Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/09/99-,�t-99- s 9 1/ 0 _i "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." - Winston Churchill AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, March 9, 1999 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK Robert Benz Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER Julie Oakes John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER John Bowler Stephen R. Burrell Sam Y. Edgerton CITY ATTORNEY J. R. Reviczky Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MAYOR'S COMMENTS / ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. 1 • • (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Members of the public wishing to request the removal of an item from the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; 3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 4) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) COUNCIL COMMENTS (c) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce dated March 2, 1999 requesting that the City Council formally oppose the proposed ordinance to regulate beach use and temporary events known as the "Coastal Conservation Act". RECOMMENDATION: Consider. request and direct staff as deemed appropriate. 2. Letter from Wally Azbill dated March 2, 1999 regarding violations of construction rules at sites on Amby Place. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3, with public comment permitted at that time. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on February 23, 1999. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. 2 • • (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to set workshop dates of Monday, May 24th and Monday, June 7th at 7:10pm for review of the 1999-00 budget. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 24, 1999. (e) Recommendation to adopt r se olut on to authorize the release of funds available under the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant (JAIBG) to the County of Los Angeles. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated February 22, 1999. (f) Recommendation to amend existing janitorial service agreement to include mid-day service and seven-day service at the Community Center and fail areas. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated March 1, 1999. (g) Recommendation to award bid for installation of a utility bed on a Ford F250 Pick-up Truck to Pacific Truck Equipment, Inc. for $8,868.00. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated March 2, 1999. (h) Recommendation to.adopt a resolut on, ordering the preparation of a report for the annual levy of assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during fiscal year 1999-00. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated March 2, 1999. (i) V) Recommendation to approve -lease agreement between the City and the South Bay Free Clinic for the use of Rooms 7 & 11 in the Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 3, 1999. Recommendation to approve the call for bids for CIP 97-182 & CIP 97-1831 Myrtle Avenue and Loma Drive Utility Undergrounding Assessment District. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated March 2, 1999. Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of February 2, 1999. Recommendation to.adout resolution approving Final Map #24968 for a two - unit condominium proiect at 125 - 4th Street. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated March 2, 1999. 3 • • 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. PERMANENT RETENTION OF OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS ON SIXTH STREET, WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated February 16, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Retain the existing raised barricade channelizing 6th Street, west of Pacific Coast Highway and retain 6th Street as a short section of a one way street between 125 and 145 feet west of Pacific Coast Highway. 5. PERMANENT RETENTION OF OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS ON THIRD STREET, EAST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND OCEAN VIEW AVENUE, BETWEEN 3RD AND 4TH STREETS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated February 17, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Retain the existing raised barricade channelizing 3`d Street, east of Pacific Coast Highway; retain 3`d Street as a two way street between Pacific Coast Highway and 120 feet east of PCH; and, retain the closure of Ocean View Avenue between 3`i and 4th Street. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVE - COASTAL CONSERVATION ACT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 24, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file report. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. PROPERTY TAX RETURN - AB304 (WILDMAN). Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 3, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize a letter of support for AB304 and direct staff to track the bill as it moves through the legislative process. 4 • • b. VEHICLE REGISTRATION SURCHARGE - SB98 (ALARCON) Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated March 3, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize a letter of support for SB98 and direct staff to track the bill as it moves through the legislative process. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request from Mayor Pro Tem Oakes for consideration of adding parking restrictions on Valley Drive from Gould Avenue to 25th Street. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION AS FOLLOWS: 1. MINUTES: a. Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on January 26, 1999; b. Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on February 9, 1999 at 6:30pm; and, c. Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on February 9, 1999 held immediately following the Regular City Council meeting. 5 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: Gigliotti v. City of Hermosa Beach Case Number: YCO29195 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT 6 o I Bob, March 9, 1999 Please adjourn tonight's meeting in memory of former employee Laurie Duke who passed away February 14 after a long battle against lung cancer. Laurie was a dedicated and valued employee of the City for 21 years, beginning in 1972 when she hired in as a secretary in the Building Department, until her retirement in 1993 as assistant to the City Manager. With her sense of humor and warm, generous nature, she made many friends over the years, throughout the City offices and the community. Laurie had a special fondness for Hermosa Beach that dated back to her childhood. She was a Hermosa resident from the age of 12 until she moved to Hawaii after graduating from Redondo Union High School. She often shared stories about the fun she had growing up near the beach. On behalf of the entire City Council, I wish to extend our deepest condolences to her family. Thanks! Elaine • • March 9, 1999 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Subject: "Permanent retention of operational improvement on Sixth Street west of P.C.H." Translated the illegal and unconstitutional blocking of a city street Ladies and Gentlemen: I am unalterably opposed to blocking the subject street for the selfish use of a few residents. This will discourage me from using Klein Rite and other nearby merchants I regularly use and result in my taking my business to Manhattan Beach or other more convenient locations. It is also the regular and more convenient route to my residence in Hermosa Beach. If it becomes necessary for these merchants or other residents to challenge blockage of this dedicated public street, which has been used daily for years, please call on me for financial support to take any and all legal action to remedy this selfish, short sighted and unlawful action. The longtime dedication and use of this as a public street precludes any action to privatize this right of way. It is my wish further to give the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees personally as well of their liability for any closure or related restrictive actions. Furthermore I intend if granted to petition the State of California and the U.S. Government to investigate this and any other public streets so restricted in Hermosa Beach and remove them from any and all subsidies to the City of Hermosa Beach. Susan J. Glasheen 447 Herondo Street #301 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 310-376-3315 • • City of Hermosa rl3eaelt.. February 16, 1999 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE PERMANENT RETENTION OF THE RAISED BARRICADE ON SIXTH STREET, WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 9, 1999, at 7:30 PM or shortly thereafter, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, to consider the following: 1. Permanent retention of operational improvement on Sixth Street, west of Pacific Coast Highway ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate and speak at this hearing at the above place. All written testimony by any interested party will be accepted prior to or at the scheduled time on the agenda for the matter. The City's contact person is: Harold C. Williams, Director of Public Works, 318-0211. 1.);61 ¥Iarold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer F'B95'P' 4 FI LES/NOTIC E4. DOC • March 9, 1999 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Subject: "Permanent retention of operational improvement on Sixth Street west of P.C.H." Translated the illegal and unconstitutional blocking of a city street. Ladies and Gentlemen: I am unalterably opposed to blocking the subject street for the selfish use of a few residents. This will discourage me from using Klein Rite and other nearby merchants I regularly use and result in my taking my business to Manhattan Beach or other more convenient locations. It is also the regular and more convenient route to my residence in Hermosa Beach. If it becomes necessary for these merchants or other residents to challenge blockage of this dedicated public street, which has been used daily for years, please call on me for financial support to take any and all legal action to remedy this selfish, short sighted and unlawful action. The longtime dedication and use of this as a public street precludes any action to privatize this right of way. It is my wish further to give the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees personally as well of their liability for any closure or related restrictive actions. Furthermore I intend if granted to petition the State of California and the U.S. Government to investigate this and any other public streets so restricted in Hermosa Beach and remove them from any and all subsidies to the City of Hermosa Beach. Susan J. Glasheen 447 Herondo Street #301 Hermosa Beach, CA CtA254 310-376-3315 • City of 2iermosa TeacIL2 4, w,► February 16, 1999 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE PERMANENT RETENTION OF THE RAISED BARRICADE ON SIXTH STREET, WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach shall hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 9, 1999, at 7:30 PM or shortly thereafter, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, to consider the following: 1. Permanent retention of operational improvement on Sixth Street, west of Pacific Coast Highway ANY AND ALL PERSONS interested are invited to participate and speak at this hearing at the above place. All written testimony by any interested party will be accepted prior to or at the scheduled time on the agenda for the matter. The City's contact person is: Harold C. Williams, Director of Public Works, 318-0211. id,;") )rlarold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer F'B95'PWFILES.NOTICE4.DOC Dear Customers: • ).s,e,k_eli& 3/9)99 As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: J r 6Nw� C, tt 0.14.4.,.-r---Ottvd&L- au r ICc 1-61LA-' LA4,30ILO �,- Amprmir,„ Address: /631( i ,fyV/E, 1�R ptIC \9'zr f C C t,r Mb 04-714_6/ s'I i(.. -ss . E3 H.13. ,L/ ?s7 a l 917, ("b"/* tetyv6 e Co 2..1 r 14-1- cC w ti CrJ �Z7 ht/' SiY� 1f t S kAt:\c'r `�'-4 e , _ j I G tg„t-tt [a-nd Ave- Ar4A 4'4°4 l L`pj Vo osteo u& STA 7,4-1r7/ /:// /le o oekte.44 ZZs 3 s— vv\b, ct oz c, (- L. c/t-t A-- /mss 90 ),) ? s r 2 Al. 5/- e c-4- o Zsy ‘? CcaA.mt-I Mcd gtetvAr' 4;seli 677- mites/' 024(2 19 97( oci c -1-0I10,_ ,443edaer4d/-17' j,.a P -i ri LADt 1---am.PozZ- 2..13. 9 0z7-8 1k.A-3r3& )g q - Co -n T 44,1-(1h /20 171E VL -4 *203, /18; CA 4o 2 Dear Customers: • • As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our p; ition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence an • 0 ,finesses of Hermosa Beach. Address: 434o/ .4ee iie.8 4:1.2-7 7, x►7,si J' 11 Mc,Fay3�s'� s,,y � rWCv_sallo /if( S. fr,W7174/ N{34 Arc <�9 4t/>' -s733 s7 S. /O g�fs7 1:✓ -U -w -a- 1 l id4Rb \4iCk1 i.v P. 12 32 C,olzoNA :t 14, C3, 9c?2.4 liekii t i.= i N Lh at, 46,4_11_ - 5-& -i' eaciA,,Aki tit) )Q V7 9 fir. A goys -y P(35- M M'rc�cc� pre‘ geci.o1--ger 52f /23/c79cccs Civ, 2IO( 4Qnhaf%Qn cls 8igdi. R6 06 g 4 its1>43 1A3 ,ya 3 Ng -1't)Z,Ty( % cA ?o 77 14-v3 cc, coas-9- 4;7 /75421)40,v1- goa.-2.6 Dear Customers: • As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: Signature: nAJDV ( ,4 ,Z06 & Mo,/ Gvrran L#fes 51 2L Cid & 2,4 7 q7T Address: r 1 /04117W ,06 Iisia!M 1 CY11(o RTD lfck .9 F M feiha P1, u.2ZVi4 -4 10o Ih'1 i; 6-61 Z4444, rLAfe; 14.T3, (colt .. cs44�.L - k, ( ,t ) 2��X e /yo w s pre cIl es Lid -g-s- 962:2? / %4r//7 el ,),3 :.,1 d ' 2.-'f1 902-2-2 F 4,/Ctcc4 R. �, X02-77 H 1.O% Loc14 4_ fh.(. coerce /i 5 s ,91ox 13/1 //g h 9oz5/ Dear Customers: • i As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Si' ature: Address: \1« 4214 ry E S 2' 5:7-ninAel .m� ©� S i —� 1+6 > a Pog frallaMV Ix& v4,kkaAlli (\to...);cuiL, or\ . �.,L r L W9 /1�►J��/(/9 h „#.'f. 8mlr;/6�r C 1/14_ 06_1 44 , t gilt VII- tvo j-1 1'hrr f i &'mcJ) ULM U5 .9� 411, yr- r le 94 77 ,,2/C3 ?4 akt F/ . 9i a 77 :0,291 ��- �a� PX 1)ou S. (c,.44'46. Aw ee.-10--dg-7,57 f'2 9 * -9_ 2) 7 th&cuk&A 7)ik C&yr-sc fie) 1' Moll' Ee 4 IL aid immit P Aso Sr Lai II / 4 S - EIA s; a yQ-1& S4- f/t b 10" net -nidi 13 -SZ#Fewde-A-Fie,..t. 121/'1/ eel f93/&/3,.1pz- 3i Dear Customers: • S As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: Signature: Address: 1411,2X, 2-‘747 sr5)2 122/ T 33 Pa CcJ Vt r-r/ej f S g Of a 4464_ frcr 62,62,A 6.5. S.1 IMS 76QQ�9�,�•� k3S�)•�tN Alcor ,L• APr 5 ifA vIlnk ok't NA- ge-cM-r4 6> 3it .943of po-pi4--z. (-1(G /79t &M J/L *714 eco rae SE . : 233 S. T.1•c./,9 fry 4'/7 C/kms keit/ t vt»k t ,a C 55 5 � /4.r .24 ` do I 4(a aill a4- T�v .��r$,cr9 a3 ra.tw.A_z_ ?ac54.6 612-2- J k."4 0, g Dear Customers: , • As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: iii NV< kka.au`#y eamr- JAM VI 11/ At4 Iat Signature: orri r _ LOA! Address: 32o I 'te Vr (cQ. /1 PAY 9377 //M6 GPO , - B: */90,, 96274 62(e7er 11 ocean titer/J/1-0o ge` `t aV6f �JFO7 2 t 0 4 +20 Si- 2 1?8 (02,1 dV / /J - #4 arots--/ GA*A-- t•d•,3 AMINDIA,V S �- ?a$ 41O ,i U z a -A -v 41- P..11 Toz,77 2oy/bd71/02 -`-f alzY pis € 9e -2 -sr / 3, 3-03�c 6)0251 nS' °ice (GuL.S o. 116 90 .i'"r4 /03 3 - ✓lci-a-ct,:ca._, 4 -ti .# 1 Z 902-77 SAVIV So. De, 4 tants, 4 Saz�y 9_i>72 itAhviWin Moy1 z /PPcA AI 6 C'4 Z7 'In 3 P.(3 •ILK. C e 902 7? ci Dear Customers: • • As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name:__((Signature: c - \Werrok 4di i 4U 41.1A• rt i Pict- ) 6N5 Jae Yeto y� a4/ ass Address: /r ioth N6 -902 ,5-y N.%__/i'/`C- -uoa 9oZ77 � -IN( a,Ut���. 0v1 Q q02:77 . -or�&i f 9V-7) G>Y� /1,3.. r 23 22- Abk- 6 -41W/ Ak /Mk_ wo-• wtmrstromz Atipmw V 4/-/ (250 owoos A- IE tF laCO za 2r 616' oasr, Soo R 6 x01.7 7 p [So 3/i 6 c4 (c _etc” Le a ! /„ .� �, •, / s!Alai' 02 J'i: /L /�i 11�L4 fi , LAO/ ..1 - / ZiZ '.tee eve 4' 50z4 G r,_ -,m..• , . °‘,(1 _ 0Z-5 Sob L -f, i*/ 1 3o 0= 5k Ma-, 6cCo,U6 / f / to P Civ -- td VUl r° ew-- ) ca' S3 ,WS( A -ow. 1111 26.6 Z'/z.2 /l•�9c o c(g #3° 7 Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: 31=1;1024 1-2)ovro-Nn`8c , efie ii Signa re, A Address: .:..t 0 1.0/1 IMOt rte. .LAAliAlridgilW4 °' 7 l2� ff ,rf4 Lo v tciy /j� moi✓ /'it,aige.,020 4 6 ,(AJ 402 s c -.4.7. 4,/.,,e6 32-5, Pal,l5. cio2k4 OYVev Ab‘tevA, il�e e�, � y C./�P 'S 0 •t 6 K • Ri4c tt. ,A/m_ Vin e.Q 11 -1 - mot --€4 1.mo IPA( t+e _t uu` CEOV11111opitawit Co ".24 Pei i I *IL frt ms -t, l<. r�, � % VV C, j C 4 96 Z )1) lAN_. xi Vele_ 424 i9 3, ,1 9(S gree Iel6 bs t# 4- 2'lextioaocaceid G V. 6 N, gyp, A \kg- 29-d =-..&0 - 64, 8,`) "96' JP ?4-'1f41, ; 114 200 Ifr /013 ALNALtoLiRG4• `Yak, 16crtr i (W `` C go L\� Qt %vol , Dear Customers: • As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: lit>eAt\iLinviavorv6k/ 441Che% /o ea MGS ,-& skd'J i) r, CUA W 1l c j o k✓ j P v i A 7-v a CJ S L Signature: Address: got 54Vned'hhsti gd fii,o P-6 /yin s c 9lex IV /Dig S 1 i/, R. 9o2 '/ (o39 SS G ttg 16251 N/7 14-ea-ovAoi#loy I� 3�s Ll r` S -f t-f5'02�9 Ac\ c -p,614) s LEA: Q ec . GZ,ato6271-jt, - q ( Q 976 & QST 7eet-((• 1)6 " . eAJ, 9a=277. , R9 oinks ' - 'qay kis JVI��v .hn,� 4». Q 02gy x� 41//0 &te.m 8k0 (ow,oa Or 0-(1 Ris goeRi1 41/A4L-efrt,„.a/ trytioAcik' C(1.4-• 34G4 R6. G4 °oz -71 (LACCo So t_ l en A 4r1& 0-6 6c-490177 1.2 n-5 V\A tN7 t4- M - F 4-- c Y4 �4 S _ 61�. �°�" Dear Customers: • As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: A7E_ N 4 Si ture: / Address: G^' 'art ,.,. _ u _ r t 1W,WI,Ii�ar!l, 01 —c.�/. 4 • ► A i r 41s / Avm3g-i d MetAk- apvir.42W � 4iL :e►r►liffre NEW 4so-4040110 rp 1» rws7-_ 8'2LKD(.5-L9 S ufi f/f -101 '(z AA) rn4 5r- o .. ,,zz�r 331 l ea./ 4,14.‘, � �ff��Q _ I/NC, �7thI. �ihao de5cGt OO d 577-a1 ,j ree4, iSd 2)69- OgAi l3 4n 7/2 7� a/ti/ i L .�.f a9 077- 1 t 6=, P70/ VaileOr kan _1 A ) 'Icost, he. tat 41 C1op\r.// f P. ��a�►— kz�;cc � /_ A Dear Customers: • • As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: Caa S�-tvR- d p-e� 7764._ asz G L -(,IT o' -se -y-1. 1-Ie4 Nan l Signature: Address: Lini4 a",u/A4, RT --h PI - 4s71 - lap. fie' l.ew1/41( f --504-/o PY7,96 ' f tee# S7 is s-9 /9.Y6,1,4'"-bcw 1o7 6:t /07 1/3 LO"4 Dr /33 0/ 61- Si-. ///5--- 2-q/‘ HA ,# rr 1J /.4g g130 aq.0.171 ✓4 r� flerondO 3 j�-2Uo-tS pvcy��- o2 s -m sr t3a(57- 1�r 046- a-ra gf 7a 77 123 S'• teNt. �, E acallr. iiJii/ 6A/ 1• itaMikr �1 Gu l r n7s .' sem+ • __ jAr 40° INS -/- , - M dr' V - wow 04 Ili zikif z/ cer a,(fd ZZs-- Aii 6 61-vo f .6 7G1 -J _L ele 190,8 15- /28 713 t o w j4R' cum., b= Dear Customers: • • As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. N me:/ Sign . ure: . , WOa Trofier tH2-Ic4i "/Y4 -a -A-' r1-/ 14,--ri,e_S- A jaki ren i =PJ 1 -.),ii bI 117.-..-47,410M-,"-: - Address: i7a.vAt S27, M. S.0 lintI<'3 91/2 44O U,Itat#317 g.6 4�IS,/ t aek ..''tom, s H 13 i g -21 RA- *1 11?, -7 Lo yr c, ), . #-g 0263% 4-ze-- 1141 Itt-th> LSO; fi?pre_errA 7)-3 ‘``134,c4_ Dear Customers: • • As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 -months period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: z;;i� / ii ,I(l. l • e$001/00 (art' C&elv En) 6/vv1 CA- Liv Cc MIL K st-v--eia34-re, p- c battAo-eA- Sig urn Address: iM t/ ae,(4,116 tired-, KS. kq eex..0;$- - 1,e41,(b 66.E I�11&/t( lii;i qgfk E eyU30 3srWWA"o 14,4 114/_....J ; / , 6 -fl' i / 1c(tykin 12-4 101 i E/5,a4f St /K hip /14 (critkp,eZu l 9cy.-47r 1-20 (-1 C rwcr -qa)g /05 4.6-7-vt1- i /NJ (ice 20 zs f 214 ti 4-L/ t I) Mme. .41FAILW 00\7 lu6 Raz OcM4 AFJOIMIIP/ • 4,I/1f v411\ itt /285 7 4-k Pke,(Q__ 3Pis z ft16Eq <2I /S //L Dg% asq fec,vAloot 7i/ Z i Sfr,A,A( Lf 1$ 96z9- �3t2 P L/L-So3 .` 1)4146 � CA %cJ 538 88 9- .#3e9cl; C 9 a m god 5 3� S. ?ro p hve e a_it i3f -I� w` n (% k.6 1401 Pcif. 5-t *iL cc, 7 H. $ aL ST: pix 13_ Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: 1(-1-~716,_2e ature: Address: ✓" ou4,.e)6 Mz� - c , p. ��Y�(A,rn-a-,^• 72/ (� 4-64 SC4f r( eev �/ , ����G �� 2-46).54, a Fes / G .TA qa-i( .po A-• 2(c,,Afolos -fie Sc ee-e n a -57(7#4,025-4/ cio 2 i/ / se c/K, tli 1oa s �y nb (r)oyeA- 4-ve.ge 80/ a- ; * 6. "ea Sa I 44 o —8 q l 2 E te,EDa, u --to C4O27) z1-1 `.( s?3 9.3-z24/ Moo grAt2,_ /09- er./et 1.:_e_) go-2n— g45-- cS. / B 9(22 cy c4;= if-wc4- dam_ Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. i��v�2 �'Aoil 6� efriorgeok,4c /a v -r Nvv �2i /}-fw Address: 9'6 t1 Q4 / 144 /.Vc 2-50 3p►�` �. tt„f��� 2 V/'7 /1/::1 "7p PI/ / Av ete y : i. /413. Z7 8'771 ST, ?oars(/' `/J/ doh'./ 'a 4/6d� , v v-3 640 54 -f. . �. "*- 15'03 P��w�! �-� 46 (Th 11b - z(( S--73 Sr P etA.B (Plakc� tett • • Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: Signature: 4)7.(1/ (ice l Mm Ck- oos 1' 4rAf►rs 111 ii i Ars, 4110 — A "7 0,4M l ©j r ec c4:2447" itgiMEN.:1 P. �If �! K • yA-N1(4 ,) Ere ,,A LA c J D vie 'fax Address: Y&A /53.5— St -a - /e I m 40' 13r OCA'Loan .er- J5) i•-obnk ¥5 / 5'1/-% cCC 114r os 7 2 6 l c7 &.t. r/ k/ t, q w.1, 4r� Ai�n4 �r r� gp2�7 6"- ��st1. 9v Zsu 60 �"' s - g - t -1(5\7V(6\ 40, PAID) 0-,q ? . Varkalarcto� 1 L &'1' sre 1.0 r> - aLK=. MI PC -/1 -46i12 (720 .2,3..-42_ 146 lac 13,Tp f (12 - I r l cx id e g A 31t0 � iVt xw C ( ?'l ,�, Gsot4tf /'Z 6 keem ce. . # 3a y 1A: fdr • • Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: Signature: :./ `ter' yy, //!: • / �.✓ZCIz J ct's31 4/f -t(' MEW, Address: /3. ric.‘65. N.,/ 44, 31d, ric„uctt,n Bea. 5Dr 0c-4-.'-)> -, ?16 Af.. G-•v4d,}/✓( ✓i (L.6 • ?57 A c3 7 1LJ?-\/ kft -() Cl 60Z t -fie ., P ow i'V()VC0if9402.1 F 192 /9/4974 0.1&- a-7 V. 6.51 /sf s 4 41-.5- fig 7d jz f ,d/ // /// L( 44-1-1 VeZaD,�� 3o r goo Z,' L It � 4774 /?.3, \/ ,/ ic1 e 2t `; ��cr Rb -Eke- ✓i 1 ,e_, 0 211/ . • • Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: ,n.t L J rY b -06-1A A) 690 tAi nnnn'CLllr'r'r S ,rb to G-'01-010,) E//id t`f MieT%J fri Qu+ko Signature: //#*flit • ,:. .r1�.\`r. Arm• AMA 7 riff it Address: %5 i ctyps,ss f P`r'y"), OE- P 1,-4-4 /7z /Z I I Q . /] --eko&o 25/0 n` — if -01 %2 AO 19\ sem. '-- .. ,' ; 7:2-Y fide/. S01t ;; i� 6 z)e'6-- l''t-liLfa-b (61'�' :%df23 3'Y1/ (, /4r. A1•9 yar i1 �L0L77 Q o, ikon Cg j'{rhr1MM qQ1,511 -- V/ 4- S 4[O1 !% 1,7 aaeA '-i-( OG36 g < 24R& ft/ As /562 Pe`a.‘ "11 4/ 2 t4 ‘44.( • • Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. me: f Affarf OM— Cho 3' LbO(4.f rho 411 _ t ale/et c:2 , )&s nyen V Sc—v tit JO Q_ POCK col rtYQ /\941-1 it Si !TteeL ature: IzA , r'4 1I, MVO r ritb l0 • Address: p� 4.-- 530 Aeomoo, AUc, 14'6 • S� r esdt.4N506 -713a 7 2 2/ 57. i4 €'fr JS t Feu-, /ifim45'& i/ 5' 2- ef P /616 Lan/,� ' y b P3 ,»,2 /I e A i'j,O-7'7 46 3gei S-{ .. 4,6 pis s,%� err� ( . 4 f / 9°1-1.1.? -775- •H eruw T 506 EseucumppE % 2EDdtiroo p p 4oa'27 OU E fp),/4 04 77 92- 0/: (Y .47:5 eg? • . Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: Signature: 210 1tilo �v/, f7PM/r1 m-- i j fpr)" • r NGAL �• 0 .1r.g 1.0711r Address: .171 c)-70 /A. 5 5W>eA- �i PLOc E-- 1l_ 3 t 4k Qty. sGs . 757 0-x IApay 1 sAa,3 E. l3 . 422,v, te,r ,51--ti3ek8 (07) 1n^ //JjL� 1,r tNry.-VI ErLem _J©M-,) des 6-b d dpctS - Al lifirmilb_, elMairgfirei iLaLdf /l E;31- . 'R- 9 e r 5 i_1 3A PrO(2C-1— 61-J V;21 � /94J1�S7" cf _ 4) 6L..co/re.._./Z. 6 E- r c P e•-• si et?, - - - e = P etic�- .t n (?L2:v4- 4-zc_116 l KJ'-- ✓,�� G16--) Q Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: Si Ai414/ ,t /Yt / p yc_ 4)6 vYtc-J 5/ob/ C4e,tov1 6w -els ed-d2.r? GUnnd /74.41,4 nt-ny AM Z6 L. SNAGLo it)44, Va Kd l ko,tAas r- i -+`ti -3).[Pr NC p ,. „ -(e t e Q�oZc- Address: 48 f, 4##) 11,;°2-7 - ar'/2 -211 r/k4 r as w a. e. 63‘ l rl Are d L Ye4niat / / / coo ( iaJ yvustoa c►_a.. 902532 Ido y -g sw 3 236,/((�k,5 d, /`l. /6D �(�Sea LA e tr\ 2 77 C2 fir‘A 3 Hy) 1301 tft-57-#b �c • (q// cua-,, wd'Atke A/S: Y'):77 4,9x3 tNvs So 11/- ;amu dim f(d�g, 7c,/ i��,s� - 13- • • Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: CO fi,(DA Signature: I I 70-A .ffA Inv I l bvs7 r�1 L, 1! 1 44)z/fel- Riz--(TY IEP 1k oc J ,f- toffi 7�� fiJ r• Address: C,5 fl'S+- 14-P ♦ 166`wetL 110 S.- l S S 3S /710,0,4 11S -14 A,9 5, ` ?•3 c33 )5 .ik Tb0 .76sas U / {4' - C/7 ? ?i !moo //--ST L-5 I C-9 I '/��/I,Ii //)( /27Q4ha4/ ado\ e 0Q_14 9.0e4t. 27Y7 h -,�� 316 dAL:7)(tIc L 44s l 5* 137, Ole-cit,j 07700 Evtutde 426, f d l C-. 1,..1,Z 7 �C� • • Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: r I r, vt 1- ¢ Ls L.flvi .a)ill M ` �7 CHAS Wor%incra, f/& J2'` ; ger (/a Weft, If PPt koN MuRQHy Address: 044 Currier 040240 & L 3 e( 7eia'"'4A/- nk 4d, CJ AJ r r �ll.v ck-CAA. 31 b 3I -S+- 2-) 06 GrA) $)" S=)' hj Bis s-% /1, t3 ,10,2.44 335 1°,9 -lo" oz . fit./ 0 -/.moi �a3o7 ��.d- ane ikontos&,2tAn Cit" 4oz 5. N-1 C.44' Rs 9 o 271 f7gyyview #g /ca -z1 8 k\ C Dear Customers: As you may have noticed, the westbound traffic on 6th Street (1100 feet West of PCH) has been temporarily closed. The city is seriously considering closing the street permanently after the initial 6 month period. As this will have a significant impact on our customers inconvenience, we are asking everyone to sign our petition to inform the city of the negative impact to the residence and businesses of Hermosa Beach. Name: Ck Signature: meirov' ii Toro -r � �R ►cam Li A/ D6 R&A, `^ f ,cwA A,: ail LAbulth L uQJL P XC e_ I Y ' 4 QUcio -GJvakiNth icc it epi V Address: &aM_ h fdd2,CA R P1/41 8/,,4 M /1.g. 7 bAJa�© &( 109 V& ) Rig, 1' 0 _1 t: srp.�lz f7L(5, 44 64 6 t'' Plc J r /666 w -b// qt -T2-3. 142:7 c4 97 4/c d4 7l' . .ivic6c ,t.D.d. Pia01,554 gQ)S1 ,„2v73 .Q 942.2Sy /, 212 wisNa rxl, Aug er (ot-t 612an-1e (va. t t e A • • HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE March 2, 1999 Mayor Robert Benz and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Proposed Ordinance to Regulate Beach Use & Temporary Events Dear Mayor Benz and Members of the City Council: On behalf of the non-profit organizations listed below, we respectfully request the Council's adoption ,of a resolution to formally oppose the proposed amendment to the city's municipal zoning code known as "The City of Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Act". The author(s) state the reason for the proposed Coastal Preservation Act is to "protect and conserve the beach and ocean waters". This statement is extremely deceptive and should be regarded with immense suspicion. The restrictions in the proposal will eliminate the rights of Hermosa Beach residents to the reasonable use of approximately one-third of their city property. Many of our non-profit organizations sponsor community fundraising events 'that underwrite their activities each year. Others are dependent on their participation in events sponsored by another non-profit group. Our very own community. events will be subject to the irrational and discriminatory restrictions outlined in the proposal. It is imperative that the citizens of Hermosa Beach become aware of the dangers buried in this proposal. Although the author(s) use righteous and noble words such as "Coastal Conservation" in naming this act, many destructive and prejudiced motives lie beneath the surface. ke urge all Hermosa Beach citizens to protect their rights and reject the proposal by. refusing to sign the petition that is being circulated. Page 1 of 3 Y ikbLr dams - an9d • (AM) A7C,-(1A1 • Fax rwn r1(79P,-2594 1 • March 2, 1999 Hermosa Beach City Council Page Two • The Council's opposition to the proposed, ordinance will substantiate the position of our organizations and our mutual corroboration' will convey your ongoing commitment to all of the citizens of Hermosa Beach. Please include this letter on the agenda for the March 9, 1999 City Council meeting. Thank you in advance for your consideration and anticipated support. Sincerely, Ciadit -617 Carol K. Duff President & CEO HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Earl Feys Co -Chair PROJECT TOUCH CAR SHOW Mary Lou Weiss President, Board of Trustees HERMOSA BEACH CITY. SCHOOL DISTRICT J. Travers Devine Co -Chairman ST. PATRICK'S WEEKEND COMMITTEE Abel Ybarra Chairman ALOHA DAYS SURF CONTEST AND HAWAIIAN FESTIVAL Roger Carlson President HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB Dick McCurdy President HERMOSA BEACH SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION Jean Lombardo President President HERMOSA BEACH WOMAN'S CLUB Page 2 of 3 March 2, 1999 Hermosa Beach City Council Page Three Mary Lou Weiss Betty Evans Manager Member • HERMOSA BEACH FARMERS MARKET HERMOSA BEACH GARDEN CLUB Jerry Davidson President, HERMOSA BEACH YOUTH BASKETBALL LEAGUE Christine Hollander, President HERMOSA BEACH - COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION Jackie Labouff, Exec. Director Greg Ronkainen, President HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB Charlotte Lesser Program Administrator BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT Charlotte Malone PROJECT TOUCH FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY • • HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE March 9, 1999 Mayor Robert Benz and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Proposed Ordinance to Regulate Beach Use & Temporary Events Dear Mayor Benz and Members of the City Council: On behalf of the non-profit organizations listed below, we respectfully request the Council's adoption of a resolution to formally oppose the proposed amendment to the city's municipal zoning code known as "The City of Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Act". The author(s) state the reason for the proposed Coastal Preservation Act is to "protect and conserve the beach and ocean waters". This statement is extremely deceptive and should be regarded with immense suspicion. The restrictions in the proposal will eliminate the rights of Hermosa Beach residents to the reasonable use of approximately one-third of their city property. Many of our non-profit organizations sponsor community fundraising events that underwrite their activities each year. Others are dependent on their participation in events sponsored by another non-profit group. Our very own community events will be subject to the irrational and discriminatory restrictions outlined in the proposal. It is imperative that the citizens of Hermosa Beach become aware of the dangers buried in this proposal. Although the author(s) use righteous and noble words such as "Coastal Conservation" in naming this act, many destructive and prejudiced motives lie beneath the surface. We urge all Hermosa Beach citizens to protect their rights and reject the proposal by refusing to sign the petition that is being circulated. Page 1 of 3 1007 Hermosa Avenue • Hermosa Beach, California 90254 • (310) 376-0951 • FAX (310) 798-2594 March 9, 1999 Hermosa Beach City Council Page Two The Council's opposition to the proposed ordinance will substantiate the position of our organizations and our mutual corroboration will convey your ongoing commitment to all of the citizens of Hermosa Beach. Please include this letter on the agenda for the March 9, 1999 City Council meeting. Thank you in advance for your consideration and anticipated support. Sincerely, (coati:kg Carol K. Duff President & CEO HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Earl Feys Treasurer PROJECT TOUCH Mary Lou Weiss Member, Board of Trustees HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT /Ar7-6-----)41144 J. Travers Devine Co -Chairman ST. PATRICK'S WEEKEND COMMITTEE Chairman ALOHA DAYS SURF CONTEST AND HAWAIIAN FESTIVAL Roger Carlson President HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB Dick McCurdy President HERMOSA BEACH SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION an Lombardo President HERMOSA BEACH WOMAN'S CLUB Page 2 of 3 March 9, 1999 Hermosa Beach City Council Page Three Yv ri a_ Founder HE • BEACH WOMANS CLUB EVENING DIVISION Mary Lou Weiss Manager HERMOSA BEACH FARMERS MARKET Greg Ronkainen, President HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB Christine Hollander, President HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION 41111 'Jackie Labouff, Exec. Lrector PROJECT TOUCH Page 3 of 3 • • The Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Committee 1124 Highland Ave. Box 241 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 www.ourcoast.org Contact: Donley Falkenstien City of Hermosa Beach City Managers office March 3, 1999 Dear City Manager Burrell; For and in consideration of the concerns expressed in the city's analysis of our proposed measure, the Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Committee is hereby submitting the ballot initiative petition titled "The City of Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Act" for modification by the City of Hermosa Beach. The measure in the mean time will continue to push toward qualification for the ballot but will be temporarily withdrawn from circulation upon receipt of suggested modifications from the City. It is therefore necessary that modifications be received by no later than the March 22, 1999 City Council meeting. All reasonable modifications will be implemented provided that the modifications promote the following objectives: (1) The effective reduction of the parking nightmare associated with some temporary events; (2) Protect community based non-commercial temporary events; (3) Protect property values by protecting the quality and health of our coast and coastal waters; (4) Increase clarity of the measure. With this offer we are extending you a one-time opportunity to address the nagging problems imposed on a large segment of the residents and businesses in our city by temporary events. It is our sincere hope that you will accept this offer in the spirit of cooperation and act in a productive and meaningful way. Sincerely, Donley Falkenstien Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Committee member. 1 • Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Committee 1124 Highland Ave. Box 241 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 www.ourcoast.org March 9, 1999 MBCCC' (DRAFT) statement of intent regarding temporary events in the coastal zone and proposal. For reference only. As residents in close proximity to the coastal zone where many commercial events take place we take special interest in protecting the integrity of our beaches and coastal waters. We are very concerned about the trend of turning our beach into just another "commercial zone" for sale to commercial interests. We urge the city to take a strong role in preventing the beach from turning into just another commercial zone. Judging from our experience, (and indeed the Coastal Commissions experience) in dealing with the city of Hermosa Beach, this issue cannot be safely left in the loosely restricted discretion of local officials. We urge the voters to adopt these guidelines which would apply mostly during the summer season and closely regulate and restrict proposed coastal zone events which involve any of the following: (1) Substantial impact on parking and the flow of traffic, (2) extensive advertising content, and (3) attendance of more than five hundred people. At a minimum, approval of such events should be at a public hearing and be appealable to the City or the Coastal Commission. Further, we state again our opposition to paid admission on the beach. Please note additionally however, that even events without paid admission can be violative of the goal of preservation of the coastal zone. Event promoters will make it their business to push the envelope as far as the City Council will allow it to go. As it stands today the discretion of City officials concerning exempt temporary events (CEQA) is excessive. Without appealability to the City or Coastal Commission the situation is further aggravated. Essentially the City has the power to approve without requiring a permit and without any public notice or hearing. In addition, the city lacks rules or limits on the impact events can have, including the following: No limit on number of events, particularly during summer No limit on advertising placed on the beach No limit on the number of prime parking spaces given exclusively to event promoters No limit on the impacts to nearby commercial and residential properties No limit on traffic congestion or diesel fumes in heavily pedestrian areas No limit to the parking nightmare from events This measure was modeled on the Manhattan Beach Coastal Conservation Act. The authors of this measure are... Approximately 80% Coastal Commission staff text; 20% Coastal Commissioners, Manhattan Beach City Council / Planning Commission, Citizen Representatives. California allows its citizens to make laws directly through initiatives placed on election ballots. This is direct democracy and we support it. In seeking ballot access we enhance the ability to make coastal conservation the focus of citywide and statewide discussion. On the city's side, they have imposed a burden on the coast which they fail to justify. The political leadership or lack thereof has annulled the voice of many persons who feel now that the politicians are not responsive to their needs. The City' s dominant justification appears to be its strong interest in the extreme commercialization of the beach as a means to make money. i.e.: A cash cow. This act proposes written guidelines that for the first time in the history of this city will carefully control the impact of events. The days of nightmare parking gridlock and streams of idling cars will begin to be addressed. All events who exceed the impact thresholds must apply for a permit at a noticed public hearing and the permit issuance must be appealable to the City or the Coastal Commission. Priority consideration is given to events that require the coast in order to function at all, such as surfing contests. Problems/violations of the past are not subject to the application of a current penalty. There is a three year penalty period for promoters who fail to mitigate their negative impacts after three years. This measure doesn't manage events, it lessens their impact l • • It doesn't say no amplified sound, it says monitor it This measure doesn't say how big an event can be, it says keep it under control Sound, traffic and parking utilization will be monitored during the initial period. It proposes no barriers to the use of inflatable advertising or stands. This measure doesn't tell event promoters what to do, it says you decide how you get there but just get there The Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Act does five (5) main things; (1) It bans paid admission to the beach for any reason including events, (2) It ends the parking nightmare from events in the coastal zone, (3) It sends a voter message to the City to make polluted storm drain diversion a top -ten priority, (4) It eliminates permanent advertising on beach trash cans and lifeguard towers (is anybody really concerned that McDonalds has a hamburger special? or that Mountain Dew is still available?), (5) It uses revenues from event permits for coastal conservation measures including a one time payment to the County to pay for the removal of beach advertising. We have gone through the considerable effort to prepare and submit for review and approval revisions to local regulations (or lack thereof) in connection with this issue. We urge all citizens of Hermosa Beach and all interested parties to carefully consider each of these proposed revisions, and the critical goals these revisions would work towards achieving: (1) preservation of the natural state of the beach to the greatest possible extent, (2) preserve beach access to the general public - particularly those who must have parking in order to have any access at all, (3) preservation of the public beach as a beach and not as an unlimited commercial site, (4) detailed enough provisions so that the City's powers and obligations are clearly defined, the event applicant understands what is expected of it (and the consequences of violation of those expectations), and in the event an appeal or Coastal Commission review is needed, the record presented for appeal/Coastal Commission review will contain enough detailed information and fmdings for the City or Coastal Commission to avoid having to "reinvent the wheel" in order to be fully aware of the issues before it, (5) provisions for adequate public notice, rights and remedies concerning temporary events. You cannot simultaneously protect the integrity of the public beach and approve paid admission on it. We also note to you that while the City claims to protect the integrity of the public beach while solely in the hands of the government of the City of Hermosa Beach, the City government itself does not seem to recognize this solemn obligation. At the last hearing in which the City Council approved 100% paid admission on the beach (which the Coastal Commission later rejected), the council made the emphatic point that they understood that the Coastal Commissioners were the guardians of the beach (as opposed to the City Council of Hermosa Beach.) This, we believe, exhibits a careless disregard for the obligations undertaken by the City Council in preservation of the public beach and underscores the need for intervention by the citizens of Hermosa Beach and certainly does not warrant subjecting the coastal zone to the loosely defined powers of the City. To allow the City to do so is inconsistent with the City' s agreement to preserve the beach, as spelled out, among other places, the Grant Deed(s) deeding this area to the City and given the Coastal Commissions unfavorable experience with Hermosa Beach on the subject of temporary events, is simply too much unrestricted power to repose unchecked, with the City Council. It appears that some may have lost sight that this is a predominantly residential area and that the vast majority of property adjacent to the beach is residential and that the residents have expended substantial funds to live on dime size lots by a beach, not next to a site for carnivals, mass concerts, or whatever events a promoter can dream up. The residents' right to quiet enjoyment of their homes as provided for in the Coastal Act often seems to count for nothing. We note to you as an example, the City's cavalier approval last summer of a free concert on the beach with an expected attendance of 25,000 people (more than doubling the City's population) without knowing who would be headlining the event and without the existence of a parking and traffic control mitigation plan or any other plan to limit the impact on businesses or residents. W`e have witnessed a trend towards the intensification of beach events to the point that we are awash in blaring PA's, chatter, forty foot inflatable beer advertisements, traffic snarls, parking nightmares, unruly crowds etc., etc., etc. We all know that event promoters feel duty bound to wring the last possible dollar out of their events, whether through saturation with advertising and/or creating a spectacle to attract attention and attendance at their event. We must act with foresight here. The pursuit of this Council is the functional equivalent of building a "road" to the beach for event promoters. Once you build such a road, it will certainly be used. This is an affluent community with an attractive beach area. This will not be lost on event promoters. They have and will pursue permits aggressively. They will be concerned exclusively with generating the greatest possible profits for themselves, not with any benefit or detriment to the community. They will not lightly accept rejection. They will tie up the City and its residents with endless applications, appeals, hearings and legal proceedings and, you 2 • • can be sure, at some point a promoter and/or his lawyer will argue that the City has provided him an entitlement. These concerns are not exaggerated. These concerns are real and are borne out by comparable situations involving for example, a lawsuit pursued by a commercial event promoter challenging a California Coastal Commission decision to deny a permit which involved 100% paid admission on the beach. We are certain that no other residential area of Hermosa Beach would tolerate the introduction of such an intrusion. We refect the City Councils "argument" that coastal zone residents deserve this poor treatment by choosing to live in the coastal zone. This "argument" is not only offensive, it is also wrongheaded and underscores the City's lack of a sufficient defense for their actions. Coastal zone residents, who pay a fortune to live near the beach on "mini -lots" are entitled to have the beach treated as a beach, not a hyper -intensive commercial zone for commercial interests. As the City has become a more commercially aggressive enterprise, so has it attracted more and more aggressive commercial event promoters. The commercial event which has gained the most notoriety in connection with this subject is the AVP events. In this case, the promoter threatened to "pull" their event unless the City acquiesced to their demand to approve 100% paid admission to their beach event. While we recognize some events have some historical roots in the community, the events as they exist today have nothing in common with the small scale, community based, non -commercialized events of just a few years ago. Now, to further aggravate the situation, the City of Hermosa Beach is essentially a joint venturer, giving hard earned taxpayer dollars to commercial event promoters and sharing profits with event operators. Among other things, this position has plainly compromised the City' s ability to objectively weigh the promoters application for a permit. This was demonstrated when the City Council approved a permit that included 100% paid admission in the face of widespread and vigorous opposition. The City's turning a blind eye continued all the way through the approval process. In addition, the City allows commercial event operators what no other contractor in the city is legally permitted to do in Hermosa Beach - to perform construction activities as early as 7:00 a.m. each day of the week. Regarding paid admission, even if, with all good intention, you believe that such events will not be approved, we submit that you are in error (paid admission on the beach coming up on next meeting agenda?). As demonstrated by the controversy over recent events, we cannot rest assured that in the cyclical political climate a "case by case" discretionary evaluation of each proposed event would provide adequate protections. Further, how can you assure the citizens of our city that they will not have to attend endless hearings on applications for such events, or that the city will not waste its time and money getting tied up in proceedings dealing with various promoters applications? We have undertaken to preserve and protect the coastal zone. The City Council of Hermosa Beach has demonstrated its unwillingness to do so. The citizens of Hermosa Beach are the last guardians of this critical and unique natural resource. It is not a commodity. It is not to be squandered or sold or treated with disrespect. You must not be participants or passive bystanders as the beach becomes another commodity to be bought and sold. This issue will now be in the hands of the people of Hermosa Beach. Thank you. We were prepared to present a list of our committee members but have decided to wait until the Hermosa Chamber of commerce takes steps to reel in its out -of -control management. The following are comments relative to the city staff report This measure does not limit the current City Council's practice of waiving permit fees, event banner fees, amplification permit fees, parking fees and the bestowing of taxpayer funds directly out of the general fund into the pockets of commercial event operators Those funds are paid out of the taxpayers pocket for the benefit of commercial for-profit event operators. Regarding page 1 staff comments: 1) The measure is complicated, confusing, and duplicitous. This proposed measure is an in-depth measure. Obviously it takes a "walking through the process" to understand how it works. Confusion is by virtue of the fact that staff are 3 • • experiencing a case of the "newbies" in determining function. In an effort to be sure no stones remain unturned, the proposed measure makes clear its intentions by repeating certain phrases to ensure compliance, had we failed to close as many loopholes as possible we are confident based on the Councils demonstrated lack of concern that the City would run a Mack truck through it. As it stands today, there are no limits or standards which can be or are applied to limiting the impact of temporary events which arelilkompatible with the residences and businesses in the coastal zone. Important to remember is that this proposed measure does not manage events, it manages their resultant negative impacts. 2) The inclusion of the entire coastal zone: As you may know the coastal zone boundaries have changed since 1980. The area covered in the coastal zone has shrunk and there are currently plans to further shrink those boundaries under the proposed 1999 Coastal Act. Impacts are impacts no matter where they occur. We reject the City's "argument" that coastal zone residents deserve this poor treatment because they choose to live in the coastal zone. These residents pay a fortune to live on dime sized lots next to the beach, not next to a site for unlimited heavy impact commercial events put on by commercial operators who will be concerned only with how much money they can squeeze out of their events and not with any detriment to the residents and businesses in the area. It is notable that staff indicates that charitable, civic and school events "could" be effected. The only way these events would require a permit is if they are held on the weekend or holiday between May 1 and September 30 in the coastal zone between the hours of 9:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; AND include any of the following: propose an attendance of 500 or more attendees; and/or is on the beach AND proposes to display more than 100 square feet of commercial advertising on the beach; and /or requires the issuance of more than 20 exclusive se parking passes for parking spaces which are otherwise available to th@tligial and/or which in conjunction with other planned or approved temporary events would cause closure of public parking lots in the coastal zone or create a cumulative attendance of 500 or more people between the hours of 9:30 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. or proposes live amplified music on the beach. All other uses including an unlimited number of weekday events year-round would be exempt from permit requirements. However, the Community Development Director could require a permit if he/she deems it necessary. 3) Page two of staff report, Pier Ave.: There are no events scheduled for Pier Ave. Therefor no events would be affected by this proposed measure. Lower Pier Ave. has no parking and therefore also would not be affected. Beach concerts (new): Currently there appears to be less than the attendance threshold requirement to require parking mitigation measures. Obviously as these events grow larger as they may, there may be future mitigation's required. It is important to point out that certain members of this Council have publicly stated that these concerts could have paid admission and be used as a revenue generating tool for the City. This proposed measure would ensure that these events would remain free for all to enjoy for years to come. Triathlon (relatively new):This event is held outside the period and as such would not be regulated by this proposed measure. Sand and Strand race (historical): This event is completed early in the day and is not held during the period and therefor would not be affected by this proposed measure. l` C • • Special consideration is given to this type of community-based non-commercial event to ensure it would not be affected by this proposed measure. CBVA tournament (annual -multiple events); This event occurs several times during the year - mostly outside of the May 1 to Sept. 30 period and has commercial advertising on the sandy beach in excess of 100 s.f.. It is possible their schedule may have to be adjusted in 2000 to reflect a single event during the period or limiting commercial advertising placed on the beach to no more than 100 square feet. This would allow the event to occur without being affected by this proposed measure. This event would be able to comply with the proposed measure by simply having its advertising be one-sided instead of two-sided. AAU surfing tournament: (age unknown) This is a community-based event with almost non- existent impact. This proposed measure protects this type of event. by ensuring that events which are "coastal dependent events" are given priority consideration - such as this surfing event. There would be no affect on this event. Chevron surf camp: (age unknown) Another community-based non -impact event. This proposed measure would have no affect on this event. Project Touch car show: (age unknown) Another community-based non -impact event. This proposed measure would have no affect on this event. Saint Patrick's Day Parade: (recent) This event is held outside the regulated period and therefore would not be affected by this proposed measure. The associated street vending shuts down heavily traveled streets and has demonstrated its ability to create a heavy parking impact. However, this event is not affected by this proposed measure but could be directed to mitigate its impact by the Community Development Director if he/she believes it to be necessary. PTSA school carnival: (age unknown) this community-based event is held on Halloween - outside the period of May 1 through September 30 - The authors feel that this event therefore would not be affected by this proposed measure. One of the main objectives of this proposed measure is to protect community-based events while restricting primarily commercial events. Spring egg hunt: (age unknown) This community-based event which lasts less than 2 hours, has little or no impact whatsoever and is held outside the impact period. The proponents of this proposed measure take strong exception to "using" children in the City Council and chamber of commerce's political spin tactics. The proposed measure would have no affect on is event. Hermosa Beach film festival: As it exists today, this community-based event is operated after hours in facilities designed to accommodate their impact which is minor in nature. The beach screenings are attended after hours and do not meet the threshold requirements for impact mitigation. This proposed measure will have no affect on this event. Aloha Days surf contest and festival: (new -revived) This culturally oriented community- based event includes as its primary event a surf contest. Surfing events are protected under this proposed measure, although the event may meet the threshold for permit requirements today it is i believed to have significant impact on parking in the future and may then require mitigation measures. Presently the proponents of this measure S believe this event would not be significantly affected by this proposed measure. West Coast Artists Art Festival: This event occurs on the community center lawn during the impact period but is located outside the coastal zone, and as such this proposed measure would have no affect on this event. • • Chamber of Commerce' Fiesta de las Artes: This event occupies streets and parking spaces which are in critical, demand during two of the three holidays of the summer seasons peak beach access periods for a total of six days. There is no public review or oversight of this event. In addition, the city has given this event a five year contract without the inclusion of a suitable impact management plan. The events are believed to generate nearly a half million dollars in income to the chamber, of which the city gets nearly nothing. The event places giant inflatable advertisements on the beach even though its boundaries do not extend onto the public beach. This measure would -be-qin the process of determining the totality of the impacts imposed and would require substantial mitigation. This event could easily afford measures required to bring it into consistency with this measure. Regrettably, the city would likely increase the taxpayer monies given to the chamber to provide for its shuttle, though it has the ability to protect taxpayers and require the chamber to pay transportation costs for its own event. New years eve event: (recent) This event is held after hours and outside the impact period and would not be affected by this measure. Section 2.F No permanent commercial advertising on beach facilities: Until recently (since this councils duration) there was little or no permanent commercial advertising on beach facilities. These advertisements were placed on the beach without a Coastal Commission permit as required. As witnessed in recent years, the commission rejected heavily commercialized "sunshelters" that were imposed on the beach by the county without the commissions consent. The sunshelters were forcibly removed. In addition, the county has seen fit to nearly quadruple without reason or limitation the number of trash cans on the beach in an effort to create more "billboard" advertising space. This measure would bring the city in line with cities such as Santa Monica that has zero advertising on its natural resource beach. There are virtually no places one can go anymore to escape the relentless pursuit of commercial advertisers. Do we really care about McDonalds hamburger deal while relaxing on the beach? This measure protects taxpayers by making the for-profit commercial event operators pay to maintain the beach they use. The funds from events are limited to maintaining the beach and recreational equipment in this proposed measure. Section 2.G: Storm drain diversion: This section is intentionally written to allow the city the flexibility it needs to make decisions based on the cities ability to fund projects. This section doesn't tell the city how much to spend, or how to spend it. It says make it a top ten priority and get the job done. As we have all witnessed in recent years, thecity had to be sued before it would take action or responsibility for its own proportion of the responsibility to reduce polluted storm drain run-off into our ocean. This measure brings attention to the critical need to act on this matter. Section 2.G: Year-round sea water quality testing: The operative word that seems to be conveniently over looked here is; shall "ensure"... This measure_. only requires the city to ensure testing is accomplished. It does not say the city must do the testing or pay for it, it only say ensure it is accomplished. If for same reason no testing will be forthcoming, then the city would have to make arrangements to ensure the testing is done. This section would require little or no cost from the city. • Section 2.H Revenues derived directly from events deposited in Conservation Fund: Ambiguous. Funds which the city wishes to give to charities may continue to given to charities. The city does not identify which funds are being given to charities and therefore it is impossible to address this question. Charitable vendor booths etc. at events would continue without limitation by this proposed measure. This measure • . protects taxpayers by requiring the funds the city receives from event operators to be used to maintain the beach they use. Section 2.H: Most of this question has already been addressed above. Nothing in this measure requires the city to approve or pay for a marine research related facility on the pier. It simply allows the use of the Coastal Conservation Fund to be used for this purpose if i4c becomes a reality in the future. Monitoring of sound incompatible with the surrounding residential and commercial:properties in the area of the event, and of parking and traffic conditions in the area of the event: The efforts of the third party would obviously be directed by the city council, based on the scope of the event and documentation from the same previous event. This measure makes no limitation whatsoever on the city's ability to monitor any aspect of events. Notable during the AVP event in July of 1998, the AVP announcer over the loud speaker incited the crowd to approach 'the protesters outside the venue and "throw down their signs" thus creating a dangerous situation for the protesters who were overwhelmingly out numbered. The city has claimed "no knowledge" and no investigation has been conducted. This measure would not establish continuous monitoring, but would require monitoring of live amplified music only for the first three years or first three events only, to determine the impact and compliance with the noise ordinance. The question of who hires the independent monitor is left as an open question to ensure flexibility. Section 17.76.060(5) Mechanical/electronic advertising: This measure does not limit the use of score boards of any kind. Staff indicates some large-scale events may be discouraged from coming to our public beach. Does this mean the city would allow commercial events of any kind? Is it OK for operators to dig huge sand pits to entertain sand drag races? Where are the limitations on the exploitation our sandy beach? The. problem with staff is they have no, sense, we should all bend over backwards to accommodate any commercial project that an operator can think up. Why don't we invite the San Francisco Forty-Niners to come play on our beach, forget the fact that the city is in deficit parking, or that the beach is a natural resource worth protecting. After all the city could use the exposure and more money! Staff report page 5 Section 17.76.060(5) Person available at a central location to respond to residents etc.: Event operators are unaccountable because no one can be found to be in charge. This measure does not require the city to provide employees for this requirement. This is more staff spin. Events would have zero problem identifying a central location where one of their personnel could be available. This provision would haveno cost to the city. Section 17.76.060(7) No concurrent events over 1,000 attendance: This provision is necessary to limit the city's ability to subvert the measures intended limitation of impacts by simply approving events together such as having the AVP event at the same time as the Chambers Fiesta de las Artes, just as the city has done in the past. There would be no separation of responsibility and hence no accountability. Had this not been included we are confident the city would be arguing the other side of the question. The city cannot have it both ways. Community-based events are protected under this measure yet staff continues the thinly veiled "spin" to create the idea in the minds of the people behind these community-based events that somehow their event is threatened. This measure will have no effect on combining events under 1000 people. Is staff saying a thousand people enjoy the pancakes with the fire personnel? Section 17.76.060(9) No sales of any kind on the sandy beach: The beach has turned in to just another commercial sales zone. The beach is not zoned for commercial sales yet staff and the City Council blissfully ignore this glaring fact. Does staff feel it is too much to ask for commercial sales to be limited to the pier, or on Pier Ave.? • • The solution is obvious. This measure will notaffect inthe commercial sales of any event held on the beach. Section 17.76.060.(11) Parking lots under Coastal Commission Permit restrictions: Again staff blissfully ignores the fact the city agreed in writing to restrictions on the lots in return for approval of other expansions of businesses without providing parking for them. This measure will have no effect of the Farmers Market because it is not a temporary event and it is not in the coastal zone. If the Chamber of. Commerce's Farmers Market encounters a problem with its current location, it is because the city is knowingly, intentionally and willingly violating an agreement it made with the Coastal Commission. Only the Coastal Commission or,the City could affect the Chambers' Farmers Market location. If there is any question as to the validity of this please contact Pam Emerson at the commissions Long Beach office at 1 562 590-4071. Staff also indicates the green belt as being used to minimize impacts on beach lots. Under the permit the city agreed to in writing, the greenbelt lot IS A BEACH LOT and is restricted from use for other purposes. Staff should check their facts. Section 17.76.060(11): Same as above. The city agreed in writing to protect these lots from other uses. The city cannot back out of its agreement out of convenience. We all have to live with our contracts, the city is no different. Nothing in this measure requires to spend a dime on monitoring these lots. Staff attempts to indicate concern because a street may get backed up in monitoring lots along the greenbelt. Yet staff ignores the traffic gridlock associated with a growing number of events who shut down city streets so they can sell more merchandise on the parking spaces the people so desperately seek. Where is the credibility on this issue? Everybody would like to get out cheap. "We cant afford it" is the cry. The city doesn't give the time of day to people who complain of the increasing impacts on their daily lives. Incredible in this whole process is that this measure speaks to the environmental impacts, but all the city can talk about is the financial impacts. This measure does not force the city to increase its costs one penny. The city chooses to increase its costs by approving an increasing litany of high impact events. Section 17.76.060(12b) document the impacts and compliance: Without documentation of the impacts one could never know what must be done to cure the ill. If a doctor doesn't look down your throat he's never going to know you have tonsillitis. Obviously the first step is to document the impact. Next year when the event operator is asking approval, we will have a leg to stand on when we decide what needs to be done to help the operator mitigate his impacts. Each succeeding year it will become clearer and clearer as to whether the operator is making a serious effort to comply. This measure gives the city the ability to extend the time an event operator has to comply. In all an event is given up to FIVE YEARS TO COMPLY. Any operator who needs more than five years is clearly not a responsible operator. Operators that show they don't care would end up taking their impact elsewhere. Without fire under their rears, motivation will be not. Staff are not required to prepare these reports, event operator monitors are. The city receives the reports and simply files them. This measure would only require the minimal effort on the part of staff and would not require additional cost. Section 17.76.060(14) Comprehensive report. Covered in response to 17.76.060(12c). Section 17.76.060(14) Final report: The final report is assembled by the event operator not a third party. Monitored results are passed on to the operator who is responsible to file it with the city. We have seen by example with the AVP that no matter what you ask them to do, unless they perceive the demand as serious, they will give every excuse except compliance. The AVP was required twice to submit a final report to the Coastal Commission documenting compliance with permit conditions. No report was ever filed, the city knew it • • and turned a blind eye. This provision will guarantee event operators take permit compliance seriously. Section 17.76.060(15) Permit requirements: ONLY Events which meet the minimum thresholds require a permit; May 1 -September 30 with 500 or more on the weekend in the coastal zone Events over 1500 require review for their impacts. Staff uses the term "extensive bureaucratic process" as a political argument, and lacks objectivity to justify the opposition. The process in her office is no different today than it will be for any event she hasn't already reviewed. We are confident she has previously reuiewed all of the events listed, leaving the question, what extensive bureaucratic process, a process which consists of the Parks & Recreation and the City Council. Section 17.76.060(16) Exemptions: Nothing in this measure denies the city the ability to request a permit. Section 17.76.060(16b) This provision exempts the two events from restrictions regarding impact as long as the events are consistent with previous occurrences. The city retains the ability to review each event. Section 17.76.060(18) Notice of determination: Regularly occurring events are scheduled well in advance regardless of this provision. We anticipate this will have negligible impact. Section 17.76.060(18) Inspect site: Inspection for compliance is only required for the first three occurrences on an event. Initial increase of the Community Development Director workload. Increase is not during regular business hours and would not impact staff workload. The increase would depend on how many high impact events the city wishes to approve. Section 17.76.060(19) Website: This provision allows public accountability through access to important information and could be placed on the same web pages that currently exists on the city's website. Minimal staff resources required. Section 17.76.080 Application made. This measure provides for the application to be made to the Director of Community Development, however does not restrict review to the Department of Community Development. Staff could simply be transferred to cover the same task. Section 17.76.080(D) Posting public notice: Staff considers a public notice at the site of an event "visual blight" but makes no such subjective note of a forty foot inflatable tequila bottle on the beach blocking views. Public notice at the beach area would be posted on a public notice board which this measure provides for at the foot of the Pier. The importance of public notice cannot be underestimated. Section 17.76.080(A) Limit on commercial advertising: This proposed measure would limit commercial sponsors ability to "order" more advertising on the beach. 2 thousand square feet is a banner 10 feet high and one hundred feet long and exceeds the amount of commercial advertising in all forms displayed at the WVA tournaments (triple the amount placed at NBA games). This provision allows events of this magnitude to occur, in addition the events can have an unlimited amount of commercial advertising located along Pier Ave or on the pier. Without a definitive list of which businesses gain from heavy impact events and which lose there can only continue to be speculation on this question. Part of an overall strategy for a Council that had a true interest in limiting negative impacts would be to define the list and address the impacts. q • • Section 17.76.080(8-22) Final Report: Partially assembled by the monitor, balance by the applicant and city. This section provides flexibility on the part of the City Council. Staff does not provide adequate detail to allow an appropriate response. Section 17.76.170(A)Violations: Staff creates more spin to make it appear that persons who violate "permit application requirements" are subject to criminal penalties. This section relates penalties to those who fail to get a permit for their event which requires a permit. Staff may remember back just a couple of years ago when the AVP failed to get a permit from the Coastal Commission–yet the city refused to do anything about it. This measure guarantees this will not occur again. Law may forbid ads on beach by Thomas Weede In a lawsuit recently filed against the city and city officials over a planned 480 -space down- town Hermosa Beach parking structure by a resident and group called "Keep Hermosa Beautiful Committee," their attorney has said that an agreement between HERMOSA BEACH the county and the city to fund the structure contains provisions that are prohibited by Hermosa law. Under the agreement with the county, the city gives the county the right to advertise on such beach structures as lifeguard tow- ers, tideboards, trash cans, public restrooms and the parking struc- ture. The agreement states that "(n)ame/product identification shall only be displayed on equipment that is involved in providing a public service and shall not di- rectly solicit the sale of any product." In fact, the city code does prohibit solici- tation and certain sign displays on the beach. Under city law "no person shall solicit in any manner or for any purpose, or sell or offer for sale any foods, refreshments, drinks or other goods, wares or merchan- dise. or distribute or pass out any handbills, advertising matter or literature upon the beach or strand... Hermosa City Manager Steve Burrell said that the "no solicitation" law does not apply to the city's agreement with the Bounty for advertising, and that the law ap- plies to in-person solicitation. "To me, solicitation doesn't mean a sign.'' Burrell said. The city code also provides that "no scenic values or other public interests should be harmed as a result of signing." Also pro- n hibited are "billboards" and signs that "ad- vertise any activity, business, product or Ir service no longer conducted on the premises u upon which the sign is located, including oft - site signs.' Back in 1987, when the city was first considering a formal agreement with the county Co have advertising on the beach. city stall — after citing an earlier (and similar no -solicitation law — indicated -in a memo- randum to the City Council that it would re- quire a change in the no -solicitation law. The law has remained substantially the same, however. Dusty Brogan, head of marketing for the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors, said that business advertising of one t'orm or another on county area beaches goes back many years, with it ini- tially involving informal advertising by local businesses. In the 1970s. Coppertone do- nated trash cans with their logo, but there was no advertising fee paid. In the late 1980s. the advertising took on more formalized approach when the WAVE adio station began paying the county for the fight to sponsor trash cans with their lo_o. d more recently beginning in the early ot`I70s advertisements have begun to appear ;o0.1 lifeguard towers and other structures. to 314 Sunday, March 7, 1999 Briefs Stretch of beach remains closed F The beach from Temescal Canyon Road to Sunset Boule-" yard and Pacific Coast High= .way remained closed Saturday ','.:after routine monitoring of the water showed sewage may be `4present. 4 County health officials closed the beach Friday. Thee' closure, which covers about a t,mile of beach, . will ,continue' until tests of water. samples ‘,..show acceptable bacteria , ' counts, according to ,the De- partment of Health Services. Officials also reminded beach- ;sfgoers to stay out of water near --,storm drains for at least 72 hours after stormy weather. Rain is predicted for today. • • The Beach Reporter • May 22, 1997 — Government for the people For once you have won. In an era of giant corporate mergers which are seldom good for the employee or the consumer; in an era of crooked politics being status quo at the highest level of .,overnment; and in an era of ,:ornmercialization of nearly all aspects of nature, you have finally won a little victory. The beach is yours and no city that butts up against it can compromise that fact in any way. I'm talking about the California Coastal Commis - EACH by Cara Murphy sion's recent blow to the Association of Volleyball Professionals (AVP) and all beach cities that have been subjugating the public's beach — a re- gional park — for profit. Finally, you have an example of a governmental body mak- ing a decision with no motive other than to put the interest of the many ahead of the bank accounts of a few. It is also a perfect example of why a regulatory body with broad oversight is so important. You give the discretion to cities and it seems, sadly, they will always sell out the public's interest to a commercial venture. Members of both the Hermosa and Manhattan city councils have expressed indignation about the decision. Both face losing an AVP tournament this summer. The councils whine that the Coastal Commission's action is a removal of local 'control. Well, if this is how local control works in Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach then those councils can't be trusted with it. The reason the state Coastal Com- mission was created was to ensure that the public's ac- cess to the beach is not hin- dered and that the coast is protected. The coastline is a valuable real estate commod- ity, and everyone and their brother would want a piece of it if it was opened up to commercialization or sale._ Look at the ease with which 'the Hermosa council agreed to let the AVP charge 100 percent admission at its tour- nament last year. Look at how they didn't bat an eye when the AVP erected a fence around the tournament. Without proper oversight, you get paid admission tournaments and you get the deals made with the county to usethe beach for advertising. You get the county erecting sun shelters and kiosks for adver- tising along The. Esplanade in Redondo Beach, an issue the Coastal Commission is still fighting them over. The City Councils behave like spoiled brats that have had everything handed to I them and then throw a tantrum when I someone finally says "no." It's not as if ' these cities aren't making enough money off the beach already. They hug the coast and the primary reason anyone visits Manhattan or Hermosa is not because there are more Starbucks per square mile or there is such a diversity of bars and restaurants; it's because of the beach. I Would our property values be so high if it weren't for the beach? If either city's western border were just one mile inland 1 they would be completely different cities. I Clearly, an elected body needn't always do what the public pressures them to do. But the principle here is public park land. The beaches are maintained with regional taxpayer money, not city money. In Her- mosa, it is true that the city trades out with the county the right to advertise on the beach in exchange for cleaning and life- guard services. But recall the complaints from the Hermosa Beach City Council when the county wanted to charge the city for beach maintenance. "That would be like charging the resi- dents twice," the council said. And that was exactly right. Everyone in Los Angeles County contributes to beach maintenance and lifeguard services be cause the beach is a regional park. In that situation, for Hermosa residents to pay again simply because they live in the city that borders the beach wouldn't be fair. So how is it OK for any city — simply ' because it borders the beach — to use the beach for profit and allow events that ex- clude access to those who aren't willing to pay? How is it fair to effectively charge a resident twice to access his beach? It's interesting that in Manhattan, Councilmember Tim Lilligren says he won't vote for the city to subsidize the Manhattan Open now that the AVP can't • 'charge for admission. Yet he and three fel- low councilmembers have already voted for the public to subsidize it. In both cities, there has seldom been such a swift and relentless rebuke about. one issue. Manhattan's own Parks. and `' Recreation Commission told the voyncU t: a shouldn't allow the AVP to.ch" "aitrfre `;; commission was ignored by its gesture that infuriated several commis .sioners. Not because they were ignored — they are used to that — but due to the cav- alier attitude toward commercializing pub- lic land (three of these councilmembers are the same ones who were willing to re- move a basketball court and lease part of Marine Avenue Park to a commercial bat- ting cage venture, along with not putting such a project out to public bid). What can residents count on from their council if it repeatedly compromises pub- ic park land? For the time being, you have won this battle. Unfortunately, it will likely only ast the length of the current Coastal Commissioners' terms. • • Draw up reasonable rules for beach events perhaps Assemblywoman Debra Bowen, D -Torrance, summed up the plight of the Manhattan Open vol- leyball tournament best: "It's a first-rate mess. After negotiating with the city of Manhattan Beach to allow paid admission at the annual event, and then see- ing the plan thwarted by the state Coastal Commission, the Association of Volleyball Professionals decided to re- name this year's tournament and move it to Hermosa Beach. Also complicating the picture, the South Bay Coastal Defense Alliance secured a restraining order against the tournament, alleging that the AVP violated state envi- ronmental laws. We agree with Bowen, who said during a Daily Breeze Editorial Board meeting that the paid seating aspect of this controversy should not be the main stumbling. block.Rather, the Coastal Commission should develop broader criteria for holding such popular beach events. Beach cities and event sponsors need firm guidelines dealing with issues such as traffic, noise and beach ac- cess so they can do appropriate planning. Clearly, the an- swer is not for the full Coastal -Commission, whose makeup can change with the political winds, to pore over the details of each beach'everitthat•:is•proposed. .There -should, be reasonable guideiines dealing with en- vironmental issues and perhaps a numerical limit to the 1 numbenof major beach events held during tl a;summer. By giving. beach cities and event sponsors a clearer view of what is,acceptable at -the beach acid what is not; . officials in the future`should-beable to.avoid the legal sparring,that characterized this,year's Manhattan Open.. l :J Daily :Breeze Thomas J. Wafer Jr: Publisher. , • James M. Box 0; r Editor, .:Jean Adelsman , • Managing Editor ' Ronald D. Goble Production Manager • t41John T.' -Bennett Advertising Director..., DavldMM. Thorne ,Business Manager' 'Charles A. McManis Jr. Circulation Director - Michas Carroll Editorial Page. Editor, • 3h#9 _3-Z- 99 ; 1,6 la.410-4.s 63G relewts-uc.,4-ta;s4 (-2.Ltics :9ECFPIFD taafity z_11/1 ZgZi Ow‘lov p • MAR -3 1999 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE cure_ 4(.13o Ju al) kisktAes CnvIAALI JIMA. 6LL "kte_. (1731...1 fe7r4 sce_s z SigA2 NI<A 29?n 614109 pL. t&e.4z.L5c) tpire:cecs-f--3 Llockipi6? `I -LSE vehicles arAf-1- (kaki LAT& .01111)e.,r . 'tea. n4 -1A.81- kt_PEr,e snarce. 0G&M.va.-1-7A /14 k 0_1Pfl . f-eke,re. a sOrAiir* ng eAr‘ OAA.A. emit -30-/N (. avid L3/to p L ,Cpue. lDnoke.r pni c -e areck 040...tke LLY1A_ Amin c) .) t_e_y teao-e_Iaci hci.676,scu1o /Sciciict_ ciA.td cri-lt_ewN --krasCt Qv L Or-bP wrirt,c,-) _CAac4i p•antenci Loa 6v,u=f hael_ _ beiA; _crKAe.4- Swell° r • . _ 100 ce. is.Sties c4A ctioa aGet,Lain c2 • •g6-��tia-w� MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, February 23, 1999, at the hour of 7:16 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Chloe Edgerton ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Edgerton, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Benz Absent: None MAYOR'S COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Benz asked for a brief review of the newly submitted "Coastal Conservation Act" initiative. City Manager Stephen Burrell responded that there needed to be an analysis made of the potential impact as the initiative was lengthy. Community Resources Director Mary Rooney said that the initiative was six pages of small type and contained ambiguities, but it appeared to deal mainly with special events in the coastal zone, which extended beyond the beach east to Valley Drive, and could impact the majority of events and fund raising activities in the City. Ms. Rooney responded to Council questions and said that it appeared to be very similar to an initiative from Manhattan Beach. Action: To direct that the City Attorney Michael Jenkins review the proposed initiative and clarify the types of impacts this could have on the City and for staff to estimate the costs the initiative could impose upon the city and its citizens, in order to provide factual information to the public. Motion Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Joanne Edgerton - announced the Hermosa Beach Little League "Opening Night Ceremony" to be held on Friday, March 5, 1999, at 6:30 P.M. and invited everyone to attend. Mayor Benz agreed to throw out the first ball; and, Shirley Cassell - spoke regarding two Councilmembers not having their City -paid laptop computers at the meeting; questioned a check for over $6,000 for legal fees on the oil drilling project and asked for an accounting of the amount of City money spent for legal fees on the oil project to date and the amount expected to be spent in the future; asked that this report be available by the next meeting. COUNCIL COMMENTS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None 1111 City Council Minutes 02-23-99 Page 9912 • • CONSENT CALENDAR: Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (p), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (f) Oakes, (g) Bowler and (p) Edgerton. Item 1(k) was withdrawn by staff. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: (1) Minutes of the Special Meeting held on February 9, 1999; and, (2) Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on February 9, 1999. Action: To approve the minutes of the Special Meeting of February 9, 1999, and the Regular Meeting of February 9, 1999, as presented. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE CHECK REGISTER NOS. 16282 THROUGH 16398, NOTING VOID CHECK NO. 16375. Action: To ratify the check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE eu'iuRE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE JANUARY, 1999, FINANCIAL REPORTS: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the January, 1999, Financial Reports as presented. (e) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REVISED JPA AGREEMENT FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT AREA G FOR THE PROVISION OF DISASTER RELATED RESPONSE AND RECOVERY PROGRAMS. Memorandum from Fire Chief Pete Bonano dated January 26, 1999. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the revised JPA Agreement for Area G, for the provision of disaster related response and recovery programs. (f) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16, 1999. City Council Minutes 02-23-99 Page 9913 This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Oakes for separate discussion later in the meeting in order to reconsider, with Councilmember Bowler, the Planning Commission decision on their agenda item 12, 1301 Manhattan Avenue. City Manager Burrell said that the item would return to Council at the Regular Meeting of March 23, 1998. Action: To receive and file the balance of the action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of February 16, 1999. Motion Oakes, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. (g) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #24923 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 306 MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 10, 1999. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Bowler for separate discussion later in the meeting. Mr. Bowler said that this item had been pulled by mistake. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 99-5966, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #24923 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 306 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Motion Bowler, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote (h) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #24922 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 1716 MANHATTAN AVENUE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 10, 1999. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 99-5963, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #24922 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1716 MANHATTAN AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (i) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #24824 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 240 MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 10, 1999. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 99-5964, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE City Council Minutes 02-23-99 Page 9914 • • CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #24824 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 240 MONTEREY BOULEVARD, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (j) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP #25024 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 531 - 25TH STREET. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 10, 1999. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 99-5965, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #25024 FOR A TWO UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 531 25TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (k) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC FOR THE USE OF ROOMS 7 & 11 IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 11, 1999. Action: City Manager Burrell announced that this item had been, withdrawn by staff and would return at a future meeting. (1) RECOMMENDATION TO SET WORKSHOP DATES OF 'rtluitSDAY, MAY 20th AND ThuitSDAY, JUNE 3rd AT 7:10 P.M. FOR REVIEW OF THE 1999-00 BUDGET. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 17, 1999. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to set workshop dates of Thursday, May 20th and Thursday, June 3rd at 7:10 P.M. for review of the 1999-00 budget. Note: This item was discussed at the close of the meeting in order to direct staff to bring back an item changing the date of the workshop meetings to Mondays rather than Thursdays. (m) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 1, 1998. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of December 1, 1998. (n) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE TO RETAIN BFL/OWEN, INC., THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND PRINCIPAL ON THE GORDON CHONG AND PARTNERS DESIGN TEAM, FOR THE NORTH PIER PARKING STRUCTURE TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PARKING STRUCTURE IN THE AMOUNT OF City Council Minutes 02-23-99 Page 9915 $25,000. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated February 17, 1999. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1. Authorize to retain BFL/Owen, Inc., the Structural Engineer and principal on the Gordon Chong and Partners design team, for the North Pier Parking Structure to provide structural observation of the construction for the parking structure in the amount of $25,000; and 2. Authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to issue addenda as necessary within the budgeted limitation. (o) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT THE WORK BY GEOSCENE LANDSCAPE ON CIP 96-508 GREENBELT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO RELEASE THE 10% RETENTION, 35 DAYS FOLLOWING THE FILING OF THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated February 17, 1999. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1. Accept the work by Geoscene Landscape of Escondido on CIP Project No. 96-508, Greenbelt Improvement Project, as complete; and 2. Authorize staff to release the 109,5 retention, 35 days following the filing of the Certificate of Completion. And noting a final contract amount of $640,072.41. (p) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROPERTY PURCHASED BY THE CITY AT 1309 BARD STREET. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 18, 1999. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Edgerton for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Manager Burrell responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 99-5967, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PROPERTY AT 1309 BARD STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AND ORDERING ITS RECORDATION." Motion Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE DISCUSSION CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE Items 1(f) , (g) , and (p) were in order for clarity. heard at this time but are shown City Council Minutes 02-23-99 Page 9916 • • Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None MUNICIPAL MATTERS 4. REVIEW OF POLICY FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS. Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated February 16, 1999. Police Chief Straser presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Action: To: 1. direct staff to set a policy of marking the auto's tire only after the meter has expired thus allowing an additional two hours, up to a four hour limit, before a second ticket is issued; and, 2. review this policy after the parking structure is completed. Motion Oakes, second Edgerton. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Bowler and Reviczky. 5. BIJOU BUILDING - FOLLOW-UP ON APPROVAL OF SEISMIC RETROFIT PLANS AND REQUEST TO RECONSIDER FLOOR LEVELING. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 16, 1999. Councilmember Bowler declared a potential conflict of interest due to owning a business within the 300 -foot radius and left the dais and the room at 8:05 P.M. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 8:06 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council was: Jan Ostashay - PCR, City Consultant, responded to Council questions. Public participation closed at 8:17 P.M. Action: To allow the theatre floor to be made level rather than sloping. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Edgerton and the absence of Bowler. 5. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS STATEMENT AND PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP OFFICE/RETAIL PROJECT IN CONNECTION WITH DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated February 18, 1999. City Council Minutes 02-23-99 Page 9917 Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell said that the City would be proposing a ground lease. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the report stating that staff will prepare a draft copy of the RFP/RFQ and a list of preliminary development goals over the next month for City Council consideration. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 7. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. BEACH RESTORATION - AB64 (DUCHENY). Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 18, 1999. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To direct the City Manager to write a letter expressing the Council's support for AB64 that will set up a program of cost-effective beach restoration projects. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. b. SET SPECIAL MEETING FOR TUESDAY, MARCH 30, 1999 FOR REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 18, 1999. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: Mayor Benz directed, with the consensus of the Council, that the date of Tuesday, March 30, 1999, be set for a special meeting for a review of residential development standards. Mayor Benz announced that meetings on Thursdays were difficult for him to attend as he was usually out of the City and asked that consent item 1(1) be reconsidered. Action: Mayor Benz directed, with the consensus of the Council, that staff change the days of the budget workshops from Thursday to Monday and bring the item back to Council for approval. Councilmember Edgerton spoke on the proposed expansion of Los Angeles Airport (LAX) and asked for a report from the City Attorney. City Attorney Jenkins gave a brief review City Council Minutes 02-23-99 Page 9918 • • of actions to date and said that no EIR had been filed for the change of LAX flight patterns. Action: Mayor Benz directed, with the consensus of the Council, that Councilmember Edgerton accompany City Manager Burrell as the City's representative to a press conference in El Segundo on March 4, 1999, and to a lunch meeting on March 16, 1999, both to discuss opposition to LAX expansion plans. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. ENDORSEMENT OF SPECIAL OVERLAY CONCEPT FOR AREA .CODES. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated February 18, 1999. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions. Action: To direct the City Manager to write a letter expressing the Council's support for the special overlay concept for area codes. Motion Bowler, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 9. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None CITIZEN COMMENTS No one came forward to address the Council at this time. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, February 23, 1999, at the hour of 8:45 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, March 9, 1999, at the hour of 7:10 P.M. puty City erk City Council Minutes 02-23-99 Page 9919 • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 02/18/99 08:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS • 5/07 PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 16399 02/18/99 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 001-1103 283,183.19 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 105-1103 6,989.46 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 109-1103 922.13 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 110-1103 27,074.85 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 117-1103 622.14 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 126-1103 572.46 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 140-1103 301.20 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 145-1103 1,448.66 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 152-1103 80.92 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 160-1103 8,152.73 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 705-1103 2,374.26 PAYROLL/2-1 TO 2-15-99 715-1103 3,002.99 334,724.99 TOTAL CHECKS 334,724.99 ib' • • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 02/18/99 08:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 283,183.19 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 6,989.46 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 922.13 110 PARKING FUND 27,074.85 117 AB939 FUND 622.14 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 572.46 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 301.20 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1,448.66 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 80.92 160 SEWER FUND 8,152.73 705 INSURANCE FUND 2,374.26 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,002.99 TOTAL 334,724.99 2 A PAGE 2 • • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 02/18/99 17:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ---> VOID CHECKS CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS 016447 VOID 3 PAGE 1 VOUCHRE2 02/18/99 17:56 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • 16400 02/18/99 000029 A-1 COAST RENTALS 16401 02/18/99 008461 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 16402 02/18/99 006827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PORTABLE RESTROOMS/PIER CELL PHONE REPAIRS SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV 16403 02/18/99 006421 ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT ROPE RESCUE EQUIPMENT 16404 02/18/99 005628 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC MEMBERSHIP DUES/ROBERTSON 16405 02/18/99 005179 AT&T 16406 02/18/99 008630 AVIS 16407 02/18/99 009271 DR DEBRA J. BEACH 16408 02/18/99 009104 TRACY BLENDER 16409 02/18/99 008345 JOSH BOUMA 16410 02/18/99 008344 SHANE BOUMA 16411 02/18/99 003676 JEAN BRIAN 16412 02/18/99 009270 KIM BRIDGES 16413 02/18/99 009142 KIMBERLY A. BROWN LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/JAN 99 LONG DISTANCE CHRGS/JAN 99 CITATION REFUND CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/WINTER 99 ROLLER HOCKEY REFEREE/WINTER ROLLER HOCKEY REFEREE 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE TUITION REIMBURSEMENT ROLLER HOCKEY SCOREKEEPER 16414 02/18/99 002076 BROWNING FERRIS COMPANY REFUSE LIEN FEES COLLECTED REFUSE LIEN FEES COLLECTED 16415 02/18/99 007109 ADAM BURT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/WINTER 99 16416 02/18/99 008436 EDGAR CALDERON TECH WORK/COMMUNITY CENTER 16417 02/18/99 009167 CALIF STATE SHERIFF'S A CLASS FEES/LT. WRIGHT 16418 02/18/99 007458 CALIF. PUBLIC PARKING A MEMBERSHIP DUES/HALL 16419 02/18/99 009269 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COAL MEMBERSHIP 16420 02/18/99 000262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVI STAMPS & STAMP PADS 16421 02/18/99 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT STREET SWEEPING/JAN 99 DOWNTOWN LOT CLEANING 16422 02/18/99 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC WATER BILLING/FEB 99 16423 02/18/99 009280 STEVE CHARNEY CITATION REFUND L1 ACCOUNT NUMBER 160-3102-4201 001-4202-4305 001-2102-4201 180-2202-5401 001-4101-4315 001-2101-4304 001-2101-4304 110-3302 110-3302 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4201 001-4601-4201 105-3105 001-2201-4317 001-4601-4201 001-1230 001-3902 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4201 001-2101-4313 110-1204-4315 001-1201-4315 001-2101-4305 001-3104-4201 109-3301-4201 105-2601-4303 110-3302 ITEM AMOUNT 1,504.68 50.00 2,650.50 218.23 313.00 8.36 8.36 20.00 40.00 182.00 102.00 18.00 24.61 120.00 84.00 1,592.07 686.08- 207.20 20.00 216.44 75.00 500.00 87.96 12,200.00 5,700.00 94.93 52.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 1,504.68 50.00 2,650.50 218.23 313.00 16.72 20.00 40.00 182.00 102.00 18.00 24.61 120.00 84.00 905.99 207.20 20.00 216.44 75.00 500.00 87.96 17,900.00 94.93 52.00 VOUCHRE2 02/18/99 17:56 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • 16424 02/18/99 000153 CINTAS CORPORATION 16425 02/18/99 008811 DIANE CLEARY 16426 02/18/99 005970 DENNIS COLLINS 16427 02/18/99 000041 VIKI COPELAND 16428 02/18/99 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS 16429 02/18/99 008359 DARE AMERICA MERCHANDIS 16430 02/18/99 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. 16431 02/18/99 000147 THE DEVELOPMENT 16432 02/18/99 16433 02/18/99 16434 02/18/99 16435 02/18/99 16436 02/18/99 007569 DINN BROS. TROPHIES 009159 THE DUMBELL MAN 000122 DUNCAN INDUSTRIES 000704 THE ECONOMICS PRESS 006974 EMBASSY SUITES 16437 02/18/99 007853 EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING & 16438 02/18/99 007456 VICKEN EMURIAN 16439 02/18/99 003169 STEVE FILLMAN 16440 02/18/99 008422 FIRE INFORMATION SUPPOR 16441 02/18/99 008175 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES 16442 02/18/99 008931 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES,TR 16443 02/18/99 008717 GFOA CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIFORM SERVICES/JAN 99 UNIFORM SERVICES/JAN 99 UNIFORM SERVICES/JAN 99 UNIFORM SERVICES/JAN 99 UNIFORM SERVICES/JAN 99 UNIFORM SERVICES/JAN 99 UNIFORM SERVICE/FEB 99 UNIFORM SERVICE/FEB 99 MINUTES & TRANSCRIPTION SERV. INSTRUCTORS PAYMENT/WINTER 99 REIMBURSEMENT/MEALS/CMTA OFFICE SUPPLIES/DEC 98 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JAN 99 OFFICE SUPPLIES CREDIT RETURNED MERCHANDISE EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/DEC 98 FILM DEVELOPING/JAN 99 FILM PROCESSING/JAN 99 ROLLER HOCKEY LEAGUE AWARDS REMOVAL/OLD BASKETBALL EQUIP PARKING METER PARTS SUBSCRIPTION/MANAGEMENT MEMOS LOGING/JOHNSON/CAPE CONFERENCE SEWER MAINT CONTRACT/1/99 ROLLER HOCKEY REFEREE/98/99 INSTRUCTOR/WINTER 99 SUNPRO UPGRADE/QRT REPORTING LIABILITY TRUST ACCOUNT/JAN 99 WORKER COMP CLAIMS/2/1-2/11/99 GAAFR UPDATE SUPPLEMENT 5 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4202-4187 110-3302-4187 001-4101-4201 001-4601-4221 001-1202-4317 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-2101-4305 110-1204-4201 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4305 001-4601-4308 125-8506-4309 110-3302-4309 001-1202-4317 001-2101-4317 160-3102-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4201 705-1209-4324 705-1217-4324 001-1202-4317 ITEM AMOUNT 90.66 5.00 90.66 5.00 90.66 5.00 95.21 5.00 242.25 189.00 101.26 151.59 203.67 9.10 9.10- 90.34 143.78 54.13 45.62 614.74 160.00 972.68 46.54 398.72 10,685.16 30.00 546.00 707.64 1,656.00 30,190.12 25.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 387.19 242.25 189.00 101.26 355.26 90.34 143.78 99.75 614.74 160.00 972.68 46.54 398.72 10,685.16 30.00 546.00 707.64 1,656.00 30,190.12 25.00 VOUCHRE2 02/18/99 17:56 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 16444 02/18/99 009279 GONDOLLA GETAWAYS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DEPOSIT EXCURSION /3/26/99 16445 02/18/99 001278 CHARLES & JOANNE GOTTES 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE 16446 02/18/99 16448 02/18/99 16449 02/18/99 16450 02/18/99 16451 02/18/99 16452 02/18/99 16453 02/18/99 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO 009098 HAWKEN MACHINE & TOOL C 008576 HEC RAMSEY ENTERPRISES 000451 HERMOSA BCH FIREFIGHTER 003131 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS 005356 JOHN HUNTER & ASSOC. 009284 STEWARD SPRINKLERS JACK 16454 02/18/99 007880 JAMESTOWN PRESS 16455 02/18/99 000444 TEREA JOHNSON PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 PHONE BILLING OCT 98 WINDMILL PARTS PURCHASED BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL FORMS WINTER CPR CLASS 1ST GRT SALES TAX SERVICES ADMIN OF STORM WATER PROGRAM BACKFLOW DEVICES REPAIRED BACKFLOW DEVICES REPAIRED BUSINESS LICENSE FORMS PRINTED BUSINESS CARDS/BENZ BUSINESS CARD MASTERS/JAN 99 BUSINESS CARDS/KIM PER DIEM/CRIME SCENE INVEST 16456 02/18/99 009277 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTE SEMINAR/FLAHERTY 16457 02/18/99 008675 NOLAN KIM 16458 02/18/99 006293 KINKO'S INC. 16459 02/18/99 008617 ROSE KIRK ROLLER HOCKEY REFEREE/98/99 PRINTING SERVICES/JAN 99 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4601-4201 105-3105 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 001-2125 110-1204-4305 001-4601-4221 001-1202-4201 160-3102-4201 001-4202-4201 105-2601-4201 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-4601-4305 001-2101-4317 001-4202-4317 001-4601-4201 160-3102-4396 105-3105 ITEM AMOUNT 352.50 24.61 12.06 25.63 13.57 12.06 25.63 25.63 76.90 39.20 39.20 13.57 606.12 90.47 90.47 88.96 76.90 76.90 155.30 39.20 200.00 136.69 30.00 900.30 1,759.00 308.38 308.37 616.75 309.60 32.48 737.18 32.48 1,111.74 200.00 200.00 449.00 449.00 10.00 10.00 43.08 43.08 24.61 24.61 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 352.50 24.61 1,507.77 200.00 136.69 30.00 900.30 1,759.00 VOUCHRE2 02/18/99 17:56 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 5 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 16460 02/18/99 007136 THE LAKES AT EL SEGUNDO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/GOLF 001-4601-4221 273.00 273.00 16461 02/18/99 009187 LASALLE NATIONAL BANK LOWER PIER ASSESSMENT BOND 610-2252 33,005.56 33,005.56 16462 02/18/99 009283 NICOLETTE LAWRENCE CITATION REFUND 110-3302 5.00 5.00 16463 02/18/99 009281 MILES LAWSON CITATION REFUND 110-3302 20.00 20.00 16464 02/18/99 008343 BRYANT LE ROLLER HOCKEY REFEREE/WINTER 001-4601-4201 130.00 130.00 16465 02/18/99 000167 LEARNED LUMBER SAW BLADE PURCHASE/FEB 99 001-2201-4309 29.36 29.36 16466 02/18/99 002175 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIE DECEMBER LEGAL FEES 001-1203-4201 95.00 95.00 16467 02/18/99 008445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPI MEDICAL TEST 001-1203-4320 45.00 45.00 16468 02/18/99 009267 LOS ANGELES BUSSINESS J SUBSCRIPTION 001-2101-4306 89.95 89.95 16469 02/18/99 003628 DIANNE LOUGHIN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 001-2101-4317 51.22 51.22 16470 02/18/99 000605 MANHATTAN FORD SEWER TRUCK REPAIRS/JAN 99 715-3102-4311 232.14 232.14 16471 02/18/99 007060 AARON MARKS TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 001-2201-4317 120.00 120.00 16472 02/18/99 003731 BETTY MARTIN 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE 105-3105 24.61 24.61 16473 02/18/99 003183 MARX BROTHERS SEMI ANNUAL SERVICE & MAINT 001-4204-4201 100.00 100.00 16474 02/18/99 004138 KENNETH A. MEERSAND LEGAL SERVICES/JAN 99 001-1132-4201 6,040.00 6,040.00 16475 02/18/99 009272 MIKE HOLT ENTERPRISES, PUBLICATIONS 001-4201-4315 102.00 102.00 16476 02/18/99 008457 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM COPIER USAGE/JAN 99 001-1208-4201 130.90 COPIER USAGE/JAN 99 001-4601-4201 44.63 COPIER USAGE/JAN 99 001-1208-4201 68.43 COPIER USAGE/JAN 99 001-2201-4201 44.63 COPIER USAGE/JAN 99 110-3302-4201 8.91 297.50 16477 02/18/99 008975 MOBIL FLEET GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 715-2101-4310 1,910.49 GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 715-4201-4310 51.84 GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 715-4202-4310 215.06 GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 715-3302-4310 310.72 GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 715-3104-4310 75.87 GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 715-4601-4310 15.71 GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 715-2601-4310 121.33 GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 715-3102-4310 64.82 GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 715-4204-4310 46.35 GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 715-1236 129.49 GAS CARD PURCHASE/JAN 99 001-1250 56.70 2,998.38 16478 02/18/99 009276 OLIVIA MORENO CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING 110-3302 20.00 20.00 VOUCHRE2 02/18/99 17:56 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME 16479 02/18/99 009274 ELIZABETH MYERS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CITATION REFUND 16480 02/18/99 002490 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO NFPA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 16481 02/18/99 008090 NIEVES AND ASSOCIATES 16482 02/18/99 000093 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 16483 02/18/99 007541 LOUISE PALERMO 16484 02/18/99 003820 POSTMASTER 16485 02/18/99 000296 THE PRINT NETWORK 300' NOTICING/FEB 99 REPLACE WINDSHIELD INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/WINTER 99 PERMIT 460 SHUTTLE FLYERS COPIED ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-3302 001-4201-4315 001-4101-4201 715-2101-4311 001-4601-4221 110-1204-4305 145-3401-4251 16486 02/18/99 008914 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS CO HOT COAL CONTAINERS/VALLEY PRK 125-8506-4309 16487 02/18/99 006953 DORIS RADO 16488 02/18/99 009190 REDONDO VACUUM 16489 02/18/99 003991 BARRY REED 16490 02/18/99 009226 RODGERS & MCDONALD 16491 02/18/99 009282 VICTOR H. RODRIGUEZ 16492 02/18/99 008240 MARGARITA ROLLOW 16493 02/18/99 002500 S & J SALES 16494 02/18/99 009139 SECURED STORAGE 16495 02/18/99 009268 SIGNS 4 SUCCESS 16496 02/18/99 009278 SIMON & SCHUSTER 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE VACUUM INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/WINTER 99 SPRING BROCHURE PRINTING CITATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/WINTER 99 BATTERIES FOR UPS SYSTEM STORAGE CHARGES/1ST QRT 1999 MAGNETIC SIGNS/SHUTTLE PUBLICATION 16497 02/18/99 000118 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COU CITATION SURCHARGE/SEPT 98 CITATION SURCHARGE/OCT 98 CITATION SURCHARGE/NOV 98 CITATION SURCHARGE/DEC 98 16498 02/18/99 000018 SOUTH BAY WELDERS WELDING SUPPLIES 16499 02/18/99 000159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI STREET LIGHTING/FEB 99 STREET LIGHTING/FEB 99 STREET LIGHTING/FEB 99 ELECTRIC BILLING/FEB 99 16500 02/18/99 000364 STATE OF CALIFORNIA FINGERPRINT SERVICES/JAN 99 16501 02/18/99 009153 TOSCO FLEET SERVICES GAS PURCHASES/JAN 99 8 105-3105 001-2201-4305 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4302 110-3302 001-4601-4221 170-2103-5402 001-1121-4201 145-3401-4201 001-4601-4305 110-3302 110-3302 110-3302 110-3302 715-4206-4309 105-2601-4303 105-2601-4303 105-2601-4303 105-2601-4303 001-2101-4251 715-2101-4310 PAGE 6 ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 8.00 8.00 115.00 115.00 1,960.00 1,960.00 281.02 281.02 1,484.00 1,484.00 100.00 100.00 267.92 267.92 818.37 818.37 49.22 49.22 432.95 432.95 2,100.00 2,100.00 3,520.00 3,520.00 5.00 5.00 420.00 420.00 2,510.63 2,510.63 24.00 24.00 242.48 242.48 61.85 61.85 27,557.00 21,363.00 21,011.00 17,640.00 87,571.00 49.00 49.00 8,708.75 137.30 33.05 150.54 9,029.64 630.00 630.00 20.08 VOUCHRE2 02/18/99 17:56 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION GAS PURCHASES/JAN 99 GAS PURCHASES/JAN 99 FUEL DISCOUNT RECEIVABLE/1/99 16502 02/18/99 000870 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE MEMBERSHIP DUES/BLUMENFELD 16503 02/18/99 009078 VAN HERRICK'S 16504 02/18/99 003353 VISA 16505 02/18/99 009275 JAMES D. WARDWELL 16506 02/18/99 004268 TRACY YATES LANDSCAPE MAINT/JAN 99 TREE TRIMMING/JAN 99 ORAL BOARD LUNCHES/JAN 99 CITATION REFUND TUITION REIMBURSEMENT TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-2201-4310 715-2601-4310 715-1236 001-4101-4315 001-4202-4201 105-2601-4201 001-1203-4201 110-3302 001-4601-4317 ITEM AMOUNT 326.97 27.06 28.18 160.00 11,825.00 900.00 151.78 8.00 677.36 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 402.29 160.00 12,725.00 151.78 8.00 677.36 249,893.97 VOUCHRE2 02/18/99 17:56 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 57,360.52 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 10,480.60 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 5,700.00 110 PARKING FUND 89,385.49 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 978.37 145 PROPOSITION ,A FUND 510.40 160 SEWER FUND 13,991.92 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 2,510.63 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 218.23 610 LWR PIER DIST REDEMPTION FUND 33,005.56 705 INSURANCE FUND 31,846.12 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 3,906.13 TOTAL 249,893.97 10 PAGE 8 VOUCHRE2 02/25/99 17:15 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 16507 02/25/99 009295 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP EMERGENCY REPAIR WORK 16508 02/25/99 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 16509 02/25/99 009287 ALDO & NIKKI'S 16510 02/25/99 007018 ILENE ATKINSON 16511 02/25/99 000252 BEACH TRAVEL 16512 02/25/99 003136 ROBERT BENZ 16513 02/25/99 006329 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR 16514 02/25/99 004540 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTE 16515 02/25/99 009085 BLACKMORE MASTER DISTRI 16516 02/25/99 006322 PETE BONANO 16517 02/25/99 008585 AARON BUSH 16518 02/25/99 000598 CA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS 16519 02/25/99 000261 CA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOC 16520 02/25/99 009291 CALIF DISTRICT ATTORNEY 16521 02/25/99 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC 16522 02/25/99 006914 SHIRLEY CASSELL 16523 02/25/99 009289 CANYON CEMAN MAINT AGREEMENT/FEB 99 EXCURSION DEPOSIT 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE AIRFARE/BONANO PER DIEM/NLC CONFERENCE ENGINEERING CONTRACT MYRTLE ENGINEERING CONTRACT LOMA DR ANNUAL STATE FEE/MEDICAL WASTE PRISONER MEALS/FEB 99 PER DIEM/CA FIRE ACADEMY TUITION REIMBURSEMENT ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES TUITION/ECKERT 1999 MEMBERSHIP DUES/MEERSAND WATER BILLING/CLOSING BILL WATER BILLING/CLOSING BILL WATER BILLING/CLOSING BILL WATER BILLING/CLOSING BILL WATER BILLING/FEB 99 WATER BILLING/FEB 99 WATER BILLING/FEB 99 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE CITATION REFUND 16524 02/25/99 009224 JAMES CHRISTOPHER CONST SIDEWALK & GUTTER 16525 02/25/99 009265 DOUG CLAYTON 16526 02/25/99 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS RENTAL DEPOST REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES/FEB 99 OFFICE SUPPLIES/FEB 99 CREDIT RETURNED MERCHANDISE 16527 02/25/99 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/FEB 98 ACCOUNT NUMBER 180-2202-4201 110-3302-4201 001-4601-4201 105-3105 001-2201-4317 001-1101-4317 306-8182-4201 306-8183-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4306 001-2201-4317 001-2201-4317 001-1141-4315 001-1202-4315 001-2101-4312 001-1132-4315 001-4204-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4202-4303 105-2601-4303 001-4202-4303 001-4204-4303 105-3105 110-3302 001-3104-4201 001-2111 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 110-1204-4201 ITEM AMOUNT PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 207.45 207.45 352.50 352.50 500.00 500.00 24.61 24.61 138.00 138.00 200.00 200.00 262.50 262.50 525.00 25.00 25.00 101.04 101.04 300.00 300.00 120.00 120.00 125.00 77.00 100.00 100.00 25.00 77.00 100.00 30.48 30.48 26.07 19.01 910.33 1,710.90 454.77 24.61 50.00 800.00 100.00 426.78 13.88 13.88- 79.73 3,182.04 24.61 50.00 800.00 100.00 426.78 VOUCHRE2 02/25/99 17:15 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 1 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/FEB 99 DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/FEB 99 16528 02/25/99 000154 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CA SHELTER SERVICES/JAN 99 16529 02/25/99 002855 DICTAPHONE, INC. 16530 02/25/99 006514 DMG-MAXIMUS 16531 02/25/99 009112 DMR TEAM 16532 02/25/99 006178 DOMINO COMPUTER CENTER 16533 02/25/99 000830 EQUITABLE LIFE OF IOWA 16534 02/25/99 009292 CINDY FISCHER 16535 02/25/99 008175 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES 16536 02/25/99 008404 SUZANNE GARNIER 16537 02/25/99 007115 GILLIS & ASSOCIATES ARC 16538 02/25/99 007270 GREEN MEADOWS FARM 16539 02/25/99 000015 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPO DATA TAPES STATE MANDATED COST MONTEREY DESIGN CONTRACT MONTEREY DESIGN.. CONTRACT 3COMPUTERS PURCHASED ANNUAL PREMIUM/E. DILLER ROLLER HOCKEY REFUND ROLLER HOCKEY REFUND LIABILITY JUDGEMENT CLASS REFUND ARCHITECT SERVICES/JAN 99 EXCURSION/SPRING CAMP/4/7/99 FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX CHARGES/DEC 98 CHARGES DEC 98 CHARGES/DEC 98 CHARGES/DEC 98 CHARGES/DEC 98 BILLING/JAN 99 BILLING/JAN 99 BILLING/JAN 99 BILLING/JAN 99 16540 02/25/99 000567 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATI 1999 ANNUAL DUES/STRASER 16541 02/25/99 002137 DET. LANCE JAAKOLA 16542 02/25/99 005604 STEVE KINGDON MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT/POST RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 16543 02/25/99 007859 L.A. CO METRO TRANS AUT BUS PASS SALES/FEB 99 16544 02/25/99 000167 LEARNED LUMBER 16545 02/25/99 007079 EDNA LEHMAN 16546 02/25/99 007236 LITTLE CO. OF MARY SILICA SAND/WINDMILL PROJECT 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE BLS INSTRUCTORS CARD RENEWALS ACCOUNT NUMBER 110-1204-4201 110-1204-4201 110-3302-4251 001-2101-4309 001-1202-4201 160-8142-4201 301-8142-4201 001-1206-5402 001-1203-4188 001-2111 001-2111 705-1209-4324 001-2111 127-8622-4201 001-4601-4201 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-4202-4304 001-1101-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 001-2101-4317 001-2101-4312 001-2111 145-3403-4251 001-2125 105-3105 001-2201-4317 ITEM AMOUNT 74.90 46.06 57.36 210.96 2,900.00 1,672.68 478.82 3,971.69 4,159.00 65.00 65.00 33,523.00 40.00 3,195.00 30.00 9.80 .58 19.03 4.17 .75 16.42 5.98 5.10 5.10 100.00 294.84 100.00 240.00 17.63 24.61 100.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 200.69 57.36 210.96 2,900.00 2,151.50 3,971.69 4,159.00 130.00 33,523.00 40.00 3,195.00 30.00 66.93 100.00 294.84 100.00 240.00 17.63 24.61 100.00 VOUCHRE2 02/25/99 17:15 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME 16547 02/25/99 006752 CARRIE LITTLE 16548 02/25/99 008431 MICHELE LUBY 16549 02/25/99 004611 GREGORY LUTZ • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CLASS REFUND/WINTER 98 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT WORK GUARANTEE DEPOSIT REFUND 16550 02/25/99 000183 CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH MEDIAN MAINT/ARTESIA 5/22-1/21 16551 02/25/99 009286 JOHN MC INTIRE 16552 02/25/99 009131 DENNIS MCCAMANT 16553 02/25/99 009161 JOHN MEEK CO.,INC 16554 02/25/99 009288 EVELYN NIES 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE ADVANCED DISABILITY/FEB 99 PIER RENOVATION CONTRACT PIER RENOVATION FEMA GRANT 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE 16555 02/25/99 009182 NORTH STAR GRAPHICS GRAPHIC SET UP/PATROL CARS GRAPHIC SET UPS/PATROL CARS 16556 02/25/99 005549 JULIA A. OAKES PER DIEM/LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMM 16557 02/25/99 002487 PAGING NETWORK OF ORANG PAGER BILLING/JAN 99 PAGER BILLING/JAN 99 PAGER BILLING/JAN 99 PAGER BILLING/JAN 99 PAGER BILLING/JAN 99 . PAGER BILLING/JAN 99 16558 02/25/99 000519 PAK WEST 16559 02/25/99 009293 DON PETRONI 16560 02/25/99 003820 POSTMASTER TRASH CAN LINERS DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND GYM FEE REFUND BULK MAIL PERMIT #52 16561 02/25/99 002190 PRECISION DYNAMICS CORP PROGRAM SUPPLIES/SPRING CAMP 16562 02/25/99 008482 PRO MEDIX MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 16563 02/25/99 003282 CITY OF REDONDO BEACH TRANSPORTATION/SPRING CAMP 99 16564 02/25/99 007921 JOHN L. RICHARDS 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE 16565 02/25/99 005379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS LEGAL SERVICES/DEC 98 LEGAL SERVICES/DEC 98 LEGAL BILLING/DEC 98 LEGAL SERVICES/DEC 98 LEGAL SERVICES/DEC 98 16566 02/25/99 006630 OSCAR RIVERA DEPOSIT REFUND 13 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2111 001-2101-4315 001-2110 105-2601-4201 105-3105 001-2201-4180 121-8620-4201 150-8620-4201 105-3105 715-2101-5403 715-2101-5403 001-1101-4317 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-1201-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 001-1206-4201 105-2601-4309 001-2111 001-2111 001-4601-4305 001-4601-4308 001-2201-4309 145-3409-4201 105-3105 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-2111 ITEM AMOUNT 40.00 356.48 1,600.00 687.17 24.61 2,853.00 139,473.82 54,392.73 24.61 990.64 925.64 150.00 70.81 2.25 2.25 13.50 45.00 2.25 213.56 100.00 60.00 100.00 84.98 275.84 75.00 24.61 1,092.60 1,451.80 108.60 67.50 2,591.04 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 40.00 356.48 1,600.00 687.17 24.61 2,853.00 193,866.55 24.61 1,916.28 150.00 136.06 213.56 160.00 100.00 84.98 275.84 75.00 24.61 5,311.54 100.00 100.00 VOUCHRE2 02/25/99 17:15 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 16567 02/25/99 000839 SUSAN SAXE-CLIFFORD PH PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAM/RESERVE 16568 02/25/99 006397 SCANTRONICS MICROFILM S MICROFICHE SERVICES 16569 02/25/99 009264 JAIME SHAW RENTAL REFUND 16570 02/25/99 008068 SMEAL FIRE APPARATUS CO PARTS FOR FIRE TRUCK 16571 02/25/99 000341 SOUTH BAY CITIES ASSOC! ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES/BONANO 16572 02/25/99 005136 SOUTHERN CAL SHARPSHOOT UNIFORM GEAR/LIPSON 16573 02/25/99 000170 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS OAS BILLING/FEB 99 GAS BILLING/FEB 99 GAS BILLING/FEB 99 16574 02/25/99 000146 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WAT DRINKING WATER/JAN 98 16575 02/25/99 001091 STEWART JACKSON SPRINKL BACKFLOW DEVICES REPAIRED BACKFLOW DEVICES REPAIRED 16576 02/25/99 009294 ROBERT THEGZE GYM FEE REFUND 16577 02/25/99 007864 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNI SAFEKEEPING FEES/JAN 99 16578 02/25/99 003353 VISA 16579 02/25/99 007737 ROBERT J. WICKWIRE 16580 02/25/99 008583 HAROLD C WILLIAMS COPIES MADE/ PIERPROJECT LGC CONFERENCE/OAKES MEETING/BURRELL HOTEL/BURRELL/LEAGUE OF CITIES LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMM/OAKS 1998 ASSESSMENT REBATE PER DIEM/LEAGUE OF CA CITIES TRAVEL EXPENSES 16581 02/25/99 005758 WILSON & ASSOCIATES POLYGRAPH EXAMINATIONS/POLICE 16582 02/25/99 008524 RICK WOOD GYM FEE REFUND 16583 02/25/99 005125 JOHN WORKMAN, PETTY CAS PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 iy ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1203-4201 001-4201-4201 001-2111 715-2201-4311 001-2201-4315 001-2101-4187 001-4204-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4204-4303 001-4601-4305 001-4202-4201 105-2601-4201 001-2111 001-1141-4305 001-1101-4305 001-1101-4317 001-1101-4317 001-1201-4317 001-1101-4317 105-3105 001-4202-4317 001-4202-4317 001-2101-4201 001-2111 001-4202-4317 001-1121-4317 001-1121-4305 001-4204-4309 001-4601-4315 001-4202-4305 001-1202-4317 001-4202-4102 001-2101-4305 001-2101-4317 001-2201-4305 ITEM AMOUNT 325.00 277.88 100.00 33.98 200.00 206.70 89.71 169.23 20.67 17.00 308.38 308.37 120.00 208.33 397.71 264.28 55.50 293.00 380.00 24.61 150.00 133.00 150.00 60.00 60.00 36.50 9.74 26.79 10.00 1.98 3.25 3.50 29.20 35.45 2.93 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 325.00 277.88 100.00 33.98 200.00 206.70 279.61 17.00 616.75 120.00 208.33 1,390.49 24.61 283.00 150.00 60.00 VOUCHRE2 02/25/99 17:15 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 PETTY CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 PETTY CASH REIMBURS/1/28-2/17 16584 02/25/99 007106 JENNIFER YAMANE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/FALL/WINTER ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4187 001-2201-4187 001-2101-4309 001-4601-4221 ITEM AMOUNT 28.55 19.38 13.41 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 280.68 1,120.00 1,120.00 TOTAL CHECKS 272,586.56 %5 • • VOUCHRE2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 02/25/99 17:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 33,900.55 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 2,291.70 110 PARKING FUND 660.55 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 139,473.82 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 3,195.00 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 315.00 150 GRANTS FUND 54,392.73 160 SEWER FUND 1,672.68 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 207.45 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 478.82 306 LOMA/MYRTLE UNDRGRND DISTRICT 525.00 705 INSURANCE FUND 33,523.00 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,950.26 TOTAL 272,586.56 Rp PAGE 6 VOUCHRE2 02/25/99 17:15 • • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY TVAT THEE MANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED 9N PAGES / TO INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER FOR .2/%p/ ► a7 /qJ ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE PAGE 7 • March 2, 1999 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council March 9, 1999 CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the checks listed below: #16131 - 01/14/99 - $ 345.00 League of California Cities. Registration was paid via credit card. Check was never mailed. #16571 — 02/25/99 $ 200.00 South Bay Cities Association. Processed to the wrong vendor. Check was never mailed. Concur: Stephen R. 4c%0bn M. Workman, City Treasurer Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director • March 4, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS I 8th Street Traffic Issues (Petition from Residents) Public Works City Hall renovation plans Fire Chief Assumption Inspection Authority for Mobilehome Parks City Manager Recommendation to set date for discussion of making Valley Drive two-way between 2°d Street and Herondo City Manager Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of March 16, 1999 Monthly Activity Reports for February, 1999 Community Development Director All Departments ................................. SPECIAL MEETING: REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS '. 199 ........................................................................................................................................................ . Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of March 2, 1999 Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of April 6, 1999 Community Resources Director Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of April 20, 1999 Monthly Activity Reports for March, 1999 Community Development Director All Departments lc • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council • 4 -/a76 -('LL) fi9' February 24, 1999 Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999 WORKSHOP DATES FOR REVIEW OF THE 1999-00 BUDGET Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the workshop dates for review of the 1999-00 Budget. The proposed dates are Monday, May 24th and Monday, June 7th at 7:10 P.M. (refer to attached calendars). Background On February 23rd, it was recommended that the workshops be scheduled for May 20th and June 3rd; however, not all Council members could attend on these dates. Analysis The proposed dates still allow time between workshops or Council meetings to prepare answers to any questions from the workshops. Budget adoption is scheduled for June 22, 1999, but could still occur on June 8th if only one workshop is needed. Respectfully submitted, Co cur: Viki Copeland Finance Director ALI Ste•1'i� n urrell City Manager ld F\1395\budget\buddatesl .doc • • Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Adk • February 22, 1999 • Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular meeting of The Hermosa Beach City Council March 9, 1999 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE OF FUNDS AVAILABLE UNDER THE JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG) TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Authorize the decline of funds directly made available through the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant (JAIBG) program administered by the Office of Criminal Justice Planning to the County of Los Angeles. The amount of funds is $7245.00. 2. Waive the City's right to its entire direct sub -grant award and authorize the funds to be expended by the County of Los Angeles for the purposes of hiring a deputy District Attorney for the vertical prosecution of juvenile offenders in Inglewood Juvenile Court. BACKGROUND Each year the Office of Criminal Justice Planning of the State of California makes available grant monies to cities and counties in the State for the purposes of developing programs to reduce and combat juvenile crime. This particular grant has designated grant amounts to individual cities and counties that can be applied for if an acceptable proposal is submitted. The City of Hermosa Beach has funds allocated in the amount of $7245. The District Attorney's Office of the County of Los Angeles has approached many of the South Bay Cities with the proposal of pooling these grant funds for the purpose of funding the assignment of an additional district attorney to the juvenile office at the Inglewood Courts Building. This district attorney would be utilized to conduct vertical prosecution cases against juvenile offenders. A vertical prosecution attorney not only reviews and files the case but will then handle the case through the court process from start to finish. This attorney will also be available to work with local schools in preventing juvenile delinquency. The other South Bay Cities that are considering participation in the program are El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Torrance, Hawthorne and Gardena. In order to release these funds to the County for their use the Office of Criminal Justice Planning requires each participating City must approve a resolution to release these funds. FISCAL IMPACT This resolution has no fiscal impact. Respectfully submitted, VAL STRASER, CHIEF OF POLICE HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Concur: ST ;� 1 r : T7'i LL CITY MANAGER Fiscal Impact: ofi nViki Cope ad Finance Director ctor RESOLUTION NO. 99 -59 -- A 9 -59--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE OF FUNDS AVAILABLE UNDER THE JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG) TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES WHEREAS the City of Hermosa Beach declines to directly accept funds made available through the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant (JAIBG) Program administered by the Office of Criminal Justice Planning (hereafter referred to as OCJP). NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach waives its right to its entire direct sub -grant award and authorizes the funds to be expended by the County of Los Angeles for the purpose of hiring a Deputy District Attorney for the vertical prosecution of juvenile offenders in the Inglewood Juvenile Court. This will be accomplished through the Community Law Enforcement and Recovery Program (CLEAR). IT IS AGREED that any liability arising out of the performance of this Grant Award Agreement, including civil court actions for damages, shall be the responsibility of the grant recipient and the authorizing agency. The State of California and OCJP disclaim responsibility for any such liability. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by this body. -1- PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of March, 1999. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -2- t. • • -g 7/ff March 1, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 9, 1999 AMEND EXISTING JANITORIAL SERVICE AGREEMENT TO INCLUDE MID-DAY SERVICE AND SEVEN-DAY SERVICE AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AND JAIL AREAS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to amend the existing Janitorial Service Agreement as approved at the Mid -Year Budget Review. Background: The Community Center, Clark Building and jail area ongoing programs have increased to warrant the seven (7) day -a -week services. The daytime service is much needed at The Community Center. Analysis: The cleanliness of the most used public facilities has suffered without a consistent maintenance routine. This additional work would reduce the complaints. Fiscal Impact: The monthly increase will be $1,870 per month. The current monthly billing is $5,380 per month, bringing the total monthly costs to $7,250 per month. At the Mid -Year Budget Review, Council approved a $12,000 increase to the existing FY 1998/99 Budget of $71,016. Attachment: Price quote letter from Executive -Suite, dated 2/24/99 Respectfully submitted, Concur: Michael Flaherty Public Works Superintendent Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director --*?,#-eee-e• )13eg. 4v /se_ Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Stephe�.. Burrell City . nager BC/F/B95/pwiiles/ccitems/MFJANITORIAL. doc 1f DIVISIO� • MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES • REAL ESTATE SERVICES • INSURANCE SERVICES • PURCHASING & SALES SERVICES • LEASING & RENTAL SERVICES • CREATIVE LABOR SERVICES oreeee,&te-Cleede Cleleeee CA4 19025 PARTHENIA STREET, SUITE 200 NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 3793 (818) 993 6300 Mr. Mike Flaherty, Public Works Superintendent CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3884 Fax Number (310) 798-2917 24 February 1999 Dear Mike: Per your request, Executive -Suite Services, Inc. is pleased to quote you our price for the four additional janitorial services for the Community Center, the Police/Jail Facility, and for the Clark Building. I have also included the existing schedule and the new schedule of cleaning for each facility. 1. One additional day of janitorial services at the Community Center for a total of seven (7) times per week $ 325.00 additional per month. 2. A four (4) hour day worker at the Community Center, sevenp(7)mtimes pper week 3. One additional day of janitorial services at the Police/Jail Facility for a total of seven (7) times per week. rhis item is not A. Policc/Jail Arca $ 290•.90 erddi,tional recommended. B , perl month. $ 125.00 additional per month. 4. One additional day of janitorial services at the Clark Building for a total of seven (7) times per week $ 75.00 additional per month. TO"d Please remember that these prices are based on the premise that the CITY will approve the entire four tasks. 17610E66 d9S:E0 66-17Z-q0A r.: P.t2zLY!!tl/�'i /(!%f Yetee !di Currently, our work schedule at each facility is the following. Please understand that the time may vary in the event the facility is in use. Also, the three person crew works in the various buildings at different times. This schedule is approximate and does not include the periodic work such as window cleaning, floor cleaning, etc. GSA 5 P.M. CITY YARD 6 P.M. CITY HALL/COUNCIL CHAMBERS....7 P.M. POLICE (Detective Area Below).8 P.M. POLICE/FIRE/JAIL (Upstairs)...9 P.M. CLARK BUILDING 10 P.M. COMMUNITY CENTER 11 P.M. THRU 6 P.M. SUNDAY THRU FRIDAY. THRU 7 P.M. MONDAY THRU THURSDAY. THRU 9 P.M.(If Council not in session) THRU 9 P.M. SUNDAY THRU FRIDAY. THRU 10 P.M. SUNDAY THRU FRIDAY. THRU 11 P.M. SUNDAY THRU FRIDAY. THRU I A.M. SUNDAY THRU FRIDAY. Note: When council is in session, crew will clean the Clark Facility earlier and return to Council Chambers at a later time. If approved by you, the new cleaning schedule for each facility would be the same as above with the following additions. COMMUNITY CENTER 11 P.M. THRU 1 A.M. SATURDAY. COMMUNITY CENTER 10 P.M. THRU 2 P.M. DAY WORKER (7) DAYS PER WEEK. POLICE/FIRE/JAIL 9 P.M. THRU 11 P.M. SATURDAYS. CLARK BUILDING 1 A.M. THRU 2 A.M. SATURDAYS. If this new schedule conflicts with people who may be in jail on a Saturday night or with a dance/wedding at the Clark Facility, please let me know and we can make the necessary adjustments. As you know, these services (and more) are sorely needed in these buildings. I hope that these additional tasks are all approved by the City of Hermosa Beach for the betterment of all concerned. I trust this is the information you require. Sincerely, FERNANDO A. VILLAR FAV/gmd ZO' d t76ZOE66 dgg = £O 66-17Z-g0A Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Recommendation: March 2, 1999 Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999 AWARD OF BID FOR INSTALLATION OF A UTILITY BED ON A FORD F 250 PICKUP TRUCK It is recommended that the City Council award the bid for installation of a utility bed on a Ford F 250 Pickup Truck to Pacific Truck Equipment, Inc. for $8,868.00. Background: On September 30, 1998, the City Council approved the purchase of a Ford F 250 Pickup Truck with CNG fuel. Bids were prepared, sent to five local truck manufacturers and legally advertised. Staff made several follow up telephone calls to all parties prior to bidding. The results are as follows: COMPANY CITY BID/RESPONSE Pacific Truck Body Whittier $8,868 Royal Truck Body Paramount no response Paramount Truck Body Long Beach called back/no bid Trojan Truck Body Paramount no response California Truck Equipment Downey called back/no bid When following up with the potential bidders, some were not interested in removing and replacing the CNG fuel tanks. Analysis: The utility bed is necessary to hold the equipment and tools needed in daily Public Works operations. The CNG fuel tank needs to be removed and replaced in the installation; thus adding additional costs. Fiscal Impact: The original vehicle was purchased with AQMD Funding and the Equipment Replacement Fund. The utility bed will be purchased through the Equipment Replacement Fund for $8,868.00. 1 • • Options: 1. Approve Staff's recommendation, resulting in the delivery of a Ford F 250 Pickup Truck with a utility bed for City services. 2. Reject the bid and notify staff to re -bid, resulting in a delay and the potential for no additional bidders. 3. Receive and file the bid, resulting in the delivery of a Ford F 250 Pickup Truck without a utility bed for City services. Respectfully submitted, CfAklmilTQAt Michael Flaherty Superintendent Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: arold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Stephen R.rell City Manager 2 FB9 5 /p wfi I es/cc it ems/ut i l itybed Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council �� X59-5969 �y9 March 2, 1999 Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT DURING. FY 1999 - 2000 Recommendation: Adopt the attached resolution ordering the preparation of a report for the annual levy of assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during fiscal year 1999 - 2000. Background: The Landscaping and Street Lighting District provides for the maintenance and operation of the citywide street lighting program and landscaping within street medians and parkways. Staff conferred with the City Attorney to determine the applicability of Proposition 218 to the City's Landscaping and Street Lighting District. Briefly, Proposition 218 contains an exception for existing assessments imposed exclusively to fund capital costs and maintenance and operation costs for sidewalks and streets. Based on the advice of the City Attorney, staff recommends that the City rely on this exemption and continue to levy assessments to pay for the maintenance and operation of street lights, street median and parkway landscaping without complying with the requirements of the Proposition so long as the assessments are not increased. Analysis: The Landscaping and Street Lighting District must be renewed annually. In approving the attached resolution, the Council authorizes the preparation of a report which will contain plans, specifications, costs and estimated assessments for the Landscaping and Street Lighting District. As required, the following necessary steps must be taken for the levy and collection of assessments for fiscal year 1999 - 2000 within the City's Landscaping and Street Lighting District. 1. The Director of Public Works file with the City Clerk the report consisting of, among other things, the map and the assessments. 2. The City Council adopt a resolution approving the report of the Director of Public Works. 3. The City Council adopt a resolution which sets the date, time and the place for a public hearing in order to accept input on Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1999 - 2000. lb • • 4. The City Council adopt a resolution confirming map and assessment for Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1999 — 2000 and levy the set assessment rate per unit for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1999 and ending June 30, 2000. 5. The City Council adopt the fiscal year 1999 - 2000 estimated revenue for secured collections for the Landscaping and Street Lighting District Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Let the District lapse; thereby, causing a potential increased General Fund obligation of approximately $449,000. 2. Retain the district and modify level of service. Attachments: Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report Respectfully submitted, is Leh' Homayoun Behboodi Associate Engineer Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: arold C. Williams, P.E. Stephe rrell City Manager F/B95/ccitems/ccstland2 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO PREPARE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4, OF CHAPTER 1 OF THE "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", BEING DIVISION 15, PART 2 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND SERVICING OF STREET AND SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING AND APPURTENANT WORK IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1999 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2000. HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1999-2000 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, proposes to renew the existing assessment district designated as "Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999" pursuant to the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the assessment district includes all parcels of land within the City and shall be redesignated as the HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1999-2000"; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to maintain and operate streets and sidewalks within the assessment district, including the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities located in and along such streets and sidewalks. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby redesignates the existing Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1998-1999 as the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 1999-2000. SECTION 2. That the Director of Public Works is hereby ordered to prepare and file a report in accordance with Article 4, of Chapter 1 of the, "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the maintenance and operation of streets and sidewalks within the assessment district, including -1- the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities located in and along such streets and sidewalks, for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 1998 and ending June 30, 2000 all as set forth in this resolution. SECTION 3. That a certified copy of this resolution be presented to the Director of Public Works for his/her information and guidance. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceeding of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of March, 1999. ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , CITY CLERK , CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: FB95/resolut/resost -2- i • March 3, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999 SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC LEASE RENEWAL FOR ROOMS 7 & 11 IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER Recommendation The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff recommend that Council approve the attached lease agreement between the City and the South Bay Free Clinic for the use of Rooms 7 & 11 in the Community Center. Background The South Bay Free Clinic was awarded a grant in 1992 that enables them to lease office space. They moved their administrative offices of the HIV Program from their main facility in Manhattan Beach to the Community Center. Room 7 houses the "hot line" and the staff of the program. They conduct meetings, training and occasionally support groups but do not conduct any medical services. On February 28, 1995 the South Bay Free Clinic requested to lease Room 11 in the Hermosa Beach Community Center for counseling sessions about their HIV program. Analysis Revenue generated from the lease of Rooms 7 and 11 (1,500 sq. ft.) is $1,470 per month ($.98 sq. ft.) beginning April 1, through June 30, 1999 and, $1,545 per month ($1.03 sq. ft.) from July 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000. The attached lease conforms to the present rental policy (approved by Council on April 28, 1998). IEstimated Fiscal Impact: FY 98-99: $18,315 Respectfully submitted, Tra3+ `ltes Admi istrative Aide Concur: Director, Community Resources Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 79K) Viki Copeland Director, Finance HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 9th day of March, 1999, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and South Bay Free Clinic, (Lessee). A. Recitals: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Community Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One (1) year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1999, and ending on the 31st day of March , 2000. 2. Description of Premises. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Rooms 7 and 11 - 1500 sq. ft. in the Community Center 3. Rent. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent according to the following schedule: April 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999 : $1,470 per month ($.98) sq. ft.. July 1, 1999 through March 31, 2000: $1,545 per month ($1.03) sq. ft. • • Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental payment on the first day of the following month. 3A. Other Conditions. The following additional conditions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises/building or placed in any windows. 3. All window treatments must receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. All remodel work shall receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. Use. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Meeting Room (11) and Administrative Offices (7) and for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development 5. Insurance Liability. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a combined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: • • (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. Worker's Compensation Insurance. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and furnish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be canceled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. Insurance Companies. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. Condition of the Premises Upon Termination of the Lease. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good condition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Lessee took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon demand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. Construction. Lessee is prohibited from making any alterations performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. Destruction, Partial Destruction or Necessity to Repair because of Conditions Caused by Other than Lessee. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the premises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction of repair if such reconstruction or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be terminated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. • • 9. Hold Harmless. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any direct or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its officers, agents and employees arising out of the Lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all action, suits or other proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. • 10. Rules, Regulations and Ordinances. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Community Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. Taxes and Charges. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. Default. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pursuant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. Notice. Any notice required to be made or given pursuant to the provisions of this lease may be either personally served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Lessor: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 Lessee: SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC 1807 Manhattan Beach Blvd. Manhattan Beach, California 90266 Attn: Suzanne Rivera, Executive Director Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. • 1 14. Attorneys Fees. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee may not sublease all or any portion of the premises without the written consent of the City, which consent may be granted or denied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. Successors. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 17. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this lease both parties reserve the right to terminate the lease at any time and without cause upon giving 30 days written notice to other party. In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first herein above set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: Executive Director • March 2, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 9, 1999 PROJECT NO. CIP 97-182 & CIP 97-183, MYRTLE AVENUE AND LOMA DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the call for bids; and 2. Instruct the City Clerk to post a Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for said project. Background: Residents on Myrtle Avenue and Loma Drive have petitioned requesting undergrounding overhead utilities. The City Council has agreed to form the district under the combined proceeding of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, the Debt Limitation Act of 1931 and the newly adopted requirements of Proposition 218. By doing so, the City Council will be able to levy assessments on properties within the district that receive benefits. The City Council at their meeting of January 14, 1997, approved a recommendation to move forward with the process of creating the Underground District. On January 14, 1997, the City Council authorized staff to hire Berryman & Henigar to provide assessment engineering services for the proposed districts. Prior to engaging Berryman & Henigar, Council approved an agreement between the City and Southern California Edison for the preparation of preliminary design and engineering documents for the districts. Analysis: The engineering and construction documents are complete. In order for the Assessment Districts to move forward, firm construction costs must be obtained so that Berryman & Henigar can complete the Preliminary and Final Engineer's Report. The plans and specifications are available in the office of the Director of Public Works for review. An updated project schedule is attached for your information. Also attached, are maps indicating the boundaries of the districts. lj • • Fiscal Impact: The funds will be reimbursed to the City General Fund once the Underground Utility District is established. However, if the Underground Utility District is not established then funds expended from the City General Fund can not be recovered. Attachments: Proposed Diagram of Assessment Districts Updated Project Schedule Respectfully submitted, ).-1,,,,,‘:tcJize.,_1_____ 'Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: di:44:4e.44-zod Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Steph ' '! : ell City Manager 2 F/B95/pwfiles/ccitems/lomamyrtle PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (MYRTLE AVE / LOMA DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA 6 8 \a A Q y .J.I' • • / P / _ \ S • $ \fi'�A s HEAM 1 .„ QRST\ '� �/ „2-3--. 2 / 6 \ �© 9 4 \ 9 3 Q •, 5 4 • • 9 7� • / i y .8 9L ••• • 101 15 RM0 ' b y 6 0 0 0 • xj 6 5 n n • Te1Nce 11 • SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS FEE i DOCUMENT N0. FILED THIS DAY OF 799_, AT THE HOUR OF _ O'CLOCK __.M. IN BOOK PAGES OF MAPS OF ASSSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 2 6 4 v /2 60 •o 26 27 5% 2; 17 a 9 x 1 • 2 • • Z 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INTHIN MAP SHOWING PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Na 57-1, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ATA REGULAR MEETING THEREOF. HELD ON THE _ DAY OF 109 BY ITS RESOLUTION 70, 21 22 y BEACH 24Th 5•k x •• 9 / 16 T7 • 7 CITY CLERK, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE DAY OF 19') CITY CLERK', CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • 64 •• •E TRAC • • \ 5646 4 6 a � morrce THE BOUNDARY OF THE MYRTLE AVENUE PORTION OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COINCIDES 41711 HERMOSA BEACH, BLOCK 25 (LOTS 2 - 7) AND BLOCK 26, PECOPOED IN MAP BOOK 7-25-20; THE FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, BLOCK 28, BLOCK 29, BLOCK 30 (LOTS 6 - 17), BLOCK 64 (107S 10 - II), BLOCK 65. BLOCK 67 (LOTS 1, 13 - 14), RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 1-59-60; HERMOSA TERRACE TRACT, 8LOCK 3 AND BLOCK 5 (1015 40, 54)0), RECORDED IMAP AP BOOK HERMOSA TERRACE ANNEX, BL000 1, RECORDED IN MAP BOOK II -2I, TRACT No. 113 (LOTS 9 - 22. .'.20 LOTS 23 - 30, 47 - 53. 55 - 60, RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 17-133 THE BOUNDARY OF THE LOMA DRIVE PORTION OF THE ASSES:MENT DISTRICT COINCIDES 7610 FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, BLOCK 55 (LOT 9), BLOCK 56 (LOTS 1 - 9) AND BLOCK 57 (LOTS I - 10) RECORDED IN MAP BOOK I-59-60; SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, BLOCK 74 (PORTIONS OF LOTS 5 h 6). RECORDED IN MAP BOOT( 3-7I-72. HISS' 5ECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH. BLOCK 1 (LOTS I - 16. 24 - 20) AND BLO0K 2 (LOTS 1 - G), RECORDED IN MAP BOON 7-173, TRACT No. 1070 (LOTS 1 - 14) RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 17-130. TRACT No. 1072 (LOTS 1 - IG) RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 17-137; TRACT No. 1040 (LOTS I - 28) RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 25-39; TRACT No 1677. BLOCK A (LOTS I - 9). BLOCK B (LOTS 1 - 9 AND A PORTION OF LOT I0). BLOCK E (LOTS 1 3) , BLOCK F (LOTS 1 - 3), RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 20-784: TRACT Na 1086, BLOCK G (LOTS 1 - 9), BLOCK H (LOTS 1 - 10), BLOCK J (LOTS 1 - 7AND A PORTION OF LOTS 13 AND 14), BLOCK K (LOT5 1 - 5. 3 - 9), RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 20-188; TRACT N,, 1851LOT5 1 - 10) RECORDED IN MAP B006 25-40; TRACT N,. 2002. BLOCK V (LOTS 6 - 10) AND BLOCK W (LOTS I - 5) RECORDED IN MAP 8006 22-154-155; TRACT No. 44073 (LOTS 7 - 5. 13 - 17, 25 - 28) RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 1091-02-63. _Y & OS 24771 pi.. 10 N GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET 1 1100( - 10079 LEGEND PROPOSED BOUNDARY FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No, 97-1 10 LOT NUMBER O POLE TO BE REMOVED O POLE TO REMAIN • POLE TO BE ADDED ®Berryman & Henlyar�, • >W h.IT� S: \7080.CCT\HERM.TS. \I IO131Y\DR61NC5\H897-1.4.1 9/29/97 ILR 1 LOMA DR PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (MYRTLE AVE / LOMA DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA CO CYPRESS AVE. TRACT K 3 15 17 N 19 20 21 22 23 790 24 e B -�� 3 F65 0fD 8 2 4 S 1 LOMA 6 TO 7 8 9 10 11 n ,7 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS 14 15 16 tl 3 0 VIACT2 8,0p60 ,1`p6 O0 0 t0 HEP LOT S BLD 5 6 7 8 9 10 1; 712 1 y NO. 1151 15 1 0 4 �A 90 NEFNIONA TRALT 14 10 12 1; 10 7 6 5 4 3 12 40. 70 VALLEY DR. °DR NO EGO. 1 8,0p60 ,1`p6 O0 0 t0 HEP LOT S BLD 1 5A eEAOH LOT 6 4 •.L1 5 1 Wes 22 23 BMI 24 25 SEA 26 01 TRACT 1 2 8 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 0 14 N0.1516 15 °DR NO EGO. 1 5? 1 39E Z. A 1 i •.L1 5 1 Wes TR 6 28 1I 12 3 I NA ]N-Y 25 24 NP. 20 66 FRSE 1 TO 6 56 4 3 IEAMOSA BEACF TRACT 22 21 20 Is NO 97 15 16 0 10 9 14 A 1� M - SEE SHEET LJ z MONTEREY BLVD. SCALE: 1-= 100' GRAPHIC SCALE 0 00 ton •IM a ( IN FEET 1 nic1, WOO LEGEND U PROPOSED BOUNDARY FOR ASSESSMENT DIOTOOCT Nu 97—I 10 LOT NUMBER ID POLE TO BE REMOVED F) POLE TO REMAIN • POLE TO BE ADDED ®Berryman & Hen. !ger, =:71 ,y ,,, 5: \$PRO.IECT\HEFMUSA\IIflL1TY\ORNINGS\NBl>-1. Jwy 9/2'9/U' TLF • • PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (MYRTLE AVE / LOMA DRIVE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA YPRESS AVE. CJ W = TRACT 2 W W cn LJ - J 6 7 8 9 LOMA U u 6 4 4 2 1` C 07 0' z 0 CT 10 19 J 7 CT 1 2 0 4 5 6 7 O ( U J U a t� 6 1 21 3 1677 0, P a• 3 4 NO. 200 2 1. 4 1 4 7 6 12.1 6 4 4 2 1` C 07 0' z 0 CT 10 19 J 7 CT 1 2 0 4 5 6 7 O ( U J U a t� 6 1 21 3 1677 12 90- a• 3 4 NO. 200 5 1 2 8 0 4 5 6 7 8 9 U a u 13 t2 10 9 6 7 NO 107 6 5 t5 2 5 4 5 6 7 U C DR. 2 2 4 N0. 168 5 4 7 SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS C TRACT NO. 44073 23 24 25 MONTEREY V BLVD. to 2_! $GALE: I..= 100' GRAPHIC SCALE • 50 1•51 ttn ( IN FEET 1 Inc 11 - 001[. LEGEND 000000ED BO(1NDARY FOR ASSES7MENT DISTRICT No. 97-1 b LOT NUMBER Q FOLE TO BE REMOVED O POLE TO REMAIN • POLE TO BE ADDED EBorrymen 5:\,090,0Cr\MEFNUSA\II MIT Y\OFIMN65V1997-1.4.g 9/29/97 RR C98L'0N X}I/XZ 3 I 0 UPDATED PROJECT SCHEDULE N Myrtle Avenue and Loma Drive Utility Undergrounding Assessment Districts Dated 312.199 ACTION Notice to Proceed TENT. DATE City authorizes payment to Edison Petition Process mid Feb -97 late Mar -97 complete Feb Final Design & Estimates to be received. _.._......_._............_....._..........._.. by: 1 -Mar -99 Bid P&S to City for Review by: 8 -Mar -99 Council to authorize Bid Bid Proposal Advertised_ Preliminary Boundary Map produced by: 9 -Mar -99 by: 11 -Mar -99 mid -Mar -99 Walk through of project area with Edison Submit Proposed Boundary Map Mar mid -Mar -99 Public Works Bid 1 -Apr -99 Submit Draft Prel. Engrs.Rpt _ Myrtle to City- mid -April -99 Submit Draft Prel. Engrs Rpt - Loma to City mid -April -99 Contact Property Owners Committee I mail Newsletter mid -April -99 Public Workshop Meeting mid -April -99 Review Comments with City.., mid-April _.. Submit Final Prel. Engineers Report / incl Envirn / R/W mid -April -99 Council Meeting - Items: Resolution of Intention to form District, submit Prelim Eng Report 8, Boundary Map...............................__,......................_............_.._........., 27 -Apr -99 Record. Boundary.Ma.P.._............_._.............................._....-................................................._...................................._ ..._.end -Apr -99 Mail Notices/Ballots by: early May -99 Public Information Meeting late May -99 Council Meeting: Public Hearing (45 days after Notices)/Tabulate Vote I Form District, Final Eng Report, Asmt Diagram, Bond Documents mid Jun -99 Mail Notices of Recordation by.. Tate Jun -99 Record Asmt Diagram & Asmts at County by. late Jun_ 99 30 day Cash Collection Period hreugh late Jul 99 List of Paid/Unpaid Assessments earlyAug-99 Bond Sizing / Bond Closing mid Aug -99 Submit Annual Asmts to Count mid Aug -99 SA$2ROJECTWERMOSA'1i JTn iTY(OFRFSP\scixdjie2 xls Page 1 Berryman & Henigar • 0 0 N • ee-c#zzJ .*/#0, PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 2, 1999 MEETING Roll Call Present: Chairperson Dunbabin, Commissioners Abrams, Gonzales, Frances Absent: Commissioner Kuh Staff: Rooney, Flaherty Approval of November and December 1998 Minutes Motion: "To approve as submitted." Gonzales/Frances Ayes — Dunbabin/Frances/Gonzales Abstain — Abrams Matters for Commission Consideration A. Election of Officers: Motion: "To elect Sam Abrams as Chairperson". Gonzales/Frances - All Ayes Motion: "To elect Sal Gonzales as Vice Chair". Francis/Abrams - All Ayes B. 1997 Plan for Hermosa Valley Park Renovation Motion: "To approve list as drafted in 1997 with amendments identified in bold below": 1k i • • Recommended Valley Park Improvements Facility/Area Commission recommendation Restrooms > Renovate or replace existing restrooms. > Bring to ADA standards. > Design restroom so doors face the playground equipment. Walkways > Renovate walkways only as required to meet ADA standards. > Consider using concrete to reduce trip hazards (Council wanted asphalt at last review). Landscaping ➢ Improve park perimeter with landscaping. ➢ Delete item to plant mature trees around the soccer field. > Address erosion issues in the park. Basketball Court D. Resurface/improve existing courts. ➢ Consider erecting lower standards for youngsters. Picnic Facilities > Renovate picnic areas and equipment. ➢ Install additional tables and benches. Cement area (northwest side) > Incorporate a park facility with a cement track and pad to accommodate: tricycle riding, volleyball and placement of birthday party bounce toys. Irrigation ➢ Design and renovate sprinkler system as needed. ➢ Crown soccer/baseball field for improved drainage. Motion: Frances/Abrams - All Ayes C. Selection of Subcommittee for Millennium Celebration Logo Design Contest (Youth) Motion: To assign Commissioners Gonzales and Dunbabin as judges for the logo design competition. Frances/Abrams - All Ayes • • D. Memorial Donation Program: Parks Motion: "To approve the 1999 Parks Donation List". Abrams/Gonzales - All Ayes E. South Bay Free Clinic Lease Renewal for Room 7 & 11 in the Community Center Motion: "To approve the lease agreement between the City and the South Bay Free Clinic for the use of Rooms 7 & 11 in the Community Center". Gonzales/Frances — All Ayes Note to Staff: Community Center Master Plan Workshop — Put on April, 1999 Tentative Future Agenda. Adjournment: 8:25 PM Abrams/Frances - All Ayes • 2-r-L-%-itti is---) -#,--592o %y HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL March 2, 1999 Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #24968 (C.U.P. CON NO. 97-27, PDP NO. 97-30) LOCATION: 125 4TH STREET APPLICANT(S): LARRY PEHA REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A 2 - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #24968 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #24968 at their January 20, 1998 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Process Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the L.A. County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness (pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4)of the Subdivision Map Act). An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval. Typically applicants have not submitted for final map approval until projects are near completion and ready to be sold. Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, "...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder...." pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. 1 I • • Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Sol Blume -1d, Director Community ) evelopment Department 444 Stephen R./ rrell City Mana:er Z Respectfully s bmitted, Ken Robertson Associate Planner y/f:fin map1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • • RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #24968 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 125 4TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on March 9, 1999 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolutions P.C. No. 98-5 adopted after hearing on January 20, 1998. E. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to 15268(b)(3), "Approval of final subdivision maps", of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #24968 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of westerly 36.5' of Lots 23 and 24, Block 38, First Addition to Hermosa Beach, Recorded in Book 1, Pages 59 and 60 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of Said County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 125 4th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 9th day of March, 1999. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California AI UST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 3 f:fm125rs • • ./9/5 February 16, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 9, 1999 PERMANENT RETENTION OF OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS ON SIXTH STREET, WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Retain the existing raised barricade channelizing 6th Street, west of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH); and 2. Retain 6th Street as a short section of a one way street between 125 and 145 feet west of PCH. Background: The City Council at its May 28, 1998, meeting considered the results of a study by Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LLG) relative to 6th Street, west of PCH. The study presented the ramifications of closing 6th Street to westbound traffic west of the commercial area. The City Council then approved placement of a barrier on 6th Street for a six-month trial period after which a review of the impacts on 2nd, 5th and 8th Streets would be determined. Analysis: The City Traffic Engineer has monitored the traffic circulation and access impacts of these installations since their inception during September 1998. A physical barrier was placed across the north half of 6th Street approximately 125 feet west of PCH. Appropriate pavement markings and signing were placed to allow full access to the commercial activities to the north of 6th Street. However, vehicular traffic would not be allowed to proceed west on 6th Street toward Ardmore Avenue. Turning movement traffic counts were taken at PCH, 2nd, 5th, and 8th Streets prior to the installation of the barrier (July 20, 1998) and after the barrier had been in place for two months (December 10, 1998). They were taken from 7:00-9:00 AM, 11:00 AM - 1:00 PM and 3:00-6:00 PM. 4 • • The results are as follows: 1. At 6th Street, the PCH northbound left turns into 6th Street daily total was reduced by 50% (118 to 59). 2. At 6th Street, the southbound right turns into 6th Street from PCH remained constant (152 versus 154). 3. At 5th Street, the PCH northbound left turns into 6th Street daily total increased by approximately 20% (132 up to 169). 4. At 5th Street, the southbound right turns into 5th Street increased approximately /o (136 up to 243). 10% 5. At 8th Street, the southbound left turns and the northbound right turns into 8th Street from PCH increased approximately 2%. ADO n'1.0 -4 -11 - At oma - At 2nd Street, the PCH northbound left turns and southbound right turns into 2nd Street did not change more than 1%. Conclusions: From the above information it is clear that the residential traffic attempting to reach 6th Street diverted to 5th Street rather that 8th Street or 2nd Street. For southbound traffic it was easier to travel past 6th Street to 5th Street and make a "right turn loop" (west to Ardmore Ave. then a right turn into eastbound 6th Street) rather than right turning into 8th Street and then making two lefts (left onto Ardmore Ave. and a left into 6th Street). Discussion: The residents along 5th, 2nd and 8th Streets have not expressed to the City staff any perceived or real problems with respect to the 6th Street barricade. Field observation by City staff in the vicinity of the barrier indicate that there are some violators that chose to "slip around" the barrier. Of greater concern is the commercial traffic that utilizes the small section of Sixth Street between the barrier and PCH and the parking lots to the north. The parking lots are very restricted in terms of mobility. Sixth Street is an approximate 30 -foot wide street that has limited parking primarily on the south side for auto repair related uses. This makes circulation in this area somewhat limited, leading to congestion for short periods of time. The accident history in this short section and along the entire length of both 5th and 6th Streets has not indicated any increase over the occasional property damage accident. 2 • • It is believed that the barricade situation has been a positive improvement despite some shifting of traffic to an adjacent city street (5th Street). However, the traffic volume shift appears to be insignificant with respect to volume level and accident increases. Fiscal Impact: None at this time. Attachment: Site Map Background Information Respectfully submitted, not available for signature Edward Ruzak City Traffic Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: tiotti Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: 3 arold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Stephen t'. Burrell City Manager F/B95/pwfiles/ccitems/6thst liktt=-.34aai :tif,0 5SP )4ii;;A7,75=',,,,Y.' • • • • •• • •• • ATO -P,„ Itelt=iij LEARNED LUMBER 635 PCI -1 4 WON. r.e .v CLASSIC AUTO UPHOLSTERY 619 PCI'! . : ..,.•, 041 y. • , -.,41:-:-.,:i,;.:-.• . . -,' • . ys......1., , . . • . - . ' '... . k All 1::: i...::: , :..., .; 1: ,.,,,.- ,,,, —......t.. '.. .lii:th::.t.'_211.;.-k4 7;j-ktiff-1.1‘! Lauren Gezurian - 833 14th Street, for the cooperation that agreement. The public h-. ing closed at 7:59 P.M. Action: To s the Conditional Vesting Tentative P project be developed reached with neighbors Donald Karasevicz, and, to direct details this a Motion May carried b tain the Planning e Permit, Pre cel Map a ren ff to retu eement and this ac Edgerton, second Revi unanimous vote. thanked eve • e produce the C• • ' ission' s approval of e Development Plan, and ith the provision that the nformance with the agreement d May 20, 1998, and signed by Gezurian and Aslam Amlani; with a Resolution that on, ky. The motion At e hour of 8:01 the order of the lic Hearing item 4. MUNICIPAL MATTERS agen moved to 6. TRAFFIC STUDY - 6TH STREET WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. (Continued from meeting of May 12, 1998). Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated May 20, 1998. Councilmember Reviczky declared a potential conflict of interest due to living within the 300 foot boundary of the project and left the dais and the room at 9:28 P.M. Community Development Director Blumenfeld presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 9:30 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Cynthia Kinney - 635 Sixth Street, acted as spokesperson for the Sixth Street residents shown below and spoke of the increase in commercial traffic going westbound on Sixth Street due to changes in parking areas at Learned Lumber; asked that westbound traffic turning from the Learned Lumber parking lot onto Sixth Street be restricted; Rosamond Fogg - 610 Sixth Street; David Cohn - 631 Sixth Street; Elizabeth Connley - 650 Sixth Street; Scott Alden - 646 Sixth Street; Margaret MacDonald - 650 Sixth Street; Larry Taggart - 655 Sixth Street, and, Stephen Kinney - 635 Sixth Street. Public participation closed at 9:37 P.M. City Council Minutes 05-28-98 Page 9715 Action: To direct staff to establish a trial, six-month temporary closure of the westbound traffic lane on Sixth Street from the western edge of the commercial zone at the parking lot exit. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz and the absence of Reviczky. Councilmember Reviczky returned at 9:45 LORETO PLAZA - LEASE OF ADDITIONAL AIRSPACE. Memorand from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 21, 1998. Councilmember Bowler declared a potential confl 't of terest due to owning a business that would be - fected by the additional lease space and left the dai and the roo\t 9:46 P.M. City Mnager Burrell presented the staf report and responddd to Council questions. Public particip address the counc Jerry Ne air rights extensi- terms sa improvemen Shirley Cassell to allowing to be leased Loreto Plaza; Flatlev - Fa gave his management charged $ right le apprai diffi Vi Fal R tion opened at 9:51 P.M. 1 on this item were: ton - applicant for 38 ace, explained th on the current of air rig ng that he s in the Hermo n a Con Garr oming forward to square feet of new history of the air lease, asked for an s and agreed to City greed to remove the new ent of a default; Beach, spoke in opposition itional amount of air space v= the pedestrian passageway in Face Fenner's Fishack partner, ckground in municipal property said th t the City of Los Angeles .05 per square foot per year for air sing and said that the last air rights 1 had been in 67 so it would be very It to find compar''�abble property; and, cent - President o Fat Face Fenner's oon and President of the Hermosa Beach taurant and Tavern Ow er's Association, oke of the problems that the delays had aused and asked for a resoluton of the issue tonight. Public participation closed at 10:18 P.M. Act n: To approve the draft lease for new air space co'tingent upon approval of more detailed ply ns for 1:ndscape, lighting and signage. otion Oakes, second Reviczky. The motion failed ue to the dissenting votes of Benz and Mayor Edgerton an the absence of Bowler. City Council Minutes 05-28-98 Page 9716 • • AYE Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, NOES: Mayor Edgerton or Pro Tempore Benz 3. ITEMS REMO - FROM TH CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(h), shown in , an ) were heard at this time but are er for cla P - lc comments on items emoved from the consent alendar are shown under the app ••riate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None MUNICIPAL MATTERS 4. PROPOSED HALF STREET CLOSURE OF 6th STREET AT 190 FEET WEST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 22, 1998. Councilmember Reviczky declared a potential conflict of interest, stepped down from the dais and left the room. City Manager Burrell presented the responded to Council questions. Public address participation opened at 7:58 P.M. the Council on this item were: Danny Farshadfar - business owner at 601 Pacific Coast Highway, said the street closure would adversely affect his business and would simply divert traffic to Fifth and Eighth streets; also thought banning left turns onto Pacific Coast Highway made no sense, especially during off -traffic times; Elizabeth Conley - 650 Sixth Street, asked Council to proceed with the temporary street closure which had been granted; said the residents on that street face unique problems; Steve Kinney - 635 Sixth Street, spoke in support of the street closure; urged Council to proceed with the six-month trial period; and Margaret MacDonald - 650 Sixth Street, supported moving ahead with the street closure, noting it would be re-evaluated after six months; had no objection to the City requesting that Caltrans remove the right -turn -only sign. staff report and Coming forward to Public participation closed at 8:05 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: (1) reaffirm Council's decision of May 28, 1998, and order the installation of the closure with a ten day notice; and City Council Minutes 07-28-98 Page 9762 • • (2) direct staff to request that Caltrans remove the right -turn -only restriction from Sixth Street. Motion Bowler, second Oakes. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Mayor Pro Tempore Benz and the absence of Mayor Edgerton and Councilmember Reviczky. City Manager Burrell said the closure should take place within 10-14 days and the trial period would end in February 1999. Councilmember Reviczky returned to the dais at 8:01 P.M. 5. REVIEW OF MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENT AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT. Memoran••m from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld d ed July 16, 1998. Community Development Director Blumenfeld responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Publi participation opened at 8:18 P.M. Coming forward to addres the Council on this item was: Betty Martin - Hermosa Beach, equested that Council reconsider its removal •f the 17 -foot setback rule in the Shakespea e tract; suggested that the width of the al ey be a consideration in determining setback Public participat'on closed at 8.20 P.M. Action: To di ect staf at the earliest •ate p be present, to d cu open space requirem the Council commen (1) concerns tha sin higher par ing an those app ed to mul (2) concerns -bout the de of some decks over dri and ho ' open space formu (3) looki g at alternatives s are- ratio rather than stra (4) de -loping ways to ensure a chitectural character of evelopment while allowing for to the potential allowed by zoni Mo ion Bowler, second Reviczky. Th motion carried, oting the absence of Mayor Edgerton. Ci Manager Burrell said the special meeting •uld be set up a workshop format. to schedule a special meeting, ssible when a full Council would s the parking space, setback and s for all residential zones, noting his evening, which included: e family homes are penalized with open space requirements than -family dwellings; nition of open space, the use ways counting as open space, s are determined; ch as changing the floor ht setback rules; and e preservation of the n-ighborhoods with new he expansion of lots The meeting recessed at 8:30 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:50 P.M. City Council Minutes 07-28-98 Page . 63 v. T.A44 29-99 11:55 AM L ED LUMBER LEARNED LUMBER LUMBER PLYWOOD WINDOWS AND DOORS CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE BUILDERS HARDWARE 310 5894 P.01 i9ECEJ W D FEB - 2 1999 635 Pacific Coast Hwy.. Harmon Reach. CA 90254 • (310) 374.3406 Fax (310) 374-3410 • CI Segundo yard (310) 322-4595 Fax (310) 3224921 January 29, 1999 VIA FACSIMILE Stephen Burrell, City Manager And Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear City Manager and Members of the City Council: The following is our input regarding your March 9"' Review of the Sixth Street Closure. As you may recall, 1 stood before the City Council last year and supported the local resident's request to ban commercial traffic on Sixth Street, west of the lumberyard. You chose to restrict all westbound traffic on Sixth Street (west of the lumberyard), which has caused a hardship for some of the businesses on the Highway, that rely on readily available residential traffic flows. I am sorry that some of the businesses that deal with residential (vs. commercial) customers have had to suffer because of these traffic restrictions. However, I remain in support of a ban on commercial traffic on Sixth Street (west of the lumberyard), especially if we are able to get the Motel project approved. Without a larger highway frontage, Learned Lumber will not have sufficient access to Pacific Coast Highway, and will be forced to continue to rely primarily on its access off of Sixth Street and possibly even Seventh Street. Yours, Michael Learned SUPPLEMENTAL A INFORMATION `t • • March 1, 1999 The Honorable Robert Benz, Mayor The Honorable Julie Oakes, Mayor Pro Tem The Honorable John Bowler, Council Member The Honorable Sam Y. Edgerton, Council Member The Honorable J. R. Reviczky, Council Member City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Re: Sixth Street Westbound Barricade MAR - 3 1999 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Dear Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and City Council Members: On July 28, 1998, the City Council granted our request to install a westbound barricade on Sixth Street, just south of the commercial zone, for a six-month trial period. The primary purpose for installing the barricade was twofold: to increase public safety and to decrease damage to public property by requiring the lumber trucks leaving Learned Lumber to travel east on Sixth Street to Pacific Coast Highway. The westbound barricade was installed on August 17, 1998, and, as such, the six-month trial period was completed on February 16, 1999. Based on the success of the six-month trial period, we respectfully request that the Council allow the westbound barricade to remain on Sixth Street permanently. Our safety and the quality of our lives have been restored. City sidewalks and curbs are no longer being damaged by the ten -wheel lumber trucks. And, the nonresidential commuter traffic generated by the nine businesses at PCH and Sixth Street, is being forced to use the Highway. Compromise Proposal In reaching its decision to install a westbound barricade, the Council weighed the commercial and residential interests. Striking a balance between these interests, the Council decided to limit the barricade to westbound traffic only. This compromise proposal has allowed business customers to have continued access to the nine PCII businesses via Ardmore and Sixth Streets. As residents, we believe the Council has reached a fair and equitable solution. Changes in the Commercial Zone Due to a series of changes in the commercial zone, the residential portion of Sixth Street has become the primary ingress/egress route for lumber trucks and other commercial traffic. We detailed many of these changes in the document that we presented to the Council in July 1998. (See attached.) SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Li • • Klean-Rite Cleaners On December 14, 1998, the City received a letter from Danny Farshadfar, owner of Klean- Rite Cleaners at 601 Pacific Coast Highway. In his letter, Mr. Farshadfar says that the westbound barricade has "had an adverse effect on [his] business." Importantly, the only adverse effect that Mr. Farshadfar specifies in his correspondence is "customer inconvenience." We urge the Council to find that Mr. Farshadfar's interest in ensuring customer convenience is outweighed by the public safety and infrastructure issues detailed above. Interest in Keeping Nonresidential Commercial Trac on Major Thoroughfares Furthermore, we urge the Council to find that the westbound barricade is helping to encourage nonresidential commercial traffic to travel on major thoroughfares, instead of on residential side streets. Sixty -percent (60%) of the signatures on Mr. Farshadfar's petition are from nonresidents. These nonresident business patrons should be encouraged to use PCH. The westbound barricade is helping to achieve this goal. History of Klean-Rite Cleaners Site In addition, Mr. Farshadfar's letter reminded us of some additional history. For many years, the Klean-Rite Cleaners site was a real estate office. The traffic generated from this office was negligible. In recent years, the volume of traffic generated at this site has increased significantly, as evidenced by the large number of signatures on Mr. Farshadfar's petition. Again, this change was approved by the City without mitigating measures for increased traffic. Reliance on Residential Portion of Street Finally, it is unreasonable for a PCH business to rely on the residential portion of a side street as its primary means of egress. Klean-Rite Cleaners is located on PCH. Nonetheless, Mr. Farshadfar contends that his customers have a right to use Sixth Street as their primary means of egress. This is unreasonable. The Council has already fashioned a compromise. The Council considered possible adverse effects to the PCH businesses, and, as such, limited the barricade to westbound traffic only. Frankly, Mr. Farshadfar should be thanking the Council for refusing to block off Sixth Street in its entirety, as we originally requested. Conclusion Based on the foregoing, we respectfully request the City Council to permanently close Sixth Street to westbound traffic, by allowing the existing barricade to remain in place 190 feet west of PCH. A permanent barricade is necessary, because given the choice, most of the customers and vendors exiting the nine PCH businesses will not voluntarily choose to exit onto PCH. By allowing the westbound barricade to remain on Sixth Street, the Council will be increasing public safety, decreasing damage to public property, and encouraging nonresidents to travel on major thoroughfares. • • Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, SIXTH STREET RESIDENTS Attachments: Resident Signatures Exhibit A, Summary of Changes in the Commercial Zone • Joint Letter in Support of Sixth Street Westbound Barricade Resident Signatures Sign. ure • /-' e y/ , , // 6.s -p f#� Name (Printed) Address �. . ,. fr /2(12 c, �� / kt,'y�,-�/1/14c---Pe/7 kl Asn 171 c:4 Signat Name (Printed) Address Signature ?r/fignatZ Signature "�tC1ZESL \/VIRKOV ICI+ ().5S St . Name (Printed) Address 7—X6G �' �5S 6/ s i Name (Printed) Address )____7fritA 462 Naive (Printed) Address 77/400 e : L (. ,J c. -IA/ ( 5 /'_6` sr/? Name (Printed) Address c7'r� Name (Printed) Address • • Joint Letter in Support of Sixth Street Westbound Barricade Resident Signatures Signature Name (Printed) Address I ,r� MJ/4�GA5 ) —dame (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address o � Address Name (Printed) Address .,01-6/ic-r7 43. Name (Printed) Address Loci sL./ A- 6fll 6T .sem �f Name (Printed) Address • • Joint Letter in Support of Sixth Street Westbound Barricade Resident Signatures 4--ek21. We - Signature Signature Na (Printed) / Address Name (Printed) ‘iaa/r / Address Name (Printed) Address r JtZ� C.5/-* s( (r-7 Signature Name (Printed) Address JOHN (2� 41 &xm � Name (Printed) r Address `moi! ern• Signature t/�Si X i.. Address /9/?-ZIT.eZ Si, (Printed) rna�-r� F ZO �I( 6 f� Address Nameame (Pri1nted) • Joint Letter in Support of Sixth Street Westbound Barricade Resident Signatures Signature reld.n S/VCc ill Name (Printed) Address ignature 4AfikT S4� 6/f S'i tflf tc7 - Name (Printed) Address Ze./ 0-0 /1 /4,6. Name (Pted) Address Mr1L -Z'9t LO t V - Lv 54. 4(6 Name (Printed) J Address ( (04k S+ r Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed Address 1 • Joint Letter in Support of Sixth Street Westbound Barricade Resident Signatures dIa L GoD 1032, 4O�`SK x•15. Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address Signature Signature Signature Signature ►' t Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address • Joint Letter in Support of Sixth Street Westbound Barricade Resident Signatures • � 1 /V46Az,, " / z4w4- X3,7 0/k Signa Signature Signature Signature Signature Signature Name (Printed) Address RkejtofrizA 4/ca9-6/4- Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address Name (Printed) Address • • Sixth Street Traffic Coalition Petition in Support of Closure of Sixth Street To Through Traffic Between Pacific Coast Highway and Ardmore Avenue Introduction A. We are here this evening to request that the residential portion of Sixth Street be closed to give us relief from the enormous amount of commercial traffic generated from the businesses located on PCH. B. If we were in your position as City Council Members, we would have two primary concerns regarding this request: 1. First, recognizing that Learned Lumber has been in business for over 70 years, surely when you moved here, you expected to take some traffic from this business? 2. Second, if we grant your request and block off the residential portion of Sixth Street, we are likely to receive similar requests from other street abutting PCH. Is Sixth Street's situation so unique that we can distinguish its situation from the other streets that may request similar accommodations in the future? II. We would like to begin by addressing what Sixth Street was like when we moved here and why the traffic has increased dramatically since then. A. When most of the residents moved onto Sixth Street, Learned Lumber was considered a PCH business. There was only an alley that ran from the back of Learned onto Sixth Street. The current, expansive parking lot was not there. 1. In the late 1980's, Learned Lumber tore down three homes on Sixth Street and paved the property. They turned the three residential lots into a large, expansive parking lot on Sixth Street. 2. As a result, most of the customers began using Sixth Street to access this PCH business. B. In 1991, the City Council adopted a resolution establishing a "no parking" zone on the west -side of PCH. As a result, customers cannot park in front of Learned Lumber between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. (Monday through Friday). C. Learned Lumber also stopped using its PCH entrance. It moved its entrance to the rear, and for some time had two back entrances. Today, there is only one entrance, which is in the rear near the Sixth Street parking lot. -1- cxma /T A- • • D. And that is not all that has changed. Approximately two years ago, Learned Lumber closed its back gate on Seventh Street. 1. Prior to that time, the large lumber trucks traveled on Seventh Street. 2. Because the Seventh Street gate was closed, Sixth Street is now burdened with 18-19 massive lumber trucks traveling to and from Learned Lumber each week day. E. These changes have dramatically impacted the residential portion of Sixth Street. F. All these changes have occurred in the past eight years, and yet, the City has not taken any measures to mitigate the impact of the additional traffic volumes on Sixth Street. III. As a result of these dramatic changes, which occurred after most of the residents purchased their homes, A. Sixth Street now has a total of 1,635 vehicle trips per day, according to the Anastasi Development/Learned Lumber traffic study (as of 10/22/97); 1. Yet, Sixth Street is described as a "local roadway" not a "collector street" B. Sixth Street now takes 95% of Learned Lumber's traffic, equating to approximately 867 trips per day, according to the Anastasi Development/Learned Lumber traffic study; C. Only 5% of Learned Lumber's customers access the business from its PCH driveway, according to the Anastasi Development/Learned Lumber traffic study; D. In addition, there are eight other businesses adjacent to Sixth Street; E. There is a safety problem for our children; 1. With the birth of a new child last week, we are up to 12 children living on the street (most of the children are under ten years old) F. There is a safety problem getting out of our driveways; G. There is a safety problem with business customers driving too fast down the hill; 1. This problem is exacerbated on street cleaning days, when there is no parking on one side of the street, and the vehicles pick up even greater speeds. -2- s H. There is a safety problem because the large trucks have an extremely difficult time maneuvering the turn onto Ardmore; and I. There is a quality of life problem because the large trucks create excess noise and vibration, particularly when they come flying over the bump at the west -end of the street. IV. Finally, before closing, we would like to address why Sixth Street is significantly different from the other noncollector streets abutting PCH. A. First, the commercial lot depth on both sides of Sixth Street is 300 feet. 1. According to the zoning map, there is not another residential street where the PCH commercial zone encroaches this deep into a residential area. 2. And, there is no reason to believe this is going to change in the future. B. Second, there is a total of nine businesses adjacent to Sixth Street. 1. Sixth Street serves as the road testing track and parking lot for the six Mardikian automotive businesses, 2. a dry cleaner, 3. an automotive upholstery shop, and 4. Learned Lumber C. Third, one of these nine businesses, Learned Lumber, is the fifth largest business in the City 1. Learned Lumber fronts PCH. a. Before the construction of its parking lot in the late 1980's, it was only connected to Sixth Street by a rear alley. 2. Today, Sixth Street bears the burden of 95% of the customer traffic, equating to 867 trips per day. 3. And, Sixth Street is the only noncollector street that has ten -wheel trucks traveling on it. D. Finally, all of Learned Lumber's changes have been made in the past eight years, and yet, the dramatic impact on the residents has not been addressed by the City. -3- • • V. In summary, A. The nature and volume of traffic on Sixth Street have changed dramatically since we moved here. B. These changes have resulted in safety problems and have decreased the quality of our lives. C. There is not another noncollector street that will come to you with 1. a similar commercial lot depth, 2. a similar volume of traffic generated from adjacent PCH businesses, and 3. large ten -wheel truck traffic like we have on Sixth Street. D. And by making commercial traffic use PCH, there is a high probability that traffic will also be reduced on Fifth and Eighth Streets. 1. Currently, customers wishing to travel northbound on PCH drive their vehicles west on Sixth Street to Ardmore. A large portion of that traffic then accesses PCH via the lights at Fifth or Eight Streets. Closing the residential portion of Sixth Street, will force these vehicles out onto the highway. There will then be many routes available for them to use to redirect themselves north. VI. Therefore, we request that the City Council grant us relief by closing the residential portion of the street. A. We have the full support of the Sixth Street residents, and the Planning Commission. B. Mike Learned also expressed his support for the street closure at the Planning Commission meeting on September 16, 1997. C. And, there is precedent for this request in the community, because there are several closed streets already abutting PCH. VII. Thank you for your time and consideration. We would be happy to answer any questions that you may have. -4- Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ./09 February 17, 1999 Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999 PERMANENT RETENTION OF OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS ON THIRD STREET, EAST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND OCEAN VIEW AVENUE, BETWEEN 3RD AND 4TH STREETS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Retain the existing raised barricade channelizing 3rd Street, east of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH); 2. Retain 3rd Street as a two way street between PCH and 120 feet east of PCH; and 3. Retain the closure of Ocean View Avenue between 3rd and 4th Street. Background: The City Council at its May 28, 1998, meeting considered a request by concerned residents to close a portion of Ocean View Avenue, between 3rd and 4th Streets, and to develop a park. Also the residents requested that a barrier be built on 3rd Street so that commercial traffic would be limited to the parking lot behind the buildings on PCH. The City Council at its August 11, 1998, meeting approved the closure of Ocean View Avenue, between 3rd and 4th Streets, via raised barricades. They also approved the installation of a barricade on the north one-half of 3rd Street approximately 120 feet east of PCH. Further, 3rd Street, between these limits, was changed to two way traffic from one way traffic. Analysis: The City Traffic Engineer has monitored the traffic circulation and access impact of these installations since their inception during September 1998. Curb parking was removed from the south side of 3rd Street, between the commercial driveways and PCH, during this trail installation. Some curb parking was allowed on the north side of the street. • • The only response to the installation to date was the owner of Coast Lighting, located on -the southeast corner of PCH and 3rd Street. The owner wished to have the parking reinstated on the south side of 3rd Street. The Public Works Director and City Traffic Engineer met with the owner in late October 1998 and related that the curb parking removal was necessary for safety purposes. If vehicles were allowed to park on the south curb with the two-way traffic condition, then a right turning vehicle from northbound PCH into 3rd Street would be on the wrong side of the street. This could lead to potential head-on accidents when drivers are coming westbound from the commercial parking lots. There have been no other negative responses to the operation from the merchants or the residents along 3rd Street. Conclusions: In brief, we believe the closure of Ocean View Avenue at "Lot 21" and retaining the barrier on 3rd Street would be a benefit to the residents in the area and is not detrimentally affecting the commercial activities adjacent to PCH. Further, the circulation and access to the Ocean View Avenue and 3rd Street area has not been adversely circuitous for the users with the closure and barrier. Attachments: Site Map Background Information Respectfully submitted, not available for signature Edward Ruzak City Traffic Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: 2 Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer !41 / ./ /I, / , / Step (g7- ' .: re City Manager F/B95 /per les/ccitems/3 rdst • h SITE LOCATION MAP Not To Scale S SITE LOCATION S • MJNICIPAL MATTERS The meeting recessed at the hour of 8:15 P.M. The meeting reconvened at the hour of 8:37 P.M. 4. INSTALLATION OF OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS ON THIRD STREET EAST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND OCEAN VIEW BETWEEN THIRD AND FOURTH STREETS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated August 4, 1998. Public Works Director Williams presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. Public participation opened at 8:52 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Janet Taranto - 906 Third Street, said that she did not believe the raised island on Ocean View Avenue would have the desired effect of reducing dangerous traffic; that she did like the concept of two-way traffic on lower Third Street and asked that lot 21 be closed for a six-month trial period; Nicole Libresco - 843 Fourth Street, said that she would really like a park on Lot 21, but asked that the intersection at least be closed on a trial basis; Ellen Murphy - 843 Third Street, said that cars speed up when they make an illegal turn; said that she had lost a dog due to an illegal driver; and said that a park would be an asset to the area; Gene Taranto - 906 Third Street, said that a raised island at the Ocean View Avenue intersection with Third Street would not affect the current traffic flow or stop wrong -way turns; asked the Council to consider the safety of the children in the area; Nicole Webb - 840 Third Street, said that the traffic was very dangerous in this area; Stacy Gleason - 916 Third Street, said that she had had a child hit on Third Street; and, Deb Scanlon - 915 Third Street, said that there was a lot more traffic and many more children now than in the past. Public participation closed at 9:13 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1. approve the installation of a raised barrier channelizing Third Street east of Pacific Coast Highway and converting Third Street from one-way to two-way between Pacific Coast Highway and 120 feet east of Pacific Coast Highway at a cost estimated at City Council Minutes 08-11-98 Page 9772 $2,000, and, noting that parking was not to be removed in this area; 2. install temporary barriers at the north and south end of the area known as Lot 21 on Ocean View, for a six-month evaluation period; and, 3. direct staff to explore the possibility of eventually closing the area permanently and creating a small park. Motion Reviczky, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL FOR CITY HOLIDAY DECORATION PROC.. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Ro dated August 5, 1998. unity Resources Director Mary Rooney prese'ted the sta f report and responded to Council questio s. City Mana• r Burrell also responded to Council ques ions. Coming forwa • to address the council on this i -m was: Jef (J.R.) Revinsky - Dekra- ite designer, splayed design sketches - d responded to Co ncil questions. Action: To ap 1. approve a h 2. direct staff ranging from $ 3. direct staff to ascending order) a) Pacific Coas Highway (PCH) lighted street banners at t •orth and south City entrances; b) white light= on .he palm trees in the downtown plaza; c) up to a 5 foot Chri tmas tree in the plaza; d) lighte' street b.• er at the Ardmore Aven -/Valley Drive/Pi-' Avenue intersection; e) li• ted street banner at the Pier Avenue/ A ation Blvd./PCH area; . d, f) =s money is available, to continue with decorations down Pier Avenue Motion ayor Edgerton, second Oakes. T motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. ove the staff reco endation to: liday decoration •rogram in concept; to return wi three potential budgets ,000 to $ ,000 to $40,000; and, ecogni e the Council priorities (in s: 6. ORD ANCE IMPLEMENTING STATUTORY PRERE•SISITES FOR LIv TED TORT LIABILITY IMMUNITY. Memo .ndum from P-rsonnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl d -ted August , 1998. Risk Manager Earl presented the staff repo and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to wave full reading and introduce Ordinance No. 98-118 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, City Council Minutes 08-11-98 Page 9773 • February 24, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999 PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVE COASTAL CONSERVATION ACT Recommendation Staff recommends that Council Members receive and file this report. Background At the February 23, 1999 meeting, Council directed the City Attorney and staff to examine the ballot initiative proposed by Donley Falkenstien that seeks to add regulations and restrict temporary events in the Coastal Zone and to establish coastal conservation requirements for the City. Analysis Attachment A outlines some of the potential impacts of items in this proposed ordinance. The grid identifies several issues of concern that in most part relate to one or more of the three core issues listed below: 1. The ambiguity of the language contained in the ordinance would make its interpretation, implementation, and enforcement extremely difficult and costly for the City. In short, it is complicated, confusing, and duplicitous. 2. The inclusion of the entire coastal zone with regards to the addition of substantial regulatory controls and associated costs for temporary events that could effect: (a) school, (b) charitable, and (c) civic events. 3. The fiscal impact of the proposed initiative to the City with regards to: (a) requirements related to storm water run-off, weekly testing programs, and the establishment of a non-profit research center; (b) the increased administrative costs and contract costs associated with extensive monitoring requirements for special events; and (c) the potential loss of general fund revenues with shifts of funds to storm water diversion and other programs required in the ordinance. 6 These core issues combined with the items in Attachment A outline staffs' preliminary concerns with the proposed ordinance. Staff will await any further direction from Council on this issue. Fiscal Impact: TBD Attachments Attachment A: Grid providing analysis of proposed ordinance. Attachment B: Coastal Zone and Preferential Parking District Boundary. Attachment C: Proposed Ballot Initiative. Respectfully submitted, Mary C. r o. fr Directo •, Community Resources _ Concur: Stephen ' rrell City Manager Proposed Initiative Petition Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Act REFERENCE ITEM IMPACT(S) /ISSUES FISCAL IMPACT(S) ENTIRE ORDINANCE COASTAL ZONE This ordinance would impact more than beach events. Some of the areas impacted include: 1. Hermosa Valley School 2. Clark Sports field 3. Hermosa Valley Park Potential fiscal impacts to non-profit organizations, the City, and school who would be subjected to costly monitoring (e.g., the proposed third party monitors), reduced ability to use advertisers to support programs, and extensive permit requirements. 4. South Park 5. Pier Plaza 6. Pier Avenue • Events that may be affected include: 1. Beach events 2. Community Sunset Concerts 3. Triathlon 4. Sand and Strand Race 5. CBVAVolleyball Tournaments ' 6. AAU Volleyball Tournaments 7. AAU Surf Competitions 8. Chevron Surf Camp 9. Project Touch Car Show 10. Saint Patrick's Day Parade 11. PTSA School Carnival 12. Spring Egg Hunt 13. Hermosa Beach Film Festival 14. Aloha Days Surf Contest & Festival 15. Fiesta De Las Aries 16. New Year's Eve Civic Celebrations 1 REFERENCE ITEM IMPACT(S) / ISSUES FISCAL IMPACT(S) SECTION 2.F No permanent commercial advertising City loses revenue credit for beach maintenance services for County advertising program. Additional funds from County or City to pay for beach maintenance services: $30,000 - $50,000 SECTION 2.G City shall provide funding, proportional to the City's responsibility for the diversion, within top ten priorities in the City budget each year...until sufficient facilities exist to effectively and substantially reduce polluted storm drain run-off into the ocean. Ambiguous. What does this mean? Who determines City's responsibility? What does "top ten priorities in the City budget" mean? How much is a "substantial reduction" in run-off. Who determines what a substantial reduction is? Potentially a huge budgetary impact 011 the City. A number cannot be estimated with any accuracy due to the ambiguity of the item. SECTION 2.G Year-round sea water quality testing — weekly City would be required to provide funds, additional administrative oversight, and contract administration. The provision may result in duplicated services as The Department of Health Services and LA County already conduct water quality testing. Unclear as to type of testing as water quality testing varies widely. LA County Department of Power and Water weekly water quality testing can be as high as $182,000 annually. , SECTION 2.H ...it is appropriate and necessary to dedicate all revenue except in-kind fees received by the City from all temporary events in the coastal zone into a "Coastal Conservation Fund." Therefore, all such revenues including, but not limited to permit fees, exclusive parking fees, filming fees and other sources of revenue derived directly from temporary events in the coastal zone shall be placed in a Coastal Conservation Fund only. Does this mean that revenues traditionally granted to charities from events in the Coastal Zone would be diverted to this fund? TBD 2 REFERENCE ITEM IMPACT(S) / ISSUES FISCAL IMPACT(S) SECTION 2.H Coastal Conservation Fund -- if such a non-profit marine research related facility is approved on the Hermosa Beach Pier it shall be the first priority for revenues from the Coastal Conservation fund. If a "non-profit marine research center" is approved, funds that were prioritized for the mandatory sea water testing, storm drain run-off, recreational equipment, and beach maintenance would now be re- prioritized for the marine research center? $64,000 reduction in general fund revenues. Substantial additional City subsidy would be required with the establishment of a marine research center. SECTION 17.76.060 (4) Monitoring of sound, parking lots, traffic conditions in the area of the event shall be performed by an independent third party. Who would direct the efforts of the third party? The City may be placed in a position of greater liability absent direct control and monitoring by City staff and the Police Department. Who hires the "independent" third party? Likely that the additional costs incurred for third party monitoring would effectively eliminate all but the largest scale commercial events. Non-profit events would not be able to absorb this additional cost. Estimate for professional monitoring services per event day: $3,000 SECTION 17.76.060 (5) No mechanical or electronic advertising device shall be allowed in the LRC -OS zone. Large events use electronic scoreboards and mechanical court borders to honor major sponsors. May discourage the large-scale events from coming to Hermosa, as they could not create a venue satisfactory '. for their purposes. SECTION 17.76.060 (5) Complaint logger at each event Requires administrative oversight by the City Manager. Would require City monitoring of many community events beyond City events (e.g., School events) to ensure that all events have someone in a central location to log complaints and to subsequently turn them into the City Manager. Cost of employee per day estimated at $200 Administrative oversight TBD SECTION 17.76.060 (7) No concurrent events (over 1,000) May adversely impact community events that are intentionally scheduled together and/or events that are complimentary such as: (a) Education Foundation Luau and Aloha Days, (b) Pancake Breakfast and Car Show, (c) IMG Tourney and Education Foundation Pro -Am Volleyball event and (d) volleyball tourney and community beach concerts. Lost revenues TBD. 3 REFERENCE ITEM IMPACT(S) /ISSUES FISCAL IMPACT(S) SECTION 17.76.060 (9) -. No sales of any kinds Effects the following events that sell official event items on the sandy beach: 1. Pro Volleyball 2. Surf Festival 3. Film Festival 4. AAU Youth Volleyball 5. Millenium Celebration SECTION 17.76.060 (11) All parking lots in the City's The City uses lots such as the Preferential Parking Program shall be protected from use by temporary events and shall not be used as off site mitigation lots for many events. Greenbelt for staging events and/or to minimize parking impacts at the beach lots. SECTION 17.76.060 (11) ..shall monitor each lot during events for which 1500 or more people are This single item has several impacts with serious operational and fiscal 1. Cost of monitoring 7 Lots estimated at $840 per day. expected too attend on any day, in order to determine the impact of each event on these lots. Lots found to be occupied ninety percent (90%) or greater by 9:55 a.m. during an event... shall require an attendant with specific instructions to park beachgoers and visitors to public facilities only. consequences: 1. There 4 preferential parking lots in the coastal zone making monitoring them expensive. 2. Who would determine if lots were 90% occupied and how could monitors be "on call" with such short notice? 3. How would these monitors determine who is parking for an event versus for other public uses? Surely the public would 2. Cost of additional Police for traffic control estimated at $1,800 per day (3 Officers). • "catch -on" to the restrictions and would soon be saying that they were just there to "go to the beach." 4. With monitors asking each vehicle why they were parking (and providing info on remote lots), traffic lanes would be "backed -up" at several areas in the City with resultant safety impacts. 4 REFERENCE ITEM IMPACT(S) / ISSUES FISCAL IMPACT(S) SECTION 17.76.060 (12b) __ ...each monitored item shall be documented...including, but not limited to: Logs, reports, photographs, video tape/film, printouts, public parking surveys and other documented proof. Would require substantial increase in staffing for events and in administrative costs to prepare these extensive reports. TBD SECTION 17.76.060 (12c) Monitoring shall be conducted by a qualified third party. 1. Who determines what a "qualified professional, independent third party" is? 2. Cost of professional monitoring and reporting would be prohibitive. TBD SECTION 17.76.060 (14) Comprehensive report Cost of professional monitoring and reporting would be substantial. TBD SECTION 17.76.060 (14) Failure to submit a Final Report within 40 calendar days of the conclusion of the event shall cause denial of all future permits for temporary events to the applicant and his or her authorized designee. How can an event operator be accountable for the actions of an "independent third party?' 5 REFERENCE ITEM IMPACT(S) / ISSUES FISCAL IMPACT(S) SECTION 17.76.060 (15) Required Park Use Permit or Coastal Development Permit May put non-profit, school and community events through an extensive bureaucratic process. TBD Would impact Community Development workload, potentially requiring additional staff. Events that may be impacted include: 1. Beach events 2. Community Sunset Concerts 3. Triathlon 4. Sand and Strand Race 5. CBVAVolleyball Tournaments 6. AAU Volleyball Tournaments 7. AAU Surf Competitions 8. Chevron Surf Camp 9. Project Touch Car Show 10. Saint Patrick's Day Parade (Booths Only) 11. PTSA School Carnival . 12. Spring Egg Hunt 13. Hermosa Beach Film Festival 14. Aloha Days Surf Contest & Festival 15. Fiesta De Las Artes 16. New Year's Eve Civic Celebrations 17. Pancake breakfast SECTION 17.76.060 (16) All temporary events not subject to the above Park Use Permit and or Not clear. Is the City prevented from requiring park use permits in the TBD Coastal Development Permit requirements shall be exempt from Coastal Zone for events of less than 500 people? Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development permit requirements... 6 REFERENCE ITEM IMPACT(S) / ISSUES FISCAL IMPACT(S) SECTION 17.76.060 (16b) The International Surf Festival operated by the Beach Cities Health District, pass through(s) and the Saint Patrick's Day Parade not including it's associated street vending, shall be the only temporary events exempt ... Does this mean that the City does not have the right to review permits for these activities? Saint Patrick's Day Parade would in practice not be exempted, as street vending is its primary source of income. SECTION 17.76.060 (16c) Community Development Director shall issue a Notice of Determination for each temporary event that is determined to be exempt from Park Use permit and or Coastal Development Permit requirements... at least sixty (60) days prior to the commencement of the proposed temporary event. This process may prevent small scale community events and fundraisers from happening due to the protracted process and to the 60 day required lead time. TBD SECTION 17.76.060 (18) The Director of Community Development shall inspect the temporary event during the monitoring and mitigation period for strict permit compliance during the event's highest attendance period and keep a detailed written record for the permanent file for the case. Would require extensive additional weekend and administrative work for the Community Development Director. TBD . SECTION 17.76.060 (19) Requirement for City Manager to maintain a web site. Extensive additional administrative work to maintain this level of detailed reporting on a web site and binder. Would likely require additional part time staff allocation. TBD SECTION 17.76.080 Application for temporary events requiring a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit shall be made to the Department of Community Development. Shifts the application process from the Department of Community Resources to Community Development. May require additional staffing. TBD SECTION 17.76.080(D) Posting notice of proposed event on the site. Visual blight on the beach and City Parks. 7 REFERENCE ITEM IMPACT(S) / ISSUES FISCAL IMPACT(S) SECTION 17.76.080(A) ...no more than 1000 square feet of advertisements. May discourage large scale events such as the Olympic Trials. Loss of events may have spillover impacts on local business. TBD SECTION 17.76.080 (8-22) This section contains requirements for the Communtiy Development Director to prepare extensive pre- and post event reports for events with more than 1,500 people and includes requirements for such as: 1. Mandatory radio spots. — including "all diverse ethnic and cultural Los Angeles radio markets and shall include Spanish language, youth and news stations. 2. Noticing on a 500' radius 3. Recycling facilities. This reporting would be in addition to the independent third party? This section contains items with such specific percentages and requirements as to make monitoring extremely costly and/or impractical. The costs attached to such extensive monitoring would most certainly be a great discouragement for charitable and community groups to conduct an event in the Coastal Zone. TBD SECTION 17.76.170(A) Every person, entity, corporation, or local Government Agency who violates permit application requirements is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding $1,000 or by imprisonment in the City or County jail for a term not exceeding 6 months... , . 8 t1 ngltaidc Dr -4 Aarningoldc Or M�}tint�nti.JV cALKIFOIEINIA d • • 4 •z. /1) • COASTAL ZONE BOUNDARY amit amist . Not amei ■ PREFERENTIAL PARKING DISTR• ICT B9iiNDARY PARKING METER LOCATIONS . (24-)i01TR YELLOW & 2-IIOZTR SILVER METERS) CITY OF HERMOSA 73EACH COIYINIIINIT-Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT t. Jot Ii686,011ipik# RESIDENTIAL ON -STREET PARKING (RESTRICTED 1-RO11R PUBLIC PARKING 10AM - 10PM) . _.... ::«:.�•::.� .._.�..�:�= :ter ..-..�.... 1140 Highland Ave, Suite 241 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (310) 372-0872 February 1, 1999 To: The City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, California NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE INITIATIVE PETITION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the persons whose names appear hereon of their intention to circulate the petition within the City of Hermosa Beach for the purpose of allowing the people to vote on an initiative measure which shall be known as, and may be cited as, 'The City of Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Act". A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows: (1) Protection and conservation of the public beach and ocean waters is critical to the long-term interests of the people of The City of.Hermosa Beach and all Californians. (2) Conserving the open space and natural resources of our beach protects the best known symbol of Hermosa Beach, and preserves the beach for enjoyment of future generations. . (3) Pollution of coastal waters, paid admission to temporary events on the beach, commercial sales on the beach, the lack of sufficient public notice thereof, and the excessive amount of temporary events in the coastal zone frustrates the purposes of protection of coastal resources, coastal access, and implementation of lona-term conservation planning measures required by the California Coastal Act, and is a negative precedent that represents a continuing threat to the beach in Hermosa Beach and other public beaches in cities along the entire California coast. Donley Falkenstien on behalf of himself and on behalf of the Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Committee. 1140 Highland Ave. Suite 241, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 REQUEST FOR BALLOT TITLE AND SUMMARY The undersigned hereby submit a request pursuant to Section 9203 of the Elections Code for a ballot title and summary of the initiative measure, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." The initiative measure is to be submitted to the voters of the City of Hermosa Beach for their adoption or rejection at the next succeeding municipal election or at any special election held prior to the municipal election or as otherwise provided by law. Donley Falkenstien on behalf of himself and on behalf of the Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Committee. • • INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS Exhibit "A" AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 17.030.020 AND ADDING CHAPTER 17.76 TO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE PROPOSED AMENDMENTTO THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COASTAL CONSERVATION ACT The people of the City of Hermosa Beach do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Title. This ordinance shall be known as, and may be cited as, "The City of Hermosa Beach Coastal Conservation Act." SECTION 2. Findings, Determinations and Declarations- The people of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby find, determine, and declare all of the following: (A) Protection and conservation of the public beach is critical to the long-term interests of the people of Hermosa Beach and all Californians. (B) Conserving the open space and natural resources of our beach protects the best known symbol of Hermosa Beach, -and preserves the beach for enjoyment of future generations. (C) Pollution of coastal waters, paid admission to temporary events on the beach, commercial sales on the beach, the lack of sufficient public notice thereof, and the excessive amount of temporary events in the coastal zone frustrates the California Coastal Act's purposes of protection of coastal resources and the implementation of long-term conservation planning measures and is a negative precedent that represents a continuing threat to the beach in Hermosa Beach and other public beaches in cities along the entire California coast. (D) Such temporary events in the coastal zone have the potential for negative impacts upon the following, including, but not limited to: Availability of public access parking opportunities, coastal views and scenic resources, the creation of unlimited temporary commercial advertising on the beach, the creation of litter on the beach and streets, degradation of sea water quality, . the creation of excessive noise incompatible with surrounding residential and commercial properties, wildlife, increased traffic congestion and gridlock, increased pedestrian congestion, and the overuse of natural resource areas. (E) Permanent commercial advertising on the beach frustrates the Coastal Act's purpose to reserve coastal views and scenic resources, and its requirements for implementation of long-term conservation planning measures. (F) Therefore the People of the City of Hermosa Beach declare that with the exception of minor participant entry fees such as team participant entry fees, no admission may be charged to any part of the public beach for any reason, including, but not limited to: Temporary events or parts thereof; that no permanent commercial advertising shall be allowed on the sandy beach area, including, but not limited to: Trash cans, tide charts, lifeguard facilities, recreational facilities, and all other public facilities located on the beach; temporary events in the coastal zone shall be limited, strictly controlled, permits strictly enforced, and subjected to comprehensive monitoring in order to limit and quantitatively and qualitatively analjrze the impacts on the following, including, but not limited to: Coastal access parking opportunities, temporary. commercial advertising on the beach, coastal views and scenic resources, the overuse of natural resource areas, increased pedestrian and traffic congestion, creation of excessive noise, and the creation of exhaust fumes from generators, and shall mandate adequate and comprehensive mitigation measures in order to reduce all negative impacts to a level of insignificance. (G) The People of The City of Hermosa Beach further declare that the City shall promote a minimum of four (4) community beach clean-up days during the period May 1 through Sept. 30 each year; shall provide funding, proportional to the City's responsibility, for the diversion of all storm -drain run-off generated within the city, within the top ten priontres in the city budget each yea; with the exception of each year in which a recession has been declared by the Governor of . California, until sufficient facilities exist to . effectively and substantially reduce polluted storm drain runoff- into the ocean; shall ensure year- round sea -water -quality testing is performed weekly and; -shall install and maintain a public notice board at the foot of, or adjacent to the Hermosa Beach Pier for posting notices, including, but limited to: Public notices of proposed temporary events in the coastal zone, local coastal environmental awareness issues and sea water quality testing results. Such notice board shall be no smaller than four (4) feet wide by four (4) feet tall, and shall be operational within ten (10) days of the completion of the Hermosa Beach Pier renovation, or within 90 days of effectivity, whichever comes first. (H) The People of The Gty of Hermosa Beach further declare that in order to pay for long-range conservation measures to protect our open space beach, it is appropriate and necessary to dedicate all revenue except in-kind fees received by the Gty from all temporary events in the coastal zone into a "Coastal Conservation Fund." Therefore, all such revenues, including. but not limited to: Permit fees, exclusive use parking fees, filming fees and other sources of revenue derived directly from temporary events in the coastal zone shall be placed in the Coastal Conservation Fund only. The first priority for Coastal Conservation Fund expenditure shall be one-time compensation for the expedited, permanent, and complete elimination of all permanent commercial advertising located on beach trash cans, tide charts, lifeguard facilities, recreational facilities and all other public facilities located on the beach. Specifically, the agreement with the County of Los Angeles which provides for permanent commercial advertising on beach facilities in -lieu of direct payment for maintenance services. Once all permanent commercial advertising has been eliminated pursuant to this act, all remaining and future Coastal Conservation Fund revenues shall first be used to ensure year-round weekly sea water quality testing and secondly to establish, enhance and maintain Gty of Hermosa Beach provided permanent recreational equipment on the beach and thirdly shall be used to provide beach maintenance. Any remaining Coastal Conservation Fund revenues shall be used to help fund the diversion of city storm -drain run-off and to help provide for the establishment and maintenance of a non-profit marine research related facility which may be developed on the Hermosa Beach Piet If such a non-profit marine research related facility is approved on the Hermosa Beach Pier it shall be the first priority for revenues from the Coastal Conservation Fund. All permanent corjnercial advertising as identified • Page 1 of 6 herein shall be removed in their entirety by no later than June 1, 2000, or within one hundred eighty (180) days of effectivity, which ever comes first.. Current or future revenues in the Coastal Conservation Fund shall not be borrowed or loaned for any reason. Only permanent commercial advertising on County of Los Angeles Lifeguard and maintenance vehicles shall be exempted. excluded, or otherwise waived from the provisions of this act. There shall be no new or expanded permanent commercial advertising located in the LRC -OS zone. (I) The People of The City of Hermosa Beach further declare that the actions of a prevailing party in an action brought to enforce the provisions of this act have resulted in a significant public benefit. (J) The City of Hermosa Beach has an amended Land Use Plan certified by the California Coastal Commission. (K) The City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code and certified Land Use Plan does not provide adequate controls for the review -or management of temporary events in the coastal zone. (L) Therefore, the People .of Hermosa Beach declare that the procedures and standards established by this initiative will provide adequate measures to establish sufficient public notice, and reduce and limit the extent of the potential negative impacts of temporary events to a level of insignificance. A Local Coastal Program proposed by the Gty of Hermosa Beach shall incorporate the provisions and intent of this act without modification by the City (M) The People of the City of Hermosa Beach further declare that the city shall implement the following land use plan policies: POLICY: 1.A. The city shall maximize the opportunities for using available parking for weekend beach use. POLICY: 1.B. The city shall protect on -street parking spaces in the coastal zone which are available to the general public whenever possible and ensure the replacement of such eliminated on - street parking spaces on a one-to-one basis within the city of Hermosa Beach coastal zone within one year. SECTION 3. Purpose and Intent- The purpose and intent of this act is to monitor; preserve and protect the coastal resources within Hermosa Beach, increase public notice, limit the power of the city to expand temporary event commercial development in the coastal zone without voter approval, and to implement and carry out the provisions as identified herein consistent with the Land Use Plan policies, California Coastal Act and the California Code of Regulations. Nothing in this act shall be interpreted to mean the City shall have authority to commence Coastal Development Permitting authority unless, and until, the city has a certified Local Coastal Program, or; that the People of The City of Hermosa Beach support construction of any new parking structures in the downtown area, or, to limit in any way the ability of the city to react in an emergency, or; to limit in any way the application or enforcement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Gty of Hermosa Beach Municipal Zoning Code is subject to the following modifications to read: (A) Modify Chapter 17 Section 17.030.020 ZONING ("Open Space Zone: Permitted Uses") by DELETING Section (a) and REPLACING it with the following: (a) Public and private parks, not including the beach; (B) Chapter 17 ("ZONING") is hereby amended to add a new zone designated as Long Range Conservation Open Space LRC -OS, Restricted Open Space as follows: Section. 17.76 Long Range Conservation Open Space LRC -OS Section 17.76.010 Purpose and intent. The LRC -OS zone/land use designation is intended to preserve publicly -owned shoreline and sandy beach areas as an open space natural resource subject to long range conservation planning measures, while allowing for passive and active. recreational activities, encouraging increasing public access parking opportunities, and preserving the unique character of Hermosa Beach's oceanfront, coastal resources, public views, and access to coastal resources. Section 17.76.020 Permitted uses. Activities in the LRC -OS zone shall range from passive recreational uses such as_ walking to more intensive, active recreational and cultural uses consistent with the provisions of this act. Section 17.76.030 Improvements permitted. Improvements permitted in the LRC -OS zone shall be as follows: (A) Only non -permanent structures, play equipment, volleyball courts, and softscape shall be permi tted. (B) Only non -building public improvements, benches, currently planned or existing public facilities and utilities, erosion and restoration improvements and incidental public service purposes, including: but not limited to: Burying cables and pipes or inspection and maintenance of the pier or intake and outfall lines shall be permi tted. Section 17.76.040 Area designated. The public sandy beach from the northerly Gty boundary to the southerly City boundary and from the Strand wall and concrete path to the mean tide line shall be designated and zoned LRC -OS. The LRC -OS zone may not be combined with any other zones that lie within the coastal zone or any overlay district. In the LRC -OS zone the standards in this act shall take precedent over other standards in the zoning code. The standards in this act shall be applied in a manner which is most productive of public access and coastal resources. Section 17.76.050 Definitions. "Applicant" for the purposes of this act, means any person or his or her authorized representative, entity, corporation or Local Government Agency who applies for; or who is required to apply for; a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit for a temporary event in the coastal zone; "City" or "City Council" means the Gty or Gty Council of The Gty of Hermosa Beach, California; "Coastal resources" include, but arc not limited to, the sandy beach, public access parking opportunities, visitor and recreation facilities, coastal views and scenic resources, water -oriented events, marine resources, biological resources, and environmentally sensitive habitat areas; "Commercial development" for the purposes of this act means a project that involves the exclusive use of coastal resources for a limited duration and or proposes the use of non -permanent structures and or temporary commercial advertising on or above the beach m excess of one hundred square feet, or, a project that includes permanent commercial advertising in the LRC -OS zone; "Cumulatively" or "cumulative effect" means the incremental effects of an individual project when reviewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects; "Event -dependent vehicle(s)" means any motor vehicle or trailer that requires on-site parking in order for the event to function at all; "Exclusive use" means a use that precludes use of the area occupied by the event, for public recreation, beach access or access to coastal waters other than for or through the event itself; "Limited duration" means a period of time which does not exceed an eight day period on a continual basis, including setting up and removing all materials associated with an activity at a site and restoring the site to its preexisting condition, or does not exceed a consecutive four month period on an intermittent basis; "Non -permanent structures" -include, - but are not limited to bleachers, perimeter fencing, vendor tents/canopies, judging stands, trailers, portable toilets, sound/video equipment, stages, platforms, movie/film sets, etc., which do not involve grading or landform alteration for installation, with the exception of sand berms in replacement of bleachers; "Pass through(s)" means only those functions in which pedestrians or bicyclists originate outside Hermosa Beach and pass thru the city enroute to a • designated location outside Hermosa Beach such as a walkathon; "Permittee"for the purposes of this act, means any person or his or her authorized representative, entity, corporation or Local Government Agency who receives approval for a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit for a temporary event in the coastal zone; "Sandy beach area" or "Beach" includes publicly owned sandy beach areas fronting on coastal waters, regardless of the existence of potential prescriptive rights or a public trust interest; Shall" means mandatory; "Temporary commercial advertisement(s)" means the total visible surface(s) of any and all material displayed at and or associated with a temporary event that contains a logo, visual display, or written announcement of a product, service or organization that is sold or operates primarily for profit, which is lager than one (I) square foot, with the exception of: the actual product itself. event -dependent vehicles, umbrellas, chairs, towels and temporary play equipment such as nets and balls. In the case of vehicles on display, it shall mean the entire visible envelope surface of each vehicle. All other commercial advertisement(s) in the LRC -OS zone shall be considered "permanent commercial advertisement(s)" for the purposes of this act and; "Temporary event(s)" or Events)"means an event or function of limited duration, including set- up and take-down and restoring the site to its preexisting condition, which includes the use of non -permanent structures that involves development within the meaning of the California Coastal Act, including, but not limited to: Exclusive use of a sandy beach, parkland, pier, filled tidelands, water: streets, sidewalks, bicycle path, or parking area or a portion thereof, which is otherwise open and available for general public use. Section 17.76.060 Temporary events - Regulations. (A) Temporary events within the City of Hermosa Beach coastal zone shall be subject to the following regulations. (1) The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission or its successor shalt review each proposed temporary event for which a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit is required on an event -by - event basis consistent with the procedures set forth in this act at a duly noticed public hearing, and make recommendations to the City Council for denial or approval as proposed, or as modified at a duly noticed public hearing. Page 2of6 (2) Priority shall be given to temporary events that require the coast in order to function at all. such as surfing events. (3) The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and the City Council shalt not consider a permit for a period of three (3) years from the date of application for any temporary event whose applicant or responsible party has performed any of the following: (a) Failed to mitigate all impacts from the same or substantially similar previous temporary event in the coastal zone to a level of insignificance upon completion of the mitigation and monitoring program including extensions, if any; (b) Commenced development of a temporary event in the coastal zone without a valid permit issued as required pursuant to this ordinance. (4) Temporary events held on the beach whose primary function is live amplified music shall be treated generically without regard to the applicant's identity and the city shall be the responsible party for compliance to mitigation conditions of the permit. Monitoring of sound, off-' site mitigation parking lots and traffic conditions in the area of the event shall be performed by an independent third party. (5) Temporary commercial advertising in the LRC -OS zone must be associated with a current temporary event and shall be attached to a structure and shall not be set on the sand or attached to any recreational facility on the beach in such a way as to replace the recreational facility primarily for commercial purposes. No mechanical or electronic advertising device shall be allowed in the LRC -OS zone. (6) Each proposed event with an expected or known attendance of 500 or more participants and spectators on any day shall have at least one person available at all times in an identified central location to answer questions and log and respond to complaints. The original log shall be signed by the applicant and provided to the city manager and included in the permanent record in an expedited mannec (7) Temporary events in the coastal zone with an expected or known attendance of 1000 or more participants and spectators on any day shall not be combined or held concurrently. (8) Temporary events held on the beach shall not provide for areas which are exclusive access or VIPareas except for documented security reasons. (9) No sales of arty kind shall be allowed on the sandy beach, with the exception of constitutionally protected materials only, with specific approval. (10) The applicant shall be given a copy of, be responsible to know the contents thereof, and comply with the Hermosa Beach noise ordinance as applicable. (11) Alt parking Tots in the City's Preferential Parking Program shall be protected from use by temporary events, and shall not be used as off-site parking mitigation lots for any events. The Gty shall provide for the posting of signs in these lots which discourage exclusive event parking at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance and shall monitor each lot during events for which 1500 or more people are expected to attend on any day, in order to determine the impact of each event on these lots. Lots found to be occupied ninety percent (90%) or greater by 9:55 a.m. during an event on weekend days or holiday days shall require an attendant with specific instructions to park beachgoers and visitors to public facilities only. Information shall be provided to direct event patrons to the remote lots. Any exception from this requirement shall require California Coastal Commission approval. (12) Temporary events in the coastal zone during the period of May 1 through September 30 with an expected or known attendance of 1500 or more participants and spectators on any day which occur during weekend days and or holiday days shall be subjected to comprehensive monitoring as follows: (a) A comprehensive monitoring program shall be established to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the impacts of each proposed temporary event on the following, including, but not limited to: Coastal access parking opportunities, coastal views and scenic resources, temporary commercial advertising in the LRC -OS zone, the overuse of natural resource areas, increased pedestrian congestion, increased traffic congestion, parking impacts on residents and businesses, creation of excessive noise, and exhaust fumes from generators, and shall direct mandatory comprehensive mitigation measures for each event, including subsequent events, to reduce all negative impacts to a level of insignificance. (b) The monitoring shall be conducted each weekend and or holiday during the event for the first three occurrences of an event in order to determine if the impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance, or upon a finding of cause by the City Council, which shall be set forth in full in a resolution, may be extended on an event -to - event basis for a maximum of two (2) events or two (2) calendar years thereafter, whichever comes first, in order to determine if the impacts can be specifically found by the City Council, based on the evidence submitted, to have been reduced to a level of insignificance, and shall be set forth in full in a resolution. Each monitored item shall be documented as clearly as possible, including, but not limited to: Logs, reports, photographs, video tape/film, printouts, public parking surveys and other documented proof. The monitoring shall include a program which determines the actual number of attendees who require parking in order to attend the event. Events whose monitoring proves less off-site parking is required may beadjusted to more accurately reflect the actual parking requirement. Limited monitoring shall continue in perpetuity to ensure compliance with off-site parking -usage permit conditions which reduce negative parking impacts to a level of insignificance. (c) Monitoring of traffic conditions in the area of the event and of each off-site parking lot usage shall be conducted by a qualified professional independent third party. (d) Temporary event applicants or responsible parties who have failed to mitigate all impacts to a level of insignificance during the mitigation and monitoring program, including extensions if any, and have not applied for a permit for a temporary event in the coastal zone during the last three (3) years, not withstanding any other provision of this act, may be considered for a permit provided that the applicant or responsible party agrees in writing to a one (I) time mitigation and monitoring program, and understands and agrees that no further permits shall be issued for the event, or substantially similar event, or the applicant or responsible party, if all impacts are not mitigated to a level of insignificance. (13) Temporary events in the coastal zone shall comply with all findings as provided for in Section 17.76.080 Findings - Temporary Events. (14) Temporary events in the coastal zone occurring during the period of May 1 through September 30 shall require a written post -event final comprehensive report ("Final Report") in the form of an affidavit attesting to the truth, accuracy and completeness of the information contained therein, submitted within thirty (30) calendar days of the conclusion of the event, which shall include, but not be limited to: the permit conditions and all aspects of compliance with each condition, peak attendance times and number of attendees, off-site parking utilization,ttraffic conditions in the area of the event, radio scripts including quantity, date and time of airing, locations of professionally printed signs directing traffic, and event temporary commercial advertising documentation. Failure to submit a Final Report within forty (40) calendar days of the conclusion of the event shall cause denial of all future permits for temporary events to the applicant and his or her authorized designee. (15) A Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit shall be required for temporary events in the coastal zonefor which any one of the following apply: (a) A temporary event with an anticipated or known total attendance of 500 or more participants and spectators between the hours of 9:30 am and 7:00 p.m. on any day: (b) A temporary event which involves the closure or exclusive use of more than 20 public parking spaces in the coastal zone, or involves the issuance of more than 20 temporary parking passes for use of public parking spaces in the coastal zone. (c) A temporary event which involves the closure of the Hermosa Beach Pier to the general public. (d) A temporary event of which any part is held on a beach area which proposes the display of temporary commercial advertisement in excess of one hundred (100) square feet on or above the beach. (e) A temporary event held on a sandy beach area, which exceeds 48 hours in duration including set-up and take-down and restoring the site to its preexisting condition. (f) A temporary event, which in conjunction with other planned or approved temporary events on the same day, would cause the closure of any public parking lots in the coastal zone, the closure of the Hermosa Beach Pier, the closure or exclusive use of more than 20 public parking spaces in the coastal zone, or cumulatively create anticipated or known attendance of 500 or more participants and spectators between the hours of 9:30 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on any day. (g) A temporary event that proposes live amplified music on the beach. (16) All temporary events not subject to the above Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit requirements shall be exempt from Park Use Pemut and or Coastal Development Permit requirements, with the following exceptions: . (a) The Director of Community Development shall require a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit for those temporary events which have the potential to directly or indirectly impact the following: coastal access parking opportunities; coastal views and scenic resources; coastal resources; environmentally sensitive resources; and rare or endangered species. (b) The International Surf Festival operated by the Beach Cities Health District, pass through(s) and the Saint Patricks Day Parade not including it's associated street vending, shall be the only temporary events exempted, excluded, or otherwise waived from obtaining a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit, provided that the event does not propose temporary commercial advertisement(s) exceeding one thousand (1000) square feet on and or above the beach, and is operated in a mariner consistent with the 1998 event and with the provisions, policies and standards of this act, the Land Use Plan and or Local Coastal Program adopted by the City. This section shall not affect the application of use fees. (c) The Director of Community Development shall issue a Notice of Determination for each temporary event which is determined to be exempt from Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit requirements under Section 17.76.060.A.16. On the day that the Notice of Determination is issued, it shall be posted in the calendar or binder and website required by Section 17.76.060.A.19, and a copy shall be sent to the California Coastal Commission office at least sixty (60) days prior to commencement of the proposed temporary event. Unless a challenge is received in the Community Development Directors office pursuant to Section 17.76.100 within ten (10) city hall working days of receipt by the California Coastal Commission office, the determination shall be deemed final. (17) Park Use Permits and or Coastal Development Permits for temporary events issued Page 3 of 6 pursuant to this act shall be subject to and processed in conformance with CEQA all applicable policies and provisions set forth in this act and the policies and provisions of the Land Use Plan and or Local Coastal Program. The calendar or binder and website required by Section 17.76.060.A.19 shall be used to track all temporary events. (18) The Director of Community Development shall inspect the temporary event during the monitoring and mitigation period for strict permit compliance during the event's highest attendance period and keep a detailed written record for the permanent files of the case. Any deviation from the approved permit must be in writing and reviewed and approved prior to commencement by the Director of Community Development and shall be minor in nature. The Director of -Community Development or his or her designee shall create a user-friendly guide designed to help applicants and others understand and utilize the temporary event permitting process. (19) The City Manager or his or her designee shall keep a calendar or binder and electronic website continuously on the computer intemet/world wide web for public review that describes the location, duration, and number of participants and attendees of all approved temporary events and all events that have been proposed. The calendar or binder and website shall provide for electronic mail, phone numbers and addresses for correspondence, and shall contain summaries of all complaints, Coastal Conservation Fund balances, indicating where the revenue has been spent each year and to date, a list of the total square footage of .temporary commercial advertising allowed on the beach individually and cumulatively from events each year, all relevant reports and photographs, and all Notices of Determinations (exemptions) and Park Use Permits and or Coastal Development Permits issued for all temporary events during the preceding 24 months. In addition, the City Manager or his/her designee shallplace in the calendar or binder and website within two (2) working days of receipt from the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors, all copies of applications for Beach/Harbor Use Permits forwarded by the County. In addition to the website, the calendar or binder shall be available for immediate public review at a public counter in City Hall and or in the public Library during normal business hours without having to submit a Request for Public Records Form or any other form. Section 17.76.070 Standard Conditions. (A) The following standard conditions shall be applied to all applications and Park Use Permits and or Coastal Development Permits for temporary events held in the coastal zone: (1) NOTICE OF RECUIF'l AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Community Development Department at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to commencement of development Late submittal will result in denial of permit issuance. (2) EXPIRATION. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire on the last day of the approved Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit temporary event date. (3) COMPLIANCE. All development must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth in the application for permit, subject to any special conditions set forth in the permit Any deviation from the approved permit must be in writing and reviewed and approved prior to commencement by the Director of Community Development. (4) INTERPRETATION. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved in writing by the Community Development Director. (5) INSPECTION. The Community Development Director shall be allowed to inspect the site for permit compliance. (6) ASSIGNMENT. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Gty an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. Section 17.76.080 Application Requirements - Temporary Events. Application for temporary events requiring a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit shall be made to the Department of Community Development on forms provided by the Director of Community Development. The application for a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit shall be accompanied by: (A) A complete description of the proposed temporary event. including, but not limited to: (1) The proposed dates and hours of operation of the proposed temporary event, including set-up and take-down and restoring the site to its preexisting condition; (2) The estimated or known daily and total attendance at the proposed temporary event, including event organizers, sponsors, participants and spectators. Include materials or procedures used to determine the estimated and or actual attendance figures, such as serialized wrist bands, questionnaires, surveys or records and photographs of prior events; _ (3) A parking and traffic control plan and a description of the measures proposed to mitigate the proposed temporary event's impact on traffic circulation in the arca of the event and on the public parking supply in the coastal zone to a level of insignificance; (4) Adescription of the impact of amplified sound from the proposed temporary event. The submittal shall include a description of the measures proposed to mitigate the potential impact to a level of insignificance; (5) A description of all events ancillary to the proposed temporary event, and/or "pre -events" or "post -events"; (6) A description of the location of the proposed temporary event. the amount of sandy beach area to be used, the number of public parking spaces in the coastal zone to be occupied or used, and a description of ingress and egress to the Pier and the adjacent areas; (7) A description of any other potential negative impacts from the proposed temporary event on residents and businesses and a description of the measures proposed to mitigate the potential negative impacts to a level of insignificance; (8) Adescription of any potential impacts from the proposed temporary event on public services and a description of the measures to mitigate these potential impacts to a level of insignificance; (9) A description of any other potential negative impacts from the proposed temporary event on residents and businesses and a description of the measures proposed to mitigate these potential impacts to a level of insignificance; (10) A description of any potential impacts from the proposed temporary event on the general public's ability to access the beach, Pier, bicycle path, public parking, public streets, sidewalks, walkstreets, volleyball courts, and or other access support facilities which may be identified in the Land Use Plan and or Local Coastal Program. The submittal shall include a description of the measures proposed to mitigate these potential impacts to a level of insignificance; (11) Adescription of the daily total square footage of temporary canunercial advertising proposed and its locations. Temporary commercial advertising shall be minimizeri. (12) A vicinity map, site plan and elevations showing the location of the proposed temporary event in relation to the Pier, bicycle path, surf zone, public parking facilities, vertical beach accessways, and recreation facilities. The site plan and elevations shall describe and identify the size, maximum height from sand surface at the mean high tide line and location of all objects proposcd to be placed at the site of the proposed temporary event, including. but not limited to: Fences, structures, barriers, bleachers, seating areas, activity areas, tents, booths, canopies, vendors, stages, judging stands, platforms, sets, sound equipment, vehicles, trailers, generators, toilets and temporary commercial advertisements. The site plan shall also indicate whether any existing objects are proposed to be altered or removed from their current location. Generator use shall be minimized. (13) Address labels supplied by the Gty for all interested parties. and all property owners. residents, tenants, lessees, and businesses within a 500 foot radius of the parcel on which the event is proposed, or within a 500 foot radius of the maximum extent of the proposed temporary event site, whichever results in a greater area. (D) Evidence that the applicant has posted a notice in a conspicuous location at the site of the proposed event that clearly stated the applicant's intent to apply for a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit for a temporary event. The posted notice shall contain a description of sufficient detail of the proposed temporary event,. including, but not limited to: Proposed location and. activities, dates and times including set-up and tear -down and restoring the site to its preexisting condition, ekpected or known attendance, and off- site parking and transportation accommodations. (E) The required application fee. (F) Any additional information determined by the Director of Community Development to be necessary for the evaluation of the proposed event. (G) A dated signature by or on behalf of each of the applicant's, attesting to the truth. completeness, and accuracy of the contents of the application, and if the signer is not the applicant, written evidence that the signer is authorized to act as the applicant's representative. Section 17.76.080 Findings - Temporary ..Events. All City Council decisions on Park Use Permits and or Coastal Development Permits for temporary events in the coastal zone shall be accompanied by written findings. APark Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit for a temporary event shall be approved either as applied for, or as modified, only if all the following applicable findings can be specifically supported: (A) The staging of this temporary event will not result in more than one thousand (1000) total square feet of commercial advertising on the beach or suspended above the beach by any means, and the applicant and his or her commercial sponsors has agreed in writing, which is on file with the city, to not provide for any aerial (aircraft) banner advertising during the event; (B)If the event's primary location is not located on the sandy beach, no temporary commercial advertising is proposed to be located in the LRC - OS zone; (C) The temporary event, as described in the application and accompanying materials, as modified by any conditions of approval, conforms with this act, the Land Use Plan policies, and or Local Coastal Program; (D) The temporary event, as described in the application and accompanying materials, as modified by any conditions of approval, is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976 commencing with Section 30200 of the Public Resources Code and CEQA, and specifically; (1) The applicant or his or her authorized representative has signed his or her name indicating he or she has been given a copy of this act and that he or she understands and agrees to its terms and conditions, a copy of which is on file with the Gty; (2) The event does not physically block or prohibit access to the shoreline, vertical beach accessways, Pier, or bicycle path by the general Page 4 of 6 public or impose conditions on the public for access to the same. A specific requirement for a minimum fifteen (15) foot wide access way to the Pier is included in the Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit as a condition of approval; (3) The event includes a parking plan which minimizes exclusive use of public parking spaces in the coastal zone by allowing the exclusive use of public parking spaces in the coastal zone for event -dependent vehicles only and requires event/vendor vehicles to preserve the most convenient off-site parking lot spaces for event patrons. Aspecific description of the parking plan as included in the Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit as a condition of approval; (4) The temporary event, including alt set-up and take-down days and restoring the site to its preexisting condition, does not exceed an eight (8) day period, and set-up and take-down time is minimized; (5) If the event requires the use of more than 20 public parking spaces in the coastal zone, the parking spaces are replaced at a minimum one-to- one ratio in off-site parking Tots open for use by the general public, and adequate free transportation capacity during peak event and beach access hours is provided between the replacement parking spaces and the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Pier Avenue or other locations as necessary to assure that the off-site parking effectively serves event and public beach access, and off-site parking usage is maximized and measured. A specific description of the replacement parking and transportation program and is included in the Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit as a condition of approval; (6) If the expected or known attendance of the event equals or exceeds 500 persons between the hours of 9:30 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.. on any day; measures to effectively serve beach access are provided, including.•but not limited to: Previous Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit requirements, valid lease or licensing agreements for sufficient alternate off-site free parking at a minimum of one space for every three people in excess of 500 persons, a free beach shuttle service, and an interim traffic control plan. Such measures shall be adequately publicized by requiring use of the City's street banner facilities on Pacific Coast Highway and Pier Avenue and other locations as may be necessary to direct traffic to the off-site parking. If the expected or known attendance of the event and or concurrent events equals or exceeds 1500 persons between the hours of 9:30 am and 7:00 p.m. on any day, the permit also requires use of alt other city street banner facilities to direct traffic to the off-site parking, signs, radio and other measures required by this act, the Community Development Director, the Gty Council or the California Coastal Commission. Events whose monitoring proves to a reasonable certainty that more. or fess, off-site parking is required, may be adjusted to more accurately reflect the actual parking requirement. All methods of advertising the event shall specifically state in large block letters no smaller that the lagest type used, that there is no spectator parking at the event, and indicates the location of all off-site parking with free handicap -accessible beach shuttle service available to the general public and the headway time. A specific description of the measures to be used are included in the Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit as conditions of approval; (7) The cumulative effects of the event, in conjunction with other past, concurrent, or future planned temporary events, or other future temporary events that could be reasonably known to occur during the period commencing May.1 and ending through September 30, will not result in any temporary events which require a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit occurring in the coastal zone on the weekend, spaced less than two (2) weekends between events, or during more than two (2) of the three (3) peak holiday coastal access periods of Memorial Day weekend, the July 4th weekend or weekdays as observed, and the Labor Day weekend through Monday, and will not result in back-to-back weekend temporary events, nor provide for any repeat weekend temporary events during the period. and will not result in any temporary events occurring in the coastal zone on the weekend, spaced less than three (3) weekends between events, during the rest of the calendar year; (8) The permit requires an applicant signed Final Report on a form provided by the Community Development Department which shall be filed with the Community Development Department no later than thirty (30) calendar days from the conclusion of a temporary event, and shall include, but not be limited to: Documented usage of off-site parking spaces indicating total number of vehicles parked per day and the number expected, total number of shuttles departing the lot(s) per day, shuttle departure times, number of passengers each, and total number of passengers per day; the location, size, quantity and content of professionally produced signs and banners directing the public to the off-site parking Tots and for traffic control; number of spectators and participants per day and total for the event; actual total square feet of temporary commercial advertising displayed including photographs of each different temporary commercial advertisement indicating their square footage and quantities of each for each day; traffic conditions in the area of the event, and all other aspects of permit compliance. A specific description of the measures to be used are included in the Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit as conditions of approval; (9) If the temporary event is expected or known to have 1,500 or more spectators and participants between the hours of 9:30 a.m. and 7:00 p.m on any day. the applicant additionally provides a valid agreement with a shuttle operator, shuttle routes and operating schedule to provide such a shuttle service during the event as follows: the shuttle service shall run continuously on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.; the "headway" time between shuttle service pick-ups shall not be more than fifteen (15) minutes; and the free shuttle service is available and identified as for the general public, handicap and event spectators. Specifically, the shuttle service provides for adequate transportation capacity during combined peak event and beach access hours; (10) If the temporary event is expected or known to have 1,500 or more spectators and participants between the hours of 930 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on any day, additional measures are required which provide for recycling facilities; a method to determine the actual number of attendees requiring parking in order to attend the event; and provides for a minimum utilization requirement of forty (40) percent of the off-site parking mitigation spaces required during the first event approved pursuant to this act, increasing by an amount to be determined by the Gty Council but not less than a minimum of ten (10) percent for each event thereafter to a minimum of seventy (70) percent utilization by the completion of the monitoring and mitigation program not including extensions regardless of changes to the minimum off-site parking mitigation spaces required. Radio notices informing the public of alternate parking and transportation will be aired a minimum of one day prior to the weekend event date during commuter hours and once' pn hour during the event on weekends and or holidays between minimum hours of 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. and shall represent all diverse ethnic and cultural Los Angeles radio markets and shall include Spanish language, youth and news stations. Aspecific description of the measures to be used are included in the Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit as conditions of approval; (11) A true, correct and complete copy of all information regarding the current and past events conducted by the applicant within the last two (2) years or two (2) events, which is on file with the Gty, including. but not limited to: The permanent case files, all Final Reports with all attachments and exhibits has been presented for public review during each hearing; (12) The Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit requires strict compliance with permit requirements and standard conditions as conditions of approval; (13) Nothing is proposed to be offered for sale on the sandy beach, with the exception of constitutionally protected materials with specific approval; (14) If the temporary event is on the beach and its primary function is live amplified music, the city accepts primary responsibility for compliance to permit mitigation conditions. Additionally. amplified sound is measured by a qualified professional independent third party during the monitoring and mitigation period; (15) If the temporary event is expected or known to have 1,500 or more spectators and participants on any day, notice of an application for a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit has been published in a local newspaper of general circulation; ' (16) Amplified sound equipment is directed opposite the residential and commercial properties; (17) Notice has been given to all addresses within a 500 foot radius of the parcel on which the event is proposed, or within a 500 foot radius of the maximum extent of the proposed temporary event site, whichever results in a greater area, at least 10 working days prior to the first scheduled public hearing: (18) The proposed temporary event has been reviewed by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission consistent with the procedures set forth in this act at a duly noticed public hearing; (19) The replacement parking does not include any parking Tots that provide Tong -term beach and public facility parking during the facilities regular business hours, or are included in any preferential parking program; (20) If the initial monitoring and mitigation period has been completed, all impacts from the applicants prior temporary event have .been found, based on the evidence submitted, to have been reduced to a level of insignificance; (21) The proposed temporary event is not the same or substantially similar event conducted by the applicant within the last three (3) years which failed to mitigate its impacts to a level of insignificance upon completion of the monitoring and mitigation period including extensions, if any; (22)If tobacco and or alcohol temporary commercial advertising is proposed; it is in the best interest of the general public (Effective January 1, 2002 and thereafter); (D) All feasible mitigation measures and conditions to the Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit have been adopted to reduce any adverse impacts of the proposed event to a level of insignificance. Section 17.76.090 Acceptance of terms. (A) The Community Development Director shall receive a copy of the Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit signed by the permittee or his or her authorized representative, agreeing to the terms and conditions of the permit at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to commencement of development. (B) Failure of the permittee to submit a signed Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development pursuant to Section 17.76.090.A shall cause the permit to automatically become invalid. Section 17.76.100 City Council action final. Page 5 of 6 (A) The action of the Gty in denying an application for a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit for a temporary event shall be final and conclusive, and may not be appealed to the Gty. (B) The action of the Gty in approving an application for a temporary event Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit or issuing a Notice of Determination for a temporary event in the coastal zone shall be final and conclusive unless, on or before the 10th city hall working day following the decision of the Gty, an appeal in writing on forms provided by the Director of Community Development is filed with the City and or the Coastal Commission, as applicable, by the applicant. Section 17.76.110 Appeal - Temporary Events (A) Development authorized under this act shall be appealable to the Gty Council and or the Coastal Commission as applicable. (B) Any person or representative who appeared at a public hearing, or by other appropriate means prior to action on a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit for a temporary event, informed the Oty of his or her concerns about an application for such permit, or any person who. for good cause, was unable to do either of the foregoing objects to the action taken on such permit and wishes to appeal such action to the City Council and or Coastal Commission as applicable, is a qualified appellant and may appeal an action of the Gty Council in approving a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit for a temporary event to the Gty Council and or Coastal Commission as applicable. (C) There shall be no fee associated with an appeal to the Oty Council of an approved Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit for a temporary event in the coastal zone. (D) The appeal shall state the grounds on which the appeal is being made. The grounds for appeal must be based on any of the following: The provisions and or policies of this act, the Municipal Code, the Land Use Plan and or Local Coastal Program, or the Coastal Act. (E) The decision of the Gty Council on the appeal shall be supported by findings, and shall be set forth in full in a resolution. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant and appellant The action of the Gty Council shall be final and conclusive unless appealable to the California Coastal Commission. Section 17.76.120 Effective Date of Decision. Development pursuant to an approved Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit shall not commence until the permit becomes effective. Not withstanding any other provision of this act, the permit becomes effective only if all applicable appeal periods expire or if appealed, until all appeals, including those to the Coastal Commission, if any, have been exhausted. Section 17.76.130 Applications and case file a part of permanent record. (A) Applications filed pursuant to this act shall be numbered consecutively in the order of their filing and shall become a part of the permanent official records of the Gty Council, and there shall be attached thereto and permanently filed therewith copies of all case files, including. but not limited to: Final Reports, correspondences in all forms, exhibits, notices and actions with certificates or affidavits of compliance, posting. mailing or publications pertaining thereto. In addition, all electronic communications shall be saved, printed out and made a part of the permanent files of the case. (B) Adetailed summary prepared by the city clerk or deputy city clerk of all pertinent testimony offered at each public hearing held in connection with an application for a Coastal Development Permit for a temporary event filed pursuant to this act, and the names of persons testifying shall be recorded and made a part of the permanent files of the case. (C) A copy of all approved applications for a Park Use Permit issued pursuant to this act shall be sent to the Coastal Commission for determination of Coastal Development Permit requirements at least sixty (60) days in advance, until such time as the City has a certified Local Coastal Program that includes the provisions of this act. Section 17.76.140 Setting of hearing. All applications for a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit for a temporary event, shall be set by the clerk of the city council for a duly noticed public hearing when such hearing is to be held before the City Council and or the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission. The date of the hearing shall be not less than ten working days nor more than forty (40) calendar days from the time of filing of such verified application. Copies of all documentation. and information submitted for permit consideration shall be available for public review at a counter in city hall and the public library' during regular business hours at least three (3) city hall working days in advance of each public hearing and shall be made available in the packet at the hearing. Section 17.76.150 Investigations. The City Council shall cause to be made by its own members, or members of its staff, such investigation of facts bearing upon an application or appeal of a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit set for hearing, including, but not limited to: An analysis of previous temporary events conducted within the last two (2) years or two (2) events by the applicant, as will serve to provide all necessary information to assure action on each case consistent with the purposes of this act. Section 17.76.160 Violations. It shall be unlawful for any person, entity, corporation, or Local Government Agency to erect, construct, or begin commencement of a temporary event in the coastal zone whose application for a Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit is required pursuant to this act, or cause or permit the same to be done in violation of this act, or to .erect, construct, or begin commencement of a temporary event in the coastal zone without a valid Park Use Permit and or Coastal Development Permit. Any such person, entity. corporation, or Local Government Agency shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable as set forth in Section 17.76.170. Section 17.76.170 Violations - Penalties. (A) Every person, entity, corporation, or Local Government Agency who violates Section 17.76.160 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars (31,000.00) or by imprisonment in the Gty or County jail for a term not exceeding six (6) months or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each such person, entity, corporation, or Local Government Agency shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any such violation is committed, continued, or permitted by such person and shall be punishable accordingly. (B) The application of the above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions. Section 17.76.180 Fines deposited in Coastal Conservation Fund. All revenues received by the City from fines pursuant to this act shall be deposited into the Coastal Conservation Fund established by this act. Section. 17.76.190 Temporary event revenue deposited in Coastal Conservation Fund. All revenue received by the City from temporary events in the coa4tal zone, including, but not limited to: Park use feels, filming fees, exclusive use parking fees and other sources of revenue derived directly from said events shall be deposited directly into the Coastal Conservation Fund only. SECTION 4. Initiative Integrity. (A) This act shall be broadly construed and applied in order to fully promote its underlying purposes, and to be consistent with the United States Constitution. the Constitution of the State of California and the California Coastal Act. If any provision of this initiative conflicts directly or indirectly with any other provisions of law of the City of Hermosa Beach, or if any ordinance which is adopted concurrently with this ordinance which receives less votes and is in direct or indirect conflict with any provisions herein, it is the intent of the voters that those other provisions are repealed to the extent of the inconsistency and such inconsistencies shall be of no force and effect. (B) All ordinances, agreements, resolutions, and policies of the City of Hermosa Beach and the provisions and policies of the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Land Use Plan, Land Use Element of the General Plan, and the official zoning map which is in direct or indirect conflict with the intent and provisions herein are repealed to the extent of the inconsistency. (C) No provisions of this act or part thereof may be modified, amended, or repealed without a vote of the electorate, except as provided herein, and by the California Coastal Commission in order to comply with the minimum requirements of the California Coastal Act for consideration of a Local • Coastal Program proposed by the Gty of Hermosa • Beach. (D) If any provision of this act or part thereof, or section,aragraph, sentence, clause, word or - phrase of this act is, for any reason, held to be invalid, ineffective, unenforceable, or unconstitutional by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by the California Coastal Commission, or by reason of any preemptive State of California or Federal legislation, the 'remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, words or phrases hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect; it being expressly declared that this act and its provisions, and each section, paragraph, sentence, clause, word and phrase hereof, would have been prepared, proposed, adopted, approved and ratified irrespective of the fact that any one or more provisions, or sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, words or phrases be declared invalid, ineffective, unenforceable, or unconstitutional. (E) It is the will of the People of The City of Hermosa Beach that any legal challenges to the validity of any provision of this act be acted upon by the courts upon an expedited basis. SECTION 8. The Planning staff and Planning Commission is hereby authorized and directed to make any and all nonsubstantitive modifications consistent with the intent and provisions herein which are necessary to codify this act into existing City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Codes. Any other changes shall be limited to: Reformatting and revising chapter and section numbers and amending references to other Municipal Code sections to the extent of the inconsistency. The Planning staff and Planning Commission shall expedite compliance. SECTION 9. The City Council of The City of Hermosa Beach shall expedite approval of a Local Coastal Program which includes the provisions of this act without modification, and seek Coastal Commission approval and certification and take all further actions necessary to expedite implementation and enforcement of the provisions and intent of this act. SECTION 10. This initiative measure is to be adopted by the City Council of Hermosa Beach or be submitted to the voters at the next succeeding municipal election or at a special election as provided for by law. Page 6 of 6 SECTION 1.1. This act shall take effect the day after the election, or in the manner prescribed by law. SECTION 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law: REVISED .i/y/y i REFERENCE ITEM IMPACT(S) / ISSUES FISCAL IMPACT(S) SECTION 17.76.060 (9) No sales of any kinds Effects the following events that sell official event items on the sandy beach: 1. Pro Volleyball 2. Surf Festival 3. Film Festival 4. AAU Youth Volleyball 5. Millenium Celebration SECTION 17.76.060 (11) All parking lots in the City's Preferential Parking Program shall be protected from use by temporary events and shall not be used as off site mitigation lots for many events. The City uses lots such as Lot A for staging events . SECTION 17.76.060 (11) ..shall monitor each lot during events for which 1500 or more people are expected to attend on any day, in order to determine the impact of each event on these lots. Lots found to be occupied ninety percent (90%) or greater by 9:55 a.m. during an event... shall require an attendant with specific instructions to park beachgoers and visitors to public facilities only. This single item has several impacts with serious operational and fiscal consequences: 1. There 4 preferential parking lots in the coastal zone making monitoring them expensive. 2. Who would determine if lots were 90% occupied and how could monitors be "on call" with such short notice? 3. How would these monitors determine who is parking for an event versus for other public uses? Surely the public would "catch -on" to the restrictions and would soon be saying that they were just there to "go to the beach." 4. With monitors asking each vehicle why they were parking (and providing info on remote lots), traffic lanes would be "backed -up" at several areas in the City with resultant safety impacts. 1. Cost of monitoring 4 Lots estimated at $840 per day. 2. Cost of additional Police for traffic control estimated at $1,800 per day (3 Officers). 4 SUPPLEMENTAL a INFORMATION u March 4, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 9, 1999 PROPERTY TAX RETURN - AB304 (WILDMAN) Recommendation: That the City Council authorize a letter of support for AB304 (Wildman) and direct staff to track the bill as it moves through the legislative process. Background: This bill is designed to return the property tax taken by the state in the: early 1990's over 10 years. As you know, the state balanced its budget by transferring property taxes from cities and counties. This amounted to about $700,000 for us which, under this bill, would be returned at 10% a year. As you recall, several attempts to get the property taxes returned have failed for one reason or another. This bill will allow the cities and counties to be at the table when the "May Revise" is calculated and divided up among the various competing groups for state funding. Reslly submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 1 _,/9/9, March 4, 1999 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council March 9, 1999 VEHICLE REGISTRATION SURCHARGE - SB98 (ALARCON) Recommendation: That the City Council authorize a letter of support for SB98 (Alarcon) and direct staff to track the bill as it moves through the legislative process. Background: This bill will reauthorize the $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations with the South Coast Air Quality Management District. These funds have been used to fund the clean fuels program and other activities in order to help meet the federal clean air mandates. A fact sheet prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District is attached. Resp = fully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 1b FEB 25 '99 04:10PM SCAQMD SSC 909 396 3324 • Fact Sheet Senate Bill 98 (Alarcon), and Assembly Bill 38 (Washington) • P.3 In 1988 the State Legislature authorized the adoption of a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations within the South Coast Air Quality Management District to fund a clean fuels program to find and nurture new technologies to reduce air pollution. Since 1988, every dollar invested from this vehicle surcharge has been matched by another $4 invested by private industry, universities and other public agencies, effectively leveraging the program's $60 million investment to obtain $250 million in public/private matching funds to finance research and development projects valued at more than $310 million. The existence of this program has resulted in a vibrant public/private partnership engaged in developing new technologies to combat air pollution, with 87 of these programs currently underway.• This program has been instrumental in the development and deployment of low- and zero - emission technologies in critical transportation applications, including but not limited to: advanced electric cars; the world's first fuel cell buses; hybrid -electric delivery trucks; and locomotive engines running on liquefied natural gas. The local Southern California economy has benefited from tens of millions of dollars in public/private investments in clean fuel technologies since 1989. 40% of the emissions reductions needed in the South Coast District to meet federal clean air standards for ozone by 2010 rely on advanced technologies that do not exist today. A variety of products funded by this program have resulted in real emission reductions through the introduction of zero -emitting vehicles powered by fuel cells and clean fueled public transit buses. • The existing program has provided necessary research and development resources to technologies that might not have become commercially available without such investment. The successful commercialization of technologies essential to achieving acceptable air quality in the South Coast District is dependent•on the continuation of the advanced technology program. Senate,Bill 98, authored by Senator Richard Alarcon, and Assembly Bill 38, authored by Assembly Member Carl Washington, both introduced in the 1999 session of the California Legislature, would continue the clean fuels program until2004,•assuring that it will be an integral program to the regional•eforts to achieve the federal air quality health standard for ozone by 2010. 1 Scale : 1" = 20' One Parcel Area = 2,921 Sq. feet PARCEL MAP NO. 24968 IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH , COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOTS 23 AND 24, IN BLOCK 38, OF THE FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGES 59 AND 60 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES Subdivider's Statement: I hereby state that i am the subdivider of the lands included within the subdivision shown on this map within the distinctive border lines, and I consent to the preparation and filing of said map and subdivision. Larry Peha, (Subdivider) State of California ss. County of Los Angeles On this Zo71' day of uAu ,1999 ,before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Larry Peha , personally -known -to -me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted executed the instrument. MorrPA - aeesrnct, Notary Public , State of California County of Los Angeles, My Commission expires 3/a i/&ooa Record Owner: Beach Corporation Record Data: Record Data is from Tract No. 44031, M.B. 1070, pages 44and 45. EXP, 6-30-0> Easement Notes: EASEIMWT Easement of Warren Gillelen,for conduits and incidental purposes, per deed recorded in Book 1617, page 47 of Deeds, Records of Los Angeles County. Said easement is indeterminate in nature. T e es of MacPherson Oil Company, a California e •• - on, successor or assign- -, -: • , ners of the Leaseh• • - . - under an oil and gas lease recorded September 15 rument No. 89-1492729, Official Records of Los aunty, have been omi e • the provisions of (a)3C of the Subdivision Map Act. es of Larry Peha (Pehal ), Julie Peha, David Peha and Richard S. p c rights by a deed recorded Septe Official Records o of essor or assignee -- :ern • 8 • : • • e a rs of oil and mineral as Instrument No. 98-1690766, er the provisions es County, have been 36 (a) 3C of the Subdivision Map Act. .• 6th 2 /0' 2 o' (0 /0' • 5 77` ss'oy"jN STREET /90.00' II 0 7,7° 53°57" 0 140.00 4th STREET? 4eX034 ¢ 1 15 034-157 (4/S'�-//_27) MANHATTAN •• /ndicales the Boundary of dfie Zan) being subdvrded by,yis map. Sheet 1 of 1 Sheet riCEEVED MAR 0 2 1999 GUM. DEV. DEPT. Surveyor's Statement: This map was prepared by me or under my direction and was compiled from Record Data in conformance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances at the request of Larry Peha on October 15, 1998. I hereby state that this Parcel Map substantially conforms to the a proved or conditionally approved tentative map, if any. John H. Riahi , L.S. No. 5850 , Expires : 12-31-2000 City Engineer's Certificate: 1 hereby certify that 1 have examined this map and that it conforms substantially to the tentative map and all approved alterations thereof; that all provisions of subdivision ordinances of the City of Hermosa Beach applicable at the time of approval of the tentative map have been complied with; and that 1 am satisfied that this map is technically correct with respect to city records. HARRY W. STONE CITY ENGINEER Date : 3 - 2 - 99 By /`� �/�G�� DEPUTY R.C.E.-N0.1£37 65 Exp. : 6 30 -or Secretary of Planning Certificate: I hereby certify that the annexed map conforms substantially to the tentative map approved by the Planning Commission on the day of 199 . Date : By: Secretary of Planning of the City of Hermosa Beach City Clerk's Certificate: I hereby certify that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach by motion adopted at its session on the day of 199 , approved the annexed map. Date : By : City Clerk of the City Of Hermosa Beach City Treasurer's Certificate: I hereby certify that all special assessments levied under the jurisdiction of the City of Hermosa Beach to which the land included in the within subdivision or any part thereof is subject and which may be paid in full, have been paid in full. Date : By: Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach Condominium Notes: This subdivision is approved as a condominium project for two units, whereby the owners of the units of air space will hold an undivided interest in the common area which will, in turn, provide the necessary access and utility easement for the units. 5) 3$0 •oo 3-2-