Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/08/00. f00-6o.� 0 . City Council & Commission agendas and staff reports are available for your review on the City's web site located at www.hermosabch.org AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, August 8, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:10 p.m. Closed Session - Immediately following Regular Session MAYOR CITY CLERK J. R. Reviczky Elaine Doerfling MAYOR PRO TEM CITY TREASURER John Bowler John M. Workman COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER Kathy Dunbabin Stephen R. Burrell Sam Y. Edgerton CITY ATTORNEY Julie Oakes Michael Jenkins All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE OF APPRECIATION TO CAROL SWARTZ FOR SERVICE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION TO CHRIS KETZ FOR SERVICE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Although the City Council values your comments, the Brown Act generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Members of the public wishing to request the removal of an item from the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens also may speak: 1) during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar; 2) during Public Hearings; and, 3) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter from Charlotte Malone, Friends of the Library, requesting that the City 'Council consider reinstatement of the Library Subcommittee. RECOMMENDATION: Consider reinstatement of Library Subcommittee. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3, with public comment permitted at that time. Recommendation to approve minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held on July 25, 2000. (b) Recommendation to ratify check register and to approve cancellation of certain checks as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the June 2000 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report; and, 3). Investment report. (e) Recommendation to accept donations received by the City from the Hermosa Kiwanis Foundation for $500.00 to be used for Chevron Surf Camp instructors; from Entertainment Lighting Service for $10,000.00 to be used for community events; and, from South Bay Coalition for $1,000.00 to be used for summer youth activities at the Skate Track. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated July 31, 2000. (f) Recommendation to approve increasing the contract amount for Los Angeles Engineering Inc. by approximately $59,478 to cover anticipated change orders involving railing, waterline, expansion joints and lighting; approve increasing the contract amount for Concept Marine Associates Inc. by $21,000 to cover the added construction management fees for the extended duration needed to complete Phase H; and, authorize the transfer of $53,000 from CIP 00-630 Pier Renovation, Phase ll - General Fund to CIP 98-621 Phase H Pier Renovation, Phase II -General Fund in order the make the funds available. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 27, 2000. Recommendation to receive and file the Project No. CIP 98-621 Pier Renovation Phase II - Progress Report. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 27, 2000. (h) Recommendation to authorize the appropriation of $9,000 from the Equipment Replacement Fund for the repair of the tracked front -loader (caterpillar). Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated August 1, 2000. Recommendation to approve the Professional Services Agreement with John L. Hunter &Associates, Inc. to administer the City's Municipal Storm Water Program and implement NPDES permit requirements for an amount of $44,000; appropriate $4;000 from the Sewer Fund to increase the appropriated FY 2000-01 budget from $40,000 to $44,000 for this program; and, authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 20, 2000. (1) Recommendation to accept work by Inspection Engineering Construction (IEC) of Costa Mesa for Project Nos. CIP 96-153 and 96-156 - Traffic Signal Improvements at 14th Street and 13`h Street at Hermosa Avenue; authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion; and, authorize staff to release payment to IEC (10% retained for 35 days following filing of Notice of Completion). Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 26, 2000. (k) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding for the Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated August 3, 2000. (I) Recommendation to approve rate increase for City Prosecutor services from $6320 to $6560 per month and authorize City Manager to execute agreement. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated August 3, 2000: Recommendation to direct the City Clerk to appropriately amend the City's Conflict of Interest Code, ensuring it is accurate and up-to-date, and submit the amended Code to Council for final approval within 90 days, pursuant to State law. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated August 3, 2000. Recommendation to approve an amendment to the architectural services contract with Gillis and Associates in the amount of $5,300 for revisions to the City Hall .Renovation Prosect Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated August 3, 2000. (p) Recommendation to award construction contract for the terrazzo pavement and concrete curb repair on Pier Plaza east of the Pier head to Shaw & Sons Concrete Contractors in the amount of $19,771; authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the construction contract subject to approval by the City Attorney; and, authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary with the budget•of $1,977. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated August 1, 2000. Recommendation to award a three year audit contract (covering fiscal years 1999-00 through 2001-02, with an option to extend the agreement for two additional fiscal years), to the firm of Caporicci, Cropper &Larson, LLP (CC & L) in the amount of $61,580. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated August 2, 2000. Recommendation that City Council appropriate the balance of $6,801.23 remaining in the Millenium Fund to the DEC Special Event Account to be used for City- sponsored event(s). Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 3, 2000. CONSENT ORDINANCES NONE . ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION * ' Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4 TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING NONCONFORMING REMODEL SECTION 17.52. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated August 3, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Continue the public hearing on this item to City Council meeting of September 12, 2000 TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING LOT COVERAGE EXCEPTION SECTION 17.04. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated August 1, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive full reading of Ordinance. AMENDMENT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 2000-2001 PROGRAM REALLOCATING $25,000 FROM AMERICAN DISABILITY ACT COMPLIANCE PROJECT TO UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT ASSISTANCE FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 31, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Approve by minute order the reallocation and expenditure of $25,000 of the sixth year 2000-2001 Block Grant to the utility undergrounding project for assistance to low and moderate income households. MUNICIPAL MATTERS CONSIDERATION OF SIMILAR USE PROVISION FOR M-1 ZONED PROPERTY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 31, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council confirm that architect studio use is similar to other uses permitted in the M-1 Zone pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.28.020 of the Zoning Code.. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCENO. 964165, STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION CONTROL, TO PROVIDE STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FOR PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated. July 26, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and waive full reading of ordinance. AIRSPACE MONITORING. SYSTEM (ASMS) PROPOSAL - CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASING THE SYSTEM IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CITIES OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND REDONDO BEACH. Memorandum from City Manager. Stephen Burrell dated August 3, 2000. RECOMMENDATION; That the City Council authorize the purchase of the Airspace Monitoring System, so long as there is equal participation from Rancho Palos Verdes and Redondo Beach, in the amount of $31;667.00; that the City Council direct the City. Manager and City Attorney to coordinate the purchase of the ASMS with the other cities; and, that the City Council direct the City Manager to coordinate the site selection, installation and operation of the system, along with the other cities. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER RESPONSE TO CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY RESIDENTS REGARDING THE 441 OF JULY. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated August 3, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: Set a workshop meeting to hear concerns and review revisions to ordinances dealing with live bands, parties, etc.. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION APPLICATIONS. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated August 3, .2000. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council either schedule applicant interviews for a time certain (6:OOpm or earlier) prior to the September 12, 2000 meeting, with appointments to follow at the regular meeting, and extent the application filing periodin the interim, with a filing deadline of 6:OOpm, Wednesday, September 6, 2000, or schedule applicant interviews and appointments for an earlier date in August and extend the application filing period to a date certain, about one week before the scheduled meeting. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items; Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item, 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda, or, 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. NONE ANNOUNCEMENT IN OPEN SESSION OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED IN SESSION AS FOLLOWS: MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session meeting held on July 11, 2000. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. Existing Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Name of Case: City of Hermosa Beach v. Hermosa Beach Land and Water Company, et al. Case Number: YC036393 Initiation of Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(c) Number of Potential Cases: 1 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION ORAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT FRIENDS of the LIBRARY Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: REINSTATEMENT OF COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB -COMMITTEE Dear Steve: The Board of the Hermosa Beach Friends of the Library requests that council consider reinstatement of thelibrary sub -committee. This seems an appropriate time to evaluate the present service and to consider the future situation of the Hermosa Beach Library. The refurbishment has been completed to mixed reviews. Hours of operation have not been increased despite council's letters to Supvr. Knabe and the increased amount that Hermosa Beach tax payers donate for library services. We are now paying $422,000 per year for services which have not improved since 1995 when we were paying $314,818 per year. For these, and other reasons, the Friends of the Library feels that the situation should be studied and would appreciate reinstatement of a sub -committee comprised of two council members and past and present elected officers of the Hermosa Beach Friends of the Library to carry this out. Sincerely, Charlotte Malone Government Liaison HBFOL 550 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITYCOUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, July 25, 2000,. at the hour of 7:20 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Dick McCurdy ROLL CALL: Present: Bowler, Dunbabin, Edgerton, Oakes, Mayor Reviczky Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Reviczky welcomed the Loreto, Mexico students and chaperones who arrived today for a week's visit as partof the Hermosa Beach Sister City Association's student exchange program. He invited them forward for photographs and then presented each of them with City pins. Loreto Sister City Association President Dr. Primo Maraver presented Mayor Reviczky with a framed picture from Loreto for the City of Hermosa Beach. Hermosa Beach Sister City Association President Rudy Limas invited everyone to attend and participate at a Sister City fundraiser Thursday, July 27, at 6 P.M. at Dano's restaurant, noting that tickets were available at $20 each, with .all proceeds benefiting the student exchange program. Councilmember Bowler said the third and final beach concert in the 2000 series took place Sunday, July 23, featuring Richard Street, former lead singer of the Temptations, noting it was a wonderful eventthat was well attended. He said he would welcome the chance to expand the program if possible. He then noted that he and Councilmember Edgerton had gone to Washington tomeet with the FAA. Councilmember Edgerton commented on the trip to Washington, saying he did not think the FAA would do much to help the airport. situation. He said that opinion was buttressed by the meeting last night in Palos Verdes He said that the FAA had previously claimed that`` planes never flew over the beach cities, and now the FAA claims that the planes do fly over but it has always been that way.' He said the next step would be to take the matter to court. Councilmember Dunbabin asked who sponsored the beach concerts. Acting City Manager Mary Rooney said the beach concerts were primarily sponsored by Uncle Ben's Rice and Anheiser Busch.` Councilmember Dunbabin announced that Shakespeare in the Park would take place at 6 P.M. Sunday, August 13, at Valley Park, featuring "A Midsummer's Night Dream." Mayor Reviczky reported on last night's FAA meeting at Palos Verdes Peninsula High School, noting that he attended along with a number of Hermosa citizens. He said the only bright spot in the evening was news that the City of Los Angeles had City Council Minutes 07-25-00 Page 10306 hired a mediator who had success in San Francisco with a i . similar problem. CLOSED SESSION REPORT FOR MEETING reportable actions. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming OF JULY 11, " 2000 :. forward to address the Council at this time were: Victor de Gyarfas 833 15th Street, had concerns about consent calendar item 1(k)'; Mayor Reviczky said he would pull the item for discussion; Alan Kotter - 252 27th Court, commended the Police Department and thanked the City for having a great staff; commended Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld and Senior Building Inspector Charlie Swartz for their assistance with a recent problem; thanked Councilmember Edgerton and Mayor Reviczky for fighting the airport issue; Larry Peha 67 14th Street, said he had recently asked for a Code interpretation with respect to a project at 331-333 11th Street, noting an inconsistency by staff in past projects over decks and whether the five foot exception to site coverage applied; disagreed with the Planning, Commission's ruling, that a balcony covering a balcony was lot: coverage; requested that the Council consider the matter; and Stan and Lorraine 'Uranni owners of the property Mr. Peha referred to above, submitted informationpertaining to the matter. City Attorney Jenkins said the action referred to by Mr. Peha and the property owners took place at the Planning Commission meeting of June 20, and the action minutes of that meeting were presented to the Council at its. June 27 meeting. He said if the Council desired to consider the issue, it could be brought up at the end of tonight's agenda under "Other Matters. City. Council," at which time, staff could be directed to agendize the issue as a new item for Council consideration at the next meeting. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letters from Roger Creighton regarding concealed weapon. permits and badges. Supplemental memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 20,'2000. Action: To receive and file Motion Bowler, second Dunbabin. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 07-25-00 Page 10307 Letter from Joanne Edgerton, President of the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation, requesting City Council approval of a banner fundraising program. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Joanne Edgerton Hermosa Beach Education Foundation president, spoke to her letter, noting that all funds would go to the Education Foundation;. Steve Cannella 1216 llth,Place, board member of the Foundation, spoke of their fundraising efforts and urged approval of the request; Vicki Hanson - 1265 Bonnie Brae, also a board member, said all of the funds generated by the Education Foundation benefit the children; and Dr. Chris Jones Hermosa Valley School principal, spoke of his appreciation for the work of the Education Foundation, said they were building a music,;program; Acting. City Manager Rooney responded to Council questions. City Attorney Jenkins also responded to Council questions, advising the Council to establish fair criteria for the use of public property rather than limiting the use of banners to one group. Proposed Action: To approve the request of the Education Foundation for a banner fundraising program for a six- month trial period, with policies and restrictions on the advertising to be determined at a future meeting. Motion Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Bowler, Dunbabin. and Mayor Reviczky. Action: To direct staff to research the issue, including checking with other cities on their policies on long-term advertising on public property, and return with options for a banner program for non-profit organizations, Motion Mayor Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Letter from Alan Dettelbach concerning the Clark Field backstops, CIP 99-529. Supplemental memorandum from Community Resources. Director Mary Rooney dated July 19, 2000. Supplemental information from Community Resources Department dated July 24, 2000. Community Resources Director Rooney responded to Council -questions, noting it would be a four-week project. Coming forward'to address the Council on this item was: Alan Dettelbach - 124.0 Ninth Street, Hermosa -Beach Little League president, spoke to his letter; asked the Council to reconsider' its July 11 decision to reject the backstop bid, City Council Minutes 07-25-00 Page 10308 (Councilmember Edgerton left the dais and the room at 8:25 P.M.) Continuing to come forward to address the Council was: Clint Lau - 1239 17th Street, also with Little League, spoke ,in support of the request; said timing was important. City .Attorney Jenkins, responded to ,Council questions, saying the previous action could not be. reconsidered because State law prohibited, the revival of Public -Works bids that. had been rejected. Action: To approve the re -bidding schedule, as recommended by staff. Motion Bowler, second Dunbabin. The motion, carried, noting the absence of Edgerton CONSENT CALENDAR:, Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (n), with the exception of the following items, whichwere removed for discussion in -item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (g) Bowler, (k) Mayor Reviczky for Victor de Gyarfas, and (n) Mayor Reviczky. Motion Bowler, second Oakes. The motion carried, noting theabsence of Edgerton. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: 1) ' Minutes_ of the -Adjourned : Regular ---meeting held on July 11, 2000; and 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on July 11, 2000. (b) Action: To approve as 'presented the minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of July 11, 20.00 and the Regular Meeting of July 11, 2000. RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY CHECK REGISTER NO. 21857 THROUGH 22034, INCLUSIVE. Action:. To ratify the -check register as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE, AND FILE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA' ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. `(d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE. MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE JUNE 2000 FINANCIAL REPORTS. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki.Copeland dated July 20, 2000.. City. Council, Minutes 07-25-00 'Page 10309 Action: To receive June 2000 Financial (e) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CONTRACT FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT NURSE EDUCATOR WITH LYN RILEY IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000 FOR THE PURPOSES OF PROVIDING THE STATE MANDATED CONTINUING- EDUCATION TRAINING AND FOR ADMINISTERING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REQUIRED PARAMEDIC "QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM." Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley` dated July 10, 2000." Action: To approve Lyn Riley's contract in the amount of $15,000 for the purposes of providing the State -mandated continuing education training and for administering the Los Angeles County required paramedic "Quality Assurance Program" for fiscal year 2000-01 as recommended by staff (f) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF 19 SETS OF TURNOUTS, PROTECTIVE CLOTHING. FOR STRUCTURAL FIRE FIGHTING, FROM L. N. CURTIS & SONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,090.34. Memorandum from Fire Chief Russell Tingley dated, July 12, 2000. Action: To authorize the purchase of 19 sets of Turnouts, Protective Clothing for Structural Fire Fighting from L.N. Curtis & Sons, in the amount of $18,090.34, as recommended by staff. (g) RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT DONATION RECEIVED BY THE CITY FROM S & N CORPORATION, DBA HERMOSA SALOON, FOR $100.00 TO --;BE USED FOR FIRE -TRAINING EQUIPMENT. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland, dated July 17, 2000. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember'Bowler for separate discussion later in the meeting in order to publicly acknowledge and thank the donor. Action: To accept the $100 donation received by the City from S & N Corporation, dba Hermosa Saloon, to be used for Fire training equipment. Motion Bowler,; second. Dunbabin. The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 6, 2000. Action: To receive and file the action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission, meeting of July 6, 2000. (i) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ACTION MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 2000. City Council Minutes 07-25-00 Page 10310 Action:. To receive and file: the action minutes Planning Commission meeting of July 18,'2000. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATES, ORDER OF WORK AND CALL FOR BIDS ON THE GOLDEN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS; INSTRUCT THE CITY CLERK TO POST A NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS FOR SAID PROJECT; AND, APPROVE THE RE -APPROPRIATION OF $61,218.00 FROM FY 1999- 00 BUDGET" TO THE FY 2000-01 BUDGET. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 18, 2000. Action':_ To.approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Approve: the plans, specifications, estimates, order of work. and call for bids on the Golden Avenue Street Improvements; 2)' Instruct the City. Clerk to post a Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for said 'project; and 3); Approve the re=appropriation of $61,218 from FY 1999-00 budget to the FY 2000-01 budget. (k) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT FINAL-- RESOLUTION APPROVING 71 ROOM HOTEL AT 1530 PACIFIC .COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld dated July 19,:2000. This item was removed from the consent:calendar by. Mayor Reviczky, at .the; request of Victor.- de Gyarfas, for separate discussion later in the meeting., Coming forward to address the;Council-on this issue was: Victor de Gyarfas 833 15th Street, noted an error in the resolution on page 7, item 18, said Government Code Section 65907 had been repealed and the correct section is 65009; said the developer stated at the last meeting that the vents for the laundry room could be relocated on thewest side or front of the building (page 5, item 1.b) and requested that be done. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 00-6088, entitled "A RESOLUTION' OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE "CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 71 -ROOM HOTEL ON. APPEAL, AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE' DECLARATION AT 1530 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, AND. LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHERLY 67.5 FEET OF LOTS 1 AND 2, AND LOT 3, HEFFNER, FIORINI, ALLEN TRACT; AND THE WESTERLY 145.67 FEET OF A PORTION OF LOT 5, BLOCK 84, 2ND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH," which, reflects the action of the City Council at its July 11, 2000 meeting, amended this evening as follows: page 7, item 18, corrected to read "...Government Code Section 65009."_; and page 5, item 1.1D), changed to read "The vent for the laundry room shall be relocated as far west as possible." Motion Mayor Reviczky, second Bowler. 'The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. (1) RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO STEVENS-GARLAND ASSOCIATES,INC. FOR PROVIDING CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR A FEE OF $10,000; AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE AGREEMENT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND, AUTHORIZE STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH STEVENS-GARLAND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR SERVICES IN THE FY 2001-02. Memorandum from Public Works Director Harold Williams dated July 20, 2000 Action: To approve the staff recommendation to 1) Award a Professional Services Agreement to Stevens - Garland Associates, Inc. for providing City Traffic -Engineering Services for a fee of $10,000;. 2) Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the attached Professional Services Agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney and Authorize the staff to negotiate an agreement with Stevens -Garland Associates, Inc. for services in fiscal year 2001-02: RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CLASS SPECIFICATION FOR BUILDING INSPECTOR. Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Michael Earl dated July 20, 2000. Action": To approve the class specification for Building, Inspector, as recommended by staff and approved by the Civil Service Board. (n) RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE.THE PURCHASE OF.ONE (1) NEW DODGE DURANGO 4 WHEEL DRIVE BEACH PATROL VEHICLE FROM GLEN E. THOMAS DODGE OF LONG BEACH IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,313.71 (INCLUDES TAX). Memorandum from Police Chief Val Straser dated July 20, 2000. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action:" To reject the bid and direct staff to re -bid the project and bring the item back in September. Motion Mayor Reviczky, second. Oakes.: The motion carried, noting the absence of Edgerton. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items (g), (k), and (n) were heard at this time but are shown in order for.clarity. City Council Minutes 07-25-00 Page 10312 Public comments on items Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None At 8.:50 P.M., the meeting recessed. At 9:10 P.M., the meeting reconvened,with all Councilmembers present. removed from the Consent MUNICIPAL MATTERS 4. PRESENTATION BY RCN. TELECOM SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. REGARDING THEIR APPLICATION FOR A TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINE AGREEMENT AND CABLE TELEVISIONS FRANCHISE IN HERMOSA BEACH. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 17.2000 Community Resources Director Rooney ':'presented the staff reportand responded to Council questions, noting the company would be subject to the City's 5 -percent franchise fee. Coming forward to address the Council on this issue were: David Hankin Vice President, of Regulatory and Government Affairs for. RCN Telecom Services of California, Inc'., gave. a presentation and responded to Council questions; Bob Duchen Vice President of RCN Telecom Services, was present to answer Council questions, and Sieg Weber - construction director for RCN Telecom Services, responded to Council questions; said RCN would pay all costs associated with the undergrounding of theirservice lines and would. coordinate with the City concerning street paving projects. Action: To receive arid file recommended by staff. Motion Bowler, second Dunbabin. unanimous vote. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - the staff report, as The motion carried by a CITY MANAGER - None . MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - a. CITY COUNCIL DESIGNATE A VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE. 'Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated July 20, 2000._ Action : To designate Mayors Reviczky as delegate and Mayor Pro Tempore Bowler as alternate for the League of California Cities annual -conference on September 9, 2000. Motion Edgerton, second_ Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes 07-25-00 Page 10313 OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL a.` Request from Mayor Reviczky to consider support for Senate Bill 1546, which appropriates the State's share of costs for the construction of the Southern California Veterans Home in Los Angeles County. Mayor Reviczky spoke to. his request. Action To approve the support for Senate; Bill 1546, requested. Motion Mayor Reviczky, second Edgerton. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Request for Code Interpretation with respect to site.. coverage for a project at 331-333 llth Street. Action: To direct staff to agendize this item for Council consideration at its August 8, 2000 meeting. Motion Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote Mayor Reviczky, with the consensus of the Council, directed staff to provide an update on the Pier project at the next meeting, with monthlywritten reports thereafter. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Tuesday, July 25, 2000, at the hour of 10:55 P.M. to the Adjourned Regular Meeting of Tuesday; August 1, 2000, at the hour of 7:10 P.M., for purposes of conducting a joint meeting with the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory, Commission. VOUCHRE2 07/20/00 07:36 CITY. OF HERMOSA BEACH. VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE' NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 22035 07/20/00 000243 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL A PAYROLL/771 TO 7-15-00 001-1103. PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 105-1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 109-1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00. 110-1103- PAYROLL/771 10-1103PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 115-1103' PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 117-1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 121-.1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 125-1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 126-1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7'15-00 145-1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 146-1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-1500 150-1103 _ PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 152-1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 160-1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7-15-00 705-1103 PAYROLL/7-1 TO 7=15-00 715-1103 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NUMBER -22036 '07/20/00 000026 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMEN RETIREMENT/7-1 TO.7-15-00 001-2033. RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 105-2033', RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 109-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 110-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 115-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 117-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 121-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO.7-15-00 125-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 126-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 146-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 150-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 160-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15.00 705-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 715-2033 RETIREMENT/7-1 TO 7-15-00 001-3935 ITEM AMOUNT 266,481.35 7,085.13 795.56 30,029.90 302.96 586.52 504.93 193.44 193.44 1,093.24 967.19 685.83 82.16 7,415.22 2,364.20 4,414.18 CHECK AMOUNT 40,879.93 611.48 68.21 3,001.48 27.60 50.13 46.01 16.69 16.69 83.47 62.30 663.17 195.15 393.32 11,062.12- 323,195.25 VOUCHRE2 07/20/00 07:36 FUND TITLE P CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER'.. FOR ALL PERIODS AMOUNT PAGE 001 GENERAL FUND296,299.16.. � 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 7,696.61 696. 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 03. 77 110 PARKING FUND 33,031.388 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 330.56 117 AB939 FUND 550.946 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 0.4 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 0.13 " 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 211 1,093.24 1,09 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 050. .264 6 88.13 150 GRANTS FUND 152 AIR.QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 8,078.3981 6 160 SEWER FUND78.39 705 INSURANCE FUND 8,2,0557.35 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 358,248.76 VOUCHRE2 07/20/00 15:52 CITY OF HERMOSA'BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER . FOR ALL PERIODS ---> VOID CHECKS CHECK NUMBERS COMMENTS 022040 ' VOID 022060 VOID' VOUCHRE2 07/20/00 15:52 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 22037 07/20/00 008955 AAE INC. 22038 07/20/00 006827. ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 22039 07/20/00 005179 AT&T 22041 07/20/00 009085 BLACKMORE MASTER DISTRI 22042 07/20/00 010353 ARTHUR BOURGEOIS 22043 07/20/00 005595 CALIFORNIA CHARTER 22044 07/20/00 005935 CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT 22045 07/20/00 010350 CFCA MISSION 2000 22046 07/20/00 000267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 2 ITEM DESCRIPTION ENGINEERING/BIKE LANE SCHOOL CRSSG GD SERV/6/18-30 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000` LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 LONG DISTANCE CHRG'S/MAY 2000 CHRG'S/MAY 2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000. CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000 CHRG'S/6/2000. CHRG'S/6/2000 LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG• LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG LONG DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE DISTANCE PRISONER MEALS/JULY 2000 REFUND CASH PAYMENT SUMMER EXCURSION/7/5/2000 -_ PROMENADE CLEANING/5/8-22/2000 STRAND CLEANING/5/27-29/00 REGISTRATION/TINGLEY HWY MAINT/MAY 2000 ACCOUNT NUMBER 121-8144-4201 001-2102-4201 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 . 001.1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 715-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 - 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-1121-4304 '001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-114174304 001-1202-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 715-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304, 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 110-1204-4304 -110-3302-4304 001-2101-4306 307-3940, 145-3409-4201 109-3301-4201. 109-3301-4201 001-2201-4317 105-2601-4251 ITEM AMOUNT 2,084.10 922.88 .90 .22 .45 3.60 3.83 8.78 5.63 5.85 .45 67.99 28.82 4.05 6.53 45.47 25.89 4.50 12.16 .14 .03 .07 .54 .58 1.33 .85 .88 .07 10.26 4.35 .61 .99 6.86 3.91 .68 1.83 77.64 8,600.56 814.15 3,000.00 600.00 150.00 1,677.68 CHECK AMOUNT 2,084.10 922.88 259.10 77.64 8,600.56 814.15 3,600.00 150.00 1,677.68 VOUCHRE2 07/20/00 15:52 • VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 22047 07/20/00 22048 07/20/00 22049 07/20700 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL 009844 KATHY DUNBABIN , 1010352 JULIE EAKINS 22050 07/20/00 .000165 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO P 22051 07/20/00 005626 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. 22053 07/20/00 007853 EMPIRE PIPE .CLEANING & 22054 07/20/00 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP, 22055 07/20/00 008175 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES 22056 07/20/00 008931 22057 07/20/00 010351 FRED•PRYOR SEMINARS 22058 07/20/00 .006976 GRAPHIC ART PRODUCTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION FILM & DEVELOPMENT/JUNE 2000 'PER DIEM/7/26-29/2000 REFUND ASSESSMENT PAYMENT AUTO AUTO AUTO AUTO AUTO AUTO AUTO PART PART PART PART PART PART PART PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 PURCHASE/JUNE 2000, PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 PURCHASE/JUNE 2000.: PURCHASE/JUNE 2000' PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 AUTO PART PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 AUTO PART PURCHASE/JUNE-2000 AUTO PART PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT/00/01 SOFTWARE PURCHASE DIGITAL CAMERA/3 YR WARRANTY SEWER MAINT/5/22-6/01/00 EXPRESS MAIL 'EXPRESS.MAIL EXPRESS MAIL .EXPRESS MAIL 'EXPRESS MAIL EXPRESS MAIL, ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4201 001-1101-4317 617-2252 715-3104-4311 715-2601-4311 715-3102-4311 715-4206-4309 160-3102-4309 715-4202-4311 715-3102-4311 715-2101-4311 715-2201-4311 715-3302-4311 001-2021 001-2022 715-1206-4201 001-1121-4201 .715-1206-5401 LIABILITY TRUST ACCOUNT FLEMING & ASSOCIATES,TR WORKER COMP CLAIMS/6/16-6/30, 22059 07/20/00 REGISTRATION/E. KELLEY PARKING TICKETS TICKET ENVELOPES 000015 GTE. CALIFORNIA, INCORPO PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2000 PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2000 PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2000 PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2000 PHONE'BILLING/JUNE 2000 PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2000 PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2000 PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2000 PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2000 ITEM AMOUNT 86.06 200.00 819.00 28.75 42.21 179.18 24.93 56.25 110.20 119.20 543.98 120.78 152.89 28.14 28.14 1,005:17 521.13 160-3102-4201'', 10,164.37 001-2101-4305 001-1203.4201 001-2101-4305 001-1203-4201 001-1203-4201 001-1203-4201 705-1209-4324. 705-1217-4324 110-3302-4317 21.28 16.13 10.47 30.55 18.19 16.26 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT .86.06 200.00 819.00 1,378.37 4,519.32 10,848.06 179.00 110-3302-4305 110-3302-4305 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304: 001-1141-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1203-4304 715-1206-4304 001-1208-4304 • 9.42 2.35 4.71 37.67 91.82 40.02 58.86 61.21 4.71 VOUCHRE2 07/20/00. 15:52 VOUCHER/. CHECK CHECK - NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 22061 07/20/00 009657 .INFOLINK 22062 07/20/00 009949 IRISH CONSTRUCTION 22063 07/20/00 007880 JAMESTOWN PRESS 22064 07/20/00 007937 .ELRICK KELLEY 22065 07/20/00 009737 LESLIE SOLYMOSI CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER• FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PHONE BILLING/JUNE PHONE BILLING/JUNE PHONE BILLING/JUNE PHONE BILLING/JUNE PHONE BILLING/JUNE PHONE BILLING/JUNE PHONE BILLING/JUNE PHONE BILLING/JUNE PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY PHONE BILLING/MAY 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 BACKGROUND CHECKS/6/2000 MYRTLE UNDERGROUNDING/3/2000 BUSINESS CARD PURCHASE PER DIEM/SUPERVISOR CLASS BEE REMOVAL/19TH STREET 22066 07/20/00 008445 LITTLE CO OF. MARY HOSPI EMPLOYEE MEDICAL EXAMS _. 22067 07/20/00 008836 LONG BEACH AQUARIUM OF SUMMER EXCURSION/JULY 5;2000 22068 07/20/00 008231 LONG BEACH AUTO/RADIO AUTO ALARM REMOTES 22069 07/20/00 000605 MANHATTAN FORD AUTO PART PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 22070 07/20/00 008457 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM COPIER USAGE/JUNE 2000 COPIER USAGE/JUNE 2000 COPIER USAGE/JUNE 2000 COPIER USAGE/JUNE 2000 COPIER USAGE/JUNE 2000 22071 07/20/00 008975 MOBIL FLEET GAS CARD PURCHASES/JUNE 2000 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-4101=4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-1121-4304 001-1131-4304 001-1132-4304 001-1141-4304 001-1201-4304 001-1202-4304 001-1203-4304 715-1206.4304 001-1208-4304• 001-2101-4304 001-2201-4304 001-4101-4304 001-4201-4304 001-4202-4304 001-4601-4304 110-1204-4304 110-3302-4304 001-1203-4201 307-8182-4201 001.-1208-4305 110-3302-4317 110-3302-4201 001-1203-4320 001-4601-4308 715-2101-4311 715-2101-4311 001-1208-4201 001-4601-4201 ' 001-1208-4201 00172201-4201 110-3302-4201 ITEM AMOUNT 711.00 301.35 42.38 68.27 475.57 270.75 47.09 127.13 8.89 2.22 4.45 35.58 37.80 86.72 55.59 57.82 4.45 671.55 284.63 40.02 64.49 449.18 255.72 44.47 120.08 247.20 77,965.02 81.19 50.00 85.00 1,415.00 293.25 81.19 10.18 130.90 44.61. 68.43 44.63 8.93 CHECK AMOUNT 715-2101-4310. 2,330.66 • • 4,577.97 247.20 77,965.02 81.19 50.00 85.00 1,415.00 293.25 81.19 10.18 297.50 VOUCHRE2 07/20/00 15:52 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 22072 07/20/00 009854 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS. 22073 07/20/00 008768 "QUADRANT -SYSTEMS 22074 07/20/00 .009356 QUALITY SILKSCREEN" 22075 07/20/00 009852 QUANTUM CONSULTING -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK. REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION GAS CARD GAS CARD GAS CARD GAS CARD GAS CARD GAS CARD GAS CARD GAS CARD. GAS CARD GAS CARD GAS CARD PURCHASES/JUNE PURCHASES/JUNE PURCHASES/JUNE PURCHASES/JUNE PURCHASES/JUNE PURCHASES/JUNE PURCHASES/JUNE PURCHASES/JUNE PURCHASES/JUNE PURCHASES/JUNE PURCHASES/JUNE 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000. .2000 2000 2000. 2000 2000 CELL PHONE BILLING/JULY 2000 CELL PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2000 ANNUAL SOFTWARESUPPORT/00-01 HOCKEY LEAGUE SHIRTS/SUMMER 00 'CONSTRUCT/INSPECTION/2/1-29 CONSTRUCTION/INSPECT/2/1-29 CONSTRUCTION'INSPECT/2/1-29 CONSTRUCTION INSPECT/3/1-31 CONSTRUCTION INSPECT/3/1-31 CONSTRUCTION INSPECT/4/1-30 CONSTRUCTION INSPECT/4/1-30 PROJECT MANAGER/4/1-30/2000 PROJECT MANAGER/4/1-30/2000 PROJECT MANAGER/4/1-30/2000 PROJECT MANAGER/4/1-30/2000 PROJECT MANAGER/4/1-30/2000 PROJECT MANAGER/4/1-30/2000 PROJECT. MANAGER/4/1-30/2000 PROJECT MANAGER/4/1-30/2000 .PROJECT MANAGER/4/1-30/2000 ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-31/00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-31/00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-31/00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-31/00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-31/00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-31/00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-31/00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-31/00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-31/00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-31/00. ENGINEERING SERVICES/5/1-3.1/00 CONSTRUCTION INSPECT/5/1-31 ACCOUNT, NUMBER 715-2201-4310 715-4201-4310 715-4202-4310 715-3302-4310 715-3104-4310 715-4601-4310.- 715-2601-4310 715-3102-4310 715-4206-4310 001-1250 715-1236 001-2101-4304. 001-2101-4304 715-1206-4201 -001-4601-4308 °22076 07/20/00 009611 SEASIDE LAGOON 22077 07/20/00 010347 STANDARD REGISTER DAY CAMP EXCURSION/7/12/00 ENCODER PURCHASE/5/2000 307-8182-4201 308-8183-4201 308-8183-4201 307-8182-4201 308-8183-4201 307-8182-4201 308-8183-4201 121-8144-4201. 115-8144-4201 146-8150-4201 126-8507-4201 126-8529-4201 125-8530-4201 105-8621-4201 121-8621-4201 125-8627-4201. 121.8144-4201 115-8144-4201 146-8150-4201 126-8507-4201 126-8529-4201 125-8530-4201` 105-8621-4201 121-8621-4201 125-8627-4201 001-4202-4201_ 160-3102-4201 307-8182-4201 001-4601-4201 001-1202-5402 ITEM AMOUNT 201.19 85.27 254.09 299.59 203.70 17.47 245.57 101.26 36.26 64.10 136.03 419.49 597.96 600.00 787.19 6,825.00 5.00 2,595.00 10,840.00 3,120.00 10,383.00 3,055.00 4,050.00 2,964.00 2,297.00 1,046.00 1,399.00 1,222.00 964.00 80.1.00 557.00 1,414.00 1,291.00 1,997.00 2,417.00 2,390.00 1,861.00 1,060.00 612.00 680.00 5,785.00 4,290.00 8,130.00 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 3,975.19 5,729.17. 5,729.17 VOUCHRE2 07/20/00 15:52 VOUCHER/. CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS" ITEM DESCRIPTION 22078 07/20/00 005995 STARGAZER PRODUCTIONS SUMMER SENIOR EXCURSION/2000 22079 07/20/00 009198 STONEBRIDGE PRODUCTIONS SUNSET CONCERT/JULY 2000 22080 07/20/00 009153 TOSCO FLEET SERVICES GAS CARD CHARGESJUNE 2000 GAS CARD CHARGES JUNE 2000 GAS CARD CHARGES JUNE 2000 GAS CARD CHARGES"JUNE 2POO GAS CARD CHARGES JUNE 2000 22081 07/20/00 000123. TRIANGLE HARDWARE HARDWARE PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 HARDWARE PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 HARDWARE PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 HARDWARE PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN 22082 07/20/00 008207 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT/6/00 22083 07/20/00..003209 VERIZON WIRELESS. CELLPHONE PURCHASE/WOLCOTT CELL PHONE BILLING/JUNE 2000 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SUMMER 2000 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4601-4201: 001-4601-4201 715-2201-4310 715-3104-4310 715-2601-4310 715-3102-4310 715-1236 160-3102-4309 001-4204-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4202-4309. 001-2021 001-2022 160-3102-4201 170-2103-5401 001-2101-4304 001-4601-4221 ITEM AMOUNT 452.60 7,500:00 380.37 17.66 80.90 76.26 32.27 233.63 234.10 159.04 110.35 81.90 81.90- 81.25 61.66 438.19 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 452.60 7,500.00 81.25 499.85 61.25 61.25 248,407.75 VOUCHRE2 07/20/00 15:52 CITY OF'HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS: FUND TITLE AMOUNT-- 001 GENERAL FUND 31,662.65 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 3,701.68 109 .DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 3,600.00 110 PARKING FUND 3,199.32 115, STATE GAS TAX FUND 4,255.00 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 8,961.10 125 ,PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND 4,320.00 126 .4/ UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 7,252.00 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 814.,15 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 4,294.00. 160 SEWER FUND. 14,825.50 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 61.66 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND 122,743.58 308 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND. 8,775.00 617 MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND 819.00 705 INSURANCE FUND 15,367.38 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUNEL 13,755.73 -TOTAL 248,407.75. PAGE < 7 VOUCHRE2 07/27/00 18:00 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 22085 07/27/00 000935 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 22086 07/27/00 008869 HEATHER H. ALLEY 22087 07/27/00 007121, ANDERSON SUPPLY 22088 07/27/00 010369, LOIS ANDERSON 22089 07/27/00 004447 JOHN D.'ANDREN 22090 07/27/00 000152 ' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/JULY 00 INSTRUCTORS FEE/SURF CAMP 00 TRANSFORMER CLASS REFUND' REFUND 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE SHOP SHOP SHOP MATS SHOP MATS MATS MATS SHOP MATS MATS MATS SHOP MATS MATS MATS SHOP 22091 07/27/00 009836 MARGUERITE L. BAIERSKI 22092 .07/27/00 000252 BEACH TRAVEL 22093 07/27/00 004277 OLIN BELL 22094 07/27/00 007109 ADAM BURT 22095 07/27/00 009662 C.A.P.E. ACCOUNTING DEP 22096 07/27/00 007368 TOWELS/MAY 2000 TOWELS/MAY 2000 TOWELS/MAY 2000 CLEANED/MAY 2000 TOWELS/MAY 2000 CLEANED/MAY 2000 CLEANED/MAY 2000 CLEANED/MAY 2000 TOWELS/JUNE 2000 CLEANED/JUNE 2000 CLEANED/JUNE 2000 CLEANED/JUNE 2000 TOWELS/JUNE 2000 CLEANED/JUNE, 2000 CLEANED/JUNE 2000 CLEANED/MAY 2000 TOWELS/MAY 2000 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/JUNE 2000 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SUMMER 00 AIRFARE/HAHN INSTRUCTOR/BASKETBALL CAMP INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/7/2000 MEMBERSHIP DUES/TEREAJOHNSON CAMUNICIPAL BUSINESS T MEMBERSHIP DUES/M. HALL 22097 07/27/00 008436 EDGAR CALDERON 22098 07/27/00 005595 CALIFORNIA CHARTER 22099 07/27/00 005935 AUDIO OPERATION/7/15/00 TRANSPORTATION/SUMMER BLAST CALIFORNIA STREET MAINT DOWNTOWN LOT C & B/JUNE 2000 STREET SWEEPING/JUNE 2000 PROMENADE STEAM CLEANING/6/00 PORTER SERVICES/JUNE 2000 "22100 07/27/00 ' 000016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVIC WATER BILLING/JULY 2000 ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2201-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4204-4309 001-2111 105-3105 001-2201-4309 :715-4206-4309 001-3104-4309 001-4204-4309 001-3104-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 715-4206-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4204-4309 715-4206-4309 001-2101-4309 001-4204-4309 001-4202-4309 715-4206-4309 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-2201-4317 001-4601-4221 001-46014221 001-2101-4317 110-1204-4315 001-4601-4201 145-3409-4201 109-3301-4201 109-3301-4201 109-3301-4201 109-3301-4201 105-2601-4303 ITEM AMOUNT 250.25 1,079.23 75.42 30.00 24.61 13.25 28.30 12.30 41.18 13.05 51.46 41.18 60.22 28.30 51.46 41.18 60.22 49.55 52.46 42.18 60.22 29.80 297.54 465.46 99.50 385.00 560.00 35.00 50.00 50.00 782.29 6,250.00 12,200.00 4,000.00' 1,200.00 5,108.99 CHECK AMOUNT 250.25 1,079.23 75.42 30.00 24.61. 676.31 763.00 99.50 385.00 560.00 35.00 50.00 50.00. 782.29 23,650.00 VOUCHRE2 07/27/00 18:00 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 22101 07/27/00 007022 ROBERT CARSON 22102- 07/27/00 000153 CINTAS'CORPORATION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER. FOR ALL PERIODS .` ITEM DESCRIPTION WATER BILLING/JULY-2000 WATER BILLING/JULY 2000 WATER BILLING/JULY 2000 REFUND 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE •UNIFORM RENTAL/JUNE 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/JUNE-2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/JUNE. 2000 UNIFORM RENTAL/JUNE 2000 22103 07/27/00 008811 DIANE. CLEARY 22104 07/27/00 009110 CONCEPT MARINE JUNE TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE PHASE 2 CONST.MANAGEMENT. 22105 07/27/00 009614 'CONTINENTAL MAPPING SER 300' NOTICING/JULY 2000 22106 07/27/00 007809 CORPORATE EXPRESS RETURNED MERCHANDISE/JUNE 2000 TYPEWRITER PURCHASE/7/2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JULY 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JULY 2000. OFFICE SUPPLIES/JUNE 2000' OFFICE SUPPLIES/JULY 2000 LAMINATOR PURCHASE/JULY 2000 OFFICE.SUPPLIES/JUNE 2000 ,OFFICE,SUPPLIES/JUNE 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JULY 2000 RETURNED OFFICE SUPPLIES/6/00 RETURNED MERCHANDISE/JUNE 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JUNE 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JUNE 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JUNE-2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JULY 2000 RETURNED MERCHANDISE OFFICE SUPPLIES/JUNE. 2000 OFFICE SUPPLIES/JUNE. 2000 22107 07/27/00 010364 COUNTY OF ORANGE 07/27/00 007700 " CPRS 22109 07/27/00 004689 DATA TICKET, INC. 22110 07/27/00 010356 SWARNA DEALWIS 22111 07/27/00 000147 THE DEVELOPMENT 22112 07/27/00 002855 DICTAPHONE,' INC. 22113 07/27/00 004394 DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPL. JRAINING/GAGLIA/JUNE 2000 MEMBERSHIP• DUES/LISA LYNN ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-4202-4303 001-420474303 109-3304-4303 105-3105 00174202-4187 001-4202-4187 001-4202-4187 001-4202-4187 001-4101-4201 121-8621-4201 001-4101-4201 001-1208-4305 001-4601-4315 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305' 001-4601-4305 001-1208=4305` 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001.1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208-4305 001-1208.4305 001-2101-4317 001-4601-4315 DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/JUNE 2000 110.1204-4201 DMV RECORD RETRIEVAL/JULY 2000 .110-1204-4201 RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND-' FILM PROCESSING/JUNE 2000. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/2000/2001 FILM PURCHASE/JULY '2000 001-2111 001-3104-4309.'' 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4305 ITEM AMOUNT 1,295.28 760.29 5.45 24.61 87.05 5.12 186.49 89.94 220.00 12,000.00 2,450.00 57.13- 194.84 224.55 2.09 205.58 3.52 165.58 137.82 69.26 15.66 20.09- 10.92- 246.77 0.0910.92246.77 15.66 20.09 337.45 59.58- 267.30 57.13 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 7,170.01 24.61 368.60, 220.00 12,000.00 2,450.00 38.57 500.00 32.06 1,265.75 139.05 161.07. 500.00 32.06 1,265.75 139.05 VOUCHRE2 07/27/00 18:00 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 22114 07/27/00 009112 DMR TEAM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION RESURFACING/HERMOSA 22115..07/27/00 010287 DOTY BROS. EQUIPMENT CO NEW SCE SERVICE AUBREY CT 22116 07/27/00 010055 THOMAS & ANNE ELLIOTT LEVY OVERPAYMENT MYRTLE 99/00 ACCOUNT NUMBER 146-8150-4201 105-2601-4201 617=2252 ' 22117 07/27/00 001294 EXECUTIVE -SUITE SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 2000 001-4204-4201 JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 2000 001-4204-4201 JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 2000 001-4204-4201 JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 2000 001-4204-4201 'JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 2000 001-4204-4201 JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 2000 001-4204-4201 JANITORIAL SERVICES/JUNE 2000 001-4204-4201 22118 07/27/00 001962 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. EXPRESS MAIL/JUNE 2000 22119 07/27/00 008773 ANTHONY FERRANTE 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE 22120 '07/27/00- 008422 .FIRE INFORMATION:SUPPOR 1 QRT FIRE MARSHAL REPORT' 22121 07/27/00 010372 JANICE GARCIA 22122 07/27/00 006797 DAWN GNADT 22123 07/27/00 008071 GORDON H..CHONG & ASSOC CONSTRUCTION ADMIN/4/2000 22124 07/27/00 010359 RICHARDGRAY 22125 07/27/00 009807 JEANETTE GROLLMAN 22126 07/27/00 009056 GTE INTERNETWORKING 22127 07/27/00 010368 MARSHALL HATTORI 22128 07/27/00 007547 HDL, COREN AND CONE 22129 07/27/00 010374 DAYNA HEBERT. 22130 07/27/00 010373 KIMBALL HERROD 001-4601-4308_ 105-3105 001-2201-4201 REFUND FORFEIT FEE SPRING -2000: 001-2111 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/JULY 2000 CITATION REFUND/ADMIN HEARING CLASS REFUND 001-4601-4221 121-8624-4201. 110-3302 001-2111 E-MAIL/WEB PAGE STORAGE/JULY; 715-1206-4201 RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND CAFR STATISTICAL SECTION PACK CLASS REFUND/SUMMER 2000... REFUND FORFEIT FEE SPRING' 2000 22131 07/27/00 010355 THE HOSPICE FOUNDATION REFUND OF BANNER PERMIT FEE 22132 07/27/00 010309 IACP CONFERENCE REGISTR REGISTRATION/STRASER 22133 07/27/00 001484 INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK' PROPERTY. INSURANCE/FY 00/01 EARTHQUAKE INS/PK STRUCTURE EMPLOYEE BACKGROUND CHECK/6/00 22134 07/27/00 009657 INFOLINK 22135, 07/27/00 010362 IRVINE PARK RAILROAD SUMMER CAMP EXCURSION .001-2111 001-1202-4201 001-2111 001-2111 001-3211 ' 001-210174317- 705-1210-4201. 705-1210-4201 001-1203-4201 001-4601-4308 ITEM AMOUNT 2,000.00 4,850.00. 394.80 1,200.00 750.00 950.00 290.00 365.00 3,370.00 325.00 10.54 24.61 450.00 60.00 952.00 1,659.50 40.00 30.00 135.90 500.00 300.00 45.00 60.00 215.00 175.00 10,224.00 9,300.00. 58.60 244.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 2,000.00 4,850.00 394.80 7,250.00 10.54 24.61 450.00 60.00 952.00 1,659.50 40.00 30.00 135.90 500.00 300.00 45.00 60.00 215.00 175.00 19,524.00 58.60 244.00 J. VOUCHRE2 07/27/00 18:00 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 22136 07/27/00 010334 GLEN JENSEN CITY OF HERMOSA.BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS. PAGE 4 22137 07/27/00 009454 LAUREN MARIKO KIM 22138 07/27/00 008675 NOLAN KIM ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER, ITEM AMOUNT INSTRUCTOR/SURF CAMP 2000 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/JUNE 2000 SCOREKEEPER ROLLER HOCKEY ROLLER HOCKEY REFEREE/6/25/00 22139 07/27/00 007859 L.A. CO METRO TRANS AUT BUS PASS SALES/JULY-2000 22140 07/27/00 '007267 .WILLIAM LADNIER 22141 07/27/00 010358 LINDA LARSON. 22142 07/27/00 000734 STEVE LEGARE 22143 07/27/00 003708 DENNIS LINDSEY 22144 07/27/00 008445 LITTLE CO OF MARY HOSPI 122145 07/27/00 010371 MIKE LITTLE CLASS REFUND/SUMMER 2000' CITATION REFUND LEVY OVERPAYMENT/MYRTLE/99/00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/JUNE 2000 'INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT/SUMMER 2000 EMERGENCY SERVICES/4/17/99 REFUND FORFEIT FEE/SPRING 2000- 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4601-4201 145-3403-4251 001-2111 110-3302 617-2252 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4221 001-2101-4201 001-2111 -- 908.82 42.00 48.00 126.00 196.00 42.00 250.00 819.00 477.28 2,147.76 2,469.50 CHECK AMOUNT 908.82 90.00 126.00 196.00 42.00 250.00 819.00, 2,625.04 2,469.50 22146 07/27/00 010156 LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 22147. 07/27/00 003397 LUTZ DEVELOPMENT REFUND DEMO PERMIT FEE 22148' 07/27/00 009563 BRIAN MARTINICH ROLLER HOCKEY REFEREE 22149 .07/27/00 007743 M. ANN MAY .CLASS REFUND 22150 07/27/00 008975 MOBIL FLEET GAS CARD CHARGES/JUNE 2000 22151 07/27/00 008217 JILL MURPHY _CLASS REFUND/SUMMER 2000 22152 07/27/00 007762 NEOPOST MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/00/01 INSTRUCTOR SURF CAMP/SUMMER 00 DEPOSIT/SENIOR EXCURSION 22153 07/27/00 008935 22154 07/27/00 010363 22155 07/27/00 002487 MELODIE NOETZLI OAK TREE RACING ASSOCIA PAGING NETWORK OF ORANG 07/27/00 010375 RANCE POW PAGER BILLING/JULY 2000 PAGER BILLING/JULY 2000 PAGER BILLING/JULY 2000 PAGER BILLING/JULY 2000 PAGER BILLING/JULY 2000 PAGER BILLING/JULY 2000 LEVY OVERPAYMENT/MYTLE 99/00 07/27/00 002980 POWER MAINTENANCE(CORPO SERVICE CONTRACT/UPS SYSTEM, 121-8621-4201. 160-862174201 001-3204 001-4601-4201 001-2111 715-2101-4310. 001-2111 001-1208-4201 001-4601-4221 001-4601-4201 73,988.37 6,471.00 001-2101-4201 001-2201-4201 001-1201-4201 001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 715-1206-4201 617-2252. 001-2101-4201. 22.40 96.00 285.00 5.00 42.00 1,917.52 454.41 235.00 71.16 2.50 2.50 15.00 35.00 2.50 819.00 3,072.00 80,459.37 22.40 96.00 285.00 5.00 42.00 1,917.52 454.41 235.00 128.66 819.00. VOUCHRE2 07/27/00 18:00 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 22158 07/27/00 010357 EDWIN RAMOS 22159 07/27/00 004800 VINCE RAY 22160 07/27/00 010366 THOMAS RICE 22161 07/27/00 005379 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS 22162 07/27/00. 009139 SECURED STORAGE 22163 07/27/00 009550 .NANCY SHERMAN 22164 07/27/00 009656 SHRED IT CALIFORNIA 22165 07/27/00 009775 BEAU SIMPSON 22166 07/27/00 000118 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COU 22167 07/27/00 008812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBL 22168 07/27/00 000171 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION SERVICE CONTRACT/UPS SYSTEM RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND INSTRUCTOR SURF CAMP/2000 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL BILLING/MAY 2000 BILLING/MAY 2000 BILLING/MAY 2000 ' BILLING/JUNE 2000 BILLING/JUNE 2000 BILLING/JUNE'2000 BILLING/JUNE 2000 BILLING/JUNE 200.0 BILLING/JUNE 2000 BILLING/JUNE 2000 BILLING/JUNE 2000 STORAGE CHARGES/3RD QTR 1999 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE DESTRUCTION SERVICES/JULY 00 DESTRUCTION'SERVICES/JULY 00 ROLLER HOCKEY REFEREE CITATION SUR CHARGE/JUNE 2000 SHARED PHONE LINE/POLICE'DEPT NEW SERVICE MONTGOMERY DR.. 22169 07/27/00 006511 SOUTHWEST SERVICE SOLUT OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE 22170 07/27/00 010370 JOSEPH SPORKIN MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 OFFICE MACHINE MAINT/2000-01 DISCOUNT OFFERED DISCOUNT TAKEN REFUND FORFEIT FEE/SPRING 2000 ACCOUNT NUMBER •001-2201-4201 001-2111 001-4601-4221 105-3105 ITEM AMOUNT PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 2,048.00 5,120.00 500.00 500.00 3,237.69 3,237.69 24.61 24.61 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131.4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131-4201 001-1131=4201 001-1131-4201 001-1121-4201. 105-3105 001-2101-4201 001-2101-4201 001-4601-4201 110-3302 715-2101-5403 105-2601-4201 001-1141-4201 001-1202-4201 110-1204-4201 001-1203-4201 001-1208-4201 110-3302-4201- . 001-4201-4201 •001-4601-4201 001-4202-4201 001-2201-4201 001-2101-4201 001-2021 001-2022 300.17 685.59 291.43 4,327.90 48.00 3,770.70 546.00 706.30 4,887.80 1,540.50 2,223.00 30.00 24.61 50.00 60.00 48.00 20,287.50 297.62 224.56 20.82 60.39 72.47 37.48 10.41 47.90 18.75 316.52 39.16 47.48 1,035.06 342.06 342.06- 19,327.39 30.00 24.61 110.00 48.00_ 20,287.50 297.62 224.56 1,706.44 001-2111 60.00 60.00 VOUCHRE2 07/27/00 18:00 VOUCHER/. CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 22171 07/27/00 005869 T2 SYSTEMS, INC. 22172 07/27/00. 001009 TOM THOMPSON 22173 07/27/00 006992 RALPH TOLLIVER 22174 ,07/27/00 010338 JOHAN TONDEUR 22175 07/27/00 000123- TRIANGLE HARDWARE CITYOF HERMOSA BEACH: VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER. FOR. ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION' . ANNUAL MAINT/CITE SOFTWARE`. MEALS/POST CLASS/7/17-19/2000 1999 ASSESSMENT REBATE CLASS REFUND/SUMMER 2000 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2000.- • HARDWARE PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 HARDWARE PURCHASE/MAY 2000 HARDWARE PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 22176. 07/27/00 009816 U.S. TRUST COMPANY,N.A. ASSESSMENT. PAYOFFS/MYRTLE ASSESSMENT PAYOFFS/LOMA_DR. 22177 07/27/00 010367 JAN..VASCONEZ 22178 '07/27/00 008767 WEST GROUP: 22179 07/27/00 010360 DAN WILSON CAMP REFUND/SUMMER 2000 CALIF JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 22180 07/27/00 001206 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES STREET SIGN PURCHASE/JUNE 2000 ACCOUNT NUMBER 715-1206-4201 001-2101-4312 105-3105 001-2111 • ITEM AMOUNT 7,675.00 CHECK AMOUNT 7,675.00 24.00 24.61 42.00 001-4204-4309' 105-2601-.4309 001-4204-4309 105-2601-4309 617-2253 618-2253 001-2111 001-1121-4201 001-2111 001-3104-4309 39.96 278.09 44.41 80.66 44,563.67 17,370.50 61,934.17 55.00 55.00 47.63 47.63 100.00 100.00 178.61 178.61 VOUCHRE2 07/27/00 18:00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 63,396.12 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 10,689.96 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 23,655.45 110 PARKING FUND 20,908.94 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 87,647.87 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 978.29 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 2,000.00 160 SEWER FUND 6,471.00 617, MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND 46,596.47 618 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND 17,370.50 705 INSURANCE FUND 19,524.00 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 8,251.97 307,490.57 VOUCHRE2 07/27/00 18:00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE EMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE CHECKS LISTED. ONPAGES( TO INCLUSIVE, OF THE VOUCHER REGISTER VA) FOR- �`--A7 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE BUDGET. BY 6141-49 FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE 60 -fwd PAGE 8 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council July27, 2000 For the Meeting of August 8, 2000. CANCELLATION OF CHECKS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the checks listed below: #21889 — 07/06/00 - $24.00 Det. Lance Jaakola Did not attend class. Check was never mailed. #21979 - 07/17/00 - $ 2,193.75 • Fleming & Assoc.. Check was issued to the mailed. wrong vendor. Check was never orkman, City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director August 3, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 NO MEETING Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of August 1, 2000 Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of August 15, 2000 July Activity Reports Community Resources Director Community Development Director All Departments Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of September 5 2000 Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of September 19, 2000 August Activity Reports Community Resources. Director Community Development Director All Departments JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of August 1, 2000 Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of August 15, 2000 July Activity Reports Community Resources Director Community Development Director All Departments Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of September 5 2000 Recommendation to receive and file action minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of September 19, 2000 August Activity Reports Community Resources. Director Community Development Director All Departments Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council August 3, 2000 Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS_ JUNE 2000 Attached are the preliminary June 2000 Revenue and Expenditure. Status Reports; these are not the final reports for the year, since many accounting adjustments must be made in July and August to "close the books." Totals for bothrevenue and expenditures will change when these entries are made. General Fund revenue is 101.1% received for 100% of the fiscal year. Parking Fund revenue is 97.5% received. General Fund expenditures are 88.6% and Parking Fund expenditures are 96.9% for 100% of the fiscal year. NOTED: Steph R. Burrell; City Manager Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland Finance. Director h:\b95\open\revexpjun.doc REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # 3100. 3101 3102 3103 3106 3107. 3108 3109 3110 3111 3112 3113 3114 3115 3120 3200 3202 3203 • 3204 3205 3206 3207 3209 3211 3212 3213 •3214 3215 3216 3217 3218 3225 DESCRIPTION TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED CURRENT YEAR, UNSECURED PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813 TRANSFER TAX SALES TAX 1/2 CENT SALES TX EXT CABLE TV FRANCHISE ELECTRIC FRANCHISE GAS FRANCHISE REFUSE FRANCHISE` TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY BUSINESS LICENSE . UTILITY USER TAX TAXES CITY OF'HERMOSA.BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000. (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED ESTIMATE 3,536,023.00 247,593.00 166,074.00 31,626.00 154,000.00 2,311,722.00 137;519.00 190,000.00 46,796.00 38,850.00 170,000.00 653,170.00 600,000.00 1,600,000.00 9,883,373.00 LICENSES AND PERMITS DOG LICENSES BICYCLE LICENSES BUILDING PERMITS ELECTRIC PERMITS PLUMBING PERMITS OCCUPANCY _PERMITS GARAGE SALES BANNER PERMITS ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS. ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 'AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT SPRAY BOOTH PERMIT OPEN FIRE PERMIT AUTO REPAIR PERMIT TAXICAB PERMITS LICENSES"AND PERMITS 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 3400 3401 3402 3403 3404 3405 10,201.00 100.00 340,340.00 46,000.00 40,250.00 6,000.00 100.00 6,300.00 200.00 2,600.00 600.00 340.00 125.00 350.00 2,400.00 25,000.00 480,906.00 205,000.00 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY INTEREST INCOME RENTS & CONCESSIONS PIER REVENUE COMM CTR LEASES COMM CTR RENTALS JUNE REVENUE 1999-00 REVENUE PAGE BALANCE % COL 495.00- 3,499,044.32 36,978.68 99.0 .00 244,019.23 3,573.77 98.6 14,161.03 145,923.56 20,150.44 87.9 13,470.65 75,561.00 43,935.00- 238.9 12,666.51 154,771.40 771.40-.100.5 301,040.51 2,293,813.41 17,908.59 99.2 13,995.67 118,349.14 19,169.86 86.1 49,384.77 150,344.14 39,655.86 79.1 .00 45,795.50 1,000.50 97.9 .00 39,294.52 444.52- 101.1 .00 137,154.54 32,845.46 80.7 .00 711,929.17 58,759.17- 109.0 84,245.41 568,501.36 31,498.64 94.8 144,528.06 1,658,418.84 58,418.84-103.7 632,997.61 9,842,920.13 40,452.87 99.6 149.50 10,483.50 42.00 84.00 25,693.79 373,186.23 11,678.00 63,237.00 4,804.00 50,425.75 874.00 8,490.00 21.00 93`00 1,505.00 7,065.00 .00 112.25 114.00 2,710.00 287.00 979.00 .00 - 383.00 .00 85.00 100.00 196.00 .00 2,630.00 3,015.00 48,090.00 48,283.29 568,249.73 282.50- 102.8 16.00 84.0 32,846.23- 109.7. 17,237.00- 137.5 10,175.75- 125.3 2,490.00-141.5 7.00 93.0 765.00--112.1 87.75 56.1 110.00- 104.2. 379.00- 163.2 43.00- 112.6 40.00 68.0 154.00 56.0 230.00-`109.6 23,090.00- 192.4 87,343.73- 118.2 12,264.31 222,600.00 6,416.98 188,377.92 1,181.00 ' 8.70 966.87 .00 .00.. .00 95,597.00 9,260.24 97,585.63 40,000.00 5,469.99 44,683.50 34,222.08 84.6 214.13 81.9 .00 1,988.63- 102.1 4,683.50- 111.7 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED ESTIMATE PAGE JUNE REVENUE 1999-00 REVENUE BALANCE % COL 3406 COMM CTR THEATRE 35,000.00 4,030.50 48,054.00 13,054.00- 137.3 3411 OTHER FACILITIES 18,000.00 1,706.00 19,706.50 1,706.50- 109.5 3412 TENNIS COURTS 10,000.00 1,507.50 11,894.75 1,894.75-.118.9 3418 SPECIAL EVENTS 50,000.00 26,459.00 .,_. 57,199.10 7,199.10- 114.4 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 513.00 323.96 1,773.64 1,260.64- 345.7 3460 UNREALIZED GAIN(LOSS) ON INV .00 .00 10.24 10.24 *** 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 2,993.00 307.25- 3,510.08- 517.08 117.3 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 469,898.00 54,875.62 466,721.59 3,176.41 99.3 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 347.00 .00 347.82 .82- 100.2 3505 IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 900,000:00 87,819.86 947,870.58 47,870.58- 105.3 3507 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 9;800.00 . .00 7,555.32 2,244.68 77.1 3508 MANDATED COSTS 26,576.00 26.00 22,115.00 4,461.00 83.2 3509 HOMEOWNR PROP TX RELIEF 62,000.00 9,718.71 64,791.44 2,791.44- 104.5 3510 POST 10,000.00 .00 9,030.38 969.62 90.3 3511 STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 5,750.00 .00 862.50 4,887.50 15.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 1,014,473.00 97,564.57 1,052,573.04 38,100.04- 103.8 3800 3801 3802 3803 3805 3806 3808 3809 3810 3811 3812 3813 3814 3815 3818 3819 3821 3823 3825 3827 3831 3833 3834 3837 3838 3839 3840 CURRENT. SERVICE CHARGES RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 13,500.00 2,116.00 16,992.00 3,492.00- 125.9 SIGN REVIEW; 2,275.00 465.00 2,602.00 327.00- 114:4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 2,010.00 .00 - 1,029.00 981.00 51.2 CONDTL USE PERMIT AMEND 1,850.00 372.00 1,851.00 1.00- 100.1 BOARD OF APPEALS 170.00 .00 .00 170.00 0.0 ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW 8,575.00 .00 7,500.00 1,075.00 87.5 TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW .00 .00 1,070-00 1,070.00- *** FINAL MAP REVIEW 4,590.00 1,044.00 5,469.00 879.00- 119.2 ZONE CHANGE/GEN PLAN AMEND 4,188.00 .00 1,396.00 2,792.00 33.3 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 28,112.00 3,660.00 28,123.00 11.00- 100.0 PLAN CHECK FEES 272,200.00 11,005.20 244,336.40 27,863.60 89.8 PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL 368.00 188.00 1,116.00 748.00- 303.3 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 8,000.00 • 2,156.00 12,061.63 4,061.63- 150.8 POLICE SERVICES 4,000.00 186.00 2;727.12 1,272.88 68.2 JAIL SERVICES 15,000.00 2,900.00 23,984.00 8,984.00- 159.9 FINGERPRINT SERVICE 1,152.00 .00 1,152.00 .00 100.0 SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 35,000.00 10,854.00 35,168.00 168.00- 100.5 PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 32.00 16.00 96.00 64.00- 300.0 LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 6,900.00 .00 6,601.00 299.00 95.7 STREET CUT INSPECTION 50,000.00. 3,957.00 60,627.10 10,627.10- 121.3 RECREATION SERVICE. CHARGES 5,500.00 339.46 5,252.33 247.67 95.5 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 57,000.00 5,158.05 60,541.10 3,541.10- 106.2 RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 700.00 60.00 470.00 230.00 67.1 SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIONS 150.00 6.00 135.55 14.45 90.4 PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 800.00 71.10 688-01 111.99 86.0 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 100,000.00 8,502.23 103,787.19 3,787.19- 103.8 08/02/00 06:48:36 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # 3841 3845 3857 3858 3859 3862 3863 3864 3866 3867 3868 3869 3870 3878 3881 3882 3883 3884 3886 3888 3890 3893 3894 3896 3897 3898 3899 3900 3901 3902 3903 3904 3909 3920 3955 3956 DESCRIPTION. POLICE TOWING. FINGERPRINTS/TAXICABS PKG PLAN APPLICATION TENANT, REFUSE BILLING REFUSE LIEN FEE ALARM PERMIT FEE FALSE ALARM FEE C.U.P../FENCES/WALLS NONCONFORMING REMODELS PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT 2ND PARTY RESPONSE LEGAL'DETERMINATION HEARING REINSPECTION FEE ROLLR HOCKEY RINK RENT INS SPEC EVENT SECURITY/FIRE FINAL/TENT MAP EXTNSION .LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TEXT AMENDMENT PRIVATE PLANNING. COMM APPEALS 300'RADIUS NOTCG/APL CC CONTR RECREATION CLASSES OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS MAILING FEE ADMIN.FEE,INS CERTIF HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION C.U.P.' MINOR AMEND. CURRENT SERVICE -.CHARGES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED ESTIMATE OTHER REVENUE SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS LATE FEE BCHD HEALTHY CITIES FUND OPERATING TRANSFERS.IN RESDL EQUITY TRSFR IN OTHER REVENUE REVENUE CONTROL GENERAL FUND 25,000.00 460.00 3,210.00 150.00 1,573.00. 2,000.00, 1,000.00 217.00 7,610.00 36,400.00 27,896.00 100.00 .00 1,000.00 325.00 500.00 522.00 1,198.00 517.00 1,500.00 2,300.00 240,000.00. 40,000.00 7.00 11.00 .00 105.00 1,015,673.00 1,000.00 1,254.00 1,020,670.00 4,911.00. .00 55,500.00 1,108,944.00.. 4,939.00 2,197,218.00 2;214.00 .00 '.00 11.00 .00 210.00 .00 .00 779.00 2,662.00 3,170.00 .00 .00 .00 30.00 3,816.00 . .00 .00 .00 .00 230.00. 16,271.38 4,005.00 .00 885.10 .00 .00 87,339.52 25,946.00- 460.00 4,280.00 143.00 27,945.42 2,002.00 1,389.00 .00 9,348.00 37,020.00 27,896.00 130.68 1,160.00 811.00 65.00- ,,4,009.00 522.00 1,198.00 517.00 .00 3,632.00 226,407.06 41,756.15 6.50 2,864.15.. 372.00 .00 1,044,525.39 946.00- 103.8 .00 100.0. 1,070.00- 133.3. 7.00 95:3 26,372.42-"999.9+''. 2.00- 100.1 389.00- 138.9 217.00 0.0 1,738.00- 122.8 620.00- 101.7 .00 100.0 30.68- 130.7 1,160.00 *** 189.00 81.1 390.00 20.0- 3,509.00- 801.8 .00 100.0 .00 100.0 .00 100.0 1,500.00 0.0 1,332.00- 157.9 13,592.94 94.3 1,756.15- 104.4 .50 92.9 2,853..15-.999.9+ 372.00- *** 105.00 0.0 28,852.39- 102.8 .00 988.20 .00 43,393.51 12,750.00. 1,066,618.00 9,853.70- 5,733.14 .00 .53 .00 31,796.13 102,174.88 1,122,963.00 .00 4,938.77 105,071.18 2,276,431.28 15,266,541.00 1,038,396.10 15,433,701.87 15,266,541.00 11.80 98.8 42,139.51- 999.9+ 45,948.00- 104.5. 822.14- 116.7 .53- *** 23,703.87 57.3 14,019.00-.101.3• .23 100.0 79,213.28. 103.6 167,160.87- 101.1 1,038,396.10 15,433,701.87 167,160.87- 101.1 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3100 3101 3103 3105 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS ASSESSMENT REBATES TAXES 3400 USE'OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM. USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED ESTIMATE JUNE 1999-00 BALANCE % COL REVENUE REVENUE 444,029.00 .00 430,978.27 ' 13,050.73 97.1 12,000.00 .00 12,975.36 975.36- 108.1 4,000.00- 344.54- 3,297.74- 702.26 82.4 452,029.00 344.54- 440,655.89 11,373.11 97.5 38,175.00 657.54 28,664.52 9,510.48 75.1 87.00 33.20 243.15 156.15 279.5 514.00- 31.49- 544.58 30.58 105.9. 37,748.00 659.25 28,363:09 9,384.91 75.1 REVENUE CONTROL LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 489,777.00 469,018.98 20,758.02 95.8 20,758.02 95.8 08/02/00 06:48:36 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3400 " USE OF. MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3413 PARKING LOT LEASE:' 3420 OTHER INTEREST INCOME 3430 IN -LIEU PARKING FEES 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 5 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999700 BALANCE / COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 47,180.00 114,608.00 18,040.00 .00 109.00 634.00- 179,303.00 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3815 PUBLIC. WORKS SERVICES 3844 LOT A -REVENUE 3846 NO PIER PKG STRUCTURE REVENUE CURRENT SERVICE.CHARGES 3900 3902 OTHER REVENUE REFUNDS/REIMB/PREV YEARS REVENUE CONTROL - DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 736.13 28,860.39 18,319.61 61.2 .00 113,341.22 1,266.78 98.9 1,358.67 92.5 62,500.00- *** 126.99- 216.5 49.22- 92.2 41,731.15- 123.3 297.14 62,500.00 37.17 35.26- 63,535.18 16,681.33 62,500.00 235.99 584.78- 221,034.15 5,000.00 .00 2,000.00. 3,000.00 40.0 114,425.00 22,073:35 86,856.95 .27,568.05 75.9 259,620.00 52,656.00 186,190.50 73,429.50 71.7, 379,045.00 74,729.35 275,047.45 -: 103,997.55 72.6 500.00- 350.0 200.00 .00 700.00 558,548.00 138,264.53 496,781.60 : 61,766.40 88.9 558,548.00 138,264.53 496,781.60 61,766.40 ' 88.9 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 110 PARKING FUND ACCOUNT. # .3300 3302' COURT FINES/PARKING • DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE FINES & FORFEITURES BALANCE % COL 814,240.00 37,763.00 734,424.95 79,815.05 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3842 PARKING METERS 3843 PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL 3844 DAILY PARKING PERMITS 3848 DRIVEWAY PERMITS 3849 GUEST PERMITS 3850 CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3900 OTHER REVENUE, BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN REVENUE CONTROL PARKING FUND 6,747.00 172.78 4,591.64 2,155.36 68.1 16.00 8.72 55.61 39.61- 347.6 91.00- 8.27- 111.02- 20.02 122.0 6,672.00 173.23 4,536.23 2,135.77 68.0 740,000.00 87,300.76 757,308.93 17,308.93- 102.3 250,000.00 11,511.00 267,081.00 17,081.00- 106.8 700.00 48.00 636.00 64.00 90.9 500.00 96.00 536.00 36.00- 107.2 1,200.00 271.00 1,664.00 464.00- 138.7 4,000.00 840.00 5,559.00 1,559.00- 139.0 996,400.00 100,066.76 1,032,784.93 36,384.93- 103.7 1,281.00 .00 1,281.00 .00 100.0 1,818,593.00 138,002.99 ' 1,773,027.11 45,565.89 97.5 1,818,593.00 138,002.99 1,773,027.11 45,565.89 97.5 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION• 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 ' INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY &-PROPERTY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 4,770.00 11.00 64.00- 4,717.00 85.66 4.32 4.10- 85.88 3,890.44 32.56 75.05- 3,847.95 879.56 81.6 21.56- 296.0 11.05 117.3 869.05 81.6 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION' 76,484.00 - 16,659.14 74,051:45 '2,432.55 96:8, 3502 SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 143,702.00 34,089.87 156,130.48 12;428.48- 108.6, 3503 SECT 2107.5 ALLOCATION' 4,000.00 .00 4,000.00 .00 100.0 3512 SECTION 2105 (PROP 111), 115,450,00 25,651.48 117,281.58 1,831.58- 101.6 3522 TDA ARTICLE 3/LOCAL 15,779.00 22,742.00 - 22;742.00 6;963.00- 144.1, INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 355,415.00 99,142.49 374,205,51. 18,790:51- 105.3 REVENUE CONTROL 360,132.00 99,228.37 378,053:46 17,921.46-.105.0 STATE GAS TAX FUND 360,132.00. 99,228.37 378,053.46 17,921.46- 105.0 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA,BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 117 AB939 FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 15,391.00 322.87 11,517.00 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 36.00 16.31 99.89 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 207.00- 15.47- 220.93 - USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 15,220:00 323.71. 11,395.96 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3860 'AB939 SURCHARGE 61,797.00 .00 46,035.07 REVENUE CONTROL 77,017.00 323.71 57,431.03 AB939 FUND 77,017.00 323.71 57,431.03 PAGE BALANCE % COL 3,874.00 74.8 63.89- 277.5 13.93 106.7 3,824.04 74.9 15,761.93 74.5 19,585.97 74.6 19,585.97 74.6 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # 3400 3401 3450 3475 DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT • JUNE 2000 (100:0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 9 BALANCE % COL USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY INTEREST INCOME 2,633:00 18.51 873:31 1,759.69 33.2 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 6.00 .94 10.58 4.58- 176.3 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 35.00 .89- 28.21- 6.79- 80.6 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,604.00 18.56 855.68 1,748.32 32.9 REVENUE CONTROL COUNTY GAS TAX FUND. 2,604.00 18.56 2,604.00 18.56 855.68 1,748.32 32.9 855.68 1,748.32 32.9 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3606 LA CO PRKS/PIER RENOVATION 969,664.00 .00 40,579.00 929,085.00 4.2 3608 MAINTENANCE ALLOCATION 19,097.00 .00 .00 19,097.00 0.0 3610 CO. LIFEGUARD AGREEMENT 942,939.00 .00 365,909.40 577,029.60 38.8 3611 PROP A DISCRETIONARY FUNDS 102,285.00 .00 .00 102,285.00 0.0 3615 HERMOSA BEACH BIKE PATH 389;414.00 .00 .00 389,414.00 0.0 3616 CDS CLARIFIER UNIT REIMB 367,761.00 .00 .00 367,761.00 0.0 3617 CATCH BASIN INSERTS REIMB 56,250.00 .00 .00 56,250.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 2,847,410.00 .00 406,488.40 2,440,921.60 14.3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT, JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED ESTIMATE OTHER REVENUE REFUNDS/REIMS-PREVIOUS YEARS REVENUE CONTROL PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 22,250.00 2,869,660.00 2,869,660.00 22,250.00 0.0 406,488.40 2,463,171.60 14.2 406,488.40 2,463,171.60 14.2 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA'BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0%0F BUDGET YEAR) 125 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 3116 3400 3401 3450 3475 3900 3910 TAXES PARK REC FACILITY TAX, USE PF MONEY & PROPERTY INTEREST INCOME INVESTMENT DISCOUNT INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY OTHER REVENUE PARK/RECREATION IN -LIEU REVENUE CONTROL PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND PAGE 11 BALANCE % COL 21,000.00 .00 35,000.00 14,000.00- 166.7 36,989.00 870.80 29,811.68 7,177.32 .80.6 85.00 43.97 254.97 169.97- 300.0 497.00 41.70- 550.34- 53.34 110.7 36,577.00 873.07 29,516.31 7,060.69 80.7 155,160.00 .00 154,692.00 468.00 99.7 212,737.00 873.07 219,208.31 6,471.31- 103.0 212,737.00. 873.07 219,208:31 6,471.31- 103.0 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36, 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND ACCOUNT.# DESCRIPTION 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY. & PROPERTY REVENUE CONTROL 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 12 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE BALANCE % COL 32,084.00 472.06 19,540.75 .12,543.25 60.9` 74.00 23.83 175.81 101.81- 237.6_ 431.00- 22.60- 417.94- 13:06- 97.0 31,727.00 473.29 19,298.62 12,428.38 60.8 31,727.00 473.29 19,298.62 12,428.38 60.8 12,428.38 60.8 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0%.OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE, 13 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT. FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 BALANCE / COL., ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE. 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 9,228.00 182.22 6,874.38 2,353.62 74:5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 21.00 9.21 58.05 37.05- 276.4 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 124.00- 8.73- 130.40- 6.40 105.2' USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 9,125.00" 182.70 6,802.03 2,322.97 74.5 REVENUE CONTROL 9,125.00 182.70 6,802.03 2,322.97 74..5 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 9,125.00: 182.70' 6,802.03 2,322.97 74.5 REVPRIN2 \08102/00 06:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 137 MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE BALANCE % COL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3900 OTHER REVENUE SPEC ASSESSMENT ADMIN FEES REVENUE CONTROL MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 5.26 84.78 4,378.00 4,378.00 4,378.00 .00. 4,377.03 5.26 4,461.81 5.26. 4,461.81 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 08/02/00 06:48:36 REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 138 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 3401 3900 3925 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY INTEREST INCOME OTHER REVENUE SPEC ASSESSMENT ADMIN FEES REVENUE CONTROL LOMA DIST ADMIN` EXP FUND PAGE 15 BALANCE % COL .00 6.72 107.50 107.50- 5,533.00 5,533.00 5,533.00 .00 5,532.08 6.72 I5,639.58 6.72 5,639.58 *** .92 100.0 106.58- 101.9 106.58- 101.9 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 .(100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 16 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT. ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 BALANCE - % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3720 AMER DISAB ACT 296,856.00 REVENUE CONTROL 296,856.00 `COMMUNITY DEV .00 624.00 296,232.00 0.2 .00 624.00 296,232.00 0.2 0.2 REVPRIN2' 08/02/00 06:48:36 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 17 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00. BALANCE %.COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3117 PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 220,200.00 19,857.55 208,511.62 11,688.38 94.7 3121 SUBREGIONAL INCENTIVES 29,000.00 .00 14,048.10 14,951.90 48.4 TAXES 249,200.00 19,857.55 222,559..72 26,640.28 89.3 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 4,479.00 53.00 2,246.78 2,232.22 50.2 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 10.00 2.68 19.39 9.39- 193.9 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 60.00- 2.54- 50.33- 9.67- 83.9 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 4,429.00 53.14 2,215.84 2,213.16 50.0 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3854 FARES,DIAL A RIDE 11,500.00 .00 8,365.51 3,134.49 72.7. 3855 BUS PASSES 1,200.00 89.60 900.80 299.20 75.1 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 12,700.00 89.60 9,266.31 3,433.69 73.0 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3916 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 11,550.00 .00 .00 11,550.00 0.0, REVENUE CONTROL 277,879.00 20,000.29 234,041.87 43,837.13 84.2 PROPOSITION 'A. FUND 277,879.00 20,000.29 234,041.87 43,837.13 84.2 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3100 TAXES 3118 3400 3401 3450 3475 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED ESTIMATE JUNE REVENUE 1999-00 REVENUE PROP C LOCAL RETURN FDS USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY INTEREST INCOME INVESTMENT DISCOUNT INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 183,620.00 16,589.80 45,723.00 106.00 615.00- 45,214.00 1,030.51• 52.03 49.35- .1,033:19 173,703.31 36,231.37 308.03 671.50- 35,867.90 PAGE 18 BALANCE % COL 9,916.69 94.6 9,491.63 79.2 202.03- 290.6 56.50 109.2 9,346.10 79.3 .228,834.00 17,622.99 209,571.21 19,262.79. 91.6 17,622.99 209,571.21 19,262.79 91.6 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH' REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR). PAGE 19 150 GRANTS FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE ., - 1999=00 BALANCE / COL ESTIMATE REVENUE..REVENUE 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3545 COASTAL CONSERVANCY GRANT 100,000.00 .00 .00 100,000.00 0.0 3546 COASTAL AUTHORITY GRANT 23,166.00 .00 14,625.23 8,540.77 63.1 3550 CA WASTE OIL RECYCLING GRANT 8,959.00 .00 8,958.50 .50 100.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 132,125.00 .00 23,583.73 108,541.27 17.8 3700 3732 3735 3800 3847 3900 3930 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL STPL ST IMPROVEMENT REIMB 35,412.00 .00 .00 35,412.00 0.0 FEMA/16TH ST STORM DRAIN IMP 1,287,800.00 .00 .00 1,287,800.00 0.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 1,323,212.00 _00 .00 1,323,212.00 0.0 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES PARKING STRUCTURE EASEMENT 1,100,000.00 .00 1,100,000.00, .00 100.0 OTHER REVENUE BCHD DOM VIOLENCE ADV GRANT 20,000.00 .00 .00 20,000.00 0.0 REVENUE CONTROL 2,575,337.00 .00 1,123,583.73 1,451,753.27 43.6 GRANTS FUND 2,575,337.00 .00 1,123,583.73 1,451,753.27 43.6 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT . JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF. BUDGET YEAR) 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT '3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3538 AQMD EMISSION CTL AB276 20,405.00 5,488.22 15,877.16 4,527.84 77.8` 355.1. MSRC DISCR MATCHING FUNDS .00 .00 10,157.00 10,157.00- *** INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 20,405.00 5,488.22 26,034.16 5,629.16- 127.6:' ADJUSTED ESTIMATE 302.00 1.00 4.00- 299.00 JUNE 1999-00 REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 20 BALANCE % COL 6.72 251.66 50.34 83.3 .34 2.18 1.18- 218.0 .32- 4.64- .64 116.0 6.74 249.20 49.80 83.3 REVENUE CONTROL 26,283.36 5,579.36- 126.9 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 153- SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) CITY .0F HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000- (100.0% OF 000- (100.0%"OF BUDGET YEAR), PAGE 21 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3100 TAXES 3135 C.O.P.S. ALLOCATION 43,080.00 .00 43,079.59 .41 100.0''. 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 2,929.00 19.60 1,685.10 1,243.90 57.5 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 7.00 .98 10.29 3.29- 147.0 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM 39.00- .93 31.75 7.25 81.4 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 2,897.00 19.65 1,663.64 1,233.36 57.4 REVENUE CONTROL 45,977.00 19.65 • 44,743.23 1,233.77 97.3 SUPP LAW ENF, SERV (SLESF) 45,977.00 19.65 44,743.23 1,233.77 97.3 REVPRIN2. 08/02/00 06:48:36 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION' 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3460 UNREALIZED GAIN(LOSS).ON INV 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY REVENUE CONTROL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) PAGE 22 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE .00 .00 10.24 " 10.24- .00 .00 .80- .80 .00 .00 9.44, 9.44- CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 9:44 9.44- 9.44 9.44- 08/02/00 06:48:36 SEWER FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY 3602 BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANCE . 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 SEWER CONNECTION FEE, 3829 SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 3832 SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN CURRENT SERVICE -CHARGES 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3904 _ GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OTHER REVENUE REVENUE CONTROL .SEWER FUND CITY. OF HERMOSA.BEACH REVENUE`STATUS REPORT' JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 23 BALANCE % COL 146,898.00 3,149.61 112,694,80 34,203.20 76.7 . 339.00 159:01 959.92 620.92- 283.2 1,975:00- 150.81- 2;113.93- 138:93 107.0` 145,262.00 .3,157.81 111,540.79 33,721.21 76.8- 5;000.00 .00 3,575.50 1,424.50 71.5 35,556.00 .00 52,122.78 16,566.78- 146.6 8;000.00 348.00 11,022.00 3,022.00- 137.8 5,000.00 174.00 6,082.00 1,082.00- 121.6 48,556.00 522:00 69,226.78 20,670.78- 142.6 840.00 700,000.00 700,840.00 .00 58,333.61 58,333.61 840.00 700,000.00 700,840.00 .00 100.0 .00 100.0 .00 100.0 899,658.00 62,013.42 885,183.07 14,474.93 98.4 899,658.00 62,013.42 885,183.07 14,474.93 98.4 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3304 FORFEITED FUNDS 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME . 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY REVENUE CONTROL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED ESTIMATE 10,000.00 8,964.00 21.00 120.00- 8,865.00 JUNE REVENUE 1999-00 REVENUE PAGE 24 BALANCE % COL. .00 8,579.48 1,420.52 85.8 150.28 7.59 7.19- 150.68 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 6,142.27 50.92 119.88- 6,073.31 2,821.73 68.5 29.92- 242.5 .12- 99.9 2,791.69 68.5 14,652.79 4,212.21 77.7 150.68 14,652.79 .4,212.21 77.7 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3400. USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 'INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY &-PROPERTY 3900 3912 OTHER REVENUE FIRE FLOW FEE REVENUE CONTROL. FIRE, PROTECTION FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE' 21,958.00 51.00 295.00- 21,714.00 110,000.00 131,714.00 131,714.00 482.95 -. 24.38 23.12- 484.21 1,542.50 2,026.71 2,026.71 17,409.31 148.56 323.87- 17,234.00 135,801.00 153,035.00. 153,035.00 PAGE 25 BALANCE % COL 4,548.69 79.3 97.56- 291.3 28.87 109.8 4,480.00 79.4 25,801.00- 123.5 21,321.00- 116.2 21,321.00- 116.2 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST TNCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN REVENUE CONTROL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 30,680.00 71.00 412.00- 30,339.00 492,460.00 522,799.00 522,799.00 1,130.87 57.09 54.15- 1,133.81 237,268.61 238,402.42 238,402.42. 34,624.81 276.05 . 561.07 34,339.79 492,460.00 526,799.79 3,944.81- 112.9,` 205.05- 388.8 149.07 136.2 4,000.79- 113.2 .00 100.0 4,000.79- 100.8 526,799.79 4,000.79- 100.8, '-REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 08/02/00 06:48:36 REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE, 2000 (100.0/ OE BUDGET YEAR) 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND ACCOUNT #. 3400 3401 3450 3475 DESCRIPTION USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY INTEREST INCOME INVESTMENT DISCOUNT INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY REVENUE CONTROL LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 4,387.00 10.00 59.00- 4,338.00 4,338.00 4,338.00 68.97 3.48 3.29- 69.16 2,810.23 24.05. 57.30- 2,776.98 PAGE 27 BALANCE % COL 1,576.77 64.1 14.05- 240.5 1.70- 97.1 1,561.02 64.0 69.16 2,776.98 1,561.02 64.0 69.16 2,776.98 1,561.02 64.0 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 08/02/00. 06:48:36 REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3936 CONTRIB FROM PROPERTY OWNERS 1,066,385.00 ' .00 1,066,385.36 3940 CASH PMTS/UTIL UNDERGROUNDING ` 449,359.00 8,600.56- 440,758.41 OTHER REVENUE 1,515,744.00 8,600.56- 1,507,143.77 7,681.27- 1,555,444.66 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE JUNE REVENUE 1999-00 REVENUE PAGE 28 BALANCE % COL. 55,494.00 916.90 48,332.83 7,161.17 87.1 128.00 46.29 265.94 137.94- 207.8 746.00- 43.90- 297.88- 448.12- 39.9 54,876.00 919.29 48,300.89 6,575.11 88.0 REVENUE CONTROL MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND .36- 100.0 8,600.59 98.1 8,600.23 99.4 15,175.34 99.0 1,555,444.66 15,175.34 99.0 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 308 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3400 - USE OF MONEY &,PROPERTY 3401 " INTEREST INCOME 3450 INVESTMENT DISCOUNT 3475 INVESTMENT PREMIUM USE OF MONEY &PROPERTY 3900 OTHER REVENUE. 3936 CONTRIB FROM PROPERTY OWNERS 3940 CASH PMTS/UTIL UNDERGROUNDING :3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OTHER REVENUE REVENUE CONTROL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF. BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 61,074.00 141.00 821.00- 60,394.00 1,218,681.00 457,257.00 8,861.00 1,684,799.00 899.84 46,125.62 45.43 225.18 43.09- 247.42- 902.18 46,103.38 .00 1,218,681.27 .00 457,257.06 .00 8,860.86 .00 1,684,799.19 PAGE 29 BALANCE % COL 14,948.38 75.5 84.18- 159.7 573.58- 30.1 14,290.62 76.3 .27- 100.0 .06- 100.0 .14 100.0 .19-. 100.0 1,745,193.00 902.18 1,730,902.57 14,290.43 LOMA UTIL,:UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND 1,745,193.00 99.2- 902.18 1,730,902.57 14,290.43 99.2 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 610 LWR PIER DIST REDEMPTION FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED ESTIMATE. JUNE REVENUE 3400 _ USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY . 3401 INTEREST -INCOME REVENUE CONTROL LWR PIER DIST REDEMPTION FUND 1999-00 REVENUE 447.09 447.09 447.09 BALANCE % COL 289.09- 283.0 289.09- 283.0 289.09- 283.0 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF. BUDGET YEAR) PAGE .31 617 MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 BALANCE % COL ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE 3400 3401 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY INTEREST INCOME -REVENUE CONTROL MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND 632.00 632.00 632.00 -146.10 146.10 146.10 2,588.83 2,588.83 2,588.83 1,956.83- 409.6 1,956.83- 409.6 1,956.83- 409.6 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 618 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE • REVENUE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 INTEREST INCOME 525.00 122.33 1,880.93 REVENUE CONTROL 525..00 122.33 1,880.93 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND 525.00 122.33 1,880:93 PAGE 32 BALANCE % COL 1,355.93- 358:3 1,355.93- 358.3-: 1,355.93- 358.3 REVPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE 33 08/02/00. 06:48:36 REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 705 INSURANCE FUND ACCOUNT # 3800 3880 3900 3902 3955 DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE. BALANCE 7 COL CURRENT SERVICECHARGES INSURANCE SERVICE CHARGES 1,075,632.00 88,821.00 1,065,632.00 10,000.00 99.1 OTHER REVENUE REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR OPERATING TRANSFERS -.IN OTHER REVENUE REVENUE CONTROL 3,451.00 .00 3,450.95 .05 100.0 100,000.00 58,333.35 100,000.00 .00 100.0 103,451.00 58,333.35 103,450.95 .05 100.0 1,179,083.00 147,154.35 1,169,082.95 10,000.05 99.2 INSURANCE. FUND 1,179,083.00 147,154.35 1,169,082.95 10,000.05 99.2 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED ' ESTIMATE 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3889 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 SALE OF REAL/PERS PROPERTY 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OTHER REVENUE REVENUE CONTROL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND PAGE 34 JUNE REVENUE 1999-00 REVENUE' BALANCE % COL 675,243.00 56,262.00 675,243.00 16,850.00 .00 22,610.00 5,760.00- 134.2 39,773.00 2,916.44 39,773.00 .00 100.0. 56,623.00 2,916.44 62,383.00 5,760.00- 110.2 731;866.00 59,178.44 737,626.00 5,760.00- 100.8 731,866.00 59,178.44 737,626.00 5,760.00- 100.8 REVPRIN2 08/02/00 06:48:36 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION CITY. OF HERMOSA BEACH. ( REVENUE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 (100.0% OF BUDGET YEAR) ADJUSTED JUNE; 1999-00 ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE PAGE 35 BALANCE % COL REVENUE CONTROL 31,957,410.00 1,961,736.38 27,690,045.984,267,364.02 86.6 GRAND TOTALS 31,957,410.00 1,961,736.38 27,690,045.98 4,267,364.02 86.6 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 1100 LEGISLATIVE 1101 CITY COUNCIL 1101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES, 24,288.00 2,024.50 24,294.09 .00 6.09- 100.0 1101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 522.00 .00 .00 .00 522.00 0.0 1101-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 39,000.00 3,250.00 39,305.52 .00 305.52- 100.8 1101-4180 RETIREMENT 2,898.00 241.56 2,908.49 .00 10.49- 100.4 1101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 37,598.00 2,387.87 32,505.80 .00 5,092.20 86:5 1101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,401.00 116.76 1,405.65 .00 4.65- 100.3 PERSONAL SERVICES 105,707.00 8,020.69 100,419.55 .00 5,287.45 95.0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS -REPORT JUNE, 2000 PAGE ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 'ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP'-- EXPEND EXPEND 1101-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES , 1101-4201. CONTRACT-SERV/PRIVATE 1101-4300 1101-4304 1101-4305 1101-4315 1101-4317 1101-4319 1101-4390 1101-4396 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER TELEPHONE 400.00 6.29 108.22 .00 291.78 27.1 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6,000.00 597.66 7,957.42 :00 1,957.42- 132.6 MEMBERSHIP 10,300.00 .00 10,157.00 .00 143.00 98.6 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 9,000.00 421.00 6,943.71 .00 2,056.29 77.2 SPECIAL EVENTS ' 5,865.00' 250.61 5,015.49 .00 849.51 85.5 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 31,434.00 2,625.00 31,434.00 00 .00 100.0 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 25,486.00 2,122.00 25,486.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 88,485.00 6,022.56 87,101.84 .00 1,383.16 98.4 CITY COUNCIL 197,992.00 13,800.75 194,400.14 .00 3,591.86: 98.2 3,800.00 242.50- 6,878.75 -00 3,078.75- 181.0 1121 CITY CLERK, 1121-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1121-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 45,288.00 '3,774.00 45,288.00 1121-4111, ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,402.00 '.00 1,524.12- 1121-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 41,568.00 3,166.22 , 41,473.86 1121-.4180 RETIREMENT 5,089.00 424.02 5,088.24 1121-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,242.00 497.08. 6;002:68 1121-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,515.00 100.63 1,280.14 PERSONAL SERVICES 101,104.00 7,961.95' 100,657.04 1121-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1121-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE_ 1121-4251 CONTRACT. SERVICES/GOV'T CONTRACT SERVICES 13,350.00 1,328.84 7,849.73 50,000.00 .00 27,256.92 63,350.00 1,328.84 35,106.65 1121-4300. MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1121-4304 TELEPHONE 690.00 31.04 253.16 1121-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,500.00__ 292.01 4,915.40 1121-4315 MEMBERSHIP 325.00 .00 270.00. 1121-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 2,700.00 .00 1,159.90 1121-4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 9,950.00 4,033.64 10,655.94 .76 239.32 234.86 446.96 4,241.86 68.2 22,743.08 54.5 26,984.94 57.4 436.84 36.7 415.40--109.2 55.00 83.1 1,540.10 43.0 705.94- 107.1 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT #. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT. JUNE 2000 DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APPROP JUNE EXPEND 1999-00 EXPEND 1121-4390• COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 5,688.00 474.00 5,688.00 1121-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 3,366.00 286.00 3,366.00 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 27,219.00 5,116.69 26,308.40`. 1121-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1121-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1121-5402 _ EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE CITY CLERK 1131 1131-4200 1131-4201 CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1131-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1131-4304 TELEPHONE 1131-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER CITY ATTORNEY 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR 1132-4100' PERSONAL SERVICES 1132-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,500.00 2,556.00 4,056.00 195,729.00 .00 .00- .00 14,407.48 .00 .00 .00 162,072.09 ENCUMB. BALANCE %USED .00 .00 100.0 .00 .00 100.0 .00 910.60 96.7 .00 .00 .00 1,258.41 1,500.00 2,556.00 4,056.00 32,398.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.4 300.00 7.74 66.23 .00 233.77 22.1 100.00 3.20 41.51 .00 58.49 . 41.5 400.00 10.94 107.74 .00 292.26 26.9 210,400.00 33,957.23 114,982.40 .00 95,417.60 54.6. 1132-4200' 1132-4201 2,975.00 235.10 2,845.73 .00 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1132-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1132-4304 TELEPHONE - 1132-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES. 1132-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1132-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER CITY PROSECUTOR 129.27 98,840.00 12,640.00 85,184.95 .00 • 13,655.05 95.7 86.2 300.00 15.53 102.94 .00 197.06 34.3 520.00 51.96 51.96 .00 468.04 10.0 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 0.0 400.00 .00 130.00 .00 270.00 32.5 1,320.00 67.49 284.90 .00 1,035.10 21.6 103,135.00 12,942.59 88,315.58 .00 14,819.42 85.6 1141 CITY TREASURER 1141-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1141-4102REGULAR SALARIES 20,437.00 1,703.10 20,436.05 .00 .95 100.0 1141-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 .00 14.74 .00 14.74- *** 1141-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 755.00 .00 .00 .00 755.00 0.0 1141-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 16,464.00 1,325.50 15,906.00 .00 558.00 . 96.6 1141-4180 RETIREMENT 2,764.00 226.86 2,722.18 .00 41.82 98.5 1141-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,316.00 614.56 7,254.75 .00 61.25 99.2 1141-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 535.00 43.92 527.62 .00 7.38 98.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 48,271.00 3,913.94 46,861.34 .00 1,409.66 97.1 1141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 1141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 3,914.00 208.33 1141-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1141-4304 TELEPHONE 745.00 124.16 746.01 1141-4305 OFFICE APER SUPPLIES 1',942.00 452.19 1,949.52 114174315 MEMBERSHIP 100.00. .00 100.00 1141-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 919.00 .00 381.36 1141-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 2,994.00 255.00 2,994.00 1141-4396 INSURANCE USER -CHARGES' 1,833.00 150.00 1,833.00 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8,533.00 981.35 8,003.89 CITY TREASURER 60,718.00 1999-00 i. • EXPEND 3,711.94 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1201 CITY MANAGER. 1201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 148,782.00 12,598.58 147,926.03 .00 855.97 99.4 1201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 10,037.00: 9,333.53 9,333.53 .00 703.47 93.0 1201-4180 RETIREMENT 10,726.00 856.00 10,028.23 .00 697.77 93.5 1201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 18,260.00 1,463.87 .17,632.33 .00 627.67 96.6 1201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,035.00 307.79 2,169.33 .00 134.33- 106.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 189,840.00 24,559.77 187,089.45 .00 2,750.55 98.6 5,103.62. 58,577.17 PAGE ENCUMB. BALANCE Y. USED .00 202:06 94..8 .00 " :1.01- 100.1 .00 7.52- 100.4 .00 .00 100.0 .00 537.64 41.5 .00 .00 100.0 .00• .00 100.0 ' .00 529.11 93.8 .00 2,140.83 96.5 1201-4200 1201-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1201-4300 ` MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ; 1201-4304 TELEPHONE 1201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES., 1201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1201-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 1201-4396 INSURANCE' USER CHARGES MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE• 1201-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 CITY MANAGER 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4100 . PERSONAL SERVICES 1202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1202.4180 RETIREMENT 1202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1202-418.9. MEDICAREBENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES 500.00 2.50 181:18 .00 318.82 1,000.00 131.36 787.52 .00 212.48 1,500.00 21.43 706.26 .00 793.74 1,400.00 20.00 1,032.00 .00 . 368.00 4,400.00 38.00 4,074.06 .00 325..94 28,590.00 2,388.00 28,590.00 .00 .00 6,657.00 552.00' 6,657.00 .00 .00 43,547.00 3,.150.79 41,846.84 .00 1,700.16 500:00 .00 216.49 .00 283.51 234,387.00 27,713.06 229,333.96 .00 5,053.04 272,667.00 21,988.06 268,738.72 .00 400.00 .00 223.68 .00 18,997.00 2,394.77 18,593.28 .00' 20,156.00 1,624.66 19,861.59 .00 28,144.00 2,253.98 v 27,160.03 .00 1,938.00 165.75 1,950.83. .00 342,302.00. 28,427.22 336,528.13 .00 36.2 78.8 47.1 73.7 92.6 100.0 100.0 96.1 43.3 97.8 3,928.28 98.6 176.32. 55.9. 403.72 97.9 294.41 98.5 983.97 96.5 12.83- 100.7 5,773.87 98.3 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 08/02/00 07:05:46 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 1202-4201 ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 67,917.00 22,799.18 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED EXPEND 62,428.84 5,292.87 195.29 99.7 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4304 TELEPHONE 2,700.00 316.42 2,004.41 .00 695.59 74.2 1202-4305 OFFICE. OPER SUPPLIES 8,325.00 576.61 8,871.59 .00 546.59- 106.6 1202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 350.00 .00 325.00 .00 25.00 92.9. 1202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,858.00 127.84 4,935.42 .00 922.58 84.3 1202-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 15,267.00 1,275.00 15,267.00 .00 .00. 100.0 1202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 5,317.00 444.00 5,317.00 .00 .00 100.0 1202-4396. INSURANCE USER CHARGES 11,316.00 943.00 11,316.00 .00 .00100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER; 49,133.00 3,682.87 48,036.42 .00 1,096.58 97.8 1202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 312.00 .00 311.76. 1202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 5,395.00 5,729.17. 5,729.17 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 5,707.00 5,729.17 6,040.93 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 465,059.00 60,638.44 453,034.32 1203 PERSONNEL 1203-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1203=4102 REGULAR SALARIES 68,057.00 5;168.50 64,969.12 _ .00 3,087.88 95.5 1203-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4,184.00 .00 .00 .00. 4,184.00 0.0 1203-4180 RETIREMENT 4,940.00 374.02 4,708.99 .00 231.01 95.3 1203-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 16,619.00 1,026.62 17,531.21 .00 912.21- 105.5 1203-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 671.00 77:82 977:24' .00 306.24- 145.6 PERSONAL SERVICES 94,471.00 6,646.96 88,186.56 .00 6,284.44 93.3 .00 .24 99.9 .00 334.17- 106.2 333.93- 105.9 6,731.81 98.6 .00 5,292.87 1203-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1203-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE ' 31,800.00 15,652.82 52,121.22 .00 20,321.22- 163.9 1203-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 0.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 33,300.00 15,652.82 52,121.22 .00 18,821.22- 156.5 1203-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1203-4304 TELEPHONE 1,260.00 200.10 1,287.35 .00 27.35- 102.2 1203-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4,100.00 177.35 4,809.27 .00 709.27- 117.3 1203-4315 MEMBERSHIP 890.00 .00 757.00 .00 133.00 85.1 1203-4317. CONFERENCE/TRAINING 12,950.00 3,985.15 8,597.04 .00 4,352.96 66.4 1203-4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 19,295.00 2,072.00 10,550.70 .00 8,744.30 54.7- 1203-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 5,388.00' 449.00 5,388.00 .00 •.00 100.0 1203-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 4,191.00 352.00 4,191.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 48,074.00 7,235.60 35,580.36 .00 12,493.64 74.0 PERSONNEL 175,845.00 29,535.38 175,888.14 .00 43.14- 100.0 GENERAL APPROPRIATION PERSONAL SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES 42,821.00 3,568.40 42,820.80 .00 .20 100.0 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 .00 20.59 .00 20.59- *** 1208 1208-4100 1208-4102 1208-4106 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 107:05:46 001 ACCOUNT # GENERAL FUND DESCRIPTION 1208-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1208-4180 RETIREMENT 1208-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1208-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES 1208-4200 1208-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1208-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER. 1208-4304 TELEPHONE 315.00. 15.53 107.58 .00 207.42 34,2 1208-4305 OFFICE OPER. SUPPLIES 33,665.00- 4,805.82- 46,667:82- '.00 7 13,002'.82 138.6 1208-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 7 3,443-00 286.00 3,443.00 .00 .00 100.0 1208-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES • 1,655.00 137.00 .1,655.00 .00 .00 :100:0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER• 28,252.00- '4,367.29- 41,462.24- .00 13,210.24 146.8 GENERAL APPROPRIATION 34,303.00 3,428.50 24,534:52 .00 9,768.48 71.5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. EXPENDITURE STATUS'REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE ADJUSTED JUNE .199.9-00' ENCUMB. BALANCE. % USED APPROP- EXPEND EXPEND .3,099.00 • .00 4,352.49 .00 1,253,.49 140.4" 3,207.00..: 267.26 3,207.12 .00 .12. 100.0 2,630.00 210.78 2,542.03 .00 87.97 96.7 621.00 51:74 687.13 .00: 66.137 110.6 52,378.00: 4,098.18 53,630.16 :00 1,252.167: 102.4 10;177.00 3;159.39- 12,366.60 .00 2,189.60- 121.5 1214 PROSPECTIVE EXPENDITURES 1214-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1214-4322 UNCLASSIFIED 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 BUDGET TRANSFERS OUT 2100 POLICE 2101 POLICE 2101-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2101-4102 REGULAR SALARIES= 2,963,543.00 222,791.26 2,825,668.99 2101-4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY ' 53,345.00 4,427.66 52,110.22 2101-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 242,040.00 20,130.13: : 251,429.45 2101-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 310,360.00 29,537.35 349,768.00 2101-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 14,000.00 263.32 7,606.88 2101-4117. SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 8,200.00 314.76 6,260.69 2101-4118 TRAINING OFFICER 9,000.00 101.54 2,832.93 2101-4180 RETIREMENT 575,265.00 45,474.28 554,973.36 2101-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 39,288.00 2,590.67 32,102.74 2101-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 237,453.00 16,252.05 214,520.36 2101-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 28,647.00 2,298.91 30,413.16 PERSONAL SERVICES 4,481,141.00 344,181.93 4,327,686.78 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 104,328.00 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 5,700.00 CONTRACT SERVICES. 110,028.00 1,298,522.00 353,935.57 1,298,522.00 .00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6,041.41 666.00 6,707.41 102,048.51 3,262.00 105;310.51 .00 137,874.01 95.3 .00 1,234.78 97.7 .00 9,389.45- 103.9 .00 . 39;408.00- 112.7 :00 6,393.12 54.3 .00 : 1,939.31 76.3 .00 6,167.07 '31.5 .00 20,291.64 96.5 7,185.26 81.7 22,932:64 . 90.3 1,766.16- 106.2 153,454.22 96.6` .00 .00 .00 .00 1,334.84 944.65 99.1 .00 2,438.00 57.2 1,334.84 3,382.65, `96.9 EXPPRIN2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 08/02/00 07:05:46 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000! 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # . DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2101-4304 TELEPHONE 46,725.00 7,076.62 48,364.61 2101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 32,385.00 4;176.94 43,235.15 2101-4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 6,300.00 1,618.99 5,789.63 2101-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 3,500.00 .00 1,817.18 2101-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,600.00 278.06 4,074.79 2101-4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE POST 10,000.00 750.94 6,651.20 2101-4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 5;750.00 139.55 1,845.73 2101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,260.00 .00 386.17 2101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 19;510.00 1,042.86 12,512.26 2101-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 222,848.00 18,567.00 222,848.00 2101-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 506,383.00 42,194.00 506,383.00 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 859,261.00 75,844.96 853,907.72 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 34,500:00 POLICE 5,484,930.00 .00 1,639.61- 103.5 .00 10,850.15- 133.5 .00 510.37 91.9 .00 1,682.82 51.9 178.59 346.62. 92.5 .00 3,348.80 66.5 .00 3,904.27 32.1 .00 873.83 30.6, .00 6,997.74 64.1 .00 .00 100.0 .00 . .00 100.0. I 178.59 5,174.69 99.4 2102 CROSSING GUARD 2102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 2200 FIRE 2201 FIRE" 2201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2201-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,290,143.00 95,924.90 1,228,934.61 .00 61,208.39 95.3 2201-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 165,000.00 25,490.37 208,802.01 .00 43,802.01- 126.5 2201-4108 FLSA OVERTIME 85,000.00 10,918.14 101,513.20 .00 16,513.20- 119.4 2201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 158,786.00 31,024.60 119,424.03 .00 39,361.97 75.2 2201=4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 41,000.00 2,932.10 38,835.20 .00 2,164.80 94.7 2201.4119` FITNESS INCENTIVE 9,200.00 00 9,350.00 .00 150.00- 101.6 2201-4180 RETIREMENT 240,269.00 18,696.37 229,686.31 .00 10,582.69 95.6 2201-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 9,420.00 869.44 11,812.87 .00 2,392.87- 125.4' 2201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 158,576.00 10,792.15 130,837.57 .00 27,738.43 82.5 2201-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 15,144.00 1,300.53. 16,419.14 .00 1,275.14- 108.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,172,538.00 197,948.60 2,095,614.94 .00 76,923.06 96.5 2201-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2201-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 35,626.00 2,858.02 35,938.45 1,250.00 937.55 97.4 2201-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2,460.00 .00 2,450.00 .00 10.00 99.6 CONTRACT SERVICES 38,086.00 2,858.02. 38,388.45 1,250.00- 947.55 97.5. 6,695.88 51,551.66 34,500.00 0.0 196,511.56 96.4 3,821.34 93.1 2201-4300 2201-4304 2201-4305 2201-4309 2201-4315 2201-4317 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER TELEPHONE - OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE. MATERIALS MEMBERSHIP CONFERENCE/TRAINING 7,900.00 1,282.96. 8,873.14 .00 973.14- 112.3 4,836.00 470.49 5,279.70 .00 443.70- 109.2 18,000.00 1,219.37 16,397.60 .00 1,602,40 91.1 2,350.00 25.00 1;559.84 .00 790.16 66.4 14,900.00 806.09 9,452`.26 .00 5,447.74 63.4 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 ACCOUNT # 2201-4390 2201-4395 2201-4396 2201-5400 2201-5401 2201-5402 3100 3104 . 3104-4100 3104-4102 3104-4106 3104-4111 3104-4112 3104-4180 3104-4188 3104-4189 3104-4200 3104-4201 3104-4251 3104-4300 3104-4303. 3104-4309 3104-4395 3104-4396 3104-5400 3104-5401 3104-5402_ 4100 4101, 4101-4100 4101-4102 4101-4111 4101-4112 GENERAL FUND DESCRIPTION COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES INSURANCE USER CHARGES MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER • EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE . EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000. EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE FIRE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE 'STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED APPROP 5,389.00 73,868.00 163,780.00 291,023.00 1,045.00 6,000.00 • 7,045.00 2,508,692.00 JUNE EXPEND . 450.00 6,152.00 13,652.00 24,057.91 1999-00 EXPEND 5,389.00 73,868.00 163,780.00 284,599.54 ENCUMB. .00 .00 .00 .00 PAGE BALANCE % USED . .00 .00 .00 6,423.46 880.88 .00 880.88 2,419,483.81 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS STREET MAINT/TRAFFIC SAFETY PERSONAL SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES REGULAR OVERTIME .ACCRUAL CASH IN PART TIME/TEMPORARY. RETIREMENT • EMPLOYEE BENEFITS MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE . CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT CONTRACT SERVICES MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER UTILITIES MAINTENANCE MATERIALS EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES INSURANCE'USER CHARGES. MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EQUIP-LESS,THAN $1,000 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE STREET MAINT/TRAFFIC SAFETY, PLANNING PLANNING PERSONAL SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES ACCRUAL CASH IN PART TIME/TEMPORARY 126,008.00 1,500.00 3,557.00. 21,000.00 9,948.00 17,449.00 1,433.00 180,895.00 236,700.00 560.00 237,260.00, 8,700.00 60,000.00 15,231.00 102,883.00 186,814.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 12,000.00 616,969.00 200,805.00 4;021.00 8,432.00 9,187.18 326.23 .00 369.00 686.58 943.87 53.85 11,566.71 112,412.64... 3,243.26 3,789.63 16,830.50 8,401.22 15,513.43 1,400.06 161,590.74 17,230.00 ' 169,361.66 .00 358.20 17,230.00 169,719.86 638.45 8,419.50 1,272.00 8,569.00 18,898.95 .00' .00 .00. 1,250.00- .00 .00 .00 ..00 .00 .00 .00 .00 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.8 164.12 84.3 6,000.00 0.0 6,164.12 12.5 90,458.19 96.4 13,595.36 89.2 1,743.26- 216.2 232.63-.106.5 4,169.50 80.1 1,546.78 1,935.57 32.94 19,304.26 84.5 88.9 97.7 89.3 59,933.34 74.7 201.80 64.0 60,135.14 . 74.7 . 7,330.68 53,270.79 15,231.00 102,883.00, 178,715.47 4,455.57. 5,618.17. 5,095.44 5,095.44 9,551.01 10,713.61 57,246.67 520,739.68 17,410.91' .00 171.50 202,536.96 7,745.69' 6,848.78. .00 989.70 .00 .00 989.70 .00 .00 .00 8,394.70 .00 .00 .00 1,369.32 84.3 5,739.51 90.4 .00 100.0 .00 100.0 7,1.08.83 96.2 381.83 93.6 904.56 84.9 1,286.39 :.89.3 87,834.62 85.8 1,731.96- 100.9 3,724.69- 192.6;. 1,583.22 81.2 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 001 GENERAL FUND - CITY OF.HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE'2000 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APPROP 4101-4180. 4101-4188 4101-4189 410'1-4200 4101-4201 RETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE JUNE EXPEND 1999-00 EXPEND 18,529.00 1,500.76 17,625.96 27,225.00 1,989.13 22,585.36 2,668.00 239.13. 2,834.74 261,680.00 21,311.43 260,177.49 68,436.00 1,410.00 36,422.03 ENCUMB. PAGE 8 BALANCE % USED. .00 903.04 95.1 .00 4,639.64 83.0 .00 166.74-.106.2 .00 1,502.51 99.4 .00 32,013.97 53.2 4101-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER. 4101-4304 TELEPHONE 2,415.00 139.69 903.93 .00 1,511.07 37.4 4101-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 8,665.00 427.50 7,242.02 .00 1,422.98 83.6 4101-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,000.00 .00 1,124.00 .00 124.00- 112.4 4101-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 2,960.00 126.00 1,421.90 .00 1,538.10 48.0 4101-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 7,634.00 : 638.00 7,634.00 .00 .00 100.0 4101-4396 ` INSURANCE USER CHARGES 8,916.00 743.00 8,916.00 .00 .00 100;0' MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 31,590.00: 2,074.19. 27,241.85 .00 4,348.15 86.2 4101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4101-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 985.00 649.48 983-96 PLANNING • 362,691.00 25,445.10 324,825.33 4200 CONST/ENG/ENF 4201 BUILDING 4201-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 420174102 REGULAR SALARIES "4201-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4201-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4201-4180 RETIREMENT 4201-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4201-4189. MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES .00 1.04 99.9 .00 37,865.67 89.6 4201-4200 ._ 4201-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 192,092.00 3,964.00 8,432.00 14,230.00 29,526.00 2,807.00 251,051.00 19,554.71 15,758.84 .00 171.50 1,188.70 2,187.89 247.78 192,404.15 .00 312.15. 100.2 8,419.23 .00 4,455.23- 212.4 6,848.72 .00 1,583.28 81.2 14,437.56 .00 207.56- 101.5 26,175.59 .00 3,350.41 88.7 3,159.19 .00 352.19- 112.5 251,444.44 .00 393.44- 100.2 247,040.00 7,646.86 ' 136,628.86 4,905.66 105,505.48 57.3 4201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4201-4304 TELEPHONE 4,410.00 323.98 2,331.37 .00 2,078.63 52.9 4201-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5,850.00 286.90 5,547.45 .00 302.55 94.8 4201-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,480.00 125.00 947-42 .00 532.58 64.0 4201-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 3,500.00 70.00 1,945.69 .00 1,554.31 55.6 4201-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 12,873.00 1,070.00 12,873.00 .00 .00 100.0 4201-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 9,512.00 789.00 9,512.00. .00 .00 100.0 4201-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 9,881.00 828.00 9,881.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 47,506.00 3,492.88 43,037.93 .00 4,468.07 90.6 BUILDING 545,597.00 30,694.45 431,111.23 4,905.66 109,580.11 79.9 4202 4202-4100 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS PERSONAL. SERVICES EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 001 ACCOUNT .# GENERAL FUND DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED 'APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4202-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 199,699.00 16,778.08 182,635.71 .00 17,063:29 91.5' 4202-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,500.00 59.85 754.16 .00 745.84 50.3 4202-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,141.00" .00 2,065.90 .00 4,075.10 33-6 4202-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4,968.00 .00 4,967.27 .00 .73 100.0 4202-4180 RETIREMENT 15,630.00 1,228.60 13,553.70 :00 2,076.30 86.7. 4202-4187 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 5,600.00 787.53 5,243.67 .00 356.33, 93.6 4202-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 26,164.00. 1,761.21 19,346.40 .00 6,817.60 73.9 4202-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,615.00 149.69 1,735:34 .00 879.66 66.4 PERSONAL SERVICES. 262,317.00. 20,764.96 230,302.15 .00 32,014.85 87.8 4202-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4202-4201. CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 174,615.00" 11;184.06' 157,537.57 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4303 UTILITIES 74,700.00 3,117:96 75,162.91 .00 462.91- 100.6 4202-4304 TELEPHONE 9;500.00 1,731.49 12,033.25 .00 2,533.25 126.7 4202-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 11,500.00 1,258.80 8,272.94 .00 3,227.06 71.9 4202-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 20,000.00 4,253.19 ' 30,345.23 .00 10,345.23- 151.7 4202-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,010.00 .00 470.00 .00 540.00 46.5 4202-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 10,900.00 130.85 6,112.37 .00 4,787.63 56.1 4202-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 16,465.00. 1,373.00 16,465.00 .00 .00 100.0 4202-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 25,137.00 2,092.00 25,137.00 .00 .00 100.0 4202-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 29,929.00 2,495.00 29,929.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 199,141.00 16,452.29 203,927.70 .00 4,786.70- 102.4 17,077.43 90.2, 4202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 3,300.00 .00 1,196.33 4202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 25,000.00 .00 .00 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 28,300.00 .00 1,196.33 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS 664,373.00 48,401.31 592,963.75 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 88,479.00 6,795.06 81,415.74 4204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 2,000.00 347.45 3,177,80 4204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 962.00 .00 539.18 4204-4180 RETIREMENT 6,667.00 513.00. 6,156.01 4204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 12,223.00 797.48 9,631.66 4204.4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS ' 550.00 41.00 498.13 PERSONAL SERVICES 110,881.00 8,493.99 101,418.52 2;103.67 36.3, 25,000.00 0.0 27,103.67 4.2 71,409.25 89.3, 4204-4200 4204-4201 4204-4300 4204-4303 4204-4309 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT* SERV/PRIVATE' MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER UTILITIES 104,200.00 6,438.75 101,989.20 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 36,265.00 6,117.48 44,699.94 ` 7,063.26 92.0.: 1,177.80- 158.9 422.82 56.0 510.99 92.3 2,591.34 78.8 51.87 90.6 9,462.48 91.5. 90,580.00 16,360.00 97,546.08 6,966.08- 107.7 2,210.80 97.9 8,434.94- 123.3. EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 001 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE -1999-00 APPROP EXPEND' EXPEND 4204-4321 BUILDING SFTY/SECURITY 10,310.00 7,822.91 - 10,896.91. 4204-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 8,831.00 735.00 8,831.00 4204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 30,962.00 2,582.00 30,962.00 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 190,568.00 23,696.14 197,379.05 4204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4204-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,550.00 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 393,579.00 48,550.13 397;841.57 .00 1,497.92.- 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 229,943.00 18,515.44_ 213,348.20 .00 16,594:80 92.8 4601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4,000.00 800.00- 744.21 .00 3,255.79 18.6 4601-4111. ACCRUAL CASH IN 14,167.00 .00 3,045.56 .00 11,121.44 21.5 4601=4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 141,575.00 11,617.77 137,391.15 :00 4,183.85 97.0. 4601-4180 RETIREMENT 17,492.00 1,424.58 16,358.24 .00 1.,133.76 93.5. 4601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 28,175.00 2,073.99 23,387.34 .00 4,787.66 83.0 4601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 6,649.00 699.50 6,931.05 .00 282.05- 104.2 PERSONAL SERVICES 442,001.00 33,531.28 401,205.75 .00 40,795.25 90.8 ENCUMB. PAGE 10 BALANCE % USED .00 586.91- 105.7 .00 .00 100.0 .00 .00 100.0 .00 6,811.05-.103.6 .00 52.08 96.6 .00 4,262.57- 101.1 4601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4601-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 60,306.00 1,433.75 57,882.09 .00 2,423.91 96.0 4601-4221 CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR 175,108.00 16,793.47 159,924.44 .00 15,183.56 91.3 CONTRACT SERVICES 235,414.00 18,227.22; 217,806.53 .00 17,607.47 .92.5 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4302 ADVERTISING 20,000.00 .00 20,886.18 .00 886.18- 104.4 4601-4304 TELEPHONE 6,727.00 1,166.82 7,249.12 .00 522.12- 107.8 4601-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 8,000.00 891.11 6,435.18 .00 1,564.82 80.4 4601-4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 25,680.00 5,920.66 24,440.68 270.63 968.69 96.2 4601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1,303.00 .00 1,036.36 .00 266.64 79.5 4601-4315 MEMBERSHIP 1,100.00 385.00 1,011.53 .00 88.47 92.0 4601-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 5,500.00 700.12 5,779.10 .00 279.10- 105.1 4601-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 16,914.00 1,404.00 16,914.00 .00 .00 100.0 4601-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 8,587.00 711.00 8,587.00 .00 .00 100.0 4601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 16,934.00 1,413.00 16,934.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 110,745.00 12,591.71 109,273.15 270.63 1,201.22 98.9 4601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4601-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 4,443.00 2,255.92 4,796.48 .00 353.48- 108.0 4601-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 10,374:00 .00 5,781.80 .00 4,592.20 55.7 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 14,817.00 2,255.92 10,578.28 .00 4,238.72 '71.4 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 802,977.00 66,606.13 738,863.71 270.63 63,842.66 92.0 8100 8160 8160-4200 STREET SAFETY DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 ''07:05:46 001 GENERAL FUND DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE '8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8621 PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 8621-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES. 8621-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT'- JUNE 2000' PAGE 11 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 57,641.00 220;000.00 .00 5,299.81 .00 52,341.19 9.2 .00 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8622-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8622-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8622-4180 RETIREMENT 8622-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8622-4189 FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 8630 8630-4200 8630-4201 PIER RENOVATION/PHASE III. CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE EXPENDITURE CONTROL GENERAL FUND 9,600.00 750.00 480.00 300.00. 11,130.00 323,858.00 334,988.00 .00 215,663.66. 4,336.34 98.0 .00 4,787.10. .00 358.57 .00 403.66 .00 69.40 .00 5,618.73 .00 .00' 5,618.73 .00 .00 4,812.90 49.9 .00 391.43 47.8 .00 76.34 84.1 .00 230.60 23.1 .00 5,511.27 50.5 .00 323,858.00 0.0 .00 329,369.27 1.7_` 780,000.00 5,625.00 :9,297.50 182,652.50 588,050.00 24.6 15,808,791.00 1,489,469.12 13,584,162.11 418,701.86 1,805,927.03 88.6 15,808,791.00 1,489,469.12 .13,584,162.11 418,701.86 ~1,805,927.03 88.6 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 18,322.00 1,526.98 18,322.00 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 2601 • LTNG/LANDSCAPING (MEDIANS) 2601-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2601-4102 REGULAR SALARIES. 183,215.00 15,715.47 187,348.26. .00 4,133.26- 102.3. 2601-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1,900.00 150.65 2,091.08 .00 191.08- 110.1 2601-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 7,025.00 .00 513.00 .00 6,512.00 7.3 2601-4180 RETIREMENT 13,660.00 1,178.49 14,040.03 .00 380..03- 102.8 2601-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 17,706.00 1,756.45 21,079.09 .00 3,373.09- 119.1, 2601-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 1,829.00 .155.32 1,912.21 .00 83.21- 104.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 225,335.00 18,956.38 226,983.67 .00 1,648.67- 100.7 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED APPROP BALANCE % USED .00 -100.0 2601-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2601-4201 CONTRACT•SERV/PRIVATE 2601-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT CONTRACT SERVICES 18,800.00 11,558.49 22,493.22 .00 3,693.22- 119.6 20,500.00 2,569:32 18,929.12 .00 1,570.88 92.3 39,300.00 14,127.81 41,422.34 .00 2,122.34- 105.4 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4303 UTILITIES 118,200.00 8,929.58 121,860.12 .00 3,660.12- 103.1 2601-4304 TELEPHONE 300.00 .00' 256.07 .00 43.93 85.4 2601-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 21,100.00 4;085.38 25,193.23 .00 4,093.23- 119.4 2601=4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 21,730.00 1,809.00 21,730.00 .00 .00 100.0 2601-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 28,373.00 2,369.00 28,373.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 189,703.00 17,192.96 197,412.42 ` .00 7,709.42- 104.1 2601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2601-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500. 8,000.00 '.00 .00 .00 8,000.00 0.0 LTNG/LANDSCAPING (MEDIANS) 462,338.00 50,277.15 465,818.43 .00 3,480.43- 100.8 8100 STREET SAFETY 8153 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 14TH 8153-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8153-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 108,995.00 17,638.70 82,620.30 4,173.20 22,201.50 79.6 8156 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 13TH. 8156-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8156-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 108,951.00 15,025.56 72,249.76 20,791.19 15,910.05 85.4 8160 . 8160-4200 8160-4201 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8621 PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 8621-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES " 49,600.00 .00 49,600.00 .00 .00 100.0 EXPPR.IN2 08/02/00 105 ACCOUNT # 07:05:46 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND DESCRIPTION 8621-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8621-4180 RETIREMENT 8621-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8621-4189 FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 8621-4200 8621-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES EXPENDITURE CONTROL LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED - JUNE APPROP EXPEND, 2,707.00 .00 203.00 .00 254.00 .00 39.00. .00 3,203.00 .00 96,797.00 100,000.00 •848,206.00 1999-00 EXPEND 2,664.19 202.54 204.95 39.19 3,110.87 ENCUMB. PAGE 13, BALANCE % USED 42.81 98.4 .46 99.8 49.05 80.7 .19--100.5 92.13 97.1 2,119.00 2,119.00 84,852.78 2,119.00 5,229.87 84,852.78 86,587.39 693,840.36 109,817.17 848,206.00 86,587.39 9,825.22 89.8 9,917.35 ' 90.1 44,548.47 94.7 693,840.36 109,817.17 44,548.47 94'.7 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 1200 1299 1299-4300 1299-4399 3300 3301 3301-4100 3301-4102 3301-4111 3301-4180 3301-4188 3301-4189 3301-4200 3301-4201 3301-4300 3301-4304 3301-4319 3301-4396 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT BUDGET TRANSFER OUT MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP 'EXPEND • 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED EXPEND PARKING FACILITIES DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT PERSONAL SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES ACCRUAL CASH IN RETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES 9,089.00 185.38 9,089.00 .00 .00 100.0 22,249.00 1,731.90 22,155.85 92.00. .00 .00 1,635.00 127.08 1,627.84 2,222.00 189.25 2,142.54 340.00 25.96 331.52 26,538.00 2,074.19. 26,257.75 .00 93.15. 99.6 .00 92.00 0.0 .00 7.16 99.6 .00 79.46 96.4 .00 8.48 97.5 .00 280.25 98.9 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER TELEPHONE SPECIAL EVENTS INSURANCE USER CHARGES. MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 109,596.00, 34,603.01 120,191.61( .00 10,595.61- 109.7 3301-4900 DEPRECIATION 3301-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 245.00 .00 .00 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 159,322.00 36,117.70 161,015.52 100.00 .00 .00 21,836.00 642.50- 13,559.16 1,007.00 83.00 1,007.00:. 22,943.00 559.50- 14,566.16 .00 100.00 0.0 .00 8,276.84 62.1 .00 .00 100.0 .00 8,376.84 63.5 3304- 3304-4200 3304-4201 3304-4300 3304-4303 3304-4304. NORTH -PIER PARKING STRUCTURE CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE .00 .00 245.00 0.0 1,693.52- 101.1 59,435.00 19,102.53 51,466.18. 7,968.82 .00 100.0` MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER UTILITIES 800.00 .00 508.24 .00 291.76 63.5 TELEPHONE 700.00 . 51.94 1,047.87 .00 347.87- 149.7 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,500.00 51.94 1,556.11 .00 56.11- 103.7 3304-5400 3304-5401 3305 3305-4200 3305-4201 3306 3306-4200 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 1,000.00 .00 733.51 .00 266.49 73.4 NORTH PIER PARKING STRUCTURE 61,935.00 19,154.47 53,755.80 7,968.82 210.38 99.7 DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT A CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 45,308.00 19,532.22 37,726.64 7,581.36 .00 100.0 CO. SHARE PKG STRUCTURE REV. CONTRACT SERVICES EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # 3306-4251 8100 8158 8158-4200 8158-4201 8160 8160-4200, 8160-4201 8600 .8624 8624-4200 8624-4201 DESCRIPTION CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T STREET SAFETY .. DEVELOPERS REIMB/14TH ST, ETC. CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE DWNTWN:IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE -CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE 15 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00- 'ENCUMB. BALANCE / USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 100,093.00 .00 .00 .00 100,093.00 0.0 165,000.00 119,617.00 .00 24,000.00 .00 141,000.00 14.5 .00 8,900.00 :00' 110,717.00: 7.4 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C CONTRACT SERVICES.. CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 348,150.0,0 34,132.60' 346,739.31 500.00 910.69 99.7. EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,008,514.00 109,122.37 641,226.27 16,050.18 351,237.55 65.2 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 1,008,514.00 _ 109,122.37 - 641,226.27. 16,050.18 351,237.55. 65.2 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00. 07:05:46 110 . PARKING FUND ACCOUNT # CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE.STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 DESCRIPTION 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1204 FINANCE CASHIER 1204-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1204-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 192,444.00 15,861.62 188,892.05 1204-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 .00 .00 1204-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 6,143.00 389.58 2,246.57 1204-4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .00 .00 .00 1204-4180 RETIREMENT 14,406.00 1,186.73 14,139.15 1204-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 19,478.00 1,634.84 19,369.80 1204-4189 MEDICARE' BENEFITS 1,757.00 148.37 1,744.42 PERSONAL SERVICES 234,728.00 19,221.14 226,391.99 ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND 1999-00 EXPEND ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED 1204-4200 1204-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT-SERV/PRIVATE 15,267.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3,551.95 98.2 500.00 0.0 3,896.43 36.6.. .00 *** 266.85 98.1 108.20 99.4 12.58 99.3 8,336.01 96.4 1204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1204-4304 TELEPHONE 2,518.00. 221.84 1;546.21 .00 971.79 61.4 1204-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 24,301.00' 733.78 19,055.45 .00 5,245.55 78.4 1204-4315 MEMBERSHIP 125.00 .00 125.00 .00 .00 100.0 1204-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 1,328.00. .00 435.48 .00 892.52 32.8 1204-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 19,384.00 1,619.00 19,384.00 .00 .00 100.0 1204-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 6,988.00 586.00 6,988.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 54,644.00 3,160.62 47,534.14 .00 7,109.86 87.0 547.29 10,425.99.,4,000.-00 841.01 94.5 1204-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1204-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 2,500.00 FINANCE CASHIER. 307,139.00 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 3300 3302 3302-4100 3302-4102 3302-4106 3302-4111 3302-4112 3302-4117 3302-4180 3302-4187 3302-4188 3302-4189 PARKING FACILITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES PERSONAL SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES REGULAR OVERTIME ACCRUAL CASH IN PART TIME/TEMPORARY SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL_ RETIREMENT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES 3302-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES .00 2,500.00 0.0 4,000.00 18,786.88 93.9 651,599.00 54,299.88 651,599.00 .00 .00 100.0 506,540.00 42,989.56 501,698.99. 8,000.00 1,172.94 3,987.57 29,326.00 1,125.15 13,492.06 10,600.00 1,815.36 9,336.42 3,800.00 345.53. 3,392.86 51,826.00 4,423.60 51,475.07 4,050.00 295.48 3,976.39 49,338.00 4,168.09 48,239.75 6,296.00. 420.99'. 3,522.23 669,776.00 56,756.70 639,121.34 .00 4,841.01 99.0 .00 4,012.43 49.8 .00 15,833.94 46.0 .00 1,263.58 88.1 .00 407.14 89.3 .00 350.93. 99.3 .00 73.61 98.2 .00 1,098.25 97.8 .00 2,773.77 55.9 .00 30,654.66 95.4 08/02/00 07:05:46 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3302-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 3302-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'T CONTRACT SERVICES 'CITY 'OF HERMOSA BEACH - EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED APPROP 9,138.00 1,500.00 10,638.00 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3302-4304 TELEPHONE 3,000.00 3302-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9,500.00 3302-4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 1,600.00 3302-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12,138.00 3302-4315 MEMBERSHIP 300.00. 3302-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 6,800.00 3302-4390 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT CHRGS 3,143.00. 3302-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 88,123.00 3302-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 58,930.00 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 183,534.00 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIP 400.00 .00 .00 .00 400.00 0.0. 3302-4903 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS 900.00 .00 .00. .00 900.00 0.0 3302-4904 DEPRECIATION/IMPROVMNTS 5.00 .00 .00 .00 5.00 0.0 DEPRECIATION 1,305.00 .00 .00 .00 1,305.00 0:0 PAGE 17 JUNE 1999-00 `. ENCUMB.` BALANCE % USED EXPEND EXPEND 676.06 5,989.71 .00 3,148.29 65.5 927.72 1,503.95 .00 3.95- 100.3 1,603.78 7,493.66. .00 3,144.34 70.4 483.28 3,286.18 .00 286.18- 109.5 1,148.17 8,022.23 - .00 1,477.77 ;84:4 .00 .00 .00 1,600.00 0.0 4,597.02. 14,387.81 .00 2,249.81-.118.5 .00 .00 .00 300.00 0.0 518.17. 5,331.15 .00 .1,468.85 78.4 261.00 3,143.00 .00 .00 100.0 7,339.00 88,123.00 .00 .00 100.0 4,909.00 58,930.00 .00 .00 100.0' 19,255.64 181,223.37 .00 2,310.63 98.7 '3302-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3302-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 3302-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 3302-5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS :.EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE COMMUNITY SERVICES EXPENDITURE, CONTROL PARKING FUND 837.00 .00 .00 .00 837.00 0.0 4,521.00 2,014.23 5,024.95 .00 503.95- 111.1 7,575.00 .00 7,575.34 .00 .34-100.0 12,933.00 2,014.23, 12,600.29 .00 332.71 97.4. 878,186.00 79,630.35. 840,438.66 .00 .37,747.34 95.7 1,836,924.00 156,859.28 1,776,389.78 4,000.00 56,534.22 96.9 1,836,924.00 156,859.28 1,776,389.78 4,000.00 56,534.22 96.9 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 1200 1299 1299-4300 1299-4399 DESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT BUDGET TRANSFER OUT MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 8100 STREET SAFETY 8144 HERMOSA BEACH BIKE PATH 8144-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8144-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8144-4180 RETIREMENT 8144-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS' 8144-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES 8144-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8144-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE HERMOSA BEACH,BIKE PATH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. APPROP EXPEND EXPEND BALANCE % USED 340,988.00 28,415.63 340,988.00 8153. 8153-4200 8153=4201 • .00 .00 100.0 1,206.00 90.00 113.00 18.00 1,427.00 15,919.00 17,346.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 14TH CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,304.00 8156 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/HERMOSA & 13TH 8156-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8156-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,304:00 .00 5,304.00 368,942.00 33,580.63 357,556.53 357,556.53 .00 678.71 .00_ 55.51 .00 50.56 .00 10.75 .00 795.53 527.29 34.49 62.44 7.25 631.47 56.3 61.7 .: 44.7 59.7 55.7 5,165.00 5,165.00 7,030.00 3,724.00 76.6 5,165.00; 5,960.53 7,030.00,. 4,355.47 74.9 0 , 5,304.00 .00 EXPENDITURE CONTROL .00 7,030.00 .00 100.0 .00 100.0 4,355.47 98.8 4,355.47 98.8. EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 117 AB939 FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 5300 AB939 5301 SRCE.REDCTN/RECYCLE • 5301-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 5301-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 5301-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 5301-4180 RETIREMENT 5301-4188.' EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5301-4189 FICA PERSONAL. SERVICES 5301-4200 5301-4201 5301-4300 5301-4305 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE ELEMENT MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES= 1,500.00 .00 SRCE REDCTN/RECYCLE ELEMENT 55,938.00 2,336.81 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE 19 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 19,759.00 1,338.76 16,178.27 .00 3,580.73. 81.9 922.00 702.52 1,376.05 .00 454.05- 149.2 1,436.00 98.30 1,182,24 .00 253.76 82.3 2,076.00 167.12 1,999.82 .00 76.18 96.3 245.00 30.11 260.32 .00 15.32- 106.3 24,438.00 2,336.81 20,996.70 .00 3,441.30 85.9 • 30,000.00 .00 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 55,938.00 .00 .00 20,996.70 .00 30,000.00 0.0 .00 1,500.00 0.0 .00 34,941.30 37.5 20,996.70 ..00 34,941.30 AB939 FUND 55,938.00 2,336.81 ( 20,996.70 .00 34,941.30 37.5 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 8100 STREET SAFETY 8141 STREET REHAB 8141-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8141-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8141-4180 RETIREMENT 8141-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8141-4189 FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 8141-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE STREET -REHAB CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND BALANCE % USED EXPEND 502.00 .00 .00 .00 502.00 0.0 38.00 .00 .00 .00 38.00 0.0 47.00 .00 .00 .00 47.00 0.0 7.00 .00 .00 .00 7.00 0.0 594.00 .00 .00 .00 594.00 0.0 78,507.00 79,101.00 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 79,101.00 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND .00 70,581.76' .00 70,581.76 .00 70,581.76 .00 7,925.24 89.9 .00 8,519.24 89.2 .00 8,519.24 89.2 79,101.00 00 70,581.76 .00 8,519.24 89.2 EXPPRIN2. 08/02/00 07:05:46 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE. FUND . ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT, 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 8100 STREET .SAFETY , 8144 • HERMOSA BEACH BIKE. PATH 8144-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8144-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8144-4180. RETIREMENT 8144-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8144-4189 FICA PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE HERMOSA BEACH BIKE PATH 8144-4200 8144-4201 8300 STORM DRAIN 8305 INSTALL CDS CLARIFIER UNITS 830574200 CONTRACT SERVICES 830574201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8306 INSTALL CATCH BASIN INSERTS 8306-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8306-4201 _CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8600 •BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8621-- PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 8621-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES, 8621-4102 REGULAR. SALARIES 8621-4180 RETIREMENT 8621-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8621-4189 FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 8621-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8621-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE ' 1,050,524.00 99,496.37 430,885.60 616,102.67 3,535.73 99,7 PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 1,071,949.00 102,168.71 435,760.87 .616,102.67 20,085.46 ,98.1 8624 DWNTWN PKG STRUCTURE/LOT C 8624-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 862474201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 942,939.00 120,138.84 796,029.90 51,012.25 95,896.85 89.8,. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - EXPENDITURE 'STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE 21 'ADJUSTED:. JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 19,097.00 1,591.38 19,097.00 .00 .00 100.0 7,823.00 222.87 6,699.50 .00 1,123.50 85.6 586.00 16.69 508.69. .00 77.31 86.8 734.00 30.23 504.11, .00 229.89 68.7 113.00 3.23 98.47 .00 14.53 87.1 9,256.00 273.02 7,810.77 .00 1,445.23 84.4 380,158.00 7,548.10 27,875.85 8,254.95 344,027.20 9.5 389,414.00 7,821.12 35,686.62 8,254.95 345,472.43 11.3 367,761.00 .00 .00 .00 56,250.00 .00 .00 _00: 18,108.00 2,303.05 4,176.09 .00 1,356.00 182.77 347.69 .00`` 1,698.00 151.13 284.17 .00 263.00 35.39 67.32 .00 21,425.00 2,672.34 4,875.27 .00 13,931.91 1,008.31 1,413.83 195.68 16,549.73 2,847,410.00 231,720.05 1,286,574.39 675,369.87 885,465.74 68.9 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 2,847,410.00 231,720.05 1,286,574.39 675,369.87 885,465.74 68.9 EXPPR1N2 08/02/00 07:05:46 PARK/REC FACILITY TAX FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND 8500 PARKS 8529 CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 8529-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8529-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 119,660.00 4,860.00 4,860.00 540.00 114,260.00. 4.5 1999-00 EXPEND ENCUMB. BALANCE %USED 8530 VARIOUS PARK IMPROVEMENTS 8530-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8530-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8530-4180 RETIREMENT 8530-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8530-4189 FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 5,413.00 405.00 508.00 79.00 6,405.00 .00 1,676.83 .00 3,736.17 31.0 .00 131.05 .00 273.95 32.4 .00 148.20 .00 359.80 29.2 .00 25.37 .00 53.63 32.1 .00 1,981.45 .00 4,423.55 30.9` 8530-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ;. 8530-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 263,859.00 4,359.00 VARIOUS PARK IMPROVEMENTS 270,264.00 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8627 COMMUNITY CTR IMPROVEMENTS 8627-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8627-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 5,379.00 583.92 3,113.62 .00 2,265.38 57.9 8627-4180 .; RETIREMENT 403.00 45.28 . 251.08 .00 151.92 62.3 8627-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 505.00 106.16 242.89 .00 262.11 48.1 8627-4189 FICA 78.00 8.77 49.53 .00 28.47 63.5 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,365.00 744.13 3,657.12 .00 2,707.88 57.5 4,359.00 ' 13,09'6.84 15,078.29 .00 250,762.16 5.0. .00 255,185.71 5.6 8627-4200. CONTRACT SERVICES 8627-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8627-5600 8627-5602 246,899.00 1,712.00. 8,550.92 .00 238,348.08 3.5 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS IMPRVMNTS OTHER THAN BLDGS 17,000.00 .00 16,945.00 .00 COMMUNITY CTR IMPROVEMENTS 270,264.00 2,456.13 29,153.04 .00 EXPENDITURE CONTROL PARK/4C FACILITY TAX FUND 55.00 99.7 241,110.96 10.8 660,188.00 11,675.13 49,091.33 _ 540.00 610,556.67 660,188.00 11,675.13 49,091.33 540.00 610,556.67 7.5 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 8500 PARKS 8507 VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS 8507-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8507-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8507-4180 RETIREMENT 8507-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8507-4189 FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 8507-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8507-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE VALLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE 23 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE / USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 4,188.00 314.00 393.00 60.00 4,955.00 943.25. 75.31. 106.18 14.58, 1,139.32 2,913.48 236.30, 206.88 3,402.40 1,274.52 69.6 .00 77.70 75.3 .00 186.12 52.6 .00 14.26 76.2 .00 1,552.60 68.7 354,939.00 11,979.36 13,910.17 64,108.83 276,920.00 "22.0 359,894.00 13,118.68 17,312.57- 64,108:83 278,472.60 .22.6 8526 COMMUNITY: CTR TENNIS CENTER 8526-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8526-4201 CONTRACT; SERV/PRIVATE 8529 CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 8529-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8529-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 5,287.00 8529-4180 RETIREMENT 396.00 8529-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 496.00 8529-4189 FICA 76.00 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,255.00 .00 187,660.00 2,572.75 765.25 99.6 8529-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8529-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 5,022.03 5:0. 376:15 5.0 496.00 0.0 72.16 5.1 5,966.34 4.6 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 31,085.00 4,115.00 ' 4,115.00 12,450.00 14,520.00 53.3. 37,340.00 4,115.00 4,403.66 12,450.00 20,486.34 45.1 588,232.00 17,233.68 209,376.23 79,131.58 299,724.19 49.0_ 17,233.68 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 127 ACCOUNT # BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND DESCRIPTION 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL. 8622-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8622-4201 CONTRACT. SERV/PRIVATE • EXPENDITURE CONTROL BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE 24 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE; % USED EXPEND APPROP EXPEND 134,821.00 134,821.00 134,821.00 .00 745.00 .00 134,076.00 0.6 .00 745.00 .00 134,076.00 .0.6 134,076.00 0.6 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 .137 MYRTLE; DIST ADMIN EXP FUND ACCOUNT # 1200 1299 1299-4300 1299-4399 8100 8182 8182-4200 8182-4201 DESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT BUDGET TRANSFER OUT MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER OPERATING TRSFR OUT STREET SAFETY -UTIL UNDRGRND/MYRTLE AVE CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT'SERV/PRIVATE EXPENDITURE CONTROL MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE 25 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED 'APPROP EXPEND EXPEND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *** 4,378.00 4,378.00 4,378.00 14.00 91.00 .00 4,287.00 2.1 14.00 91.00. .00 4,287:00 2.1 14.00 91.00 .00 4,287.00 2.1 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 138 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND CITY. OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT. 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 8100 8183 8183-4200 8183-4201 STREET SAFETY UTIL UNDRGRND/LOMA DR CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT-SERV/PRIVATE EXPENDITURE CONTROL LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND .00 5,533.00 5,533.00 5,533.00 1999-00 EXPEND ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED 14.00 5,507.00 0.5 14.00 26:00 .00 5,507.00 0.5 5,507.00 0.5 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00. 07:05:46 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8622 .,ADA.COMPLIANCE, CITY 8622-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8622-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8622-4180 RETIREMENT 8622-4188' EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8622-4189 FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 8622-4200 8622-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE HALL. 8622-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 8622-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 100.00 .00 ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL 155,397.00 CITY. OF,HERMOSA;BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS. REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE APPROP EXPEND .EXPEND PAGE 27 USED 5,100.00 405.77 1,199.21 .00 3,900.79 - 23.5 382.00 35.84 105.42 .00 276.58. 27.6 465.00 51.68 104.05 .00 360.95 22.4 29.00 .00 ` .00 .00 29.00 0.0 5,976.00 493.29 1,408.68 .00 4,567.32 23.6 149,321.00 149,321.00 0.0 8623 99-00 ALLOCATION 8623-4200.CONTRACT SERVICES 8623-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE EXPENDITURE CONTROL COMMUNITY'DEV BLOCK GRANT. 141,459.00 493.29 39.68 1,448.36 .00 .00 296,856.00 493.29 1,448.36 296,856.00 493.29 1,448.36. .00 60.32 39.7 .00 153,948.64 0.9 .00 141,459.00 0.0 .00 295,407.64 0.5 .00 295,407.64 -. 0.5 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 3400 PUBLIC TRANSIT 3401 DIAL A RIDE 3401.4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3401-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 3401-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3401-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 3401-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT CONTRACT SERVICES ADJUSTED APPROP 37,000.00 PAGE 28 JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED EXPEND EXPEND 3,014.20 36,237.61 77,627.00 .00 72,580.31 .00 5,046.69 93.5 189,671.00 .00 135,342.70 .00 54,328.30 71.4 267,298.00 .00 207,923.01 .00 59,374.99 77.8 3401-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3401-4304 TELEPHONE 50.00 .00r 00 00 50.00 0.0; 3401-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 800.00 .00 .00 .00 800.00 0.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 850.00 .00 .00 .00. 850.00 0.0 DIAL A RIDE 305,148.00 3,014.20 244,160.62 .00 60,987.38 .80.0 3403 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 3403-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3403-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 525.00 3403-4180 RETIREMENT .00 3403-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 3403-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS .00 PERSONAL SERVICES 525.00 3403-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3403-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 3,500.00 204.00 BUS PASS SUBSIDY 4,025.00 .00 510.05 2.61-..` .00 6.42- .00 .51- .00 9.54- 510.05 .00 14.95 97.2 .00 .00 *** .00 .00. *** .00 .00 *** .00 14.95 97.2 3408 COMMUTER XPRESS 3408-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3408-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 3408-4180 RETIREMENT .3408-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3408-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES 3408-4200 3408-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES. . CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT COMMUTER XPRESS 194.46 2,204.00 2,714.05 .00 .1,296.00 63.0 .00 1,310.95 67.4 1,750.00 .00 1,338.74 .00 411.26 76.5 .00 11.58- .00 .00 .00 *** .00 9.17- .00 .00 .00 *** .00 2.25- .00 .00 .00 *** 1,750.00 23.00- 1,338.74 .00 411.26 76.5 10,620.00 .00 .00 " .00 10,620.00 0.0 12,370.00 23.00- 1,338.74 .00 11,031.26 10.8 3409 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 3409-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3409-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 1,800.00 148.56 805.69 .00 994.31 44.8 3409-4200 3409-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 18,116.00 1,794.29 15,955.85 .00'. 2,160.15 88.1 RECREATION TRANSPORTATION 19,916.00 1,942.85 16,761.54 .00 3,154.46 84.2 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 341,459.00 5,128.51 264,974.95 .00 76,484.05 77.6 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 341,459.00 5,128.51 264,974.95 .00 76,484.05 77.6 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 4200 4208. 4208-4200 4208-4201 DESCRIPTION. CONST/ENG/ENF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STUDY CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8100 STREET SAFETY 8150 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 8150-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8150-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8150-4180 RETIREMENT 8150-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8150-4189 FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 8150-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8150-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 412,532.00 13,772.00 34,202.20 1,459.80 376,870.00 8.6 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 16TH - 425,485.00 16TH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE 29 ADJUSTED .JUNE 1999-00. ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 2,000.00 .00 2,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 10,947.00. ; 1,706.83 7,344.83 .00 3,602.17 67.1 820.00 135.61 563.37 .00 256.63 68.7 1,027.00 212.37 576.70 .00 450.30 56.2 159.00 26.26 109.08 .00 49.92 68.6 12,953.00 2,081.07 8,593.98 .00 4,359.02 66.3 15,853,.07 42,796.18 427,485.00 15,853.07 44,796.18 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 1,459.80 381,229.02 10.4 381,229.02 10.8 44,796.18 1,459.80 381,229.02 10.8 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 150 GRANTS FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 2100 POLICE 2110 BCHD DOM VIOLENCE ADVOCACY PGM 2110-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 2110-4102 REGULAR SALARIES .00 178.90 447.25 2110-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME .00 .00 232.23 2110-4112 PART TIME TEMPORARY 16,830.00 25.00 1,350.00 2110-4180 RETIREMENT .00 13.50 49.50 2110-4187 UNIFORMS .00 1.24 3.10 2110-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .00 24.33 97.58 2110-4189 FICA ..00 ' 1.91 103.28 PERSONAL SERVICES` 16,830.00 - 244.88. 2,282.94 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT • JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED APPROP JUNE EXPEND 1999-00. EXPEND ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED 2110-4200 CONTRACT. SERVICES 2110-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,180.00 2110-4300 2110-4304 2110-4309 2110-4317 4100 4104" 4104-4200 4104-4201 8100 8139 8139-4200 8139.4201 8300 8302 8302-4200 .8302-4201 8304 8304-4100 8304-4102 8304-4180 . 8304-4188 .8304-4189 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER TELEPHONE 450.00 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 215.00 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 1,325.00 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,990.00 BCHD DOM VIOLENCE ADVOCACY PGM 20,000.00 102.00 447.25- 232.23- 15,480.00 47.25232.23-15,480.00` 8.0 49.50- 3.10- *** 97.58- *** 103.28- *** 14,547.06 13.6 PLANNING COASTAL PERMIT AUTH GRANT CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE STREET SAFETY STPL STREET IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE STORM DRAIN USED OIL RECYCLING PROGRAM CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8,959.00 16TH ST. STORM DRAIN IMPROVMNTS PERSONAL SERVICES .00 .00 .00 2,384.94.. 23,166.00 823.64 11,187.47 35,412.00 10,620.00 10,620.00 450.00 0.0 215.00 0.0 1,325.00 0.0 1,990.00 0.0 17,615.06 11.9 .23- 100.0 24,160.50 631.50 98.2 39.50 2,077.00 76.8. 3,485.00 6,842.50 REGULAR SALARIES 16,103.00 1,040.08 9,552,53 .00 6,550.47 RETIREMENT 1,206.00 83.04 732.65 .00 ,473.35 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,510.00 60.46 626.94 ,.00 883.06 FICA 234.00 16.07 141.83 .00 92.17 PERSONAL SERVICES 19,053.00 1,199.65' 11,053.95 .00 7,999.05 CONTRACT. SERVICES 59.3 60.8 41.5 60.6 58.0 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 150 GRANTS FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION • 8304-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 16TH ST STORM DRAIN IMPROVMNTS 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 8621 PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES 8621-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8621-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8624 8624-4200 8624-4201 DWNTWN PKG'STRUCTURE/LOT C CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE 31 ADJUSTED JUNE:_ 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE %-USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1,268,747.00 .00 .00 1,287,800.00 1,199.65 11,053.95 .00 1,268,747.00 0.0 .00 1,276,746.05 0.9 100,000.00 72,448.00 72,448.00 14,976.07 12,575.93 87.4 1,100,000.00 109,971.39 1,099,713.89 ..O0 286.11 100.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 2,575,337.00 198,792.56 1,214,250.75 51;154,83 1,309,931.42 49.1 GRANTS FUND 2,575,337.00 198,792.56 1,214,250.75 514154.83 1,309,931.42 49,1 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 3700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL 3701 EMISSION CONTROL 3701-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3701-4327 AQMD INCENTIVES 1,500.00 36,492.00 PAGE 32 1999-00 EXPEND, ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED 34,992.00 2,916.44 34,992.00 EXPENDITURE CONTROL AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 36,492.00 445.00 35,437.00 35,437.00 1,055.00 29.7: 1,055.00 97.1 1,055.00 97.1 08/02/00 07:05:46 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 153 2100 POLICE 2106 C.O.P.S. PROGRAM 2106-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2106-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 3,000.00 .00 3,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS,REPORT JUNE 2000. ADJUSTED JUNE 1999700 ENCUMB. APPROP EXPEND EXPEND PAGE 33 BALANCE % USED 2106-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2106-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 2106-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2106-5600 2106-5601 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS BUILDINGS C.O.P.S. PROGRAM. EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,912.00 .00 3,849.65 .00 1,937.65-. 201.3 54,822.00 .00 44,945.80 .00 9,876.20 82.0 56,734.00 .00 48,795.45 .00 7,938.55 86.0. 1,218.00 .00 .00 .00 1,218.00 0.0 60,952.00 .00 51,795.45 .00 9,156.55 85.0. 60,952..00 .00 51,795.45 .00 9,156.55 85.0. 9,156.55 - 85.0 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 155 ACCOUNT # CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE / USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4398 RESDL EQUITY TRSFR OUT EXPENDITURE CONTROL CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 4,939.23 50.0 4,939-23 50.0 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 160 SEWER FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS' 3102 SEWERS/STRM DRAINS 3102-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3102-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 203,225.00 17,272.87 191,619.47 .00 11,605.53 94.3 3102-4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 7,200.00 204.69 3,370.60 .00 3,829.40 46.8 3102-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN6,841.00 .00 .00 .00 6,841.00 0.0 3102-4180 RETIREMENT 15,096.00 1,287.18 14,273.42 .00 822.58 94.6 3102-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 25,539.00 1,913.58 20,191..17 .00 5,347.83 79.1 3102-4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 2,155.00 126.75 1,351.03 .00 803.97 62.7 PERSONAL SERVICES 260,056.00. 20,805.07 .230,805.69 .00 29,250:31 88.8 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS -REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE 35 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. .BALANCE % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 3102-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 3102-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 148,620.00. 41,644.81 3102-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOV'T 3,400.00 .00 CONTRACT SERVICES 152,020.00 , '41,644.81 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER. 3102-4303 UTILITIES 983.00 91.03 1,060.26 .00 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 12,600.00 2,630.92 9,759,59 .00 3102-4395 EQUIP REPLACEMENT CHARGES 21,453.00 1,785.00. 21,453.00 .00 3102-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 32,825.00 2,740:00 32,825.00 .00 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 67,861.00 7,246.95 65,097.85 .00 164,208.98 .00 164,208.98 115.96 15,704.94- 110.6 .00 • 3,400.00 0.0 115.96 12,304.94- 108.1 3102-5400 3102-5402. EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE EQUIP-MORE'THAN $1,000 SEWERS/STRM:'DRAINS 8100 STREET SAFETY 8150 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 16TH 8150-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES :8150-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE' 8300 STORM DRAIN 8305 INSTALL CDS CLARIFIER UNITS 8305-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8305-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8306 INSTALL CATCH BASIN INSERTS 8306-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8306-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8,438.00 .00 1,600.00 481,537.00 30,000._00 152,898.00 64,899.00 .00 .00 69,696.83 460,112.52 .00 .00 77.26- 107.9 2,840.41, 77.5 .00 100.0 .00 100.0 2,763.15 95.9 .00 1,600.00 0.0 115.96 21,308.52 95.6 .00 30,000.00 0.0 .00 .00 .00 152,898.00 0.0 .00 8400. SANITARY SEWER 8409 MANHOLE REPAIRS 8409-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES .00 .00 -.00 64,899.00 0.0 .00 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 160 SEWER FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ACCOUNT #' DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND 8409-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8410 • SEWER REHAB/LOMA DISTRICT 8410-4200 CONTRACT.SERVICES 8410-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8600 8621 8621-4100 8621-4102 8621-4180 8621-4188 8621-4189 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS PIER ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES PERSONAL SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES 1,070.00 RETIREMENT 89.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 107.00 FICA 18.00 PERSONAL SERVICES '1,284.00 135,000.00 24,455.66 1999-00, ENCUMB., BALANCE % USED EXPEND ' 24,455.66 6,619.34 103,925.00 23'.0 .00 1,069.11 .00 .89 99.9 .00 88.01 .00 .99 98.9 00 106.54 .00 .46 99.6 .00 17.05 .00 .95 94.7 .00 1,280.71 .00, 3.29 99.7 8621-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8621-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE PIER" ARCHITECTURAL UPGRADES PIER RENOVATION/PHASE III PERSONAL SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES RETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 8630 8630-4100 8630-4102 8630-4180 8630-4188 8630-4189 8630-4200 8630-4201 CONTRACT SERVICES. CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE PIER RENOVATION/PHASE III EXPENDITURE CONTROL SEWER FUND 50,000.00 51,284.00 32,355.00 32,355.00 3,595.00 14,050.00 71.9. 32,355.00. 33,635.71 3,595.00 14,053.29 72.6 4,691.00 .00 .00 .00 4,691.00 343.00 .00 .00 , .00 343.00 433.00 .00 .00 .00 433.00 65.00 .00 .00 .00 65.00 5,532.00 .00 .00 .00 5,532.00 178,684.00 .00 • .00 184,216.00 .00 .00 1,142,672.00 126,507.49 518,203.89 1,142,672.00 126,507.49 518,203.89 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .00 178,684.00 0.0 .00 184,216.00 0.0_. 579,737.81 49.3 579,737.81 49.3 44;730.30 44,730.30 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 2100 POLICE 2103 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 2103-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 2103-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 5,000.00 136.40 1,058.90 .00 3,941.10 21.2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE'2000 ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP 'EXPEND 1999-00 ENCUMB. EXPEND PAGE 37 BALANCE % USED 2103-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2103-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN' $1000 13,000.00 1,502.17 13,765.83 1,077.09 1,842.92- 114.2 '2103-5402 EQUIP-MORETHAN $1,000 19,832.00 .00 20,111.06 .00 279.067 101.4 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE - 32,832.00 1,502.17. 33,876.89 1,077.09 2,121,98 106.5 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 37,832.00 1,638.57 34,935.79 1,077.09 1,819.12 95.2 8600 8622 8622-4200 8622-4201 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE EXPENDITURE CONTROL ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 53,000.00 .00 .00 .00 53,000.00 0.0 90,832.00 1,638.57 34,935.79 1,077.09 54,819.12 39.6 90,832.00 1,638.57 34,935.79 1,077.09 54,819.12 39.6' EXPPRIN2.; 08/02/00 07:05:46 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND ACCOUNT .# DESCRIPTION 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 2200 FIRE 2202 FIRE PROTECTION 2202-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2202-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 2202-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 FIRE PROTECTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED APPROP JUNE EXPEND 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED EXPEND 73,868.00 6,155.63 73,868.00 .00 00' 100.0 17,316.00 4,100.00 21,416.00 8600 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS. 8610 FIRE STA UPSTAIRS REMODEL/ADDN 8610-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 8610-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 10,271.00 8610-4180 RETIREMENT 769.00 8610-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 963.00 8610-4189 FICA 150.00 PERSONAL SERVICES 12,153.00 8610-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8610-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 287,847.00 .00 .00 FIRE STA UPSTAIRS REMODEL/ADDN 300,000.00 .00 3,982.61 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 395,284.00 6,155.63 98,801.19 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 395,284:00 6,155.63 98,801.19 .00 .00 .00 16,609.75 4,340.83 20,950.58 .00 .00 .00 .00 3,415.43 .00'' 271.73 .00 242.88 .00 •52.57 .00 3,982.61 706.25 95.9 240.83- 105.9. 465.42 97.8 .00 6,855.57 33.3 .00 497.27 35.3 .00 720.12 25.2 .00 97.43 35.0 .00 8,170.39 32.8 .00 287,847.00 0.0 .00 296,017.39 1.3 .00 296,482.81 25.0 .00 296,482.81 25.0 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT 8100 STREET SAFETY 8139 STPL STREET IMPROVEMENTS 8139-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8139-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8141 STREET REHAB. 8141-4200- CONTRACT SERVICES 8141-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8143 MONTEREY/19TH TO HERMOSA AVE 8143-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES. 8143-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 8143-4180 RETIREMENT' 8143-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8143-4189 FICA` PERSONAL SERVICES 8143-4200 ••CONTRACT SERVICES 8143-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE MONTEREY/19TH TO HERMOSA AVE 8150 HERMOSA AVE/PIER TO 16TH 8150-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8150-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE APPROP EXPEND EXPEND . PAGE 39 8,861.00 .00 8,860.86 .00 .14 4,588.00 1,380.00 1,380.00 3,139.50 68.50 12,524.00 .00 12,524.00' .00 3,349.00 .00 3,348.88 .00 265.00 .00 264.14 .00 319.00 .00 318.75 .00 53.00 .00 52.04 00' 3,986.00 .00 3,983.81 .00 209,666.00 213,652.00 16,235.85 16,235.85 164,642.30. 168,626.11 % USED 100.0 98.5 .00 100.0 .12 100.0 .86 99.7 .25. 99.9 .96 98.2 2.19 99.9 .00 45,023.70 78.5 .00 45,025.89 78.9 40,640.00 8182 UTIL UNDRGRND/MYRTLE AVE 8182-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8182-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 8400 SANITARY SEWER 8410 SEWER REHAB/LOMA DISTRICT 8410-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8410-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 43,600.00 345,128.00 21,263.00 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 17,615.85 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 345,128.00. 17,615.85 .00 43,600.00 191,390.97 46,739.50 106,997.53 69.0 191,390.97 .00 100.0 46,739.50 106,997.53 69.0 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 8100 STREET SAFETY 8160 DWNTWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8160-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8160-4201 .CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE EXPENDITURE CONTROL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 PAGE ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 APPROP EXPEND EXPEND ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED 25,944.00 .00 25,522.10 .00 421.90 98.4 25,944.00 .00 25,522.10 .00 421.90 98.4 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 25,944.00 .00 25,522.10 .00 421.90 -I 98.4 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND. ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER, 1299-4399 OPERATING TRSFR OUT .�. 8100 STREET SAFETY 8182 UTIL UNDRGRND/MYRTLE AVE: 8182-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8182-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1,545,988.00 187,305.44 925,253.17 173,571.97 447,162.86 71.1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND 1999-00 .ENCUMB BALANCE EXPEND PAGE 41 USED 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 .00' 100.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,550,988.00 192,305.44 930,253.17 173,571.97 447,162.86 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR FUND. 1,550,988.00 447,162.86 71.2 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 308 LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 'ACCOUNT # ' DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER OUT 1299-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1299-4399 'OPERATING TRSFR OUT 8100 STREET SAFETY 8183 UTIL UNDRGRND/LOMA DR" 8183-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 8183-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE EXPENDITURE CONTROL LOMA UTIL UNDRGRND IMPROV FUND 1,703,284.00 PAGE 42 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED EXPEND 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 .00 100.0 1,698,284.00 11,537.00 1,010,789.47 100,768.86 1,703,284.00 16,537.00 1,015,789.47 100,768.86 586,725.67 65.6 1,015,789.47 100,768.86 586,725.67 65.5 16,537.00 586,725.67 65.6 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 705 INSURANCE FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1209 LIABILITY INSURANCE 1209-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1209-4102 REGULAR SALARIES 32,101.00 2,584.23 32,484.23 .00 383.23- 101.2 1209-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 2,087.00 .00 .00 .00 2,087:00 - 0.0 1209-4180 RETIREMENT. 2,326.00 186.98 2,354.19 .00 28.19- 101.2, 1209-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,433.00 321.41 3,851.37 .00 581.63 86.9 1209-4189 FICA 335.00 38.89 488.56 .00 153.56- 145.8 PERSONAL SERVICES', 41,282.00 3,131.51 39,178.35 .00 2,103.65 94.9 1209-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1209-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1209-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1209-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 28.44- 783.71 .00 283.71- 156.7 1209-4315 MEMBERSHIP 320.00 .00 310.00 .00 10.00 96.9 1209-4317 CONFERENCE/TRAINING 4,070.00 .00 344.10 .00 3,725.90 8:5 1209-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 350,000.00. 8,611.97 122,196.86 .00 227,803.14 34.9 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 354,890.00 8,640.41 123,634.67 .00 -231,255.33 34.8 LIABILITY INSURANCE 436,428.00 11,815:67 176,922.85 .00 259,505.15 40.5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS`. REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND 1999-00 ENCUMB. EXPEND PAGE '43 BALANCE % USED 14,109.83 .00 26,146.17 35.1 1210 -AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 1210-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1210-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 20,305.00 .00 15,479.57 1210-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1210-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 10,000.00 .00 2,637.96. AUTO/PROPERTY/BONDS 30,305.00 .00 18,117.53 4,825.43 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT. 1215-4100 PERSONAL:SERVICES 1215-4186. UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 1217 WORKERS COMPENSATION` 1217-4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ' 1217-4102 REGULAR SALARIES. 1217-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1217-4180 RETIREMENT 1217-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1217-4189 , FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 10,000.00 1217-4200 .CONTRACT SERVICES 1217-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1217-4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT CONTRACT SERVICES 1217-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 7,362.04 26.4 12,187.47 59.8 _Oct 2,231.00 32,101.00 2,584.27 2,004.00 .00 2,326.00 187.04 4,433.00 321.53 335.00 38.91 41,199.00 3,131.75 32,484.65 .00 2,354.79 3,852.42 488.65 39,180.51 383.65- 101.2 2,004.00 0.0 28.79- 101.2 580.58 `.86.9 153.65- 145.9 2,018.49 95.1 39,000.00 2,333.33 38,262.96 .00 737.04 98.1 5,000.00 .00 2,185.84 .00 2,814.16 43.7 44,000.00 2,333.33 40,448.80 .00 3,551.20 "91.9 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 705 INSURANCE FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE: % USED APPROP EXPEND EXPEND 1217-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1217-4317 TRAINING/CONFERENCE 1217-4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,200.00 .00 16.26 2,500.00 .00 1,534.10 500,000.00 71,912.78 589,730.83 503,700.00 71,912.78 591,281.19 588,899.00 77,377.86 670,910.50 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,065,632.00 INSURANCE FUND 89,193.53 868,181.88 .00 1,183.74 1.4 .00. 965.90 61.4 .00 ' 89,730.83-.117.9 .00 87,581.19- 117.4` .00 82,011.50- 113.9 00 197,450.12 81.5 1,065,632.00 89,193.53 868,181.88 .00 197,450.12 81.5 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 715 ACCOUNT # 07:05:46 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND DESCRIPTION 1200 MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT 1202 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1202-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER , 120274900 DEPRECIATION` 1202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1206 ` INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1206-4100, PERSONAL SERVICES 1206-4102 _REGULAR SALARIES 1206-4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1206-4180. RETIREMENT 1206-4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1206-4189 ' MEDICARE BENEFITS PERSONAL SERVICES 1206-4200 1206 -4201 - CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 1206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1206-4304 TELEPHONE 6,430.00 1206-4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 3,400.00 1206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,000.00 1206-4315 MEMBERSHIP 120.00 1206-4317. CONFERENCE/TRAINING 960.00 1206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 1,656.00 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 16,566.00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB. APPROP' EXPEND EXPEND 150.00 .00 43.14 .00 200.00 .00 104.95 .00 350:00 .00 148.09 .00' 2,500.00 2,850.00 .00 .00 00 148.09 .00 .00 PAGE 45 BALANCE % USED 106.86 95.05 201.91 28.8 52.5 42.3 2,500.00 0.0 2,701.91 5.2 42,576.00 3,429..00 41,148.00 :00 1,428.00 96.6 127.00 .00 .00 .00 127.00 0.0 3,189.00 240.04 2,880.48 .00 308.52 90.3 2,443.00 240.24 2,898.15 .00 455.15- 118.6 617.00 49.72 596.64 .00 20.36 96.7 48,952.00 3,959.00.. 47,523.27 .00 1,428.73 97.1 53,889.00 1206-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 1206-5401 EQUIP -LESS THAN $1,000 6,950.00 1206-5402 EQUIP -MORE THAN $1,000 29,700.00 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 36,650.00 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 156,057:00 1208 1208-4900 1208-4901 2100 2101 2101-4300 2101-4310 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT POLICE POLICE MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,189.00 23,000.00 7,977.73 47,571.68 2,475.00 3,842.32 92.9 450.12 4,566.09 .00 1,863.91 71.0 180.41 3,513.12 .00 113.12- 103.3 862.97 4,491.22 .00 491.22- 112.3 .00 120.00 .00 .00 100.0 .00 392.50 .00 567.50 40.9 138:00 1,656.00 .00 .00 100.0 1,631.50 14,738.93 .00 1,827.07 89.0 949.75 5,362.59 .00 1,587.41 77.2 1,200.51 22,909.39 :00 6,790.61 77.1 2,150.26 28,271.98 .00 8,378.02 77.1 15,718.49. 138,105.86 2,475.00 15,476.14 90.1 .00 .00 .00 1,189..00 0.0 5,149.77 27,952.02 .00 4,952.02-. 121.5 EXPPRIN2' 08/02/00 07:05:46 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED APPROP JUNE EXPEND 2101-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 37,000.00 ; 7,210.53 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 60,000.00 12,360.30 2101-4900. DEPRECIATION 2101-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 75,857.00 2101-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2101-5403 VEHICLES 176,700.00 POLICE 312,557.00 2200; FIRE 2201 FIRE 2201-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER . 2201-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4,000.00 1,312.04 7,386.59 .00 3,386.59- 184.7 2201-4311. AUTO MAINTENANCE 6,000.00 913.50 11,175.66 .00 5,175.66- 186.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 10,000-00 2,225,54 18,562.25 .00 8,562.25- 185.6 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED EXPEND 39,371.63 67;323.65 .00 7,323.65- 112.2 .00 2,371.63- 106.4 .00 848.21 13,208.51 .00 170,221.74 237,545.39 75,857.00 0.0 .00 6,478.26 96.3 .00 75,011.61 76.0 2201-4900 DEPRECIATION 2201-4901 DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT 2201=4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES DEPRECIATION .2201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2201-5403 VEHICLES FIRE 2600 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING' 2601 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 2601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,900.00 448.79 2,026.78 . .00 126.78- 106.7 2601-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,249.00 266.99 1,359.85 .00 889.15 60.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER •4;149.00 715.78 3,386.63 .00 762.37 81.6 • .00 100.00 0.0 .00 60,581.00 0.0 .00 60,681.00 0.0 300,000.00 .00 295,443.01 370,681.00 2,225.54 314,005.26 .00 4,556.99 98.5 .00 56,675.74 84.7 2601-4900 2601-4902 DEPRECIATION • DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 2601-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 2601-5403 VEHICLES. LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING/MEDIANS 3100 STREETS/HWYS/STRM DRAINS 3102 SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 3102-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3102-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3,500.00 30.50 327.96 .00 3,172.04. 9.4 3102-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,500.00 256.65 1,386.03 .00 113.97 92.4 3102-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,000.00 306.40 1,516.35 .00 516.35- 151.6 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 6,000.00 593.55 3,230.34 .00 2,769.66 53.8 95,000.00 106,649.00 .00 715.78 .00 3,386.63 .00 95,000.00 0.0 .00 103,262.37 3.2 3102-4900 DEPRECIATION EXPPRIN2 - 08/02/00 07:05:46 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND{ ACCOUNT # DESCRIPTION 3102-4902 CITY OF: HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE 1999-00 ENCUMB: APPROP EXPEND EXPEND DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 7,500.00 3102-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE. 3102-5403 VEHICLES SEWERS/STORM DRAINS 95,000.00 108,500.00• .00 .00 .00 .00 593.55 .00 3,230,34 .00 .00 PAGE 47 BALANCE' % USED 7,500.00 0.0 95,000.00 105,269.66 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT. 3104-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 3104-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 3104-4900 DEPRECIATION 3104-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 3104-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3104-5403 ` VEHICLES TRAFFIC SAFETY/ST. MAINT, 2,050.00 374.38 2,579.24 2,000.00 272.02 2,567.05 4,050.00 646.40 5,146.29 0.0 3.0 .00 529.24- 125.8 .00 567.05- 128.4 .00 1,096.29- 127.1. 6,250.00. .00 .00. 0.0 3300 PARKING FACILITIES 3302 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3302-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER_ 3302-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES . 7,500.00 860.59 4,867.29 .00 2,632.71 64.9 3302-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 9,000:00 335.59 11,049.20 .00 2,049.20- 122.8 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 16,500.00 1,196.18 15,916.49 .00 583.51 96.5 .00: 81,250.00 0.0 .00 86,403.71 5.6 3302-4900 DEPRECIATION 3302-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 23,540.00 .00 .00 3302-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 3302-5403 VEHICLES 19,080.00 .00 19,080.15 .00 :15- 100.0 .3302-5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS 104,121:00 .00 104,001.32 .00 `. 119.68 99.9. .EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 123,201.00 .00 123,081.47 .00 119.53 99.9 COMMUNITY SERVICES 163,241.00 1,196.1& 138,997.96 .00 24,243.04 85.1 23,540.00 0.0 3700 .3701 3701-5400 3701.5403 4200 4201 4201-4300 4201-4310 4201-4311 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/FEDERAL .EMISSION CONTROL EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE. VEHICLES 53,583.00 -'CONST/ENG/ENF COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES AUTO. MAINTENANCE MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER. 4201-4900 DEPRECIATION 625.00 1,100.00 1,725.00 275.91 4.95 280.86 1,032.45 .00 407.45- 165.2 979.06 .00 120.94 89.0 2,011.51 .00 286.51- 116.6 EXPPRIN2 08702/00 07:05:46 ACCOUNT # 4201-4902 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND DESCRIPTION DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 0.0 4201-5400 EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4201-5403 VEHICLES 40,000.00 34,588.04 34,588.04 COMMUNITY DEV/BUILDING 44,225.00 34,868.90 36,599.55 4202 P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS, 4202-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4202-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,600.00 - 581.93 2,734.96 .00 1,134.96- 170.9 4202-4311: AUTO MAINTENANCE 2,500.00 270.00 2,383.08 .00 116.92 95.3 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4,100.00 851.93 . 5,118.04 .00 1,018.04- 124.8 4202-4900 DEPRECIATION 4202-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 7,500.00 .00 .00 .00 7,500.00 0.0 .00 5,411.96 86.5 .00 7,625.45 82.8 4202-5400. EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4202-5403 VEHICLES 15,008.00 .00 14,568.92 .00 439.08 97.1'` P.W. ADMINISTRATION/PARKS26,608.00 _ 851.93 19,686.96 .00 6,921.04 74.0 4204 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4204-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 700.00 4204-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 700.00 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1,400.00 4204-4900 DEPRECIATION 4204-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 28.11 49.36 77.47 596.04 337.03 933.07 4206 4206-4100 4206-4102 4206-4106 4206-4111 4206-4112 4206-4180 4206-4188 4206-4189 EQUIPMENT SERVICE PERSONAL SERVICES REGULAR SALARIES REGULAR OVERTIME ACCRUAL CASH IN PART TIME TEMPORARY RETIREMENT EMPLOYEE, BENEFITS FICA PERSONAL SERVICES 4206-4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4206-4201 CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 4206-4251 CONTRACT SERVICES/GOV'.T CONTRACT SERVICES 4206-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4206-4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 79,510.00 500.00 3,659.00 .00 5,956.00 7,470.00.• 442.00 97,537.00 2,500:00 1,000.00 3,500.00 6,751.76 .00 .00 .00 509.40 594.42 38.68 7,894.26 960.35 .00 960.35 80,703.62 159.62 683.41 .00 6,101.96 7,189.91 464.57 95,303.09. 2,180.75 200.00 ,2,380.75 .00 103.96 85.1 .00 362.97 48.1 .00 466.93 66.6 .00 900.00 0.0 .00 1,366.93 ' 40.6 .00 .00 •'.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 '.00 3,000.00 .520.96 2,867.32 1,193.62- 101.5. 340.38 31.9 2,975.59 18.7 .00 *** 145.96- 102.5 280.09 96.3 22.57- 105.1 2,233.91 97.7 .00 319.25 87.2 .00 800.00 20.0 .00 1,119.25 68.0 .00 132.68 95.6 EXPPRIN2 08/02/00. ACCOUNT # 07.05:46 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED APPROP JUNE 1999-00 'ENCUMB. EXPEND. EXPEND PAGE 49 BALANCE % USED 4206-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,600.00 36.26 896.30 .00: 703.70 56.0 4206-4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,100.00 152.97 ',.2,103.00 .00 1,003.00- 191.2 4206-4396 INSURANCE USER CHARGES 11,681.00 978.00 11,681.00 .00 .00 100.0 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 17,381.00 1,688.19 17,547:62 .00 166.62- 101.0 4206-4900 4206-4901 DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION/MACH/EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT SERVICE .00 .00 :00 .00 118,418.00 10,542.80 115,231.46 .00 .00 *** 3,186.54 97.3 4600 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 4601 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4601-4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4601-4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1,200.00 50.07 865.20 .00 334.80 72.1 4601-4311 -AUTO MAINTENANCE 1,150.00 4.95 1,386.22 .00 236.22- 120.5 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2,350.00. 55.02 2,251.42 .00 98.58 95.8 4601-4900 DEPRECIATION 4601-4902 DEPRECIATION/VEHICLES 1,700.00 .00 .00 .00 1,700.00 0.0 COMMUNITY RESOURCES 4,050.00 55.02. 2,251.42 .00 1,798.58 55.6 8600 8622 8622-4200 '8622-4201 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS ADA COMPLIANCE, CITY HALL CONTRACT SERVICES CONTRACT SERV/PRIVATE 83,000.00 .00 .00 .00 83,000.00 0.0 EXPENDITURE CONTROL 1,645,458.00 80,700.57 1,068,850.20 2,475.00 574,132.80.. 65.1 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,645,458.00,, 80,700.57 1,068,850.20 2,475.00 574,132.80 65.1. EXPPRIN2 08/02/00 07:05:46 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE CONTROL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED JUNE APPROP EXPEND 1999-00 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED -EXPEND 35,960,659.00 2,892,500.41 25,060,227.58 GRAND TOTALS 35,960,659.00 2,892,500.41 25,060,227.58 1,732,618.01 9,167,813.41 74.5 08/02/00 07:05:46 DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND 105 LIGHTG/LANDSCAPG DIST FUND 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT FUND 110 PARKING FUND 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 117 AB939 FUND 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND 125 PARK/REC-FACILITY TAX FUND 126 4% UTILITY USERS TAX FUND 127 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND 137 MYRTLE DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 138 LOMA DIST ADMIN EXP FUND 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 145 PROPOSITION.'A FUND 146 PROPOSITION 'C FUND 150 GRANTS FUND 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST FUND 153 SUPP LAW ENF SERV (SLESF) 155 CROSSING GUARD DIST FUND 160 SEWER FUND 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFT FUND 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 301 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT FUND 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDRGRND IMPR 308 LOMA UTIL:UNDRGRND IMPROV 705 INSURANCE -FUND 715 EQUIPMENT"REPLACEMENT FUND FUND FUND FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE RECAP REPORT JUNE 2000 ADJUSTED APPROP JUNE EXPEND 1999-00 EXPEND 15,808,791.90 1,489,469.12 13,584,162.11 848,206.00- 86,587.39 693,840.36 1,008,514.00 109,122.37 641,226.27 1,836,924.00 156,859.28 1,776,389.78 368,942.00 33,580.63 357,556.53 55,938.00 2,336.81 20,996.70 79,101.00 .00 70,581.76 2,847,410.00 231,720.05 1,286,574.39 660,188.00 11,675.13 49,091.33. 588,232.00 17,233.68 209,376.23 134,821.00 .00 745.00 4,378.00 14.00 91.00 5,533.00 14.00 26.00 296,856.00 493.29 1,448.36 341,459.00 5,128.51 264,974.95 427,485.00 15,853.07 44,796.18 2,575,337.00 . 198,792.56 1,214,250.75 36,492.00 2,966.44 35,437.00 60,952.00 .00 51,795.45 9,878.00 .00 4,938.77 1,142,672.00 126,507.49 518,203.89 90,832.00 1,638.57 34,935.79 395,284.00 6,155.63 98,801.19 345,128.00 17,615.85 191,390.97 25,944.00 .00 25,522.10 1,550,988.00, 192,305.44 930,253.17 1,703,284.00 16,537.00 1,015,789.47 1,065,632.00 89,193.53 868,181.88 1,645,458.00 80,700.57 1,068,850.20 ENCUMB. BALANCE % USED 418,701.86. 1,805,927.03 109,817,17 44,548.47 16,050.18 . 351,237.55 4,000.00 56,534.22 7,030.00 4,355.47 .00 34,941.30 .00 8,519.24. 675,369.87 885,465.74 540.00 - 610,556.67 79,131.58 299,724.19 .00 134,076.00 .00 4,287.00 .00 5,507.00 .00 295,407.64 .00 76,484.05 1,459.80 381,229.02 51,154.83_ 1,309,931.42 .00 1,055.00 .00 9,156.55 .00 - 4,939.23 44,730.30 579,737.81 1,077.09 54,819.12 .00 296,482.81 46,739.50 106,997.53 .00 .. 421.90 173,571.97 447,162.86 100,768.86 586,725.67 .00 197,450.12 2,475.00 574,132.80 88.6 94.7 65.2 96.9 98;8 37.5 89.2 68.9 7.5 49.0 0.6 2.1 0.5 0.5 77.6 10.8 49.1 97.1 85.0 50.0 49.3 39.6. 25.0 69.0 98.4 71.2 65.6 81.5 65.1 35,960,659.00 2,892,500.41 25,060,227.58 1,732,618.01 • 9,167,813.41 74.5 - TREASURER'S REPORT - FUND GENERAL NUMBE ACCOUNT 001 GENERAL 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING 109 DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT 110 PARKING 115 STATE GAS TAX 117 AB939 119 COMP ABSENCES 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 121 PROP A OPEN SPACE 125 PARK REC FAC TAX 126 RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY 127 BUILDING IMPROVMENT FUND 137 MYRTLE ADMIN EXP FUND 138 LOMA ADMIN EXP FUND 140 COMM DEVELOP. BLOCK GRANT. 145 PROPOSITION A FUND 146 PROPOSITION C FUND 150 GRANT FUND 152 AIR QUALITY MGMT DISTRICT 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFOR SVC 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 170 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 305 LWR PIER ASSMNT DIST IMPR FUND 307 MYRTLE UTIL UNDERGRND IMPR 308 LOMA UTIL UNDERGRND IMPROV 610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMP 615 r. MYRTLE AVE DIST HARDSHIP FUND 6/30/00 ADJUSTMENT BALANCE $5,519,465.24 $1,035,608.45 $8,279.86 ($802,785.08) ($475,668.49) $5,284,899.98 $589,986.93 $690.74 ($65,195.32) ($8,315.66) $517,166.69 $575,880.85 $135,174.01 $5,226.30 ($48,103.90) ($645.35) $667,531.91 $136,812.76 $190,049.49 $11,452.77 ($93,921.35) . ($79,097.32) $165,296.35 $54,846.11 $64,179.96 $35,052.51 ($1,300.16) ($28,486.26) $124,292.16 $272,493.72 $339.18 ($1,348.91) ($286.92) $271,197.07 $718,745.61 $718,745.61 $15,647.73 $19.45 ($0.89) $15,666.29 ($563,105.25) $65,967.00 ($255,823.21) ($1,960.41) ($754,921.87) $731598.75 $914.77 ($1,921.88) ($68.41) ' $732,523.23 $401,894.91 $495.89 ($9,329.36) ($165.88) $392,895.56 $151383.50 $191.43 ($8.73) $151566.20 $4,379.55 $5.26 $4,384.81 $5,620.86 $6.72 $5,627.58 ($328.09) ($133.03) ($24.28) ($485.40) $36,637.66 $19,947.15 $88.22 ($3,676.48) ($419.41) $52,577.14 $863,617.99 $16,589.80 $1,082.54 ($9,341.21) ($330.25). $871,618:87 $101,747.15 ($15,920.25) • ($72,631.76) $11195.14 $4,432.83 $5,488:22 $7.06 ($44.37) ($2,923.14) $6,960.60. $16;432.12 $20:58 ($0.93) $16,451.77 $2,652,733.68 $522.00 $68,123.23 ($64,099.88) ($6,846.73) $2,650,432.30 ,' $127,254.90 $157.87 ($1,576.91) ($7.19) $125,828.67 $408,583.85 $1,542.50 $507.33 • ($6,178.75) $404,454.93 $841,653.29 $238,456.57 ($17,615.85) ($54.15) $1,062,439.86 $57,950.62_ $72.45. ($3.29) $58,019.78 $809,945.70 $6,030.10 $963.19 ($77,965.02) ($5,043.90) $733,930.07 $803,825.13 $945:27 ($88,309:71) ($5,043.09) $711,417.60 $20,142.95 $23.96 $20166.91 $91.00 $91.00 617 MYRTLE REDEMPTION FUND $120478.70 $5,146.10 $125,624.80 618 LOMAREDEMPTION.FUND. $100351.53 $5,122.33 $105,473.86 705 INSURANCE FUND $2,452,792.60 $147,154.35 ($59,540.78) ($1,095.26) $2,539,310.91 715 EQUIP. REPLACEMENT FUND $1,470,731.60 $147.50 $59,178.44 ($27,174.41) ($2,776.67) $1,500106.46 900 INVESTMENT FUND $0.00. $3,774.17 $14,375:00 ($18,149.17) $0.00 $19,508,726.48 $1,479,053.35 $670,066.37 ($1,645,127.07) ($716,232.29) $19,296,486.84 TRUST ACCOUNTS BALANCE BALANCE 6/1/00 DEPOSITS CHARGES 6/30/00 PAYROLL• $3,000.00 $756,461.16 ; $756,461:16 $3,000.00 BANK BALANCE CABLE TV DEPOSIT $10,000.00 $10,000.00 GENERAL $1,039,153.15 TRUST ACCTS . $19,111.67 $18,507,311.22 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $620,507.03 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE WORKMAN, CITY TREASURER OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT $1,058,264.82 $256,089.20 $802,175.62 $18,507,311.22 BALANCE $19,309,486.84 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. Attached is a report of all inactive Public Deposits for the month of June 2000. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, J . . Workman pity reasurer NOTED: NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Slept -1'1'1' Burr -II Viki Copeland City Manager Finance Director 1d� INVESTMENT REPORT - DATE OF DATE OF ` CARRY MARKET FACE INSTITUTION . TOTAL INVESTMENTS MATURITY VALUE VALUE VALUE INTEREST LAIF 6/1/00 6/30/00 CORPORATE NOTES: Associates Corp North Amer Citicorp U.S. TREASURY BONDS/NOTES: United States Treasury Note United States Treasury Note U.S. GOV'T AGENCY BONDS/NOTES Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn U.S. GOV'T AGCY -STATE TAX EXEMPT U.S. GOVT AGCY -STATE TAX EXEMPT DISC Federal Home Loan Bank $499,962.90 3/29/99 3/29/01 $499,900.00 5493.830.00 $500,000.00 5.250% Federal Home Loan Bank $499,957.21 3/23/00 2/15/02 $499,950.00 S498,360.00 S500,000.00 6.770% Federal Home Loan Bank $495,761.30 4/26/00 5/1/02 $495,482.50 " $498,205.00 $500,000.00 6.770% $14,368,155.24 ($400,000.00) $13,968,155.24 5.800% $500,089.67 12/11/97 9/15/00 $501,190.00 $499,445.00 $500,000.00 6.260% $498,883.40 6/21/99 2/15/01 $497,050.00 $495,385.00 5500,000.00 5.680% $500,593.28 $500,000.00 $555,483.88 8/5/99 6/30/01 $501,132.81 $496,330.00 $500,000.00 11/26/99 9/30/01 $500,000.00 $494,685,00 $500,000.00 2/23/99 5/2/01 $564,366.00 $547,250.00 $487,735.00 $488,424.34 02/04/00 03/15/02 $485,670.00 $550,000.00 5500,000.00 5.790% 5.690%. 6.430% 5.510% INVESTMENT TOTAL $18,507,311.22 $4,544,741.31 $4,511,225.00 $4,550,000.00 5.960% In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. ' Investments in the report meet the requirements of the City of Hermosa Beach's adopted investment policy. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, JOHN ' W CITY R KMAN RER July 31, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council For the City Council Meeting of August 8, 2000 Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council accept donations received by the City to be used as follows: Hermosa Kiwanis Foundation — $500.00 - to be used for Chevron Surf Camp instructors. Entertainment Lighting Service - $10,000.00 — to be used for community (Coyote Ugly Promotion) events. (Council action 6/27/00) South Bay Coalition - $1,000.00 - to be used for summer youth activities at the Skate Track: Respectfully submitted: Concur Valerie Mohler Viki .Copeland Accounting Supervisor Finance Director 41 1111 /V *-411/1/ f Step -n rell City Manager c: \donation 2000.doc le Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 27, 2000 Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 PROJECT NO. CIP 98-621 PIER RENOVATION, PHASE II AND PROJECT NO. CIP 00-630 PIER RENOVATION, PHASE III - TRANSFER OF FUNDS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve increasing the contract amount for Los Angeles Engineering Inc., the general contractor, by approximately $59,478, to cover anticipated change orders involving railing, water line, expansion joints and lighting; 2. Approve increasing the contract amount for Concept Marine Associates Inc. (CMA), the construction manager, by $21,000 to cover the added construction management fees for the extended duration needed to complete Phase 11; and 3. Authorize the transfer of $53,000 from CIP 00-630 Pier Renovation, Phase III - General Fund `to CIP 98-621 Phase 11 Pier Renovation, Phase 11 - General : Fund in order to make the funds available. Background: On January 25, 2000 City Council awarded the contract for Project No. CIP, 98-621 to Los Angeles Engineering based on their bid amount of $1,168,771.00. The contingency amount was $116,877, 10% of the original contract price. Since then, Change Order Nos. 1, 2 and 3 have added $95,027 and were applied to the contingency.' These change orders cover a wide assortment of items including changes to the railing and the addition of sewer and water lines to bring the restroom building south of the project back online. In addition, the recent Change Order No. 4 involving the revised lighting fixtures amounts to $39,478 and will exceed the available Lighting Fund by approximately $26,000. Change Order No. 4 remains uncharged pending the approval of Recommendations 1 and 3. There will be change orders in the near future to:' 1) modify the railing at the sags in the pier; 2) change the expansion joint material in joints over 2 %2" wide; 3) move the water line point of connection; and 4) to cover the extra lumber cost for Alaskan Yellow Cedar for the railing. The projectedcost for these upcoming change orders is approximately $20,000. Due to changes to the project since the beginning of construction, the duration of the project has increased accordingly. As of Change Order No. 4, 36 working days have been if added to the contract with Los Angeles Engineering. Therefore, the need to extend CMA's construction management services has increased by approximately 7 weeks. Extension of CMA's construction management services amounts to approximately $21,000,' which ' would raise their original contract amount from $75,000 to $96,000. The contingency amount for this contract was originally $7,500 which was exceeded by $1,230 in the Construction Management Change Order No. 1. The total cost associated with the change orders, executed and anticipated, when applied against the contingency, previously re -appropriated funds and budget adjustments, indicates an additional $53,000 is needed to complete the project. Analysis: The project will exceed the current total budget, including contingencies, and createa need for approximately $53,000 in addit(onal funds. A transfer of funds from Project No. CIP 00-630 Pier Renovation, Phase III budget (001 General Fund account), will provide the funding necessary to complete Project No. CPP 98- 621 Pier Project, Phase II. Originally, Phases I, II, and III were all part of one major Pier Project. This project was split into three phases to expedite the completion of the project. Transferring funds between phases would be budget readjustments to the Pier Project as a whole. Fiscal Impact: Transfer funds as follows: ACCOUNT CIP 00-630 Municipal Pier Renovation, Phase III — General Fund (001-8630-4201) CIP 98-621 Municipal Pier Renovation, Phase Il General Fund (001-8621-4201) AMOUNT $53,000_. $53,000 Respectfully submitted, Tristan D. Malabanan Assistant Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: '1_ Viki Copeland, Finance Director Concur: 4 4 Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Ste pp he 0:: urre City Manager o F:\B95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\98-621 BUDGET TRANSFER.doc Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 27, 2000 Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 PROJECT NO. CIP 98-621 PIER RENOVATION, PHASE 11- PROGRESS REPORT Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. Summary: The project start date was March 6, 2000. The original contract time was 120 working days. The anticipated completion date was August 21, 2000. The critical path consists of the gate and railing. Revisions and approvals for the railing and pier lighting have extended the contract time 36 working days due to changes made to the railing - the critical path of this project. The estimated completion date is now October 11, 2000. Change Orders: Four (4) Change Orders issued to date. Change Order No. 2, in the amount of $35.,950.00, was for the existing restroom building south of the site — work outside the original scope of this project. Revisions to the railing and pier lighting were covered by items in Change Orders 1,3 and '4 (lighting $37,478.38 and railing - $54,228.03). Future Change Orders: One additional Change Order is anticipated. Work Completed: Contractor has completed the deck delamination repairs and the deck crack repair to the top of the deck. SpaII repairs, epoxy crack injection and the anti-corrosion/inhibitor coating to the bottom of the deck between bents 22 and 25 have been completed. The joint material at all construction and expansion joints at the pile caps from the bulkhead to the end of the pier has been removed. The new water line from the bulkhead to the end of the pier that feeds the new hose bibbs and fish cleaning stations has been completed and removal of all items from the side and under the pier, which required removal, have been removed. The additional work on the sewer and water line for the existing restroom building south of the pier has been completed as well. Work in Progress: The electrical subcontractor is in the process of running conduit for the new pier bollard lights and for power and telephone for the foghorn at the end of the pier. Work Remaining: Items remaining to be done under this contract include: electrical and telephone to the foghorn control cabinet at the end of the pier, pier lighting, handrail and gates, finish deck coating, benches and fish cleaning stations. Conclusions: The critical path of this job has always been the fabrication and installation of the handrail and gates. All changes that have been made to these items are now in place contractually. These changes and approvals to the railing, along with revisions to the pier lighting, have added 36 working days to this contract: Further delays are not anticipated and Staff recommends that no additional changes to the design be made: The railing installation is scheduled to begin the first of September :and is to be completed by the end of the first week of October. The revised light bollards are scheduled to arrive the first week of September as well. The finish deck coating and the installation of the fish cleaning stations and benches all follow the completion of the railing. The revised completion date of October 11, 2000 looks very reasonable. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Harold C. Williams, P.E. Stephen ;i. Burrel Director of Public Works/City Engineer City Manager 2 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council August 1, 2000 Regular Meeting August 8, 2000 AUTHORIZATION TO FUND REPAIR OF TRACKED FRONT -LOADER (CATERPILLAR) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the appropriation of $9,000 from the Equipment Replacement Fund for the repair of the tracked front -loader (caterpillar). Background: The tracked front -loader (caterpillar) is in need of major repair. The last time this piece of equipment was repaired was in 199$ when the caterpillar needed repainting (due to the harsh sea air) and the track came off. It again needs painting and the hydraulic system is not functional. The estimated cost of repair is $16,200 and, since $7,200 has already been appropriated in the FY 2000-01 budget, an additional appropriation of $9,000 is needed. This is a critical piece of equipment used in maintaining and clearing the beach storm drains. Response time in opening the outfalls is most important with regard to flood control .operations. Replacement cost for a similar piece of equipment is $229,000.00. Leasing the equipment would cost $3,000 per month plus delivery and pick-up fees. Analysis: .Due to the critical nature of the use of the caterpillar, not having it in proper working condition could result in failure to maintain the storm drain openings thereby causing flooding in the Downtown and residential areas at Beach Drive and Hermosa Avenue. The most economical and expedient avenue for the City would be to appropriate the additional $9,000. Fiscal Impact: Appropriate $9,000 from the Equipment Replacement Fund. Alternatives: Authorize the appropriation of $9,000 from the Equipment Replacement Fund for the repair of the tracked front -loader (caterpillar). 2: Purchase a new tracked front -loader (caterpillar) for approximately $229,000.00. 3. Rent the caterpillar during the rainy season or on an as -needed basis at the monthly rate of $3,000/month plus delivery and pick-up fees. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Michael Flaherty Public Works Superintendent Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Cope and Finance Director Harold. C. Williams,, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Steph City M nager rel RB95\PWFILES\CCITEMS\caterpillar repair 8-8-00.doc Honorable Mayor and Members of_, the Hermosa Beach City Council July 20 2000 Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 AWARD CONTRACT FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY MUNICIPAL STORM WATER PROGRAM Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: Approve the Professional Services Agreement with John L. Hunter & Associates, Inc. to administer the City's Municipal Storm Water Program and implement NPDES permit requirements for an amount of $44,000; Appropriate $4,000 from the Sewer Fund to increase the appropriated FY 2000-01 budget from $40,000 to $44,000 for this program; and Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney. Background: John L. Hunter & Associates, Inc. (JLHA) has been assisting the City for the past seven years with the implementation of the NPDES Permit. JLHA's contract with the City identifies tasks such as inspection of businesses, design of the planning program for runoff pollution mitigation, assisting the City crews with operational compliance, public education programs and employee training. In addition, JLHA represents the City as the Chair of the Santa MonicaBay'Ballona Creek Watershed, which enables the City to direct the member cities to follow and support its position 'on different issues as they arise. JLHA was on all six subcommittees developing the Model programs (Public Outreach, Illicit Discharges, Planning, Construction, Public Agency and Industrial/Commercial). Their intimate involvement with this process has made it easier for the City to gain a better understanding of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board's requirements as well as protecting the City's interests and resources. The City of has been able to maintain its position on the leading edge without excessive costs. JLHA has helped the City obtain approval for a grant fund of approximately $500,000 to install catch basin inserts and a Continuous Deflection Separator (CDS) treatment facility for the reduction of trash and debris discharged from the City. This will enhance the quality of the. immediate receiving waters adjacent to the City (ocean). These projects will be considered as Best Management practices, which the Board may consider for the proposed trash limits (TMDL Total Maximum Daily Loads which will set a daily limit by the Water Board on the amount of pollutants that can be discharged. Analysis: The State of California, through the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, is continuing to enforce the Municipal NPDES Permit and its Management Plan (Models). All cities within Los Angeles County are required to adopt and implement programs consisting of six model programs (Public Outreach, Illicit Discharges, Planning, Construction, Public. Agency and Industrial/Commercial) that are consistent with such Models. The Board has announced that there may be random audits of the citiesprograms to ensure compliance. JLHA's proposal will provide continued assistance to the City in the complex implementation of these programs. The current Permit will expire June 2001. Preliminary discussions at the Board level have already begun for the future Permit process. This dynamic development of the Permit and its components (i.e. total maximum daily loads) may have a larger impact on the City in the future. JLHA has been keeping the City informed and updated of all the changes as well as taking an active part in minimizing the requirements for the City. Fiscal Impact: An amount of $40,000 has been appropriated by the City Council for compliance with the NPDES Storm Water Permit for FY 2000-01: The amount of the contract is $44,000, therefore, an additional appropriation of $4,000 from the Sewer Fund is requested at this time: The net administration cost to the City would be approximately $40,000 since the County has entered into an agreement with the City that it will provide funding to the City for at least a portion of the cost of performing site visits citywide within four years. A total of 112 site visits are scheduled for the 2000-2001. The reimbursement is estimated to be $4,000 for FY 2000-01 ($34.00 per restaurant and $50.00 for other facilities). Approve staff's recommendation. Deny staff's recommendation and order staff to do the work by hiring additional staff, which will require training and occasional help from consultants. Take no action, this may expose the City to litigation.. Attachment: 1 Professional Services Agreement 2. Sample of Public' Outreach materials Respectfully submitted, Concur: Homayoun Behboodi Associate Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Concur: .4 Step '' R. $firrell. City Manager. FB95/pwfiles/ccitems/stoup water award hab PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 8th day of August, 2000 at Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, through its duly elected, qualified and acting MAYOR, hereinafter called the CITY, and John L. Hunter & Associates, Inc., hereinafter called the CONSULTANT. WITNESSETH: That the CONSULTANT for and in 'consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the CITY herein expressed, does hereby ` agree to furnish to the CITY professional services and materials, as follows: ARTICLE I - Scope of Work CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in the plans and specifications or the scope of work attached as Exhibit "A". ARTICLE II Costs The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work or any part of the work. performed under this Agreement at the rates and in the manner established in the e attached Bid Proposal. Total expenditure made under this contract shall not exceed the sum of $44,000. This fee includes all expenses, consisting of all incidental blueprinting, photography, travel, and miscellaneous costs, estimated to be accrued during the life of the contract. It also includes any escalation or inflation factors anticipated. No increase in fees will be allowed during the life of the contract. Any increase in contract amount or scope shall beby express written amendment approved by the CITY and CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for costs incurred in the performance hereof as are allowable under the provisions of Part 1-14 of the Federal Procurement Regulations. ARTICLE III Method of Payment CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed monthly in arrears based upon the hourly services provided. CONSULTANT shall submit invoices in triplicate and addressed to theCITY, do the Finance Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254- 3884. ARTICLE IV - Subcontracting CONSULTANT shall not be permitted to subcontract any portion of this contract without the express written consent of the CITY. ARTICLE V - Completion Date CONSULTANT shall commence work under this agreement upon execution of this agreement and shall complete the work according to the schedule submitted as part of Exhibit "A", however, the CITY's Director of Public Works may extend the completion date as required by the scope of this contract. Any contract time extension shall require the express written consent of the Director of Public Works. ARTICLE VI - Accounting Records CONSULTANT must maintain accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs . incurred which records and documents shall be kept available at the CONSULTANT's California office during the contract period and thereafter for ,three years from the date of final payment of Federal funds hereunder. ARTICLE VII Ownership of Data All data, maps, photographs, and other materia l collected or prepared under the contract shall become the property of the CITY. ARTICLE VIII Termination. This contract may be terminated at any time for breach and the CITY may terminate unilaterally and without cause upon seven (7) days ` written notice to the CONSULTANT. All work satisfactorily performed pursuant to the contract and prior to the date of termination may be claimed for reimbursement. ARTICLE IX - Assignability CONSULTANT shall not assignor transfer interest in this contract without, the prior written consent of the CITY. ARTICLE X - Amendment It is mutually understood and agreed that no alteration or variation of the terms of this contract, or any subcontract requiring the approval of the CITY, shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties hereto, and approved by all necessary parties. ARTICLE XI - Non -Solicitation Clause The CONSULTANT warrants that he or she has not employed or retained any company or persons, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration,. contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the CITY shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or, in its discretion to deduct from the , contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. ARTICLE XII Equal Opportunity Assurance During the performance of this contract, the CONSULTANT agrees as follows: A. The CONSULTANT will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, sex, creed, color or national origin. The CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, sex, creed, color or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following; employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoffs or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. B. The CONSULTANT will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, sex, creed, color or national origin. C. The CONSULTANT will permit access to their books, records and accounts by the applicant agency, the State, the Federal Highway Administration and/or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with this nondiscrimination clause. D. In the event of the CONSULTANT's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract, this contract may be canceled, terminated or suspended in whole or in part.. ARTICLE XIII Clean Air Act During the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean. Air Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1857 et seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) as amended. ARTICLE XIV Indemnity CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify the CITY, its officers, employeesand agents against, and will hold and save each of them harmless from, any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or, property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision ` or other organization arising out ofthe negligent acts or intentional tortious acts, errors or omissions of CONSULTANT, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, provided for herein. CONSULTANT will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection herewith. CONSULTANT will promptly pay any judgment rendered against CITY, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities. In the event CITY, its officers, agents or. employees is made a party to any action or. proceeding filed or prosecuted against CONSULTANT for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the sole negligence of CONSULTANT hereunder, CONSULTANT agrees to pay CITY, its officers, agents, or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by CITY, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to reasonable attorney's fees. ARTICLE XV Insurance A. Without limiting CONSULTANT'S obligations arising under ARTICLE XIV Indemnity , CONSULTANT shall not begin work under this Agreement until it obtains policies of insurance required under this section. The insurance shall cover CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives and employees in connection with the performance of work under this Agreement, and shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Insurance coverage shall be as follows: i. Automobile Liability Insurance with minimum coverages of $500,000 for property damage, $500,000 for injury to one person/single occurrence, and $500,000 for injury to more than one person/single occurrence. ii. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance, insuring CITY its elected and appointed officers, agents, and employees from claims for damages for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from CONSULTANT'S actions under this Agreement, whether or not done by CONSULTANT or anyone directly or indirectly employed by CONSULTANT.: Such insurance shall have a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000. iii. Worker's Compensation Insurance for all CONSULTANT'S employees to the extent required by the State of California. B. Deductibility Limits for policies referred to in subparagraphs A (i) (ii) and (iii) shall not exceed $5,000 per occurrence. C. Additional Insured. City, its elected and appointed officers, agents, and employees shall be named as additional insureds on policies referred to in subparagraphs A (i) and (ii). D. Primary Insurance. The insurance required in paragraphs A (i) (ii) and (iv) shall be primary and not excess coverage. E. Evidence of Insurance. Consultant shall furnish CITY, prior to the execution of this Agreement, satisfactory evidence of the insurance required, issued by an insurer authorized to do business in California, and an endorsement to each such policy of insurance evidencing that each carrier is required to give CITY at least 30. days prior written notice of the cancellation of any policy during the effective period of the Agreement. All required insurance policies are subject to approval of the City Attorney. Failure on the part of CONSULTANT to procure or maintain said insurance in full force and effect shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement or procure or renew such insurance, and pay any premiums therefor at CONSULTANT'S expense. ARTICLE XVI - Enforcement of Agreement In the .event that legal action is commenced to enforce or declare the rights created under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of costs and reasonable attorney's feesin the amount to be determined by the court. ARTICLE XVII Conflicts of Interest No member of the governing body of the CITY and no other officer, employee, or agent of the CITY who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and the CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. ARTICLE XVIII Independent CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT is and shall at all times remain as to the CITY a wholly independent consultant. Neither the CITY nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of the CONSULTANT or any of the CONSULTANT'S employees, except as herein set forth. The CONSULTANT shall not at any time or in any manner represent that, it or any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the CITY. ARTICLE XIX - Entire Agreement of the Parties This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the employment of CONSULTANT by CITY and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect such employment in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement. acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement or amendment hereto shall be effective unless executed in writing and signed by both CITY and CONSULTANT. ARTICLE XX Governing Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and all applicable federal statutes and regulations as amended: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONSULTANT MAYOR: Mayor, City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: Elaine Doerfling, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney F:1B95\PWFILES\PSA Hunter & Assoc 8-8-OO.doc The following scope of work is to continue providing services to assist the City in the implementation of NPDES permit requirements for the 2000-2001 fiscal year. This scope of work is based upon the current NPDES permit and the associated model programs: {1) Illicit Discharge and Connections, (2) Development Planning, (3) Development Construction, (4) Public Agency and (5) Public Outreach. Included within the Public Outreach program are "Educational Site visits" for many businesses. Program Management a. Represent the City at the Ballona Creek Watershed Committee. Attend and report on the NPDES Executive Advisory Committee. A monthly written update will be prepared which will include a summary of pertinent meetings, regulatory actions and deadlines. ($2,400) b. Participate in the NPDES program development including applicable subcommittees and taskforces. Participate in, coordinate and keep the city informed of NPDES developments: next NPDES permit which is scheduled to be implemented in July 2001; TMDLs. Trash and litter Baselines & Monitoring and review changes and modifications to the model programs. ($4,600) c. Prepare 2000-01 budget, annual reports, watershed management plans as required by the NPDES permit and submit to the Regional Board via Los Angeles County by July 2000. ($2,800) Illicit Connections/Discharges a. Conduct dry weather surveillance and report observations. ($370) b. Conduct wet weather surveillance and report observations. ($684) c. Review the existing public reporting and response system and recommend modifications to promote, publicize and facilitate public reporting of illicit discharges and illicit disposal practices. ($340) d. Perform 2 [est.] illicit discharge investigations in response to complaints or observations of violations. ($720) EXHIBIT A e. Violation follow-ups as requested by the City ($ TBA). Development. Planning and Development Construction a. Develop forms and conduct a training session with both Building and Planning for- implementation orimplementation of the model programs. ($750) b. Assist the planning and building departments throughout the year with implementation of their respective programs to maintain compliance with the NPDES permit and conduct an annual review. ($1,600) and review up to four SWPPP or SUSMP submittals. c. Provide guidelines for developers and contractors for the preparation of Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plans (SUSMP) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans. ($2,440) d. Provide permit recommended modifications of the CEQA checklist and outline of general plan changes. ($250) e Develop sample legal authority in accordance With the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan requiring developers to incorporate long term BMPs into their project design. ($1,000) Public Agency a. Conduct mid -year and annual reviews of public agency activities and recommend improvements ($3,000): • Sewage System Operations • Public Construction Activities Vehicle Maintenance/Materials Facilities Management Landscape and Recreational Facilities Management • Storm Drain Operation and Management based upon existing City records Streets and Roads Maintenance Parking Facilities Management Public industrial Activities Emergency Procedures Update Public agency NPDES Manual which will include: ($1,250) b1. Review current procedures and BMPs to prevent stormwater pollution from sewer system operation.= b2. Generic public works specifications and NPDES guidance for reducingstormwater pollution from public construction projects, b3: BMPs for parks and recreational facilities for incorporating NPDES concerns into routine maintenance activities. b4. A review of current storm drain maintenance procedures and guidance for incorporating BMPs into routine activities. (Based on easily accessible existing documentation). • b5. Included BMPs for reducing stormwater pollution from street and road maintenance. b6. Guidance and procedures for reducing stormwater pollution from public parking facilities management. b7. A survey of existing emergency procedures and capabilities and prepare d NPDES guidance document for incorporating BMPs into emergency responses: c. Conduct 1 training session for Public Works staff. ($750) d. Development of procedures to upgrade operating procedures based upon findings of the quarterly and annual reviews. (est. $1,500) Site Visits a. Perform site visits at facilities in accordance with the Industrial -Commercial Education Program. This entails visits to approximately 44 businesses involved in food handling and 51 other types of businesses ($4,046). Los Angeles County will reimburse for the cost of this item. b. Maintain the site visit database. (included) c. Update and submit reports to the County as specified in the NPDES Permit to achieve the maximum available reimbursement. (included) Trash and Litter a. The Regional Board has issued three items regarding the discharge of trash and litter for cities in Los Angles County. These are the "Notice to Meet and Confer" (NTMC) and the draft Trash TMDL. and 13267 investigation. These may necessitate the preparation of Special Program Amendments and monitoring studies. The Board has not yet established criteria for. these items. For initial budgetary purposes, estimate $3,500. Public Outreach The activities planned for the 2000-2001 year Will complete the requirements of the model program. We are proposing to develop and implement campaigns and activities that will specifically target businesses and residents thereby helping Hermosa Beach do its part to reduce storm water pollution. ($12,000) While the cost of development is included above; we estimate vendor costs for production and distribution of brochures, pamphlets, PSAs, promotional items etc. to be approximately $5,000 (included above), dependent upon the number produced and printing style [black and white, color, etc] as requested by the City. Estimated Costs Task ' FY 2000-01 Program Management, Reporting & Coordination with Watershed $9,800 Illicit Connections/Discharges $2,114 Development Planning* $3,020 Development Construction* $3,020 Public Agency $6,500 Trash and Litter $3,500 Public Outreach General Public Business Community Schools Public Employees $4,850 $5,500 $1,650 included Amount recommended for Public Outreach Vendors . included Site Visits (Reimbursable) $4,046 Total $44,000 Amount reimbursed by County <$4,0461> Final Cost to City after reimbursement $39;954 *Only includes training in the program process and up to plan review for four sites, Does not include training of plan checkers on how to review plans for NPDES compliance. Does not include rewriting sections of the General Plan. Costs do not include special projects or orders or reports required by the Board, which were not specifically in the municipal permit or the associated model programs. John L. Hunter & Associates appreciates the opportunity to offer our services to continue assist the City with the implementation of the NPDES stormwater permit and the model programs. Compliance with the NPDES program requires active city participation and thorough implementation of best management practices. The NPDES permit is still evolving and therefore, the costs herein are subject to change. The program will be on a time and materials basis, based on the written scope of work, With the total cost not to exceed the estimated amount without prior City. approval. Maintenance - -If you perform the upkeep on your vehicles yourself, take your used motor oil, antifreeze and other toxic solvents to collection centers. -Fix oil, radiator and transmission leaks. Don't leave oil slicks to wash off in the rain. -Clean up spills with an absorbent material such as kitty litter. Check with your hazardous waste collection center for disposal recommendations. Cleaning - -Take your car to a car wash where the wash water is diverted to the sewage treatment plant. -If you wash your car at home - Use an environmentally safe soap that is biodegradable and divert water to your lawn rather than the storm drain. Mantenimiento de su Automovil - - Si mantiene su auto, Ileve el aceite usado, anticongelante y otros solventes a centros de coleccion. - Arregle autos que tengan fugas del radiador, tranmision o motor. Si el pavimento contiene aceite, Ifmpielo antes que las Iluvias Ileguen. - Si derramo aceite en el piso, Ifmpielo usando polvo absorbente. Pregunte a su centro de coleccion de como depositar materiales peligrosos. Lavando su Auotmovil - - (leve su carro a un lava carros. El agua sucia es desechada al drenaje y no a los desagiies del agua pluvial. - Si lava su carro en su hogar-use jabon que no cause dano al ambiente y que se pueda bio-degradar. Desvie esta agua sucia a su patio/panto y no a Ia los desagiies pluviales. re Trash and Litter - Place trash and litter that cannot be recycled or reused in trash cc1Jtpit cans. Pool and Spa - To drain water, let the water sit for at least 72 hours without adding chemicals. The chemicals will evaporate and become less harmful to aquatic life. If algae is present - you need to chlorinate your pool or spa first, then let water sit. Household Products - Cleaning solutions and solvents contain toxic elements. Buy household products such as baking soda, white vinegar, borax or chemicals labeled "nontoxic." Take unwanted household hazardous waste materials to a Household Hazardous Waste collection event. Call (310) 318-0212 or (888)CLEAN-LA for more information. Paint and Solvents- -Water based paint - When using water based paints, clean brushes in the sink. Don't pour clean-up water down the storm i drain. -Oil based paint - Dispose of oil based products and solvents at a hazardous waste collection event. Limpieza del Hogar - Deposite basura que no se pueda reciclar en el bote de la basura. Alberca y «Spa» - Para desechar el agua, deje que el agua se estanque por lo menos setenta dos (72) horas sin agregar quimicos. Los quimicos se evaporizaran y haran menos clan() a la vida aquatica. Si existe alga, primero necesita echarle cloro a Ia alberca y dejarla estancada un tiempo. Productos Domesticos- Soluciones de limpieza y solventes contienen elementos toxicos. Use productos domesticos como vinagre, borax o quimicos que no sean toxicos. Lleve desperdicios peligrosos a un centro de coleccion. Para mas informacion (lame al (310) 318-0212 o (888) -CLEAN -LA. Pintura y Solventes - -Cuando use pintura de agua- limpie las brochas en el lavavo. No lave las brochas afuera en Ia calle-.11la posibilidad que Ilegue esta agua contaminada a los dela lies plug iv ales. -Pinturas de aceite- deposite pinturas de aceite en centros de coleccion. -` What is storm water pollution? dk Storm water pollution is the untreateNI .contaminated water that drains from the streets of Hermosa Beach through the municipal storm drain system into the Pacific Ocean. The largest source of storm water pollution in. "Hermosa Beach is us, the general public! The most common Pollutants found in the drain.are: trash such as: fast-food wrappers, cigarette butts and styrofoam cups; and toxins like used motor oil, antifreeze,fertilizer, pesticides and pet droppings. Why do we have storm water pollution? Basically anything dumped or dropped on the ground or` in the .gutter contributes to storm water pollution: All -pollutants are picked up by water (rain, hoses, sprinklers, etc) and drained from `streets, parking -lots and; lawns into the storm drain em. This"toxic soup" flows through a massive system of pipes and, open' channels -straight into the ocean untreated! i Que es la contamination de aguas pluviales? Esto sucede cuando el agua contaminada es desechada a las calles de la cuidad, a los desagues pluviales y luego directamente al Oceano Pacifico. El publico'es el que ma's contribuye ala contamination del agua' pluvial., Los cotaminantesmas comunes en' los. desagues son: basura, colillas de cigarro, basos de «styrofoam» ; toxicos tomo aceite de motor, anticogelantes, fertilizantes, pesticidas y desperdicios de mascota. i Por que existe la contamination de agua pluvial? Basicamente todo to que es desechado al piso o en el desague contribuyea la contamination de agua pluvial. Estos contaminantes son levantados por la corriente de agua pluvial y depositados en los desagues. Estos toxicos corren por un sistema de pipas y canales-directamente al oceano-sin tratamiento. Thrity of Hermosa Beach Stormwater Program For further information call: The Public Works Department (310) 318-0212 or (888) CLEAN -LA This information was made available to you through the City of Hermosa Beach Storm Water Program. We thank participating businesses for partnering with us to get this information to you. Programa de Agua Pluvial de la Ciudad de Hermosa Beach Para mas information communicate al Departamento de Obras Publicas, al (310) 318-0212 O (888) CLEANLA Esta information a sido dis - onible por medio del Program de Agua Pluvial d Hermosa Beach. Nos gustarpa dar las gra -ids a los neg�cios que ro n participaayudarnos a tr i rile esta information. Developed by John L. Hunter and Associates Resident POP Brochure 6/00 The City of Hermosa Beach and participa businesses have -joined together to provide you inforn about Sfor-m Water Pollution in our City. Can'you Help curb Storm Water Pollution? Yes! When you wash your car, hose down the driveway or over water your>lawn,'.you are washing debris and toxins into the storm drain. These toxins and debris cause disease, waterpollution and endanger wildlife. We are working to.reduce our overall contribution to storm water pollution and need your help! Every citizen in Hermosa Beach can make a difference. Just change a few current habits and you -can reduce storm water pollution - it's that simple: We have provided you with a few tips on what you can do. For more information call our Public Works Department at (310) 318-0212. Remember - Storm drains were designed to keep neighborhoods from flooding during storms; they lead directly to the ocean and not a treatment plant. La Ciudad de Hermosa Beach y negocios participantes se han unido para traerles informacion acerca de la contaminacion del agua pluvial en nuestra ciudad. i Puedes ayudar en prevenir Ia contaminacion del agua pluvial? Si! Cuando lavas tu auto, riegas el pasto, estas lavando toxicos y basura dentro de los desagiies de agua pluvial. Existe la posibilidad que estos toxicos puedan causar enfermedades, contaminacion del agua y danar a los animales salvajes. Estamos trabajando para reducir la contaminacion del agua pluvial y necesitamos tu ayuda! Todos los residentes de la ciudad tienen la responsabilidad de proteger al ambiente. jSolo cambia un poco tus habitos y podrias reducir la c ntaminacion del agua pluvial -es asi de facil. En este folleto hemi os-incluido unas ideas para que nos pedas`aaudar con este problema. Para mss informacion communicate al Departamento de Orbas Pubilcas, al (310)318-0212;0.. Recuerda-Los desagues del'agua pluvial estan disenados para prevenir inund"scion en tjempo de Iluva. El agua pluvial escurre directamenl o,ceano y no a una planta de tratamiento. C.e (114 Pesticides, Herbicides and Fertilizers - - Be sure to apply sparingly and carefully. - Rather than chemicals, use biological controls such as plants and beneficial insects to control pests. - Do not apply chemicals if rain is forecast. Rain or over watering causes the chemicals to flow at full potency directly into the storm drains. These toxic chemicals are dangerous to our water resources. Lawn Clippings -. - Use a broom rather than a hose to clean up garden clippings. Deposit the leaves and clippings in the trash or a compost pile. Insecticidas, Herbicidas y Fertilizantes - -Aplique estos compuestos con cuidado y lo menos posible -en vez de quimicos, usa controles biologicos como plantas o insectos que consumen plagas. Desperdicios del f ardin - -Use una escoba en vez de una manguera para limpiar el desperdicio de su jardin. Tire las ojas/pasto en Ia basura o en su monton de compuestos. g)1 Ccuz,d Pick up after your pet! Dispose of pet waste by flushing it down the toilet or use plastic bags to dispose of in the trash. Pet waste contains harmful bacteria which spreads serious diseases when in our waterways. Cleaning your Pet - - When shampooing, follow label directions for disposal of shampoos and dips; they can be toxic. - When brushing, dispose of fur in the trash. Desperdicios de su Mascota - Despues de que su mascota haga sus necesidades-limpie el desperdicio. Deposite el desperdicio de su mascota en el sanitario o use una bolsa de plastico y depositelo en la basura. Los desperdicios de su mascota contienen bacteria que pueden causar enfermedades si contaminan al agua potable. La Limpiesa de su Mascota - -Cuando aplique champu, siga las instrucciones de como desechar el champu- siempre existe la posibilidad que el champu sea toxico. -Si cepilla a su mascota, deseche el pelo en la basura. GIDAiat saiaeA 9aCetAiLom, fiko}e ta aa w411, riA,? &jeAnYtilA4111 i,cizin- , arta, yitkaal can/Lisp ? Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council • July 26, 2000 Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 PROJECT NOS. CIP 96-153 & 96-156 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT 14TH STREET AND 13TH STREET AT HERMOSA AVENUE — ACCEPTANCE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council Accept the work by Inspection Engineering Construction (IEC) of Costa Mesa, California, for Project Nos. CIP 96-153 & 96-156 Traffic Signal Improvements at 14th Street and 13th Street at Hermosa Avenue. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion. Authorize Staff to release payment to IEC (10% retained for 35 days following filing of Notice of Completion). Background: On October 12, 1999, City Council awarded the contract for Traffic Signal Improvements at the intersections of 13th and 14th Street at Hermosa Avenue to IEC. The proposed work for the project included the complete installation of traffic signals and appurtenances, controllers, emergency vehicle preemption, street lights, loops, signs, striping and street improvements. The contractor has completed the work to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer." The project was constructed according to the plans, specifications and change orders prepared by Staff, therefore, Staff recommends acceptance of the work as complete. The project was completed within the appropriated budget of $181,235. Fiscal Impact: Original Contract Amount Change Orders Total Construction Cost Funding: 115 State Gas Tax Fund 105 Street Lighting Fund Total Funding Respectfully submitted, Homayoun Behboodi Associate Engineer Noted for Fiscal .impact: Viki Copland Finance Director HB/Im $164,759 $ 15,817 $180,576 $ 10,608 $217,946 $228,554 Concur: Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Ste At - Burrell City Manager F\B95\Pwfiles\Ccitems\96-153. & 96-156 accept August 3, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council /1 OD- 6,o`? } S-7 City Council Meeting of August 8, 2000 Resolution Approving Memorandum of Understanding Between the City and the Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Hermosa Beach Firefighters' Association. Background: The City Council directed staff to meet and confer with representatives of this employee group to discuss wages, hours, and working conditions contained in the Memorandum of Understanding that expired on June 30, 2000. On July 18, 2000, the parties reached a tentative agreement on the terms described below. The members of the employee group met and have approved the tentative agreement. The negotiated major changes include: Term of the agreement is to be July 18, 2000 through June 30, 2003. Salary increases of 3.5% effective January 1, 2001 for Firefighter, Firefighter/Paramedic, and Fire Engineer. 4.5 % effective January 1, 2001 for Fire Captain. 3% effective July 1, 2001 for Firefighter, Firefighter/Paramedic, and Fire, Engineer. 4% effective July 1, 2001 for Fire Captain. 5% effective July 1, 2002 for Firefighter, Firefighter/Paramedic, Engineer. 6% effective July 1, 2002 for Fire Captain. Amendment to the City's Contract with the Public "Employees Retirement System to implement the retirement formula known as "3% @ 55 Changes to premium pay including promotion eligibility pay, paramedic, State Fire Officer, and EMT certification, and. longevity pay. Minor changes in the areas of adding contributions towards retiree medical insurance supplements and jury duty. The fiscal impact for this group is $95,862 for the 2000-2001 fiscal year. Funding for this has been included in Prospective Expenditures account of the 2000-2001 Budget. 111 Respectfully submitted: Mich I -Earl Pers nnel & Risk Management Director i�11 0 Stephen Burrell City Manager Firefighters RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, employees of the City of Hermosa Beach, California represented by the Hermosa Beach Firefighters Association, have elected tomeet and confer with the City of Hermosa Beach on matters concerning wages, hours, and working conditions; and, WHEREAS, the above personnel have selected certain individuals to represent them; WHEREAS, Employee and Management representatives have jointly negotiated a Memorandum of Understanding which has been ratified by a majority vote of the members of the Hermosa Beach Firefighters Association; and WHEREAS, the Employee and Management representatives have mutually agreed to recommend that the City Council adopt this Memorandum of Understanding. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach resolves to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding to be effective for the period of July 18, 2000 through and including June 30, 2003, and authorizes the City Manager to sign the Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at which time same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF JULY 2000, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, Califomia ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney Firefighters MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE HERMOSA BEACH FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I - PREAMBLE This Memorandum of Understanding .has been entered into pursuant to the laws of the State of California and the City of Hermosa Beach, hereinafter referred to as the City, and has been executed by the. City Manager on behalf of the City, and the Hermosa Beach Firefighters, hereinafter referred to as the Association. ARTICLE 2 - RECOGNITION Pursuant to the Association's petition to the City dated March 25, 1982, and applicable State laws, Firefighters' Association is acknowledged by the City as the majority representative of the employees in the following classifications: Firefighter Firefighter/Paramedic Fire Engineer Fire Captain It is understood that Fire Captains are included in the bargaining unit. However, because of the nature of the department and the lack of another supervisory employee rank between Fire Captain and. Fire Chief, Fire Captains will be permitted to function as management. Part of the duties of the Fire Captain will be to carry out the direction of management in regard to directing the work force. ARTICLE 3 — MUTUAL RECOMMENDATION This Memorandum of Understanding constitutes a mutual recommendation by the parties to the City Council. It is expresslyintended that the duties, responsibilities, and functions of the City in the operation of its Fire Department shall in no manner be impaired, subordinated, or negated by any provisions of this agreement. ARTICLE 4 — CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL It is, however, the mutual understanding of: all the parties hereto that such Memorandum of Understanding will become effective upon approval by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. Firefighters ARTICLE 5 REPEALS The provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding together with those wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment in existence prior to July 1, 1997, and are not changed by this Memorandum, shall constitute the wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment for the employees during the terms of this Memorandum of Understanding. ARTICLE 6 — EFFECTIVE AND TERMINATION DATES This Memorandum of Understanding shall become effective July 1, 1997, and will continue through June 30, 2000, with respect to all fire safety employees of the City of Hermosa Beach. During the period covered by this Memorandum of Understanding, any items concerning wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment provided by this Memorandum of Understanding shall remain in effect unless the parties agree to revise the same as a written modification to this Memorandum of Understanding, subject to the limitations expressed in Section 3504 of the Government Code. ARTICLE 7 — CONSTITUTIONALITY If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Memorandum of Understanding is for any reason held to be illegal or unconstitutional, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portion of this Memorandum, of Understanding: ARTICLE 8 - MANAGEMENT'S RIGHTS RESERVED Manage the City. Schedule working Establish, modify or change work schedules or standards. Institute changes in procedures. Direct the work force, including the right to hire, promote, demote, transfer, suspend, discipline or discharge any employee. Determine the location of any new facilities, building, departments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof, and the relocation, sale, leasing or closing of facilities, departments, divisions, or subdivisions thereof. Determine services to be rendered. Firefighters Determine the layout of buildings and equipment and materials to be used herein: 9. Determine processes, techniques, methods and means or performing work. 10. Determine the size, character and use of inventories. 11. Determine the financial policy including accounting procedures. 12. Determine the administrative organization of the system. 13. Determine selection, promotion, or transfer of employees. 14. Determine the size and characteristics of the work force. `15: Determine the allocation and assignment of work to employees. 16. Determine policy affecting the selection of new employees: 17. Determine the establishment of quality and quantity standards and the judgment of quality and quantity of work required. Determine administration of discipline. 19. Determine control and use of City property, materials and equipment. Schedule work periods and determine the number of work periods. 21. Establish, modify, eliminate or enforce rules and regulations. 22. Place work with outside firms. Determine the kinds and numbers of personnel necessary. Determine the methods and means by which such operations conducted. 25. Require employees, where necessary, to take in-service training courses during working hours. 26. Determine duties to be included in any job classifications. 27. Determine the necessity of overtime and the amount of overtime required. Take any necessary action to carry out the mission of the City in cases of an emergency. The exercise of the foregoing powers, rights authority, duties. and responsibilities by the City, the adoption of policies, rules, regulations and practices in furtherance thereof, and the use of judgment and the discretion in connection therewith, shall be limited only by the terms of this Memorandum of Understanding, City Personnel Ordinance, Personnel Rules and Regulations, current established practice, and other statutory law. Except in emergencies, or where the City is required to make changes in its operations because of the requirements of law, whenever the exercise of management's' rights shall impact on the employees of the bargaining unit, the City agrees to meet and confer with representatives of the Association, upon request by the Association, regarding the impact of the exercise of such rights unless the matter of the exercise of such rights is provided for in this Memorandum of Understanding. ARTICLE 9 — FIRE SERVICE CONSOLIDATION In the event that the City should relinquish certain managerial functions due to consolidation or merger, the. City will notify the Association in order to meet and reach an agreement with the Association where such consolidation or merger affects the hours, wages or other terms and conditions of employment of the work force of the, Fire Department. The City agrees that, should it exercise its management right to consolidate or otherwise contract out all or part of the fire safety function, all accrued [vacation, sick, comp.] time, not yet utilized as of the consolidation date shall either be paid in full or transferred to the new provider; for employees, so transferring, they shall have the choice of cash in/retention of said accrued, leaves. ARTICLE 10 — EXEMPT EMPLOYEES For purposes of FLSA pay and overtime, Fire Captains will be treated the same as non-exempt classifications. It is understood that the Captains, as management, may from time to time have to rearrange the manpower on any particular shift. ARTICLE 11 — SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION The scope of representation of the Association shall include all matters relating to employment condition and employer-employee relations including wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. Firefighters ,. ARTICLE 12 NO DISCRIMINATION Both parties to this agreement agree not to discriminate against any employee or applicant because of age, gender, race, national origin, religion, color, ancestry, marital status, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, medical condition, and/or Association membership or activity. Additionally, the City expects and requires all employees to treat one another with dignity and respect. Harassment of fellow employees is a violation of law. No employment decision may be made based upon an employee's submission to or rejection of such conduct. It is the responsibility of any employee who believes that they are the victim of such harassment, whether sexual, racial, ethnic or religious to report the conduct to their Fire Chief, Personnel Director or the City Manager in a timely manner. ARTICLE 13 -. HOURS OF WORK All employees covered by this Memorandum of Understanding shall work shifts of twenty-four (24) hours in such a manner that they average 56 hours per week. ARTICLE 14 -'7K EXEMPTION The City of Hermosa Beach has exercised its ability to take a statutory "7K" exemption for sworn fire personnel. The work period for such employees shall be twenty eight (28) days in length commencing on April 16, 1986. ARTICLE 15 - STEWARD'S ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE The City shall provide an aggregate total of three (3) shifts per year for use by the Association stewards to attend employer-employee related seminars, conferences, etc., such times subject to mutual agreement with the Fire Chief and the availability of replacement personnel. ARTICLE — REASONABLE NOTICE It is mutually understood and agreed that a copy (via the United States postal service) of the City Council and/or Personnel Board agenda for each meeting, mailed to the Association, shall constitute reasonable written notice, and notice of an opportunity to meet with such agencies, on all matters within the scope of representation upon which the City Council or Personnel Board may act. ARTICLE 17 - ACCESS TO WORK STATION The City agrees to grant official representatives of the Association the access and right to discuss any grievance or problem arising under the terms of this Agreement with any employee during working hours. It is agreed that there will be as little interference as possible by the Association Representative during the working hours of said employee. It is agreed that the Association Representative shall be permitted to conduct a reasonable amount of Association business regarding grievances during working hours without loss of pay and that the Association may use City facilities to conduct meetings when such facilities are available. ARTICLE 18 BULLETIN BOARD One bulletin board will be provided upon which the Association may post only notices of recreational, health and welfare, and social affairs, notices of meetings or election. The posting of any other classes of notices or the distribution of any written or printed notices, cards, pamphlets or literature of any kind at City work stations or premises is prohibited without the prior permission of the City Manager or an authorized departmental management official. ARTICLE 19 - PAYROLL DEDUCTION It is mutually agreed that the City will, during the term of this Agreement, deduct monies and remit to the Association (as authorized by Employee Payroll Deduction Authorization) a deduction for dues and insurance, providing there is not more than one such deduction per pay period. ARTICLE 20 - NO REDUCTION It is agreed that no member of the Association by virtue of the adoption of this Agreement shall suffer a reduction in working conditions and/or other benefits not otherwise enumerated in this Memorandum of Understanding: ARTICLE 21 - ACTING POSITIONS & SPECIAL DUTY PAY A Any employee a;cigned to perform the duties of a higher job clascification'shall 0 pay). B In addition to the permanent Fire Engineer position, any Firefighter or Firefighter/Paramedic covered by this agreement, who is assigned the duties and A Employees who are placed and maintain a position on a promotional eligibility list for the classifications of Fire Engineer and/or Fire Captain . shall receive a premium of 2% of base salary. When it is necessary to appoint an employee to Firefighters an acting position, that employee shall be chosen from the appropriate eligibility list for that classification. • C. Acting Pay shall be paid monthly. B. B. An employee covered by this agreement and assigned to perform any of the duties listed below shall receive an additional 5% above his Base Salary for each month so assigned. 1. Plan Check Officer Paramedic Coordinator Department Mechanic Reserve Firefighter Coordinator €. C. The City and Association mutually agree to meet, as the need may arise, to develop additional special Duties pay categories. ARTICLE 22 — PARAMEDIC REASSIGNMENT After a Paramedic has worked in the paramedic classification for a period of not less than five (5) consecutive years, he may return to the classification of Firefighter. The intended purpose is to provide the paramedic with the opportunity of reassignment. It is understood that in the event of such reassignment, the member will be placed at the step in the Firefighter base salary range corresponding to his step at the Paramedic salary range. This reduction will remain in effect until such time that the member either returns to paramedic duty or promotes to a higher rank within the Department. Additionally, the Fire Chief/ Public Safety Director has the authority to retain sufficient personnel, certified as a paramedic, to maintain the required level of service. When a vacancy occurs in the Paramedic classification, prior to any new entry level examination process, a promotional examination will be conducted with all current Firefighters, who meet the minimum requirements, eligible to participate in the examination process. ARTICLE 23 - MEDICAL EXAMS A. All employees covered" by this agreement shall be provided with a complete physical exam on a biennial schedule. Said physical to be at a location of the City's choice and at the City's expense. The physical exam is to include the following procedures as medically indicated: Physician systemic examination 7 Firefighters 2. Audiometry 3. Occult Blood 4. Comprehensive Blood Panel and Urinalysis 5. Exercise prescription/Physician Consultation Additional procedures such as tonometry, spirometry, chest x-ray, body composition analysis, resting 12 -lead electrocardiogram, maximal exercise stress test, oxygen uptake analysis, and strength and flexibility testing may be performed as medically appropriate. The City will maintain compliance with current laws and regulations regarding the release of medical records. ARTICLE 24 - EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH The City will provide to all employees covered by this agreement the equivalent of the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) that is in effect as of July 1, 1997. City will continue to provide the Psychological Health Plan that is in effect as of July.1, 1997 or its equivalent. ARTICLE 25 — EMPLOYEE OPTION BENEFIT PROGRAM Purpose To provide a benefit package which allows the individual firefighter to select benefits according to his/her.particular needs Amount of Benefit The amount of E.O.B.benefit is $603.28 monthly. At such time as the three party (family) premium exceeds $724.00 permonth, the E.O.B. benefit shall be increased by 55% of the increase in the cost of the Indemnity Medical Plan for coverage of the Employee plus dependents. Any increase in the E.O.B. Benefit is to be effective coincidental to the effective date of the Indemnity Medical Plan cost increase. Benefit Options Medical Insurance 1. The City is exploring the ability to offerhealth insurance through P.E.R.S. The City and the Association agree to meet to discuss funding of a 401(a)h)plan prior to its implementation. The plan to be implemented at no additional cost to the City. c. An employee entitled to his E.O.B. must either purchase medical insurance through the City or provide the City with proof of coverage for medical insurance by other means. Either the Indemnity or the HMO Medical insurance plan may be utilized. Dental Insurance Either the Indemnity of the HMO Dental plan may be utilized. Vision Insurance. Deferred Compensation. Cash Payment Bimonthly with regular paychecks ARTICLE 26 EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE In recognition of formal educational, vocational and technical training the City agrees to the following ' incentive program for all Fire Department employees covered by this MOU: 5%additional compensation over base salary Minimum Units 15 Years of Service 8 OR 10% additional compensation over base salary 30 45 AA/AS BA/BS 6 4 4 2 Minimum Units 30 Years of Service 12 In addition, employees are eligible to receive:. 1. 2% per month ( or a minimum of $100).per month for State Fire Officers (SFO) Certificate, and, notwithstanding the above; Firefighters 2% per month (or a minimum of $1001 per month for Emergency Medical Technician Certificate (EMT -1)*. EMT -1 Premium available for classifications other than Paramedic. Those persons in the classifications of Engineer and Captain who hold and maintain a current paramedic certification will receive a monthly incentive of 5% of top step paramedic salary. , Beginning January 1, 2001, the amount will be raised to 7.5% of the top step paramedic salary. Effective January 1, 2003, the monthly incentive shall be increased to 10% of top step paramedic pay. SFO and EMT -1 Certificate pay may be combined with academic premium above (i.e. 5% or 10%). Captains not eligible for. SFO premium. Retroactivity for payment of any of the above premiums -shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) months. E. The City will develop a program to reimburse Association members for approved job related training and course work. ARTICLE 27'- OVERTIME All employees covered by. this agreement who are required to perform in excess of the standard work period of 212 hours in a 28 day cycle shall receive compensation at the rate of time and one-half his/her regular rate of pay: The regular rate of pay shall include the following components in addition to Base salary: Educational Incentive Special Assignment Pay (i.e. Plan Check) Acting Pay All employees covered by this agreement who are required to perform less than 212 hours in a standard work period of 28 days, shall receive compensation at the straight time regular rate of pay, or compensatory time on an hour for hour basis. No employee covered by this agreement shall accrue more than one hundred forty four (144) hours of such compensatory time. Should any employee exceed one hundred forty four (144) hours of accrued compensatory time, he/she shall receive compensation at the straight time regular rate of pay. 10 Firefighters In determining an employee's eligibility for overtime compensation in a work period, paid leaves of absences and unpaid leaves of absences shall be excluded from the total hours worked. Paid leaves of absences include, but are not limited to, the following: Vacation Holiday Leave Sick Leave Administrative Leave Compensatory Leave Workers' Compensation Leave (4850 Time Jury Duty (compensated by the City) Bereavement Leave All extra time worked (commonly referred to as overtime) will be distributed as equally as possible among regular full time Association members within the classifications. All employees covered by this agreement forced to work in a lower classification. shall receive their regular rate of pay. No employee shall be required to work overtime until all available employees have been contacted. All, hours spent acquiring continuing education for the purpose of maintaining certification as a paramedic shall be considered hour worked for FLSA purposes. ARTICLE 28 OVERTIME AUTHORIZATION All overtime requests must have prior written authorization of the Fire Chief (or his designee) prior to the commencement of, such overtime work. where prior written •authorization is not feasible, explicit verbal authorization must be obtained. Where verbal authorization is obtained, written authorization must be obtained as soon as thereafter practicable. Dispatched calls beyond the end of duty time are considered as authorized. An employee's failure to obtain prior written approval, or explicit verbal. authorization followed by written authorization, will result in the denial of the overtime request Firefighters ARTICLE 29 - SHIFT TRADES The practice of shift trading shall be voluntary on behalf of each employee involved in the trade. B. A member desiring a shift trade (exchange) shall: 1. Prepare and submit with proper signatures a "shift exchange form" to his supervisor. Exchange shifts with members of equal rank or classification, or members that can be assigned to perform in an acting capacity (non -compensated), or can perform the same duties as the requester. Make sure the exchange is approved by the proper supervisor(s) before the trade occurs: The trade must be due to the employee's desire or need to attend to a personal matter and not due to the department's operations. Shift trades are not to be used in lieu of accrued vacation and/or comp. time. More than three consecutive shift trades requested will be approved only when accompanied by a valid, justification (i.e. educational commitments, use of required yearly vacation already taken, manning shortages, or cancellation of other time off by the Department). The employee providing the trade shall not have his/her compensable hours increased as a result of the trade, nor shall the employee receiving the trade have his compensable hours decreased as a result of the trade. ' Any hours worked beyond the normal work day will be credited to the individual actually doing the work. Once approved, shift trade dates and/or repayment dates may not be changed unless circumstances justify the change and must be submitted in writing to the requesters Captain for approval. "Paybacks" of shift trades are the obligation of the two employees involved in the trade. Paybacks are to be completed within one (1) year of the date of the initial shift trade Any dispute as to paybacks is to be resolved by the involved em- ployees, and under no circumstances will the department be obligated for any further compensation whatsoever to any of the involved employees. The department is not responsible in any manner for hours owed to employees by other employees that leave the employment of the City or are assigned other duties. 12 Firefighters A record of all initial shift trades and "paybacks" shall be maintained by the Fire Captains. If one individual fails to appear for the other .(regardless of the reason), the person who traded in to the schedule will be listed as absent without leave and may be subject to disciplinary action. ARTICLE 30 - EARLY RELIEF POLICY The practice of, early shift relief shall be voluntary on behalf of each employee involved in the -relief. The employee providing the early relief shall not have his/her compensable hours increased as a result of the early relief nor shall the employee relieved early have his/her compensable hours decreased as a result of the early relief. "Paybacks" of early relief hours are the sole obligation of the two employees involved in the early relief. Any dispute is to be resolved by the involved employees, and under no circumstances will the department be obligated for any further compensation whatsoever to any of the involved employees. The department is not responsible in any manner for hours owed to employees by other employees that leave the employment of the City or are assigned to other duties. ARTICLE 31 — TRAINING TIME Attendance at training schools/facilities (including the Academy) which improves the performance of regular tasks and/or prepares for job advancement are not compensable for hours in excess of the employee's normal work shift. Any time spent in excess of the normal work shift will not be counted as working time and is not compensable in any manner whatsoever. Time spent in studying and other personal pursuits is not compensable hours of work, even though the employee may be confined to campus or to barracks 24 hours a day. This provision is not intended to waive any employee's rights for purposes of Workers' Compensation benefits. Training mandated by the Department on an employee's day off shall be compensated for actual time spent in training. Travel time to and from the training facility outside of an employee's normal work shift is not normally compensable hours of work, however, reasonable requests for travel time shall be adjusted between the ` Department Head and the Employee. Nothing in this article is intended to waive the employee's rights for purposes of Workers' Compensation benefits. ARTICLE 32 — CITY VEHICLE USE Employees who are provided with a City vehicle to travel to and from work shall not be compensated in any manner whatsoever for such travel time in the City vehicle [this Firefighters provision also applies in those situations where the , radio must be . left on monitored]. and ARTICLE 33 - COURT PAY When an employee covered by this agreement is physically called to court on a regularly scheduled day off, he/she shall be credited with a minimum of three (3) hours worked or on an hour for hour basis for the time actually spent in court., whichever is greater, compensated at one and one half times of the regular rate of pay. Travel time shall not be considered hours worked and shall not be compensated.in any'manner whatsoever. This provision is not intended to waive the employee's rights for purposes of. Workers' Compensation benefits. ARTICLE 34 - COURT STANDBY PAY An employee who while off duty is on court standby status may leave a telephone number at a location within forty-five (45) minutes of the designated court where he/she may be reached while on court standby. Such time is not considered hours worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The employee will receive straight time pay, up to a maximum of 8.5 hours per day, for standby during the pendency of the case: Alternatively, an employee on court standby shall report, with the permission of the Department, to the Fire facility, in uniform, for assignment while awaiting court. An employee shall be credited on an hour for hour basis, compensated at one and one. half times the regular rate of pay, for time actually worked while on standby. Travel time to the Fire facility shall not be considered hours worked and shall not be compensated in any manner whatsoever. ARTICLE 35 - CALL 'BACK Call back duty occurs when an employee is ordered to return to duty on a non regularly scheduled work shift. Call back does not occur when an employee is held over from his/her regularly scheduled shift. An employee called back to duty shall be credited with a minimum of five (5) hours work commencing when he/she reports to duty. Any hours worked in excess of five (5) hours shall be credited on an hour for hour basis for actual time worked. Travel time shall not be considered hours worked and shall not be compensated in any manner whatsoever; An employee who is held over at the end of his/her shift for an emergency shall be credited with a minimum of two (2) hours work. ARTICLE 36 - PAID VACATIONS Employees covered by. this agreement shall receive, paid annual vacations pursuant to the terms of this Article. Vacation requests will be made by employees as far in advance as possible in order to insure time off as required. All Association members within the classification shall have the first week after the list is posted on the board to fill the openings. All other personnel may sign for any open shifts after the first week. If any shift remains open after the second week, the Fire Chief, or his designee, may require department personnel to fill them. The parties agree that a list be kept of overtime for vacation, holiday, sick leave, and emergency. Paid vacations to be as follows: Upon Hire Commencing with the Third Year Commencing with the Sixth year Commencing with the Tenth year Commencing with the Fifteenth Year Commencing with the Nineteenth year shifts/year shifts/year shifts/year shifts/year 11 shifts/year 12 shifts/year All employees shall take vacation time off within each fiscal year. An employee may accrue vacation to a maximum of 15 shifts (360 hrs). Cash out of any earned but unused vacation accrual in excess of 360 hrs. shall be automatically cashed out as part of the June 30th payroll Cash -out of excess vacation accrual shall be at the employees regular rate of pay. Additionally, upon utilization of vacation, an employee covered by this agreement may cash in vacation on a one for one basis up to a maximum of six (6) shifts per year. Cash -in of Vacation accrual shall be at the employees' regular rate of pay In the event that an employee desires to accumulate vacation time from year to year, the employee may do so providing permission has been received from the City Manager; City Manager shall not unreasonably withhold such permission. Requests for vacation time of more than three (3) shifts must be submitted to the Fire Chief or his designee, at least three (3) shifts in advance. 15 Firefighters ARTICLE 37 HOLIDAYS At the employees option, all employees who are covered by this agreement will receive, in lieu of holiday time off, twelve (12) hours of pay per month at the employees regular rate of pay, or twelve hours per month of compensatory time off. Requests for Holiday Comp time off of more than three (3) shifts shall be submitted to the Captain at least three (3) shifts in advance. Only one (1) Captain and one (1) Engineer may be off at the same time. There shall be an accrual cap of 480 hours, all hours in excess of this maximum shall be automatically cashed out as part of the. June 30th payroll. Said cash out to be at the employee's regular rate of pay. Unless otherwise provided for in this Agreement,upon termination of City service for any reason accrued Holiday Comp shall be cashed out at the employee's regular rate of pay. ARTICLE 38 — SICK LEAVE All Association Members shall accrue twelve (12) hours per month sick leave (6 shifts per year). All employees with a minimum sick leave balance of 242 hours MAY annually cash in up tofour hundred (400) hours of sick leave per year in excess of 242 hours. The annual date and number of hours shall be the employee's 'choice. Said cash out will be at the employee's regular rate of pay. Employees hired prior to July 1, 1989 shall have an accrual cap of 2000 hours. All hours in excess of this maximum shall be automatically cashed out as part of the June 30th payroll at employees' regular rate of pay. Employees whose accrual balance exceeds 2000 hours as of July 1, 1989 shall be allowed to maintain that balance: Employees hired July 1, 1989 or later shall have an accrual cap of 1200 hrs. All hours in excess of this maximum shall be automatically cashed out as part of the June 30th payroll at employees regular rate of pay. ARTICLE 39 — REGULATION OF SICK LEAVE & OTHER PROVISIONS Use of Sick Leave Sick leave shall be used only in case of sickness or disability of the employee or for family sick leave. Misuse of sick leave shall be grounds for disciplinary action. 16 Firefighters 1. To receive compensation while absent on sick leave, employees shall notify the City per the Department's sick leave policy. When absence is for more than two (2) consecutive shifts the City may request the reason for the absencebe verified by a written statement, stating the cause of absence, from an attending physician. The employee shall furnish any other proof of sickness reasonably required by the City. Family Sick Leave In case of serious illness or death of a member of the immediate family, the employee may utilize sick leave. Pregnancy (maternity or paternity) is an allowable use. Immediate family for the purpose of this Section shall be defined as: spouse, mother, mother-in-law, father, father-in-law, sister, brother, (step)child or guardian, stepfather, stepmother, grandparents or grandchildren. Employees may pre -designate and substitute other members for those members defined as "immediate family:" The intent of this provision is not to expand the number of persons included in the definition of "immediate family" or to increase the paid leave opportunities, but, rather to recognize the variation in family structure (e.g. aunt for mother in the case where it as an aunt as caretaker in the absence of a mother). Such time shall be deducted from the existing sick leave of the employee. ARTICLE 40 - SICK LEAVE AT TERMINATION For employees hired prior to July 1, 1989 and upon termination, either voluntary/involuntary or resignation from City employment, sick leave will be paid, at the employees regular rate of pay, according to the following standards 25% of all accrued sick leave for 5 through 9 years continuous service. 50% of all accrued sick leave for 10 through 19 years continuous service. 75% of all accrued sick leave for 20 plus years continuous service (exception: for medical retirement at age 50+ with 20 years or more of continuous service, cash -out shall be at employees' forty -hour rate). 17 Firefighters Upon service retirement, accrued sick leave shall be cashed out pursuant to the schedule above computed at the employees forty -hour rate of pay. C. For employees hired July 1, 1989 or later and upon termination, resignation, or service retirement, from City employment, sick leave shall be paid at the employees' regular rate of pay, according to the following standards, 1. 50% of all accrued sick leave for 10 or more years of continuous service. D. in exception to A, B & C above employees covered by this agreement who are retired as a result of a service connected disability shall receive 75% of their accumulated sick hours regardless of length of service. Said cash -out shall be at the employee's regular rate of pay. ARTICLE 41 - BEREAVEMENT LEAVE Each employee covered by this Agreement shall receive a maximum of two shifts per calendar year to be utilized for bereavement leave because of a death in their immediate family. Immediate family shall be defined as in Article 40 of the Agreement. Said time will not be cumulative from one twelve month period to another nor will pay in lieu of unused bereavement be provided. The Chief may grant one (1) additional shift in the event or a death which requires extended travel. ARTICLE 42 — RETIREMENT Employees covered by this Agreement shall be provided with the California Public Retirement System, 2% at 50 Plan with section 20024.2, - One year final compensation (twelve highest paid consecutive months) included. City shall pay the employee 9% contribution. Beginning January 1, 2001, the City will provide the PERS 3% @ 55 retirement plan. Any savings 'resulting from a reduction in the City's rate during initial sign-up for the 3% 55 benefit will be redistributed towards a general salary increase. The City shall report to P.E.R.S. the value of the 9% employer paid member contribution (EPMC) pursuant to the authority of Government Code section 20023(c)(4). For employees hired prior to July 1, 1989, upon service retirement, the employees accumulated holiday comp. and vacation accrual accounts shall be' cashed out at the employees forty (40) hour equivalent rate of pay. (i.e. utilizing sick, vacation and/or comp time). D. Employees who retire after July 18, 2000 shall be eligible for a medical insurance premium supplement. Said supplement shall be in the following amount: 18 Firefighters 1. For service retirement at aqe fifty (50), or disability retirement (no age restriction) with a minimum of ten (10) years of service with the City of Hermosa Beach said supplement shall be $100 per month. Effective July 1, 2001, this amount will be increased to $150 per month. 2 For service retirement at age fifty (50), or disability retirement (no aqe restriction) with a minimum of twenty (20) years of service with the City of Hermosa Beach said supplement shall be $125 per month. Effective July 1, 2001, this amount shall be increased to $200 per month. ARTICLE 43 - UNIFORM ALLOWANCE All permanent personnel covered by this Agreement shall be authorized . a yearly maintenance and replacement uniform allowance As follows: Effective 7/1/97 $360/year 7/1/98 $420/year 7/1/99 $480/year ARTICLE 44 - LIFE INSURANCE All employees covered by the Agreement to be provided Life Insurance in the amount of $70,000 at City expense. ARTICLE 45 - SALARYCONTINUANCE All employees covered by this Agreement shall be required to be covered under the LTD plan. An employee utilizing the LTD plan shall accrue vacation, sick leave, holiday comp. and allowances only during that period of their leave that they are receiving pay (i.e. utilizing sick, vacation and /or comp time). ARTICLE 46 —SELECTION OF 100 DOCTOR OR FACILITY It is understood that the City will provide medical facilities to be used for industrial accidents or illness. However, in the event that the Association members covered by the MOU wish to grieve the City's selection, the City will give due consideration to the facts presented and select a new facility based on all facts presented if necessary. This provision in no manner is intended to waive or abrogate employees Workers' Compensation rights under the under the California Labor Code. 19 • Firefighters ARTICLE 47 CONSTANT MANNING The term "constant manning" refers to procedures established to ensure that fire suppression staffing levels are maintained at a predetermined number of personnel. A predetermined number of personnel is established by the number of currently authorized Fire Department positions and by the organizational assignment of personnel. The Association and the City agree that for and during the term of this agreement the established staffing level shall be a minimum of five (5) persons per shift and an agreed upon goal of six (6) per shift. City and Association agree to meet and confer should the financial position of the City improve to the extent that would allow a return to a minimum staffing of six (6) per shift. ARTICLE 48 - PROBATIONARY PERIOD Original and promotional appointments to the. Fire Department shall serve a probationary period of twelve (12) months. Probationary periods may be extended for a period not to exceed six (6) months. ARTICLE 49 - WORK STOPPAGE PROHIBITION Prohibited Conduct: The Association, its officers, agents, representatives, and members, agree that, during the term if this Memorandum of Understanding or any agreed upon extensions of the MOU, they will not call or engage in any strike, walkout, work stoppage, sick-out, blue flu, concerted withholding of services by employees represented by the Association, disruption of City services, or honor any job action by any other employee or group action by any other employee or group ofemployeesof the, City or any union or association of employees by withholding or refusing to perform services; provided, however, that by executing this agreement, neither the. Association nor any of its members waive their rights (1) under Section 6300 et. seq. of the California Labor Code to refuse to work under unsafe conditions and (2) under the United States and California Constitutions to exercise their rights of freedom of speech, assembly, and association such as by engaging in unlawful informational picketing. In the event that the Association, its officers, agents, representatives, or members engage in any of the conduct prohibited above, the Association shall immediately instruct, in writing, any persons, engaging in such conduct that their actions are in violation of this Memorandum of Understanding and are unlawful, and that they must immediately cease such conduct and return to work. 20 Firefighters 3. ' In the event that the Association carries out ` in good faith its responsibilities set forth in Paragraph 2 above, it shall not be liable for the actions of any individual who participates in conduct prohibited by Paragraph I above. Any employee who participates in any conduct prohibited above and violates any other City Rule or Regulation, shall be subject to disciplinary action including termination by the City. This shall not abrogate the right of any employee to receive all due process guaranteed to him or her in procedures relating to disciplinary action. ARTICLE 50 — AUXILIARY FIREFIGHTERS No member of the auxiliary/reserve/paid call firefighters or other such volunteer program firefighters will be used to replace regular employees in the Fire Department in overtime situations. However, in the event there are no regular, full-time firefighters available, the City, upon notification to the Association, and approved by same, may use auxiliary/reserve/paid call personnel in overtime situations in order to maintain the proper minimum manning level. ARTICLE 51 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES Purpose of Grievance Procedures: To promote improved employer-employee relations by establishing procedures on matters. To provide that grievances shall be settled as near as possible to the point of origin. To provide that the grievance procedures shall be as informal as possible. A "Grievance shall be defined as a controversy between the City and the Association or an employee or employees covered by this Agreement. Such controversy must pertain to any of the following: Any matter involving the application of any provision of this Agreement; or Any matter involving the violations of any provision of intent of this Agreement; or Any matter that affects the working conditions of the employee or the application of all rules, regulations, policies and/or laws affecting the employees covered by this Agreement. Disciplinary actions shall not be appealed under the provisions. of this, section. 21 Firefighters There shall be earnest effort on, the part of both parties to settle grievances promptly through the steps listed below.. STEP 1. An employee's Grievance must be submitted in writing by the employee, fully stating the facts surrounding the Grievance and detailing the specific provisions of this Agreement alleged to have been violated, signed, and dated by the. employee and presented to his first line supervisor immediately in charge of the aggrieved employee within fifteen (15) calendar days after the event giving rise to the Grievance or fifteen (15) calendar days after he could have been reasonably expected to have had knowledge. The supervisor will give his answer to the employee by the end of the tenth (10) calendar day following the presentation of the grievance and the giving of such answer will terminate Step 1. STEP 2. If the grievance is not settled in Step 1, the grievance will be presented to the Fire Chief (or in the case where the Fire Chief responded at step 1, to the City Manager, or his designee) within ten (10) calendar days after termination of Step 1. A meeting with the employee, Association Officer, and Fire Chief (or City Manager or his designee), will be arranged at a mutually agreeable location and time to review and discuss the grievance. Such meeting will take place within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date the grievance is received by the Fire ',Chief (or City Manager/ designee). The Chief (City Manager/designee) may invite other members of management to be present at such meeting, The Chief (City Manager/designee) will give a written reply by the end of the tenth (10) calendar day following the date of the meeting, and the giving of such reply will terminate Step 2. STEP 3. If the grievance is not settled in Step 2, .the. Association Representative shall, within seven (7) calendar days after the termination of Step 2, arrange for a meeting with the City Manager to be held at a mutually agreeable location and time to review and discuss the grievance. Suchmeeting will take place within ten (10) calendar days from the date of the grievance is referred to Step 3. A decision shall be rendered within ten (10) calendar days from the date of such meeting. The decision shall be in writing. E. Time limits as set forth above may be extended by mutual agreement between the parties but neither party shall be required to do so. 22 Firefighters In the event that the Association >calls witnesses that must be excused from work, the City agrees to excuse same in paid status. The parties agree that in the event the member or the Association fail to comply with the time limits contained herein, such failure constitutes a waiver of right to prosecute the grievance; it is further agreed that in the event the City or its representatives fail to comply with the prescribed time limits, such ; failure constitutes an agreement to concur with the grievant's position and remedy. It is not intended that the grievance procedure be used to, effect changes in the established salary and fringe benefits. ARTICLE 52 ARBITRATION Grievances which are not settled pursuant to the grievance procedure herein and which either party desires to contest further, shall be submitted to arbitration as provided in this Article provided however, that said request for Arbitration shall be made within twenty (20) days of the conclusion of Step 3 of the Grievance procedure. As soon as possible and in any event not later then fourteen (14) calendar days after either party received written notice from the other of the desire to arbitrate, the parties shall agree upon an arbitrator. Ifno agreement is reached within said fourteen (14) calendar days, an arbitrator shall be selected from a list of seven (7) arbitrators submitted by the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service by alternate striking of names until one name remains. The, party who strikes the 'first name from the panel shall be determined by lot. Either. the City or the Association may call any employee as a witness, and the employer agrees to release said witness from work if he is on duty. If ,an employee witnessis called by the City, the City will reimburse him for time lost; if called by the Association, the Association The arbitrator shall have no power to alter, amend, change, add to, or subtract from any of the terms of this Agreement. The decision of the arbitrator shall be based solely upon evidence and arguments presented to him by the respective parties in the presence of each other. Thedecision of the arbitrator within the limits herein prescribed shall be final and binding upon the parties in dispute. The mutual decision of the parties and/or the arbitrator in any dispute shall be the final and binding decision on all parties and there shall not be any appeal to another board, authority, commission and/or agency for it is the intent of this Agreement to supplant the Civil Service (Personnel. Board) hearing and appeal system with the provisions of this Agreement. 23 Firefighters The Arbitrator may hear and determine only one grievance at a time without the expressed agreement of the City and the Association. The parties shall share equally the expense of the cost of the arbitration, with the exception of counsel's fees. ARTICLE 53 PRODUCTIVITY The City and the Association mutually agree to continually seek means of increasing productivity in the Fire service. ARTICLE 54 — COMPENSATION Methods of compensation: Compensation shall be determined on an hourly basis. Payments due shall be paid on a bimonthly basis unless otherwise mutually agreed. By mutual consent early payments and other modifications can be made. Base hourly salary shall be considered at the regular rate of pay for a particular classification without consideration of any other form of compensation Noemployees may take time off from normal working hours for the purpose of depositing a paycheck. Employees are encouraged to utilize the City's ability to "Direct Deposit" paychecks to the bank or credit union of the employees choice. Salary Advancements Within Base Pay Range Salary ranges are established to provide fair compensation to each classification. Initial appointment shall be made at the minimum step within a particular range, but the City Manager may approve a higher starting step. Step Advancement: 1. All salary advancement shall be based on merit and fitness. All increases shall be recommended by the Department Head and approved by the Personnel Director. Merit increases shall be effective at the beginning of the next pay period, following the effective date (1st or 16th of the month). 24 Firefighters Promotion: An employee who is promoted to a position in a class with a higher salary rate shall be entitled to the lowest step in the higher range which exceeds the present rate of pay with the intent of increasing the base salary by at least 5.0%. ARTICLE 55 - BASE MONTHLY SALARY The Base, Monthly Salary for the classifications indicated shall be: 1 2 3 4 5 6 CAPTAIN 4605 4836 5079 5332 5598 5878 ENGINEER 3852 4045 4247 4460 4682 4916 PARAMEDIC 3772 3910 4104 4310 4525 4750 4916 FIREFIGHTER 3219 3380 3548 3727 3913 4108 1. Retroactivity applies only to persons actively employed on the date this agreement is approved by the City Council 2. Effective July 1, 1998 Bac Monthly Salary shall be increased 3%. 3. Effective July 1, 1999 Base Monthly Salary shall be increased 3%. the classification of paramedic equal to top step of the engineer ciassif+cation. Effective January 1, 2001, the base monthly salaries for : Firefighter, Firefighter/Paramedic and Fire Engineer shall be increased 3.5%. For the position of Fire Captain, the salary shall be increased 4.5%. Effective July 1, 2001, the base monthly salaries for Firefighter, Firefighter/Paramedic and Fire Engineer shall be increased 3%. For the position of Fire Captain, the salary shall be increased 4%. Effective July 1, 2002, the base monthly salaries for Firefighter, Firefighter/Paramedic and Fire Engineer shall be increased position of Fire Captain, the salary shall be increased 6%. Initial Appointment For entry Firefighter the initial appointment shall be at Step A. Upon completion of the Fire Academy, advance to Step B. Upon successful by 5%. For the 25 Firefighters completion of probation, advance to Step C. All additional step increases shall be at yearly intervals based upon merit. For entry Paramedic the initial appointment shall be at Step A. Upon completion of the Fire°Academy, Step B. Upon successful completion of probation, advance to Step C. Additional step increases at yearly intervals based upon merit except, for initial hire employees, final step based on merit and minimum three years in Paramedic Classification. Promotional Paramedic appointments shall be eligible for "F" step following twelve (12) months at the "E" step OR upon completion of probation whichever is greater. Additional step increases to be considered upon completion of one ywr in step EXCEPT advancement to Stcp F basedupon merit and completion of two ycrs service as engineer. ARTICLE 56 - PERFORMANCE REVIEW Upon completion of probation, each employee shall thereafter be reviewed annually; said review to be constructive in nature and designed to point out areas of both strength and weakness, methods of improvement, etc. ARTICLE 57 - PHYSICAL FITNESS PROGRAM Effective July 1, 1989, the City and Association adopt a Physical Fitness Policy. and Incentive Program as described in the attached Exhibit A. Fitness evaluations shall be conducted biannually during the months of October and May. Monetary payments shall be made in accordance with the provisions of section 704.09 of the Incentive Program: Association members who wish to participate- in the. Physical Fitness Incentive Program shall be allowed two (2) hours during their shift (including prep and clean-up) to participate in physical fitness activities. Members must complete each of the fitness components to be eligible for the incentive payment. CITY and ASSOCIATION agree to meet and confer during the term of this agreement regarding modification to the fitness, measurement and scoring components of the Program. No modification to the program shall be effective unless approved in writing by both CITY and ASSOCIATION. 26 Firefighters ARTICLE 58 —LAYOFF The City and the Association acknowledge Section 2-76.200 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, as currently enacted, as the governing provision regarding layoff. However, the City and the Association further agree that, prior to implementation of any such layoff, discussions shall be held to explore other alternatives, mitigation's, etc. ARTICLE 59 - EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS SESSIONS In the interest of fostering and continuing a spirit and atmosphere of harmonious employer-employee relationships, it is agreed that the Association Board of Directors shall meet quarterly with the Fire Chief and biannually with the City Manager; there shall be no less than two (2) Board members present for each such meeting. ARTICLE 60 JURY DUTY service to persons who do not receive jury duty pay from thcir employer (so as to. reinstated. Employees are not prohibited from using paid vacation or compensatory If called for Jury Duty in a Municipal, Superior, or Federal Court, or for a Coroner's Jury, employees covered by this Agreement shall remain in their regular pay status. All jury fees, except mileage reimbursement shall be returned to the City. ARTICLE 61 — LONGEVITY PAY Upon completion of the 20th year of City service, employees shall receive a longevity premium of 5% of base monthly pay. ARTICLE 62 — MILITARY LEAVE Pursuant to governing State and Federal law, employees covered by this Agreement will be granted Military Leave; said leave to be without City pay. 27 ARTICLE 63 - DISCIPLINE, SUSPENSION, DISCHARGE City and Association understand the value of progressive discipline. City will therefore endeavor to incorporate that procedure in it's disciplinary policy. In that regard, City will endeavor to adhere to the following guideline re implementing progressive disciplinary procedures: 1. Verbal warnings) which are to be formally logged; 2. Written reprimand(s); 3. Suspension(s); 4. Demotion/Reduction in pay; Termination ARTICLE 64 — APPEAL OF DISCIPLINE Verbal warnings may not be appealed. In the case of a written reprimand, the employee reprimanded may request the issuer's immediate superior to review the action. Said request shall be made within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the action. Suspension, Demotion, Reduction -in -Pay, and Termination: Step I. Following notice of intent of disciplinary action, a meeting between the Fire Chief, other management representatives, the affected employee and representatives of his choice, may be held within ten (10) calendar days to discuss the discipline. Following that meeting, the Fire Chief will issue a ruling within seven (7) calendar days and may uphold, modify, reduce or rescind the proposed disciplinary action. Any proposed disciplinary action shall be initiated following the conclusion of Step I. The issuance of the Chief's ruling shall conclude Step I. If the matter is not resolved at Step I, the employee maywithin seven (7) calendar days file a written appeal with the City Manager. The City Manager (or his designee) shall arrange a meeting with the employee and his representative to be held within ten (10) calendar days from the date the appeal is received. The City Manager may invite other members of the management team to be present at that meeting. Following the meeting the City Manager (or his designee) shall render a decision within ten (10) calendar days. The issuance of the decision concludes Step II. 28 Firefighters Step III If the matter is not .resolved at Step II, the employee may, within ten (10) calendar days of the conclusion of Step II, request a hearing pursuant to Section 2.76.160/2.76.180 of the Hermosa Beach City Code. Such request shall be delivered in writing to the Personnel Director Officer. Time limits as set forth above for each of the steps may be extended by mutual agreement between the parties, but neither party shall be required to so agree. ARTICLE 65 - EXIGENCY Notwithstanding the terms described in this MOU, the parties acknowledge the obligation of the City Council to insure the financial integrity of City Government. Accordingly, Association agrees to meet and confer upon request of the City to discuss MOU modifications should: New State or Local Initiatives(s), New Federal mandate(s), or State or Federal Judicial ruling(s) be implemented whereby said action increases City's MOU costs or otherwise' precludes operation of any portion of this MOU. It is acknowledgedthat no such MOU changecan occur without acceptance by City and Association. ARTICLE 66 WAIVER OF BARGAINING The Parties acknowledge that during the negotiation which resulted in this agreement, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any subject or matter appropriate for collective bargaining and that the understandings and agreements arrived at by the Parties after the exercise of that right and opportunity are set forth in this Agreement. Therefore, the Parties of this Agreement concur that the other shall not be obligated to bargain collectively with respect to any subject or matter without mutual consent even though such subjects or matters may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both of the Parties at the time that they negotiated or signed this Agreement. 29 Firefighters ARTICLE 67 PROVISION EFFECTIVE The provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding shall be effective commencing July 18, 2000, and shall govern until June 30, 2003. ARTICLE 68 - EXECUTION This Memorandum of Understanding represents the full and complete understanding between the parties related to the subject matter set forth herein and all preliminary negotiations of whatever kind or nature are merged herein. The . parties hereto have caused this Memorandum'of Understanding to be executed this day of 2000. Hermosa Beach Fire Association City. of Hermosa Beach James Crawford Stephen Burrell Mark Klein Viki Copeland Michael Garofano Michael Earl 30 Firefighters August 3, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council i RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY PROSECUTOR SERVICES Recommendation: That the City Council approve rate increase from $6320 to $6560 per month. Background: The City has contracted for City Prosecutor services for a number of years. The present City Prosecutor has provided services to the City under contract since 1991. The City Prosecutor continues to provide good service to the City. This arrangement continues to be a good way to provide this service. To a large extent, the costs of the prosecutions are recouped through fines paid by those prosecutions. The City Prosecutor also works well with the Police Department which effectively reduces our costs for overtime when police officers are required to appear. The proposed rate increase is from $6320 to $6560 per month for 80 hours of service. This works out to $82.00 per hour. This rate is competitive with rates charged other cities having similar services. The annual cost impact will be $2880. 'I have discussed the proposal with the Police Chief, who provides the direct supervision, and he agrees that we are receiving very good service from the City Prosecutor. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES WITH Kenneth A. Meersand Attorney at Law THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 1st day of July, 2000, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and Kenneth A. Meersand, (hereinafter referred to as "Prosecutor"). WHEREAS, the City desires to engage Prosecutor to render legal services, advice, and assistance in connection with City's enforcement activities. NOW, THEREFORE; THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE TO FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICE Reporting to and under the general direction of the City Manager, the City Prosecutor is responsible for the prosecution of violations of the municipal code and misdemeanor and infraction violations of the Penal Code for the City. Prosecutor agrees to render legal services to the City and City Prosecutor pursuant to the terms herein and when and as required by the City Manager: For the monthly retainer specified herein, Prosecutor will provide up to 80 hours of legal services per month which may include, but shall not be limited to: Meeting with the various departments and staff entrusted with the enforcement of the various legal codes concerning violations, enforcement, and prosecutions during regular office hours each week; * Review all of misdemeanor, infraction, and municipal code violations; * Filing and/or coordinating filing of all criminal complaints (Infraction and Misdemeanor); * Complete all legal procedures for prosecution through the municipal court system making all court appearances in connection with prosecutions including arraignment, pretrial appearances, motions, and trials (jury and court); * Representing the City in traffic court as required; * Filing answers and assisting the departments with Pitchess and discovery motions, making court appearances and attending in camera hearings as needed; * Assisting with legal filings for asset forfeitures in connection with illegal narcotics activity; * Preparing necessary documents to include motions and orders in conjunction with evidence and seized property releases and destruction, marking court appearances as necessary; * Developing and presenting in-service training programs and legal updates to personnel involved in the enforcement of the various codes and laws as needed * Providinglegal support and advice on sensitive investigations; * Developing and maintaining programs and procedures to effectively track prosecutions and report statistical data on case loads and case dispositions on a monthly basis to the Police Chief; * Being available on an on call basis to respond to crime scene locations and to assist the. departments in the preparation and attainment of search warrants, arrest warrants, bail deviations and other legal matters as needed. 2. COMPENSATION For the services specified in this Agreement, the City shall pay Prosecutor a monthly retainer in the amount of $6,560, and provide City paid premium, employee only rate, for medical, dental and vision coverage. For all legal, services in excess of 80, hours per month, Prosecutor shall be compensated for services rendered under this Agreement at the hourly rate of $82.00. City shall reimburse Prosecutor for reasonable expenses incurred in an amount equal to actual out-of-pocket costs such as reproduction, messenger services, filing costs, witness fees, jury fees, court reporter fees, professional newsletters and memberships, attendanceat meetings and seminars as approved by the City Manager, and similar costs relating to prosecution of City cases. All expenses shall be submitted with appropriate receipts. Prosecutor shall not be reimbursed for secretarial or typist services or normal office operating expenses. Fees listed herein shall be subject to review and adjustment during the regular City budget processes each year. 3. METHOD OF PAYMENT Within ten (10) days after the first of each calendar month, Prosecutor shall submit a statement to the City, attention: City Manager, containing a breakdown of services performed during the preceding month specifying the services performed by dates and number of hours, and itemization of other expenses related thereto. Prosecutor agrees to modify and/or add to billing statement at City's request to show cumulative totals and improve clarity. 4. STATUS OF CITY PROSECUTOR The City Prosecutor is an independent contractor and not an officer, administrator, or employee of the City. The City shall not be liable, responsible, or otherwise answer for any claims for damages or other relief against Prosecutor based on any undertaking not authorized or directed by the City. 5. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Prosecutor shall serve at the pleasure of the City and this Agreement may be terminated by either party on ninety (90) days written notice to the other, the effective date of cancellation being the 90th day of said written notice without further action by either party. Notice shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or as of the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: CITY: City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254, PROSECUTOR: Kenneth A. Meersand 1219 Morningside Drive Manhattan Beach, California 90266 6. SEVERABILITY If any provision or portion of this Agreement is held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable, then the remainder of this Agreement or portions, thereof shall be deemed severable, shall not be affected, and shall remain, in full force and effect. The text herein shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Prosecutor have executed this. Agreement as of the date first hereinabove set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY PROSECUTOR Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager Kenneth A. Meersand Approved as to form: City Attorney Mayor and Members of the City Council NOTICE OF NEED TO AMEND CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to: 1) appropriately amend the City's Conflict of Interest Code, ensuring it is accurate and up to date, and 2) submit the amended Code to Council for final approval within 90 days, pursuant to State law. August 3, 2000 City Council Meeting August 8, 2000 Background: Every government agency is required by State law to adopt and promulgate a conflict of interest code, which is a document that designates the positions within an agency which make or participate in making governmental decisions that may foreseeably have a material effect on any financial interest. A conflict of interest code adopted pursuant to the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.) consists of two basic parts: 1) the body of the code which contains the basic provisions required by Section 87302, such as the manner of reporting financial interests, the procedure for filing statements of economic interests, and the method to be used by designated positions when they are required to disqualify themselves from participating in decisions; and the appendix of the code which lists the designated positions within the agency and the corresponding disclosure categories for each position. The Political Reform Act further requires every local government agency to review its conflict of interest code biennially to determine if it is accurate and up to date or if it must be amended; Once the determination has been made, a notice must be submitted by the October 1 deadline to the code_ reviewing body which, for the City, is the City Council. As required by law, the City Clerk has reviewed the City's existing Conflict of Interest Code, which was last updated and adopted October 27, 1998 (City Council Resolution No. 98-5938), and has determined that the current Code is no longer accurate and up to date and, therefore, does require amendment at this time, due to changes within the City's organizational structure which have occurred during the past two years, including the addition of a Public Works Commission, a Fire Battalion Chief, and new staff positions in the Public Works Department. An amended Code will be submitted to Council for approval within 90 days of this notice. Elaine Doerfling, August 3, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 AMENDMENT TO ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH GILLIS AND ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,300 FOR REVISIONS TO CITY HALL RENOVATIONS PROJECT Recommendation: That the City Council approve an amendment to the subject services contract in the amount of $5,300 to revise the plans and specifications to delete the work on the fire and police offices. Background: Staff has met with the architectural firm that prepared the plans and outlined the changes necessary to separate the work on this long process to renovate the offices and council chambers. They will be able to complete this work in about 2 to 3 weeks and we will be ready to go out to bid again. The changes pick up some of the comments that we received from bidders the first time around to remove any confusion that we were made aware of on the plans. My goal is to have this out to bid in September and back before City Council for award of bid in October. Jul -31-00 08:42A Gilli^ & ,ii ILLIS ASSOCIATES A It i' li i' < t: ! 31 JUL 00 Saul Blumenthal City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach CA Re: Revisions to the Drawings and Specifications for the City Hall Renovations Saul, per our discussions, we are proposing to revise the above drawings and specs to eliminate from the drawings (portions) any renovations to the Fire Station. mien Y....$ Strviee We estimate our work to perform the above to be as follows: Don Gillis Kent Kleuter 8Hrs © 100.00 $800 60 Hrs @ 75.00 $4,500 If our services are requested for answering questions posed during bidding, generating addenda, etc., we will bill our work hourly at Kent's rate of $75.00/Hr. We assume that all printing will be done by the City as before. Should the project go forward through construction, we can discuss your desire for our involvement at that time. We are pulling the specs at this time but find that the front docs generated by the City were forwarded to the City as "originals" along with the original drawings. These are probably archaic now in any case and will need to he regenerated by the appropriate agencies. Knowing that you need to get the project on the street, we are readying Kent to begin work if the above is satisfactory. illis AIA Gillis &"Associates Architects. 2900 BRISTOL STREET, G-205 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA TEL 714-668-4260 FAX 714-668-4265 www.gillisarchitects.com 07/31/00 09:54 TX/RX NO.9109 August 1, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PIER PLAZA PAVEMENT REPAIR Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: Award the construction contract for the terrazzo pavement and concrete curb repair on Pier Plaza east of the Pier head, to Shaw& Sons Concrete Contractors in the amount of $19,771; 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the construction contract subject to approval by the city Attorney; and 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to make minor changes as necessary within the budget of $1,977. Background: Prior to the Fiesta Hermosa, which took place from May 27th to May 29th this year, it became imperative that the restrooms just south of the pier be repaired in preparation for the event. A section of the Strand Bikeway & Pedestrian Walkway and a section of Pier Plaza were removed in order to connect the new sewer line from the restrooms to an existing manhole in west side of Pier Plaza. The concrete portion of the Strand was repaved, and the Pier Plaza area was covered with temporary asphalt. This sewer work was completed on May 26, 2000 and charged as a change order to Project No. CIP 98-621 Pier Renovation, Phase 11. The general contractor for Project No. CIP 98-621, Los Angeles Engineering, was neither qualified to do the terrazzo pavement work, nor able to find a subcontractor who was qualified, in the time frame allowed. After numerous requests, Staff was finally able to persuade Salvador Robledo, a representative of Shaw & Sons, to visit the site on June 14, 2000 and process a quote. Shaw & Sons submitted a quote on June 27, 2000 in the amount of $19,771. During the month of July, Staff continued to search for other contractors experienced with terrazzo pavement for the purpose of. soliciting and comparing quotes. Two prospective contractors were found, but both have failed to quote the work. This was apparently due to the abundance of available projects with larger scopes of work. 10 Shaw & Sons Concrete Contractors was the original contractor for the Pier Plaza terrazzo paving. They were again contracted for repair work to the Pier Plaza on June 15, 1999. Theyare the only contractor found available to do the present repair work. Shaw & Sons seems to be the sole source contractor for the Pier Plaza terrazzo pavement. Analysis: Staff reviewed thequote given by Shaw & Sons for scope of work and found it to be acceptable. Whether the price is relatively low or high cannot be determined because no other contractors are willing to quote the work. Therefore, Staff recommends that Shaw & Sons Concrete Contractors be recognized as a "sole source" contractor for the terrazzo pavement repair and be awarded the contract for the Pier Plaza pavement repair: Since the Pier Plaza pavement repair work is an incidental result of the restrooms sewer line installation, the cost should be absorbed by the Pier Renovation Sewer Funds. Phase Ill contains the majority of the sewer funds, whereas Phase ll only had enough funds to do the actual sewer line installation. Fiscal Impact: The FY 2000-01 budget for Project No. 00-630 Pier Renovation, Phase Ill provides for $234,216 forthe construction and repair of sewer lines for the new lifeguard facilities and restroomimprovements in account no. 160-8630-4201. Upon the completion of. this work, approximately $212,468 will be the balance of that account. Respectfully submitted, D Tristan D. Malabanan Harold C. Williams, P.E. Assistant Engineer Director of Public Works/City Engineer Noted for fiscal impact: Concur: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Ste tQ�r "� lu rdil City Manager f:\b95\pwfiies\ccitems\00-630 Pier Plaza Terrazzo Repair 8-1-00 August 2, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council August 8, 2000 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR AUDIT SERVICES -Do Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council award a three year audit contract (covering fiscal years 1999-00 through 2001-02, totaling $61,580, with an option to extend the agreement for two additional fiscal years), to the firm of Caporicci, Cropper & Larson, LLP (CC& L). Background: The City contracted. with Caporicci & Larson for audit services from 1995 through 1997 with an extension through 1999. (The firm has since merged with another firm, adding another partner to the name.) Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Recommended Practice for Audit Procurement was followed for auditor selection (best practices): A request for proposals for audit services for fiscal years 1999-02, with a two-year extension option, was -issued on June 8, 2000; six proposals were received by the City Clerk on June • 29, 2000. The City Treasurer, Finance Director and Accounting Supervisor (Selection Panel) reviewed the proposals and rated the firms on the quality of the written response and the contract cost. Based on those ratings, the top three firms were interviewed by the Selection Panel Analysis: One of the factors that weighed heavily in the selection is a major change in financial reporting that will take place during this contract, assuming the two-year extension option is exercised. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) 34 is effective for cities our size during fiscal year 2002-03. Two of the major impacts in the new model are (1) changes to the existing financial statements and the addition of government -wide statements with a different basis of accounting and (2) the accounting and recording of infrastructure assets (streets, streetlights, sewer systems, etc:). The firm selected will assist the City in planning for, as well as implementing, GASB 34. Of the three firms interviewed, Caporicci, Cropper & Larson and Moreland and Associates were the most knowledgeable about GASB 34 and seemed most capable of assisting the City with implementation. 1p F:b95/AUDIT AWARD.DOC The Selection Panel recommends that the City retain CC & L for the following reasons: • The firm is knowledgeable about GASB 34 and capable of assisting the City with implementation at the earliest time desired. The partner in charge teaches accounting classes, including GASB 34, at the college level and has already converted one city to GASB 34 for modeling purposes. • The firm is familiar with the City's processes and records. The time that would be spent with a new firm to familiarize them with the City can be spent on GASB 34 planning. • Their performance on past audits has been very good. The partner is always available for consultation when needed. • While the cost should not be a primary consideration for professional services, CC & L's fees are lower than in the past contract by $5,170 and $7,120 lower than Moreland & Associates: The Selection Panel discounted any concern about rotation of auditors since different managers will be assigned during the contract period, giving fresh perspective, and since both partners participate in the audit. The continuity, experience and GASB 34 expertise was valued higherthan any concern about rotation. Below is a comparison of proposed audit fees and hours for the three firms in the initial three years. Year Moreland & Associates, Inc. Lance, Soll & Lunohard, LLP Caporicci, Cropper & Larson, LLP 99-00 00-01 01-02 TOTAL: $60,400 NOTE: There will likely be additional costs for GASB 34 implementation. All proposals are available in the Finance Department. Gary Caporicci will be present at the City Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland Fin nce Director Valerie Mohler Accounting Supervisor J orkman it easurer CONC-': 1 ANS sit_ . ell Ste City Manager F:b95/AUDIT AWARD.DOC August 3, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 APPROPRIATION: BALANCE OF MILLENNIUM FUND TO THE DEC SPECIAL EVENT ACCOUNT Recommendation Staff recommends that Council appropriate the balance of $6,801.23 remaining in the. Millennium Fund to the DEC Special Event Account to be used for City -sponsored event(s). Background The Hermosa Beach 2000 celebration was funded entirely through donations raised through corporate sponsorship and from the Millennium Walkway brick sales. The New Year's Eve celebration expenses were paid in full, leaving a remaining balance of $6,801.23. Analysis The funds were collected for a hometown celebration, making a City -sponsored community event a good place to commit the remaining dollars. If Council approves this use of the funds, staff will dedicate them the next major community event the City presents. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE. FUNDS ARE CURRENLY IN THE MILLENNIUM DONATION ACCOUNT. Respectfully submitted, Mary C '...T' y Direct "r, Community Resources Concur: Ste ` en R. Burrell City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM Date: August 3, 2000 To: Honorable Mayor and. Members of the City Council From: Sol Blumenfeld f ''rector, Community De elopment Department Subject: Text Amendment Regarding Nonconforming Remodel (Chapter 17.52) to Clarify the Limits for Expanding/Remodeling Residential Buildings. Nonconforming to Parking Requirements. Recommendation: To continue the public hearing on this item to the September 12th meeting. In order to hear this item at the same meeting when residential development standards for open space are being considered, staff recommends continuance to the next meeting. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 00-2 PURPOSE: TO CLARIFY THE DEFINITION OF LOT COVERAGE INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting of August 8,2000 oto Recommendation To introduce the attached ordinance to amend the definition of "lot coverage" in the Zoning Ordinance. Background At their meeting of February 15, 2000, the Planning Commission voted torecommend the proposed clarification of the lot coverage definition. The Planning Commission initiated this clarification to resolve a code interpretation issue presented by staff at their meeting of December 1, 1999. The Zoning Ordinance definition of lot coverage is' as follows; "Lot coverage" includes the footprint of the building plus cantilevers and decks higher than thirty (30) inches above grade. Exceptions, not to be included when calculating lot coverage are: architectural projections, eaves, and open and unenclosed balconies that project from the face of the building, not exceeding a five-foot projection. The definition has become an issue as builders seek to maximize building coverage on the site. City staff and builders can have differing perceptions of "footprint of the building" and "grade," which leads to.different conclusions. Also, the exceptions were discussed for possible elimination in connection with the amendments being considered to residential development standards. The Commission did not find it appropriate to eliminate the exceptions, because they felt they contribute to the architecture of buildings. Footprint is most obviously the area of the building covering the ground, but it might also be interpreted to include stairs and stair landings on grade, walkways, patios, pools, or other features which are generally on grade and not part of the building footprint. The only accessory and appurtenant structures specifically identified in the definition are "decks higher than 30 inches above grade", leaving out structures such as accessory buildings or other structures that may not have foundations (tool sheds, storage sheds), or wood or metal stair structures, which probably should be included. The definition also does not distinguish between existing or finished grade relating to the phrase decks higher than 30 inches above grade. This can make a significant difference in determining whether a deck (or the stairs leading to it) is higher that 30 inches above grade and whether it should be included in lot coverage. In the absence of any reference to .finished grade, staff has assumed that it refers to existing grade. Further, at their meeting of June 20th the Commission interpreted the exception for "open • and unenclosed balconies" to not include stacked balconies, since the top balcony covers the lower balcony. After reviewing this interpretation, the Council may consider additional language to clarify this exception. Analysis The Commission recommended a text amendment to the definition section of the Zoning Ordinance to clarify that "footprint of the building," includes the portion of the building with a foundation, cantilevers as specified, and other structures that cover the ground such as accessory buildings, or structural stairs (but not fences or walls). Further, the exceptions from lot coverage is proposed to be revised to clearly state that changes to finished grade as surface for stairs, patios, walkways, planters, eta are not included in lot coverage: The Commission also agreed that the threshold of 30" above grade, as it applies to "decks" should be clearly stated as a measurement relating to existing grade, determined the same way grade is determined for measuring building height: In regards to the interpretation of the exception for open and unenclosed balconies the Commission interpreted that a balcony covered by another balcony is not "open and unenclosed" and thus must count towards lot coverage. This differs, from past interpretations made by staff If the Council supports the Commission's interpretation, staff would recommend that the phrase be amended to say open, uncovered, and unenclosed balconies. obertson CONCUR: Associate Planner ru 7�YiJ lu Sol Blume eld, Director Communit Development Department 111 Step PrR. urrelf City Manager Attachments 1. Current/P.C. Recommended Text 2: Proposed Ordinance 3: Planning. Commission Minutes/Resolution 4. P.C. Minutes 6/20 regarding interpretation of balcony exception Current Text P.C. Recommended "Lot coverage" includes the footprint of the "Lot coverage" includes the footprint of all building plus cantilevers and decks higher than buildings on the site (footprint is the area of the thirty (30) inches above grade. building located on a foundation); cantilevers projecting from the building; the area covered Exceptions, not to be included when by appurtenant structures such as decks and calculating lot coverage are: architectural stairs if higher than 30 inches above grade as projections, eaves, and open and unenclosed defined herein for determining building height; balconies that project from the face of the and accessory buildings such as garages, storage building, not exceeding a five-foot projection `...,- sheds, batthouses, etc. o- C : C� Exceptions, not to be included when calculating lot coverage are: architectural projections; eaves; open, uncovered*, and unenclosed balconies that project five feet, or less from the face of the building; non structural stairs, patios, walkways, and planters which establish finished grade; and fences and walls. *recommended added change if Council supports P.C. interpretation regarding stacked balconies. 3 5 6 10 12 13 14 L5 16 '17 18 19. 20 21. 22 23 24 25 26 27 2.8 29 AN ORDINANCE OF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CLARIFY THE DEFINITION OF LOT COVERAGE The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve and order as follows:' Section 1. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on August 8, 2000, to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission to amend the Zoning Ordinance to amend and clarify the definition of "lot coverage." Section 2. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on February 15, 2000, and recommended amending the Zoning Ordinance to amend and clarify the definition of "lot coverage." Section 3: Based'on the evidence considered at the public hearing, and the record of the decision of the Planning Commission, the City Council makes the following finding: 1. The definition of lot coverage is somewhat ambiguous, allowing for differing perceptions of "footprint of the building" and "grade," which leads to different conclusions as to what part of the building and accessory structures are considered in the maximum lot coverage. Section 4. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby ordains that the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Title 17 -Zoning, be amended as follows: Amend the definition of "lot coverage" as contained in Section 17.04.040 to read as follows: "Lot coverage" includes the footprint of all buildings on the site (footprint is the area of the buildinglocated on a foundation); cantilevers projecting from the building; the area covered by appurtenant structures such as decks and.stairs if higher than 30 inches above grade as defined herein for determining building height; and accessory buildings such as garages, storage sheds, batthouses, etc. Exceptions, not to be included when calculating lot coverage are: architectural projections; eaves; open, uncovered, and unenclosed balconies that project five feet or less from the face of the building; non-structural stairs, patios, walkways, and planters which establish finished grade; and fences and walls. Section 5. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 6. ` Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach in the manner provided by law. 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Section 7. • The City Clerk shall 'certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney B95/cd/cc/ordlotcov 10 12 - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RESOLUTION P.C. 00-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA,TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF LOT COVERAGE The Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on February 15, 2000, to consider amending the Zoning Ordinance to amend and clarify the definition of "lot coverage." Section 2. Based on the evidence considered at the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. The definition of lot coverage is somewhat ambiguous, allowing for differing perceptions of "footprint of the building" and"grade," which leads to different conclusions as to what part of the building and accessory structures are considered in the maximum lot coverage. Section 3. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Title 17 -Zoning, be amended as follows: Amend the definition of "lot coverage" as contained in Section 17.04.040 to read as follows: "Lot coverage" includes the footprint of all buildings on the site (footprint is the area of the building located on a foundation); cantilevers projecting from the building; the area covered by appurtenant structures such as decks and stairs if higher than 30 inches above grade as defined herein for determining building height; and accessory buildings such as garages, storage sheds, batthouses, etc. Exceptions, not to be included when calculating lot coverage are: architectural projections; eaves; open and unenclosed balconies that project five feet or less from the face of the building; non-structural stairs, patios, walkways, and planters which establish finished grade; and fences and walls." VOTE: AYES: Hoffman, Schwartz, Pizer, Chairman Perrotti NOES: None ABSTAIN: Vice -Chair Ketz ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION. I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 00-14 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of February 15, 2000. am Perrotti, Chairman #,cam -C472 / a 9Oi Date d Remodeling are subject to the requirements of Section 17.52.030. if the building or buil do n • s ave the required guest parking or garage setback." Chairman Perrotti a ened the public hearing. Chairman Perrotti closed the p 1. hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Pizer and serod - • by Chairman Hoffman to APPROVE TEXT 00-1 — Text amendment regarding no oofiforming erriodel Section 17.52 , as modified.. AYES: Hoffman NOES: N ABSENT: ice -Chair Ketz AB • IN: None wartz, Pizer, Chairman Perrotti 14. TEXT 00-2 -- TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING LOT COVERAGE EXCEPTION SECTION 17.04. Staff Recommended Action: To recommend approval of said text amendment. Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report. Commissioner Pizer inquired about the term the "face of the building. Director Blumenfeld indicated that the term refers to the finished exterior surface of a building. CommissionerSchwartzrequested correction of "batthouses" to "bathhouses" in the suggested language and Resolution. Chairman Perrotti opened the public hearing. Pete Tucker, 235 34th Street, Hermosa Beach, pointed out in the suggested language that garages are not an accessory building and should be removed from this language. Director Blumenfeld noted that the Zoning Ordinance does define garages as an accessory structure. Chairman Perrotti closed the public hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Hoffman and seconded by Commissioner Schwartz to APPROVE TEXT 00-2 — Text amendment regarding lot coverage exception Section 17.04, as amended with corrected spelling. AYES: Hoffman, Schwartz, Pizer, Chairman Perrotti NOES: " None ABSENT: Vice -Chair Ketz ABSTAIN: None P.C. Minutes 02-15-00 • N .by Commissioner Pizer, seconded by Commissioner Hoffman to CONTINUE CUP 99- 3 for 90 . a . • . APPROVE the amended Conditional Use Permit and plan submitted, wi exception of the patio a : . allow the owner to work with staff on the details of e AYES: Hoffman, Ketz, Pizer, Chair NOES: None ABSENT: Sc AB ST 13. STAFF ITEMS Code interpretation of lot coverage at 331-333 11th Street. Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff report and said that staff is seeking an interpretation as to what the word "open" represents in relation to unenclosed balconies and lot coverage. He questioned if an unenclosed balcony needs to be "opento sky" in order to be considered "open" and excluded from lot coverage calculations. He also reviewed the zoning requirements for residential open space and indicated that if required open space can be covered and still be considered open space, perhaps unenclosed balconies can be covered by eaves or other unenclosed balconies (which are excluded from lot coverage calculations) and still be exceptions that are not to be included when calculating lot coverage. In response to Commissioner Pizer, Director Blumenfeld stated that 30 inches of architectural projection is permitted: Vice -Chair Ketz indicated that the lower balcony isnot considered "open" according to the Zoning Code, as it is covered by a balcony above and that thisdesign defeats the purpose of maximum lot coverage regulations which is intended to reduce bulk and increase open areas on a lot. In response to Chairman Perrotti, Director Blumenfeld stated that the footprint of the building would have to be made smaller or the balcony eliminated if the balcony is considered lot coverage. He further indicated that when the plans were originally submitted, they were zone checked staff had two interpretations due to ambiguity in the Zoning Ordinance. The Commission confirmed by MINUTE ORDER that the upper level balcony does not meet the definition of Section 17.04.040 and does not meet the criteria for exception.. • ndum regarding review of plan revisions for the seven -unit condo *niu t 710-720 is ate -d that staff is requesting that the m 100 square foot decks for ons consistent w 'ntent of the Director Blumenfeld summarized the staff repo di Commission interpret whether the revise a _ s of providing each unit adjacent to the livi .ms are minor modifications Conditions of A.. : , . , or require amendment to the CUP acid PDP. He also indicate now som ntrusion of these decks into the originally approved setback. • . • e is P.C. Minutes 06-20-00 June 13,2000 Honorable Chairman and Members of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission Regular Meeting of June 20, 2000 SUBJECT: CODE INTERPRETATION — LOT COVERAGE DEFINITION SECTION 17.04.040 LOCATION: 331-333 1 1th Street Recommendation Direct staff as deemed appropriate relative to determining the intent of the. Zoning Ordinance. Background The subject property is being redeveloped with two new condominiums, which are currently under construction. The proposed balcony/deck is adjacent to the master bedroom and is directly underneath another balcony/deck. Both the lower and upper balconies are unenclosed and cantilever 5 feet from the building face. "Lot Coverage'%s defined in Section 17.04.040 as the footprint of the building plus cantilevers and decks higher than thirty(30) inches above grade. Exceptions, not to be included when calculating lot coverage are: architectural. projections, eaves, and open and unenclosed balconies that project from the face of the building, not exceeding a five-foot projection. The Zoning Ordinance definition of lot coverage states that open and unenclosed balconies that project. from the face of the building not exceeding a five-foot projection, as well as eaves and architectural projections,. are exceptions that are not to be included when calculating lot coverage. Analysis Staff is seeking an interpretation as to what the word "open" represents in relation to unenclosed balconies and lot coverage., Because another balcony/deck is directly above theproposed balcony/deck, it is not considered to be "open to the sky." Does an unenclosed balcony need to be "open to sky" in order to be considered "open" and excluded from lot coverage calculations? A possible interpretation could be found by examining the zoning requirements for residential open space. Required open space in the R-2 and R-3 residential zones is allowed to be covered up to fifty (50) percent and still count as open space. Thus, if required open space can be covered and still be considered open space, perhaps unenclosed balconies can be covered by eaves or other unenclosed balconies (which are excluded from lot coverage calculations) and still be exceptions that are not to be included when calculating lot coverage. CONCUR: J Sol : umenfe •, 1 irector Community D velopment Department Planning Assistant Attachments 1. Applicant's Correspondence 2. Partial Plans OL/6-/L) 1.3a City of Hermosa Beach Community Development Department Attention: Sol Blumenfeld 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Sol, As discussed in our meeting last Thursday am writing to formally request a code interpretation with respect to site coverage. In past projects there has been an inconsistency by staff in reviewing decks over decks and whether the five foot exception to site coverage applies. The code states "open and unenclosed balconies that project from the face of the building, not exceeding a five-foot projection not be included when calculating lot coverage." The question is whether "open" is to the sky or not. The project on 331, 333 11th Street initially had a balcony off the master bedroom. This balcony was not needed for open space, but was included to help break up a flat facade. We were told to remove this balcony ( which is under a balcony off the living room) so that the building would comply with the site coverage requirement. In projectsin the past we have had the exact same condition and not been penalized toward site coverage. The owners of this property would like to put the balcony back in this project. In past City Council meetings the concept of reducing bulk and mass are constantly mentioned. I believe allowing the balcony exception helps visually to achieve this. Thank you for your attention to this matter and I look forward to a resolution. Sincerely, 67 1 4th S T R E E T HERMOSA BCH` CA 90254 ( 3 1 0 ) 372-1755 FAX (310) 3 6-0337 • ri WEST ELEVATION Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 31, 2000 Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO 2000-2001 LOS ANGELES COUNTY URBAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM PURPOSE: Recommendation: Approve by minute order the reallocation and expenditure of $25,000 of the sixth year 2000-2001 Block Grant to the utility under -grounding project for assistance to low and moderate income households. REALLOCATE $25,000 FROM CDBG FUNDING FOR RETROFITTING PUBLIC FACILITIES TO REMOVE ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS TO THE DISABLED TO THE UTILITY UNDER -GROUNDING PROJECT FOR ASSISTANCE TO LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. COMPLY WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING/PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENT OF THE CDBG PROGRAM Background: During the course of implementing the Loma Dr. and Myrtle Aver under -grounding districts, some area residents indicated that they did not have the financial resources to participate in the projects. Staff inquired about the possibility of using a portion of CDBG funding to provide financial assistance to qualifying low and moderate income residents. The Los Angeles County Community Development Commission, which administers the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, estimated the City's allocation to be $141,226 for the 2000- 2001 fiscal year. Analysis: In order to assist households that may need financial help with the cost of installing utilities from the -public right-of-way to dwelling units in areas designated for utility under -grounding, $25,000 can be allocated from the City's annual CDBG program allocation. According to program guidelines, households receiving financial assistance cannot have an annual income exceeding the amounts shown on the attached guidelines. The City must determine that a household qualifies for assistance by reviewing the household income tax records. Michael Schubach City Planner. CONCUR APPROVED FOR FISCAL IMPACT tro $ 1 ,/ Sol Blumenf d, W'rector Community 1 evelopment Department Stephen . Burrell City Manager Attachments 1. Income Guidelines cdbg00-0l amend Viki Copeland Finance. Director LOS ANGELES COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION • 2 Coral Circle • Monterey Park, California 9i 755 NUMBER: DATE: 00-0020 SUBJECT: March 15, 2000 EFFECTIVE DATE: 2000 INCOME GUIDELINES Immediately PAGE 1 OF TO: PARTICIPATING CITIES COUNTY DEPARTMENTS COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS CDC DIVISIONS The 2000 income -guidelines for use in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program are listed below. These guidelines should be used to determine compliance with the national objective of providing benefit to low- and moderate -income persons. They are also used in determining eligibility for the Public Housing and Section 8 Programs and are effective until a new schedule is issued. INCOME LIMITS FAMILY SIZE 1 PERSON 2 PERSON 3 PERSON 4 PERSON 5 PERSON 6 PERSON 7 PERSON 8 PERSON 1t(:)UE E f=. - [NCU \(E S29,200 S33,350 S37,500 $41,700 S45,000 548,350 S51,700 S55,000 LO C'- INCOME S 18, 250 S20,850 S23,450 $26,050 528,150 S39,200 S32,300 S31.100 EXTREMELY 510,950 512,500. S14,050 515,650 S16,900 518,150 519,400 520,650 These guidelines refer to low-income, very low-income and extremely low-income. In order to clarify ani- misunderstandin2 resulting from the differences in terms between the Public. Housing / Section 8 Programs. and the CDBG Program, the following is provided for your information. COMPARISON OF TERMS IN DETERMINING INCOME LEVELS CDBG SECTION 8 . PERCENT OF MEDIAN Extremely Low -Income Not Applicable . Equal to or less than 30% Low -Income Very Low -Income 31% to 50% Moderate -Income Lower -Income 51% to 80% NOTE: Los Angeles County Median Family Income = $52,100 . Strengthening Neighborhoods. Supporting Local Economies. Empowering Families • Promoting Individual Achievement To All Recipients March 15, 2000 Page Two If you have ani• questions on how the income limits were derived, please contact the Economic and Market _ .nalysis Division of the Los :Angeles .\rea Office of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development at (213) 894-8010. Should you have any other questions, please contact your Program Manager. Sincerely, TERRY GONZALEZ, Director Community Development Block Grant Division TG:_ N:ec E\home\ec\2000 Income Guidelines Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council July 31,;2000 Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SIMILAR USE PROVISION FOR ZONED PROPERTY Recommendation: That the City Council confirm that architect studio use is similar to other uses permitted in the M-1 Zone pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.28.020 of the Zone Code. Background: On August 10, .1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 99-1193 creating a revised permitted use list for M-1 (manufacturing) zoned properties, and modifying Conditional Use Permit requirements for certain M-1 uses. Analysis: Staff has received a request to consider issuance of a building permit for work in conjunction with a proposed architect studio_(Please see correspondence.). The permitted use list currently contains a list of manufacturing and service related uses including artist studio, but does not include architect studio. An artist studio typically includes creative work space consisting of work tables, drawing space, space for preparing models and graphicrepresentations and ancillary office, and storage area An architect studio typically contains similar work space with work tables,` drawing tables and space for preparing models and graphic representations in conjunction with ancillary office and storage area. The amount of general office space cannot exceed 25% of the gross floor area of the building pursuant to Section 17.3 8.020. Section 17:28.025 states that: (a) When a use is not specifically listed in this Chapter, it shall be understood that the use may be permitted if it is determined by the Community Development Director that the use is similar to other uses listed This section further states: (e) The determination that the proposed use is similar must be confirmed by the City Council. Staff believes that the two uses are similar creative businesses appropriate in the M-1 zone. Sol Blumenfelc Community D , Director cvelopment Department Steph -!' ' .: urrell, City Manager Attachments: 1. Chapter 17.28 2. Correspondence Chapter 17.28 M-1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE Sections: 17.28.010 17.28.020 17.28.025 17.28.030 Specific Purposes. Permitted Uses. Similar Use Permitted. Standards and Limitations. 17.28.010. Specific Purposes. In addition to the general purposes listed in Chapter 17.02 the specific purposes of the Light Manufacturing zone is to: A. Provide appropriately located areas consistent with the General Plan for a range of light manufacturing and warehousing, distribution uses. and certain appropriate service commercial uses: B. Strengthen the city's economic base and employment base, but also protect existing small businessesthat, serve and employ city residents. C. Create and maintain suitable environments for various types of manufacturing and compatible uses, and protect them from the adverse effects of inharmonious uses. D. Minimize the impact of development in the M-1 zone on adjacent residential districts. E. Ensure that the appearance and effects of manufacturing and commercial buildings in the M-1 zone are harmonious with the character of the area in which they are located. F. Ensure the provision of adequate off-street parking and loading facilities. (Ord. 99- 1193 §4 (part); 09/14/99; Prior code Appx. A, §9-1) 17.28.020 Permitted Uses. In the following matrix, the letter. "P" designates use classifications permitted and the letter "U" designates use classifications permitted by approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Use classifications not listed are prohibited._ Section numbers listed under "see -section" reference additional regulations located elsewhere in the Zoning Ordinance or Municipal Code. (See matrix on page three) A. 17.28.016J. 17.28.025. Similar Use Permitted. When a use is not specifically listed in this Chapter, it shall be understood that the use may be permitted if it is determined by the Community Development Director that the use is similar to other uses listed. It is further recognized , that every conceivable use cannot be identified in this Article, and anticipating that new uses will evolve over time, this Section establishes the Community Development Director with the authority to compare a proposed use and measure it _ against those listed for determining similarity subject to confirmation by the City Council. ' In determining similarity the Director shall make all of the following findings: A. The proposed use shall meet the intent of, and be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan; B. The proposed use shall meet the stated purpose and general intent of the zone in which the use is proposed to be located; C. The proposed use shall not adversely impact the public health, safety and general welfare of the City's residents; D. The proposed use shall share characteristics common with, and not be of greater intensity, density or environmental impact, than those uses listed in the zone in which it is to be located; and, E. The determination that the proposed use is similar must be confirmed by the City Council. (Ord. 99-1193 §4 (part); 09/14/99) 17.28.030 Standards and limitations. Every use permitted, or maintained in the M-1 zone shall be subject to the following: A. Parking. Parking shall be provided as specified in Chapter 17.44. B. Enclosures. : All uses shall be conducted wholly within building enclosed on all sides, except for the following: 1. Outdoor uses permitted by conditional use permit as stated in the permitted use list; • Commercialparking lots; Uses incidental to a use conducted primarily within a building located on Supp. 7 (9/99) the premises; provided, that such incidental uses are not conducted in whole or in part on sidewalks, public ways or within any required front or rear yard; and provided . further, that such incidental uses are conducted within buildings. Where incidental uses are not conducted within a building, no part of the area devoted to the incidental uses shall be considered as part of the required parking facilities. All outdoor storage shall be substantially screened from pubic visibility, public streets, parks or other public places and property. C. Signs. Signs for this section are regulated by Section 17.50.140. D. Building Height. Any building may have a maximum of thirty-five (35) feet in height and have a maximum; of two stories. Oil and gas operations may exceed this height for a temporary period of time and to a height as set forth in an , approved conditional use permit pursuant to Ordinance No. 85-803. E. Front Yard Setback. No lot need provide a front yard except as may be required by a precise plan. F. Alley 'Setback. Any building located on an alley shall maintain a distance of not less than three feet from such alley. G. Rear < and Side Yard Setback Adjacent to Residential Zones. A minimum rear and/or side yard setbackof eight feet shall be provided, and additional two feet of setback shall be provided for each story over the first story for structures that abut residential zones, except where public rights-of-way, twenty (20) feet or greater in width, separate the M-1 zone from the residential zone. H. Landscaping Adjacent . to Residential Zones. The required rear and/or side yard area shall be landscaped and provided with an automatic watering system. Size, quantity and type of landscaping shall be subject to review and approval by the planning director. Landscaping shall be appropriately maintained, trimmed and void of weeds. (Prior code Appx. A, § 9-3) Supp.,? (9/99) (17-28) 2 3 M-1 ZONE, LAND USE REGULATIONS P = Permitted U = C.U.P. Required (See Chapter 17.40) Administrative offices accessory to a primary permitted use (listed P below), not exceeding twenty-five percent of the gross floor area Artist studio Audio/Visual recording studio P. Motor Vehicle and equipment service: General repair, service, installation of parts and accessories Body repair and painting Chapter 17.40 Chapter 17.40 Manufacturing, fabrication, assembly, testing, repair, servicing and processing of the following products and materials: Coated, plated and engraved metal products Diecut paper, paperboard, cardboard Machinery Equipment and supplies Surfboards U Chapter 17.40 Manufacturing, fabrication, assembly, testing, repair, 'servicing and processing of the following products and materials Apparel Audio/Visual products Awnings Bakery Products Communications, Equipment Confectionery *and related products Electronic components, computers, and accessories Electric lighting and wiring. equipment Stone and cut stone products Furniture and fixtures Glass products Household tools and hardware Jewelry, silverware, and plated ware Luggage Motor vehicle parts and accessories Musical instruments and parts Office and household machines and appliances Office products P.. Paperboard containers and boxes Pharmaceutical Products Photographic and optical goods, watches and clocks Hardware, plumbing, heating equipment and supplies Pottery, and related products Professional, scientific and controlling instruments Toys, amusements, sporting andathletic goods surfboards) Wooden containers Wholesale distribution of the products and materials listed above, and including the following: Packaged groceries and related products •(Ord. 99-1.193 §4 (part); 09/14/99 (17-28) 4 oakes architects August 1, 2000 City of Hermosa Beach City Hall, Office of City Manager 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Attention: Steve Burrell Regarding: Request for Permitted Use Dear Steve: Recently, Oakes Architects became interested in a property on Cypress Avenue. We are planning to move our architectural offices into; this location in September. The zone for this area is M1-1, Light Manufacturing. While Architectural companies are not specified under the Permitted Use list, we are confident that Architectural studios are compatible and allied with the permitted uses, since both artistic and technical production are utilized to create the end product. We are requesting that a determination be made under code Section 17.28.025 of the Hermosa Beach Planning and Zoning Code, that we are a use that is.permitted within the.M1-1 Zone. Oakes Architects and our staff is excited about moving to Hermosa Beach and we look forward to creating a Company building and professional environment that is an asset to the Community. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Oakes and Associates Architects, AIA Los Angeles • Hermosa Beach Julie Oakes, AIA Leland Oakes, AIA Historic Helms Complex 8800 Venice Boulevard Suite 217 Los Angeles, CA 90034 Phone 310.838.2808 Fax 310.838.6582 Email oakes@mail.mlinet.com Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council July 26, 2000. Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 ORDINANCE NO. 96-1165 STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION CONTROL AMENDMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council introduce for first reading, Ordinance No. 00 - entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION CONTROL ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FOR PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Background: On January 26, 2000, the Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted a Resolution approving the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP). This approval expanded the region's required storm water control and regulation responsibilities by further addressing the issues of construction planning and development planning. As part of - NPDES' (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) permit requirements, and under the provisions of the Board's Resolution, all Cities have until September 8, 2000 to adopt an Ordinance to implement the SUSMP requirements. In compliance with the terms of the Board's mandate, Staff has prepared the attached _Ordinance. Analysis: This Ordinance will regulate the reduction of storm water pollution in four fundamental ways: Requiring all construction sites within the City to adhere to established Best Management Practices (BMP's) for the reduction of potential pollutants. Requiring the development of pollution prevention plans for construction sites. Requiring new developments to incorporate structural BMP's into their designs to reduce stormwater runoff and pollutant migration Establishing an on-going inspection and maintenance program for developments that install treatment control BMP's with the exception of the construction BMP's that will commonly apply to all exterior construction, these new regulations will apply to any of the following types of development: Subdivisions consisting of ten more single-family homes. Residential developments involving the grading of any natural slope that is twenty-five percent or greater. Commercial or industrial developments that create at least 100,000 square feet of impermeable area, including parking areas. Parking lots of 5,000 square feet or more, or twenty-five or more parking spaces potentially exposed to rainfall. Various specified industrial and commercial uses, such as auto repair facilities and restaurants. Environmentally sensitive areas: Fiscal Impact: It is expected that plan checking, inspection and enforcement costs will be incorporated into existing budgets. Staff has created attached plan check fee (Exhibit A) to be charged to developers to recover the City's cost to review the SUSMP's for compliance. Attachment: Ordinance No. 00 Respectfully_ submitted, Concur: Homayoun Behboodi Associate Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: /Harold C. Williams, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Concur: Of,"Algae St-�:t'en R. Burre�I Viki Copeland Finance Director City Manager F\B95\Pwfites\Ccitems\storm water amend ordin EXHIBIT A CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION AND CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN CHECK FEES STORM WAT RMI' GATION i'LAN.CHECK< t > 3 x t .� cY are € - Category s z t� � ` r3 s ei3y BIan Chec Fee ° z Single family home on a hillside $ 255.00 Auto Repair Facility $ 331.50 Retail Gasoline Outlet $ 331.50 Restaurant $ 331.50 200 space parking lot $ 255.00 � Gfl1 2T TIfl T ST i%1 A :a R flLi. trrio .i Pi Ifl Z' A I Baa s as tor* �, tr s . i c rky a v , Protects witha total disturbed aeaflf•� T 4aa, r9 �+�.:. �Sw'e .e m �,..xra'n.�`Wx.5�-.`�+L, a �c Flan CheckFee At least 0.25 acres but less than 2 acres $ 460.00 At least 2 acres but less than 5 acres $ 460.00 + $0.154/100 square feet over 2 acres More than 5 acres $ 745.00 + $0.154/100 square feet over 5 acres Non-residential sites under 0.25 acres which is determined by the Community Development Director to require a plan review $ 230.00 * Plus $85.00 per hour for second and all subsequent reviews of resubmittals. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION CONTROL ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FOR PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain, as follows: Section 1. Section 8.44.020 of Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding thereto a new subparagraph (D) to read as follows: "D. This Chapter also sets forth requirements for the construction and operation of certain "Commercial Development", "New Development" and "Redevelopment" and other projects (as further defined herein) which are intended to ensure compliance with the storm water mitigation measures prescribed in the current version of the Standard Urban Storm. Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board -Los Angeles Region, and on file in the office of the City Clerk of this City. This Chapter authorizes the Authorized Enforcement Officer to define and adopt applicable Best Management Practices and other storm water pollution control measures, to grant waivers from SUSMP requirements, as provided herein, to collect funds from projects which are granted such waivers, to cite infractions and to impose fines pursuant to this Chapter. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Authorized Enforcement Officer shall administer, implement and enforce the provisions of this section." Section 2. The first (preamble) paragraph of Section 8.44.030 of Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Except as specifically provided herein, any term used in this Chapter shall have the same meaning as that term as defined in the current Municipal NPDES Permit, or as defined in the current version of the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan ("SUSMP") approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board -Los Angeles Region, or if it is not specifically defined in either the Municipal NPDES Permit or the SUSMP, then as such term is defined in the Federal Clean Water. Act, as amended, and/or the regulations promulgated thereunder. If the definition of any term contained in this ordinance conflicts with the definition of the same term in the current version of the SUSMP, then the definition contained in the SUSMP shall govern. The following are definitions of terms used in this chapter:" Section 3. Paragraph 1 of Section 8.44.030 of Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code defining the term "Best management practices" is hereby amended to read as follows: 12131\0002\617640.1 ""Best Management Practices (BMP's)" means activities, practices, facilities, and/or procedures that when implemented to their maximum efficiency will prevent or reduce pollutants in discharges and any program, technology, process, siting criteria, operational methods or measures, or engineered systems, which when implemented prevent, control, remove, or reduce pollution. Examples of BMP's may include public education and outreach, proper planning of development projects, proper cleaning of catch basin inlets, and proper sludge- or waste -handling and disposal, among others." Section 4. Section 8.44.030 of Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the following new definitions in alphabetical sequence and by renumbering the existing subparagraphs of that Section accordingly: ""Automotive Repair Shop" means a facility that is categorized in any one of the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes: 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, or 7536- 7539 (as amended). "Commercial Development" means any development on private land that is not heavy industrial or residential The category includes, but is not limited to: hospitals, laboratories and other medical facilities, educational institutions, recreational facilities, plant nurseries, multi - apartment buildings, car wash facilities, mini -malls and other business complexes, shopping malls, hotels, office buildings, public warehouses and other light industrial complexes. "Discretionary Project" means a project which requires the exercise of judgment or deliberation when the City must approve or disapprove a particular activity, as distinguished from situations where the City merely has to determine whether there has been conformity with applicable statutes, ordinances, or regulations. "Environmentally Sensitive Area" means an area designated as an "Area of Special Biological Significance" by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Region: Basin. Plan for the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties (1994) and amendments) or an area designated as an "Area of Ecological Significance by the County of Los Angeles" (Los Angeles County Significant Areas Study, Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning (1976) and amendments), or an area designated as a "Significant Natural Area" by the California Resources Agency, and as defined in the current version of the SUSMP approved by the Regional Board "Greater than (>) 9 unit home subdivision" means any subdivision being developed for 10 or more 10 single-family or multi -family dwelling units. "Hillside" means property located in an area with known erosive soil conditions, where the development contemplates grading on any natural slope that is twenty-five percent (25%) or greater. "Infiltration" means the downward entry of water into the surface of the soil. 12131\0002\617640.1 -2- "New Development" means land disturbing activities; structural- development, including construction or installation of a building or structure, creation of impervious surfaces; and land subdivision. "One Hundred Thousand (100,000). Square Foot Commercial Development" means any, Commercial Development that creates at least one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet of impermeable area, including parking areas. "Parking Lot" means land area or facility for the temporary parking or storage of motor. vehicles used personally, for business or for commerce with a lot size of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, or with twenty-five (25) or more parking spaces. "Redevelopment" means, on an already developed site, the creation or addition of at least five thousand (5,000) square feet of impervious surfaces or the creation or addition of fifty (50%) percent or more of impervious surfaces or the making of improvements to fifty (50%) percent or more of the existing structure, as such term is defined in the current version of the SUSMP approved by the Regional Board. Redevelopment includes, but is not limited to: (1) the expansion of a building footprint or addition or replacement of a structure; (2) structural development, :including an increase in gross floor area and/or exterior construction or remodeling; (3) replacement of impervious surface that is not part of a routine maintenance activity and (4) land disturbing activities related to structural or impervious surfaces. "Restaurant" means a stand-alone facility that sells prepared foods and drinks for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and refreshment stands selling prepared foods and drinks for immediate consumption. (SIC code 5812). "Retail Gasoline Outlet" means any facility engaged in selling gasoline and lubricating oils. "Source Control BMP" means any schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, managerial practices or operational practices that aim to prevent storm water pollution by reducing the potential for contamination at the source of pollution. "Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan" or "SUSMP" means the current version of the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan approved by the Regional Board, and on file in the office of the City Clerk of this City, and the NPDES Permit models that have been approved by the Executive Officer of the Regional Board for implementation to control storm water pollution from a New Development and Redevelopment or other project specifically identified in Section 8.44.095. "Storm Event" means a rainfall event that produces more than 0.1 inch of precipitation and that, which is separated from the previous storm event by at least 72 hours of dry weather. "Structural BMP" means any structural facility designed and constructed to mitigate the adverse impacts of storm water and urban runoff pollution (e.g. canopy, structural enclosure). The category may include both Treatment Control BMP's and Source Control BMP'S. 12131\0002\617640.1 -3- "Treatment" means the application of engineered systems that use physical, chemical, o biological processes to remove pollutants. Such processes include, but are not limited to, filtration, gravity settling, media adsorption, biodegradation, biological uptake, chemical oxidation and UV radiation. "Treatment Control BMP" means any engineered system designed to remove pollutants by simple gravity settling of particulate pollutants, filtration, biological uptake, media adsorption or any other physical, biological, or chemical process." Section 6: Chapter 8.44 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended by adding thereto a new Section 8.44.095 to readas follows: "8.44.095 Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan ("SUSMP") Requirements for New Development and Redevelopment Projects . a. Projects Requiring A SUSMP. The following New Development and Redevelopment project categories shall require a Storm Water Mitigation Plan which complies with the most recent SUSMP: 1. Single -Family Hillside Residences; 2. One Hundred Thousand (100,000) Square Foot Commercial Developments; 3. Automotive Repair Shops;. 4. Retail Gasoline Outlets 5. Restaurants; 6. Home Subdivisions with ten (10) to ninety-nine (99) housing units; 7. Home Subdivisions with one hundred (100) or more housing units; 8. Projects located within or directly adjacent to or discharging directly to an Environmentally Sensitive Area; and 9. Parking lots five thousand (5,000) square feet or more or with twenty-five (25) or more parking spaces and potentially exposed to storm water runoff. b. Incorporation of SUSMP Into Project Plans. An applicant for a New Development or a Redevelopment Project identified in paragraph a of this Section shall incorporate into the 12131\0002\617640.1 applicant's project plans a Storm Water Mitigation Plan which includes those Best Management, Practices necessary to control storm water pollution from construction activities and facility` operations, as set forth in the SUSMP applicable to the applicant's project. Structural or Treatment Control BMP's set forth in project plans shall meet the design standards set forth in the SUSMP. If a project applicant has included or is required to include Structural or Treatment Control BMP's in project plans, the applicant shall provide verification of maintenance provisions.. The verification shall include the applicant's signed statement, as part of its project application, accepting responsibility for all structural and treatment control BMP maintenance until such time, if any, the property is transferred. c. Issuance of Grading or Building Permits. No building or grading permit may be issued for any New Development or Redevelopment Project identified in paragraph a. of this Section until the Authorized Enforcement Officer confirms that either (1) the project plans comply with the applicable SUSMP requirements, or (2) compliance with the applicable SUSMP requirements is impracticable for one or more of the reasons set forth in paragraph e. regarding issuance of waivers. d. Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. As a condition for issuing a Certificate of Occupancy, the Authorized Enforcement Officer shall require facility operators and/or owners to build all the storm water pollution control Best Management Practices and Structural or Treatment Control BMP's that are shown on the approved project plans and to submit'a signed Certification Statement stating that the site and all Structural or Treatment Control BMP'S will be maintained in compliance with the SUSMP and other applicable regulatory requirements. e. . Granting of Waiver. The Authorized Enforcement Officer shall have the authority to grant a waiverto a Development or Redevelopment Project from the requirements of the SUSMP,.if impracticability for a specific property can be established by the project applicant. A waiver of impracticability may be granted only when all other Structural or Treatment Control BMP's have been considered and rejected as infeasible. Recognized situations of impracticability are limited to the following, unless approved by the Regional Board: 1. Extreme limitations of space for treatment on a Redevelopment project; 2. Unfavorable or unstable soil conditions at a site to attempt infiltration; and 3. Risk of ground water contamination because a known unconfined aquifer lies beneath the land surface or an existing or potential underground source of drinking water is less than ten (10) feet from the soil surface. f. Transfer of Properties Subject To Requirement For Maintenance of Structural and Treatment Control BMP's. 12131\0002\617640.1 1. The transfer or lease of a property subject to a requirement for maintenance of Structural and Treatment Control BMP's shall include conditions requiring the transferee and its successors and assigns to either (a) assume responsibility for maintenance of any existing Structural or Treatment Control BMP or (b) to replace an existing Structural or Treatment Control BMP with new control measures or BMP's meeting the then current standards of the City and the SUSMP. Such requirement shall be included in any sales or lease agreement or deed for such property. The condition of transfer shall include a provision that the successor property owner or lessee conduct maintenance inspections of all' Structural or Treatment Control BMP's at least once a year and retain proof of inspection. 2. For residential properties where, the Structural or Treatment. Control BMP's are located within a common area which will be maintained by a homeowner's association, language regarding the responsibility for maintenance shall be included in the project's conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC&R's). Printed educational materials will be required to accompany the first deed transfer to highlight the existence of the requirement and to provide information on what storm water management facilities are present, signs that maintenance is needed, and: how the necessary maintenance can be performed. The transfer of this information shall a so be required with any subsequent sale of the property. 3. If Structural or Treatment Control BMP'S are located within an area proposed for dedication to a public agency, they will be the responsibility of the developer until the dedication is accepted. g. Storm Water Abatement Fund. The Authorized Enforcement Officer shall collect from the project applicant thathas been granted a waiver an amount equaling the cost in savings from such waiver, as determined by the Authorized Enforcement Officer in accordance with the latest version of the SUSMP. Such collected funds shall be deposited in the Storm Water Pollution Abatement Fund, once established, to be used to promoteregional or alternative solutions for storm water pollution prevention. h. CEQA. Provisions of this section shall be complimentary to, 'and shall not replace, any applicable requirements for storm water mitigation required under the California Environmental Quality Act; ' Section 7. Section 8.44.150A1 of Chapter 8.44 of the. Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended to read as follows and all existing subparagraphs of Section 8.44.150A shall be renumbered accordingly. Any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of a. Any of the provisions of this Chapter; or b. Any failure to comply with any applicable requirement of either the SUSMP or an approved Storm Water Mitigation Plan with respect to a property; or 12131\0002\617640.1 c. Any failure to comply with any certification or verification provided by a project applicant or the applicant's successor in interest; or Any failure to properly operate and maintain any Structural or Treatment Control BMP on a property in accordance with an approved Storm Water. Mitigation Plan or the SUSMP, is hereby determined to be a threat to the public health, safety and welfare, is declared and deemed a public nuisance, and may be abated or restored by any Authorized Enforcement Officer, and a civil or criminal action to abate, enjoin or otherwise compel the cessation of such nuisance may be brought by the City Attorney." Section 8. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion; or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, portions, or phrases of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase without regard to whether any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, portion, or phrase of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2000. 12131\0002\617640.1 -7- August 3, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 8, 2000 AIRSPACE MONITORING SYSTEM (ASMS) PROPOSAL CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASING THE SYSTEM IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CITIES OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND REDONDO BEACH Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the,purchase of the Airspace Monitoring System, so long as there is equal participation from Rancho Palos Verdes and Redondo Beach, in the amount of $31,667.00; That the City Council direct the City Manager and City Attorney to coordinate the purchase of the ASMS with the other cities; and, That the City Council direct the City Manager to coordinate the site selection, installation and operation of the system, along with the other cities. Background: The Hermosa Beach Citizens Airport Advisory Committee and the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes and Redondo Beach have all received presentations on the ASMS. This system will allow tracking of aircraft operations in the area of the three cities involved:' This information can be retrieved and used to evaluate the compliance or violation of airspace rules by aircraft operation from LAX. This data would be the proof that would be used to effect either compliance, or by our attorneys to pursue a legal solution to any pattern of airspace violations. The City Attorney's office is working on whether or not the data from this system would be admissible in court. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes has authorized purchase of the system as long as both Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach agree to equally participate in the purchase and operation. Rancho Palos Verdes also has agreed to participate in the possible litigation. Redondo Beach is going to consider these issues at its meeting of August 15, 2000, The proposal is attached for your review.. The projected cost if $95,000: The City's share would be $31,667 for the purchase of the system. This assumes participation by all three cities. There will be some other costs associated with the installation and operation that, once known, would be needed. Those costs also would be shared and would be included in the three city agreement once the decision has been made to purchase by all of the participants. Respectfully submitted, Steph - R. urrell City Manager JUL-31-2000 03:56 PM P.O. Box 1841 Manhattan Beach CA 90267 310/968-0250 v2: k:^ >:t: -' •.aF' �xGG: • cFF' y <1C <: r5: �fk3:E: �i P opAral Overview repa-red for the South Bay Conunlulities. JUt_-.31-2000 03;57 PM -310 Airspace Monitoring System (ABMs) An Initial Proposal Overview #":ii:C:S:�ir. r.........................v.. s. n..vnrrr+r Precision Operations is pleased to offer the following overview to the South Bay Communities. The company principles have extensive experience in various aviation disciplines. Since 1990 our people have been regarded as the foremost authorities in airspace monitoring, tracking and data. acquisition. Our personnel have won awards from the United States Air Force, the Federal Aviation Administration, the San Fernando Valley Engineering Council and R&D Magazine. We feel certain that we can provide a valuable tool to the South Bay Conununities. • For many years, the South Bay has been at odds with the Los Angeles int national Airport and it's controlling agencies.. The situation has escalated to a level of mistrust and perceived deceit on the part of the local communities. Impartial and accurate data is hot readily available to the local communities, and the data that is made available has been filtered or edited. At present, the communities have no way to independently verify and log the aircraft arrival and departure routes that affect the local quality of life. Reports of routing errors from local residents must be forwarded to one of the airport controlling agencies for investigation. The agency is then placed in thc'position of choosing self condemnation or "creative interpretation" of the data for which they are the sole owners. In essence, the local communities must now ask the airport to provide data which "can and will be used 'against them". Quite often residents and officials are told that the aircraft aren't there, in direct contradiction to what was seen In plain view, but not reliably recorded. lye ASMS seeks to Solve two problems. First, the system will act as a watchdog for the local communities. Twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, the system will search the skies for any and all aircraft. The system will constantly evaluate and record the •routes being flown and instantly notify the users of any deviation from established and published routes. Unlike citizen groups, or video cameras, the system will operate around the clock and regardless of the weather providing an umbrella of coverage. • Second, the system will log and record all flights. all the time. This will allow review of overall operations, selected incidentsand investigation of alleged infractions. Output for the user is provided in both digital and hardcopy forms. Data is key to any negotiation. This system will give the leaders of the South Bay conununities volumes of data, allowing thein to speak, negotiate and plan with confidence, certainty and knowledge. Through testing and real -tine quality control, we will provide a level of utuuipugneable accuracy and validity. N � �.:i e is i.•mI:.JB�,iY>i YF As demonstrated, the effort for this project is greatly reduced through our use of previously . developed code and integration. The most complex portions of the software have already been written and have been in use for many years. We will -utilize this knowledge and expertise to reduce development risk, reduce development time and add confidence to the anticipated outcome. ASMS would add only additional tracking and display sofware to the existing systeuh. The development schedule would encompass six major milestones. The first milestone is the contract award. This signals the beginning of the effort and development begins. At this milestone, hardware is.now being purclkased for the system development effort. The second milestone is the display confidence milestone. At thirty days after contract signing, the system will display targets and trails over a geographic map. Real-time and/or simulated targets will [rack across the area with trails of one minute length behind them At this point. changes to the look and feel of the display may be made and would be incorporated into the next milestone. The third milestone is the alert confidence milestone. At forty-five days after contract signing, the systein will display alerts to genetic airspace areas. The system will display to the user the complete history of the offending track as welt as any pertinent information that has been obtained. At anis point, changes to the look and feel of thc alert display may be made and would be incorporated into the next milestone. The fourth milestone is the record and logging milestone. At sixty days after contract signing, the system will record all data, all alerts and create intrusion logs. Save for installation, optimization and testing, the.system development is complete. The fifth milestone is the installation and initial operation milestone.' At seventy-five days after contract signing, the system will be installed at the final location and will bt. operational. Development has been concluded and testing and optimization will now begin. Changes to the software will only be made to correct issues raised during testing. . . The sixth and final milestone is the final acceptance inspection. At ninety days after contract signing, all deliverables will be in your possession, including requirements specifications, JUL-31-2000 03:59 PM 310 III el 4190 operators manuals, training manuals, maintenance thanualsond testing reports. The system is complete and operational. Data collection has begun and the system has met all the requirements laid out for it and you can begin the next steps in yotir quest to improve the quality of life for the local residents. Additional improvements would be available at this time, including but not limited lo; Internet output, cable TV output, multiple user stations. These are not included in this proposal. Please note that alt dates are approximate and may change based on available work effort and sub -contractor deliver), of hardware. It is our goal to beat each and every one of these dates and to finish ahead of schedule'. Terms To protect all Forties. we propose an incrementally funded contract. The contract would be funded as follows", • 10% of the total contract value payable and due at the contract signing. • 25% oldie total contract due at display confidence milestone. • 25% of the total contract due at record and logging milestone. • 25% of the total contract due at initial operational milestone. • 15% of the total contract due at final acceptance inspection. P.04 Based on current understanding of the systein requirements,. the tot ! contract value is ninety- five thousand dollars ($95,000.00). This common development type contract ensures that the customer receives the product in a timely manner, and pays only for contract achievements. We feel this also keeps communication and dialogue open between all parties, benefiting the overall system development In approximately 90 days, you can begin independent verification and validation of any and all aircraft tracks throughout the south bay. We encourage a dialogue between all parties in seeking a solution that delivers a quality final product that will be beneficial and cost effective to all the residents. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City. Council Regular Meeting of August 8 2000 RESPONSE TO CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY RESIDENTS ON THE 4TH OF JULY Recommendation: That the City Council set a workshop meeting to hear concerns of residents and review revisions to ordinances: dealing with live bands, parties, etc.. Background: A number of residents have expressed concern about the number of large private parties that occurred on the 4th of July. In order for the City Council to hear these concerns and take action, it suggested that we hold a special workshop meeting on this issue. This will provide an opportunity to hear, first hand, the concerns and also explain the process used in enforcement, public education, etc.. Based on vacation. schedules, I would suggest that this workshop be held in the last week of August or first week of September: 1Qa [Federal Register: July 14, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 136)] [Notices] [Page 43802-43824] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr14jy00-117] Page 1 of 59 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration [Docket No.: 30109] Aviation Noise Abatement Policy 2000 AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Proposed policy document, Request for comments. SUMMARY: In 1976, the Department of Transportation published its Aviation Noise Abatement. Policy, which provided a course of action for reducing aviation noise .impact. The principles contained in that document and subsequent legislative and regulatory action have resulted in a dramatic reduction in the number of Americans adversely exposed to aviation noise. The changes in transportation use, public expectations, and technology warrant a review of the policy, which the Department is now undertaking. In particular, the Department is considering issuing a revised policystatement, which may extend to all forms of transportation noise, in order to provide direction to its efforts over the next 25 years. Although the 1976 policy document was signed by the Secretary of Transportation and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, the future document will be divided into two parts: first, the Secretary will publish a policy statement broadly addressing noise concerns. Based on this policy statement, the FAA Administrator will issue aviation noise policy guidelines. http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 Page 2 of 59 The issuance of this draft document on aviation noise abatement represents a first step in a process to develop an aviation noise policy. It is intended to stimulate ideas that will result in comments to the public docket. These comments will be evaluated, along with other inputs, in the development of a comprehensive policy statement and guidance document. This proposed FAA policy document reaffirms and incorporates the major tenets of the 1976 Aviation. Noise Abatement Policy and includes subsequent developments. It summarizes current conditions affecting aviation and sets forth goals, policies, and strategies for addressing them. This policy document also outlines the foundations and methodologies for assessing aviation noise, promoting research and development in aircraft noise reduction technology and noise abatement procedures, and promoting compatible usage of noise impacted lands. Finally, it presents a selective listing of reference materials that form the basis for the Federal Government's aviation noise policies. DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 28, 2000. ADDRESSES: Comments should be mailed in triplicate to: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket (AGC -200), Docket No. [30109], 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. Comments may be examined in the Rules Docket in Room 915G on weekdays between 8:30 a.m.: and 5:00 p.m., except on Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas L. Connor, Noise Division, AEE -100, Office of Environment and Energy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone, (202) 267- 8933; facsimile, (202) 267-5594. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Interested persons are invited to participate by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Comments should identify the regulatory docket or notice number and should be submitted in triplicate to the [[Page 43803]] Rules Docket address specified above. All comments received on or before the specified closing date for comments will be considered by the Administrator before taking action on this proposed policy. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in light of comments received.. All comments received will be available, both before andafter the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket, for examination by interested persons. A report summarizing each FAA public contact concerned with the substance of this document will be filed in the, docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm s/8/00 noise2 Page 3 of 59 comments submitted in response to this notice must include a preaddressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ' ` Comments to Docket No. xxxxx." The postcard will be date stamped and mailed to the commenter. Issued in Washington James D. Erickson, Director of Environment and Energy. FAA Aviation Noise Abatement Policy 2000 Section 1: Introduction DC on July 7, 2000. The first comprehensive aviation noise abatement policy was issued by the Secretary of Transportation and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on November 18, 1976. At that time, six to seven million Americans residing near airports were exposed to significant levels of aircraft noise --defined by FAA as those areas in which noise levels are Day -Night Average Sound Level (DNL) 65 dB or higher. Aircraft noise had become a growing problem in the 1960's with the introduction of jet aircraft and the rapidly increasing number of commercial aircraft operations in the United States. Aircraft noise, and its adverse impacts on residential and other noise. sensitive land uses, was recognized as a major constraint on the further development of the aviation system, threatening to limit the further construction and expansion of airports and ground access to, them. The 1976 Policy outlined a national effort under Federal leadership to reduceaircraft noise, with aircraft noise source reduction being a key component of the policy. The 1976 Policy has been highly successful. It hasguided actions over a period of almost 25 years that have substantially reduced aviation noise and its impacts. By the year 2000, the FAA estimates that there will be about 500,000 Americans exposed to significant levels of aircraft noise --down substantially from the six to seven million people exposed in 1976. Even as noise has been so dramatically reduced, the national aviation system, including the airport component of that system where aircraft noise is the most severe, has grown significantly in this last quarter of the century. As we stand at the threshold of the 21st century, the achievements realized from the 1976 Policy provide a solid foundation for the future. The successive phaseouts. of Stage 1 and Stage 2 aircraft are responsible for the larger component of the considerable success in reducing noise levels around the airports. With all civil turbojet aircraft heavier than 75,000 pounds now Stage 3 compliant, the most severe aircraft noise will be limited to within or very near the airport boundaries. The long-term outlook beyond 2000 is for a generally stable situation with respect to noise contours around airports, followed by http://www.southbaycities.org,/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 noise2 Page 4 of 59 further reduction as the result of advances in noise abatement technology and the replacement of hushkitted Stage 3 airplanes by built --as Stage 3 airplanes.. One of the cornerstones of the FAA's year 2000 aviation noise abatement policy is the continuation of aircraft source -noise reduction. The FAA is aggressively pursuing a variety of approaches, including source noise abatement technologies, with the goal of substantially reducing community noise exposure. In late 1999, the Secretary of Transportation supported this effort by announcing as one of his flagship initiatives the need for more stringent aircraft noise standards. The initiative states Promote the development of international certification noise standards for turbojet airplanes that will be more stringent than the current Stage 3 standards; and, develop models to assess new noise abatement technologies that will encourage introduction of quieter planes." The 21st century will offer opportunities for additional noise reduction not only from its source, through improved aircraft design, but also from other technological advances. New tools such as Global Positioning System (GPS) technology, which will be used for greater safety and efficiency of air transportation, will also be used to mitigate noise by keeping aircraft tightly within their designated noise corridors. Noise abatement flight procedures are constantly evolving with advances in technology,improved aircraft design, and more refined airspace management procedures. State-of-the-art navigational technology will enable us to refine the ability to define, and the pilot's ability to fly, flight tracks with increased precision in the vicinity of noise sensitive areas. The continued development of aviation growth is a vital element of U.S. transportation, and the aviation industry is, in turn, a powerful generator of economic activity and jobs within communities. Notwithstanding anticipated technological improvements, aircraft noise will remain and will be a pivotal quality -of -life issue. While the number of Americans exposed to significant levels of aviation noise has been dramatically reduced since the 1976 Policy was issued, a large number of people still remain so impacted. Furthermore, even as Americans stimulate aviation growth by their increased air travel, they also express an ever-increasing desire for a quieter neighborhood environment. As significant noise around the Nation's airports is dramatically reduced, people will direct more attention to the lower but still annoying noise levels. Unless aircraft noise is addressed with purpose and vigor, it will likely become a potential impediment to the robust airport and aviation system growth and operation that will be needed as public demand for access to aviation services continues ,to .grow. The FAA continues to place great emphasis on reducing the number of persons residing in areas of significant noise exposure around airports. Each airport with areas of significant noise exposure outside its boundary is encouraged to evaluate its current and projected noise levels, and to develop a program that both reduces the number of persons significantly impacted by noise, and prevents new noncompatible development from occurring. This may be http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm a/8/00 Page 5 of 59 accomplished through either the Federal voluntary airport noise compatibility planning process, with FAA technical and financial assistance, 'or through a locally -determined process. Community involvement is a critical part of airport noise compatibility planning. It serves to provide input on noise mitigation measures that are the most desirable to airport neighbors,while informing the public of the technical and reasonable limits to noise reduction: Noise relief continues to be a shared responsibility, as described in the 1976 Policy. The FAA and the aviation industry have the primary responsibility to address aircraft source noise, technological advances, and air traffic procedures. Airport proprietors, State and local governments, and citizens have the primary responsibility to address airport noise compatibility planning and local land use planning and zone. The airport operator must be [[Page. 43804]] involved in local, land use planning and control efforts on a continuing basis. The 1976 Policy encouraged airport proprietors and others to consult with FAA about their plans and proposals and to suggest innovative ways to meet the noise problem, in their communities. Airport proprietors were encouraged to consult and review proposals to restrict use with airport users and the- FAA before implementation. FAA advised airports so that ' ' uncoordinated and unilateral restrictions at various individual airports do notwork separately or in combination to create an undue burden on foreign or interstate commerce, unjustly discriminate, or conflict with FAA's statutory authority." This policy foreshadowed the national noise policy announced by the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990. (ANCA). Citing similar concerns, the Act, among other things, established a national program for review of airport Noise and access restriction proposals. At the time of the 1976 Policy, before the phaseout of Stage 1, there was limited potential for effective control of the sizeable land area subjected to significant noise levels. Land use solutions were to a large extent beyond the reach of local affected communities until effective aircraft source noise reduction was implemented. However, with -the year 2000 phaseout of Stage 2, compatible land use has become a viable, effective, and necessary solution. Withthe vast reduction in land area that is significantly impacted by aviation noise, the major actions needed at the beginning of the 2000's decade to achieve and maintain noise compatibility around airports are land use and developmental actions outside the airport boundary appropriate to the airport's remaining and future noise. The Federal Government generally does notcontrol land use --zoning authority is reserved to the States and their subdivisions. The FAA has established a compatible land use initiative program to encourage and guide State and local governments having land use control authority, to exercise that authority in a http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 way that serves both the airport and the community. Jurisdictions are particularly urged to refrain from permitting noise sensitive land uses to develop ever closer to airports as the Stage 2 phaseout shrinks their noise contours. In some communities, it may be possible to establish a broad noise buffer beyond areas of significant noise exposure, between the airport and the community, where noise sensitive land uses would either be prohibited or remediated in some way. Noise buffers are subject to determinations of local feasibility and decisions. The FAA will respect and support such locally established buffers. Beyond the airports' environs, with responsible airspace management and safety being the first consideration, the FAA's goal is to design prospective air traffic routes and procedures to minimize noise consistent with local consensus. The FAA will carefully review the noise impact of prospective changes to air traffic routes and procedures on communities and, in response to requests, will consider alternatives to minimize noise sensitive areas as described above. Locations with unique noise sensitivities in national parks, national wildlife refuges, and other Federally managed areas merit and will receive special consideration as FAA manages the navigable airspace and evaluates aviation actions that raise noise concerns for these areas. The 1976 Policy initiated the first pilot program under which the Federal government funded up to 25 airport noise control plans a year. That modest beginning was expanded in the 1980's and 1990's by legislation and policies. By the end of the century, the FAA had issued Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants for over $2.6 billion from an earmarked noise set-aside. Since the statutory establishment of the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) program in 1990, the FAA has approved PFC collection at commercial service airports exceeding $1.6 billion for noise mitigation projects. Additional AIP funding is provided to mitigate the noise impact of airport expansion projects. In addition to these Federal administered funds, airports finance substantial noise mitigation with locally generated funds. U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) policy on airport rates and charges identifies aircraft noise abatement and mitigation as an environmental cost recoverable through fees charged to air carriers for the use of airport facilities and services. All funding sources must be used responsibly to ensure continuing strong financial support for noise mitigation, including exploration of innovative financing and creative public/private partnerships. In summary, the FAA's year 2000 aviation noise abatement goals are the following: Page 6 of 59 Continue to reduce aircraft noise at its source. Use new technologies to mitigate noise impacts. http://www.southbayeities.orWdocs/noise.htm 8/8/00 Bring existing land uses into compatibility with levels of significant noise exposure around airports, and prevent the development of new noncompatible uses in these areas. Design prospective air traffic routes and procedures to minimize aviation noise impacts in areas beyond legal jurisdiction of airport proprietors, consistent with local consensus and safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace. Provide special consideration to locations in national parks and other Federally managed areas having unique noise sensitivities: Ensure strong financial support for noise compatibility planning and for mitigation projects. This document is comprised of five sections plus an appendix of references, with this introduction being Section 1. Section 2 is the heart of the policy, and outlines FAA's noise goals and policies, witha brief discussion of each policy element. Section 3 describes the legal and regulatory framework governing aviation noise and the shared responsibilities of all those who must act in complementary ways to mitigate the noise problem --government, aviation, and private citizens. Section 4 presents the FAA's' methods and . standards for measuring and assessing noise impacts, which are derived from scientific research and a series of Federal interagency committee reviews. Section 5 provides greater detail on aircraft source noise reduction, history, research, and future prospects. As stated previously, the 1976 Policy has served the nation well. This comprehensive update to that Policy seeks to build upon ANCA and meet the challenges of the first part of the 21st century. It is a task that must be shared by government at all levels, by the aviation industry, and by citizens. Solutions depend on technological advances, solid airport noise compatibility programs, strong land use commitments, noise -responsible airspace management, and adequate financial resources. Section 2: Goals and Policies This section is the heart of the Aviation Noise Abatement Policy. It outlines FAA's noise goals and policies, and provides a brief discussion of each element. This policy fully incorporates and amplifies, clarifies, and supplements the 1976 Policy, based upon our experience and changing needs. 2.1 Aviation Noise Goals Since it was issued, the 1976 Policy has successfully guided actions on civil aviation noise in the United States. To keep pace with changing technology and the projected growth in aircraft operations, the FAA must set realistic and achievable aviation noise goals, and [[Page 43805]] http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm. 8/8/00 Page 8 of 59 develop new policies to support the safety and efficiency of the National Airspace System (NAS) while seeking to minimize the adverse impacts of aviation noise on people and the environment. Building on past successes in the area of aviation noise, the FAA's goals are to: Goal 1: Continue to reduce aircraft noise at the source The successive phaseouts of noisier Stage 1 and Stage 2 aircraft have been largely responsible for the considerable reduction in the number of persons exposed to significant levels of aircraft noise in the United States. Ongoing research and development programs by FAA, NASA, and industry to develop quieter aircraft, combined with regulatory action by FAA will result in achievable future reductions in the number of persons exposed to significant levels of aircraft noise. Goal 2: Use new technologies to mitigate noise impacts New technologies bring with them the challenge to integrate noise planning and mitigation into their deployment. GPS, automated flight guidance, free flight, and other innovations will all be examined for their potential to mitigate noise impacts while improving safety and efficiency. Goal 3: Encourage development of compatible land uses in areas experiencing significant noise exposure around airports, to the extent feasible, and prevent the development of new non -compatible uses in these areas In the year 2000, there will still be an estimated 500,000 Americans residing in areas of significant noise exposure. A top priority for 2000 and beyond will be to achieve compatibility in these areas. It is important that there be a corresponding emphasis on protecting these gains by preventing new noise sensitive land uses from becoming established in these areas, through stronger State and local land use commitments. The FAA's airport noise compatibility program and compatible land use --have and will continue to support this goal.Goal 4: Design air traffic routes and procedures to minimize aviation noise impacts in areas beyond the legal jurisdiction of the airport proprietor, consistent with local consensus and safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace The trend in recent decades has been a growing expectation by Americans of continuing environmental improvement, including a quieter noise environment. In the airport environs, State and local jurisdictions are strongly encouraged to prevent noise sensitive land uses from developing ever more closely to airports as noise contours shrink with the transition to an all Stage 3 fleet. Creating an extra margin of noise buffer outside significant noise exposure areas is possible for some communities, and locally -established buffers will be supported and respected by the FAA --where a community has adopted and implemented noise http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 ' noise2 Page 9 of 59 standards which are more stringent than FAA's noise compatibility standards, FAA will respect those local standards in its actions which could cause growth of the airport's noise contours, through appropriate mitigation actions. Goal 5: Provide specific consideration to locations in national parks and other .Federally. managed areas having unique noise sensitivities The American heritage is enriched with national parks, national wildlife refuges, and other Federally managed areas containing locations with unique noise sensitivities. These locations merit specific noise considerations as the FAA manages the navigable airspace and evaluates other aviation actions.Goal6: Ensure strong financial support for noise compatibility planning and for mitigation projects The 1976 Policy openedthe door to Federal funding of local noise abatement planning and programs. That modest beginning has since grown into a sizeable noise set aside in Airport Improvement Program funding, and was joined in the 1990s by the use of Passenger Facility Charges and more substantial contributions from airport revenues to fund noise mitigation. Future reliable sources of funding are vital, including the exploration of innovative finance programs and ;public/private partnerships to accelerate adequate financing of noise mitigation projects. 2.2 Aviation Noise Policies The seven elements comprising FAA's policies to achieve the aviation noise goals outlined above are as follows: 1. The FAA will aggressively pursue the development and prescription of a new generation of more stringent noise standards and regulations in order to protect. public health and welfare. 2. The FAA will examine new operational technologies for their potential to mitigate noise impacts while maximizing aviation system efficiencies. 3. The FAA will carefully review the noise impacts of prospective changes to air traffic routes and procedures and, in response to requests, will consider - alternative actions to minimize noise impacts for residents of communities surrounding airports and for noise sensitive areas that are outside the airport proprietor's legal area of interest. 4. The FAA will encourage airport proprietors, in consultation with airport users, local planning officials, and the interested public, to implement airport noise compatibility programs that will reduce existing noncompatible land uses around airports, and prevent new noncompatible uses. http://www.southbaycities.orgidocs/noise.htm Page 10 of59 5. As requested, the FAA will assist State and local governments and planning agencies in establishing policies and practices to minimize noise sensitive land uses around airports, including locally determined buffers outside areas of significant noise exposure. 6. The FAA will take into account the specific circumstances of locations in. national parks and other Federally managed areas with unique noise sensitivities in managing the navigable airspace and evaluating proposed FAA actions that raise aviation noise concerns. 7. The FAA will continue strong support for noise compatibility planning and noise mitigation projects with financial programs under its jurisdiction, with airport rates and charges policy, and by encouraging innovative funding mechanisms including creative public/private partnerships. 2.3 Discussion of Noise Policy Elements The above seven elements that together comprise the FAA's year 2000 aviation noise abatement policy are brieflydiscussed by number in the remainder of this section. Policy Element 1: Aircraft Source Noise Reduction The FAA will aggressively pursue the developmentand prescription of a new generation of more stringent noise standards and regulations in order to protect public health and welfare. Discussion: Although the reductions in noise impacted populations and the reductions in new noncompatible uses resulting from the airport noise compatibility program have been significant, over the last quarter century the reduction of aircraft noise at its source has provided the greater amount of noise relief to the public. The FAA has a long-standing commitment to achieve increasingly effective source noise reduction and, in accordance with the Secretary of Transportation's [[Page 43806]] flagship initiative, is aggressively pursuing the development of even more stringent noise standards. In 1968, the FAA first began developing noise certification standards, initially for measuring and later for limiting aircraft source noise. These certification standards, which paralleled technological improvements in airplane engine design, were codified as 14 CFR Part 36 (Part 36). Effective December 1, 1969, Part 36 set limits on noise emissions of large turbojet aircraft of new design by. establishing Stage 2 certification standards. http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm noise2 Page 11 of 59 The Noise Control Act of 1972 (49 U.S.C. 44709, 44715) gave the FAA broader authority to set limits for aircraft source noise. Using this authority, the FAA established more stringent Stage 3 standards in Part 36, set limits on source noise for all newly produced airplanes, and required in 14 CFR Part 91 (Part 91) the phaseout of Stage 1 turbojet aircraft over 75,000 pounds by January 1, 1985. Stage 3 Transition The Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (ANCA) required the phased elimination of Stage 2 turbojet airplanes weighing more than 75,000 pounds operating in the contiguous United States. After December 31, 1999, civil turbojet airplanes over 75,000 pounds must be Stage 3 compliant to operate within the contiguous 48 states. To bring about the earliest feasible reduction of noise levels, interim compliance deadlines of 1994, 1996, and 1998 were established in the general operating rules (Part 91, Subpart 1). The Stage 2 phaseout regulations required all operators of affected airplanes to report compliance progress to the FAA on an annual basis. The regulations also provided separate criteria for interim and final compliance waivers. As prescribed in the ANCA, a final compliance waiver could only be granted to a domestic air carrier that had achieved a fleet mix of at least 85 percent Stage 3 airplanes by July 1, 1999 --no waiver may extend beyond December 31, 2003. The benefits of the Stage 3 transition will continue to accrue after completion of the Statutory compliance process. Newly manufactured Stage 3 aircraft are quieter than their predecessors, and significantly quieter than older hushkitted Stage 3 airplanes. Even with substantial growth in operations, noise contours around many U.S. airports will continue to shrink as hushkitted and older Stage 3 airplanes reach the end of their service lives and are replaced by newer airplanes: Source Noise Research In early 1992, the FAA and NASA began co-sponsorship of a multiyear program focused on achieving significant advances in noise reduction technology. In October 1992, Congress reinforced this effort by mandating that the FAA and NASA jointly conduct an aircraft noise reduction research program with the goal, of developing technologies for subsonic jet aircraft to operate at reduced noise levels. The goal �f this program is to identify noise reduction technology to reduce the community noise impacts of future subsonic airplanes by 10 dB (relative to 1992 technology) by the year 2001. Based on the progress in this program and in fulfillment of its legislative mandate, the FAA plans to amend aircraft noise standards and regulations during the first decade of the century to take advantage of feasible noise reduction technologies: In addition, the FAA is supporting NASA's proposal to extend the research program in order to reach the enabling technology goals in its own http://wwvv.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 Aeronautics & Space Transportation Technology: Three Pillars for Success" program.: Working closely with industry, government, and academia, NASA has set bold goals to sustain U.S. leadership in civil aeronautics and space. The goals are grouped into Three Pillars: ' :`Global Civil Aviation," Revolutionary Technology Leaps, and ' 'Access to Space." Included among the ten enabling technology goals of the program is ' ' Environmental Compatibility." Its noise goal is to reduce the perceived noise levels of future aircraft by a factor of two by 2007 and by a factor of four by 2022, compared to 1995 technology. This effort could result in even greater aircraft source noise reductions. The FAA is also a major participant on an ICAO Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP) technical working group that is formulating proposals for an increase in stringency of the international noise standard for subsonic jetand large propeller -driven airplanes. The FAA plans to set new Stage 4 standards by early in the next century. New standards would result in a future timed transition to a generation of airplanes quieter. than Stage 3, similar to source -noise reduction transitions that have been implemented since the 1976 Policy. Future Supersonic Transport (SST) Airplanes With respect to future SST airplanes, specific noise standards have not yet been established.. The FAA anticipates that any future standards for SST airplanes would be proposed so as to produce no greater noise impact on a community than a subsonic airplane certified to Stage 3 noise limits. Accordingly, the Stage 3 noise limits prescribed in Part 36 for subsonic airplanes may be used as guidelines for developing any future SST airplanes. This policy is consistent with Chapter 4 of the International Civil Aviation Organization's Annex 16, Volume 1, which states that Chapter 3 (equivalent to Stage 3) noise levels` applicable to subsonic airplanes may be used as guidelines for future SST airplanes. Any provisions for noise certification of future SST airplanes will give consideration, to the extent possible, to the unique operational flight characteristics of future SST designs. Policy Element 2: New Operational Technologies The FAA will examine new operational technologies for their potential to mitigate noise impacts while maximizing aviation system efficiencies. Discussion: The National Airspace System (NAS) is the infrastructure within which aviation operates in the United States. The NAS includes airports, automated flight service stations, air traffic control towers, terminal radar control facilities, and en route air traffic control centers. The FAA continually seeks to improve various aspects of the NAS. In 1996, the FAA began to develop a NAS modernization plan to define what the aviation system of the future would look like and how it would be implemented. This plan --termed the NAS architecture --is a collaborative effort between the FAA and the aviation http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 Page 13 of 59 community. Several NAS modernization programs have the potential to influence aviation noise. GPS Augmentation It appears that the principal navigation system for the 21st century will be based upon the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). The Global Positioning System (GPS) provides a practical starting point foreventual development of the GNSS, but will not totally satisfy all civil aviation requirements for navigation and landing. For use in civil aviation, augmentations are required to improve GPS accuracy for precision approaches, provide integrity and continuity for all phases of flight, and provide availability necessary to meet radio navigation requirements. These GPS augmentations are being implemented incrementally. [[Page 43807)] The first augmentation being developed in the United States is the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS). The WAS is a safety -critical navigation system that will provide a quality of positioning information never before available to the aviation community. It is a geographically expansive augmentation to the basic GPS service. The WAAS improves the accuracy, integrity, and availability of the basic GPS signals. When fully implemented, this system will allow GPS to be used as a primary navigation system from departure through Category I precision approach. The wide area of coverage for this system includes the entire United States and portions of Canada and Mexico. WAAS will be deployed in phases. The final operating capability will satisfy enroute through Category I precision approach capability requirements for using GPS/WAAS as the only radio navigation aid. Another augmentation to the GPS signal being developed in the United States is the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS). The LAAS is intended to complement the WAAS.: Together, the two systems will supply users of the NAS with seamless satellite based navigation for all phases of flight. In practical terms, this means that at locations` where the WAAS is unable to meet existing navigation and landing requirements, the. LAAS will fulfill those requirements. The LAAS will meet the more stringent Category II/III requirements that exist at selected locations throughout the United States. The LAAS will be implemented in stages, with full completion expected in 2006. When fully implemented, these WAAS and LAAS enhancements to the GPS will permit greater precision in directing aircraft operations than currently is available. The FAA anticipates that this increased precision will permit the refinement of procedures, particularly airport approaches and departures, to abate aircraft noise and minimize exposure levels in noise sensitive areas. Automated Flight Guidance http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 Automated flight guidance capabilities have steadily increased and improved with time. Air carrier crews now routinely use autoflight features that are operational during takeoff and landing. An Auto Flight Guidance System (AFGS) includes featuressuch as an autopilot, autothrottles, displays, and controls that are interconnected in such a manner as to allow the crew to automatically control the aircraft's lateral and vertical flight path and speed. A flight management system (FMS) is sometimes associated with an AFGS. An FMS is an integrated system used by flight crews for flight planning, navigation, performance management, aircraft guidance and flight progress monitoring. Some aircraft now have automated features identified for operations specifically at low altitudes --for noise abatement --which when used, contribute to performance, workload, cost, noise, and safety benefits. Such features are certificated on the aircraft by either type certification or supplemental type certification. Free Flight The introduction of technologies such as GPS and Auto Flight Guidance allows; the future NAS Architecture to be built on a concept ofair traffic management called ' free flight." This concept is predicated on greater sharing of information between pilots and air traffic' controllers to facilitate air traffic management. It is designed to permit aircraft operators to select their own routes as alternatives to the published preferred instrument flight rule (IFR) routes, thereby removing the constraints currently imposed on these users. By. providing increased controller -planning support through decision support tools, pilots will be permitted to select the most direct, cost-effective routes between takeoff and landing. As traffic density increases however, the free flight concept calls for structured flow. The same tools that provide flexibility en route and in low-density traffic areas will also help ensure the most efficient flow within a highly structured airspace such as a terminal area. Free flight is being implemented incrementally. Many of the tools necessary to achieve free flight are currently available; others are still being developed. Enhanced satellite navigation will significantly enhance free flight capability. Full implementation will occur as procedures are modified and technologies become available and are acquired by users and service providers. The dispersal of aircraft at higher altitudes because of free flight can reduce lower -Level noise exposure on the ground. At lower altitudes, such as when approaching and departing airports, it would normally be more desirable to concentrate flights (and noise) over those areas least sensitive to noise rather than dispensing the aircraft. Here, free flight's technology may also have applicability to landing, takeoff, and lower altitude flight tracks, by safely concentrating aircraft into narrowly defined corridors which have been protected from noise sensitive development and helping them to avoid the more noise sensitive land areas. Policy Element 3: Air Traffic Procedures http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 The FAA will carefully review the noise impact of prospective changes to air traffic routes and procedures and in designing these changes will consider. actions to minimize noise impacts for residents of communities surrounding airports and for noise sensitive areas that are outside the airport proprietor's legal area of interest consistent with safety, efficiency, and local consensus. Discussion: By law, the FAA has the sole authority to establish flight operational procedures and to manage the air traffic control system and navigable airspace in the United States. The FAA is responsible for evaluating actions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The FAA's environmental goal is to make and implement air traffic decisions that minimize the noise and other environmental impacts on residential and other noise sensitive areas, consistent with the highest standards of aviation safety and the need for effective and efficient air traffic management. FAA's Community Involvement Policy ensures that FAA will seek andconsider community input before making decisions that affect the public. This policy emphasizes active, early, and continuous communication with affected members of the public throughout the NEPA process. Airspace Changes The basic structure of the airspace has not changed appreciably over the last ten years. However, in that decade aircraft, navigation aides, and technology in general have advanced by several generations. Free flight has been established as the key direction for the evolution of the NAS. Airspace is a major component of the free flight concept. These advances create the need to redesign the airspace to meet evolving needs: Changes in airspace configuration, architecture, or structure will have implications for air traffic control, air traffic management, the user community, and the environment. The FAA's policy is to ensure appropriate consideration ofnoise impacts in decisions on airspace changes, together with safety, technical, and economic factors. The FAA has developed the Integrated. Noise Model (INM), a computerized modeling tool widely used by the civilian aviation community for evaluating aircraft noise impacts in the airport environs. The FAA is developing the Noise Integrated Routing System (NIRS), a computerized [[Pa9e 43808]] research tool for assessing the environmental impacts of air traffic actions beyond the airport environs, up to 18,000 feet above ground level (AGL). NIRS adapts the noise data and algorithms from the INM for use in an air traffic design system. The program requires integration. with air traffic models which contain the routes and events used to assess delay, capacity, and workload. NIRS provides airspace planners with environmental noise screening assessments for airspace design changes encompassing a wide area. NIRS http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 Page 16 of 59 allows an airspace design team to perform noise evaluations concurrently with. other modeling requirements. The enables the same routes, procedures and events used in delay/capacity analyses to be used in the relatedenvironmental analyses. Predicted noise levels over noise sensitive areas for both existing and alternative scenarios are modeled, and a change of exposure criteria is used to determine if the proposes action is likely to be controversial on environmental grounds. If controversy is anticipated, FAA may use NIRS to identify alternatives or mitigation. Whenever practicable in designing routes and procedures, the FAA seeks to identify and avoid environmentally sensitive areas and to minimize noise effects when such areas cannot reasonably be avoided. Noise Abatement in the Airport Environs Most noise impacts related to air traffic procedures are in the airport environs where aircraft operate in the closest proximity to people and homes. FAA requires an environmental assessment for new or revised procedures which would route air traffic over noise sensitive areas at less than 3,000 feet above ground level (AGL). Where runway use, flight procedure, or air traffic changesare not necessary for operational. reasons, but are proposed for noise abatement reasons, the FAA relies on airport proprietors to submit requests for such changes. Airport proprietors are the appropriate initiators of such noise abatement proposals because of the liability they bear for noise impacts in the airport environs: Noise abatement proposals are submitted to the FAA by airport proprietors in a variety of ways, including recommendations in airport noise compatibility programs. The airport proprietor and the FAA both have roles in environmental review and affording opportunities for public participation for proposed air traffic changes in the airport environs. FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 91.53A, Noise Abatement Departure Profiles (NADP), provides standards for noise abatement departure procedures for subsonic turbojet -powered airplanes with maximum certificated takeoff weights exceeding 75,000 pounds. The AC provides guidance for selecting the most effective procedures for specific airport environments, while standardizing those choices within a practical number of options in order to increase the margin of safety by superseding a growing number of unique, airport -specific practices. AC 91-53A provides two standard departure procedures, one to benefit noise sensitive communities that are the closest to the airport, and one to benefit more distant noise sensitive communities. It does not mandate the selection of either the AC's close -in or distant NADP. Rather, it allows discretion to select either of the NADPs described in the AC or to use the standard NADP in 14 CFR 25.111(a). In some cases, local communities seek assurance that certain air traffic procedures will remain in place in perpetuity for noise abatement reasons. http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm '•1 noise2 Page 17 of 59 Airport proprietors do not have the authority to make air traffic commitments for the FAA because of Federal preemption of airspace use and management. Airport proprietors do have the discretion to assure communities that they will not in the future request the FAA to make any procedural changes at the airport for noise abatement purposes that differ from the procedures at issue. Consistent with its policy, the FAA does not initiate noise abatement procedural changes absent an airport proprietor's request and would only consider changes on its own initiative necessary to assure the highest standards of safety and efficiency in the use of the navigable airspace. The FAA will make every possible effort to maintain noise abatement procedures that have the community's support. However, unforeseen future circumstances may render current procedures untenable for airspace safety and efficiency, and the FAA cannot abrogate its airspace responsibility in local agreements. It is also possible that future circumstances may render today's noise abatement procedures unnecessary or less desirable from a noise standpoint than alternative arrangements, resulting in local decisions to revisit them. Changesin air traffic procedures that have potentially significant noise impacts on communities surrounding an airport require preparation of an environmental assessment or impact statement. Beyond the Airport Environs Beyond the airport environs, aircraft following air traffic routes and procedures normally do not significantly influence the noise environment of underlying land uses. Air traffic procedures for operations over 3,000 feet AGL are normally categorically: excluded from FAA environmental assessment requirements. At the same time, in recognition that some actions that are normally categorically excluded can behighly controversial on environmental grounds, the FAA has developed the Air Traffic Noise Screening Model (ATNS), which allows air traffic specialists and planners to evaluate potential noise impacts from proposed air traffic changes. The ATNS can evaluate proposed changes in arrival and departure procedures between 3,000 and ;18,000 feet AGL for large civil jet aircraft weighing over 75,000 pounds. Where a proposed change would cause an increase in noise of DNL 5 dB or greater, FAA considers whether there are extraordinary circumstances warranting preparation of an environmental assessment. Where air traffic changes are not necessary for operational purposes, the FAA is willing in the appropriate circumstances to consider changes for noise abatement reasons for communities at greater distances from airports that are outside the airport proprietor's legal area of interest and already at noise levels consistent with Federal land use compatibility guidelines. In these cases, proposed changes must first be consistent with safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace, and also reflect local consensus. Final decisions will then reflect the FAA policy that operational changes made for noise abatement reasons must reduce the number of people affected by noise and the severity of http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm, s/s/00 Page 18 of 59 the effect, without increasing noise effects in naturalenvironments with unique noise sensitivities: Overflights of Noise Sensitive Areas The FAA Advisory Circular 91-36C, VisualFlight Rules (VFR) Flight Near Noise Sensitive Areas, identifies 2,000 feet AGL as the minimum recommended altitude for overflights of noise sensitive areas when aircraft are not landing at or taking off from an airport. It identifies typical noise sensitive areas to include: outdoor assemblies, churches, hospitals, schools, nursing homes, residential areas designated as sensitive by airports, and units of the National Park System. Consistent with aviation safety and efficiency, the FAA will actively assist [[Page 43809]] other agencies in seeking the voluntary cooperation of operators with regard to the 2,000 feet AGL minimum altitude advisory. This assistance includes proposals for regulation of low-flying fixed -wing airplanes, helicopters, ultralight vehicles, balloons, and gliders.. Policy Element 4: Airport Noise Compatibility Planning The FAA will encourage airport proprietors, in consultation with airport users, local planning officials, and the interested public, to implement airport noise compatibility programs that will minimize aviation noise impacts, reduce existing noncompatible land uses around airports, and prevent new noncompatible uses. Discussion: Airport noise compatibility planning is the primary tool used by -many airport proprietors and local officials to minimize aviation noise impacts'in the vicinity of airports. Airport noise compatibility planning involves an evaluation of an airport's existing and future noise exposure, the selection of effective measures to reduce noise and noncompatible land uses, and the implementation of those measures. The measures to be implemented are analyzed in a document called an airport noise compatibility program (NCP). The FAA has provided technical and financial support for airport noise compatibility planning since 1976. FAA's current program derives;from the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 (ASNA), implemented through 14 CFR Part 150 (Part 150) in 1985. ASNA directed the FAA to establish by regulation a single system for measuring aircraft noise exposure, to identify land uses that are normally compatible with various noise exposure levels, and to receive voluntary submissions of noise exposure maps and noise compatibility programs from airport proprietors. Airport sponsors who prepare noise exposure mapsare immune from certain future liability for noise damages. After preparing the map, airport operators may prepare noise http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 noise2 Page 19 of 59 compatibility programs. These programs contain measures that an airport operator plans to take to reduce existing or prevent the development of new noncompatible land uses in the area covered by the noise exposure map. Airport sponsors must consult affected parties and provide the opportunity for a public hearing. Airport proprietor participation in airport noise compatibility planning is voluntary. Over 230 airports are participating in the program and 193 airports have FAA approved NCPs in place--thisincludes about two-thirds of our busiest commercial airports: Airport noise compatibility planning addresses both existing and future aviation noise impacts. Noise exposure maps use noise contours to depict the extent of existing and future noise exposure within the community and the location of noise sensitive land uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, churches) within the contours. Knowledge of future noise exposure provides a basis for long-term local planning and investment in noise mitigation for particular noise sensitive areas, including how to compatibly develop any vacant land or to redevelop older urban areas around airports into compatible uses. Based on the noise exposure maps, strategies are developed and evaluated to reduce noise exposure and noncompatible land uses around an airport: Noise solutions are airport -specific --no two airports are alike in their noise and land use environments. The best solutions for one airport may not be effective or desirable in another location. ASNA makes the airport proprietor responsible for airport noise compatibility planning, including selecting the specific noise abatement and mitigation measures deemed appropriate for inclusion in the airport noise compatibility program. The FAA reviews airport noise compatibility programs submitted by airport proprietors under Part 150 for consistency with criteria established by law and regulation. Program measures must be reasonably consistent with the goals of reducing existing noncompatible land uses around the airport and of preventing the introduction of additional noncompatible land uses. Program measures must not derogate safety or adversely affect the safe and efficient use of airspace. Program measures must not impose an undue burden on interstate or foreign commerce. Program measures must not be unjustly discriminatory or violate other airport grant agreement assurances. Program measures should be designed to meet both local needs and needs of the nationalair transportation systema Finally, program measures must be consistent with all of the powers and responsibilities of the FAA Administrator. The FAA is directed by law to approve airport noise compatibility programs that meet the specified criteria. The FAA may request that an airport proprietor consider additional or alternative program measures, but the FAA does not have the authority to substitute its judgment for that of the airport proprietor regarding which measures to select for implementation. The FAA may only approve or disapprove program measures recommended by an airport proprietor in accordance with established statutory and regulatory criteria. If an airport http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 noise compatibility program is not acted on by the FAA within the statutory 180 -day timeframe, it is automatically approved by law with the exception of flight procedures. Flight procedures are, not subject to automatic approval. Although the FAA has established, under ASNA and Part 150, a uniform system for measuring the noise in and around airports, the responsibility for determining the acceptable and permissible land uses and the relationship between specific properties and specific noise contours rests with the local authorities. In preparing noise compatibility programs, airport sponsors may support the use of state and local land use compatibilityy standards more stringent than Federal guidelines. If an airport proprietor proposes an airport noise and access restriction subject to the requirements of 14 CFR Part 161 (Part 161), the FAA encourages the proprietor to integrate the required Part 161 analysis into a Part 150 planning process which first analyzesnonrestrictive, measures to mitigate noise, and then analyzes the proposed restriction. For Stage 2 restrictions, which are not subject to FAA approval under Part 161, the FAA advises airport proprietors who have integrated a Part 161 analysis into. a Part 150 study to await the FAA's determinations under Par 150 before -adopting the restriction. FAA's Part 150 determinations may provide valuable insight regarding the proposed restriction's consistency with existing laws and the positionof the FAA with respect to the restriction: Stage 3 restrictions are subject to either formal agreement among airport users or to FAA approval under Part 161; If an airport proprietor integrates a Stage 3 restriction proposal and analysis into a Part 150 program, the proprietor may submit a combined Part 150/Part 161 submission to the FAA, as provided for in the Part 161 regulation. The FAA will evaluate the proposed Stage 3 restriction under Part 161 requirements in addition to evaluating the submission under Part 150 requirements, Effective airport noise compatibility planning is a continuous process, rather than a one-time accomplishment. A number of airport proprietors have prepared updates to previously approved airport noise compatibility program as changes have occurred over [[Page 43810]] time. For the foreseeable future. Part 150 will remain the primary FAA program for evaluating and mitigating aircraft noise in an airport's vicinity. Part 150 is a valuable tool for supporting and complementing local land use planning and zoning efforts. A primary goal of part 150 is to improve the compatibility of land uses surrounding airports by reducing existing noncompatible land uses and preventing the introduction of new noncompatible http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htrn `noise2 • Page 21 of 59 land uses. In response to congressional concerns, as of October 1, 1998, FAA policy is to place additional emphasis on the prevention of new noncompatible land uses by limiting Federal funding to soundproof new homes built in noise - impacted areas. FAA's policy is that new noise sensitive land uses should be prevented from developing around airports or, in cases where prevention is not feasible, they should be rendered compatible with noise exposure levels through measures such as sound insulation during construction. Policy Element 5: Land Use Planning and Zoning The FAA will assist State and local governments and planning agencies in establishing policies and practices to minimize noise sensitive land uses around airports, including locally determined buffers outside areas of significant noise exposure.` Discussion: Both the 1976 Policy and Part 150 clearly assert that State and local governments, including airport proprietors and planning agencies, are responsible for determining the acceptable and permissible land uses around airports and defining the relationship between specific properties and airport noise contours. The airport operator must be an integral part of this planning process, and bears its own responsibility for tracking planning and development taking place in its environs, and interceding with local governments as may be appropriate to help assure long-term compatibility. Where permitted by law, the FAA is prepared to support compatible land buss planning and actions by providing planning guidance, as well as technical and financial .assistance.' Toward this end, the FAA has engaged in a national compatible land use initiative in a cooperative partnership with the National Association of State Aviation Officials (NASAO). The transition by the year 2000 to an ail Stage 3 fleet of large commercial airplanes significantly reduces aviation noise from levels previously experienced. Noise contours will continue to shrink well into the 21st century around many airports: This reduction in aviation noise exposure presents both a challenge and an opportunity to institute and maintain effective compatible land use policies and practices. There will be significant pressure todevelop residential and other noise sensitive land uses closer to some airports as noise contours shrink towards the airport boundary. Such development should be undertaken only after prudent, thoughtful community planning and appropriate mitigation. The general trend over the past few decades has been an increasing interest on the part of the American public in continuing to upgrade environmental standards. Once noise exposure levels have stabilized with the transition to an alt Stage 3 fleet, the demand by residents near airports for an ever quieter environment may outpace the delivery of further source -noise gains from advances in aircraft noise abatement technology. Additionally, not every airport will remain relatively static with respect to aircraft noise; some airports will experience high levels of, http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 noise2 growth and expansion of their facilities after completion of the Stage 3 transition, with consequent growth of their noise contours. It is important for the various governmental entities that own airports and control land uses around those airports tocoordinate airport and land use planning, and to undertake complementary actions that take into account the needs and operational requirements of the airport and the developmental goals and environmental needs of the community. The FAA encourages airport noise compatibility planning pursuant to Part 150. The FAA encourages local jurisdictions with responsibility for land use planning and zoning to take the strongest compatible land use actions with in those areas around airports still subject to significant noise exposure after the transition to an all Stage 3 fleet. According to FAA guidance, areas of significant noise exposure are those in which noise levels are DNL 65 dB or higher. Significant noise exposure is not compatible with a variety of noise sensitive land. uses, as delineated in FAA's compatible land use guidelines in Part 150. Jurisdictions should take all possible actions to make existing land uses compatible and to prevent new noncompatible land uses form developing at DNL 65 dB and above. The FAA further encourages jurisdictions to guarcl against development of new noise sensitive land uses in areas that have been compatible within the DNL 65 dB contour in the last decade or more, but will be just outside that contour with Stage 3 transition. In situations where noise compatibility measures were funded by Federal grants, Federal grant assurances require that these. properties must not become residential or zoned for other noise sensitizes uses, but must remainnon-noise sensitive even if shrinking noise contours place them outside DNL 65 dB. Based upon local factors, local jurisdictions may take a more comprehensive approach toaviation noise exposure below DNL 65. Some communities are more noise sensitive than others. Part 150 guidelines recognize local discretion to define noise sensitivity. Some communities have better opportunities than others, because of vacant land or urban redevelopment projects, to reduce and prevent noise sensitive land uses beyond the DNL 65 dB countour. Stage 3 transition and the noise compatibility gains otherwise achieved since the 1976 Policy increase the feasibility in certain locations of dealing with noise exposure below significant levels. A few airport proprietors and local jurisdictions have already begun to address areas outside DNL 65 dB to create an extra, margin of noise buffer between the airport and the community. The FAA will support local efforts to establish noise buffers by agreement between the airport proprietor and the local community, evidenced through both commitments and land use actions by affected jurisdictions: If jurisdictions firmly and consistently act to reduce, prevent, or mitigate noisesensitive development in buffer areas, the FAA will recognize such: areas and actions. http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm noise2 accordingly in NEPA assessments for proposed airport development and in Part 150 noise compatibility programs, and any resulting; noise mitigation recommendations. Local jurisdictions may use the complete array of available methods to address noise sensitive land uses. Several of the most widely used methods are briefly described below, although these are not intended to preclude the use of other methods. A combination of methods, comprising a graduated response from the most to the least adversely affected land uses, may serve communities effectively and can prudently balance costs with levels of noise exposure. The FAA strongly encourages the reductionand prevention of noncompatible land uses at noise exposure levels of DNL 65 dB and higher. Mitigation techniques short of reduction and prevention may be more viable in buffer areas. Methods may support each other for the same [[Page 43811]] properties, such as combining sound insulation, an easement, and disclosure. In applying the basic Federal policy elements, the FAA encourages local jurisdictions to. al Establish zoning ordinances or other control measures to preclude new noise sensitive development; acquire existing noncompatible properties and relocate people; implement policies and programs to redevelop noise sensitive areas into more compatible land uses. If noise sensitive development cannot be removed or precluded: acoustically insulate existing structures; establish local building codes for new residential and other noise sensitive construction requiring attenuation of exterior noise levels; purchase noise easements. Require formal disclosure of aviation noise exposure levels as a part of real estate transactions for properties located near airports, where authorized by State and local law; provide, transaction assistance tonoise impacted property owners wishing to sell. Policy Element 6: Areas With Unique Noise Sensitivities The FAA will take into account the specific circumstances of locations in national parks and other Federally managed areas with unique noise sensitivities in managing the navigable airspace and evaluating proposed FAA actions that raise aviation noise concerns. Discussion: The FAA's Noise Policy for Management of Airspace Over Federally Managed Areas, issued November 8, 1996,. affirms the FAA commitment to carefully balance the interests of the general public and aviation transportation with the need to protect certain natural environments from the impact of http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm aviation noise. This policy statement addresses FAA's management of the navigable airspace over locations in national parks and other Federally managed areas with unique noise sensitive values. It affirms that the FAA will exercise leadership in achieving an appropriate balance among environmental concerns, airspace efficiency, and technicalpracticability, while maintaining the highest. practicable level of safety. This policy envisions joint efforts by the FAA and resource-managing Federal agencies to enhance compatibility by coordinating management of the airspace and the management goals of these specific areas. In order to promote an effective balance of agency missions, the Secretaries of Transportation and the Interior are jointly reviewing the environmental and safety concerns resulting from park overflights, developing a national policy on overflights of national parks, and working toward resolution of overflight issues in specific national parks. The overarching goal is to identify how best to provide access to the airspace over national parks while ensuring all park visitors a quality experience and protecting park resources. The FAA and the National Park Service have initiated individual and joint efforts to achieve a better understanding of the effects of aviation noise on areas within national parks, preserves, and wildlife refuges. A primary focus for FAA is. to identify the extent to which low-level noise (i.e., noise levels below existing thresholds of significant, or even :adverse, impact for most common land uses) may adversely impact areas with unique noise sensitivities. At present, no scientifically verified, predictable criteria have been established. Until standardization of criteria has been achieved to the satisfaction of the Federal agencies with noise and land use responsibilities, particular interfaces of concern between aviation and special resource areas will be carefully reviewed on;:a"case-by-case basis by the FAA and the Federal agency with jurisdiction over the area. Pursuant to Executive Order 13084, * 'Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments," the FAA is committed to removing obstacles that detrimentally affect or impede working directly and effectively with tribal governments. FAA will engage in meaningful consultation with tribal governments whenever significant impacts on trust resources are identified. When requested by a tribal government, the FAA will use best efforts to make aeronautical charts available to tribal representatives, as well as information on how to identify types of aircraft that may be overflying tribal lands. Additionally, on request from tribal officials, the FAA will use best efforts to depict Native American lands that are of significance, on a.year-around basis on visual flight. rules aeronautical *sectional maps. The areas will be depicted using the demarcation associated with flying over noise sensitive national park areas. All aircraft are requested to maintain a minimum altitude of 2,000 feet above the. surface while flying over these types of areas. On request from tribal officials, the FAA will also use best efforts to assist in alerting;. pilots of Native American seasonal events of significance through Notice to Airmen (NOTAMs) or a graphical depiction in the appropriate Airport Facility Directory. http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm Policy; Element 7: FAA Financial Programs The FAA will continue strong support for noisecompatibility planning and noise mitigation projects with financial programs under its jurisdiction, with airport rates and charges policy, and by encouraging innovative funding mechanisms including creative public/private partnerships. Discussion: The 1976 Policy initiated a pilot program under which the FAA awarded the, first grants to airport proprietors to develop comprehensive airport noise control plans. Thispilot program was expanded in the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 (ASNA), which created airport noise compatibility planning under Federal Aviation REgulations (FAR) Part 150 that continues today. ASNA authorizes the FAA to fund the preparation of airport noise compatibility plans and to fund the implementation of noise compatibility programs developed under those plans, subject to FAA's approval of the program measures. All public airports are eligible to apply for Federal assistance in preparing and implementing airport noise compatibility programs under Part 150.. An approved Part 150 program is required for an airport proprietor to receive specifically earmarked grant funds for a broad array of noise mitigation projects. A statutory exception is sound insulation of educational or medical buildings in a noise impact area, which may be funded without an approved Part 150 program. Units of local government in the airport area may also apply for grants to help carry out parts of.approved Part 150 programs that are both within their jurisdiction and ability to implement.. The Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 established the first reservation, referred to as a ' set-aside," of Airport Improvement Program (AIP) funds specifically for noise compatibility planning and projects under Part 150. The first noise set-aside was established at 8 percent of the total available annual AIP. In 1982, approximately $41 million was given in noise grants. Since 1982, the noise set-aside has remained a key component in AIP legislation, whilethe set-aside has remained a key component in AIP legislation, while the set-aside percentage has been increased to reflect the growing demand for noise funding. In the last funding year of the century, the noise set-aside (established at 31 percent of AIP discretionary funding)-. has been over $168.8 million. From the inception of airport noise compatibilityfunding through fiscal. year 1999, the [[Page 43812]] FAA has issued noise planning and project grants totaling over $2.6 billion under the Airport Improvement. Program. In addition to the AIP noise set-aside, the FAA administers other statutory http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 provisions and supports decisions that result in additional funding for noise mitigation. The FAA is responsible•for'evaluating the environmental impact; of proposed airport development projects submitted for FAA approval and, funding. FAA's airport funding statue includes environmental requirements. For example, FAA may only approve a grant for a major airport development project that has a potentially significant impact on natural resources if there is no possible and prudent alternative and the project includes reasonable steps to minimize the harm. These mitigation commitments are included in the FAA decision and any subsequent grant agreements. Such commitments are eligible for AIP funding from sources other than the noise set-aside as part of the cost of the airport development project. The Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) program, established by the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990, includes among its objectives the funding of projects to mitigate airport noise impacts. PFC-eligible projects include mitigation for areas adversely impacted by noise, with or without an approved Part 150 program: Since the inception of the PFC program, the FAA has approved PFC collection' authority exceeding $1.6 billion for, noise mitigation projects --an important and growing supplement to Federal funding provided through the AIP. Another important source of airport funding for noise mitigation is airport- generated revenue. As part of its role in administering the AIP, the FAA assumes a stewardship role related to the protection of the Federal investment in airports. Generally, an airport accepting Federal assistance must agree to use all airport revenue for related costs. The FAA has long recognized that noise mitigation associated with an airport capital development project qualifies as a capital cost of the airport and, therefore, is an appropriate use of airport revenue. In June 1996, DOT issued its Policy Regarding Airport Rates and, Charges, 61 FR 31994, outlining the expenses an airport proprietor may include. in establishing cost -based fees charged to air carriers for the use of airport facilities and services. The policy permits the recovery, through rates and charges, of reasonable environmental costs to the extent that the airport proprietor incurs a corresponding actual expense. The policy expressly identifies aircraft noise abatement and mitigation as a permitted recoverable environmental cost. These provisions were not vacated in a ruling on the policy, Air Transport Association v. Department of Transportation,' 119. F.3d 38 (D.C. Cir. 1997). In the future, the FAA will continue to make Federal funding available for measures directed at mitigating noise around airports, reducing noncompatible land uses, and protecting currently compatible land uses, when such funding is financiallyfeasible and permitted by law. The challenge is to ensure adequate financial support for noise mitigation. The FAA manages available AIP funds in a manner to sustain airport noise compatibility planning and programs for as many airports as possible withnoise affected communities, giving priority http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm consideration to mitigating the most significant higher noise levels. The FAA evaluates the national demand for Federal noise funding and recommends adjustments to the Congress in reauthorizations of airport grant legislation. Increasingly the FAA seeks to leverage available Federal funding with other funding sources, including PFCs and airport revenue. In the last two years, the FAA has explored innovative financing proposals. The FAA approved an innovative project to relocate, a large number of people on an accelerated schedule from an area of airport noise impact through a Federal/local public and private sector partnership arrangement of shared costs and responsibility. The noise mitigation advantages of this project were obvious, and the, overall costs were lower in terms of AIP demand than would have been the case under the traditional approach to funding. Future innovative finance arrangements can help to sustain a strong funding commitment to noise. The FAA will work with State and local governments and the privatesectorto create. new partnerships and opportunities to increase reliable sources of funding and to accelerate adequate financing of noise mitigation projects. Section 3: Authorities and Responsibilities --Legal Framework Legal. Responsibilities of the Federal Government The principal aviation responsibilities assigned to the Federal Avaiation Administratorand since 1966 to the Secretary of: Transportation, under the Federal Aviation Act of 1958,. as amended, 49 U.S.C. 40101 et seq., concern promoting the development of civilaeronautics and safety of air commerce. The basic national policies intended to guide our actions under the Federal Aviation Act .are set forth in section 103, 49 U.S.C. 40101(d), which provides public interest standards, including: (1) Assigning, maintaining, and enhancing safety and security as the highest priorities in air commerce; (2) Regulating air commerce in a way that best promotes safety and fulfills national defense requirements; (3) Encouraging and developing civil aeronautics, including new aviation technology; (4) Controlling ,the use of the navigable airspace and regulating civil and military operations in that airspace in the interest of the safety and efficiency of both of those operations; (5) Consolidatingresearch and development for air navigation facilities and the installation and operation of those facilities; and http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 noise2 (6) Developing and operating a common system of air:traffic control and navigation for military and civil aircraft. To achieve these statutory purposes, sections 307(a), (b),. and (c) of the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C. 40103(b), 44502, and 44721, provide extensive and plenary authority to the FAA concerning use and management of the navigable airspace, air traffic control, and air navigation facilities. The FAA has exercised this authority by promulgating wide-ranging and comprehensive Federal regulations on the use of navigable airspace and air traffic control.\1\ Similarly the FAA has exercised its aviation safety authority, including the certification of airmen, aircraft, air carriers, air agencies, and airports under Title VI of the Federal Aviation Act, section 601 et seq., 49 U.S.C. 44701 et seq. by extensive Federal regulatory action.\2\ In legal terms the Federal government, through this exercise of its constitutional and statutory powers, has preempted the areas of airspace use and management, air traffic control and aviation safety. The legal doctrine of preemption, which flows from the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, is essentially that state and local authorities do not have legal power to act in an area that already is subject, to comprehensive Federal regulation. \1\ See 14 CFR Parts 71 \2\ See 14 CFR Parts 21-43, 61-67, 91 Because of the increasing public concern about aircraft noisethat accompanied the introduction of turbojet powered aircraft into; commercial service in the 1960s, and [[Page 43813]],` the constraints such concern posed for the continuing development of civil aeronautics and the air transportation system of the United States, the Federal government in 1968 sought --and Congress granted --broad authority to regulate aircraft for the purpose of noise abatement. Section 611 of the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C. 44715, constitutes the basic authority for Federal regulation of aircraft noise. In 1972, displaying some dissatisfaction with the FAA's methodical regulatory practice under section 611, the Congress amended that statute in two important respects. To the original statement of purpose, ' to afford present and future relief from aircraft noise and sonic boom," it added consideration of, ' ' protection to the public health and welfare." It also.. added the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the rulemaking process. Section 611 now requires the FAA to publish EPA proposed regulations as a notice of http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm proposed rulemaking within 30 days of receipt. If the FAA does not adopt an EPA proposal as a final rule after notice and comment, it is obliged to publish an explanation for not doing so in the Federal: Register. Whether considering a rule it proposes on its own initiative or in response to the EPA, the FAA is required by section 611(d) to consider whether a proposed aircraft noise rule is consistent with the highest degree of safety in air commerce and air transportation, economically reasonable, technologically practicable and appropriate for the particular type of aircraft. The FAA acted promptly in implementing section 611. On November 18, 1969, it promulgated the first aircraft noise regulations, Federal Aviation Regulations Part 36, 14 CFR Part 36, which set a limit on noise emissions of large aircraft of new design. It reflected the technological development of the high -bypass ratio type engine,. and was initially applied to the Lockheed 1011, the Boeing 747,. and the McDonnell -Douglas DC -14. The Part 36 preamble announced a basic policy on source noise reduction and a logically phased strategy of bringing it about. Essentially, Part 36 established the quietest uniform standard then possible, taking into accountsafety, economic reasonableness, and. technological feasibility. Part 36 was initially applicable only to new types of aircraft. As soon as the technology had been demonstrated, the standard was to be extended to all newly manufactured, aircraft of already certificated types. Ultimately, the preamble indicated, when technology was available the standard would be extended to aircraft already manufactured and in operation. The last step would requiremodification or replacement of all aircraft in the fleet that did not meet the Part 36 noise levels. The first two steps have, already been accomplished. This third step is being taken now. In accordance with the Federal noise abatement program announced in the 1976 Policy, the FAA adopted regulations in 14 CFR Part 91 to phase out operations in the United States of so-called Stage ,1, aircraft" by January 1, 1985. These aircraft were defined as civil subsonic aircraft with a gross weight ofmore than 75,000 pounds that do not, meet Stage 2 or 3 Part 36 noise standards. In 1980, pursuant to the Aviation Noise Abatement Act of 1979,.the FAA extended the phaseout requirement to foreign international operators, and was directed to issue exemptions to operators of two -engine turbojets with 100 or fewer seats for small community service until January 1, 1988. In addition to its regulatory authority over aircraft safety and noise, the FAA has long administered a program of Federal grants-in-aid for airport construction and development. By virtue of its decision-making on whether to fund particular projects, the FAA has been able,to a degree, to ensure that new airports or runways will beselected with noise impacts in mind. That indirect authority was measurably strengthened when in 1970 the Airport and Airway Development Act expanded and revised the FAA's grant-in-aid program for airport development, and added environmental considerations toproject approval criteria. These criteria include consideration of whether the project is consistent. http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm with plans (existing at the time the project is: approved) of public agencies authorized by the Statein which the airport is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport. The 1976 amendments to the 1970 Act increased funding levels and provided new authority to share in the costs of certain noise abatement activities, as part of a pilot program initiated under the 1976. Policy. Under this program, the FAA funded up to 25 -airport noise control plans per year In 1979, Congress_ enacted the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act, 49 USC 47501 et seq., to support Federal efforts to encourage development of compatible land uses around civil airports in the United States. In 1981, the FAA adopted 14 CFR Part 150 to implement ASNA. As explained in detail in Section 2, under ASNA, FAA is authorized to provide grants to airport sponsors to fund voluntary preparation of noise exposure maps, comprehensive noise compatibility planning, and soundproofing, land acquisition, and other projects to carry out noise compatibility programs. Noise compatibility programs are developed in consultationwith surrounding communities and airport users. The airport must notify the public and afford an opportunity to comment at a public hearing. The Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 (AAIA) established the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) and first made funds available for noise compatibility planning and to carry out noise compatibility programs authorized under ASNA. The AAIA has been amended several times, and authorizes the current Federal AIP program. Since 1976, the ability of .the FAA to provide financial assistance under the AIP has remained limited in terms of both percentage of project costs and the types of projects eligible for Federal aid. Applications for airport development projects have consistently exceeded available funding, although the amounts available for obligation under the AIP have ranged from approximately ;:$450 million. in Fiscal Year 1982 to' a recent high of approximately $1.9 billion in Fiscal year 1992. Through additional legislation, FAA gained authority to grant AIP funds to units of local government in order to soundproof public schools and hospitals. In 1990, Congress established a National Aviation Noise Policy in the Airport Noise and Capacity Act, 49 USC 47521 (ANCA). This Policy had three primary. elements. The first was a program for transition to an all -Stage 3 civil subsonic turbojet fleet.In 1991, pursuant to ANCA, the FAA amended Part 91 to establish a phased program to require operations by civil subsonic turbojet airplanes weighing more than 75,000 pounds to meet Stage 3 noise standards by the year 2000. This phaseout requirement applied to all operators of large Stage 2 airplanes, not just air carriers, operating in the contiguous United States. The second element was a national program for review of airport noise and access restrictions on operations by Stage 2 and 3 aircraft.. ANCA applies to restrictions on operations by Stage 2 aircraft proposed after October 1, 1990, and to restrictions on operations by Stage.3 aircraft not in effect before October http://www.southbaycties.org/docs/noise.htm 1 1990. In 1991, as a companion rulemaking to the Part 91 amendment, the FAA adopted Part 161 to implement'the requirements under ANCA relating: to airport restrictions. [[Page 43814J] After careful study, the FAA determined that Part 161 should cover operations by all Stage 2'aircraft, including those weighing less than 75,000 pounds that are not .subject to the phaseout requirement. Part 161 also applies to proposals to restrict operations by helicopters that are certificated as Stage. 2. ANCA, as implemented by Part 161, provides that airports must give 180 days notice and an opportunity for public comment on a cost -benefit analysis concerning proposals to restrict operations by Stage 2 aircraft. Proposals to restrict operations by Stage 3 aircraft must (1) be agreed upon by the airport and all users at the airport or (2) satisfy procedural requirements similar.to proposals to restrict Stage 2 operations and be approved by FAA. To be approved, restrictions must meet the following statutory criteria: (1) The restriction is reasonable nonarbitrary and nondiscriminatory. (2) The restriction does not createan undue burden on interstate or foreign commerce. (3) The proposed restriction maintains safe and efficient use of the navigable. airspace. (4) The proposed restriction does not conflict with any existing Federal statute or regulation. (5) The applicant has provided adequate opportunity for public comment on the proposed restriction. (6) The proposed restriction does not create an undue burden on the national aviation system. ANCA does not supersede preexisting law except to the extent required by the application of its terms. Preexisting law governing airport noise and access restrictions is discussed in detail below, under ' ' Legal Responsibilities of Airport Proprietors." FAA encourages airport proprietors to seek to enter into voluntary agreements with users. Voluntary agreements are not subject to ANCA, and may include agreed-upon enforcement mechanisms that are consistent with Federal law. The final element of the national noise policy was the provision of another source of funds eligibility, conditions upon compliance with the national program for review of airport noise and access restrictions. In 1990, Congress amended the Anti -Head Tax provisions of the Federal Aviation Act to authorize http://www. southbaycities. org/docs/noise. htm " noise2 FAA to approve collection and: use of PFCs by public agencies.\3\ Public agencies that control commercial service airports may, subject to FAA approval, receive passenger facility charges collected from enplaning passengers using the airport, and use these charges for airport development or noise abatement projects. PFCscharges may be used, among other things, to finance remedial measures that would qualify for AlP funding if included in an approved airport noise compatibility program. The PFC program has assumed increasing importance in providing revenue for noise as well as capacity -enhancing projects. 3.2 Legal. Responsibilities of State and Local Governments While the Federal government's exclusive statutory responsibility for noise abatement through regulation of flight operations and aircraft design is broad, the noise abatement responsibilities of state and local governments, through exercise of their basic police powers, are circumscribed. The scope of their authority has been most clearly described in negative terms, arising from litigation over their rights to act. The chief restrictions on state and local police powers arise from the exclusive Federal control over the management of airspace. Local authorities have been long prevented by Federal preemption of authority in the area from prohibiting or regulating overflight for any purposes.\4\ That principle was found in 1973 to include any exercise of police power relating to aircraft operations in City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, 411 U.S. 624 (1973). In the Burbank case, the Supreme Court struck down a. curfew imposed by the City in the exercise of its police power at an airport not owned by it. The court stated that, ' the. pervasive nature of the scheme of Federal regulation of aircraft noise leads us to conclude that there is Federal preemption." 411 U.S. at 633. The national character of the subject matter also supported preemption. 411 U.S. at 625. If we were to uphold the Burbank ordinance and a significant number of municipalities followed suit, it is obvious that fractionalized control of the timing of takeoffs and landings would severely limit the flexibility of the FAA in controlling air traffic flow. The difficulties of scheduling flights to avoid congestion andthe concomitant decrease in safety would be compounded." 411 U.S. at 639. Although control of noise is deep-seated in the police power of the states (411 U.S. at 638), the Court found that Congress unequivocally intended that the Federal government have "full control over aircraft noise, preempting state and local control." 411 U.S. 625, 627-28, 639. The Court's reliance on the legislative history of section 611`: of the Federal Aviation Act and its 1972 amendments indicates that othertypes of police power regulation, such as restrictions on the type of aircraft using a particular airport, are equally proscribed. The Court, however, specifically. excluded consideration of what limits, if any, apply to a municipality acting in its proprietary capacity. In two subsequent cases, Federal courts determined that the constitutionality of state airport noise regulations depended upon whether they sought to directly ht-tp://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm control aircraft noise or mitigate its effects. In Air Transport Association v. Crotti, 389 F. Supp. 58 (N.D. Cal., 1975) a state airport noise statute that imposed noise abatement duties on airport' proprietors without directly regulating aircraft operation was upheld. California's statutory andregulatory scheme established permissible cumulative noise (community noise equivalent noise levels or CNEL) standards for continued operation of airports, monitoring requirements, and ultimate noise levels for surrounding land uses. In upholding the validity of the statutory scheme, the court noted that airport authorities were left to choose among suggested procedures, and were free. to use other noise control measures beyond those suggested to achieve the prescribed noise standards. \4\ American Airlines v. Town of Hempstead, 398 F.2d 369 (2d Cir. 1968) Town noise ordinance that prohibited overflights over the village by aircraft that did not meet certain noise standards held invalid because Congress had preempted the field of aircraft operation. Compliance with the ordinance would have required the alteration of FAA promulgated flight patterns and procedures controlling aircraft in the New York City area; American Airlines v. City of Audubon Park, 297 F. Supp. 207, 407 F.2d 1306 (6th Cir. 1969) Court held that local ordinance conflicted with the glide slope which aircraft were required to follow in approaching the airport. The court indicated that efforts to control aircraft traffic under the CNEL. might be suspect,but since no action had been taken the court refrained from ruling upon' limitations to the airport proprietor's authority. In this same case, the court struck down maximum single event noise exposure levels (SENEL) for takeoff and landings of aircraft, which had been established by the .State for enforcement by counties throughcriminal fines levied against aircraft operators.' The court held that these state regulations were per se unlawful exercises of police power because they attempted to regulate noise levels occurring when aircraft were in direct flight in clear contravention of FAA's statutory authority. \5\ \5\ See also, Minnesota Public Lobby v. Metropolitan Airport Commission, 520 N.W. 2d 388 (Minn. 1994) Minnesota Supreme Court held that the Metropolitan Airports Commission was not required to develop a plan to comply with state pollution control noise standards in operating Minneapolis -St. Paul International. Airport. The State's noise standards as applied to MAC impinged on aircraft operations because (1) enforcement of the standards would severely limit the flexibility of the FAA in controlling aircraft flow and (2) compliance would be impossible without either substantially reducing aircraft operations, converting http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm much of South Minneapolis and the surrounding suburbs to non-residential areas,or moving the airport. In the opinion of the court the State had no power to require an airport proprietor such as MAC to use its proprietary powers in certain ways that may have achieved compliance with the noise standards. [[Page 43815]] In 1981, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed a measure that the state required an airport proprietor to implement in order to comply with the airport ._ noise standards upheld in Crotti. In San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco, 651 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. •1981), cert den. 455 U.S. 1000 (1982), the State of California sought to require the Port District, as owner of Lindbergh. Field, to extend a curfew. The State made extension of the curfew a condition of the variance neededto continue to operate the airport, which was not in compliance with California noise standards. Like the curfew in City of Burbank, the court found that the State's curfew impinged on airspace management by directing when planes may in the San Diego area, and on Federal control of aircraft noise at its source by restricting the permissible flight times of aircraft solely on the basis of. noise. The court explained that the Federal government has only preempted local regulation of the source of noise, _not. the entire field of aviation noise. The effects of noise may be mitigated by state and. local government independently of source noise control. ' Local governments may adopt local noise abatement plans that do not impinge upon aircraft operations." 651. F.2d at 1314. The court declined to interpret the 1976 Aviation Noise Abatement Policy as evidence that the Federal Government, had abdicated its duties to regulate aircraft noise or for the proposition that states may use their police power to coerce political subdivisions to use proprietary powers. The court also found that the State of California was. not a proprietor of Lindbergh Field, and thus could not rely upon Burbank's proprietor exception permitting airports utilizing their proprietary powers (rather than police powers) to enact reasonable,nonarbitrary; and nondiscriminatory, rules defining the permissible level of noise which can be created by, aircraft using the airport. The ruling in City of Burbank was held to govern the exercise of zoning authority,. to ban a taxiway project in Burbank -Glendale Pasadena Airport Authority v. City of Los Angeles, 979 F.2d 1339 (9th Cir. 1-992). In the .BGPAA case, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the constitutionality of an ordinance that required prior submission and approval of plans for development of a 54 -acre parcel of land. The land, which was used solely for aircraft landings and takeoffs at Burbank Airport, was slated for construction of a taxiway project that was expected to produce significant safety improvements and noise benefits. The ordinance was enacted by the City of Los Angeles just before. construction of a taxiway project was to begin, and applied exclusively to the parcel of land owned by the airport but located in the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles. The court found that the City was prohibited from conditioning http://www.southbaycities.orgidocs/noise.htip airport development on prior City approval. It stated that proper placement of taxiways and runways is critical to the safety of takeoffs and landings and essential to the efficient management of the navigable airspace. The. Court stated that Federal aviation safety interests preempted control of airport ground facilities. The Court held that nonproprietor jurisdictions may not abuse their land use powers by delaying:a safety project and withholding.a building permit until. the. FAA and the airport proprietor agree to aircraft noise control terms. Recent years have witnessed a steady increase in state and local ordinances and zoning measures that seek to regulate growth and expansion of large metropolitan airports.\6\ Federal law and policy continues to confirm that state and local police power regulation of aircraft noise is Federally preempted when. it impinges on airspace management, aircraft flight, and operations. :Non - proprietors may take noise impacts into account in siting airports and other facilities, and may mitigate the effects of noise. Federal aviation statutes do not direct the Federal government to decide where airports should be located, or whether and where an existing airport should acquire additional property for expansion; instead, such decisions are the primary responsibility of airport owners and operators. However, Federal authority to control the navigable airspace necessarily encompasses the placement, size, and configuration of runways. Likewise, the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 prescribes a dominant role for the FAA in airport development, which encompasses constructing, repairing, or improving public use airports, and imposes significant program responsibilities on the FAA. Non -proprietor jurisdictions have no role in determining the legal requirements for runway expansion and development. within the boundaries of the existing airport. Federal aviation .law preempts local ordinances designed to control and impede air navigation facilities, airport safety projects, or development projects on airport property at major airports as a means of controlling aircraft noise, and to otherwise control flight operations and impede safe and efficient airspace management. As a corollary of this principle, stateand local governments may not use their police powers to require airport proprietors to exercise their ::proprietary powers to control aircraft noise at its source. The FAA is closely scrutinizing actions by state and local governments seeking to limit airport expansion, particularly of major metropolitan airports.. FAA has and will continue to intervene in, appropriate cases to assure that state and local governments exercise their authorities in full accord with the principles in City of Burbank and its progency. \6\ See, e.g., ;Dallas Ft. Worth International Airport Board v. City of Irving, 854 S.W.2d 750 (Ct. of Appeals Texas 1993), writ denied, 894 S.W.2d 456 (Tex. App -Ft. Worth 1995); City of New Orleans v. Kenner, 1992 U.S. ,Dist. LEXIS 1046 (ED La 1992), rev'd_F.2d__ (5th Cir. 8/6/92); City of Cleveland v. City of Brook Park, 893 F. Supp 742 (ND Ohio 1995); City of Burbank v. BGPAA (85 Cal. Rpt. 2d 28:(1999), review den., 1999 Cal. LEXIS 5393 (Cal Sup. Ct. 8/11/99) http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm In addition to established case law, Section 105 of the, Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, 49 U.S.C. 41713 expressly provides that States, political subdivisions of. States, and political authorities of at least two States, are prohibited from enacting or enforcing any law relating to, a price, route, or service of an air carrier. This statute was intended to ensure that States would not undo Federal deregulation with regulation of their own. This statute prohibits state laws or, local noise ordinances that would constitute a direct or indirect regulation of a price, route or service of an air carrier. As noted in the Section entitled "Legal Responsibilities of Airport Proprietors," it preserves the authority of airport proprietors. The FAA encourages local authorities to implement airport noise compatibility planning and protect their citizens from unwanted aircraft noise, principally through their powers of land use control. Control of land use around airports to ensure that only compatible development may occur in noise - impacted areas is a key tool in limiting [[Page 43816]] the number of citizens exposed to noise impacts, and it remains exclusively in the control of state and local governments. Occasionally, it is a power enjoyed by individual airport operators; some operators are municipal governments that can impose appropriate land use controls through zoning and other authority. But even where municipal governments themselves are operators, the noise impacts of theirairports often occur in areas outside their jurisdiction.. Other police power measures, such as requirements that noise impacts be revealed in real estate transactions, are also available to them. Other measures are also available to mitigate the effects of noise, such as by baffling existing noise or resetting those affected by noise. Finally, local governments have legal authority to take noise impacts into account in their ownactivities, such as their choice of location and design for new airports, new schools, hospital or other public facilities, as well as sewers, highways and other basic infrastructure services that influence land development. 3.3 Legal Responsibilities of Airport Proprietors Under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Federal law preempts state or local law when Congress expressly or impliedly indicates an intention to displace state or, local law, or when that law actually conflicts with Federal law. As discussed above, in 1973, the Supreme Courtheld that the pervasive scope of Federal regulation of the airways implied a congressional intention to preempt municipal aircraft noise restrictions based upon the police power. The court left the door open to noise regulations imposed by municipalities acting as. airport proprietors, \7\ however, based on such municipalities legitimate interest in avoiding liability for excessive noise generated by the airports they own.` After Burbank, Congress expressly provided that the proprietary powers http://www.southbaycities.orgMocs/noise.htm and rights of municipal airport owners are not preempted by. Federal law. 49 U.S.C. 41713 (section 105 of the Airline Deregulation Act: of 1978). Thus, the task of protecting the local population from airport noise has fallen to the agency, usually the local government, that owns and operates the airport. Subsequent to the Burbank decision, the courts have confirmed that Congress has reserved a limited role for local airport proprietors to regulate noise levels at their airports. Thus, theresponsibilities of state and local governments as airport proprietors are less restricted than those of non -proprietor governments. The rationale for the airport proprietor exception is that airport proprietors bear monetary liability for excessive noise under the Supreme Court decision in Griggs v. Allegheny County, 369 U.S. 84 (1962).`` The Court found that because the airport proprietor had that liability, fairness dictated that airport proprietors must also have the power to insulate themselves from that liability. The proprietor, the court reasoned, planned the location of the airport, the direction and length of the runways, and has the ability to acquire more land around the airport. From this control flows the liability, based on the constitutional requirement of just compensation for property taken for a public purpose. The Court concluded: ' •' Respondent in designing the Greater Pittsburgh Airport had to acquire some private property. Our conclusion is that by constitutional standards it did not acquire enough." The role of the proprietor described, by the Court remains the same today. \7\ Traditionally, airport proprietors own and operatethe airport, promote the airport, andhave the legal :power to acquire necessary approach easements. In contrast, it is understandable that non -proprietor localities in the vicinity of major airports cannot be permitted an independent role in controlling the noise of passing aircraft. In the words of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. [t]he likelihood of multiple, inconsistent rules would be a dagger pointed at the heart of commerce --and the rule applied might come literally to depend on which way the wind was blowing. The task of protecting the local population from airport noise has, accordingly, fallen to the agency, usually of local government, charged with operating the airport. British Airways Board.. v.' Port Authority of New York and. New Jersey, 558 F.2d 75, 83 (2d Cir. 1977). An airport proprietor's powers, however, are not unlimited. For example, Federal case law consistently holds that proprietors are vested only with the power to promulgate reasonable, nonarbitrary, and nondiscriminatory regulations establishing acceptable noise levels for the airport and its http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 immediate environs that avoid the`; appearance of irrational or arbitrary action.' National Helicopter Corp. v. City of New York, 137 F.3d 81, 89 (2d Cir. 1998); British Airways Board v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 558 F.2d 75, 564 F.2d 1002 (2d. Cir. 1977). The Department of Transportation's own policy statement similarly states that an airport owner's conduct is not preempted as an exercise of its proprietary powers when such exercise is reasonable, nondiscriminatory, nonburdensome to interstate commerce, and designed to accomplish a legitimate State objective in a manner that does not conflict -with the provisions and policies of the aviation provisions of Title 49 of the United States Code. 14 CFR 399.110(f). In the British Airways case, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey banned the Concorde SST aircraft from using Kennedy International Airport pending a six-month study of operating experience at other U.S. airports. Rather than applying its 1951 noise standard to the new Concorde aircraft, the Port Authority banned the aircraft based on its low frequency sound. Air France and British Airways challenged the ban, arguing among other things, that the ban was preempted by DOT's authorization of Concorde landings at JFK and provision of detailed regulations for noise control at the airport, and that it was discriminatory and an undue burden on commerce. The Court of. Appeals held that the Port Authority possessed the power and bore the responsibility to establish fair, even-handed and nondiscriminatory regulations designed to abate the effect of aircraft noise on surrounding communities and directed the lower court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the reasonableness of the. Port,. Authority's ban based upon low frequency sound. Subsequent to the first ruling, the Port Authority resisted in responding to the airlines' desire to secure a fair test of their aircraft in. New York. The Port Authority refused to accord landing rights to an airplane that was capable of meeting its rule that had consistently been applied to all other aircraft for nearly 20years--112 PNdB. As a result, the carriers brought suit again. In the second British Airways case, the Court of Appeals affirmed its prior ruling concerning the limitations of proprietary powers. The court then affirmed the enjoining of further prohibition of Concorde operations at Kennedy Airport until the Port Authority promulgated a reasonable, nonarbitary .and nondiscriminatory noise regulation that all aircraft were afforded the opportunity to. meet. The action of the Port Authority purporting to exercise delegated authority to regulate noise was held to constitute unjust discrimination within the meaning of the AAIA when the` action' resulted: in denial of use of the airport to aircraft that met noise standards applies to other aircraft allowed to use the airport. The court pointed out that with respect to the reasonableness of airport use restrictions, it is important that they be found on , ' definitive findings, based on substantial evidence, that the proposed use would jeopardize the http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.httn noise2 Page 39 of 59 health, safety, or welfare of the public." British Airways, 564 F.2d 102, 1014 (2d Cir. 1977). A noise curfew prohibiting the arrival or departure on a non -emergency; basisof any aircraft between the hours of 12 midnight and 7 a.m. applying to all aircraft regardless of the noise emission level of degree of noise producedwas found to be an unreasonable, arbitrary, and discriminatory and overbroad exercise of power by the county in U.S. v. Westchester, 571 F. Supp. 786 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). In City and County of San Francisco v. FAA, 942 F.2d 1391 (9th Cir. 1991), a city regulation was interpreted to ban a retrofitted Q-707 meeting Stage 2 standards from using the airport while other Stage 2 aircraft making similar levels of noise were permitted. The aircraft operator filed a complaint with the FAA alleging that exclusion of its retrofitted 707 was unjustly discriminatory in violation of the city's Airport Improvement Program grant assurances. A DOT law judge found that the city had breached its grant assurance that it would operate the airport without unjust. discrimination. The FAA Administrator affirmed the law judge's finding because the city's noise regulation allowed aircraft that were equally noisy or noisier than Q -707's to operate at the airport and: increase: in number without limit, while excluding the Q-707 based on a characteristic that had no bearing on noise (date of type -certification as meeting Stage 2 requirements). Thus, the regulation violated the statutory requirement and the city's grant assurance requirement that the airport would be available without unjust discrimination. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the FAA's interpretation of the statutory. and grant assurance requirements as reasonable. This case, as in the British Airways cases, illustrates that use of noise control regulations by an airport proprietor to bar aircraft on a basinother than noise, or without a factual basis,was found 'to be inconsistent with a fair and efficient national air transportation system. Airport proprietors are also prohibited from enacting noise restrictions that would impose an undue burden on interstate commerce. The Commerce Clause prohibits any state or local government actions that would 'unconstitutionally burden interstate commerce. For the most part, noise ordinances that would violate the Commerce Clause when the particular means chosen by the proprietor to achieve its goals are irrational, arbitrary or unrelated to those goals. For example, a court would likely strike down a noise ordinance if its purpose was in fact to disfavor interstate commerce, its benefits were illusory or insignificant, or impermissibleparochial considerations unconstitutionally burdened interstate commerce. In U.S. v. Westchester, 571 F. Supp. 786 (S.D.N.Y. 1983), the court found that a blanket nighttime curfew regardless of noise emission, had an adverse impact on the flow of air commerce because it interfered with and prevented the efficient use of the navigable airspace,. resulting in bunching of flights, delays in flights not only at Westchester County Airport but at LaGuardia and 'other airports in the metropolitan area, and disruption in the flow of air traffic in. the New York City metropolitan area. The curfew further 'represented an unlawful exercise of local police power by the http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htin In National Aviation v. Hayward, 418 F. Supp. 417 (N.D. Cal. 1976), the court reviewed the constitutionality of an ordinance which prohibited the operation of aircraft between the hours of 11 p.m. and 7 a.m. by aircraft which exceeded a noise level of 75 dBA. The plaintiffs argued that the ordinance burdened interstate commerce by forcing them to make their flights from Oakland Airport rather than. Hayward Air Terminal, thereby impairing their ability to deliver mail and newspapers to customers in California and other nearby states. Thecourt upheld the airport's nighttime noise level limitation as a valid exercise of proprietary rights. On application of a balancing test under the Commerce Clause, the court found that the burden imposed on the flow of commerce was incidental and did not overcome the local interest in controlling noise levels at Hayward Air Terminal during late evening and morning hours. The nighttime noise level .limitation did not sufficiently reduce the value of aircraft operator leases so as to be an unlawful taking under the 14th Amendment. In Santa Monica Airport association v. City of Santa Monica, 659 F.2d 100 (9th Cir. 1981), the court stuck down an airport ban on the operation of jet aircraft on the basis of noise under the Commerce and Equal Protection Clauses of the U.S. Constitution because the quality and quantity of noise emitted by thejets had no greater tendency to irritate and annoy than that emitted by permitted propeller -driven aircraft In Alaska Airlines v. City of Long Beach, 951 F.2d 977 (9th Cir. 1991), the City, of Long Beach had enacted a curfew in 1981 which limited air carrier flights to 15 per day and required carriers to use quieter aircraft. The Court of Appeals overruled the distnct court's findings that the ordinance was preempted by Federal law, impermissibly burdened interstate commerce, violated equal protection principles, and was arbitrary and capricious, or otherwise not rationally related to legitimate governmental concerns. The Court of Appeals found that each of the challenged provisions of the ordinance was sufficiently supported by a reasonable and legitimate justification.' Airports that are recipients of Federal airport development grants have specific contractual duties, under the terms of their airport development grant agreements, to ensure that their facilities are available under equitable conditions. These obligations include the duty to ensure that the airport is available for public use on fair and reasonable terms and without unjust discrimination, and that no restriction results in the establishment of an exclusive right. The courts have made it clear that these contractual obligations are an important aspect of the limitations on an airport owner's authority to control aircraft noise, for example, in the issuance of curfews. In U.S. v. Westchester, 571 F Supp. 786 (S.D.N.Y. 1983), discussed in part above, the court also found that the county had obligated itself by the FAA's grant assurances to make the airport available for public use on fair and http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm reasonable terms, without unjust discrimination, and at all times. The court noted that failure to comply with the conditions of a grant authorized the FAA to suspend current grant payments and withhold future grants. The court held that Westchester's curfew on flight operations constituted a breach of the terms, conditions, and assurances set forth in the grant-in-aid agreements between the county and the FAA, and that the FAA properly refused to pay further grant monies to the county based on its failure to comply with grant conditions and assurances. The power r thus left to the proprietor --to control what types of aircraft use its airports, to impose curfews or other use restrictions, and, subject FAA approval, to regulate runway use and flight paths --is not unlimited.. Though not preempted, the proprietor is subject to two important Constitutional restrictions. It first may not take any action thatimposes an undue, burden on interstate or foreign commerce, and second may not unjustly discriminate between different categories of airport users. As discussed, [[Page 43818]] airport. proprietorsthat are recipients of FAA airport development grants are subject to certain statutory and contractual obligations including that to make the airport available for public use on reasonable terms and conditions. Also, states, political subdivisions of states, and political authorities of at least two states may not enactor enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier, unless that law or regulation is 'consistent with the proprietary exception. See, 49 U.S.C. 41713.. Our concept of the legal framework underlying .this. Policy Statement is that proprietors retain the flexibility to impose such restrictions if they do not violate any Constitutional or statutory proscription. We have been urged to undertake -- and have considered carefully and rejected --full and complete Federal preemption of the field of aviation noise abatement. In our judgment the control and reduction of airport noise must remain a shared responsibility among airport prop.rietors,users, and governments. Summary The legal framework with respect to noise may be summarized as follows: http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 The Federal Government has preempted the areas of airspace use and management, air traffic control, safety and the regulation of aircraft noise at its source. The Federal government also has substantial power to influence airport development throughlts administration of the Airport Improvement Program. • Ili Other powers and authorities to control airport noise rest with the airport proprietor --including the power to select an airport site, acquire land, assure compatible land use, and control airport design, scheduling and operations -- subject to Constitutional reibitions against creation of an undue burden on interstate and foreign commerce, and unreasonable, arbitrary, and unjust discriminatory rules that advance the local interest, other statutory requirements, and interference with exclusive Federal regulatory responsibilities over safety and airspace management. • State and local' governments may protect their citizens throughland use controls and other police power measures not affecting airspace management or aircraft operations In addition, to the extent they are airport proprietors, they have the powers described in the preceding section. The authorities and responsibilities under the Policy may be summarized as follows: • The Federal Government has the authority and responsibility to control aircraft noise by the regulation of source emissions, by flight operational procedures, and by management of the air traffic control system and navigable airspace in ways that minimize noise impact on residential areas, consistent with the highest standards of safety. The Federal government also provides financial and technical assistance to airport proprietors for noise reduction planning and abatement activities and, working with the private sector, conducts continuing research into noise abatement technology. Airport Proprietors are primarily responsible for planning and implementing action designed to reduce the effect of noise on residents of the surrounding area. Such actions include optimal site location, improvements in airport design, noise abatement ground procedures, land acquisition, and restrictions on airport use that do not unjustly discriminateagainst any user, impede the Federal interest in safety and management of the air navigation system, or unreasonably interfere with interstate or foreign commerce. • State and Local Governments and Planning Agencies shouldprovide for land. use planning and development, zoning, and housing regulations that are compatible with airport operations. IS Air Carriers are responsible for retirement, replacement or retrofit for older jets that do not meet Federal noise level standards, and for scheduling and flying airplanes in a way that minimizes the impact of noise on people. tAtrTravelers and Shippers generally should bear the cost of noise reduction, http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm • consistent with established Federal economic and environmental policy that the costs of complying with laws and public policies should be reflected in the price of goods and services.: Ii Residents and Prospective Residents in areas surrounding airports should seek to understand the noise problem and what steps can be taken to minimize its effect on people. Individual and community responses to aircraft noise differsubstantially and, for, someindividuals, a reduced level of noise may not eliminate the annoyance or irritation. Prospective residents of areas impacted by airport noise thus should be aware of the effect of noise on their quality of life and act accordingly. \1\ See 14 CFR Parts 71, 73, 75, 91, 93, 95, and 97 \2\ See 14 CFR Parts 21-43, 61-67, 91 121 through 149. \3\ See 49 USC 40116, 14 CFR Part 158. \4\ American Airlines v. Town of Hempstead, 398 F.2d 369 (2d Cir. 1968) Town noise ordinance that prohibited overflights over the village by aircraft that did not meet certain noise standards held invalid because Congress had preempted the field of aircraft operation. Compliance with the ordinance would have required the alteration of FAA -promulgated flight patterns and procedures controlling aircraft in the New York City area; American Airlines v. City of Audubon Park, 297 F. Supp. 207, 407 F.2d 1306 (6th Cir. 1969) Court held that local ordinance conflicted with the glide slope which aircraft were required to follow in approaching the airport. \5\ See also, Minnesota Public Lobby v. Metropolitan Airport Commission,. 520 N.W. 2d 388 (Minn. 1994) Minnesota Supreme Court held that the Metropolitan Airports Commission was not required to develop a plan to comply with state pollution control noise standards in operating Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. The State's noise standards as applied to MAC impinged on aircraft operations because (1) enforcement of the standards would severely limit the flexibility of the FAA in controlling aircraft flow and (2) compliance would be impossible without either substantially reducing aircraft operations, converting much of South Minneapolis and the surrounding suburbs to non-residential areas, or moving the airport. In the opinion of the court the State had no power to require an airport proprietor such as MAC to use its proprietary powers in certain ways that may have achieved compliance with the noise standards. \6\ See, e.g., Dallas Ft. Worth International Airport Board v. City of Irving, 854 S.W. 2d 750 (Ct. of Appeals Texas 1993), writ denied, 894 S.W. 2d 456 (Tex. App -Ft. Worth 1995);: City of New Orleans v. Kenner, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1046 (ED La 1992), rev'd F.2d_ (5th Cir. 8/6/92); City of Cleveland v. City of Brook Park, 893 F. Supp 742 (ND Ohio 1995); City of Burbank v. BGPAA (85 http://wwvv.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 Cal Rpt. 2d 28 (1999), review den. 8/11/99). \7\ Traditionally, airport proprietors own and operate the airport, promote the airport, and have the legal power to acquire necessady approach easements. Section 4: Assessing Aviation Noise 4.1 Foundations The Federal government's methods and standards for measuring and assessing noise impacts derive from scientific research and a series of interagency committee reviews. Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise In 1979 the Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise (FICUN) was formed to develop Federal policy and guidance on noise. The committee's membership included the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the FAA, the Federal Highway Administration, and the Departments of Defense (DOD), Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Veterans Affairs (VA). Among other things, it developed consolidated Federal agency land use compatibility guidelines using Yearly Day -Night Average Sound Levels (DNL) as the common descriptor of noise levels. In order to develop the guidelines, it was also necessary to establish a correlation between land use and noise exposure classifications. The FICUN issued its report entitled Guidelines for Considering -Noise in Land Use Planning and Control in June 1980. This report established the Federal government's DNL 65 dB standard and related guidelines. The FICUN generally agreed that standard residential construction was compatible for noise exposure from all sources up to DNL 65 dB, Their land use compatibility guidelines for noise exposure between DNL 65-70 dB called for building codes to require at least 25 dB outdoor to indoor noise level reduction (NLR); between DNL 70-75 dB, at least 30 dB NLR. The FICUN considered noise exposure above DNL 75 dB to be ' ''incompatible" with all residential uses except transient lodging with NLR of at least 35 dB. The report contained a comprehensive guidelines table. This table contains the following footnote regarding residential and certain other noise -sensitive uses in the moderate exposure zone from DNL 55-65 dB:. . The designationof these uses as ' ' compatible" in this [moderate impact] zone reflects individual Federal agencies' consideration of general cost and feasibility factors as well as past community experiences and program objectives. http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm Localities, when evaluating "the "application of these guidelines to specific situations, may have different concerns or goals to consider. The designations contained in the. FICUN's land use compatibility table do not constitute a Federal determination that any use of land covered by the program is acceptable or unacceptable under Federal,' State, or local law. The responsibility for determining the acceptable and permissible land uses and the relationship between specific [[Page 43819]] properties' and specific noise contours rests with the local .authorities. Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 The ASNA was the first Federal legislation, specifically addressing airport noise compatibility. The FAA implemented the: ASNA's provisions in Part 150. This regulation adopted the DNL metric and the 65 dB land use compatibility guideline. This Federal guideline has been widely accepted by airport proprietors as a threshold for limiting new residential development and for sound insulation where new development is permitted above this guideline. The subsection on Airport Noise Compatibility Planning in Section 2 addresses Part 150 provisions in greater detail. Federal Interagency Committee on Noise In 1991, the .FAA and EPA initiated the Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) to review technical and policy issuesrelated to assessment of noise impacts around airports. Membership included representatives from DOD, DOT, HUD, the. Department of Justice, VA, and the Council on Environmental Quality. The FICON review focused, among other things, on the manner in which noise impacts are determined and described and the extent of impacts outside of DNL 65 dB that should be reviewed in a NEPA document. The FICON's findings and recommendations were published in an August 1992 report, Federal Agency. Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues. With respect to DNL, the FICON found that there are no new descriptors or metrics of sufficient scientific standing to substitute for the present DNL cumulative noise exposure metric. It further recommended continuing the use of the DN metric as the principal means for describing long-term noise exposure of civil and military aircraft operations. The FICON reaffirmed the methodology employing DNL as the noise exposure metric and appropriate dose -response relationships (primarily the Schultz curve for Percent Highly Annoyed) to determine community noise impacts. Based on these findings, the FICON supported agency discretion in the use of supplemental noise analysis. It also recommended that further analysis should. http://www.southbaycities.orWdocs/noise.htm noise2 be conducted of noise -sensitive areas between DNL 60-65 db having an increase of 3 dB or more if screening analysis shows that noise -sensitive areas at or above DNL 65 dB will have an increase of DNL 15 dB or more. The FICON. decided not to recommend evaluation of aviation noise impact below DNL 60 dB because public heath and welfare effects below that level have not been established. The FICON strongly supported increasing research efforts on methodology development and on impact of aircraft noise. It recommended a standing Federal interagency committee be established to assist agencies in providing adequate forums for discussion of public and private sector proposals identifying needed research and in encouraging research and development in these areas.Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise The Federal Interagency` Committee on Aviation Noise (FICAN) was formed in 1993 based on the FICON "report's policy recommendation to form a standard interagency committee forfacilitating research on methodology development " and on the impact of aircraft noise. Membership includes representatives from DOD, HUD, DOT and the Department of the Interior, as well as NASA and the EPA. Each of the Federal agencies conducting significant research on aviation - related noise is represented on FICAN. Some member agencies, such as HUD and EPA, are not currently conducting research but have broad policy roles with respect to aviation noise issues. The FICAN does not conduct or directly fund any research. Rather, it serves as a clearinghouse for Federal aircraft noise research -and development -(R&D) efforts and as a focal point for questions and recommendations on aviation noise R&D. Products include various reports, studies, analyses, findings, and conclusions. The FICAN holds periodic meetings, including a public forum, and issues a report on its activities annually. Since its inception in 1993, it has reached the following conclusions: Interagency communication between researchers will help researchers to understand other agencies' goals and objectives in their research programs; afford the opportunity for researchers to discuss the projects ongoing at their own or other agencies; and result in more efficient• use of Federal funds by reducing redundancy of research, increasing collaboration, and pooling the talents of various agency scientists. it The public forum is a valuable mechanism for soliciting input from interested members of the aviation profession and community members. The Acoustical Society of America should form a working group tasked with development a revised standard for predicting noise -induced sleep disturbance. Current and future FICAN activities include: http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm • Working with researchers to develop individual agency priorities for research to address issues regarding overflight noise in parks and wilderness areas. • Publishing technical positions on aviation noise topics based on definitive research by member agencies. Such topics include noise -induced sleep disturbance, non -auditory health effects, and land use compatibility guidelines. 4.2 Assessment Methodologies Yearly Day -Night Average Sound Levels (DNL) The FAA and other Federal agencies use DNL as the primary measure of noise Impacts on people and land uses. This cumulative metric is the Federal standard because it: Correlates well with the results of attitudinal surveys of residential noise impact; Increases with the duration of noise events, which is important to people's reaction; iTakes into account the number of noise events of the full 24 hours in a day, which also is important to people's reaction; UTakes into account the increased sensitivity to noise at night by including a 10 -dB nighttime penalty between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. to compensate for sleep disturbance and other effects; U Allows composite measurements of all sources of community noise and U Allows quantitative comparison of noise from various sources with a community. DNL is, the only metric backed with a substantial body of scientific survey data on the reactions of people to noise. It provides a simple method to compare the effectiveness of alternative airport scenarios. Land use planners have acquired over 20 years of working experience applying this metric to make zoning and planning decisions. DNL is a sound and workable tool for land use planning and in relating aircraft noise to community reaction. Experienceindicates that DNL provides, a very good measure of impacts on the quality of the human environment, forming an adequate basis for decisions that influence major transportation infrastructure projects. In an August 1992 report, the FICON reaffirmed both DNL as the appropriate metric for measuring aviation noise exposure and DNL 65 dB as the Federal Government's level of significance for assessing noise impacts. [[Page 43820]] Some people challenge the use of DNL to assess aviation noise because it is a http://www. southbaycities. org/docs/noise.htm measure of exposure from cumulative events over time rather than a measure of exposure from a single noise event. Commonly cited as potential alternative metrics are the Sound Exposure Level (SEL), which describes cumulative noise exposure from a single event, and Maximum Level (L<INF>max</INF>), the highest level during a single event. Although sometimes useful as supplemental measures of noise exposure, single event metrics pose problems. They present neither an accurate picture of noise exposure nor the overall impact of noise on a community. Because single event metrics by definition are not composites of cumulative events, 100 aircraft operations a day would be no worse than -one operation. Similarly, one event at 90 dB would be assessed as worse than 100 events at 89 dB. These effects clearly do not reflect noise impacts or annoyance reactions accurately. Alternatively, DNL increases with, the number of operations, while single event measures do not. DNL combines the number of operations with the loudness of each operation into a cumulative noise dose. The resulting values correlate well with independent tests of annoyance from all sources of noise. Human response to noise involves both the maximum level and its duration, so the maximum sound level alone is not sufficient to evaluate the effect of noise. on people. Clearly, people are bothered by individual noise events, but their sense of annoyance increases with the number of those noise events, and with. those that occur late at night The DNL metric provides a combined measure of these factors that can be used to evaluate existing and predicted future conditions on an unambiguous, single -number basis. Although DNL is an average of cumulative noise levels, sound levels of the loudest events control the. DNL calculation. Both L<INF>max</INF> and SELmeasure individual sound events that may occur onlyonce, or may occur several times during the day. The number of times these events occur and when they occur are important in measuring the noise environment. DNL is a time -average of the total sound energy over a 24-hour period, adjusted by providing a 10 dB penalty to sound levels occurring between 10PM and 7AM. This 10 dB penalty means that one nighttime sound event is equivalent to 10 daytime events of the same level. Accordingly, DNL combines both the intensity and number of single noise events with a nighttime weighting factor in a manner that is strongly influenced by maximum sound levels. Recognizing that DNL often is criticized based on perceptions of community annoyance, the FICON reaffirmed that complaints are an inadequate indicator of the full extent of noise effects on a population. The DNL 65 dB. level of significance does not mean that no one is annoyed below that level. Extensive -research has been conducted to evaluate annoyance. In an attempt to meet demandfor a..usable and uniform relationship between noise and annoyance, T.). Schultz reviewed the results of 161 social surveys where data were available to make a consistent judgment concerning what percent of the population was ' ' highly. annoyed" (%HA). The surveys were of community reactions to several types of transportation noises such as road traffic, railroad, and aircraft noises. The results agreed fairly well with one another, and Schultz http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noiseltm developed an equation for describing the relationship between the level of exposure (in DNL) and percent of population highly annoyed. Schultz published the results of the surveys in 1978 in "Synthesis_of Social Surveys on Noise Annoyance." In 1992, the US Air Force updated Schultz's research with a total of 400 surveys. Comparison of the original and updated results indicate that they differ by Tess than two percent in the DNL range from 45 to 75 dB. The: following chart presents the relationship between %HA and DNL:[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN14JY00.006 The Schultz curve indicates that about 12 percent of people living at DNL 65 dB report themselves to be '.' highly annoyed". by transportation noise. About 3 percent are highly annoyed at a DNL of 55 dB. Noise Analysis Criteria for Changes in DNL. The DNL 65 dB contour remains the FAA's lower limit for defining significant noise impact on people. For a variety of reasons, noise predictions and interpretations are frequently less reliable below DNL 65 dB. DNL prediction models tend to degrade in accuracy at large distances from the airport. Smaller proportions of the population are highly annoyed with successive decreases in noise levels below DNL 65 dB. The FICO.N studied criteria for predicting changes in community annoyance below DNL 65 [[Page 43821]] dB. It found that a DNL 3 dB increase at the DNL 60 dB level is generally consistent with the existing DNL 1.5 dB screening criterion at the DNL 65 dB level.` This finding was based on using the Schultz curveto relate changes in impact level with changes in DNL. Increases of 5 dB at DNL 55 dB, 3 dB at DNL 60 dB, and 1.5 dB at DNL 65 dB all resulted in .a three percent increase in %HA. For airport development and other actions in the vicinity of an airport, the FAA guidelines for screening based on changes in aviation noise impacts above and below DNL 65 dB follow: DLN 65 dB and above --An increase in ,noise exposure of 1.5 dB or more at these levels is considered a significant addition of. noise. A Federal action resulting in such an increase would require an environmental impact statement (EIS). DLN 60-65 dB --Increases in noise of 3 dB or more that remain. between' DNL 60- 65 dB do not result in significant exposure but can be noticeable and may be highly annoying to some people. The FAA will consider mitigation options but would not require an EIS in noise -sensitive areas between DNL 60-65 dB that are projected to have an increase of 3 dB or more as a result of the proposed changes. For air traffic changes farther away from an airport http://vvww.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm FAA recognizes that some actions in areas below DNL 60 dB may produce noticeable noise increases and generate adverse community reaction. Although increases in noise in these areas are well below the standard criteria for significant impact, the FAA's air traffic screening procedures provide mechanisms to identify whether there are extraordinary circumstances warranting, an EA.Supplemental Metrics The FICON recognized that DNL can be supplemented by other metrics on a case-by-case basis, but advised continued agency discretion in the use of supplemental noise analysis. It found that the use of supplemental metrics is limited because threshold levels of significant impact have not been established and there is no accepted methodologyfor aggregating these values into a cumulative impact description. Supplemental metrics can be useful in characterizing specific events and enhancing the public's understanding of potential effects resulting from proposed changes in aircraft operations. Supplemental single event analysis sometimes is conducted to. evaluate sleep disturbance and, less frequently, specific speech interference issues. For proposed FAA actions in the vicinity of national parks in pristine areas and land uses such a wildlife refuges where the Part 150 land use compatibility guidelines bear little relevance, the FAA supplements DNL noise analysis with other metrics on a case-by-case basis. The following metrics are useful for site- specific applications on a case-by-case basis: Equivalent Sound Level (L<INF>eq</INF>) is a cumulative metric that can be appropriate where aircraft noise can affect activity periods of less than 24-hour duration. Maximum Sound Level (L<INF>max</INF>) is a single event metric that can be used to describe the greatest sound level in decibels during a given time e period at a noise -sensitive location. Sound Exposure Level (SEL) is a single event metric that can be used to describe noise exposure at noise -sensitive locations. This metric can be expressed both in terms of maximum levels and number of occurrences at varying levels. Time Above dBA Threshold (TA) is a metric that can be used in the same situations as L<INF>eq</INF>, such as measuring noise exposure within specific time periods. The designation of threshold to be used in supplemental TA measurements may be defined with respect to sPeech interference or the ambient (background), noise level. 4.3 Aircraft Research in National Parks In 1987, the U.S. Congress enacted Public Law (PL).100-91,,.the National Parks Overflight Act, which called for the NPS to recommend to the FAA actions for the substantial restoration ' ' natural quiet" to the Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP). One year later,. the FAA issued the Special Federal Aviation Regulation' http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm (SFAR) 50-2, creating a Special Flight Rules Area, flight -free zones, and defined routes for commercial air tours and sightseeing within the GCNP. Another milestone: occurred in 1995 when the .NPS presented a report to Congress on aircraft noise in national parks. The FAA and the NPS initiated a model validation process: In August 1999, the agencies hosted a two-day meeting at Grand Canyon National Park of eight internationally recognized acoustics experts (the Technical Review Committee (TRC)). Representatives from Harris, Miller, Miller and Hanson; Volpe National Transportation System Center; and Wylie Laboratories worked .with the TRC to develop a protocol that would, measure the output of various acoustic models against the actualacoustic environment in the Grand Canyon National Park. The desiredoutcome of the process is a level of confidence in the ability of the tested models to replicate the conditions found in the park. The on-site data was collected during the month of September 1999 and a Spring 2000 report is planned., The TRC will be asked to review and comment on the results. Research on Low Frequency Noise The issue of low frequency aircraft noise and its impact on structural integrity and human health was explored in detail as part of the environmental assessment of the introduction of Concorde supersonic transport operations into the United` States. Potential impacts. were found to be negligible. Field studies found that the noise -induced vibrations as a result of Concorde operations cause no structural damage. In addition, the Concorde sound pressure levels at low frequencies: were found to be well below the EPA threshold for potential health impact. As a: result of these findings, the FAA concluded that low frequency noise of subsonic aircraft in a typical airport environment had no significant impact on structures or human health. This does not mean that there may not be some noticeable vibration in certain cases. Human annoyance resulting from the effects of aircraft noise induced structural vibration is a recently raised concern.. Low frequency noise and perceptible vibration may be experienced when aircraft noise levels are high (near the start of takeoff roll) and there are many aircraft events. This same combination of factors also tends to lead to high DNL levels (generally within the 65 DNL contour or higher). However, unlike the widely accepted relationship between aircraft noise exposure in DNL and community annoyance, there does not currently exist a scientific consensus or Federal guidelines on the human annoyance effects of noise -induced structural vibration. Overall evidence recently evaluated by the FAA suggests low frequency noise is snot a separate impact phenomenon, but rather is connected to high cumulative aircraft noise exposure levels. It may be of concern under certain conditions in areas already '= within the 65 DNL contour due to higher frequency noise. Perceptible vibration due to low frequency noise may be a secondary effect under certain conditions (e.g., home location relative to takeoff roll and aircraft fleet composition) in homes that are exposed to high Levels of aircraft noise as calculated with the http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htrn noise2 Page 52 of 59 DNL metric. The [[Page 43822]J FAA supports and promotes further research on this issue through FICAN. Section 5: Source Noise Reduction Commercial air transportation became.a major factor in the U.S. economy with the introduction of jet -powered civil transport aircraft into passenger service :in the early 1960's. The economic vitality of jet service triggered explosive growth both in the air transportation industry and in those cities and industries it serviced. However, as airports grew in size and importance, the areas adversely impacted by aviation noise also expanded. Despite economic and transportation benefits, as air service expanded to new corrimunities and flight' frequencies increased, complaints about aviation's noise impact became common. As noise became a major concern, both the Federal government and the aviation industry sponsored research into ways to resolve noise problems. In the 1960's, aircraft and engine manufacturers jointly developed the first generation of low -bypass ratio turbofan engines that were both lower in noise and more fuel-efficient than the turbojet engines then in use. In the early 1970s, another major technological advancement occurred with the introduction of the second generation of high -bypass turbofan engines. These research. efforts contributed to considerable progress in aircraft noise reduction through quiet engine designs. 5.1 Aircraft Source Noise Standards On July 21, 1968, Congress passed the Aircraft Noise Abatement Act of 1968 (49 U.S.C. 44709, 44715), giving the FAA its first .express authority to regulate aircraft noise through the establishment of aircraft noise standards. Beginning in 1968, the FAA developed certification standards/ first for: measuring and then for limiting aircraft noise at the source. These certification standards, which paralleled technological improvements in airplane engine designs/ are codified in 14 CFR Part 36. The adoption of Part 36 in 1969 prohibited the further escalation of aircraft noise levels of subsonic civil turbojet and transport category airplanes, and required new airplane types to be markedly quieter than the generation of turbojets that were developed in the late 1950's and early 1960's. The historical evolution of the FAA's certification standards from Stage 1 to Stage 2 to Stage 3 assisted U.S. airframe manufacturers in gaining.a competitive advantage by providing the quietest and most fuel-efficient airplanes 'available. Effective December 1, 1969, the first U.S. aircraft noise regulations in Part 36 set a limit on noise emissions of large aircraft of new design by establishing Stage 2 certification standards. Stage 2 criteria served as http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noiseltm the basic standard for engine noise and were based on then-current technology and initially applied only to new types. of airplanes. Under the Noise Control Act of 1972, the FAA was given broader authority to set limits for aircraft noise emissions. This authority is codified in 49 U.S.C. 44715. On February 25, 1977, the FAA amended Part 36 to establish three levels (or stages) of aircraft noise with specified limits, and prescribed definitions for identifying those airplanes classified under each stage. It also required applicants for new type certificates applied for on or after November 5, 1975, to comply with what are now known as Stage 3 noise standards, and to prescribe the acoustical change requirements for airplanes in each noise level stage under Part 36. The amendment was `' intended to encourage the introduction of the. newest generation of airplanes, as soon as practicable" .and• provide a compliance schedule to maximize the incentive to replace rather than retrofit older aircraft. This amendment prescribed the noise level standards for that newest generation of airplanes." The three stages of aircraft noise • established in Part 36 have been used as the noise operating limits for civil subsonic turbojet aircraft in the phaseouts of. both Stage 1 and Stage 2 airplanes. 5.2 Airplane Operating Noise.Limits--Stage 1 Phaseout When the 1976 Policy was published, it announced a program which would ultimately prohibit operation within U.S. airspace of any civil, subsonic turbojet airplanes with a standard airworthiness certificate and with maximum takeoff weights of more thanJ_5,OQ0:poinds _that had not been-shown-tomeet the Stage 2 noise standards contained in Part 36. In accordance with .the 1976 Policy, the FAA adopted regulations that inpart established a phased compliance program for U.S. domestic operations to reduce aircraft noise. Subpart 1 of Part 91 required that civil subsonic airplanes with a gross weight of more than 75,000 pounds comply with Part 36 Stage 2 or Stage 3 noise levels by January 1, 1985, in order to operate in the United States..Compliance could be achieved by (1) replacing the older fleet with new, quieter airplanes; (2) re- engining the aircraft; or (3) using noise reduction technology, such as hushkits, that has been shown to be technologically feasible and economically reasonable. for use on older turbojets. On February .18, 1980, the Congress enacted the Aviation Safety and. Noise Abatement Act of 1979 (ASNA). Title III of that Act required the FAA to promulgate regulations extending application of the January 1, 1985, cut-off date for turbojet aircraft to U.S. and foreign international operators if no international agreement could be achieved on a compliance deadline. Since no such agreement could be reached, on November 28, 1980, the FAA amended Sec. 91.303 to make it applicable to all operators for their operations in the U.S. The ASNA also mandated that certain civil two-engine turbojet airplanes with 100 of fewer seats be given exemptions from the noise rule until January 1, 1988 (the so-called ' ':small community service" exemptions). The FAA http-://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm implemented the ' service to small community" exemption for two -engine subsonic airplanes in Sec. 91.307: 5.3 Airplane Operating Noise Limits --Stage 2 Phaseout Through passage of the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990. (ANCA), Congress directed that domestic and foreign civil subsonic turbojet airplanes with maximum weight of more than 75,000 pounds must meet Stage 3 standards t0 operate within the contiguous United States after December 31, 1999. In implementing .this statutory requirement, the FAA promulgated a rule in 14 CFR Part 91, Subpart I, requiring thatdomestic and foreignairplanes that do not meet Part 36 Stage 3 noise levels either be retired or modified to meet those levels. To bring about the earliest feasible reduction of noise levels, interim compliance deadlines, for phaseout of Stage 2 and transition to Stage 3 airplane fleets were established on the basis of technological and economic reasonableness. Interim compliance options and relateddeadlines are:Phaseout Method An operator could choose to reduce the number of Stage 2 airplanes it maintains on its operations specifications for operation in the contiguous United States to the required percentage of its established base level number on each compliance date as follows: After December 31, 1994, 75 percent of its base level; After December 31, 1996, 50 percent of its base level; and After December 31, 1998, 25 percent of its base level. [Page 43823]] Fleet Mix Method An aircraft operator :could choose to increase the number of Stage 3 airplanes it maintains on its operations specifications for operation in the contiguous United States so that its fleet consists of: Not less than 55 percent Stage 3 airplanes after December 31, 1994; Not less than 65 percent Stage 3 airplanes after December 31, 1996; and, Not less than 75 percent Stage 3 airplanes after December 31, 1998.New Entrant Compliance A new entrant air carrier (a domestic or foreign air carrier beginning service in the contiguous United States after November 5, 1990) must increase the number of Stage 3 airplanes it maintains on its operations specifications for operation in the contiguous United States so that its fleet consists of: At least 25 percent Stage 3 airplanes after December 31, 1994; http://wwvv.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm At least 50 percent. Stage 3 airplanes after December 31 At least 75 percent Stage 3 airplanes after. December 31 The regulations require all operators of subject airplanes to report compliance progress to the FAA annually.They also provide separate criteria for interim and final compliance waivers. As prescribed, in ANCA, a final compliance waiver may only be granted by the Secretary of Transportation (through delegation, by the FAA) to a domestic air carrier for no more than 15 percent of its fleet and that has achieved a fleet mix of at least 85 percent Stage 3 airplanes by July 1, 1999. Any final compliance waiver granted may not extend beyond December 31, 2003. 54. ` Potential Gains From Source Noise Reduction Research Federal policy recognizes noise impacts on populations and emphasizes source reduction to alleviate those impacts. This policy initiated the Stage 1 phaseout, which subsequently was codified into Federal law. It also resulted in the establishment of Stage 3 standards. In conjunction with additional Federal legislation, the Federal government's aviation noise policy facilitated the phaseout of Stage 2 airplanes by the year 2000. In keeping with this policy, the FAA places a high priority on developing future aircraft noise reduction technology to support the continued expansion of the national aviation system. In early 1992, the FAA and NASA began sponsorship of a multiyear program focused on achieving significant noise reduction technology advances. In October 1992, Congress mandated that the FAA and NASA jointly conduct an aircraft noise reduction research program, the goal of which is to develop, by the year 2001,.technologies for subsonic jet aircraft to operate at reduced noise, levels. Current and projected funding of this project in the FAA's and NASA's co- sponsored research program will exceed $200 million by the year 2000. The project's stated goal is to develop technology to reduce the community noise impact of the future subsonic airplanes by 10 dB (relative to 1992 technology). Future Noise Standards The FAA is a major participant on an ICAO Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP) technical working group that is formulating proposals for an increase in stringency of the international noise standard for subsonic jet and large propeller -driven airplanes. The FAA plans to set new Stage 4 standards by early in the next century. New standards would result in a future timed transition to a generation of airplanes quieter than Stage 3, similar to source -noise reduction transitions that have been implemented since the 1976 Policy. The Secretary of Transportation's flagship initiative supports the development of more stringent aircraft noise standards. FAA is aggressively pursuing the http://www.southbaycities.orgiclocs/noise.htm development of international certification noise standards for turbojet airplanes that will be more stringent than the current Stage 3 standards; and, developing models to assess new noise abatement technologies that will encourage introduction of quieter planes Source Noise Reductions for Aircraft Under 75,000 lbs. Commercial and business aircraft of not more than -75,000 pounds gross weight make a significant contribution to aviation in the United States. They often.• provide the bridge between smaller communities and the major air carrier airports. Generally,this task is performed by commuter aircraft and specialized air traffic services. Privately owned business aircraft also make a contribution to :the system by providing specialized point-to-point service for corporate executives and staff. This service saves valuable time and relieves hub congestion while providing increased aircraft capacity to the system. Each of these classes of smaller aircraft makes its unique contribution to the overall efficiency of aviation. Together, they extend air service to many smaller outlying areas, both rural settings and suburban. The Stage 1 and Stage 2 airplane phaseouts affected only large commercial airplanes with a gross weight of more than 75,000 pounds. There are no provisions in either Federal law or FAA regulations that are directed at phasing out airplanes of not more than 75,000 pounds. In 1990-91, the FAA undertook a study in accordance with the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47525 to determine whether requirements governing noise and access restrictions in Part 161 should apply to Stage 2 airplanes of not more than 75,000 pounds as well as to those above that weight. After careful consideration of the various issues involved and of comments received from the public, the FAA concluded that the analysis, notice, and comment provisions for proposed restrictions should apply to all Stage 2 aircraft operations regardless of gross weight. This conclusion was based on the need to protect the interests of all segments of aviation and of the general public. The National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) passed a resolution in January 1998 that is a first step in voluntary elimination of noisy business aircraft. Coordinated with the FAA, the resolution calls for the NBAA's 5,200 members to refrain from adding Stage 1 aircraft to their fleets beginning in January 2000 and to end the operation of Stage 1 aircraft by January 2005. This resolution affects business aircraft at or below 75,000 pounds. In the absence of specific Federal legislation, the FAA encourages and supports voluntary efforts by the aviation industry that will result in reducing noise of Stage 1 and Stage 2 aircraft of not more than 75,000 pounds in gross _weight. Helicopter Noise Reduction Research 44 U.S.C. 44715 directs' the FAA to prescribe and amend aircraft noise standards taking into consideration whether the standard is economically reasonable, technologically feasible and appropriate for the applicable aircraft, http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htrn aircraft engine, appliance, or certificate. An FAA research project seeks to demonstrate the technological and economical feasibility of incorporating existing noise abatement technology concepts into the designs of light helicopters produced by small manufacturers. The projectis a technology transfer effort that will addressexisting noise abatement design concepts for individual small helicopter designs. Prototype hardware will be constructed and tested, or existing airframe designs modified, to demonstrate the airworthiness and noise reductionpotential of the noise abatement designs. The FAA - sponsored [[Page 43824]] activity is a follow-on to the similar NASA research program directed toward the larger, more technologically advanced manufacturers and involving the development of advanced noise design technologies. General Aviation Noise Reduction Research In 1994, Congress directed that the FAA and NASA jointly conduct a noise study of propeller -driven small airplanes and rotorcraft to identify noise reduction technologies,evaluate the status of R&D and determine the need for addition research activities. For propeller -drive small airplanes, the study identified the need for user-friendly tools to design quieter propellers, engine systems optimized for low noise; and demonstration of these concepts. The FAA and NASA initiated a government/industry/university partnership for acoustics technologies following the findings of the study. This research supports the General Aviation Action Plan (GAAP), which was developed by the general aviation (GA) industry and the FAA. One of the goals of the GAAP is to promote the development of new methodologies and technologies that will reduce the overall perceived noise footprint of GA aircraft. In response, the FAA and NASA are co -sponsoring a research program that seeks to identify and develop propeller -driven aircraft aircraft noise reduction and control technologies. The objective of the project is to enable U.S. manufacturers to produce quieter propeller -driven airplanes. Appendix: References Source Literature Acoustical Society of America, 1980. Sound Level Descriptors for Determination of Compatible Land .Use. ANSI S12.40-1990. Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON), 1992. Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues.' Washington, D.C.:. http:Uwww.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm 8/8/00 FICON. Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise (FICUN) Guidelines for Considering Noise in Land Use Planning and Control. (U.S. Government Printing Office Report #1981-337-066/8071) Washington, D.C.: FICUN. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection. 1995. Evolution of the Noise Climate Around Airports. Working Paper Number 59. Montreal, Canada: ICAO. National Research. Council (NRC). Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA). 1977. Guidelines for Preparing Environmental Impact Statements on Noise. Report of Working Group 69. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council. National Research Council (NRC). Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA). 1981. Assessment of Community Response to High -Energy Impulsive Sounds. Report of Working Group 84. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council. National Research Council (NRC). Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA). 1981. The Effects on. Human Health from Long-term Exposures to Noise. Report of Working Group 81. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council. Schultz, T.J.,` 1978. ' ' Synthesis of Social Surveys on Noise Annoyance " Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 64(2): 377-405 U.S. Department of Transportation. Office of the Secretary and. Federal. Aviation Administration, 1976. Aviation Noise Abatement Policy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. DOT, FAA. U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Environment and Energy.' 1984. Land Use Compatibility Study: Aircraft Noise and Land Use. FAA -AEE -84-16. Washington, D.C.: U.S. DOT, FAA. U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office o Environment and Energy. 1989. Report to Congress on the Airport Noise Compatibility Planning Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. DOT, FAA. U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. -1993. http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm noise2 Page 59 of 59 Noise Abatement Departure Profiles. Advisory Circular 91.53A. Washington D.C.: U.S. DOT, FAA. U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration: Office of Environment and Energy. 1994. Future Noise Contour Analysis. FAA -AEE -96-06. Washington, D.C.: U.S. DOT, FAA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1973. Public Health and Welfare Criteria for Noise, July 27, .1973. EPA ,Report 550/9-73-002. Washington, D.C. U.S. EPA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Noise Abatement and Control. 1974. Information ,on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety. EPA Report No. 550/9- 74-004. Washington, D.C.: U.S.: EPA. U.S Environmental Protection Agency. 1982. Guidelines for Noise Impact' Analysis. EPA -550/9-82-105. Springfield, Va.: National Technical Information Service (PB82-219205). Statutes Aircraft Noise Abatement Act of 1968 (49 U.S.C. 44709, 44715).Noise Control Act of 1972 (NCA) (49 U.S.C. 44709, 44715).Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of. 1979 (ASNA) (49 U.S.C." 40116, 46505, 47501.47508). Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (ANCA) (49 U.S.C. 47521-47533). National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) Regulations in 14 CFR Part 36, Noise Standards: Aircraft Type and Airworthiness Certification. Part 91, General Operating and Flight Rules; Subpart 1, Operating Noise Limits. Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning. Part 161, Notice and Approval of Airport Noise and Access Restrictions. [FR Doc. 00-17784 Filed 7-13-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 491043-M http://www.southbaycities.org/docs/noise.htm - 8/8/00 /11 August 3, 2000 City Council Meeting August 8, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION APPLICATIONS. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council select one of the following two options: Schedule applicant interviews for a time certain (6 p.m. or earlier) prior to the September 12, 2000 meeting, with appointments to follow at the regular meeting, and extend the application filing period in the interim, with a filing deadline of 6 p.m, Wednesday, September 6, 2000; or Schedule applicant interviews and appointments for an earlier date in August and extend the application filing period to a date certain, about one week before the scheduled meeting. Background: At its meeting of June 27, 2000, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 00-1203 to establish a Public Works Commission to review and make recommendations to the Council on all capital improvement projects, assist in the development and updating of design guidelines for City public improvements, and other matters referred to the Commission by the City Council. That ordinance was adopted by the Council July 11 and will become effective after 30 days of its adoption (August 11). ` The Commission shall consist of five members, all qualified electors of the City, serving staggered four-year terms. Sixteen applications (see attached) were received prior to the filing deadline of 6 p.m. August 2. At the time of this writing, voter registration has been verified for all but two of the: applicants. Since the Commission members must be qualified electors of the City, that verification process will be completed prior to the interviews. The 16 applicants are Mordy A. Benjamin Charlie C. Cheatham David Cohn Lee H. Grant Michael D. Keegan Brian C. Koch Lee J. Leslie Michael J. Lohnes Jean Lombardo Matt Miller James B. Paterson Phil A. Pennington Tom Ryan Hal Solomon Rick Statham Victor C. Winnek Elaine Doerfling, City y Manager Jul -24-00 02:03P'Mord Wenjamin 31 743559 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION -Public Works Commission Name: Mordy A Benjamin Horne Phone: 310-374-3559 Address: 928 14th St Occupation/Profession: Retired Government Contracts (consultant Name of Employer Bus. Phone: P_02 . // 2 4 2000... CYTyp YCLE MOSq BOH Address of Employer REFERENCES: Local: Sam Abrams 310-376-4525 (Retired. Hermosa Beach Recreation :Ind Parks Commissioner) Professional: Roman Wasylyn 310-662-9609( Hughes Electronics, :Tax Manager) Other.. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): X12 Jul -24-00 02:03P MordWBenjamin 31 743559 P_03 Why do you wish to become a Commission member'?I believe that with my.; experience in Government Contracting I can assist the City of Hermosa Beach with recommendations in the administration of Public Works projects and procedures. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? I believe that a Commission member will review Public Work Projects and Department procedures and make recommendations where appropriate. Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? explain). which could be construed as a Yes X No: Of yes, please • Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member- Education- BA, University of Maryland 1954 Cal, Berkeley, Boalt School of Law, One year, 1958 Jul -24-00 02:03P Mord enjami n 31W3743559 P_04 -Hughes Aircraft Company 20 Years in Government Contracting (Retired 1993) Instructor in Government Contracting, UCLA Extension for 5yea rS Government Contracting Consultant 1993-1999 ( Retired 1999) This Board/Commission meets on First Wednesday at 7 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes_No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Twenty one years Comments: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION Public Works C� 1 mit 1 9 2000. X77 YAM BEACH *4 10 Name Charlie C. Cheatham Home Phone: 310-374-5555 Address: 548 2Street, Hermosa Beach. Occupation/Profession: Federal Civil. Service, Senior Manager Name of Employer Department of Defense Bus Phone: 714-798-4264 Address of Employer Defense Contract Management Agency, Western District, 18901 S. Wilmington, Carson CA 90746 REFERENCES: Local: Wilhelm Sarasalo, President, Pacific Software, 310-545-7038 Professional: Steve Soderquist, USAF Space & Missile Center, Manager, 310-363-2397 Other Scott Fonoimoana, Construction, 310-600-2750 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Held position as VP for Certification with the South Bay chapter of the National Contracts Management Association. Additionally, I have been training to be a Disaster Assistance Coordinator with the American Red Cross. Also, I have attended and spoken at a number of City Council and Planning Commission meetings. Why do you wish to become a Commission member? I wish to become more active in community affairs and help tofontinue the improvements in Hermosa Beach that have been occurring over the past few years. I feel that my project management background and technical experience will allow me to fully comprehend public works projects and fairly represent the Hermosa populace. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? The Public Works Commission member's primary role is to ensure that proposed capital improvement projects and activities meet acceptable standards established by the City, and that these projects are beneficial to the populace. This includes ensuring that projects are adequately specified and that bidders are capable of performing to the contract requirements. Additionally, the commission can help identify potential public works projects for the City to undertake. Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes X No Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member: Education: • Employment: BS in Industrial Engineering, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, 1982 MS in Systems Management, USC, 1992 Architect Engineer, Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, 1977-1978. Designed industrial facilities for the shipyard. Industrial Engineer, Air Force Space Division, El Segundo, 1979-1985. Served as Manufacturing Operations Manager and Property Manager for space launch vehicles and satellite programs. Industrial Policy Manager, Pentagon, 1985-1986. Worked with Congress and other Federal Agencies to establish Service -wide policies concerning Value Engineering, Strategic and Critical Materials, Priorities and Allocations, Title III, and other national level programs. Program Manager, Air Force Space Division, El Segundo, 1986-1988. In charge of the Industrial Modernization Incentives Program for launch vehicles. Manufacturing Assessment Branch Chief, Air Force Plant Office, Douglas Aircraft, Long Beach, 1989-1990. In charge ofevaluating the contractor's manufacturing operations for the C-17 aircraft. Program Support and Systems Engineering Branch Chief, Dept of Defense Plant Office, Rocketdyne, Canoga Park, 1990-1992. In charge of engineering surveillance and program integration on NASA Space Shuttle and Space Station programs., Contract Administration Program Manager, Defense Contract Management Command, Carson, 1992-1999. Held a number of senior level positions at our Western District Headquarters. Established programs and policies on contracting practices, quality assurance, manufacturing surveillance, engineering practices, and government property accounting. Established functional automation systems for the District. Involved in a number of acquisition reform initiatives that are establishing commercial practices for Department of Defense purchases of products and services Established a Malcom Baldrige based auditing system for the Command. Supervised 50 Senior Functional Advisors who are establishing knowledge management processes and training throughout the District. Deputy Director, Contract Management Office at Boeing Space & Communications, Seal Beach. In charge of 128 government personnel performing contract management and administration of high priority Department .. of Defense programs, such as the Delta II & IV programs and the National Missile Defense program. Memberships/certifications: Member National Contracts Management Association • Certified as a Professional Contracts Manager • former Vice President, Certifications Member Order of the Engineer -engineering ethics society Received Engineer in Training (ETT) certification Senior member American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Member Department of Defense Acquisition Corps • Certified in Manufacturing and Production • Certified in Program Management This Board/Commission meets on the first Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? X No How long have you lived in Hermosa beach? 1994 to present Comments: Signed: Date: / J vL 06 Yes CITY OF HERMOSA BEAC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION' NAME OF COMMISSION Public Works Name: • David Cohn Page 1 of 3 Home Phone: 310-318-1664 Address: 631 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Occupation/Profession: Investment Banker Name of Employer Berman Cohn LLC Bus. Phone: 310-475-9230 -Address of Employer ` 10850; Wilshire -Blvd., Suite '422 , Los Angeles, CA 90024 REFERENCES: Ttibcal: J.R. Reviczky/Dr. Alice Villalobos (310-261-1015/KathyBunbabin Professional: John Muckel, CEO, Plumber's Warehouse (310) 635-6500 Other: Steve and Cindy Kinney 635 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, (310) 798-3032 COMMU TITY -PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): American Cancer Society (out of state) Why do you wish to become a Commission member? See attached Insert "A" What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? To monitor and propose capital expenditures for City Council approval Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes X No (If yes, please explain) http://www.hermosabch.org/commappl.htm Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. See attached Insert "B" This Board/Commission meets on First Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes X No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 2-1/2 years Comments: /A7A'7 `X .' .5'076b(Fj A/YD 9116 Ci 7/ 6/G/77EV1 S4e-d" fi7f— n 461-/7j)5 Aii./1 If- h44- m41o6- 'r/.( trySD ete/ /Dcr? l/C.' /e/' G/1/F- /it/ (Additional page. n be used to complete any answer.) Signed: Date: �� i � 00 0 http://www.hermosabch.org/co appl.htm 7/29/00 Insert "A" I would be well qualified to utilize my current business experience in the capital expenditure. decision-making process and related fiscal activities, while at the same time understanding the City's available financial resources. I am also an advocate of the City being extra resourceful in its selection of services and equipment within the confines of its resources. Attachment to City of Hermosa Beach Board/Commission Application Insert "B" I am a past graduate of the Washington University School of Business. As a past Executive Vice President with City National Bank, City National Financial Services, I conducted investment- banking activities for the firm's middle market clients. I also owned and served as CEO for two firms: The Dearborn Companies and Humid -Aire Corporation; both were manufacturing companies that I successfully sold to strategic buyers. I have sat on the board of a Midwest regional bank, a 600 -bed hospital, and currently serve as advisor to several companies in the hardware and home products fields. Presently, I am a principal for a firm licensed by the NASD that advises the placement of private equity money of between $100 and $158 million annually into established corporations. We are advisors to clients in preparing operating budgets and capital expenditure budgets on a regular basis. I manage the firm's Southern California office: Berman Cohn LLC 10850 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 422 Los Angeles, California 90024 (888) 291-1115 (310) 475-1851- Fax Email: dac@loop.com www.bermancohn.com CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION Name f.� a V 24,1‹ Home Phone: b - 3 "4-2.-7-3 '. • :AUC' 0 2 2Q& C/T1 OFI Address: 1 dk\ 10j.> Se�� Occupation/Profession: 5S t'A,o Name of Employer Address of Employer 3 O'CLN, ac - 61 -e -e 1��11-4�'eCL ' t ILIGJ�S�a� Bus. Phone: 0 1a REFERENCES: V,1dk Local: 113 e� (APA • {fin c erOk 1 gb '� 4 1,is et. %F• (z. `C o ele k 4 4410:6=ziefral; C -4,1A • \sceexicocise Other: �Rbce� ;;),,AA Cc s�e>tecea uM Ceu COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Why do you wish to become a Commission member? • IL_. .I_ A.--dh- What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? -0 e (5 tt,,ci;Ae Page 1 oft 4:::A 4,47avvs p„�� off sex�� ‘,\ (eSea cSA. At -1b (02 66 Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be onstrued as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resumeof your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member hku.,l:<r ;o,35) y a �W.A tM CX ; +Je--t S e Pe.* eS(t eA Ovki & e C-#iS tr `trop /fop COtti feS4 v . �°-m5vk- c•La� oL PA\ �oot;�snea: ;v��To\See �1 fi�eccsth ti. tX Trev'e tz j co -641 S Vs-S16o ckt.seC, %P.vkAcultqc�rC r 4? ) : ok..�Q,(v cist -V,01/4 o-, e oma.. torse. /recc}et-cvs(Cirvk -6 f\AwAa-A1' aixtv4;0(,-,t {t QC*. am -AAA a C sem, a-* 'Ado i"o,DO This Board/Commission meets on ( -61)(bAY. at p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems thatmight make you mis$ meetings? Yes �o How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? k CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATIO NAME OF COMMISSION Name f,c` to et ?LbJc- Wags' Home Phone: 3 jO \ Ifo ' % 9 eeega Address: Occupation/Profession: &1 f f `fess Name of EmployerilH/f f/ thI1 - Address of Employer //Z /1/, ,e fcf l'g t' Phone:. / 3W 7 S /?/vim%s / /7k /Om geeee 4/ REFERENCES: se,»J Professional: --� U,4 ftJ / �Gr �-r — - Other: 1 C k /M i, ed COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): .1('rn h •,yQs-,p TPS'/ lCEt� 4f4 /417 Lov, pvr�-e ht; f� Moeferm I if-Reee S, ' ` AF ' �. --C Js• P(,/ '�/i �..l UO , . / - � eYrJ/cc 8 5/ Why do you wish to become a Commission member? - ' 14)/ S'1- N'e r e# 46, / ' `vGm krf /11 147 7J•As c Ske % ..x 6s-1 v e - 1 What do you, eel are he duties and responsibilities o a Commission member? 411-07-1. criri ipote • 1-/-erNteaie Page 1 of 2 0'- _,tdY fie -et Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. This Board/Commission meets on p.m_ Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? '' Yes No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Comments: 7.0 iGSSi57Z1' Signed: Date: Page:2 of 2 (5/15/99) Michael D. Keegan 1107 Loma Drive, Unit A Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. (310) 798-2969 WORK EXPERIENCE & RELATED BACKGROUND: 1992 Present I opened the first bagel store in Manhattan Beach, Manhattan Beach Bagel Co., in 1992, and two years later expanded by opening the Manhattan Bread Co. Both businesses still operate 7 days a week and employ 40 people in both full, and part-time, positions. As the general contractor for both stores, I designed and built both stores which included successfully completing two conditional use permit applications for the city of Manhattan Beach In 1995 and 1996, I owned another bagel bakery in Torrance, CA, which I then sold. In 1996, I became President of the Old Town Bakery, Northridge, CA and was involved in expanding this bakery from one location to four outlets, including two at Los Angeles International Airport, which are licensed by Host Marriott Corp. I sold my interest in Old Town in 1997. 1986-1992 In 1986 I began employment Tishman West, a large commercial real estate developer, . advancing to the position of vice-president before leaving to start Manhattan Beach Bagel Co. At Tishman, I worked on the completion of one million square feet of new commercial development in Orange County and San Diego. My duties included negotiating ground leases, commercial leases, and many other service and consulting agreements. My responsibilities included overseeing a construction department that performed over four million dollars a year in tenant improvement projects in a 2.5 million square foot development. At Tishman, I gained vast experience in both Type I and Type II construction projects. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Arts in Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1985 Real Estate classes completed at the University of California, Irvine, CA, 1987-1988 Culinary classes completed at the Culinary Institute of America, Hyde Park, NY, 1996 Bread Baking classes completed at the American Institute of Baking, Manhattan, KS, 1996 Bread Baking classes completed at the National Baking Center, Minneapolis, MN, 1997 LICENSES: Licensed California Real Estate Broker Licensed California General Contractor -B License MEMBERSHIPS: Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach Chamber of Commerce Arts Manhattan Retail Bakers Association Bread Baker Guild of America - Founding Member Formerly a member of the National Association of Corporate Real Estate Executives, National Asso- ciation of Office and Industrial Parks, Building Owners and Management Association ;213'367 0937, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION Name: Brian C. Koch Public Works Commission Address: 53 Ninth Street, Occupation/Profession: Employer City of Los Angeles/Dept. of Water & Power (LADWP) Bus. Phone: 213-367-0054 Address of Employer: 111 North Hope Street. Room 1326. Los Angeles; CA 90012 REFERENCES: Hermosa Beach 90254 Civil / Structural Engineer Local: Professional: Other: Robert Beste, Hermosa Beach home phone (310) 376-3781 George Brodt. LADWP. work phone (213) 367-0854 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): I have not had the opportunity to serve on any public boards in the South Bay. but I am looking forward to participating. Why do you, wish to become a Commission member? I have lived in Hermosa Beach for almost eight years and would like to have an opportunity to help improve the community: My technical and professional expertise would fit well within this Board, and I could provide valuable input into the decision making process for Public Works Construction. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? As the announcement states: the duties of this Commission are to review and make recommendations to the City Council on all capital improvement projects, assist in the development and updating of design guidelines for public improvements and other matters - referred to the Commission by the City Council I feel that the duties are to specifically provide input of a more technical nature, regarding both specific project detail& design options: and code requirements, as well as input into the contracting process. Engineering expertise is valuable to review alternate proposals and make informed recommendations to the city Council. Public projects need to balance community needs_ technical opportunities, and economic considerations. 8- 2-00; 3: 79PM;DWP .. Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes X • : No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. Attached is a Resume. As an engineer in a local municipal department_ I have extensive experience in Public Works construction projects. including building projects. site improvements/roadways, and utility work. I deal with both in-house designers and contractor design firms, workingon permitting, specifications, design documents/drawings, and contract administration. I have also had the opportunity to serve on a public board. as an elected member of the LADWP Retirement Board, which provided experience in the workings of a publicly noticed oversight group. This Board/Commission meets on the first Wednesdays of the month at 7 p.m. Do you foresee any 'scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes X • No How long have you Iived in Hermosa Beach? Seven and V2 years Comments: My technical and professional experience and long term residence. in Hermosa Beach provides a solid base to serve on the Public Works Commission. I have been looking for a way to give back to my community. This opportunity would allow me to use my engineering expertise and working knowledgeof public works projects to provide support to the elected Signed: Date: J 2-(1.0''4' Please return completed application to the City Clerk's Office 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0204 or FAX to (310) 372-6186 or e-mail to: nvaldes@hermosabch.org Profile: Over 17 years of diversified, in-depth experience in municipal engineering, including project management, contract administration, technical supervision, budgeting, computer applications, facility design, and organizational development. Strong engineering and management background, with education and experience in business skills, customer and quality focus, leadership, recruitment, and administrative issues. A results -oriented team player with excellent problem solving, analytical, and communication skills and a high level of initiative and energy. Professional Experience: City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power 1998- present - Projects Design Manager (Civil/Structural and Electrical/Mechanical Groups) 1997 to 1998 FEMA Project Management Engineer 1995 to 1997 Executive Office Staff Engineer - Power System 1991 to 1995 - Structural Engineer ( Structural Design Supervisor 1988 to 1991 - Senior Structural Engineering Associate 1984 to 1988 - Structural Engineering Associate 1982 to 1984 Civil Engineering Assistant Projects Design Group Manager for Water Engineering & Technical Services, leading the Civil/Structural and Electrical/Mechanical Groups. The almost 50 employees in these groups design Water System tanks, pump stations, reservoir covers, maintenance buildings, groundwater treatment facilities, chlorination and fluoridation stations, and system wide. control systems. Past Responsibilities induded strategic planning related to the Energy Services reorganization, developing Business Unit budget and staffing targets, managing implementation teams related to industry restructuring, crafting organizational structure, ensuring employee communication and goal development, and evaluating budget/schedule performance. measurement. Also Project Manager for major portion of the $300 million Mead-Adelanto Project, including substation buildings & structures, and the $15 million Owens Gorge Penstock Repair and Rewatering Facilities, including water release structures and streambed restoration. Previously supervised a five -member Structural Design Squad, involved in structural design of Energy System facilities, contract administration, and project management for facility upgrades. In addition to project management, contract administration, and direct supervision, I have been the leader of Quality Action Teams, Task Forces, and Project Teams for a variety' of specific issues. Registration and Professional Affiliations: Structural Engineer - State of California #53144 Civil Engineer - States of California #C39670 & Nevada #C10411 Committee Member for American Society of Civil Engineers Member of Structural Engineers Association of Southern California Member of UCLA and USC Alumni & Engineering Associations BRIAN C.'KOCH 53 Ninth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 home phone (310) 798-5969 a work phone (213) 367-0054 Education: 1988 -1993 Master of Business Administration (MBA) University of Southern California Magna Cum Laude 1982 -1984 Master of Science, Civil Engineering (MSCE) University of Southern California Magna Cum Laude. 1977 -1982 Bachelor of Science, Engineering (BSE) University of California, Los Angeles Cum Laude. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION Public Works Commission Name: Lee J. Leslie Home Phone: (310) 374-2869 Address: 2116 Loma Drive, Hermosa Beach; CA 90254 Occupation/Profession: Corporate Attorney and Corporate Development Consultant Bus. Phone: (310) 374-2869 Name of Employer: Self -Employed Address of Employer: 2116 Loma Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 REFERENCES: Local: Ken Nudelman (310-915-4426); Brad Krasnoff (213-680-5145) Professional: Neel Grover (949-389-5683); Joe Goebel (714-889-1809) Other: Ken Nitahara (619-662-5463); Sylvia Morrow (818-222-8297) COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Board Member of Anderson Management Alumni Association; Board Member of Public Interest Law Foundation; Participant in L.A. County Bar outreach programs Why do you wish to become a Commission member? I have witnessed many public improvements in Hermosa Beach over the past five years and I want to take an active role in planning the city's future. I believe that my background and experience can add a helpful perspective to discussions of capital improvement projects and other issues facing the city. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? To discuss and n andanal ze proposed capital improvement projects, assist in developing guidelines for pubic imp make recommendations to the City Council. Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes X No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past act ties and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. Experience: Private Consultant April 2000 - Present Advise emerging growth companies regarding corporate development and legal affairs, including strategic alliances, debt and equity financings, business development, and intellectual property transactions. Clients include LowerMyBills.com and LoansDirect.com. Vice President of Corporate Development and General Counsel LoansDirect. com, Huntington Beach, CA. October, 1998 - April 2000 Managed business affairs of online lender with $1.5 billion in annual loan originations. Responsibilities include overseeing development of online operations, negotiating strategic partnering relationships, acquiring and protecting intellectual property rights, negotiating credit facilities and investor agreements, establishing employment policies, analyzing regulatory issues, and managing, litigation matters. Corporate Attorney Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP, Irvine, CA April, 1994 - October, 1998 Counseled emerging and established companies through all phases of corporate development, including private and public debt and equity financings, venture capital, mergers and acquisitions, corporate partnering and strategic alliances, licensing, intellectual property protection, executive compensation and employment matters. Represented buyers and sellers in over 20 company acquisitions, including Buy.com, Odetics and PairGain Technologies Represented companies and investors in over 20 private equity financings, including Accelerated Networks, Brentwood Venture. Partners, and Broadcom Corporation. Represented companies in undertaking initial and follow-on public offerings, including $100 million initial public offering of Broadcom Corporation. Robinson, Diamant & Brill, Los Angeles, CA October, 1992 March, 1994 Represented companies undergoing corporate reorganization. Clients included Carolco Pictures, Qintex Entertainment and the Waterfront Hilton Hotel. UCLA School of Law and Graduate School of Management (Anderson), Los Angeles, CA J.D./M.B.A. 1992 Order of the Coif (top 10% of law school class) Beta Gamma Sigma (top 10% of business school class) Editor, UCLA Law Review American Jurisprudence Awards in Business Associations, Commercial Law and Remedies Cornell University, Ithaca, NY B.A., with distinction, 1988 Phi Beta Kappa (top 10%` of class) This Board/Commission meets on Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss•meetings? Yes X No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Five years Comments: (Additional pages may be used to complete any answer.) Signed: Date: 3%Al 2q Zo oo Please return completed application to the City Clerk's Office 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0204 or FAX to (310) 372-6186 or e-mail to: nvaldes@hermosabch.org CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. BOARD/COMIYIISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION: Civil Service Board and the Parks. Community Resources Advisory Commission, Puxhu t: WorehtS Name: Michael James Lohnes Home Phone: (310) 937-2375 Address: 415 Herondo, Apartment # 110 Occupation/Profession: Contracts Leadership Development Program Name of Employer: Raytheon Company, Electronic Systems Bus. Phone:. (310) 647-3552 Address of Employer: 2000 East El Segundo Blvd, Bldg EO/E01/C182, El Segundo, CA 90245 REFERENCES: Local: Christian Navar, 79th 16th Street, (310) 766-3840 Professional: Noelia Rodriguez, Mayor Riordan's Former Press Secretary, (213) 532-7777 Other: Brent Wheelbarger, Publicist, (818) 761-2476 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): During my time at USC, I held several positions and offices in organizations which allowed me to serve the USC community as well as the greater Los Angeles community as well. These included being a Judicial Council Justice as well as being a member of Pepsters. Through these positions as well as numerous others, I earned not only an Outstanding Senior Recognition Award for scholarship, leadership, and service, but also the Mayor's Certificate of Appreciation. In the past I have also volunteered at the Boys' Club, a recreation center for underprivileged youth, in my hometown of Decatur IL Why do you wish to become a Commission member? As a resident of Hermosa Beach, I use the city to its fullest extent ranging from participating in athletics to attending cultural events. I believe one of our city's greatest aspects is the vast array of opportunities it offers its citizens to learn, experience, and grow. I want not only to be involved, but also to contribute my time, energy, and ideas to ensure this important characteristic not only stays on the right track, but also continually improves. As for the Civil Service Board, I believe it is of the utmost importance to have qualified, credible, and dedicated individuals not only handling the affairs of, but also working for Hermosa Beach in order forpositive outcomes to follow. In other words, it is the platform from which success 'is based. To ensure this process occurs, there is a need for a neutral third party to serve as the check and balance on the city's personnel. I believe I would be able to add value to the board through non -biased and researched insight. While at USC, I held the same position on the Student Senate. What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? I feel the ideal Commission member would be an expert listener. One needs to know all of the facts and options before he/she can make an educated decision. In other words, a member must always keep his/her eyes and ears open to not only create opportunities, but also move on the ones that would have a positive impact on the city and the lives of its residents: The same can be said for the importance of minimizing the negative aspects. Above all, besides actively participating in the discourse surrounding one's commission, I feel the greatest duty of a Commission member is to truly care about the city and where it is going. Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes X No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. Attached you will find a hard copy of my resume. It does not include my current employment or contact information. My current phone and address are listed above while my new email address is mjlohnes@west.raytheon.com. This Board/Commission meets on either the third WED or the first TUES at 5 or 7p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes X No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Four wonderful months Comments: I would be happy to meet withyou to further discuss my qualifications for a Commission appointment. If you have any other additional questions, youmay reach me at the above telephone numbers. Thank you for your consideration and. T look forward to hearing from you soon: (Additional pages may be used to complete any answer. Signed: Date: 8/01/00 Michael J. Lohnes 1326 W. 29i6 St. #1 Los Anceles. CA 90007 Home Phone: (323) 766-9242 Email: lohnes@usc.edu EDUCATION University of Southern California, May 2000 Major: Political Science, GPA: 3.7' Minor: Business Administration, GPA: 3.9 Minor: Sociology, GPA: 4.0 ACADEMIC HONORS & SCHOOLS Dean's List Member, Gamma Sigma Alpha National Greek Honor Society Woodrow Wilson Leadership School Ronald Reagan Leadership School Richland Leadership School Sophomore Leadership Circle WORK' EXPERIENCE Levine Communications: Sales Associate, Summer 1999 • Furthered analytical capabilities by researching and signing new clients. • Built on business and political background through planning and creating new business plans. • Gained an extensive amount of team experience by setting and accomplishing office goals. Leadership '98 — Vice President Gore's Political Action Committee: Intern, Summer 1998 Improved research ability by gathering supporter information that was entered into a political database. • Worked closely with supervisors in planning various political events. Honed communication skills by interviewing politicians from across the nation. The Office of the Mayor of Los Angeles: Press Intern, Spring 1998 Received the Mayor's Certificate of Appreciation for constructing a daily catalog of press clips that contained current information about Mayor Riordan, the LAUSD, and the LAPD. • Strengthened computer skills by working on Lexis -Nexis and other news wires. Organized the media at various press conferences, including the State of the City Address. Archer -Daniels- Midland Co. (ADM): Lab Technician, Summer 1997 • Furthered written communication skills by writing summaries about ADM's corn and soybean products for the corporate office. Tested the compositions of the same products to check for problems in their processing. ACTIVITIES & OFFICES HELD University of Southern California Student Senate Judicial Council Justice Member of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity Executive Vice President Social Committee Social Chairman Governing Committee Rush. Chairman Pledge Class President Member of Pepsters Student ambassador for the University of Southern California CITY OF HERMOSA BEAU. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION 2_ o a) 3 Name: � �fiN ��'3��p Home Phone: L3/ a Address: .,2-3(4-- 5/L tU fe ff.t)P /44/E� /1.ERfilo.5/ l"5 Atc4/ Occupation/Profession: A V-71-/ /0 P� s y.Z2/j /17.7— 1e /till - Name of Employer /P.47// Address of Employer REFERENCES: Local:�f�flh'�a �% � /614 0,12 El a1� / - Ti2EE7 hisje,y2, 54 )34,9e49 Professional: Other Bus. Phone: COMIVIUNITY.PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present); Why do you wish to become a Commission member? What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? /9 5,4 S.E.N eA/ Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which couldbe:construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes V No (If yes, please explain) http://www.hermosabch.org/commappl.htm 7/29/OU CITY OF HERMOSA BEACID Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. This Board/Commission meets on '/R'/0..E A/E's154 y at 7: ao p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? / V- 4 g s Comments: L-f� SAF .t //74L' Al/f1 /r/`/ (Additional pages may be used to complete any answer.) Signed: Date: � - 60 http://www.hermosabch.orgicommappl.htna 7/29/00 • APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION Attachment Jean Lombardo 2465 Silverstrand Ave. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 374-5389 Education Completed: Grades one thru 12 at Kansas City, Missouri public schools. Four years at Kansas City Institute of Art Two years at University of Missouri Three years at Otis Parsons School of Design Employment: Legal secretary for U.S. District Attorney for Missouri 1955 -1957 Engineering Secretary for Litton Industries at Woodland Hills, CA 1962 Engineering Secretary and Tape Librarian for Scientific Computer at Litton Industries 1963 1968 Cost Accounting at Canoga Electronics, Canoga Park, CA 1969 - 1972 Head Fashion Designer at D.B.A.L.A. a wholesale apparel manufacturer 1975 -1980 Freelance fashion designer for various wholesale garment manufacturers 1980 -1988 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE First Night - Founding member of Project Touch Car Show - Hermosa Beach celebration of the Olympics Sister City and Hermosa Beach birthday celebration - H.B. Sister City Convention - Woman's. Club Art Contest for elementary school students- Friends of the Library Fortieth Anniversary - St. Patrick's Day Parade - Candidate's' Forum for 1999 H.B. City Council election - MEMBERSHIP Woman's Club of Hermosa Beach, past president - Kiwanis Club of Hermosa Beach, past club. secretary Hermosa Beach Friends of the Library- Hermosa Beach Sister City Assoc. - Project Touch, past board member - Seize the Day, past board member - Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce - Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation, current board member California Federation of Women's Clubs, current executive committee member - CFWC Marina District, current president - Beach Cities League of Women Voters - Hermosa Beach Coordinating Council I wish to become a member of the Public Works Commission because I feel I can bring to the job my experience of working with groups, solving problems and completing tasks. I also have organization and aesthetic skills I believe could be helpful: My concerns are for the quality of life for the citizens of Hermosa Beach. I feel the duties and responsibilities of a Public Works Commission member are to consider the needs of the citizens of Hermosa Beach and to make recommendations accordingly to the Hermosa Beach City Council. The duties include being financially responsible, taking direction from the City Council and recommending items for determination at their pleasure. If a conflict of interest is found in any of my obligations to organizations, I will immediately resignfrom that organization. AUG. 1.2000 12:07PM MAT L PRODUCT FINANCE cr Y 0 HERMOSA. BEACH CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 'r. BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATI • P NAME Or COMMISSION �b\0-7o r $ ComJ."c° sStf ® NO.374 P.1/3 mmmappLhm AUG (? .] 2000 2 C` -TY CLEPY CITY:DF HEiiMOSA B :CH Name; Matt' /4 it. 1 Lr Address: 1 o Z ( 3 re -0 Sf re Home Phone: 31 O 3 I g -5-z 3 7 Occupation/Professiotr: t tit?? crlam' 113' i h eP�/'; Name of Employer _MQ; C. Address of Employer PREFERENCES: oat: .S+ePe, F -'i.1 /i.Q-s4 210� �- o- i615 11 z 11e.T ��.t1 c' ��el ofession$1: KCvr VL. � 1 c�-/' 311D-zSZ-7- 3C' 'Other: Sc0-1-1- -Y L2c -i4. J'rtta ^hQ, Aloes 3I e ."31 r-241 3 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (fast and present): mss; st-- d Jh hle bi /nsirccfro 44-- 14- ____Lyti,zs 41 s? Bus. Phone:310 - 25-Z -3-03 X33 GQ RRJ . I Se c4f4 0z4$ Why do you wish to become a Commission member? T Iv ec'-s/PzoetP tet cAmx•Lorc t}- i -to !ec rz c2 -tool ' cm-* re''`'4ied3 fz% sea et in at do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? * Le- -Crowtzi easagOsoloroth lsd•irrg¢. ,'e r.9r-s, * oolitd i one o tij:C t,..) a tikS e Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of AUG. 1.2000. 12:07PM MA. PRODUCT FINANCE interest with your being a board/commission member? • Yes X No (If yes, please explain)! 1NO.374Y-bem P.2/3ug/comm€ippl.hm. Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other expef ience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission. member. 2of3 This Board/Commission meets on t c2 erCPiic4ftwes4. at 7 p.m. Do you foresee 1ny scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes Na ow long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? g + er.+/`S omments A S a/ o s1P 7rt0.1`' 1 n .1-6(A914 ` Sitio- 5 9 a rrd S,:pto - cf T" isa `iL. 114.e. lats+ •4'61- 41(911 -LO a —1— "i0 (Additional pag y be used to complete any answer. AUG. 1.2000 12:07PM • CITY OF i ERMO$A BEACH $igued' - Date: MAL PRODUCT FINANCE *7 31(o0 Please return completed application to the City Clerk's Office 1315 Valley Drive, iiermosalBeach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0204 or FAX tq (310) 372-6186 or e-mail to: ktla mosabch.Qra Homepage City Intbrmation Commission information CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION Name �/�HytLG Address: /4068 C.S.77/6-46/ Occupation/Profession: 2. .� U1.// -/c/) Lc Hoe Bus. Phones 7/0 - 83 2- - eS 3 17/.2-- Name of Employer �. � f' Address of Employer ZoD.5 wv /1i/DPL t '2 Woof ?'4`1'L)/A/ ,2 //e/A (._54>v. ,c22 REFERENCES: Local: /e, Aqi 1911/7 ,a.>od /417 134-4 /2/L. i/e - ,' /v --iii -/.5` eD Professional: /17,1-/- /jf3� � �.¢ / f�/� ,4'/o, C, % 73 2- •'.11,5)00 n /7-771L(T cIc �u //17,,eV�� Other:(<7.t/ y COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Zei/o/..4 I' i p(41/.//c//,./c7. f e /ba,,+/C jsf-str,(ZiAGS/ xie./Ppropfi //✓Cf - C ; /9/ ?/y (4.9-Td/� .� /ale G C J /_ 6„„.‘z / 1�t�A j= l fid ^.7 f/k 11 'i" P Why do you wish to become a Commission member? Ace 7-- o c -! Kms, 2 s ava T y What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? /o .i/e AVD "Ikea' / CO AI.i, lio e 5 !r a / y . _ o 9dfa‘1,.../6 gve t/3/c - 4e7 1! !%/9 e r e' d 4/ 5t Page 1 of 2 7 o youhave any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of -interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. f%/'r / c/, r ---S r'/t7 F( ,//e_ /f63 /9: % 7-16/W/4-4. 2) X A 01/11%%4 ; �,`444-A ( lf1 04,e6, 796 This Board/Commission meets on /t'/(,/'. 6Cli07i_ at 7 % 0 7 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes X No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Comments: L , fic/0/r' 49,kQ5 O. 441 .0rIr / Signed: Date: Fir Page 2 of 2 (5/15/99) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION Pu2i- LD o k5 C00404( ss 10 r‘ Name 1. H t �1, :e in +n ,vt Address: IL op Ag_to ljU (22 Occupation/Profession: De e ult1 L. A - Cm Name of Employer Sc (c Address of Employer REFERENCES: 22_4 Home Phone: t 0J 3 2f 1 14 I 2 t4e,e(2- ) Bus. Phone: - ZJ Local: it t-evles - f Professional:"� ►� i 4 - Sc,, ). - (3 Co) zz i -313 i S ves� 4. rooK< Q L, A, £ xtn..49Z�.t rneee 0) ieu1O of -PIA -101"-c- COO�j Do" v hey- , GLt. L► -C-�u a-�-eL 122.41 reds) (di C cL Other: ,r - we -A_ l 1o2; of 3w) 3" 16Y CO P 'ROTATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Mewactizv'-- L Co, $c.cLcAA. CDmvo-tsS t VI. FrieK:4S 1-Ais -artc4Q &/e4-1 t �e - r Pis, oe�t Qtver-L'441 4\LLvtt rt' AS5oc -/ V P- Ll -I JwritAitaw. A1Lt 1 CeL:.' n,e-13— v ev. Leci. wA. ? T t g'+ / 6, 'fir ale 1-,'c. C I'W (4-Z, M Fitt SO •l=c es - lk kris ,A } ,,,r71eusS�c��O2t�- C ��� - 6.01 Why do you wishto become a Commission member? 9--n-f.5 fol2 C 1-�r '�''' �cL �" t°ict CeeAN 6-A- 1 e A.P,-b 0.E 1 k ptr Q e L'i't- f �1.tti 1 •� Ga r1 v�-1fl 1 L t ' 6 -re- I d . s �- (I h a. 4.1.s ► k (AA -A +0 serge,, What do you feel are the duties and res onsibilities of a Commission member? 1 -butes Ccok- 0, t-•ev t. x) oT )�S LS Oct v 'MktG t C0 i c -1, G..-r� 6,6144.04..issifir•- ., U T Cov►�t Vt.� t Ss:1"d% W �d V. -4(11w t�Yto tis 1e.• a� t a t e a,t,..-�. �•- > Qd� Nt on. ClSca,t4 � .2L�►^6 AT C, COu,u h, 1- Page l.of2 4 once VIgs»9, C�,l, Pratt/Kelt /A-e-11-4"-AnnC ") 3-72 -‘1181. C) ,, 1_ __ �. es4s: 1 Pavkv' - s.say- 1^'`-c„ L }-1 Al \R l at.e s; . D,5: G r J24/- Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could b construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? _ ` Yes ✓ No (If yes, please explain) L , A - , cam(,. Cow. . SS be_ CSS(� �_ (-f f-)-y�l71�� ` ct is' ru I . o`C'e `e,v, 1i� 1/V 7JL 12-6 6 s 'COY C Qi"`f'l ` / L(1 �G 1( -.24 Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you` as a Board/Commission member. 4 De w'jr) G. c - , vl 2t.r /Dc ree'Su-r Cf F 1WAL. , A • LO “tit- ct "t" . A. Pepto e - e . M . s . u C L.R . L A c J-Av h%. Lodi, ALA -0,0-Z„ 4 S ac,s Th.e.5,AA DV (2.,c r. -t a (i! Al 1 s u: k (1, Ciw,ia, nis • kms. 0 F LA. (1�s) L,R.Cv: = ►Iwo �v�� (--°w.nt Ssivw (fget- 6 cev.) 12e P -s-kc y 6,AA• ¢ ►'►^-Qti'E_ Cam ,nti i s 5 , Cox eG (►SSS -e . O CFVTV UK c_Q(' & L•; A. Ctv1G CeiAk►r t i L -A. (C,ct.-Cuv6e.v‘uk Co c-\DL6--: (_ -1-1-3 k �5 t r6 V`ors oo (te t gSS O This Board/Commission meets on at p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes No ' .. a ',,, �'t'C.i/ �gL.Baf { OW�'►t?V` � 0 - �i�S6n.. How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? I 60-5 Comments: l'l. clQ.;$. ‘;-C., A-0 d -'r v.A.A6 L l c.er Ices ue1r.► o, PcCk a 3- e -u v 6;A.-- COs -8g) ch -i),1. -t_ + .--1-t.t►,,,,. - .1rivt.a►.6 Name. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION Public Works Tom Ryan Address: 1640. Loma Dr. #1 Hermosa Beach, -90254 Cy JUL 2 S 2000 CITYTY CLEH F AOsA BEAC. Home Phone: (310) 798-6363 Occupation/Profession: Project Manager Name ofEmployer Metropolitan Water District Bus. Phone: (213) 217-6140 Address of Employer 700 N. Alameda St., Los Angeles, CA 90012 REFERENCES: Local: Dan Ryan, 1241 9th St., Hermosa Beach (310)372-7863. 9 yr. resident, Member of Chamber of Commerce Professional: Ane Deister, Exec. Asst. to General Manager, MWD, (213) 217-6144 Other: Jeff Blume, 6 Eastwind, Marina Del Rey, CA 90242 (310)247-4510., X217 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Big Brothers of Greater Los Angeles, Valley'Mayors Fund for the Homeless Why do you wish to become a Commission member? . S e attached answer #1 What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? See attached answer #2 Page 1 of 2 Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes mc No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and, other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member: See attached answer #3 and Resume This Board/Commission meets on 1st Wednesday/mo. at 7:00 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes xx No Seerattached answer #4 How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? See attached answer #5 Comments: Signed: Dater 5 —00 Page 2 of 2 (5/15/99) Attachment - Answers to Public Works Commission Application 1. I am new to the City and want to become involved with the community, broaden my experience in addressing municipal issues, and meet new people. 2. I see the Public Works Commission as acting in an advisory role to the City Council: The Commission is to use its best technical ability in reviewing and making recommendations on proposed capital improvement projects. Another primary function is to use its creativity and professional judgement in assisting the development and updating of the City's public improvement guidelines. ` The new Commission will also address, perhaps through research, other issues assigned to it by the City Council. 3. I have over 15 years of experience as a project manager in public works. However, this experience involves water resources planning at federal and regional levels. Many features of public works are common to all projects whether it involves renovating a building or constructing a new pipeline. These features are: project objectives; proposed design; alternatives; environmental impacts; cost/benefit ratio; public acceptability, and; schedule. I can use my experience with large scale projects on proposed projects being considered by the City. I have managed dozens of public works projects, supervised scores of consultants, and have personally been responsible for contracts totalling millions dollars. I am currently the project manager for the planning process for a $70 million project to line an earthen water supply canal running through Riverside and Imperial Counties in the southern California desert: Ihave 11 years of CEQA experience which includes using aesthetics impact methodology and cultural resource coordination. My, experience also includes working on committees, with the public, governing bodies and elected officials, and meeting deadlines on time. 4. My work entails travel within the southwest and I regularly have out-of-town meetings. However, I do have some degree of control over the timing and location of such meetings. There may at times be scheduling conflicts beyond my control, but I do not believe that this will become a problem for the Commission. 5. I moved here in June, 2000. My brother and his family have lived here for nine years and I have visited often. I am familiar with the City. My experience in this area began in 1986 when I did the planning for the Army Corps of Engineers repair of the Redondo Beach breakwater. THOMAS JOHN RYAO EXPERIENCE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES, CA 10/1994 - Environmental Specialist, Coldrado River Resources Branch Present Project manager, manage consultants, and also provide technical support as part of a team responsible for negotiating water conservation agreements and operating plans for meeting Metropolitan's goals for maximizing its Colorado River supply. Manage water supply project planning, and protect the agency's interests with regard to water resources and quality. Successfully planned capital improvement projects. Monitor federal policy setting, and interact with other California agencies with water delivery contracts and with representatives from the other six Basin States that use Colorado River water. 04/1988 - Manager, Environmental / Legislative Review Section 10/1994 Developed and directed complex environmental programs to ensure that water supply projects complied with federal, State, and local laws and regulations. Planned and conducted intensive public involvement and decision-making processes to reduce legal exposure for controversial projects that had a major impact. on the District. Managed public involvement, environmental, and engineering consulting contracts. Served as liaison between regulatory and member agencies. Supervised . entry-level employees who conducted environmental investigations, prepared pro forma environmental documents, and managed small projects. Reviewed legislation that could affect the District, and recommended: input strategies. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 01/1986 Geographer /Environmental Coordinator 03/1988 Prepared environmental documentation and technically complex studies for public works projects to ensure compliance with federal laws. Duties included coordinating teams of specialists, surveying, budgeting, negotiating with resource agencies, public involvement, and managing contracts. EDUCATION CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY 1986 Graduate Study in the Department of Geography. 1989 Completed all coursework for the Master of Arts degree, December. 1989. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. NORTHRIDGE, CA LOS ANGELES, CA 1985 Graduated with simultaneous Bachelor of Arts degrees in Geography and Political Science with. an Emphasis in Resource Management. Served on Academic Senate Committees. PERSONAL Interests include travel, adventure sports, and current events.. REFERENCES Available upon request. 1640 Loma Drive#1, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 798-6363 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION R' B L1:- C Name //141.— & 4 L 0/1404 Home Phone: 0/0 374-/ 772 Address: 718 /-+h S'T Occu ation/Profession: e T 'T 2 i� / Po i4 4-1.m e_, WA A -Naz e .H e Nf (0AIW %la wt p J WoRKs Go 2. mos'? Bead Name of Employer Address of Employer REFERENCES: 1 A Bus. Phone: Local: R Re U l C. (•)/ Professional: Been.;,E 1/1 Q1SS, Other: Pe2Sory (, C-1:14/ +2_ S "e.►1:M oN S COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present):ez-1v. GcQrd''ept cone ' >7epthe,e o f -tie /lie -fog -7 ljtitse 4c visory co.1 /Wee, We, h 4-ue; to eienr v i ee r vy s inic.e Mit 2c,/ z000 Ito Y7 14-1( no iss vEs SND --0 �� �� r e CO M M 2.fvddIons 7'0 'fI `e G ly-Ceudvc-i 1 An Re.so Iu-f-cen. Why do you wish to become a _Commission member? As Q y e 7 r r` es i d e&t o f '- S14 Vecc.Q u_3aeifc/ c&,ylzniu' 10 see os l Jk. Aeuy es ?N 4642, cis/ b e -b •e.42- yvNY .e cicica:74rn1 e / A-evc% O tes /071mi bctcjz hov�vd� ore_ iu 1/ sujieI'Ito be an €. e o'ra' 6o hien issz,lee. ib w.-{ f Ce�r» c �e-- (/2 e , hFv e;i. flys -i' f, -f-o cls cote .+ ' ' Fos�`�e0r1 oP�efip,.5 What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? 1h� ©-E G pos../ f row re P_Qv/Eur a ►id rcu e.. R€e© mmenvclQSfo4s el Got',v0 0 e c . i► .v, - ro ,n e /D ec s 0.5.51 /NAe cl.2velo- M'e Att. a n d cloclmitivQ o . cJeSI J guic&J'(/es' 7 02 4147/1 iinpro c ie s''/ Page 1 of✓2 , U4rQseE Ey weoi34330176 o) 37V-7229' Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed asa conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes (VNo (If yes, please explain) Please give a resumeof your education,employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. 4L-1-Ao:,z,a:-f-ics/` 104 'MRA lry y posi roty be-Forke, re_.+1r2em w"s V P OPeadtoz.s r�-f > ikt ure _Eye ,ear`. rIV 4 Yeas heir g rou: t_ ny f o M (8 h4 (11107A i -a o Wt, 1110,1 st9/es f Rorvt 4.1" e • to s 4 / 0. wu. ed C is. Sedevtce,revcosz.Y,Qeia-, Sysi-72,4r rgfui clls172i6ofro,s., /- r //vg/.es A-12ePt,1FT. /✓7 tJayeI op to 2,06 -employs ujd 4 ,bud7et .ero vvst.bi/1 hes®Jei_ #30rvki-itigen 4d/ltrS. Ory a nizafterewiiS et d vees-2 r^oor Go,-, s �s//ni .-r G (ecf-P-4c4i E‘Cly)wee25) 4042iu u1 4 .eGf2ica. ca nc( 1%vrec/ia rtii . 41vic(:ams' t21&(- A act to y •42.4.rS e erpoeuc /-1-5 ri'oj ecJ wa vick:re ,3a is Gc p&cufy CM CL 1/.1 Cx-ri b0i /iV-e2.lvice_ cc. rte/ ex lee/valer-6JecfS: Mit ere by ©h ) e1i i s cs-t.d. es -1-44 (ts4ece scrhedule_. ethc bue-f cerfetu2 be/,.c.ve -114Q_ comb/ No frog o T / ir r v c rl et ha' �► am ay e e ex /iPn/r-z care ct3 J/, S u/ 7 c/ -2 ?c.,2 (o/.c UJoie Go1,41,A�ss�o� This Board/Commission meets on FiRsT Oe_choesdA at 7 ` 00 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meeti s. Yes t/No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? 7 1` ea_i. S Comments: Signed: Date: d ? �/927 Page 2 of 2 (5/15/99) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH http://www.hermosabch.org/commappl.htm CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION NAME OF COMMISSION PL,4-ivii/Aik Name: gc.,A, 5774--Tif-,¢-!j Address: y/z 7/7.44/4,47-T �•c) Occupation/Profession: G I AUfi `S IC clrYaFHE;;COE'i EE;c: Local: 1 of 3 oyer zdegs pet,/ki f( get,. Awedd l Home Phone: (3t p) g3 7 -7G 5/3 yero2600 1c/4Sr V 4,1 3,41 • ,Ai Bus. Phone:010 -3513S Ria/7 A/41) &I- 9& 664 / 199 l Com) e.7n.3 Ccs ii4-) Mel Ldp Other: A e C t'i hP_ teat ata LtC. J (f 2 —2.5 3 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): 4N6- 63i -Ali+ rad re,c,A t'# .. Ado wt 'La CGI1 y Ore; o.✓0 OLC. , ,.• l Sevoradt years CLeteuebris trek_ Dt41:01e-S kSeg/ W.0 ahs._ �Kt� �(��/CITL' , } Seedte4i ! 6114,!,t t s %t Why do you wish to become a Commission member. 7 LzvLc4, tke -, 4A , i ✓e$ (.ies e- in wt c 6'47 c Q-F/cAG-G rel k's t# J £ •e€et&u c- z' eo+- k e -C tbalJe 4 IA( Gc What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Co het.40.k., rG,s )t1i*) IbU) &' be s5 /leaerue Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which couldbe construed as a conflict of interest with your being a board/commission member? Yes pc No (If yes, please explain) 8/1/00 8:34 AM, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH http://www.hermosabch.org/commappl.htm: 2 of 3 Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. SPG A -M z$J,<_, This Board/Commission meets on at p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes )(No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? a/-7' %v /f it 5 Comments: (Additional pages may be used to complete any answer.) Signed: Date: D2oa Please return completed application to the City Clerk's Office 8/1/00 8:34 AM. QUALIFICATIONS SUMMARY RICHARD J. STATHAM 412 MANHATTAN AVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 (310) 937-7643 (H) (310) 647-3538 (W) Twenty years of contracts experience including 19 years in the defense, international, and commercial electronics contracting areas. Current position as Senior Manager for Sensors and Electronics Systems (SES) with overall responsibility for contract activities involving North East Surface Radar and SES Business Development organizations. Also, provides leadership to the Raytheon Company Contracts Training Program by' implementing contracts, legal, business, and finance classes. PROFESSIONAL 1981 -present Raytheon Company, (formerly Hughes Aircraft Company) EXPERIENCE Currently, Senior Manager, Contracts directing all contractual matters concerning SES North East Surface Radar and Advanced Programs Divisions New Business activities. Reviews and approves all sales proposals (domestic and international), contractual documents, strategic alliances and proprietary agreements. Directs and assists in the preparation of cost and business management proposals. Develops strategy for successful customer negotiations. Providescontractual counsel to Segment and Division management. Actively participates on the New Business Development Team with increasing number of International, commercial, DoD and NASA technology- oriented prime programs. Participates on all marketing and capture teams as well as any acquisition or divestiture related activities. EDUCATION_ In 1997 was team member in the sale and divestiture of the Hughes Lexington Kentucky 'Facility: :1979-1981: Independent contractor for various laws firms providing legal briefs, analysis, and documentation support. • Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 1975 Juris Doctor, LaVerne College of Law, Los Angeles, California, 1979 UCLA Executive Marketing Program, 1995 USC Management Development Program, 1996 Hughes Advanced. Leadership Program, 1997 Instructor forthe Ethics Training Program in the Contracts Organization and Engineering Divisions • Established structure, oversight, and guidance. for the Hughes Aircraft Contracts . Training Program PROCESS MANAGEMENT. SECURITY CLEARANCE 'AFFILIATIONS • National Contracts Management Association Department of Defense - Secret (Special Access) HONORS Legal: ' Matthew Bender Book Award for Uniform Commercial Code Name CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BOARD/COMMISSION APPLICATION. NAME OF COMMISSION /'U 1 I t �' UjcTO& C cNafkf Address: Occupation/Profession: A -I Reptese.� „4sv-t.. 134v j_cti.w O0e Name of Employer Ro bar, + La --4- le y 9,. OO 7 A ii (.\ fi tie nuc [Jo r Ks Home Phone: (3(c)) 3 76- fs/ 6 q . /4e ryvtos ae.a.-4 Cit Ga sit Address of Employer 6Sa REFERENCES: Local: Mir' Lo.vr 1).tfritt15 A e , 6—lcd ✓C C t acc Bus. Phone: (714) S G o - of ct , `Savt1 t 74K`•,C/# q,7.7 Professional: Other: My. - /14 l4�le. L/IS aLt P / "J4Q.rMos t 13ewG� 3023 0 E_.1. y ipe✓.k,l . /-4toy. C A c 6Q2S<-) *-3 o /3re 0-4 qa�� 02`16 l3 )� %..cs A ?ales, cA dao COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past_r and present): -1":Ltwve 1t1UcLUeh tvn `j'I.�is Coa7ntvtu,� 1 )/ cIt✓ectI/ Cc CJ�eSive. 'ho crl ,C.4. VGI(reJ tvt 14-e. CoL;1 Viay z p1c4.4A-/ +<4 s� l� -1 4.- V0Lu4e.e.,ed L4 c 44,1 USC meLCewee.v� 6-04d 5. ,14spy j i'UIJ%t sOVeeoc,‘,.c we claim -4 wetA�l Why doyouwish to become a Commission member? I 4-04- ° lo -e. moo We, t.4,+1, eu{-uve o c (te.,vmos,. gefrah w Etive. s s eX/'!evieµce '(o L // 1A. , Cyou) -j'k✓uvgk %4S ., inRAsfvu��lvv� Ca�t44,i iw.f�vvut.wewi'S J J1 / / s t pA 0(1-' f U 1i / C, 11 VGv 144..J. e. 1/1"/ lO tnn2 .. e4.51; What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? -1e Cd -.1 CcuvtciI A,s 110 j,/ ytd 4.6( ek,A4,1vZiv� Yevte. w� aE(ev�wy �.1�-e.�►n,,a-�+rc� id eas 4-0 Pis Vc t.,-iovk tssoe fats d 4-0 ^f 1 c1.1)/ oC &1' s4,. ,. j -a a.6s;$4 .41,,t . CC yr . aw 4-4 bS-i e�{.fx,kv ty 2�1.c42w4Jse�cecwifeCwp(.4-w1 �fr;,.1.pL� tic, 2Mriau4 /1.~1s:•4 y tiu*e4,us Page 1 of 2 y . ..e1ket. Cv��e • Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities, which could be construed as a conflict of interest.with your being a board/commission member? Yes X No (If yes, please explain) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Board/Commission member. rrolJGA:FtCIn Ovli Ugvs'tty 0c wesiI-'LusK? e /e..5 LA- kJ (�1.4l tie -vs .� S o-Pft a vrt C.,1 Cc.,vet ZI.1). f:q �/T. Po�a tC.� SUe fe (q eimilluks;s ide.rw(KJI /0 4..1 yvue,vin E/Kplay LctiJ d ICFlev ��..�1' y 741-40vKti WC!✓Pe vs CG.-LteK$<iftt, C - ((ol y' 13�ttte v - l l #�;,.M.Q f //e..“-‘,41 i 1& / , I crs Cuv.neKs4�a..4 �y�viSu�kuC� 0v""1.7e Court11 00-4-24- 14-44y e — kw Clea -1 �Ce%LKKN/ 1\el4.e J jYl c/V��1ilk& .w c4&-:.(Ze�✓ese.,-F /i4 &i ceJt.. l,ce. � Cc.,cS+� s Fvew.c&4 Cc, Pot 1,1S`. -{ (CJ K ,:t2S, Cd • — .1.14tJe5f(74 �✓ CtiuwP.,.vc 4 Co, 4,17vsv S 5 E A-1TA-CNg7D R Esu 4 4 c) C. V. This Board/Commission meets on w nesa-°1/4y at 7- 0 u p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? g yec.Y's fo c,1-- s e y / >v er 01,t/4 u 4u Comments: 'i tM- ' / a.a oe 4-0 q: uv,iuei Page2of2 VICTOR C. WINNEK, Jesuit educated, he graduated from Loyola High School in Los Angeles and went on to the University of Southern California where he receiN•ed his Bachelors of Arts. In 1996 he was conferred his Juris Doctor from the University of West Los Angeles, School of Law where he graduated with distinguishing honors of Law Review and Am Jur awards. Mr. Winnek is experienced in human resources, labor negotiations, risk management, business operations and development. He serves as . Chief . Operating Officer of the California Football Officials Association and has served on their Board of Directors for 8 years. Mr. Winnek has a strong background in medical -legal issues which has proven vital to his success in handling worker compensation matters and litigation involving medical procedures. During the past ten years, Mr. Winnek has become well versed in the technical aspects of workers' compensation, insurance defense and employment law litigation, in addition to appellate law. He has vast knowledge of subrogation and products. liability cases. His strong public speaking skills, superior negotiating and tenacious work ethic have been keys to his .success. His leadership and management has resulted in firm profits. Additionally, his client relations proves to be an invaluable marketing tool. Mr. Winnek is employed by Law Offices of Robert Wheatley where his duties include appearing at trials, conferences and hearings before the Workers Compensation Appeals Board; handling contribution issues and conducting settlement negotiations. His negotiating skills have saved clients millions of dollars. He appears : on',behalf of clients, such as, Montgomery Ward, Ralphs . Grocery Company, AIG, Pacific Bell, Liberty Mutual Insurance and Golden Eagle Insurance to name a few. Prior to this position he worked for the law firm of CalIopy & Bather. At Callopy & Bather, Mr. Winnek managed all appellate matters and, supervised paralegals and clerical staff in addition to developing new business. He also coordinated all . litigation investigations. Working as a Certified law student for the Orange County District Attorney, Mr. Winnek received vast practical experience. He was assigned to the Writs and Appeals unit and the Felony Panel where he successfully conducted more than 120 preliminary hearings, trials and evidentiary hearings. before the superior court. He was also responsible for writing and arguing criminal appeals, as well as law and motion matters. Prior to that position, Mr. Winnek was a law clerk with Liebman, Reiner, McNeil & Walsh. Mr. Winnek handled over seven hundred liability and workers' compensation cases where he negotiated case settlements with favorable results. He is experienced with indemnification, restitution and subrogation matters arising out of personal injury and employer liability cases. He appeared at depositions and hearings in addition to doing legal research. Mr. Winnek gained experience as a claims adjuster for Crawford & Company where he managed litigated insurance claims. Hired by Fremont Compensation Insurance Company as an investigator, he conducted workers' compensation, medical malpractice, fraud and subrogation investigations. When Fremont Compensation dissolved their in-house legal and investigation departments, Mr. Winnek went to work for two investigation companies - concurrently: Phil Brady & Associates, and VTS Investigations where he is retained regularly as a consultant. Academically, Mr. Winnek served as Symposium Editor for his law school's law review and as a teaching assistant in Advanced Legal Research and Writing. As editor, he produced 'articles and created an eight article symposium on California's "Three Strikes and You're Out" felony sentencing policy. In 1995 and 1996 he received Am Jur awards. Interestingly, during college Mr. Winnek was a firefighter -paramedic and played football. After his playing days, he coached at Loyola High School and then began officiating football. Presently, he can be found Saturday afternoons officiating collegiate football games. He is the NCAA Instructional Co-chairman and a member of the NCAA Rules Committee for the .CFOA South Bay Unit. EDUCATION: VICTOR C. WINNEK 432 Eleventh Street # 2 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 376-8169 University of West Los Angeles School of Law, Doctor of Jurisprudence, 1996; University of Southern California, Bachelor of Arts, Political Science, 1985 - L987; Linfield College, 1983 - 1985; HONORS: • Law Review 1993-1996, Executive Editor, Symposium Editor and Business Manager • Am Jur Award, Criminal Procedure • Teaching Assistant, Advanced Legal Research and Writing Joint Education Program, University of Southern California Dean's List, University of Southern California LANGUAGES: Bahasa Indonesian and Malay; college course -work in Spanish and German EMPLOYMENT: Law Office of Robert Wheatley, Santa Ana, CA 1999 - present, Attorney -Hearing Representative: Worker's Compensation Insurance defense law firm. Appear at trial, Mandatory Settlement Conferences, pre-trial conferences and lien trials: Primary function is to negotiate settlement of issues and cases. Write Petition for Reconsideration, Appellate briefs, Petition for Writ of Review, Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Review by the California Evaluate medical -legal evidence; prepare pleadings; summarize medical records, employment records, and other discovery. Market clientele: Callopy & Bather, Brea. CA 1994 -1999, Attorney -Law Clerk: Worker's Compensation Insurance defense Iaw firm. Oversee, research and write all appellate matters including Petition for Reconsideration, Appellate briefs, Petition for Writ of Review, Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Review by the California Supreme Court and District Court of Appeal. Appear at trial, pre-trial conferences and hearings, as well as lien conferences and lien trials; conduct depositions. Evaluate medical -legal evidence. Assist attorneys in litigation and depositions sit second chair in fraud and complex trials: Negotiate settlements and liens; prepare pleadings; summarize medical records, employment records, and other discovery. Market clientele. Orange County District Attorney's Office, Santa Ana, CA 1995 -1996, Law Clerk: Assigned to Writs and Appeal division, handling "Three Strikes", Major Felonies, Police Misconduct, Search & Seizure and Miranda issues. Write and argue trial briefs and misdemeanor appeals. Prepare, write and argue motions, opposition to motions and appeals. Represent the Prosecution in Superior Court at hearings to: suppress evidence, set aside information and indictments, disclose informants, change venue, dismiss Preliminary hearing errors and demurrers. Take de novo testimony and conduct voir dire. Examine and cross-examine defendants, police officers and witnesses.' Assist attorneys with arraignments and preliminary hearings. Perform extensive legal research for hearings, trials, appeals and training seminars. Sit second chair in felony trials. Assist Special Operations Unit with Orange County Bankruptcy case. • Law Offices of George i -I. Ellis_ Los Arigeles, CA 1995 (I•ebruary September). Law Clerk: Products Liability and Insurance defense law firm. Assist attorneys with trial and organize trial notebooks. Perform extensive legal research; handle all law and motion matters; prepare pleadings and defenses; propound and respond to discovery. Summarize medical records, technical manuals, depositions and other discover}. Evaluate evidence and expert witnesses. Supervise and conduct product liability and accident scene investigations.. • Liebman, Reiner, McNeil & Walsh, Los Angeles_ CA 1991 - 1994, Law Clerk: Insurance defense law firm, Worker's Compensation, Subrogation, Liability and Insurance Fraud. Negotiate settlements and liens; propound and respond to discovery; prepare pleadings; raise and prepare defenses; summarize medical records, employment records, depositions and other discovery:: Evaluate medical -legal evidence. Assist attorneyswith trial; appear at pre-trial conferences and lien conferences. Perform extensive legal research and locate witnesses. Organize and supervise investigations. (Firm became McNeil, Callopy, Bather & Ross) • Fremont Compensation Insurance Company. Los Angeles. CA 1989 - 1991, investigator:.;. Worker's Compensation, Fraud, Product Liability and Governmental Subrogation, Medical Malpractice. Conduct worker's compensation insured and employee level investigations; AOE/COE, specific injury, continuous trauma, stress claim, serious & wiliful and 132(a) investigations. Examine accident sites, collect evidence, determine owner liability and manufacturer/distributor liability; prepare cases for subrogation and indemnification proceedings arising. from product liability and/or municipal, county or state government involvement. Supervise subrosa investigators. Investigate medical malpractice claims for Physicians - Surgeons' Insurance Group. Handle insurance fraud cases and investigate fraudulent medical facilities. • Crawford & Company, Atlanta. GA and Los Angeles, CA 1988 - 1989, Litigation Adjuster: Administer Liability, Causality and Worker's Compensation claims from date of notice through settlement or adjudication. Evaluate most effective legal strategy and proper case management. Coordinate defense strategy between defense counsel and insurance carrier. Establish most advantageous jurisdiction and venue. Determine eligibility of claimant and extent of coverage. Manage disability and indemnity payments, arrange medical examinations, appraise losses and rate disabilities. EXPERT CONSULTATIONS: O Los Angeles County Grand Jury, Los Angeles, CA 1993. Worker's Compensation Fraud O VTS Investigations, Walnut, CA 1990 to Present, Subrogation, Worker's Compensation issues, Insurance Fraud and Litigation Investigations PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS: • Board of Directors - CFOA, South Bay Unit: President and C. 0.0 • Association of Trial Lawyers of America • California District Attorneys Association ACTIVITIES: • NCAA & Federation Football Official • NCAA Football Rules Committee Instructor - CFOA, South Bay Unit • Member Linfield College's 1984 National Championship Football Team • Kappa Sigma Fraternity -Vice-President, IFC Representative • Volunteer Hospital of the Good Samaritan Emergency Room • Volunteer Los Angeles County - USC Medical Center, Major Trauma • Firefighter / Paramedic, McMinnville, Oregon, and Los Angeles, California