Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05/28/98
bd1/6 "The noblest motive is the public good." AGENDA ADJOURNEDREGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Thursday, May 28, 1998 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK Sam Y. Edgerton Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Robert Benz John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER John Bowler Stephen R. Burrell Julie Oakes CITY ATTORNEY J. R. Reviczky Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MAYOR'S COMMENTS / ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESENTATIONS: PROCLAMATIONS: 1 CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF MAY 12, 1998: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Members of the public wishing to request the removal of an item from the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; 3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 4) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter and petition from 3rd Street residents requesting changes to 3rd Street and Ocean View Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: Consider request and direct staff as deemed appropriate. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under AgendaItem 3, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on May 12, 1998. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. • (d) Recommendation to receive and file the April 1998 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to approve event contract between the City of Hermosa Beach and Hawthorne Savings to present three free community concerts on the beach: July 12, 19 and 26 from 6:OOpm to dusk and approve program outline. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 18, 1998. (f) Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of May 19, 1998. (g) Recommendation to receive and file Caltrans report relative to the request for a traffic signal at Pacific Coast Highway and 16th Street and authorize the City Traffic Engineer to request Caltrans' consideration of higher visibility crosswalks using state of the art technology at this location. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 20, 1998. (h) Recommendation to authorize removal of covenant prohibiting sale of lots separately at 514-518 Pier Ave./1184 Cypress. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 18, 1998. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR (CC) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MD) AND ZONE CHANGE FROM SPAT (SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7) TO R-2, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 635 AND 705 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 19, 1998. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approve the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based upon previous City Council action on a recent similar Zone Change and General Plan Amendment request, deny the request. 5' 41 • • RECONSIDERATION OF TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 840 15TH STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 18, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Sustain the Planning Commission's approval of the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map with the provision that the project be developed in conformance with the attached revised plans submitted and dated May 21, 1998. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. TRAFFIC STUDY - 6TH STREET WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. (Continued from meeting of May 12, 1998). Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 20, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. 7. LORETO PLAZA - LEASE OF ADDITIONAL AIRSPACE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 21, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Determine whether or not to lease additional airspace; and, 2) If City Council decides to lease the additional airspace, City Manager be directed to contract for the appraisal upon payment of the deposit and direct that the lease be revised to reflect Council's decision. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. HERMOSA BEACH CITY -SCHOOL DISTRICT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 18, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Approve establishment of a Hermosa Beach City - School District Partnership and select two Councilmembers as representatives. b. ASSEMBLY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 42 SPONSORED BY THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 20, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Support the passage of ACA 42 so that it will appear on the November 1998 ballot and direct the letters be sent to Senator Dills and Assemblywoman Bowen. 4 • • 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS UPCOMING EXPIRATION OF TERMS - CIVIL SERVICE BOARD Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 20, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Immediately advertise and request applications from interested parties for one Civil Service Board term that will expire July 15, 1998, with appointment to be made at the regular Council meeting of July 14, 1998. 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Mayor Pro Tem Benz to consider holding a recognition dinner for the top 20 sales tax producers in the Hermosa Beach. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on May 12, 1998. 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 4181-024-900 (Southeast corner of 27th St. & Manhattan Ave.) Negotiating Parties: Stephen Burrell Mark Walther Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL Initiation of Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(c) Consideration of joining amicus brief, at no cost to the City, in the following two cases: a. Monterey Dunes, Inc. v. City of Monterey, United States Supreme Court, Case No. 97-1235 b. Kobzoff v. Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Case No. B099100 5 • • ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT TO BUDGET WORKSHOP SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY, JUNE 1, 1998 AT 7:10PM. 6 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Thursday, May 28, 1998 - 7:10 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 7:12pm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Garrison Frost, Jr. - Beach Reporter ROLL CALL: EDGERTON, OAKES, REVICZKY, BOWLER, BENZ (ARRIVED LATE) MAYOR'S COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS: PRESENTATIONS: ) APPROACH B:CHD FOR MORE ........................................................................... UBCOMMI I t I:E VOTE; Q PROCLAMATIONS: CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING OF MAY 12, 1998: NO REPORTABLE ACTIONS. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Don Karasevic: Requested that Public Hearing item #S be heard before item #4. Shirley Cassell: Questioned why SE did not have computer. Questioned letter to editor in Easy Reader regarding hotel project. 1 • 40. Judy Garland: Spoke in opposition to venders located on Pier Ave. at the recent Fiesta de las Artes as they were not arts & crafts related (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter and petition from 3rd Street residents requesting changes to 3rd Street and Ocean View Avenue. JRJSE MOTION TO DIRE .'STA TU STUDY REQUESTS AND RETURN WIT. REPORT.. VOTE; 5 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on May 12, 1998. PULLED BY JR JRIJB MOTION TO AMEND TI'EM #6 flF MINUTES TO SHOW COMMITTEE. VOTE: ; .0 S O. MOTION TO APPROVE.I7 AMENDED. VU` • (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. PULLED BY SE FOR SHIRLEY CASSELL Shirley Cassell: Questioned $1,129.05 bench, payment to Gordon Chong for parking structure, and payment to Leonard Brock. RB QUESTIONED WORKER'S COMP PAYMENTS. CM RESPONDED TO QUESTIONS. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. 2 rr • • (d) Recommendation to receive and file the April 1998 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3) Investment report. (e) Recommendation to approve event contract between the City of Hermosa Beach and Hawthorne Savings to present three free community concerts on the beach: July 12, 19 and 26 from 6:00pm to dusk and approve program outline. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 18, 1998. Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of May 19, 1998. Recommendation to receive and file Caltrans report relative to the request for a traffic signal at Pacific Coast Highway and 16th Street and authorize the City Traffic Engineer to request Caltrans' consideration of higher visibility crosswalks using state of the art technology at this location. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 20, 1998. (h) Recommendation to authorize removal of covenant prohibiting sale of lots separately at 514-518 Pier Ave./1184 Cypress. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 18, 1998. JJ©MOTION To APPROVE STA FF RECOMMENDATION O ONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS.VOTE: 0 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 3 • • PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR (CC) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MD) AND ZONE CHANGE FROM SPAT (SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7) TO R-2, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 635 AND 705 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 19, 1998. JR/SE DECLARED CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND LEFT DIAS 5. RECONSIDERATION OF TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 840 15TH STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 18, 1998. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. TRAFFIC STUDY - 6TH STREET WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. (Continued from meeting of May 12, 1998). Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 20, 1998. JR DECLARED CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND LEFT THE DIAS 7. LORETO PLAZA - LEASE OF ADDITIONAL AIRSPACE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 21, 1998. JB DECLARED CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND LEFT DIAS 4 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. HERMOSA BEACH CITY -SCHOOL DISTRICT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 18, 1998. b. ASSEMBLY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 42 SPONSORED' BY THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 20, 1998. JR SU,PPORTITLE PASSAGE OF . VEMBER 1998BA.LLOT AND DIR SLS A1�H ASSEMBLYWOMAN BO' 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS UPCOMING EXPIRATION OF TERMS - CIVIL SERVICE BOARD Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 20, 1998. VERTISE AN.D REOUL R ONE CIVIL SERVIt WITH APPOINTME15T T JULY 14,1998. VOTE 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Mayor Pro Tern Benz to consider holding a recognition dinner for the top 20 sales tax producers in the Hermosa Beach. CITIZEN COMMENTS 5 • ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on May 12, 1998. 2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 4181-024-900 (Southeast corner of 27th St. & Manhattan Ave.) Negotiating Parties: Stephen Burrell Mark Walther Under Negotiation: Price & Terms of Payment 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL Initiation of Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(c) Consideration of joining amicus brief, at no cost to the City, in the following two cases: a. Monterey Dunes, Inc. v. City of Monterey, United States Supreme Court, Case No. 97-1235 b. Kobzoff v. Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Case No. B099100 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION: 10:55pm RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT TO BUDGET WORKSHOP SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY, JUNE 1, 1998 AT 7:10PM. 6 r • • Hermosa Beach Mayor and City Council Town Hall Hermosa Beach CA. 90254 Y This is a petition from the residents of Third street east of PCH to the top of Hopkins. We are requesting the following two items: We would like City Lot 21 ( currently a small connecting street from Ocean view to Third,) to be made into a small park. The lot is 25' by 90' and is currently used as a throughway for the above residents. All other streets and areas will be unaffected by this since people above Hopkins would continue to use Hopkins, and people who live on Ocean view would still get to their homes the same way through 4th and 5th. We are willing to work with the city on building this park, but we would need funds from the parks proposition to take care of the big things like drainage and pulling up the concrete. We could plant grass, flowers and build a nice wooden swing set for the children to play on. We could even designate part of the area for dog owners. We have contacted city hall to see when and how this city lot became a street, but no one seems to know. It is still listed on the city hall map as a lot, as well as the county records. The best guess public works could give us was because the residents requested it 30 years ago. This was confirmed recently by a neighbors' grandfather. Apparently, the alley that runs between Ocean View and PCH was requested to run through as it was end capped as Ocean View was. This was done, and at the same time the city also did Ocean View, although no residents remember asking for it. Currently the street length allows between 3-4 cars to park along this section of street. This creates a dangerous situation for all of us, the road is two way even though it is not wide enough to be two way with parking. In addition,'it is a blind corner for those making a left onto Ocean View from Third because of the cars (Large trucks and Vans actually) that park there block the view of the driver completley. If the end was capped and a park made, it would still allow 4 spaces but they would be an endcap of Ocean view and along Third street, so we would lose no spaces. (see illustration) The only other concern would be the store with the parking lot accessed by Third. Currently , customers come off 4th street, drive around to Ocean View and then make an illegal turn down a one way street to get to that parking lot. If the city could designate that small area from the commercial lot to PCH as two way it would be better for the businesses as well as the residents of Third. A small partial barricade could be set up with one way signs past that point. This would also help to slow traffic down which likes to rip up our street from PCH to Prospect everyday at 5 PM. This brings us to the second point. After doing a survey in the neighborhood the general consensus for this speeding problems is as follows: Put LONG 5'-6 foot speed bumps in the road to deter traffic from speeding. These are the same bumps used in Beverly Hills and Culver City. Because they are so long it is almost impossible to damage your car. They also are not as high as conventional bumps. These type of speed bumps do not increase noise either because they are so gradual. Continued • • Page two Third street petition. Our street now has children in every other house, it would greatly benefit the community if we had a small park of our own. All one has to do is look at the city map to notice there are way fewer parks in this section of Hermosa than the west and northern parts of Hermosa, less traffic would also increase property values which in turn means more taxes for the city. Our street was not designed many years ago to be a thoroughfare for commuters who don't want to sit on PCH. Since traffic and congestion have changed dramatically in Hermosa over the years, we too have to manage our street to preserve our quality of life we all hold so dear. We have enclosed drawings of out proposed ideas and have included the signatures of all those affected by the proposed changes. Thanks for you time and consideration. Petition Signatures NAME ADDRESS SIGNA URE ¥.4441 TJ7i 7 qZ Sin21,1- 11;rrasA-ach a✓a �Le4 Ni ncl� l�gm (y(n� Igo 3rdsiY'Pek 1-10rmt� - ifiNA �Ir 'U (c i( r ... 'r1 Nide Eris /C/��'p.Ik4 yi 231 3r s4 -re 6tcy rr 1 Tt� f3 c( rd c a,n) . `r C 1?R1 ri 1.1.14) tk g(--A-c_ A 9iY_ GrliOJ�s�.c1,� i 3 � J� �. f 4'W.OFa Bear1/,gozs4- - i Fic.rk,0 q, 6C.cto c ?v( Rol 91/4-1n2 2',l�J✓h be -424 -AM 1 CAl:y 61o9 rC S�ri fntos1 ! 05 De- f s c • i May 18th 1998 Please place on the city councils agenda for the next meeting This addendum is being added to this petition regarding Lot 21 owned by the city, Since it will take a long time to establish a park ( part of the original petition) on that lot we would like the council to handle our safety concerns immediately, we will proceed with the park part of the petition ata later date. Currently lot 21 is 2 Way and allows parking. There are no sidewalks, and parking is allowed on the west side of the street. May of us have come close to being run over as we walk our children and dogs as cars roar around the corner coming up from PCH and turning left onto Ocean View. This problem is compounded by the incredible amount of illegal right turns that take place and the parking that completely blocks the view of the driver headed south towards Third. This Lot was never intended to be a street. It is only 25 by 90 feet. We are requesting that the council help our neighborhood and our children and pets by 1) eliminate parking on City Lot 21. There is plenty of parking on Third since the town made both sides available to park on last year. 2) Place a small barrier on the west side of Ocean view and Third to prevent illegal right hand turns. 3) Turn the endcap of 3" and PCH two way so business traffic doesn't have to drive through our streets to exit the store we would also like a partial wall there similar to 2"d and other streets in this area. Since International News has opened the traffic down our residential street has quadrupled. All the stores have agreed that this would be acceptable to them. This matter needs swift attention. We as a street have been working on this since October of '97. So we could get everyone's imput. Thank you for your attention to this problem. Janet Taranto 906 3" Street Hermosa Beach CA. 90254 310 937-9420--+ RE�tLVED, t PN 1 PUBLIC' ORKS DEPT. • .90 90 90 z W 100 0 7 2/1.84 ® 7 /O.39.OfD. 2//.97 ST c g3Z 536 40 48 4,250f°' 8..10'$' (11 97 105.99• 103.58 <<s0. • r•�eo7.7: ® 9 ,!soli X750/ 22JOt �9 ?D 41 43 gg-9 CI Y 250•'' iw6 3RD .y ?q3 S/7 13-i ST. 9/1 'v 3RD 3Ro,.�/.\ 0.""• 6 v 906 90. 9,1s 94 9: 9/y S''E.9/ 936 q z 93 939 993 9y7 9s7 ST 275-5 S. 68 Cs 63 47 W .3j n • n4 ety Of y41e ' $4-t os.A SERUICE REQtIESC Today's Date/''�` Number , , Type Of.Work Quantity Planned Date Planned ....---;-:iiA.j _, ' V G-! .c. c— •- - -f- /....- f,:� .y* .. .'- _-4.._ F.� _tib., C - OFFICE TELEPHONE # Account /4o. / Crewleader Quantity Completed Date Completed fl • fil .--: - ( c.C, c r LOCATION AND ACTION G%C=` C:,%-E'r-IC.. 3-47 t ''`-- i�:=1- REQUIRED: z- Li'Ct=.�c% 21471 j-.0-�, . ,1---7 .t_' P C, 4-`{ =-,� -Y-%, 1.-.-, t 'C. -C' x�t �i G cc,4t i51 -(.j l/ -e- 1 ��- 6...---. -/.---`%: L i't--_� //,4 (c• i%.--/... G✓ .!> -C4,j x2,-- I./G=r YL ,t��L'.i!., =•(`.L , ,,,a07 �G /e'C.t--G. . , `, . L..e.rte CO�fi? -J =1(,, -cJ .(-i-E- -17. .-0,tI I L__lc,Sf_/ C /. 7,(..,A9.- 7k-=-{4% _ s-t'Cc,1L- L 14-E :/ ,c4,-c..-C—j 17 -)k --s:14, c&. /- i ),.,/ •Y'L_E:.-c1f--- .....%0 _-j(-4:c__. e r /- - C Ci -e -4.,-.c L_ ACTION TAKEN: / CSG L-�f.-,� G•Z&1-e_) ,,'d'; �` vE: ,,a' - ��=� V -Pi 2,- --a, —.��, '/ .a _ -. h-e-cz-es /,ti� /J/ (4yte �-,- '--2W L 10-(-2 /2 a -e eiZd 4-E. C Clot( c ._ 44..4„,/,2e, . moi ,, ��: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, May 12, 1998, at the hour of 7:12 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Merna Marshall, ,resident ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Reviczky, Acting Mayor Oakes Absent: Benz, Mayor Edgerton MAYOR'S COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS: None PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Rosamond Fogg - submitted copies of a press release regarding a community meeting to be held by the Stop Oil Coalition May 20, 1998 at the Clark Building; also submitted copies of a July 29, 1996 Ocean Oil Weekly Report article listing Macpherson Oil and 19 other California offshore operators between 1980 and 1995 who underpaid royalties to the U.S. government because they used a different benchmark price for oil; Con Flatley - expressed concern about the delays pertaining to the Fat Face Fenner's Fishack restaurant issue and questioned the Mayor's removal of the item from tonight's agenda; Steve Kenny - 635 Sixth Street, expressed concern about the FFFFishack issue, saying the delays were not in the best interest of business or fairness; and Gary Vincent - expressed concern that the FFFFishack delays were continuing. (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS: Acting Mayor Oakes said the FFFFishack item was not on tonight's agenda because of Mayor Edgerton's desire to participate, and noted that the issue would be on the next agenda for the May 28, 1998 meeting. Acting Mayor Oakes announced that the Hermosa Beach Firefighters Association's annual pancake breakfast was scheduled for Sunday, May 24, 1998, from 7:30 a.m. to noon at the Fire Station. (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: 1. Letter from Roger Bacon dated April 7, 1998 regarding permits for fundraising activities in Greenwood Park. (Continued from meeting of April 28, 1998) City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9690 la s s City Manager Burrell suggested removing the item from the agenda as Mr. Bacon had requested another continuance. Action: Acting Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council, to continue this item to a future meeting as requested by Roger Bacon. (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) 2. Letter from Laura Somers of the Redondo Union High School '98 Grad Night Committee requesting a donation for the event. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Laura Somers - representing the Redondo Union High School '98 Grad Night Committee, spoke to her request. Action: To approve the same monetary donation of $1,000 to the Redondo Union High School Grad Night Committee as had been previously been granted to the Mira Costa High School Grad Night Committee, since both schools had students from Hermosa Beach as graduating seniors. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz and Mayor Edgerton. 3. Letter from Rosamond Fogg dated April 28, 1998 regarding a request for AQMD study of carcinogenic risk relating to the oil project. Supplemental letter from Macpherson Oil received May 12, 1998. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Rosamond Fogg - 610 Sixth Street, spoke to her letter; asked the City to determine if this study had been undertaken by the AQMD. City Manager Stephen Burrell responded to Council questions and said that he would ask the AQMD to respond to Ms. Fogg's letter. Action: To direct staff to look into the request and to report back to Council once a response on the issue is received from AQMD; also to forward it to the Aspen group. Motion Bowler, second Acting Mayor Oakes. The motion carried, noting absence of Benz and Mayor Edgerton. 4. Letter from Administrative Services Co-op dated Mav_ 1, 1998 requesting discussion of the licensing of taxicabs under the new city code. Action: To receive and file the letter. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz and Mayor Edgerton. City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9691 4 • • 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (1), with the exception of the following item which was removed for discussion in item 3, but is shown in order for clarity: (e) Reviczky. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz and Mayor Edgerton. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on April 28, 1998. Action: To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 28, 1998, as presented. (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 13547 THROUGH 13659, NOTING VOIDED CHECK NOS. 13621 AND 13658. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) (C) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE euruKE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE MARCH, 1998, FINANCIAL REPORTS: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the March, 1998, Financial Reports as presented. (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) (e) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE $850 DONATION FROM BETTY BENOIT MEMORIAL FUND TO THE PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION/PARKS DEPARTMENT TO BE USED FOR THE PURCHASE OF A PARK BENCH AND PLAQUE. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated May 6, 1998. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting in order to recognize the donors and publicly thank them. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to appro- priate the $850 donation from the Betty Benoit Memorial Fund to the Public Works Administration/Parks Department to be used for the purchase of a park bench and plaque. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz and Mayor Edgerton. City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9692 (f) RECOMMENDATION TO WITH HARRIS & ADMINISTRATION AND PARKING STRUCTURE from Public Works 1998. AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR CONTRACT INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE NORTH PIER IN THE AMOUNT OF $275,570. Memorandum Director Harold Williams dated May 5, Action: To approve the staff recommendation to 1) Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Harris & Associates, Inc. for Contract Administration and Inspection Services for the proposed parking structure north of Pier Avenue, in the amount of $275,570 plus $41,335 as a fifteen percent contingency for a total of $316,905; and, 2) Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue addenda as necessary within the budget limitation. (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) (g) RECOMMENDATION TO BREAK THE MUNICIPAL PIER RENOVATION PROJECT INTO TWO PROJECTS; THE MUNICIPAL PIER STRUCTURAL RETROFIT AND THE MUNICIPAL PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES, APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PIER RENOVATION DESIGN CONTRACT WITH HARDING, LAWSON & ASSOCIATES TO BREAK THE PROJECT INTO TWO PHASES AND ADD $4,510 TO THE CONTRACT TO COVER THESE CHANGES; AND ALLOCATE $2,550 IN COUNTY PROP A OPEN SPACE FUNDS TO THE MUNICIPAL PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES PROJECT TO COVER THE COSTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Break the Municipal Pier Renovation Project (CIP 95- 620) into two projects: a) the Municipal Pier Structural Retrofit (CIP 95- 620);and, b) the Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrades (CIP 98-621); 2) Approve an amendment to the Pier Renovation design contract with Harding, Lawson Associates to break the project into two phases, and add $4,510 to the contract to cover these changes; and 3) Allocate $2,550 in County Prop A Open Space Funds(121) to the Municipal Pier Architectural Upgrades Project (CIP 98-621) to cover the costs for architectural renderings. (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) (h) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD FOR THE MUNICIPAL PIER THE AMOUNT OF $187,620; PUBLIC WORKS REJECT ALL THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC NECESSARY WITHIN 10% OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONTRACT RENOVATION TO CONCEPT MARINE IN PRESCRIBE THAT THE DIRECTOR OF OTHER PROPOSALS; AND, AUTHORIZE WORKS TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES AS THE CONTRACT COST. Memorandum City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9693 • • from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve award of the construction management contract for the Municipal Pier Renovation to Concept Marine in the amount of $187,620; 2) Direct that the Director of Public Works reject all other proposals; and 3) Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within ten percent of the contract cost for a total cost of $206,382 . (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) (i) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR THE EDUCATIONAL SITE VISIT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 7, 1998. Action: To approve the staff the City Manager to sign the with The County of Los Angles the educational site visit will provide approximately bursement to the City. (Benz recommendation to authorize Memorandum of Understanding Public Works Department for reimbursement program that $7,000 per year in reim- and Mayor Edgerton absent) (j) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-99 MADE PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO. 98-5907; AND, ADOPT RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE DISTRICT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1998, THROUGH JUNE 30, 1999, AND SETTING JUNE 9, 1998, TO ACCEPT PUBLIC INPUT ON THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 4, 1998. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1. adopt Resolution No. 98-5915, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT IN CONNECTION WITH HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999."; and, 2. adopt Resolution No. 98-5916, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1998-1999 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1998, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1999, AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN RELATION THERETO." (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9694 • s (k) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE $30,000 IN PARK AND RECREATION TAX FUNDS(125) TO COVER COSTS FOR REHABILITATION OF TENNIS AND BASKETBALL COURT SURFACES LOCATED AT THE COMM[JNITY CENTER AND CLARK FIELD. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated May 5, 1998. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to appropriate $30,000 in Park and Recreation Tax Funds(125) to cover costs for rehabilitation and resurface of tennis courts #1 through #4, located at the Community Center and the two tennis and two basketball courts at Clark Field. (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) (1) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP # 24696 FOR 3 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 1550 MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated April 30, 1998. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 98-5917, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #24696 FOR A THREE - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1550 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Item 1(e) was heard at this time but is shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None MUNICIPAL MATTERS 4. MOBILEHOME PARK REGULATIONS - MARINELAND MOBILEHOME PARK. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 7, 1998. Supplemental letter from G. Steven Anderson, attorney for the Marineland Mobilehome Park property owners, received May 12, 1998. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Michael Jenkins also responded to Council questions, saying that jurisdiction applied mainly to inspection and maintenance of the Mobilehome Park. City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9695 • Public participation opened at 7:37 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Marie Horowitz - president of the Marineland Mobilehome Park Homeowners Association, requested that Council enact a rent -freeze urgency ordinance tonight; said local control would be better than state control; Catherine Kenny - Space #28, said market value is different for mobilehomes; submitted an Irvine World News article on how the Irvine City Council helped a non-profit agency purchase a mobilehome park at the request of residents; Steve Anderson - attorney representing Marineland Mobilehome Park property owners, spoke to his letter; Susan Moss - co-owner of the Mobilehome Park site, responded to Council questions; said that her stay in the Mobilehome Park was intended to be of a short-term duration; Sharon St. Clair - 25550 Hawthorne Blvd., Torrance, management company, for the Mobilehome Park, responded to Council questions pertaining to state -required setbacks and current number of occupied versus vacant spaces; said 15 spaces had been acquired by the park owners since 1986; said the spaces currently rent from $395 to $795 per month and that the recent increase brought the rents closer together in price; said they were offering five-year leases; Sandra Garcia - Space #9, questioned why the rents needed to be brought closer together since some of the older residents could not afford higher rent; said signing a long-term lease would negate. participation in rent stabilization; Scott Kenny - Space # 28, said the rent increases have exceeded the CPI; Darlene Sinatra - Space #52, expressed concern about the rent increases; cited problems with gas leaks; Mary Hudson - Space #56, presented a copy of her letter submitted April 7, 1998; and Ramona Stewart - Space #43, discussed the rent increases that have occurred since she moved in eight years ago. Public participation closed at 8:25 P.M. Action: To: 1. direct staff to begin the process of taking over jurisdiction from the state; 2 direct staff to obtain the correct figures over the past five years for rent increases including fees, utility cost additions and all other added charges; City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9696 3. direct staff to bring back more information with regard to the lot sizes, new coach sizes and setback requirements; 4. direct staff to return with more information on the mobilehome resident ownership program; and, 5. appoint Councilmembers Reviczky and Bowler as a subcommittee to meet with the mobilehome park residents and owners. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz and Mayor Edgerton. The meeting recessed at the hour of 8:35 P.M. The meeting reconvened at the hour of 8:58 P.M. 5. 6th STREET TRAFFIC STUDY - PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TO ARDMORE AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 6, 1998. Public participation opened at 9:00 P.M. As no one came forward to address the Council on this item, public participation closed at 9:00 P.M. Action: Acting Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council, that this item be continued to the meeting of Thursday, May 28, 1998, in order to have a quorum present, as Councilmember Reviczky had declared a potential conflict of interest due to living within the area. (Benz and Mayor Edgerton absent) 6. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT FOR PREFERENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM AND LETTERS FROM RESIDENTS REQUESTING CHANGES IN THE PREFERENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 7, 1998. Supplemental petition from South Bay Adult School Parent Education Program students and staff urging reconsideration of parking enforcement changes. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 9:05 P.M. Coming forward to address the council on this item were: Winston Marshall - 360 - 33rd Place, suggested that the changes be imposed only in the impacted area and that the remaining areas be left alone at this time; said the beach parking problems were different from the nighttime problems and should be handled separately; Janet Buckley - 125 25th Street, opposed the changes as a resident and as a South Bay Adult School teacher; said the changes would impact the school, that parents have difficulty with street parking in the mornings between May 15 and June 15, noting that the school's on-site City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9697 • parking area accommodates afternoon parking needs; said one-hour parking is useless and suggested that the areas further away from the downtown be reassessed; Merna Marshall - 360 33rd Place, suggested attaching a letter to the Coastal Commission form stating that the city reserves the right to change less than what was approved; said parts of the preferential parking area do not have parking problems; said her area did not have a daytime weekday parking problem and suggested no daytime enforcement there Tuesday through Friday; Lisa Ryder - 1940 Monterey Blvd., said the parking problems lessen at 19th Street and opposed allowing areas to opt in or out as traffic would then go the extra half block to park in her neighborhood; thought 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. year-round enforcement was too restrictive; said the only real problems occur nights and weekends and suggested addressing only those hours; suggested offering residents more than one guest pass; Celeste Coar - Loma Drive, suggested that any changes to the hours be temporary since she was not convinced that was the solution; suggested a study of other cities, noting that Beverly Hills offers resident -only parking; suggested that the City work with businesses to allow nighttime parking in the private lots of those businesses that open only during the day, like the post office and other office buildings; Leslie Murdock - Hermosa View Drive, said St. Cross Church is not affected by evening restaurant and bar users but is affected by beachgoers on weekends; said when the church's three parking lots fill up during services, member parking spills over into the street; said extending the parking restrictions year-round would create a great impact on the church membership; Barbara Force - 1950 Monterey Blvd., expressed concern about imposing year-round restrictions from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. and about the current limits on guest parking permits; said allowing some areas to opt out would simply move the congestion to another area; suggested expanding guest parking for the residents; and Paul Lawson - Pastor, St. Cross Church, 1818 Monterey Blvd., noted that nearby residents use the church parking lots during the week when they are not needed for church services; said he would like the church to be involved with finding a solution to the parking problems. Public participation closed at 9:25 P.M. City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9698 • Action: To: 1) receive the Notice of Intent to Issue an Amendment to Permit and direct City Manager to execute and return to Coastal Commission, as recommended by staff; 2) direct staff to enforce the amended hours (10 a.m. to 10 p.m.) in the preferential parking area from Sixth to 16th streets on a six-month trial basis; and 3) appoint Councilmember Reviczky and Acting Mayor Oakes as a subcommittee to hold neighborhood meetings and work with residents in the other areas to see how they are affected. Motion Reviczky, second Acting Mayor Oakes. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz and Mayor Edgerton. 7. REVISED PROPOSAL FOR A BEACH CONCERT ON SEPTEMBER 19, 1998. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 6, 1998. Supplemental letter from Tom Binnion received May 12, 1998. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Community Resources Director Rooney and Police Chief Straser also responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 9:35 P.M. Coming forward to address the council on this item were: Tom Binnion - 244 - 31st Street, representing radio station Star 98.7FM, spoke to his letter proposing that the City receive 100 percent of the net proceeds up to the first $10,000 and 50 percent of any profits above that amount rather than the guaranteed $25,000 minimum previously approved by Council, which he said was unrealistic; said Hootie and the Blowfish were interested in doing the concert; and Robert Lyles - marketing director of Star 98.7, said the concert they did here three years ago was the first one they had done; said because that concert was a good experience for everyone and Hermosa Beach was an ideal community for their listeners, the station wanted to do another concert on the beach. Public participation closed at 9:40 P.M. Action: To receive and file the revised proposal. Motion Reviczky, second Acting Mayor Oakes. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Bowler and the absence of Benz and Mayor Edgerton 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. VEHICLE LICENSE FEES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 5, 1998. City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9699 1 • • City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to take a position of opposing the repeal of the Vehicle License Fee program. Motion Bowler, second Reviczky. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz and Mayor Edgerton. b. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) LICENSE AGREEMENT - PATRICK MALLOY'S RESTAURANT. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 6, 1998. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file letter from the ABC District Office without taking any action; and to direct staff to return with outdoor dining guidelines for Council review. Motion Bowler, second Acting Mayor Oakes. The motion carried, noting the absence of Benz and Mayor Edgerton. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL - None 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: a) Request from Councilmember Benz to consider holding a recognition dinner for the top 20 sales tax producers in Hermosa Beach. Action: Acting Mayor Oakes directed, with the consensus of the Council, to continue this item to the next meeting due to the absence of Councilmember Benz. CITIZEN COMMENTS No one came forward to address the Council at this time. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Stern v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YCO28739 City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9700 • • ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, May 12, 1998, at the hour of 10:40 P.M. to a closed session. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION - The Closed Session convened at the hour of 11:02 P.M. At the hour of 11:20 P.M. the Closed Session adjourned to the Regular Meeting. ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS - There were no decisions made requiring a public announcement. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, May 12, 1998, at the hour of 11:21 P.M., to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, May 26, 1998 at the hour of 7:10 P.M. (Pursuant to Council policy, because the preceeding Monday [May 25] is a holiday, said Regular Meeting will adjourn to an Adjourned Reguluar Meeting to be held on Thursday, May 28, 1998, at the hour of 7:10 P.M.) —0 City C1 k City Council Minutes 05-12-98 Page 9701 VOUCHRE2 05/07/98 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME VENDOR VENDOR • 13660 05/07/98 003209 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR 13661 05/07/98 007742 DALE G. ANDERSON 13662 05/07/98 002021 FRANK 0. ARBOGAST 13663 05/07/98 008706 CHRISTOPHER ASHBY 13664 05/07/98 003423 AT & T 13665 05/07/98 005179 AT&T 13666 05/07/98 008681 BEACH TERRANCE INN 13667 05/07/98 008439 JIM BORER 13668 05/07/98 004592 LEONARD W. BROCK 13669 05/07/98 007109 ADAM BURT 13670 05/07/98 008585 AARON BUSH 13671 05/07/98 005469 FAYE CALLEN 13672 05/07/98 007611 CARMEN'S UNIFORM 13673 05/07/98 004257 WARREN CARTER 13674 05/07/98 000014 CHAMPION CHEVROLET 13675 05/07/98 008715 COMMUNITECH, INC 13676 05/07/98 002173 NANCY COOK 13677 05/07/98 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 13678 05/07/98 008711 D.E. COVINGTON 13679 05/07/98 000850 L. N. CURTIS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CELL CELL CELL CELL CELL CELL CELL CELL CELL CELL PHONE PHONE PHONE PHONE PHONE PHONE PHONE PHONE PHONE PHONE BILLING/MARCH 98 BILLING/MARCH 98 BILLING/MARCH 98 BILLING/MARCH 98 BILLING/MARCH 98 BILLING/APRIL 98 BILLING/APRIL 98 BILLING/MARCH 98 BILLING/MARCH 98 BILLING/MARCH 98 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE CITATION REFUND CELL PHONE LONG DISTANCE/APRIL LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/MARCH 98 LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/APRIL 98 LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/APRIL 98 LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/FEB 98 LODGING/HIGGINS PALM TREE INSPECTION PROFESSIONAL SERV.11/97-2/98 INSTRUCTOR'S PAYMENT/SPRING 98 REIMBURSEMENT FOR CARPET 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE UNIFORM PURCHASE/PARKING 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE AUTO REPAIRS/APRIL 98 HEADSET FOR DISPATCHER MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT/POST EXPRESSWRITER PURCHASE ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4304 001-2201-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4304 001-2201-4304 105-3105 105-3105 110-3302 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4202-4304 110-1204-4304 001-2101-4312 305-8160-4201 001-1101-4201 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4309 105-3105 110-3302-4187 105-3105 715-2101-4311 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4312 153-2106-5401 WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 001-2110 RESCUE EQUIPMENT PURCHASE 180-2202-5402 PAGE 1 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 438.97 129.18 30.00 218.43 79.00 258.22 78.81 440.27 189.23 30.00 1,892.11, 24.61 24.61 24.61 24.61 330.00 330.00 3.79 3.79 5.80 6.34 6.32 6.32 24.78 511.50 511.50 300.00 300.00 3,791.45 3,791.45 352.80 352.80 119.07 119.07 24.61 24.61 215.20 215.20 24.61 24.61 366.60 366.60 165.30 165.30 156.00 156.00 642.73 642.73 1,600.00 1,600.00 1,165.77 1,165.77 VOUCHRE2 05/07/98 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • 13680 05/07/98 008710 CYNITHIA DAHL 13681 05/07/98 001390 DAPPER TIRE CO. 13682 05/07/98 008520 SUE DE LA CAMP 13683 05/07/98 008242 LYNDA DESLANDES 13684 05/07/98 000147 THE DEVELOPMENT 13685 05/07/98 008713 RAY DUNCAN CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CLASS REFUND/SPRING 98 TIRE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 TIRE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 TIRES/FIRE ENGINE CLASS REFUND/SPRING 98 INSTRUCTORS PAYMENT/SPRING 98 FILM DEVELOPING/APRIL 98 FILM DEVELOPING/APRIL 98 FILM DEVELOPING/APRIL 98 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE 13686 05/07/98 000165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO P AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED 2 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2111 715-4202-4311 715-4202-4311 715-2201-4311 001-2111 001-4601-4221 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4305 160-3102-4309 105-3105 715-3104-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2101-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2101-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2601-4311 001-2021 001-2022 160-3102-4309 001-2021 001-2022 715-3104-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4206-4309 001-2021 001-2022 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2101-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2101-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4206-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4202-4311 001-2021 ITEM AMOUNT 18.00 114.25 114.25 883.76 58.00 387.10 45.42 28.99 35.94 24.61 83.95 1.71 1.71- 165.20 3.37 3.37- 159.89 3.26 3.26- 2.11 .04 .04- 19.91 .41 .41- 11.39 .23 .23- 82.50 1.68 1.68- 53.95 1.10 1.10- 159.89 3.26 3.26- 96.24 1.96 1.96- 7.29 .15 .15- 18.72 .38 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 18.00 1,112.26 58.00 387.10 110.35 24.61 VOUCHRE2 05/07/98 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 13687 05/07/98 008669 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODU TRAUMA SHOOTING KITS 13688 05/07/98 005509 RICK ESCALANTE INSTRUCTOR'S PAYMENT/SPRING 98 13689 05/07/98 006048 FAST EDDIE PUBLISHING C CA DRUNK DRIVING LAW UPDATE 13690 05/07/98 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 13691 05/07/98 003169 STEVE FILLMAN 13692 05/07/98 008266 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES EXPRESS MAIL/APRIL 98 SPRING 1998 CBVA TOURNAMENT WORKER'S COMP CLAIMS/APR 15-30 WORKER'S COMP ADMIN/MAY 98 13693 05/07/98 001748 GEORGE & AL'S AUTO TOP REUPHOLSTER SEATS ERT VAN 13694 05/07/98 003084 GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE 13695 05/07/98 007715 JOHN D. GOLLNER 13696 05/07/98 008071 TUITION/POST CLASS 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE GORDON H. CHONG & ASSSO PARKING STRUCTURE CONTRACT 13697 05/07/98 008707 MICHELLE GORDON 13698 05/07/98 007953 GEN A GREANEY CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING INSTRUCTOR'S PAYMENT/SPRING 98 13699 05/07/98 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR 98 TELEPHONE BILLING/3/25-4/25 TELEPHONE BILLING/MAR 98 13700 05/07/98 008712 VELMA J. HAZEL 13701 05/07/98 008673 ROBERT HIGGINS 13702 05/07/98 007259 JEFF HOUSTON 13703 05/07/98 000679 IAPMO 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE MEALS/POST CLASS INSTRUCTOR'S PAYMENT/SPRING 98 1998 MEMBERSHIP DUES 3 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2022 715-2101-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-3104-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-2601-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-4601-4311 001-2021 001-2022 153-2106-5401 001-4601-4221 001-1132-4305 001-1203-4305 001-4601-4221 705-1217-4324 705-1217-4201 715-2101-4311 001-2101-4312 105-3105 121-8624-4201 110-3302 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4304 110-1204-4304 001-2201-4304 105-3105 001-2101-4312 001-4601-4221 001-4201-4315 PAGE 3 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT .38- 11.61 .24 .24- 24.44 .50 .50- 114.92 2.35 2.35- 10.12 .21 .21- 1,022.13 527.72 527.72 226.80 226.80 129.67 129.67 7.75 7.75 1,596.00 1,596.00 33,669.22 2,333.33 36,002.55 324.75 324.75 41.00 41.00 24.61 24.61 16,014.50 16,014.50 330.00 330.00 112.00 112.00 67.56 32.46 162.43 262.45 24.61 24.61 140.00 140.00 535.50 535.50 150.00 150.00 VOUCHRE2 05/07/98 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME 13704 05/07/98 000157 ICMA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PUBLICATIONS 13705 05/07/98 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 13706 05/07/98 004326 INTERNATIONAL NETWORKIN RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 13707 05/07/98 008569 LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC SHUTTLE/ST. PATRICKS DAY 13708 05/07/98 007136 THE LAKES AT EL SEGUNDO INSTRUCTOR'S PAYMENT/SPRING 98 13709 05/07/98 007079 EDNA LEHMAN 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE 13710 05/07/98 002769 LOS ANGELES CO. ASSESSO ASSESSOR'S INFORMATION FILE 13711 05/07/98 007148 LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR 3RD QUARTER DISPUTE RESOLUTION 13712 05/07/98 000605 MANHATTAN FORD 13713 05/07/98 005846 -EVELYN MEDINA 13714 05/07/98 003080 MERRIMAC ENERGY GROUP 13715 05/07/98 008708 ROSEMARY MILANES 13716 05/07/98 008714 JESSIE MOORE 13717 05/07/98 008705 CONOR O'MAHONEY 13718 05/07/98 002514 OFFICE DEPOT 13719 05/07/98 006334 HAROLD ORMONDROYD AUTO PART PURCHASE/MARCH 98 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 AUTO PART PURCHASE/APRIL 98 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE 55 GAL TRANSMISSION FLUID CLASS REFUND/SPRING 98 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE REFUND TOWING FEES REFUND TOWING FEES DRAFTING CHAIR PURCHASE 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE 13720 05/07/98 002487 PAGING NETWORK OF ORANG PAGER SERVICE/APRIL 98 PAGER SERVICE/APRIL 98 PAGER SERVICE/APRIL 98 PAGER SERVICE/APRIL 98 PAGER SERVICE/APRIL 98 PAGER SERVICE/APRIL 98 13721 05/07/98 008702 PATHMASTERS INTERNATION REGISTRATION/CAVES 13722 05/07/98 008703 PRECISION ORDANCE PRODU AMMUNITION PURCHASE 13723 05/07/98 008718 LAURIE RICE CLASS REFUND/SPRING 98 CLASS REFUND/SPRING 98 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1141-4317 105-2601-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-2111 145-3409-4201 001-4601-4221 105-3105 001-1206-4201 001-1132-4201 715-4206-4309 715-3302-4311 715-3302-4311 715-3104-4311 105-3105 715-4206-4310 001-2111 105-3105 110-3302-4201 001-3841 001-2101-5401 105-3105 001-4202-4201 001-4601-4201 001-1206-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4201 001-1202-4201 001-1202-4317 153-2106-5402 001-2111 001-2111 ITEM AMOUNT 120.45 179.92 3.67 3.67 - PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 120.45 179.92 500.00 500.00 923.96 923.96 364.00 364.00 24.61 24.61 503.28 503.28 1,450.00 1,450.00 146.25 66.25 131.52 114.51 458.53 24.61 24.61 249.53 249.53 60.00 60.00 24.61 24.61 95.50 39.00 134.50 182.67 182.67 24.61 24.61 45.00 11.25 2.25 2.25 43.11 2.25 106.11 145.00 145.00 1,512.66 1,512.66 10.00 42.00 52.00 VOUCHRE2 05/07/98 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 13724 05/07/98 005379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS LEGAL BILING/MARCH 98 LEGAL BILLING/MARCH 98 LEGAL BILLING/MARCH 98 LEGAL BILLING/MARCH 98 13725 05/07/98 000949 DAVID RICKEY 13726 05/07/98 008704 RX LASER, INC MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT/POST LASER CHECK FORMS 13727 05/07/98 007922 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPM MP5 PURCHASE 13728 05/07/98 007727 JUAN J. SAVEDRA 13729 05/07/98 007170 WILMA D. SCHMIDLIN 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE 13730 05/07/98 007509 SECURED STORAGE-U.S.BAN 2ND QUARTER MICROFICHE STORAGE 13731 05/07/98 008709 ALEXANDRA NUTTALL- SMIT CLASS REFUND/SPRING 98 13732 05/07/98 003377 G. SCOTT SMITH 13733 05/07/98 007612 JILL SMITH INSTRUCTOR'S PAYMENT/SPRING 98 MEALS/POST CLASS 13734 05/07/98 008126 SOUTH BAY EMERG MEDICAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE 13735 05/07/98 005195 STANDARD CONCRETE PRODU CONCRETE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN CONCRETE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 13736 05/07/98 000123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN HARDWARE PURCHASE/APRIL 98 5 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-2101-4312 001-1202-4305 153-2106-5401 105-3105 105-3105 001-1121-4201 001-2111 001-4601-4221 001-2101-4312 001-2101-4201 001-3104-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-3104-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-3104-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-3104-4309 001-2021 001-2022 105-2601-4309 001-2021 001-2022 160-3102-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-3104-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-4202-4309 001-2021 001-2022 001-3104-4309 ITEM AMOUNT 58.00 819.00 79.35 37.50 234.00 101.60 679.81 24.61 24.61 24.00 105.00 336.00 40.00 403.00 278.14 2.50 2.50- 229.67 1.50 1.50- 53.49 5.94 5.94- 69.43 7.72 7.72- 57.46 6.39 6.39- 108.97 12.11 12.11- 44.20 4.91 4.91- 73.81 8.20 8.20- 79.28 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 993.85 234.00 101.60 679.81, 24.61 24.61 24.00 105.00 336.00 40.00 403.00 507.81 VOUCHRE2 05/07/98 17:58 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 13737 05/07/98 008670 UGLY & CHEAP PRODUCTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DISCOUNT DISCOUNT HARDWARE DISCOUNT DISCOUNT HARDWARE DISCOUNT DISCOUNT HARDWARE DISCOUNT DISCOUNT HARDWARE DISCOUNT DISCOUNT HARDWARE DISCOUNT DISCOUNT HARDWARE DISCOUNT DISCOUNT HARDWARE DISCOUNT DISCOUNT OFFERED TAKEN PURCHASE/APRIL OFFERED TAKEN PURCHASE/APRIL OFFERED TAKEN PURCHASE/APRIL OFFERED TAKEN PURCHASE/APRIL OFFERED TAKEN PURCHASE/APRIL OFFERED TAKEN PURCHASE/APRIL OFFERED TAKEN PURCHASE/APRIL OFFERED TAKEN ROLLED PLAN FILES ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2021 001-2022 98 110-3302-4305 001-2021 001-2022 98 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 98 105-2601-4304 001-2021 001-2022 98 110-3302-4305 001-2021 001-2022 98 110-3302-4309 001-2021 001-2022 98 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 98 001-4204-4309 001-2021 001-2022 13738 05/07/98 007864 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNI SAFEKEEPING FEES/MARCH 98 13739 05/07/98 004768 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE HP LASERJET PRINTER PURCHASE 13740 05/07/98 001938 V & V MANUFACTURING 13741 05/07/98 008716 VALCOM 13742 05/07/98 008356 VIP KAWASAKI 13743 05/07/98 003353 VISA 13744 05/07/98 007152 JOEL WEINSTEIN 13745 05/07/98 007785 WEST COVINA SERVICES 13746 05/07/98 005758 WILSON & ASSOCIATES 13747 05/07/98 000135 XEROX CORPORATION POLICE BADGES MICROSOFT OFFICE PRO 97 MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS/APRIL 98 AIR FARE/FIRE TRAINING MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT/POST GR INSTALLATION OF NEW SERVER DELL POWER SERVER PURCHASE 001-4201-4305 001-1141-4201 001-1206-5401 001-2101-4187 170-2103-5402 715-2101-4311 001-2115 001-2101-4312 170-2103-5402 170-2103-5402 POLYGRAPH EXAMINATIONS/POLICE 001-1201-4201 AFTER HOURS SERVICE CALL TOTAL CHECKS 001-1208-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 8.81 8.81- 12.20 1.36 1.36- 38.92 4.33 4.33- 189.53 21.06 21.06- 16.14 1.79 1.79- 48.72 5.41 5.41- 233.70 25.97 25.97- 233.70 25.97 25.97- 110.00 208.33 974.25 274.69 4,749.08 477.34 924.00 41.60 500.00 3,989.01 125.00 290.00 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 1,259.55 110.00 208.33 974.25 274.69 4,749.08 477.34 924.00 41.60 4,489.01 125.00 290.00 95,356.09 • VOUCHRE2 05/07/98 17:58 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 22,358.87 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 746.84 110 PARKING FUND 1,086.54 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 16,014.50 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 923.96 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 3,362.92 160 SEWER FUND 164.82 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 9,238.09 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 1,165.77 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 300.00 705 INSURANCE FUND 36,002.55 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,991.23 TOTAL 95,356.09 PAGE 7 VOUCHRE2 05/14/98 17:33 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 13748 05/14/98 13749 05/14/98 13750 05/14/98 13751 05/14/98 13752 05/14/98 13753 05/14/98 • • VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000138 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 000003 ADVANCE ELEVATOR 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 005221 ALL POINTS MAINTENANCE 006421 ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT 001984 AMERICAN PUB. WORKS ASS 13754 05/14/98 000152 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE 13755 05/14/98 005179 AT&T 13756 05/14/98 000407 AVIATION LOCK & KEY 13757 05/14/98 006409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS 13758 05/14/98 006322 PETE BONANO 13759 05/14/98 000163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION RADAR EQUIP REPAIRED ELEVATOR MAINT/MAY 98 TWO WAY RADIO MAINT/MAY 98 PIER MAINT/APRIL 98 RESCUE STRETCHER PURCHASE WHEEL CHOCKS/FIRE TRUCK 1998 PUBLIC WORKS POSTERS SHOP TOWELS/APRIL 98 MATS CLEANED/APRIL 98 SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/APRIL 98 SHOP TOWEL SERVICE/APRIL 98 MATS CLEANED/APRIL 98 LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE CHARGES/MAR 98 CHRGS/APRIL 98 FAX/3/23-4/15/98 FAX/3/23-4/15/98 FAX/3/23-4/15/98 FAX/3/23-4/15/98 CHRGS/APRIL 98 CHRGS/APRIL 98 • CHRGS/APRIL 98 CHRS/APRIL 98 CHRGS/APRIL 98 LOCKER ROOM REPAIRS/APRIL 98 KEYS MADE/APRIL 98 KEYS MADE/APRIL 98 KEYS MADE/APRIL 98 KEYS MADE FOR SUMMER EMPLOYEES ASPHALT PURCHASE/APRIL 98 EMULSION PURCHASE/APRIL 98 ASPHALT PURCHASE/APRIL 98 REIMBURSE FOR RENTAL CAR PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 98 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 98 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 98 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 98 PRISONER LAUNDRY/APRIL 98 13760 05/14/98 000155 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTR TRASH PICK-UP/MAY 98 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4201 110-3302-4201 001-3104-4201 180-2202-5402 001-2201-4309 001-4202-4305 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-2201-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1101-4304 001-1141-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4204-4321 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 715-4202-4311 001-2201-4309 001-2101-4309 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2115 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 001-2101-4306 ITEM AMOUNT 275.58 100.00 352.50 825.00 383.93 75.86 304.50 10.50 48.51 11.40 10.50 48.51 39.12 5.80 7.26 2.92 2.26 1.78 5.82 5.86 5.80 5.80 11.68 55.00 9.74 5.41 25.98 17.59 94.87 81.19 65.17 591.62 25.45 25.45 34.04 43.05 34.97 109-3301-4201 383.01 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 275.58 100.00 352.50 825.00 459.79, 304.50 129.42 94.10 113.72 241.23 591.62 162.96 383.01 4 VOUCHRE2 05/14/98 17:33 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 13761 05/14/98 003772 BUTLER BOXES & STAKES 13762 05/14/98 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT 13763 05/14/98 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC 13764 05/14/98 000153 CINTAS CORPORATION 13765 05/14/98 004534 CMP SUPPLY COMPANY 13766 05/14/98 000354 COAST IRRIGATION CO. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TREE STAKES & TIES STREET SWEEPING/APRIL 98 WATER BILLING/MARCH 98 WATER BILLING/MARCH 98 WATER BILLING/MARCH 98 UNIFORM SERVICE/APRIL 98 UNIFORM SERVICE/APRIL 98 UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 98 UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 98 UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 98 UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 98 UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 98 UNIFORM RENTAL/APRIL 98 REMANUFACTURED CARTRIDGES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/MAY 98 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/MAY 98 13767 05/14/98 003674 COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL S TESTING MATERIALS 13768 05/14/98 004981 CREATIVE JUICES TYPESETTING SUMMER BROCHURE 13769 05/14/98 000047 DANIEL FREEMAN MEMORIAL PHYSCIAL EXAM/CHESSON 13770 05/14/98 007284 MIKE DISBOLIS 13771 05/14/98 001400 EFRAM MOBIL 1997 ASSESSMENT REBATE GAS PURCHASE/FEB 5 -MARCH 3 98 13772 05/14/98 001397 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT UNEMP CLAIMS/JAN 98 -MAR -98 13773 05/14/98 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 98 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 98 JANITORIAL SERV/APRIL 98 JANITORIAL SERV/APRIL 98 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 98 JANITORIAL SERVICES/APRIL 98 JANITORIAL SERVICE/APRIL 98 13774 05/14/98 008357 FIRST -IN FIRE EQUIPMENT FIRE HELMETS 13775 05/14/98 008175 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES 13776 05/14/98 008722 FUME A PEST 13777 05/14/98 008717 GFOA LIABILITY TRUST ACCOUNT • ACCOUNT NUMBER 105-2601-4309 001-3104-4201 105-2601-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-2101-4305 001-4202-4309 001-4202-4309 001-1203-4201 001-4601-4302 001-1203-4320 105-3105 715-2101-4310 705-1215-4186 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-4204-4201 001-2201-4187 705-1209-4324 PEST CONTROL/APRIL,MAY & JUNE 001-4204-4309 PUBLICATION 001-1202-4317 13778 05/14/98 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO TELEPHONE BILLING/APRIL 98 001-2101-4304 9 ITEM AMOUNT 765.03 9,600.00 625.48 2,436.56 730.84 89.06 5.00 89.06 5.00 91.76 5.00 89.06 5.00 249.76 272.60 282.50 507.50 1,271.94 400.00 24.61 12.32 1,869.00 1,200.00 625.00 950.00 290.00 290.00 1,700.00 325.00 63.87 25,072.47 450.00 15.00 72.43 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 765.03 9,600.00 3,792.88 378.94 249.76 555.10 507.50 1,271.94 400.00 24.61 12.32 1,869.00 5,380.00 63.87 25,072.47 450.00 15.00 VOUCHRE2 05/14/98 17:33 VOUCHER/ CHECK. CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE BILLING/MAY 98 BILLING/APRIL 98 BILLING/MAY 98 BILLING/APRIL 98 BILLING/APRIL 98 BILLING/APRIL 98 BILLING/APRIL 98 BILLING/APRIL 98 BILLING/APRIL 98 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4202-4304 001-2101-4304 001-4601-4304 13779 05/14/98 006518 HAYER CONSULTANTS, INC. TEMP BUILDING INSPECT/1/16-30 001-4201-4201 13780 05/14/98 002458 INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELE 13781 05/14/98 008723 KEY ENGINEERING 13782 05/14/98 006293 KINKO'S INC. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/APRIL 98 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/MAR 98 FIRE DEPARTMENT PLAN CHECK LAMINATING SERVICES/APRIL 98 13783 05/14/98 008720 LA CO INFORMATION RESOD ASSESSMENT APPEALS REPORT 13784 05/14/98 004303 LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 13785 05/14/98 007958 LASER FICHE 13786 05/14/98 000167 LEARNED LUMBER 13787 05/14/98 007114 LEASE GROUP RESOURCES LANDSCAPE MAINT/APRIL 98 4 HOURS ON-SITE TRAINING SAFETY GLASS WINDOW PURCHASE PLYWOOD PURCHASE COPIER LEASE/MAY 98 13788 05/14/98 004871 MANCHESTER LOCK AND SUP JAIL LOCK REPAIR 13789 05/14/98 005664 MC DOWELL-CRAIG 13790 05/14/98 004138 KENNETH A. MEERSAND 13791 05/14/98 007827 MUTUAL PROPANE 13792 05/14/98 008719 NORCO INDUSTRIES,INC 13793 05/14/98 000321 PACIFIC BELL 13794 05/14/98 003820 POSTMASTER 13795 05/14/98 008482 PRO MEDIX OFFICE FUNITURE/POLICE DEPT LEGAL SERVICES/APRIL 98 PROPANE/GO-4'S AIR FLOOR JACK WHITE PAGE LISTING/MAY 98 SUMMER BROCHURE & PERMIT # 52 MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 13796 05/14/98 005379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS LEGAL FEES/MARCH 98 Lb 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 105-2601-4309 001-2115 001-4202-4305 001-1202-4201 001-4202-4201 001-1121-4317 001-4204-4309 001-3104-4309 001-1208-6900 001-2101-4309 153-2106-5401 001-1132-4201 715-3302-4310 180-2202-5401 001-2101-4304 001-4601-4305 001-2201-4309 001-2201-4309 001-2201-4309 001-1131-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 46.64 93.38 87.42 29.12 29.26 415.05 63.42 88.89 31.35 2,970.00 252.44 305.27 288.59 182.89 1,029.19 1,371.45 1,371.45 19.32 19.32 124.00 124.00 8,229.00 8,229.00 625.00 625.00 51.84 63.80 115.64 842.90 842.90 117.35 117.35 610.53 610.53 6,115.50 6,115.50 270.52 270.52 420.55 420.55 7.46 7.46 500.00 500.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 956.96 2,970.00 327.51 60.13 140.69 10,533.84 528.33 VOUCHRE2 05/14/98 17:33 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME • • 13797 05/14/98 008721 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. 13798 05/14/98 001578 ED RUZAK & ASSOC. 13799 05/14/98 007356 STEVEN SCHREINER 13800 05/14/98 003505 SHORELINE PRINTING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION LEGAL BILLING/MARCH 98 LEGAL FEES/MARCH 98 LEGAL FEES/APRIL 98 LEGAL FEES/MARCH 98 ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS TRAFFIC ENG SERV/APRIL 98 TONER CARTRIDGE PURCHASE BUSINESS CARDS PRINTED BUSINESS CARDS/RON SIMPSON SUBPOENA PAPER PURCHASE/APR 98 13801 05/14/98 000114 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMP SUPPLIES FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS PRISONER SUPPLIES.APRIL 98 SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT/APRIL 98 13802 05/14/98 007161 SMITH & HAWKEN 13803 05/14/98 000159 BENCH FOR VALLEY PARK SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI ELECTRIC BILLING/APRIL 98 ELECTRIC BILLING/APRIL 98 ELECTRIC BILLING/APRIL 98 ELECTRIC BILLING/APRIL 98 13804 05/14/98 000115 SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE C DOWNTOWN AREA MAINT/APRIL 98 13805 05/14/98 001207 SRECO FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS HOSE,ROD GUIDE & COUPLING RODS FOR THE RODDER 13806 05/14/98 007052 TSENG & ASSOCIATES AB 939 CONTRACT SERVICES 13807 05/14/98 008207 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALE DIGALERT/MAY 98 13808 05/14/98 001206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES COMBINATION DRILL/BREAKER TOTAL CHECKS iI ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1131-4201 105-2601-4201 001-1203-4201 001-1131-4201 105-2601-4309 001-3104-4201 001-1208-4305 001-4201-4305 001-4202-4305 001-2101-4305 001-1101-4305 001-2101-4306 001-2201-4309 001-4202-5402 105-2601-4303 105-2601-4303 160-3102-4303 105-2601-4303 109-3301-4201 160-3102-4309 160-3102-4309 117-5301-4201 160-3102-4201 001-3104-5402 ITEM AMOUNT 1,713.46 459.38 4,375.80 1,153.75 313.32 1,225.00 184.03 259.80 43.30 48.71 65.37 149.06 112.13 1,129.05 137.53 31.44 130.17 82.40 4,615.00 616.89 2,220.52 6,000.00 51.25 4,952.44 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 18,236.23 313.32 1,225.00 184.03, 351.81 326.56 1,129.05 381.54 4,615.00 2,837.41 6,000.00 51.25 4,952.44 119,899.19 VOUCHRE2 05/14/98 17:33 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 73,396.74 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 3,468.38 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 4,998.01 110 PARKING FUND 372.50 117 AB939 FUND 6,000.00 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 610.53 160 SEWER FUND 3,018.83 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 804.48 705 INSURANCE FUND 26,941.47 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 288.25 TOTAL 119,899.19 I Z. • PAGE 5 • • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 05/14/98 17:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE R.EMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED_O PAGES TO l INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FORT- A4/34' ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DIREEECTOR DATE 2I 0I! 0�j PAGE 6 • May 18 , 1998 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council May 28, 1998 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the checks listed below: #13799 - 05/14/98 - Steven Schreiner $184.03 Issued to wrong vendor in error. Check was never mailed Concur: Stephen R. e P, City Manager . Workman, City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director May 21, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 28, 1998 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Mildly; , f 111E IB /u < 1998 Award of bid for 2 sewer pumps/motors at 30 Street & Strand Public Works Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of June 16, 1998 Adoption of 1998-98 Budget Community Development Director Finance Director Review delinquent refuse bills for the purpose of ordering said delinquent charges be placed on the property tax bill as a special assessment. City Manager ,duly 4.;1�'g$:..:: ::' Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of May 20, 1998 Community Resources Director Public Hearing: Vacation of a portion of west side of Hermosa Avenue between Lyndon Street and the southerly border line Public Works Director Public Hearing: Landscaping and Street Lighting Assessment District Public Works Director UUT ordinance update Finance Director Pier Project Subcommittee Report City Manager City Hall Remodel Fire Chief Skatetrack Report Community Resources Director Solicitation ordinance modification Finance Director Request for stop control at Hermosa Ave/lOth Street Public Works Director /u < 1998 Award of bid for 2 sewer pumps/motors at 30 Street & Strand Public Works Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of June 16, 1998 Adoption of 1998-98 Budget Community Development Director Finance Director Review delinquent refuse bills for the purpose of ordering said delinquent charges be placed on the property tax bill as a special assessment. City Manager lc ,duly 4.;1�'g$:..:: ::' Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of June 17, 1998 Community Resources Director lc Honorable Mayor and Members of May 21, 1998 Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 1998 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS APRIL1998 Attached are the April 1998 Revenue and Expenditure Status Reports. General Fund revenue is 86% received for 83.3% of the fiscal year. Parking Fund revenue is 81.4% received. General Fund expenditures are 76.1 % expended and Parking Fund expenditures are 81.1% expended for 83.3% of the fiscal year. NO ED: Respectfully submitted, Stephen City Ma er ell, Viki Copeland Finance Director h:\b95\openVevexp. doc REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 3102 CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 3106 SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813 3107 TRANSFER TAX 3108 SALES TAX 3109 1/2 CENT SALES TX EXT 3110 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 3111 ELECTRIC FRANCHISE 3112 GAS FRANCHISE 3113 REFUSE FRANCHISE 3114 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 3115 BUSINESS LICENSE 3120 UTILITY USER TAX TAXES 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS 3202 DOG LICENSES 3203 BICYCLE LICENSES 3204 BUILDING PERMITS 3205 ELECTRIC PERMITS 3206 PLUMBING PERMITS 3207 OCCUPANCY PERMITS 3209 GARAGE SALES 3211 BANNER PERMITS 3212 ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 3213 ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 3214 AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 3215 TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT 3216 SPRAY BOOTH PERMIT 3217 OPEN FIRE PERMIT 3218 AUTO REPAIR PERMIT LICENSES AND PERMITS 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3402 RENTS & CONCESSIONS 3403 PIER REVENUE 3404 COMM CTR LEASES 3405 COMM CTR RENTALS 3406 COMM CTR THEATRE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED ESTIMATE APRIL REVENUE 1997-98 REVENUE PAGE 1 BALANCE % COL 2,979,534.00 958,908.13 2,649,234.04 330,299.96 216,664.00 .00 213,571.61 3,092.39 89,000.00 6,662.78- 138,433.24 49,433.24- 18,030.00 2,698.72 20,687.20 2,657.20- 100,862.00 9,399.99 98,819.43 2,042.57 1,841,602.00 124,700.00 1,516,825.80 324,776.20 136,293.00 9,687.14 83,111.29 53,181.71 155,000.00 .00 81,666.01 73,333.99 48,644.00 48,243.73 48,243.73 400.27 33,000.00 37,644.97 37,644.97 4,644.97- 165,000.00 .00 80,185.25 84,814.75 410,000.00 55,493.68 362,869.03 47,130.97 525,000.00 36,554.98 402,694.66 122,305.34 1,984,487.00 211,469.01 1,639,921.13 344,565.87 8,703,116.00 1,488,137.57 7,373,907.39 1,329,208.61 13,000.00 272.50 12,782.10 217.90 100.00 .00 76.60 23.40 340,341.00 89,930.36 319,725.03 20,615.97 25,000.00 3,627.00 29,766.70 4,766.70- 24,000.00 2,432.00 24,032.60 32.60- 7,550.00 945.00 7,797.60 247.60- 130.00 3.00 57.00 73.00 4,120.00 412.00 3,491.15 628.85 167.00 .00 223.10 56.10- 2,671.00 250.00 2,506.50 164.50 600.00 39.00 349.80 250.20 726.00 33.00 188.00 538.00 119.00 .00 119.00 .00 565.00 48.00 286.00 279.00 1,984.00 .00 2,176.00 192.00- 421,073.00 97,991.86 403,577.18 17,495.82 120,000.00 13,999.90 120,497.13 163,980.00 38,441.38 148,544.78 2,267.00 58.90 1,656.95 500.00 25.00 448.10 98,075.00 6,840.00 80,330.00 44,000.00 2,817.50 31,036.00 35,000.00 4,128.50 40,665.70 88.9 98.6 155.5 114.7 98.0 82.4 61.0 52.7, 99.2 114.1 48.6 88.5 76.7 82.6 84.7 98.3 76.6 93.9 119.1 100.1 103.3 43.8 84.7 133.6 93.8 58.3 25.9 100.0 50.6 109.7 95.8 497.13- 100.4 15,435.22 90.6 610.05 73.1 51.90 89.6 17,745.00 81.9 12,964.00 70.5 5,665.70- 116.2 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 2 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3411 OTHER FACILITIES 38,000.00 921.00 19,198.00 18,802.00 50.5 3412 TENNIS COURTS 11,000.00 674.25 7,545.75 3,454.25 68.6 3418 SPECIAL EVENTS 64,000.00 3,794.00 55,529.09 8,470.91 86.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 2,486.00 .00 1,426.57 1,059.43 57.4 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 459,308.00 57,700.53 386,380.94 72,927.06 84.1 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 300.00 .00 294.18 5.82 98.1 3505 IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 728,559.00 73,221.24 655,247.99 73,311.01 89.9 3507 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 9,800.00 2,638.32 4,653.81 5,146.19 47.5, 3508 MANDATED COSTS 12,859.00 .00 27,294.00 14,435.00- 212.3 3509 HOMEOWNR PROP TX RELIEF 60,459.00 .00 30,906.47 29,552.53 51.1 3510 POST 16,000.00 5,729.48 16,755.56 755.56- 104.7 3511 STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 3,410.00 .00 4,045.00 635.00- 118.6 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 831,387.00 81,589.04 739,197.01 92,189.99 88.9 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3801 RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 12,440.00 1,980.10 15,510.70 3,070.70- 124.7 3802 SIGN REVIEW 2,200.00 .00 2,129.70 70.30 96.8 3803 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1,974.00 .00 1,645.00 329.00 83.3 3805 CONDTL USE PERMIT AMEND 3,520.00 357.00 2,841.40 678.60 80.7 3806 BOARD OF APPEALS .00 .00 .00 .00 3808 ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW 5,090.00 1,031.00 5,129.50 39.50- 100.8 3809 TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00 3810 FINAL MAP REVIEW 1,485.00 502.00 2,761.00 1,276.00- 185.9 3811 ZONE CHANGE/GEN PLAN AMEND 2,676.00 .00 2,676.00 .00 100.0 3812 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 25,440.00 3,012.00 27,768.55 2,328.55- 109.2 3813 PLAN CHECK FEES 272,200.00 26,602.82 170,822.27 101,377.73 62.8 3814 PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL 360.00 .00 .00 360.00 0.0 3815 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 9,918.00 9,217.15 17,221.16 7,303.16- 173.6 3818 POLICE SERVICES 3,000.00 480.00 3,234.70 234.70- 107.8 3819 JAIL SERVICES 6,000.00 2,218.00 16,943.00 10,943.00- 282.4 3821 FINGERPRINT SERVICE 6,000.00 637.00 5,436.01 563.99 90.6 3823 SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 40,000.00 5,917.00 37,252.75 2,747.25 93.1 3824 VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES 10.00 15.00 60.00 50.00- 600.0 3825 PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 32.00 .00 .00 32.00 0.0 3827 LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 6,287.00 .00 6,287.00 .00 100.0 3831 STREET CUT INSPECTION 15,000.00 486.00 22,575.55 7,575.55- 150.5 3833 RECREATION SERVICE CHARGES 4,548.00 388.25 2,500.41 2,047.59 55.0 3834 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 22,000.00 9,248.80 51,726.25 29,726.25- 235.1 3837 RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 1,200.00 40.00 510.00 690.00 42.5 3838 SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIONS 150.00 656.50 772.50 622.50- 515.0 3839 PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 500.00 59.39 710.01 210.01- 142.0 3840 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 95,000.00 8,772.81 81,987.94 13,012.06 86.3 3841 POLICE TOWING 25,000.00 2,106.00 20,632.80 4,367.20 82.5 3857 PKG PLAN APPLICATION 4,104.00 .00 4,104.00 .00 100.0 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 3 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3858 TENANT REFUSE BILLING 210.00 .00 65.50 144.50 31.2 3859 REFUSE LIEN FEE 1,100.00 6,218.52 13,143.98 12,043.98- 999.9+ 3862 ALARM PERMIT FEE 2,000.00 66.00 1,848.00 152.00 92.4 3863 FALSE ALARM FEE 1,000.00 .00 110.10 889.90 11.0 3864 C.U.P./FENCES/WALLS 210.00 .00 .00 210.00 0.0 3866 NONCONFORMING REMODELS 7,380.00 2,241.00 7,460.75 80.75- 101.1 3867 PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS 31,925.00 5,108.00 38,293.75 6,368.75- 119.9 3868 PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT 27,867.00 1,902.00 26,253.00 1,614.00 94.2 3869 2ND PARTY RESPONSE 300.00 .00 .00 300.00 0.0 3878 COMML BLDG/APT INSPECT 583.00 .00 970.20 387.20- 166.4, 3881 ROLLR HOCKEY RINK RENT INS .00 717.00- 48.00 48.00- *** 3882 SPEC EVENT SECURITY/FIRE 3,000.00 .00 2,334.61 665.39 77.8 3883 FINAL/TENT MAP EXTNSION .00 .00 .00 .00 3884 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 567.00 .00 .00 567.00 0.0 3888 PLANNING COMM APPEALS 1,472.00 .00 1,104.00 368.00 75.0 3890 300'RADIUS NOTCG/APL CC 646.00 225.00 530.25 115.75 82.1 3893 CONTR RECREATION CLASSES 155,000.00 12,498.64 154,529.31 470.69 99.7 3894 OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS 45,000.00 4,612.50 26,620.00 18,380.00 59.2 3896 MAILING FEE 50.00 .00 50.20 .20- 100.4 3897 ADMIN FEE, INS CERTIF 159.00 1,360.00- 564.00- 723.00 354.7- 3899 C.U.P. MINOR AMEND. 305.00 .00 .00 305.00 0.0 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 844,908.00 104,521.48 776,035.85 68,872.15 91.8 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 17,000.00 .00 14,890.00 2,110.00 87.6 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 1,904.00 .00 1,072.78 831.22 56.3 3903 CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 11,378.00 1,189.01 18,302.57 6,924.57- 160.9 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 784.00 57.50 4,546.08 3,762.08- 579.9 3909 LATE FEE .00 .00 5.31 5.31- *** 3920 BCHD HEALTHY CITIES FUND 16,870.00 .00 16,869.83 .17 100.0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1,221,690.00 101,599.17 1,022,991.70 198,698.30 83.7 OTHER REVENUE 1,269,626.00 102,845.68 1,078,678.27 190,947.73 85.0 REVENUE CONTROL 12,649,418.00 1,946,786.06 10,878,273.77 1,771,144.23 86.0 GENERAL FUND 12,649,418.00 1,946,786.06 10,878,273.77 1,771,144.23 86.0 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 4 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3101 CURRENT YEAR SECURED 449,318.00 109,335.52 382,025.99 67,292.01 85.0 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 10,872.00 65.89- 23,326.04 12,454.04- 214.6 3105 ASSESSMENT REBATES 5,682.00- 319.93- 2,281.16- 3,400.84- 40.1 TAXES 454,508.00 108,949.70 403,070.87 51,437.13 88.7 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 50,563.00 7,067.14 30,609.66 19,953.34 60.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 522.00 .00 303.67 218.33 58.2, USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 51,085.00 7,067.14 30,913.33 20,171.67 60.5 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB-PREVIOUS YEARS REVENUE CONTROL LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND .00 .00 45.00- 45.00 *** 505,593.00 116,016.84 433,939.20 71,653.80 85.8 505,593.00 116,016.84 433,939.20 71,653.80 85.8 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 5 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 49,495.00 3,477.24 13,134.53 36,360.47 26.5 3413 PARKING LOT LEASE 278,728.00 24,821.39 199,773.45 78,954.55 71.7 3420 OTHER INTEREST INCOME 19,199.00 1,595.37 16,010.54 3,188.46 83.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 220.00 .00 118.50 101.50 53.9 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 347,642.00 29,894.00 229,037.02 118,604.98 65.9 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 60,744.00 .00 60,743.28 .72 100.0, REVENUE CONTROL 408,386.00 29,894.00 289,780.30 118,605.70 71.0 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 408,386.00 29,894.00 289,780.30 118,605.70 71.0 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 110 PARKING FUND * e CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3300 3302 FINES & FORFEITURES COURT FINES/PARKING PAGE 6 BALANCE % COL 927,650.00 80,685.00 755,634.10 172,015.90 81.5 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 13,711.00 1,142.83 4,138.46 9,572.54 30.2 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 25.00 .00 90.99 65.99- 364.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 13,736.00 1,142.83 4,229.45 9,506.55 30.8 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3842 PARKING METERS 720,347.00 56,555.96 579,553.74 140,793.26 80.5 3843 PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL 230,000.00 14,883.00 204,643.00 25,357.00 89.0 3844 DAILY PARKING PERMITS 700.00 48.00 611.75 88.25 87.4 3848 DRIVEWAY PERMITS 500.00 .00 352.80 147.20 70.6 3849 GUEST PERMITS 1,400.00 62.00 1,109.10 290.90 79.2 3850 CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS 2,000.00 660.00 2,861.30 861.30- 143.1 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 954,947.00 72,208.96 789,131.69 165,815.31 82.6 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN 30,780.00 .00 20,520.00 10,260.00 66.7 REVENUE CONTROL 1,927,113.00 154,036.79 1,569,515.24 357,597.76 81.4 PARKING FUND 1,927,113.00 154,036.79 1,569,515.24 357,597.76 81.4 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 7 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3,539.00 704.11 3,387.70 151.30 95.7 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 54.00 .00 32.32 21.68 59.9 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3,593.00 704.11 3,420.02 172.98 95.2 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 72,041.00 5,489.44 61,466.21 10,574.79 85.3 3502 SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 154,606.00 10,757.49 126,662.33 27,943.67 81.9 3503 SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION 4,000.00 .00 4,000.00 .00 100.0, 3512 SECTION 2105 (PROP 111) 110,341.00 8,052.32 93,165.07 17,175.93 84.4 3522 TDA ARTICLE 3/LOCAL 7,716.00 .00 .00 7,716.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 348,704.00 24,299.25 285,293.61 63,410.39 81.8 REVENUE CONTROL 352,297.00 25,003.36 288,713.63 63,583.37 82.0 STATE'GAS TAX FUND 352,297.00 25,003.36 288,713.63 63,583.37 82.0 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 117 AB939 FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 8 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 6,813.00 1,763.53 7,778.36 965.36- 114.2 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 137.00 .00 74.45 62.55 54.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 6,950.00 1,763.53 7,852.81 902.81- 113.0 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3860 AB939 SURCHARGE 61,621.00 .00 30,076.97 31,544.03 48.8 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS .00 .00 624.00 624.00- *** REVENUE CONTROL 68,571.00 1,763.53 38,553.78 30,017.22 56.2 AB939 FUND 68,571.00 1,763.53 38,553.78 30,017.22 56.2 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND • is CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 9 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 4,908.00 850.35 3,854.13 1,053.87 78.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 70.00 .00 39.63 30.37 56.6 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 4,978.00 850.35 3,893.76 1,084.24 78.2 REVENUE CONTROL 4,978.00 850.35 3,893.76 1,084.24 78.2 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 4,978.00 850.35 3,893.76 1,084.24 78.2 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION • 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3606 LA CO PRKS/PIER RENOVATION 3608 MAINTENANCE ALLOCATION 3610 CO. LIFEGUARD AGREEMENT 3611 PROP A DISCRETIONARY FUNDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY REVENUE CONTROL PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED ESTIMATE 1,000,000.00 17,164.00 500,000.00 .00 1,517,164.00 1,517,164.00 1,517,164.00 APRIL REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1997-98 REVENUE 20,703.03 .00 .00 .00 20,703.03 } PAGE 10 BALANCE % COL 979,296.97 17,164.00 500,000.00 .00 1,496,460.97 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.4 .00 20,703.03 1,496,460.97 1.4 .00 20,703.03 1,496,460.97 1.4 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 • • 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3100 TAXES 3116 PARK REC FACILITY TAX 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910 PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU REVENUE CONTROL PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 11 BALANCE % COL 49,000.00 .00 10,500.00 38,500.00 21.4 5,304.00 2,820.79 11,201.00 5,897.00- 211.2 201.00 .00 94.87 106.13 47.2 5,505.00 2,820.79 11,295.87 5,790.87- 205.2 207,920.00 36,074.00 111,618.00 96,302.00 53.7 262,425.00 38,894.79 133,413.87 129,011.13 50.8 262,425.00 38,894.79 133,413.87 129,011.13 50.8 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) i PAGE 12 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 102,356.00 16,425.35 74,982.92 27,373.08 73.3 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 1,358.00 .00 779.17 578.83 57.4 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 103,714.00 16,425.35 75,762.09 27,951.91 73.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR .00 .00 1.02 1.02- *** REVENUE CONTROL 103,714.00 16,425.35 75,763.11 27,950.89 73.1' 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 103,714.00 16,425.35 75,763.11 27,950.89 73.1 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 13 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 10,194.00 1,624.88 7,379.32 2,814.68 72.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 133.00 .00 77.04 55.96 57.9 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 10,327.00 1,624.88 7,456.36 2,870.64 72.2 REVENUE CONTROL 10,327.00 1,624.88 7,456.36 2,870.64 72.2 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 10,327.00 1,624.88 7,456.36 2,870.64 72.2 • REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 14 BALANCE % COL 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3720 AMER DISAB ACT 385,529.00 .00 12,634.00 372,895.00 3.3 REVENUE CONTROL 385,529.00 .00 12,634.00 372,895.00 3.3 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 385,529.00 .00 12,634.00 372,895.00 3.3 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 15 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3117 PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 210,720.00 17,848.00 157,788.00 52,932.00 74.9 3121 SUBREGIONAL INCENTIVES 27,025.00 .00 7,125.17 19,899.83 26.4 TAXES 237,745.00 17,848.00 164,913.17 72,831.83 69.4 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 5,354.00 1,384.40 5,909.15 555.15- 110.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 111.00 .00 57.50 53.50 51.8 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 5,465.00 1,384.40 5,966.65 501.65- 109.2' 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3854 FARES, DIAL A RIDE 11,500.00 .00 6,736.65 4,763.35 58.6 3855 BUS PASSES 1,200.00 97.60 1,032.80 167.20 86.1 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 12,700.00 97.60 7,769.45 4,930.55 61.2 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3916 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 10,000.00 .00 .00 10,000.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 265,910.00 19,330.00 178,649.27 87,260.73 67.2 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 265,910.00 19,330.00 178,649.27 87,260.73 67.2 • REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3118 PROP C LOCAL RETURN FDS PAGE 16 BALANCE % COL 175,714.00 17,027.00 130,552.00 45,162.00 74.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 20,530.00 6,056.46 25,200.91 4,670.91- 122.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 442.00 .00 232.15 209.85 52.5 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 20,972.00 6,056.46 25,433.06 4,461.06- 121.3 REVENUE CONTROL PROPOSITION 'C FUND 196,686.00 23,083.46 155,985.06 40,700.94 79.3' 196,686.00 23,083.46 155,985.06 40,700.94 79.3 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 150 GRANTS FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 17 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3545 COASTAL CONSERVANCY GRANT .00 .00 .00 .00 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3725 F.E.M.A. PIER REPAIR 90,000.00 .00 .00 90,000.00 0.0 3730 STPL LOWER PIER PROJ .00 .00 60,743.28 60,743.28- *** INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 90,000.00 .00 60,743.28 29,256.72 67.5 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3847 PARKING STRUCTURE EASEMENT 1,100,000.00 .00 .00 1,100,000.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 1,190,000.00 .00 60,743.28 1,129,256.72 5.1 GRANTS FUND 1,190,000.00 .00 60,743.28 1,129,256.72 5.1 • • REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 18 05/20/98 12:41:52 REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 151 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3517 SPEED ENF/EDUCATION PROG 2,589.00 .00 2,589.22 .22- 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 2,589.00 .00 2,589.22 .22- 100.0 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND 2,589.00 .00 2,589.22 .22- 100.0 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 152 AIR•QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 19 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 1,320.00 122.41 570.99 749.01 43.3 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 11.00 .00 7.34 3.66 66.7 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 1,331.00 122.41 578.33 752.67 43.5 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3538 AQMD EMISSION CTL AB276 20,500.00 .00 9,679.18 10,820.82 47.2 REVENUE CONTROL 21,831.00 122.41 10,257.51 11,573.49 47.0' AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 21,831.00 122.41 10,257.51 11,573.49 47.0 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 3135 TAXES C.O.P.S. ALLOCATION 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY REVENUE CONTROL SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) PAGE 20 BALANCE % COL 43,470.00 .00 43,469.83 .17 100.0 2,304.00 360.72 2,097.61 206.39 91.0 44.00 .00 15.52 28.48 35.3 2,348.00 360.72 2,113.13 234.87 90.0 45,818.00 360.72 45,582.96 235.04 99.5, 45,818.00 360.72 45,582.96 235.04 99.5 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 21 BALANCE % COL 3100 TAXES 3103 PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 4,059.00 .00 4,234.70 175.70- 104.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 34.00 46.58 163.34 129.34- 480.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 4.00 .00 .50 3.50 12.5 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 38.00 46.58 163.84 125.84- 431.2 REVENUE CONTROL 4,097.00 46.58 4,398.54 301.54- 107.4, CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 4,097.00 46.58 4,398.54 301.54- 107.4 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 160 SEWER FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 22 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 182,361.00 20,208.07 88,909.12 93,451.88 48.8 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 1,613.00 .00 919.30 693.70 57.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 183,974.00 20,208.07 89,828.42 94,145.58 48.8 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANCE 10,000.00 .00 6,375.62 3,624.38 63.8 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 SEWER CONNECTION FEE 35,556.00 1,929.37 41,198.54 5,642.54- 115.9 3829 SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 500.00 1,670.00 3,674.00 3,174.00- 734.8 3832 SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 2,100.00 668.00 2,993.80 893.80- 142.6 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 38,156.00 4,267.37 47,866.34 9,710.34- 125.4 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 800,000.00 66,666.67 666,666.70 133,333.30 83.3 REVENUE CONTROL 1,032,130.00 91,142.11 810,737.08 221,392.92 78.5 SEWER FUND 1,032,130.00 91,142.11 810,737.08 221,392.92 78.5 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3300 3304 FINES & FORFEITURES FORFEITED FUNDS PAGE 23 BALANCE % COL 7,000.00 .00 6,924.42 75.58 98.9 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 18,046.00 1,741.87 7,925.89 10,120.11 43.9 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 143.00 .00 83.31 59.69 58.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 18,189.00 1,741.87 8,009.20 10,179.80 44.0 REVENUE CONTROL ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 25,189.00 1,741.87 25,189.00 1,741.87 14,933.62 10,255.38 59.3, 14,933.62 10,255.38 59.3 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 24 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 9,278.00 2,466.57 10,620.45 1,342.45- 114.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 192.00 .00 98.25 93.75 51.2 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 9,470.00 2,466.57 10,718.70 1,248.70- 113.2 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3912 FIRE FLOW FEE 110,000.00 13,975.00 113,136.00 3,136.00- 102.9 REVENUE CONTROL 119,470.00 16,441.57 123,854.70 4,384.70- 103.7, FIRE PROTECTION FUND 119,470.00 16,441.57 123,854.70 4,384.70- 103.7 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 25 BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 5,000.00 1,620.55 9,952.25 4,952.25- 199.0 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 361.00 .00 .00 361.00 0.0 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 5,361.00 1,620.55 9,952.25 4,591.25- 185.6 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3936 CONTRIB FROM PROPERTY OWNERS 400,000.00 .00 400,000.00 .00 100.0 REVENUE CONTROL 405,361.00 1,620.55 409,952.25 4,591.25- 101.1' LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 405,361.00 1,620.55 409,952.25 4,591.25- 101.1 • • REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 26 05/20/98 12:41:52 REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 705 INSURANCE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3880 INSURANCE SERVICE CHARGES 1,007,098.00 83,924.00 839,240.00 167,858.00 83.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR REVENUE CONTROL INSURANCE FUND .00 20,000.00 101,860.97 101,860.97- *** 1,007,098.00 103,924.00 941,100.97 65,997.03 93.4 1,007,098.00 103,924.00 941,100.97 65,997.03 93.4, REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3889 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES PAGE 27 BALANCE % COL 486,942.00 40,579.00 405,790.00 81,152.00 83.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3920 BCHD HEALTHY CITIES FUND 63,849.00 .00 63,849.48 .48- 100.0 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 28,062.00 2,078.67 24,128.70 3,933.30 86.0 OTHER REVENUE 91,911.00 2,078.67 87,978.18 3,932.82 95.7 REVENUE CONTROL 578,853.00 42,657.67 493,768.18 85,084.82 85.3, EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 578,853.00 42,657.67 493,768.18 85,084.82 85.3 REVPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:52 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 0 PAGE 28 BALANCE % COL REVENUE CONTROL 23,090,547.00 2,631,766.89 17,005,192.69 6,085,354.31 73.6 GRAND TOTALS 23,090,547.00 2,631,766.89 17,005,192.69 6,085,354.31 73.6 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 1 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1101 CITY COUNCIL 1101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 22,682.00 1,890.00 18,900.11 .00 3,781.89 83.3 1101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,069.00 .00 132.81 .00 1,936.19 6.4 1101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 26,750.00 3,250.00 20,250.00 .00 6,500.00 75.7 1101-4180 RETIREMENT 4,608.00 384.02 3,840.47 .00 767.53 83.3 1101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 26,963.00 2,379.71 23,070.84 .00 3,892.16 85.6 1101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 813.00 114.92 821.40 .00 8.40- 101.0' PERSONAL SERVICES 83,885.00 8,018.65 67,015.63 .00 16,869.37 79.9 1101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 33,416.00 .00 1,019.10 .00 32,396.90 3.0 1101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1101-4304 TELEPHONE 400.00 58.74 275.47 .00 124.53 68.9 1101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5,000.00 454.35 4,315.69 .00 684.31 86.3 1101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 7,000.00 .00 6,811.00 .00 189.00 97.3 1101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 6,320.00 127.21 4,745.95 .00 1,574.05 75.1 1101-4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 3,035.00 1,000.00 3,181.14 .00 146.14- 104.8 1101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 56,420.00 4,702.00 47,020.00 .00 9,400.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 78,175.00 6,342.30 66,349.25 .00 11,825.75 84.9 CITY COUNCIL 195,476.00 14,360.95 134,383.98 .00 61,092.02 68.7 1121 CITY CLERK 1121-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1121-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 42,270.00 3,523.00 34,311.57 .00 7,958.43 81.2 1121-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,406.00 .00 .00 .00 1,406.00 0.0 1121-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 31,484.00 2,661.50 28,523.66 .00 2,960.34 90.6 1121-4180 RETIREMENT 7,606.00 698.31 6,836.80 .00 769.20 89.9 1121-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,350.00 463.67 4,554.34 .00 795.66 85.1 1121-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 943.00 89.67 911.07 .00 31.93 96.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 89,059.00 7,436.15 75,137.44 .00 13,921.56 84.4 1121-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1121-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 12,657.00 144.50 2,125.11 .00 10,531.89 16.8 1121-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 50,000.00 .00 .00 .00 50,000.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 62,657.00 144.50 2,125.11 .00 60,531.89 3.4 1121-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1121-4304 TELEPHONE 750.00 58.94 498.32 .00 251.68 66.4 1121-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,700.00 194.77 2,682.05 .00 2,017.95 57.1 1121-4315 MEMBERSHIP 325.00 .00 270.00 .00 55.00 83.1 1121-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 2,300.00 .00 .00 .00 2,300.00 0.0 1121-4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 10,500.00 346.07 4,722.53 .00 5,777.47 45.0 i EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE '2 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1121-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 3,061.00 255.00 2,550.00 .00 511.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 21,636.00 854.78 10,722.90 .00 10,913.10 49.6 1121-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1121-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 2,556.00 .00 .00 .00 2,556.00 0.0 CITY CLERK 175,908.00 8,435.43 87,985.45 .00 87,922.55 50.0 1131 CITY ATTORNEY 1131-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1131-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 219,815.00 17,624.15 146,959.75 .00 72,855.25 66.9, 1131-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1131-4304 TELEPHONE 285.00 37.08 234.47 .00 50.53 82.3 1131-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 100.00 12.78 94.79 .00 5.21 94.8 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 385.00 49.86 329.26 .00 55.74 85.5 CITY ATTORNEY 220,200.00 17,674.01 147,289.01 .00 72,910.99 66.9 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR 1132-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1132-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,550.00 220.52 2,165.00 .00 385.00 84.9 1132-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1132-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 77,540.00 10,352.50 64,277.96 200.00 13,062.04 83.2 1132-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1132-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 35.33 230.31 .00 69.69 76.8 1132-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 520.00 28.15 504.72 .00 15.28 97.1 1132-4315 MEMBERSHIP 100.00 .00 50.00 .00 50.00 50.0 1132-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 400.00 .00 100.00 .00 300.00 25.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,320.00 63.48 885.03 .00 434.97 67.0 CITY PROSECUTOR 81,410.00 10,636.50 67,327.99 200.00 13,882.01 82.9 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1141-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 15,671.00 1,379.53 12,508.88 .00 3,162.12 79.8 1141-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 946.00 .00 .00 .00 946.00 0.0 1141-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 16,463.00 1,325.50 13,255.00 .00 3,208.00 80.5 1141-4180 RETIREMENT 4,268.00 336.19 3,202.33 .00 1,065.67 75.0 1141-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,279.00 543.87 5,161.30 .00 1,117.70 82.2 1141-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 498.00 39.23 374.00 .00 124.00 75.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 44,125.00 3,624.32 34,501.51 .00 9,623.49 78.2 1141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 9,171.00 208.33 6,639.40 .00 2,531.60 72.4 1141-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 3 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1141-4304 TELEPHONE 650.00 83.55 600.46 .00 49.54 92.4 1141-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,320.00 67.93 1,119.49 .00 200.51 84.8 1141-4315 MEMBERSHIP 75.00 .00 100.00 .00 25.00- 133.3 1141-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,393.00 99.50 1,769.00 .00 376.00- 127.0 1141-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 2,071.00 173.00 1,730.00 .00 341.00 83.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5,509.00 423.98 5,318.95 .00 190.05 96.6 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 694.00 .00 390.62 .00 303.38 56.3 CITY TREASURER 59,499.00 4,256.63 46,850.48 :00 12,648.52 78.7, 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1201 CITY MANAGER 1201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 134,142.00 12,601.14 111,050.12 .00 23,091.88 82.8 1201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,123.00 .00 114.22 .00 6,008.78 1.9 1201-4180 RETIREMENT 15,977.00 1,427.28 12,432.95 .00 3,544.05 77.8 1201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,470.00 1,092.49 10,714.30 .00 3,755.70 74.0. 1201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,832.00 173.36 1,531.51 .00 300.49 83.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 172,544.00 15,294.27 135,843.10 .00 36,700.90 78.7 1201-4200 1201-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 600.00 2.25 179.82 .00 420.18 30.0 1201-4300 _. MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1201-4304 - TELEPHONE 1,000.00 96.77 692.90 .00 307.10 69.3 1201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1,500.00 54.04 889.21 .00 610.79 59.3 1201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,275.00 .00 60.00 .00 1,215.00 4.7 1201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,700.00 42.50 4,331.57 .00 631.57- 117.1 1201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 6,361.00 530.00 5,300.00 .00 1,061.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 13,836.00 723.31 11,273.68 .00 2,562.32 81.5 1201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,200.00 .00 .00 .00 1,200.00 0.0 CITY MANAGER 188,180.00 16,019.83 147,296.60 .00 40,883.40 78.3 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 245,333.00 19,693.33 192,965.25 .00 52,367.75 78.7 1202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 2,950.00 .00 361.52 .00 2,588.48 12.3 1202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 15,015.00 .00 18,021.16 .00 3,006.16- 120.0 1202-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 2,696.00 .00 2,695.30 .00 .70 100.0 1202-4180 RETIREMENT 30,738.00 2,410.61 23,924.91 .00 6,813.09 77.8 1202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21,654.00 1,898.65 17,874.63 .00 3,779.37 82.5 1202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,249.00 140.66 1,307.10 .00 58.10- 104.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 319,635.00 24,143.25 257,149.87 .00 62,485.13 80.5 1202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 4 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1202-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 100,279.00 1,967.15 78,658.30 17,500.00 4,120.70 95.9 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4304 TELEPHONE 2,200.00 286.98 2,038.36 .00 161.64 92.7 1202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 7,839.00 475.82 7,038.49 .00 800.51 89.8 1202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00 .00 320.00 .00 20.00- 106.7 1202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 4,731.00 622.61 2,388.05 50.00 2,292.95 51.5 1202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 4,017.00 335.00 3,350.00 .00 667.00 83.4 1202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 12,186.00 1,015.00 10,150.00 .00 2,036.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 31,273.00 2,735.41 25,284.90 50.00 5,938.10 81.0, FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 451,187.00 28,845.81 361,093.07 17,550.00 72,543.93 83.9 1203 PERSONNEL 1203-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1203-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 47,361.00 4,701.52 35,549.58 .00 11,811.42 75.1 1203-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,026.00 .00 .00 .00 4,026.00 0.0 1203-4180 RETIREMENT 5,750.00 562.60 4,284.91 .00 1,465.09 74.5 1203-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,335.00 155.60 14,442.83 .00 107.83- 100.8 1203-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 313.00 44.44 269.60 .00 43.40 86.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 71,785.00 5,464.16 54,546.92 .00 17,238.08 76.0 1203-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1203-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 31,445.00 1,555.16 37,145.41 .00 5,700.41- 118.1 1203-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 1,000.00 4,213.00 4,213.00 .00 3,213.00- 421.3 CONTRACT SERVICES 32,445.00 5,768.16 41,358.41 .00 8,913.41- 127.5 1203-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1203-4304 TELEPHONE 1,200.00 152.96 970.40 .00 229.60 80.9 1203-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,000.00 440.77 2,658.35 .00 1,341.65 66.5 1203-4315 MEMBERSHIP 920.00 .00 471.00 .00 449.00 51_.2 1203-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 10,857.00 283.74 2,814.83 .00 8,042.17 25.9 1203-4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 24,880.00 1,118.00 14,058.50 .00 10,821.50 56.5 1203-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 5,549.00 462.00 4,620.00 .00 929.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 47,406.00 2,457.47 25,593.08 .00 21,812.92 54.0 PERSONNEL 151,636.00 13,689.79 121,498.41 .00 30,137.59 80.1 1206 DATA PROCESSING 1206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 41,136.00 3,428.00 34,280.00 .00 6,856.00 83.3 1206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 1206-4180 RETIREMENT 5,113.00 426.04 4,260.76 .00 852.24 83.3 1206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,105.00 174.41 1,712.80 .00 392.20 81.4 1206-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 597.00 49.70 497.02 .00 99.98 83.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 48,951.00 4,078.15 40,750.58 .00 8,200.42 83.2 1206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 5 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 40,047.00 2,560.75 25,634.41 .00 14,412.59 64.0 1206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1206-4304 TELEPHONE 5,400.00 237.52 2,149.26 .00 3,250.74 39.8 1206-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,400.00 519.09 2,966.82 .00 1,433.18 67.4 1206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3,000.00 .00 1,506.83 .00 1,493.17 50.2 1206-4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00 .00 80.00 .00 220.00 26.7 1206-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 1206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,920.00 160.00 1,600.00 .00 320.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 16,020.00 916.61 8,302.91 .00 7,717.09 51.8' 1206-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1206-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 4,800.00 .00 3,890.51 .00 909.49 81.1 1206-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 29,100.00 4,361.40 13,534.51 .00 15,565.49 46.5 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 33,900.00 4,361.40 17,425.02 .00 16,474.98 51.4 DATA PROCESSING 138,918.00 11,916.91 92,112.92 .00 46,805.08 66.3 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 1208-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1208-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 39,975.00 3,330.80 33,308.00 .00 6,667.00 83.3 1208-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 375.00 .00 .00 .00 375.00 0.0 1208-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,404.00 480.40 2,767.12 .00 363.12- 115.1 1208-4180 RETIREMENT 4,968.00 413.96 4,140.13 .00 827.87 83.3 1208-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,269.00 196.80 1,931.03 .00 337.97 85.1 1208-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 580.00 55.26 523.07 .00 56.93 90.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 50,571.00 4,477.22 42,669.35 .00 7,901.65 84.4 1208-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1208-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 13,934.00 360.00 10,871.00 .00 3,063.00 78.0 1208-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1208-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 2,621.16 479.24 .00 179.24- 159.7 1208-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 29,537.00- 2,248.99- 27,376.22- 44.38 2,205.16- 92.5 1208-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,826.00 152.00 1,520.00 .00 306.00 83.2 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 27,411.00- 524.17 25,376.98- 44.38 2,078.40- 92.4 1208-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 1208-6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 10,115.00 1,685.80 8,405.90 .00 1,709.10 83.1 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 47,209.00 7,047.19 36,569.27 44.38 10,595.35 77.6 1214 PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES 1214-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1214-4322 UNCLASSIFIED 92,879.00 .00 .00 .00 92,879.00 0.0 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 4 PAGE 6 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1299-4399 BUDGET TRANSFERS OUT 835,242.00 66,778.67 691,648.70 .00 143,593.30 82.8 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE 2101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 2,627,247.00 211,327.76 2,065,547.53 .00 561,699.47 78.6 2101-4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 37,803.00 2,969.02 29,829.00 .00 7,974.00 78.9 2101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 220,514.00 19,351.62 191,031.89 .00 29,482.11 86.6 2101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 269,663.00 8,526.22 219,551.65 .00 50,111.35 81.4 2101-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 34,200.00 2,850.54 28,270.77 .00 5,929.23 82.7 2101-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 8,200.00 531.68 5,069.34 .00 3,130.66 61.8 2101-4118 TRAINING OFFICER 12,651.00 13.16 6,552.43 .00 6,098.57 51.8 2101-4180 RETIREMENT 657,079.00 60,641.69 557,630.34 .00 99,448.66 84.9 2101-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 52,500.00 2,379.16 35,889.09 .00 16,610.91 68.4 2101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 207,696.00 16,736.72 160,411.57 .00 47,284.43 77.2 2101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 24,038.00 1,909.07 20,821.95 .00 3,216.05 86.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 4,151,591.00 327,236.64 3,320,605.56 .00 830,985.44 80.0 2101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 82,835.00 6,118.92 68,370.20 515.23 13,949.57 83.2 2101-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 3,000.00 177.84 911.58 .00 2,088.42 30.4 CONTRACT SERVICES 85,835.00 6,296.76 69,281.78 515.23 16,037.99 81.3 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2101-4304 TELEPHONE 49,000.00 5,043.05 40,333.95 .00 8,666.05 82.3 2101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 31,564.00 2,910.42 26,173.85 286.13 5,104.02 83.8 2101-4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 6,117.00 968.69 5,880.37 464.54 227.91- 103.7 2101-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 2,126.00 187.06 2,779.84 .00 653.84- 130.8 2101-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,600.00 904.26 4,727.71 .00 127.71- 102.8 2101-4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 20,000.00 2,989.04 22,665.50 .00 2,665.50- 113.3 2101-4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 3,300.00 116.00 23.52- .00 3,323.52 0.7- 2101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,235.00 37.70 406.80 .00 828.20 32.9 2101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 13,516.00 159.98 7,971.28 .00 5,544.72 59.0 2101-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 239,406.00 19,950.00 199,500.00 .00 39,906.00 83.3 2101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 400,581.00 33,382.00 333,820.00 .00 66,761.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 771,445.00 66,648.20 644,235.78 750.67 126,458.55 83.6 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 819.00 .00 634.81 .00 184.19 77.5 2101-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 1,504.00 .00 1,503.44 .00 .56 100.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2,323.00 .00 2,138.25 .00 184.75 92.0 POLICE 5,011,194.00 400,181.60 4,036,261.37 1,265.90 973,666.73 80.6 2102 CROSSING GUARD 2102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE 2201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 51,445.00 4,477.39 36,293.43 15,151.57 .00 100.0 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 7 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,159,477.00 83,457.21 961,438.11 .00 198,038.89 82.9 2201-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 190,571.00 23,155.66 159,332.92 .00 31,238.08 83.6 2201-4108 FLSA OVERTIME 77,745.00 22,579.48 77,987.86 .00 242.86- 100.3 2201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 119,183.00 9,897.59 69,078.07 .00 50,104.93 58.0 2201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 25,964.00 948.36 9,768.34 .00 16,195.66 37.6 2201-4119 FITNESS INCENTIVE 9,200.00 .00 4,800.00 .00 4,400.00 52.2 2201-4180 RETIREMENT 244,745.00 23,486.89 219,347.45 .00 25,397.55 89.6 2201-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 17,060.00 629.90 14,976.79 1,356.66 726.55 95.7 2201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 146,528.00 12,319.59 121,505.22 .00 25,022.78 82.9 2201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 12,774.00 1,162.54 10,359.11 .00 2,414.89 81.1, PERSONAL SERVICES 2,003,247.00 177,637.22 1,648,593.87 1,356.66 353,296.47 82.4 2201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,484.00 683.60 16,689.92 .00 3,794.08 81.5 2201-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2,343.00 .00 2,343.13 .00 .13- 100.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 22,827.00 683.60 19,033.05 .00 3,793.95 83.4 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2201-4304 TELEPHONE 6,224.00 593.05 5,318.68 .00 905.32 85.5 2201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,600.00 136.49 3,834.09 .00 765.91 83.3 2201-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 14,484.00 2,436.43 12,525.11 .00 1,958.89 86.5 2201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 2,175.00 .00 2,227.85 .00 52.85- 102.4 2201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 8,200.00 493.79 6,526.97 .00 1,673.03 79.6 2201-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 48,489.00 4,041.00 40,410.00 .00 8,079.00 83.3 2201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 140,668.00 11,722.00 117,220.00 .00 23,448.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 224,840.00 19,422.76 188,062.70 .00 36,777.30 83.6 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2201-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 1,516.00 .00 1,577.21 .00 61.21- 104.0 FIRE 2,252,430.00 197,743.58 1,857,266.83 1,356.66 393,806.51 82.5 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3104 STREET MAINT/TRAFFIC SAFETY 3104-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3104-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 130,076.00 9,793.43 103,235.81 .00 26,840.19 79.4 3104-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,050.00 96.80 787.14 .00 262.86 75.0 3104-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 5,144.00 .00 5,732.18 .00 588.18- 111.4 3104-4180 RETIREMENT 16,240.00 1,216.80 12,826.56 .00 3,413.44 79.0 3104-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,523.00 1,355.49 12,061.03 .00 2,461.97 83.0 3104-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 294.00 21.89 174.34 .00 119.66 59.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 167,327.00 12,484.41 134,817.06 .00 32,509.94 80.6 3104-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3104-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 134,800.00 11,872.50 105,399.52 .00 29,400.48 78.2 3104-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 560.00 .00 413.00 .00 147.00 73.8 CONTRACT SERVICES 135,360.00 11,872.50 105,812.52 .00 29,547.48 78.2 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 001 GENERAL FUND • S CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 8 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3104-4303 UTILITIES 6,910.00 1,536.94 7,502.92 .00 592.92- 108.6 3104-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 36,000.00 4,481.78 31,278.46 625.71 4,095.83 88.6 3104-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 17,358.00 1,447.00 14,470.00 .00 2,888.00 83.4 3104-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 66,756.00 5,563.00 55,630.00 .00 11,126.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 127,024.00 13,028.72 108,881.38 625.71 17,516.91 86.2 3104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3104-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 7,000.00 .00 1,659.47 .00 5,340.53 23.7 STREET MAINT/TRAFFIC SAFETY 436,711.00 37,385.63 351,170.43 625.71 84,914.86 80.6 4100 PLANNING 4101 PLANNING 4101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 147,348.00 12,112.77 127,088.40 .00 20,259.60 86.3 4101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 9,234.00 .00 1,148.61 .00 8,085.39 12.4 4101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 18,230.00 1,735.50 12,162.85 .00 6,067.15 66.7 4101-4180 RETIREMENT 21,403.00 1,784.78 18,193.37 .00 3,209.63 85.0 4101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 13,093.00 1,155.41 11,060.92 .00 2,032.08 84.5 4101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 3,176.00 241.18 2,244.52 .00 931.48 70.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 212,484.00 17,029.64 171,898.67 .00 40,585.33 80.9 4101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4101-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 30,325.00 7,774.51 30,811.37 .00 486.37- 101.6 4101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4101-4304 TELEPHONE 2,100.00 229.96 1,453.17 .00 646.83 69.2 4101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10,599.00 416.60 6,623.59 .00 3,975.41 62.5 4101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 900.00 .00 679.00 .00 221.00 75.4 4101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,500.00 10.00 212.00 .00 3,288.00 6.1 4101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 12,581.00 1,048.00 10,480.00 .00 2,101.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 29,680.00 1,704.56 19,447.76 .00 10,232.24 65.5 4101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 4,277.00 .00 4,257.83 .00 19.17 99.6 PLANNING 276,766.00 26,508.71 226,415.63 .00 50,350.37 81.8 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 BUILDING 4201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 138,740.00 8,066.72 99,723.74 .00 39,016.26 71.9 4201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 8,643.00 .00 1,400.74 .00 7,242.26 16.2 4201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 25,845.00 2,823.30 13,250.60 .00 12,594.40 51.3 4201-4180 RETIREMENT 16,982.00 1,001.04 12,285.55 .00 4,696.45 72.3 4201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 12,337.00 782.03 8,467.71 .00 3,869.29 68.6 4201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 3,920.00 303.47 2,345.71 .00 1,574.29 59.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 206,467.00 12,976.56 137,474.05 .00 68,992.95 66.6 4201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 9 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 335,875.00 25,013.37 133,662.69 .00 202,212.31 39.8 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4304 TELEPHONE 3,830.00 328.76 2,471.96 .00 1,358.04 64.5 4201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5,000.00 297.54 4,397.85 .00 602.15 88.0 4201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,200.00 .00 470.00 .00 730.00 39.2 4201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 7,400.00 .00 1,182.51 .00 6,217.49 16.0 4201-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 9,414.00 784.00 7,840.00 .00 1,574.00 83.3 4201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 11,997.00 1,000.00 10,000.00 .00 1,997.00 83.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 38,841.00 2,410.30 26,362.32 .00 12,478.68 67.9' 4201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4201-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 4201-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 4201-5602 IMPRVMNTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0 BUILDING 583,683.00 40,400.23 297,499.06 .00 286,183.94 51.0 4202 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 4202-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 197,891.00 19,026.29 165,744.80 .00 32,146.20 83.8 4202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 .00 1,079.65 .00 579.65- 215.9 4202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3,712.00 .00 4,261.05 .00 549.05- 114.8 4202-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 218.00 218.00 .00 218.00- *** 4202-4180 RETIREMENT 24,950.00 2,363.68 20,453.05 .00 4,496.95 82.0 4202-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 5,300.00 480.76 3,776.64 .00 1,523.36 71.3 4202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 23,483.00 2,074.26 18,952.72 .00 4,530.28 80.7 4202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,097.00 213.83 1,726.41 .00 370.59 82.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 257,933.00 24,376.82 216,212.32 .00 41,720.68 83.8 4202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4202-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 127,748.00 8,346.99 81,738.02 1,950.00 44,059.98 65.5 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4303, UTILITIES 95,715.00 5,042.74 56,150.45 .00 39,564.55 58.7 4202-4304 TELEPHONE 8,197.00 892.83 8,169.49 .00 27.51 99.7 4202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10,735.00 720.53 7,394.08 16.24 3,324.68 69.0 4202-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 19,653.00 1,364.19 18,142.62 .00 1,510.38 92.3 4202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 500.00 .00 527.00 .00 27.00- 105.4 4202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 8,400.00 724.00 2,955.66 .00 5,444.34 35.2 4202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 24,839.00 2,070.00 20,700.00 .00 4,139.00 83.3 4202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 89,992.00 7,499.00 74,990.00 .00 15,002.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 258,031.00 18,313.29 189,029.30 16.24 68,985.46 73.3 4202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 2,000.00 .00 121.81 .00 1,878.19 6.1 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 10 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 14,699.00 .00 .00 .00 14,699.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 16,699.00 .00 121.81 .00 16,577.19 0.7 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 660,411.00 51,037.10 487,101.45 1,966.24 171,343.31 74.1 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 81,973.00 6,927.36 68,119.01 .00 13,853.99 83.1 4204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,082.00 113.29 1,522.43 .00 440.43- 140.7 4204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 5,748.00 .00 1,272.14 .00 4,475.86 22.1 4204-4180 RETIREMENT 10,045.00 867.68 8,541.20 .00 1,503.80 85.0 4204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10,438.00 905.19 8,878.63 .00 1,559.37 85.1 PERSONAL SERVICES 109,286.00 8,813.52 88,333.41 .00 20,952.59 80.8 4204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4204-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 73,360.00 5,927.50 53,570.96 .00 19,789.04 73.0 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4303 UTILITIES 92,000.00 14,670.57 86,878.50 .00 5,121.50 94.4 4204-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 27,600.00 1,375.51 10,271.09 .00 17,328.91 37.2 4204-4321 BUILDING SFTY/SECURITY 2,850.00 59.34 1,828.95 425.00 596.05 79.1 4204-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 7,567.00 631.00 6,310.00 .00 1,257.00 83.4 4204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 33,641.00 2,803.00 28,030.00 .00 5,611.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 163,658.00 19,539.42 133,318.54 425.00 29,914.46 81.7 4204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4204-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 4,500.00 .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 0.0 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 350,804.00 34,280.44 275,222.91 425.00 75,156.09 78.6 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES - 4601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 174,849.00 12,443.92 143,130.51 .00 31,718.49 81.9 4601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 3,400.00 32.85 126.85 .00 3,273.15 3.7 4601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 11,918.00 1,149.64 7,745.30 .00 4,172.70 65.0 4601-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 125,000.00 9,164.57 91,095.11 .00 33,904.89 72.9 4601-4180 RETIREMENT 25,124.00 1,894.60 21,080.08 .00 4,043.92 83.9 4601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,688.00 1,210.48 13,764.94 .00 923.06 93.7 4601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 5,971.00 401.37 4,099.98 .00 1,871.02 68.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 360,950.00 26,297.43 281,042.77 .00 79,907.23 77.9 4601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 11,566.00 1,018.75 7,879.54 .00 3,686.46 68.1 4601-4221 CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 114,000.00 14,167.70 98,925.45 .00 15,074.55 86.8 CONTRACT SERVICES 125,566.00 15,186.45 106,804.99 .00 18,761.01 85.1 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 001 GENERAL FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 11 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4601-4302 ADVERTISING 17,600.00 .00 11,474.71 .00 6,125.29 65.2 4601-4304 TELEPHONE 4,000.00 490.90 3,327.97 .00 672.03 83.2 4601-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10,500.00 959.44 8,877.21 .00 1,622.79 84.5 4601-4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 18,247.00 1,669.50 12,898.01 340.00 5,008.99 72.5 4601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 400.00 .00 315.54 .00 84.46 78.9 4601-4315 MEMBERSHIP 700.00 .00 740.00 .00 40.00- 105.7 4601-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,870.00 .00 1,930.54 .00 3,939.46 32.9 4601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 8,121.00 677.00 6,770.00 .00 1,351.00 83.4 4601-4396. INSURANCE USER CHARGES 21,655.00 1,805.00 18,050.00 .00 3,605.00 83.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 87,093.00 5,601.84 64,383.98 340.00 22,369.02 74.3' 4601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4601-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 18,998.00 .00 4,276.72 .00 14,721.28 22.5 4601-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 4,834.00 .00 5,072.36 .00 238.36- 104.9 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 23,832.00 .00 9,349.08 .00 14,482.92 39.2 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 597,441.00 47,085.72 461,580.82 340.00 135,520.18 77.3 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8608 PUB WORKS YARD RELOCATION 8608-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8608-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,200.00 .00 49.69 .00 5,150.31 1.0 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 279,163.00 .00 .00 .00 279,163.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL GENERAL FUND 13,142,992.00 1,038,762.12 9,962,917.50 38,925.46 3,141,149.04 76.1 13,142,992.00 1,038,762.12 9,962,917.50 38,925.46 3,141,149.04 76.1 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 12 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 146.00 .00 81.67 .00 64.33 55.9 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 16,370.00 1,364.17 13,641.70 .00 2,728.30 83.3, 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 LTNG/LANDSCAPING (MEDIANS) 2601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 170,276.00 14,223.41 134,960.48 .00 35,315.52 79.3 2601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,773.00 .00 477.86 .00 1,295.14 27.0 2601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,135.00 .00 3,880.11 .00 2,254.89 63.2 2601-4180 RETIREMENT 21,057.00 1,770.01 16,944.48 .00 4,112.52 80.5 2601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,067.00 1,297.02 12,119.69 .00 1,947.31 86.2 2601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,697.00 139.17 1,371.91 .00 325.09 80.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 215,005.00 17,429.61 169,754.53 .00 45,250.47 79.0 2601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 67,355.00 6.60 54,147.53 .00 13,207.47 80.4 2601-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 20,500.00 2,114.80 9,505.82 .00 10,994.18 46.4 CONTRACT SERVICES 87,855.00 2,121.40 63,653.35 .00 24,201.65 72.5 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4303 UTILITIES 134,000.00 9,658.20 101,412.60 .00 32,587.40 75.7 2601-4304 TELEPHONE 250.00 .00 .00 .00 250.00 0.0 2601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 20,700.00 3,971.23 18,727.24 1,941.14 31.62 99.8 2601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 23,908.00 1,992.00 19,969.62 .00 3,938.38 83.5 2601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 26,042.00 2,170.00 21,700.00 .00 4,342.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 204,900.00 17,791.43 161,809.46 1,941.14 41,149.40 79.9 LTNG/LANDSCAPING (MEDIANS) 507,760.00 37,342.44 395,217.34 1,941.14 110,601.52 78.2 8100 STREET SAFETY 8153 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 14TH 8153-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8153-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,000.00 .00 2,230.00 .00 2,770.00 44.6 8156 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 13TH 8156-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8156-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,000.00 .00 2,243.22 .00 2,756.78 44.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 534,276.00 38,706.61 413,413.93 1,941.14 118,920.93 77.7 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 534,276.00 38,706.61 413,413.93 1,941.14 118,920.93 77.7 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 13 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 61.00 .00 31.76 .00 29.24 52.1 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 8,955.00 162.92 8,629.20 .00 325.80 96.4' 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3301 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 3301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 20,228.00 1,364.06 14,582.96 .00 5,645.04 72.1 3301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 838.00 .00 140.07 .00 697.93 16.7 3301-4180 RETIREMENT 2,488.00 196.59 2,061.29 .00 426.71 82.8 3301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,665.00 135.24 1,331.96 .00 333.04 80.0 3301-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 297.00 23.39 247.22 .00 49.78 83.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 25,516.00 1,719.28 18,363.50 .00 7,152.50 72.0 3301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 69,677.00 5,072.70 39,171.78 .00 30,505.22 56.2 3301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3301-4302 ADVERTISING 14,773.00 .00 .00 .00 14,773.00 0.0 3301-4304 TELEPHONE 200.00 .00 66.60 .00 133.40 33.3 3301-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 700.00 .00 129.47 .00 570.53 18.5 3301-4331 DOWNTOWN BANNER PROGRAM .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 3301-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 910.00 76.00 760.00 .00 150.00 83.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 16,583.00 76.00 956.07 .00 15,626.93 5.8 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 111,776.00 6,867.98 58,491.35 .00 53,284.65 52.3 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8160-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 34,632.00 28,860.00 28,860.00 .00 5,772.00 83.3 8160-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 4,243.00 3,536.00 3,536.00 .00 707.00 83.3 8160-4180 RETIREMENT 4,305.00 3,587.00 3,587.00 .00 718.00 83.3 8160-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,251.00 1,042.00 1,042.00 .00 209.00 83.3 8160-4189 FICA 826.00 688.00 688.00 .00 138.00 83.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 45,257.00 37,713.00 37,713.00 .00 7,544.00 83.3 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 6,113.00 .00 51,614.70 748.95 46,250.65- 856.6 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 51,370.00 37,713.00 89,327.70 748.95 38,706.65- 175.3 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 172,162.00 44,743.90 156,480.01 748.95 14,933.04 91.3 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 172,162.00 44,743.90 156,480.01 748.95 14,933.04 91.3 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH . PAGE 14 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 110 PARKING FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 7.00 .00 20.95 .00 13.95- 299.3 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1204 FINANCE CASHIER 1204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 160,088.00 14,305.83 132,676.68 .00 27,411.32 82.9' 1204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,000.00 .00 8.65 .00 991.35 0.9 1204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,050.00 .00 2,733.17 .00 1,316.83 67.5 1204-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 13,116.00 .00 475.64 .00 12,640.36 3.6 1204-4180 RETIREMENT 22,797.00 1,781.33 16,585.96 .00 6,211.04 72.8 1204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21,178.00 1,595.81 13,904.66 .00 7,273.34 65.7 1204-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,618.00 132.04 1,171.22 .00 446.78 72.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 223,847.00 17,815.01 167,555.98 .00 56,291.02 74.9 1204-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1204-4201, CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 25,349.00 809.33 15,948.96 60.00 9,340.04 63.2 1204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1204-4304 TELEPHONE 2,741.00 266.78 2,074.25 .00 666.75 75.7 1204-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 26,286.00 2,506.95 19,042.26 .00 7,243.74 72.4 1204-4315 MEMBERSHIP 155.00 .00 125.00 .00 30.00 80.6 1204-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,232.00 .00 1,193.20 50.00 1,988.80 38.5 1204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 8,198.00 683.00 6,830.00 .00 1,368.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 40,612.00 3,456.73 29,264.71 50.00 11,297.29 72.2. 1204-4900 DEPRECIATION 1204-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 90.00 .00 .00 .00 90.00 0.0 1204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1204-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 932.00 .00 .00 .00 932.00 0.0 1204-5402 _. EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 4,400.00 .00 .00 .00 4,400.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 5,332.00 .00 .00 .00 5,332.00 0.0 FINANCE CASHIER 295,230.00 22,081.07 212,769.65 110.00 82,350.35 72.1 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 794,224.00 66,185.33 661,853.30 .00 132,370.70 83.3 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3302-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 458,472.00 20,687.60 377,277.98 .00 81,194.02 82.3 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 110 PARKING FUND • a CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 15 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3302-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 8,000.00 266.75 6,620.21 .00 1,379.79 82.8 3302-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 24,439.00 15,450.47 41,005.14 .00 16,566.14- 167.8 3302-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 43,003.00 2,168.00 17,090.51 .00 25,912.49 39.7 3302-4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4,100.00 191.51 2,669.91 .00 1,430.09 65.1 3302-4180 RETIREMENT 67,950.00 1,496.61 58,033.46 .00 9,916.54 85.4 3302-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 4,600.00 575.59 3,245.28 .00 1,354.72 70.5 3302-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 42,426.00_ _2,513.05 35,215.88 .00- 7,210.12 -83.0 3302-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 7,763.00 266.75 2,922.91 .00 4,840.09 37.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 660,753.00 43,616.33 544,081.28 .00 116,671.72 82.3 3302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3302-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 7,200.00 154.25 4,815.49 .00 2,384.51 66.9 3302-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 3,500.00 268.01 1,977.85 .00 1,522.15 56.5 CONTRACT SERVICES 10,700.00 422.26 6,793.34 .00 3,906.66 63.5 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4304 TELEPHONE 4,000.00 372.67 2,748.04 .00 1,251.96 68.7 3302-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9,452.00 153.20 8,274.81 .00 1,177.19 87.5 3302-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1,600.00 1,475.95 1,475.95 855.17 . 731.12- 145.7 3302-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 7,548.00 1,669.39 5,902.36 .00 1,645.64 78.2 3302-4315 MEMBERSHIP 225.00 .00 .00 .00 225.00 0.0 3302-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 2,500.00 300.00 1,037.00 .00 1,463.00 41.5 3302-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 86,267.00 7,189.00 71,890.00 .00 14,377.00 83.3 3302-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 54,673.00 4,556.00 45,560.00 .00 9,113.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 166,265.00 15,716.21 136,888.16 855.17 28,521.67 82.8 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 1,047.00 .00 .00 .00 1,047.00 0.0 3302-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS 560.00 .00 .00 .00 560.00 0.0 3302-4904 DEPRECIATION/IMPROVMNTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** DEPRECIATION 1,607.00 .00 .00 .00 1,607.00 0.0 COMMUNITY SERVICES 839,325.00 59,754.80 687,762.78 855.17 150,707.05 82.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,928,786.00 148,021.20 1,562,406.68 965.17 365,414.15 81.1 PARKING FUND 1,928,786.00 148,021.20 1,562,406.68 965.17 365,414.15 81.1 • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 16 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 15.00 .00 8.36 .00 6.64 55.7 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 340,988.00 28,415.67 284,156.70 .00 56,831.30 83.3' 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERVICE PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EXPENDITURE CONTROL 341,003.00 28,415.67 284,165.06 .00 56,837.94 83.3 STATE GAS TAX FUND 341,003.00 28,415.67 284,165.06 .00 56,837.94 83.3 • • EXPPRIN2 -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 17 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 117 AB939 FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 38.00 .00 20.44 .00 17.56 53.8 5300 AB939 5301 SRCE REDCTN/RECYCLE ELEMENT 5301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 5301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 14,834.00 1,333.15 12,456.10 .00 2,377.90 84.0, 5301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN .00 .00 130.65 .00 130.65- *** 5301-4180 RETIREMENT 1,771.00 159.58 1,486.57 .00 284.43 83.9 5301-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,491.00 122.63 1,210.98 .00 280.02 81.2 5301-4189 FICA 217.00 19.52 185.14 .00 31.86 85.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 18,313.00 1,634.88 15,469.44 .00 2,843.56 84.5 5301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 5301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 40,000.00 10,000.00 10,200.00 .00 29,800.00 25.5 5301-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5301-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 SRCE REDCTN/RECYCLE ELEMENT 59,813.00 11,634.88 25,669.44 .00 34,143.56 42.9 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 59,851.00 11,634.88 25,689.88 .00 34,161.12 42.9 AB939 FUND 59,851.00 11,634.88 25,689.88 .00 34,161.12 42.9 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 18 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 19.00 .00 10.66 .00 8.34 56.1 8100 STREET SAFETY 8141 STREET REHAB 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 60,779.00 .00 .00 .00 60,779.00 0.0' EXPENDITURE CONTROL 60,798.00 .00 10.66 .00 60,787.34 0.0 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 60,798.00 .00 10.66 .00 60,787.34 0.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 19 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 17,164.00 1,430.33 14,303.30 .00 2,860.70 83.3 8500 PARKS 8506 PARK & BEACH IMPROVEMENTS 8506-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8506-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ***. 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,000,000.00 .00 43,148.46 72,797.80 884,053.74 11.6 8624 DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C 8624-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8624-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 500,000.00 13,608.68 238,885.84 160,347.12 100,767.04 79.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,517,164.00 15,039.01 296,337.60 233,144.92 987,681.48 34.9 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 1,517,164.00 15,039.01 296,337.60 233,144.92 987,681.48 34.9 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 20 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 56.00 .00 26.52 .00 29.48 47.4 8500 PARKS 8515 SO SCHOOL PARK 8515-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8515-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ***, 8523 NOBLE PARK 8523-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8523-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 4,237.00 .00 4,097.55 .00 139.45 96.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 4,293.00 .00 4,124.07 .00 168.93 96.1 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 4,293.00 .00 4,124.07 .00 168.93 96.1 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 21 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 379.00 .00 209.03 .00 169.97 55.2 8500 PARKS 8506 PARK & BEACH IMPROVEMENTS 8506-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8506-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 123,267.00 .00 15,715.42 7,267.50 100,284.08 18.6• 8508 PARK IRRIGATION 8508-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8508-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 9,058.00 7,548.00 7,548.00 .00 1,510.00 83.3 8508-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 1,110.00 1,470.00- 925.00 .00 185.00 83.3 8508-4180 RETIREMENT 1,125.00 938.00 938.00 .00 187.00 83.4 8508-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 328.00 273.00 273.00 .00 55.00 83.2 8508-4189 FICA 215.00 4.13- 179.10 .00 35.90 83.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 11,836.00 7,284.87 9,863.10 .00 1,972.90 83.3 8508-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8508-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 448,164.00 .00 9,138.69 6,494.11 432,531.20 3.5 PARK IRRIGATION 460,000.00 7,284.87 19,001.79 6,494.11 434,504.10 5.5 8514 ATSF R -R -O -W PURCHASE 8514-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8514-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 273.00 .00 272.69 .00 .31 99.9 8525 COMM CTR SKATE BOARD TRACK 8525-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8525-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,865.00 1,554.00 1,554.00 .00 311.00 83.3 8525-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 228.00 190.00 190.00 .00 38.00 83.3 8525-4180 RETIREMENT 232.00 193.00 193.00 .00 39.00 83.2 8525-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 67.00 56.00 56.00 .00 11.00 83.6 8525-4189 FICA 45.00 38.00 38.00 .00 7.00 84.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,437.00 2,031.00 2,031.00 .00 406.00 83.3 8525-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8525-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 238,823.00 86.06 86.06 .00 238,736.94 0.0 COMM CTR SKATE BOARD TRACK 241,260.00 2,117.06 2,117.06 .00 239,142.94 0.9 8526 COMMUNITY CTR TENNIS CENTER 8526-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8526-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,865.00 1,554.00 1,554.00 .00 311.00 83.3 8526-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 228.00 190.00 190.00 .00 38.00 83.3 8526-4180 RETIREMENT 232.00 193.00 193.00 .00 39.00 83.2 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 22 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8526-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 67.00 56.00 56.00 .00 11.00 83.6 8526-4189 FICA 45.00 38.00 38.00 .00 7.00 84.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,437.00 2,031.00 2,031.00 .00 406.00 83.3 8526-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8526-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 12,963.00 .00 .00 .00 12,963.00 0.0 COMMUNITY CTR TENNIS CENTER 15,400.00 2,031.00 2,031.00 .00 13,369.00 13.2 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EXPENDITURE CONTROL 840,579.00 11,432.93 39,346.99 13,761.61 787,470.40 6.3 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 840,579.00 11,432.93 39,346.99 13,761.61 787,470.40 6.3 • . EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 23 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 37.00 .00 20.66 .00 16.34 55.8 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 133,799.00 .00 5,976.00 12,382.50 115,440.50 13.7 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 133,836.00 .00 5,996.66 12,382.50 115,456.84 13.7 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 133,836.00 .00 5,996.66 12,382.50 115,456.84 13.7 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 24 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 94,303.00 .00 12,323.17 .00 81,979.83 13.1 8623 COMMUNITY CENTER REMODEL 8623-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8623-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 148,632.00 .00 .00 .00 148,632.00 0.0 / 8626 ADA COMP/PARKS/COMM SERV/STRTS 8626-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8626-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 5,436.00 289.40 2,640.59 .00 2,795.41 48.6 8626-4180 RETIREMENT 674.00 40.13 396.41 .00 277.59 58.8 8626-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 724.00 10.78 244.71 .00 479.29 33.8 8626-4189 FICA 79.00 3.75 9.17 .00 69.83 11.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,913.00 344.06 3,290.88 .00 3,622.12 47.6 8626-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8626-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 135,681.00 .00 8.50 .00 135,672.50 0.0 ADA COMP/PARKS/COMM SERV/STRTS 142,594.00 344.06 3,299.38 .00 139,294.62 2.3 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 385,529.00 344.06 15,622.55 .00 369,906.45 4.1 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 385,529.00 344.06 15,622.55 .00 369,906.45 4.1 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 25 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 31.00 .00 15.55 .00 15.45 50.2 3400 PUBLIC TRANSIT 3401 DIAL A RIDE 3401-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3401-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 26,300.00 2,293.48 21,170.77 .00 5,129.23 80.5' 3401-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3401-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 229,576.00 .00 88,690.71 .00 140,885.29 38.6 3401-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3401-4304 TELEPHONE 50.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 0.0 3401-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 .00 10.56 .00 489.44 2.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 550.00 .00 10.56 .00 539.44 1.9 DIAL A RIDE 256,426.00 2,293.48 109,872.04 .00 146,553.96 42.8 3403 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 3403-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3403-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 750.00 80.19 452.27 .00 297.73 60.3 3403-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3403-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5,000.00 496.00 2,528.00 252.00 2,220.00 55.6 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 5,750.00 576.19 2,980.27 252.00 2,517.73 56.2 3408 COMMUTER XPRESS 3408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,600.00 156.58 1,302.34 .00 297.66 81.4 3408-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3408-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 10,600.00 .00 .00 .00 10,600.00 0.0 COMMUTER XPRESS 12,200.00 156.58 1,302.34 .00 10,897.66 10.7 3409 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 3409-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3409-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,800.00 122.36 1,533.46 .00 266.54 85.2 3409-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3409-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 12,000.00 327.88 8,563.86 .00 3,436.14 71.4 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 13,800.00 450.24 10,097.32 .00 3,702.68 73.2 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 288,207.00 3,476.49 124,267.52 252.00 163,687.48 43.2 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 288,207.00 3,476.49 124,267.52 252.00 163,687.48 43.2 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 26 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 123.00 .00 63.72 .00 59.28 51.8 8100 STREET SAFETY 8150 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 16TH 8150-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8150-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 30,000.00 .00 .00 .00 30,000.00 0.0' EXPENDITURE CONTROL 30,123.00 .00 63.72 .00 30,059.28 0.2 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 30,123.00 .00 63.72 .00 30,059.28 0.2 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 27 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 150 GRANTS FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 60,744.00 .00 60,743.28 .00 .72 100.0 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 90,000.00 .00 .00 .00 90,000.00 0.0, 8624 DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C 8624-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8624-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,100,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,100,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,250,744.00 .00 60,743.28 .00 1,190,000.72 4.9 GRANTS FUND 1,250,744.00 .00 60,743.28 .00 1,190,000.72 4.9 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 28 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.37. OF BUDGET YEAR) 151 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE '4 USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2100 POLICE 2104 SPEED ENFORCEMENT/EDUC PROGRAM 2104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2104-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 561.00 .00 1,860.70 .00 1,299.70- 331.7 2104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2104-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 738.00 .00 728.52 .00 9.48 98.7 2104-5402 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 2,249.00 .00 .00 .00 2,249.00 0.0 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2,987.00 .00 728.52 .00 2,258.48 24.4' SPEED ENFORCEMENT/EDUC PROGRAM 3,548.00 .00 2,589.22 .00 958.78 73.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 3,548.00 .00 2,589.22 .00 958.78 73.0 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND 3,548.00 .00 2,589.22 .00 958.78 73.0 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 29 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 3.00 .00 1.81 .00 1.19 60.3 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 23,600.00 1,966.67 19,666.70 .00 3,933.30 83.3' 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3701-4327 AQMD INCENTIVES 1,500.00 65.00 510.00 .00 990.00 34.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 25,103.00 2,031.67 20,178.51 .00 4,924.49 80.4 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 25,103.00 2,031.67 20,178.51 .00 4,924.49 80.4 • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 30 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 12.00 .00 4.42 .00 7.58 36.8 2100 POLICE 2106 C.O.P.S. PROGRAM 2106-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2106-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,500.00 .00 3,000.00 .00 2,500.00 54.5, 2106-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2106-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES 2,600.00 57.41- 1,818.59 753.28 28.13 98.9 2106-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1,350.00 .00 148.87 .00 1,201.13 11.0 2106-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3,950.00 57.41- 1,967.46 753.28 1,229.26 68.9 2106-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2106-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 6,890.00 1,853.36 2,091.51 .00 4,798.49 30.4 2106-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 20,597.00 6,184.75 12,199.67 5,150.00 3,247.33 84.2 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 27,487.00 8,038.11 14,291.18 5,150.00 8,045.82 70.7 2106-5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 2106-5602 IMPRVMNTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 9,800.00 2,984.04 2,984.04 .00 6,815.96 30.4 C.O.P.S. PROGRAM 46,737.00 10,964.74 22,242.68 5,903.28 18,591.04 60.2 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 46,749.00 10,964.74 22,247.10 5,903.28 18,598.62 60.2 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 46,749.00 10,964.74 22,247.10 5,903.28 18,598.62 60.2 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 31 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM EXPENDITURE CONTROL CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 1.00 .00 .05 .00 .95 5.0 1.00 .00 .05 .00 .95 5.0 1.00 .00 .05 .00 .95 5.0 • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 32 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 160 SEWER FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 450.00 .00 246.32 .00 203.68 54.7 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 3102-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3102-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 187,773.00 15,668.33 140,241.73 .00 47,531.27 74.7' 3102-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 5,993.00 440.02 6,123.62 .00 130.62- 102.2 3102-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 5,245.00 .00 8,371.22 .00 3,126.22- 159.6 3102-4180 RETIREMENT 23,127.00 1,937.65 17,308.49 .00 5,818.51 74.8 3102-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 20,892.00 1,793.67 16,376.76 .00 4,515.24 78.4 3102-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,940.00 161.49 1,467.57 .00 472.43 75.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 244,970.00 20,001.16 189,889.39 .00 55,080.61 77.5 3102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 104,336.00 2,622.50 71,907.96 14,870.76 17,557.28 83.2 3102-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOV'T 3,400.00 414.29 414.29 .00 2,985.71 12.2 CONTRACT SERVICES 107,736.00 3,036.79 72,322.25 14,870.76 20,542.99 80.9 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4303 UTILITIES 1,035.00 67.76 851.39 .00 183.61 82.3 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12,000.00 8,647.54 15,359.21 .00 3,359.21- 128.0 3102-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 17,556.00 1,463.00 14,635.06 .00 2,920.94 83.4 3102-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 36,817.00 3,068.00 30,680.00 .00 6,137.00 83.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 67,408.00 13,246.30 61,525.66 .00 5,882.34 91.3 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 420,114.00 36,284.25 323,737.30 14,870.76 81,505.94 80.6 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 200,000.00 .00 1,844.41 .00 198,155.59 0.9 8160-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8160-4305 OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 .00 14.59 .00 14.59- *** DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 200,000.00 .00 1,859.00 .00 198,141.00 0.9 8300 STORM DRAIN 8301 MISC STORM DRAINS 8301-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8301-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 80,000.00 .00 2,239.46 .00 77,760.54 2.8 8302 NPDES IMPROVEMENTS 8302-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 160 SEWER FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 33 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE Y. USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8302-4102 REGULAR SALARIES .00 .00 1,135.87 .00 1,135.87- *** 8302-4180 RETIREMENT .00 .00 228.29 .00 228.29- *** 8302-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 .00 46.19 .00 46.19- *** 8302-4189 FICA .00 .00 28.30 .00 28.30- *** PERSONAL SERVICES .00 .00 1,438.65 .00 1,438.65- *** 8302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8302-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 75,000.00 12,110.00 26,910.50 10,319.50 37,770.00 49.6 NPDES IMPROVEMENTS 75,000.00 12,110.00 28,349.15 10,319.50 36,331.35 51.6 8303 14TH STREET STORM DRAIN 8303-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8303-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 115,000.00 .00 .00 .00 115,000.00 0.0 8400 SANITARY SEWER 8408 SANITARY SEWER 8408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 50,987.00 36,852.00- 4,882.50 .00 46,104.50 9.6 8408-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 8408-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 457.00 2,014.00- 381.00 .00 76.00 83.4 8408-4180 RETIREMENT 6,398.00 4,579.20- 717.16 .00 5,680.84 11.2 8408-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,755.00 1,330.64- 140.20 .00 1,614.80 8.0 8408-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 782.00 687.76- 115.89 .00 666.11 14.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 60,379.00 45,463.60- 6,236.75 .00 54,142.25 10.3 8408-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8408-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 500,000.00 .00 229,497.19 7,200.00 263,302.81 47.3 8408-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8408-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 2,002.00 167.00 1,670.00 .00 332.00 83.4 SANITARY SEWER 562,381.00 45,296.60- 237,403.94 7,200.00 317,777.06 43.5 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8620 PIER RENOVATION 8620-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8620-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,452,945.00 3,097.65 593,835.17 32,390.26 826,719.57 43.1 SEWER FUND 1,452,945.00 3,097.65 593,835.17 32,390.26 826,719.57 43.1 • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 34 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 40.00 .00 22.03 .00 17.97 55.1 2100 POLICE 2103 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 2103-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2103-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 7,500.00 .00 835.69 .00 6,664.31 11.1, 2103-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2103-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 92,715.00 .00 549.37 .00 92,165.63 0.6 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 100,215.00 .00 1,385.06 .00 98,829.94 1.4 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 53,000.00 .00 .00 .00 53,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 153,255.00 .00 1,407.09 .00 151,847.91 0.9 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 153,255.00 .00 1,407.09 .00 151,847.91 0.9 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 35 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 54.00 .00 27.02 .00 26.98 50.0 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 48,489.00 4,040.75 40,407.50 .00 8,081.50 83.3' 2200 FIRE 2202 FIRE PROTECTION 2202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 2,300.00 .00 1,711.46 .00 588.54 74.4 2202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 25,599.00 .00 12,194.04 .00 13,404.96 47.6 FIRE PROTECTION 27,899.00 .00 13,905.50 .00 13,993.50 49.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 76,442.00 4,040.75 54,340.02 .00 22,101.98 71.1 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 76,442.00 4,040.75 54,340.02 .00 22,101.98 71.1 • • EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 36 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-6700 INTEREST 1141-6750 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 103.00 .00 4.23 .00 98.77 4.1 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 400,000.00 5,000.00 261,000.00 .00 139,000.00 65.3' EXPENDITURE CONTROL 400,103.00 5,000.00 261,004.23 .00 139,098.77 65.2 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 400,103.00 5,000.00 261,004.23 .00 139,098.77 65.2 • • EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 37 05/20/98 12:41:04 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) 306 LOMA/MYRTLE UNDRGRND DISTRICT ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 8100 STREET SAFETY 8182 UTIL UNDRGRND/MYRTLE AVE 8182-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8182-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,000.00 1,075.00 7,562.50 .00 12,437.50 37.8 8183 UTIL UNDRGRND/LOMA DR 8183-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8183-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,000.00 1,075.00 7,562.50 .00 12,437.50 37.8 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 40,000.00 2,150.00 15,125.00 .00 24,875.00 37.8 LOMA/MYRTLE UNDRGRND DISTRICT 40,000.00 2,150.00 15,125.00 .00 24,875.00 37.8 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 705 INSURANCE FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 38 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1209 LIABILITY INSURANCE 1209-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1209-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 30,470.00 2,350.72 17,765.92 .00 12,704.08 58.3 1209-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,824.00 .00 .00 .00 1,824.00 0.0 1209-4180 RETIREMENT 3,656.00 281.24 2,142.64 .00 1,513.36 58.6 1209-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,129.00 254.37 1,910.02 .00 1,218.98 61.0 1209-4189 FICA .00 22.22 133.32 .00 133.32- *** PERSONAL SERVICES 39,079.00 2,908.55 21,951.90 .00 17,127.10 56.2' 1209-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1209-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 99,700.00 2,193.75 58,424.75 .00 41,275.25 58.6 1209-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1209-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 37.01 ' 174.31 .00 325.69 34.9 1209-4315 MEMBERSHIP 320.00 .00 270.00 .00 50.00 84.4 1209-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,000.00 .00 200.00 .00 800.00 20.0 1209-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 350,000.00 3,844.54 148,098.39 .00 201,901.61 42.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 351,820.00 3,881.55 148,742.70 .00 203,077.30 42.3 LIABILITY INSURANCE 490,599.00 8,983.85 229,119.35 .00 261,479.65 46.7 1210 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 1210-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1210-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 25,000.00 .00 19,647.00 .00 5,353.00 78.6 1210-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1210-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 15,000.00 .00 .00 .00 15,000.00 0.0 AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 40,000.00 .00 19,647.00 .00 20,353.00 49.1 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT 1215-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1215-4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 27,000.00 .00 14,226.00 .00 12,774.00 52.7 1217 WORKERS COMPENSATION 1217-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1217-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 30,470.00 2,350.76 17,766.23 .00 12,703.77 58.3 1217-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,722.00 .00 .00 .00 1,722.00 0.0 1217-4180 RETIREMENT 3,656.00 281.28 2,142.96 .00 1,513.04 58.6 1217-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,129.00 254.41 1,910.59 .00 1,218.41 61.1 1217-4189 FICA .00 22.22 133.36 .00 133.36- *** PERSONAL SERVICES 38,977.00 2,908.67 21,953.14 .00 17,023.86 56.3 1217-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1217-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 49,900.00 32,171.13- 35,649.32 .00 14,250.68 71.4 1217-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 4,500.00 .00 4,442.29 .00 57.71 98.7 CONTRACT SERVICES 54,400.00 32,171.13- 40,091.61 .00 14,308.39 73.7 1217-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 705 INSURANCE FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 39 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1217-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 800.00 37.35 197.89 .00 602.11 24.7 1217-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 1,000.00 .00 162.70 .00 837.30 16.3 1217-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 350,000.00 61,480.30 529,558.58 .00 179,558.58- 151.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 351,800.00 61,517.65 529,919.17 .00 178,119.17- 150.6 WORKERS COMPENSATION 445,177.00 32,255.19 591,963.92 .00 146,786.92- 133.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,002,776.00 41,239.04 854,956.27 .00 147,819.73 85.3 INSURANCE FUND 1,002,776.00 41,239.04 854,956.27 .00 147,819.73 85.3 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 40 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 75.00 .00 9.40 .00 65.60 12.5 1202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 50.00 .00 12.70 .00 37.30 25.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 125.00 .00 22.10 .00 102.90 17.7 1202-4900 DEPRECIATION 1202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0' FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1,625.00 .00 22.10 .00 1,602.90 1.4 1208 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS 1208-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1208-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 35,683.00 .00 35,682.46 .00 .54 100.0 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE 2101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2101-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 28,735.00 1,499.44 21,132.45 .00 7,602.55 73.5 2101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 28,823.00 3,322.74 29,224.02 1,589.61 1,990.63- 106.9 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 57,558.00 4,822.18 50,356.47 1,589.61 5,611.92 90.2 2101-4900 DEPRECIATION 2101-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 100,124.00 .00 .00 .00 100,124.00 0.0 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5403 VEHICLES 108,862.00 .00 100,396.01 .00 8,465.99 92.2 POLICE 266,544.00 4,822.18 150,752.48 1,589.61 114,201.91 57.2 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 5,650.00 221.49 3,472.62 .00 2,177.38 61.5 2201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 6,000.00 446.12 3,180.55 138.93 2,680.52 55.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 11,650.00 667.61 6,653.17 138.93 4,857.90 58.3 2201-4900 DEPRECIATION 2201-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 33,650.00 .00 .00 .00 33,650.00 0.0 2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2201-5403 VEHICLES 288,612.00 .00 269,180.70 .00 19,431.30 93.3 FIRE 333,912.00 667.61 275,833.87 138.93 57,939.20 82.6 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 41 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 3,175.00 154.59 1,936.04 .00 1,238.96 61.0 2601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 3,300.00 36.95 3,222.24 378.57 300.81- 109.1 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6,475.00 191.54 5,158.28 378.57 938.15 85.5 2601-4900 DEPRECIATION 2601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 13,400.00 .00 .00 .00 13,400.00 0.0 2601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2601-5403 VEHICLES 25,000.00 .00 .00 .00 25,000.00 0.0 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 44,875.00 191.54 5,158.28 378.57 39,338.15 12.3' 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 8,510.00 .00 .00 .00 8,510.00 0.0 3102-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,075.00 149.00 1,654.38 .00 579.38- 153.9 3102-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,200.00 659.28 1,918.74 .00 718.74- 159.9 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 10,785.00 808.28 3,573.12 .00 7,211.88 33.1 3102-4900 DEPRECIATION 3102-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 9,700.00 .00 .00 .00 9,700.00 0.0 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 20,485.00 808.28 3,573.12 .00 16,911.88 17.4 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,825.00 104.24 2,008.83 .00 816.17 71.1 3104-4311 AUTO"MAINTENANCE 3,500.00 245.55 1,434.98 .00 2,065.02 41.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6,325.00 349.79 3,443.81 .00 2,881.19 54.4 3104-4900 DEPRECIATION 3104-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 6,250.00 .00 .00 .00 6,250.00 0.0 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 12,575.00 349.79 3,443.81 .00 9,131.19 27.4 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 8,500.00 257.34 4,901.74 .00 3,598.26 57.7 3302-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 9,500.00 773.25 8,946.74 108.25 445.01 95.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 18,000.00 1,030.59 13,848.48 108.25 4,043.27 77.5 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 23,622.00 .00 .00 .00 23,622.00 0.0 3302-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3302-5403 VEHICLES 20,381.00 .00 20,381.00 .00 .00 100.0 COMMUNITY SERVICES 62,003.00 1,030.59 34,229.48 108.25 27,665.27 55.4 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 42 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3701-5403 VEHICLES 61,600.00 .00 22,928.10 .00 38,671.90 37.2 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 625.00 49.79 481.63 .00 143.37 77.1 4201-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,100.00 81.01 917.83 .00 182.17 83.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,725.00 130.80 1,399.46 .00 325.54 81.1 4201-4900 DEPRECIATION 4201-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 4,500.00 .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 0.0 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 6,225.00 130.80 1,399.46 .00 4,825.54 22.5 4202 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,400.00 155.81 953.00 .00 447.00 68.1 4202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,500.00 370.14 2,472.19 .00 27.81 98.9 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3,900.00 525.95 3,425.19 .00 474.81 87.8 4202-4900 DEPRECIATION 4202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 9,500.00 .00 .00 .00 9,500.00 0.0 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 13,400.00 525.95 3,425.19 .00 9,974.81 25.6 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,150.00 105.91 804.04 .00 345.96 69.9 4204-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 800.00 .00 1,083.07 .00 283.07- 135.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,950.00 105.91 1,887.11 .00 62.89 96.8 4204-4900 DEPRECIATION 4204-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 834.00 .00 .00 .00 834.00 0.0 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,784.00 105.91 1,887.11 .00 896.89 67.8 4206 EQUIPMENT SERVICE 4206-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4206-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 79,183.00 3,813.54 38,135.47 .00 41,047.53 48.2 4206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,676.00 .00 550.03 .00 1,125.97 32.8 4206-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY .00 2,197.00 20,562.75 .00 20,562.75- *** 4206-4180 RETIREMENT 9,841.00 578.40 5,194.44 .00 4,646.56 52.8 4206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,312.00 363.88 3,564.29 .00 4,747.71 42.9 4206-4189 FICA 485.00 31.86 1,008.05 .00 523.05- 207.8 PERSONAL SERVICES 99,497.00 6,984.68 69,015.03 ' .00 30,481.97 69.4 4206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 7,540.00 .00 85.00 .00 7,455.00 1.1 4206-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T 3,600.00 157.80 429.16 .00 3,170.84 11.9 CONTRACT SERVICES 11,140.00 157.80 514.16 .00 10,625.84 4.6 4206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 43 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 6,500.00 202.49 1,776.24 .00 4,723.76 27.3 4206-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 2,995.00 19.39 1,096.11 .00 1,898.89 36.6 4206-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,903.00 434.36 1,052.30 .00 850.70 55.3 4206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 11,190.00 933.00 9,330.00 .00 1,860.00 83.4 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 22,588.00 1,589.24 13,254.65 .00 9,333.35 58.7 EQUIPMENT SERVICE 133,225.00 8,731.72 82,783.84 .00 50,441.16 62.1 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,155.00 51.43 647.07 .00 507.93 56.0 4601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 827.00 240.89 460.22 .00 366.78 55.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,982.00 292.32 1,107.29 .00 874.71 55.9 4601-4900 DEPRECIATION 4601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 2,950.00 .00 .00 .00 2,950.00 0.0 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4,932.00 292.32 1,107.29 .00 3,824.71 22.5 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 83,000.00 .00 .00 .00 83,000.00 0.0 8625 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS 8625-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8625-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 150,000.00 .00 .00 .00 150,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,232,868.00 17,656.69 622,226.59 2,215.36 608,426.05 50.6 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,232,868.00 17,656.69 622,226.59 2,215.36 608,426.05 50.6 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 44 ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND EXPENDITURE CONTROL 25,124,133.00 1,426,757.41 15,399,495.36 342,630.65 9,382,006.99 62.7 GRAND TOTALS 25,124,133.00 1,426,757.41 15,399,495.36 342,630.65 9,382,006.99 62.7 EXPPRIN2 05/20/98 12:41:04 DESCRIPTION • s CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 45 EXPENDITURE RECAP REPORT APRIL 1998 (083.3% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED APRIL 1997-98 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 001 GENERAL FUND 13,142,992.00 1,038,762.12 9,962,917.50 38,925.46 3,141,149.04 76.1 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 534,276.00 38,706.61 413,413.93 1,941.14 118,920.93 77.7 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 172,162.00 44,743.90 156,480.01 748.95 14,933.04 91.3 110 PARKING FUND 1,928,786.00 148,021.20 1,562,406.68 965.17 365,414.15 81.1 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 341,003.00 28,415.67 284,165.06 .00 56,837.94 83.3 117 AB939 FUND 59,851.00 11,634.88 25,689.88 .00 34,161.12 42.9 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 60,798.00 .00 10.66 .00 60,787.34 0.0 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 1,517,164.00 15,039.01 296,337.60 233,144.92 987,681.48 34.9 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 4,293.00 .00 4,124.07 .00 168.93 96.1 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 840,579.00 11,432.93 39,346.99 13,761.61 787,470.40 6.3 , 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 133,836.00 .00 5,996.66 12,382.50 115,456.84 13.7 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 385,529.00 344.06 15,622.55 .00 369,906.45 4.1 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 288,207.00 3,476.49 124,267.52 252.00 163,687.48 43.2 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 30,123.00 .00 63.72 .00 30,059.28 0.2 150 GRANTS FUND 1,250,744.00 .00 60,743.28 .00 1,190,000.72 4.9 151 OFC OF TRAFFIC SFTY GRANT FUND 3,548.00 .00 2,589.22 .00 958.78 73.0 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 25,103.00 2,031.67 20,178.51 .00 4,924.49 80.4 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 46,749.00 10,964.74 22,247.10 5,903.28 18,598.62 60.2 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 1.00 .00 .05 .00 .95 5.0 160 SEWER FUND 1,452,945.00 3,097.65 593,835.17 32,390.26 826,719.57 43.1 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 153,255.00 .00 1,407.09 .00 151,847.91 0.9 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 76,442.00 4,040.75 54,340.02 .00 22,101.98 71.1 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 400,103.00 5,000.00 261,004.23 .00 139,098.77 65.2 306 LOMA/MYRTLE UNDRGRND DISTRICT 40,000.00 2,150.00 15,125.00 .00 24,875.00 37.8 705 INSURANCE FUND 1,002,776.00 41,239.04 854,956.27 .00 147,819.73 85.3 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,232,868.00 17,656.69 622,226.59 2,215.36 608,426.05 50.6 GRAND TOTALS 25,124,133.00 1,426,757.41 15,399,495.36 342,630.65 9,382,006.99 62.7 TREASURER'S REPORT - IL 1998 FUND GENERAL NUMBER ACCOUNT 4/1/98 4/30/98 BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENT CHECKS ADJUSTMENT BALANCE 001 GENERAL $3,106,667.85 51,880,194.09 5144,427.23 (5828,588.38) 0260,271.91) $4,042,428.88 105 LIGH11NG/LANDSCAPING 5618,456.78 $109,269.63 57,067.14 (531,180.12) ($7,846.17) 5695,767.26 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 5330,716.82 526,576.55 53,47724 (86,587.43) (538,155.87) 5316,027.31 110 PARKING 598,111.78 5169,399.96 514,03923 ($80,404.84) ($85,626.76) 5115,519.37 115 STATE GAS TAX 567,211.00 524,299.25 5704.11 (528,415.67) 563,798.69 117 AB939 5163,860.48 51,763.53 (51,37921) (5237.81) $164,006.99 119 COMP ABSENCES $573,549.81 $573,549.81 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 578,673.09 5850.35 579,523.44 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE 5211,067.85 (513.608.68) 01,430.33) 5196,028.84 125 PARK REC FAC TAX 5242,877.46 536,074.00 52,820.79 $281,772.25 126 RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY $1,524,807.47 519,353.35 (5386.35) (513,996.11) $1,529,778.36 127 BUILDING IMPROVMENT FUND 5150,262.93 51,624.88 $151,887.81 140 COMM DEVELOP. BLOCK GRANT ($2,479.01) ($382.71) (549.50) (52,911.22) 145 PROPOSITION A FUND 5120,746.51 517,945.60 51,384.40 (53,19626) (5239.96) 8136,64029 146 PROPOSITION C FUND 5551,590.49 517,027.00 $6,056.46 $574,673.95 150 GRANT FUND 5156,509.97 5156,509.97 151 TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT FUND $0.00 $0.00 152 AR QUALITY MGMT DISTRICT 512,302.72 5122.41 (518.81) (51,969.38) 510,436.94 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFOR SVC $38,82327 $57.41 5360.72 ($11,022.15) $28,21925 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT $4,29624 546.58 54,342.82 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 51,834,915.68 54,267.37 5141,555.74 ($45,981.59) 011,712.82) $1,923,044.38 170 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 5161,085.28 $1,741.87 5162.827.15 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND $223,173.17 513,975.00 52,466.57 ($4,040.75) $235,573.99 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 5152,327.47 51,620.55 (55,000.00) 5148,948.02 306 LOMA MYRTLE UNDERGROUND DIST 527,025.00 (51,800.00) ($350.00) 524,875.00 705 INSURANCE FUND 51,350,293.50 520,000.00 5140,403.73 (596,565.54) (51,153.21) 51,412,978.48 715 EQUIP.REPLACEMENT FUND 51,185,861.65 842,92124 (513,504.19) (54,540.17) 51,210,738.53 900 INVESTMENT FUND (529.94) 5108,355.17 (5108,32523) $0.00 512,982,705.32 52,427,441.03 5534,808.12 01,139,60626) (5568,361.65) 514,236,986.56 TRUST BALANCE BALANCE ACCOUNTS 4/1/98 DEPOSITS CHARGES 4/30/98 PAYROLL 53,000.00 5703,439.40 5703,439.40 53,000.00 BANK BALANCE CABLE TV DEPOSIT 510,000.00 510,000.00 GENERAL 5329,288.67 TRUST ACCTS 518,951.76 514,095,697.80 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $463,882.83 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $348,240.43 OUTSTANDING CHECKS 5193,951.67 5154,288.76 INACTIVE DEPOSIT 514,095,697.80 BALANCE 514,249,986.56 1d�, • • MAY 21, 1998 Honorable Mayor City Council Meeting and Members of the City Council of MAY 28, 1998 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of April 1998. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, NOTED: Stephen R. City Manag NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland Finance Director 1 dc,, 41 INSTITUTION LAIF • INVESTMENT REPORT - • APRIL 1998 DATE OF DATE OF ASKING MARKET TOTAL INVESTMENTS MATURITY PRICE VALUE 4/1/98 $8,693,469.68 Interest $108,355.17 $1,300,000.00 4/30/98 $10,101,824.85 CORPORATE NOTES: Investment U.S. TREASURY BONDS/NOTES: INTEREST 5.700% $501,16523 12/11/97 9/15/00 $501,190.00 $502,860.00 6.250% Investment $499,498.49 5/6/96 8/15/98 $498,164.06 $500,705.00 Investment $496,798.45 9/12/96 11/15/98 $492,03125 $500,080.00 5.870% 5.500% U.S. GOV'T AGENCY BONDS/NOTES Federal Home Loan Bank $497,427.14 10/17/96 2/22/99 $494,725.00 $499,375.00 5.580% Federal National Mtg Assn $500,000.00 6/3/97 6/3/99 $500,000.00 $503,650.00 6260% Federal Home Loan Bank $499,167.09 8/1/97 7/28/00 4499,050.00 $501,015.00 6.080% U.S. GOV'T AGCY -STATE TAX EXEMPT S.L.MA $500,000.00 Federal Home Loan Bk $499,816.55 INVESTMENT TOTAL $14,095,697.80 aaasaa- --- 12/30/96 12/30/98 $500,000.00 $500,545.00 3/19/97 2/12/99 $499,687.50 $501,720.00 5.730% 6.070% $3,984,847.81 $4,009,950.00 5.920% In compliance with the Califomia Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted Investment policy. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, May 18, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 28, 1998 HERMOSA SUNSET CONCERTS ON THE BEACH EVENT CONTRACT AND PROGRAM OUTLINE Recommendation Staff recommends that Council: 1. Approve the attached event contract between the City and Hawthorne Savings to present three free community concerts on the beach: July 12, 19, and 26 from 6 p.m. — dusk (Attachment A). 2. Approve the program outline. Background Mayor Edgerton requested that staff examine the possibility of presenting community concerts on the beach for the 1998 summer season. At the February 10, 1998 meeting, Council approved Sunset Concerts on the beach. In order to provide necessary funding and event operations, Hawthorne Savings was approved as the presenting sponsor for the three concert series. To that end, staff was directed to return an event contract and program outline prior to the scheduled concerts. Analysis Hawthorne Savings and staff worked together to develop the Sunset Concerts program. The budget was developed with a donation from Hawthorne Savings and through sponsorship solicitation by Makai Events (working for Hawthorne Savings). To date, at least $25,000 in donations has been committed to subsidize the three concerts. Hawthorne Savings has also secured Stonebridge Productions as the operations firm who will produce the free beach concerts to include: (a) staging, (b) sound equipment, (c) performers, and (c) operations personnel. The City has prior experience with Stonebridge Productions who successfully staged a beach concert in June of 1996. The concerts will be presented on the South side of the Pier in order to accommodate other City programs and because the logistics are easier there. Sponsor booths may be le • • erected on the north side and/or on the base of the Pier in order to increase their visibility from the Plaza. Each concert will focus on a theme to include: 1. July 12: Blast from the past featuring the "Coasters." 2. July 19: Cajun, Zydeco and Rhythm & Blues featuring "Mumbo Gumbo." 3. July 26: Surf music featuring Nokie Edwards (lead guitarist from the Ventures) and the Chantey's (Pipeline). Hawthorne Savings has agreed to provide programs for kids from 5:00 — 6:00 PM each evening to include a variety of performers, games and activities (e.g., face painting, games, performers) as a warm-up before the concerts. With the assistance of Hawthorne Savings and other event sponsors, the City will be able to present community concerts at a minimal cost to the City. If they are successful, Sunset Concerts will be a welcome addition to the City's recreational offerings for many summers to come. FISCAL IMPACT: $800 from the General Fund for Community Resources staffing costs. Attachment A. Event Contract Respectfully submitted, AM' MaC. Rootey Director of Community Resources Concur: Stephe • urrell City Manager Val Straser Chief of Police Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance • fiEg- i S_1 • • i HAWTHORNE SAVINGS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on May 28, 1998, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between HAWTHORNE SAVINGS (HS) and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY) with regards to the SUNSET CONCERTS ON THE BEACH on JULY 12, JULY 19, AND JULY 26, 1998. FEES As the presenting sponsor for Hermosa Sunset Concerts on the Beach, Hawthorne Savings will be responsible for the funding and operation of three beach concerts scheduled for July 12, 19 and 26, 1998. Funding will include costs for presenting each concert and to pay for any extraordinary CITY services required for the events such as Police overtime. All unanticipated costs incurred by CITY on behalf of the concert shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from CITY. LOCATION o On Beach, South of the Pier o Concert operations and staging are subject to change SECURITY HS shall provide no less than two (2) security officers. Said Officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other concert staff. A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the concert for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of CITY'S alcohol ordinance. CITY shall provide Officers for the event as follows: One (1) from 6:00 p.m. to Sunset, or as many Officers as deemed necessary by the Chief of Police. CITY shall provide firefighters as deemed necessary by the Fire Chief. HS shall assume cost of Officers and Fire/Paramedic personnel. CLEAN-UP HS shall provide additional trash receptacles (if necessary) at the following locations: • Beach (impacted area) HS shall take necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. HS shall arrange for such bins. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES CITY shall make any necessary contacts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. HS shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of concert if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. 1 • • If HS desires any County services, they must process their request through CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by HS. INSURANCE At least ten (10) days prior to the event, HS shall provide CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming CITY, and County of Los Angeles, their officers, employees and agents as additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 days notice in writing to CITY and County. HS insurers shall be primarily responsible for all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. For insurance purposes, the event area shall be defined to include all areas occupied or affected by the event. HS agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of HS, its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. CO-SPONSORS HS may solicit co-sponsors for the event who will assist with funding and promotions. Co-sponsors will be permitted one display booth each and signage on the beach on each concert date as approved by the City. ADVERTISING HS shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of CITY'S alcoholic beverage ordinance if deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. Signage regarding CITY'S alcohol ordinance shall be required by HS. CITY staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for postings. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by HS to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of HS. CITY shall permit two street banners to be posted for concert. CITY will waive banner fees. CITY shall permit HS to display up to six (6) large replicas of products. CITY staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. PARKING HS shall be required to post temporary "No Parking" signs 24-72 hours in advance of event (as directed by CITY), and be responsible for the removal of signs on final event day. HS shall use plastic cable ties to secure the signs. At no time may HS block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS CITY shall review all requests for any special events to be held as part of the concert. CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY CITY shall allow HS the opportunity to sell official HS concert concession items pursuant to certain conditions: • No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted on the Beach or in the Pier Plaza area, • All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. 2 • • • CITY will include logo identification for Hawthorne Savings in the summer recreation brochure (distribution June 1998) and will permit Hawthorne Savings advertising display space on the beach on each concert date. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF HS HS shall be responsible to obtain all necessary County and State health permits as required. Event shall be conducted in compliance with CITY Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. HS will be solely responsible for event management. HS shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. HS shall maintain public access openings on the Strand Wall (Pier). HS will abide by any additional policies or appropriate fees as established by CITY. HS shall be responsible for all artists fees, licensing fees, equipment, sound system, and personnel necessary for conducting said concert. HS shall set up/tear down between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on scheduled days. CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AMEND AND/OR TERMINATE THIS CONTRACT AT ANY TIME. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date HAWTHORNE SAVINGS Director of Operations Date ATTEST City Clerk Date 3 • • ACTION SHEET AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS May 19, 1998 7:00 P.M. Peter Tucker Chairperson Rod Merl Vice Chairperson Sam Perrotti Ron Pizer Carol Schwartz The Public Comment Is Limited to Three Minutes Per Speaker 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call COMMS. SCHWARTZ WAS ABSENT. Section I Consent Calendar Any Planning Commissioner or public wishing to pull an item from below may request to do so at this time. 3. Approval of April 21, 1998 minutes ACTION: APPROVED (4-0). 4. Resolution(s) for adoption a) Resolution P.C. 98-15 amending the General Plan from Commercial Corridor to Medium Density residential and a Zone Change from Specific Plan Area No. 7 to R-2 and adoption of a Mitigated Environmental Negative Declaration for the property located on the rear portion of two commercial parcels fronting on Pacific Coast Highway (635 and 705 Pacific Coast Highway). b) Resolution P.C. 98-16 approving a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #52508 for an eight (8) -unit condominium project, and to resubdivide the existing lots, and adoption of a Mitigated Environmental Negative Declaration at 635 and 705 Pacific Coast Highway. c) Resolution P.C. 98-17 approving a Precise Development Plan to reconfigure the layout and increase the commercial frontage of an existing lumber yard site at 635 and 705 Pacific Coast Highway. d) Resolution P.C. 98-18 approving a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel map #24974 for a two (2) -unit condominium project, at 650-652 10th Street. 1 I.E • • e) Resolution P.C. 98-19 approving a Variance from minimum required garage depth (17'4" rather than 18' for existing garages) and approving a request to allow the expansion and remodel of an existing single-family dwelling with nonconforming side and front yards resulting in a greater than 50% increase in valuation at 225 34th Street. f) Resolution P.C. 98-20 approving a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #21493 for a two (2) -unit condominium project at 840 15th Street. g) Resolution P.C. 98-21 approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor dining in conjunction with a coffee house and laundromat at 509 Pier Avenue. h) Resolution P.C. 98-22 approving a remodel and expansion of 199 square feet to an existing nonconforming building and use at 1157 6th Street. i) Resolution P.C. 98-23 approving a greater than 50% expansion and remodel to an existing single-family dwelling while maintaining nonconforming setbacks at 2705 Palm Drive. ACTION: APPROVED (4-0). 5. Item(s) for consideration NONE Section II Oral / Written Communications 6. Anyone wishing to address the Commission regarding a matter not related to a public hearing on the agenda may do so at this time. NONE. Section III Public Hearing(s) 7. PDP 97-25 -- Precise Development Plan to redesign mobile home park to accommodate larger units at 531 Pier Ave. (continued from January 20, February 17, March 17 and April 21, 1998 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: To be continued at applicant's request to the June 16, 1998 meeting. ACTION: CONTINUED TO 6/16/98 MEETING (4-0). 8. PARK 98-2 -- Parking Plan to allow the shared use of the existing required parking for off-site businesses at 200 Pier Avenue (continued from March 17 and April 21, 1998 meetings). Staff Recommended Action: To be continued at applicant's request to the June 16, 1998 meeting. ACTION: CONTINUED TO 6/16/98 MEETING (4-0). 9. PDP 98-6 -- Precise Development Plan to convert an existing single family dwelling to a duplex and to add 534 square feet at 1734 Prospect Avenue. (continued from April 21, 1998 meeting). Staff Recommended Action: To be continued to the June 16, 1998 meeting. ACTION: CONTINUED TO 6/16/98 MEETING (4-0). 10. CUP 98-3 -- Conditional Use Permit amendment to change the allowed operating hours in City encroachment area (patio) from 7 a.m. - 9 p.m. daily to 7 a.m. - 10 p.m. Sundays - Thursdays 2 • • and 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. Fridays and Saturdays, and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 837 Hermosa Avenue, Fat Face Fenner's Falloon. Staff Recommended Action: To approve applicant's request. ACTION: APPROVED WITH MODIFICATION OF NO WALL ON EAST (4-0). 11. CUP 98-1 -- Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan Amendment modifying the phasing of certain off-site improvements for the Beach House Hotel located at 1300 the Strand. Staff Recommended Action: To approve applicant's request and direct staff as deemed appropriate. ACTION: 1) APPROVED MODIFICATIONS SUBJECT TO CONSISTENCY WITH CC&R'S. 2) APPROVED MODIFYING THE PHASING OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS (4-0). 12. CUP 98-5 / PDP 98-5 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25053 for a two -unit condominium at 1427 Manhattan Avenue. Staff Recommended Action: To approve applicant's request. ACTION: APPROVED WITH MODIFICATIONS (4-0). 13. CUP 98-8 / PDP 98-9 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25093 for a two -unit condominium at 1646 Loma Drive. Staff Recommended Action: To approve applicant's request. ACTION: APPROVED WITH MODIFICATIONS (4-0). 14. CUP 98-9 / PDP 98-10 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #24988 for a two -unit condominium at 654 7th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To approve applicant's request. ACTION: APPROVED WITH MODIFICATIONS (4-0). 15. PDP 98-11 -- Precise Development Plan to allow two detached dwelling units at 615 11th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To approve applicant's request. ACTION: APPROVED (WITH MODIFICATIONS (4-0). 16. CUP 98-7 / PDP 98-8 -- Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #25094 for a two -unit condominium at 850 7th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To approve applicant's request. ACTION: APPROVED WITH MODIFICATIONS (4-0). COMM. PERROTTI LEFT MEETING DUE TO ILLNESS AT 9:45 P.M. Section IV Hearing(s) 17. NR 98-5 -- Nonconforming Remodel for an expansion/remodel to an existing single family dwelling with a nonconforming garage setback resulting in a greater than 50% increase in valuation at 1278 8th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To approve applicant's request. ACTION: APPROVED (3-0). 3 • • 18. NR 98-6 -- Nonconforming Remodel for 220 square foot expansion to an existing nonconforming use duplex with one (1) parking space per unit at 37 9th Street. Staff Recommended Action: To approve applicant's request. ACTION: APPROVED WITH MODIFICATIONS (3-0). Section V 19. Staff Items a. Memorandum regarding code interpretation at 2530 The Strand. ACTION: DIRECTION BY MINUTE ORDER TO PERMIT ONLY 42" MAXIMUM HEIGHT WALL FOR RECONSTRUCTION (3-0). b. Interpretation of zoning requirements and conditions of approval for a three -unit condominium project at 1224 Loma Drive. ACTION: DIRECTION BY MINUTE ORDER APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL MODIFICATION AND SIDE YARD SETBACK (3-0). c. Community Development Department Activity Report of March, 1998. d. Tentative future Planning Commission agenda. e. City Council Minutes of April 14 and 28, 1998. ACTION: RECEIVED AND FILED THE ABOVE (3-0). 20. Commissioner Items 21. Adjournment 4 • • May 20, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 1998 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY/16th STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL REQUEST Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council accept and file the April 17, 1998, Caltrans report relative to the subject location. It is further recommended that the City Council authorize the City Traffic Engineer to request Caltrans' consideration of higher visibility crosswalks using state of the art technology at this location. Background: In August 1997 Ms. Betty Medina requested Caltrans to investigate said location for a possible traffic signal. In February 1998, the City's Public Works Director further requested a study of said location due to a "growing concern for the safety of pedestrian users crossing Pacific Coast Highway (PCH)." Caltrans completed their studies and reported on same in the April 17, 1998. The report is on file in the office of the Directors of Public Works. In essence, Caltrans has once again found that a traffic signal for the subject location is not warranted. The study is based on lack of meeting any of the recognized signal warrants. Analysis: The study was conducted in a professional manner and did address all of the nationally recognized warrants for signal installation. The motor vehicle volume and pedestrian volume coming from 16th Street and crossing PCH is not sufficient to warrant a signal. Caltrans does acknowledge that the Hermosa Pavillion, the shopping center and the theaters failed to realize their traffic generation potential. In our opinion, should this condition change, there would be sufficient cross street volume to warrant a signal. The accident history has been less than the statewide average and has been low considering the crossing volume. This is in part due to the advance pedestrian crossing signing and pavement markings and the left turn prohibitions from 16th Street during peak periods. However, we still have a concern for the safety of pedestrians crossing this high volume, high speed, wide, roadway. There are state of the art, proactive approaches to pedestrian protection that includes strategies to enhance the crosswalk striping, signing and lighting at uncontrolled crosswalks. • • Attached is a summary of a strategy that has been successfully tested in several cities; The strategy testing has been given the blessing of the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) and is currently in use in the California cities mentioned. Note that the "in pavement warning lights" warn approaching motorists of pedestrians crossing the street within the marked crosswalks. The lights are not continuously flashing. They flash only when a pedestrian enters the crosswalk. At some installations pedestrian push buttons activate the lights. It is our professional opinion that this strategy should be seriously considered by Caltrans for the PCH/16`h Street location. This was not addressed by Caltrans in their warrant report. Lastly, the California Traffic Control Device Committee (CTCDS) recommended that Caltrans develop standard specifications for the device and adopt the system as a standard traffic control device. Fiscal Impact: Caltrans or the Office of Traffic Safety could fund said project as a research project. The City should consider a contribution to said installation or in kind service to evaluate said installation when implemented. Cost to provide equipment and installation for the system is approximately $20,000 for a four lane street. In comparison, the cost for an overhead flashing beacon at the crossing of a four lane street is between $10,000 and $30,000. No data is available for a six lane street. Attachments Respectfully submitted, Not available for signature J,ti.tdC, UI�,CC Edward Ruzak /Harold C. Williams, P.E. City Traffic Engineer Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director srl. fb95.pwfiles.ccitems.pchsig Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Stephen R. Bu r'11 City Manager • • May 18, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 1998 SUBJECT: REQUEST TO REMOVE COVENANT PROHIBITING SALE OF LOTS SEPARATELY LOCATION: 514-518 Pier Ave./1184 Cypress APPLICANT: Hanson and Talma Williams Property Owners Request: To authorize release from a deed recorded covenant as specified in attached document, so that the subject parcels, addresses noted above, may be sold separately. Staff Recommendation By minute order authorize release from the subject covenant and direct staff to execute the attached covenant superseding original covenant. Background The subject site consists of four lots (See attached map). In 1968, the City required the property owners of the subject property Assessor parcels, 32, 15, and 21, Book 8187, page 20 to maintain ownership by way of a covenant recorded with the deed, as a means to secure the required parking for the existing development at 514-18 Pier Avenue on the 1184 Cypress Avenue property. In 1984, the property at 1184 Cypress Avenue was redeveloped with 3 apartment units. All required parking for the apartment was provided and the commercial property was fully parked.. Analysis The owner's representative, Shorewood Realtors, has requested that the City authorize release of the parking covenant in order to sell separately the residential lot (1184 Cypress). The current businesses, a karate studio, and cleaners at 514-18 Pier Avenue are now the sole users of the on-site parking and the parking that previously existed 1184 Cypress Avenue is therefore no longer required. Concur J1►s- f Sol Blumenfe 1, rector Community D velopment Department Stephen ' ,�:;' :'T3i , City Manager 9 covenant Michael Schu ch, City Planner Attachments 1. Letter requesting release from covenant. 2. Existing recorded Covenant 3. Map of subject property 4. Covenant release (To be provided to City Attorney) 04/01/98 WED 11:19 FAA alb ou4 U1JJ Recording requested by and mall to; ice. arson A, Wi,111amr1 Jz, Name 3924 V!,* Nivel Palos Verdes Estates, CAltfornia __• (Address) • RECORI+WD IN OFFICIAL RECORDS 0! LOS ANCrL35 COUNTY, CALIF. 141= 9 PM.JAN1161968 RAY E. LEC, County Recordhr • Space above this line for Recorder COVENANT ANO AGREEMENT TO HOLD TWO OR MORE LOTS AS ONE PARCEL UN E_ 0 E OWNERSHl P;� (are) the owner of rhe hereinafter real property, and that I we am (are) the possessor of a trust deed (s) saidyreal property described as follows: (1) (3) (4) SE 44' of SW 40' of lot 12, Tract 780 NE 30' of SW 40' of NW 90' of lot 12, Tract 780 SW 101 of,NW 90' of lot. 12 end NE 29.3' of NW 90' of lot 13, Tract 78o SE 44' of lot 13, Tract 780 on which'' property is located at Elnd known a (1) (1) and ,(3) ✓ 8 Pier Avenue 1 S . and\or•the .purpose of a commercial building, located on (1) (2) and (3) at 518 Pier Avene,'and parking forsaid commercial building to be located on (4) the SE 44' of 1ot*13, Tract 780. Further provided that the SE 44' of lot 13, Tract 780, will serve as i'fligress and egress for seld.conmerclai building. As r gulated by the'City of Hermosa Beach Zoning,Ordinenee: No. N.S. 154, Section 1157, pertaining to parking requirements, we do hereby premise, covenant and agree to and with seid City of Hermosa Beach, a munlcipel corporation, thatthe above legally descr1bed land she! be held as one' parcel, under one ownership and no portion shall be sold. Separately. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon ourselves, and future owners, encumbrancers, their successors, heirs, assignees and shall continue in effect unci ;.such time that the City of Hermosa Beech Zoning Ordinance unconditionally permits the use ti! purpose herein above referred to or unless otherwise released by authority of the City l Hermosa Beech, California. FEE $2 ated; This 15th day of January 19 68' (S 1 9n) (Sign) STAT OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNT OF LOS ANGELES ) On this 15th day of _ January__ 19 68 , before me, the undersigned, e Noiiiry Public in and for the said County, duly commiss'i'oned, personally appeared i; lileneon A. Williams, Jr, and'Telma Lou W Mame 4 I, to be arsons whose name know .ito me the, p ( ) h e (x ) Is, (are) subscribed inat}1lment, end'acknowiedged to me that he (they) executed same_ • WIN E. 5 my hand and official seal: (Notary seal) ....V.YY1�„N..rrr,.V BETTE LASHER NOTARY PueuC 040Foomt, . PRINCIPAL orr,cc IN ' LAC ANnri t'C rw,u*v . to the foregoing Notary Public in•and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California BE1TE LASHER-Notary Public ;.. I. ROH. E1P. SEPT, 6.1!11 • la; Muth cu. vIINIUM :EL MAP MINIUM EL MAP CONDOMINIUM P. M.223-84-85 PARCEL MAP RM. 244-83-84 R M. 241 - 38 SECOND .ADDITION: ?O HERMOSA BEACH M.B. 3-1! 3 TRACT .Na 780 _ _ M. 8, 16 - • • SHOREWOOD REALTORS IR.AJJUUCT CIHIFIABRIA May 6, 1998 Sol Blumenfeld City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: 514-518 Pier Avenue/1184 Cypress Street Dear Sol: Enclosed is a copy of a covenant issued for the above referenced properties.. The owners (Hanson and Talma Williams) are the same for all the properties. The owners are in escrow to sell the Pier Avenue properties (scheduled to close escrow at the end of this month) however, the covenant ties the three properties together and we need to have it removed as the sellers are not selling the Cypress property. In speaking with Mike Schubach from the City of Hermosa Beach, it is his understanding that the properties were once tied into one another for parking purposes. However, since Cypress was developed in 1984/85 he felt that it would have complied with the parking requirements at that time and didn't see a need to maintain this covenant. Therefore, with your assistance, we would greatly appreciate any and all guidance and direction on how to remove this covenant, as this is the first time Mike or I have had this requested of us. Mike felt that you would be the most likely candidate for this request. The owners can be reached at (805) 822-1185 and their new address is 28301 Hidden Oaks Drive, Tehachapi, CA 93561. I can be reached at (310) 379-2167 x 240. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. enclosure 500 S. SEPuwEngt.5cu EvARp, Surra= 303. M -tam'N &.&CH, CAUFORNIA 90266 • (310) 379-2167 Exr. 204 • (310) 798-3122 not (1 m = Q; ► City of 2iermosa 1r3. eackv • Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach CITY CLE?i< California 90254-3885 -44 • • May 19, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 1998 SUBJECTS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-1 ZONE CHANGE 98-1 ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION LOCATION: 635 & 705 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY APPLICANT: MICHAEL LEARNED ET AL & JCC HOMES REQUESTS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM CC (COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR) TO MD (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), AND ZONE CHANGE FROM SPAT (SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) Planning Commission Recommendation To approve the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Staff Recommendation Based upon previous City Council action on a recent similar Zone Change and General Plan Amendment request, deny the request. Site Information GENERAL PLAN: Commercial Corridor ZONING: C-3 SITE AREA: 90,531 Square Feet EXISTING USES AND AREA (in Sq. Ft.): 705 P.C.H.:Vacated Comm./Res. Building and Motel (37,160) 635 P.C.H: Lumber Yard (53, 371) PROPOSED LOT SIZES (in Sq. Ft.) Commercial Lot 43,573 Residential Lot 30,759 The subject site is located onthe west side of Pacific Coast Highway between 6th Street and 8th Street. The existing commercial lot depths are 290 feet, and the rear lot lines are coterminous with the General Plan/Zoning boundary lines separating commercial from residential (As a result of previous land use designation changes in 1989 with respect to the P.C.H. Multi -Use Corridor). The Lumber Yard has been in operation at this location since the 1920's, and the Motel/Commercial building was constructed in the 1940's. Background At their meeting of April 21, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change by a vote of 3:0. The Planning Commission also approved a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map #52508 for an 8 unit condominium project taking access from 7th Street and a Precise Development Plan to reconfigure the layout and increase the P.C.H. frontage of the existing lumber yard. The approval of these entitlements are contingent upon City Council approval of the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change. The only action under consideration by the City Council is the Zone Change and General Plan Amendment. 1 4 • • The Planning Commission reconunendation for the Zone Change and General Plan Amendment was supported by the findings contained in attached P.C. Resolution 98-15, summarized as follows: • Current market conditions which have not supported or created an interest in commercial development at this location at the existing depth, and the change will allow the development of a more appropriate residential land use on the rear portion, while continuing to facilitate commercial development consistent with the Commercial Corridor on the front part of the properties. • The subject property to be redesignated is appropriate for residential use as it is abutted by residential uses to the north; located in an area which is predominantly residential in character; more compatible to surrounding residential uses than a potentially more intensive commercial use; and, will provide property tax benefits while not unduly straining city services. • The changes will allow for vacant and underdeveloped property to be placed in more productive use which will further eliminate a dangerous and substandard condition. The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of March 12, recommended a Mitigated Negative Declaration, finding that that all potentially significant environmental impacts could be mitigated to less than significant levels. Analysis The City Council previously denied a similar General Plan Amendment/Zone Change for the same property in conjunction with a proposed 24 -unit condominium development which included additional property fronting on 6th Street. The denial was based upon a finding that it is desirable to maximize the commercial lot depth along the Pacific Coast Highway corridor. Based upon this previous action by City Council, staff is recommending denial of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONE CHANGE POLICY ISSUES The proposal involves a major land use decision regarding the redesignation and rezoning of the rear portion of the subject commercial lots for residential use, thereby significantly reducing potential commercial development. Under the revised land use changes, commercial interest in reinvestment for this block may be reduced, as the commercial lot depth would preclude major highway oriented development. The remaining commercial properties would have a depth of 170 feet. The City Council previously noted that the proposed rezoning could have implications for reinvestment for the entire commercial corridor as this is one of the few remaining parcels on Pacific Coast Highway with a nearly 300 foot depth. Redesignation of the property could preclude certain commercial developers from locating projects along this segment of P.C.H. Potential commercial projects that would require maintenance of the existing depth are larger retail development and hotel /motel uses. The City has received preliminary inquiries regarding hotel/motel development reflecting increased demand for these uses generally. A developer associated with Fairfield Suites (a division of Marriot), has recently expressed interest in the property at 705 Pacific Coast Highway for a small hotel. The existing depth of the commercial designation (Commercial Corridor) and the zoning (S.P.A. 7) are based on land use/zoning designations that date back to 1956 when the City's first Zoning Ordinance was adopted, 2 1 i prior to that the designations on City "Land Use Maps" only provided for a commercial depth of 100 -feet deep. More recently, when General Plan and zoning designations along large sections of P.C.H. were examined, the deeper 290 -foot commercial depths were maintained and reconfirmed for the subject parcels and redesignated to Commercial Corridor and S.P.A. 7 from a "Multi -Use Corridor" designation (1989 Multi -Use Corridor Study). This decision was consistent with the stated objectives of the study to maximize commercial potential. The specific factors that applied to the subject locations were both the extent of existing commercial development (the lumber yard) and the depth of the commercial development to the south which is also 290 feet. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report, and project plans for further background information on the proposed 8 -unit condominium project and the reconfiguration of the Lumber Yard. CONCUR: Sol Blumenfe Community erector evelopment Department Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager Attachments 1. 'Alternative Resolutions 2. Area Map / Zoning and General Plan Maps 3. Planning Commission Resolutions, Minutes, Stff Report, Exhibits 4. Staff Environmental Review Committee Notes/Checklist 5. Written Correspondence p 3 Ken Robertson Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 DRAFT - for approval of General Plan Amendment and Zone Change ORDINANCE NO. 98 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TILE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN MAP FROM CC (COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR) TO MD (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND AMEND THE ZONING MAP FROM SPAT (SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE REAR PORTION OF TWO COMMERCIAL PARCELS FRONTING ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (635 AND 705 P.C.H.) AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY 120 FEET OF LOTS 27 & 28, BLOCK 78, 2ND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was jointly filed by JCC Homes and Michael Learned et al, owners in escrow, and owners of real property located at 635 & 705 Pacific Coast Highway seeking approval of a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for the rear 120 feet of 635 and 705 Pacific Coast Highway; Section 2. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on April 21, 1998, at which the Commission heard and considered written and oral testimony regarding the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. In P.C. Resolution No. 98-15, the Commission recommended approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Section 3. By virtue of California Government Code Section 65356 the Planning Commission recommendation regarding the General Plan Amendment automatically goes to the City Council for its consideration. By virtue of California Government Code 65853 and Chapter 17.66 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code the Planning Commission recommendation regarding the Zone Change automatically goes to the City Council for its consideration. Section 4. The City Council conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on May 28, 1998, at which considerable testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Council. Section 5. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the City Council makes the following factual findings: 1. The requested changes will reduce the depth of the commercial designated property, as measured from P.C.H. westward, from 290 feet to 170 feet, and replacing the commercial designations on the rear 120 feet to allow residential development consistent with the Medium ct s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 I Density Residential classification of the General Plan and the R-2 Zoning district in the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The existing commercial property at 635 P.C.H. has been in continuing use as a retail lumber yard since the 1920's and contains a retail building supply hardware store and several lumber stacks, and employee and customer parking on the properties that front on 6th Street. The property at 705 P.C.H. contains commercial buildings on the front portion and is largely vacant on the rear portion. The commercial buildings are currently vacated due to non- compliance with the City's Seismic Strengthening Ordinance, and were most recently used commercially for a motel and restaurant and retail commercial uses. 3. The subject properties have been designated for commercial use to the full depth of 290 feet since the adoption of the City's first Zoning Ordinance in 1956. 4. The adjacent property to the north is designated on the General Plan and Zoning Maps for commercial purposes to a depth of 120 feet, and to the south to a depth of 300 feet. 5. Surrounding residential property to the west is designated Medium Density Residential on the General Plan and Zoned R-2, which allows residential development up to a density of 24 units per acre, and is currently developed with a mix of single and multi -family uses in which the current density ranges from 15 - 24 units per acre. Section 6. Based on the foregoing factual findings, and the recommendation of the Planning Commission as set forth in P.C. Resolution 98-15, the City Council makes the following findings pertaining to the request General Plan Amendment and Zone Change 1. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will recognize current market conditions which have not supported or created an interest in commercial development at this location at the existing depth, and allow the development of a more appropriate residential land use on the rear portion, while continuing to facilitated commercial development consistent with the Commercial Corridor for the remaining commercial portion of the property. 2. The subject property to be redesignated is appropriate for residential use as it is abutted by residential uses to the north, and located in an area which is predominantly residential in character. A residential use of the subject properties will be more compatible to surrounding residential uses than a potentially more intensive commercial use. The redesignation to Medium Density Residential on the General Plan Map and R-2 on the Zoning Map will be consistent with designations to the west of the subject property, and will allow a density of residential uses in a range consistent with surrounding residential development. The residential use of the property will provide property tax benefits and will not unduly strain city services. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • 3. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will allow for vacant and underdeveloped property to be placed in more productive use which will further eliminate a dangerous and substandard condition. 4. The City Council concurs with the Planning Commission and the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their Environmental Assessment/Initial Study, that this project will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 7. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby ordains that the City Council amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan, and the City's Official Zoning Map as follows: 1. Amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan by changing the properties, as described below and shown on the attached map, from Commercial Corridor to Medium Density Residential, and amend the Zoning Map by changing the properties, as described below and shown on the attached map, from S.P.A. 7 to R-2 Two -Family Residential: 635 Pacific Coast Highway, legally described as the westerly 120 feet of a portion of lot 27, Block 78 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach, M.B. 3-11-12 705 Pacific Coast Highway, legally described as the westerly 120 feet of a portion of lot 28, Block 78, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach, M.B. 3-11-12 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of May by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY f:\b95\cd\cc\rs705(2) ,l9 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • DRAFT - for denial of General Plan Amendment and Zone Change RESOLUTION 98 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO DENY A REQUESTED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM CC (COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR) TO MD (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND ZONE CHANGE FROM SPAT (SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7) TO R-2 The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was jointly filed by JCC Homes and Michael Learned et al, owners in escrow, and owners of real property located at 635 & 705 Pacific Coast Highway seeking approval of a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for the rear 120 feet of 635 and 705 Pacific Coast Highway; Section 2. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on April 21, 1998, at which the Commission heard and considered written and oral testimony regarding the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. In P.C. Resolution No. 98-15, the Commission recommended approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Section 3. By virtue of California Government Code Section 65356 the Planning Commission recommendation regarding the General Plan Amendment automatically goes to the City Council for its consideration. By virtue of California Government Code 65853 and Chapter 17.66 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code the Planning Commission recommendation regarding the Zone Change automatically goes to the City Council for its consideration. Section 4. The City Council conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on May 28, 1998, at which considerable testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Council. Section 5. Based on the evidence received at the public hearing; the policies of the City as set forth in the General Plan; and the previous decision of the City Council to deny a similar request (Resolution 97- adopted on November 25th, 1997), the City Council makes the following fmdings on the proposed General Plan Amendment: 1. The proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, as expressed on the official Land Use Map, to reduce the depth of the Commercial Corridor designation from 290 feet to 170 feet, is not in the best interest of the City with respect to long-term land use and development of the Pacific Coast Highway Commercial Corridor. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • 2. The General Plan Map accurately depicts the appropriate commercial depth for long- term land use and development of the Pacific Coast Highway corridor at this segment of the corridor. 3. Reducing the potential depth for commercial development would preclude the opportunity for anchor retail uses to locate on the subject property, and will significantly reduce the already limited opportunities for anchor retail uses to locate along Pacific Coast Highway within the boundaries of Hermosa Beach. Section 6. Based on the foregoing findings, the City Council hereby denies the requested General Plan Amendment. Section 7. By virtue of the denial of the proposed General Plan Amendment, it would be contrary to State Law to approve the Zone Change because such a change it would render the Zoning designation inconsistent with the General Plan designation. Therefore, the Zone Change is hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of May by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California A'frEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY f: \b95\cd\cc\rs705 (2) • • BACKGROUND MATERIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • l P.C. RESOLUTION 98-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN FROM COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM SPECIFIC PLAN AREA #7 TO R-2 (TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE REAR PORTION OF TWO COMMERCIAL PARCELS FRONTING ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (635 AND 705 P.C.H.) AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY 120 FEET OF LOTS 27 & 28, BLOCK 78, 2ND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Michael Learned, et al, and J.C.C. Homes owners, and owners in escrow of real property at 635 and 705 Pacific Coast Highway seeking to amend the General Plan Map and Zoning Map. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the application for General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on April 21, 1998, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The requested changes will reduce the depth of the commercial designated property, as measured from P.C.H. westward, from 290 feet to 170 feet, and replacing the commercial designations on the rear 120 feet to allow residential development consistent with the Medium Density Residential classification of the General Plan and the R-2 Zoning district in the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The existing commercial property at 635 P.C.H. has been in continuing use as a retail lumber yard since the 1920's and contains a retail building supply hardware store and several lumber stacks, and employee and customer parking on the properties that front on 6th Street. The property at 705 P.C.H. contains commercial buildings on the front portion and is largely vacant on the rear portion. The commercial buildings are currently vacated due to non- compliance with the City's Seismic Strengthening Ordinance, and were most recently used commercially for a motel and restaurant and retail commercial uses. ,19 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • 3. The subject properties have been designated for commercial use to the full depth of 290 feet since the adoption of the City's first Zoning Ordinance in 1956. 4. The adjacent property to the north is designated on the General Plan and Zoning Maps for commercial purposes to a depth of 120 feet, and to the south to a depth of 300 feet. 5. Surrounding residential property to the west is designated Medium Density Residential on the General Plan and Zoned R-2, which allows residential development up to a density of 24 units per acre, and is currently developed with a mix of single and multi -family uses in which the current density ranges from 15 - 24 units per acre. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the request General Plan Amendment and Zone Change 1. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will recognize current market conditions which have not supported or created an interest in commercial development at this location at the existing depth, and allow the development of a more appropriate residential land use on the rear portion, while continuing to facilitated commercial development consistent with the Commercial Corridor for the remaining commercial portion of the property. 2. The subject property to be redesignated is appropriate for residential use as it is abutted by residential uses to the north, and located in an area which is predominantly residential in character. A residential use of the subject properties will be more compatible to surrounding residential uses than a potentially more intensive commercial use. The redesignation to Medium Density Residential on the General Plan Map and R-2 on the Zoning Map will be consistent with designations to the west of the subject property, and will allow a density of residential uses in a range consistent with surrounding residential development. The residential use of the property will provide property tax benefits and will not unduly strain city services. 3. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will allow for vacant and underdeveloped property to be placed in more productive use which will further eliminate a dangerous and substandard condition. 4. The Planning Commission concurs with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their Environmental Assessment/Initial Study, that this project will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 4. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan, and the City's Official Zoning Map as follows: 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • 1. Amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan by changing the properties, as described below and shown on the attached map, from Commercial Corridor to Medium Density Residential, and amend the Zoning Map by changing the properties, as described below and shown on the attached map, from S.P.A. 7 to R-2 Two -Family Residential: 635 Pacific Coast Highway, legally described as the westerly 120 feet of a portion of lot 27, Block 78 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach, M.B. 3-11-12 705 Pacific Coast Highway, legally described as the westerly 120 feet of a portion of lot 28, Block 78, 2nd Addition to Hermosa Beach, M.B. 3-11-12 VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Comm. Perrotti, Pizer, Chmn.Tucker None Comms. Schwartz, Merl None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 98-15 is a true and complete record of the action taken b the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular mee ' s g o Apri 1, 19 Peter Tucker, airman -t9 -9e Date pc/5-19-98/rszc705 at /1 • • P.C. RESOLUTION 98-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT #52508 FOR AN EIGHT (8) - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, AND TO RESUBDIVIDE THE EXISTING LOTS, AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 635 & 705 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOTS 27 & 28, BLOCK 78, 2ND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by J.C.C. Homes, owner in escrow of real property located at the rear 120 feet of 635 and 705 Pacific Coast, seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map #52508 for an Eight (8) Unit Condominium project. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the subject application on April 21, 1998, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing to resubdivide the existing properties into two parcels. Lot 1 is proposed for the rear 120 feet of the lots at 635 and 705 P.C.H. Proposed lot 2 would front on Pacific Coast Highway with a depth of 170 feet and is proposed to be used for commercial development. 2. The proposed lot 1, to be used for the condominium development contains 30,759 square feet, is under consideration for and being recommended for a General Plan Amendment to be redesignated to Medium Density Residential, and a Zone Change to R-2 Two -Family Residential, subject to final approval by the City Council. 3. If redesignated and rezoned, the property may be developed for up to 17 residential units pursuant to the density requirements of the R-2 zone. 4. The applicant proposed a development of eight (8) detached condominium units, accessed by a common driveway with access from 7th Street, with 4-5 bedroom units containing 3,000 square feet, two garage spaces and two guest parking spaces, and including a common open space area. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Tentative Tract Map. '1 9 1. The map is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans; /0— 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • 2. The site is proposed to be rezoned R-2 and is physically suitable for the type and density of proposed development; 3. The subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; 4. The subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; 5. Design of the proposed subdivision is compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City's General Plan, and is compatible with the immediate environment; 6. The project, as conditioned, will conform to all zoning and condominium criteria and will be compatible with neighboring residential properties; 7. The Planning Commission concurs with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their environmental assessment/initial study and the mitigation measures contained herein as Conditions of Approval, that this project will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a Negative Declaration. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the subject Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Tentative Tract contingent upon City Council approval of the pending General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for the subject property subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans received and reviewed by the Commission at their meeting of April 21, 1998, revised in accordance with the conditions below. Any minor modification shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. The final map shall be approved by the City Council and recorded with the County prior to the commencement of any demolition or new construction on the subject properties. 3. A perimeter wall around the entire project shall be provided and indicated on plans. 4. Decorative paving shall be provided on the common driveway and for each private driveway to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 5. Construction traffic shall be routed away from residential streets, and access the site directly from P.C.H., or from P.C.H. via 6th Street east of any residential uses, to the maximum extent feasible. The applicant shall submit a Construction Management Plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of Building Permits coordinated with the Construction Plan for the adjacent Condominium Project. (Required Hazard and Noise Mitigation Measure) 6. The project shall meet all requirements of the Condominium Ordinance. 13 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • a) Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions in compliance with the Condominium Ordinance shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits and shall include provisions for maintenance of the landscaping in the 5 -foot easement along the easterly property line. b) Proof of recordation of approved CC & R's shall be submitted to the Community Development Director six (6) months after recordation of the Final Map c) Requirements of Section 17.22.060(G) shall be shown on structural plans and reviewed at the time of Building Division plan check 7. There shall be compliance with all requirements of the Fire Department, including, but not limited to the provision of fire hydrants, and emergency access routes to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief. 8. There shall be compliance with all requirements of the Public Works Department including but not limited to providing necessary improvements and/or replacement to the 7th Street curb, and gutter. All required improvements in the public right-of- way shall be completed prior to the approval of the final map, or , alternatively, the applicant may provide surety in amount determined by the Director of Public Works Department to cover the cost of the improvement, to guarantee the completion of said improvement, in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney. A) The 7th Street curb and gutter shall be a Public Works Department approved rolled curb and gutter design and shall match the curb and gutter design for the private driveway serving the condominium project. 9. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted substantially consistent with the concept landscape plan reviewed at the April 21, 1998 Planning Commission meeting for approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of Building Permits, and shall include the following: a) An automatic landscape sprinkler system shall be provided, and shall be shown on plans. (building permits are required) 10. Architectural treatment shall be as shown on building elevations and site and floor plans incorporating the conditions below. Any modification shall require approval by the Community Development Director. a) Enhanced articulation shall be provided for the rear building elevations of each unit. b) The color of the roof tiles shall be varied. c) Precise building height shall be reviewed at the time of plan check, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 11. Any satellite dish antennas and/or similar equipment shall comply with the requirements of Section 17.46.240 of the Zoning Ordinance. 12. Conduit shall be installed in each unit for cable television. 13. The address of each condominium• unit shall be conspicuously displayed on the street./common driveway side of the building with externally or internally lit numbers and the method for illumination shall be shown on plans.. Addressing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 numbering and display subject to approval by the Community Development Department. 14. Two copies of final construction plans, including site, elevation and floor plans, which are consistent with the conditions of approval of this conditional use permit, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division for consistency with Planning Commission approved plans prior to the submittal of plans to the Building Division for Plan Check. 15. Prior to the submittal of construction plans to the Building Division for Plan Check an Acceptance of Conditions affidavit shall be filed with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department stating that the applicant/property owner is aware of, and agrees to accept, all of the conditions of this grant 16. The Conditional Use Permit, and Precise Development Plan shall be null and void eighteen months form the date of approval unless building permits have been obtained, and approval of the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map shall become null and void twenty-four months from the date of approval unless the map is finaled and the project implemented. The applicant may apply in writing for an extension of time to the Planning Commission prior to the dates of expiration. 17. Prior to issuance of a building permit, abutting property owners and residents within 100 feet shall be notified of the anticipated date for commencement of construction. a. The form of the notification shall be provided by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. b. Building permits will not be issued until the applicant provides an affidavit certifying mailing of the notice. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Comm. Pizer, Chmn.Tucker Comm. Perrotti Comms. Schwartz, Merl None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 98-16 is a true and complete record of the action taken he Planning mmission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meet i g o pril Peter Tucker, Ch.. rman 5-19-9B Date pc/5-19-98/conr705 9 /5- ecretary 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 98-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO RECONFIGURE THE LAYOUT AND INCREASE THE COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE OF AN EXISTING LUMBER YARD SITE AT 635 AND 705 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Michael Learned, et al, owner of real property at 635 Pacific Coast Highway and owner in escrow of real property at 705 Pacific Coast Highway, seeking approval of a Precise Development Plan to reconfigure the layout and increase the commercial frontage of their existing commercial lumber yard and hardware/building supply store. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the application for a Precise Development Plan on April 21, 1998, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The existing lumber yard and building/hardware supply store have been in operation at the subject location since the 1920's. 2. The lumber yard as currently configured, is located on 128 feet of frontage on Pacific Coast Highway with a depth of 290 feet, including 150 feet of frontage on 6th Street. Primary customer and employee access is from 6th Street. The frontage on P.C.H. is proposed to be expanded to 256 feet, and the overall depth from P.C.H. reduced to 170 feet. The frontage on 6th Street is to be maintained. The applicants are proposing to continue to operate the lumber yard and building/hardware supply store on the newly configured site, and to relocate the primary access and customer parking to the P.C.H. frontage. 3. The site is zoned for commercial use, with a specific designation of Specific Plan Area No. 7. A lumber yard is a permitted use in said zone, pursuant to Section 17.26.030 of the zoning ordinance Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Precise Development Plan: 1. The project is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans, and is in compliance with the use and development requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The site is zoned S.P.A. 7, Specific Plan Area -Commercial, and the project and proposed use complies with the development standards contained therein (Sections 17.38.270- 330). 9 r6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3. Compliance with the Conditions of Approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting from the issuance of the Precise Development Plan. 4.The Planning Commission concurs with the Staff Environmental Review Committee's recommendation, based on their environmental assessment/initial study, that this project will result in a less than significant impact on the environment, and therefore qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the subject Precise Development Plan, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of April 21, 1998. Modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. 2. There shall be compliance with all requirements of the Fire Department to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief. 3. Construction traffic shall be routed away from residential streets, and access the site directly from P.C.H., or from P.C.H. via 6th Street east of any residential uses, to the maximum extent feasible. The applicant shall submit a Construction Management Plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of Building Permits, coordinated with the Construction Plan for the adjacent Condominium Project. (Required Hazard and Noise Mitigation Measure) 4. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department. 5. Final building plans/construction drawings including site, elevation, floor plan, sections, details, landscaping and irrigation, submitted for building permit issuance shall be reviewed for consistency with the plans approved by the Planning Commission and the conditions of this resolution, and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any Building Permit. 6. All exterior lights shall be located and oriented in a manner to insure that neighboring residential property and public right-of-way shall not be adversely effected 7. The project and operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code Section 5. This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owners of the property involved have filed at the office of the Planning Division of the Community Development Department their affidavits stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. at C7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • The Precise Development Plan shall be recorded, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if one of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employee to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of the State Government Code. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall no thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full complianceshall be a violation of these conditions. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Comm. Perrotti, Pizer, Chmn.Tucker None Comms. Schwartz, Merl None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that' the foregoing Resolution P.C. 98-17 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their re meetingof A� j. 21, 1998. Peter Tucker, ' hairman 3-49- 98 Date pc\5-19-98\rspdp705 9 April 14, 1998 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission April 21, 1998 SUBJECTS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-1 ZONE CHANGE 98-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-4 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 98-4 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #52508 ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION LOCATION: 635 & 705 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY APPLICANT: MICHAEL LEARNED ET AL & JCC HOMES REQUESTS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM CC (COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR) TO MD (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL), AND ZONE CHANGE FROM SPAT (SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7) TO R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #52508 ON THE REAR PORTION OF TWO COMMERCIAL PARCELS FRONTING ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (635 AND 705 P.C.H.) FOR AN 8 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT TAKING ACCESS FROM 7TH STREET PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO RECONFIGURE THE LAYOUT AND INCREASE THE P.C.H. FRONTAGE OF THE EXISTING LUMBER YARD Recommendation Based upon previous City Council policy direction: 1) Deny the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, and therefore: 2) Deny the requested entitlements for development of residential condominiums 3) Deny the requested Precise Development Plan for reconfiguration of the lumber yard. ALTERNATIVE 1) ffthe Planning Commission recommends approval of the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, staff recommends that such recommendation include direction to staff that a fiscal impact analysis, be prepared by the applicant prior to City Council consideration of the matter. The study should identify and examine the net reduction in commercial acreage, net gain in residential acreage, corresponding tax, service demand, and trade area implications for future highway oriented development and demonstrate that there are no adverse fiscal impacts to the City with the proposed land use changes. 2) Approval of the requested entitlements for the condominium project and lumber yard reconfiguration subject to specific Conditions of Approval, including the following: 1) That the commercial parking area along 6th Street be legally merged with the P.C.H. fronting commercial property providing for exclusive commercial development of the southerly parking area including City vacation of two alleys separating the properties; 2) Traffic circulation improvements pursuant to recommendations of the City traffic engineer and, 3) Redesign and reduction of the size of the condominium project to conform to the Subdivision Ordinance consistent with single family type development. > 11 11 • Project / Site Information GENERAL PLAN: Commercial Corridor ZONING: C-3 SITE AREA: 90,531 Square Feet EXISTING USES AND AREA (in Sq. Ft.): 705 P.C.H.:Vacated Comm./Res. Building and Motel (37,160) 635 P.C.H: Lumber Yard (53, 371) PROPOSED LOT SIZES (in Sq. Ft.) Commercial Lot Residential Lot 43,573 30,759 The subject site is located on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway between 6th Street and 8th Street. The existing commercial lot depths are 290 feet, and the rear lot lines are coterminous with the General Plan/Zoning boundary lines separating commercial from residential (As a result of previous land use designation changes in 1989 with respect to the P.C.H. Multi -Use Corridor). The Lumber Yard has been in operation at this location since the 1920's, and the Motel/Commercial building was constructed in the 1940's. Background The current applicant and property owners have been pursuing redevelopment of the subject properties for several months. Efforts to redevelop the underutilized property at 705 P.C.H. have been going on for several years, and recently the Mar Vista Motel and a 2 -story structure were closed due to non-compliance with the seismic retrofit ordinance. In October 1997, the City Council denied a requested General Plan Amendment/Zone Change for the same property in conjunction with a proposed 24 -unit condominium development which included additional property fronting on 6th Street. Project access was proposed from 6th Street. The denial was based upon Council reluctance to reduce the commercial lot depth of the property and the future development limitations created by the proposed redesignation of highway oriented commercial properties. The Staff Environmental Review Committee, at their meeting of March 12, recommended a Mitigated Negative Declaration, finding that that all potentially significant environmental impacts could be mitigated to less than significant levels.' Analysis The City Council previously denied a similar zone change and General Plan Amendment with the finding that it is desirable to maximize the commercial lot depth along the Pacific Coast Highway corridor. Based upon this previous policy direction, staff is recommending denial of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Without the redesignation of the property, no residential use is permitted, and the reconfiguration of the lumber yard would not be possible under the current project proposal. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONE CHANGE POLICY ISSUES The proposal involves a major land use decision regarding the redesignation and rezoning of the rear portion of the subject commercial lots for residential use, thereby significantly reducing potential commercial development. Under the revised land use changes, commercial interest in reinvestment for this block may be reduced, as the commercial lot depth would preclude major highway oriented development. The remaining 1 commercial properties would have a depth of 168 feet. The City Council previously noted that the proposed rezoning could have implications for reinvestment for the entire commercial corridor as this is one of the few remaining parcels on Pacific Coast Highway with 300 foot depth. Redesignation of the property could preclude certain commercial developers from locating projects along this segment of P.C.H. Potential commercial projects that would require maintenance of the existing depth are larger retail development and hotel /motel uses. The City has recently received inquiries regarding hotel/motel development reflecting increased demand for these uses generally. A developer associated with Fairfield Suites (a division of Marriot), has recently expressed interest in the property at 705 Pacific Coast Highway for a small hotel. The existing depth of the commercial designation (Commercial Corridor) and the zoning (S.P.A. 7) are based on land use/zoning designations that date back to 1956 when the City's first Zoning Ordinance was adopted, prior to that the designations on City 'Land Use Maps" only provided for a commercial depth of 100 -feet deep. More recently, when General Plan and zoning designations along large sections of P.C.H. were examined, the deeper 290 -foot commercial depths were maintained and reconfirmed for the subject parcels and redesignated to Commercial Corridor and S.P.A. 7 from a `Multi -Use Corridor" designation (1989 Multi -Use Corridor Study). This decision was consistent with the stated objectives of the study to maximize commercial potential. The specific factors that applied to the subject locations were both the extent of existing commercial development (the lumber yard) and the depth of the commercial development to the south which is also 290 feet. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECT The applicant is proposing the Medium Density Residential General Plan designation with R-2 zoning, consistent with zoning patterns for the neighborhoods to the south and west which have been developed on a lot by lot basis. This development pattern has resulted in either two or three unit condominiums, and single- family development. The proposed project density of 11.3 units is well below the maximum density for the MD residential designation (24 units per acre)2. However, the project will be developed in a pattern which is not consistent with surrounding residential development in that each unit will be developed on a lot" which is undersized in comparison with surrounding development. The proposed development is inconsistent with the development standards of Section 16.08.860 of the Subdivision Ordinance and for the R-1 and R-2 zones. The applicant is proposing a single-family style detached townhome with a condominium form of ownership. Each separate ownership is provided on a 29 X 108 foot private lot" without the minimum 40 - foot lot width required for typical single family or multi -family development in the area. Access to each unit will be from 7th Street via a private drive or private street which will be an extension of 7th Street. Therefore while the project is consistent with the zoning pattern, it is inconsistent with the development pattern for the area. (Attached Exhibit A & B also show what the resulting number of units would be under a more typical residential subdivisions using minimum 40 ` wide and 4000 square foot lot sizes -12 units if two units per lot provided or 6 units as single-family lots). PROJECT DESIGN Each unit contains a 2 -car garage and two guest parking spaces located in front of the garage. An additional 2 guest parking spaces are provided along the common driveway/private street. Adequate private open and recreation space is provided in the rear yard areas, and common open space is located in two locations along the private driveway. The two-story units contain 3,000 square feet with 4-5 bedrooms and 3 baths with clay tile roof and stucco walls and Mediterranean style architecture. The architecture of the development is undifferentiated with similar plans, building setbacks and deck locations. All decks or balconies are located on the same (west) side of the building facade and there are only slight variations for roof lines and window openings. The narrow lot"width for each unit, similar floor plans and setbacks and narrow 118 foot long 1 >. • • private street creates an unvaried look for the entire residential development. Staffhas recommended that the number of units be reduced to six to create larger dwelling units, but that the increased building size be offset with additional setbacks, building articulation and a more varied building line which would enhance the look of the entire project and make it more consistent with single family style development. Staff has also recommended that a raised landscaped setback (provided by easement on the residential portion of the project) be provided for the length of the project easterly boundary in order to screen the existing lumber yard from view. The existing lumber stacks are unattractive and highly visible in the area and require an elevated planter of sufficient size to provide Targe tree planting to adequately screen the lumber yard from residential uses. PROJECT TRAFFIC The projected traffic generation from this project is a daily trip total of 120, an AM peak hour generation of 11 (3 inbound, 8 outbound) and a PM peak hour of 13 (8 inbound, 5 outbound). These trips will be divided between northbound and southbound along Ardmore Avenue (84 northbound per day and 36 southbound).3 Overall, the proposed residential will have a minimal impact upon area circulation. In order to address the concern about the excessive commercial truck traffic, staff previously suggested to the applicant that access from 6th Street be closed or modified for left turn exiting only. The applicant is also willing to provide a knuckle or some other type of traffic control device to force this left turn which must be approved by the City's consulting traffic engineer. The traffic study submitted by the applicant includes existing Learned Lumber generated traffic, and the projected traffic with these modified driveways. The modifications are projected to substantially reduce the commercial intrusion onto 6th Street by 304 trips. 4 PROPOSED RECONFIGURATION OF LUMBER YARD The proposed new layout for the lumber yard/hardware store will provide more commercial frontage, and orient customer parking and circulation towards Pacific Coast Highway. Customer parking is proposed to be added near the new P.C.H. entrance, and employee and customer parking will be maintained along 6th Street in its current configuration. The existing two driveways on P.C.H. will be combined and enlarged into one wide drive .to accommodate two-way traffic with better vision clearance. The plan also re -aligns all the lumber stacks in a north -south direction. Overall, the plan is a more efficient layout for the continued operation of an existing business, and may result in less impact on adjacent residential uses, particularly with respect to commercial vehicle use of 6th Street. However, large truck circulation and employee traffic is still proposed through 6th Street which is a concern to 6th Street residents. With respect to location of the lumber stacks, the new stacks would comply with the U.B.C./Fire Code requirement for a 10 -foot setback from the property line. Five feet of this 10 -foot setback area would be open storage area for non-flammable materials and the other five feet is provided as a landscaped buffer for the residential project, to be conveyed as an easement. Staffhas recommended that this distance be increased to provide adequate landscape screening from the residential project. In addition, the proposed plan does not indicate how loading and unloading of delivery trucks occurs without conflicting with customer traffic. The locations for saws and other noise generating equipment is not indicated, and should be considered relative to the neighborhood. Although this is an existing business, the new configuration increases the amount of the site perimeter that will abut residential uses warranting consideration of these operational issues. To address existing complaints and prevent future enforcement problems in respect of these residential uses, the existing early morning lumber delivery hours and fork-lift operations should be adjusted. The applicant has also submitted the following general information about existing operations: • Hours of Operation: Monday -Friday 7-6; Saturday 8-5; and Sunday 9-3 20-25 Employees M -F • The business receives 5 large truck and trailer deliveries per day and 3 van truck deliveries 2Z • • • The business ships five 10 -wheel truckloads per day and 5-6 smaller flatbed truckloads. The business does not deliver via truck and trailers. • The business averages about 210 transactions per day, generating approximately 150 customer trips. • The business fleet includes one 10 -wheel truck and 3 flatbed trucks. They also operate 4 circular saws, a band saw and 3 forklifts. If the Commission approves the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, the approval should be based upon review and approval of a fiscal impact study identifying the impacts resulting from the reduction in potential commercial development and corresponding increase in residentially designated land. The study can be required as a Condition of the development permit. Further, because of current lot ownership and zoning patterns, there is potential for loss of commercial property parking lot areas located on 6th Street. The continued use of the lumber yard or some other commercial use can be ensured by tying all lots that comprise Learned Lumber including the 6th Street parking areas 5 and conditioning approval of the Precise Development Plan for the Lumber Yard reconfiguration to maintain a highway oriented commercial use. Such approval should also include partial vacation of the City's alley rights-of-way . CONCUR: Sol Blumenfeld Director Community Development Department Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution of denial 2. Area Map / Zoning and General Plan Maps 3. Exhibits 4. Staff Environmental Review Committee Notes/Checklist 5. Written Correspondence Ken Robertson Associate Planner Notes ' Staff Environmental Staff Review Committee held on March 12, 1998. 2 The surrounding maximum density to the south (assuming lot by lot 2 -unit development would be 20 units per acre, and to the north on 8th Street (assuming lot by lot single-family due to smaller lot sizes) would be 14 units per acre. The overall current density for all the R-2 zoned lots between Ardmore and P.C.H., south of 11th Street is 21 units per acre. 3 Traffic Study prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan (attached) 4 Traffic Study prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan (Exhibits 12 & 13) S Two of these parcels could potentially revert to residential use pursuant to the existing SPA zoning which permits residential redevelopment under certain conditions. These lots are not included in the zone change/General Plan Amendment application. The potential for losing the lumber yard and other commercially used properties could be reduced with a Condition requiring continued commercial use for the proposed project, lot ties for all adjacent Learned Lumber lots and vacation of alleys separating these properties. 705(2) 11-011-4AIIET 1 1 A S 1 UM !UM 8 MOPOSED mom FOR 'MOULD a ASSOC., INC. TIMOTHY SAACISZIA.1.11+11 J.C.C. KIES !AWN VISTA PROM luiLLEL . P1.111111114 111161111TECT_ REAR ELEVATION T.L. /OW Tu In REAR ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION put�F . wiilR ImE (4•..710 I.C. a Tu R MI MOM= I- � ELA.R ELEVATION IOC. AM Til M nzsrp 11:::11::' ,":11:: �IIIIIII II FRONT ELEVATION ELEV.S-4 1* I r� E..ITIE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION r ®ni ELEVATION r ELEV. P -z N oFZTr+ ELEV. E-1 ELEV.h 3 �,. OMNI- REAR-0' ELEVATION REAR' ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION EAI ELEVATION OGLE L/1'-i OGLE. REAL.ELEVATION 14014'11+ 11111111111 1111111 IMF FRONT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION !ELEV. A -ll ELEV. 8-Z 5OLLTN FRO 4T ELEVATION aO T ELEVATION ELEV. q-3 ti ELEV. Bl -3 - N y R -I R -I r• J r' R -I • W OCEAN R -I C-3 3 R-2 b Op " R-2 VALL Y OS CLARK STADIUM I- R -I R -I it DRIVE C-3 -z 0 2 R-2 R2 R-2 C-3; N ` R0-2 N VIEW AVE. R -I ISPA 7 ao a NINTH / GENERAL PLAN Mr', EIGHTH PLACE EIGHTH ST. n NINTH FY.•Nr 0 EIGHTH yr' sac FAA • 0 "a • 0 ST 0 PLACE 0 SEVENTH 'ST SEVENTH ST 0 SIXTH 0 0 ST. 1 IC, 0 0 FIFTH ST ST FOURTH 0 0 / So ; o 0' •1 SIXTH 0 71 3 0 FIFTH JIEL FOURTH CS C) 0 .sz THIRD b. ST !Pt 3 0 ST FOURTH r- 0 C) FIRST .78e ST. FIRST •0 C) 0 8TH fv/o (az z, 632 (oaf 6+fo fora to69 70Y 769 7z0 1.179 J6.6/ 86.6/ 33' - 12 I I ® ,0 16 15 14 13 12 II Jo : 13 �i b 17 > a C71 ' Q 4/./B h 3S 65 t1.1 I,3 /O t� 0 of i9 7 0 l Ck' Jai 44.51 e 7TH .i0 50. 03 ,iia r SHEET 2 I • ..4500/" • 21 SHEET 2 6TH 36.67 36.0/ 33 B 10 LK 9 0 Ar 7 6 • ST. 727 13 0 t3 4 3 2 Its %R. 31 2J 40 40 IO SHEET 2 Ia •40 fo/c 40 3 35 15 2 40 14 40 ef515 40 4,31 64,7 (053 S T. 9 40 i 190 . 250 N I• SHEET 3 . SHEET 3 I # I i 17 40 16 290 0 if, a� i .i _;1 • 4.-8 7 6 it 5 1 4 1 I N 3o 37,/50±•' 0 to N I.) Poe .90 ST. a EXHIBIT A: SIX (6) CONSISTENT SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS 29' /eT .90 70.5. /el 1 1 al 90 1 JO W • • 8TH ,3Z to - • b 17 a{ese: '0 Cr tZ 19 � 0 7 J Q� JO44.52 Q 344/ I I 15 33 ' - ® 0 14 13 33 so ' SHEET 2 7TH /a 6ifo (oso ( d 70 `/ 7 ST. 7.7 40 35 15 3 2 40 115 95 40 4,37 6407 6.013 S T. J7/50ta. ro 6/./7 40 6TH tO ST. a EXHIBIT B: SIX (6) CONSISTENT LOTS, TWO UNITS PER LOT 30 705 aJ -I r a n o z C x c V N • Excerpted from 1989 ' •i -Use Corridor Study (Pa4e 1 of 4). EXHIBIT A Proposed Commercial Corridor Boundary (Page 1 of 2) 11, 0 n D • r) r • 19 • • "Multi•=iJe Corridor" _3J iirir Commercial Corridor • S Excerpted from 1989 fv. ,i -Use Corridor Study (Page 2 of 4) 8TH STREET TO 6TH STREET (West Side) FRONTAGE: 443 feet DEPTH OF MUC: 290 feet DEPTH OF C-3 ZONING: 122 feet, 290 feet, 170 feet South side of 8th Street: Existing development consists of the "Music Plus" store, zoned C-3. to a depth of 122 feet. Behind this store on property zoned R -2(C) is an older single-family home for sale, and a new 4 -unit apartment and a duplex both in good condition. These residential uses are part of a neighborhood of single-family and two-family developments on both sides of 8th street which continue to the west. They directly abut commercially zoned vacant land to the south. The existing commercial depth seems adequate to accomodate the existing commercial use. A recent attempt to expand that depth to provide more parking was supported by the City only with stringent conditions because of the concern of residents in the 8th street neighborhood. Given this concern, the decent quality of the neighborhood, and the 50 foot commercial depth across 8th street to the north, staff feels the commercial designation should extend no further than the existing commercial depth of 122 feet. Middle of the block: Existing development consists of a series of old commercial buildings fronting on P.C.H. containing"Recycled Records," and a Thai Restaurant," which apparently have residences above, and the "Mar Vista" motel, which has rooms to the rear of the front building, and "Learned Lumber." These businesses are located on lots zoned C-3 with depth of 290 feet. In the rear of the lot containing the motel there is an old residence and a large vacant field. The 290 foot depth of commercial zoning accomodates the existing lumber yard, and would be conducive to the possible turnover or improvement of the lot containing the motel. This depth should be maintained in a commercial designation. North side of 6th Street Existing development consists of an auto supply store and the "Remax Realtors" office building on P.C.H. Behind these uses to a depth of 200 feet is an access drive and parking area for "Learned Lumber," a 2 -unit development in poor condition at 721 under the same ownership, and two older single family homes in fair condition. The C-3 zoning goes to a depth of 170 feet, followed by an SPA zone from 170 feet to 230 feet, and an R -P zone from 230 feet to 290 feet. Because the depth 'of existing commercial development extends to 200 feet and the next adjacent lot is under the same ownership 9 '32- • Excerpted from 198QqtIti-Use Corridor Study (rage 3 of: developed with an older residential development in poor condition, Staff believes that the commercial depth should be extended to at least 230 feet to include this lot. Also, because the next two lots are already zoned R -P and front on a local street which which is highly undesirable (automotive uses are located directly across the street) these lots should also be included to a depth of 290 feet. RECONNENDATION Locate the Commercial/SPA boundary at a depth of 122 feet along the south side of 8th Street, coterminous with the C-3 boundary; at a depth of 290 feet in the middle of the block, coterminous with the C-3 boundary; and at a depth of 290 feet along the north side of 6th Street at the current R-P/R-2 zoning boundary. 3,3 iii :t. Address 1th St.- 6th St. iS 8th St. 720 8th St. 710 8th St. 704 8th St. %long P.C.H. Lot Size Use • Excerpted from 1989 Multi- se Corridor Study (Page 4 of 4) Approx. Dist. Dist. Similar Use Current Use Date Cond. from from Adjacent Across Slope Zone Conf' Const. PCH ECB* Uses Street ing? / 5020 SFR 1923 Fair 122-188 0 Comm/E. SFR Flat R -2C Yes 5020 4UApt. 1986 Good 188-254 66 Yes SFR Flat R -2C No 2510 Dup. 1958 Good 254-287 122 Yes SFR Flat R -2C Yes 129 P.C.H. 9270 Comm. 1948 Fair 0-122 Res/bhd Com/SFR Flat C-3 Yes 705 P.C.H. 37150 Com.Res. 1940 Fr/Pr 0-290 Res/bhd - Flat C-3 Yes 535'P.C.H.• 37150 Comm. 1930 Fair 0-290 - Res/bhd - Flat' C-3 .Yes 519 P.C.N. 3150 Auto/Com 1940 Fair 0-90 Yes - Flat C-3 Yes 501 P.C.H. 6570 Comm.. 1973 Fair 0-90 Yes Comm. Flat C-3 Yes NS 6th St. 725 6th St. 723 6th St. 721 6th St. 709 6th St. 707 6th St. 5880 Comm. Pkg lot Fair 110-170 Yes Comm. Flat C-3 Yes 2940 Comm. Pkg lot Fair 170-200 Res/bhd Comm. Flat SPA -2 Yes 2940 2U/det. 1927 Poor 200-230 0 Com/E/N Comm. Mod. SPA -2 Yes 2940 SFR 1958 Fair 230-260 30 Com/ Comm. Mod. R -P Yes 2940 2U/det. 1959 Fair 260-290 60 Com/ Comm. Mod. R -P Yes EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY PROPOSED COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ElMULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three oc.mote units) • • 7a7 701 IZI 7Zrj 7z5 ST: °• • NOTES STAFF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS March 12, 1998 10:00 A.M. Staff Attendees: Ken Robertson, Charlie Swartz, Joe Mankewich GP 98-1 / ZON 98-1 / CON 98-4 / PDP 98-4 General Plan amendment from Commercial Corridor (CC) to Medium Density Residential (MD) and Zone Change from SPAT (Specific Plan Area No. 7) to R-2, and a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map #52508, for an eight -unit detached residential condominium project taking access from 7th street, on the rear portion of two commercial parcels fronting on Pacific Coast Highway (635 and 705 Pacific Coast Highway), and Precise Development Plan to reconfigure the layout and increase the Pacific Coast Highway frontage of the existing lumber yard at 635 and 705 Pacific Coast Highway. Applicants: Richard Gould, JCC Homes; Michael Learned Learned Lumber Ken R Gives overview of project proposal, noting that it brings up similar environmental issues as previous project at this location, but at a smaller scale since the number of units and the area involved have been reduced This, in effect, has eliminated any significant traffic impacts, as borne out by the applicant's traffic study. Issues related to construction impacts, are still significant, and the study recommends mitigating these by directing all construction traffic from P.C.H. through the Learned property. Richard Gould, stated that he and Mr. Learned had already discussed the construction issue, and were will to bring most the traffic either from P.C.H. through the Learned Site, or from 6th Street through the Learned site. He noted that a limited number of vehicles might have to come via 7th Street either because of size constraints, or to do the off-site work on 7th Street. Ken R Notes that staff's initial study includes a discussion, in the Land Use and Planning section that the General Plan Amendment to reduce commercial depth will result in some potential economic/fiscal impacts, which are not considered significant environmental issues, but will be considered in the final a policy decision on the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change. Joe M went over the Public Works Department required off-site improvements, and discussed with the applicants the recommendation for a rolled curb for the entire length of 7th Street, and upgrades to the existing sewer line for the length of 7th Street, if necessary. Scott Alden, 7th St.,Resident, noted concerns about lack of vision clearance at the 7th Street/Acdmore Ave. Intersection, and the impact of increased usage of the intersection. 3S • • Thought maybe a stop sign should be considered He also noted concern with the lack of guest parking other than behind the individual units, and his desire for the street to be improved with full sidewalk, curb, and gutter. The committee discussed the issue of sidewalk, vs. rolled curb and gutter, and decided that a further investigation was necessary, as full sidewalk may require removal of landscaping, retaining walls and loss of parking for existing residents. The Committee discussed site plan and design issues with applicants, with staff noting potential conflicts with the zoning code relative to building separation and required common recreation space. Motion: Ken R Recommends the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, with mitigation measure relative to construction traffic to be re -worded for the applicant to submit a construction management plan, rather than requiring ALL traffic to diverted Charlie S. 2nds, So Ordered 36 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: , GP 98-1, ZON 98-1, CON 98-4, P.D.P. 98-4, TRACT MAP NO. 52508 Reconfiguration of existing commercial properties to allow for an 8 -unit detached residential condominium in the rear portion with access from 7th Street. 2. Project Location: 635 and 705 Pacific Coast Highway 3. Project Sponsors: JCC Homes and Michael Learned et al 4. Lead Agency : City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 5. Contact Person: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner - (310) 318-0242 6. General Plan Designation: Commercial Corridor 7. Zoning:S.P.A. 7 8. Description of Project: General Plan Amendment from Commercial Corridor to Medium Density Residential and Zone Change from S.P.A 7 (Specific Plan Area #7) to R-2 (Two -Family Residential), and Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan for a 8 -unit detached Condominium, for the rear 120 of the existing 290 -foot depth lots. The resulting density of the of 8 -unit project is 11.3 units per acre which is lower than the density range for the MD classification (14-25 dwelling units per acre). Precise Development Plan, to reconfigure and relocate lumber storage areas and to add on site parking for the existing lumber yard, and to reduce its depth and lengthen its frontage on Pacific Coast Highway. Project construction will involve the demolition of the existing commercial buildings at 705 P.C.H. (a motel, and two story commercial building), and the relocation of the lumber stacks and parking areas to the north along P.C.H. An 8 -unit detached residential condominium project will be constructed on the rear portion, with access from the west via 7th Street. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: Commercial uses are located to the north (a retail furniture store) and south (auto repair) and across P.C.H. to the east. The P.C.H. corridor is a highly traveled urban corridor, located in an urban setting, consisting of primarily strip commercial development, which includes several automotive related uses such as sales, repair, and parts sales. Residential uses are located to the west and the north and south of the rear portion of the lots, consisting of a mix of single family homes and two-family (two -on -a -lot) and some multi -family development. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) CalTrans for any changes to curb cuts on P.C.H. • • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use and Planning ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Geological Problems ❑ Water O Air Quality DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Energy and Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ® Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources ® Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, that there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environmental, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signature �� - Date /� P��`-4 1 L svN� 5 fit GmKtrvvw.u.A..4D1 NAIL (NJ For Comm t'+t.A. Printed Name t9 • • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low income or minority community)? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ El I -a The project requires a general plan amendment from Commercial Corridor to Medium Density Residential, and Zone Change from S.P.A. 7 to Two -Family Residential (R-2). These changes could substantially alter the potential future land use of the site, as it will reduce the available potential depth for commercial development as measured from P.C.H., and increase the amount of available land for residential development. The change would be consistent with the commercial depths north of the site but result in a lesser depth of commercial depth relative to properties to the south. The reduction of the potential commercial development may have a long term economic impact on the corridor and a fiscal impact on the City by reducing the potential commercial sales tax revenue associated with this specific site, and the commercial viability of the P.C.H. corridor as a whole, and by potentially increasing the fiscal impact associated with added residential uses. The subject site is one of only a few remaining large parcels along the corridor with the potential for a large or "anchor" retail/commercial use. Given that the emphasis will remain commercial for the P.C.H. and the changes are a modification of the depth, these changes are not considered a significant environmental impact, but will result in a fiscal/economic impact that should be considered as part of the final policy decision. I -b Staff is not aware of any environmental plans or policies specifically related to this subject site or area, which is in an urban setting, that the proposed project would conflict with. I -c The proposed eventual uses of the property will be compatible with the surrounding uses which include residential uses to the north and west of the proposed 8 -unit condominium with a MD residential General Plan Designation and R-2 zoning, and commercial uses to the north and south of the lumber yard as reconfigured A landscaped buffer is proposed to minimize the conflict between the new residential uses and the lumberyard The proposed density below the range for the MD residential designation, being only 11.3 units per acre, while 3`� • • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact the surrounding existing residential development to the south is about 20 units per acre, and to the north 14 units per acre. I -d The project would not affect agricultural resources or operations as neither the project site nor the surrounding uses are currently used for farming operations and the site 's soils are not considered agriculturally significant. I -e The project is located within an urbanized area with a mix of uses, and the proposed residential use would not divide the community. Sources: City of Hermosa Beach General Plan, City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code H. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructures? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ IZI ❑ ❑ ❑ El II -a The potential addition of 8 residential dwelling units in an area designated for commercial uses will incrementally alter the expected housing and population projections for the City. However, this is not considered significant. II -b The project would not induce growth in Hermosa Beach, or the regional area. The highly urbanized area is already served by extensive infrastructure. II -c As the project site is already developed with commercial buildings, the proposed project would not displace any existing housing. III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? b) Seismic ground shaking? c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? it LD ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? e) Landslides or mudflows? f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? h) Expansive soil? I) Unique geologic or physical features? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El III -a There are no known fault lines in the City and the locations of past epicenters do not indicate the presence of fault areas in Hermosa Beach.. III -b During the life of the project it may be subject to a major earthquake, which may cause damage to the proposed residential dwellings and present a hazard to residents. Existing Building regulations such as the UBC address these seismic hazards, and City review of construction plans for compliance with all applicable regulations is considered adequate to reduce risks to less -than -significant. III -c The site has not been surveyed for susceptibility to seismically induce hazards such as liquefaction. Geotechnical studies required as part of the development review process will address these potential hazards. It is expected the such hazards will be adequately addressed through compliance with the UBC and through implementation of the recommendations set forth in required geotechnical studies. III -d There is no potential for either seats or volcanic activity, or a tsunami at the subject site. III -e The project site is in a developed area which is characterized by low topographic relief Landslides and mudflows are thus not considered to be a hazards in the project area. III -f The project will involve grading, excavation, and filling which could result in erosion or unstable soil conditions. Geotechnical studies required as part of the plan review process would address the potential for erosion or unstable soil conditions and would include measures to reduce or eliminate these hazards. III g Subsidence as well as other potential geotechnical hazards will be evaluated and addressed by geotechnical studies required as part of the plan review process. It is expected that any such hazards can be addressed through routine engineering design employed in the area. III -h The potential for encountering expansive soils at the project site is considered to be low, as sandy soils, such as those characterizing the project area, are not considered expansive. III -i The project site contains no unique geologic or physical features. 4-, • • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Sources: City or Hermosa Beach General Plan, Seismic Safety Element U.S. Geological Service Map, Redondo Beach Quadrangle 7.5 Minute Series (Topography) IV. WATER Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Cl ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl ❑ 0 El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ Cl El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El IV -a The project will result in modification to drainage patterns and internalflows, but is not expected to significantly alter the volume of water that drains off the site to the local storm drain system. Development and construction plans required as part of the plan review process will evaluate volumes of discharge and storm system connections, and compliance with these plans and the requirements of the Public Works Department would address any potential impacts and provide for proper connections andflows into the local storm drains, and any need for improvements to said system.. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact IV -b -i There are no impacts anticipated to these items as there are no known water bodies or groundwater which might be affected by the construction or operation of the project. V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any chance in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 El O 0 0 El V -a The proposed condominium project would replace the existing commercial uses on the 705 P.C.H. site which already generate mobile source (vehicle emissions) as well as other non-mobile sources of emissions related to the existing uses. The proposed residential uses will also result in the generation of mobile source emissions with total traffic trips to likely be at a higher rate. In total, the overall impact on air quality is expected to incrementally more than the existing uses, with different type of air quality impacts at differing times of the day. These impacts are anticipated to the less than significant. V -b As noted above, the air quality impacts will be altered only marginally, and thus any changes to existing exposure to existing sensitive receptors (nearby residential areas) will be less than significant. V -c No potential exists to alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate. V -d The project is not expected to result in the generation of objectionable odors. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ 0 ® 0 b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp 0 ❑ ® ❑ curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? 0 0 ® 0 d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ❑ 0 ® ❑ t �-3 • • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative ❑ ❑ ❑ transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 ❑ ❑ VI -a The timing, volume, and pattern of vehicle trips will be altered, which may potentially increase the total number of trips as compared to the pre-existing commercial uses. This change in vehicular circulation and traffic may potentially result in impacts on nearby local and collector residential streets and intersections with Pacific Coast Highway. These impacts are quantified in the attached "Traffic Impact Analysis" prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan. which projects that the trip generation association with the subject residential proposal will result in the addition of 120 trip ends per day, with 11 additional trips in the AM and 13 in the PM peak hours. The analysis further shows that these additional trips do not result in any impacts on current levels of service of nearby signalized intersections. The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed this study and concurs with the conclusion of less than significant impact. The analysis also projects that due to the reconfiguration to the driveways and site orientation of the lumber yard that existing commercially generated vehicle trips which " intrude" onto 6th Street will be reduced VI -b Changes in traffic patterns by increasing direct access to P. C.H. may possibly increase safety hazards, especially if left -turns will occur in and out of this newly widened driveway. Caltrans must review and approve this access plan to ensure that safety hazards are less than significant. Otherwise, the project is not expected to increase or contribute to hazards to public safety. VI -c Emergency access would be available to the site, but requires emergency vehicles to do a 3 -point turn to exit back out of the condominiums. This will be evaluated for and required to comply with fire safety and emergency access standards as part of the plan review and approval process. VI -d Adequate parking would be provided on-site for the occupants of the proposed development, with guest parking provided in the 17 foot setback areas provided behind the garage which complies with the requirements of the zoning ordinance. Providing the guest parking in this way, does not provide any guest parking separate from the individual units. Further no on -street guest parking will be available given the design of the project with common drives and no public street. This is a design /policy issue and not considered a potentially significant impact. VI -e The project would not result in the creation of hazards or barriers to pedestrians or bicycles. As noted above, the increased traffic flows on existing intersections might marginally increase hazards at these locations, this is considered less than significant. VI -f The proposed project would be designed to comply with any applicable policies supporting alternative transportation. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VI -g The proposed project would not effect rail, waterborne, or air traffic. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees) ? c) Locally designed natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? El ❑ ❑ IZI ❑ El El El El El El El El El El El El El El VII -a -e The project site is currently fully developed in an urban setting, and contains negligible vegetation or habitats for any flora or fauna, and the proposed project would not cause any adverse impacts to biological resources. VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful an inefficient manner? c) Results in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the and the residents of the state? El El El El El ❑ El El VIII -a The proposed project would be required to be constructed to comply with energy conservation standards in the State's Uniform Building Code. VIII --b The size of the project and the nature of the residential use would not involve significant or wasteful use of non-renewable resources. Application of the existing regulations are considered adequate to ensure that non-renewable resources would not be used in an inefficient or wasteful manner. VIII -c There have been no significant amount of mineral deposits identified at this site, or in the City of Hermosa Beach. Should there be potential for encountering sub -surface oil deposits, development of the site 1 13-5 • • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact with residential uses would not preclude or significantly effect future exploitation of these resources if it was desired. Source: City of Hermosa Beach General Plan, Conservation Element IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) _ The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, ❑ grass, or trees? IX -a Construction of the project may involve the use of diesel oil, and pesticides on landscaping. The use of these substances is typical of most construction projects and the risk of accidental explosion or release is considered negligible. IX -b The size and location of the project would not interfere with City-wide emergency response and evacuation plans.. IX -c The historical use of the site for commercial makes it possible that contamination of the soil and/or groundwater has occurred, and could create a health hazard during construction or to occupants during the life of the project. Soil studies required as part of the plan review process would address the potential for any health hazards and would include measures to reduce or eliminate these hazards. However, during the construction phase of the condominium project residents along local residential streets may be exposed to significant construction vehicle traffic, which would include the hauling of debris and construction materials with large trucks. This can be mitigated by routing all construction traffic away from residential streets, and access it directly from P. C.H., or from P. C.H. via 6th Street east of any residential uses. IX -d Occupancy of the proposed residential dwellings adjacent to the existing lumber yard use within this commercial may result in limited exposure of people to airborne particulates and/or fumes, or excessive noise. With the proposed landscaped buffer to separate the proposed residential uses from the lumber yard these hazards are not considered significant.. iC Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): S Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact IX -e The area is not characterized by existing flammable brush, grass, or trees, and the project would be constructed in compliance with fire safety standards. X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X -a Residential occupancy is expected only to negligibly affect the pattern and volume of existing noise levels. Construction noise will temporarily impact noise levels, typical for a project of this size and scale which is not considered significant due to the construction traffic route away from residential uses. X -b The occupancy of the residential dwellings may potentially expose people to noise generated from existing adjacent commercial land uses, this is not considered significant given the incorporation of a landscaped buffer in the project plans. However, construction noise will temporarily impact noise levels typical for a project of this size and scale which is reduced to a less than significant level since construction traffic is directed away from residential streets as noted in Section IX -c. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other governmental services? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Xl-a-e The addition of 8 residential dwelling units will marginally change the need for all these services. This is considered to be less than significant, as most of these services are already necessary for the operation of the commercial business on the site, and the marginal changes, such as added school aged residents should be easily accommodated by existing resources and facilities that area already available in this highly urbanized area. These impacts are also partially mitigated by various City required fees imposed on new construction, and the property taxes that will be generated from this project, which contribute towards the continued provision of these services. XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, substantial alterations to the following utilities: • • Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? 0 Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional water supplies? XII -a g The addition of 8 residential dwelling units will marginally change the total demand and the pattern of demand of all these utilities and service systems. This is considered to be less than significant, as these utilities and service systems are already necessary for the operation of the manufacturing and commercial business on the subjects, and the marginal changes, such as need for more phone lines, possible increases in sewer use and solid waste generation should be accommodated by existing utility and service systems that are already available in this highly urbanized area. These impacts are also partially mitigated by various City required fees imposed on new construction, and the property taxes that will be generated from this project which contribute towards maintenance and upgrading of these systems-. XII -d The City Public works department requirement to uupgrade the 7th Street sewer lline to an 8" diameter piper will be adequate to service the needs of this project and any potential future improvements/upgrades to existing residential properties on 7th Street. XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ XIII -a -b The proposed residential development would replace existing commercial uses that are of various architectural and building styles that do not possess any scenic attributes, frame or contribute to a scenic vista, or have any special aesthetic value. XIII -c The residential development would introduce new sources of light in the area, and change the pattern of lighting. This is not expected to be significant. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? - - b)— - Disturb archaeological resources? c) Affect historical resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ❑ ❑ ❑ El _❑- ❑ - ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ XIV -a -e there are no known cultural resources associate with this project site. XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ ❑ XV -a The added residents would marginally increase demand for parks and other recreational facilities. Based on the size of the project and the number of dwelling units this impact is considered to be less than significant, and is partially mitigated by the incorporation of recreational open space within the project, and by the required park fees that will be imposed on the development which contribute to maintenance, upkeep, and expansion of the City's park facilities. XV -b The proposed project will not impact any existing recreational opportunities. XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Supporting Information Sources. (The following are sources used and referred to in the initial study, and are incorporated herein by reference. All are available for review in the Community Development Department, Planning Division of the City of Hermosa Beach) 1. General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach (Land Use Element revised 1994) 2. City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 3. Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan Engineers, dated 2/11/98 4. Preliminary project plans submitted by the applicant 5. Memorandum from Ed Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer, dated March 11, 1998 XVIII. MITIGATION MEASURES Hazards 1. All construction traffic that can feasibly be routed away from residential streets shall be routed to the site directly from P.C.H., or from P.C.H. via 6th Street east of any residential uses. A construction traffic management plan shall be prepared, and approved by City, prior to issuance of building permits. Noise 1. All construction traffic that can feasibly be routed away from residential streets shall be routed to the site directly from P.C.H., or from P.C.H. via 6th Street east of any residential uses. A construction traffic management plan shall be prepared, and approved by City, prior to issuance of building permits as LEARNED LUMBER LUMBER PLYWOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS BUILDERS HARDWARE • rLL VVt_. MAR 3 0 1998 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 635 Pacific Coast Hwy., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 • (310) 374-3406 Fax (310) 374-3410 • El Segundo yard (310) 322-4595 Fax (310) 322-9821 March 27, 1998 Stephen Burrell, City Manager And Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Steve: RECEIVED APR 0 1 1998 COM. DEV. DEPT As you know we have been pursuing a land swap with JCC Homes that would allow us to get rid of the Motel buildings and increase Learned Lumbers presence on Pacific Coast Highway. Some council members have expressed their concern about losing commercial square footage on the highway. As a businessman, I happen to agree with that concern and I did the homework to trace the historical usage of the properties and their zoning. I have enclosed my spreadsheet, which compares our proposed commercial square footage to what would remain residential square footage. I further compared these totals to what was the usage/zoning in 1970. As you can see when you analyze the stretch of PCH from Sixth Street to Eight Street to a depth of 290 feet, the footage totals are almost identical from 1970 (or 1980) to those totals of the proposed project in 1998. Wouldn't it be great to have a quality residential development and maintain the commercial square footage we have had since 1970'? ............ and get rid of the Motel! My source for the zoning, which I have also enclosed, is a plat map from the SPA hearings in late 1980 or early 1990, showing clearly the mixed zoning that existed at the motel site during that time. I have tried to sketch the "zoning lines" as they evolved from the 70's with the overlay zone while Rod Merl was Planning Director, to the work done by Chuck Sheldon and others in the 80's to the current SPA zones. Once you have had a chance to review this material, I would be glad to sit with you, or individual members of the council to answer any questions you may have. Yours, Learned cc: Sol Blumenfeld Community Development Director • Proposed Uses in 1998 Parcels Residence Residence Pat Killen Mortise & Tenon JCC Homes Learned Lumber JCC Homes Learned Lumber Al's Top Shop Cleaners Learned Lumber Learned Lumber Learned Lumber Learned Lumber Learned Lumber Enrique DuLong Address 704 Eighth 718 Eighth 720 Eighth 729 PCH 705 PCH 705 PCH 635 PCH 619 PCH 601 PCH 725 Sixth 725 Sixth 723 Sixth 721 Sixth 709 Sixth 707 Sixth Legal Lot 9, Block 78 Lots 7-8, Block 78 Lots 5-6, Block 78 Lots 1-4, Block 78 Lot 28, Block 78 (back) Lot 28, Block 78 (front) Lot 27, Block 78 (front) Lot 27, Block 78 (front) Lot 3, Bock 78 Lot 1-2, Bock 78 Lot 4, Bock 78 Lot 5, Bock 78 Lot 6, Bock 78 Lot 7, Bock 78 Lot 8, Bock 78 Lot 8, Bock 78 Existing Uses in 1970 Parcels Residence Residence Wind Bells Music Plus Mar Vista Motel Mar Vista Motel Learned Lumber Al's Top Shop Spring Realty Learned Lumber Residence Residence Residence Residence Enrique DuLong Address 704 Eighth 718 Eighth 720 Eighth 729 PCH 705 PCH 705 PCH 635 PCH 619 PCH 601 PCH 725 Sixth 725 Sixth 723 Sixth 721 Sixth 709 Sixth 709 Sixth Legal Lot 9, Block 78 Lots 7-8, Block 78 Lots 5-6, Block 78 Lots 1-4, Block 78 Lot 27, Block 78 (back) Lot 27, Block 78 (front) Lot 27, Block 78 Lot 3, Bock 78 Lot 1-2, Bock 78 Lot 4,' Bock 78 Lot 5, Bock 78 Lot 6, Bock 78 Lot 7, Bock 78 Lot 8, Bock 78 Lot 9, Bock 78 • Use R-2 R-2 R -2/R -P Commercial Residential Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Residential Use R-2 R-2 R -2/R -P Commercial Residential Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Parking Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential RES COMM Sq. Ft Sq. Ft 2508 5016 5016 9272 15360 21760 15360 21760 3161 6570 2944 2944 2944 2944 2944 2944 Total 46204 77241 RES COMM Sq. Ft Sq. Ft 2508 5016 5016 9272 21504 15616 37120 3161 6570 2944 2944 2944 2944 2944 2944 Total 48762 74682 • • Lot Use Approx. Dist. Dint. Similar Use DateCond. from Yrum :h St. Size Cunat. Adjacent Aaroaa PCH ECUs Uses Strata • r6t. / 11 St. ..5024 SFR 1923 Fair 122-188 0 •+ Comm/E. SFR 8th St. 502 4UApt. 1986 Cood 188-254 66 Yea SFR 8th St. •4510 ' Dup. 1958 Good 254-287 122 Yes SFR IP.C.H. 0.C.H. 9270 Conn. 1948 Fair 0-122- •.C.N. Res/bad Cow/SFR 37150 Com.Rea. 1940 Fr/Pr 0-290 Res/bad - '.C.H. • 37150 Gowen. 1930 Fair 0_P.90 - ` Rea/Olid- '.C.H. 3150 Auto/Com 1940 Fair 0-90 - Yes - '.C.H. 6570 Comm.... 1973 Fair 0-90 ' - Yes Cowes. •b St. (h St. 5880 uh St. 2940 th St. 2940 th St. 2940 th St. 2940 Comm. PkL lot Comm. Pkg lot 2U/diff. 1927 1958 1959 SFR 2U/def. Fair Fair Poor Fair Fair Current Use Slope Zone Cons Flat 11-2C Yes Flat 11-2C Mo Flat R -2C Yea Flat C-3 Yes Flat C-3 Yes Flat C-3 .Yes Plat C-3 Yes Flat C-3 Tis 110-170 - Yes •• Comm. Flat C-3 • 170-200 - Res/bad Comm. Fat SPA -2 200-230 0 Com/E/N Comm. $od. SPA -2 230-260 30 Com/ Comm. Nod. R -P 260-290 60 Com/ Comm. Nod. R -P 8Tl • ST. 7.4' ri 7 o C-3. ,J661 34.6/ 17 !2 0 14 • JACS 1 40 *Inc ZONING BOUNDARY 3464 ... ISEO COMMERCIAL CORRIDO1RjSPA )ARY COMMERCIAL SINGLC-IAMILY RESIDENTIAL 7io-rAMILY RLSIDFATIAL • MULTI -FAMILY RESIDCNTIAL (these cc scree Ynit?) • I 705 N R-2 ST. eiem ��1�/J'Ir�/���o m s eo tai �/r K7r7 TOj 7-:1 la" 72� • ST: Yes Yes Yes ices Yes r NOP • 81 J.17; t.l4L/ 13 . 12 !1 X17 io16 15 ♦,,,,t•' IU3 Jed, 346/ .10 36.4/ 33 14 /170 • . . • 0 I'- . ST. 13 N, 7za J4 LS t 40 I I EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY PROPOSED COIMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY 0 a OOMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or sore units) •1 • • b35 4 V 1 bar ..7r7 ;w i'1 1L., • - • of ST �• r Jo . •8r8 ••• 13GX/ .J3 (:) 15 0 •17 to t6 15 14 • ?nor* - 411/0 366/ 3a61 93 JAGS 40 • r MOP ptcr ".' 7( . ST. c • lo LK 7P1 a EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY ••••••• PROPOSED COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY A CalMERCIAL ** • Sc—PAMILYEJ RESIDENTIAL TWO—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ULTI-FANILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) ST. 4 7, • • .• o 8TH N. ii .......... EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY •••••• PROPOSED COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY V4 COMMERCIAL «. DSINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IUD -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 0 MJLTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or sore units) .ST • $• • • EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY •••••• PROPOSED COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY 511t-7 M• COMMERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1W0 -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MJLTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or more units) 8T El 770 ST. a .fi GS EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY ...... PROPOSED COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA • BOUNDARY «. COMMERCIAL aSINGLE•-FAtAILY RESIDEtirIAL TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ElMULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three or core units) R-12 sT.. 1YVAf •••is•cv .r. FiCAxiffa , ti • • 4. A 6114 ,e* CMsiqed 51_ net, INO ale EXISTING ZONING BOUNDARY •••••• a PROPOSED COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR/SPA BOUNDARY Ca mERCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2WQ-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL * .rI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (three ac aoce units) MAY -19-98 TUE 08 : AM LEARNED LUMBER Michael Learned LUMBER PLYWOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS BUILDERS HARDWARE �0 379 0291 P_01 635 Pacific Coast Hwy., Hermosa Beach CA 90254. (310) 374-3406 fax (310) 374-3410 • El Segundo yard (310) 322-4595 fax (310) 322-9821 May 19, 1998 Stephen Burrell, City Manager Sam Edgerton, Mayor And Members of the City Council City of.Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive .Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear -Steve: Following is a letter of support from the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce. Please include the Chamber of Commerce letter with the material for the City Council Meeting on May 28, 1998. I am assuming that my letter of March 27th will also be included as a part of the Planning Commission background materials. If you recall it is the letter that shows the zoning history of the parcels. I would be glad to furnish another copy if need be. Please let me know if I can answer any questions. Yours, Lea e MAY -19-98 TUE 08 AM Michael Learned 0 379 0291 HETMO5A 5EACM CHAM[3ER OF. C MERGE May 13, 1998 Mayor Sam Edgerton and • Memb eta of the City Council City os Herrnosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re; Proposed Learned Lumber/Mar Vista Motel Site Development Projtot Dear Mayor Edgerton and Members of the City Council: The Chamber's Business Advocacy Committee and Board of Directors support the development plans for the Learned Lumber and Mar Vista Motel'sites. Following informative presentations by Michael L•earped, these groups concluded that the residential zoning of a portion .of the lumberyard .does .not necessarily mean that . the city will loose commercial square fbotage. It is our understanding that over the years, Learned Lumber has actually added commercial square fbotage to their operation by converting residential sites to commercial use. The plan to be submitted for your approval does not entail less commercial space on a square foot basis if zoning maps and uses for the past 1S to 20 years are examined. It is the Chamber's.position that the combination of increased' sales tax revenue from Learned Lumber and increased .property tax revenue from the residential units offers significant benefits to our city_ We encourage your favorable consideration of this project. Sincerely. ag.,uvr-\, Carol X Duff President & CEO 1007 Harmasa Avenue . Harrneea peach. California 90264 • (510) 570-0951 • FAX (310) 789-2684 Monday May 181 1998 14150 •• From '310 798 2594' -• Pope 11 P.02 • May 20, 1998 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Council Members, In regards to the Conditional Use Permit for a two -unit condominium at 840 15th St. approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant and the undersigned residents at 833 14th St., have reached an agreement on the following rear unit modifications and recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit with these changes: The grade at the south property line shall not be built up and shall be the same as the existing natural grade as per the survey map. The grade at the southeast corner shall be below the natural grade and will be consistent with the grade -along the rest of the south property line. The southeast corner of the property and the entire south property line shall be landscaped with mature trees to create a landscaped buffer between the adjoining properties. The rear unit shall be set back from the south property line 10 ft. at the southern most wall. * The 1st level shall be stepped back 2 ft. at the southern most wall for a total distance of 12 ft. from the south property line. * The 2nd level shall be stepped back at the southern most wall, for a total distance 14 1/2 ft. from the rear property line. A similar roof profile will be maintained at the south elevation. * The entry door is to be located at an approximate distance of 22 ft. from the rear property line and is to be recessed into the building at an angle facing the front of the property. A gate shall be installed immediately after the entrance. The west side yard set back for Unit B on the plans submitted for Planning Commission review shall be maintained. The angled south west corner on levels 1 and 2 on these plans will be implimented on the garage level. The roof deck shallnot_be.placed_on,the_south.side_of_unit_B. * The attached 3 rough sketches outline th exterior profile of the building with these changes. , Sincerely Yours, Donald Karase '' Lair'"? . ezurian As am Amlani Applicant Resident 833 14th St. Resident 833 14th St. l/ EL 101.0' 12'-0" 10,-0" • PLANTER, ELEV 104.6' 9 Tod WdZZ:Z 8665 02'Rp141 Q'-1i::ii -r ?frF/. c 71 1! 4t� by�?0 SZ2 2112 .: '°N 9NOHd 4' MIN ALL WORKS SHALL CONFOP: AU. WOOD IN DIREST CONTi PRESSURE TREATED W/MIN OR WESTERN RED CEDAR M UNDERFLOOR VENTILATION PROVIDED 0N3 SIDES OF U SNAIL BE PROVIDED TO Au ALL EXTERIOR COLORS AND PROVIDE STREET ADDRESS REQUIRED. BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE ST F BACKGROUND AU. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FA VARIATIONS; CONTRACTOR VARIATIONS TO THE OWNER INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRE MATERIAL 18 APPUED A SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL CONNECTED TO A SOUNDING THE SLEEPING AREAS. OLA2iNG IN SHOWER 8 TUB WITHIN 5 FEETOTUO OR SHC ATTIC VENTILATION EQUAL FORCED AIR UNIT PASSAGEWAY TO THE ATTIC . Nat LESS 'THA N21'WADE AN SWITCH FOR THE AMC FUR/, PROVIDE ACCESS TO ATTIC CLOTHES DRYER SHALL BE N. LIMITED TO 14' W12 ELBOWS. AU. HABITABLE ROOMS SHA L OTHER ROOMS MIN EVERY DWELLING UNIT AND MAINTAINING A ROOM TEMP; ROOMS. EAVES SHALL BE AT LEAST 3 r PLUMBING: AU. UNDERGROUND PIPING; 2% MIN SLOPE FOR DRAINA' ELECTRICAL: ELECTnICAL 3Y3TEM TO at CONVENIENCC Oat I e IN & ANU DASEMENTS SHALL bk t GARAGES: ONE HOUR RETE nr313I IVE F SUhrOITTINQ f ME DWELLING: GARAGE WALLS LkS8 THAN ODNE111UC.TMON WIT! I NQ GY: RR"OLQS1NG T1011T FITTIN( AHALL FIE PROVIDED, OPENABLE WINDOW IIETWE E APPLIANCES IN GARAGE RHA SUFFIQ EN I . PROVIDE APPROVf03Art f7 ALL GARAGES SHALL HAvr A PROVIDE MINIMUM OF Two b �N I dEZI : wOa a • • FOR INCLUSION IN CITY COUNCIL PACKAGE FOR MAY 28th, 1998 MEETING May 19, 1998 Community Development Department Hermosa Beach City Hall Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 te.._._ MAY 1998 CITY OFFICE MAY f 1998 COM. C;r:v. CEPT,. Re: Review of Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #21493; for 2 unit Condominium at 840 15th Street. This letter will serve as notice that the above noted Condominium Development will create a potentially unsafe condition to the neighbors living adjacent to the property at 840 15`h Street. We, the neighbors, are concerned with our safety, security and privacy issues that this potential development levies on our single-family residences. It will be only a matter of time before the following unsafe conditions of this development will impact one or more residents. Front Door Location • The Front Door/Main Entry (elevated threshold @ 106') is located at the back of rear unit. • This creates easy/unlimited access for solicitors, strangers and non-residents to enter adjoining backyards. • Intruders can easily step over low rear walls creating huge security risk. • Small children and pets will no longer be able to be left unattended in private backyards. Proposed Solution: Move Front door to Front of unit. (*5/17/98 Developer has indicated front door will be adjusted to face Eastside rear wall verses South rear wall. This modification leaves door in exact same location; with same potential safety issue.) Elevated Rear Main Walkway • Rear access walkway elevated. • Walkway provides direct access to Front door located at back of house. • Walkway is 4 ft above south neighbor's grade. And pedestrian traffic is visible waist high above 6ft property wall. • Constant traffic flow presents a nuisance, privacy and security issue same as above. Proposed Solution: Eliminate elevated rear walkway. No increase in grade. (*5/17/98 Developer has indicated that walkway will be at grade and not elevated.) Southern Facade Step Back & Building Setback (Re: April 21,1998, Planning Commission) • Peter Tucker requested Southern facade to be stepped back on all levels. • Also, Commissioners strongly proposed entire rear unit be pushed forward and away from property line wall. • 10% of Property length would be 14.5ft rear setback. • Fire Code outlines a minimum of 10 ft setback for commercial property. 7 ft setback is an extreme Fire Hazard for adjoining Wood Shingled R1 Residence. Proposed Solution: Mandate a two to three foot setback for each level incorporating a larger rear setback. (i.e. 13ft, 15ft and 17 ft from property line wall.) (*5/17/98 neighbors proposed a 13ft setback at grade level with steppe back design, Developer indicated he would review) Property Wall & Site Grading :9 • • • Property Line wall is ours and is NOT a retaining wall. Not structurally sufficient for grade buildup. • Present grade at 840 15h Street is 2 ft higher with soil resting against wall. • No further increase to be permitted as originally requested by developer. • Stress and Drainage needs to be addressed and incorporated into plan. Soil against present non - retaining wall is a structural hazard. Proposed Solution: Present soil buildup to be removed and adjusted per our Civil Engineer's requirements. (diagram attached). Installation of culvert and drain. ("5/17/98 Developer has indicated no grade increase will occur but will use existing higher grade of 102') Mature Trees/Landscapinq (Re: April 21,1998 Planning Commission Recommendation) • Mature Trees to be planted the length of southern property line for visual intrusion relief. • Definition of Mature Trees should meet professional landscaping standards and requirements. • Absence of dense landscape barrier causes security, safety and privacy issues for all neighboring backyards. Proposed Solution: Require minimum of 48" box tree with 20 - 25 ft. height. Species to be identified and confirmed. The issues of Safety, Security, Privacy and Quality of Life need to be addressed regarding this development. The project raises multiple issues for surrounding neighbors. The present development boom in Hermosa will obviously impact many single family homeowners. With the present rules and allowances, it is obvious that they too will come to experience the Hell we've known since February 1998. Regulations and code adjustments need to be made by the City Government. Ganges must be instituted to protect the present homeowners and their property. k y for your time and consideration. slamAml ni r L uren nan (C • sINImaVrr1&K2i !6wri.1111/-rT21-1 / ,0 . i;t m0 0iAsisSTERBinEDmFR00.6-_ _ mo laI m ey1Alli.6 _ mon afrieili imvol rra4,44) 1111111 IIIMI 111.9.21Pi VOW * POW IkTIM *sae P4� iiiiiiiimill , . _‘ ,„....0 ...., 1ST FLOOR 1191.75 S.F. 7_ CIL T___1717_. tI _C-7_n_111T -IL ft1 -70 C 'NI. 1 T i..jrvJ • mn 1 J C t int Imam mei 11w�1�1 maw w 121i PAS law I avit .ter.• v G ..ROOM_ VOL CLG. AP to t: ..DEC 105. :L 119.6_.__ L L__ KIT( 4 • UNF-0-iN _.. _ - - - t E) r'7 May 18, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 1998 SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF CONDOMINIUM 98-6 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 98-7 VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP # 21493 LOCATION: 840 15th St. APPLICANT: Don Karasevicz 840 15th Street REQUEST: TO ALLOW A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM Recommendations To sustain the Planning Commission's approval of the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map with the provision that the project be developed in conformance with the attached revised plans submitted and dated May 21, 1998. Background PROJECT INFORMATION GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Residential ZONING: R -2B LOT SIZE: 5,670 Square Feet EXISTING USE: Single Family Dwelling PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2,955 and 3,007 square feet ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorically Exempt, Pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3(b) and 15315 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines with the finding that the project is in an area with available services. At their April 21, 1998 meeting, the Planning Commission approved a two unit condominium on the subject property subject to the Conditions of Approval as noted in the attached Resolution 98-20. At their April 28, 1998 meeting, The City Council, after hearing the concerns of the property owners adjacent to the subject property on the south side, directed that this proposed project be reconsidered before the City Council. 9 1 • Analysis The proposed project consists of two detached units; both units have 5 bedrooms, 2 3/4 and 1/2 baths. The dwelling units are two stories above basement level garages and includes balconies and roof decks adjoining the family room/kitchen area. The buildings are designed in a contemporary architecture with some Mediterranean elements The concern the property owners adjacent to the south of the subject property had with the proposed plans approved by the Planning Commission was loss of privacy to their home and yard as a result of the proposed project having only a 5 foot south setback and being almost 30 feet in height. The Planning Commission in an effort to mitigate this problem required a seven foot setback with stepbacks to the upper floors and a row of trees along the south property line to buffer adjacent neighbors. Since the Planning Commission approval of the proposed project, revised plans have been submitted, which are mutually acceptable to both the property owners to the south (complainants) and the project developer. (Please see attached letter.) The revised plans have been modified as follows: • The grade at the south property line will remain at existing elevation and the grade at the southeast property line will be maintained at the same elevation. • The south setback at the basement level will be ten feet; the first story will be stepped back an additional two feet (twelve foot setback); and the second story will be stepped back an additional two and a half feet (fourteen and a half foot setback). • The south dwelling unit main entry door will be relocated twenty- two feet from the south property line and will be reoriented and recessed at an angle facing north. A gate will installed to the south of the main entry. • The southwest corner of the basement level will maintain the same orientation as the floors above. • The roof deck will remain on the northwest corner of the southern dwelling unit to enhance privacy to the neighboring property to the south. Sol Blumenfeld, Community De Concur: Steve City cn986ca n-• or lopment Department 19. 2 Attachments 1. Resolution Sustaining Planning Commission 2. Revised plans 3. Planning Commission Resolution 4. Planning Commission Minutes 5. Correspondence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, AND VESTING PARCEL MAP 21493 AT 840 15TH ST., LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 25 HEFNER FIORINI ALLEN TRACT. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on May 28, 1998, to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve the subject Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map and to consider oral and written testimony on the matter, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map at their meeting of April 21, 1998, and approved the request subject to conditions as contained in Planning Commission Resolution 98-20, and; WHEREAS, after considering the decision of the Planning Commission and their record of decision, and the testimony at the public hearing, the City Council agrees with the Planning Commission, and agrees with the findings and the conditions contained within Planning Commission Resolution 96-44, which are incorporated herein by reference; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY SUSTAIN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH IN P.C. RESOLUTION 98-20 AND WITH THE PROVISION THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONFORMS TO THE REVISED PLANS DATED AND RECEIVED MAY 21, 1998. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1998, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY cN9820cA 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • P.C. RESOLUTION 98-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #21493 FOR A TWO (2) -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, AT 840 15TH STREET AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 25 HEFFNER, FIORINI, ALLEN TRACT The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows: Section 1. An application was filed by Don Karasevicz, owners of real property located at 840-642 15th Street, seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #21493 for a Two (2) Unit Condominium project. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed de novo public hearing to consider the subject application on April 21, 1998, at which testimony and evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission Section 3. Based on evidence received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following factual findings: 1. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing 2 single-family residential dwellings and develop the property with a two unit residential condominium project. 2. The subject property proposed for condominium development contains 5,670 square feet, is designated Medium Density Residential on the General Plan Map, an designated R -2B on the Zoning Map. Section 4. Based on the foregoing factual findings, the Planning Commission makes the following findings pertaining to the application for a Precise Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map: 1. The map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans; 2. The site is zoned R -2B and is physically suitable for the type and density of proposed development 3. The subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 • • 4. The subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; 5. Design of the proposed subdivision is compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City's General Plan, and is compatible with the immediate environment; 6. The project, as conditioned, will conform to all zoning and condominium laws and criteria and will be compatible with neighboring residential properties; 7. The project is Categorically Exempt from the requirement for an environmental assessment, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15303(b) and 15315 with the finding that the project is in an area with available services Section 5. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the subject Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan, Tentative Parcel Map subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. The development and continued use of the property shall be in conformance with submitted plans received and reviewed by the Commission at their meeting of April 21, 1998. Any minor modification shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Community Development Director. a) Height of the project shall be reduced to comply with the maximum 30 foot height limit. b) The minimum front yard setback shall be 17 feet and the rear setback shall be a minimum of 7 feet. c) A minimum of 50% of the ground level open space shall open to the sky. d) The southern elevation shall have more articulation and where possible shall step back and the intrusion of the fireplace shall be reduced. 2. Decorative paving shall be provided in the driveway subject to approval of the 19 Community Development Director. 20 3. The project shall meet all requirements of the Condominium Ordinance. 21 a) Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions in compliance with the Condominium Ordinance shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for 22 review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 23 b) Proof of recordation of approved CC & R's shall be submitted to the Community Development Director six (6) months after recordation of the Final Map 24 25 c) Requirements of Section 7.2-6(G) shall be shown on structural plans and reviewed at the time of Building Division plan check 26 27 28 29 S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • 4. There shall be compliance with all requirements of the Public Works Department and Fire Department. 5. Two copies of a final landscaping plan indicating size, type, and quantity of plant materials to be planted shall be submitted to the Community Development Department, Planning Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. a) An automatic landscape sprinkler system shall be provided, and shall be shown on plans. (Building Permits are required) b) At least two specimen size trees (minimum 36" box size) shall be provided with at least one in the front yard. c) A row trees to buffer the adjacent property to the south shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 6. Architectural treatment shall be as shown on building elevations and site and floor plans. Any modification shall require approval by the Community Development Director. a) Precise building height shall be reviewed at the time of plan check, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 7. Any satellite dish antennas and/or similar equipment shall comply with the requirements of Section 17.46.240 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Conduit shall be installed in each unit for cable television. 9. The address of each condominium unit shall be conspicuously displayed on the street side of the building with externally or internally lit numbers and the method for illumination shall be shown on plans. All addresses shall be displayed at the main entry to the development. Addressing numbering and display subject to approval by the Community Development Department. 10. Roll -up Automatic garage.doors shall be installed on all garage door openings. 11. Two copies of final construction plans, including site, elevation and floor plans, which are consistent with the conditions of approval of this conditional use permit, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division for consistency with Planning Commission approved plans prior to the submittal to the Building Division for Plan Check. a. The site plan and, floor plans shall be corrected such that scaled drawing accurately correspond with noted dimensions. 12. Prior to the submittal of structural plans to the Building Division for Plan Check an Acceptance of Conditions affidavit shall be filed with the Planning Division of the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Community Development Department stating that the applicant/property owner is aware of, and agrees to accept, all of the conditions of this grant 13. The Conditional Use Permit, and Precise Development Plan shall be null and void eighteen months from the date of approval unless building permits have been obtained, and approval of the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map shall become null and void twenty-four months from the date of approval unless the map is finaled and the project implemented. The applicant may apply in writing for an extension of time to the Planning Commission prior to the dates of expiration. 14. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a formal notification letter shall be sent to abutting property owners within 100 feet regarding the commencement of construction date. a. The form of the letter and the, list of abutting property owners to whom notice shall be sent shall be provided by the Planning Division of the Community Development . b. A building permit will not be issued until at least five (5) days have elapsed from mailing of the notification letter via certified mail to all abutting property owners. c. Building permits will be issued when the applicant provides receipts of certified mail to the Community Development Department VOTE: AYES: Comm. Perrotti, Merl, Pizer, Chmn. Tucker NOES: none ABSTAIN: Comm. Schwartz ABSENT: none CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 98-20 is a true and complete record of the action taken b the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular mee 'i g +f Apri121, 19 Peter Tucker, C airman Date 7 conr986 ecretary MOTION . ' _ • mm. Perrotti, Seconded by Comm. Pizer, to ADOPT the proposed Res • luti n and that the Co •n has made the appropriate findings based on the steepn- • the lot and the lot size. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Comm. Merl days Comm. Perrotti, Merl, P None Comm. Schwartz Chmn. Tucker that as with all Commission items, it is appealable to the ouncil within 10 15. CON 98-6/PDP 98-7 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #21493 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 840 15TH STREET. Staff Recommended Action: To approve said request. Michael Schubach stated that a 12 -foot front yard setback with required garage setback is proposed. He said that previously the Commission was concerned with consistency with the existing neighborhood. Some other issues include an overhang over the open space which needs to be adjusted and required changes for project landscaping are necessary. He commented that one issue is the location of a front door toward the rear of the property and also the issue of having so much lot frontage in driveway area. He noted that while the driveway does provide two additional guest parking spaces, it also makes three-fourths of the front yard driveway. Chmn. Tucker opened the public hearing at 9:54 p.m. Elizabeth Srour, 1001 6th Street, Manhattan Beach, representing Don Karasevicz, said the way the project has been designed to address the parking issue with seven spaces provided on the site, and there is an intention to create two freestanding homes with some very attractive landscaping. She also commented on the setback, saying the project has two detached buildings with a very generous 25 -foot corridor between them, which will be very beneficial to the properties to the east and the west. She also commented on there being no decks or doors off the southerly orientation, which helps to preserve the privacy of the properties to the south. Don Karasevicz, 840 15th Street, spoke about the severe parking problem and the support that exists for having more off-street parking. He also said the situation that precipitates the unusually large setback is the ocean view. He said his neighbors to the immediate rear expressed some concern about a duplex which had been approved that would have windows facing their property, and he said the south elevation on Unit B is lacking windows in order to avoid a privacy issue. Lauren Gazarian, 833 14th Street, introduced a packet of information and a site rendering, and she brought up the issue of the location of the front door, stressing the foot traffic problem and a P.C. Minutes 4-21-98 • • security risk. She also stressed allowable distance for emergency vehicle access. She said some additional landscaping would help soften the facade, and the grade level should be the same on both sides of the wall. Aslam Amlani, 833 14t Street, asked the Commissioners to investigate the grading. He also said there should be trees to buffer the property. He said this is a three-story structure. Rebuttal Elizabeth Srour, 1001 6th Street, said the applicant is willing to work with Staff to increase the landscaping across the rear of the property. She said the applicant found it important to create two separate dwelling units and to maintain a view corridor. Chmn. Tucker closed the public hearing at 10:29 p.m. Discussion Comm. Perrotti said he agrees with Staff on the setback of 19 feet and that there should be more landscaping in the rear, including mature trees. Comm. Merl said he didn't feel that the 17 -foot setback was untoward. Comm. Pizer said there is no room for rear landscaping with the setback, and he proposed allowing a 17 -foot setback and more rear yard. Chmn. Tucker expressed concern for the southerly residents with an eight -foot high wall and discussed the position of the front door. MOTION by Comm. Merl, Seconded by Comm. Perrotti, to MOVE the Staff recommendations plus the modification that the front setback be 17 but that those two feet be completely picked up in the rear as an additional rear setback and direction to Staff to work with the developer to increase the landscaping particularly the addition of mature trees for screening purposes, and Staff work with the developer on the further articulation and to where possible the stepping back of the rear portion of the rear unit and reduce the intrusion of the fireplace into the setback and articulation of the side elevations to provide more relief on the linear wall. AYES: Comm. Perrotti, Merl, Pizer, Chmn. Tucker NOES: None ABSENT: Comm. Schwartz ABSTAIN: None 98-2 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTSIDE SE .. IN CONJUNCTI WASH. A COFFEE HOUSE AT 509 PIER Staff Recommended Action: Direc rove said request. E, ESPRESSO enfeld said the business owner is now desiring to make some further . to e proposed plan which would include an outside seating area and basically that would be a 9 to P.C. Minutes 4-21-98 • • 840 15th St. Hermosa Beach, C 90254 May 21, 1998 Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Council Members, The attached letter of agreement between myself and the owners of the adjoining property at 833 14.;:h St., Hermosa Beach outlines modifications to the Conditional Use Permit ar proved by the Planning Commission in addition to changes made to plans sut mitted on May 21, 1998 for the May 28, 1998 hearing. I and my architect will attend the May 28 hearing and will be available to answer any questions however please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely Yours, Donald Karasevicz (310)376-7621 Phone (310)251-2593 Cellular to RECEIVED MAY 2 1 1998 COM. DEV. DEPT • • May 20, 1998 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Council Members, In regards to the Conditional Use Permit for a two -unit condominium at 840 15th St. approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant and the undersigned residents at 833 14th St., have reached an agreement on the following rear unit modifications and recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit with these changes: The grade at the south property line shall not be built up and shall be the same as the existing natural grade as per the survey map. The grade at the southeast corner shall be below the natural grade and will be consistent with the grade along the rest of the south property line. The southeast corner of the property and the entire south property line shall be landscaped with mature trees to create a landscaped buffer between the adjoining properties. The rear unit shall be set back from the south property line 10 ft. at the southern most wall. * The 1st level shall be stepped back 2 ft. at the southern most wall for a total distance of 12 ft. from the south property line. * The 2nd level shall be stepped back at the southern most wall, for a total distance 14 1/2 ft. from the rear property line. A similar roof profile will be maintained at the south elevation. * The entry door is to be located at an approximate distance of 22 ft. from the rear property line and is to be recessed into the building at an angle facing the front of the property. A gate shall be installed immediately after the entrance. The west side yard set back for Unit B on the plans submitted for Planning Commission review shall be maintained. The angled south west corner on levels 1 and 2 on these plans will be implimented on the garage level. The roof deck shall not be placed on the south side of unit B. * The attached 3 rough sketches outline th- exterior profile of the building with these changes. Sincerely Yours, Donald Karase Applicant 19 Lag", . ezurian As am Amlani Resident 833 14th St. Resident 833 14th St. • l/ 10%0" ...19 tOd WdZZ:Z 8661 0Z'FeW Nc~' 73 J. 0401" 0 ‘J iv ri'vjk 4' MIN ALL WORKS SHALL CONFOR: AU. W000 IN DIREV CONTE PRESSURE TREATED MAIN OR WESTERN RED CEDAR M UNDERFLOOR VENTILATION PROVIDED ON 3 SIDES OF T SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ALL ALL EXTERIOR COLORS ANO PROVIDE STREET ADDRESS REQUIRED. BUILDING ADDRESS NUM3E AND LEGIBLE FROM THE 3T F BAO(GAOUNO ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO Fa VARIATIONS; CONTRACTOR VARIATIONS TO THE OWNEr. INSPECTIONS ARE REOuIRE MATERIAL I8 APPLIED A SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL CONNECTED TO A SOUNDIN( THE SLEEPING AREAS. GLAZING IN SLOWER b TUR WITHIN 5 FEETO TU8 OR 9HC ATTIC VENTILATION EQUAL' FORCED AIR UNIT PASSAGEWAY TO THE ATTIC NOT LESS THAN 21' WIDE AN SWITCH FOR THE ATTIC Fu Pt PROVIDE ACCESS TO ATTIC CLOTHES DRYER SHALL 8E LIMITEOTO 14' W!2 ELBOWS AU. HABITABLE ROOMS SHA 7' li',AI 1 OTHER ROOMS MIN EVERY DWELLING UNIT AND MAINTAINING A ROOM TEMP; ROOMS. EAVES SHALL BE AT LEAST 3 PLUMBING: ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING 2% MIN SLOPE FOR DRAINA ELECTRICAL: ELECTf1CAL3Y3TeM TO et cONVENIENCC OULt I tl IN Be ANU DA3EMF_NTS SHALL 81: c CIARAOES: ONE HOUR FIRF DC310 I IVE F SUPPORTINQ I1IEDWCLLINI GARAGE WALLS Elba TI UN OONO111UCTION WITH NO 01,: Sig" ciAzirlnow Multi( MALL BE PROVIDED. OP ENABLE WINDOW BETWE APPLIANCES IN GARAGE Si IA SUPFICIENI. PROVIOE APPROVED 3A -t ,' 7 ALL GARAGES SHALL HAVE- PROVIDE AVEPROVIDE MINIMUM OF Two 6 VV00 SZ£ 01£ .: 'ON 3NOHd DNI U08 : WO -t3+ • • ., ---- ..Trastmosmarnmesommes illP Ca 411 . ri INPI tillfio . is J ;or •WIP' legill Nil al li owl Kttw..,i1 'pup UM OW 301 grt: ti UN saw kavelt ite' mos soma r . sr' 1ST FLOOR 1191.75 S.F. 1,3 111 7- •70 _CC 44E- • - -- VOL CLG. .r»ri stun maxi • fr ,:L 119.6__ h L f . 105.E KIT( 0- ) /v :: 7"-- 'u l c� �E • • FOR INCLUSION IN CITY COUNCIL PACKAGE FOR MAY 28th, 1998 MEETING May 19, 1998 Community Development Department Hermosa Beach City Hall Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ED MAY i i 1998 CFTY F MAY ` 1998 COM. [acv. DE.PT.. Re: Review of Conditional Use Permit, Precise Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #21493; for 2 unit Condominium at 840 15th Street. This letter will serve as notice that the above noted Condominium Development will create a potentially unsafe condition to the neighbors living adjacent to the property at 840 15th Street. We, the neighbors, are concerned with our safety, security and privacy issues that this potential development levies on our single-family residences. It will be only a matter of time before the following unsafe conditions of this development will impact one or more residents. Front Door Location • The Front Door/Main Entry (elevated threshold @ 106') is located at the back of rear unit. • This creates easy/unlimited access for solicitors, strangers and non-residents to enter adjoining backyards. • Intruders can easily step over low rear walls creating huge security' risk. • Small children and pets will no longer be able to be left unattended in private backyards. Proposed Solution: Move Front door to Front of unit. (*5/17/98 Developer has indicated front door will be adjusted to face Eastside rear wall verses South rear wall. This modification leaves door in exact same location; with same potential safety issue.) Elevated Rear Main Walkway • Rear access walkway elevated. • Walkway provides direct access to Front door located at back of house. • Walkway is 4 ft above south neighbor's grade. And pedestrian traffic is visible waist high above 6ft property wall. • Constant traffic flow presents a nuisance, privacy and security issue same as above. Proposed Solution: Eliminate elevated rear walkway. No increase in grade. (*5/17/98 Developer has indicated that walkway will be at grade and not elevated.) Southern Facade Step Back & Building Setback (Re: April 21,1998, Planning Commission) • Peter Tucker requested Southern facade to be stepped back on all levels. • Also, Commissioners strongly proposed entire rear unit be pushed forward and away from property line wall. • 10% of Property length would be 14.5ft rear setback. • Fire Code outlines a minimum of 10 ft setback for commercial property. 7 ft setback is an extreme Fire Hazard for adjoining Wood Shingled R1 Residence. Proposed Solution: Mandate a two to three foot setback for each level incorporating a larger rear setback. (i.e. 13ft, 15ft and 17 ft from property line wall.) (*5/17/98 neighbors proposed a 13ft setback at grade level with steppe back design, Developer indicated he would review) Property Wall & Site Grading :a rs • • • Property Line wall is ours and is NOT a retaining wall. Not structurally sufficient for grade buildup. • Present grade at 840 15`h Street is 2 ft higher with soil resting against wall. • No further increase to be permitted as originally requested by developer. • Stress and Drainage needs to be addressed and incorporated into plan. Soil against present non - retaining wall is a structural hazard. Proposed Solution: Present soil buildup to be removed and adjusted per our Civil Engineer's requirements. (diagram attached). Installation of culvert and drain. (*5/17/98 Developer has indicated no grade increase will occur but will use existing higher grade of 102') Mature Trees/Landscaping (Re: April 21,1998 Planning Commission Recommendation) • Mature Trees to be planted the length of southern property line for visual intrusion relief. • Definition of Mature Trees should meet professional landscaping standards and requirements. • Absence of dense landscape barrier causes security, safety and privacy issues for all neighboring backyards. Proposed Solution: Require minimum of 48" box tree with 20 - 25 ft. height. Species to be identified and confirmed. The issues of Safety, Security, Privacy and Quality of Life need to be addressed regarding this development. The project raises multiple issues for surrounding neighbors. The present development boom in Hermosa will obviously impact many single family homeowners. With the present rules and allowances, it is obvious that they too will come to experience the Hell we've known since February 1998. Regulations and code adjustments need to be made by the City Government. anges must be instituted to protect the present homeowners and their property. k y for your time and consideration. slam Amlani Lduren rian (C • t`sF u,' • 2j1 MAX 1°A) lt,1' t') `7014) 7 • /g • May 20, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of..the Hermosa Beach City Council May 28, 1998 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STUDY 6TH -WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Recommendation: That the City Council direct staff as deemed appropriate. Background: The City Council previously directed staff to proceed with a traffic study to limit 6th Street traffic in the block between Ardmore Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway, by closing 6th Street to westbound traffic west of the commercial zone. Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LL & G) prepared the attached traffic study Analysis: The study area included 6th Street between Ardmore Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway and adjacent residential streets ( 8th, 6th, 5th and 2nd Streets). The existing and proposed conditions were examined using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of analysis and the incremental daily traffic increase methodology developed by the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to determine: 1. The volume to capacity (v/c) ratio and level of service (LOS) of 8th, 5th and 2nd Street intersections' 2. The percentage of redistribution of traffic expected with reconfiguration of 6th Street2 Conclusions of Study: The proposed reconfiguration of 6th Street (closing 6th Street to west bound traffic west of the commercial zone) results in the following traffic impacts3: • 17.9% increase to daily traffic added to 6th St. east of Ardmore Ave. (1,203 vehicles to 1,418 vehicles) & 13.1% decrease to daily traffic added to 6th St. west of PCH (1635 vehicles to 1,420 vehicles). • 8th, 5th and 2nd Streets west of PCH increased traffic added respectively with 4.4%, 14.9% and 4.3% • AM/PM peak V/C and LOS not significantly impacted at signalized 8th, 5th 2nd /PCH intersection • Ardmore at 6th Street unsignalized intersection is not significantly impacted. • Ardmore north of 6th St. and south of 6th Street increased traffic respectively with 5.0% and 13.6% • Ardmore north of 2nd St. impacted with 8% traffic volume increase. Sol Blume ld, irector Community ) evelopment Department Concur: Stephen ' urrell, City Manager Notes 1. Volume capacity (v/c) is the ratio of the volume of traffic to the capacity of the roadway. Level of Service (LOS) is the standard used for the amount of traffic delay over a 24 hour period for an intersection. a % increase in VC or drop below LOS D Level is generally considered a significant impact 2. L.A. DOT methodology used to assess the percent of traffic expected to increase on surrounding streets 3. Table I - Traffic Study Attachments: 1. Traffic Study • • U■ r UM M M M— INN 1= r w= ■■I MI N • TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 6TH STREET ONE-WAY EASTBOUND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TO ARDMORE AVENUE Hermosa Beach, California Prepared for: Mr. Sol Blumenfeld City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Prepared by: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 234 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 400 Pasadena, California 91101 Phone: (626) 796-2322 Fax: (626) 792-0941 March 13, 1998 1-972704-1 I'9IFMMOlrMMMMMIMI LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS ENGINEERS & PLANNERS • TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 234 East Colorado Blvd, Suite 400 • Pasadena, California 91101 Phone: 626 796-2322 • Fax: 626 792-0941 March 13, 1998 Mr. Sol Blumenfeld City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Subject: Analysis of Proposed One -Way Eastbound Traffic Operation 6th Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Ardmore Avenue Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: Pursuant to your authorization, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, is pleased to submit this analysis of the proposed one-way eastbound operation of traffic in the block between Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Ardmore Avenue, in the City of Hermosa Beach. Briefly, we conclude that daily traffic, redistributed as a result of the one-way operation of 6th Street in the eastbound direction, is expected to significantly impact the adjacent local residential streets which have signalized intersections with PCH. However, the anticipated change in traffic pattern is not expected to significantly impact the signalized PCH intersections, nor the stop controlled intersections on Ardmore Avenue. Study Area Figure 1, at the rear of this report, shows the location of 6th Street and it's relation to the surrounding network of streets. To determine the potential impact of changing 6th Street from two-way to one- way eastbound between PCH and Ardmore Avenue, traffic on the three adjacent residential streets (8th Street, 5th Street and 2nd Street), which have signalized intersections with PCH, have been analyzed. Existing Conditions Figure 2, illustrates existing conditions on 8th Street, 6th Street, 5th Street, 2nd Street, and Ardmore Avenue. Shown are street width, effective travel way (street width less parking), general parking conditions, traffic controls, and current 24 hour (two-way) traffic volumes. Philip M. Linscott, P.E. (Ret. ) lack M. Greenspan, P.E. William A. Law, P.E. (Ret.) Paul W. Wilkinson, P.E. John P. Keating, P.E. David S. Shender, P.E. Costa Mesa - 714 641-1587 • San Diego - 619 299-3090 • Las Vegas - 702 451-1920 • An LG2WB Company 1 ' From Figure 2, it can be seen that 6th Street is 28 feet wide with parking allowed on both sides of LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Mr. Sol Blumenfeld March 13, 1998 Page Two the street. Where conditions (such as driveway spacing) permit vehicles to be parked opposite one another, the travel way available for two-way traffic is effectively reduced to 12 feet. The 6th Street intersection with PCH is unsignalized, and eastbound traffic is restricted to right -turn only at PCH. Current 24 hour traffic volumes (two-way) on 6th Street are 1,635 vehicles west of PCH and 1,203 ' vehicles east of Ardmore Avenue. The portion 6th Street immediately west of PCH contains commercial uses, with the most prominent use being Learned Lumber on the north side of the street. ' Existing AM and PM peak commute hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3 (AM peak hour) and Figure 4 (PM peak hour). Looking at Figure 3, it is significant to note that in the AM peak commute hour, 22 (61 percent) of the 36 vehicles eastbound on 6th Street made an illegal left -turn ' onto northbound PCH. Traffic Redistribution The redistribution of westbound 24 hour traffic on 6th Street to the adjacent residential streets is shown on Figure 5. Existing two-way traffic by direction, and anticipated one-way traffic on 6th street is shown on Figure 6. Daily traffic on 6th Street east of Ardmore Avenue is projected to increase from 1,203 vehicles (two-way) to 1,670 vehicles (one-way eastbound). West of PCH, daily traffic is expected to show a decrease in volume from 1,635 vehicles (two-way) to 1,168 vehicles (one-way eastbound). Traffic Analysis Residential Streets Projected daily residential street traffic,with 6th Street one-way eastbound between Ardmore Avenue and PCH is presented in Table 1, following the figures at the rear of this report. Table 1 shows existing 24 hour traffic volume, redistributed volume caused by the change from two-way I traffic on 6th Street to one-way eastbound traffic, the resulting projected volume, and percent increase in traffic. Also shown on Table 1 is the expected impact on 8th Street, 6th Street, 5th Street, 2nd Street, and Ardmore Avenue. Since the City of Hermosa Beach does not presently have a residential street traffic criteria to identify significant impact, we have employed the incremental daily traffic increase methodology developed by the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation (See Note 4 on Table 1). With the exception of 6th Street west of PCH, all of the adjacent residential streets, plus 6th Street east of Ardmore Avenue, are expected to be significantly impacted as a result of going from two-way traffic to one-way eastbound traffic on 6th Street. 1 1 Pacific Coast Highway As requested, we have also conducted a volume -to -capacity (v/c) and Level of Service (LOS) I analysis of the signalized intersections of 8th Street, 5th Street and 2nd Street with PCH, using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of analysis. The results of this analysis is presented in Table 2 (detailed ICU analysis worksheets follow Table 2). To identify significant traffic impact, I we have applied the same impact criteria that has been employed in prior Hermosa Beach traffic analyses; I LOS D (signalized) v/c = 0.81-0.90 Significant Impact = v/c increase greater than 0.020 LOS E/F (signalized) v/c = 0.91 or greater Significant Impact = v/c increase greater than 0.010 LOS D/E (unsignalized) Significant Impact = Drop LOS by one level IFrom Table 2, it can be seen that the change from two-way to one-way eastbound traffic on 6th Street is not expected to produce a significant impact on the adjacent signalized PCH intersections. IArdmore Avenue Also shown on the lower half of Table 2, is the results of the analysis of Ardmore Avenue traffic, 1 using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) for unsignalized intersections (detailed HCS analysis worksheets follow the ICU worksheets at the end of this report). Examination of the table shows that the change from two-way traffic to one-way eastbound traffic on 6th Street is not expected to result in a significant traffic impact. Conclusions LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Mr. Sol Blumenfeld March 13, 1998 Page Three Daily traffic redistributed as a result of changing two-way traffic to one-way eastbound traffic on 6th Street between PCH and Ardmore Avenue can be expected to significantly impact the adjacent residential streets which have signalized intersections with PCH (8th Street, 5th Street, and 2nd Street). 1 • Daily traffic added to 6th Street east of Ardmore Avenue, can be expected to result in a significant residential street traffic impact, increasing daily traffic by 38 percent. 1 • Analysis of AM and PM peak commute hour traffic at the signalized intersections of 8th Street, 5th Street, and 2nd Street with PCH, show that the change from two-way traffic to one-way eastbound traffic on 6th Street is not expected to result in significant traffic impact at these locations. • Analysis of the unsignalized intersections on Ardmore Avenue show that one-way eastbound traffic on 6th Street is not expected to result in significant traffic impact. 1 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Mr. Sol Blumenfeld March 13, 1998 Page Four Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers welcomes the opportunity to prepare this analysis of one-way eastbound traffic operation on 6th Street between Ardmore Avenue and PCH. Should there be any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers ck M. Greenspan, P.E. rincipal attachments 2704.02 •19 _ tam- • \gm - \liw- \Ill" \ 16" $1 • 41 \lasiA sl PEACH TIER LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN MAP SOURCE. THOMAS BROS. GUIDE i.9 7 NOT TO SCALE 1 VICINITY MAP 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH m -o �► -o n>1a, A 0 z 0 = SIGNAL = ALL WAY STOP (AWS) i = STOP SIGN NP = NO PARKING P = PARKING XX _ TRAVEL WAY (2 -WAY) XX STREET WIDTH XXXX = 24-HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME (* = ESTIMATED) NOTE: Travelway (2 -Way) = Street width - 8' for parking (where permitted) 8TH PLACE 8TH STREET 20 28 -o 7TH STREET w CO Oa rn 1 1203 O • 'IV z N co coO -o �► -o -o 12 28 20 28 22 30 NP P 611-1 STREET 4448 1635 0 lk P F P 51-1-1 STREET P 411-1 STREET 3RD STREET 2ND STREET 1ST PLACE NP P NP 2194 3050* rn • 8TH 7TH 0 4TH 2 ) 0) 6TH 5TH 1R9 2NO LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN E H 'G 11 E E R S NOT TO SCALE 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH LINSCOTT LAW Si GREENSPAN ENGINEERS NOT TO SCALE 3 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM PEAK HOUR 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH 0:\JOB_FILE\2704\DWG\P2704E4 LDP 03/11/98 DON LINSCOT LAW & T GREENSPAN ENG 0 FIEIERS NOT TO SCALE 4 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES PM PEAK HOUR 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEER; NOT TO SCALE 5 24-HOUR TRAFFIC REDISTRIBUTION 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH 0 494 8TH PLACE 8TH STREET 7TH STREET 4 AU � A 728 -65 262 Nrr 6TH STREET 5TH STREET 4TH STREET 3RD STREET 2ND STREET 1ST PLACE 7V A 54im 8TH 7TH 0 4TH N 6TH 5TH P 200 4 —541 662 1203 Total 6TH STREET --1008 627r 1635 Total m EXISTING 24-HOUR ONE WAY 662 +1008 1670 6TH STREET 627 g +541 1168 F n 2 WITH ONE-WAY EASTBOUND G \JOB_FILE \27D4 \DWG\P 2 LINSCOTT LAW Si GREENSPAN 6 24 HOUR TRAFFIC WITH 6TH STREET ONE-WAY EASTBOUND 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH E H G V N E I 6? 5 NOT TO SCALE 1 • • 1 1 1 t Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Table 1 PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL STREET TRAFFIC 6TH STREET (ONE-WAY EASTBOUND) BETWEEN ARDMORE AVENUE & PCH 6TH Street Hermosa Beach 03/13/98 LOCATION EXISTING VOLUME REDISTRIBUTED VOLUME PROJECTED VOLUME PERCENT INCREASE IMPACT NOTE 4 8th Street west of PCH 4,448 +494 4,942 +11.1 YES 6th Street west of PCH 1,635 See Note 1 1,168 -28.6 NO 6th Street east of Ardmore 1,203 See Note 2 1,670 +38.3 YES 5th Street west of PCH 2,194 +252 2,446 +11.5 YES 2nd Street west of PCH 3,050 +262 3,312 +8.6 YES Ardmore Avenue north of 6th Street 3,886 +494 4,380 +12.7 YES Ardmore Avenue south of 6th Street 3,370 See Note 3 4,295 +27.4 YES Ardmore Avenue north of 2nd Street 1,630 +327 1,957 +20.1 YES 1. Eastbound 6th Street west of Pacific Coast Highway + redirected westbound 6th Street east of Ardmore Ave; 627 + 541 = 1168. 2. Eastbound 6th Street east of Ardmore Ave + redistributed westbound 6th Street west of Pacific Coast Highway; 662 + 1008 = 1670. 3. Northbound redistribution from westbound 6th Street east of Ardmore Ave + northbound redistribution from westbound 6th Street west of Pacific Coast Highway - south redistribution from westbound 6th Street east of Ardmore Ave; 476 + 514 - 65 = 925. 4. Residential street impact criteria: Final Daily Traffic 1,000 or more 2,000 or more 3,000 or more Related Increase in Daily Traffic 12% or more of final daily 10% or more of final daily 8% or more of final daily 1 1 t t 1 1 1 1 1 • • Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS AND LEVELS OF SERVICE AM AND PM PEAK HOURS 6TH Street Hermosa Beach NO. INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR [1] EXISTING V/C LOS [2] WITH 6TH ONE-WAY EASTBOUND V/C LOS CHANGE V/C [(2)-(1)] SIGNIF. IMPACT 1 Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) and AM 0.916 E 0.916 E 0.000 NO 8TH Street 8TH Street PM 0.844 D 0.848 D 0.004 NO AM 0.7 A 3.0 A 2.3 NO 6TH Street PM 0.4 A 2.1 A 1.7 NO • Ardmore Avenue and 2 Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) and AM 0.814 D 0.814 D 0.000 NO PM 5TH Street PM 0.789 C 0.803 D 0.014 NO 3 Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) and AM 0.812 D 0.813 D 0.001 NO PM 2ND Street PM 0.814 D 0.818 D 0.004 NO SUMMARY OF UNIGNALIZED INTERSETION DELAYS AND LEVELS OF SERVICE AM AND PM PEAK HOURS NO. INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR [1] EXISTING (a) (DELAY LOS [2] WITH 6TH ONE-WAY EB (a) DELAY LOS CHANGE V/C [(2)-(1)] SIGNIF. IMPACT 4 Ardmore Avenue and AM 6.4 B 6.7 B 0.3 NO 8TH Street PM 1 4.5 A 4.9 A 0.4 NO 5 Ardmore Avenue and AM 0.7 A 3.0 A 2.3 NO 6TH Street PM 0.4 A 2.1 A 1.7 NO 6 Ardmore Avenue and AM 1.0 A 1.4 A 0.4 NO 5TH Street PM 0.9 A 1.2 A 0.3 NO 7 Ardmore Avenue and AM 2.0 A 2.0 A 0.0 NO 2ND Street PM 2.1 A 2.2 A 0.1 NO (a) Average intersection delay (seconds). • • Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers ICU Data Worksheets - AM and PM Peak Hours t 1 1 1 t t • LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 N -S St: E -W St: Project: File: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) 8TH Street 6th Street One -Way EB - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 ICU5 1997 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST ONE-WAY EB Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 25 1600 0.016 0 25 0.016 Nb Thru 3146 4800 0.656 * 0 3146 0.656 * Nb Right 4 0 - 0 4 - Sb Left 4 1600 0.003 * 0 4 0.003 * Sb Thru 1211 3200 0.388 3 1214 0.392 Sb Right 32 0 - 8 40 - Eb Left 225 0 0.000 0 225 0.000 Eb Thru 0 1600 0.157 * 0 0 0.157 * Eb Right 26 0 - 0 26 - Wb Left 11 0 0.000 * 0 11 0.000 * Wb Thru 32 1600 0.040 0 32 0.040 Wb Right 21 0 - 0 21 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU 0.916 0.916 LOS E E * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green • INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 8TH Street Peak hr: AM Date: Date of Count: Projection Year: 03/13/98 1997 1998 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 N -S St: E -W St: Project: File: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) 8TH Street 6th Street One -Way EB - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 ICU5 1997 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST ONE-WAY EB Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 35 1600 0.022 * 0 35 0.022 * Nb Thru 1704 3200 0.534 0 1704 0.534 Nb Right 4 0 - 0 4 - Sb Left 4 1600 0.003 0 4 0.003 Sb Thru 2981 4800 0.644 * 5 2986 0.648 * Sb Right 111 0 - 15 126 - Eb Left 91 0 0.000 0 91 0.000 Eb Thru 1 1600 0.078 * 0 1 0.078 * Eb Right 33 0 - 0 33 - Wb Left 21 0 0.000 * 0 21 0.000 * Wb Thru 23 1600 0.037 0 23 0.037 Wb Right 15 0 - 0 15 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU 0.844 0.848 LOS D D * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green • INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 8TH Street Peak hr: PM Date: Date of Count: Projection Year: 03/13/98 1997 1998 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 N -S St: E -W St: Project: File: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) 5TH Street 6th Street One -Way EB - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 ICU7 1997 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST ONE-WAY EB Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 11 1600 0.007 7 18 0.011 Nb Thru 3066 4800 0.646 * 0 3066 0.646 * Nb Right 35 0 - 0 35 - Sb Left 51 1600 0.032 * 0 51 0.032 * Sb Thru 1152 3200 0.363 1 1153 0.378 Sb Right 10 0 - 47 57 - Eb Left 14 0 0.000 * 0 14 0.000 * Eb Thru 11 1600 0.023 0 11 0.023 Eb Right 12 0 - 0 12 - Wb Left 9 0 0.000 0 9 0.000 Wb Thru 10 1600 0.036 * 0 10 0.036 * Wb Right 39 0 - 0 39 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU 0.814 0.814 LOS D D * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green • INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 5TH Street Peak hr: AM Date: Date of Count: Projection Year: 03/13/98 1997 1998 t 1 t • LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 N -S St: E -W St: Project: File: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) 5TH Street 6th Street One -Way EB - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 ICU7 1997 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST ONE-WAY EB Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 17 1600 0.011 * 10 27 0.017 * Nb Thru 1654 3200 0.525 0 1654 0.525 Nb Right 25 0 - 0 25 - Sb Left 84 1600 0.053 0 84 0.053 Sb Thru 2916 4800 0.614 * 7 2923 0.622 * Sb Right 33 0 - 28 61 - Eb Left 38 0 0.000 * 0 38 0.000 * Eb Thru 22 1600 0.054 0 22 0.054 Eb Right 26 0 - 0 26 - Wb Left 34 0 0.000 0 34 0.000 Wb Thru 25 1600 0.064 * 0 25 0.064 * Wb Right 44 0 - 0 44 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU 0.789 0.803 LOS C C * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green • INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 5TH Street Peak hr: PM Date: Date of Count: Projection Year: 03/13/98 1997 1998 1 1 • LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 N -S St: E -W St: Project: File: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) 2ND Street 6th Street One -Way EB - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 ICU8 1998 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST ONE-WAY EB Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 42 1600 0.026 4 46 0.029 Nb Thru 3095 4800 0.645 * 7 3102 0.646 * Nb Right 0 0 - 0 0 - Sb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0.000 * Sb Thru 1186 3200 0.385 1 1187 0.385 Sb Right 45 0 - 0 45 - Eb Left 76 0 0.000 0 76 0.000 Eb Thru 0 1600 0.067 * 0 0 0.067 * Eb Right 31 0 - 0 31 - Wb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0.000 * Wb Thru 0 1600 0.000 0 0 0.000 Wb Right 0 0 - 0 0 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU • 0.812 0.813 LOS D D * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green • INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 2ND Street Peak hr: AM Date: Date of Count: Projection Year: 03/13/98 1998 1998 1 1 • LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 234 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena, CA 91101 626.796.2322 N -S St: E -W St: Project: File: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) 2ND Street 6th Street One -Way EB - Hermosa Beach/1-972704-1 ICU8 1998 EXIST. TRAFFIC 1 2 V/C Movement Volume Capacity Ratio W/6TH ST ONE-WAY EB Added Total V/C Volume Volume Ratio Nb Left 47 1600 0.029 * 4 51 0.032 * Nb Thru 1737 3200 0.543 10 1747 0.546 Nb Right 0 0 - 0 0 - Sb Left 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 Sb Thru 2851 4800 0.609 * 7 2858 0.611 * Sb Right 74 0 - 0 74 - Eb Left 59 0 0.000 0 59 0.000 Eb Thru 0 1600 0.075 * 0 0 0.075 * Eb Right 61 0 - 0 61 - Wb Left 0 0 0.000 * 0 0 0.000 * Wb Thru 0 1600 0.000 0 0 0.000 Wb Right 0 0 - 0 0 - Yellow Allowance: 0.100 * 0.100 * ICU 0.814 0.818 LOS D D * Key conflicting movement as a part of ICU 1 Counts conducted by:Accutek 2 Capacity expressed in veh/hour of green • INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) @ 2ND Street Peak hr: PM Date: Date of Count: Projection Year: 03/13/98 1998 1998 • • Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers HCM Data Worksheets - Existing Condtions • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT1C1AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 8th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour INT1C1AM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 50 203 28 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 6 48 29 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 99 182 38 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 0 83 16 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 53 6 104 0 RT Flow Rate 29 31 40 17 Approach Flow Rate 296 88 336 104 Proportion LT 0.18 0.07 0.31 0.00 Proportion RT 0.10 0.35 0.12 0.16 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 88 296 104 336 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 440 440 384 384 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.36 0.11 0.41 0.13 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.11 0.36 0.13 0.41 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes. on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 6 53 0 104 RT, Opposing Approach 31 29 17 40 LT, Conflicting Approaches 104 104 59 59 RT, Conflicting Approaches 57 57 60 60 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.07 0.18 0.00 0.31 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.35 0.10 0.16 0.12 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.24 0.24 0.15 0.15 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.16 Approach Capacity 552 392 630 443 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 296 552 0.54 7.7 B SB 88 392 0.22 2.3 A EB 336 630 0.53 7.6 B WB 104 443 0.23 2.4 A Intersection Delay = 6.4 Level of Service (Intersection) = B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT1C1PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Analyst Date of Analysis Other Information Avenue DLR All -way Stop -controlled 3/11/98 (E -W) 8th Street 1998 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour INT1C1PM Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O > 1 < 0 49 84 13 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 24 123 99 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound O T R O > 1 < 0 31 87 27 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 9 145 17 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate RT Flow Rate Approach Flow Rate Proportion LT Proportion RT Opposing Approach Flow Rate Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate Lanes on Subject Approach Lanes on Opposing Approach LT, Opposing Approach RT, Opposing Approach LT, Conflicting Approaches RT, Conflicting Approaches Proportion LT, Opposing Approach Proportion RT, Opposing Approach Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches Approach Capacity 52 14 154 O .34 O .09 258 333 0.21 0.35 1 1 25 104 42 46 0.10 O .40 O .13 O .14 604 25 104 258 0.10 O .40 154 333 0.35 O .21 1 1 52 14 42 46 O .34 0.09 0.13 0.14 511 33 28 153 O .22 O .18 180 412 O .21 O .24 1 1 9 18 77 118 O .05 O .10 O .19 O .29 509 9 18 180 0.05 0.10 153 412 0.24 0.21 1 1 33 28 77 118 0.22 0.18 0.19 0.29 487 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Movement Flow Rate NB SB EB WB 154 258 153 180 Approach V/C Capacity Ratio 604 511 509 487 O .25 O .50 O .30 O .37 Average Total Delay Intersection Delay = 4.5 Level of Service (Intersection) = A 2.6 6.8 3.1 4.1 LOS A B A A • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C1AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 6th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour INT2CIAM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s (%) SU/RV's (9) CV's (%) PCE's Northbound L T R O 1 < 0 N 230 2 .95 .95 0 Southbound L T R O > 1 0 N 25 .95 1.10 60 .95 0 Eastbound L T R O 0 0 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 1 0 44 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Vehicle Maneuver Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) Follow-up Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 111 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C1AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 243 II Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1043 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1043 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 IIStep 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 244 II Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1312 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1312 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 I RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 IIStep 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 332 II Potential Capacity: (pcph) 730 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 713 1 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB I Conflicting Flows: (vph) 332 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 680 Major LT, Minor TH II Impedance Factor: 0.98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.98 IIMovement Capacity: (pcph) 664 1 I • • ilHCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C1AM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary 11 Avg. 9596.- Flow 50Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay IIMovement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 1 664 > WB T 0 713 > 1032 3.7 0.0 A 3.7 II WB R 51 1043 > SB L 29 1312 2.8 0.0 A 0.8 IIntersection Delay = 0.7 sec/veh I I I I I I I I I I I I • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C1PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 6th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour INT2C1PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's ( 6 ) CV's PCE's Northbound L T R 0 1 < 0 N 139 7 .95 .95 0 Southbound L T R O > 1 0 N 11 129 .95 .95 0 1.10 Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 7 0 23 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Vehicle Maneuver Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) Follow-up Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C1PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 150 1162 1162 O .98 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 153 1449 1449 O .99 1700 O .99 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 298 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 761 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 754 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 298 712 O .99 0.99 O .99 705 ' . • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C1PM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary IIAvg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay 11 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 8 705 > WB T 0 754 > 1008 3.7 0.0 A 3.7 II WB R 26 1162 > SB L 13 1449 2.5 0.0 A 0.2 IIIntersection Delay = 0.4 sec/veh • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C1AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 5th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour INT3CIAM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s (%) SU/RV's (515.) CV's (% ) PCE's Northbound L T R 0 1 < 0 N 170 22 .95 95 0 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 0 35 37 .95 .95 0 1.10 N Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 1 0 61 ..95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Vehicle Maneuver Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) Follow-up Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C1AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 190 1109 1109 0.94 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 202 1373 1373 0.97 1700 0.97 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 266 791 0.97 767 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 266 743 0.97 0.97 0.97 720 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C1AM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 1 720 > WB T 0 767 > 1101 3.5 0.1 A 3.5 WB R 70 1109 > SB L 41 1373 2.7 0.0 A Intersection Delay = 1.0 sec/veh 1.3 411 S HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C1PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 5th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour INT3C1PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s (% ) SU/RV's (o) CV's M) ) PCE's Northbound L T R O 1 < 0 N 98 16 .95 95 0 Vehicle Maneuver Southbound L T R O > 1 0 N 38 105 .95 .95 0 1.10 Eastbound L T R O 0 0 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 14 0 38 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) Follow-up Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C1PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection II Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 112 II Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1215 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1215 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.96 IIStep 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 120 II Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1503 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1503 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 II RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 II Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 262 1 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 795. Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 770 IProb. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB 11 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 262 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 747 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.97 II Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 II Movement Capacity: (pcph) 724 1 1 1 1 1 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C1PM.HCO 'Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 9596- Flow 50Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 17 724 > WB T 0 770 > 1022 3.7 0.1 A 3.7 WB R 44 1215 > SB L 44 1503 2.5 0.0 A Intersection Delay = 0.9 sec/veh 0.7 111 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT4C1AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 2th Street , Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour INT4C1AM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O > 1 < 0 15 60 18 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R O > 1 < 0 19 10 12 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R O > 1 < 0 39 74 7 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 6 5 20 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 16 20 41 6 RT Flow Rate 19 13 7 21 Approach Flow Rate 98 44 126 32 Proportion LT 0.16 0.45 0.33 0.19 Proportion RT 0.19 0.30 0.06 0.66 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 44 98 32 126 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 158 158 142 142 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.33 0.15 0.42 0.11 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.15 0.33 0.11 0.42 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 20 16 6 41 RT, Opposing Approach 13 19 21 7 LT, Conflicting Approaches 47 47 36 36 RT, Conflicting Approaches 28 28 32 32 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.45 0.16 0.19 0.33 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.30 0.19 0.66 0.06 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.18 0.18 0.23 0.23 Approach Capacity 416 429 661 406 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 98 416 0.24 2.4 A SB 44 429 0.10 1.5 A EB 126 661 0.19 2.1 A WB 32 406 0.08 1.3 A Intersection Delay = 2.0 Level of Service (Intersection) = A • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT4C1PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 2th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information 1998 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour INT4C1PM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O > 1 < 0 10 22 16 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 38 25 45 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 28 52 11 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 13 85 16 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 11 40 29 14 RT Flow Rate 17 47 12 17 Approach Flow Rate 51 113 96 120 Proportion LT 0.22 0.35 0.30 0.12 Proportion RT 0.33 0.42 0.13 0.14 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 113 51 120 96 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 216 216 164 164 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.13 0.30 0.25 0.32 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.30 0.13 0.32 0.25 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 40 11 14 29 RT, Opposing Approach 47 17 17 12 LT, Conflicting Approaches 43 43 51 51 RT, Conflicting Approaches 29 29 64 64 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.35 0.22 0.12 0.30 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.42 0.33 0.14 0.13 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.20 0.20 0.31 0.31 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 0.39 0.39 Approach Capacity 400 474 591 551 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 51 400 0.13 1.6 A SB 113 474 0.24 2.5 A EB 96 591 0.16 1.9 A WB 120 551 0.22 2.3 A Intersection Delay = 2.1 Level of Service (Intersection) = A • Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers HCM Data Worksheets - Existing plus 6th Street One -Way Eastbound Conditions • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT1C2AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 8th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information With 6th Street One -Way AM Peak Hour INT1C2AM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 50 203 28 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 6 48 29 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 99 182 38 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 8 83 16 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 53 6 104 8 RT Flow Rate 29 31 40 17 Approach Flow Rate 296 88 336 112 Proportion LT 0.18 0.07 0.31 0.07 Proportion RT 0.10 0.35 0.12 0.15 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 88 296 112 336 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate .448 448 384 384 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.36 0.11 0.40 0.13 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.11 0.36 0.13 0.40 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 6 53 8 104 RT, Opposing Approach 31 29 17 40 LT, Conflicting Approaches 112 112 59 59 RT, Conflicting Approaches 57 57 60 60 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.07 0.18 0.07 0.31 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach .0.35 0.10 0.15 0.12 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.25. 0.25 0.15 0.15 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.16 Approach Capacity 543 384 608 449 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 296 543 0.55 7.9 B SB 88 384 0.23 2.4 A EB 336 608 0.55 8.2 B WB 112 449 0.25 2.6 A Intersection Delay = 6.7 Level of Service (Intersection) = B • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT1C2PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 8th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information With 6th Street One -Way PM Peak Hour INT1C2PM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 49 84 13 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 24 123 99 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 31 87 27 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 24 145 17 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 52 25 33 25 RT Flow Rate 14 104 28 18 Approach Flow Rate 154 258 153 196 Proportion LT 0.34 0.10 0.22 0.13 Proportion RT 0.09 0.40 0.18 0.09 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 258 154 196 153 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 349 349 412 412 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.20 0.34 0.20 0.26 Proportion, Opposing' Approach Flow Rate 0.34 0.20 0.26 0.20 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 25 52 25 33 RT, Opposing Approach 104 14 18 28 LT, Conflicting Approaches 58 58 77 77 RT, Conflicting Approaches 46 46 118 118 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.10 0.34 0.13 0.22 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.40 0.09 0.09 0.18 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.17 0.17 0.19 0.19 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 0.29 0.29 Approach Capacity 581 487 491 500 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 154 581 0.27 2.7 A SB 258 487 0.53 7.5 B EB 153 491 0.31 3.3 A WB 196 500 0.39 4.4 A Intersection Delay = 4.9 Level of Service (Intersection) = A 110 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C2AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 6th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information With 6th Street One -Way AM Peak Hour INT2C2AM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R O 1 < 0 274 16 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 0 33 60 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R O 0 0 Westbound L T R O 0 0 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 0 35 RT Flow Rate 17 0 Approach Flow Rate 305 98 Proportion LT 0.00 0.36 Proportion RT 0.06 0.00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate. 98 305 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 0 0 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.76 0 24 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.24 0 76 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 35 0 RT, Opposing Approach 0 17 LT, Conflicting Approaches 0 0 RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 0 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.36 0.00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.06 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.00 0.00 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.00 0.00 Approach Capacity 920 884 Movement NB SB Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS 305 920 0.33 3.5 A 98 884 0.11 1.5 A . Intersection Delay = 3.0 Level of Service (Intersection) = A • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT2C2PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 6th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information With 6th Street One -Way PM Peak Hour INT2C2PM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R 0 1 < 0 162 26 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 0 26 129 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R O 0 0 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet Westbound L T R O 0 0 NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 0 27 RT Flow Rate 27 0 Approach Flow Rate 198 163 Proportion LT 0.00 0.17 Proportion RT 0.14 0.00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 163 198 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 0 0 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.55 0.45 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.45 0.55 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 27 0 RT, Opposing Approach 0 27 LT, Conflicting Approaches 0 0 RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 0 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.17 0.00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.14 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.00 0.00 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.00 0.00 Approach Capacity 915 963 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 198 915 0.22 2.3 A SB 163 963 0.17 1.9 A Intersection Delay = 2.1 Level of Service (Intersection) = A • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C2AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 5th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information With 6th Street One -Way - AM Peak Hour INT3C2AM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's Northbound L T R 0 1 < 0 N 174 22 .95 .95 0 Southbound L T R Eastbound L T R 0> 1 0 0 0 0 N 35 37 .95 .95 0 1.10 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 1 0 115 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Vehicle Maneuver Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) Follow-up Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C2AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection I Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 194 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1104 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1104 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.88 I Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 206 II Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1367 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1367 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 II RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 II Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 270 I Potential Capacity: (pcph) 787 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 763 IIProb. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB II Conflicting Flows: (vph) 270 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 739 Major LT, Minor TH IIImpedance Factor: 0.97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 II Movement Capacity: (pcph) 716 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C2AM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 1 716 > WB T 0 763 > 1100 3.7 0.4 A 3.7 ' WB R 133 1104 > SB L 41 1367 2.7 0.0 A 1.3 ' Intersection Delay = 1.4 sec/veh I 1 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C2PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 5th Street Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information With 6th Street One -Way - PM Peak Hour INT3C2PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (o) SU/RV's (o) CV's (o) PCE's Northbound L T R O 1 < 0 N 102 16 .95 95 0 Southbound L T R O > 1 38 105 .95 .95 0 1.10 0 N Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 Westbound L T R O > 1 < 0 14 0 76 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Vehicle Maneuver Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) Follow-up Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C2PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 116 111 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1209 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1209 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.93 II Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 124 II Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1496 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1496 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 II RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 I Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 266 ' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 791 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 766 IIProb. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB II Conflicting Flows: (vph) 266 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 743 Major LT, Minor TH IIImpedance Factor: 0.97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97. Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 IIMovement Capacity: (pcph) 720 1 • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT3C2PM.HCO Page 3 II Intersection Performance Summary II Avg. 9596- Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay IIMovement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 17 720 > WB T 0 766 > 1089 3.7 0.3 A 3.7 11 WB R 88 1209 > a - SB L 44 1496 2.5 0.0 A 0.7 IIIntersection Delay = 1.2 sec/veh • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d INT4C2AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 2th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information With 6th Street One -Way AM Peak Hour INT4C2AM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 15 60 18 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 19 10 12 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 39 74 7 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 6 5 24 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 16 20 41 6 RT Flow Rate 19 13 7 25 Approach Flow Rate 98 44 126 36 Proportion LT 0.16 0.45 0.33 0.17 Proportion RT 0.19 0.30 0.06 0.69 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 44 98 36 126 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 162 162 142 142 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.32 0.14 0.41 0.12 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow' Rate 0.14 0.32 0.12 0.41 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 20 16 6 41 RT, Opposing Approach 13 19 25 7 LT, Conflicting Approaches 47 47 36 36 RT, Conflicting Approaches 32 32 32 32 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.45 0.16 0.17 0.33 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.30 0.19 0.69 0.06 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.29 0.29 0.25 0.25 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.20 0.20 0.23 0.23 Approach Capacity 419 432 678 414 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 98 419 0.23 2.4 A SB 44 432 0.10 1.5 A EB 126 678 0.19 2.0 A WB 36 414 0.09 1.4 A Intersection Delay = 2.0 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d ± T4C2PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) Ardmore Avenue (E -W) 2th Street Analyst DLR Date of Analysis 3/11/98 Other Information With 6th Street One -Way PM Peak Hour INT4C2PM All -way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Volumes PHF Northbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 10 22 16 .95 .95 .95 Southbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 38 25 45 .95 .95 .95 Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 28 52 11 .95 .95 .95 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 13 85 20 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet NB SB EB WB LT Flow Rate 11 40 29 14 RT Flow Rate 17 47 12 21 Approach Flow Rate 51 113 96 124 Proportion LT 0.22 0.35 0.30 0.11 Proportion RT 0.33 0.42 0.13 0.17 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 113 51 124 96 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 220 220 164 164 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.13 0.29 0.25 0.32 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.29 0.13 0.32 0.25 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 40 11 14 29 RT, Opposing Approach 47 17 21 12 LT, Conflicting Approaches 43 43 51 51 RT, Conflicting Approaches 33 33 64 64 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.35 0.22 0.11 0.30 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.42 0.33 0.17 0.13 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.20 0.20 0.31 0.31 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.15 0.15 0.39 0.39 Approach Capacity 402 476 600 556 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS NB 51 402 0.13 1.6 A SB 113 476 0.24 2.5 A EB 96 600 0.16 1.8 A WB 124 556 0.22 2.3 A Intersection Delay = 2.2 Level of Service (Intersection) = A t t 1 1 t t u7 O VizC7 0 0 N w 0 r 3) m (-%95 8TH PLACE 8TH STREET 7TH STREET 4 r x-328 r- 65 4111111" RESIDENTIAL - COMMERCIAL. 6TH STREET 5TH STREET 4TH STREET 3RD STREET 2ND STREET 1ST PLACE 219 -o n 0 M 8TH 7TH 0 4TH Dc sg 6TH 5TH LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGUNEERS NOT TO SCALE 5 24-HOUR TRAFFIC REDISTRIBUTION 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH ss ■s ss .n as ss .. on ss as no Mr am ss as .n an ss ss • • 0: \Joa_FLE\2704\DWC\ 4 --541 662 1203 Total 6TH STREET —1008 627 "y. F 1635 Total -o EXISTING 24-HOUR -- 322 1096 -- 1418 Total REgoEtsmAL _ COMMERCIAL tit --0 199 6TH STREET -- 574 846 1420 Total '0 I WITH WESTBOUND BARRIER SEPARATING COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN 6 24 HOUR TRAFFIC WITH 6TH STREET ONE-WAY EASTBOUND 6TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH E y .q C UNE ERS NOT TO SCALE ENGINEERS & PLANNERS ■ TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION , PARKING I May 21, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 12, 1998 LORETO PLAZA - LEASE OF ADDITIONAL AIRSPACE Recommendation: 1. That the City Council determine whether or not to lease additional airspace. 2. If the City Council decides to lease the additional airspace, City Manager should be directed to contract for the appraisal upon payment of the deposit and direct that the lease be revised to reflect your decision. Background: The City Attorney and I met with Leslie Newton on March 23, 1998 concerning the proposal to use additional airspace over Loreto Plaza to expand an existing restaurant space on the second level. Based on our discussion during that meeting, I obtained a proposal to have the airspace appraised in order to fix a fair market rental rate for the space. The quote for the work was $3,500 for the airspace rental plus $1700 to develop a sale value. This information was passed on to Mr. Newton. Mr. Newton met with his tenants and they both declined to pay for the appraisal because they did not believe it would be conclusive due to the uniqueness of the space. Instead, they provided a proposal for a new lease, keeping the existing area at 500 per square foot and proposing $1.00 per square foot for the new space, forgoing the reservation of rights and acknowledging in the lease that the City can charge for the airspace. The proposed term was 10 years, plus a 10 year option, with payment for the new area beginning when the construction was completed. A second proposal has been submitted that addresses stars concern about the appraisal. The tenants are now willing to pay for the cost of appraisal and the rent as determined by the professional appraiser if the City is willing to lease the additional space. The appraisal can be done in 4-5 weeks and is a company selected by the City which is Lee & Associates of Los Angeles. Assuming that the City Council is willing to allow the lease of the additional area, staff would propose the following items be included in the lease: 1. Newtons acknowledge that they need a lease to use the area for the restaurant and they have an obligation to pay rent. This would eliminate any disputes in the future about the easement. i • 2. The new lease include both the existing lease area and the proposed lease area. Together this will total 744 square feet as proposed (see Exhibit A) The new lease will have a minimum rent of $1.00 per square foot. If the appraisal comes in at a higher rate then the higher rate would be charged. This would be $744.00 per month or $8,928.00 per year. The new lease have a 10 year term with a 10 year option as proposed. This is the same as the original lease. 3. The new lease effective date would be when the City Council grants approval. In other words, rent would be due as soon as the leasee starts work on the leasehold. Any additional rent due as a result of the appraisal would be retroactive to the effective date. 4. Applicant deposit a check for the amount of the appraisal before the work is started. Analysis The issue for the City Council to decide is whether or not to lease this airspace to the property owner (Mr. Newton) for the fair market rent as determined by the appraiser. In addition to determining the rent, the actual space being rented will be verified. The minimum rent, effective date, and term will be as outlined by staff above. Respectfully submitted, Step R. Burrell City Manager Attachments: Proposal #1 Proposal #2 Drawing of leased area (Exhibit A) Copy of existing lease (Exhibit B) Apr 01 98 05:37p Sc Ire FAX310-376-9380 TO: FROM: RE: Leslie Newton Steve Burrell Jerry Newton Loreto Plaza 4025-2413 p.2 I met with John and the other interested parties last night. There was no interest in retaining Lee & Associates to conduct an appraisal for two reasons: (1) an appraisal is a comparison, what a willing buyer will pay a willing seller. There is no comparable for municipal rental of air space in the beach cities, and in fact the only person in the world who could rent the air space is me. As such, the appraisal would have little value; and (2) $3,500 is simply too much money to pay to generate such a document. Having said that, and after discussions with John and the others, I would like to make the following proposal: 1. I would request the City enter into a new lease with me for the air space currently under lease as well as the new air space included in the proposal approved by the planning commission. 2. As part of this new lease, I would be willing to drop the issue of my reservation of rights and would acknowledge in the lease that the City can charge rent for all air space — that included in the"1991 lease as well as the additional air space to be leased by the City. 3. I would like the new lease to essentially track the language of the old lease. The terms should be 1Q years with a 10 year option. 4. With respect to rent, I currently rent approximately 325 square fact at 50¢ per. John's group is proposing adding approximately 400 square feet. They are willing to pay $1.00 per for the new space. This works out to 325 x 50¢ + 400 x $1.00, or $562.50, which is about 78¢ per square foot. Keep in mind that this is on top of the 51.50 per square foot John has to pay me It is also more than 50% higher than the, rent paid on Pier Avenue for what amounts to permanent .6,69 construction on a public right of way. e 5. With respect to the new rent for the entire bridge, I would ask that it not take effect until a toy/ Q( LE106K certificate of occupancy is issued after John completes construction. 610t CCP filthdb These are the essential deal points I would like to see is the lease that would be the subject of the ,ejc _ hearing on 4/28. I think this can be hammered out quickly, since Mike can take the existing lease and adapt it to the new terms. Before I make the formal the non n o, b n 4/28, I did sot first that would approve the wording of the lease. I wouldhappy Apr 01 98 05:37p 111 Leslie Newton 0 40 25-2413 probably trigger new objections, so I am throwing the ball into your court. I will be in Cannel until Sunday. The telephone number is 408-625-0629. Our fax number is 408-625-2413. p.3 JERRY L. NEWTON LESLIE A. NEWTON • • NEWTON AND NEWTON aneya at -taus 53 PIER AVENUE. 2wo FLOOR HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 TELEPHONE (310) 937-5800 May 14, 1998 VIA FAX AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Stephen Burrell Hermosa Beach City Manager 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: Fat Face Fenner's Fishack/Loreto Plaza Dear Steve: FAX (310) 937-5802 r , r- y'm'1. E fps a a NAY 1 8 1998 CITY MANAGER'S 'OFFICE I would like to submit the following comments to you for inclusion in the Council packet on the issue of a new lease for airspace to allow expansion of Fat Face Fenner's Fishack: 1. To clear up any misunderstanding, my tenant leased the space previously occupied by Casablanca Restaurant in August of 1997. His lease did not include nor contemplate an expansion of the existing footprint of that restaurant at the time the lease was entered into. Contrary to some comments I have heard, I did not rent the tenant airspace which was not already subject to a lease with the City. 2. A few months after the lease was entered into, the tenant asked if I had any objection to an expansion of the enclosed bridge. I indicated that I had no objection, but that the matter would require the consent of the City since the City owned the airspace over the proposed expansion. 3. I am prepared to enter into a new lease with the City which would supersede the existing lease and which would include a lease of additional airspace included in the expanded bridge enclosure. With respect to such new lease, I would want the following provisions included therein: A. Any new lease cannot modify or alter the terms of the existing easement I have pursuant to the 1975 easement agreement with the City. I have two concerns: (1) an easement is an interest in real property, albeit incorporeal. As such, the existing easement is part of the security under the note and deed of trust I have with my lender. Any modification or alteration of the easement could affect any of a number of provisions in the note and deed of trust; and (2) I have been advised by counsel not to alter or modify the terms of said easement. • • Stephen Burrell May 14, 1998 Page Two B. With respect to the terms of the lease, I would like it to be for 10 years, with a 10 year option, in order to justify the cost of construction. At the conclusion of the lease, if the City requires that the enclosed bridge be removed, I want the right to return the bridge to its original condition -- i.e., the same as the existing bridge which is not enclosed. C. With respect to the amount of rent to be paid for airspace, I am willing to pay fair market value. As you know, the amount of rent charged me is passed through to my tenant per the terms of our lease. My tenant has agreed to pay for the cost of an appraisal to determine fair market value and to pay such additional rent as the appraiser determines to be fair market value once the City agrees to enter into a lease with me. D. Assuming the City agrees to lease the airspace at the next Council meeting, on behalf of my tenant I request permission to immediately begin construction. Once the appraiser has determined the fair market rental value for the airspace, I will pay such rent retroactive to the City from the date the lease is executed by both parties. As soon as you have been able to prepare a draft of a lease including these provisions, please forward a copy of same to me for my comments. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. JERRY L. NEWTON JLN:In cc: Fat Face Fenner's Fishack Michael Jenkins, Esq. -t _ NOTE: HATCHED AREA DENOTES PORTION CURRENTLY ENCLOSED (2ND FLR) - 4 �C 4 10'-8 3 U 2 • EXHIBIT A LORETO PLAZA LORETO PLAZA EASEMENT AREA TABULATION Existing Proposed Total Lot 23 width/ area (sq.ft.) 30' / 2850 Enclosed Aerial Walkway - Sq. Ft. 359 Open Walkways Sq. Ft. 846 Open Deck - Sq. Ft. 210 175 569 846 175 Total All Walkways and Deck 1205 385 1590 Existing Lease Proposed Lease 359 385 Total 744 Based Upon Actual Measurements I, AGREEMENT FOR RENT THIS RENTAL AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as of 27thday of August , 1991 , by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (the "City"), a municipal corporation, and JERRY L. NEWTON and LESLIE A. NEWTON (hereinafter together referred to as the "Tenant"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City owns that certain real property located in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, more specifically described as Lot 23, Block 13, Hermosa Beach Tract as per map recorded in Book 1, pages 25-26 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, and more commonly known as 51 Pier Avenue (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property .is encumbered, by,•a non-exclusive easement, duly recorded on ,July 10, 1975 as' document'. number D672L in the Office of the County Recorder_ of .Los Angeles County kfor :the benefit of adjacent property owned by the Tenant (the •'Easemert'V) , and which Easement provides for pedestrian ingress .and ;`egregs together with theright toconstruct certain improvements 'on, across and above the Property; and WHEREAS, Tenant has constructed a walkway above grade on the Property in conformance with the terms of the Easement, which walkway connects the buildings owned by Tenant on either side of the Property to provide access to the second story of said buildings; and • WHEREAS, Tenant desires and City is willing_"to..demise a portion of the Property i.e., certain air rights (hereinafter the "Demised Property") to allow the construction of an enclosure of a portion of the upstairs walkway at the northern end of said walkway (hereinafter the "Improvements") in order to connect portions of a restaurant within the Tenant's buildings. NOW, THEREFORE, inconsideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. Rental of Demised Property. Tenant acknowledges and agrees to occupy the Demised Property in accordance with the terms, provisions, covenants and agreements'bontained herein. EXHIBIT "B" The Demised Property is hereby described as that certain portion of air rights within the Property located in the existing upstairs walkway and is more specifically described in the plans for the Improvements attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "1". Section 2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of ten (10) years which shall commence on the date a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the City for the Improvements, and shall G 1� automatically terminate in the event that a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued for said Improvements, within one (1) year of the effective date of this Agreement or unless extended or sooner terminated by either party as provided herein. Section 3. Rent. Tenant shall Ray to City as rent for the Demised Property an amount in the sum of Une Hundred and Sixty -Two and .55 dollars ($162_55 ) per month. Said rental ,payment shall be due and payable. in advance on the first day of each month during the term of this Agreement. Rent for any period during the term of this Agreement which is for .less than one (1) month shall be a pro rata portion of the monthly installment. Rent shall be payable without notice or demand and without any deduction, offset or abatement in lawful money of the United States to the City at the address stated herein for notices or to other persons or such places as the City may designate to Tenant in writing. The rent amount shall be administratively adjusted annually on September 1 of each year up a maximum percentage of the lower of the following: a. the percentage increase in the City's General Fund operating appropriations over the prior fiscal year, or b. the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers, Los Angeles/ Long Beach area, all items, for the twelve months ending the prior May,of the same calendar year. Section 4." Option to Extend Tenant is given the option to extend the term of this Agreement on all the provisions contained herein, except for rent, 273 2. for a term of a ten (10) year period ('extended term") following the expiration of the initial term, by giving notice of exercise of the option ("option notice") to the City at least six (6) months but not more than one (1) year before the expiration of the initial term. Provided that, if the tenant is in default on the date of giving the option notice, the option notice shall be totally ineffective, or if the tenant is in default on the date the extended term is to commence, the extended term shall not commence and this Agreement shall expire at the end of the initial term. The parties shall have sixty (60) days after the City receives the option notice in which to agree on the monthly rent during the extended term. If the parties agree on the monthly rent for the extended term during said period, they shall immediately execute an amendment to this Agreement stating the monthly rent. u If the parties are unable to agree on the monthly rent for the extended term within said period, then the parties shall have ten (10) additional days in which to agree on a single real estate appraiser who shall set the monthly rent for the extended term and thereafter, the parties shall immediately execute an__ amendment to this Agreement stating said monthly rent. If.. within said additional ten (10) day period, the parties are unable to agree on a single real estate appraiser, then, within ten (10) days thereafter, each party, at their own cost and by giving notice to the other party, shall appoint a real estate appraiser with at least five years full-time commercial appraisal experience in the area in which the premises are located to appraise and set the monthly rent for the extended term. If a party does not appoint an appraiser with ten days after the other party has given notice of the name of its appraiser, the single appraiser appointed shall be the sole appraiser and shall set the monthly rent for the extended term. If the two appraisers are appointed by the parties as -stated in this paragraph, they shall meet promptly -and attempt to set the monthly rent for the extended term. If they are unable to agree within thirty (30) -days after the second appraiser has been appointed, they shall attempt to elect a third appraiser meeting the qualifications stated herein within ten (10) days .*after the last day the two are given to establish the monthly rent. If they are unable to agree on the third appraiser, either of the parties to this agreement, by giving ten (10) days notice to the other party can apply to the then President of the South Bay Board of Realtors for the selection of the third appraiser who meets the qualifications stated herein. Each of the parties shall bear one-half the cost of appointing the third appraiser and of paying the third appraiser's fee. The third appraiser , however selected, shall be a person who has not previously acted in any capacity for either party. 273 3. .f k Within thirty (30) days after the selection of the third appraiser, a majority of the appraisers shall set the monthly rent for the extended term. If the majority of the appraisers are unable to set the monthly rent within a stipulated period of time, the three appraisals shall be added together and their total divided by three; the resulting quotient shall be the monthly rent for the premises during the extended term. After the monthly rent for the extended term has been set, the appraisers shall immediately notify the parties. If tenant objects to the monthly rent that has been set, tenant shall have the right to have this lease expire at the end of the term, provided that the tenant pays all the costs in connection with the appraisal procedure that set the monthly rent. Tenant's election to allow this Agreement to expire at the end of the initial term must be exercised within ten (10) days after the receipt of notice from the appraisers of the monthly rent for the extended term. If the tenant does not exercise their election within said 10 -day period, the term of this Agreement shall be extended as provided in this Agreement and this Agreement shall be in full force and effect. Any other extension of the term of this Agreement shall be in the sole discretion of the City. Section 5. Use. purpose. Tenant shall use the Demised Property only for any lawful Tenant shall construct the Improvements on the Demised Property at Tenant's sole cost and expense and consistent with the plans and specifications attached hereto as Exhibit "1". Final plans and specifications shall be submitted to and subsequently approved by the Department of Building and Safety of the City. Tenant shall not cause nor permit any condition of hazardous waste or toxic substances in, on or about the Demised Property. Tenant hereby accepts the Demised Property in its condition existing as of the date that Tenant possess the Demised Property, subject to all applicable zoning, municipal, county and state laws, ordinances, regulations governing or regulating the use of the Demised Property and accepts this Agreement subject thereto and to all matters disclosed thereby. Tenant hereby acknowledges that neither the City nor any representative of the City has made any representation or warranty to Tenant as to the suitability of the Demised Property for the conduct of Tenant's business. 273 4. Section 6. Repair and Maintenance. Tenant shall at its own expense, repair and maintain, . during the term of this Agreement, the Demised Property in gocd order, condition and repair. - Section 7. Alterations and Additions. Tenant shall not, without the City's prior written consent, make any alterations, improvements or additions in or about the Demised Property other than as expressly provided in this Agreement. In any event, Tenant shall pay, when due, all claims for labor and materials furnished to or for Tenant at or for use in the Demised Property. Tenant shall not permit any mechanic's liens or materialman's liens to be levied against the Demised Property for any labor or material furnished to Tenant or claimed to have „been furnished to Tenant. Unless the City requires their removal, all alterations, improvements or additions which are made on the Demised Property by the Tenant shall become the property of the City and remain upon and be surrendered with the Demised Property at the expiration of the term. Title to all personal property or to fixtures which may be removed without damage to the Demised Property shall remain in the Tenant or in such person as may be legally entitled thereto. - Section 8. Taxes. Tenant shall pay all real property taxes resulting from Tenant's improvement and use of the Demised Property. "Real property taxes" is defined herein to include all real property taxes, possessory interest taxes and general and special taxes levied and assessed against the premises or against Tenant's improvement of and occupancy of the Demised Property. Section 9. Utilities. Tenant shall make all arrangements and pay for all water, gas, heat, light, power, telephone and other utility services supplied to the Demised Property. Section 10. Insurance; Indemnity. A. Obligations of Tenant. During the term of this Agreement, the Tenant at its own cost and expense shall: lot 273 5. (1) Keep or, cause to be kept a policy or policies of insurance against loss or damage to the Demised Property resulting from fire, lightning, vandalism, malicious mischief, riot and civil commotion, and such perils ordinarily included as risk under standard insurance policies within the classification of fire and extended coverage to the extent of full replacement value thereof; and (2) Maintain or cause to be maintained public liability insurance against claims or bodily injury or death, or damage to property occurring upon, in or about the Demised Property, such insurance to afford protection to a limit of not less than $1 million per occurrence; and (3) Maintain or cause to be maintained workers' compensation insurance issued by a responsible carrier authorized under the laws of the State of California to ensure employers against liability for compensation under the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Act now in force in California, or any act hereafter enacted as an amendment or supplement thereto or in lieu thereof. Such worker's compensation insurance shall cover all persons employed by Tenant in connection with its use of the Demised Property. B. General Provisions. All policies or certificates issued by the respective insurers for insurance as required herein shall provide that such policies or certificates shall not be canceled or materially changed without at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. Copies of such policies or certificates shall be deposited -with the City together with appropriate evidence of payment of premiums therefor. All insurance as provided under subsection A of this Section 10 shall name the City as "additional insured on said policies. At least thirty (30) days prior to expiration dates of expiring policies, copies of renewal or new policies or certificates shall be deposited with the City. Such insurance shall be primary for losses arising out of Tenant's occupancy and use of the Demised Property. Neither the City nor any of its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. Ss 273 6. • , ev • C. Indemnity and Hold Harmless. Tenant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from and against any and all claims arising from Tenant's use or occupancy of the Demised Property or from the conduct of its business or from any activity, work, or things which may be permitted or suffered by Tenant in or about the Demised Property including all damage, costs, attorney's fees, expenses and liabilities incurred in the defense of any claim or action or proceeding arising therefrom. Except for City's willful or grossly negligent conduct, Tenant hereby assumes all risk, damage to property or injury to person in or about the Demised Property from any cause, and Tenant hereby waives all claims in respect thereof against City. D. Exemption of City from Liability. Except for City's willful or grossly negligent conduct, Tenant hereby agrees that City shall not be liable for any injury to Tenant's business or loss of income therefrom or for damage to the goods, wares, merchandise - or other property of Tenant, Tenant's employees, invitees, customers or any other persons in or about the Demised Property; nor shall City be liable for injury to any such person. Section 11. Damage to the Demised Property. If the Demised Property is destroyed or damaged by any acts of war, the elements, including earthquake or fire, to such an extent as to render the Demised Property untenable in whole or in substantial part, it shall be solely the Tenant's obligation to rebuild or repair the Demised Property. Notwithstanding any provision herein, Tenant shall be responsible for all costs related to the building or repairing of the Demised Property, whether such damage is insured or uninsured. _ Section 12. Relocation. Tenant hereby acknowledges that Tenant's lawful possession of the Demised Property pursuant to this Agreement occurred after the date of the City's acquisition of the Demised Property, and that the termination of this Agreement by its terms shall not be deemed a "notice to vacate" as contemplated under Government Code Section 7260(c). Tenant, therefore, expressly agrees that Tenant has no rights whatsoever to relocation assistance and/or relocation compensation and hereby expressly waives and releases any and all claims to such relocation 273 7. assistance and/or compensation. Section 13. Default. If any rents or any part thereof, shall remain unpaid when these rents shall become due, or if Tenant violates or defaults under any of the provisions of this Agreement, then City may in its exclusive discretion,. cancel this Agreement by giving the notice required herein, and reenter the Demised Property. A waiver by the City of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Section 14. Termination and Surrender. Tenant shall surrender the Demised Property within ten (10) days from receipt of Notice of Termination of this Agreement, , or on the last day of the term of the Agreement. If Tenant shall surrender the Demised Property at the election of Tenant, the _liability for all duties and obligations required of Tenant shall continue until the surrender has been accepted by City in writing. Upon termination of this Agreement for whatever reason, Tenant agrees to immediately remove at its sole cost all of the Improvements.. constructed pursuant to this Agreement and to return the Demised Property to the condition existing prior to this Agreement, unless this provision is waived in writing by City. In the event that Tenant has failed to remove the Improvements as provided herein within one hundred twenty (120) days of the termination of this Agreement, then City may remove or cause the removal of the Improvements and Tenant shall reimburse City for all such costs of removal, including City's administrative expenses. Until paid by Tenant, said costs shall constitute a lien on the property owned by Tenant which is commonly known as 49 Pier Avenue and 53 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach. Tenant hereby agrees to execute a Memorandum of Rental Agreement in recordable form to be recorded against Tenant's property, which discloses this. provision of the Agreement. Section 15. Assignment and Sublease. ..., Tenant shall not assign this Agreement, or sell or sublet the Demised Property, or any part thereof or interest therein, without the prior written consent of City which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any attempt to sell, assign or sublet without consent of. City shall be deemed a default by Tenant. tt 273 8. • Section 16. Law Governing. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, subject to the waivers, exclusions and provisions herein contained. Section 17. Notices. All notices, statements, demands, requests, consents, approvals, authorizations, agreements, or designations hereunder by either party to the other shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given and served upon the other party, if personally served or sent by United States mail, first class, postage prepaid shall be deemed effective five (5) days after deposit in the United States Postal System, and addressed as follows: To City: City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Attention: Director of Public Works To Tenant: Jerry L. Newton and Leslie A. Newton 555 Pier Avenue, Suite 4 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 or at such other address as either shall later designate for such purpose by written notice to the other party. Section 18. Waiver. The waiver by the City of any breach by the Tenant of any term, covenant or condition hereof shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant or condition hereof. Section 19. Costs of Litigation. In the event that either the City or the Tenant shall bring or commence an action to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement or to obtain damages against the other party arising from any default under or in violation of this Agreement, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to and shall be paid reasonable attorney's fees and court costs therefor. 273 9. 3 Section 20. Severability. If any one or more of the terms, provisions, promises, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall to any extent be adjudged invalid, unenforceable, void or voidable for any reason whatsoever by any court of competent jurisdiction, each and all of the remaining terms, provisions, promises, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. Section 21. Binding Effect. This Agreement, and the terms, provisions, promises, covenants, and conditions hereof, shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE, City Attorney By: jaP 273 11. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By: 10. Leslie A. Newton t A¢A Q -47- 8. - 8. as ArzE1m 2.0 288. • �►" ( _(g• 1104.5-9 = 37.1 14. FT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 9�= 6346j410 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA 4 MIN. 8 A M. APR 10 1992 PAST. CITY OF HERMO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FEE$ DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS This declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions ("Declaration"), is made this 5th day of February, 1991 by LESLIE A. NEWTON & JERRY L. NEWTON, the owners of the hereinafter described real property in the City of Hermosa Beach, California, and hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"; WHEREAS, pursuant to the applicable provisions of the laws of the State of California and of the laws of the City of Hermosa Beach, the Owner has requested a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow the enclosure of the outside dining area located on the aerial walkway within Loreto Plaza over City owned property (Lot 23, Block 13, Hermosa Beach Tract); WHEREAS, the property subject to this Declaration is described as Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block '13, Hermosa Beach Tract, City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and known as 49-57 PIER AVENUE, Hermosa Beach, California, as per map recorded in Book 1, Pages 25-26 of Maps, Los Angeles County Records; WHEREAS, the City is willing to grant a Conditional Use Permit Amendment allowing the enclosure of the outside dining area located on the aerial walkway over said City property, subject to the following conditions imposed for the benefit of the public, and which conditions have been agreed to by the Owner freely and voluntarily and for valuable consideration, and said conditions are as contained in attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-15. 1 • • NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts stated above and of the benefit conferred thereby on the property, the Owner declares that the City of Hermosa Beach is the beneficiary of this Declaration and the Conditional Use Permit approved by the City of Hermosa Beach shall be appurtenant to said property and that the above stated use of the property is subject to the conditions, covenants and restrictions as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 91-15 (attached). Owner acknowledges that a violation of said Conditional Use Permit shall, at the option of the City of Hermosa Beach, cause any benefit granted herein to be revoked or terminated or, in the alternative, cause any condition to be enforced by order of court of competent jurisdiction or to pursue' any or all remedies available in Law or Equity, and the Owner agrees to pay to the City it's attorney fees expended in the enforcement of this Declaration, and the court may set the sum of said attorney's fees as part of any order or judgment. Said Covenant shall apply to the property described above. Further, the Owner consents and agrees that the Code Enforcement. Officer or his representative may enter the premises and building at any reasonable time for the purpose of insuring the Owner's compliance with this agreement, and only for such purpose. Unless specifically modified or terminated in writing by the City of Hermosa Beach, this Conditional Use Permit shall remain in full force and effect. The execution of this Declaration by the Owner shall be deemed for the benefit of the City of Hermosa Beach as to each provision, term and condition contained herein and shall be recorded as a covenant running with the land and which shall be prior to all encumbrances except tax liens and shall be binding upon the heirs, devisees, assigns, transferees, and successors in interest of the Owner. If any sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Declaration is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision 92 634058 • • shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Declaration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner has executed this Declaration the date and year first above writte 1./OS-A- Li9e,f California. STATE OF CALIFORNIA eslie A. Newton )ss: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On f aaLvw10 Notary Public, personally ry L. Newton , 190,7_ , before me the undersigned appeared, and �ti L . 'ne.,,,, proven to me to be the persons whose °name are subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Witness my hand and official seal the day certificate first above written. Notary Public in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California This is to OFFICEAL . HOIUSTER r • cufORFM I!! certify that the Declaration set forth above, Les4je . ewfon and signed by rre. t'y �� ip»-n,N Owners, is hereby accepted by the City of , 19 9/ dated and Hermosa Beach with instructions to the City Clerk to record said document. Date Wer.tel) /9 9R by GGG2/,6/ President of the City Council, and Mayor of the City of Hermosa=Beach 3_ 92 634058 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )ss: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On this � day of�� , l9�a before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, and known to me to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said city, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. Witness my hand and official seal the day and year in the certificate first above written. Notary Public in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California 4 OFFICIAL SEAL LAURICE M. )UKE Notary Pubour..nim PRINCIPA, • •!:E res. L. A. ::OuNly My Comm. Exp. Mn.. 12, 1993 92 634058 • May 18, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council • Regular Meeting of May 28, 1998 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the establishment of a Hermosa Beach City -School District Partnership and select two Councilmembers as representatives. Background: Mayor Edgerton and I have met with the President of the School Board, Mary Lou Weiss, and with District Superintendent, Alan Rasmussen, concerning the City and District working together on issues of mutual interest. The District has taken action to form their side of the partnership by appointing two board members. The City Council should consider the partnership and appoint two Councilmembers to serve. The partnership committee would meet at a mutually agreeable time on a regular basis to work together on various items of interest to both entities. Resp ctfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager :MAY -14-1998 09:17 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DIST 310 376 4974 P.02/03 • • HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of Trustees Alan Rasmussen, Ed.D_ District Superintendent April 15, 1998 HERMOSA BEACH CITY -SCHOOLS PARTNERSHIP BACKGWOUND INFORMATION It is recommended that the Board of Trustees approve the establishment of a Hermosa Beach City -School District Partnership and select a maximum of two Board Member representatives. BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the December meeting of the Board of Trustees, Mrs. McCurdy reported on attending the CSBA Annual Conference. At that conference she attended a workshop on City and School District Partnerships. During Roundtable discussion at the December meeting, the Board directed the superintendent to begin discussions with the City on establishing a partnership. During the past two months the superintendent, Board President Mary Lou Weiss, Hermosa Beach City Manager Steve Burrell, and Hermosa Beach Mayor Sam Edgerton have met and the City is very interested in beginning this partnership. In the discussion with Mayor Edgerton and Mr. Burrell the group felt that partnership would be most productive with two representatives from both the city council and school board along with the superintendent and city manager — with any items requiring city and/or district action being presented to the council and/or school board for approval. S-61-97/ 98 Page 1 of 1 ,.MAY -14-1998 09:18 HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DIST 310 376 4974 P.03/03 • • nn Employment Transactions — • Approval of the following certificated personnel items: Certificated Personnel: Retirement Connie Castner, Third Grade Teacher, 6/30/98 Resignations Susan Cook, First Grade Teacher, effective 6/19/98 Tracey Tatum, Fifth Grade Teacher, effective 6/19/98 Veronique Winiarski, Middle School Language Arts/Social Studies Teacher, 6/19/98 Leave of Absence Laura Wildermuth, Child Rearing Leave, September 1998 through June 1999 Employment — Substitute Teacher, effective 3/1/98 Tania Godfrey Xavier Haase Accept for Filing Initial Proposal from HBEA: • Accept for filing the initial proposal from the Hermosa Beach Educators Association (Classified Unit and Certificated Unit) for the 1998/99 Negotiations Reopeners. Motion carried, SUPERINTENDENT: RESOLUTION #12:97/98, STAFF Dr. Rasmussen stated that throughout the years the district has been APPRECIATION WEEK — MAY 4-8 recognized for their excellence in education. This excellence can be directly attributed to the exemplary staff. During the week of May 4-8 different groups are taking the opportunity to thank the staff for their efforts on behalf of the children of Hermosa Beach. CITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT PARTNERSHIP/COMPACT: It was moved by Mrs. Garcia, seconded by Mr. Kelsey, that the Board of Trustees of the Hermosa Beach City School District adopt Resolution #12:97/98 in recognition of Staff Appreciation Week, May 4-8, 1998. Motion carried. Dr. Rasmussen stated that he and Mrs. Weiss have met with Mayor Sam Edgerton and City Manager Steve Burrell regarding the establishment of a City/School District Partnership Compact. All Board members expressed interest in serving as Board Representatives on the compact. The Board agreed that they would serve on a rotating basis to allow all Board Members the opportunity to serve on the compact It was moved by Mr. Kelsey, seconded by Mrs. Rubino-Holtzinger, that the Board of Trustees establish a Hermosa Beach City -School District Partnership, select Mrs. Weiss and Mrs_ McCurdy to serve as Board representatives on the compact, and that the Board representatives will serve on a rotating basis. Motion carried. FIRST READING/ADOPTION — Dr. Rasmussen stated that the State has completed the Coordinated BOARD POLICY 1312.2, UNIFORM Compliance Review for our consolidated and special education COMPLAINT PROCEDURES: programs. In the review, they found that a section was missing from the Board Policy dealing with Uniform Complaint Procedures (Policy #1312.2). It was moved by Mrs. McCurdy, seconded by Mrs. Garcia, that the Board of Trustees of the Hermosa Beach City School District adopt revisions to Board Policy 1312.2, Uniform Compliance Procedures in according with Coordinated Compliance Review recommendations. Motion carried. 4 TOTAL P.03 • • DISTRICT / CITY / CHAMBER Possible Issues for AdHoc Committee Library Joint Facilities Use Agreements — Park / Theater / Other Safety / Crossing Guards / Drug Prevention New Employee Fingerprint Law Parks and Recreation / Teen Center Skateboarding / School Grounds vs. New Park Student Recognition Program Storm Drainage Fire/Disaster Preparedness Plan After School Care / City Program Business Solicitation Coordination Mentor Program School Newspaper / City Hall Column City Survey Joint Efforts on Legislation / Airport / 95-5 / Bond Measure / BCHD Student Government Day May 20, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 28, 1998 Recommendation: That the City Council support the passage of ACA 42 so that it will appear on the November 1998 ballot and direct that letters be sent to Senator Dills and Assemblywoman Bowen. Background: After years of take-aways by the State, the League of California Cities has sponsored ACA 42, which will protect local government revenue from further manipulation and additional take-aways by the State. In order for this to appear on the November 1998 ballot, it must receive a 2/3 majority approval in the legislature. A copy ACA 42 is attached for your information. This is an important effort and one that will help stabilize local government revenue. It would be appropriate for the City Council to urge our Assembly and Senate representatives to support placing it on the November 1998 ballot. Respectfully submitted, Stephe '' . Burrell City Manager 8 6 • • CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE -1997-98 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 42 Introduced by Assembly Member Aguiar April 15, 1998 Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 42—A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 15 of Article XI thereof, by amending Sections 24 and 29 of Article XIII thereof, by amending subdivision (a) of Section 1 of, and by adding Section 1.5 to, Article XIII A thereof, by amending Section 6 of Article XIII B thereof, and by adding Section 20 to Article XVI thereof, relating to local government finance. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST ACA 42, as introduced, Aguiar. Local government finance: authority and accountability. (1) The California Constitution requires that revenues derived from taxes imposed pursuant to the Vehicle License Fee Law or its successor be allocated to counties and cities in the manner provided by statute. This measure would modify this allocation requirement to instead require that these revenues be allocated to counties and cities in the manner prescribed by a specified statute as that statute read on January 1, 1998. This measure would also specify that no amendment or repeal of the Vehicle License Fee Law, or its successor, may take effect for any fiscal year unless the Legislature has appropriated, prior to the beginning of that fiscal year, an amount of money for 99 P ACA 42 • • — 2 — allocation to counties and cities during that fiscal year that fully offsets any reduction in the total amount of revenue that would otherwise have been allocated under the Vehicle License Fee Law. (2) The California Constitution prohibits the Legislature from imposing a tax for a local purpose but authorizes the Legislature to allow local governments to impose taxes. This measure, entitled the Taxpayer Right to Know and Government Accountability Act, would also prohibit the Legislature from reducing the amount, or redirecting the allocation, of revenue that is derived from a local general or special tax. (3) The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to allow local agencies to enter into contracts to apportion between them the revenues derived from any local sales or use tax that is collected by the state on their behalf. This measure would delete authorization by the Legislature as a condition to a sales or use tax revenue apportionment contract among local agencies. Existing statutory law, set forth in the Sales and Use Tax Law and the Bradley -Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law, permits cities and counties to impose local sales and use taxes. This measure would make the local taxing authority given to cities and counties under specified statutes a constitutional entitlement. (4) The California Constitution requires ad valorem property tax revenues to be collected by the counties and allocated among the local jurisdictions within each county as provided by law. This measure would require, subject to specified exceptions, beginning in the 1998-99 fiscal year, that ad valorem property tax revenues be apportioned according to the law in effect on the operative date of this measure. The measure would also prohibit the Legislature from modifying the proportionate share of ad valorem property tax revenue. (5) The California Constitution generally requires the state . to reimburse local governments for the costs of a new program or increased level of service mandated by the state. This measure would state the intent of this requirement. 99 P • • —3— ACA 42 (6) The California Constitution does not establish any requirements with respect to the accountability of local governments to their constituents with respect to fiscal matters. This measure would require each local government to design and conduct, in connection with each budget period, a process that provides the public with the opportunity to provide input into the development of public service goals and expenditure priorities for that budget period. This measure would also require each local government, after the close of each budget period, to issue a written report on its compliance with its public service goals and spending priorities for that period. This measure would also require each local government to undergo a financial audit upon the conclusion of each budget period and to present the results of that audit at a public meeting. Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State -mandated local program: no. 1 Resolved by the Assembly, the Senate concurring, That 2 the Legislature of the State of California at its 1997-98 3 Regular Session commencing on the second day of 4 December 1996, two-thirds of the membership of each 5 house concurring, hereby proposes to the people of the 6 State of California that the Constitution of the State be 7 amended as follows: 8 First—That the people of the State of California find 9 and declare all of the following: 10 (a) The California Constitution emphasizes the 11 importance of local control of local government fiscal 12 decisions. Articles XIII C and XIII D give taxpayers a 13 greater role in determining whether local taxes for local 14 programs should be imposed, increased, reduced, or 15 terminated. 16 (b) However, in recent years, the State has diverted 17 locally collected tax revenues from cities, counties, and 18 special districts in order to resolve its own budgetary 19 difficulties. The State should not be allowed to frustrate 20 the intent of local jurisdictions and their citizens by 99 P • • ACA 42 — 4 — 1 appropriating locally assessed and collected revenues for 2 state purposes. 3 (c) It is the intent of this measure to ensure that locally 4 collected revenues are available to fund essential city, 5 county, and special district services and that local 6 governments are held accountable for the expenditure of 7 those revenues, thereby increasing and enhancing the 8 fiscal autonomy and responsibility of local governmental 9 entities. 10 (d) Fiscal autonomy for cities, counties, and special 11 districts can be achieved in a manner that does not reduce 12 funding for schools. 13 (e) It is the further intent of this measure to 14 strengthen and clarify the requirement set forth in the 15 California Constitution that the State reimburse local 16 governments when it mandates a new program or a 17 higher level of service. 18 (f) This measure shall be known and may be cited as 19 the Taxpayer Right to Know and Governmental 20 Accountability Act. 21 Second—That Section 15 of Article XI thereof is 22 amended to read: 23 SEC. 15. (a) All revenues from taxes imposed 24 pursuant to the Vehicle License Fee Law, or its successor, 25 other than fees on trailer coaches and mobilehomes, over 26 and above the costs of collection and any refunds 27 authorized by law, shall be allocated to counties and cities 28 according to statute in the manner prescribed by Section 29 11005 of the Revenue and Taxation Code as that section 30 read on January 1, 1998. 31 (b) This section shall apply to those taxes imposed 32 pursuant to that law on and after July 1 following the 33 approval of this section by the voters No amendment or 34 repeal of the Vehicle License Fee Law, or its successor, 35 shall be operative for any fiscal year unless the 36 Legislature has appropriated, prior to the beginning of 37.. that fiscal year, an amount of money, for allocation during 38 that fiscal year to counties and cities, that fully offsets any 39 reduction in the total amount of revenues that would 40 otherwise have been allocated during that fiscal year to 99 P • • —5— ACA 42 1 local agencies pursuant to that law. After the beginning 2 of a fiscal year for which the Legislature has complied 3 with the reimbursement requirement of this subdivision, 4 no statute may be enacted that reduces or eliminates the 5 amount of that reimbursement for that fiscal year. 6 Third—That Section 24 of Article XIII thereof is 7 amended to read: 8 SEC. 24. (a) The power to impose general or special 9 taxes is vested in the voters of each local government in 10 accordance with Article XIII C. 11 (b) The Legislature may not impose taxes for local 12 purposes but may authorize local governments to impose 13 them. Money appropriated from state funds to a local 14 government for its local purposes may be used as 15 provided by law. Money subvened to a local government 16 under Section 25 may be used for State state or local 17 purposes. 18 (c) The Legislature may not reduce the amount, or 19 redirect the allocation, of the revenues raised by a local 20 general or special tax. 21 (d) This section does not authorize a city, county, or 22 city and county to impose a general or special tax that, 23 prior to the effective date of the Taxpayer Right to Know 24 and Government Accountability Act, has been 25 determined to be preempted by state law, unless the 26 enactment that gave rise to the preemption has been 27 declared unconstitutional by an appellate court or 28 repealed. 29 (e) For the purposes of this section, "general tax," 30 "special tax," and "local government" have the meanings 31 set forth in Section 1 of Article XIII C. 32 Fourth—That Section 29 of Article XIII thereof is 33 amended to read: 34 SEC. 29. The Legislature may authorize countica 35 (a) The authority granted to cities and counties by the 36 Bradley -Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law or 37 its successor to impose a sales and use tax, and the separate 38 . authority granted to cities and counties by the Sales and 39 Use Tax Law to increase the sales tax rates, pursuant to 40 the law in effect on the date the Taxpayer Right to Know 99 ACA 42 • • —6- 1 and Government Accountability Act takes effect, are 2 vested in each city and county. 3 (b) The Legislature may not reapportion or reallocate 4 the revenues from the sales and use tax imposed by any 5 city, county, or city and county pursuant to the authority 6 granted by subdivision (a). 7 (c) The Sales and Use Tax Law or its successor, 8 including any amendments made thereto on or after the 9 effective date of this subdivision, applies to the taxes 10 imposed pursuant to subdivision (a). Any amendment to 11 the Bradley -Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law 12 or its successor that exempts any product or service from 13 taxation under that law, or otherwise affects the amount 14 of revenue raised from that tax, may not become 15 operative until an identical amendment to the Sales and 16 Use Tax Law or its successor becomes operative. 17 (d) Counties, cities and counties, and cities to may 18 enter into contracts to apportion between them the 19 revenue derived from any sales or use tax imposed by 20 them which that is collected for them by the State. Before 21 any k contract for that purpose becomes operative, it 22 shall be authorized by a majority of those voting on the 23 question in each jurisdiction at a general or direct 24 primary election in each jurisdiction that is a party to that 25 contract. 26 Fifth—That subdivision (a) of Section 1 of Article 27 XIII A thereof is amended to read: 28 Section 1. (a) The maximum amount of any ad 29 valorem tax on real property shall not exceed ---One 30 percent (1%) 1 percent of the full cash value of such that 31 real property. The one percent (1%) tax to That tax shall 32 be collected by the counties county and apportioned 33 according to law to the districts jurisdictions within the 34 counties county. For purposes of the apportionment to 35 cities, counties, and special districts, "according to law" 36 means according to Section 1.5 of this article. 37 Sixth—That Section 1.5 is added to Article XIII A 38 thereof, to read: 39 SEC. 1.5. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), 40 in the 1998-99 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, 99 P • • — 7 — ACA 42 1 the revenue from the ad valorem tax on real property 2 shall be apportioned to cities, counties, and special 3 districts in accordance with the law in effect on the date 4 the Taxpayer Right to Know and Government 5 Accountability Act becomes operative. 6 (b) The proportionate share of the property tax 7 received by cities, counties, and special districts as 8 provided in subdivision (a) may be modified in 9 accordance with either of the following: 10 (1) A local determination made as part of a change of 11 organization, including an incorporation, annexation, 12 detachment, consolidation, disincorporation, or 13 dissolution. 14 (2) Section 16 of Article XVI. 15 (c) The Legislature may not modify the proportionate 16 share of property tax revenues apportioned to cities, 17 counties, or special districts. 18 (d) This section does not preclude a locally 19 determined modification of the proportionate share of 20 the property tax in accordance with a modification of 21 service responsibility. 22 (e) For purposes of this section, "special district" does 23 not include a school district or community college 24 district. 25 Seventh—That Section 6 of Article XIII B thereof is 26 amended to read: 27 SEC. 6. (a) Whenever the Legislature or any state 28 agency mandates a new program or higher level of 29 service on any local government, the State shall provide 30 a subvention of funds to reimburse steeh that local 31 government for the costs of stteh the program or 32 increased level of service, except that the Legislature 33 may, but need not, provide tel a subvention of funds for 34 the following mandates: 35 (a)- 36 (1) Legislative mandates requested by the local 37 agency affected;. 38 (b) 39 (2) Legislation defining a new crime or changing an 40 existing definition of a crimc; or 99 P • ACA 42 —8- 1 (c) crime. 2 (3) Legislative mandates enacted prior to January 1, 3 1975, or executive orders or regulations initially 4 implementing legislation enacted prior to January 1, 1975. 5 (b) It is the intent of this section, in light of the 6 restrictions imposed by Article XIII A, this article, Article 7 XIII C, and Article XIII D upon the fiscal authority of 8 local governments, to prohibit the State from shifting 9 responsibility for public programs and services to local 10 governments without providing full and timely 11 reimbursement for the additional costs incurred by local 12 governments in providing those programs and services. 13 This section shall be construed to fulfill this intent, in 14 order to ensure that local revenues are available, without 15 interference from the State, to fund local programs and 16 services, and that the State funds state -imposed programs 17 and services with its own funds. 18 Eighth—That Section 20 is added to Article XVI thereof 19 to read: 20 SEC. 20. (a) (1) In conjunction with each adoption 21 of a budget, each local government, as defined in Section 22 1 of Article XIII C, shall design and conduct a process that 23 provides the public with the opportunity to provide input 24 into the development of public service goals and 25 spending priorities for the period to which that budget 26 applies, and results in a written report of those public 27 service goals and spending priorities. 28 (2) After the close of each budget period, each local 29 government shall issue a written report that describes 30 both of the following: 31 (A) How its provision of services achieved the public 32 service goals during that period, noting any deviations 33 and the reasons therefor. 34 (B) How its expenditures during that period 35 conformed to its spending priorities for that period, 36 noting any deviations and the reasons therefor. 37 (3) Each local government shall undergo a financial 38 audit upon the conclusion of each budget period, and 39 shall present the findings of that audit at a public meeting. 99 P • • = 9 ACA 42 1 (b) (1) This section does not supersede, preempt, or 2 otherwise modify the budget and fiscal provisions of a city 3 or county charter adopted under the . authority of this 4 Constitution, including Section 3 of Article XIII C. 5 (2) The purpose of this section is to enhance the ability 6 of local taxpayers to hold their elected local officials 7 accountable with respect to the collection and 8 expenditure of local revenues. All reports and 9 information that are issued by a local government 10 pursuant to this section are public records, open for 11 public inspection. 12 Ninth—That this measure shall be liberally construed 13 to effect its purposes of enhancing local fiscal 14 self-determination and reducing the influence of the 15 State in local fiscal affairs. 16 Tenth—That the provisions of this measure are 17 severable. If any provision of this measure or its 18 application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect 19 any other provisions or applications of this measure that 20 can be given effect without the invalid provision or 21 application. In the event that a conflicting provision of , a 22 different ballot measure, approved by a greater number 23 of voters, is later held to be invalid, it is the intent of the 24 people of the State of California that those provisions of 25 this measure that are in conflict with that invalid 26 provision be reinstated and given full force and effect. 0 99 P • Mayor and Members of the City Council May 20, 1998 City Council Meeting May 28, 1998 VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS UPCOMING EXPIRATION OF TERMS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to immediately advertise and request applications from interested parties for one Civil Service Board term that will expire July 15, 1998, with appointment to be made at the regular Council meeting of July 14, 1998. Background: One term on the Civil Service Board will expire July 15, 1998. Following established procedure, this matter is being brought to the attention of Council at this time for direction with regard to advertising the upcoming term expiration. Traditionally, Council has directed that all seats on all boards and commissions be advertised. (None of the other boards or commissions have terms expiring this year.) CIVIL SERVICE BOARD One term ending July 15, 1998 This seat is currently held by John Wisdom, who has served on the Board since August 7, 1989, when he was appointed to fill an unexpired term. If interested in reapplying, Mr. Wisdom would be eligible for reappointment. Appointment will be for a four-year term ending July 15, 2002. Noted: Stephen R. Burre I' anager oerflin Cit Jerk Elaine D g, y May 19, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 28, 1998 Department of Co Activity Re mmunity Resources port for April 19 9 8 The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of April. RECREATION PROGRAMMING 1998 Spring Classes are in their final stage of registration. Outdoor classes are reaching record numbers as participants prepare for the summer. Popular outdoor classes: surfing, tennis and beach volleyball. Our youth classes are doing extremely well. Popular classes among the youth: ballet/tap, karate, tennis, beach volleyball. We are gearing up for great summer classes! Footbaq Tournament: The 1998 Southern California Footbag Championship took place at Hermosa Valley Park on Saturday and Sunday — April 4th & 5th, 1998. More than 50 of the country's top footbag athletes took place in the event. This weekend event featured freestyle, net competition, demonstration and instructional sessions. The event generated a lot of interest with 75-80 spectators. Spring Break Day and Sports Camp: April 6-10 Spring Day camp started with a bang and continued all week. Thirty-five very energetic youths between the ages of 6-12 took part in the spring break program which included crafts, sports, tour of police and fire departments, McDonalds restaurant, and a trip to Surf City Skate Zone for some skating. There was a surprise visit from Hunny Bunny the Rabbit who brought treats for everyone. Spring Eqq-Stravaqanza: Great transition from Hermosa Valley Park to the Community Center (due to rain.) Inside the gym, we held the egg hunt and in the classrooms, we had face painting, crafts, and photos with Hunny Bunny. Approximately 85-100 local youths between the ages of 0-8 attended the event. Indoor Adult Basketball League: The league began on Saturday, April 25th, and is now in full swing, with eight very highly competitive teams. Games are held in the Community Center gymnasium between the hours of 10:00 am - 3:00 pm. UPCOMING EVENTS: Here is what's happening in the Month of May and early June: May 2 Over -the -Line Tournament May 3 Dog Parade & Trick Show 1 May 13 May 17 Dan Crow Concert for kids 7 a -side Coed Soccer • • May 9 Mother's Day Tennis Tourney May 31 Getty Museum Excursion June 13 Moonlight Horseback Ride May 23-25 Fiesta de las Artes June 9 Mail/Walk-up Reg. begins June 16 Non -Resident Reg. begins Facility 4/98 User Hours 4/97 User Hours Field 223 239 Theatre 88 159 Clark 129 0* Gym 190 214 Room 8 72 159 Room 10 111 150 Room 12 110 144 Rink 103 45 *Building closed most of the month due to retrofit. DEPARTMENT REVENUE Due to the implementation of the facility reservation software system revenues are now recorded on an accrual basis. This means that the City receives but does not record revenue for rentals and/or activities that have not yet occurred. As such, month to month revenue comparisons from FY 96-97 to FY 97-98 are of little utility in assessing progress this Fiscal Year. Staff will re -introduce month to month comparisons during the second half of FY 98-99 and will also do an end -of -the -year comparison this Fiscal Year so that our progress can be measured. REVENUE FY 1997-98 for 83% of the Fiscal Year is: $399,529.61 or 81% of the projected figure of $490,075. EXPENDITURE FY 1997-98 for 83% of the Fiscal Year is: $454,241.17 or 79% of the projected figure of $573,064. Resp=ctfully b4mitted, Je ome J• nson R •creation Specialist 2 Concur: Mary Dire ey munity Resources Stephen City Mana rell • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION APRIL, 1998 MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT = NUMBER OFPERMITS CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING 84 30 542 337 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 29 16 251 213 ELECTRIC 28 22 247 156 PLAN CHECK 33 10 205 117 SEWER USE 5 2 23 17 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 44 38 347 265 PARKS & RECREATION 0 0 3 12 IN LIEU PARKING & REC 10 0 25 7 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 0 SIGN REVIEW 0 0 25 19 FIRE FLOW FEES 18 3 91 46 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 3 0 3 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 1 0 3 20 653 TOTALS 2 TOTALS 176,270.02 $25,353. ,.,.,.,. PERMIT' FEES CURRENT MONTH . __ THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE BUILDING $57,388.43 $8,000.05 $288,191.61 $126,157.84 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL 2,421 1,644.30 23,988.30 14,804.20 ELECTRIC 3,627 3,300.10 _ 29,764.70 15,692.15 PLAN CHECK 39,514.20 3,291.83 183,984.45 114,291.71 SEWER USE 3,173.39 4,012.60 42,442.56 27,391.59 RES. BLDG. REPORTS 1,980 1,631.70 15,556.50 11,608.20 PARKS & RECREATION 0 0 10,500 42,000 IN LIEU PARKING & REC. 48,168 0 123,712 15,386 BOARD OF APPEALS 0 0 0 0 SIGN REVIEW 0 0 2,218.70 1,664.45 FIRE FLOW FEES 19,965 2,109.50 119,126 35,027 LEGAL DETERMINATION 0 1,363.03 0 1,363.03 ZONING APPEALS 0 0 0 0 TEMPORARY SIGN 33 0 99 653 _ _ ........ .........., d.wnc non 47 TOTALS 176,270.02 $25,353. ,.,.,.,. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT / BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED REPORT MONTH OF APRIL, 1998 TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS DWELLING UNITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1 101 NEW SINGLE DWELLINGS 13 13 $2,994,061.12 2 102 NEW SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED 3 103 NEW TWO FAMILY BUILDING 4 104 NEW 3 OR 4 FAMILY BUILDING 2 6 1,388,103.12 5 105 NEW 5 OR MORE FAMILY BUILDING 6 213 NEW HOTEUMOTEL 7 214 NEW OTHER NON HOUSEKEEPING 8 318 NEW AMUSEMENT & RECREATION 9 319 NEW CHURCH/OTHER 10 320 NEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 11 321 NEW PARKING GARAGE (PUBLIC) 12 322 NEW SERVICE SFR/REPAIR GARAGE 1 556,170 13 323 NEW HOSPITAUOTHER INSTITUTIONAL 14 324 NEW OFFICE/BANK 15 325 NEW PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITY BLDG. 16 326 NEW SCHOOL/OTHER EDUCATIONAL 17 327 NEW STORE/OTHER MERCH BLDG. 18 328 NEW OTHER NON RESIDENTIAL BLDG. 19 329 NEW STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BLDG. 5 11,600 20 434 ADD/ALTER DWELLING/POOL 45 662,458.36 21 437 ADD/ALTER NON RESIDENTIAL 6 19,250 22 438 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES/CARPORTS 23 645 DEMOLITION -SFR* 6 6 3,000 24 646 DEMO 2 SFR* 4 8 2,000 25 647 DEMO 3-4 SFR* 26 648 DEMO 5+ BLDG.* 27 649 DEMO ALL OTHER BLDG. spa, demo* 1 500 TOTAL PERMITS: 83 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: $5,637,142.60 *TOTAL UNITS DEMOLISHED TO DATE: 60 (See Attached List) TOTAL NET UNITS TO DATE: 13 Dwelling Units Demolished from July, 1997 to April, 1998 ADDRESS TYPE PERMIT DATE PERMIT NO. No. OF UNIT 123 Lyndon Street Duplex 4/7/98 B98-175 2 133 Lyndon Street Duplex 4/7/98 B98-176 2 137 Lyndon Street Duplex 4/7/98 B98-177 2 145 Lyndon Street Duplex 4/7/98 898-178 2 611 9th Street SFR 4/8/98 B98-190 1 451 29th Street SFR 4/14/98 B98-200 1 2720 El Oeste Street SFR 4/16/98 B98-207 1 306 Monterey Blvd. SFR 4/29/98 B98-241 1 1716 Manhattan Avenue SFR 4/29/98 B98-242 1 240 Monterey Blvd. SFR 4/29/98 B98-243 1 667 Longfellow Ave. SFR 3/5/98 B98-106 1 646 2nd Street 1 Unit of The Duplex 3/10/98 698-110 1 646 1/2 2nd Street 1 Unit of The Duplex 3/10/98 698-111 1 1940 Loma Drive SFR 3/16/98 B98-119 1 531 25th Street SFR 3/18/98 B98-125 1 140 Monterey Blvd. Duplex 3/24/98 B98-136 2 1513 Manhattan Ave. SFR 3/26/98 B98-148 1 1153 7th Place Duplex 3/26/98 B98-149 2 1215 7th Place Duplex 3/26/98 B98-150 2 653 9th Street SFR 3/30/98 B98-153 1 217 29th Street SFR 2/5/98 B98-50 1 2162 Circle Drive SFR 2/5/98 B98-60 1 645 2nd Street SFR 2/5/98 B98-61 1 651 2nd Street SFR 2/5/98 B98-62 1 711 Loma Drive SFR 2/9/98 B98-63 1 925 2nd Street SFR 2/23/98 B98-85 1 1925 Bayview Drive SFR 2/26/98 B98-93 1 334 28th Street SFR 12/4/97 B97-569 1 712 Marlita Place SFR 11/4/97 B97-523 1 1237 10th Street SFR 11/13/97 B97-535 1 2046 Hermosa Avenue SFR 11/18/97 B97-543 1 905 15th Street SFR 10/14/97 B97-465 1 345 29th Street SFR 10/15/97 B97-466 1 402 The Strand SFR 10/16/97 897-468 1 550 24th Street SFR 10/16/97 B97-469 1 445 Monterey Place 5 Unit Apts. 9/24/97 697-419 5 901 8th Place SFR 9/29/97 B97-421 1 609 30th Street SFR 8/14/97 B97-326 1 613 30th Street Duplex 8/14/97 B97-327 2 1522 The Strand SFR 8/19/97 B97-338 1 925 17th Street SFR 8/20/97 B97-346 1 2920 Amby Place SFR 8/27/97 B97-355 1 2130 Loma Drive SFR 7/2/97 B97-250 1 1550 Monterey Blvd. SFR 7/10/97 B97-261 1 1244 9th Street SFR 7/14/97 B97-262 1 602 5th Street SFR 7/14/97 B97-264 1 226 Monterey Blvd. SFR 7/24/97 697-282 1 1116 Prospect Avenue SFR 7/28/97 B97-287 1 Total Units Demolished f:b95\cd\activity\p.5 9 60 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL May 19, 1998 Regular Meeting of May 28, 1998 ACTIVITY REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION APRIL, 1998 STAFF REPORT PREPARED SUBJECT THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE: APPEAL / RECONSIDERATION 0 0 4 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 2 2 20 13 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) 1 1 1 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 0 2 5 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION/REVOCATION 0 0 0 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MAP EXTENSION 0 0 0 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 1 FINAL MAP 1 0 13 5 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1 0 3 9 HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 0 0 0 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 0 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 2 2 8 8 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 1 4 3 PARKING PLAN 0 0 6 2 SPECIAL STUDY 0 0 4 1 SUBDIVISION 0 0 0 1 TEXT AMENDMENT 0 1 7 7 TRANSIT 0 0 1 0 VARIANCE 1 0 5 3 ZONE CHANGE 0 0 0 3 MISCELLANEOUS 6 0 48 42 TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED 15 9 129 119 NOTE: A staff report may be written for one or more of the items listed above, but it will be listed and counted only once. WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP PASSENGERS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE HERMOSA BEACH 850 981 8931 10216 REDONDO BEACH 4554 4929 52687 52412 SATELLITE 505 533 4944 4983 • • The following Activities were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council / Initiated by 1. Text amendment to modify M-1 zone permitted use list. / City Council 2. Text amendment to change zoning violations from misdemeanors to infractions and administrative with few exceptions. / Staff CONCUR: Sol Blumen Community N.TED: -I•, Director u evelopment Department Stephen F Urrell City Manager f:\b95\cd\activity Respectfully submitted, u-Ying`Tin� Administrative Aide r • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, APRIL 1998 May 19, 1998 City Council Meeting of May 28, 1998 STATISTICAL SECTION Finance Administration ;:.•:.v :::,rw:r: .f t A5 RE T 1568 ' # 1 ,3tf! • , �3 R ....:...�:. ...:...,�::.,�. rrrw.r,Vv::;F:.r• t:...r.lw:.v..-ww..:.r.:w.,.,-.w�.w....w�.:a.:.r:x<a:. w. .:,v......�.+.,•.w..•.+w..w:.,:::�'.✓.c:,�vcva:.:,, w..w,v.�r..•.::. w.,,�.r.. w.w a: :....t:.. r.::.:,•. .w.:.... ........: .:.....:. (HE K 1 SL 'fCHA:DE ...S: [DISCOUNTS TAKEN 149 �•�. _ Asx :ars .t ' •:U •i.r,.y:.},v,•.vr ••x:l+(Hf^•f': ,t< ri�nh'N!F ifaiLCtiL�; liWKLLGUUYYfk�!!: N+!^'Mlf: fi% r:L4 w: r/q +Ktwr. I.ri/ •! + wn....:. f f rrn wfN r.�i}+f ifriJr'iwveiwrw:iiiiwwwwirr..r ..lf.. rr::': rr+r.rir+rirr:vr•+miri++h:•:viV+rR /+rrrrxx�xiiiv�rr+:.vrrrrvv. Full Time Employees ......:.:.:.......::..::.:.. Pit# rrEmployees 132 1 .wrArr.�rn..r:ww.,.r. wfr..., :•«... wwwr wrw rwrwr. r+rrrrr .::wrr. w 130 • • Finance Cashier • , .cITATION PAYMENTS....a 34172 4O,( .... •* California 1,957 1,804 18,059 -2175-19- Out of State 257 1,071 4,343 3,799 Dnvewav . ........ r ••• 30 0 8 16 Guest Party Passes 189 206 3,014 2,944 Contractor 29 11 130 93 Daily. . . 7 0 13 24 . aIt DT Employee 26 0 143 O Transferable 272 298 3,709 3,165 ........,.....,.....,0091p... ............ .... ... 251...„.,.................................... .......87.... ...„ . . ...4,,015 .. .......................:.....V46. tOTALE:iiir.:.:1•7.:;;;Ii;i::i.;.1!:Oiiiiiiiiii;iiiiiii.ii549..,iii;iiiii;iiAiiiiiiii0iligOilIi,.E;i68:6iE'':.: 1.,:•-..,:ii.:-',11iiii.:::::i jiiiiiiii:1118.0:10P:iiin:!i:::'i::1!::ENTIffili8lAliti Licenses Issued 211 161 2,014 1,801 NOTED: Stephen R. Burr City Manager Respectfully submitted: Viki Copeland, Finance Director 2 f\b95\open/mar98rptdoc HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1998 APRIL 1998 THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE INSPECTIONS AND PREVENTION ORIGINAL INSPECTION COMMERCIAL ASSEMBLY INSTITUTIONS INDUSTRIAL APARTMENTS RE -INSPECTION COMMERCIAL ASSEMBLY INSTITUTIONS INDUSTRIAL APARTMENTS 25 72 115 187 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 54 27 181 14 20 32 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 28 14 78 0 AMBULANCE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997/98 APRIL 1998 INVOICE BILLING FOR AMBULANCE SERVICE THIS MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CURRENT MONTH BILLINGS F/Y TO DATE RESIDENTS 17 204 $4,029. $47,971. NON-RESIDENTS 11 167 $5,203. $78,747. TOTALS 28 371 $9,232 $126,718. Respectfully Submitted: PETE BONANO, FIRE CHIEF Noted: • • HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGE NO. 1 05/05/1998 INCIDENT RECAP Dates: 04/01/1998 to 04/30/1998, Incidents: All Description Number Average Loss Value Response All 85 3.58 Fires 4 4.50 25,700 Structure Fires 3 5.00 25,700 Medical Emergencies (with patients) 48 3.27 Hazardous Materials 2 5.50 Other (includes mutual aid) 31 3.81 NOTE: Since incidents can be coded with up to 4 situations found, an incident may be counted more than once. • • HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGE NO. 1 05/05/1998 INCIDENT RECAP Dates: 01/01/1998 to 04/30/1998, Incidents: All Description Number Average Loss Value Response All 349 3.24 Fires 14 3.43 72,050 Structure Fires 7 3.86 71,950 Medical Emergencies (with patients) 215 2.98 Hazardous Materials 5 5.20 Other (includes mutual aid) 115 3.61 NOTE: Since incidents can be coded with up to 4 situations found, an incident may be counted more than once. • • HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGE NO. 1 05/05/1998 DAY OF WEEK/DISPATCH TIME RECAP All Incidents Dates: 04/01/1998 to 04/30/1998, Incidents: All Time Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total 0000 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0100 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0200 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0400 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0500 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0600 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0700 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 4 0800 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0900 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 3 1000 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 1100 2 2 1 2 0 2 2 11 1200 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1300 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 1400 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 5 1500 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 3 1600 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1700 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 4 1800 1 0 4 3 2 0 4 14 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2000 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 2100 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 2200 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 4 2300 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total 12 13 8 16 6 13 17 85 • • HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGE NO. 1 05/05/1998 DAY OF WEEK/DISPATCH TIME RECAP All Incidents Dates: 01/01/1998 to 04/30/1998, Incidents: All Time Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total 0000 1 4 2 1 2 0 5 15 0100 8 2 1 1 1 1 4 18 0200 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 6 0300 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 4 0400 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 0500 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 4 0600 1 0 3 2 3 3 2 14 0700 2 3 3 3 0 0 1 1,2 0800 7 2 2 1 0 4 3 19 0900 1 4 2 1 4 0 3 15 1000 4 2 0 2 3 3 3 17 1100 4 3 5 3 1 3 4 23 1200 2 3 3 0 2 3 5 18 1300 1 2 2 1 2 6 3 17 1400 3 3 5 3 2 2 4 22 1500 2 2 4 2 2 0 2 14 1600 0 2 3 1 1 5 2 14 1700 2 0 2 6 1 3 2 16 1800 2 1 8 3 2 0 7 23 1900 1 3 0 2 1 3 4 14 2000 9 2 2 1 1 1 6 22 2100 1 4 1 1 2 2 4 15 2200 0 1 1 2 4 2 1 11 2300 3 0 0 0 1 2 2 8 Total 59 45 51 36 37 44 77 349 • • HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGE NO. 1 05/05/1998 RECAP OF PRIMARY SITUATION FOUND All Incidents Dates: 04/01/1998 to 04/30/1998, Incidents: All Code Number Percent Description ** 1 11 7 8.24 STRUCTURE FIRE 14 1 1.18 VEHICLE FIRE 16 2 2.35 REFUSE FIRE OUTSIDE ** Subtotal 10 11.77 ** 2 25 1 1.18 EXCESSIVE HEAT, OVERHEAT SCORCH BURNS, NO IGNITION ** Subtotal 1 1.18 ** 3 31 1 1.18 EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSIST 32 50 58.82 EMERGENCY MEDICAL CALL 35 1 1.18 PEOPLE TRAPPED, CAUGHT, BURIED ** Subtotal 52 61.18 ** 4 40 1 1.18 UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 41 1 1.18 FLAMMABLE GAS OR LIQUID CONDITION 42 1 1.18 TOXIC CONDITION 44 1 1.18 ELECTRICAL ARCING, SHORTED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 46 1 1.18 VEHICLE ACCIDENT, POTENTIAL ACCIDENT ** Subtotal 5 5.90 ** 5 50 1 1.18 UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 52 1 1.18 WATER PROBLEM 53 1 1.18 SMOKE, ODOR PROBLEM 55 2 2.35 PUBLIC SERVICE ASSISTANCE ** Subtotal 5 5.89 ** 6 61 2 2.35 INCIDENT CLEARED PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 66 2 2.35 EMS CALL, TRANSPORTED/LEFT SCENE PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 67 1 1.18 HAZMAT INVESTIGATION, NO HAZARDOUS CONDITION FOUND ** Subtotal 5 5.88 ** 7 73 4 4.71 SYSTEM MALFUNCTION 74 3 3.53 UNINTENTIONAL ** Subtotal 7 8.24 *** Total 85 100.04 • • HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGE NO. 1 05/05/1998 RECAP OF PRIMARY SITUATION FOUND All Incidents Dates: 01/01/1998 to 04/30/1998, Incidents: All Code Number Percent Description ** 0 00 3 0.86 UNDETERMINED OR NOT REPORTED ** Subtotal 3 0.86 ** 1 11 14 4.01 STRUCTURE FIRE 14 1 0.29 VEHICLE FIRE 16 4 1.15 REFUSE FIRE OUTSIDE 17 4 1.15 OTHER OUTSIDE FIRE ** Subtotal 23 6.60 ** 2 22 1 0.29 AIR, GAS RUPTURE 25 4 1.15 EXCESSIVE HEAT, OVERHEAT SCORCH BURNS, NO IGNITION ** Subtotal 5 1.44 ** 3 31 5 1.43 EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSIST 32 212 60.74 EMERGENCY MEDICAL CALL 33 2 0.57 LOCK -IN 35 4 1.15 PEOPLE TRAPPED, CAUGHT, BURIED ** Subtotal 223 63.89 ** 4 40 1 0.29 UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 41 2 0.57 FLAMMABLE GAS OR LIQUID CONDITION 42 3 0.86 TOXIC CONDITION 44 9 2.58 ELECTRICAL ARCING, SHORTED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 46 3 0.86 VEHICLE ACCIDENT, POTENTIAL ACCIDENT 49 1 0.29 NOT CLASSIFIED ** Subtotal 19 5.45 ** 5 50 1 0.29 UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 51 1 0.29 PERSON IN DISTRESS 52 8 2.29 WATER PROBLEM 53 2 0.57 SMOKE, ODOR PROBLEM 55 9 2.58 PUBLIC SERVICE ASSISTANCE 57 2 0.57 COVER ASSIGNMENT, STANDBY AT FIRE STATION, MOVE -UP 59 1 0.29 NOT CLASSIFIED ** Subtotal 24 6.88 ** 6 61 11 3.15 INCIDENT CLEARED PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 62 1 0.29 WRONG LOCATION 63 1 0.29 CONTROLLED BURNING • • HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGE NO. 2 05/05/1998 RECAP OF PRIMARY SITUATION FOUND All Incidents Dates: 01/01/1998 to 04/30/1998, Incidents: All Code Number Percent Description 64 2 0.57 VICINITY ALARM 65 2 0.57 STEAM, OTHER GAS MISTAKEN FOR SMOKE 66 2 0.57 EMS CALL, TRANSPORTED/LEFT SCENE PRIOR TO ARRIVAL 67 1 0.29 HAZMAT INVESTIGATION, NO HAZARDOUS CONDITION FOUND 69 1 0.29 NOT CLASSIFIED ** Subtotal 21 6.02 ** 7 70 1 0.29 UNABLE TO CLASSIFY FURTHER 71 2 0.57 MALICIOUS, MISCHIEVOUS FALSE CALL 73 14 4.01 SYSTEM MALFUNCTION 74 8 2.29 UNINTENTIONAL ** Subtotal 25 7.16 ** 8 82 5 1.43 FLOOD ** Subtotal 5 1.43 ** 9 99 1 0.29 NOT CLASSIFIED ** Subtotal 1 0.29 *** Total 349 100.02 • May 5, 1998 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 26, 1998 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT Activity Report —April 1998 CURRENT THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY STATISTICS MONTH LAST YEAR DATE TO DATE Worker Comp Claims Claims opened 4 2 25 28 Claims closed 2 0 55 29 Total open 53 82 Current Employee 22 33 Active Cases 5 2 Lost time (hours) Safety Fire 648 792 144 2010 2342 Police 144 Non -Safety 2 180 999 1106 Liability Claims Claims opened 4 1 19 17 Claims closed 2 2 14 19 Total open 22 13 Employee -Involved Vehicle Accidents Safety Non -safety Employee Turnover Safety Non -safety 0 2 1 1 0 4 1 0 2 2 0 4 2 0 4 2 Respectfully subs•' ichael A Earl, Direc or ersonnel & Risk Management City Manager No StepHe(i R. Burrell ACT2 fT "A HEISA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMEN• MONTHY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1998 APRIL, 1998 APRIL APRIL YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE 1998. 1997 1998 1997 OFFENSES REPORTED MURDER *1 0 1 0 RAPE 0 0 0 2 ROBBERY 3 1 7 7 ASSAULT 8 6 27 31 Burglaries(Vehicle) 3 5 22 17 Burglaries(Residential) 3 7 12 24 Burglaries(Commercial) 1 1 2 6 BURGLARY(Total) 7 13 36 47 LARCENY 33 40 104 162 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 10 6 30 40 DUI 7 21 47 80 ALL OTHER OFFENSES 72 236 253 993 PERSONS ARRESTED ADULTS 34 69 192 241 JUVENILES 1 1 2 10 CRIMINAL CITATIONS 39 53 184 225 BICYCLE/SKATEBOARD CITES 0 0 0 2 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORTS Fatal 0 0 1 0 Injury 3 6 24 20 Property Damage Only 20 17 61 74 CITATIONS Traffic 285 316 1,254 1,068 Parking 0 2 0 18 DISTURBANCE CALLS 90 246 686 1,043 POLICE CALLS FOR SERVICE 8,224 1,472 2,221 6,345 * = Attempted Page 1 • • 1 n HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1998 APRIL, 1998 APRIL APRIL YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE 1998 1997 1998 1997 PARKING ENFORCEMENT PARKING CITATIONS ISSUED 4165 4076 16266 16961 BOOTS 2 8 11 26 VEHICLE IMPOUNDS 17 41 92 162 CALLS FOR SERVICE 110 165 445 555 ANIMAL CONTROL 8 18 64 51 CITATIONS ISSUED CALLS FOR SERVICE 50 98 310 256 ANIMAL PICK UPS 43 41 142 127 • OF THESE RETURNED TO OWNER 7 10 28 23 TAKEN TO SHELTER 15 3 54 20 INJURED, TAKEN TO VET 1 0 7 1 DECEASED 18 23 47 75 RETURNED TO WILD 2 5 6 8 Respecfully Submitted to: City Manag- - St` e Burr II JP/ By: Chief of e - Val Straser VCtif -4,7;1'40,1 Prepared by: Records Manager - Ruth Miller Content approved by: Division Commander A/Lt. Tom Thompson Page 2 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 18, 1998 Regular Meeting of May 28, 1998 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - APRIL 1998 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager, this includes engineering and management of Capital Improvements Projects. PERMITS ISSUED Type of Permit Current Month 97 - 98 To Date Last FY Month 96 - 97 To Date Sewer Demolition 3 15 0 6 Sewer Lateral 0 15 2 10 Street Excavation 6 49 7 28 Utility Companies Only 10 167 21 167 Dumpster/Misc. 7 41 2 22 Banner Permits 5 23 6 24 ENGINEERING The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 93-145 Utility Undergrounding CIP 94-160 Downtown Improvement Project CIP 93-302 NPDES Storm Water Management CIP 97-303 Storm Drain Construction, Beach Drive 13th Street to 14th Street, turning west to the beach CIP 96-508 Greenbelt Improvements 1 It a • CIP 97-526 Skateboard Track At Community Center CIP 95-620 Hermosa Beach Pier Renovation CIP 95-622 City Hall ADA Requirements CIP 96-624 Parking Structure (Lot C) CIP 97-625 Replace Underground Fuel Tanks MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: • Parks/Medians • Street Maintenance/Building Maintenance • Sewers/Storm Drains • Street Lighting • Traffic Safety • Equipment Service Parks/Medians Division: Sand removal on the Strand. Repair damage at roller hockey rink. Remove debris from 5th/Ardmore. Repair fences at tennis courts and lawn bowling. Repair park equipment. Fertilize palm trees on Pier Plaza. Repair park irrigation. Assist with asphalt street repairs. Ongoing median maintenance. Street Maintenance/Building Maintenance Division: Repair fence at Bicentennial Park. Repair gas line at Community Center. Graffiti removal. Update marquee at the Community Center. Remove sand from Strand. Repair pot holes City wide. Repair roof at bowling green. Start City wide sandbag pickup. Repair Street at 15th/Hermosa Ave. Repair concrete streets at Pine/6th and 900 block of 8th Street. Repair barricades at 3rd/Beach and 14th/PCH. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Clean storm drains. Move sand from Strand wall. Maintain pump stations. Clean/video 30th Street line. Installed new poles at 13th outfall. Repair old sweeper. Meet with exterminator. Remove volleyball poles for County burm removal. Repair Pier restrooms. Street Lighting Division: Install new bulbs at City Hall inside and outside. Repair street lights. Install new banners. Repair theater lights. Assist the School District with light repairs. Start beach restroom light repairs. Repair South Park lights. Install new circuit at Fire Dept. Install new outlets at Community Center. Traffic Safety Division: Install T's & L's at 10th/Monterey, 100 block of Manhattan Ave., Longfellow, and 16th/Monterey. Assist with volleyball pole removal. Assist with asphalt repairs. Remove sand from Strand. Install reflectors/double line at Longfellow. Assist with storm drain repairs at 13th/Beach Drive. Equipment Service Division: Ongoing equipment and vehicle maintenance and repair. Graffiti Removal: • FY 96-97 JULY 1996 AUGUST 1996 SEPTEMBER 1996 OCTOBER 1996 NOVEMBER 1996 DECEMBER 1996 JANUARY 1997 FEBRUARY 1997 MARCH 1997 APRIL 1997 MAY 1997 JUNE 1997 YTD TOTAL: Respectfully submitted: 12.00 Hours 11.00 Hours 43.50 Hours 25.50 Hours 19.00 Hours 25.00 Hours 22.50 Hours 22.50 Hours 26.00 Hours 93.50 Hours 29.00 Hours 27.50 Hours 357.00 Hours Barbara Conklin Administrative Aide, Public Works Noted: Stephen R City Manage 3 FY 97-98 JULY 1997 AUGUST 1997 SEPTEMBER 1997 OCTOBER 1997 NOVEMBER 1997 DECEMBER 1997 JANUARY 1998 FEBRUARY 1998 MARCH 1998 APRIL 1998 YTD TOTAL: Concur: 26.75 Hours 40.75 Hours 10.00 Hours 7.50 Hours 0 Hours 20.50 Hours 28.50 Hours 6.00 Hours 13.50 Hours 23.50 Hours 177.00 Hours arold C. Williams, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer be/moact 44 LAWN EL 101.0' 12'-0" t -p LAWN .PLANTER} ELEV '104.6' • UNIT B I I ;OHC WALT EL 106.1' ' FENCE AND .GATE 10'-0" REAR YARD PLAN . r , • PROVIDE A CORROSION RESISTANT WEEP SCREED @ FOUNDATION PLATE MNIMUM HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 4"MIN ALL WORKS SHALL CONFORM TO UNIFORM BUILDING CODE LATEST ADDITION ALL WOOD IN DIRECT CONTACT W/ MASONARY OR CONC. AT A POINT WITHIN 48" OF THE GROUND SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED W/MIN APPROVED PRESERVATIVE OR SHALL BE DURABLE WOOD FDN. GR REDWOOD OR WESTERN RED CEDAR MUDSILL WITHIN 6" OF GRADE SHALLBE PRESSURE TREATED. UNDERFLOOR VENTILATION EQUAL TO 2 S.F. OF NET VENT AREA FOR EA 25 LIN FT. OF EXT. WALL SHALL BE PROVIDED ON3 SIDES OF THE BUILDING & IN INTERIOR FTG. WALLS. ACCESS OPENINGS 18" X24" WIDE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ALL AREAS OF UNDERFLOOR SPACE. _ ALL EXTERIOR COLORS AND LOCATIONS TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO START OF WORK PROVIDE STREET ADDRESS PER CITY CODE: HT -4", WIDTH • 2", THICKNESS =3/8" ORAS OTHERWISE REQUIRED. . BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS TO BE PROVIDED ON THE FRONT OF ALL BUILDINGS AND SHALL BE VISIBLE , AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. SAID NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. VARIATIONS: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AND REPORT ANY VARIATIONS TO THE OWNER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL INTERIOR IN-PLACE LATH AND/OR WALLBOARD BEFORE ANY FINISH MATERIAL IS APPLIED 4 A SMOKE DETECTOR SHALLBE INSTALLED IN THE BASEMENT OF THE DWELLING. SUCH DETECTOR SHALL BE CONNECTED TO A SOUNDING DEVICE OR OTHER DETECTOR TO PROVIDE ALARM WHICH WILL BE AUDIBLE IN THE SLEEPING AREAS. GLAZING IN SHOWER & TUB ENCLOSURESS SHALL BE TEMP ERED,LA MINATED OR APPROVED PLASTIC WITHIN 5 FEETOTUB OR SHOWER FLOOR. ATTIC VENTILATION EQUAL TO 1)150 OF SPACE VENTILATED , SHALL BE' PROVIDED OR AS REQUIRED FOR FORCED AIR UNIT • PASSAGEWAY TO THE ATTIC FURNACE SHALL BE UNOBSTRUCTED & HAVE A CONTINUOUS SOLID FLOOR NOT LESS THAN 24' WIDE AND HAVE A PERMANENT ELECTRICAL OUTLET & LIGHT FIXTURE CONTROLLED BY A SWITCH FOR THE ATTIC FURNANCE. PROVIDE ACCESS TO ATTIC A MINIMUM OF, 30" X 30" ACCESS PANEL • CLOTHES DRYER SHALL BE VENTILATED TO THE OUTSIDE OF BLDG. CLOTHES DRYER EXHAUST DUCT IS , LIMITED TO 14' W/2 ELBOWS. THIS LENGE& SHALL BE REDUCED BY 2' FOR EA ELBOW IN EXCESS OF TWO. ALL HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL HAVE 8•-0" CEILING HEIGHT(U.N.0.) WITH A MINIMUM HEIGHT SHALL BE 7'-61",ALL OTHER ROOMS MIN.7'-0" I ' EVERY DWELLING UNMAND GUEST ROOM SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH HEATING FACILITIES CAPABLE OF MAINTAINING A ROOM TEMPERATURE OF 70 DEGREES F. @ A POINT 3' ABOVE THE FLOOR IN HABITABLE ROOMS. ' ' EAVES SHALLBE AT LEAST 30" FROM PROPERTY LINES. 'PLUMBING: ,ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING SHALL BE CAST IRON UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY LOCAL BLDG OFFICAL 2% MIN SLOPE FOR DRAINAGE PIPING ELECTRICAL: i ELECTRICAL SYSTEM TO BE GROUNDED.. CONVENIENCE OULETS IN BATHROOM,KITCHENCOUNTERTOPS WITHIN 6' OF SINK,OUTDOORS,GARAGE AND BASEMENTS SHALL BE GFI PROTECTED • r GARAGES:. - - - j . .1 ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE PROTECTION OF WALLS,CEIUNGS,POST, AND BEAMS ADJACENT TO OR SUPPORTING THE DWELLING GARAGE WALLS LESS THAN 3 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY UNE SHALL HAVE ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION WITH NO OPENINGS. .a SELF CLOSING TIGHT FITTING SOLID CORE 20 MIN DOOR - 1 3/8" THICK DOOR AT OPENINGS INTO DWELLING SHALLBE PROVIDED. OP ENABLE WINDOW BETWEEN CARPORT AND DWELLING ARE NOT PERMITTED. APPLIANCES IN GARAGE SHALLBE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR DAMAGE,WHEEEL BLOCKS ARE NOT SUFFICIENT. PROVIDE APPROVED SAFETY TYPE DOOR SPRI NGS. ALL GARAGES SHALL HAVE A MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT OF 7'-0" EXCEPT WHEN DOOOR IS IN THE OPEN POSITION. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF TWO 6"X14' VENTS WITH BIRD SCREEN FOR EACH GARAGE. 9 I DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OWNER: 11r1N KARAgnrr7 R40 TSTr1 FOREFT.UERM061A PROJECT LOCATION: 840 15TH STREET,HER14DWA 'A` TACHNMENT 2 RESUBMITTAL 5/21/98 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 25 HEFFNERFIERIN' -TRACT MB 9-106 ZONING DESIGNATION: R -2B • . GENERAL BUILDING -INFORMATION LOT AREA: 56705 "Et"' TOTAL BUILDING AREA }. TONING INFORMATION REQUIRED PROVIDED AREA: UNIT.1 .(A) . UNIT 2(B) UNIT3 '. UNIT4. 1ST LEVEL LIVING AREA 348.25 508 531" 50 555 " N.A. N.A. GARAGE. 2ND LEVEL LIVING AREA 1479 50 • 1291.2.5. 36 1 LF OF PERIMETER <6' FROM GRADE TO F.F. ABOVE - DECKS/BALCONIES 3RD LEVEL LIVING AREA 1227 .11351,75—_.-.' 26Q ; ., ' Sl t> DECKS/BALCONIES 220.5 TOTAL LIVING AREA (10154. 25 424.5 2961 ' 4512.25 - 5' • TOTAL DECKS/BALCONIES NO. OF BEDROOMS 4 - 40' NO. OF BATHROOMS 1 1 /7 l 10 _ 4 TONING INFORMATION REQUIRED PROVIDED AREA: BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 LOT AREA PER DWELLING UNIT .1750 1ST LEVEL F.F. ELEVATION 101.6 28315 LOT COVERAGE 16RS 5 LINEAL FEET(LF) OF PERIMETER 126 • 1944.75/142 YARDS: 1 LF OF PERIMETER <6' FROM GRADE TO F.F. ABOVE - 65 FRONT 17 • Sl t> 17' SIDE 4.2 • 5' • REAR 7 - 40' PARKING AND DRIVEWAYS: NUMBER OF SPACES 4 5(2 ADD@ MITT A) GUEST SPACES 1 -1(7 0 ;MITT A) PARKING SETBACK 17 PARKING STALL DIMENSION . r 9.52X 20l , R 20 TURNING AREA . X2101. DRIVEWAY WIDTH q' - Loi' DRIVEWAY MAXIMUM SLOPE 12 1/2 12 1/T OPEN SPACE: TOTAL 600 306 5 + 534 5=841 PRIVATE (PER UNIT) , . 200 UNIT 1: 286 UNIT 2: 2491:5 UNIT 3: UNIT 4. PRIVATE STORAGE SPACE: CUBIC FEET PER UNIT - 200 UNIT 1: 4E) UNIT 22> iS 229 UNIT 3: UNIT 4: • BASEMENT QUALIFICATION CALCULATION • BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 BUILDING 3 - BUILDING 4 1ST LEVEL F.F. ELEVATION 101.6 104_5 LINEAL FEET(LF) OF PERIMETER 126 115 LF OF PERIMETER <6' FROM GRADE TO F.F. ABOVE - 65 68 . % PERIMETER < 6' to FF ABOVE . Sl t> Sn® devprog 1/27/98 '1 • rv- 15TH STREET 1.? PfZ1v6 'bPPg..Vb''', O 44* v,J40‘l4' �5 (7,E,d -44 2 4" crciSo DRIVE So' Co M,Vv6 a 0 0 • oj RI •. �0� %Jail 00 1= ' l10 m& l 1 • u .DM � N 41 11\0 X. cal E 0 bo \D • 4- z z 'GARAGE E1.1n4 ,1$ I 9' k\ 'S UNIT I - BSM 'T_ to , Cj / ,1ST FLOOR 11 5.o VI 2ND FL' 1141 • o'j H SkSiiig, la G 12' SETBACK v./ o. 5 vcck 0' c 1 I l s.s 0 II I.32T.°, O0 Li Lr a Tom. 10' 0 oc2ct 1o& f,C\• 2J /2 W ll� , GUEST SPACE 1) \briocc-bp\1A/ { CAIpA.Sa v1/ S for fatAN- 1` •' r COMMON OPEN SPACE 42 !.221.5 S t - k REVISED PLAN SUBMITTAL. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 5/21/9W . • L9 4 Li Ball 1003 (=. '. GARAGE cry N L s , BSM'T , 1 01 wt -0 .1ST FLOOR. 110• CO '2ND FLOOR, 11:\ • 01 UNIT B 0 ,25,� LANTER V4/ L9 b (9 0 COMMON OPEN SPACE #1'85 S.F. ul 4) PfAr W bU� 22' MIN CLEAR 29' TOTAL COMMON SPACE '306.5 S.F. SITE PLAN BASEMENT PERIMETER CONDITION INITIAL SUBMISSION PLANNING REVIEW -SET 3/25/98 CECEEE7ED MAY 2 1 1998 COM. DEV. DEPT. RGAINC. ARCHITECMPIANNERS ROBERT GARSTEIN,ARCHITECT 2175 W 236 TH STREET TORRANCE,CALIF 90501 310-325- 2611 FAX 310 - 325 -0044 [1 ALL IDEAS , DESIGNS AND PLANS REPRODUCED t -ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERT AND CREATION OF THE ARCHITECT RGA INC,ROBERT CARSTEIN ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF SAID ARCHITECT.AL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS TO BE VERIFIED • Lk E. r f 4 ' W 0 r®1 W I at; ® LU w 0 s REVISION DATE SCALE DRAWN JOB SHEET •1 CP , A get 4,4 r 44.1-u � I a BEDROOM X ( t r_ 4.Lt4UNDRY �II 1� I-31 I L-1 cL 2 C 1 HALL • 'EL -1 13.02' BEDROOM 1 � Z BEDROOM fiIST_FLOOR 1479 S.F. DN 1 • at. TG.1 ELEV.)O I FLOOR ABV. GAME ROOM I !i DECK MASTER BEDROOM .MASTER BATH l 00 EL 104. 2 C TRY { BATH o[ GARAGE FLOOR ABV. I \r TOTAL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE'286 ,TOTAL LIVEABLE S.F. 3054 S.F. J BASEMENT 348.25 S.F. UNIT A • ;CLAY TILE SKYLIGH TYP. SLOPE 41 It. • MAX HT @ CP1 ALLOWABLE 133.63' ROOF PLAN 21'.co II TILE DECK EL'. 130.52' OPEN SPACE 216 S.F. T.O.S. 131.02' 1 11 .s LIVING VOL CLG. DINING SND FLOOR 1227. S.F. S r V z OPEN SPACE 132 S.F. no DECK EL. 122.62' KITCHEN . 7'-6" CLG 0 �— S24-1 OLID • N 0 GREAT ROOM VOL CLG. EICDEWED MAY 2 1 1998 COM. DEV. DEPT. r\_INC. RGAINC. AJCIJITECTSMANNHRS ROBERT GARSTEIN,ARCHITECT 2175 W 236 TH STREET TORRANCE,CAL1F 90501 310-325- 2611 FAX 310 - 325 -0044 ALL IDEAS , DESIGNS AND PLANS REPRODUCE ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERT AND CREATION OF THE ARCHITECT RCA INC,ROBERT GARSTEIN ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF SAID ARCHITECT.AL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS TO BE VERIFIEC r L1. 0 111 CO 2 0 2 ? W W d� Z H (n •f ll) 0 0 a REVISION DATE SCALE L6 HTac" DRAWN JOB CWAl SHEET 4 • 4 { e t 4 r N. 3/4 41'-o DECK MASTER.BEDROOM H MASTER O riN 1ST FLOOR 1291.75 S.F. U HALL BEDROOM DECK ABV. -1 - MASTER BEDROOM BVa BATH 'Loco" J BEDROOM BEDROOM 51- 7 BAT 1 EL 106.1'; ENTRif • Pi EL01.6' I Its 44- 1 GARAGE tail) —17 cb,c 3, rju`i3 - arr STG.(EL -1-r 1 n L40 -A' :BASEMENT''' 533.50 S.F. UNIT B 0-rr l 1 • T.O.S.128.6 _ SLOPE TYP 1 -- u - cc W v T.O.S. 131.1' TILE I DECK 128.6' CLAY TILE AS SELECTED -- 1 ROOF PLAN. MAX HT @ CP2 ALLOWABLE 133.28' 'h 1 r I DECK e l 105.5 S.F. GREAT ROOM. VOL CLG. 7 TOTAL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 249.5 S.F. TOTAL LIVEABLE AREA 2961 S.F. -- =L 119.6' N 111 O U O 4(01.[0• 2ND FLOOR�� 1135.75 S.F. 44, f!CEIVED MAY 2 1 1998 COM. DEV. DEPT. ARGBtTECTSyPLANNERS ROBERT GARSTEIN,ARCHITECT 2175 W 236 TH STREET TORRANCE,CALIF 90501 310-325- 2611 FAX 310 - 325 -0044 ALL IDEAS , DESIGNS AND PLANS REPRODUCED ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERT AND CREATION OF THE ARCHITECT RGA INC,ROBERT GARSTEIN ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED)N WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF SAID ARCHITECT.AL 1 DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS TO BE VERIFIED ' LL U n I U �Mw ■QJJJ•' 20 2 Z W �^ W ZEr. O cn o _. LtJ LZL REVISION DATE , SCALE DRAWN JOB SHEET 4 ., 1 ., . . .rt .4.• M.. ,M - • • , Oen 1-61.-1 t 1 t� A 000000 -r 154 .Sit, SECTION_- A -A_____ 11 0 • • • . I KITCHEN -__BEDROOM__ - _BATH, GARAGE . DINING BEDROOM. 4 • I • I d POWDER Vr1 is 4,1 LAUNDRY 133.6�,r T =� DECK KIITCHEN 1 _GREAT ROOM • BEDRO M . W.I.C. 'MASTER BATH `tr0.e•y • MAX. HT_ LIMIT._ ........ 5 X4' Cc) Fe' • 0 26 • • _GARAGE i ........................................................... ....................... 13► . c� T. c 1 i • t � 1 c C) 0 • • • • SOUTHELEVATION. • • Co co . O • . rr XIST GRADE 1U_ rJ ' —i Or, .C, T, ••-4 a sr. see. 0 NORTH ELEVATION (UNIT B) 0 5 Fa" �4 • 1 g 9 10 P L. 's 11. 0 6' . d 15 TH_STREEt N ROA mc. ARCHITECTS(PI NNER3 ROBERT GARSTEIN,ARCHITECT 2175 W 236 TH STREET TORRANCE,CALIF 90501 310-325- 2611 FAX 310.325 -0044 r ALL IDEAS , DESIGNS AND PLANS REPRODUCED ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERT AND CREATION OF THE ARCH rECT RGA INC,ROBERT CARSTEIN ARCHITECT 1. AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PRIOR WRITTEN CQNSENT OF SAID ARCHITECT. AL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS TO BE VERIFIED i 106, ,(cri ) EG EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE (RESIDENTIAL) 7/8 STUCCO ON APPROVED PAPER BACKED LATH,INTEGRALCOLOR ASSELECIEUTEXTURE ASSHOWN ON DRAWINGS RED CLAY TILE 50% FLASHED ROOF'S.TILES ICBG i2656P AS MFR BY CALIFORNIA TILE INC , 511 RIVERSIDE AVE.,RIALTO,CA DUAL GLAZED VINYL WINDOWS PER SCHEDULE RESAWN EXPOSED CEDAR TREWS OR CORBELS PAINTED WOOD GARAGE DOOR STYLEPER ELEVATION METAL ROOF DORMERS PAINTED TO MATCH ROOF 26 GA G.I. FLASHING PAINTED WOOD ENTRY DOOR PER SCHEDULE METAL CHIMNEY CAP WITH SPARK ARRESTOR PAINTED SHEET METAL SCUPPER PAINTED • 8• X 8' X4' PCG GLASS BLOCK - STYLE AS SELECTED OR INDICATED CERAMIC TILE COLOR AND TYPE AS SELECTED W. !_cen!NG PAINTED - 1 X6 LET - IN BRACE @ ALL CORNERS 8 EVERY 25 UN. FT. OF WALL (TYP.) GJ•" FOAM MOULDINGS WI STUCCO FINISH.COAT STYLE AS INDICATED Cr PREFINISHED ALUM GUTTER W/ DOWNSPOUTS • 1 1' nrCaIVED MAY 2 1 1998 COM. DEV. DEPT. REVISION DATE SCALE DRAWN JOB SHEET r • . •• Rol II Is I (f�rat a sr. see. 0 NORTH ELEVATION (UNIT B) 0 5 Fa" �4 • 1 g 9 10 P L. 's 11. 0 6' . d 15 TH_STREEt N ROA mc. ARCHITECTS(PI NNER3 ROBERT GARSTEIN,ARCHITECT 2175 W 236 TH STREET TORRANCE,CALIF 90501 310-325- 2611 FAX 310.325 -0044 r ALL IDEAS , DESIGNS AND PLANS REPRODUCED ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERT AND CREATION OF THE ARCH rECT RGA INC,ROBERT CARSTEIN ARCHITECT 1. AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PRIOR WRITTEN CQNSENT OF SAID ARCHITECT. AL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS TO BE VERIFIED i 106, ,(cri ) EG EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE (RESIDENTIAL) 7/8 STUCCO ON APPROVED PAPER BACKED LATH,INTEGRALCOLOR ASSELECIEUTEXTURE ASSHOWN ON DRAWINGS RED CLAY TILE 50% FLASHED ROOF'S.TILES ICBG i2656P AS MFR BY CALIFORNIA TILE INC , 511 RIVERSIDE AVE.,RIALTO,CA DUAL GLAZED VINYL WINDOWS PER SCHEDULE RESAWN EXPOSED CEDAR TREWS OR CORBELS PAINTED WOOD GARAGE DOOR STYLEPER ELEVATION METAL ROOF DORMERS PAINTED TO MATCH ROOF 26 GA G.I. FLASHING PAINTED WOOD ENTRY DOOR PER SCHEDULE METAL CHIMNEY CAP WITH SPARK ARRESTOR PAINTED SHEET METAL SCUPPER PAINTED • 8• X 8' X4' PCG GLASS BLOCK - STYLE AS SELECTED OR INDICATED CERAMIC TILE COLOR AND TYPE AS SELECTED W. !_cen!NG PAINTED - 1 X6 LET - IN BRACE @ ALL CORNERS 8 EVERY 25 UN. FT. OF WALL (TYP.) GJ•" FOAM MOULDINGS WI STUCCO FINISH.COAT STYLE AS INDICATED Cr PREFINISHED ALUM GUTTER W/ DOWNSPOUTS • 1 1' nrCaIVED MAY 2 1 1998 COM. DEV. DEPT. REVISION DATE SCALE DRAWN JOB SHEET r • . •• • • Z 3 4- t; 5 V 8 1 P I I 11 11 7/Er STUCCO ON APPROVED PAPER BACKED LATHINTEGRALCOLORASSELECTEDTEXTUREAS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS - RED CLAY TILE 50% FLASHED ROOF 5• TILES ICBO 32656P AS MFR BY CAUFORNtA TILE INC , 511 RIVERSIDE AVE,RIALTO,CA DUAL GLAZED VINYL W NDOWS PER SCHEDULE RESAWN EXPOSED CEDAR TRELLIS OR CORBELS PAINTED WOOD GARAGE DOOR STYLEPER ELEVATION METAL ROOF DORMERS PAINTED TO MATCH ROOF 26 GA G.I. FLASHING PAINTED WOOD ENTRY DOOR PER SCHEDULE METAL CHIMNEY CAP WITH SPARK ARRESTOR PAINTED SHEET METAL SCUPPER PAINTED 8' X 8' X4' PCG GLASS BLOCK - STYLE AS SELECTED OR INDICATED CERAMIC TILE COLOR AND TYPE AS SELECTED WLoeItINGPAINTED • S I % 1 X 6 LET - IN BRACE © ALL CORNERS & EVERY 25 UN. FT. OF WALL (TYP.) I 9 FOAM MOULDINGS WI STUCCO FINISH,COAT STYLE AS INDICATED • 4 PREFINISHEDACUMGUTTER W/DOWNSPOUTS . r Wtkat C eta. • 4 • cloy . e G • • • •S. tem , lob -14, Tv0 . N, .S +"T 4 3. N%01.1Ca 1oI,SL.0 Fsti • • • lbw •...., If L3t44 O tt. • 13'2,.tfi l/ 14ti.a,1'. In N 0 II' Pti• SOTUTH__ELEVAT_ION (UNIT A) 1/4^-\'-0 .s • II 4 119, c9 166 NIa4.,tih 0 0 • 113, p4» 0 1I!�'�,•��•�1�__ —Tei 4•• _ pa /, •`"""rii moi._`-, } 3 0 ti lI tv. d mEd I►l ass tjV 1b5.1t. -r NORTH_ ELEVAT_ION._:. 1/41-11-0 MAX_HEIGHT LIMIT`- _. re. 10. c0 10(i:1 F. O EAST. ELEVATION "gm•rrrq,p•rn— I a 0 iI I aaa•Taelgi faibass moral I4• u / ►�5.v romateS eat slassurimi C)ot.'(1 J S 2 EXIST GRADE C+oo, 31-) • I, I. SeWilrea 1141,4M•11/14 WSW. Imod ht. lo`Y C' Fw ?11 �"�EXIS'T:—GRADE (0%5 .d' T \\0.O T.0,0 - ••w 13`b• L t7 Mac HT �►P�• • Q 2 I F.ECCaVED. MAY 2 1 1998 COM. DEV. DEPT. • po ■P[iFTis•'.;•JAR IF elppornti itit)DINC; op FOia CONST1.:I; ^�c RCAINC. , ARCHITECTS(PIAIWERS ROBERT GARSTEIN,ARCHITECT 2175 W 236TH STREET TORRANCE,CALIF 90501 310-325- 2611 FAX 310 - 325-0044 ALL IDEAS , DESIGNS AND PLANS REPRODUCE[ ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERT AND CREATION OF THE ARCHIT EC f RGA INC,ROBERT GARSTEIN ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF SAID ARCHITECT AL ,- DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS TO BE VERIFIED REVISION DATE SCALE DRAWN JOB SHEET .4- L. • • ,i + • •t 14 t • c'P.t..µ lo3• Ll ILA Ifliallain111•101•16•Mia.4,11.11MAILS (144t,.1 f1Cot1,.-. 1'WoN 19-r fVo6e rtil/ \\,s o ti • • Ill E1. 101. U u • l 1 C10o,ah) 2 iia aaaaiaaaia a an a MIL aaAll Coo lc") L • a. WgSrELEVATI0NJ . 1141 1 `' SI Loa. of . 17124‘47-- I 2' -i-- r • r • o`/ 4- 4--I 4 • -_ rise L troy 11`1, O -14)1.0 MAY, H VC4 E1.J\L C100,60 ,t I' a ♦ r .6 b`, N se V • S. .---Imain no R------ a=R>si r E3ECEIVED MAY 2 1 1998 COM. DEV. DEPT. • • +ti,ar11E ' - P 7N'TPt, RCA �. ARCHITECTS{PTANNE11S I ' rOBERT GARSTEIN,ARCHITECT 2175 W 236 TH STREET I ORRANCE,CALIF 90501 310-325- 2611 FAX 310 - 325 -0044 • REVISION DATE SCALE DRAWN JOB SHEET ILL J V W CO 0 2 cc TW T• I W W cc LI i I—� co 44 i -lope? rbed 511 I t 1` • • 1 t, 1 :Id 1 • „, , '• NOTES • General Contractor 1 Developer will provide requireddine voltage to controller locations. Irrigation Contractor shall make final hook-up, Install No. 14 UF direct burial irligation wire (black pilot, white common). Use epoxy connectors and bury wire with main line, bundled and taped together every ten feet. From expansion coils @ each remote control valve and change of direction. Install Schedule 40 PVC sleeves under all paving. 2. All piping between the point of connection and backflow preventer artH/or vacuum breakers shall be of materials and installation methods required by the Local Codes. 3. All piping under paved areas shall be installed prior to paving, by the Irrigation Contractor. Use PVC Schedule 40 pipe for all non -pressure lateral line piping installed under paved areas. Install all sleeving for pressure lines and control wiring, plus all non -pressure lateral line piping under paving prior to paving. 4. Final location of automatic controller(s) and back- flow preventers(s) shall be eproved by the Owner's authorized Reprezentatives. 5. Irrigation Contractor' shall flush all lines and adjust all heads for maz. performance and to prevent overspray onto walks, drives, and buildings as much, as possible. This shall include selecting the best degree of arc to fit existing site condi- tions and throttling the flow control at each valve to obtain the best operating pressure for each system. • 6. It is the responsibility of the irrigation cont- ractor to familiarize himself with all grade differences, locations of walls, retaining walls,. etc. He shall coordinate his work with the General Contractor and other sub -contractors for the location and the installation of pipe sleeves through walls, under udways,pavinge structures, etc. 8. Contractor must stop all backdrainage of sprinkler heads w/a "VALCON ADV" check valve installed.in the riser. Install only as needed after flushing to prevent backdrainage. Adjust to Minimum preassure loss. 9. Adjustall bubblers to prevent excessive flooding. 10. The Irrigation Contractor shall verify meter size on the site prior to construction, and provide an irrigation system compatible with existing meter. 11. All plant material shall be of specimen quality. 12. Refer to Site Plan for hardscape elements not shown on this plan. 13. Double stake all specimen teees over 5 gal. 14. Provide 24"‘box trees to replace,exist'g trees removed. 15. Contractor provide approved automatic irrigation system for all :landscaped areas. 16. Provide headerboard for ail annual color area per Det. (Typ.) A \ Root guards for all trees within .31-0" of walls and walks shall be provided. Keep turf away from building. Landscape Contractor shall provide all pop-up head type irrigations heads system. No alternates will be accepted unless approved by. Architect. t-. 1 1. PLANTING OF LAWN: it Hydroseeding: a. Hydroseeding shall include application of mulch, Itytiliztr end seed. planting tied preparation, pre end post -planting irrigation.- 0. Seed shell be fresh, clear, new certified crop wed, composed of the following varieties mixed 111 tht proportions indicated it all the 49141 shown on plan es "Mowed turf'. c. Alter soil preparation, esti 61 ishment of tint grades and weed control, the surface 2" of soil shell be loosened by hem* or rototilier end floated level and irrigated Jun prior to planting. 2. ?reparation, a. The slurry preparat .on shall take place at the site of work and shell begin by adding miter to the tank when the engine is at nalf-tnrottle when the ester level has reached Inc height of the agitator Shaft. good recircul-ation Snell be established and, at this time. the seed and Chemical additive shall be added Fertiliter shall then be added fol. lowed oy wood p. -Ip Mulch The wood pulp mulch shall only he added to the mixture after Inc tank is at lent one-third filled with water. The engine throttle Shall De opened to full speed when the tank is half.filled with miter Ail the wood Pulp mulch shall be added by the time the tank is two- tnirds to three-fourths full Spraying shall Commence five minutes after aooltIon of pie cherical additive wnen the' tank is full b. By Quantity Ratio; Oil baron kentucki oluegrasS 20t Jamestown .:hewings fescue 202 Palmer Perennial iiyegrass c. App I 'Cation kat* for Turt: FIDer 1.500 IDS. per acre Seto 170 IDS. per Fertilizer Mix acre 300 10S. per acre Chemical An ciotwes 3 - los. per acre 3. Application: a. The operatorishall spray the area With a uniform visible coat by fling Inc green Color of Inc sood pulp as a guide. The Slurry Shill be applied in a sweeping Region in an arched stream so as to fell like ram, allowing the wood fibers material to spread et the reouired rate per acre. 3.04 CLEAN-IJi A. After ell planting operations have been completed. remove all trash, excess soil, *misty Plant containers and rubbish from Inc property. Alt scars. ruts or other marks in the ground caused by this work shall be repaired and the ground left in a meat and orderly condition throughout the Site Clean-up contractor shall pick up all trash resulting from this work tib less frequently than each Friday before leaving Inc site. once 4 week, and/or Inc last working day each week. All trash shall be removed completely .fromtne site. 4. The Contractor shell leave the site area broom -clean and shall wasp down all paved areas within the Contract area, leaving the premises in a clean condition. 4. Time limit: • a. All slurry mixture which has not Wen applied within two -hours after mixing will be ,rejected and removed from the project at the Contractors expense., 5. Irrigation: a. Immediately after completion of hyOroseeding, each area shall 6e irrigated. irrigation during the germination period of the seed shall keep the hydrOMulCA moist at all times without creating run-off, erospn or over -Saturation. The irrigation System is to be in operating Condition and have been tested before planting is started. 6. Reseeding: r a. All bare SpotS Shell be reseeded by the Contractor within tendays. The Contractor will be responsible for all 'reseeded areas for as idlig after seeding as necessary until an acceptable Stand Of grass is realized and approved. - b. All turf -located tree basins shall be removed and seeded or sodded by hand JO days prior to end of maintenance period or 'e sooner. at the Contractor's discretion. Providing adequate, deep -watering 'of tree IS Continued throughout the eStabliShMent period. NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OWNER WITH ALTERNATE BID FOR SOD BLUE -GRASS IN LIEU OF HYDRO -SEED. PLANT SCHEDULE: SIGN: 1 BOIANNICAL -• COMMON NAME: QUANTITY: 1. HYDRO -SEED, BERMEA REFER It SPECS KR la. . 2. PARnIFNXIS&JS nucusnregrA-Boorc• 13,rt 3 . GAZANIA 12" 0.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING 4. BEDERA HELIX "HAWAII" WMFLATS CUTTINGS 1 12" O.C., TRIANGULAR SPACING 5. - 5 GAL FICUS PuMILA - FIG VINE 6. 5 -GAL AZALEA RIEDCOREICRCN - "REDWING" 7 . 5 -CAI. NERIUM OLEANDER - OLEANDER 5r-0" O.C. 8. YUCCA ALOIFOLIA - SPANISH BAYONET - 5 -GAL 3'-0" O.C. 9h . CYCAS mourrA - SAGO PAM .--5(0.,11Scy/, 7'n" 0.c. 10. 24" BDX MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA - 9011THERNMAGNOLIA 11. 15 -GAL EUCALIPTUS CINEREA - SILVER DaLLAR TREE 12. 15- GAL PARKDOICUkPCULFATA- JEWIJIATHDRN 13. ANNUAL COLORS \ 4 • loc; f5o>6 F\ eA, ei Ths re .11-v-4, %Hi', NOTE: PROVIDE APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND PARKWAY LANDSCAPING AND STREET TREES AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. s., 1 • • , r • RDSCAPIEMG.':-.,PL " .." • :"; . " . • , .. • . .. ▪ ; . ' ; 1' , _ . ' .• . ' . . '122' . ' 4 • ,t. ' f ' l) • • - • ' • .4, 4 I t , , ' • A • --• u 1, . - ' Ai a Atm _ e w• • W.1112 re/ _IPW•TietifTS. - fra sf4 94F 400 r is --2 •?Lie -r -res 2k•igis liDe;.E1 FSe Wht45-5, t+CeatIMP.a.TVA CS MIN.) • • Mrt g401W-Eg5 rertmear; . _ adicr7fai eriece - test-espett.8.2 „crow. _ TYR STAKING DETAIL J*.. 1 TYP. HEADERBOARD DETAIL • 9 my 1 1ml 740tEIVED MAN 2 1 1998 COM. DEV. DEPT. I, a 2 8 8 2.4 cn 0 cn CA Ism CO ONO revisions m- "0 0 t_tic ie h - c, .cso 13 " = m ... 0 w a) C I t f(l)f o 15 c) a -occrcE w 0 ct ecilz070 O i_lij w m 8. 0 )-- is W 2 22 I 13 m m < dE c -CD .tt 0 m : m a •0c O o a t m 0 0 E 2 WC O .- 2 - Z7; 0 -0 73 0 0 o m t x c a C0) m-) 00) tu _2 0 7€ a X rti M 1± fi 0 be verified in field by 0 c 0 c 0 0 -o c 0 cc0. E the contractor. 01 1 SCALE: I" = 1 0' PARCEL SUBDIVIDER DON KARASEVICZ 840 I5TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 25, HEFFNER, FIORINI TRACT M.B. 9-106 JOP ADDRESS 840 I5TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA . t; Ltr y.00' o��f�p L1 Li tJ6, Lor 2Cs wc. VESTING TENTATIVE SHEET I OF I SHEET VAP \0, 21493 r� 7Co Li. 00'1 L} Z. oo ' (fit lk) L �O 0/ E ( e4i'i "X' ON _.?Icor coFz.JJeF oni Tor op fb L.ocJ{ 0 ckI ENGINEER DENN 3914 DEL TORRANCE, (310) 542 ENGINEERS AMO BLVD., STE. 921 CA 90503 -99 EDWARD G. SHWEIRI NOTES fr4���pDG.Sy 4 Ate. iv' w NO. 11264 EXP. 124141 C'YfL e_c_-z . DATE 03-24-98 R.C.E. 11284 I. ALL 'EXIST 1 NG_ STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL UTILITIES ARE LOCATED IN ADJACENT STREETS .3. THIS IS A 2 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT. lin IN I R 2 a D2J.DEPT. L L i E Lori `.ikh ea. BL c I e t. m OhA .{LJJoQ�- .L.L. -rR.Ac. , ..M,t. 7-1*. LOMITA BLUEPRINT REORDER NO. 881.250