTEL 6584 04/18/96 007120 OTS SUMMIT 6585 04/18/96 001009 TOM THOMPSON CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION HOTEL ADVANCE/THOMPSON REG/THOMPSON/TRAFF SFTY CONF PER DIEM ADV/TRAFF SFTY CONF PARKING ADV/TRAFF SFTY CONF TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4317 001-2101-4317 001-2101-4317 001-2101-4317 ITEM AMOUNT 353.92 250.00 70.00 60.00 111 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 353.92 250.00 130.00 733.92 VOUCHRE2 04/18/96 11:03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 733.92 TOTAL 733.92 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 04/18/96 11:03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH,DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PARIS / TO _ INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FORsite-00ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DIRTOR DATE PAGE 3 r VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 04/18/96 10:46 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 6580 04/18/96 004928 COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FO SPECIAL REIMB/CLARK CASE EXP 705-1209-4324 15,716.29 15,716.29 6581 04/18/96 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-96 001-1103 228,372.76 PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-96 105-1103 7,394.96 PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-96 109-1103 636.53 PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-96 110-1103 23,373.95 PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-96 140-1103 75.52 PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-96 145-1103 1,189.90 PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-96 152-1103 83.99 PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-96 155-1103 448.45 PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-96 160-1103 9,936.77 PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-96 705-1103 2,297.17 273,810.00 6582 04/18/96 000026 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMEN RETIREMENT/4-1 THRU 4-15-96 001-2033 42,414.64 RETIREMENT/4-1 THRU 4-15-96 105-2033 977.70 RETIREMENT/4-1 THRU 4-15-96 109-2033 98.60 RETIREMENT/4-1 THRU 4-15-96 110-2033 3,346.16 RETIREMENT/4-1 THRU 4-15-96 140-2033 12.00 RETIREMENT/4-1 THRU 4-15-96 155-2033 86.80 RETIREMENT/4-1 THRU 4-15-96 160-2033 1,321.27 RETIREMENT/4-1 THRU 4-15-96 705-2033 294.39 RETIREMENT SURPLUS FUNDS 001-3915 16,725.55- 31,826.01 TOTAL CHECKS 321,352.30 VOUCHRE2 04/18/96 10:46 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 254,061.85 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 8,372.66 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 735.13 110 PARKING FUND 26,720.11 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 87.52 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,189.90 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 83.99 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 535.25 160 SEWER FUND 11,258.04 705 INSURANCE FUND 18,307.85 TOTAL 321,352.30 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 04/18/96 10:46 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY T(IAT THE AEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES / TO _ INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR .I(/KIg0 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. FINANCE DI CTOR BY DATE Y71 i PAGE 3 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 04/04/96 08:14 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 6443 04/04/96 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-96 001-1103 286,695.84 PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-96 105-1103 9,165.47 PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-96 109-1103 792.85 PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-96 110-1103 32,006.18 PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-96 140-1103 168.59 PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-96 145-1103 1,299.98 PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-96 152-1103 1.08 PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-96 155-1103 549.81 PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-96 160-1103 11,708.72 PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-96 705-1103 2,794.23 345,182.75 6444 04/04/96 000026 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMEN RETIREMENT/3-16 TO 3-31-96 001-2033 42,034.49 RETIREMENT/3-16 TO 3-31-96 105-2033 970.11 RETIREMENT/3-16 TO 3-31-96 109-2033 98.60 RETIREMENT/3-16 TO 3-31-96 110-2033 3,531.81 RETIREMENT/3-16 TO 3731-96 140-2033 22.35 RETIREMENT/3-16 TO 3-31-96 155-2033 86.81 RETIREMENT/3-16 TO 3-31-96 160-2033 1,259.01 RETIREMENT/3-16 TO 3-31-96 705-2033 294.37 RETIREMENT/3-16 TO 3-31-96 001-3915 42,034.49- 6,263.06 TOTAL CHECKS 351,445.81 e VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 04/04/96 08:14 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 286,695.84 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 10,135.58 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 891.45 110 PARKING FUND 35,537.99 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 190.94 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,299.98 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 1.08 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 636.62 160 SEWER FUND 12,967.73 705 INSURANCE FUND 3,088.60 TOTAL 351,445.81 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 04/04/96 08:14 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE EMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAG ��/ TO _ INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR 4W 'f1(/ ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DIR CTTOOR DATE VI7Y PAGE 3 VOUCHRE2 04/09/96 12:52 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6445 04/09/96 007017 ACCOUNTEMPS 6446 04/09/96 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 6447 04/09/96 003209 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR 6448 04/09/96 005179 AT&T 6449 04/09/96 000857 ATLAS FOODS INTERNATION 6450 04/09/96 006878 AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SO C 6451 04/09/96 007111 KENNETH BARKER 6452 04/09/96 004357 BAY CITIES PET HOSPITAL 6453 04/09/96 006409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS 6454 04/09/96 000163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 6455 04/09/96 005764 LYDIA BREE 6456 04/09/96 000413 BUILDING NEWS, INC. 6457 04/09/96 007109 ADAM BURT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TEMP FINANCE CLERK TEMP FINANCE CLERK RADIO REPAIR/POLICE RADIO REPAIRS/POLICE CELLULAR CHGS./MAR 96 CELLULAR CHGS/MAR 96 CELLULAR CHGS/MAR CELLULAR CHGS/MAR 96 CELLULAR CHGS/MAR 96' PHONE CHGS/THROUGH MARCH PHONE CHGS/THROUGH FEB. PHONE CHGS/FEB. PHONE CHGS/THROUGH FEB. PHONE CHGS/FEB. PHONE CHGS/THROUGH FEB. PHONE CHGS/THROUGH FEB. PHONE CHGS/THROUGH MARCH PHONE CHGS/MARCH PHONE CHGS/THROUGH MARCH PHONE CHGS/THROUGH FEB. PHONE CHGS/THROUGH FEB. PHONE CHGS/THROUGH MARCH PRISONER MEALS/MAR 96 CITATION PMT REFUNDS ASSESSMENT REBATE VET SERV/POLICE K-9/DINO ASPHALT PURCHASE/MAR 96 ASPHALT PURCH/MAR 96 PRISONER LAUNDRY/FEB 96 SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR 6458 04/09/96 003772 BUTLER BOXES & STAKES TREE STAKES & TIES 6459 04/09/96 005731 CA DISTRICT ATTY'S ASSO PUBLICATIONS/POLICE 6460 04/09/96 005631 CALIFORNIA CHARTER/K-T BUS/COMM RESOURCES TRIP BUS/COMM RES TFIP ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER AMOUNT 001-1202-4201 428.40 001-1202-4201 544.43 001-2101-4307 56.12 001-2101-4307 238.94 001-2101-4304 201.81 001-2101-4304 39.38 001-4202-4304 86.35 001-2101-4304 130.77 001-2201-4304 33.12 001-4204-4321 20.00 001-2101-4304 15.01 001-2201-4304 38.06 001-2101-4304 15.00 001-2101-4304 29.47 001-4202-4304 18.94 001-2101-4304 10.00 001-1206-4304 20.00 001-1208-4304 244.39 001-2101-4304 30.00 001-2101-4304 10.00 001-2101-4304 20.00 001-2101-4304 20.10 001-2101-4306 65.58 110-3302 90.00 105-3105 37.98 001-2101-4201 277.50 001-3104-4309 61.23 001-3104-4309 122.37 001-2101-4306 106.35 001-4601-4221 567.00 001-4201-4305 38.67 001-4601-4221 367.50 001-4202-4309 736.15 001-2101-4305 313.05 145-3409-4201 282.55 145-3409-4201 539.66 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 972.83 295.06 491.43 490.97 65.58 90.00 37.98 277.50 183.60 106.35 567.00 38.67 367.50 736.15 313.05 822.21 VOUCHRE2 04/09/96 12:52 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6461 04/09/96 005950 CALIFORNIA EMS AUTHORIT 6462 04/09/96 000262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVI 6463 04/09/96 007101 ARTHUR CAVANAUGH 6464 04/09/96 005180 VICKI CHANEY 6465 04/09/96 006838 PEGGY CHASE 6466 04/09/96 000978 GERALDINE CHRISTIE 6467 04/09/96 004534 CMP SUPPLY COMPANY 6468 04/09/96 000354 COAST IRRIGATION CO. 6469 04/09/96 004715 COLEN AND LEE 6470 04/09/96 006926 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 6471 04/09/96 007089 JOHN COUGHRAN 6472 04/09/96 007091 DONALD COX 6473 04/09/96 002971 JIM CUBBERLEY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PARAMEDIC RE-CERT/J. CARROLL JAIL SIGN ASSESSMENT REBATE SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR ASSESSMENT REBATE LASER PRINTER TONER IRRIGATION SUPP/MAR 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN IRRIGATION SUPP/MAR 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN IRRIGATION SUPP/MAR 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN LIABILITY ADMIN/MAR 96 ZONING & GENERAL PLAN MAPS ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR 6474 04/09/96 006331 DANA POINT RESORT HOTEL HOTEL/STC TRNG.-KEARIN 6475 04/09/96 000047 DANIEL FREEMAN MEMORIAL ANN. PHYSICALS/JAN 96 ANN. PHYSICALS/DEC 95 MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/POLICE CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 6476 04/09/96 000303 DEL AMO MOTORS 6477 04/09/96 007112 GREGORIO DELGADILLO 6478 04/09/96 005094 DENN ENGINEERS ENGRG SERV/SEWER PROJECT ENGRG SERV/HERM AVE PROJECT SEWER IMPROVEMENT SURVEY 6479 04/09/96 000154 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA SHELTER COSTS/FEB 96 6480 04/09/96 000267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT HIGHWAY MAINT/JAN 96 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2201-4317 001-2101-4309 105-3105 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 105-3105 001-1206-4305 160-3102-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-4202-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-4202-4309 001-2021 001-2022 705-1209-4201 001-4101-4305 105-3105 105-3105 001-4601-4221 001-2101-4313 001-1203-4320 001-1203-4320 001-2101-4311 110-3302 160-8408-4201 160-8408-4201 160-8408-4201 110-3302-4251 105-2601-4251 PAGE 2 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 125.00 125.00 120.32 120.32 37.98 37.98 735.00 735.00 378.00 378.00 37.98 37.98 473.56 473.56 62.09 1.27 1.27- 130.13 2.66 2.66- 121.29 2.48 2.48- 313.51 1,470.00 1,470.00 17.86 17.86 37.98 37.98 37.98 37.98 416.50 416.50 293.70 293.70 4,000.00 1,600.00 5,600.00 528.76 528.76 50.00 50.00 900.00 2,960.00 9,921.07 13,781.07 191.78 191.78 1,306.61 1,306.61 VOUCHRE2 04/09/96 12:52 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6481 04/09/96 000147 THE DEVELOPMENT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION FILM DEVELOPING FEB 96 FILM DEVELOPING FEB 96 FILM DEVELOPING FEB 9 FILM DEVELOPING/FEB 96 6482 04/09/96 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL FILM PURCHASE/MAR 96 6483 04/09/96 007072 RUTH DOOL 6484 04/09/96 001184 DUNCAN INDUSTRIES 6485 04/09/96 001498 DYNAMED 6486 04/09/96 007071 CLARA DZIEMINSKI 6487 04/09/96 002840 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 6488 04/09/96 000181 EASY READER 6489 04/09/96 007086 ENVIRON LLC 6490 04/09/96 005949 EPC FUND, C/O SGT G. JO 6491 04/09/96 007075 EXECUTIVE SERVICES 6492 04/09/96 006167 FAMILY FUN TIME 6493 04/09/96 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 6494 04/09/96 005314 FRY'S ELECTRONICS 6495 04/09/96 007076 PETER FUSZARD 6496 04/09/96 006604 CHRISTINA GAGE 6497 04/09/96 006216 GEOMATRIX CONSULTANTS 6498 04/09/96 007094 MARY GRODOWSKI 6499 04/09/96 001340 GTEL ASSESSMENT REBATE PARKING METER PARTS PARAMEDIC SUPP/MAR 96 ASSESSMENT REBATE COPIER MAINT/FEB 96 COPIER USE/JAN 96 PUBLIC NOTICES/FEB 96 1ST FLOOR REMODEL SERVICES SEMINAR REG./P. BONANO ADMIN/INVESTIGATIVE SERV SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR DELIV SERV/PUB. WORKS DELIV SERV/POLICE DELIV SERV/PUB WORKS DELIV SERV/BUILDING DEL SERV/`D.E.C. LASER PRINTER/POLICE FACSIMILE MACHINE MURATEC M102 CITATION PAYMENT REFUND SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR SOIL TESTING/13TH ST. PROJECT ASSESSMENT REBATE INSTALL PHONE LINE FOR FAX INSTALL PHONE -COMM. SERV. DEPT PHONE LINE INSTALL-FIN./CASH. 6500 04/09/96 007087 MATT HAMILTON CITATION PAYMENT REUND ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4202-4309 160-3102-4309 001-2101-4306 160-3102-4309 001-2101-4306 105-3105 110-3302-4309 001-2201-4305 105-3105 001-1208-4201 001-1208-4201 001-1121-4323 001-4201-4305 001-2201-4317 001-1203-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4202-4305 001-2101-4305 001-4202-4305 001-4201-4305 109-3301-4305 001-2101-5402 001-2201-5401 110-3302 001-4601-4221 160-8302-4201 105-3105 001-4202-4304 001-1206-4304 001-4201-5602 110-3302 ITEM AMOUNT 12.34 23.71 39.08 28.15 93.92 37.98 1,812.53 30.53 37.98 345.00 261.51 775.12 75.00 50.00 465.00 296.10 13.00 33.00 24.25 39.00 20.00 541.24 237.07 4.00 201.60 793.00 37.98 110.00 266.68 266.09 50.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 103.28 93.92 37.98 1,812.53 30.53 37.98 606.51 775.12 75.00 50.00 465.00 296.10 129.25 778.31 4.00 201.60 793.00 37.98 642.77 50.00 VOUCHRE2 04/09/96 12:52 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 6501 04/09/96 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CHECK SERVICES/MAR 96 6502 04/09/96 004108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SER WORKER'S COMP ADMIN/APR-JUN 96 6503 04/09/96 000322 HERMOSA ANIMAL HOSPITAL VET SERVICES/FEB 96 VET SERVICES/MAR 96 6504 04/09/96 002066 HERMOSA BCH CITY SCHOOL FIELD USE & MAINT./APR. 96 6505 04/09/96 000451 HERMOSA BCH FIREFIGHTER SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR 6506 04/09/96 007077 HERMOSA BEACH TRAVELODG REFUND BED TAX 6507 04/09/96 004075 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS 3/18/96 6508 04/09/96 006269 MIKE HESS 6509 04/09/96 -007092 CLARENCE HIMES 6510 04/09/96 007088 LELA HOLLADAY 6511 04/09/96 003432 HOME DEPOT 6512 04/09/96 007113 HTS MARKETING 6513 04/09/96 007105 THOMAS HUGHES 6514 04/09/96 007108 STACEY HUSTON 6515 04/09/96 006305 JESSE IBATUAN ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES ASSESSMENT REBATE CITATION PAYMENT REFUND BUILDING SUPP/MAR 96 BUILDING SUPP/MAR 96 BUILDING SUPP/MAR 96 COMMUNITY CENTER BANNER SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR THEATRE TECH 3-20-96 6516 04/09/96 005254 INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP COMPUTER EQUIP MAINT/MAR 96 COMPUTER EQUIP MAINT/MAR 96 MAC PC MAINT/MAR 96 6517 04/09/96 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE ELECT SUPP/MAR 96 ELECT SUPP/MAR 96 ELECT. SUPPLY/MAR 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN ELECT SUPP/MAR 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN ELECT SUPP/MAR 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN 6518 04/09/96 004740 JOHNSON & VORWERCK LEGAL SERVICES/JAN-MAR 96 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4201-4201 705-1217-4201 110-3302-4201 110-3302-4201 001-4202-4251 001-4601-4221 001-3114 705-1217-4324 001-2110 001-3895 105-3105 110-3302 105-2601-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4201 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 705-1209-4324 ITEM AMOUNT 2,787.64 8,400.00 35.00 35.00 500.00 230.00 64.75 1,638.83 50.00 7.70- 37.98 20.00 323.10 64.82 74.37 313.89 756.00 308.00 80.00 457.80 305.20 201.00 138.34 188.36 28.65 .58 .58- 175.04 3.57 3.57- 161.52 3.29 3.29- 500.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 2,787.64 8,400.00 70.00 500.00 230.00 64.75 1,638.83 42.30 37.98 20.00 462.29 313.89 756.00 308.00 80.00 964.00 691.91 500.00 VOUCHRE2 04/09/96 12:52 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME 6519 04/09/96 000444 TEREA JOHNSON 6520 04/09/96 002627 DONALD JONES 6521 04/09/96 007078 NOVENDA JOSEPH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION REIMS. MILES/POST CLASS REIMB. MILES/POST CLASS CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 6522 04/09/96 002474 EDMUND OR BETTY JUCEVIC ASSESSMENT REBATE 6523 04/09/96 000973 JEANETTE KARCHER 6524 04/09/96 001032 JOHN KEARIN 6525 04/09/96 007098 FANNIE KOUDOUNARIS 6526 04/09/96 002525 LA BELLE MARVIN 6527 04/09/96 000167 LEARNED LUMBER 6528 04/09/96 007079 EDNA LEHMAN 6529 04/09/96 003708 DENNIS LINDSEY 6530 04/09/96 000077 6531 6532 6533 6534 04/09/96 003628 04/09/96 003810 04/09/96 006797 04/09/96 002369 6535 04/09/96 000183 6536 04/09/96 007099 6537 04/09/96 000481 6538 04/09/96 007080 6539 04/09/96 007100 ASSESSMENT REBATE MEALS/STC TRAINING ASSESSMENT REBATE ASPHALT TESTING/MONTERY PROJ BUILDING SUPP/MAR 96 ST. LITE SUPP/MAR 96 BUILDING SUPP/MAR 96 BUILDING SUPP/MAR 96 BUILDING SUPP/MAR 96 BUILDING SUPP/MAR 96 BUILDING SUPPLIES/MAR 96 BUILDING SUPPLIES/MAR 96 BUILDING SUPP/MAR 96 ASSESSMENT REBATE SLOW PITCH LEAG. DIRECTOR LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVIC BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES MARCH 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN DIANNE LOUGHIN MAC WAREHOUSE DAWN MACK MALIBU CASTLE PARK CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH RAYMOND MATCHA MC CORMICK AMBULANCE SE R. MC CREARY ASSOCIATES BERNICE MCMAHON REIMB TUITION & BOOKS/SPRING 9 MAC PC SUPP/POLICE SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR TICKETS/COMM RES TRIP 1ST HALF MEDIAN MAINT/95-96 ASSESSMENT REBATE PRISONER EMERG. SERVICES MANAGEMENT,, RETREAT SERV. ASSESSMENT REBATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4312 001-2101-4312 110-3302 105-3105 105-3105 001-2101-4313 105-3105 160-8408-4201 001-4204-4309 105-2601-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4202-4309 001-4202-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4202-4309 001-4204-4309 105-3105 001-4601-4221 001-4202-4305 001-2021 001-2022 001-2101-4317 001-2101-4305 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4201 105-2601-4201 105-3105 001-2101-4201 001-1203-4201 105-3105 PAGE 5 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 222.82 222.82 96.56 96.56 50.00 50.00 37.98 37.98 37.98 37.98 84.00 84.00 37.98 37.98 3,187.50 3,187.50 11.40 185.97 39.35 7.58 247.70 33.51 7.85 53.66 26.72 613.74 37.98 37.98 2,425.50 2,425.50 206.92 4.22 4.22- 206.92 936.02 936.02 2Q2.25 202.25 511.00 511.00 242.55 242.55 633.88 633.88 37.98 37.98 597.00 597.00 1,450.00 1,450.00 37.98 37.98 VOUCHRE2 04/09/96 12:52 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME 6540 04/09/96 007102 ROBERT MERCER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT REBATE 6541 04/09/96 003599 MOORE RECREATION & PARK VALLEY PARK PLAY EQUIP PARTS 6542 04/09/96 001517 MUNICIPAL TOY COMPANY 6543 04/09/96 007097 HOLLIE MURRAY 6544 04/09/96 007093 CHARLOTTE MUSSER 6545 04/09/96 002490 6546 04/09/96 003493 SPRING PROGRAM SUPP/COMM RES ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO ANNUAL DUES/C. SWARTZ NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES 6547 04/09/96 002514 OFFICE DEPOT 6548 04/09/96 004142 OFFICE DEPOT 6549 04/09/96 005107 6550 04/09/96 000321 6551 6552 6553 6554 04/09/96 000575 04/09/96 007090 04/09/96 007095 04/09/96 000608 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION/CLEAN. OFFICE SUPP STOCK/MAR 96 OFFICE SUPP STOCK/MAR 96 OFFICE SUPP STOCK/MAR 96 OFFICE SUPPLIES STOCK FEB 96 OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVI 300,NOTICING/MAR 6, 96 300,NOTICING/ MAR 12, 1996 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE PACIFICARE MARGARET PARKER THELMA PAULY PEP BOYS 6555 04/09/96 007081 BRAD PIERCE 6556 04/09/96 000296 THE PRINT NETWORK 6557 04/09/96 007083 PSOMAS & ASSOCIATES 6558 04/09/96 003991 BARRY REED 6559 04/09/96 006110 OLIVIA REISSIG 6560 04/09/96 007084 LORNA REYNOLDS 6561 04/09/96 004061 SYLVIA ROOT COMPUTER HOOKUPS/MAR 96 COMPUTER HOOKUPS/MAR 96 COMPUTER HOOKUPS/MAR 96 REFUND OVERPMT./ INV 6706 ASSESSMENT REBATE ASSESSMENT REBATE BATTERY/SEWER TRUCK BATTERY/POLICE CITATION PAYMENT REFUND NON SCHOOL DAYS FLYERS COMM. RES. PROGRAM SUPPLIES PARKING LOT C SURVEY SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR SPRING CLASS REFUND SPRING CLASS REFUND MINUTES SEC/3-8-96 ACCOUNT NUMBER 105-3105 001-4202-4309 001-4601-4308 105-3105 105-3105 001-4201-4315 160-8408-4201 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-2101-4305 001-4101-4201 001-4101-4201 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-3840 105-3105 105-3105 160-3102-4311 001-2101-4311 110-3302 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4308 109-8160-4201 001-4601-4221 001-3893 001-3893 001-4102-4201 PAGE 6 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 37.98 37.98 415.78 415.78 193.00 193.00 37.98 37.98 37.98 37.98 95.00 95.00 110,510.95 110,510.95 795.82 45.45 254.52 1,095.79 66.56 66.56 232.75 111.75 344.50 3.64 61.31 126.40 191.35 20.00 20.00 37.98 37.98 37.98 37.98 54.11 88.41 142.52 2.00 2.00 48.71 11.37 60.08 4,980.00 4,980.00 2,579.50 2,579.50 35.00 35.00 47.00 47.00 120.18 120.18 VOUCHRE2 04/09/96 12:52 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6562 04/09/96 001578 ED RUZAK & ASSOC. 6563 04/09/96 001420 DOROTHY SCHEID 6564 04/09/96 003505 SHORELINE PRINTING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TRAFFIC ENG SERV/FEB 96 TRAFFIC ENG SERV/JAN 96 REIMB TRAVEL/POST CLASS BUILDING DEPT. FORMS 6565 04/09/96 006493 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR 6566 04/09/96 007103 IGNACIO SILVA DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 6567 04/09/96 006666 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC PROG PMT HERM AVE SEWER PROG PMT HERM AVE SEWER- PROG PMT HERM AVE SEWER PROG PMT HERM AVE SEWER 6568 04/09/96 003377 G. SCOTT SMITH SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR 6569 04/09/96 000113 SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUI FIRE EXT REFILL/FEB 96 FIRE EXT REFILL/MAR 96 6570 04/09/96 000170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS BILLINGS/MARCH 96 6571 04/09/96 000364 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 6572 04/09/96 007110 SHARLEEN TAIRA 6573 04/09/96 000124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 6574 04/09/96 003353 VISA 6575 04/09/96 007104 BRIAN WEISS 6576 04/09/96 007085 LYLE WILMARTH 6577 04/09/96 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS FINGER PRINT APPS/FEB 96 SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR PLUMBING SUPP/FEB 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN PLUMBING SUPP/MAR. 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN PLUMBING SUPPLIES/MAR96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN PLUMBING/SUPP MAR 96 DISCOUNTS OFFERED DISCOUNTS TAKEN MARCH EXPENSE/CITY MANAGER ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES ANIMAL TRAP REFUND ASSESSMENT REBATE PETTY CASH/2-28 PETTY CASH/2-28 PETTY CASH/2-28 PETTY CASH/2-28 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-3104-4201 001-3104-4201 001-2101-4312 001-4201-4305 105-2601-4309 001-2110 to 3/28 to 3/28 to 3/28 to 3/28 146-8141-4201 160-8408-4201 115-8141-4201 160-8141-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4204-4309 001-2201-4309 001-4204-4303 001-2101-4251 001-4601-4221 160-3102-4309 001-2021 001-2022 160-3102-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-4202-4309 001-2021 001-2022 160-3102-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-1201-4317 001-3895 001-2110 105-3105 001-1201-4317 001-1202-4317 001-1101-4319 001-4202-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 945.00 465.00 113.20 238.15 39.50 250.00 100,000.00 71,999.89 88,973.00 28,520.00 201.60 12.25 87.68 859.04 212.00 157.50 52.42 1.07 1.07- 224.14 4.57 4.57- 48.32 .99 .99- 216.41 4.42 4.42- 44.30 6.70- 50.00 37.98 20.00 35.00 37.21 20.00 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 1,410.00 113.20 238.15 39.50 250.00 289,492.89 201.60 99.93 859.04 212.00 157.50 541.29 44.30 43.30 37.98 VOUCHRE2 04/09/96 12:52 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 6578 04/09/96 000135 XEROX CORPORATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY ITEM DESCRIPTION CASH/2-28 CASH/2-28 CASH/2-28 CASH/2-28 CASH/2-28 CASH/2-28 CASH/2-28 CASH/2-28 CASH/2-28 CASH/2-28 CASH/2-28 to 3-28 to 3-28 to 3-28 to 3-28 to 3-28 to 3-28 to 3-28 to 3-28 to 3-28 to 3-28 to 3-28 XEROX METER USE & MAINT/FEB 96 6579 04/09/96 007106 JENNIFER YAMANE SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4202-4305 001-4201-4317 110-1204-4305 001-2101-4312 001-4601-4308 001-4101-4305 001-1206-4309 001-2201-4305 001-2101-4317 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4310 001-1208-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 6.31 12.00 .37 80.00 77.50 30.22 148.28 5.37 8.00 13.97 45.58 38.89 384.41 001-4601-4221 563.50 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 578.70 384.41 563.50 TOTAL CHECKS 484,741.94 VOUCHRE2 04/09/96 12:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 110 PARKING FUND 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 160 SEWER FUND 705 INSURANCE FUND TOTAL 42,530.44 3,613.34 5,000.00 2,340.68 88,973.00 822.21 100,000.00 229,453.44 12,008.83 484,741.94 PAGE 9 VOUCHRE2 04/09/96 12:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY LISTED ON/ AG S FOR IP/0 THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS / TO )0 INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE r 14/7i' PAGE 10 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 04/10/96 11:29 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 5963 03/05/96 006098 WONDRIES CHEVROLET 3 PATROL VEHICLES/POLICE 715-2101-5403 58,786.25 58,786.25 TOTAL CHECKS 58,786.25 VOUCHRE2 04/10/96 11:29 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 58,786.25 TOTAL 58,786.25 PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 04/10/96 11:29 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THF,,,DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED ON PAGES TO ^� INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER s FOR / vq 50 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DIRECTORRE/ DATE/Dr -`G PAGE 3 April 8, 1996 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council April 23, 1996 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the checks listed below. #6368 - 03/21/96 - Debra Lucas. $25.00. Account number 001-3405. Refund request cancelled. Check was returned. #6268 - 03/06/96 - Trigger the Digger. $1600.00. Account number 001-2110. Payee incorrect. Check was never mailed. Concur: Stephen R. Manager Noted for fi3'cal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director April 18, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council vL Regular Meeting of April 23, 1996 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS i April 30 1996 7:0012M JOINT MEETING: CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION May 14, 1996 Public Hearing: Text amendment to add youth hostel to C-2 permitted use list. Community Development Director Public Hearing: Appeal of Planning Commission approval of a CUP amendment to allow on -sale alcohol in conjunction with a restaurant at 50(a) Pier Avenue, Patrick Malloy's Steak House. Community Development Director Public Hearing: 2nd Quarter General Plan Amendment Community Development Director Canvass of votes - Measure F City Clerk Drainage Acceptance Agreement Public Works Director Revision to encroachment ordinance regarding 30th & 31st Streets Public Works Director Public Works Fees Public Works Director Lease renewal: Project Touch (Room 3) Community Resources Director Lease renewal: South Bay Free Clinic (Room 7) Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission meeting of 5/1/96. Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of 4/17/96. Community Resources Director Recommendation to deny claims Risk Manager May 23, 1996__ BUDGET STUDY SESSION - 7:00PM May 28, 1996 Public Hearing: Text Amendment to relocate Sections 7-1.7, 7-1.8 & Article IX from the Building Code to the Zoning Ordinance Community Development Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of 5/21/96. Community Development Director Monthly Activity Reports - April, 1996 All Departments Recommendation to deny claims Risk Manager June 6, 1996 DUDGET STUDY SESSION - 7:00PM Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council efre& (-0 3,196, April 18, 1996 City Council Meeting of April 23, 1996 CITY TREASURER'S REPORT, INVESTMENT REPORT AND FINANCIAL REPORTS FOR MARCH 1996 The City Treasurer's Report, the Investment Report, and the Financial Reports for March are delayed due to preparation of the 1996-97 Budget. NOTED: Stephen City Manager Respectfully submitted: Viki Copeland, Finance Director ACTION SHEET AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS April 16, 1996 7:00 P.M. Peter Tucker Chairperson Alan M. Dettelbach Vice Chairperson Joseph Di Monda Rod Merl Sam Perrotti 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call COMM. MERL ABSENT Section I Consent Calendar Any Planning Commissioner or public wishing to pull an item from below may request to do so at this time. 3. Approval of March 19, 1996, minutes ACTION: APPROVED (3-0, COMM. DI MONDA ABSTAINED) 4. Resolution(s) for adoption a) Resolution P.C. 96-15 approving Conditional use Permit, and Precise Development Plan, for a two -unit condominium project, and vesting parcel map #24451 at 1007 17th Street. b) Resolution P.C. 96-16 approving a Conditional Use Permit, as amended, to allow on -sale general alcohol, in conjunction with a restaurant, at 50A Pier Avenue. c) Resolution P.C. 96-17 to recommend amending the commercial permitted use list to add "youth hostel" as a conditionally permitted use in the C-2 and C-3 zones. d) Resolution P.C. 96-18 to recommend relocating Sections 7-1.7, 7-1.8 and Article IX from the building code to the zoning ordinance and changing the words BZA and building official to Planning Commission and Community Development Director respectively. ACTION: APPROVED (3-0, COMM. DI MONDA ABSTAINED). 5. Item(s) for consideration NONE le Section II Oral / Written Communications 6. Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. NONE Section III Public Hearing(s) 7. CUP 96-4 -- Conditional Use Permit minor amendment to extend the outside seating closing time from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. at 26 - 22nd Street, Bottle Inn Ristorante. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED TO HAVE FRI & SAT CLOSURE TIME AT 9:30 P.M., AND SUN-THU STILL CLOSED AT 9:00 P.M.(4-0). 8. CUP 96-5 -- Conditional Use Permit to allow on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant at 1040 Hermosa Avenue, Sushi Sei. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. ACTION: APPROVED (4-0). 9. CUP 96-6 -- Conditional Use Permit amendment to expand the area for restaurant, live entertainment and dancing, to add a banquet room, and outside dining at 58 - 68 Pier Avenue, Sangria Garden. Staff Recommended Action: To continue to May 21, 1996 meeting. ACTION: CONTINUED TO MAY 21, 1996 MEETING (4-0). Section IV 10. Staff Items a. Community Development Department activity report of February, 1996. b. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. c. City Council minutes of March 12 and 26, 1996. RECEIVED & FILED THE ABOVE (4-0). 11. Commissioner Items a. Requested by Commissioner Di Monda to consider Conditional Use Permit revocation for nonconforming use/structure out of business more than 90 days. DIRECT STAFF TO CONDUCT A SURVEY OF OTHER CITIES. 12. Adjournment 2 April 16, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 23, 1996 MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve and adopt the Master Plan of Drainage 2. Direct staff to seek outside funding for the implementation of the Master Plan of Drainage. Background: In March, 1995 the Public Works Department sent out requests for proposal for the preparation of a Drainage Master Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. AKM Consulting Engineers of Irvine were chosen as the most qualified. Over the past eight months AKM, in conjunction with ITX Technologies (preparation of background maps) and National Plant Services (video inspection), has thoroughly investigated every aspect of the city's storm drainage system. The intent of this study is to pinpoint the areas where drainage deficiencies were expected to occur, i.e. where flooding during storms is anticipated. The areas with the highest probability of flooding had additional studies completed to discern the most effective method of mitigating the problem. Analysis: In order to establish an accurate basis upon which to review the adequacy of the drainage structures in the City, a comprehensive survey of the existing conditions had to be compiled. First video tape of the existing storm drain system was taken to determine the condition of the lines. At the same time a map of the City's existing topography was developed by aerial photography. This photogrammetry established an elevation survey with 4 foot contours throughout the City. From this a final topographic map showing the changes in elevation, City streets and prominent surface features was developed. Next a new Land Use Map was created so that reasonable estimates on how stormwater runoff is if 1 concentrated could be established. For instance, runoff from roofs in a residential area will gather quicker and with more volume than runoff from a field in an open space area where some of the water will percolate into the soil. A determination of soil types was then observed to generate estimates on how much water will percolate and how much will runoff. Typically areas of sandy soil accept more water than areas with a loam type soils. Only after these variables were determined could an accurate hydrology study be performed. The Hydrology Map prepared from the information gathered gives a very accurate accounting on how storm water will drain throughout the City. The City has been broken into subareas, these subareas represent localized drainage locations which collect to a common low point called a sump. From these sumps storm water is generally collected into a storm drain which outlets onto the beach and into the ocean. The Hydrology Study allows the engineer the ability to look at how each subarea reacts in storms of different intensities. This modeling is used to determine the volume and time of concentration of storm water to a particular drain. The drain is then designed to accommodate these flows so that flooding will not occur. Each subarea is similarly analyzed and the corresponding designed drainage facilities are determined. The end result is the attached Master Plan of Drainage which gives an ultimate design for the City's existing and proposed drainage facilities in order to prevent flooding within the City of Hermosa Beach. This Plan also includes a prioritization of the necessary improvements within the City. The Hermosa Valley Area from Gould to Pier Avenue which is drained by the 16th Street Storm Drain has been determined to be the most seriously deficient area within the City. The storms of January and March of 1995 clearly verify our engineering and hydrology findings as homes, businesses and city improvements in this portion of town sustained considerable flood damage. Valley Park Drive, where it dead ends at Hermosa Valley School, is a particularly dangerous location in storms. This represents the low point in the valley and large volumes of water rush to this location. Stormwater there enters the 16th Street Storm Drain and outfalls on the beach and into the ocean. This system works fine until a storm of high intensity occurs. Storms are generally rated by how often, in the past, a rainfall of similar characteristics has occurred. For instance, a 25 year storm would be a storm of considerable magnitude as the probability that it is expected to be exceeded is only 1 in 25. A 10 year storm would be somewhat more expected, though the actual intensity of the rainfall would not necessarily be 2 1/2 times less than the 25 year storm. The winter storms of 1995 were probably of the 25 year variety. The recent study shows that the 16th Street Storm Drain will handle runoff from a 10 year storm, but a storm of greater intensity will overtax the system and cause flooding. The City has investigated six alternative methods of mitigating this deficiency. One theory is to relieve the overburdened 16th Street Drain by installing another storm drain to the beach. The other option is to slow the concentration of water to the 16th Street Drain by detaining it in basins until the drain has cleared enough to be able to handle additional flow. The six alternatives represent variations of these two basic approaches. The construction of a parallel drain is extremely costly as it would require tunneling through the 70 foot high sand dune which lies between the Hermosa Valley and the beach. Estimates for detaining flows by constructing basins at Valley Park and Hermosa Valley School are considerably less expensive and more environmentally friendly. The drawback to the detention basin mitigation is that the Valley Park and Hermosa Valley School fields would experience some flooding for limited periods of time. As little recreational activity would be expected during a storm and a storm large enough to begin filling the basin would occur only once every ten years the cost to benefit for this alternative is clearly better than for the parallel drain mitigation. City staff has met with the Hermosa Beach School District Superintendent to review the possibility of allowing the use of the Hermosa Valley School field as a stormwater detention area. Ms. Gross' initial reaction to this request was quite positive but of course is predicated upon approval by the school board. The field, in order to function properly as a detention facility, would need to be regraded such that the field level would be lowered approximately six feet. City staff envisions sloping the edges of the field so that a natural amphitheater would be created. These sloped areas would provide excellent vantage points for spectators as well as a natural barrier preventing balls from leaving the field area. The City, of course, would be required to pick up all costs for the improvements including the installation of new sprinlder systems, turf and landscaping. A similar natural amphitheater/sump would be developed in Valley Park. The 16th Street Storm Drain Watershed Mitigation Project is the City's first priority storm drainage project and would relieve flooding in the Hermosa Valley Area, Pier Avenue, Beach Drive and other isolated small sump problems in northerly Hermosa Beach. The second subarea that shows serious deficiencies is that area along Valley Drive south of Pier Avenue. This area is served by an existing storm drain, the Valley Drive Storm Drain, which eventually outlets into the large Herondo Drain at Herondo and Valley. A major portion of the storm water tributary to this drain is generated in the southeast quadrant of the city, and is conveyed via storm drains located in 3rd and 8th Streets. Due to the insufficient capacity of the Valley Drive Drain, coupled with a potentially full Herondo Drain (storm water from sumps in Redondo Beach and Torrance is relieved by this large drain), the drainage system is severely deficient to provide adequate protection during a major storm event. Even lesser storms cause limited flooding along Valley Drive in this area. Furthermore, based on the video tape survey of this line, severe structural defects including collapsed pipe sections were identified in the Valley Drive Storm Drain between 2nd Street and Herondo Drive. Five alternates were evaluated to alleviate the deficiencies in the Valley Drive Line. The three major alternates include construction of parallel lines on Valley Drive and Herondo to accommodate the additional flows or to construct a detention basin on the Greenbelt to slow the concentration of flows. The third option utilizes the construction of a relief drain on 2nd Street to drain additional flows before they converge at the Herondo Drain. The other two alternates are combinations or variations of these three basic mitigations. The construction of parallel drain lines on Valley and Herondo is quite costly but would create the lowest overall impact to the area after construction is complete. Because the Herondo Drain flows full during a major storm event there currently is no capacity left to accommodate the flows from Hermosa Beach's Valley Drain and Hermosa Avenue Drain further to the west. Upgrades to the Herondo Drain must be addressed before other improvements can be instituted. Therein lies the draw back to this proposed mitigation: the lack of large amounts of funding needed to upgrade the Herondo Drain which in turn may delay any mitigation on the Valley Drain for some time. The second alternative mitigation also has it's weak points. The construction of a detention basin on the Greenbelt has it's obvious drawbacks including higher maintenance costs and the occasional closure of open space during storm periods. This mitigation would also still require that those damaged portions of the Valley Drain between 2nd and Herondo be replaced. Construction of a relief drain on 2nd Street seems to be the preferred alternative because this solution provides for full conveyance of tributary peak flows from the Valley Drain and therefor does not require upgrades to the Herondo Drain. This option will reduce the mainline flows in the Herondo Drain and in so doing also provides a betterment for those cities upstream of Hermosa Beach. Furthermore, by diverting all flow in the Valley Drive Storm Drain to the proposed 2nd Street Diversion Drain, the defective piping south of 2nd Street can be abandoned thereby saving the replacement cost for this work. The Herondo Street Watershed Storm Drain Project represents the second priority in the City of Hermosa Beach's Storm Drain Master Plan. This project would provide relief to flooding problems in southerly Hermosa Beach including the Valley Ardmore corridor, Hermosa Avenue, Beach Drive and other isolated areas in this portion of the city. Upon construction of this project and the previously discussed 16th Street Watershed Project 90% of the City's storm drain deficiencies will have been addressed. Fiscal Impact: The City currently has submitted grant applications for the two priority projects to the State of California Office of Emergency Services and the Federal Emergency Management Assistance in conjunction with their Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. This program is open to state and local governments which were in declared federal disaster areas following the Winter Storms and Late Winter Storms 1995. This program is highly competitive but would provide 75% of the required funding should these projects be selected. Staff has also arranged to meet with the Los Angeles County Public Works Department Flood Control Division and the State Water Resources Control Board in conjunction with the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project to review our Master Plan and to determine what other funding options may be available. Respectfully submitted, Joseph C. Mankawich Capital Improvement Program Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance Concur: Amy A,mira�ni Director : Public Works Stephen ' . y' x-11 City Manager Master Plan of Drainage City of Hermosa Beach • • • A Km CONSULTING ENGINEERS February 14, 1996 ! City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Attention: Ms. Amy Amirani • Director of Public Works SUBJECT: MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE - DRAFT REPORT Dear Ms. Amirani: • AKM Consulting Engineers 101 Pacifica, Suite 150 Irvine, California 92718 (71'0753-7333, Fax: (714)753-7320 AKM Consulting Engineers is pleased to submit this Draft Report of the Master Plan of Drainage for the City of Hermosa Beach. The report is the culmination of our comprehensive master plan study, and presents a systematic approach for relieving the drainage deficiencies in the existing storm drain systems serving the City. Also enclosed are two volumes of Appendices that include • the Existing Facilities Network Map and Database, CCTV Survey data, and back-up calculations for 10, 25 and 50 -year frequency storm hydrology of the study area. • The report includes an Executive Summary that summarizes our findings and recommendations. Priority 1 projects include the construction of two detention basins that will provide relieve to the existing Sixteenth Street Storm Drain system, and a relief drain (2nd Street Diversion Drain) along 2nd Street to divert flows from the presently damaged segment of Valley Drive Storm Drain and provide relieve to the Herondo Drain. Copies of previously submitted letter reports presenting our evaluation of alternate solutions for LACDPW's Sixteenth Street Storm Drain and Valley Drive Storm Drain, are included in Section • IV of this report. The selected solution for the Sixteenth Street Storm Drain is based on Alternative 4 of our letter report dated June 1, 1995, and includes the construction of a 27 acre-foot detention basin in Valley Park and a 10 acre-foot detention basin in the Hermosa Valley High School property. However, if the implementation of the proposed detention basin in the School property is found not to be feasible or desirable, our recommendation would then be to pursue Alternative • 6. Instead of the detention basin in the School property, Alternative 6 includes the construction of 60 -inch storm drains in private properties and construction of a 78 -inch tunnel in 19th Street providing a parallel relief system to the existing tunnel in 16th Street. All the recommended projects have been prioritized and summarized in Section V of this report. • The City of Hermosa Beach, in conjunction with other jurisdictional agencies (such as LACDPW), should expeditiously pursue the implementation of the facilities recommended under Priority 1 and Priority 2. • • City of Hermosa Beach Ms. Amy Amirani February 14, 1996 • Page Two AKM would like to acknowledge the support of you and your staff in the preparation of this study. We are looking forward to receiving you comments and input for the finalization of this report. If • you have any questions, please call me at 714-753-7333. Very truly yours, AKM Consulting Engineers • 4; 71 Yfrt f. 74 hrn&&Me Mohammed Rowther, P.E. Project Manager • • • • • • • MR/vh 7,1 KM • • • • • • Prepared by: • • MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DRAFT REPORT FEBRUARY 1996 AKM Consulting Engineers 101 Pacifica, Suite 150 Irvine, California 92718 Under the supervision of: Mohammed Rowther R.C.E. No. 37127 • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION I-1 I-1 STUDY APPROACH I-1 I-2 STUDY CRITERIA I-4 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS II -1 II -1 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION II -1 II -1.1 Drainage Area A 11-2 II -1.2 Drainage Area B II -4 II -1.3 Drainage Area C II -5 II -1.4 Drainage Area D II -5 II -1.5 Drainage Area E 11-5 II -1.6 Drainage Area F 11-6 II -2 EXISTING STORM DRAIN NETWORK II -6 II -3 EXISTING FACILITIES DATABASE 11-7 II -4 CCTV SURVEY DATA EVALUATION 11-7 II -5 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM II -11 III. MASTER PLANNED FACILITIES III -1 III -1 MASTER PLAN HYDROLOGY III -1 • 111-2 MASTER PLANNED FACILITIES III -1 III -2.1 Sixteenth Street Storm Drain 111-2 111-2.2 Valley Drive Storm Drain III -4 III -2.3 Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain III -5 III -2.4 Hermosa Avenue - Sixth Street Drain III -5 • III -2.5 Pier Avenue Drain III -6 III -2.6 18th Street Storm Drain III -7 III -2.7 22nd Street Storm Drain 111-8 111-2.8 26th Street Storm Drain 111-8 • III -2.9 35th Street Storm Drain 111-8 III -3 COST ESTIMATES III -9 i • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION Master Plan of Drainage PAGE W. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES IV -1 W-1 SIXTEENTH STREET STORM DRAIN SYSTEM IV -2 VALLEY STREET STORM DRAIN SYSTEM V. PROJECT PRIORITY V-1 TABLES Table 11-4A Table II -4B Table II -4C Table III -1 Table V-1 FIGURES Figure I-1 Figure I-2 Figure I-3 Figure I-4 • Figure II -1 Figure II -2 Figure II -3 Figure V-1 • Plate I Plate II • LIST OF TABLES PAGE Condition Index Score Values II -9 Results of Physical Inspection II -10 Distribution of SCI II -11 Preliminary Cost Estimates III -10 Summary of Priority Projects V-3 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE Location Map I-2 Study Area Map I-3 Land Use Map I-5 Soils Map 1-7 Existing Watershed Map 11-3 CCTV Survey Summary Map 11-8 Storm Drain Service Area Map 11-12 Project Implementation Plan V-2 Hydrology Map Insert Master Plan Facilities Map Insert ii • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • This report presents the findings, conclusions and recommendations resulting from a comprehensive master plan study of the storm drain facilities in the City of Hermosa Beach (City). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capacities and conditions • of existing storm drains in the City, identify drainage deficiencies, evaluate alternate solutions, and recommend prioritized list of improvement projects and their respective capital costs. • The study was performed in accordance with the hydrologic and hydraulic criteria set forth by Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW). In addition to the hydrologic and hydraulic evaluation of the existing and proposed storm drain facilities, the study included structural evaluation of a majority of the existing storm drains based on a closed circuit television (CCTV) survey of the system. • Following is a summary of the conclusions and recommendations of this study: • Due to the topographic characteristics of the study area, numerous drainage • deficiencies, caused by depressions in the ground surface (sump conditions) and flat street profiles, exist throughout the City. • The closed circuit television (CCTV) inspection of the existing storm drains in the City demonstrated that the system is generally in good condition. Except • for the following problem locations, most other defects identified were minor in nature: • • 1. One location of collapsed pipe condition in the 63 -inch RCP storm drain in Valley Drive between 2nd Street and Herondo Street. 2. One location of broken pipe in the 24 -inch RCP storm drain in Gould Avenue in the vicinity of El Oeste. 3. Two locations of broken pipes in 18 -inch connector pipes in 5th Street east of Pacific Coast Highway. • Although the defective pipe segments in item 1 and 2 above are proposed to be • replaced by facilities recommended in the master plan, all the above listed defects should be repaired as soon as possible. ES -1 • �_ KM • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage • A number of private properties in the City experience flooding, primarily due • to inadequate construction of driveway approaches and pad elevations and/or absence of curb and gutter in the streets. These local deficiencies have not been addressed in this master plan study, they should be handled by the City on case-by-case basis. • • Typically, storm drain outlets in sandy beaches are prone to problems and require high maintenance. Blockages, formed by sand deposited in front of or in the outlets, back up flows causing ponding in the low lying areas along Beach Drive and The Strand. Our recommendation to mitigate this problem is to utilize small diameter (18" to 24") shallow storm drains to exclusively • service these low lying areas. Their outlets should be in the vicinity of the outlets of larger storm drains draining areas at higher elevations. However the two systems should be independent of each other, so that runoff from higher areas is prevented from overflowing to the lower areas. • ■ Majority of the drainage deficiencies identified in this study are in areas with sump conditions that are tributary to existing storm drains with insufficient capacity to convey the tributary storm runoff. • • Implementation of recommended improvements should initially be targeted for construction of projects identified as Priority 1 and Priority 2 in Section V of this report. These projects have been identified to relieve sump areas currently experiencing flooding conditions during storms frequencies of less then 10 -year return. • • ■ Projects identified as Priority 3 are primarily extensions to the drainage system to service streets with insufficient flow capacities, or local sumps created by sags in the street profile. • Total capital costs for the implementation of the recommended drainage improvement projects under the three priority categories are as follows: Priority 1 $1,395,000 • Priority 2 $2,952,000 Priority 3 $3 746,000 Total $8,093,000 • Detailed description and cost estimates of the projects recommended under each priority category are included in Section V, Project Priority, of this report. ES -2 • A ion • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage SECTION I INTRODUCTION The City of Hermosa Beach is comprised of an area of approximately 1.35 square • miles in the southwest portion of Los Angeles County as shown on Figure I-1, Location Map. The Study Area, as shown on Figure I-2, is bounded by Manhattan Beach to the north, Redondo Beach to the east and south, and Santa Monica Bay (Pacific Ocean) to the west. • The Study Area is comprised of approximately 887 acres, which includes the area within the boundaries of Hermosa Beach and approximately 25 acres of Manhattan Beach that drains to Hermosa Beach. Hermosa Beach boundaries extend to 36th Street, 35th Street, 33rd Street and Artesia Boulevard in the north; Pacific Coast • Highway, Harper Avenue and Reynolds Lane in the east; Herondo Street in the south; and in the westerly direction to The Strand along the Pacific coastline. • • • • I-1 STUDY APPROACH This study was performed by AKM Consulting Engineers, under contract with the City of Hermosa Beach, with Dicatek, Inc. and ITX Technologies as subconsultants. Following is an outline of the tasks performed in the preparation of this master plan study of the storm drainage facilities serving the City of Hermosa Beach: 1. Gathered and reviewed all available data and relevant studies. 2. Performed aerial photogrammetry and developed a digitized topographic base -map of the City, at 1"=100' Scale with 4 -foot contours. This task was performed by Dicatek, Inc. 3. Developed an existing storm drain network map and database in format that is consistent with the City's Infrastructure Management Plan. This task was performed by ITX Technologies. • 3. Performed hydrology study for 10, 25 and 50 year frequency storms and identified deficiencies in the existing storm drains serving the City. I-1 • KM • • • • • • • • • • • ........;� ",!.(,'"---0,,o 2 ,-:� 7,�-..I ► • /,��. ._` n jam\ f" J'�61 � os .� ,W"r cls sii.s` j. .!�'•�•j!j. ` i Vail - 1t1''nr* _ --C77%,116'"---'510164a �� y 4 1 a� r�� ` o f 7 4.� t � �v,„„c)f' N�\1L5•o;'isBn� ,/ a .,`�a J f 1III7r-1.1F F. anoga IIdIP:I u. • . ,� • `-1,- \t--" .. ,r s to �6nd!t� „Ii ►� tl3• �w Q 1UMW i rr • l ,•-�-')..,500 �����,,�� oA���::ur; . • q�,,T��'.al � lfi F(i.TR _'.. �,-`, °I bop elm �3 Mjlls � "'.. ` ., j . •d and ncino .� ye, �a �7 '" �� '. IIs .. `'1- G 9�•.�' yTl ,, 'r �� �!V111.4... ' �: ''� •• '�- - ��; I -i ale •jl y ` ., i b Q ,1\ t I .011' �.j . i ... le` * s• � -� ,, \► •.:..c .. •. y I a -',044.i ` �d71�:; •\\ r j1 �l•• ccPpQQ 1 (1`i i.��- sl� ��•v* • % i i IS P . .•�OOr ..40.4..4,1.........\ int 'i\- ific _ . 1I — —� lisa.� �,� I�i�Ii.+ \\`��e'�f•�}�■ a Q ��- �`� w, .�: j v Par iii^ �''S• y� I s.o . s S• La u6rf ZOI _ . 0.,.:-`�--► Malibu P . 1" �1' �l;4u'.T4',. dl' . Santa Monica .� r' 4_ ._ ► � M� , nhyt• ;�` . Point Dume p IONAL •EATION 'fF �,�y_ , y - Venic- • _ ��}{y!�� -•1•� :;;,, uu / c �'J-*:, �� �acleQ•8•. SAN F° $ °nom .4 MONICA BAY ��►i iii. .4•„ ►` i'Iif; � ©�Se II •.; :*�•> ta• a . - • a El Segundo `. n 0�•,'�y�'�,'• oo Manhattan Beach •441 I7� ' . •'I • tiiiefeli at • ,M i lyd �AtNI�a'w-.: - VM►. . �t HERMOSA *bre 5� (Ct)�•, • —� soo 4 a �i�:i 1L�� ,:1��1Maui \= ;t ;�! • I . BEACH `'''_711B 9I ' 1F O o; ��ili tiTT;i 1Redondo Beac Ai •ft U F' Lake `l*J' CM* • • • Estates \„trawl/Ai•aj' des Pt -P. Hitlso ft. ill• %�A.° ” ' ,.co�.r E• H •.e.' s. to Poi me dr !l��,�C aY • ok .nl � v^ pedf° eal Beac �� � , IL°LIFE' / 11 A �. i , Palos : - Sa�— Sunset .in V II Beac\` 'nt•Fermin in ! Rp c °p HUNTINGTON. �s 6,44, "4 too 7®0�_, r1•� a er w\\,—,—,--,, ' \` \ : EACH \. Newport I5, OU • O // I // Beac' 55 .4 : it� Lag.. iN 300 Base map from U.S. Department of the Interior Geological Survey State of California, South Half, 1981 0 8 16 MILES I MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LOCATION MAP FIGURE I-1 • • • • • • • • • • • oii , r ' . J. IT (r5.4,,,L _` VAI ----- Y .. I +�, �,� \-1"-411 RI IOWA._ CMI �� riaiiliIr 11�i' VCR MB MEM •= t ► =irk ��II1►Ji�iN1Mal ®L 4 i, *7-1E -116111- -WITT- 161:41rIMIMIMITIIIMISTA ,mistv NAN nom 13311211 Mill*M1411.4 A. 01_11 mait wawa aw: MA Sat SO �, ��!;`°� � 9Ai1I�i\�� �1 ,�3 �. �� IM{A EOM i1<( rs! , ,,.4� ,4. = ,i41t146-1;41•Ar •AAI II flI1 Il II I �J� �`+ Ilininl M------- �.' °\ -tto• p -„l .� a) ° PltalapomOtIt, b0 wrr ~ :.. \ r 7MIR�Il//� �3 . 00%, omit fi- 4y�x liferew,c-104, re k. 0 oeta.. HS las Ili _ MA ' "I I lQ,4,,}` � NortK ` %.:•.44_,.t . ,A.® Il• I ra . I i ii+l�' 'eA,,,- = t v� � 1b �+�� �V' )- -..`,` 4��"�G�� �y��� ! � � I ' , 44,,10 wry t~;d,\moi `� ;�1-Aja-1\ ,* r4� ��T�1c!��� t1�'✓M�F1aC?�?1`�- 1: ski°� r l.::' if-rGv�,111„. �effe A9F � �8l�Si `�` ' +)J °ems �' � � \i�ijt,iri�#' , �' ..Oo .' l e— I v 77,1 eaue Base map from U.S. G.S. 7.5' series (topographic) Venice and Redondo Beach Quadrangles, CA, Photorevlsed 1981 EXPLANATION STUDY AREA RIDGE LINE CITY LIMITS 0 W 2000 4000 FEET A MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH STUDY AREA MAP FIGURE 1-2 • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage 4. Assessed capacity and condition of existing facilities. ITX developed • condition rating of the existing storm drains based on review of CCTV data provided by the City. 5. Developed and evaluated feasible alternate solution to alleviate system deficiencies, and recommended the most viable solutions for • implementation. • • • • • • 6. Developed project priority and capital costs for implementation of the recommended facilities. I-2 STUDY CRITERIA Hydrology models developed were in full conformance with the procedures outlined in the LACDPW's Hydrology Manual dated December, 1990. Following are the key factors used: ■ Since the study area is highly developed in its present condition, land use data used in this study was based on built -out conditions of the City's present Land Use Map, as shown on Figure I-3. Impervious factors (in percentage of gross area) used for each of the land use categories are as follows: , LAND USE CATEGORIES PERCENT IMPERVIOUS High Density Residential (HD) 86% Medium Density Residential (MD) 82 % Low Density Residential (LD) 66% General Commercial (GC) 95 % Commercial Corridor (CC) 95 % Neighborhood Commercial (NC) 92 % Commercial Recreational '(CR) 92% Specific Plan Areas (SPA) 92 % Mobile Home Parks (MHP) 82 % Industrial (IND) 92 % Schools (SCH) 40% Open Space/Parks (OS) 15 % I-4 KM MD NC LEGEND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 33 du/ao MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 25 du/ao LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13 du/ao SPECIFIC PLAN AREA GENERAL COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL RECREATION MHP MOBILE HOME PARK INDUSTRIAL 11# OPEN SPACE 11/ 1 r44aliitikNtigkr' ?.40fitY.; .P4OweflI' - tp,lpitp..qwr, e•••• a 6 AiL.,24,-,Igistaa MV,--- -I- --- r45.4: ..-03-41Ajtew t 2-, • • ,,,,,, ... il) 1 CE:3112=1 --3310 15 . . ritat 1000T FIGURE 1-3 AKM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 101 PACIFICAL SUITE 150 IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92718 1 (714) 753-7333 (714) 753-7320, FAX CITY Of NENNOSA MACK. CAL IFORNI A MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE LAND USE MAP • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage ■ The soil types as shown on Figure I-4, Soils Map, were taken from the • Hydrology Manual. The predominant soil types in the study area are Chino Silt Loam (Soil Identification Number 003) and Oakley Fine Sand (Soil Identification Number 010) for area lying to the west and east of Valley Drive, respectively. ■ The entire study area is in Rainfall Zone K, which has a 24-hour, 50 - year rainfall depth of 6 to 8 inches. ■ Flow routing and sub -area delineation were based on the topographic base map developed by Dicatek from aerial photographs dated March 6, 1995, and field verification. ■ Times of concentration were computed for all the sub -areas utilizing the Los Angeles County Time of Concentration computer program. ■ Computations for 10 -year, 25 -year (Urban Design Storm), and 50 -year (Capital Storm) hydrology were prepared for all the sub -areas utilizing the Modified Rational Method (MORA) computer software. ■ Hydraulic analysis and sizing of proposed facilities was typically based on the peak flows from the following design storms: (a) 10 -year frequency storm for storm drains in local streets; (b) 25 -year frequency storm for storm drains in major arterials; (c) and 50 -year frequency storm runoff tributary to sump areas. I-6 • Base map from U.S. G.S. 7.5' series (topographic) Venice and Redondo Beach Quadrangles, CA, Photorevised 1981 SOIL NO. 003 WI SOIL NO. 010 (K) RAINFALL ZONE CITY LIMITS MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage SECTION II EXISTING CONDITIONS II -1 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION The Study Area is an approximately 886 acre watershed lying adjacent to the Pacific Ocean coastline, just north of King Harbor in the Santa Monica Bay. Ground slopes in the watershed are generally mild in the north -south direction, and steep in the east -west direction. Surface flow patterns in the east -west direction are distinctly established by two major ridges that traverse the watershed in the north - south direction as shown on Figure I-2, Study Area Map. The easterly ridge (referred to herein as Ridge A), runs parallel to, and in the vicinity of the City's eastern Boundary Line. Approximately 37 acres of the study area lies to the east of Ridge A, and drains easterly to the City of Redondo Beach. Approximately 19 acres flow to Artesia Sump (also known as the Wylie Sump), located in the vicinity of Artesia Boulevard and Wylie Avenue, and the remaining 18 acres flow to LACDPW's' Bond Issue Project No. 1105 (Herondo Drain). The westerly ridge (referred to herein as Ridge B) is approximately one quarter mile to the east of the Pacific coastline. It runs in the north -south direction approximately 200 feet to the west of Morningside Drive in the northern portion of the City and along Monterey Boulevard in the southern parts. Approximately 241 acres of the study area lies to the west of Ridge B. This area slopes to the west with very steep grades between the ridge line and Hermosa Avenue. West of Hermosa Avenue the ground is essentially flat, with numerous sumps along Beach Drive and The Strand. A major portion of the study area lies in the valley between the two ridges and includes the westerly slopes of Ridge A and easterly slopes of Ridge B. This area is comprised of approximately 559 acres, of which approximately 32 acres drain north to the City of Manhattan Beach and are tributary to LACDPW's Bond Issue Projects 5450 and 981. The remaining 527 acres generally drain to the south towards Redondo Beach. This area has numerous sump conditions and its runoff is intercepted and conveyed westerly to the ocean by two LACDPW tunnel drains in 16th Street and Herondo Street. A • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage The study area is served by a number of existing storm drains. The location and size of these drains, along with their present tributary drainage areas have • been delineated on Figure II -1, Existing Watershed Map. The drainage areas tributary to each of the existing drains have been identified as Drainage Areas A through F. A description of each of the drainage areas follow: II -1.1 Drainage Area A Drainage Area A has approximately 319 acres tributary to LACDPW's 1960 Bond Issue Project 440 (Sixteenth Street Storm Drain). It lies between the Ridges A and B and extends north from Pier Avenue/Aviation Boulevard. Drainage Area A has a number of sumps and/or deficiencies at the following locations (deficiencies logged in LACDPW's files are indicated in italics): ▪ A sump condition along Valley Park Drive in the vicinity of 18th Street; ■ A sump condition in the vicinity of the intersection of Power Street and 20th Street; ■ A sump condition in the vicinity of the intersection of Power Street and 24th Street; • A sump condition in Valley Park, located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Valley Drive and 27th Street; • A sump condition in an area between Morningside Drive and North Ingleside Drive, extending from 27th Street to 29th Street; • Deficiency in street capacity along Valley Drive south of 18th Street (LACDPW's Drainage Deficiency No. 1.90); • A sump condition in the vicinity of Pacific Coast Highway and Tennyson Street, north of Artesia Boulevard; • A local sump (sag in the street profile) at the intersection of Campana Street and Joy Street, and deficiencies 14th Street from Prospect Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway and along Bonnie Brae Street north of 14th Street (LACDPW's Drainage Deficiency No. 1.89); II -2 nil AREAS IN MANHATTAN BEACH TRIBUTARY TO HERMOSA BEACH AREAS IN HERMOSA BEACH TRIBUTARY TO LACDPW B.I. PROJECT 981 IN MANHATTAN BEACH U Wj � co • co quO • Q -C/c) LI- Ili ARTESIA SUMP • 1 1 cri • AREAS OF HERMOSA BEACH DRAINING TO REDONDO BEACH, AND TRIB. TO HERONDO DRAIN AREA OF HERMOSA BEACH TRIBUTARY TO ARTESIA SUMP IN REDONDO BEACH J it ner- SIL 1 W W cc F N LEGEND -•-• 27 <440> CITY LIMITS DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY EXISTING STORM DRAINS WITH SIZES IN INCHES LACDWP BOND ISSUE PROJECT NUMBERS DRAINAGE AREA DESIGNATION SUMP AREA HERONDO DRAIN 1 a SIXTEENTH STREET STORM DRAIN PIERAV HERMOSA AVE. - SIXTH STREET DRAIN HERONDO DRAIN FIGURE II -I OONOIJI.97N ENGINEER AVM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 101 PACIFICA, SUITE 150 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92718 (714) 753-7333 (714) 753-7320, FAX CIT' Of ISA RACM, CALIFOINIA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE EXISTING WATERSHED MAP • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage • A local sump at the intersection of 15th Place and Mira Street; • Deficiency in street capacity along Aviation Boulevard east of Aubrey Park Court (LACDPW's Drainage Deficiency No. 1.88). • 11-1.2 Drainage Area B • • • • • • • • Drainage Area B is an approximately 208 acre area tributary to LACDPW's Bond Issue Project 623 - Unit 2, Line A and Line B, and Project 440 - Unit 2, Line D (referred to herein as Valley Drive Storm Drain). The Valley Drive Storm Drain is a lateral drain tributary to LACDPW's Bond Issue Project No. 1105 (Herondo Drain). The Herondo Drain is a regional storm drain serving an approximately 4.5 square mile watershed comprised primarily of areas in Redondo Beach, Torrance and Hermosa Beach, with some areas of Manhattan Beach and Hawthorne. The Herondo Drain was constructed in 1960, and was designed to receive 187 cfs from Project 623. Design storm flows generated in this Drainage Area are significantly higher than the capacity of the existing Valley Drive Storm Drain, and the design capacity tabled for Herondo Drain to receive flows from this area. Drainage Area B has a number of areas with sump conditions. These sumps are at the following locations: • At a number of locations along Valley Drive between Pier Avenue and Herondo Street; • At the intersection of Cypress Avenue and 6th Street; • In 2nd Street south of Valley Drive; • At the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and 3rd Street; • In Meyer Court north of 1st Street; • At the intersection of Barney Court and 1st Place; • In Massey Avenue between Prospect Avenue and 5th Street. 11-4 A lain • • • • • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage II -1.3 Drainage Area C Drainage Area C is comprised of an area of approximately 35 acres in the southwest corner of the City. This area presently drains southerly to LACDPW's Bond Issue Project 440 - Unit 2, Line E, a 27 to 36 -inch RCP storm drain in Hermosa Avenue from 2nd Street to Herondo Street. Project 440 - Unit 2, Line E was designed to convey approximately 30 cfs to the Herondo Drain. Calculated 10 -year, 25 -year and 50 -year storm flows generated in this area equal 73 cfs, 81 cfs and 92 cfs, respectively. Runoff concentrates along two sump areas in Hermosa Avenue, one just south of 2nd Street and the other at the intersection with Lyndon Street. There is another superficial sump condition, caused by the street crown, at the intersection of 1st Street and Manhattan Avenue. Due to lack of capacity in the existing storm drain to convey runoff that is presently tributary to the sump areas in Hermosa Avenue, coupled with potentially surcharged condition of the Herondo Drain, significant flooding occurs in Hermosa Avenue during storm events. II -1.4 Drainage Area D Drainage Area D is comprised of an area of approximately 37 acres draining westerly to LACDPW's Hermosa Avenue - Sixth Street Drain. This area generates approximately 72 cfs, 81 cfs and 92 cfs for 10, 25 and 50 -year storms, respectively. This area has an existing deficiency along Hermosa Avenue between 6th Street and 10th Street (LACDPW's Drainage Deficiency 1.87). However, the existing drain with a design capacity of 65 cfs will be adequate as long as overflow from neighboring drainage areas is prevented by the construction of other recommended storm drains in Hermosa Avenue. II -1.5 Drainage Area E Drainage Area E presently drains to LACDPW's Pier Avenue Drain. It is comprised an area of approximately 75 acres and includes a significant portion of the City's Downtown District. It lies to the west of Ridge B and generally drains in a southwesterly direction to a sump area in the vicinity of the intersection of the Lower Pier Avenue and Beach Drive. Other sumps/ deficiencies in this Drainage Area include: 11-5 W.' KIRA • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage • Sumps on Beach Drive at the intersections of 10th Street, 13th Street, and 14th Street. • A sump condition in Bay View north of Pier Avenue. • Deficiency in street capacity along Hermosa Avenue south of Pier Avenue. Although the Pier Avenue Drain has adequate hydraulic capacity to provide adequate protection to its tributary area, the downtown area has experienced flooding during a number of storms. The flooding problems in the sumps along Beach Drive and Pier Avenue are primarily attributed to sand deposits blocking the drain's existing outlet. LACDPW is planning to implement a remedial project that will modify the drain's outlet to relieve the problem. Another planned project that will have a significant impact on the drainage in this area is the implementation of the City's Downtown Improvement Project. This project will include modifications to the street cross-section of Lower Pier Avenue, thus changing its flow capacity. II -1.6 Drainage Area F Drainage Area F is an approximately 84 acre area west of Ridge B, and extends from 18th Street to the City's northern boundary. Surface slopes in this area are generally to the west, bringing stormwater to numerous sump areas along Beach • Drive and The Strand. This area is serviced by a number of City Drains and LACDPW's Bond Issue Project 4050 along 26th Street and Hermosa Avenue. • • • • II -2 EXISTING STORM DRAIN NETWORK Based on review of storm drain construction plans, field reconnaissance, input provided by City's storm drain maintenance staff, and examination of CCTV tapes of storm drain survey provided by the City, a comprehensive map of all the existing storm drainage facilities was developed. This Existing Storm Drain Network Map, included as Insert -I in the Appendices (bound separately), was developed on the City's digital base -map utilized for the City's Infrastructure Management Plan. The Existing Storm Drain Network Map includes size and slope of the mainline storm drains along with identification numbers assigned to all nodes such as manholes, junction structures, catch basins, connector pipes and other appurtenant structures. II -6 -A • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage II -3 EXISTING FACILITIES DATABASE • The Storm Drain Network Map along with the CCTV data was used for the development of the Storm Drain Database. Unique identification numbers were developed for each component to distinguish each pipe segment, manhole, catch basin, connector pipe, junction, etc. The identifiers, in conjunction with the • street names and associated codes, form the basis for the development of the Storm Drain Database. The Storm Drain Database is included in Appendix A. 3 • • • • • • 11-4 CCTV SURVEY DATA EVALUATION The CCTV system was utilized as a means of inspecting the physical condition of the storm drains within the City. The CCTV survey uses a portable video camera which is pulled through the pipe while video taping the interior surface of the pipe. The City has recently televised approximately 23,000 linear feet of storm drain within the City. Some pipe segments could not be surveyed due to inaccessibility for the camera equipment. The video tapes resulting from the CCTV inspection were used to extract pertinent data that was digitally logged into the database. This information included data such as pipe length, diameter, type of deficiency, and footage of each defect or observation. Pipe segments with defects or deficiencies have been highlighted with a color code on Figure II -2, CCTV Survey Summary Map. All defects/deficiencies observed were logged in a quantifiable manner on a scale of zero to ten, with zero representing a completely failed pipe segment, and ten representing a pipe segment in near -new condition. This ranking system, or Structural Condition Index (SCI), is a relative measure of the condition of the pipe. It was established by assigning points based on the severity of each defect observed. The total points of each pipe segment were then normalized by length of the segment, to allow for the relative comparison of pipes of differing lengths. The points were then converted to SCI scores representing the structural condition of each pipe segment. A summary of the CCTV survey observations and SCI scores for each pipe segment is provided in Appendix B. A detailed listing of all the observations made during the CCTV survey have been tabulated in Appendix C. II -7 / MANHATTAN E1EACH LTES I LEGEND ® COLLAPSED PIPE ® BROKEN PIPE ® CIRCULAR CRACK HOLE IN PIPE EXCESSIVE DEBRIS ® COULD NOT LOCATE/ NO ACCESS CITY LIMITS EXISTING SD. z a 1- r w r ...I ItaI1 _J °WWI `MEI F 11111 I h S Mtn :i1 . .. im Iliv 1FfJJi 1 E DF -7 ILL L HERONDO DRAIN CON• SULTING ENGINEERS REDONDD BEACH FIGURE II -2 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE CCTV SURVEY SUMMARY MAP • • 0 • • v • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage The points assigned for each type of defect are listed in Appendix A. Only structural defects have weighted severity applied to it. Observations pertaining to routine maintenance were not considered in the development of the SCI, as structural integrity of the pipe would not be typically jeopardized by these types of observations. The weighted points assigned to each defect described in Appendix A were applied to an equation to arrive at an SCI score for each pipe segment listed in Appendix B. The SCI equation is as follows: SCIraw = Sum(Defects * defect score) * 100 length The resulting values are applied to Table II -4A to arrive at an SCI value. Table II -4A Condition Index Score Values Condition Index Range 10 0 - 10 9 10- 18 8 18-27 7 27-36 6 36-46 5 46-55 4 55-64 3 64 - 73 2 73-82 1 82 - 91 0 91 -3000 II -9 KM • • 0 • • s s City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage The analysis of the CCTV inspections has demonstrated that the storm drain network is generally in very good condition. There were only four (4) severe structural defects identified, i.e. a collapsed segment in the 63" RCP in Valley Drive, a broken pipe segment in the 24" RCP in Gould Avenue, and two (2) broken pipe segments in 18" connector pipes in 5th Street. The majority of physical deficiencies in the televised pipes appear to be minor cracks and instances of infiltration. A summarized account of the defects encountered is listed in Table II -4B. Table II -4B Results of Physical Inspection Description Number of Occurrences Break-in Connection 2 Broken Pipe 3 Camera Blocked 11 Camera Submerged 2 Circular Crack 7 Collapsed Pipe 1 Corrosion Light 1 Downstream Manhole 116 End Observation 1 Hole in Pipe 1 Infiltration 4 Joint with Infiltration 6 Lateral Infiltration 4 Pipe Size Change 4 Pipe Turns -Bend 52 Reverse Set Up 2 Service Connection 139 Upstream Manhole 117 11-10 • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage After running the SCI Equation on the data compiled above, the SCI distribution is described in Table II -4C. Table II -4C Distribution of SCI II -5 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The City of Hermosa Beach has implemented a Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program as outlined in the Implementation Manual, prepared by • Woodward -Clyde. To support the City's compliance with the requirements set forth by the NPDES Permit, this master plan study accomplishes the following: • Provides a detailed Existing Storm Drain Network Map and Database, • which is included in the Appendices. • • • ■ A CCTV Survey inspection of the system which did not identify any apparent illegal or illicit connections. • In order to assist the City's maintenance efforts in performing the Best Management Practices included in the Implementation Manual, the following Figure II -3, Storm Drain Service Area Map, identifies the existing storm drain systems servicing the City's commercial and industrial land uses. Structural Condition Index Number of Occurrences 10 112 9 4 8 1 7 1 6 0 5 or Less 4 II -5 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The City of Hermosa Beach has implemented a Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program as outlined in the Implementation Manual, prepared by • Woodward -Clyde. To support the City's compliance with the requirements set forth by the NPDES Permit, this master plan study accomplishes the following: • Provides a detailed Existing Storm Drain Network Map and Database, • which is included in the Appendices. • • • ■ A CCTV Survey inspection of the system which did not identify any apparent illegal or illicit connections. • In order to assist the City's maintenance efforts in performing the Best Management Practices included in the Implementation Manual, the following Figure II -3, Storm Drain Service Area Map, identifies the existing storm drain systems servicing the City's commercial and industrial land uses. LEGEND I HD I HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 33 du/ao '; MD i MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 25 du/ao LD LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13 du/ao SPECIFIC PLAN AREA GENERAL COMMERCIAL NC NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL RECREATION MHP MOBILE HOME PARK INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE HD FIGURE I2-3 OCN■U1: pN(i1Nrl AKM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 101 PACIFICA SUITE 150 IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92718 (714) 753-7333 (714) 753-7320, FAX CITY C. I 5A wa4 CALIfO.liA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE STORM DRAIN SERVICE AREA MAP • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage SECTION III • MASTER PLANNED FACILITIES • • • • • • • III -1 MASTER PLAN HYDROLOGY In conformance with the procedures set forth in LACDPW's Hydrology Manual, and based on the criteria outlined in Section I-4, hydrologic models of each of the Drainage Areas were developed. Model runs for 10 -year, 25 -year, and 50 -year frequency storms were performed, and compared against the capacities of the existing storm drains. Since numerous sump conditions exist throughout the study area, majority of the storm drain systems were evaluated for 50 -year frequency storm (Capital Flood). Once the system deficiencies were identified, alternate solutions to relieve existing deficiencies were formulated and evaluated. Results of the final run of the hydrologic models, incorporating flow routing through existing and recommended master planned facilities, are shown in the Hydrology Map, an insert included in the back of this report as Plate 1. The Hydrology Map includes delineation of sub -areas, along with their identification numbers, acreage, concentration nodes, and tabulated peak flows for 10 -year, 25 -year and 50 -year frequency storms. III -2 MASTER PLANNED FACILITIES Once the design flow rates were determined for each subarea and the deficiencies were identified, feasible alternate solutions to relieve deficiencies in the existing storm drainage system were developed. Preliminary facility sizes and cost estimates for the alternatives were generated, and a quantitative and qualitative comparison of the alternatives were conducted to select and recommend the most viable alternative for implementation as a master plan facility. System extensions to relieve flooding in areas where runoff exceeded the street conveyance capacities were identified. Preliminary sizes and limits of recommended improvements in the City, along with locations and sizes of the existing facilities are shown on the Master Planned Facilities Map, an insert included in the back of this report as Plate 2. • A summary of each of the master planned storm drain systems in the City, along with their estimated capital cost are presented in the following sections: • / • • • • • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage III2.1 Sixteenth Street Storm Drain The Sixteenth Street Storm Drain is a County Drain comprised of LACDPW's Bond Issue Project 440 -Unit 1, Lines A, B and C; Bond Issue Project 4001 - Unit 1, Lines C, D and E; and the 21st Street Drain. An area of approximately 319 acres, described in Section II -1 as Drainage Area A, is tributary to this storm drain system. This system consists of two branches identified as Line B and Line C. Line B mainly serves the areas east of Pacific Coast Highway and north of Pier Avenue/Aviation Boulevard, and Line C serves a number of sumps in the vicinity of Valley Park and along Power Street in the northern portion of the City. Line C starts at the City's boundary with Manhattan Beach, from a sump located at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Tennyson Street, and continues westerly before reaching the Valley Park. It picks up flows from the number of sumps as it continues south in Power Street and Valley Park to the confluence with Line B in the northwest corner of Hermosa Valley School property. Line B starts at the intersection of 21st Street and Prospect, and continues westerly to PCH, thence, south in Pacific Coast Highway to Pier Avenue; thence, west in Pier Avenue to Valley Drive; thence, north in Valley Drive to 17th Street; then turns west through the Hermosa Valley School property to its confluence with Line C. It generally intercepts flows from the area between Prospect Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway, and from the areas tributary to the sump area in the Upper Pier Avenue between Monterey Boulevard and Ardmore Drive. Lines B and C are both inadequate to handle the design storm flows tributary to these systems. Downstream from their confluence, they drain to Line A, a 66 to 72 -inch tunnel under 16th Street, outleting to Pacific Ocean in a 9'(w) x 3'-3"(h) RC Box. This storm drain system also picks up flows from an approximately ten acre area between 18th Street and 15th Street in the vicinity of Beach Drive. This storm drain was built in 1965 with a design capacity of approximately 320 cfs between Hermosa Valley School and the outlet. However, hydrology calculations indicate that the area tributary to Sixteenth Street Storm Drain generates a peak 50 - year flow of 840 cfs at the outlet. III -2 = /Kai • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage Six alternate solutions to relieve this system were evaluated and presented to the City in a letter report dated June 1, 1995. A copy of this letter report is • included in Section IV, Evaluation of Alternatives. Based on discussions with City staff, Alternative 4 was selected as the preferred alternative. Although Alternative 3 was a little cheaper but required a more depth in the proposed detention basin at the School site. • • • • • • • • • Alternative 4 includes two proposed detention basins, in order to best utilize the existing storm drain system and avoid having to tunnel a storm drain parallel to the one in 16th Street. The first proposed detention basin is to be located along Line C in Valley Park which is also a natural sump. At this location, the peak basin inflow of 233 cfs can be reduced to 10 cfs. By reducing the outflow in Line C, the existing downstream pipe can be utilized without the need for costly replacement or parallel piping. The proposed basin will have a detention volume of 27 acre- feet. The second basin is a flow -by basin along Line B and will need to be in the field area of Hermosa Valley School. This basin would not receive flows from Line C in order to limit the depth of the basin to less than six feet. Other improvements recommended for this system includes the following: • To relieve the existing drain in Pacific Coast Highway, divert flows in the 21st Street Drain with a new relief drain in 21st Street from Pacific Coast Highway to Ardmore Drive, and south in Ardmore Drive to the vicinity of Line B. • To relieve the existing 48 -inch drain in Valley Drive downstream from the sump at the Upper Pier Avenue, divert all the flows at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and 16th Street with a new relief drain along 16th Street to Ardmore Drive; thence north in Ardmore Drive to its confluence with the new relief drain from north (described above); thence west in 17th Street to the proposed detention basin in the school property. • Extend the existing system to alleviate drainage deficiencies at the following locations: III -3 A • • • • • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage • along 18th Street from PCH to Prospect Avenue; • along 16th Street from PCH to Prospect Avenue; • along 14th Street from Bonnie Brae to Prospect Avenue; • along Aviation Boulevard from Aubrey Park Court to east of Owosso Street. III2.2 Valley Drive Storm Drain This storm drain system is the second major system in the boundaries of Hermosa Beach. This system was built in 1967 under LACFCD's Bond Issue Project 623 -Unit 2, Lines A and B, and Project 440 -Unit 2, Line D. This storm drain is tributary to LACFCD's Bond Issue Project 1105 (Herondo Drain) in Herondo Street. The tributary area to this system is approximately 208 acres. The southeastern portion of the City of Hermosa Beach between Prospect Avenue (Ridge A) and Monterey Boulevard (Ridge B) , and south of Pier Avenue/Aviation Boulevard, generally make up the tributary area. Peak runoff rates generated in this drainage area were calculated at 375 cfs, 426 cfs and 491 cfs for 10 -year, 25 -year and 50 -year frequency storms, respectively. However, the design capacity of the existing storm drain system, including the tabled design capacity of Herondo Drain to accept flows from the Valley Drive Storm Drain, is limited to 187 cfs (less than 50 percent of the tributary 10 -year flows). Due to insufficient capacity in this storm drain system, coupled with potentially surcharged conditions that presently exist in the Herondo Drain, the Valley Drive Storm Drain system is severely deficient to provide adequate protection during any major storm event. Furthermore, based on the CCTV Survey, severe structural defects including collapsed pipe segments were identified in the drain along Valley Drive between 2nd Street and Herondo Drive. Five alternatives to alleviate the existing deficiency in the Valley Drive Storm Drain have been evaluated and presented to the City in a letter report dated January 29, 1996. A copy of the letter report is included in Section IV, Evaluation of Alternatives. The alternate solution recommended, Alternative 4, is comprised of the construction a new storm drain in Valley Drive from 11th Street to 2nd Street, and diverting all the flow in Valley Drive west in a new relief drain along 2nd Street from Valley Drive to the Ocean. The proposed storm drain in 2nd Street will also eliminate another existing deficiency in Hermosa Avenue in the vicinity of 2nd Street, and provide significant relief to the Herondo Drain as well. III -4 . . . . . . . ____ _ __..i lei • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage Other improvements recommended for this system include the following: • To relieve the existing deficiencies in the storm drain in 3rd Street, divert all the flow in Pacific Coast Highway in a new relief drain along 3rd Street from Pacific Coast Highway to Valley Drive. • A 24" storm drain is proposed between Prospect Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway in 2nd Street to provide outlets to three sumps located at the intersection of Barney Court and 1st Place, in Meyer Court north of 1st Street, and in Massey Avenue south of 5th Street. • A 24" storm drain is proposed in 5th Street between Prospect Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway to alleviate local deficiency caused by insufficient street capacity. III2.3 Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain, built in 1967, is LACDPW's Bond Issue Project 440 - Unit 2, Line E. The existing drain presently receives runoff from Drainage Area C, an approximately 35 acre area in the most southwesterly portion of the City. It is tributary to Project No. 1105, Herondo Drain.. It is tabled to contribute 30 cfs • to the existing Herondo Drain, which matches the existing pipe capacity. The hydrology for the areas tributary to this storm drain yielded 105 cfs for the 50 -year frequency storm. However, this deficiency will be eliminated when the proposed relief drain for Valley Drive Storm Drain is constructed in 2nd Street. • 111-2.4 Hermosa Avenue - Sixth Street Drain • • • LACDPW's Hermosa Avenue - Sixth Street Drain was built in 1991 to serve approximately 37 acres (Drainage Area D). The existing storm drain pipe are 24" and 36" RCP. The storm drain originates at a local sump at the intersection of 8th Street and Monterey Boulevard and runs west in 8th Street to Hermosa Avenue; thence south in Hermosa Avenue to 6th Street; thence west to the ocean outlet. There are also two 24" lateral drains designed to intercept flows on Beach Drive between 6th Court and 9th Court. Improvements proposed for this system include lateral drains in Palm Drive and Bay View to provide outlets for the sumps in these streets. III -5 A ion • • • • • • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage 111-2.5 Pier Avenue Drain The Pier Avenue Drain was built in 1991 by LACDPW to alleviate flooding along Hermosa Avenue between Pier Avenue and 16th Street, and at the sump conditions in the vicinity of the Lower Pier and Beach Drive. This is a 42 to 54 -inch RCP drain with a 4' x 4' RCB ocean outlet just south of the City's pier. Drainage Area E, comprising of approximately 75 acres and generating a 50 -year peak flow rate of 146 cfs, is presently tributary to the Pier Avenue Drain. Although the existing drain has a design capacity of 120 cfs, significant levels of flooding occur in this downtown area during storm events. The flooding problems are attributed to the blockage of the drain's ocean outlet structure, caused by sand deposited by ocean waves in front of the mouth of the outlet. Another problem resulting from this blockage is that during dry seasons nuisance runoff and debris get trapped in the drain for extended periods causing odor problems. In order to mitigate these problems, LACDPW is planning to proceed with the implementation of an Ocean Outlet Modification project for the Pier Avenue Drain. This project will comprise of the following: ■ Extending the 4' x 4' RCB outlet approximately 40 feet westerly to daylight the soffit of the outlet conduit beyond the typical summer profile of the coastal sand, and constructing a Wave Protection Wall, to prevent the sand build-up from completely sealing the outlet opening. Even a partial opening at the outlet will usually initiate flow conditions that will wash the sand away and open the outlet to flow freely. ■ Construction of a seepage well, a trash barrier, and a desilting basin in- line with the mainline drain, located in the beach sand just west of The Strand. This combination of facilities will prevent trash and debris from outletting to the ocean and eliminate nuisance water remaining in the conduit during low flow conditions. • Installing a pressure manhole and two flapgates at the junction of the two existing lateral storm drains servicing sump areas to the north and south of Pier Avenue. This will prevent Pier Avenue Drain from overflowing to these sump areas when its mainline capacity is restricted due to full or partial blockage of the ocean outlet. Also, by sealing the mainline drain at this junction, the hydraulic pressure in the conduit can be increased to further help clear the blockage at the ocean outlet. III -6 -AIMKai • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage In addition to LACDPW's planned modification project for the Pier Avenue • Drain, following are additional improvements recommended for this system: • A 24 -inch RCP lateral drain in the Upper Pier Avenue, from Bay View to Hermosa Avenue. • • • • • • • • • • A 36 -inch RCP lateral drain in Hermosa Avenue from 10th Street to Pier Avenue. ■ Two 24 -inch RCP storm drains with their own shallow outlets are proposed for the sumps in Beach Drive at 10th Street and 13th Street. These outlets will provide supplemental relief for these sumps. They will drain the sumps in Beach Drive when their tributary lateral storm drain flapgates are closed, and will also provide a backup outlet for the Lower Pier Avenue area. • The calculated 50 -year flows tributary to the Pier Avenue Drain will be reduced to less than its design flow of 120 cfs by diverting areas north of 18th Street and east of Hermosa Avenue to other proposed storm drains. Approximately 8 acres are diverted the 18th Street Storm Drain, and 10 acres to the 22nd Street Storm Drain. 111-2.6 18th Street Storm Drain The existing 18th Street storm drain is a local facility that was built by the City of Hermosa Beach. It is an 18 -inch diameter storm drain in 18th Street between Hermosa Avenue and the ocean outlet. Construction plans for this storm drain were not available, and neither was the CCTV survey successful in locating this pipe. The outlet of the pipe is buried in sand. It is recommended that this system be replaced with a 24 -inch RCP storm drain in 18th Street, and that another 24 -inch storm drain be constructed in Beach Drive to serve the three local sumps in this street. Approximately, 8 acres of Drainage Area E and 10 acres of Drainage Area F will be tributary to this facility. III -7 . .. ., ____ _ _ _ ...... A i ofi • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage III -2.7 22nd Street Storm Drain The 22nd Street Storm Drain will relieve flooding along Hermosa Avenue between 24th Street and 21st Street. It is also proposed to intercept approximately 10 acres, that presently drain to the Pier Avenue Drain, at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and 21st Street . The total tributary area to this proposed facility is approximately 31 acres. The proposed 22nd Street Storm Drain is proposed to comprise of two separate storm drain systems. One is a 24 -inch and 30 -inch diameter drain in 22nd Street, Hermosa Avenue and 24th Street, and second is a 24 -inch drain in Beach Drive that provides relief for the two sumps along Beach Drive between 24th Street and 22nd Street. Each storm drains is proposed to outlet to the ocean, thus providing a separation between high pressure and low pressure system. • III -2.8 26th Street Storm Drain • This existing storm drain was built in 1980 as LACDPW's Bond Issue Project 4050 - Unit 2, Line C and D. It is a 24 -inch to 27 -inch RCP storm drain along Hermosa Avenue between 28th Street and 25th Street, and an ocean outlet in 26th Street. This system has a tributary area of approximately 26 acres generating a peak flow rate of 57 cfs for a 10 -year storm. • III2.9 35th Street Storm Drain • • • • The 35th Street Storm Drain is located at the northwest corner of the City. There is an existing 18 -inch storm drain at this location that was built by the City to service the area in the vicinity of 35th Street and Hermosa Avenue. The CCTV survey was unable to determine the size and condition of the pipe, but confirmed the existence of the outlet structure on the beach. This system has an approximate drainage area of 23 acres. The proposed 35th Street Storm Drain has two separate storm drain system, comprising of a 24 -inch storm drain along Hermosa Avenue, 35th Street and Manhattan Avenue, and a 24 -inch storm drain in Beach Drive. The storm drain in Beach Drive is to alleviate the flooding problems at a number of sumps conditions in this street, and is proposed to have separate outlet to ocean to provide the difference between high pressure and low pressure systems. III -8 =1 min • • • • • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage III -3 COST ESTIMATES Summarized in Table III -1 are construction and capital costs for all the projects recommended in this master plan study, and shown in Plate II, Master Plan Facilities Map. It should be noted that costs associated with acquisition of right of way or drainage easements required for the construction of the proposed detention basins have not been included, herein. Construction Costs are based on Construction Costs Index for the fourth quarter of 1995, and include 15 percent for contingencies. Capital Costs are determined by multiplying the Total Construction Costs by a factor of 1.15 for administration, engineering, and inspection. III -9 K M • • • • • • • • • • • TABLE III -1 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH SIXTEENTH STREET STORM DRAIN DATE: 14 -Feb -96 VALLEY DRIVE STORM DRAIN 31TANI1OLES PVMT. COST SHORING COST INLETS SUBTOTAL CONTL (15 ') TOTAL CONST. COST ENGR/ ADMIN (15%). CAPITAL COSTS SIZE (InsA) LENGTH (L«O. UNIT COST PIPING COST No. COST NO. COST UNIT COST TOTAL, 2200 5114.00 5250,800 6 511,916 552,800 515,400 4 $30,000 $360,916 $54,137 5415,053 562,258 . _ . COST 24 1500 $91.20 S136,800 6 S11,916 S31,500 $10,500 1 $7,500 S198,216 S29,732 $227,948 $34,192 $175 10'x5' 24 3800 $91.20 S346,560 13 $25,818 $79,800 S26,600 4 S30,000 $508,778 $76,317 S585,095 $87,764 $177 S262,140 $672,859 36 1800 S114.00 $205,200 5 $9,930 $43,200 S12,600 6 $45,000 $315,930 $47,390 $363,320 $54,498 S232 $417,818 42 1500 $128.10 $192,150 4 S8,568 S38,250 $16,500 14 $112,000 $367,468 $55,120 S422,588 $63,388 $324 48 400 $141.90 S56,760 1 $2,286 $10,800 S4,400 6 $48,000 $122,246 S18,337 $140,583 $21,087 $404 S485,976 S161,670 48 950 $141.90 $134,805 2 $4,572 S25,650 S10,450 2 $16,000 $191,477 S28,722 $220,199 S33 030 $267 $253,229 54 350 $151.20 S52,920 1 $2,430 S9,975 S3,850 2 $16,000 $85,175 $12,776 $97,951 $14,693 $322 S112,644 Detention Basin @ School Site Excavation / Hauling S119,000 5119,000 On-site Improvements 5100,000 5100,000 Detention Basin @ Park Site Excavation / Hauling 5315,000 On-site Improvements $100,000 S315,000 5100,000 SUBTOTAL .........::::....: . S3.000336'' VALLEY DRIVE STORM DRAIN HERMOSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN 24 3900 591.20 5355,680 14 527,804 581,900 527,300 9 567,500 5560,184 584,028 5644,212 $96,632 5190 $2911 36 2200 5114.00 5250,800 6 511,916 552,800 515,400 4 $30,000 $360,916 $54,137 5415,053 562,258 5217 S740,844 84 2700 $277.20 $748,440 6 $21,708 597,200 548,600 10 $85,000 51,000,948 5I50,142 $1,151,090 $172,664 $490 $477,311 51,323,754 10'x5' 400 $400.00 $160,000 0 SO SO SO 0 SO S160,000 $24,000 $184,000 $27,600 $529 SUBTOTAL 5211,600 $2,753.509 HERMOSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN '(fTaTOTAL $332,272'' 18 450 $84.60 538,070 2 $3,972 $8,775 53,150 6 $45,000 $98,967 $14,845 $113,812 $17,072 $2911 24 850 $91.20 $77,520 3 55,958 S17,850 $5,950 6_ S45,000 $152,278 $22,842 5175,120 $26,268 $130,884 $2371 $201,388 '(fTaTOTAL $332,272'' TABLE III -1 (CONT'D) HERMOSA AVENUE - SIXTH STREET DRAIN SIZE LENGTH > UNIT. PIPING. (Inch) (feet.) COST .COST. MANHOLES No.; COST PVMT. COST SHORING: COST INLETS NO. COST SUBTOTAL CONTI (15'%) TOTAL CONST. COST EMU ADMJN (15 %) CAf rAL.COSTS UNIT COST TOTAL COST .. 24 1SUBTOTAL 600 $91.20 $54,720 3 $5,958 S12,600 $4,200 6 $45,000 $122,478 $18,372 $140,850 PIER AVENUE DRAIN $21,128 S270 S161,978 5161,978' 24 36 1800 $91.20 S164,160 7 $13,902 $37,800 $12,600 6 S45,000 $273,462 $41,019 SUBTOTAL 600 5114.00 568,400 2 $3,972 S14,400 S4,200 2 $15,000 $ 105,972 $15,896 $314,481 5121,868 18TH STREET STORM DRAIN $47,172 518,280 S201 S234 5361,653 5140,148 $501,801 24 1500 591.20 $136,800 SUBTOTAL S11,916 $31,500 510,500 $30,000 S220,716 $33,107 $253,823 22ND STREET STORM DRAIN $38,073 $195 S29 ,896 ............... S291,896'' 24 30 1150 $91.20 $104,880 4 $7,944 $24,150 $8,050 10 $75,000 $220,024 $33,004 SUBTOTAL 400 $ 102.30 $40,920 2 $3,972 $9,000 $2,800 10 S75,000 $131,692 $19,754 35TH STREET STORM DRAIN $253,028 $ 151,446 $37,954 $22,717 $253 $435 $290,982 5174,163 S465,145< 24 SUBTOTAL. 3000 591.20 $273,600 11 $24,354 $63,000 $21,000 8 560,000 $441,954 $66,293 $508,247 576,237 $195 5584,484 ¶584,484 NOTAL. 29;850 98 116 $7,118,714 $972,707 $8;091,421 • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage SECTION IV EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES Preliminary evaluation of alternate solutions to alleviate flooding in areas tributary to • the Sixteenth Street Storm Drain and the Valley Drive Storm Drain were conducted during the course of this study. Copies of the letter reports summarizing these evaluations are presented in this section. • • • • • • • • IV -1 SIXTEENTH STREET STORM DRAIN EVALUATION Preliminary evaluation of six alternate solutions to relieve deficiencies in the existing Sixteenth Street Storm Drain (LACDPW's Bond Issue Project 440 - Unit 1, Lines A, B, and C) was conducted and submitted to the city in a letter report dated, June 1, 1995. A copy of this letter report is included in the following pages as, Exhibit IV -A. N-1 _ ___ _ _------ --- -==.! K M • -A CONSULTING ENGINEERS June 1, 1995 City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Attention: Mr. Joe Mankavich Exhibit IV -A AKM Consulting Engineers 101 Pacifica, Suite 150 Irvine, California 92718 (714)753-7333, Fax: (714)753-7320 Subject: Preliminary Evaluation of Alternative Solutions for Flooding in the Sixteenth Street Storm Drain Watershed: Dear Joe: Pursuant to our recent discussions, this letter is to present a number of available alternative solutions • for relieving flooding in the Sixteenth Street Storm Drain watershed. Upon your review of the alternatives, we would like to discuss with you the feasibility of implementing the facilities required Under each alternative scenario. • • The Sixteenth Street Storm Drain (LACDPW's Bond Issue Project No.440) presently serves a 336 - acre watershed in the northeast quadrant of the City. It comprises of two major drainage systems, Line B and Line C, that convey flows from the east and north respectively, and confluence with Line A at the intersection of Valley Park Avenue and Seventeenth Street. Downstream from the confluence, Line A drains west along Sixteenth Street to the Pacific Ocean. In addition to the drainage areas tributary to Lines B and C, an 18 -acre subarea along the Strand is also tributary to this system. The watershed has a number of deficiencies and/or sump areas at the following locations: • Valley Park Avenue, between Seventeenth Street and Eighteenth Street; • • Valley Drive and Pier Avenue; • Power Street and Twentieth Street; • • Power Street and Twenty Fourth Street; • Valley Park; • Twenty Eighth Street, between Morningside Drive and North Ingleside Drive; • • Pacific Coast Highway, between Gould Avenue and Thirtieth Street. • City of Hermosa Beach Mr. Joe Mankavich June 1, 1995 Page Two Due to the sump conditions in this watershed, 50 -year storm hydrology was used to establish preliminary facility sizes. Peak 50 -year storm runoff at primary concentration nodes and capacities of the existing mainline storm drain conduits has been summarized in the attached Figure 1. The • existing storm drain system is severely deficient to adequately service this area during a major storm event. We have evaluated six alternative solutions that will alleviate the potential for flooding at the sump locations. Preliminary layouts, sizes and tributary flows for the facilities required under each • alternative are shown in Figures 2 thru 7. Project cost estimates are for each of the alternatives are included in the attached Tables. Please note that the cost estimates do not include any maintenance costs, or costs for the acquisition of right of way and/or easements. Following is a brief description of each of the alternatives evaluated: • • • • • • • Alternative 1 can be considered as the baseline solution. It provides for full conveyance of flows, i.e. with no detention facilities. It relieves the existing Line A by providing a new 90 - inch storm drain along Nineteenth Street. It also includes parallel relief drains along Line B extending to the Pier Avenue/Valley Drive intersection, and along Line C extending to the PCH/Tennyson Street intersection. This alternative would require drainage easements between 17th Street and 20th Street east of Loma Drive, and also involve approximately 700 linear feet of tunneling. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $ 3.2 million. Alternative 2 utilizes an detention basin with capacity of approximately 9 acre-feet at the north east corner of Valley Park Avenue / 17th Street (in Hermosa Valley High School Site) to eliminate the need to relieve Line A. However, parallel drains to relieve Lines B and C will be required as in Alternative 1. The detention basin would receive overflows from Lines B and C when flows in these drains exceed 160 cfs. Since the basin has to receive flows from Line C which drains the sump in Valley Park Avenue, the invert of this detention basin would have to be lowered by approximately 12 to 14 feet below its existing grades. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $ 2 million. C: M PQOMP FILES U.TRSV {ER Ml O M. M R City of Hermosa Beach Mr. Joe Mankavich June 1, 1995 Page Three Alternative 3 is similar to Alternative 2, except it utilizes an additional detention basin at the Valley Park site to eliminate the need of a parallel relief for Line C, downstream from the basin. The 3 acre-feet basin capacity at the park site is enough to reduce the flows in Line C to its existing capacity. However, a 7 acre-feet basin will be required at the school site to reduce flows in Line A to its existing capacity. As in Alternative 2, the basin at the school site will have to receive flows from Lines B and C and, therefore, would require the basin bottom to be approximately 12 to 14 feet below existing grade. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $ 1.4 million. Alternative 4 is similar to Alternative 3 except it provides for higher reduction of flows in Line C by increasing the size of the detention basin at park site. This alternative also eliminates the connection of Line C to the basin at the school site, thereby, reducing the depth requirement of this basin to approximately 6 feet. Although this scenario of flow routing increases the detention volume requirement at both the basins as compared to that of Alternative 3, this may be a preferred alternative due to lesser depth requirements at the school site. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $ 1.6 million. Alternative 5 essentially separates the flows in Lines B and C by diverting Line C flows in a new 60 -inch relief drain along 19th Street. Since Line B is the only remaining tributary to Line A, an underground reinforced concrete chamber with a detention capacity of 2 acre-feet can be utilized to reduce peak flows to existing capacities. This detention chamber can be constructed within the street right of way, thereby, eliminating the need of drainage easement in the school site. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $ 2.5 million. Alternative 6 is similar to Alternative 1, except it eliminates the need to construct a parallel • relief drain along Line C by providing a detention basin at the park site. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $ 2.7 million. Based on preliminary evaluation of project costs, Alternative 3, which utilizes detention facilities • at both, the park and the school, sites in order to eliminate additional conveyance requirements for Lines A and C, was found to be the most cost effective solution. C:WWP6O WPFILES‘L,TRWiFRMIOM.MR • • • • • • • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Mr. Joe Mankavich June 1, 1995 Page Four r This evaluation does no account for the cost of acquisition of easements or right of way to construct these facilities. We have, however, included costs to rehabilitate the detention basins to maintain the present usage of these properties. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 714-753-7333. Very truly yours, AKM Consulting Engineers ,01/ Mohammed Rowther Project Manager C:\WP6O WPFILF_SV.TRS1HERM10�`'.MR • • • • • • __ • • 050= CAP 218 392 cfs cfs OLAP- 218 cf VALLEY PARK LINE C • 50 - 241 cfs • 342 cfs LINE B 050- 445 cfs 0CAP- 258 cfs 050' 826 cfs CAP' 320 cfs 1 1 LINE A��I 1 N =N PACIFIC OCEAN 1481 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN AND SIZE EXISTING STORM DRAIN AND SIZE h:\hermosa\hermproa.dgn May. 31, 1995 14:43:43 5 5 1; O 5 MOWERY BAY Vint MANATTAN IN i 5 5 I;�I ILS UI I. 1 w_ Km PROJECT No.. l41 -94-0I CITY OF HERpSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE 50 YEAR HYDROLOGY PROJECT 440 DATES MAY igg5 FIGURE I LINE C VALLEY PARK 826 cfs 320 cfs 342 cfs o • 342 cfs 506 cfs PACIFIC OCEAN 1481 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN AND SIZE -._ EXISTING STORM DRAIN AND SIZE CITY OF HERMDSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE h:\hermosa\hermpro0.dgn Jun. 1, 1995 08:44:29 DATE, MAY 1915 • 1 1 • • • • • old 285 cfs 01; 232 cfs 050' 392 cfs 050' 445 cfs 48 LINE 8 160 cfs r 1 VALLEY PARK 160 cfs 342 cfs---� PACIFIC OCEAN 1481 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN AND SIZE EXISTING STORM DRAIN AND SIZE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE h:\hermosa\hermprol.dgn Jun. 1, 1995 08:43:46 PROJECT Noa 141-94-81 DATE, MAY 1995 OIT 108 cfs 050. 268 cfs Our 285 cfs Oso - 445 cfs 48 LINE B r___160 cfs 1 0 - 241 cfs(In) VALLEY PARK 3 AF' DETENTION BASIN POWER 0129 cfs 08 cfs 50 ST. ( O50 212 cfs 160 cfs A PACIFIC OCEAN 1481 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN AND SIZE EXISTING STORM DRAIN AND SIZE h:\hermosa\hermpro2.dgn Jun. 1, 1995 08:43:01 `\320 cfs IOWA LINE A gI = .1 PROJECT 11... 141-94-/1 DATE, HAY 1996 1 sow v1Ev HANATTAN 1I b 14 141 is 1 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE ALTERNATIVE 3 PROJECT 440 FIGURE 4 • • 050 241 cfs 27 AF DETENTION BASIN X50 "in sir* J • • • • • • Inn POWER 050 122 cfs 8 cfs sT. MONTEREY 050' 216 cfs VALLEY PARK 050 161 cfs BLVD. 00 341 cfs e IO AF DETENTION BASIN I 050 320 cfs ►41TERy SB: 050` 445 cfs LINE B . 104 cfs 54 LINE A uoile IIN,RgTMA AA 001111111111111 1 1 48 MY VIEW 111111111111MANATTAN 111111111111 I�f a N rtt ;:74 g as 0A. PACIFIC OCEAN 1481 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN AND SIZE EXISTING STORM DRAIN AND SIZE. h:\hermosa\hermpro3.dgn Jun. 1, 1995 08:57:29 c 1,11 leI 13 >$I KM PROJECT No.. 141-94-01 GATE, MAY 1995 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE ALTERNATIVE q PROJECT 440 FIGURES • 050 241 cfs 3 AF DETENTION BASIN IDE Y 050 6 iA a�M A 1481 -I$ �-- — • • • POWER 0 129 cfs 08 ofs 50 4 vainE AVE. ST. Oln= 125 cfs 050` 55 cfs r VALLEY PARK 212 cfs So 212 cfs r MONTEREY BLVD. 2 AF DETENTION RC CHAMBER a I; I I LINE B 050 - 445 cfs 54 48 4 Oso ' 320 cfs 111111 LINE A offs111111111111111111t I I r I I 0111111111111111111 PACIFIC OCEAN PROPOSED STORM DRAIN AND SIZE EXISTING STORM DRAIN AND SIZE h:\hermosa\hermpro4.dgn Jun. 1, 1995 09:02:46 I MI KM PROJECT Nw 141-14-11 DATE. MAY 1115 CITY Of HERMOSA REACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE ALTERNATIVE 5 PROJECT 440 FIGURE R • • 11,____ _ • • • • • • • 3 AF DETENTION BASIN PACIFIC OCEAN 1481 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN AND SIZE - -.a$._. -. EXISTING STORM DRAIN AND SIZE h:\hermosa\hermpro5.dgn Jun. 1, 1995 09:06:32 R, CITY OF NKOD BEACH Kra MASTER PLAN OFF DRAINAGE ALTERNATIVE 0 PROJECT 440 PROJECT No.. 141 -94 -II DATE, MAY 1995 FIGURE 7 • • • • • • • • • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED RELIEF FOR LACDPW's BOND ISSUE PROJECT NO. 440 ALTERNATIVE 1 MAY 30 , 1995 DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL 33 " RELIEF DRAIN (PCH, to Valley Park) 48 " RELIEF DRAIN (Valley Park to 25th Street) 51" RELIEF DRAIN (25th Street to 24th Place) 54" RELIEF DRAIN (24th Place to Sump) 54" RELIEF DRAIN (Pier avenue to 17th Street) 90 " RELIEF DRAIN (Tunnel Installation) 90 " RELIEF DRAIN (Trench Installation) LF LF LF LF LF LF LF $150.00 $170.00 $180.00 $200.00 $200.00 $1,400.00 $300.00 1,750 450 400 1,700 1,350 700 1,400 $262,500.00 $76,500.00 $72,000.00 $340,000.00 $270,000.00 $980,000.00 $420,000.00 CONTINGENCY (15%) ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION (15%) $363,150.00 $417,622.50 Costs for acquisition of right-of-way or easements have not been included. • • • • • • • • • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED RELIEF FOR LACDPW's BOND ISSUE PROJECT NO. 440 ALTERNATIVE 2 MAY 30 , 1995 DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL DETENTION BASIN @ SCHOOL SITE Excavation / Hauling On- site Improvements 33 " RELIEF DRAIN (PCH to Valley Park) 48 " RELIEF DRAIN (Valley Park to 25th Street) 51" RELIEF DRAIN (25th Street to 24th Place) 54" RELIEF DRAIN (24th Place to Sump) 54" RELIEF DRAIN (Pier avenue to 17th Street) CONTINGENCY (15%) CY LS LF LF LF LF LF $7.00 $250,000.00 $150.00 $170.00 $180.00 $200.00 $200.00 30,000 1 1,750 450 400 1,700 1,350 $210,000.00 $250,000.00 $262,500.00 $76,500.00 $72,000.00 $340,000.00 $270,000.00 ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION (15%) TOTAL. Costs for acquisition of right-of-way or easements have not been included. $222,150.00 $255,472.50 • • • • • • • • • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED RELIEF FOR LACDPW's BOND ISSUE PROJECT NO. 440 ALTERNATIVE 3 MAY 30 , 1995 DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL DETENTION BASIN @ SCHOOL SITE Excavation / Hauling On-site Improvements DETENTION BASIN @ PARK SITE On site Rehabilitation 33 " RELIEF DRAIN (PCH to Valley Drive) 54" RELIEF DRAIN (Pier avenue to 17th Street) CONTINGENCY (15%) CY LS LS LF LF $7.00 $250,000.00 $50,000.00 $150.00 $200.00 30,000 1 1 1,750 1,350 $210,000.00 $250,000.00 $50,000.00 $262,500.00 $270,000.00 ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION (15%) TOTAL Costs for acquisition of right-of-way or easements have not been included. $156,375.00" $179,831.25 $1,378;706:25 • • • • • • • • • • HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED RELIEF FOR LACDPW s BOND ISSUE PROJECT NO. 440 ALTERNATIVE 4 MAY 30 , 1995 DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL DETENTION BASIN @ SCHOOL SITE Excavation / Hauling On-site Improvements DETENTION BASIN @ PARK SITE Excavation On-site Improvements 33 " RELIEF STORM DRAIN (PCH to Valley Drive) 54" RELIEF DRAIN (Pier avenue to 17th Street) CONTINGENCY (15%) CY LS CY LS LF LF $7.00 17,000 $100,000.00 1 $7.00 45,000 $100,000.00 1 $150.00 1,750 $200.00 1,350 $119,000.00 $100,000.00 $315,000.00 $100,000.00 $262,500.00 $270,000.00 ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION (15%) TOTAL. Costs for acquisition of right-of-way or easements have not been included. $174,975.00 $201,221.25 $1,542;696:25: • • • • • • • • • • • Costs for acquisition of right-of-way or easements have not been included. HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED RELIEF FOR LACDPW's BOND ISSUE PROJECT NO. 440 ALTERNATIVE 5 MAY 30 , 1995 DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL DETENTION BASIN @ PARK SITE On-site Improvements 33 " RELIEF DRAIN ( PCH to Valley Park) 51 " RELIEF DRAIN ( Valley Park Avenue to 51 " Storm Drain) 54" RELIEF DRAIN (Pier avenue to 17th Street) 60" RELIEF DRAIN (Tunnel Installation) 60" RELIEF DRAIN (Trench Installation) LS LF LF LF LF LF $50,000.00 $150.00 $180.00 $200.00 $1,250.00 $220.00 1 1,750 700 1,350 700 1,400 $50,000.00 $262,500.00 $126,000.00 $270,000.00 $875,000.00 $308,000.00 CONTINGENCY (15%) $283,725.00 ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION (15%) $326,283.75 TOTAL $2,501,508.75 Costs for acquisition of right-of-way or easements have not been included. HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE PROPOSED RELIEF FOR LACDPW's BOND ISSUE PROJECT NO. 440 ALTERNATIVE 6 MAY 30 , 1995 UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL DETENTION BASIN @ PARK SITE On-site Improvements LS $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 33 "RELIEF DRAIN LF $150.00 1,750 $262,500.00 ( PCH to Valley Park) 54 "RELIEF DRAIN LF $200.00 300 $60,000.00 ( 17th to 72" Relief Drain) 54" RELIEF DRAIN LF $200.00 1,350 $270,000.00 (Pier avenue to 17th Street) 60 " RELIEF DRAIN LF $220.00 300 $66,000.00 ( Power Street to 72" Relief Drain) 78 "RELIEF DRAIN LF $1,350.00 700 $945,000.00 (Tunnel Installation) 78 "RELIEF DRAIN LF $280.00 1,400 $392,000.00 (Trench Installation) CONTINGENCY (15%) $306,825.00 ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION (15%) $352,848.75 TOTAL $2;7.05;1.73.75 Costs for acquisition of right-of-way or easements have not been included. • • • • • • • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage IV -2 VALLEY DRIVE STORM DRAIN EVALUATION Preliminary evaluation of five alternate solutions to relieve deficiencies in the existing Valley Drive Storm Drain (LACDPW's Bond Issue Project 440 - Unit 2, Line D, and Bond Issue Project 623 - Unit 2, Lines A and B) was conducted and submitted to the city in a letter report dated, January 29, 1996. A copy of this letter report is included in the following pages as Exhibit IV -B. K M Km CONSULTING ENGINEERS January 29, 1996 City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Attention: Ms. Amy Amirani Director of Public Works Exhibit IV -B AKM Consulting Engineers 101 Pacifica, Suite 150 Irvine, California 92718 (71,1)753-7333, Fax: (714)753-7320 Subject: Preliminary Evaluation of Alternate Solutions to Alleviate Flooding in Valley Drive, South of Pier Avenue. Dear Ms. Amirani: This letter presents our findings and recommendations resulting from evaluation of alternate solutions to alleviate the existing flooding problems along Valley Drive, between Pier Avenue and Herondo Street. This area is served by an existing storm drain, referred to herein as the Valley Drive Storm Drain, constructed by Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) • as Bond Issue Project 623 and Project 440 - Unit 2 - Line D. The Valley Drive Storm Drain runs along Valley Drive from 8th Street to Herondo drain, outletting to LACDPW's Bond Issue Project No. 1105 (Herondo Drain) at the intersection of Herondo Street and Valley Drive. A major portion of the storm water tributary to this drain is generated in the southeast quadrant of the City, and conveyed via two lateral storm drains located in 3rd Street and 8th Street. • A drainage area of approximately 208 acres is tributary to the Valley Drive Storm Drain. Peak runoff rates generated in this drainage area were calculated at 375 cfs, 429 cfs and 490 cfs for 10, 25 and 50 -year frequency storms, respectively. However, the design capacity of the existing storm drain system, including the tabled design capacity of Herondo Drain to accept flows from the Valley • Drive Storm Drain, is limited to 187 cfs, i.e. less than 50% of the tributary 10 -year flows. Furthermore, based on a presently ongoing hydrology study of the Herondo Drain by Boyle Engineering for the City of Redondo Beach, the capacity of Herondo Drain is less than the 10 -year peak flows generated in its approximately 4.5 square mile watershed. • Due to insufficient capacity in the existing Valley Drive Storm Drain, coupled with potentially surcharged conditions in the existing Herondo Drain, the drainage system is severely deficient to provide adequate protection during any major storm event. Furthermore, based on the CCTV Survey, recently performed by the City, severe structural defects including collapsed pipe segments were identified in the Valley Drive Storm Drain between 2nd Street and Herondo Drive. • r\wm prlo.wz.\2_a_.d.ltr • • • City of Hermosa Beach Ms. Amy Amirani January 29, 1996 Page Two Five alternatives to alleviate the existing deficiency in the Valley Drive Storm Drain have been evaluated, as a part of the drainage master plan study for the City of Hermosa Beach. Layouts, • preliminary sizes, and peak flows for each alternative are shown on attached Figures 1 through 5, along with their respective preliminary quantity and cost estimates summarized in attached Tables 1 through 5. It should be noted that since another proposed relief storm drain in Hermosa Avenue and 2nd Street is also impacted by Alternatives 3, 4 and 5, cost estimates for this relief drain have been included in all the alternatives evaluated. • • • • Due to the existence of nine (9) sump areas in the drainage area tributari-to Valley Drive Storm Drain, peak flow rates for 50 -year storm were used to establish preliminary sizes of the proposed facilities. Following is a brief discussion on each of the alternatives evaluated: Alternative 1 Alternative 1 provides full conveyance capacity by proposing to construct a parallel storm drain system to replace the existing storm drain in Valley Drive. This Alternative includes the construction of a new 36 to 84 -inch diameter storm drain along Valley Drive, from a sump location at 11th Street to Herondo Drain. The peak 50 -year design flow at its outlet to Herondo Drain will be 490 cfs. However, since the tabled design capacity of Herondo Drain to accept flows from the Valley Drive Storm Drain is limited to 187 cfs, Alternative 1 can only be feasible if Herondo Drain were to be upgraded to accommodate higher flows. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $1.52 million. • Alternative 2 • • • Alternative 2 utilizes two detention basins to retard flows tributary to the Valley Drive Storm Drain and attenuate the peak discharge from its tributary drainage area to less than the conveyance capacity of the existing drain in Valley Drive. It also reduces the flows discharged to Herondo Drain to less than 85% of the allowable inlet capacity tabled for Herondo Drain. The 15% reduction in allowable discharge to the Herondo Drain is to account for the potential increase in Herondo Drain's mainline flows attributed to the increase in duration of the retarded peak discharging from the detention basins. a\.vp6WMvp6ile.\u.\2_a_.d.►u • • • • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Ms. Amy Amirani January 29, 1996 Page Three The two detention basins are proposed to be located in the Greenbelt corridor between Ardmore Avenue and Valley Drive. These basins will be in the vicinity of the existing lateral storm drains in 8th Street and 3rd Street, with storage capacities of 12 and 5 acre-feet, respectively. The basins can be integrated with the Greenbelt such that its present uses and characteristics are maintained. The basins should be designed to function as flow -by basins, so that flow may enter the basins only after the downstream storm drains have reached their conveyance capacities. Primary advantages of this Alternative is that it eliminates the need of any additional conveyance requirements, and therefore minimizes the cost of storm drains construction. It also reduces discharges to Herondo Drain to approximately 156 cfs (i.e. less than 85 % of 187 cfs), and can therefore be implemented without requiring any improvement to the existing Herondo Drain.. Major disadvantage of this Alternative is that it includes detention basins that will have high maintenance costs, and will require closure of public access to the greenbelt during major storm events. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $1.62 million. Alternative 3 Alternative 3, like Alternative 1, provides for full conveyance of tributary peak flows, except that it provides a diversion drain for flows that exceed to allowable tabled capacity to outlet into Herondo Drain (187 cfs). This Alternative requires a diversion of approximately 309 cfs in a 69 -inch storm drain in 2nd Street, from Valley Drive westerly to outlet to the ocean. West of Hermosa Avenue this proposed 2nd Street Diversion Drain increases to 84 -inches diameter pipe because it can be utilized to intercept additional flows at this intersection, thereby further eliminating deficiencies in Hermosa Avenue between 2nd Street and Herondo Street. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $2 million. Alternative 4 Alternative 4 is similar to Alternative 3, except it diverts all the flows in the proposed Valley Drive Storm Drain to the 2nd Street Diversion Drain. This Alternative diverts approximately 463 cfs in the 2nd Street Diversion Drain, thereby increasing its pipe size in the proposed 2nd Street Diversion Drain from Valley Drive to Hermosa Avenue to 84 -inch RCP, and from Hermosa Avenue.to the ocean to 10'(W) x 5'(H) RCB. • • • • • • • City of Hermosa Beach Ms. Amy Amirani January 29, 1996 Page Four The benefit of this Alternative, as compared to Alternative 3, is that it also provides a significant relief for the existing Herondo Drain. Preliminary review of existing data for Herondo Drain (existing design data gathered from LACDPW and revised hydrologic data provided by Boyle Engineering) indicates that the diversion of Hermosa Beach flows tributary to Herondo Drain from Valley Drive and Hermosa Avenue will reduce the tabled mainline flows in Herondo Drain by approximately 160 cfs, making the existing capacity of Hermosa Drain adequate to convey 10 -year storm flow from the remainder of its watershed. Furthermore, by diverting all the flow in the Valley Drive Storm Drain to the proposed 2nd Street Diversion Drain, the defective piping south of 2nd Street can be abandoned, thereby, saving the cost of repairing/replacing this pipe as required in Alternatives 2 and 3. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $2.03 million. Alternative 5 Alternative 5 is a combination of Alternative 2 and Alternative 4 Like in Alternative 4, it diverts flows from Valley Drive to the ocean in the 2nd Street Diversion- Drain; and like in Alternative 2 it utilizes detention basins in the greenbelt to minimize the need for constructing additional storm drains in Valley Drive and also reducing the sizes required for the 2nd Street Diversion Drain. The estimated project cost for this alternative is approximately $1.82 million. Based on a comparative analysis of the five alternate solutions outlined above, following are our conclusions: ■ The five alternatives evaluated can be divided in two categories: Alternatives 1, 2 and 3 primarily relieve the flooding problem in the City of Hermosa Beach; while Alternatives 4 and 5 offer regional benefits by providing additional relief to Herondo Drain. • ■ Alternative 1 requires additional capacity in the Herondo Drain and, therefore, cannot be implemented unless Herondo Drain is upgraded to accommodate additional flows. • Alternatives 2 and 5 are both cost-effective solutions in their respective categories. However, they are less desirable because they require constructing detention facilities in the Greenbelt. • r.1wvp60\wpfluUtn\2 st d.ltt ITU • • City of Hermosa Beach Ms. Amy Amirani January 29, 1996 Page Five • Alternatives 3 and 4 provide full conveyance capacity for the deficiencies in Valley Drive and Hermosa Avenue by diverting flows to the proposed 2nd Street Diversion Drain. Alternative 3 utilizes the tabled design capacity in Herondo Drain, while Alternative 4 • essentially diverts all tributary flows to the 2nd Street Diversion Drain, thereby significantly relieves Herondo Drain as well. Although the project cost for Alternative 4 is estimated to approximately equal Alternative 3, Alternative 4 provides significantly more value by improving the overall drainage condition in the region. Our recommendation is that the City of Hermosa Beach, in conjunction with other jurisdictional agencies such as LACDPW and the City of Redondo Beach, should pursue the implementation of Alternative 4. • If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 714-753-7333. Very truly yours, AKMConsulting Engineers ( Mohammed Rowdier Project Manager • • • • c:Furp601wpFibUtn12_st d.ltt • I • •I • =MI PACIFIC COST MIOMYr • 26 cfa KKK a. Z4' Eat 1 f F IK ST .CIFIC COAST woo. 111 (8'CMP(•) VALLEY DRIVE S. D. 0. CrFMSS 1 .(�. My'� X24 f • F (s • 245 cfa ivf f • 1. :S. 24' . 4 Nst 050' 24' 11 050- 364 cfa cr. • 490 cf SALE. 1. S00. HERONDO DRAIN a& Cr. - 71T kW. SUMPS PROP. SD WITH SIZES (IN INCHES). EXIST SD WITH SIZES (IN INCHES). * ) EXIST SD TO BE ABANDONED. MEM MEW 0' C a_ PACIFIC OCEAN AKA CONSULTING ENGINEERS 101 PACIFICA, SUITE 150 IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92710 (714) 753-7333 I VIA 4 FIG I MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE VALLEY DRIVE S. D. RELIEF Al TFRNIAT 1 vc 1 iG'I 1 • • • Ji SII'1 I /n! COZ ' MCIT ICOW WOW' 4 • 26 cfe f PINS ST XCMN •I[M •K, 36' KWIC CYST MIOIMI SCALE, ,... 500. HERONDO DRAIN INS i 9 tI 9 AF IiETENTION BASIN VALLEY DRIVE 36' SUMPS PROP. SD WITH SIZES (IN INCHES). - EXIST. SD WITH SIZES (IN INCHES). iE ) EXIST. SD TO BE ABANDONED. 49 WHYS Man PACIFIC OCEAN AKM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 101 PACIFICA. SUITE 150 IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92718 GIIT MI MUM NM. 0Y111•10I• fiX I FIG. 2 MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE VALLEY DRIVE S.D. RELIEF •I rrou•rn,r o 27' j • • • OCEAN T'ACIi IC tour M1� Z4T • 26 cfa E E PIK ST. i OCEAN TICS 36' ACI,IC COACT PIGMY 111 36—I .r 18'CMP(•1 VALLEY DRIVE S. D. L L (•- 050 • 245 cfa 24_• .. . 6 SUMPS i I • ATC. .Y 2A• 11 • 181 cfa SCALE, HERONDO DRAIN I• S IVERS ION IURA I N f 24' PROP. SD WITH SIZES (IN INCHES). EXIST. SD WITH SIZES (IN INCHES). 1E EXIST. SD TO BE ABANDONED. Cust1I Cr. IOITEST WO. •wrrw MOW 124 I, PACIFIC OCEAN w 050. 345 cfa ooNawsrNa AVM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 101 P.150 IRVINEE.IFICACALIFORNNIAE92718 UNOIN••P (714) 7S3-7137 NTT I 10.0114 QA•\ CAIMIOMA IFIG. 3 MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE VALLEY DRIVE S.D. RELIEF Al TFRNAT I VF I 1 • • • E MCI! IC COAST MIOM AT 24' K V IC COAST MICIm$T la" CMP (. ) VALLEY DRIVE S. D. I }AI E SUMPS PROP. SD WITH SIZES (IN INCHES). 2j EXIST. SD WITH SIZES (IN INCHES). iE) EXIST. SD TO BE ABANDONED. i MOPSIMS °CFM .IC. 1 36' AK. p S IIVERS I ON SURA I N 1 amass ( MAIMRYI 025 PACIFIC OCEAN 27' SCALE, S00. HERONDO DRAIN 3 ! w O50' 500 cis • v •NOINUMR m 1'v I FIG. 4 AKM CONSULTING ENGINEERS SITS OP IAA SPASM CIAu.�.A 101 PACIFICA. SUITE ISG MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92718 VALLEY DRIVE S.D. RELIEF (7141 7S3-7113 Al TEPWAT!vr 4 OCEAN a. i E ISOIC IIIc OX/S. VIER � ►Eelne COAST wlfM�r Z4 .7....".CIr IC CWST MICNf �� � — . 26 cfa AROMME LI1 18'CMP(.)- 245 cfa' CYPRESS 36' AVE. 4' Tst 4.90 9 AF 02TENTION BASIN JIVALLEY DRIVE r S. D. 050- 149 cfa 5 AF 3 1 -.1114Wir 050- fa 11 1� S CW[A CT. MIME •M. VERSION! (URA I N SUMPS PROP. SD WITH SIZES (IN INCHES). EXIST SD WITH SIZES (IN INCHES). * ) EXIST SD TO BE ABANDONED. 1111111.111 IwwCTTW MOW 5 - ca u SCALE., • 500, HERONDO DRAIN If r 1511 11111 wiiie PACIFIC OCEAN 27' - >v 050. 125 cfa FIG. 5 OCNWL.T=NIM ■ oIN■■A (714) 753-7333 AKM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 101 PACIFICA. SUITE 150 IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92718 CITE r MANY as fYUr/w. MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE VALLEY DRIVE S. D. RELIEF AI TFRNAT !VP' S • • • • • • • • 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE VALLEY DRIVE (LACDPW s BOND TABLE 1 623) COST ESTIMATES EVALUATION FOR STORM DRAIN RELIEF ISSUE PROJECT NO. ALTERNATIVE 1 JANUARY 29, 1996 DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL 84" STORM DRAIN (in Valley Dr. between 8th Street to Herondo) 36" STORM DRAIN (in Valley Dr. between 11th Street to 8th Street) 24" STORM DRAIN (in 5th Street between Ardmore and Valley Dr.) 24" STORM DRAIN (in Hermosa Ave. between 4th Street to 2nd. Street) 36" STORM DRAIN (in 2nd. Street between Hermosa Ave. to Outlet) APPURTENANCES LF LF LF LF LF LS $285.00 $160.00 $120.00 $120.00 $160.00 2,300 900 200 500 400 $655,500.00 $144,000.00 $24,000.00 $60,000.00 $64,000.00 $200,000.00 SUBTOTAL $1,147,500.00 CONTINGENCY (15%) $172 125_ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $1 319,625.00 ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION(1.) 5'?t% 19.r`t74r .7'Pa.�4- 33.',�FJ5'.a ry 6h rif5^p�w � i , .2y ^c.,.`fw+'�F..M% r�Gy J.1r i ,. ..0-�i .- l] �iL (�.�J,,.r; . J•**' '„y G rEy (°" J .I YY , fxF W �,y''>. , 1'7fVMYY)�Ny LY }i4Y. .t,=4,1 ,tS l s�+ »1� 0 A,Y94 553 6::q »1."^«.zx�ya✓/ At .CY - x x • 'Costs for upgrading of Herondo Storm Drain has not been included. • • • • • • • • • • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE TABLE 2 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION FOR VALLEY DRIVE STORM DRAIN RELIEF (LACDPW s BOND ISSUE PROJECT NO. 623) ALTERNATIVE 2 JANUARY 29. 1999 DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL DETENTION BASIN 1 Excavation Fill Site Improvements / Utility Modification Splitting Structure and Appurtenances DETENTION BASIN 2 Excavation Fill Site Improvements / Utility Modification Splitting Structure and Appurtenances 36" STORM DRAIN (in Valley Dr. between 11th Street to 8th Street) 24" STORM DRAIN (in 5th Street between Ardmore and Valley Dr.) 24" STORM DRAIN (in Hermosa Ave. between 4th Street to 2nd. Street) 36" STORM DRAIN (in 2nd. Street between Hermosa Ave. to Outlet) APPURTENANCES REPLACE DEFECTIVE PIPE SEGMENTS (In Valley Dr. between 2nd Street and Herondo Ave.) CY CY LS LS CY CY LS LS LF LF LF LF LS LF $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $160.00 $120.00 $120.00 $160.00 $250.00 10,000 2,000 6,000 800 900 200 500 400 200 $70,000.00 $14,000.00 $200,000.00 $100,000.00 $42,000.00 $5,600.00 $150,000.00 $100,000.00 $144,000.00 $24,000.00 $60,000.00 $64,000.00 $200,000.00 $50,000.00 SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY (15%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION (15%) $11223,600.00 $183,540.00 $1 407,140.00 $211,071.00 • 'Costs for acquisition of right-of-way or easements have not been included. • • • • • • • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE VALLEY DRIVE (LACDPW s BOND TABLE 3 FOR RELIEF NO. 623) COST ESTIMATES EVALUATION STORM DRAIN ISSUE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE 3 JANUARY 29, 1996 UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL , 36"STORM DRAIN (in Valley Dr. between 11th Street to 8th Street) LF $160.00 900 $144,000.00 84" STORM DRAIN (in Valley Dr. between 8th Street to Herondo) LF $285.00 2,300 $655,500.00 69" STORM DRAIN (in 2nd Street between Valley Blvd. to Hermosa Ave.) LF $250.00 1,050 $262,500.00 84" STORM DRAIN (in 2nd Street between Hermosa Ave. to Outlet) LF $285.00 400 $114,000.00 24" STORM DRAIN (in 5th Street between Ardmore and Valley Dr.) LF $120.00 200 $24,000.00 24" STORM DRAIN (in Hermosa Ave. between 4th Street to 2nd. Street) LF $120.00 500 $60,000.00 APPURTENANCES LS $200,000.00 REPLACE DEFECTIVE PIPE SEGMENTS LF $250.00 200 $50,000.00 (In Valley Dr. between 2nd Street and Herondo Ave.) SUBTOTAL $17510,000.00 CONTINGENCY (15%) 226,500.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $1,736,500.00 ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION (15%) $260,475.00 prix �t3hxr � rrr *1 a.cq�n5.��,ri �. .t}.� �My rx ar ', *,}„ ` .' �, i." p ..�".26s z c`.iir l i`�i -1,' .' 4 w � Ai t; .`'xf2 �.:e't. <A3tnv'`"1Er� �T"'1 al'f ', �i 4 n .t 1i1, i •.y 3 o J tYw,f�ay' Y.^C . d3ysC. .Jr �` c'^- �F.st yf..- .,+ Tk (��]6 0U i" r3 �' ��79U,97YY. ' v r., .rr%�kGw<'4.. K-.>. s.--. ..-....�..... ., .... . ♦.,,n....... ^.t+w—n.::.Y.'*..iiPaX<.. �tlx i« r :. .r: � S'f,�J • • • • • • • • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE VALLEY DRIVE (LACDPW's BOND ALTERNATIVE ABLE 4 ESTIMATES FOR DRAIN RELIEF NO. 623) 4 COST EVALUATION STORM ISSUE PROJECT JANUARY 29, 1996 • DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL 36"STORM DRAIN (in Valley Dr. between 11th Street to 8th Street) 84" STORM DRAIN (in Valley Dr. between 8th Street to Herondo) 84"STORM DRAIN (in 2nd Street between Valley Blvd. to Hermosa Ave.) 1070' STORM DRAIN (in 2nd Street between Hermosa Ave. to Outlet) 24" STORM DRAIN (in 5th Street between Ardmore and Valley Dr.) 24"STORMDRAIN (in Hermosa Ave. between 4th Street to 2nd. Street) APPURTENANCES LF LF LF LF LF LS $160.00 $285.00 . $280.00 $400.00 $120.00 $120.00 900 2,300 1,050 400 200 500 $144,000.00 $655,500.00 $294,000.00 $160,000.00 $24,000.00 $60,000.00 $200,000.00 SUBTOTAL $1,537,500.00 CONTINGENCY (15%) $230,625.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $1,768,125.00 ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION (15%) $265,218.75 TQTAi t.. h y. �f � 14i i:..fi' ... D l''':,1--: ..''' der 5[n u l �i. '". P' rt .'`, .'r .� 3.". _ , 44. +«bY, ^a4s,P N. X+C' " .{ 'i i,,',,'µµ ti. •n •, .Z' 1 a x,_.f.,�,a..l �p Tf. t^. b ,iT . sig, � .p, 'v�� — w., F t '4 Sw• 1't. . .i'�o. - '� .". [?,syY,T� - ' .' N��x xrte,' `;_ � .� � s! ..¢ * � ,�.. � y s A��,n� <y. .. 33" 3 ,3"4 033;a43:75'. 3 75` .• . • • • • • • • • • • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE TABLE 5 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION FOR VALLEY DRIVE STORM DRAIN RELIEF (LACDPW s BOND ISSUE PROJECT NO. 623) ALTERNATIVE 5 JANUARY 29, 1996 DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL DETENTION BASIN 1 (See Altemative 2) DETENTION BASIN 2 (See Altemative 2) 36" STORM DRAIN (in Valley Dr. between 11th Street to 8th Street) 48" STORM DRAIN (in 2nd. Street between Valley Dr. to Hermosa Ave.) 60" STORM DRAIN (in 2nd. Street between Hermosa Ave to Outlet) 24" STORM DRAIN (in 5th Street between Ardmore and Valley Dr.) 24" STORM DRAIN (in Hermosa Ave. behveen 4th Street to 2nd. Street) APPURTENANCES SUBTOTAL LS LS LF LF LF LF LF LS $160.00 $170.00 $220.00 $120.00 $120.00 900 1,050 400 200 500 $384,000.00 $297,600.00 $144,000.00 $178,500.00 $88,000.00 $24,000.00 $60,000.00 $200,000.00 CONTINGENCY (15%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ADMIN. / ENGIN. / INSPECTION (15%) $1 376,100.00 $206,415.00 $17582,515.00 237,377.25 'Costs for acquisition of right-of-way or easements have not been included. • • City of Hermosa Beach Master Plan of Drainage SECTION V PROJECT PRIORITY All the storm drainage improvements recommended in this master plan study have • been broken down into projects and prioritized for implementation. The prioritization of the projects is based on the following criteria: • • Priority 1: Priority 2: Priority 3: Projects required to relieve severe deficiencies in the existing storm drains serving the City. Projects required to relieve sump areas not included in Priority 1. Projects that are extensions to the existing drainage system in streets that do not have adequate capacity, or to service local sump conditions (sumps created by a depression or sag in the street profile). • Project Priorities are shown in Figure V-1, Project Priority Map. A brief description of each Priority Project along with their respective Capital Costs are listed in Table V-1, Summary of Priority Projects. • • • • V-1 • VKM 2-4 MANHATTAN BEACH 3-5 LEGEND PRIORITY I PROJECTS PRIORITY 2 PROJECTS PRIORITY 3 PROJECTS - — — EX I ST. STORM DRAIN ' - • - . 3-1 3- I 3- I 2 2-2 2-2 ; 1 y, 2-2 ;. • ; . . ; 1 i 11 '• • liDON.DO E3EACH F IGURE X-1 CM OF HERMOSA BEACH. CALIFORNIA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE PROJECT PRIORITY MAP • • • • • • • • • • TABLE V-1 SUMMARY OF PRIORITY PROJECTS PRIORITY PROJECT No. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CAPITAL COSTS 1 1-1 Storm drain in 2nd Street from Valley Drive to $750,600 Ocean Outlet . 1 1-2 27 ac -feet volume Detention Basin @ Valley Park. $415,000 1 1-3 10 ac -feet volume Detention Basin @ Hermosa $229,000 Valley School. TOTAL FOR PRIORITY:1 PROJECTS $1,394,600 2 2-1 Storm drain in Valley Drive from 11th Street to $990,904 2nd Street . Storm drain in 4th Street from Pacific Coast $271,161 Highway to Valley Drive. 2 2-2 Storm drain in Pier Avenue from Monterey to Valley Drive $208,800 Storm drain in Beach Drive ocean outlets $180,900 @ 10th Street and @l3th Street 2 2-3 Storm drain in Ingleside Drive from 30th Street to $423,810 Gould Ave., and Storm drain in Morningside Drive from 29th Ct. to 27th Street 2 2-4 Storm drain in Strand from 30th P1. to 35th $555,146 Street and Storm drain in Beach Drive from 21st Street to 18th Street and in 18th Street from Hermosa Ave. to Beach Drive. 2 2-5 Storm drain in Upper Pier Ave. from Bay View $320,901 to Palm Drive and Storm drain in Hermosa Ave. from 10th Street to Pier Ave. TOTAL: FOR PRIORITY 2 PROJECTS $2,951,622 • • • • PRIORITY PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION CAPITAL COSTS 3 3-1 Storm drain in 21st Street from PCH to Ardmore $634,941 Drive and in Ardmore Drive from 21st Street to 17th Street. 3 3-2 Storm drain in 14th Street from Prospect Ave. to Bonnie Brae. $115,050 3 3-3 Storm drain in Aviation from Owosso to Aubrey Park Court. $115,309 3 3-4 Storm drain in Gould Ave. from $485,976 Pacific Coast Highway to Valley Drive. 3 3-5 Storm drain in Hermosa Ave. from 24th Street to $465,145 21st Street and in 22nd from Hermosa Ave. Beach Drive. 3 3-6 Storm drain in 5th Street from $180,500 Prospect to Pacific Coast Highway. 3 3-7 Storm drain in 2nd Street from $446,500 Prospect to Pacific Coast Highway. 3 3-8 Storm drain in 35th Street from Manhattan Blvd. to ocean outlet and in Hermosa Ave. from $321,234 Longfellow Ave. to 35th Street. 3 3-9 Storm drain in various sumps around $494,250 6th Street and in 4th Street to Hermosa Ave. 3 3-10 Storm drain in Ardmore from 1st Pl. to Herondo $113,844 Drain. 3 3-11 Storm drain in 18th Street from Prospect to PCH. $177,750 3 3-12 Storm drain in 16th Street from Prospect to PCH. $194,700 TOTAL FOR PRIORITY 3 PROJECTS: $3,745,199 TOTAL $8,091,421 Mayor and Members of the City Council April 15, 1996 City Council Meeting April 23, 1996 ORDINANCE NO. 96-1155 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS OR AMENDING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELETING OUT-OF-DATE MATERIAL FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 96-1155, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of April 9, 1996, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration and was amended to delete sections 5, 6 and 7, relating to purchasing, and to renumber the sections. The ordinance was then introduced, as amended, by the following vote: AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Noted: Stephen R. Bur City Manager laine Doer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 96-1155 AN -ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS OR AMENDING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND 'THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELETING OUT OF DATE MATERIAL FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS the City of Hermosa Beach is undergoing a major revision to its Municipal Code and wishes not to continue to include material that is out of date due to changes in the California state law, state and federal court decisions, or usage by the City of Hermosa Beach. NOW, 'THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF IHE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 1-8. "Prison labor on city streets, etc. - Authorized."; Section 1-9. "Same - Labor in lieu of payment of fine."; and Section 1-10. "Same - Enforcement of two preceding sections." shall be deleted in their entirety.. SECTION 2: Section 2-3.1 "Travel expenses for elected officials, officers and employees.", shall be deleted in its entirety and now shall read, "Travel expenses for elected officials, officers and employees may be reimbursed for actual and necessary travel and conference expenses incurred in the performance of official duties subject to limitations that shall be set by resolution of the City Council." SECTION 3: Section 2-4.5. "Compensation of city council." shall be amended to read, "Effective April 15, 1986, each member of the city council shall be compensated the amount of three hundreds dollars ($300.00).pursuant to the provisions of Section 36516 and 36516.2, Government Code, State of California." SECTION 4: Section 2-13. "Traveling expenses." shall be amended to read, "The city manager shall be reimbursed for all sums necessarily incurred or paid by him in the performance of his duties or incurred when traveling on business pertaining to the city under direction of the city council. Reimbursement shall only -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 be made, however, when a verified itemized claim, setting forth the sums expended for such business for which reimbursement is requested and has been presented to SECTION 5: Section 2-61. "Interest in contracts, etc." shall be amended to read, "Pursuant to sections 1090, 1091 and 1091.5 and sections 36525, 36526 and 36526.5 of the state Government Code, no officer shall have an interest be inteFested in any contract made in their official capacity, nor be purchasers at any sale or vendors at any purchase made by them in their official capacity." SECTION 6: Article VIII. FUNDS, DIVISION 1. CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND, Section 2-83. "Created; purposes." and Section 2-84. "Expenditures from fund." shall be deleted in their entirety. SECTION 7: Section 2-111. "Schedule of fees and service charges." shall be amended to read, "Fees and service charges, whether or not provided for elsewhere by ordinance, shall be set and adjusted by resolution of the city council following a public report and recommendation from the city staff reflecting the cost reasonably borne and the recommended percentage of recovery, except that the city manager .is hereby empowered to set a fee for service requests when no fee has otherwise been established, and the request cannot be met unless the city incurs costs that can be reasonably borne from fees and charges. Fees specified shall be effective only after meeting the requirements set forth for public hearings in -Section -54993. To the extent possible, the city's fees and charges shall be fixed by one master fee resolution of the council." SECTION 8: Section 2-120. "Duty of design review board to review plans." and Section 2-121 "Categorical exemptions." shall be amended to remove reference to Lection 7 4-41 and to insert section 7-1.7 in its place. SECTION 9: Section 2-122 `Filing plan and referral to design review board", shall be -2- .... . , .. - ti 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 amended to remove reference to section 7 1.11 and to insert section 7-1.7 in its place and sub- section (A)(3)(j) shall be amended to read "projects which are not exempt from state law are to be signed by an architect or registered building designer. • • :", and to delete sub - subsections i and ii. SECTION 10: Section 4-11. "Duration of license; license fees." shall be amended in subsection (a)(1) to read, "Exception: For dogs owned by senior citizens of the city, age sixty (60) or over, showing proof of age, the license fee shall be fifty (50) percent of the rate established by this section. SECTION 11: Section 4-11(c) shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 12: Section 4-14. "License forms." shall be amended to read, "The finance department is hereby authorized and directed to cause to be printed annually such number of dog license forms as may be necessary,..." SECTION 13: Section 4-15. "License tag" shall be amended to read, "The finance department shall likewise procure metal tags bearing inscriptions showing the year for which the same shall be issued and the number thereof,.." SECTION 14: Section 4-17. "Notice Report of impounded dogs to be posted." shall be amended to read, "The contractor, acting as poundmaster of the city, upon impounding any dog found running at large, shall immediately file a report of the dog. • . » containing a brief description -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 15: Section 4-25. "Tag to be stamped with type of vaccine used, etc." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 16: Section 4-26. "Impoundment for failure to wear license tag." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 17: Section 17-54. "Violation of permit procedures." shall be amended to read: "Any person who refuses to purchase a permit for a garage sale or yard sale, or who conducts a fourth garage or yard sale within any twelve-month period, shall be guilty of an infraction ofo the -law as set forth in Section 1-7 of the Municipal Code. - . . SECTION 18: Section 19-15. "Crossing through, under, etc., barriers at railroad grade crossings.", shall be repealed in its entirety. SECTION 19: Section 19-24. `Blocking of railroad crossings by trains.", shall be repealed in its entirety. SECTION 20: Section 21-5. "Firearms --Permit to possess." shall be repealed in its entirety. SECTION 21: Section 21-6. "Same Firearms --Permit to discharge." shall be amended to read: "It is hereby declared unlawful for any person to discharge any gun, rifle, pistol, revolver, slingshot or air gun within the city without first obtained a permit in writing from the chief of the police department." SECTION 22: Section 21-34. "Threats with replica firearms." sub -section (a)(1) shall be amended to read: "As used in this section, the term replica firearm shall include any device or object made of plastic, wood, metal or any other material which is a facsimile or toy version of, or is otherwise recognizable as a pistol, revolver, shotgun, sawed-off shotgun, rifle, machine gun, rocket launcher, or any other firearm as that term is used under the provisions of Sections 12001 and 12002, 12020(D)(1) and 12570 of -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the State Penal Code." _ SECTION 23: Section 21-36 "Display of books, magazines and other publications in locations other than newsracks." shall be amended to read: "(a) Definitions. For the purpose of this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings as ascribed to them by this section: (1) "Matter" means any book, magazine, newspaper, video recording, or other printed or written material or any picture, drawing, photograph, motion picture, or other pictorial representation or any statue or other figure, or any recording, transcription, or mechanical, chemical, or electrical reproduction or any other articles, equipment, machines, or materials. (2) "Person" means any individual, partnership, firm, association, corporation, or other legal entity. (3) "Knowingly" means being aware of the character of the matter. (4) "Minor" means any natural person under 18 years of age. (5) "Harmful matter" means matter, taken as a whole, which to the average person, applying contemporary statewide standards, appeals to the prurient interest, and is matter which, taken as a whole, depicts or describes in a patently offensive way sexual conduct and which, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value for minors. Display of harmful matter. Every person who for commercial purposes displays by any means, or causes to be displayed by any means, or permits to be displayed by any means, in any business, other than a public place from which minors are excluded, any harmful matter, shall place upon the harmful matter a device commonly known as a "blinder rack" in front of the harmful matter, so that the lower two-thirds of the harmful matter is not exposed to view. (b) -5- (c) Minor need not view or gain control of material. To commit a violation of subsection (b) above, it is not required that a minor have actually viewed or physically gained control of any book, magazine, or other publication or matter as defined in subsection (a)(5) above. (d) Business persons responsible. The provisions of this chapter, with respect to the display, causing to be displayed or permitted to be displayed any book, magazine, or other publication as set forth in subsection (a) above, shall apply only to persons having proprietary interests in or managerial control of the ordinary and routine operation of the business wherein and at which time there occurs a violation of any of the provisions of this section. (e) Punishment. Every person who violates 21-36(b) is punishable by fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment." SECTION 24: Section 22-5.4 "Park reservations." shall be amended to include South Park at 425 Valley Drive. SECTION 25: Section 23-15. "Records to be kept; inspection of records.", shall be amended to read, "Every pawnbroker, secondhand dealer, junk dealer and junk collector shall keep a complete record of all goods, wares, merchandise or things pledged to or purchased or received by him which record shall contain all of the matters required to be shown in the reports referred to and described in Chapter 9 of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California.in sections 23 6 and 23 7...." SECTION 26: Section 23-17. "Limitation on sale of goods obtained by pawnbroker or secondhand dealer.", shall be amended to read: "It shall be unlawful for any pawnbroker or secondhand dealer .to sell or otherwise dispose of any article or thing within thirty testy-ene days after such article or thing has been purchased or received by such junk dealer or collector." SECTION 27: Section 23-19. "Exceptions to sections 2and 23-15 to 23-17.", shall -6- be amended to read: "The provisions contained in sections 23.7 and 23-15 to 23-17 shall not be deemed to apply to the purchase or sale by junk dealers or junk collectors of rags, bottles, other than milk or cream bottles, secondhand sacks,...." SECTION 28: Section 29-16. "Public hearing by council." shall be amended to read, "The council may from time to time call public hearings to ascertain whether the public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the removal of poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures within designated areas of the city and the undergrounding installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric, communication or similar or associated service. The city manager shall notify all affected property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, and utilities concerned, by mail of the time and place of such hearings at least tcn (10) fifteen (15) days prior to the date thereof...." SECTION 29: Section 30-2. "Tax for maintenance of parks, music and advertising purposes." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 30: Section 30-10.5. "Exclusions and exemptions." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 31: Section 30-10.6. "Application of provisions relating to exclusions and exemptions." shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 32: Section 30-29. "Exemptions of governments; agencies thereof from tax; collection by assessment." shall be deleted in its entirety in order to conform to new wording in Taxation and Revenue Code Section 11922 and shall read, "Any deed, instrument or writing to which the United States, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, any state or territory, or political subdivision thereof, is a party shall be exempt from any tax imposed pursuant to this part when the exempt agency is acquiring title." SECTION 33: Section 30-40. "Taxes - Amount." shall be amended to read, "Every person constructing a new dwelling unit shall pay to the city the—sum-of an • -7- 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 amount set by resolution of the city council, with the amount of the tax adjusted on an annual basis using the percentage increase in the cost of living as calculated by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Los Angeles -Anaheim - Riverside Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area, dollars -($33-500.00) for each new dwelling unit...". SECTION 34: Section 300. "Names of zones.", shall be amended to include the listing of, "0-S-2 Restricted Open Space Zone.", as shown in Article 9.52 of this Code. SECTION 35: This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 36: Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 37: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -8- -4 0'94,-/�S.� April 15, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 23, 1996 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 95-9 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROHIBITION OF ROOF SIGNS FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED BY STAFF Staff and Planning Commission Recommendation To introduce the attached ordinance to amend the sign ordinance roof sign definition, and to allow exceptions to the prohibition of roof signs. Background At their meeting of February 20, the Planning Commission voted 5:0 to recommend the subject amendments. At their September 19, 1995 meeting, the Commission adopted a policy to exclude "pre-existing architectural projections" from the definition of roof signs. The proposed text amendment and policy statement arose in connection with a sign located on the architectural projection of Sabroso's Grill. Pursuant to the current provision in the sign ordinance, roof signs are prohibited, and defined as follows: "Roof sign is a sign erected upon or above or extending above a roof or parapet of a building or structure." In reviewing the definition and another previous policy statement, staff found them to be ambiguous relative to signs located on parapets, which by definition extend above the roof. While the definition seems to prohibit any signs placed on a parapet, the policy statement implies otherwise.' Past practice has been to permit parapet signs, as well as signs on architectural features. 'To address the issue of whether a sign could be placed upon a parapet, the Planning Commission previously adopted a policy statement 93-2 which states that "Parapet walls cannot be constructed solely for the purpose of placing a sign above the roof line. Parapets may be erected only when in conjunction with the remodel of the existing facade." 1 4 Analysis The proposed text amendment would clarify the definition of roof sign with respect to the issues of the use of parapet walls for signs, and also the use of architectural features which project above a roof. (As in the example of Sabroso's Grill). The proposed amendment would add the following new definition for roof signs and an added definition for `roof line" Roof Sign: A sign erected above or extending above a roof line of a building or structure. Architectural projections above the roof line which function only as background for a sign shall be considered a sign structure. A sign located on such structure shall be considered a roof sign.". "Roof line: For the purposes of this Section, the roof line is considered the apparent uppermost edge of the roof or the top of a parapet, whichever forms the top line of the building silhouette or facade. Both the Commission and Staff noted that parapet wall signs should be permitted. Thus "Roof line" has been defined to prevent ambiguity relative to parapet wall signs. In order to allow roof signs in some limited circumstances, subject to Planning Commission approval Section 13.5-8, Prohibited Signs, sub -section (K) `roof signs" is proposed to be amended as follows: "K. Roof Signs. With the following exceptions: 1. Signs located on pre-existing architectural projections extending above a roof line that historically have been used for sign purposes may be permitted. 2. Signs located on projections above the roof line deemed by the Planning Commission to be architectural projections that are part of the architecture of the building and not solely for purposes of sign background may be allowed, subject to approval by the Planning Commission at a public meeting." Staff has surveyed three neighboring cities relative to roof signs (attached). Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach do not permit roof signs, Redondo Beach does not have a definition, and Manhattan Beach's is similar to Hermosa Beach's current definition. Torrance defines roof signs, but also allows them subject to certain provisions. 2 Staff also investigated several other sign ordinances relative to roof sign provisions with selected provisions attached. 4 Ken Robertson CONCUR: Associate Planner Sol Blum:? eld, Director Communi Development Department Stephen R. 'Firrell City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed ordinance 2. P.C. Resolution/Minutes 2/20/96 3. Roof sign examples 4. Provisions from other cities 5. Background P.C. Staff Reports and Minutes C: /winword/cc/srsign 3 ORDINANCE 96 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW ROOF SIGNS LOCATED ON PROJECTIONS ABOVE THE ROOF IF DETERMINED TO BE ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 23, 1996, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to amend the sign ordinance with respect to roof signs and to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Signs located on parapet walls which are part of the building facade should not be considered roof signs, which are prohibited. This should be clearly stated in the definition of roof sign; B. Certain roof signs which are located on architectural projections can enhance or contribute to a building's architectural appearance when integrated into the whole structure. These should be considered for possible exception to the roof sign prohibition on a case by case basis subject to Planning Commission approval and determination that the projection is architectural, and not only for the purposes of displaying a sign. C. The subject text amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the general rule set forth in Section 15061(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility that these modifications to the sign ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain that the Municipal Code, Appendix A, Zoning Ordinance, be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend the definition of "roof sign" as contained in Section 13.5-3(48) and add a definition for roof line to read as follows: "Roof Sign: A sign erected upon, above or extending above a roof line of a building or structure. Architectural projections above the roof line which function as background for a 1 2 Roof line: For the purposes of this Section, the roof line is considered the apparent p e whichever forms the top line of the 3 uppermost edge of the roof or the to of a parap t' 4 building silhouette or facade." 5 SECTION 2. Amend Section 13.5-8, Prohibited Signs, sub -section (K) "roof signs" 6 to read as follows: "K. Roof Signs. With the following exceptions: 8 projections extending above a roof line that 1 Signs located on pre-existing architectural p roJ u have historically been used for sign purposes. 92 Signs located on projections above the roof line that are o eemeddr by� the ePlanningof 10 Commission to be architectural projections that are part the building and not solely for purposes of sign background. 11 12 SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. 13 da s after the date of its adoption, 14 SECTION 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) Y a the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the f Easy Read o sae , Beacheklytne manner1 15 of general circulation published and circulated, in the City 16 provided by law. d of 17 SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and doptlln make his orminutdinance, a the shall enter the same in the book of oreinals ofrdtnances of said city, the proceedings of the City Council at which the 18 passage and adoption thereof in the co d 19 same is passed and adopted. vote: 20 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1996, by the following sign shall be considered a sign structure. A sign on such structure shall be considered a roof sign. 21 AYES: 22 NOES: ABSTAIN: 23 ABSENT: 24 25 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: 26 27 28 29 ATTEST: CITY CLERK F:b95\cclerk\ordins\new\roofsign CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION P.C. 96-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW ROOF SIGNS LOCATED ON PROJECTIONS ABOVE THE ROOF IF DETERMINED TO BE ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on September 19, December 5, 1995 and February 20, 1996, to consider amending the sign ordinance with respect to roof signs and to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Signs located on parapet walls which are an integral part of building facade should not be considered roof signs, which are prohibited. This should be clearly stated in the definition of roof sign; B. Certain roof signs which are located on architectural projections can enhance or contribute to a building's architectural appearance when integrated into the whole structure. These should be considered for possible exception to the roof sign prohibition on a case by case basis subject to Planning Commission approval and determination that the projection is architectural, and not only for the purposes of displaying a sign. C. The subject text amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the general rule set forth in Section 15061(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility that these modifications to the sign ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3.1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby recommends that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend the definition of "roof sign" as contained in Section 13.5-3(48) and add a definition for roof line to read as follows: "Roof Sign: A sign erected upon, above or extending above a roof line of a building or structure. Architectural projections above the roof line which function as background for sign shall be considered a sign structure. A sign on such structure shall be considered a roof sign. Roof line: For the purposes of this Section, the roof line is considered the apparent uppermost edge of the roof or the top of a parapet, whichever forms the top line of the building silhouette or facade. SECTION 2. Amend Section 13.5-8, Prohibited Signs, sub -section (K) "roof signs" to read as follows: "K. Roof Signs. With the following exceptions: 1. Signs located on pre-existing architectural projections extending above a roof line that have historically been used for sign purposes. 2. Signs located on projections above the roof line that are deemed by the Planning Commission to be architectural projections that are part of the architecture of the building and not solely for purposes of sign background. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Dettelbach,DiMonda,Merl,Perrotti,Chmn.Tucker NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 96-14 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their pregu eetingFebFry ry 20, 1996. - WCL. Peter Tucker, Chairman Sol Blume -ld, ecretary 3 -1q --9(e Date 7 AYES- Comm. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Merl Perrotti, Chmn. NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: 14. TEXT 95-9 -- TEXT AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS (Continued from December 5, 1995 and January 16, 1996 meetings) Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said text amendment Director Blumenfeld said Staff had a problem dealing with the definition of "historic sign". The issue of historic architecture can be addressed via Section K, Roof Signs, by stating that if an area has historically been used as a sign board, which is an architectural projection, that is enough criteria to permit it as a new sign area. Comm. Di Monda discussed current historical signage with Staff. Chmn. Tucker opened the Public Hearing at 10:27 p.m. No one wished to speak, and Chmn. Tucker closed the Public Hearing at 10:27 p.m. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Dettelbach, to APPROVE Staff s recommendation. AYES: Comm. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Merl Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker NOES:- None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 15. XT 96-2 -- TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD YOUTH HOSTEL T I C-2 PE ' ' TTED USE LIST. taff Recomme + ed Action: To recommend approval of said text ame Director Blumenfeld said this item related to a compliance order Avenue. A new tenant wishes to estab 1 • a youth hostel, desc rather than a hotel or motel. The permittee e list d Blumenfeld said the issue before the Commission w C-2 and C-3 zones. Chmn. Tucker said he did no . gree many hours of operation, lock out times an. . ccess are not a Blumenfeld discussed the ability to estab development standards Comm. Di Monda discussed with D. • ctor Blumenfeld the operation and pl Santa Barbara and other cities. ent. ued to the property at 26 Pier ed more as a residential dormitory not provide for such use. Director amendment to permit youth hostels in the the "youth hostel" definition. He said essed in the definition. Director h are a part of Chapter 10. ng of youth hostels in Chmn. Tucker opened e Public Hearing at 10:35 p.m. Mike Rossi, . Homer Street, Manhattan Beach, introduced the hostel manager, Pascel Olivia. 9 P.C. Minutes 2-20-96 PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. TEXT 95-9 -- TEXT AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said text amendment. Director Blumenfeld suggested .the proposed Text Amendment be continued to the next scheduled meeting to allow the entire Commission to be present. Comm. Di Monda referenced page 2, paragraph 1, objecting to the word "historically" which he felt should be narrowed instead of being left wide open. Vice-Chmn. Dettelbach said he thought the word was ambiguous and needed further clarity. Comm. Di Monda said the Commission had previously discussed grandfathering roof signs until the business changed, at which time the sign would be removed. He suggested this concept be included in the text amendment, to which Director Blumenfeld agreed. Vice-Chmn. Dettelbach suggested a memorandum summarizing the Commissioner comments and suggestions for clarity be prepared by Staff and presented at the January 1996 meeting. Vice-Chmn. Dettelbach opened the Public Hearing at 7:22 p.m. No one wished to speak relating to this item, and Vice-Chmn. Dettelbach closed the Public Hearing at 7:22 p.m. MOTION by Comm. Merl, Seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to CONTINUE this item to the January 16, 1996 meeting. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Merl, Vice-Chmn. Dettelbach NOES: None ABSENT: Comm. Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker ABSTAIN: None 8. 95-8 -- TEXT AMENDMENT TO OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT ' THE R-1 Z • AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENT • NEGATIVE DECLARATI S ontinued from November 21, 1995 meetin • a) TO MAKE 0 ' k SPACE REQUIREMENTS ' ERCENTAGE OF LOT SIZE (10%) RATHE ' ' : • N 400 SQUA C . ET MINIMUM, AND b) TO ALLOW ALL OPEN ' I BE ON DECKS ON SMALL LOTS (2100 SQUARE FEET OR Staff Recommended of an Environme : To recommend approval of sa': ext amendment and adoption egative Declaration. Director :. enfeld suggested the proposed Text Amendment be continued to the nex •eduled me- ' g to allow the entire Commission to be present. Page PC Minutes 12-5-95 BACKGROVI40 MATERiAL ®' �� .C. I a 'I lilllil,�,........•u EXHIBIT A : EXAMPLES OF ROOF SIGNS, PROHIBITED BY THE SIGN CODE 'AINMENT SPORT jJ 9 MIME 110TIIIK Ileff11000 SELF ---STORAGE ON I L lip frA 901 •ilk- • - • , . .1 I/.j j.14,..; 1 IF 1. .1 :151 / • / 11.1111M, C —LAuFNL.DuRFYFigaLLFoi!Duls., I tdod 41 . I - I 1..111.1.._ It Ad. .11 EXHIBIT B: EXAMPLES OF SIGNS LOCATED ON PARAPETS EXHIBIT C: EXAMPLES OF SIGNS LOCATED ON ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS PROPOSED SIGN LOCATION SABROSO GRILL BUILDING SABROSO GRYLIL Cit Roof Sign Provisions in Other Cities Permitted? Definition Manhattan Beach NO Any sign located on or extending over the roof of a building and either supported by the roof or by an independent structural form Redondo Beach NO None Torrance YES, subject to the following: • maximum of one • max 1 sq. Ft. For each foot of linear frontage • cannot exceed 10 feet above apparent roof line • supports shall be attractive or screened from view Any sign supported by the roof of a building or placed above the apparent flat roof or eaves of a building as viewed from any elevation Lakewood YES, through design review only Roof Line: Either the uppermost edge of the roof or the top of the parapet, whichever forms the top line of the building silhouette. Where a building has several roof levels, the roof line shall be the one belonging to the portion of building on which the sign is located Roof Sign: Any sign which has a point of attachment to the roof of a building. Architectural projections above any parapet or roof line whose sole function is a background for signs shall be considered a sign structure. A sign on such structure shall be considered a roof sign. Santa Monica NO Any sign erected upon a roof, parapet, or roofmounted equipment structure and extending above a roof, parapet or roofmounted equipment structure of a building. Newport Beach YES By exception procedure through the P.C., only in instances where the location of a business precludes use of a pole, ground, or projecting sign, max 200 sq. Ft., max. 15' above roof A sign erected upon or above a roof of a building or structure Santa Barbara NO Any sign or any part of which is on or over any portion of any roof, eave or parapet of a building or structure Irvine NO Rooftop signs: Signs painted or mounted on roofs Gardena NO Any sign which is supported or constructed wholly upon the roof or over the eaves of a building Norwalk YES In certain C and M zones: • for properties with min. 100 feet of frontage; • max. 150 sq. Ft. Of sign; • max 12 feet above the roof; Any sign erected upon or above the roof of a building, or any sign projecting more than 4 feet above the top wall plate of a building, or a sign that projects more than 4 feet above the fascia in the case of sign on a sloping or shed roof, or a sign affixed to a parapet will that project above the highest point of such wall /.- November 28, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission December 5, 1995 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 95-9 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROHIBITION OF ROOF SIGNS FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED BY STAFF Recommendation To recommend amending the ordinance by adopting attached resolution. Background At the meeting of October 17, 1995, the Commission reviewed the specific language of the proposed text amendment, approved it as written, and directed staff to set the matter for public hearing. For the background discussion, please refer to the previous staff report. Analysis Pursuant to previous proposals, and as tentatively approved by the Commission, the attached resolution proposes the following definition for roof signs and an added definition for "roof line": "Roof line: For the purposes of this Section, the roof line is considered the surface of the roof. For buildings with flat roofs it shall be considered the top of the parapet. Roof Sign: A sign erected above or extending above a roof line of a building or structure. Projections above the roof line which function only as background for a sign shall be considered a sign structure. A sign located on such structure shall be considered a roof sign.". Also in order to allow roof signs in some limited circumstances, Section 13.5-8, Prohibited Signs, sub -section (K) "roof signs" is proposed to be amended as follows: 16 1 "K. Roof Signs. With the following exceptions: 1. Signs located on pre-existing architectural projections extending above a roof line that historically have been used for sign purposes may be permitted. 2. Signs located on projections above the roof line deemed by the Planning Commission to be architectural projections that are part of the architecture of the building and not solely for purposes of sign background may be allowed, subject to approval by the Planning Commission at a public meeting." For further analysis please refer to the attached staff report. CONCUR: Sol Blumenfe Director Community D velopment Department Ken Robertson Associate Planner kr/srsign HEARINGS 9. SS 95-1 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT ROOF SIGNS 1(Cont nued from ORDINANCE 19, REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF 1995 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To set for public hearing. Director Blumenfeld said language had previously been reviewed in connection with the definition of roof signs, with no action taken pertaining to roof sign requirements for architectural projections. Staff presented a new definition for roof signs after completion of review of other cities' definitions. Staff recommended an adjustment to subsection K with respect to prohibited signs. Comm. Dettelbach commented Staff had captured the thoughts previously expressed by the Commission. Chmn. Tucker questioned parapet height minimum and maximum heights, discussing the requirements with Director Blumenfeld. Chmn. Tucker opened the Hearing at 7:30 p.m. No one wished to speak on this subject, and Chmn. Tucker closed the Hearing at 7:30 p.m. Page 1g PC Minutes 10-17-95 Discussion MOTION by Comm. Dettelbach, Seconded by Comm. Merl, to APPROVE Staffs recommendation. AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, Merl, Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: Comm. Di Monda ABSTAIN: None . Page ,. / PC Minutes 10-17-95 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 19, 1995) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 95-1 AND TEXT AMENDMENT October 10, 1995 Regular Meeting of October 17, 1995 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROHIBITION OF ROOF SIGNS FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED BY STAFF Recommendation To set this matter for public hearing if a text amendment is deemed appropriate. Background Staff had previously proposed language for a text amendment to address the issues relating to roof signs, including the issue of existing architectural roof projections like the one at Sabroso's Grill. At the September 19, 1995 meeting, the Commission took immediate action to adopt a policy to interpret the current ordinance as not applicable to pre-existing architectural projections, and to defer the text amendment discussions to allow further research and modifications to the language. At this time staff is seeking direction as to whether a public hearing should again be scheduled for consideration of a text amendment. Roof signs are prohibited, and current defined as follows: "Roof sign is a sign erected upon or above or extending above a roof or parapet of a building or structure." Analysis Staff has obtained current provisions relating to roof signs from the three neighboring cities. These provisions are attached. Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach also do not permit roof signs, Redondo Beach does not have a definition, and Manhattan Beach's is similar to Hermosa Beach's current definition. Torrance defines roof signs, but also allows them subject to certain provisions. Staff also investigated several other sign ordinances relative to roof sign provisions with selected provisions attached. .2-0 9 As a result of this resea, .., and in consideration of the CommissiLcomments at the last meeting staff proposes the following new definition for roof signs and an added definition for "roof line": "Roof line: For the purposes of this Section, the roof line is considered the surface of the roof. For buildings with flat roofs it shall be considered the top of the parapet. Roof Sign: A sign erected above or extending above a roof line of a building or structure. Projections above the roof line which function only as background for a sign shall be considered a sign structure. A sign located on such structure shall be considered a roof sign.". The added definition of "roof line" is proposed to prevent ambiguity as to whether a parapet wall is considered to be above the roof, and thus whether a parapet wall sign is permitted. Both the Commission and Staff noted that parapet wall signs should be permitted. A sign located high on a parapet wall which extends well above a roof could create a concern, however, and could be addressed by a maximum height above the top plate of building. The proposed definition of roof sign is includes language to clarify that projections above the roof line that function only as background for signs shall be considered a sign structure, and thus any sign located thereon is considered a roof sign and not permitted. Also in order to allow roof signs in some limited circumstances, as previously discussed, staff proposes amending, Section 13.5-8, Prohibited Signs, sub -section (K) "roof signs" to read as follows: "K. Roof Signs. With the following exceptions: 1 Signs located on pre-existing architectural projections extending above a roof line that historically have been used for sign purposes may be permitted. 2. Signs located on projections above the roof line deemed by the Planning Commission to be architectural projections that are part of the architecture of the building and not solely for purposes of sign background may be allowed, subject to approval by the Planning Commission at a public meeting." This section will codify the policy statement, and allow Planning Commission discretion on new projects, on a case by case basis, to allow what would otherwise be considered a roof sign, if found to be acceptable for architectural purposes. CONCUR: Sol Blumenf: d, W irector 7zt //1/4 - Ken Robertson Associate Planner Community Y evelopment Department kr/pcsrsign 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 POLICY STATEMENT P.C. 95-2 A POLICY STATEMENT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTERPRETING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGN, AS IT APPLIES TO ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS ON PRE-EXISTING BUILDINGS USED FOR SIGNS IN THE PAST. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public meeting on September 19, 1995 to consider interpretation of what constitutes a roof sign on pre-existing buildings with architectural projections zoning ordinance and made the following Finding: A. The definition of roof signs is not intended to preclude use of existing architectural features that project above the roof, which have been used for signs in the past, as demonstrated through historical photos or other methods. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach California, does hereby adopt the following policy: Signs may be located on pre-existing projections above the roof deemed to be for architectural purposes, and where it can be demonstrated that said projection has been used for sign purposes in the past, upon approval of the Community Development Director. This policy interpretation does not allow exception or circumvention of any other section of the sign ordinance. VOTE: AYES: Comms. Dettelbach,DiMonda,Merl,Perrotti,Chmn.Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Policy Statement P.C. 95-2 is a true and complete record of the actio en by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular me ting Sep i leer , 1995. I , 1,) Peter Tucker, C airman So s me eld Secretary to - ,i- 9 Date h:/pcpsroof Chmn. Tucker stated this decision may be appealed to the City Clerk within 10 days from this date. 9. SS 95-1 -- SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of text amendment Planning Director Schubach said Staff needed interpretation regarding roof sign design. Staff recommended, for flexibility, a clarification be considered stating that roof sign that are prohibited do not include parapet wall signs located above the roof, and that roof sign located on architectural projections above the roof may be approved by the Planning Commission. Comm. Di Monda said he did not want the present or future Planning Commission to be faced with the building of architectural details on buildings which would then become integral parts of the building facade in order for people to get around the sign ordinance. He felt the proposed language would allow that. He suggested recognition of existing buildings' where signing is located on architectural projections above the roof, which would be permitted and written into the ordinance. Comm. Perrotti suggested cataloging of historical buildings with such signs which would be exempted. Director Blumenfeld said there were several historical sign examples in the City, referencing photographs of signs included in the Commission packets. Director Blumenfeld said the issues included (1) what constituted a roof sign, (2) tower signs needed clarification. Comm. Di Monda to recommend the ordinance language stated that no signs will be allowed above the parapet, and no false architectural projections can be constructed for the purpose of putting on a roof sign, and the Planning Commission has the discretion with historic buildings to grant an exception. Mr. Schubach said this would, in essence, leave the language "as is". Comm. Di Monda said it was not the Commission's intent to eliminate signs on historical buildings with architectural features. Chmn. Tucker opened the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m. Rick Hankus, 1150 Hermosa Avenue, owner of Sabroso Grill, said the tower used to have a sign on it. The tower is architecturally a part of the building. Historically, a sign should be allowed. He asked approval of his sign on the tower. Director Blumenfeld said approval could not be given by Staff, given the definition within the sign ordinance. No one else wished to speak, and Chmn. Tucker closed the Public Hearing at 7:55 p.m. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Dettelbach, to MAKE a Finding that the building in which Sabroso Grill is located has historical value, and that that element of the building was originally an area intended as design for signage. Therefore, the Planning Commission APPROVES grandfathering this area to allow Sabroso Grill to continue to use it for signage. Page 23 PC Minutes 9-19-95 AYES: Comms. Dettelbach, Di Monda, Merl, Perrotti, Chmn. Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Mr. Schubach stated Staff would provide a policy statement interpreting the sign ordinance. Comm. Dettelbach felt the words, "integral part" was somewhat subjective, suggesting language be created to grandfather in historical architectural signs and address future construction projects. After discussion among the Commissioners, Director Blumenfeld agreed that Staff would review other cities' ordinances and present them at the next scheduled meeting. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, Seconded by Comm. Dettelbach, to DIRECT Staff to provide language that recognizes the fact that parapet signs are allowed, and to suggest a method to prevent automatic allowance of someone circumventing the ordinance by questionable means by bringing this action to the Planning Commission's attention. No objection, so ordered. H-IEARINGS 10. ' �S 4 (j) -- APPROVAL OF A MURAL IN EXCESS OF THE SIGN AR AT 1242 HHRMOSA AVENUE, FERNANDO'S (continued from August 15, 5 meeting). Staff Recommended.ction' To approve. Planning Director Schubach said this item had been continued beca the applicant did not attend the previous meeting. The applicant not in attendance at this - - ting. He said the sign was existing and needed approval by minute order. . omm. Di Mondtated his concern was that this -was -the- - --- second time a mural had been painted by the . • 'licant ' ho then requested approval. Chmn. Tucker felt it a very "busy" mural. Chmn. Tucker opened the Hearing at 8:0' • m. No one wi hFd to speak on this subject, and Chmn. Tucker closed the Hearing at 8:09 p. MOTION by Comm. Di da, Seconded by Chmn. Tucker, to CO INUE S 4 (j) and to DIRECT Staff to direct applicant not to take any steps towards repainting changing the mural in any way prior to th- ommission completes action on this application. No objects s, so ordered. 11. NR9 -3 -- A NONCONFORMING REMODEL TO ADD A SECOND STORTO EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH NONCONFORMI SIDEYARD AT 616 24TH PLACE. Page 2cf- PC Minutes 9-19-95 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 95-5 September 12, 1995 Regular Meeting of September 19, 1995 PURPOSE: TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROHIBITION OF ROOF SIGNS FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED BY STAFF Recommendation To recommend that the City Council amend the definition of roof signs to clarify that roof signs, which are prohibited, do not include parapet wall signs located above the roof; and, that roof signs located on architectural projections above the roof may be approved by the Planning Commission. Background The proposed text amendment would remove some ambiguities in the sign ordinance, and address a proposal by Sabroso Grill to use an architectural feature of the existing building which projects above for a sign. Since the proposed sign will be installed above the roof it is not permitted by the sign code. Section 13.5-8 of the sign ordinance specifically prohibits roof signs. "Roof sign" is defined as "a sign erected upon or above or extending above a roof or parapet of a building or structure. Analysis Staff proposes the following new definition for roof sign to address the ambiguities in the code: "a sign erected upon, above or extending above a roof line of a building or structure. For the purposes of this definition the top of a parapet wall which is an integral part of the building facade shall be considered the roof line of a building." This change would essentially codify the City's past practice of allowing these types of parapet wall signs, but makes clear that the parapet be part of the building facade not simply an extension for a sign display. In regards to signs that are placed on architectural extensions extending above the roof or parapet walls these would still be considered roof signs (See the previously provided examples in Exhibit C). In some cases, however, these are attractive signs, and do not look like roof signs. They can contribute to and enhance a building's architecture. In other cases the extension may be solely for ZS 9 a sign, and a way to cii...mvent the height limits established for pole signs. In order to allow these signs in some cases, staff is proposing an exception under the listing of roof signs that reads "except for signs located on extensions above the roof line that are determined to be an integral part of the architecture of the building by the Planning Commission". As such the Commission can consider the overall design and appearance of the building, the quality and appearance of the proposed sign, and other factors such as historical attributes of an existing building or the character of the district in which it is located. If needed, the Commission and staff could develop some guidelines for approving these exceptions. CONCUR: of Blume Community Attachments 1. Resolution kr/pcsrsign Id, ) 'rector evelopment Department 74 n Robertson Associate Planner Mr Schubach stated Staff felt this policy necessary due to these sections being ambiguous relating to the definition of construction, which has been broadly interpreted by Staff. Chmn. Dettelbach inv�d public testimony at 8:51 p.m. No one wished to speak,)n Chmn. Dettelbach returned the discussion to the Commission at 8:51 p.m. Discussion Responding to Commission questions, Directory lam nfeld confirmed this policy statement would provide clarification to Staff and the applicants. MOTION by Comm. Di Monda, Sec n ed by Comm. Merl, to ADOPT the Policy Statement 95-1. AYES: Comms. Di-Monda, Merl, Perrotti, Tucker, Chmn. Dettelb chi NOES: None ABSENT: /1Vone ABSTAIN: None 14. SS 95-1 -- SPECIAL STUDY TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING ROOF SIGNS Staff Recommended Actioir To initiate text amendments and set for public hearing. Director Blumenfeld said this item resulted from two projects; one considered this evening and a proposal approved some months ago. The issue involved the definition of "roof sign", which is explicit in the ordinance, but becomes a problem when considering multiple roofs and parapets. Director Blumenfeld then explained the problems experienced by Staff. Chmn. Dettelbach invited public testimony at 9:00 p.m. Jim Lissner, 2715 Eloeste, said he hoped the Commission would consider reviewing temporary banner signs. He suggested: (1) teeth be put in the existing Code for the purpose of enforcement, (2) require a deposit when banners are put up, (3) an expiration date be put on the banner, and (4) clarify the temporary sign banner ordinance to define whether a sign inside large doors, such as service station doors, are banners or interior signs. No one else wished to speak, and Chmn. Dettelbach returned the discussion to the Commission at 9:04 p.m. Discussion Comm. Di Monda said common sense and discretion needed to be applied, noting that signage on the parapets above the first floor was not desired. He felt the Pier Avenue sign band was not an issue unless the sign ordinance made it an issue. He felt scale was the issue, commenting there were a few art -deco Page _z'7 PC Minutes 8-15-95 • buildings in the City which should be encouraged to be saved through historic reasons and valid exceptions. Director Blumenfeld said that some signs were part of the architecture, resulting in the need for clarification. Chmn. Dettelbach said the proposal measured the roof as the top of the parapet, asking what about a one story building and a 30 -foot parapet had been constructed for purposes of obtaining signage. Comm. Di Monda said there was a maximum signage allowed, which would probably not justify building a parapet. Chmn. Dettelbach suggested a language change: instead of "top of a parapet" to "top of an existing parapet wall". The Commission discussed various applications and prohibitions which could be made, including a parapet limitation. Director Blumenfeld said that location was the issue. Limiting the parapet height to existing conditions would address the location issue. Director Blumenfeld proposed Staff make a change to the ordinance to reflect the recommendations made and bring it back a proposed text amendment for the Commission's review. No objections, so ordered. Chmn. Dettelbach requested Staff review other cities ordinances and operations pertaining to this same subject. 15.a. ELE ON OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN Comm. Merl, econded__by Comm. Di Monda, NOMINATED Comm. Tuc , r as Chairman. The APPROVA . vote was unanimous. Comm. Merl, Seconded • Comm. Di Monda, NOMINATED ' mn. Dettelbach as Vice - Chairman. The APPRO vote was unanimous. 15.b. COMMUNITY DEVELOPM T DEPARTME ACTIVITY REPORT OF JUNE, 1995. Receive and File. 15.c. TENTATIVE FUTURE PLAN G COM SION AGENDA Receive and File. 15.d. CITY COUNCIL UTES OF JUNE 29, JULY 11, 25 D 31, 1995 t .1 Receive and •u U S./ : r u Comm. ' i Monda, referencing the old hospital site on Pacific Coast Hwy., said he had - en it adve ised as R-3. He thought it was PDP. Mr. Schubach confirmed it was half SPA and half R-3. e agreed it should be SPA in its entirety. Agreeing with Comm. Di Monda, the Commissioner Page a ' PC Minutes 8-15-95 • August 8, 1995 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission August 15, 1995 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY, SIGNS PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO SIGNS LOCATED ON PARAPETS OR ON ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS INITIATED BY STAFF Recommendation To initiate consideration of the amendments as suggested by staff below , and to set the matter for public hearing. Background The proposed text amendment would remove some ambiguities in the sign ordinance, and address a proposal by Sabroso Grill to use an architectural feature of the existing building which projects above for a sign. Since the proposed sign will be installed above the roof it is not permitted by the sign code. Section 13.5-8 of the sign ordinance specifically prohibits roof signs. "Roof sign" is defined as "a sign erected upon or above or extending above a roof or parapet of a building or structure. The Commission has previously addressed a related issue in 1992 at the request from the Building Director for an interpretation as to when a sign could be placed upon a parapet, expressing concern that parapets would be constructed solely for purposes of signs rather than being integrated in the building facade. Policy Statement 93-2 states that "A parapet wall cannot be constructed solely for the purpose of placing a sign above the roof line. Parapets may be erected only when in conjunction with a remodel of the existing facade." Analysis The definition and policy statementy are ambiguous relative to signs located on parapets, which by definition extend above the roof. While the definition seems to prohibit any signs placed on a parapet, the policy statement implies otherwise. Also, the way its been applied in the past is that signs on parapets have been permitted, as well as signs on architectural features that are above the roofs of the main part of the building. The policy statement was requested to clearly require that parapets be an actual part of , and integrated into, a building's facade and not be allowed solely to hold up a sign. 14, Staff believes that the c Hance should continue to be applied to _ .,hibit certain types of roof signs in which the sign and sign structure are added to the top of a roof or parapet (see exhibit A). However, we also believe that the ordinance should continued to be applied to allow signs on parapets which are part of the building facade or architecture. Examples of these are shown in exhibit B. In effect, the parapet wall is considered part of the building and signs cannot be placed or extend above the apparent roof line which is the top of the parapet wall. To clarify the existing definition of roof sign staff proposes the following: "a sign erected upon, above or extending above a roof line of a building or structure. For the purposes of this definition the top of a parapet wall which is an integral part of the building facade shall be considered the roof line of a building." Assuming the Commission agrees with the above, the question of signs that are placed on architectural extensions which extend above the roof or parapet walls is still not clear (See the examples in Exhibit C). While in some cases these are attractive signs and contribute to a building's architecture, in other cases the extension may be solely for a sign, and a way to circumvent the height limits established for pole signs. As such, whether or not a sign should be allowed depends on some discriminatory judgment on the architecture. The wall extension at the Sabroso Grill building is a good example. Staffwould suggest that the text amendment include an exception for the roof sign prohibition in all zones for signs located upon extensions above the roof line, as defined herein, that are determined to be an integral part of the architecture of the building by the Planning Commission. As such the Commission can consider the overall design and appearance of the building, the quality and appearance of the proposed sign, and other factors, such as historical attributes of the existing building. If needed, the Commission and staff could develop some guidelines for approving such an exception. CONCUR: o : umenf= d, 1 irector Community evelopment Department Attachments 1. Photo Exhibits kr/pcsrsign 30 en Robertson Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION P.C. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW ROOF SIGNS LOCATED ON PROJECTIONS ABOVE THE ROOF IF DETERMINED TO BE ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 19, 1995 to consider amending the sign ordinance with respect to roof signs and to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. Signs located on parapet walls which are an integral part of building facade should not be considered roof signs, which are prohibited. This should be clearly stated in the definition of roof sign; B. Certain roof signs which are located on architectural projections can enhance or contribute to a building's architectural appearance when integrated into the whole structure. These should be considered for possible exception to the roof sign prohibition on a case by case basis subject to Planning Commission approval and determination that the projection is architectural, and not only for the purposes of displaying a sign. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby recommends that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend the definition of "roof sign" as contained in Section 13.5-3(48) to read as follows: "A sign erected upon, above or extending above a roof line of a building or structure. For the purposes of this definition the top of a parapet wall which is an integral part of the building facade shall be considered the roof line of a building 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION 2. Amend Section 13.5-8, Prohibited Signs, sub -section (K) "roof signs" to read as follows: "K. Roof Signs. Except for signs located on extensions above the roof line that are architectural projections determined to be an integral part of the architecture of the building by the Planning Commission". VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 95- is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of September 19, 1995. Alan M. Dettelbach, Chairman Sol Blumenfeld, Secretary Date kr/H:persroof 3_ d 4/mac A April 18, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 23, 1996 Subject: Text Amendment Requiring Protective Coating of Exposed Metal Surfaces and Metal Handrails, Stairrails and Guardrails Recommendation: That the City Council : Introduce the attached ordinance amending Chapter 7, Section 1 of the Building Code as it relates to building regulations for required protective coatings for exposed metal surfaces and metal handrails, guardrails and stairrails. Background: Staff and the Building Board of Appeals have noted that older buildings and some newer building projects have exposed metal railings and metal surfaces that have rusted and may eventually present a safety hazard. Rusted exposed metal handrails and stairrails are a common problem for older residential structures throughout the City due to marine climate. Staff has noted that even recent seismic retro -fit work has been effected when wall bracing and metal struts used for bracing parapets are exposed to the weather. Analysis: In order to eliminate the problem with new construction or renovations, staff is recommending that all exposed metal surfaces, handrails and stairrails be treated with protective coatings to prevent rust and oxidation of metal surfaces. The ordinance would require use of stainless steel, anodized aluminum, epoxy, zinc, galvanized or cadmium coatings and would prohibit use of unprotected metal connectors for new construction or renovation projects. Paint alone, without use of the above listed products, would not be an adequate method to prevent rust and oxidation for metal surfaces. Sol Blumenfd, Director Community evelopment Department Concur: Stephen ' : + rrell, City Manager Attachment: Ordinance 5 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 7, SECTION 1 OF THE BUILDING CODE RELATING TO BUILDING REGULATIONS AND REQUIRING PROTECTIVE COATING OF EXPOSED METAL SURFACES, METAL HANDRAILS, GUARDRAILS AND STAIRRAILS WHEREAS, local climatic conditions tend to oxidize and rust metallic surfaces because of close proximity to the ocean; and WHEREAS, rusted and oxidized metal surfaces become weak and are unable to withstand required lateral and other loads imposed on them; and WHEREAS, weakened, substandard railings and guardrails pose a threat to public safety; and WHEREAS, exposed rusted and oxidized steel members may become unsightly and stain building surfaces or the public right of way, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 7 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding new section 7-1.13 to read as follows: BUILDING CODE Sec. 7-1.13 Metallic Surfaces Require Rust Resistive Treatment Section 509 of said building code is hereby amended by adding section 509.4 to read as follows: 509.4 Protection From Rust and Oxidation. All metallic guardrails described in this section and all metallic handrails and stairrails required by Section 1006.9 of this code and all other exposed exterior metallic surfaces shall be protected against rust or oxidation. This section shall apply to all residential, commercial, industrial or manufacturing uses throughout the city on public and private property. Further, this section shall apply to all metallic railing used for decorative purposes and not mandated by this Code and all screws, nails, nuts, bolts, etc. used for attachment of said metallic material. Adequate protection for the above described metals shall be stainless steel, anodized aluminum, epoxy, zinc, galvanized, or cadmium coating or other methods of protection deemed acceptable by the Building Official. Paint shall not by itself be an acceptable method of protection. EXCEPTIONS: This section does not apply to structures erected in accordance with section 1021 of this code or structures deemed by the Building Official to be temporary in nature. SECTION 2 This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption and shall become operative on SECTION 3 The City Council does hereby designate the City Attorney to prepare a summary of this ordinance to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 36933 (c)(1) in lieu of the full text of said ordinance. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader in the City of Hermosa Beach. SECTION 4 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of official ordinances of said city; shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the city council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1996 PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY ironrail April 2, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 9, 1996 CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE Recommendation: That the City Council approve the revised ordinance through introduction and waiver of full reading. Background: The City Attorney has revised the draft Conflict of Interest ordinance. The ordinance applies to members of the City Council and appointed members of City boards and commissions. The ordinance effective date has been left blank and staff would suggest that the effective date be June 1, 1996 as that is about the time it would be effective through the normal adoption process. The City Council could set a different date if you wish. As directed, you were each provided with a copy of a letter from the City Attorney listing all the cities whose conflict of interest rules were reviewed prior to drafting the ordinance before you. Res • ectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATrommrs AT LAW ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITIONS FOR CITY OFFICIALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Purpose. The proper operation of city government requires that public officials be independent and impartial in their judgment and actions; that government decisions and policy be made in the proper channels of the governmental structure; that public office not be used for personal gain; and that the public have confidence in the integrity of its government and public officials. Although provisions of the Political Reform Act ("the Act") govern the conduct of elected and appointed City officials, and although the City Council, through the adoption of Resolution 94-5707, has adopted a Conflict of Interest Code in compliance with the provisions of the Act, the City Council finds and determines that additional ethical safeguards and guidelines are desirable to prohibit impropriety or the appearance of impropriety in City government. /// /// /// 960314 10649-00001 can 1201347.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDs, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEY AT LAW Section 2: Section 2-2.19 of the Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, California is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: "(a) Any councilmember who is disqualified from voting on a particular matter by reason of a conflict of interest as defined either by the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000 et seq.)("the Act") or by Government Code Section 1090 shall: (1) Disclose the existence of a conflict of interest and the nature of said conflict on the record at the earliest possible time; and (2) Remove himself or herself from the dias at all times during which the matter is under consideration; and (3) Refrain from participating in the discussion as a member of the body and from voting thereon; and (4) Refrain from using his or her official position to influence the decision regarding the matter. Accordingly, the affected councilmember shall not contact any other member of the City Council or any member of any City commission or board, or any /// 960314 10649-00001 cu 1201347.1 - 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTOM1EV6 AT LAW employee or consultant of the City with respect to the matter. (b) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to prevent a councilmember from testifying before a legislative body regarding his or her own personal interests, as defined by the Act and the applicable Regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, or from participating in a matter when his or her participation is legally required, as defined by the Act." Section 3: Article XVII, commencing with Section 2-154, is hereby added to the Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, to read as follows: "Section 2-154. Appointed Officials: Conflict of Interest. The Political Reform Act, Government Code Sections 87100- 91015 and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, including the City of Hermosa Beach's Conflict of Interest Code for Designated Positions adopted by City Council Resolution No. 94- 5707 (collectively referred to herein as "the Act"), Government Code Section 1090 and common law case authority define certain activities by city officials which constitute prohibited conflicts of interest and which preclude participation in or attempts to 960314 10649-00001 cas 1201347.1 - 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 •26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEV'e AT LAW influence certain City decisions. The Act also defines circumstances which require disclosures be made by city officials. The -following requirements are imposed on members of City commissions and boards in addition to the conflict of interest and disclosure provisions of the Act: (a) No member of any City commission or board shall submit any bid or proposal, or otherwise seek or accept any employment, contract, or consulting agreement for financial or other consideration when that member knows or should reasonably know that the prospective employer or source of consideration will require a permit or other approval from the City commission or board on which that member serves. (b) No member of any City commission or board shall use his or her public office for any personal gain, including, without limitation, the use of City stationery, property, vehicles, supplies or other City resources to obtain or promote personal or business interests. (c) Any member of a City commission or board who either has a conflict of interest, as defined by the Act, or who believes that he or she cannot render a fair and impartial decision on a matter due to bias, prejudice or prejudgment, shall: (1) Disclose the existence of a conflict of interest /// 960314 10649-00001 cu 1201347.1 and the nature or said conflict on the record of - 4 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14- 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATra:weve AT LAW the body of which he or she is a member at the earliest possible time; and (2) Remove himself or herself from the dias at all times during which the matter is under consideration; and (3) Refrain from participating in the discussion as a member of the body and from voting thereon; and (4) Refrain from using his or her official position to influence the decision regarding the matter. Accordingly, the member shall not contact any other member of the body of which he or she is a member, or any member of the City Council or any member of any other City commission or committee, or any employee or consultant of the City with respect to the matter. However, nothing in this Section shall be construed to prevent a member from testifying before a legislative body regarding his or her own personal interests, as defined by the Act and the Regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, or from participating in a matter when his or her participation is legally required, as defined by the Act. (d) If, in the course of performing any employment, project, work, contract, or consulting agreement for financial or other 960314 10649-00001caa 1201347.1 - 5 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW consideration, which is in existence as of , a member of any City commission or board determines potential for a conflict of interest exists, that immediately notify in writing the City Manager of that the member shall such potential conflict. The notification shall detail the nature of the conflict, the scope of the member's involvement in the project or transaction at issue, and the general amount of financial or other consideration to be derived by the member from said project or transaction. Said notification shall include a statement as to the affected member's intention to disqualify himself or herself from any deliberation or discussion of the project or transaction at issue. The City the notification to Council, and to the or board. Manager shall immediately transmit a copy of the City Attorney, the members of the City other members of the affected City commission (e) No member of any City commission or board shall solicit or accept any gratuity, employment, contract, or consulting agreement for financial or other consideration from any person or business entity within the twelve (12) months immediately following the date upon which the City commission or board on which that member serves approves a permit or other application requested by the person or business entity, where the member participated in the making of that decision. /// /// /// /// 960314 10649-00001 cas 1201347.1 - 6 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTOANEYe AT LAW Section 2-155. Penalty. - (a) In addition to any other penalty imposed by State law, a member of any City commission or board who violates Section 2-154 of this Code, as the same may be amended from time to time, or any other State or local law regarding conflict of interest may be censured or removed from office by majority vote of the City Council." Section 4: Requirements Supplemental to State Law . This ordinance and its enforcement is intended to be supplemental to and consistent with all applicable State laws. Section 5: Severability. If any section, sub -section, sentence or clause of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub- sections, sentences, clauses, or portion thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1996. ATTEST: CITY CLERK 960314 10649-00001 Cab 1201347.1 MAYOR • 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW _ ,D D� (-)K3 s-� 7-A1 ORDINANCE NO. Q7/// Q!v E gqP/Z-0 1/1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CM/ CALIFORNIA ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITIONS FOR CERTAIN CITY OFFICIALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Purpose. The proper operation of city government requires that city council members and planning commissioners be independent and impartial in their judgment and actions; that government decisions and policy be made in the proper channels of the governmental structure; that public office not be used for personal gain; and that the public have confidence in the integrity of its government and public officials. Although provisions of the Political Reform Act ("the Act") govern the conduct of elected and appointed City officials, and although the City Council, through the adoption of Resolution 94-5707, has adopted a Conflict of Interest Code in compliance with the provisions of the. Act, the City Council finds and determines that additional ethical safeguards and guidelines are desirable to require the disclosure of an time. on actual conflict of interest at the earliest possible Section 2: Section 2-2.19 of the Code frff the City of Hermosa Beach, California is hereby amendedfin its entirety to read as follows: "(a) Any member of the City Council or member of the Planning Commission who may be or is disqualified from voting or taking any action on a particular matter by 960314 10649-00001 cas 1201347.2 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW reason o actual conflict of interest as defined either by the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000 et seq.)("the Act") or by Government Code Section 1090 shall provide notification as set forth in subsection (b) of this Section, and shall disclose the nature of said potential or actual conflict in writing to the City Manager and City Attorney at the earliest possible time and in no event later than two (2) business days from the time that the potential or actual conflict arises. "(b) The notification shall be in writing and shall set forth in reasonable detail and particularity the potential or actual nature of the conflict, the scope of the member's involvement in the project or transaction at issue,d the general amount of financial or other consideration to be derived by the member from said project or transaction Said notification shall include a statement as to the affected member's intention to disqualify himself or herself from any deliberation or discussion of the project or transaction at issue. The City Manager shall immediately transmit a copy of the notification to all members of the City Council and to all other members of any affected City commission or board." Section 3: Requirements Supplemental to State Law . This ordinance and its enforcement is intended to be supplemental to and consistent with all applicable state an laws. 960314'10649-00001 cas 1201347.2 - 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW Section 4: Severability. If any section, sub -section, sentence or clause of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section hereof notwithstanding the remote possibility that any one or more sections, sub -sections, sentences, clauses, or portions thereof might be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1996. ATTEST: CITY CLERK 960314 10649-00001 cas 1201347.2 - 3 - MAYOR ITEM #7 CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF APRIL 9,1996. TO REVIEW THE STAFF REPORT, PLEASE REFER TO ITEM #8 OF THE AGENDA PACKET FROM APRIL 9,1996. A COPY OF THE REPORT IS ALSO AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 6C71 )404b April 18, 1996 Regular Meeting of April 23, 1996 _ DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT COMMISSION REQUESTS 1. LOWER PIER AVENUE STREET CLOSURE DURING AVP WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP WEEKEND (AUGUST 24 AND 25) 2. AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE R.F.P. TO EVENT PROMOTER TO MANAGE STREET CLOSURE EVENT Recommendations To conceptually approve the request for a street closure event during the AVP world championships for Saturday and/or Sunday August 24-25, and to authorize the D.E.C. to issue an R.F.P. for an event promoter. Background At their meeting of April 3, the Downtown Enhancement Commission voted to request a street closure in conjunction with the AVP volleyball event, although no specific details relative to the timing or type of even has been determined. The D.E.C. would sponsor the street festival, and would leave the details to and event promoter/management company, based on their proposals, and the D.E.C.'s input. This is the 10th year the AVP event has been held in Hermosa Beach. Up to 10,000 spectators are expected to attend. The D.E.C. wishes to integrate this large Class III event with the downtown, and specifically Lower Pier Avenue, in order to benefit local merchants. Analysis The proposed street closure will accommodate and take advantage of the spillover of the large crowd expected for this event and is intended to be a one day event, either on Saturday or Sunday, although a two-day event may be possible. While the details have yet to be worked out, the D.E.C. expects to provide a festival atmosphere, with outdoor dining, entertainment, and merchandise displays. Pier Avenue merchants will be granted space in front of their businesses or in front of other shops with mutual agreement. Issues related to the use of lower Pier Avenue are already included in the event contract with AVP which will require cooperation between the promoter of the street festival and the AVP: • The AVP is authorized to use Pier Avenue west of Beach Drive for a staging area. • Access along Pier Avenue for AVP event operators shall be maintained. • Choice of any additional sponsors for the street festival shall be coordinated with AVP event sponsors. In an effort to respond to the issues brought up by the D.E.C. at their joint meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission included language in the contract which specifically encourages AVP to use Pier Avenue west of Hermosa Avenue as part of its event. At this time, the AVP has not included any additional programming for the rest of lower Pier Avenue. Thus, the D.E.C. believes that use of a professional event promoter should be explored. Sol Blume el t , Director Communit Development Department Concur: MO-. (ork* ) 4 Mary C. Rooney Community Resources Director Attachments: AVP Contract Stephe . urrell City Manager c:winword\cc\ccsrclos ASSOCIATION OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on March 12, 1996, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between the ASSOCIATION OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS (AVP) and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to the Association of Volleyball Professionals' Men's U. S. A. Championships on August 23, 24, and 25, 1996. FEES Event fee shall be $9,762 plus set up/tear down fee of $200 per day. The $500 application deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the CITY. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the CITY. ADMISSION FEES The City of Hermosa Beach will be provided with a fee scale chart two weeks prior to the Tournament. AVP agrees to pay the City of. Hermosa Beach $4,000 or 25% of the gross admission revenue, whichever is greater. The AVP agrees to furnish records and make payment of $4,000 to the City of Hermosa Beach two weeks prior to the Tournament and make additional payments, if applicable within two weeks after the tournament. AVP may charge admission for up to 25 percent of stadium seating. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to audit any and all financial records of the AVP specific to priority seating for the Tournament. The City of Hermosa Beach will receive a final copy of the tournament revenue and expenditures in regards to priority seating ticket sales within seven (7) days of the end of the tournament. SECURITY The CITY of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of AVP. AVP shall provide no less than ten security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other tournament staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the CITY'S alcohol ordinance. The CITY of Hermosa Beach shall provide officers for the event as follows: On Friday and Saturday 1 Sergeant and 2 Officers and on Sunday 1 Sergeant and 4 Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by Chief of Police; The CITY shall provide two (2) Fire/Paramedic personnel for the event or as many firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. Cost of officers and fire/paramedic personnel shall be assumed by AVP. CLEAN-UP AVP shall use a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: • The Beach and Strand, from 8th Street to 15th Street • Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the CITY each day of the Tournament. AVP shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: • Beach (impacted area) • Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. AVP shall use Browning-Ferris Industries to provide: One (1) 30 yard roll -off on 13th Street at Beach and six (6) portable toilets that includes one (1) handicap toilet at the base of the Pier on the south side or as determined necessary by CITY staff. AVP shall take necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. AVP shall make arrangements for such bins. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES AVP shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Toumament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If AVP desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be bome by AVP. INSURANCE Ten (10) days prior to the event, AVP shall provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. AVP insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to 2 contribute. Said insurance's shall not be canceled or terminated without at least ten (10) days written notice to the CITY. AVP agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of AVP its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include the Beach, Strand and Pier Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to the Strand in addition to any and all areas occupied or affected by the event. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors; with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required by AVP. CITY staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for postings. CITY shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be _.a the responsibility of AVP. CITY shall permit AVP to display three large replicas of their product. CITY staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. AVP shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY's alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by AVP to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of AVP. PARKING AVP shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs 48 hours in advance of event and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. AVP shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. AVP shall be required to make announcements indicating: 1) where there is free parking; and, 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. AVP shall provide a shuttle bus service from a major satellite point(s) on the outskirts of or outside of Hermosa Beach. AVP shall provide directional signs and advertisement which shall be approved in advance by the CITY. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand, for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may AVP block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. In order to encourage beach events to grow to include a presence in the downtown area, the City welcomes event operators to use the Pier Avenue median (west of Hermosa Avenue to the Strand) for sponsor displays, special events, information, and other promotional purposes. Hermosa Beach merchants will be allowed to display wares and sell food and/or provide outdoor dining in front of their stores. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RIGHTS/RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY reserves the right to use the stadium for civic or recreational events or activities. The CITY shall allow AVP the opportunity to sell official AVP tournament concession items pursuant to certain conditions: • No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted; and, • All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS AVP RESPONSIBILITIES AVP shall provide barricades and cones for use at pre -approved street closures and other areas as deemed necessary by City staff. AVP shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. AVP shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such a Tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with CITY of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Department of Community Resources. AVP shall set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on scheduled days. AT the CITY'S option, AVP is required to display and permit CITY representatives to present a perpetual trophy to Tournament winners following the finals. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MAYOR Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY Date 4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR Date ASSOC. OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS Date ATTEST: CITY CLERK Date 5 /?2.....)#,6- 5205 YI- d21 -et 74&. — //5rd1 Utl The embattled president of a company who had just finished a stormy session with his officers, took it out on his secretary. "Miss Jones, " he demanded, 'Where is my pencil?" "Why, Mr. Smith," the frightened girl replied, "it's behind your ear." - "You know how busy I am!" shouted the man. 'Which ear?' Remember, Secretary's Dag is (-Wednesday, J4pril 24th! AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 23, 1996 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK Julie Oakes Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER J. R. Reviczky John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Robert Benz Stephen R. Burrell John Bowler CITY ATTORNEY Sam Y. Edgerton Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PROCLAMATION: PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK May 1 - 7,1996 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS NONE 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on April 9, 1996. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March 1996 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning - Commission meeting of 4/16/96. (f) Recommendation to approve the Master Plan of Drainage and direct staff to seek outside funding for the implementation of the plan. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 16, 1996. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES a. ORDINANCE NO. 96-1155 - " AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS OR AMENDING CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELETING OUT-OF-DATE MATERIAL FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. For adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated April 15, 1996. 3. ITEMS. REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. TEXT AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF ROOF SIGNS, AND TO ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROHIBITION OF ROOF SIGNS FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 15, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive further reading of ordinance. 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 7 TO ADD A SECTION REQUIRING RUST RESISTANT COATINGS FOR EXTERIOR METALLIC SURFACES. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 18, 1996. (Continued from meeting of March 26, 1996) RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive further reading of ordinance. 3 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST ORDINANCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 2, 1996. (Continued from meeting of April9, 1996) RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive further reading of ordinance. 7. CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 1, 1996. (Continued from meeting of April 9, 1996) RECOMMENDATION: Provide staff direction. 8. FIRE FLOW FEE ORDINANCE REVENUES. Memorandum from Fire Chief Pete Bonano dated April 15, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive further reading of ordinance amending the Fire Flow Fee Ordinance (Ordinance No. 88-932) to authorize the usage of fire flow fee revenues to purchase and/or upgrade fire fighting equipment and vehicles. 9. DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION REQUEST FOR LOWER PIER AVENUE STREET CLOSURE DURING AVP WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP WEEKEND AND AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE R.F.P. TO EVENT PROMOTER TO MANAGE STREET CLOSURE EVENT. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 18, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: To conceptually approve the request and authorize issuance of an R.F.P. for an event promoter. 10. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE / LOWER PIER AVENUE CONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 17, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Authorize City Manager to negotiate a contract with IBI Group for preparation of construction documents and specifications for lower Pier Avenue; 2) Appropriate $152,000 from the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Fund to CIP #96-160; 3) Reject all other proposals; 4) Direct staff to work with downtown property owners in developing an Assessment District; and, 5) Direct staff to return with a plan to install parking meters on upper Pier Avenue and create consistent hours of enforcement for all meters. 4 11. BANNER PROGRAM - CONTRACT FOR FABRICATION, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE. Memorandum from Community _ Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 16, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Approve an award of contract for the services of AAA Flag and Banner Manufacturing Co. in the amount of $25,230 for fabrication and installation; 2) Authorize Mayor to execute and City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; 3) Authorize the Director of Community Development to accept the project as complete on behalf of the City Council, upon completion of the work; 4) Authorize the expenditure of funds upon receipt of contributions from various sponsors currently being collected by the Chamber of Commerce; and, 5) Authorize the Director of Community Development to make minor changes as necessary within budget. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. TELECOMMUNICATIONS, FEE LIMITATIONS (SB1896 - COSTA). Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 17, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council authorize a letter of opposition to SB 1896 in it present form. b. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL AGENDA TOPICS FOR THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 30, 1996. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 18, 1996. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request by Councilmember Benz to direct staff to explore methods of curbing excessive appeals. b. Request by Edgerton to create a sub -committee to meet with officials in Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach and, if necessary, Jane Harman to discuss Century Cable's plans to implement rate increases for cable television service. 5 CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on March 12, 1996. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YS002665 Name of Case: Carrillo v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YCO20233 3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 6 April 17, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council April 23, 1996 Downtown Streetscape Lower Pier Avenue Construction Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate a contract with 181 group for preparation of construction documents and specifications for Lower Pier Avenue. 2. Appropriate $152,000 from the Downtown Enhancement Commission Fund to CIP # 96-160. 3. Reject all other proposals. 4. Direct staff to work with downtown property owners in developing an Assessment District. 5. Direct staff to return with a plan to install parking meters on upper Pier Avenue and create consistent hours of enforcement for all meters. Background: This report is a follow up to City Council direction requesting alternatives to consider before deciding on the design contract for the construction of Lower Pier Avenue. The Pier subcommittee met on April 16, 1996 and discussed several options which can be found in the analysis section of this report. At the regular City Council meeting of January 23, 1996 staff recommended that the contract for the preparation of the construction documents for the Lower Pier Avenue Improvements be awarded to IBI Group, Inc. IBI, as the author of the approved Downtown Implementation Plan, has a clear view of the City's requirements relative to improvements on Lower Pier. As architect on the Pier Renovation Project their firm has the thoroughness and subtlety to provide a clean transition between the two projects. This overall consistency of design thought made 181 the proper choice for preparation of these construction documents. 1 1 0 Analysis: 1. Lower Pier Avenue Construction The original cost of the Lower Pier Avenue improvements was estimated to be $2.1 million by the IBI Group. The total cost of all the downtown improvements is estimated at $6.9 million. In order to create a project that is feasible and buildable, staff has considered phasing the project into 4 separate phases: Phase 1 includes construction of the improvements on Lower Pier Avenue; Phase 2 will follow, improving the intersection of the Lower Pier and Hermosa Avenue; Phase 3 will continue the upper Pier Avenue construction; and the last phase will be the completion of Hermosa Avenue within the downtown enhancement area boundary. Staff, consulting with IBI Group further defined the cost of the improvements to conform to our current budget. The revised total cost of the improvements on Lower Pier Avenue less street furniture and replacing the granite sidewalks with gray concrete is estimated at $1,500,000. The following funds are available at this time: FUNDING STRATEGY - LOWER PIER AVENUE To fund the improvements as money becomes available for each phase. We currently have all the necessary funds available for the first phase of this project. This project will be funded by combination of General Fund, DEC Fund, Sewer Fund, Lighting and Landscaping Fund, and Possible ISTEA Grant Fund. DEC Funds $289,730 Proceeds from the Sale of Alano Property $150,000 Vasek Polak lot swap $ 50,000 Lighting and Landscaping fund $77,000 for the replacement of exist lights Sewer fund for any sewer and storm drain upgrades $107,000 Lighting and Landscaping fund for the modification of the signal at Hermosa and Pier $120,000 ISTEA Fund for pavement $270,000 Total $1,063,730 The remaining $400,000 deficit in required funding is recommended to be collected by the creation of a benefit assessment district. All parcels on Lower Pier Avenue would be expected to participate equally in the assessment. Based on the $400,000 share of the project the businesses would provide the per parcel assessment would be approximately $14,270. The businesses could be given the option of paying this debt back over a specified period of time, perhaps 10 to 30 years. FUNDING STRATEGY - OTHER AREAS Based on previous City Council direction and approvals this project could be funded with revenues generated from the following and improvements could be constructed with the bond proceeds in advance: 1. Additional hours of meter operation 2. Continue encroachment permit fee of $.50 /SF 3. Install parking meters at Upper Pier 4. Parking lot income TOTAL $183,000 $ 47,000 $186,000 $160,000 $576,000 It is recommended to continue the project and hire IBI Group to prepare construction drawings for the project, continue seeking Coastal Commission approval For the entire downtown project. The enclosed schedule provides some target dates for the implementation of the downtown project. The first phase will begin by Preparation of the Lower Pier Avenue construction documents. It will take approximately 5 months to complete these documents and receive all the necessary permits and approvals. Construction of the Lower Pier Avenue could begin as early as October of this year and completed by March of. 1997. With the installation of the parking meters on Upper Pier Avenue and extending the parking meter time limits the generated revenues could be analyzed and a funding plan for the phase 2 (the intersection of Hermosa and Pier Avenue) be submitted to City Council for consideration at that time. Funding: Expenses are as follows: IBI Contract $141,724 Plan Check $ 6,000 Contingency at 3% $ 4,250 Total $151,974 This project is funded by the Downtown Enhancement Commission Fund. The total available fund balance is approximately $423,796. Respectfully submitted: ,6(1AAC. Amy Amir ni Director of Public Works dip41196 Con 4 Steph. Burrell City Manager 3 For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance April 17, 1996 r Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 23, 1996 TELECOMMUNICATIONS, FEE LIMITATIONS (SB1896 - COSTA) Recommendation: That the City Council authorize a letter of opposition to SB 1896 in its present form. Background: This bill would limit the ability of cities to change telecommunication companies for anything beyond the cost of the permit. No mitigation costs for street repairs or use of the right-of-way would be allowed. This could be an important issue for the City as the number of companies offering telecommunication services increases. The primary concerns would be the cost of repairing streets and sidewalks as the several systems install their cable and the loss of potential fee revenue from this business enterprise using public streets. The League of California Cities is urging that all cities oppose this legislation unless it is amended to take into account the legitimate interests of the cities. Respe Ily submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager A number of the Committee members that have recently served in local government voted against Assembly Member Sweeney's previous bill. They include - Richard Rainey (Contra Costa County Sheriff), Brett Granlund (Yucaipa City Council), - Steve Kuykendall (Rancho Palos Verdes City Council), and Bob Margett (Arcadia City Council). The Committee also includes three new members who would benefit from their cities' perspectives on annexation issues: Kevin Murray, Wally Knox, and Brian Setencich. Assemblyman Setencich served on the Fresno City Council before being elected to the Assembly. The remaining members supported our efforts in the past and would appreciate 'your encouragement. Those Assembly Members are: Vice Chairwoman Grace Napolitano (Norwalk City Council), Dick Ackerman (Fullerton City Council), Tom Hannigan (Solano County Supervisor and Fairfield City Council) and the bill's author Mike Sweeney (Hayward City Council). Cities need to be heard on this issue. Cities must contact the members of the Assembly Local Government Committee immediately to pass AB 2846. (See Committee membership after Legislative Activities in this Bulletin.) (Referred to previously in Bulletin #9-1996.) [League Staff: Ernest Silva] 2. Telecommunications, Fee Limitations. [SB 1896 (Costa) - Oppose Unless Amended] Hearing: Monday, May 6, Senate Housing and Land Use Committee SB 1896 is sponsored by the California Taxpayers' Association and is purportedly an attempt to bar localities from charging unjustified fees for permitting telecommunications facilities. However, the measure, as introduced, would have had broad impacts on municipal authority on a wide variety of issues, basically limiting the ability of cities to charge telecommunications companies for anything beyond the cost of processing the piece of paper for a permit. The League has been working with the author and the sponsors to narrow the measure's negative impact to local governments. At the time the Bulletin was going to print, the measure would still significantly limit cities' authority and potentially lead to litigation on a number of fronts. The League is attempting to have the measure amended to restate and clarify existing law regarding permits and the fees that can be charged by cities for permit processing. Further, we are suggesting amendments to ensure the bill does not dilute our current authority to receive mitigation fees and adequate compensation for the use of the public right-of-way. Cities are urged to contact Senators on the Senate Housing and Land Use Committee to oppose this measure unless it is amended to clarify cities' legitimate concerns. Cities are urged to phone and fax the Senate Committee Members to oppose this potentially damaging bill which, as drafted, will substantially disadvantage cities' ability to protect existing municipal authority. #14 4 4/12/96 1 April 18, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April 23, 1996 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL AGENDA TOPICS FOR THE JOINT MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 30, 1996 Recommendation: Provide staff with any topics Council would like added to the agenda for the April 30th meeting. Background: At your March 26, 1996 meeting, Council approved a list of topics for discussion that was provided by the Planning Commission (see attached). As this was a consent calendar item that was not pulled, staff felt it necessary to provide Council the opportunity to provide additional input. Respectfully submitted, Stephen ' . Burrell City Manager 1� 6 March 18, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 26, 1996 Subject: Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the Memorandum Background: On February 27, 1996, the City Council set a meeting date of April 30, 1996 to meet with the Planning Commission to review city planning issues. The Planning Commission is submitting the following list of topics for discussion at the meeting. • Downtown Restaurant/Bar/Retail Mix Issues How many of these uses are desirable? What is the saturation level for these uses? What types of retail uses are being sought? What are optimum operating hours for downtown Restaurants and Bars? What are the issues relative to off -sale alcohol CUP's in the Downtown? • Downtown Parking Issues What kinds of restrictions should be considered to minimize parking impacts upon adjacent residential areas? (In addition to those provided in the Downtown Parking & Circulation Study) • Planning Goals for City What are the overall goals for the City with respect to commercial and residential? What are the goals for Pacific Coast Highway commercial development? l.jaI.4.I h Sol Blumenf; d, 1. irector Community 1 evelopment Department Concur: Stephen R. Bell, City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, MARCH 1996 April 22, 1996 City Council Meeting of April 23, 1996 STATISTICAL SECTION Finance Administration CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FISCAL YEAR TO DATE LAST FISCAL. YR TO DAT.' INVOICES/ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE CASH "RECEIPTS 56 45 1,773 2,986 HECKSISSUED 483 PURCHASE ORDERS 180 DISCOUNTS TAKEN UUT EXEMPTIONS FILED TO DATE 153' 187 $39.1.82 $420.49 (12) 1,099 844 63:5, 461 11,221 15,941 2,292 2,462 .................................................. ............................................. 1 $3,457.38 LANDSCAPE/ST LIGHT 24 Adopted by City 107 REBATES - FY 95/96 Council 10/24:195 .......................::..:......::::. PAYROLL. Full Time Employees Part Time Employees. 131 141 22 65 2,758 $2,520.30 ........................................ 1 c:/actvty2.doc\ITI, Finance Cashier CURRENT MONTH THIS NIONTW LAST FY FISCAL YEAR TO DATE .............. LAST'FISCAL YR TO DATE CITATION PAYMENTS 3,245 3f026. 35,496 V PAYMENTS, NOT YET AVAILABLE206:.: NOT YET AVAILABLE PREVIOUS MONTHS FEB. 291 FEB. 290 L1NQUENT`NOTICES NT: ...............................:.:,::::::::::::::::::. California Out of State 3,860 1,133 31,702 32,816 10,463 -0- -0- -0- 97 DISMISSALS 248' 206 BOATING REVENUE 2,972 4,484 PARKING PERMITS; Driveway Guest Radii.'Passes .......... Contractor ............................ Daily; Annual Preferential Transferable Vehicle ..MTA BUS PASSES ANIMALLICENSES . 3,400_ 2,764 29,944 22,616 4 1 32 152,...: .... 164 ..::.::.::.:.:.:.::::..:.:.....:...... Z492':..:: 11 5 63 0- -0- 37 '1,775 .1,271 2,560. ... 2,022 1,485 4,014 211. 32.. 289 12 2,450 12 7 3,13C 3,745 . 34t 27 37 985 94! TRAPS RENTED 2 2c BUSINESS LICENSES Licenses Issued 504 174 1,187 1,721 Revenue NOT YETAVAILAKE $27,369.90 .. NOT YET }\VAtt.AstE .$316,9.86.71 NOTED: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager Respectfully submitted: ctiuC..— Viki Copeland, Finance Director 2 c:/actvty2.doc\Ill MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director, Community Development Department SUBJECT: Community Development Department Activity Report - March DATE: April 18, 1996 ng ion 4DowntOwn Enhantement Commission The Planning Commission considered Text Amendments regarding determination of legality of non -conforming buildings and moving of buildings onto City lots . A Conditional Use Permit was considered for approval of Patrick Malloy's Steak House. Three Downtown project approval appeals were considered by Council including, Hennessey's Tavern expansion, development of a 17,500 sq. ft. commercial/office building with micro -brewery and development of a new building for California Beach Restaurant building. The DEC recommended approval of a vendor for the Downtown Banner Program with contract award expected in April. A proposal to coordinate a street closure and Downtown events with the AVP event was also considered. Staff has complete review of the draft Downtown Parking and Circulation Study prepared by Korve Engineers and Walker Parking Consultants and draft study recommendations were presented to City Council, the DEC and the Planning Commission in March. Staff will receive a final document in April and will proceed with processing the Downtown Improvement Plan through Coastal Commission and with preparation of amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan based upon the recommendations in the study. The Division has selected EIP as the consultant to prepare an EIR for the proposed Strand Hotel project and presented a contract for City Council approval A draft EIR schedule has been prepared for the hotel project. Staff is continuing with implementation of the City's URM ordinance. Reminder notices to several property owners still not in compliance with the Ordinance have been issued. A draft ordinance has been prepared to require use of rust resistant coatings for all exposed exterior metal railing and structural steel in order to minimize metal deterioration due to marine conditions for Council approval in April. Plan archiving, permit retirement and code enforcement activities continue. Staff is completing review of the County agreement regarding joint development of a multi-level parking structure on Lot "C" in the downtown and proceeding with negotiations with the hotel developer relative to a parking lease agreement. An interim lease agreement for Downtown lots is also being prepared. :.......:::::::::.:::::...:......:::::::...............:..::.:::::::::...::::::::::..:::.::::::::.......::......::::::.,.:.:....:::::::.....:::.:.:.::.,::.::::::::::::.:::::::::.:::::..:....:.:::::... > o nmunity Development'Admi int :ti t The City Hall first floor office remodel project is proceeding with selection of low bidders, Westcon as the General Contractor and the Wall Center and Herman Miller for modular walls and workstations. The City Council awarded contract and work is scheduled to commence in June. 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTBUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION MARCH 1996 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT NUMBER OF PERMITSMONTH CURRENT THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING 22 41 291 209 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 11 16 139 131 ELECTRIC 9 • 13 103 97 PLAN CHECK 12 23 133 120 SEWER USE 0 3 5 7 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 38 19 194 180 COMM. INSPECTIONS- - 20 9 181 PARKS & RECREATION 0 1 2 2 IN LIEU PARKING & REC 0 0 2 0 BOARD OF APPEALS 1 1 2 5 SIGN REVIEW 3 4 28 33 FIRE FLOW FEES 2 7 31 23 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 2 6 16 22 TOTALS 100 154 1010 PERMIT FEES CURRENT MONTH .......... THIS MQNTH •LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING $6,768.81 $10,441.24 $84,755.60 $43,352.71 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 548.60 1,547.15 9,704.55 10,268.55 ELECTRIC 912.45 2,088 6,943.65 10,131.50 PLAN CHECK 7,130.16 6,641.24 63,093.39 30,778.36 SEWER USE 0 3,234.05 4,095.07 8,418.81 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 1,653 826.50 8,435.50 7,789 COMM. INSPECTIONS - 870 391.50 7,973.50 PARKS & RECREATION 0 3,500 7,000 7,000 IN LIEU PARKING & REC. 0 0 6,896 0 BOARD OF APPEALS 162.75 162.75 325.50 813.75 SIGN REVIEW 260.25 347 2,367.75 2,732.50 FIRE FLOW FEES 655.50 4,125 16,778.50 11,105.50 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 0 0 0 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 65 227.50 520 877.50 TOTALS $18,156.52 Z. , .0 1 .y .-r .,...... t CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT / BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF MARCH, 1996 TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING UNITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1 101 NEW SINGLE DWELLINGS 2 102 NEW SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED 3 103 NEW TWO FAMILY BUILDING 4 104 NEW 3 OR 4 FAMILY BUILDING 5 105 NEW 5 OR MORE FAMILY BUILDING 6 213 NEW HOTEUMOTEL 7 214 NEW OTHER NON HOUSEKEEPING 8 318 NEW AMUSEMENT & RECREATION 9 319 NEW CHURCH/OTHER 10 320 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 11 321 NEW PARKING GARAGE (PUBLIC) 12 322 NEW SERVICE SFR/REPAIR GARAGE 13 323 NEW HOSPITAUOTHER INSTITUTIONAL 14 324 NEW OFFICE/BANK 15 325, NEW PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITY BLDG. 16 326 NEW SCHOOUOTHER EDUCATIONAL 17 327 NEW STORE/OTHER MERCH BLDG. 18 328 NEW OTHER NON RESIDENTIAL BLDG. 19 329 NEW STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BLDG. 20 434 ADD/ALTER DWELLING/POOL 16 $206,674.06 21 437• ADD/ALTER NON RESIDENTIAL 5 $202,780 22 438,. RESIDENTIAL GARAGES/CARPORTS 23 645, DEMOLITION -SFR 24 646 DEMO 2 SFR 25 647 DEMO 3-4 SFR 26 648 DEMO 5+ BLDG. 27 649 DEMO ALL OTHER BLDG. spa, demo TOTAL PERMITS: 21 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: $409,454.06 Total Dwelling Units Permitted. 0 Total Dwelling Units Demolished- 0 Net Change. 0 Net Dwelling Unit Change FY 95-96• 0 Cumulative Dwelling Unit Total- 0 (includes Permits Issued) April 15, 1996 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL April 23, 1996 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION MARCH, 1996 STAFF REPORT PREPARED SUBJECT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE -APPEAL / RECONSIDERATION 0 0 3 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 1 0 5 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) 1 1 4 9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 0 1 6 9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 0 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION 0 0 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 0 FINAL MAP 0 0 2 1 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 0 1 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 0 0 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 0 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 0 0 6 2 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 1 1 2 PARKING PLAN 0 0 1 2 SPECIAL STUDY 0 3 5 19 SUBDIVISION 0 0 0 0 TEXT AMENDMENT 2 3 24 18 TRANSIT 0 0 4 1 VARIANCE 0 0 2 3 ZONE CHANGE 1 1 2 1 MISCELLANEOUS 9 5 44 38 TOTAL REPORT PREPARED 14 15 110 110 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP PASSENGERS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY' TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE HERMOSA BEACH 812 743 7656 6433 REDONDO BEACH 5108 4757 47870 45072 SATELLITE 474 509 3950 3795 The following Activities were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council / Initiated by 1. Appeal of Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit amendment to allow on -sale alcohol in conjunction with a restaurant at 50(a) Pier Avenue, Patrick Malloy's Steak House. 2. General Plan Circulation Element amendment to reclassify Pier Avenue from arterial to collector's street. (Downtown Implementation Plan) / Downtown Enhancement Commission 3. Text Amendment to relocate Municipal Code Sections 7-1.7, 7-1.8 & Article IX to the Zoning Ordinance. / Staff 4. Text amendment to add youth hostel to C-2 permitted use list. CONCUR: Sol Blume fel • , Director Community Development Department NOTED: Stephen R. B City Manager ell Respectfully sulwmitted, -Ying Ting Administrative Aide f:\b95\trans\misc\activity MEMORANDUM TO: - Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pete Bonano, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Activity Report - March DATE: 04/16/96 Operations The Fire Department responded to four residential, two commercial, and one vehicle fire during the month of March. The vehicle fire was the result of a arsonist who because of a dispute decided to burn the vehicle. Engineer Crawford, who is one of the Departments arson investigators, found evidence of a flammable liquid which was used to torch the vehicle. The evidence has been sent on to the L.A. Sheriff's Crime lab for finger prints. The investigation is currently on-going in an attempt to gather enough evidence to arrest the suspect. This arson fire had serious potential of spreading due to the fact the vehicle was located in a parking structure under a large apartment complex. Disaster Preparedness Work is continuing on the City's Emergency Operations Center and bringing Hermosa Beach into compliance with the Standardized Emergency Management (SEMS) mandates of the State. As Council is aware from the training on April 3rd, the City must have fully implemented the SEMS requirements by December 31, 1996 to be eligible for reimbursement of personnel costs during a disaster. Also a new Multi Hazard Functional Plan is being worked on updating the City's current plan to meet the SEMS requirements. The new plan will be distributed in May. HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1996 MARCH 1996 FIREBTATISTICS' THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE TOTAL CALLS 99 62 256 228 FALSE ALARMS 4 11 12 25 MUTUAL AID 0 1 1 2 PARAMEDIC ASSISTS 72 37 166 101 RESIDENCE FIRE 4 2 23 14 COMMERCIAL FIRE 2 1 12 7 VEHICLE FIRE 1 1 1 3 HAZARDOUS MILS. 5 4 9 15 OTHER 11 5 32 61 ESTIMATED FIRE LOSS 2,200 4,000 38,850 6,425 PARAMEDIC STATISTICS TOTAL RESPONSES 79 58 194 162 NO PATIENT/AID 11 6 17 10 MEDICAL 37 30 103 84 TRAUMA 31 22 75 78 AUTO ACCIDENT 16 7 26 27 ASSAULT 4 7 24 13 JAIL CALL 2 0 10 7 HOSPITAL CONTACTS 42 16 91 53 TRAUMA CENTER 2 2 6 0 ...................... INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE COMMERCIAL 65 5 118 62 ASSEMBLY 1 0 2 1 INSTITUTIONS 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 0 1 APARTMENTS 6 0 52 96 (RE -INSPECTIONS) COMMERCIAL 10 11 40 86 ASSEMBLY 2 0 0 1 INSTITUTIONS 0 0 0 1 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 0 0 APARTMENTS 17 46 59 ' 83 •.1 ....................... AMBULANCE TRANSPORTS THIS MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE AMOUNT BILLED THIS MONTH AMOUNT BILLED F/Y TO DATE RESIDENTIAL 29 191 $6,670. $43,930. NON-RESIDENTIAL 18 130 $8,280. $59,800. TOTAL 47 321 $14,950. $103,730. jc/revmont l pt Noted: Respectfully Submitted: STEVE BURREL i' MANAGER PETE BONANO, FIRE CHIEF HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1996 March POLICE OFFENSES REPORTED PERSONS ARRESTED Adults This Month This Month One Year Ago Year to Date Last Year To Date Murder 0 0 0 1 Rape 0 0 0 0 Robbery 2 3 6 5 Assault 13 • 16 30 33 Burglary (Total) 29 18 77 55 (Vehicle) 7 9 13 29 (Residential) 17 6 54 21 (Commercial) 5 3 10 5 Larceny 32 44 95 125 Motor Vehicle Theft 12 7 30 27 DUI 15 18 33 75 All Other Offenses 227 260 644 782 Disturbance Calls 261 200 670 509 PERSONS ARRESTED Adults 58 53 180 207 Juveniles 11 1 17 8 Criminal Citations 63 99 168 296 Bicycle/Skateboard Cites 1 1 2 1 TRAFFIC REPORT ACCIDENTS Fatal 1 0 1 1 Injury 10 7 17 26 Property Damage Only 17 20 46 71 CITATIONS Traffic 214 245 645 830 Parking 3 9 14 33 POLICE CALLS FOR SERVICE 'Total Calls 1 18901 19021 41061 5848 Pg 1 of 2 PARKING ENFORCEMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1996 March This Month This Month One Year Ago Year to Date Last Year To Date Parking citations issued 5308 4198 13147 approx 11528 Vehicle impounds 6 43 38 55 Vehicle boots 0 6 1 47 PARKING ENFORCEMENT CALLS FOR SERVICE Total Pkg Calls 1 1391 1431 4101 400 ANIMAL CONTROL A/C citations issued I 121 131 361 60 Total of Animal Pick ups 39 46 106 139 of these # returned to owner 9 24 21 50 # taken to shelter 16 4 28 51 # Injured, taken to Vet 1 2 2 3 # Deceased 13 16 55 55 # returned to wild 0 0 ANIMAL CONTROL CALLS FOR SERVICE Total AC Calls 1 651 961 1961 257 * indicates information not collected prior to 4/95 Steve = urrell, City Manager Resp Submitted,4k202., Val Straser Chief of Police Pg 2 of 2 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 11, 1996 Regular Meeting of April 23, 1996 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - MARCH 1996 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager, this includes engineering and management of Capital Improvements Projects. PERMITS ISSUED Type of Permit Current Month 95 - 96 To Date Last FY Month 94 - 95 To Date Sewer Demolition 0 5 0 2 Sewer Lateral 0 5 0 0 Street Excavation 2 25 4 18 Utility Companies Only 2 68 24 53 Dumpster/Misc. 6 36 11 22 Banner Permits 2 15 1 10 ENGINEERING The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 92-141 Hermosa Ave. Sewer and Street Rehabilitation. CIP 93-145 Utility Undergrounding. CIP 94-160 Downtown Improvement Project. CIP 93-302 NPDES Storm Water Management. 1 (.4 CIP 92-408 • Sanitary Sewer Improvement City-wide. • Loma Drive Sewer and Street Rehabilitation • Ingleside Drive Sewer and Street Rehabilitation CIP 95-620 CIP 95-622 Hermosa Beach Pier Renovation. City Hall ADA Requirements. MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: • Parks/Medians • Street Maintenance/Building Maintenance • Sewers/Storm Drains • Street Lighting • Traffic Safety • Equipment Service Parks/Medians Division: Sign and tag all reclaimed and potable water valves. Repair damage to South Park and repair park furniture. Irrigation repairs at Valley and South Parks; and at City Hall. Ongoing median maintenance. Street Maintenance/Building Maintenance Division: Paint restrooms at the pier and repair the door. Paint bus benches. Change marquee at Community Center. Repair meter poles. Make hot asphalt repairs City-wide. Build shelves at City Yard garage. Replace Clark Stadium door. Survey beach volleyball courts. Assist in graffiti removal on Hermosa Avenue at 3rd and 4th Streets. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Open and maintain outfalls on the beach. Rod sewers. Install new drains at Noble Park. Repair plumbing in the Community Center. Repair 4th and Hermosa Avenue storm drain. Open manhole at 35th and Manhattan Ave. Install new drain at City Yard. Street Lighting Division: Repair lights at Bicentennial Park. Survey and repair street lighting City-wide. Put in new lights at City Hall. Repair parking lot lights. Repair City Hall and Police Department electric outlets. Install and remove banners. Assist with reclaimed water signage. Traffic Safety Division: Finish Hermosa Avenue signage; and move and replace meter poles. Sign maintenance City-wide. Install signs at South Park. Install signs and meters at 2nd and Hermosa Avenue. Clean up bays at City Yard. Assist sewer crew. Remove 3-M legend at 24th Street. Assist with curb painting. Attend traffic safety seminar. Equipment Service Division: Ongoing vehicle and equipment repairs. All Divisions: Training and certification for fork lift driving. Graffiti Removal: FY 94-95 JULY 1994 AUGUST 1994 SEPTEMBER 1994 OCTOBER 1994 NOVEMBER 1994 DECEMBER 1994 JANUARY 1995 FEBRUARY 1995 MARCH 1995 APRIL 1995 MAY 1995 JUNE 1995 YTD TOTAL: Respectfully submitted: 3.50 Hours 17.00 Hours 2.00 Hours 12.50 Hours 0 0 0 11.00 Hours 0 5.00 Hours 20.00 Hours 6.50 Hours Cum Amy Amirani Director of Public Works 77.50 Hours 3 FY 95-96 JULY 1995 AUGUST 1995 SEPTEMBER 1995 OCTOBER 1995 NOVEMBER 1995 DECEMBER 1995 JANUARY 1996 FEBRUARY 1996 MARCH 1996 Noted: 0.50 Hour 27.50 Hours 12.00 Hours 21.00 Hours 42.00 Hours 3.00 Hours 37.00 Hours 9.25 Hours 18.00 Hours YTD TOTAL: 170.25 Hours Ste hal� . Burrell p City Manager bc/a/PWccitem/moact April 10, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 23, 1996 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT - MARCH 1996 STATISTICS Worker Comp Claims CURRENT THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY MONTH LAST YEAR DATE TO DATE Claims opened 3 3 40 34 Claims closed 2 0 32 31 Total open 70 72 Current Employee 33 26 Active Cases 4 5 Lost time (hours) Safety Non -Safety Liability Claims 536 324 1952 1525 9 180 141 1390 Claims opened 2 6 22 38 Claims closed 3 1 42 29 Total open 19 33 Employee -Involved Vehicle Accidents Safety 0 0 2 4 Non -safety Employee Turnover Safety Non -safety 0 0 2 3 0 1 1 7 0 0 Respectfully submitted, Not /1Zt?eza Robert A. Blackwood, Director Personnel & Risk Management ACT2 Stephen R. Burrell City Manager April 16, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of April23, 1996 Department of Community Resources Activity Report for March 1996 1 The Department of Community Resources has provided the Community with the following activities for the month of March. RECREATION PROGRAMMING Recreation Classes Begin. The Spring 1996 recreation classes began the week of February 26. Classes for youth and adults continue to be popular. Some of the more popular adult classes include Beach Volleyball, Ballroom & Latin Dance, Hatha Yoga and Golf. The most popular youth classes include Soccer, Rhythmic Gymnastics, Dazzlers and Piano. Some of our new youth classes that are going well are Karate/Kickboxing, Roller Hockey and Ballet/Tap. Our new adult classes, Women's Self -Defense and Country Dancing, are also receiving positive responses. Whale Watching Excursion. Saturday, March 9, 1996. The trip sold out and fun was had by all. The afternoon cruise was beautiful and several pods of whales made an appearance. Non -School Day. Friday, March 15, 1996. We took a total of 23 kids to the Los Angeles Zoo and it was a big hit. The cost was $10 per child and parent response to the program was very positive. Special Events St. Patrick's Day Weekend Parade. An off season parade and festival that attracted around 3,000 spectators, made up mostly of local South Bay families. The parade began at 11:00 a.m., starting at Pier and Valley Drive, and lasted approximately one (1) hour. After the parade, the crowd spent the day experiencing authentic Irish entertainment plus crafts and food at the festival. This year a round trip for two (2) to Ireland was raffled off. The vendors for the festival consisted of South Bay artists, businesses and organizations. Roller Hockey Clinic. Saturday, March 30, 1996. This clinic was sponsored by Motiv Sports and ran from 10:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. It provided children ages 8 - 14 with three (3) hours of intense training in skating skills, passing, shooting and puck control. After the clinic, games were played and awards were given. Motiv Sports passed out T-shirts, skate equipment and pucks. The 15 kids that participated had a great time and parents wanted to know when we would be hosting another one. Facility 3/96 User Hours 3/95 User Hours Field 233 240 Theatre 110 84 Clark 269 224 Gym 351 284 Room 8 136 96 Room 10 95 136 Room 12 104 78 DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This Month FY Last Fy Month Last Fy To Date To Date $31,308 $31,810 $316,382 $280,321 Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 75% of the fiscal year is $316,382 or 71% of the projected figure of $446,000. Community Resources Department general fund expenditure for 75% of the fiscal year is (estimated) $346,873 or 74% of the budget FY 1995-96 appropriation of $467,223. Concur: Mary ney, Director Co unity Resources Stephen R. B i r City Manager Respectfully Submitted, 41 Cf20 Je r Clark Recreation Specialist Thousands watched as 5K 6R 3 -aS-`a c„ Hermosa wore green 3-1-`i(-0 The Street Beat High Steppers from Carson, which included dancers and drum- mers, were one of the most popular entries in Saturday's St. Patrick's Day Parade. Councilmember Robert Benz rode in a Assemblywoman Debra Bowen waved to classic car with Patty Spiritus of the the crowd of thousands while her bored Hamilton Gregg Brewworks. dog yawned. Hermosa Beach league forming The city of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources is now taking team registrations for a 6 -foot -4 and shorter indoor adult basketball Icaguc. The league will start April 27 and run for 12 weeks, including playoffs. There will be a Saturday and a Sunday league, with all games played at the Community Center gym, 710 Pier Ave. The cost of the league is $125 per team with a $50 refundable forfcit fee at the end of the season, plus a $2 charge for every player who is not a Hermosa Beach resi- dent. There is a $25 fee per team per game for officials and scorekeepers. Awards will be given to first -place teams in each league. Pick up a roster at the Community Center. For more informa- tion, call 318-0280. DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL REPORT OF ACTIVITIES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1996 AMOUNT OF SERVICE YEAR TO LAST YEAR SERVICE PROVIDED THIS MONTH DATE TO DATE SERVICE REQUEST 0 0 0 FIELD HOURS* 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 DOG IMPOUNDED 3 31 30 CAT IMPOUNDED 1 36 54 OTHER IMPOUNDED 2 39 50 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 PRIVATE VETERINARIAN CARE 0 0 0 OBSERVATION 0 0 2 DEAD ANIMAL 32 119 76 HUMANE INVESTIGATIONS 0 0 0 COURT APPEARANCES (hours) 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 ANIMALS PLACED IN NEW HOMES 1 11 11 ANIMALS RETURNED TO OWNERS 1 10 12 LICENSED SOLD 0 0 0 DOG LICENSE CANVASSING 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 *Includes humane education hours DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL REPORT OF ACTIVITIES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MONTH OF MARCH, 1996 AMOUNT OF SERVICE YEAR TO LAST YEAR SERVICE PROVIDED THIS MONTH DATE TO DATE SERVICE REQUEST 0 0 0 FIELD HOURS* 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 DOG IMPOUNDED 4 35 32 CAT IMPOUNDED 14 50 55 OTHER IMPOUNDED 2 41 52 CITATIONS ISSUED 0 0 0 PRIVATE VETERINARIAN CARE 0 0 0 OBSERVATION 0 0 2 DEAD ANIMAL 6 125 76 HUMANE INVESTIGATIONS 0 0 0 COURT APPEARANCES (hours) 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 ANIMALS PLACED IN NEW HOMES 5 16 11 ANIMALS RETURNED TO OWNERS 2 12 12 LICENSED SOLD 0 0 0 DOG LICENSE CANVASSING 0000:00 00000:00 00000:00 *Includes humane education hours at, N4. • i A h•1 I}rte pp, 1 I�YL.' Iyy4y'Tt:wi:' C -.: ftL • e' t' 741a2. ... aRwRi^ /� b t4t• 4,11 44. • • rterittlz. 0. -'• c a. Y. fr'nisb Tt • a wart \TGT -IOC • h:.c. IC CO, CITY RST L "'Ater /; / / ..:...»a Q 5o=: 1 I2 cfs / it _',4CE� /l / / r // / Q 50 = 75 cfs r' 14 ti AW tna e�A. r / / r E r 0 50 = 33 cfs ri 1 NGLLS \ '‘�11 ;� 11 1'i3 1 1'I i , a NHt CYi•NO N'IC. r • y``4 -"tt" / / /' I /i' XPi I 4I -2/I/( so = 15 cfs /dE' / j r V "4' L- ///o� / a 1/ / I .1 ' r+ \ t",.\ ' �1 1{ j c + R 1 //� I I t +0 11 0 Id = 21 \ bfs \\ \ • + I 1I Yit II I , 11 1 PA. if pc P<R[:1 F HERRROSA = 1 1 cfs C0 -0t4 AvL. mit Lr PEE! ;\,' pN'j0E c, HOOT` i wC' St. , r I , . II I I --- of 4- -•--- B'N2IN ;1 ST. 1 50 = 158 cfs / 50= 155 cfs? /.* / r/ 1' 0 01. ti 50 —f79 cf-s -Q In =,233 cfs 1• 27 AF DETENTION BASIN I/ = 34 /cfs 33E'r.. _ _/1 // _ I0 I I 0«„ - llmcfs 1 i \ ; j \� it 45 . /1/ /ji 1 fp: ti ,ttor,..; Ii // 05O r/ 69 cfs e.t.a I' SACH Ifs CEILITIIIES 11 cfs Q 25 AVE. 5I cfs Q25= 8 cfs 0 s0= 225 cfs 50 _= 85 cfs ..s I N;.r . CrQ vA ' AK. 11 1 \L-- 60' 36 10 AF DETENT ION BASIN Q so= I 0 so= 147 Cf s • 46 _ 11 I Kuala. I PONNIE PRAT CASPANA CC E AN ST. 1 0= 1 1 cfs ,4 c 50= 253 bfs 48 501„= 473 cfs 500,,t= 8 I Cf s v' \c 050 = 320 cfs 39 cfs — !1°' t't._--pl AN•IATT 5 +� c 8 c 1'� \ +1 ---:::-1------ 2 +1 l J� 1 t:, \------ --a rr3--c-rt. \,`� ' GI \0I 57 a Ne :�_\ t--- :„-5 r cfs Ti 50 = 8 cfs 10 • 5 o cfs • 30 n Li 1725 25 22 cfs 1,1 kr Lthl So st 34 cfs II TI MO% TE C.1RG.A DAT/S50 ST. Q 10-50= 28 cfs BEANIE BRAT Q 25 B •, i� , 0 25 51 cfs'?f }0 25 i \ �/ /4 25 = 30 cfs f 50= e1 i Q 50 = 39 cfs VA emir ST CONAEtt U&NA'IAM AVE OALA 025 = 21 CtS1 111111111111151111 al al. IP • = 75 cfs Fa:Ir I: CC .T .-:..L. 1-i I' II ij APC✓WC i.5•41 it DR• Of TR• 050= 8 cfs Ed .'VC Ay/ FIPOSPE rT avE. it I \i I at. 1 33 1 of S '1 025 = 6 Icfs i rr „...1 II 1 � 1 L_ Lf d 24_ -- _ 7—Q-zS- =7 18 urs 1 i J11 __i ' k 0 25== I I' 6 cfs III I © 1 I If I Q 25= !;73 cfs .44 P, 1N: 0 50 37 , Cf s OCEAr vI[. AVC. 5 5= 70 cfs L— J 1 36 0 50= 245 c ais 38 cfs 1 II 050 4 IRO • 111111 50= 320 cfs 07 rz Yr 36 cf 24 • cfs PTAIOP sve 2 = 429 C‘N.4 7 cfs cfs • LEGEND EXISTING PIPE TO BE REPLACED LOCATIONS OF SUMPS & DEFICIENCIES ---4: PROPOSED OUTLET LOCATION —ei: EXISTING OUTLET LOCATION 27 AF DETENTION BAS IN 50 =123 cfs 1 TIID CO ticmArlAre CD 10 24111 0.46 Vie r--71 24 / orN 360 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN PLATE El CONSULTIN ENGINEER 101 PACIFICA. SUITE 150 IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92718 (714) 753-7333 (714) 753-7320i FAX CITY Of HERMOSA BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN FACILITIES MAP DATE. FERFtUARY 1 PPS •