Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05/12/98
REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 12, 1998 - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session CALL TO ORDER: 7:13pm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Merna Marshall ROLL CALL: OAKES, BOWLER, REVICZKY ABSENT: EDGERTON, BENZ MAYOR'S COMMENTS / ANNOUNCEMENTS: NONE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Rosamond Fogg: Provided copies of press release regarding a community meeting being held by Stop Oil. Con Flatley: Questioned Mayor's removal of FFFFishack item from the agenda. Steven Kenny: Spoke regarding delay in hearing FFFFishack issue. Gary Vincent: Spoke regarding delay in hearing FFFFishack issue. (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS 1 164 : "r4 11. :aitt (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Roger Bacon dated April 7, 1998 regarding permits for fundraising activities in Greenwood Park. (Continued from meeting of April 28, 1998) 2. Letter from Laura Somers of the Redondo Union High School '98 Grad Night Committee requesting a donation for the event. 3. Letter from Rosamond Fogg dated April 28, 1998 regarding a request for AQMD study of carcinogenic risk relating to the oil project. CITY MANAGER NOTEDTHAT STAFF IS AWAITING A RESPONSE FROM AOMD ON THIS ISSUE. 4. Letter from Administrative Services Co-op dated May 1, 1998 requesting discussion of the licensing of taxicabs under the new city code. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on April 28, 1998. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March 1998 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. 2 • • (e) Recommendation to appropriate $850 donation from Betty Benoit Memorial Fund to the Public Works Administration/Parks Department to be used for the purchase of a park bench and plaque. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated May 6, 1998. PULLED BY JR TO RECOGNIZE DONATION (f) Recommendation to authorize Mayor to sign an agreement with Harris & Associates, Inc. for contract administration and inspection services for the north Pier Parking Structure in the amount of $275,570. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. (g) Recommendation to break the Municipal Pier Renovation Project into two projects; the Municipal Pier Structural Retrofit and the Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrades, approve an amendment to the Pier Renovation design contract with Harding, Lawson & Associates to break the project into two phases and add $4,510 to the contract to cover these changes; and, allocate $2,550 in County Prop A Open Space Funds to the Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrades Project to cover the costs for architectural renderings. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. (h) Recommendation to award construction management contract for the Municipal Pier Renovation to Concept Marine in the amount of $187,620; prescribe that the Director of Public Works reject all other proposals; and, authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within 10% of the contract cost. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. (i) a) Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding with the County of Los Angeles Public Works Department for the educational site visit reimbursement program. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 7, 1998. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving the engineer's report for Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-99 made pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 98-5907; and, adopt resolution declaring the City Council intention to order certain improvements and to levy and collect assessment within the District for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1998 through June 30, 1999 and setting June 9, 1998 to accept public input on the matter of the proposed assessment. Memorandum from'Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 4, 1998. (k) •ra rP C. • Recommendation to appropriate $30,000 in Park and Recreation Tax Funds(1251 to cover costs for rehabilitation of tennis and basketball court surfaces located at the Community Center and Clark Field. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. (1) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map # 24696 for 3 - unit condominium proiect at 1550 Monterey Boulevard. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 30, 1998. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. NONE MUNICIPAL MATTERS 4. MOBILEHOME PARK REGULATIONS - MARINELAND MOBILEHOME PARK. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 7, 1998. 4 5. 6'H STREET TRAFFIC STUDY - PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TO ARDMORE AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 6, 1998. 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT FOR PREFERENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM AND LETTERS FROM RESIDENTS REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE PREFERENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 7, 1998. 7. REVISED PROPOSAL FOR A BEACH CONCERT ON SEPTEMBER 19, 1998. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 6, 1998. E€REV SEW PROPOS. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. VEHICLE LICENSE FEES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 5, 1998. b. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) LICENSE AGREEMENT - PATRICK MALLOY'S RESTAURANT. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 6, 1998. 5 • • 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL a. Request from Mayor Pro Tem Benz to consider holding a recognition dinner for the top 20 sales tax producers in the Hermosa Beach. CITIZEN COMMENTS NONE ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on April 14, 1998 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Stern v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YCO28739 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION: 10:39PM RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION: 11:20PM ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS: NONE ADJOURNMENT: 11:20PM 6 )_,,,eii-etz-tof /1s. "fig can't we build orphanages next to homes for the aged? Dl someone's sitting in a rocker, it won't be long before a kid will be in his lap." - Cloris ,Ceachman AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 12, 1998 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK Sam Y. Edgerton Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Robert Benz John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER John Bowler Stephen R. Burrell Julie Oakes CITY ATTORNEY J. R. Reviczky Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MAYOR'S COMMENTS / ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. 1 (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Members of the public wishing to request the removal of an item from the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; 3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 4) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from Roger Bacon dated April 7, 1998 regarding permits for fundraising activities in Greenwood Park. (Continued from meeting of April 28, 1998) RECOMMENDATION: Consider request and direct staff as deemed appropriate. 2. Letter from Laura Somers of the Redondo Union High School '98 Grad Night Committee requesting a donation for the event. RECOMMENDATION: Consider request and direct staff as deemed appropriate. 3. Letter from Rosamond Fogg dated April 28, 1998 regarding a request for AQMD study of carcinogenic risk relating to the oil project. RECOMMENDATION: Consider request and direct staff as deemed appropriate. 4. Letter from Administrative Services Co-op dated May 1, 1998 requesting discussion of the licensing of taxicabs under the new city code. RECOMMENDATION: Consider request and direct staff as deemed appropriate. • • 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on April 28, 1998. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March 1998 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to appropriate $850 donation from Betty Benoit Memorial Fund to the Public Works Administration/Parks Department to be used for the purchase of a park bench and plaque. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated May 6, 1998. (f) Recommendation to authorize Mayor to sign an agreement with Harris & Associates, Inc. for contract administration and inspection services for the north Pier Parking Structure in the amount of $275,570. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. (g) Recommendation to break the Municipal Pier Renovation Project into two projects; the Municipal Pier Structural Retrofit and the Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrades, approve an amendment to the Pier Renovation design contract with Harding, Lawson & Associates to break the project into two phases and add $4,510 to the contract to cover these changes; and, allocate $2,550 in County Prop A Open Space Funds to the Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrades Proiect to cover the costs for architectural renderings. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. (h) Recommendation to award construction management contract for the Municipal Pier Renovation to Concept Marine in the amount of $187,620; prescribe that the Director of Public Works refect all other proposals; and, authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within 10% of the contract cost. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. 3 (i) (i) • • Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding with the County of Los Angeles Public Works Department for the educational site'visit reimbursement program. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 7, 1998. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving the engineer's report for Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-99 made pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 98-5907; and, adopt resolution declaring the City Council intention to order certain improvements and to levy and collect assessment within the District for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1998 through June 30, 1999 and setting June 9, 1998 to accept public input on the matter of the proposed assessment. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 4, 1998. (k) Recommendation to appropriate $30,000 in Park and Recreation Tax Funds(125) to cover costs for rehabilitation of tennis and basketball court surfaces located at the Community Center and Clark Field. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. (1) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Man # 24696 for 3 - unit condominium project at 1550 Monterey Boulevard. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 30, 1998. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. NONE MUNICIPAL MATTERS 4. MOBILEHOME PARK REGULATIONS - MARINELAND MOBILEHOME PARK. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 7, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Review information provided by City Attorney and provide direction to staff on how to proceed. 4 • • 5. 6TH STREET TRAFFIC STUDY - PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TO ARDMORE AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 6, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT FOR PREFERENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM AND LETTERS FROM RESIDENTS REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE PREFERENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 7, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive the Notice of Intent to Issue an Amendment to Permit and direct City Manager to execute and return to Coastal Commission; and, 2) Provide direction to staff on how to implement the program. 7. REVISED PROPOSAL FOR A BEACH CONCERT ON SEPTEMBER 19. 1998. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 6, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Review the proposal and determine whether or not you wish to change the approval granted at the April 28, 1998 meeting. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. VEHICLE L'` ICENSE FEES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 5, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council take a position of opposing repeal of the Vehicle License Fee program. b. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) LICENSE AGREEMENT - PATRICK MALLOY'S RESTAURANT. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 6, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file letter from the ABC District Office without taking any action. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 5 • • 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Mayor Pro Tem Benz to consider holding a recognition dinner for the top 20 sales tax producers in the Hermosa Beach. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the CounciVs jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Reading of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on April 14, 1998 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Stern v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YCO28739 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 6 1`/_1 1L1; Sl; L l' -1111\L; CFN'1'1 1_` April 7, 1998 Steve Burrell, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Dry. Hermosa Bch. Ca. 90254 • Re: Greenwood Park permits for fund raising activities. Dear Steve: FILE RECEIVED APP - >; 1998 MANAGER'S 'S OFFICE Regarding our phone conversation yesterday. wherein I suggested under Park Section 12.28.110 allowing individuals to use Green- wood Park, with permits for fund raising activities. I would like to be heard on the above matter, in front of the City Council on Tuesday April 28, 1998 under written communications. I feel that it would be much wiser to transfer the above usage to the Hermosa Beach Community Center lawn. Parking at the Comm- unity Center offers many more oportunities for people to park and have toilet facilities available, and exposure to all the wonderful programs at the Community Center. The visibility, sinage and a large grass area, such as the area used by the Kiwanis Club for their annual Christmas tree sale, which has been very successful and to my knowledge, has worked safely. Of course, the 23 parking stalls on the north side of Greenwood Park with 2 hour limitations, would remain in effect, but again congestion would be relieved of trucks and vans from the Park fund activities people. Also, frankly speaking, the Ralphs Shopping Center would not be over -loaded with people connected with the fund raising activities. In the past, this has been a complaint from Ralphs Grocery Co. and other tenants in the Ralphs Shopping Center. Sincerely, Ralph's • Starbuck's • Bank of America (Kiosk) • Union Bank • McDonald's First Federal Bank • El Polio Inka • Allstate • Fox Photo 1100 Pacific Coast Highway • Hermosa Beach • California 90254 • (310) 374-8991 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 282 • Redondo Beach • California 90277 01 12.28.060 • 12.28.060 Permits required for use by commercial groups. Permits shall be required for any commercial group requesting use of any outdoor area or public facility within the city. Such permits shall be subject to contract negotiations with the city with a set minimum permit fee of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500.00) per day plus all costs incurred - by the city on behalf of the event. (Prior code § 22- 5) 12.28.070 Nonprofit organizations --Permit required. Permits shall be required for any nonprofit group requesting use of any outdoor area or public facility within the city. Such permits shall be subject to a per participant/spectator fee established by resolution of the city council plus all costs incurred by the city on behalf of the event. Any event numbering in excess of one thousand five hundred (1,500) combined participants and spectators shall be subject to contract negotiations with the city and fee adjustments. (Prior code § 22-5.1) • 12.28.080 Nonprofit organizations--Pass- throughs--Permit required. Permits shall be required for any nonprofit group requesting use of any outdoor area or facility for a pass-through event within the city. Such events shall be subject to a permit processing fee established by resolution of the city council plus all costs incurred by the city on behalf of the event. (Prior code § 22- 5.2) 12.28.090 Block party permits. Requests for permits for use of public rights-of- way for block parties may be made only by Hermosa Beach residents to the director of public safety. All permit requests shall be subject to review and approval by the department director or designee. Such permits are subject to a permit processing fee established by resolution of the city council. (Prior code § 22-5.3) • 12.28.100 Park reservations. Park reservations shall be available year round to accommodate Hermosa Beach residents for informal or neighborhood gatherings. Reservations are optional and there shall be no charge except when the city incurs direct costs on behalf of the event. Reservations can be made for the following parks only: Valley Park: Corner of Gould and Valley Dr. Bicentennial Park: 4th and Ardmore Greenwood Park: PCH and Aviation South Park 425 Valley Drive (Ord. 96-1155 § 24, 1996; prior code § 22-5.4) 12.28.110 Park permits for fundraising activities. A permit shall be required for any Hermosa Beach based nonprofit organization requesting use of a park for fundraising activities. Only Greenwood Park shall be available for this type of use. The above -referenced organizations shall be permitted to reserve the park for this type of activity up to four times per fiscal year. Such permits shall be subject to a permit processing fee established by resolution of the city council plus any direct costs incurred by the city on behalf of the event. (Prior code § 22-5.5) 12.28.120 Beach permits. No permits are required for use of beach volleyball courts except for the courts located at the pier. These courts are reserved by the city for special events. (Prior code § 2-5.6) 12.28.130 Commercial filming permits. As determined by the California Legislature in Califomia Government Code Section 14998.1, motion picture production is an important industry to the economy of California and local governments in this state should accordingly provide an environment conducive to the undertakings of the motion picture industry. To that end, the city expresses its desire and intention to create and maintain an environment in the city conducive to (12.28) 4 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION C 1 Redondo Union fitgh School '98 Grad Night Committee Co -Chairmen: Steve Bopp 372-3820 Fund -Raising: Laura Sommers 370-1995 Julie Bassine 371-2145 Faculty Advisor: Shannon Rodriguez 798-8665, x2043 Mayor Sam Edgerton and Hermosa Beach City Council Members 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, CA. 90254 April 28, 1998 RECEIVED APR 3 0 1998 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Dear Mayor Edgerton and City Council Members, Please include my April 28, 1998, communication (copy enclosed) as well as this addendum to that letter in the agenda for the May 12, 1998, Hermosa Beach City Council meeting. Since Hermosa Beach does not have a high school, its students have the choice of attending either Mira Costa High School or Redondo Union High School. Currently there are 11 students, who are Hermosa Beach residents, in the RUHS senior class of 320 students. The city of Redondo Beach has annually supported our Grad Nights both financially and with security while we are on campus. A donation from the city of Hermosa Beach would be greatly appreciated. Please considering supporting this worthwhile event which will provide the Hermosa Beach seniors with a safe and fun Grad Night 1998. Sincerely, Laura Somers Fundraising/Donations Chair 2206 Dufour Ave. Redondo Beach, CA. 90278 (310) 370-1995 Redondo Union I!ig h School '98 Grad Night Committee Co -Chairmen: Steve Bopp 372-3820 Julie Bassine 371-2145 Fund -Raising: Faculty Advisor: Laura Sommers 370-1995 Shannon Rodriguez 798-8665, x2043 Dear Merchants and RUHS Supporters: April 28, 1998 The Redondo Union High School Class of 1998 will be celebrating their June 18, 1998 Grad Night by going on an all-night event. Our theme this year is Club Tropicana and the location will be kept a secret until their arrival. Students will be transported from RUNS around 10:00 PM and will return to campus near dawn. The Grad Night Committee consists of a group of concerned parents who are organizing an event that will be memorable and fun, yet safe and free of drugs and alcohol. To sponsor this safe and sober event for the graduates, we need financial support from our local merchants and friends. The Grad Night Committee is a non- profit organization, so all contributions are tax deductible. Businesses and community support can greatly enhance our goal of a successful event attended by every senior. You can help us lower the ticket price by donating any amount possible to the RUHS/PTSA Grad Night '98 fund. If you are unable to donate money, please consider a store product or gift certificate donation which will be used for raffle prizes throughout the night. Please join us in supporting the effort with a donation. All contributions will be gratefully appreciated and acknowledged in the Grad Night Program. Please make your check payable to: RUHS/PTSA GRAD NIGHT and either mail to me or call for pick-up. If you have any questions, please call me or any of the volunteers listed above. Thank you for your time and consideration on behalf of all the seniors in the R U HS Class of 1998. Sincerely, Laura Somers Fundraising/Donations Chair 2206 Dufour Ave. Redondo Beach, CA. 90278 (310) 370-1995 APR -28-98 10:15 AM DT: TO: FR: RE: YES Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition • P.02 oN E 610 Sixth St. o Hermosa Beach CA o 90254 o 310-379-5698 Fax: 310-376-1298 April 28, 1998 Hermosa Beach City Council Stephen Burrell, Ilermosa Beach City Manager Michael Jenkins, Hermosa Beach City Attorney Rosamond Fogg, for Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Request for AQMD Study of Carcinogenic Risk - FOR COUNCIL AGENDA Stop OiI recently requested copies of all documents and engineering studies relating to the Macpherson OiI project. We were surprised to find that the city failed to request an assessment of carcinogenic risk and are writing to request that the city immediately ask for such a study to be undertaken. The Macpherson project is sited in close proximity to residences and regional recreational resources. Allowing a full-scale heavy industrial operation that uses or produces toxic chemical byproducts known to cause cancer and birth defects in a recreational and residential setting without having first evaluated the carcinogenic risk seems negligent. Therefore, the council is urged to request from the AQMD a study that would assess the project's Iiklihood of causing cancer in a percentage of people exposed to the project's effects. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. ID#8919)40 05/12/98 TUE 16:07 FAX 310 4058 OIL COMPANY 2716 OCEAN PARK 9OULEVARO_ SUITE 3080 SANTA MONICA. CALIFORNIA 90405 TEL 310 452 80 ,FAX. 310,452 0058 la r,acsunIle • May 12, 1998 Mr. Steve Burrell, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Macpherson Oil co • fa 002 Re: Rosamond Fogg's Corlrespondence dated April 28 1998 Dear Steve: We received a copy of a letter addressed to the Hermosa Beach City Council, City Manager and City Attorney from Rosamond Fogg dated April 28, 1998, concerning an assessment of carcinogenic risk. We understand that this letter will be submitted to the City Council at tonight's council meeting. In Ms. Fogg's letter, she states the following "We were surprised to find that the city failed to request an assessment of carcinogenic risk and we are writing to request that the city immediately ask for such a study to be undertaken." Martha Brock, a registered environmental assessor in the State of California, prepared an assessment of carcinogenic risk. On July 13, 1993, at the City Council hearing for the Conditional Use Permit, Martha Brock submitted her study and testified concerning the carcinogenic risk of the Hermosa Beach Oil Drilling Program. A copy of the transcripts containing her testimony to the City Council hearing is enclosed. Please be advised that Ms. Brock is updating her study and will be submitting it to the City in the near future. We request that you provide a copy of Ms. Brock's study and transcripts of the hearing to Aspen Environmental Group and Mr. Bercha for their use with the integrated risk assessment that the City Council requested them to perform. Very truly yours, )1/0 -e -fix, Donald R. Macpherson, Jr President DRMjrjr Enclosure CC: Martha Brock David Gautschy SUPPLEMENTAL C 3 INFORMATION 05/12/98 TUE 16:08 FAX 310 452 0058 Macpherson Oil co MAY 12 '98 10!43RM BRIG. BROWN 819243225 v` , •. • TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS HERMOSA BEACH CITY COILUNCMEET"112 duly 13, 1993 OMTED tlY: CYNTHIA REYNOLDS EYSTER CSR NO. 3210 MA FILE NO: 6-64: "":■KZ ■ ■ �eciateS ■ KASMAR. ZANGLIS $ ASSOCIATES CERTIFIED SNG+RTNAND AEP'ORTVIE 1110 s=NORA *W P.IUH C3LE'.1OA1C9 CENTRE. JUIT= 102 GLENDALE. CALIFO7V11* 91201 (819) 966-1241 AR2124 QA 3 05/12/98 TUE 16:08 FAX 310.4 058 Macpherson 011 co 411004MRY 12 '98 10:44RM BRIGH BROWN 0182433225 P.3/21 1 MR. EDGERTON: From who? You got to speak up. I 2 can't hear you. 3 DAVID GAUTSCHY; The EIR -- you had your own 4 consultant that was hired to prepare the EIR. Macpherson Oil. Company only paid for that consultant. 6 MAYOR WIEMANS: Would the gentleman from the Division 7 of Oil and Gas have expertise to answer this particular 8 question? 9 DAVID GAU TSCHY _ I don't know. 10 MAYOR WIEMANS: Would you come -- 11 DAVID GAVTSCHY: One more thing maybe I might mention 12 is we do have a consultant here, Omnibus Environmental 13 Services, and they have done some analysis for Macpherson 14 and maybe they would be able to speak to that better than I 15 would. Her name is Martha Brock, if you would like to ask 16 her any questions. 17 MAYOR WIEMANS: Fine_ Yes. Could she join us up 18 here, please? 19 RICHARD BAKER: 1 would recommend the Department of 20 Health Services would be more qualified to talk to you about 21 the carcinogens in oil products. 22 MAYOR WIEMANS: Thank you. Yes, ma'am. 23 MARTHA BROCK: Good evening. My name is Martha 24 Brock. I'm with Omnibus Environmental Services, and 25 Macpherson Energy recently retained us to conduct some RASMA,R, ZANGLIS 6e ASSOCIATES AR222S OU361? 104 05/12/98 TUE 16:08 FAX 310 452 0058 Macpherson 011 co MAY 12 '98 10:44AM BRIGH1110 BROWN 8182433225 • P.4121 I ops 1 evaluations regarding toxic and carcinogenic pollutants 2 which could occur from the oil operation. 3 Now, I have done some evaluations regarding the 4 toxic and carcinogenic effects from the oil operations based 5 on the proposed project design, including the 3o wells. And 6 I'm also available to answer any questions. Would you like 7 me to do a brief -- 8 MAYOR WIEMANS: Yes. My first question would be 9 could you state your qualifications, please? 10 MARTHA BROCK: Certainly. I am an attorney. I have 11 a Bachelor of Science in zoology with a specialty in 12 physiology_ I'm a registered environmental assessor in the 13 State of California through the Cal EPA. I have been doing 14 environmental evaluations and analysis and I specialize in 15 doing environmental evaluations for heavy industry and ha"e 16 been doing so since the mid-1970s. 17 MAYOR WIEMANS: Thank you. 18 MARTHA BROCK: I also have a firm of engineers and 19 other scientists, including industrial hygiena. 20 MR. EDGERTON: Can you give an opinion on the 21 question that was just posed? 22 MARTHA BROCK; There are -- 23 MR. RDGBRTON: You may have clicked it off. Try the 24 button on the bottom. 25 MARTHA BROCK: There are constituents in crude oil. 003613 105 KASMAR, ZANGX•IS 64 ASSOCIATES 05/12/98 1 TUE 16:08 FA% 310 4 058 Macpherson 011 co =4.47G'4`1�1GG-> • P. 5/21 x006 1 primarily benzene, which is considered to be a carcinogen. 2 Additionally, the projectro osa P p s to utilize two 2.4 1 3 million BTU per hour heater treaters. 4 They are units used to demulsify the oil, very 5 similar in design to a water r heater at the home, which also 6 emits benzene emissions which are carcinogenic, as well as a 7 list of other carcinogenic emissions which are formed as a 8 result of the combustionroc p ess of natural gas. 9 MR. EDOERTON: Any idea on how much is going out 10 there in the natural scheme of things? 1 mean, a lot of 11 things cause cancer and some of it is just unfortunately a 1 12 way of life. But is any of this stuff in such volume that 13 it really poses a risk/ 14 Again, I'm not saying that you are the perfect 15 person to give an opinion on this, but you're all we have 16 for tonight as far as I can see_ So I'm trying to exhaust 17 your knowledge on the subject. 1 18 MARTHA BROCK; I understand. That's right. 19 What we did in order to review the air emission 20 from a toxic and carcinogenic viewpoint was to take che 21 South Coast Air Quality Management District toxic screening 22 procedures. which is a conservative modeling estimation of 23 what kind of carcinogens might be emitted and at what levels 1 24 and then the impact to the surrounding community based at 1 25 the fence line as well as to the nearest industrial and AR2230 KASMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES 003614 106 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 05/12/98 TUE 16:09 FAX 310 452 0058 Macpherson 011 co MRY 12 '98 10:44RM BRIGHIOGROWN 8182433225111 1 residential receptors, P. 5/21 421007 2 Now, these guidelines were developed by the 3 South Coast Air Quality Management District in conjunction 4 with the California Air Resources Board and the Cal EPA's 5 Department of Toxic Substances Control. 6 What this evaluation does is it looks at the 7 emissions being emitted both from the tanks which will hold 8 the crude oil as well as the heater treaters which will 9 combust natural gas_ It then determines what the dispersion 10 factor might be, which is based on a pessimistic modeling, 11 and then applies what's called a unit risk factor which 12 estimates the potency of the various types of carcinogens 13 that may be emitted, and then comes up with what's called a 14 maximum individual cancer risk. 15 And the South Coast AQMD requires this 16 evaluation as part of their permitting process for new 17 projects or modified projects which have the ability to 18 increase carcinogenic pollutants, 19 What the AQMD requires in addition to the 20 performance of this calculation and screening evaluation is 21 that you pass a toxic threshold test. The South Coast AQMD 22 has determined in association with the Department of Toxic 23 Substance Control and other agencies that risk levels of the 24 maximum individual cancer rate less than one in one million 25 is such that it does not pose a significant concern, and A12231 00361)107 XASMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES r r i e r r tl r r n w ■ N r 05/12/98 TUE 16:09 FAX 310 4 058 Macpherson 011 co MAY 12 '98 10:44AM BRIGHT BROWN 8182433225 • P.7/21 Z008 1 that is a very, very conservative figure. 2 For new facilities constructed with what's 3 called toxic specs available controlled technology, which is 4 so new that it has not yet been defined, the risk may 5 increase up to ten in, one million. 6 Now, what I did was I went through and took the 7 proposed project's parameters, assuming 24 -hour -a -day, 365 8 day per year operation at the maximum 30 well production 9 level and ran through the South Coast AQMD toxic screening 10 analysis. And .hat we concluded based on the numbers -- 11 before I say what the results are, I should also indicate 12 what I used as an assumption. 13 In addition to the 99 percent vapor recovery, 14 which is a very doable control efficiency, what we did was 15 we looked at the crude oil, the benzene composition of crude 16 oil in various oil fields in the Southern California area. 17 We found that the benzene based on laboratory analyses of 18 crude oil in Southern California ranged approximately from 19 .01 percent by weight to approximately .1 percent by weight_ 20 Now, just to put those numbers in perspective, 21 gasoline, unleaded gasoline, at your pump would have 22 approximately 3 to 5 percent benzene, depending on which 23 refinery it came out. 24 MR. EDGERTON: I'm sorry. In the air? A122232 25 MARTHA BROCK: Pardon me? KASMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES UU361G 108 1 i 1 c 1 i 1 1 1 1 i i 1 05/12/98 TUE 16:09 FAX 310 452 0058 Macpherson Oil co MRY 12 '98 10:45RM BRIG BROWN 8182433225 • P.8/21 1 MAYOR WIEMANS: At the gas station. 2 MR. EDGERTON: Are you talking about in the air? In 3 the gasoline? 4 THE WITNESS: In the gasoline itself. 5 MR. EDGERTON: I guess I'm confused_ I don't 6 understand any of this stuff really. 7 ' Is it caused by vapors corning up or is it 8 coming into contact with the soluble? 9 MARTHA BROCK: No. It's considered -- crude oil is Z op9 10 considered to be an organic substance which is volatile. 11 It's not as volatile as some of the solvents that are 12 commonly used, such as acetones and xylenes and toluenes and 13 universal thinners and that kind of thing. However, it does 14 evaporate. This study assumes chat all of the benzene 15 content within the crude oil, in fact, evaporates into the 16 atmosphere. 17 MR_ EDGERTON: So then the risk factors as you stated 18 them, they would be caused by -- would the evaporation be 19 gaseous that would be coming in contact with a human being? 20 MARTHA BROCK: Well. it would rise. Yes. It is 21 lighter than air so it would definitely rise. It would be 22 ,as though if you took paint thinner and used it, poured it 23 out into your paint. you can smell the fumes coming off. 24 MR. EDGERTON: right. 25 MARTHA BROCK: That's what we're talking about. A 2.233 00361i 109 KASMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES 05/12/98 TUE 16:09 FAX 310 4 058 Macpherson Oil co • MAY 12 '98 10:45AM BRIGHT 818243225 P.9/21 1 Evaporation. 2 MR. EDGERTON: So then what are you saying as far as 3 your gas station analogy? You're saying that percent is higher? 5 THE WITNESS: Yes. 6 MR. EDGERTON: And so everybody standing around their 7 gas pumps then when you're pumping self -serve, you're e standing in a zone that has evaporating benzene? 9 MARTHA BROCK: That's a possibility, depending on how 10 good the vapor recovery control is and how good you are 11 about not topping off and how you remove the hood. There 12 are instances -- if you go to a really poorly run gas 13 station, for example, and you put on a benzene badge, which 14 is a personal monitor, it can react. 15 MR. EDGERTON: So I guess that answers the question 16 why no one pumps your gas anymore except you. I could never 17 figure that one out. 18 MARTHA BROCK: I'm sorry. I don't understand. 19 MR. EDGERTON: Go on. It's fascinating stuff. It 20 really is. 21 MARTHA BROCK: At any rate, we selected a crude oil 22 from the Wilmington oil field, several samples, which showed 23 that the crude oil in that area has approximately -7 24 percent -- excuse me -- ,07 percent benzene in the crude AR2234 25 oil. 003613 KASMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES 110 C_j 010 05/12/98 TUE 16:10 FAX 310 452 0058 Macpherson Oil co 410 P.10/21 1 We used those numbers and ran them through the 2 South Coast AQMD's screening procedures, and we found, using 3 the benchmark of one in one million as the level of no 4 concern established by the South Coast AQMD and the other 5 agencies, we found at the fence line the level -- the toxic 6 exposure to be three in one hundred million, which is three 7 orders of magnitude less. 8 Now, please understand_ When I said that this 9 study is conservative, what it assumes on a maximum 10 individual cancer risk case is that there will be a person 11 sitting at the receptor location -- in this case we took the 12 fence line -- and that person would sit there for 24 hours a 13 day, 365 days a year, for 70 years, 14 So the reason I tel], you that is that based on 15 the information from the proposed project, which is not 16 biased -- all we did is put the maximum through, took tank 17 sizes and so forth, ran them through this -- this screening 18 procedure tends to overestimate rather than underestimate 19 any potential risk. 20 MR. EDGERTON: I guess the bottom line -- maybe I'm 21 putting you on the spot here, but I got to do it anyway. 22 How do you respond to a letter written by a medical doctor 23 saying that this activity might be harmful to pregnant women 24 and might, in fact, cause birth defects? 25 MARTHA BRoCX: well, 1 think that it's veru difficult AR UUdI i.. !2235 111 KASMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES 0011 05/12/98 TUE 16:10 FAX 310 41,058 Macpherson 011 co • '- 1 O10G"J.iLLJ P.11/21 1 to respond to anecdotal information. I think that if you 2 have a study or you have bases, it's a lot easier to give 3' some sort of an answer. f_j o 12 4 I will say that it's definitely correct what 5 the doctor says, that hydrocarbon -based or oil-based 6 solvents and so forth, there is a lot of published data 7 indicating toxic effects, both acute and chronic as well as 8 carcinogenic potential, as well as teratogenic effects. 9 But to just be able to state that yes, it will 10 cause birth defects, it's not something that you can do 11 without further study. 12 I will also mention chat within the city of 13 Hermosa Beach. you could look at your gas stations, your dry 14 cleaners, your surfboard manufacturer -- I guess we had some 15 represented here -- all of your garage shops, your body 16 shops and so'forth -- all use hydrocarbon -based solvents. 17 This is what the doctor had indicated in his letter as being 18 potentially teratogenic_ 19 MR. EDGERTON: Correct. 20. MARTHA BROCK: That is correct. But the real 21 question is what is the exposure. And what our calculations 22 indicate is that you are going to have a total toxic 23 emission or carcinogen emission of less than .06 pounds per 24 day, which translates into a maximum individual cancer risk 25 of less than three in one hundred million, which is pretty AR7716 003620 1�1 KA9MAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES I 1 i f 1 1 05/12/9..8.. TUE 16:10 F 910 452 0058 Macpherson 011 co 410 _— . A% arc .I1u 1 G1Uc:'i.7.7CL.) ei 0,13 P.12/21 1 insignificant by the standards set forth by the AQMD. 2 MR. EDGERTON: Let's figure out who you are again. 3 I'm getting a little tired here. Are you paid 4 MARTHA BROCK: I am a paid consultant. 5 MR. EDGERTON: You are a paid consultant by Mr. 6 Macpherson? 7 MARTHA BROCK: Yes. a MR. EDGERTON: Okay. Do you think there's anyone out 9 there who would disagree with you? 10 vOICE: Yes_ 11 MR. EDGERTON: No, no. But. I mean, do you think 12 there's any experts out there that might disagree with you? 13 MAYOR WIEMANS: We cannot entertain additional 14 testimony after -- 15 MS. MIDSTOKRE: Mr. Edgerton invited the question. 16 JOHN EDWARDS: I think the paint was 17 MR. EDGERTON: Hang on a second. I've got to clear is it and see -- there's a big socialistic gathering up here. 19 I don't carry the day. 20 JOHN EDWARDS: I just want to clarify two points 21 of 22 MAYOR WIEMANS: Do we want to hear this gentleman? 23 Ms. Midstokke, do you want to hear the gentleman? 24 JOHN EDWARDS: I can be very -- 25 MR. ESSERTIER The question is do we want to tolerate An2237 U U .th i. 113 KAsSMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES 05/12/98 TUE 16:10FA% A10 41110058 Macpherson 011 co 0 - -- —. 7 a arcvWll U1CC'4.7�CG.7 P.13'21 1 the line of questioning from Mr. Edgerton,. 2 MR_ EDGERTON: Tolerate? 3 MAYOR WIEMANS: I feel the more I hear, the better of 4 an opinion I can render. 5 MR. EDGERTON: Unless you believe that ignorance is 6 bliss. 7 JO} T EDWARDS : 1 would like to just correct two 8 things and give you a quick feedback as to what we could 9 do to help you_ 10 One thing I wanted to mention is the vapor 11 pressure -- 1 agree totally that benzene is a carcinogen, 12 It ranges actually up to about 2 percent, Depends on where 13 you get it. Y think that if there is data on Redondo 14 fields, it may be more pertinent. 15 But the other is that it's heavier than air. 16 It's not lighter. The vapor pressure is 2.7 times air. And 17 I think that we have models, air models, and we use a heavy 18 gas model in this case that can Show you if you give a 7,9 particular emission what the concentration isoplus would be 20 in the area, and you can overlay that on a map. 21 I'm working on that, but I didn't have enough 22 detail out of the risk assessment to be able to do that. As 23 I understand, there may be more in the EIR, and I would like 24 to get it and pursue that. 25 There's also an industrial hygeist for the air O U 3 6 2 J AR2238 114 KASMAR, ZAN'GLIS & ASSOCIATES a1014 05/12/98 TUE 16:10 FAX 310 452 0058Macpherson 011 co Q Q15 --- __ • • P.14/21 x 1 force who lives in Hermosa and he's working with me on that. 2 So we would like to prepare that and send it to you gratis. 3 The other point I wanted to make is that one of 1 4 the people who was speaking about whether or not they were going to spill oil. In the risk assessment itself, it said 6 that risk of a spill was likely. Arid we were basing this 7 emission on a spill in a puddle model and looking at what 8 would the concentration be in the surrounding communities. 1 9 So that's just a couple points I wanted to 10 make. There are other carcinogens, by the way. But we're 11 going through and trying to -- 1 12 MR. EDGERTON: Do you disagree with anything 7�'t g s h e 13 said? 14 JOHN EDWARDS: Well, two things that she said_ One 1.5 is that she said that it was lighter. It's actually 16 heavier. So you use a heavy gas model which is a different 17 approach. 18 The second thing that I with disagree ' 9 Y h is that. 111 19 of course, if your assumptions are wrong about some of these 20 things -- for example, the original concentration of benzene 21 in the crude oil -- that will make a difference in the 22 answer that you get, as will the model type that you use. 23 So I think that there is more -- and, in fact, 24 we are trying to do this in a way that's Eairly rigorous and 25 I will give this to the City. AR2239 i KASMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES U U 5 d- 3 115 05/12/98 TUE 16:11_FA% 310 4058 .. .�..a arc,Wl`I Macpherson 011 co • @jo16 U1rsc4mJc.c P.15/21 1 MR. ESSERTIER: Mr. Mayor? 2 MAYOR WIEMANS: Mr. Edgerton, wasour Y question 3 answered? 4 MR. EDGERTON; Yes_ Thank you very much. 5 MAYOR WIEMANS: Mr. Essertier. 6 MR. ESSERTIER: Is it your understanding that the 7 AQMD monitors these emissions into the air? 8 JOHN EDWARDS: AQMD is designated by the State, who 9 is designated by EPA, to implement the Clean Air Act, and 10 they are implemented to da it for stationary sources. And 11 the area that they cover has traditionally been criteria 12 pollutants; NOx, SOx. Those kinds of things. 13 What's happened over time is they have 14 increased this to include hazardous air pollutants. So they 15 are starting each air pollution control district -- by 16 the way, Santa Barbara is probably tougher than L.A. also. 17 But each group has its own way of handling those things. le In the past they have done it under nuisance 19 and other areas in the regulations. The hazardous air 20 pollutants under New Cleats Air Act, Congress said you're 21 taking too long to list them; we're going to give you a list 22 of them right here. You go through the list and try to deal 23 with it. 24 However, the way to implement and deal with 25 those are under development. As a previous speaker noted, KASMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES AR2240 OU3til_q 1.16 05/12/98 TUE 16:11 FAX 310 452 0058 Macpherson 011 co MRY 12 '98 10:46RM BRIGH, BROWN 8182433225 • a0,17 0,17 P.16'21 1 they are looking at ways to control those things down to 2 lower levels. 3 That's why in my comments to the Planning 4 Commission's Conditional Use Permit, I suggested that they 5 use the lowest achievable emission rate, which is something 6 that is well-defined and it is well -- there are ways to do 7 it now without having to wait for the new types of 8 regulations. So it's in a state of flux. There's birthing 9 pains going on_ Just to answer your question. 10 MR. ESSERTIER! So you are disputing the fact that 11 the AQMD won't tolerate an emission that exceeds one part 12 per million. Is that right? 13 JOHN EDWARDS: It's not one part -- it's a one chance 14 in a million. 1 guess what I'm disputing is whether or not 15 that's the case. And what I would say is I don't know 16 that's the case yet until we go through this analysis. And 17 1 believe that the analysis that's been up to date is 18 faulty. So I would try to base it on more realistic 19 parameters. 20 MR. ESSERTIER: I'm talking about the AQMD, not 21 Macpherson. 22 JOHN EDwARDS: Okay_ 23 MR. ESSERTIER: The AQMD put the standard at one unit 24 per million_ 25 JOIN BDWARDS: Right. And they rely on you to aive AR2241 117 KASMAR, ZANOLIS & ASSOCIATES 1103625 . • 1 them something that is correct. 2 MR. BENZ: Could you please explain your statement 3 that benzene has a vapor pressure of 2.7 times air? 4 JOLT EDWARDS: Yes. It's actually in the package 5 that I submitted today. I gave a cover letter, but I only 6 had one with the attachments on it. 1 7 MR. BENZ: But air is what? 20.9 percent oxygen, the e rest nitrogen. What does that mean? 9 JOHN EDWARDS: What it means -- essentially one way 1 10 to think of it is that it's heavier than air. SQ if you 11 release some on the ground, it doesn't go up unless it's 12 hot. It stays around the ground. 13 MR, BENZ: The vapor pressure if I'm correct on 14 this and I'm reasonably sure I am -- is the pressure at 15 which this stuff boils. It has really 3 nothin to do with 16 the heaviness of the molecule_ You're right, that the 17 molecule is heavier than air. 19 However, vapor pressure has to do -- and it 11 19 varies with temperature too. So I really dispute whether 20 you really know what vapor pressure is. 21 JOHN EDWARDS: Well, what I did is 1 submitted to 22 you, but I didn't give it to all the members of the board 23 here �4 MR. BENZ: For instance, like water will boil at 212. 25 That means the vapor pressure at that time is 14.7 pounds AR2242 003620 lie t KASMAR, ZANGLXS sA ASSOCIATES 05/12/98 TUE 16:11 FAX _310..454. 0058 MacPherson 011 co 019 ������� • P.18/21° 1 per square inch. So it boils. That's what vapor pressure 2 is. It has nothing to do with the heaviness, except for the 3 fact that the molecules that are heavier- have a tendency to 1 4 have a higher vapor pressure. 5 Now water is an anomaly because it has a lot of 6 hydrogen bonding. But you should check u that. on Ok ay. 1 7 JOHN EDWARDS: Well, let me just tell you that I did 8 check up on it and it is in the package that you have right 9 here. 1 to MAYOR WIEMANS: Thank you very much_ 11 (Indistinct voices.) 1 12 MAYOR WIEMANS: No, sir we cannot open it p again. 13 Ma'am, have you any -- 14 MARTHA BROCK: I would like to provide clarification. 15 First of all, the study that was done using the AQMD QMD 1.6 guidelines was not biased. The .07 percent benzene content 17 was based on laboratory evaluations taken from a Wilmington 18 oil field. 1 21 fields and found the range to be .01 to .1 percent..06 3 So 19 Additionally, we took laboratory evaluations of 20 benzene and crude oil from various Southern California oil 1 22 percent is not an underestimation, number one. 23 Number two, benzene can occur in crude oil at 24 higher concentrations, but not in this immediate area. If 2S you go up to take Alaskan crude, some of the Santa Barbara AR2243 003627 119 KASMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES 05/12/98 TUE 16:12 FAX 310 4 058 Macpherson Oil co MAY 12 '98 10:47AM BRIGHT OWN 8182433225 P.19/21 a020 1 crude, you might find higher levels, but it is dependent on 2 the types of field that you working within_ 3 And this was based on actual laboratory data. 4 I am a paid consultant by Macpherson, but I do not bias my 5 work based on who's doing it. When they ask me to run an 6 evaluation, I run the evaluation. They take the results, 7 like it or not. 8 The other thing I would like to mention is I 9 indicated that the benzene does volatilize. It also should 10 be remembered that the oil in the tank is heated above 11 ambient temperatures because of the heater treater treatment 12 to demulsify the oil. So you would tend to have a 13 volatilization effect. 14 The other question that was asked and the other 15 gentleman wasn't quite sure was whether or not the AQMD 16 would, in fact, enforce the one in a million risk 17 assessment. Yes, they must by their own rules and 18 regulations. Rule 1401 requires the executiVe officer to 19 deny a permit should a risk of greater than one in a million 20 be shown. 21 With regard to the permit applicant entering 22 his own or providing his own information, that's true, but 23 it is rigorously checked.by the AQMD engineers. Similarly, 24 if you use a certified permit preparer, such as we have on 25 our Staff, they have to be certified annually, and aro., AR2244 003628 120 X.SMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES 05/12/98 TUE 16:12 FAX 310 452.0058 Macpherson 011 co 411 111 CJ o ? 1 P.20,21 1 falsification would be grounds for taking away their 2 certification.. Thank you. 3 MR_ EDGERTON: One last question. Let's just say 4 this is Alaskan crude. Let's say something happens. We 5 pump the oil out and, lo and behold, this is just like 6 Alaskan crude. what's the risk of cancer in that case? ? MARTHA BROOK: As I recall, the last Alaskan crude B benzene analysis we ran was on North Slope Alaskan crude, 9 and that benzene content was in about the .12 percent range. 10 And this is pretty much a linear relationship. So a little 11 less than double the impact. 12 But since you are talking in the order of 13 magnitude of ten to the minus eight or one in a hundred 14 million as a risk factor -- 15 MR. EDGERTON: Right. That's what I understood_ 16 MARTHA BROCK: -- it won't make much of a difference. 17 What you're going to be doing is taking the three times ten 18 to the minus eight and, say, doubling it to six in ten to 19 the minus eight, 20 MR. EDGERTON: So how would that be with respect to a 21 population of one million? What • s the ratio then? 22 MARTHA BROCK:, Six. 23 MR. EDGERTON: To one million? 24 MARTHA BROCK: Oh, no, no, no. It would be .06. 25 MR_ EDGERTON: .06 to one million. KASMAR, ZANGLIS & ASSOCIATES AR2245 00362:i 121 05/12/98 TUE 16:12 FA% 310 452 0058 Macpherson Oil co • 110 1 MARTHA BROCK: Right, TWQ orders of magnitude. 2 MR. EDGERTON: Okay. A11 right_ Thank you very P.21'21 3 much_ 4 MAYOR Wt MANS: Thank you. 5 DON MACPHERSON: I just wanted to make a follow-up on 6 your question of vibration. Mr. John van Houten, who is 7 here and he was hired bar the City on the Environmental 8 Impact Report, he wrote that and he studied vibrations 9 is here to respond to your question. 10 JOHN VAN HOUTEN: I'm John van Houten. I'm a 11 registered -- are you hearing me all right? 12 MAYOR WIEMANS: Yes. We hear you. 13 JOIIlv VAN HOUTEN: I'm John van Houten. .1'm a 14 registered professional engineer in the state. My office is 19 in Anaheim, California. 16 I was retained by Angus Petroleum Company as 17 the acoustical engineer on the Huntington Beach job, and we 18 routinely made measurements of noise very similar to the 19 conditions of approval with regard to monitoring. 20 One of the requirements was to submit reports 21 three days after each of measurement study. Well, I 22 included all my vibration measurements in that. I don't 23 recall that it was a requirement. We just decided to 24 produce all of the reports, all data that came from the 25 site, we produced it to the City. and KASMAR, ZANGLXS & ASSOCIATES AR2246 003630 122 (1022 SOP OIL NEWS — MAY 199 To: Susan Jordan, Terry Tamminen, Jim Tarr FYI: PRESS RELEASE May 20 - Wednesday Hermosa Beach Stop Oil invites all concerned residents to attend a Town Forum to be held at the Clark Stadium Building in Hermosa at 9th and Valley Drive. The forum will begin at 7:30 p.m. on Wed., May 20. "Ever since the new city safety reports came out, Stop Oil has received an avalanche of calls from concerned residents", said member Kimberly Andrew. "People want answers in plain English and they are especially worried whether the new toxic gas and pipeline issues will affect them. Basically, what we're hearing is, Can we still stop oil? and we want to answer that question". Speakers will include nationally -known environmental toxicologist Jim Tarr, President of Stone Lions Environmental Corp. , Susan Jordan, of League for Coastal Protection, and Terry Tamminen, of Santa Monica Baykeeper. Other speakers will represent the real estate and legal professions and address how oil drilling could impact Hermosa property values, hurt the local economy and disappoint leaseholds. The meeting will provide a question and answer period and refreshments will be served. Background: In 1984, voters allowed a limited exception to the city's half -century oil drilling ban to pay for the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt and other open space. Macpherson Oil Co. paid for the entire campaign to a//ow drilling. Almost immediately, the original six -well concept mushroomed into a massive 35 -well, tank farm, tanker truck & pipeline project that would severely impact Hermosa's beach cottage character. Oil Derricks, so tall they will be lit up at night time to warn off airplanes, will be seen from over half of Hermosa's homes over the projects 30 year life. Residents began to actively seek alternatives to solve Hermosa's financial and open space challenges. In 1986, they passed Measures j and K to pay for the greenbe/t. Soon all the available open space in the city was purchased and preserved without having to resort to oil drilling. In 1995, residents of Hermosa Beach reinstated the city's oil drilling ban by passing Measure E. Because the city has not discouraged Macpherson Oil Co. from proceeding with its plans, Stop Oil has taken the issue of enforcing the drilling ban to court. Hermosa Beach Stop Oil is a local group of concerned residents working to uphold the vote to ban oil drilling in Hermosa Beach. Goal: to raise awareness and funding to Stop the Oil Drilling that is planned to happen very shortly from ever taking place. For more information, please call (310) 379-5698 Ocean oil V'-ekly rt i http•//www/-1-- pdpn.com/oceanoil/7-29.htm -y • OCEAN OIL The Greensheet a gonna' for sews, analysis, statistics, and ;market trends since 1965. WEEKLY REPORT A PENNWELL PUBLICATION July 29, 1996 CHOOSE FROM THE FOLLOWING MENU: *GLOBAL NEWS *GULF OF MEXICO NEWS *WESTERN EUROPE UPDATE *WEST AFRICA UPDATE *ASIA/PACIFIC UPDATE *BRIEFS *SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATIOIVI *STOCK REPORT *US GULF - PLATFORM CHANGES *US GULF - UPCOMING WILDCATS * US GULF - DRILLING PLANS * US GULF - RIG RELOCATIONS US GULF - RIG UTILIZATION *OFFSHORE RIG REPORT GLOBAL NEWS MAJORS POOLING DRILLING EXPERTISE Four major oil companies plan to pool expertise in developing upstream technology and in the process boosting earnings by at least $100 million a year. The companies - British Petroleum, Chevron, Texaco and Mobil - will concentrate initially on drilling techniques but will later extended the co-operation to cover other areas. All products to emerge from the joint initiatives will be shared but the companies will continue to compete in the way technologies are applied. BP's chief executive for technology David Jenkins said the program was broader and more ambitious than traditional joint ventures between oil companies. "This is about enhancing capabilities, not reducing costs," he said. Stephen Richardson, head of exploration technology provision for BP, said the drilling program alone aimed to deliver $100 million annual value for each company within five years from the application of new technology. At present, the four companies together spend a total of $4 billion on worldwide drilling operations. BP executives do not rule out the possibility of other companies joining the trans-Atlantic alliance as permanent members for specific projects. Already, BP has technology partnerships in Europe with Norway's Statoil and France's Elf. Preliminary work has started through contact with research organizations in the US and Europe to identify specific technologies - including fiOcean (7};,1 V ekly . • • http://www.pdpn.com/oceanoil/7-29.htm research organizations in the US and Europe to identify specific technologies - including coiled -tubing and multi -lateral wells - on which initial effort can focus. Studies will also be carried out on the use of advanced information technology and possible applications for robotics within wells. "An important building block in general has been relying less on internal resources and concentrating on accessing the best in the world," Richardson said. Mike Tweedy, a drilling advisor for Chevron, said a learning approach to drilling operations could offer huge rewards by reducing numbers of wells and speeding up data analysis.(ff) Aet Return to To ............................ • GULF OF MEXICO NEWS WARNING TO US GAS PRODUCERS When electrical power distribution is finally deregulated in the US, the event will provide fierce competition for the gas industry and force a restructuring of downstream pipeline and gas distribution. These were the comments of Larry Bickle, chairman and CEO of TPC Corp. in the Houston Chronicle. He said that while wellhead prices for gas have dropped 27% over the past 10 years, burner tip prices for residential customers have dropped only 5%. This suggests that the upstream impact of restructuring has not impacted downstream distribution. The competition, when it arrives, could substantially impact both gas usage and prices. "The electric power industry appears to be on the verge of deregulating on a much broader and more sweeping scale than the gas industry. If this happens, the retail price of electricity to the consumer could drop dramatically." The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has been a large part of the problem, since it is stifling the development of hub networks and new pipeline competitors, and allowing pass-through of distribution expansion costs. US GULF VESSEL RATES CLIMBING Major supply vessel fleet operator Tidewater said that vessels being committed for new work in the US Gulf of Mexico are now being signed at rates as high as $5,500/day. Supply vessel day rates in the first quarter of this year averaged slightly under $4,300, but by the end of the first quarter rates had already slid up to $4,700, says Tidewater's chairman, William O'Malley. "The current strength of the Gulf of Mexico market continues to push rates for Tidewater's fleet even higher," he pointed out. OPERATORS OWE US GOVERNMENT The US Department of Interior is seeking about $440 million from 20 operators that worked offshore California between 1980 and 1995. The 20 are Arco, Chevron, Exxon, Mobil, Philips, Shell, Texaco, Unocal, Koch Industries, MacPherson Oil, Marathon, Oryx, Oxbow Geothermal, Occidental, Pacific Operators, Pennzoil, Santa Fe Energy, Seneca Oil, Torch Oil & Gas, and Union Pacific Resources. The US government says the 20 companies used a different benchmark price for oil, thereby underpaying royalties to the US government. SABLE ISLAND PROJECT UNDERWAY • ASC ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO-OP May 1, 1998 Stephen Burrell City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Burrell: • t--e--e) We are writing to request that the city council set agenda time to discuss the licensing of taxicabs under the new city code. We feel the council should determine which taxi companies will be licensed to operate in Hermosa Beach. Prior to rewriting the city code, only three tax companies played by the rules and went to the trouble of getting a Hermosa Beach business license and adequate liability insurance. As taxi operators that have served Hermosa Beach for many years, we feel that simple fairness would dictate that the previously licensed companies: AM/PM — Manhattan Yellow Cab; South Bay Yellow — United Checker Cab; and America's Best Cab should be given priority in licensing. If these operators are unable to qualify or do not provide adequate service other cab companies could be considered. Siroos Moatazedi Manager AM/PM Taxi 14; 4-heif-f--L Jim Hanneman Marketing Manager South Bay Yellow Cab L.A. TAXI CO -OPO LONG BEACH YELLOW CAB O SOUTH BAY YELLOW CAB CO-OP O UNITED CHECKER CAB CO-OP a FIESTA TAXI CO-OP 2129 W. ROSECRANS AVENUE O OARDENA, CA 90249 a )310) 715.1968 • • MINUTES'OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 28, 1998, at the hour of 7:20 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Iry Ruben ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Reviczky, Mayor Pro Tempore Benz Absent: Oakes, Mayor Edgerton (arrived at 8:24 P.M.) MAYOR'S COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS: Councilmember Reviczky announced that the next workshop for the Skateboard Track would be next Wednesday, May 6, 1998, at 7:00 P.M. at the proposed site at the Community Center and urged those interested to attend. Councilmember Bowler congratulated the hard work and dedication shown by the 100 young people who had attended the last Skateboard Track workshop. PROCLAMATION: NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK: MAY 17-23, 1998 Mayor Pro Tempore Benz donned an orange Public Works vest, read the Proclamation and presented it to Public Works Director Harold Williams, Public Works Superintendent Michael Flaherty and Public Works Contract Engineer Joe Mankawich. Director Williams thanked the Council for recognizing the Public Works Department and its contribution to the community. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Iry Ruben - non-resident, spoke in favor of allowing unleashed small dogs at large; Celeste Coar - Loma Drive, said that she had not received prior notice of, and expressed opposition to, the proposed change in preferential parking regulations which would allow year-round, until 10:00 P.M., resident permit parking; Maria West - 615 Seventh Street, spoke in favor of civil disobedience against the leash law for small dogs; Merna Marshall - 33rd Place, spoke in opposition to the proposed changes in preferential parking regulations and said that she had not received notice of the hearing; asked that it be imposed only in the downtown area; Lisa Ryder - 1940 Monterey Blvd., presented petition in opposition to the proposed changes in preferential parking regulations and said that she had not received notice of the hearing; suggested a different time schedule; Lauren Gezurian - 833 14th Street, asked that item 1(k) be removed from the consent calendar in City Council Minutes 04-28-98 Page 9681 la • • order to ask the Council to appeal item #15 regarding a project at 840 15th Street; submitted information; and, Don Karasevicz - 840 15th Street, owner and developer of the property in question above, spoke in favor of his project and requested a copy of information submitted by Ms. Gezurian. (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS: Councilmember Reviczky questioned the noticing for the preferential parking changes. City Manager Stephen Burrell said that the Coastal Commission had mailed out over 8,000 notices. City Manager Burrell removed several items from the agenda noting that the following items would be continued to the meeting of May 12, 1998: item c(1) at the request of Roger Bacon; and items 1(j) and 6 at the request of staff. Mr. Burrell said that the public hearing, item 4, needed to be continued for additional research. At 7:52 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearing, item 4. (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: 1. Letter from Roger Bacon dated April 7, 1998 regarding permits for fundraising activities in Greenwood Park. Action: Mayor Pro Tempore Benz directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998, as requested by Roger Bacon, author of the letter. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) 2. Letter from Gary Kazaniian dated April 13, 1998 regarding street parking in front of driveways by property owners/renters. Action: To direct staff to research this request and return to Council with a recommendation. Motion Bowler, second Mayor Pro Tempore Benz. The motion carried, noting the absence of Oakes and Mayor Edgerton. 3. Letter from Russell Keller dated April 21, 1998 re placement of a vendor cart on Lower Pier Avenue. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Russell Keller - spoke to his letter and explained the process for vending carts in Santa Monica; responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions saying that the City has been gathering letters of City Council Minutes 04-28-98 Page 9682 • • interest on vending carts but does not have a method for evaluating or processing requests at this time. Action: To direct staff to research methods used in other cities and return to Council with suggestions to start the process. Motion Bowler, second Mayor Pro Tempore Benz. The motion carried, noting the absence of Oakes and Mayor Edgerton. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (1) with the exception of item (j) which was withdrawn and continued by staff to the next meeting and the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (e) Reviczky and (k) Bowler for Lauren Gezurian. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Oakes and Mayor Edgerton. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on April 14, 1998. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 14, 1998, as presented. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 13401 THROUGH 13546 INCLUSIVE, NOTING VOIDED CHECK NO. 13542, AND TO APPROVE CANCELLATION OF CHECK NOS. 12300, 13391 AND 13407 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY TREASURER. (c) Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE MARCH, 1998, FINANCIAL REPORTS. Action: To receive and file the memorandum regarding the delay of the March, 1998, Financial Reports due to preparation of the 1998-99 City Budget. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) City Council Minutes 04-28-98 Page 9683 • (e) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE DONATIONS TO THE POLICE AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENTS. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 20, 1998. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting in order to recognize the donors and publicly thank them. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to appropriate the following donations from:. 1. Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club for $112.00 to the Police Department for motorcycle equipment; and, 2. Marketing and Promotions for $227.01 to the Community Resources Department for "Eggstravaganza." Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting the absence of Oakes and Mayor Edgerton. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 15, 1998. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of April 15, 1998. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND PROJECT TOUCH FOR THE USE OF ROOM 3 IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 20, 1998. Action: To approve the Park, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to: 1) approve the one-year lease agreement between the Project Touch and the City for the use of Room 3 in the Community Center at a rate of $492 per month (529 sq.ft. X $.93 per sq.ft.) from June 1, 1998, through June 30, 1998, and $518.42 per month (529 sq.ft. X $.98 per sq.ft.) from July 1, 1998, through May 31, 1999, for a total rental income of $6,221; and, 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the lease. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) (h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998-1999 AT $.98 PER SQUARE FOOT AND FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 AT $1.03 PER SQUARE FOOT AND APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING LEASES. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 20, 1998. (g) Action: To approve the Park, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation: City Council Minutes 04-28-98 Page 9684 1 1. Approve a five cent ($.05) per sq. ft lease rate increase for each of the next two years as follows: a) FY 1998-1999 @ $.98 per square foot, and b) FY 1999-2000 Q $1.03 per square foot; and, 2. Approve Amendments to existing leases with South Bay Free Clinic, Easter Seal Society, South Bay Center for Counseling, The Association for Retarded Citizens - Southwest, and Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools to reflect the newly approved lease rates. (Oakes and, Mayor Edgerton absent) (i) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AS THE DESIGNATED AGENT FOR ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO FEDERAL AND STATE DISASTER ASSISTANCE. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated April 23, 1998. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 98-5914, entitled, "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AS DESIGNATED AGENT TO PROVIDE, TO THE STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES, FOR ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO SUCH STATE DISASTER ASSISTANCE, THE ASSURANCES AND AGREEMENTS REQUIRED." (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) (j) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH L.A. COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS FOR THE EDUCATIONAL SITE VISIT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated April 13, 1998. Action: Mayor Pro Tempore Benz directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998, as requested by staff. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) (k) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 21, 1998. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Bowler, at the request of Lauren Gezurian, for separate discussion of #15 later in the meeting. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Lauren Gezurian - 833 14th Street, explained her concerns with the project regarding a 30 foot facade and the front door on the rear of the building directly facing her property; Donald Karasevicz - owner and developer of the project, spoke to his development; said it had been set back so that it would not obstruct the views on 15th Street; and, City Council Minutes 04-28-98 Page 9685 • • Aslam Amlani - 833 14th Street, said that his neighbor also is not in favor of this project but could not be here tonight. Community Development Director Blumenfeld and City Manager Burrell both responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of April 21, 1998, with the exception of #15. Motion Mayor Pro Tempore Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting the absence of Oakes and Mayor Edgerton. Action: To set item #15, Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan And Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #21493 for a two -unit condominium at 840 15th Street, for a City Council appeal on Thursday, May 28, 1998. Appellants: Mayor Pro Tempore Benz and Bowler. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) (1) 'RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE FOLLOWING CLAIM AND REFER IT TO THE CITY'S LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated April 22, 1998. Action: To approve following claim and Administrator . 1) Claimant: Date of Loss: Date Filed . Allegation . the staff recommendation to deny the refer to the City's Liability Claims Christopher M. Scott 10/22/97 04/21/98 Claimant alleges he was arrested, searched, and vehicle impounded, without cause or necessity. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(e) and (k) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. At the hour of 8:25 P.M. the order of the agenda continued to item 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES THAT PORTION OF THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE City Council Minutes 04-28-98 Page 9686 1 • • BETWEEN LYNDON STREET AND THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, AS SHOWN ON THE TRACT OF HERMOSA BEACH AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1 PAGES 25 AND 26 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated April 16, 1998. The public hearing opened at 7:52 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing closed at 7:52 P.M. Action: Mayor Pro Tempore Benz directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued for additional research as requested by staff. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) At the hour of 7:53 P.M. the order of the agenda went to item number 6. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. APPLICATION FOR TWO COMMERCIAL EVENTS: BILLIARDS BY THE BEACH (PIER PLAZA) AND STAR 98.7 BENEFIT CONCERT (BEACH). Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 20, 1998. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 8:24 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Michael Shaldron - Billiards on the Beach, agreed with Community Resources Director Rooney that this was a low impact event as it was just billiard tables on the Plaza; said that after expenses he would collect 20 percent of the net proceeds and the additional 80 percent would go to charities, such as the Hermosa Beach Educational Foundation. Action: To approve the staff recommendation the event application and authorize Mayor to contract for Billiards By The Beach, at the for August 21-23, 1998, with estimated fees of Motion Bowler, second Mayor Pro Tempore Benz. carried, noting the absence of Oakes and Mayor to approve sign event Pier Plaza $8,275.36. The motion Edgerton. Continuing to come forward to address the Council were: Robert Lyles - Marketing Director of Star 98.7, said they estimated the crowd at 10,000 minimum as they planned to have an "A" group perform such as Cheryl Crow or Hootie and the Blowfish for this free "live concert on the beach"; said that the station planned lead -up events throughout the day with an emphasis on remote City Council Minutes 04-28-98 Page 9687 • • parking and shuttle use, possibly with preferential seating with shuttle use; and said they planned to use the same production company as before; Tom Binnion - 244 34th Street, with Star 98.7, said that this would be a tremendous publicity opportunity for the City; Dr. Mark Gold - Executive Director, Heal the Bay, said that Heal the Bay would be unable to be a co-sponsor of this event due to a commitment to Coastal Clean-up Day on the same date of September 19th; wished to clear a misconception by stating that Heal the Bay has never sued the City of Hermosa Beach and has worked to make the Herondo Storm Drain a #1 priority; and, Unidentified man - stressed that there would be a problem with that time period as the Pier was scheduled for repair and the Parking Structure would be under construction. Mayor Edgerton arrived at 8:48 P.M. Public participation closed at 9:07 P.M. Community Resources Director Rooney and City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Police Chief Val Straser also responded to Council questions saying that 10 to 15 officers would be used as 10,000 to 12,000 people in attendance was a realistic figure as the area could not hold more people. Action: To approve in concept the Star 98.7 Benefit Concert for September 19, 1998, with estimated fees of $12,475.40, and, with the addition to the contract that the first $25,000 of profit would accrue wholly to the Hermosa Beach Dedicated Storm• Drain Diversion Fund and any funds above that amount would be shared equally with a charity of the performers' choice. Motion Bowler, second Mayor Pro Tempore Benz. The motion carried, noting the absence of Oakes. Coming forward to address the Council was: Michael Fleisher - 84 Strand, requested to speak on item 4 and said that he was upset at the problems that had arisen regarding this project. The meeting recessed at 9:10 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:45 P.M. and went to item 7. 6. TRAFFIC STUDY - 6th STREET, 8th STREET AND ARDMORE AVENUE WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 20, 1998. City Council Minutes 04-28-98 Page 9688 • • Action: Mayor Pro Tempore Benz directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998, as requested by staff. (Oakes and Mayor Edgerton absent) At the hour of 7:54 P.M. the order of the agenda was returned to written communications, item c(1). 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. CONFIRM MEETING DATE OF MONDAY, JUNE 1, 1998, FOR BUDGET WORKSHOP. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 22, 1998. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To accept the date of June 1, 1998, for the budget workshop by Council consensus. (Oakes absent) 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. FAIR HOUSING AMENDMENTS ACT OF 1998 - HR3206. (Continued from meeting of April 14, 1998) Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 30, 1998. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To receive and file this item. Motion Benz, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Oakes. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: Gary Vincent - Fat Face Fenner's Falloon (FFFF), would appreciate a timely return of the Council review of FFFF's request. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, April 28, 1998, at the hour of 9:50 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, May 12, 1998, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 04-28-98 Page 9689 • VOUCHRE2 04/27/98 09:11 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS • LE' PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 13547 04/27/98 006421 ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPARTMENT 001-2201-4309 314.60 314.60 13548 04/27/98 008684 CAROLYN ALPER CITATION REFUND 13549 04/27/98 007179 AMERICAN THEATER ARTS RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 110-3302 10.00 10.00 001-2111 447.50 001-2111 454.50 902.00 13550 04/27/98 003423 AT & T CELL LONG DIST/OCT 97 -FEB 98 001-2101-4304 2.79 2.79 13551 04/27/98 005179 AT&T 13552 04/27/98 008630 AVIS LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/FEB 98 001-1208-4304 372.35 LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/MAR 98 001-1208-4304 415.41 LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/MAR 98 001-2101-4304 5.80 LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/MAR 98 001-2101-4304 5.79 LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/MAR 98 001-4202-4304 5.80 LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/MAR 98 001-4204-4321 5.80 LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/MAR 98 001-4202-4304 7.41 LONG DIST GHRGS/MAR 98 001-4202-4304 6.32 824.68 CITATION REFUND 110-3302 20.00 20.00 13553 04/27/98 000894 THOMAS BOHLIN TUITION/GAINES 001-2101-4312 120.00 MEALS/POST CLASS 001-2101-4312 38.00 158.00 13554 04/27/98 008683 GARY BOTELHO REFUND PARKING PERMIT 110-3843 28.00 28.00 13555 04/27/98 005595 CALIFORNIA CHARTER TRANSPORTATION/EXCURISION 145-3409-4201 327.88 327.88 13556 04/27/98 008686 MATTHEW CALVANI CITATION REFUND 110-3302 50.00 50.00 13557 04/27/98 000354 COAST IRRIGATION CO. PALM FERTILIZER 105-2601-4309 27.96 27.96 13558 04/27/98 006100 DATAVAULT OFF SITE STORAGE/MARCH 98 001-1206-4201 149.50 149.50 13559 04/27/98 008371 DOUBLETREE HOTEL -DEL MA LODGING/MILLER/POST CLASS 001-2101-4312 436.48 436.48 13560 04/27/98 001498 DYNAMED MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT. 001-2201-4309 176.88 176.88 13561 04/27/98 006974 EMBASSY SUITES LODGING/BOHLIN & GAINES 13562 04/27/98 007803 EMPLOYER RESOURCE INSTI SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 13563 04/27/98 002822 GARTH GAINES MEALS/POST CLASS 001-2101-4312 260.70 260.70 001-1203-4305 177.00 177.00 001-2101-4312 38.00 38.00 13564 04/27/98 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR 98 001-2101-4304 71.28 TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR 98 001-2101-4304 46.65 TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR 98 001-2101-4304 45.14 TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR 98 001-2101-4304 45.91 TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR 98 001-2101-4304 45.91 TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR 98 001-2101-4304 94.44 TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR 98 001-2101-4304 89.28 TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR 98 001-2101-4304 91.88 1 VOUCHRE2 04/27/98 09:11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/FEB BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR BILLING/MAR 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98+ 13565 04/27/98 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. TEMP BUILDING INSPECT/3/16-31 PLAN CHECKS/2/18-3/25/98 PLAN CHECKS/3/2-3/23/98 13566 04/27/98 008411 HEARTLAND FOODS 13567 04/27/98 003432 HOME DEPOT/GECF 13568 04/27/98 008685 DARRYL HUGHES PRISONER MEALS/MARCH 98 ELECTRICAL FIXTURES/MAR 98 CITATION REFUND 13569 04/27/98 005254 INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP COMPUTER EQUIP MAINT/APRIL 98 COMPUTER EQUIP MAINT/APRIL 98 13570 04/27/98 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE STREET LIGHT BULBS 13571 04/27/98 000151 L.A. CO SHERIFF'S DEPAR BOOKING FEES/JAN 98 13572 04/27/98 007564 RUTH MILLER 13573 04/27/98 001319 MIRA COSTA COLLEGE MEALS/POST CLASS TUITION/HIGGINS 13574 04/27/98 008678 MIRA COSTA COLLEGE, STN TUITION/HIGGINS 13575 04/27/98 002487 PAGING NETWORK OF ORANG PAGING SERVICES/FEB 98 PAGING SERVICES/FEB 98 PAGING SERVICES/FEB 98 PAGING SERVICES/FEB 98 PAGING SERVICES/FEB 98 PAGING SERVICES/FEB 98 PAGING SERVICES/FEB 98 13576 04/27/98 008671 PMG INC. • ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4601-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-1206-4304 001-4601-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4304 001-1206-4304 001-4201-4201 001-4201-4201 001-4201-4201 001-2101-4306 001-4204-4309 110-3302 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 105-2601-4309 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4312 001-2101-4312 001-2101-4312 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-1201-4201 110-3302-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 001-1206-4201 ROADSPIKE BARRIER STRIP 153-2106-5402 2 ITEM AMOUNT 86.05 65.72 66.79 28.67 50.87 23.07 30.36 27.74 43.33 408.15 64.61 58.62 32.85 87.76 31.68 30.19 70.80 3,860.00 7,716.28 6,641.58 96.99 192.15 50.00 457.80 305.20 833.25 145.84 140.00 13.00 25.00 43.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 58.19 117.99 2.25 1,677.88 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 1,737.75 18,217.86 96.99 192.15 50.00 763.00 833.25 145.84 140.00 13.00 25.00 228.68 1,677.88 VOUCHRE2 04/27/98 09:11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 13577 04/27/98 003910 PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRA FRONT END ALIGNMENT 13578 04/27/98 008690 PRICE POINT MICROTECHNO 32 RAM MODULES 13579 04/27/98 000296 THE PRINT NETWORK 13580 04/27/98 008482 PRO MEDIX FLYERS PRINTED/SPRING HOCKEY REGISTRATION/EMERGENCY FORMS PROGRAM SUPPLIES/MARCH 98 NO PARKING SIGNS PRINTED MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 13581 04/27/98 001125 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE TUITION/MILLER 13582 04/27/98 005379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS 13583 04/27/98 007922 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPM 13584 04/27/98 008498 SHEPHERD 13585 04/27/98 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP 13586 04/27/98 000170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS LEGAL BILLING/FEB 98 LEGAL BILLING/FEB 98 LEGAL BILLING/FEB 98 LEGAL BILLING/FEB 98 LEGAL BILLING/FEB 98 LEGAL BILLING/FEB 98 LEGAL BILLING/FEB 98 POLICE SAFETY EQUIPMENT CATEPILLAR REPAIRS CATEPILLAR RENTAL SUPPLIES/MARCH 98 GAS BILLING/MAR 98 GAS BILLING/MAR 98 GAS BILLING/MAR 98 GAS BILLING/MAR 98 GAS BILLING/MAR 98 GAS BILLING/MAR 98 13587 04/27/98 000146 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WAT DRINKING WATER/MAR 26 & APR 9 WATER DISPENSER RENT/APRIL 98 13588 04/27/98 004768 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE PRINTER MAINT/APRIL 98 13589 04/27/98 007897 WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CALIF CODE UP -DATES TOTAL CHECKS .3 ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-2101-4311 001-2101-4305 001-4601-4305 001-4601-4305 001-4601-4308 001-4601-4308 001-2201-4309 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4312 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1203-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 153-2106-5401 160-3102-4309 160-3102-4309 001-2101-4306 001-4204-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4601-4305 001-2201-4309 001-1206-4201 001-1121-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 62.50 125.57 227.33 294.99 199.18 216.50 97.43 307.12 237.00 4,517.61 3,183.04 203.69 69.00 37.50 42.80 9,774.20 768.79 5,729.79 876.83 103.56 46.46 115.60 135.66 233.91 111.54 24.50 17.00 2.50 224.00 144.50 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 62.50 125.57 938.00 404.55 237.00 17,827.84 768.79 6,606.62 103.56 667.67 19.50 224.00 144.50 56,155.97 • • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 04/27/98 09:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 45,690.84 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 861.21 110 PARKING FUND 160.25 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 327.88 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 2,446.67 160 SEWER FUND 6,606.62 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 62.50 TOTAL 56,155.97 1-1 PAGE 4 VOUCHRE2 04/30/98 16:25 ---> VOID CHECKS CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS 013621 VOID 013658 VOID s PAGE 1 VOUCHRE2 04/30/98 16:25 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 13590 04/30/98 000029 A-1 COAST RENTALS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION AUTO SPRINGS PURCHASE 13591 04/30/98 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS REPROGRAM SWAT PORTABLES TWO WAY RADIO MAINT/MAY 98 TWO WAY RADIO MAINT/MAY 98 13592 04/30/98 006827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV 13593 04/30/98 000152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/MARCH 98 SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/MARCH 98 MATS CLEANED/MAR 98 RUG SERVICE/MARCH 98 SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/MARCH 98 SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/MARCH 98 MATS CLEANED/MARCH 98 RUG SERVICE/MARCH 98 SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/MARCH 98 SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/APRIL 98 MATS CLEANED/APRIL 98 RUG SERVICE/APRIL 98 SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/APRIL 98 13594 04/30/98 008696 BRUCE ASHMUN 13595 04/30/98 005179 AT&T REFUND PARKING PERMIT LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB LONG DISTANCE CHRS/MARCH DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE FAX CHRG/MAR 98 FAX CHRG/MAR 98 FAX CHRG/MAR 98 FAX CHRG/MAR 98 FAX CHRG/MAR 98 BILLING/FEB 98 CHRGS/MAR 98 CHRGS/MARCH 98 98 98 13596 04/30/98 006409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS ASPHALT PURCHASE/APRIL 98 ASPHALT PURCHASE/APRIL 98 ASPHALT PURCHASE/APRIL 98 BASE ROCK PURCHASE/APRIL 98 ASPHALT PURCHASE/APRIL 98 ASPHALT PURCHASE/APRIL 98 13597 04/30/98 007109 ADAM BURT INSTRUCTORS PAYMENT/SPRING 98 13598 04/30/98 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC WATER BILLING/APRIL 98 13599 04/30/98 000332 CRAIG CASNER WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 13600 04/30/98 000014 CHAMPION CHEVROLET AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 • ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-3104-4311 001-2101-4309 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2102-4201 715-4206-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 715-4206-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-2201-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 715-4206-4309 110-3843 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 110-3302-4304 001-2201-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-2101-4304 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4601-4221 105-2601-4303 001-2110 001-2110 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 ITEM AMOUNT 16.24 265.00 1,504.60 376.15 1,492.09 24.10 10.50 48.51 38.81 24.10 10.50 48.51 38.81 11.40 10.50 48.51 38.81 24.10 28.00 1.69 .93 12.81 1.16 1.25 5.80 3.28 5.80 6.37 11.71 49.10 32.43 48.50 324.38 64.95 93.35 303.10 53.13 1,600.00 1,600.00 1.74 1.74 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 16.24 2,145.75 1,492.09 377.16 28.00 50.80 612.71 303.10 53.13 3,200.00 VOUCHRE2 04/30/98 16:25 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 13601 04/30/98 004534 CMP SUPPLY COMPANY 13602 04/30/98 000325 COAST GLASS COMPANY 13603 04/30/98 000354 COAST IRRIGATION CO. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 PRINTER CARTRIDGES/APRIL 98 GLASS REPLACEMENT/JAIL CELL IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 13604 04/30/98 003674 COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL S TESTING MATERIALS/PERSONNEL 13605 04/30/98 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 13606 04/30/98 007700 CPRS OFFICE SUPPLIES/POLICE DEPT OFFICE EQUIP PURCHASE/POLICE DATE STAMP OFFICE SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 OFFICE SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 OFFICE SUPPLY PURCHASE/ARP 98 OFFICE SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 RECRUITMENT AD 13607 04/30/98 000195 DANIEL FREEMAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL EXAM/CHESSON 13608 04/30/98 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/MARCH 98 DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/APRIL 98 13609 04/30/98 000154 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA SHELTER COST/MARCH 98 13610 04/30/98 008242 LYNDA DESLANDES INSTRUCTORS PAYMENT/SPRING 98 13611 04/30/98 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL FILM PURCHASE/APRIL 98 13612 04/30/98 006178 DOMINO COMPUTER CENTER COMPUTER PURCHASE 13613 04/30/98 008691 EARTHLINK NETWORK 13614 04/30/98 000181 EASY READER LOCAL ER RELAY SETUP PUBLIC NOTICING 13615 04/30/98 007853 EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING & SEWER MAINT CONTRACT/APRIL 98 13616 04/30/98 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 13617 04/30/98 004993 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 13618 04/30/98 008490 FRONTIER STATE BANK 13619 04/30/98 001340 GTE EXPRESS MAIL/MARCH 98 REPAIR GAS DETECTOR WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND EQUIP RENTAL/4/22/98-5/22/98 13620 04/30/98 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO PHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 FAX CHRGS/FEB & MAR 98 FAX CHRGS/FEB & MAR 98 7 ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-2101-4311 001-1206-4305 001-2101-4306 105-2601-4309 001-1203-4201 001-2101-4305 153-2106-5401 001-1202-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1203-4201 001-1203-4320 110-1204-4201 110-1204-4201 110-3302-4251 001-4601-4221 001-4204-4309 001-1206-5402 001-1206-4201 001-1121-4323 160-3102-4201 001-4101-4305 160-3102-4309 001-2110 001-2110 001-2101-4304 110-3302-4304 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 ITEM AMOUNT PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 33.99 37.47 269.11 269.11 201.52 201.52 270.63 270.63 471.00 471.00 367.30 324.65 21.64 1,116.45 121.67 246.31 25.19 2,223.21 42.50 42.50 35.00 35.00 68.32 47.46 115.78 268.01 268.01 387.10 387.10 21.92 21.92 4,361.40 4,361.40 745.00 745.00 346.07 346.07 2,125.00 2,125.00 7.75 7.75 50.00 50.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 3,200.00 51.56 51.56 68.83 24.83 4.17 VOUCHRE2 04/30/98 16:25 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • 13622 04/30/98 008697 SIDNEY HALUSHKA 13623 04/30/98 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. 13624 04/30/98 008411 HEARTLAND FOODS 13625 04/30/98 003131 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS 13626 04/30/98 007587 HOZIE'S RADIATOR 13627 04/30/98 005356 JOHN HUNTER & ASSOC. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION FAX CHRGS/FEB & MAR 98 FAX CHRGS/FEB & MAR 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/FEB 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE. BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 CITATION REFUND TEMP BUILD INSPECT/4/1-4/15/98 PRISONER MEALS/APRIL 98 SALES TAX SERVICE/2ND QTR RECORE RADIATOR/BACK-HOE RADIATOR SERVICED STORMWATER PROGRAM CONTRACT 8 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 110-3302 001-4201-4201 001-2101-4306 001-1202-4201 715-3102-4311 715-4202-4311 160-8302-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 27.90 11.64 13.29 13.29 14.95 13.29 28.24 28.24 84.72 43.19 43.19 655.99 667.79 99.67 99.67 98.01 84.72 84.72 171.10 43.19 5.16 5.16 5.81 5.16 10.97 10.97 32.90 16.77 16.77 1,845.09 259.37 38.71 38.71 38.07 32.90 32.90 66.45 16.77 20.00 2,970.00 49.70 961.18 322.59 125.00 3,045.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 4,903.27 20.00 2,970.00 49.70 961.18 447.59 a VOUCHRE2 04/30/98 16:25 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION STORMWATER PROGRAM CONTRACT 13628 04/30/98 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/MARCH 98 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 13629 04/30/98 006140 INSTASHRED SECURITY SER SHREDDING SERVICE/APRIL 98 13630 04/30/98 008668 INTERNATIONAL COSTUMES, COSTUME RENTAL/EGG STRAVAGANZA 13631 04/30/98 001032 JOHN KEARIN 13632 04/30/98 006293 KINKO'S INC. 13633 04/30/98 008692 KIM KOMICK CONST ADVANCE DISABILITY PENSION/APR COPIES/SPECIAL EVENTS COPIES MADE/MARCH 98 LAMINATED COPIES/MARCH 98 WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 13634 04/30/98 007859 L.A. CO METRO TRANS AUT BUS PASS SALES/APRIL 98 13635 04/30/98 008701 L.A. COUNTY FIRE DEPART UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEE 13636 04/30/98 007575 ISAAC LEVY 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE 13637 04/30/98 007811 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPA TRAFFIC STUDY CONTRACT 13638 04/30/98 008695 MALAGA BANK 13639 04/30/98 004322 JOHN MEBIUS 13640 04/30/98 008090 NIEVES AND ASSOCIATES 13641 04/30/98 000321 PACIFIC BELL 13642 04/30/98 008698 BILL PAWLUK 13643 04/30/98 003820 POSTMASTER WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND ADVANCED DISABILITY/APRIL 98 300' NOTICING SERVICE/APRIL 98 COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/MAR 98 COMPUTER HOOK-UPS/MARCH 98 ACCOUNT NUMBER 160-8302-4201 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 001-2101-4306 001-4601-4308 001-2101-4180 001-4601-4305 126-8525-4201 001-4202-4305 001-2110 145-3403-4251 715-4206-4251 105-3105 001-4101-4201 001-2110 001-2101-4180 001-4101-4201 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 001-2110 POSTAGE/BULK MAIL PERMIT 460 13644 04/30/98 007922 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPM PROTECTIVE FACE MASKS 13645 04/30/98 008165 SASE COMPANY GRINDER BLADES 110-1204-4305 153-2106-5401 001-3104-4309 13646 04/30/98 008694 JONATHAN A. SCHWARTZ WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 001-2110 13647 04/30/98 000118 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COU CITATION SUR CHARGE/FEB 98 13648 04/30/98 008510 SOUTH COAST FIRE EQUIPM PARTS FOR ENGINE PUMP 13649 04/30/98 000159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI STREET LIGHTING/MARCH 98 ELECTRIC BILLING/MARCH 98 ELECTRIC BILLING/MARCH 98 9 110-3302 715-2201-4311 105-2601-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4202-4303 PAGE 5 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 3,940.00 6,985.00 138.82 284.51 423.33 56.00 56.00 92.01 92.01 3,247.00 3,247.00, 138.56 86.06 19.85 244.47 1,600.00 1,600.00 248.00 248.00 48.50 48.50 24.61 24.61 5,445.89 5,445.89 1,600.00 1,600.00 3,659.00 3,659.00 2,068.75 2,068.75 62.13 128.12 190.25 1,600.00 1,600.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 759.92 759.92 997.69 997.69 1,600.00 1,600.00 15,897.00 15,897.00 285.03 285.03 7,750.76 6,829.90 1,591.82 VOUCHRE2 04/30/98 16:25 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • 13650 04/30/98 008004 SURF CITY SKATE ZONE 13651 04/30/98 000010 TCI EQUIPMENT 13652 04/30/98 000124 TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 13653 04/30/98 008700 DANIELLE VINDEZ 13654 04/30/98 003353 VISA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL BILLING/MARCH 98 ELECTRIC BILLING/MARCH 98 STREET LIGHTING/MARCH 98 ELECTRIC BILLING/MARCH 98 ELECTRIC BILLING/MARCH 98 ELECTRIC BILLING/MARCH 98 - ELECTRIC BILLING/MARCH 98 STREET LIGHTING/MAR 98 STREET LIGHTING/MARCH 98 ADDMISSION SPRING EXCURSION GO -4 REPAIRS/APRIL 98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN PLUMBING SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN PLUMBING SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN PLUMBING SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN ROOM RESERVATION REFUND EXPENSES/STRASER/APRIL 98 EXPENSES/3/16-4/13/98/BURRELL ORAL BOARD LUNCHES/3/19-04/01 13655 04/30/98 008699 W T P ASSET MANAGEMENT WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 13656 04/30/98 008693 WESTEC BUSINESS SECURIT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 13657 04/30/98 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 SD ACCOUNT NUMBER 105-2601-4303 160-3102-4303 105-2601-4303 001-3104-4303 105-2601-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4202-4303 105-2601-4303 105-2601-4303 001-4601-4201 715-3302-4311 160-3102-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-4202-4309 001-2021 001-2022 160-3102-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-4202-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-2111 001-2101-4317 001-1101-4317 001-1203-4201 001-2110 001-3115 001-1206-4305 715-2201-4311 001-1203-4317 110-1204-4305 160-3102-4309 001-4202-4317 001-4101-4317 001-2101-4309 001-2101-4305 001-2201-4305 001-2101-4317 001-2101-4187 001-2101-4312 001-4204-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 31.99 34.03 148.19 780.96 15.61 12.65 248.52 66.01 108.00 165.00 317.89 316.19 6.45 6.45- 70.09 1.43 1.43- 44.64 .91 .91- 166.60 3.40 3.40- 175.00 35.98 127.21 37.85 1,600.00 63.00 181.91 52.00 28.74 49.83 20.84 22.00 10.00 18.97 13.00 13.00 3.00 20.51 18.00 25.97 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 17,618.44 165.00 317.89 597.52 175.00 201.04 1,600.00 63.00 VOUCHRE2 04/30/98 16:25 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT/4/98 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1101-4305 001-4601-4305 001-4601-4308 001-1203-4201 715-3104-4311 ITEM AMOUNT 3.66 14.69 229.08 14.21 12.70 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 752.11 TOTAL CHECKS 103,423.20 J1 VOUCHRE2 04/30/98 16:25 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 110 PARKING FUND 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 160 SEWER FUND 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND TOTAL 63,523.73 8,892.26 18,723.16 86.06 248.00 1,084.57 9,575.70 1,289.72 103,423.20 la PAGE 8 VOUCHRE2 05/05/98 07:56 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 13659 05/05/98 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 001-1103 332,260.24 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 105-1103 8,026.24 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 109-1103 819.07 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 110-1103 44,965.60 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 117-1103 700.52 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 126-1103 132.74 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 140-1103 69.09 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 145-1103 1,212.70 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 152-1103 56.44 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 160-1103 11,868.00 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 705-1103 2,526.48 PAYROLL/4-16 TO 4-30-98 715-1103 3,303.76 405,940.88 TOTAL CHECKS 405,940.88 3 • S VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 05/05/98 07:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 332,260.24 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 8,026.24 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 819.07 110 PARKING FUND 44,965.60 117 AB939 FUND 700.52 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 132.74 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 69.09 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,212.70 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 56.44 160 SEWER FUND 11,868.00 705 INSURANCE FUND 2,526.48 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,303.76 TOTAL 405,940.88 iu PAGE 2 VOUCHRE2 05/05/98 07:56 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY TtIAT THE D,%4ANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED�9 PAGES / TO T INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR Vi'l°,"s"LCr/9'r ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. FINANCE IRECTOR BY DATE PAGE 3 • May 7, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Thursday Mali 8$ 1998 Proposed agreement with State Lands Commission concerning oil project City Manager Pier Project Subcommittee Report City Manager Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of May 19, 1998 Community Development Director Public Hearing: 635 & 705 PCH -- CUP, PDP & VTTM #52508 for an 8 -unit condo; GPA & zone change Community Development Director Public Hearing: 840 15th St. — Council reconsideration/appeal of 2 unit condo Community Development Director f 16i1PAB Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of May 20, 1998 Community Resources Director rsd ST AB (If needed) BUDGET WORKSHOP une. Award of bid for 2 sewer pumps/motors at 35th Street & Strand Public Works Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Conunission meeting of June 16, 1998 Adoption of 1998-98 Budget Community Development Director Finance Director Review delinquent refuse bills for the purpose of ordering said delinquent charges be placed on the property tax bill as a special assessment. City Manager ...::.::......:.::. ...... �u�8:. X995 ........: Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of June 17, 1998 Community Resources Director May 6, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 12, 1998 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS MARCH 1998 Attached are the March 1998 Revenue and Expenditure Status Reports. General Fund revenue is 70.6% received for 75% of the fiscal year. After adjusting for property taxes receivable, revenue would be 75% received. Parking Fund revenue is 73.5% received. General Fund expenditures are 68.2% expended and Parking Fund expenditures are 73.4% expended for 75% of the fiscal year. NOTED: Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager Respectfully submitted, etic'642cs4-a-� Viki Copeland Finance Director h:\b95\open\revexp. doc REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 1 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 2,979,534.00 .00 1,690,325.91 1,289,208.09 56.7 3102 CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 216,664.00 14,813.97 213,571.61 3,092.39 98.6 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 89,000.00 9,692.20 145,096.02 56,096.02- 163.0 3106 SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813 18,030.00 2,655.05 17,988.48 41.52 99.8 3107 TRANSFER TAX 100,862.00 11,047.99 89,419.44 11,442.56 88.7 3108 SALES TAX 1,841,602.00 211,803.41 1,392,125.80 449,476.20 75.6 3109 1/2 CENT SALES TX EXT 136,293.00 15,483.98 73,424.15 62,868.85 53.9 3110 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 155,000.00 .00 81,666.01 73,333.99 52.7' 3111 ELECTRIC FRANCHISE 48,644.00 .00 .00 48,644.00 0.0 3112 GAS FRANCHISE 33,000.00 .00 .00 33,000.00 0.0 3113 REFUSE FRANCHISE 165,000.00 .00 80,185.25 84,814.75 48.6 3114 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 410,000.00 .00 307,375.35 102,624.65 75.0 3115 BUSINESS LICENSE 525,000.00 53,936.86 366,139.68 158,860.32 69.7 3120 UTILITY USER TAX 1,984,487.00 216,008.75 1,428,452.12 556,034.88 72.0 TAXES 8,703,116.00 535,442.21 5,885,769.82 2,817,346.18 67.6 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS 3202 DOG LICENSES 13,000.00 370.00 12,509.60 490.40 96.2 3203 BICYCLE LICENSES 100.00 42.00 76.60 23.40 76.6 3204 BUILDING PERMITS 340,341.00 15,089.08 229,794.67 110,546.33 67.5 3205 ELECTRIC PERMITS 25,000.00 2,971.79 26,139.70 1,139.70- 104.6 3206 PLUMBING PERMITS 24,000.00 1,562.00 21,600.60 2,399.40 90.0 3207 OCCUPANCY PERMITS 7,550.00 1,080.00 6,852.60 697.40 90.8 3209 GARAGE SALES 130.00 9.20 54.00 76.00 41.5 3211 BANNER PERMITS 4,120.00 412.00 3,079.15 1,040.85 74.7 3212 ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 167.00 .00 223.10 56.10- 133.6 3213 ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 2,671.00 334.00 2,256.50 414.50 84.5 3214 AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 600.00 78.00 310.80 289.20 51.8 3215 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT 726.00 178.00- 155.00 571.00 21.3 3216 SPRAY BOOTH PERMIT 119.00 .00 119.00 .00 100.0 3217 OPEN'FIRE PERMIT 565.00 .00 238.00 327.00 42.1 3218 AUTO REPAIR PERMIT 1,984.00 64.00 2,176.00 192.00- 109.7 LICENSES AND PERMITS 421,073.00 21,834.07 305,585.32 115,487.68 72.6 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 120,000.00 22,894.50 106,497.23 13,502.77 88.7 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 163,980.00 7,164.51 110,103.40 53,876.60 67.1 3402 RENTS & CONCESSIONS 2,267.00 72.89 1,598.05 668.95 70.5 3403 PIER REVENUE 500.00 22.40 423.10 76.90 84.6 3404 COMM CTR LEASES 98,075.00 8,235.00 73,490.00 24,585.00 74.9 3405 COMM CTR RENTALS 44,000.00 970.00 28,218.50 15,781.50 64.1 3406 COMM CTR THEATRE 35,000.00 5,247.00 36,537.20 1,537.20- 104.4 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 2 BALANCE % COL 3411 OTHER FACILITIES 38,000.00 1,671.00 18,277.00 19,723.00 48.1 3412 TENNIS COURTS 11,000.00 951.00 6,871.50 4,128.50 62.5 3418 SPECIAL EVENTS 64,000.00 2,456.00 51,735.09 12,264.91 80.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 2,486.00 .00 1,426.57 1,059.43 57.4 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 459,308.00 26,789.80 328,680.41 130,627.59 71.6 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 300.00 .00 294.18 5.82 98.1 3505 IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 728,559.00 63,086.30 582,026.75 146,532.25 79.9 3507 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 9,800.00 .00 2,015.49 7,784.51 20.6; 3508 MANDATED COSTS 12,859.00 .00 27,294.00 14,435.00- 212.3 3509 HOMEOWNR PROP TX RELIEF 60,459.00 .00 30,906.47 29,552.53 51.1 3510 POST 16,000.00 .00 11,026.08 4,973.92 68.9 3511 STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 3,410.00 .00 4,045.00 635.00- 118.6 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 831,387.00 63,086.30 657,607.97 173,779.03 79.1 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3801 RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 12,440.00 2,565.00 13,530.60 1,090.60- 108.8 3802 SIGN REVIEW 2,200.00 623.00 2,129.70 70.30 96.8 3803 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1,974.00 329.00 1,645.00 329.00 83.3 3805 CONDTL USE PERMIT AMEND 3,520.00 357.00 2,484.40 1,035.60 70.6 3806 BOARD OF APPEALS .00 .00 .00 .00 3808 ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW 5,090.00 1,031.00 4,098.50 991.50 80.5 3809 TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00 3810 FINAL MAP REVIEW 1,485.00 502.00 2,259.00 774.00- 152.1 3811 ZONE CHANGE/GEN PLAN AMEND 2,676.00 .00 2,676.00 .00 100.0 3812 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 25,440.00 4,350.00 24,756.55 683.45 97.3 3813 PLAN CHECK FEES 272,200.00 9,104.00 144,219.45 127,980.55 53.0 3814 PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL 360.00 .00 .00 360.00 0.0 3815 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 9,918.00 420.00 8,004.01 1,913.99 80.7 3818 POLICE SERVICES 3,000.00 806.00 2,754.70 245.30 91.8 3819 JAIL SERVICES 6,000.00 2,363.00 14,725.00 8,725.00- 245.4 3821 FINGERPRINT SERVICE 6,000.00 728.00 4,799.01 1,200.99 80.0 3823 SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 40,000.00 2,623.00 31,335.75 8,664.25 78.3 3824 VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES 10.00 .00 45.00 35.00- 450.0 3825 PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 32.00 .00 .00 32.00 0.0 3827 LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 6,287.00 .00 6,287.00 .00 100.0 3831 STREET CUT INSPECTION 15,000.00 7,710.00 22,089.55 7,089.55- 147.3 3833 RECREATION SERVICE CHARGES 4,548.00 693.50 2,112.16 2,435.84 46.4 3834 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 22,000.00 14,231.50 42,477.45 20,477.45- 193.1 3837 RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 1,200.00 30.00 470.00 730.00 39.2 3838 SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIONS 150.00 16.50 116.00 34.00 77.3 3839 PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 500.00 89.80 650.62 150.62- 130.1 3840 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 95,000.00 9,614.77 73,215.13 21,784.87 77.1 3841 POLICE TOWING 25,000.00 1,599.00 18,526.80 6,473.20 74.1 3857 PKG PLAN APPLICATION 4,104.00 .00 4,104.00 .00 100.0 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 3 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3858 TENANT REFUSE BILLING 210.00 .00 65.50 144.50 31.2 3859 REFUSE LIEN FEE 1,100.00 .00 6,925.46 5,825.46- 629.6 3862 ALARM PERMIT FEE 2,000.00 198.00 1,782.00 218.00 89.1 3863 FALSE ALARM FEE 1,000.00 .00 110.10 889.90 11.0 3864 C.U.P./FENCES/WALLS 210.00 .00 .00 210.00 0.0 3866 NONCONFORMING REMODELS 7,380.00 1,494.00 5,219.75 2,160.25 70.7 3867 PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS 31,925.00 5,108.00 33,185.75 1,260.75- 103.9 3868 PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT 27,867.00 4,438.00 24,351.00 3,516.00 87.4 3869 2ND PARTY RESPONSE 300.00 .00 .00 300.00 0.0 3878 COMML BLDG/APT INSPECT 583.00 195.00 970.20 387.20- 166.4, 3881 ROLLR HOCKEY RINK RENT INS .00 135.00 765.00 765.00- *** 3882 SPEC EVENT SECURITY/FIRE 3,000.00 .00 2,334.61 665.39 77.8 3883 FINAL/TENT MAP EXTNSION .00 .00 .00 .00 3884 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 567.00 .00 .00 567.00 0.0 3888 PLANNING COMM APPEALS 1,472.00 .00 1,104.00 368.00 75.0 3890 300'RADIUS NOTCG/APL CC 646.00 109.50 305.25 340.75 47.3 3893 CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 155,000.00 22,552.00 142,030.67 12,969.33 91.6 3894 OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS 45,000.00 675.00 22,007.50 22,992.50 48.9 3896 MAILING FEE 50.00 .00 50.20 .20- 100.4 3897 ADMIN FEE, INS CERTIF 159.00 .00 796.00 637.00- 500.6 3899 C.U.P. MINOR AMEND. 305.00 .00 .00 305.00 0.0 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 844,908.00 94,690.57 671,514.37 173,393.63 79.5 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 17,000.00 .00 14,890.00 2,110.00 87.6 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 1,904.00 507.00 1,072.78 831.22 56.3 3903 CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 11,378.00 1,250.00 17,113.56 5,735.56- 150.4 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 784.00 248.00 4,488.58 3,704.58- 572.5 3909 LATE FEE .00 .00 5.31 5.31- *** 3920 BCHD HEALTHY CITIES FUND 16,870.00 .00 16,869.83 .17 100.0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1,221,690.00 106,099.17 921,392.53 300,297.47 75.4 OTHER REVENUE 1,269,626.00 108,104.17 975,832.59 293,793.41 76.9 REVENUE CONTROL 12,649,418.00 872,841.62 8,931,487.71 3,717,930.29 70.6 GENERAL FUND 12,649,418.00 872,841.62 8,931,487.71 3,717,930.29 70.6 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 3105 ASSESSMENT REBATES TAXES 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB-PREVIOUS YEARS REVENUE CONTROL LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND PAGE 4 BALANCE % COL 449,318.00 .00 272,690.47 176,627.53 60.7 10,872.00 274.25- 23,391.93 12,519.93- 215.2 5,682.00- 393.76- 1,961.23- 3,720.77- 34.5 454,508.00 668.01- 294,121.17 160,386.83 64.7 50,563.00 1,438.98 23,542.52 27,020.48 46.6 522.00 .00 303.67 218.33 58.2, 51,085.00 1,438.98 23,846.19 27,238.81 46.7 .00 .00 45.00- 45.00 *** 505,593.00 770.97 317,922.36 187,670.64 62.9 505,593.00 770.97 317,922.36 187,670.64 62.9 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 5 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 49,495.00 690.39 9,657.29 39,837.71 19.5 3413 PARKING LOT LEASE 278,728.00 17,538.84 174,952.06 103,775.94 62.8 3420 OTHER INTEREST INCOME 19,199.00 1,595.37 14,415.17 4,783.83 75.1 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 220.00 .00 118.50 101.50 53.9 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 347,642.00 19,824.60 199,143.02 148,498.98 57.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 60,744.00 60,743.28 60,743.28 .72 100.0' REVENUE CONTROL 408,386.00 80,567.88 259,886.30 148,499.70 63.6 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 408,386.00 80,567.88 259,886.30 148,499.70 63.6 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 110 PARKING FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3300 3302 FINES & FORFEITURES COURT FINES/PARKING PAGE 6 BALANCE % COL 927,650.00 90,848.00 674,949.10 252,700.90 72.8 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 13,711.00 149.08 2,995.63 10,715.37 21.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 25.00 .00 90.99 65.99- 364.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 13,736.00 149.08 3,086.62 10,649.38 22.5 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3842 PARKING METERS 720,347.00 61,585.07 522,997.78 197,349.22 72.6 3843 PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL 230,000.00 93,136.00 189,760.00 40,240.00 82.5 3844 DAILY PARKING PERMITS 700.00 18.00 563.75 136.25 80.5 3848 DRIVEWAY PERMITS 500.00 96.00 352.80 147.20 70.6 3849 GUEST PERMITS 1,400.00 43.00 1,047.10 352.90 74.8 3850 CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS 2,000.00 616.00 2,201.30 201.30- 110.1 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 954,947.00 155,494.07 716,922.73 238,024.27 75.1 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN REVENUE CONTROL PARKING FUND 30,780.00 .00 20,520.00 10,260.00 66.7 1,927,113.00 246,491.15 1,415,478.45 511,634.55 73.5 1,927,113.00 246,491.15 1,415,478.45 511,634.55 73.5 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 7 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3,539.00 118.31 2,683.59 855.41 75.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 54.00 .00 32.32 21.68 59.9 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3,593.00 118.31 2,715.91 877.09 75.6 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 72,041.00 11,751.14 55,976.77 16,064.23 77.7 3502 SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 154,606.00 22,228.41 115,904.84 38,701.16 75.0 3503 SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION 4,000.00 .00 4,000.00 .00 100.0' 3512 SECTION 2105 (PROP 111) 110,341.00 17,826.85 85,112.75 25,228.25 77.1 3522 TDA ARTICLE 3/LOCAL 7,716.00 .00 .00 7,716.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 348,704.00 51,806.40 260,994.36 87,709.64 74.8 REVENUE CONTROL 352,297.00 51,924.71 263,710.27 88,586.73 74.9 STATE GAS TAX FUND 352,297.00 51,924.71 263,710.27 88,586.73 74.9 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 117 AB939 FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) • PAGE 8 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 6,813.00 371.24 6,014.83 798.17 88.3 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 137.00 .00 74.45 62.55 54.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 6,950.00 371.24 6,089.28 860.72 87.6 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3860 AB939 SURCHARGE 61,621.00 .00 , 30,076.97 31,544.03 48.8 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS .00 .00 624.00 624.00- *** REVENUE CONTROL 68,571.00 371.24 36,790.25 31,780.75 53.7 AB939 FUND 68,571.00 371.24 36,790.25 31,780.75 53.7 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 9 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 4,908.00 173.50 3,003.78 1,904.22 61.2 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 70.00 .00 39.63 30.37 56.6 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 4,978.00 173.50 3,043.41 1,934.59 61.1 REVENUE CONTROL 4,978.00 173.50 3,043.41 1,934.59 61.1 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 4,978.00 173.50 3,043.41 1,934.59 61.1 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 10 BALANCE % COL 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3606 LA CO PRKS/PIER RENOVATION 1,000,000.00 14,257.00 20,703.03 979,296.97 2.1 3608 MAINTENANCE ALLOCATION 17,164.00 .00 .00 17,164.00 0.0 3610 CO. LIFEGUARD AGREEMENT 500,000.00 .00 .00 500,000.00 0.0 3611 PROP A DISCRETIONARY FUNDS .00 .00 .00 .00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 1,517,164.00 14,257.00 20,703.03 1,496,460.97 1.4 REVENUE CONTROL 1,517,164.00 14,257.00 20,703.03 1,496,460.97 1.4 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 1,517,164.00 14,257.00 20,703.03 1,496,460.97 1.4 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3116 PARK REC FACILITY TAX 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910 PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU REVENUE CONTROL PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND PAGE 11 BALANCE % COL 49,000.00 .00 10,500.00 38,500.00 21.4 5,304.00 548.68 8,380.21 3,076.21- 158.0 201.00 .00 94.87 106.13 47.2 5,505.00 548.68 8,475.08. 2,970.08- 154.0 207,920.00 .00 75,544.00 132,376.00 36.3 262,425.00 548.68 94,519.08 167,905.92 36.0 262,425.00 548.68 94,519.08 167,905.92 36.0 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 12 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 102,356.00 3,357.94 58,557.57 43,798.43 57.2 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 1,358.00 .00 779.17 578.83 57.4 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 103,714.00 3,357.94 59,336.74 44,377.26 57.2 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR .00 .00 1.02 1.02- *** REVENUE CONTROL 103,714.00 3,357.94 59,337.76 44,376.24 57.2; 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 103,714.00 3,357.94 59,337.76 44,376.24 57.2 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 13 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 10,194.00 331.32 5,754.44 4,439.56 56.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 133.00 .00 77.04 55.96 57.9 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 10,327.00 331.32 5,831.48 4,495.52 56.5 REVENUE CONTROL 10,327.00 331.32 5,831.48 4,495.52 56.5 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 10,327.00 331.32 5,831.48 4,495.52 56.5 • REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 14 BALANCE % COL 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3720 AMER DISAB ACT 385,529.00 .00 12,634.00 372,895.00 3.3 REVENUE CONTROL 385,529.00 .00 12,634.00 372,895.00 3.3 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 385,529.00 .00 12,634.00 372,895.00 3.3 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 15 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3117 PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 210,720.00 17,871.00 139,940.00 70,780.00 66.4 3121 SUBREGIONAL INCENTIVES 27,025.00 .00 7,125.17 19,899.83 26.4 TAXES 237,745.00 17,871.00 147,065.17 90,679.83 61.9 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 5,354.00 239.50 4,524.75 829.25 84.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 111.00 .00 57.50 53.50 51.8 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 5,465.00 239.50 4,582.25 882.75 83.8' 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3854 FARES, DIAL A RIDE 11,500.00 .00 6,736.65 4,763.35 58.6 3855 BUS PASSES 1,200.00 130.40 935.20 264.80 77.9 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 12,700.00 130.40 7,671.85 5,028.15 60.4 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3916 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 10,000.00 .00 .00 10,000.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL PROPOSITION 'A FUND 265,910.00 18,240.90 159,319.27 106,590.73 59.9 265,910.00 18,240.90 159,319.27 106,590.73 59.9 • REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 16 05/06/98 08:38:34 REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3118 PROP C LOCAL RETURN FDS 175,714.00 16,182.00 113,525.00 62,189.00 64.6 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 20,530.00 1,235.55 19,144.45 1,385.55 93.3 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 442.00 .00 232.15 209.85 52.5 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 20,972.00 1,235.55 19,376.60 1,595.40 92.4 REVENUE CONTROL PROPOSITION 'C FUND 196,686.00 17,417.55 196,686.00 17,417.55 132,901.60 63,784.40 67.6' 132,901.60 63,784.40 67.6 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 150 GRANTS FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 17 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3545 COASTAL CONSERVANCY GRANT .00 .00 .00 .00 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3725 F.E.M.A. PIER REPAIR 90,000.00 .00 .00 90,000.00 0.0 3730 STPL LOWER PIER PROJ .00 .00 60,743.28 60,743.28- *** INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 90,000.00 .00 60,743.28 29,256.72 67.5 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3847 PARKING STRUCTURE EASEMENT 1,100,000.00 .00 .00 1,100,000.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 1,190,000.00 .00 60,743.28 1,129,256.72 5.1 GRANTS FUND 1,190,000.00 .00 60,743.28 1,129,256.72 5.1 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 18 05/06/98 08:38:34 REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 151 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3517 SPEED ENF/EDUCATION PROG 2,589.00 .00 2,589.22 .22- 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 2,589.00 .00 2,589.22 .22- 100.0 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND 2,589.00 .00 2,589.22 .22- 100.0 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 19 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 1,320.00 23.54 448.58 871.42 34.0 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 11.00 .00 7.34 3.66 66.7 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 1,331.00 23.54 455.92 875.08 34.3 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3538 AQMD EMISSION CTL AB276 20,500.00 4,507.81 9,679.18 10,820.82 47.2 REVENUE CONTROL 21,831.00 4,531.35 10,135.10 11,695.90 46.4 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 21,831.00 4,531.35 10,135.10 11,695.90 46.4 • • REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 20 05/06/98 08:38:34 REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.07. OF BUDGET YEAR) 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3135 C.O.P.S. ALLOCATION 43,470.00 .00 43,469.83 .17 100.0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 2,304.00 79.52 1,736.89 567.11 75.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 44.00 .00 15.52 28.48 35.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,348.00 79.52 1,752.41 595.59 74.6 REVENUE CONTROL 45,818.00 79.52 45,222.24 595.76 98.7' SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 45,818.00 79.52 45,222.24 595.76 98.7 • • REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 21 05/06/98 08:38:34 REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 4,059.00 .00 4,234.70 175.70- 104.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 34.00 9.68 116.76 82.76- 343.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 4.00 .00 .50 3.50 12.5 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 38.00 9.68 117.26 79.26- 308.6 REVENUE CONTROL 4,097.00 9.68 4,351.96 254.96- 106.2' CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 4,097.00 9.68 4,351.96 254.96- 106.2 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 160 SEWER FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 22 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 182,361.00 4,029.89 68,701.05 113,659.95 37.7 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 1,613.00 .00 919.30 693.70 57.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 183,974.00 4,029.89 69,620.35 114,353.65 37.8 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANCE 10,000.00 .00 6,375.62 3,624.38 63.8 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 SEWER CONNECTION FEE 35,556.00 .00 39,269.17 3,713.17- 110.4 3829 SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 500.00 1,169.00 2,004.00 1,504.00- 400.8 3832 SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 2,100.00 501.00 2,325.80 225.80- 110.8 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 38,156.00 1,670.00 43,598.97 5,442.97- 114.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 800,000.00 66,666.67 600,000.03 199,999.97 75.0 REVENUE CONTROL 1,032,130.00 72,366.56 719,594.97 312,535.03 69.7 SEWER FUND 1,032,130.00 72,366.56 719,594.97 312,535.03 69.7 • • REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 23 05/06/98 08:38:34 REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3304 FORFEITED FUNDS 7,000.00 .00 6,924.42 75.58 98.9 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 18,046.00 355.04 6,184.02 11,861.98 34.3 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 143.00 .00 83.31 59.69 58.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 18,189.00 355.04 6,267.33 11,921.67 34.5 REVENUE CONTROL 25,189.00 355.04 13,191.75 11,997.25 52.4' ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 25,189.00 355.04 13,191.75 11,997.25 52.4 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) • ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 24 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 9,278.00 499.51 8,153.88 1,124.12 87.9 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 192.00 .00 98.25 93.75 51.2 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 9,470.00 499.51 8,252.13 1,217.87 87.1 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3912 FIRE FLOW FEE 110,000.00 2,770.00 99,161.00 10,839.00 90.1 REVENUE CONTROL 119,470.00 3,269.51 107,413.13 12,056.87 89.9 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 119,470.00 3,269.51 107,413.13 12,056.87 89.9 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) • PAGE 25 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00 129.00 8,331.70 3,331.70- 166.6 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 361.00 .00 .00 361.00 0.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 5,361.00 129.00 8,331.70 2,970.70- 155.4 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3936 CONTRIB FROM PROPERTY OWNERS 400,000.00 .00 400,000.00 .00 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 405,361.00 129.00 408,331.70 2,970.70- 100.7, LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 405,361.00 129.00 408,331.70 2,970.70- 100.7 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 705 INSURANCE FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3880 INSURANCE SERVICE CHARGES 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR REVENUE CONTROL INSURANCE FUND PAGE 26 BALANCE % COL 1,007,098.00 83,924.00 755,316.00 251,782.00 75.0 .00 975.50 81,860.97 81,860.97- *** 1,007,098.00 84,899.50 837,176.97 169,921.03 83.1 1,007,098.00 84,899.50 837,176.97 169,921.03 83.1' • REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 27 05/06/98 08:38:34 REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3889 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 486,942.00 40,579.00 365,211.00 121,731.00 75.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3920 BCHD HEALTHY CITIES FUND 63,849.00 .00 63,849.48 .48- 100.0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 27,950.00 3,816.67 22,050.03 5,899.97 78.9 OTHER REVENUE 91,799.00 3,816.67 85,899.51 5,899.49 93.6 REVENUE CONTROL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 578,741.00 44,395.67 451,110.51 127,630.49 77.9' 578,741.00 44,395.67 451,110.51 127,630.49 77.9 REVPRIN2 05/06/98 08:38:34 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 28 BALANCE % COL REVENUE CONTROL 23,090,435.00 1,517,330.29 14,373,425.80 8,717,009.20 62.2 GRAND TOTALS 23,090,435.00 1,517,330.29 14,373,425.80 8,717,009.20 62.2 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 1 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1101 CITY COUNCIL 1101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 22,682.00 1,890.01 17,010.11 .00 5,671.89 75.0 1101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,069.00 .00 132.81 .00 1,936.19 6.4 1101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 26,750.00 5,000.00 17,000.00 .00 9,750.00 63.6 1101-4180 RETIREMENT 4,608.00 384.02 3,456.45 .00 1,151.55 75.0 1101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 26,963.00 2,348.06 20,691.13 .00 6,271.87 76.7 1101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 813.00 162.07 706.48 .00 106.52 86.9' PERSONAL SERVICES 83,885.00 9,784.16 58,996.98 .00 24,888.02 70.3 1101-4200 .CONTRACT SERVICES 1101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,000.00 .00 1,019.10 .00 19.10- 101.9 1101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1101-4304 TELEPHONE 400.00 .04 216.73 .00 183.27 54.2 1101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5,000.00 448.89 3,861.34 .00 1,138.66 77.2 1101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 7,000.00 .00 6,811.00 .00 189.00 97.3 1101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 6,320.00 .00 4,618.74 .00 1,701.26 73.1 1101-4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 3,035.00 .00 2,181.14 .00 853.86 71.9 1101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 56,420.00 4,702.00 42,318.00 .00 14,102.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 78,175.00 5,150.93 60,006.95 .00 18,168.05 76.8 CITY COUNCIL 163,060.00 14,935.09 120,023.03 .00 43,036.97 73.6 1121 CITY CLERK 1121-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1121-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 42,270.00 3,523.00 30,788.57 .00 11,481.43 72.8 1121-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,406.00 .00 .00 .00 1,406.00 0.0 1121-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 31,484.00 2,601.50 25,862.16 .00 5,621.84 82.1 1121-4180 RETIREMENT 7,606.00 695.54 6,138.49 .00 1,467.51 80.7 1121-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,350.00 463.67 4,090.67 .00 1,259.33 76.5 1121-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 943.00 88.80 821.40 .00 121.60 87.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 89,059.00 7,372.51 67,701.29 .00 21,357.71 76.0 1121-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1121-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 12,657.00 361.91 1,980.61 .00 10,676.39 15.6 1121-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 50,000.00 .00 .00 .00 50,000.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 62,657.00 361.91 1,980.61 .00 60,676.39 3.2 1121-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1121-4304 TELEPHONE 750.00 6.86 439.38 .00 310.62 58.6 1121-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,700.00 101.19 2,487.28 .00 2,212.72 52.9 1121-4315 MEMBERSHIP 325.00 .00 270.00 .00 55.00 83.1 1121-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 2,300.00 .00 .00 .00 2,300.00 0.0 1121-4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 10,500.00 1,588.03 4,376.46 .00 6,123.54 41.7 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) r PAGE 2 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1121-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 3,061.00 255.00 2,295.00 .00 766.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 21,636.00 1,951.08 9,868.12 .00 11,767.88 45.6 1121-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1121-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 2,556.00 .00 .00 .00 2,556.00 0.0 CITY CLERK 175,908.00 9,685.50 79,550.02 .00 96,357.98 45.2 1131 CITY ATTORNEY 1131-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1131-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 219,815.00 2,959.03- 129,335.60 .00 90,479.40 58.8' 1131-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1131-4304 TELEPHONE 285.00 .15 197.39 .00 87.61 69.3 1131-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 100.00 3.00 82.01 .00 17.99 82.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 385.00 3.15 279.40 .00 105.60 72.6 CITY ATTORNEY 220,200.00 2,955.88- 129,615.00 .00 90,585.00 58.9 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR 1132-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1132-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,550.00 220.52 1,944.48 .00 605.52 76.3 1132-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1132-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 77,540.00 9,006.25 53,925.46 200.00 23,414.54 69.8 1132-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1132-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 .80 194.98 .00 105.02 65.0 1132-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 520.00 95.44 476.57 .00 43.43 91.6 1132-4315 MEMBERSHIP 100.00 .00 50.00 .00 50.00 50.0 1132-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 400.00 .00 100.00 .00 300.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,320.00 96.24 821.55 .00 498.45 62.2 CITY PROSECUTOR 81,410.00 9,323.01 56,691.49 200.00 24,518.51 69.9 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1141-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 15,671.00 1,514.10 11,129.35 .00 4,541.65 71.0 1141-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 946.00 .00 .00 .00 946.00 0.0 1141-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 16,463.00 1,325.50 11,929.50 .00 4,533.50 72.5 1141-4180 RETIREMENT 4,268.00 352.92 2,866.14 .00 1,401.86 67.2 1141-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,279.00 543.87 4,617.43 .00 1,661.57 73.5 1141-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 498.00 41.18 334.77 .00 163.23 67.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 44,125.00 3,777.57 30,877.19 .00 13,247.81 70.0 1141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 9,171.00 208.33 6,431.07 .00 2,739.93 70.1 1141-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 3 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1141-4304 TELEPHONE 650.00 16.65 516.91 .00 133.09 79.5 1141-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,320.00 60.88 1,051.56 .00 268.44 79.7 1141-4315 MEMBERSHIP 75.00 100.00 100.00 .00 25.00- 133.3 1141-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,393.00 1,071.10 1,669.50 .00 276.50- 119.8 1141-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 2,071.00 173.00 1,557.00 .00 514.00 75.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5,509.00 1,421.63 4,894.97 .00 614.03 88.9 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 694.00 .00 390.62 .00 303.38 56.3 CITY TREASURER 59,499.00 5,407.53 42,593.85 .00 16,905.15 71.6• 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1201 CITY MANAGER 1201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 134,142.00 10,956.90 98,448.98 .00 35,693.02 73.4 1201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,123.00 .00 114.22 .00 6,008.78 1.9 1201-4180 RETIREMENT 15,977.00 1,222.97 11,005.67 .00 4,971.33 68.9 1201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,470.00 1,091.24 9,621.81 .00 4,848.19 66.5 1201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,832.00 149.51 1,358.15 .00 473.85 74.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 172,544.00 13,420.62 120,548.83 .00 51,995.17 69.9 1201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 600.00 .00 177.57 .00 422.43 29.6 1201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1201-4304 TELEPHONE 1,000.00 19.56 596.13 .00 403.87 59.6 1201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,500.00 41.87 835.17 .00 664.83 55.7 1201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,275.00 .00 60.00 .00 1,215.00 4.7 1201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,700.00 .00 4,289.07 .00 589.07- 115.9 1201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 6,361.00 530.00 4,770.00 .00 1,591.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 13,836.00 591.43 10,550.37 .00 3,285.63 76.3 1201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 0.0 CITY MANAGER 187,480.00 14,012.05 . 131,276.77 .00 56,203.23 70.0 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 245,333.00 19,790.41 173,271.92 .00 72,061.08 70.6 1202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 2,950.00 .00 361.52 .00 2,588.48 12.3 1202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 15,015.00 .00 18,021.16 .00 3,006.16- 120.0 1202-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 2,696.00 .00 2,695.30 .00 .70 100.0 1202-4180 RETIREMENT 30,738.00 2,422.61 21,514.30 .00 9,223.70 70.0 1202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21,654.00 1,898.64 15,975.98 .00 5,678.02 73.8 1202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,249.00 142.05 1,166.44 .00 82.56 93.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 319,635.00 24,253.71 233,006.62 .00 86,628.38 72.9 1202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 4 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE 7. USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1202-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 97,954.00 442.65 76,691.15 17,500.00 3,762.85 96.2 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4304 TELEPHONE 2,200.00 63.23 1,751.38 .00 448.62 79.6 1202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 7,711.00 513.66 6,562.67 .00 1,148.33 85.1 1202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00 25.00 320.00 .00 20.00- 106.7 1202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,856.00 568.72- 1,765.44 50.00 2,040.56 47.1 1202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 4,017.00 335.00 3,015.00 .00 1,002.00 75.1 1202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 12,186.00 1,015.00 9,135.00 .00 3,051.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 30,270.00 1,383.17 22,549.49 50.00 7,670.51 74.7' FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 447,859.00 26,079.53 332,247.26 17,550.00 98,061.74 78.1 1203 PERSONNEL 1203-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1203-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 47,361.00 4,701.52 30,848.06 .00 16,512.94 65.1 1203-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,026.00 .00 .00 .00 4,026.00 0.0 1203-4180 RETIREMENT 5,750.00 562.60 3,722.31 .00 2,027.69 64.7 1203-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,335.00 1,184.35 14,287.23 .00 47.77 99.7 1203-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 313.00 44.44 225.16 .00 87.84 71.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 71,785.00 6,492.91 49,082.76 .00 22,702.24 68.4 1203-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1203-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 31,445.00 3,930.78 35,590.25 .00 4,145.25- 113.2 1203-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 32,445.00 3,930.78 35,590.25 .00 3,145.25- 109.7 1203-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1203-4304 TELEPHONE 1,200.00 25.05 817.44 .00 382.56 68.1 1203-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,000.00 279.39 2,217.58 .00 1,782.42 55.4 1203-4315 MEMBERSHIP 920.00 .00 471.00 .00 449.00 51.2 1203-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 10,857.00 555.38 2,531.09 .00 8,325.91 23.3 1203-4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 24,880.00 525.00 12,940.50 .00 11,939.50 52.0 1203-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 5,549.00 462.00 4,158.00 .00 1,391.00 74.9 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 47,406.00 1,846.82 23,135.61 .00 24,270.39 48.8 PERSONNEL 151,636.00 12,270.51 107,808.62 .00 43,827.38 71.1 1206 DATA PROCESSING 1206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 39,744.00 3,428.00 30,852.00 .00 8,892.00 77.6 1206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 1206-4180 RETIREMENT 4,940.00 426.04 3,834.72 .00 1,105.28 77.6 1206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,018.00 174.41 1,538.39 .00 479.61 76.2 1206-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 576.00 49.70 447.32 .00 128.68 77.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 47,278.00 4,078.15 36,672.43 .00 10,605.57 77.6 1206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 5 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 38,847.00 389.45 23,073.66 .00 15,773.34 59.4 1206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1206-4304 TELEPHONE 5,400.00 191.70 1,911.74 .00 3,488.26 35.4 1206-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,400.00 460.23 2,447.73 .00 1,952.27 55.6 1206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2,000.00 97.39 1,506.83 .00 493.17 75.3 1206-4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00 .00 80.00 .00 220.00 26.7 1206-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 1206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,920.00 160.00 1,440.00 .00 480.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 15,020.00 909.32 7,386.30 .00 7,633.70 49.2' 1206-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1206-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 4,800.00 .00 3,890.51 .00 909.49 81.1 1206-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 27,600.00 4,361.40 9,173.11 .00 18,426.89 33.2 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 32,400.00 4,361.40 13,063.62 .00 19,336.38 40.3 DATA PROCESSING 133,545.00 9,738.32 80,196.01 .00 53,348.99 60.1 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 1208-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1208-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 39,975.00 3,330.80 29,977.20 .00 9,997.80 75.0 1208-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 375.00 .00 .00 .00 375.00 0.0 1208-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,404.00 .00 2,286.72 .00 117.28 95.1 1208-4180 RETIREMENT 4,968.00 413.96 3,726.17 .00 1,241.83 75.0 1208-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,269.00 196.80 1,734.23 .00 534.77 76.4 1208-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 580.00 48.30 467.81 .00 112.19 80.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 50,571.00 3,989.86 38,192.13 .00 12,378.87 75.5 1208-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1208-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 13,934.00 .00 10,511.00 .00 3,423.00 75.4 1208-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1208-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 2,242.82- 2,141.92- .00 2,441.92 714.0- 1208-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 29,537.00- 2,027.42- 25,127.23- 44.38 4,454.15- 84.9 1208-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,826.00 152.00 1,368.00 .00 458.00 74.9 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 27,411.00- 4,118.24- 25,901.15- 44.38 1,554.23- 94.3 1208-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 1208-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 10,115.00 .00 6,720.10 .00 3,394.90 66.4 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 47,209.00 128.38- 29,522.08 44.38 17,642.54 62.6 1214 PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES 1214-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1214-4322 UNCLASSIFIED 146,362.00 .00 .00 .00 146,362.00 0.0 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 6 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1299-4399 BUDGET TRANSFERS OUT 835,130.00 68,516.67 624,870.03 .00 210,259.97 74.8 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE 2101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 2,627,247.00 206,907.70 1,854,219.77 .00 773,027.23 70.6 2101-4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 37,803.00 2,969.02 26,859.98 .00 10,943.02 71.1 2101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 230,514.00 18,595.36 171,680.27 .00 58,833.73 74.5 2101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 269,663.00 25,895.90 211,025.43 .00 58,637.57 78.3 2101-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 34,200.00 2,754.22 25,420.23 .00 8,779.77 74.3: 2101-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 8,200.00 453.88 4,537.66 .00 3,662.34 55.3 2101-4118 TRAINING OFFICER 12,651.00 80.88 6,539.27 .00 6,111.73 51.7 2101-4180 RETIREMENT 657,079.00 55,490.40 496,988.65 .00 160,090.35 75.6 2101-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 52,500.00 2,041.86 33,509.93 .00 18,990.07 63.8 2101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 207,696.00 16,210.44 143,674.85 .00 64,021.15 69.2 2101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 24,038.00 2,178.00 18,912.88 .00 5,125.12 78.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 4,161,591.00 333,577.66 2,993,368.92 .00 1,168,222.08 71.9 2101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 82,835.00 2,629.15 62,251.28 515.23 20,068.49 75.8 2101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 3,000.00 152.00 733.74 .00 2,266.26 24.5 CONTRACT SERVICES 85,835.00 2,781.15 62,985.02 515.23 22,334.75 74.0 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2101-4304 TELEPHONE 39,000.00 3,522.50 35,290.90 .00 3,709.10 90.5 2101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 31,564.00 2,535.42 23,263.43 286.13 8,014.44 74.6 2101-4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 6,117.00 335.49 4,911.68 464.54 740.78 87.9 2101-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 2,126.00 163.27 2,592.78 .00 466.78- 122.0 2101-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,600.00 936.17 3,823.45 .00 776.55 83.1 2101-4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 20,000.00 3,023.01 19,676.46 .00 323.54 98.4 2101-4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 3,300.00 .00 139.52- .00 3,439.52 4.2- 2101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,235.00 45.00 369.10 .00 865.90 29.9 2101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 13,516.00 30.00 7,811.30 .00 5,704.70 57.8 2101-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 239,406.00 19,950.00 179,550.00 .00 59,856.00 75.0 2101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 400,581.00 33,382.00 300,438.00 .00 100,143.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 761,445.00 63,922.86 577,587.58 750.67 183,106.75 76.0 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 819.00 .00 634.81 .00 184.19 77.5 2101-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 1,504.00 .00 1,503.44 .00 .56 100.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2,323.00 .00 2,138.25 .00 184.75 92.0 POLICE 5,011,194.00 400,281.67 3,636,079.77 1,265.90 1,373,848.33 72.6 2102 CROSSING GUARD 2102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE 2201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 51,445.00 8,058.63 31,816.04 19,628.96 .00 100.0 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 7 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE Y USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,159,477.00 98,670.80 877,980.90 .00 281,496.10 75.7 2201-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 190,571.00 19,846.29 136,177.26 .00 54,393.74 71.5 2201-4108 FLSA OVERTIME 77,745.00 7,869.01 55,408.38 .00 22,336.62 71.3 2201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 119,183.00 8,750.73 59,180.48 .00 60,002.52 49.7 2201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 25,964.00 1,128.36 8,819.98 .00 17,144.02 34.0 2201-4119 FITNESS INCENTIVE 9,200.00 .00 4,800.00 .00 4,400.00 52.2 2201-4180 RETIREMENT 244,745.00 22,958.65 195,860.56 .00 48,884.44 80.0 2201-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 17,060.00 1,193.11 14,346.89 1,356.66 1,356.45 92.0 2201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 146,528.00 12,319.59 109,185.63 .00 37,342.37 74.5 2201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 12,774.00 1,123.72 9,196.57 .00 3,577.43 72.0' PERSONAL SERVICES 2,003,247.00 173,860.26 1,470,956.65 1,356.66 530,933.69 73.5 2201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,484.00 2,436.93- 16,006.32 .00 4,477.68 78.1 2201-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2,343.00 .00 2,343.13 .00 .13- 100.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 22,827.00 2,436.93- 18,349.45 .00 4,477.55 80.4 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2201-4304 TELEPHONE 7,224.00 184.42 4,725.63 .00 2,498.37 65.4 2201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,600.00 79.76 3,697.60 .00 902.40 80.4 2201-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12,484.00 369.93 10,088.68 .00 2,395.32 80.8 2201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 2,175.00 310.85 2,227.85 .00 52.85- 102.4 2201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 9,200.00 170.00 6,033.18 .00 3,166.82 65.6 2201-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 48,489.00 4,041.00 36,369.00 .00 12,120.00 75.0 2201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 140,668.00 11,722.00 105,498.00 .00 35,170.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 224,840.00 16,877.96 168,639.94 .00 56,200.06 75.0 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2201-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 1,516.00 .00 1,577.21 .00 61.21- 104.0 FIRE 2,252,430.00 188,301.29 1,659,523.25 1,356.66 591,550.09 73.7 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3104 STREET MAINT/TRAFFIC SAFETY 3104-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3104-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 130,076.00 9,904.37 93,442.38 .00 36,633.62 71.8 3104-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,050.00 17.60 690.34 .00 359.66 65.7 3104-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 5,144.00 .00 5,732.18 .00 588.18- 111.4 3104-4180 RETIREMENT 16,240.00 1,230.64 11,609.76 .00 4,630.24 71.5 3104-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,523.00 1,287.38 10,705.54 .00 3,817.46 73.7 3104-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 294.00 21.88 152.45 .00 141.55 51.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 167,327.00 12,461.87 122,332.65 .00 44,994.35 73.1 3104-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3104-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 134,800.00 12,438.26 93,527.02 .00 41,272.98 69.4 3104-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 560.00 .00 413.00 .00 147.00 73.8 CONTRACT SERVICES 135,360.00 12,438.26 93,940.02 .00 41,419.98 69.4 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.07. OF BUDGET YEAR) • PAGE 8 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3104-4303 UTILITIES 6,910.00 .00 5,965.98 .00 944.02 86.3 3104-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 36,000.00 2,325.21 26,796.68 625.71 8,577.61 76.2 3104-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 17,358.00 1,447.00 13,023.00 .00 4,335.00 75.0 3104-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 66,756.00 5,563.00 50,067.00 .00 16,689.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 127,024.00 9,335.21 95,852.66 625.71 30,545.63 76.0 3104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3104-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 7,000.00 .00 1,659.47 .00 5,340.53 23.7 STREET MAINT/TRAFFIC SAFETY 436,711.00 34,235.34 313,784.80 625.71 122,300.49 72.0 4100 PLANNING 4101 PLANNING 4101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 147,348.00 11,938.99 114,975.63 .00 32,372.37 78.0 4101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 9,234.00 .00 1,148.61 .00 8,085.39 12.4 4101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 18,230.00 1,889.55 10,427.35 .00 7,802.65 57.2 4101-4180 RETIREMENT 21,403.00 1,747.88 16,408.59 .00 4,994.41 76.7 4101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 13,093.00 1,142.10 9,905.51 .00 3,187.49 75.7 4101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 3,176.00 259.48 2,003.34 .00 1,172.66 63.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 212,484.00 16,978.00 154,869.03 .00 57,614.97 72.9 4101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 30,325.00 2,504.50 23,036.86 .00 7,288.14 76.0 4101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4101-4304 TELEPHONE 2,100.00 14.23 1,223.21 .00 876.79 58.2 4101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10,599.00 253.04 6,206.99 .00 4,392.01 58.6 4101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 900.00 519.00 679.00 .00 221.00 75.4 4101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,500.00 20.50 202.00 .00 3,298.00 5.8 4101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 12,581.00 1,048.00 9,432.00 .00 3,149.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 29,680.00 1,854.77 17,743.20 .00 11,936.80 59.8 4101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 4,277.00 .00 4,257.83 .00 19.17 99.6 PLANNING 276,766.00 21,337.27 199,906.92 .00 76,859.08 72.2 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 BUILDING 4201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 138,740.00 8,302.02 91,657.02 .00 47,082.98 66.1 4201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 8,643.00 .00 1,400.74 .00 7,242.26 16.2 4201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 18,230.00 1,889.55 10,427.30 .00 7,802.70 57.2 4201-4180 RETIREMENT 16,982.00 1,028.36 11,284.51 .00 5,697.49 66.4 4201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 12,337.00 782.03 7,685.68 .00 4,651.32 62.3 4201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 3,337.00 242.30 2,042.24 .00 1,294.76 61.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 198,269.00 12,244.26 124,497.49 .00 73,771.51 62.8 4201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 9 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 344,073.00 15,552.25 108,649.32 .00 235,423.68 31.6 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4304 TELEPHONE 3,830.00 91.33 2,143.20 .00 1,686.80 56.0 4201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5,000.00 514.28- 4,100.31 .00 899.69 82.0 4201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,200.00 .00 470.00 .00 730.00 39.2 4201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 7,400.00 111.47 1,182.51 .00 6,217.49 16.0 4201-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 9,414.00 784.00 7,056.00 .00 2,358.00 75.0 4201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 11,997.00 1,000.00 9,000.00 .00 2,997.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 38,841.00 1,472.52 23,952.02 .00 14,888.98 61.7' 4201-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 4201-5602 IMPRVMNTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 BUILDING 582,183.00 29,269.03 257,098.83 .00 325,084.17 44.2 4202 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 4202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 197,819.00 16,865.09 146,718.51 .00 51,100.49 74.2 4202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 .00 1,079.65 .00 579.65- 215.9 4202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,712.00 .00 4,261.05 .00 549.05- 114.8 4202-4180 RETIREMENT 24,944.00 2,095.76 18,089.37 .00 6,854.63 72.5 4202-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 5,300.00 361.24 3,295.88 .00 2,004.12 62.2 4202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 23,396.00 2,010.19 16,878.46 .00 6,517.54 72.1 4202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,096.00 170.74 1,512.58 .00 583.42 72.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 257,767.00 21,503.02 191,835.50 .00 65,931.50 74.4 4202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4202-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 127,748.00 8,483.53 73,391.03 1,950.00 52,406.97 59.0 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4303 UTILITIES 95,715.00 2,654.68 51,107.71 .00 44,607.29 53.4 4202-4304 TELEPHONE 8,197.00 970.13 7,276.66 .00 920.34 88.8 4202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10,735.00 1,176.73 6,673.55 157.55 3,903.90 63.6 4202-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 19,653.00 1,508.38 16,778.43 .00 2,874.57 85.4 4202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 500.00 .00 527.00 .00 27.00- 105.4 4202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 8,400.00 121.00 2,231.66 .00 6,168.34 26.6 4202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 24,839.00 2,070.00 18,630.00 .00 6,209.00 75.0 4202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 89,992.00 7,499.00 67,491.00 .00 22,501.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 258,031.00 15,999.92 170,716.01 157.55 87,157.44 66.2 4202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 2,000.00 .00 121.81 .00 1,878.19 6.1 4202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 14,699.00 .00 .00 .00 14,699.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 16,699.00 .00 121.81 .00 16,577.19 0.7 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 660,245.00 45,986.47 436,064.35 2,107.55 222,073.10 66.4 4204 4204-4100 BUILDING MAINTENANCE PERSONAL SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 10 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 81,973.00 6,927.36 61,191.65 .00 20,781.35 74.6 4204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,082.00 95.77 1,409.14 .00 327.14- 130.2 4204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 5,748.00 .00 1,272.14 .00 4,475.86 22.1 4204-4180 RETIREMENT 10,045.00 867.67 7,673.52 .00 2,371.48 76.4 4204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10,438.00 905.19 7,973.44 .00 2,464.56 76.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 109,286.00 8,795.99 79,519.89 .00 29,766.11 72.8 4204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4204-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 73,360.00 5,740.00 47,643.46 .00 25,716.54 64.9 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4303 UTILITIES 92,000.00 364.23 72,207.93 .00 19,792.07 78.5 4204-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 27,600.00 1,555.09 8,895.58 .00 18,704.42 32.2 4204-4321 BUILDING SFTY/SECURITY 2,850.00 598.48 1,769.61 425.00 655.39 77.0 4204-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 7,567.00 631.00 5,679.00 .00 1,888.00 75.0 4204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 33,641.00 2,803.00 25,227.00 .00 8,414.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 163,658.00 5,951.80 113,779.12 425.00 49,453.88 69.8 4204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4204-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 4,500.00 .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 0.0 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 350,804.00 20,487.79 240,942.47 425.00 109,436.53 68.8 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 174,849.00 13,430.22 130,686.59 .00 44,162.41 74.7 4601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 3,400.00 94.00 94.00 .00 3,306.00 2.8 4601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 11,918.00 .00 6,595.66 .00 5,322.34 55.3 4601-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 125,000.00 8,342.21 81,930.54 .00 43,069.46 65.5 4601-4180 RETIREMENT 25,124.00 2,006.00 19,185.48 .00 5,938.52 76.4 4601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,688.00 1,381.69 12,554.46 .00 2,133.54 85.5 4601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 5,971.00 354.17 3,698.61 .00 2,272.39 61.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 360,950.00 25,608.29 254,745.34 .00 106,204.66 70.6 4601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 11,566.00 244.42- 6,860.79 .00 4,705.21 59.3 4601-4221 CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 114,000.00 518.00 84,757.75 .00 29,242.25 74.3 CONTRACT SERVICES 125,566.00 273.58 91,618.54 .00 33,947.46 73.0 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4302 ADVERTISING 17,600.00 42.50 11,474.71 .00 6,125.29 65.2 4601-4304 TELEPHONE 4,000.00 237.00 2,837.07 .00 1,162.93 70.9 4601-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10,500.00 556.50 7,917.77 .00 2,582.23 75.4 4601-4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 18,020.00 .00 11,228.51 340.00 6,451.49 64.2 4601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 400.00 .00 315.54 .00 84.46 78.9 4601-4315 MEMBERSHIP 700.00 385.00 740.00 .00 40.00- 105.7 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 11 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4601-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,870.00 .00 1,930.54 .00 3,939.46 32.9 4601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 8,121.00 677.00 6,093.00 .00 2,028.00 75.0 4601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 21,655.00 1,805.00 16,245.00 .00 5,410.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 86,866.00 3,703.00 58,782.14 340.00 27,743.86 68.1 4601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4601-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 8,998.00 .00 4,276.72 .00 4,721.28 47.5 4601-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 4,834.00 .00 5,072.36 .00 238.36- 104.9 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 13,832.00 .00 9,349.08 .00 4,482.92 67.6 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 587,214.00 29,584.87 414,495.10 340.00 172,378.90 70.6; 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8608 PUB WORKS YARD RELOCATION 8608-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8608-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,200.00 .00 49.69 .00 5,150.31 1.0 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 279,163.00 .00 .00 .00 279,163.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 13,142,653.00 944,426.31 8,924,155.38 43,544.16 4,174,953.46 68.2 GENERAL FUND 13,142,653.00 944,426.31 8,924,155.38 43,544.16 4,174,953.46 68.2 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 12 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE V. USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 146.00 .00 81.67 .00 64.33 55.9 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 16,370.00 1,364.17 12,277.53 .00 4,092.47 75.0 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 LTNG/LANDSCAPING (MEDIANS) 2601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 170,276.00 13,545.28 120,737.07 .00 49,538.93 70.9 2601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,773.00 .00 477.86 .00 1,295.14 27.0 2601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,135.00 .00 3,880.11 .00 2,254.89 63.2 2601-4180 RETIREMENT 21,057.00 1,685.77 15,174.47 .00 5,882.53 72.1 2601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,067.00 1,297.09 10,822.67 .00 3,244.33 76.9 2601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,697.00 132.44 1,232.74 .00 464.26 72.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 215,005.00 16,660.58 152,324.92 .00 62,680.08 70.8 2601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 67,355.00 .00 54,140.93 .00 13,214.07 80.4 2601-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 20,500.00 666.44 7,391.02 .00 13,108.98 36.1 CONTRACT SERVICES 87,855.00 666.44 61,531.95 .00 26,323.05 70.0 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4303 UTILITIES 134,000.00 9,272.19 91,754.40 .00 42,245.60 68.5 2601-4304 TELEPHONE 250.00 .00 .00 .00 250.00 0.0 2601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 20,700.00 1,019.52 14,756.01 1,941.14 4,002.85 80.7 2601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 23,908.00 1,992.00 17,977.62 .00 5,930.38 75.2 2601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 26,042.00 2,170.00 19,530.00 .00 6,512.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 204,900.00 14,453.71 144,018.03 1,941.14 58,940.83 71.2 LTNG/LANDSCAPING (MEDIANS) 507,760.00 31,780.73 357,874.90 1,941.14 147,943.96 70.9 8100 STREET SAFETY 8153 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 14TH 8153-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8153-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8156 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 13TH 8156-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8156-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 5,000.00 .00 2,230.00 .00 2,770.00 44.6 5,000.00 .00 2,243.22 .00 2,756.78 44.9 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 13 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EXPENDITURE CONTROL 534,276.00 33,144.90 374,707.32 1,941.14 157,627.54 70.5 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 534,276.00 33,144.90 374,707.32 1,941.14 157,627.54 70.5 • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 14 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 61.00 .00 31.76 .00 29.24 52.1 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPL1ES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 8,955.00 4,662.92 8,466.28 .00 488.72 94.5' 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3301 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 3301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 20,228.00 1,365.31 13,218.90 .00 7,009.10 65.3 3301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 838.00 .00 140.07 .00 697.93 16.7 3301-4180 RETIREMENT 2,488.00 196.66 1,864.70 .00 623.30 74.9 3301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,665.00 135.23 1,196.72 .00 468.28 71.9 3301-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 297.00 23.40 223.83 .00 73.17 75.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 25,516.00 1,720.60 16,644.22 .00 8,871.78 65.2 3301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 69,677.00 3,178.01 34,099.08 .00 35,577.92 48.9 3301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3301-4302 ADVERTISING 14,773.00 .00 .00 .00 14,773.00 0.0 3301-4304 TELEPHONE 200.00 .00 66.60 .00 133.40 33.3 3301-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 700.00 .00 129.47 .00 570.53 18.5 3301-4331 DOWNTOWN BANNER PROGRAM .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 3301-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 910.00 76.00 684.00 .00 226.00 75.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 16,583.00 76.00 880.07 .00 15,702.93 5.3 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 111,776.00 4,974.61 51,623.37 .00 60,152.63 46.2 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 51,370.00 .00 51,614.70 748.95 993.65- 101.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 172,162.00 9,637.53 111,736.11 748.95 59,676.94 65.3 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 172,162.00 9,637.53 111,736.11 748.95 59,676.94 65.3 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 15 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 110 PARKING FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 7.00 .00 20.95 .00 13.95- 299.3 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1204 FINANCE CASHIER 1204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 160,088.00 14,158.91 118,370.85 .00 41,717.15 73.9% 1204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,000.00 3.96 8.65 .00 991.35 0.9 1204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,050.00 .00 2,733.17 .00 1,316.83 67.5 1204-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 13,116.00 .00 475.64 .00 12,640.36 3.6 1204-4180 RETIREMENT 22,797.00 1,761.24 14,804.63 .00 7,992.37 64.9 1204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21,178.00 1,595.82 12,308.85 .00 8,869.15 58.1 1204-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,618.00 129.73 1,039.18 .00 578.82 64.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 223,847.00 17,649.66 149,740.97 .00 74,106.03 66.9 1204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1204-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 25,349.00 169.94 15,139.63 60.00 10,149.37 60.0 1204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1204-4304 TELEPHONE 2,741.00 59.61 1,807.47 .00 933.53 65.9 1204-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 26,286.00 749.53 16,535.31 .00 9,750.69 62.9 1204-4315 MEMBERSHIP 155.00 .00 125.00 .00 30.00 80.6 1204-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,232.00 151.40 1,193.20 50.00 1,988.80 38.5 1204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 8,198.00 683.00 6,147.00 .00 2,051.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 40,612.00 1,643.54 25,807.98 50.00 14,754.02 63.7 1204-4900 DEPRECIATION 1204-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 90.00 .00 .00 .00 90.00 0.0 1204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1204-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 932.00 .00 .00 .00 932.00 0.0 1204-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 4,400.00 .00 .00 .00 4,400.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 5,332.00 .00 .00 .00 5,332.00 0.0 FINANCE CASHIER 295,230.00 19,463.14 190,688.58 110.00 104,431.42 64.6 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 794,224.00 66,185.33 595,667.97 .00 198,556.03 75.0 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3302-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 458,472.00 37,551.14 356,590.38 .00 101,881.62 77.8 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 110 PARKING FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) • PAGE 16 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3302-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 8,000.00 1,529.60 6,353.46 .00 1,646.54 79.4 3302-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 24,439.00 8,884.45 25,554.67 .00 1,115.67- 104.6 3302-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 43,003.00 676.00 14,922.51 .00 28,080.49 34.7 3302-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4,100.00 270.30 2,478.40 .00 1,621.60 60.4 3302-4180 RETIREMENT 67,950.00 5,829.62 56,536.85 .00 11,413.15 83.2 3302-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 4,600.00 290.00 2,669.69 .00 1,930.31 58.0 3302-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 42,426.00 3,599.35 32,702.83 .00 9,723.17 77.1 3302-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 7,763.00 240.66 2,656.16 .00 5,106.84 34.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 660,753.00 58,871.12 500,464.95 .00 160,288.05 75.7 3302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3302-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 7,200.00 705.00 4,661.24 .00 2,538.76 64.7 3302-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 3,500.00 188.31 1,709.84 .00 1,790.16 48.9 CONTRACT SERVICES 10,700.00 893.31 6,371.08 .00 4,328.92 59.5 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4304 TELEPHONE 4,000.00 123.14 2,375.37 .00 1,624.63 59.4 3302-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9,452.00 153.57 8,121.61 .00 1,330.39 85.9 3302-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1,600.00 .00 .00 855.17 744.83 53.4 3302-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 7,548.00 .00 4,232.97 .00 3,315.03 56.1 3302-4315 MEMBERSHIP 225.00 .00 .00 .00 225.00 0.0 3302-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 2,500.00 591.00 737.00 .00 1,763.00 29.5 3302-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 86,267.00 7,189.00 64,701.00 .00 21,566.00 75.0 3302-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 54,673.00 4,556.00 41,004.00 .00 13,669.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 166,265.00 12,612.71 121,171.95 855.17 44,237.88 73.4 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 1,047.00 .00 .00 .00 1,047.00 0.0 3302-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS 560.00 .00 .00 .00 560.00 0.0 3302-4904 DEPRECIATION/IMPROVMNTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** DEPRECIATION 1,607.00 .00 .00 .00 1,607.00 0.0 COMMUNITY SERVICES 839,325.00 72,377.14 628,007.98 855.17 210,461.85 74.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,928,786.00 158,025.61 1,414,385.48 965.17 513,435.35 73.4 PARKING FUND 1,928,786.00 158,025.61 1,414,385.48 965.17 513,435.35 73.4 i • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 17 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 15.00 .00 8.36 .00 6.64 55.7 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 340,988.00 28,415.67 255,741.03 .00 85,246.97 75.0' 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EXPENDITURE CONTROL 341,003.00 28,415.67 255,749.39 .00 .85,253.61 75.0 STATE GAS TAX FUND 341,003.00 28,415.67 255,749.39 .00 85,253.61 75.0 • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 18 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 117 AB939 FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 38.00 .00 20.44 .00 17.56 53.8 5300 AB939 5301 SRCE REDCTN/RECYCLE ELEMENT 5301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 5301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 14,834.00 1,209.35 11,122.95 .00 3,711.05 75.0' 5301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN .00 .00 130.65 .00 130.65- *** 5301-4180 RETIREMENT 1,771.00 144.06 1,326.99 .00 444.01 74.9 5301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,491.00 122.48 1,088.35 .00 402.65 73.0 5301-4189 FICA 217.00 17.70 165.62 .00 51.38 76.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 18,313.00 1,493.59 13,834.56 .00 4,478.44 75.5 5301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 5301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 40,000.00 .00 200.00 .00 39,800.00 0.5 5301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5301-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 SRCE REDCTN/RECYCLE ELEMENT 59,813.00 1,493.59 14,034.56 .00 45,778.44 23.5 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 59,851.00 1,493.59 14,055.00 .00 45,796.00 23.5 AB939 FUND 59,851.00 1,493.59 14,055.00 .00 45,796.00 23.5 . • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 19 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 19.00 .00 10.66 .00 8.34 56.1 8100 STREET SAFETY 8141 STREET REHAB 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 60,779.00 .00 .00 .00 60,779.00 0.0' EXPENDITURE CONTROL 60,798.00 .00 10.66 .00 60,787.34 0.0 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 60,798.00 .00 10.66 .00 60,787.34 0.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 20 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 17,164.00 1,430.33 12,872.97 .00 4,291.03 75.0 8500 PARKS 8506 PARK & BEACH IMPROVEMENTS 8506-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8506-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ***' 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,000,000.00 23,117.20 43,148.46 72,797.80 884,053.74 11.6 8624 DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C 8624-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8624-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 500,000.00 83,162.02 225,277.16 173,955.80 100,767.04 79.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,517,164.00 107,709.55 281,298.59 246,753.60 989,111.81 34.8 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 1,517,164.00 107,709.55 281,298.59 246,753.60 989,111.81 34.8 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 21 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 56.00 .00 26.52 .00 29.48 47.4 8500 PARKS 8515 SO SCHOOL PARK 8515-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8515-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8523 NOBLE PARK 8523-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8523-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 4,237.00 .00 4,097.55 .00 139.45 96.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 4,293.00 .00 4,124.07 .00 168.93 96.1 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 4,293.00 .00 4,124.07 .00 168.93 96.1 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 22 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 379.00 .00 209.03 .00 169.97 55.2 8500 PARKS 8506 PARK & BEACH IMPROVEMENTS 8506-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8506-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 138,667.00 .00 15,715.42 7,267.50 115,684.08 16.6' 8508 PARK IRRIGATION 8508-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8508-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY .00 320.00 2,395.00 .00 2,395.00- *** 8508-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8508-4189 FICA .00 24.49 183.23 .00 183.23- *** PERSONAL SERVICES .00 344.49 2,578.23 .00 2,578.23- *** 8508-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8508-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 460,000.00 .00 9,138.69 6,494.11 444,367.20 3.4 PARK IRRIGATION 460,000.00 344.49 11,716.92 6,494.11 441,788.97 4.0 8514 ATSF R -R -O -W PURCHASE 8514-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8514-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 273.00 .00 272.69 .00 .31 99.9 8515 SO SCHOOL PARK 8515-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8515-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8525 COMM CTR SKATE BOARD TRACK 8525-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8525-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 241,260.00 .00 .00 .00 241,260.00 0.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EXPENDITURE CONTROL 840,579.00 344.49 27,914.06 13,761.61 798,903.33 5.0 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 840,579.00 344.49 27,914.06 13,761.61 798,903.33 5.0 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 23 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 37.00 .00 20.66 .00 16.34 55.8 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 133,799.00 .00 5,976.00 12,382.50 115,440.50 13.7' EXPENDITURE CONTROL 133,836.00 .00 5,996.66 12,382.50 115,456.84 13.7 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 133,836.00 .00 5,996.66 12,382.50 115,456.84 13.7 S • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 24 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 94,303.00 .00 12,323.17 .00 81,979.83 13.1 8623 COMMUNITY CENTER REMODEL 8623-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8623-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 148,632.00 .00 .00 .00 148,632.00 0.0 8626 ADA COMP/PARKS/COMM SERV/STRTS 8626-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8626-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 5,436.00 274.00 2,351.19 .00 3,084.81 43.3 8626-4180 RETIREMENT 674.00 40.06 356.28 .00 317.72 52.9 8626-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 724.00 24.11 233.93 .00 490.07 32.3 8626-4189 FICA 79.00 .00 5.42 .00 73.58 6.9 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,913.00 338.17 2,946.82 .00 3,966.18 42.6 8626-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8626-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 135,681.00 .00 8.50 .00 135,672.50 0.0 ADA COMP/PARKS/COMM SERV/STRTS 142,594.00 338.17 2,955.32 .00 139,638.68 2.1 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 385,529.00 338.17 15,278.49 .00 370,250.51 4.0 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 385,529.00 338.17 15,278.49 .00 370,250.51 4.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 25 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 31.00 .00 15.55 .00 15.45 50.2 3400 PUBLIC TRANSIT 3401 DIAL A RIDE 3401-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3401-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 26,300.00 2,266.20 18,877.29 .00 7,422.71 71.8' 3401-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3401-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 229,576.00 .00 88,690.71 .00 140,885.29 38.6 3401-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3401-4304 TELEPHONE 50.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 0.0 3401-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 5.70 10.56 .00 489.44 2.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 550.00 5.70 10.56 .00 539.44 1.9 DIAL A RIDE 256,426.00 2,271.90 107,578.56 .00 148,847.44 42.0 3403 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 3403-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3403-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 750.00 64.94 372.08 .00 377.92 49.6 3403-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3403-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5,000.00 236.00 2,032.00 252.00 2,716.00 45.7 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 5,750.00 300.94 2,404.08 252.00 3,093.92 46.2 3408 COMMUTER XPRESS 3408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,600.00 136.52 1,145.76 .00 454.24 71.6 3408-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3408-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 10,600.00 .00 .00 .00 10,600.00 0.0 COMMUTER XPRESS 12,200.00 136.52 1,145.76 .00 11,054.24 9.4 3409 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 3409-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3409-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,800.00 129.78 1,411.10 .00 388.90 78.4 3409-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3409-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 12,000.00 .00 8,235.98 .00 3,764.02 458.6 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 13,800.00 129.78 9,647.08 .00 4,152.92 69.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 288,207.00 2,839.14 120,791.03 252.00 167,163.97 42.0 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 288,207.00 2,839.14 120,791.03 252.00 167,163.97 42.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 26 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 123.00 .00 63.72 .00 59.28 51.8 8100 STREET SAFETY 8150 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 16TH 8150-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8150-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 30,000.00 .00 .00 .00 30,000.00 0.0' EXPENDITURE CONTROL 30,123.00 .00 63.72 .00 30,059.28 0.2 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 30,123.00 .00 63.72 .00 30,059.28 0.2 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 27 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 150 GRANTS FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 60,744.00 60,743.28 60,743.28 .00 .72 100.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 90,000.00 .00 .00 .00 90,000.00 0.0' 8624 DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C 8624-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8624-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,100,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,100,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,250,744.00 60,743.28 60,743.28 .00 1,190,000.72 4.9 GRANTS FUND 1,250,744.00 60,743.28 60,743.28 .00 1,190,000.72 4.9 © . EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 28 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 151 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2100 POLICE 2104 SPEED ENFORCEMENT/EDUC PROGRAM 2104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2104-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 561.00 .00 1,860.70 .00 1,299.70- 331.7 2104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2104-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 738.00 .00 728.52 .00 9.48 98.7 2104-5402 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 2,249.00 .00 .00 .00 2,249.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2,987.00 .00 728.52 .00 2,258.48 24.4' SPEED ENFORCEMENT/EDUC PROGRAM 3,548.00 .00 2,589.22 .00 958.78 73.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 3,548.00 .00 2,589.22 .00 958.78 73.0 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND 3,548.00 .00 2,589.22 .00 958.78 73.0 S • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 29 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 3.00 .00 1.81 .00 1.19 60.3 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 23,600.00 1,966.67 17,700.03 .00 5,899.97 75.0' 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3701-4327 AQMD INCENTIVES 1,500.00 65.00 445.00 .00 1,055.00 29.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 25,103.00 2,031.67 18,146.84 .00 6,956.16 72.3 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 25,103.00 2,031.67 18,146.84 .00 6,956.16 72.3 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 30 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 12.00 .00 4.42 .00 7.58 36.8 2100 POLICE 2106 C.O.P.S. PROGRAM 2106-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2106-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,500.00 .00 3,000.00 .00 2,500.00 54.5' 2106-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2106-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES 2,600.00 753.28 1,876.00 753.28 29.28- 101.1 2106-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1,350.00 .00 148.87 .00 1,201.13 11.0 2106-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3,950.00 753.28 2,024.87 753.28 1,171.85 70.3 2106-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2106-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 6,890.00 177.53 238.15 .00 6,651.85 3.5 2106-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 20,597.00 864.92 6,014.92 8,240.00 6,342.08 69.2 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 27,487.00 1,042.45 6,253.07 8,240.00 12,993.93 52.7 2106-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 2106-5602 IMPRVMNTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 9,800.00 .00 .00 .00 9,800.00 0.0 C.O.P.S. PROGRAM 46,737.00 1,795.73 11,277.94 8,993.28 26,465.78 43.4 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 46,749.00 1,795.73 11,282.36 8,993.28 26,473.36 43.4 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 46,749.00 1,795.73 11,282.36 8,993.28 26,473.36 43.4 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 31 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM EXPENDITURE CONTROL CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 1.00 .00 .05 .00 .95 5.0 1.00 .00 .05 .00 .95 5.0 1.00 .00 .05 .00 .95 5.0 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 160 SEWER FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) • PAGE 32 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 450.00 .00 246.32 .00 203.68 54.7 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 3102-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3102-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 187,773.00 15,156.10 124,573.40 .00 63,199.60 66.3' 3102-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 5,993.00 238.22 5,683.60 .00 309.40 94.8 3102-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 5,245.00 .00 8,371.22 .00 3,126.22- 159.6 3102-4180 RETIREMENT 23,127.00 1,873.98 15,370.84 .00 7,756.16 66.5 3102-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 20,892.00 1,793.68 14,583.09 .00 6,308.91 69.8 3102-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,940.00 156.85 1,306.08 .00 633.92 67.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 244,970.00 19,218.83 169,888.23 .00 75,081.77 69.4 3102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 104,336.00 16,285.89 69,285.46 15,310.76 19,739.78 81.1 3102-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOV'T 3,400.00 .00 .00 .00 3,400.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 107,736.00 16,285.89 69,285.46 15,310.76 23,139.78 78.5 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4303 UTILITIES 1,035.00 .00 783.63 .00 251.37 75.7 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12,000.00 458.25 6,711.67 .00 5,288.33 55.9 3102-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 17,556.00 1,463.00 13,172.06 .00 4,383.94 75.0 3102-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 36,817.00 3,068.00 27,612.00 .00 9,205.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 67,408.00 4,989.25 48,279.36 .00 19,128.64 71.6 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 420,114.00 40,493.97 287,453.05 15,310.76 117,350.19 72.1 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 200,000.00 .00 1,844.41 .00 198,155.59 0.9 8160-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8160-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 .00 14.59 .00 14.59- *** DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 200,000.00 .00 1,859.00 .00 198,141.00 0.9 8300 STORM DRAIN 8301 MISC STORM DRAINS 8301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 80,000.00 2,039.46 2,239.46 .00 77,760.54 2.8 8302 NPDES IMPROVEMENTS 8302-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 160 SEWER FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 33 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8302-4102 REGULAR SALARIES .00 .00 1,135.87 .00 1,135.87- *** 8302-4180 RETIREMENT .00 .00 228.29 .00 228.29- *** 8302-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 46.19 .00 46.19- *** 8302-4189 FICA .00 .00 28.30 .00 28.30- *** PERSONAL SERVICES .00 .00 1,438.65 .00 1,438.65- *** 8302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8302-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 75,000.00 .00 14,800.50 15,444.50 44,755.00 40.3 NPDES IMPROVEMENTS 75,000.00 .00 16,239.15 15,444.50 43,316.35 42.2 8303 14TH STREET STORM DRAIN 8303-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8303-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 115,000.00 .00 .00 .00 115,000.00 0.0 8400 SANITARY SEWER 8408 SANITARY SEWER 8408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 51,480.00 4,440.00 41,734.50 .00 9,745.50 81.1 8408-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8408-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY .00 320.00 2,395.00 .00 2,395.00- *** 8408-4180 RETIREMENT 6,398.00 551.80 5,296.36 .00 1,101.64 82.8 8408-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,755.00 160.36 1,470.84 .00 284.16 83.8 8408-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 746.00 88.85 803.65 .00 57.65- 107.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 60,379.00 5,561.01 51,700.35 .00 8,678.65 85.6 8408-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8408-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 500,000.00 .00 229,497.19 7,200.00 263,302.81 47.3 8408-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8408-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 2,002.00 167.00 1,503.00 .00 499.00 75.1 SANITARY SEWER 562,381.00 5,728.01 282,700.54 7,200.00 272,480.46 51.5 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,452,945.00 48,261.44 590,737.52 37,955.26 824,252.22 43.3 SEWER FUND 1,452,945.00 48,261.44 590,737.52 37,955.26 824,252.22 43.3 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 34 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.07. OF BUDGET YEAR) 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 40.00 .00 22.03 .00 17.97 55.1 2100 POLICE 2103 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 2103-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2103-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 7,500.00 .00 835.69 .00 6,664.31 11.1' 2103-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2103-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 92,715.00 .00 549.37 .00 92,165.63 0.6 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 100,215.00 .00 1,385.06 .00 98,829.94 1.4 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 53,000.00 .00 .00 .00 53,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 153,255.00 .00 1,407.09 .00 151,847.91 0.9 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 153,255.00 .00 1,407.09 .00 151,847.91 0.9 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 35 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 54.00 .00 27.02 .00 26.98 50.0 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 48,489.00 4,040.75 36,366.75 .00 12,122.25 75.0' 2200 FIRE 2202 FIRE PROTECTION 2202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,800.00 .00 1,711.46 .00 88.54 95.1 2202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 26,099.00 .00 12,194.04 .00 13,904.96 46.7 FIRE PROTECTION 27,899.00 .00 13,905.50 .00 13,993.50 49.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 76,442.00 4,040.75 50,299.27 .00 26,142.73 65.8 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 76,442.00 4,040.75 50,299.27 .00 26,142.73 65.8 • • EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 36 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 103.00 .00 4.23 .00 98.77 4.1 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 400,000.00 .00 256,000.00 .00 144,000.00 64.0' EXPENDITURE CONTROL 400,103.00 .00 256,004.23 .00 144,098.77 64.0 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 400,103.00 .00 256,004.23 .00 144,098.77 64.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 37 05/06/98 08:34:10 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 306 LOMA/MYRTLE UNDRGRND DISTRICT ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8182 UTIL UNDRGRND/MYRTLE AVE 8182-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8182-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,000.00 .00 6,487.50 .00 13,512.50 32.4 8183 UTIL UNDRGRND/LOMA DR 8183-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8183-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,000.00 .00 6,487.50 .00 13,512.50 32.4 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 40,000.00 .00 12,975.00 .00 27,025.00 32.4 LOMA/MYRTLE UNDRGRND DISTRICT 40,000.00 .00 12,975.00 .00 27,025.00 32.4 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 705 INSURANCE FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 38 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1209 LIABILITY INSURANCE 1209-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1209-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 30,470.00 2,350.72 15,415.20 .00 15,054.80 50.6 1209-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,824.00 .00 .00 .00 1,824.00 0.0 1209-4180 RETIREMENT 3,656.00 281.20 1,861.40 .00 1,794.60 50.9 1209-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,129.00 254.34 1,655.65 .00 1,473.35 52.9 1209-4189 FICA .00 22.22 111.10 .00 111.10- *** PERSONAL SERVICES 39,079.00 2,908.48 19,043.35 .00 20,035.65 48.7' 1209-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1209-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 99,700.00 .00 56,231.00 .00 43,469.00 56.4 1209-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1209-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 14.77 137.30 .00 362.70 27.5 1209-4315 MEMBERSHIP 320.00 .00 270.00 .00 50.00 84.4 1209-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,000.00 .00 200.00 .00 800.00 20.0 1209-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 350,000.00 43,950.54 144,253.85 .00 205,746.15 41.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 351,820.00 43,965.31 144,861.15 .00 206,958.85 41.2 LIABILITY INSURANCE 490,599.00 46,873.79 220,135.50 .00 270,463.50 44.9 1210 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 1210-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1210-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 25,000.00 954.00 19,647.00 .00 5,353.00 78.6 1210-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1210-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 15,000.00 .00 .00 .00 15,000.00 0.0 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 40,000.00 954.00 19,647.00 .00 20,353.00 49.1 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT 1215-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1215-4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 27,000.00 .00 14,226.00 .00 12,774.00 52.7 1217 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1217-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1217-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 30,470.00 2,350.76 15,415.47 .00 15,054.53 50.6 1217-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,722.00 .00 .00 .00 1,722.00 0.0 1217-4180 RETIREMENT 3,656.00 281.32 1,861.68 .00 1,794.32 50.9 1217-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,129.00 254.42 1,656.18 .00 1,472.82 52.9 1217-4189 FICA .00 22.22 111.14 .00 111.14- *** PERSONAL SERVICES 38,977.00 2,908.72 19,044.47 .00 19,932.53 48.9 1217-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1217-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 49,900.00 41,504.45 67,820.45 .00 17,920.45- 135.9 1217-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 4,500.00 .00 4,442.29 .00 57.71 98.7 CONTRACT SERVICES 54,400.00 41,504.45 72,262.74 .00 17,862.74- 132.8 1217-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 705 INSURANCE FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 39 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE 7. USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1217-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 800.00 17.57 160.54 .00 639.46 20.1 1217-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 1,000.00 .00 162.70 .00 837.30 16.3 1217-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 350,000.00 151,291.78 468,078.28 .00 118,078.28- 133.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 351,800.00 151,309.35 468,401.52 .00 116,601.52- 133.1 WORKERS COMPENSATION 445,177.00 195,722.52 559,708.73 .00 114,531.73- 125.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,002,776.00 243,550.31 813,717.23 .00 189,058.77 81.1 INSURANCE FUND 1,002,776.00 243,550.31 813,717.23 .00 189,058.77 81.1 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 40 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 75.00 .00 9.40 .00 65.60 12.5 1202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 50.00 .00 12.70 .00 37.30 25.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 125.00 .00 22.10 .00 102.90 17.7 1202-4900 DEPRECIATION 1202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0' FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1,625.00 .00 22.10 .00 1,602.90 1.4 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS 1208-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1208-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 35,683.00 .00 35,682.46 .00 .54 100.0 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2101-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 28,735.00 1,751.82 19,633.01 .00 9,101.99 68.3 2101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 30,823.00 2,769.73- 25,901.28 1,589.61 3,332.11 89.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 59,558.00 1,017.91- 45,534.29 1,589.61 12,434.10 79.1 2101-4900 DEPRECIATION 2101-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 100,124.00 .00 .00 .00 100,124.00 0.0 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5403 VEHICLES 106,750.00 9,078.62 100,396.01 .00 6,353.99 94.0 POLICE 266,432.00 8,060.71 145,930.30 1,589.61 118,912.09 55.4 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 5,650.00 381.52 3,251.13 .00 2,398.87 57.5 2201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 6,000.00 3,222.28- 2,734.43 138.93 3,126.64 47.9 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 11,650.00 2,840.76- 5,985.56 138.93 5,525.51 52.6 2201-4900 DEPRECIATION 2201-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 33,650.00 .00 .00 .00 33,650.00 0.0 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2201-5403 VEHICLES 288,612.00 3,267.05 269,180.70 .00 19,431.30 93.3 FIRE 333,912.00 426.29 275,166.26 138.93 58,606.81 82.4 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 41 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 3,175.00 273.88 1,781.45 .00 1,393.55 56.1 2601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 3,300.00 199.32 3,185.29 378.57 263.86- 108.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6,475.00 473.20 4,966.74 378.57 1,129.69 82.6 2601-4900 DEPRECIATION 2601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 13,400.00 .00 .00 .00 13,400.00 0.0 2601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2601-5403 VEHICLES 25,000.00 .00 .00 .00 25,000.00 0.0 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 44,875.00 473.20 4,966.74 378.57 39,529.69 11.9: 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 8,510.00 .00 .00 .00 8,510.00 0.0 3102-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,075.00 164.80 1,505.38 .00 430.38- 140.0 3102-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,200.00 87.34 1,259.46 .00 59.46- 105.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 10,785.00 252.14 2,764.84 .00 8,020.16 25.6 3102-4900 DEPRECIATION 3102-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 9,700.00 .00 .00 .00 9,700.00 0.0 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 20,485.00 252.14 2,764.84 .00 17,720.16 13.5 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,825.00 259.53 1,904.59 .00 920.41 67.4 3104-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 3,500.00 194.71 1,189.43 .00 2,310.57 34.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6,325.00 454.24 3,094.02 .00 3,230.98 48.9 3104-4900 DEPRECIATION 3104-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 6,250.00 .00 .00 .00 6,250.00 0.0 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 12,575.00 454.24 3,094.02 .00 9,480.98 24.6 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 8,500.00 312.95 4,644.40 .00 3,855.60 54.6 3302-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 9,500.00 357.77- 8,173.49 108.25 1,218.26 87.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 18,000.00 44.82- 12,817.89 108.25 5,073.86 71.8 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 23,622.00 .00 .00 .00 23,622.00 0.0 3302-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3302-5403 VEHICLES 20,381.00 .00 20,381.00 .00 .00 100.0 COMMUNITY SERVICES 62,003.00 44.82- 33,198.89 108.25 28,695.86 53.7 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 42 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3701-5403 VEHICLES 61,600.00 .00 22,928.10 .00 38,671.90 37.2 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 625.00 38.49 431.84 .00 193.16 69.1 4201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,100.00 .00 836.82 .00 263.18 76.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,725.00 38.49 1,268.66 .00 456.34 73.5 4201-4900 DEPRECIATION 4201-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 4,500.00 .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 0.0 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 6,225.00 38.49 1,268.66 .00 4,956.34 20.4 4202 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,400.00 41.94 797.19 .00 602.81 56.9 4202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,500.00 307.16 2,102.05 .00 397.95 84.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3,900.00 349.10 2,899.24 .00 1,000.76 74.3 4202-4900 DEPRECIATION 4202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 9,500.00 .00 .00 .00 9,500.00 0.0 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 13,400.00 349.10 2,899.24 .00 10,500.76 21.6 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,150.00 46.26 698.13 .00 451.87 60.7 4204-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 800.00 .00 1,083.07 .00 283.07- 135.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,950.00 46.26 1,781.20 .00 168.80 91.3 4204-4900 DEPRECIATION 4204-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 834.00 .00 .00 .00 834.00 0.0 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,784.00 46.26 1,781.20 .00 1,002.80 64.0 4206 EQUIPMENT SERVICE 4206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 79,183.00 3,813.54 34,321.93 .00 44,861.07 43.3 4206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,676.00 .00 550.03 .00 1,125.97 32.8 4206-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY .00 2,197.00 18,365.75 .00 18,365.75- *** 4206-4180 RETIREMENT 9,841.00 578.40 4,616.04 .00 5,224.96 46.9 4206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,312.00 363.88 3,200.41 .00 5,111.59 38.5 4206-4189 FICA 485.00 31.86 976.19 .00 491.19- 201.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 99,497.00 6,984.68 62,030.35 .00 37,466.65 62.3 4206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 7,540.00 85.00 85.00 .00 7,455.00 1.1 4206-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 3,600.00 .00 271.36 .00 3,328.64 7.5 CONTRACT SERVICES 11,140.00 85.00 356.36 .00 10,783.64 3.2 4206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 43 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 6,500.00 422.78 1,573.75 .00 4,926.25 24.2 4206-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,995.00 59.20 1,076.72 .00 1,918.28 36.0 4206-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,903.00 83.11 617.94 .00 1,285.06 32.5 4206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 11,190.00 933.00 8,397.00 .00 2,793.00 75.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 22,588.00 1,498.09 11,665.41 .00 10,922.59 51.6 EQUIPMENT SERVICE 133,225.00 8,567.77 74,052.12 .00 59,172.88 55.6 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,155.00 62.42 595.64 .00 559.36 51.6 4601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 827.00 189.56 219.33 .00 607.67 26.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,982.00 251.98 814.97 .00 1,167.03 41.1 4601-4900 DEPRECIATION 4601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 2,950.00 .00 .00 .00 2,950.00 0.0 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4,932.00 251.98 814.97 .00 4,117.03 16.5 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 83,000.00 .00 .00 .00 83,000.00 0.0 8625 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS 8625-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8625-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 150,000.00 .00 .00 .00 150,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,232,756.00 18,875.36 604,569.90 2,215.36 625,970.74 49.2 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,232,756.00 18,875.36 604,569.90 2,215.36 625,970.74 49.2 EXPPRIN2 05/06/98 08:34:10 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT MARCH 1998 (075.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 44 ADJUSTED MARCH 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND EXPENDITURE CONTROL 25,123,682.00 1,665,673.50 13,972,737.95 369,513.03 10,781,431.02 57.1 GRAND TOTALS 25,123,682.00 1,665,673.50 13,972,737.95 369,513.03 10,781,431.02 57.1 • TREASURER'S REPORT - MARCH 1998 FUND GENERAL 3/1/98 3/31/98 NUMBER ACCOUNT BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENT CHECKS ADJUSTMENT BALANCE 001 GENERAL $3,144,164.18 $808,418.48 5122,511.49 (5718,563.84) ($249,862.46) $3,106,667.85 105 UGHTING/LANDSCAPING $650,912.02 ($274.25) 51,918.84 ($25,87328) (58,226.55) $618,456.78 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 5259,629.09 519,294.00 561,635.65 04,693.51) 05,148.41) $330,716.82 110 PARKING 515,631.84 5262,738.07 5171.88 (594,139.03) ($86,290.98) 598,111.78 115 STATE GAS TAX 543,701.96 551,806.40 5167.62 (528,464.98) 567,211.00 117 AB939 5164,978.16 5497.18 (51,272.54) (5342.32) 5163,860.48 119 COMP ABSENCES 5573,549.81 5573.549.81 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 578,499.59 5237.51 (564.01) 578,673.09 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE $304,520.40 514,257.00 0106,279.22) 01,430.33) 5211,067.85 125 PARK REC FAC TAX $242,328.78 $84.00 5733.56 0268.88) 5242,877.46 126 RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY 51,521,734.81 $4,605.05 ($238.41) ($1,293.98) 51,524,807.47 127 BUILDING IMPROVMENT FUND 5149,931.61 $453.72 (5122.40) 5150,262.93 140 COMM DEVELOP. BLOCK GRANT (52,263.10) ($192.43) ($23.48) (52,479.01) • 145 PROPOSITION A FUND 5105,36026 518,001.40 5341.78 02,607.06) 0349.87) 5120,746.51 146 PROPOSITION C FUND $534,172.94 516,182.00 51,64127 (5405.72) $551,590.49 150 GRANT FUND 5217,25325 060,74328) 5156,509.97 151 TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT FUND 50.00 50.00 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DISTRICT 59,782.43 54,507.81 $33.52 (538.55) (51,982.49) 512,302.72 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFOR SVC 540,539.48 5119.89 (51,795.73) ($40.37) 538,823.27 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 54,286.56 513.07 (53.39) $4,29624 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 51,811,592.65 51,670.00 572,178.87 (540,974.31) 09,551.53) 51,834,915.68 170 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 5160,73024 5486.39 0131.35) 5161,08528 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 5223,944.41 52,686.00 5759.88 ($4,217.12) 5223,173.17 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST I MPR FUND 5152,198.47 5460.53 (5331.53) 5152,327.47 306 LOMMAYRTLE UNDERGROUND DIST $27,025.00 527,025.00 705 INSURANCE FUND 51,508,944.31 5975.50 583,924.00 0242,432.87) (51,117.44) 51,350,293.50 715 EQUIP.REPLACEMENT FUND 51,160,100.43 544,539.52 (513,67427) (55,104.03) 51,185,861.65 900 INVESTMENT FUND (57,46528) 528,380.52 57,46528 028,410.46) ($29.94) 513,095,784.30 51,228,726.93 $404,896.50 (51,252,775.05) (5493,927.36) 512,982,705.32 TRUST BALANCE BALANCE ACCOUNTS 3/1/98 DEPOSITS CHARGES 3/31/98 PAYROLL $3,000.00 5716,984.12 5716,984.12 $3,000.00 BANK BALANCE CABLE TV DEPOSIT 510,000.00 510,000.00 GENERAL $407,383.39 TRUST ACCTS 516,828.91 512,687,342.63 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $355,527.66 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $424,212.30 OUTSTANDING CHECKS 5115,849.61 $308,362.69 INACTIVE DEPOSIT 512,687,342.63 BALANCE 512,995,705.32 MAY 6, 1998 Honorable Mayor City Council Meeting and Members of the City Council of MAY 12 1998 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of March 1998. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, J M. Workman City Treasurer NOTED: Stephen R. Bir eII City Manager NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland Finance Director INSTITUTION LAIF 3/1/98 3/31/98 CORPORATE NOTES: Investment • INVESTMENT REPORT - • MARCH 1998 DATE OF DATE OF ASKING MARKET TOTAL INVESTMENTS MATURITY PRICE VALUE INTEREST U.S. TREASURY BONDS/NOTES: $7,693,469.68 $1,000,000.00 $8,693,469.68 5.710% $501,165.23 12/11/97 9/15/00 $501,190.00 $503,305.00 6.210% Westmont $499,498.49 5/6/96 8/15/98 $498,164.06 $500,705.00 Investment $496,798.45 9/12/96 11/15/98 $492,031.25 $499,845.00 5.870% 5.500% U.S. GOVT AGENCY BONDS/NOTES Federal Home Loan Bank $497,427.14 10/17/96 2/22/99 $494,725.00 $499,060.00 5.580% Federal National Mtg Assn $500,000.00 6/3/97 6/3/99 $500,000.00 $503,140.00 6.270% Federal Home Loan Bank $499,167.09 8/1/97 7/28/00 $499,050.00 $500,935.00 6.080% U.S. GOVT AGCY -STATE TAX EXEMPT S.LA4A $500,000.00 12/30/96 12/30/98 $500.000.00 $500,470.00 Federal Home Loan Bk $499,816.55 3/19/97 2/12/99 $499,687.50 $501,795.00 INVESTMENT TOTAL $12,687,342.63 IIIISMIMMMIENLEM 5.730% 6.070% $3,984,847.81 $4,009,255.00 5.920% In compliance with the California Code Section 53646. the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, CITY TREASURER May 6, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members For the City Council Meeting of the City Council of May 12, 1998 ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council appropriate the following donation to the Public Works Administration/Parks department: Betty Benoit Memorial Fund - $850.00 Background: The City received a donation in the amount of $850.00 to be used for a Park Bench and plaque. R spectfully submitted: Valerie Mohler Accounting Supervisor h: user\valerie\donation. doc Concur: Viki Copeland Finance Director Stephen City Mana •. May 5, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 12, 1998 AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND DAILY INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE NORTH PIER PARKING STRUCTURE — CIP 96-624 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Harris & Associates, Inc. for Contract Administration and Inspection Services in the amount of $275,570. 2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue addenda as necessary within the budget limitation. Background: On April 8, 1998 the City Council awarded the architectural and engineering design services to Gordon Chong and Partners for the parking structure. On May 29, 1997 the City Council set up a committee to oversee the implementation of the proposed parking structure. Designs were developed during discussions and meetings with members of the City of Hermosa Beach parking structure design review committee and also reflect ideas presented by the City Council and participating residents at the City Council meeting of May 29, 1997. On August 12, 1997 the City Council approved design development concept presented by Gordon Chong and Partners and authorized the preparation of the plans and specifications for the parking structure. In March 1998, staff prepared and sent out ten Request For Proposals (RFP) for Construction Management Services pertaining to construction of the parking structure, in anticipation that the parking structure could go to construction in September. The RFP included requirements for biddibility and constructibility review and public relations in addition to the more standard construction management needs. Staff is in the opinion that review of the design by another consultant prior to bidding of the plans and specifications will assure the City of accuracy of the construction documents. Retaining the construction manager team before bidding of the project will allow minor design changes to be made which will save the City time and construction cost. 1f • • The management team will be responsible to study the impact that construction activities will have on neighboring businesses and residents. Newsletters, flyers and public meetings will keep the effected parties aware of construction progress and changes in scheduling through the construction period. ANALYSIS: The analysis is divided as follows: 1. The respondents 2. Interviews The Respondents Five respondents submitted proposals. All proposals are available for review in the City Clerk's office. A list of the respondent's costs are shown below: Respondent City Cost 1. Harris & Associates, Inc. Los Alamitos $275,570 2. Gordon Chong and Partners, Inc. San Francisco $315,079 3. Analytical Planning Services, Inc. Irvine $323,750 4. Vanir Construction Management, Inc. Los Angeles $359,018 5. Tec Management Consultants, Inc. Los Angeles $466,292 The Interviews The proposals were evaluated by a selection committee consisting of all City Department Directors and the Public Works Assistant Engineer. Three consultants were selected for the interview. The three respondents that made the short list were: 1. Harris & Associates 2. Gordon Chong and Partners 3. Analytical Planning Services Based on the interview, selection committee considered all three respondents interviewed to be qualified to do the work and provide the service required by the City. But among these three, Harris & Associates clearly demonstrated to be the most qualified Construction Management provider to best serve the City's need. A reference check revealed that Harris & Associates has an excellent reputation for working with previous clients. Their latest parking structure with the City of Huntington Beach was completed successfully without claims. The Department of Public Works, therefore recommends award of the Construction Management contract for the parking structure to Harris & Associates, Inc. in the amount of $275,570. • Fiscal Impact: Proposed Management Services Contract: $275,570 15% Contingency $41,335 $316,905 Hourly Rates for Additional Services if requested by the City would be as follows: Construction Manager $125 per hr. Inspector $ 75 per hr. Estimated fiscal impact on 121 and 150 Funds allocated for this project are: Respectfully submitted, �!e`L4 $316,905. Concur: Homa}Edun Behboodi arold C. Williams, P.E. Assistant Engineer Fiscal Impact: 41_ rait- Viki Copeland Finance Director Fb95.pwfiles.ccitems.pierpk2 Direct. o 'ublic Works/City Engineer 641 Stephen lbrrell City Ma .ger • • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Recommendation: May 5, 1998 Regular meeting of May 12, 1998 Municipal Pier Renovation - Construction Phasing It is recommended that City Council: 1. Break the Municipal Pier Renovation Project (CIP 95-620) into two projects; the Municipal Pier Structural Retrofit (CIP 95-620) and Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrades (CIP 98-621). 2. Approve amendment to the Pier Renovation design contract with Harding, Lawson Associates to break the project into two phases, and add $4,510 to the contract to cover these changes. 3. Allocate $2,550 in County Prop A Open Space Funds(121) to the Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrades Project (CIP 98-621) to cover the costs for architectural renderings. Background: The Hermosa Beach City Council, at it's March 25, 1997 meeting, approved design development drawings based upon a earlier preliminary design competition concept. Recently, changes to this concept are being reviewed in an effort to control costs and provide a more useful and meaningful improvement to the City. In order that no further time be lost it is suggested that the project be broken into two phases whereby the structural retrofit portion would be completed while the architectural design is finalized. Analysis: It is anticipated that construction of the structural retrofit could be complete by early 1999. The architectural upgrades could be designed, approved and bid out so that commencement of construction of those improvements would dove -tail with completion of the retrofit. Fiscal Impact: Breaking the Pier Retrofit portion of the plans and specifications out of the existing bid documents will add $4,510 to the City's contract with it's designer, Harding, Lawson & ig • • Associates. Costs for changes to the architectural portion of work cannot be addressed until the extent of these changes are determined. No additional appropriation is necessary as this contract change shall be covered by the 15% contingency approved by City Council for the original design contract. The preliminary budget estimate to complete the structural retrofit portion is $1,000,000. Therefore $1,000,000 (910,000 in the Prop A Open Space Fund 121 and 90,000 in the FEMA Grant Fund 150) should remain in CIP 95-620. The preliminary budget estimate for the Architectural Upgrades is $3,811,200, though these costs will become more clear as the revised design becomes more defined. Funding these costs will be presented in the next city budget. The only work which would commence on ,the Pier Architectural Upgrades this fiscal year would be the development of study renderings in the amount of $2,550. Therefore an allocation of $2,550 in County Prop A Open Space Funds should be made to the Pier Architectural Upgrades Project (CIP 98-621). Respectfully submitted, eph C. Mankawich Capital Improvement Program Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: an_ce,tit4,4) Viki Copeland Director of Finance jcm/c/pierfzcc.doc Concur: /Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Stephen R. Burrell City Manager • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 6-i ---9-i May 5, 1998 Regular meeting of May 12, 1998 Municipal Pier Retrofit - Construction Management Award of Contract Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve award of the construction management contract for the Municipal Pier Renovation to Concept Marine in the amount of $187,620. 2. Prescribe that the Director of Public Works reject all other proposals. 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within 10% of the contract cost. Background: In April, the Public Works Department, in anticipation that the structural retrofit portion of the project could go to construction in July, released a Request for Proposals for construction management services for the project. The RFP included requirements for design review and public relations in addition to the more standard construction management needs. Staff believes that review of the design by another consultant prior to final acceptance and bidding of the plans and specifications will assure the City of the best possible set of construction documents. Problems dealt with now will allow construction to progress that much smoother in the future. A fresh look by a different design firm may catch something which may have been passed by otherwise. Bringing the construction management team on line before the plans are complete will allow minor design changes to be made which may, through different construction techniques, save the City time and construction costs. Because the proposed construction will have an impact on the operation of businesses in the downtown area the proposal requirements include the implementation of a public relations campaign aimed at easing difficulties arising there from. It will be the construction managers responsibility to study the impact that construction timing, location and accessibility restrictions will have on neighboring businesses, residents and beach - goers. Newsletters, informational posters, newspaper releases and public meetings will keep the effected parties aware of construction progress and changes in scheduling through the construction period. lh • • On May 7, 1998 the City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department received four proposals for the performance of construction management services for the Municipal Pier Renovation. The project teams which responded were as follows: Firm Location Fee 1. Concept Marine Associates 2. Moffatt & Nichol Engineers 3. Vanir Construction Management 4. Bovis Construction Corporation Analysis: Marina Del Rey, CA Long Beach, CA Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles, CA $187,620 $194,250 $209,310 $228,432 The proposals were reviewed for their thoroughness and compliance with the RFP. Interviews were held with all four consulting teams on May 5, 1998. A conference held after the interviews revealed that though there were aspects of each proposal and each team that satisfied the review board, one firm clearly met or exceeded the expectations outlined in the request for proposals. Concept Marine put together a proposal with a good understanding of the project goals, an excellent reputation for working with previous clients and by far the most experience in managing the rehabilitation of marine structures similar to the Hermosa Municipal Pier. The Manhattan Beach, Venice, Huntington Beach, Redondo Beach, Monterey and Santa Monica Piers are projects for which Concept Marine has performed construction management services. All projects were completed successfully without claims. The Department of Public Works therefore recommends award of the construction management contract for the Municipal Pier Structural Retrofit Project to Concept Marine Associates, Inc. in the amount of $187,620. Fiscal Impact: It is recommended that $206,382 ($187,620 + a 10% contingency) of the County Proposition A Open Space Funds(121) previously allocated to the Pier Renovation Project be used for construction management costs. Respectfully submitted, Joseph C. Mankawich Capital Improvement Program Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance Concur: hiarold C. Williams Director of Public Works/City Engineer Steph R. urrell City anager • May 7, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 12, 1998 EDUCATIONAL SITE VISIT PROGRAM MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding with The County of Los Angles Public Works Department for the educational site visit reimbursement program. Background: The County of Los Angles and the City of Hermosa Beach are Permittees to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Storm Water Permit (NPDES Permit) issued by the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Both the County and the City are required by the NPDES Permit to perform industrial/commercial education site visits, to apprise business owners and facility operators of the NPDES Permit, and best management practices to enhance runoff from these properties. On August 12, 1997, the County Board of Supervisors approved making funds available from the County to the City for site visits. The County of Los Angles Public Works Director was authorized to develop a Memorandum of Understanding with the City for the educational site visit reimbursement program. (see attachment A) Analysis: The City of Hermosa Beach has been conducting site visits since 1994 as it was mandated by Natural Resources Defense Council lawsuit settlement. The site visit inspection has cost the City approximately $7,000 per year. Staff is recommending that educational site visits be continued with the County of Los Angles site visit reimbursement program. Inspections were made at 209 potential sites for storm water pollution in 1997. Results of the Hermosa Beach 1997 site visit survey and the comparison with the previous years are attached as Attachment B. 1i • • Fiscal Impact: The county will reimburse the city for the city's actual cost in conducting the site visits up to a maximum rate of $34.00 per food establishment and $50.00 per facility for all other required categories. The County Site Visit Reimbursement Program will relieve the city's Sewer Fund obligation by approximately $7,000 per year. Respectfully submitted, Homayoun Behboodi Assistant Engineer Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: arold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Stephen R. urrell City Mana• -r srl. f. b95. pwfi Ies.ccitems.edsite • MEMORANDUM O F UNDERSTANDING THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, made and entered into this day of , 1998, by and between the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY", and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation in the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as "CITY". W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY are Permittees to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Stormwater Permit, hereinafter referred to as "NPDES PERMIT", issued by the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, by Order No. 96-054, NPDES No. CAS614001, on July 15, 1996, which permit will expire on July 30, 2001; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY are required by the NPDES PERMIT to perform industrial/commercial educational site visits, hereinafter referred to as "SITE VISITS", to apprise business owners/facility operators of the NPDES PERMIT and Best Management Practices to enhance runoff from these properties; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY Board of Supervisors approved Item No. 41 (CRON No. 97213LAC0014) on August 12, 1997, making funds available from the COUNTY to the CITY for SITE VISITS and authorizing the Director of Public Works to develop a Memorandum of Understanding with the CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the COUNTY and CITY and of the promises herein contained, it is hereby understood as follows: IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: A. This Memorandum of Understanding will become effective 60 days after the CITY submits to the COUNTY its database listing of industrial and commercial facilities, except that the effective date will be no sooner than the date of execution. The database listing of industrial and commercial facilities shall identify all facilities within the CITY's jurisdiction as specified in Part 2, Section V.B.3.a. of the NPDES PERMIT, as summarized in ATTACHMENT A hereto. The database listing shall be PC based, in dBASE IV (*.DBF) format. The media format shall be a PC formatted 3 1/2" floppy diskette. The field names, order, width and format (i.e., character, numeric, etc.) shall be in keeping with ATTACHMENT B. - 1 - ATTACHMENT A • • B. The database listing of all industrial and commercial facilities submitted to the COUNTY, as well as the quarterly database listing of SITE VISITS, required for reimbursement by this Memorandum of Understanding, will be submitted by the COUNTY to the Regional Water Quality Control Board as required by Part 2, Section V.B. of the NPDES PERMIT, unless instructed otherwise by the CITY. A PC based database program, SiteViz, which includes the fields described in the Program Summary and Guidance document for the Industrial and Commercial Education Program, May 1997, provided to the CITY by the COUNTY, may be used for this purpose. C. This Memorandum of Understanding will terminate on June 30, 2001, except that either the COUNTY or CITY may terminate this Memorandum of Understanding prior to that date by giving 30 days prior written notice to the other Party. D. The CITY agrees to update its database listing at least annually to identify all new facilities and update information on existing facilities and to submit such updated database to the COUNTY (see ATTACHMENT B). E. Random checking of the CITY's database listing of industrial and commercial facilities may be performed by the COUNTY to ensure proper accounting and accuracy. The COUNTY will inform the CITY of any discrepancy in the list and a new database listing may be requested. F. The COUNTY has determined the total number of SITE VISITS eligible to be funded based on the number of facilities identified within the CITY and the frequency of SITE VISITS required by the NPDES PERMIT. This total appears in ATTACHMENT C hereto. The CITY will conduct or contract (using standard CITY selection process) to conduct the required number of SITE VISITS for the identified facilities at the frequency required by the NPDES PERMIT. G. The CITY understands and acknowledges that total funding for the site visit reimbursement program is limited. Allocation of funds to each individual city is on a first -come -first -serve basis. Based on the foregoing, the COUNTY has determined the total funding to be allocated to the CITY and the maximum annual reimbursement. The total appears in ATTACHMENT C hereto. H. Based on the CITY's update of the database listing under Paragraph D herein, ATTACHMENT C may be modified upon mutual agreement of the parties. 2 • • I. The COUNTY will reimburse the CITY for the CITY's actual cost in conducting the SITE VISITS up to a maximum rate of $34 per food establishment and $50 per facility for all other required categories. The CITY will provide to the COUNTY, along with each invoice, a full disclosure of its costs to perform SITE VISITS. J. The CITY shall invoice the COUNTY quarterly for services accrued through the following dates within each quarter for reimbursement of SITE VISITS performed (March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31). The CITY'S reimbursement will be based on the CITY's itemized database listing of performed SITE VISITS, to be submitted to the COUNTY on a quarterly basis as required by Part 2, Section V.B. of the NPDES PERMIT. The CITY agrees to utilize an invoice sheet as provided (ATTACHMENT D) to help expedite payment. Invoices are to be sent to COUNTY Department of Public Works - Fiscal Division as outlined on ATTACHMENT D. A copy of the invoice and the database listing of performed SITE VISITS are to be sent to COUNTY Department of Public Works - Environmental Programs Division as outlined on ATTACHMENT B. Both the invoice and corresponding database listing of performed SITE VISITS must be received by each corresponding Division within 10 days of the last day of each quarter. K. The CITY shall provide to the COUNTY by July 5 of each year an estimate of the fourth quarter's (COUNTY's fiscal year is July 1 to June 30) performed SITE VISITS as provided in ATTACHMENT D.1. L. If CITY contracts with the COUNTY for industrial waste services, the COUNTY, at no cost to the CITY, will perform SITE VISITS for those facilities listed in the COUNTY Department of Public Works - Industrial Waste Section database covered by said contract as specified in ATTACHMENT E. The CITY has the option to request incorporation of the non -industrial waste permitted facilities to the program as set forth in ATTACHMENT E. M. In addition, the CITY has the option of utilizing the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (LACDHS) to perform SITE VISITS for the food establishments. The COUNTY will administer this program as specified in ATTACHMENT F. In that event, the City agrees that the LACDHS' database listing of food establishments will be used to determine the facilities requiring SITE VISITS. N. Notwithstanding Paragraph J, the City agrees not to invoice the COUNTY for SITE VISITS to be performed by the COUNTY pursuant to Paragraphs L & M. • i O. The total annual reimbursement to the CITY shall not exceed one-quarter of its total estimated four-year program cost as set forth in ATTACHMENT C, except that all funds allocated to the CITY and not reimbursed within a given fiscal year will be added to the funds designated for the CITY in the following year's budget for this program, subject to the limitations set forth in Paragraphs G and Q herein. P. Subject to the provisions of Paragraphs F, G and 0 herein, the COUNTY agrees to reimburse the CITY based on approved, properly certified CITY invoices no later than 60 days after the invoices are received by the COUNTY. Upon tezmination of this Memorandum of Understanding, all fu:.d5 for t_ he reimbursement program designated to the CITY whicla have not been used, or for which properly certified ;_nvoices for SITE VISITS have not been received by the COUNTY, shall revert back to the COUNTY's use for other cities in the program. Q. R. The CITY agrees to indemnify, defend, and save harmless the COUNTY and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District and their agents, officers, and employees from and against any and all liability, expense (including defense costs and legal fees), or claims for damages of any nature whatsoever, including without limitation bodily injury, death, personal injury, or property damage (including property of the CITY) arising from or connected with any alleged act, error, or omission of the CITY, its agents, contractors, officers, or employees undertaken pursuant to this Memorandum of Understanding, except to the extent such is attributed to the negligent or willful acts or omissions of the COUNTY and its agents, officers, and active employees. S. The foregoing paragraph notwithstanding, the CITY further agrees to release the COUNTY and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District and their agents, officers and employees from any Worker's Compensation suits, liability, or expense, arising from or connected with any services performed pursuant to this Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the CITY by any person, excluding Workers' Compensation claims made by the COUNTY, it agents, officers, and employees. 4 ACCEPTED AND AGREED: HARRY W. STONE Director of Public Works County of Los Angeles UNIT2\CRIOS\MOU\MOUCITY.RE V City Manager City of Hermosa Beach • • HERMOSA BEACH 1997 SITE VISIT SURVEY AND COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS YEARS Food Service Businesses Point scores of the 122 food service businesses ranged from 0 (low pollution potential) to a high of 76. the average score was 17. A chart showing the point distribution is provided (see Figure 1). Five (5) businesses had score of over 40, which was an "elevated score" as determined in the original survey. Other results, and a comparison with earlier surveys are: Food Service Businesses 1994-1995 1995-1996 1996-1997 Sites with Exposed Drain Inlets 19% 27% • 19% Sites with Good housekeeping 94% 98% 99% Sites with Personnel Training 20% 80% 81% Sites that Recycle 47% 61% 55% Mean Score 27 22 17 . *Score range is 0-100 with 100 being the greatest pollution potentia (Figure 1) Automotive Services Point scores of the 56 automotive service businesses ranged from 0 to a high of 52.5. the average score was 12.5. A chart showing the point distribution is provided (see Figure 2). No businesses had score of over 55, which was an "elevated score" as determined in the original survey. Automotive Services 1994-1995 1995-1996 1996-1997 Sites with Exposed Drain Inlets 14% 34% 25% Sites with Good housekeeping 82% 100% 93% Sites with Personnel Training 38% 88% 82% Sites that Recycle 56% 72% 70% Sites with Storm Water Treatment Systems 1 4 9 Mean Score 28 19 12.5 *Score range is 0-100 with 100 being the greatest pollution potentia (Figure 2) Other Businesses Point scores for the thirty-one (31) other businesses ranged from a low of 0 to a high of 15. The average score was 5. A chart showing the point distribution is provided (see figure 3). No businesses had scores of over 25, which was an "elevated score" as determined in the original survey. Other results, and a comparison with earlier surveys are: Other Businesses 1994-1995 1995-1996 1996-1997 Sites with Exposed Drain Inlets 13% 34% 23% Sites with Good housekeeping 60% 100% 100% Sites with Personnel Training 6% 67% 74% Sites that Recycle 17% 22% 39 Mean Score 13 12 5 *Score range is 0-100 with 100 being the greatest pollution potents (Figure3) ATTACHMENT B • • No measurements of pollutants in storm water run off were taken and a high score should not be construed as an indication that significant storm water pollution has been or will be occurring from any specific site. Conclusion and Recommendations: Staff is recommending that Educational Site Visit be continued with Los Angeles County Site Visit Reimbursement Program. The following conclusions and recommendations are limited and based upon observations and information obtained during interviews and site walks, not analytical testing of runoff. 1. The mean scores have improved (decreased) over the previous surveys. 2. There has been significant improvement in knowledge regarding storm water pollution at most of the sites inspected. However, knowledge of the underlying causes of storm pollution was still lacking. The distribution of public outreach materials should continue. 3. Although a majority of trash dumpsters were observed with the lids closed, a sizable number were open. A significant amount of litter had accumulated around 53 others. Outside storage of waste grease is usually located adjacent to the garbage dumpsters. Grease spills were not uncommon around these areas. An emphasis should be made to encourage business to: • Keep the dumpster and outside waste grease storage areas clean, • Ensure that all dumpsters and waste grease drums are equipped with lids, and spill container, and • Ensure that lids are closed on all dumpsters and waste grease drums when not in use. 4. Outdoor storage (without covering and/or spill containment) of pollutant materials such as drums or junk parts from auto repair shops should be discouraged. 5. All private storm water treatment systems and all tributary yard drains or catch basins should be painted or otherwise marked with the Heal -the -Bay or a similar "Don't Dump, Drains to Ocean" logo. All storm water treatment systems should be inspected on an annual basis by City personnel just prior to the rainy season. These treatment systems could become breeding areas for mosquitoes and should be properly treated or pumped dry during the dry season. srl.fb95.pwfiles.ccitems.edsiteA .rr • ‘2-4-971117--" 59/ 5 May 4, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 12, 1998 HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING JUNE 9, 1998 FOR A PUBLIC HEARING RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Adopt the attached resolution approving the engineer's report for Hermosa Beach Landscaping & Street Lighting District 1998-1999 ("District") made pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No.98-5907. 93-5/5 2. Adopt the attached resolution declaring the City Council intention to order certain improvements and to levy and collect assessment within the District for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1998 through June 30, 1999; and setting June 9, 1998, to accept public input on the matter of the proposed assessment. BACKGROUND: The District provides for the maintenance and operation of the City-wide street lighting program, and median and parkway landscaping. Staff conferred with the City Attorney to determine the applicability of Proposition 218 to the City's Landscaping and Street Lighting Assessment District. Briefly, Proposition 218 contains an exception for existing assessments imposed exclusively to fund capital costs and maintenance and operation costs for sidewalks, and streets. Based on the advice of the City Attorney, staff recommends that the City rely on this exemption and continue to levy assessments to pay for the maintenance and operation of street lights and median and parkway landscaping without complying with the requirements of the Proposition so long as the assessments are not increased. On March 24, 1998, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 98-5907 ordering the preparation of a report for Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999. 1 lj • • ANALYSIS: The proposed assessment rate for fiscal year 1998-1999 is $41.45 per equivalent dwelling unit, the same equivalent dwelling unit rate as used in fiscal year 1997-1998 to finance those landscaping and lighting improvements located in and along streets and sidewalks. The fiscal year 1998-1999 assessment rate will recover necessary funds to continue the operation and maintenance of the City's street lighting system and landscaping in and along the City's streets and sidewalks for one year. Adoption of both resolutions is necessary at this time so that a public hearing can be to take testimony on the assessments. The first resolution approves the report prepared by the Assessment Engineer for the Director of Public Works. Its adoption confirms that the report has been prepared prior to the public hearing. This report covers matters relating to the District and is on file in the City Clerk's office. The adoption of the second resolution provides for the setting of a public hearing for June 9, 1998 at 7:30 PM. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council will be provided with a resolution it may adopt ordering the assessments. As mentioned earlier, all decisions will be made after the public hearing and adoption of these resolutions will only confirm that the report has been prepared and that the public hearing will be held on June 9, 1998. ALTERNATIVES: An alternative available to City Council is: 1. Approve staff's recommendation. 2. Let the district lapse; thereby, causing a potential increase in General Fund obligations of $449,318. Respectfully submitted, Concur: d--,,„idieoGlitil arold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Homayo Behboodi Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Stephen Burrell City Manager Attachments: Engineer's Report Resolution Approving the District Report Resolution Setting a time and place for the Public Hearing S RL. fb9 5.. pwfi les. cc items. enginrpt • • RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1998 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1999, AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN RELATION THERETO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The public interest and convenience require, and it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California to order, certain improvements within an existing citywide assessment district for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1998 and ending June 30, 1999, and to levy and collect assessments against properties within the assessment district for that fiscal year. SECTION 2. The proposed improvements are the continued maintenance and operation of streets and sidewalks within the assessment district, including the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities located within public street and sidewalk rights-of-way, parkways and medians. SECTION 3. The assessment district is designated as the "Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999." The assessment district is comprised of all of the City of Hermosa Beach, as shown on the "MAP OF LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999" on file in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 4. The assessments to be levied and collected against the assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district for fiscal year 1998-1999 are not proposed to increase from the assessments levied and collected in fiscal year 1997-1998. SECTION 5. Reference is hereby made to the report prepared by the Assessment Engineer, Berryman & Henigar, entitled "Engineer's Report for Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street 970521 10649-00001 rdh/gp 1672897 0 • • Lighting District 1998-1999," on file in the Office of the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district. SECTION 6. The improvements shall be provided pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 (Section 22500, et seq.) of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 7. The assessment shall be levied and collected at the same time and in the same manner and with the same interest and penalties as general taxes of the City, which are collected for the City by the Los Angeles County Tax Collector. SECTION 8. Public property owned by any public agency and in use in the performance of a public function which is included within the boundaries of the assessment district shall be exempt from the assessment to be made to cover the costs and expenses of the improvements. SECTION 9. To expedite the making of the improvements, the City Council may transfer into the "Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 Fund," out of any money in the General Fund, any sums as it shall deem necessary, and the sums so transferred shall be deemed a loan to such fund and shall be repaid in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 10. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Tuesday, June 9, 1998, at the hour of 7:30 PM in the City Council Chamber, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California, is appointed as the date, time and place for hearing protests to the question of approving and confirming the levy of the proposed assessment. SECTION 11. The City Clerk is hereby authorized, designated and directed to give notice of the public hearing in the time, form and manner required by law. 2 970521 10649-00001 rdh/gp 1672897 0 • • SECTION 12. THE EASY READER, a weekly newspaper of general circulation circulated within the City, is hereby designated as the newspaper in which said notice shall be published. SECTION 13. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, shall cause the original of the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the minutes of the City Council meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th day of May, 1998. ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: , CITY ATTORNEY 3 970521 10649-00001 rdh/gp 1672897 0 • • RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT IN CONNECTION WITH HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, by its Resolution No. 98-5907, adopted March 24, 1998, ordered the Director of Public Works to make and file with the City Clerk a written report pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 (Section 22500, et seq.) of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California in connection with the proposed maintenance and operation of certain street and sidewalk improvements within an existing assessment district designated as the "Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Lighting District 1998-1999," and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works appointed Berryman & Henigar as the Assessment Engineer, and the Assessment Engineer prepared and filed in the office of the City Clerk a written report pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk presented the report of the Assessment Engineer to the City Council, and the City Council carefully examined, inspected and considered the report and is satisfied with the report and with each and all of the items set forth therein; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The report of the Assessment Engineer entitled "Engineer's Report for Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999," which report was prepared and filed pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of 970522 10649-00001 gp 1672898 0 • • Division 15 (Section 22500, et seq.) of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, is hereby approved as filed. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, shall cause the original of the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the minutes of the City Council meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th day of May, 1998. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the Cityof Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: , CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: , CITY ATTORNEY 2 970522 10649-00001 gp 1672898 0 �►.sirf- 111111/I 11111//\\\' W ar Co. S INC. ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared by: Berryman & Henigar May 5, 1998 15124.00 City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 ENGINEER'S REPORT HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999 May 5, 1998 Page i The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council. DATED: May 5, 1998 oan E. ox R.C.E. No. 41965 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the 77N day of , 1998. City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach Los Ang les County, alifornia / By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, on the day of , 1998. City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County, California By I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Assessment Roll and Diagram were filed with the County Auditor of the County of Los Angeles, on the day of , 1998. City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach Los Angeles County, California By s:1$project\hermosa\llmd9899\reportthermosa Ilmd 9899.doc Berryman & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach • Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 May 5, 1998 Page 11 HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999 ENGINEER'S REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Certificates Report 1 Part A - Plans and Specifications 3 Part B - Estimate of Cost 5 Part C - Assessment Roll 6 Part D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment 7 Part E - Property Owner List 10 Part F - Assessment District Boundary 11 s:\$project\hermosa\llmd9899Veportthermosa Ilmd 9899.doc Berryman & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street :ghting District 1998-1999 1 May 5, 1998 Page 1 FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation adopted by the Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for: HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999 hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District" or "District", I, Joan E. Cox, P.E., the authorized representative of Berryman & Henigar, the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submit herewith the "Report" consisting of six (6) parts as follows: PART A Plans and specifications for the improvements showing and describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements. PART B An estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements for FY 1998-99, including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith. PART C An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District. PART D The method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels. s:\$projectthermosa JImd9899\repor \hermosa Ilmd 9899.doc Berryman & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and StreetIrghting District 1998-1999 • May 5, 1998 Page 2 PART E A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within the Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles. PART F The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District. s:\$project\hermosa\JImd9899\report\hemiosa Ilmd 9899.doc Berryman & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS May 5, 1998 Page 3 The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Hermosa Beach, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be operated, serviced and maintained as generally described as follows: DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999 The proposed improvements for FY 1998-99 may be generally described as the continued maintenance and operation of streets and sidewalks within the District, including the operation, servicing and maintenance of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities that are located in and along such streets and sidewalks, including but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services described as follows: Street Landscaping and Appurtenant Facilities Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation systems, hardscapes and fixtures in public street and sidewalk rights-of-way, including parkways and medians, within the boundaries of the Assessment District. Street Lighting and Appurtenant Facilities Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant facilities as required to provide street lighting and traffic signals in public street and sidewalk rights-of-way, including parkways and medians, within the boundaries of the Assessment District. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscaping, lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping, lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the maintenance of any of the lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for the lighting facilities. or for the lighting or operation of the landscaping or appurtenant facilities. s:1$projectthermosa\ lmd9899\reporthem,osa Ilmd 9899.doc Berryman & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 May 5, 1998 Page 4 The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing and describing the general nature, location, and the extent of the improvements, are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are incorporated herein by reference. s:1$projectlhermosa\md98991reporttermosa Hmd 9899.doc Berryman & Henigar 1 City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 • May 5, 1998 Page 5 PART B ESTIMATE OF COST The estimated cost of the operation, servicing and maintenance of the street and sidewalk improvements for fiscal year 1998-99, as described in Part A, are summarized herein and described below. . LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT Proposed Budget - Fiscal Year 1998-99 Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance and Servicing • Median & Pkwy Landscaping Maintenance and Servicing • Lighting Maintenance and Servicing • Tree Trimming $389,483 Administration Costs $17,561 Insurance $32,030 Assessment Proceedings Costs $8,500 Equipment Replacement $21,253 Proposed Capital Improvements $230,000 Capital Improvement Reserves $144,645 Cash -Flow Reserves (20%) $90,000 Fund Balance (positive amount) ($484,154) TOTAL TO ASSESSMENT $449,318 The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. s:\$project\hermosa JImd9899Veport\hermosa Ilmd 9899.doc Berriman & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach • Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 • PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL May 5, 1998 Page 6 The total proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 1998-99 and the amount of the total proposed assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel within the District, as shown on the latest assessment roll at the Los Angeles County Assessor's Office, are contained in the Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, which is incorporated herein by reference. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the Los Angeles County assessment roll and this roll is, by reference, made part of this Report. s:\$project\hermosaflmd9899Veportlhermosa Ilmd 9899.doc Berr.man & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach • • May 5, 1998 Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 Page 7 PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT GENERAL Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include operation, maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and landscaping. The 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. Section 22573 provides that: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable Tots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements" (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "benefit assessment" rather than a "special tax." Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of all publicly owned property in use in the performance of a public function. Railroad and utility rights-of-way are also exempt from assessment. BENEFIT ANALYSIS • Street Lighting and Traffic Signals - The proper functioning of street lighting and traffic signals is imperative for the welfare and safety of the public and property throughout the City. Proper operation, maintenance and servicing of the street lighting system benefits properties within the District by providing proper illumination for ingress and egress and safe traveling at night. Properties within the District also benefit from the proper functioning of the District's traffic signal system. Proper operation of the street Tight and traffic signal systems is imperative to public convenience, orderly traffic flow, enhanced congestion management and safety. Improved security, fuel conservation, protection of property from crime and vandalism, and reduction of traffic accidents, are special and direct benefits to all properties within the City; lighting benefits are directly related to public safety and property protection and therefore increase property values. s:\$project\hermosa\Ilmd9899\report\hemiosa Ilmd 9899.doc Berry.an & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 May 5, 1998 Page 8 • Median and Parkway Landscaping and Tree Trimming - Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value. - The City maintains trees and miscellaneous shrubbery and landscaping throughout the City. The trees, shrubbery and landscaping are located within the public street and sidewalk rights-of-way, including parkways and medians. These trees, shrubbery and landscaping provide an aesthetically pleasing environment, shade, beautification, and, according to some authorities, air purification and sound attenuation. These positive attributes increase the value of all properties throughout the City. Therefore, all property within the District receive an overall specific and direct benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the street median and parkway landscaping and street tree trimming programs. Special benefits which are received by all parcels in the City are considered to be City-wide Benefits, and the associated costs of these special benefits are spread equally, based on Equivalent Dwelling Units, to all parcels within the District. All properties in the District benefit from the operation, maintenance and servicing of the street lighting, traffic signals, street median and parkway landscaping and street tree trimming. The degree of benefit to each parcel of land varies depending on its land use and the size of the parcel. If assessments were spread on an individual parcel basis, not considering land use or parcel size, it would not be an equitable method of spread because a single family parcel would pay the same assessment as a 50 -unit apartment parcel or a large commercial parcel. Therefore, the method for spreading the improvement costs, which must be based on special and direct benefit, is on an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) basis. The EDU method uses the residential dwelling unit as the basic unit and compares other uses to it, as follows: • Residential parcels are assessed based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel, where each residential dwelling unit equals one EDU. • Non-residential parcels have been converted into EDU's, based on engineering judgment taking into consideration the size of the parcel and the amount of frontage along the street. Every parcel is assessed a minimum of one (1) EDU. There are a total of 10,840 EDU's within the Assessment District. sA$project\hermosa\llmd98991reportthermosa Ilmd 9899.doc Berryman & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 May 5, 1998 Page 9 ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATION Based on a budget of $449,318, as shown in Part B of this report, the preliminary assessment rate for FY 1998-99 is calculated as follows: $449,318 T 10,840 EDU's = $41.45 per EDU The assessment for FY 1997-98 was $41.45 per EDU. s: $project hermosa lmd9899Veportlhermosa Ilmd 9899.doc Berryman & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 May 5, 1998 Page 10 PART E PROPERTY OWNER LIST A list of names and addresses of the owners of all parcels within this District is shown on the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles, which by reference is hereby made a part of this report. This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach. s: $project hermosa Imd9899VeportTermosa Ilmd 9899.doc Berryman & Henigar City of Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 PART F ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY May 5, 1998 Page 11 The boundaries of the District are coterminous with the boundaries of the City of Hermosa Beach. A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District, the boundaries of any zones within the District, and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, and is incorporated herein by reference. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Los Angeles for fiscal year 1998-99. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. s:\Sprojectthermosa\llmd9899\reporthermosa Ilmd 9899.doc Deny:flan & Henigar • • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Basketball & Tennis Court Resurfacing Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: May 5, 1998 Regular meeting of May 12, 1998 1. Appropriate $30,000 in Park and Recreation Tax Funds(125) to cover costs for rehabilitation of court surfaces located at the Community Center and Clark Field. Background: The City of Hermosa Beach's regular park maintenance requires that the tennis and basketball courts in the city are to be resurfaced every five years. As these courts were last resurfaced in 1993, it is time again to rehabilitate them. Court resurfacing will insure the safety and enjoyment of these facilities for years to come. Analysis: This project intends to resurface tennis courts #1 through #4, located at the Community Center and the 2 tennis and 2 basketball courts at Clark Field. The Clark Field Courts are in especially poor condition, with large cracks transversing portions of both courts. An asphalt overlay with underlying reinforcing fabric will remedy this situation. The timing of the resurfacing is fortuitous as these newly resurfaced courts could be completed prior to construction of the skate track and new tennis courts at the Community Center, thereby lessening the impacts that those projects would have on the City's recreational services. Fiscal Impact: It is suggested that $30,000 ($27,273 + a 10% contingency) be appropriated from the Park & Recreation Tax Fund(125) to cover the costs for these court rehabilitation projects. The Park And Recreation Tax Fund(125) currently has a fund total of $351,397. Respectfully submitted, oseph C. Mankawich Capital Improvement Program Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: 6.1..22044c.ca-udJ Viki Copeland Director of Finance Concur: Marold C. Williams Director of Public Works/City Engineer Oa/ Mary ' • ow * Direc or of Community Resources Stephen R. City Manager lk • HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL %�-S917 April30, 1998 Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #24696 (C.U.P. CON NO. 97-5 & PDP NO. 97-4) LOCATION: 1550 MONTEREY BOULEVARD APPLICANT(S): MONTE WILLIAMS REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #24696 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit for a three -unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #24696 at their March 18, 1997 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 11 • • Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State 'Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Sol Blumenfeld, director Community Qevelopment Department Stephen R. B rr City Manager Respectfully submitted, Associate Planner f:b95\cd\fml 550 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • . RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #24696 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1550 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on May 12, 1998 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolutions P.C. No. 97-24 adopted after hearing on March 18, 1997. E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #24696 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 11, Block 54, First Addition to Hermosa Beach Tract, Recorded in Book 1, Pages 59 and 60 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of Said County, for a three -unit condominium project on land commonly known as1550 Monterey Boulevard, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 12th day of May, 1998. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California AF1'bST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY Efb95\cd\m155Ors May 7, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998 MOBILEHOME PARK REGULATIONS MARINELAND MOBILEHOME PARK Recommendation: That the City Council review the attached information provided by the City Attorney and provide direction to staff on how to proceed. Background: The City Council received several letters from residents in Marineland Mobilehome Park. The residents expressed concerns about increasing rents, the overall condition of the common areas, and State enforcement of the Mobilehome Parks Act. The attached information from the City Attorney responds to your request for information on the issue. Respe ii fully submitted, Stephen R. urrell City Manager 4 • MAY -06-1998 12:38 GLENN R. WATGON IgEERT 0. B6VeRLr HARRY L QERBHON DOUGLAS W. ARGUE MARK L LAMKEN eRWIN G, ADLER CAROL° D. PIEPER ALLEN E. RENNETT STEVEN L DOROC7 WuLAM I. ETAAUSz ANTHONY 8. DREWRY MITCHELL E. ABBOTT TIMOTHY L NEUFELD GREGORY W. BTEPANICICN ROCMELLE 9Row4G MICMACL JCNKING WIWAM B. ROIELL OUINN M. BARROW CAROL W. LYNCH JEFFREY A RABIN GREGORY M. KVNERT THOMAS M. JIM6G MICHELE SELL EAONERIG AMANDA F. BUBSKIND ROBERT C. CECCON 3AYRE WEAVER STCVCN N, KAurMANN 0ARY e. GANG JOHN J. HARRIS KEVIN 0. ENNIS ROBIN D. HARRIS MICHAEL ESTRADA IJ.LIRCNCG S. WIGNER GTE"CN R. ORR "'CHARDS WATSON&GERSHON98 • RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PROFESSIONAL CORPoMAT1oN THIRTY-EIGHTH FLOOR 323 SOUTH HOPE STREET LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90071-1469 (212) 626-8484 FACSIMILE (213) 828-oo78 IaQrwgIaw,com MICHAEL 0. GOLANTUONO e . T1LOEN KIM C. EDWARD DILKE3 PETER M. T}IOF5.ON 69880* L DIEDENIT1e JAMES L MARKMAN DEBORAH R. HAKMAN RU91N D. •+IGINCR MAGMA T. AG*MURA Ir rcMR O. esUME SAUL JAFFE CRAIG A 9TEELE T. PETER PICROC DAVID ROBERT OANIELG DENJAMIN B4ANOUW w6WAM P. CURL.EY III D. 08418 FOX BOYD L HILL LYNN I. IBARA J ANET G, QOLCGON TERENCE R. 44GA DANIEL L. PNES USA BOND DIANE ARKOW GR039 ROY A. CLARKE P0YANNe DI*z MONTGOMERY ROBERT P.. B*LSUENA ERIKA M. FLEMING OLMA WAI-WEN 9UAN AMY W. CHINO PATRIOIA K. OLIVES KQTM A. WIUSON G*NORA L WILLIAMS KAGY 001.1.0616 KEYS May 6, 1998 Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 698 P.02/06 RICHARD RICHARDS (1916.1966) CAN 68*801500 Orrice 6o CAUFORNIA STREET SLIME 1600 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 9x111-612 (416) 451949. FAGSIMII.F (41S) 421.6469 ORANGE COUNTY OFFICC NUMBER ONE CMC CENTER CIRCLE BREA. CAUFORNIA 82621 (714) 990-0901 FACSIMILE (r1*) 590.6230 OF COUNSEL WILLIAM K KRAMER 0566064 OUR FILE NUMBER 10649-00001 Re: Mobilehome Park Regulation Dear Members of the City Council: Last month, several residents of the Marineland Mobilehome Park expressed concerns to the Council during the audience comment period regarding rising rents and other issues regarding management of the Park. The Council directed staff to return with information about State jurisdiction over mobilehome parks, rent control in mobilehome parks and city or resident purchase of mobilehome parks. This letter provides a general overview of these issues. 1. May a city assume jurisdiction over mobilehome parks from the State? Under California Health & Safety Code ("H&S") Section 18300(b), a city may assume responsibility for enforcement of the Mobilehome Parks Act (the "Act") and any regulations adopted pursuant to the Act upon thirty (30) days' written notice from the city council to the Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") and after approval of the assumption by HCD. The necessary requirements for assumption of enforcement responsibility are found in Title 25, Section 1004 of the California Code of Regulations ("CCR"). Briefly summarized, a city must adopt an ordinance which contains the following: MAY-06-1998 12 39 AihRI CHARDS WATSON&GERSHON98 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERsilig May 6, 1998 Page 2 • 698 P.03/06 a) a statement of assumption of responsibility for enforcement of the Mobilehome Parks Act and effective date of assumption; b) a statement that enough qualified personnel will be provided adequately to enforce the Act; c) adoption of the State schedule of fees for the enforcement program; d) a statement explicitly adopting the State enforcement program and objectives found in the Act and related regulations; e) a description of existing mobilehome parks in the city including conditions and occupancy status; and f) specific local objectives, program plan and timetable to achieve enforcement compliance. In addition to the ordinance, a city must be able to demonstrate actual inspection capability in making a mobilehome installation inspection to the satisfaction of HCD, must be willing to use State approved forms for permit applications and must agree to send copies of all permits to operate issued by the city to HCD. When assumption is approved, HCD will transfer responsibility for enforcement of the Act to the city along with all records for parks within the city's jurisdiction. 2. If a city assumes responsibility for enforcement of the Act, what is the extent of the city's jurisdiction? The city will have the same jurisdiction over the parks that HCD had prior to the city's assumption of enforcement responsibility. State statutes and regulations still will govern those aspects of mobilehome park regulation previously enforced by HCD. The city will not be able to require a park owner to comply with any requirement that is contrary to State law. For example, since State statute permits manufactured homes in mobilehome parks, the city will not be able to prohibit manufactured homes in mobilehome parks even if the city has assumed responsibility for enforcement of the Mobilehome Parks Act. MAY -06-1998 12:39 OHARDS WATSON&GERSHON98 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON May'6, 1998 Page 3 698 P.04/06 3. What steps are necessary in order to adopt rent control for mobilehome parks? As of 1992, 58 cities and 6 counties in California had adopted rent control for mobilehome parks.'- While the courts have upheld the facial validity of mobilehome park rent control,Z'facts establishing the necessity for rent control are a prerequisite for adopting an ordinance regulating mobilehome park rents.3' A current local study showing a shortage of rental spaces or some other market driven reason for a park owner demanding and receiving excessive/exploitive rents is necessary. Additionally, some proof that excessive rent increases are driving coach owners to sell their homes at below market values would help to demonstrate the need for rent regulation. Be advised, however, that this type of proof must be provided through expert testimony and not merely anecdotal testimony from current or former coach owners. As a related point, frequently, a city will include in a rent control ordinance a "rollback" provision which is intended to "roll" mobilehome park rents back to levels existing prior to adoption of rent control. Such a retroactive provision is supportable only if strong evidence exists that rents were raised in anticipation of enactment of a rent control ordinance. A shorter time period between the rollback date and the effective date of the rent control ordinance will be easier for a city to justify than a longer period (such as more than a year). Legitimate reasons for adopting mobilehome rent control include prevention of excessive or exploitive rents, protecting the coach owners' investments in their mobilehomes, and protecting the ability of existing low and moderate income persons to stay in their mobilehomes.11 Preservation of affordable housing has been rejected as a valid reason for mobilehome park rent control. This is based on the argument that controlled lower rents lead to higher sale prices for coaches which in turn leads to higher mortgage payments for new buyers, 1/ Planner's Book of Lists, Governor's Office of Planning & Research, 1997. 2/ Carson Mobilehome Park Owners' Assn_ v. City of Carson, 35 Cal. 3d 184 (1983). 3/ Birkenfeld v. Berkeley, 17 Cal. 3d 129 (1976). 4/ See, Birkenfeld, supra; Carson, supra; Pennell v. City of San Jose, 485 U.S. 1 (1988); Adamson Cos. v. City of Malibu, 854 F. Supp. 1476 (C.D. Cal. 1994). MAY -06-1998 12:39 RICHARDS WATSON&GERSHON98 RICHARDS, WATSON & GEFPS• May 6, 1998 Page 4 • 698 P.05/06 rendering the total price of living in a mobilehome park (rent plus the mortgage payment) no longer affordable. 4. May a city use the power of eminent domain to purchase a park and operate it in order to provide affordable housing? A city may use the power of eminent domain to purchase a mobilehome park and operate it in order to provide the public benefit of affordable housing. A city also may consider simply negotiating with the owner for purchase.of the park. In either case, however, the city should expect to allocate funds for deferred maintenance, needed capital improvements and operating expenses in addition to the purchase price. Also, the city would be saddled with all of the responsibilities of being a landlord. Some cities that have purchased parks have subsequently sold them back to the residents in order to avoid becoming a landlord. 5. May the residents of a mobilehome park purchase the park? The residents of a mobilehome park may organize an association and purchase the park. There are numerous examples of successful resident owned and operated parks throughout the State. A city may lawfully contribute funds to aid the residents in purchasing the park or may even purchase the park and sell it back to the residents. The City of Fairfield, in northern California, has successfully completed four such sales in the last seven years. Additionally,. some State assistance is available to residents wishing to purchase their park through HCD's Mobilehome Park Resident Ownership Program. If the residents are successful in purchasing the park, there are several methods under which they may organize ownership of the park including subdivision of the park into individually owned spaces or condominiums or cooperative ownership through a resident owned corporation. As a first step toward resident ownership of a mobilehome park, California Civil Code Section 798.80 requires the owner of a mobilehome park to provide notice to a resident organization, organized for purposes of purchasing thepark, not less than thirty (30) days nor more than one year prior to entering into a written listing agreement with a real estate broker for sale of the park. In order to receive this notice, the resident organization is required to provide written notice to the park owner that the residents are interested in purchasing the park_ Such notice must be renewed every year after the initial notice. Additionally, the resident organization must provide the park MAY -06-1998 12:40 •HARDS WATSON&GERSHON98 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON May 6, 1998 Page 5 698 P.06/06 owner with the name and address of the officer of the organization to whom notice of listing for sale should be sent. Under certain conditions, the owner is not required to notify the resident organization if the park is to be transferred. These conditions include, but are not limited to, transfer of the park to a relative of the owner, transfer by gift, devise or operation of law, transfer by a corporation to an affiliate, transfer by a partnership to any of its partners or purchase of the park by a governmental entity under its power of eminent domain. The foregoing is a brief overview of a few of the issues connected with jurisdiction, rent control and resident ownership of mobilehome parks. At the Council's direction, a more detailed analysis of any of these issues can be provided as they pertain to Marineland Mobilehome Park_ Please do not hesitate to call me should you have any questionsor require additional information on any of the issues addressed in this letter. tru � yours, el Je City Attorney MJ:gg 0566054 cc: Steve Burrel]. City Manager TOTAL P.06 ARTICLE 1 - GENERAL INDEX Sec 798. Title and Application Sec 798.1. Application of Definitions Sec 798.2. Definition of Management ,,Sec: 798.3. Definition of Mobilehome Sec 798.4. Definition of Mobilehome Park Sec 798:6. Definition of Park Sec 798.7. Definition of New Construction See 798.8. • Definition of Rental Agreement "See•798.9. ''• Definition of Homeowner :'_Sec 798.10. Definition of Change of Use • Sec 798.11. Definition of Resident Sec 798.12. Definition of Tenancy Sec 798.14. Delivery of Notice ARTICLE 2 — RENTAL AGREEMENT Sec 798.15. In Writing and Required Contents Sec 798.16. Inclusion of Other Provisions ` See' 798.17. Rental Agreements Exempt from Rent Control Sec 798.18. Length of Agreement; Comparable Monthly Terms Sec 798.19. No Waiver of Chapter 2.5 Rights ,Sec 798.20. No Private Club Discrimination Sec798.21... : Not Principal Residence - Rent Control Exempt Sec'798.22.; , , Recreational Vehicles in Parks cit ARTICLE 3 — RULES AND REGULATIONS Sec 798.23. Sec 798.24. Sec 798.25. Sec 798.25.5. Sec 798.26. Sec 798.27. Sec 798.28. Sec 798.28.5. Sec 798.29. Sec 798.29.5. Application to Park Owners & Employees Posting of Common Area Facility Hours Amendments to Rules and Regulations - Notice Void Rules Management Entry into Mobilehomes Notice of Zoning or Use Permit Disclosure of Park Owner's Name Vehicle Removal Notice of Mobilehome Ombudsman Notice of Utility Interruption ARTICLE 4 — FEES AND CHARGES Sec 798.30. Notice of Rent Increase; Sec 798.31. Authorized Fees Charged 'Sec798.32. Unlisted Services Without Notice - No Fees Sec, 798.33. *lc 798:34. , Sec 798.35. Sec' 798:36. `'S 798.37. c' See 798;38.' Sec 798.39. Pet Fees • Guest Fees Members of Immediate Family - No Fees Enfoicement of Park Rules - No Fees Entry, Hookup, Landscaping & Maintenance Charges Utility Service Billing; Rate Schedule Security Deposits ARTICLE 4 (continued) Sec 798.40. No Lien/Security Interest Except by Mutual Agreement Sec 798.41. Utilities Separately Billed – Rent Control Exempt Sec 798.42. Fines & Forfeitures Not Chargeable Sec 798.43. Disclosure of Common Area Utility Charges ARTICLE 4.5 — RENT CONTROL Sec 798.45. New Construction Exempt Sec 798.49. Government Fees & Assessments Which Are Exempt ARTICLE 5 — HOMEOWNER COMMUNICATIONS AND MEETINGS Sec 798.50. Legislative Intent Sec 798.51. Right to Assemble, Canvass, Petition & Speakers Sec 798.52. Injunctive Action to Enforce Rights ARTICLE 5_.5 — HOMEOWNERS MEETINGS WITH MANAGEMENT Sec 798.53. Management Meetings with Residents ARTICLE 6 — TERMINATION OF TENANCY Sec 798.55. Legislative Intent/Terminate for Cause/60-Day Notice Sec 798.56. Seven Authorized Reasons for Termination of Tenancy Sec 798.56.a. Notice Requirement of Legal Owner/Jr. Lienholder Sec 798.57. Statements of Reasons in Notice Sec 798.58. No Termination to Make Space for Park Owner's Buyer Sec 798.59. 60 -Day Notice by Resident of Termination Sec 798.60. Application of Other Unlawful Detainer Laws Sec 798.61. Abandoned Mobilehomes – Procedures ARTICLE 7 — TRANSFER OF MOBILEHOME OR MOBILEHOME Sec 798.70. Sec 798.71. Sec 798.72. * Sec 798.73. Sec 798.74. Sec 798.75. Sec 798.76. Sec 798.77. Sec 798.78. Sec 798.79. Sec 798.80. Sec 798.81. Sec 798.82. * Sec 798.83. PARK "For Sale" Signs Management Showing or Listing – Prohibitions No Transfer or Selling Fee Removal of Mobilehome upon Third Party Sale Management Approval of Buyer; Credit Rating Refund Rental Agreement Required for Park Occupancy Seniors Only Restrictions No Waiver of Rights Rights of Heir or Joint Tenant of Owner Repossession of Mobilehome; Sale to Third Party Sale of Park – Notice by Management Listing or Sales – Prohibitions School Impact Fee Disclosure Homeowner Repair of the Space ARTICLE 8 — ACTIONS. PROCEEDINGS AND PENALTIES Sec 798.84. Notice of Lawsuit for Failure to Maintain Sec 798.85. Attorney's Fees and Costs • Sec 798.86. Management Penalty for Willful Violation Sec 798.87. Public Nuisances and Abatement Sec 798.88. Injunction for Violation of Park Rules ARTICLE 9 — SUBDIVISIONS. COOPERATIVES. AND CONDOMINIUMS * Sec 799. Definitions • Sec 799.1. Rights Governed Sec 799.1.5. Advertising Sale of Home; "For Sale" Signs Sec 799.2. Listing or Showing of Home by Park Management • Sec 799.3. Removal of Mobilehome upon Third Party Sale * Sec 799.4. Withholding Prior Approval of Purchaser • Sec 799.5. Seniors Only Restrictions Sec 799.6. No Waiver of Rights • Sec 799.7. Notice of Utility Interruption Sec 799.8. School Impact Fee Disclosure * Sec 799.9. Caregivers • • • WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgat...docID=700655488+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 798-798.14 798. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Mobilehome Residency Law." 798.1. Unless the provisions or context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall govern the construction of this chapter. 798.2. "Management" means the owner of a mobilehome park or an agent or representative authorized to act on his behalf in connection with matters relating to a tenancy in the park. 798.3. (a) "Mobilehome" is a structure designed for human habitation and for being moved on a street or highway under permit pursuant to Section 35790 of the Vehicle Code. Mobilehome includes a manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code, and a mobilehome, as defined in Section 18008 of the Health and Safety Code, but, except as provided in subdivision (b), does not include a recreational vehicle, as defined in Section 799.29 of this code and Section 18010 of the Health and Safety Code or a commercial coach as defined in Section 18001.8 of the Health and Safety Code. (b) "Mobilehome," for purposes of this chapter, other than Section 798.73, also includes trailers and other recreational vehicles of all types defined in Section 18010 of the Health and Safety Code, other than motor homes, truck campers, and camping trailers, which are used for human habitation if the occupancy criteria of either paragraph (1) or (2), as follows, are met: (1) The trailer or other recreational vehicle occupies a mobilehome site in the park, on November 15, 1992, under a rental agreement with a term of one month or longer, and the trailer or other recreational vehicle occupied a mobilehome site in the park prior to January 1, 1991. (2) The trailer or other recreational vehicle occupies a mobilehome site in the park for nine or more continuous months commencing on or after November 15, 1992. "Mobilehome" does not include a trailer or other recreational vehicle located in a recreational vehicle park subject to Chapter 2.6 (commencing with Section 799.20), except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b) of Section 799.45. 798.4. "Mobilehome park" is an area of land where two or more mobilehome sites are rented, or held out for rent, to accommodate mobilehomes used for human habitation. 798.6. "Park" is a manufactured housing community as defined in Section 18801 of the Health and Safety Code, or a mobilehome park. 1 of 2 05/06/98 09:02:49 WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/Oat...docID=700655488+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve. 798.7. "New Construction" means any newly constructed spaces initially held out for rent after January 1, 1990. 798.8. "Rental agreement" is an agreement between the management and the homeowner establishing the terms and conditions of a park tenancy. A lease is a rental agreement. 798.9. "Homeowner" is a person who has a tenancy in a mobilehome park under a rental agreement. 798.10. "Change of use" means a use of the park for a purpose other than the rental, or the holding out for rent, of two or more mobilehome sites to accommodate mobilehomes used for human habitation, and does not mean the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a park rule or regulation. A change of use may affect an entire park or any portion thereof. "Change of use" includes, but is not limited to, a change of the park or any portion thereof to a condominium, stock cooperative, planned unit development, or any form of ownership wherein spaces within the park are to be sold. 798.11. "Resident" is a homeowner or other person who lawfully occupies a mobilehome. 798.12. "Tenancy" is the right of a homeowner to the -use of a site within a mobilehome park on which to locate, maintain, and occupy a mobilehome, site improvements, and accessory structures for human habitation, including the use of the services and facilities of the park. 798.14. Unless otherwise provided, all notices required by this chapter shall be either delivered personally to the homeowner or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the homeowner at his or her site within the mobilehome park. 2 of 2 05/06/98 09:02:50 WAIS Document Retrieval CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 798.15-798.23 http://www.Ieginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgat...docID=700655488+7+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve 798.15. The rental agreement shall be in writing and shall contain, in addition to the provisions otherwise required by law to be included, all of the following: (a) The term of the tenancy and the rent therefor. (b) The rules and regulations of the park. (c) A copy of the text of this chapter shall be attached as an exhibit and shall be incorporated into the rental agreement by reference. Management shall provide all homeowners with a copy of this chapter prior to February 1 of each year, if a significant change was made in the chapter by legislation enacted in the prior year. (d) A provision specifying that (1) it is the responsibility of the management to provide and maintain physical improvements in the common facilities in good working order and condition and (2) with respect to a sudden or unforeseeable breakdown or deterioration of these improvements, the management shall have a reasonable period of time to repair the sudden or unforeseeable breakdown or deterioration and bring the improvements into good working order and condition after management knows or should have known of the breakdown or deterioration. For purposes of this subdivision, a reasonable period of time to repair a sudden or unforeseeable breakdown or deterioration shall be as soon as possible in situations affecting a health or safety condition, and shall not exceed 30 days in any other case except where exigent circumstances justify a delay. (e) A description of the physical improvements to be provided the homeowner during his or her tenancy. (f) A provision listing those services which will be provided at the time the rental agreement is executed and will continue to be offered for 'the term of tenancy and the fees, if any, to be charged for those services. (g) A provision stating that management may charge a reasonable fee for services relating to the maintenance of the land and premises upon which a mobilehome is situated in the event the homeowner fails to maintain the land or premises in accordance with the rules and regulations of the park after written notification to the homeowner and the failure of the homeowner to comply within 14 days. The written notice shall state the specific condition to be corrected and an estimate of the charges to be imposed by management if the services are performed by management or its agent. (h) All other provisions governing the tenancy. 798.16. The rental agreement may include such other provisions permitted by law, but need not include specific language contained in state or local laws not a part of this chapter. 798.17. (a) (1) Rental agreements meeting the criteria of subdivision (b) shall be exempt from any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure adopted by any local governmental entity which establishes a maximum amount that a landlord may charge a tenant for rent. The terms of a rental agreement meeting the criteria of subdivision (b) shall prevail over conflicting provisions of an ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure limiting or 1 of 5 05/06/98 09:08:57 WAIS Document Retrieval 2of5 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-binigat...doelD=700655488+7+0+0&WAISaction=retrieva restricting rents in mobilehome parks, only during the term of the rental agreement or one or more uninterrupted, continuous extensions thereof. If the rental agreement is not extended and no new rental agreement in excess of 12 months' duration is entered into, then the last rental rate charged for the space under the previous rental agreement shall be the base rent for purposes of applicable provisions of law concerning rent regulation, if any. (2) In the first sentence of the first paragraph of a rental agreement entered into on or after January 1, 1993, pursuant to this section, there shall be set forth a provision in at least 12 -point boldface type if the rental agreement is printed, or in capital letters if the rental agreement is typed, giving notice to the homeowner that the rental agreement will be exempt from any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure adopted by any local governmental entity which establishes a maximum amount that a landlord may charge a tenant for rent. (b) Rental agreements subject to this section shall meet all of the following criteria: (1) The rental agreement shall be in excess of 12 months' duration. (2) The rental agreement shall be entered into between the management and a homeowner for the personal and actual residence of the homeowner. (3) The homeowner shall have at least 30 days from the date the rental agreement is first offered to the homeowner to accept or reject the rental agreement. (4) The homeowner who executes a rental agreement offered pursuant to this section may void the rental agreement by notifying management in writing within 72 hours of the homeowner's execution of the rental agreement. (c) If, pursuant to paragraph (3) or (4) of subdivision (b), the homeowner rejects the offered rental agreement or rescinds a signed rental agreement, the homeowner shall be entitled to instead accept, pursuant to Section 798.18, a rental agreement for a term of 12 months or less from the date the offered rental agreement was to have begun. In the event the homeowner elects to have a rental agreement for a term of 12 months or less, including a month-to-month rental agreement, the rental agreement shall contain the same rental charges, terms, and conditions as the rental agreement offered pursuant to subdivision (b), during the first 12 months, except for options, if any, contained in the offered rental agreement to extend or renew the rental agreement. (d) Nothing in subdivision (c) shall be construed to prohibit the management from offering gifts of value, other than rental rate reductions, to homeowners who execute a rental agreement pursuant to this section. (e) With respect to any space in a mobilehome park that is exempt under subdivision (a) from any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure adopted by any local governmental entity that establishes a maximum amount that a landlord may charge a homeowner for rent, and notwithstanding any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure, a mobilehome park shall not be assessed any fee or other exaction for a park space that is exempt under subdivision (a) imposed pursuant to any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure. No other fee or other exaction shall be imposed for a park space that is exempt under subdivision (a) for the purpose of defraying the cost of administration thereof. (f) At the time the rental agreement is first offered to the homeowner, the management shall provide written notice to the homeowner of the homeowner's right (1) to have at least 30 days to inspect the rental agreement, and (2) to void the rental agreement by notifying management in writing within 72 hours of the acceptance of a rental agreement. The failure of the management to provide the 05/06/98 09:08:57 WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.Ieginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgat...docID=700655488+7+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve written notice shall make the rental agreement voidable at the homeowner's option upon the homeowner's discovery of the failure. The receipt of any written notice provided pursuant to this subdivision shall be acknowledged in writing by the homeowner. (g) No rental agreement subject to subdivision (a) that is first entered into on or after January 1, 1993, shall have a provision which authorizes automatic extension or renewal of, or automatically extends or renews, the rental agreement for a period beyond the initial stated term at the sole option of either the management or the homeowner. (h) This section does not apply to or supersede other provisions of this part or other state law. 798.18. (a) A homeowner shall be offered a rental agreement for (1) a term of 12 months, or (2) a lesser period as the homeowner may request, or (3) a longer period as mutually agreed upon by both the homeowner and management. (b) No rental agreement shall contain any terms or conditions with respect to charges for rent, utilities, or incidental reasonable service charges that would be different during the first 12 months of the rental agreement from the corresponding terms or conditions that would be offered to the homeowners on a month-to-month basis. (c) No rental agreement for a term of 12 months or less shall include any provision which authorizes automatic extension or renewal of, or automatically extends or renews, the rental agreement beyond the initial term for a term longer than 12 months at the sole option of either the management or the homeowner. 798.19. No rental agreement for a mobilehome shall contain a provision by which the homeowner waives his or her rights under the provisions of Articles 1 to 8, inclusive, of this chapter. Any such waiver shall be deemed contrary to public policy and void. 798.20. Membership in any private club or organization which is a condition for tenancy in a park shall not be denied on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, ancestry, or marital status. 798.21. (a) Notwithstanding Section 798.17, if a mobilehome space within a mobilehome park is not the principal residence of the homeowner and the homeowner has not rented the mobilehome to another party, it shall be exempt from any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure adopted by any city, county, or city and county, which establishes a maximum amount that the landlord may charge a tenant for rent. (b) Nothing in this section is intended to require any homeowner to disclose information concerning his or her personal finances. Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize management to gain access to any records which would otherwise be confidential or privileged. (c) For purposes of this section, a mobilehome shall be deemed to be the principal residence of the homeowner, unless a review of state or county records demonstrates that the homeowner is receiving a homeowner's exemption for another property or mobilehome in this 3 of 5 05/06/98 09:08:58 WAIS Document Retrieval 1111 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-binikat...docID=700655488+7+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve state. (d) Before modifying the rent or other terms of tenancy as a result of a review of state or county records, as described in subdivision (c), the management shall notify the homeowner, in writing, of the proposed changes and provide the homeowner with a copy of the documents upon which management relied. (e) The homeowner shall have 90 days from the date the notice described in subdivision (d) is mailed to review and respond to the notice. Management shall not modify the rent or other terms of tenancy prior to the expiration of the 90 -day period or prior to responding, in writing, to information provided by the homeowner. Management shall not modify the rent or other terms of tenancy if the homeowner provides documentation reasonably establishing that the information provided by management is incorrect or that the homeowner is not the same person identified in the documents. However, nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to authorize the homeowner to change the homeowner's exemption status of the other property or mobilehome owned by the homeowner. (f) This section shall not apply under any of the following conditions: (1) The homeowner is unable to rent or lease the mobilehome because the owner or management of the mobilehome park in which the mobilehome is located does not permit, or the rental agreement limits or prohibits, the assignment of the mobilehome or the subletting of the park space. (2) The mobilehome is being actively held available for sale by the homeowner, or pursuant to a listing agreement with a real estate broker licensed pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 10130) of Part 1 of Division 4 of the Business and Professions Code, or a mobilehome dealer, as defined in Section 18002.6 of the Health and Safety Code. (3) The legal owner has taken possession or ownership, or both, of the mobilehome from a registered owner through either a surrender of ownership interest by the registered owner or a foreclosure proceeding. 798.22. (a) In any new mobilehome park that is developed after January 1, 1982, mobilehome spaces shall not be rented for the accommodation of recreational vehicles as defined by Section 799.29 unless the mobilehome park has a specifically designated area within the park for recreational vehicles, which is separate and apart from the area designated for mobilehomes. Recreational vehicles may be located only in the specifically designated area. (b) Any new mobilehome park that is developed after January 1, 1982, is not subject to the provisions of this section until 75 percent of the spaces have been rented for the first time. 798.23. (a) The owner of the park, and any person employed by the park, shall be subject to, and comply with, all park rules and regulations, to the same extent as residents and their guests. (b) This section shall not apply to either of the following: (1) Any rule or regulation that governs the age of any resident or guest. (2) Acts of a park owner or park employee which are undertaken to fulfill a park owner's maintenance, management, and business operation responsibilities. (c) This section shall not affect in any way, either to validate or invalidate, nor does this section express a legislative policy 4 of 5 05/06/98 09:08:58 'WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/wai judgment in favor of or against, the enforcement of a park rule or regulation which prohibits or restricts the subletting of a mobilehome park space by a tenant. 5 of 5 05/06/98 09:08:58 WAIS Document Retrieval CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 798.24-798.29.5 http://www.Ieginfo.ca.gov/cgi-binat...docID=700655488+4+0+0&WAI Saction=retrieve 798.24. Each common area facility shall be open or available to residents at all reasonable hours and the hours of the common area facility shall be posted at the facility. No homeowner shall be required to obtain liability insurance in order to use common area facilities for the purposes specified in Section 798.51. 798.25. (a) When the management proposes an amendment to the park's rules and regulations, the management shall meet and consult with the homeowners in the park, their representatives, or both, after written notice has been given to all the homeowners in the park 10 days or more before the meeting. The notice shall set forth the proposed amendment to the park rules and regulations and shall state the date, time, and location of the meeting. (b) Following the meeting and consultation with the homeowners, the noticed amendment to the park rules and regulations may be implemented, as to any homeowner, with the consent of that homeowner, or without the homeowner's consent upon written notice of not less than six months, except for regulations applicable to recreational facilities, which may be amended without homeowner consent upon written notice of not less than 60 days. (c) Written notice to a homeowner whose tenancy commences within the required period of notice of a proposed amendment to the park's rules and regulations under subdivision (b) shall constitute compliance with this section where the written notice is given before the inception of the tenancy. 798.25.5. Any rule or regulation of a mobilehome park that (a) is unilaterally adopted by the management, (b) is implemented without the consent of the homeowners, and (c) by its terms purports to deny homeowners their right to a trial by jury or which would mandate binding arbitration of any dispute between the management and homeowners shall be void and unenforceable. 798.26. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), and notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the ownership or management of a park, subdivision, cooperative, or condominium for mobilehomes shall have no right of entry to a mobilehome without the prior written consent of the resident. Such consent may be revoked in writing by the resident at any time. The ownership or management shall have a right of entry upon the land upon which a mobilehome is situated for maintenance of utilities, for maintenance of the premises in accordance with the rules and regulations of the park when the homeowner or resident fails to so maintain the premises, and protection of the mobilehome park, subdivision, cooperative, or condominium at any reasonable time, but not in a manner or at a time which would interfere with the resident' s quiet enjoyment. (b) The ownership or management of a park, subdivision, cooperative, or condominium for mobilehomes may enter a mobilehome 1 of 2 05/06/98 09:10:09 WAIS Document Retrieval • http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/w11 a..docID=700655488+4+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve without the prior written consent of the resident in case of an emergency or when the resident has abandoned the mobilehome. 798.27. (a) The management shall give written notice to all homeowners and prospective homeowners concerning the following matters: (1) the nature of the zoning or use permit under which the mobilehome park operates. If the mobilehome park is operating pursuant to a permit subject to a renewal or expiration date, the relevant information and dates shall be included in the notice. (2) The duration of any lease of the mobilehome park, or any portion thereof, in which the management is a lessee. (b) If a change occurs concerning the zoning or use permit under which the park operates or a lease in which the management is a lessee, all homeowners shall be given written notice within 30 days of that change. Notification regarding the change of use of the park, or any portion thereof, shall be governed by subdivision (g) of Section 798.56. A prospective homeowner shall be notified prior to the inception of the tenancy. 798.28. The management of a mobilehome park shall disclose, in writing, the name , business address, and business telephone number of the"mobilehome park owner upon the request of a homeowner. 798.285. The management may cause the removal, pursuant to Section 22658 of the Vehicle Code, of a vehicle other than a mobilehome which is parked in the park when there is displayed a sign at each entrance to the park as provided in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 22658 of the Vehicle Code. 798.29. The management shall post a mobilehome ombudsman sign provided by the Department of Housing and Community Development, as required by Section 18253.5 of the Health and Safety Code. 798.29.5. The management shall provide, by posting notice on the mobilehomes of all affected homeowners and residents, at least 72 hours' written advance notice of an interruption in utility service of more than two hours for the maintenance, repair, or replacement of facilities of utility systems over which the management has control within the park, provided that the interruption is not due to an emergency. The management shall be liable only for actual damages sustained by a homeowner or resident for violation of this section. "Emergency," for purposes of this section, means the interruption of utility service resulting from an accident or act of nature, or cessation of service caused by other than the management's regular or planned maintenance, repair, or replacement of utility facilities. 2 of 2 05/06/98 09:10:10 WAIS Document Retrieval CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 798.30-798.43 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bi.gat...docID=700655488+2+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve 798.30. The management shall give a homeowner written notice of any increase in his or her rent at least 90 days before the date of the increase. 798.31. A homeowner shall not be charged a fee for other than rent, utilities, and incidental reasonable charges for services actually rendered. A homeowner shall not be charged a fee for obtaining a lease on a mobilehome lot for (1) a term of 12 months, or (2) a lesser period as the homeowner may request. A fee may be charged for a lease of more than one year if the fee is mutually agreed upon by both the homeowner and management. 798.32. (a) A homeowner shall not be charged a fee for services actually rendered which are not listed in the rental agreement unless he or she has been given written notice thereof by the management, at least 60 days before imposition of the charge. (b) Those fees and charges specified in subdivision (a) shall be separately stated on any monthly or other periodic billing to the homeowner. If the fee or charge has a limited duration or is amortized for a specified period, the expiration date shall be stated on the initial notice and each subsequent billing to the homeowner while the fee or charge is billed to the homeowner. 798.33. (a) A homeowner shall not be charged a fee for keeping a pet in the park unless the management actually provides special facilities or services for pets. If special pet facilities are maintained by the management, the fee charged shall reasonably relate to the cost of maintenance of the facilities or services and the number of pets kept in the park. (b) If the management of a mobilehome park implements a rule or regulation prohibiting residents from keeping pets in the park, the new rule or regulation shall not apply to prohibit the residents from continuing to keep the pets currently in the park if the pet otherwise conforms with the previous park rules or regulations relating to pets. However, if the pet dies or no longer lives with the resident, the resident does not have the right to replace the pet (c) Any rule or regulation prohibiting residents from keeping pets in the mobilehome park_shall not apply to guide dogs, signal dogs, or service dogs. 798.34. (a) A homeowner shall not be charged a fee for a guest who does not stay with him or her for more than a total of 20 consecutive days or a total of 30 days in a calendar year. A person who is a guest, as described in this subdivision, shall not be required to register with the management. (b) A homeowner who is living alone and who wishes to share his or 1 of 5 05/06/98 09:06:07 WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgat...docID=700655488+2+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve her mobilehome with one person may do so, and a fee shall not be imposed by management for that person. The person shall be considered a guest of the homeowner and any agreement between the homeowner and the person shall not change the terms and conditions of the rental agreement between management and the homeowner. The guest shall comply with the provisions of the rules and regulations of the mobilehome park. (c) A senior homeowner may share his or her mobilehome with any person over 18 years of age if that person is providing live-in health care or live-in supportive care to the homeowner pursuant to a written treatment plan prepared by the homeowner's physician. A fee shall not be charged by management for that person. That person shall have no rights of tenancy in the park, and any agreement between the homeowner and the person shall not change the terms and conditions of the rental agreement between management and the homeowner. That person shall comply with the rules and regulations of the mobilehome park. As used in this subdivision, "senior homeowner" means a homeowner who is 55 years of age or older. (d) A senior homeowner who resides in a mobilehome park that has implemented rules or regulations limiting residency based on age requirements for housing for older persons, pursuant to Section 798.76, may share his or her mobilehome with any person over 18 years of age if this person is a parent, sibling, child, or grandchild of the senior homeowner and requires live-in health care, live-in supportive care, or supervision pursuant to a written treatment plan prepared by a physician and surgeon. Management may not charge a fee for this person. Any agreement between the senior homeowner and this person shall not change the terms and conditions of the rental agreement between management and the senior homeowner. Unless otherwise agreed upon, park management shall not be required to manage, supervise, or provide for this person's care during his or her stay in the mobilehome park. This person shall have no rights of tenancy in the park, but shall comply with the rules and regulations of the mobilehome park. A violation of the mobilehome park rules and regulations by this person shall be deemed a violation of the rules and regulations by the homeowner pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 798.56. As used in this subdivision, "senior homeowner" means a homeowner who is 55 years of age or older. 798.35. A homeowner shall not be charged a fee based on the number of members in his or her immediate family. As used in this section, the "immediate family" shall be limited to the homeowner, his or her spouse, their parents, their children, and their grandchildren under 18 years of age. 798.36. A homeowner shall not be charged a fee for the enforcement of any of the rules and regulations of the park, except a reasonable fee may be charged by management for the maintenance of the land and premises upon which the mobilehome is situated in the event the homeowner fails to do so in accordance with the rules and regulations of the park after written notification to the homeowner and the failure of the homeowner to comply within 14 days. The written notice shall state the specific condition to be corrected and an estimate of the charges to be imposed by management if the services are performed by management or its agent. 798.37. A homeowner shall not be charged a fee for the entry, installation, hookup, or landscaping as a condition of tenancy 2 of 5 05/06/98 09:06:08 WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bingat...docID=700655488+2+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve except for an actual fee or cost imposed by a local governmental ordinance or requirement directly related to the occupancy of the specific site upon which the mobilehome is located and not incurred as a portion of the development of the mobilehome park as a whole. However, reasonable landscaping and maintenance requirements may be included in the park rules and regulations. The management shall not require a homeowner or prospective homeowner to purchase, rent, or lease goods or services for landscaping from any person, company, or corporation. 798.38. Where the management provides both master meter and submeter service of utilities to a homeowner, for each billing period the cost of the charges for the period shall be separately stated along with the opening and closing readings for his meter. The management shall post in a conspicuous place, the prevailing residential utilities rate schedule as published by the serving utility. 798.39. (a) The management may only demand a security deposit on or before initial occupancy and the security deposit may not be in an amount or value in excess of an amount equal to two months' rent that is charged at the inception of the occupancy, in addition to any rent for the first month. In no event shall additional security deposits be demanded of a homeowner following the initial occupancy. (b) As to all security deposits collected on or after January 1, 1989, after the homeowner has promptly paid to the management within five days of the date the amount is due, all of the rent, utilities, and reasonable service charges for any 12 -consecutive -month period subsequent to the collection of the security deposit by the management, or upon resale of the mobilehome, whichever occurs earlier, the management shall, upon the receipt of a written request from the homeowner, refund to the homeowner the amount of the security deposit within 30 days following the end of the 12 -consecutive -month period of the prompt payment or the date of the resale of the mobilehome. (c) As to all security deposits collected prior to January 1, 1989, in the event that the mobilehome park is sold or transferred to any other party or entity, the selling park owner shall deposit in escrow an amount equal to all security deposits that the park owner holds. The seller's escrow instructions shall direct that, upon close of escrow, the security deposits therein that were held by the selling park owner (including the period in escrow) for 12 months or more, shall be disbursed to the persons who paid the deposits to the selling park owner and promptly paid, within five days of the date the amount is due, all rent, utilities, and reasonable service charges for the 12 -month period preceding the close of escrow. (d) Any and all security deposits in escrow that were held by the selling park owner that are not required to be disbursed pursuant to subdivision (b) or (c) shall be disbursed to the successors in interest to the selling or transferring park owner, who shall have the same obligations of the park's management and ownership specified in this section with respect to security deposits. The disbursal may be made in escrow by a debit against the selling park owner and a credit to the successors in interest to the selling park owner. (e) The management shall not be required to place any security deposit collected in an interest-bearing account or to provide a homeowner with any interest on the security deposit collected. (f) Nothing in this section shall affect the validity of title to 3 of 5 05/06/98 09:06:08 • WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgat...docID=700655488+2+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve real property transferred in violation of this section. 798.40. The management shall not acquire a lien or security interest, other than an interest arising by reason of process issued to enforce a judgment of any court, in a mobilehome located in the park unless it is mutually agreed upon by both the homeowner and management. Any billing and payment upon the obligation shall be kept separate from current rent. 798.41. (a) Where a rental agreement, including a rental agreement specified in Section 798.17, does not specifically provide otherwise, the park management may elect to bill a homeowner separately for utility service fees and charges assessed by the utility for services provided to or for spaces in the park. Any separately billed utility fees and charges shall not be deemed to be included in the rent charged for those spaces under the rental agreement, and shall not be deemed to be rent or a rent increase for purposes of any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure adopted or enforced by any local governmental entity which establishes a maximum amount that a landlord may charge a tenant for rent, provided that at the timeof the initial separate billing of any utility fees and charges the rent chargeable under the rental agreement or the base rent chargeable under the terms of a local rent control provision is simultaneously reduced by an amount equal to the fees and charges separately billed. The amount of this reduction shall be equal to the average amount charged to the park management for that utility service for that space during the 12 months immediately preceding notice of the commencement of the separate billing for that utility service. Utility services liquid propane gas, refuse service, and (b) This section prior to January 1, date. (c) Nothing in this section shall require rental agreements to provide for separate billing to homeowners of fees and charges specified in subdivision (a). (d) Those fees and charges specified in subdivision (a) shall be separately stated on any monthly or other periodic billing to the homeowner. If the fee or charge has a limited duration or is amortized for a specified period, the e$piration date shall be stated on the initial notice and each subsequent billing to the homeowner while the fee or charge is billed to the homeowner. to which this section applies are natural gas or electricity, water, cable television, garbage or sewer service. does not apply to rental agreements entered into 1991, until extended or renewed on or after that 798.42. (a) The management shall not charge or impose upon a homeowner any fee or increase in rent which reflects the cost to the management of any fine, forfeiture, penalty, money damages, or fee assessed or awarded by a court of law against the management for a violation of this chapter, including any attorney's fees and costs incurred by the management in connection therewith. (b) A court shall consider the remoteness in time of the assessment or award against the management of any fine, forfeiture, penalty, money damages, or fee in determining whether the homeowner has met the burden of proof that the fee or increase in rent is in violation of this section. (c) Any provision ina rental agreement entered into, renewed, or 4 of 5 05/06/98 09:06:08 WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bindlOgat...docID=700655488+2+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve modified on or after January 1, 1995, that permits a fee or increase in rent that reflects the cost to the management of any money damages awarded against the management for a violation of this chapter shall be void. 798.43. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), whenever a homeowner is responsible for payment of gas, water, or electric utility service, management shall disclose to the homeowner any condition by which a gas, water, or electric meter on the homeowner's site measures gas, water, or electric service for common area facilities or equipment, including lighting, provided that management has knowledge of the condition. Management shall disclose this information prior to the inception of the tenancy or upon discovery and shall complete either of the following: (1) Enter into a mutual written agreement with the homeowner for compensation by management for the cost of the portion of the service measured by the homeowner's meter for the common area facilities or equipment to the extent that this cost accrues on or after January 1, 1991 (2) Discontinue using the meter on the homeowner's site for the utility service to the common area facilities and equipment. (b) On and after January 1, 1994, if the electric meter on the homeowner's site measures electricity for lighting mandated by Section 18602 of the Health and Safety Code and this lighting provides lighting for the homeowner's site, management shall be required to comply with subdivision (a). 5 of 5 05/06/98 09:06:08 WAIS Document Retrieval CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 798.45-798.49 http://www.Ieginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgat...docID=700655488+8+0+0&WAI Saction=retrieve 798.45. Notwithstanding Section 798.17, "new construction" as defined in Section 798.7, shall be exempt from any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure adopted by any city, county, or city and county, which establishes a maximum amount that a landlord may charge a tenant for rent. 798.49. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (d), the local agency of any city, including a charter city, county, or city and county, which administers an ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure that establishes a maximum amount that management may charge a tenant for rent shall permit the management to separately charge a homeowner for any of the following: (1) The amount of any fee, assessment or other charge first imposed by a city, including a charter city, a county, a city and county, the state, or the federal government on or after January 1, 1995, upon the space rented by the homeowner. (2) The amount of any increase on or after January 1, 1995, in an existing fee, assessment or other charge imposed by any governmental entity upon the space rented by the homeowner. (3) The amount of any fee, assessment or other charge upon the space first imposed or increased on or after January 1, 1993, pursuant to any state or locally mandated program relating to housing contained in the Health and Safety Code. (b) If management has charged the homeowner for a fee, assessment, or other charge specified in subdivision (a) that was increased or first imposed on or after January 1, 1993, and the fee, assessment, or other charge is decreased or eliminated thereafter, the charge to the homeowner shall be decreased or eliminated accordingly. (c) The amount of the fee, assessment or other charges authorized by subdivision (a) shall be separately stated on any billing to the homeowner. Any change in the amount of the fee, assessment, or other charges that are separately billed pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be considered when determining any rental adjustment under the local ordinance. (d) This section shall not apply to any of the following: (1) Those fees, assessments, or charges imposed pursuant to the Mobilehome Parks Act (Part 2.1 (commencing with Section 18200) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code), unless specifically authorized by Section 18502 of the Health and Safety Code. (2) Those costs that are imposed on management by a court pursuant to Section 798.42. (3) Any fee or other exaction imposed upon management for the specific purpose of defraying the cost of administration of any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure that establishes a maximum amount that management may charge a tenant for rent. (4) Any tax imposed upon the property by a city, including a charter city, county, or city and county. (e) Those fees and charges specified in subdivision (a) shall be separately stated on any monthly or other periodic billing to the homeowner. If the fee or charge has a limited duration or is amortized for a specified period, the expiration date shall be stated on the initial notice and each subsequent billing to the homeowner while the fee or charge is billed to the homeowner. 1 of 2 05/06/98 09:11:33 WAIS Document Retrieval CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 798.50-798.52 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin.at...docID=700655488+5+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve, 798.50. It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this article to ensure that homeowners and residents of mobilehome parks have the right to peacefully assemble and freely communicate with one another and with others with respect to mobilehome living or for social or educational purposes. 798.51. No provision contained in any mobilehome park rental agreement, rule, or regulation shall deny or prohibit the right of any homeowner or resident in the park to do any of the following: (a) Peacefully assemble or meet in the park, at reasonable hours and in a reasonable manner, for any lawful purpose. Meetings may be held in the park community or recreation hall or clubhouse when the facility is not otherwise in use, and, with the consent of the homeowner, in any mobilehome within the park. (b) Invite public officials, candidates for public office, or representatives of mobilehome owner organizations to meet with homeowners and residents and speak upon matters of public interest, in accordance with Section 798.50. (c) Canvass and petition homeowners and residents for noncommercial purposes relating to mobilehome living, election to public office, or the initiative, referendum, or recall processes, at reasonable hours and in a reasonable manner, including the distribution or circulation of information. 798.52. Any homeowner or resident who is prevented by management from exercising the rights provided for in Section 798.51 may bring an action in a court of law to enjoin enforcement of any rule, regulation, or other policy which unreasonably deprives a homeowner or resident of those rights. 1 of 1 05/06/98 09:12:06 'WAIS Document Retrieval CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 798.53 • http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/wai.ocID=700655488+10+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve 798.53. The management shall meet and consult with the homeowners, upon written request, within 30 days of the request, either individually, collectively, or with representatives of a group of homeowners who have signed a request to be so represented on the following matters: (a) Resident concerns regarding existing park rules that are not subject to Section 798.25. (b) Standards for maintenance of physical improvements in the park. (c) Addition, alteration, or deletion of service, equipment, or physical improvements. (d) Rental agreements offered pursuant to Section 798.17. Any collective meeting shall be conducted only after notice thereof has been given to all the requesting homeowners 10 days or more before the meeting. ± 's 1 of 1 05/06/98 09:15:15 WAIS Document Retrieval CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 798.55-798.61 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bi.at...docID700655488+6+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve, 798.55. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that, because of the high cost of moving mobilehomes, the potential for damage resulting therefrom, the requirements relating to the installation of mobilehomes, and the cost of landscaping or lot preparation, it is necessary that the owners of mobilehomes occupied within mobilehome parks be provided with the unique protection from actual or constructive eviction afforded by the provisions of this chapter. (b) The management shall not terminate or refuse to renew a tenancy, except for a reason specified in this article and upon the giving of written notice to the homeowner in the manner prescribed by Section 1162 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to remove the mobilehome from the park within a period of not less than 60 days, which period shall be specified in the notice. A copy of this notice shall be sent to the legal owner, as defined in Section 18005.8 of the Health and Safety Code, each junior lienholder, as defined in Section 18005.3 of the Health and Safety Code, and the registered owner of the mobilehome, if other than the homeowner, by United States mail within 10 days after notice to the homeowner. The copy may be sent by regular mail or by certified or registered mail with return receipt requested, at the option of the management. If the homeowner has not paid the rent due within three days after notice to the homeowner, and if the first notice was not sent by certified or registered mail with return receipt requested, a copy of the notice shall again be sent to the legal owner, each junior lienholder, and the registered owner, if other than the homeowner, by certified or registered mail with return receipt requested within 10 days after notice to the homeowner. Copies of the notice shall be addressed to the legal owner, each junior lienholder, and the registered owner at their addresses, as set forth in the registration card specified in Section 18091.5 of the Health and Safety Code. 798.56. A tenancy shall be terminated by the management only for one or more of the following reasons: (a) Failure of the homeowner or resident to comply with a local ordinance or state law or regulation relating to mobilehomes within a reasonable time after the homeowner receives a notice of noncompliance from the appropriate governmental agency. (b) Conduct by the homeowner or resident, upon the park premises, which constitutes a substantial annoyance to other homeowners or residents. (c) Conviction of the homeowner or resident for prostitution or a felony controlled substance offense if the act resulting in the conviction was committed anywhere on the premises of the mobilehome park, including, but not limited to, within the homeowner's mobilehome. However the tenancy may not be terminated for the reason specified in this subdivision if the person convicted of the offense has permanently vacated, and does not subsequently reoccupy, the mobilehome. (d) Failure of the homeowner or resident to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation of the park which is part of the rental agreement or any amendment thereto. No act or omission of the homeowner or resident shall constitute a 1 of 6 05/06/98 09:12:55 WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.Ieginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/wai.docID=700655488+6+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve failure to comply with a reasonable rule or regulation unless and until the management has given the homeowner written notice of the alleged rule or regulation violation and the homeowner or resident has failed to adhere to the rule or regulation within seven days. However, if a homeowner has been given a written notice of an alleged violation of the same rule or regulation on three or more occasions within a 12 -month period after the homeowner or resident has violated that rule or regulation, no written notice shall be required for a subsequent violation of the same rule or regulation. Nothing in this subdivision shall relieve the management from its obligation to demonstrate that a rule or regulation has in fact been violated. (e) (1) Nonpayment of rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges; provided that the amount due has 'been unpaid for a period of at least five days from its due date, and provided, that the homeowner shall be given a three-day written notice subsequent to that five-day period to pay the amount due or to vacate the tenancy. For purposes of this subdivision, the five-day period does not include the date the payment is due. The three-day written notice shall be given to the homeowner in the manner prescribed by Section 1162 of the Code of Civil Procedure. A copy of this notice shall be sent to the persons or entities specified in subdivision (b) of Section 798.55 within 10 days after notice is delivered to the homeowner. If the homeowner cures the default, the notice need not be sent. The notice may be given at the same time as the 60 days' notice required for termination of the tenancy. (2) Payment by the homeowner prior to the expiration of the three-day notice period shall cure a default under this subdivision. In the event the homeowner does not pay prior to the expiration of the three-day notice period, the homeowner shall remain liable for all payments due up until the time the tenancy is vacated. (3) Payment by the legal owner, as defined in Section 18005.8 of the Health and Safety Code, any junior lienholder, as defined in Section 18005.3 of the Health and Safety Code, or the registered owner, as defined in Section 18009.5 of the Health and Safety Code, if other than the homeowner, on behalf of the homeowner prior to the expiration of 30 calendar days following the mailing of the notice to the legal owner, each junior lienholder, and the registered owner provided in subdivision (b) of Section 798.55, shall cure a default under this subdivision with respect to that payment. (4) Cure of a default of rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges by the legal owner, any junior lienholder, or the registered owner, if other than the homeowner, as provided by this subdivision, may not be exercised more than twice during a 12 -month period. (5) If a homeowner has been given a three-day notice to pay the amount due or to vacate the tenancy on three or more occasions within the preceding 12 -month period, no written three-day notice shall be required in the case of a subsequent nonpayment of rent, utility charges, or reasonable incidental service charges. In that event the management shall give written notice to the homeowner in the manner prescribed by Section 1162 of the Code of Civil Procedure to remove the mobilehome from the park within a period of not less than 60 days, which period shall be specified in the notice. A copy of this notice shall be sent to the legal owner, each junior lienholder, and the registered owner of the mobilehome, if other than the homeowner, as specified in paragraph (b) of Section 798.55, by certified or registered mail return receipt requested within 10 days after notice is sent to the homeowner. (f) Condemnation of the park. (g) Change of use of the park or any portion thereof, provided: (1) The management gives the homeowners at least 15 days' written 2 of 6 05/06/98 09:12:55 WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-binkat...docID=700655488+6+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve. notice that the management will be appearing before a local governmental board, commission, or body to request permits for a change of use of the mobilehome park. (2) After all required permits requesting a change of use have been approved by the local governmental board, commission, or body, the management shall give the homeowners six months' or more written notice of termination of tenancy. If the change of use requires no local governmental permits, then notice shall be given 12 months or more prior to the management's determination that a change of use will occur. The management in the notice shall disclose and describe in detail the nature of the change of use. (3) The management gives each proposed homeowner written notice thereof prior to the inception of his or her tenancy that the management is requesting a change of use before local governmental bodies or that a change of use request has been granted. (4) The notice requirements for termination of tenancy set forth in Sections 798.56 and 798.57 shall be followed if the proposed change actually occurs. (5) A notice of a proposed change of use given prior to January 1, 1980, which conforms to the requirements in effect at that time shall be valid. The requirements for a notice of a proposed change of use imposed by this subdivision shall be governed by the law in effect at the time the notice was given. (h) The report required pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (i) of Section 65863.7 of the Government Code shall be given to the homeowners or residents at the same time that notice is required pursuant to subdivision (g) of this section. 798.56a. (a) Within 60 days after receipt of, or no later than 65 days after the mailing of, the notice of termination of tenancy pursuant to any reason provided in Section 798.56, the legal owner and each junior lienholder shall notify the management in writing of at least one of the following: (1) Its offer to sell the obligation secured by the mobilehome to the management for the amount specified in its written offer. In that event, the management shall have 15 days following receipt of the offer to accept or reject the offer in writing. If the offer is rejected, the person or entity that made the offer shall have 10 days in which to exercise one of the other options contained in this section and shall notify management in writing of its choice. (2) Its intention to foreclose on its security interest in the mobilehome. (3) Its request that the management pursue the termination of tenancy against the homeowner and its offer to reimburse management for the reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred by the management in that action. If this request and offer are made, the legal owner or junior lienholder shall reimburse the management the amount of reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, as agreed upon by the management and the legal owner or junior lienholder, incurred by the management in an action to terminate the homeowner's tenancy, on or before the earlier of (A) the 60th calendar day following receipt of written notice from the management of the aggregate amount of those reasonable attorney's fees and costs or (B) the date the mobilehome is resold. (b) A legal owner or junior lienholder may sell the mobilehome within the park to a third party and keep the mobilehome on the site within the mobilehome park until it is resold only if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The legal owner or junior lienholder notifies management in writing of the intention to exercise either option described in 3 of 6 05/06/98 09:12:56 WAIS Document Retrieval • http://www.Ieginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waiss....docID=700655488+6+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) within 60 days following receipt of, or no later than 65 days after the mailing of, the notice of termination of tenancy and satisfies all of the responsibilities and liabilities of the homeowner owing to the management for the 90 days preceding the mailing of the notice of termination of tenancy and then continues to satisfy these responsibilities and liabilities as they accrue from the date of the mailing of that notice until the date the mobilehome is resold. (2) Within 60 days following receipt of, or no later than 65 days after the mailing of, the notice of termination of tenancy, the legal owner or junior lienholder commences all repairs and necessary corrective actions so that the mobilehome complies with park rules and regulations in existence at the time the notice of termination of tenancy was given as well as the health and safety standards specified in Sections 18550, 18552, and 18605 of the Health and Safety Code, and completes these repairs and corrective actions within 90 calendar days of that notice, or before the date that the mobilehome is sold, whichever is earlier. (3) The legal owner or junior lienholder complies with the requirements of Article 7 (commencing with Section 798.70) as it relates to the transfer of the mobilehome to a third party. (c) For purposes of subdivision (a), the "homeowner's responsibilities and liabilities" means all rents, utilities, reasonable maintenance charges of the mobilehome and its premises, and reasonable maintenance of the mobilehome and its premises pursuant to existing park rules and regulations. (d) In the event the homeowner files for bankruptcy, the periods set forth in this section are tolled until the mobilehome is released from bankruptcy. (e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including, but not limited to, Section 18099.5 of the Health and Safety Code, in the event neither the legal owner nor a junior lienholder, if any, notifies the management of its decision pursuant to subdivision (a) within the period allowed, or performs as agreed within 30 days, the management may either remove the mobilehome from the premises and place it in storage or store it on its site. In this case, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the management shall have a warehouseman's lien in accordance with Section 7209 of the Commercial Code against the mobilehome for the costs of dismantling and moving, if appropriate, as well as storage, which shall be superior to all other liens, except the lien provided for in Section 18116.1 of the Health and Safety Code, and may enforce the lien pursuant to Section 7210 of the Commercial Code. (f) A11 written notices required by this section shall be sent to the other party by certified or registered mail with return receipt requested. (g) Satisfaction, pursuant to this section, of the homeowner's accrued or accruing responsibilities and liabilities shall not cure the default of the homeowner. 798.57. The management shall set forth in a notice of termination, the reason relied upon for the termination with specific facts to permit determination of the date, place, witnesses, and circumstances concerning that reason. Neither reference to the section number or a subdivision thereof, nor a recital of the language of this article will constitute compliance with this section. 798.58. No tenancy shall be terminated for the purpose of making a 4 of 6 05/06/98 09:12:56 WAIS Document Retrieval • http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bimikat...docID=700655488+6+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve, homeowner's site available for a person who purchased a mobilehome from the owner of the park or his agent. 798.59. A homeowner shall give written notice to the management of not less than 60 days before vacating his or her tenancy. 798.60. The provisions of this article shall not affect any rights or proceedings set forth in Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1159) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure except as otherwise provided herein. 798.61. (a) (1) As used in this section, "abandoned mobilehome" means a mobilehome about which all of the following are true: (A) It is located in a mobilehome park on a site for which no rent has been paid to the management for the preceding 60 days. (B) It is unoccupied. (C) A reasonable person would believe it to be abandoned. (2) For purposes of this section: (A) "Mobilehome" shall include a trailer coach, as defined in Section 635 of the Vehicle Code, or a recreational vehicle, as defined in Section 18010 of the Health and Safety Code, if the trailer coach or recreational vehicle also satisfies the requirements of paragraph (1), including being located on any site within a mobilehome park, even if the site is in a separate designated section pursuant to Section 18215 of the Health and Safety Code. (B) "Abandoned mobilehome" shall include a mobilehome which is uninhabitable because of its total or partial destruction which cannot be rehabilitated, if the mobilehome also satisfies the requirements of paragraph (1). (b) After determining a mobilehome in a mobilehome park to be an abandoned mobilehome, the management shall post a notice of belief of abandonment on the mobilehome for not less than 30 days, and shall deposit copies of the notice in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the homeowner at the last known address and to any known registered owner, if different from the homeowner, and to any known holder of a security interest in the abandoned mobilehome. This notice shall be mailed by registered or certified mail with a return receipt requested. (c) Thirty or more days following posting pursuant to subdivision (b), the management may file a petition in the municipal or justice court for the judicial district in which the mobilehome park is located for a judicial declaration of abandonment of the mobilehome. Copies of the petition shall be served upon the homeowner, any known registered owner, and any known person having a lien or security interest of record in the mobilehome by posting a copy on the mobilehome and mailing copies to those persons at their last known addresses by registered or certified mail with a return receipt requested in the United States mail, postage prepaid. (d) (1) Hearing on the petition shall be given precedence over other matters on the court's calendar. (2) If, at the hearing, the petitioner shows by a preponderance of the evidence that the criteria for an abandoned mobilehome has been satisfied and no party establishes an interest therein at the hearing, the court shall enter a judgment of abandonment, determine the amount of charges to which the petitioner is entitled, and award attorney's fees and costs to the petitioner. For purposes of this subdivision an interest in the mobilehome shall be established by 4. 5 of 6 05/06/98 09:12:56 WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.Ieginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgat...docID=700655488+6+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve evidence of a right to possession of the mobilehome or a security or ownership interest in the mobilehome. (3) A default may be entered by the court clerk upon request of the petitioner, and a default judgment shall be thereupon entered, if no responsive pleading is filed within 15 days after service of the petition by mail. (e) (1) Within 10 days following a judgment of abandonment, the management shall enter the abandoned mobilehome and complete an inventory of the contents and submit the inventory to the court. (2) During this period the management shall post and mail notice of intent to sell the abandoned mobilehome and its contents under this section, and announcing the date of sale, in the same manner as provided for the notice of determination of abandonment under subdivision (b). (3) At any time prior to sale of a mobilehome under this section, any person having a right to possession of the mobilehome may recover and remove it from the premises upon payment to the management of all rent or other charges due, including reasonable costs of storage and other costs awarded by the court. Upon receipt of this payment and removal of the mobilehome from the premises pursuant to this paragraph, the management shall immediately file an acknowledgment of satisfaction of judgment pursuant to Section 724.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (f) Following the judgment of abandonment, but not less than 10 days following the notice of sale specified in subdivision (e), the management may conduct a public sale of the abandoned mobilehome and its contents. The management may bid at the sale and shall have the right to offset its bids to the extent of the total amount due it under this section. The proceeds of the sale shall be retained by the management, but any unclaimed amount thus retained over and above the amount to which the management is entitled under this section shall be deemed abandoned property and shall be paid into the treasury of the county in which the sale took place within 30 days of the date of the sale. The former homeowner or any other owner may claim any or all of that unclaimed amount within one year from the date of payment to the county by making application to the county treasurer or other official designated by the county. If the county pays any or all of that unclaimed amount to a claimant, neither the county nor any officer or employee of the county is liable to any other claimant as to the amount paid. (g) Within 30 days of the date of the sale, the management shall submit to the court an accounting of the moneys received from the sale and the disposition of the money and the items contained in the inventory submitted to the court pursuant to subdivision (e). (h) The management shall provide the purchaser at the sale with a copy of the judgment of abandonment and evidence of the sale, as shall be specified by the State Department of Housing and Community Development or the Department of Motor Vehicles, which shall register title in the abandoned mobilehome to the purchaser upon presentation thereof. The sale shall pass title to the purchaser free of any prior interest, including any security interest or lien, except the lien provided for in Section 18116.1 of the Health and Safety Code, in the abandoned mobilehome. 6 of 6 05/06/98 09:12:57 WAIS Document Retrieval CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 798.70-798.83 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin.at...docID=700655488+1+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve, 798.70. A homeowner, an heir, joint tenant, or personal representative of the estate who gains ownership of a mobilehome in the mobilehome park through the death of the owner of the mobilehome who was a homeowner at the time of his or her death, or the agent of any such person, may advertise the sale or exchange of his or her mobilehome, or, if not prohibited by the terms of an agreement with the management, may advertise the rental of his or her mobilehome, by displaying a sign in the window of the mobilehome, or by a sign posted on the side of the mobilehome facing the street, or by a sign in front of the mobilehome facing the street, stating that the mobilehome is for sale or exchange or, if not prohibited, for rent by the owner of the mobilehome or his or her agent. Any such person also may display a sign conforming to these requirements indicating that the mobilehome is on display for an "open house," unless the park rules prohibit the display of an open house sign. The sign shall state the name, address, and telephone number of the owner of the mobilehome or his or her agent and the sign face shall not exceed 24 inches in width and 36 inches in height. Signs posted in front of a mobilehome pursuant to this section may be of an H -frame or A -frame design with the sign face perpendicular to, but not extending into, the street. Homeowners may attach to the sign or their mobilehome tubes or holders for leaflets which provide information on the mobilehome for sale, exchange, or rent. 798.71. (a) The management shall not show or list for sale a manufactured home or mobilehome without first obtaining the owner's written authorization. The authorization shall specify the terms and conditions regarding the showing or listing. (b) The management shall prohibit neither the listing nor the sale of a manufactured home or mobilehome within the park by the homeowner, an heir, joint tenant, or personal representative of the estate who gains ownership of a mobilehome in the mobilehome park through the death of the owner of the mobilehome who was a homeowner at the time of his or her death, or the agent of any such person other than the management, nor require the selling homeowner, or an heir, joint tenant, or personal representative of the estate who gains ownership of a mobilehome in the mobilehome park through the death of the owner of the mobilehome who was a homeowner at the time of his or her death, to authorize the management to act as the agent in the sale of a manufactured home or mobilehome as a condition of management's approval of the buyer or prospective homeowner for residency in the park. Nothing in this section shall be construed as affecting the provisions of the Health and Safety Code governing the licensing of manufactured home or mobilehome salespersons or dealers. 798.72. (a) The management shall not charge a homeowner, an heir, joint tenant, or personal representative of the estate who gains ownership of a mobilehome in the mobilehome park through the death of the owner of the mobilehome who was a homeowner at the time of his or her death, or the agent of any such person a transfer or selling fee as a condition of a sale of his mobilehome within a park unless 1 of 6 05/06/98 09:03:59 WAIS Document Retrieval • http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/wai t...docID=700655488+1+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve the management performs a service in the sale. The management shall not perform any such service in connection with the sale unless so requested, in writing, by the homeowner, an heir, joint tenant, or personal representative of the estate who gains ownership of a mobilehome in the mobilehome park through the death of the owner of the mobilehome who was a homeowner at the time of his or her death, or the agent of any such person. (b) The management shall not charge a prospective homeowner or his or her agent, upon purchase of a mobilehome, a fee as a condition of approval for residency in a park unless the management performs a specific service in the sale. The management shall not impose a fee, other than for a credit check in accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 798.74, for an interview of a prospective homeowner. 798.73. The management shall not require the removal of a mobilehome from the park in the event of its sale to a third party during the term of the homeowner's rental agreement. However, in the event of a sale to a third party, in order to upgrade the quality of the park, the management may require that a mobilehome be removed from the park where: (a) It is not a "mobilehome" within the meaning of Section 798.3. (b) It is more than 20 years old, or more than 25 years old if manufactured after September 15, 1971, and is 20 feet wide or more, and the mobilehome does not comply with the health and safety standards provided in Sections 18550, 18552, and 18605 of the Health and Safety Code and the regulations established thereunder, as determined following an inspection by the appropriate enforcement agency, as defined in Section 18207 of the Health and Safety Code. (c) The mobilehome is more than 17 years old, or more than 25 years old if manufactured after September 15, 1971, and is less than 20 feet wide, and the mobilehome does not comply with the construction and safety standards under Sections 18550, 18552, and 18605 of the Health and Safety Code and the regulations established thereunder, as determined following an inspection by the appropriate enforcement agency, as defined in Section 18207 of the Health and Safety Code. (d) It is in a significantly rundown condition or in disrepair, as determined by the general condition of the mobilehome and its acceptability to the health and safety of the occupants and to the public, exclusive of its age. The management shall use reasonable discretion in determining the general condition of the mobilehome and its accessory structures. The management shall bear the burden of demonstrating that the mobilehome is in a significantly rundown condition or in disrepair. The management of the park shall not require repairs or improvements to the park space or property owned by the management, except for damage caused by the actions or negligence of the homeowner or an agent of the homeowner. 798.74. (a) The management may require the right of prior approval of a purchaser of a mobilehome that will remain in the park and that the selling homeowner or his or her agent give notice of the sale to the management before the close of the sale. Approval cannot be withheld if the purchaser has the financial ability to pay the rent and charges of the park unless the management reasonably determines that, based on the purchaser's prior tenancies, he or she will not comply with the rules and regulations of the park. In determining 2 of 6 05/06/98 09:04:00 WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-binat...docID=700655488+1+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve. whether the purchaser has the financial ability to pay the rent and charges of the park, the management shall not require the purchaser to submit copies of any personal income tax returns in order to obtain approval for residency in the park. However, management may require the purchaser to document the amount and source of his or her gross monthly income or means of financial support. Upon request of any prospective homeowner who proposes to purchase a mobilehome that will remain in the park, management shall inform that person of the information management will require in order to determine if the person will be acceptable as a homeowner in the park. Within 15 business days of receiving all of the information requested from the prospective homeowner, the management shall notify the seller and the prospective homeowner, in writing, of either acceptance or rejection of the application, and the reason if rejected. During this 15 -day period the prospective homeowner shall comply with the management's request, if any, for a personal interview. If the approval of a prospective homeowner is withheld for any reason other than those stated in this article, the management or owner may be held liable for all damages proximately resulting therefrom. (b) If the management collects a fee or charge from a prospective purchaser of a mobilehome in order to obtain a financial report or credit rating, the full amount of the fee or charge shall be credited toward payment of the first month's rent for that mobilehome purchaser. If, for whatever reason, the prospective purchaser is rejected by the management, the management shall refund to the prospective purchaser the full amount of that fee or charge within 30 days from the date of rejection. If the prospective purchaser is approved by the management, but, for whatever reason, the prospective purchaser elects not to purchase the mobilehome, the management may retain the fee, or a portion thereof, to defray its administrative costs under this section. 798.75. (a) An escrow, sale, or transfer agreement involving a mobilehome located in a park at the time of the sale, where the mobilehome is to remain in the park, shall contain a copy of either a fully executed rental agreement or a statement signed by the park's management and the prospective homeowner that the parties have agreed to the terms and conditions of a rental agreement. (b) In the event the purchaser fails to execute the rental agreement, the purchaser shall not have any rights of tenancy. (c) In the event that an occupant of a mobilehome has no rights of tenancy and is not otherwise entitled to occupy the mobilehome pursuant to this chapter, the occupant is considered an unlawful occupant if, after a demand is made for the surrender of the mobilehome park site, for a period of five days, the occupant refuses to surrender the site to the mobilehome park management. In the event the unlawful occupant fails to comply with the demand, the unlawful occupant shall be subject to the proceedings set forth in Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1159) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (d) The occupant of the mobilehome shall not be considered an unlawful occupant and shall not be subject to the provisions of subdivision (c) if all of the following conditions are present: (1) The occupant is the registered owner of the mobilehome. (2) The management has determined that the occupant has the financial ability to pay the rent and charges of the park; will comply with the rules and regulations of the park, based on the occupant's prior tenancies; and will comply with this article. (3) The management failed or refused to offer the occupant a 3 of 6 05/06/98 09:04:00 WAIS Document Retrieval rental agreement. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgat...docID=700655488+1+0+0&WAI Saction=retrieve 798.76. The management may require that a prospective purchaser comply with any rule or regulation limiting residency based on age requirements for housing for older persons, provided that the rule or regulation complies with the federal Fair Housing Act, as amended by Public Law 104-76, and implementing regulations. 798.77. No rental or sale agreement shall contain a provision by which the purchaser or homeowner waives his or her rights under this chapter. Any such waiver shall be deemed contrary to public policy and shall be void and unenforceable. 798.78. (a) An heir, joint tenant, or personal representative of the estate who gains ownership of a mobilehome in the mobilehome park through the death of the owner of the mobilehome who was a homeowner at the time of his or her death shall have the right to sell the mobilehome to a third party in accordance with the provisions of this article, but only if all the homeowner's responsibilities and liabilities to the management regarding rent, utilities, and reasonable maintenance of the mobilehome and its premises which have arisen since the death of the homeowner have been satisfied as they have accrued pursuant to the rental agreement in effect at the time of the death of the homeowner up until the date the mobilehome is resold. (b) In the event that the heir, joint tenant, or personal representative of the estate does not satisfy the requirements of subdivision (a) with respect to the satisfaction of the homeowner's responsibilities and liabilities to the management which accrue pursuant to the rental agreement in effect at the time of the death of the homeowner, the management shall have the right to require the removal of the mobilehome from the park. (c) Prior to the sale of a mobilehome by an heir, joint tenant, or personal representative of the estate, that individual may replace the existing mobilehome with another mobilehome, either new or used, or repair the existing mobilehome so that the mobilehome to be sold complies with health and safety standards provided in Sections 18550, 18552, and 18605 of the Health and Safety Code, and the regulations established thereunder. In the event the mobilehome is to be replaced, the replacement mobilehome shall also meet current standards of the park as contained in the park's most recent written requirements issued to prospective homeowners. (d) In the event the heir, joint tenant, or personal representative of the estate desires to establish a tenancy in the park, that individual shall comply with those provisions of this article which identify the requirements for a prospective purchaser of a mobilehome that remains in the park. 798.79. (a) Any legal owner or junior lienholder who forecloses on his or her security interest.in a mobilehome located in a mobilehome park shall have the right to sell the mobilehome within the park to a third party in accordance with this article, but only if all of the homeowner's responsibilities and liabilities to the management regarding rent, utilities, and reasonable maintenance of a mobilehome and its premises are satisfied by the foreclosing creditor as they 4 of 6 05/06/98 09:04:00 WAIS Document Retrieval http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bilkat...docID=700655488+1+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve accrue through the date the mobilehome is resold. (b) In the event the legal owner or junior lienholder has received from the management a copy of the notice of termination of tenancy for nonpayment of rent or other charges, the foreclosing creditor's right to sell the mobilehome within the park to a third party shall also be governed by Section 798.56a. 798.80. (a) Not less than 30 days nor more than one year prior to an owner of a mobilehome park entering into a written listing agreement with a licensed real estate broker, as defined in Article 1 (commencing with Section 10130) of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 4 of the Business and Professions Code, for the sale of the park, or offering to sell the park to any party, the owner shall provide written notice of his or her intention to sell the mobilehome park by first-class mail or by personal delivery to the president, secretary, and treasurer of any resident organization formed by homeowners in the mobilehome park as a nonprofit corporation, pursuant to Section 23701v of the Revenue and Taxation Code, stock cooperative corporation, or other entity for purposes of converting the mobilehome park to condominium or stock cooperative ownership interests and for purchasing the mobilehome park from the management of the mobilehome park. An offer to sell a park shall not be construed as an offer under this subdivision unless it is initiated by the park owner or agent. (b) An owner of a mobilehome park shall not be required to comply with subdivision (a) unless the following conditions are met: (1) The resident organization has first furnished the park owner or park manager a written notice of the name and address of the president, secretary, and treasurer of the resident organization to whom the notice of sale shall be given. (2) The resident organization has first notified the park owner or manager in writing that the park residents are interested in purchasing the park. The initial notice by the resident organization shall be made prior to a written listing or offer to sell the park by the park owner, and the resident organization shall give subsequent notice once each year thereafter that the park residents are interested in purchasing the park. (3) The resident organization has furnished the park owner or park manager a written notice, within five days, of any change in the name or address of the officers of the resident organization to whom the notice of sale shall be given. (c) Nothing in this section affects the validity of title to real property transferred in violation of this section, although a violation shall subject the seller to civil action pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 798.84) by homeowner residents of the park or the resident organization. (d) Nothing in this section affects the ability of a licensed real estate broker, as defined in Article 1 (commencing with Section 10130) of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 4 of the Business and Professions Code, to collect a commission pursuant to an executed contract between the broker and the mobilehome park owner. (e) Subdivision (a) does not apply to any of the following: (1) Any sale or other transfer by a park owner who is a natural person to any relation specified in Section 6401 or 6402 of the Probate Code. (2) Any transfer by gift, devise, or operation of law. (3) Any transfer by a corporation to an affiliate. As used in this paragraph, "affiliate" means any shareholder of the transferring corporation, any corporation or entity owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the transferring corporation, or any other 5 of 6 05/06/98 09:04:00 WAIS Document Retrieval • http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/wais corporation or entity controlled, directly or indirectly, by any shareholder of the transferring corporation. (4) Any transfer by a partnership to any of its partners. (5) Any conveyance resulting from the judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure of a mortgage or deed of trust encumbering a mobilehome park or any deed given in lieu of such a foreclosure. (6) Any sale or transfer between or among joint tenants or tenants in common owning a mobilehome park. (7) The purchase of a mobilehome park by a governmental entity under its powers of eminent domain. 798.81. The management (1) shall not prohibit the listing or sale of a used mobilehome within the park by the homeowner, an heir, joint tenant, or personal representative of the estate who gains ownership of a mobilehome in the mobilehome park through the death of the owner of the mobilehome who was a homeowner at the time of his or her death, or the agent of any such person other than the management, (2) nor require the selling homeowner to authorize the management to act as the agent in the sale of a mobilehome as a condition of approval of the buyer or prospective homeowner for residency in the park. 798.82. The management, at the time of an application for residency, shall disclose in writing to any person who proposes to purchase or install a manufactured home or mobilehome on a space, on which the construction of the pad or foundation system commenced after September 1, 1986, and no other manufactured home or mobilehome was previously located, installed, or occupied, that the manufactured home or mobilehome may be subject to a school facilities fee under Sections 53080 and 53080.4 of, and Chapter 4.9 (commencing with Section 65995) of Division 1 of Title 7 of, the Government Code. _ 798.83. In the case of a sale or transfer of a mobilehome that will remain in the park, the management of the park shall not require repairs or improvements to the park space or property owned by the management, except for damage caused by the actions or negligence of the homeowner or an agent of the homeowner. 6 of 6 05/06/98 09:04:01 WAIS Document Retrieval CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 798.84-798.88 . http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bilkat...docID=700655488+9+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve. 798.84. (a) No action based upon the management's alleged failure to maintain the physical improvements in the common facilities in good working order or condition or alleged reduction of service may be commenced by a homeowner unless the management has been given at least 30 days' prior notice of the intention to commence the action. (b) The notice shall be in writing, signed by the homeowner or homeowners making the allegations, and shall notify the management of the basis of the claim, the specific allegations, and the remedies requested. A notice by one homeowner shallbe deemed to be sufficient notice of the specific allegation to the management of the park by all of the homeowners in the park. (c) The notice may be served in the manner prescribed in Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 1010) of Title 14 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (d) For purposes of this section, management shall be deemed to be notified of an alleged failure to maintain the physical improvements in the common facilities in good working order or condition or of an alleged reduction of services upon substantial compliance by the homeowner or homeowners with the provisions of subdivisions (b) and (c), or when management has been notified of the alleged failure to maintain or the alleged reduction of services by a state or local agency. (e) If the notice is served within 30 days of the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, the time for the commencement of the action shall be extended 30 days from the service of the notice. (f) This section does not apply to actions for personal injury or wrongful death. 798.85. In any action arising out of the provisions of this chapter the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs. A party shall be deemed a prevailing party for the purposes of this section if the judgment is rendered in his or her favor or where the litigation is dismissed in his or her favor prior to or during the trial, unless the parties otherwise agree in the settlement or compromise. 798.86. In the event a homeowner or former homeowner of a park is the prevailing party in a civil action, including a small claims court action, against the management to enforce his or her rights under this chapter, the homeowner, in addition to damages afforded by law, may, in the discretion of the court, be awarded an amount not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each willful violation of this chapter by the management. 798.87. (a) The substantial failure of the management to provide and maintain physical improvements in the common facilities in good working order and condition shall be deemed a public nuisance. Notwithstanding Section 3491, such a nuisance may only be remedied by 1 of 2 05/06/98 09:14:44 WAIS Document Retrieval • http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/wail ...docID=700655488+9+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve a civil action or abatement. (b) The substantial violation of a mobilehome park rule shall be deemed a public nuisance. Notwithstanding Section 3491, such a nuisance may only be remedied by a civil action or abatement. (c) A civil action pursuant to this section may be brought by a park resident, the park management, or in the name of the people of California by the district attorney or the city attorney of the jurisdiction in which the park is located. 798.88. (a) In addition to any right under Article 6 (commencing with Section 798.55) to terminate the tenancy of a homeowner, any person in violation of a reasonable rule or regulation of a mobilehome park may be enjoined from the violation as provided in this section. (b) A petition for an order enjoining a continuing or recurring violation of any reasonable rule or regulation of a mobilehome park may be filed by the management thereof with the superior court for the county in which the mobilehome park is located. At the time of filing the petition, the petitioner may obtain a temporary restraining order in accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 527 of the Code of Civil Procedure. A temporary order restraining the violation may be granted, with notice, upon the petitioner's affidavit showing to the satisfaction of the court reasonable proof of a continuing or recurring violation of a rule or regulation of the mobilehome park by the named homeowner or resident and that great or irreparable harm would result to the management or other homeowners or residents of the park from continuance or recurrence of the violation. (c) A temporary restraining order granted pursuant to this subdivision shall be personally served upon the respondent homeowner or resident with the petition for injunction and notice of hearing thereon. The restraining order shall remain in effect for a period not to exceed 15 days, except as modified or sooner terminated by the court. (d) Within 15 days of filing the petition for an injunction, a hearing shall be held thereon. If the court, by clear and convincing evidence, finds the existence of a continuing or recurring violation of a reasonable rule or regulation of the mobilehome park, the court shall issue an injunction prohibiting the violation. The duration of the injunction shall not exceed three years. (e) However, not more than three months prior to the expiration of an injunction issued pursuant to this section, the management of the mobilehome park may petition under this section for a new injunction where there has been recurring or continuous violation of the injunction or there is a threat of future violation of the mobilehome park's rules upon termination of the injunction. (f) Nothing shall preclude a party to an action under this section from appearing through legal counsel or in propria persona. (g) The remedy provided by this section is nonexclusive and nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude or limit any rights the management of a mobilehome park may have to terminate a tenancy. 2 of 2 05/06/98 09:14:45 7'IM 7 —17-1 �7C .L J JAMES F KELEHER t�Y-NNtb Nt'. l_ JUNt`.a WOC EFT c TT_ _, -. L C '..APPETIAN Y17,Cr75C7'4 Y•.CLCf—IC7T a LLr A f4 Jtt . tfY CJ e1/4C L iiGK. Pk r MANHATTAN REACH. CALIFORNIA 510266 TELEPHONE (3101 546-B16Ti r* Z .1 fLL (310) 3A S?O—.' Mav 12, 1998 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: Marineland Mobilehome Park • 310 ...WO 3 !IQI r.�Jr= • ROBERT C. ARONOFR Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: This firm represents the owners of the above -designated property (the "Park"). Our clients have informed us as to the facts set forth below. 1. The Park consists of approximately 60 spaces, 20 spaces of which are Recreational Vehicle ("RV") spaces, which may not be occupied by mobile homes because of the zoning of the subject property. Park records indicate that 9 spaces are occupied by sub -tenants and 15 spaces are occupied by Park owned mobile homes. 2. Space rents range from $395 to $690 per month, with a weighted average monthly rent of $573. In the past year, rental adjustments have occurred as follows: (a) Annual increase: ranges from 1.6% to 8.4%; (b) Capital improvement pass through of $15.42 over a 2 year period; and. (c) The exclusion from rent of water ($12 per month), and the installation of separate meters. 3. The Park has offered and continues to offer long-term leases, which will provide lona-term predictability as to rents. 05/12/98 16:23 SUPPLEMENTAL 4 - INFORMATION TX/RX NO.1669 P.002 lir -is-i_ S iv -c_ 111 LLF • :10 5.46 5707 r.0.:/ LJnn.nreslllo iPAvnr on,i (`i+v (env ,nail 1..lorrnnmm Rorh ISA e.. 1") 100Q porno 71 4. Based on rental applications submitted and on the financial information contained therein. a maioritv of tenants are not low income tenants and no tenants have made an application for hardship adjustments. 5. In 1997. the Park spent $326,000 on repairs and upgrading of Park Utility Systems. A bid has been obtained to repair and upgrade the streets in the Park, however, the owners are waiting for a decision by the City regarding their precise plan before actually repairing the streets. Based on the foregoing, the rents are not excessive. There is no eviction through. renal increase or rent gouging going on. There is no need or justification for imposing rent control. The owners respectfully request that no rent control provisions be imposed on the Park. For further reference, please notify the undersigned as to important dates and please provide copies of relevant documents, such as studies, reports, and staff reports. cc: Client Vernon St. Clair Very truly yours, ANDERSEN & KELEHER, LLP iI i G. Steven Andersen TOTAL P.O: 05/12/98 16:23 TX/RX NO.1669 P.003 U gtving WOBLVf 104 'a6 o Apri res ts theMobilo i1ie Paik 00 -to Ottqlt 4 few bet.: ties of eharripittpie. • Tht's the, day.iscin*is esp‘d to'clese and tikeneriblOililit 10:.thOtitribOeft ffMash4. nun-profflpertietatiort.::' • —1 -hat five star park %OA saiti Liebeithol, executive directei fox Jen -theme, FA AZ2 • . - 7 • . i4640: Tv.$4*iofetiirtod :vio*Oit tar about yet, to get o'nott-ps,ofitigeney to boy the pat gaibeted -tit:'0,cooferonte town 7**,444y • ni:ght with their ititi*net,.!..titry .4101.0p, nc The Qiy j4it minute's before voted, WOniajoiXklk to apprcive Llw bund 4iad sale r1044.tinentti•Nbich Allowed the 000* to b:e issag4*iirrtinil Iri!ednesday. : • . 1110 axi*:4.,44iclt Mle " 441004 Se $ "EVeilitrintji is . •gveryoneireapid;t been 4 lotig toad,* A4yrott void, • The saga of lb* t-feadow* began last Niay *hen the residents asked the coUritzti to allo- cate hinds trout the federal CoMmiirrity Development Block Grants pm,o non-profit agency coul4 prirchase the park and stabilize the rents. a °WS; Deal took &year thdt letter k.v4s. adequate anti alltAved • they wanted the park to fOt-eril4s;.:. • • , 6'11.44zqrlid I Ih.i *4;4,0 thu ty Courir4.1.0greed..te belo. ' aaliit,-EVentuaify, they • .4riii4r41.1f,) font the city's :trfloidable housinq Wad,- : The W!IS held up ti*,if a Vont whim c.ottilt!J refuted to it:$;le a fetter of rtril which wortiri fleibt,rg up t4)111tee yeas teiti- v•i5i the niuney': The ;ant to iota: lettei. sem a lo.te,i 1(exneri Chit IMMO; 4:Incidernoir rht,! park worriti it„.; tki I FP, ailoweys sod the tale to progress, ' „ enteacil ItieThi)fltS•iittid two zve(...icti ai3o niattftto anneatinsi th tu,nds beteir' ilf04104 r8t0,144.!14P. ..p• sll hill: iec titi-xtiOr4 raid the e hy $150.,Oflp: But Wednesday Hoxbc..ril explained wtty the pit wati taised. in a lt:;:ttef to Ttrk dated' itlay 1991,, teprescotalive tioxitefgdIII tt 41s -crow un the pitrk,ei'ds4`1 ciosittiv Sepiv.ratiiet, the ]T1 wu1i 1..11ClediSt; i)y ' titduced thi“ S1.'0.1)0(1, Flextierfi said 'Thifre sholift ltov,v1,14un no stapiketi ° i5,04ber, srird ho's,th rr4 • • t.tIli.t hid 01lrqVi 11 i% Mat 2 croak S: ,we rifting to an the trdrssactint yhadnomeow nteto se t., he tt : t i yew owner will 1 tep teats as. rtssib1 ' Apr Ito elderly retoderAs out .1tk tx had 1h'au 1 natF, .Iu? re ,idejit, d&. ret 6, ni4 ,ib p fb • < Of-prof&t jai order`: to 410— ' `a rets anti the perk ul ir+ ma exciLI hely Jut tpplri flirt*years to retri- ApII ta,:.199.e- Mazes Ysetxayi atraoeltatvs Wear' Neere Mews res dents: Reva Combs; Lowell Stalk, Howard Hanby Lois Handy Bali Lusk, Edgar Jells. Dorothy Lewin, and Virginia Wenner (frons Left) helped. set up the new owriert hip arrangement at The Meadows. Mobite Home Park arrangement pleases _res dents FRuat /-ttt1 , a 31edgling nott.prt t hourcieg regency ..;said. *Oteiruce. we're stilian,the• toutsea�itrs - ; 4din Colit; Mese. Cash success � �=ifld. xt-were happy.' tytoocoverpa~isWtotuaste; ,At hnn- its first.meetin tri Noveu er, the Ow bipbransferred to.Jarnborete .th area attd:iliak,tbougbte Niesi3trrevt* ctuncZ'votettteitcsue-the bonds need- ` rngzsaa Ca rp;; a stars=parriitt. affordable • ainattd beanother good candidata-. ' - ed for the ptxcehetie slilI tutaettte:i liouel rq egizrtry-not-..unfeiniliarto Meenwthile Ayranend .tlte-, Was -the matter of. the'ietterofCord em. Irvine-The!:.corporat on IS' baseEI.ir nine-rudentover'sight conimitteo atet. AaftOA,' use e:ta �t thn ittn al i! btadge with Heit►erg wbo'agreed to sell'the :- ,At thellieCorid. Meeting,' Christensen `a i 6—unut or v coittplt x park, but .only if:heeektkl:ge a. *1033 suggested to:th_e- council they sed a and .parttt;ipated its e';fir'ut tome htrme i itCha>xge, . svh .h•Viduld edea hbn up letter to' Hcxbatt;,> threatening to pot buyer,prograntttiatsawIti-bomea tai to three years to reinvest ktonr the:mattes of cbndeminiag.1he park on 'Mine purchased without a tax peitsttiii i .;tar uaifq` agenda' if ht' didn't -doost Tlie fttrllxtler:bume. itr=the, pec a crow with:Jambnrne Hoeisueg Pte. apo- ia'May;'2++feadFKvs.eesidents. kms. .. Jaatioa's-fttst eEreh vonture and•ezecrt" the chamber at a City Couitcft 3 ieetit Co me i ra c `� : tive director Lila Lieb'rthei said she is and implored the cnurtr_il" for a That did thetri Thart elt'e.r•prti: . . excited, about di. ; 6» nt 43nst - COtistn iliias g:the' andby tbeerid of acen er."errcconduit for-iiferdb1ehlettfie part. Atthtmethe raiinciI agreed opened. Last month. the G.t cite and expand housing opportunities that, it would liketo he C.antas buy a Y���y�k � t,prttved.tha bond.salar pttperwrirk. for low' and moderate iucauie people." the_ park and. asked for a corporate. which aliowwed the' bends' to -be said the i leoeztha#..setitl: "My board and• l. eudit.and other paperwork. The noun. ,following week. eoaldn'tbemoreexctted.abetruthis° Ei was told there was. a 5500.000 • The oversight committee inier lydtl5etttibrt r affordable hit . . Lysing allocation �tilag in viewed four management conar}�iuttets; She sodded the work of the Tess- the bank awaiting dispersal.: aril ga%-e Jamboree its top three dilate - den titethe City: Council and Larry But the council wanted::aasur&uce es. Agree, whose attorney services were that 11 it.put; up•the money to float the Lieberthal .satd the Jamboree board retained by t€eertesidents • , = - " `bonds for Caritas to buy- this park, the : of directors, which had the €tnal The Meadows':gaga began iri June city wouldn't-be.stuck if there was a choice, Noose Newport Pacific Proper- if .wvhen' it was:learned.there were default in paving it back. ty. 72 different. rents in the -30O -plus coach The matter dragged on through surra- ' Mary 3o Goelzer, vivo president of park, acccrdrp to resident B.,I. Lusk. A . mer 1987, with meetings behind closed Newport Pacific. said the personnel town heti rneetirig cat the residents was doors between the council and the city from the old management company brat and they voted` n.lavor of hiring attorney causing much anxiety among operating et the Meadows were kept legal council oto frac the problem the residents. It seemed Caritas wasn't • on. • Reva Combs, a 26 -year resident of conttng.through with the requests They were fired one, day. and the park; said she called Agraa, a for- made by.the cit} and it lookedalmostrehired by us -the nest,' she said.' trier mayor and .City Council member as if the matter was at an impasse. 'Nothing will be different.- .only.ureic who worked to facilitate resident - t n Then in September. council them- paychecks.' . erstiip of tine Groves Mobile Hoare bars Mike Ward and Dave Cttnbttnsen Coeizer said everything as in a tract. Park, and asked if he was; aware of anv wor.e assigned to a task force to push sittonat phase right now and she is attorney who could help them out. things lanyard. another stacking point excited about managing "property `SO he said. 14'ftat about me?' ". emerged "when the council refused to right in-ntv backyard.." Combs recalled. "Lie have always send a letter to ties:be.rq threatening to The oversight committee members railed or: Larry over this years. He's condemn they park. Such K latter would lauded A.crran'i work. but he wets *best- berz+.n a good friend to us," give Hextterg what fie needed to affect tarsi to take any credit_ He compli- s++tran was hirers :r...ruly and het tate 103: exchange: But the council merited, the residence' dogged deiarmi- about crvsno-t . ax the diserepat:ctes•irs dratted it•newer intended to condemn - ration. the rent structures: :New rents wren- the park and sanding such a leiter "Trice people. Sn t ... Morn really were isesrtUaitr rerrey•::ttatc i. would be deceptvt•. the Jnr. -acre makers ' h..e said tzticrut tiee in January •Diann Lrou•;ht it i Another twu' months t,hs passed, bit .e*' c .rcrnitte. -The residents :Wade this broker. r. George 'rear of the W estridge the meantime., arca cn-ers.r;ht rttromitter= possible and r was pieasec to work tato' y Lc. discuss-nort-prt,tit-ownership had it fist- of eight other np2'i-profits it with tsC.'rf."folks." .. of the pari. It was an ide.,a rite residents was leok:ing at. Lusk acid of the eight. Fk called the ownership of the park r.r_tt •awed. but there was itldi a iunc; the group interviewed tour and sett3- t by a nonprofit a 'le-gacy.' the resi- re,ad ah€-.sil in make it new on Jamboree. • dents have sat up far future residents Turk had worker With CCorp_ `It's like a breath of fresh air.' Li , of the nark. • May 6,T998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998 SUBJECT: 6TH ST. TRAFFIC STUDY -PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TO ARDMORE AVENUE Recommendation: That the City Council direct staff as deemed appropriate. Background: On February 10, 1998, the City Council directed staff to proceed with a traffic study to limit 6th Street traffic in the block between Ardmore Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway, by closing 6th Street to westbound traffic west of the commercial zone. Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LL & G) prepared the attached traffic study. Analysis: The study area included 6th Street between Ardmore Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway and adjacent residential streets ( 8th, 6th, 5th and 2nd Streets). The existing and proposed conditions were examined using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of analysis and the incremental daily traffic increase methodology developed by the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to determine: 1. The volume to capacity (v/c) ratio and level of service (LOS) of 8th, 5th and 2nd Street intersections' 2. The percentage of redistribution of traffic expected with reconfiguration of 6th Street2 Conclusions of Study: The proposed reconfiguration of 6th Street (closing 6th Street to west bound traffic west of the commercial zone) results in the following traffic impacts3: • 17.9% increase to daily traffic added to 6th St. east of Ardmore Ave. (1,203 vehicles to 1,418 vehicles) & 13.1% decrease to daily traffic added to 6th St. west of PCH (1635 vehicles to 1,420 vehicles). • 8th, 5th and 2nd Streets west of PCH increased traffic added respectively with 4.4%, 14.9% and 4.3% • AM/PM peak V/C and LOS not significantly impacted at signalized 8th, 5th 2nd /PCH intersection • Ardmore at 6th Street unsignalized intersection is not significantly impacted. • Ardmore north of 6th St. and south of 6th Street increased traffic respectively with 5.0% and 13.6% • Ardmore north of 2nd St. impacted with 8% traffic volume increase. Sol Blumenfel Community Concur: , Director velopment Department Stephen R.err City Manager Notes 1. Volume capacity (v/c) is the ratio of the volume of traffic to the capacity of the roadway. Level of Service (LOS) is the standard used for the amount of traffic delay over a 24 hour period for an intersection. A % increase in VC or drop below LOS D Level is generally considered a significant impact. 2. L.A. DOT methodology used to assess the percent of redistributed traffic expected to increase on surrounding streets. 3. Table I - Traffic Study. Attachments: 1. Traffic Study 5 • CLOSURE OF 6TH STREET TO WESTBOUND TRAFFIC WEST OF COMMERCIAL ZONE PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TO ARDMORE AVENUE Hermosa Beach, California Prepared for: Mr. Sol Blumenfeld City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Prepared by: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 234 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 400 Pasadena, California 91101 Phone: (626) 796-2322 Fax: (626) 792-0941 May 4, 1998 1-972704-1 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS ENGINEERS & PLANNERS • TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 234 East Colorado Blvd, Suite 400 • Pasadena, California 91101 Phone: 626 796-2322 • Fax: 626 792-0941 May 4, 1998 Mr. Sol Blumenfeld City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Subject: Closure of 6th Street to Westbound Traffic West of the Commercial Zone 6th Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Ardmore Avenue Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: Pursuant to your authorization, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, is pleased to submit this analysis of the operation of traffic, in the block between Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Ardmore Avenue, resulting from the proposed closure of . 6th Street to westbound traffic west of the commercial zone. Briefly, we conclude that daily traffic, redistributed as a result of the closure of 6th Street to westbound traffic past the commercial zone, is expected to significantly impact (1) 6th Street east of Ardmore Avenue, (2) 5th Street west of PCH, and (3) Ardmore Avenue south of 6th Street. However, the anticipated change in traffic pattern is not expected to significantly. impact the signalized residential street intersections on PCH, nor the stop controlled intersections on Ardmore Avenue. Study Area Figure 1, at the rear of this report, shows the location of 6th Street and its relation to the surrounding network of streets. To determine the potential impact of closing 6th Street to westbound traffic past the commercial zone, traffic on the three adjacent residential streets (8th Street, 5th Street and 2nd Street), which have signalized intersections with PCH, has been analyzed. Existing Conditions Figure 2, illustrates existing conditions on 8th Street, 6th Street, 5th Street, 2nd Street, and Ardmore Avenue. Shown are street width, effective travel way (street width less parking), general parking conditions, traffic controls, and current 24-hour (two-way) traffic volumes. Philip M. Linscott, P.E. (Ret. ) Jack M. Greenspan, P.E. William A. Law, P.E. (Ret.) Paul W. Wilkinson, P.E. John P. Keating, P.E. David S. Shendcr, P.E. Costa Mesa - 714 641-1587 • San Diego - 619 299-3090 • Las Vegas - 702 451-1920 • An LG2WB Company LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 7 • • Mr. Sol Blumenfeld May 4, 1998 Page Two From Figure 2, it can be seen that 6th. Street is 28 feet wide with parking allowed on both sides of the street. Where conditions (such as driveway spacing) permit vehicles to be parked opposite one another, the travel way available for two-way traffic is effectively reduced to 12 feet. The 6th Street intersection with PCH is unsignalized, and eastbound traffic is restricted to right -turn only at PCH. Current 24-hour traffic volumes (two-way) on 6th Street are 1,635 vehicles west of PCH and 1,203 vehicles east of Ardmore Avenue. The portion of 6th Street immediately west of PCH contains commercial uses, with the most prominent use being Learned Lumber on the north side of the street. Existing AM and PM peak commute hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3 (AM peak hour) and Figure 4 (PM peak hour). Looking at Figure 3, it is significant to note that in the AM peak commute hour, 22 (61 percent) of the 36 vehicles eastbound on 6th Street made an illegal left -turn onto northbound PCH. Traffic Redistribution The redistribution of existing westbound 24-hour traffic on 6th Street past the commercial zone to the adjacent residential streets is shown on Figure 5. Existing two-way traffic by direction, and anticipated one-way eastbound traffic past the westbound closure on 6th .Street west of the commercial zone, is shown on Figure 6. Daily traffic on 6th Street east of Ardmore Avenue is projected to increase from 1,203 vehicles to 1,418 vehicles. West of PCH, daily traffic is expected to show a decrease in volume from 1,635 vehicles to 1,420 vehicles. Traffic Analysis Residential Streets Projected daily residential street traffic, with 6th Street closed to westbound traffic past the commercial zone, is presented in Table 1, following the figures at the rear of this report. Table 1 shows existing 24 hour traffic volume, redistributed volume caused by the westbound traffic closure on 6th Street, the resulting projected volume, and percent increase or decrease in traffic volume. Also shown on Table 1 is the expected impact on 8th Street, 6th Street, 5th Street, 2nd Street, and Ardmore Avenue. Since the City of Hermosa Beach does not presently have a residential street traffic criteria to identify significant impact, we have employed the incremental daily traffic increase methodology developed by the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation (See Note 4 on Table 1). Three of the eight residential street segments analyzed are shown to be impacted as a result of the closure of 6th Street to westbound traffic past the commercial zone. These segments are, (1) 6th Street east of Ardmore Avenue, (2) 5th Street west of PCH, and (3) Ardmore Avenue south of 6th Street. 1 • LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Mr. Sol Blumenfeld May 4, 1998 Page Three Pacific Coast Highway As requested, we have also conducted a volume -to -capacity (v/c) and Level of Service (LOS) analysis of the signalized intersections of 8th Street, 5th Street and 2nd Street with PCH, using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of analysis. The results of this analysis is presented in Table 2 (detailed ICU analysis worksheets follow Table 2). To identify significant traffic impact, we have applied the same impact criteria that has been employed in prior Hermosa Beach traffic analyses; LOS D (signalized) v/c = 0.81-0.90 LOS E/F (signalized) v/c = 0.91 or greater LOS D/E (unsignalized) Significant Impact = v/c increase greater than 0.020 Significant Impact = v/c increase greater than 0.010 Significant Impact = Drop LOS by one level From Table 2, it can be seen that the closure of 6th Street to westbound traffic past the commercial zone, is not expected to produce a significant impact on the adjacent signalized PCH intersections. Ardmore Avenue Also shown on the lower half of Table 2, is the results of the analysis of Ardmore Avenue traffic, using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) for unsignalized intersections (detailed HCS analysis worksheets follow the ICU worksheets at the end of this report). Examination of the table shows that the closure of 6th Street to westbound traffic past the commercial zone, is not expected to result in significant traffic impact. Conclusions • Daily traffic redistributed as a result of the closure of 6th Street to westbound traffic west of thecommercial zone (between PCH and Ardmore Avenue) can be expected to significantly -impact, (1) 6th Street east of Ardmore Avenue, (2) 5th Street west of PCH, and (3) Ardmore Avenue south of 6th Street. • Daily traffic added to 6th Street east of Ardmore Avenue, can be expected to result in a significant residential street traffic impact, increasing daily traffic by 17.9 percent. Similarly, traffic on 5th Street west of PCH is expected to increase by 14.9 percent. • Analysis of AM and PM peak commute hour traffic at the signalized intersections of 8th Street, 5th Street, and 2nd Street with PCH, show that the closure of 6th Street to westbound traffic past the commercial zone, is not expected to produce significant traffic impact at these locations. • • LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Mr. Sol Blumenfeld May 4, 1998 Page Four Analysis of AM and PM commute hour traffic at the unsignalized intersections on Ardmore Avenue show that the closure of 6th Street to westbound traffic west of the commercial zone is not expected to result in significant traffic impact. Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, welcomes the opportunity to prepare this analysis of the proposed closure of 6th Street to westbound traffic past the commercial zone (between Ardmore Avenue and PCH). Should there be any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers ack M. Greenspan, P.E. Principal attachments 2704.03 • • LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN MAP SOURCE. 11-K)MAS BROS. GUIDE G 9 R .7 NOT TO SCALE 1 VICINITY MAP 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH 8TH PLACE -D \► AO) -u 0 = SIGNAL - ALL WAY STOP (AWS) - STOP SIGN NP - NO PARKING P - PARKING XX TRAVEL WAY (2 -WAY) XX STREET WIDTH XXXX - 24-HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (• - ESTIMATED) NOTE: Travelway (2 -Way) - Street width - 8' for parking (where permitted) 8TH STREET 20 28 -u 7TH STREET w CO rn i 1203 O w -o SIV N a) w 0 • -o /► 1► =v 12 -v 28 20 28 22 NP P 6Th STREET P 30 P 5TH STREET P NP 4TH STREET 3RD STREET 4448 2ND STREET NP 1ST PLACE 1635 n 2194 3050* 8TH 7TH rn O Di. ) 4Th 6TH 3RD 17.4 D LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN E NGVMEIS NOT TO SCALE 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH AW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS NOT TO SCALE 3 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM PEAK HOUR 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH [ 0:\JOB_FILE\2704\DWG\P2704E4 LDP 03/11/98 DON LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E ER S NOT TO SCALE 4 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES PM PEAK HOUR 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH Ci 0:\JO8_FILE\2704\DWG\P2704E5 L L1NSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGOWEERS NOT TO SCALE 5 24-HOUR TRAFFIC REDISTRIBUTION 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH 4 a 3 `W m —541 662 1203 Total 6Th STREET --1008 627— g—A. M 1635 Total -v 0 EXISTING 24-HOUR -- 322 1096 -- 1418 Total RESIDENTIAL AND coMMERCiAL I.—o 199 ......'--'4P 6TH STREET — 574 .4::.:4 846 ilir 1420 Total -o WTIH WESTBOUND BARRIER SEPARATING COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN 6 24 HOUR TRAFFIC WITH 6TH STREET ONE-WAY EASTBOUND ENGINEERS NOT TO SCALE 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH • Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Table 1 PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL STREET TRAFFIC 6TH STREET (ONE-WAY EASTBOUND) BETWEEN ARDMORE AVENUE & PCH 6TH Street Hermosa Beach U5/U4/VO LOCATION EXISTING VOLUME REDISTRIBUTED VOLUME PROJECTED VOLUME PERCENT INCREASE IMPACT NOTE 4 8th Street west of PCH 4,448 +195 4,643 +4.4 NO 6th Street west of PCH 1,635 See Note 1 1,420 -13.1 NO 6th Street east of Ardmore 1,203 See Note 2 1,418 +17.9 YES 5th Street west of PCH 2,194 +328 2,522 +14.9 YES 2nd Street west of PCH 3,050 +130 3,180 +4.3 NO Ardmore Avenue north of 6th Street 3,886 +195 4,081 +5.0 NO Ardmore Avenue south of 6th Street 3,370 See Note 3 3,228 +13.6 YES Ardmore Avenue north of 2nd Street 1,630 +130 1,760 +8.0 NO 1. Eastbound 6th Street west of Pacific Coast Highway + redirected westbound 6th Street west of PCH; 627 + 793 = 1420. 2. Eastbound 6th Street east of Ardmore Ave + redistributed westbound 6th Street west of Pacific Coast Highway; 662 + 756 = 1418. 3. Northbound redistribution from westbound 6th Street east of Ardmore Ave + northbound redistribution from westbound 6th Street west of Pacific Coast Highway - south redistribution from westbound 6th Street east of Ardmore Ave; 219.+ 239 = 458 + 3370 = 3828. 4. Residential street impact criteria: Final Daily Traffic 1,000 or more 2,000 or more 3,000 or more Related Increase in Daily Traffic 12% or more of final daily 10% or more of final daily 8% or more of final daily Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS AND LEVELS OF SERVICE AM AND PM PEAK HOURS 6TH Street Hermosa Beach NO. INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR [1] EXISTING V/C LOS [2] W/ 6TH ST NO WB PAST COMMERCIAL V/C LOS CHANGE V/C ((2)-(1)] SIGNIF. IMPACT 1 Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) and AM 0.916 E 0.916 E 0.000 NO 8TH Street PM 0.844 D 0.846 D 0.002 NO 2 Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) and AM 0.814 D 0.814 D 0.000 NO 5TH Street PM 0.789 C 0.798 C 0.009 NO 3 Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) and AM 0.812 D 0.812 D 0.000 NO 2ND Street PM 0.814 D 0.813 D -0.001 NO SUMMARY OF UNIGNALIZED INTERSETION DELAYS AND LEVELS OF SERVICE AM AND PM PEAK HOURS NO. INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR [1] EXISTING (a) DELAY LOS [2] W/ 6TH ST NO WB PAST COML. (a) DELAY LOS CHANGE V/C [(2)-(1)] SIGNIF. IMPACT 4 Ardmore Avenue and AM 6.4 B 6.7 B 0.3 NO 8TH Street PM 4.5 A 4.9 A 0.4 NO 5 Ardmore Avenue and AM 0.7 A 2.1 A 1.4 NO 6TH Street PM 0.4 A 1.9 A 1.5 NO 6 Ardmore Avenue and AM 1.0 A 1.1 A 0.1 NO 5TH Street PM 0.9 A 0.8 A -0.1 NO 7 Ardmore Avenue and AM 2.0 A 2.0 A 0.0 NO 2ND Street PM 2.1 A 2.1 A 0.0 NO (a) Average intersection delay (seconds). .. ¢r • m •a' - �- Wil" +`v *" .. , tiF'' .0 k ` F • 47.111 a r •e,• • '41, 1 • l'' fl; •-•:,., 1 ✓r%4,:r'r."..:1r4".1-.1'.'7V4:4 'F,.'tdki4j A `r`t:+!r.• 2} C4,-;.; i.'F >1�„' -, �; ,-,...1t- 1 '��5 j tR } s��3..).,• i. : si '1 14et . - ' �; •,; 't'. k. ... ! i 'l j .4 ,r",'4.1••z4 s 3.'x^i ti. ,GF ;.• •'y, e t -� ` T"i; t"t ;i _ '� 7.-, 14•1+'' ..• 4ag 'Y j4 H} �'� ''P tii, H(` `+. f ITa Y'9• -, !h Cr moi. .'1 '.7�' ;Y;�tOS • r�y�1}y�( tb�a,iR s�:+ •12 i; �. 9. f ° 1� -r. 'ft q.b 'a{^0.0}N.a44)* . �fi�.� . Ai ' -.i.-4'4 ' • ' .-,--11/-•4,,i !'oiir--ti:4;4•1:,.-'' ''-,1 3 _ '',1=.,,g'Jf` T .. f *y▪ w.J .a�'i' ', 4." t;74- a';.t t �[/ I ..i`.E it•''..:17::,:".... „ ��'r^h-.Li, s�ritP, ; i � 1,dv;1r•. tiLa :#a.at " 0 21.4 a a i s M1 r•. r ':�',� < i „'b ;M,/1�Y,.. ;yy=_1�s�ty,♦• � t ^��j,'{ ���r fit•' ...'%i� . • •'S�*yiai�• ' 1�•'o- 1 ,'rr/ 140 �"7i•;:14!14,1341 fD;1 4i3 7 z • .r • • ,k,'447 Pyr•xr>. • t. ,. • 7r7 1 ! h r. c i ;fie • „'+T iL q 4 ? _ if{c L�}*: iOct-.x� W E 7 `t - l? --1. ' Ni"- a1 - G ' ♦ jj 7 M +�.^ ^1i may! 'i' i ^ I.41 y�� y F— 4 f i, i. �.,"fie �Y11. it •$y :7:4 , 1• • • a - F I i •. 12 • t LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 N -S St: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) E -W St: 8TH Street Project: 6th Street No WB Past Coml. - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 Date: 05/04/98 File: ICU5 Date of Count: 1997 Projection Year: 1998 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 8TH Street Peak hr: AM 1997 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST NO WB PAST COML. Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 25 1600 0.016 0 25 0.016 Nb Thru 3146 4800 0.656 * 0 3146 0.656 * Nb Right 4 0 - 0 4 - Sb Left 4 1600 0.003 * 0 4 0.003 * Sb Thru 1211 3200 0.388, 0 1211 0.388 Sb Right 32 0 - 0 32 - Eb Left 225 0 0.000 0 225 0.000 Eb Thru 0 1600 0.157 * 0 0 0.157 * Eb Right 26 0 - 0 26 - Wb Left 11 0 0.000 * 0 11 0.000 * Wb Thru 32 1600 0.040 0 32 0.040 Wb Right 21 0 - 0 21 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU - 0.916 0.916 LOS E E * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green • s LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 8TH Street N -S St: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) Peak hr: PM E -W St: 8TH Street Project: 6th Street No WB Past Coml. - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 Date: 05/04/98 File: ICU5 Date of Count: 1997 Projection Year: 1998 1997 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST NO WB PAST COML. Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 35 1600 0.022 * 0 35 0.022 * Nb Thru 1704 3200 0.534 0 1704 0.534 Nb Right 4 0 - 0 4 - Sb Left 4 1600 0.003 0 4 0.003 Sb Thru 2981 4800 0.644 * 0 2981 0.646 * Sb Right 111 0 - 8 119 - Eb Left 91 0 0.000 0 91 0.000 Eb Thru 1 1600 0.078 * 0 1 0.078 * Eb Right 33 0 - 0 33 - Wb Left 21 0 0.000 * 0 21 0.000 * Wb Thru 23 1600 0.037 0 23 0.037 Wb Right 15 0 - 0 15 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 ' 0.100 * ICU 0.844 0.846 LOS D D * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 5TH Street N -S St: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) Peak hr: AM E -W St: 5TH Street Project: 6th Street No WB Past Coml. - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 Date: 05/04/98 File: ICU7 Date of Count: 1997 Projection Year: 1998 1997 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST NO WB PAST COML. Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 11 1600 0.007 0 11 0.007 Nb Thru 3066 4800 0.646 * 0 3066 0.646 * Nb Right 35 0 - 0 35 - Sb Left 51 1600 0.032 * 0 51 0.032 * Sb Thru 1152 3200 0.363 0 1152 0.368 Sb Right 10 0 - 16 26 - Eb Left 14 0 0.000 * 0 14 0.000 * Eb Thru • 11 1600 0.023 0 11 0.023 Eb Right 12 0 - 0 12 - Wb Left 9 0 0.000 0 9 0.000 Wb Thru 10 1600 0.036 * 0 10 0.036 * Wb Right 39 0 - 0 39 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU 0.814 0.814 LOS D D * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green • • LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 5TH Street N -S St: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) Peak hr: PM E -W St: 5TH Street Project: 6th Street No WB Past Coml. - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 Date: 05/04/98 File: ICU7 Date of Count: 1997 Projection Year: 1998 1997 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST NO WB PAST COML. Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 17 1600 0.011 * 2 19 0.012 * Nb Thru 1654 3200 0.525 0 1654 0.525 Nb Right 25 0 - 0 25 - Sb Left 84 1600 0.053 0 84 0.053 Sb Thru 2916 4800 0.614 * 12 2928 0.621 * Sb Right 33 0 - 21 54 - Eb Left 38 0 0.000 * 0 38 0.000 * Eb Thru 22 1600 0.054 0 22 0.054 Eb Right 26 0 - 0 26 - Wb Left 34 0 0.000 0 34 0.000 Wb Thru 25 1600 0.064 * 0 25 0.064 * Wb Right 44 0 - 0 44 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU - 0.789 0.798 LOS C C * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green • • LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 2ND Street N -S St: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) Peak hr: AM E -W St: 2ND Street Project: 6th Street No WB Past Coml. - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 Date: 05/04/98 File: ICU8 Date of Count: 1998 Projection Year: 1998 1998 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST NO WB PAST COML. Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 42 1600 0.026 0 42 0.026 Nb Thru 3095 4800 0.645 * 0 3095 0.645 * Nb Right 0 0 - 0 0 - Sb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0.000 * Sb Thru 1186 3200 0.385 0 1186 0.385 Sb Right 45 0 - 0 45 - Eb Left 76 0 0.000 0 . 76 0.000 Eb Thru 0 1600 0.067 * 0 0 0.067 * Eb Right 31 0 - 0 31 - Wb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0.000 * Wb Thru 0 1600 0.000 0 0 0.000 Wb Right 0 0 - 0 0 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU 0.812 0.812 LOS D D * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 N -S St: E -W St: Project: File: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) 2ND Street 6th Street No WB Past Coml. - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 ICU8 1998 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST NO WB PAST COML. Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 47 1600 0.029 * -5 42 0.026 * Nb Thru 1737 3200 0.543 5 1742 0.544 Nb Right 0 0 - 0 0 - Sb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 Sb Thru 2851 4800 0.609 * 12 2863 0.612 * Sb Right 74 0 - 0 74 - Eb Left 59 0 0.000 0 59 0.000 Eb Thru 0 1600 0.075 * 0 0 0.075 * Eb Right 61 0 - 0 61 - Wb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0.000 * Wb Thru 0 1600 0.000 0 0 0.000 Wb Right 0 0 - 0 0 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU - 0.814 0.813 LOS D D * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 2ND Street Peak hr: PM Date: Date of Count: Projection Year: 05/04/98 1998 1998 • • 4 4.1 HCM Data Worksheets Existing Condtions 111 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d • INT1C1AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 8th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour INT1CIAM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O > 1 < 0 50 203 28 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R O > 1 < 0 6 48 29 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 99 182 38 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 0 83 16 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 53 6 104 0 RT Flow Rate 29 31 40 17 Approach Flow Rate 296 88 336 104 Proportion LT 0.18 0.07 0.31 0.00 Proportion RT 0.10 0.35 0.12 0.16 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 88 296 104 336 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 440 440 384 384 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.36 0.11 0.41 0.13 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.11 0.36 0.13 0.41 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 6 53 0 104 RT, Opposing Approach 31 29 17 40 LT, Conflicting Approaches 104 104 59 59 RT, Conflicting Approaches 57 57 60 60 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.07 0.18 0.00 0.31 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.35 0.10 0.16 0.12 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.24 0.24 0.15 0.15 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.16 Approach Capacity 552 392 630 443 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 296 552 0.54 7.7 B SB 88 392 0.22 2.3 A EB 336 630 0.53 7.6 B WB 104 443 0.23 2.4 A Intersection Delay = 6.4 Level of Service (Intersection) = B • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT1C1PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 8th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour INT1C1PM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O > 1 < 0 49 84 13 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R O > 1 < 0 24 123 99 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R O > 1 < 0 31 87 27 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 9 145 17 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 52 25 33 9 RT Flow Rate 14 104 28 18 Approach Flow Rate 154 258 153 180 Proportion LT 0.34 0.10 0.22 0.05 Proportion RT 0.09 0.40 0.18 0.10 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 258 154 180 153 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 333 333 412 412 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.21 0.35 0.21 0.24 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.35 0.21 0.24 0.21 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 25 52 9 33 RT, Opposing Approach 104 14 18 28 LT, Conflicting Approaches 42 42 77 77 RT, Conflicting Approaches 46 46 118 118 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.10 0.34 0.05 0.22 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.40 0.09 0.10 0.18 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 0.19 0.19 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.14 0.14 0.29 0.29 Approach Capacity 604 511 509 487 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 154 604 0.25 2.6 A SB 258 511 0.50 6.8 B EB 153 509 0.30 3.1 A WB 180 487 0.37 4.1 A Intersection Delay = 4.5 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS: Unsignalized Inte3rsections Release 2.1d IIINT2C1AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 6th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour INT2C1AM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's Northbound L T R 0 1 < 0 N 230 2 .95 .95 0 Southbound L T R O > 1 25 60 .95 .95 0 1.10 0 N Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 1 0 44 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C1AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 243 1043 1043 O .95 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 244 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1312 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1312 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 332 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 730 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 713 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 332 680 O .98 0.98 O .98 664 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C1AM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 1 664 > WB T 0 713 > 1032 3.7 0.0 A 3.7 WB R 51 1043 > SB L 29 1312 2.8 0.0 A Intersection Delay = 0.7 sec/veh 0.8 HCS: Unsignal Center For Mi University of 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, Ph: (904) 392 III ized Intersections Release 2.1d �INT2C1PM.HCO Page 1 crocomputers In Transportation Florida FL 32611-2083 -0378' Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour INT2C1PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection (E -W) 6th Street No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (o) SU/RV's (9) CV's (% ) PCE's Northbound L T R 0 1 < 0 N 139 7 11 .95 .95 .95 0 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 0 1.10 129 .95 0 N Eastbound L T R O 0 0 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 7 0 23 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Vehicle Maneuver Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) Follow-up Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C1PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 150 1162 1162 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 153 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1449 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1449 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 298 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 761 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph). 754 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, .Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 298 712 0.99 0.99 0.99 705 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C1PM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 8 705 > WB T 0 754 > 1008 3.7 0.0 A 3.7 WB R 26 1162 > SB L 13 1449 2.5 0.0 A Intersection Delay = 0.4 sec/veh 0.2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d •NT3C1AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 5th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour INT3CIAM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s (% ) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's Northbound L T R 0 1 < 0 N 170 22 .95 .95 0 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 0 N 35 37 .95 .95 0 1.10 Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 1 0 61 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C1AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 190 1109 1109 0.94 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 202 1373 1373 0.97 1700 0.97 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 266 791 0.97 767 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 266 743 0.97 0.97 0.97 720 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C1AM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 1 720 > WB T 0 767 > 1101 3.5 0.1 A 3.5 WB R 70 1109 > SB L 41 1373 2.7 0.0 A Intersection Delay = 1.0 sec/veh 1.3 46 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d �INT3C1PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 5th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour INT3C1PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (PO SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's Northbound L T R O 1 < 0 N 98 16 .95 95 0 Southbound L T R 38 .95 1.10 > 1 0 N 105 .95 0 Eastbound L T R O 0 0 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 14 0 38 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C1PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 112 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1215 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1215 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.96 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 120 1503 1503 0.97 1700 0.97 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 262 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 795 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 770 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 262 747 0.97 0.97 0.97 724 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C1PM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 17 724 > WB T 0 770 > 1022 3.7 0.1 A 3.7 WB R 44 1215 > SB L 44 1503 2.5 0.0 A Intersection Delay = 0.9 sec/veh 0.7 HCS: Unsignalized Into sections Release 2.1d 4111NT4C1AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 2th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour INT4C1AM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O > 1 < 0 15 60 18 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R O > 1 < 0 19 10 12 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R O > 1 < 0 39 74 7 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 6 5 20 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 16 20 41 6 RT Flow Rate 19 13 7 21 Approach Flow Rate 98 44 126 32 Proportion LT 0.16 0.45 0.33 0.19 Proportion RT 0.19 0.30 0.06 0.66 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 44 98 32 126 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 158 158 142 142 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.33 0.15 0.42 0.11 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.15 0.33 0.11 0.42 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 20 16 6 41 RT, Opposing Approach 13 19 21 7 LT, Conflicting Approaches 47 47 36 36 RT, Conflicting Approaches 28 28 32 32 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.45 0.16 0.19 0.33 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.30 0.19 0.66 0.06 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.18 0.18 0.23 0.23 Approach Capacity 416 429 661 406 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 98 416 0.24 2.4 A SB 44 429 0.10 1.5 A EB 126 661 0.19 2.1 A WB 32 406 0.08 1.3 A Intersection Delay = 2.0 Level of Service (Intersection) = A 411 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT4C1PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 2th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour INT4C1PM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------- ----------------- Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes . 10 22 16 38 25 45 28 52 11 13 85 16 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 11 40 29 14 RT Flow Rate 17 47 12 17 Approach Flow Rate 51 113 96 120 Proportion LT 0.22 0.35 0.30 0.12 Proportion RT 0.33 0.42 0.13 0.14 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 113 51 120 96 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 216 216 164 164 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.13 0.30 0.25 0.32 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.30 0.13 0.32 0.25 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 40 11 14 29 RT, Opposing Approach 47 17 17 12 LT, Conflicting Approaches 43 43 51 51 RT, Conflicting Approaches 29 29 64 64 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.35 0.22 0.12 0.30 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.42 0.33 0.14 0.13 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.20 0.20 0.31 0.31 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 0.39 0.39 Approach Capacity 400 474 591 551 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 51 400 0.13 1.6 A SB 113 474 0.24 2.5 A EB 96 591 0.16 1.9 A WB 120 551 0.22 2.3 A Intersection Delay = 2.1 Level of Service (Intersection) = A 1 1 1 0 : iiikott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers ...„,..... e ..... , t...., ,I 1 t ' . 7 'i......•'''' •.; 'i r'. ' '.': ' ," . " .. ,.. • I ! :.s. . ., ,. . , • ./ HCM Data Worksheets - Existing plus 6th Street No Westbound Past Commercial Condition • • - •±4 . .4. - • • ;,• 10. .: f ,:iy..,..3.4 ,....,. :.. i '''' . • ',,,. r '.e:t-'1--: s---.. - - ' f. - ; ., 1 .. ,..,-: •sfj. 4t.'-.AVy...1.2.? ...: s. 4 .4 ' tr ,.••• ' , ' .1, j..1: :. .^ ' :4 i 1 .• 17 • • ,. ... ...,e ..x,.. " 4, .: :. „ Cr.' ' r., - :.. ,. i. "-e-,- c t, . ., - 41 ' r . , - Iii ' ' ,.., 4. - " • -; • -,.. 4, i, • r 1 / 1.. , A ' I : ; • . A .4. • • 'r•- ' ;44 • •:•1 • • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT1C2AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 8th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 5/4/98 Other Information With 6th Street No WB Past Commercial AM Peak Hour INT1C2AM All -way Stop -controlled. Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 50 203 28 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 6 48 29 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 99 182 38 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 8 83 16 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate , 53 6 104 8 RT Flow Rate 29 31 40 17 Approach Flow Rate 296 88 336 112 Proportion LT 0.18 0.07 0.31 0.07 Proportion RT 0.10 0.35 0.12 0.15 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 88 296 112 336 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 448 448 384 384 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.36 0.11 0.40 0.13 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.11 0.36 0.13 0.40 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 6 53 8 104 RT, Opposing Approach 31 29 17 40 LT, Conflicting Approaches 112 .112 59 59 RT, Conflicting Approaches 57 57 60 60 Proportion LT,Opposing Approach 0.07 0.18 0.07 0.31 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.35 0.10 0.15 0.12 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.15 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.16 Approach Capacity 543 384 608 449 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 296 543 0.55 7.9 B SB 88 384 0.23 2.4 A EB 336 608 0.55 8.2 B WB 112 449 0.25 2.6 A Intersection Delay = 6.7 Level of Service (Intersection) = B • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT1C2PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 8th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 5/4/98 Other Information With 6th Street No WB Past Commercial PM Peak Hour INT1C2PM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O > 1 < 0 49 84 13 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 24 123 99 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 31 87 27 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 24 145 17 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 52 25 33 25 RT Flow Rate 14 104 28 18 Approach Flow Rate 154 258 153 196 Proportion LT 0.34 0.10 0.22 0.13 Proportion RT 0.09 0.40 0.18 0.09 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 258 154 196 153 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 349 349 412 412 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.20 0.34 0.20 0.26 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.34 0.20 0.26 0.20 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 25 52 25 33 RT, Opposing Approach 104 14 18 28 LT, Conflicting Approaches 58 58 77 77 RT, Conflicting Approaches 46 46 118 118 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.10 0.34 0.13 0.22 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.40 0.09 0.09 0.18 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.17 0.17 0.19 0.19 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 0.29 0.29 Approach Capacity 581 487 491 500 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 154 581 0.27 2.7 A SB 258 487 0.53 7.5 B EB 153 491 0.31 3.3 A WB 196 500 0.39 4.4 A Intersection Delay = 4.9 Level of Service (Intersection) = A • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C2AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 5/4/98 Other Information With 6th Street No WB Past Commercial AM Peak Hour INT2C2AM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection (E -W) 6th Street No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O 1 < 0 246 2 .95 .95 Southbound L T R O > 1 0 25 60 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R O 0 0 Westbound L T R 0 > 0 < 0 1 28 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 0 26 1 RT Flow Rate 2 0 29 Approach Flow Rate 261 89 30 Proportion LT 0.00 0.29 0.03 Proportion RT 0.01 0.00 0.97 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 89 261 0 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 30 30 350 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.69 0.23 0.08 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow. Rate 0.23 0.69 0.00 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 0 LT, Opposing Approach 26 0 0 RT, Opposing Approach 0 2 0 LT, Conflicting Approaches 1 1 26 RT, Conflicting Approaches 29 29 2 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.29 0.00 0.00. Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.01 0.00 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.03 0.03 0.07 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.97 0.97 0.01 Approach Capacity 1143 1097 258 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 261 1143 0.23 2.4 A SB 89 1097 0.08 1.4 A WB 30 258 0.12 1.6 A Intersection Delay = 2.1 Level of Service (Intersection) = A 111 Intersections Release 2.1d �INT2C2PM.HCO Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized to Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 6th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 5/4/98 Other Information With 6th Street No WB Past Commercial PM Peak Hour INT2C2PM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R 0 1 < 0 158 14 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 0 19 129 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R O 0 0 Westbound L T R O > 0 < 0 2 4 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 0 20 2 RT Flow Rate 15 0 4 Approach Flow Rate 181 156 6 Proportion LT 0.00 0.13 0.33 Proportion RT 0.08 0.00 0.67 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 156 181 0 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 6 6 337 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.53 0.45 0.02 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.45 0.53 0.00 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 0 0 0 0 LT, Opposing Approach 20 15 0 RT, Opposing Approach 20 LT, Conflicting Approaches 2 2 RT, Conflicting Approaches 4 4 15 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.13 0.00 0.00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.08 0.00 Proportion LT, -Conflicting Approaches 0.33 0.33 0.06 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.67 0.67 0.04 Approach Capacity 1008 1041 213 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 181 1008 0.18 2.0 A SB 156 1041 0.15 1.8 A WB 6 213 0.03 1.1 A Intersection Delay = 1.9 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS: Unsi nalized Intersections Release 2.1d • NT3C2AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 5th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 5/4/98 Other Information With 6th Street No WB Past Commercial AM Peak Hour INT3C2AM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s (%) SU/RV's (o) CV's (%) PCE's Northbound L T R O 1 < 0 N 174 22 .95 .95 0 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 35 37 .95 .95 0 1.10 0 N Eastbound L T R O 0 0 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 1 0 77 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C2AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 194 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1104 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1104 Prob. of Queue -Free •State: 0.92 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 206 1367 1367 0.97 1700 0.97 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 270 787 0.97 763 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 270 739 O .97 O .97 O .97 716 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C2AM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95%- Flow 5%Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 1 716 > WB T 0 763 > 1097 3.6 0.2 A 3.6 WB R 89 1104 > SB L 41 1367 2.7 0.0 A Intersection Delay = 1.1 sec/veh 1.3 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d •INT3C2PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 5th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 5/4/98 Other Information With 6th Street No WB Past Commercial PM Peak Hour INT3C2PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's Northbound Southbound L T R L T R 0 1< 0 0> 1 0 N N 103 16 38 100 .95 .95 .95 .95 0 0 1.10 Eastbound L T R O 0 0 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 14 0 23 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C2PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 116 1209 1209 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 125 1495 1495 0.97 1700 0.97 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 262 795 0.97 770 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 262 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 747 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 724 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C2PM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 17 724 > WB T 0 770 > 956 3.9 0.0 A 3.9 WB R 26 1209 > SB L 44 1495 2.5 0.0 A Intersection Delay = 0.8 sec/veh 0.7 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d IIIINT4C2AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 2th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 5/4/98 Other Information With 6th Street No WB Past Commercial AM Peak Hour INT4C2AM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O > 1 < 0 15 60 18 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R O > 1 < 0 19 10 12 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 39 74 7 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 6 5 24 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 16 20 41 6 RT Flow Rate 19 13 7 25 Approach Flow Rate 98 44 126 36 Proportion LT 0.16 0.45 0.33 0.17 Proportion RT 0.19 0.30 0.06 0.69 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 44 98 36 126 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 162 162 142 142 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.32 0.14 0.41 0.12 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.14 0.32 0.12 0.41 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 20 16 6 41 RT, Opposing Approach 13 19 25 7 LT, Conflicting Approaches 47 47 36 36 RT, Conflicting Approaches 32 32 32 32 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.45 0.16 0.17 0.33 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach. 0.30 0.19 0.69 0.06 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.29 0.29 0.25 0.25 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.20 0.20 0.23 0.23 Approach Capacity 419 432 678 414 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 98 419 0.23 2.4 A SB 44 432 0.10 1.5 A EB 126 678 0.19 2.0 A WB 36 414 0.09 1.4 A Intersection Delay = 2.0 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS: Unsignalized IntWsections Release 2.1d INT4C2PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 2th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 5/4/98 Other Information With 6th Street No WB Past Commercial PM Peak Hour INT4C2PM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O > 1 < 0 10 22 16 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R O > 1 < 0 38 25 40 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R O , > 1 < 0 28 52 11 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 13 85 21 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 11 40 29 14 RT Flow Rate 17 42 12 22 Approach Flow Rate 51 108 96 125 Proportion LT 0.22 0.37 0.30 0.11 Proportion RT 0.33 0.39 0.13 0.18 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 108 51 125 96 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 221 221 159 159 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.13 0.28 0.25 0.33 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.28 0.13 0.33 0.25 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 40 11 14 29 RT, Opposing Approach 42 17 22 12 LT, Conflicting Approaches 43 43 51 51 RT, Conflicting Approaches 34 34 59 59 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.37 0.22 0.11 0.30 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.39 0.33 0.18 0.13 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.19 0.19 0.32 0.32 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.15 0.15 0.37 0.37 Approach Capacity 388 468 600 555 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 51 388 0.13 1.6 A SB 108 468 0.23 2.4 A EB 96 600 0.16 1.8 A WB 125 555 0.23 2.4 A Intersection Delay = 2.1 Level of Service (Intersection) = A I May 7, 198 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENT TO COASTAL PERMIT FOR PREFERENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM AND LETTERS FROM RESIDENTS REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE PREFERENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Recommendation: 1. That the City Council receive the Notice of Intent to Issue an Amendment to Permit and direct the City Manager to execute it and return it to the Coastal Commission; and, 2. Provide direction to staff on how to implement the program. Background: The City Council approved changes in the Preferential Parking Program, operational hours of parking meters, installation of meters on upper Pier Avenue and elimination of the 2am to 6am parking prohibition without a permit. An application was prepared and submitted to the Coastal Commission to amend our existing permit. The Commission approved, without any modifications, the program submitted by the City on April 7, 1998. The execution of the acknowledgement is the last step in this process. Several people in some of the areas included in the Preferential Parking area spoke at your last meeting requesting that the program not be changed in certain areas or changed in a way to be more flexible on a neighborhood -by -neighborhood basis. Staff would suggest that we meet with residents from the affected area to see if we can come up with a plan that meets each areas needs. Respectfully submitted, Step en R. Burrell City Manager 8 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES *NCY PETE WILSON, Govemor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 (562) 590-5071 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE AMENDMENT TO PERMIT April 17, 1998 On 7 April 1998, the California Coastal Commission granted to City of Hermosa Beach an amendment to Coastal Development Permit 5-84-236, subject to the conditions attached, for changes to the development or conditions imposed on the existing permit. The development originally approved by the permit consisted of: Implementation of preferential parking and remote beach parking program including but not limited to placement of kiosks, signs, and improvement of two parking lots for 150 and 50 cars, respectively. Project will affect 1300 parking spaces. at: Pier Avenue, between Valley Drive and Monterey Boulevard; the area bounded by The Strand, Morningside Drive (north of Pier Avenue) and Loma Drive (south of Pier Avenue) to the east, and the City limits to the north and south. Changes approved by this amendment consist of: Amend preferential parking program to change the permit restricted hours from 8 am to 5 pm to 10 am to lOpm; eliminate parking prohibition without a permit from 2 am to 6 am; enforce parking restrictions for "yellow" and "silver" meters from 10 am to 12 midnight; and install two hour maximum parking meters along upper Pier Avenue which is currently subject to two hour parking limits. Unless changed by the amendment, all conditions attached to the existing permit remain in effect. The amendment is being held in the Commission office until fulfillment of the Special Conditions of the underlying permit and/or conditions of previous amendments imposed by the Commission. Once these conditions have been fulfilled, the amendment will be issued. Four your information, all the imposed conditions are attached. Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commission on April 17, 1998. PETER M. DOUGLAS Executiv- D' = tor By: Al J. Padilla Title: Coastal Program Analyst 1 • • ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have read and understand the Notice of Intent to amended Coastal Development Permit 5-84-236 including all conditions imposed. SPECIAL CONDITIONS NONE AJP:bII 84236a1n c:\msoffice\winword\template\mamnoi.dot Printed on April 17, 1998 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES ICY PETE WILSON, Govemor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 (562) 590-5071 AMENDMENT TO COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 5-84-236-A1 April 17, 1998 Permit Number 5-84-236 issued to City of Hermosa Beach for: Implementation of preferential parking and remote beach parking program including but not limited to placement of kiosks, signs, and improvement of two parking Tots for 150 and 50 cars, respectively. Project will affect 1300 parking spaces. at: Pier Avenue, between Valley Drive and Monterey Boulevard; the area bounded by The Strand, Morningside Drive (north of Pier Avenue) and Loma Drive (south of Pier Avenue) to the east, and the City limits to the north and south has been amended to include the following change: Amend preferential parking program to change the permit restricted hours from 8 am to 5 pm to 10 am to lOpm; eliminate parking prohibition without a permit from 2 am to 6 am; enforce parking restrictions for "yellow" and "silver" meters from 10 am to 12 midnight; and install two hour maximum parking meters along upper Pier Avenue which is currently subject to two hour parking limits. This amendment will become effective upon return of a signed copy of this form to the Commission office. Please note that the original permit condition unaffected by this amendment are still effect. PETER M. DOUGLAS Executive Director By: Al J. Padilla Title: Coastal Program Analyst ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have read and understand the above permit and agree to be bound by the conditions as amended of Coastal Development Permit 5-84-236. Date: Signature • AMENDMENT TO COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Page: 2 5 -84 -236 -Al SPECIAL CONDITIONS: NONE c:\msoffice\winword\template\amend.dot Printed on April 17, 1998 SINE BY: • 4-28-98 ;11:23AM ; April 28, 1998 310 544107-,( 310 ) 376-9380 ;# 1/ 1 TO: Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: Merna Marshall (and Winston Marshall) RE: Proposed Preferential Parking Restrjctions I will try to keep it short. You've received Coastal Commission approval for the new parking restrictions in the impacted area city-wide, when we all know that there is a small but highly -impacted area of the city adjacent to downtown that has a night-time parking problem that desperately needs addressing. I have walked my neighborhood collecting signatures on a petition asking you to re -think this decision. As I walked, I would say that at least 95% of the people I talked to and got signatures from were unaware ofthe proposed parking restrictions and became passionately irate when told of the impending decision. After much thought, there is only one conclusion to be reached for the reasoning behind such a decision: This action will generate a substantial amount of revenue for the city coffers. Please, Bob, J.R., John, Julie and Sam don't do this. There is no reason why the area that truly is impacted couldn't be determined. That area could be noticed, posted, and enforced. The residents in that area would love you for it. And the residents in the other areas would also be happy. Remember, even though we are small, the areas that don't abut the downtown don't have the same parking problems associated with outsiders. If there is a problem, it's generated solely by residents or their visitors. Don't punish us for having a social life. We should all be allowed to have visitors without playing musical cars or getting a citation. Please rethink and revise your plans BEFORE WS TOO LATE!!! Thanks for listening. Merna (Winston Marshall) 360 -33rd Place Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ha 'ktiA,01,4k( cc: Steve Burrell, City Manager Greg J oyce March 30, 1998 California Coastal Commission South Coast Area PO Box 1450 200 Oceangate,10th Floor Long Beach CA 90802-4416 Commissioners: FAERECEIVED Scerich Wilson APR -1 1998 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE l//1a OrPixidipA Re: Permit No. 5 -84 -236 -Al Regarding the preferential parking program change in hours from 8 am to 5 pm to 10 am to 10 pm. We would recommend retaining the 5 pm end to the period. The other changes are acceptable. We are residents with preferential parking in front of our house. On our block parking generally becomes available late in the afternoon. When we have evening guests, they can park for the evening with the 5 pm end of period. A 10 pm end of period would not allow us to have guests without them having to move their cars every hour or parking some distance away. (We park our cars in our garage and have the one allowed guest parking permit. We have owned and lived in our house since 1990.) We don't know the reason for the change, but we can imagine it is due to the increased use of the downtown establishments. If that is the case We under- stand the 10 pm end of period. However, we think if the 10 pm end of period zone ended say at about 18th Street, that would be accommodated. In any case, there could be a trial period where the areas far from downtown are not changed. Thank you for considering our opinion. If you have any questions, feel free to call or write. Yours truly, Greg Scarich and Joyce Wilson cc: Hermosa City Council ■ 2054 Monterey Boulevard Hermosa Beach CA 90254 310-376-4227 Evenings gscarich @linkline.com • • Dear Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council: We, the undersigned, are students and staff of the South Bay Adult School Parent Education Program whose classes are held Monday - Fridays at North School in Hermosa Beach. The Parent Education program has been in existence since 1952 and currently has over 1000 families from the Hermosa, Manhattan and Redondo Beach enrolled. Classes are held here in Hermosa, in 1Vlanhattan and in Redondo. During our classes, which are held largely between 8:30 a.m. and noon, parents and pre-school children attend class together as adults learn techniques to become better, more effective parents. The parking enforcement changes which you are considering will have a serious negative impact on our program. While we maintain a parking lot with several spaces, we often have parents who need to park on neighboring streets for three hours or less. There is plenty of parking available currently for this except for on Monday and Tuesday mornings when street sweeping forces parking on one side of the street. Extending the one hour limit beyond the current May 15 - September 15th enforcement will make attending class extremely difficult for our students. Residential use of street parking during the morning hours over the winter months is very light. We urge you to reconsider changing parking enforcement in an area which currently has no parking shortage. Sincerely, jaw ko 1Te [d 525 zi_%- �- -'P61 uyti(91) 6243 tYow° aiuL Wittati,�ISI�.F %0 hn4���/ Spirr):,6ingj00-014 d47Crt� ohr)SoY1 I 1 A Zs-k� 1 Novio Bead c2—e\, t„,, be% flAaJJAat 0 -AA -c<-( 64 -41 -(Aft& aim.fetkxa- m =)026Co cn z C T "CI 73 Fr.rr 0, Lf\A)2AAer;14-°". /14,&=?6 /C (c) ee-Ji (9_,,,,esi JucAsc, Cs\ --\f Lk(N, jf:)0141/1 �V li e Zimrnerrncin p,(6)1/1 Prz, 20 47gwo de I p V_f /700 /7G?S.s-G tiR itvG - gc'o c4-9 0277 (S 3 cA g0z-) l us (Pr, Ce9cmdo, C/ 90.2,4_5 211'- ,17a.., 9'0z(-4 e95-4 AZ/z)� /3') - y�., /T?(a4e1 /47/ LI 6'1 )07;col.:( 400 o m 6 9.02 (36 Vi\e,\.\ ( ce4. <;, I R L sig' Ai ,UB '1(2(t'6) 025-0 /te G&/?lda,6 k ,Q/ ''`07 Ca4a'.e-7t. . (T47 200y 1/06r/1c-sr ) CA 9o27& 7-1(2-- 3/-'2 Sf_, /t( ' 0/1- 3 / 35 Paironell4t Ave, Iorronce «} qos Oyu 2D 1/ ° /N11 M3,eAN q°2, CAP DetIll P. etkovuokkAi V_ tgbuil er6 c/a r -i-;3 C�2z N ( a k 'A 6 Cf� 0L77 M � a206 fAo ?Arc\ 00,,ort6 ohcic.„ //yrb )1/ '71\0 200 Olt' 779 g _Kg a LA -4 ..)% bob I 1 e --loge '112 rf-7/7 -t-teOb 4P0 pefrebt--ditproi 17/ )107102 vw+ch" !/19 r'11-0/40 --)14017-viS • • Dear Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council: We, the undersigned, are students and staff of the South Bay Adult School Parent Education Program whose classes are held Monday - Fridays at North School in Hermosa Beach. The Parent Education program has been in existance since 1952 and currently has over 1000 families from the Hermosa, Manhattan and Redondo Beach enrolled. Classes are held here in Hermosa, in Manhattan and in Redondo. During our classes, which are held largely between 8:30 a.m. and noon, parents and pre-school children attend class together as adults learn techniques to become better, more effective parents. The parking enforcement changes which you are considering will have a serious negative impact on our program. While we maintain a parking lot with several spaces, we often have parents who need to park on neighboring streets for three hours or less. There is plenty of parking available currently for this except for on Monday and Tuesday mornings when street sweeping forces parking on one side of the street. Extending the one hour limit beyond the current May 15 - September 15th enforcement will make attending class extremely difficult for our students. Residential use of street parking during the morning hours over the winter months is very light. We urge you to reconsider changing parking enforcement in an area which currently has no parking shortage. Sincerely, C110{ 06/}WUY Joanne- Gco )-67- -eu Y+ - W,842 VORovezi T (2'7 ,eu 14,,t d me- - 3 ao fV j.rC 1n S - a \V"`3-\-• 2x tiontirTbn Lv ( S-4- . 37..3 Fcr 1 e2C Nc• !ba Onkt CYL-✓„L�f.. K? kjulie Pdfut- (tea ((//K 1446 c/1,6 ocevyuditwfutcU vo3 lel a.o4- - 3 515 at/min° k9a) b loz_-27 /62s r- f) 61fe_ R ! a D---7 e ,,2L\01 -cve_s (-r 12-B '1001( 2 ZzK1...ta j.5 1JolkeoJ „if W 6 A 1, ,4\/ u I a 41- 5-r- `71L 34. o'{ /of 17)do . L 7o271 clo►-do ai-1 9O2? ok0 (102,70 oae Dear Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council: We, the undersigned, are students and staff of the South Bay Adult School Parent Education Program whose classes are held Monday - Fridays at North School in Hermosa Beach. The Parent Education program has been in existance since 1952 and currently has over 1000 families from the Hermosa, Manhattan and Redondo Beach enrolled. Classes are held here in Hermosa, in Manhattan and in Redondo. During our classes, which are held largely between 8:30 a.m. and noon, parents and pre-school children attend class together as adults learn techniques to become better, more effective parents. The parking enforcement changes which you are considering will have a serious negative impact on our program. While we maintain a parking lot with several spaces, we often have parents who need to park on neighboring streets for three hours or less. There is plenty of parking available currently for this except for on Monday and Tuesday mornings when street sweeping forces parking on one side of the street. Extending the one hour limit beyond the current May 15 - September 15th enforcement will make attending lass extremely difficult for our students. Residential use of street parking during the morning hours over the winter months is very light. We urge you to reconsider changing parking enforcement in an area which currently has no parking shortage. Sincerely, 1 _. • CL :Qv &tc94iti\ Liao 4; \(J 4 &AGL 0741 51- wniviebvil3e-A6 . 2e1 Norhik -a44.SCA, C98°) TX/6124C. (tel 5u) Gni crtA !� idow -12_8 6L1.0 ,ec4_,45. ek,siA,,4. • • Dear Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council: We, the undersigned, are students and staff of the South Bay Adult School Parent Education Program whose classes are held Monday - Fridays at,North School in Hermosa Beach. The Parent Education program has been in existance since 1952 and currently has over 1000 families from the Hermosa, Manhattan and Redondo Beach enrolled. Classes are held here in Hermosa, in Manhattan and in Redondo. During our classes, which are held largely between 8:30 a.m. and noon, parents and pre-school children attend class together as adults learn techniques to become better, more effective parents. The parking enforcement changes which you are considering will have a serious negative impact on our program. While we maintain a parking lot with several spaces, we often have parents who need to park on neighboring streets for three hours or less. There is plenty of parking available currently for this except for on Monday and Tuesday mornings when street sweeping forces parking on one side of the street. Extending the one hour limit beyond the current May 15 - September 15th enforcement will make attending class extremely difficult for our students. Residential use of street parking during the morning hours over the winter months is very light. We urge you to reconsider changing parking enforcement in an area which currently has no parking shortage. 6,\\ Loco3 Fe t i c € G're . /337<S4 Sincerely,. Lik.^^ (I;5t11 41( 25 60( 33rd 5I u(se4L,,(11SQ�jFe-if 4�ecve.tJ C- �, 6-,a _e oc c/. 6044' f_f OnC41 6 6 1" afil 114 °;./1 L m,:knoicec 1 rwd t:l c l < L .I 31-5r 517 Mlu,l,,a a,, Ma vf9 g. A 0 o- i 0 ,3O) 41 Dot)) Ave gedondo.t i1 ‘1,44& �o Slwy Gr: f/ G��1 /o q 3(s h°s 1.atia ___1_5>e,117L ‘2/ _-__sV-rc- Si � . l M41/ Midi �'ls% 111 Saff hrre end° eet !et11 102 ruw .M-- CiAlk4(1-K4Ota, CAri-41-eikoe_1( aft-tottvst f610a4 atui Ljoituitveit fl?- b Viiitttr4 i ?orit' 14 AJtde. d4-- .,rel 0.2.4 -At ela. A 4 9027r nig S ✓K41- 7 AV e . . 17 . c/ o 4-3"Sr 661 IROW6C0 - 2-001 wrnAy Vel au{ M.13.01oU (o nrt M(kdh,&! ( H -Ds no91.8K Rb4 )e6 < <Z k ZWo ST Ci\ k atak6 Q' ..(4/4,944r- 736 GevcaAiE Cid 9UZS y �{'4/4 `'". 531 HS T �1 ,� H' , p:Pt\ctutiN.‘ 2-410 ii1) St4 viNtift 14g teivi Rig N c s`- Aka 17'0z(0 (61 -C ROCZ t19. 4JQ M..1./Ant i./„2 /9171-. C'1 I"1 9o.1L • • Dear Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council: We, the undersigned, are students and staff of the South Bay Adult School Parent Education Program whose lasses are held Monday - Fridays at North School in Hermosa Beach. The Parent Education program has been in exispnce since 1952 and currently has over 1000 families from the Hermosa, Manhattan and Redondo Beach enrolled. Classes are held here in Hermosa, in Manhattan and in Redondo. During our lasses, which are held largely between 8:30 a.m. and noon, parents and pre-school children attend class together as adults learn techniques to become better, more effective parents. The parking enforcement changes which you are considering will have a serious negative impact on our program. While we maintain a parking lot with several spaces, we often have parents who need to park on neighboring streets for three hours or less. There is plenty of parking available currently for this except for on Monday and Tuesday mornings when street sweeping forces parking on one side of the street. Extending the one hour limit beyond the current May 15 - September 15th enforcement will make attending class extremely difficult for our students. Residential use of street parking during the morning hours over the winter months is very light. We urge you to reconsider changing parking enforcement in an area which currently has no parking shortage. Sincerely, 4' 6L15E )1.) 444 Te-?, spy 2°rrk. St. /fj g (// /OS fl/LG(Zdt4-5 o\ Lmptimit titA_goitioivx--- 0'DT W'/ a..0-r‘Ltitful oiayt,:,V 049//) Ck_QA Weie, 01;5T-K_GwJtAxit-t (?fr e Y -(-.-110b 0.44: i&yLLU4L RAJ -MS "VartnQL- 0/.6-0-L `�Lrola �L J'Gcvtb— CA. '(A/Lex--. ib I �I VooncecS 1 C 64 u- Cir o re z2z3 v{ $oLt 4CLE.M2.Q(if,)-(. . 1211 1 y4" KeywittraN goy P� e - o? /01 We -41 d y u>acj M , 6, oc/1/ i°60SeV 1°Nke' /4, e , acep4octy- floc,c ► ��cY /ii8 V ? 1/ (‘ )47%,e e623 1q z/ 3Osr al o St � � (S1• \JL )1-• I( I?' ((S 5'16'51 2vw G(° 5- 2vw (LhA (J C4/ X26^. Cdr. )2-1�� SlCl(%J iJn�Yvl .8(0__._62?fZESS iakt -i- Si 22(s l" '. _ll Liv 12.6. i (3---Ce-i, X, 6 - 67,414A.Attt, fo i x*.. VI f.° -Pr ' ?j3 erItA-17,-L04-Kb 613 Sl'eAita a E( S-e-sui&az ,/ JO dOhr615r CDC 0 C e C t A 1DK YYllAiNut,r) 61(,11 Z 30-- Sr ,-k-r.0Lh^cr' cS. -E-utS Si-. k - 6.. 02(0/7 GJa- 4-i/f4 - ,_ (00A) /-/A«-- (s Li ci,S 3 S S- nr,a et- -2_ -24-rif CI-, 1--CA/14,1-0 tr(_Cte /7 5 1--(jr)v\I-\eALLK; &IA id_ 0 Y-.1 / //r/vi'Al734%\_. Y-C,offit_ _ 949 /OP May 6, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998 REVISED PROPOSAL FOR A BEACH CONCERT ON SEPTEMBER 19, 1998 Recommendation: That the City Council review the proposal and determine whether or not you wish to change the approval granted at the April 28, 1998 meeting. Background: The City Council, at its meeting of April 28, 1998, approved a contract with STAR 98.7 for a beach concert on Saturday, September 19, 1998. The concert was subject to all normal fees and charges to cover City costs associated with the event. There was a $25,000 minimum fee to be charged for the beach venue. Funds collected would be used to improve the beach drainage. The proposal before you now requests that the City Council modify the approval. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 1 THOMAS BINNION ADVERT TEL No.3796374 May 8,98 10:15 No.003 P.02 • • Advertising d Creative Services 1219 Morningside Drive Manhattan Beach California 90266 310 376 5501 Fax 310 379 6374 Thomas Binnion May 8, 1998 Mr. Steve Burrell City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (By Pax) Dear Steve; Upon further discussions with my client Robert Lyles at radio station Star 98.7 FM concerning the proposed concert on Hermosa Beach on September 19th, he has come to the following conclusion, Since he has not yet booked a group, he has no idea what the group's compensation demands will be. Therefore he wishes to propose to the Hermosa Beach City Council that once all costs associated with the concert, including compensation to the group, have been covered, Hermosa Beach would receive 100% up to the first $10,000, and 50% of everything over and above that. For example, if the net proceeds ended up being $12,000, then rhe City would receive $11,000 for its drainage diversion fund (the first $10,000 4- half of $2,000). As mentioned previously, he will not know what the net proceeds will be until after all is said and done, He will, however, make every effort to get as much for the city as he can. Again, he would like to develop a long term relationship with the city of Hermosa Beach and I assure you he is acting in good faith. Please disregard the previous proposal faxed to you and distribute this proposal to the members of the city council instead. Thanks very much. Sincerely, c.c. - Robert Lyles SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION May 5, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998 VEHICLE LICENSE FEES I Recommendation: That the City Council take a position of opposing repeal of the Vehicle License Fee program. Background: A number of bills are pending in the legislature that would reduce or eliminate the Vehicles License Fee revenues to cities and counties. The total collected statewide is almost $4 billion according to estimates made by the League of California Cities. The majority of the impact is on counties at $2 billion and cities over $1 billion. Hermosa Beach's estimate is $760,000 for the next fiscal year. This, of course, is general fund and would impact the ability to provide a full range of services should it be completely repealed. The City Council would be faced with a significant cost cutting challenge should these funds be removed by action of the state legislature. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 85/65/98 18:14:84411 -> 310 372 6106 osa Beach Page 901 ✓ MAY. 5. 1998 3:06PM LEAGUE OF CAL CITIES NO. 5609 P. 1 �.r9 Jnr Ui I n�l��rl Illi (ilu•� :.: t League of California Cities 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: (916) 658-8200 Fax: (916) 658-8240 www.cacities.org May 5, 1998 URGENT LEGISLATIVE UPDATE -- IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUESTED TO: All City Managers and City Public Information Officers RE: Press Outreach on VLF Legislative Proposals We need your help to increase awareness among local reporters and editorial writers of current legislative efforts to repeal the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) and the devastating impact such a repeal would have on cities' fiscal stability. These legislative measures, which are detailed below, are moving very quickly. Vie must act now if we hope to influence their code and outcome. If the VLF is repealed, cities will lose $1.2 billion annually!! This is twice the amount in property tax revenue that has been shifted away from cities since 1992-93 and 1993-94. ACTION! Specifically, we ask that you immediately: 1. Share the attached fact sheet with your council members to ensure they are well informed on the issue. 2. Calculate how much your city stands to lose if VLF is repealed and what programs and services would specifically be hurt. (To easily calculate that figure, VLF is a loss to cities of approximately $42 per capita.) 3. Use the fact sheet and the information on how much your city would lose to brief the reporters from your local media outlets who cover city issues. 4. Arrange an editorial board visit for a group of officials from your city -- city manager, council member, police chief, fire chief, labor leader -- to discuss the issue. You may want to coordinate this with other cities in your area. 5. Use the attached sample opinion editorial -- or create an original -- for signature by one of your local officials and seek placement of it in the local newspaper(s). Current status of VLF bills • Assembly Bill 1176 (McClintock. R Simi Valley) Will be heard in the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee on Monday, May 11. • Assembly Constitutional Amendment (ACM 45 (McClintock): Introduced on April 29 and must wait 30 days before it can be heard in committee. • Senate Bill 2001 (Hurtt. R -Garden Grove)., Has been sct for hearing in Senate Revenue and Taxation twice and canceled at the request of the author both times. • Senate Bill 1998 (Hurtt): Set for hearing in Senate Revenue and Taxation on May 6. • Senate Bill 1723 alavnes. R-Mutietta): Has been set for hearing in Senate Revenue and Taxation twice and canceled at the request of the author both times. EI/05/90 10:14:41 • -> MAY. 5. 1998 3:07PM LEAGUE OF CAL CITIES z :+' 11, �.aplln' nl. 4•) I rni,l fili •. 310 37Z 6106 lJosa Beach Page 982 NO. 5609 P. 2 League of California Cities 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: (916) 658-8200 Fax: (916) 658-8240 www.cacities.org Why Legislative Efforts to Eliminate the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) Will Hurt California's Communities FACT SHEET Several bills now pending in the state Legislature would repeal the vehicle license fee (VLF). They are Assembly Bill 1776 and Assembly Constitutional Amendment (ACA) 45 (McClintock, R -Simi Valley), Senate Bills 2001 and 1998 (Hunt, R -Garden Grove) and Senate Bill 1723 (Haynes, R- .Murietta). The League of California Cities opposes efforts to eliminate VLF. Even proposals to provide a constitutionally protected replacement revenue source aren't enough. Until all local government revenue sources are constitutionally protected and cannot be manipulated by the state, as outlined in the League -sponsored ACA 42 (Aguiar, R -Chino), none are safe. Specifically, ACA 42 would ensure that local tax dollars stay in the community from which they came, put control over local revenues squarely in the hands of local voters and secure a base of funding that could not be manipulated by the state or used to pay for state programs. Background on VLF • VLF is the fee that those who own registered vehicles pay each year instead of paying local property taxes on their vehicles. It is 2% of the market value of the vehicle. • The VLF is a major revenue source, expected to total nearly $4 billion in 1998-99. More than 90% of VLF goes to cities and counties and benefits the communities they serve. The state DMV receives less than 10% to cover administrative costs. • Of the $3.6 billion in VLF revenue that goes to local government, cities receive $1.2 billion or $42 per capita. The counties' portion of VLF is calculated differently. • VLF accounts for as much as 33% a city's budget and is general purpose or discretionary revenue - - that which is not earmarked for a specific purpose. This is significant because for the average city only 35% of its budget is discretionary and must make up the bulk of funding for police and fire services, libraries, parks, economic development, planning, roads and other essential services. • In 1986, California voters approved Proposition 47, reserving VLF revenue for local government so the state could not take it away. For that reason, VLF is not considered part of the state's general fund and is not at the discretion of state Legislators. Therefore, how it is distributed is not up for debate during budget deliberations every year nor is it the subject of the fierce competition among those who must vie for a piece of the state budget. - over - 85/85/90 10:15:28 • -> 318 372 6106 liosa Beach Page 883 MAY. 5. 1998 3:08PM LEAGUE OF CAL CITIES NO. 5609 P. 3 Why We Oppose Efforts to Eliminate VLF F is a lon - • in : voter-; • ., • ved local enue source • rimaril . . • is • ubli • The state created the VLF in 1935 to replace the personal property tax on motor vehicles, which had been levied and collected by local governments. In 1986, California voters approved Proposition 47 and reserved VLF revenue for local government so the state could not continue to siphon its revenue to pay for state programs. • The average city spends 65% of its discretionary revenue on police and fire. That means the $1.2 billion cities will lose if the VLF is eliminated translates into a $780 million hit statewide to public safety alone. The state's track record tells us we should not bank on its promises of revenue backfill and protection, • The state Legislature has taken billions in local property tax dollars since the early 1990s to help the state budget overcome the effects of the recession. Since the shifts began, cities have lost a net $2.3 billion, counties a net $5.9 billion and special districts a net $1.5 billion. Within 10 - 15 years, the property tax revenue taken by the state will double in value due to strong property tax growth and a healthy economy. • The state's non-partisan Legislative Analyst's Office estimates the state's 1998-99 budget year will close with a surplus of $1.5 billion. More recent estimates calculate that figure at as much as $4 billion. Even when the state's coffers are overflowing, as they are this year, legislators are proposing to take more local government revenue instead of seriously designing ways to return or suspend the local property tax shifts -- despite past promises. • Local government is still hurting from the property tax shifts, Repealing the VLF before the property tax is returned is insult to injury. • Since the late 1970s the state reduced or eliminated a variety of its long-standing revenue sources to cities and counties, resulting in a Loss of more than $300 million a year to cities VLF provides much needed economic diversity to local government. • Because the state has eliminated or reduced several historic local government revenue sources, including property taxes, the VLF has become one of the three most important revenue sources for cities. Ironically, it is the most stable since unlike the others -- sales and property tax -- it does not dramatically rise and fall with the state's often unpredictable economy. Good Politics Don't Ec_uial Good Policy • With a possible $4 billion state budget surplus, proponents of the VLF bills say taxpayers should share in these good times. Then, why not refund a state tax instead of one that benefits local governments who are not enjoying those same good times? What $1.2 Billion Means to Cities The $L2 billion cities would lose if the VLF is repealed equals: • Construction of 400 libraries • Employment of 12,000 police officers • Operation of 1,000 fire engine companies -- staffed around the clock all year • Value of 35,000 acres of developed park land 5/5/98 EI/85/90 18:15:59 4 -> 318 372 6186osa Beach Page 884 MAY, 5, 1998 3:08PM LEAGUE OF CAL CITIES NO, 5609 P. 4 SAMPLE OPINION EDITORIAL (Please have one of your local elected officials author this for placement in your local newspaper.) Local Communities Hurt in Political Game By Good politics don't equal good policy. Good politics are made of quick action, pithy sound bites and seemingly simple solutions. The name of the game is capturing points in the next public opinion poll and votes at the next election. It's about winners and losers. On the other hand, good policy usually requires hard work, solid research and difficult compromises. Good policy considers consequences and seeks a balanced, fair and workable solution to sometimes divisive, always complex, issues and problems. In the end, it holds a little something for everyone. Four bills currently pending in the state Legislature are pure politics. They are Senate Bill 2001 (Hurtt, R -Garden Grove), SB 1998 (Hurtt, R -Garden Grove) and SB 1723 (Haynes, R-Murietta) and Assembly Bill 1776 (McClintock, R -Simi Valley). These bills would repeal the vehicle license fee (VLF). VLF is the fee that those who own registered vehicles pay each year instead of paying personal property taxes on their vehicles. Sound great? Think again. The VLF is one of the state's major revenue sources, expected to total nearly $4 billion in 1998-99. And what most people don't know, yet legislators must understand, is that this revenue doesn't disappear into a large, faceless bureaucracy. Most of the VLF revenue goes to cities and counties and the local communities we serve. Moreover, the VLF revenue cities and counties receive is general purpose or discretionary revenue -- not earmarked for a specific purpose. This is significant because, in the case of cities, discretionary dollars make up the bulk of funding for police and fire services, libraries, parks, economic development, planning, roads and other essential services. In fact, the average city spends 65 percent of its discretionary revenue on police and fire. That means the $1.2 billion cities will lose lithe VLF is eliminated translates into a $780 million hit statewide to public safety alone. We should be investing in our communities, not further limiting their ability to provide local services. The state's non-partisan Legislative Analyst's Office estimates the state's 1998-99 budget year will close with a surplus of $1.5 billion. Proponents of these bills say taxpayers should share in these good times. Then, why not refund or eliminate a revenue source OS/05/90 10:16:35 -> 319 372 6106 ilirosa Beach MAY. 5. 1998 3:09PM LEA E OF CAL CITIES NO, 5609 P. 5 Page 985 primarily dedicated to supporting the state's budget and not those of local governments who are not enjoying those same good times? Local government is not on solid economic ground in large part because the state Legislature has taken billions in local property tax dollars since the early 1990s to help the state budget overcome the effects of the recession. Since the shifts began, cities have lost a net $2.3 billion, counties a net $5.9 billion and special districts a net $1.5 billion, Within 10 - 15 years, the property tax revenue taken by the state will double in value due to strong property tax growth and a healthy economy. In the meantime, local government will continue to struggle to balance their budgets and provide quality local services. Two of the VLF bills direct the Legislature to backfill the VLF revenue local government would lose with money from the state's general fund. However, this is not likely to happen. Even when the state's coffers are overflowing, as they are this year, Iegislators are proposing to take more local government revenue instead of seriously designing ways to return or suspend the local property tax shifts that have gone on too long. The proposal to eliminate the VLF is popular because it's good politics. In fact, it's so good that it is credited as a key component of the successful campaign platform in the last Virginia Governor's race. It's just too bad that healthy, fiscally sound local communities don't make for good state politics. (Please include brief biographical information on the local author) ### • May 6, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998 Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the attached letter from the ABC district office without taking any action. Background: This is the second ABC license amendment that has been processed this year under the new law requiring notification to the impacted city. The amendment submitted by Patrick Malloy's is to remove the ABC prohibition on live entertainment. They have requested permission for live music. Secondly, they would like the food service requirement in the patio area dropped. They state that others do not have to sell food and it is difficult for them to compete. These two proposed amendments are items that the City regulates. Both of the proposed amendments are covered by City regulations, including a CUP. This issue is one that the City communicated to ABC last summer that we would be in the best position to regulate food service and live music rather than ABC. Therefore, I believe that the City Council should receive and file the letter without action. If they wish to have live entertainment or change the conditions concerning outdoor dining, they must receive approval from the City. In the case of live music, they will need an amendment to their CUP. spectfully submitted, Ste n R. Burrell City Manager 8b • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA — BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL Inglewood District Office 1 Manchester Blvd. RECEIVED P.O. Box 6500 Inglewood, CA 90306 (310) 412-6311 APR 2 8 1998 April 27, 1998 Hermosa Beach City Council City Hall Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Council Members: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Certified Letter Z 445-880-044 Re: RO AL INC dba: Patrick Molloy's Restaurant 50 Pier Avenue, #A Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 File #: 47-317239 This is to inform you that pursuant to an amendment to Section 23803 of the Business and Professions Code which became effective January 1, 1998, the Department is require d to notify local governing bodies of any petition to remove or modify conditions on an A.B.C. license. Please be advised that the above -referenced licensee, whose currently licensed premises is within your jurisdiction, has petitioned the Department to remove or modify certain conditions on their alcoholic beverage license. I have enclosed the following items for your information and consideration: 1. A copy of Section 23803 of the Business & Professions Code. 2. A copy of the existing Petition for Conditional License, which contains the license conditions and the grounds for their original imposition. 3. A copy of the licensee's letter describing the conditions the licensee is seeking to remove or modify. According to the provisions of Section 23803 BPC, you have thirty (30) days to file a written objection to the modification / removal of these conditions. If you have any questions or need any additional assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Investigator Eric rata at the above number. fi',1dward Mimiaga, District Administrator EM:fa Enclosure: Original Conditions • • Section 23803 - Business and Professions Code Effective January 1, 1998 Section 23803: Statutes of 1997, Chapter 454: SB 609 (Karnette) Section 23803 has been amended to require the department to notify the local governing body of any petition to remove or modify conditions. The local governing body has 30 days in which to object to the modification or removal. A hearing shall be held on the objection if the department recommends approval of the petition. Section 23803 will read as follows: 23803. The department, upon its own motion or upon the petition of a licensee or a transferee who has filed an application for the transfer of the license, if it is satisfied that the grounds which caused the imposition of the conditions no longer exist, shall order their removal or modification, provided written notice is given to the local governing body of the area in which the premises are located. The local governing body has 30 days to file written objections to the removal or modification of any condition. The department may not remove or modify any condition to which an objection has been filed without holding a hearing as provided in Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. Any petition for the removal or modification of a condition pursuant to this section shall be accompanied by a fee of one hundred dollars ($100). • • BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF RO AL INC } FILE 47-317239 Patrick Molloys Steakhouse } 50 Pier Ave A } Hermosa Beach„ CA 90254 } } } } PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL LICENSE For Issuance of an On -Sale General Eating Place License Under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act WHEREAS, petitioner(s) has/have filed an application for the issuance of the above -referred -to license(s) for the above-mentioned premises; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code, the Department may deny an application for a license where issuance would result in or add to an undue concentration of licenses; and, WHEREAS, the proposed premises are located in Census Tract 6211 where there presently exists an undue concentration of licenses as defined by Section 23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code; and, WHEREAS, the petitioner(s) stipulate(s) that by reason of the aforementioned over concentration of licenses, grounds exist for denial of the applied -for license(s); and, WHEREAS, the issuance of an unrestricted license would be contrary to public welfare and morals; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned petitioner(s) do/does hereby petition for a conditional license as follows, to -wit: 1. Sales, service and consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted only between the hours of 7:00 am to 2:00 am and each day of the week. 2. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee(s) shall be removed or painted over within 48 hours of being applied. 3. The quarterly gross sales of alcoholic beverages shall not exceed the gross sales of food during the same period. The licensee shall at all times maintain records which reflect separately the gross sale of food and the gross sales of alcoholic beverages of the licensed business. Said records shall be kept no less frequently than on a quarterly basis and shall be made available to the Department on demand. 4. The subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public premises type license nor operated as a public premises. 5. The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted on the ABC -257 dated 2/20/96 and ABC -253 dated 2/20/96. 6. The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises is strictly prohibited. 7. Loitering is prohibited on or around these premises. 8. There shall be no live entertainment of any type, including but not limited to live music, disc jockey, karaoke, topless entertainment, male or female performers or fashion shows. Initals 7,e/;,g ti 4V1 47317239 'RO AL INC Page 2 9. There shall be no dancing allowed on the premises at any time. 10. The rear door(s) shall be kept closed at all times during the operation of the premises except in cases of emergency, product deliveries and to allow for patron(s) to enter and exit. The use of a screen or security door shall constitute a violation of the this condition. 11. Entertainment provided shall not be audible beyond the area under control of the licensee. This petition for conditional license is made pursuant to the provisions of Sections 23800 through 23805 of the Business and Professions Code and will be carried forward in any transfer at the applicant -premises. Petitioner(s) agree(s) to retain a copy of this petition on the premises at all times and will be prepared to produce it immediately upon the request of any peace officer. The petitioner(s) understand(s) that any violation of the foregoing condition(s) shall be grounds for the suspension or revocation of the license(s). DATED THIS 72 DAY OF Applicant/Petitioner ABC -172 (5/94) DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF BEFORE THE RO AL INC dba: Patrick Molloy's Steakhouse 50 Pier Avenue, Ste A Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 } } } } } FILE 317239 REG. PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL LICENSE For the premises expansion of an On -Sale General Eating Place license under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act WHEREAS, petitioner(s) has/have filed a request to expand its licensed privileges of the above -referred -to license(s) for the above-mentioned premises; and, WHEREAS, the petitioner(s) desire to sell, sereve and permit patron(s) to consume alcoholic beverages on an exterior patio; and, WHEREAS, the Department has expressed concerns of the petitioner(s) ability to control the activity of patron(s) in said patio; and, WHEREAS, the Department has expressed concerns that the petitioner will not operate as a bona fide eating place on said patio; and, WHEREAS, the petitioner wishes to mitigate the aforementioned concerns of the Department; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned petitioner(s) do/does hereby petition for a conditional license as follows, to -wit: 01. Whenever the petitioner(s) is exercising licensed privileges on the patio, alcoholid beverages shall be made only in conjunction with the sale of food to the person ordering the beverage on said patio. 02. On the exterior patio, the petitioner(s) shall serve full and complete meals in compliance with Section 23038 of the Business and Professions Code until 10:00 pm, each day of the week 03. The licensee(s) or an employee of the licensee(s) will be present in this patio, at all times that alcoholic beverages are being served or consumed on said patio. 04. On the exterior patio, the petitioner shall only serve alcoholic beverages to patrons who are seated at a dining table. 05. The boundaries of this patio will be clearly defined and designated by physical barriers to separate it from the public sidewalk and adjacent private property which is not under the exclusive control of the licensee(s). These barriers and boundaries, as approved and designated on ABC -257, shall not be changed without prior approval of the Department Of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Initials: • Page 2 317239 RO AL INC Page 2 This petition for conditional license is made pursuant to the provisions of Sections 23800 through 23805 of the Business and Professions Code and will be carried forward in any transfer at the applicant -premises. Petitioner(s) agree(s) to retain a copy of this petition on the premises at all times and will be prepared to produce it immediately upon the request of any peace officer. • The petitioner(s) understand(s) that any violation of the foregoing condition(s) shall be grounds for the suspension or revocation of the license(s). DATEDDTHIS? DAY OF, 19 9-7 A/p'1icant/Pa`t� g er ABC -172 (5/94) 1111 PAT?UCK MOLLOY'S 50A PIER AVE. HERMOSA BCH CA 90254 310 798 9762 FAX 310 798 241 0 Mr. Edward Mimiaga Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control Inglewood District Office PO Box 6500 Inglewood, CA. 90306 Re: license #47- 317239 Dear Mr. Mimiaga, This letter is a request to change two conditions on our current conditional use permit. 1) Condition # 8 " There shall be no live entertainment of any type, including but not limited to live music, disc jockey, karaoke, topless entertainment, male or female performers or fashion shows" We would like to have the option to have live music. 2) In regards to conditions for sale of alcoholic beverages on patio Condition #1 " Whenever the petitioner(s) is exercising licensed privileges on the patio, alcoholic beverages shall be made only in conjunction with the sale of food to the person ordering the beverage on said patio" Do to some of our neighboring competitors not ha alcoholic purchases, we have found it hard to compete and would like toto sell food inn equestnwith having the option of serving alcoholic beverages without food purchase until 11:00 PM Thank you for your time and consideration, If you have any questions I can be reached 310 798 9762 THE CITY OF HERMOSA, BEACH, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A. SUBDIVISION OF LOT '11,• BLOCK 54; FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH; AS PER MAP RECORDED IN;,BOOK .1,, PAGES 59 AND. 60 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE, OF THE; -`COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.. FOR CONDOMINIUM = PURPOSES SUBDIVIDERFS STATEMENT:- -1' HEREBY -STATE THAT -1 AM THE SUBDIVIDER OF THE. LANDS' INCLUDED WITHIN SUBDIVISION SHOWN- ON THIS MAP WITHIN . THE DISTINCTIVE' BORDER LINES. • AND I :_ ":CONSENT TO THE' PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID' MAP AND- SUBDIVISION. 410N7E: Jria/AA/5 STATE OF CALtFdRNIR } SS COUNTY- OF LOP: ANGELES ON THIS 6f DAY OF 177J`69��V`<V..,. .'1997, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNEQ, PERSONALLY APPEARED Haarr 1VZ1.4M1 PERSONALLY' KNOWN • TO MEI OR PROVED Td -ME"Ot't THE BASIS or SATISFACTOfV? EVIDENCE TO BE. THE. PERSON,- WHOSE- NAME; IS: , ._...,,•, . SUBSCRIBED TO- THE'' WITHIN. -INSTRUMENT. AND ACKNOWLEDGED: TO' ME THAT' HE EXECUTED . ?.'. =THE' SAME .IN HIS' AUTHORIZED' CAPACITY, AND :THAT BY HIS' SIGNATURE ON THE -INSTRUMENT • THE PERSON OR:THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF' OF WHICH THE 'PERSON ACTED EXECUTEDTHE- T INSTRUMENT. ; . • SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: THIS'. MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR, UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA IN CONFORIUNCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF .THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND- LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF VIRGIL BOURGON IN JUNE;, 1997: I HEREBY STATE THAT.. THIS. PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE. APPROVED OR CO 10 R tkAPPROVED TENTATIVE MAP,', IF ANY. • f , J:%F c;)-/-,)," ' .11 1 _eT . 1211 CO 'Oct. v3 " NORMAN S. GREEN, L.S. 5909 EXPIRES:. 12-31-00 KAREN M» OWENS . NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF, LOS ANGELES MY COMMI5510N EXPIRES MARCH 15;;' 1999 • KAREN M. OWENS NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA,- - ' RECOTA..FROM: FIRST ADDITION TO. .HERMOSA .BEACH,, MAP .BOOK 1, PAGES' 59, AND- 60, RECORDS' OF LOS ANGELES CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE: t HEREBY: CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT IT CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERAT1ONS..THEREOF;'• THAT: ALL PROVISIONS' OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES- OF THE-CITY'OF.HERMOSA-BEACH .' 'APPLICABLE AT -THE TIME. OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE` MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED`. WITH; " AND • THAT 1 AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP;, IS WITHT TO`CITY RECORDS.. COUNTY. EXr.C-30-ol CITY- TREASURER'S 'CERTIFICATE:. " t HEREBY CEfi'TTFY THAT ALL SPECIAL "ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE JURISDICTION. OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA' -BEACH TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED iN .THE- WITHIN SUBDIVISION OIC: ANY. PART THEREOF' IS SUBJECT. AND WHICH MAY • BE7 PIAID, iN FULL HAVE, BEEN- PAID IN FULL. , • HARRY W. STONE CITY ENGINEER ATE• '.: 4-2(-:9,9 BY 1. , -/J. 01-.. •EPUTY Y" NGINEER R.C.E::NO. f(5'7G.5 SECRETARY OF PLANNING CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED MAP CONFORMS SUBSTANTIALLY .TO T1iE TENTATIVE MAP . APPROVED' BY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE - • • - DAY OR '.-1997.:- ' CONDOMINIUM. NOTESi', THIS SUBDIVISION IS APPROVED ASA CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR •3 UNITS WHEREBY THE OWNERS OF THE.UNITS OF: AIR SPACE WILL HOLD AN•UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN :THE - COMMON AREA WHICH. WILL; IN:TURN,. PROVIDE, THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FORTHEUNITS: EASEMENT:NOTES ,' ; EASEMENT OF WARREN GILLELEN,. FOR. WATER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. PER DEED RECORDED JUNE 27, 1902 IN. BOOK :1617,. PAGE- 47;. OF. DEEDS SAID:EASEMENT-IS BLANKET IN NATURE. BY: SECRETARY- OF PLANNING OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH;, CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY, THAT :THE' CHOF THE CITY OE- HERMOSA BEAC14, BY MOTION: ' ADOPTED; AT. ITS. SESSION ON.THE - DAY -OF' • 1997, APPROVED THE ANNEXED MAP. --- - FOUND 4 AK. ' STRADDLERS NQ REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS CA -INT: , BY: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY., OF HERMOSA; BEACH RECORD OWNER IS: OCEAN ESTATE HOMES, A_CALIFORNIA'GENERAL PARTNERSHIP t ••FV< lY CERT i 's' �rtR:T `15:CITRI Y `.N :F(R•A5+.�t1.N'T.C5 SoOL� it.t4 Ogr•1 rit._.i) 7 rt{.not • ::1_`,3i 1.3rtiP.zPOA?!?OrSU?TINYii'}1iS:;E:',- ..:7:OtiT'I{;P i.:;i'AQCRLRS :X9TV PO4 Cr TAX?3 .,71'T>EC AI RSS;.$.:",3?141.3CCi.t. uT ^.4' TAF13CN17.$"• - 1ra Si?f tii4 011 YV1R:. P 4r T:T• `a- /PAR a M.AP "u. ._. 46 . . A3 9 TiivtR0 2YLAV. r tvinnrr 077IC1cP,r,?.,;'"t:S CP 'F?IE ro:r..rw ' OF Siir31i”p. vs' 1r. 00041"1 OP Lori 417750'00'E, 1 - 100.00' 7,3'F.a`j"1„7;1YT1;APAl.I.CS RTI?ICATESSA1M.Nktre. 4)0 c,,POS tS RAV: 13$F1; MADS TOA? AFL' C:;';?ar_.t=ISI.Om CrSF.CTICN!,$F4Pz ; 5•49305' "lir StrilDIfl5ION MAP ACT.. - • • XV.:4"71'/E O??(CT—rLr'IS OP 'NES g6A Ta C`A ::;'? '.. E>rjt B UT 't'L+F. cm -nu •-0F' iC3 • Tit 0? N7750'00T 100.00' )Rir.;g 4- D./- 9 r NORTHERLY LINE CF LOT T"0, BLOCK 54 FIRST ADO!VON TO HERMOSA BEACH, • MB. 1/59-60 FOUND' SPIKE & WASNER "L$ 4142' NO lteE. ACCEPTED AS C/1:' INT. INDICATES THE BOUNDARY. OF: THE. LAND BEING: . SUBDIVIDED ',BY' THIS MAP: • a,n PRINTED APR 7;i:f`}$