HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/08/96ACTION SHEET
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 8, 1996 - 7:10 p.m.
Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session
CALL TO ORDER: 7:13pm
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Robin Bennett
ROLL CALL: OAKES, REVICZKY, BOWLER, EDGERTON
BENZ (ARRIVED AT 7:18PM)
MAYOR'S COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS:
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ROUND -UP ON 10/26/96, 9AM TO 3PM,
AT'HUGHES 'ELECTRO -DYNAMICS, 310.0 W LOMITA BDV, TOR RANO
ALM I
PROCLAMATIONS:
HEALTH CHOICE AMERICAN HEART WALK
OCTOBER 19, 1996
SAM - 11AM
MAIN PARKING LOT - unix CO. OF MARY HOSPITAL
4101 TORRANCE BLVD.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
(a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
(c) COUNCIL COMMENTS
NONE
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
(a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes:
1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on September 18, 1996;
2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on September 24, 1996.
(b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of
certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer.
PULLED BY RB
RB QUESTIONED WORKER'S COMP PAYMENT #8244.
JO QUESTIONED LANDSCAPE WEST PAYMENT #8167.
(RB/JO. MOTION TO RATIFY. VOTE: 5-0
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to authorize the Director of Public Works to award a
contract in the amount of $5,275.00 to West Roofing for roofing repairs and
to make minor adjustments within the approved budget. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated September 24, 1996.
(e) Recommendation to deny the following claims and refer to the City's
Liability Claims Administrator. Memorandum from Risk Manager
Robert Blackwood dated September 25, 1996.
Claimant: Miller, Holly
Date of Loss: 4/27/96
Date Filed: 9/24/96
Claimant: Stern, Jillian
Date of Loss: 3/31/96
Date Filed: 9/30/96
(f) Recommendation to appropriate $3,869.00 from the Fire Flow Fund for the
purchase of ten breathing apparatus bottles. Memorandum from Fire Chief
Pete Bonano dated September 30, 1996.
(g)
Recommendation to award contract to Empire Pipe Cleaning and
Equipment, Inc. for an amount of $234,570 for three years of sanitary sewer
system maintenance and video inspection and authorize the Director of
2
Public Works to make minor changes within the budget. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated October 2, 1996.
JB/JR MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON BALANCE
OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS. VOTE: 5-0
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES
a. ORDINANCE NO. 96-1163 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, SECTION 17.04.040, MODIFYING THE
DEFINITION AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING BUILDING
HEIGHT AND GRADE." For adoption. Memorandum from City
Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 3, 1996.
JR/JB MOTION TO ADOPT. VOTE: 5-0
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR
SEPARATE DISCUSSION.
* Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M.
4. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVAL, WITH MODIFICATIONS, OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A NEW 6,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH
AUTO REPAIR AND OFFICE USES AND ADOPTION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 807 - 21ST
STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld
dated October 1, 1996.
JBIRB MOTION DIRECT STAFF TO RETURN WITH A RESOLUTION TO
SUSTAIN TM DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE
THE REQUESTED PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED IN THE
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION WITH THE FOLLOWING
AMENDMENTS:
1, MODIFY CONDITION 413 TO READ, "ALL: AUTO. REPAIR MUST BE
CONDUCTED IN THE 5 SERVICE BAYS IN' THE BUILDING AS PER THE
APPROVED PLANS"
2, 'INCLUDE A "KEEP CLEAR" ZONE IN FRONT OF DRIVEWAY
3, POST STOP SIGNS AT EXITS ON RAMPS
4 MODIFY CONDITION 43 TO STATE THAT THE SIDEWALK SHALL NOT
BE BLOCKED AT ANY TIME.
VOTE: 4-1(SE-NO)
JR/J0 MOTION FOR STAFF TO RETURN WITH REPORTREOARDING TIL
CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK ON SOUTH SIDE OF 21ST ST. BETWEEN
PCH AND PROSPECT. VOTE 5-0
313/312 STAFF' RETURN WITH TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE
TO ESTABLISH PARKING REQUIREMENTS AOR AUTO REPAIR AND
SERVICE STATION AND TO DEAL WITH THE ISSUE OF REQUIRED
PARKING IN SERVICE BAYS. VOTE: 4-1 (RB -NO)
5. ADOPTION OF THE CITY CODE - RECODIFIED VERSION, WHICH
RE -FORMATS AND RE -NUMBERS THE EXISTING CODE BUT
MAKES NO CHANGES TO ITS SUBSTANCE. Memorandum from City
Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 3, 1996.
JR/JD ADOPT ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE` NEW REFORMATTED AND
RENUMBERED MUNICIPAL CODE. VOTE 5-0
6. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURE REQUEST LIST FROM CHIEF OF
POLICE, APPROPRIATE $43,000 OF STATE FUNDING UNDER THE
CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM FOR
LOCAL POLICE CRIME PREVENTION, AND ESTABLISH A
SEPARATE SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE FUND
(SLESF). Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated October 1, 1996.
THERE WAS A CONSENSUS OF COUNCIL TO LOOK INTO ALTERNATIVES
TO THE D,A R,E. PROGRAM AND MAKE:TONT A;VUTIME AGENDA ITEM
4
JR/SE IVIOTION TO APPROVE. VOTE. 5-0
7. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP). Memorandum from
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 18, 1996.
SEIJB ADOPT RESOLUTION CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING lin
CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT. VOTE; 5-0
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
8. REQUEST FROM AVIATION MARKET FOR DETERMINATION OF
"PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY" FOR ABC OFF -SALE
BEER AND WINE LICENSE. Memorandum from City Manager
Stephen Burrell dated October 1, 1996.
RB/JB MOTION' TO APPROVE LETTER FINDING LICENSE A "PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE" VOTE: 5-0
9. REVIEW OF TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT PROCESS. Memorandum from
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 1, 1996.
JO/SE MOTION -TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE TEXT AMENDMENT TO
SIGN ORDINANCE TO CHANGE RESTRICTIONS ON INSTALLATION OF
BANNERS TO EXTEND THE NUMBER OF PERMITTED DAYS TO 90 DAYS
IN ONE` CALENDAR YEAR WITH AN APPROPRIATE NUMVIBER OF
MINIMUM DAYS FOR BANNERS TO BE ;HUNG; AND RELATED CODE
ENFORCEMENT UTILIZING PARKING ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL
TRIAL PERIOD OF ONE YEAR. VOTE: 5-0
10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
NONE
5
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
a. SCHEDULING APPLICANT INTERVIEWS FOR UNSCHEDULED
VACANCY OF UNEXPIRED TERM ON PARKS, RECREATION
AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION.
Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 3, 1996
CONSENSUS OF COUNCIL TO EXTEND APPLICATION FILING DEADLINE
TO 10/16/96 AND SCHEDULE NTERVIEWS FOR OCTOBER 22, 1996 AT
630PM.
.................
b. REQUEST TO SCHEDULE SPECIAL MEETING FOR
DOWNTOWN PLAN FINAL REVIEW ITEMS. Memorandum from
City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 3, 1996.
CONSENSUS OF COUNCIL TO SCHEDULE SPECIAL MEETING FOR
Tft $ AV, OCTOBER. 17,1996 AT 7:10PM.
12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
NONE
CITIZEN COMMENTS
NONE
ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION: 11:24PM
6
CLOSED SESSION TIMES
10/8/96
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION: 11VPM
RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION: 11:58PM
ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS: NONE
ADJOURNMENT: 11:58PM -1) N� t_e h - 5 o-,� t-0/11 a 1 1
-'eft
•
•
5FEftD: 10-08-q6
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, October 8,
1996, at the hour of 7:)Q P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 1�
ROLL CALL:
Present: :enz Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
Absent:
MAYOR'S COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS: --X4_,-/L-61-4.•--s--644.4„."
l D/-1-� clG�-.n- 3,4-7
PROCLAMATIONS: HEALTHY CHOICE AMERICAN HEART WALK
OCTOBER 19, 1996
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your
comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from
taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda.
(a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on
any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this
time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be
heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to
one minute. Citizens may also speak:
(1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent
Calendar;
(2) during Public Hearings;
(3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items
appearing under Municipal Matters; and,
(4) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen
Comments".
Citizens with comments regarding City management or
departmental operations are requested to submit those comments
to the City Manager. Members of the Public wishing to request
removal of an item from the consent calendar may do so at this
time.
City Council Minutes 10-08-96 Page 9240
-f... I 0 — . Vie f C .,4-;-1-se()
l
L -m I% /max-ta-mAJ - ✓/ f J €4 . 9--/Low-
"-e---a,e-v-)Aht-e-,--,--c-LA-,-v., c/,ems•
rc- 7-, (3.:I) ;A -c- - .
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: ,d-m-rz���4,4.---e(A--='p se -x .41„,:,,t, 4_6,..tr, ,f.,2,,,-t:.A-,c4-6-clkot. ,,_&,,_e,,..., -,,-,g;14%5-
,444„4...). A4,,,x- 2.Lea-,16_,..,. (,,,t„,— gt-(-7'-;--A --,a;--e---) *46 A -t- I'M ,41; /211- I -1-d palt-c--.6-c-A-e-k -e-tAi' .,t4:Z...,- 44-4-`41-#1-1-€-31),./U4A-t-44A)pc-tDroc-f"
•
•
At 7: P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to
the public hearings starting with item 4.
(b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None
(c) COUNCIL COMMENTS:
/46yec,7
5yc:1
br-3),1A2_.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters
will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority
consent, roll call, vote of the Council. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember
removes an item from the consent calendar.
Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3, with
public comments permitted at that time.
Action: To approve the consent calendar
(a) through (t), with the exception of
items which were removed for discussion
are shown in order for clarity: (a)
Motion second The
unanimous vote.
recommendations
the following
in item 3, but
motion
carried by a
No one came forward to address the Council on items not
removed from the consent calendar.
City Council Minutes 10-08-96
Page 9241
•
(a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES:
1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held on
September 18, 1996; and,
2) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on September 24,
1996.
Action: To approve the minutes of the Adjourned Regular
Meeting of September 18, 1996 and the Regular Meeting of
September 24, 1996 as presented.
(b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 8130
THROUGH 8286, NOTING VOIDED CHECK NOS. 8154, 8196, AND
8203, AND, NOTING THE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NOS. 7371,
7993, 7994 AND 7995 AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY TREASURER.
-70111;A/ S47q
Action: To ratify the check re ister,as,presented.
(c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE ND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE
AGENDA ITEMS.
•
Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda
items as presented.
(d) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
TO AWARD A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,275.00 TO WEST
ROOFING FOR ROOFING REPAIRS AND TO MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS
WITHIN THE APPROVED BUDGET. Memorandum from Public Works
Director Amy Amirani dated September 24, 1996.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) authorize the Director of Public Works to award a
contract to West Roofing of Torrance for roofing
repairs in the amount of $5,275 for repairs to the
following five buildings:
a) Community Center - North Wing;
b) Community Center - Garage;
c) 4th and Ardmore Bicentennial Park Building;
d) City Yard - Mechanics Shop; and,
e) City Yard - Animal Control Shed, and,
2) approve an amount up to $1,055, which is a twenty
percent (20%) contingency, for the replacement of
damaged lumber at $1.50 per lineal foot, as the true
quantity will not be known until the roofs are
uncovered.
City Council Minutes 10-08-96 Page 9242
•
(e) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS AND REFER THEM TO
THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from
Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated September 24, 1996.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to deny the
following claims and refer to the City's Liability Claims
Administrator .
1) Claimant: Miller, Holly
Date of Loss: 4/27/96
Date Filed: 9/24/96
Allegation Alleges City failed to adequately
have in place traffic controls
regulating traffic along Olympic
torch route and as a result was
struck by vehicle while attempting to
cross street; and,
Stern, Jillian
3/31/96
9/30/96
Alleges dangerous condition of Strand
and negligence of City employees
created condition whereby claimant,
while roller bladeing, suffered
injuries when struck by bicyclist.
2) Claimant:
Date of Loss:
Date Filed:
Allegation .
(f) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE $3,869.00 FROM THE FIRE
FLOW FUND FOR THE PURCHASE OF TEN BREATHING APPARATUS
BOTTLES. Memorandum from Fire Chief Pete Bonano dated
September 30, 1996.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve
the appropriation of $3,869 from the Fire Flow Fund for
the replacement purchase of ten (10) breathing apparatus
bottles, used by fire fighters to enter into a hazardous
environment, which will reach expiration date at the end
of this month (October, 1996.)
(g) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD CONTRACT TO EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING
AND EQUIPMENT, INC. FOR AN AMOUNT OF $234,570 FOR THREE
YEARS OF SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND VIDEO
INSPECTION AND AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO
MAKE MINOR CHANGES WITHIN THE BUDGET. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated October 2, 1996.
City Council Minutes 10-08-96 Page 9243
•
•
•
This item was removed from the consent calendar by
Councilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the
meeting.
Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) award the contract to Empire Pipe Cleaning and
Equipment, Inc. for a total amount of $234,570 for
three years of sanitary sewer system maintenance and
video inspection as follows:
a) year 1 $82,670;
b) year 2 $74,500;
c) year 3 $77,400;
d) total $234,570; and,
2) authorize the Director of Public Works to make
contingency changes up to an amount of $16,534,
which is twenty percent (20%) of the budgeted amount
of $99,204.
Motion , second The motion carried, noting the
dissenting vote of
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES
(a) #ORDINANCE NO. 96-11-63-1- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, SECTION 17.04.040, MODIFYING THE
DEFINITION AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING BUILDING
HEIGHT AND GRADE." For adoption. Memorandum from
City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 3, 1996.
Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 96-1163:
Motion J12 , sF'econd- t
AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
NOES: None
City Council Minutes 10-08-96 Page 9244
•
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR
DISCUSSION
Items 1( ), ( ), ( ), and ( ) were heard at this
are shown in order for clarity.
Public comments on items removed from the
,�y� calendar are shown under the appropriate item.'
/�< �!%� f7 -P AIL 7.'.-7 00/n
PUBLIC HEARINGS
•
SEPARATE
time but
consent
4. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL,
WITH MODIFICATIONS, OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW
6,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH AUTO REPAIR
AND OFFICE USES AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AT 807 - 21ST STREET. Memorandum from
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated
October 1, 1996. Supplemental letter from George and
Roxanne Hash received October 7, 1996. ut"7 ,L L%fri-oyv%-
Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the
staff report and responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at 7:/y P.M. Coming forward to
address the Council on this item was: / / ��✓ v_0
--6), 4.-790/ ((/-2,24.Ati,i_A__4) c __ (T C__/ -z__ ,v,e..„ ,
,�-� :�,' U
rte'—I� -
, I/DA--#.4t.)16,,T4-- At,t-c,A,M-ci-1 X.tt,.- 04`,/--,4-'1 -- /.:2,L_c_gezec,e0
/4:‘ar" -0-7-1-1-1,,,tc,L0-_,) - _tv....,i_ aez....„__A_ /6_4_0, 4....,i_t„.....“._„.?
,2z 0)2
The public hearing closed at 7: P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To sustain
the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the
requested Precise Development Plan and Conditional Use
•
01<#11 Permit subject to the conditions as contained in th�e�,
Planning Commission Resolution No. 96-28. . 41)e4-›-04-,
City Council Minutes
,'yam -r vJ�,
cgzlito-nAp)olpkov) _,,,,,,,„_507„e ,,,,,,,,___,2_,•-i-ci--77-r)._2,7,74y
:-?-0(__77.-xt 742-2-1-2/ 4 --9---(':...--ev.< A,_,_,-,_„ c___
i-ei-i-P-1--r(--lv /-73--i n9--/ _I", e - Q97 -2:x.7? -i p -y -r -y &
• 747e. '''' ' g e - - ? : > f C --j-2 C):?7 40 ( 'r'Y I v 7 2 -7r7 -°-r 1 / fQ:T)
Cri-lr. "Tr'el 79-1.-- w,,./e A az i -,rile
P
______,_
/A,
z-- mss/ - �� `,-�� -y ' -' - -r-v T �'_'-e�'g
-2_2 _,,,,,,,, g -c -2-.)-1,,i ,-,-7.-7:2_,,,I,
/"/
19 -7-t-7# f af'l _14,ZeTe; t -,i'-,r
7-)P7C71 Q ' ;)Ve.17."; (;(7;'=" : Z 4 7 7 i . "7-.t{_.._f'114
)7:7774041, 71c1111 ->L1-0" / •A`71- vCY )1-71—Q1 fr-'ql --(r)Lte 1412 -
lei G Yr = -
• C'-'7-°- C-'-'-'-"-. " V---7-17`"7"'''''-0
--C17:7( -4/Vdi 0 l , c ) -c-7-711-"r. •
' ' : 7 4
(,--v--7‹,v 74-73-r7-9.-- ,rte /c, 6f7/6 lV
__. 7 6
• or ) -^4'"V _z G
�J
_cr_t_e_y .....
,e--, y--.4•09-,-
c--7,. 7e),-0---, ,,-.-y,.0-r .04.,, (t,-)-rp
.
yt-,.a c4--)--(7,
.,�.6, ii Q ,� _-ra .
r
k -,'-e •-1. ('-'--7 (-'-'-°-`71-/-v-V 77.1c:p " ir-
t-i )-yrd-- (7' ril-r0( --1-rift 7W1 c'-e-ifty-d --
-t c-ri------7f,vA Aa-7-7.1-PW1-"
0-
-,''' moo, d-,�-�-�-'
r7f yio/J
•
.
City Council Minutes 10-08-96 Page 9246
5. ADOPTION OF THE CITY CODE - RECODIFIED VERSION, WHICH RE-
FORMATS AND RE -NUMBERS THE EXISTING CODE BUT MAKES NO
CHANGES TO ITS SUBSTANCE. Memorandum from City Clerk
Elaine Doerfling dated October 3, 1996.
City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report, and
responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at /o:5" P.M. Coming forward to
address the Council on this item was:
As no one came forward to address the Council on this item the
public hearing closed at /t7: d P.M.
Action: To.�adopt Ordinance No. 96-1167
Motion, second
AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
NOES: None
6. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURE REQUEST LIST FROM CHIEF OF
POLICE, APPROPRIATE $43,000 OF STATE FUNDING UNDER THE
CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM FOR
LOCAL POLICE CRIME PREVENTION, AND ESTABLISH A SEPARATE
SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE FUND (SLESF).
Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated October 1,
1996.
Police Chief Straser presented the
responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at //:O/ P.M.
address the Council on this item was:
staff report and
Coming forward to
As no one came forward to address the Council on this item the.
public hearing closed at // : OSP.M.
ok,d- 9b
fiit*44-7 •
xg-e7 )17-- —
g/1 76 7—� ';
- ,
76vcr-7/71 '°P
zt--72y
doi
g17 14/
patA-14" . ate- •
---40w•311--•61r.,,���- •''�/_/' , -77-2& awgio/att-
/moi rte.^
•
I�
`' �` � o u
•
r zs..z1s�!'
•
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) use state funding under the Citizen's Option for
Public Safety (COPS) Program for local crime
prevention programs;
2) approve the expenditure request list from the Chief
of Police and appropriate $43,000 in COPS funds;
and,
3) establish a separate supplemental law enforcement
service fund (SLESF) through the Finance Department.
Motion e./ , second E t The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
7. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP). Memorandum from
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated
September 18, 1996.
Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the
staff report and responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at J/ :017 P.M. Coming forward to
address the Council on this item was:
As no one came forward to address the Council on this item the
public hearing closed at l/ : 6 7P.M.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt
(Resolution No. 96=5833' entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF -THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,
FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL
IMPLEMENTATION REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089."
Motion , second J� . The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution certifying compliance
with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and adopting
the CMP Local Implementation Report.
City Council Minutes 10-08-96 Page 9247 -
•
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
8. REQUEST FROM AVIATION MARKET FOR DETERMINATION OF "PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY" FOR ABC OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE
LICENSE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell
dated October 1, 1996.
6
City Manager 1-1 presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions.
Public participation opened at 1:;SP.M.
2"-":"^
•
•
Public participation closed at P.M.
Action: To make the determination that the issuance of
an off -sale beer and wine license to Aviation Market at
1139 Aviation Boulevard is in the public convenience or
necessit
Motion second -J . The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
RECOMMENDATION: Consider request.
9. REVIEW OF TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT PROCESS. Memorandum from
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated
October 1, 1996.
Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the
staff report and responded to Council questions.
Public participation opened at P.M. Coming forward to
address the Council on this item were:
City Coun
1 Minutes 10-08-96
Page 9248
017-P? 90 i4c4/-)
i ' '"
C
d-/P"';f
u • lic participation closed at //:;)P.M. w -►-'-Q-4
To direct staff to return withAtte
Proposed Action:
proper Ordinance to eliminate the regulation of banner
signs.
Motion
, second
2!7)-(Lii
The motion
•
Action: To direct staff to:
1) maintain the current policy and procedures;
2) increase the duration for displaying banner signs
and thereby reduce the frequency of inspection for
code enforcement,
Motion , second The motion carried, noting the
dissenting votes of .
RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction on banner signs
relative to 1) maintaining the current policy and
procedures, 2) increasing the duration for displaying
banner signs and thereby reduce the frequency of
inspection for code enforcement, 3) requiring a deposit
with each banner sign application to ensure the banners
are removed on time, and 4) eliminating the regulation of
banner signs.
10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
a. SCHEDULING APPLICANT INTERVIEWS FOR UNSCHEDULED
VACANCY OF UNEXPIRED TERM ON PARKS, RECREATION AND
COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION. Memorandum
from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 3,
1996
City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions.
Action: To schedule applicant interviews for October 22,
1996 at the hour of ' : 30 P.M. and to extend the
application filing deadline to Wednesday, October 16,
1996 at 6:00 P.M.
Motion , second The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
City Council Minutes 10-08-96 Page 9249
•
RECOMMENDATION: Schedule a meeting just prior to
regular scheduled meeting of October 22, 1996 to
interview applicants.
b. REQUEST TO SCHEDULE SPECIAL MEETING FOR DOWNTOWN
PLAN FINAL REVIEW ITEMS. Memorandum from City
Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 3, 1996.
City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions.
Action: To schedule Thursday, October 17, 1996, at the
hour of 7:10 P.M. for an Adjourned Regular Meeting to
make decisions regarding colors for street furniture and
light fixtures for the Downtown Implementation Plan.
Motion , second The motion carried by a
unanimous vote. /l1J
RECOMMENDATION: Schedule Special Meeting for
Thursday, October 17, 1996 at 7:00 p.m.
12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within
the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time.
Please limit comments to three minutes.
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN
CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS:
1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on
September 24, 1996.
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
Anticipated Litigation: Government Code Section
54956.9(b) (3) (E)
City Council Minutes 10-08-96 Page 9250
•
•
•
A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the
City Council on the advice of its legal counsel, based on
the below -described existing facts and circumstances,
there is a significant exposure to litigation against the
City Council.
Number of potential cases: 1
Statement made by Mr. Trott outside an open meeting of
City regarding a threat of litigation and a record of the
statement made by the City's special labor counsel,
Richard Kreisler.
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, October 8, 1996 at
the hour of •P.M. to the Adjourned Regular Meeting of
Thursday, October 17, 1996 at the hour of 7:10 P.M. for the
purpose of reviewing and making final selection of colors and
street furniture and light fixtures for the Downtown
Implementation Plan.
Deputy City Clerk
City Council Minutes 10-08-96 Page 9251
"Autumn is a season followed immediately by looking forward to spring." - Doug Larson
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 8, 1996 - Council Chambers, City Hall
Regular Session - 7:10 p.m.
Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session
MAYOR CITY CLERK
Julie Oakes Elaine Doerfling
MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER
J. R. Reviczky John M. Workman
COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER
Robert Benz Stephen R. Burrell
John Bowler CITY ATTORNEY
Sam Y. Edgerton Michael Jenkins
All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly
every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the
Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the
Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council
foyer.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MAYOR'S COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
PROCLAMATIONS:
HEALTHY CHOICE AMERICAN HEART WALK
OCTOBER 19, 1996
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the
Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on
the posted agenda.
(a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the
Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing
items must be heard during the public hearings.) Members of the public wishing to
request the removal of an item from the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Please
limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak:
1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar;
2) during Public Hearings;
3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under
Municipal Matters; and,
4) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments".
Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are
requested to submit those comments to the City Manager.
(b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
(c) COUNCIL COMMENTS
1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted
upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There
will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an
item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda
Item 3, with public comment permitted at that time.
(a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes:
1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on September 18, 1996;
2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on September 24, 1996.
(b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of
certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer.
(c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items.
(d) Recommendation to authorize the Director of Public Works toward a
contract 'n the amount of $5,275.00 to West Roofing for roofing repairs and
to ma a minor adjustments within the approved budget. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated September 24, 1996.
(e) Recommendation to deny the following claims and refer to the City's
Liability Claims Administrator. Memorandum from Risk Manager
Robert Blackwood dated September 25, 1996.
Claimant: Miller, Holly
Date of Loss: 4/27/96
Date Filed: 9/24/96
Claimant: Stern, Jillian
Date of Loss: 3/31/96
Date Filed: 9/30/96
Recommendation to appropriate $3,869.00 from the Fire Flow Fund for the
purchase of ten breathing apparatus bottles. Memorandum from Fire Chief
Pete Bonano dated September 30, 1996.
Recommendation to ward contract o Empire Pipe Cleaning and
Equipment, Inc. for an amount of 234,570 for three years of sanitary sewer
system maintenance and video inspection and authorize the Director of
Public Works to make minor changes within the budget. Memorandum from
Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated October 2, 1996.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES
a. (ORDINANCE NO. 96-1163 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF V
HERMOSA BEACH, CAL ORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, SECTION 17.04.040, MODIFYING THE
DEFINITION AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING BUILDING
HEIGHT AND GRADE." For adoption. Memorandum from City
Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 3, 1996.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR
SEPARATE DISCUSSION.
* Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar.
3
PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M.
4. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVAL, WITH MODIFICATIONS, OF A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A NEW 6,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH
AUTO REPAIR AND OFFICE USES AND ADOPTION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 807 - 21ST
STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld
dated October 1, 1996.
PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To
sustain the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the requested Precise
Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit bject to the conditions as
m
contained in the Planning Comissionkesolution.
5. ADOPTION OF 1 HE CITY CODE - RECODIFIED VERSION, WHICH
RE -FORMATS AND RE -NUMBERS THE EXISTING CODE BUT
MAKES NO CHANGES TO ITS SUBSTANCE_ Memorandum from City
Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 3, 1996.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct Public Hearing and (adopt ordinanc)adopting
the new reformatted and renumbered Municipal Code.
6. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURE REQUEST LIST FROM CHIEF OF
POLICE, APPROPRIATE $43,000 OF STATE FUNDING UNDER THE
CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM FOR
LOCAL POLICE CRIME PREVENTION, AND ESTABLISH A
SEPARATE SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE FUND
(SLESF). Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated October 1, 1996.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
7. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP). Memorandum from
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 18, 1996.
RECOMMENDATION:CAdopt resolutioroi certifying compliance with the
Congestion Management Program (CMP) and adopting the CMP Local
Implementation Report.
4
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
8. REQUEST FROM AVIATION MARKET FOR DETERMINATION OF
"PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY" FOR ABC OFF -SALE
BEER AND WINE LICENSE. Memorandum from City Manager
Stephen Burrell dated October 1, 1996.
RECOMMENDATION: Consider request.
9. REVIEW OF TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT PROCESS. Memorandum from
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated October 1, 1996.
RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction on banner signs relative to 1)
maintaining the current policy and procedures, 2) increasing the duration for
displaying banner signs and thereby reduce the frequency of inspection for code
enforcement, 3) requiring a deposit with each banner sign application to ensure the
banners are removed on time, and 4) eliminating the regulation of banner signs.
10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
NONE
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
a. SCHEDULING APPLICANT INTERVIEWS FOR UNSCHEDULED
VACANCY OF UNEXPIRED TERM ON PARKS, RECREATION
AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION.
Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated October 3, 1996
RECOMMENDATION: Schedule a meeting just prior to regular
scheduled meeting of October 22, 1996 to interview applicants.
b. REQUEST TO SCHEDULE SPECIAL MEETING FOR
DOWNTOWN PLAN FINAL REVIEW ITEMS. Memorandum from
City Manager Stephen Burrell dated October 3, 1996.
RECOMMENDATION: Schedule Special Meeting for Thursday,
October 17, 1996 at 7:00pm.
12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL
NONE
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction
may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes.
ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN
CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS:
1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on September 24, 1996.
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
Anticipated Litigation: Government Code Section
54956.9(b)(3)(E)
A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council on the advice
of its legal counsel, based on the below -described existing facts and circumstances,
there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City Council.
Number of potential cases: 1
Statement made by Mr. Trott outside an open meeting of City regarding a threat of
litigation and a record of the statement made by the City's special labor counsel,
Richard Kreisler.
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
6
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of
the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Wednesday,
September 18, 1996, at the hour of 7:10 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Chamber of Commerce president Rick Hankus
ROLL CALL:
Present: Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
Absent: Benz (arrived at 8:06 P.M.)
DOWNTOWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. Memorandum from Public Works
dated September 11, 1996.
Mayor Oakes said this evening the Council would be reviewing
what the streetscape project will look like. She said the
architects will draw up the plans during the next phase (design
development and construction documents), and during that phase
there would be a number of planning workshops for all of the
downtown merchants and the residents to discuss scheduling and
phasing, with a full session to allow input from everyone as to
how it should be accomplished. She said the City would be
hiring a construction administrator, who will be in charge of
making sure that the finished product adheres to the plans and
specifications, that all schedules for construction are met on
time, and that all concerns are aired and alleviated. She said
the planning workshops will begin in October.
In response to questions, Public Works Director Amirani said the
final construction documents would be completed in December and
construction would begin in January.
IBI Group representatives Mark Tannin, project manager, and Mike
Majors, landscape architect, came forward to present the
preliminary design.
Mr. Tannin first provided a progress report, saying they were
about halfway through the process of going from the design that
was approved during the schematic design, phase and leading
toward the completion of the bid documents. He presented three
drawings that were on display: the first was the drawing
presented in 1994 showing the original concept for the
streetscape, the second was an intermediate drawing reflecting
some concerns that were raised earlier this year when the
project started up again, and the third drawing reflected the
current status of the design. He said in the current plan, the
traffic on Lower Pier Avenue will remain two-way with a turn-
around centered at Beach Drive; the paving pattern has been
simplified and the materials have been changed; there will be
full-size (25 feet in height) palm trees planted in large (8
feet by 8 feet) planters that would be flush with the ground
rather than raised, made of a decomposed granite material with
an organic binder to enable the trees to breathe and be watered
but with the consistency of asphalt to allow people to pass over
the area; the bicycle parking has been simplified and will be
made of stainless steel, as will the park benches and light
fixtures; and there would be imbedded textured stainless steel
City Council Minutes 09-18-96 Page 9218
strips rather than painted stripes to distinguish the parking
spaces and crosswalks. He said there is coordination between
the streetscape design and the design of the Pier Plaza, which
has started up again recently, noting that they have held off on
the design of the area between the Strand and Beach Drive until
they know more on what is happening with the Pier Plaza, and as
that progresses, they will add some features in that area to tie
in with what is happening on the other side of the Strand.
Mr. Tannin said the original plan had called for granite paving
which is very expensive and, after first explaining that
pavement type A represents the pavement that sits in the large
36 -by -36 -foot -square fields and pavement type B represents the
two -foot -wide bands that mark off those fields into a diamond
pattern that goes down the street, he showed two different
proposed paving options. He said the base scheme (option A)
proposes concrete with a black pigment containing feldspar that
glistens like beach sand for pavement type A, with small granite
pavers to fill in the bands for pavement type B. He said an
alternate scheme (option B) proposes a gray acid -etched
aggregate that combines abalone shells and a light colored stone
for pavement type A. He showed two varieties of abalone size,
recommending the smaller size if the abalone was selected, and
said the pavement type B bands in this scheme would be a gray
acid -etched concrete instead of stone. He said scheme/option A
with feldspar and stone would fall five percent under budget,
while alternate scheme/option B with abalone shells would be
about five percent above the project budget.
Mr. Tannin said two different types of bollards were proposed:
a red granite bollard which contrasts nicely with the ,gray
paving to delineate the sidewalks and crosswalk, and stainless
steel bollards for traffic direction at the head of the street
where it meets Hermosa Avenue and for the turn -around at Beach
Drive, which would fit in with the parking striping and the
bicycle racks and the four information kiosks to create a
unified appearance. He said some of the stainless steel
bollards would be pneumatic bollards, which would be kept in the
lowered position at Hermosa Avenue to make the street accessible
to vehicular traffic and raised when necessary to close off the
street during special events. He said there were also pneumatic
bollards at the traffic circle for emergency vehicle access. He
said attempts to place the traffic circle between Beach Drive
and the Strand resulted in the loss of too much area, so it is
now proposed to be centered at Beach Drive which reduces the
parking on lower Pier Avenue from 29 spaces to 27 spaces.
Mr. Tannin said the most notable change to the lighting is the
elimination of suspended lighting from the center of the street.
He said they were maintaining a nautical theme with the lighting
which will have a stainless steel finish. He presented samples
of the light fixtures which did not have the stainless steel
finish, saying the larger fixture would be at the top of the
cross arms on the street poles, and a similar smaller fixture
would shine down on the information kiosk signage. He said the
general illumination will come from the main lighting on the
City Council Minutes 09-18-96 Page 9219
cross -arm street poles, which will provide a contrast from the
existing downtown sodium lighting so that people will feel that
they are entering a special area. He said to create a special
feeling on the sidewalks, there will be lights incorporated into
the granite bollards that will throw light onto the sidewalk
areas to differentiate them from the street. He said in
addition there would be ground -level (recessed) lights shining
up into the canopy of the palm trees which would create a
dramatic effect. He said they were looking tonight for City
Council approve to proceed in the direction with the budget and
to make a determination on the design issues that were still
outstanding, including paving and the changes to the lighting
and other street furniture.
In response to Council questions, Mr. Majors said they were
proposing large Canary Island palm trees for Pier Avenue, such
as those used at the Fashion Island entry. He said the Canary
Island palm tree has a fat trunk about 20 feet high, then about
5-6 feet of the bulge which is called the pineapple, above which
is a large canopy of fronds about 15 feet high.
In response to Council questions, Mr. Tannin said there are
sealers that can be put on any of the paving options to protect
staining by food, and that they could look at delineating the
center of the street during the next phase if that is Council's
desire. He also reviewed the proposed locations of the benches,
bike racks and information kiosks.
Mayor Oakes again announced that there would be a number of
workshops and planning sessions before the final plans are
approved. She then opened the meeting up for public questions
and comments.
Coming forward to address the City Council at this time were:
Naoma Valdes - Hermosa Beach, questioned the use of palm
trees, saying they are basically tacky (Mr. Majors
said palm trees were chosen to capture the beach
environment, that they are part of the California
beach imagery);
Sam Perrotti - Hermosa Beach, Planning Commissioner, asked
if the new pavement would be rougher and noisier when
vehicles drive over it and if limousines and large
vehicles would be able to maneuver the traffic circle
(Mr. Tannin said the paving options would be no
noisier than standard pavement and that any vehicle
that can pass through the turn -around now will be able
to maneuver the proposed Beach Drive turn -around);
Don Falkenstien - Hermosa Beach, said he also did not want
palm trees, thought that California Cypress was very
Californian; questioned the use of stainless steel
striping, saying it would get very hot and noting that
this was a barefoot pedestrian area;
Gary Kazanjian - Kazanjian Stained Glass, asked about the
cost of the pavement sealer and expressed concern
about the palm trees being 25 -feet tall when planted,
asking how fast and how tall they would grow (Mr.
City Council Minutes 09-18-96 Page 922.0
Majors said the Canary Island palm trees proposed for
Pier Avenue grow perhaps six inches to one foot per
year and are smaller and slower -growing than the
Mexican fan palms which has a skinny trunk and are
proposed for the Hermosa Avenue intersection);
Unidentified man - asked if the palm trees would be
affected by the wind, noting that he has seen some
very crooked trees after couple of harsh winter (Mr.
Majors said there should be no problem);
Brian Mitchell - Hermosa Beach, Parks, Recreation and
Community Resources Commissioner, suggested looking at
the two handicap ramps coming off of Hermosa Avenue,
said because of their width they appear to be
driveways and there may be cars driving up onto the
sidewalk instead of turning at the street opening;
said he liked the palm trees, thought they were an
excellent choice; suggested the furnishing elements
(benches, trash cans, bike racks, kiosks, etc.) be
considered as part of the first phase, recommended
shifting some of the lighting budget funds for
furniture, perhaps lighting the palm trees on one side
only to reduce the lighting cost; suggested that the
design contingency of five percent should be raised to
industry standard of 10 or 15 percent; said there is
no construction contingency shown which he felt should
also be included in the budget; expressed concern
about the four-month (February to May) construction
schedule in the event of a wet, rainy winter;
Dean Nota - Hermosa Beach, Downtown Business Area
Enhancement District Commissioner, spoke in support of
the design; said the tree issue was discussed with
various architects and there is not a wide selection
that would thrive so close to the ocean; said the palm
was not his favorite street tree, but thought it was
the best choice available; said there may be too many
bollards and expressed concern about cars negotiating
the turn -around; said care should be taken in placing
the bollards and was also concerned about their height
in the parking areas since, at only two feet high,
people pulling into the parking spaces will not see
them; also expressed concern with the planters and the
inch and a half step-down from the pavement to the
decompressed granite which may cause people to trip,
agreed the grade change is necessary, but wondered
about a grill on top; and
Unidentified man - asked if the merchants will have to
close their doors during the construction, said they
would need four to five months advance notice in order
to program their purchasing (Public Works Director
Amirani said the City would work closely with the
businesses about shop closures and other issues).
Councilmember Benz arrived at 8:06 P.M.
Continuing to come forward to address the City Council were:
City Council Minutes 09-18-96 Page 9221
Jerry Newton - Hermosa Beach, Downtown Business Area
Enhancement District Commissioner, spoke in support of
the plan; said Pier Avenue merchants basically have
two seasons, summer and the holidays (November and
December; stressed importance of meeting the January
construction start date and the May completion date;
Kenneth Murphy - Avanti Jewelers, concerned about when
businesses will be closed and expressed relief that
the project will not start until January; spoke in
support of the project; said a lot of people in town
think a parking structure with parking meters is
needed first to bring more people into the City;
Mike Zislis - Brewski Brewery, supported the palm trees;
suggested doing the promenade first and then following
up with the parking structure; asked how the stainless
steel parking stripe would be attached (Mr. Tannin
said it would be cast into the concrete);
John Burt - Hermosa Beach, asked if the sidewalks in front
of all the businesses would be enlarged; said he liked
the promenade mall but saw no reason to close Pier
Avenue (Mayor Oakes said the street would be open but
that the City would be able to close it during events,
and the area between the parking and the storefronts
would be enlarged in front of all businesses);
Matt McDaniel - Sangria Restaurant, said the proposed dark
paving would absorb a lot of sunlight and emit a lot
of heat; said most people he has talked to want Pier
Avenue closed to traffic; asked if there would be more
City meetings once the construction starts in January,
noting he was concerned about keeping to the time
schedule (Mayor Oakes said the construction
administrator to be hired by the City would be
available every day to handle any problems/concerns
but that there would be no regular meetings on the
project once construction begins);
Jim Lissner - Hermosa Beach, referred to two letters he
submitted earlier in the meeting, which had been
distributed to Council members; requested that Council
think about the lights and the palm trees and the
annual cost of maintenance; expressed concern about
the height of the palm trees which would start at 25
feet and grow one foot per year, said they would
become a view problem for people and since they cannot
be trimmed on top, they would reach a height of 35
feet in 10 years; wondered if they would be better off
with some other kind of tree to dampen noise at the
street level, citing shade as another advantage of
having greenery at street;
Missy Sheldon - Hermosa Beach, Chamber of Commerce member,
said the project is exciting; said the Chamber is very
interested in this project and will cooperate fully
with the City in communicating with the downtown
merchants and residents to minimize the impacts;
Unidentified man - asked when the parking meters would be
installed on upper Pier Avenue (City Manager Burrell
responded it would be after the first of the year);
City Council Minutes 09-18-96 Page 9222
Kathleen Midstokke - Hermosa Beach, asked what would happen
to the existing palm trees; said a tree planting
program began in 1991 and that trees were paid for by
donations, many in memory of people who had passed
away; said donors included the Newtons, Women's Club,
Chamber of Commerce, Comedy Club, Kathy Bergstrom,
Seymour's Jewelers and BFI; said the trees need to be
handled with respect; suggested that donors be
contacted; said that while several of the trees were
planted on Hermosa Avenue, some were also planted on
Pier Avenue (Mr. Majors said he and Public Works had
discussed relocating the existing trees, perhaps on
the Greenbelt);
Jerry Newton - said the tree he purchased was planted on
Hermosa Avenue and at least the first ten trees he
knew of were planted on Hermosa Avenue; if some were
planted on Pier Avenue, he agreed that consideration
should be given to the donors of those trees;
Kevin Murphy - asked about the upcoming storm drain project
and how long it would take (Public Works Director
Amirani said the storm drain is a County project,
which will start in October and be done before the
streetscape construction, noting that the storm drain
project is located west of beach Drive);
John Hales - Hermosa Beach, said during the summer there
are a lot of volleyball tournaments that are serviced
by huge trucks and asked if any thought had been given
to where they will be parked; asked if delivery trucks
that supply downtown restaurants will service them
from the storefronts or from the rear; asked if
parking meters will be prevalent throughout the area
(Mayor Oakes said the City was looking at placing the
volleyball tournament service trucks elsewhere as part
of the Pierhead design which will follow this project
and that there will be no change concerning restaurant
delivery trucks, that the business may want them to
use the alleyway but that they can use either);
Dallas Yost - Pacific Screenprint, Downtown Business Area
Enhancement District Commissioner, asked who would
control the lease area in front of the stores, the
landlord or the lessee; thought it was an issue that
needed to be looked at (Mayor Oakes said the City will
lease the property to the lessee via an encroachment
permit);
Name Indistinct - Pier Avenue Bakery/Cafe, asked if anyone
had looked at having 24-hour work crews to minimize
the days of construction (Public Works Director
Amirani said they were looking at the most economical
and expeditious way to complete the construction,
including the use of night-time construction);
Unidentified man - asked if it had yet been decided who
would coordinate the construction phase (Mayor Oakes
said the City has gone out to bid for a contract
administrator to be the liaison between the contractor
and the City. Public Works Director Amirani said
several proposals were received which are currently
City Council Minutes 09-18-96 Page 9223
being reviewed, award of bid would be at the next
Council meeting, and the contract administrator would
be available in an office or a trailer in the downtown
area); and
Leslie Newton - asked if it was financially feasible for
the City to include a bonus for early completion as
well as liquidated damages for a late completion;
There being no further public comments, Mayor Oakes closed the
public participation portion of the meeting.
The meeting recessed at 9:00 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 9:18 P.M.
City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions, saying that
staff would look into the issue of the donated trees, contact
the donors, and come back with a separate tree program including
where the trees would be located. He said it has always been
the City's intention to relocate the trees, noting that the
Coastal Commission also wants the trees to be relocated, that
they are not to be destroyed. He also said electrical outlets
would be located throughout the project to allow for holiday
lighting and for other purposes.
Mr.. Tannin responded to Council questions, saying the stainless
steel parking strips are durable and require little care. He
said removal of the strips, if desired later, would be a minor
job, but that if the street is eventually closed to be used as a
walking plaza, the stainless steel strips would be seen as part
of the overall pattern. He said the benches would be located
under the palm canopies and during mid-day would be in the
shade, noting that stainless steel is a standard feature along
waterfronts where there is a problem with corrosion. He said he
could provide some other material options if desired.
City Manager Burrell said staff could provide an estimate of the
cost of removing the stainless steel strips and would look into
the use of Birdex or a similar product to discourage bird
droppings on the light fixtures.
In response to Council questions, Mr. Majors said the placement
of Mexican fan palms at the Hermosa Avenue intersection would
distinguish the threshold and give a special feel to Pier
Avenue, but would also preclude the resultant visibility problem
that would be created if Canary Island palms were placed there.
By consensus of City Council, the stainless steel parking strips
and stainless steel bollards were approved as presented. The
proposal to place Canary Island palm trees on Pier Avenue and
Mexican fan palm trees at the Hermosa Avenue intersection were
also approved as presented.
Action: To approve the preliminary design of Lower Pier
Avenue and direct staff to continue with the preparation of
the construction documents subject to the comments listed
below, and to approve the funding plan and the expenditure
City Council Minutes 09-18-96 Page 9224
of funds from the various sources listed in the staff
report for construction of the Lower Pier Avenue Street
Improvement Project. The comments and directions were as
follows: 1) to use reddish granite pavers as the trim for
pavement type B as well as for the standard bollards, with
a lighter gray concrete with feldspar for pavement type A;
2) to reduce the number of bollards; 3) to reduce the size
of the Hermosa Avenue handicap ramps; 4) to reduce the
number of palm tree up -lights; 5) to add tree planter
grates; 6) to change the height of the bollards; 7) to
revise the material of the Beach Drive aprons; 8) to place
parking meter fastening devices on the light poles; 9) to
add hydraulic bollards on Beach Drive; and 10) to direct
staff and the consultants to come back with color -scheme
options for the furniture, which includes the light
fixtures, benches, kiosks and bicycle racks, for Council
review at a regular meeting in October.
Motion Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Coming forward to address the City Council were:
Jim Lissner - Hermosa Beach, suggested not putting a
painted finish on anything accessible to people's
hands because a lot of people like to scratch their
initials onto items;
John Burt - Hermosa Beach, spoke in favor of the downtown
implementation plan; and
Patricia Spiritus - Hermosa Beach, Downtown Business Area
Enhancement District Commissioner, said recessed up -
lights for trees are scenic but are not good for
pedestrian walkways because they get hot, suggested
placing the lights part-way up the tree as was done in
Newport Beach.
ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council
of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Wednesday, September
18, 1996 at the hour of 10:40 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of
Tuesday, June 24, 1996 at the hour of 7:10 P.M.
14
City frk
City Council Minutes 09-18-96 Page 9225
}
d
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City
of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, September 24,
1996, at the hour of 7:13 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -
ROLL CALL:
Present: Benz, Bowler,
Absent: Edgerton
PROCLAMATIONS:
John Hales, resident
Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
LAWSUIT ABUSE AWARENESS WEEK SEPTEMBER 23 - 27, 1996
Mayor Oakes read the proclamation, proclaimed the period from
September 23 - 27, 1996, as LAWSUIT ABUSE AWARENESS WEEK and
urged citizens to learn of the cost and abuses of frivolous
lawsuits.
CALIFORNIA RIDESHARE WEEK OCTOBER 7 - 11, 1996
Mayor Oakes read the proclamation, proclaimed the period from
OCTOBER 7 - 11, 1996, as CALIFORNIA RIDESHARE WEEK and urged
citizens to rideshare, not only this week, but to endeavor to
rideshare throughout the year.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
(a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Roger Bacon - 1100 Pacific Coast Highway, expressed
concerns regarding banner regulations; said
that they are too restrictive and asked the
Council to direct that enforcement not be
continued until the policy could be reviewed;
Tom Ennis - Hermosa Car Wash, said that his business
had been closed for nine months for renovation
and that people did not know that he was now
open; said that he needed banners to draw
attention to this fact; and,
Eddie Talbot - E.T. Surfboards, said he agreed with
the previous speakers.
Action: Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the
Council, that staff return with a report on proposed
changes to the banner regulations for the Regular Meeting
of October 8, 1996, noting the absence of Edgerton and
the abstention of Bowler.
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9226
la®
Continuing to come forward to address the Council at this time
were:
Betty Ryan - President, Hermosa Woman's Club,
introduced Debbie Reiger, First Vice -President,
and announced the Woman's Club annual "Pancake
Breakfast" to be held on the last Sunday in
October, October 27, 1996, from 9:00 A.M. until
12:00 noon at the Clark Building, 861 Valley
Drive, with prices of $5.00 for adults and
$3.00 for children; presented invitations to
the Council to attend and if possible "serve
the citizens of Hermosa"; said the door prize
was a yacht trip of the harbor for twenty
people donated by the owner of "Body Glove";
and, that last year the Woman's Club had
donated over $26,000 to local charities;
Elyse Grace - Beach Cities Health District,
announced a free educational clinic and
confidential screening for depression on
Thursday, October 10, 1996, from 3:00 P.M.
until 7:00 P.M. at the South Bay Medical
Center;
Rick Hankus - President-elect of the Hermosa Beach
Chamber of Commerce, presented a check in the
amount of $8,600 to Mayor Oakes for the City
and said that this check represented the amount
collected by the Chamber from vendors without
Hermosa Beach business licenses at the Labor
Day Fiesta; said he hoped this would be used
for the enhancement of activities in the
downtown area;
Bruce Selin - 1644 Hermosa Avenue, asked if any
member of the Council had reviewed the material
that he had submitted at the last meeting; said
that Councilmember Edgerton had said that maybe
the question of allowing tattooing as a
permitted use in Hermosa Beach should be a
ballot measure for the people to decide; asked
if the Council would place the question of
permitted use on the ballot, and if not, he
would he would be interested in an initiative
petition to place the question on a special
election;
Shirley Cassell - Hermosa Beach, questioned when the
Planning Commission meeting on the proposed
hotel would take place (City Manager Stephen
Burrell said that there was a special meeting
on the draft E.I.R. tomorrow night, Wednesday,
September 25, 1996, at 7:00 P.M. to be held
here in the Council Chambers); spoke against
the hotel, said that it would be over 30 feet
in height; said that a lot of people did not
know that the subject of allowing tattoo
parlors into Hermosa Beach was on the agenda a
few meetings ago or there would have been many
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9227
more to speak against it; said most of the
people in favor of allowing tattoo parlors did
not live in the City and suggested that they
have tattooing in their own communities; said
Hermosa residents wanted to build the City up,
not tear it down; and,
John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, said that he does
not want tattoo parlors in Hermosa Beach; spoke
in favor of the proposed hotel on the Strand,
said that the City needed the revenue.
(b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
1) Letter from Al Valdes dated September 16, 1996
requesting City Council approval of the "El Camino
Real" Mission Bell Project.
Coming forward to address the council on this item were:
Al Valdes - 2840 Araby Place, explained that the
money to purchase the "Mission Bell" was a
surplus from the sale of Bi -Centennial coins
during that celebration and that they wished to
use the money to bring back a piece of history
to Hermosa Beach; introduced Mr. Hales as the
designer of both the bi-centennial coin and the
City Seal; and,
John Hales - 624 Eighth Place, gave a history of the
mission bells; said they had been placed near
hundreds of intersections along route 101, also
known as Pacific Coast Highway and El Camino
Real among other names, by the Auto Club and
that Hermosa had had such a bell on the
southwest corner of P.C.H. and Pier Avenue
until the late 1950s when the road had been
widened and the bell had disappeared; said that
through research he had located one of the
original men who had cast the bells and that we
could obtain a true replica.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve
the request and direct staff to assist in any manner
possible.
Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
2) Letter from Jim Lissner dated September 10, 1996
regarding placement of signs directing traffic to
satellite parking for the Fiesta De Las Artes.
Action: To receive and file the letter and refer it to
the Chamber of Commerce.
Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting
the absence of Edgerton.
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9228
(c) COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Mayor Oakes announced:
1) The death of Sheila Donahue Miller on September 17, 1996,
a lifelong resident of Hermosa Beach who had been very
active in the community;
2) The Sunday, September 29, 1996, auction for "Friends of
Our Sister City" at 1800 The Strand, home of Chuck and
Missy Sheldon, from 2:00 - 5:00 P.M.;
3) The "Walktoberfest" to be held on Sunday, October 6,
1996, starting at Veterans Park in Redondo Beach to
Benefit the American Diabetes Association;
4) Concerns regarding the number of outside activities
scheduled for the City's parks, particularly Valley Park,
that prevented residents from using these facilities and
asked staff to review the current policy; and,
5) Thanked everyone who had attended the September 18, 1996,
meeting on the Downtown revitalization.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations
(a) through (k), with the exception of the following item
which was removed for discussion in item 3, but is shown
in order for clarity: (e) Benz.
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a
unanimous vote, noting the absence of Edgerton..
No one came forward to address the Council on items not
removed from the consent calendar.
(a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES:
2) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on September 10,
1996; and,
1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held on
September 12, 1996.
Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of
September 10, 1996 and the Adjourned Regular Meeting of
September 12, 1996 as presented. (Edgerton absent)
(b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 7992
THROUGH 8129 INCLUSIVE.
Action: To ratify the check register as presented.
(Edgerton absent)
(c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE
AGENDA ITEMS.
Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda
items as presented. (Edgerton absent)
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9229
(d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MEMORANDUM REGARDING
THE AUGUST 1996 FINANCIAL REPORTS.
Action: To receive and file the memorandum regarding the
August, 1996, Financial Reports being delayed due to the
preparations for the 1995-96 audit. (Edgerton absent)
(e) RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE TO RETAIN JOHN L. HUNTER AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PERFORM TASK AND ADMINISTER THE
CITY'S MUNICIPAL STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF DISCHARGE
PROGRAMS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy
Amirani dated September 3, 1996.
This item was removed from the consent calendar by
Councilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the
meeting in order to question if this could be done with
City staff.
Public Works Director Amirani responded to Council
questions.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize
the continued retention of John L. Hunter and Associates,
Inc. to perform certain tasks required by the new NPDES
permit and to administer the City's Municipal Storm Water
and Urban Runoff Discharge Programs.
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried,
noting the dissenting vote of Benz and the absence of
Edgerton.
(f) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM V.O.I.C.E.
(VOLUNTEERS AND ORGANIZATIONS IMPROVING THE COMMUNITIES
ENVIRONMENT) FOR A "GREEN HOLIDAY FEST" TO BE HELD ON THE
COMMUNITY CENTER LAW ON SATURDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1996
SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS. Memorandum from Community
Resources Director Mary Rooney dated September 16, 1996.
Action: To approve the Downtown Business Area
Enhancement District Commission and staff recommendation
to approve the request from Volunteers and Organizations
Improving the Communities Environment (V.O.I.C.E.) for a
"Green Holiday Fest" to be held on the community Center
lawn on Saturday, December 7, 1996, subject to certain
conditions which include indemnification of the City and
provision of a $2,000,000 liability insurance policy;
provision of trash receptacles and cleaning the event
area afterward; and, payment of certain fees. (Edgerton
absent)
(g) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
RESIDENTIAL WASTE INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT, PUENTE HILLS
LANDFILL ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. Memorandum from City
Manager Stephen Burrell dated September 9, 1996.
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9230
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize
the Mayor to execute the contract for the Residential
Waste Indemnification Agreement, Puente Hills Landfill on
behalf of the City with the Los Angeles County Sanitation
District No. 2. (Edgerton absent)
(h) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM
THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF 9/17/96.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive
and file action minutes from the Planning Commission
meeting of September 17, 1996. (Edgerton absent)
(i) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AWARD OF BID OF THE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONTRACT FOR LOWER PIER AVENUE TO
ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $89,472.
Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated
September 17, 1996.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) approve the award of the construction management
contract for Lower Pier Avenue to ASL Consulting
Engineers in the amount of $89,472;
2) prescribe that the Director of Public Works reject
all other proposals;
3) authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor
changes as necessary within fifteen percent (15%) of
the contract cost; and,
4) appropriate $102,900 in Downtown Business Area
Enhancement District funds to the Lower Pier Avenue
Project for construction management services.
(Edgerton absent)
(j) RECOMMENDATION TO USE STATE FUNDING UNDER THE CITIZEN'S
OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM FOR LOCAL POLICE
CRIME PREVENTION PROGRAMS; APPROVE EXPENDITURE REOUEST
LIST FROM CHIEF OF POLICE AND APPROPRIATE $43,000 IN COPS
FUNDS; ESTABLISH A SEPARATE SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
SERVICE FUND (SLESF) THROUGH FINANCE; AND, SET OCTOBER 8,
1996 AS A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE FINAL IMPLEMENTATION.
Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated September
16, 1996.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) use state funding under the Citizen's Option for
Public Safety (COPS) Program for local crime
prevention programs;
2) approve the expenditure request list from the Chief
of Police and appropriate $43,000 in COPS funds;
3) establish a separate supplemental law enforcement
service fund (SLESF) through the Finance Department;
and,
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9231
4) notice a public hearing for the October 8, 1996,
meeting before final implementation. (Edgerton
absent)
(k) RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT STAFF TO STUDY PARKING PROBLEMS
IN THE 21ST STREET & BORDEN STREET RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD IN CONNECTION WITH ADJACENT COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Memorandum from Community Development
Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 16, 1996.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) proceed to survey the daytime parking in the area
from the east side of Pacific Coast Highway to the
east side of Hillcrest Drive and from the north side
of 18th Street to the north end of Borden Avenue and
Rhodes Street to determine the extent of the problem
in this residential neighborhood; and,
2) provide daytime parking restrictions, if required,
based upon the area study. (Edgerton absent)
At 7:56 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to
the public hearings starting with item 4.
2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION
Items 1(e) was heard at this time but is shown in order
for clarity.
Public comments on items removed from the consent
calendar are shown under the appropriate item.
The meeting recessed at 8:35 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 8:53 P.M. and resumed the order of
the agenda at item 7.
4. PARKING REGULATIONS, RESIDENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM, METERS
ON UPPER PIER AVENUE, HOURS OF ENFORCEMENT. (Continued
from meetings of July 9, 1996 and August 13, 1996.)
Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated August
22, 1996. Supplemental letter from Ron Felsing, 247
27th Street, received September 23, 1996, and
supplemental resolution for adoption.
City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at 7:59 P.M. Coming forward to
address the Council on this item were:
Shirley Cassell - Hermosa Beach, said that she feels
that people who live elsewhere in the City
should be allowed to purchase parking permits
if they wish; but, she said that people who
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9232
come into the City from other areas should pay
and park in the public lots;
Mark Leuger - Van Horne, said he wrote the letter
urging the City to allow all residents to
purchase parking permits; said that he did not
feel it was right to create different classes
of citizens within the community;
Don Falkenstien - Palm Drive, said the City had to
protect the residents who live in the impacted
areas; said the area for a three block radius
around the downtown should be parking' for
residents only; said the current parking policy
caused visitors to park in residential areas
because it was so much less expensive; said it
cost $2.50 per hour to park in the City lots,
$.50 per hour to park at the meters and there
was no charge to park on Manhattan Avenue; and,
Scott Witherspoon - 414 Second Street, felt that
residents who do not live in the impacted zones
should not be allowed to purchase parking
permits; said that parking maximum should be
longer than two hours in the downtown area,
especially at night.
The public hearing closed at 8:08 P.M.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) adopt Resolution No. 96-5832, entitled, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL WITH THE
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION REGARDING CHANGES TO
PARKING REGULATIONS."; and,
2) approve the following changes:
a) enforcement hours from 10:00 A.M. to 10:00
P.M., seven days a week, year-round in the
Residential Permit Area;
b) eliminate the prohibition for parking without a
permit from 2:00 A.M. to 6:00 A.M.;
c) enforcement hours from 10:00 A.M. to 12:00
midnight, seven days a week, year-round in the
yellow meter zones;
d) enforcement hours from 10:00 A.M. to 12:00
midnight, seven days a week, year-round in the
silver meter zones with a maximum stay of two
hours; and,
e) add silver meters on Pier Avenue from Manhattan
Avenue to Valley Drive that would conform to
the silver meter enforcement hours with a
maximum stay of two hours.
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried,
noting the dissenting vote of Benz and the absence of
Edgerton.
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9233
Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council,
that staff explore the possibility of making parking
permits available to all residents.
After discussion of tickets being given while vehicles
were being unloaded and parallel parking spaces marked
too small for larger vehicles on Monterey Boulevard,
Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council,
that staff provide a pamphlet on "How to Park in Hermosa"
that would be available in the Finance/ Cashiers Office
and various other places.
5. LOWER PIER AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. Memorandum from
City Manager Stephen Burrell dated September 19, 1996.
City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and
responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at 8:20 P.M. Seeing no one come
forward to address the Council on this item, the public
hearing closed at 8:20 P.M.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to accept
the public testimony and continue the public hearing to
the Regular Meeting of October 22, 1996.
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
6. TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING HEIGHT/GRADE DEFINITION.
Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol
Blumenfeld dated September 16, 1996. Supplemental
ordinance for introduction and waiver of full reading.
Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the
staff report and responded to Council questions.
The public hearing opened at 8:22 P.M. Seeing no one come
forward to address the Council on this item, the public
hearing closed at 8:22 P.M.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to introduce
and waive full reading of Ordinance No. 96-1163,
entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION
17.04.040, MODIFYING THE DEFINITION AND METHOD FOR
DETERMINING BUILDING HEIGHT AND GRADE."
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler.
AYES: Benz, Bowler, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
NOES: None
ABSENT: Edgerton
At the hour of 8:24 P.M. the order of the agenda was returned
to item 3 to hear item 1(e).
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9234
MUNICIPAL MATTERS
7. ARTS HERMOSA/FirstNIGHT EVENT APPROVAL AND WAIVERS.
Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney
dated September 16, 1996. Supplemental information
received September 24, 1996.
Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff
report, responded to Council questions and said that the
waiver of the banner fee and the reduction of public
safety personnel costs to only the amount for actual
hours (without overhead costs) for the personnel over
those needed for a normal New Year's Eve would be
included in the contract.
Public participation opened at 8:54 P.M. Coming Forward to
address the Council on this item were:
Bill Dougherty - President of Arts Hermosa, thanked
the Council for past support; explained the
difficulty for an Arts organization to enroll
corporate sponsorship when there were no large
corporations within the community; said that in
these economic times charitable donations went
primarily to organizations providing health and
shelter relief; asked that the Council waive
all fees for the event including City staff
time; and responded to Council questions;
Shirley Cassell - Hermosa Beach, spoke in opposition
to funding ARTS HERMOSA/firstNIGHT event; said
that they were not asking for $5,000 but closer
to $20,000 and it was foolish for the Council
to spend this money as there would only be more
organizations standing in line for taxpayer
money;
John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, spoke in favor of
firstNight; said this was a great event for
Hermosa;
Dean Nota - Chairperson, Downtown Business Area
Enhancement District Commission, expressed
unqualified support for the firstNIGHT event;
said it received support not only from
residents but also from businesses; said many
downtown owners said they did exceptional
business during the event; questioned why the
Council did not utilize the event fee from the
Fiesta to pay for this;
Jerry Newton - Chamber of Commerce President, said
that when the Chamber had agreed to a five year
contract and payment of event fees for the
Fiestas, they felt that this money would go to
subsidize this type of event; said that the
Chamber had paid $17,000 in event fees this
year.
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9235
Public participation closed at 9:29 P.M.
City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions and
said that it was not necessary for Council to trace the
accounting procedure for the special event fees if the
Council wished to approve the funding requests.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) Approve the street closure request from Arts Hermosa
for December 31, 1996 - January 1, 1997, subject to
conditions in contract;
2) Approve the funding request for $5,000;
3) Approve an $1,800 allocation from Proposition A
Funds to be used for event shuttle bus services;
4) Approve the fee waiver requests and reductions as
indicated in analysis; and,
5) to include the waiver of the banner fee and the
reduction of public safety personnel costs to only
the amount for actual hours (without overhead costs)
for the personnel over those needed for a normal New
Year's Eve.
Motion Reviczky, second Benz. The motion carried, noting
the absence of Edgerton
Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council,
that event fees be a separate item in the next fiscal
year budget.
8. REQUESTS FOR CONTRIBUTIONS FOR FirstNIGHT 1997 AND THE
PROPOSED HERMOSA BEACH FILM FESTIVAL. Memorandum from
Dean Nota, Chairman, Downtown Business Area Enhancement
District Commission and Community Development Director
Sol Blumenfeld dated September 16, 1996. Supplemental
information provided September 24, 1996.
Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the
staff report and responded to Council questions.
Public participation opened at 9:38 P.M.
Robert Aronoff - 124 Strand, Parks, Recreation and
Community Resources Advisory Commission,
responded to Council questions; said the Film
Festival Committee knew of the renovation
schedule for the downtown area and did not see
a problem; said the downtown area and the
entire City would benefit from the activities
during the Film Festival; said the committee
had worked hard determining costs and possible
venues and hoped to have a surplus at the end
of the Festival.
Public participation closed at 9:59 P.M.
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9236
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to:
1) contribute $5,000 as seed money for the proposed
Film Festival to be held in April, 1997; and,
2) to add the condition that the $5,000 be returned to
the City if the Festival shows a profit.
Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting
the absence of Edgerton.
9. CLARK FIELD MASTER PLAN: PARKING AND ENTRYWAY.
Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated
September 18, 1996.
Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report
and responded to Council questions.
Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct
staff to proceed with the restriping of the parking lot
at Clark Field and create a new exit on Eleventh Street .
Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
Final Action: To approve the removal of at least two
planters across Valley Drive in the Greenbelt.
Motion Bowler, second Benz. The motion carried, noting
the dissenting vote of Reviczky and the absence of
Edgerton.
10. 321 PIER AVENUE - APPEAL OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING
DESIGNATION PURSUANT TO CITY ORDINANCE - SEISMIC
STRENGTHENING OF BUILDINGS HAVING UNREINFORCED MASONRY
BEARING WALLS. Memorandum from Community Development
Director Sol Blumenfeld dated September 18, 1996.
This item was removed from the agenda prior to the meeting and
continued to a future meeting.
11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER
a. ORAL REPORT CONCERNING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING
STRUCTURE.
City Manager Burrell presented the oral report and said
that he believed that the proposal had been accepted.
Action: There was no action taken.
12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL
a. DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE FOR THE
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE.
Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated
September 17, 1996.
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9237
City Manager Burrell presented the oral report and
responded to Council questions.
Action: To appoint Councilmember Benz as the voting
delegate and Councilmember Edgerton as the alternate for
the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting
on Tuesday, October 15, 1996.
Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried,
noting the absence of Edgerton.
13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Coming forward to address the Council at this time were:
Scott Witherspoon - 414 Second Street, said that he
thought a "How to Park in Hermosa Beach"
pamphlet was a good idea and asked if it could
be included in the Community Resources
quarterly activity mailer; said the film
festival was a great idea; and, asked that more
detail be included in the COPS funding request
list for the future meeting; and,
John Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, said that he was
against the COPS request.
Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council, that
staff include the proposed parking pamphlet in the City
mailer.
ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN
CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS:
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL:
a) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) (3) (E) ,
Anticipated Litigation:
A point has been reached where, in the opinion of
the City Council on the advice of its legal counsel,
based on the below -described existing facts and
circumstances, there is a significant exposure to
litigation against the City Council.
Number of potential cases: 1
Statement made by Mr. Trott outside an open meeting
of City regarding a threat of litigation and a
record of the statement made by the City's special
labor counsel, Richard Kreisler.
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9238
ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, September 24,
1996, at the hour of 10:15 P.M. to a closed session. The
closed session convened at the hour of 10:20 P.M. At the hour
of 11:00 P.M. the closed session adjourned to the Regular
Meeting
ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS - There were no decisions made requiring a
public announcement.
ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, September 24, 1996
at the hour of 11:01 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday,
November 12, 1996 at the hour of 7:10 P.M.
/)
Deputy Ci y Clerk
City Council Minutes 09-24-96 Page 9239
VOUCHRE2
10/01/96 08:12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
8210 10/01/96 007513 ADI
8211 10/01/96 000003 ADVANCE ELEVATOR
8212 10/01/96 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS
8213 10/01/96 003209 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TIME LAPSE VIDEO RECORDER
ELEVATOR SERVICE SEPT.'96
RADIO REPAIR/FIRE DEPT.
CELL PHONE REPAIR/PW
CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES AUG'96
CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES AUG'96
8214 10/01/96 005221 ALL POINTS MAINTENANCE PIER MAINT. AUG.'96
8215 10/01/96 005270 ALLTECH ELECTRONICS
N 8216 10/01/96 004971 ALTEC INDUSTRIES
8217 10/01/96 003423 AT & T
8218 10/01/96 005179 AT&T
8219 10/01/96 004277 OLIN BELL
COMPUTER PARTS AUG.'96
HIGH LIFT TRUCK REPAIR
CELL PHONE LNG DISTANCE AUG'96
CELL PHONE LONG DIST AUG'96
LONG DISTANCE CHARGES
LONG DISTANCE CHARGES AUG'96
LONG DISTANCE CHARGES AUG'96
LONG DIS CHGS/AUG 96
LONG DIS CHGS/AUG 96
LONG DIST CHGS/AUG 96
LONG DIST CHGS/AUG 96
SUMMER CAMP INSTRUCTOR
8220 10/01/96 006966 BLACKSTAR OIL COMPANY WASTE OIL REMOVAL
8221 10/01/96 006409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS ASPHALT PURCHASES/AUG 96
8222 10/01/96 001983 OFCR DAVID BOHACIK
MEALS/MOTORCYCLE SCHOOL
8223 10/01/96 006170 BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY RECODIFICATION OF CITY CODE
8224 10/01/96 007598 MONOKA BRINSON
REFUND PARKING CITATION
8225 10/01/96 005950 CALIFORNIA EMS AUTHORIT RE -CERT FEES/HAWKINS & KLEIN
8226 10/01/96 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT STREET SWEEPING AUG.'96
8227 10/01/96 000957 TERRY CHARLES
REIMB PATROL CAR EXPENSE
8228 10/01/96 000354 COAST IRRIGATION CO. IRRIGATION SUPPLY
IRRIGATION SUPPLY AUG.'96
IRRIGATION SUPPLY AUG.'96
IRRIGATION SUPPLY AUG.'96
8229 10/01/96 004029 DAMES & MOORE GEOTECH INVESTIGATION/PUB WRK
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2101-5401
001-4204-4201
001-2201-4309
001-4202-4305
001-4202-4304
001-2201-4304
001-3104-4201
001-1206-4305
105-2601-4309
001-2101-4304
001-2201-4304
001-2101-4304
001-4202-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2201-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-4601-4221
715-4206-4201
001-3104-4309
001-2101-4312
001-1121-4201
110-3302
001-2201-4315
001-3104-4201
715-2101-4311
001-4202-4309
001-4202-4309
001-4202-4309
001-4202-4309
160-8408-4201
ITEM
AMOUNT
705.74
100.00
131.33
33.77
26.17
1.41
825.00
199.00
5,275.23
.33
.95
10.00
10.02
10.00
27.19
5.00
5.00
5.32
210.00
50.00
30.61
240.00
15,446.89
30.00
250.00
9,600.00
111.89
240.50
283.51
273.14
280.31
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
705.74
100.00
131.33
61.35
825.00
199.00
5,275.23
1.28
72.53
210.00
50.00
30.61
240.00
15,446.89
30.00
250.00
9,600.00
111.89
1,077.46
5,000.00 5,000.00
111
VOUCHRE2
10/01/96 08:12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
8230 10/01/96 004689 DATA TICKET, INC.
8231 10/01/96 000154
8232 10/01/96 000267
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL
DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL
DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA SHELTER COSTS AUG.'96
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT HWY MAINTENANCE JUL'96
8233 10/01/96 000147 THE DEVELOPMENT
8234 10/01/96 007601 MARY DOMBO
8235 10/01/96 000165
EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO P
8236 10/01/96 007618 HARRY EMERY
8237 10/01/96 007596 ROBERT FIORITO
8238 10/01/96 004685
FIRST CHOICE FIRE PROTE
8239 10/01/96 003084 GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE
8240 10/01/96 000015
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO
FILM DEVELOPING SEPT.'96
REFUND PARKING CITATION
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
AUTO PARTS/AUG.'96
SUMMER CLASS REFUND
REFUND PARKING CITATION
ANNUAL SERV. -FIRE EXTINGUISHER
TUITION/N. STRATIS
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
8241 10/01/96 000946 HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY 4X6 SUCTION HOSE/PUB WORKS
8242 10/01/96 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. BLDG INSP/8-19 TO 8-29
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
110-1204-4201
110-1204-4201
110-3302-4251
105-2601-4251
001-2101-4305
110-3302
715-4202-4311
715-4202-4311
715-4206-4309
715-4206-4310
715-4206-4311
715-2601-4311
715-3104-4311
715-4201-4311
715-2201-4311
715-3302-4311
715-2101-4311
001-2111
110-3302
001-4204-4321
001-2101-4312
001-2201-4304
110-3302-4304
001-2101-4304
001-1206-4304
001-1206-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-4601-4304
001-2101-4304
001-1206-4304
001-4601-4304
001-1206-4304
001-4201-4304
160-3102-4309
ITEM
AMOUNT
94.78
4.55
651.31
490.31
64.04
20.00
122.57
39.83
124.66
50.47
119.52
59.20
242.18
50.97
37.74
114.60
95.70
33.00
20.00
445.50
56.00
89.47
91.00
44.05
85.22
88.18
44.05
45.45
87.06
85.22
63.25
66.21
26.66
33.86
42.16
64.18
37.72
243.30
001-4201-4201 2,640.00
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
99.33
651.31
490.31
64.04
20.00
1,057.44
33.00
20.00
445.50
56.00
993.74
243.30
2,640.00
VOUCHRE2
10/01/96 08:12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
8243 10/01/96 004108 HAZELRIGG RISK MGMT SER WORKER'S COMP ADMIN/OCT-DEC'96
8244 10/01/96 004075 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WORKERS COMP CLAIMS SEPT.'96
8245 10/01/96 003131 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS SALES TAX SERVICE/JULY-SEPT 96
8246 10/01/96 007605 HOFFER ELECTRIC REFUND CONTRACTOR'S PERMIT
8247 10/01/96 005254 INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP COMPUTER EQUIP MAINT SEPT'96
COMPUTER EQUIP MAINT SEPT'96
MAC PC MAINT SEPT'96
8248 10/01/96 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE STRAND LIGHTS
STRAND LIGHTS
BALLAST KIT/HERMOSA AVE.
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
DISCOUNTS TAKEN
BALLAST KIT/HERMOSA AVE.
DISCOUNT OFFERED
DISCOUNT TAKEN
STREET LIGHTS/PCH
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
DISCOUNTS TAKEN
STREET LAMPS/HERMOSA AVE
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
DISCOUNTS TAKEN
BALLAST KIT/HERMOSA AVE.
DISCOUNT OFFERED
DISCOUNT TAKEN
WIRE CONNECTORS/DISASTER HQ.
8249 10/01/96 006140 INSTASHRED SECURITY SER SHREDDING SERV/AUG.'96
8250 10/01/96 003373 RUSSELL WALTER JOHNSON
8251 10/01/96 007606 KAREN KAHN
8252 10/01/96 005908 ERIC LAWRENCE
OVER -THE -LINE TOURNEY DIR.
REFUND PARKING CITATION
REFUND PARKING CITATION
8253 10/01/96 002175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIE LEGAL SERV/ADMIN.INVESTIGATION
8254 10/01/96 007600 BETH LIPPES
8255 10/01/96 001006 JAMES H. LISSNER
8256 10/01/96 007616 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
REFUND PARKING CITATION
REFUND WITNESS FEES
BUS PASS SALES JUL'96
8257 10/01/96 000079 LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. BOOTS/V.BR000OLIERI
8258 10/01/96 007595 KEITH LUPTON REFUND CITATION OVERPAYMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
705-1217-4201
705-1217-4324
001-1202-4201
110-3850
001-2101-4201
001-2201-4201
001-2101-4201
105-2601-4309
105-2601-4309
105-2601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
105-2601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
105-2601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
105-2601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
105-2601-4309
001-2021
001-2022
001-4204-4309
001-2101-4201
001-4601-4221
110-3302
110-3302
001-1203-4201
110-3302
001-3818
145-3403-4251
001-2201-4187
110-3302
ITEM
AMOUNT
8,820.00
22,869.33
938.40
16.00
457.80
305.20
201.00
294.31
294.31
211.44
4.31
4.31-
211.44
4.31
4.31-
264.68
5.40
5.40-
270.09
5.51
5.51-
211.44
4.31
4.31-
51.31
56.00
168.00
30.00
17.00
778.75
20.00
300.00
378.00
162.38
50.00
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
8,820.00
22,869.33
938.40
16.00
964.00
1,809.02
56.00
168.00
30.00
17.00
778.75
20.00
300.00
378.00
162.38
50.00
VOUCHRE2
10/01/96 08:12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
8259 10/01/96 000605 MANHATTAN FORD
8260 10/01/96 001494 NATIONAL EMBLEM
8261 10/01/96 002514 OFFICE DEPOT
8262 10/01/96 000093 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
DEALER AUTO PARTS SEPT'96
EMBLEMS, FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES AUG.'96
OFFICE SUPPLIES AUG.'96
BODY WORK COMM SERV VEHICLE
BODY WORK COMM RES VEHICLE
BODY WORK COMM RES VEHICLE
8263 10/01/96 000321 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPUTER HOOK UPS AUG'96
COMPUTER HOOK UPS AUG'96
COMPUTER HOOK UPS/AUG'96
8264 10/01/96 001658 PADGETT-THOMPSON
8265 10/01/96 002487 PAGENET
8266 10/01/96 001834 PATRICK & CO.
8267 10/01/96 007158 PEEK TRAFFIC SIGNAL
8268 10/01/96 007515 PULLTARPS MFG.
8269 10/01/96 007603 BARBARA C. ROSS
8270 10/01/96 007613 SAN BERNARDINO HOTEL
SEMINAR TUITION/M. HALL
PAGING SERVICE SEPT.'96
PAGING SERVICE SEPT.'96
PAGING SERVICE SEPT.'96
PAGING SERVICE SEPT.'96
PAGING SERVICE SEPT.'96
PAGING SERVICE SEPT.'96
PAGING SERVICE SEPT.'96
PAGING SERVICE SEPT.'96
PAGING SERVICE SEPT.'96
DOGS LICENSE TAGS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
715-4201-4311
001-2201-4187
001-4201-4201
001-2101-4305
715-3302-4311
715-4601-4311
715-2101-4311
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
110-1204-4317
001-2101-4201
001-2201-4201
001-2201-4201
001-1201-4201
001-1203-4201
110-3302-4201
001-4601-4201
001-4202-4201
001-1206-4201
110-1204-4305
REPAIR SIGNAL/AVIATION&PROSPEC 160-3102-4309
ASPHALT TARP
ASSESSMENT REBATE
LODGING/D. BOHACIK
8271 10/01/96 004595 SAN BERNARDINO SHERIFF' TUIT.& CYCLE RENTAL/D.BOHACIK
8272 10/01/96 007602 JOHN SEYMOUR
8273 10/01/96 007597 CHRISTOPHER SHOCH
8274 10/01/96 007594 CHARLES SIKLEY
ASSESSMENT REBATE
REFUND PARKING CITATION
REFUND CITATION OVERPAYMENT
8275 10/01/96 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP CLEANING SUPPLIES/AUG.'96
CLEANING SUPPLIES SEPT'96
8276 10/01/96 000159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI ELECTRIC BILL AUG'96
ELECTRIC BILL AUG'96
001-3104-4309
105-3105
001-2101-4312
001-2101-4317
105-3105
110-3302
110-3302
001-2201-4309
001-2201-4309
105-2601-4303
001-4202-4303
ITEM
AMOUNT
106.54
840.35
21.51
79.73
968.45
1,185.14
491.18
7.28
125.98
61.09
139.00
195.50
50.00
14.15-
11.50
11.50
11.50
34.50
218.50
11.50
273.03
95.00
1,146.66
37.98
528.00
500.00
37.98
30.00
20.00
44.07
98.50
18.19
14.88
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
106.54
840.35
101.24
2,644.77
194.35
139.00
530.35
273.03
95.00
1,146.66
37.98
528.00
500.00
37.98
30.00
20.00
142.57
33.07
VOUCHRE2
10/01/96 08:12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
8277 10/01/96 000170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS GAS BILLING AUG'96
GAS BILLING AUG'96
GAS BILLING AUG'96
8278 10/01/96 000364 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
8279 10/01/96 003749 TAKATA NURSERY
8280 10/01/96 000841 CITY OF TORRANCE
8281 10/01/96 003665 MONICA TUNWAR
8282 10/01/96 007580 UNIFORM EXPRESS
8283 10/01/96 007599 ARADA UNURUTDHIKORN
FINGERPRINT APPS AUG'96
PLANTS/MEDIANS
ANNUAL DUES/POLICE
REIMBURSE TUITION/M. TUNWAR
BALLISTIC VESTS/POLICE DEPT.
REFUND PARKING CITATION
8284 10/01/96 004768 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE PRINTER MAINTENANCE OCT'96
8285 10/01/96 003353 VISA
AUG 96 EXP/V. STRASER
AUG'96 EXP/CITY MANAGER
8286 10/01/96 000131 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT STREET SIGN PARTS
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-4204-4303
001-4204-4303
001-4204-4303
001-2101-4251
105-2601-4309
001-2101-4317
001-2101-4317
001-2101-4187
110-3302
001-1206-4201
001-2101-4317
001-1201-4317
001-3104-4309
ITEM
AMOUNT
39.14
43.09
22.65
232.00
244.86
175.00
513.23
13,999.43
20.00
211.00
86.11
663.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
104.88
232.00
244.86
175.00
513.23
13,999.43
20.00
211.00
749.11
79.39 79.39
107,338.95
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
10/01/96 08:12 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 56,562.25
105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 7,862.26
110 PARKING FUND 1,538.17
145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 378.00
160 SEWER FUND 5,338.30
705 INSURANCE FUND 31,689.33
715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,970.64
TOTAL 107,338.95
PAGE 6
VOUCHRE2
10/01/96 08:12
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS
LISTED ON PAAGfS / TO J- INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER
FOR /0(1/v ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET.
BY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
DATE /1)11/010
PAGE 7
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 12:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
8204 09/23/96 007609 KELLY J. DALE REPLACEMENT CHECK 001-2034 967.00 967.00
TOTAL CHECKS 967.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 12:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 967.00
TOTAL 967,00
PAGE 2
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 12:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS
LISTED ONAGES / TO \ INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER
FOR 41.R8/4&— ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET.
BY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
DATE
PAGE 3
VOUCHRE2
09/25/96 17:46
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
8206 09/25/96 006230 ADVANCED CONSTRUCTION FINAL RETENTION FOR S. PARK 125-2020 25,402.81 25,402.81
8207 09/25/96 007615 CSU LONG BEACH TUITION/T.BOHLIN 001-2101-4312 202.00 202.00
8208 09/25/96 001418 CHARLES H. LEWIS ADVANCED DISAB. PMT/C.LEWIS 001-2101-4180 2,170.00 2,170.00
8209 09/25/96 007614 WINDSOR SUITES HOTEL LODGING/T. BOHLIN 001-2101-4312 139.52 139.52
TOTAL CHECKS 27,914.33
VOUCHRE2
09/25/96 17:46
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 2,511.52
125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 25,402.81
TOTAL 27,914.33
PAGE 2
VOUCHRE2
09/25/96 17:46
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS
LISTED ON PAGES I TO \ INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER
FOR CASI�%(p ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET.
BY
FINANNCE DIRECTOR_
DATE r /2S/,7Y�
PAGE 3
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
8205 09/23/96 007593 A.I.A. LOS ANGELES BLDG.INSPCTR.SEMINAR/C.SWARTZ 001-4201-4317 125.00 125.00
TOTAL CHECKS 125.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 125.00
TOTAL 125.00
PAGE 2
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 15:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THk DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS
LISTED ON PAGES TO ` INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER
FOR dP/Aat ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET.
BY t
FINANCE DIRECTOR
DATE 9b 9�v
PAGE 3
VOUCHRE2
09/23/96 10:51
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
8197 09/23/96 007579 AIR VIEWS
8198 09/23/96 004928 COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FO
8199 09/23/96 000010 FRANKSON'S,INC.
8200 09/23/96 007573 LAMPLIGHTER INN
8201 09/23/96 005107 OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVI
8202 09/23/96 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
DOWNTOWN AERIAL PHOTOS 001-4101-4201 543.75
LIABILITY CLAIMS/AUG'96 705-1209-4324 9,317.75
VENETIOU SETTLEMENT 705-1209-4324 399.89
GRAISON GILL SETTLEMENT 705-1209-4324 3,118.00
MARK GILL SETTLEMENT 705-1209-4324 1,800.00
DAVIDSON SETTLEMENT 705-1209-4324 173.50
VISTA DEL SOL SETTLEMENT 705-1209-4324 163.75
PARTS FOR GO -4 715-3302-4311 21.03
HOTEL ADV./V. ELLEDGE 001-2101-4317 308.00
300' NOTICING/09/5/96 001-4101-4201 465.50
001-2020 20.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-4201-4317 12.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 110-1204-4305 27.34
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-2101-4312 47.35
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-2201-4309 .70
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-2201-4305 85.04
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-2101-4305 118.05
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 715-3302-4310 20.61
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-1203-4305 53.76
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-1203-4201 20.78
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-4101-4305 9.73
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-4202-4309 20.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-4202-4309 44.59
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-4601-4308 119.81
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-4601-4305 14.00
PETTY CASH/7-11,TO 9-12-96 001-4601-4221 26.06
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-1121-4305 29.23
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-1206-4309 12.73
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-1206-4305 66.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-2101-4317 40.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 715-4206-4311 13.38
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-1202-4317 22.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 715-3302-4311 21.20
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-2201-4187 45.95
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-2201-4309 31.42
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-4202-4317 56.40
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 705-1209-4324 12.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 715-4601-4310 3.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
543.75
14,972.89
21.03.
308.00
465.50
993.13
TOTAL CHECKS 17,304.30
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 10:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 2,212.85
110 PARKING FUND 27.34
705 INSURANCE FUND 14,984.89
715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 79.22
TOTAL 17,304.30
PAGE 2
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 10:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS
LISTED ONe GES, TO INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER
FOR AR ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET.
BY C
FINANCE IRECTO�R
DATE �4 0
PAGE 3
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 09:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
---> VOID CHECKS
CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS
008154 VOID
008196 VOID
PAGE 1
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 09:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 2
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
8133 09/23/96 007579 AIR RUSH DOWNTOWN AERIAL PHOTOS 001-4101-4201 543.75 543.75
8134 09/12/96 000152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE UTILITY RAGS/AUG.'96 001-2201-4309 25.00
UTILITY RUGS.AUG'96 001-2201-4309 25.00 50.00
8135 09/23/96 005179 AT&T
LONG DIST CHGS/AUG 96 001-1206-4304 5.45
FAX/LONG DIST/AUG 96 001-4202-4304 6.90
FAX/LONG DIST/AUG 96 001-4202-4304 5.45
FAX/LONG DIST/AUG 96 001-4201-4304 7.07
LONG DIST CHGS/AUG 96 001-4204-4321 5.00
8136 09/23/96 000407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY REPAIR SECURITY GATE
KEYS / POLICE JUL.'96
8137 09/23/96 004277 OLIN BELL SUMMER CAMP INSTRUCTOR
29.87
001-2101-4309 167.11
001-2101-4309 1.35 168.46
001-4601-4221 490.00 490.00
8138 09/23/96 006409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS ASPHALT PURCHASES/AUG 96 001-3104-4309 87.97
ASPHSLT PURCHASES/AUG 96 001-3104-4309 58.75 146.72
8139 09/23/96 000389 CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPM TYPEWRITER RIBBONS/POLICE 001-2101-4305 45.21 45.21
8140 09/23/96 000014 CHAMPION CHEVROLET
8141 09/23/96 006838 PEGGY CHASE
8142 09/23/96 000153 CINTAS CORPORATION
DEALER AUTO PARTS AUG.'96 715-2101-4311 98.70
DEALER AUTO PARTS AUG.'96 715-4206-4309 100.67 199.37
SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 241.00 241.00
UNIFORM RENTALS AUG.'96 001-4202-4187 91.07
UNIFORM RENTALS AUG.'96 110-3302-4187 5.52
UNIFORMS RENTALS AUG.'96 001-4202-4187 91.07
UNIFORMS RENTALS AUG.'96 110-3302-4187 5.52
UNIFORM RENTALS AUG.'96 001-4202-4187 91.07
UNIFORM RENTALS AUG.'96 110-3302-4187 5.52
UNIFORM RENTALS AUG.'96 001-4202-4187 91.07
UNIFORM RENTALS AUG.'96 110-3302-4187 5.52
386.36
8143 09/23/96 004715 COLEN AND LEE LIABILITY CLAIMS/AUG'96 705-1209-4324 9,317.75
VENETIOU SETTLEMENT 705-1209-4324 399.89
GRAISON GILL SETTLEMENT 705-1209-4324 3,118.00
MARK GILL SETTLEMENT 705-1209-4324 1,800.00
DAVIDSON SETTLEMENT 705-1209-4324 173.50
VISTA DEL SOL SETTLEMENT 705-1209-4324 163.75 14,972.89
8144 09/23/96 005770 COMP USA BACKUP CARTRIDGES 001-1206-4309 227.52 227.52
8145 09/23/96 000850 L. N. CURTIS UNIFORM EXP/ FIRE DEPT 001-2201-4187 33.57 33.57
8146 09/23/96 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL FILM PURCHASES/ AUG 96 001-2101-4305 141.27 141.27
8147 09/23/96 005509 RICK ESCALANTE SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 357.00 357.00
8148 09/23/96 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVIV AUG/96 001-4204-4201 5,380.00 5,380.00
VOUCHRE2
09/23/96 09:10
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
8149 09/23/96 007577 FIRE ENGINEERING
8150 09/23/96 004993 FISHER SCIENTIFIC
8151 09/23/96 000010 FRANKSON'S,INC.
8152 09/23/96 006639 JANET GROSSMAN
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL / FIRE
SAFETY EQUIPMENT PARTS
GASKETS/FILTERS
SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR
REIMB FINGER PRINT EXP.
8153 09/23/96 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHGS/AUG 96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
FAX CHARGES/DET.OFFICE AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES/AUG 96
TELEPHONE CHGS/AUG 96
TELEPHONE CHGS/AUG 96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
TELEPHONE CHARGES AUG'96
8155 09/23/96 001340 GTEL
PHONE CHANGES/FIRE DEPT
8156 09/23/96 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. BLDG INSP/8/5-8/15/96
8157 09/23/96 004075 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS/8/30/96
8158 09/23/96 003055 ICBO
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
8159 09/23/96 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE ELEC SUPPLIES/AUG 96
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2201-4315
001-2201-4309
715-3302-4311
001-4601-4221
001-2101-4251
001-4601-4304
001-4204-4321
001-4601-4304
110-3302-4304
001-1101-4304
001-1121-4304
001-1131-4304
001-1132-4304
001-1141-4304
001-1201-4304
001-1202-4304
001-1203-4304
001-1206-4304
001-1208-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2201-4304
109-3301-4304
110-1204-4304
110-3302-4304
001-4101-4304
001-4201-4304
001-4202-4304
001-4601-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2201-4304
001-2101-4304
001-4202-4304
001-4601-4304
001-2101-4304
001-2201-4304
001-2201-4304
001-4201-4201
705-1217-4324
001-2201-4315
001-4204-4309
ITEM
AMOUNT
19.95
255.06
21.03
235.20
10.00
69.73
44.75
89.55
67.11
10.28
21.84
11.56
10.28
21.84
21.84
65.53
33.41
33.41
11.56
516.48
77.09
16.65
77.09
75.80
48.88
65.53
132.34
33.41
26.22
27.12
65.38
406.22
69.76
28.51
83.96
146.36
390.00
2,640.00
1,740.92
32.48
32.80
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
19.95
255.06
21.03
245.20
2,409.49
390.00
2,640.00
1,740.92
32.48
32.80
VOUCHRE2
09/23/96 09:10
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 4
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
8160 09/23/96 007578 INSTITUTE OF HEARTHMATH SEMINAR MATERIALS 001-1203-4317 3,260.00 3,260.00
8161 09/23/96 007406 J.E. SHULL & SON SIGNS FOR AVIATION/PROSPECT/PW 105-2601-4309 1,909.53 1,909.53
8162 09/23/96 007576 CATHERINE KASPER CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 110-3302 352.00 352.00
8163 09/23/96 001032 JOHN KEARIN REIMB TRAVEL EXPENSE 001-2101-4317 245.21 245.21
8164 09/23/96 007407 KEYSTONE UNIFORM CENTER UNIFORM/FIRE 001-2201-4187 5,055.49 5,055.49
8165 09/23/96 002833 STAN KIM SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 001-4601-4221 189.00 189.00
8166 09/23/96 007573 LAMPLIGHTER INN HOTEL ADV/V. ELLEDGE 001-2101-4317 330.00 330.00
8167 09/23/96 004303 LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. REDWOOD BARK 001-4202-4309 650.00
PARKS MAINT AUG'96 105-2601-4201 7,910.00 8,560.00
8168 09/23/96 003044 SHERRIA LAWRENCE REIMB BOOKS/FALL'96 001-4202-4317 168.11 168.11
8169 09/23/96 007114 LEASE GROUP RESOURCES COPIER LEASE PAYMENT/SEP 96 001-1208-6900 842.90 842.90
8170 09/23/96 007575 ISAAC LEVY ASSESSMENT REBATE 105-3105 37.98 37.98
8171 09/23/96 001255 MANERI SIGN CO., INC. STRAND SIGN 001-3104-4309 256.34 256.34
8172 09/23/96 007581 SUSAN MANZO CITATION PMT REFUND 110-3302 20.00 20.00
8173 09/23/96 000522 KIM MITCHELL PER DIEM GANG TRNG CONF 001-2101-4317 100.00 100.00
8174 09/23/96 002953 MONSOON LAGOON WATER SL SUMMER CAMP TRIP
8175 09/23/96 007584 NAT. LAW ENFORCEMENT IN TUITION/KIM MITCHELL
001-4601-4201 346.50 346.50
001-2101-4317 150.00 150.00
8176 09/23/96 002514 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES/AUG 96 001-1208-4305 718.65
SHREDDER 001-1208-5401 404.58 1,123.23.
8177 09/23/96 000608 PEP BOYS FREON / PATROL CARS 715-2101-4311 432.99 432.99
8178 09/23/96 007514 PHYSIO -CONTROL CORPORAT PARTS/DEFIBRILLATOR
8179 09/23/96 000296 THE PRINT NETWORK ROLLER HOCKEY FLYERS
001-2201-4309 31.43 31.43
001-4601-4308 319.75 319.75
8180 09/23/96 001092 REDONDO MARINE HARDWARE EMERGENCY GENERATOR/POLICE 001-2101-5402 1,660.22 1,660.22
8181 09/23/96 003505 SHORELINE PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS/AMIRANI/BEHBOOD 001-4202-4305 86.60
POLICE FORMS 001-2101-4305 606.20 692.80
8182 09/23/96 006666 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC FINAL RETENTION/HERM AVE
8183 09/23/96 003377 G. SCOTT SMITH SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR
160-8408-4201 54,554.04 54,554.04
001-4601-4221 403.20 403.20
VOUCHRE2
09/23/96 09:10
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
8184 09/23/96 004778 SMOG EXPRESS
8185 09/23/96 004987 SMOG EXPRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SMOG CERTIFICATE
SMOG CERTIFICATE
8186 09/23/96 000442 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI STREET LIGHTING BILL AUG'96
STREET LIGHTING BILL AUG'96
STREET LIGHTING BILL AUG'96
8187 09/23/96 000146 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WAT DRINKING WATER AUG.'96
DRINKING WATER AUG.96
8188 09/23/96 000115 SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE C DOWNTOWN AREA MAINT AUG'96
8189 09/23/96 003480 SQUEEKERS & HERB
8190 09/23/96 007110 SHARLEEN TAIRA
8191 09/23/96 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE
8192 09/23/96 007574 CHRISTINE TRIESTE
8193 09/23/96 007580 UNIFORM EXPRESS
8194 09/23/96 005758 WILSON & ASSOCIATES
8195 09/23/96 007341 JOHN WORKMAN
SHIRTS/OVER LINE TOURNAMENT
SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR
REIMB. FINGERPRINT EXP
DISCOUNTS OFFERED
DISCOUNTS TAKEN
HARDWARE AUG'96
HARDWARE AUG'96
HARDWARE AUG'96
HARDWARE AUG'96
HARDWARE AUG'96
HARDWARE AUG'96
HARDWARE AUG'96
HARDWARE AUG'96
SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR
BALLISTIC VEST/MC COLGAN
BACKGROUND INVEST/AUG.'96
BACKGROUND INVEST. SEPT.'96
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
PETTY
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
CASH/7-11
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
TO 9-12-96
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
715-4206-4311
715-4202-4311
105-2601-4303
105-2601-4303
105-2601-4303
001-4601-4305
001-2201-4305
109-3301-4201
001-4601-4308
001-4601-4221
001-2101-4251
001-2021
001-2022
105-2601-4309
001-4202-4309
715-4206-4311
110-3302-4305
160-3102-4309
001-3104-4309
001-2201-4309
001-2201-4305
001-4601-4221
001-2101-4187
001-2101-4201
001-2101-4201
001-2020
001-4201-4317
110-1204-4305
001-2101-4312
001-2201-4309
001-2201-4305
001-2101-4305
715-3302-4310
001-1203-4305
001-1203-4201
001-4101-4305
001-4202-4309
001-4202-4309
001-4601-4308
001-4601-4305
ITEM
AMOUNT
25.00
25.00
7,115.01
117.47
1,290.02
42.18
11.00
4,615.00
92.50
94.50
10.00
125.43
125.43-
268.21
129.18
22.05
13.60
205.77
313.32
61.54
115.18
84.00
399.98
250.00
500.00
20.00
12.00
27.34
47.35
.70
85.04
118.05
20.61
53.76
20.78
9.73
20.00
44.59
119.81
14.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
25.00
25.00
8,522.50
53.18
4,615.00
92.50
104.50
1,128.85
84.00
399.98
750.00
VOUCHRE2
09/23/96 09:10
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 6
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-4601-4221 26.06
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-1121-4305 29.23
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-1206-4309 12.73
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-1206-4305 66.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-2101-4317 40.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 715-4206-4311 13.38
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-1202-4317 22.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 715-3302-4311 21.20
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-2201-4187 45.95
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-2201-4309 31.42
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 001-4202-4317 56.40
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 705-1209-4324 12.00
PETTY CASH/7-11 TO 9-12-96 715-4601-4310 3.00
993.13
TOTAL CHECKS 129,034.28
VOUCHRE2
09/23/96 09:10
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 32,830.14
105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 18,648.22
109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 4,631.65
110 PARKING FUND 655.02
160 SEWER FUND 54,759.81
705 INSURANCE FUND 16,725.81
715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 783.63
TOTAL 129,034.28
PAGE 7
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/23/96 09:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE,DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS
LISTED 0 PPAGG�E/ TO (0 INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER
FOR WASt*-- f ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET.
BY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
DATE /'7V
PAGE 8
VOUCHRE2
09/19/96 08:06
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
8131 09/19/96 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 001-1103 239,059.47
PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 105-1103 7,597.86
PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 109-1103 665.92
PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 110-1103 28,006.31
PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 117-1103 592.94
PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 140-1103 58.63
PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 145-1103 1,278.68
PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 152-1103 59.31
PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 160-1103 10,139.82
PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 705-1103 2,374.07
PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-96 715-1103 3,083.13 292,916.14
8132 09/19/96 000026 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMEN RETIREMENT/9-1 TO 9-15-96 001-2033 43,352.64
RETIREMENT/9-1 TO 9-15-96 105-2033 975.72
RETIREMENT/9-1 TO 9-15-96 109-2033 98.63
RETIREMENT/9-1 TO 9-15-96 110-2033 3,552.18
RETIREMENT/9-1 TO 9-15-96 117-2033 70.05
RETIREMENT/9-1 TO 9-15-96 140-2033 8.94
RETIREMENT/9-1 TO 9-15-96 160-2033 1,285.88
RETIREMENT/9-1 TO 9-15-96 705-2033 294.50
RETIREMENT/9-1 TO 9-15-96 715-2033 417.98
RETIREMENT/9-1 TO 9-15-96 001-3915 17,116.77- 32,939.75
TOTAL CHECKS 325,855.89
VOUCHRE2
09/19/96 08:06
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 265,295.34
105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 8,573.58
109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 764.55
110 PARKING FUND 31,558.49
117 AB939 FUND 662.99
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 67.57
145 PROPOSITION ,A FUND 1,278.68
152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 59.31
160 SEWER FUND 11,425.70
705 INSURANCE FUND 2,668.57
715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,501.11
TOTAL 325,855.89
PAGE 2
VOUCHRE2
09/19/96 08:06
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS
LISTED ON//,P,/AA��G S/- / / TO INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER
FOR 47//�q�p A E ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET.
BY
FINANCE'DIRECTOR
DATE q 1,0‘/
PAGE 3
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
09/18/96 09:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
8130 09/18/96 006699 VERSATILE COMMUNICATION DEPOSIT 1ST FLOOR REMODEL 001-4201-5602 1,447.50 1,447.50
TOTAL CHECKS 1,447.50
VOUCHRE2
09/18/96 09:32
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 1,447.50
TOTAL 1,447.50
PAGE 2
VOUCHRE2
09/18/96 09:32
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS
LISTED , IMES / TO INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER
y
FOR I 1� A E ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR
PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET.
BY
FINAN DIRECTOR
DATE 9%/t0/
PAGE 3
September 18, 1996
Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of
Members of the City Council October 8, 1996
CANCELLATION OF CHECKS
Please consider the following request for cancellation of the checks listed below.
#007371 - 07/02/96 -Joe Pawlak. $200.00 Check was never received. Check was lost in the mailed.
#007993 - 09/04/96 - Doubletree Hotel. $398.94 Class was canceled. Check was never mailed.
#007994 - 09/04/96 - Justice Training Institute. $416.00 Class was canceled. Check was never mailed
#007995 - 09/04/96 - Dean Menart. $176.00 Class was canceled. Check was never mailed.
Concur: A _A
Stephen R it City Manager Noted for $seal impact:
Viki Copeland, Finance Director
October 3, 1996
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of
October 8, 1996
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
................ .
October 22, 1996
Ordinance amending Municipal Code Section 12.20.120 -
Fireworks.
Fire Chief
Public Hearing: Lower Pier Avenue Assessment District
City Manager
Receive and file action minutes from Planning Commission meeting
of 10/15/96.
Community Development Director
Text amendment regarding revocation of CUPs
Community Development Director
Recommendation to deny claims
Risk Manager
Monthly Activity Reports - September, 1996
All Departments
NOTE: THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 1996 HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED
TO
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 141 1996
4th Quarter General Plan Amendment
Community Development Director
Text amendment to open space requirements in the R-1 zone to
allow up to a 10% margin for administrative decision in certain
justifiable cases on lots of 2100 sq. ft. or less, and study the policies
of other cities to determine the effect of a 10% O.S. requirement for
all R-1 lots.
Community Development Director
DEC request to change the authority for Class III & IV events
Community Development Director
Text amendment regarding fence height
Community Development Director
Receive and file action minutes from Parks, Recreation and
Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of 10/16/96.
Community Resouces Director
Recommendation to deny claims
Risk Manager
November 26 1996 ....:.........:...............
Receive and file action minutes from Planning Commission meeting
of 11/19/96.
Community Development Director
Hotel EIR final certification
Community Development Director
Staff report regarding regulation of newsracks
Community Development Director
Recommendation to deny claims
Risk Manager
Monthly Activity Reports - October, 1996
All Departments
1 c
4-
io -23 y-6
September 24, 1996
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council October 8, 1996
CITY FACILITIES ROOF REPAIRS
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Authorize the Director of Public Works to award a contract to West Roofing of Torrance,
California for roofing repairs. In the amount of $5,275.00 and to make minor adjustments
within the approved budget.
BACKGROUND:
Staff prepared specifications for repairing five (5) roofs on City owned facilities at the following
locations:
1. Community Center, North Wing
2. Community Center, Garage
3. 4th & Ardmore Bicentennial Park Building
4. City Yard - Mechanics Shop
5. City Yard - Animal Control Shed
The request for bids was advertised in the Easy Reader. A total of nine (9) packages were sent
out. On August 29, 1996, four bids received by the City Clerk's office were publicly opened and
read aloud.
ANALYSIS:
The bid for the roofing repairs are as follows:
BIDDER'S NAME
West Roofing
Bay Cities Roofing
Hillside Roofing & Construction
Best Roofing
AMOUNT OF BID
$ 5,275.00
$ 7,225.00
$ 8,275.00
$12,550.00
id
r
In summary, repairing these five roofs on City owned buildings will improve the image of
Hermosa Beach as well as reduce the future cost and liability to the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Contract Amount $5,275
*20% Contingency $1,055
Total $6,330
*The 20% contingency is needed for replacing damage lumber at $1.50 per lineal feet. The true
quantity is unknown until the roof(s) are uncovered.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Flaherty
Public Works Superintendent
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
srl.a.ccitems.reroof
Concur:
Amy Amirani
Public Works Director
Stephen rell
City Mana
Jcdt./Si/
September 30, 1996
Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of
the Hermosa Beach City Council October 8, 1996
RECOMMENDATION TO DENY CLAIMS
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council deny the following claims and refer them
to the City's Liability Claims Administrator.
1. Claimant : Miller, Holly
Date of Loss: 04/27/96
Date Filed : 09/24/96
Allegation : Alleges City failed to adequately have in place traffic
controls regulating traffic along Olympic torch route and
as a result was struck by vehicle while attempting to
cross street.
2. Claimant : Stern, Jillian
Date of Loss: 03/31/96
Date Filed : 09/30/96
Allegation : Alleges dangerous condition of Strand and negligence of
City employees created condition whereby claimant, while
roller blading, suffered injuries when struck by bicyclist.
A copy of the claims is available in the Office of the City Clerk for review.
In addition to the above, The City has received the following claims which have
been resolved.
1. Claimant : Vista del Sol Homeowner's Assn.
Date of Loss: 07/21/96
Date Filed : 08/20/96
Damage : Property damage caused by clog in main sewer line.
Disposition : City paid $ 163.75 of cost for clean up of impacted
property
le
2. Claimant : Venetiou, Alex
Date of Loss: 07/28/96
Date Filed : 08/05/96
Damage : Police vehicle backed into parked car.
Disposition : City paid $399.89 for repair of vehicle.
3. Claimant : Davidson, Wesley
Date of Loss: 08/29/96
Date Filed : 08/29/96
Damage : Vehicle damaged as result of traffic collision with parking
enforcement vehicle.
Disposition : Property damage claim settled for $3,726.50 (September
10, 1996 Closed Session Authorization)
Respectfully Submitted Concur:
Robert A. Blackwood
Risk Manager
cc: Bill Fuentes, Colen & Lee
mw/deny
Stephen R. Burrell
City Manager
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1°1
THEPOT & WEST
George O. West III, Esq (SBN) 158717
2650 West Temple Street
mos Angeles, CA 90026
213) 487-5530
Attorney for Claimant
HOLLY ANN MILLER
c281' Slot,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
HOLLY ANN MILLER CASE NO: Not Assigned
12
Claimant,
14 vs
1t CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
16Respondent,
1/
18r,
1
19-
20
21'
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
TO THE ABOVE NAMED RESPONDENTS :
NAME OF CLAIMANT :
HOLLY ANN MILLER
28 414 Second Street
Apt 304
24; Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
25 Age : 30 DOB 2/13/66
26'.`
NOTICES TO - BE SENT TO :
27
2
THEPOT & WEST
George O. West III, Esq
2650 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90026
(213) 487-5530
!ATE, TIME AND PLACE OF INJURY
The injury occurred on April 27, 1996 at approximately 11:00
m. on Hermosa Avenue at or near Second Street in the City of
ermosa Beach.
iESCRIPTION OF INJURY :
The injury occurred when Claimant, was proceeding across
11 ermosa Avenue when she was struck by an on coming vehicle during
1l he Olympic torch run. The city failed to adequately have in
t2 lace any traffic controls regulating traffic down the torch
18 oute.
14
1t NJURIES :
��
1
Broken fibula, several stitches, multiple bruises,
17
1$
11' EDICAL CARE :
acerations, and contusions about the Claimant's body.
Claimant has received medical care from the flowing health
• are provider :
23
SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL
2f4 Redondo 'Beach, CA
26
EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBLE FOR INJURY
Plaintiff is currently unaware of the name or names of any
governmental employee or employees who are responsible for this
'!%ncident .
:7'. ;MOUNT CLAIMED :
9
1.Q
1
i.
16
11.
1$
19
26
24
25
26
2
Medical Expenses are currently unascertained, but based upon
information and belief, current medicals are approximately $
10,000.00 Claimant is currently unaware if any future medical
expenses will accrue at this time. Said damage claim would be
venued in the Superior Court for the State of California.
pENERAL DAMAGES :
DATED
/
$ 150,000.000
By
THEPOT & WEST
Attorneys at Law
GEORGE O. WES II
Attorney for Claimant
HOLLY ANN MILLER
Lawrence R. Booth*
Richard B. Koskoff *
Johnna J. Hansen*
of Counsel
Donald Joseph Beck
Office Manager
Joanne Barrett
*A Law. Corporation
DEM n'o3
Law Offices
i at. & 31(u -skull
A Professional Association of Personal Injury Trial Lawyers
Iowa Courthouse Bldg.
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 6430
18411 Crenshaw Blvd., Suite 380
Torrance, California 90504-0430
(310) 5154361 (714) 641-7334 1
September 16, 1996
SEP 301996 -
CITY CLERK
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
REGEI
SEP 1 8 1996
PERSONNEL/RISK DEPT.
ounty
Palm Desert
Beverly Hills
Malibu
z)093Q5 Wg3
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested:
aid First Class Mail
CITY CLERK
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1315 VALLEY DRIVE
HERMOSA BEACH CA 90254
Re:
Jillian Stern
Date of Accident: 3/31/96
Our File No. 96-6006.
PLEASE TARE NOTICE that this firm on behalf of our client Jillian
Stern is hereby presenting a..claim, pursuant to the applicable
provisions of the Government - Code of, the State of California in
connection with the accident that occurred on March 31, 1996 at the
s» _
intersection of ,The Strand and. The Pier at' approximately 1200 The
Strand, City: -----of -Hermosa Beach,' County of Los Angeles, State of
California ,_ =-My signature -at -the bottom _ of this letter constitutes
the `verification required by law. I All correspondence `with our
client should be directed tothe undersigned.
The general ;facts ;of the accident are that ms.
s Jillian Stern was
roller-blad ng northbound on =The` trand at the above location when
she wasp
as };shuck bpi a bicycletieing
ridden on the southbound
directionon The Strand. The subject location was in adangerous
condition
defectively designed ar/ore improperlymanta�ned as
defined by the Government;; Code as . t,is equipped with a set hof
flashing red lights with Y`"signs:, that tell bicyclists;. and
skateboarders 'to dismount and walk =zthrough the intersection*y=sos
to avo1d collisions`: with pedestrians and an .:ne skaters when the
t.
red l.ghts ar flashing,,. There was no` automatic timer or any other
device" th hAe triggers the l .ghts at busy times such as the noon
hours on Saturdays and Sundays in the Spring and Summer and in
addition the City of Hermosa'Beach negligentlly utilized the lights
manually. At the time of the subject accident, approximately 1:30
p.m` on March 31, 1996," a weekend day during the highest use hours,
the red lights were not flashing and bicyclists were being
permitted to cross the intersection without dismounting. Ms. Stern
was struck by a bicyclist in this intersection.
"The Iowa Courthouse was built in 1885 and transported to Southern California in
1980 — located immediately next to the San Diego Freeway at Crenshaw Boulevard."
September 16, 1996
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested: P 065 940 972
and First Class Mail
CITY CLERK
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Re: Jillian Stern
Date of Accident: 3/31/96
Our File No. 96-6006
Page 2.
The amount of the claim is for $750,000 for personal injury and
permanent disability from, among other things, the left knee from
a shattered kneecap. The kneecap has been surgically repaired and
will require additional surgery to remove the wiring. Jillian
Stern also makes a claim for loss of earnings in excess of $30,000
and medical bills estimated at this point in time to be in excess
of $7,500.
The basis of liability against the City of Hermosa Beach includes,
but is not limited to, negligence in maintaining a dangerous
condition, ownership, maintenance and operation by the City of
Hermosa Beach of an area in a dangerous condition and the
negligence of City employees, names unknown, with regard thereto in
connection with the maintenance and control of the dangerous
condition, and other acts of negligence associated with this
accident, the exact nature of which are unknown at this time. The
City of Hermosa Beach also negligently supervised its employees
and/or agents in this regard.
Very truly yours,
osu Hermosa Beach Incident Report DR -96-1004
September 30, 1996
Horrible Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach City Council October 8, 1996
FIRE DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT PURCHASE
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council:
Appropriate $3,869.00 from the Fire Flow Fund for the purchase of ten
(10) breathing apparatus bottles.
Analysis
Breathing apparatus are used by firefighters to enter into a hazardous
environment. The air bottles associated with these breathing apparatus have a
fifteen year life span per D.O.T. regulations. Ten air bottles are expiring at the
end of October and will need to be replaced.
At the regular council meeting on April 23, 1996 Council approved amending the
Fire Flow Ordinance to allow for the purchase of firefighting equipment and
vehicles.
Fiscal Impact
Funds are available in the Fire Flow Fund.
Respectfully Submitted,
Pete Bonano
Fire Chief
Con ur: Concur:
Stephen
City Man : ger
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
if
Honorable Mayor and Members of
The Hermosa Beach City Council
October 2, 1996
Regular Meeting of
October 8, 1996
SANITARY SEWER MAINTENANCE AND VIDEO INSPECTION
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Award the subject contract to Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. for an amount of
$234,570 for three years of sanitary sewer system maintenance and video inspection.
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes within the budget.
BACKGROUND:
On February 13, 1996 the City Council approved staff recommendation to continue the preventive
maintenance strategy to prolong the life of our sewer system. On June 27, 1996 City Council
approved the budget for fiscal year 1996-97 which included a sewer maintenance contract.
ANALYSIS:
On August 15, 1996 seven bids received by the City Clerk's office were opened and publicly read
aloud. ABC Service of La Palma, California was the lowest bidder, however after bid opening
they withdrew their bid claiming they made an error in the calculation of the bid amount. Staff
contacted the second low bidder, Video Inspection Specialist of Fresno, California. They
withdrew their bid since they just entered into another contract which obligated their time. The
third low bidder, Empire Pipe Cleaning of Orange, California was contacted, their bid was in line
with the other bidders, and their references were checked.
Bid analysis are as follows:
.......................
LOW BIDDERS
ORDER
CONTRACTOR
TOTAL
1YR.
$
TOTAL
2YR.
$
TOTAL
3YR.
$
TOTAL
$
1.
ABC Service
36,220
34,420
36,470
107,110
2.
Video Inspection
Specialist
72,200
75,540
81,900
229,640
V 3.
EMPIRE PIPE
CLEANING
82,670
74,500
77,400
234,570
4.
National Paint
Services
137,200
128,050
134,100
399,350
5.
Pssi Inc.
150,000
128,000
128,000
406,000
6.
United Pumping
Service
218,150
187,950
223,400
629,500
7.
Hoffman Southwest
657,000
545,500
565,000
1,767,500
Sanitary sewer maintenance, which consists of hydroflushing, is known as the best preventive
maintenance strategy and commonly used to prolong the life of the system, root cutting and
herbicidal foaming to control the root problems in the pipe. This over all maintenance will reduce
the causes of sewer backups (and City liability) by removing roots, grease and other build ups that
act as obstacles in the system. Close Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection of the sewer network
is the primary means of deterring the physical condition of a gravity flow infrastructure system.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Sewer maintenance contract will impact the available sewer fund by $82,670 for fiscal year
1996-97.
Budget:
Contract $82,670
Contengency at 20% $16,534
Total Budget $99,204
Respectfully submitted,
Homayoun Behboodi
Assistant Engineer
Noted:
Viki Copeland
Finance Director
srl.a.ccitems.sewinsp
Concur:
Amy Amis ani
Director of Public Works
Stephe
City ager
/o -Y-96'
October 3, 1996
City Council Meeting
October 8, 1996
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
ORDINANCE NO. 96-1163 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 17.04.040,
MODIFYING THE DEFINITION AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING BUILDING HEIGHT
AND GRADE."
Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 96-1163, relating to the
above subject.
At the meeting of September 24, 1996, this ordinance was presented
to Council for consideration and was introduced by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Noted:
Benz, Bowler, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
None
Edgerton
None
Stephen R. Bur
City Manager
E sine DoerflinClerk
p
ORDINANCE NO. 96-1163
A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 17.04.040, MODIFYING THE DEFINITION
AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING BUILDING HEIGHT AND GRADE
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on September 24, 1996 to consider
oral and written testimony and made the following Findings:
A. Definitions of building height and the grade used to determine the building height
were recently amended to provide needed clarification;
B. The application and use of the method to determine height under this new definition,
however, has shown that it is inflexible and potentially inaccurate when applied to
extreme cut and fill conditions where a corner point is on or near a retaining wall
separating the lot from adjacent property.
C. The subject text amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the general rule set forth in Section
15061(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility that these modifications
to the ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby
recommend that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows:
SECTION 1. Amend Section 17.04.040 to read as follows:
"Building Height" means a vertical distance measured from grade, as determined as
described herein, to the corresponding uppermost point of the roof, as shown in the examples
attached at the end of Chapter 17.04." (examples shown on separate page)
"Grade" at any point on a lot is determined based on existing corner point elevations, taking
into consideration significant variations relative to adjacent properties. In cases where there is
significant variation in elevations between adjacent properties at corner points, the point of
measurement shall be established based on the elevation at the nearest public improvement or an
alternative point within 3 horizontal feet which, based on supporting evidence, represents existing
-1-
unaltered grade. In the absence of supporting documentation the corner point elevation shall be
established at 1/2 the difference between the adjacent elevation and the elevation on the property in
question.
The determination of grade shall be made by the Community Development Director, based
on all available evidence, and any disputes shall be referred to the Planning Commission.
For lots with convex contours (where the ground level arches upward along a property line)
the "grade" of a lot may be based on a detailed topographical survey along the property line with
spot elevations called out at a minimum of two (2) foot intervals."
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from
and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption.
SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the
City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader a weekly newspaper of
general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided
by law.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance of
said city, and shall make minutes of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed
and adopted.
PASSED APPROVED and ADOPTED this 22nd day of October, 1996, by the following vote.
AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California.
ATTEST: APPROVE AS TO FORM
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
-2-
Honorable Mayor and Members of the
Hermosa Beach City Council
=4'_ •/ - �'-�'_,"`, ��� �.�-tet '
,cc
October 1, 1996
Regular Meeting of
October 8, 1996
/o-7- 9-6
SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 96-4 &
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-8
LOCATION: 807 21ST STREET (NORTHEAST CORNER OF 21ST STREET AND
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY)
APPLICANTS: PROJECT DEVELOPER:
WIBERG DEVELOPMENT
4505 MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD
LAWNDALE, CA 90254
ARCHITECT:
DEAN NOTA
2465 MYRTLE AVENUE
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
SUBJECT: TO RECONSIDER THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO
APPROVE A NEW MULTI -USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING, WITH
AUTO REPAIR AND OFFICE USES
Planning Commission and Staff Recommendations
To sustain the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the requested Precise
Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit subject to the conditions as contained in the
Planning Commission resolution.
Background
At their meeting of August 20, 1996, the Planning Commission approved the project by a vote of
5:0 subject to certain conditions of approval.
PROJECT INFORMATION:
ZONING: SPA 8 - Commercial Specific Plan
Area
4
1
GENERAL PLAN:
LOT SIZE:
INDOOR HABITABLE FLOOR AREA:
FLOOR AREA - AUTO REPAIR:
FLOOR AREA - OFFICE:
F.A.R. (Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio)
PARKING REQUIRED:
PARKING PROVIDED:
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
General Commercial
6,810 Square Feet
5343 Square Feet
3515 Square Feet (including 700
Sq. Ft. of storage)
1828 Square Feet
0.78
21
22
Recommended Mitigated Negative
Declaration
Adjacent properties to the north and east are also zoned SPA - 8 and are commercially developed
with office uses. Areas to the south across 21st Street are residentially zoned.
The site is developed with an old single-family structure that has been remodeled and expanded for
commercial restaurant purposes. The building has been unoccupied for over two years.
The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of June 13, 1996 considered the
environmental impacts of the project, and based on the initial study check -list (attached), and
testimony at the meeting, recommended an Environmental Negative Declaration. The finding that
traffic impacts are less than significant was based on a comparison of the previous 2600 square
foot restaurant with related surface parking and the originally proposed 6,000 square foot auto
repair/office building (3,000 sq. ft. auto repair and 3,000 sq. ft. office). The plans have since been
modified during the plan approval process reducing the office space to 1828 square feet, further
reducing potential environmental impacts.
Analysis
The project involves the construction of three levels, two stories of commercial space above one
level of semi -subterranean parking. The building's first floor will include 5 auto repair service
bays incorporating auto repair lifts, a waiting area, and 4 parking spaces for the auto repair
business. The second floor will include the offices, a storage area above the service bays, and a
roof deck. The basement level provides 13 parking spaces for use by the auto repair business and
office users.
The project is designed to exhibit a two-story appearance on Pacific Coast Highway, with the
parking level partially hidden below the sloping grade.
PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN / S.P.A. 8 ZONE COMPLIANCE
2
The Specific Plan Area zone includes two sets of development standards (see section 9.68-6).
This two tier approach was established to allow development that complies with the first tier
standards as a matter of right without a Precise Development Plan. In this case, the project
complies with first tier standards for bulk (less than 1:1 F.A.R.), maximum size (less than 10,000
square feet), and landscaping coverage (greater than 5%) However, the building height is
proposed to be 35 feet rather than the first tier maximum of 25 -feet. Thus, the Precise
Development Plan review is required for the project to exceed the first tier height standard.
Pursuant to the specific of standards of the S.P.A. 8 zone and the underlying C-3 zoning the
project conforms with the zoning requirements with respect to parking, building height, and
landscaping as follows:
• Off-street parking is provided to exceed the total requirement of 21 spaces based on the
cumulative requirement of the proposed uses of the building. The project parking is based
on the office and retail required parking ratio of 1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor
area. The code does not specify a ratio for employee parking or "auto repair", however,
parking at the retail ratio is more restrictive than the standard for "automobile sales" or
"service station" (1 per 1000 square feet of site area) and will accomodate customers and
employees'. The gross floor area includes the 700 square foot storage area, resulting in a
requirement of 21 spaces. 13 spaces are provided in the basement level, and 9 at the first
level (5 in the service bays and 4 open) Also, parking for the physically handicapped is
provided on the first floor.
Parking Tabulation
1. Auto Sales 1/1000 Site Area
6.8
Office 1/250 G.F.A.* 7.3
Total 14 Calculated at Auto Sales/Service Ratio
2. Auto Retail 1/250 G.F.A.
Office 1/250 G.F.A.
14.1
7.3
Total 21 Calculated at Retail Ratio
*Gross Floor Area
Using the less restrictive auto sales or service station parking requirement would result in a
total of 14 spaces of required parking (see #1 above). The project is parked at the retail
parking requirement resulting in a total of 21 spaces required (see #2 above). Therefore the
proposed auto repair use is parked at a more restrictive standard, requiring 7 more spaces,
which can incorporate employee parking on site.
3
Survey of Existing Auto Repair C.U.P.'s: Staff researched previous Planning Commission
approvals for selected similar small auto repair uses. New or expanded auto repair uses
approved within the las five years have included service bays for required parking (Valvoline
Oil Change/Discount Tire Center at 1414 P.C.H., and Mike's Auto Repair at 1986 Aviation).
Some older auto repair uses, when C.U.P.'s were obtained pursuant to the amortization
ordinance, were found to comply with parking by counting service bays, and other's were
not able to comply with current parking requirements and remain legally nonconforming.
King Bear and Felder's Auto Body and Repair are examples that comply without counting
service bays.2
• Building Height: The building is designed to fit within the 35 foot maximum height limit
(second tier) as measured from the existing grade (interpolating from the existing four corner
points). The building extends up to a maximum of 34 feet as measured from the lowest part
of the lot at the P.C.H. and 21st street corner, and varies significantly due to the varying roof
and building features and the slope of the lot. While the grade of the lot slopes significantly
upward to the northeast, the corresponding building height does not. As such, the building's
height is well below the maximum height envelope at the east and northeasterly portions of
the site (see plan elevations).
• Landscaping is provided to cover 6% of the site, to fully comply with the minimum 5% first
tier standard. Also, the landscaped frontage on P.C.H. complies with the standard of S.P.A.
8. While not continuous along the whole length, the landscaping accounts for 310 square
feet, which exceeds the total that would be provided with a 3 -foot wide continuous strip.
The use of the prominent southwest corner for the bulk of this landscaping will maximize the
visibility of the landscaping and provide the desired effect to create relief from the building
mass.
Beyond the basic standards of the zone, the purpose of S.P.A. zone and Precise Development Plan
review, pursuant to Sections 9.68-6 and 9.68-7 of the Zoning Ordinance, is to ensure high quality
development with respect to the overall project design and layout. The S.P.A. zone contains
explicit guidelines about design, including height, bulk, and setbacks, and general guidelines about
compatibility, and the project is in conformance with these standards with respect to:
Design and appearance: On the most visible elevations on P.C.H. and 21st Street, the
building is designed with interesting stepped and curved architectural features and a variety
of materials to help articulate the building facade. These exterior features are complemented
with variable heights and types of roofs, reducing the apparent bulk and height at upper
levels, and enhancing the overall appearance. These same features are repeated on all sides
of building and, as noted above, towards the northeasterly portion of the site the building's
roof line is well below the maximum height envelope. Overall these features successfully
minimize the visual impact and view impacts of the part of the structure that exceeds 25 -feet,
4
and results in an overall height, scale and appearance consistent with the guidelines for
exceeding the first tier height limit.
Traffic Circulation / Safety: The two separate entrances to the upper and lower service and
parking areas located immediately adjacent to each other is not an ideal way to enter and exit
a site as, in effect, the street is being used as the ramp to connect these two parking areas.
However, in working with the City to resolve safety and convenience issues the final design
provides for two-way ingress and egress into each area, and adequate visibility for cars
entering and exiting the site. Given the constraints of the site with respect to size, topography
and its location on P.C.H. this was determined to be the best solution. Further, each level
and the entire project itself will generate fairly low levels of traffic volume, allowing this
configuration to work safely and conveniently.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The owner/developer of the property specifically chose this site to relocate a successful auto repair
business, Swedish Pro -Tech, to a more desirable location closer to the customer base. Certain
attributes of the location are ideal for this type of use, as it does not directly abut any residential
property, and it is located on a P.C.H. comer allowing access via a stop -light. On the other hand,
the adjacent commercial uses while compatible, are primarily offices, not an ideal neighboring use.
Also, while the property does not directly abut any residential uses, a single-family residential
neighborhood is located to the southeast along 21st Street, and a multi -family apartment is located
directly across 21st Street to the South. Because of these various factors staff and the Planning
Commission paid close attention to the proposed use and its operation, in including both standard
conditions for auto repair operations and some site specific conditions.
In response to the applicant's description of use and operational characteristics of the proposed
business, and in considering compatibility issues, the following conditions were included to
supplement the conditions for a typical general auto repair use:
• Operation hours: Mon -Fri 8AM-6PM, Saturdays 9:OOAM-4:OOPM, No Sundays
• Maximum 5 on-site mechanics (one per service bay)
• Test drives restricted to P.C.H. and other non-residential areas, right -turn only onto 21st Street
• Tow -truck drop-offs directly inside facility
Other attributes mentioned, such as working indoors, proper disposal and storage of oils and
solvents, are typical of all similar establishments, and requirements of local and/or state laws.
Another unique attribute related to the building design, is that the service bays are partially hidden
from view from the street and well setback from the street. This will contribute towards
minimizing noise, and will certainly lessen the visual impacts.
5
CONCUR:
Sol Blumenfe d, Director
Community Development Department
Stephen R. t ell
City Manag
Attachments
1. Planning Commission Resolution
2. Planning Commission Minutes
3. Planning Commission Staff Report with Attachments
4. Correspondence
5. Excerpt from H.B. Zoning Code - Parking Requirements
6. Survey of City parking requirements - auto repair uses
7;)/4
Ken Robertson
Associate Planner
'The City of Hermosa Beach's commercial parking requirements, as established in the Zoning Code, are based on a per gross
square footage ratio. The ratio was established to ensure that that all anticipated parking needs for the specified type of
commercial use are provided on-site, including parking for customers and employees.
The Zoning Code does not specify a parking ratio for "Auto Repair." The two listed auto related use are Automobile Sales, or
Service Station, both requiring 1 space per 1,000 square feet of site area. A business offering just auto repair services,
however, differs from both these types of uses as outdoor area is not used for merchandise sales/display. (See attached excerpt
from the Zoning Code)
The specified ratio for "retail, general retail uses" (the selling of goods to the ultimate consumer) is one space per 250 square
feet. Auto repair does not perfectly fit into this category either since its a combination of the sale of goods (parts) and service.
As such, when determining the parking requirement for motor vehicle services Staff has calculated the requirement using both
methods of calculation, and using the result which requires the most parking. In the subject case, using the 1 per 1000 square
feet results in only 7 required spaces for the auto repair uses. Using the 1 per 250 square feet standard resulted in a more
appropriate requirement of 14 spaces. The City has also established the practice of counting service bays towards required
parking, since the customers vehicle is essentially being parked for there for the service period. As an example, this same
standard was applied to the commercial building at 1414 P.C.H. (Discount Tire Center and Valvoline Oil Change) without
resulting in noticeable shortages in parking. For comparison of Hermosa Beach with other cities parking requirements for auto
repair see the attachment.
2The following selected Auto Repair C.U.P. were researched for their parking ratio's, use of service bays:
Valvoline Oil Change/Discount Tire 28
1414 P.C.H.
Felder's 210 P.C.H. 23
Mike's Auto Repair / Buck's 1086 28
Aviation
Folded Wing's 1402 P.C.H. 12
Sola Motor Warks 2212 P.C.H. 7
LeGarage 325 Ardmore 9
6
24 (0)
32 (16)
conforming
conforming
13 (5) conforming
7 (4) conforming
9 (4) nonconforming (due to valet style
1
A & M Auto Repair 421 P.C.H. 6
S & S Automotive 900 Aviation
King Bear 1017 Aviation
KRc:\pc\sr807
17
5
7
exterior valet parking
7 (4)
16 (9)
12 (3)
site parking)
nonconforming stall size/turning
areas
nonconforming
conforming
17.44.020
space lost because of new
curbcuts and/or drivew s.
C. tiple Two off-street sp . es for
dwe gs each dwellin . unit plus
(three o one guest . • ace for each
more units two d elling units. One
ad., ' onal space of on-site
D. De . hed
rvants' quarters
or guesthouses.
or code Appx. A, § 1151)
est parking shall be
vided for each on -street
sp. - lost because of new
curbc and/or driveways.
One spa
17.44.030 Off-street parking --Commercial
and business uses.
Required Number of Spaces by Use. The
aggregate amount of off-street automobile parking
spaces provided for various uses shall not be less
than the following:
A. Auditoriums for churches, theater,
entertainment, sports and other places and rooms of
public assembly for more than twenty (20) persons:
one space for each five seats, permanent or
removable, or one space for each fifty (50) square
feet of gross floor area in the auditorium, whichever
is greater.
B. Automobile or boat sales: one space for each
one thousand (1,000) square feet of site area.
C. Bowling alleys: five spaces for each lane plus
one space for each three hundred (300) square feet
of gross floor area except bowling alley lanes and
approach areas.
D. Clubs, fraternity and sorority houses, rooming
and boarding houses and similar uses having
sleeping and guest rooms: two covered spaces for
each three guest rooms: in dormitories each fifty
(50) square feet shall be considered a guest room,
two spaces shall be required for each guest room
with kitchen facilities.
E. Commercial Uses.
1. Bars and cocktail lounges: one space for each
eighty (80) square feet of gross floor area.
2. Beauty colleges: one space for each one
hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area.
3. Business schools and trade schools: one space
for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross
floor area.
4. Furniture and hardware stores: one space for
each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross
floor area.
5. Offices, general: one space for each two
hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area.
6. Offices, Governmental and Public Utilities.
Government offices that generate high levels of
contact with the public, or have high numbers of
employees, including but not limited to employment
offices, public social services offices, department of
motor vehicle offices: one space per seventy-five
(75) square feet of gross floor area for the first
twenty -thousand (20,000) square feet of the
building(s), plus one space per two hundred fifty
(250) square feet of gross floor area for the
remaining floor area.
7. Offices, medical: five spaces for each one
thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area.
8. Restaurants (other than walk-up, drive-
through and drive-in: one space for each one
hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area.
9. Restaurants, walk-up, drive-through and
drive-in without adequate dining room facilities: one
space for each fifty (50) square feet of gross floor
area, but not less than ten spaces.
10. Retail, general retail commercial uses: one
space for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet
of gross floor area.
11. Gymnasiums/health and fitness centers, as
follows:
a. less than or equal to three thousand (3,000)
square feet, and with less than or equal to twenty
(20) students at one time if classes are offered: one
space per two hundred fifty (250) square feet of
gross floor area.
b. greater than three thousand (3,000) square
feet, or with more than twenty (20) students at one
time if classes are offered: one space per one
hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area.
F. Hospitals: two spaces for each patient bed.
(17.44) 2
2
ti
G. Hospitals (mental), convalescent homes, guest
homes, rest homes, sanitariums and similar
institutions: one space for each three beds.
H. Hotels: one space for each unit for the first
fifty (50) units; one space per one and one-half units
after fifty (50); and one space per two units after
one hundred (100) units. Hotels with facilities
including restaurants, banquet rooms, conference
rooms, commercial retail uses and similar activities
shall provide parking for the various uses as
computed separately in accordance with the
provisions of this chapter.
I. Industrial Uses. The parking requirements of
this subsection apply only to industrial uses; parking
for commercial and other permitted uses in
industrial zones shall provide the number of spaces
as otherwise specified by this chapter.
1. Industrial uses of all types; except, public
utility facilities and warehouses: one space for each
vehicle used in conjunction with the use; plus one
space for each three hundred (300) square feet of
gross floor area.
2. Warehouses, buildings or portions of
buildings used exclusively for warehouse purposes:
one space for each one thousand (1,000) square feet
for the first twenty thousand (20,000) square feet;
plus, one space for each two thousand (2,000)
square feet for the second twenty thousand (20,000)
square feet; plus one space for each four thousand
(4,000) square feet in excess of forty thousand
(40,000) square feet; plus one space for each vehicle
operated from the property. Prior to approval of a
warehouse use by the city, a covenant shall be
recorded, guaranteeing the warehouse area, facility
or building will not be converted, remodeled or
changed to a nonwarehouse use unless the number
of spaces otherwise required by this chapter are
secured and provided prior to such change or unless
approved by planning commission in accordance
with this chapter.
J. Mobilehomes or trailer parks: two spaces for
each dwelling unit with at least one space adjacent
to the trailer site.
17.44.030
K. Mortuaries or undertaking establishments: one
space for each seventy-five (75) square feet of
building area for the chapel or public assembly area.
L. Motels: one space for each unit, plus two for
the manager's unit.
M. Recreation or amusement establishments: one
space for each seventy-five (75) square feet of gross
floor area.
4f E N. Service stations: one space for each one
thousand (1,000) square feet of site area.
O. Snack Bar/Snack Shop. The parking
requirements for a snack bar and/or snack shop shall
be the same as that for "restaurant" unless it can be
shown to the planning commission that the
characteristics of the building; it's location, and
other mitigating factors result in less parking being
necessary for the business. (Ord. 95-1126 § 1, 1995;
prior code Appx. A, § 1152)
7.44.040 Parking requirements for the
downtown area.
e following requirements apply within ' the
bounof the downtown area, as define • by the
map inc rporated by this reference.
A. Th amount of parking shall be alculated at
sixty-five (. ) percent of the par ' • g required for
each particuluse as set forth in - tion 17.44.030.
B. Building sites equal t• or less than ten
thousand (10,000 quare fee the floor area to lot
area ratio is 1:1 or 1. s no ,4 king is required. If the
floor area to lot areio exceeds 1:1 only the
excess floor area o = the 1:1 ratio shall be
considered in dete i the required parking
pursuant to subse' 'on A o this section.
C. Bicycle .cks/facilitie shall be provided
and/or mai ined in conj ► ction with any
intensifica ' • n of use, or new c • struction, in an
amount d location to the sati action of the
plann g director. (Ord. 94-1099 § 1994: prior
cod Appx. A, § 1152.5)
7.44.050 Unlawful to reduce avail
parking.
The provision and maintenance of require off-
Summary of Selected City Parking Requirements - Auto Repair Uses
Can IService Bays
Count Toward_
Required Park
Hermosa Beach
1 per 250 square feet
YES
Torrance
3 per service bay
YES
Redondo Beach
1 per 250 square feet, not
less than 3 per service bay
*no
*current interpretation, not
specified in code
Manhattan Beach
1 per 300 square feet
NO, specifically
prohibited
El Segundo
2 per service bay + 2 for the
auto repair office
NO
Seal Beach
5 total + 1 for each service
bay
NO
Gardena
1 per 200 square feet
YES
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 96-28
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AUTOMOBILE REPAIR AND
ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 807 21ST STREET AND
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 9 & 10, AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 8 AND 11,
TRACT 2143
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 20, 1996, to
receive oral and written testimony regarding the subject project and made the following findings:
A. The applicants are proposing to construct a two-story multi -use commercial building
above one -levels of semi -subterranean parking, with auto repair service bays and office
space, and to operate a business offering Motor Vehicle repair service limited to
automobiles;
B. The project is consistent with applicable general and specific plans, and is in compliance
with the use and development requirements of the zoning ordinance ;
C. The site is zoned S.P.A. 8, Specific Plan Area -Commercial, and project and proposed use
complies with the development standards contained therein (Section 9.68-6). Further, the
project is consistent with the guidelines for Planning Commission approval to exceed the
first tier height limit of 25 -feet, to a maximum of 35 feet, as set forth in Section 9.68-
7(b)2. The site is thus suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed development;
D. The project exhibits the appropriate scale, and a quality of design and construction
materials, which will make it compatible with surrounding commercial development
E. The proposed automobile repair business is an appropriate use for the Pacific Coast
Highway commercial corridor and is compatible with surrounding commercial and
residential uses;
F. Compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting
from the issuance of the precise development plan
G. The Planning Commission concurs with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's
recommendation, based on their environmental assessment/initial study, that this
(I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
project will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore
qualifies for a Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY APPROVE A PRECISE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY MULTI-
USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW
AUTOMOBILE REPAIR AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
SECTION I Specific Conditions of Approval
1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with
submitted plans reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of August 20,
1996. Modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the
Community Development Director.
2. Architectural treatment shall be as shown on building elevations of submitted plans and any
modification shall require approval by the Community Development Director.
a. Any roof -top equipment shall be integrated into the architecture and be hidden from
street view.
3. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department.
4. Final building plans/construction drawings including site, elevation, floor plan, sections,
details, landscaping and irrigation, submitted for building permit issuance shall be reviewed
for consistency with the plans approved by the Planning Commission and the conditions of
this resolution, and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the
issuance of any Building Permit.
5. Three (3) copies of a landscaping plan indicating size, type, and quantity of plant materials
(including trunk diameter at planting time) to be planted demonstrating full compliance with
Section 9.6-8 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be submitted to the Community Development
Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
a. An automatic landscape irrigation system shall be provided, and shall be shown on
plans.
b. Trees to be planted shall be a minimum 24" box size
6. All exterior lights shall be located and oriented in a manner to insure that neighboring
residential property and public right-of-way shall not be adversely effected
7 The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of
the Municipal Code
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
8. A "stop" and/or "yield" sign shall be prominently posted at the vehicular exits to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
SECTION II Conditions for the operation and management of the Auto Repair Facility
1. A maximum of five (5) mechanics shall be employed on the premises at any one time.
2. Motor vehicle repair and service shall be limited to automobiles only.
3. The public right-of-way shall not be used for the parking or storing of vehicles that are intended for
service, for sale, or for the parking or storing of employee vehicles, or for tow trucks dropping off
vehicles for service. Directory signs shall be provided on the premises directing employees and
patrons of the business to on-site parking and indicating that parking on the the public street is
prohibited.
4. Test driving of vehicles on local residential streets shall be prohibited. A sign shall be posted at the
exit indicating " right turn only" for exiting of vehicles.
5. Hazardous waste material shall be handled and stored indoors or in an enclosure, and the disposal
of said materials shall be in accordance with local, state, and federal laws, and in no event shall such
waste material be allowed to drain into the City storm drain system.
6. Examining, installing, or repairing car alarm systems shall be prohibited.
7. There shall be no bells, buzzers or similar apparatus audible outdoors. Outside speakers for any
purpose shall be prohibited.
8. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's Noise
Ordinance, Article 19.5 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, and shall not create a nuisance to
the surrounding residences.
9. The exterior of the premises including the parking areas shall be maintained in a neat and clean
manner at all times.
10. All outdoor parking and driveway areas shall be maintained free of unregistered and derelict
vehicles and/or parts and debris.
11. Storage of vehicles, including trucks, tractors, trailers, recreational vehicles, automobiles and
equipment in the outdoor parking areas shall be prohibited.
12. The hours of operation for auto repair services shall be limited to between 8:00 A.M. and 6:00
P.M. Monday thru Friday, and 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. on Saturday.
13. All auto repair shall be conducted inside the building, and all outdoor work activities shall be
prohibited (minor examination of vehicles for the purpose of estimates not lasting more than 15
minutes are excepted.).
SECTION III:
I3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the
property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development
Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the
conditions of this grant.
The Precise Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded, and proof of
recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department.
Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is
found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid an enforceable.
Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees
from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to
attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable
time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of
any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails
to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to
cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be
required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant.
Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion,
participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve
the permittee of any obligation under this condition.
The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the
conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any
development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any
development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions
VOTE: AYES: Comms. Merl, Perrotti, Pizer, Schwartz, Chmn. Tucker
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 96-28 is a true and complete record of the
actio • ken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their
re lar seting . • : 20, 1996.
1
Peter Tucker, C .'rman Sol Blum nfel., Secretary
£'-('1-9fr
Date
4
KR\h:\pc\RS807
BACKGROUND MATERIAL
7. PDP 96-4/CUP 96-8 -- PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 6,000 SQUARE FOOT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH AUTO REPAIR AND OFFICE USES, AND
ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 807
21ST STREET (continued from July 16, 1996 meeting).
Staff Recommended Action: To approve said Precise Development Plan and
Conditional Use Permit, and adopt the Environmental Negative Declaration.
Mr. Schubach presented the Staff Report, noting the owner specifically chose this site, which has
ideal use attributes with compatible adjacent uses, although primarily offices. He discussed
factors warranting careful consideration of the proposed use and operation, as well as proposed
hours of operation, on-site operation, building design and proposed interior usage. Typical
conditions relative to this use were proposed by Staff. Mr. Schubach said Staff had an affidavit
stating everyone had been properly noticed. Supplemental material had been received suggesting
several changes and staff was in agreement with the proposed changes.
Chmn. Tucker opened the Public Hearing at 7:35 p.m.
David Moss, Moss & Assoc., 631 Wilshire Blvd. #208, Santa Monica, applicant's representative,
discussed the applicant's goals in operating his business. Mr. Moss discussed Mr. Nota's building
design, which he felt was not intrusive in the neighborhood, with internalized activities. The
suggested changes resulted from meetings with owners of the adjacent building. Responding to
Commission questions, Mr. Moss explained all hazardous wastes are stored inside the building
and disposed off as required. Mr. Moss explained how the road testing issues would be addressed
and performed.
Dean Nota, project architect, discussed the sloping site, property frontage, proposed floor plan,
business operation processes and equipment, waste storage, tow truck assess and proposed traffic
flow. He noted the building had a variety of walls and roof heights and would be an asset to the
area. Meetings with the adjacent building owners resulted in several changes which Mr. Nota
detailed, and to which the applicant had agreed. Mr. Nota asked approval of the project, stating
the applicant agreed with the various Conditions, and thanked Staff for their help and
cooperation. Mr. Nota explained the entrance and exit site slopes to Comm. Pizer, who had
expressed concern regarding the safety of children on the sidewalk area. Mr. Nota agreed a sign
could be placed at the exit.
Hakan Wiberg, 4505 Manhattan Beach Blvd., Lawndale, responding to Chmn. Tucker's
concerns regarding the number of cars entering the building per day, said his employees were on
salary and not commission.
Nancy Costello, 826 21st Street, said she was not notified of this meeting. She said many
accidents had occurred at the corner of Pacific Coast Hwy and 21st Street, asking if this business
will increase that problem as well as the residents' street parking problem. Director Blumenfeld
explained the restrictions that are being considered in the Planning Commission resolutions. He
confirmed the hours of business included work on Saturdays. He suggested the Commission
I5
PC 8-20-96 Minutes
might consider Staff study a partial street parking restriction during the work week. He detailed
several other street site problems which can be addressed by Staff. He felt the Conditions of
approval would mitigate parking and circulation impacts. Ms. Costello suggested restrictions
allowing no vehicle street testing, discussing this issue with Commissioners and Staff. She said
she wished the street to remain as "residential" as possible.
Ellen Birenbaum, 832 21st St., said she had not received notice, and neither were her neighbors.
She felt 21st Street was used as an alternate to Artesia Blvd., asking the impact of customers
turning left into the proposed building. She said this area was a high impact accident area, asking
if traffic would be increased. Chmn. Tucker responded the applicant could regulate the cars
coming into his shop, with most of his clientele being by appointment only. Director Blumenfeld
said the City Engineer would need to study the question of impacts stated by Ms. Birenbaum
before an accurate answer was obtained. With the only building access being on 21st Street, she
asked if 21st Street would be able to handle the increase in traffic.
Terry Teeple, 22672 Lambert, Lake Forest, representing Charles Dunn Co. and the owner of
2200 Pacific Coast Hwy., said he had met with the applicant and his representatives, who have
been extremely helpful and flexible. He felt this venture will add great value to the City, being a
hallmark establishment. He wished to put on record his correspondence dated August 20, 1996.
Noting copies were in the Commission packets, he gave the original to Staff. He applauded the
efforts expended in designing this site and working with neighboring property owners.
Rebuttal
David Moss said the hazardous wastes would be usually restricted to solvents used in auto
repairs, with storage being regulated. He noted there was nothing unusual about this application
except for the storage of those wastes.
No one else wished to speak, and Churn. Tucker closed the Public Hearing at 8:24 p.m.
Comm. Pizer, after discussing possible safety issues and solutions with Mr. Nota, stated support
of the project, to which Comms. Schwartz and Perrotti agreed. Comm. Perrotti explained the
criteria for denial for the audience's information. For Staffs information, he said the Conditions
did not include a requirement of right turn only, suggesting this be included in Condition #4, an
addition requiring the hazardous material be stored in an enclosed area on site, suggested on -
street parking restrictions and a traffic study on the intersection at 21st Street and Pacific Coast
Hwy. be conducted. Churn. Tucker suggested the hours of operation on Saturdays be limited to
9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and the Fed -Ex box be removed.
MOTION by Comm. Schwartz, Seconded by Comm. Perrotti, to ADOPT this Resolution, with
amendment of Conditions #4 to include right turn only, #5 requiring the hazardous waste storage
area shall be enclosed, limiting the hours of operation on Saturdays to 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and
adding a requirement that a stop or yield sign be posted at the exit.
AYES: Comms. Merl, Perrotti, Pizer, Schwartz, Chmn. Tucker
NOES: None
16
PC 8-20-96 Minutes
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION by Comm. Merl, Seconded by Comm. Perrotti, to DIRECT Staff to conduct a study
of traffic and parking patterns in the area, returning with suggestions as to how relief might be
applied to area residents and businesses. No objections, so ordered.
Chinn. Tucker stated the Commission's decisions were appealable within 10 days to the City
Council.
8 CUP 96-9/PARK 96-1 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING
\TO ALLOW THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING 20 -ROOM HOTEL
YOUTH HOSTEL WITH NO ADDITIONAL OFF-STREET PA
ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARAT + N
PIER VENUE, SURF CITY HOSTEL.
P •N
OA
, AND
AT 26
Staff Recoclmended Action To approve said Conditional Use Pe and Parking Plan,
and adopt the vironmental Negative Declaration.
Director Blumenfeld said th
largely been abated. The applic
load from 28 to 57, which requir
sprinklers. Mr. Blumenfeld stated S
exceeds the maximum occupancy loa
permanent beds not to exceed the occup
Approval, Mr. Blumenfeld said the applicant
days. Youth hostels do not have an establishe
parking if the hotel standards are applied. St
not drive to the hostels and supports the re• st
building was subject to a Complianc
t was now requesting approval
various code compliance
was concerned wit
and recomme
limit.
so
Order and conditions had
an increase in the occupancy
easures including the automatic
he plans showing 81 beds, since it
ed a limitation on the number of
er detailing the standard Conditions of
quested the 7 -day limit be modified to 21
arking standard, and would require additional
rs that the majority of guests will generally
dditional required parking.
con
for no
Churn. Tucker opened the Public He. ' g at 8:41 p.m.
Mike Rossi, 26 Pier Ave., Phill'
1204 Ardmore, Manhattan Be
interior had been improved
within the next few mo
decreased in the area
Comm. Pizer, he e
smoke. Mr. Bo
the average s
Mr. Bosto
held to e
Boston, 536 Hyman St., Manh
h, applicants, introduced themselves.
xcept for the sprinkler system, and the out
s. He said other area businesses approved th
d the hostelry was gaining a good international reputat
ained there would be a smoking room, noting that European
ton said they requested a 21 -day stay limitation rather than a 7 -day
y was one to ten days. Many people want to leave, visit other areas
said this establishment was intentionally not a member of HI -AYH and shou
same considerations or conditions as that organization.
an Beach, and Mike Lloyd,
. Lloyd said the building
'de would be completed
activity, crime had
Responding to
and Asians did
e, although
return.
not be
N. one else wished to speak, and Chmn. Tucker closed the Public Hearing at 8:50 p.m.
PC 8-20-96 Minutes
August 13, 1996
Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of
Hermosa Beach Planning Commission August 20, 1996
SUBJECT: PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 96-4
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-8
LOCATION: 807 21ST STREET (NE CORNER OF 21ST STREET AND PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY)
APPLICANTS: PROJECT DEVELOPER:
WIBERG DEVELOPMENT
4505 MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD
LAWNDALE, CA 90254
ARCHITECT:
DEAN NOTA
2465 MYRTLE AVENUE
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
REQUESTS: 1. THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW MULTI -USE COMMERCIAL
BUILDING, WITH AUTO REPAIR AND OFFICE USES
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE AUTO REPAIR USE
Recommendations
To approve the requested Precise Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit subject to the
conditions as contained in the attached resolution.
Background
PROJECT INFORMATION:
ZONING: SPA 8 - Commercial Specific Plan
Area
GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial
LOT SIZE: 6,810 Square Feet
INDOOR HABITABLE FLOOR AREA: 5343 Square Feet
FLOOR AREA - AUTO REPAIR:
FLOOR AREA - OFFICE:
F.A.R. (Floor Area/Lot Area Ratio)
PARKING REQUIRED:
PARKING PROVIDED:
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
3515 Square Feet (including 700
Sq. Ft. of storage)
1828 Square Feet
0.78
21
22
Recommended Mitigated Negative
Declaration
The site is located on the northeast corner of Pacific Coast Highwya and 21st Street. Adjacent
properties to the north and east are also zoned SPA - 8 and are commercially developed with office
uses. Areas to the south across 21st Street are residentially zoned.
The site is developed with an old single-family structure that has been remodeled and expanded for
commercial restaurant purposes. The building has been unoccupied for over two years.
The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of June 13, 1996 considered the
environmental impacts of the project, and based on the initial study check -list (attached), and
testimony at the meeting, recommended an Environmental Negative Declaration. The finding that
traffic impacts are less than significant was based on a comparison of the pre-existing 2600 square
foot restaurant and the originally proposed 6,000 square foot auto repair/office building (3,000 sq.
ft. auto repair and 3,000 sq. ft. office). The plans have since been modified, reducing the office
space to 1828 square feet, further reducing the potential impact.
Analysis
The project involves the construction of three levels, two stories of commercial space above one
level of semi -subterranean parking. The building's first floor will include 5 auto repair service
bays and a waiting area and 4 parking spaces, and the second floor will include the offices, a
storage area above the service bays, and a roof deck. The basement level provides 13 parking
spaces to be shared by the auto repair business and office users.
The project is designed to exhibit a two-story appearance on Pacific Coast Highway, with the
parking level partially hidden below the sloping grade.
PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN / S.P.A. 8 ZONE COMPLIANCE
The Specific Plan Area zone includes two sets of development standards (see section 9.68-6).
This two tier approach was established to allow development that complies with the first tier
standards as a matter of right without a Precise Development Plan. In this case, the project
complies with first tier standards for bulk (less than 1:1 F.A.R.), maximum size (less than 10,000
square feet), and landscaping coverage (greater than 5%) However, the building height is
/9
building height is proposed to be 35 feet rather than the first tier maximum of 25 -feet. Thus, the
Precise Development Plan review is required for the project to exceed the first tier height standard.
Pursuant to the specific of standards of the S.P.A. 8 zone and the underlying C-3 zoning the
project conforms with the zoning requirements with respect to parking, building height, and
landscaping as follows:
Off-street parking is provided to exceed the total requirement of 21 spaces based on the
cumulative requirement of the proposed uses of the building. Both the auto repair and office
use are required to provide 1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area The gross floor
area includes the 700 square foot storage area, resulting in a requirement of 21 spaces. 13
spaces are provided in the basement level, and 9 at the first level (5 in the service bays and 4
open) Also, parking for the physically handicapped is provided on the first floor.
The building is designed to fit within the 35 foot maximum height limit (second tier) as
measured from the existing grade (interpolating from the existing four corner points). The
building extends up to a maximum of 34 feet as measured from the lowest part of the lot at
the P.C.H. and 21st street corner, and varies significantly due to the varying roof and building
features and the slope of the lot. While the grade of the lot slopes significantly upward to the
northeast, the corresponding building height does not. As such, the building's height is well
below the maximum height envelope at the east and northeasterly portions of the site (see
plan elevations).
Landscaping is provided to cover 6% of the site, to fully comply with the minimum 5% first
tier standard. Also, the landscaped frontage on P.C.H. complies with the standard of S.P.A.
8. While not continuous along the whole length, the landscaping accounts for 310 square
feet, which exceeds the total that would be provided with a 3 -foot wide continuous strip.
The use of the prominent southwest corner for the bulk of this landscaping will maximize the
visibility of the landscaping and provide the desired effect to create relief from the building
mass.
Beyond the basic standards of the zone, the purpose of S.P.A. zone and Precise Development Plan
review, pursuant to Sections 9.68-6 and 9.68-7 of the Zoning Ordinance, is to ensure high quality
development with respect to the overall project design and layout. Staff has the following
comments with respect to design and circulation:
On the most visible elevations on P.C.H. and 21st Street, the building is designed with
interesting stepped and curved architectural features and a variety of materials to help
articulate the building facade. These exterior features are complemented with variable
heights and types of roofs, reducing the apparent bulk and height at upper levels, and
enhancing the overall appearance. These same features are repeated on all sides of building
and, as noted above, towards the northeasterly portion of the site the building's roof line is
well below the maximum height envelope. Overall these features successfully minimize the
20
visual impact and view impacts of the part of the structure that exceeds 25 -feet, and results in
an overall height, scale and appearance consistent with the guidelines for exceeding the first
tier height limit.
The two separate entrances to the upper and lower service and parking areas located
immediately adjacent to each other is not an ideal way to enter and exit a site as, in effect, the
street is being used as the ramp to connect these two parking areas. However, in working
with the City to resolve safety and convenience issues the final design provides for two-way
ingress and egress into each area, and adequate visibility for cars entering and exiting the site.
Given the constraints of the site with respect to size, topography and its location on P.C.H.
this was determined to be the best solution. Further, each level and the entire project itself
will generate fairly low levels of traffic volume, allowing this configuration to work safely
and conveniently.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The owner/developer of the property specifically chose this site to relocate a successful auto repair
business, Swedish Pro -Tech, to a more desirable location closer to the customer base. Certain
attributes of the location are ideal for this type of use, as it does not directly abut any residential
property, and it is located on a P.C.H. corner allowing access via a stop -light. On the other hand,
the adjacent commercial uses while compatible, are primarily offices, not an ideal neighboring use.
Also, while the property does not directly abut any residential uses, a single-family residential
neighborhood is located to the southeast along 21st Street, and a multi -family apartment is located
directly across 21st Street to the South. These various factors warrant careful consideration of the
proposed use and its operation. Therefore, in order to address these compatibility issues, staff is
recommending standard conditions for auto repair operations and some site specific conditions.
The applicant has provided a description of several use and operational characteristics of the
proposed business. The following are the most prominent characteristics identified by staff that
distinguish this from a typical general auto repair use and/or address neighbors concerns:
• Operation hours: Mon -Fri 8AM-6PM - occasional Saturdays, No Sundays
• Maximum 5 on-site mechanics (one per service bay)
• Work by appointment (almost 100%)
• Test drives restricted to P.C.H. and other non-residential areas
• Tow -truck drop-offs directly inside facility
Other attributes mentioned, such as working indoors, proper disposal of oils and solvents, are
typical of all similar establishments, and requirements of local and/or state laws.
Another unique attribute related to the building design, is that the service bays are partially hidden
from view from the street and well setback from the street. This will contribute towards
minimizing noise, and will certainly lessen the visual impacts.
In recognition of the description submitted by the applicant, and in consideration of the proximity
of residential uses, staff is recommending conditions of approval which are consistent with typical
conditions imposes on other auto repair facilities in the City with some special unique additions for
this location. These include a maximum number of mechanics, specific limitations on locations
for test driving, directional signing to on-site parking and prevention of on -street • arking,
CON
Michael Schubach
Planning Director
di
OlA h.i .A1../4
Sol Blume .1d, r irector
Community
evelopment Department
Attachments
1. Proposed Resolution
2. Applicant Auto Repair description
3. Location Map
4. Photos/ Deeks Celvirewob
5. Negative Declaration & Initial Study
6. Application
7. Correspondence
Th
.
K n Robertson
Associate Planner
2Z
KRc:\pc\sr807
Project •ascription
Site Area: 6,810 square feet
Existing Use: Restaurant (Vacant)
Proposed Uses: Automobile Repair Facility
General Office
Subterranean Parking
Zoning: SPA 8 Commercial Zone
Second Tier Development
Floor Level
Project Analysis
Use
Exterior sf Gross sf
Basement
First Abor
Second Boa
Total
Parking 4557 sf
Restroom
Mechanical
Employees
Circulation
76 sf
59 sf
112 sf
156 sf 234 sf
Parking 2373 sf
Waiting Room
Repair Garage
Circulation 32 sf
Landscaping 400 sf
Office
Restrooms
Mechanical
Circulation
Roof Deck 328 sf
Storage 7C0 sf
300 sf
1898 sf
136 sf
1382 sf
280 sf
58 sf
108 sf
Gross Square Footage 4643 sf
Fbor Level
Parking
Compact Standard Total
Basement
First Roor
Total Parking
3
3
10
6
13
9
6
16
22
Total Parking
22 spaces
Allowable Building Area
Building Area / sf
250 sf / space
Allowable sf
5500 sf
Project exceeds required parking by 3 spaces
Landscape
400 sf / 6810 sf site =
5.9%
23
Adde im to City of Hermosa Beach
Master Development Application
Wiberg Development
Submitted: May 22, 1996
Revised August 8, 1996
RECEIVED
AUG 61996
PANNING DEPT.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
RECEIVED
AUG 8 1996
PLANNING DEPT.
1. Requested Use Approvals: The Applicant, Swedish Pro -Tech, Inc. ("SPTI")
requests a CUP and Precise Development Plan in the SPA 8 Commercial Zone to
construct and operate an automobile repair facility as follows:
a) Primary Uses
• Mechanical repair - automobiles only
• No body work repair
• On-site customers only - no third -party rebuilding
• Maximum of five internal garage bays
• Off-street (first -floor) parking court
• Underground (basement) parking
• Upper (second -floor) administrative support office
• 4,643 sq. ft (gross) facility
b) Parking and Customer Service
• On-site (off-street) internal parking - 9 cars
• Underground (internal) parking - 13 cars
• On-site (internal) customer service/waiting area
c) Hours of Operation
• Monday -Friday, 8 AM - 6 PM (full operation)
• Occasional Saturdays (average 1-2 times per month)
• Sundays - never open
• Steady annual clientele - no seasonal fluctuations
d) Employees
• Five full time on-site mechanics
• No on-site administrative staff
• No cleaning staff
e) General Operations: SPTI is a professionally managed repair facility. All
work and customer interaction are conducted in a carefully- controlled
environment:
• Work - almost 100% is by appointment
• Work location - All work conducted inside enclosed facility
• Customer drop off - on-site in underground or parking court areas
• Test drives - restricted to PCH and other non-residential streets
• Tow -truck drop-offs - directly inside the building, not on the street
• Scrap metal - Monthly hauling by licensed operator (small pick-up
truck)
• Oil wastes - Bi -monthly hauling by licensed operator (small tank
vehicle)
Oiteitt Swedish Pro -Tech Repair Facility Moss & Associates
807 21st -y' Consultant
e) General Operations (Contd. )
• Shop solvents - tri -monthly disposal by licensed hauler (small panel or
van -type truck)
• Noise - Mitigated by internal work locations
• Fumes Limited use of volatile substances
f) Indefinite CUP Grant: If renewal terms are specified in the CUP grant, the
Applicant requests that renewal be allowed by Administrative action of the
Director of Community Development upon a finding that continued operation
is consistent with, or that additional Administrative conditions can be imposed
which conform the use to current codes and policies in place at the end of the
original CUP grant.
The Applicant requests that any future additional landscaping, and general
interior or exterior site improvements that do not change substantive buildout
criteria be allowed without further action of the Commission or the Director.
g)
2. Project Applicant: SPTI initiated operations in 1988 and is State -certified by the
Bureau of Automotive Repair. This closely -held business is carefully managed by
Mr. Wiberg, who is one of the four factory- and/or dealer- trained on-site mechanics.
Mr. Wiberg is the project applicant and would continue to manage the business after
relocation to the site.
3. Description of Proposed Site - Existing Use and Improvements: The site has
been under continuous operation as a full-service restaurant for approximately 8-10
years. Hours of operation were 2 PM to 11 PM with 8 to 10 employees, seating for
90 patrons (all approximate), and an outside patio. Wholly inadequate on-site parking
was restricted to 4 spaces and adjacent public and private properties were used for
parking overflow. The community experienced off-site impacts, including noise and
parking.
4. Description of Existing Site - Proposed Use and Improvements: The existing
site has been subjected to numerous design studies over the past year by a licensed
professional architect to insure minimal off-site impacts of noise, parking, light, glare
and view.
a) Parking:
• Total of 22 (street -level parking court = 9 including bays; 13 =
basement)
• Site is "overparked" by code requirements by 3 spaces
b) Landscaping and Open Space:
• Proposed landscaping is 400 sq. ft. (5.9% site)
• Adjacent properties are buffered from the proposed structure by liberal
setbacks
Swedish Pro -Tech Repair Facility
807 21st
Moss & Associates
Consultant
c) Traffic and Circulation:
• Access is restricted to one new curb cut on 21St St. that provides clear
vehicular path of travel down to the basement parking area or up to
the parking court
• Signage will direct patrons to on-site parking and mitigate use of street
parking or street loading
5. Operation - Comparison to Restaurant Use
ISSUE AREA
RESTAURANT
SPTC
RELATIVE IMPACT-SPTI
Days
Monday -Sunday
Monday -Friday
Less Impact
Hours
3 PM - 11 PM
8 AM - 6 PM
Less Impact
Seasonal/Increased Use
Thurs., Sat, Sun
No
Less Impact
Staff Hours
2 PM - 12 AM
Occasional Saturdays
Less Impact
Security
None
Electronic security, on-
call patrol, security
windows/doors
Greater Security
Parking
4 on-site spaces;
off-site and street
use
22 spaces:. 3>city
code
Less Impact
6. Site Control: SPTI has purchased the site and is fee owner
7.. Project Goals and Suggested Mitigation Measures: The Applicant proposes to
continue to operate a professionally managed and fully licensed automobile repair
facility, in this, their eighth year of operation. The following mitigation measures are
already a part of the project description and mitigate potential impacts of the
proposal:
I. Access, Circulation and Parking
a) Construct on-site parking areas at greater than City code
requirements.
b) Locate curb cut and parking ramps to maximize line of site and
minimize queuing onto 21st street.
c) Dedicate vehicular and pedestrian paths of travel to insure safe
circulation and access.
d) Provide on-site signage to direct patrons to on-site parking and
prevent street parking and loading.
e) Only use PCH and non-residential streets for test drives by authorized
SPTI personnel.
401361 Swedish Pro -Tech Repair Facility
807 2151
3
2-6
Moss & Associates
Consultant
7. Project Goals and Suggested Mitigation Measures (contd.)
II. Compatibility with Neighborhood
a) Limit number of employees to five full-time mechanics.
b) Limit and reduce hours of operation from existing restaurant use.
c) Localize all repair work interior to the structure.
d) Maximize setback of repair bays from multi -family residential
structures (distance to existing units on south side of 21st St. is 125 ft).
e) Continue to use licensed haulers for metal, oil and other liquid wastes.
f) Propose building massing at less gross footage than allowed by City
codes.
4
Swedish Pro -Tech Repair Facility
807 21"
27
Moss & Associates
Consultant
Dean Nota Architect AIA V310-376-2352 1J8/14/96 010:16 AM DIM
Nota / Lee Ar tests, Los Angeles Page 1 .
Mail:: 2465 Myrtle Avenue
Hermosa Beach, California, USA 90254
Voice: 310.374.5535
Facsimile: 310.376.2352
FAX MEMO
Date: August 14, 1996
To: City of Hermosa Beach
Community Development Department
1315 valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Attention: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Community Development
Department
Facsimile: 937-6235
Regarding 807 21 st Street
Hermosa Beach
Pages 3 including this page
Message: Here is a copy of a letter that has been sent to the owner's representative of the
building at 2200 PCH for your information and for the Planning Commission
Packets.
Thank you,
Dean Nota
Member: American Institute of Architects
08/14/96 10:15 TX/RX NO.0498 P.001
•
Dean Nota Architect AIA 1Q 310-376-2352 l il8/14/96 010:16 AM D2/3
Nota / Lee An :acts, Los Angeles Page 2.
Mail: 2465 Myrtle Avenue
Hermosa Beach, California, USA 90254
Voice: 310.374.5535
Facsimile: 310.376.2352
Date: August 14, 1996
Via: Facsimile and US Mail
To: Mr. Terry Teeple
Pacific -Teal Development Inc.
22672 Lambert Street, Suite 616
Lake Forest, CA 92630
Regarding: Proposed Auto Repair Facility
807 21st Street, Hermosa Beach, California
Dear Terry:
Thank you for meeting with me to review the project plans, including the elevations,
sections and design of the proposed automobile repair facility on Monday, August
12, 1996. The plans that you reviewed are identical to those on file with the City
and upon which the hearing notice for the August 20, 1996 hearing is based.
We understand that (1) you represent the Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company
of Omaha Nebraska who owns the commercial office building behind the subject
site known as 2200 PCH and (2) your client, and its property manager the Charles
Dunn Company of Irvine, California have engaged you to review the proposed
project and insure that the project is sensitive to the 2200 building uses, and (3)
your review is supposed to take into account the property rights of the proposed
project as it relates to the underlying commercial zoning.
As we discussed at the meeting, the project applicant, Mr. H&kan Wiberg has
chosen to work with my office to create a well-designed project which is sensitive
to neighborhood compatibility issues and meets or exceeds all City zoning and
planning requirements. We have been very careful during the many design studies
of this site to accomplish the goals of the client without compromising the
appearance of the project from all adjacent properties. And, we understand that
you have already reviewed the comprehensive Project Overview which outlines all
operational aspects of the proposed use. In particular, the project exhibits the
following characteristics:
• Stepped building facade which minimizes view and massing impacts
• All roof points are well below the allowable height limit of 35 feet from grade
• The FAR is below 1.0
• The site is overparked (3 extra spaces) for the proposed uses, and
• Landscaping is provided in excess of minimum requirements.
During the meeting you mentioned four design issues that were of concern to your
clients, and we would like to provide the following formal responses to these
concerns.
1. Rooftop mechanical equipment: Rooftop equipment will most likely be
placed on the parts storage roof where it will be screened by the stair
tower and parapets that surround this roof. We plan to commit to all
reasonable and usual mitigation required by staff and expect that such
mitigation will be set forth in the final conditions of approval.
Member: American Institute of Architects
08/14/96 10:15
7-9
TX/RX NO.0498 P.002
I
Dean Nota Architect AIA V310-376-2352 R18/14/96 010:17 AM D3/3
Nota / Lee Ar. :acts, Los Angeles Page 3.
2. Side wall - North Elevation: This wall is somewhat higher than it needs to
be. The purpose of this wall is for security and to screen our roof deck
from your client's open parking deck directly adjacent and to the north.
We believe that it has minimal view impact to your client's property. But, it
can be lowered twenty four inches at your request.
3. Rear Stairway: This project must provide a second exit from the second
floor office and underground parking as well as access to the parts
storage roof as required by the Uniform Building Code. Although this stair
will impact some view from the first floor of your client's building, it is still
5' - 8" lower than the allowable height limit in this location.
4. View Impacts from Your Site: We have carefully massed the building well
below the maximum allowable height and provided four complete cross-
sections, not the single section usually required by the City. We feel that
every attempt has been made to maintain most private views from your
client's site which occupies a higher relative elevation and was constructed
when the code allowed much higher structures in this zone. We have
limited the buildout on our site and hence, reduced our final project value
by not taking advantage of total massing allowed by City codes.
I understand that you may be requesting that the Planning Commission continue
the August 20 hearing in order to provide you and your client with additional time to
review the project. My client has vowed to assist you with timely review of the
project. We feel that your client hired you to review the project and that you should
feel free to formally pose any additional questions to us orally or in writing, and we
will do our best to provide complete and professional answers prior to or during the
public hearing.
We do not understand what you hope to accomplish by continuing the hearing, but
we offer you our full cooperation in your continued review of this exciting project.
We feel that the project exceeds the usual design criteria set forth by the City codes
and that any attempt to delay the project may result in unnecessary costs to my
client.
Thank you again for allowing Nota / Lee Architects to assist with your review.
Please call if I can provide any additional information.
Sincerely,
Dean Nota AIA
cc Dr. David E. Moss, Moss and Associates
Mr. Heiken Wiberg
Mr. Sol Blumenfeld, Community Development Director, Via fax / hand delivery
Mr. Ken Robertson, Senior Staff Planner, Via fax / hand delivery
Member: American Institute of Architects
08/14/96 10:15
30
TX/RX N0.0498 P.003
1
N
cc
0 R-1
V -
z
ti
f#L
HILLCREST
U
J
a_
R-1
R -I = I-
N t W
W
I 2
z la
; I-
PROSPECT
R- I
R-1
R -I
R -I
R -I
R -I
PACtF'IC C
11...rte-
R-3
O
R-1
ADDRESS: SO-7 DATE: ! 13 I /6-'
c. - Loc, x -►ti �Y�
City of Hermosa Beach
Memorandum
To: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner
From: Joe Mankawich, Capital Improvement Program Engineer
Date: August 12, 1996
Re: 807 21st Street
The Public Works Department has reviewed the revised plans for 807 21st Street and has
found them to have corrected the public works related problems associated with the
original design. Both ramps have been widened to accept two-way traffic, the unusable
parking spaces in the underground parking area have been eliminated and street parking
too close to the intersection have been removed. No further public works required
changes are necessary at this time. I have given Dean the number ((818) 458-3953) for
Frank Lott of the L.A. County Public Works Department so that he may inquire about the
required relocation of the County catch basin on 21st Street. Please call me if further
information is required from Public Works.
33
ACTIVITY IDENTIFICATION
Location
a. Address: 807 21st Street
b. Legal: Lots 9 & 10 and portions of 8 & 11, Tract No. 2143
Description
Precise Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to construct a 6_000 square foot commercial office building
and auto repair facility with two levels of parking
Sponsor
a. Name: Dean Nota, Architect
b. Mailing Address: 2465 Myrtle Avenue, Hermosa, CA 90254 Phone: (310) 376-2352
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
In accordance with Resolution 89-5229 of the City of Hermosa Beach, which implements the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970 in Hermosa Beach, the Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental review of all private
projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, and the Planning Commission must make an environmental review of all
public projects proposed to be undertaken within the City, which are subject to the Environmental Quality Act. This
declaration is documentation of the review and, if it becomes final, no comprehensive Environmental Impact Report is
required for this project.
FINDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance with Resolution
89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project doe)ot require a comprehensive Environmental
_ Impact Report because it would not have a significant effect on the environ 'ent. Documentation supporting this finding is on
file in the Community Development Department, Planning Division.
6-12- 9b
Date of Finding
airman, EnvironmentaYReview Committee
FINDING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance with Resolution
89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental
Impact Report because it would not have a significant effect on the enviro t. Documentatio supporting this finding is on
file in the Community Development Department, Planning Division.
9 -17- s�
Date of Finding Chairman, Planning C•mmission
FINDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
We have undertaken and completed an Environmental Impact Review of this proposed project in accordance with Resolution
89-5229 of the City Council of Hermosa Beach, and find that this project does not require a comprehensive Environmental
Impact Report because it would not have a significant effect on the environment. Documentation supporting this finding is on
file in the Community Development Department Planning Division.
Date of Finding Mayor, Hermosa Beach City Council
3cF
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title: P.D.P. 96-4, C.U.P. 96-8
Construction of a new 6,000 square -foot multiple use commercial building with 24 parking spaces,
containing both auto repair and office uses.
2. Project Location: 807 21st Street, at the corner of 21st and Pacific Coast Highway
3. Project Sponsor: Wiberg Development
4505 Manhattan Beach Blvd.
Lawndale, CA 90260
4. Lead Agency : City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
5. Contact Person: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner - (310) 318-0242
6. General Plan Designation: General Commercial 7. Zoning: S.P.A.8, General Commercial
Specific Plan Area
8. Description of Project: A Precise Development Plan for construction of a new multi level multiple use
commercial building with 2 to 3 levels above basement parking. The building will include 2,954 square feet
of gross office floor area, and 2,993 gross square feet of auto repair related facilities, including auto repair
garage space for 5 cars. The subject site is 6,810 square feet. A Conditional Use Permit is being requested
for the auto repair use, while office use is permitted by right. The building will replace an existing
restaurant nonconforming to parking.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: The subject site is located on the east side of Pacific Coast
Highway, at the northeast corner of P.C.H. and 21st Street. Commercial uses are located to the north
(offices and auto repair) and across P.C.H. to the west (office and retail) and immediately to the east (3
story office building). Residential uses are located to the east beyond the office building and across 21st
Street to the south. The P.C.H. corridor is a highly travelled urban corridor, located in an urban setting,
consisting of primarily strip commercial development, which includes several automotive related uses such
as sales, repair, and parts sales..
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation
agreement.) Coastal Commission
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is
a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
❑ Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation El Public Services
El Population and Housing El Biological Resources El Utilities and Service Systems
El Geological Problems ❑ Energy and Mineral Resources El Aesthetics
❑ Water El Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources
❑ Air Quality El Noise ❑ Recreation
El Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, that there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environmental, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1)
has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a
"potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be
a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an
earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier
EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Date
ski/
For
111
CI
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects
like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be
explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose
sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well
as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there
are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the mitigation
measure has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact". The lead
agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than
significant level (mitigation measures from section XVII, "Early Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are
discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential
impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should,
where appropriate, include reference to the page where the statement is substantiated. See the sample question
below. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the
discussion.
7) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different ones.
SAMPLE QUESTION:
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving:
Landslides or mudslides? (1, 6)
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
❑ ❑ 0 0
(Attached source list explains that 1 is the general plan, and 6 is a
topographic map. This answer would probably not need further
explanation.)
37
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in vicinity?
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low income or
minority community)?
The proposed use complies with the SPA -8 zoning and is consistent with the General Commercial
designation on the General Plan (1) (2)
H. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infrastructures?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
The addition of a commercial use of this size and area designated by the General Plan for this type of
commercial use will not impact any population projections or induce growth.
III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS.
Would the proposal result in or expose people to
potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture?
b) Seismic ground shaking?
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
38
El El ❑ M
El El ❑ M
El El ❑ M
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e) Landslides or mudflows?
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land?
h) Expansive soil?
I) Unique geologic or physical features?
❑ ❑ ❑ El
❑ 0 ❑ El
❑ ❑ ® 0
❑ 0 ❑ IZ
O 0 0 IZI
❑ 0 0 IZ
The project includes the demolition of the existing structure, and construction of a new building.
The construction of the below grade parking structure will also require excavation. These changes will be
required to conform to Zoning, Building and Safety and Public Works requirements for shoring, retaining
walls, soil stability, grading, drainage, and disposal of excavated materials which will ensure that the
impacts on a project of this scale will be less than significant The site does not contain any unique soil or
geologic features
IV. WATER Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability?
3?
O ❑ ® ❑
O 0 0 El
O 0 0 IZ
O 0 0 IZI
❑ ❑ 0 IZ
O 0 0 IZ
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
g)
Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality?
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Drainage patterns, absorption rates and surface runnoff will be modified as a result of the proposed
construction as compared to the current use which, includes some exposed soil. Overall the changes in surface
water flows will be less than significant, and will be required to meet the requirements of the Public Works
Department for stormwater runoff.
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause
any chance in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors?
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ El
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Potential air quality impacts come from two potential sources, the automobile traffic generated from the
project, and the auto repair operations. In regards to the automobile traffic, and referencing the trip
generation figures below, total trip generation is actually less with the proposed use than continued restaurant
use. In regards to stationary sources generated at the site, the project will be limited to general auto repair, no
body work or painting is proposed
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g. farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ® 0
❑ 0 0 IZI
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
0 Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g)
Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
❑ El ❑ El
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ El
❑ ❑ ❑
Vehicle trips may potentially increase from the proposed commercial uses as compared to potential continued
use as a restaurant. The table below summarizes the different trip rates based on the ITE trip generaion
manual (3)
Average Trips per ITE manual
Total average vehicle trip actually decrease when comparing the proposed uses to the potential of continuing
the existing land use. Also the average trips during A.Mpeak hour decrease and during the P.M peak are the
same.
The new driveway access is being moved to the east, displacing one on -street parking space. The new location
is generally safer for entering and exiting vehicles as it is more off -set from Pacific Coast Highway. However,
movements down the ramp to the lower parking begin immediately on the left side of the driveway, creating
potential conflicts at this entry point. Given the low frequency of trips in and out of the facility, this conflict
will cause inconvenience, but should not result in significant hazards.
VH. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees) ?
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ Cl
Existing
(2600 Sq. Ft. Restaurant)
Proposed
(3000 Sq. Ft. Auto Repair, + 3000
Sqare Feet Office)
Weekday
249
138
Saturday
240
37
Sunday
187
8
Peak A.M. Hour
27
17
Peak P.M. Hour
19
19
Total average vehicle trip actually decrease when comparing the proposed uses to the potential of continuing
the existing land use. Also the average trips during A.Mpeak hour decrease and during the P.M peak are the
same.
The new driveway access is being moved to the east, displacing one on -street parking space. The new location
is generally safer for entering and exiting vehicles as it is more off -set from Pacific Coast Highway. However,
movements down the ramp to the lower parking begin immediately on the left side of the driveway, creating
potential conflicts at this entry point. Given the low frequency of trips in and out of the facility, this conflict
will cause inconvenience, but should not result in significant hazards.
VH. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees) ?
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ Cl
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
c) Locally designed natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
O 0 0 M
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? 0 0 ❑
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
O 0 0 M
The site is currently a fully developed site in urban setting, and contains minimal vegetation or
habitats for any flora or fauna.
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful an
inefficient manner?
c) Results in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the and the
residents of the state?
O 0 0 M
O 0 0 M
O 0 0 M
Based on submitted plans, and the size and scale of projects, and given that the project will have to
comply with Title 24 requirements, no impacts are anticipated
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous ❑ 0 M ❑
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan ❑ ❑ 0 M
or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health ❑ 0 0 M
hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential ❑ 0 M 0
health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, 0 0 0 M
grass, or tress?
Auto repair operations will require storage and disposal of oils, coolants, etc, and some limited
exposure to the materials to employees and customers. The operation will be subject to Federal and State laws
4-Z
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
regarding handling and disposal of these materials, reducing the level of this impacts to less than significant
levels.
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
Potential increases in noise levels, from auto repair operations may be anticipated These noise levels are less
than significant because repair operations will be conducted indoors and be further buffered by the internalized
location of the parking courtyard and also should not be significant relative to ambient levels generated by
traffic on P.C.H..
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e) Other governmental services?
❑ ❑ ® ❑
❑ ❑ ® ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ El
❑ ❑ ® ❑
❑ ❑ ® ❑
The construction of this new building will marginally increase the need for all these services. This is
anticipated to be less than significant, and easily handled by existing resources and facilities. These
impacts are also partially mitigated by various City required fees, and taxes that will be generated from
this project
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or
supplies, substantial alterations to the following
utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communications systems?
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
4-3
❑ ❑ ❑IZ
❑ ❑ ❑ El
El ❑ ❑ El
El ❑ ❑
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
e) Storm water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
g) Local or regional water supplies?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
❑ ❑ ® ❑
Cl ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
None of these facilities except for the stormwqter drainage will be impacted Stormwater will be
marginally impacted both relative to quantity and quality.. Stormwater volumes may marginally increase, but
as noted above the site is already mostly paved, so this is not anticipated to be significant. The quality could be
impacted by improper disposal of oils and coolants use by the auto repair facility, by compliance with federal,
state and local laws relative to disposal, and use of an oil separator for parking lot runoff reduces this impact
of be less than significant..
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c) Create light or glare?
Cl ❑ ® ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ El
❑ ❑ ® ❑
The proposed development wil be compatible with surrounding office and commercial uses, and thus
the appearance is expected to be compatible. The placement of a multi-level at this location will modify
some northerly views from the residential apartments located to the south. Given the scale of existing
sourrounding development, however, this modification will only marginally change these views.
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources?
b) Disturb archaeological resources?
c) Affect historical resources?
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
No impacts on cultural resources are anticipated
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ Cl ❑ El
❑ ❑ ❑ El
❑ ❑ ❑ El
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
No impacts are anticipated.
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)
d) Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑ ❑ El
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on
attached sheets:
y�S
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
following are sources used in the evaluation, and are available in the Commumity Develop
Department.
1. General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach (Land Use Element revised 1994) including
the General Plan Map
2. City of Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance
3. ITE Trip Generation Manual.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document
and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
Authority: Public Resources Code Sections 21083 and 21087.
Reference: Public Resources Code Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21082.1. 21083,
21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21151; Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino, 202 Cal. App. 3d 296
(1988); Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors, 222 Cal. App. 3d 1337 (1990).
y/c:cklist
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
PROJECT ADDRESS 807 21st Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Project Name (If applicable) Wiberg Development
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 9 & 10 , Portions of Lots 8 & 11 ZONING SPA 8
Tract No 2143, City of Hermosa Beach
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name(s) Dean Nota Architect AIA Phone310-374-5535
Mailing Address 2465 Myrtle Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Applicant's Relationship to Property Archi t ec t
*I have inquired about the need to obtain a Coastal Development Permit from the
Coastal Commission, and understand I do do not xx require a permit.
DATE M ZZI ICiAb
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
PROJECT REQUEST
x Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) (3812)
C.U.P. - Condominium of Units (3812)
C.U.P. - Amendnient/Amortization (3805)
C.U.P. - Minor Amendment (3899)
C.U.P. - Fences & Walls (3864)
X Environmental Staff Review (3803)
_ Final Map (3810)
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change (3811)
Height Limit Exception (3898)
Lot Line Adjustment (3884)
Nonconforming Remodel (3866)
Parking Plan (3857)
Permitted Use Request (3885)
Planning Commission Appeals (3888)
X Precise Development Plan (3867)
Tentative Map - Subdivision/Lot Split (3809)
Tentative/Final Map/C.U.P. Extension (3883)
Text Amendment, Private (3886)
Variance (3808)
Voluntary Lot Merger (3887)
300' Radius Noticing - 1st Noticing (3868)
300' Radius Noticing - 2nd Noticing (3890)
Total Fees
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (attach additional pages if necessary)
Three story commercial development consisting of a five bay auto repair
facility, office space and subterranean parking. See attached dettaakW
description.
FOR.OFFICE USE <ONLY - RECEIVED BY DATE OF SUBMITTAL:
1016 ...8..9 .
r i. t tiNG D T
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT (Signature required from current PROPERTY OWNER of owner in esc •
Name Hakan Wi berSignature /� '
Address 4505 Manhattan Beach Blvd. Lawndale CA 90260411011
Telephone 310-536-0339
NATURAL RESOURCES
(State Designated Form)
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To be completed by applicant)
Type or Print Legibly
Date Filed T•Iay 22, 1996 - Revised August 8, 1996
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor:
RECEIVED
AUG 8 1996
PLANNING DEPT.
Hakan Wiberg
4505_4anhattan Beach Blvd., Lawndale, CA 90260
2. Address of project:
807 21st Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this
project: Dean Nota Architect AIA 310-374-5535
2465 Myrtle Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form
pertains:
5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required
for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal
agencies:
6. Existing zoning district: SPA, 8 (Second Tier Development)
7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed):
Auto Repair Facility (Swedish Pro -Tech Volvo / Saab Service)
Offi r`P Riii 1 riina and subt_erranaan Parking_
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
8. Site size:
5.X10 square feet
9. Square footage
5947 gross square feet building / 4,472 sf parking
4,543 4,JD
10. Number of floors of construction Throo Two
11. Amount of off-street parking provided: 2 1
12. Attach plans.
cpa. c
22 spaces
9-g
13. Proposed scheduling: Construction Fall 1996
14. Associated projects: None
15. Anticipated incremental development: None
16. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, and type of
household size expected: Not Residential
17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally
orientated square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities: Regional sales of auto parts related to auto repair
and service.
18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading
facilities: Not industrial
19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift,
estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived
from the project: Not institutional
20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state
this and indicate clearly why the application is required:
CUP and PDP required by Zoning Code
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all
items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
YES NO
21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or
hills or substantial alteration of ground contours.
Site will be excavated to accommodate subgrade parking.
X 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas
or public lands or roads.
X 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
X 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
X 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or
_ L
quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns.
27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the
vicinity.
28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more.
_ 29. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic
substances, flammables or explosives. Auto repair and maintenancE
will require storage and disposal of oils, coolants etc.
_ 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire,
water, sewage, etc.).
X 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil,
natural gas, etc.).
X 32. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information
on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical
or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use
of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos
will be accepted. Site contains existing vacant house that was converte
to a restaurant and exterior tent structure. Structures and parking
are substantially non-compliant with current zoning and Uniform
Building Code requirements. No cultural, historical or scenic features
34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals
and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use
(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment
houses, shops, department stores, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity.
Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. See Site Plan
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the
attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation
to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
DATE May 22, 1996
(Signature)
NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 21803 and 21807, Public Resources Code.
Reference: Sections 21000-21176, Public Resources Code.
2110 Borden Avenue
Hermosa Beach,CA 90254
June 10, 1996
Sol Blumenfield, Director
Community Development Department
Planning Division
City of Hermosa Beach
Dear Mr. Blumenfield,
RE proposed construction of 6,000 square foot
building with auto repair and office uses
at 807 21st Street.
RECEIVED
J U L 1 5 1996
PLANNING DEPT.
Yfri
I am the owner and occupant of the house at the
corner of 21st and Borden, a short block from the pro-
posed building.
There would be increased traffic and parking problems.
21st Street for three blocks from the highway to Prospect
is already full on both sides most of every day, with
additional parking on Rhodes and Hillcrest. Street -sweep-
ing days cause additional difficulties.
The garage of course will bring additional traffic,
air pollution, dirt and noise beyond that generated by
offices. There would also be congestion of cars going
in and out of the garage at that very busy corner. The
Traffic Department could tell you that it is not unusual
to be called to that location because of accidents at the
present time.
I AM VERY MUCH OPPOSED TO THE CONSTRUCTION AS
PROPOSED.
Respectfully 9upt0,
/frgolitf,ria Z.- &-e-,
P.S. It is my understanding that there is a high vacancy
Yate among the offices in the very large structure adjoin-
ing this site.
SUPPLEMENT4
INFORMATION
1
4.•
itlir�r(�y; r��4hFa.y-wu
�\AAAI► re, liiiteMIIVAIrk ��
wa is a aC� X11/7
AUG 1 5 196
SYSTEMS TEC ° LOGY, INC.
13766 SOUTH HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD , HAWTHORNE, CALIFORNIA 90250-7083
E -Mail: 74053.3672@COMPUSERVE.COM PHONE (310) 679-2281 • FAX (310) 644-3887
Sol Blumenfeld, Director
Community Development Department
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Dr.
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Re: Proposed CUP - Swedish Pro -Tech, Inc.
Dear Mr. Blumenfeld,
15 August 1996
This letter is in regards to the above referenced automobile repair facility that is
proposed for the old restaurant site South of Artesia and on the East side of PCH. I have
known Haan Wiberg, the owner of Swedish Pro -Tech, for a number of years as I am a
Volvo owner and he has been my mechanic. He runs a very neat and clean shop in
Lawndale, and is quite considerate of his neighbors. I live on Gould Terrace in Hermosa
Beach which is nearby Hakon's proposed new location. I think this facility would be
generally a good addition to the Hermosa Beach business community, and also a good
neighbor for nearby residents like myself.
I would highly recommend granting a permit to Hakon to conduct his mechanical
repair business on PCH near my home. Hermosa Beach would be well served by his
location in our community.
Sincerely yours,
SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
R. Wade Allen
President and Technical Director
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
4
TERRANCE W. DUSHENKO, Ph.D.
Main Office: 25550 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 212
Torrance, CA 90505 •
Phone: (310) 375-3884 / (310) 375-0082
Pax: (310) 375-0343
CIIntcal Neuropsychology
• .nr. . . .. •'+` •�'r'R.NA.
Psychological Assessmem
Consutttng •Psychotherapy
August 9, 1996
RECEIVED
AUG 1 5 1996
To Whom it May Concern: )LANNPA$ t ZPT.
I am writing at this time to express unequivocal support for Mr.
Hokan Wiberg's desire to construct an automotive repair shop at the
corner of PCH and 21st Street in Hermosa Beach. I It has been my
pleasure to have been a customer at Mr. Wiberg's Saab/Volvo repair.
shop for 8 years. I was initially referred to him by a neighbor
who was impressed by Hokan's knowledge, honesty, and integrity.
My experience has confirmed and extended these impressions.
Hokan's work has consistently been dramatically less expensive than
estimates by dealerships or other independent mechanics. I have
never had unauthorized work done by his staff, nor have I ever been
*dissatisfied with any work done. All Work has been discussed with
me first and left to my final decision. Rarely has anything done
with the car taken.longer than estimated, and when it has, I have
been informed beforehand and provided with a loaner car or other
transportation as needed.
Hokan and his staff are always courteous, his shop is spotless, and
his work bay quieter and cleaner than one would imagine possible in
such an environment. His standards are impeccable, which, along
with his extensive knowledge, is certainly why his walls are
covered with thank you letters from pleased customers. I have also
had the pleasure of meeting many other customers of his over the
years, and have found that we virtually all are astonished to have
discovered someone who is so service oriented' that he could teach
courses in customer satisfaction., Although this may sound like
hyperbole, I do not have any financial interest or other motive
whatsoever in providing this depiction of Mr. Wiberg.• I simply
believe that he is an honorable businessman, who will be qn asset
to the community of Hermosa Beach (where I, myself have resided for
nearly 9 years). If I can be of any further assistance, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
T nn FRI
Ter -:nce . Dus enko, Ph.D.
L tensed -Clinical and Neuropsychologist
and .
Director, Dept. of Behavioral Medicine
St. Mary Medical Center, Long Beach, CA.90813
Offices In Santa Monica, Long Beach and Torrance
CA License # PSY8397
wg • TwD
A -A
1...445e -A P57
Cakgr
5. Kroa& 3 gr8f4-
CFF'itiE ENKA' MC>
srbo.
refl.'s& crrvra•
67:a.. 7-7
-18415sN*.
ere,
514114034.60
s'•
••;%`0- •
11
Li I
rn
L J00
-1-"'
0 •
4
....ZeCOS*17.
7 5716r
PARTS 616646E
ekes. Pies"- ••,131sy
FEPAire.
214cti ,rragif
CilEg-P1VI'ktosa
AVSO SC -0,6e
eAR.46E
P
4
z
,
)urs -J&' SE:ehr-
4Prie-E 1.7.1n,2IN6,
...ke•rikr6e
ref-49Sb
4— ode-
s—
?Taft LaPS
Plumvsst.
PHLT-n-ki
Caw -
(m,
4E.4•T61.-16^C•
j/'\
47> \
Pr4vE ZSlitror-
1*1t3Viustimer,
rt._ IT., wire
I
L_
s- 441.41e'
E__Zier.i. I
0
L
Ls".Z.c1";0•1 5,6
e651e46. 15US ST2/4..
-->
.ecTho
pAIFICC22A4r ti H WAY
:4ttlf1-045.
WW1 -WV"
FESIDENTIAL.
iginsirrt46 -
MU sin- OPT'
PE,TIA
4Irf.Y
0
RECEIVED
- AUG 8 1996
Pa. i104141 i(.2 Liter.
No / Lee Ambitoea Los Angeles
—
Mak 2465 Wile Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Voce. 310.374.5535
Facmile: 310.376.2352
Rti9C1: Wiberg Development
Omer 1-iakan & Anna Mare Wit:erg
Site: 807 21st Street
1-iymosa Beach, CA 90254
Legal Lots 9 & 10
Dmcnotcn Portions of Lots 8 & 11
Tract 2143
City Of Hermosa Beach
- Project Description
asi Aca 6810 sq tre too
Eratu U • %cu. It (Vac..11)
1.14.o./ LtioS. Auk.° [144 Hew* r,....kty
Grua (Au
/....t.ro rale') ka•rkk
,'('fl r 4,48 rkrumper32:on3
Eu...,..1 ke 04&u8
Project Analysis
FiX1 Li....0 IS. Dleur sr- . Grces sl
E34,4 Pal -i- 45.67 sr
Reseccm 76 sf
Meaurca 50 el
ErroNan 112*1
Cialabon 156 el 234 el
Fist 11xy Pakiv . 2373 al
wateq Foam 3:0 al
%par Garauo 113418 el
• C834.:n :CIO 136 et
1.crkkaksakj 400 sl
Seccra ruu Oka 138261
Reaccres 283 el
Mazrenc.1 58*1
Cictlabm 108 d
Rod ace 328 el
51crajo 7(51*1
Total Gross Square Footage 4643 sr
Parking
Fkaa• Lod Cceoxt Stand/el 'luta
Oasarede 3 10 13
First Fix, 252
Total Parking 6 16 22
Allowable Building Area
Tula Pakr9 Bukirg Area / sr reaelate. st
22 spaces 250 al / space a 5500 sr
Proicct 0:coa8 ieauted oarkhg by 3 sfleCas
Landscape 400 sl / 6810 sl site e 5.0%
Date:
rcileticr -1, 1116
Revisixs:
Scafe.
1/6 = VC'
Riritat
,919111" -1, I ehtieli.
Site Plan
ew1032
4
1 Li I 1t'SF-i ".
F
P.
L—_
36a1,43J 0+7
<T RA66
_61._If 1331
OPEN 16
86AOM
Roof Plan
a
aI
X14:5
Second Floor Plan
U
0
I I
•
L
-
5647io J G -G"
L
46aT,cr: 3-6
First Floor Plan
.urs
rAQ1MG G)zasr Nl<UMV
J
.30.41) oa
6.
'-‘4"
m,,P„R
Caveat-
f f-iG114eR
Cpl
)Zr
�a 14F-e-HMk AL
6
ion
L±J
Basement Level Plan
Nod / Lee Architects Los Angeles
Mail: 2465 Myrtle Avenue
I-4, ta J Beech, CA 90254
Voice: 310.374.5535
FaCxnile: 310.376.2352
Project: Wiberg Development
OA"ner: H$kan & Anna Marie Wrbeig
Site: 807 21st Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Legal Lots 9 & 10
Description: Portions d Lots 8 & 11
Tract 2143
City d Hermosa Beach
Project Description
Ski Arm: 6810 sy rotut
Existing Use: F eslarnt tvaar43
Ptgps.: User AUunctria lip,7v FP.Xdy
Ge.3444 Ora.
Stltmvem PpMid
Zoniv SPA 8 Cormrda2aeo
Swed Taa De emrent
Project Analysis
Fiw Le,d Use 5deets1 Gress al
13a.orwe t Psi 4557 sl--
Rate rn 76.8
Mcdonal 50 0
6ON.% 112e
C4o.labcn 158 aY 7.348
F. FYa Pa$.1 2373s7
waled spam 30) 0
Rem, Garde 18980
C:atem 32 sf 136 C
1arkralyd 'Muf
SefcrC FVJa Ole 1382 el
Poolrooms 280:0
moths -cal 58 sr
Cro0 103 sl
Hat Deck 3280
SIaa1C 700 sl
Total Gross Squaw Footage 4643 at
Parking -
Flax Len:1 Cort:uc Stexted late
firerrod 3 10 13
Fra Roo 3 8 5
Total Parking 6 16 22
Allowable Building Area
Total Pall -9 Wang Area/ Ab.ee sl
22 spaces 250 at/'Pao. 4 5500 se
Reject eiocceds required peas g icy 3 spaces
Landscape 400 a/681081dt.e 5.9%
Date: . AV61.157 l 10116
Pevisions:
,vim ei...)
Scale: 1/13' = 1'-0'
Printed: AVeVST 11 1.1'16
Floor Plans
R.., Itoroti
-
SEr'eµ6.
1-6.stst•HT_L-6,rr na-e Hwy. Fitt:perry
rico,
L.
West Elevation
etavAnd.g.,
174, 6.7
p cm.
191. 16+ 6/
Irl/WPC066-
6144.
PAT4iV
74.6, Oi.00+
-4
t.'"esthr
34. tou,'
L -'-
41Doco
:i±-
;II
PP t.otesmv. I
111..o
AP-1AoGr.r-
p+pcpdy
.9rItuo61/ge
14C..111
8' -
Agoonsope.L.
16,45A1fV-
et. 61,11
c1R1.61e
61.6Y4766-
1,49. &TS
91- 19441,
North Elevation
et,
51.• to..3
1.9r
/../att,'
644r
COP,P.
a+16/siattr
"116.0'
4ow61- %As+ 46,EV+ 1PorFK1- 1.6.9
South Elevation
J6... 114
-91vo0 -tsweac
rAmper
roti
66.
-C.L.Prott6-
L-!._----_
t.91
6/0
15I.00
4
PTO/ —7"
e..64tFlt
-Pk 'IA.'
-JI
East Elevation
Nola / Leo Architects Los Angeles
2465 Myrtle Avenue
Fbrmosa Beech. CA 93254
Vdce: 310.374.5535
Facimile: 310 376.2352
Project: Wiberg Development
Omer: H8kan 8 Anna Mane Wberg
Site 807 21st Street
Hermosa Basch, CA 90254
LogLots 9 8 10
DPP:1106:P: Porticos of Lots 8 & 11
Tract 2143
Cry of Hermosa Beach
Data
RevLsions:
Sca/e: VS' = 1-0*
Rrited: - /.1K-ct4r -1,
11,1,5
Elevations
1
O1<f'Ie-G
-
P/!F•"INFS
L__ —
'VT" iMbe-
7�I
Section DD
PHFItiNb
EE1Nter
Iro1► Q�
EL. 1.34-47'
Section BB
5"•�riw-TOWER
7'1rG f er.R
et... 130.0'
gag, ►I.O>f,
ii 171.3
IA' IftecR.
Bi..sla'
ELEYATr�
AWPOIRS.
Ek 111.7'
-GL. 17043'
Iyr• Pi iaF _
EL. 1,,45.0'
rT;7 Iri e .
Llwrr
OEW', Limrt-
G mCA.. ,IW?
- 139.'31
E_L (4Z76'
y_ •LMIT
i
TCM'~
_F�Imu•'
rAR!`-IWi_
Section CC
Section AA
Nsh /Lee Architects Los Angeles
2465 Myrtle Ave -1m
l-ltIrnosa Beach. CA 90254
Voice: 310.374 5535
Fatima, 310 3762352
^ojccr Wiberg Development
Dams HAkat & Pma Marie Wlterg
Site 807 21st Street
Hermosa Beach. CA 90254
Legs Lots 9 & 10
Description: Portions of Lots 6 & t t
Tract 2143
GN c Fbrm � a Br -Ji
Dm: AuSlk r 1, 1.1.1e
Scala: 1B' = 1'-0'
Rated: Aa5s141- 'I , Iqq b
Sections
RECEIVED
OCT - 7 1996
CITY MGR. OFFICE
US F/Pee.
,(i1- rK-
„tc_ez,,t zr.-",e,"%v‘eiV '
2/- :;
G4ezft
,a€7'ifre g--aze,17
-�-�``•
aG�
2?-4:;e0e
SUPPLEMENTAL
aRMTIJa
G `e t
°"'k"-I^"\oSa 0.3eqc1
0
- FkLZ-1-'10-Q9
C;
, .
Cciut-7 R Q% -i -x Qr4-
RECEIVED
OCT - 8 1996
CITY MGR. OFFICE
l,(Q cmc t_,scikkt, to AL, �- S
cer"--^ c -LQ M t:+1;ti C)1 04 t<-‹
LjOe , : 4 0-'2r- QA ---7 S
P a S A-Gt GC/Ot -110 4:k_pcx:1-) t7.J2.;
1-(Q Quest (p.(4001_0_2
1) (Nrk or; .2.4 c5-1,t)A F C/1-1
�'`' q q
a_p 3-1-1
Co GI .Sd- � �. �
a 4-
3) 3N-1 e_c-e_s) g sz_o)t e cP-1 :0?
plreSL-R J-4-4 ck,R ih-r4szc4
p 0-Q s'i-t e
-
Sup/ /Qmeria,
AD--Y-sem
October 3, 1996
Regular Meeting
October 8, 1996
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING ON RE -CODIFIED MUNICIPAL
CODE AND ADOPT ORDINANCE
Recommendation:
It is recommended that, after conducting the public hearing, the City Council adopt the attached
ordinance adopting the new reformatted and renumbered Municipal Code.
Background:
At its meeting of September 10, 1996, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 96-1162-U as an
urgency matter thereby adopting the newly reformatted and renumbered Municipal Code which
enabled the new Code to take effect immediately in order to avoid confusion by staff and the public
as to its actual effective date and allowed the previous illogically formatted Code to be discarded
immediately. The re -codified Municipal Code does not create new laws or change any of the laws
currently in effect but merely presents the City's Code in a much more understandable and readable
manner. On the advice of the City Attorney, at that same meeting, a regular, non -urgency ordinance
was introduced in the normal manner, after first reading of the title, in order to preclude challenges at
any unlimited time in the future.
Government Code Section 50022.3 requires that after the first reading of the title of the adopting
ordinance, and of the title of the code to be adopted thereby, and of the title of the secondary codes
therein adopted by reference (which took place at the meeting of September 10), a public hearing
must be scheduled pursuant to Government Code Section 6066, which requires newspaper
publication of the public hearing notice once a week for two successive weeks. In compliance with
state law, the public hearing notice was published in the Easy Reader on September 19 and 26, and
copies of the primary code and the secondary (referenced) codes have been available in the City
Clerk's office for public review well beyond the state -mandated 15 -day -period preceding the hearing.
The regular ordinance (No. 96-1162), which was introduced September 10, is presented this evening
for Council adoption following the required public hearing.
Elaine Doerfling, City lerk
Noted:
fr
Stephen' (Er,' City i anager
ORDINANCE NO. 96-1162
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ENACTING
AND ADOPTING THE CODE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (WHICH CODE
CONSISTS OF REGULATORY, PENAL AND CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE
REGULATIONS AND PROVISIONS OF THE CITY AND PROVIDES FOR PENALTIES
FOR VIOLATIONS), AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 50022.2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE, TITLE 11,
(HEALTH AND SAFETY), DIVISION 1, (HEALTH CODE), AND DIVISION 2,
(GENERAL HAZARDS); UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND UNIFORM FIRE CODE
STANDARDS, 1994 EDITION; UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1994 EDITION;
UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, 1994
EDITION; UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 1994 EDITION; UNIFORM MECHANICAL
CODE, 1994 EDITION; NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, 1993 EDITION; UNIFORM
HOUSING CODE, 1994 EDITION; AND UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1994 EDITION, AS
SAID UNIFORM CODES AND SAID TITLES, DIVISIONS AND CHAPTERS OF THE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE, AND EACH OF THEM, ARE AMENDED AND IN
EFFECT ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1996, SAVE AND EXCEPT SUCH PORTIONS THEREOF
AS ARE DELETED, MODIFIED OR AMENDED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE
HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE; PRESCRIBING CERTAIN PENALTIES FOR
THE VIOLATION OF THE PROVISIONS THEREOF AND REPEALING CERTAIN
ORDINANCES AS SPECIFIED THEREIN.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN,
AS FOLLOWS;
SECTION 1 Adoption of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code.
That certain document entitled "Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, California", (hereinafter, "the
Code"), a copy of has been filed and is on file in the office of the City Clark for public inspection,
together with the secondary Codes therein adopted by reference, is hereby adopted by this
reference as the comprehensive ordinance Code for the City of Hermosa Beach pursuant to the
provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code of
the State of California, and each and all of the provisions, terms, and penalties of said Code on file
in the office of the City Clerk are hereby referred to, adopted, incorporated herein and made a part
of this ordinance as if fully set forth herein.
-1-
SECTION 2. Repeal of Certain Ordinances and Certain Ordinances to
Remain in Effect. All ordinances of the City in force upon the effective date of the Code are
hereby repealed except as follows:
(a) ordinances codified by the Code; and
(b) Uncodified ordinances comprising or amending the Zoning Map of the City of
Hermosa Beach, which are listed in the Uncodified Ordinance List on file in the
Office of the City Clerk; and
(c) Uncodified ordinances relating to matters of a special or temporary nature, which
ordinances are listed in the Uncodified Ordinance List on file in the Office of the
City Clerk; and
(d) All ordinances amending the Code adopted subsequent to Ordinance No. 96-1155,
comprising Ordinances 96-1156, 96-1157, 96-1158, 96,1159, 96-1160 and 96-
1161, which ordinances shall be codified and be incorporated into the Hermosa
Beach Municipal Code following its adoption as modifications thereto, the
incorporation and codification of said ordinances into said Code being hereby
authorized and approved; and
(e) Any uncodified ordinance promising or guaranteeing the payment of money or
authorizing the issue of bonds, or any evidence of the City's Indebtedness, or any
contract or obligation assumed by the City; and
(f) Any ordinance granting any franchise, license or other right conferred by the City on
any person or corporation, which franchise, license or other right is in effect as of
September 10, 1996; and
(g) Any uncodified administrative ordinance of the City Council not in conflict with the
provisions of the Code; and
(h) Any uncodified ordinance relating to the salaries, benefits, and working conditions
Of City officers and employees; and
(i) Any uncodified ordinance relating to the levy of any tax in effect as of September
10, 1996.
-2-
SECTION 3. Superseded Ordinances. All ordinances codified by the Code are
superseded to the extent they conflict with the Code.
SECTION 4. Savings Provisions. The repeal herein of any ordinance of the City
of Hermosa Beach shall not affect or impair any act done, or right vested or approved, or any
proceeding, suit or prosecution had or commenced in any cause before such repeal shall take effect;
but every such act done, or right vested or accrued, or proceeding, suit, or prosecution had or
commenced shall remain in full force and effect for all intents and purposes as if the applicable
provisions of the ordinance, or part thereof, so repealed had remained in force and effect. No
offense committed and no liability, penalty, or forfeiture, whether civilly or criminally incurred prior
to the time when any such ordinance, or part thereof, shall be repealed or altered by said Code,
shall be discharged or affected by such repeal or alteration. Prosecutions and suits for such
offenses, liabilities, penalties, or forfeitures shall be instituted and proceeded with in all respects as
if such prior ordinance, or part thereof, had not been repealed or altered.
SECTION 5. Penalty Provisions.
(a) Violations a Misdemeanor. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any
provisions or fail to comply with any of the requirements of the Code. Any person
violating any of the provisions or failing to comply with any of the mandatory
requirements of the Code shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, unless such violation is
otherwise in the Code as an infraction. Any person convicted of a misdemeanor
under the provisions of the Code shall be punishable by a fine of not more than one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment in the City or County jail for a
period not exceeding six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each
such person shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any
portion of which any violation of any provision of the Code is committed,
continued, or permitted by such person and shall be punishable accordingly.
(b) Public Nuisances. In addition to the penalties hereinabove provided, any condition
caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions of the Code shall be
-3-
deemed a public nuisance and may be summarily abated as such by the City, and
every day such condition continues shall be regarded as a new and separate offense.
(c) Infractions. Any violation of the Code deemed to be an infraction shall be
punishable by:
(1) A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100.00) for a first
violation;
(2) A fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200.00) for a second
violation of the same provision of the Code within one (1) year;
(3) A fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each
additional violation of the same provision of the Code within one (1)
year.
Any ordinance passed by the Council after July 1, 1984, which does not specify that its
violation constitutes a misdemeanor shall constitute an infraction as provided in this section.
(d) Included Offenses. Whenever in the Code any act or omission is made unlawful, it
shall include causing, permitting, aiding, abetting, suffering, or concealing the fact or
such act of omission.
SECTION 6. Any person, firm, corporation or association violating any of the
provisions of Los Angeles County Code, Title 11, Health and Safety, Division 1, Health Code, and
Division 2, General Hazards, as amended and in effect on September 10, 1996, adopted by
reference herein or violating any provision of any permit, license or exception granted thereunder
or failing to comply with any of the requirements thereof shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall
be punishable therefor by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by
imprisonment in the City or County jail for a period of not more than six (6) months, or by both
such fine and imprisonment. Each violation is a separate offense for each and every day during any
portion of which such violation is committed, continued, or permitted by such person.
SECTION 7. Violations. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation
to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip,
use, occupy or maintain any building or structure or cause or permit the same to be done in
-4-
violation of the Uniform Building code, the National Electrical Code, the Uniform Plumbing
Code, the Uniform Mechanical Code or the Uniform Housing Code, as amended and in effect on
September 10, 1996, and adopted by reference herein. Any such person, firm or corporation shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable as set forth in Title 1,
Section 1.12.010 of the Code of the City of Hermosa Beach, California.
SECTION 8. Violations.
(a) Every person violating any provision of the Uniform Fire Code as amended and in
effect on September 10, 1996, and adopted by reference herein, or of any permit or
license granted under that Code, or any rule, regulation or policy promulgated
pursuant to that Code, is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine
not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment in the City or
County jail for a term not exceeding six (6) months or by both such fine and
imprisonment. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the
violation or permit it to continue; all such persons shall be required to correct or
remedy such violations or defects within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise
specified, each ten (10) days that prohibited conditions are maintained shall
constitute a separate offense.
(b) The application of the above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced
removal of prohibited conditions.
SECTION 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective
of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
SECTION 10. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full
force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.
-5-
SECTION 11. Publication. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the
date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader,
a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach,
in the manner provided by law.
SECTION 12. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance of said city, and shall make minutes of the proceedings of the City
Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
vote.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of October, 1996, by the following
AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California.
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
-6-
SECTION 11. Publication. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the
date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader,
a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach,
in the manner provided by law.
SECTION 12. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance of said city, and shall make minutes of the proceedings of the City
Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
vote.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of October, 1996, by the following
AYES: Benz, Bowler, Edgerton, Reviczky, Mayor Oakes
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California.
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
-6-
October 1, 1996
Honorable Mayor and Members .City Council Meeting
of the Hermosa Beach City Council of October 8, 1996
PUBLIC HEARING FUNDING CITIZEN'S OPTION
FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM
The City Council set this item for Public Hearing for October 8, 1996. Staff has provided a more detailed
description of those items on the request list from the Chief of Police (Attachment B.)
It is recommended that City Council:
1. Use state funding under the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS)
Program for local police crime prevention programs.
2. Approve expenditure request list from Chief of Police and appropriate
$43,000 in COPS funds..
3. Establish a separate supplemental law enforcement service fund (SLESF)
through Finance.
4. October 8, 1996 - Public Hearing before final implementation.
BACKGROUND:
The COPS Program established by Assembly Bill 3229 appropriates $100 million from state general fund
for the 1996-97 Fiscal Year. The COPS Program provides funding for local agencies for the purpose of
ensuring public safety.
COPS is a permanent ongoing program. It will, however, require a new appropriation for continued
funding each fiscal year.
The State Controller shall allocate funds to each county by September 15, 1996. The funds in each county
shall be allocated to cities by October 15, 1996. Each city must establish a Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) for deposit of the funds received from the county. Seventy-five
percent of the funds will be allocated to the county and cities within the county for front line municipal
police services. Those funds shall be allocated based on population. The population for the county shall
be the population of the unincorporated area less the population in the eligible special districts.
The funds must be used for front line municipal police services and must supplement and not supplant
existing funding for front line municipal police services. Front line law enforcement services include
anti -gang and community crime prevention programs.
The city council shall hold a public hearing in September of each year starting in 1996 to consider these
requests. Funding will be determined by a majority vote of those present at the council meeting within 60
days of receiving the request for funding. The city council must consider these written requests separate
and apart from the proposed allocations from the city general fund.
6
Allocation Process
Each county must establish a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) for deposit of the
funds received from the State Controller. The county must request the funds after establishing the SLESF
and an oversight committee (details on the oversight committee included below). The State Controller
shall allocate the funding to each county no later than September 15, 1996.
Use of Funds
Cities are required to appropriate COPS revenues to fund front line municipal police services. Front line
law enforcement services include anti -gang and community crime prevention programs. These funds
shall be appropriated pursuant to written requests from the chief of police or the chief administrator of the
law enforcement agency that provides police services for that city. The request shall specify the front line
law enforcement needs of the requesting entity including the personnel, equipment and programs that are
necessary to meet those needs The revenues shall "supplement existing services" and shall not be used to
supplant, any existing funding for law enforcement services provided by that entity."
The allocation may not be used to fund the costs of any capital project or construction project that does not
directly support front line law enforcement services. The city shall not be allowed to alter any previous
appropriation by that body for the same fiscal year.
ANALYSIS:
Staff has prepared a needs assessment and request list in order to improve our local crime prevention
programs; neighborhood watch, D.A.RE. or similar programs. (Attachment A.)
FISCAL IMPACT:
The appropriation of $43,000 of COPS state revenue funding towards community crime prevention
programs. Moneys in this fund shall not be transferred to, or intermingled with any other fund in the city.
The treasurer of each city shall monthly detail and summarize allocations from the city's fund in a
written, public report filed with the supplemental law enforcement oversight committee, the city council,
and the police chief.
ly sutjnitted,
VAL STRASER, CHIEF OF POLICE
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Noted for Fiscal Impact:
VIM COPELAND, FINANCE DIRECTOR
2
Amir'
STEW I N BURRELL
CITY MANAGER
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE
CRIME PREVENTION REQUEST
NEEDS ASSESSMENT:
For many years this department has had limited involvement in a crime prevention
program. This has been due to limited budgets and personnel. The State funds we
are getting for crime prevention can be used to revitalize our program. To increase our
resources and materials to better educate residents and business owners. People of
all ages must be made aware of what they can do to prevent themselves, their families,
neighbors, and co-workers from being harmed by drugs, violence, and other crimes.
Effective crime prevention programs excel because of partnerships among law
enforcement, other government agencies, civic groups, schools, businesses, and
individuals as they help to rebuild a sense of communal responsibility and shared pride.
MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT:
Personal computer, printer and fax modem $3,500.00
(this would be used to set up a crime analysis and home page internet system)
Portable display unit and pop-up tent $7,000.00
(to be used at fairs, special events and crime prevention meetings).
Drug Abuse Resistance Education materials and promotional items $5,000.00
Crime prevention materials and equipment $10,000.00
(replace wom neighborhood watch signs, promotional materials, banners, signs.
pamphlets, and display units, etc.)
Crime prevention analysis program and mapping system $6,000.00
Cameras, fingerprint equipment and materials for child identification kits $2,500.00
Surveillance video equipment $4,000.00
(to monitor high crime, drug or vandalism areas)
Baseball style cards with officers pictures on them $2,000.00
South Bay Youth Project $3,000.00
(Counseling and related services for youth and their families)
•
Total $43,000.00
Attachment A
HERMOSA BEACH POLICE
CRI M E PREVENTION REQ U E S T
DESCRIPTION OF CRIME PREVENTION MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT:
Personal Computer, Printer and Fax Modem
This computer and related accessories would enable the police department to set up a
crime analysis program to track major crime trends, run a suspect identification
program, start a home page internet system, and do crime prevention related office
work.
Portable Display Unit and Pop-up Tent
This display unit would give the police department a means to set up a crime
prevention, D.A.R.E., or traffic safety display anywhere in the city. The display and
pop-up tent are easily transported to a site for set-up. The display could be put up at
major events, holidays or neighborhood watch meetings. The posters on the display
can be easily changed by using Velcro fasteners. You can also attach pamphlet
holders to display material at specific events.
Drug Abuse Resistance Education Materials and Promotional Items
The grant from the Beach Cities Health District covers the basic program and gives us
T-shirts, hand out materials an& conference fees. The city provides all salary and costs
not provided by the grant. We expanded our program to include the Jr. High grades at
Hermosa Valley and Our Lady of Guadalupe Schools. This doubled our student
numbers. The money requested from the COPS grant would supplement the Health
District's grant. We would be able to conduct field trips, bring in specially trained
teachers and speakers, conduct special self-esteem building programs, and buy
additional D.A.R.E. equipment and materials to promote the program in the community
and schools.
Crime Prevention Materials and Equipment
It has been many years since there has been a significant effort or moneys spent in the
area of crime prevention. The money would be spent to replace old and worn out
neighborhood watch signs, replenish crime prevention booklets and pamphlets, and
obtain promotional materials for all age groups. We would purchase signs and banners
to put up at different locations to promote crime prevention, drug abuse education and
traffic safety. Purchase a drug identification kit for display and education. Obtain
different displays of locking devices to show at neighborhood watch meetings.
Crime Prevention Analysis Program and Mapping System
This program and mapping system would allow us to separately track individual crime
statistics and display the information on maps. The computer can track specific times
and dates to identify crime trends.
Attachment B
Cameras, Fingerprint Equipment and Materials for Child Identification Kits
The Police Department would able to provide a program for parents to keep pictures
and identifying information at home for identifying their children in case of emergencies.
Surveillance Video Equipment
The Police Department does not have specific equipment for watching areas of the city
experiencing a series of thefts, drug activity or vandalism. The equipment would be
used to monitor these areas and give us a clear picture of what is happening. It could
also help identify the suspects.
Baseball Cards with Officers Pictures and Information
Many departments have used baseball style cards with officers pictures on them and a
profile of what the officers job is. It also has a safety tip on the back. The card have
been very popular with school aged children and we get stopped regularly by children
asking for them.
South Bay Youth Project
The South Bay Youth Project assists youths and parents through:
• Individual and family Counseling
• School Based Counseling
• Parent Education
• Positive Alternative Activities
Attachment B 2
a
4
Honorable Mayor, and Members of the
Hermosa Beach City Council
Subject:
Initiated by staff
Purpose: Adopt resolution certifying compliance with CMP pursuant to
California Government Code Section 65089
September 18, 1996
Regular Meeting
October 8, 1996
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP)
Recommendation: Adopt the attached resolution certifying compliance with
Congestion Management Program.
Background: In 1990 the electorate adopted Proposition 111. As a result every city
must provide annual documentation that it is in compliance with the State mandated
program which provides a link between development, transportation and air quality
through trip reduction and transportation measures to improve the state's economic
vitality and the quality of life.
Analysis: Using the mathematical formulas, provided by the Metropolitan
Transportation Authority, staff has prepared the Local Implementation Report (LIR)
which indicates that the City is in compliance with State requirements (see attached
report). The City had a total of 10,692 credits; after subtracting the debits as result of a
small amount of development in the year 95-96, a total of 10,531 remain. Thus, at this
time no transportation or traffic improvement measures will be necessary.
Michael chubach, Planning Director
CONCUR
Sol Blumenf d, P rector
Community P -v lopment
Stephen R. -T' i — anager
Attachments:
Proposed Resolution
Local Implementation Report
empiu
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA FINDING THE
CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
(CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089
Whereas, the City Council held a public hearing on October 8, 1996 to consider oral and written
testimony and made the following Findings:
The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), acting as the Congestion
Management Program Agency for Los Angeles County adopted the Congestion Management
Program in November 1995.
The adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the County and cities within the
County are conforming to all CMP requirements.
The adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP Local Implementation Report.
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE THE FOLLOWING:
SECTION 1. The City has taken all of the following actions, and the City is in conformance with
all applicable requirements of the 1995 CMP.
The City has taken annual traffic counts for 1996 and calculated levels of service for selected
arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and
Roadway System Chapter.
The City has adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance,
consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand
Management Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implemented a land use analysis program, consistent
with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program Chapter.
The City has adopted a Local Implementation Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof,
consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances traffic congestion
impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that
the City is meeting its responsibilities under the County Deficiency Plan.
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a
copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of October, 1996
President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
cmp96
City of Hermosa Report Period: June 1, 1995 - May 31, 1
1995 CMP Local Implementation Report Date Prepare 23 -Sep -96
Contact: Michael Schubach
Phone Number3180214
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
1995 DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS\ SUMMARY
1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal
[from Section (161)
2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims
[from Section 0
Subtotal Current Credit (G (161)
3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's (1994)
Local Implementation Repor
Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance:. .
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
10,692
10,531
PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category Dwelling Debit Subtotal
Units Value
Single Family Residential 18 x 6.80 = (122)
Multi -Family Residential 0 x 4.76 = 0
Group Quarters 0 x 1.98 = 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1000 Gross Debit Subtotal
Square Feet Value
Commercial (less than 300,000 0 x 22.23 = 0
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or 0 x 17.80 = 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 1 x 66.99 = (80)
NON -RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1000 Gross Debit Subtotal
Square Feet Value
Lodging 0 x 7.21 = 0
Industrial 0 x 6.08 = 0
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft 0 x 16.16 = 0
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0 x 10.50 = 0
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more 0 x 7.35 •= 0
Medical 0 x 16.90 = 0
Government 0 x 20.95 = 0
Institutional/Educational 0 x 7.68 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description Daily Debit Subtotal
(Attach additional sheets Trips Value
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0 x 0.71 = 0
ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0 x 0.71 = 0
Subtotal New Development Activity = (202)
Adjustments (Optional) - Complete Part 2 = 41
Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points) _
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
(161)
PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development pe
were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the rep
2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category Dwelling Adjustment Subtotal
Units Value
Single Family Residential 6 x 6.80 = 41
Multi -Family Residential 0 x 4.76 = 0
Group Quarters 0 x 1.98 = 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1000 GrosAdjustment Subtotal
Square FeValue
Commercial (less than 300,000 0 x 22.23 = 0
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or 0 x 17.80 = 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0 x 66.99 = 0
NON -RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category 1000 GrosAdjustment Subtotal
Square FeValue
Lodging 0 x 7.21 = 0
Industrial 0 x 6.08 = 0
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft 0 x 16.16 = 0
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.) 0 x 10.50 = 0
Office (300, 000 sq.ft. or more 0 x 7.35 = 0
Medical 0 x 16.90 = 0
Government 0 x 20.95 = 0
Institutional/Educational 0 x 7.68 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Description Daily Trilmpact Subtotal
(Attach add'l sheets if necessary) Value
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0 x 0.71 = 0
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0 x 0.71 = 0
Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) = 41
October 1, 1996
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of
October 8, 1996
Recommendation:
That the City Council consider request from Aviation Market and make the determination
of whether or not the issuance of off -sale beer and wine license is in the "public
convenience or necessity".
Background:
I have attached a letter from the owners of the new Aviation Market, Nasser and
Minoo T. Bakhtiari, requesting that the City Council determine that it is a matter of public
convenience or necessity that an off -sale beer and wine license be permitted for their store.
The store is a small retail outlet in the shopping center located on the northeast corner of
Aviation and Prospect. There are a number of other retail and restaurant uses in the
center. There is plenty of parking which is shared by all of the uses in the center. The
store is open now and sells convenience items, soft drinks and sandwiches. The posted
hours are 9:OOam to 6:OOpm. This is the only off -sale license in the center. The City code
does not require any discretionary permit for this type of use, including selling alcohol, as
long as they close before 11:OOpm, however, if the Conditional Use Permits standards
were applied, they would meet them. This request is before you so that they can continue
the process that they have started with the ABC to obtain a license. If the City Council
decides not to issue a letter to ABC determining that it is a matter of public convenience
or necessity, the process for the ABC license stops.
This is the second request that the City Council has considered under the new requirement
in the state law. The first request was from the Beach Market which was approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Stephen R. Burrell
City Manager
REQUEST FROM AVIATION MARKET FOR DETERMINATION OF
"PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY" FOR ABC OFF -SALE
BEER AND WINE LICENSE
ti
Recommendation:
That the City Council consider request from Aviation Market and make the determination
of whether or not the issuance of off -sale beer and wine license is in the "public
convenience or necessity".
Background:
I have attached a letter from the owners of the new Aviation Market, Nasser and
Minoo T. Bakhtiari, requesting that the City Council determine that it is a matter of public
convenience or necessity that an off -sale beer and wine license be permitted for their store.
The store is a small retail outlet in the shopping center located on the northeast corner of
Aviation and Prospect. There are a number of other retail and restaurant uses in the
center. There is plenty of parking which is shared by all of the uses in the center. The
store is open now and sells convenience items, soft drinks and sandwiches. The posted
hours are 9:OOam to 6:OOpm. This is the only off -sale license in the center. The City code
does not require any discretionary permit for this type of use, including selling alcohol, as
long as they close before 11:OOpm, however, if the Conditional Use Permits standards
were applied, they would meet them. This request is before you so that they can continue
the process that they have started with the ABC to obtain a license. If the City Council
decides not to issue a letter to ABC determining that it is a matter of public convenience
or necessity, the process for the ABC license stops.
This is the second request that the City Council has considered under the new requirement
in the state law. The first request was from the Beach Market which was approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Stephen R. Burrell
City Manager
Aviation Market
1139 Aviation Blvd.
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
(310) 372-7371
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Attn.: City Manager Steve Burrell
Dear Mr. Burrell:
RECEIVED
SEP 2 4 1996
CITY MGR. OFFICE
September 24, 1996
As you may be aware, Aviation market is applying to the Department of Alcohol Beverage
Control for on off -sale beer and wine license at the above referenced site.
Investigator Jo Ann Aguilar from the Inglewood ABC district office has informed us that recent
legislation, as of January 1, 1995, requires a letter from the city where premises are located to
establish the issue of public convenience and necessity, in order to obtain a state -issued beer and
wine license.
Because of this, the Department of ABC is forced to deny said application unless they receive
such a letter from the city of Hermosa Beach stating that the issuance of said license will be a
matter of public convenience and necessity.
The existence of beer and wine in a convenience store is a common and accepted practice. Our
customers will benefit from the issuance of this license by purchasing their beer and wine while
they shop for other items carried by our store. Such items include bread, milk, a full line of
groceries, over the counter drugs, etc. Thus the customer can avoid unnecessary and unwanted
extra trips to a liquor store or a busy supermarket.
We will be extremely grateful if your department can write such a letter to Investigator Jo Ann
Aguilar conveying to her your opinion regarding this matter of public convenience and necessity.
Should your department agree to send said letter, please address it as follows:
Investigator Jo Ann Aguilar
Department of Alcohol Beverage Control
P.O. Box 6500
Inglewood, CA 90306
Thank you in advance for your kind attention to this matter, and please call the undersigned with
any questions or problems regarding our request.
Sincerely Yours,
Nasser & Minoo T. Bakhtiari
Owners
/-Y
October 1, 1996
Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of
of the Hermosa Beach City Council
SUBJECT: Review of Temporary Sign Permit Process
PURPOSE: To review the requirements for temporary signs
October 8, 1996
Background:
At the September 24; 1996 City Council meeting, Council requested that staff provide an
overview of the temporary sign permit requirements.
Analysis:
Temporary Banner Sign Permits are issued for a 60 day period. The applicant submits a
sign permit application and fee of $33.00 and staff reviews the application for
conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance. The application is generally reviewed within
24 hours and is often issued over the counter. Unpermitted banner signs include anything
over 100 square feet or greater than 40% of the allowed permanent sign area or flags,
pennants streamers or signs constructed of wood. The applicant is required to install and
maintain the temporary sign pursuant to the sign permit.
Sign Code Enforcement
Most applicants conform to the requirements of the Ordinance. Sometimes business
owners do not comply with 60 day time limit for maintaining the banner or do not obtain a
permit. In these cases staff will verify the condition through field survey and issue a letter
to the business owner citing the relevant section of the Zoning Ordinance or Municipal
Code and request that the matter be corrected within 15 days. If the owner does not
comply then staff issues a second letter with the same timetable for correction. Most
business owners comply at this point, however, if a an owner refuses to cooperate after
the second notice a final letter is issued by the City Prosecutor requiring compliance. A
citation can then be issued by staff The first violation is $50, a second violation is $100
and a third violation is $150. The problem has never progressed to this stage as business
owners typically comply with the staff or City Prosecutor's letter and staff is reluctant to
involve the Police Department or Parking Enforcement in citing businesses.
Surveys of Banner Signs
Over the last two years staff has conducted field surveys every four months. Staff has then
proceeded with follow-up letters requesting compliance and has generally had good results
with compliance. Staff has observed that when there is not regular follow-up on banner
sign compliance then the number of non -conforming banner signs increase. The City
previously required a $250 deposit in the form of a check with each sign application. This
deposit was deemed to be too costly for the applicants. Requiring a deposit also requires
having the City take in and track the deposit which is time consuming for staff However
most cities use deposits as a method for enforcement of the sign ordinance.
9
t
It is difficult to keep up with the proliferation of banner signs and it is necessary to
conduct regular surveys and issue letters which consumes up to 20 hours of staff time per
month. Staff also tries to come up with alternative methods for dealing with signs
(permanent and temporary) such as providing design assistance for identification signs.
(See attached).
Council may want to consider eliminating regulation of banner signs as it is time
consuming, costly and not business friendly.
Recommendation:
That the City Council provide direction on banner signs relative to:
1. Maintaining the current policy and procedures
2. Increase the duration for displaying banner signs and thereby reduce the
frequency of inspection for code enforcement.
3. Require a deposit with each banner sign application to ensure the banners are
removed on time.
4. Eliminate the regulation of banner signs
Sol B umenfel s, Di ector
Community D velopment Department
CONCUR:
Step urrell,
City anager
Attachments:
1. Typical code enforcement letter
2. Example of staff concept plan for product identification sign
Z
J
July 24, 1996
«Company»
«Address 1»
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Subject: Notice Regarding Illegal Display of Temporary Sign(s) (SECOND NOTICE)
Dear Sir / Madam
During a recent follow-up inventory of all the City's commercial districts, it was noted
that -your business is continuing to display a temporary sign or signs without the benefit of
a permit. Please be advised that you must remove any illegal temporary signs and that you
must obtain a permit if you would like to keep or display one banner. We will follow up
with another inspection in seven (7) days to verify your compliance.
Please be reminded, pursuant to the letter I sent you a month ago and, as set forth in
Section 13.5-21 of the Zoning Ordinance, temporary signs are only permitted as follows:
Type Allowed: One banner sign per business
Duration: Sixty (60) days during the calendar year, in increments of not less
than thirty (30) days.
Size: 40% of allowed permanent signage, maximum 100 square feet.
Types Prohibited:
Anything other than a banner, including but not limited to
pennants, streamers, portable wood or paper signs, flags
(except the American Flag).
IfEXCEPTION: For Grand Openings, all types of temporary sings may be permitted,
or a maximum of 60 days from the date of the opening, permits required
Also, Pursuant to Section 13.5-21, an application for a temporary sign or grand
opening signs shall submitted for review and approval prior to installation.
For your convenience I have enclosed the form necessary to make application for a
temporary sign permit for one banner, which could be permitted up to a maximum 30
more days. Please return the completed application, along with the required fee
immediately.
Please be further advised that failure to comply with the sign ordinance is an infraction.
The first violation is punishable with a fine of $50.00. Each day of a violation is
considered a separate offense. Successive violations can result in greater fines.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact
Ken Robertson at (310) 318-0242 from 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday.
Respectfully,
saeR' jed
Sol Blumenfeld, Director
Community Development
Store Identification
6,_0„
Store
r-Sto17—t—mur
P
Landscaped Berm --F'40
e . 4
Concept Plan
Not for Construction
-u.•e 8) aqin).I %to
Commodity Identification
6" Typ.
6„ Typ.
N
6" Conc. Curb
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Driveway
9,-0„
Exist Sign
to be Removed
-t T-6" de
Typ.
liamm
Proposed
Monument Sign
Exist. Parking Lot to
be Restriped
Concept Plan
Not for Construction
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ac--?Lie-t., 6; -c)
4'm /h,
October 3, 1996
Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City Council Meeting
October 8, 1996
SCHEDULING APPLICANT INTERVIEWS FOR UNSCHEDULED
VACANCY OF UNEXPIRED TERM ON PARKS, RECREATION AND
COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council schedule a meeting prior to its regular scheduled meeting
of Tuesday, October 22, 1996, for the purpose of interviewing applicants for the unscheduled
vacancy on the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission to fill an
unexpired term ending June 30, 1997, with appointment to be made at the regular Council
meeting of October 22.
Background:
At its meeting of August 29, 1996, the City Council directed the City Clerk to advertise the
unexpired term with newspaper publication and normal posting procedures and invite applications
from interested parties to fill the unscheduled vacancy that arose on the above -noted Commission
due to the unfortunate passing away of Dani Peirce.
A notice inviting applications for the unscheduled vacancy was published in the Easy Reader
September 19 and September 26, with an 6 p.m. October 2 deadline for submitting applications.
That notice was also posted at City Hall, along with the special vacancy notices previously posted
in the City Clerk's office and the Library as required by State law. There were no current (filed
within the last year) applications on file, and the following three applications have been received:
Kathy Dunbabin
Silvestre "Sal" G. Gonzales Todd R. Kuh
Since the interviews and appointment will not take place until the next meeting date of October
22, the Mayor may, with Council concurrence, wish to announce an extension of the application
filing deadline to no later than 6 p.m. Wednesday, October 16. That deadline is necessary in order
to allow for the preparation of the required staff report and the inclusion of all applications in the
October 22 Council agenda packets, which will go out on Thursday, October 23.
Elaine Doerfling, City Jerk
Noted:
Stephen R. Burr- i y Manager
11 a
Name:
!" ori �_� Jf��ii
,. IM's' ��,
THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH :` `"`k
'. 1996 �H
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL Mgu ' Zf
fiftahassegsati .'
(',> �5,
NAME OF COMMISSION Vc3, c - -\‘'i �• � ' r04\
Home Phone: ��- 1o° fo
m
Address: 2A 32 (`(1�- ,
Occupation or Profession: Q corkerA���� CJ`
Bus. Phone:
Name of Employer:
Address of Employer:
REFERENCES:
Local:
Professional:
Other:
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present):
Why do you wish, to become a Commission Member?Sircc_ rv\\ 1. 01(c \13:S. W.S›
you ar the uties.and resporm
e cin \ cv\..
lities of a Commission member?
Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities which could be
construed as a conflict of interest? Yes ✓ No (If yes, please list)
Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past
activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a
Commission member.
•
1.11.
•
41.
y
lb
0
4111
1in IN.
- •....y--11.
S.
.•
...4
.•
a _ k
3 -mac
p
v� r6,k-t
This Commission meets on-\�N. �e0& at 1 p.m.
Do you foresee
any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes ' No
How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? VI
Comments:
Signed:
Date:
6/5/91
TEE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
APPLICATION FOR APPA IN".- *.= N';' TO MUNICIPAL COMMISSION
NAME OF CCMiISS:ON PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION
Name: SILVESTRE "SAL" G. GONZALES Home Phone:
374-7281
Address: 3201 TENNYSON PLACE, HERMOSA BEACH, CA, 90254
Occupation or Profession: REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER
Name of Employer: UDI DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
Bus. Phone: (213) 569-4563
Address of Employer: 9500 RAYO AVENUE, SOUTH GATE, CA, 90280
REFERENCES:
Local : JERRY AND LESLIE NEWTON, 2041 CIRCLE DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CA, 90254
Professional: BOB AND VIVA STROYKE, 3205 THE STRAND, HERMOSA BEACH, CA, 90254
Other: DOROTHEA MOSBY, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION, 4900 SOUTHERN AVE., SOUTH GATE, CA
COiOITNITy PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present) :
SOUTH GATE KIWANIS CLUB MEMBER
OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION FUNDRAISING COMMITTEE
90280
ll
c
SEp2a,9'9s L4•
MC• Fyet f,..../
t� M }Jsr.,, \
% •' /
Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? TO BECOME INVOLVED IN THE
COMMUNITY AND HAVE AN ACTIVE ROLE TO MAKE A POSITIVE DIFFERENCE.
What dc you feel are the duties and respcnsibilities of a Commission member?
TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE CITY COUNCIL IN REGARDS TO THE PARKS, THEIR PROGRAMS, AND
SERVICES. ALSO, TO DISCUSS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PERTAINING TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES. MOST IMPORTANTLY, TO BE A LIAISON BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY AND
THE CITY COUNCIL.
Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities which could be
construed as a conflict of interest? Yes XX No (If yes, please list)
Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past
activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a
Commission member.
B.S., BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - 1987
UNIVERSITY OF GUADALAJARA, SPANISH STUDIES - 1987
CONSTRUCTION FIELD SUPERVISION - CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION - 1990
GENERAL CONTRACTOR LICENSE #627427 - UDI DEVELOPMENT CO, INC. 1987 - PRESENT
CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE BROKER LICENSE #C0379242 - SG REALTY GROUP
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BUILDERS - MEMBER
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION - MEMBER, I.C.B.O. - MEMBER
RECIPIENT OF BEAUTIFICATION AWARD,- CITY OF SOUTH GATE
USC FOOTBALL TEAM ALUMNI / 1985 ROSE BOWL PARTICIPANT
KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY
This Commission meets on at p.m. Do you forest
any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes XX No
PER APPLICATION, THIRD WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT 7:00 P.M.
How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? ONE YEAR AS HOMEOWNER, SEVERAL AS TENANT
Comments:
I AM CONCERNED WITH THE GROWTH OF HERMOSA BEACH AS WELL AS OUR YOUTH, WHO WILL
BECOME THE FUTURE. THE PARKS AND RECREATION IN THE CITY ARE OF VITAL IMPORTANCE TO OUR
GROWTH AND OUR YOUTH.
Signed: NEM 67,147v.
SEPTEMR ER 23 /996
Date:
6/5/91
10/02'96 14!38
10/02/90 WED 11:22 FAX 310 372 6186
IT 310 670 1418 L. R. M. L. T. D. a 02
CITY OF IILRMOSA BEACH
TEE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMISSION
®0 0'
NAME OF
COMISSION me I- 477U4/ CW"IUN/T f�-SOU
AovSo Y (.W//./ON
97.
Name: TOpo i4. �UW Home Phones 3.JO
5(P
Address; /50Z LO/(f14 P,' /Ve # C!i //tfer eeAc (# P` 02 5
Occupation or Profession: LAWegLA'P6 A /1TV,
Name of Employer; 1-f7 LTO - Bus. Phone 0l0
Address of Employer: sea -7 of A4Np- vAlr LOG vE- 6/Ty C4 trozea
REFERENCES:
Local: AFjAIi/At/IV-1>C640/1--4°14116) 51 _?r077 "")""l5I6)
Professional: ToPfer GO/11TP #,4 •- 1 (3/a, 6&O -M8(0°4'4(30060-0.3/ I
Other:
Q+(/ V/G -C/'i ` - x`1/19 (4-6;•" 4Z 39 albr1 99) -en-Z4:;/ f5fro.
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present):
\k--
/ e e `
1998 s :4-
\`
4
%
why do you wish to become a Commission Member? //t/ 13P/5r Pap -40) MAT / I -bpi
EVEN A- PPf/p&. op /lEfm c ' 6 E4Aa// N> .p /L /4/ -T 1"0
&Ue6CA6r Ja.. Y dliN/ 1' W/V THE &doc: L 14~6 . / SeA/e. A SlPrWtt pcoedivil of ealri//w 7�
PfiiGe * /divot -r- .1 ivau p u -To mime/Afro /q 77 i' EFIrOPT Amo LEi io 10 Y
tft 1L �S yo Ti+n l.Oafa//'.<mA/ /N NO/ 7"o F//A.T4W- Wariore we (be z s/ 5P4
What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Comm&aision member?
7a A"4'I' T r' (I7 Y epoweic- / J 6 i/y b/ V& ANO /rr/ g.
OPIPATON/7/6i' Pe1L )7t5 GOIU*4Utin D /NVi GD
•
IS sill
PreecA la/V, gO(x 1-r'D1v,. e1/1 -771112-A1 -- kw) S6 G, , ea VI (e
10/02/96 14:39
1U/O2/90 WED It:23 F. 310 372 0180
310 670 1418 L. R. M. L. T. D. el 03
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities which could be
construed as a conflict of interest? Yes ✓ No (If yes, please list)
Zoos
Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past
activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you ELs a
Commission member.
4/0 A- 6P- u,4re OF C41-- Poi- Po foA/A- / frnoa/ r-
Ste/Doc Or eNV/ AO,VNIOUTi4L 4105/6,Vi iv/'r# 4- P1$— /4/
% i/O6c4g,- ,4p I /r '1/ .
Atio ', z rey /ver- ix 1 f-qz- s- %tR - / GAiIT LT!/#{ opyrA-
/4/ GUGver- ciry.
rfst 4-6‘,o +a- 0160002-- - op TNc A-str -- cAly '.SOC-/&ry'' of 1.-buOScdfiP6-
iirre.M .
7716 771/P0 0 61J60N624Y
This Commission meets on "P EV6f y /h'9 7't at pal, p.m. Co you foresee
any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes ✓ No
How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? t2 Me/WI/3
Comments:
/ Mfrs- - A- 4.09004, /R/rrlz-667 / / L -MAT / 17' `5ikial5
41/p PX ' rovcC 0 P V 0 T P > _ >_ ; - 77 V i/J)
le/k/#11//t/fry /' xU S A0V/oP7 4O'M l -04/0/U.
/ 4f ire// -re i'HE oirfoitruitory Alva / (-t k= for -a -s t' To 1 1'tJ4
mom Yrr,
signed:
Dat.:
f
/e/2/96
6/5/91
October 3, 1996
Honorable Mayor and Members of
the Hermosa Beach City Council
Regular Meeting of
October 8, 1996
REQUEST TO SCHEDULE SPECIAL MEETING FOR
DOWNTOWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FINAL REVIEW ITEMS
At the Special Meeting held on September 18, 1996, staff was directed to
return with colors and samples for the street furniture and light fixtures. The
design team has developed the information that was requested, as well as the
samples. It is proposed that a Special Meeting be set for Thursday,
October 17, 1996 at 7:00pm to review and make the final selections.
Recommendation:
Schedule Special Meeting for Thursday, October 17, 1996 at 7:00pm in the
Council Chambers.
Respectfully submitted,
Stephen ' . Burrell
City Manager
7
N
N
w
V
0
•N
to
N
z
GLA
WY.
a."
r
/
N13.37'52'W
I` \\ '- --
- *AK r';f,e_ovf
81.04 �L _
/ t Ac -c /t;G_1E
/-22,4A/7-./.74-z,
ACEA
7;,
/
N
\,..125-1\
/v
4,04 !A CI
�iY Ttti'! S rC/C, 7' c'E"� ri U,/: A 4. 7- 572C'!/.:' re./ATS-
//LC.
G.'/ca
// '. 7 !-
11'/ )7 r
,
ILs:
/(, g. /)
D
MONUMENT LEGEND
G A`;, /'E?: ///14:
,r
OS SET LEAD & TAG. R.C.E. 20327
O2 NOTHING FOUND OR SET. INACCESSIBLE
{I ”
V
v ! J�
(1,j1V
12'
\\
\\
N? \
\ \
//,'.`3—
/27-f-
4
-
A, f.
GeStNC
/
'//
iy N. •
S
�V\ \A
A /
C N.„.\\_i_7,...<_,.
., rid 1,
�,
4
ti
N13.38'28'W 99.92
c C/ Sr
,1/
Ic
/7/4: -21/2/y1/2. -I. ;
�\ l
'�Cr'1t;f 1/Fn = 1'-�t1
V
(r%, LJ e c
U p±;
Tom. V._'.T -
'Jr
tt.!;‘,.
1'
yr 7/711
IrTic/ ISI ✓
PE 0/
_jJ
WI -7
' F�l-'o y
No.20327
OF CAD��`
JUL 6 1935
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 9 AND 10 AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 8 AND 11 OF TRACT NO.
2143, IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 25, PAGE
20, OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY , AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 12 , 1994
AS INSTRUMENT NO. 94-2197096 , OFFICIAL RECORDS , RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY.
TOPOGRAPHIC NOTES
1. CONTOUR LINES SHOWN ON THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WERE
GENERATED FROM RANDOM SPOT ELEVATIONS. THE EXPECTED
LEVEL OF ACURRACY IS ± 1/2 OF THE CONTOUR INTERVAL.
ISOLATED ELEVATIONS , AS PLACED ON THE PLAT WERE PHYS-
ICALLY MEASURED AT APPROXIMATELY THE LOCATIONS SHOWN.
THEIR EXPECTED LEVEL OF ACCURACY IS ± 0.10 FOOT.
2. IF SPECIFIC ELEVATIONS ARE REQUIRED , THE USER SHOULD
CONTACT PIAI ENGINEERING , INC., TEL: (310) 379-4941
FOR SAME. INTERPOLATIONS MADE FROM THIS TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY SHOULD BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD
ENGINEERING PRACTICE, AND LIABILTY FOR INTERPRETATION
IS NOT ASSUMED BY THE PREPARER, PIAI ENGINEERING, INC.
SURVEY CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA , THAT THIS PLAT CONSISTING OF
c 1rr SHEET(S) CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE UNDER
MY SUPERVISION IN G/274,5, //it/S. THAT ALL
MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS
ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT INCLUDE EASE-
MENTS EXCEPT CIFICALLY DELINEATED HEREON.
!
VICTOR W PIAT; R.C.E. 20327 DATE
PURPOSE:
LOT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
JOB NO. 10662
DRAWN BY: VJP
DATE: 6-95
CLIENT: HAKAN & ANNA WIBERG. 1630 WOLACOTT, REDONDO BEACH, CA.
JOB SITE: 807 21ST STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CA.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DEED RECORDED 12/12/94 AS INSTR. 194-2197096
PIAI ENGINEERING, INC.
220 S. PACIFIC COAST HWY., 1103, REDONDO BEACH; CA. 90277
(310) 379-4941
CIVIL ENGINEERS