Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/25/90%.20 CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the moat economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government • revenues and/or public conduct. All • ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the • ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports .-.City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since. the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public ?arking in the central business district. "It is never too late to give up our prejudices." -Henry David Thoreau AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 25, 1990 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Chuck Sheldon MAYOR PRO TEM Kathleen Midstokke COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Robert Essertier Albert Wiemans Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: California Rideshare Week, October 1 - 5, 1990 Fire Prevention Week, October 7 14, 1990 CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) (b) (d) (e) (f) (j) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Special meeting of the City Council held on Monday, September 10, 1990; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on Tues- day, September 11, 1990. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Recommendation to receive and file the August, 1990 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #21325 for a three -unit condominium at 1301 Cypress Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 17, 1990. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #21198 for a three -unit condominium at 801 Bard Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 17, 1990. Recommendation to award bid for air conditioning for the jail and computer room in the Police Department. Memo- randum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dat- ed September 17, 1990. Recommendation to approve Chamber of Commerce request for sidewalk sale in the downtown business district Oc- tober 12 and 13, 1990. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated September 13, 1990. Recommendation to waive parking fees and time limits for meters between 8th and 16th Streets during Sand and Strand Run from 7 a.m. until Noon on February 10, 1991. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated September 15, 1990. Recommendation to approve temporary use of General Fund money to obtain bus passes and ticket books for sale to the public on Municipal Area Express (MAX). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 17, 1990. Recommendation to accept the donation of new carpeting and tile in the Community Center from the Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated September 17, 1990. Recommendation to approve contract amendment - workers' compensation consultant. Memorandum from Personnel Di- rector Robert Blackwood dated September 18, 1990. Recommendation to approve agreement with the County of Los Angeles and adopt a jurisdiction resolution, overlay of Valley, Ardmore and Prospect, CIP 85-137. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated Septem- ber 17, 1990. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1046 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO ADD INSTALLATION OF AUTOMOBILE AUDIO EQUIPMENT AND ALARMS AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE C-3 ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1047 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE REVOCATION AND SUS- PENSION OF BUSINESS LICENSES. For adoption. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY AN AMEND- MENT TO AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW MOTORCYCLE REPAIR. AT 638-640 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 17, 1990. 6. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF 3 -UNIT SUB- DIVISION AT 588 - 20TH STREET. John Miller, appellant. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 19, 1990. (Note: Public hearing on this item will be opened and continued to the October 9, 1990 meeting.) MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. REPORT ON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. MERGER PRO- POSAL. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 19, 1990. 8. PRESENTATION OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT BY IN- FRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVICES. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 18, 1990. 9. APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF CITY YARD SITES. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 18, 1990. 10. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CURBSIDE RECYCLING. Memoran- dum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dat- ed September 18, 1990 11. SEWERS TARGET AREA 4 - CIP 88-406. A. REQUEST FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR SANITARY SEWER RECONSTRUCTION. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 17, 1990. B. REQUEST FOR INSPECTION AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICE PROPOSAL. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 17, 1990. 12. RECOMMENDATION RE. TOXIC SURVEY CONSULTANT FOR PROSPECT HEIGHTS SURPLUS LOTS. Memorandum from City Manager Ke- vin B. Northcraft dated September 20, 1990. 13. REVIEW OF 4 - 10 SCHEDULE. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated September 18, 1990. 14. POSSIBLE PROCEDURES TO EXPEDITE COUNCIL MEETINGS AND CLARIFY CITIZEN INPUT OPPORTUNITIES. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 20, 1990. 15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 16. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Appointment of Planning Commissioner to fill term expir- ing June 30, 1992. (Continued from September 11, 1990 meeting.) (b) (c) Appointment of Board of Parking Place Commissioner to fill vacancy for term expiring July 27, 1993. Memoran- dum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated September 17, 1990. Final action involving City Council reorganization, with resolution for adoption. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated September 12, 1990. 17. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, September 11, 1990, at the hour of 7:36 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 6:34 P.M. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 regarding Personnel Matters, City Manager evaluation; Government Code Section 54956.9(a) regarding Matters of Litigation, City of Hermosa Beach vs. Charles Todd; Government Code Section 54956(b) regarding Potential Litigation, 1) Gilberto Medina, 2) Regulation of Liquor Licenses, and 3) Sister City Association. The session was adjourned at 7:20 P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mary Rooney, Director of Community Resources ROLL CALL: Present: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon Absent: None PROCLAMATIONS: Coastweeks, September 15 - October 8, 1990, and "Adopt -a -Beach" Coastal Cleanup Day Sept. 22, 1990: Will be from 8:00 A.M. until Noon at the Pier Head, beginning with a clean-up of the beach and continuing with festivities and games. Accepted by Director Mary Rooney. South Bay Senior Services, 15th Anniversary, Sep- tember 13, 1990: Established in 1975, the South Bay Senior Services works in nine cities in the South Bay area to help keep the elderly in their own homes through programs of assistance and home care. Accepted by Albert Appel, Chairman of the Advisory Council for the South Bay Senior Services. PRESENTATION ON LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE PROPOSED CLOSING - Ron Cano, City Manager, City of El Segundo (Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft with resolution for adoption). El Segundo City Manager Cano explained the tremendous financial impact to the South Bay Cities (7500 jobs, $310 million payroll, $2 billion lost contracts) and the large cost to the taxpayers (up to $1 billion) for the proposed relocation, not closure, of U. S. Air Force Base in El Segundo. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5402, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF RETAINING THE LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE/ SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION AT ITS PRESENT LOCATION IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO." Motion Essertier, second Mayor Sheldon. So ordered, noting the objections of Creighton and Midstokke. Page 1 Minutes 09-11-90 (2) Mayor Sheldon called upon Ted Porter of Southern California Edi- son Company to explain the reason for the loud noises emanating from their plant in Redondo Beach on Monday night. Mr. Porter said it was due to a release valve on a seldom used stack. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (k) with the exceptions of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (j) Essertier. A no vote for item (i) was registered by Wiemans. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on August 28, 1990. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 34545 through 34643 inclusive, noting voided war- rants Nos. 34547, 24548, and 34593. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the August, 1990 monthly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated September 5, 1990. (e) (f) (g) (h) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #21305 for a two -unit condominium at 634 First Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 4, 1990. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5403, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #21305 FOR A TWO - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 634 FIRST STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Easter Seals organization. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 30, 1990. Recommendation to accept as complete sidewalk repairs, CIP 89-142 and authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 4, 1990. Recommendation to approve change in staffing for Cable Television coordination. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 4, 1990. Page 2 Minutes 09-11-90 (i) (j) Recommendation to table indefinitely an update of the appraisal for South School. Memorandum from City Man- ager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 5, 1990. Councilmember Wiemans registered a no vote. Recommendation to approve plans and specifications for Basketball Courts at Clark Field, CIP 89-512, and au- thorize staff to advertise for construction bids. Memo- randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 4, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the staff recommendation. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objection of Midstokke and Wiemans. (k) Fire Association MOU amendment. Memorandum from Person- nel Director Robert Blackwood dated This item was withdrawn prior to the meeting. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1045 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 5- 9 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING BOATING. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 90-1045. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Item (j) was discussed at this time but is .listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE REPLACEMENT OF AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION/SNACK SHOP WITH NEW GASOLINE PUMPS, A SNACK SHOP AND A SELF-SERVICE AUTOMATIC CAR WASH, with resolution for adoption. (Con- tinued from June 12, 1990 City Council meeting.) Memo- randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 4, 1990. Supplemental letter from concerned residents with petition containing 51 signatures. Director Schubach presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Page 3 Minutes 09-11-90 The public hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak against the appeal was: Brian Rechsteiner - 3800 E. Alameda, Burbank, representing the Mobil Oil Company. Coming forward to speak in favor of the appeal were: Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty -Fourth Street Gloria Kolesar - 714 Tenth Street Shu Miho - 731 Ninth Street Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place Sam Lennox - 845 Tenth Street The public hearing was closed. Action: To deny the appeal and to adopt Resolution No. 90-5404, entitled, ',A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING WITH THE PLANNING COMMIS- SION DECISION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW A SELF- SERVICE CAR WASH IN CONJUNCTION WITH GAS SALES AND A RETAIL SNACK SHOP AT 931 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LE- GALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 11 THROUGH 17, INCLUSIVE, TRACT 223.", amending the hours of the car wash to a period of time from 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on weekdays and from 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on week -ends. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the objections of Midstokke and Wiemans. The meeting was recessed at 8:47 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:00 P.M. 6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO ALLOW CAR STEREO AND CAR ALARM INSTALLATION AS A PERMITTED USE ONLY IN THE C-3 ZONE SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND TO PROPOSE ADD- ING SAID USE TO THE C-3 PERMITTED USE LIST, with or- dinance for introduction. Memorandum from Planning Di- rector Michael Schubach dated September 4, 1990. Director Schubach presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak on this matter was: Jim Kirby - 24 Eleventh Street, spoke in favor of the ordinance The public hearing was closed. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1046. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered. Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 90-1046, entitled, 'IAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO ADD INSTALLATION OF AUTOMOBILE AUDIO EQUIPMENT AND Page 4 Minutes 09-11-90 ALARMS AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE C-3 ZONE WITH A CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGA- TIVE DECLARATION." Motion Creighton, second Mayor Sheldon. AYES: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon NOES: None MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS FOR ACQUISITION OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS SURPLUS LOTS AND TOXIC SURVEY ANALYSIS. Memo- randum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated Sep- tember 5, 1990. Supplemental Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property, September 11, 1990. Action: To approve the staff recommendation that the City Council: 1) Authorize the Mayor to sign the acquisition agreement for purchase of the five Prospect Heights surplus lots for $250,000 2) Authorize an agreement for a toxic survey of those lots, not to exceed $8,000 3) Authorize the Mayor to sign all related docu- ments in furtherance of this action on the recom- mendation of the City Manager and City Attorney. 4) Include the recommended change by the City At- torney on page 8 of the agreement, end of the 1st paragraph, after the phrase, "Opening of escrow ... (delete period and continue) and the deposit, plus all interest accrued thereon, shall immediately be returned to the buyer." 5) In addition, an amendment by Mayor Sheldon was accepted that the Council examine the results of the preliminary study bids at the regular meeting of September 25, 1990, to estimate what the actual expenditure would be for the study to determine the extent of toxic threat. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. 8. RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE ON CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 6, 1990. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-5405, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENABLING ELECTED COUNCILMEMBERS TO ENSURE THAT ALL EFFORTS ALLOWED BY LAW ARE FULLY EXERCISED IN ORDER TO CONTAIN, CONTROL AND PROHIBIT THE ILLEGAL SALES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES.", changing the word "drug" on line 14 and on line 20 to the words "substance abuse". Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. Page 5 Minutes 09-11-90 Further Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1047, changing page 3, line 7 from "five days" to "ten calen- dar days“. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 90-1047, entitled, 'IAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE REVOCATION AND SUSPENSION OF BUSINESS LICENSES.” Motion Creighton, second Essertier. AYES: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon NOES: None Item 10 was heard at this time but is listed in order for clarity. 9. RECOMMENDATION FOR UTILIZATION OF PROSPECT SCHOOL HOUSE. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 30, 1990. Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter were: Jack Andren - 521 Gentry Street Dale Hoffman - 1120 Sixth Street Richard Rowan - 1103 sixth Street All of the above speakers expressed concern about activity in the park, mentioning many calls to the Police Department, and concern about the rear area of the Prospect School House, suggesting fencing and nighttime lighting. All were agreeable to have the building used as storage, and all were agree- able to a use by the Historical Society. Proposed Action: To table the item until the six month lease period for the Historical Society has passed. Motion Midstokke, second Mayor Sheldon. Proposed Substitute Action: To expedite the re -roofing of the Prospect School House with as much community in- volvement as possible to free a portion of the appropri- ated monies to be used to outfit one of the rooms for City storage. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. Substitute Action: To re -roof the Prospect School House as quickly as possible, using community volunteers wher- ever possible, and to defer making a decision on the use of storage for six months to allow the Historical Page 6 Minutes 09-11-90 Society to decide whether they wish to use the site Motion Creighton, second Midstokke. So ordered. 10. HISTORICAL SOCIETY LEASE AGREEMENT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 30, 1990. Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter were: Rick Learned - 1727 Monterey Blvd. Jeannette Carr - 1602 Hermosa Avenue Edie Webber - 1201 Eleventh Street All of the above speakers were in favor of approv- ing the lease at the Community Center. Proposed Action: To approve the staff recommendation to waive the fee of $937 per month for a one year lease at the Community Center of Room #7 and Room #6D. Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. Proposed Substitute Action: To approve Alternative #5, on page 2, consisting of a month to month lease that would be terminated with 30 days notice if a request for lease space from a non-profit agency should arise, with no charge for the first three months and 50% of the nor- mal charge thereafter. Motion Creighton. Died for lack of a second. Substitute Action: To approve the waiver of fee for a six month lease for Room #7 with the understanding that an alternate location would be found by the Historical Society by the end of the six month period, and to ap- prove the waiver of fee for an indefinite lease on Room #6D. Motion Mayor Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objections of Essertier and Wiemans... 11. RECOMMENDATION TO CALL FOR BIDS - FENCE REPAIRS AT COM- MUNITY CENTER AND CLARK FIELD, FY 1990-91 CIP 89-506. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated August 23, 1990. Director Antich presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the City Manager's recommendation to proceed with item la) the repair of the concrete walls of the Community Center along Ardmore Avenue, at an es- timated cost of $5,000 which requires a formal bid, and with item 3) the replacement of damaged fencing around the lawn bowling green, at an estimated cost of $3,300 which requires only an informal bid. Motion Mayor Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered Page 7 Minutes 09-11-90 noting the objection of Creighton due to the potential liability of someone being injured in a Little League game because of the lack of appropriate fencing. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Northcraft announced the Grand Opening of the Hotel Hermosa combined with a Chamber of Commerce mixer on Thursday, September 13, 1990 from 5:30 P.M. to 9:00 P.M., and that the City of Hermosa Beach was cur- rently working with the City of Redondo Beach regarding their concerns over the proposed expansion of the opera- tions of the Southern California Edison Co. plant, that an Environmental Impact Report is expected in October, possibly by the next meeting, that could show some im- pact on our community. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Council committee assignments. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated August 29, 1990. Action: To approve the current committee list with the exception of changing the League of California Cities Delegate to Mayor Sheldon. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered, noting objection of Midstokke. (b) Appointment of Planning Commissioner to fill term expir- ing June 30, 1992. Councilmember Midstokke declined to participate in the selection due to an applicant being a former spouse. The remaining four Councilmembers split in a two -two tie vote on every name placed in nomination. Action: To continue this item to the meeting of Septem- ber 25, 1990, to allow further review of applications and interview notes with the understanding that it is improper to discuss the appointment with the public, staff, or Council. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Proposed Action: To consider an emergency item under Government Code Section 54954.2, requiring a four-fifths vote, to appoint a replacement for Betty Ryan who had resigned Monday, September 10, 1990, from the Board of Parking Place Commissioners. Motion Creighton, Second Essertier. Motion died due to the objections of Midstokke and Wiemans. Page 8 Minutes 09-11-90 CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Coming forward to address the Council were: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, concerned about the proposed merger of Southern California Edison Co. Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty -Fourth Street, reporting on his referendum to repeal the Coun- cil ordinance zoning the Biltmore site as residential. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, September 11, 1990, at the hour of 11:14 P.M., to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tues- day, September 25, 1990, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. 0(ia.fMa- (la5 Deputy City Clerk Page 9 Minutes 09-11-90 Jacklynn A. Tagliaferro 934 Seventh Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 213-379-3730 Dear Sirs, SEp-1Ernbe-r- \c( 1 I am not a writer, but I am going to attempt this letter to bring out several points of interest that were never mentioned in various articles on South Bay Cycles. RECEivEU SEP 2;1990 Mr. Campbell applied for and received a C.U.P. permit to operate a car leasing agency. Several neighbors were opposed to this, while Jerry Compton highly supported it. The city and neighbors were led to believe that a car brokerage was to open. Near the shops completion signs were put up saying South Bay Cycles - Harley Davidson parts and accessories. Needless to say the neighbors were shocked. After several neighborhood complaints to the city Mr. Campbell then, and only then attempted to obtain the necessary permit for a motorcycle shop. The shop is presently selling Harley-Davidson apparell and there is already too much noise and traffic related to Harley-Davidsons in the area. The shop owners keep saying ',Give us a chance,' to let them open and show that they can control the noise and traffic. There has already been an increase in traffic and noise. These shop owners have not been fair. They have already had confrontations with neighbors. It was only when the neighbors really started opposing with petitions of over 100 signatures, that the shop owners attempted to try and win them over. A bit late. I, as a concerned neighbor am opposed to the opening of this shop. I see no way of controlling the increase noise and traffic it will have thru out Hermosa. atit'f- 7'14— SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION N249 27IA StrutHermosa Buck Ron Nina CA 10254-2438 City Council Building & Safety Director City Manager City of Hermosa Beach SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1 0 Res CURBSIDE RECYCLING I agree with b'lenor Lynn, Wilma Burke, and the majority of others who spoke at the Public Hear- ing regarding curbside recycling AGAINST a rate which would be charged. Also this EASY RIDTR article states that almost half that returned the survey didn't want to be charged: Easy Reader, August 23. 1990 Recycling -R pens, , and bottles forccurbs de recycling., �-_ • Almost half of the residents; - however, added that they wouk(nyt support citywide curbside recy'..- cling efforts if they were charged' for curbside'recycling City officials: are now giving.` t,;rhaide recvclin anrithor`'1t, According to a August 22, 1990 article in the DAILY BRR$LE (which I have made copies for everyone) : Western Waste Industries isn't going to charge Carsen residents for the recycling program. Please follow in Carson's footsteps. At the store I a■ charged a "California Redemtion Value" on containers. I turn in my containers for the redemtion value. To charge me a curbside recycling fee would be an unnecessary "double charge". -044,141c Yv�, Daily Breeze WEDNESDAY ZONES August 22,1990 ♦civ hauling pact re -awarded to Western By Lisa Pleedl STAFF WRITER Carson on Tuesday re -award- ed an exclusive commercial trash -hauling and residential recycling contract to Western Waste Industries. The action reaffirms a similar contract granted to the compa- ny in June and revoked earlier this month when other waste haulers complained they were 9enied a chance to submit com- petitive proposals. City officials _: Tuesday said Western Waste offered the best program. Under the agreement, the company must implement the residential curbside recycling program within 60 days of sign- ing an official contract. The decision means residents will now have trash hauled one day per week. Recyclable cans, i.`glass and newspapers will be picked up on another day. Cur- -,rently, Western Waste picks up .;trash twice weekly. share any -revenue from the sale of the : ecyclables with the city. The program will allow Carson to I comply with a new law mandat- ing that cities reduce their trash flow 25 percent by 1995. Western Waste also received exclusive rights to haul all com- mercial and industrial waste be- ginning in five years. City busi- sesses now may choose from more than 20 companies. Four other firms submitted proposals for the two-part pro- gram in the past two weeks. Officials for BFI Waste Sys- tems offered to operate the re- cycling program for $1.29 more than Western per household per month, but said they would give the city 82.5 percent of the revenues from sales of recycle- blew. They said the savings would actually tower residential trash- - bills in the long run. City officials disagreed. In recent weeks, a number of local haulers and business own- ers said awarding an exclusive. contract would hurt the rii • ' business community. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council September 17, 1990 City Council Meeting of September 25, 1990 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS October 9, 1990 Certificate of Appreciation for Planning Commissioner Carl Moore Pay phone agreement Extension of Macpherson lease Sale of City Vehicle to Downtown Association for Loreto Amendment to the ICRMA liability program to allow participation of Costa Mesa, El Segundo, & Upland Implementation of no left turn sign- ing on 30th St. at Ardmore Ave. Slurry sealing, call for bids CIP 89-170 Final report of Cable TV Board 5/16 Review of 4 -hr. no parking restriction for sweeper 8/13 Caltrans letter re. PCH peak parking Request to approve Firefighters' Association Memorandum of Understanding amendment Public Hearing 3rd Quarter General Plan amendments Housing Element revision Revised Park Master Plan Selected inconsistent areas east of PCH Responsible Agent General Services Director City Manager City Manager Risk Manager Public Works Director Public Works Director General Services Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Personnel Director Planning Director Community Resources Dir. October 23, 1990 Approval of a joint powers agreement for compliance with AB939 - State Recycling Law Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" 5/3 Energy Conservation report Award construction contract for basketball courts Fee recommendations resulting from User Fee Study 8/14 Municipal Pier modifications Public Hearing Text amendment to allow outdoor display in commercial zones November 13, 1990 Pedestrian jogger crossing mid - block at Greenbelt intersection January 8, 1991 7/30 6 mo. review of Farmers' market March 12, 1991 Historical Society relocation alternatives Utilization of Prospect School House Building Director Public Works Director Building Director Public Works Director Finance Director Community Resources Dir. Planning Director Public Works Director Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Vehicle parking on pedestrian streets Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council Council Goal 2 Goal 4 Goal 8 City Mgr. Council City Mgr. Council Council Council City Mgr. 5/8 Discuss financial arrangements on oil project 5/8 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project 5/16 Options to direct dial to City Hall 5/16 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function 5/16 Options to increasing service level of street sweeping 7/24 3 -hr. vs. 2 -hr. parking meter limit in the downtown (refer to VPD) 7/24 Review Rule XV & parking fees for employees in 6 months 8/20 Gann limit - Appropriations subject to 8/14 Review of standard CUP conditions 8/14 Obtain consultant's review of Cable Co. ascertainment 8/14 Review ways to enforce no parking in front yards 8/22 Joint meeting with Chamber of Commerce City Mgr. 9/4 Recommendation on Council Chamber chairs 3 City Mgr. Planning Dir. Gen. Svcs. Dir. Finance Dir. Public Works Dir. Gen. Svc. Dir. Personnel Dir. Finance Director Planning Dir. Gen. Svc. Dir. Planning Dir. City Manager Finance Director MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Monday, September 10, 1990, at the hour of 7:03 P.M. ROLL CALL: Present: Essertier, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon Absent: Creighton (arrived at 7:05 P.M.), Midstokke 1. ROUNDTABLE INTERVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS Mayor Sheldon informed the Council that in the interest of obtaining the fairest interviews, the applicants would be called one at a time, and that basically the same questions should be asked of each in turn. Coming forward to speak to the Council and to respond to Council questions were: 1) Edmund M. Aleks 2) Gila Katz 3) Robert B. Marks The meeting recessed at 8:05 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:09 P.M. Coming forward to speak to the Council and to respond to Council questions were: 4) Julius (J.R.) Reviczky 5) Glenn R. Tanner At the conclusion of the interviews, Mayor Sheldon stated that it would not be appropriate to take a vote of any kind or to even discuss the applicants at this time; that all Councilmembers should review their notes, not lobby one another, and make their decisions independently. At the next night's Regular Meeting of September 11, 1990, the procedure would be for a Councilmember to make a motion, placing an applicant's name in nomination, and if the motion received three votes in favor, that applicant was appointed. Mayor Sheldon further stated that the tapes of the interviews, both audio and video, would be available for review. City Manager Kevin Northcraft announced: 1) the Hotel Hermosa was having its Grand Opening in conjunction with a Chamber of .Commerce mixer and Ribbon Cutting Ceremony on Thursday, September 13, 1990 from 5:30 to 9:00 P.M.; 2) a tour of a drilling rig site in Huntington Beach, leaving City Hall by bus on Thursday, September 13, 1990, at 12:30 P.M.; and 3) there was another Commission vacancy, since Betty Ryan had just tendered her resignation from the Board of Parking Place Commissioners. Page 1 Minutes 09-10-90 Cl ADJOURNMENT The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, was adjourned on Monday, September 10, 1990, at the hour of 8:52 P.M., to the Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, September 11, 1990, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk Page 2 Minutes 09-10-90 V m • 9 • • • • s 0 2 2 2 3 3 3 3i 3' 5' s2 53 54 56 Q CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH .u3 ° TIME 12:20:18 u+ti..w,. , FOR 09/25/90 rnc.t QOUL DATE 09/20/90 3 PAY VFNT11R NAMF VND f ACCOUNT NUMIIFP TRN # AMOUNT IN'J.LREF PO # CHK 5 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 4f ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC -.'i DATE EXP H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015."; .,:001-400-1101-4304 00321 $2.21 00931 34648 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 : ' CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 50.00 09/18/90 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00322 $5.08 00932 34648 ` DIRECT -DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 30.00 09/18/90 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00327 $5.99 00931 34648 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 ' CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00328 $15.97 00932 34648 0 DIRECT -DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 ° H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 :., 001=400-1131-4304 .00247 $3.15 00931 34648 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90:. ._. ...CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00248 $8.41 00932 34648 DIRECT -DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00349 $5..99 00931 34648 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE • $0.00 09/18/90 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00350 $15.97 00932 34648 3 DIRECT -DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00369 $5.05 00931 34648 CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 3 ' H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT -DIAL 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00370 $13.45 00932 34648 CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 50.00 09/18/90 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00379 $18.29 00931 34648 90 09/18/90 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 5 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT -DIAL CHCS/SEP 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00380 $48.75 00932 34646 90 09/18/90 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00383 $7.57 00931 34648 ' 09/18/90 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE$0.00 09/18/90 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT -DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00384 $20.17 00932 34648 • 09/18/90 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 50.00 09/18/90 e H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED.. TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00271 $51.93 09/18/90 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00931 $0.00 34648 09/18/90 8 c c G l l 1h ,' 23 � a; 5 8 13 14 5 4111, ,8 io 19 20 zl ` 5 0 2 e e • • w • • e e O FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 12:20:18 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAGE DDG' DEMAND DATE 09/20/90 FOR 09/25/90 an # VNP_# • ACCQ.UNT NUr1FR TRN # AMPUNI 1Ioz -nuc s DATE EXP NAMEIAMOUNT UNENC 6 PAY DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 34648 7 e 00932 ,6 H GGTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001--400-1206-4304 00272 $24.38 0032 09/19/90468 ,1 DIRECT—DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE ,2 00931 34648 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00217 $5.99 0931 09/19/90 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE i 6 3464 15.97 00932 8 ,6 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00218 $i 0932 03!14890 DIRECT—DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 9 'o ' 00931 34648 zz H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1208-4304 8-4APPROP0085 /TELEPHONE 3.15 0931 03!14890 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/9024 23 • ze H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1208-4304. 00086 $8.41 00932 34648 DIRECT—DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE 09.20 09/18/90 zc 27 2n 20 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00656 $218.47 00931 34648 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 30 3, 32 33 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00657 $332.00 00932 34648 DIRECT—DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 34 35 75 31 $3.15 00931 34648 • 30 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00291 3 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 FIRE /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 39 40 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED .. 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00292 $8.41 00932 34648 DIRECT—DIAL CHCS/SEP 90 09/18/90 FIRE /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 42 43 45 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00327 $20.46 00931 34648 t5 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 46 4I as 3' H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00328 $11.77 00932 34648 16 DIRECT—DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90-. ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 54: 5, 52 53 30 40 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00332 $15.14 00931 34648 41 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 PLANNING /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 55 56 :, 42 43 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00383 $40.35 00932 34648 4, DIRECT—DIAL CHCS/SEP 90 09/18/90.• PLANNING /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 •-;6 50 GO c, 46 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED .00015 001-400-4201-4304 00358 $24.28 00931 34648 47 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 BUILDING /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 62 63 64 cs :n 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00359 $64.73 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00932 ' 34648 Sn DIRECT—DTAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90: .- BUILDING /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 66 67 ca 69 , z 70 72 r ,5 74 i5 r51 6i 1• CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ,,,w,.,-----4...0 TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/20/90 PAY VFNDOB_LNAME vND # Af'('f uNT NUM13F9 TRN #i AMOUNT 3 6 7 6 ___INVi_REF__...____-_.___.P.O._;1"_--.._._CHK_It DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ° 9 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00387 $99.19 00931 34648 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 3 io i2 .2 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00388 $89.10 00932 34648 DIRECT -DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE . $$0.00 09/18/90 .3 .s 16 ' H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00523 $21.38 00931 34648 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $0.00 09/18/90 .6 . zo "' :/ :9 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00446 $9.15 00931 34648. TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/12/90 21 22 2. 24 H GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00447 $24.38 00932 34648 DIRECT -DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 25 26 2, 26 23 2.7 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00264 $3.15 00931 34648 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 PARKS /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 30 3. 32 '' GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-6101-4304. 00265 $8.41 00932 34648 DIRECT -DIAL CHGS/SEP 90 09/18/90 PARKS /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 33 34 36 ° 7.0 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00379 $53.88 00931 34648 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/18/90 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 3' 3° 39 2 ,3 H GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00380 $100.87 00932 34648 DIRECT -DIAL CHCS/SEP 90 09/18/90 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/18/90 , 43 . 39 Sr *** VENDOR TOTAL tr+ru*vera#trttt+3rirrrtrtrirtrer*irarirarirtrtrarir+rjrtr*trrr*irtrittrirtrirtrttertrtrtr**irtrirara*air*trtrit#*+r*# $1, 434. 95 qc 40 41 3' ° 4, HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00369 $216,515.82 34544 PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-90 09/04/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 09/18/90 n s. 52 '' 42 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00370 $289,190.55 34649 PAYROLL/SEP 1-15,1990 09/19/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 09/19/90 5i' 64 ss 56 43 4.: HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 ; -.105-202-0000-2030 00204 $5,698.86 34544 PAYROLL/B-16 TO 8-31-90 .09/04/90 ' /ACCRUED PAYROLL .$0.00 09/16/90 r9 60 4' 40 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 109-202-0000-2030 00005 $522.55°t 34544 PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8--31-90 09/04/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 09/18/90 6z 63 64 49 s. H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 110-202-0000-2030 00205 $49,776.0655 34544 PAYROLL/8-16 TO B-31-90 09/04/90- • /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 09/18/90 6, 52 53 s4 6B 60 ,5 n >4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DFMAND 1 TST - PAGF (1004 J TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/2 ' NAME VW) it ACCf1UNT NUMBER TRP11L_ AMOUNT INVLREF PO ';E ' CHK_U__ 2 6 e , 10 11 13 .EAY VENDOR DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 145-202-0000-2030 00200 $1,955.20 34544 e PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-90 09/04/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 30.00 09/10/90 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 155-202-0000-2030 00201 $832.43 34544 PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-90 09/04/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 09/18/90 4 Is 16 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 160-202-0000-2030 00199 $7,261.29 34544 PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-90 09/04/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 09/18/90 , i9 20 1 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 170-202-0000-2030 00055 $21,088.16 34144 PAYROLL/8-16 TO B-31-90 09/04/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 09/18/90 z, __ 23 24 1" H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 . 705-202-0000-2030 00163 $6,797.00 34544 PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-90 09/04/90 /ACCRUED PAYROLL $0.00 09/18/90 25 29 2, 28 25 30 31 3a ., 23 *** VENDOR TOTAL atatat********************tt********************tart***************tt***** $599,637.92 -. H POSTMASTER 00398 001-400-2401-4305 00167 $375.00 00259 34645 BULK MAIL/ANIMAL LICENSE 09/11/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/18/90 3334 3s ,6 .5 :0 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************tt********************************************* $375.00 3, 3n 30 4 0 J1 32 n H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00429 $71,285.68 34644 RETIREMENT ADV/AUG 90 09/06/90 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT $0.00 09/18/90 „l 43 4 4 3.1 35 39 **it VENDOR TOTAL stir*******************tit*stir**iter************************************** $71.285.68 , 46 4, M 3f 36 33 *** PAY CODE TOTAL a tat**************************************************************** $672.733.55 .. ',1 . i0 41 R A-1 COAST RENTALS 00029 001-400-3103-4309 01046 $221.76 105671 00081 34654 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 05671 08/31/90 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/19/90 '' .13 44 .5 *** VENDOR TOTAL at*atatatatatatatatatatat*atatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatataratatat*atatatatat*atatatatatatatatatatatatatatarataratat+ratatatatat $221.76 y.. ... �, ., -, 97 4C1 R ADVANCE ELEVATOR 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00393 $80.00 24074 00003 34655 ELEVATOR MAINT/SEP 90 24074 •09/01/90 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/19/90 51 1 62 63 64 40 0 51 *** VENDOR TOTAL a tatatatatatatat#atatatatatatatatatat*atatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatat*atatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatat*a *** . $80.00 �6 6, 6! 52 53 54 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 001-400-2101-4307 00238 $143.66 16161 00920 34656 REPAIR RADIO CHARGER 16161 08/29/90 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE70 $143.66 09/19/90 9 ,1 R 55 55 ':: , 3 ,4 75 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ANC EFA34O nnn 2. TIME 12:20:16 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VENDOR NAME _YND # ACCDUNLNUMBER_ TRN it AMOUNT__ DATE 09/20/90 PO.. ft ....__._..CHIC..__"—_- UNENC DATE EXP z 3 _°_ '7 e _INV/REF_._..._... ..._.. DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 0 a *** VENDOR TOTALaaaaaaaaaaatitit+titatitatttttttttitttttit****iaatitteittf*at;ttttt** tit•tttt•uitatntttttttt+tittrititttttattFitn•tttt $143. 66 9 w „ t3 12 R COMMANDER ANTHONY*ALTFELD 00774 001-400-2101-4316 00590 $184.41 REIMB BOOKS/FALL 1990 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAINING 00925 ' $0.00 34657 09/19/90 ,s '3 : 4 15 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************ttttitatttit************ r*at*at*#*at***** t*atattt#at*a*********at** $164.41 18 w 20 15 " .0 R AMER-FOREIGN LANG NEWS. ASSOC 01214 001-400-1203-4201 00699 $104.26 27160 EMPLOYEE AD/BLDG INSP. 27160 08/31/90 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 10973 $104.28 34658 09/19/90 `' 22 23 24 0 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******;ttta ***nit***************at** tit***+ttHtitttititjt*** **********•*******attt $104.26 zs 26 n 20 .22 23 2., R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 001-400-2101-4306 O0856 $116.70 5195 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 5195 OB/31/9O POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 00085 $0.00 34659 09/19/90 29 30 3, 32 :5 25 *** VENDOR TOTALannnaannnnnanaaannaanana******aaannanaaann******nananaanaaaa******nn :$116.70 33 34 35 35 .. `' 39 APOLLO LEASING COMPANY LTD 02558 001-400-3104-6900 00051 $841.29 LEASE PMT/OCT 90 09/15/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS 00066 $0.00 34660 09/19/90 3! 30 30 40 1 31 *** VENDOR TOTAL **** *******grit******** ********** to ******************************* * $841.29 4 12 11 14 J5 35 R ASPA INSURANCE PLANS 02218 001-400-1212-4188 01861 $115.00 075050500464 CITY MGR INS/SEP-DEC 90 00464 09/17/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00061 .$0.00 34661 09/19/90 46, 41 :a J1 15 *** VENDOR TOTALaaaaaaaa-ttaaaaaaaa:taaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasraaara•ttaaaaaairaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa $115.00 .. 40 4i 4z P. BANC ONE LEASING 99 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00068 $417.96 LEASE PMT/OCT 1990 09/15/90 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS 00030 $0.00 34662 09/19/90 ,. r^ *** VENDOR TOTAL sura****a<rataa?rasraaa!raaa�taaaaaaaaaaaaaaa#aaaaaaa±ra�ta�raaaaa?ra�raaa+taaaaa $417. 96 '' 0 59 60 45 °' 40 R BANK OF AMERICA 00180 001-400-1203-4201 00700 $80.13 MONTHLY EXP/BI_ACKWOOD62 08/31/90 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 10978 $0.00 34663 09/19/90 L, G3 64 45 51 *** VENDOR TOTAL*aaaaa•*****aaaaar******aaaa+taaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa******aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa $80.13 45 67 z 53 ° R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-1202-4305 00337 $3.54 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00088 $0.00 34664 09/19/90 6c 7o �, W 72 !4 15 FINANCE—SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH J ..J _ ,n,vu �_IQI O n TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/20/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND k ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/PEF _'0111_ CNV..q DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ f$ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP " S 6 B , R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 .001-400-1205-4305 00088 $11.04 00088 34664 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 CABLE TV /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.0n ^9!19!9^ 9 � • i•z _ ,z R DEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-2101-4305 01352 $38.69 00088 34664 3 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/19/90 ,s ; ,5 R DEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-2201-4305 00389 $13.43 00088 34664 ‘7 '� MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ,0 1e•i $0. 00 09/19/90 m zo " R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-4101-4305 00462 $8.34 00088 34664 21 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES zz " l'i 90. 00 09!19/90 z, „ 4 R DEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-4202-4305 00515 $21.62 00088 34664 �' i' MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 2G i08/31/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SVPPLIES $0.00 09/19/90 27 11 20 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 001-400-4601-4305 00867 $13.37 00088 34664 ZO I" MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 30 j 08/31/90 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/19/90 a, 32 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY 02509 .105-400-2601-4309 00646 $35.67 00088 34664 33�" MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS$0.00 09/19/90 3, i;, i `'s1 i *** VENDOR TOTAL atat#•m+tit?Firitirat�tst�t*ititir***irit�tat;t�tititir•�ritit�t•*ir+tat+riritarsrir*#•�tir#ir�tirtritir+r+rir*irnir*tt**#+t$145.70�6 38 11 39 i' R WILLIAM*BELTON 03638 001-210-0000-2110. 03901 $50.00 5000 00568 34665 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 5000 : 09/13/90 :;:'• /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE .$0.00 09/19/90 ., , I:" atatat VENDOR TOTAL #atatatatat***>taut**.atatitttatitatatititatttatat*atatittratatat*atffaratatat*atitat*rtat#at*atatatat*aratatat#ar*atat $50.00 M ., :" R DERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. 02664 001-400-2201-4305 00391 $64.05 518 11229 34666 i" HAZARD FORMS/FIRE DEPT 518 08/29/90 FIRE !OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 50 $64. OS 09/19/90 s, sz R DERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. 02664 001-400-4201-4305 00598 $132.37 532 00620 34666 S' I'" BUILDING PERMIT FORMS 532 09/05/90 DUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES s" $132. 37 09/19/90 ss "' R BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. 02664 110-400-3302-4305 00714 sb •• $37. 36 579 00257 34666 s' BUSINESS CARDS/C. WILSON 579 09/12/90'" PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES `so $37. 30 09/19/90 s9 at*at VENDOR TOTAL atat*ata<at*atatatatatatat*atatatatatatatatatatatatatatatata atatatatatatatataHtatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatatat ttatat*at$233.7860 u w "' R RAYatBIRGE & ASSOCIATES .. c..03607 001-400-2101-4312 01482 $1,158.00 00840 34667 " TUITION/3 OFFICERS 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST 69 `` '' $O. 00 09/19/90 c> 13 09 n 'G J 74 s J ..J it 4 FINANCE—SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DFMAND l IST _EAGF n0n7 1 J 1 y J 1 1 4 TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND. ACDSJ.UNJ NUMBF TPN 34 AMOUNT 1NVLPEF DATE 09/20/90 PO # rHu ft AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP •*** 2 3 6 > ' DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VENDOR TOTAL***********************************tiff************** '***,*.******'***** 31, 158. 00 12 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 001-400-1212-4188 01853 3102.27 00055 34668 13 14 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS '30.00 09/19/90 15 12 16 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 109-400-3301-4188 00027 32.77 00055 34666 a> 10 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 20.00 09/19/90 ,a i6 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 0130B 145-400-3401-4188 00972 30.69 00055 34668 22 17 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30.00 09/19/90 23 ,a 24 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01306 145-400-3402_-4188 00976 $0.28 00055 34668 25 z6 2' CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30.00 09/19/90 2> 2a '2 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 01308 155-400-2102-4188 00551 30.69 00055 34668 25 �7 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30.00 09/19/90 30 3. 24 32 *** VENDOR TOTAL ir********************************ir*it'***************************ir'**** 2106.70 33 34 35 36 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 001-400-1212-4188 01854 312,395.34 00056 34669 3> 33: CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30.00 09/19/90 30 40 31 BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 .-'..110-400-3302-4188 01227 31,153.18 00056 34669 i 42 1? CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30.00 09/19/90 43 33 44 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 145-400-3403-4188 00308 313.35 00056 34669 6 35 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30.00 09/19/90 4> 4a 37 BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 170-400-2103-4188 00018 3224.39 00056 34669 49 a CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30.00 09/19/90 51 3,I 52 4' BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED 01293 705-400-1217-4188 00327 $120.26 00056 34669 53 41 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 sa 55 42 55 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************itis 313,906.52 '> M 5a 6.3 45 W 45 THOMAS*BOHLIN 00894 001-400-2101-4312 01483 344.20 61 47 4a MILES/SKILLS CLASS 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST 00850 $0.00 34670 09/19/90 62 63 w 4' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 344.20 6' 50 66 5 1 6> CA 53 54 R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 00163 001-400-2101-4306 00855 $189.60 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 00089 $0.00 34671 09/19/90 ;p 71 >2 55 r3 56 74 lCc , >5 7f 1 J 1 y J 1 1 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 0008 2 ,0 2 14 16 77 :6 '9 20 2, 22 23 24 2s 25 27 20 29 30 37 32 J3 14 35 3] 36 39 40 42 43 44 45 c6 4) 48 0 5, 52 54 55 56 s0 59 2, 0 0 2 5 3 .4 J TIME PAY 12:20:18 VENDOR NAME VND # FOR 09/25/90 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUN,T 1.N LLREF DATE 09/20/90 PO If CHK-#L AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PRO -J # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL *****************stet*************************tris********************** $189.60 R BROWNING °< FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 001-400-1208-4201 00685 $578.37 00005 34672 TRASH PICKUP/SEP 90 09/01/90 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/19/90 1 R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00155 109-400-3301-4201 00005 $516.63 00005 34672 TRASH PICKUP/SEP 90 09/01/90 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/19/90 #** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************* ******.a******** ** $1,095.00 r j R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1101-4305 00329 $12.49 00570 34674 REIMD PETTY CASH/SEP 90 09/17/90 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/19/90 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1201-4305 00170 $9.58 00570 34674 REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 09/17/90 CITY MANAGER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/19/90 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1202-4305 00336 $3.25 00570 34674 REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 09/17/90 FINANCE_ ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 90.00 09/19/90 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1207-4316 00051 $6.00 00570 34674 REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 09/17/90 BUS LICENSE /TRAINING $0.00 09/19/90 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016- 001-400-2101-4305 01349 $66.13 00570 34674 REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 ' 09/17/90•. POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/19/90 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2101-4306 00853 $7.10 00570 34674 REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 09/17/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 .001-400-2101-4311 00969 $25.00 00570 34674 REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 .'09/17/90 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 R GARY#BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2101-4316 00587 $13.00 00570 34674 REIMD PETTY CASH/SEP 90 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 09/19/90 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER. . .02016 001-400-2201-4305 00388. $8.13 00570 34674 REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 t . 09/17/90,. FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/19/90 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2201-4309 00955 $53.10 00570 34674 REIMD PETTY CASH/SEP 90 09/17/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/19/90 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER, ' 02016 . 001-400-2201-4316 00251 $8.00 00570 34674 REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 09/17/90 FIRE /TRAINING 30.00 09/19/90 2 ,0 2 14 16 77 :6 '9 20 2, 22 23 24 2s 25 27 20 29 30 37 32 J3 14 35 3] 36 39 40 42 43 44 45 c6 4) 48 0 5, 52 54 55 56 s0 59 2, 0 0 2 5 3 .4 J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH P J TIME PAY 12:20:182 VFNnne_clAMF VNR # DATE INVC FOR 09/25/90 ACCC111111_11UMDFAMOUNT TNSLPEF PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE PO •t# AMOUNT UNENC 09/20/90 CHK # 4 5 DESCRIPTION DATE EXP 6 1 s e R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 02016 , 09/17/90 001-400-2401-4311 00197 ANIMAL CONTROL $2.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00570 $0.00 34674 09/19/90 s ,2 2 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 02016 09/17/90 001-400-4101-4305 00461 PLANNING $5.26 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00570 ' $0.00 34674 09/19/90 s 5 " R GARY*SRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMQ PETTY CASH/SEP 90 02016 ' 09/17/90 001-400-4204-4309 01743 BLDG MAINT $3.20 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00570 $0.00 34674 09/19/90 1e 20 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 02016 09/17/90 001-400-4601-4305 00866 COMM RESOURCES $13.88 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00570 $0.00 34674' 09/19/90 2, z2 23 24 ° 2° z, R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP .90 02016 09/17/90 001-400-6101-4316 00035 • PARKS - $6.00 /TRAINING 00570 $0.00 34674 09/19/90 26 25 27 2s 2.1 R GARY*BRUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMQ PETTY CASH/SEP 90 02016 09/17/90 110-400-3302-4305 00712 PARKING ENF $0.20 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00570 $0.00 34674 09/19/90 29 3, 32 ` .. 27 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMB PETTY CASH/SEP 90 02016 09/17/90 160-400-3102-4309 00523 SEWER/ST DRAIN $612 . /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00570 $0.00 34674 09/19/90 33 34 3s 9 23 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************trir********ir****irteatir*titrtftrir*tr*****tt+tir*trir}r*tra*aa*******tr *248.44 35 3' 3° 39 22 33 R BUCK'S BODY & FENDER REPAIR CITY MANAGER CAR 5158 00420 09/12/90 705-400-1210-4324 00027 AUTO/PROP/BONDS $623.22 /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS.. 5158 10972 $694.89 34675 09/19/90 4° 91 42 43 34 35 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************-p****************at*****p**** $623.22 4.1 e 4, ° 3° R CHARLES*BUCKIER CITE PMT REFUND 41635 03627 09/17/90 110-300-0000-3302 36096 $18.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING 941635 00101 $0.00 34676 09/19/90 4° 5' , `O 41 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $18.00 52 53 54 55 3 7.5 BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 67602 00034 09/10/90 001-400-2101-4305 01353 POLICE $202.64 167884/167602 00356 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $202.64 34677 09/19/90 x 5' 54 'A 6, 52 63 4' 4s , R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY OFFICE FURNITURE/POLICE 67602 00034 09/10/90 001-400-2101-5401 00038 POLICE $2,195.54 167884/167602 00356 /EQUIP—LESS THAN $500 $2,178.54 34677 09/19/90 5, '2 *** VENDOR TOTAL .*************************************tt *tt**************************** $2,398.18 64 66 5, ''3 R CANADA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 00046 09/15/90 001-400-1212-4188 01858 EMP BENEFITS $677.25 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00008 $0.00 34678 09/19/90 GO `'' ° ,,. ,z ,4 ,5 rr J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VENDDP. NAME VND # Ac c AUNT NUM➢FR TB.N AMOI)NT 11 V /RFF AMOUNT -PAGE -0010 DATE 09/20/90 PO 4 2 < ,, DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION UNENC _CHK_U DATE EXP e 5 R CANADA LIFE 00046 170-400-2103-4188 00020 $77.40 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00008 50.00 34678 09/19/90i6 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $754.65 'q 5 ,6 R CANADA LIFE 00239 001-400-1212-4188 01851 $3,152.69 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 $0.00 34679 09/19/90 17 .9 20 18 R CANADA LIFE. 00239 105-400-2601-4188 01009 $93.032' CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 $0.00 34679 09/19/90 zz 23 25 25 21 R CANADA LIFE 00239 109-400-3301-4188 00026 $17.28 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0002 $0.00 34679 09/19/90 26 22 3 :c R CANADA LIFE 00239 110-400-3302-4188 01225 $591.78 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 $0.00 34679 09/19/90 25 29 30 3. 32 , 53 2> R CANADA LIFE 00239 145-400-3401-4188 00970 518.59 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 $0.00 34679 09/19/90 33 355 25 2' 36 R CANADA LIFE 00239 145-400-3402-4188 00974 36.73 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 $0.00 34679 09/19/90 35 31 30 39 31 32 33 R CANADA LIFE 00239 . 155-400-2102-4188 00550 $13.42 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 '.CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 $0.00 34679 09/19/90 .10 ..3 5 35 R CANADA LIFE 00239 160-400-3102-4188 00951 $104.27 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 $0.00 3467945 09/19/90 .45 �, , 37 31 n R CANADA LIFE 00239 705-400-1209-4188 00320 $19.77 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 . .LIADILITY INS /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS 00022 $0.00 34679 09/19/90 >, 52 ' 41 42 R CANADA LIFE 00239 705-400-1217-4188 00325 $26.475.1 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0002234679 $0.00 09/19/90 55 ^' 45 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****tr************* r*********sty******************�r******** *arts* tit**** $4,044.03 56 5' 59 4, `� 40 8 CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 001-400-2101-4305 01351 $44.47 MISC. CHARGES/SEP 90 /2942 .09/15/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 2717/2942 00911 $O. 00 346c'`i0 09/19/90 60 6. 62 53 50 51 52 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT . 00389 110-400-3302-4305 00713 $26.59 MISC. CHARGES/SEP 90 /2942 09/15/90 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 2717/2942 00911 $0.00 34680 09/19/90 54 65 66 so 53 .n '5 6� 65 C 7. 50 2.91 72 ]A . 75 a 1 1 I /7 3 4 1 0 12 '3 2 2 2 3 32 3 3 35 35 3 38 39 40 42 13 44 45 15 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 56 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 'In 1 1 FTNAWF-SPA-44n TIME 12:20:18 1 ii- mcdmi) , 1,, FOR 09/25/90 1 vND_A_____ACCDUNT_NUMBER___SRN_It AMOUNT______ZNV4REF DATE PO # UNENC 09/20/90 CHK-# PAYVENIICIEL11.811F DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************ ******************* ..%:1 $71..06 • R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC. CHARGES/SEP 90 22368 00014 001-400-3101-4311 00016 09/15/90 MEDIANS $72.86 122932/122368 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00912 • 30.00 34681 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $72.86 R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/AUG 90 99634 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00149 08/31/90 PUB WKS ADMIN $620.70 99634 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00002 $0.00 34682. 09/19/90 R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/AUG 90 99634 00153 - '110-400-3302-4187 00247 08/31/90 - PARKING ENF $52.50 99634 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00002 $0.00 34682 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $673. 20 R COAST GLASS COMPANY ' MISC. CHARGES/SEP 90 7679 00325 . 001-400-4204-4309 01748 09/15/90 .: '; : BLDG MAINT $21.35 7679 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00915 $0.00 34683 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $21. 35 R COAST IRRIGATION CO. .:. - SPR1NKLERS/PARKS 1770 00354 ,:001400-6101-4309' 00944 09/04/90- .-- . '-r PARKS $122.70 1770 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 01006 3122.78 34684 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** S122.78 R COAST TURF & UTILITY SUPPLY SPRINKLER PARTS 33580 02289 - 001-400-6101-4309 00945 08/30/90 .PARKS $203.57 933580 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00461 3203.58 34685 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 3203.57 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017 . 001-400-1101-4304 00323 08/31/90 .' . . CITY COUNCIL $6.89 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 '30.00 34686 09/19/90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 .08/31/90 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00329 CITY CLERK $1.02 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $0.00 34686 09/19/90 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017. . 001-400-1131-4304 00249 08/31/90 CITY ATTORNEY $10.21 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $0.00 34686 09/19/90 . . . J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TIME PAY 12:20:18 VENDOR NAME VNP # DATE INVC FOR09/25/90 ACCfll1NT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT LN.VI.REF PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE 09/20/90 PJa_if CHK 4 UNENC DATE EXP z 3 6 B ` 5 G7 DESCRIPTION v 9 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017 08/31/90 001-400-1141-4304 00351 CITY TREASURER $12.55 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00017 >O. 00 34686 i 091 19. 90 ] 10 n 12 2 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017 08/31/90 001-400-1201-4304 00371 CITY MANAGER $1.7400311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $0.00 4 34686 09/19/90 6 `3 '` is R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017 08/31/90 001-400-1202-4304 00381 FINANCE ADMIN $19.31 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $O. OO 34686 09/1 .. 9/- TO i7 16 19 20 'G 18 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017 03/31/90 001-400-1203-4304 00385 PERSONNEL $17.92 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $0.00 34686 09/19/90 zz 23 24 L0 2: R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 . 11737 00017 08/3>1/90 ' 001-400-2101-4304 00659 POLICE $276.63 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $0.00 34686 09/19/90 25 27 2` 23 2. R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017 08/31/90 001-400-4101-4304 00384 PLANNING $26.31 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $O. 00 34686 09/19/90 28 329 0 J0 31 s 2, R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017 08/31/90 001-400-4202-4304 00389 PUB WKS ADMIN $55.68 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $0.00 34686 09/19/90 32 33 35 35 6 '' 39 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017 08/31/90 001-400-4601-4304 00449 COMM RESOURCES $26.66 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $0.00 34686 09/19/90 36 ], 39 39 31 32 n R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017 08/31/90 .` 001-400-6101-4304 00266 PARKS $11.35 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $0.00 34686 09/19/90 40 41 z <] 4 15 3 P. COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90 11737 00017 08/31/90 105-400-2601-4304 00154 STREET LIGHTING $13.92 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $0.00 34686 09/19/90 4.3 45 46 47 D 3' R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/AUG 90' 11737 . 00017 .110-400-3302-4304 08/31/90 00382 PARKING ENF $43.49 00311737 /TELEPHONE 00817 $0. 00 34686 09/19/90 .,n 49 L0 5, 52 40 n1 n z 43 *** VENDOR TOTAL irtrir#*trtrirtrtr*#.y .a#***sr***at********tt•#tt•n#tttr*****##*irtr**irtt*tr** ****** .### $523. 68 s� 55 nn 45 46 4, 40 49R R DAWN*COOK 03489 001-400-2101-4312 01480 $156.00 MILES/DISPATCH COURSE 09/17/90, POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 00845 $0.00 34667 09/19/90 56 5, 5,3 59 G1 G2 63 trtrtr VENDOR TOTAL ir****tr*****tr******tris#tririrtrtrirtttF*#trititte#it*t4ttatitatitittruit#itttirtt*****ttirttttitta#tttttr $156. 00 �' s, 52 THE*DAILY BREEZE EMPLOYEE ADS/AUG 90 5-100 00642 08/31/90 001-400-1203-4201 00696 PERSONNEL $59.36 392205-100 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00819 $0.00 3468865 09/19/90 64 G6 67 53 54 55 G8 G9 70 71 SG t7 75 72 4 ° � CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ` ''»'' TIME 12:20:16 � ��' � ^� �`' ��',' FOR 09/25/90 / ` .� � ` � PAY vrmoOa-uu�m' ." . ` " . • RN # ^mmwr zmuLRsF � DATE PO # UNENC , 09/20/90 # " " ^ ^DESCRIPTION DATE INVC pnoJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT _-c*u DATE EXP ° 6 , " °°° VENDOR TOTAL °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°*°°°°°°°°°°*°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° �59�aa `.� " - ., 'D '. 12 8 DAPPER TIRE co. 01390 110-400-3302-4311 00624 *117.77 042912 MISC.CHARGES/AUG 90 4281e 06/31/90 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00820 $0.00 34689 09/19/90 '` �� ." . ` .^ ." *** VENDOR TOTAL °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°**°°°°°°°*°°°°°°***°*°°°*°°°*°°**°°°°°°*°°°°°°°°°°°°° $117.77 ' ^ ." ." 20 ." ' '' R DEPARTMENT or ANIMAL CARE & 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00139 *z.007�or SHELTER COSTS/AUG 90 09/10/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00014 $0.00 34690 09/19/90 2 22.2 2. :0;1 =| °°° VENDOR TOTAL *°*°°°°°°*°°°°**°°°°*v°°°°°°***°°°°°*°°***°°°°°°°*°°*°**°*°°°°°°*°*° *z.00r�u7 ' 25'-1 = `` 28 = 23 24 p osrnsns 02523 001-400-6101-4309 00946 *320.25 3277 TOT SEATS/PARK SWINGS 3277 08/17/90 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00479 $320.25 34691 09/19/90 = 3, 32 2 �`^ ,'35 °°° VENDOR TOTAL °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°�°°°°°°°°°°°°°*°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° $320.25 � ° � aln DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 001-400-2101-4201 00643 paua.*o 246021991 MAINT/SEP 90 21991 09/01/90 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00006 $0.00 34692 09/19,90 3/30oompurcn � 3140 32R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 00269 •'001 -*0072201-4201~ ^00162 $537.60 246021991 COMPUTER MAINT/SEP 90 21991 09/01/90 • ', ' `. :-FIRE :„ /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00006 �o�ou 34692 op/�pr�n r -4333 44 " 35 = *** vswoon rorm- °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° ��.o���ou 45 ^ 47 � ,' JOn DUN & onAosrnssr . ' ou�on `_po1-400_12or-4o1a 00052 $165.00 SEMINAR REG/M. FEHSKENS np/�rrpo�.�``�^' '_ -BUS LICENSE /TRAINING 11033 $0.00 34693 09/19/90 4939 � 52 40 = °°° VENDOR TOTAL °°°°°°°°°°°°°°*°°°°°°*°°°°°°°*°°°*°°°°°***°*°°°*°"°°°°°*°°°°°°°°°°** $165.00 53 9. 55 - R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02840 ! 001-400_1208-4201 00684 $241.00 006m71210 ^ MAINT/AUG 90 71210' oa/�n/�o � GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT �56° 00826 $0.00 34694 09/19/90 secopzsn 5945 45� 4847 = 61 = ° � � *** VENDOR TOTAL 4°°°°°°°°*°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°'°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° $24100 ° 00 51urFIcs R sAarmAw. INC.0251* no1-4uo-�000-4ono 00008 $563 .82 SUPP/STOCK/AUG 90 0e/31/90 ` GEN APPROP /orpzcs OPER/SUPPLIES ooeeo $0.00 3*695 09/19/90 = .4 !IS72 . 685369 ° ,. � , ' . � / 73° = 75 . 7y � � _41 _1 � � � -1 � � 0 is) • FINANCE—SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND_I1ST nn 1A J J lint 1 : u:jts FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/20/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # AC_COIJNT NUMBER 'TRN 4* AMOUNT IN51/REF z i 0 PO 'i# CHK—a# DESCRIPTION DATE 1NVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 1 ' 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL n*-a**qtr*;r+s•*********ff*tr************srtr*****tr****-atrittter#-ern****ars# •armarts** $583. 82 9 10 11 " 2 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-1201-4311 00077 $3.19 0028 34696 13 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90CITY MANAGER /AUTO M14 , MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19!90 22 13 ,s s :5 `' R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-2101-4311 00971 $767.03 00828 34696 ' MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 6 17 6 19 17MISC. I'" R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-2201-4311 00360 $74.53 00828 34696 CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 20 21 22 z3 2129 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-2401-4311 00199 $8.47CR 00828 34696 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 ' 2e 26 26 z7 2a R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00601 $439.92 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 0082800 34696 08/31/90 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE =0.00 09/19/90 2 20 31 .32 27 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 - 001-400-4201-4311 00215 $69.28 00822 34696 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE `x0.00 09/19/90 34 is ' 'O 31 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4202-4311 00148 $5.23 000828 34696 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE09/19/90w $O. 00 ^.. J' 3s 32 33 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 . 001-400-4204-4309 01745 • $9.69 00828 34696 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90. BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS . $0.00 09/19/90 40 41 .42 +3 15 3c 37 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4204-4311 00155 $57.87 00828 3469645 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 BLDG MAINT /AUTO f1AINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 44 c 47 3" 10R R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00491 $219.31 00828 34696 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/19/90 so 51 ' 42 3 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-4311 00195 $306.19 00828 34696 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 s.2 ss 44 ns$O. 46R R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-400-4601-4311 00085 $52.99 00828 34696 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90' COMM RESOURCES /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00 09/19/90 56 " 58 5s -01 40 4') EDDINGS ISR OTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 105-400-2601-4309 00647 $Sq. bq MISC. CHARGES/AUC 90 08/31/90 oea2a 34696 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/19/90 6C 61 62 63 y 5. 52 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00626 7 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 AINT' A 00828 34696 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 6° 6s 66 6; 43 54 5,. 6A 6'1 70 71 — /J 74 - 1 72 �7�5/ 7 J J V n 2 2 2 ,I2 t' k .t d a a 45 40 49 50 51 52 so CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH F INANCF—SFA'440 131 J J TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VNf) # Af rruINT NUM.BFR TR11LA AMOUNT IN LREF DATE PQ# UNENC J 09/20/90 CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ar**tar**********tt***********************tr*******..*************tr****** $2,947.13 R EL CAMINO COLLEGE 01469 001-400-2101-4312 01479 $17.50 TUITION/7 OFFICERS 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 00852 $0.00 i 34697 09/19/90 arartr VENDOR TOTAL***at*****tt***tt*#*at**********tt**atattr*************iHrataHtaraattatataterarat******* $17. 50 R ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 02354 001-400-3103-6900 00061 $1,736.76 LEASE PAYMENT/OCT 90 09/15/90 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS 00043 $0.00 34698 09/19/90 D *** VENDOR TOTAL +Htatatatatatarariratir araratatataratarttitttttatatatarataratttatatat taratitataHtattrar p•atatatatatar**•ntttt*attr#Etat aatttttat $1,736.78 R EXECUTIVE—SUITE SERVICES INC. 01294 001-400-4204-4201 00392 $1,325.00 JANITOR SERV/AUG 90 08/31/90 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00039 $0.00 34699 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL a Etat*at*************it************stat*tt** ******#atattrtta ********attttttt****tt* '$1,325.00 P. FRANKSONS, INC. 00010 110-400-3302-4311 00627 $27.67 18208 CUSHMAN DUST SHIELD 18208 09/06/90 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00224 $26.39 34700 09/19/90 R FRANKSONS, INC. 00010 110-400-3302-4311. 00628. $195.44 17971/18207 CUSHMAN TAILPIPE/GASKETS 18207 09/06/90 •PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00230 $181.58 34700 09/19/90 *** VENDOR. TOTAL jttta*.artrarartro**ttatatarat car*arararartrtt*ttttattttrar•a*tttratat;tit*at**-x**jtaratatatttat+tttattt;,;tatat**$tat*at $223.11 R DR. BRADLEY*FREDERICK 03635 001-210-0000-2110.. 03898 $1,525.00 95570 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 95570 09/13/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE • 00565 $0.00 34701 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL***at*at****at************at*************#***$tat**tt***at**ttattt*ata *****at*** $1,525.00 R JOSEPH*GAINES 02720 001-400-2101-4312 01475 $245.18 MILES/FIREARMS COURSE • 09/11/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 00846 $0.00 34702 09/19/90 *** VENDOR. TOTAL**at******ttat************at**atttattt*at**tt#at***nat;rtr***atatar*ataraEartr*atatatatararat*** $245. 18 • R GATES MC DONALD 02596 . . 705-400=1217-4182 00149. $22,546.40 WORK COMP CLAIMS/AUG 90 08/31/90 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR 10982 $0.00 34703 09/19/90 J J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA34O J J , TIME 12:20:18 :. FOR 09/25/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCQI)NT NUMfFR TRN t AMOUNT INVIREE— ._C it; DATE PO ftCHK_# UNENC L- Quit, 09/20/90 DATE EXP 2 3 s 7 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************± ***************traria**** t***********n***** ********** $22,546.40 40 9 ,0 1, 12 : R GATES, MCDONALD & COMPANY 02538 705-400-1217-4201 00086 $1,333.34 02-027084 WORK COMP ADMIN/SEP 90 27084 09/04/90 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00044 ' $0.00 34704 09/19/90 ,s 15 15 *** VENDOR TOTAL ;rata*atititittt+ttrttittt*trttat•u*it*itltitatittt#ttitttttit*tt**atit*trttit*irttitit*ittttt*****trtiit** *** $1,333.34 'r ,B 20 t6 17 16 R GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 00058 001-400-4204-4309 01747 $61.87 845-305221 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 05221 08/31/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00830 $0.00 34705' i 9 09. 19/ O 2 23 19 PO : 21 *** VENDOR TOTAL jt+rir*tttttttrit+*tratF*tririt***nttitittrtt*it*tt**tt** nirtttt****atttir*it*irtrit*****ir****trim•*it $61. 87 24 25 26 z7 22 23 21 R GEORGE & AL'S AUTO TOP SHOP 01748 001-400-2201-4309 00958 $120.00 2123 RECOVER SEATS/FIRE ENG. 2123 09/04/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 11230 $120.00 34706 09/19/90 26 20 330 =, `7 *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************tr**ar*****ar******************* **** $120.00 32 3J 34 35 23 30 R GERBER AMBULANCE SERVICE 02897 001-400-2101-4201 00645 $275.50 108575 EMERG. PRISONER SERVICES 08575 08/25/90 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00929 $0.00 34707 09/19/90 35 J7 37 31 ,. *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************ittt**************************a********** $275.50 40 4, P2 43 74 3'' 35 R GRISWOLD'S 03601 001-400-2101-4312 01478 $173.25 HOTEL/W. KELLY 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE POST 00844 $0.00 34708 09/19/90 45 7 4G 47 37 3a 1 3 4,1 41 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $173.25 - . v so 51 R GRISWOLD'S 03602 001-400-2101-4312 01477 $173.25 HOTEL/J. KEARIN 09/11/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST,.:., 00842 $0.00 34709 09/19/90 52 63 91 45 4' 47 '" _, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************.************** $173.25 56 57 50 59 R GRISWOLD'S 03603 001-400-2101-4312 01476 $173.25 HOTEL/K. MITCHELL .09/10/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 00839 $0. 00 34710 09. 19/90 60 6' 62 63 !,0 51 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $173.25 55 66 67 53 `i4 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00273 $107.08 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/01/90 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00931 $0.00 34711 09/19/90 6B 43 7O 7, .,� 75 72 3 74 J J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH /' TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/20/90 PAY VFNDDR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUM73FR TRM ## AMGUNT TNYLREJ- P.O # CHK. # a 4 e 7 e 5 6 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 9 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00658 $81.27 00911 34711 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/01/90 . - 'POLICE :. /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/19/90 ,90 0 II 12 10 2 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00381 $43.46 00911 34711 TELE CHARGES/SEP 90 09/01/90 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/19/90 • 13 14 15 16 3 1 4 15 *tete VENDOR TOTAL **te***********•u***stir***#*************** ********* rittt*•a•*#************ $231. 6117 16 19 20 6 17 19 R GTEL 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00448 $109. 59 2436162 00934 34712 EQUIP RENT/SEP 90 36162 09/04/90 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/19/90 21 22 23 24 10 20 23 *tete VENDOR TOTAL*****************************************************************#*.n $109.59 .. 25 26 27 28 22 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 001-400-1212-4188 01852 $2,377.33 00001 34713 •23 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 07/19/90 24 29 30 31 32 25 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 105-400-2601-4188 01010 $4.20 00001 34713 '25 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 .09/15/90 . . STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 27 . J3 34 35 36 •e R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 110-400--3302-4188 01226 $82.74 00001 34713 2'g CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 30 37 3313 9 40 31 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 ,." =145-400-3401-4188 00971: $2.87 00001 34713 32 ...� - CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 33 41 az 43 .15 46 43 i'1 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 145-400-3402-4188 00975 $1.15 00001 34713 3'' CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 36 37 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 145-400-3403-4188 00307 $1.26 00001 34713 J0 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 39 $0. 00 09/19/90 4' 50` 51 52 40 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 160-400-3102-4188 00952 $20.63 00001 34713 41 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 •12 53 55 56 a3 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 026.3 170-400-2103-4188 00017 $21.00 00001 34713 94 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 57 556 71 ,o G1 62 63) .1'' R GUARDIAN'DENTAL 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00321 $21.21 00001 347i3 .17 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 .09/15/90 LIADILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS n $0.00 09/1S/90 49 R GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00326 $36.11 00001 34713 fO CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 . 09/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 51 64 65 6] `/ 52 54 55 C.11 i0 i1 -. ... f 72 75 iy J J J .,y V • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 OC11 FR , TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND #.' ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DATE PO_# AMOUNT UNENC 09/20/90 CHK # DATE EXP 3 5 6 ] 0 '' 5 6 DESCRIPTION' DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ' *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************************n** ******* $2,568.50 9 ,r, 9 12 '0 R GUILD PRINTING COMPANY, INC. 00202 001-400-1203-4305 00280 $204.96 126609-01 10963 34714 3 12 PRINTING/JOB BULLETINS 09-01 08/31/90 PERSONNEL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $197.49 09/19/90 16 '3' *** VENDOR TOTAL*tftt**ititit*tFititttttitt►tr*it*ittFtt**irtt*tt*ittt*tFtrttitititir#**tr♦ttFititatitit#n*attr-tttF+r*juttttF*;t*# $204. 96 '] I6 IS .. . 19 20 " R C. *GUTIERRES/MIGUEL SERRANO 03626 110-300-0000-3302 36097 $20.00 CITE PAYMENT REFUND 25917 09/06/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING 925917 00178 $0.00 34715 09/19/90 zz 23 24 19 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************tt******tt*************************iter******************** $20. 00 z5 : 0 26 27 20 P. HALPRIN SUPPLY COMPANY 00946 001-400-2201-4187 00254 $89.67 43521 11232 34716 29 23 24 DOOTS/CARROLL/OSEKOWSKY 43521 08/28/90 FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $89.67 09/19/90 30 3, 3? .' *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************tt***•**ttititttit*tt*it;ttt*atitatttit*ttitittetttitittttt*it*** $89. 67 33 `5 l4 27 35 36 26 R ALLAN*HANCOCK COLLEGE 03625 001-400-2101-4312 01481 $35.00 37 0 30 TUITION/D. LOUGHIN 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 00837 $0.00 34717 09/19/90 30 39 31 itiFet VENDOR TOTAL etetetetetet#iF#et###etit#**�t*itit**itatit*tt*it#*ttatttittt**it*+t#tttt**tt*ittt**tt**tt**tt*******.. " ..40 $35.00 42 31 43 3'1 R HASCO OIL COMPANY 03592 001-400-4205-4310 00166 $542.62 44 45 15 ENGINE OIL/CITY YARD 93771 08/30/9046 93771 00493 34718 35 EQUIP SERVICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $475.08 09!19/90 47 3' *** VENDOR TOTAL #iFiFetet##x-stat*it*at#ititatttatitit##itattt*ttit#itatatit�titat#u�tatttit�titittt*tttt�-*at*t�•*tt***tt*a•ttit# $54� 2. b?_ 49 3,3 50 39, 40 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-1207-4311 00040 $4.00 2023 00836 SG S3 41 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 2023 08/31/90DVS LICENSE 34719 54 42 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 ss 43 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065-H 001-400-2101-4311 00970 $204.00 2023 56 5, 4`1 A5 - MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 2023 08/31/90 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00836 $0. 00 34719 09/ 19/90 n 50 4, R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-2401-4311 00198 $12.00 2023 GO 61 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 2023 08/31/90 ANIMAL CONTROL 00836 34719 40 49 /AUTO MAINTENANCE62 $0. 00 09/19/90 63 5O R HERMOSA CAR WASH -.00065 001-400-4201-4311 00214 $8.00 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 2023 08/31/90 BUILDING 2023 00836 34719 64 45 51 /AUTO MAINTENANCEb6 $0. 00 09/19/90 67 52 53 60 69 54 70 55 ]1 56 . ]2 !3 ]4 `' - 75 ZY J 1 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SF zTIME 3 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/20/90 PAY VENDOR NAME V1ND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNTPLL# CHK a 4 6 7 8 a 5 6 —IlY_VLREE DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP , 8 9 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 ' 001-400-4202-4311 00147 $4.00 2023 00636 34719 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 2023 08/31/90 —PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 o , 0 i2 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 110-400-3302-4311 00625 $4.00 2023 00836 34719 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 2023 08/31/90 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/19/90 4 ,s ,5 3 0 ,.. *** VENDOR TOTAL***46******************•********************46************************* $236.00 - e ,9 20 0 8 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-202-0000-2020 01111 $791.85 48579/48480 11112 34720 CLARK FIELD LAMPS 48480 08/27/90 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $0.00 09/19/90 21 22 23 24 2, *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************41********************** $791.8525 26 27 26 22 23 2., R INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL 02551 001-400-1203-4315 00052 $70.00 7290 10977 34721 ANNUAL DUES/BLACKWOOD 7290 09/11/90 PERSONNEL /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 09/19/90 29 30 3, 32 2.6 27 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $70. 00 _ n 35 35 23 936 30 R OFCR LANCE*JAAKOLA 02137 001-400-2101-4312 01468 $67.86 00847 34722 MILES/INTERRGTN COURSE 09/11/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 09/20/90 37 39 40 J1 32 33 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************tt** 4r4t4rtr4r4rtr4r4t4r4r4tte4rtt4str4rtt4ttrtt*at4ttt;t4ttt4r4tar4t4e4r* 4t4t4rtr4rn•4f4e4E4r4t*** $67.86 .. .. a, 2 43 `5 35 46 47 48 3'7 35 R JOBS AVAILABLE 01165 001-400-1203-4201 00698 $64.40 90-18-049 10976 34723 EMPLOYEE AD/BLDG INSP. 8-049 06/26/90 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/19/90 J7 39 *** VENDOR TOTAL 4t4r4t*4t4e4r4r4r4r4a4r4E4t4r4r4t4e4r4r4f4t4t4r4F4F4f4F4E4t4etr4r4e4ta4t4t4t4r4a4r****4r4ttrte4e*4t4F4F4t4e*4rtr4r4t*4r4ttt4ttr $64. 40 .' 50 51 52 52 60 41 R JUCKES—HUBBARD 02562 001-210-0000-2110 03896 $375.00 95606 00566 34724 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 95606 09/13/90z 09/13/90/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 09/19/90 i3 5554 56 43 44 .5 *** VENDOR TOTAL 4+4ttr4r4k###4s#4r4E#4eit4r#*##*##*###4r4f4F4fta4r4a4t##4e##*#####*##4ttt4r4r4F##4t4e4t4c4f#4t4t#*4F# - . $375.00 '7 _ .. 59 4C 47 49 60 R JOHN*KEARIN 01032 001-400-2101-4312 01469 $77.25 00841 34725 MEALS/POST. COURSE .09/17/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.006z 09/19/90 63 4' 50 5, 64 **4t VENDOR TOTAL 4±**4r4! 4t4t4t4�4t4s#4r4t4att4o-n*4rn4rito4rtt4x#tt4ty **4� **o 4trvtt4ttt4t4ttt4a4tttit*ittt4t4r4r4r4!4t*4t4t4t4+.*4t4rt�tr$77.256s 66 67 52 53 5. 66 R WILLIAM#KELLY 00362 001-400-2101-4312 01470 $77.25 00843 34726 6i MEALS/P. O. S. T. COURSE 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST0 $0. 00 09/19/90 71 Si 56 72 73 74 IV J J —1 J J FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH D.EI ND._L IST 0 3 lilt ice: 20: 1k3 FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/20/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VNP # A UUN NUMBER TRN__1 AMOUNT INVIREF PO # CHK_ # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 6 7 1 • **if VENDOR TOTAL ****************************** -r *************•a**** rjt#�!•+r* ********* ** $77. 25 e .0 ,. R KIWANIS CLUB OF HERMOSA BEACH 00380 001-400-4101-4315 00133 340. 00 10862 34727 SEPTEMBER DUES/SCHUDACH 09/05/90 PLANI'JING /MEMBERSHIP '50.00 09/19/90 12 .3 .5 i3 *** VENDOR TOTAL ? **#**tr#tt**#?t#*•sf• *ar***•rt**to** •## •*sr*#*tr**#***itxitarat#its•*#iru*itit***tf*tt*** $40. 00 .3 .9 ,ni R GARY*KNIGHT 036:36 001-210-0000-2110 0:3099 $1,575.00 95593 00567 34728' WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 95593 09/13/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 09/19/90 2, 2, 222 3 *** VENDOR TOTAL *****#ar•u•****irtti ****#*#* •********************•r ******** ra-************* $1,575.00 i' 24 n 2,5 2, R L.A. TRONICS 02088 001-400-2101-5401 00037 $117.32 00934 34729 CALCULATOR/POLICE 09/17/90 POLICE /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 $0.00 09/19/90 2,, , 3. ., '" *** VENDOR TOTAL#**ittt•ttattt*it+Htititatn*tEittt*iritttir*attririaitirirtrir*•Etta ..o-##*.tr#.aittr*ar*•rFir#*ttirr,.#a#tririr*irsttr $117. 32 J2 34 35 11 R COMMANDER MICHAEL*LAVIN 00792 001-400-2101-4316 00588 $685.00 00931 34730 PARTIAL EXP/FBI ACADEMY 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAINING 30. 00 09/19/90 3c 31 3!, 3. 32 H ' *** VENDOR TOTAL *stat******••Ott**•****ta*************** ****a#• #it********** *** *** *****# $685. 00 I2 43 35 R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-1207-4305 00209 $13.61 00837 34731 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 BUS LICENSE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/19/90 44 47 3" " 0 R .LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-2101-4309 00338 $22.71 00837 34731 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90. so POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/19/90 s. 42 R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-2201-4309 00956 $10.80 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 00837 34731 08/31/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/19/905. 55 a R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 :' 001-400-2401-4309 00156 ,� MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 NCE 00837 34731 " 08/31/90:. ANIMAL CONTROL /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0. 00 09/19/90 5, "' 4n 49 co P. LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-3101-5401 00003 $162.26 859178 01014 34731 6' HEAVY DUTY SAl•1ZALL 59178 09/06/90 MEDIANS/EQUIPMENT-LESS THAN $500 2 rz $162. 6 09/19/90 63 sO R LEARNED LUMBER c. 00167 • 001-400-4204-4309 01744 $148.16 00837 34731 `s MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 G5 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/19/90 67 53 •:4 ,,, r+. `9 70 1. 72 ,J ILV J J CITY OF HEP.MOSA BEACH rc— 9 ° I 9 ° { TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VFNnnR NAME VW]ft ArrnIINT NWMDFr TRN # AMOUNT INWREF------ DATE 09/20/90 CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT --P0—# UNENC DATE EXP R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-4205-4309 00490 $22.24 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00837 $0.00 34731 09/19/90 R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-6101-4309 00942 $56.95 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00837 $0.00 I 34731 09/19/90 R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 • 160-400-3102-4309 00524 $53.70 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 • SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00837 $0.00 34731 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $493.63 R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 01320 001-400-2101-4187 00389 $525.04 57249 MOTORS UNIFORM/D. RICKEY 57249 09/12/90 . POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10793 $802.54 34732 09/19/90 • 4. -**-n* VENDOR TOTAL ******qtr***************************************at******#************u $525.04 R COUNTY OF *LOS ANGELES 00287 001-400-4101-4201 00071 $48.60 4860 MAP REVISIONS/SEP 90 4860 09/05/90 .• PLANNING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00059 $0.00 34733 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL+rnirtrsr+r*a#ar*ir*tr*tr#ir#*trirairair**ir***ttu•*ir*irirtrara#it*irittrir**iririrair#ir*ir*irirtrtr irtr $48.60 R LOS ANGELES TIMES 00213 1.001-400-1203-4201 00697 $510.70 35-011427 EMPLOYEE ADS/AUG 90 11427 09/02/90 ' . PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00840 $0.00 34734 09/19/90 **o VENDOR TOTAL*ir*itnirat*ir****tt;rirtrtt•tt#+t*a•ar***traitirtrittrtrirtr***irtrirtr*tt*trit**trtrir##a***irirartr*trirtt $510.70 R DIANNE*LOUGHIN 03628 001-400-2101-4312 01471 $136.75 MEALS/RECORDS COURSE 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 00835 $0.00 34735 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL *tr*;rititsrtt***it*tt*itnit3+*at3t*trjtat-tt+tia*itttattrrvit*ttatirjtittf****it+r-tt;ait•nar*ir**atit+tttit+rtt+rittt $136.75 R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. 00079 001-400-2101-4187 00387 $112.99 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00841 30.00 34736 09/19/90 R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. 00079 001-400-2101-4187 00388 $417.34 403282 MOTORS BOOTS/RICKEY 03282 .08/28/90 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10798 $480.37 34736 09/19/90 R LOUIS THE TAILOR, INC. 00079 :001-400-2201-4187 00253 $160.13 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 00841 $0.00 34736 09/19/90 2 2 2 2 3 ▪ 3 • 3 3V y 3' 3 41 42 43 44 • 47 40 49 S0 5, 52 r, 53' 54 55 50 J J 2 3 4 6 J e 9 10 tl J 2 13 r4 '5 J 16 ,9I 20 a, 22 23 J 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 3{ 32 33 34 35 r 30 D 3, a0 39 47 u ,3 J 1-1 :6 7 'J S▪ IJ 3 4 J :6 a 9 52 53 71d 0 2 .40 IP CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA34O J J J TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/20/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT I'B,IMBFR TRN # AMOUNT IKVLREF _'O It CHK_# z 3 ° DESCRIPTION DATE 1NVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 6 ) arattt VENDOR TOTAL ***********************ars•********************************tr*******#tt# $690.46 ' 12 O R M&K METALS 00777 001-400-6101-4309 00943 344.69 70642 01004 34737 SHEET METAL/RAT CONTROL 70642 09/07/90 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS '$44.69 09/20/90 13 is .6 .6 U *** VENDOR TOTAL # +r�tiraritjr �ttt rr3t irtr�t aat�rtr#trarita+rirte�rtratst�rnirtr*astir�rsr*piruiritiritirtraririrp+ruerttatririr 244.69 ., fi .9 20 6 ,9 R EILEEN*MADDEN 03273 001-400-2101-4312 01472 $19.76 00848 34738' MILES/RECORDS COURSE 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 09/19/90 11 22 23 2° .'I **at VENDOR TOTAL artsair+rn*tttrtritsrit•rttt+r•crit+ttrtttrttittttrtr•ttjtititit*atttittrit+rnitittrtrtt•mir*itititir*irsttritittttt*trtttrsttritsr $19.76 2s 26 2. 21 29 TIT R MAGIC GROWERS 03619 001-400-8146-4309 00015 $92_3.05 0437 00491 34739 29 23 30 PLANTS/DOWNTOWN MEDIANS 0437 09/05/90 CIP 89-146 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $9223.05 09/19/90 3. 2° 32 .'6 *** VENDOR TOTAL *ttartttttt;r**itnitittt•ttttitttarat**tttt;tttjt*it*ittt*ttirtttrtrirtttratit•ttir•tttttt•irtrttarn•ttttttiratat*;tattrjtjtit•it* $923.05 33 3° 27 36 t0 R MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 00426 105-400-2601-4309 00648 $233.35 56075/55231 00842 34740 3) 3n ` MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 55231 08/31/90 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/19/90 39 30 J1 #it# VENDOR TOTAL arts•ttatattt•trititattt n itititiratit�t tttt•�titttatttttatjtitartttitttitirtt•pit•p•iF;t•it-tt•u•it#ttttitit•ttttir�t•�tttitatitttit�tatttttato 32 $233.35 62 31 4.1 36 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 001-400-1212-4188 01862 $850. 01 00041 34741 69 35 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 °6 09/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 °) 3s 69 3) R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 .;`.,105-400-2601-4188 01014 $23.4369 00041 34741 m 3n CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90::- STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $ 39 0.00 09/19/90 s. 92 60 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK ' 01859 109-400-3301-4188 00030 $2.31 00041 34741 63 n` CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 656 9 63 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 110-400-3302-4188 01230 $142.46 00041 34741 6) CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 . • ' PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS99 66 .$0.00 09/19/90 69 69 69 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 145-400-3401-4188 00976 $3.9961 00041 34741 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6z m $0.00 09/19/90 63 9.1 66 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859' 145-400-3402-4188 00980 $1.45 00041 34741 o CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS99 s' $0.00 09/19/90 97 fig 6 3 69 )0 9.1 )1 )2 56 )3 1 251 J J J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 r-4,44., 'Had 4 TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/20/90 ,, . PAY VENDa: zil kg : Igkk61: : : • AMOUNT____---INVLREF PO-_# CHK # N 2 3 . 5 6 7 a 5 6 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • 7 8 9 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 :,- 145-400-3403-4188 00310 $0.46 00041 34741 ., CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 ' 09/15/90 : :' ., '?- '.BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 ,. .,, . , ,.- 9 .0 ,. t 2 10 .. '2 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 155-400-2102-4188 00554 $1.92 00041 34741 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 . 4 13 .. .5 Is R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK . 01859 . 160740073102-4188 00956 ... - $26. 13 00041 34741 .. CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 '09/15/90 .. . ..:.: SEWER/ST DRAIN. -/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 .5 - ., -, - ‘ 7 .6 .5 20 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 705-400-1209-4188 00324 $2.84 00041 34741 17 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 19 2. a a 24 9 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01859 • ,705-40071217-4188 00330 $4.84 . 00041 34741 .00 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90-. ..': . WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 25 25 a a *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $1,059.84 233. 2.. 29 30 32 R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. , 02272 ...,„ 001-400-2101-6900, 00532 • $1,072.55 . . 00059 34742 ,25 LEASE PMT/OCT 90 . 09/15/90: ' - POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 09/19/90 21 . 33 3. n m .!9 R MARQUETTE LEASE SERVICES, INC. 02272 001-400-2101-6900 00533 $1,233.52 00056 34742 .75 LEASE PMT/OCT 90 09/15/90 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 09/20/90 39 31 it** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************% '' $2,306.07 32 33 . . , 35 .0 .. .2 .13 44 34 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00098 $2,965.73 3720/3730 01010 34743 35 REGULAR GAS/CITY YARD /3730 09/05/90 /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 09/19/90 35 .7 .5 37 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. 03060 ., 001-141-0000-1401 00099 $2,998.11 3721/3729 01009 34743 3,3 UNLEADED GAS/CITY YARD /3729 . 09/05/90 : .... ' ' /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 09/19/90 39 .5 50 5,! 40 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00100 *655.83 3718 01008 34743 41 DIESEL FUEL/CITY YARD 3718 09/05/90 /GASOLINE INVENTORY$0.00 09/19/90 .2 53 5. 55 .13 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** . $6, 619. 67 .. .5 56 57 56 m .5 R KIM*MITCHELL 00522 001-400-2101-4312 01473 $115. 18 00849 34744 '3 MILES/DISASTER COURSE .09/11/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 09/19/90 ..E. m 5. 52 53 R KIM*MITCHELL 50 00522 . .001-400-2101-4312- 01474 $77.25 00838 34744 MEALS/P.O.S.T. COURSE 09/10/90 : .. POLICE . '/TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 5. $0.00 09/19/90 5. 55 m 57 52 51 54 m 55 M , 56 . -. - , • . ... .. , .,, . .. : .: --- i. • a Y3• 7,3 n 7y _J J J J _1 -1 . 58) w.) 8 n 2 2. 2 3 30 37 3P 3. 41 43 44 50 51 53 CITY OF,HERMOSA BEACH —SFA34 1 ° 6 n FOR 09/25/90 - TIME 12:20:18 # AMOUNT T FAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMDER T$1l �`([RF� DATE - DATE 09/20/90 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************-**************************************** $192.43 R VALERIE*MOHLER 00956 001-400-1202-4316 00320 $43.39 BOOKS/MATERIALS/FALL 90 09/13/90 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 00180 ' $0.00 34745 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $43.39 ' 7 R PATRICIA*MORGAN 03643 001-400-1206-4316 00097 $66.21 BOOKS/TUITION/FALL 90 09/17/90 DATA PROCESSING /TRAINING 00263 $0.00 34746 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $66.21 z R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY 00091 001-400-1212-4186 01857 $772.20 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00013 $0.00 34747 09/19/90 5 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $772.20 R NATIONAL HOME LIFE 03465 001-400-1212-4188 01860 $76.95 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00065 $0.00 34748 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $76.95 R NATIONAL PARK & REC ASSOC. 00880 001-400-4601-4305 00868 $18.00 SUBSCRIPTION/M. ROONEY 09/05/90 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00708 $0.00 34749 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $18.00 R NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 03532 001-400-2201-4305 00390 $355.50 I-269047-0 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/FIRE 047-0 08/31/90 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 11219 $351.21 34750 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $355.50 R KEVIN B.*NORTHCRAFT 02064 001-400-1201-4305 00171 $10.62 MON EXPENSE/SEP 90 .09/15/90 CITY MANAGER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 09177 $0.00 34751 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************#*********************************************** $10.62 P, OCHOA & SILLAS 03639 705-400-1209-4201 00154 $7.00 5059 MISC. LEGAL EXPENSES 5059 08/31/90 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 09176 $0.00 34752 09/19/90 14 u ]6 '9 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 2n 29 30 3' 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ]9 0 n 5' 56 58 59 62 3 64 5 66 67 GB 69 0 2 3 5 5 • y 3 y 42 .1 J 4] A9 .10 I. 50 51 52 53 55 57 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PACE 3 6 J J J B 9 10 n J 1 6 0 '9 J 20 21 22 23 25 26 2, .J 29 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 26 3, 38 39 40 41 3 44 .r; 46, :6 3I1J 2 a 1 3 75- 7 3 4 J J J,i T TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VNI) # Af'f.f1UNT NUMRFR TRN # AMOUNT TNLLREF AMOUNT DATE 09/20/90 PO—# CHK—# UNENC DATE EXP DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION trim VENDOR TOTAL*****tr*********************•***************•************************** 37. 00 ' R OFFICE OF SELF—INSURANCE PLANS 03640 705-400-1217-4251 00001 $444.42 SELF INSURERS ASSESSMENT 2744 09/12/90 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 2744 10983 30.00 i 34753 09/19/90 3 *** VENDOR TOTAL #*#trot**************************•************************tt***********# 3444. 42 9 R TED#OLIVER & SONS 03594 001-400-3103-4309 01044 $176.78 TREE STAKES 15017 08/30/90 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 15017 00494 $176.78 34754 09/19/90 R TED*OLIVER & SONS 03594 001-400-6101-4309 00940 $176.78 TREE STAKES 15017 08/30/90 : PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 15017 00494 $176.78 34754 09/19/90 ] tr** VENDOR TOTAL*********************#***************************#it•iter******tart****** $353.56 5 R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00604 $300.00 LEGAL SERV/AUG 1990 08/31/90 420001 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 09175 $0.00 00 34755 09. 19/ .O R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 001-400-1131-4201 00605 $7,498.25 LEGAL SERV/AUG 1990 08/31/90 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 09175 $0.00 34755 09/19/90 , R OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE 02892 705-400-1209-4201' 00153 $137.50 LEGAL SERV/AUG 1990 08/31/90 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 09175 $0.00 34755 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL**#tt*******ar*********************tr**** tit** brit#*ir*tt****nu•#tr**tt*triti *** $7,935.75 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 001-400-1212-4188 01856 $1,367.33 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00019 $0.00 34756 09/19/90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 105-400-2601-4188 01012 551.13 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00019 $0.00 34756 09/19/90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 109-400-3301-4188 00028 $6.65 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00019 $0.00 34756 09/19/90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 110-400-3302-4188 01228 $266.72 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 .09/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00019 $0.00 34756 09/19/90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235'-`. 145-400-3401-4188 00974 $6.96 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00019 $0.00 34756 09/19/90 3 6 J J J B 9 10 n J 1 6 0 '9 J 20 21 22 23 25 26 2, .J 29 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 26 3, 38 39 40 41 3 44 .r; 46, :6 3I1J 2 a 1 3 75- 7 3 4 J J J,i T 3 s FINANCE— CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ut:mAN12_1,,I57 TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/200/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PO L. CHIi_# PROJ .4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 145-400-3402-4188 00978 $2.45 00019 34756 ° CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 • ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 155-400-2102-4188 00552 $6.51 00019 34756 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09;19/90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 160-400-3102-4188 00954 $39.25 00019 34756 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 R ORAL HEALTH SERVICES 00235 170-400-2103-4188 00019 333.58 00019 34756 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0. 00 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL it'+rirtt*tFtr*tr#t+trartt*tfit*ttirir*trait***##te*itirairtra*star*irar*trittrtrtc*tr*so-sttt*rrtrir*aat****# $1,780.58 R PACE PUBLICATIONS 02549 001-400-2101-4305 01350 $179.00 BRON9025415AC 00924 34757 SUBSCRIPTION/PD RECORDS 415AC 08/22/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/19/90 • *** VENDOR TOTAL**itarir**#tt+rtrm*##**it*tr*irittratic*it*a**aric*#it*stir*icar*it#tt*unto#tr#tFtricx*#iciranffir*ta ., $179. 00 R PACIFICARE , 00575 001-400-1212-4188 01863 $18,011.17 00016 34758 3 '' CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS r) $0.00 09/19/90 3 R PACIFICARE 00575 .105-400-2601-4168 01015 $486.87 4 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 34758 0.00 09/19/90 R PACIFICARE 00575 109-400-3301-4188 00031 $82.04 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 0$0.0 347581 •' VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 , R PACIFICARE 00575 110-400-3302-4198 01231 $2,57:3.17 4, CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/19/90:. 00016 34758 s PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 30.00 09/19/90 s R PACIFICARE s; 00575 145-400-3401-4188 00977 $77.71 00016 34758 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $O. 00 09/19/90 sc P. PACIFICARE 00575 145-400-3402-4188 00981 '` CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 $27.48 00016 34758 5709/15/90' ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 60 SO. 00 09/19/90 s9 R PACIFICARE 005'75 155-400-2102-4188 00555 `0 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 x65.56 00016 34750 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS62 $0. 00 09/19/90 63 R PACIFICARE 00575.` 160-400-3102-4186 00957 64 ' CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEEOBENEFITS 00016 34759 ti6 $O. 00 09/19/90 6, 66 69 70 n rz ,3 I i - 3 j 8 0 2 5 0 9 0 5 6 0 3 1 J r 5 9 3 3: 3- 3'. 3 31 3' 41 42 43 44 45 47 5 r 5 5, V l sr, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PA(F 3 s 6 7 9 15 10 19 20 3 J J 35 J 26 > 30 40 a.: 43 47 40 9 50 s2 sa r7 56 70 2 74 7 J J TIME 12:20:16 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VJ1D # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/RFF DATE 09/20/90 PO # CHK_# UNENC DATE EXP DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1 R PACIFICARE 00575 170-400-2103-4188 00021 3632.47 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90. SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 30.00 34750 09/19/90 R PACIFICARE 00575 705-400-1209-4136 00325 3116.34 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 30.00 34753 09/19/90 R PACIFICARE 00575 705-400-1217-4188 00331 8118.74 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 90.00 34758 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 322/696.57 R PAGENET 02487 ' 001-400-1201-4201 00096 911.50 PAGING SERV/SEP 90 09/01/90 . CITY MANAGER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00049 30.00 34759 09/19/90 , R PAGENET 02487 001-400-2101-4307 00237 3187.22 PAGING SERV/SEP 90 09/01/90 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE 00049 90.00 34759 09/19/90 ' R PAGENET 02487 001-400-2401-4201. 00253 311.50 PAGING SERV/SEP 90 09/01/90- ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00049 80.00 34759 09/19/90 ' R PAGENET 02487 001-400-4202-4201 00281 311.50 PAGING SERV/SEP 90 09/01/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00049 $0.00 34759 09/19/90 R PAGENET 02487 , 705-400-1210-4324 00026 3212.43 715-0739 REPLACE LOST PAGER -0738 09/01/90 '.. AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 00930 80.00 34759 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL************ar***********************ar******************************* 9434.15 R • PATRICK & CO. 01634 „-. 001-400-2401-4305 00168 3199.15 6456 ANIMAL LICENSE TAGS 6456 09/07/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00241 3199.15 34760 09/19/90 ar** VENDOR TOTAL*******************tririt*ttirtrjtttirtttt#artFittr*ttattrittrirttrtirit#arttttttirtt*irirtrt±it*ttsrtrir*** 3199. 15 R PEP BOYS 00608 -<'001-400-2201-4311 00359 812.25 015759 MISC. CHARGES/SEP 90 15759 09/11/90'. .FIRE . /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00953 30.00 34761 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****######to-#****tiff********************###**#*it********************** 912.25 R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. . 02746 ;001-400-1212-4188 01859 8279.99 GARDO7C EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RDO7C 09/01/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00011 30.00 34762 09/19/90 1 3 s 6 7 9 15 10 19 20 3 J J 35 J 26 > 30 40 a.: 43 47 40 9 50 s2 sa r7 56 70 2 74 7 J J FINANCE— CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH , I TIME PAY 12:20•18 VENDOR NAME VND # DATE INVC lArirlA0119)/1190 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INVLBEF AMOUNT • EAGE_____0028 DATE UNENC 09/20/90 51 6 7 DESCRIPTION DATE EXP 9 R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RD07C 02746 09/01/90 105-400-2601-4188 01013 STREET LIGHTING $5.19 /EMPLOYEE BENEF/TS GARDO7C 00011 s0.00 34762 09/19/90 ti t i R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RDO7C 02746 09/01/90 109-400-3301-4188 00029 VEH PKG DIST $0.20 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS GARDO7C 00011 $0.00 34762 09/19/90 R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RDO7C 02746 09/01/90 110-400-3302-4188 01229 PARKING ENF $35.19 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS GARDO7C 00011 $0.00 34762 09/19/90 17 18 , R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RDO7C 02746 09/01/90 145-400-3401-4188 00975 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS GARDO7C 00011 $0.00 34762 09/19/90 d R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RDO7C 02746 09/01/90 145-400-3402-4188 00979 ESEA $0.39 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS34762 GARDO7C 00011 $0.00 09/19/90 R PERSONAL. PERFORMANCE CONS. EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RDO7C 02746 09/01/90 145-400-3403-4188 00309GARDO7C BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00011 $0.00 34762 09/19/90 ' : , , R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RDO7C 02746 09/01/90 155-400-2102-4188 00553 CROSSING GUARD $0.41 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS GARDO7C 00011 $0.00 34762 09/19/90 3 3 ' R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RDO7C 02746 09/01/90 160-400-3102-4188 00955 SEWER/ST DRAIN $5.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS GARDO7C 00011 $0.00 34762 09/19/90 3 3 a 3 : 3 R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RDO7C 02746 09/01/90 705-400-1209-4188 00323 LIABILITY INS $0.51 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS GARDO7C 00011 $0.00 34762 09/19/90 4 4 4 , 7 R PERSONAL PERFORMANCE CONS. EMP ASSIST PROG/OCT 90 RDO7C 02746 09/01/90 705-400-1217-4188 00329 WORKERS COMP $1.02 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS GARDO7C 00011 $0.00 34762 09/19/90 4 4 4 ) ) ) *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $330.00 4 5 ' R PHOENIX GROUP SOFTWARE MAINT/OCT—DEC90 44-00 02530 09/01/90 001-400-1206-4201 00761 DATA PROCESSING $655.00 4944-00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00071 $0.00 34763 09/19/90 5 5 5 R PHOENIX GROUP 02530 110-400-3302-4201 00253 $143.36 4984-00 OUT—OF—STATE CITES/AUG90 84-00 09/11/90 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR/VAT 00063 .$0.00 34763 09/19/90 s, T *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $798.36 6, 6 6, 6 R PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE MACHINE MAINT 21410 00222 07/01/90 001-400— 208-4201 00686 GEN APPROP $232.30 221410 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 08033 $0.00 34764 09/19/90 6, 6,:, 6 61 W 71 i 7- 74 75 79 4 6 8 10 2 3 5 6 9 0 2 3 4 6 8 9 0 2 J J .1 3 3 42 43 45 J47 53 54 55 556 CITY OF HERMOSA PEACH rE— �r 2 3 0 e J J 30 .J 312 -} G i7 10 J 20 21 22 23 -) 211 n 30 3, 32 33 34 3s .J 36 37 3n 3e 40 41 .12 43 J 44 4s 46 I 47 e 4^ 50 s' J 60 61 62 c3 54 63 66 67 6n 1111 70 71 22 u 74 76 7% J. J TIME 12:2O:18 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VEND.DH NAME VND # ACCOUNLNULII3ER T N__41 AMOUNT tNVLREE_—_ DATE 09/20/90 _ DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT .P0 .# UNENC _CHK _.# DATE EXP IIl R PITNEY BOWES 00222 001-400-1208-4201 00687 $261.21 009138 POSTAGE MACHINE RESET 09138 08/14/90 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT S'ERVICF_/PRIVAT 08032 $0.00 34764 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************.************************************ $493. 51 R ENRICO*POZZUOLI 00221 001-210-0000-2110 0:3895 $375.00 95578 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 95578 09/13/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 00564 $0.00 34765 09/19/90 R ENRICO*POZZUOLI 00221 001-210-0000-2110 03897 $1,550.00 95578 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 95578 09/13/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 00563 $0.00 34765 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,925.00 R PRINTMASTERS 00350 110-400-3302-4309 00704 $118.49 21762 METER WORK ORDERS 21762 09/06/90 . PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00254 $118.49 34766 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $118.49 R PTO SALES 03629 001-400-3103-4311 00602 $38.14 LA54127 ELGIN SWEEPER CABLE 54127 09/13/90 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01028 $0.00 34767 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $38.14 R RAMADA SUITES 036:30 001-400-2101-4312 01467 $216.00 HOTEL/D. LOUGHIN 09/09/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 00836 $0.00 34768 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $216.00 R READICARE—DANIEL FREEMAN 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00334 $312.00 94-40464 EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS/AUG9O 40484 08/31/90 PERSONNEL /PRE—EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 10980 $0.00 34769 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $312.00 R BETTY*RYAN 03631 001-300-0000-3801 02025 $40.00 04372 REFUND INSPECTION FEE 04372 08/28/90 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 00622 $0.00 34770 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.00 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 01746 *74.99 25-81175 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 81175 08/31/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00859 *0.00 34771 09/19/90 2 3 0 e J J 30 .J 312 -} G i7 10 J 20 21 22 23 -) 211 n 30 3, 32 33 34 3s .J 36 37 3n 3e 40 41 .12 43 J 44 4s 46 I 47 e 4^ 50 s' J 60 61 62 c3 54 63 66 67 6n 1111 70 71 22 u 74 76 7% J. J 3 3 4 51 53 :r. .4110 FINANCE—SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH =MAAITI 1 TCT . • ' TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TR' AMOUNT INVLREF DATE PO.__#__.._____CHK__#_ AMOUNT UNENC 09/20/90 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE EXP t*t*t* VENDOR TOTAL*****************************tt*****it****4**********tt.*;rte************ $74.99 ' R SIR SPEEDY 00361 001-400-4601-4302 00099 $139.06 ASAP PROG FLYER/COMM RES 12213 09/04/90 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING 12213 00706 $138.07 34772 09/19/90 R SIR SPEEDY 00361 001-400-4601-4302 00100 $122.06 COASTAL CLEANUP FLYER 12213 • 09/04/90 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING 12213 00705 $122.05 34772 09/19/90 7 . t*t*t* VENDOR TOTAL * ************************************tr*********+t************n******* $260. 12 11 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-1101-4305 00330 $90.68 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 37120 08/31/90 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 437120 00860 $0.00 34773 09/19/90 R SMART &•.FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-2101-4306 00854 $60.94 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 36802 08/31/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 436902 00860 $0.00 34773 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ##irttitit*ititit;brit*it*itir;rititirtttriritititarirititirtr*srsrtrtt*jtaritiriririritititir3t*ttitiritir*itittt;rititsririt $151. 62 ' ' R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER 00113 001-400-2101-4309 00337 $41.63 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08383 08/31/90 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 08383 00861 $0.00 34774 09/19/90 t*t*t* VENDOR TOTAL * ************tri****************tat*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*********************f**** *** $41. 63 R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL 00107 001-400-2101-4201 00644 $111.33 EMERG. PRISONER SERVICES 39604 08/17/90 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 8639604 00923 $0.00 34775 09/19/90 t*t*t* VENDOR TOTAL t*t******************************art****t*t**************t***************** $111.33 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 36098 $18,798.00 CITE SURCHARGE/AUG 90 08/31/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING 00179 $0.00 34776 09/19/90 t*t*t* VENDOR TOTAL t*t*t*t*trim*trt*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*itt*trt*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*i*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*tart*t*t*t*.µt*t*t*.p..p..x.t<.pt*.a.t*ir*.x.*trt*t* $18,798.00 R SOUTH BAA' MUNICIPAL COURT 00400 110-300-0000-3302 36099 $129.00 CITATION COURT BAIL .09/17/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING 00264 $0.00 34777 09/19/90 r *** VENDOR TOTAL t*t*t*trt*t*t*trt*t*trtrt*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*trt*t*tw*t*t*t*t*t*t*trt*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*trt*t*t*t*t*trt*t*t*trt*t*t*t*t*t*t*t*trt*t*t*t*tr $129.00 , R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-2201-4309 00957 $20.82 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00862 $0.00 34778 09/19/90 7 e 3 4 6 B ,0 u 14 5 J ,5 17 ,6 ,9 J 20 23 22 23 24 25 26 7.. 27 29 29 30 3' 32 33 14 _, 35 3.' 37 30 _. 39 40 2 :3 '6 f7 "3 5 4 0• 9 0 7 8 0 2 5 3 7 t 3 3 3 'A 5, 53 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PArr ° TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 i PAY VFNP*; LZil k, . _ ■UNT NUMBER TRN t AMOUNT UNULREF AMOUNT DATE 09/20/90 PQ # CHK_#E UNENC DATE EXP DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 . . 001-400-3103-4309 01045 $13.95 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 .ST MAINTENANCE. /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00862 $0.00 34778 09/19/90 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-3104-4309 00557 $13.95 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00862 $0.00 34778 09/19/90 trtrtr VENDOR TOTAL****************************************ear********#it**************** $48.72 n R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-2101-4303 00009 $63.69 ELEC BILLINGS/AUG 90 08/31/90 POLICE /UTILITIES 00863 $0.00 34779 09/19/90 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00109 $36.53 ELEC BILLINGS/AUG 90 08/31/90 MEDIANS /UTILITIES 00863 $0.00 34779 09/19/90 2 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00056 $533.01 ELEC BILLINGS/AUG 90 08/31/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES 00863 $0.00 34779 09/19/90 ' R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00407 $7,612.75 ELEC BILLINGS/AUG 90 08/31/90 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 00863 $0.00 34779 09/19/90 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00320 $4,672.05 ELEC BILLINGS/AUG 90 08/31/90 PARKS /UTILITIES 00863 $0.00 34779 09/19/90 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. . 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00257 $163.90 ELEC BILLINGS/AUG 90 ' 08/31/90 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES 00863 $0.00 34779 09/19/90 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00141 $33.52 ELEC BILLINGS/AUG 90 08/31/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES 00863 $0.00 34779 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL *crit*********tfatittt**3ritstitaititittr*"aittHrtttrit**tris#jtta****irtfitttit****tri ***hair**iritic $13,115.45 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00258 $13,413.76 ST. LITE BILLS/AUG 90 08/31/90 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES 00012 $0.00 34780 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL +char**tr*ir*tr#tr*n*###*tr#tr**#**##ar*#tra*+r#tr#*3r#irir*tr*#srir*erir+tiririr*tr#♦r*#ir#*ir $13,413.76 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00408 $322.01 GAS BILLINGS/AUG 90 08/31/90 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 00864 $0.00 34781 09/19/90 aaa VENDOR TOTALaaaaaaaaatr*trtrtr*trtrtrtrtrtrtttrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrif;Etrtrtrtr tt"trtrtrtr*tr*trtrtrtttrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtttrtrtrtrtrtr*trtr $322.01 R SPARKLETTS DP.INKING WATER CORP(00146 001-400-4601-4305 00865 $63.62 WATER COOLER RENT/AUG 90 46743 08/31/90 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 0846743 00033 $0.00 34782 09/19/90 , 1 J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ,' 3 TIME 12:20:18 FOR^09/25/90 DATE 09 2/ 0//90 PAY VEMD(j$ NQ[1E VND # ACCOUNT NUMIIE_R TR1 AMf1UNT TL7IVJPEF z 6 P.17_4L _CHL__#____ DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 c l'a *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************jtatit�tjtit-trititiriririttr*artrititirat****tris-***** $63.62 'o I R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00286 $,106.00 2549 00027 783 .3SWEEPER SERV/JULY 90 2548 07/31/90 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/19/90 i s i3i R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE_ CO 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00287 $3,106.00 2561 00027 34783 SWEEPER SERV/AUG 90 2561 08/31/90. ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/19/90 ,5 6 ,9 16 ,3SWEEPER ,O R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 109-400-3301-4201 00006 $3,837.00 2548 00027 34783 SERV/JULY 90 2548 07/31/90 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 O9/19/90 70 o 's z, R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 109-400-3301-4201 00007 $3,937.00 2561 00027 34783 SWEEPER SERV/AUG 90 2561 OB/31/90 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/19/90 2a m 226 3 z3 ,a *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************at**+tit*******nit;ttrjt*it**ttttit*itatitirtFi+atit****n-;tff+titt}*+ *** $13,886.00 26 z' 30 23 R STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00364 001-400-2101-4251 00323 $74.00 884867 00023 3478433 6 FINGERPRINT APPS/JULY 90 84867 08/20/90 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 30.00 09/19/90 2 34 as . 0 3n 31 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $74.00 3] 39 39 32 33 3q R SUPREME SALES CO., INC. 00494 ' 001-400-2101-4306 00858 $64.87 76785 00918 34785 PRISONER. TOOTHBRUSHES 76785 OB/31/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $65.00 09/19/90 40 q' a3 3s 5 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************************************��**** $64. 87 u °� :6 9, 38 3, R SWIFT LABORATORIES '02308 001-400-2101-4306 00857 $64.05 75548 00919 34786 EXAM GLOVES/JAIL 75548 09/07/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $64.05 09/19!90 4a 4n so a qz *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $64.05 32 53 , a 55 44 a5 35 R LYNN A.*TEP.RY 03061 001-400-2101-4316 00589 $381.35 01030 34787 REIMQ TUITION/BOOKS • 09/17/90 POLICE /TRAINING 50. 00 09/19/90 55 " O 5-9 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 60 4,3 . 4so $381.35 62 • 63 s, 52 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY. 00124 001-400-6101-4309 00941 $48.86 1-167678 00968 34788 MISC. CHARGES/SEP 90 67678 09/10/90 PARKS.. /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/19/90 64 `5 6G 67 i3 54 I se 6a V. ]O ], • ]2 ]6 '251 uJ 1) 1.i • 1 2 2 3 32 33 33 35 5 3'! 30 39 49 0 51 52 53 54 55 56 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r INANL .-5rt.V+U .,r 11n.,,., . . -3. TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 - VND # ACC[7UNT NIJMRFR TEN # AMIII WT TNV /REF DATE -FO ; AMOUNT UNENC 09/20/90 -CHK. PAY VFNL'OR NAME DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL *Fir***************************************************************** $48.86'. P TOUCH OF CLASS 03623 001-400-2201-4309 00954 $37.36 ALUM. POLISH/FIRE EQUIP 0806 09/11/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0806 11237 $37.36 34789 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $37.36 4 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 001-400-1212-4188 01855 $231.94 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00029 $0.00 34790 09/19/90 R. TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 105-400-2601-4188 01011 $1.52 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00029 $0.00 34790 09/19/90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 145-400-3401-4188 00973 $0.94 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00029 $0.00 34750 09/19/90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 .. 145-400-3402-4188 00977 $0.38 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00029 $0.00 34790 09/19/90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 160-400-3102-4188 00953 $3.04 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00029 $0.00 34790 09/19/90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00322 $3.17 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00029 $0.00 34790 09/19/90 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00328 $3.17 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00027 $0.00 34790 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $244.16 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2101-4306 00852 . $36.49 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 00870 $0.00 34791 09/19/90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 . 001-400-2101-4309 00336 $10.93 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00870 $0.00 34791 09/19/90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2201-4309 00953 $11.78 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00870 $0.00 34791 09/19/90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE ' 00123. • 001-400=2201-4311 00358 $12.15 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90. FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00870 $0.00 34791 09/19/90 2 J .J J B 10 11 15 16 19 19 20 21 22 23 3] 38 39 40 34 35 40 47 8 .I5 0 52 55 J 68 19 .J 09 62 64 65 66 67 60 70 n n ../ ,4 ,5 J J r 2 J 3 .11 42 43 44 45 51 52 53 Sa 5' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH s " " w " TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND if • ACCD.UNT NUMBER TRN # • AMOUNT INVLREF DATE PO # AMOUNT UNENC 09/20/90 CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE EXP R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2401-4309 00155 $11.51 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00870 $0.00 34791 09/19/90 ' R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-3103-4309 01043 $27.07 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00870 $0.00 34791 09/19/90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-4204-4309 01742 $506.46 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 . BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00870 $0.00 34791 09/19/90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-6101-4309 00938 $144.04 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 OB/31/9O PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00870 $0.00 34791 09/19/90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-6101-4309 00939 $41.45 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00870 50.00 34791 09/19/90 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 110-400-3302-4309 00703 $20.81 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00870 $0.00 34791 09/19/90 R TRIANGLE•HARDWARE 00123 110-400-3302-5401 00043 $48.02 MISC CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 PARKING ENF /EQUIP—LESS THAN $500 00870 $0.00 34791 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************a********************rarer************************** $870. 71 R UNIFORM DELIGHT . 02486 001-400-2201-4187 00255 $140.77 BOOTS/J. CARROLL 53063 . 09/05/90.:. FIRE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 53063 11233 $140.27 34792 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************tit******************************#irirtrttx****tr*trttirittt******* $140. 77 R THE#UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 .. 001-400-1212-4188 01850 $737.63 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 ': EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS 00028 $0.00 34793 09/19/90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 105-400-2601-4188 01008 $15.60 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS 00028 $0.00 34793 09/19/90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL' LIFE INS CO. 02355 109-400-3301-4188 00025 $1.76 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 ..'. 09/15/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00028 '$0.00 34793 09/19/90 P. THE*UNIdN CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 110-400-3302-4188 01224 $148.40 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00028 $0.00 34793 09/19/90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE.INS CO. 02355 145-400-3401-4188 00969 $4.16 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00028 $0.00 34793 09/19/90 ' 1 5 4�: 5 12 3 3 1 3. 3 3. 1 3' 11 3 1 3' 41 4] 1 44 46 1 47 1 50 51 52 1 53 54 1 56 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TIME FAY 12:20:18 VFNDf1R NAME VND # DATE INVC FOR 09/25/90 ACCf IINLNUMBFP TRU— AMOUNT TNWREF.-- PROJ tt ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE 09/20/90 $ DESCRIPTION ----.--.PO. —SS.._—_—CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 145-400-3402-4188 00973 $1.52 00028 34793 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS =0.00 09/19/90 P THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 145-400-3403-4188 00306 $0.48 00028 34793 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 155-400-2102-4188 00549 $1.85 '00028 34793 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 160-400-3102-4188 00950 $22.00 00028 34793 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 170-400-2103-4188 00016 $30.00 00028 34793 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 • SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 705-400-1209-4188 00319 $2.96 00028 34793 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $$O.00 09/19/90 R THE*UNION CENTRAL LIFE INS CO. 02355 705-400-1217-4188 00324 $5.04 00028 34793 CITY HEALTH INS/OCT 90 09/15/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $971.40 R UNION WAR SURPLUS 03642 . 110-400-3302-4187 00248 . $42.17 021077 00262 34794 CROSSING GUARD HATS 21077 09/05/90 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $0.00 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************air******************Matte*********.******************** $42. 17 R VICTEL—SOUTH BAY 03598 001-400-1208-4305 00809 $121.70 1795 08031 34795 FAX PAPER 1795 09/04/90 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $121.70 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL tr***************'***************ar***at********a*******************'**** • $121. 70 R J. S. *WARD & CO. AS AGENT FOR 02466 705-400-1209-4324 00150 $11,609.12 10981 34796 LIABILITY CLAIMS/AUG 90 08/31/90 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $0.00 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****_*********n*.eE->t**at*tttt***************************at********tt****** $11, 609. 12 P WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 00131 001-400-3104-4309 00558 $1,696.69 180854 00434 34797 STREET SIGNS/CITY—WIDE 00854 09/07/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $1,525.58 09/19/90 3 9 30 12 13 1a 15 16 10 19 20 23 22 23 24 26 27 20 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 35 37 30 39 40 12 3 10 0 i J 35 6 w r 6P r0 r1 2 5 -I FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DFiiiiND LIST E ,GG• 0 ...:;*•.t_it,�,. -•• d .t...i''nt1 it , Sy Dy 2. 7J Jy Y TE TIME 12:20:18 FOR 09/25/90 DATE 09/20/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOIM_ NUMFER TPN f AMOUNT INV/REE____._._____P_O_.:#L__._.__CHK_A' 2 3 0 s DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 4L ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP q 0 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************************•It******** $1,696.69 0 12 R SALLY A. *WHITE 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00274 $136.00 10863 34798 SEC SERV/SEP 4, 90 09/10/90 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/19/90 3 14 ,s 16 13 *** VENDOR. TOTAL. ****************************************************** *********#### $136.00 , 16 20 w IH R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00258 $945.93 526678018 00007 34799 COPIER LEASE/SEP 90 76018 09/01/90 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 09/19/90 21 22 z3 74 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00259 $321.83 526678411 00020 34799 COPIER LEASE/SEP 90 78411 09/01/90 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 09/19/90 211 zs 26 27 26 22 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00260 $238.72 526678410 00021 34799 2 3 COPIER LEASE/SEP 90 78410 09/01/90 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 09/19/90 24 ;; 31 32 `' R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2201-6900 00127 $47.74 526678407 00026 34799 26 COPIER LEASE/SEP 90 78407 09/01/90 FIRE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 09/19/90 2, 33 34 75 36 23 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2401-6900 00072 $56.15 526678408 00024 34799 '^ 2 COPIER LEASE/SEP 90 78408 09/01/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 09/19/90 30 31 3P 30 40 31 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-4601-6900 00073 $189.65 526678409 00025 34799 32 COPIER LEASE/SEP 90 - 78409, 09/01/90`- - .COMM RESOURCES /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 09/19/90 33 ' .42 .4 .10 4, 34 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 110-400-3302-6900 00157 $114.40 526678408 00024 34799 3s COPIER LEASE/SEP 90 78408 09/01/90 PARKING ENF /LEASE PAYMENTS 40.00 09/19/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL###*##**#*********************************************************** $1,914.42 35 10, ,, I •:z '''0 R TIMOTHY*YALDA 03637 001-210-0000-2110 03900 $50.00 5067 00569 34800 41 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 5067 09/13/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 09/19/90 42 '' so 41 *** VENDOR. TOTAL#*****#***#***#**#*****#***********#******************************** $50.0057, 4.1 4t. 6 59 4 6 R DOREEN*PARSON 03624 001-300-0000-3812 00236 $293.00 95896 10861 34801 4' REFUND C. U. P. APP 95896 .09/05/90 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW $O. 00 09!19/90 .18 Co 61 n] ### VENDOR TOTAL##############*##*##**##**##*####*#ii.######•!tit##**##########**####*###$293.001 HCRCBY CLRTItY THHAT THE DEMANDS ORCLAIMSCOVE 50 THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGE 51TO INCLUSIVE OF E5) -1 `' 52 WARRANT-REGISTERFOR - - -/ ' #** PAY CODE TOTAL ##*********####*#tt**#####**###tt*##*it#*##*t�•##.It.µ#*.#.tt.*.p.it#.n.,n.**#.k.n*.*##*• -S 53 $206, 799. 54 AND FUN ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT THEREOFREACC,IR4 BY 0 71 12 'MANCE-ADMINI TRATOR *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $879.333.09 :r, DATE�i JD ,3 a 75. ...:;*•.t_it,�,. -•• d .t...i''nt1 it , Sy Dy 2. 7J Jy Y TE September 20, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 25, 1990 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS, AUGUST 1990 Attached are the financial reports for August 1990. Revenue in the General Fund is 10.4%, however after adjusting for property taxes, revenue would be 15.14%. Parking Fund revenue is 20.3% received which is normal during summer months. Expenditures in the General Fund are in line with budget at 15.7% expended for 16% of the year. Parking Fund expenditures are 16.2% expended. Concur: Ievin B. North aft City Manager Attachments Viki Copeland Finance Director ldci) 2 2 2 2 2. 2' 3. 3 3 3 3 4 s • 1. 3 FINANCE-FA484 ,'"REVENUE TIME 12:35:02 FROM CITY fIF HERMfI4A REACH SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) 08/01/90 .TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0001 DATE 09/19/90 .YEAR -COMP) F'T 5 o FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 1b 07 1]F UNREALIZED BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 3 DEPARTMFNT 0000 3100 TAXES 2 3101 /CURRENT YEAR SFCURFD 3.035.712 00 0 00 0 00 3.03.5,712 0• • • ' 3102 /CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 3103 ., " 207, 756. 00 : ' 185, 967. 55 185, 967. 55 21, 788. 45 89. 5 s /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 3106 /SUES. r ► a : ■ e : 53, 000. 00• _107, 580. 06- 63, 188. 63- 1 16, 188. 63 119. 2 : • • •f) 00 0 00 0_00 80.000 On • • ' 3107 /TRANSFER TAX 3108 116, 244. 00 492. 91 14, 863. 92 101, 380. 08 12. 7 6 /SALES TAX 3110 /CAMP TV FRANC.HISF 1, 929, 824. 00 41, 500. 00 114.000 00 :10.A10 57 166, 500. 00 3n. Ain 57 1, 763, 324. 00 83._389_43 8. 6 26 H 3111 /ELECTRIC FRANCHISE 3112 • 39.882.00-: 0.00 0. 00 39.882. 00 0. 0 /GAS FRANCHISE 3113 /REEUSE_FBANCHTSF 29, 603. 00 0. 00 • 0. 00 29, 603. 00 0. 0 2 147.000 00 1 R. 26A 34 25.. 427 31 121.-.572. 69 17.2 2 2 3114 /TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY 3115 277, 175. 00 27, 127. 27 45, 961. 35 231, 213. 65 16. 5 /BUSINESS LICENSE OBJECT 425, 000. 00 31, 436. 20 92, 577. 58 332, 422. 42 21.7 SUBTOTAI A. 455. 19A 00 227. F12n 7R 495, 710 65 5. 956.-476.-35 3 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS ' 3702 • /110P 1 IrENSFR 17-107 00. 271_-50 619,-00 16, 488.-00 ' 3203 /BICYCLE LICENSES 270. 00 10. 0 300. 00 12. 00 30. 00 3204 /BUILDING PERMITS 170, 000. 00 20, 830. 83 32, 720. 12 137, 279. Be 19. 2 3 • - - 2. 40.,-000_-00 1,226_00 '1,592 n0 36.-408-00 3206 /PLUMBING PERMITS • 32, 000: 00 2, 129. 00 : 3, 437. 00 28, 563. 00 10. 7 3207 , /OCCUPANCY PERMITS .' 4, 600. 00 800. 00 '. 1. 925. 00 ' 2, 675. 00 41. 8 3209 !GARAGE -SALES SO. --00 9.00 30,-00 3211 /BANNER PERMITS 50:-00 1, 000. 00 3 . 23.0 1, 300. 00 200. 00 300. 00 3212 /ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 800.00 50.00 100.00 700. 00 12. 5 4 9213 /ANTMAI RFT)FMPTTIIN FFF 3. 500 00___________720 00 1.060 00 2.440..-0• • '3 3214 .' /AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 'SUBTOTAL' 540.00 120.00 340.00 200. 00 62.9 OBJECT 270 227`00 .26, 42B. 33 • 44, 153. 12 • 226, 073. 88 16. 3 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 /VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS 115,000.00 25,843.00 39,223.67 75.776.33 34.1 1303 /r1t1RT FTNFS/Pf1I Tf F fFPT 51.000 nn 7,,,_54/ 13 11• 427 94 34. -, s OBJECT SUBTOTAL 166, 000. 00 33, 389. 13 • 50, 651. 61 • 522_0 115, 348. 39 30.5 3400 NSF OF JMMNPV R, PR0PFRTY - 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 194, 701.00 141, 311. 43- 46, 951. 55- 241, 652. 55 24.1 6 6 3402 /RENTS & CONCESSIONS 2, 000. 00 423. 79 718. 95 1, 281. 05 35.9 fi 3401 /PTFR RFVFNt1F 10.700 00 1.110 A0 2. 5RA 20 8.113 8• 3404 /COMM CTR LEASES 84, 000. 00 '.- ' 7, 270. 40 14, 279. 23 69, 720. 77 16. 9 66 3405 .. • /COMM CTR RENTALS 52, 000. 00 .4; 541. 25 7, 981. 25 44, 018. 75 15. 3 6 1406 /rnMM cTR THJRE ` 38._000.-00 764-24 2546__00 15._454.0 6 3411 /OTHER FACILITIES 13, 142. 35 - 45.2 ;, 24, 000. 00 6, 756. 00 10, 857. 65 3412 /TENNIS COURTS 12, 000. 00 739. 00 1, 590. 05 10, 409. 95 13.2 • • 3 5 fi ; e 0 3 0 3 e J J u 0 • J J 4 0 2 2 2 • 2 • 3 3 3 3 • 3 .,i 42 4 44cr 4e 47 51 ° ° r r TY nF NERMOSA-BEACH FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY TIME 12:35:02 FROM 08/01/90 TO REPORT 08/31/90. (BY FUND) • PAGE 0002 DATE 09/19/90 YEAR --COMPLETE FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 16 07 OF UNREALIZED BALANCE 7. 001 GENERAL FUND DFPARTMFNT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3418 /4PFCTAI FVFNTS 9a...000 00 3.-302_.00 32-202--00 342-098.-O0 10. 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 455, 401. 00 115. 596._15- • 2, 490. 22- 457. 891. 22 O. 5 5 35-00 TNTERC0,LERN____ MPNIT41 /QTA'1-R • 3504 /IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 3505 333.00 188.82 188. 82 144. 18 56.7 6 /IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 3507 /1 -ITC 734, 614. 00 '3..00-0^00 65, 000. 00 . " 119, 635. 61 1 294. 06 0. 00 . 119, 635. 61 1.294.06 0. 00 614, 978. 39 1,-705. 91 65. 000. 00 16. 2 13,-1-------- . 0. 0 ° 3509 /HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE 3510 • /POST 1911 /GT.CSVr nnF_F TRA1NS1yG • .. 42. 000. 00 • . 0. 00 7, 519. 13 34, 480. 87 17. 9 8.-500..80 0. 00 0-00- 8, 500.. 00 0-0 3514 17. 2 /CIGARETTE TAX OBJECT SUBTOTAL 37, 207. 00 6, 400. 86 6. 400. 86 30, 806. 14 890, 654. 00 127, 519. 35 135, 038. 48 755, 615. 52 15. 1 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3801 /RESIDENTIAL• INSPECTION ; :3807 • 9.000. 00 • 680. 00. 1, 120. 00 7, 880. 00 • 12. 4 /RIGN RFV IFW 1.000 On - 1'75 nn 30.0..00 700 '3Q 3803 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 3806 00 4, 605. 00 O 24. 1 6, 075. 00 230. 00 1, 470. 00 /BOARD OF APPEALS 2808 300. 00 0. 00 0. 00 300. 00 0. 0 3 / CINF VAR TAIRCF RFV rc, 1 1 9 In nn n 00 5 850 00 , 225. 00 0 00 • 225. 00 1. 920...00 5, 625. 00 0 0 3. 8 , 3809 /TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW 3810 /FINAL MAP REVIEW , 2, 250. 00 ' 250. 00 875. 00 1, 375. 00 38. 8 1811 /7DNE_CHANGE_RFt) TFLI 1. 800 00 0 on 450.--00 12-350 4 3812 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW -00 20, 690: 00 25 0 11.0 4 23, 250. 00 1, 600. 00 2, 560. 00 3813 /PLAN CHECK FEES 105, 000. 00 5, 040. 74 21, 558. 32 83, 441. 68 20. 5' 4 3814 /PI ANNTN8/7f7NTN(1 APPFAI 2.112 00 26/. 50 21-th 50 1. 865_5f1 12 5 4 3815 /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 10. 000. 00 2, 475. 67 5, 744. 52 ' 4, 255. 48 57. 4 5 3817 /SPECIAL CURB MARKING • 300.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 33. 3 5 3818 /POI TCF SER.LLCFS 17. 00o.11n 10, 200. 00 1.712^50' 1. 275. 00 '3.22ZQo 2, 295. 00 11773 00 7, 905. 00 18 9 5 22.5 6 3819 /JAIL SERVICES 3820 /TRUSTY ADMIN FEE 200. 00 0. 00 0. 00 200. 00 0. 0 3821 /FTNRFRPRTNT RFRVTrF 2 500 nn 247 50 577 50 2'1 5' 3823 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY:. . • 45, 000. 00 4, 785. 00 "' • 6, 545. 00 1.927 50 38, 455. 00 1 14. 5 3824 . /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES 3, 000. 00 438. 00 936. 00 2, 064. 00 31.2 J 3829 /BIM Tr NOTICF PnSTTN(, 80 nn ' 10 00 1-01_00 70 00 12 5 6 3826 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES 41, 800. 00 205. 00 5, 469. 00 36, 331. 00 13.0 6 3827 /LIBRAR.Y GROUNDS MA INT 4, 788. 00 0. 00 4, 788. 00 0. 00 100. 0 6 3831 /STRFFT -CUT TN.SPFCTTfTN 15.000 00 1.875 00 2 '389 11 12,_610_87 15 9 6 3834 /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 17. 600. 00 __. '' 841. 50 4, 302. 40 13. 297. 60 24. 4 6 3836 /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE .7, 500. 00 • 423. 00 930. 60 6, 569. 40 12. 4 6 3837 /RFT(IRNFD CHFCK CHAE(:F ROO nn 50.._Qn 120__0.0 680 00 15 n 6 3838 /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO 800. 00 119. 00 172. 80 627. 20 21.6 ;, 3839 /PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 1, 000. 00 93. 45 329. 55 670. 45 32. 9 7 7, • 3 4 5 6 8 9 0 4 0 4 5 6 0 2 3 4 5 2 3 5 402 3- 1 2 3 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 12:35:02 5 lir l!t-_2t.NJ1U79.J3t,AC'H REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY.FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0003 DATE 09/19/90 16 07 OF YEAR_..COMPLE.TE- 2 3 a 5 FUND 013J DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE UNREALIZED BALANCE % 6 7 ' 001 GENERAL FUND DEL'ARTMENT 0000 8, 500 no 26, 500. 00 900.00 96Q__0.0 200.00 500.00 2.000 00 1, 000. 00 • 0. 00 ' 3..20 235_1)0 3, 710. 00 0. 00 0 00 0. 00 228. 43 0 00 60. 00 0. 00 0^00 975 50 6, 055. 00 0. 00 0 00 30.00 911. 62 0._00 140. 00 200. 00 O. 7 524 50 11 4 9 10 12 13 10 s 16 12 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3840 /ACIASJL.ANCE_TRANSPORT " 5 3841 /POLICE TOWING 3856 /GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 3857 /PKG_PLAFLAPPI TCAT TnN 20, 445. 00 22. 8 900. 00 0. 0 960._00 0 0 17 10 19 20 6 1% 0 3858 /TENANT REFUSE BILLING 3859 /REFUSE LIEN FEE 3R61 /HA7ARD.0I,R MAT PFRMTT 170. 00 15.0 411. 62- 182.3 7.-000 00 0.0 21 22 23 24 27 26 '° 3862 /ALARM PERMIT FEE 3863 /FALSE ALARM FEE 3661, /NONCONEORMING_RFMODFI S 860. 00 14.0zb 200. 00- 0. 0 '3, 23 23 3867 /PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS 3868 /PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT 3869 /2nd PARTY FFF _00 320.00 50, 000. 00 0 00 0.00 0. 00 62.7fl 27, 363. 99 00 O. 00 0. 00 262__7(1 75, 336. 14 200.-00 0,_o 320. 00 O.O 50, 000. 00 0. 0 262 70- 0.0 29 30 31 32 I OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHFR RFVFNIIF 430, 225. 00 354, 888. 86 17.5 33 3a 35 6 3901 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMII PREY YR 3903 /CfTNTP.TAIITT0NS NON f OVT 8, 000. 00 500. 00 5. f)O(1 nn O. 00 5, 787. 66 0 00 O. 00 5, 906. 51 h32 14 8. 000. 00 O. 0 5, 406. 51- 1181.3 4..._362._86 12 6 37 30 39 O 3904 •._ .. /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS- 3908 /DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION /DEVELOPMENT ■- •N.SFFRS TN 00 40, 000. 00 1.597. 534 n0 - 2, 525. 32 •2, 0. 00 133,12Z-83 141, 440. 81 - - - - , 527. 32 O. 00 X66._255__.66 275, 321. 63 ■ A. 730 41 2, 027. 32- 505.4 40, 000. 00 0. 0 1 231..-278-34 1,- 6 Q2 3 34 35 5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL . ■ ■■■ ■ - 1, 651, 534. 00 ■ - 0 . 1, 376, 212. 37 16.6 9. a4 506 59 1 O 4 2. 48 48 a] 46 a9 50 51 5?. ]% l° 30 0 41 .12 FUND TOTAL 10, 319, 237. 00 468, 366. 24 1, 076, 730. 41 9, 242, 506. 59 10. 4 54 55 56 43 44, 45 ... ... .._ .. .. _ 5.7 50 59 60 :G a 7 46 . 61 62 63 64 I .. ... .. .. ., - 66 67 69 69 70 71 72 565 ]a J J • 41, J J J J ^E IF 2 3 FINANCE—FA484 :—REVENUE TIME 12:35:02 SUMMARY FROM 08/01/90. TO REPORT (BY FUND) 08/31/90 PAGE 0004 DATE 09/19/90 16 07 OF YEAR_COMPLEIE 3 4 5 6 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE UNREALIZED BALANCE % 5 6 ] 6 o 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND DFE$RTMENT 0000 z 2 3100 TAXES 3101 /CURRENT YEAR SFCURED 296, 124. 00 5,000.00 • 301, 124. 00 0. 00 5,918.39 5,918.39 0 00 12, 377.97 12. 377. 97 296.124 00 0 0 13 ° is 16 18 19 20 15 3103 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7,377.97— 288, 746. 03 247.5 4. 1 15 'o 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 74, 525. 00 74,525 00 8,198.26 R 19R 76 10, 377. 86 10.'?77 R,°, 64, 147. 14 14 13.9 1'1 9 6. 0 2f 22 z3 24 26 27 'c8 :925 23 21 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 375, 649. 00 14. 116. 65 22. 755. 83 .i4.j.47 352, 893. 17 23 24 FUND TOTAL 975.6,49 00 14 116, f,5 22.755 R3 352. R9'3 17 6 0 29 30 31 32 33 35 36 2 534 2c 27 .. ... '" 28 29 30 37 38 39 40 3.1 33 43 43 3.1 35 35 • 5 46 4] 48 37 33 30 - ,.. .. .. 49 50 SI 52 40 41 42 53 54 55 56 cJ 44 .:5 - .. .. .. ... ... 57 58 59 60 46 47 45 . G1 62 63 64 49 50 51 .. .. 65 66 67 G8 52 54 69 70 ]1 72 5574 5E q 73 75 • • • • • • I S 2 3 5 6 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 16:59:45 C-LT_Y_OE_HERMOSA_BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION PAGE 0005 DATE 09/17/90 3 IA n9 (7F YEAR__COMPI FTF UNREALIZED 6 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE % 7 5 9 10 12 13 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST DEPARTMFNT 0000 9 14 16 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /IIyIERE$I INCOME 0.00 21 Rh 3407 • /PARKING LOT RENTAL._. 14, 966.00 1,242.00 3409 VEHICLE PKG DIST/LOT B 22, 990.00 ; 1,913.84 3413 VEHICLE PKG DIST/VPD LFASE a 6,_084_00. -S R9.2_81 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3800 CURRFNT FFRVICF CHARGFS 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 104, 040. 00 12, 072. 53 21_86 71 8A- 0 11 2,519.92 12, 446.08 16.8 3,831.68 19, 158.32 16.6 t i .grit 4h 54..152_54 IS 0 18, 304. 92 85, 735. 08 17. 5 3845 /VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY 7,771.00 602.88 776.24 6.994.76 9.9 3846 /VPD LOT PERMITS/MONTHLY ...` 10, 985.00. '... 485.51 , 636.71 10.348. 29 5.7 1147 VFHICI F PKG DIST/VAI TOAT_LON STAMPS ' 72,_.0.0(2 00 -1.500_82 1.930.._99 20.069..01 8 7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40, 756. 00 2, 589. 21 3,343.94 37, 412. 06 8. 2 DFPT DgyO TfTAI S 144. 79A on 14.A/0 74 71...645 R6 123.-147_-14 14 9-- 15 16 19 20 22 23 24 25 e6 2] 28 31 33 34 35 - 36 FUND TOTAL 144, 796. 00 14, 661. 74 21, 648. 86 123. 147. 14 14. 9 32 33 3] 38 30 40 41 43 44 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 4] 48 46 47 - '10 55 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 7 70 11 ]: -5 - 2 2 2 - 2 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 Si 3 51 6 7 8 10 12 13 15 8 9 0 3 5 E E 0 8 0 CITY HERMOSA-BEACH (BY FUND) ., PAGE 0006 DATE 09/17/90 2 3 4 .OF FINANCE -F4494 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT TIME 16:59:45 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 s 6 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE ib 1L OF VEAR-COMPLET— UNREALIZED BALANCE a is 110 PARKING FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 12 ,3 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 330? - /CnURT FINES/PARKTN(1 1 . 981 Ono 00 1,351, 000. 00 150. 470 ii 055. 0R7 a5 _ 1. 095, 4115 18 P 14 15 16 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 9400 USF nF MfNFY R PROPFRTY- 150, 420 11 , ' 255, 082. 85 1,095, 917. 15 18. 8 8 9 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 3407 /PARKING LOT RENTAL 3409 /1 nT R 15, 510. 00 7, 200. 00 1, 841. 68 600. 00 0 00 2, 350. 21 1, 200. 00 0-00 13, 159. 79 15. 1 6, 000. 00 16. 6 0 00 0 0 2 3413 /VPD LEASE OBJECT SUBTOTAL on O. 00 = 22, 710 00 0. 00 2, 441 68 O. 00 3, 550. 21 O. 00 O. 0 19, 159. 79 15. 6 3 4 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3842 /PARKING METERS 'aR4,3 /PARK.INtR PFRriTTS• ANNl1At 700, 000. 00 189 000 00 1, 234. 00 '- • 0 00 ' ,.. `; „ n no -' 0.00 1, 032. 00 Z52_00 720.00 ' 888, 738. 00 86, 410. 98 &21.900 585. 00 : 0. 00 ..: .-:. 0 00 ' '' 187, 142. 49 12.120__00 1, 405. 00 , 25. 00 ::. .. 0 003847 512, 857. 51 26.7 172..880 00- 6 5 171. 00- 113. 8 25. 00- 0. 0 O. 00 0 O 0.00 0. 0 971. 00 5. 9 460 A0 '38 8 3 5 3844 /DAILY PARKING PERMITS 3845 , /VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY '7R4/, " /VPD LOT PERMTTS/MONTHLY 8 s ' /VALIDATION STAMPS 3848 /DRIVEWAY PERMITS 3849 /at1ESIPERMLTS 0.00 27. 50 136_00 360.00 91, 738. 48 `. 0.00' 61. 00 292.._00 2 3850 /CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 820.00 201, 865. 49 100.00- 113.8 686, 872. 51 22. 7 4 4 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR OT JFCT SttRTnTAI 0. 00 n no 2, 262, 448. 00 687. 70 487 70 245, 287. 97 687. 70 687 70 461, 186. 25 687. 70- 0. 0 687_70- 0 0 4 5 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 801, 261. 75 20.3 FtN C TTA) .2 2.62 448._.Dn 249 287.47 461._186_25 14-801-261-75- 5 20-3 , 1 Cr. r. t71 7, 7_ , . le .4 r. 3 51 6 7 8 10 12 13 15 8 9 0 3 5 E E 0 8 0 7 8 9 2 2 z 2 3 3 3 3 37 36 39 40 41 42 43 � ' 44 Y 45 46 4l' 47 M 48 49 51 5 5 54 5 f.� 5 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 i9 70 22 23 24 25 27 78 26 3c 31 32 33 34 36 37 38 39 40 2 :6 :7 15 iL 74 • 4 01, Alb i i 4 i c_r TV 0E_.HERMOSA-BEACH FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT TIME 16:59:45 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 (BY FUND) PAGE 0007 DATE 09/17/90 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 16. 0V -0E—YEAR--COMPLETE_ UNREALIZED BALANCE 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND flFPARTMFNT 000n .. ... . 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 71401 /SNTERES-LINCOMF 14.360_00 19, 360. 00 ,`- 5.354_--38 5,354.38 - 6•-893.29 6,893.29 12.-466,-71 35 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3500 INTERnOVFRNMENTAL/STATE' 12, 466. 71 35.6 3501 /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 3502 /SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 15.03 /SEC-I21C2._5 ALLOCATION 83, 299.00 174, 268.00 4..000.-00— 17, 035. 57 28, 933.33 4.-000 00 17, 035. 57 28, 933.33 4,000-00 66, 263. 43 145, 334.67 20. 4 16.6 3522 /TDA ARTICLE 3 (SB821) OBJECT SUBTOTAL 446, 000 00 . 707, 567 00 0.00 49, 968. 90 0.00 49, 968. 90 0.00 446, 000. 00 657, 598. 10 10(1.0 0.0 7.0 1 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 726, 927. 00 55, 323. 28 56, 862. 19 670, 064. 81 )7.8 FUND TOTAL 726,927.00 -' -55,323.28 56, 862. 19 670, 064. 81 7.8 s. 5 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 i9 70 22 23 24 25 27 78 26 3c 31 32 33 34 36 37 38 39 40 2 :6 :7 15 iL 74 • 4 01, Alb i i 4 i 4-• FINANCE—FA484 TIME 16: 59: 45 3 r CIIY—OR—HERMOSA—BEAC • REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90„,. FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION PAGE 0008 2 DATE 09/17/90 3 AR—OX. UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 5 7 8 9 3 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND .... Li 1.... nFPARTmFNT Onon 10 a 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /TNTFRFST INCOMF L4464' no 17R 4A 210_2Z 1-235 75 19 7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL . • 1,466. 00 •,... -' 178. 46 .; : 230. 25 , 1, 235. 75 15. 7 WEPT 0000 TnTAI S 1 46.6-00 % - ' i 713_4.6 ' 230 25 1...-235 75 15. 7 FUND TOTAL. 230. 25 1.235.75 15.7 18 9 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 29 36 31 32 33 34 37 30 35 40 4i 43 46 47 1.4 40 41 42 43 as 46 47 aa 49 50 51 1,3 ti t 6.: 66 •••••.• 67 52 53 54 10 72 56 u_i_ii_Ut- .121LKNUA_BEACH FINANCE—FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 16:59:45 • •- . . FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0009 DATE 09/17/90 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 16 0%-0E—YEAR—COMRLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE % 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND flFPARTMFNT nnno . . 3100 TAXES -IRK RFC FACTIITY TAX 17.500 00 17,500.00 17:160-00 :, 17,160.00 • 1—,7+160 nO 17,160.00 340-00 98 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL , 342011.SECIEPitONEYIcERCEERIY 340.00 98.0 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 76,129.00 76,129.00 11,052.92 11,052.92 13,987.73 13,987.73 62,141.27 18.3 62,141.27 18.3 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910 ' /PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU , • IIRJFCT RHHT0TAI 130,000.00 13GO0-00 . 17,160.00 • ' 17,t60-00 45,372.92 25,740.00 25,-740-00 56,887.73 104,260.00 19.8 104,-260-00 1.9 a DEPT 0000 TOTALS 223,629.00 166,741.27 25.4 Film-) TrITAI .- . 223: 629_065-372.-9.2 • ., , , ...- . . 56 887 73 • 166.741-27------25.4 . • , •., • . i . , ... 3 6 9 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 37 aa 39 40 #7...„ 41 42 41 45 46 q47 49 51 52 (6, 5 55 3 5 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 i9 10 1 22 23 24 25 25 27 211 25 35 3, 32 33 32 -a 2 4 .116 /' 2 3 ° FINANCE—FA484 TIME 16:59:45 CI--1LOF__.HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 : PAGE 0010 DATE 09/17/90 z 3 5 6 7 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 1-6-O —OF—YEAR—€Ot4PL-E-TE UNREALIZED BALANCE V. 5 6 7 6 9 126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF 000 3100 TAXES 3170 WAY FUND - /UTTLTTv tUSER—IAX 863.-7-66.-00 863, 766. 00 67.887. 34 , : 67. 887. 34 ; ::. ".:' .. - 137,-644,-64 137, 644. 64 12 13 ° 15 6 0 11 13 4 15 OBJECT SUBTOTAL -1.0100—USE-0EMn 726 4.2-1-36 15-9 726, 121. 36 15. 9 7 16 19 62] 7 ,6 3401 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /INTEREST INCOME 40, 077. 00 40, 077. 00 0.00 0. 00 2,493.73 2,493.73 37, 583. 27 6.2 37, 583. 27 6. 2 21 22 19 20 21 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 903, 843. 00 67, 887. 34 ,. 140, 138. 37 763, 704. 63 15. 5 ..1 22 n 24 FUND TOTAL 903, 843.00 67, 887.34 140, 138.37 763, 704.63 15.5 0 31 ]z 25 26 33 35 2 9 29 30 27 30 39 4C 31 32 33 1 4i 22 43 34 35 36 27 37 30 39 . a0 SI 40 41 42 4] 44 46 47 48 <i! 49 50 51 t. 52 53 545 ' 22 71 „ 55. .. } 74 i ; ; r 2 3 56 7 8 11 12 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 r3. 2 3 I33 3 3 r 35 36 r;. 37 30 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 (j 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 7 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 16:59:45 . 3 , c 11[_LIGRIJu23r'Lur Hirf REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0011 DATE 09/17/90 u 07 r1F YFAR_COMPL FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE ETF UNREALIZED BALANCE 127 67. UTILITY USER TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3120 /UTILITY USER TAX 125L65R.00 1, 295, 658.00 101,811 01 ° 101, 831.01 70A.4137 00 206, 467.00 1,089,_1_91 00 15_9 1, 089, 191.00 15.9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6,876.00 6,876.00 168.97 168. 97 226.43 226. 43 6,649.57 3.2 6,649.57 3. 2 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 302, 534. 00 101, 999. 98 206, 693. 43 1.095, 840. 57 15. 8 FUND TOTAL 1, 302, 534. 00 101, 999. 98 206, 693. 43 1, 095. 840. 57 15. 8 • 3 4 0 9 10 11 13 15 16 16 70 2 23 24 C 3 a 6 7 0 3 r9 .4111. mor 2 3 FINANCE-FA/484 . TIME 16:59:45 C.LY F-NERMOSA REVENUE SUMMARY FROM 08/01/90 TO BEACH REPORT (BY FUND) 08/31/90 0012 DATE 09/17/90 1 5 6 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE -6. -0% -0E -YEAR -COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE % 6 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND 9 9 DEPARTMFNT Qf)O0 z 10 t3 11 3700 INTERGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL ° 12 3713 /HOUSING REHABII TTATIfN 105.255 00 0 00 A no 105.255 on 0 15 16 3 3715 /CDBG ADMINISTRATION 11.695.00 0 t] ° 0. 00 0. 00 11, 695.00 0. 0 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 116, 950. 00 0. 00 O. 00 116, 950. 00 0. 0 19 22 6 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 116, 950. 00 0. 00 21 17 0. 00 116, 950. 00 0. 0 22 18 23 24 19 25 20 25 21 FUND TOTAL.. - 116, 950. 00 �." 0. 00 0. 00 116, 950. 00 0. 0 27 .. + .. 20 22 2, 23 30 24 3: 32 25 03 26 " . :. . }" " 34 27 35 20 37 29 36 30 J9 4 31 32 . 42 33 .13 34 35 :6 36 4] 41 3] 38 .. �. 5 39 40 41 42 43 a• 46 92 47 G3 40 64 14. 1 1 ]0 ]i 2 56 • 2 4 5 8 12 1 2 2, 2 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 16:59:45 • ,.,_DEscnLwpnym.ni,n REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 1A 0Y OF YFA: 0013 09/17/90 ■.- FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE UNREALIZED BALANCE 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3117 /PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 190 000 6, 000. 196, 000. 00 00 :. 00 - 2, 959 0. 953. 00- 00 00- 15 66 0. 15, 665. 00 174. 35 00 R a 3121 SUBREGNL INCENTIVE FUNDS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 00 00 6, 000. 00 180, 335. 00 0. 0 7. 9 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 042. 19. 042 00 00 00 00 00 2, 2. 010. 010 '` 0 198. 198. 76 76 00 00 00 2, 534. 2.34 0 412. 412. 23 2q 00 00 00 16, 507. 77 16,_507 77 13. 3 13 .3 0.-0 6. 8 2. 8 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 1E154 /FARES, DIAL A RIDF R, 500 6, 000. 14, 500. 8. 500-00 5, 588. 00 14, 088. 00 3855 /BUS PASSES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 TOTALS 229, 542. 00 744. 24- 18, 611. 23 210, 930. 77 8. 1 FUND TOTAL 229, 542. 00 744. 24- 18, 611. 23 210, 930. 77 8. 1 24 2 I / 2 2 2 r, 2 3 3, 3 33 34 , 35 36 37 0 39 3 44 45 46 r/ 47 t1 48 49 50 51 52 4m 53 54 5 7 6 8 9 :0 12 13 14 15 16 7 16 '5 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 20 30 3, 02 33 34 30 30 :5 15 70 71 72 !3 J -1111. 2 3 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 16:59:45 CITY 0EHERMDSA_BEAC I REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90. 5 6 7 9 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE PAGE 0014 DATE 09/17/90 3 16 01 flF YEAR COMPIFTF UNREALIZED BALANCE 6 150 GRANT FUND DFPARTMFNT 0000 10 14 15 16 17 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3517 /OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFET OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 40, 500 00 40, 500. 00 • T0TAI S 40 S00 On O 00 0. 00 O 00 O 00 0. 00 n no 40_500 00 40, 500. 00 40 500 00 n 0. 0 0 0 2 13 14 16 7 18 2 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 FUND TOTAL. 402500. 00 , 0. 00 0. 00 402500. 00 0. 0 25 26 27 22 23 24 39 31 25 26 27 34 36 28 29 30 37 38 39 40 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 42 a 4-4 46 a7 4A 411. 5C 51 40 42 54 43 44 45 46 47 48 7 33 11,11 64 c4 49 50 51 52 54� 55 56 tl. r? !j ri r;„, (. FINANCE-FA484 TIME 16:59:45 .. ... 6 V) 1 v 11t HLEMOSA_UEAGH REVENUE SUMMARY FROM 08/01/90 .TO REPORT (BY FUND). 08/31/90 .. - ' ... PAGE DATE ' I A 0015 09/17/90 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 117 OF YFAR COMPI FTF UNREALIZED BALANCE 155 CROSSING GUARD. FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3141 /CURRFNT YFAR SECURED /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS "15,782_00 5.000.00 70, 287.00 0 00 1,326.41 ' 1,326.41 . . 0 00 2,829.54 2,829.54 /15,._287_00 2,170.46 67, 457.46 0 0 56.5 4.0 3103 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 nfJFC.r SURTfTAI /INTEREST INCOME TOTALS 2,021.00 2.021 00 72,308.00: 366.76 366_2/,468_87 1, 693. 17 468.87 1, 552. 13 1.5 52 1323 23.1 1 DEPT 0000 3,298.41 .— 69, 009. 59 4. 5 FONT) TOTAL 72 'I0R 00 1.69-1_17 2.298_41 A9.,_609 -59A_ 5 .1. • 9 2C 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 34 35 3 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 4 4 49 A 5, 52 6.150 54 55 irl5 '7 8 9 30, 2 3 c 0 3 0 0 2 C-• tft 411.3 .113 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 31 3 3 3 3 3 3 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 46 49 50 51 52 53 54 6 o 4 5 6 6 FINANCE-FA484 rITV 0E ERMOSA_BEArw REVENUE SUMMARY :TIME .16:59:43 FROM OB/01/90 TO REPORT (BY FUND) 08/31/90 PAGE 0016 DATE 09/17/90 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 1-6-0%-OF-YEAR-COMPL-E�E- UNR EAL I ZED BALANCE 160 SEWER FUND nEPARTMENT I].Qnn z 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY '1401 /TNTFREST TNCnMF - 76 597 00 76, 597. 00 :. ., 11.263 A6 11, 263. 66 14.473_60 ' 14, 473. 60 62.-123,-40 OBJECT SUBTOTAL '1600 INTFRCDUFRNMFNTAI /rntolTY - 18.8 62, 123. 40 16.8 - 3602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4.000.00 4,000.00 1,038.57 1.038.57 1,038.57 1,038.57 2,961.43 25.9 2,961.43 25.9 ' 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES- 3828 /SEWER CONNECTION FEE .829 /SEWER -DEMO[ T .ON -EEE 18, 000. 00 L.-300-00 ' 1, 647. 64 30-00 1, 992. 18 16, 007. 82 11.0 3832 /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,000.00 20, 300. 00 100.00 1,777.64 75. 00 100.00 2, 167. 18 1,-225-00 ,5. 7 900.00 10.0 18, 132. 82 10. 6 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN nB 1FrT SUBTOTAL .. 800,000.00- .. 800•.-000,-00 900, 897.00 7' .- 66, 666. 67 ; 66.-666r67 .. 80.746.54. 133, 333. 34 ' "':33,-333-34 151, 012.69 . 666, 666. 66 16. 6 666-.-666-66 1-6,...,6-- -6-6DEPT 749, 884.31 16.7 DEPT0000 TOTALS FUND_T_OTAI q0 • -- • • - • • 2.69 749. 884-3-1-4-6,-7---:, • - _ .. Via• - • • • 3 5 6 9 0 4 0 3 9 3 , 0 3 3 r9- 0 3 4 7 89 1 2 2 2 2 32 3' ro 32 33 re 34 35 36 37 38 35 40 42 43 4445 4 49 50 52 53 54 55 56 FINANCE-FA484 • . TIME 16:59:45 ...., .. - ',,, L-LI_L_Iit__HtliMUSA_BFACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) - -FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 '. • ,'• PAGE DATE 09/17/90 IA (17 0017 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE nr VF4P rnmpLFTE UNREALIZED BALANCE 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND DEPARTMFNT 0000 ' 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3304 /FORFEITED FU 0 141. 1. 312, 000. 00 - -.-",:•.- 9n• 934_66 221.-065_34 29 221, 065. 34 29. 1 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USF OF MONEY ? PROPFRTY 90, 934. 66 „... 90, 934. 66 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 003. 00 7, 003. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 003. 00 0. 7, 003. 00 0. 0 0 DEPT 0000 TOTALS . . • 319, 003. 00 . . . .. ..... . :•• : .90, 934. 66 • . . , 90, 934. 66 228, 068. 34. 28. 5 FUND TOTAL 319, 003. 00 90, 934. 66 90, 934. 66 228, 068. 34 28. 5 : • • - - - - • • • • • - . • • . . ... .. , ,. •• 3 4 5 9 10 12 :45 16 tC. 20 21 2223.24 6 0 33 34 37 3:. 46 3 6 :7 3 fes] 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 FINANCE-FA484 'TIME 16:59:45 GI-T'Y-OR--HERMO8A BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 ,., FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE PAGE 0018 DATE 09/17/90 1-6:-0%- F-YEAR-CQMPLCTE UNREALIZED BALANCE 2 3 4 5 10 12 13 14 15 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND DF ---0000 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 34n1 ,LLNTFRFaT INCOME 16.-699300 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHFR REVENUF 16, 693. 00 1. 695, 09 1, 695. 09 2.131.96 14, 56-1x 04 12. 7 2,131.96 14, 561.04 12.7 3912 /FIRE FLOW FEE 100, 000.00 22, 179.24 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 100, 000. 00 22, 179. 24 30, 455. 24 30, 455. 24 69, 544. 76 69, 544. 76 30. 4 30. 4 DEPT 0000 . TOTALS 116, 693. 00 23, 874. 33 32, 587. 20 84, 105. 80 27. 9 FUND TOTAL 116, 693. 00 23, 874. 33 32, 587. 20 84, 105. 80 27. 9 16 2 13 14 iS 16 17 18 5 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 27 28 20 30 31 32 33 34 35 3G 31 2 3 34 36 37 43 41 42 43 44 45 .10 37 30 39 40 42 43 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 64 55 56 61 C_ 63 7C 71 72 74 Il • i u—(I C ' ,u,uon_I3Emun FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0019 TIME 12:35:02 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 DATE 09/19/90 \\ z) 3 6 ] B 16 07 OF YFAR COMPLETE—.4_. UNREALIZED FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. 0 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND DEPARTMENT Afnfl' 9 0 12 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST NCO F 0_00 1.733_69 13 15 6 1 733_69 1,733.60- 0 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 1,733.69 1,733.69 1,733.69- 0. 0 REVENE 'a90O f1THFR• U ,o t9 20 3955 /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 4, 016, 032. 00 724, 765. 08 1, 023, 971. 16 2, 992. 060. 94 25. 4 17 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 016, 032. 00 724, 765. 08 1. 023, 971. 16 2, 992, 060. 84 25. 4 :5 21 2.2 23 24 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 4, 016, 032.00 726, 498.77 1, 025, 704.85 2, 990, 327.15 25. 5 20 . 1 6 26 27 29 22 J FUND TOTAL 4, 016, 032. 00 726, 498. 77 1, 025, 704. 85 2, 990, 327. 15 25. 5 24 29 30 31 32 29 27 33 34 35 36 `8 29 30 37 38 39 40 • 32 31 42 43 44 34 3; 35 46 4] 49 3] 38 39 49 50 5, 52 40 53 54 55 56 .33 44 4560 56 59 45 a] 473 61 62 63 64 49 SO 51 u 66 67 08 52 53 54 69 70 )1 ]2 ]4 757y • • 0 0 • / 1 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 12:35:02 C11-Y-OF---14ER140SA--BEACH ;' , • REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT • (BY FUND) ... FROM 08/01/90 - TO 08/31/90 6 7 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV PAGE 0020 DATE 09/19/90 YE R UNREALIZED MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. 3 • 5 6 7 705 INSURANCE FUND 12 13 14. 15 15 17 19 20 21 .113 23 24 3900 OTHER REVENUE 74955 11PERATINn TRANSFERS IN 797.279.00 3957 /TRANSFER IN -DEPT INS SVS. 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL H 797,279.00 00 • 66, 440. 00 • 66, 440. 00 0. 00 132, 880. 00 132, 880. 00 797,-279. 00 132, 880. 00- 664, 399. 00 0. 0 0. 0 16. 6 DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL . REPORT TOTALS TOTALS 797, 279. 00 66, 440. 00 132, 880. 00 797, 279. 00 1 66, 440. 00 22, 869. 733. 00 132, 880. 00 2, 002, 637. 81 3. 498, 162. 36 664, 399. 00 16. 6 664, 399. 00 16. 6 19, 371, 570. 64 15. 2 27 119 29 30 31 72 33 109 11 2 13 la 15 16 7 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 29 30 31 32 33 35 36 37 30 39 40 42 43 3.1 35 36 37 30 39 45 46 47 48 . ' • 40 42 43 4.. 41 50 51 52 5_1 54 55 .40 56 50 50 50 n6 , 47 48 6i 62 63 64 .13 50 5 65 56 67 60 52 53 54 ., 56 • 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 -I 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 1 I I 12 13 4 16 17 15 11 20 21 27 2 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 36 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 40 49 _50 51 52 , 53 54 55 56 FINANCE -F4454 TIME 11: 13: 09 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0001 DATE 09/17/90 1.6 OV OF YEAR_COMPLETE--- FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 'A 001 GENERAL FUND 1101 C 'ITV rfnastcaj DEPT • , i Fniqi AT TVF ' . • -. 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 23, 216. 00 1, 950. 10 3, 778. 14 0. 00 19, 437. 86 16. 2 • • • AT_IONLS_LC.K__P_AY_OFF 464_00 0 On CI 00 0 00 464_00 n 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 464.00 0.00 122.06 0.00 341.94 26.3 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 18, 000. 00 1, 500. 00 3. 000. 00 0. 00 15, 000. 00 16. 6 s c 1F0T St IRT0Ipj 4P. 144 00 -4, 450_1_0 6.9Q0 20 0_00 '15.-243 80-16 3 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - • ONIRACT qER - - - = • ss •_00 0. 00 0 no 8,-250-00 0 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8, 250. 00 0. 0 8, 250. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 30041ATERLA1 sISUPP_LIESLOTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 280.00 25.08 33. 30 0. 00 246. 70 11.8 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 11, 000. 00 319. 59 664. 31 1, 515. 85 8, 819. 84 19. 8 • 31-5_11FMBERSHIP ,c, -2.5a_00 200-00 2.-864 00 0 00 3.-386. 00 45-8 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 2, 750. 00 2, 750. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 500.00 74.03-, 74.03 0.00 425.97 14.8 • -6_IRSFR nur- T MS UCER__CHGS q.05-5-00 255-00 10.-00 0,-0o- 2,-545-00 16. OBJECT SUBTOTAL n4n0 FOUTPMENT 18, 173. 51 23. 7 23, 835. 00 873. 70 4, 145. 64 1, 515. 85 5401 EGUIPMENT-LESS THAN $500 351 00 0. 00 . 0. 00 0. 00 351. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL " ' 351_ 00 0. 00 - 0. 00 0. 00 351. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 74, 580. 00 4, 323. 80 11. 045. 84 1, 515. 85 62, 018. 31 16. 8 1121 CITY CLERK DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 41..00 PPRSONAL_SER_V-LCES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 32, 807. 00 136. 80 542. 69 0. 00 32, 264. 31 1. 6 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 656. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 656. 00 0. 0 4111 ACCRUAl CASH_LN 656_00 0 00 000 0 00 656_00 0 0 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 18, 959 00 3, 165. 25 6, 259. 5800 0 " . 12, 699. 42 33. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 53, 078 00 , 3, 302. 05 6, 802. 27 0. 00 46, 275. 73 12. 8 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE .20, 330. 00 128.98 128. 98 0. 00 20, 201. 02 0.6 0BJECISURIOTAL • • s. = -= = -= • SO 21:6.201 na n 1. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TP.LEeHOMF Ap9, no 78_92 107 as (L00 522_71.______1 A 3 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 2, 100. 00 142. 46 420. 47 0. 00 1, 679. 53 20. 0 4315 MEMBERSHIP 270.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 270.00 0.0 , . } 2 3 6 0 9 10 i3 16 17 18 20 21 2322 25 2261 20 29 30 3, 32 33 34 35 36 37 30 39 40 42 43 45 47 40 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 50 61 62 63 65 67 69 7701 72 /3 74 4) 4) 4)1 5 7 11 11 12 14 15 is 21 I2: 12 In 2 z 3 31 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 ° ° 9 ° 2 4 ' 6 ' ° A4 - a ,-yr.-ncn r,uJn-ucna.n EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0002 DATE 09/17/90 16 0%-OF--YEAR-COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 112L -CITY CLERK DEPT: LEG-ISLATI-VE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4316 TRA TN 1.03-1 nn n On 0 on 0_0n 1. 033.-00 0 0 .NA 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600.00 0.0 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 9,700.00 983.20 983.20 0.00 8,716.80 10.1 4396-TRSER OUS=INS__USER_CHGR 0.-270-00 189-_00 378_00 0.00 1.892.00 16.6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16, 598.00 1,393.48 1,883.96 0.00 14, 714.04 11.3 "nn FnUIRMFNT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 800.00 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 800.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 800. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 90, 806.00 4,824.51 8,815.21 0.00 81, 990.79 9.7 1122 ELECTIONS DEPT: LEGISLATIVE ' 300-MAIERI-ALSLSt IP PL T ESZOTHEP 4304 TELEPHONE 100. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 100. 00 0. 0 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.0 4116 TRATNTNG 1.167_00 n.00 0.500 0 00 1,167-00 0.0 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 600.00 0.0 600. 00 . 0.00 =' '0.00-• 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,067.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,067.00 0.0 DIVISION TOTAL 2,067.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,067.00 0.0 1131 CITY ATTORNEY DEPT: LEGISLATIVE . 4200_CONIRACT SERV-LCES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 115, 000.00 5,778.00 5,778.00 0.00 109, 222.00 5.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 115, 000. 00 5,778.00 5,778.00 0. 00 109, 222. 00 5. 0 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 185. 00 44. 89 56. 62 0. 00 128. 38 30. 6 ES ' 310-00 2-40 2x-40 0. 00 307.-60 0. 7 4305-0FF-I-CE-OPER-SURRL- 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 495. 00 47.29 435.98 11.9 59. 02 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL 115, 495. 00 5,825.29 5,837.02 0.00 109, 657. 98 5.0 DEPT: LEGISLAT-I-VE 11'tv CITY PROSECUTOR 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 25...440.._00 2.-120.00 4.240 00 0.00 21.200.00 16. 6 2 3 5 6 0 9 10 12 '3 14 15 16 17 16 19 z0 21 22 23 4 z5 26 z7 20 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 30 39 40 1 42 43 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 02 53 54 55 56 57 50 59 60 61 62 63 G4 65 56 67 G0 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 1 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 %.-.4J-7-UC-1'/GKVIU'A-li L.AC.YI EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0003 DATE 09/17/90 16 07 OF YEAR ,, z 3 4 -COMPLETE s 6 FUND DIV OBUT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. ] e 001 GENERAL FUND : 9 :1 1192 rITY PROSECUTOR DEPT: LEGSSLAI-LVE 12 :o ,3 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES i5 '2 nRJFCT SURT1TA3 25. 440 00 2. 120-00 4..-240-.00 0.00 21-.-200.-00 16.6 15 1] 16 ' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 19 4201 CONTRACZSERV.ICF/PRIVATE '93,-000_.00 9.585..00 2.-585x00 0.-00 30,-415-00 20 :6 1] OBJECT SUBTOTAL :33, 000. 00 2, 5135. 00 2, 585. 00 O. 00 7.8 30, 415. 00 7. 8 zl zz 23 8 430. 1.- - • -- • 24 "' 4304 TELEPHONE 185. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' 25 'D 185.00 0.0 26 22 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 864. 00 72.00 144. 00 0. 00 720. 00 16. 6 27 nB.JECT SUBTOTAL 1.04'7.-00 72.-00 144-00 0.-00 905.--00 13. 7 29 29 30 31 24 n T V T SIGN TOTAI 59.,_4B9_00______4.,_..7_7_7_.-00 A, 9-65-00 0. 00 52.-520-00 25 1-1. 732 33 34 2] 1141 CITY TREASURER DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 35 36 20 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 3] 29 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 28, 775. 00 1, 123. 50 2, 247. 00 0. 00 26, 528. 00 7. 8 3e 39 30 4106_REGUI AR OVERTIME 500.-00 n oo ?04,-12 0-00 88 40 "' 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 288.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -295, 40,-8 288.00 0.0 42 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 288..00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 288. 00 0. 0 43 31 4112 -PART -TIME/ -TEMPORARY 14.-9-7-9-00 -1.-179 50 2.-359.-00 0.-00 12.-620.-00 44 3" 35 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 44, 830. 00 2. 303. 00 4, 810. 12 0. 00 15. 7 40, 019. 88 10. 7 46 4] 35 4200 rnNTRArT SFRVTCFS 48 3] 49 3e 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 2, 000. 00 48. 76 48. 76 0. 00 1, 951. 24 2. 4 so OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 000. 00 48. 76 48. 76 0. 00 1, 951. 24 2. 4 51 39 52 40 41 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER s6 42 4304 TELEPHONE t SIMPI iFS 4309 OFF- F nPFR 785. 00 • 89. 22 1. 47_0_00____________128_59 106.83 a7q '34 0.00 IL X30 678. 17 13.6 1- 1'90 66 0 55 56 43 4315 MEMBERSHIP 185. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 19 185. 00 0.0 se 44 4316 TRAINING- - 250. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 250. 00 0. 0 59 A5 43L7_CONFERENCE-EXPENSE 500._-00 0 00 0 00 0 00 500-00 0 0 60 46 GI 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 1, 608. 00 134. 00 268. 00 0. 00 1, 340. 00 16. 6 62 47 OBJECT SUBTOTAL • 4, 798. 00 351. 77 654. 17 0. 00 4, 143. 83 13. 6 63 nn 64 a9 65 6 SO DIVISION TOTAL 51, 628. 00 2. 703. 53 . ' 5. 513. 05 0. 00 46, 114. 95 10. 6 67 51 66 52 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 394, 065. 00 22, 454. 13 38, 180. 12 1, 515. 85 354, 369. 03 10. 0 ,o 53 n 54 • r: • :GFR 0FPT• MINT /St 1PP0RT 72 55 !3 56 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ]4 ]s ' 41 f2_REGU AR SALARIESLhtlSC l n0. 81/ 00 R, 2n7_, PC) 16.29.3 99 n 00 R ,.S22<OR ' 1,4 1 74' 2 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 17 12 CrIv OE__HERMDSA-BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1201 CITY MANAGER DEPT: GMT-.UPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4110 VACATION/RICK EAY_OFF 9 30 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 'IB,JFCT SUBTOTAI 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES . • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 300-MATER2ALS4SURPLSES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE la lJ PAGE 0004 DATE 09/17/90 3/0 -16,-.0.4-0E-YEAR-COMPLETE---4- .40 s ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 1.966.,.._0n 0 00 1, 966. 00 0. 00 3, 640. 00 0. 00 IA8.388.-On-----`-'-207 90 100 -.On 300. 00 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 615.00 69.55 310 -MOTOR FUELS_AND-LUBES 1 00 190. - 250.00 14, 65 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 135.20 4315 MEMBERSHIP 135.00 0.00 316-TRA.IN.ING 700.00 0.00 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 3,700.00 0-00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 5, 27. 00 6. 00 •BJEr�T_SUB.OTAL 5, 2 227. 00 436. 00 1;3,747,00 61 -40 O. 00 121. 88 ' 127. 16 16,342-96 0 00 1..-966.-00 0 0 0. 00 1, 844. 12 6. 1 0. 00 3, 512. 84 3. 4 0_00 91-.. 845.- 04 15,-2 77 �a �9T24 0,-00 • 0.00 , 77.74 89.24 •33 3, 35 35 7 V4S-ION TOTAL 1-22, 435-(30 8,896.04 1202 FINANCE ADMIN 38 9 10 12 13 15 6 9 9 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1406 -REGULAR -OVERTIME 4209,154.00' 16, 282.55 4, 1. 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF , 55 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 183-00 4883. 00 O. 00 4112 PARTT-rl.t�E,c Ef4gQRARY 4,183.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL COQ 00 00 222, 620. 00 16, 7200 . 06 42 OO -CON TR AC -T -SER V4C E 0 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 210-76 29. 7 210.76 29.7 6 J 7 ,.' 6 9 10 11 140 12 13 14 15 IJ 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 89. 50 176. 95 23-52 0.00 563. 25 0. 00 525. 50 14. 5 0.00 1,473.05 10. 7 8. 00 196:-48 10.6 0.00 135.00 0. 0 0.00 136.75 80.4 0,-00 0,-00 3,-500-00 0.09 O.O 872. 00 0. 00 1,700.00 0. 0 0.00 4,355.00 16. 6 1 7s-rc vz2 21 78 12. 18.-357. 12 0.00 1-04,-07-7-50 14. 9 25 26 27 28 • 29 30 31 32 35 36 37 38 9 40 .1 n 41 42 43 -, 44 32, 862. 21 694--67 0.00 136. 10 1-43=55 33, 833. 53 0. 00 176, 291. 79 15. 7 O. -0O 2,-908-23 19-2 0. 00 4, 183. 00 0. 0 0. 00 4, 046. 90 3. 2 0.00 1,-356,45 9-5 0. 00 188, 786. 47 15. 1 45 46 47 .4 48 40 50 51 J 52, 54 55 56, 57 58 66, 095. 00 66, 095. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER •. 4304 TELEPHONE'2,646.00 4305 -OFFICE -OPER -SUPPLIES .IES 9-.-700-00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 250.00 4316 TRAINING 3,652 00 1,396.42 1,396.42 5,461.42 5,461.42 350. 00 350. 00 60, 283. 58 60. 283. 58 B.7 B. 7 256. 02 331. 13 '0.00 910. 82 1. 331. �7 2,314.87 12. 5 0. 00 7 S6"�"_-°8,40239 1Y. 4_ 100.00 0. 00 150.00 40.0 21.40 147. 40 0. 00 3,504.60 4. 0 59 .4 60 61 62 664 65 it C IY-OE-HERMOSA_..BEACH ' FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND). PAGE 0005 TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 DATE 09/17/90 1 3 16 07 OF -YEAR -COMPLETE ' 6 FUND DIV ODJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % s 7 q 001 GENERAL FUND 1202 E NANCE AD)NIN ° to r1FPT MGMT/ai1P ORT 12 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER CONEERENr FX-EhRF Iz 13 14 s non_0n o-oo O^00 0 00 16317 1., 15 1.. 800. 00 0 0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 8,639.00 720. 00 1, 440. 00 O. 00 7, 199. 00 16.6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25, 687. 00 1, 908. 24 3, 678. 30 37. 36 21, 971. 34 14.4 1' 19 iB399. 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 796.00 396.05 396.05 0.0022 95 49.7 OR.IFCT Rl1RTnTA1 79,4 nn 39A n9 20 23 ° 39.605 0.-00 399-9-5------49.7 24 20 21 " D I V T S T ON LOTA1 2s 26 27 1154_19.8_011 204-420 77 43.-369-30 382.36 23 2 4 25 271,-441-34 13 re 1203 PERSONNEL DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT J9 29 3° 31 _6 27 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 59, 552. 00 4, 019. 68 7, 601. 30 0. 00 51, 950. 70 12. 7 4110 VACATInN/S1CK PAY nFF 1.191 nn 0 00 32 33 334 5 �0 0 On OrOn 1,--19 L. -0O 0 0 4111 ACCRUAL 36 20 J0 CASH IN 1, 191. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 191. 00 0. 0 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 3, 640. 00 0. 00 127. 16 0. 00 3, 512. 84 3. 4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL A. 574 n0 0 3' 39 31 • 4 19 4 P 7. 72R 46 0 00 57. 845._-54 11. `o 32 33 7 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES .. ...: .. 420LCONIRACI_SER_VSCELERIVATF 11-600_00 41 43 ' 3•' 1.732-01 1,.232-03 ' 104.28 11.-763 b9 +3.-5 4251 CONTRACT `° 3s 35 SERVICE/GOVT 9, 875. 00 O. 00 375. 00 0. 00 9, 500. 00 3. 7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 23, 475. 00 1, 732. 03 2, 107. 03 104. 28 21, 263. 69 9. 4 4s 46 47 ° 39 3i 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE -963. 00 153. 00 182. 34 O. 00 780. 66 18.9 4305 OFFIrE_OPFR Stipp' TFq 4. 200^00 435_22 702_02 178._P 49 49 sso, 52 °2 4 114 75 20 4315 MEMBERSHIP 650.00 30.00 380.00 0.00 270.00 58. 4 4316 TRAINING 3, 200. 00 O. 00 75. 00- O. 00 3, 275. 00 2. 3 4317 Cf)NFERFNcF EXPENSE 415 nn 0 On own n 00 53 s4 ss ` s6 43 44 °' 915_00 0 0 4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 15, 500. 00 662. 00 - 662. 00 0. 00 14, 838. 00 4. 2 4327 AQMD INCENTIVES 0. 00 0. 00 3, 200. 00- 0. 00 3, 200. 00 0. 0s9 4396-IRSER_OUS-INS-USER CliGq 2...122_.00 181_00 5' se ' 46 162_ 000 00 L. 810 00 t6_ 6 60 4 2 48 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 28, 600. 00 1, 461. 22 986. 64- 378. 23 29, 208. 41 2. 1 6, 62 63 49 so 5 DIVISION TOTAL 117, 649. 00 7, 212. 93 8, 848. 85 482. 51 108, 317. 64 7. 9 1204 CABLE TV FPT• MGMT/Sl1PPnRT r) 64 65 66 67 69 52 i3 54 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 RF(:UI AR SAI ARIFR/MTRC 7A. nnn nn 1.474 2n 7.7A.9 Pn 0 00 2't 230 6° 'o( 1 72 ss 57, `7 20 10 6 I ,6 ,5. 4 0 4 9 0 0 a e 9 10 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1205 CARLP TV 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 C -ITV -OR- HERMOSA-BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. DEPT: - MCMT LSLIg.nR-T PAGE 0006 • DATE 09/17/90 1-6-07.-OF-Y€ARSOMI''LETC ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 10 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 411D_/ACAIION/SI .CK_P.AY-DEF 520._ 00 520. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 0.00 0,-00 0,-00 520-00 0:-0 J 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 nBEAT-AL gg�4O�p 0. 00 1 2, 425. 25 10. 1 AL 2, 700. 00 129. 50 274. 75 525. 00 0. 1- 608,-70 '1.-044,5-5 0,00 26.695-45 10. 2 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201-C ON TR ACT-SERVICE/P-R-I-VA-TE 5,-000,-00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 4300-MATER-IALS/-SUP-PL IES/OTHER 25 26 27 28 29 30 33 34 35 37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 51000.-00 0-0 5, 000. 00 0. 0 14 `0 tl 22 23 2,1 45 26 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 700.00 -a 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 35.66 40.94 0.00 659. 06 5.8 �, /1315 -MEMBERSHIP 1, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 1, 000. 00 O. 0 31 4316 TRAINING 400.-00 60. 00 GO. 00 0. 00 340:-00 15.0 ' 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 350. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 350. 00 0. 031 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ''1 4396-TRSFR OUT -INS USER-CHGS 1-,-07$-00 0. 00 500. 00 O.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 90-00 180-00 0.00 098.00 16-6 4. 028. 00 185. 66 280. 94 O. 00 3, 747. 06 6. 9 ;, DIVISION TOTAL 120A DATA PROrESS INC: DEaT.'''.. MCI TLSUPPOPT 38, 768. 00 1. 794. 36 . 38 39 40 41 42 a an •:6 47 40 49 50 52 53 54 s•, S56 3, 325. 49 0. 00 35. 442. 51 8. 5 .11 42 13 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102-REGUL6R_SALARIES/Mrs,- 88�364_On 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME S q61_62 10 722._.1.R 0. 00 7q.-241,-82------42,0 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.0 1, 779.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,779.00 0.0 a 111-ACGBUAL-CASH IN 1.779_00 0._00 1._222._20 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 93, 022. 00 5,961.62 11, 944. 38 0. 00 556.-80 68.7 ' O. 00 81, 077. 62 12.8 4200_ CONTR AC'LSERI/_ICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 2, 568. 00 352. 75 539. 31 4305_DEEICE-OPER-SUPRLSES 0. 00 2, 028. 69 21. 0 i 1. 348 DO 535_23 590 50 1.-059 �p 9, 698. 20 14 5 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2, 200. 00 O. 00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 0. 00 0. 00 2, 200. 00 0. 0 830.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 830. 00 O. 0 437 ZCONFERENCF FXP_ENSF 1 . 350_.00 O_An 0__00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 2.926. 00 244.00 0.00 1.-350..00_ 0 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 488. 00 00 2, 438. 00 16. 6 21. 222. 00 1. 131. 98 1 1, 617. 81 1, 059. 30 18. 544. 89 12. 6 It 93, 520. 00 93, 520. 00 8. 203. 33 8, 203. 33 16, 055. 30 16, 055. 30 0. 00 0. 00 77, 464. 70 77, 464. 70 17. 1 17. 1 ..0 1 2 3 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 L' , r .lr-n=mmuaf u i..c EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0007 DATE 09/17/90 16 07 OF YEAR-COMP1 FTE N. 2 3 ° 4 5 6 FUND DIV ODJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE '/. 5 6 67 6 9 001 GENERAL FUND DEPT MGMT/SUPPORT 0 O(1 A n0 n n0 0. 00 95...000 00 0, 0 9 '0 ,3 14 6 !, 12 I206_DATB_P1taCFSSINr 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQU.IENENT-MORE THAN $500 95,-400 00 95, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 95, 000. 00 0. 0 16 20 13 w 15 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 16 17 0 DIVISION TOTAL TIFPT• 302, 764. 00 MGMT/SUEEDB.I 79. 97-9--00 " 500.00 1,600.00 1./00 O0 83, 679. 00 .: 29.00 160.00 c' ..•• 15, 296. 93 ' " A. 256 97 0.00 0.00 0 00 6,256.97 19.78 0.00 79,-53 29, 617. 49 12, 455-63 0.00 0.00 0-00 12. 455. 63 _ 19.78 0.00 1, 059. 30 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0„_00 272, 087. 21 10. 1 67.-523. 37 15. 5 n 22 23 24 z5 26 27 28 , 20 2, 1207 BUS LICENSE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES' RFGIJJ AR SALARIES /MTs-. 500.00 0.0 1,600.00 0.0 1. 600,-00 0. 0 29 30 31 32 zz 23 24 4107 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF ACCRUAL CASH TN . 71, 223. 37 14.8' 9.22 68.2 160.00 O.0 i69,.-22-------1-0--4 272-01 27-1 33 34 35 6 37 39 0 441 42 44 25 26 27 4111 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20 29 30 4200--CONTRACT-SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OR.IFCT S1113Tf1TAl 102.-99 0. 00 32 33 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER.'3 4104_2ELEPH0NE 379'. 00 45 34 35 36 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4, 380. 00 286. 00 105_0.0 50. 00 850. 00 n 70o _0o 4, 520. 00 11, 266. 00 299. 81 36.88- 4._00 40. 00 0. 00 . 529. 11 27. 30 4_00 . 40.00 0. 00 o. oo 0. 00 0.00 1100 0. 00 99. 00 n�oo 3, 850. 89 12.0 258. 70 9. 5 101_-00 3.--8 10. 00 80.0 751. 00 11.6 700. 00 0.-0 46 47 48 50 51 52 31 38 4'311 A(/TO_MATNTFNANCF 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 9 40 41 4.117 rONEERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL n.--Qo 377. 00 763. 45 754. 00 1, 457. 40 0. 00 99. 00 3, 766. 00 16.6 9, 709. 60 13.8 53 54 55 56 5] 42 43 A4 . DIVISION TOTAL ' 95. 134. 00 7, 040. 20 13, 932. 81 99. 00 81, 102. 19 14. 7 50 60 61 As '' 47 48 1208 GEN APPROP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 62 63 64 410.0 PERSONAL SFRUTCES!i5 26, 312. 00 526. 00 2, 038. 00 0. 00 0_00 4, 076. 00 0. 00 0 00a. 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 0. 00 22. 236. 00 15.4 526. 00 O. 0 526 00 0 0 u6 67 ,.oACCRUAL-CASH-IN 49 60 5, 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF . 23, 288. 00 14. 8 70 411..1- 526.00 52 53 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 27, 364. 00 2, 038. 00 4, 076. 00 72 54 55 5fi ]4 5 6 CITY OF-HERMOSA--BEAC-4 FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0008 TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 DATE 09/17/90 16-0%--0F-NEAR-COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7 001 GENERAL FUND 10 12 is 15 1?08-GEN-APPRnP DEPT: MGMTISUP-PORT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTR C.. SERV -L E/PRTVATF 1.5-6oQ..0n 1. 195.-43 1-.-733.-80 0.00 13.-866-20 1-1-1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15, 600. 00 1, 155. 43 1, 733. 80 O. 00 13, 866. 20 11. 1 18 ID 20 21 22 23 24 4300_MATERIALSLSUPPLTESLOIHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 431A TRATNTNC` 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 268. 00 300. 00 00 00 1, 152. 00 1, 920. 00 38. 22 1, 552. 65- 0 00 96. 00 1,418.43- 49. 95 ,418.43- 49.95 0. 00 218. 05 18. 6 8, 338. 08- 0. 00 . 8, 638. 08 2779. 3 0. 00 0-.00 200-00 0-0 192.00 0.00 960.00 16.6 8, 096. 13- 0. 00 10, 016.13 421. 6 26 27 29 29 30 31 32 33 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1402_EQMPMFNT-MnRF THAN 29nn OBJECT SUBTOTAL 100. 00 i. ann nn 0. 00 0 00 5. 300. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.0 0 on (1. 00 5.-200.-00 0 0.00 0.00 5.300.00 O. 0 690.0_LEASE_PAYMEN.TS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 22, 970. 00 22, 970. 00 1,506.48 1,506.48 3, 012. 96 3, 012. 96 0. 00 0. 00 19, 957. 04 19, 957. 04 13. 1 13. 1 DIVISION TOTAL 73; 154. 00 3,281.48 726. 63 . 0. 00 72, 427. 37 0. 9 34 35 1212 EMP BENEFITS DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 3, 30 39 40 41 4100 PFRS0NAI SFRVi(FS 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 670, 458. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 670,458.00 50, 248. 11 50, 248. 11 104, 004. 42 104, 004. 42 0. 00 0. 00 566, 453. 58 566. 453. 58 15. 5 15. 5 J DIVISION TOTAL 670, 458. 00 50, 248. 11 104, 004. 42 0. 00 566, 453. 58 15. 5 42 43 45 1213 RETIREMENT _ DEPT:. MGMT/SUPPORT 46 47 410Q_EERSONAI GFRVICES 4180 RETIREMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 858, 463. 00 858, 463. 00 70, 115. 51 70, 115. 51 70, 115. 51 70, 115. 51 0.00 788.347.49 0. 00 788, 347. 49 8. 1 8. 1 48 49 50 DIVISION TOTAL 858, 463. 00 70, 115. 51 70, 115. 51 f 0. 00 788, 347. 49 8. 1 52 53 54 1214 PROSP EXP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 55 56 4. 4300 MATFRTAt S/SUPPLTFR/OTHER 4322 UNCLASSIFIED 131, 954. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 131, 954. 00 , 0. 0 11 •a1 2 2 2 Is 2' 3 3 3 J 3. S 3' 3 31 3! 4, 42 43 S 44 05 46 hip 4, 48 49 ,F 50 51 52 S 53 54 5:, IP X FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 • • t.J ur MtKVIUSA-17tALH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 16.-0/ 0009 09/17/90 YEAR -COMPLETE--. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION • MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. OF ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 1214.ERDSP FXP WEPT- MGMILSURROR_T 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2 4397 2 57. Att1LCIRAIFI) RAVINGS 254.757 00- q_ 0 0 00 0 00 25457 00- D.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL ,7 122,803.00- 0.0 122,803.00- 0.00 0.00 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL 122,803.00- • 0.00 0.00 0.00 122,803.00- 0.0 � 'BUD1FT TRANSFER DEPT' NGMILSUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER •393- ._ OPERAISNG TRANSEERSOt1T 130.-474-00 85.-55T-33 89,-640-66 0-00 40.833:-34 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 130, 474. 00 85, 557. 33 89, 640. 66 0. 00 40, 833. 34 68-7 68. 7 DIVISION TOTAL 130, 474.00 85, 557.33 89, 640.66 0.00 40, 833.34 68.7 DEPAENT TIITAI 2...601-694 nO 2A9. £163!66 38.1.-.-938.-58 2.-028 17 2.-217,-727--25 1-4 7 2101 POLICE DEPT: POLICE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 579, 135.00 43, 156.70 85, 280.82 0.00 493, 854.18 14.7 4103_RFRULAE-SALARIESISAEFTY 1.,4,26,_9_90_00 1'31,182_10 266,_710_55 0-00 1-360.279 45 16. 3 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 16.6 22, 560.00 1,880.00 3,760.00 0.00 18, 800. 00 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 20, 000.00 1,465.09 6,228.78 0.00 13, 771.22 31.1 4107 PR w t w 1 w -6.000 00 15.569 70 L 894 17 n 0Q _64,_105_83 _3 2 4109 COURT TIME 20, 000. 00 2,204.70 3,917.00 0. 00 16, 083. 00 19. 5 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 44, 574.00 0.00 1,655.28 0.00 42, 918.72 3.7 4111__AC.CRUALDASH_IN 44.52 00 1.217 90 3.010..30 0 00 41-563.70 6 7 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 21, 000.00 0.0 21, 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4114 POLICE RESERVES 24, 000.00 2,490.00 4.949.00 0.00 19, 051.00 20.6 4117 SHTFT TIIFFFRFNTTAI 9, 0.<,5_0n 634_77 1. 91.1_96 n 00 7.753_04 14 4 4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 9,000.00 430.52 874.20 0.00 8,125.80 9.7 4187 UNIFORMS 38,500.00 2,219.33 4,871.45 1,282.91 32, 345.64 15. 9 nBJFr.T SUBILUAL 2_._555.....398._00 703....050 21 41.4,46'1 91 1.28P 91 2.139-651-5P 16 2 ' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 42Q1 CONIRACT SFRVTDF/PRIVATF 110.497 00 1R54940 20.79,5 A7 n 00 R4,_.640 3 IR R , ' 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 35, 229. 00 2,207.07- .,. 2,207.07- . 0. 00 37, 436. 07 6. 2 , OBJECT SUBTOTAL 145, 666.00 16.342.33 18, 589.60 0.00 127, 076.40 12.7 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 0. 00 74.03 74.03 0.00 74.03- 0.0 z 0 12 13 14 ,5 ,6 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2) 28 29 0 2 3 z 41 49 51 5 9 3 56 69 0 j .1 0 64 64 • r. 64 64 V 64 9 9 9 9 9 3 5 6 7 9 3 IG 17 1 2 21 2 2. 2 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 4 48 49 Sc 51 5 53 54 55 56 6 ' 2 3 5 ' 2 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 , r -f G R I"! U 38 K -Li Cf11..1l EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0010 DATE 09/17/90 07 OF YEAR -16 -COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 2101_EOL.I.CE 0FPT• Pn TCF 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 28._890 00 333.63 54 4.073_92 n 00 24...816_08 14 1 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 36,000.00 3,968.31 5,919.78 1,974.07 28, 106.15 21.9 4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE ' 10, 160.00 1.042.97 1,160.78 209. 11 8,790.11 13.4 ' 30Z _RADIO MAZNIENANCE 3._000._00 248 23 42173 1.125 41 1.402.96 53 2 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 7,500.00 904.40 904.40 65.00 . 6,530.60 12.9 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 19, 250.00 2,529.66 4,160.54 0.00 15, 089.46 21.6 4311 AUTO MAINIENANCE 223_00.0 00 2,53.a....81 4,1_4Z._22 554 72 17.298__06 21.__3 4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 21, 500.00 961.83 . 5,749.99 0.00 15, 750.01 26.7 4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 8,500.00 50. 00 50. 00 0. 00 8,450.00 0. 5 ' 315___MEMBERSHTP 1,660_00 25_00 75__00 0__00 1,585-00 4 5 4316 TRAINING 14, 000.00 11, 368.09 18.7 1,084.03 1,064.03 1,547.88 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4,500.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4,500.00 0. 0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS UFR CH0S 331 904 n0 77 R21 nn 55...646._00 0 00 978258_C0 16 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 510, 864. 00 44, 710. 81 ..';' 83, 467. 42 - 5,526.19 421, 870. 39 17.4 5400 F(UTPMENS 5401 EGUIPMENT-LESS THAN $500 550.00 0.00 0.00 2,178.54 1,628.54- 396.0 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 30, 086. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 30, 086. 00 0. 0 ORJFCT SURTOTAL '30 AlA nn n OCL n 00 2 17P 54 28 452-46_____-_.7_1. 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS -• 6900 1 EASE PAYMENIS 134..62A. n0 • . 2.106-07 '44,419 LO 0 00 90.-206.-90 32-9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 134, 626. 00 2.306.07 44, 419. 10 0. 00 90, 206. 90 32. 9 DIVISION TOTAL 3, 377, 190.00 266, 409. 42 560, 939.63 .. 8,987.64 2, 807, 262.73 16.8 DFPARTMFNT TOTAI '1.'177.190 00 2A6,_404 42 560.919_A3 9.987-64 2.907,262-71 16 R 2201 FIRE DEPT: FIRE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES" 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 43, 789.00 3,350.00 6,700.00 0.00 37, 089.00 15.3 4103_REGUI AR SALARIESLSAFFTY 857. 791__00 74..631.-24 150.-109-42 0 00 707.-681_-58 1L-4 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 99, 500.00 12, 411. 32 26, 433. 39 0.00 73, 066.61 26.5 4108 FLSA OVERTIME 60, 255. 00 9,696.95 13, 944. 04 0. 00 46, 310. 96 23. 1 4110 VACATTfN/S1.CK PAY OFF 18._032 nn 0 00 0 00 n no 1P.032_00 0 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 18, 032. 00 0. 00 ,: 24, 236. 73 0.00 6,204.73- 134.4 4119 FITNESS INCENTIVE 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00- 0.0 4187_UNIEORMS S._040_00 941_..32 919_-32 140_27 6.-980-41 13 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 105, 439. 00 100, 631. 33 222, 642. 90 140. 27 882, 655. 83 20. 1 r 4 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 38 39 41 42 3 as 48 52 54 5 6 7 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 72 73 74 75 J ,' 3 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 r1LY_DF_1-IERMOSA EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT FROM 08/01/90 TO J3EACH (13Y FUND) 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 0011 09/17/90 YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 16 07 OF ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE lc 001 GENERAL FUND 22Q1___EIRE DEPT' FIRE 21718 00 21. 718. 00 1.(21_530 88 10. 530. 88 11,_65738 11. 657. 38 0.00 0. 00 10.060_62 10, 060. 62 53 A 53. 6 ' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4_300 MATER IALSLSUFELSESLOTHER ' ° 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCEJIAIERIALS 3. 750. 00 3. 800. 00 7100(1_00 3, 080. 00 1, 000. 00 650_00 388. 15 134. 39 R89_._42 98. 67 103. 22 100.00 399. 88 247. 22 907 97 • . . 205. 51 103. 22 100 00 0. 00 552. 78 183_57 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 3. 350. 12 3, 000. 00 5.913_._51 2, 874. 49 896. 78 350 00 10. 6 21. 0 15 -5 6. 6 10. 3 46 1 ° 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315__C1EMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR ❑UT -INS USER CHCS 2. 500. 00 2. 000. 00 91, 210. 00 85. 00 0. 00 7. 60.L_00 90. 00 0. 00 15. 202_00 17, 450. 75 0. 00 3, 880. 22 3. RRA 27 75,_096_0R 25. 096. 08 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 736. 35 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 0 00 0. 00 2. 410. 00 2. 000. 00 76..O08_00 3. 6 0. 0 11, 3 3 4 4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1940_EM IPt1ENT 114, 990. 00 1. 900. 00 2. 100. 00 4. 000 00 9, 599. 85 0. 00 3. 880. 22 3, R80 22 96, 802. 90 1. 900. 00 1, 780. 22- 1 19 7R 5L-444-92 6 15. 8 0. 0 184.7 91_0 30 4 ° ° 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6200 1 FASB PAYMENTS 82. 541 00 82. 541. 00 47 74 47. 74 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 57. 444. 92 30. 4 4 4 4 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT Tf1TA1 1. 328. 688. 00 1. 72R. AEA 00 124, 690. 02 124. A90 n2 280, 727. 33 280. 777 31 876. 62 R7A 1,2 1. 047. 084. 05 1.....43_4-7..._084-05 21.1 21 1 4 5 s 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC _ 4L06_REGI.ILAROVERII[IF 96, 342. 00 L_000_ 00 1, 927. 00 1, 927. 00 500. 00 500. 00 102. 196. 00 6, 961. 03 0 00 0. 00 50. 45 63._37 18. 76 7. 093. 61 13. 818. 34 158-__5R 0. 00 544. 37 151. 35 37. 52 14, 710. 16 0. 00 0 011 0. 00 O. 00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 82, 523. 66 841_47 14.3 15 R 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4117 _SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 1. 927. 00 1, 382. 63 348._65 0. 0 28.2 30. 2 6 6 6 6 6 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 462. 48 87. 485. 84 7. 5 14. 3 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 1, 900. 00 280. 76 292. 26 0. 00 1. 607. 74 15.3 G , '' 7. 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4, 4 4 51 s SC 3 4 5 6 9 9 10 11 12 13 14 '5 16 '7 '9 19 2 20 n 23 2d 25 26 2, 29 29 30 2 13 4 5 8 0 3 49 A 2 3 "i4 s s6 0 60 2 64 66 , ce 0 6 6 9 10 11 '2 2 3 47 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 . . , i , ,C_G,C MALI JM-A2C.nt.D EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT -(BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90- PAGE 0012 DATE 09/17/90 _16_07 OF-YEAR_COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 2401_ANIMAI Cf1NTROL DEPT ANIMAI REGAL TN 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES . -, ■• FRVICF/GOVT 6.000 00 73, 95 777 99 0 on 5.266_01 12 7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' 7, 900. 00 1, 014. 71 1, 026. 21 0. 00 6, 873. 79 12. 9 4902P1ATERIALSLSUPPI LESLOIHER_ 4304 TELEPHONE 700. 00 70.42 104. 38 0.00 595.62 14.9 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1, BOO. 00 1. 50 2. 50 439. 34 1, 358. 16 24. 5 R Bon n0 n 00 0_00 0 00 800 00 0._.0 4:109 MAINTENANCE -_MATERIAL 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 1, 540. 00 1, 229. 92 20. 1 179. 21 310. 08 0. 00 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2, 500. 00 76. 65 76. 65 0. 00 2, 423. 35 3. 0 ' MEMfERSHTP 50 00 0 00 0 00 0 -00 50-00 0 0 4315 4316 TRAINING 350.00 0.00 350.00 0.0' 0.00 0.00 ' 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 550. 00 0.0 4196 TRRFR OUT -TNS UFR CH(_S 11.559 00 9/13_00 1,-926-00 0 00 9+633-00 16.6 5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 849. 00 1, 290. 78 2, 419. 61 : 439. 34 16, 990. 05 14. 4 ] 6 54II0.EQUIEIiENI 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 000: 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS- - 714. 00 _. 56. 15 112. 30 - 0. 00 601. 70 15. 7 714.00 96_45 112,.,.30 0-00 60.1..70 15 7 4 0RJFrT SIJRTOTAI 6 O nIVIRInN TTAI 1'11.1,59 no 9.455 75 1R. PAR 7R 479 74 117.911 3R 14 7 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 131, 659. 00 9, 455. 25 18, 268. 28 439. 34 112, 951. 38 14. 2 ° 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT: DISASTER PREP SFRV.LCF4 4100 PFRSONAI 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 24, 826. 00 2, 201. 52 4, 403. 04 ..0. 00 20, 422. 96 17. 7 4 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 497. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 497. 00 0. 0 5 CASH 492_00 0 on n 00 0 nn 497_00 0 0 6 4111 ACCRUAL IN 4187 UNIFORMS 285.00 14. 58 29. 16 0.00 255.84 10.2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26, 105. 00 2, 216. 10 4, 432. 20 0. 00 21, 672. 80 16. 9 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 2.800 on 0.00 610.03 0.00 610.03- 0.0 0 0 0_O0 0_00 n no 2.800_00 21. 7 -C0NIRACSERV10ELGJ1VT 4251 Z 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 800. 00 0. 00 610. 03 0. 00 2, 189. 97 3 1 A • 5 C 2 2 2 2 30 3 3 3 J 3 3 34 39 4 4 4 6 0 3 6 6 9 0 2 3 5 6 8 9 0 36 39 0 6 .67 2 3 5 ] 9 6, 6263 64 J 3. J J r J 65 67 5 ✓ 56 69 72 ]3 ]4 L 3 6 , e 3 3 41 42 43 44 47 46 49 50 1 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 y. , ur_L7crtn1J(i_17CHl.n EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO OB/31/90 PAGE DATE 16 07 OF 0013 09/17/90 YEAR__COMP_LEIF FUND DIV ODJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 2ZQ1 CIVII-DEFENSE DEPT: DISASTER PREP 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUEFLIES 3, 72:1.40 0. 00 0 00 0-00 1 725 00 0_0 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 600. 00 0.00 600.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 4316 TRAINING 3, 600. 00 30. 00 480. 00 0. 00 3, 120. 00 13. 3 • 96_7RSF_e_plarINS_USER_CHGS 2.419 00 193_00 186_00 0 00 1.933 00 16 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 244. 00 223. 00 866. 00 0. 00 9, 378. 00 8. 4 QEQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL A. 000 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 6, 000 00 0 0 DIVISION TOTAL 45. 149 00________2,_4_39 10 9.9ns 21 n nn 3Q.2411 77 13 0 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 45, 149. 00 2, 439. 10 5, 908. 23 0. 00 39, 240. 77 13. 0 3101 MEDIANS DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN • •0 PFRSf)NAI SFRVIf ES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 50, 847. 00 3, 894. 53 7, 784. 91 0. 00 43, 062. 09 15.3 , 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 300.00 0.00 0. 00 : 0. 00 300. 00 0.0 • OiIACAILONLSICK PAY OFF 1, 017 00 0_00 0 On 0 00 1017 00 0 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 017. 00 0. 00 1, 017. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 53, 181. 00 3, 894. 53 7, 784. 91 0. 00 45, 396. 09 14. 6 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 47, 630. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 47, 630. 00 0. 0 ONTRA('T SERVICELGf1UT 1.760 nn n no 0 00 0 00 1.260 00 -0 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 48, 890. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 48, 890. 00 0. 0 • •_0L_MATERIA1 S/SUPP1 IFS/f1THFR 4303 UTILITIES 9, 027. 00 549. 50 549. 50 0. 00 8, 477. 50 6. 0 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 6, 000. 00 0. 00. 0. 00 0. 00 6, 000. 00 0. 0 • 310_MOTOR FI)ELS__AND_LUBFS ' A60_00 1 41 5 27 0_00 654._73 0 7 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 500. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 500. 00 0. 0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS . 4, 686. 00 391. 00 782. 00 0. 00 3, 904. 00 16. 6 • c FCT SI1RTOTA1 'PO. R71 0n 941 91 1. 11A 77 n n0 19. 51A 71 A 4 5400 EQUIPMENT 4OLEGUIPMFNT-1 ESS-IHAN__$5.00 Son nn 0 nn n__on 0 00 500 00 0 0 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS 1, 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 500. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 000. 00 0. 00 0..00 0. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 0 55 56 4,17 J z 3 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0014 DATE 09/17/90 16, - OF YEAR -COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE -07. UNENC BALANCE % 5 6 7 6 ] ° 001 GENERAL FUND T 4.-838-44 9. 12-1-.-68 0. 00 11-5,822=32 7. 9 10 n z 10 12 UN TO D I V I S TOTAL 3103 ST MAINTENANCE DEPT: 124.44.-00 5 ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 3 14 5 6 14 1520 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 155, 214. 00 11, 833. 59 23, 854. 88 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0X00 0. 00 0. 00 131, 359. 12 15.3 500.00 0.0 i6 9 20 isz, '] '" REGULAR-OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 500-00 3, 104. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 104. 00 0. 00 0. 00 161- '72.---00----1-1...-83.3.-59--------23.-854-88 82.5"77--00 2.-868-75 2. 868. 75 3, 104. 00 0. 0 3, 104. 00 0. 0 138.-067-12 1 • 80.408.-25 3 ' zz 23 2 ° 19 70 21 OBJFCT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 'ERVICE/-P-R-IVATE 1, 100. 00 8. 3 81, 2011 25 3. 5 Z' Z' z5 -CONTRACT 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 200. 00 100. 00 100. 00 84, 177. 00 2, 968. 75 2, 968. 75 '' 27 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 14, 800. 00 - 988. 35 1, 005. 32 4.".180.01 327..-19 596-25 ' 176. 78 0-00 930. 15 0. 00 0^00 - 13, 617. 90 7. 9 3.-583.75 14.-2 11, 599. 91 14.0 600. 00 0.0 44436 00 16.-6 '° 29 -MOTOR .EUELS_AND_LUBFG 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 13, 500. 00 889. 66 969. 94 600. 00 0.00 0.00 53,32_4_00 4.444_00 9. R88._00 86, 404. 00 6, 649. 20 11. 459. 51 30 31 32 33 439A TRSFR ALIT -TNS IJSFR CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1. 106. 93 73, 837. 56 14.5 91 4l. 43 45 '° 5 36 5_4.00-EQU.IPMEN7 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 200.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 200. 00 0.0 200.00 0.0 46 "] 46 37 30 J9 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 20. 144. 00 1. 736. 78 5, 210. 34 20 B44 n0 1 7'l.1, 78 5 10_34 '35'1.947 00 73.188 37 •3 493 4R O. 00 0 00 1 1Qf, 9'i P. 15, 633. 66 24.9 19.-633.66_______24-9 'vn8,_g4- - 50 $1 52 53 '" 55 56 57 5e 59 60 61 40 az OR.JECT G11ATnTAI TOTAI `° 1'1TV i4 Tf1N 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 45 45 °] 4B 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 106, 327. 00 7, 095. 83 13, 703. 61 n n0 A8_5,4 0. 00 n 00 0. 00 0. 00 n S10 ' 0 00 92, 623. 39 12.8 431._4' 2, 127. 00 0. 0 1, 990. 79 6. 4 97,__L72_-6 1 5 , 000 nn n n 62 63 - 64 66 67 66 ]0 n ]3 ]3 I 4106REGULAR_OVERIMF 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 500_00 2, 127. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 127. 00 136. 21 136. 21 1_11�OR1 nn 7. 712_04 17, 908_3P 19.000 00 0 00 A Stn °' 50 51 5z 5' - ' nBJFrT SUBTOTAI ' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 54 55 56 4701 CSINTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4 a J J J J • • • 1r e • • r 1, • 9 • 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3: 3: 3. 3.. 3E 3 3„ to 7' 40 4z 43 44 45 40 47 49 51 52 53 55 L FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 `• i-. , LUC-ptttrIUSR__11tAl.H EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO OB/31/90 PAGE 0015 DATE 09/17/90 16 07 OF YEAR_ -COMPLETE - FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 1104 3RAEFIC SAFFTY DEPT• SILHWYLSLDRAiN 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ONIRACZSERVICE/GOVT 8, 117 00 132_9- '432_85- 0__00 8, 449. 85 4 1 23, 117. 00 332. 85- 332. 85- 0. 00 23, 449. 85 1. 4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 430Q__'lAIERI ALS LSU2PLIESLDT_HER 4303 UTILITIES 6, 180. 00 534. 38 534. 38 0. 00 5, 645. 62 B. 6 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 36, 000. 00 11, 605. 62 15, 598. 07 11, 505. 65 8, 896. 28 75. 2 ' 310_11OI0R-EUEI S AND 1 11HFS 1._430_00 163_86 ?53.-99 0 00 1.-176-01 1-7. 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1. 185.78 7 1. 1 1, 200. 00 14. 22 14. 22 0. 00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 200.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 140.00 30.0 4316 TRAINING "400 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 300-00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 9, 401. 00 783. 00 1, 566. 00 0. 00 7, 835. 00 0.0 16. 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 54, 711. 00 13, 101. 08 18, 026. 66 11, 505. 65 25, 178. 69 53. 9 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 2, 380. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 380. 00 0. 0 1711,JFCT SUBIOTAL 2.-380. 00 0.-00 0.00 0.00 2,-380-00 0.0 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 690n 1 FASE_P_AY1FNTS 10,419_6_00 841. 29 2,-523.-87 0. 00 7-,_572 13 24.-9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 24. 9 10, 096. 00 841. 29 2. 523. 87 0. 00 7, 572. 13 DIVISION TOTAL 201, 385. 00 20, 841. 56 34, 126. 06 11, 505. 65 155, 753. 29 22. 6 fFPARTMFNT Tf]TAI A79, R7.4 00________413.,13(1R 7a RA. 741 27 12. Al a 9S 580.-522.--20 14.-6 4101 PLANNING DEPT: PLANNING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 209, 376. 00 12, 120. 69 24, 551. 80 0. 00 184, 824. 20 11. 7 4106RFGUI AR nVFRTIMF 300_ 00 0 00 0L00 nL no 300^00 0 0 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4, 188. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 188. 00 0. 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4, 188. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 188. 00 0. 0 4112 PART TIMEIIEIIP_DRAR.Y 7.800.._00 3.536.-_50 7.064-28 0 00 735 72 90.-5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 194, 235. 92 13. 9 225, 852. 00 15, 957. 19 31, 616. 08 0. 00 4200__CDNI&AC T SEM/ICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE :; `, 62. 000. 00 120. 95 120. 95 0. 00 61, 879. 05 0. 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 62, 000. 00 120. 95 120. 95 0. 00 61, 879. 05 0. 1 4300 MATER IALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 1, 712. 00 322. 75 381. 43 0. 00 1, 330. 57 22. 2 • 1371 3 t0 11 12 13 15 16 to t9 0 J 1 22 n 9 0 3 5 c 0 0 4 5 2 9 4 J 74 9 0 2 3 4 5 0 '.v 41, 0 3 8 9 0 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 9 ,0 3 65 66 58 59 GO 6, 5263 45 66 67 68 69 7701 72 13 774 '5 'L �.V U n J J J. -01 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 fL 1.-1 ur-HtKrluSA--IstAL EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 ' PAGE 0016 DATE 09/17/90 16.07 OF--YEAR--COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X 001 GENERAL FUND DEPT: PLANNIN 4101-P-LANNINC 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4109 AFF TCF nPFR RUPP_LIES 19.900 On '125 R9 991- 23 850. -DO 13. 653.-77 1 - 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 220.00 .. .. 0.00 14.90 0.00 205. 10 6.7 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 600.00 0.00 589.03 0. 00 10. 97 98. 1 MENIERSHTP 1125_0O 9_5_00 95 00 0 00 .730 00 11 -5 431.5_ 4316 TRAINING 1, 800. 00 1, 800. 00 0.0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ' 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1,250.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 250. 00 0. 0 ' CHR 9�616_00 R0.1.-00 ' 1. 602.00 0 00 8,-014.-00 1 - • 96_nRSFR nup_.1.- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 31, 523. 00 26, 994. 41 14. 3 1, 544. 60 3, 678. 59 850. 00 00-EQUSP-MEN? 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 400.00 5.06 5.06 0.00 394.94 1.2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 400.00 5.06 5.06 0. 00 394. 94 1. 2 ' DIVISION TOTAL 319, 775. 00 ' 17, 627. 80 35, 420. 68 ;850. 00 283, 504. 32 11. 3 4102 PLANNING COMM DEPT: PLANNING SFRVTf •• ■.TRACT 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 6, 000. 00 450. 50 595. 00 0. 00 5, 405. 00 9. 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 000. 00 . 450. 50 595. 00 0. 00 5, 405. 00 9. 9 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5, 000. 00 250. 14 665. 16 0. 00 4, 334. 84 204_00 13. 3 0. • '61,4 TRAINING 20_4._00 0_.00 n n0 O. On 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1, 200. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 200. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 404. 00 250. 14 665. 16 0: 00 5, 738. 84 10. 3 DIVISION . TOTAL 12, 404. 00 700. 64 1, 260. 16 0. 00 11, 143. 84 10. 1 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 332, 179. 00 18, 328. 44 . 36, 680. 84 850. 00 294, 648. 16 11. 2 4 ' 4201 BUILDING DEP-T: CONST -I -ENGINE IG 8 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 14.-8404 31.-786.-36. 0.00 209.-603.-64 13. 1 4102-REGULAR-SALARSES/1'ISC 241.-3-90._00 19 REGULAR OVERTIME 500. 00 0. 00 . . 0. 00 ' ` 0. 00 500. 00 0. 0 iO 4106 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4, 828. 00 2, 383. 96 : 2. 383. 96 0. 00 2, 444. 04 49. 3 0,-0 i2 4.-828 00 0.-00 0. -OG 0.-00 4.-828,-0G 13. 5 • 11.1 -ACCRUAL CASH -I -N OBJECT SUBTOTAL 251, 546. 00 17, 224. 70 34, 170. 32 0. 00 217, 375. 68 .4 6 C • '.v 41, 0 3 8 9 0 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 9 ,0 3 65 66 58 59 GO 6, 5263 45 66 67 68 69 7701 72 13 774 '5 'L �.V U n J J J. -01 C. 61, 4, ' w' ,./V V' z VO2 . 3 3 1 3 3 11 36 3 37 39 39 40 *41 42 43 !r °4 45 46 * 47 48 49 _, 50 51 52 * 53 Y56, ° 3 G FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 CTTY OF HERMOSA_BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 (BY FUND) PAGE DATE 0017 09/17/90 -COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 16 07 OF -YEAR ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE - 001 GENERAL FUND • 42Q1_13111. fljj DFPT• C0NST/ENG.L1uJENF 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ' 20.LCONTRACI_SERVICEL P T VATF 55.,g27 n0 106_7? 198rb5 Q, 405_46 46,-02289 17 4251 CONTRACT 890.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 890.00 5 0.0 SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 56, 717. 00 106. 72 398. 65 9, 405. 46 46, 912. 89 17. 2 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 5 9j 4304 TELEPHONE '3Q5_OFFTCF f1PFR SUPPLIES 2, 461. 00 6.825_00 319. 50 482^63 418. 19 912.49 0. 00 2, 042. 81 189_.-69 9..722 16. 9 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 82 0.00 363.37 16. 1 37. 1 578.00 175. 56 214.63 z AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315-MEM13ERSHTP 525.00 30.86 30.86 0.00 494. 14 5.8 365^00 0 00 25 00 0 00 340.00 4316 TRAINING 3, 000. 00 190. 00 190. 00 99. 00 2, 711. 00 6. 8 9. 6 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4'396, 1, 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 500. 00 0. 0 TR9FR OUT -TNS 11SER DI GS 11. 09Q_00 a. 59100 52_1-82.-00 0-00 25, 908,-00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 288. 69 39, 082. 14 16,-6 15. 6 46, 344. 00 3, 789. 55 6, 973. 17 9400 FnU1pMFNT e 3401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 700. 00 0. 0 5403 VEHICLES 11, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 11, 000. 00 0. 0 f1R.IFCT S11RT0TA1 11.700 nn 0 nn n. 00 0-00 11.700.-00 0 0 IILVJ.SlOW----IOTAI 366,..307.00 21. 120.97 41..-542. 14 9. 69 15 315.-070x1 ` . 13-9 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4 4 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 191, 877. 00 13, 275. 91 27, 628. 20 0. 00 164, 248. 80 14.3 5 4110-IACATInN/STrK_P_AY-OFF 3,-838-00 0.-00 0.-0O 0 00 3, 838.-00 0.-0 ' 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 0. 00 3, 838. 00 0. 0 5 3, 838. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4187 UNIFORMS 7, 210. 00 453. 98 453. 98 0. 00 6, 756. 02 6. 2 5 OB•IFCT Sill; TnTA1 20.4. 7A'7 nn 1'i. 77q R9 78,..08? 18 0_00____17-13...680_82 1'4,_ 5 5 5 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ; 4201-CONIRAf T 4ERV.ICELP_RIVATE 3...00000 146 28 15L-78 0. 00 2. 842-22 9. 2 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 2, 842. 22 5. 2 66 , 3, 000. 00 146. 28 157. 78 4100 MATER TAI S/SUPPI TFS/nTHFR 6 4304 TELEPHONE 5, 564. 00 648. 62 838. 60 0. 00 4, 725. 40 15. 0 6 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9, 890. 00 579. 09 1, 356. 77 0. 00 8, 533. 23 13.7 6 4312MOIOR_EUELS._ANDLUBFS 1.036_00 156._1P 223._89 0.00 812.-11 21 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 2. 040. 00 6 1. 6 , 34. 43 34. 43 0. 00 2, 005. 57 4315 MEMBERSHIP 740. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 740. 00 0. 0 7 . z 5 7 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 16 7 18 19 z0 z 13 5 7 0 0 3 6 5 6 9 2 2, 0 5 5 b J FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 . . , T um^ r. euau.=m-ac -= EXPENDITURE SUMMARYREPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90DATE PAGE 0018 09/17/90 z 3 16T -0% -OF -YEAR -COMPLETE 5 b FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE e 001 GENERAL FUND 9 " , ,202PUB WKS ADMIN DEPT• CONSI/-ENGINI-ENF • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2.ono on IA no ' 16 00 0 00 1- 984 00 O. 8 • - , , N.jNO 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE . 1, 000. 00 16. 00 984. 00 1. 6 , 16. 00 0. 00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 48, 440. 00 4, 037. 00 8, 074. 00 0. 00 40, 366. 00 60.150-31 16. 6 14-9 2 ZO. 71n_ nn 9,82.32 10,--552 69 0. 00 nB,JFrT SURTnTAL 2 5400 EQUIPMENT 0-58 49.4 2 2 94n1 Ff;l1TPMFNT-I FSS THAN $5pn 79. 00 74. 62 74. 62 O. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 75.00 74.62 74.62 0.00 0.38 99.4 2 DIVISION TOTAL 280, 548. 00 19, 438. 11 38, 874. 27 0. 00 241, 673. 73 13. 8. 3 3 • • c • •EPT: CONST/ENG3.NI-ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ' 1-55.742.00 12.288-64 214-554-04 0,00------1-31-,210,96------45.7 ° 4102-REGULAR-SALAR-IES/-MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1, 600. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 600. 00 0. 0 , 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 3, 115. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 115. 00 0. 0 2-533-00-18. 6 ° 4111 31-5.100 582-00 582-00 0.00 AL 4187 UNIFORMS ,-1 315.00 16.68 33.36 ' 0.00 281.64 10. 5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL . - 163, 907. 00 .' 12, 887. 29 25, 166. 40 0. 00 138, 740. 60 15. 3 ° 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES , 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 21, 260. 00 1, 405. 00 1, 785. 00 0. 00 19, 475. 00 8. 3 ° 7 260^00 1.._405.-00 1.-785.-00 0.00 19.-475,-00 8.-3 nR.IFCT SIIRTOTAI ° 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 9-0.-000,-00 7.-829-45 0-00 82,470-55 8. 6 e 43n3 UT Ti IT IES 7,-829-45 ° 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40, 000. 00 2, 170. 19 2, 248. 06 1, 252. 45 36, 499. 49 B. 7 13.3 2 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES BOO. 00 82. 67 131.77 107.03 326.-03 0. 00 0.-00 692. 97 2-7-3.-97 54.-3 0.0 4311 AUTO -MAINTENANCE 600.00 4316 TRAINING 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0. 7 ° 15 4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY 8, 000. 00 '24.-834. 00 - 21. 32 - 2-.-070. 00 ' • 60. 08 4140-00 ' 0. 00 7, 939. 92 16-6 0-00 20.-694--00 'b 4396- TRSFR- OU -T=I NS -USER -CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 164, 434. 00 12, 305. 40 14, 710. 65 1, 252. 45 148, 470. 90 9. 7 n f,3 9400-EQUIP_IEN-T 650. 00 0. 0 39 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 650. 00 - ,:� ,., 0. 00 0. 00 ,,. "� 0. 00 O. so 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5. 500. 00 6.-.150.-00 O. 00 0. 00 ' 0. 00 0. 00 _ O. 00 0-00 5, 500. 00 6.450-00 0. 0 ,, nRJEC.T SUIITD.IAL s2 i3 'j.2- 1? 0 359. 751 nn ?!A. 9R7 69 41. AJP n5 1.752 45 R1A 5n s^ DTVIRTfN TfTAI •6 i1 s) .s 9 r 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3• 3' 3: 3 4C 41 42 43 44 45 45 4) 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 59 3 10 ;2 i3 14 is ;6 ;, 36 29 2 5 9 0 2 3 0 65 7 J 6 .1 3 J FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 CTTY (1F_IERMOSA_I3EACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT FROM 08/01/90 TO (BY FUND) 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 0019 09/17/90 _YEAR_COMPLETE- FUND DIV ODJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 16-0%_..OF ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 4205_EQLUP SFRVTCF T)FPT• CONSI1ENGINLENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REQULARSALARI.ES/MISC 104,_362_a0 R. 190 A7 16.-353 13 0.-00 88.-006. 87 +,J` 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 600.00 6 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 600.00 41II ACCR_UAL.CASH_IN 2. 087. 00 2, 08.2_00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2. 087. 00 0. 0 0 DQ 0 00 0 00 2. 087.00 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 5. 000. 00 0. 00 5. 000. 00 0. Q 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 114, 136. 00 8, 190. 67 16, 355. 13 0. 00 97. 780. 87 14. 3 ° 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATER I ALS 431Q NOIOR_EUELS AND__LUBER 4, 500. 00 1. 210. 16 210. 16 0. 00 4. 289. 84 4. 6 650_00 46_05 54 26 475 08 1. 12066 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 3. 150. 00 19. 99 100. 27 0. 00 3. 049. 73 32 0 3. 1 4396 TRPFR OUT 200. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 200.00 0.0 -INS 1/SFR CHCS 10. 177 no 4_4-00 1.688 00 0 00 8.-439 00 16.6 G OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19. 627. 00 1, 120. 20 2. 052. 69 475. 08 17, 099. 23 12. 8 5400_EQUIEMENT ° 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 20, 400. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 400. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 400. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 400. 00 0. 0 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 4 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 5. 016. 00 417. 96 1, 253. 88 0. 00 3, 762. 12 24.9 ❑BJE.CT SLJT1TOTA1 5.-.01.6_0n 417 9/. 1.253..-88 0 00 3.762.-12 24-.-9 DIVISION TOTAL 159. 179 on 9. 72R R9 19. A,41 70 475 0R 179 042 22 12 6 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1. 161, 785. 00 76, 885. 60 141, 740. 16 11. 421. 68 1, 008, 623. 16 13. 1 4601 COMM RESOURCES DEPT: COMM PROMOTION ' •• "EESONAL SERV ICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 161, 037. 00 11. 988. 20 23, 308. 70 0. 00 137, 728. 30 14.4 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 1.000.00 260.63 885.82 0.00 114. 18 88.5 '11Q_VACAil ONLSICI&P.AY_DFF 3.221.00 0.00 0 00 0 00 3.221_00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3, 221. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3. 221. 00 0_0 0. 0 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY .63, 500. 00 8. 773. 26 17, 528. 54 0. 00 45, 971. 46 27.6 6 0 e 1 _ - - 11 122 09 41.729 06 0 00 190.255 94 17 9 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ' 20LCONIRACI SERV_ICELP_E.LVATF 65.650 00 10. 95Q_86 ILL 0 00 53.-799-1-4 1 R 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 65. 650. 00 10. 950. 86 -850-86 11, 850. 86 0. 00 53. 799. 14 18.0 ; , 3 10 ;2 i3 14 is ;6 ;, 36 29 2 5 9 0 2 3 0 65 7 J 6 .1 3 J FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11: 13:09 r TTY 0E-_-HERMOSA-BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 0 9 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. J J 1 PAGE 0020 2 DATE 09/17/90 3 --, 16. OX -OF --YEAR -.-COMPLETE4. - 6 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 8 9 001 GENERAL FUND 4601 -COMM -RESOURCES DEPT: COMM-RROMOTION 11 112 !S 15 5 20 21 22 2 24 25 26 27 20 29 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4302Ans/ERrrGTNG 11. 000 n0 139_97 139 97 260.--12 10.-59991 4304 TELEPHONE !4,300.00 471.09 604.15 0.00 3,695.85 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 7,600.00 1,384.14 1,765.46 2,633.41 3,201.13 4308_PR0GRAM MATERIAI R 1'1.000_00 2,-232-27 3.-812-69 " 690 68- 8. 496-63 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 700.00 67.69 85.58 0.00 614.42 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 700_00 0-00 0.-00 0-00 700-00 4316 TRAINING 1,000.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 980.00 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,600.00 4396-TRSER-OUT-INS-USER-CHGS 20.557-00 1.-713-00 3.-426.-00 0-00 17, -131. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 60, 757. 00 6,028.16 9,853,85 3,584.21 47, 318. 94 3 6 14. 0 57. 8 34. 6 12. 2 0. 0 0 O 2.0 0.0 16. 6 22. 1 10 12 13 14 15 16 11 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M 30 5400 FOOTPMFMT 0 1 32 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 f1R.IFCT SURTOTAI 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS A900 IFARF PAYMFNT4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 449. 00 948. 81 1, 000. 00 ' 0. 00 54_449 00 948-81 948.81 0.00 3.500. 19 21.3 0.00 0.00 1.000.00 0.0 948x81 0.00 4,-500.-1-9 1- 2. Inn On 1 F19 L,5 37930 2,300.00- 189.65 379.30 . 3 34 35 7 36 DIVISION TOTAL DFPARTMFNT T[TTAI 366, 135.00 39, 139. 57 3A A. 1'i5 nn '19. 1'19 57 6101 PARKS DEPT: PARKS/REC 64, 755. 88 444,755 R8 0 00 0.00 1-920-7-0 16, 4 1, 920. 70 . 16. 4 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 42 44 45 3,584.21 297, 794.91 18.6 46 47 -1.-584-21---2-92.-7-9-4 91 18 6 a9 50 s1 52 9 40 42 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 RFG !UL -AR OVERTTM 43 44 46 47 49 40 50 51 53 79, 364. 00 500 00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT RURT1lTAI 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 (fl OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,587.00 • 1,587. 00 a';.03R 00 6, 139. 84 n no 0.00 0. 00 A. 139 114 5.110 00 Pon 00 138, 510. 00 • ':200. 00 12, 275. 52 0 00 0.00 0. 00 1a• 775 52 700 nn 200. 00 0. 00 67, 088. 48 15. 4 n 00 50(1_130 0 0 0. 00 1, 587. 00 0. 0 0. 00 1, 587. 00 0. 0 0 00 70.762_48 14 7 7.727 50 136 082 90 2,227.50 136, 082. 50 1 7 1. 7 53 5. 55 56 4300_ MAIERIALSLSUPP T R/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 56, 093. 00 350. 00 3, 750. 05 39. 23 3,750.05 50.96 0. 00 0.00 52, 342. 95 299. 04 6. 6 14. 5 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 J 64 65 56 67 68 69 70 71 72 13 54 55 56 7i 7 74 75 7J, 3 6 La 9 17 16 19 2U 21 2 ti 2 2 4.1 2 2 3 31 32 33 3 1413 3 37 438 39 4 40 41 42 93 44 45 47 40 49 50 51 52 1 53 57 1 • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 _v,_,_,uaa au.,rta,craa.n EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 09/17/90 16 07 OF YEAR_COMPLETE__ 0021 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL 6101_EAEKS FUND DEPT PARKS/RFC 12,500.0Q 770.00 3,500.00 50.0_00 1.32326 131. 52 38.93 0 00 0.00 1,130.00 6,41? 99 1.39_5_69 209.83 119.21 0._00 0.00 2.260.00 7.705 74 0 00 7.097 99 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 7.097 99 0_00 4.._O06_3? A7 9 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 431..MEMBERSHIP 560. 17 3,380.79 500.00 27.2 3.4 0 0 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 1: ECT SUBTOTAI 500.00 13, 560.00 07.773 00 500.00 11, 300.00 72.889_27 15,000_00 0.0 16.6 16 9 0 0 5400 EQUIPMENT ' 03 VEHLCLES 1 5,1?00_.OQ n 00 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3,000.00 18, 000.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 3,000.00 18, 000.00 0. 0 0.0 DIVISION TOTAL 327, 321.00 12, 752.83 20, 261.26 9,325.49 297, 734.25 9.0 8601 DEPARTMENT TOTAL CIP 86-601 OFPT• 327, 321.00 BI nGS s, rRfUN.pS 12, 752.83 20, 261.26 9,325.49 297, 734.25 9.0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT S _ • •0 0.00 488_00 488.00 488_00 488.00 n 00 0.00 488 00- 488. 00- 0 0 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DFPARTMFNT TOTAL 0.00 o On 10, 745, 741.00 488.00 4B8__00 891, 774.34 488.00 480 00 1.636, 629.53 0.00 0 no 51, 641.58 488.00- 488_00- 9, 057. 469.89 0.0 0 0 15.7 FUND TOTAL • f 5 6 7 6 9 10 12 1,1 15 19 70 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3, 32 33 34 35 J6 39 41 42 43 44 6 a9 0 32 3 A� i9 GO 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 66 59 70 71 72 73 74 75 J s J J J J J J J 0 CTTY OE_HERMOSA_DEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 (BY FUND) PAGE DATE 0022 09/17/90 YEARCOMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 16 07 OF ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 1229_BUDGELTRANSF_ER DEET 11QNIJSUER RT ` 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERA_T_IN_G_TRANSEERS OUT 22,1100 00 141933_31 :3, 666_.6A 0_00 184_333_34 16 6 n OBJECT SUBTOTAL 22, 000. 00 1, 833. 33 3, 666. 66 0. 00 18, 333. 34 16. 6 ' 7 DIVISION TOTAL 22, 000. 00 1, 833. 33 3, 666. 66 0. 00 18, 333. 34 16. 6 ° DEEARTMFNT TOTAL 22, 000_ no 1 R33 33 '3. AAA AA 0 00 18.:333 34 1F, f, ° 2601 STREET LIGHTING DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 78, 268. 00 • 5, 698. 86 10, 818. 84 0. 00 67, 449. 16 13. 8 •6 REGULAR nVFRTICIE 5QQ_00 0 00 68 AR 0 on 431_52 13 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1, 565. 00 0. 00 , 0. 00 0. 00 1, 565. 00 6 0. 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 565. 00 0. 00 '<' 0. 00 0. 00 1, 565. 00 0. 0 •112 PART TIMELIEMP'RARY 24.900 00 .. o 00 0_Q0 0_00 24.000.._00 0 0 4180 RETIREMENT 9, 815. 00 491. 79 491. 79 0. 00 9, 323. 21 5. 0 ' ' 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11, 454. 00 682. 57 1, 410. 86 0. 00 10, 043. 14 12. 3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 105. 167 00 A, R71 P2 12 7R9 97 0 00_______9_2._377 17 1 3 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • 1CONTRACI _SERVICE/ER151ATE 7, 100_QO 14 6'3 14...61 n.00 7, 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 10, 117. 00 332. 86- 332. 86- 085 37 0. 00 10, 449. 86 0 2 3. 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 217. 00 318. 23- 318. 23- 0. 00 17, 535. 23 1.e 4 4 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 175, 100. 00 13, 519. 18 13, 519. 18 0. 00 161, 580. 82 7. 7 5 304___TELEPtIONE 201 00 14 97 14 97 0 00 266 03 5 3 5 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 9, 500. 00 0. 00 9, 085. 34 4. 3 414. 66 414. 66 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 3, 410. 00 217. 45 339. 08 0. 00 3. 070, 92 9. 9 s • 11 AtlTO MAINTENANCE 44_020 00 103 37 103_27 0_00 3.826_6a 2. 5 4316 TRAINING 300. 00 ^. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 300. 00 0. 0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 8, 698. 00 725. 00 1, 450. 00 0. 00 7, 248. 00 16. 6 •BJECT- 1Bt TOTAL 201, 709 00 14. 994 Al 19,_841 7A n•__00. 1854_447_7_4 7 R fi fi nrVISrnN TrITAI 172.671 nn of 944 F7 oq '31'7 nn n nn V 9 '7Fn n0 l' 7 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 323, 673. 00 21, 549. 62 28, 313. 00 0. 00 295, 360. 00 8. 7 FUND TOTAL 345, 673. 00 23, 382. 95 31, 979. 66 0. 00 313, 693. 34 9. 2 Jj J 2 s 6 .110 0 0 12 3 4�.J s 00 . 9 9 .J 2 4 0 o, _ 2 3 s 6 ] 9 23 7 0 2 11 • L L 3 9 • 2 3 3 3 34 35 3G 37 38 39 41 42 43 45 46 47 48 49 53 5' 52 53 54 55 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 LIJ Qt Mtnl1USH_MtHCH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT FROM 08/01/90 TO (BY FUND) 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 0023 09/17/90 YEAR_COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE _16 07 OF UNENC BALANCE 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST 1295_RUDGE _I.RANSEEE DEPT: MGMTLS_UPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 15, 77J1-00 1, 31A_92 21_629_B4 0_00 13.149 16 16_A OBJECT SUBTOTAL 13, 149. 16 16. 6 15, 779. 00 1, 314. 92 2, 629. B4 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 15, 779. 00 1, 314. 92 2, 629. 84 0. 00 13, 149. 16 16. 6 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 15. 779 00 1.:314 92 2, 629 R4 0 00 11.149_16 16 6 3301 VEH PKG DIST DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 16, 454. 00 522. 55 809. 35 0. 00 15, 644. 65 4. 9 ' 11a_V9CATIDNLSLCK_EAY OFF :329`00 Q_00 0_00 0_.00 32900 0 0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 329.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 329.00 0.0' 4180 RETIREMENT 2, 063. 00 35. 97 35. 97 0. 00 2, 027. 03 1. 7 • 88 EMP_LOYEE.J3ENFFITS 1.254__00 19_40 19-00 0 00 1..215._00 3 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 429. 00 577. 92 884. 32 0. 00 19, 544. 68 4. 3 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 47, 000. 00 516. 63 1, 033. 26 0. 00 45, 966. 74 2. 1 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 47, 000. 00 516. 63 1, 033. 26 0. 00 45, 966. 74 2. 1 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 150. 00 20. 00 20.00 0.00 130. 00 13. 3 4305 OFFICE OBER-SUPPI1FS '3530 00 1 3R R R2 0 00 • 291 1R a 9 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 O. 0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 931. 00 78. 00 156. 00 0. 00 775. 00 16. 7 OILJECT SIIBTOTAI 2.3R1 00 9.9__3P 184.87 0 00 2 196.1R 7 7 5400 EQUIPMENT 542Q_0E-: _ 1 c - _ •• • •• . •• • •. ..5_00______11._0__.! OBJECT SUBTOTAL 265.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 265.00 0.0 5600J3UILDINGSLIMPROVEMENIS 5620 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS&IMPRV 2, 145. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 145. 00 O. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL , 2. 145. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 145. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 72, 220. 00 1, 193. 93 2, 102. 40 0. 00 70, 117. 60 2. 9 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 72, 220. 00 1, 193. 93 2, 102. 40 0. 00 70, 117. 60 2. 9 FUND TOTAL 87, 999 00 2, 508 85 4, 732 24 0. 00 R. 76A. 7F, 5 3 , 3 J 4 5 6 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 z5 26 z, 20 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 30 39 3 5 7 0 3 5 9 2 3 6 9 0 2 J J J J J J J r J J JI FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 . , 1 r it FarKPllJSA_1iEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0024 DATE 09/17/90 16 07 OF-YEAR_COMPLETF FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 110 PARKING FUND 129_9_BUDGEI_IRANSEER 0EPT MGMT/SUREORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OEERAIING_IRANSEERS OUT i, 314, 755 0n 110,772_5R 727.459_16 n On 1.087.,_295 84 17 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 314, 755.00 3 1, 087, 295.84 17.3 118, 729.58 227, 459.16 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL 1, 314, 755.00 118,729.58 227, 459.16 0.00 1, 087, 295.84 17.3 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1 114,791 00 1119.729 511 227 459 1A 0 00 1.087,29_5_84 17 3 3302 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 545, 487. 00 38, 315. 87 76, 839. 16 0. 00 468, 647. 84 14. 0 • •. ; QUI AR OVFRTTMF 10 000 00 969_ 11 1 A39_44 0 00 8....360._56 16 3 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 10, 909.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 10, 909.00 0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 10, 909. 00 1,761.57 " ' 2,201.09 0.00 8,707.91 20.1 ' 112_EARI_ILMELIEMEORARY 42..000_.0.0 8.134_36 1.7 108_16 0 00 24.891_84______40-7 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 5,500.00 4,944.63 10.0 294.79 555.37 0.00 4180 RETIREMENT 68, 404.00 4,721.22 4,721.22 0.00 63, 682.78 6.9 4187 UNLE0RMR 3. 600 00 - 342._16 473 48 224-38 2-905-1-4 19. 3 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 57, 642.00 4,851.43 9,585.44 0.00 48, 056.56 16.6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 754, 451.00 59, 390.71 . 113, 123.36 . 221.38 ' 641, 106.26 15.0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 6,000.00 356. 14 356. 14 0. 00 5,643.86 5. 9 ■ c 11RTrTAt 6.030 00 '19f• 14 356 14 0 00 5-643_86 86 5 9 • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TFI FPHONF 3..200_.00 60-; 19 7.9.9. 13 0._-00 2..500 87 24 2 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 35, 000.00 4,376.46 5,086.25 9,558.24 20, 355.51 41.8 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 3,500.00 628.00 628.00 0.00 2,872.00 17.9 '309 MAINIENANCF MATERIALS 15.D00_00 18 A'; i8_6'3 1.429 78 13,-552__09 9 6 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 6,600.00 850.42 1,452.20 0.00 5,147.80 22.0 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 12, 000.00 164.63 733.37 627.35 10, 639.28 11.3 4315_ 400.-00 0 00 0_00 0_00 400.-00 0_0 -MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 1,500.00 45. 12 140. 12 0. 00 1,359.88 9. 3 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.0 - _ - ■ - - • • -0q 00 7.606 nn 0 00 'i8,414.0_00 16 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL . 124, 446. 00 10, 489.41 16. 463. 70 11. 614. 87 96, 367. 43 22.5 400_EQUIPMFNT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 2,350.00 149. 44 149. 44 0. 00 2,200.56 6. 3 5403 VEHICLES 30, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 0 2 3 4 5 6 2 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 38 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 42 43 44 46 4a 9 1 s2 S3 sa s5 56 5]' 9 56 60 62 63 64 65 66 67 66 69 ]0 ]1 ]2 73 74 75 J .J a 1 .1 JP Jr .1 J J J 1 J J J 1 J FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 . ,✓ r ur_ntrtrIunn_Litnt,n EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0025 DATE 09/17/90 3 16 07 OF YEAR_COMP.LETE `' FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X a ] 110 PARKING FUND 10 3302_PARKSNG ENF 1)EPT aur_ AC1i TTTFG :u 12 13 5400 EQUIPMENT 14 " 15 5420_DEEREC.IA.LIONLEQU.IP&VEH 27.196-00 Q_00 0 00 0_00 27._L96_-00 18 3 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS 10, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 0 t 1.1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 69.546.00 149.44 149.44 0.00 10. 000. 00 69. 396.56 0. 0 0.2 16 19 20 156900 LEASE PAYMENTS 21 1] zz 16 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 3,500.00 114.40 228.80 0.00 3,271.20 6.5 23 • c C • _ - on 0n 1 14 40 22P._ An n n0 3.271.,-20 24 9 6. 5 25 20 26 27 21 5 ALLSION___S02A1 957,943_00 70._500__1.0 130.321 44 11,R16-25 815.785 31 14 8 26 22 2'] 23 30 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 957, 943.00 70, 500.10 130. 321.44 11, 836.25 815, 785.31 14.8 31 24 32 25 2. FUND TOTAL 2.272, 698.00 189. 229. 68 357, 780.60 11, 836. 25 1.903.081.15 16.234 33 2] 35 36 26 32 29 36 39 30 40 31 -91 32 .. 42 43 33 44 34 45 35 46 36 4] 48 3] a9 50 an 51 39 52 40 53 41 54 55 4256 43 57 44 58 50 45 45 61 62 °] 63 48 G4 49 65 66 67 51 52 69 53 ]O 71 5n ]2 55 3 56 ]4 5 .1 JP Jr .1 J J J 1 J J J 1 J C I-TY-OF-HERMOSA-REACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0026 TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 DATE 09/17/90 16. 07 OF -YEAR --COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 23 1, 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 12q -BUDGET ---TRANSFER -DEPT—MGMT/-SUP-RBRT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER •399_0P_ERAIING_TRANSFERS-OUT 1• V8O, 969.-D0 1116.74742 213.-494x84 O. 00---1.067 -47466 16. b OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 280, 969. 00 106, 747. 42 213. 494. 84 0. 00 1, 067, 474. 16 16. 6 in 5 6 9 ,0 11 ,2 13 ,4 15 16 ,7 18 DIVISION TOTAL 1, 280, 969.00 106, 747.42 213, 494.84 0.00 1, 067. 474.16 16.6 DEPARTMENT -TOTAL 1. 280.-969 -00 1-06. 747.42 213.-494,-84 0-00-1.-067, 474-16 16-6 FUND TOTAL 1. 280, 969. 00 106. 747. 42 213, 494. 84 0. 00 1, 067, 474. 16 16. 6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1:2 23 2n 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 28 20 30 38 39 40 41 31 32 33 42 43 44 34 35 36 37 46 47 n9 38 39 50 51 52 53 n0 41 42 54 55 56 43 nn n5 57 58 59 60 45 47 61 62 63 l.i 1`' 64 48 49 50 51 52 53 65 56 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 5n 56 J J 74 , I 27 2. `5 26 27 20 29 30 31 32 33 34 iI3 36 x'38 I 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49 5 5 5 . _ . r 3 ur ncr6 luJfi_ 3tML 1 FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 s 6 PAGE DATE 09/17/90 0027 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE 16 O% OF .YEAR_COMPLETE— UNENC BALANCE 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 1 299 BUDGELTRANSEER DESS_MGMT. SUERORT 7,903 42 2,903.42 5,806 84 5,806.84 0 00 0. 00 29. 03416 16. 6 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OEERATJNG_IRANSEERS_OUT 34L1141_O0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 34, 841. 00 29, 034. 16 16. 6 DIVISION TOTAL 34, 841. 00 DFPARTMENT Tf)TA1 34.841 00 2, 903. 42 7.90-4 42 2,903.42 5, 806. 84 5,4306_84 5,806.84 0. 00 n_00 0. 00 29, 034. 16 29.-034-16 29, 034. 16 16. 6 16_A 16. 6 FUND TOTAL 34, 841. 00 2 3 4 5 7 0 t2 13 14 15 16 16 19 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 32 ]3 34 35 ]6 37 38 39 40 42 43 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 2 53 54 55 56 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 tib 67 68 69 70 71 72 74 75 J J J J J J J J J J J J J 3 C -I -TY— OF--HERMOSA—BEACH FINANCE—FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0028 DATE 09/17/90 2 s 6 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE 16.0% OF-YEAR—COMPLETE UNENC BALANCE 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIESto 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEP�MGMT-/-SUPPORT' 10 12 3 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 APERAIING_1RANSEERS—OUT 380,-000.-00 270.-000.-00 280,000.-00 0.-00 0. 00 100,-000. z 13 4 ,4 5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 380, 000. 00 270, 000. 00 280, 000. 00 00 100, 000. 00 73. 6 73. 6 ,a t9 20 6 17 B DIVISION TOTAL 380, 000. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL '180..000. 00 270, 000. 00 270, 000.-00 270, 000. 00 280, 000. 00 280.-000.-00 280, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 100, 000. 00 73. 6 zz 23 24 19 20 2, FUND TOTAL 380, 000. 00 100,-000. 0€ 100, 000. 00 73. 6 73. 6 25 Z6 27 213 72 2.l 24 29 30 31 32 25 26 27 ...., .. 33 34 35 36 28 29 30 3] 39 39 40 31 32 .. -. 44 34 35 36 45 46 4] 48 3] 39 a9 SO 5 52 40 41 42 53 54 55 56 43 44 45 .. 5) 50 59 GO 46 47 48 61 62 63 64 49 50 51 .. .. 65 56 67 CA 52 53 54 60 70 71 72 5 3 75 6 9 10 11 u 3 15 16 18 19 yz0 21 '.2 y i 23 24 25 26 27 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 ur nmuJH_ut(utj EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 16 0029 09/17/90 YEAR.._COMPLEIE- FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE 07 OF UNENC BALANCE 126 UUT 8514 RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND CIP 89-514 DEPT* 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CD IBAOL_SERVICF/PRIVATF PARKS 34_200_00 3,200.00 617, 255.00 617, 255.00 0 00 0. 00 424, 551.60 424, 551.60 0_00 0. 00 424, 551.60 424, 551.60 0 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 -4,200 00 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 69(20_LEASE PAYMENTS 3,200.00 192. 703.40 192. 703.40 0. 0 68.7 68.7 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 620, 455.00 424, 551.60 424, 551.60 0.00 195, 903.40 68.4 DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUNn TnTAi 620, 455.00 620. 459 0n 424, 551.60 424, 551.60 42.4.4_554-60_____-4244'551.60 0.00 0.00 195, 903.40 68.4 1954-903-40------68=4 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 I9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 389 40 1 42 43 44 5 46 47 48 49 50 51 2 3 54 5G 57 se 59 GO 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 66 69 70 71 72 73 4 75 J J .J J J J J J I7.'I• 11 r`] r A 2 3 FINANCE—FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0030 2 TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 DATE 09/17/90 1-6 01 _OI — EEAR—COMRL—E-T- — s 6 6 6 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 8 6 9 127 67. UTILITY USER TAX FUND ,c 1299 RUD(:FT TRANSFFR DFPT• M(_MT/SI1PPf1PT �= 10 2 ,. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER '- 229.721 AA n no 1,128,_61.8_34 16_6 3 14 15 4399 QFE8ATINGIBAMSEEBS__QUT 1,154,7142 00 112,961_83 1, OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 354, 342.00 112, 861.83 225, 723.66 . 0.00 1, 128, 618.34 16.6 . 6 B DIVISION TOTAL 1, 354, 342.00 112,861.83 225, 723.66 0.00 1, 128, 618.34 16.6 ., 275A 0_00 1..428..618-34 16 6 19 20 21 nFPARTMENT TOTAL L,394.7442_00 112,261—B3 -723-6A FUND TOTAL . , 1, 354, 342.00 .. 112, 861.83 , '. 225, 723.66 0.00 1, 128, 618.34 16.6 22 23 24 25 . 26 27 28 29 30 32 33 4 35 36 37 38 J: 3, 40 41 42 43 1 44 45 46 47 40 49 51 52 53 54 r55 ' 56 ' 3 10 1 12 14 15 sl 1] 18 19 20 21 22 t 2,. 2'. 21 2E 2: 3[ 3t 32 33 34 36 37 `28 39 40 41 42 43 c 44 45 .15 4,, 47 40 49 4-9, 51 52 41 53 5.1 5 4. 55 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 16_0'4__0F 0031 09/17/90 .YEAR_COMP_LETE- FUND DIV ODJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR 4701 HOUSING_REHAR DFPT• OTHER 105,253 00 105, 255.00 0 00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0 00 0.00 105,-255 00 0 0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 42Q1_SDMTEACLSERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 105, 255.00 0.0 DIVISION TOTAL 4703 CDB( ADMIN DFPT• 105, 255.00 nTHFR 11.695_00 0.00 1.493_31 0.00 1,493_31 0.00 0__00 105, 255.00 10,201-69 0.0 12.7 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201_CONIRAC1_SERVICF/PRIVATF OBJECT SUBTOTAL 11, 695.00 1,493.31 1,493.31 0.00 10, 201.69 12.7 DIVISION TOTAL DFPARTMFNT TOTAI 11, 695.00 1 1 F1 950 00 116, 950.00 1,493.31 1.49'1 'll 1,493.31 1,493.31 1.49.3_3.1 1,493.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 10, 201.69 115.-456 69 12.7 1 2 FUND TOTAL 115, 456.69 1.2 a • 3 • 0 10 12 13 to 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2] 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 36 29 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 4] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 69 ]0 ]1 72 • • 1 1 J J :J J J J J /I 2 6 9 10 11 2 13 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 s.� s.,LncrtnumA_DEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 16 07 OF 0032 09/17/90 -YEAR. COMPLETE__ FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1299BUDGELTRANSFER T)EPT• MGM_LSUBRORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFFRS OUT n 00 n on n nn n on 0__00 0 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 DEPARTMFNT TOTAL 0 00 0 00 0 00-------0_00 0.CO 0 0 3401 DIAL A RIDE DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 16, 451.00 1,350.92 2,288.74 0.00 14, 162.26 13.9 4180 RETIREMENT 24.962 00 56 IR 56_1B 0 00 2 006_-82 2 7 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,542.00 116.97 235.00 0.00 1,307.00 15.2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 056. 00 1,524.07 2,579.92 0.00 17, 476. 08 12.8 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 133, 886.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 133, 886.00 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 122.RR6 00 0 00 0 00 n 00 123,_886_00 0 0 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 50_.00 8_32 8_37 0__00 41r6B 16 6 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 500.00 0.00 47.76 0. 00 452.24 9. 5 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 283.00 24.00 48.00 0.00 235.00 16.9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL R23 00 22 27 104 OR n 00 728 92 12 4 DIVIRTON TOTAL t511.779 on 1..%5A 34 2. FAR4 00 - n 00 152,-031.-00 1 7 3402 COMMUTER BUS DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 5,936.00 475.88 824.08 0.00 5,111.92 13.8 41RO_RE2_IREMENT 744_00 19_Q'. IQ_ O6 0_00 724_94 7 5 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 576.00 41.83 84.05 0.00 491.95 14.5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7,256.00 536. 77 927. 19 0. 00 6,328.81 12. 7 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 53, 000.00 8,146.00 8,146.00 0.00 44, 854.00 15.3 OBJECT sUBSOSAI 52.000 nn R.146 nn R. 146 nn n on 44,1E154_00 15 2 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 95 00 8 00 16 00 0 00 79 00 16 8 J J 6 7 9 12 IC is 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2G 27 26 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 46 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 59 0 61 62 63 64 65 56 67 68 70 72 73 7 75 L 3 4 5 5 9 tr y 11 1z •1. 5.. 13 15 2 2 2 2 27 .9 29 30 3 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4 4I 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 51 52 L., 53 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 7. EXPENDITURE FROM 08/01/90 1 1 3 ur_oC.nrival_mtACH SUMMARY REPORT TO 08/31/90 (BY FUND) PAGE 0033 DATE 09/17/90 16 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE 97 OF YEAR_COMP_LEIE_ UNENC BALANCE 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER DR.JECZS III9IAL 95 00 60, 351.00 R on 8,699-Z7 1 A on '6_089 19 n n0 0 nn 79 00 ib._B DIVISION TOTAL 5i. 26L_81 19 0 3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4159_BEIIRELIENT 1.631.00 205_90 240. 00 2,076.00 128.40 16_02 15. 67 160. 09 256.80 16_92 31. 46 304. 28 0.00 000 0. 00 ' 0. 00 1,374.20 15.7 188_98 7 8 208. 54 13. 1 1,771.72 14. 6 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 13, 650. 00 13,650 00 699 00 699. 00 556. 00 556 00 58_90 58.00 556. 00 556 on U6._.00 116.00 0. 00 0 nn 0._0.0 0. 00 13, 094. 00 4. 0 17.094 on 4 0 583 00 16_5 583. 00 16. 5 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TESFR 0UT-I.NS_USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 3408 c IM.UIER_XERESS DEPT: 16, 425. 00 PUDLIC TRANSIT 774. 09 0 00 0. 00 976. 28 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 15, 448. 72 5. 9 R._608 00 0 0 8,608.00 0. 0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 8,60E3.00 8,608.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8,608.00 240,159_00 240, 159.00 0.00 11.02125 11, 021.25 0.00 12.749 47 12, 749.47 0.00 0 00 0.00 8,608.00 0.0 227.409 53 5 3 227, 409.53 5.3 FUND TOTAL 5 7 B 10 „ 12 13 4 15 16 17 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 9 0 2 3 9 1 5 9 s1 s2 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 56 67 58 69 70 7, 72 /J 74 75 J i J ', J J J J 174 1 7SJ- -.-----•• .• .• • A 3 v_i_i_x_ur_mr-rimu=ft-Ja=ftur, FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0034 TIME 11:13:09 ..."..: . .:. . FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 ' DATE 09/17/90 i ' . - . .- •, 1.-6-.4r AR_COMPLEZE---: 4 s 6 6 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % 7 a s 8 9. 150 GRANT FUND .. _ - . . .. . • .• . . ". • . .,.. . , 12 1294 RIA00FT TRANSFFR IIPPT. MMMT/qUPP0RT 3 0 1216 14 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 15 4344 0PFRATING_IRANSEERS_OUT 114.595 00 77.460 00 RO.Sqn 00 0 00 '3...15O.-00 70 5 13 14 15 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 114, 585. 00 77, 460. 00 '. 80.835. 00 - -'. 0. 00 . 33. 750. 00 70. 5 18 , • 15 , . ' , . •., •• • • 21 6 17 ,8 DIVISION TOTAL 114, 585. 00 77, 460. 00 80, 835. 00 0. 00 33. 750. 00 70. 5 22 n 11,...5.85_00 77.460 00 R0.d7135 oo n_on 33,7-50_00 70 5 :N 2, 19 20 21 DFPARIIIENLSOTA1 26 . FUND TOTAL 114. 585. 00 . 77, 460. 00 ' ' ., .. 80. 835. 00 . .. , :, . 0. 00 - . . 33. 750. 00 70. 5 27 .1.1 :15 22 23 24 39 31 3,1 2) 31 28 29 30 3, I: 4n 32 33 , ..., • '.. •- 4 34 35 4 - 36 37 30 , • 39 40 . • 42 43 44 1 • 413 46 47 ' . . . set 49 . 51 52 . 53 . 58 . ' .1 J r 11, seW J J J 2J J -J J ' FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0035 TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 DATE 09/17/90 1 3 ° 5 16 07 .OF YEAR_COMPI FTF FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCEUNENC BALANCE % 6 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND 129�I3VDGET�RANS EER DEPT NONTJSUPPURT 10 12 10 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSfERS OUT 0.00 O. O0 0.00 Q_00 13 14 15 16 0 00 0_O 3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 14 15 - ;B 19 20 6 DIVISION TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 17 18 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0 00 n0 0 Q0 0 00 0^00 21 22 23 24 ,_.f1 o 0_0 20 2102 CROSSING GUARD DEPT: POLICE zl 25 26 21 26 22 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES `' 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 8, 892. 00 832.43 1, 639. 32 0. 00 7, 252. 68 18. 4 24 4110 VACATTfN/STCK PAY DFF 17R 00 0 00 0._00 0 00 20 301 32 178.-00 0r0 25 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 178.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 178.00 0.0 25 4113 CROSSING GUARDS 40, 408. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40, 408. 00 0. 0 ' 4180 -RETIREMENT 1. 11.5-00 104...48 101-18 0.-00 J3 34 35 36 28 1,-013 82 9 0 4187 UNIFORMS 400. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 400. 00 0. 0 9 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 816.00 66. 96 134.33 0.00 681.67 16.4 0 nn IFrT SI;Et TnTAI 51. 987 00 1. 000 97 1- R74T.83 0 00 90.-112 17 3 38 39 40 1 3.-6 32 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES . 33 4201-CONIRAC7 SERV_ICELP_R_LVATF 64-000_00 14-62 14._62 41 43 44 0-00 5,-985-38 0 2 a 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 525. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 525. 00 0. 0 J5 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 525. 00 14. 62 14. 62 0. 00 6, 510. 38 0. 2 6 45 qG 47 46 ' 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 38 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 2, 805. 00 234. 00 468. 00 0. 00 2, 337. 00 16. 6 9 0B iFrT SUIIIIIIAI 24-805.-00 21,7-00 468-00 0 2.-337-00 16`6 °' 50 51 52 -00 40 41 42 ❑TVTSTnN TOTAL 61. ,17 on 1. 449 19 a-357 45 0 00 584959_ 55 3 8 53 54 55 56 43 44 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 61, 317. 00 1, 249. 19 2, 357. 45 0. 00 58, 959. 55 3. 8 45 sI se 9 60 n6 FUND TOTAL 61, 317. 00 1, 249. 19 2, 357. 45 0. 00 58, 959. 55 3. 8 47 . 48 62 63 64 • 45 50 65 66 6) 66 52 5 3 %' 66 ]O n n 55 56 ' I ]3 ]4 ,5 7y seW J J J 2J J -J J 22 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4. 4` 4 4 4 5 5 5 63 3 45 6 7 a IS 12 I) 14 15 16 17 i9 21 22 23 24 26. 7 .s43' 34 35 -s6 37 351 331 C. 7; FINANCE -F.4454 • TIME 11:13:09 • ' - r LTOR_HERMOSA_BEArH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 (BY FUND) ..,, ' ,• , PAGE 0036 DATE 09/17/90 16.0% FUND DIV OBIT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE -0E -YEAR -COMPLETE UNENC BALANCE % 160 SEWER FUND . , _ • -- e 9 r.. T 0 PT. MGMT/SIWPORT . 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4329_08ERAIING_TRANSEERR (WIT 1.765.871 no 147.151 75 794303_50 n 00_ 1.471.517 50 16 6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 765, 821. 00 147, 151. 75 • • • 294, 303. 50 . . - • 0. 00 1, 471, 517. 50 16. 6 ' - DIVISION TOTAL 1, 765, 821. 00 147, 151. 75 294, 303. 50 0. 00 1, 471, 517. 50 16. 6 11FPARTMPNT TrITAI 1.765.1=171 00 147. 151 75 794 '10:1. 10 n 00 1. 47-1.-517.-50-16 6 ) 3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN •, • • DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN . • • • 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES • 4102 REGULAR SALAR IES/MISC 93, 575. 00 7, 261. 29 14, 470. 20 0. 00 79, 104. 80 15. 4 4106 RFGULAR_OVFRTIMF 34_000_00 0_00 94 22 0 00 2,905,.-78 3.4 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1. 872. 00 0. 0 1, 872. 00 • 0. 00 • - 0. 00 0. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN , 1, 872. 00, , 0. 00 • , - . •,, 0. 00 - • 0. 00 1, 872. 00 0. 0 4180 RFTTRFMFNT 11.734_ 00 . ' '• ' 766-55 76,4,. 55 0 00 1.0.967-45 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8, 555. 89 13. 7 9, 924. 00 719. 26 1, 368. 11 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 121, 977. 00 8, 747. 10 16, 699. 08 0. 00 105, 277. 92 13. 6 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES , ,' • ,. 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 2, 000. 00 0. 00 - ' 0. 00 -: - 0. 00 2, 000. 00 O. 0 - 4251 -CONTRACT SER-VICE.tGOVT 3.-100_00 0 00 •,•0. 00 3.-100.-00 (:) * OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 100. 00 0. 0 5, 100. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4100__MATERIALELS.118ELIEILITHER 4303 UTILITIES 515.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 515.00 0.0 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 10, 100. 00 567.37 663. 45 0. 00 9, 436. 55 6. 5 [ 4310_/10TOR_EUELS__AND_LUBFq 880_00 71_87 11,8_44. ,'• 711-. 56 19 1 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 6, 400. 00 0. 00 0. 00 .0_00 0. 00 6, 400. 00 0. 0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 26, 488. 00 2, 207. 00 4, 414. 00 0. 00 22, 074. 00 16. 6 onJEC_T_SUBTOTAL 44._383_00 2,4346 24 5,245 139 0 39, 137_11 11..8. 5400 EQUIPMENT •. _00 5402_EQUIRMEA,L1==RE-THAN-$500 • 800. 00 • 0. On o 00 0 00 soo_oo o_ 0 5403 VEHICLES 70, 000. 00 70, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 70, 800. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 70, 800. 00 0. 0 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS' 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 9, 070. 00 *. - ' 0. 00 ' . . 0. 00 • 0. 00 9, 070. 00 0. 0 oBJECT_SUBTOTAL R. 070_00 0 00 • ' 0 on n_on 9._070 0 0 • i _00 DIVISION Tnim 251'0_00 11. 593 34 219A4 97 0 00 229,-385 03 8 7 . , 3 45 6 7 a IS 12 I) 14 15 16 17 i9 21 22 23 24 26. 7 .s43' 34 35 -s6 37 351 331 C. 7; c c PF 6 rISY__OF HFRMOSA_BEACH 2 3 4 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 , EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 06/31/90 PAGE 0037 DATE 09/17/90 6 7 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE 16 074_0E -YEAR -COMPLETE UNENC BALANCE 'X 8 9 ,0 160 SEWER FUND nEPARTMFMT IOTA! DEPT: 25J.33000 SANITARY SEWER 11,593,34 21.944.97 0.00 r" 8406 CIP 88-406 229,-385,-03 - H4 15 16 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OB.IErT RUBTOTAr , , 0.00 0 00 • •0 '326.01 926-01 326 01 ' ' 326.01 ' 126-01 326-01 " 326. 01 0.00 0-00 0-00 0. 00 326.01- 0.0 326,-01 17 18 19 • • • • • • 4 326-01- t 20 21 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0. 00 326. 01 0.-0 326. 01- 0. 0 22 23 24 FUND TOTAL 2,017,151.00 159,071.10 316,574.48 0.00 1,700,576.52 15.6 3 25 26 27 , , 28 29 30 •. 31 32 33 , . 34 35 36 37 30 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 .70 • • r 49 50 . 'J2 53 54 I 55 56 ‘‘..! • i- FINANCE-FA454 414-K-Ut-t1tnnu. M-37CIM..4, EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0038 2 TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 ._ DATE 09/17/90 3 1Es -0:C--0R-YEAR-COMPLETE 4 6 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE .0 6 . 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND 9 1799 RUflf:FT TRANSFER DEPT• MGM T/SUPPORT ,° 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 2 4199 f1PFRATING-IRANSEERS_.OUT 0 00 A on 0 00 n On O.-00 0-0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 . . 0.00 0.0 , 15 1fi DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 17 B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 0 0 19 DEPARTMENT -TOTAL 20 2103 SPEC INVESTGTNS DEPT: POLICE 21 22 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 23 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 170, 604. 00 14, 342. 00 28, 684. 00 0. 00 141, 920. 00 16. 8 24 880.-00 0,-00 8.800.-00 16.6 25 4105_SPEC.1.IL_DUT-L-PAY 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 10.560.-00 24, 000. 00 -1-.-760,-00 3, 273. 00 7, 676. 70 0. 00 16, 323. 30 31.9 - 26 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3, 623. 00 2, 359. 80 2, 359. 80 0. 00 1, 263. 20 65. 1 27 0.00 _ 41.-880:98 20 4180-RET-I&E8ENT 46,-053;-00 2, 800. 00 4. 1-72-02 4. 172-02 233. 36 466. 72 0. 00 2, 333. 28 16. 6 29 4187 UNIFORMS 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14, 481. 00 1, 018. 84 11018. 84 0. 00 13, 462. 16 7. 0 30 02 46.-138.-0B 0 00 225.-982. 92 16.-9 31 OBJECT SUBTOTAL a72..-121--00 26.-279 32 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES . ' 31 SERV-ICEI-8R-I-VATE 6.-425-00 600-00 894.90 0.00 5,530-50 13-9 34 4201-CONIRACT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 425. 00 600. 00 894. 50 0. 00 5, 530. 50 13. 9 35 36 S/St1PPi 3' 4-100_ ATER1A! LES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 7, 680. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 680. 00 0. 0 30 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 6, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 000. 00 0. 0 39 1. 150-00 0,-00 '3.850.-00 23.0 40 4322-UNCLASSIF-IED 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 5,-000-00 13, 496. 00 0-00 1, 125. 00 2, 250. 00 0. 00 .3 . ' 11, 246. 00 16. 6 41 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 32, 176. 00 1, 125. 00 3, 400. 00 0. 00 28, 776. 00 10. 5 42 43 44 5400 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 '. 5, 030. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5, 030. 00 0. 0 'I 45 5401 EQUIPMENT 0. 00 0. 00 0-00 20.-300-00 0. 0 46 5403-VEIUI-CLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20.-300-00 25, 330. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 25, 330. 00 0. 0 4] C9 DIVISION TOTAL 336, 052. 00 28, 004. 02 50,, 432. 58 0. 00 285, 619. 42 15.0 50 285, 619.-42 15. 0 5' DEPARTMENT -TOTAL 0. 00 336.-052.--00 28.-004.-02 50.-432.-58 52 53 FUND TOTAL 336, 052. 00 28, 004. 02 , 50, 432. 58 .0. 00 285, 619. 42 15. 0 54 56 3 5 6 2 i3 14 15 16 19 54 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 , . LL— Ut_tltlIMUSAJitALH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0039 DATE 09/17/90 16_0/ OF YEAR FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE -COMPLETE UNENC BALANCE 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND '2O2__)-1YDRANT UPGRADE DEPT• FLRF 100. nnn on 19.254.^4() 15,_254_40 "'.573_-00 82.-172 60 17.8 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • 01—C_ONIRACZSER..LLCE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 100, 000.00 15, 254.40 15, 254.40 2,573.00 82, 172.60 17.8 DIVISION TOTAL DFPARTMFNT Tf]TAl 100, 000.00 1 On. non 00 15, 254.40 15.254 40 13, 254. 40 15, 254.40 15,_25-440 15. 254. 40 2,573.00 2.57-4,00 2,573.00 82, 172.60 17.8 82.-172-60 17,-8 82. 172. 60 17. 8 FUND TOTAL 100, 000. 00 ..5 2 5 6 i 6 9 10 12 13 la 15 16 1] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 e. J J J � n a 45 46 47 ..0 413 49 50 51 52 53 54 ss 56 57 58 59 J 60 61 62 63 J 64 65 66 67 J 56 69 70 71 J 72 ,3 74 ,s '"7 z 1.-' 17 1 1--rit.I(V L 4--1 M' FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0040 DATE 09/17/90 -1\ z 3 �,0 5 < -OF-YEAR-COMRLE�E 6 5 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7.. ' 6 0 ' 0 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 9 3° 9 8137 C 10 IP 85-1'37 DEPS'= -STREE SAF -ET -Y 14 " 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 15 'z 4201-CONSRACT G ERIIICELER I VATF 505. 841x00 O. On 2 00 _ O. 00 505. 841. 00 O O 3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 505, 841. 00 505, 841. 00 0. 0 10 0. 00 0. 00 . 0. 00 zi 6 DIVISION TOTAL 505, 841. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 505, 841. 00 0. 0 22 17 23 B R141 riP R9-141 11EPT:STREET-SAFET-Y z4 z. 19 26 20 z' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • • +O 1-29 75 ' `,.' zz 42Q1-Cf1NTRAf T RER.1/_LCE. 2RL.VATE 1 �9. 750. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 129, 750. 00 O. O• • • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 129, 750. 00 -0. 0 - 23 31 24 32 25 DIVISION TOTAL 129, 750. 00 0. 00 : 0. 00 0. 00 129, 750. 00 0. 0 : 33 34 27 R147 rTP R9-142 fFPT' STREFT/RAFFTY - "• ; 20 2° 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES '' 3O 'i4, 0x00 O. 00 34. 542. 00 Q.-0 31 4201 CONSRACI�EBSIICF/PR t VATF 5.42 0O OBJECT SUBTOTAL 34, 542. 00 O 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 34, 542. 00 0. 0 . 32 •3 33 34 DIVISION TOTAL 34, 542. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 34, 542. 00 0. 0 ,. 35 41' 36 R144 C.Tp 9Q-144 T)FPT• STRFFT/SAFETY - 37 L 30 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES - 35 446._000. 00 A. 00 AL 00 0 00 446.-000.-00 0 0 4O 4201__CONTRACT SERVI-CF/PRIVATF OBJECT SUBTOTAL 446, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 446, 000. 00 0. 0 41 4z ;: 43 DIVISION TOTAL 446, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 446, 000. 00 0. 0 45 fFPT_ STRFFT/SAFFTY 46 R14h-C_IP R9 -14A 4' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 7. 300 00 O O „4 m 4201_CONTRACT SERVICE/PRLVATF 30(L OD O X14 0x00 O 00 _ 49 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 300. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7''00. ^0 0. 0 50 Iw 5 i 4300_r1ATER I ALS /SUPELI ES/STHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2, 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 700. 00 0. 0 ;. sz 53 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 700. 00 0. 0 54 t 56 �7 . J .1 •1. 51. J. * 2 2 2 2 2 13 51. y 3 3 3 3 3 3 41 42 4 4 49 90 51 L 53 55 L 55 L'? .J J J J J FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 C rTY_DF__HERMOSA_BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT FROM 08/01/90 TO (13Y FUND) 08/31/90 PACE DATE 0041 09/17/90 3 4 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 16 07 OF_YEA(ZCOMPLE_TE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % s 7 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 6 9 10 n1 V I S I ON TOTAL to. 000 on 0 00 0 00 0^00 10. 000._00 0 0 12 3 2 8148 CIP 89-148 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 5 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ;` 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 10, 000. 00 O. 00 0. 16 OBJECT SUB102AL 10, 000 00 n_on 00 0 n 0. 00 10, 000.00 0 00 10,-000-00 0. 0 0-0 10 20 7 21 B DIVISION TOTAL 1n.CQn nn n QO 0 00 0 00 10000-00 0 n 22 23 24 25 8150 CIP 89-150 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY zb 29 2 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES, 29 2 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 20, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1113.1FCT 91113TOTAI 20.000 00 0 00 0 00 20, 000. 00 0 00 20.-00000 0. 0 330 32 0.0 33 34 35 9 DIVISION TOTAL 70._00C) 00 0 00 0._00 0-00_20.-000,-00 0.-0 36 3) 8151 CIP 89-151 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 35 3 39 40 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 40, 500. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0.00 40, 500. 00 0. 0 42 43 fB,1FCT SUBTOTAL 40._5OD_ 00 n 00 0__00 0 00 40._500-00 40 0. 0 4s 46 47 DIVISION TOTAL 40.500 00 0 00 0 on 0 on 40,500 46 00 0 0 49 8170 CIP 87-170 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY50 51 52 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 53 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 337, 219. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 337, 219. 00 0. 0 s555 OBJECT SUBTOTAL '3'17,719 00 0 00 0 00 n 00 37. 212 56 QO 0 0 57 56 59 D T V T 9.LON-TOTAL 337. Pig 00 0 00 0,00- 0-00 337.-21-9,-00 60 _ 0--0 61 fit DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 533, 852. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 533, 852. 00 0. 0 63 64 8201 CIP 85-201 DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 6' 66 6] 4200-CONTRACLSERV1 CER 66 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 22, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 22, 000. 00 69 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 22, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 22, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 0 ,o 71 )4 49 90 51 L 53 55 L 55 L'? .J J J J J - - : - - - - - - 2 3 6 7 8 9 12 15 16 18 n0 70 21 22 23 24 26 20 30 31 32 33 34 33 36 37 33 35 41 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 .•-....-4-.--....4.11,--.4 11..••• -41.0.11,--1. GP1144.1 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 , PAGE 0042 DATE 09/17/90 16.0% OF FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE -YEAR -COMPLETE UNENC BALANCE 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND nivrsmtv TOTAL 22. 000 On • 0 00 0. 00 n, 00 0. 00 n, nO 0. 00 22-,-000,00 O. 0 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 22, 000. 00 22, 000. 00 0. 0 8406 CIP 88-406 DEPT: 4700 CONTRACT SFRVICFF SANITARY SEWER 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 920, 163. 00 1, 920, 163. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 920, 163. 00 0. 0 1, 920, 163. 00 0. 0 DIVISION. TOTAL 1, 920. 163. 00 0.00 • 0. 00 , . 0. 00 1, 920, 163. 00 0. 0 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 13511A CTP REL,5_06 nFPT• 1, 920, 163. 00 PARKC '30.00n on 30, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 0. 00 • . 0. 00 . 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 920, 163. 00 0. 0 . 30.-000,-00 0.0 30, 000. 00 0. 0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT cFRvLcF /PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 FaiLIPMFNT 5402 EGUIPMENT-MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 030. 92 1, 030.'92 1, 030. 92- 0. 0 1, 030. 92- 0. 0 - DIVISION TOTAL 30, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 030. 92 28, 969. 08 3. 4 8508 CIP 87-508 DEPT: 4700_C_OLNIIRAr T qFRVT ['FS PARKS 25, 000. 00 25, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2e, 000. 00 0. 0 25, 000. 00 0. 0 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL ' 25, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 25, 000. 00 0. 0 8511 CIP 90-511 DEPT: 4200_CONTRACT_SERVICEq PARKS 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 • 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 15, 000. 00 0. 0 15, 000. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 15,000. 00 0. 00 / 0. 00 0,00 15, 000. 00 0. 0 c 4 2 3 6 7 8 9 12 15 16 18 n0 70 21 22 23 24 26 20 30 31 32 33 34 33 36 37 33 35 41 2, 2 TIME 11:13:09 1._ FINANCE-FA454 i.,..i_i_L_ur_dttillubA_ISLAUJ-1 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT FROM 08/01/90 TO (BY FUND) 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 0043 09/17/90 YEAR_COMPLETE___ X FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE 16 07 OF UNENC BALANCE 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 8512_QIE__89=5.12 PERT2PARS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERYIG8128.1YATE 51._256_00 0 0.0 0 00 0 00 51...256 00 0 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 51,256.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,256.00 0.0 DIVISION TOTAL 51,256.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,256.00 0.0 :- 3 CIP 89-513 DEPT. PARKS 5500 LAND 501_LAND 260..000_00 0 00 0_00 0 00 260.000_00 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 260,000.00 260,000.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL 260,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 260,000.00 0.6 851A CTP 82=516 0FPT. PARKc 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 COUTRACT_SERVICE/PRIVATE 7.958_00 0 00 0 00 0._.00 7.958_00 0_0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7,958.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,958.00 0.0 DIVISION TOTAL 7,958.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,958.00 0.0 8517 CIP 89-517 DEPT. PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ' 4201 CONTRACI_SERVIcE/PRivATP 2..166_0n n 00 n 00 0_00 2.-566 00 0 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,566.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,566.00 0.0 ! a41:211._EQ11IEMENT 5402 EGUIPMENT-MORE THAN $500 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,565.44 2,565.44- 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,565.44 2,565.44- 0.0 DIVISION TOTAL . 2,566.00 0.00 0.00 2,565.44 0.56 99.9 , 8518 CIP 89-518 DEPT: PARKS ( 4200_CONTRACI_SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 12,305.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,305.00 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12,305.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,305.00 0.0 , 30 31 33 34 3 3 37 38 39 40 42 .45 47 46 49 50 51 52 53 8 9 50 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 29 30 32 33 34 35 6 38 39 0 42 3 5 46 77 08 9 1 2 3 54 55 56 58 2 3 5 6 8 0 2 5 ._J _J r. 3. . - _J -.J 5-1 r r- e- r r - r 4 FINANCE-FA454 CITY OF _3 HERMOSAEACH z EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0044 TIME 11:13:09 FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 3 •_ _ - - DATE 09/ 17/90 4 16_0Z nF YFAR-C■ .. ' 5 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 6 APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 8518 CTP R9 -51R w WEPT• P <<`5400 EQUIPMENT 12 ] 54.02_E91t1PMFNT-MORE AN $500 00 0 TH 00 n 00 12 105 7n 12.-305.73- 0 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 12, 305. 73 12, 305. 73- 0. 0 4 15 6 DIVISION TOTAL 12, 305. 00 0. 00 0. 00 12, 305. 73 0. 73- 100. 0 s DEPARTMFNT TOTAL 404. OR5_O.O 0__00 n 00 19 902_09 1P18.._182_9_1 3 9 • ° 8601 CIP 86-601 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 2 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.0 nBJECT SUBTOTAL 4 000 00 0 00 n on n 00 4.000_00 n n 6 - 3 nlvISTnN TnTAI 4.000 00 n nn n 00 n n. • ••• •• • • 6604 CIP 86-604 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 3 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 23, 768. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 00 23, 768. 00 0.0 fI3.1FCT SUATIITAL 23.7F.R 00 0 00 0 00 n 00 23,168._00 • • DIVLS1LN TOTAL 23,268. 00 0.00 0 00 0 00 21..76B 00 0 0 8606 CIP 87-606 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 8,164.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8,164.00 0. 0 DII.JECT SUBTOTAL 8,161_00 G-00 0 00 0 00 R. 164_..0.0 0 Q T)IVT.SION TOTAI R. 1A4_On 0 on n on 0 on R.1A4_Qfl n 0 , 8609 CIP 89-609 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS c 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 30, 000.00 0.00 .0.00 0.00 30, 000.00 0.0 nBJEC2-SUBTOTAI 30000 00 0 00 n 00 n n0 30.000 00 0 0 DIV ISION TOIAL 3Q„.o00.._90 0 00 0 00 0_00 10,QQ0_00. 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5, 5 55 56 57 3 4 6 9 10 i2 ,3 ,5 ,6 7 6 9 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5, 5 55 56 57 3 4 6 9 10 i2 ,3 ,5 ,6 7 6 9 5 2 i 3 8 9 1.1 2f FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 5 ,. i 1 T_UC_L7tI1['1uJ f J3tfil.F1 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE 0045 DATE 09/17/90 16 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE 07 OF YEAR-COMPLET!^_ UNENC BALANCE X. 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 861.3._CIP 89-615 T1FPT• RI I1GS R (ROUNDS 10,_000 00 10. 000. 00 0 00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 0_00 0. 00 10.000._00 0 0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 420LCONIRACT SERVICE/PRIVATF OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 000. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 8616 CIP 90-616 OFPT• 10, 000. 00 RI DP,S P. (ROUNDS 45000.00 45, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 10, 000.00 0. 0 45.-000...00 0 0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 42.0LCONIRAC.LSERVICE/PR 1 VATF OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 45, 000. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL D=PARTMENT TOTAL 45, 000. 00 120.432_90 OTHER PROJECTS 0. 00 0. 00 n on n On 0. 00 n 00 45, 000. 00 0. 0 120,932 00 O 0 8701 CIP 89-701 DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0B.1FCT SUBTOTAL 15,000.00 15.000 00 15, 000 00 '0.00 0.00 0 00 n n0 0 00 0 00 0.00 0 on 0 00 15.000.00 O.0 15.000_00 0 0 15. 000 00 0 0 DIVISION TOTAI DEPARTMENT TOTAL 15, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 15, 000.00 O. 0 FUND TOTAL 4, 016, 032. 00 O. 00 O. 00 15, 902. 09 4, 000, 129. 91 0. 3 3 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 16 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 21 28 29 30 JI 2 32 2 33 2.• 4 35 2' 36 37 I2 39 3 31 7 32 43 3 34 46 3_ a1 3 3, 49 s1 39 52 4 53 54 °1 55 42 57 56 43 58 44 59 45 60 46 62 b.% 41 63 40 64 65 49 66 50 61 51 52 J 53 5 15.1 72 J J J J J J J J J J GLI 69 10 11 ✓ 72 ,3 14 75 ✓ r. 3. .�7 ✓ I2 r 5 6 8 9 I1 � 1 1 2C 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 E- 32 33 34 35 36 37 /- 38 39 40 r' 41 42 43 r as 45 46 47 49 p.. 50 51 52 5 8 9 10 II 3 14 16 1] 18 15 22 23 24 25 30 33 34 37 12 43 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 11:13:09 rIiv nF HERMOSA_BEACN EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/90 TO 08/31/90 PAGE DATE 0046 09/17/90 R-COMPLETE- FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE 16 -07 -0E -YEA UNENC BALANCE 705 INSURANCE FUND 1209 I TAll TI TTY TNS TIPPT• 1.1614T/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES • 42.REGULAR_SALARSEG/MISC 71 244 on 1 481 7R 2 99A A9 n nn 20.64Z._35 11 1 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 465.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 465.00 0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 465. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 465.00 0.0 . ° • : : hl • - .0 191 23 191 23 0 00 2. 72'1 77 6 5 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3, 444. 00 166. 80 291. 88 0. 00 3, 152. 12 8. 4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30, 533. 00 1, 839. 81 3, 079. 76 0. 00 27, 453. 24 10. 0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 347, 937. 00 884. 98 ; 284, 642. 73 0. 00 63, 294. 27 81. 8 • c tIRTOTAL 347 93Z, -0O 884--98---284,-642-73- 0.-00 63. 294.--27 81. 8 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305-OEEICE-OPFR SURELIEG 500_00 2-40 -2-46 n_00 427,-54 0 4 4315 MEMBERSHIP 365.00 35.00 35.00 0.00 330.00 9. 5 4316 TRAINING 275.00 0.00 47.00 0.00 228.00 17.0 4 CI AIMG/SETTI EMFNTS 50. 000 no 5. 623 56 g. A23-56 O. 00 444-376-44 11- 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 51, 140. 00 11. 1 5, 660. 96 5, 708. 02 0. 00 45, 431. 98 DIVISION TOTAL 429, 610. 00 8, 385. 75 293, 430. 51 0. 00 136, 179. 49 68. 3 _ 121n AUTO/PROP/ROM S DEP T• MGMTGSI 1PPOPT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICELERTVATF 354811 n0 17. qp2 07 2a 057. 07 0 00 13.-422 93 62 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 35, 480. 00 17, 322. 07 22, 057. 07 0. 00 13, 422. 93 - 62. 1 •300-MATERIALSISUR-P-LIESLOTHEB 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS 10, 000. 00 344. 51 1, 086. 74- 694. 89 • 10, 391. 85 3. 9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 000. 00 344. 51 1, 086. 74- - 694. 89 10, 391. 85 3. 9 DIVISION TOTAL 45, 480. 00 17, 666. 58 20, 970. 33 694. 89 23, 814. 78 47. 6 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL -SERVICES 4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 7, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 000. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 000. 00 0. 00 . O. 00 0. 00 7, 000. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 7, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1 0. 00 7, 000. 00 0. 0 •, .11 8 9 10 II 3 14 16 1] 18 15 22 23 24 25 30 33 34 37 12 43 J• ..l." J J J' J. J J. .. ` 2 2• 2 2 3 3 3. 3 3 3 33 4C 41 42 43 44 4•i 3 FINANCE-FA4 54 TIME 11:13:09 cuY_DELHERMOSA_BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT FROM 08/01/90 TO (BY FUND) 08/31/90 PAGE 0047 DATE 09/17/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 16 07 OF YEAR_..,COMPLE-TE- ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 705 INSURANCE FUND 121Z_WORKERS COMP WEPT MGMT/SURPORT 79,648 00 7,011 4R 0.00 0.00 75Z_90 17, 488.78 315.65 70. 075 R1 12, 406.34 • 1.637 .47 0.00 0. 00 752_90 17, 488.78 586. 57 71.965 R7 13,2739 68 0 00 PA 01_5_38 12 2 0.00 593.00 0.0 0. 00 593. 00 0. 0 0 00 1.460.10 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102_REGULAR_SALARIESLMISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 418Q_RESIREMENT 593.00 593.00 1. 71800 4182 WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Ig,IECT SUBTOTAL "202. 000.00 5,784.00 242, 336_0-0 6.-9 0.00 184, 511.22 8.6 0. 00 5,197.43 10. 1 0l00 720..320^13 4.-0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201_CONTRACI_SERVLICE/P_RLVATF 32,100_00 32, 100. 00 200.00 1,220.00 t.420 00 275.1/5A 00 0_00 18.360.32. 42 8 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATFR IAL S/S)IPPI TFSLOTHFR 12, 406. 34 81.94 266.88 348.-82 '12.8'10 q7 13. 739. 68 192.88 266.88 459_76 1A.IA5 91 0. 00 18, 360. 32 42. 8 0.00 7. 12 96.4 0.00 953" 12 21.8 4_00 960,-24 32-3 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING OR.IFCT SUBSO_tAJ orvrcrON TOTAI 0 00 739.690.x69 13 1 1218 MEDICARE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJFCT SUBTrITAL 39, 333.00 19.31'1 00 3,301.74 '4,'101 74 6,624.66 .4..424 AA 6,-624.-66 357, 190. 81 0.00 32, 708.34 16.8 0 00 32,._208'34 16 8 0.00 12,708-34 16-8 694. 89 439. 393. 30 44. 8 n r V r S ■ . ■ • - • • 797. 279. 00 0.1.^74 62. 185. 04 DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL RFPORI _IQIAI S 797. 279. 00 24, 97.7.9�. 243 00 62, 185. 04 P.----47-9. 698_40 357, 190. 81 4. 01.2,-586x47 . 694. 89 439, 393. 30 44. 8 82,647_81_20-822-008_72_16 .4 E 49 50 52 •5.3 54 55 54 5 ,3 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 z1 22 23 z4 26 2 r0 9 30 1 2 3 34 5 6 17 9 3 6 6 9 0 1 5 6 8 9 2 3 7 8 9 5 J J J J CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - AUGUST 1990 FUND GENERAL NUMBER ACCOUNT 8/1/90 BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 001 $2,483,647.42 105 1,414,881.80 109 3,772.61 110 317,843.85 115 924,076.79 120 30,798.73 125 1,907,548.88 126 737,079.24 127 29,161.67 140 127,459.25 145 347,024.21 150 97,011.43 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 63,295.86 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 1,943,919.03 170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE <125,335.13> 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 292,543.49 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 299,206.08 705 SELF INSURANCE FUND 255,300.69 $11,149,235.90 TRUST ACCOUNTS GENERAL LIGHTING DISTRICT VEHICLE PARKING DIST. PARKING STATE GAS TAX COUNTY GAS TAX PARK REC.FAC.TAX RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 6% UTILITY USERS TAX CDBG PROPOSITION A FUND GRANT FUND $1,007,863.78 5,918.39 13,397.88 271,117.31 49,968.90 - 0- 34,320.00 67,887.34 101,831.01 - 0- 15,863.00 - 0- 1,326.41 2,718.21 90,934.66 22,179.24 - 0- 694.89 $1,686,021.02 $ 284,065.07 37,495.27 2,541.78 8,909.99 25,290.41 861.73 57,446.88 - 0- 1,124.62 - 0- 10,222.87 - 0- 1,809.60 119,006.94 190,112.95 8,208.99 726,498.77 66,440.00 $1,540,035.87 $829,728.28 26,286.22 878.80 86,088.57 - 0- - 0- - 0- 424,551.60 - 0- 1,493.31 35,970.33 13,377.65 6,156.96 48,318.89 26,811.42 15,254.40 - 0- 62,118.02 $1,577,034.45 $ 611,235.01 2,775.78 1,394.30 198,824.01 111,747.42 2,903.42 270,000.00 -0- 112,861.83 - 0- 90.00 77,460.00 2,007.85 149,432.62 1,125.00 - 0- - 0- 21.84 $1,541,879.08 8/31/90 BALANCE $ 2,334,612.98 1,429,233.46 17,439.17 312,958.57 887,588.68 28,757.04 1,729,315.76 380,414.98 19,255.47 125,965.94 337,049.75 6,173.78 58,267.06 1,867,892.67 127,776.06 307,677.32 1,025,704.85 260,29 .72 $11,256,379.26 BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE STATEMENT BALANCE PAYROLL $10,294,203.99 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $3,170.84 $336,188.77 $527,616.12 INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL AGENT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY $226,611.35 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE $614,090.16 $614,182.64 �� C' GARY BRUTS�CH, CI Y TREASURER SEPTEMBER 19, 1990 $3,078.36 GENERAL $ PAYROLL OUTSTANDING CHECKS INACTIVE DEPOSIT BALANCE 815,366.78 5,252.31 820,619.09 191,554.23 629,064.86 10,630,392.76 11,259,457.62 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL September 17, 1990 Regular Meeting of September 25, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #21325 (C.U.P. CON NO. 89-17) LOCATION: 1301 CYPRESS AVENUE APPLICANT(S): SF PROPERTIES/OLGUIN RUTHERFORD DEV. REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A 3 - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #21325 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #21325 at their September 5, 1989 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: //2 Michael Schubach Planning Director Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager T/srfinmap Respectfully submitted, )7d?Ro ertson Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 -10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #21325 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1301 CYPRESS AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on September 25, 1990 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 89-67 adop- ted after public hearing on September 5, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 -10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #21325 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 16, Tract 780, as recorded in Book 16, Page 41 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los An- geles, for a three -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 1301 Cypress Avenue, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 25th day of September, 1990. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Cf T/rsfinmap PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL September 17, 1990 Regular Meeting of September 25, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #21198 (C.U.P. CON NO. 89-16) LOCATION: 801 BARD STREET APPLICANT(S): SF PROPERTIES/OLGUIN RUTHERFORD DEV. REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A 3 - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #21198 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #21198 at their August 15, 1989 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: Michael Sd ubach Planning Director T/srfinmap Respectfully submitted, 'en Robertson Associate Planner if 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #21198 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 801 BARD STREET, HERMO- SA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on September 25, 1990 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) -of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 89-60 adop- ted after public hearing on August 15, 1989. NOW,. THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map ##21198 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of the easterly 62.50 feet of Lots 8 and 9, Block T, Tract 2002, as recorded in Book 22, Pages 154 and 155 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a three -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 801 Bard Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 25th day of September, 1990. ATTEST: T/rsfinmap PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 C September 17, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 25, 1990 RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD BID FOR AIR CONDITIONING FOR THE JAIL AND COMPUTER ROOM IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council award the bid to Rusher Air Conditioning. BACKGROUND: COMPUTER ROOM In early 1989, the equipment room that houses the computer, 911, and communications equipment for the Police Department was remodeled and expanded. At that time, money was budgeted in the Capitol Improvements budget to upgrade and increase the air conditioning of the room. The upgrade was necessary because the unit in place was over 15 years old, was undersize for the heat load of the room, was experiencing frequent breakdowns, and was constantly icing up because of the overload being placed on it. In a cost saving attempt, some modifications were made to the existing unit. However, the problems continued and efforts to replace the unit were resumed. Plans to merge the police computer room and the general services computer room were discussed and everything was placed on hold pending a determination of the feasibility. After several months and several meetings it was decided that it would require some major expense and modification to the basement in order to accomplish a merger of the two rooms into one. During this time, the air conditioning unit continued to freeze up and cause problems. Air conditioning is critical for the proper performance and operation of the computer and communications equipment. When the air conditioning goes down, it only takes about 10 minutes for the temperature in the room to exceed 80 degrees. As the temperature rises higher, we must take the computers off line and shut them down in order to save the components and tapes from damage. 1 g The 911 computer and the radio banks begin to overheat and slow down. It takes approximately 2 to 3 hours to de-ice the air conditioning and get it back on line. The de-icing is done with a blow dryer to speed up the process, of course this adds more heat to the room. JAIL Air conditioning for the jail area has been a concern for about the same length of time as that of the computer room. Jail employees began bringing the concern to management's attention in late 1988. Like the computer room, air conditioning was requested for the jail in the last two budgets. In May of 1989, a grievance was filed by the jail employees because of the heat in the jail and their concern for prisoner safety and their own comfort. In November of 1989, the County of Los Angeles Grand Jury came to inspect our jail facility as part of their regular duties. The Grand Jury identified the fact that we did not have adequate air conditioning in the jail as a problem that needed to be corrected. ANALYSIS: Staff obtained bids for the air conditioning of the computer room and the jail in early 1990 and sought approval for the work. After review by the City Attorney, it was decided that the project came under a public works guideline and would need to be formally bid. Request for proposals were advertised and posted on July 15, 1990 and were published in the Easy Reader on July 19 and 26, 1990. Formal bid openings were held on August 2, 1990. There were three bids as follows: Airflow Corp. $5,500. Rusher Air Conditioning 9,990. Los Angeles Air Conditioning 31,411. Airflow Corp. formally withdrew their bid after conducting a walk- through to inspect the job site stating that they could not meet the requirements for the work at their bid. 2 Representatives from Rusher Air Conditioning conducted a walk through and indicated that they could do the work as specified. Since they are now the low bidder meeting all requirements and specifications, it is staff recommendation that the bid be awarded to Rusher Air conditioning for $9,900. Concur: Kevin B. Nort / raft City Manager Ton•' tich Director of Pub is Works Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director 3 R ubmitted, a/1/lLi Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety 40. September 13, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council September 25, 1990 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SIDEWALK SALE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council approve the request from the Chamber of Commerce to hold a sidewalk sale in the downtown business district on October 12 - 13 subject to the conditions listed in the analysis below. BACKGROUND Attached is a request from Executive Director, Wesley Bush, asking for approval for the activity. As indicated in the letter, they hope to plan more of these sales as a tie in to the already successful Farmers' Market. ANALYSIS Staff recommends approval for the event from the hours of 10 A.M. to 5 P.M. each day subject to the following conditions: • That at least a 4 ft. pathway remain clear at all times on the sidewalks and between obstructions to insure pedestrian and wheelchair access and safety. • That the sidewalk display areas be returned to a clean and orderly state following each sale day. • That the Chamber of Commerce provide the City with an. indemnity clause holding the City harmless from any claims that may arise as a result of the activity. At the conclusion of the first sale, it will be possible for staff to address any additional concerns that may arise as a result of the activity so that future sales of this kind can run smoothly from a City standpoint. It has been a Council objective to "take a more active role with the Chamber" (under goal # 7 - upgrade downtown). The sidewalk sale provides another opportunity for Council to support the Chamber's own efforts to improve business in the downtown area. • , Resp- e lly Submitted, Anbtrbny Antich, Dire tor Public Works Departent Mar, C -"Rooney, Director De't. of Community Resources lh HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 September 14, 1990 Mary Rooney, Director Community Resources Dept. City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mary: The Chamber is planning to sponsor at least 2 or 3 sidewalk sales during the year to spur sales in the retail establishments in the city. We would generally hold these events on a Friday -- sometimes also on a Saturday. Mainly, we hope to dovetail into the regular Friday Farmers' Market. There are 2 proposed dates for the first of these. It can be either October 12 and 13 or October 26 and 27. We would suggest the hours to be 10 A.M. to 5 P.M. There are probably some regulations as to setback, pedestrian access, etc. that we need to know about. Hope you can help us with these. Merchants have very little opportunity to tie in with other community events that might bring in some additional taxable sales. The exception is the Fiesta de las Artes and this event primarily benefits only those in the fiesta area. We would hope to encourage other businesses in the general downtown area to participate. Thank you for your assistance on this promotion and for the other ways you help us throughout the year. Cordially, %l. Wesley Bush Executive Director September 15, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council September 25, 1990 SAND AND STRAND RUN - PARKING WAIVER RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council waive parking fees and time limits for meters along Pier Avenue (from Manhattan Avenue to the Municipal Pier) and on Hermosa Avenue between 8th and 16th Streets during the Sand and Strand Run on Sunday, February 10, 1991. It is further recommended that Council approve this request indefinitely for the purposes of future Sand and Strand Runs. BACKGROUND The Sand and Strand Run is an annual Hermosa Beach event now in it's 39th year. The run is unique, consisting of 55% sand and 45% Strand terrain. Please see the attached flyer from last year's race. The run is co-sponsored by the City of Hermosa Beach and The Friends of the 1736 House (a Hermosa Beach organization which benefits victims of domestic violence and child abuse) with proceeds being divided equally. ANALYSIS It is hoped that free parking will encourage more participants. A similar request to waive parking fees has been made of City Council over the past several years and has been approved. The request to consider approval of this waiver indefinitely would prevent it from occupying space on future agendas and in maintaining the integrity of one of Hermosa Beach's consistently popular community events. Con ary C --Rooney, Director Dep . of Community Resources evin B. N6rthcj'af t City Manager Respectfully submitted, rt Carol Belser, Recreation Specialist Dept. of Community Resources a Wilson, Diy`ector ral Services Sponsored & Organized by: • Friends of the 1736 Family Crisis Center • Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources • DeLay's Printing • South Bay Distance Runners • Easy Reader • Good Stuff Restaurant • ENTRY Pre -Registration, Wed., February 7, 1990 DEADLINE Late Registration up to Race Day. • ENTRY FEE • RUN DATE • TWO RACES • FAMILY TEAMS 2.5 Mile — $10.00 5.0 Mile — $10.00 Both — $12.00 Late — add $2.00 Sunday, February 11, 1990 (rain or shine) 2.5 — 8 a.m. Local 2.5 Mile Run 5.0 — 9 a.m. TAC sanctioned 5.0 Mile run Family Team Awards will be presented in each of the team categories for the 2.5 mile race only. Each family team consists of an adult and a child (17 or younger). Both team members must be registered for the 2.5 Mile Run. • RACE SITE • RACE COURSE • RACE DAY INFO • AWARDS • PARKING Proceeds to benefit victims of child abuse and domestic violence and the Department of Community Resources. South side of Hermosa Beach Municipal Pier at the water's edge— start/finish line. Sand (55%) and Strand (45%). See map on reverse side. Runners's numbers are to picked up at race site on morning of the race. For the 2.5 Mile Run 7 a.m. til 7:45 a.m. For the 5.0 Mile Run 7 a.m. til 8:45 a.m. T -Shirt distribution will follow each race For all races will be presented at the conclusion of the 5.0 Mile run. Special Awards will be given for 1st and 2nd Place. Free parking available. See back. Sanctioned by The Southern Pacific Association of the Athletic Congress (TAC) (One entry per form) ENTRY FORM for the 38th Annual Sand & Strand Run in Hermosa Beach Run February 11, 1990 LAST NAME ADDRESS FIRST NAME INITIAL rI CITY STATE BIRTHDATE MO DAN FEE (check one) CI 2.5 Mile Race ❑ 5.0 Mile Race ❑ Both Races O Family AGE PHONE ZIP YR (ON 2/7/90) PRE- LATE REG. REG. $10.00 $10.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $14.00 DIVISION (check one) a 0 12 & under b 13-15 c❑16-18 d❑19-21 e 0 22 - 29 (each team member must be registered for 2.5 mile race) SEX I I MALE FEMALE f❑30-39 g El 40 - 49 h U 50 - 59 iEl60-69 j El 70 plus FAMILY TEAM ENTRY O Both Adult and Child are Female Ci Both Adult and Chili are Male ❑ One Member Male one Member Female PRINT NAME OF YOUR TEAM MEMBER (each member. must also be registered with their own application form). LAST NAME Make check payable to: Hermosa Beach Sand & Strand Run Fees are non-refundable 0 Please FIRST NAME Mail to: AGE Hermosa Beach Sand & Strand Run c/o Friends of 1736 P.O. Box 862 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 accept my additional donation of $ for the victims of Family Violence and the city of Hermosa Beach. PLEASE SIGN WAIVER ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE SENDING APPLICATION. L_ Water's edge - H.B. Pier J Water's edge }• •N E 1L The Strand 1 lap equals 2.5 miles PARKING On Race Day FREE Parking will be available from 7 am - 12 noon along Pier Avenue (from Manhattan Avenue to the Municipal Pier) and on Hermosa Avenue between 8th and 16th Streets. LIABILITY WAIVER FOR HERMOSA BEACH SAND'& STRAND RUN In consideration of the acceptance of this entry in the Hermosa Beach Sand and Strand Run to be held on Sunday, February 11, 1990 in Hermosa Beach, Califomia, we the undersigned participant and (if participant is under 18 years of age) parent or guardian, intending to be legally bound, do hereby for ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators waive, release and forever discharge any and all rights or claims for damages, which we, or either of us, may have or which may hereafter accrue to us, or either of us, against any and all persons, organizations and legal entities, affiliated with said race and, more particularly, the Southern Pacific Association of the Athletic Congress, its officer, agents and employees; the Long Distance Running Committee; the South Bay Distance Runners; the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees; the 1736 Family Crisis Center, its officers, agents and employees; DeLay's Printing, its officers, agents and employees; together with their representatives, successors, assigns and/or sponsors for any and all damages which may be sustained or suffered by us in connection with or entry in, and/or arising out of our traveling to, participation in and returning from said Hermosa Beach Sand and Strand Run. I/We attest and verify that I am or we are physically fit and have sufficiently trained for this competition. SIGNED Date Parent or Legal Guardian Dite (is required in addition to signature of participant if participant is under the age of 18 years) September 17, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 25, 1990 SUBJECT: SALE OF MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) BUS PASSES INITIATED BY STAFF PURPOSE: PROVIDE TEMPORARY FUNDS FOR OBTAINING BUS PASSES AND TICKET BOOKS FOR SALE TO THE PUBLIC, AND FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COST Recommendation Approve the use of General Fund money, and absorb the administrative cost. Authorize General Services to sell tickets and passes at Base 3. Alternative Approve an appropriation of Prop. A fund totaling $8,400 for MAX bus passes for sale to the public, and an additional 15%, $1,260, maximum for administrative costs for an overall total of $9,660. Estimated revenue would be $8,400. Background The lead agency, Torrance, has requested all participating cities to sell bus passes as part of the marketing program for the newly operational commuter bus. Analysis Currently the General Services Department sells subsidized bus passes for the RTD at Base 3 for students, seniors, and handicapped persons. The intent is to sell MAX passes (which are not subsidized) at Base 3 also. Ticket books are initially purchased by the City and then sold to the general public; the City is thereby reimbursed at the time of sale. If the monthly passes are not sold, the City may return them by the 25th of each month. There is no initial charge for passes. The estimated maximum number of tickets that will be sold each month is as follows: 10 monthly passes 20 ticket books 1 1j Since the City is reimbursed for the passes and ticket books, and the estimated number of tickets and passes to be sold monthly is small, the administrative cost will be nominal. If Prop A funds are used, the administrative cost increase significantly because of the reporting requirements, and annual audit. The estimated time to sell a monthly pass or a ticket book is approximately 3 or 4 minutes. Therefore, the total estimated administrative time is 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 hours per month. The cost for a ticket book is $12.50, and the cost for a monthly pass is $45.00. It should be noted that administrative cost are being compensated for the sale of subsidized RTD passes and any minor additional cost of MAX ticket sales could be absorbed via that program. Respectfully sub it3ed, CONCUR: /. • Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager - 2 Michael Schubach Planning Director Concur: Y Cindy ,Wi lson Genet1 Services Director Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director p/ccsrpass September 17, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council September 25, 1990 DONATION OF CARPETING AND TILE TO THE COMMUNITY CENTER RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council accept the donation of new carpeting and tile for the Civic Theatre foyer, lobby and Room 12 in the Community Center from the Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation. BACKGROUND The Hermosa Civic Theatre carpeting was installed in 1984. For the past two fiscal years, the re -carpeting of this area has remained unfunded in the City's CIP budget. The Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation conducted the first annual Sixties Right On Fundraiser and Dance on August 18.° One of the goals of the event was to raise funds to provide the much needed carpeting at the Center. ANALYSIS With the successful results from the Sixties Party (which netted approximately $11,000), the Board is ready and willing to proceed with the re -carpeting project. The Foundation proposes to provide carpeting and tile entryways for the theatre foyer, lobby, hallway and Room 12. All materials will be brought to the Public Works Department for approval prior to installation to insure their durability and safety. It is anticipated that the new carpeting will not only greatly enhance the appearance of the area but will also assist in the marketing of the facility for renters. It is further hoped that the prompt completion of this project will serve as a thank you to the generous donors and volunteers who worked so diligently to insure the fundraiser was a success. Concur: / Kevin B. North.raft City Manager Respectfully Submitted, Mary C. obey, Director Dep o Community Resources Anthony ntich, Di ec Public Works Depar ment 1k September 18 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 25, 1990 REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH GATES McDONALD FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY'S WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Man- ager to execute the attached amendment to the contract with Gates McDonald for workers' compensation claims administration ser- vices, increasing the monthly fee to $2,000 effective October 1, 1990 and $2,120 effective July 1, 1991 and appropriate $4,200 from the Fund Balance in the Insurance Fund to the Workers' Com- pensation Account (#705-401-1217-4201). BACKGROUND: In 1988 the City awarded the contract for Workers' Compensation Claims Administration Services to Gates McDonald. On September 26, 1989 the Council approved an extension of the contract for a three year period with an annual fee of $16,000 ($1,333.34 per month) and provision for the second and third year fee to be negotiated. ANALYSIS: The proposed monthly fee negotiated with Gates McDonald is $2,000 for the period October 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991 and $2,120 for the period July. 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992. The initial fee represents a 50% increase over the prior year's fee while the second year increase is a more modest 6%. The large initial increase is a result of the passage of the Worker's Compensation Reform Act which was effective January 1st of this year. With the passage of the Act, third party administrators became liable for stiff penalties if they were not in compliance with the Act's requirements. In response to the changes in the law, third party administrators have increased the number of staff assigned to claims administration as well as supervisory staff to monitor compliance. Penalties of up to $25,000 can be imposed by the Department of Industrial Relations for such. items as: failure to make timely disability payments; accept or deny liability within 90 days; adequately calculate earnings; and ade- quately document claims files. A phone survey of surrounding cities indicates that they have experienced increases between 35% - 60% for workers' compensation administration services during this past year. 11 Although the contract with Gates McDonald runs through June 30, 1992, the City has the option to terminate the contract upon 90 days written notice. In order to ensure that the City is receiv- ing the best service for the cost, and as a result of the sig- nificant increase in the fee, the City is testing the market by soliciting proposals from other third party administrators. Should a review of the proposals indicate that the City can receive the same level of service from another administrator for a reduced cost, staff will make the appropriate recommendation to the Council. A copy of the complete contract along with the proposed amendment is attached for the Council's review. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: %/ Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager CONTRACT AMENDMENT 2 Effective October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1992, the fee for self-insurance services shall be as follows: $2,000 per month beginning October 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991; $2,120 per month beginning July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992. Invoices are issued at the beginning of each calendar month and are payable within thrity (30) days from the date of issuance. The above amendment to the contract effective October 1, 1988 is accepted by Gates McDonald and City of Hermosa Beach. BY: GATES, McDONALD & COMPANY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH W. R. Nelson Regional Manager (Name and Title Typed or Printed) (Date) (Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager (Name and Title Typed or Printed) Ci"y Att -y THIS document shall not become a binding contract on Gates, McDonald & Company until it is approved and accepted at the Home Office of Gates, McDonald & Company. By: GATES, McDONALD & COMPANY HOME OFFICE APPROVAL (Name) (Title) (Date) CONTRACT AMENDMENT 1 That certain Professional Services Contract entered into September 12, 1988, by and between THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH and GATES, McDONALD AND COMPANY is amended as follows: ARTICLE 2, is amended Exhibit "B", Paragraph three (3), "-Contract Price" as follows: The fee for services provided in year one (1) of the contract shall be Sixteen Thousand Dollars ($16,000), billed in equal monthly installments of One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty -Three Dollars and Thirty -Four cents $1,333.34). The fee for services provided for year two (2) of the contract shall be negotiated by the parties to the contract at least sixty (60) days prior to renewal date. The fee for services provided for year three (3) of the contract shall be negotiated by the parties to the contract at least sixty (60) days prior to renewal date. For the purpose of this Agreement, the renewal date is the first calendar date of each subsequent Contract term. ARTICLE 2, Exhibit "B", Paragraph six (6), fee for open claims is deleted. ARTICLE 4, Duration, is amended to read that the term of the Contract is as follows: Year Year Year 1 is October 1, 1989 to September 30, 1990 2 is October 1, 1990 to June .30, 1991 3 is July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992 That all other terms and..conditions.shall remain.the same. The above -Amendment to the Professional Services Contract is accepted by THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH and GATES, McDONALD and COMPANY on the date inscribed. GATES, McDONALD & COMPANY BY: ILS 1 (Name and Title tyd or rin ed) DATE: . ZZ L lq 6 • THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY: (Name and Title typed or printed) _ / DATE: ;�' , �y___/),//1 r_/ Page 1 of 2 Pages THIS document shall not become a binding contract on Gates, McDonald and Company until it is approved and accepted at the Home Office of Gates, McDonald and Company. GATES, McDONALD AND COMPANY HOME OFFICE APPROVAL B Y : , —c) .-er7'- (Name) (Title) 10--5-V'? (Date) Page 2 of 2 Pages GATES, McDONALD & COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITNESSETH: That in consideration of the agreements expressed herein, The City of Hermosa Beach, ("Client"), having an office at Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254 and Gates, McDonald & Company, ("Gates, McDonald"), a corporation of the State of Ohio having an office at P. 0. Box 1944, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1944, do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 - SCOPE OF WORK Gates, McDonald shall render all the services specified in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. The services shall be performed in accordance with such requirements or restrictions as may be lawfully imposed by governmental authority and shall exclude any activities which may be deemed the practice of law. ARTICLE 2 - CONTRACT PRICE Client shall pay Gates, McDonald for its performance under this contract in accordance with the schedule contained in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Unless otherwise specifically provided in Exhibit B, the scheduled payments include the cost of all labor, equipment, materials and travel required to complete the services described in Exhibit A. ARTICLE 3 - BILLING AND PAYMENT Gates, McDonald shall submit invoices for all work performed under this contract. Invoices against this contract shall indicate the work performed for which billing is rendered, shall be in accordance with the schedule of payments in Exhibit B, and shall be submitted in duplicate to the following: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CIVIC CENTER 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 ARTICLE 4 - DURATION This contract applies to all work performed by Gates, McDonald which is described in Exhibit A hereto, whether performed in anticipation of or following the execution of this contract, the initial contract term of this contract shall begin on SGT_ I 066 and shall expire on Sar.3E- 06y . Upon expiration of the initial contract term, the contract shall automatically renew itself from year-to-year subject to termination by either party upon ninety (90) days written notice. Either party may, -a-t thy --a - t4e give written notice of its intention to terminate at the end of the initial contract term. When this contract is terminated, then and in that event, the parties shall make an adjustment to the payment schedule in Exhibit B to reflect the amount Gates, McDonald is entitled to receive under this contract for services performed prior to the date of termination. Thereafter, Client shall pay Gates, McDonald monies due and owing after such adjustment, if any, or Gates, McDonald shall refund monies due and owing Client after such adjustment, if any. ARTICLE 5 - CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Any payroll wage information or other technical or business information ("Information") furnished or disclosed hereunder is the property of Client and shall be deemed confidential to Client and shall be returned to Client at the conclusion of this contract, or shall be destroyed. If such Information is generally known, Gates, McDonald is free of any obligation to keep it confidential. Information subsequently made public need not be held in confidence by Gates, McDonald. ARTICLE 6 - RELATIONSHIP Gates, McDonald shall exercise full control and direction over the subcontractors and employees of Gates, McDonald performing the work covered by this contract. Neither Gates, McDonald nor its employees, agents or subcontractors shall be deemed to be employees.of Client. It is understood that Gates, McDonald is an independent contractor for all purposes and at all times. Gates, McDonald is wholly responsible for withholding and payment of all federal, state and local income and other payroll taxes with respect to its employees. ARTICLE 7 - ASSIGNMENT This contract is one for personal services and may not be delegated or assigned by Gates, McDonald without the written consent of Client. All work performed by a subcontractor, if any, shall be deemed work performed by Gates, McDonald. ARTICLE 8 - NON-DISCRIMINATION Gates, McDonald shall comply, at its own expense, with the provisions of all applicable state and municipal requirements and with all state and federal laws and regulations applicable to the work and to Gates, McDonald as an employer of labor or otherwise. Gates, McDonald agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin or handicap. ARTICLE 9 - AGREEMENT AND NOTICES The provisions of this contract constitute the whole and entire agreement between Gates, McDonald and Client and may be modified and altered only by mutual agreement, reduced to writing, executed by authorized representatives, and delivered to each other. Whenever notices or consents are required to be given under this contract, such notices or consents shall be reduced to writing, executed by authorized representatives, and delivered to the other party. ARTICLE 10 - WAIVER The failure of either party at any time to enforce any right or remedy available to it under this contract with respect to any breach or failure by the other party shall not be construed to be a waiver of such right or remedy. ARTICLE 11 - SEVERABILITY In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained herein shall for any reason be held to be unenforceable in any respect under the law of any state or of the United States of America, such unenforceability shall not affect any other provision of this contract, but this contract shall then be construed as if such unenforceable provision or provisions had never been contained herein. ARTICLE 12 - SURVIVAL OF OBLIGATION The obligations of the parties under this contract that by their nature continue beyond the expiration of the contract shall survive any termination or cancellation of this contract. ARTICLE 13 - CAPTIONS The captions in this contract are included for convenience only and shall not be construed to define or limit any of the provisions contained herein. ARTICLE 14 - INDEMNIFICATION Gates, McDonald agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Client with respect to any claims, demands actions, damages, costs and/or expenses to which Client may be subjected as a consequence of or as a result of any error, omission, tort, intentional tort, willful misconduct or any other negligence on the part of Gates, McDonald and/or its employees unless the complained of actions of Gates, McDonald was taken at the specific request of the Client. The Client agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Gates, McDonald with respect to any claims, demands, actions, damages, costs, and/or expenses to which Gates, McDonald may be subjected as a consequence of or as a result of any error, omission, tort, intentional tort, willful misconduct or any other negligence on the part of the client and/or its employees. ARTICLE 15 - INSURANCE Upon request, Gates, McDonald will provide Client with Certificates of Insurance evidencing adequate general liability insurance coverage, automobile liability insurance coverage, workers' compensation insurance coverage, fidelity coverage (bond), and errors and omissions insurance coverage. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Gates, McDonald and Client have executed this contract in several counterparts on the day and year below written. GATES, McDONALD & COMPANY By & Title Typed or Printe0- /6, Date) THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH / 9 By. , Fes• /Pdrr4 f'„ --1/(/c 67/4(7(.1' (Name & Title Typed or Printed)/ J- 1 /<, /� (Date) oved as to form iky Attorney of H-r..mosa Bea EXHIBIT A SERVICE ELEMENTS This is the Exhibit A referred to in the foregoing Contract between The City of Hermosa Beach, ("Client") and Gates, McDonald & Company, ("Gates, McDonald") and sets forth the principal services to be performed under this Contract. Gates, McDonald will perform the following services: assume the administration of all claims of Client reported after the effective date of the contract. investigate, adjust and notify Client of questionable or improper claims before undertaking further activity. after auditing medical bills for conformity to accepted reasonable fee schedules, Gates, McDonald will tabulate and approve for payment all medical, hospital, compensation, and other benefits required by the Workers' Compensation Law, which shall be paid in accordance with the procedure agreed upon by the parties hereto. utilize the services of outside medical resources or advisory bodies with Client's approval. upon approval, potential rehabilitation cases can be recommended to firms known to develop rehabilitation plans with realistic goals. Gates, McDonald will direct and monitor all cases for effectiveness and cost containment. establish the amount of and revise claim reserves. where necessary, contact claimants to obtain needed information, assure proper medical treatment, answer questions and encourage positive resolution. utilize an appropriate payment system in accordance with Client's fiscal policies, procedures and state requirements. maintain a current roster of physicians and/or medical specialists who provide initial treatment or specialty care. Consultations will be arranged as needed. recommend experienced and qualified legal counsel for Client's approval where needed for the defense of litigated workers' compensation claims. Gates, McDonald will provide all pertinent information to the participant's legal counsel necessary to accommodate scheduled hearings before the Worker's Compensation Commission. initiate subrogation proceedings in making reasonable administrative efforts to recover from third parties, benefits paid under this program for which they may be legally liable; and cooperate with such legal counsel as may be designated in any legal action as may be necessary to effect such recovery. recommend specialized professional investigative services where needed. Gates, McDonald will furnish statistical reports showing open and closed claims by location and a tabulation of all payments made and reserves set up for benefits and expenses because of occupational injuries sustained by employees. Gates, McDonald will perform other general administrative services as necessary to effectively discharge Client's duties to its employees and under the Workers' Compensation State Statutes. As agreed upon, Gates, McDonald will compile and file all notices and reports required under the Workers' Compensation Statutes of the State of California. EXHIBIT B FEES AND REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES This is the Exhibit B referred to in the foregoing Contract between The City of Hermosa Beach, ("Client") and Gates, McDonald & Company ("Gates, McDonald") and shows the amounts to be paid to Gates, McDonald for the various services to be performed under this Contract. Client agrees to pay Gates, McDonald following receipt and acceptance by Client of invoices for work performed hereunder as follows: The annual fee for the services to be provided as set forth shall be $9,940 billed in equal quarterly installments of $2,485. Invoices are issued at the beginning of each calendar quarter and are payable within thirty (30) days from date of issuance. Billing for services performed during a period of less than a calendar quarter is prorated. Loss control services are available for $85 per hour plus documented expenses to be billed monthly. Invoices are payable within thirty (30) days from date of issuance. more than 10% per year fee of $9,940. The feef-- th.„ _ir, t n i nc r shall be subject to a fee increase of no for the subsequent two years, computed on the first year The fee for each open claim on which Gates, McDonald assumes administrative responsibility at contract inception shall be $85 per claim for the first year and $65 per claim for each subsequent year that the claim remains open. SABER (Optional) The first year fee shall be $5,700, of which $2,470 will be billed at time of installation and will include software, programming, one day of training in Columbus and system manuals. The annual fee of $3,230 shall be billed quarterly and will include software and product upgrades, technical support and quarterly downloads. Additional days of on-site training are available at $560 per day plus out-of-pocket expenses. The amount of any fees for additional services which were contracted in excess of the above will be paid by Client within sixty (60) days after an accounting of all fees and expenses by Gates, McDonald is forwarded to Client. This accounting will be furnished as soon as practicable after the expiration of the contract year. In addition to the amounts charged per the fee schedule, Client will be responsible for allocated expenses with prior approval. These are defined as court costs, fees and expenses; fees for services of process; fees to attorneys; costs of undercover operative and detective services; cost of employing experts for preparation of maps, photographs, diagrams, chemical or physical analysis; advice, opinion or testimony concerning claims under investigation or in litigation; costs for legal transcripts of testimony taken at coroners' inquests, criminal or civil proceedings; costs for copies of any public records; costs of depositions and court reported or recorded statements; and any other similar fee, cost or expense reasonably charged for investigation, negotiation, settlement or defense of a claim or loss or to the protection and perfection of the subrogation rights of a client. If this offer is not accepted within ninety (90) days following the proposal date, the offer shall expire. In the event this service contract is discontinued, Gates, McDonald will return all of the open claim files at the time of termination. Gates, McDonald will continue to handle such open files at the time of termination for an additional fee to be agreed upon at that time. September 17, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 25, 1990 APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND ADOPTION OF JURISDICTION RESOLUTION, OVERLAY OF VALLEY, ARDMORE AND PROSPECT CIP 85-137 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the attached Agreement with the County of Los Angeles providing for the construction of Valley Drive, Ardmore Avenue and Prospect Avenue Pavement Overlay Project. 2. Adopt the attached Resolution No. 90- transferring to the County of Los Angeles jurisdiction over the City streets to be improved by this project. Included in this resolution is the finding that the project is categorically exempt in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. Background: The resurfacing of Valley Drive, Ardmore Avenue and Prospect Avenue is included in the FY 1990-91 budget. The project provides for an asphaltic overlay of the street; construction of handicap ramps; reconstruction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk where appropriate; construction of minor drainage facilities and construction of a sanitary sewer. A portion of the street work is eligible for grant funding due to being on the County's list of "Select System" streets. Analysis: This section is divided as follows: 1. Agreement 2. Jurisdiction 3. Environmental Findings 4. Funding - 1 - 1 m 1. Agreement The attached Agreement between the City and the County of Los Angeles provides for the County to advertise, award, and administer the construction contract for the proposed work. The County of Los Angeles has agreed to design and administer the construction contract for the City. The project will improve the driving surface, local drainage and increase the life of the street pavement. The County is now nearing completion of the design. They anticipate that a contract could be advertised in November, 1990, with the contract being awarded in December of 1990. Construction could then commence soon after that date. However, before advertisement of the contract can proceed, the attached Agreement with the County needs to be formalized and the County must be granted temporary jurisdiction over the streets to be improved. 2. Jurisdiction Temporary transfer of jurisdiction to the County over these three streets is necessary in order to enable the County to advertise, award, and administer the construction contract for this project. This is a standard procedure used by the County for improvements of this nature. Under Section 1701 and 1805 of the Streets and Highway Code, the City may consent to this transfer of jurisdiction by resolution. A resolution has been prepared for Council review and adoption. 3. Environmental Findings In addition, Section 65402(b) of the Government Code provides that the City Council may find by resolution that the project involves improvements of a minor nature. By finding that the project involves improvements of a minor nature, provisions of Section 65402(b) requiring submission to and a report upon this project by the City's planning agency do not apply. This project was evaluated by the City and the county staffs and found to be categorically exempt in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This finding has been included in the attached resolution granting jurisdiction to the County. 4. Funding The current project cost estimate for this project is $970,000. In accordance with program guidelines, 86% of eligible costs can be financed with Federal -Aid Urban (FAU) funds. However, only Valley Drive and Ardmore Avenue north of Pier Avenue are eligible (See "Exhibit A"). Ardmore Avenue south of Pier Avenue is not eligible because of the parking that is allowed on the east side of the street. Prospect Avenue is not eligible because it is too narrow and allows parking. A detailed breakdown of the estimated expenditures and the funding sources for FY 1990-91 is attached (See "Exhibit B"). This information is based on the FY 1990-91 budget and is the latest data available to the City staff. Alternatives: 1. Return this item to staff for further evaluation. 2. Revise the scope of the project. 3. Delete the project at this time. Respectfully Submitted, Conc Lynn A. Terry Deputy City Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director ty/overlay Ant64/ hony Antich Director of Publiic Works Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager ‘) Michael Schubach Planning Director AREA "A" 86% FAU FUNDS, 14% LOCAL MATCHING FUNDS AREA "B" $40,000 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AREA "C" 100% LOCAL CITY FUNDS AREA "D" 100% LOCAL CITY FUNDS "EXHIBIT A" CIP 85-137 OVERLAY VALLEY, ARDMORE AND PROSPECT EXPENDITURES ELEMENTS EXPENDED PRIOR TO FY89-90 BUDGET FY89-90 EXPENDED THRU 2/28/90 ESTIMATED EXPENDED 6/30/90 ESTIMATED BALANCE 6/30/90 BUDGET FY90-91 ESTIMATED FUTURE BUDGET NEEDS ESTIMATEDPROJECT PROJECT TOTAL FY91-92 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OTHER DIRECT COSTS 3,759 68,366 0 0 68,366 0 0 0 28,000 24,000 840,000 28,000 32,000 40,000 28,000 27,759 840,000 28,000 32,000 SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY 3,759 68,366 0 0 68,366 0 952,000. 79,841 0 0 0 0 955,759 79,841 TOTAL EXPENDITURE S3,759 $68,366 SO SO S68,366 51,031,841 SO SO SO SO $1,035,600 FUNDING SOURCES CITY FUNDING SOURCES 001 DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION 115 STATE GAS 0 40,000 40,000 TAX 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 3,759 0 281,000 284,759 150 GRANT FUND - FAU 68,366 0 68,366 34,841 34,841 0 160 SEWER FUND FUNDING ASSIGNMENT FROM 150,000 150,000 OTHER AGENCIES 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 150 48,000 48,000 60,000 60,000 GRANT FUND - FAU 438,034 438,034 466,000 466,000 TOTAL CITY FUNDED 53,759 . 568,366 SO SO 568,366 $505,841 SO SO SO SO 5509,600 TOTAL OUTSIDE FUNDED SO 5486,034 $0 SO 5486,034 5526,000 50 SO SO SO 5526,000 TOTAL FUNDING 53,759 5554,400 $0 SO 5554,400 $1,031,841 SO SO SO SO $1,035,600 "EXHIBIT B"' 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 A RESOLUTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PORTIONS OF VALLEY 3 DRIVE, ARDMORE AVENUE, AND PROSPECT AVENUE WITHIN SAID CITY AS A PART OF THE SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 WHEREAS, the board of Supervisors of the county of Los Angeles, State of California, did on June 19, 1990, duly adopt a Resolution declaring that those portions of the following named streets between the limits indicated in the table below and intersecting streets appurtenant to the construction thereof, within the City of Hermosa Beach, to be a part of the System of Highways of the County of Los Angeles, all as provided in Sections 1700 to 1704 inclusive of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and, WHEREAS, said Board of Supervisors by said Resolution requested this Council to give its consent to allow the County to construct improvements and perform appurtenant work on said streets in the City of Hermosa Beach described below; and. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1(c), of the State Guidelines, the Secretary of Resources designated this type of project as categorically exempt. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Consent to Inclusion in County Highway System. 23 This City Council does hereby consent to the establishment of the 24 hereinafter named streets and intersecting streets appurtenant to 25 the construction thereof, within the City of Hermosa Beach, as a 26 part of the System of Highways of the County of Los Angeles as 27 provided in Sections 1700 to 1704 inclusive of the Streets and 28 Highways Code of the State of California. Said consent is for 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 the purpose of constructing improvements and performing appurtenant work as may be necessary by the county of Los Angeles. Name of Streets .Limits Valley Drive 50 Feet South of Longfellow Avenue to Herondo Street Ardmore Avenue 150 Feet North of Longfellow Avenue to 2nd Street Prospect Avenue 100 Feet North of llth Street to 110 Feet South of 1st Street SECTION 2. Finding of Categorical Exemption. This City Council does hereby find that the improvement of said streets is categorically exempt from the requirement for an Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1(c), of the State 13 of California's Guidelines for Implementation of the California 14 Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 15 SECTION 3. Finding of a Minor Nature. This City Council 16 does hereby find that pursuant to Government Code, Section 17 65402(b), the aforesaid improvements are for street improvements 18 of a minor nature and that, therefore, the provisions of said 19 Section requiring the submission to and report upon said project 20 by the City Planning Agency do not apply. 21 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1990. 22 23 II PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 24 25 26 ATTEST: APPROVED 'S TO FO 27 City Clerk City At orney 28 ty/reslahwy AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation in the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY". W ITNESSETH WHEREAS, Valley Drive, Ardmore Avenue and Prospect Avenue are on the Highway Element of CITY'S General Plan and on COUNTY'S Highway Plan; and WHEREAS, CITY and COUNTY propose to improve the streets listed below: Name of Streets and Limits Valley Drive from 50 feet south of Longfellow Avenue to Herondo Street Ardmore Avenue from 150 feet north of Longfellow Avenue to 2nd Street Prospect Avenue from 100 feet north of llth Street to 110 feet south of 1st Street WHEREAS, improvements consist of resurfacing and reconstruct- ing the deteriorated roadway pavement, reconstructing curb, gutter, sidewalk and driveways and constructing wheelchair ramps and installing drainage facilities, which work is hereinafter referred to as "ROADWAY"; and WHEREAS, CITY has requested and COUNTY is willing to include in addition to ROADWAY the construction of sanitary sewer facilities, which work is hereinafter referred to as "SEWER"; and -2 - WHEREAS, ROADWAY and SEWER together are hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and WHEREAS, PROJECT is entirely within the jurisdictional limits of CITY; and WHEREAS, PROJECT is in the general interest of CITY and COUNTY; and WHEREAS, COUNTY is willing to prepare plans, specifications and cost estimates for ROADWAY and to administer PROJECT; and WHEREAS, CITY is willing to prepare plans, specifications and cost estimates for SEWER at CITY'S expense; and WHEREAS, CITY is willing to finance the entire cost of ROADWAY and the construction cost of SEWER; and WHEREAS, CITY is also willing to assign to COUNTY a portion of its available Federal -aid Urban (FAU) funds to cover the federally reimbursable construction cost of ROADWAY; and WHEREAS, COUNTY is willing to accept this assignment of FAU funds. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by CITY and COUNTY and of the premises herein contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: (1) CITY AGREES: a. To prepare plans, specifications and cost estimates for SEWER, at CITY'S expense. -3- b. To finance the entire cost of ROADWAY and the con- struction cost of SEWER, currently estimated to be $970,000, based upon a final accounting. c. To assign to COUNTY sufficient available CITY FAU funds to cover the federally reimbursable construc- tion cost of ROADWAY, currently estimated to be $335,000. d. Following the opening of construction bids for PROJECT and upon demand by COUNTY, to deposit other CITY funds with COUNTY, to finance the cost of pre- paring plans, specifications and cost estimates for ROADWAY, the matching construction cost of ROADWAY, the federally nonparticipating construction cost of ROADWAY and the construction cost of SEWER, currently estimated to be $635,000. e. Upon completion of PROJECT to maintain, in good condi- tion and at CITY expense, all improvements constructed as part of PROJECT within CITY'S jurisdiction. (2) COUNTY AGREES: a. To prepare plans, specifications and cost estimates for ROADWAY. b. To obtain approval from CITY of plans for ROADWAY prior to advertising for construction bids. -4- c. To advertise PROJECT for construction bids, to award and to administer the construction contract, to do all things necessary and proper to complete PROJECT, and to act in behalf of CITY in all negotiations pertaining thereto. d. To accept the assignment of CITY FAU funds. e. To furnish CITY, within 120 days after final acceptance of PROJECT and Board of Supervisors' approval of final payment to contractor, a final accounting itemizing actual unit costs and actual quantities for PROJECT. IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: a. The cost of ROADWAY, as referred to in this Agreement, shall consist of the costs of preparing plans, speci- fications and cost estimates, required materials, final contract, detour and final signing and striping, construction engineering, construction survey, utility relocation and all other work necessary to construct ROADWAY in accordance with approved plans; and shall include currently effective percentages added to total salaries, wages and equipment costs to cover overhead, administration and depreciation in connec- tion with any or all of the aforementioned items. b. The construction cost of SEWER, as referred to in this Agreement, shall consist of the costs of the -5 - final contract, required materials, detour and final signing and striping, construction engineering, con- struction survey, utility relocation, and all other work necessary to construct SEWER in accordance with approved plans; and shall include currently effective percentages added to total salaries, wages and equip- ment costs to cover overhead, administration and depreciation in connection with any or all of the aforementioned items. The construction cost of SEWER shall not include the cost of preparing plans, speci- fications and cost estimates. c. That CITY'S actual FAU assignment will be an amount equal to the federally reimbursable construction cost of ROADWAY, based upon the final accounting. d. That CITY'S actual contribution of other CITY funds shall be an amount equal to the sum of the cost of preparing plans, specifications and cost estimates for ROADWAY, the matching construction cost'of ROADWAY, the federally nonparticipating construction cost of ROADWAY and the construction cost of SEWER, all based upon a final accounting. e. That if, for some reason, CITY'S available balance of FAU funds is insufficient to cover CITY'S commitment as set forth in paragraph (3), c. above, CITY will pay other CITY funds to COUNTY upon demand so that, when -6 - combined with the CITY FAU funds available, the total will equal CITY'S commitment as set forth in paragraph (3), c. If at the final accounting the amount of other CITY funds due COUNTY is more than $200, CITY will pay the amount due upon demand. Conversely, if at final accounting the amount of other CITY funds deposited exceeds the amount due by $200 or more, COUNTY will refund said excess to CITY. f. That if CITY'S deposit, as set forth in paragraph (1), d. is not delivered to the COUNTY office which is described on COUNTY'S invoice within 30 days after date of invoice, COUNTY is entitled to recover interest thereon. Said interest shall be at the rate of 7 percent per annum or any portion thereof calculated from the last day of the month in which the services were performed. g That if CITY'S deposit, as set forth in paragraph (1), d. is not delivered to the COUNTY office which is described on COUNTY'S invoice within 30 days after the date of the invoice, COUNTY may satisfy such indebtedness, including interest thereon from any funds of CITY on deposit with COUNTY, without giving further notice to CITY of COUNTY'S intention to do so. h. CITY shall'review all invoices and report in writing any discrepancies to the COUNTY'S Department of Public Works (DPW) within 30 calendar days. Undisputed -7 -- charges shall be paid by CITY within 30 calendar days of receipt of invoice. DPW shall review all disputed charges and submit a written justification detailing the basis for those charges within 30 calendar days of receipt of CITY'S written report. CITY shall then make payment of the previously disputed charges or submit justification for nonpayment within 30 days. i. COUNTY, at any time, may, at its sole discretion, designate an alternative payment mailing address and an alternative schedule for deposit of CITY funds. CITY shall be notified of such changes by invoice. j This Agreement shall not take effect unless and until COUNTY, pursuant to Section 1700 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, declares the streets described herein within CITY to be COUNTY highways for the purpose of the construction of improvements thereon and CITY, pursuant to Section 1701 of aforementioned Code, shall consent to said streets becoming COUNTY highways for the duration of this project. k. Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee of COUNTY, shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of CITY, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under -8 - this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify, defend and hold COUNTY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of CITY, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. 1. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee of CITY, shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason o•f any acts or omissions on the part of COUNTY, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY under this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, COUNTY shall fully indemnify, defend and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of COUNTY, under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY under this Agreement. -9- (4) It is understood and agreed that the provisions of any previous Assumption of Liability Agreement heretofore entered into between the parties hereto are inapplicable to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized, by the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH on , 1990 and by the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES on , 1990. ATTEST: LARRY J. MONTEILH Executive Officer -Clerk of the Board of Supervisors COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BY BY DEPUTY CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ATTEST: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY BY CITY CLERK MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM DE WITT W. CLINTON County Counsel BY DEPUTY September 12, 1990 City Council Meeting September 25, 1990 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 90-1046- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO ADD INSTALLATION OF AUTOMOBILE AUDIO EQUIPMENT AND ALARMS AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE C-3 ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." "Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 90-1046, relating to the above subject." At the meeting of September 11, 1990, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Concur: G Respectfully submitted, City Clerk evin B. North p aft, City Manager 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 90- 1046 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO ADD INSTALLATION OF AUTOMOBILE AUDIO EQUIPMENT AND ALARMS AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE C-3 ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on September 11, 1990, and made the following Findings: A. Installation of audio equipment and alarms not specifically listed as a permitted use in automobiles is in any zone; B. Businesses which install audio equipment and alarms on automobiles create a potential nuisance to adjacent property owners and residents because of the noise impact of installing and testing the equipment; C. Restricting this business activity to the C-3 zone and requiring a conditional use permit will ensure that environmental impacts associated with this activity will be minimized; The subject amendment will clarify the existing code in regards to the subject use, and will subject said uses to the proper regulation to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses; E. Approval of this amendment is not in conflict with the General Plan and is necessary to carry out the general purpose of the zoning ordinance to serve the public health, safety, and welfare; D. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby amend the zoning ordinance text as follows, and adopts an environmental negative declaration: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 1. Amend Section 8-4. C-3 Restricted Commercial zone by adding the following to the permitted use list in alphabetical order: "Automobile alarm sales, installation, and/or repair: Conditional Use Permit required subject to Article 10; Automobile audio equipment sales, installation, and/or repair; Conditional Use Permit required subject to Article 10" SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1990, by following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY p/persalrm September 12, 1990 City Council Meeting September 25, 1990 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 90-1047- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE REVOCATION AND SUSPENSION OF BUSINESS LICENSES." "Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 90-1047, relating to the above subject." At the meeting of September 11, 1990, this ordinance was introduced, as amended, by the following vote: AYES: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Concur: evin B. Nor hcr,.ft, City Manager Respectfully submitted, City Clerk AD6----YE-4-----CY 2b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 90-1047 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE REVOCATION AND SUSPENSION OF BUSINESS LICENSES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Section 17-21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 17.21. Revocation and Suspension of Licenses. Any license issued under the provisions of this title is issued and used by all parties receiving or using the same subject to the express condition that the City Council may revoke or suspend the license or impose new conditions in any of the followings instances: A. Where the City Council finds and determines that the preservation of the public health, safety and peace demand revocation of such license or permit; B. Where the licensee or permittee has violated any provisions of this code, any ordinance of the city or any other provision of law; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C. Where a permit or license has been granted on false or fraudulent evidence, testimony or application; D. Where the licensee or permittee has violated the terms and provisions of such license or permit; E. Where the licensee has conducted the business in an immoral or disorderly manner, or has failed to exercise reasonable efforts to maintain order among the customers and patrons and to prevent violation of law or ordinance by them; or F. The business has been conducted as to be a public nuisance. G. By the license collector, where the licensee has failed to pay the charges imposed by this chapter or to file reports as required by this chapter within sixty (60) days after such charges or reports become delinquent." Section 2. Section 17-21.1 is hereby added to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: "Section 17-21.1 Revocation or Suspension Hearing. No license shall be revoked without giving the holder thereof an opportunity to appear before the City Council and be heard 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in his own behalf. The City Council or City Manager may initiate such revocation proceedings and shall cause a notice of such hearing to be given to the holder of such license at the address set forth in the license application of the time and date of the hearing at least ten calendar days before the hearing. At the time set for the hearing or at the date to which the hearing may be continued by the City Council, the holder of the license may be heard and may present any facts to show why such license should not be revoked, and the City Council shall hear statements from other persons who may attend the hearing and present reasonswhy the license should or should not be revoked, and may, if it so desires, place under oath and question any person before it. At the close of the hearing, or at any time within thirty days thereafter, the City Council shall determine from the facts produced at the hearing, and from any other facts in its possession whether or not the license should be revoked, and shall make its order accordingly and may make such order conditional upon the doing or not doing of any act by the holder of the license or his agents or servants, which the City Council 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 deems for the public good. On the revocation of the license, all license fees shall be forfeited to the City. Notice of such revocation shall be given to the license holder by the City Clerk. A license may be suspended for such time and subject to such conditions as the City Council may impose in the same manner and for the same reasons that a license may be revoked. From and after the revocation or suspension of said license by the City Council, such license shall be null and void and no business shall be conducted or operated in any manner during any period of license revocation or suspension." Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after 30 days of its final passage and adoption. Section 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1990. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Citye City AJr ae t President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 5. Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa,Beach Planning Commission September 19, 1990 Regular Meeting of September 25, 1990 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 90-19 LOCATION: 638-640 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: WILLIAM CAMPBELL AND MAIKO SARAVIO 513 DIANTHUS MANHATTAN BEACH, CA REQUEST: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING C.U.P. TO ALLOW MOTORCYCLE REPAIR Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends denial of the Conditional Use Permit amendment. Attached is a proposed resolution of denial. Staff Recommendation As noted in the Planning Commission staff report, staff recommends approval. Also attached is a proposed resolution of approval. At this time, the approval would be for the minor repair of motorcycles only. ALTERNATIVE Continue this request until the Planning Commission and City Council complete their consideration of a text amendment to allow motorcycle sales and motorcycle part sales in the C-3 zone or to remove motorcycle repair as a permitted use. Staff asked the applicant if he preferred such a delay, and he declined. Background On August 21, 1990, the Planning Commission denied this request because of the proximity of residential uses, and the "non-mitigable" noise impacts that would result from the proposed use. Motorcycle repair is a permitted use in the C-3 zone subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant originally submitted an application for a C.U.P. amendment to allow a business consisting of motorcycle sales, parts sales, and minor repair. However, the Planning Commission, at their August 21 meeting, determined that since motorcycle sales and motorcycles parts sales are not specifically listed as permitted uses, a text amendment is necessary to allow those portions of the proposed business. As such, the Planning Commission only considered the request for motorcycle repair at that time. The text amendment is scheduled to be considered by the Planning Commission at their October 2, 1990 meeting. On January 16, 1990, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit and an environmental negative declaration for the remodel of the existing structure to allow an automobile agency, with the operation to be conducted indoors. The new owner of the property has completed the proposed building improvements that were approved as part of the C.U.P. The building has been rehabilitated and reduced in size. Also, a much improved facade has been constructed and a paved parking area has been provided in the rear. For further background please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff reports. Analysis Staff recommended approval because the project would be subject to strict conditions proposed by staff and agreed to by the applicant. For discussion of those conditions and further analysis please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff reports. ALTERNATIVE Since the desire of the applicant is to operate a business that includes sales, parts sales, and minor repair it may be appropriate to consider the whole operation at one public hearing. Only after consideration and final action regarding the proposed text amendment will this be possible. Also, the final action regarding the text amendment may change the permitted use list such that none of the portions of this proposed business will be allowed at all. Additionally, it may not be reasonable to consider motorcycle repair when the question of whether or not motorcycle parts can be sold has not been resolved. The sale of parts and accessories is usually part of a repair shop's operation. Michael Schubach Planning Direc or Kevin B. North aft City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution of Denial 2. Staff Proposed Resolution of Approval 3. P.C. Resolution 90-57 4. Before and after photos of site 5. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 8/21/90 and 7/17/90 6. Resolution P.C. 90-7 (CUP approval for auto sales) 7. Application 8. Correspondence 9. Public Notice Affidavit a/pcsr638 (See attached) n R6lYertson Associate Planner I CITY MANAGER COMMENT: The alternative is not appropriate without the applicant's consent. The applicant has appealed for a conditional use permit under current law and deserves a decision, regardless of what future zoning provisions may be adopted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW MOTORCYCLE REPAIR AT 638-640 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, DESCRIBED AS LOT 18 AND PORTION OF LOT 19, WILSON AND LIND'S TRACT WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on September 25, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an appeal of the Planning Commission denial of a Conditional Use Permit amendment at 638-640 Pacific Coast Highway and made the following Findings: A. The proposed business would cater to customers arriving and leaving. on motorcycles, thereby creating a non-mitigable noise problem which will result in a nuisance to nearby residences; B. The proposed use is not compatible with surrounding land uses; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby concur with the Planning Commission's decision to deny a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow Motorcycle repair at 638-640 Pacific Coast Highway. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1990 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: p/pers638d CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY - (7 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL RESOLUTION 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, ON APPEAL, TO ALLOW THE MINOR REPAIR OF MOTORCYCLES AT 638-640 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, DESCRIBED AS LOT 18 AND PORTION OF LOT 19, WILSON AND LIND'S TRACT WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on September 25, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an appeal of the Planning Commission's permit amendment at 638-640 Pacific following Findings: A. denial of a conditional use Coast Highway and made the The applicant has remodeled an existing building which reduced the building and created parking; B. The Planning Commission has use for an automobile sales C. D. one-story commercial total square footage of the previously approved a proposed agency, and the new owner is requesting to conduct motorcycle repair; The proposed use is consistent with surrounding commercial uses; The imposition of conditions will mitigate any significant impacts associated with the proposed use; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow the minor repair of motorcycles at 638-640 Pacific Coast Highway, subject to the following conditions: 1. The location of structures and features on the property shall be in accordance with submitted plans and the conditions below; any modification shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. 2. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 10:00 A.M. and__6_:00 P..M_.__o.nMonday through Saturday and from 4:0-0--P:M—on Sundays ' G 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. The applicant shall provide six (6) parking spaces for automobiles as shown on the site plan for employee and customer use. a. All parking spaces shall be properly striped with appropriate signs posted indicating that the spaces are for employee and customer use only. b. Vehicles for sale shall not be parked in the required parking area, driveway, or on the public sidewalk. c. All parking areas shall be maintained free of unregistered and derelict vehicles or parts at all times. 4. The rear parking area shall be prohibited for use by customers arriving on motorcycles. To prevent the parking of motorcycles the driveway access shall be blocked with a chain or other impediment, which is monitored by an attendant to allow the use of parking area by automobiles. 5. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant/owner to ensure that motorcycles parked on the public street in front of the establishment are parked in an orderly manner, anddo not interfere with normal pedestrian or traffic flow. 6. Motorcycles to be serviced shall enter the building through the front door, unless they are walked to the rear with the engines turned -off, or unless sound baffles are temporarily installed on the motorcycles to reach the service area in the rear. 7. Seating around the counter/"bar" installed in the interior of the business shall be removed and prohibited. Snacks and/or beverages shall not be sold or distributed freely from the premises, and only beverages may be offered on a complementary basis to customers. a. Congregations of individuals for the purpose of eating, drinking or conversation is prohibited b. Advertising the availability of snacks or beverages is prohibited. 8.- The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists whether due to noise caused by customers, or loitering, and may require the presence of a police approved security personnel, to be paid for by the applicant/owner. a) The applicant/owner shall provide a security performance bond, at an amount to be determined by the Police Chief, to cover any excess cost to the City of excessive police service necessary to control noise or loitering problems on, or adjacent to, the establishment. 9. All the signs shall comply with the City's Sign Ordinance. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 -10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10. The public right-of-way shall not be used for the parking or storing of vehicles that are intended for sale, detailing, or other purposes. 11. Test driving of vehicles on local residential streets shall be prohibited. Revving or testing of engines on the premises, or on the public sidewalk or on -street parking areas in front of the establishment shall be prohibited. 12. The landscaping shall be maintained along the east property line to provide a buffer zone from the residential properties. a. An automatic landscape sprinkler system shal b Kovided. 13. There shall be ,a_sign)postedA in the sales o ice directing the customers to the route, approved by the Planning Director, which may be used for test driving. 14. All exterior lighting shall be oriented in a manner to avoid glare to neighboring residences. 15. Exterior phone bells, buzzers, public address systems, -or similar devices shall be prohibited. 16. Repair, service, and maintenance of vehicles shall be limited to minor repair. For the purposes of this conditional use permit minor repair consists of the removal of parts and accessories sold at this location and shall not include repair or service associated with the moving parts of the vehicles such as the engine, the wheels, or lubrication. Minor repair activities shall be conducted indoors with the doors closed. a. Painting shall be prohibited. 17. Storage of trucks, tractors, trailers, and RVs in the parking area or other location on the premises shall .be prohibited, Unloading of vehicles shall be prohibited on public streets. 18. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's Noise Ordinance, Article 19.5 of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, and shall not create a nuisance to the surrounding residential neighborhood and commercial establishments. Creatin oud or obnoxious noise shall be prohibited. a. Testing of vehicle alarms shall be prohibited except within the building with all doors and windows closed. b. Violation of the noise ordinance shall be grounds for revocation of the conditional use permit. 19. The exterior of the premises including the parking areas, the public sidewalk, and on -street parking areas in front of the establishment shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 at all times. Loitering or the conducting of business shall also be prohibited in these said areas. 20. Prior to the Conditional Use Permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 21. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 22. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed. necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. T3. There shall be a review of this Conditional Use Permit in six (6) months. Prior to that time the applicant shall submit for review by the Planning Commission a noise study prepared by an independent noise consultant which documents whether or not the operation of the business, including the customer traffic, is causing any violations of the City's Noise Ordinance. 24. All employees shall be given a copy of the Conditional Use Permit and shall acknowledge by signature that the Conditional Use Permit has been read and understood. 25. This resolution supersedes Resolution P.C. 90-7. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1990, by following vote: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: p/pers638 040-th CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY g 84CHOROOND i14 T ER /il l 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 90-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUESTED AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW MOTORCYCLE REPAIR AT 638-640 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, DESCRIBED AS LOT 18 AND PORTION OF LOT 19, WILSON AND LIND'S TRACT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17, and August 21, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for a Conditional Use permit amendment at 638-640 Pacific Coast Highway and made the following Findings: A. The proposed business would cater to customers arriving and leaving on motorcycles will thereby creating an non-mitigable noise problem which will result in a nuisance to nearby residences; B. The proposed use is not compatible with surrounding land uses; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby deny a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow Motorcycle repair at 638-640 Pacific Coast Highway. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Peirce,Rue,Chmn.Ketz NOES: Comm.Moore ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Ingell CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-57 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of August 21, 1990.-._; Christine Ketz, Vice Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary Date -9 p/pers638 X11 o ! o (0 3 8 - CO 4 o 17,C , 66,4Q o F -T — t�Po VL3*'� Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission (CONTINUED FROM THE JULY 17, 1990 MEETING) SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 90-19 LOCATION: 638-640 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY APPLICANT: WILLIAM CAMPBELL AND MAIKO SARAVIO 513 DIANTHUS MANHATTAN BEACH, CA August 15, 1990 Regular Meeting of August 21, 1990 REQUEST: AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING C.U.P. TO ALLOW SALES OF MOTORCYCLES, ACCESSORIES, AND MINOR REPAIR Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a Conditional Use Permit amendment subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. ALTERNATIVE Deny the request because of the unique and unusual noise characteristics of motorcycles and the proximity of residential uses. Background On July 17, 1990, the Planning Commission continued this request because of concerns about noise, and to obtain more information. For further background please refer to the attached 7/17/90 Planning Commission report. Analysis In response to concerns previously noted by the Planning Commission the applicant has indicated that he is willing to place the following restrictions on his business: 1. Customers arriving on motorcycles would not be allowed to use the rear parking area. This would be controlled by a chain across the driveway monitored by an attendant. 2. Baffles would be temporarily installed on motordycles using the driveway to get to the service area. 3. Hours of operation would be limited to Monday through Saturday from 10:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. and on Sunday from 10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. The applicant has indicated that he contacted noise consultants to prepare a noise study for the proposed business. However, none were willing to conduct a study for this type of business because of the unpredictability of use and operation. Apparently, according to the applicant, the consultant's could conduct a study of this business only after it was opened for business. Staff has included additional recommended conditions in accordance with the applicant's suggestions. In regards to the bar and stools which have been provided inside the business, staff does not believe that a snack bar is an appropriate use in conjunction with the a sales business of this type, as it would constitute a snack bar. There is clearly not adequate parking to support the assembly potential of this bar with stools. Therefore, staff is recommending a condition that snacks cannot be sold, and that no seating be provided around the bar. Only complementary beverages may be provided for customers of the business. Even with these conditions staff is concerned about the assembly potential of this business because of the variety of items to be sold and services offered, and the potential violations of the City's noise ordinance that may be caused by customers. Therefore, potential loitering and noise problems may occur which will require excessive Police support to control and monitor. As such staff is also recommending a condition that the Police Chief will have the authority to require the presence of a police approve security personnel, paid for by the applicant. As additional protection the Planning Commission may wish to require that the applicant provide the City with a security performance bond that the Police Department may draw upon should excessive Police services be required to monitor and control the premises. Such a condition has been included in the attached resolution. Also staff is recommending a condition to require a 6 -month review of the business, which shall include an independent noise consultant's study of the business to be paid for by the applicant. It should be noted that the Planning Commission is also considering an interpretation of the zoning ordinance to include motorcycle sales, and retail sales of motorcycle parts and accessories within the same category of automobiles on, the permitted use list. This would mean that motorcycle sales may be permitted with a C.U.P., and parts and accessories sales would be permitted as a matter of right. Obviously, the approval of this C.U.P. is contingent upon such an interpretation. Motorcycle repair is already listed as a use which may be permitted with a C.U.P. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staf report of 7/17/90 for further analysis. CONCUR Mich ael-Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution P.C. 2. Before and after photos of site 3. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 7/17/90 4. Resolution P.C. 90-7 5. P.C. Minutes/Staff Report 1/16/90 6. Application 7. Correspondence - /3 - erts Associate Planner a/pcsr638 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STAFF P2oPosES Qa_sow-noel of A-Pp20VAl— RESOLUTION P.C. 90-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE SALE OF MOTORCYCLES, ACCESSORIES, AND MINOR REPAIR AT 638-640 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, DESCRIBED AS LOT 18 AND PORTION OF LOT 19, WILSON AND LIND'S TRACT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17, and August 21, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for a Conditional Use permit at 638-640 Pacific Coast Highway and made the following Findings: A. The applicant has remodeled an existing one-story commercial building which reduced the total square footage of the building and created parking; B. The Planning Commission has previously approved a proposed use for an automobile sales agency, and the new owner is requesting to conduct a motorcycle sales agency; C. The proposed use is consistent with surrounding commercial uses; D. The imposition of conditions will mitigate any significant impacts associated with the proposed use; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow the sale of motorcycles, accessories and minor repair at 638-640 Pacific Coast Highway, subject to the following conditions: 1. The location of structures and features on the property shall be in accordance with submitted plans and the conditions below; any modification shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. 2. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 10:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. on Monday through Saturday and from 10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. on Sundays. 3. The applicant shall provide six (6) parking spaces for automobiles as shown on the site plan for employee and customer use. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a. All parking spaces shall be properly striped with appropriate signs posted indicating that the spaces are for employee and customer use only. b. Vehicles for sale shall be displayed inside the building. Vehicles for sale shall not be parked in the required parking area, driveway, or on the public sidewalk. c. All parking areas shall be maintained free of unregistered and derelict vehicles or parts at all times. 4. The rear parking area shall be prohibited for use by customers arriving on motorcycles. To prevent the parking of motorcycles the driveway access shall be blocked with a chain or other impediment, which is monitored by an attendant to allow the use of parking area by automobiles. 5. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant/owner to ensure that motorcycles parked on the public street in front of the establishment are parked in an orderly manner, and do not interfere with normal pedestrian or traffic flow. 6. Motorcycles to be serviced shall enter the building through the front door, unless they are walked to the rear with the engines turned -off, or unless sound baffles are temporarily installed on the motorcycles to reach the service area in the rear. 7. Seating around the counter/"bar" installed in the interior of the business shall be removed and prohibited. Snacks and/or beverages shall not be sold or distributed freely from the premises, and only beverages may be offered 'on a complementary basis to customers. a. Congregations of individuals for the purpose of eating, drinking or conversation is prohibited b. Advertising the availability of snacks or beverages is prohibited. 8. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists whether due to noise caused by customers, or loitering, and may require the presence of a police approved security personnel, to be paid for by the applicant/owner. a) The applicant/owner shall provide a security performance bond, at an amount to be determined by the Police Chief, to cover any excess cost to the City of excessive police service necessary to control noise or loitering problems on, or adjacent to, the establishment. 9. All the signs shall comply with the City's Sign Ordinance. 10. The public right-of-way shall not be used for the parking or storing of vehicles that are intended for sale, detailing, or other purposes. -/5- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11. Test driving of vehicles on local residential streets shall be prohibited. Revving or testing of engines on the premises, or on the public sidewalk or on -street parking areas in front of the establishment shall be prohibited. 12. The landscaping shall be maintained along the east property line to provide a buffer zone from the residential properties. a. An automatic landscape sprinkler system shall be provided. 13. There shall be a sign posted in the sales office directing the customers to the route, approved by the Planning Director, which may be used for test driving. 14. All exterior lighting shall be oriented in a manner to avoid glare to neighboring residences. 15. Exterior phone bells, buzzers, public address systems, or similar devices shall be prohibited. 16. Repair, service, and maintenance of vehicles shall not be conducted on the premises, except for minor repair and installation of parts and accessories. For the purposes of this conditional use permit minor repair consists of the removal and installation of parts and accessories sold at this location and shall not include repair or service associated with the moving parts of the vehicles such as the engine, the wheels, or lubrication. Minor repair activities shall be conducted indoors with the doors closed. a. Painting shall be prohibited. 17. Storage of trucks, tractors, trailers, and RVs in the parking area or other location on the premises shall be prohibited, Unloading of vehicles shall be prohibited on public streets. 18. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's Noise Ordinance, Article 19.5 of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, and shall not create a nuisance to the surrounding residential neighborhood and commercial establishments. Creating loud or obnoxious noise shall be prohibited. a. Testing of vehicle alarms shall be prohibited except within the building with all doors and windows closed. b. Violation of the noise ordinance shall be grounds for revocation of the conditional use permit. 19. The exterior of the premises including the parking areas, the public sidewalk, and on -street parking areas in front of the establishment shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. Loitering or the conducting of business shall also be prohibited in these said areas. -47 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 t CT 20. Prior to the Conditional Use Permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 21. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 22. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 23. There shall be a review of this Conditional Use Permit in six (6) months. Prior to that time the applicant shall submit for review by the Planning Commission a noise study prepared by an independent noise consultant which documents whether or not the operation of the business, including the customer traffic, is causing any violations of the City's Noise Ordinance. 24. All employees shall be given a copy of the Conditional Use Permit and shall acknowledge by signature that the Conditional Use Permit has been read and understood. 25. This resolution supersedes Resolution P.C. 90-7. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-57 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of August 21, 1990. Scott Ingell, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary Date p/pers638 -r7 July 11, 1990 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission July 17, 1990 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 90-19 LOCATION: 638-640 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY APPLICANT: WILLIAM CAMPBELL AND MAIKO SARAVIO 513 DANTHUS MANHATTAN BEACH, CA REQUEST: AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING C.U.P. TO ALLOW SALES OF MOTORCYCLES, ACCESSORIES, AND MINOR REPAIR Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a Conditional Use Permit amendment subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. ALTERNATIVES 1. Continue the request to require a subsequent environmental assessment of the potential noise impacts associated with the testing and test driving of motorcycles. 2. Deny the request because of the unique and unusual noise characteristics of motorcycles and the proximity of residential uses. Background PROJECT INFORMATION: Zoning: S.P.A. 7 General Plan Designation: Commercial Corridor Present Use: Vacant Building Size: 2400 Square Feet Parking Spaces: 6 Environmental Determination: Categorically Exempt as Negative Declaration was approved for existing C.U.P. On January 16, 1990, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit and a negative declaration for the remodel of the existing structure for an Automobile Agency with the operation to be conducted indoors. The original owner of the property has since sold the property and the rights to the C.U.P. to another party. The new owner of the property has completed the bulk of the proposed building plan that was approved as part of the C.U.P. The structure has been rehabilitated and reduced in size. A much improved facade has been constructed and a paved parking area has been provided in the rear to provide parking for a building which previously had none. Analysis The applicant is proposing a business which involves the sale of used late model, customized, Harley Davidson motorcycles, and would include the sale of parts and accessories. Also, the applicant is requesting to conduct light repair. The zoning ordinance does not specifically identify motorcycle sales on the permitted use list, although motorcycle repair is identified, subject to a C.U.P. Automobile, boat and truck sales are identified, and permitted with a C.U.P. In staff's judgement motorcycle sales is sufficiently similar to auto, boat, or truck sales to enable the Planning Commission to interpret motorcycle sales as a permitted use, subject to a C.U.P. The sale and repair services would all be conducted indoors in the same areas previously approved for sale of automobiles. Given that the approved C.U.P. was also for motor vehicles, staff determined that this request would be similar in impact and, therefore, processed it as an amendment to the existing C.U.P. without any additional environmental assessment. After further examination of the request, staff believes that the motorcycle business actually may result in greater noise impacts than the approved automobile business because of the nature of the vehicles. It should be noted that noise limits for motor vehicles on the public right-of-way, as stated in City's noise ordinance, are regulated by the California Vehicle Code. Therefore, only the noise generated from the subject property is subject to the decibel limits of the noise ordinance. Staff believes these impacts can be mitigated through the conditions of a C.U.P. with the cooperation of the business owner. Such conditions would prohibit the testing or the revving up of engines on the premises. The Planning Commission, however, may determine_. that the difference between motorcycles and automobiles is significant enough to warrant further environmental assessment, and perhaps a noise study, prior to a making a final decision. - f q - Otherwise, the business is properly located in the highest intensity commercial area in the City and is surrounded by similar automotive related uses. The building has been improved and adequate landscaping has been provided in the rear. If there is to be a motorcycle business in the City, this is the appropriate location. The proposed building and the site are clearly adequate in size to support this business, with adequate indoor area to conduct minor repair work. Staff has included several conditions in the attached recommended resolution to address potential problems associated with this business. These include a limitation on the light repair to only consist of the removal and installation of motorcycle accessories and parts not related to the moving parts of the vehicle such as the engine and wheels and lubrication, and that such work may only be conducted inside, with the doors closed. Also, standard conditions normally associated with auto agencies have been included to prohibit test driving of vehicles on residential streets and to prohibit engine revving on the premises. Additionally, the rear parking area shall remain clear of all parts and merchandise, shall be for parking only, and loitering shall be prohibited. Also, the requirement for a three month review is included. Attached is a letter from the adjacent property owner regarding a private easement for ingress and egress on the southerly 10 -feet of the subject property. This is essentially a private matter between adjacent property owners. However, in response to the concerns of Mr. McNeill no part of the easement is proposed for parking, and conditions are included which prohibit the use of the parking area for merchandise display. Whether or not the rear end of this easement can be used for a trash enclusure is arguable and is a private matter. If it cannot be used for a dumpster an alternative location on the site will have to be found to satisfy the City's requirement for an ems, -sed trash dumpster. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments �cKen R'• o ertson i 1. Resolution P.C. 2. Before and after photos of site 3. Resolution P.C. 90-7 4. P.C. Minutes/Staff Report 1/16/90 5. Application 6. Correspondence 7. Public Notice Affidavit -20- Associate Planner a/pcsr638 Comrn_fiue noted that it -is important for the Commission to address uses which would abet the environent. Comm. Moore, noting that the need for new public hearings. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: AABSENT' ti nal use permit itself .r. -'deprotection. disagreed with Comms. RueePe•• e. Chinn. Ketz Comr— ore None Comm. Ingell CUP 90-19 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW SALES OF MOTORCYCLES, ACCESSORIES, AND MINOR REPAIR AT 638 - 640 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. SOUTH BAY CYCLES (CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF JULY 17. 19901 Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated August 15, 1990. Staff' recommended that the Planning Commission approve a conditional use permit amendment, subject to the conditions specified in the proposed resolution. As an alternative, the Commission could deny the request because of the unique and unusual noise characteristics of motorcycles and the proximity of residential uses. On July 17. 1990, the Planning Commission continued this request because of concerns related to noise and to obtain additional information. In response to concerns previously noted by the Planning Commission, the applicant has indicated that he is willing to place the following restrictions on his business: (1) Customers arriving on motorcycles would not be allowed to use the rear parking area. This would be controlled by a chain across the driveway monitored by an attendant; (2) Baffles would be temporarily installed on motorcycles using the driveway to get to the service area; and (3) Hours of operation would be limited to Monday through Saturday from 10:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. and on Sunday from 10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. The applicant has indicated that he contacted noise consultants to prepare a noise study for the proposed business. However, none were willing to conduct a study for this type of business because of the unpredictability of use and operation. Apparently, according to the applicant, the consultants could conduct a study of this business only after it was opened for business. Staff included several additional recommended conditions in accordance with the applicant's suggestions. In regard to the bar and stools which have been provided inside the business, staff does not believe that a snack bar is an appropriate use in conjunction with a sales business of this type, as it would constitute a snack bar. There is clearly not adequate parking to support the assembly potential of this bar with stools. Therefore, staff is recommending a condition that snacks cannot be sold, and there can be no seating around the bar. Only complimentary beverages may be provided for customers of the business. Even with these conditions, staff is concerned about the assembly potential of this business because of the variety of items to be sold and services offered and the potential violations of the City's noise ordinance that may be caused by customers. Therefore, potential loitering and noise problems may occur which will require excessive police support to control and monitor. As such, staff also recommended a condition that the police chief will have the authority to require the presence of police -approved security personnel, paid for by the applicant. As additional protection, the Planning Commission may wish to require that the applicant provide the City with a security performance bond that the P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 Police Department may draw upon should excessive police services be required to monitor and control the premises. Such a condition is included in the proposed resolution. Staff also recommended a condition to require a six-month review of the business, which shall include an independent noise consultant's study of the business to be paid for by the applicant. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Comm. Peirce, explained that a "baffle" is a device which can be added to a motorcycle's muffler system to reduce noise. Comm. Moore asked whether the City's noise ordinance includes provisions for a peak noise period or just an average. He noted that the average could be much too loud. Mr. Schubach explained that the noise ordinance has several standards which must be met, one of which is that the noise level must include peak noise periods as well as average periods. He stated that the noise must be within the standards during all periods. He said that the maximum level is 85 decibels. Comm. Peirce, noting that the Commission is now addressing a CUP for motorcycle repairs, asked whether parts sales should be considered in conjunction with the repair activity, to which Mr. Vose responded in the affirmative, but he explained that independent parts sales are not included in the use. Mr. Schubach stated that the parts in this case can be only an ancillary use, explaining that someone cannot just come in off the street and purchase motorcycle parts. - Public Hearing opened at 7:43 P.M. by Chinn. Ketz. Jack Wood, 200 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that the applicant made a good faith application for motorcycle sales, parts, and repairs, however, the applicant cannot proceed at this time due to a technicality; (2) said that the applicant would have applied for the appropriate permits had he known they were necessary. Mr. Vose clarified that, as a result of the interpretation of the Commission, the application is not permitted at this time since the sale of motorcycles is not on the permitted use list for this zone, since it is not being considered the same as automobile sales. He stated that, if motorcycle sales is added to the permitted use list at some future date, the applicant would then be able to proceed. He noted, however, that because of the ambiguity of the code at the present time, the applicant is precluded from engaging in motorcycle sales in this zone under any condition. Mr. Wood disagreed, stating that at the time the applicant applied for the permit, he was led to believe by staff that motorcycle sales was considered to be the same as automobile sales, to which Mr. Vose responded that the interpretation itself is a matter to be taken up by the Planning Commission. Mr. Wood stated that the applicant should be given an opportunity to conduct his entire operation; i.e., sales, repair, and service, to which Mr. Vose stated, then, that this request could be withdrawn until such time that the Commission makes a decision as to whether or not motorcycle sales should be added to the permitted use list. The applicant could then apply for the entire use as suggested. Mr. Wood said that they will stipulate that they will drop the request for motorcycle sales at this time and be heard only on the request for repairs. He said that the applicant will be broke by the time a decision is made. Mr. Wood stated that when he was consulted by the applicant on this proposed business, he told the applicant that it was the appropriate zone for such a use; however, he warned the applicant P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 —22 that a conditional use permit was required, permit. He advised that the city would find great obstacles would need to be surmounted. of money on this business, and he should continued by stating that they had to suggest and it would be very difficult to obtain such a motorcyclists unsuitable for the area; therefore, He noted that the applicant has spent a great deal be given an opportunity to start business. He conditions to staff for this project. Mr. Wood continued and stated that unless the applicant is given an opportunity to open, he cannot prove that the business can be operated within the guidelines of the city. He noted that Harley-Davidsons are legal in this state. He stated that the area is already very noisy, and the operation of this business will not affect the noise factor one way or the other. He noted that this is the appropriate zone in which to operate such a business. and mitigation measures should be imposed where they can. He said that many of the residents cannot be appeased, and he questioned whether the residents just want the building to remain vacant. Mr. Wood stated that the applicant is willing to keep the noise down and to provide a sound study; however, he must be given a chance to operate. He further noted that customers will not be allowed to operate on the streets; bikes will not be allowed to park in the rear; repairs will be done indoors and during normal business hours; and landscaping could also be added to mitigate the noise. Mr. Wood stated that the applicant has a right to operate under the constraints of a conditional use permit. He said that a business cannot be prohibited just because the city doesn't want it because it will create noise and density. He noted, however, that this business did not create the noise and density problems in the city. He said that the concept of a permitted use list having to specify every single permitted use is not appropriate because there are thousands of exceptions. Comm. Rue questioned, however, instances where a business is completely undesirable in a city, to which Mr. Wood responded that all uses are permitted except those which are illegal. Paul Hutchins, 1015 17th Street, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) supported approval of the project, stating that Harley-Davidson riders are upstanding citizens; (2) did not feel it is fair to persecute this applicant, especially when other businesses in the areaare creating problems; (3) stated that selling Harleys provides work for Americans; (4) said that Harleys are works of art and are very expensive; (5) commented that this shop would bring more business to the area; and (6) said that Harley riders are courteous. Mr. Vose clarified that the only issue that should be addressed at this time is the repair of motorcycles, not the sale. Dave Reimer 802 Monterey, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: • (1) stated that the only real issue is whether or not this business should be allowed to operate; (2) noted that the opposition is coming from neighbors who fear the image of motorcycle riders; (3) said that Harleys are very upscale, and this business will provide a service which is needed in the area; (4) disagreed with staffs recommendation that this business should be patrolled by the police, and noted that there should be more concern over the adult -type shops in the area; (5) discussed the issue of motorcycle repairs and stated that this will be a low-volume type business; (6) stressed that these are motorcycle artists, not grease monkeys; (7) stated that very expensive parts will be used, and the utmost care will be used in doing the repairs; (8) felt that these applicants should be given a chance to prove themselves to the surrounding neighbors. Craig McBride, 420 Manhattan Avenue, Manhattan Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that many cars are sold along the highway in the area; (2) said that his comments relate to all aspects of this business, not just repairs; (3) stated that what the city is doing with respect to this issue is ridiculous; (4) stated that illegal cars are being sold all along the highway; (5) said that this is a free country, and the applicants should be given a chance. P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 Roger Czuleger, 923 6th Street, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that the main issue is noise, however, people are complaining that their property values will be lowered; (2) stated that there is a difference between repairs and accessories; (3) disagreed with staffs recommendation to require police patrol, and suggested that the adult stores be monitored instead; (4) said that this business will not be a detriment to the neighborhood; (5) did not feel that the business will lower property values; (6) stated that the city should address more important issues. Alton Godson, 943 8th Street, Hermosa. Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that it is a matter of opinion as to what type of business will be a benefit or detriment to the neighborhood; (2) said that the main issue is noise; (3) stated that even though he feels Harleys are great bikes, they create too much noise; (4) did not feel that the issue is what types of people will frequent this business; (5) stated that the environmental issues must be addressed related to this proposed use; (6) noted that the economic concerns of the applicants are valid, however, the real issue is noise; (7) noted concern over reduced property values in relation to an increase in noise created by motorcycles; (8) felt that there are other more appropriate locations on the highway where motorcycle repairs could be done, noting that the noise from this particular location travels directly up the hill; (9) said that motorcycle repairs will draw additional motorcycles to the area, which will in turn create more noise. Larry Horowitz, 802 The Strand, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that a two -block area along the highway near this proposed business contains several boarded - up businesses, which is quite undesirable for any area; (2) noted concern over the loss of taxes generated from such businesses; (3) said that this business will cater to an upscale clientele, who will in tum spend their money at other locations in the city; (4) said he would rather spend his money in this town, as opposed to having to go to other cities for motorcycle repairs. George Laterra, 1906 McKay, addressed the Commission and felt that the applicants should be given a chance to operate their business. Steve Constantine, 836 1st Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) said he lives in the hill section, and the only noise he hears is from the ambulances and police cars; (2) favored approval of this request, stating that it would bring him more income as well, since he owns an auto detail business in the city; (3) felt that the applicants should be given a chance to operate. Rah Jiu, Manhattan Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that the applicant is very hard-working and should be given a chance; (2) did not feel that motorcycles would decrease the property value in this area; (3) felt that there is a need in the city for this type of business. Gaylin King, 72 The Strand, addressed the Commission and: (1) described her childhood terror of motorcyclists; (2) did not want today's children to be afraid, as she was; (3) did not feel that either motorcycle sales or repairs are conducive to a quiet family neighborhood. Mark Mason, 420 15th Street, Manhattan Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that there is a stigma attached to Harley riders; (2) stated that this business will not attract undesirables. Gary Ferguson, 819 North Harbor Drive, Redondo Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) supported approval of the repair shop; (2) felt that the applicants have not been treated fairly; (3) said that he rides a Harley, and he would like to have a repair shop in the area; (4) said that the applicants are very conscientious; (5) noted that the applicants have posted signs in an attempt to mitigate noise; (6) hoped that the Commission would approve this request. Jeannine Bringman, 831 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that personalities, cultural backgrounds, and nationality or make of vehicle are not at issue here; (2) noted that the real issue is that of noise which did not exist before this shop existed; (3) stated that the noise will continue once this shop is operating; (4) noted that things have already started happening, and if caution is not used now, there will be great difficulty in P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 curbing problems in the future; (5) opposed approval of the CUP, based solely on the issue of increased noise. Lars Jacobsen, 600 and 700 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) said his business is very close to the proposed business; (2) favored approval, stating that this business will be of benefit to the area; (3) stated that if all the shops looked as attractive as this one, property values in the area would increase. Don Turk, 839 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) favored approval of the shop; (2) said it would be convenient to have a shop in the city; (3) noted that the noise is louder during the summer when there is more traffic in general, and this business should therefore not be held responsible for the noise. Robert Roselle, 772 18th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) described his terrifying experience with motorcyclists many years ago; (2) noted, however, that along with his prejudice against motorcyclists, he has strong prejudices in favor of free enterprise; (3) said that the noise problem can be mitigated and can be checked for enforcement; (4) felt that if the applicants are willing to cooperate, they should be given a chance to operate within the guidelines of the city's noise ordinance Robert Chamberlain, 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that his business is very close to the proposed business; (2) noted that there are more problems associated with the adult stores in the area than with anything else; (3) stated that the applicants are young and energetic and should be given a chance to operate. - - Jim Wagner, 25th Street, Manhattan Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that he owns a Harley; (2) said that Harleys are superior to the Japanese competition; (3) stated that Harley riders are very courteous and do not cause disturbances; (4) said that many Harley riders are professional people who enjoy the camaraderie; (5) said that the real issue at hand is noise; (6) said that the noise was measured by the applicant at the shop, and the street noise, especially from buses, was much noisier than the shop itself; (7) outlined the various readings which were obtained during the noise test, stating that the Harleys were measured at 84 decibels, much lower than other noises in the area; (8) stated that the Harley noise level is within the city's noise ordinance; (9) stated that there is a problem related to the public's misconception of Harley riders. Susan Grafton, 802 Monterey, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that the noise will remain whether or not this business is approved; (2) said that people who live near the commercial areas must learn to live with the noise problems. Leroy Barnum, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that additional noise in the area would just create more problems; (2) hoped that these applicants were not mislead into thinking that they could operate here; (3) said that the business has already opened. Don Karosevich, 840 15th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) had no doubt that this is an upscale shop; (2) noted concern over the noise and stated that the issue is an environmental matter; (3) said that a mistake was already made with the Hermosa Beach Pavilion and he hoped that a mistake would not be made here; (4) said that the police cannot adequately enforce the noise ordinance; (5) said that the business will draw additional bikes to the area; (6) said that the installation of baffles will only temporarily address the problem, explaining that the noise will continue down the highway; (7) asked that the Commission consider the surrounding neighbors in respect to the noise factor. William Campbell, applicant, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that he has posted a sign noting rules to be followed by customers; (2) explained that free baffles will be installed to those coming into the shop; (3) stated that he intends to run an upscale store; (4) stated that his offer to install free baffles would actually be a benefit to the city, rather than a detriment. P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 Scott Devereaux, 812 4th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) favored approval of the request; (2) said he will be one of the first customers of the business, especially so that he can get the free baffles installed; (3) said that this is a very attractive shop, and the property values must be going up, rather than down; (4) said that the car wash next door creates more noise than this business would. Linda Matarazza addressed the Commission and: (1) said that her children are not afraid of motorcycles; (2) said that the applicants are reputable businessmen; (3) said there are more problems with the porno shops than with this type of business; (4) noted that no test driving will be allowed; (5) felt that the applicants should be given a chance to operate. Dave Reimer, 802 Monterey, addressed the Commission and asked if Harleys are so noisy, why weren't they heard tonight when people drove up to City Hall. Jim Sullivan, 1051 8th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that the issue has nothing to do with the character or integrity of Harley riders; (2) said that the main issue is noise; (3) noted that the applicants are willing to accept restrictive conditions; (4) noted concern over people riding bikes up and down his street; (5) felt that if the applicants are willing to accept the restrictive conditions, they should be given an opportunity to operate; (6) noted that the City can enforce the conditions; (7) suggested that the applicants be required to post a bond or accept monetary penalties if they do not comply. William Campbell, applicant, stated that he is willing to put something in writing, and he will agree to a six-month review of the business. He stressed that he needs an opportunity to prove the business, and regular business hours will be followed. Bob Bringman, 831 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that he has called other Harley shops and found out that Harleys register 85 decibels on the noise meter when they are factory made with stock mufflers; (2) noted, however, that after -market mufflers can be added later which are much louder; (3) described various additions which can be made and which can register up to 125 decibels; (4) said that he was informed by Commander Altfeld of the Police Department that the noise should not exceed 65 decibels on the highway, but he was informed by Comm. Moore that that is the average, not the peak; (5) said that it is a popular practice to install after -factory pipes which are much louder; (6) noted concern over the noise along the highway; (7) noted concern over motorcycles accelerating away from the business. Mary Herbert, 825 7th Street, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) opposed the additional noise; (2) agreed that the business is attractive, but it has generated additional noise already, even though it is not officially opened. Mike D'Auteuil, 831 8th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that the noise cannot be controlled now; (2) said that this is not a question of who rides or buys Harleys; (3) said that the applicant will have no control over the riders once they leave the shop; (4) stated that there has been a noticeable impact on traffic generated by this business already; (5) noted concern over bikes accelerating away from the front of this business, explaining that the noise travels right up the hill and does not dissipate; (6) said that this shop will generate too many bikes to the shop; (7) urged the Commissioners to allow only compatible uses in the community, of which this is not; (8) asked that this request be denied. Clayton Searing, Redondo Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that the applicants have agreed to do everything possible to reduce noise; (2) felt that the applicants should be given an opportunity to prove themselves. Tony Vallejos, 809 Cypress, addressed the Commission and: (1) saw no reason why this applicant should be denied; (2) noted that this is a very small congested city; (3) favored approval, stating that this business will be good for the community. P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 26 Allison D'Auteuil, 831 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) opposed approval of the permit; (2) said that the business has already opened, and the noise and traffic has increased dramatically; (3) said that bikes are already gathering; (4) noted that many restrictions can be added to a CUP, but she questioned the reality of actual enforcement of the conditions; (5) displayed a photo depicting at least a dozen bikes parked in front of the shop; (6) noted concern over the number of bikes, even before the official opening; (7) said that the bikes come and go as a group, and the noise is unacceptable. Michelle Campbell, wife of the applicant, addressed the Commission and: (1) explained that they are already open because they have received approval to sell motorcycle apparel, however, one cannot make a living on that alone; (2) stressed that they must be given a chance; (3) stated that they were practically told by the Planning Department that there would be no problem converting from an auto brokerage firm to a motorcycle sales shop; (4) stated that they are attempting to make a living, and they are running out of funds; (5) said that there are already motorcycles on the highway, and they are not there just because of this store; (6) said that other business owners in the area have not noticed any increased noise. Ann O'Dell, 831 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that much of the testimony has been given by non-residents of the city (2) said that this shop has already created a great impact on the neighborhood; (3) noted that the motorcycle noise is already so loud that conversation must be halted when the bikes are coming and going; (4) presented a petition with 118 signatures of people opposed to the granting of the proposed repair shop; (5) read aloud the wording on the petition and submitted it to the Planning Director. Maiko Saravia, applicant, addressed the Commission and: (1) stressed that this business will remain, no matter what action they must take; (2) urged that everyone work together to find a solution to the problem; (3) asked that they be allowed to open so that they can prove themselves; (4) noted that the business can be reviewed, and if it is not in compliance, then it can be shut down; (5) said that they are willing to sign any type of agreement so that they can open; (6) stressed that they cannot survive economically unless they are allowed to operate; (7) stated that they are attempting to control the noise at the business, noting that signs have been posted; (8) said that he was under the impression that America is the land of opportunity, and he asked for the chance to open the business; (9) stated that the city needs this type of business; (10) said that they cannot survive by selling only motorcycle clothing; (11) said that they cannot be expected to provide baffles to everyone on the highway, (12) said that this will be the first motorcycle shop in Hermosa Beach, even if it takes them twenty years to obtain approval. Lee Barrett, 991 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) noted concern over possible approval, stating that he does not feel it would be good for the city; (2) questioned how the noise could be reduced up and down the streets, even if baffles are provided and installed; (3) stated that the quality of life issue must be taken into account; (4) felt that approval"of this use would only be detrimental; (5) stated that if this business is approved it would only further erode the quality of life in the city; (6) felt that Hermosa tends to be more lax on these issues, compared to other surrounding cities. Rick Green, 3200 Manhattan Avenue, addressed the Commission and favored approval of the request, stating that he feels the noise problems can be mitigated. Jim Housley, 934 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that the applicants are very convincing about their being able to control the noise; (2) noted concern, however, that they cannot actually control the noise at all; (3) noted that if the CUP is granted, it would be nearly impossible to shut this business down if problems do arise. Ernie O'Dell, 931 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that the intent is not to close businesses down; (2) felt, however, that businesses should be compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods; (3) felt that the noise issue would make this use incompatible with the surrounding area; (4) felt that if auto sales exceed the approved noise levels, they too should be denied; (5) noted that certain uses, such as jet engine repairs, are legal, however, they are not P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 compatible with neighborhoods; (6) felt that the conditional use permit process is in place to address the issue of compatibility. Al Huber, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) felt that the noise created by this shop would impact only a few surrounding neighbors; (2) said that he has noticed no difference in the traffic and noise created by this shop; (3) stated that other existing uses are much more incompatible this the proposed use; (4) favored approval of the request. Sherry Colburn, 839 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) noted concern over the noise created by motorcycles; (2) said that if something could be done to guarantee that the noise would not travel up the hill, she would not be opposed, however, she did not feel that there is any such guarantee available. Gerry Compton, 832 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that most of the noise generated by this business will occur on weekends and during the evenings, and he feels this would present a major problem to the neighboring residents; (2) said that the noise level on the highway is already above the acceptable limit, and adding to it would be inappropriate; (3) stated that this business has disregarded the city's rules and regulations, noting that they blatantly stocked their shop with motorcycles and accessories when they had received approval only to sell clothing; (4) said that if the applicants are unwilling to comply with the requirements of a simple business license, it seems likely that they would not comply with the requirements of a complicated conditional use permit. Mr. Compton continued and: (1) noted concern over the possible test drive route; (2) noted concern over the lack of control of riders on the side streets in the area; (3) doubted whether the bikes could be confined only to the highway; (4) did not feel mitigating circumstances are available related to the noise generated by this shop; (5) said that the owners are also violating the city's parking requirements, because several bikes are being parked in each space and there has been parking on the driveway. Mr. Compton continued and: (1) doubted whether anyone would want to live so close to this type of business; (2) noted concern over reduced property values as a result of this shop; (3) stated that the applicants have proved that they cannot control their customers; (4) referred to the previously submitted petition and explained that all 118 signatures were from people living in the immediate vicinity; (5) noted that only apparel is being sold, and the noise is unbearable, and he questioned how much it would increase if repairs and sales are approved. Mr. Compton continued and: (1) described a tape he made depicting a biker social in Hollywood; (2) noted concern over the location of the proposed shop in relation to the surrounding businesses; (3) referred to the actual conditions of the CUP and noted the difficulty in enforcing noise limits; (4) said that no testimony has been presented giving proof of the actual loudness of the bikes themselves; (5) noted that no sound study has been provided; (6) questioned what the noise limit is in the city, noting that the bikes must exceed that limit; (7) questioned where the test route will be located; (8) expressed sympathy for the owners and their monetary outlay, however, he felt it was a mistake for them to proceed before obtaining approval; (9) noted, though, that he has more concern for the potential decrease in property values in the area; (10) stated that threats against the neighbors are not appropriate under any circumstances; (11) felt that the applicants have been misled in regard to their being able to obtain approval for this business. Mr. Compton concluded and: (1) noted that even if there is already traffic, more traffic will be created by this business; (2) noted concern over bikes accelerating away from the front of this business and the attendant noise; (3) referred to the city vision and stated that this use does not add to the community vision. Gene Rock, El Segundo, addressed the Commission and: (1) did not understand why the city is so hard on applicants; (2) noted that the applicants are willing to comply with the P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 C requirements; (3) expressed anger that applicants are not able to operate, and he felt that they should be given a chance. Jackie Tagliaferro, 934 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) noted that most of the speakers who favored approval do not even live near the shop; (2) noted concern over the noise in the area; (3) opposed approval, based solely on the issue of noise. Patty Adams, 427 Manhattan Avenue, addressed the Commission and: (1) sympathized with the surrounding neighbors, however, she felt that the city needs this business; (2) stated that this business will bring in people who will spend additional money elsewhere in the city while they are in town. Jack Wood, on behalf of the applicant, addressed the Commission and: (1) noted that this is a difficult issue; (2) stated that this country was built on the free enterprise system and democracy; (3) asked that the rhetoric surrounding motorcycle riders be disregarded; (4) suggested instead that the focus be on whether or not this business should be allowed to open; (5) said that the neighbors moved to the area knowing full well that they were near a commercial area; (6) stated that businesses, rather than homeowners, pay the bulk of taxes in any city; (7) said that this has become a battle between the residents and the business; (8) stressed that this is not residential neighborhood, but rather a commercial area with residential near it; (9) said that the applicants should be given an opportunity to operate their business within certain reasonable guidelines. Public Hearing closed at 9:43 P.M. by Chinn. Ketz. Comm. Peirce asked questions related to the noise limit for automotive uses, to which Mr. Schubach replied that he was not certain of the State requirements; however, the city's maximum limit is measured from the property line. He stated that the city's noise code relates to private property, and the Motor Vehicle Code addresses vehicular noise. He explained that both the local police and the highway patrol have purview over the enforcement of the noise codes. Comm. Rue noted that in every CUP hearing, standards must be addressed that relate to issues such as noise. Comm Peirce felt that if the motorcycles are eliminated from the rear parking lot and the garage doors are kept closed, noise in those areas could be reduced. He felt, however, that there is no mitigation measure for the noise which is created as the motorcycles pull away from the street in front of this shop to merge into traffic. He therefore pointed out that if the shop were not there, these bikes would not be pulling away from the front of it. He felt that this issue is indeed within the purview of the Planning Commission in this regard and should be addressed. He continued by stating that if the noise problem cannot be mitigated, the use should not be permitted and the conditional use permit should not be approved. He stated that things which interfere with the neighbors cannot be allowed. Chmn. Ketz felt that the noise will exceed the maximum levels allowed by the city, and she did not feel that the noise can be mitigated. She felt that this business would pose a real problem for the surrounding neighbors, and she did not feel that baffles would solve the problem. Comm. Peirce commented that no solid proof has been presented related to the noise. He noted that even if one Harley is right at the acceptable level of 85 decibels, several Harleys traveling together with a reading of 85 decibels would be unacceptable. He stated that he would vote against approval unless he can be convinced that there is a mitigation fpr noise as bikes pull away from the front of the shop. Comm Moore stated that it is clear that many businesses can attract motorcycles which will pull away and create noise. He had hoped that more information had been presented related to P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 police problems and their experience to date in trying to enforce motorcycle standards on the streets of this city, to which Mr. Schubach replied that he knows of no such data. Comm. Moore stated that he did not feel the noise impact of this business can be completely mitigated; however, he felt that it can be mitigated to some extent, particularly on the grounds of the property itself. He felt that the suggested restrictions in the CUP are adequate and enforceable for the grounds of the business itself. He stated, though, that the topic of noise generated as a result of additional motorcycles coming to this business is still at issue, and he could see no mitigation measure for this occurrence. He did not, however, find that to be enough of a reason to deny this request. Comm. Moore noted that Hermosa Beach is a very small city; however, when it became a city, a choice was made to take on the responsibility of providing all types of businesses which are appropriate in cities. He stated that this is a legitimate business, and it deserves a place in any city, including Hermosa Beach. He could think of no other location in town that would be more appropriate than that which is now being proposed. Comm. Moore stated that he could support approval of the repair business, with the conditions imposed by staff. He said that it is the responsibility of the Commission to review the suggested conditions themselves to determine whether they are adequate to mitigate the problems, not to completely reject the use altogether. Jack Wood, on behalf of the applicant, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that if the business were allowed to open, a survey could be done to determine the number of motorcycles coming to the business; (2) noted, however, that no such numbers can be obtained if the business is not operating; (3) felt that pertinent data would be valuable in making a decision; (4) noted that the applicants can tell their customers the importance of adhering to the rules; (5) stated that the applicant should be given the chance to enforce the conditions; (6) said that the business can be monitored to ensure compliance; (7) noted that if compliance is not possible, the business could be reviewed and closed. Chmn. Ketz noted that two public hearings have been held on this issue, and no specific data has thus far been presented. Mr. Wood countered by stating that the only way the data can be provided is to actually monitor the business itself. He further noted that the number of bikes traveling up and down the side streets can be measured. Mr. Vose advised that the public hearing should be reopened if the Commission chooses to hear more testimony. Chmn. Ketz and Comm. Peirce both agreed that they had heard enough testimony upon which to base their decisions. Comm. Peirce explained that he reached his decision on the fact that, even though additional data could be gathered, all of the information must be examined. His conclusion is that people leaving the shop create noise to the effect that there can be no mitigation. He noted, however, that he would be willing to continue the matter in order to receive additional information on noise, but nothing else. He stressed that he does not feel there is a mitigation measure for noise created by bikes leaving the front of the shop. He felt that enough testimony has been heard already on the other issues. Comm. Rue agreed that the main issue is noise, and no objective data has been presented. He said that this business is open and selling apparel. Testimony has been given that .the noise is getting worse. He felt that this use is intrusive for the neighborhood, and based on the testimony already received, he said he would vote against approval. He further felt that the applicant would prefer that this matter not be continued again in order that the matter may be appealed directly to the City Council for decision. 3 0 -- P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 Comm. Rue felt that there are other locations in other cities which are appropriate for intense uses such as the one being proposed. He stated that if additional information related specifically to the noise only could be provided, he would not object to another continuance. Chmn. Ketz preferred to vote on the matter at this time, noting that it has been discussed at several public hearings already. MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Chmn. Ketz, to deny approval of the conditional use permit, based on the fact that the noise generated from the motorcycles pulling away from the front of the shop cannot be mitigated. Comm. Moore asked whether Comm. Peirce was referring to noise coming from the business itself, or noise created by customers coming to the business from the highway, to which Comm. Peirce replied that he does not choose to make a differentiation in his motion because he felt that they are part and parcel of the same thing. Comm. Moore disagreed, stating that that fact is very important, noting that the conditions presented very clearly show that the noise on the property itself can be managed and can be enforced. He felt that Comm. Peirce's concerns relate to noise created by customers leaving the property, not noise on the property itself. Comm. Rue did not feel that the accumulation of the noise can be mitigated or controlled in any event. He did not feel that the owners can control the noise generated by the business. AYES: Comms. Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ketz NOES: Comm. Moore ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Ingell Chmn. Ketz announced that the decision of the Planning Commission can be appealed by writing to the City Council within ten days. Recess taken from 10:05 P.M. until 10:13 P.M. Chmn. Ketz explained to the audience the Commission's policy of not meeting past midnight. Noting the lateness bfthe hour, she asked whether anyone would beit�ested in having their item continued to the next meeting, to which one person responded that he would favor a continuance of Agenda Item '14(a). SUB 86-2 -- SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE REVISED GRADING PLAN FOR AN EIGHT -LOT SUBDIVISION AT 532. 534. AND 540 20TH STREET. COMMONLY KNOWN AS 'THE POWER STREET SUBDIVISION'"ECO NTINUED FROM MEETINGS OF 4/ 3/90. 5/1/90.AND6/5/901 Mr. Schubach gave staff report. -dated August 16, 1990, and recommended that this item be continued to a date certain.. It was also recommended that this be the last continuance on this issue, and that if nothing is received, a focused E.I.R. should be required:,, The Planning Commission continued this item from the April 3, 1990, meeting et,because the developer had provided inadequate information upon which to base a decision. The .developer was requested to work with the Department of Public Works to generate sufficient information on drainage and storm sewer capacity so the Commission could make a determination as to -the level of environmental impact. P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 -31- Gerry Compton, 200 Pier Avenue, project architect, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that the trees in rear d will be shown on the landscape plan, as well as those which need to be removed and replaced; (2) o cted to staffs commendation that the shower be removed from the ground-floor level of Unit B; (3) in ponse to questions fro Comm. Moore, discussed the issue of privacy walls and their effectiveness, and he s that he has heard no complaintsfrom owners of other similar units; (4) explained that this 30- by 100-foot to is a configuration which is difficult to k with, especially in regard to obtaining open space on the ground; 55'noted that on lots of this size, it is necessary to an across the units to provide adequate open space; (6) rela e to the staff-recommended condition that the bathroom i nit B be removed, explained that there is a bedroprh very close to that bathroom, and there is no logic in requiring im.rernoval, thereby making it necessary for a to have to cross the entire unit to get to a bathroom; (7) noted that UniCA,does not have a bathroom on the i .und floor simply because there was not enough room. Public Hearing closed at 7:21 P.M. by Chmn. Inge Comm. Peirce, noting that he usually objects to bath o.ms has no objection because the area is very small . a . is not likely the ground floor, stated that in this particular case he come a bootleg unit. MOTION by Comm. Peirce, secondee .y Comm. Ketz, to approve s .1 s recommendation, Resolution P.C. 90- 56, with the following changes: Th. ondition 11(c) be deleted; and a con. . on shall be added specifying that all existing trees in the rear yard shbe shown on the landscape plan, and that an ee removal, or replacements for those removed from that ar- . , shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning ector. AYES: NOES: ABST ABS Comms. Ketz, Moore, Peirce, Chmn. Ingell None None Comm. Rue • 1- �►1 l►: ' .1/ :14 \114 ► 0 1 14tt t! � : : ► 1 14 \ I i • .-• 1 ' HIGHWAY. SOUTH BAY CYCLFS Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated July 11, 1990. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve a conditional use permit amendment, subject to the conditions specified in the proposed resolution. Mr. Schubach also suggested several alternatives: (1) to continue the request to require a subsequent environmental assessment of the potential noise impacts associated with the testing and test driving of motorcycles; or (2) to deny the request because of the unique and unusual noise characteristics of motorcycles and the proximity of residential uses. This project is located in SPA Area 7. The general plan designation is commercial corridor. The present use is vacant. The building size is 2400 square feet, and six parking spaces are provided. The environmental determination is categorically exempt, as a negative declaration was approved for the existing conditional use permit. On January 16, 1990, the Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit and negative declaration for the remodel of the existing structure for an automobile agency with the operation to be conducted indoors. The original owner of the property has since sold the property and the rights to the CUP to another owner. The new owner of the property has completed the bulk of the proposed building plan that was approved as part of the CUP. The structure has been rehabilitated and reduced in size. A much improved facade has been constructed and a paved parking area has been provided in the rear to provide parking for a building which previously had none. The applicant is proposing a business which involves the sale of used late model customized Harley Davidson motorcycles and would include the sale of parts and accessories. The applicant is also requesting to conduct light repair. - 3 Z - P.C. Minutes 7/17/90 The zoning ordinance does not specifically identify motorcycle sales on the permitted use list, although motorcycle repair is identified, subject to a CUP. Automobile, boat and truck sales are identified and permitted with a CUP. In staffs judgment, motorcycle sales is sufficiently similar to auto, boat, or truck sales to enable the Planning Commission to interpret motorcycle sales as a permitted use, subject to a CUP. The sale and repair services would all be conducted indoors in the same areas previously approved for sale of automobiles. Given that the approved CUP was also for motor vehicles, staff determined that this request would be similar in impact and therefore processed it as an amendment to the existing CUP without any additional environmental assessment. After further examination of the request, staff believes that the motorcycle business actually may result in greater noise impacts than the approved automobile business because of the nature of the vehicles. It should be noted that noise limits for motor vehicles on the public right-of-way, as stated in the City's noise ordinance, are regulated by the California Vehicle Code. Therefore, only the noise generated from the subject property is subject to the decibel limits of the noise ordinance. Staff believes these impacts can be mitigated through the conditions of a CUP with the cooperation of the business owner. Such conditions would prohibit the testing or the revving up of engines on the premises. The Planning Commission, however, may determine that the difference between motorcycles and automobiles is significant enough to warrant further environmental assessment and perhaps a noise study prior to making a final decision. Otherwise, the business is properly located in the highest intensity commercial area in the City and is surrounded by similar automotive -related uses. The building has been improved, and adequate landscaping has been provided in the rear. If there is to be a motorcycle business in the City, this is the appropriate location. The proposed building and the site are clearly adequate in size to support this business, with adequate indoor area to conduct minor repair work. Staff included several conditions in the proposed recommended resolution to address potential problems associated with this business. These include a limitation on the light repair to only consist of the removal and installation of motorcycle accessories and parts not related to the moving parts of the vehicle such as the engine and wheels and lubrication, and that such work may only be conducted inside with the doors closed. Also, standard conditions normally associated with auto agencies have been included to prohibit engine revving on the premises. Additionally, the rear parking area shall remain clear of all parts and merchandise, shall be for parking only, and loiteringshall be prohibited. Also, the requirement for a three-month review is included. Attached to the staff report was a letter from the adjacent property owner regarding a private easement for ingress and egress on the southerly ten feet of the subject property. This is essentially a private matter between adjacent property owners. However, in response to the concerns of Mr. McNeill, no part of the easement is proposed for parking, and conditions are included which prohibit the use of the parking area for merchandise display. Whether or not the rear end of this easement can be used for a trash enclosure is arguable and is a private matter. If it cannot be used for a dumpster, an alternative location on the site will have to be found to satisfy the City's requirement for an enclosed trash dumpster. Mr. Schubach noted that staff has expressed concern over the discovery of some barstools in the building. He stated that staff would not want to see any bar and barstools or tables and chairs inside this building. Staff has no objection to coffee being served to waiting customers; however, staff recommended a condition prohibiting any bar and barstools or tables and chairs for the purpose of serving customers. Public Hearing opened at 7:29 P.M. by Chmn. Ingell. William Campbell, 513 Dianthus, Manhattan Beach, owner and applicant, addressed the Commission and: (1) in response to a question from Comm. Moore related to his experience operating this type of business, stated that he has worked in a similar business in the past; (2) stated that he is fully confident of his ability to control the clientele in order to keep noise to a minimum; (3) noted that he will be at the business full time and will have full control over the establishment; (4) stated that he would like to remove the parking from the rear of the business and have the parking on Pacific Coast Highway; (5) noted that most of the noise is already on the highway, and that is the most logical location for parking; (6) stressed that he will have control over the customers and noise because he will be at the business. — 33 — P.C. Minutes 7/17/90 Nellie Schroll, 824 7th Street, addressed the Commission and objected to the project on the following grounds: (1) her home is directly behind the proposed business and there is excessive noise generated by this business; (2) motorcyclists congregate at this business and create problems; (3) riders race up 7th Street creating a dangerous condition; (4) damage was done to her property by the applicants when they were working on their business, and it has not been properly repaired. Mike Dauteuil, 831 6th Street, president of his condominium homeowners association, addressed the Commission and: (1) noted concern over excessive noise already at this project, including construction noise which has been going on late in the evening; (2) stated that the sound of the motorcycles is amplified and bounces off the walls, which makes it very noisy, even during the day; (3) noting that there is already noise, he expressed concern over the potential increase; (4) noted concern over test driving up and down the streets of the area; (5) noted that, even though the applicant has good intentions, stated that he is not now in control and the business is not yet even officially opened; (6) presented a petition with signatures of people in the neighborhood opposed to the granting of the CUP for this business; (7) stated that there is already too much traffic and noise on the highway; (8) noted concern over the City's ability to monitor the noise limits; (9) favored staffs suggestion that a noise study be done before any approval is considered; (10) questioned the enforcement ability of the City; (11) said that the residents will be adversely affected by this business; (12) noted concern over the types of people who will be drawn to the business and possible loitering. Ann O'Dell, 831 6th Street, Unit 5, addressed the Commission and: (1) agreed with the comments expressed by Mr. Dauteuil; (2) said that she has been awakened by construction and motorcycles late at night and early in the morning; (3) noted concern that 6th and 7th Streets will be used for test drives; (4) felt that a repair shop will only add to an already very noisy area; (5) objected to the barstools on the grounds that it will serve to create a breeding spot and create more noise; (6) objected to approval of a CUP and requested that the shop not be allowed to open. Jeannine Bringman, 831 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) appreciated the work that has gone into the conditions; however, she noted concern that the owner will not be able to enforce the conditions; (2) stated that Harleys are beautiful machines and people will want to test drive them after work has been done on them; (3) said that Harleys are the loudest bikes there are; (4) stressed that enforcement will cost the City money to police every single condition in the CUP; (5) asked the Commission to consider living directly behind this shop and having to listen to the noise generated by the motorcycles. Kenny Bornstein, owner of Auto Works at 501 1/2 Pacific Coast Highway, addressed the Commission and: (1) welcomed this business in the area; (2) said that the noise limits set by the State of California are the same for all types of vehicles; (3) in response to comments from Comm. Peirce related to why motorcycles are significantly louder than cars, stated that he was unable to provide an explanation as to why motorcycles are louder; (4) stated that there is enforcement related to noise of motorcycles, especially related to mufflers; however, he was unable to explain precisely what the requirements are; (5) said that people appear to be more afraid of the types of people who might be attracted to the business rather than noise generated by the business; (6) stressed that businesses have been very slow, and it would be appropriate to give this owner and applicant a chance; (7) said that he has no objection to the chairs in the business, noting that other businesses have chairs and there are no problems. Suzy Compton, 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that there is excessive noise generated from this business; (2) related to the Commission her confrontation with someone at the business, and his extreme rudeness to her; (3) submitted for inclusion into the public record a written copy of the events surrounding the confrontation; (4) noted that several years ago the City Council adopted a policy to make Hermosa Beach a less dense, more family-oriented area; (5) did not see how in any way approval of this CUP would contribute to a more family-oriented atmosphere; (6) stated that this business will generate excess noise and traffic, and that combined with the obvious disregard shown by these applicants toward the neighbors will greatly diminish the quality of life for the residents. Sharmine Williams, partner in the business, addressed the Commission and: (1) apologized for the Tate -night noise, explaining that they are under a construction deadline; (2) stated that they were unaware of the neighbors' complaints related to the late-night noise, but she noted it will not continue; (3) felt that it would be a good solution to park the motorcycles on P.C.H. rather than in the rear of the property in an effort to reduce the noise; (4) said they would be willing to cooperate with the neighbors; (5) said that they could post signs showing the approved test-drive routes; (6) discussed the stools in the shop, stating that many times people have to wait a long time and do not have other P.C. Minutes 7/17/90 transportation; therefore, it is nice to have a place for them to sit and wait; (7) discussed noise created by the mufflers and stated that in order to have a bike registered, it must comply with registration requirements; (8) stated that she was unaware of the confrontation described by Mrs. Compton; (9) in response to a question from Comm. Peirce related to why the majority of people feel that motorcycles arc much louder than cars, stated that there are certain legal noise regulations, and people can be cited for noncompliance; (10) said that they have no intention of making motorcycles louder than they can be as mandated by the law; (11) said that she does not have the expertise to answer questions related to noise requirements and regulations. Maiko Saravia, mechanic, addressed the Commission and: (1) responded to questions from Comm. Peirce related to DMV requirements for noise compliance regulations, stating that a noise detector is used to check the noise; (2) explained how muffler pipes are checked for noise emission; (3) said that the DMV checks bikes for registration, but he was unsure whether any noise measurement devices are used; (4) clarified that if someone is cited for a noise violation, they must go to the DMV for inspection; (5) said that someone will definitely get a ticket for having straight pipes (which creates excessive noise); (6) said that the Highway Patrol checks bikes for noise infractions. Ms. Williams again addressed the Commission and: (1) responded to questions from Comm. Moore related to noise and what could be done to ensure that noise would be reduced; (2) said that bikes can come in from the front as well as the rear, (3) said that bikes could be walked down the driveway to the rear parking area. Mr. Campbell again addressed the Commission and: (1) explained that he is also a contractor and he built the driveway; (2) noted that there is a slope into the driveway, and customers can start from the back and walk to the front of the business; (3) stressed, however, that he can handle the noise problems and he suggested that there be a three-month review to ensure that there is compliance; (4) was informed by Comm. Moore, however, that the Commissions' concerns lie with the fact that this CUP could be sold to another owner who may not have control; (5) stated that people are complaining about noise which is not generated from this business, explaining that noise comes from the car wash and from other people along thehighway. Mr. Campbell continued and: (1) stated that Hermosa Beach police are delighted about this business since they now drive Harleys; (2) said that these bikes are expensive and undesirables will not be attracted to the business. Mr. Saravia addressed the Commission and: (1) responded to Comm. Moore's questions related to the points raised by Mrs. Compton and the confrontation; (2) stated that he only told her he was trying to open a business and earn a legal living; (3) in response to a question from Comm. Peirce, stated that his motorcycle is legal; however, Comm. Peirce countered that his so-called legal bike prompted a neighbor to walk down the street to complain, and he asked for an explanation. Mr. Campbell stated it is not fair to accuse Mr. Saravia of not having a legal bike, noting that there is no way to judge that issue. Comm. Peirce noted concern that a neighbor had to walk down the street to voice a complaint against the noise. Mr. Campbell stated that people are just against Harley Davidsons in general. He continued by stating that he got a petition signed by all the business owners along the highway from Aviation to 190th Street, and they are all in favor of this business. He noted that the only objections are from the neighbors to the rear of the business. He stated that he purchased this property as C-3, and he thought this was a commercial zone. He stated that he decided not to sell autos since auto sales are down; therefore, he now wants to sell motorcycles. He continued by stating that the noise is already present; it is not being created by this business. Mr. Campbell stated that he is willing to stand behind his investment, and he can control the noise. He said that the City can review the CUP in three months to ensure his compliance. Mr. Campbell stated that he planted trees in the rear in an effort to mitigate the noise to the rear. He felt that the City is trying to push him out of the city. Mary Herbert, 825 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) did not want to give anyone a hard time with his business; however, she lives in this area and the noise is getting louder and louder; (2) noted concern that there will be additional motorcycles and attendant noise; (3) stated that the noise is disrupting her life; (4) said that people will test drive up 7th Street and go around the block and will present safety problems for the children and animals in the - 3s-- P.C. Minutes 7/17/90 area; (5) said that people on P.C.H. favor the project, but they do not live there; (6) stated that this business will decrease her property value. Richard Barks, 901 5th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) discussed noise requirements for Harleys and said that they are one of the noisiest bikes made; (2) said that people comply when new bikes are purchased, however, accessory pipes can be purchased and added on later which exceed the noise limits; (3) said that if someone is pulled over and cited, then they would have to go for an inspection; (4) strongly objected to any work being done on the bikes at the shop; (5) had no objection to sales of clothing and accessories, but he said that actual work on the bikes will create a tremendous amount of noise; (6) said that P.C.H. is already very noisy; (7) said that the engine design of Harleys is very noisy; (8) felt that they should not be allowed to do any work or customizing on site; (9) in response to a question from Comm. Peirce, stated that no special tests are required for motorcycles before they can be sold; (10) explained how various motorcycles are made and the modifications which can be done later. Jim Housley, 934 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that the CUP for the previously applied -for auto sales had many restrictions which he felt should still apply; (2) said that someone cannot come in through the front because they would be blocking the sidewalk, which is illegal; (3) noted that bikes in the rear will create noise; (4) commented from experience and stated that there are no special noise requirements for motorcycles; (5) objected to the additional traffic which will be created by this business; (6) hoped that restrictions could be implemented to mitigate the noise. Mr. Campbell stated that they will not be test driving up 7th Street, noting that no work will be performed. He said that the only thing to be done is installation of chrome parts. He also noted that people will not cruise 7th Street; they want to show off and drive on the highway. Mr. Campbell, in response to questions from Comm. Peirce, stated that they will sell clothing, mufflers, and everything which is chrome. All chrome products will also be installed. He stated that he will not install mufflers which are too loud because they would then be shut down. Earl Herbert, 825 7th Street, addressed the Commission and asked how the customers will be controlled when the owners' bikes themselves are too noisy. Bob Bringman, 831 6th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that people will need to accelerate in order to leave the shop due to the traffic pattern along the highway; (2) said that he does not want to hear all of the motorcycle traffic in his neighborhood; (3) opposed the additional traffic which will be generated by this business. Jackie Tegiaferro, 934 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) agreed with the comments made by the other neighbors; (2) said that other businesses on P.C.H. who favor this business do not have to live there. Mr. Bornstein addressed the Commission and stated that the vehicle code prohibits any alterations to the emission system, and any vehicles sold must meet requirements. Gerry Compton, 832 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that the owner of this business is suffering under the duress of the what the neighbors have been subjected to for the past several years in regard to other motorcycles and noise; (2) said that 7th Street is one of the few streets which goes all the way through with no cross streets; (3) felt that running bikes up 7th Street can be controlled; (4) was happy to see this business building at that location, noting that the applicant has spent a fortune in improvements; (5) noted that he would favor just about any business, except a motorcycle shop, based on the noise factor; (6) was surprised that there is no requirement for a sound wall; (7) said he is not willing to accept a situation which will be worse, and if it does become worse, he will move; (8) said that it will be difficult for him to rent out his apartments if the noise gets worse; (9) noted surprise that the staff has said the Commission must interpret whether or not this use is allowed; (10) said that there is no question about it; this business is not allowed per the code. Mr. Compton continued and: (1) was surprised there was no text amendment allowing for this use; (2) strongly urged that a posted test-drive route map, to be approved by the Planning Director, be posted at the business; (3) urged that no tuning up of motorcycles be allowed; (4) said that no information was presented as to how much additional traffic would be generated by this business; (5) asked that no use of residential streets be allowed for test driving; (6) said that the idea of walking bikes to the rear would be appropriate; (7) felt that rear access should not be allowed, but rather a gate could be installed to provide for side entrance; (8) said that there are ways to make the CUP strict, -3b- P.C. Minutes 7/17/90 however, he did not feel that there is any way to mitigate the noise at his property specifically; (9) said that there is no way to cite noise violators, since people will turn off the bikes if they see the police approaching with their noise meters; (10) suggested that there be no running of the vehicles outside the building and that if there is excessive noise, they should be required to install sound walls or other specific mitigation measures. Public Hearing closed at 8:37 P.M. by Chmn. Ingell. Comm. Peirce referred to the code, Page 501, where is states that a permitted use is a motorcycle repair business, with a conditional use permit required, subject to Article 10. He noted, however, that the code makes no mention of motorcycle "sales." He stated that Page 499 of the code permits automobile sales; however, no reference is made to motorcycle sales. He therefore felt that motorcycle sales are not allowed in the City since that use is not specifically mentioned in the permitted use list. Mr. Lee stated that his office addressed this issue, explaining that most codes are not exhaustive as to the types of uses allowed. When his office was consulted, the planning staff was informed that the it is within the purview of the Planning Commission to make an interpretation related to whether or not motorcycle sales is a use which is similar to other uses already permitted in the zone. He continued by citing specific sections of the code related to this issue. Mr. Lee clarified that, if the Commission deems motorcycle sales to be compatible with other similar uses in the same zone, the interpretation would be adopted by resolution and then forwarded to the City Council for ratification. Comm. Peirce, noting the numerous complaints presented by the neighbors related to noise, stated that this use should not be permitted unless adequate controls can be enforced. Comm. Peirce noted concern that this business could.end up becoming a gathering spot for motorcyclists and attendant noise problems which cannot be controlled. He stated that unless adequate controls can be implemented, this use would be a detriment to the homeowners living behind the shop. Comm. Ketz agreed with Comm. Peirce, stating that unless the noise can be mitigated, this would not be an appropriate use. She noted that noise concerns have been raised again and again in the City. She recalled that just within the past year, establishments on P.C.H. have been required to install air conditioning and close their windows. Also, she noted that the proposed car wash was required to mitigate noise. She therefore questioned whether the noise factor from the motorcycles can actually be mitigated enough so as not to present a nuisance to the neighbors. Comm. Moore stated that it is not the purpose of the Planning Commission to design the layout of a business; however, he felt that the noise problem would be mitigated if the running of engines is prohibited at some point on the driveway toward the rear of the property. He also suggested that the business be required to post such a rule and that the owner must be responsible for enforcement of the "no running engines" rule down the driveway. If such conditions were imposed, he stated that he could support approval of the request. He noted that many conditions have been included. No doubt the business will create an impact; however, he felt that this is a reasonable business for the City to maintain. He also noted that this is the correct zone for such a business. Comm. Moore continued by expressing concern over the enforcement of the rule against running engines down the driveway. He said that the major issue on this point is that of customer parking. He mentioned the idea of the parking of multiple motorcycles on P.C.H, noting that other such businesses use angled parking in front of their businesses. He asked whether such a parking configuration is possible in the City, and if not, whether the code could be amended to allow more than one motorcycle per striped parking space. Mr. Schubach explained that the Public Works Department oversees that issue, stating that he understands the code permits only one motorcycle per stall. He stated that this restriction was implemented several years ago. Comm. Moore stated that he would like further information on whether such a parking configuration could be used before a final decision is made, explaining that the parking is a central issue in this request. Mr. Schubach stated that the code does specify motorcycle spaces; however, he noted that he could investigate the issue further and return with a definite answer. P.C. Minutes 7/17/90 MOTION by Comm. Moore to approve the request, Resolution 90-57, with the addition of a condition requiring that motorcycle engines be shut off at the halfway point of the driveway from the front corner of the building to where it opens out into the rear parking lot; and that such requirement be clearly posted on the property and be strictly enforced. He further suggested that a notice be sent to the proper City agency to investigate the configuration of parking along P.C.H. to allow the parking of more than one motorcycle per space. MOTION DIES FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Comm. Peirce, noting that he did not second the motion, stated that he did feel such a motion would be a step in the right direction if there is strong enforcement by the personnel of this business. He noted concern, however, that this business could be sold in the future and the enforcement would not be as strict. He said that motorcycles by their design seem to be noisier than cars. He did not feel it would appropriate to have City personnel spend a great deal of time enforcing the noise and parking at this business, because he felt that there are other, more important matters for them to be investigating. He noted that he did not want to encourage a potential problem, stating that the running of motorcycles behind the business is not appropriate. Chmn. Ingell felt that angled parking is crucial for Comm. Moore's motion to work. He felt that staffs suggestion for a noise assessment would be appropriate. He noted that the owner has demonstrated that he is attempting to make this business work. He said that he would like to see such a business be a success, and he noted that Harley Davidsons now have a much better image than in the past. He further felt that it is necessary to address whether angled parking on the highway is a viable solution at this location before a final decision is made. Comm. Moore asked what type of noise assessment Chmn. Ingell is proposing, stating that such a study would seem merely to be a method to delay the project. Comm. Peirce recalled that the applicants for the proposed Mobil car wash were requested by the Commission to return with information proving that the use could meet the noise requirements. He felt that such a requirement would be appropriate in this case also. Comm. Moore pointed out that the applicant in this case has said he would be willing to operate the business with no running of engines in the rear parking lot. Comm. Peirce stated that he would be satisfied with a survey with proof that there would be no violation of the noise ordinance when there is motorcycle acceleration away from the curb in front of the business at the rear property line. Chmn. Ingell referred to the Mobil study also, stating that they did surveys at other similar businesses. He noted that he is not trying to delay the project; however, he wanted additional information before a decision is made. Comm. Moore stated that there appears to be no noise enforcement of motorcyclists when they are on the highway. He felt that the only viable solution in this case, therefore, is to control the noise at the rear of this business. He felt that such a condition would be easier to enforce and would be clear when the condition is being violated. He suggested that monetary penalties be imposed if violations occur. He felt that imposition of such penalties would be sufficient to motivate the owner to comply with the condition. Comm. Peirce disagreed, stating that the the greater aggregation of motorcycles is something which cannot be mitigated; and if that greater aggregation of motorcycles has any chance of violation of the noise code, then the use is clearly incompatible in the zone. He therefore stressed the importance of obtaining additional information related to whether or not they can meet the noise ordinance. Until such proof is submitted, he could not support approval. Comm. Moore asked whether a comparative study of the experience of the motorcycle shop on Artesia Boulevard would be satisfactory to ease the Commissions' concerns. Comm. Peirce stated that he would leave the decision of which location to study up to the applicant, noting that it is the responsibility of the applicants to prove to the Commission that they can meet the noise ordinance requirements. P.C. Minutes 7/17/90 MOTION by Chmn. Ingell, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to approve staff's alternative recommendation to continue the request to require a subsequent environmental assessment of the potential noise impacts associated with the testing and test driving of motorcycles; further, to request that additional information be provided related to the issue of angled parking along the highway in front of the business. Comm. Moore stated that he would vote against the motion because he was convinced that the relevant noise study has to do with the running of engines on the property; furthermore, he could not see how a practical noise study could be done as to what his customers using parking spaces along Pacific Coast Highway might do. AYES: Comm. Peirce, Chmn. Ingell NOES: Comms. Ketz, Moore ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Rue (TIE VOTE; MOTION FAILS.) MOTION by Comm. Ketz, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to deny the request. AYES: Comms. Ketz, Peirce NOES: Comm. Moore, Chmn. Ingell ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Rue (TIE VOTE; MOTION FAILS.) Mr. Lee pointed out that the hearing could be continued to a future meeting when all five Commissioners are present to vote on the matter. MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to continue this matter to the Planning Commission meeting of August 21, 1990, for the purpose of obtaining additional information. Mr. Schubach stated that further information could be presented related to the DMV, CHP, and decibel readings for motorcycles. AYES: Comms. Ketz, Moore, Peirce, Chmn. Ingell NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Rue Recess taken -from 9:05 P.M. until 9:15 P.M PARK 90-4 -- PARKING -PLAN AMENDMENT FOR SHARED PARKING TO ALLOW AN AEROBIC STUDIO AT 1310'1-A314 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY- -•- Mr. IGHWAYMr. Schubach gave staff report dated July 12, 1 90. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission continue this item to the meeting of August 7, 1990. This project is located in the C-3 zone, with a general plan designatI-of general commercial. The present use is as an office upstairs of 3500 square feet, with the remaining 6000 square feet vacant. The lot size is 13,565 square -feet. There are 24 parking spaces provided. The total bui dingPoor area is 9310 square feet, and the floor area of the studio is 1600 square feet. The environmental determination is categorically exempt. On October 17, 1989, the Planning Commission approved a parking plan request for this property for a martial arts studio in the 2900 square -foot leased space located closest to Pacific Coast Highway. The approval was based on the - 39- P.C. Minutes 7/17/90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 90-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN AUTOMOBILE AGENCY (AUTO BROKERAGE) AND AN EXCEPTION FROM THE MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT IN COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR AT 638-640 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, DESCRIBED AS LOT 18 AND PORTION OF LOT 19, WILSON AND LIND'S TRACT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 16, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for a Conditional Use Permit and exception from the moratorium on the issuance of building permit in the Commercial Corridor at 638-640 Pacific Coast Highway and made the following Findings: A. The applicant is proposing an interior and exterior remodeling to an existing one-story commercial building which reduces the total square footage of the building; B. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area and consistent with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, C-1 development standards pertaining height and setback, as required by the moratorium Ordinance 89-1004,Section 1(d); C. The proposed remodeling is consistent with the policies regarding development in commercial corridor described in Resolution 89-5270, and is compatible with surrounding properties; D. Allowing this exception to the commercial corridor moratorium will not adversely affect the purpose of the study, and will be consistent with the anticipated standards to be applied in the Commercial Corridor Zone; E. The imposition of conditions will mitigate any significant impacts associated with tb'e proposed use; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow the issuance of building permits for remodeling of an existing commercial building at 638-640 Pacific Coast Highway, subject to the following conditions: 1. The location of structures and features on the property shall be in accordance with the conditions below; anymodification shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. 2. The applicant shall provide six (6) parking spaces as shown on the revised site plan for employee and customer use. a. All parking spaces shall be properly striped with appropriate signs posted indicating that the spaces are for employee and customer use only. b. No vehicles for sale shall be parked in the required parking spaces. c. All parking areas shall be maintained free of unregistered and derelict vehicles or parts at all times. 3. All the signs must comply with the City's Sign Ordinance. 4. The public right-of-way shall not be used for the parking or storing of vehicles that are intended for sale, detailing, or other purposes. 5. Test driving of vehicles on local residential streets shall be prohibited. 6. Landscaping shall be provided along the east property line to provide a buffer zone from the residential properties. a. Two copies of a landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department describing type, size, and quantity of the plant materials. b. An automatic landscape sprinkler system shall be provided and shall be shown on the plans. c.. Six (6) inch raised concrete curbing shall be provided along the perimeter of the landscaped area. 7. There shall be a sign posted in the sales office directing the customers to the route, approved by the Planning Director, which may be used for test driving. 8. All exterior lighting shall be oriented in a manner to avoid glare to neighboring residences. 9. Exterior phone bells, buzzers, public address systems, or similar devices shall be prohibited. 10. Repair, service, and maintenance of vehicles shall not be conducted on the premises. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a. All outdoor activities shall be prohibited. 11. Storage of trucks, tractors, trailers, and RVs in the parking area or other location on the premises shall be prohibited, Unloading of vehicles shall be prohibited on public streets. 12. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's Noise Ordinance, Article 19.5 of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, and shall not create a nuisance to the surrounding residential neighborhood and commercial establishments. Creating loud or obnoxious noise shall be prohibited. a. Testing of cars alarms shall be prohibited except within the building with all doors and windows closed. 13. The exterior of the premises including the parking areas 'shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. 14. Prior to the Conditional Use Permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 15. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 16. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 17. There shall be a review of this Conditional Use Permit in six (6) months. 18. All employees shall be given a copy of the. Conditional Use Permit 'and • shall acknowledge by signature that the Conditional Use Permit has been read and understood. VOTE: AYES: Comms. Ingell, Ketz, Moore, Peirce, Chairman Rue NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-7 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting January 16, 1990. ^) . � -- ,� j:4 4 e, Chairman q0 Date p/pers638 CE -2 PROJECT ADDRESS A.TY 0 F H E R M O S ,EACHH t0-69) -- %(4 0 7c c\ -h c; Co ci.S-k \4e4rY &o � z �►�aaiiti Project Name (If applicable) e• LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING APPLICANT INFORMATION: / f I Name (s) / \I\J \ 1 \k aim Mailing �(',l l '� c C� SQ ra�Phone ��y� � � Mailing Address N 0ka-4/ "A S, � i tUn `r\O B&L, Applicant's Relationship t4Prop, t t)W -t°-Y APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE .PROJECT REQUEST Conditional Use Permit -Commercial Conditional Use Permit -Condominium Number of Units Development Agreement Environmental Staff Review Final Subdivision (Parcel/Tract Map) General Plan Lot Line Adjustment Lot Split Parking Plan Precise Plan Specific Plan Specific Plan Amendment Tentative Subdivision (Parcel/Tract Map) Zone Change Zone Variance Total Fees F)R OFFICE USE ONLY - DATE OF SUBMITTAL: RECEIVED BY: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: NOCULA lrP (attach additional pages if necessary) c{; l f 01514 0 ,f UN . Iran o rc.16. }fn, %, - cccr o g 5 1 r$ 4- I C5 kt OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT* We/ dw;a -I jmleQ `m.1 `be g duly sworn, depose and say that we/I are/am the owner of the roperty involved in this application and tha.the fore- going sttements and answers herein contained and the infor ;.ri*n'herewith submitted are true and correct to the best Sus'ed and sw•rn before me this day of i✓c� , 199(2. OTARY PUBLIC in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California. * Signature required from current o Lou)y k ani belief. Owner's Signatur Address Telephone LI -1( 2L,) OFFICIAL SEAL LAURICE M. DUKE N•fary Pv k • CMMr,•ntll PRINCIPAL Oiftu 11I L A. COUNTY t My Comtrt► "1 Yu. 17, 1993 property owner, not ownel- in escrow. 2 n Iggo N 0 /0 go (./o Lk+ SEP 2 0 1990 /1 uo-vt„ 4 -cu J_0/16 1 r� 7ti 7\1c -z'"- �-- 7 e -;,-tea,^ t� 9/19/90 TO WHOM IT SHOULD CONCERN: IAM HIGHLY OPPOSED TO NOISE AND AIR POLUTION. I BELEIVE IN CORRECTING OUR HEALTH HAZARDS AND NOT ADDING TO THEM BY ALLOWING NEW BUSINESS OWNERS TO OPEN UP SHOP AND ADD ADDITIONAL LEVELS OF WHAT WE DON't NEED TO BE ADDED TO OUR PAST MISTAKES. I HAPPEN TO LIVE ON 8TH ST. A DIRECT ROUTE TO THE OCEAN AND IN THE PAST FEW WEEKS OF THIS NEW CYCLE SHOP,I ABOUT FLY OFF THE COUCH WITH WHAT I WILL CALL A PACK OF MOTOR CYCLES FLY UP AND DOWN A STREET THAT ALL READY SUFFERS FROM A HIGH RATE OF NOISE POLUTION AS IS. THANKYOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PLEASE KEEP YOUR COMMUNITY IN MIND.- IN THE DECISION YOU WILL BE MAKING. PATRICIA PREISS 719 8th. St Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254 10011 9/19/90 City of Hermosa Planning Department Council Members Iam against the motor cycle shop on Pacific Coast Highway. The noise and air polution that this community is subject to is at a level at this time that we can't afford additional. Iam not against new business owners. I believe new business should help our community not deteriorate what we are building for. Donald Kellogg 721 8Th St Hermosa Beach, Ca a.„. <ia � Lie+..-u��.., i,, 4-1, a,44,L. 4..",:, y /17-144ttYa-e‘- -ibi,_ , 2)4_ it -6,4_ 44_.__ -c7-,4 10.4Za,„ -1t-cAto, A-6,, ei.- e.,,Lzz LA- ztct 14_6z, /6-e.--,, w -c fi a-"-I-e ,z1L.4- � a -)1,-0)4a. A_-4cre ,c..� ` �-u -A4W.Le, GctO-uQ.j OL.-8 (0-L y-LxGtGGz2 � -L'-'c etLia_t46t, -C C.l P loon .. _ Jo 411L. eft 16/1"A'L _moo_ E' 2 1990 A20 • •'WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1990 * Mother's Search Ends With 3 Guilty Verdicts n Justice: She spent 10 years looking for the people who killed her son. A jury convicts them of murder. From United Press International SAN JOSE—A relentless, 10 - year search by a mother for the outlaw bikers who stomped her son to death and stole his motorcycle culminated Tuesday when a jury found three men guilty of murder. Michael Allen Hodges, 38; Rich- ard Morris Dollar, 34, and John Michael (Slug) Stelle, 49, were found guilty by a Superior Court jury of the first-degree murder of Gus Henry Hoffman of Los Gatos, who disappeared on July 4, 1978. The jury, which deliberated for nearly a week, also found that special circumstances necessary to impose the death penalty accom- panied the crime—that the murder was committed during the course of robbery, kidnaping and infliction of torture. But both the prosecution and defense agreed to waive the jury during the penalty phase of the trial, set for Thursday, and Judge Paul Teilh was expected to hand down sentences of life in prison for all three defendants, a court spokesman said. The arrests came nearly a dec- ade after Hoffman, 20, disappeared. Over the years, his mother had hired private investigators and personally haunted biker bars to chase down leads in the murder. Rose Hoffman, now 50, persisted in • her search to the point of hanging around in the neighbor- hood of one of the suspects and feeding police bits and pieces of information until Hodges was ar- rested in his Sunnyvale home in June, 1988. Dollar was charged in his cell at San Quentin Prison, where he was serving time for a parole violation. Stelle, carrying a loaded .38 -caliber pistol, was ar- rested by Contra Costa County sheriff's deputies in December, • 1988, at a friend's home in Oakley. if A fourth suspect, Michael Ste- venson, was killed in an unrelated shooting in San Joaquin County in 1986. Prosecutors said Gus •Hoffman disappeared while riding his mo- torcycle in San Jose. The ev-D..vid¢o •'• E CIZers popuCar among • aw bikers as - Tt as mains re to rr iSl racte tie attention of the Cly pecctt court testimony revealed. -Hoffman was "boxed in by two bikers and a carload of people who escorted him to Stevenson's house," one witness testified. At the house, Hoffman was forced off the motorcycle and murdered by the suspects, according to court testimony. Hoffman's body has never been found, and that bothers his mother. "They never found his body," she said after the arrests. "If some- one out there could help us find my son, I could put him to rest." GARY GENE FERGUSON Post Office Box 426 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Telephone: (213)379-6752 August 10, 1990 Planning Commission City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: South Bay Cycles at 640 Pacific Coast Highway. I am writing in support of South Bay Cycles. If there was ever a suitable location for such a shop it is on Pacific Coast Highway - a major highway and business thoroughfare for decades. The noise factor of individual motorcycles is already regulated and it is surely not reasonable to penalize any business applicant because there might be a violation of existing noise control regulations by a potential customer. I am certain the Commissioners, as well as the Councilmembers, are aware of the new positive image of the Harley rider as reported in the Los Angeles Times, California Magazine, Los Angeles Magazine and myriad other publications in recent months. A Harley can easily cost more than a new car and is certainly considered a prestigious vehicle. In addition the motorcycle is one of the most environmentally sound means of transportation, especially considering that most Southern Californians travel alone most of the time, and the average Harley will get in excess of 50• miles per gallon of gasoline and take very little space on the roadway. 1s my understanding that the sale of "automobiles and automobile.,parts" would be permitted. The word automobile comes from the greek and french with the literal meaning of self-propelled. The Oxford Dictionary does not specify four wheels and even Webster's only says that the automobile usually has four wheels. Perhaps motorcycle parts and sales is not specifically identified on the City's permitted use list because it falls within the definition of "automobile." Finally, I have been in many, many motorcylce shops and have never seen one that was crowded - I would even say rarely have I seen more than three customers at a time in any shop. Thank you for your attention and I beg your support of uth Bay Cycles. ncerely yours, Gy Gene Ferguson TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURES: 118 WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS IN THE SURROUNDING AREA ARE OPPOSED TO THE GRANTING OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PROPOSED MOTORCYCLE ACCESSORY SHOP BETWEEN 6TH & 7TH STREETS ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. OUR MAIN CONCERNS ARE: 1. THE ADDITIONAL NOISE ASSOCIATED. WITH A SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE IN MOTORCYCLE TRAFFIC. 2. THE CITY'S ABILITY OR INABILITY TO MONITOR OR ENFORCE ANY NOISE STANDARDS WHICH MAY BE IMPOSED ON THE BUSINESS. 3. THE LACK OF SAFEGUARDS IN THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE RIGHTS OF RESIDENTS WHO WILL BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS BUSINESS. WE HAVE ALL HEARD ENOUGH MOTORCYCLES SCREAM UP OUR STREETS TO EXPERIENCE TRUE TERROR AT THE PROSPECT OF THE GRANTING OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. NAME ADDRESS 5-Ayik J -Iwo h Oa( 15-0 We,zrne,s'i.g eros- '712- S& `/5-1/. T. ' — ,L- e4v. `1 it JOro TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURES: 45 r PETITION ( ues, T I/ c 30 We are in favor of the opening of South Bay Cycles, a motorcycle sales, parts and accessories store due to open at 640 Pacific Coast Highway on August 1, 1990. In signing this petition we eagerly await the new addition to Hermosa Beach. Company Name Company Address larking -Device c JAMA AUTO HOUSE, INC: 700 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 (213) 318-1639 (213) 3.18-1630 --VASEY'S PREMIUM CARS —4.402-Pacific-Caast-Hwy.. 'iiez-±nasa Bch., CA 90254 CUE HOUR PHOTO PLUS 820-Paciflt—Ceast Hwy. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 tek (213)-379-7928 --BEACH CITIES - --- — OFFiCE SUPPLY CO. _ 8L S B2$-PACIFICCOAST HWY. -- -- - -- --- - HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 --(213137412276 ---- — et!45 o 860 PACIFIC COAST HWY_--.— --- HERMOSA BH. CA. 90254 24 RICHARD OBRYAN 1000 Pacilic Coast Hwy. Hermosa Beach. CA 90254 { A& }ferhrasa Car was/. Exotic Care Specialists Complete Hand Wash Custom Detailing (213) 376-1477 -— 2ececve� /'th a WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS IN THE SURROUNDING AREA ARE OPPOSED TO THE GRANTING OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PROPOSED MOTORCYCLE ACCESSORY SHOP BETWEEN 6TH & 7TH STREETS ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. OUR MAIN CONCERNS ARE: 1. THE ADDITIONAL NOISE ASSOCIATED WITH A SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE IN MOTORCYCLE TRAFFIC. 2. THE CITY'S ABILITY OR INABILITY TO MONITOR OR ENFORCE ANY NOISE STANDARDS WHICH MAY BE IMPOSED ON THE BUSINESS. 3. THE LACK OF SAFEGUARDS IN THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE RIGHTS OF RESIDENTS WHO WILL BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS BUSINESS. WE HAVE ALL HEARD ENOUGH MOTORCYCLES SCREAM UP OUR STREETS TO EXPERIENCE TRUE TERROR AT THE PROSPECT OF THE GRANTING OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. NAME 44"./3 APQ'tre--/ __Gun chd ccr:,j,_ a , VCJ 7/1 CR -A -L -11A04],, ADDRESS If /o 7 - fQ _774Th v ri , r3 63/ e>>{ f, 11 6450 q\V- r id 2oFZ 907-5,4- ! r (r r( [ ( 'l Last Saturday afternoon I was sitting in my living room watching TV when a motorcycle began ,revving its engine. It was so loud I could not hear the TV or anything else. The sound continued. I expected it would end in a few seconds, as it always does when a motorcycle is passing by on PCH,but it continued, so loud that I couldn't even hear myself think! I walked out my front door and to the curb, and looked down 7th Street to PCH. I saw a biker stopped at the curb continuing to rev the motor. I walked down the hill toward him as he continued making an incredable amount of noise, smoke billowing from the bike the entire time. As I approached the bottom of the hill I saw several salesmen from the JAMA car lot, next to where the biker was stopped, walking toward the biker also. Clearly, they could not hear above this noise, either. I reached the corner of 7th and PCH and called to him from several feet away but he couldn't hear me. At this point he turned his bike around and headed down PCH and turned into the new motorcycle shop. This was when I realized that this was not just a biker passing by on PCH, but an employee or customer of the motorcycle shop. As it turned out, he is one of the owners of the shop. I walked down to the shop, very angry at the level and length of the noise I was subjected to. When the gentleman finally cut the bike off I was extremely angry and told him that the noise was very unbearable and that he shouldn't sit at the bottom of the hill and rev his motor. He told me he was just waiting .for traffic to clear to turn around and had to rev the engine the entire time because there was a problem with the motor, that he was working on it, and that it would "cut out" if he didn't rev it. t 1. Iggn Then he told me it was a public street, the pipes on the bike were legal, and there was nothing I could do about it. I told him I would come to this meeting and talk to the Planning Commission about it, and he said, "You make any trouble for me lady, and I'm gonna make trouble for you." We continued arguing and further into the conversation he said, "Would you rather I break into your house and steal all your stuff to make a living or open a business here?" If these are my choices, my answer is NONE OF THE ABOVE!" Several years ago the votors of Hermosa Beach passed an adviosry statement to the City Council calling for a "less dense, more family oriented community". The council and this commission have accomplished the "less dense" part of that statement by downzoning our neighborhood, and many others in the city. I fail to see how approving the operation of this business by these owners could in any way contribute to making our neighborhood more "family oriented". To the contrary, I feel the additional noise and traffic generated by this business, combined with their obvious disregard for the residents in the neighborhood, will greatly deminish the quality of our lives in general. Suzy Compton 7th Street Hermosa Beach ...icNEILL CONSTRUCTION & DEV(LLOP ,ENT WAYNE S. 1-3cUEILL 1444 AVIATION BLVD, SUITE 201 REDONDO BEACH CA 90278 (213) 374-6003 July 6, 1990 Michael Schubach Planning Director Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA 90254 RE: Conditional Use Permit 633-640 Pacific Coast Hwy South Bay Cycles q19q0 Please find enclosed, a copy of the Superior Court Lawsuit to quiet title on a disbuted easement right. The easement is specifically for the ingress and egress of pedestrians and vehicles. The parking of automobiles, motorcycles, trash containers, repair parts, and equipment is a violation of this easement right. Any display of "For Sale" automobiles, motorcycles and assessories on the easement area is also a violation of the right of way granted by the easement. The approved plans also indicate that a. trash can enclosure was to be built at the rear of the lot. This is located within the easement and is prohibited by the nature of the easement. Alternate plans indicated that three parking spaces were to be located by the existing retaining wall within the easement area. Again, the parking of automobiles or motorcycles is prohibited by an easement for ingress and egress. Conditions should be set forth by the Planning Department on the applicant that should specifically disallow these activities on the subject easement. Sincerely, °41'1&- VIINC WAYNE S. MCNEILL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I, the and rsigned, do ecla a under penalty of perjury that I did on the day of e/i�� , 197'0 , deposit into the United States Post Office, fst class postage prepaid, a copy of the public notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached on Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit "B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the public notice attached as Exhibit "A". I also posted the two (2) signs in two (2) clearly visible locations at the subject property. I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these public notices to be made in an accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the city harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices. In the event an action is instituted in a court of competent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the public notices,'then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of a hearing which was held in accordance with the public notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be defective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those public notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns, or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare, under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 77( h.ve executed this declaration on this the /p day of /r , , 19 j20 at Hermosa Beach, California. (Project Location) Application for (CUP, Tract Map, etc.) State of California County of Los Angeles ) SS: On t is the /V day of (Capacity) •%/7L-G`-�L-� 19 0:7, before me, /_ / - _ the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared Za-i /c , (i,-,.;;</9 ham' Z -Z--- and 04 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence or ( ) personally known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) /S subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that /iP executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (seal) OFFICIAL SEAL • LAURICE M. DUKE Notary Public - C*l fnrnla PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN L A. COUNTY 11r comm. Exp. Mer. 12, 1993 A COMPASS ENGINEERING CO., INC. September 19, 199Qpi1 Enriineciiuii and Planning Consultants The City Council City of Hermosa Beach Re: 640 Pacific Coast Hwy. Job No. 90-3114 You have before you a Conditional Use Permit from South Bay Cycles to determine under what conditions they will be able to operate a motorcycle repair shop at 640 Pacific Coast Highway in the city. The Planning Commission turned them down flat! The staff did not even set tentative conditions until we provided our own and insisted they be presented! The staff then critiqued them and provided more stringent ones. As you are aware, there has been opposition to the location of this motorcycle shop by the neighborhood residents led by a former member of the planning commission. Any opposition that prevents opening should be ignored! They have a right to open! Only criticism which suggests helpful restrictions that tend to mitigate problems should be listened to! We have a constitution which protects us from the tyranny of neighbors and neighborhoods. It is the responsibility of elected officials of the jurisdiction to enforce these rights! We all understand that this is an activity which people consider noisy and one where they consider the patrons and operators undesirable for their. neighborhood. This, however, is not the proper subject for a Conditional Use Permit. Far more pertinent and what should be the sole consideration is the legality of the business and it's place within the zones of the city. On that subject, consider the following: Zoning - The code specifically states that the repair of motorcycles is allowed (with a Conditional Use Permit) in this zone. This was placed in the code this year. Obviously to say that this is not the intent of the zone, when it clearly states it is, is hypocrisy. Compatibility with neighborhood - Many statements have been made regarding the compatibility of the shop with the neighborhood. The Planning Commission and City Council SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 200 Pier Avenue, Suite 40 • Hermosa Beach, California 90254 • Telephone: (213) 374-9781 concluded it was compatible and put it in the code in 1990. Residential adjacent to Commercial Zone - Pacific Coast Highway is what is known as a strip commercial zone. Common throughout this city and in Southern California. Each one of the residents has purchased their property near an extremely noisy street knowing full well that the price they paid reflected the relative value discounted for its location. Now they are asking their government to enhance their property value by disallowing a legitimate economic activity in the area! This of course is hypocritical and unfair. Pacific Coast Highway is obviously a place for this type of commercial activity and has been for years. Motorcycle sales, parts and repair have occurred on Pacific Coast Highway in the past. Indeed many of the same opponents were in opposition when the automobile sales Conditional Use Permit was issued for the property. This is not a motorcycle issue. The residents simply do not want anything there. Noise - Much testimony has been given by the opponents that this shop will increase the noise level of the neighborhood. To prevent that, the applicant has agreed to: • —1 m i -t operation s t o-9 : U U—am t.o 7 :_0 0—pm- a a:e d a�-�- ▪ Walk all cycles with engines off while outside the building. • All repair work which requires operating engines, will be done with repair shop doors closed and cycle inside. ▪ No road testing will be done at all. ▪ No modifications to mufflers will be made by the shop which might increase noise. • Shop will encourage good neighbor noise policies. • Use of baffles by all clientele will be encouraged. This is all any applicant can be expected to do. More About Noise - We have heard staff testimony that the Highway noise levels exceed the City standards. If that is so, then the noise problem is one that the applicants have no control over. Further, they should not be held responsible for it; nor should they suffer because of it! There has been no credible evidence that has shown that they will in any way affect the noise or congestion on the Highway. Indeed, statically their effect would be so small it would be insignifl.cant. Motorcycle Noise - Motorcycles make a distinctive noise that we all recognize! However, no evidence has been presented that they are louder than any other vehicle. Just distinctive! As are buses, trucks or Porsche's and Ferrari's for that matter. All legal under the State Laws. The opposition's complaints may be with the State ranili rcmr,ntc 11Q Noise Enforcement - Society must rely on enforcement for its laws. Not prior restraint of possible offenders. Please consider this statement and understand how true it is: If we allow no business on Pacific Coast Highway in that neighborhood. The highway would not be any less noisy! If so: ▪ Do not our own busineses have a right to a share of the noise? • Are we rethinking the code because some one actually believed they could operate a shop here. If people violiate the law off the applicants property, is he responsible for them? It maybe the people have no faith in enforcement. The applicant is not responsible for that. Traffic - There is no reason to believe nor has any evidence been produced that this particular operation will create any more traffic (1) than was anticipated in the commercial zone, (2) than occurred from the businesses that were previously in the building and, (3) that this use is more intensive than any other type of business in the area. Indeed, repairs and accessories will produce a relatively low amount of traffic, probably far less than the previous retail operations. Regardless, the only way to determine what the impact will be is to allow them to proceed and measure their traffic. Conditional Use Permits - Conditional Use Permits were designed in the 1950's by the City of Los Angeles in order to handle special circumstances of businesses moving into neighborhoods. The purpose of it was not to deny a permit but rather to get neighborhood impact as to how the business could become a good neighbor. It was never intended nor should it be used as prior restraint to not allow any legal business from operating. Unfortunately, it has become that especially in the City of Hermosa Beach. We all know that prior restraint is unconstitutional and aggressively protected by the courts. We all remember the Pentagon Papers and the spy lists that had to be published before a wrong could be demonstrated and prosecuted. Like or not, government officials and the neighborhood do not have the right to say that someone else is undesirable for their neighborhood. Although we might like to apply this to motorcycle shops, it gets applied to them and other undesirables, undesirable because of race, creed, color. That is exactly why it is illegal. Any failure not to issue a Conditional Use Permit with reasonable conditions is a discriminatory act and should not be tolerated in this community! City Power - The Council has the power to refuse to allow them to operate. That will probably break them, enrich the person or bank who forecloses, temporarily quiet the residents and maybe enhance your image in some eyes. But is it fair? The constitution should not be suspended in Hermosa Beach. These kids are fighting for a chance to get a little piece of the economic pie. They do not even know or understand why people do not want them in the neighborhood. They did not know Hermosa Beach's attitude towards business. They were naive and invested their life savings. To deny them will cause them to lose those savings. You, on the other hand, have a public choice to make. Regardless of which way you go, many will hold it against you. The neighborhood is fickle. They will turn on you in the future if you cross them on the next issue. So...if you are to be unliked or to disappoint some one...should you not uphold the principles the United States of America was founded on? Giving a chance to new people? Allowing their rights to be enforced without Lawyers and Judges? Doing what is right. The United States is a Nation of laws, not of men; Where the wishes of majority are followed but the rights of the minority are upheld. Short Memories - The neighborhoods have short memories. We remember projects that would "destroy the City", that we can hardly find (Hermosa Pavilion; Vons Center; Park Pacific Plaza; The boat yard; etc.) Crisises all. Now forgotten. Let the shop operate and see if there are complaints. If so, deal with them then when you have evidence. They have operated as a motorcycle clothing store for three months, and there have been no complaints yet. Law Suits - If you deny them and they have any money left, they will sue. You will defend and spend $20,000 to $50,000 on defense; for what...a chance to lose? The courts will probably say work it out. So why not let them operate? If they go broke, their gone. If there are no complaints, no problem. If there are complaints, you have good evidence to use it in court! City Attorney - Ask him straight. Is a law suit worth it? How much would it cost? Ask about prior restraint (if the requested activity is allowed under your code). Ask about the public statements that have been made by city representatives. Ask about the Palm Readers. You and Your Vote - This is your chance to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. This is an important vote. Its People against business Its Voters against non -voters Its Establishment against undesireables Carefully explain that you understand the neighborhood's concerns. Promise to watch carefully; encourage them to complain (honestly); ask them to understand that the boys have some rights too. Explain that everybody desires a chance. Vote to let them open. Give them a chance to be a good neighbor. Outsider Mentality - Many negative comments have been made that these people are carpet baggers. One of them lives in Venice, one of them lives in Manhattan Beach. They own the property located at 640 Pacific Coast Highway. The concept of residents having a more vested interest than outsiders is abhorrent to the constitution and the entire concept of America. It has no place in our discussions or our thoughts. Irreconcilable Problems - The applicants cannot solve the problems of Pacific Coast Highway or peoples anger over what is allowed by the State Department of Motor Vehicles! They should seek redress with those governmental agencies. Nor should we be penalized for those frustrations. If the vehicle is legal when it entered our property, it will be legal when it leaves. Real but ugly - One Planning Commissioner said "We do not want that kind of business in our city!" Jerry Compton said "the applicants $250,000 to $500,000 investment doesn't count against the neighborhoods' $400,000,000 investment." Do we really think this is about noise, congestion and business? It's about 40 years of B movies about Bikers, undesireables, bad elements, outsiders, long hairs and minorities! Let's enforce the constitution, ask the residents to be patient and try to help. Give these people some conditions that help the neighborhood and let them operate for 6 months. Review them and shut them down if they are bad neighbors. The only way they can show they can be good neighbors is to let them be one. r 09'.4 1910 :i' 3i.. FROM LE:341-U!;'EEPC»':RA �onumrna TO Charles Vose, Esq., City Attorney, Hermosa Beach. FROM : Ralph Goodson, Esq., Attorney For South Bay Cycles. (213) 828-7631 TO 46:`•13:b RE Pending Hearing On Applications For Sale Of Motorcycles, Motorcycle Parts And Repair From City Of Hermosa Beach Date : September 24, 1990 ¢"3#47 7 6404%/(0 -4 -(A) - The City Planning Commission, and, on appeal, the City Council have been asked to approve zoning and conditional use pe:cmits (perhaps improperly imposed) . This appears to he an improper Abridgement of tI'e applicants First and other Amendment Rights. I. The Equal Protection Clause requires more of governmental regulations than nondiscriminatory application. McLaughlin v jrida& 379 US 184, 189-190, 13 L.$d 2d 222, 226, 227, 85 S. Ct. 283 it imposes a requirement of some rationality in the nature of the class it singles out. The ConStitutian does not require things which are different in fact to bP treated in law as if they are the same. a k, 310 US 141, 147, 84 L.Ed 1124, 1128, 60 S. Ct. 819 Hence, legislation may impose special 1 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION c, .: 24 : T.90 14: Vr FROM LEG4LIF.E Ea,'HILQA TO •e_s •o F burdr.ns upon defined classes in order to achieve permissible ends. BUT the equal protection clause doe require that in defining a class si.hject to regulation, the distinctions that ace drawn have some relevance to the purpose "for which it was made" Bixstron_v gi r t1d4 383 U9 107, 111, 15 ',Aid 2d 620, 624, 86 8. Ct. 760 in this context we fail to find a relevant distinction between automobile sales and motorcycle sales; 2. The question that we have is "what was the particular regulation in question" designed to achieve? It appears, the requirement for the CUP was put in place due to public pressure to keep "biker" types out of town under the "noise" theory. If this is what it was designed to achieve, then the law violates the equal protection clause, because of the "stereo -type" factor. Governmental actions cannot be taken under the theory that a g,:rup of individuals feel that bikers are offensive and may create noise in the community. Under such a doctrine, unpopular political, racial, and religious groups might find themselves virtually inarticulate. Dirmiaiell4 v.Chioago, 337 US 1, 69 S.Ct. 894, 93 L.Sd 1131 (1949) see also SO lel v ;bhal2p, 163 72d 877 (8th Cir.) 2 0.-24';950 tEI4O FPOOM LEGALI,E E : ILP' TO 4�:15S:.E P.03 3. It is settled as a matter of law that any and all governmental action must be "rationally related to legitimate yoveznmental objectives" Mathews v Lues = 427 O9 495, 510,, 49 L. Ed 2d 651, 96 5. Ct. 2755 As long as any action rationally advances a reasonable and identifiable governmental objective, the regulation will be treated as being valid. In the instant case, the city wi;l have to demonstrate that there is no immutable human attributes involved in the denial of permits. Namely, it will have to show that they have a legitimate interest in denying the permit; 4. What is "Legitimate interest" varies from case tO case. The following do not constitute legitimate interest, to wit: community pressure, noise, potential for committing crimes, etc. In Brown v Board Of Zdgcatim, 349 OS 294, 7S S.Ct. 753, 99 L.Bd. 1083 the court denied the request to stay the order, under the "public hostility" theory stating that pibttc_ hostility is not sufficient. Noise could be a basis to deny the permit, but the ca t y will have to make a record, which must show that the noise fr0M bikers, exceed that from traffic, etc in the vicinity. Noise on Pacific Coast Highway is regulated by the State Of California. As the state regulates the noise, Courts will look at the state 3 t F-• -+ r 1 iJ r 1 r .J L, i L_ 1 'v' E. K 1 i t t r.: • ,: o. r' . ";Z4'.1i10 :€:40 F �Ii LeiILu E=Ei.ChaLka TO 43;,;3:4 3?♦ P. 4 standards in comparison to what the city is asking in order to deter nine, whether or not city standards are reasonable. 5. In order for the zoning ordinance to pass consLit.utional muster, the city must have in place guidelines whch the commission has to follow in evaluating, the application. Lack of guidelines, violates due process and renders the regulation unconstitutional; 6. Even if all Else is fails, a valid argument can be made that the ordinance as applied or enforced in the instant case has been in an unconstitutional manner. It is stare decisis that enforcement of an otherwise valid ordinance violates the constitution if the decision of the particular zoning body is arbitrary South Gy►_in.At,._Ye t_y e v Pruitt 491 F 2d 5, 7 or if it is enforced with a discriminatory intent or purpose Tark yeki_v Robekt_fartlett Realty C9. 644 P2d 1204. A particular decision is arbitrary if it is reached without adequate determining principle or was unreasoned. United ftates v Carmlg15, 329 US 230, 243, 67 9. Ct. 252, 258, 91 L.Bd 209 7. To take this to court, one does not have to exhaust all administrative remedies Patsy v Board Of Roagnte Of The State 4 S. E F' - 2 4 - 9 a MUN 1 7 : 00 uL I VER T OEl VEF: t it 1 F' F. a6 e? :r ;"0 1•.:♦1 FOM LE.JQAPESEaULCI : 46;:1336 F. C . Qt—f 1940 457 US 496, 102 S. Ct . 2557, 73 L.Ed 2d 172. The city cannot support its theory. Applicants will be able to prove intentional or purposeful discrimination in accordance with the gapy4e _x,HugAct , 321 C8 1, 8, 64 S. Ct. 397, 401, 88 LAM 497 8. The wrong doing municipal employee is vulnerable to punitive damages City Of Newport v Fact C2apeztg, Inc., 101 S. Ct. 2761 in Ion.hell Qgpt. Of190-al Services. 436 US 658 the Court stated that municipalities can be held liable under 42 USC 1983. ,The amount of damages recoverable are punitive damages and compensatory damages. Sethy v Alameda County Water Platfictj. 545 12d 1157 (9th Cir. ) (en bane) In the instant case the economic loss to the appltcants could very well be valved in seven fig.res; 9. We hope that the city council will consider the tax burden any judgement would impose on the people of Hermosa Beach before making any decision. 5 y..t.:'r.rj ( ,t?--' ,'!�/rf,t. ' . . R TENANT IMPROVEMENT TO EXIST. COMMERCIAL: BUILDING L_T es ac 6'-9" F.A 1tlf+/P HTA[FMQ PlLdT'�b T A6 �6 _ ® u49Y•S Q �7 �B�IgP. 00 1.111. Obn®—.. P Ro dwl.w d�p .T$SlrOa•K' DO Oa10T a/Ib4P$.1N` it MYv®v rTTt s` 1• { \ r`,11? I I ! % =1i lr,1•1y i 1 4. I�_19a F v '•_OirviT —..0731372 SEN1r . M R. CAMPBELL /OWNER (213)328-0603 PROJECT ADDRESS 638- 640 PACIFIC COAST HWY., HERMOSA BEACH. CA. PROJECT DATA 124' x. L OT ARCA : CoOO4 41 24sN2 :..o. ;:PReseNr) OccUr'AIJcy GLA,3IPIGATION : 9¢�G�N®R.e�. r„A41 cG UPA 4 1' d¢ DL'.. : ►IGTUR4 pir,ses.zgTAIL p Uhlu&fs. coy,TILUCTIory TYP. eYI T. ®LO'4.ARlA ®1D16.AR.A/. Tq /I Ii MA 14� QRI!% LOT COV i/eadC A -Z A-1, SHEET INDEX , IT OF' rL M: a+r1lT. 4 DMR Lo..OUMv W F L.PL.*. FA134 ...IA : Pno.+KT PsTA. t aT IHPFX w1.41gDw 1L UKtiI . fauf, WefT MLA VATION CGTIoN A -A I TYPE Y I -He (u%a 9wH41 t, 145.O 3, 4 g0.00 q % F Q%t :•EO LOT CIMA-Ais✓QS 41> t. Ex I,T. P/. -4(1N. : Now4 PROP19v1C4 r64C.ICII46 I 4 H.c. .TA_i-, 14'-dx:0'p. T1,. 7TALL', D-0" 1 1,'_d 4091 °TALL,I-b{, 13 A Kc HITec. : AR.041TrLTURAL 441.LLR`( 19.112 I4AWTINKN6 6s -VD 4UITL L AWM OAl3, 4.010~ (1101J4-9013. Pj:oJBGr PS 6se TONY RLRMALIO•L rF4G i ag: AA RT A*.IMK i Mlwc. 1611 [L r AOo T/CCANGa, LA . /1/ 371 t111) il•-MAL r co,J I:IGT VIstArrissi : YIc?oR • yule AL .Z HNitmy cALca: troLI1/41ty7 n.s024 YBNTUr..A pLIvV. *WITS g 1 WfBt'LANO MILLA.4A. 4I 44 (010)941-6010 II '+OoI2J4 , W,>LL • ®C 67.43 PLN6 aP 9T c....1- 4 33,444 OTt44.1. 1... ••t, OU I 7� e__� IP& rta nsr4a1' ' iP sr..a-duY1©NT TO got, Tr pup sr,. Cat*, CON4 os—A6 \[1 cm IOC -G" ; Nbler CoCae cO CKGIAL pLO'O o4 4- II, - II, v' � HOW KaTAM Nb saw-. _xl�'T_BuI LT -UP_? Oma. ' E.119r i sroKT fn MHev�wL B�/id 111q.11/ .�1 11'11, 4 P.I. pL6V: IM.' ) r r, y ,_1 4 08 Liss.° RETAIL OTOR6 Ol.soI UV[y•ls '.A, N11TIR 1 , I L• i• '1st.c..c. R6Ts¢s 401- o" EXIST 6 DEMO. GROUND FLOOR PLAN WALL T(PP : e•lI T. WALL. TO XeM0.0.4 .1 pXI6T: WALL TD ®6 Rops‘iao :..i x7"' -1'-o• E XI ST. SITE PLAN SHEET NO. L_ OF SHEETS y ... •: .. I.. .... yo.-sr.l • t -..1 It 1. L..1 RVOHIMO .gyp �KTL • ' CJ40vA9 AM/NINa • . - . _ Ph '1 _ - -r t I d..I" M'-0. . 161-% 4'.O•• • Prw41'S fb41T ♦..4DdLsCr 4 IiA z11 -.1e--• • -• C gym.. .. • a' j t UAW WY• PIA. R.. SOUTH/SIDE ELEVATION a..g,.el'..,. bfW..i D®ct.RAT1vt gn..,. -\ 111 11 . • :.. . . _ t '• .. • _ O • ....... / \ ❑ ' ^L---• --t-r'',;f, r r' 4 P-4•1‘,.. • Aw N! N4 .. •i ` ' 4 ...... . _ ce.Nc x4415-Fuuri . W IYLio I • !!S"L_ m ��:�__( T 6yw"i91csuT �II!1It • ' r ... y�. DP►lGL ( � ) I :./ 1/`/ \ 1 I .- rArPrEeaPI ML:3 •11 - • - Y �° ®.:rum_, -- _ �- ttw.♦.e4. © • ---_'—'.--� 7 �\NISI [._ _- o+w.. o�car•Iv, AM111fi Ml. -v.'� . I A WEST/FRONT ELEVATION 4L.94e•11-0' •1 Al AUTO DIO P I a Y ',1 .;,� y... , ':. • ! : .. .., ! I❑ a A WIUOovv I9GH110uLB D 00 Pk ocomPu1.S • WIDTH A I' 1616 M T K ntrac.M060 HArge+Al• TYYa (L .b NA RKb wIPTMx 4.w1' T14(4CII 40 ►WQ'aBi•6 :TV'a .: 6iR aaPARK ^'I I . 1 (� tI A 1 41-# JA 1/-O'} L"TNit,.AWM ' Gu.S.s/ M w WiX 1D b ;MO NPS TTz 1se1 Ml>WY 61La I� y,// Pa1H'1RC2.416tl lee&aDn. / {0P. AIAll... OWltli. i P e • , .;,y + . , f ;.•-•;',•• , i s i? .. 1 1 .� _ ... O O Q O . fiuntY • O A'-.0. A I d -o r e 1, 1 W Y JI` 1'dK. 4.Z414' fell %!Ci D bV. D9 ® e',0" et P.S�' M 1 9/d� i O19 wo.t., • : • 1 . '31-•''' g' -o" $ ya'1.1•126w+ FIxaP : 0 21-14,r 4'-0"tg I aha' 1e9 Ii.. . .j.=,...'.7.. Win WAJ.L Tr s0eM1Y a G ROUND FLOOR PLAN - . -.. . 1 .. j• I�/Vy�y .1e3�1.; ,.'-'. �je ' F .. .A76fp9Ib'id. II t.: . I. f badPs AVM. S QilO./ 41 (BFIOT) @10 Ill: tk •p..1 IJAT. ARAOt /.. gMy'T •UIIT-urRnir I •w1,1. wp.¢ • u11*T. i■ wD.G.J. SEC TIO N 11 N•w 2. wD LFII►Lli 611 11.1*4J1..►TIDI • NGw •41i w11 DIAAN • • \ / • \• \ // \ \ \ \ / \ / , \ / v.11 4./1Y. •L.• ■ A- A ,h•,_ ,_� Tar OF V Dia FLny CON C. RooF. CAP WD. 41•6 /.T N•w rooi. H6w uwp CAI. Ter rt. r 41soAND Frl..11111 NW Nfw LRMT G VENO FL.f1N. rL. LAWMDALt. C Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 20, 1990 Regular Meeting of September 25, 1990 SUBJECT: EDISON / SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC MERGER PURPOSE: TO EXAMINE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED MERGER Recommendation Submit comments to the Public Utilities Commission regarding the inadequacies of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in relation to the impacts and mitigation measures noted below (If approved, a letter for the Mayor's signature will be prepared). Background The Southern California Edison Company has proposed a merger with San Diego Gas and Electric. As a result of this merger, there will be an increased use of power plants, including the Redondo Plant, in the Los Angeles area. The increased usage could have significant environmental impacts. Summary The Redondo Beach Planning Staff has extensively examined the Draft EIR and supplement. The details of their analysis are' attached. In summary, four environmental impacts which could impact Hermosa Beach as well Redondo Beach are as follows: NOISE: It was found that the EIR was not adequate in addressing the noise impact with current use or future increased use of the Edison Plant as a result of the merger. However, of the 8 steam boilers, only the 4 furthest from Hermosa Beach are planned to be used during the study period (1990-2007); nevertheless, without a thorough study, potential noise impacts cannot be addressed, and mitigated. AIR EMISSIONS: Air quality in the Los Angeles Basin will be impacted, and the mitigation is exceptionally vague. No examination of the air quality impact for the immediate area was conducted. LOCAL FISHERIES: As a result of the increased use of the plant, which sucks in seawater for cooling purposes, could result in a 4 to 87 reduction in the fish population region -wide as a result of entrainment (sucking small fish and larvae into the seawater inlet pipes). The mitigation measure is to restore wetlands in Huntington Beach, and the Ventura area. 1 HAZARDOUS WASTE AND MATERIAL: As a result of stringent air emission regulations in. the South Coast air basin, the increase use of the power plant will require the use of ammonia (NH3). Since ammonia is classified as a hazardous material, the transportation and transfer of the material does represent a risk. Further effort to reduce air emissions will also need to dispose of 52 tons of hazardous waste per Redondo Beach plant. OVERALL PROJECT: In addition to the Redondo Beach a summary of the overall project, alternatives, mitigation measures has been attached. CONCLUSION: Although the proposed project is of regional concern, the EIR should have still addressed in some respect the potential local impacts more extensively, and provided mitigation measures that were more localized. It is hard to find any equity in restoring wetlands in Huntington Beach and Ventura when the impact is in the South Bay. Further, for the Los Angels region to supply the electrical power and suffer all the environmental consequences for the future economic growth of San Diego is also questionable. result in the year from the staff report, impacts, and CONCUR: Kevin B. Northc'raft City Manger Attachments 1. Redondo Beach staff report. 2. Summary of EIR 3. Letter from Public Utilities Commission 4. Outline of information by Edison regarding merger, and effort to mitigate problems. Respectfully su Ali t•ed, Michael Schu•ac Planning Director 2 benefits of p/ccsredis City of Redondo Beach September 18, 1990 1 SCE Merger TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Harlan J. Curwick, Community Development Director SUBJECT: REVIEW OF MERGER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY WITH SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC. RECOMMENDATION: In view of the analysis conducted regarding the proposed merger, it is recommended that staff be directed to provide appropriate responses to the California Public Utilities Commission regarding issues identified in this report. It is further recommended that the City Council concur in staff's evaluation that at this point, absent complete and thorough mitigation, the merger between the two utilities should not be supported. REPORT ORGANIZATION: Southern California Edison Company (SCE) has proposed to merge with San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E). This report provides analysis of the potential effects of the merger on the City of Redondo Beach and the South Bay area in general. This report is substantially based on evaluation of environmental review documents prepared for the Public Utilities Commission (lead agency) and further contains information contained from interviews and telephone conversations with SCE representatives, interested agencies, groups, and individuals. In preparing this document, staff has attempted to avoid the use of extremely technical terms and scientific language, and has rather focused the evaluation on the probable results of a merged operation between the two utilities. This report initially provides a project overview and discusses the most' likely scenario resulting from a merger of the two utilities. Included in this discussion are the best statistical estimates of electrical production at the Redondo Beach facility. The second major division of the report is devoted to analysis of specific expected environmental impacts of the merger. Included in this 3 • 2 SCE Merger discussion is analysis pertaining to such issues as noise generation, air emissions, fish population, and hazardous waste. Discussion of the abilities of the City to regulate and provide input on the operation of the utility(utilities) is contained in the third section of the report. The final section contains a summary of conclusions and. recommendations to mitigate impacts identified in conjunction with the merger. PROJECT OVERVIEW: On December 16, 1988, SCE and SDG&E filed an application with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) proposing to merge the two utilities. Subsequent to the filing, questions arose as to the potential environmental impacts of a merger between the two utilities and whether the project should be subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On February 8, 1989, an administrative law judge determined that the merger - was subject to CEQA and established the CPUC as the lead agency. Several environmental review documents have been prepared and circulated including: a proponents environmental assessment (PEA), a draft environmental impact report (DEIR),: and a supplemental DEIR. The response period onthe draft documents is open until October 9, 1990. (See chronology for specific dates/events.) The merger will result in physical and operational changes including the deferral of constructing generating resources in San Diego and operating power plants to meet the combined demands of both service areas. The Redondo Beach electrical generating facility consists of eight (8) steam boiler units which use either natural gas or fuel oil to heat water into steam which drives a turbine to generate electricity. The Redondo Beach facility is among the larger steam generation plants in the SCE and SDG&E network having a present generating capacity of 1,310 megawatts (MW). Only Alamitos (1950 MW, near Long Beach), Ormond Beach (1500 MW, near Ventura), and South Bay (1600 MW, San Diego) presently have capacities in excess of Redondo Beach. Units 1-4 in Redondo Beach are inactive and are considered to be in a state of "cold standby." All analyses reviewed by staff show that Units 1-4 should'remain inactive throughout the study period (1990-2007). Further, discussions with Edison representatives indicate that 12-18 months would be required to restart any of 3 SCE Merger the four units. Restart of these units is unlikely as their small capacity and inefficient design would require extraordinary retrofitting expenditures for a relatively small power production increase. The majority of power generated from the Redondo Beach facility comes from units 7'and 8, each of which is rated at 480 MW. To a lesser extent, units 5 and 6 are capable of providing 175 MW each. Throughout the period from 1990 to 2007 electrical demand is projected to increase between 125-250%. with or without the merger. Environmental documents reviewed also indicate that the merger could account for between 25-35% of the total increase in a maximum impact scenario. Because of projected increased demands, the Redondo Beach Facility is to fairly steadily increase in production from 22% of load to 32% between 1990 and 2007 under non -merged conditions. Merged conditions may result in load conditions of 25% to 34%. Environmentaldocuments show that the merger is projected to increase plant load at Redondo Beach up to 5% on an annual basis over non -merged conditions. - The effects of the projected unmerged increased generation in conjunction with additional demands of the merger may be significant. The estimates contained in environmental documents reviewed by staff are based on such factors asarea and regional growth, power plant modernization (increase in efficiency), and fluctuations in generation due to reduction in productions during periods of equipment refurbishment in addition to a number of other variables. The environmental assessment has attempted to utilize "worst case" scenarios in formulating mitigation measures. However, in staff's opinion, significant questions exist with respect to the nature and extent of local impacts because of the extremely limited site-specific investigation conducted and the broad inferences made in environmental documents. SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF MERGER: The merger appears to result in only moderate increases in generation thoughout the network. However, these increases in conjunction with projected non -merged increases are significant on a local basis. In review of the environmental documents prepared to date, staff has raised significant questions regarding the site-specific or local impacts basdd on the level of review conducted in the environmental studies and the lack of analysis of the local area. Each issue and analysis of local effect is presented below. 4 SCE Merger NOISE: As a result of increased electrical, generation under both the merged and unmerged scenarios, the residents of the City of Redondo Beach will be subjected to increased noise generation. Residents of the City of Hermosa Beach will also be impacted by the additional production. Staff has raised significant questions in response to the "site-specific" sampling method conducted in conjunction with the environmental impact reports. Specifically, only one noise measurement was taken on December 29, 1989, on Herondo Street at a distance of approximately 800'. At the time of this measurement only unit 5 was operational, and unit 7 in start-up mode. Although noise generation is projected to increase +1 to +2 decibels without the merger as a result of increased area demand, it is important to note that many residents are presently affected by the existing operations. Although the City is in the process of formulating a new noise ordinance and despite the fact that the environmental documents indicate efforts will be made to mitigate noise impacts through increased monitoring and mitigation, little quantifiable data has been reviewed in studies to date. Further, the accuracy of the one noise measurement conducted as a.site-specific example in the DEIR is questionable as a truly representative analysis of local conditions. Staff would expect that a full acoustical analysis of the Redondo Beach facility is warranted in view of the studies conducted to date which indicate that noise is a significant impact which will require extensive monitoring and mitigation. Staff questions the reliability of the noise generation estimation in view of the limited acoustical evaluation. Even assuming a one - decibel increase, it is clear that the residents of Redondo Beach and other local communities are presently subjected to substantial noise impacts. Any increase in generation must be thoroughly analyzed and fully mitigated. Staff has formulated comments in response to the methodology and mitigation proposed by the DEIR and the supplemental DEIR to address this issue. Interviews with Edison officials have demonstrated a willingness to participate in noise mitigation efforts. Edison has also commented that at least 2 million dollars has been expended in reducing noise impacts of the Redondo Beach facility. AIR EMISSIONS: . The merger of SCE and SDG&E will result in significant air emissions and a consequent decrease in basinwide air quality. Conversion of internal 6 5 SCE Merger combustion (IC) engines has been proposed to mitigate the impacts of increased electrical generation in the South Coast Air Basin. SCE is also bound under the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1135 to reduce emissions into the local air basin. SCE has proposed a program to convert approximately 36,000 horsepower of internal combustion engines to electric motors to offset the emissions impact of the merger. The EIR does not present any identification of the location of the engines to be converted nor present any schedule for conversion. The local air quality effects of increased production are not addressed in environmental documents. Certainly, existing production and the effects of any increased production warrant further evaluation. LOCAL FISHERIES: As a result of existing and increased generation from the Redondo Beach facility, local fish populations will experience significant impacts. Steam boiler power operation facilities utilize an enormous quantity of water for cooling purposes. The most significant effect of cooling water use is the reduction in fish population caused by "entrainment", the capture and killing of fish and larvae through power plant intake systems. Under the "worst case" scenario, cooling water use could increase 48,169 million gallons at the Redondo Beach facility. This increase could result in an approximately 5 percent •reduction in local fish population. Local fish population reductions could. exceed 4 percent for 11 years between 1990 and 2007. It should also be noted that the.regionwide reduction under the worst case scenario could exceed 8 percent. The twelve primary fish species impacted by increased power production are not considered major sport or recreational fishing varieties. However, a reduction in these species does impact other varieties of recognized sport and commercial fish species as well as related marine organisms. It is estimated that power plants may impact as many as 100 varieties of fish. All environmental documents reviewed to date recognize the reduction in fish populations as a significant effect of the merger and result of increased power generation. However, mitigation measures proposed are limited to restoration of wetlands in Huntington Beach and the Ventura area. It is estimated that between 13 and 28 acres of wetlands must be restored to compensate for the effects of the merger. 6 SCE Merger Staff must raise significant questions with respect to the ability of this region -wide mitigation measure to offset the substantial local impact. Historically, the abundance of recreational fishing and sport fishing has played an important role in Redondo Beach's local economy. Any disturbance in this local economy certainly warrants further evaluation. Many alternatives to reduce current and increased power generation impacts on local fisheries exist. Among these are more advanced intakes for cooling water resulting in a reduction in fish entrainment and installation of diffusing structures on discharge facilities. In terms of importance, the intake controls are drastically more important as the non-selective processing of millions of gallons of cooling water results in the majority of fish and fish larvae kill. The conclusion of the DEIR is that the merger will have a significant impact on local fish populations. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND MATERIALS: Because all scenarios require additional generation from existing Edison facilities and in view of the stringent regulations pertaining to air emission in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), SCE must employ the use of air pollution reduction control techniques. Increased truck transportation of hazardous waste and chemicals on local streets, use of these products on site, and disposal of these products is projected from the merger. The addition of air emissions control equipment can result in the increased exposure of the public to hazardous waste. Several systems for the control of air emissions exist for steam boiler type power generation facilities. Currently available technology primarily involves the use of Ammonia (NH3) products. Ammonia is classified as a hazardous material. The reaction of Ammonia with exhaust gas from power plant combustion creates nitrogen gas and water, both relatively inert compounds. Despite the relatively non -hazardous nature of these by-products, the transportation and transfer of Ammonia does represent a significant environmental risk. Other technologies such as the transportaion and use of Urea (a dry compound which converts to Ammonia upon adding water) exist. The transportation and use of Ammonia represents significant environmental risk which has not been adequately addressed under the merged or non -merged conditions presented in the environmental documents. g 7 SCE Merger Despite the available technology, none of the plants operated by SCE currently use the comparatively safer Urea injection method according to environmental documents reviewed. Based on a review of environmental documents, a Urea system may be installed on Redondo Beach facilities between 1991 and 1993. However, this projection in the environmental document clearly conflicts with present applications from Edison to proceed with a demonstration air quality control system on one of Redondo Beach's 480 MW generators. The DEIR does disclose the fact that one 480 MW unit must be tested with controls under AQMD Rule 1135. Following the installation of either a Urea or Ammonia system, reports reviewed indicate that Selectic Catalystic Reduction (SCR) will be added to the emissions controls at Redondo Beach facilities between 1995 and 1999. This process enhances the air emissions reduction above and beyond the injection systems. The SCR process results in the need to dispose of - additional hazardous waste in the form of metals. sludge. In the worst - case scenario up to 52 tons per year of waste must be disposed of. Although all reports reviewed do not provide conclusive information regarding the exact nature and extent of hazardous waste expected from the merger and required emission controls with or without the merger, staff would certainly raise substantial concern with the transportation and transfer of Ammonia products, metals sludge, and other chemicals. LOCAL CONTROLS: As of the writing of this report, the City Attorney is investigating the review authority and regulatory abilities of the City with respect to the operation and merger. Attorneys from SCE has presented arguments to the City Attorney to support a relatively autonomous relationship. No conclusions regarding this relationship have been reached as of this writing. Despite the disputed local regulatory abilities, avenues exist to ensure a thorough evaluation of the local impact of the existing and future operation of generating facilities in the City of Redondo Beach. The primary vehicle to ensure mitigation of impacts is available through the environmental review process as prescribed by CEQA. Local ordinances and controls may also be available to provide a substantial mitigation of impacts. =However, staff is awaiting response from the City Attorney as to the nature and extent of local authority. 8 SCE Merger SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: After review of the proposed merger, staff concludes that the project may have significant adverse environmental impacts on the local area which have not been thoroughly explored. Absent a necessary site-specific local impact analysis, staff can only conclude that further study is necessary on a variety of issues prior to certification of environmental documents. In staff's opinion, the following issues must be thoroughly evaluated, and any significant impacts identified must be fully mitigated. * A full acoustical analysis must be performed on the Redondo Beach facility prior to the merger authorization rather than a post merger monitoring and mitigation program. The extremely limited evaluation contained in environmental documents regarding noise is inadequate to determine the impact on Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach residents. Further, discussion as to specific noise attenuation measures required - for the Edison facility must be fully disclosed in the environmental documents. * Specific local mitigation measures including the best technology to reduce fish population reduction should be employed. The impact on local marine resources and the economic effects of local fish population reduction have not been fully examined nor mitigated in staff's opinion. Many alternatives have not been examined such as fish salvage structures, intakes which reduce entrainment (killing of fish and larvae in intakes) and. local population restoration such as the creation of artificial reefs. No studies of the economic value of local recreational and sport fishing are included in the environmental documents nor discussion of the impact of the merger on these local assets. 9 SCE Merger * The production, transfer, and transportation of hazardous waste, particularly Ammonia products and metals sludge has not been adequately addressed on a local site-specific basis. Uncertainty as to pollution control technology retrofits and estimates of Ammonia usage at the Redondo Beach facilities are significant. Certainly, a thorough evaluation of hazardous materials production, storage, transportation and transfer is essential on a local basis. Also, evaluation of Urea use versus Ammonia must be considered due to high population concentrations near the Redondo Beach Edison facility. ared by RON S. ON Associate P1er ASJ:ts Apppr ved by: HARLAN J CURWICK Community Development Director BACKGROUND MATER/AC Page 10 SCE Merger CHRONOLOGY December 16, 1988 Application filed with Public Utilities Commission to merge utilities. January 25, 1989 February 8, 1989 April 7, 1989 Date Unknown June 16, 1989 July 20-25, 1989 April 9, 1990 August 24, 1990 October 9, 1990 City of San Diego files motion for an administrative law judge to determine if project is subject to CEQA. Presiding judge determines that project is subject to CEQA. Edison ordered to file Proponents Environmental Assessment (PEA). California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) reviews PEA and determines that an EIR should be prepared. Notice of Preparation (NOP) issued by CPUC. Scoping meetings conducted. Draft EIR prepared and circulated. Supplemental Draft EIR prepared and circulated. Deadline for response to Supplemental EIR. 4 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 w 1 1 1 1 1 1 CHAPTER 3. Summary of Findings PROJECT SUMMARY The proposed merger of SCE and SDG&E would combine planning, operations, maintenance, and administration of the two utilities. Electricity customers in the current SCE territory and electricity and gas customers in the current SDG&E territory would be served by a single operation. SCE's objective for the merger is to increase operational efficiency while maintaining service levels. The proposed merger would result in physical and operational changes to the existing utility systems. Physical changes would include: o deferring construction of generating resources in the San Diego area, o cancelling or relocating planned transmission and substation facilities in the - Orange County/San Diego County area, and o reducing and redeploying personnel from SCE and SDG&E facilities in the San Diego and Los Angeles areas. Operational changes would include: o restructuring current SCE operations to include San Diego operations as a fifth division; o operating power plants to meet the combined electrical load of both utility service areas, which is expected to increase use of existing SCE plants and decrease generation loads at SDG&E facilities; and o restructuring utility operations to eliminate duplicative positions. SDG&E gas operations are expected to be unaffected by the proposed merger. The alternative used as the Impacts of SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES No -Project Alternative, also described as the unmerged case, is the principal considered in this EIR. The conditions under the No -Project. Alternative are baseline for comparing impacts of the proposed merger and other alternatives. the No -Project Alternative are also compared with existing conditions. 3-1 13 -. Other alternatives that could achieve the broad project objective of providing electricity to southern California with potentially greater efficiency and less environmental impact also are considered. The following alternatives evaluated in this EIR could be implemented regardless of the status of the merger and are not mutually exclusive: o Joint Dispatch and Sharing of Resources Alternative, o Increased Conservation Alternative, o Increased Reliance on Out -of -Basin Power Alternative, o Repowering Alternative, and o Alternative Resource Plan Alternative. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Impact Overview Table 3-1 summarizes the incremental and cumulative impacts of the proposed merger and recommended mitigation measures by topic area. All the impacts are addressed in detail in Chapters 4 through 10. Most impacts are considered less than significant relative to the No -Project Alternative, i.e., there would be a minimal difference in future conditions with the proposed merger compared to future conditions without the proposed merger. All impacts related to hazardous materials and safety, and transportation and circulation, are considered less than significant. The significant adverse impacts of the proposed merger relative to the No -Project Alternative include: o an incremental and cumulative increase in emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), oxides of sulfur (SOx), and other related air pollutants in the South Coast, South Central Coast, and Southeast Desert Air Basins; o an incremental and cumulative increase in groundwater consumption in the Lower Mojave River groundwater basin; o a cumulative increase in cooling water use at Alamitos, Huntington Beach, and Redondo Beach power plants, contributing to a local and Bightwide deciine in is eries resources; o an incremental increase in local noise levels associated with power output in some years at El Cajon Substation, Etiwanda (1993), Huntington Beach (1990), and San Bernardino (1997) power plants; and &cumulative increase in local noise levels at Etiwanda and San Bernardino plants; Table 3-1. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Merger Page 1 of 5 Impact Level of Significance . Mitigation Level of Significance after Mitigation Air Quality Net regionwide reduction in NOx, SOx, and other related air pollutants in southern California Net reduction in NOx, SOx, and other related air pollutants in the San Diego Air Basin Net increase in NOx, SOx, and other related air pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin, the South Central Coast Air Basin, and the Southeast Desert Air Basin Water Resources and Fisheries Slight increase in discharge temperatures for most scawater-coolcd power plants B B S None required None required Accelerate NOX reductions from other nonutility sources. Accelerate NOx control retrofit schedules, and/or require additional NOx control demonstration programs. Require the merged utility to modify its dispatch order so that a South Coast Air Basin or Ventura generating unit would displace a San Diego unit only if the difference in operating costs would be greater than a predeter- mined percentage and/or so that plants would be dispatched based on their relative NOx emissions, rather than economic considerations, during peak pollution periods. Replace existing generating units with more efficient and lower polluting units without simultaneously shifting generation to the load centers. Identify conservation measures applicable to plants in the affected areas. Require use of natural gas except during curtailments to reduce emissions of SOx and other pollutants. None required LS Table 3-1. Continued Impact Level of Significance Mitigation Paee 2 of 5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Increase in groundwater consumption at some plants where groundwater is water source: Chino and Upper Santa Ana River groundwater basins Lower Mojave River groundwater basin Local reductions in fish populations because of increased cooling water use Cumulative increases in water temperature exacerbated by seawater -cooled power plants in the Pacific Ocean, Santa Monica Bay, Long Beach Harbor, and San Diego Bay Cumulative increase in consumption of groundwater in S the Lower Mojave groundwater basin LS S None required Use alternative sources of water in the region, or purchase alternative supplies from the Colorado River aqueduct. None required LS None required Cumulative increase in cooling water use, contributing to local and Bightwide decline in fisheries resources: Alamitos, Huntington Beach, and Redondo Beach Bightwide Hazardous Materials and Safety Increased offsite disposal of metals sludge Increased human exposure to metals sludge and environmental contamination at plant sites S LS LS LS Implement measures described above to reduce increased consumption of groundwater by individual stations. Reduce cooling water use, restore coastal wetlands, and/or construct artificial reefs. None required None required None required LS LS LS Table 3-1. Continued Impact Level of Significance Mitigation Page 3 of 5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Potential change in timing of offsite disposal of and LS human exposure to spent V2O5 catalyst material from SCR units p, IT Increased human exposure and health risk from ammonia storage Cumulative increase in generation of hazardous wastes Noise Increase in local noise levels associated with power output in some years at some plants: Alamitos, Division Substation, El Segundo, Encina, High Grove, Naval Station, Ormond Beach, Redondo Beach, Silver Gate, South Bay El Cajon Substation, Etiwanda (1993), Huntington Beach (1990), San Bernardino (1997) Cumulative increase in local noise levels at Etiwanda and San Bernardino power plants Socioeconomic Reduction of 1,505 direct and about 1,558 secondary jobs in San Diego County and deferral of creating new employment at Blythe power plant LS LS None required None required None required LS None required S S Begin noise monitoring on approval of the merger Wand implement required noise abatement techniques, including enclosures, insulation materials, and/or silencers. Implement measures described above to reduce increased noise generation by individual stations. LS None required LS LS oTN bN Table 3-1. Continued Impact Level of Significance Mitigation Page 4 of 5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Decline in population and housing demand in the City LS None required and County of San Diego and increase in population and housing demand in Los Angeles County because of job relocation Unknown effect on utility rates LS None required Cumulative reduction in employment in San Diego LS None required County Cumulative growth in population and housing demand in Los Angeles County LS None required Transportation and Circulation Deterioration of traffic conditions at intersections near LS None required SCE headquarters in Rosemead Cumulative deterioration of traffic conditions IS None required Electricity Transmission and Distribution Reduction in overall system reliability based on LS None required evaluation of service to the south Orange County area, economies of scale (opportunities to use lowest cost electricity sources), demand on SCE facilities, demand on SDG&E and SCE power lines from out-of-state purchases, reliance on off -system power purchases, frequency of brownouts, planning for load growth, day-to-day operations, and recovery from blackouts Increased exposure to electric and magnetic fields, i ILS % None required corona discharge, and induced currents in nearby objects M M l /n!. fit — am awn —I kal ES n ilk IS Ilk ES 11111 INN um ais Table 3-1. Continued Impact Level of Significance Mitigation Page 5of5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Increased noise levels affecting residential facilities - near power plants Adverse visual appearance of substations Potential loss of annual grassland, coastal scrub, and the associated common wildlife species Potential loss of coastal oak woodland and valley foothill riparian vegetation, nesting habitat for burrowing owls, San Fernando spineflower, and many - stemmed dudleya Loss of coastal scrub habitat for the orange -throated whiptail, golden eagle, and California black -tailed gnatcatcher Notes: B = beneficial. LS = less than significant. S = significant. = not applicable. �LS ; S LS S None required Include decorative walls and attractive landscaping around the substation sites; use low -profile construction design for the substations. None required Conduct site-specific surveys and avoid construction in these habitats. LS None required LS LS o potential loss of coastal oak woodland, valley foothill riparian vegetation, nesting habitat for burrowing owls, San Fernando spineflower, and many - stemmed dudleya from planned substation relocation; and o potential adverse visual effects of planned substation relocation. All of these significant impacts of the proposed merger could be mitigated to a less -than - significant level by implementing the mitigation measures summarized in Table 3-1. Significant impacts could also be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing one or more of the alternatives. The significant impacts and alternatives that would reduce them to less -than -significant levels are as follows: o Significant air quality impacts of increased emissions in all basins could be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing the Increased Conservation Alternative. o Significant NOx emissions in the Southeast Desert Air Basin could be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing the Repowering Alternative. o Significant emissions of SOx and other related pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin could be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing the Repowering Alternative. o Significant NOx emissions in all basins could be reduced to less -than - significant levels by implementing the Alternative Resource Plan Alternative. o Significant emissions of SOx and other related pollutants in all basins except South Coast could be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing the Alternative Resource Plan Alternative. o Significant groundwater consumption impacts in the Lower Mojave River groundwater basin could be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing the Increased Conservation, Repowering, and Alternative Resource Plan Alternatives. o Significant noise impacts at El Cajon Substation could be reduced to less - than -significant levels by implementing the Increased Conservation, Increased Reliance on Out -of -Basin Power, Repowering, and Alternative Resource Plan Alternatives. o'\, Significant noise impacts at the Etiwanda and Huntington Beach power plants could be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing the Increased Conservation and Increased Reliance on Out -of -Basin, Power Alternatives. o Significant noise impacts at the San Bernardino power plant could be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing the Joint Dispatch and Sharing of Resources, Increased Conservation, and Increased Reliance on Out -of - Basin Power Alternatives. 3-8 — �c- i i I i i i i i i o Potential loss of coastal oak woodland, valley foothill riparian vegetation, nesting habitat for burrowing owls, San Fernando spineflower, and many - stemmed dudleya caused by planned substation relocation could be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing any of the alternatives, but similar significant effects could potentially result elsewhere. o Potential adverse visual effects from planned substation relocation could be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing any of the alternatives, but similar significant effects could potentially result elsewhere. Significant cumulative impacts on local and Bightwide fisheries from increased use of cooling water at Alamitos, Huntington Beach, and Redondo Beach power plants could not be reduced to less -than -significant levels by implementing any of the alternatives. Growth -Inducing Impacts The principal growth -inducing impact in the SCE and SDG&E service areas resulting from the proposed mefger would be lower utility rates that could increase the attractiveness of relocation to the region by new energy -consuming industries. However, growth induced by the project would simultaneously be constrained by increased regulation and reduced availability of emission offsets for new air polluters, at least partially caused by the utility's operations. Similarly, the limited availability of water for new industries may be a constraint in some areas and could be exacerbated by increased consumption by the merged utility. A second growth -related impact of the proposed merger is the reduction and relocation of personnel by the merged utility, resulting in a decrease in population in San Diego County. Los Angeles County would experience slightly increased growth directly attributable to employment at SCE. Areas of Controversy and Unresolved Issues The analysis of certain impacts associated with the proposed merger depends on the results from operating production cost models. These models simulate how the power plant system will operate over the next 18 years. Many factors affect model operation; as a result, actual operating conditions may differ, sometimes substantially, from the model simulations. The modeling results obtained for this EIR were insufficient to analyze potential noise effects related to increased operations at individual power plants; consequently, additional studies were recommended to determine potential noise effects more precisely. The effects of excluding California Power Pool sales from the modeling runs also are unknown, although estimated merger-related impacts on air quality could be overstated. 3-9 The long-term horizon of the proposed merger increases the uncertainty associated with determining impacts. Potential construction -related effects of relocating planned substations on biological resources were found to be significant but could be mitigated easily by avoiding certain areas. The uncertainty associated with the siting of these facilities, as well as with defining conditions for other affected resources, required using a worst-case analytical approach that probably overstates actual impacts. 3-10 ..TE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Gerstner PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3291 August 24, 1990 To All Interested Persons: Enclosed is a Supplement to the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Supplement) on the proposed merger between Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas and Electric. The Supplement was prepared by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of the Supplement is to allow public review of new information and analyses contained in the revisions to the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). The Administrative Law Judges to the merger case determined that in light of the importance and complexity of this case, the Supplement to the DEIR will allow the public the fullest opportunity to review environmental impacts of the merger. The enclosed Supplement does not include portions of the DEIR that are not being revised. If reviewers do not yet have a copy of the DEIR, they will find it available for review at CPUC offices and public libraries throughout southern California. If you cannot arrange to review the document at one of these public locations, you may request a copy of the DEIR from the CPUC by calling Maryanna Michael at. (415) 557-7032. Written comments on the Supplement are due on October 9, 1990. All comments or questions should be sent to the following address: Bill Edmonds California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 3102 San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 557-3993 Thank •u for your continued interest in the Commission's proce ngs. rly, EAL J xecut SHULMAN e Director Enclosure REDONDO GENERATING STATION CREATIVE MEASURES 6 e 7UC-E- Nb 5 e_ e-1,15 1 • MODIFIED CONTROL SYSTEM N • ADJUSTED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES • OPERATION & MAINTENANCE CHANGES FOR START UP 1> P4-, `n M c - 5 a- -'J 5 :// 4uh c1052-41 4c) REDONDO GENERATING STATION geiv "°s° via d 00J 4(+ 17S • +h +u F—/ouf-eC-b, -- 1 f -a Z-15264/4 4'"(L • COOPERATIVE PROGRAM WITH CITY - rto 6 -00r -o w/ • MAJOR WORK COMPLETE: NOISE MITIGATION PROGRAM O 2 -YEAR PROGRAM o $2 MILLION SPENT o COMMIT TO 64 DECIBELS AT PROPERTY LINE W1,dkA5 k,,1 — 409 • ADDITIONAL WORK IDENTIFIED: o $500,000 MORE TO BE SPENT • • WILLINGNESS TO SOLVE ISOLATED PROBLEMS • DESIROUS TO HAVE CITY ADOPT AMENDED NOISE ORDINANCE EDISON/SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC - MERGER • CONSOLIDATION OF TWO COMPANIES TO MEET CHALLENGES AHEAD. • BENEFITS: o CUSTOMER SAVINGS OF $1.7 BILLION o LOWER ELECTRIC RATES o BETTER SERVICE o EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES o GREATER DIVERSITY OF RESOURCES o MORE CONSERVATION PROGRAMS o ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION EDISON/SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC - MERGER THE PROCESS • MERGER MUST BE APPROVED BY THE FERC AND CPUC • HEARINGS HELD AND COMPLETED • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED • FINAL DECISIONS BY THE FERC AND CPUC PENDING EDISON/SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC - MERGER MEANING TO THE CITY OF REDONDO BEACH • NO PLANS TO REACTIVATE FOUR OLDER UNITS • NO CHANGE IN OPERATION OF REMAINING UNITS FROM 34X) PAST TEN YEARS out. r,✓614, &PtS o /s (6-feY • INSTALLATION OF EMISSION CONTROL EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT • PROACTIVE NOISE MITIGATION PROGRAM • CONTINUED ENHANCEMENT OF RECREATION AND SPORT FISHING FROM WARM WATER DISCHARGES • pv04,/uM w/ 141Yom! mAtry (iTli o� i oh(dt C su z. — iS 0 ccQ,t, s I w t( e ,J&& • CPUC CONCLUDED NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • 4 -r ; PA iu L6 F -o iAtd 0J6�1 k M Gl11 " EDISON/SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC - MERGER OUR PLEDGE: • QUALITY SERVICE • GOOD NEIGHBORS 4000 �:vw REDO O DO I ACV ►l C (ENIE(HAT IIN61 SII%1`II IlON ��' 6\ I' 1 11��c�c�11 m I1--111� 01 IU'' W V J !/�� L I V U vU`vJ ��II \I �J � f -i �J �� FA r..5.1R0 ED 3500 I.'.. ..._. _ _. 2500 H ..i. ■ 1 1 2000 Tin _■t■ 15nn ■lloimm mum NI 1000 500 o IMlt 1.1 _N 1.1 ■ 11..1.1.11.1. ■ 1.111111 EM OU 3000 PROJECTED EM!SS!nNS WITH MERGER REDD0113 1 1981 1983 1986 1987 1989 1991 1993 1996 1997 1999 2001 2003 2006 2007 * 1990 estimate ANNUAL NOx EMISSIONS September 18, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 25, 1990 RESULTS OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REPORT CIP 89-141, STREET REHABILITATION Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept the Pavement Management Program Report as prepared by Infrastructure Management Services as complete at a final cost of $18,250. 2. Authorize staff to proceed with preparing plans and specifications for Street Rehabilitation, CIP 89-141. 3. Set as a goal to improve the average condition of the street system from a value of 72 to a value of 75 over the next five years. Background: On February 27, 1990, Council awarded an agreement to Infrastructure Management Services (IMS) at a cost not to exceed $20,075. On June 22, 1990, Council adopted the FY 90-91 Budget which includes CIP 89-141, Street Rehabilitation and CIP 89-170, Slurry Sealing. IMS has surveyed and tested all streets City-wide and submitted the final Pavement Management Program Report. The report has been revised to staff's satisfaction and is complete. An executive summary of the report is available for review in the City Clerk's Office. The consultant will be present during the Council meeting to give a brief presentation of the report. Analysis: The analysis is divided as follows: 1. What does the report provide? 2. What is the present condition of the City's street system? 3. Three scenarios for the City's street system. 4. Recommended rehabilitation strategies. 1. What Does the Report Provide? The pavement management program report provides the following information about the City's street system. A. Inventory Listing An inventory of all City streets listed alphabetically and broken down block by block. The inventory shows the type of street: local, collector or arterial, its surface type, width, length, ride quality and traffic volume. B. Priority Report The streets are listed from the best condition to the worst condition on a block by block basis. C. Pavement Condition Report Streets are listed showing surface conditions such as ride quality, and cracking and the structural strength of the street. D. Contributing Factors Report Streets are listed showing environmental distresses such as poor drainage or shoulders and type of cracking. E. Pavement Improvement Report Nine separate rehabilitation strategies were analyzed for each street. The report shows the amount of pavement improvement for each strategy. F. Investment Benefit Report A cost -benefit analysis is performed for each street grouping over a five-year period. The most cost effective strategy and the best year to perform that strategy are listed for the highest benefit per dollars spent. G. Management Report The entire street system's present condition of 72 and the condition at the end of five years with no improvements are both shown. Also shown are streets selected for rehabilitation using the proposed five-year budget and the funding that would be required to maintain the street system at its present average condition over the five year period. Shown below is the effect of street rehabilitation expenditures on the street systems condition at the end of five years. Action Spend Nothing Present Budget Maintain Exiting Level Improve System Wait for 5 Years, Then Construct Condition in 5 Years 57 59 72 75 72 Expenditure $ 0 million 1.2 million 6.1 million 7.7 million 11.1 million H. Street sections are grouped, usually several blocks, showing the user benefit ratio. The higher the traffic flow and the better the street's condition, the higher the user benefit. If two streets are in equally poor condition, the one with the higher traffic flow would normally be rehabilitated first because the rehabilitation will benefit more users. 2. What is the Present Condition of the City's Street System? The City's street system is assigned a number between 0 (the worst possible condition) and 100 (the best possible condition). Each block on each street in the City is rated between 0 and 100, then the average is taken for the whole street system. Shown below is a chart to illustrate the conditions. Streets should not be allowed to fall below a 60 values which is the point where reconstruction is required: IMS Condition* 85-100 80-84 70-79 60-69 40-59 0-40 Shown below are conditions: IMS Condition* Description Excellent Good Acceptable Fair Poor Very Poor example streets Street Rehabilitation Required Minor Patching Sealing/Thin Overlay Thin to Thick Overlays Thicker Overlays/Reconst. Surface/Base Reconst. Total Reconstruction illustrating a range of 92 Longfellow Ave. 82 Amby Place 71 Myrtle Ave. 62 20th Street 50 Hollowell 40 5th Street From To Hermosa Ave. Valley Dr. Power Street Valley Dr. Prospect PCH * Factors considered in the condition number include structural strength of the pavement and surface distresses such as cracking, rutting, etc. Therefore, the appearance and ride quality of the pavement surface does not always indicate its true total condition. The pie chart illustrates the percentage of total area of streets by condition. 70-79 18% 80-84 14% 40% of the City's streets are in good condition above an 80 condition level, these streets will require only routine maintenance such as crack sealing, patching and slurry sealing over the next five years. 27% of the City's streets lie in the 40-59 range. These streets require reconstruction. By deferring reconstruction on these streets to a later time, costs will not rise sharply. However, 32% of the City's streets are in the 60-79 range. It is critical to apply rehabilitation strategies such as overlays to these streets to avoid costly reconstructions in later years. By concentrating rehabilitation on this "middle" grouping of streets in the 60-79 range, it would be cheaper in the long run than to "let things go". By raising the average condition of the street system from a 72 to a 75 would prevent streets in the middle grouping from deteriorating into the 40-59 grouping. It should be noted that by closer analysis on a street -by -street basis, staff would most likely be able to reduce construction costs by appropriately designing the projects. Averaging the condition of all the City streets yields at the present time an overall condition level of 72.2. This indicates an average level which is marginally acceptable. IMS has tested 19 other agencies in California whose street systems ranged in condition from 69 to 84 with an average of 76. Thus, Hermosa Beach is below average compared to these agencies. 3. Three Scenarios for the City's Street System The Street System policy decision for Council for the next five years is: a. Do nothing b. Maintain the same condition level c. Improve the condition level 3a. Do Nothing: This alternative explores the effect of spending $0 over the next five years. The present condition number of 72.2 would drop to 57.1. This would result in moving from a routine maintenance level to a high maintenance level. "Routine" maintenance refers to crack sealing, and patching with some overlays and occasional reconstructs. "High" maintenance refers to many more reconstructs. Once a street's condition falls below a 60, a total reconstruction is usually required and routine maintenance is not sufficient. Should $0 dollars be spent over the next five years it would cost an estimated $11.1 million to bring the street system's condition from a 57.1 back up to the present level of 72.2. It would cost approximately $6.1 million to maintain the street system at 72 for the same time period. Thus, there would be a potential loss of as high as $5.0 million by delaying all rehabilitation for five years. Pavement Condition Service Life (%) 100 80 60 40 20 ,,,,,,,,,,/„/,,,,,,,,/„ /;i,/ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,/,,,,,,/,,,,/,,,,,,,,,,/,,,, 72.2 ($6.1 Million) •,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,/„/,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,/„ 57.1 ($11.1 Million) Pavement Life (Varies -depending on pavement type) 3b. Maintain the Street System: Another alternative is to maintain the same condition level of the street system over the next five years. This alternative would cost approximately $6.1 million to maintain the street system's average condition of 72.2 as shown in the graph below. Rehabilitation strategies required would be asphalt overlays for approximately 63 blocks of street and reconstructs for approximately 37 blocks of street. HERMOSA BEACH PERFORMANCE LEVEL VS. DOLLARS AT THE END OF 5 YEARS BUDGET $ IN MILLIONS 12 10 8 6 4 0 55 60 65 70 75 PERFORMANCE LEVEL 80 85 mwrnurnra Iumcmrr SERnm 3c. Improve the Street System: A third alternative is to improve the street system's average condition of 72.2 to a higher average condition. Referring to the graph above shows approximately how much it would cost to achieve an overall condition of the street system between 57 an 84. In the short term, the lowest cost alternative is to spend nothing. But as previously mentioned (in Section 3a.) this would result in greater expenditures in the long run. The question of what is the lowest cost alternative over the next five years is raised. One consideration is to prevent a significant number of streets to fall below the 60 condition level and thus avoid costly reconstruction. 4. Recommended Rehabilitation Strategies Staff has recommended various strategies to rehabilitate deficient streets. The Pavement Management System selects from among nine strategies which include slurry sealing, crack sealing, five different asphalt overlay strategies and two reconstruction strategies. Staff has identified most asphalt streets west of Valley Drive to be crack sealed, patched and slurry sealed in FY 90-91. This project is in the FY 90-91 budget as slurry sealing, CIP 89-170. Staff recommends raising the condition of the street system to a condition of 75.0. This could require overlays on approximately 63 blocks of street at a cost of $2.1 million and reconstruction of approximately 49 blocks of street at a cost of $5.6 million over a five year period. Selection of streets for overlay or reconstruction strategies is contingent upon available dollars in the FY 90-91. Please note that CIP 85-137, Overlay of Valley, Ardmore and Prospect is a separate project using outside funding and is not included as part of estimated rehabilitation costs. Fiscal Impact: Potential Revenue Shown below is total estimated revenue from the State Gas Tax Fund for FY 90-91 through FY 94-95. FISCAL YEAR 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 ESTIMATE STATE GAS TAX $261,567 $261,567 $274,645 $288,378 $302,796 ESTIMATED PROP 111 TOTAL $60,000 $321,567 $72,000 $333,567 $84,000 $358,645 $96,000 $384,378 $100,800 $403,596 $1,388,953 $412,800 Planned Expenditures $1,801,753 Shown below are for FY 90-91 through FY 94-95 from the State Gas Tax Fund. CIP 89-141, Street Rehabilitation CIP 89-170, Slurry Sealing Total Identified Needs Estimated Funds Required (75.0 value) Estimated Funds Available Estimated Additional Funds Required $524,224 700,219 $1,224,443 $7,700,000 1,801,753 $5,898,247 Summary: The Pavement Management Program report shows the current condition of the street system. The report also projects what the street system's overall condition would be five years from now after spending between the limits of zero and over $10 million for improvements. Staff recommends raising the condition of the street system to a condition of 75.0. The first priority for rehabilitation should be on streets in the 60-79 condition range, not yet requiring reconstruction. By designing rehabilitation projects specific to the needs of each street, costs can be further reduced below the estimated amounts. Choosing to let the overall condition worsen, to maintain the overall condition of 72.2 or to improve the street system to a better condition will determine the required expenditures over the next five years. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Maintain the street system at its current average condition of 72. This alternative requires estimated expenditures of $6.1 million over the next five years. 2. Allow the street system's condition to deteriorate to a lower condition, thereby requiring higher expenditures in the long run. 3. Attempt to raise the street system's average condition above the recommended 75 requiring more than $7.7 million over the next five years. Respectfully submitted, • Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance pwclerk/srcip141 Deputy City Engineer ., Agony Antich Director of Public Works evin B. Northctaft City Manager September 18, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 25, 1990 PUBLIC WORKS YARD RELOCATION, CIP 91-608 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council (contingent on payment by Macpherson Oil Company): 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement for feasibility study services to analyze two proposed public works yard relocation sites with Anthony and Langford Company at a cost not to exceed $21,000 ($19,740 plus contingency). 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda within budget limitations 3. Appropriate a not to exceed amount of $21,000 to cover both the report and any contingencies from the General Fund Designation for Capital Improvements to CIP 91-608. 4. Restore funds to the designation account in the amount received from Macpherson Oil Company. Background: At the January 23, 1990, Council meeting staff presented a report in which Macpherson Oil was requested to consider advancing the funds for this study. The project was put on hold until a response was provided from the oil company. Macpherson Oil Company tentatively agreed to fund the required study in order to fulfill the conditions of the environmental impact review process requiring the study of at least two alternatives. City Council's action was to receive and file the report. The City Council at their meeting of June 26, 1990, authorized staff to advertise and request proposals for an investigation of the relocation of the city yard to two potential sites. The request for proposal was reviewed by Macpherson Oil Company prior to mailing. The purpose of the feasibility study is to provide adequate information for the City Council to make a decision as to which of the two sites the City should pursue for the final site. The sites under consideration are the following: 1. Adjacent to the Community Center; south of Pier Avenue and east of Ardmore Avenue; 2. South School property, between Valley Drive and Monterey Boulevard and between 6th Street and 2nd Street. The staff publicly advertised for proposals on July 31, 1990, and a total of 17 request application forms were sent out. Seven proposals from interested consultants were submitted to the City by the due date of August 23, 1990. A summary of the proposals is attached to this report. Analysis: On September 17, 1990, the three lowest cost consultants were interviewed by a three member board consisting of Macpherson Oil Company and City Public Works staff. It was the unanimous decision of the board that Anthony and Langford was the most experienced and qualified consultant of the three interviewed. Also they were able to provide information on five different city yard projects that they had previously worked on in this area and that information was provided at the meeting. A total of 14 projects similar in nature to the City's project were referenced in their proposal. A copy of the full proposal is available for review in the City Clerk's office. A copy of the proposed scope of services and a time schedule of activities is attached. After reviewing the prices, Don Machperson is unwilling to expend money for the full cost of the required study. Mr. Macpherson wants to spend only enough money to pay for moving costs of the existing buildings at the city yard site. Staff asked all consultants to separate their proposal cost into two parts. Part A Part B The cost of moving the existing buildings to either of the two sites. For example, if moving required upgrading the building to meet current code , Mr. Macpherson indicated he would pay for the cost of the study. However, if the moving would improve the facility, this would be considered in Part B of the report. This portion would consider improvements to the yard. Consolidation of activities at a central work site is an important matter to be considered For example, building maintenance is located at a satellite location (not at the city yard) and its inclusion in the city yard would be considered an improvement. Part A Part B Total Anthony & Langford $17,766 1,974 19,740 BSI 12,605 1,550 14,155 JSA 18,038 1,854 19,892 Fiscal Impact: 1. No City funds shall be expended until Macpherson Oil Company deposits required funds for this study with the City. 2. The consultant has indicated that his costs will be separated into replacement costs and expansion costs categories. It is the opinion and estimate of the consultant that the replacement portion of the study will involve at least 90% of the work and any expansion portion of the study will not involve more than 10% of the work. 3. No funds are currently budgeted for this project. Potential Expenditures a. Feasibility Study Cost b. Contingency Estimated Budget Potential Funding Sources, a. Macpherson Oil Company b. General Fund - Designation for Capital Improvements Fund Balance, (6-30-91) Amount Needed for Feasibility Expenditures Revised Balance, designation for capital improvements (6-30-91) Alternatives: Other alternatives available to the City Council are: $19,740 1,260 $21,000 $17,766 $39,907 21,000 $18,907 1. Decide which site to use without a feasibility study. This action is not recommended. 2. Add additional locations to the study. Four potential sites have already been deleted by Council action. Respectfully Submitted: G%;2t.7-1 ynn A. Terry A ony Antich Deputy City Engineer Concur: Noted for Fiscal Impact: °2414311W Viki Copeland Finance Director Director of Pubic Works evin B. Northc--aft City Manager SEE ATTACHED CITY MANAGER COMMENT cc: Don Macpherson, Macpherson Oil Company ty/pwyr CITY MANAGER COMMENT: This project has not advanced significantly since January, 1990, when it was first recommended. While it cannot in all likelihood move forward now, the staff recommendation will place it in a status to advance quickly if and when an agree- ment is reached with the oil operator. SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION PUBLIC WORKS YARD RELOCATION CIP 91-608 No. Consultant Time Cost 1. BSI Consultants, Inc. 12 weeks $14,155 2. Anthony and Langford 11 weeks $19,740 3. Joncich, Sturm & Associates 9 weeks $19,892 4. Zimmerman Consulting Engineers 12 weeks $28,300 5. BOA Architecture and Interiors Plsnning 18 weeks $37,175 6. Albert C. Martin & Associates 8 weeks $52,055 7. BAS Bryan A. Stirrat & Asso- ciates 18 weeks $61,700 ty/ltcyr ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING SCOPE OF SERVICES Hermosa Beach Public Works Yard Relocation Preliminary Site Investigation August 22, 1990 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City rill be investigating the relocation of the Public Works Yard to two potential locations: 1. Adjacent to the Community Center; south of Pier Avenue and east of Ardmore Avenue; 2. South School property; between Valley Drive and Monterey Boulevard and between 6th Street and 2nd Street. The architectural and engineering services shall include the submission of a preliminary site investigation study including preliminary layouts at each potential site. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services shall include, but not be limited to, the fol lowing tasks: 1 . Determine Public Works yard facility needs by visiting the existing facility, and through discussions with key public works administration and operations staff regarding existing and planned programs, expansions, and unmet needs at the existing facility, etc. 2. Develop in broad terms, by function, the facilities required at the new Public Works yard and review with staff. 3. Visit the two (2) candidate sites and prepare preliminary plans and layouts, etc., of the required facilities at each potential location. 4. Develop prel im 1 nary cost data, by function, for site development, buildings, and major equipment at each potential location. The cost estimates will be separated into replacement costs and expansion costs categories. 5. Develop a preliminary time schedule for the relocation of the facilities. SCOPE OF SERVICES - Continued 6. Review operational and construction issues at each potential site, and list the advantages and disadvantages that exist. 7. Develop a plan for the removal or demolition of facilities at the existing public works yard site, and any cleanup or restoration required, excluding soil contamination. 8. Review findings with city staff. 9. Prepare 15 copies of the architectural report containing the reduced scale exhibits of preliminary layouts and other findings of the study, bound in 8-1/2 x 11 format. 10. Present the report at a City Council meeting. 11. Exhibits: Prepare rendered site plan and schematic floor plans for presentation use. Services Not Included This proposal does not include any so i I s investigation, site surveys or measurements, utility investigations, or other services to determine existing site conditions. It is expected that the City wi 1 I supply al 1 necessary site information. If surveys or field measurements are required, they will be charged as an additional service in accordance with our Standard Hourly Rates. PROGRAM ACTIVITY DIAGRAM PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION HERMOSA BEACH PUBLIC WORKS YARD RELOCATION WEEKS CITY ACTIONS MILESTONES PROJECT TASKS PROGRAMMING ®12 • SUPPLY EXISTING DATA BASE * KICKOFF MEETING SCHEMATIC DESIGN 4 5 6 ANTHONY AND LANGFORD/ARCHITECTS AIA FINAL COUNCIL PRESENTATION REPORT 7 O8 9 10 11 • APPROVE • EVALUATE PROGRAM ALTERNATIVES * PRESENT PROGRAM o ASSESS EXISTING CONDITIONS • COLLECT EXISTING DATA o ASSESS NEEDS AND SPACE REQUIREMENTS o PREPARE NEEDS ASSESSMENT o DIAGRAM SITE OPTIONS AND CONDITIONS o PREPARE SITE STUDIES o EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES o DEVELOP SCHEMATIC SITE PLANS o DEVELOP STATMENT OF PROBABLE COST o DEVELOP DEMOLITION PLAN FOR EXISTING FACILITIES NOT TO BE RELOCATED THIS SCHEDULE IS PREUMINARY AND WILL BE REFINED AS THE WORK PROGRESSES. • APPROVE SCHEMATIC PLANS * PRESENT SITE PLANS ° COMPLETE NARRATIVE AND EXHIBITS ° PROVIDE 15 COPIES OF FINAL REPORT * PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR CONVENIENCE Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council September 18, 1990 City Council meeting of September 25, 1990 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR A CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to distribute the attached RFP. BACKGROUND At an August 14, 1990 public hearing on recycling alternatives, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Request for Proposals for a Curbside Recycling Program. The options presented to the City Council at the August 14, 1990 meeting were to negotiate with the current refuse contractor or solicit proposals from anyone capable of providing the service. The City Council chose the latter option. The City Council also indicated several criteria to be included in a recycling program. ANALYSIS It is staffs suggestion that it would be beneficial to solicit proposals without specific criteria; however request that the respondent address the issues raised by the City Council. In this manner, we will receive additional information on the criteria desirable to include in a recycling program from those companies with considerable experience in operating curbside recycling programs. Specifying criteria in advance could act to stifle creativity in the respondents proposals. Staff did consult with the City Attorney regarding any conflict with the current refuse contract and curbside recycling. He did not feel that the current refuse contract would be negatively impacted by a curbside recycling program. Following initial review of the proposals and interviews,if necessary, staff will solicit input from those residents who have expressed an interest in curbside recycling on the merits of the proposals. ALTERNATIVES Amend the RFP as desired. Concur: Respect, ully submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety Kevin B. Nort cra t City Manager 1 0 September 25, 1990 Proposing Company Recycling Division Street address City, State, Zip Code REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The City of Hermosa Beach is accepting proposals for a City-wide Curbside Recycling Program. It is requested that your company submit a proposal explaining the type of service it would be able to provide to the City of Hermosa Beach. Proposals must be labeled "Curbside Recycling Proposal for the City of Hermosa Beach" and submitted by 2:00 P.M. on Thursday, November 15, 1990. Three (3) copies of the proposal must be submitted to: City Clerks Office Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 The City Council hopes that this request for proposals will stimulate some creative ideas for curbside recycling programs. The City hopes to receive comprehensive proposals that will address all aspects of curbside recycling, including, but not limited to funding methods, advertising, incentives for community participation, cost effectiveness, accounting procedures, term of commitment and risk management. Presently, the City requires its maintenance and service contractors to secure general liability insurance, naming the city as an additional insured, in the amount of $1,000,000. A curbside recycling program should be implemented by a contractor who has a proven record of success in curbside recycling and is able to stimulate the community to participate in the program. The proposal should include the resondents experience and references. A curbside recycling program should facilitate recycling by making it easy for people to place recyclable items into the recycling stream. The proposals will be evaluated, in part, in terms of how each one addresses and makes recommendations concerning the following issues: 1) Recommendations should be made as to what should be done with the redemption money received from recycling. Should it be used to offset the cost of recycling or returned to the city to designate a specific use for the funds, and why? The initial view of the City Council is that redemption money should return to the city. 1 2) Recommendations should be made as to who should be included in the curbside recycling program. Hermosa Beach has 7,210 refuse accounts served by individual cans, 270 multi -family accounts served by bins and 287 commercial/industrial accounts. 3) Recommendations should be made as to how refuse accounts not served by curbside recycling may be provided with recycling capabilities. The City Council has expressed a desire to pursue recycling capabilities for multi -family and commercial accounts as soon as possible. 4) Recommendations should be made as to how the curbside recycling program should be funded. The initial view of the City Council is that residents should pay for the program via a surcharge on the monthly refuse bill. Currently refuse charges are billed directly to users by the City's refuse contractor, Browning-Ferris Industries. BFI services all residential and commercial accounts. 5) Recommendations should be made as to what ways the community could be involved with a curbside recycling program. 6) Recommendations should be made as to how frequently curbside recycling should occur. Should it be offered on the same day as regular refuse is picked up or should it be bi-weekly or monthly in order to reduce the collection costs. 7) Recommendations should be made as to what types of items should be included in the recycling program and what degree of separation should be required of participants. The following items should be considered: Newspaper, glass, aluminum cans, metal cans, PET/HDPE plastics, glossy paper and telephone books. Separation could be by residents (separate bins), by pickup personnel (segregated trucks) or by a recycling facility (all materials commingled in one truck). 8 Recommendations should be made as to what measures should be taken to contend with the problem of scavengers. The municipal code presently allows scavenging, however this may be inconsistent with a curbside recycling program. The City Council has expressed a reluctance in the past to eliminating scavenging since it represents the means of livlihood for some lower income citizens. 9) Recommendations should be made as to how recycling could be incorporated into special events such as our bi-annual Fiesta. De Las Artes, beach volleyball tournaments, etc. Following initial review of the proposals, an interview may be requested with respondents to clarify terms of their proposal. The City of Hermosa Beach looks forward to receiving your proposal by 2:00 P.M. on Thursday,. November 15, 1990 and hopes that it will contain the necessary ingredients to make curbside - 2 recycling a success in our community. If you have any questions regarding the request for proposal, please contact me at (213)318-0235. Yours truly, William Grove Director of Building & Safety - 3 (q) Recommendation re. review of Cable Company ascertain- ment. Memorandum from Acting General Services Direct Henry L. Staten dated August 6, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar • Coun- cilmember Sheldon for separate discussion lat in the eting. Acti To approve the staff recommen•.tion that the Public.ccess Ascertainment, as submit d by MultiVision Cable T , be evaluated by Communic ions Support Cor- poration a a cost not to exceed $ ,000. Motion Shel.'n, second Esserti So ordered, noting the objections •f Midstokke an• Mayor Creighton. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1041 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HERMO- SA BEACH. ZONING OR NAP' E TO REQUIRE AMORTIZATION OF BUSINESSES THAT : QUIRE NDITIONAL USE PERMITS THAT CURRENTLY OPERA : WITHOUT A ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL GATIVE. DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: o adopt Ordinance No. 90-10 Motio Essertier, second Mayor Creight. . So ordered. 3. I MS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ISCUSSION. Items (f), (p) and (q) were discussed at this me but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. CURBSIDE RECYCLING ALTERNATIVES. Memorandum from Build- ing and Safety Director William Grove dated -August 6, 1990. Supplemental letter dated August 9, 1990 from Ron Felsing, 249 - 27th Street. Director Grove presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened. Coming forward to address the Council were: Eleanor Harvey - 2432 Park Avenue, opposed to an extra fee since she already recycles Ted Garvish - 1862 Hermosa Ave., favored a surcharge for those who did not recycle and a savings for those who did Dennis Cleland - 434 Twenty -Eighth Street, favored recycling Page 4 Minutes 08-14-90 David Scott - 123 Thirty -Fourth Street, favored recycling even at an extra charge Jackie Godokiss - 224 Prospect, favored recycling, suggested starting with three containers Greg McConnel - Hermosa Beach, favored recycling Lisa Rider - 1940 Monterey, favored recycling Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, opposed to an additional charge Merna Marshall - 360 Thirty -Third Place, favored recycling Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, favored recycling but wanted more options than B.F.I. The public hearing was closed. The Council asked the representa- tive from Browning-Ferris Industries to step to the podium. Edward King - 2017 Dufour, Redondo Beach, the regional manager of B.F.I. responded to Council questions Action: To direct staff to prepare a Request for Pro- posals (RFP) for providing a curbside recycling program, following review of the current refuse contract by the City Attorney, for a voluntary program consisting of a single container for combined recyclables, with a manda- tory monthly surcharge for all residences. Motion Sheldon, second Mayor Creighton. Amendment to the Motion: To amend the Motion so that all revenue would accrue to the City, and the City would deal with the scavenger problem. Proposed by Essertier, accepted by the maker and second. Further Amendment to the Motion: To amend the motion to include instructions for the City to move rapidly to expand the program to large multi -family residential and commercial, and, to involve the members of the public, who have volunteered their time, in the process. Proposed by Midstokke, accepted by the maker and second. Proposed Substitute Action: To approve the original motion, as amended, with the exception of three con- tainers for separated recyclables instead of one com- bined container. Motion Wiemans, died for lack of a second. The original motion as amended was so ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. The Meeting recessed at 9:10 P.M. The Meeting reconvened at 9:22 P.M. Item No. 7 was heard at this time but is listed in order for clarity. Page 5 Minutes 08-14-90 September 17, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 25, 1990 REQUEST FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR SANITARY SEWER RECONSTRUCTION ON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CIP 88-406 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council authorize staff to advertise for construction bids for the Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction Project known as CIP 88-406 and issue addenda as necessary. Background: At the June 14, 1990 meeting, City Council approved a five year Capital Improvement Program, which includes the subject project. The project represents the City's largest expenditure for sanitary sewer replacement in recent years and is consistent with City Council's goal to improve the City infrastructure. The planned expenditure of approximately $2 million dollars will complete all deficiencies, identified as high priority in the 1984 Santini and Thompson report. This project will also make permanent repairs to the 3 unexpected sewer collapses that occurred during the last 14 months. This $2 million expenditure will expend most of the sewer funds monies accumulated in the City treasury. Analysis: Plans and Specifications and detailed cost estimates have been completed by Harris & Associates, Consulting Engineers, and are available for review in the office of the City Clerk. The project provides for reconstruction of 13,670 lineal feet of existing deteriorated sewer main at various locations. The engineer's estimate of construction cost is between $1.8 and $2.2 million. 112 Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Drop this project. 2. Modify the project scope. Respectfully submitted, (/ Anihbny Ahtich Director of Public Works pworks/srcip406 Concur: "Kevin NorthcraOt City Manager CITY DE HERMOSA BEACH SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CIP 88-406 PROJECT LOCATION MAP wit/ NINT ST. a Sr �I 1L MYRTLE A_ 101 111111111.11 all111111a, "I OP 3_�_= _ _ _ Z. ., 111111MEM ,1 ��� l 1I' ' .., 30 C_4 SECOND ST. nal rIRST Sr. EXHIBIT A CIP 88-406 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, TARGET AREA 4 EXPENDITURES PROJECT ELEMENTS EXPENDED PRIOR TO FY89-90 REVISED BUDGET FY89-90 EXPENDED THRU 2/28/90 FINAL EXPENDED 6/30/90 FINAL BALANCE 6/30/90 BUDGET FY90-91 BUDGET FY91-92 ESTIMATED FUTURE NEEDS ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 16,800 892 119,233 892 0 0 1,615,821 FY 89-90 17,692 PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES 30,875 75,488 8/14/90 73,168 2,320 119,233 0 104,043 CONSTRUCTION 0 39,233 TOTAL FUNDING 44,831 (5,598) 1,603,000 $119,233 SO $1,920,163 SO 1,647,831 INSPECTION SO $2,096,562 TOTAL UNFUNDED 0 157,000 157,000 OTHER DIRECT COSTS 9,491 342 (342) 9,833 SUBTOTAL 57,166 115,613 0 119,233 (3,620) 1,760,000 0 0 0 0 1,936,399 CONTINGENCY 3,620 3,620 160,163 160,163 TOTAL EXPENDITURE $57,166 $119,233 SO $119,233 SO $1,920,163 SO SO SO SO $2,096,562 FUNDING SOURCES 127 6% UUT FUND INITIAL MIDYEAR 0 304,342 BUDGET APPROP. 304,342 160 SEWER FUND 57,166 119,233 ' 119,233 0 1,615,821 FY 89-90 160 SEWER FUND 1,792,220 80,000 39,233 8/14/90 119,233 0 0 0 TOTAL FUNDING $57,166 $119,233 SO $119,233 SO $1,920,163 SO SO SO SO $2,096,562 TOTAL UNFUNDED CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS OCCURRING AFTER 7/1/90 NOTE: THE $44,831 UNDER CONSTRUCTION WAS EXPENDED FOR EMERGENCY REPLACEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER ON MYRTLE AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET. THIS REPLACEMENT HAD BEEN SCHEDULED FOR FY 90-91. INITIAL MIDYEAR REVISED BUDGET APPROP. DATE REVISION DATE BUDGET FUNDING SOURCES ' FY 89-90 FY 89-90 160 SEWER FUND 80,000 39,233 8/14/90 119,233 0 TOTAL $80,000 $39,233 SO $119,233 NOTE: THE $44,831 UNDER CONSTRUCTION WAS EXPENDED FOR EMERGENCY REPLACEMENT OF SANITARY SEWER ON MYRTLE AVENUE BETWEEN 24TH STREET AND 25TH STREET. THIS REPLACEMENT HAD BEEN SCHEDULED FOR FY 90-91. September 17, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 25, 1990 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR INSPECTION AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR CIP 88-406 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council authorize staff to advertise a Request for Proposals for inspection and contract administration services for Capital Improvement Project CIP 88-406 and issue Addenda as necessary. Background: At the June 14, 1990 meeting, City Council approved the five year Capital Improvement Program. Under a separate Agenda item, Council will consider authorizing staff to advertise for Construction Bids for Capital Improvement Project 88-406, the project is to reconstruct over 13,600 lineal feet of sanitary sewer line. This item would provide for selecting a consultant for contract administration and inspection of this project. Analysis: Inspection services by a consultant are necessary because: 1) This $2 million project requires full time inspection. 2) City does not, at this time, have qualified inspection expertise at the level of an outside consultant. 3) Full time inspection would have a severe negative impact in completing the other CIP projects. A Request for Proposal has been prepared to solicit professional engineering services related to contract administration and inspection of Capital Improvement Project 88-406. Detailed descriptions of the scope of services and a brief description of the project are contained in the Request for Proposal which'is available for review in the office of the City Clerk. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Drop this project: 88-406). (including the construction of CIP Concur: 2. Modify the scope of work. Respectfully submitted, h'ony Antich Director of Publ c Works pworks/bid406 evin Northcr'af't City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTANT INSPECTION SERVICES CIP 88-406 GENERAL The City of Hermosa Beach requests proposal for Consultant Services consisting generally of Contract Administration and Construction Inspection for the Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction project described below. SUBMITTAL OF PROPOSALS Interested consultants are invited to submit proposals. In order to be considered, proposals must be submitted to the City of Hermosa Beach, Public Works Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Room 101, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, no later than 11:00 a.m., , 1990. Proposals are to be submitted in a sealed envelope marked: Proposal for Inspection Services Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction CIP 88-406 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project, entitled Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction, Capital Improvement Project 88-406, consists of reconstructing approximately 13,660 lineal feet of existing sanitary sewer main. All work is within existing rights-of-way or easements within the City of Hermosa Beach. Construction bids for the project will be received and opened on , 1990. The Engineer's construction estimate is $2,087,500. The contract will provide for completion within 200 calendar days from the date of the Notice to Proceed. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Plans and Specifications have been completed by Harris & Associates, Consulting Engineers, 4281 Katella Avenue, Suite 207, Los Angeles, CA 90720. The Plans and Specifications may be examined and reviewed, free of cost, at the public counter of the Public Works Department, 1315 Valley Drive, Room 101, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, Phone (213) 318-0214. The Plans and Specifications may be purchased from the City at the above location for a nonrefundable charge of $40.00. SCOPE OF SERVICES Contract Administration and Inspection Services shall include, but not be limited to, the following minimum tasks: 1. Provide overall Contract Administration to insure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and with the Plans and Specifications. Maintain all records including written documents, photographs, and other material pertaining to the project construction and administration. All such records shall become the property of the City. 2. Provide full-time construction inspection. 3. Provide supervision and support necessary to supplement field inspection and administration of the contract. 4. Review, process, and act upon all submittals of shop drawings, traffic control plans, schedules, certifications and substitution requests, assuring conformity with the contract documents and intended function. Where variations from requirements of the contract documents are proposed, approval of the Design Engineer and the City shall be obtained. 5. Assure compliance of materials, and fabricated or manufactured items. 6. Maintain an up-to-date and accurate record of "as built" conditions, Furnish and deliver as complete set of. "as built" prints upon completion of the contract. 7. Monitor progress of the work and prepare, for processing, monthly progress estimates and provide certifications for progress payments and final payment. 8. Conduct meetings and negotiations with Contractor as necessary, to resolve performance issues and to recommend on changes in the extent or amount of the contract, additions, deletions, or modifications of the approved design. Prepare and process all change orders. 9. Process as necessary, and act on clarification requests of Contractor. 10. Review all construction staking and cut sheets as provided by Contractor. Monitor Contractor's grade setting and spot check grades during pipe laying operations. 11. Provide maximum density and compaction testing as necessary to assure compliance with backfill and compaction specifications. CONTENT OF PROPOSAL Proposals may be prepared in a format of the Consultant's choosing, but should include the following as a minimum: 1. Statement of Qualifications o A brief Statement of Qualifications including a summary of previous experience with similar projects. o Proposed key personnel who would be assigned to the project, including resumes. 2. Statement of Approach o Description of the proposed approach to the project including management systems, records handling, and manpower allocations. 3. Cost of Services The Consultant Contract will be on an "hourly rate, cost not to exceed" basis. The proposal must contain the following information: o Detailed rate schedule for all personnel and/or services proposed. o A breakdown of costs for all basic services assuming 140 working days offull-time inspection. (Itemize total hours, hourly rate, and extended "not to -exceed" costs for each category.) a. Project Inspector. (Allow a minimum of 8 hrs, per day for 140 working days.) b. Supervision/Administration. (Indicate the number of hours and hourly rate for each category of personnel assigned to supplement project inspector to satisfy the complete scope of work. Include a net "not to exceed" cost.) c. Soils - Material Testing (Indicate type of test, estimated number of tests, and unit cost for each type.) Testing costs will not be included in the "not toexceed" amounts:' 3 SELECTION PROCESS Consultant selection will be based upon the following criteria: o The Firm's experience in providing comparable services for projects of similar complexity together with the proposed approach to the project: 0 - 35%. o Experience of assigned personnel in inspection and contract administration on projects of a similar complexity: 0 - 35%. o Analysis of cost for proposed services: 0 - 30%. All interested parties are required to contact: Lynn Terry Public Works Department 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 318-0214 for complete particulars regarding this request for proposals. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works rfp406 4 September 20, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 25, 1990 RECOMMENDATION RE. TOXIC SURVEY CONSULTANT FOR PROSPECT HEIGHTS SURPLUS LOTS Recommendation Staff recommendation on this item will be made at the City Coun- cil meeting, as research is continuing. Background At the City Council meeting September 11, 1990, the Council di- rected that proposals be obtained for a hazardous waste survey at the site of the Prospects Heights surplus lots, which are being purchased from School District. Council directed that this mat- ter be placed on the September 25 agenda for further consider- ation by the Council prior to authorizing the work. Analysis: In the week and a half since the Council's direction, staff has been able to obtain a list of possible proposers, and a sample RFP. Since an express concern of Councilmembers was the amount of possible cost in relationship to the low perception of toxics existing on the site, staff has been reviewing the work that could be done by City staff. It appears our staff can review the history of the site and make soil samples below the organic level of the earth on the site. Additional information is being obtained from possible vendors and those knowledgeable in real estate matters, and a recommenda- tion on how to proceed will be available by the Council meeting of September 25. Also, the School District has suggested that the hazardous survey be conducted simultaneously on the South School site, in an- ticipation that we will be entering escrow with the District for the purchase of that site as well. Since the District has not yet approved the acquisition agreement for Prospect Heights, es- crow has not opened. Accordingly, the City has additional time to consider the appropriate way to conduct a hazardous survey on both Prospect Heights and South School. evin B. Northc-aft City Manager cc: Public Works City Attorney 12 7, September 12, 1990 City Council Meeting September 25, 1990 Mayor and Members of the City Council CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION - AUGUST 1990 Attached is the list of delegates to the various committees as recommended by the Mayor and approved by Council at the meeting of September 11, 1990. Recommendation Adopt the attached Resolution reflecting the above action re- appointing Councilmember Creighton delegate and Mayor Sheldon alternate to the City Selection Committee of the Southern Cal- ifornia Rapid Transit District, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 10 of the Public Utilities Code. The previously adopted resolutions for the Independent Cities Association (No. 89-5336) and for the Independent Cities Risk Management Association (No. 87-5095) remain in force. Respectfully submitted) Elaine Doerfling, City erk Concu : ■�' 0442 evin B. Northc'aft, City Manager - 1 - 1 6 t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A MEMBER OF SAID COUNCIL OF SAID CITY TO THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO PART 3 OF DIVISION 10 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the Southern California Rapid Transit District Law, being Part 3 of Division 10 of the Public Utilities Code of the State of California, the City Council does hereby appoint the following member of said Council as a member to the City Selection Committee: Delegate: Alternate: SECTION 2. Councilmember Creighton Mayor Sheldon That the within resolution shall become operative and the appointment made by Section 1 hereof shall be effective as of September 25, 1990. SECTION 3. That immediately after the effective date of the appointment hereby made, the City Clerk shall without delay forward a copy of this resolution, together with notice of the appointment made hereby, to the Secretary of the Southern Calif- ornia Rapid Transit District. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution; shall cause the action of the City Council in adopting same to be entered in the official minutes of said City Council; and shall retain this resolution, duly signed by the proper City officials in the official records of the City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION OF DELEGATES, ALTERNATE APPOINTMENTS AND/OR RE -APPOINTMENT Beach Cities Coalition for Drug Free Youth Delegate Essertier Beach Cities Committee Delegate Sheldon Delegate Midstokke Commuter Transportation Implementation Plan Steering Committee Delegate Creighton Alternate Essertier Coordinating Council Delegate Sheldon Independent Cities Association Delegate Midstokke Alternate Wiemans Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority Delegate Midstokke Resolution No. 89-5336 Alternate Copeland Independent Cities Risk Management Association Delegate Sheldon Resolution No. 87-5095 Alternate Blackwood Inglewood Fire Training Authority Commission (same as South Bay Sanitation District) Delegate Sheldon Alternate Midstokke League of California Cities - Board of Directors Delegate Sheldon Alternate Essertier Page 1 Appointments 09-12-90 Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee (must appoint alter- nate separately each time when unable to attend called meeting) Mayor Sheldon Sister City Association, Inc. Delegate Essertier Alternate Creighton South Bay Cities Association Delegate Essertier Alternate Wiemans South Bay Cities Sanitation District (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles) (Same as Inglewood Fire Training Authority) Delegate Sheldon Alternate Midstokke South Bay Corridor Study Steering Committee Delegate Essertier Alternate Wiemans South Bay Juvenile Diversion Project Delegate Sheldon Alternate Creighton Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Delegate Midstokke Alternate Sheldon Southern California Rapid Transit District Delegate Creighton Resolution No. 90-50, Alternate Sheldon West Basin Water Association Delegate Wiemans Page 2 Appointments 09-12-90 SUB -COMMITTEES City/School Relations Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Creighton Councilmember Sheldon Oil Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Essertier Councilmember Wiemans City Manager Compensation Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Sheldon Councilmember Wiemans City Manager Review System Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Midstokke Councilmember Essertier Data Processing Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Sheldon Councilmember Essertier Page 3 Appointments 09-12-90 September 17, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 25, 1990 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - AUGUST 1990 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and management of capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Type Current Month Last FY To Date This Month FY Last FY To Date Sewer Demolition Sewer Lateral Street Excavation Utility Co's only Dumpster/Strand Banner Permits 2 0 6 0 1 1 5 37 55 2 21 18 10 96 119 O 324 274 1 21 32 O 18 16 ENGINEERING The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 85-137 CIP 89-141 CIP 89-142 CIP 89-146 CIP 89-148 CIP 89-150 CIP 89-406 FAU, Asphaltic Over- lay, Valley, Ardmore & Prospect Pavement Mgmt. Report Sidewalk Repair Street Median Up- grade Trash Enclosures Misc. Traf. Sig. Imp. Sewer Rehab/Area 4 CIP 88-506 CIP 89-512 CIP 89-516 CIP 89-517 CIP 89-518 CIP 89-601 CIP 89-604 CIP 89-608 CIP 89-615 MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public Works divided into the following sections: - Parks/Medians - Street Maintenance/Sanitation' - Sewers/Storm Drains - Street Lighting Various Park Imp. Basketball Courts 6th St. & Prospect Park Recreational Fac. Recreational Fac. Fuel Tanks Var. Bldg. Imp. Public Works Yard Comm. Cen. Fire Alarm System Department is - Traffic Safety - Building Maintenance - Equipment Service Parks Division/Medians: Repaired 10th Street swings with chains and "S" hooks. Repaired irrigation city-wide. Repaired Hermosa Avenue planter boxes. Sandblasted & repainted play equipment at Valley Park, 19th Street Park and Prospect Park. Street Maintenance/Sanitation: Removal of graffiti city-wide. Street patching city-wide. Scrubbed downtown sidewalk area. Worked on sewer main repairs at 9th Court & Beach Drive. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Repaired sewer main at 9th Street & Beach Drive. Rodded sewer mains city-wide. Cleaned storm drains inlets in downtown area. Closed off drain inlets except for nuisance water in downtown area to eliminate odor. Street Lighting: Repaired stair lighting at pier head. Installed new light fixtures for 2nd floor City Hall. Installed and removed banners city-wide. Began replacement of Strand lighting control boxes with new Meyers cans at 11th Street and 14th Street. Traffic Safety Division: Painted block walls around city parking lot at City Hall and Valley Drive. Graffiti removal city-wide. Painted arrows on Strand walk going north & south. Installed regulatory signs city-wide. Building Maintenance Division: On-going removal of graffiti from Valley Park, Clark Stadium and fishing pier restrooms. Painted maroon trim on outside of Community Center. Painted sign at Community Center entrance. Started work on new hand rails around Community Center. Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment. Res - tfull submitte An'h•ny Antich Director of Publi. Works mon2/pwadmin :mv Noted: �/ (evin B. Northc'aft City Manager f September 13, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council September 25, 1990 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AUGUST, 1990 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of August. RECREATION PROGRAMMING • August 10 - The summer park program "Beach Summer Blast II", concluded with an excursion to the Comedy and Magic Club. The children enjoyed the entertainment of a magician and all received a prize. The total enrollment for the program was 164, this is an increase of 28% from last year's enrollment. ▪ August 17 - The 1990 summer recreation classes ended their 8 week duration and set a new Hermosa record for the amount of classes offered and participants enrolled. Thirty classes were offered and a total of 409 people participated. • August 21 - The employee recreation Lawn Bowling Tournament concluded with a luncheon recognizing the tournament champions "No Plans" from the Planning Department and the Lawn Bowling Club (who were very instrumental in allowing for the tournament to occur). SPECIAL EVENTS August 3, 4, and 5 - The International Surf Festival celebrated its 28th year with Hermosa Beach hosting the Fishing Derby. Twelve year old Leo Godinez won the award for the largest fish caught by landing a 31 1/2" barracuda. Hermosa Beach also served as the starting point for the Dwight Crum Pier to Pier Swim and was the location for the Lifeguard dory races. •Committee Members deemed this year's festival the smoothest running to date. • August 25-26 - The Association of Volleyball Professionals (AVP) hosted the Men's Professional Championship Volleyball tournament in Hermosa Beach. This year's event proved to have the largest attendance ever estimated at 10,000 people per day. There were virtually no operational problems throughout the entire event. The tournament was well organized and executed with no evidence of alcohol ordinance violations or crowd control problems. Kudos to the Hermosa Beach police Department for the excellent job they did in monitoring the event. Fees collected by the City totaled $15,905. Community Resources collected $6,280.00 in permit fees the police Department collected $9,625.00 in security fees. COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION August 18 - The Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation sponsored the first ever 60's "Right On" Fundraiser Dance and Auction from 7:00 PM - 12:00 AM. The evening included a live and silent auction, games, dancing, food and contests. The event proved to be a true success in all respects approximately $12,000 was raised. The monies will go toward carpet in the Community Center. FILM PERMITS There were a total of three (3) filming permits processed in the month of August. The City took in a total of $1,700 in processing and location fees. MISCELLANEOUS August 16 - Final arrangements were made for the Hermosa Beach Fall/Winter Recreation Brochure/City Newsletter. The brochure is scheduled to be mailed in late September and promises to be full of new and exciting events. FACILITY RESERVATIONS There are currently 39 facility users. In August the department processed 16 facility reservations. Facility User Hours Field 0 Theatre 64 Clark 215 Gym 147 Room 4 34 Room 7 14 Room 8 68 Room 10 57 Room 12 81 DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This Month FY Last Fy Month Last Fy To Date To Date $22,322.29 $24,612.75 $ 47,529.59 $ 55,659.50 Revenue Projection: $289,800 Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 16 % of the fiscal year is $47,529.59 or 16% of the projected figure. Respectfully submitted, Carol Belser Recreation Specialist Dept. of Community Resources Noted: Mary . 'ooney Dir=etor Dep . of Community Resources Kevin B. Northcrafft City Manager Honorable Mayor and September 18, 1990 Members of the City Council ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY AUGUST, 1990 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department ac- tivity for the month of August. Overall permit activity increased in August as the department issued 91 permits of which 41 were building permits. Six permits were issued for single family dwellings, two permits were issued for two unit structures and one permit was issued for a three unit structure. Eighteen permits were issued for alterations or additions to existing dwellings. Five dwelling units were de- molished resulting in a net increase of eight dwelling units to the housing inventory. Building Department general fund revenue for 16.6% of the fiscal year is $64,677.44 or 17.8% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. Total revenue for all funds is $140,024.86. The Business License division reports that 212 licenses were is- sued during August resulting in revenue of $30,718.00. Business License revenue represents 20.5% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. The department logged 31 new code enforcement complaints during August, of which four were for illegal dwelling units. The department closed nine cases in August and currently has twenty- four illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation. Noted: Kevin B. Noirthcraft City Manager Respectfully Submitted, William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month of AUGUST 1990 NUMBER OF CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY PERMITS LAST FY DATE TO DATE Building 41 41 66 65 Plumbing 36 34 50 54 Electric 14 22 27 51 Plan Check 25 16 42 27 Sewer Use 3 4 4 6 Res. Bldg.Reports 19 26 29 52 Comm. Inspections 36 19 80 32 Parks & Recreation 0 3 0 5 In lieu Park & Rec. 4 1 5 2 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 1 Sign Review 5 6 13 7 Fire Flow Fees 11 13 16 18 TOTALS 194 185 332 320 FEES Building** 22,630.04 23,228.25 32,720.12 37,306.76 Plumbing 2,353.00 6,147.00 3,437.00 7,540.00 Electric 1,462.00 3,228.00 3,592.00 7,014.00 Plan Check 6,623.50 5,455.63 21,558.32 8,821.33 Sewer Use 1,649.64 2,614.17 1,992.18 3,299.25 Res. Bldg. Reports 720.00 1,040.00 1,120.00 2,120.00 Comm. Inspections 850.00 475.00 1,950.00 800.00 Parks & Recreation 0 32,670.00 0 45,738.00 In lieu Park & Rec. 34,320.00 6,534.00 42,900.00 13,068.00 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 75.00 Sign Review 125.00 150.00 300.00 175.00 Fire Flow Fees 23,588.24 25,911.00 30,455.24 33,020.00 TOTALS VALUATIONS 94,321.42 107,453.05 140,024.86 158,977.34 2,241,512 2,452,459 3,216,900 3,698,457 **Includes State Seismic Fee $236.23 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of AUGUST 1990 DWELLING UNITS TYPE OF STRUCTURE PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 6 6 1,113,375 2. Duplex Dwellings 1 2 302,328 3. Triplex Dwellings 1 3 405,000 4. Four Units or More 5. Condominiums 2 2 318,650 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 12. Swimming Pools 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 18 84,609 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 7 17,350 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs 1 200 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 18. Signs 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 5 21. All other permits not listed TOTAL PERMITS 41 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 2,241,512 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 13 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 5 NET CHANGE: +8 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 90/91 +65 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 10,144 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: William Grove, Building & Safety Director FROM: Sherria Lawrence, Business License Clerk RE: Monthly report for August 1990 DATE: September 18, 1990 CURRENT MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE $30,718.00 $36,809.89 $87,368.00 Business Licenses Renewed New licenses issued during August 1990 Out of City licenses Home Occupation license New business licenses issued New owners of existing business Total LAST FY TO DATE $68,212.79 125 56 16 13 2 87 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS of the HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL September 20, 1990 Regular Meeting of September 25, 1990 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT AUGUST, 1990 Staff reports were prepared for the following: 1. 2 Final Maps 2. 2 Text Amendments 3. 1 Sign Waiver Rescission 4. 2 Subdivisions 5. 2 Conditional Use Permits (Commercial) 6. 4 Conditional Use Permit Amendments 7. 3 Zone Changes 8. 3 Parking Plans 9. 2 Resolution of Intentions 10. 2 Zoning Ordinance Interpretations 11. 7 General Plan Amendments 12. 1 Planning Commission / Staff Workshop 13. 3 Absences on City Commission Memos The following activities were undertaken for transit projects: 1. Routine tasks. 2. Transportation Report to LACTC requesting approval of LAX commuter project 3. 4th Quarterly Report (FY 89-90) to LACTC. Meetings and seminars attended by the Planning Department Staff: 1. 22 meetings The following enforcement activities were conducted: 1. Total Inspections - 68 1st Time Inspections - 38 2nd Time Inspections - 30 Thank Your Letters - 30 Total Letters Out - 70 Memos Generated - 5 Budget Update: Ending 08/31/90, revenues were 25% below budget for 16% of FY 90-91. Ending 08/31/90, expenditures were 4.7% below budget for 16% of FY 90-91. 1 Transit Update: "WAVE" Dial -A -Ride Ridership: Last FY 08/90 08/89 FY to Date to Date Hermosa Beach Passengers 1,123 1,309 2,207 2,240 Redondo Beach Passengers 4,756 4,435 9,409 8,567 Satellite Passengers 362 287 664 663 Upcoming agenda items to City Council: 1. 3rd Quarter General Plan amendments: a) Parks and Recreation Element (continued from the 2nd Quarter General Plan amendment) b) Draft revision of Housing Element. c) Selected inconsistent areas east of Pacific Coast Highway. 2. Text amendment to allow outdoor display in commercial zones. 3. Text amendment to add motorcycle sales & parts sales or to eliminate motorcycle repair under commercial permitted use list. Michael Schubach Planning Director NOTED: evi B. Nort cr City Manager 2 Respectfully submitted, u-Ying Ti Administrative Aide September 18, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 25, 1990 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT AUGUST ACTIVITY REPORT Recruitment: During the month of August the Personnel Department: * Concluded testing for the position of Planning Aide * Initiated recruitment for the position of Senior Account Clerk * Concluded recruitment for the position of Sweeper Operator Civil Service Board: * The Civil Service Board accepted the Council's request to review the City's class specifications. The class spec. for Engineering Technician was approved and submitted to Council. Risk Management: * Liability Claims: Aug. claims opened Aug. claims closed Total claims open * Workers' Compensation Claims 3 Aug. claims opened : 1 3 Aug. claims closed : 3 28 Total claims open : 61 General Appropriations Secretary: The General Appropriations Secretary performs secretarial support services for all City Departments as well as directory assistance for incoming calls and processing the City's mail. The following summary indicates the amount of time spent on each of the assig- ned functions. June: 160 hours worked (20 hours vacation) Word Processing* 71% (113.00 hrs) Avg. 7.06 hrs/day Finance: 23% City Manager: 8% Planning: 12% Public Works: 29% Personnel: 26% City Treasurer: 2% Respectfully su obert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Mail Processing 14% (23.00 hrs) Avg. 1.44 hrs/day (26 .00 ( 9.00 (14.00 (33.00 (29.00 ( 2.00 hrs) hrs) hrs) hrs) hrs) hrs) Directory/Dept Support 15% (24.00 hrs) Avg. 1.50 hrs/day Noted: e, L.^S/ Kevin B. Northccaft City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council 1990 GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT AUGUST ACTIVITY REPORT Parking Cites Issued Vehicles Impounded/Booted Calls Responded To Booting Revenue Citations Issued Warnings Issued Complaints Responded To Total Number of Animals Picked -Up of which: Returned to Owner Taken to Shelter Injured, taken to Vet Deceased CONCUR: Cynthia Wilson General Services Director / r� '- % ✓, ' ,'‘'g Kevin B. Nbrtbcraft City Manager PARKING ENFORCEMENT Current This Month Month Last Year 9,202 53 181 $4,345 65 0 101 68 26 18 5 19 8,983 51 200 $5,168 ANIMAL CONTROL 37 0 62 85 26 28 7 24 September 18, 1990 City Council Meeting of September 25, Last Fiscal Year Fiscal Year To Date To Date 18,513 144 339 $8,222 110 0 174 137 58 34 6 40 18,219 83 401 $8,490 Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Wilson, Director by Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide 105 0 157 174 52 73 14 35 HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT 1990 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT AUGUST FIRE STATISTICS ~ This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year One Year Ago To Date Total Calls 70 50 560 534 False Alarms 9 4 56 36 Mutual Aid 0 1 12 4 Paramedic assists 31 25 275 268 Residence Fire 5 7 41 48 Commercial Fire 1 30 18 36 Vehicle Fire 1 2 13 17 Hazardous Mtls. 4 5 38 26 Other 19 3 107 99 PARAMEDIC STATISTICS Total Responses 88 72 702 685 No Patient/aid 6 7 66 52 Medical call 38 27 285 260 Trauma call 44 38 380 368 Mutual Aid 0 0 3 0 Auto Accident 19 8 128 125 Strand Accident 11 13 87 72 Assault 10 13 72 75 Jail call 7 9 38 67 Transports 45 32 352 333 Base Hosp. Con. 20 14 285 172 Trauma Center 0 1 12 6 INSPECTIONS and PREVENTION Commercial 109 187 504 724 Assembly 0 1 2 4 Apartments 43 106 325 388 Fumigations 10 17 105 127 Institutions 2 1 23 8 Industrial 0 0 10 5 / iia •:ctfully Su•' s.,_ it•=d Noted:/ =i_ % Steve S. Wisniewski, Kevin B. Northcraft, Cit Manager Director of Public Safety September 19, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 25, 1990 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, AUGUST 1990 - Coopers and Lybrand, our new auditors, began their field work August 20th. The field work will continue for four weeks. Departments have received draft user fee information from David M. Griffith and Associates and the cost allocation plan is currently being reviewed. Bank of America representatives met with Councilman Essertier, the City Treasurer, City Manager and Finance Director to review current bank services. Potential cost effective changes were discussed. STATISTICAL SECTION CURRENTMONTHI PMONTHUS [THIS LASTMONTH YEAR YEAR DATEO I LTOTDATYEAR R CITATION PAYMENTS 5,776 5,343 6,463 11,119 11,511 INVOICES 11 33 10 44 13 CASH RECEIPTS 1,781 1,933 1,453 3,714 2,639 WARRANTS 331 341 286 672 603 PURCHASE ORDERS 425 436 313 861 663 UUT EXEMPTIONS 654 652 602 FILED TO DATE PAYROLL FULL TIME 164 164 164 PART TIME 63 62 61 Noted: evin�B. Nor hcraft City Manager Viki Copeland Finance Director HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1990 OFFENSES This Month 1. AUGUST REPORTED Year to Date Last Year This Month One Year Ago To Date Murder 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 17 1 2 18 Rape Robbery Assault 11 19 74 104 Burglary 30 39 230 224 Larceny 41 49 346 277 Motor Vehicle Theft 9 11 85 86 DUI 39 16 283 176 2196 All Other Offenses 359 376 2570 Disturbance Calls 271 1378 " PERSONS ARRESTED Adults 119 85 945 695 Juveniles 0 0 0 0 Criminal Citations 178 150 1376 976 Bicycle/Skateboard Cites 14 49 87 191 TRAFFIC REPORT ACCIDENTS Fatal 0 0 0 1 Injury 10 7 72 100 Property Damage Only 36 23 165 175 CITATIONS Traffic 481 434 4254 3134 Parking 33 17 132 217 CALLS FOR SERVICE Total Calls 2813 2803 25655 19426 Noted: R- .. ctfully . u i milted evin B. Northcraft, •ity Manager Steve S. Wisniewski, I Director of Public Safety