The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09/11/90I September 4, Honorable Mayor and Members City Council of the Hermosa Beach City Council of September RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CHANGE IN STAFFING FOR CABLE TELEVISION COORDINATION 9-7/ - 1990 Meeting 11, 1990 Recommendation: That the City Council approve a change in authorized positions of the City by deleting one-half Technical Aide position in the General Services Department and adding one-half Cable Television Coordinator in the Community Resources Department, and reduce the salaries account in General Services by $9,700 while increasing the salary account in Community Resources by $9,700. Background: The coordination of the City's cable television franchise and governmental and public access efforts has been handled by our General Services Department, through the Administrative Aide to the Director. This assignment has not proven to be optimal, as the General Services Department does not have direct contact with public information programs. During the process of the review of our cable operation by a citizen's committee, the lack of ade- quate staffing was a repeated concern. The City's fifteen year franchise for cable television with MultiVision Cable expires on October 10, 1993. October 1, 1990 begins the renewal period during which public input is to be ob- tained and a new franchise negotiated with the cable operator. Analysis: Staff feels that reassigning the coordination of our cable tele- vision franchise to the Community Resources Department will result in more external contacts with the community and those involved and concerned about cable television. Community Resour- ces is actively involved in programming and public information matters, and their contacts in the community and filming industry make this reassignment a logical choice. The timing of the change in assignments appears especially ap- propriate, as both the General Services Department and Community Resources have new department directors. Also, the renewal pro- cess, which will be a major effort of the City, is just about to begin. Increased, pro -active staffing is appropriate at this time to assure the next renewal period offers our community the best available cable television system with the widest options. At the same time, relieving the Administrative Aide in General Services of this responsibility will allow that position to serve more directly the new General Services Director. - 1 - 1h 'The change in assignment will result in a reduction of a half- time Technical Aide position in the General Services Department, and creation of a half-time position in the Community Resources Department. It is hoped that by placing the responsibility for cable television as a sole responsibility in a half-time posi- tion, more time and effort can be devoted to the renewal and our increasingly active public access efforts. The duties of the deleted Technical Aide position will be shared by the others in the General Services Department. Further, the workload of that department should reduce considerably when we have installed the computerized ticket writers for automated data entry. While the transfer of salary monies is roughly the same, this is due to the difference in steps. The technical Aide was budgeted at the top step, and it was assumed that the Cable T.V. coordina- tor will be appointed at mid-range. Bevin B. Northcraft City Manager' cc: Community Resources General Services Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director CITY HALL OPERATING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY OPEN 7:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. CLOSED FRIDAYS Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. .CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led -by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 NOTE: There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers THE'HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager ap- pointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done." The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considsered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agen- das for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval re- quires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember can remove an item from this listing thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Cal- endar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law. The Hearings afford the public the opportunity to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Hearings Hearings are held on other matters of public importance for which there is no legal requirement to conduct an advertised Public Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least one week later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Regular ordinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by the Wednesday preceeding the Regular City Council meeting. Miscellaneous Items and Reports r.City Manager The City Manager coordinates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since. the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council Members of the City Council may place items on .the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. Oral Communications from the Public - Matters of an Urgency Nature Citizens wishing to address the City Council on an urgency matter not elsewhere con- sidered on the agenda may do so at this time. Parking Authority The Parking Authority is a financially separate entity, but is operated as an inte- gral part of the City government. Vehicle Parking District No. 1 The City Council also serves as the Vehicle Parking District Commission. It's pur- pose is to oversee the operation of certain downtown parking lots and otherwise pro- mote public parking in the central business district. . "Cooperation is doing with a smile what you have to do anyhow." -Unknown AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 11, 1990 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Chuck Sheldon MAYOR PRO TEM Kathleen Midstokke COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Robert Essertier Albert Wiemans Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. Complete agenda materials are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: Coastweeks, September 15 - October 8, 1990, and "Adopt -a -Beach" Coastal Cleanup Day Sept. 22, 1990 PRESENTATION ON LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE PROPOSED CLOSING - Scott Dannen, Mayor Pro Tem, City of El Segundo (Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft with resolution for adoption) CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the City Council on any items on the Consent Calendar may do so at this time. Citizens may request to speak during Public Hearings and items appearing under Municipal Matters at the time the item is called. Citizen comments on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction will be provided time at the end of the agenda. Please limit comments to three minutes. Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on August 28, 1990. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the August, 1990 monthly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated September 5, 1990. (e) (f) (g) (h) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #21305 for a two -unit condominium at 634 First Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 4, 1990. Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Easter Seals organization. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 30, 1990. Recommendation to accept as complete sidewalk repairs, CIP 89-142 and authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion. Memorandum from Public Works Direcator Anthony Antich dated September 4, 1990. Recommendation to approve change in staffing for Cable Television coordination. Memorandum from City.. Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 4, 1990. Recommendation to table indefinitely updated appraisal for South School. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 5, 1990. Recommendation to approve plans and specifications for Basketball Courts at Clark Field, CIP 89-512, and au- thorize staff to advertise for construction bids. Memo- randum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated September 4, 1990. (k) Fire Association MOU nel Director Robert 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. voN\v Memorandum from Person- ood dated (a) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1045 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 5- 9 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING BOATING. For adoption. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE REPLACEMENT OF AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION/SNACK SHOP WITH NEW GASOLINE PUMPS, A SNACK SHOP AND A SELF-SERVICE AUTOMATIC CAR WASH, with resolution for adoption. (Con- tinued from June 12, 1990 City Council meeting). Memo- randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 4, 1990. 6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO ALLOW CAR STEREO AND CAR ALARM INSTALLATION AS A PERMITTED USE ONLY IN THE C-3 ZONE SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND TO PROPOSE ADD- ING SAID USE TO THE C-3 PERMITTED USE LIST, with or- dinance for introduction. Memorandum from Planning Di- rector Michael Schubach dated September 4, 1990. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS FOR ACQUISITION OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS SURPLUS LOTS AND TOXIC SURVEY ANALYSIS. Memo- randum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated Sep- tember 5, 1990. 8. RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE ON CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 6, 1990. 9. RECOMMENDATION FOR UTILIZATION OF PROSPECT SCHOOL HOUSE. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 30, 1990. 10. HISTORICAL SOCIETY LEASE AGREEMENT. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 30, 1990. 11. RECOMMENDATION TO CALL FOR BIDS - FENCE REPAIRS AT COM- MUNITY CENTER AND CLARK FIELD, FY 1990-91 CIP 89-506. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated August 23, 1990. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Council committee assignments. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated August 29, 1990. (b) Appointment of Planning Commissioner to fill term expir- ing June 30, 1992. 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items not on the agenda but within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. ADJOURNMENT 4 September 5, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 11, 1990 PRESENTATION ON AIR FORCE BASE PROPOSED CLOSING The air force base, located in the City of El Segundo, is the target of possible closing by the federal government, with its operations to be moved to other states. Several public agencies have gone on record in opposition to this plan, principally due to its cost and its negative impact on the economy of the South Bay and Los Angeles County. The cities of El Segundo and Hawthorne, our Congressman Mel Le- vine, and the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors have all requested that all cities join them in appealing for the con- tinuation of the base at its current location. Mayor Sheldon requested that this item be set for presentation before the City Council at your meeting of September 11, 1990. Mayor Pro Tem Scott Dannen representing the, El Segundo City Coun- cil will be in attendance for a brief presentation. Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ld RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF _ , CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF RETAINING THE LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE/SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION AT ITS PRESENT LOCATION IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO WHEREAS, the Department of Defense is considering a proposal to the United States Congress to relocate and/or close some of its bases across the nation; and WHEREAS, one of these bases is the Los Angeles Air Force Base/Space Systems Division, which facility is located in the Los Angeles Basin, home of the nation's aerospace industry; and WHEREAS, there is under consideration the relocation of this base to other areas of the Western states, including Colorado Springs, Colorado; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Vandenburg Air Force Base, California; and Riverside, California; and WHEREAS, loss of this base would result in a very serious and adverse impact on the economy of this region, including the loss of over 7500 jobs; loss of an annual payroll of $310 million; loss of $362 million dollars per year in local goods and services; loss of almost $2 billion dollars in lost contracts to aerospace suppliers in the Los Angeles Basin; and WHEREAS, the loss of the aforesaid business would seriously decrease tax revenues necessary for the support of area public agencies; and WHEREAS, it would cost the government up to $1 billion to rebuild the existing educational and research and development facilities already in place. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of concludes that the retention of the Los Angeles Air Force Base at its presant location is in the economic and strategic interest of the nation's objectives in both space exploration and defense of our country, as well as the economic interest of the citizens and businesses of the area. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of on behalf of its citizens does hereby urge the Department of Defense and the United States Congress to retain the Los Angeles Air Force Base/Space Systems Division in the City of El Segundo. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 822 HALL OF ADMINISTRATION / LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 1 (213) 974-4444 FAX (213) 626-6941 DEANE DANA SUPERVISOR, FOURTH DISTRICT August 20, 1990 Mr. Kevin Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Kevin , MEMBERS OF -THE BOARD PETER F. SCHABARUM KENNETH HAHN EDMUND D. EDELMAN DEANE DANA MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH RECEIVED AUG 2 2199(1 I have enclosed a copy of the motion introduced by Supervisor Deane Dana and approved by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on August 14, 1990. The motion opposes the closing or relocation of the U.S. Air Force Station in El Segundo. I may be reached at 533-3015 if there are any questions. Sincerely DEANE DANA Supervisor, Fourth District County of Los Angeles LEAH J. JEFFRIES Senior Deputy LJJ:cgm Enclosure MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Larry J. Monteilh, Executive Officer Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 383 Hall of Administration Los Angeles, California 90012 At its meeting held August 14, 1990, the Board took the following action: 60 Supervisor Dana made the following statement: "The Defense Department is moving forward in examining the possibility of closing or relocating its El Segundo Air Force Base/Space Systems Division. Either action would create a serious economic setback for the El Segundo area and for the County as a whole. "The Air Force Base employs 3,200 military and civilian employees and the Aerospace Corporation has over 4,300 employees representing a combined payroll of $325 million annually. In addition, the two agencies have local goods and services contracts for over $362 million with a 'trickle down' effect nearly three times that amount. "To underscore the widescale impacts that would occur if the Federal government does opt to remove the facilities, the total value of contracts with area aerospace contractors such as TRW, Hughes, Rockwell and Wyle Labs is $6.5 billion." (Continued on Page 2) - 1 - Syn. 60 (Continued) Therefore, on motion of Supervisor Dana, seconded by Supervisor Hahn, unanimously carried (Supervisor Edelman being absent), the Executive Officer of the Board was instructed to take the following actions: 1. Prepare a five -signature letter informing the United States Department of Defense of the Board's unanimous opposition to any plan to either close or relocate the El Segundo Air Force Base/Space Systems Division, citing the full negative fiscal effects such actions would have on the aerospace industry in Southern California and on Los Angeles County in particular; and 2. Forward the same information to all members of the Los Angeles County and Southern California Congressional Delegation. 20814-9.com Copies distributed: Each Supervisor Chief Administrative Officer County Counsel Auditor -Controller Letters sent to: Secretary of Defense, United States Defense Department Each member, California Congressional Delegation 2 SYN. NO. MOTION BY SUPERVISOR DEANE DANA August 14, 1990 le 0 The Defense Department is moving forward in examining the possibility of closing or relocating its El Segundo Air Force Base/Space Systems Division. Either action would create a serious economic setback for the El Segundo area and for the County as a whole. The Air Force Base employees 3,200 military and civilian employees and the Aerospace Corporation has over 4,300 employees representing a combined payroll of $325 million annually. In addition, the two agencies have local goods and services contracts for over $362 million with a "trickle down" effect nearly three times To underscore federal government value of contracts that amount. the widescale impacts that would occur if the does opt to remove the facilities, the total with area aerospace contractors such as TRW, Hughes, Rockwell and Wyle Labs is.$6.5 billion. - M O R E - Hahn E 11nau Dana Antonovich Schabarum F6:2 I AUG 14 1990 MOTION -0/at 74- SYN. NO. MOTION BY SUPERVISOR DEANE DANA August 14, 1990 The Defense Department is moving forward in examining the possibility of closing or relocating its El Segundo Air Force Base/Space Systems Division. Either action would create a serious economic setback for the El Segundo area and for the County as a whole. The Air Force Base employees 3,200 military and civilian employees and the Aerospace Corporation has over 4,300 employees representing a combined payroll of $325 million annually. In addition, the two agencies have local goods and services contracts for over $362 million with a "trickle down" effect nearly three times To underscore federal government value of contracts that amount. the widescale impacts that would occur if the does opt to remove the facilities, the total with area aerospace contractors such as TRW, Hughes, Rockwell and Wyle Labs is $6.5 billion. - M O R E - Hahn --Etlethiran Dana Antonovich Schabarum F6:2 i AUG 14 1990 MOTION -(//at 7L- -2- I, THEREFORE, MOVE THAT THE BOARD: 1. Instruct the Board's Executive Officer to prepare a five -signature letter informing the U.S. Department of Defense of our unanimous opposition to any plan to either close or relocate the El Segundo Air Force Base/Space Systems Division, citing the full negative fiscal effects such actions would have on the aerospace industry in Southern California and on Los Angeles County in particular; and 2. Further direct the Executive Officer to also forward the same information to all members of the Los Angeles County and Southern California Congressional delegation. F6:2 RESOLUTION NO. lf;`ice A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF F.I. SECUNDO, CALIFoRNIA, IN SUPPORT OF RETAINING THE Los ANCELLU AIR FORCE BASE/SPACE SYSTFMS DIVISION AT 1TS PRESrNT LOCATION IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO WHEREAS, the Department of Defense is considering a proposal to the United States Congress to relocate and/or close some of its bases across the nation; and WHEREAS, one of these bases is the Los Angeles Air Force Base/Space Systems Division, which facility is located in the Los Angeles Basin, home of the nation's aerospace industry; and WHEREAS, there is under consideration the relocation of this base to other areas of the Western states, including Colorado Springs, Colorado; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Vandenburg Air Force Base, California; and Riverside, California; and WHEREAS, loss of this base would result in a very serious and adverse impact on the economy of this region, including the loss of over 7500 jobs; loss of an annual payroll of $310 million; loss of $362 million dollars per year in local goods and services; loss of almost $2 billion dollars in lost contracts to aerospace suppliers in the Los Angeles Basin; and WHEREAS, the loss of the aforesaid business would seriously decrease tax revenues necessary for the support of the City of El Segundo; and WHEREAS, it would cost the government up to $1 billion to rebuild the existing educational and research and development facilities already in place. NOW, 'THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SECUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOW$: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of El Segundo concludes that the retention of the Los Angeles Air Force Base at its present location is in the economic and strategic interest of the nation's objectives in both space exploration and defense of our country, as well as the economic interest of the citizens and businesses of the City of El Segundo. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of El Segundo on behalf of its citizens does hereby urge the Department of Defense and the United States Congress to retain the Los Angeles Air Force Base/Space Systems Division in the City of El Segundo. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this I ; th da • f Ju , 1990. M yor of t ---..di.ty Clerk (seal) ity of El Segundo, ;:nii.jornia RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE POTENTIAL CLOSURE OF THE LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE/SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION AND COMMITTING To PARTICIPATE IN EFFORTS TO ADDRESS THE HOUSING NEEDS OF THE AIR FORCE BASE. WHEREAS, there is con*ideration by the Department of Defen..n tO relocate ito existing Los Angeles Air ±once Base/Space S stems Division to another location due to concern about the y for military personnel stationed here; and quality of life WHEREAS, to a largc extent; the consideration to relocate is based upon a lack of adequate, affordable housing for military families; and WHEREAS, an action plan and a coordinated and concerted community effort by local and area governments to help the Los Angeles Air Force Base/Space Systems Division Officials identify solutions is of utmost necessity; and WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Air Force Base/space Systems Division has an immediate need for approximately 250 affordable military housing units for its non-commissioned officers; and WHEREAS, the City of El Segundo is ideally located in relation to the Los Angeles Air Force Base/Space Systems Division inasmuch as the commute therein is less than the desired maximum goal of 30 minutes; and WHEREAS, a clear commitment by the City of El Segundo to help the Air Force solve its housing problem would surely influence the Department of Defense towards keeping the Base in Los Angeles. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of El Segundo does hereby commit to participate with other jurisdictions to pursue ever available means to cause the construction of military family housing units and will sponsor such special legislation as may be required. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said city, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of August, 1990. ATTEST: City Clerk (SEAL) Mayor of the City of El Segundo, California CITY O CITY COUN L HAWTHORNE Augu-t 10, 1990 "CITY Or COOD NEIGHBORS" The onorable Roger Creighton Mayo .', City of Hermosa Beach 1315 valley Drive Herm.sa Beach, CA 90254 Dear ayor Creign: Street Hawthorne 02SD 4455 We,t 126th , California (213) 970.7900 SUBJECT: POTENTIAL RELOCATION OF THE LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE The with out here. ities of El Segundo and Hawthorne have been meeting fficials of the Los Angeles Air Force Base in an all- ffort to keep this vital segment of our communities It a; pears that a commitment of all South Bay cities to simplb pledge their efforts through the use of existing legis ation, or by sponsoring special legislation as may be neces-ary to accommodate the construction of affordable milit=ry housing, is the single most important action that needs, to be done now. T ha e enclosed a copy of Resolution No. 5896 of the City of H-wthorne which we will adopt on August 13, 1990.. I urge your city to adopt this resolution and to forward a copy .f it to me no later. than September 3, 1990. Keepig the Los Angeles Air Force Base here is the best econo'ica.l alternative for the United States Air Force. It is al o our best economical alternative. Since ely, Betty J. Ai`sworth Mayor BJA:b Enclosure: Resolution No. 5896 WH to relo locatio personn WH based u families WH. local .a Officia WH• for 250 officer= WH to the is less WH the Air Departm. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 5896 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE POTENTIAL CLOSURE OP THE LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE AND COMMITTING TO ASSIST IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NECESSARY MILITARY HOUSING UNITS. REAS, there is consideration by the Department of Defense ate its existing Los Angeles Air Force Base to another due to concern about the quality of life for military 1 stationed there; and REAS, to a large extent, the consideration to relocate is on a lack of adequate, affordable housing for military ; and REAS, an action plan and a coordinated community effort by d area governments to help the Los Angeles Air Force Base ass identify solutions is of utmost necessity; and REAS, the Los Angeles Air Force Base has an immediate need -ffordable military housing units for its non --commissioned • and -EAS, the City of Hawthorne is ideally located in relation s Angeles Air Force Base inasmuch as the commute therein han the desired maximum goal of 30 minutes; and AS, a clear commitment by the City of Hawthorne to help orce solve its housing problem would surely influence the t of Defense towards keeping the base in Los Angeles. BE commit milita legisla PA IT THLFLEFORE RESOLVED that the City of Hawthorne will o use every available means to cause the construction of family housing units and will sponsor such special ion as may be required. SED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1990. ATTEST: Chief D:puty City Clerk BETTY J. AINSWORTH, MAYOR City Of Hawthorne, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: MICHAEL ADAMSON City Attorney MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, August 28, 1990, at the hour of 7:44 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 7:15 P.M. pur- suant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) regarding Potential Litigation concerning The Sister Cities Association; and, Govern- ment Code Section 54956.8 regarding Real Property Negotiations with Hermosa Beach City School District Board of Trustees con- cerning the surplus property at the South School site. The ses- sion was adjourned at 7:40 P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Cindy Wilson, Director of General Services ROLL CALL Present: Essertier, Midstokke, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Creighton Absent: None PROCLAMATIONS - Constitution Week, September 17 through 23, 1990: the proclamation was accepted by Wilma Burt on behalf of the Daughters of the American Revolution. City Manager Northcraft introduced the new Director of General Services, Cindy Wilson. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION TO PUBLIC ACCESS COMPETITION CONTESTANTS - Michele Tercero, City staff liaison for Cable Access Television, presented the contestants of the first Public Access Public Service Announcement Competition, sponsored jointly by the City and MultiVision Cable TV. The contestants were: Dennis Estabrook, whose Public Service Announcement was shown; Gabrielle Laralle; Wayne K. Stanton; Irene Carloni; Gary Butterworth; and,. Alan Cowan. Mayor Creighton awarded the certificates. APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM Outgoing Mayor Creighton thanked the citizens and the City staff. A. Designate Mayor for a nine month term ending June 25, 1991. B. Designate Mayor Pro Tempore for a nine month term ending June 25, 1991 Action: To designate Chuck Sheldon as Mayor for a nine month term ending June 25, 1991, and to designate Kathleen Midstokke as Mayor Pro Tem for a nine month term ending June 25, 1991. Motion Mayor Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. Page 1 Minutes 08-28-90 Newly designated Mayor Sheldon presented a plaque of appreciation to outgoing Mayor Creighton. C. Intergovernmental agencies requiring appointment of Mayor as delegate. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated August 20, 1990. Action: 1) To appoint the Mayor as the delegate to the Los Angles County - City Selection Committee. 2) To appoint the Mayor as delegate and Mayor Pro Tem as alternate to the South Bay Cities Sanitation District Board of Directors. 3) To appoint the Mayor as delegate and Mayor Pro Tem as alternate to the Inglewood Fire Training Authority. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. Mayor Sheldon thanked his family, friends and supporters for the opportunity to serve the City. The Meeting recessed at 8:02 P.M. The Meeting reconvened at 8:19 P.M. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (j) with the exceptions of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (e) Midstokke, (g) Wiemans, and (j) Mayor Sheldon. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. (a) (b) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular meeting of the City Council held on August 14, 1990; 2) Special meeting of the City Council held on. August 8, 1990. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants No. 34213 and Nos. 34407 through 34543 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 34409 through 34412 inclusive, and No. 34470 and No. 34472; and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the July, 1990 finan- cial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. Page 2 Minutes 08-28-90 (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) Approval of agreements between the City of Hermosa Beach and nine local non-profit agencies for which the City has appropriated funds this fiscal year. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated Au- gust 8, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to her objection, in specific, to City funding for the Sister Cities Association, and, in general, for non-profit uses. Councilmember Creighton objected to funding the 1736 Family Crisis Center. Action: To approve all agreements except the Sister Cities Association and the 1736 Family Crisis Center. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objections of Midstokke and Mayor Sheldon. Recommendation to authorize disposal of the 1966 Segraves fire engine to the highest bidder over $5,000. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated August 20, 1990. Recommendation to appoint part-time City Prosecutor, approve agreement for legal services, and authorize Mayor to sign agreement. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated August 16, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to his request to hear the result of the Council Sub -Committee meeting to review the applicants. Councilmember Creighton responded that the Sub -Committee totally agreed with the staff recommendation. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to appoint David G. Coffey as part-time City Prosecutor, approve the agreement for legal services, and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. Recommendation to accept as complete restoration of baseball/soccer field at Valley Park. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated August 21, 1990. Recommendation to receive and file report on City assis- tance with fund raising for purchase of vehicles for Loreto. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. North - craft dated August 23, 1990. Recommendation to receive and file report on donations and grants received by the city. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated August 21, 1990. Page 3 Minutes 08-28-90 This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Mayor Sheldon for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to his desire to publicly thank the following donors: 1) 2) $5,000 - South Bay Hospital $2,954 - South Bay Coalition for a Drug Free Youth 3) $1,500 - Sandpipers 4) Free stolen car tracking system and installation from Lojac Company 5) Free additional Lojac system with help of South Bay Autohaus of two new bicycles for summer beach patrol from Beach Cities Cycle Shop radar guns and radar speed sign from South Bay auto dealerships and donations of equipment for two traffic units. State Board of Corrections, Standards and Training 6) Free use 7) Two new 8) Painting 9) $3,000 - Action: To receive and file. Motion Mayor Sheldon, Second Creighton. So ordered. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1043 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT FOR THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR THE BILT- MORE SITE TO CHANGE THE PERMITTED USE FROM A HOTEL TO RESIDENTIAL, AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO REZONE PARK- ING LOT ',Cu FROM SAID SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TO C-2, RE- STRICTED COMMERCIAL, AND ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION. For adoption. (b) Action: To adopt Ordinance NO. 90-1043. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objections of Wiemans and Mayor Sheldon. ORDINANCE NO. 90-1044 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT BY CHANGING THE ',AREA 10,1 FROM R -2B TO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AS DESCRIBED BELOW AND SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP AND ADOPTING AN ENVIRON- MENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 90-1044. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Sheldon. So ordered, noting the abstention of Councilmembers Creighton and Midstokke. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items (e), (g), and (j) were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity. Page 4 Minutes 08-28-90 Newly appointed City Prosecutor David G. Coffey was introduced at this time. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS - None MUNICIPAL MATTERS Item 8 was heard at this time but is listed in order for clarity. 5. APPROVAL OF A COMMUNITY TREE PLANTING PROGRAM FOR THE HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELT TO BE CONDUCTED IN JANUARY, 1991. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 20, 1990. Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The Council commended the staff for an innovative program. Action: To approve the staff report. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered 6. UPDATED APPRAISAL FOR SOUTH SCHOOL. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated August 23, 1990. City Manager Northcraft asked that item 6 be held over until the Council had an opportunity to discuss the sta- tus of negotiations with the Hermosa Beach School Board of Trustees. Addressing the Council on this matter was: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, questioning the need to purchase the South School site. Action: To table this item until the end of the meet- ing; recess to a closed session before adjourning the regular meeting; then reconvene to make a decision on this item. Motion Creighton, second Midstokke. So ordered. Final Action: To continue item 6 to the Regular Meeting of September 11, 1990. Motion Creighton, Second Midstokke. So ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. 7. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REQUEST FROM LOS ANGELES COUNTY TO AMEND BEACH ORDINANCE, with ordinance for introduction. Memorandum from Public Safety Direc- tor Steve Wisniewski dated August 21, 1990. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1045. Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. Page 5 Minutes 08-28-90 Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 90-1045, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 5-9 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Motion Creighton, second Essertier. AYES: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon NOES: None 8. INTERPRETATION OF ZONING ORDINANCE RE. MOTORCYCLE SALES AND MOTORCYCLE PARTS SALES, with policy statement No. 90-1, for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 22, 1990. Supplemental draft minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of August 21, 1990. Associate Planner Ken Robertson presented the staff re- port and responded to Council questions. Addressing the Council on this matter were: Jack Wood - 200 Pier Avenue, representing the appellant and speaking against separate defini- tions for automobile and motorcycle parts sales James Peirce - 2121 Power Street, clarifying the Planning Commission recommendation for a public hearing Jerry Compton - 832 Second Street, in favor of separate definitions Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., against separate definitions Action: To amend the title of Policy Statement to Resolution and to adopt resolution No. 90-5401, enti- tled, ',A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT MOTORCYCLE SALES AND MOTORCYCLE PARTS RETAIL SALES ARE DISTINCT FROM AUTO SALES AND AUTO PARTS SALES.", and, to return it to the Planning Commission to set a public hearing to consider a text amendment to the permitted use sectionof the zoning code. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Northcraft announced that the Pro - Volleyball Tournament was televised and will be re- played on Saturday, September 1, 1990, and, that the Chamber of Commerce' annual Labor Day "Fiesta de las Artes" would be held this weekend on September 1, 2, and 3, 1990. Mayor Sheldon congratulated the Community Center Founda- tion and all Community Resource staff who made the "60's Page 6 Minutes 08-28-90 Party" so successful, and, Mary Rooney, the Community Resource staff, the Police Department, and all others for their work on the Pro -Volleyball Tournament. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) (b) Memorandum regarding the waiver of an automatic vacancy on the Planning Commission. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 20, 1990. Councilmember Midstokke questioned Commissioner Peirce's eligibility due to the eight year rule. Councilmember Creighton asked the City Attorney to research and clari- fy the eight year rule. Action: To waive the automatic vacancy requirement due to two absences in a quarter for Commissioner Peirce. Motion Mayor Sheldon, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the objection of Midstokke. Request for special meeting for interviews of Planning Commission applicants. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft and City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dat- ed August 20, 1990. Action: Mayor Sheldon directed that a tentative meeting for Monday, September 10, 1990, at 7:00 P.M. be set, subject to the availability of Councilmember Wiemans. 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None CITIZEN COMMENTS - NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS - None The Regular Meeting recessed to a closed session at 9:25 P.M. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding Real Prop- erty Negotiations with Hermosa Beach City School District Board of Trustees concerning surplus property at the South School site. The closed session adjourned at 9:52 P.M. The Regular Meeting reconvened at 9:53 P.M. Item 6 was heard at this time but is listed in order for clarity. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, August 28, 1990., at the hour of 9:58 P.M., to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, September 11, 1990, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Page 7 Centel Deputy City Clerk Minutes 08-28-90 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:43:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 • PAGE 0001 DATE 09/06/90 2 3 PAY VENDOR NAME • VND 4 - ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC . PROJ #f ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO 4 UNENC CHK 4 DATE EXP 1N 2 3 4 a 6 H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00265 $42.78 00831 34543 5 6 7 6 7 n TELE CHGS/AUG 90 09/05/90 . DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE H GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 ` 001-400-2101-4304 ' 00648 ' $203.74 ` - - $0.00 00831 09/00/90 34545 9 10 11 12 10 11 Iz FELE CHGS/AUG 90 '- 09/05/90 POLICE /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL+,####.t###########################it################################## $246.52 $0.00 09/00/90 13 15 16 3 1s .. .. H JOHN#HOGS 01842-'` -705-400-1209-4324 00148 $80.0010 10973 34 X46 17 16 20 16 7 10 AIRFARE/ARBITRA'TION 09/05/90 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *4* VENDOR TOTAL ****************#################4###############it#############'#'# 380.00 $0.00 09/05/90 21 22 24 1924 21 ### PAY CODE TOTAL###x#?t###=itxifx#####x#*#########it##*#########tt#############it#h#*### $326.52 25 26 27 22 23 24 R A L7•; E TROPHIES 02744 001-400-1101-4319 00039 $66.93 00082 34549 z0 29 30 31 25 zc. 27 MISC CHGS/AUG 90 08/31/90. CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS ### VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************.--% $66.9335 $0.00 09/06/90 32 33 20 29 30 R A-1 COAST RENTALS 000?_9 160 400 3102-4309 00520 $84.36 104804 00081 34550 37 36 30 39 31 32 33 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 '04804 08/31/90 ''""SEWER/ST,.DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ;. .. .. �. ' '..: ,. .. ?t## VENDOR TOTAL #####it #i'.###it ?+##itKit#######.,####it?t##!:######.. .: i!###########it######is##### $84'.36 :$0.00 .09/06/90. 40 41 42 43 3.1 30 36 37 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 001-400-2101-4201 00632 $.1, 133. ?_O RADIO 15845 00048 34531 44 45 46 47 30 39 4o MAINT/SEP 90 15845 08/25/90 . POLICE ./CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 - 001-400-2201-4201 00159 -' $283.30 15845 $0.00 00048 09/06/90 34551 40 49 50 51 41 42 43 RADIO MAINT/SEP 90 15845 08/25/90 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS 00935 110-400-3302-4307 00023 $314.00 16005 $0.00 00058 09/06/90 34551 52 S3 54 55 .RADIO MAINT/SEP 90 16005 • 08/25/90 PARKING ENF /RADIO MAINTENANCE ### VENDOR TOTAL###'"#'<#x####>t't###########i`####it#:+..###..##it####..##it#it##it###?t##it###! ' $0.00 09/06/90 56 57 56 46 *** $1,730.5059 47 4o 49 R AHN'S RESTAURANT .03610 001-210-0000-2110 03871 $250.00 BANNER 02984 11029 34552 60 61 62 50• 51 52 . DEPOSIT REFUND .02984 08/30/90 . :'/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE . 30.00 .• 09/05/90 663 4 65 66 53 54 55 ` 69 69 70 71 56 57 72 3 ,75 y. 1� \J • • J J J y J J FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:43:32 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 PAGE 0002 3 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN It . AMOUNT INV/REF PO ;t CHK * DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 2 4 G *** VENDOR TOTAL ***** ******#il.±t; ****i!**** *****ir********±Fir****n********************* $2,50.00 5 6 7 a 7 8 9 0 ALERT ALL n � t 00245 001-400-2201-4305 00381 � $38. 83 n � t-,� 008-0220 1 _ 226 a� 34553 9 I2 10 II I FIRE PR_.V. WEEK SUPPLIES —0220 08/24/90 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ytry.stb•*tttr?!***?!*********sr#trtr#tr** qtr•. ;!.*.n .tttr+r;r?ter****p*** rte****tr*jr******* $38. 88 $25. EM, 09/0.190 13 14 15 6 1, R COMMANDER ANTHONY*ALTFELD 00774 001-400-2101-4312 01444 $77.25 00831 34354 18 19 20 I, 19 MEALS/CAREER SEMINAR 08/22/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *trig VENDOR TOTAL t** ****t*t** ** *t****t*t*t*t***************4*********tr*******44***4*****'^*tr*x ¢77. 25 $0.00 09/05/90 2' 22 24 24 19 23 z1 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL' .. " 00152 001-400-2201-4309 00947 $29.00 00017 34505 25 26 27 28 2 m30 24 P, UTILITY RAGS/AUG 90 ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 08/31/90 FIRE 00152 001-400-3104-4309 00531 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $29.0000017- $0.00 09/06/90 347.,/ 29 31 3z 25 26 27 R UTILITY RAGS/AUG 90 ARAT F_X /R F_D STAR INDUSTRIAL-. • 08/31/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY -'00192 -.�."`001-400-4204-4309 01732 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $162.28 $0.00 00017 09/06/90 34333 33 34 35 3G 20 29 0 R UTILITY RAGS/AUG 90 ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 08/31/90 BLDG MAI -NT 00152 001400-4205-4309 00488 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $47.50 $0.00 00017 09/06/90 34555 37 30 30 31 32 33 R .UTILITY RAGS/AUG 90 - ... ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL•. "' 08/31/90 -EQUIP 'SERVICE 3. ' 00152 .�z�. 110-400-3302-4309 00701 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS , '''$7.60 •'` $0.00 00017 09/06/90 34555 42 4J 34 3 5 36 UTILITY RAGS/AUG 90 08/31/90 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ************#*ti•******** ********#fruitY?rirtr##** ***** rtrir#irftr#tri'itr+r##tr#trtrtr $275. 3847 $0.00 09/06/90 44 45 46 37 18 39 R AUTOMATED FILING SYSTEMS, INC. 03535 %' 001-400-2101-4305 '01345 $244.80 8686 00392 ' 34556 49 50 a2 40 41 42 FILE FOLDERS/PD RECORDS 8686 03/16/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ### VENDOR TOTAL irtr±r trtrirtrt*trtr;rtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrt*trt*trtrtrtrtrtrtrtrirttt�•trtrtrtrt*trtrtrtrtrtrtrt*trtrn•t*trt*trtrtrn•a xtrtrtrtrtr $244. 80 $244.80 09/05/90 5J s. s 43 44 45 R• BEACHFRONT PRINTING F 03595 001-400-1203-4305 002.78 $180.74 SOb 180'.7 9/057 56 57 58 59 46 47 46 49 *** VENDOR SONNEL ACTION FORMS 506 09/05/90 PERSONNEL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES TOTAL ftr*trt***xt<irt*i*z<irt*trt*ir*trt*trt*t*t*iri!•iri*trt*trt-•n;.trt*trt*tr#tr#trt*trt*irt**irtrtrtrtr•mtrtrt*trfitrt*trt*u•t*tr $180.74 $1c30. 74 U9/U3/90 60 62 63 5065 51 R IIERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. 02664 001-400-2101-4305 01344 •_ - '• 1 $1,150.77 PER Se' E 398 00396 34550 6. 66 67 Ga 52 DJ 54 55 mA>-F-i �CITATI i • 31, 04b. 15 09 05/9 69 70 71 56 \7 72 73 74 , 75 7r JJ 411, dr AP op s .11115. s 411+ • 4r r • • a FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:43:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 PAGE 0003 DATE 09/06/5'0 fi- 2 3 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # .. ACCOUNT NUMBER. TRN #. •AMOUNT . • INV/REF PO # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC CHK # DATE EXP N. 2 3 4 5 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL 3t*+r****••3s*?t*t=*****at************ f**** t*•r*s ***ate+brit****ir+t****trattttt*+ *** $1, 150. 77.6 • 5 6 7 ] 9 R BIG D FLOOR COVERING SUPPLIES 00846' 001-400-4204-4309 01727 $128.10 LN33297 00489 34559 9 10 11 2 10 12 COVE BASE/COMM. CENTER 33297 00/22/90 BLDG: MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VF_NDOR TOTAL*************;+r********irit****ira****rt*tr****+t+rjrtt+t+r*************tttt*ff*** $126.10 $128.10 09/06/90 '3 14 15 16 R RAY*BIRGE & ASSOCIATES 03607 001-400-2101-4312 01443 $1,158.00 00825 34560 1] 18 19 20 16 17 18 TUITION/3 OFFICERS 00/22/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************it****•tt****+t'*ittritar****tt********grit*****i *** $1, 158. 00 $0.00 09/05/90 2' 22 23 24 29 ?1 _ R CHRIS*P.ROWN 03615 001-210-0000-2110 03667 $100.00 3716 00556 34561 25 26 27 28 22 23 24 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 3716 08/30/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL***.****************************************#*tFtt•>t******************** $100. 00 $0.00 09/05/90 29 30 31 3z 25 26 27 R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00404 '$702.00 2494 00604 34562 33 34 35 36 20 23 30 PLAN CHECK/612 TENTH ST 2494 08/1C)/90 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE_/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ** tat*********to*tc-*ta************ttiE******** ***asp.ca•tttF*****tFit* *nttt.nit*** $702.00 . $702.00 09/05/90 3] 38 39 40 31 32 33 .. P. • CA AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM ASSOC. 01863 001-400-220i-4315 . 00062 $50.00 11234 .. 34563 42 43 44 34 35 36 ANNUAL DUES/P. OSEKOWSV,Y 08/27/90 FIRE /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL ***k**+ *****n********************+r************sr************+r******* $50. 00 $0. 00 09/05/90 45 46 48 ]] 38 39 _. R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 ."' 001-202-0000-2_020 01102 $10,025.62 00061 ' '34564 49 50 52 m 41 42 PARKS MAINT/JUNE 90 06/30/90 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 001-202-0000-2020 01103 $1,606.96CR55 $0.00 00061 09/06/90 34564 63 54 56 43 m 5 PARKS MAINT/JUNE 90 06/30/90 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE R • ' CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. -, ' . 00599 ' ' 001-202-0000-2_020 ' 01104 $3, 150.00 $0.00 0 0„061 09/06/90 34564 5] 59 46 47 m MEDIANS MAINT/JUNE_ 90 06/30/90 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. '00599 001-202-0000-2020 01105 $2,179.2OCRn $0.00 0 061 09/06/90 3456463 60 61 62 49 50 5 1 MEDIANS MAINT/JUNE 90 _06/30/90 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE • .. .. .... ,. .. $0.00 . 09/06/90 64 65 66 6] 52 53 54 • 60 0, 70 71 , ,. 56 Q. n 3 ]4 5 7, L V! t 6 y .G 3 5 6 9 10 12 13 14 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3, 46 41 42 43 45 411 4] 48 49 50 51 52 FINANCE—SFA340 -4 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 ' PAGE 0004 DATE 09/06/90 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION s ] AMOUNT PO # UNENC CHK # DATE EXP R • CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 001-400-3101-4201 0004B $3,300.00 00044 $0.00 00044 $0.00 00044 34564 09/05/90 34364 09/03/90 34364 MED rA ` a ' -• 0 /31/90 MEDIANS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVA.T R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599' 001-400-3101-4201 00049 $97.41CR MEDIAN MA/NTT—JULY-70 07/31/90 MEDIANS /CONTRACT SERVICE_/PRIVAT R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599 001-400-6101-4201 00194 $10,544.15 PARKS MAINI/JULY VU 07/31/90 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. 00599.: 001-400-6101-4201 00195 $1,265.52CR $0.00 00044 09/05/90' 34564 PARKS MAINI/JULY 90 07/31/90 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************t**** ****stir******* **************** $21,870.68 $0.00 09/05/90 R CA MUNICIPAL STATISTICS, INC. 03066 001-400-1202-4201 00229 $350.00 00172 34565 RF_F'UR TiERV/CAFR 08/20/90 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL *****************tt***********tt*4t**************it********tt************ $330. 00 $350.00 09/03/90 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 ': 001-400-2101-4303 00007 .' $34.98 • 00810 34566 WAILR BILLS/AUG 90 08/31/90 POLICE /UTILITIES R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00107 $658.26 $0.00 00810 09/03/90 34566 WAIER HILLS/AUG 90 -08/31/90 MEDIANS /UTILITIES R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE .. 00016. 001-400-4204-4303 00405 $457.20 $0.00 00810 09/05/90 34566 Wi;IER BILLS/AUG 90 00/31/90 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00318 $3,587.81 $0.00 00810 09/05/90 34566 WATER BILLS/AUG YU U8/31/90 PARKS /UTILITIES *tt* VENDOR TOTAL_***************tt******************************#*******************#t $4,738.25 $0.00 09/09/90 R HAROLD OR PATRICIA*CALLOWAY 03604 110-300-0000-3302 33770 $46.00 844865 00175 34567 CITE PAYMEN( REFUND 44865 08/:.3/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING *** VENDOR TOTAL_********************tt******tt************stat:x******************tt****** . , .. '$46.00 $0.00 09/05/90 R CARTER'S APPLIANCE SERVICE '03588 001-400-2101-4306 00850 $80.48 52328 00912 34568 MICROWAVE-REPAI' - •_ .• -• POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $80.06 .09/05/90 • • 4 6 ] a 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 1] IB 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 213 29 30 3, 32 33 34 35 36 3] 38 39 40 41 42 43 45 46 4] 40 99 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 5] 50 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ]1 72 ,3 )5 ]9, 1J J • i • • • D iJ • J I, .J i • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME_ 13:43:52 CTTV OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 ' PAGE 0005 ,y DATE 09/06/90 2 3 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO # UNENC CHK # DATE EXP 2 3 4 4 s 5 6 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********teat************************************************n********* $80.48. 7 6 7 9 .; ,. . 10 11 R JEANNE*CARUSO 03293= 001-400-2101-4313 00299 . $307.00 00820 • 34569 ,2 ,0 f9EALS/ FEL/MGRS SEMINAR 08/15/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC $0.00 09/05/90 13 ,4 ,5 12 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******.************************************************************ 3307. 00 ,6 17 14 R 0 ,5 CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 00963' $34.37 00812 34570 20 ,6 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 50.00 09/06/90 21 7 22 R CHAMPION 23 ,9 CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-4205-4311 00193 $255.01 00812 34570 24 19 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90. EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE_ $0.00 09/06/90 25 20 26 21 *** VENDOR TOTAL + * ***** ' '** !' '**** **** ***nr****************i ***** ******�t********* $289. 38 2e 22 29 23 30 R CHAPMAN COLLEGE 31 24 03026 001-400-2101-4312 01442 $10.00 00832 34571 32 25 IUIIIUN/HARII/JAAKOLA • 08/27/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE ,"POST $0.00 09/05/90 33 34 27 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************'************************************?.*** $10. oe 35 36 28 37 29 36 30 R CHEVRON USA, INC. 00634 001-400-2101-4310 00272 $389.32 1417284419 00714 34572 39 40 31 RISC CH - -• -"19-07/31/90 POLICE -/MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES .. $0.00 '-09/06/90 41 32 .. 42 33 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************e******************t?-'.********n*********************** : —$389.32 43 44 34 45 35 46 36 R COAST GLASS COMPANY 00325 001-400-4204-4309 01731 $98.51 7660 00815 34573 47 4e 37 MISC. CHAH(,`LS/AUG 90 7660 08/31/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/06/90 49 3e .. so 35 *** VENDOR TOTAL**********.*****************r.*****r,.*************************'it******* $98.51 52 M 53 4I 54 42 R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-2101-4304 00650 $15.65 00305164 00817 34574 55 56 43 44 LUNG DISl7SNC'E/AUG 90 . 05164 . ". 08/31/90 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/06/90 5' sa 45 . *** VENDOR TOTAL*********'***************************************************#******* - $15.65 659 o 46 61 47 62 w R CONNECTING POINT LEASING 03617 001-400-2101-4201 00631 $495.78 2367262 00051 34575 6364 49 COMPUTER RENTAL/AUG 90 67262 "• 08/22/90 . POLICE - ,>'/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/05/90 65 50 .. 66 67 52 68 69 53 70 54 ), 72 55 56 /3 r7 74 'S J 4' Jo W v 4o .Y 4, 4, .1, G FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:43:52 3 6 t 6 9 3 14 ie 2! 2 Z. 2: 2. 3 3 3 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 ' PAG 0006 DATE 09/06/90 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # • ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO ',R UNENC CHK # DATE EXP R CONNECTING POINT LEASING 03617 001-400-2201-4201 00158 3161.41 2367262 00051 34575 ■9IUIJH HtNIAL/AUG 90 6/262 U8/'22/9U FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R CONNECTING POINT LEASING 03617• 001-400-2701-4201 00003 3334.36 2367262 $0.00 00031 09/05/90 34375 CONPUIER-PEf3IAL/AUG70----4677.762-------(78/...2/90 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING CIVIL DEFENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03617 170-400-2103-4201 00060 3161.41 2367262 0b122/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 31, 152. 96 30.00 00051 30.00 09/03/90 34575 09/05/90 CCTIPUIEH HENIAL/AUG 90 6/262 aaa VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************#tris*********tt***** R CONTINUING EDUC. OF THE BAR 03606 001-400-1131-4201 00600 $107.41 16575 09347 34576 bUBSCHINIIUN/CITY CLERA 165/5.. 08/28/90 . CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ?** ***3**aaaaaaat*at*t*aat*aaaaaaaaaaat*at*******a*******aa**aa#*********aa 3107. 41 30.00 09/05/90 F. COOPERS &: LYBRAN.D 03498 001-400-1202-4201 00230 311, 180.00 1217-000292 00177 34577 FROG DILL 2/FY 90 AUDIT 00292 .08/29/90 . FINANCE ADMIN ../CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL aaaaaaaaa*,,.nt**x*:?********a*x+*t*a*ke*3*?*t*t*ua**a**#*?** *#?***:***trxi* -±*xt*x+** ***a* $11, 180. 00 30.00 09/06/90 R D. A. R. E. AMERICA 03530 001-400-2101-4305 01343 $491. 58 1 501 00388 34578 DARE PROMOTIONAL PRODUCT 1501 .08/17/90' 210004 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ' . a** * VENDOR TOTAL at*aaaaaaaaatr azt*.i*at*aaaaaaaaaat*t*aat*a*+,i*at*•naaaaaaaat*a***i*a*#;*i*t*t***t*a*xa* j* '3491.58 3480.48 09/05/90 R DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 001-400-2101-4311 00960 $422.34 08/31/90 POLICE . /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01390 • 110-400-3302-4311 00622 $147.21 00820 30.00 00820 34579 09/0h/90 34579 MISC CHCS/AUG 90 R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC CHGS/AUG 90 +*{*i* VENDOR TOTAL ** *** *aaaaaa***** *** *** 08/31/90 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE *******at*t** ************ *** ********i*i*** ****** 3569. 55 30.00 09/06/90 R DATA SAFE • . "00156 001-400-1206-4201 '00757 (3195.50 50710 00015 34580 TAPE STOR./8-12 TO 9-11 50710 08/15/90 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTALaaaaaaaaaat*a*aaaaa************aaaaaaaaaaaaaaat*aaaaaa* ******i********* 3195.50 30.00 09/06/90 R EASTMAN, INC. 02514 001-400-1208-4305 . 00802 $497.55 00825 34581 MSC. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 30.00 09/06/90 2.5 36 37 30 39 40 4, 42 43 44 45 .16 47 46 49 56 51 53 54 55 56'1 tt 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 • 11 • • • • • • • • • V • • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:43:52 5 r a 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4e 4 43 44 45 49 47 CITY OF HERMOJSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 PAGE 0007 DATE_ 09/06/70 o 2 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 • AMOUNT INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO # UNENC CHK # DATE EXP '•*** VENDOR TOTAL ******:******************t************************************t ***** $497.55 R EL C,AMINO COLLEGE 01469 001-400-2101-4312 01437 $7.50 00833 $0.00 34582 09103/90 ICJTTIIIV77OFFICER 08/28/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE RUST *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************************************tt**** $7.50 R STEVE*ENDOM 01034 001-400--2101-4312 01441 $77.25 00930 $0.00 34583 09/05/90 , e MLALbiCAREER SL711NAtt 08/_2/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************?*****************?********* $77.25 0 R FAMLET Y< ASSOCIATES 03605 001-210-0000-2110 03876 $1,575.00 95602 00562 34584 2 3 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 95602 08/30/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL i**+*****r*r*** ***±r********t***t*t** *****************i****j****t********************?****** $1,575.00 =0.00 09/05/90 5 R FANTASY NAILS . 03611 001-210-0000-2110 03870 $250.00 97978 11028 345E5 9 9 o BANNER DEPOSIT REFUND 97978 08/30/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL **i*****[*******t******t****************t********jt*************************** $250.00 $0.00 09/05/90 z 3 R FAX SERVICES INTERNATIONAL 03612 001-300-0000-3207 01102 • $25.00 90761 11027 34586 INSPECTION FEE REFUND 90761 08/30/90 /OCCUPANCY PERMITS *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************************************* $25. 00 $0.00 09/05/90 R FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION 03613 001-210-0000-2110 03873 $375.00 95601 00561 34587 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 95601 08/30/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE **** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************** $375.00 $0.00 09/05/90 R • GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY 00058 001-400-4204-4309 01730 3298.62 303848/303847 00830 34588 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 03847 08/31/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*************%****************-********************************************** $298.62 $0.00 09/06/90 ' e R GRISWOLD'S 03601. 001-400-2101-4312 01438 $173.25 00828 e e 34589 e HOTEL/A. ALTFELD 08/22/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 09/05/90 ' , , 49 51 53 54 r., y 4, v 411, 4, • 3 8 9 2 2 2' 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3c 4c 41 4 43 45 46 41 48 5c 51 52 53 54 5' FINANCE—SFA34O TIME 13:43:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 • PAGE 0006 DATE_ 09/06/90 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # DATE INVC ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN it AMOUNT INV/REF PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO '# UNENC CHK # DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL****:a.*************************************************************** 3173.25 R GRISL•I0LD'5 03602 001-400-2101-4312 01439 3173.23 00827 34090 HOTEL/S. ENDOf1 08/22/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 30. 00 09/00/90 ** - VENDOR TOTAL++'t!rta*st*x!t***ir*+t*+t*?tatit*i?•;t±r***+tar****attr*-ttititiratara•stt!n*it•**x+.tir***ir***it?rs:+tarftt 3173. 23 P, GRI5LJ0LD'S 03603 001-400-2101-4312 01440 3173.25 00626 34391 HOTEL/M. WRIGHT 08/22/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 30.00 09/05/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************'.t********* *****************#*i **** 3173. 25 R ADELE*GRONBACH 03616 001-210-0000-2110 03868 350.00 2117 00557 34592 ANIMAL_ TRAP REFUND 2117 08/30/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 30.00 09/05/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***********t************************t*************4*** *** ******* T.50.00 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED , ' 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00319 30.24 372-6186 00833 34594 FAX BILLING/AUG 90 —6186 08/30/90 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 30.00 09/06/90 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00325 30.66 372-6186 00833 34594 FAX BILLING/AUG 90 —6186 ',.08/30/90• • CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 30.00 09/06/90 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 3 ' 001-400-1201-4304 0036752.29 372-6186 00833 34594 FAX BILLING/AUG 90 —6186 08/30/90 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 30.00 09/06/90 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00377 34.53 372-6186 00833 34394 FAX BILLING/AUG 90 —6186 08/30/90 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 30.00 09/06/90 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00381 34.15 372-6186 00833 34594 FAX BILLING/AUG 90 —6186 08/30/90 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 30.00 09/06/90 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00266 30.82 372-6186 00833 34594 FAX BILLING/AUG 90 —6186 . 08/30/90 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 30.00 09/06/90 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00267 342.78 00831 34594 TELE CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 30.00 09/06/90 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00649 30.24 372-6186 00833 34094 FAX BILLING/AUG 90 —6186., 08/30/90 POLICE /TELEPHONE 30.00 .09/06/90 3 4 8 9 0 12 13 15 16 11 6 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 267 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 46 0 2 3 5 411 • .J a • J y 6 J. 9 2 3 .4• 5 6 9 0 5O. 3 5 i FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:43:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 PAGE 0009 DATE 09/06/90 2 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # DATE INVC ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # P503 # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC CHK # DATE EXP 2 3 4 6 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00651 $300.59 00831 34594 5 6 7 8 7 9 R TELL CHARGES/AUG 90 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 08/31/90 00015 • POLICE 001-400-2201-4304 00289 /TELEPHONE 9191.02 $0.00 00631 09/06/90 34594 10 I, 12 10 12 R TELE CHARGES/AUG 90 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 08/31/90 00015 08/30/90 00015 FIRE 001-400-4101-4304 00380 PLANNING 001-400-4201-4304 00356 /TELEPHONE 91.52 /TELEPHONE $2.58 $0.00 372-6186 00833 90.00 372-6186 00833 09/06/90 34594 09/06/90 34394 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 3 14 1, R FAX BILLIN -618 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 16 18 P. FAX BILLING/AUG 90 -6186 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 08/30/90 00015 BUILDING 001-400-4202-4304 00383 /TELEPHONE $25.80 $0.00 372-6186 00833 09/06/90 34594 21 22 23 24 19 20 z1 R FAX BILLING/AUG 90 -6186 . GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 08/30/90 00015 PUB WKS ADMIN 001-400-4202-4304 00384 /TELEPHONE 342.10 $0.00 00831 09/06/90 34574 25 26 27 28 22 2 3 24 R TELE CHARGES/AUG 90 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 08/31/90 00015 PUI3 WKS ADMIN 001-400-4601-4304 00442 /TELEPHONE $3.76 $0.00 372-6186 00833 09/06/90 34594 29 30 31 32 25 26 27 P. FAX BILLING/AUG 90 -6186 GTE CALIFORNIA, .INCORPORATED 08/30/90 00015 COMM RESOURCES 001-400-4601-4304 00443 /TELEPHONE $42.78 90.00 00831 09/06/90 345?4 33 34 35 36 28 29 30 R TELE CHARGES/AUG 90 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 08/31/90 00015 COMM RESOURCES 110-400-3302-4304 00377 /TELEPHONE 91.17 90.00 372-6186 00033 09/06/90 34594 37 38 39 40 31 FAX BILLING/AUG 90 -6186 '.08/30/90 PARKING ENF... . 33 *** VENDOR TOTAL *****************************************.******************** /TELEPHONE ***. ' 9667.03 $0.00 09/06/90 ' 42 43 44 34 35 36 P. CHRIS*GUF_RRANT 03383 001-210-0000-2110 03869 $50.00 2495 00556 34595 45 46 47 ' 48 37 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 2495 08/30/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 39 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL****+.tr****tr•tt•vetttattttt•rvtr•itattt•tttt-ititir*attttt*-tti±tt+ttt*tt•3t*atat?tttitit?t*:ir**?ttttt•tt•*****tt?ttttt•a• $50. 00 09/05/90 49 50 40 1 42 R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 00731 001-400-3103-4311 00596 319.95 -1C15105 00480 34596 551 2 534 54 55 43 44 4569 R ELGIN SWEEPER PARTS 15105 • HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 08/23/90 - 00731 . ST MAINTENANCE .' 001-400-3103-4311 00597 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $18.32 9775.96 1C15106 00485 09/05/90 34596 56 5J 50 A5 ELGIN SWEEPER PARTS 15106 08/23/90 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 9767.18 47 48 *** VENDOR TOTAL *•t **** *******************Ii****************************************** $ 7 .9 5. 91 09/06/90 60 til 62 63 49 50 5' R HAl_PRIN SUPPLY COMPANY .. 00946 ... 2 001-400-2_01-4309 00948 $61.65 39587/43482 11217 34597 64 5 66 67 , 52 53 54 MISC. SUPP/FIRE ENGINE 43482 08/28/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $63.57 09/06/90 68 5J 70 ,, ,, .05 57 2 73 74 75 7y, y 3) y y G 3, y .,Y 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:43:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 PAGE 0010 2 3 u1 -I U7/U67/YU PAY VENDOR NAME VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE_ INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP IN 2 3 4 4 5 r, *** VENDOR TOTAL atararxatatat*atx•****+t****ira-tritttait±rtrirxrtttit-w.arttattr±tstitittrtrttititarttitatttttitittr+riti!tt±tirtratt*** $61.60. s 6 l e _ p e R HARBOR CHRISTIAN CENTER 03608 001-300-0000-3115 02980 $3.00 02985 11032 34598 9 ,o 2 ] ,5 PERMIT REFUND/BUS LIC 02985 08/30/90 /BUSINESS LICENSE_ $0.00 09/05/90 * * VENDOR TOTAL #+tirtr;rata*tt#it*t!+qtr*#tta*tt*ttttittEttttjtttititirftttnttttar�tjtttattt*tt�titatttt�tfittttt�titatjtirn�t*ttt�ttt4tt $5.00 R HOZIF_S RADIATOR SERVICE 00277 001-400-2101-4311 00962 $127.30 91004 00702 34599 ,2 ,3 14 s 16 ,l ,6 ,6 RECORE RADIATOR/H'B 3 91004 08/24/90 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $127.30 09/06/90 l ,0 *** VENDOR TOTAL ar>t**at*atarattt: ,. ntt*tr*xat*tt*nirttrtatr*atttatft#• •r*at*#it#tt******?fiat -?Fat#*xtt?ttt*at ** -nit $127.30 20 2, 22 z3 ,9 29 2, R BIG WOK/PENDAR*HSU 03609 001-210-0000-2110 03872 $250.00 00166 11031 34600 22 BANNER m- 25 26 27 - DEPOSIT REFUND 00166 08/30/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 09/05/90 23 24 *** VENDOR TOTAL aF*+FaFa.�raF*wattttFsaF#aF#>EaFaFat>FaFatatttaFaFaF#aFatjFataraFaFaraFa<;F*at;t**aFatt+t�.ttat#*ttaF*aFtt*##tratat.rttraF$250.0031 zs 28 29 30 n R IN?ERNATIONAL CONE OF BLDG OFF ? 00781 `. 001-400-4201-4305 ''00594 ' " `' $63.20 • C161370061836 20 PUBLICATIONS/BUILDING 34601/ 32 4 16137 08/28/90 5.3 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $57.32 09/06/90 zo 3o *afar VENDOR TOTAL •tFaFitatn.�-asataF -ttataFatatttat*-�ttitat-ttatititttatn*attraF n•at-ttit*ittFiF*jFtFat*atatattFitt�-aF*itat;txitatitar3t tt+tatitat 3, $63. 20 36 3, 38 39 33 R INTERTEC COMPUTER SERVICES 01740. 001400-1206-4201" 00756 $2,550.00 4. 34 PRINTER MAINT 7441 0$5 9 062 41 42 43 CONTRACT 7441 08/30/90PROCESSING DATA /CONTRACT SF_RVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 097:/06/90 35 3c *arx VENDOR TOTAL#a<aFaraFaFat*arataraFaFarataF#ataFataF>rat;ta+at***itarata+at rFaF**at**ttar*#aFaFat#ittFat#****at*ataFatar*tFstaF;F $2, 550. 00 3) 45 45 46 l 3p .. .. .. '�. 39 R J C PAPER ' '03083 .001-400-1208-4305 00801 ' $1,011.99 80045460 00174 34603 40 COPIEk PAP'ER'iSfOCK 48 9 50 sz 45460 08/28/90 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4 , $0. 00 09/06/90 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL at*ttarjtarttatattr****tratetar;sariFtrttarit*trariratat+ratrt*art,attrarataratttitatttatararatartriritartt*atarartrartri *** $1, 011.99 4 3 S3 54 ss 44 45 R TAINA*LAHDEKORPI 03600 "' 001-300-0000-3801 02005 - $40.00 58 5, 50 59 4c 1NSF`�cTToN PERMIT REFUND 3152 08/30/90 3152 00619 34604 47 /R/RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION $0.00 09/05/90 48 afar VENDOR TOTAL aFarararaFaraFa<�FarararaFaraFaFa+araFar*arataratar#aratar*arataraFaraFarararataraFaFataFaFararararataFatataFaFatatatatar�t*atatit# $40.00 40 60 6' c2 63 50 .,, .. ... .. ... 5, R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 `: 001-400-6101-4309 0093167 $1, 152. 90 04 45 66 D5583$ 00477 34605 52 CFITIN7�LTY SWING SETS 558°30 08/27/90 PARKS s3 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $1, 152. 90 09%06/90 54 M 6p 6++ l0 1, C:! 72 s 74 • n l% • r 661116. Y NEIL D • • • • • • • • FINANCE—SFA340 5 7 8 9 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 • PAGE 0011 DATE 09/06/90 39 40 4, 42 4 44 45 47 49 51 52 53 54 2 3 5 6 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 ,7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 55 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 59 70 71 72 /3 74 75 6) 6 r✓ r a d' r 1 PAY VENDOR NAME ...,'VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER° TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO # UNENC CHK # DATE EXP 1,152.90 -R *** VENDOR TOTAL ****tray****+ ***prat****************************n*********a************* $1,152.90- RMANHATTAN FORD 00605• 001-400-2101-4311 00961 $172.29 107296/107647 00844 34606 MISC CHGS/AUG 90 07647 03/31/90 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL ************iter******************t a•************************4********* $172.29 $0.00 09/06/90 R MED IMAGING ASSOC OF SO. DAY 02527 ' 001-400-2101-4201 00636 $22.00 69123 00914 34607 1 PRISONER EMERG. SERV 69123 07/16/90 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL**••*******************************k***********************trot********* $22.00 $0.00 09/06/90 R DEAN*MF_NART 02625 001-400-2101-4312 01447 $393.75 00823 34608 MEALS/HOTEL/FTO CLASS 08/21/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL***********t******************************************************** $393.75 $0.00 09/06/90 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC: 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00095 $5,083.99 3661/3658 00488 34609 GASOLINE/CITY YARD /3658 08/23/90 /GASOLINE INVENTORY *** VENDOR TOTAL**'************************************************************* **** $5,083.99 $0.00 09/06/90 • R - VALERIE*MOHLER 00956. 001-400-1202-4316 00318. $76.75 00176 34610 PEIMB BOOKS/FALL SEN 90 08/30/90 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************ter********** $76. 75 $0.00 09/06/90 R MONARCH BROOM 00084 001-400-3103-4309 ' 01039 x$661.84 7757/7755 00847 34611 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 /7755 08/31/90 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************at*********+t***********±r******* $661.84 $0.00 09/06/90 R MOORE RECREATION Y: PARK EQUIP. 03599 001-400-6101-4309 00932 $532.07 5924 00478 34612 SWING SET SEATS/PARKS 5924 08/27/90 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $532.07 $532.07 09/06/90 R NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC 00399 001-400-2201-4305 00382 $54.36 451155 11227 34613 FIRE_ PREV. WEEK PACKAGE 51155 08/15/90 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $45.64 .09/06/90 39 40 4, 42 4 44 45 47 49 51 52 53 54 2 3 5 6 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 ,7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 55 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 59 70 71 72 /3 74 75 6) 6 r✓ r a d' r 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 13:43:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 PAGE 0012 DATE 09/06/90 3 4 6 I 9 o 9 PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 9 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO 4 UNENC CHK 4 DATE EXP *** VENDOR 'TOTAL **************tris*��********•****************************************** $D4.36. R G. *NEIL COMPANIES 03541' 705-400-1217-4305 00019 36.28 0086064.01 10974 34614 LABOR LAW POSTERS 64.01 08/22/90 WORKERS COMP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL **********frit****±**************************#***A**************+k**** ?6. 28 30.00 09/03/90 , R PAK WEST 00519 .. 001-400-4204-4309 01729 3163.52' 721335 00851 34615 , f MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 21335 08/:31/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL **** tit*kit**********************************is**********k************* `$163. 52 $0.00 09/06/90 R PATCO BUILDERS 02977 001-210-0000-2110 0:3875 31,575.00 95547 00560 34616 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 95547 08/30/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL*******-************************************************************* $1,575.00 $0.00 09/05/90 R PETER'S NURSERIES .. .:02367 .'001-400-4601-4308 00423 - . $102.68 - 4147 11352 34617 ' SUMMER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 4147 08/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $102.68 $102.68 09/06/90 • • R PRISON. INDUSTRY AUTHORITY 01030 .001-400--1208-4305. 00803 • 3166.05 12011351 00162 34618 U.S. FLAGS/STOCK 11351 02/27/90 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************it*******is*** $166.05 $0.00 09/06/90 • R FRED*PRYOR SEMINARS, INC. • ' 00298 '001-400-4201-4316 00215 399.00 0726647 00614 34619 SEMINAR REG/C. LOCKHART 26647 08/08/90 BUILDING /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************if•**********:*********it***±t*it*************** $99.00 $99.00 09/06/90 R. RADIO SHACK .01429'`. .°001-400-4201-4305 00595 35.81 027398 00855 34620 f MISC CHCS/AUG 90 2_7398 02/31/90 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ************itis**************************************•**************** $5.81 $0.00 09/06/90 f f • R RIO HONDO COMMUNITY COLLEGE • 01865 001-400-2101-4312 01436 $7.50 X90.1OC 00834 34621 TUITION/K. MITCHELL O. 10C 08/28/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 .09/05/90 f 2 3 6 9 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 a 4, 42 as 45 47 4 5, 53 5q 55 56 57 3 4 5 6 6 0 4t 12 i3 4 - 17 ,6 r ,9 J 20 2, 22 23 .i 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 3, 32 33 34 35 36 37 36 39 40 42 43 A4 45 46 47 9 0 3 6 7 9 2 64 6 66 9 0 2 5 97 4r w 4 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 13:43:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 PAGE 0013 DATE 09/06/90 4) 2 3 .L 9 10 I 12 13 14 15 16 1] le e] 191 J1 20 z1 22 231 Ji 24 25 26 27 28 9 0 3 34 s .✓ 6 3] 1 38 39 qui 0 42 433 O• 5 6 ] O 4A 9 1 V 2 4 5 J ] e 9 2 3 5 68 9 0 0 2 G 0 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT .INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO # UNENC CHK # DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $7.50 R SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION 03428' 001-400-3104-4309 00550 $147.32 237774 00487 34622 PAINT THINNER/PAINT GUN 37774 08/24/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR. TOTAL_******************************************************************** $147.32 $147.32 09/05/90 R SUSAN*SAXE-CLIFFORD,PH D 00839 001-400-1203-4320 00332 $275.00 0-0823-6 10971 34623 PSY'H EVAL/POLICE 823-6 08/23/90 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $275.00 $0.00 09/06/90 ) ] R SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 00151 001-202-0000-2020 01101 $472.98 30018 00035 34624 PRISONER FEES/APRIL 90 30018 08/16/90 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE R SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 00151 001-400-2101-4251 00320 $325.66CR 30018 $0.00 00035 09/06/90 34624 PRISONER FEES/APRIL 90 30018 08/16/90 • POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $147.32 $0.00 09/06/90 ) R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 01728 $95.75 00859 34625 FRCS/AUG 90 08/31/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-6101-4309 00933 - $342.25 $0.00 00859 09/06/90 34625 MST.. CHARGES/AUG 90 08/31/90 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL***************F**************************************************** $438.00 $0.00 09/06/90 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-2201-4305 00383 $18.33 437072 00860 34626 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 90 37072 08/31/90 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $18.33 $0.00 09/06/90 R -SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00080 - $446.00 52353 00243 34627 1305 PPASS SALES/AUG 90 52353 08/28/90 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $446.00 $0.00 09/06/90 R SOUTH BAY BOARD OF REALTORS 03614 001-210-0000-2110 03874 $100.00 97141 00559 34628 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 97141 08/30/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 09/05/90 1 i 4) 2 3 .L 9 10 I 12 13 14 15 16 1] le e] 191 J1 20 z1 22 231 Ji 24 25 26 27 28 9 0 3 34 s .✓ 6 3] 1 38 39 qui 0 42 433 O• 5 6 ] O 4A 9 1 V 2 4 5 J ] e 9 2 3 5 68 9 0 0 2 G 0 FINANCE—SFA340 TIt1E 13:43:52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 ' PAGE 0014 DATE 09/06/90 3 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # • ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 1 , 5 e *** VENDOR TOTAL *xtris•tt****tt •un***** t****+rit•it****w,t****tittr+ irirtr****+rir+.+it±t******** rttx: *** $100.00. s 6 7 8 7 0 9 R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL ` 00107 001-400-2101-4201 00635 3522.97 8625867/35323 00913 34629 9 0 ,2 4 12 PRP OTTER—EME= . E ' ICES 35:23 08/21/90 POLICE_ /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/06/90 ** VENDOR TOTAL jt*srtrirsrtrxi±n'ittr•irtr•ftatttttttart!*jrtrtr+.tirairtrtrar+tn•itxtt*ir+rtt•trir*ittttttritit'tr****trat*?t******trait $522.97 '3 14 15 16 13 la 15 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT • 00400 ' 110-300-0000-3302 ' 35771' $277.00 00...25 .78 34630 w 18 i0 20 2i 22 23 24 i5 7 18 CTTATION COUR r DAIL 08/30/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 09/06/90 "arty VENDOR TOTAL #it*iritic.p.3:irx.p.xm.;t*x* ..y.{...a.+.•x.n.p..n.x*.y.#ir##ir*#tr#it#####'r##C•####'k##ir*****###it#tr 5277. 00 9 . 20 21 .. R SOUTHERN CAL. TREE & LANDSCAPE 03416 001-400-6101-4201 00196 $2,227.50 00460 34631 —FIELD—SEI 25 26 27 26 29 30 31 32 22 23 24 EL`JC? V/VALLEY 07/17/90 PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $2,227.50 09/06/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL a ********.•,•. ,•.+.,._. ,.*..jtx•ir****x****v*** tori!•tra•*****•irttjr*it•rirtrit*±rtr******** *** 52, 227. 50 25 . 25 27 R SOUTHWEST REG TRAINING CENTER . `01909 • 001-400-2101-4312 01446 $223.00 OOEi._4 34632 33 34 35 36 20 29 30 lUIi10N/D. MENART 08/21/90 POLICE • /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 09/06/90 *** VF_ND0R TOTAL ir*n�ttttrtr***n�tt�t�**ir**tt•tt*air•tr3t*�rirtrtt*•a.tr�tttir�rarttat•Marx•tttrtrtrirttirtrtttrtr* -*ar*it-trt±* •tr*tt$23.00 523. 00 37 30 39 40 31 32 33 R SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146- 001-400-4601-4305 00862 • 553.29 ' 0744839 00033— 34633 41 42 43 34 35 36 QTTER COOLER RENT/JUL 90 44839 07/31/90 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/06/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL -tt*?r****arar***irar**sr** •**stat*tr#*****t+x**#k#x# •,y. •xar###***#a.#*?r-u tit**# -**tr* $53. 29 44 99 46 47 46 37 3 0 30 P. SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 03158 001-400-4601-4308 00422 3327.00 SUMMER 11361 34634 49 50 40 41 42 fOV SUI'IMER PROGRAM UMMER 08/20/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 3327.00 09/06/90 trartr VENDOR TOTAL at'tartratttatatattrar3rirtr• ttu�r tr•ntrit�t tr#•�tirtr�a•trtr;cit•�rirn•attr jrxirtratarntrttir•�t�riatt at tt *trttir+ttt 53:_7. 00 551 2 53 54 55 43 44 45 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 ' 001-400-3103-4309 01038 $38.61 38418H 00868 34635 Misc. 66 57 659 0 61 62 63 45 47 48 49 50 51 CHARGES/AUG 90 8418H 08/31/90 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/06/90 *** VENDOR TOTAL tt*trtr*at•ntt*tt •jtirt�*�tir�tu.-trirrrn�rtta*tri tra�t�t•rcttttarx•frtr•�rtrt! �rsttrirtttttr+tit;t*tt �taa�r�t*•ntti!trxjr�t•n$38.61 538. 61 '• • R CITY OF*TORRANCE 00841 001-400-2101-4251 00319 $64.50 " 101613 00068 34636 rklsuNER- II^CT-10 /JUL '90 01613 64 65 66 67 70 71 -.3 S4 08/14/90 POLIO C(NTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 30.00 09/06/9066 56 7z 74 75 J J • • yJ y. 0 Sfr •L I _I 2 6 1 2: 2 2: 2. 2 2 2 3 3 3i 3 31 3' 41 4 43 4a 4, 46 47 49 5, 54 55 56 i FINANCE-SFA340 • CITY OF HERMOSA REACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 • PAGE 0015 DATE 09/06/90 o 2 m sn PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # DATE INVC ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # - AMOUNT INV/REF PROJ 41 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PO # UNENC CHK # DATE EXP *?t# VENDOR TOTAL **i ********************************** **************c*************** 564. 50 P. VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY COMPANY 01934 001-400-2201-4309 00946 512.81 • 2481797 •- A 90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS f**************'tit********************* 512. 81 00671 50.00 34637 09/06/90 FTTSC. CHAP c,, - ' o *** VENDOR TOTAL ****#******6r***** ************ R VERNON PAVING COMPANY 00019 001-400-3103-4309 01037 561.89 15723/15722 08/31/90 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ******************************************** 561.89 00872 50.00 34638 09/06/90 MTS77—CHAKUES7TUG 90 15722 8 *42' VENDOR TOTAL ********* *4 *** ******* R WEST COAST MAPPING 03539 001-400-4101-4305 00459 5850.00 10859 34639 I' LCIDLT NOTICING/PI_ANNINo 08/23/90 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL ****its:***********4r***************x******gar***********************x** 5850. 00 55830.00 09/06/90 R WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY ` 00141 001-400-1131-4201 00601 : 567.80 54715236 09348 34640 PULL_ICATTONS/CITY CLERK 15236 08/02/90 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *prat VENDOR TOTAL_ #******Frit*********************************************************** 567. 80 50.00 09/06/90 R SALLY A. *WHITE 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00272 5374.00 08/28/90 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *s* 5374. 00 10860 50.00 34641 09/06/90 .ScC 18ER'V/AUG 0 ,90 *** VENDOR TOTAL *******************•********•****•*************••u•******************. R WHITLOW EMERGENCY MEDICAL GRP 03457 001-400-2101-4201 00633 $65.00 325-905856 00916 34642 PRIMREP EMERG. SERVICES 05356 R WHITLOW EMERGENCY MEDICAL GRP 09/08/90 03457 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 001-400-2101-4201 00634 5175.00 325-905226 50.00 00915 09/06/90 34642 PRISONER EMERG. SERVICES 05226 07/16/90 -*** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************* POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *8* ****** nit*****ti ********* 5240. 00 50.00 09/06/90 R MARK *WRIGHT 00133 001-400-2101-4312 01445 577.25 00829 34643 MEALS/CAREER SEMINAR 08/22/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 09/06/90 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 J., J• J, J' '-5 V' • • J J J r L FINANCE—SFA340 TIME. 13:43:52 CITY OF I IERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/11/90 PAGE 0016 D=.lE 09/06/90 ) 0 2 PAY VENDOR NAME VND tl ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF PO ,n CHK DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP * it VENDOR TOTAL *********************************4 ********************************* $77. DD ' =` '* PAY CODE TOTAL*ir*****************a*******************it*******air***tr************* $74, 693. 11 r uw* TOTAL WARRANTS iririrx iririltriririri<xiriri!xiri:iririrxiririririri:-it=isiririr;ti:•iri<t� iriftririrtrirttiririrtrtr i:it•t s*;fi,�,•ri; $75, 019. 63 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS /OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGGE TpTc �/INCLUSIVE OF THE WARRANT—REOISTER-FOR—`7L LJ �ARE ACCUR*TE AND FUNDS •RE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT THEREOF: BY _' / iDATE FIrvAN EEA/Dtt INNISTRATOR 7/t! 9D ,4 3 3 D 1 " 1 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 ) , ) te 2 3 3 3i 31 er 41 43 45 45 4) 40 49 A 51 52 53 54 55 55 -3 1\ 3 5 6 16 1) 18 19 1 20 2i z2 23 24 25 z6 2) J 28 29 0, J 2 3 4 6 ) 0 9 0 2 3 -, 3 5 "e 6 9 d! 6 G0 2 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council September 6, 1990 City Council Meeting of September 11, 1990 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS September 25, 1990 Proclamation for Rideshare Week Approval of air conditioning bid for Police Department Pay phone agreement Chamber of Commerce request for sidewalk sale Oct. 12 & 13 Approval of proposal for feasibility analysis of City Yard sites Fire Assocation MOU amendment MAX pass 1 7/24 Possible procedures to expedite Council mtgs. and clarify citizen input opportunities 8/14 Prepare RFP for curbside recycling CIP 88-406 Call for Bids - Sewers Target Area 4 Approval of contract amendment - workers' comp consultant Pavement Management Report Further review of 4/10 schedule Approval of agreement with County for overlay of Valley/Ardmore/ Prospect Approval of a joint powers agreement for compliance with AB939 - State Recycling Law Responsible Agent City Manager Public Safety Director General Services Director Community Resources Public Works Director Personnel Director Planning Director City Mgr./City Clerk Building Director Public Works Director Personnel Director Public Works Director Personnel Director Public Works Director Building Director Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Hearing Appeal of Planning Commission approval of 3 -unit subdivision at 588 - 20th Street October 9, 1990 Implementation of no left turn sign- ing on 30th St. at Ardmore Ave. Slurry sealing, call for bids CIP 89-170 Final report of Cable TV Board 5/16 Review of 4 -hr. no parking restriction for sweeper 8/13 Caltrans letter re. PCH peak parking Public Hearing 3rd Quarter General Plan amendments Housing Element revision Revised Park Master Plan October 23, 1990 5/3 Energy Conservation report Award construction contract for basketball courts Fee recommendations resulting from User Fee Study 8/14 Municipal Pier modifications Public Hearing Appeal of Planning Commission denial of CUP for motorcycle repair at 640 P.C.H. Text amendment to allow outdoor display in commercial zones November 13, 1990 Public Works Director Planning Director Public Works Director Public Works Director General Services Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director Community Resources Dir. Building Dir. Public Works Director Finance Director Community Resources Dir. Planning Director Planning Director Pedestrian jogger crossing mid - block at Greenbelt intersection Public Works Director January 8, 1991 7/30 6 mo. review of Farmers' market Community Resources Dir. ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Public Works Director Vehicle parking on pedestrian streets Public Works Director Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council 5/8 Discuss financial arrangements on oil project City Mgr. Council 5/8 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project Planning Dir. Goal 2 5/16 Options to direct dial to City Hall Gen. Svcs. Dir. Goal 4 5/16 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function Goal 8 City Mgr. Council City Mgr. 5/16 Options to increasing service level of street sweeping 7/24 3 -hr. vs. 2 -hr. parking meter limit in the downtown (refer to VPD) 7/24 Review Rule XV & parking fees for employees in 6 months 8/20 Gann limit - Appropriations subject to Council 8/14 Review of standard CUP conditions Council 8/14 Obtain consultant's review of Cable Co. ascertainment Finance Dir. Public Works Dir. Gen. Svc. Dir. Personnel Dir. Fin. Director Planning Dir. Gen. Svc. Dir. Council 8/14 Review ways to enforce no parking in front yards City Mgr. 8/22 Joint meeting with Chamber of Commerce City Mgr. 9/4 Recommendation on Council Chamber chairs Planning Dir. City Manager Finance Dir. f Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council September 5, 1990 City Council Meeting of September 11, 1990 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of August 1990. Respectfully submitted, 6/ Gary Brut ch City Treasurer NOTED: 'Kevin Northcrafr City Manager ld INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - AUGUST 1990 DATE OF INVESTMENT DATE OF MATURITY INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 8/01/90 Investment Investment Withdrawal BALANCE 8/31/90 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way BALANCE 8/01/90 Withdrawal BALANCE 8/31/90 $2,010,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 <100,000.00> $2,510,000.00 Account $ 690,218.52 <354,029.75> CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: Union Federal S&L Investment City National Bank Investment City National Bank Investment 336,188.77 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 8/06/90 8/09/90 2/22/90 3/23/90 4/25/90 8/21/90 2/21/91 3/25/91 4/22/91 8.517% 8.42% 8.10% 8.425% 8.50% CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment $ 500,000.00 5/19/88 5/20/93 9.10% U.S. TREASURY BOND: Investment $ 500,937.94 2/22/89 1/31/91 9.20% Investment $ 499,326.42 1/03/90 12/31/91 7.71% Investment $1,025,032.92 1/29/90 2/15/91 8.22% Investment $1,001,542.12 3/06/90 2/29/92 8.50% Investment $ 500,845.79 3/08/90 2/29/92 8.50% Investment $ 999,492.83 4/20/90 3/31/92 8.763% Investment 1,019,779.01 5/14/90 2/15/93 8.49% FHLMC: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment $ 248,733.64 3/26/87 3/1/17 8.0% INVESTMENT TOTAL $10,417,879.44 SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 7/01/90 BALANCE 7/31/90 $ 516,905.08 516,905.08 8.625% TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO. BALANCE 6/30/90 BALANCE 6/30/90 TRUSTEE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL $ 10,711.04 10,711.04 $ 527,616.12 $10,945,495.56 Respectfully Submitted, /4// 77://261 Gary Brut City Treasurer September 4, 1990 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL September 11, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #21305 (C.U.P. CON NO. 89-18) LOCATION: 634 FIRST STREET APPLICANT(S): BOB CONGER REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A 2 - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #21305 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #21305 at their September 19, 1989 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: / ,/ Michael Schubach Planning Director Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager r T/srfinmap Respectfully submitted, en Robertson Associate Planner 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #21305 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 634 FIRST STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on September 11, 1990 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300)_ of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 89-69 adop- ted after public hearing on September 19, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24. 25 26 27 28 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #21305 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 149, Walter Ransom Company's Venable Place, as recorded in Book 9, Page 150 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 634 First Street, Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: T/rsfinmap PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this llth day of September, 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 August 30, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council September 11, 1990 EASTER SEALS LEASE AGREEMENT RECOM4MENDATION It is recommended City Council approve the attached lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Easter Seals Organization. BACKGROUND Easter Seals presently leases Rooms 14, 16 and 17 in the Community Center. They have been a tenant in the Center for the past 12 years. They teach independent living skills through community access and community resources to disabled young adults so they may learn how to become more self-sufficient. ANALYSIS The lease space for Rooms 14, 16 and 17 is 2,760 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $2,125 ($.77 sq. ft.) The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental policy (approved by City Council on March 19, 1990) with all other conditions of the former lease remaining the same. Their residency in the Community Center has been of great value in helping individuals in the South Bay area. Concur: l Mary . °ooney, Director Dept of Community Resources Kevin B. Northc,r'aft City Manager Respectfully Subm ted, Marsha rnst Administrative Aide Dept. of Community Resources Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department 1f HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 11th day of September 19 90 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Easter Seals Organization (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One (1) year commencing on the 1st day of_ October ,1990 , and ending on the 30th day of September ,19 91 . 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Rooms 14, 16, and 17 (2,760 sq. ft.) 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent accord- ing to the following schedule: October 1, 1990 thru June 30, 1991: $.77 per sq. ft. or $2,125.00 per month. July 1, 1991 thru Sept. 30, 1991: $2,208 $.80 sq. ft. Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of teh following month. 1 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Teach pre -vocational and in- dependent living skills to disabled young adults and for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary. to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of 2 such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di- rect or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the Lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS_ AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 3 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Easter Seals 151 Kalmus Drive Suite H-10 Costa Mesa, CA 926 Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. ATTEST: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By MAYOR CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: 5 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR September 4, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 11, 1990 SIDEWALK REPAIRS, CIP 89-142 ACCEPT AS COMPLETE Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Accept as complete Sidewalk Repairs, CIP 89-142 performed by Damon Construction Company at a cost of $347,497. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion. 3. Authorize staff to: a) Release the retention payment to Damon Construction Company. b) Release Damon Construction Company from the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond. Background: On February 13, 1990, City Council awarded a contract in the amount not to exceed $328,064 to Damon Construction Company. On July 10, 1990 the City Council approved increasing the project contract amount with Damon Construction Company from an amount not to exceed $328,064 to a new not to exceed amount of $348,064. (Allowing the proposed $20,000 from the FY 1990-91 CIP Budget to be added to this sidewalk repair contract). This project repaired significantly damaged sidewalk areas, curbs and gutters at various locations throughout the City. Analysis: This section is divided as follows: 1. Construction A. Project Constructed According to Specifications B. Time Schedule C. Notice of Completion D. Release of Bonds E. Construction Costs 2. Inspection 3. Fiscal Impact and Project Accounting - 1 - lg 1. Construction A. Project Constructed According to Specifications The staff recommends acceptance of the work as complete. The project was constructed according to the specifications prepared by the staff. B. Time Schedule Below is a summary of the project time schedule: Start Date Completion Date for Areas A, B, C, and D (The project was stopped to reassess the additional costs due to added work not found in the original 1988 field review.) Council approved contract increase to complete the project in Area E Construction Resumed Contract Completion Date Contract Time Expended Adjusted Contract Time Allowed April 16, 1990 May 14, 1990 July 10, 1990 August 6, 1990 August 16, 1990 40 Days 90 Days The project was completed within the adjusted contract time schedule. C. Notice of Completion Staff recommends City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a Notice of Completion. The signed Notice of Completion will be recorded with the County Recorder's Office. D. Release of Bonds Pending City Council authorization; after the Notice of Completion is recorded, staff will release Damon Construction Company from the obligation of the following bonds: Faithful Performance Bond Bonding Company Original Bond Amount Amount to be Released Bond No. Labor and Materials Bond Bonding Company Original bond amount Amount to be Released Bond No. Fireman's Ins. Co. of Newark, N. J. $298,240.00 $298,240.00 159-24-25 Fireman's Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J. $298,240.00 $298,240.00 159-24-25 Also pending Council approval; the retention payment, in the amount of $ 34,749.70, will be released to Damon Construction Company thirty (30) days after recordation of the Notice of Completion (provided no stop notices or mechanics liens are received within that time period). E. Construction Costs Below is a summary of construction costs for the project: Original Contract Amount Quantity Adjustments Final Construction Cost $298,240.00 49,257.00 $347,497.00 Contract not to Exceed Amount $348,064.00 Amount Under: $ 567.00 2. Inspection All inspection on this project was performed in-house utilizing City engineering staff. 3. Fiscal Impact and Project Accounting This project was 100% funded with the General Fund. Since all design and inspection was performed in-house, internal costs are not shown. Therefore, all project costs shown are construction contract costs only. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Do not accept construction as complete. Respectfully Submitted, Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance pwclerk/srcipl42 ynn A. Terry Deputy City Engineer Ant -o y Antich Director of Publ evin B. Northc'aft City Manager September 5, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 11, 1990 UPDATED APPRAISAL FOR SOUTH SCHOOL Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council table this matter indefinitely. Background: This item was originally presented to the Council at your meeting of August 28, and deferred to the following meeting, which is September 11, 1990. Analysis: The updated appraisal, for which proposals were previously re- quested by the City Council, is to be used for further negotia- tions with the School District as well as the possibility of con- demnation proceedings. In recent weeks, it appears that the City and School District are making progress and are close to an agreement on the purchase of the South School site by the City. Accordingly, it seems ap- propriate to put the updated appraisal on hold until the purchase discussions are either finalized or at a stalemate. This will potentially avoid the City incurring the cost of the updated ap- praisal, which is $3,750. KBN/ld cc: City Attorney 1i September 4, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 11, 1990 APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CIP 89-512 BASKETBALL COURTS AT CLARK FIELD Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve plans and specifications for CIP 89-512, Basketball Courts at Clark Field and authorize staff to advertise for construction bids on this project. 2. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary. Background: On February 13, 1990, City Council awarded a professional services agreement to Harris & Associates at a cost not -to -exceed $7,480 for the design of the basketball courts. On July 25, 1990 the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommended the following: 1. Review and recommend approval of the plans and specifications for CIP 89-512, Basketball Courts at Clark Field, to the City Council. 2. Recommend to the City Council that additional local funds from CIP 89-506, the Park and Recreation Facilities. Tax Fund, be approved to provide the lighting for the courts. This project proposes to install two full-size basketball courts immediately north of the tennis courts at Clark Field based on recommendations of the Commission. The site was formerly used as a bowling green but has not been used for that purpose for approximately ten (10) years. Analysis: The plans and specifications havebeen prepared by Harris & Associates. They are complete, available for review in the City Clerk's office and ready to go out for bid. Engineer's Estimate: The consultant has estimated the cost for this project as follows: Design $ 6,800 Construction 59,500 Subtotal $ 66,300 Court Lighting 36,000 Total $102,300 Inspection on this project will be performed in-house. Fiscal Impact: The approved Grant Fund amount for this project in the 1989-90 fiscal year budget was for $58,000 which has been carried forward to the 1990-91 fiscal year. Shown below is a potential funding scheme for this project. Note that only the $58,000 is currently budgeted. Per Capita Grant No. 88-1-19025 Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris Grant No. BB -190384 1986 Community Parklands Grant No. 86-1-19095 CIP 89-506 (1) Unfunded (2) Total $58,000 7,181 4,128 11,200 21,791 $102,300 (1) This amount is anticipated to be available assuming. $19,800 is expended on fencing at various locations. (2) Potential funding sources are: Park and Recreation Facilities Tax Fund ($59,390 available). General Fund, Designated for Capital Improvements ($39,907 available). After construction bids have been received and the construction costs are known, additional funding or limiting the scope of work may be required if the actual funding is insufficient. Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Delay the project. 2. Modify the scope of the project. 3. Delete the lighting. This would reduce the project cost by approximately $36,000. Respectfully submitted, Brian Gengler / Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal mpact: Viki Copeland Finance Director ty/bas Concur: 47;45-l-/-7? Lynn A. Terry Deput City Enginee I /iM '_J! A oily Antich Director of Pub is Works <E,d, Mary oo Comm nity Resources Director Kevin B. Northci'aft City Manager August 29, 1990 City Council Meeting September 11, 1990 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 90-1045- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 5-9 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE" "Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 90-1045, relating to the above subject." At the meeting of August 28, 1990, this ordinance was introduced by the following vote: AYES: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Respectfully submitted, Concur: Kevin B. orthc =ft, City Manager 1 ORDINANCE NO. 90-104S 2 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 5-9 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. 4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES 5 ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 6 SECTION 1. Section 5-9, Chapter 5, of the Municipal Code of 7 the City of Hermosa Beach is hereby amended to read as follows: 8 SECTION 5-9. BOATING. 9 (a) No person shall operate any vessel within three hundred 10 (300) yards of the shoreline of the beach except when necessary in 11 taking it to or from its lawful mooring place or when necessary in 12 the case of emergency. The distance from shore as specified above 13 shall mean the distance measured at right angles to the tangent 14 of the actual line between the water and the unsubmerged beach as 15 it exists at the time of measurement. 16 (b) No person shall launch any motorized vessel from the 17 beach. 18 (c) A violation of subsection (a) or (b) shall be an 19 infraction. 20 SECTION 2. That this ordinance goes into effect thirty days 21 after the date of its adoption. 22 SECTION 3. That prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days 23 after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this 24 ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper 25 of general circulation published and circulated in the City of 26 Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. // 27 // 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which time the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS nth day of September, 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk 2 • September 9, 1990 FROM: Concerned property owners and residents of 9th, IOth, and Ilth Street who feel they will be adversely affected by the proposed Mobil Car Wash and Gas Station Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council: We the undersigned property owners and residents living on 9th, IOth, and 1lth Street, west of Pacific Coast Highway, near the proposed Mobil Gas Station and Car Wash are hopeful the City Council of Hermosa Beach realize our concerns and understand all the implications such an over developed site plan will have on our residental neighborhood. Please find attached a two page copy of our areas of concern submitted to Council for the June 12th meeting.: Once again attached to this appeal to reconfirm our concerns and hopefully to be reconsidered by all council members. We are hopeful that when you are considering approval of any part of the' Mobil proposal and when preparing to issue a CUP that our residental neighborhood has not been compromised for this commercial development. NAME ADDRESS 9-6121_662(14_, 721. 1 >G ---- /y 6"/(1_,CIVU-e (dk cc..y ..c J/4-/ 7-z� /6 k /3 / 73/ - 9 2 . -� 771-.C: ry -7 '3Z. c' `73 P) SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 FROM Concerned property owners and residents of 9th, IOth, and Ilth Street who feel they will be adversely affected by the proposed Mobil Car Wash and Gas Station NAME .L2/7a‘66- ---777/yAA 2 ADDRESS 9)) 6m1 0,&1_6( J/7.3, 5.1 ) . 8- rh 6t c116. S21: 4B c14 T f--( .4) /c) cit ( f — 1 (774 , �.;5 - jc 11- — September 9, 1990 FROM: Concerned property owners and residents of 9th, IOth, and Ilth Street who feel they will be adversely affected by the proposed Mobil Car Wash and Gas Station Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council: We the undersigned property owners and residents living on 9th, IOth, and 1lth Street, west of Pacific Coast Highway, near the proposed Mobil Gas Station and Car Wash are hopeful the City Council of Hermosa Beach realize our concerns and understand all the implications such an over developed site plan will have on our residental neighborhood. Please find attached a two page copy of our. areas of concern submitted to Council for the June 12th meeting. Once again attached to this appeal to reconfirm our concerns and hopefully to be reconsidered by all council members. We are hopeful that when you are considering approval of any part of the "Mobil proposal and when preparing to issue a CUP that our residental neighborhood has not been compromised for this commercial development. NAME pz./4/l/iG . 7-6K:-//)( - �l,�r<(L EAS )c kso. 1 v 6eKi L a � &76.5e oreyy.) ogeQT8A/ETA s '/((G -L -GGA ADDRESS /DSS r 46-m/-m/,/76gC'l. -. 9d)-3-( )0 V) L- n•'l. O A (')( U t`" e7/ ` i/ 7 c35 -)i's)- 7:?/ )l=s) ?�/l'�Srio YV f/. /3 ,;2 0^7 c0: -s '6 -sr C FROM' NAME Concerned property owners and residents of 9th, 10th, and Ilth Street who feel they will be adversely affected by the proposed Mobil Car Wash and Gas Station ADDRESS/!" ,7-0/ 7 5 1 -1-4111t 4"4:-(k eCZ L)r_tY( ( MA7 dzI/e/61,Age gat,a 7 3 / 7/V 4' Me /o'er( (A\--\ Oel,L,X,1-5,t4s• t)e-SY M{-bL)7- M 7)V5Q__ 1 _la' 101 -115<\ /(3 (, o dzi/o7 ef '21r1-' c4 z.. \e's 5L-) • June 12,J990 FROM: Concerned residents living adjacent or near the proposed Mobil Car Wash and Gas Station Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Over the last six months, as near by residents to the proposed Mobil Car Wash and Gas Station, we submitted a great deal of material in subport of our position that in many ways we were to be adversely affected by the proposed development of the Mobil Car Wash and Gas Station. We are hopeful1 you were prpvided all the materials we submitted and had an opportunity read them. Now that the proposed Mobil Car Wash and Gas Station plan is up for review by the City Council we hope that both our previous and most recent concerns would be taken into account by the City Council by ammending the site plan or CUP 89-5. In review and to once again establish our position let us more specifically indicate our areas of concern. 1. The planning Commission modified Staff's recommendation and reduced the buffer area on the south entraace driveway on 9th Street to just 10 feet from the westerly property line rather than the 16.5 feet. Anything less than 16.5 feet is felt to impose a constant hardship and hazard by those entering or exiting that residence's driveway. That distance of 16.5 would be a minimum to provide a safe buffer from those exiting the mobil site. 2. In review of the design plan by Mobil when the addition pumping island was added to the plan submitted in December of 1989 the site arrangement looked hlghty congested and overly developed. No other gas station site that has been viewed has 4 islands and l6 pumping stations. Then to add a Car Wash to that which will generate stacking problems from cars entering and exiting the Car Wash itself when reviewed many spill over problems may arrise that will have to be absorbed by the residential neighbors. Also a mini -mart is at that site. A plan of this magnitude should be on a large shopping center corner not at a location such as this that abuts a residental neighborhood. We feel that there should be only 3 islands instead of 4 at that site. The Car Wash is the catalyist of our concerns we see it impacting our residental neighborhood by I. Added traffic on 9th, 10th and Ilth by those who could not proceed in a direction permitted from the PCH exits at the site. 2. Added noise from traffic, the car wash itself, cars waiting to enter the car wash and those who exited the car wash to then dry their cars. 3. 'Health concerns from car emmissions because of the drive-thru car wash. 3. In review of CUP 89-5 there were no hours of operation established for the gas station and the mini -mart. The Plan Commission indicated it may 24 hours. We would hope that I;00 a.m. would be its hour to closk.and 5:00 a.m. to open. The sale of alcoholic beverages at the mini -mart we would hope would not be permitted and we feel that a statement to that fact is necessary in the CUP. August 30, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council September 11, 1990 HISTORICAL SOCIETY LEASE AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council approve the attached lease agreement between the City and the Hermosa Beach Historical Society for Rooms 7 and 6D. BACKGROUND Since 1987, the Historical Society has been leasing Rooms 6D and 7 in the Community Center. To date, the City has granted them this use free of charge. Room 6D (117 square feet) is utilized for storage while Room 7 (1,100 square feet) serves as a museum and meeting place for Historical Society activities. Since 1988, Room 7 has also been available as a meeting space for community groups and events. ANALYSIS The Historical Society has requested to retain the free use of the Rooms (attached) and have made a further request to enter into a longer lease term than one year. Staff recommends that the one year term remain in force as alternative locations for the group may arise in the future. In accordance with the rates set by Council, the lease subsidy provided by the City for the two Rooms would total $937 per month ($90 for Room 6D and $847 for Room 7). While this is substantial, it reflects an opportunity cost only if the room would be leased by a non-profit agency should the Historical Society vacate. Currently there are no such requests. The Historical Society needs space to display their items; a space to conduct meetings and tours and a place to hold special events. While Room 7 is meeting this need, it may be prudent to explore innovative locations for displays throughout the City during the next year so that the efforts of the Historical Society may be enjoyed by more visitors and members of the community. Clearly the Historical Society provides an important community service in seeing that Hermosa Beach's past is preserved for the benefit of present and future generations. Housing them in City facilities will do much to insure that this important organization remains viable and active. Other alternatives available to Council include: 1. Deny lease renewal 1 1 0 2. Change terms of the lease: Charge full or partial lease rates to the Historical Society. 3. In lieu of the full use of Room 7 offer display areas throughout the City (i.e. the City Council Chambers, Community Center and City Hall) and meeting space free of charge in the Community Center (retain 6D for storage). 4. Select an alternative location (i.e. Prospect School House) for the group. 5. Offer a month to month lease that would/could be terminated with 30 days notice if a request for lease space comes to the Department from a non-profit agency. Respectf ly Submitted, Mary . '°ooney, Director Dept "of Community Resources Noted: Kevin B. Norther' aft City Manager Noted for Fiscal; Impact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department CITY MANAGER COMMENT: My recommendation is to develop with the Historical Society a plan for alternative display areas and use of City meeting and storage rooms as needed. This will increase the visibility of the group's displays and efforts and increase City revenue when Room 7 is rented (Alternative #3). It would be appropriate to allow the Historical Society to remain in Room 7 until the end of the calendar year in order to allow for implementation of this plan. This alternative allows the City to continue to provide strong support for the Historical Society's efforts in preserving the history of Hermosa Beach while insuring the use of leasable space in the Center is maximized. 2 Hermosa Beath Eisforiral 5aciefg 71II Pier .kcnue irrmvsu E¢ttrh, oA 913254 Mary Rooney, Director Department of Community Resources City of Hermosa Beach August 28,1990 The Hermosa Beach Historical Society requests renewal of their lease for Room 7 in the Community Center. We would also ask that the City consider a lease term longer than one year. Our three neighboring cities of Torrance,Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach have supported their historical societies by providing rent free facilities on city owned land in return for the benefits provided to the citizens of their cities. We hope that this tradition may continue in Hermosa Beach. It is our desire to be responsive to the needs of the city and we hope that in the long term to provide a benefit to our community far in excess of the rental value of the space provided by the city. I have enclosed our Statement of Purpose and an activities summary.A representative of the Historical Society will be available at the council meeting to answer any questions or receive any input regarding our mutual interest in the history of Hermosa Beach. Respectfully submitted, Rick Learned, Director HERMOSA BEACH HISTORICAL SOCIETY STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The purpose of the Hermosa Beach Historical Society is to bring together those people interested in history, espe- cially in the history of our community. Understanding the history of our community is basic to our democratic way of life, gives us a better understanding of our state and nation and helps us better to appreciate our American heritage. The society's major .function will be to discover and collect any material which may help to establish or illus- trate the history of the city: its settlement, development, and activities in peace and in war; its progress in population, wealth, education, arts, science, trade, and transportation. It will collect printed material such as histories, genealogies, biographies, descriptions, directories, newspapers, pamphlets, catalogues, circulars, handbills, programs, and posters; manuscript material such as letters, diaries, journals, memoranda, reminiscences, rosters, service records, account books, charts, surveys, and field books; and museum material such as pictures, photographs, paintings, portraits, scenes, relics, and material objects illustrative of life, conditions, events, and activities of the past or the present. The society will provide for the preservation of such material and for its accessibility, as far as may be feasible, to all who wish to examine or study it; co-operate with officals in insuring the preservation and accessibility of the records and archives of the city and of its institutions. The society will disseminate historical information and arouse interest in the past by publishing historical material in the newspapers or otherwise; by holding meetings; by marking historic buildings, sites, and trails; and by using the media of radio and television to awaken public interest. The society will co-operate with other historical societies to collect and preserve materials of state-wide significance so that these materials can be made available to students and scholars. Hermosa Beach Historical Society Activities Summary 1989 March Assisted the Chamber of Commerce in planning an Oldtimers luncheon honoring many long term residents and businesses. April Director Reznichek participated in several meetings with leaders other community organizations and a consultant hired by the city to develop a master plan for community resources. May Volunteers worked at the Historical Society booth at the fiesta during Memorial Day weekend.Over 200 people visited the booth to view our collection of historic photos and learn more about the history of Hermosa Beach. June Additional display cases were purchased and new displays organized. July General membership meeting to approve bylaw revisions requested by Internal Revenue Service, and to view new exhibits in the museum. August Sites and Walk committee organizes historical walks down Pier Avenue. October Members collected information and prepared first newsletter to be mailed to membership. Speakers were arranged for the November meeting. November Over 50 people attended a meeting at the Community Center and were entertained with a display of historic police badges and historic film footage of Hermosa Beach. Hermosa Beach Historical Society Activities Summary 1990 January Members and Directors attended a Tri -Cities mixer hosted by the Manhattan Beach Historical Society. February Director Learned gave a presentation about Hermosa Beach history at a Rotary Club luncheon March Annual Meeting attended by over a hundred members at the home of Hugh and Kathleen Gardner.Former resident Mary Kellog returned to the home for the first time in thirty years. Directors were elected for the following year. April Historic photos were displayed at the Kiawanis Club and an informative talk about the Historical Society was given by Historical Society member Matt Dottson. May Third grade students from Hermosa Valley School were given a tour of the Museum by Directors Learned, Webber and Carr. July Members attended a Tri -City Historical Society mixer hosted by the Redondo Beach Historical Society. August The Manhattan Beach Historical Society hosted our members to a tour of their recently completed Museum and Historical Center. HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 11th day of September 1990 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and H. B. Historical Society (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One (1) year commencing on the 1st day of October ,1990 , and ending on the 30th day of September ,1991 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 6D Storage Room 7 Meeting Room and Museum 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: Rental fee waived. Historical Society will open room 7 for public meetings and it can also be used for rental. Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. All plans for the remodel of Rooms 7 and 6D shall be approved by the following City Departments prior to work being done: Department of Public Works, Department of Building and Safety and Fire Department. 2. Lessee's name shall be placed on tenant sign board. 3. Room 7 shall encompass 1,078 square feet only. 4. All window dressing shall receive approval of the Department of Community Resources prior to installation. 5. Fire inspections shall take place on the premises. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Storing, cataloguing, displaying of historical artifacts and related Historical Society events. And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; 2 (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written .notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di- rect or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the Lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and 3 risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Hermosa Beach Historical Society c/o Mr. Rick Learned 635 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 4 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: September 6, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the,Hermosa Beach City Council of September 11, 1990 RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE ON CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES Recommendation: To approve a resolution and ordinance reflecting a strict policy on dealing with licensed and permitted businesses in which con- trolled substance offenses have occurred, and providing for revo- cation proceedings observing due process protections. Background: Mayor Roger Creighton has discussed with the cities of Redondo and Manhattan Beach a coordinated program for strict enforcement of controlled substance related offenses occurring in licensed and/or permitted businesses in the South Bay. These discussions followed the Council meeting of May 3, 1990, where "zero tolerance" was reported by staff as the policy for these offenses. At the Council meeting of July 24, 1990, the City Council direct- ed staff to prepare and submit an appropriate resolution and or- dinance to reflect this policy. Analysis: The attached ordinance, which is ready for introduction, has been prepared by the City Attorney and reviewed by our City staff. It will provide a procedure for revocation of business license where illegal activities have been documented. Staff wishes for the Council to be aware that, while revocation of a business license will have a significant and appropriate negative impact on ille- gal operations, it will not prevent new licensees from operating the business. The attached resolution is similar to that being considered by the other two cities and will document the broad policy statement of our City Council regarding substance abuse in our licensed and permitted businesses, as well as throughout our community. Both documents, when adopted and approved, will help reflect our City's strong sense against the national epidemic of controlled substance abuse, and its reflection in our local community. Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager cc: City Attorney City Manager, Redondo Beach City Manager, Manhattan Beach 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE REVOCATION AND SUSPENSION OF BUSINESS LICENSES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Section 17-21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 17.21. Revocation and Suspension of Licenses. Any license issued under the provisions of this title is issued and used by all parties receiving or using the same subject to the express condition that the City Council may revoke or suspend the license or impose new conditions in any of the followings instances: A. Where the City Council finds and determines that the preservation of the public health, safety and peace demand revocation of such license or permit; B. Where the licensee or permittee has violated any provisions of this code, any ordinance of the city or any other provision of law; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C. Where a permit or license has been granted on false or fraudulent evidence, testimony or application; D. Where the licensee or permittee has violated the terms and provisions of such license or permit; E. Where the licensee has conducted the business in an immoral or disorderly manner, or has failed to exercise reasonable efforts to maintain order among the customers and patrons and to prevent violation of law or ordinance by them; or F. The business has been conducted as to be a public nuisance. G. By the license collector, where the licensee has failed to pay the charges imposed by .this chapter or to file reports as required by this chapter within sixty (60) days after such charges or reports become delinquent. Section 2. Section 17-21.1 is hereby added to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: "Section 17-21.1 Revocation or Suspension Hearing. No license shall be revoked without giving the holder thereof an opportunity to appear before the City Council and be heard 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in his own behalf. The City Council or City Manager may initiate such revocation proceedings and shall cause a notice of such hearing to be given to the holder of such license at the address set forth in the license application of the time end date of the hearing at least _ ]ihe days before the hearing. At the time set for the hearing or at the date to which the hearing may be continued by the City Council, the holder of the license may be heard and may present any facts to show why such license should not be revoked, and the City Council shall hear statements from other persons who may attend the hearing and present reasons why the license should or should not be revoked, and may, if it so desires, place under oath and question any person before it. At the close of the hearing, or at any time within thirty days thereafter, the City Council shall determine from the facts produced at the hearing, and from any other facts in its possession whether or not the license should be revoked, and shall make its order accordingly and may make such order conditional upon the doing or not doing of any act by the holder of the license or his agents or servants, which the City Council 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 deems for the public good. On the revocation of the license, all license fees shall be forfeited to the City. Notice of such revocation shall be given to the license holder by the City Clerk. A license may be suspended for such time and subject to such conditions as the City Council may impose in the same manner and for the same reasons that a license may be revoked. From and after the revocation or suspension of said license by the City Council, such license shall be null and void and no business shall be conducted - or operated in any manner during any period of license revocation or suspension." Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after 30 days of its final passage and adoption. Section 4. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause the summary to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1990. President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENABLING ELECTED COUNCILMEMBERS TO ENSURE THAT ALL EFFORTS ALLOWED BY LAW ARE FULLY EXERCISED IN ORDER TO CONTAIN, CONTROL AND PROHIBIT THE ILLEGAL SALES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES. WHEREAS, increasing illegal sales of controlled substances present a hazard and detriment to our cities, the justification for this action is apparent and self-explanatory; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City staff is hereby directed to inform the City Council whenever some_..dru.a related activity, within the City limits, results in a criminal conviction. The purpose of this notice is to enable the City Council to initiate or to authorize the appropriate Board, Commission or official to initiate revocation proceedings, allowable by law, for the revocation of any business license, zone variance or Conditional Use Permit where a conviction of a 'drag related offense has occurred with respect to the operation of the business or the pursuit of the land use entitlement. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original records of the City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1990. By President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 2 Honorable Chairman Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: APPELLANTS: LOCATION: PURPOSE: September 4, 1990 Regular Meeting of September 11, 1990 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-5 COUNCILMEMBERS MIDSTOKKE AND WIEMANS 931 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - MOBIL OIL CORPORATION APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE REPLACEMENT OF AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION/SNACK SHOP WITH NEW GASOLINE PUMPS, A SNACK SHOP AND A SELF-SERVICE AUTOMATIC CAR WASH Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends approval of the request as modified to move the 9th Street driveway ten (10) additional feet to the east, with a recommended additional condition that a "no right turn" sign be required at the driveway exit. Otherwise the Planning Commission recommends approval of the request pursuant to their initial approval as contained in P.C. Resolution 90-1, which includes four pump islands. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the project be reduced to a maximum of three (3) pump islands, but otherwise to concur with the Planning Commission by adopting the attached resolution. Background At the meeting of June 12, 1990, the City Council considered an appeal of the Planning Commission approval of the' subject request. The Council referred the decision back to staff and the Planning Commission to consider: 1) moving the driveway on Ninth Street to the east, away from the residence to 16 feet; 2) eliminating the fourth set of pumps; 3) including a traffic study of the ingress and egress for both customers and tankers; 4) doing an additional study to determine nighttime noise levels; and 5) considering a no right turn and/or stop sign on Ninth Street. On August 7, 1990, the applicant submitted a traffic study of the intersection, a sound study of nighttime noise levels, and a revised plot plan showing the relocation of the Ninth Street driveway to the east, to 16.6 feet from the residence. At their August 21, 1990 meeting, the Commission considered the Council's suggestions changes and concurred with the proposed adjustment of the Ninth Street driveway location and also recommended adding a requirement for a "no right turn" sign at the Ninth Street driveway. However, the Commission continues to recommend approval pursuant to the previous Planning Commission resolution, which included allowing four (4) pump islands. Also, the Commission recommended that the applicant more thoroughly respond to Council requests for supplemental traffic and noise studies, noting that the supplemental information submitted did not appear to completely respond to Council's request. Analysis Staff is recommending reducing the number of pump islands to three because the applicant has not provided adequate justification for the four pump islands. A fourth island could be supported, perhaps, if the applicant provided evidence that the size of the site could support the four islands and a car wash and also accomodate the expanded auto and tanker truck traffic. The applicant has been aware of the Council's concern about the fourth set of pumps, and has failed to adequately respond. The applicant has been informed of staff's concern as well, and may attempt to respond prior to the Council meeting. Otherwise, given the absence of such information, reducing the project to three pump islands will serve to mitigate some of the concerns of Council. As such, staff is recommending the addition of a condition to limit the project to three pump islands. Also, the attached resolution includes added conditions that the Ninth Street driveway be a minimum of 16.5 feet from the westerly property line, and that a "no right turn" sign be provided. HOURS OF OPERATION The Planning Commission approved the project with a condition that the car wash could only operate from 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. Monday through Friday, and from 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. on weekends and holidays. Gasoline sales, and snack shop sales, however, could occur 24 hours a day. According to the applicant this would be a continuation of the current use of the property, while some nearby residents have given conflicting testimony that this station may have never been open 24 hours a day. To clarify this discrepancy, staff has verified with the Police Department that this station has been open for 24 hours in the past, although not on a consistent basis. For additional analysis please refer to the the attached Planning Commission Staff Report for 8/21/90. This includes - 2 staff's analysis of the applicant. CONCUR: Mich.eI Schubach Planning Director, new information submitted by the Associate Planner Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. P.C. Staff Report 8/21/90 3. P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 4. C.C. Minutes 6/12/90 5. Correspondence since 6/12/90 6. P.C. Resolution 90-1 7. Applicant submitted supplemental traffic & sound studies a/pcsr931 CITY MANAGER COMMENT: I support the three island limit as it will reduce the number of cars queuing up for the car wash. If the applicant is correct that gas is an impulse purchase, then one less island should not result in more cars waiting for gas, since drivers will tend to drive on if islands are full. The compromises reached and stringent conditions recommended pro- vide a good balance of community commercial and residential needs. They will improve the current protection of residential uses from negative commercial impacts. Approval is recommended. - 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW A SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH IN CONJUNCTION WITH GAS SALES AND A RETAIL SNACK SHOP AT 931 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 11 THROUGH 17, INCLUSIVE, TRACT 223. WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on June 12, 1990, and September 11, 1990, on appeal of the decision of the Conditional Use Permit to receive oral and written testimony and made the following findings; A. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings to review this request on January 3, and February 20, March 20, and May 1, 1990, and through this process has satisfactorily responded to and addressed the concerns of staff and the surrounding residents; B. The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing service station and to replace it with new facilities to support a gasoline station including gas sales, a retail snack shop and a self-service car wash; C. The automatic car wash will be equipped with a pure water rinse system rather than a blow dryer system, ..which reduces the noise impact to insignificant levels in conformance with the City's noise ordinance; D. The proposed use, as conditioned, is compatible with surrounding commercial and residential uses and will not cause a significant impact on the environment; E. The parking and stacking areas on the subject lot are adequate to support the proposed uses; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 F. The proposed use complies with the zoning ordinance and is consistent with the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby concur with the Planning Commission decision to approve a Conditional Use Permit and Negative Declaration to allow a self-service car wash in conjunction with gasoline sales and a retail snack shop at 931 Pacific Coast Highway subject to the conditions of P.C. Resolution 90-1 and the additional conditions No. 26 through 28 listed in complete form as follows: 1. The location of structures and features on the property shall be in substantial conformance with submitted plans; any modification shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. 2. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 3. The exterior of the business shall be kept in a neat and clean manner at all times. Daily sweeping and cleanup is required. 4. The car wash shall be a coin-operated self-service facility for customers and shall be automatic. No employees shall be retained on the premises for the purpose of drying, vacuuming, or detailing washed vehicles. 5. Blow dryer systems shall be prohibited. 6. The operating hours for the car wash shall be limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. on Mondays through Fridays and from 8:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on weekends and holidays. 7. No self-service vacuum cleaners shall be located on the site. 8. No automobile repair service shall be conducted on the site. 9. Retail merchandise, except for gasoline, shall be displayed and sold from the interior of the building only. 10. An eight (8) foot high wall, shall be provided along the westerly property line adjacent to the residential property to the west. The wall shall be constructed of decorative split block and shall be designed to maximize sound attenuation subject to review and approval of the Planning Director. The wall shall not exceed 42 inches in height for a distance of 10 feet from the edge of the right-of-way for both 9th Street and 10th Street. 11. The existing 45 -foot pole sign, located at the southeast corner of the site shall be removed. Only one pole or ground sign is permitted on the site and said sign shall be limited to 10 feet in height and shall have a decorative base or pole cover reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12. A complete sign plan shall be submitted, including dimensions and copy, to the Building Department for approval prior to the installation of any signs on the site. 13. A back flow prevention device shall be installed to prevent spilling of wash water on the site. 14. A water reclamation system, approved by the County of Los Angeles, shall be utilized. 15. The use of non -biodegradable detergents or waxes shall be prohibited. 16. Waste material shall be disposed in accordance with local, state, and federal laws and shall not be allowed to drain into the City's storm drains. 17. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's noise ordinance and shall not become a nuisance. (a) Complaints from residents shall constitute a nuisance 18. A sign shall be installed at the exit of the automatic car wash informing customers that no stopping is permitted for drying of cars and that cars shall proceed off the site or to a marked parking stall. Material and wording of sign shall be approved by the Planning Director. 19. Three (3) copies of a revised site plan and landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits, depicting the following: (a) Two additional parking spaces to meet the minimum requirement of six (6) (b) The air and water facilities shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from the rear property line, and shall not violate the noise ordinance. (c) The trees to be provided along the westerly property line shall be planted at intervals of ten (10) linear feet on center. Low maintenance trees shall be planted, and there shall be no nuisance created by such trees. (d) Existing mature trees of six (6) inches in diameter or greater shall be identified on the landscape plan and shall be maintained on the site. (e) The southerly entrance driveway shall be located a minimum of ten (10) feet from the westerly property line, as measured along the southerly property line and shall be a width of 35 feet. (f) A stacking lane shall be clearly marked for cars waiting to use the car wash with a capacity of five (5) cars. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12' 13. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (g) Said stacking lane shall not interfere with the required turning radius for the parking stalls. The trash dumpster and the storage building located in the rear of the lot shall be relocated away from the west property line to a location acceptable to the Planning Director. 20. Outdoor lighting shall be located and oriented to direct light and glare away from adjacent residential properties. 21. A manager or clerk who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. 22. Any violation of the conditions and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach. Municipal Code shall be grounds for an immediate revocation hearing and/or citation. 23. Any changes to the exterior or interior design shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 24. Prior to the conditional use permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 25. The Planning Commission may review the conditional use permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 26. The maximum number of islands for dispensing gasoline shall be three (3). 27. The Ninth Street driveway shall be located a minimum of 16.5 feet from the westerly property line as measured along the southerly property line. 28. A "no right turn" sign shall be provided at the Ninth Street driveway exit, the size and type of which shall be approved by the Public Works Director. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Met,14_ CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -7- a/pers931 84 C/ OR OUND A?/ITER/4L Honorable Chairman Members of the Hermosa Beach. Planning Commission August 9, 1990 Regular Meeting of August 21, 1990 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-5 LOCATION: 931 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - MOBIL OIL CORPORATION PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER CITY COUNCIL SUGGESTED CHANGES TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE MOBIL OIL SERVICE STATION REFERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION BY CITY COUNCIL Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the proposed change to move the Ninth Street driveway ten feet east, and to add a requirement for a "no right turn" sign at the Ninth Street driveway, but otherwise to continue to recommend approval pursuant to the previous Planning Commission resolution. Also, staff recommends that the applicant more thoroughly respond to Council requests for supplemental traffic and noise studies. Background At their meeting of June 12, 1990, the City Council considered an appeal of the Planning Commission approval of the subject request. The Council referred the decision back to staff and the Planning Commission to consider: 1) moving the driveway on Ninth Street to the east, away from the residence to 16 feet; 2) eliminating the fourth set of pumps; 3) including a traffic study of the ingress and egress for both customers and tankers; 4) doing an additional study to determine nighttime noise levels; and 5) considering a no right turn and/or stop sign on Ninth Street. At their meeting of May 1, 1990, the Planning Commission granted the subject Conditional Use Permit subject to several conditions as contained in the attached Resolution. This decision was made after conducting public hearings and discussion at four separate Planning Commission meetings. The Planning Commission modified staff recommended conditions by requiring an 8 -foot wall rather than 6 -feet along the rear property line, requiring a stacking lane for 5 cars rather than 8 cars, and to off -set the south entrance driveway 10 feet from the westerly property line rather than 16.5 feet. Analysis The scope of the Planning Commission review of this referral is to determine whether or not the changes suggested by the Council are acceptable. A revised plan has been submitted which moves the 35 -foot wide driveway 10 feet to the east. This satisfies the concerns noted -8 - by the Council relating to the location of the driveway on Ninth Street. Although it would be preferable to maintain the maximum possible off -set from P.C.H., the Public Works Department indicates that this revision is acceptable. Staff is recommending that a "no right turn" sign be provided on the south driveway, as suggested by the Council, to reduce traffic on the local street, and to discourage the use of this local street for customers with further destinations. Unfortunately this would force local residents of Ninth Street and vicinity that use this station to exit on to P.C.H. and then turn down Ninth street. The revised plans indicate the originally proposed four (4) pump islands as previously approved by the Planning Commission. The islands have been shifted three feet to the north to provide adequate clearance from the relocated driveway. The applicant has not provided any further justification for keeping the 4 pumps in response to the Council's concern. In staff's judgement the site is adequate in size for the 4 pump islands, and this feature should facilitate moving customers through the station to prevent stacking. The applicant has also provided additional information in regards to traffic impacts which. supports previous information provided by the applicant, and further notes that gaps in the flow of P.C.H. traffic are frequent enough to support the egress movements that would be generated from this project. This study, however, does not address ingress movements into the site, tanker truck traffic, and the effect a no right turn sign on the 9th Street exit would have. Additionally, the applicant has provided noise measurements for the hours from 12:00 A.M. to 5:00 A.M. These measurements are of the noise levels which currently exist due to the operation of the 24-hour station, and the background noise from P.C.H. The study does not project noise levels that the expanded operation might cause, nor the potential reduction of noise from the installation of an 8 -foot high sound wall. Staff believes that the amount of additional noise should not be significant, and that the 8 -foot wall should actual y i:,prove the current condition. CONCUR: Michael Schub ch Planning Director Attachments 1. C.C. Minutes 6/12/90 2. Resolution P.C. 90-1 3. P.C. Minutes 5/1/90, a/pcsr931 I/ _/J /1LJ Mr/ 'rS On Associate Planner Father Alex addressed the Commission and described the improvements which have be made to the property since last May. He also noted that he has met with the neighbors ixV attempt to solve various problems. Public Hearing closed at 11:26 P.M. by Chinn. Ketz. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Moore, to approve staffs recommendation, Resolution P.C. 90-67, as written. AYES: Comms. Moore, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ketz NOES: \None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Ingell RESCISSION OF THE APPROVAL OF A NEW ELECTRONIC MARQUEE AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER (CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF AUGUST 7. 19901 / Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated July 31, 1990. Staff recommended rescission of the sign waiver by adoption of the proposed resolution. / The Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation requested a sign waiver to install a new marquee at the northeast corner of the\Community Center property, replacing the existing sign. The PlanningCommission approved a sign waiver at their June 6, 1990, meeting. \ The Foundation was unable to secure the corporate sponsorship necessary to fund construction of the marquee and resolved to replace or repair the. old sign with a non -electronic marquee. At the June 26, 1990, meeting, the City Council referred this matter to the City Attorney for appropriate action to repeal the waiver. According to the City Attorney,/it is a matter of rescinding., the sign waiver; therefore, staff prepared the necessary resolution. Hearing opened at 11:28 P.M.'. by Chinn. Ketz. i Howard Longacre addressed the Commission and said he is happy that the sign is finally being rescinded, since it is/actually nothing more than a large, moving billboard. Hearing closed at.,,1/1:29 P.M. by Chinn. Ketz. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Moore, to approve staffs rcommendation, Resolution P.C. 90-65, as written. AYES: : / Comms. Moore, Peirce, Rue, Chinn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Ingell CUP 89-5 -- TO CONSIDER CITY COUNCIL SUGGESTED CHANGES TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE MOBIL OIL SERVICE STATION AT 931 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (REFERRED BACK FROM 6/12/90 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated August 9, 1990. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission concur with the proposed change to move the 9th Street driveway ten feet east and P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 to add a requirement for a "no right turn" sign at the 9th Street driveway, but otherwise to continue to recommend approval pursuant to the previous Planning Commission resolution. Staff further recommended that the applicant more thoroughly respond to Council requests for the supplemental traffic and noise studies. At their meeting of June 12, 1990, the City Council considered an appeal of the Planning Commission approval of the subject request. The Council referred the decision back to staff and the Planning Commission to consider: (1) moving the driveway on 9th Street to the east. away from the residence to 16 feet; (2) eliminating the fourth set of pumps; (3) including a traffic study of the ingress and egress for both customers and tankers; (4) doing an additional study to determine nighttime noise levels; (5) considering a "no right turn" and / or stop sign on 9th Street. At the meeting of May 1, 1990, the Planning Commission granted the subject conditional use permit, subject to several conditions as contained in the proposed resolution. This decision was made after conducting public hearings and discussion at four separate Planning Commission meetings. The Planning Commission modified staff -recommended conditions by requiring an eight -foot wall rather than six feet along the rear property line, requiring a stacking lane for five cars rather than eight cars, and to offset the south entrance driveway ten feet from the westerly property line rather than 16.5 feet. The scope of the Planning Commission review of this referral is to determine whether or not the changes suggested by the Council are acceptable. A revised plan has been submitted which moves the 35 -foot wide driveway ten feet to the east. This satisfies the concerns noted by the Council relating to the location of the driveway on 9th Street. Although it would be preferable to maintain the maximum possible offset from P.C.H., the Public Works Department indicates that this revision is acceptable. Staff recommended that a "no right turn" sign be provided on the south driveway, as suggested by the Council, to reduce traffic on the local street, and to discourage the use of this local street for customers with further destinations. Unfortunately, this would force local residents on 9th Street and vicinity that use this station to exit onto P.C.H. and then turn down 9th Street. The revised plans indicate the originally proposed four pump islands as previously approved by the Planning Commission. The islands have been shifted three feet to the north to provide adequate clearance from the relocated driveway. The applicant has not provided any further justification for keeping the four pumps in response to the Council's concerns. In staffs judgment, the site is adequate in size for the four pump islands, and this feature should facilitate moving customers through the station to prevent stacking. The applicant has also provided additional information in regard to traffic impacts which support previous information provided by the applicant, and further notes that gaps in the flow of P.C.H. traffic are frequent enough to support the egress movements that would be generated from this project. This study, however, does not address ingress movements into the site, tanker truck traffic, and the effect a "no right turn" sign on the 9th Street exit would have. Additionally, the applicant has provided noise measurements for the hours from 12:00 AM. to 5:00 A.M. These measurements are of the noise levels which currently exist due to the operation of the 24-hour station and the background noise from P.C.H. The study does not project noise levels that the expanded operation might cause, nor the potential reduction of noise from the installation of an eight -foot high sound wall. P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 —/0— Staff felt that the amount of additional noise should not be significant and that the eight -foot wall should actually improve the current condition. Hearing opened at 11:31 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz. Brian Recksteiner, 3800 West Alameda, Burbank, representing Mobil Oil, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that the project has again been redesigned to mitigate certain problems; (2) discussed the problem with the driveway on 9th Street, stating there is now a distance of 16 feet, six inches, between the driveway and that of the neighbor's; (3) passed out a letter to the Commissioners related to egress; (4) discussed the traffic study, stating that the letter addresses this point; (5) said that the traffic signal phasing will handle the traffic; (6) said that the "no right turn" sign on 9th Street was a mitigation measure to protect the neighbor, but now that the driveway has been redesigned, he did not feel the "no right turn" sign is necessary; (7) stated that he has read the staff report and has no objection other than that related to the "no right turn" sign. Mr. Recksteiner, in response to questions from Comm. Rue related to the letter, explained that the traffic study was done based on four islands. He stated that 124 vehicles can enter and leave the station during each one-hour period. He noted, however, that they are projecting only 36 vehicles per hour; therefore, they do not see any problem. Mr. Schubach stated that based on the figures. staff does not consider this to be an overdense project and therefore recommended four islands. He noted, though, that staff had thought there were only going to be three islands; however, the fourth island has always been designated on the plans. Mr. Recksteiner addressed the confusion between the three versus four islands. He explained that they had always planned on having four islands. He said most of the other service stations in Los Angeles are 150 by 150 feet, or 22,500 square feet. This particular location is unique in that it measures 28,655 square feet. He stated that with the reconfiguration of the driveway, there is now room for the fourth island, as was always planned. Mr. Recksteiner handed out maps of the proposed site and continued to explain the placement of the islands and canopy. He stated that Mobil standards include a four -island facility; however, in substandard conditions, only three islands are installed. Mr. Recksteiner, in response to questions from Comm. Rue regarding the landscaping, stated that the landscaping plans have not changed, other than the enlargement of the planter between the station and the neighbor. Comm. Moore discussed the fact that the proposed car wash will not have blow drying. He asked what drivers actually do when they exit and their cars are wet. He felt that this could create confusion because people would assume that the blowers were broken. Mr. Recksteiner stated that some people get out and dry off their windshields and drive away. He noted, however, that since pure water is used in the wash cycle, it dries almost instantly. Howard Longacre addressed the Commission and: (1) pointed out that the Council has made no final decision on this matter at this point; (2) discussed the issue of drying and stated that people will be confused when their car is not blown dry and noted concern that people will stop to get out and dry their cars; (3) stated that this will be a massive gas pumping station with no changes other than the alteration in the driveway and the suggestion that a "no right turn" sign be installed; (4) stated that once people exit onto P.C.H., they will probably stay on the highway; (5) said that the issue is not islands, it is the number of pumps. and he urged the Commission to address the number of pumps; (6) said that Mr. Recksteiner is a paid lobbyist, and he felt that citizens do not realize the impact this station will create; (7) displayed several photos depicting another similar Mobil station in Long Beach, and he asked several questions related to the photos. P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 //_ Mr. Longacre continued and: (1) noted concern that many cars will stack and leave their engines running while waiting to enter the car wash; (2) discussed the layouts depicted in the photos at the other Mobil station; (3) noted concern over the number of pumps which will be installed; (4) discussed the average car length and stated that they will be strung across the service station property, noting that the proposed lot is not huge; (5) disagreed with the applicant's statement that gas is an impulse purchase; (6) said that getting one's car washed is sometimes addictive, and he noted that most people going into the car wash have clean cars. Mr. Longacre went on and: (1) discussed the firm that conducted the traffic study, stating that he felt they did not include enough information; (2) commented on several issues raised in the traffic study; (3) strongly opposed the proposed 16 pumps on four islands; (4) stressed that this service station and snack shop with 24-hour operation will create a huge impact in the city; (5) stated that the peace and tranquility of the surrounding neighborhood will be destroyed. Wilma Burt, 1152 7th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that the neighbors strongly favor the "no right turn" sign from the station onto 9th Street; (2) asked when it was ever approved that this station could operate 24 hours a day; (3) stated that 24-hour service creates noise problems to the neighbors; (4) said that no other businesses in the area operate 24 hours a day; (5) opposed 24-hour operation. Mr. Schubach, in response to questions from Comm. Peirce regarding the 24-hour operation, explained that this station did not require a conditional use permit when it first opened. He said that the applicant asserts this station has been operating 24 hours a day for quite some time, with the exception of one short period. Gloria Kolesar, 714/726 10th Street, addressed the Commission and: (1) supported the lengthening of the driveway; (2) felt that a stop sign would help; (3) discussed the traffic study and commented on several of the points in the report; (4) stated that the car wash impact should have been included in the traffic study as well as the pumps; (5) noted concern over the 24-hour operation and the new sign on the highway advertising this fact; (6) noted concern over four pump islands at the station, recalling that the initial proposal called for only three islands; (7) noted concern over potential stacking while people wait to enter the car wash; (8) discussed traffic circulation patterns at the station; (9) asking whether there are any criteria for overdevelopment. Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that preventing cars from stacking will lessen the air pollution; (2) suggested that the area be modified so that cars do not pile up with their engines running. Parker Herriott, Hermosa Beach, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that the City Council informed the applicant that they could have only three islands; (2) noted concern over the 24- hour operation, especially as related to safety issues; (3) stated that his queries to Mobil regarding number of pump islands have not been answered; (4) opposed the car wash, stating that it will create too much car stacking and congestion; (5) noted concern over the emission of gas fumes while cars wait; (6) urged the Commission to protect the citizens; (7) noted concern that the noise study makes no mention of late-night noise in the residential neighborhood; (8) asked how much money will be generated from this service station; (9) stated that there have been discrepancies between what he has been told by the applicant and what he has been told by other Mobil representatives. Howard Longacre addressed the Commission and noted concern over the gas pumps and snack shop being open 24 hours per day. Comm. Peirce discussed idling cars at the station and asked how Mobil reconciles that with their stand on preventing air pollution. P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 Brian Recksteiner stated that the car wash takes only one minute. He noted that testimony has centered on other stations which use the blow dry cycle, which adds an additional minute and a half to the cycle. Comm. Moore noted that even if the wash cycle takes only one minute, there must be an allowance made for cars pulling in and out of the area for the car wash. Mr. Recksteiner did not have information related to the specific cycle time, taking into account the entrance and exit of the cars. He stressed, however, that the wash cycle itself takes only one minute. Hearing closed at 12:25 A.M. by Chmn. Ketz. Comm. Moore felt that there will be unending problems with traffic at this location during peak hours. He also felt that there will be customer relation problems, noting that no air dry will be provided for the car wash. Comm. Moore questioned the marketing effect of this proposal, stating that the car wash with no drying cycle could create public relations problems. Comm. Moore stated that 24-hour service is used throughout the service industry, noting that there is actually less crime at 24-hour businesses because most crime occurs as a business is opening or closing down. He felt that a 24-hour service station is a convenience that this city should offer. He noted, however, that there is no doubt that there will be additional noise and light to the surrounding area. MOTION by Comm. Moore, seconded by Comm. Rue, to approve the plan as submitted at this time, with the inclusion of a condition that a "no right turn" sign be posted at 9th Street. Comm. Moore noted, however, that he felt that such a sign would be ineffective and would turn people into lawbreakers. Comm. Rue noted that much public testimony has been heard on this matter. He said that he has nothing further to add, noting that the project has been studied quite thoroughly. Chmn. Ketz noted concern over noise and 24-hour service. She noted that no project noise level information was presented related to the increased noise levels since this station is being increased four -fold. She stated that she would favor three islands as opposed to the proposed four. She also favored the condition requiring that a "no right turn" sign be installed on 9th Street, as well as the condition that the driveway on 9th Street be moved away from the residence 16 feet. Comm. Rue questioned whether having only three pump islands would actually improve the situation, to which Comm. Moore responded that having only three islands would produce more traffic jams during heavy periods, and it would have no effect at all during the late-night hours. Comm. Rue did not feel that three islands would create a dramatic improvement at the site. Chmn. Ketz questioned what impact the fourth island would have on the amount of business coming into the station. Comms. Peirce and Moore agreed that the fourth island would indeed create more traffic coming into the station. Comm. Rue felt that the fourth island would reduce the car stacking. - /3 - P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 Comm. Rue questioned how noise levels could be projected if the 24-hour station is notin operation. He commented that information has been provided for a twelve -pump operation, but noted that information was not provided for a sixteen -pump operation. Comm. Moore stated that there is no doubt a 24-hour operation will create noise at night; however, he noted that the city has a noise ordinance • Chmn. Ketz, discussing the hours of operation, noted that the hours have been restricted for the car wash operation; however, no restrictions were placed on the gas station use. Comm. Rue asked whether more information could be obtained related to the effects of 24-hour operation and the mitigation effects of the trees and the eight -foot wall, to which Mr. Schubach replied that the consultant could be requested to provide such information. Chmn. Ketz suggested that the request be made so that the information can be presented to the City Council, rather than requiring this issue to come back before the Planning Commission. Comm. Rue stated that he could support an amendment to the motion to require additional information related to the projected noise levels and the impact to the neighborhood created by the 24-hour operation. Comm. Moore noted that this issue must go forward to the City Council. He therefore felt it is unnecessary to require a request for additional information in the body of the motion. Comm. Rue suggested that a projected noise study for the 16 pumps and the 24-hour operation be made prior to the City Council meeting. Chmn. Ketz agreed. Comm. Moore could not support such an amendment to the motion, stating that the noise very late at night will be minimal. He stated that late at night there will not be a great deal of traffic. Comm. Rue noted, however, that the operation will have a convenience store. He noted that people will be leaving entertainment establishments late at night, and they will go into the convenience store. Comm. Moore felt that further information is unnecessary, stating that the applicant knows what the City Council wants. Chmn. Ketz stated that she could support approval of the motion; however, she noted strong concern over the four pump islands and the 24-hour operation of the business as related to the attendant noise impacts. (Vote on Comm. Moore's motion to approve the request as submitted with the requirement that the "no right turn" sign be posted at 9th Street.) AYES: Comms. Moore, Rue, Chmn. Ketz NOES: Comm. Peirce ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Ingell STAFF ITEMS.. a) Communication Regarding 16O Manhattan Avenue. Bayview Sanitarium This item was continued to the next meeting because of the lateness of the hour. b) Tentative Future Planning Commission Agenda No -action taken. P.C. Minutes 8/21/90 Action: To re -adopt Ordinance No. 90-1031 Mo ion Mayor Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered./ 3. ITEMS\ REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items (b) (h), (j) and (k) were discussed at this time but are li ed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Jim \ Lissner, 2715 El Oeste dated June 6, 1990 regarding Maphattan Grande Plaza'. (Requested by Councilmember Esseitier.) Addressing the Councii..on this it eii were: Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste p ive Wilma Burt,.1152 Seve\ thStreet Action: To direct staff `t6 initiate a meeting with Manhattan Beach staff to /try to implement the three points suggested by the /City\ Manager: (1) attempt to find ways to mitigate he traffic impact on Hermosa-. Beach areas from the purrent project, (2) find ways to mitigate the traffic mpact:on Hermosa Beach areas from any future projec s, and (3) determine a working arrangement to ensure intra -city cooperation in future projects. The staff meeting should \include the City Managers, Planning Directors, and Public' Works Directors for both Cities, with arrangements for a possible future meeting of both City Councils. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Creighton. So ordered. Further/Action: To hold a Council discussionith the City Attorney in closed session concerning althrnative actions if the staff meeting with Manhattan Beach does not/reach a satisfactory agreement. Motion Wiemans, second Mayor Creighton. So order noting the objections of Sheldon and Mayor Creighton. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON MOBIL STATION, CAR WASH AT 931 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, with resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 4, 1990. Supplemental letter from Howard Longacre, dated June 11, 1990. Planning Director Schubach presented a staff report and responded to Council questions. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak against the appeal were: /S - Minutes 06-12-90 Brian Rechsteiner, Territory Manager for Mobil Oil Company of 3800 West Alameda Avenue, Suite 700, Burbank, CA 91505-4331, as the applicant Jerry Newton, 2041 Circle Drive Coming forward to speak in favor of the appeal were: Parker Herriott, 224 - 24th Street, who submitted a written copy of his comments. The meeting recessed at 9:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened to at 9:10 P.M. The public hearing was continued. Coming forward to speak in favor of the appeal were: Wilma Burt, 1152 Seventh Street Shu Miho, 731 Ninth Street Sam Lennox, 845 Tenth Street Jim Lissner, 2715 El Oeste Drive Gloria Kolesar, 714 Tenth Street Sybil Hess, 647 Ninth Street Maurice Bouday, 1203 - 11th Street The Public Hearing was closed. Proposed Action: To grant.the appeal, thereby overturn- ing the Planning Commission decision and denying the application. Motion Wiemans, second Essertier. No action. Substitute Action: To refer the decision back to the Planning Commission and staff to consider: 1) moving the driveway on Ninth Street to the east, away from the residences, by approximately sixteen (16) feet; 2) eliminating the fourth set of pumps; 3) including a traffic study of ingress and egress for both customers and tankers; 4) doing an additional study to determine the nighttime noise levels between 11:00 P.M. and 5:00 A.M.; and 5) considering a no -right turn and/or stop sign on Ninth Street. Motion Mayor Creighton, second Midstokke. So ordered, noting the objection of Sheldon. Further Action: To continue the public hearing to the regular meeting of September 11, 1990. Motion Mayor Creighton, second Sheldon. So ordered. 6. CONSIDERATION OF RE-CREATION OF A SEPARATE VE$IC- PARK- ING DISTRICTTBOARD AND FUND, with two ---ordinances for introduction. Memora-ndum from nance Director Viki Copeland dated June 4, 12g`O: CSupplemental letters from Glenda Sitnek of d-eFCT impressions Inc: ,_.dated June 7, 1990; from e-eene Frost of Coast Drug, dated`June-10, 1990,;_ -aid from Jack Wood of Triad Design Associates, received June 11, 1990. -16- Minutes 06-12-90 -Mr& 1171Ls s-rx)7vr rt)/ L t36 40 477719env--Nil IS'iN T w (C.(, f)11 Narli N(r 7a //6-9-iyi o.S ft /U 0779/__ S Is (=oo; )7- Is A 41 /7:/ pm -7- 7»is /s f} Lftect- SCT6'- 71r 1-0e19 Pm) 19-8147 Rbs t 77/9 L P0 -5-1\r17 k VS I O -f\177 6( 0710 7-6 N RT OK! 77 -Ps ((crwr -a 1 qc / 1 / R -mo NV7 / P MPS is 7)o eropvY e Po P- )s Pcd-v. 71_4 1N -3--b rs of piAm('S ) NcT rsLANAs. - -Vlc C (A)7)S1f IS v-tvb1-161\. 77h -Or IV( (.b 6-2,67F- I T) IF is LOW 6RS /7(2%7 NOT / 4 N/0" yY) nl y /N 77-ir 62 6`) /VOW • IF f)(.l.owb— Stl u -r c- C -PIR 1,0)s>1 boo Rs Ev 771r I-I04s CF 6P6V--f 72A) 6F 6- 12( ST /%N, 7 /941 - JI Pill is P c.b-iv n, N(61—p7( 4e77/7-? ///'6 2 67/ UI P1 DYE G/1sOL-/&11,-"i 6AS CLI0609 910 -1 f/11 00; Com /A/6 e ° vie IA)/ fir (9fiin f 6"))) tt VLif _19_1),kSld�/� ,�v�s/�� PvaPI 'sw/`/ /( '/ /12 r7V /,kJ -- 5'o m 6 :A 'CL `Tb �,!J�-r .down/ �h 6 � WA/7-AJ 30 ill/I O -6S. �o No -7- ()t o) SI61\)S' �c7 Sl7y Fi2gg- 19NY /^/h -17_ A[iG 2.1 1990 No. Entree 1 1 Economy Wash Wash Wax Dry • 2 Deluxe Double Wash Wash Wax Dry With Gasoline Fill -Up (8 Gal. Minimum) FREE No Gasoline Purchase $2.99 $.49 $3.49 3 Premium Wash $.99 $3.99 Foam Bath Hot Wax Dry 4 The Works $1.99 $4.99 Wheel Scrub Foam Bath Hot Wax Dry PLEASE PURCHASE CODE/TOKENS FROM CASHIER Save An Additional 49C With $5.00 Mobil Mart Purchase. Vaild Only Al This Location: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 90-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW A SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH IN CONJUNCTION WITH GAS SALES AND A RETAIL SNACK SHOP AT 931 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 11 THROUGH 17, INCLUSIVE, TRACT 223. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on January 3, and February 20, March 20, and May 1, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for a Conditional Use Permit and made the following findings: A. The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing service station and to replace it with new facilities to support a gasoline station including gas sales, a retail snack shop and a self-service car wash; B. The automatic car wash will be equipped with a pure water rinse system rather than a blow dryer system, which reduces the noise impact to insignificant levels in conformance with the City's noise ordinance; C. The proposed use, as conditioned, is compatible with surrounding commercial and residential uses and will not cause a significant impact on the environment; D. The parking and stacking areas on the subject lot are adequate to support the proposed uses; E. The proposed use complies with the zoning ordinance and is consistent with the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit and Negative Declaration to allow a self-service car wash in conjunction with gasoline sales and a retail snack shop at -931 Pacific Coast Highway subject to the following conditions: - I9- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. The location of structures and features on the property shall be in substantial conformance with submitted plans; any modification shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. 2. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 3. The exterior of the business shall be kept in a neat and clean manner at all times. Daily sweeping and cleanup is required. 4. The car wash shall be a coin-operated self-service facility for customers and shall be automatic. No employees shall be retained on the premises for the purpose of drying, vacuuming, or detailing washed vehicles. 5. Blow dryer systems shall be prohibited. 6. The operating hours for the car wash shall be limited to between 7:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. on Mondays through Fridays and from 8:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on weekends and holidays. 7. No self-service vacuum cleaners shall be located on the site. 8. No automobile repair service shall be conducted on the site. 9. Retail merchandise, except for gasoline, shall be displayed and sold from the interior of the building only. 10. An eight (8) foot high wall, shall be provided along the westerly property line adjacent to the residential property to the west. The wall shall be constructed of decorative split block and shall be designed to maximize sound attenuation subject to review and approval of the Planning Director. The wall shall not exceed 42 inches in height for a distance of 10 feet from the edge of the right-of-way for both 9th Street and 10th Street. 11. The existing 45 -foot pole sign, located at the southeast corner of the site shall be removed. Only one pole or ground sign is permitted on the site and said sign shall be limited to 10 feet in height and shall have a decorative base or pole cover reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 12. A complete sign plan shall be submitted, including dimensions and copy, to the Building Department for approval prior to the installation of any signs on the site. 13. A back flow prevention device shall be installed to prevent spilling of wash water on the site. 14. A water reclamation system, approved by the County of Los Angeles, shall be utilized. - 20 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 15. The use of non -biodegradable detergents or waxes shall be prohibited. 16. Waste material shall be disposed in accordance with local, state, and federal laws and shall not be allowed to drain into the City's storm drains. 17. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's noise ordinance and shall not become a nuisance. (a) Complaints from residents shall constitute a nuisance 18. A sign shall be installed at the exit of the automatic car wash informing customers that no stopping is permitted for drying of cars and that cars shall proceed off the site or to a marked parking stall. Material and wording of sign shall be approved by the Planning Director. 19. Three (3) copies of a revised site plan and landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits, depicting the following: (a) Two additional parking spaces to meet the minimum requirement of six (6). (b) The air and water facilities shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from the rear property line, and shall not violate the noise ordinance. (c) The trees to be provided along the westerly property line shall be planted at intervals of ten (10) linear feet on center. Low maintenance trees shall be planted, and there shall be no nuisance created by such trees. (d) Existing mature trees of six (6) inches in diameter or greater shall be identified on the landscape plan and shall be maintained on the site. (e) The southerly entrance driveway shall be located a minimum of ten (10) feet from the westerly property line, as measured along the southerly property line and shall be a width of 35 feet. (f) A stacking lane shall be clearly marked for cars waiting to use the car wash with a capacity of five (5) cars. Said stacking lane shall not interfere with the required turning radius for the parking stalls. (g) The trash dumpster and the storage building located in the rear of the lot shall be relocated away from the west property line to a location acceptable to the Planning Director. 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20. Outdoor lighting shall be located and oriented to direct light and glare away from adjacent residential properties. 21. A manager or clerk who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. 22. Any violation of the conditions and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be grounds for an immediate revocation hearing and/or citation. 23. Any changes to the exterior or interior design shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 24. Prior to the conditional use permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 25. The Planning Commission may review the conditional use permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Ketz.Moore.Peirce.Rue NOES: Chmn.Ingell ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-1 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Be ch, California at their regular meeting of May 1990./ /% 1/! / `' Seco ► Inge, airman Michael Schubach, Secretary Date a/pers93l Mobil Oil Corporation CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254-3885 Attention: Mr. Michael Schubach Director of Planning 3800 WEST ALAMEDA AVENUE, SUITE 700 BURBANK, CALIFORNIA 91505-4331 August 7, 1990 AUG 71990 RE: CUP 89-5 MOBIL OIL STATION 931 PACIFIC COAST HWY. Dear Mr. Schubach, Attached you will find the following, as requested by the City Council. 1. Traffic study of the location and intersection. 2. Sound study of the current location between the hours of midnight and 5am. 3. Revised plot plan (8 copies both full and reduced sizes) which shows the distance between our driveway and our neighbor on ninth street at 16.6 feet. As you had indicated, you needed these materials for the Planning Commission meeting on 8/21/90. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely yours Brian E. Rechsteiner HMO C flSSOCIMIS 1 4 4 3 1 HAMLIN STREET VAN NUYS, CALIFORNIA 91401 818/785-1578 213/873-1578 August 16, 1990 Mobil Oil Corporation Suite 700 3800 West Alameda Avenue Burbank, Califomia 91505-4331 Attention: Mr. Brian Rechsteiner Subject: Mobil Service Station, Hermosa Beach, Califomia File No. 2269-00-00 Gentlemen: On August 6, 1990, we submitted a report, Traffic Engineering Study Mobil Oil Service Station Hermosa Beach, California. In response to specific concems, we concentrated on the potential impacts of motorists leaving the service station, particularly the impacts on Pacific Coast Highway traffic. It is my understanding that a question has now been raised by the City staff about the possible impacts of motorists entering the station. With the two driveways being proposed on Pacific Coast Highway, motorists entering from that street would have little or no effect on Pacific Coast Highway traffic. The effects would be similar to those resulting from motorists tuming from Pacific Coast Highway into intersecting streets. The station was designed to accommodate more than the potential patronage. Even during peak periods, the capacity of the station would exceed the demands, and there would be sufficient space on the site for motorists to enter without impeding Pacific Coast Highway traffic. It is my understanding that product deliveries would be made during off- peak periods, usually at night when traffic volumes are low, and it would be unlikely that an arriving tanker, for example, would affect traffic move- ments on Pacific Coast Highway. I would be pleased to respond to any questions regarding this matter. Very truly yours, DON D FRISCHER & ASSOCIATES Donald Frischer, P.E. DF/az TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION • ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS - 7'i - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY MOBIL OIL SERVICE STATION HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: MOBIL OIL CORPORATION AUGUST 6, 1990 AU . 7 !990 0001110 fRISCt1fR O flSSOCIflTfS TRA/!IC AND TRANSPORTATION • CNCINCCRS AND PLANNCRS 14431 HAMLIN STREET • SUITE 1 VAN NUYS, CALIFORNIA • 91401 818 /785-1578 213 / 873.1578 DOM FRISCflR E flSSOCIPtS 1 4 4 3 1 HAMLIN STREET VAN NUYS, CALIFORNIA 91401 818/785-1578 213/873-1578 August 6, 1990 Mobil Oil Corporation Suite 700 3800 West Alameda Avenue Burbank, California 91505-4331 Attention: Mr. Brian Rechsteiner Subject: Mobil Service Station, Hermosa Beach, California Gentlemen: Attached is our report, Traffic Engineering Study Mobil Oil Service- Station erviceStation Hermosa Beach, California. We have specifically addressed the potential for patrons leaving the proposed station to interfere with traffic movements on Pacific Coast Highway. Based on our studies, we have found that there are and will be sufficient gaps in the southbound traffic flow on Pacific Coast Highway to allow convenient and safe entry by patrons of the new station. We would be pleased to respond to any questions regarding the study and its results. Very truly yours, LD FRISCHER ASSOCIATES Donald Frischer, President Registered Professional Engineer Civil No. 9141 Traffic No. 44 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION • ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS -2(9-- •1 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY MOBIL OIL SERVICE STATION HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION The Mobil Oil Corporation is proposing to rebuild the service station at the southwestern corner of the intersection at Pacific Coast Highway/ Aviation Boulevard -Tenth Street in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. The plan is to convert the existing two -island, four -position service station and auto repair garage to a four -island, sixteen -position service station with a drive-through car wash and Mobil Mart. The existing service station has two driveways on Pacific Coast Highway, one driveway on Ninth Street, and one driveway on Tenth Street. Donald Frischer & Associates was retained to evaluate the access conditions for the proposed service station and to determine the potential for traffic impacts on the adjacent streets that might result from the operation of the new station. 1 000010 FRISCHER C OSSOCIOIES EXISTING TRAFFIC FACILITIES Pacific Coast Highway (State Route 1) is a north -south, major highway. In the vicinity of the Mobil service station, the street has two travel lanes in each direction separated by a painted median with left -turn lanes at the intersections. Northbound Pacific Coast Highway has a right -turn -only lane for motorists turning onto Aviation Boulevard. The lane begins just south of the Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation Boulevard - Tenth Street intersection. Aviation Boulevard is an east -west arterial street that originates at Pacific Coast Highway. In the vicinity of the Mobil service station, the street has two travel lanes in each direction separated by a painted median. Westbound Aviation Boulevard has a separate right -turn -only lane for motorists turning to head north on Pacific Coast Highway. Tenth Street is an east -west local street that runs along the northern side of the service station. At the service station, Tenth Street is actually a driveway that serves the service station, because the street is physically blocked to traffic westerly of the service station. On its approach to Pacific Coast Highway, Tenth Street is striped for a right - turn -only lane in the eastbound direction. The Pacific Coast Highway/ Aviation Boulevard -Tenth Street intersection is controlled by a four- phase, semi -actuated traffic signal. The left -tum -only (no U turn) move- ments on northbound and southbound Pacific Coast Highway are provided with separate signal phases (left -turn arrows). 2 000810 ERISCRER 6 RSSOCIR!ES _2g_ NOT A THROUGH STREET signs are posted on Tenth Street west of and facing Pacific Coast Highway Boulevard. A DO NOT BLOCK INTERSECTION sign is posted on Pacific Coast Highway at the southwest corner of the intersection facing southbound Pacific Coast Highway and westbound Aviation Boulevard. A YIELD sign is posted for the right -turn -only lane on Tenth Street. Push-button pedestrian actuated signals are provided for the crosswalks across Tenth Street, the south leg of Pacific Coast Highway, and Aviation Boulevard. There is no pedestrian crosswalk across the north leg of Pacific Coast Highway. NO STOPPING ANYTIME signs are posted on southbound Pacific Coast Highway along the frontage of the Mobil service station. Parking is not permitted on Tenth Street between 8:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon on the westbound side of the street on Thursdays and on the eastbound side on Wednesdays. Ninth Street is an east -west local street that runs along the southem side of the service station. In the vicinity of the service station, the street has one travel lane in each direction. There are no separate turning lanes on Ninth Street on the approach to the intersection at Pacific Coast Highway. The Pacific Coast Highway/Ninth Street intersection is not controlled by a traffic signal. At the intersection, left -turning and U-tuming move- ments are prohibited on southbound Pacific Coast Highway between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. except on Sundays. There is a pedestrian crosswalk on the north leg of the Pacific Coast Highway. There is an RTD bus stop at the northwest comer of the intersection. 3 0001110 FRISCRER C RSSOCIRIES Eastbound Ninth Street is controlled by a STOP sign on the approach to Pacific Coast Highway. In the vicinity of the service station, parking is not permitted at the curb on the eastbound side of the street from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon on Thursdays and at all times on the west- bound side of the street. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A traffic gap and headway study was conducted during the afternoon peak period on Tuesday, July 17, 1990. The purpose of the study was to determine the lengths and numbers of gaps occurring in the traffic flow in the curb lane and in the lane next to curb lane on southbound Pacific Coast Highway at the northern driveway of the existing service station. A second study was conducted during the afternoon peak period on Wednesday July 18, 1990, to determine the current utilization of the gaps by motorists leaving the existing the service station. A gap is defined as the time lapse in seconds measured at a reference point across a single direction of travel between the rear bumper of the last automobile in a platoon of vehicles and the front bumper of the first automobile in the next platoon of vehicles. Gaps in the traffic stream are required for motorists to tum from either a cross street or a driveway onto an intersecting street. For right-tuming movements from a minor street or driveway (in this case from either driveway onto Pacific Coast Highway), the duration of the gap should be at least 5.5 seconds for the first vehicle plus 3.5 seconds for each succeeding vehicle.' 1 Transportation Research Board National Research Council, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Table 10.2, "Critical Gap Criteria for Unslgnalized Intersections," Washington, D.C., 1985. 4 000810 ERIS&HER & SSSO&IRIES —30 The sizes and numbers of gaps occurring on southbound Pacific Coast Highway at the service station would depend primarily on the operation of the traffic signal at the Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation Boulevard - Tenth Street intersection. The results of the gap study are summarized in Table 1, attached. Although queuesformed occasionally on southbound Pacific Coast Highway because of the reduction from three lanes to two lanes along the frontage of the service station, the lengths and numbers of gaps were found to be adequate for the flow of traffic out of the existing service station, As a result of the field study, it was determined that even during peak periods, 120 motorists per hour would be able to enter southbound Pacific Coast Highway from the service station because of the gaps that are created. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Studies were performed in the year 1989 by Donald Frischer & Associates at several existing Mobil Oil Corporation service stations in Los Angeles and Ventura counties to determine the volumes of traffic attracted by service stations. Prior to the studies, available data was obtained at stations in parts of the country other than Califomia and was not considered to be applicable. 5 3 000010 ERISCRER E ASSOCIATES For example, the studies cited in 4th Edition Trip Generation,2 a publication generally considered a valid source, were conducted in the year 1973 in the eastern part of the United States. The stations in those studies produced about 1.8 vehicle trips (1.0 entering, 0.8 exiting) per pumping position during the morning peak hour and 3.6 vehicle trips (1.9 "entering, 1.7 exiting) per pumping position during the afternoon peak hour. Other data that was found in another source, 10th Progress Report On Trips Ends Generation Research Counts, published by the State of California Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Public Works, Division of Highways, San Francisco, California, July 1973 was considered possibly obsolete. The service stations examined in those studies were located in California and produced about 3.0 vehicle trips (1.5 entering, 1.5 exiting) per pumping position during the morning peak hour and about 5.0 vehicle trips (2.5 entering, 2.5 exiting) per pumping position during the afternoon peak hour. Theoretically, the maximum number of vehicles that can be served with fuel at any time is equal to the number of pumping positions. In the newer service stations, any one of three grades of fuel can be obtained at each pumping position. Based on recent studies at four Mobil Oil Corporation stations, it was found that the average number of trips produced by the stations amounted to about 4.3 vehicle trips (2.3 entering, 2.0 exiting) per pumping position during the morning peak hour and about 4.7 vehicle trips (2.4 entering, 2.3 exiting) per pumping position during the afternoon peak hour. 2institute Of Transportation Engineers, 4th Edition Trip Generation, Washington, D.C., 1987. 6 —32- 000810 FRISCNFR C OSSOCIOIFS A very low percentage of the trips that are attracted to service stations are generated trips, that is, service -station -only trips. Most of the trips are pass -by trips—trips being made by motorists already on adjacent streets and coming from or going to other destinations. Based on studies published in 4th Edition Trip Generation, 54 percent of the moming peak -hour trips and 58 percent of the aftemoon peak hour trips into and out of service stations are pass -by trips. Those percentages were based on studies that were done during or before the year 1973. A more recent article about the trip characteristics of convenience stores with gasoline dispensing units, "Transportation Characteristics of Convenience Stores with Gas Pumps," appeared in the June 1990 issue of ITE Joumal, a periodical published by the Institute of Trans- portation Engineers, Washington, D.C. In that study, it was found that during the afternoon peak hour, an average of 76 percent of the trips attracted by those convenience stores are pass -by trips. Service stations would have trip characteristics that are similar to those of convenience stores with gasoline dispensing units, because many service stations now have small convenience stores on the premises. Very likely, the proportion of pass -by trips would probably be higher for service stations, because many have smaller convenience stores or no convenience store at all. The volume of traffic (vehicles per hour) generated by a service station is relatively low, because a significant proportion of the traffic attracted by service stations consists of pass -by trips. The percentage of primary (generated) traffic—service station only trips—is low compared with traffic generated by other commercial land uses. 7 -33- OOORL5 FRISCNER E RSSOCIRIES For example, a typical gasoline service station with sixteen pumping positions would attract between an average of 40 and a high of 60 vehicles during the afternoon peak hour. (To account for seasonal peak periods and for the attractiveness of the new station, the maxi- mum future volumes were estimated at 150 percent of the average.) Of the total traffic associated with the service station during peak hours, 76 percent (30 to 46 trips) would already be on the adjacent streets for other trip purposes. The additional traffic that would be generated by the service station (number of primary trips) would be 10 to 14 vehicles during the peak hour. Based on projections by the Mobil Oil Corporation for the subject service station after the planned reconstruction, the maximum future traffic would amount to 115 vehicles per peak hour at the rates of 3.6 entering trips and 3.6 a git En"—<-1—ring ntrips per pumping position. The future traffic volumes into and out of the planned service station were assigned to the driveways based on travel patterns at the existing service station. During the afternoon peak hour, an estimated 20 motorists would exit from the northern driveway onto Pacific Coast Highway, 15 motorists would exit from the southern driveway onto Pacific Coast Highway, five motorists would exit onto Tenth Street, and 15 motorists would exit onto Ninth Street. A concern has been expressed that the might be conflicts resulting from the increased traffic movements from the proposed service station onto Pacific Coast Highway, and a examination of that potential was the primary objective of this study. 8 OHM FRISCRER C RSSOCIREES The maximum number of motorists that would exit from the two driveways on Pacific Coast Highway would be an estimated 35 during the afternoon peak hour—considerably fewer than the estimated 120 vehicles that could be accommodated currently in the available gaps during peak periods. The delays that would be experienced by motorists leaving the new station while waiting for sufficient gaps in traffic on Pacific Coast Highway would not exceed the delays being experienced by motorists on the same street at signalized intersections. CONCLUSIONS Future traffic volumes into and out of the proposed service station would amount to an estimated 115 vehicle trips per hour (total in both directions) during afternoon peak periods. The estimated number of motorists who would leave the station onto Pacific Coast Highway would amount to an estimated 35 per hour during the aftemoon peak period. The estimated capacityof the gaps on southbound Pacific Coast Highway is 120 vehicles per hour, and that capacity is not expected to change significantly in the near future. The gaps would be adequate to receive the exiting traffic without impacts to the traffic on Pacific Coast Highway. Other movements associated with the new service station would be accommodated without significant impacts. The design of the new station is similar to that of other stations that have been built and found to be acceptable from a traffic access and circulation viewpoint in other locations. 9 -35-- OOOREO ::!SCNER C RSSOCIRI[S MEASURED GAPS1 Seconds TABLE 1 GAP CAPACITY UTILIZATION MOBIL SERVICE STATION HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NUMBER OF VEHICLES THAT COULD UTILIZE GAP2 Vehicles/Gap NUMBER OF GAPS COUNTED Number TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES THAT COULD UTILIZE AVAILABLE GAPS Vehicles 6 to 8 1 33 33 9 to 10 2 15 30 11to14 3 19 57 15 to 18 4 5 20 to 19 5 840 W Sum of all vehicles that could utilize available gaps, 4:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. 180 Sum of all vehicles that could utilize available gaps, peak hour 120 1 Period of observation, 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. 2Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manua/ Special Report 209, Table 10.2, "Critical Gap Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections," Washington, D. C., 1985. Davy & Associates, Inc. Consultants in Acoustics 865 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Suite 202 • Manhattan Beach. California 90266-4900 • 213/546-3387 JN 90006D ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS OF CAR WASH 931 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 199 for MOBIL OIL CORPORATION 3800 West Alameda Avenue, Suite #700 Burbank, California 91505 JULY, 1990 Client: NOISE MONITORING TEST REPORT Mobil Oil Corporation 3800 West Alameda Avenue. Suite f700 Burbank. California 91505 Test Location: 931 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach. California 91505 Test Date: July 26. 1990 Test Equipment The following test eauioment was utilized: o Bruel & Kiaer Model 4230 Acoustical Calibrator o Larson Davis Laboratories Model 700-20 Dosimeter Sound Level Meter. SN B0428 o Larson Davis Laboratories Model 700 -MI Electret Microphone. 3/8" Diameter o Larson Davis Laboratories UAO 237 Windscreen o Gen Rad 1945 Sound Level Meter 1 a • Noise Measurement Procedures Ambient noise monitoring was conducted from 15 minutes after midnight (00:15) to 5:30 a.m. (05:30) on July 26. 1990. Data was collected at the southwest corner of the existing Mobil Station. The microphone was located approximately 55 feet north of 9th Street and approximately 10 feet east of the west property line wall. This location was approximately 145 feet west of the center line of Pacific Coast Highway. The microphone was mounted 12 feet above grade and fitted with a windscreen. It was a calm morning. and there was no wind. A detailed log was kept of the activities that took place during the monitoring period in 15 -minute increments. The results of this activity log are summarized in Table 1. The Larson Davis Model 700 was programmed to collect data in the same 15 -minute increments that activities were noted in Table 1. The Larson Davis Model 700 has its own internal clock. and the clock was set to the correct time and the run times were then programmed. Following the collection of data. the Larson Davis was connected to an IBM PC and the data was extracted automatically utilizing a Larson Davis software package. Various noise metrics are listed in the computer printout attached to this report. The column titled "LVL" is the equivalent sound level LEO. The LEO is the energy averaged noise level during the measurement period. This is the noise level that would have the same acoustic energy as the time varying noise during the measurement interval. The L50. L25. L8, and L2 are the noise levels that were exceeded during each measurement hour for 50%. 25%. 8%, and 2% of.the time. These statistical levels correspond to the noise levels exceeded for 30 minutes. 15 minutes. 5 minutes. and 1 minute in a measurement hour. As can be seen in Table 1. the gas delivery truck arrived in the 2:00 a.m. period. This 15 minute interval indicated an increase in the average noise level (LEO) from 57.5 dBA to 61.0 dBA. The next 15 -minute increment was quieter during the gas delivery operation. When the truck finished the operation in the 2:30 interval. the average noise level was in the 62 dBA range. Except for those 2 time intervals. average ambient noise levels due to traffic on Pacific Coast Highway were in the high 50 dB to 60 dB range from midnight until approximately 2:00 a.m. and in the mid-50 range from 3:00 a.m. until 4:00 a.m. when they began increasing. This is typical of sites that are near major arterials carrying the traffic volumes equivalent to those on Pacific Coast Highway. Table 1 4 Noise Producing Activities in 15 -minute Intervals Mobil Station - 936 PCH Hermosa Beach Time Activities 00:15 Car at Pump #1 VW pulls up to Pump #2 Car leaves VW leaves 00:30 Nothing 00:45 Car passed through lot 01:00 Nothing 01:15 Pick-up truck pulled into south east corner. Left motor running for approximately 5 minutes. Turned engine off and staved. Car pulled up to front door and staved for 2-3 minutes. 01:30 Two young ladies walked across yard - talking softly. Car pulls up to Pump #2 Car leaves. No traffic 01:45 No traffic Car drives through lot 02:00 Gas truck arrives Undoes covers -measures Unloads hoses Starts delivery 02:15 Unloads second set of hoses Delivery of gas continues. No traffic Unclasp hose -start next tank. Moved hoses 3 02:30 Completed delievery. Put hoses away Replaces covers Return hoses to truck Car pulls up to Pump 11 Continues to put hoses away Replaces covers Truck starts engine Car pulls out 02:45 Gas truck pulls out Small car pulls up to front door Car pulls out .03:00 Nothing 03:15 Motorcycle passed by Car in/out 03:30 Nothing 03:45 Truck pulls in 04:00 Truck leaves Small truck passes through 04:15 Nothing 04:30 Car at signal with racing engine Van pulls up to Pump 12 Van leaves 04:45 05:00 05:15 Nothing Nothing Car pulls up to Pump 02 Truck pulls through parking area Car leaves Car pulls up to Pump 11 FTI F: Mf7AIl 5 • MOBIL OIL 9.6 PCH, HERMOSA AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS START TIME: 00:15 STOP TIME: 05:30 DATE: 7/26/90 LOCATION: SOUTHWEST PROPERTY LINE ___�NTERVAI REPORT elk Bi •.m.* 1. -0OD2S 700 S3 B04-'88 DATA FROM: MOBIL5 07/26/90 15: �9: 11 Date 26 JUL Period 00:15 h:m Time LVL SEL Lmin Lmax Lpk. E:: F'k: Ov L02 LOB L25 L50 0:15:01 60.0 89.5 42.0 69.0 82.5 0 0 0 66.0 64.5 61.5 58.5 0:30:01 60.0 89.5 42.0 72.5 107.5 0 0 0 67.0 64.0 61.0 57.0 0:45:01 59.5 89.5 42.0 71.5 95.0 0 0 0 67.5 64.0 61.0 57.0 1:00:01 58.0 87.5 39.0 67.5 81.5 0 0 0 64.5 62.5 59.0 56.0 1:15:01 58.0 88.0 45.0 71.0 88.5 0 0 0 65.5 62.5 59.0 54.5 1:30:01 57.5 87.0 45.0 71.0 87.0 0 0 0 65.0 62.5 58.5 54.0 1:45:01 57.5 87.0 45.0 67.5 80.0 0 0 0 65.0 62.0 59.0 54.5 2:00:01 61.0 90.5 45.5 77.0 99.0 0 0 0 71.0 64.5 60.10 56.0 2:15:01 56.0 85.5 45.0 72.5 95.0 0 0 0 64.0 60.0 55.5 51.0 2:30:01 62.0 91.5 44.0 78.5 102.5 0 0 0 70.0 68.0 60.5 54.5 2:45:01 56.1) 85.5 45.0 71.0 83.5 0 0 0 64.0 60.0 56.0 50.0 3:00:01 54.5 84.0 44.5 67.0 84.5 0 0 0 62.5 59.0 56.0 49.0 7:15:01 58.0 87.5 39.0 79.5 99.5 0 0 0 63.5 600.0 55.0 47.5 3:30:01 57.5 87.0 38.0 65.0 78.5 0 0 0 62.0 59.5 54.0 46.0 3:45:01 52.0 81.5 38.0 64.0 83.5 0 0 0 61.0 58.0 52.5 44.5 4:00:01 54.0 83.5 39.0 66.5 88.5 0 0 0 :61.5 59.0 55.0 49.5 4:15:01 57.0 87.0 38.5 73.0 88.0 0 0 0 67.0 61.0 56.0 50.5 4:70:01 56.5 86.0 40.0 66.5 84.0 0 0 0 64.0 61.5 57.5 52.0 4:45:01 58.5 88.0 42.0 74.0 86.0 0 0 0 66.5 62.5 59.0 55.5 5:00:01 60.0 89.5 42.5 74.5 89.0 0 0 0 67.5 64.0 60.5 56.5 5:15:01 60.0 89.5 40.5 73.5 87.5 0 0 0 66.5 64.0 61.0 57.5 OVERALL LEO: 58.2 �� Z • August 29, 1990 City Council Meeting September 11, 1990 Mayor and Members of the City Council CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION - August 1990 At the August 28, 1990 City Council appoint the following: Mayor Mayor Pro Tempore Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee South Bay Sanitation District Inglewood Fire Training Authority meeting, Council acted to Chuck Sheldon Kathleen Midstokke Delegate - Mayor Sheldon Delegate - Alternate Delegate - Alternate Mayor Sheldon - Kathleen Midstokke Mayor Sheldon - Kathleen Midstokke Appointments may be made this evening for the remainder of the committee assignments. Attached for your information is the current committee assignment listing, noting changes made on August 28, 1990. Please contact Mayor Sheldon concerning your preference with regard to committee assignments. Noted: NORTHC FT City Doerfling, City C'lerk VIN B. , Manager Attachment 13 a CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION OF DELEGATES, ALTERNATE APPOINTMENTS AND/OR RE -APPOINTMENT Beach Cities Coalition for Drug Free Youth Delegate Essertier Beach Cities Committee Delegate Sheldon Delegate Midstokke Commuter Transportation Implementation Plan Steering Committee Delegate Creighton Alternate Essertier Coordinating Council Delegate Sheldon Independent Cities Association Delegate Midstokke Alternate Wiemans Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority Delegate Midstokke Resolution No. 89-5336 Alternate Copeland Independent Cities Risk Management Association Delegate Sheldon Resolution No. 87-5095 Alternate Blackwood Inglewood Fire Training Authority Commission (same as South Bay Sanitation District) Delegate Creighton Sheldon Alternate Midstokke Midstokke League of California Cities - Board of Directors Delegate---e�►ans�� Alternate Essertier Page 1 Appointments 08-28-90 Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee (must appoint alter- nate separately each time when unable to attend called meeting) Mayor Greighten Sheldon Sister City Association, Inc. Delegate Essertier Alternate Creighton South Bay Cities Association Delegate Essertier Alternate Wiemans South Bay Cities Sanitation District (County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles) (Same as Inglewood Fire Training Authority) Delegate Gr.Dighton Sheldon Alternate Iii -ds of J e. Midstokke South Bay Corridor Study Steering Committee Delegate Essertier Alternate Wiemans South Bay Juvenile Diversion Project Delegate Sheldon Alternate Creighton Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Delegate Midstokke Alternate Sheldon Southern California Rapid Transit District Delegate Creighton Resolution No. 89-5335 Alternate Sheldon West Basin Water Association Delegate Wiemans Page 2 Appointments 08-28-90 SUB -COMMITTEES City/School Relations Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Creighton Councilmember Sheldon Oil Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Essertier Councilmember Wiemans City Manager Compensation Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Sheldon Councilmember Wiemans City Manager Review System Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Midstokke Councilmember Essertier Data Processing Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Sheldon Councilmember Essertier Page 3 Appointments 08-28-90 August 23, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 11, 1990 FENCE REPAIRS AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AND CLARK FIELD CIP 89-506 Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission Recommendation: The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommended at the March 28, 1990 regular meeting: 1. The expenditure of $19,800 for the repair and replacement of fences, gates and wind screens as necessary at the Community Center, Clark Field and parkettes. 2. To add the purchase of fencing for the use of a pitching warm-up area at Clark Field. The fence should be parallel to the fence extending past the dugout 50' in length and 5' in height. Staff Recommendation: Staff concurs with the Commission's recommendation except for the new fence at the pitching warm-up area, which staff believes should be funded by the Hermosa Beach Little League. It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the staff to solicit formal bids for the repair of the concrete retaining wall along Ardmore and replacement of the chain link safety fencing along Ardmore and Pier Avenue at the Community Center and issue addenda as neccessary. 2. Direct staff to ask Little League to pay for the pitching warm-up area at Clark Field. Background: The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission, on March 28, 1990, recommended expenditure of $19,800 for the repair and replacement of fences, gates and wind screens as necessary at the Community Center, Clark Field and various parks. Analysis: Staff's experience with small public works projects where the estimated cost is less then $5,000 has shown that obtaining three informal bids for these types of projects is cost effective. However, the City Attorney has reviewed the following projects and has determined that the staff should go out to formal bid on those projects where the bids could end up over the $5,000 limit for informal bids. Where two or more small projects appear that they could be joined together, the City Attorney has advised not to split the bids and that the staff should go out to formal bid. Therefore, the following fence projects recommended by the Commission are a mixture of both formal and informal bidding procedures. Where the low bids are above $5,000, the staff will return to the City Council for approval and award of the contract. The staff has surveyed the following locations and proposes the following projects: COMMUNITY CENTER Repair of the concrete retaining wall along Ardmore Avenue. The wall is damaged due to excessive corrosion at the bottom of the posts for the safety fencing. Estimated Cost: $5,000 (Formal bid to be required). AR EASTOBER EPAi4ZFD ARRA 400E AVENUE lb. Replacement of the chain link safety fencing along the Ardmore Avenue retaining wall on both Pier Avenue and Ardmore Avenue. The fabric is in bad condition and needs to be replaced. Estimated Cost: $5,000 (Formal bid to be required). FENCE TO BE REPLACED -Y-c-c-X-X-X AVENUE - 2 - ARDA 401R Repair of the wind screens and fencing around the north tennis courts. The east wind screen is damaged and should be replaced, along with the fencing on both the east and south sides of the tennis courts. Estimated Cost: $4,900 (Informal bid is allowed and Purchase Order issued). w CLARK FIELD RE!^OVg/REPL.ACE r-ARic REMOVE/REPLACE WIND SCREEr1 ARDMORE AVENUE- Replacement VENUE Replacement of damaged fencing around the lawn bowling green. The existing fence is very rusty and damaged at various locations. The recommendation is that the fence fabric be replaced by a green vinyl coated chain link fabric, the same as the adjacent existing fences. Estimated Cost: $3,300 (Informal bid is allowed and Purchase Order issued). .z Ln f— VRLLEY CRIVE APPROVED BASKETBALL COUk r ( r . w ` TEN NIS COURTS 140 -FT x � w4-1 L !4 W N BOWLING GREEN BUILDING 35 -Fr REr1OV E 4 REPLACE FABRIC The damaged fence around the site of the approved basketball courts is included in the bid for that project. The cost of that work is not included in the costs of this Council item. (Formal bid is to be required in the basketball court project). SEE ABOVE SKETCH The Little League has requested the installation of a new chain link fence for the pitching warm up area. It is the recommendation from the Public Works Department that this item should be funded by the Little League instead of with city funds that are being used for repair work. This recommendation is consistant with City Council direction for CIP 89-506 - "Limit to basics, save rest for aquisitions." Estimated Cost: $3,600 which exceeds the total of the recommended funds. (No bidding is proposed) Fiscal Impact: C e CL Z PROPOSED PITCHING 'r✓RRr1UP AREA 100- Fr —x—x—x-o EXISTING BLOCK WALL EXISTING CHAIN L-twlfc FENCE Parks & Recreation Facilities Fund, CIP 89-506 Budget for FY 1990-91. Estimated Expenditures Item la. Repair of Retaining Wall, Community Center Item lb. Replacement of Chain Link Fabric Item 2. Repair of Wind Screens and Fencing Item 3. Replacement of Damaged Fencing $30,000 $ 4,990 4,980 4,900 3,300 Subtotal $18,170 Estimated balance available for basketball court lights $11,830 Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to Council are: 1. Increase scope of the project by adding funds for the pitching area. 2. Increase scope of the project by adding additional locations. 3. Reduce scope of the project. 4. Do not proceed with the project. Respectfully Submitted, Homayoun Behboodi Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copelaid Director of Finances cc: Hermosa Beach Little League Concur: Lynn Terry DeputCity Engineer Anthony Antich Director of Public Works NOTA o: i- Mary R•?ey Dir.ct•r of Community Resources ,op NOT cn Nci Kevin Northcraft/ City Manager ty/hbfr CITY MANAGER COMMENT: The Commission recommendation was made before Council discussion during budget deliberations to defer expenditures at the Community Center that could be impacted by the Yard relocation. Accordingly, I recommend the Council defer the fencing and wind screen at the Community Center. How- ever, Council should authorize the concrete work requested and expand it to other areas of the Community Center where safety and major structural damage are concerns. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST FOR BID FENCE REPAIRS/REPLACEMENT AND NEW INSTALLATIONS AT COMMUNITY CENTER AND CLARK FIELD I. GENERAL INFORMATION: A. The work to be performed or executed under this project consists of and includes the furnishing of all labor, materials, tools, equipment and other incidental and appurtenant work necessary for the proper construction and completion of the contract in a satisfactory and proper manner. The scope of the work shall comply with standard specifications for public works construction. B. All bids must be received by 2:00 P.M., Thursday, September 27, 1990. City of Hermosa Beach City Clerks Office 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ATTENTION: Homayoun Behboodi The title of the bid request should be clearly marked on the envelope. C. The successful bidder must have a current City Business License, Workers' Compensation And Liability Insurance. D. The prices are to be bid as complete and separate for each specific project as listed in Section II. II. SPECIFIC INFORMATION COMMUNITY CENTER Project(1) OUTER CHAIN LINK FENCE Remove approximately 830 lineal feet of chain link fence including the overhead structure at S.W. corner of property. Install approximately 850 lineal feet of 8 foot high chain link fence, using the existing posts. Cost of removal shall be included in the installation cost. Fabric shall be galvanized 9 gage vinyl green coated, knuckled top and bottom. Posts and rails shall be sanded, primed and painted green (weather resistant paint). ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1. Replace posts 10 ea. 2. Paint existing Lump Sum posts & rails 3. Install bottom 850 L.F. rail 4. Install 8 feet high 850 L.F. chain link fence Price (in words): TOTAL Project(2) RETAINING WALL Repair concrete retaining wall along the property on Pier Avenue and Ardmore Avenue. Form and place epoxy concrete where wall is damaged. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1. Place epoxy concrete 40 EA. Price (in words): III. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. Fittings to be pressed steel, galvanized painted green. 2. Top/bottom rail sizes to match existing per area. 3. All repairs/replacement and appurtenant work shall be completed by the contractor and be included in the contract price. 4. Contractor shall provide traffic control at all times. 5. All areas to be broom swept clean and finished. 6. All work to be complete within 14 calendar days. 7. All prospective bidders shall meet with Mr. Homayoun Behboodi and tour the job site in order to be cosidered responsive to this bid request. Mr. Behboodi can be reached at 318-0214, Monday - Thursday, 7:00 am to 6:00 pm. Contractor Name and Address ty/reqbid Signature Date September 4, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 11, 1990 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 90-5 AND TEXT AMENDMENT INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PURPOSE: TO EXAMINE ALLOWING CAR STEREO AND CAR ALARM INSTALLATION AS A PERMITTED USE ONLY IN THE C-3 ZONE SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND TO PROPOSE ADDING SAID USE TO THE C-3 PERMITTED USE LIST Recommendation The Planning Commission and staff recommend adoption of the attached ordinance amending the permitted use list in the C-3 zone to include "automobile audio equipment sales, installation, and/or repair" and "automobile alarm sales, installation, and/or repair" only with a C.U.P. Background The Planning Commission at their August 7, 1990 meeting recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed text amendment. This issue was initially brought to the attention of the City from concerns noted by Mr. Richard Sullivan in regards to the nuisances being created by a nearby alarm installation business. Please refer to attached Planning Commission staff report and minutes for further background. Analysis Please refer to the the analysis. attached Planning Commission Staff Report for Attachments 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. P.C. Resolution 90-66 3. P.C. Staff Report 8/7/90 4. P.C. Minutes 8/7/90, 6/19/90 5. Staff Review Minutes, 7/5/90 6. Correspondence 1 Michael Schubach Planning Director p/pcsralrm 6, 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 90 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT TO ADD INSTALLATION OF AUTOMOBILE AUDIO EQUIPMENT AND ALARMS AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE C-3 ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on August 7, 1990, and made the following Findings: A. Installation of audio equipment and alarms in automobiles is not specifically listed as a permitted use in any zone; B. Businesses which install audio equipment and alarms on automobiles create a potential nuisance to adjacent property owners and residents because of the noise impact of installing and testing the equipment; C. Restricting this business activity to the C-3 zone and requiring a conditional use permit will ensure that environmental impacts associated with this activity will be minimized; D. The subject amendment will clarify the existing code in regards to the subject use, and will subject said uses to the proper regulation to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses; E. Approval of this amendment is not in conflict with the General Plan and is necessary to carry out, the general purpose of the zoning ordinance to serve the public health, safety, and welfare; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby amend the zoning ordinance text as follows, and adopts an environmental negative declaration: Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 1. Amend Section 8-4. C-3 Restricted Commercial zone by adding the following to the permitted use list in alphabetical order: "Automobile alarm sales, installation, and/or repair: Conditional Use Permit required subject to Article 10; Automobile audio equipment sales, installation, and/or repair; Conditional Use Permit required subject to Article 10" SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1990, by following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: p/persalrm CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 3 - BACKGROUND. MATERIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 90-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD INSTALLATION OF AUTOMOBILE AUDIO EQUIPMENT AND ALARMS AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE C-3 ZONE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 7, 1990, and made the following Findings: A. Installation of audio equipment and alarms in automobiles is not specifically listed as a permitted use in any zone; B. Businesses which install audio equipment and alarms on automobiles create a potential nuisance to adjacent property owners and residents because of the noise impact of installing and testing the equipment; C. Restricting this business activity to the C-3 zone and requiring the scrutiny of conditional use permit will ensure that environmental impacts associated with this activity will be minimized; D. The subject amendment will clarify the existing code in regards to the subject use, and will subject said uses to the proper regulation to ensure compatibility of adjacent land uses; E. Approval of this amendment is not in conflict with the General Plan and is necessary to carry out the general purpose of the zoning ordinance to serve the public health, safety, and welfare; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby recommend amending the zoning ordinance text as follows, and adoption of an environmental negative declaration: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Amend Section 8-4. C-3 Restricted Commercial zone by adding the following to the permitted use list in alphabetical order: "Automobile alarm sales, installation, and/or repair: Conditional Use Permit required subject to Article 10; Automobile audio equipment sales, installation, and/or repair; Conditional Use Permit required subject to Article 10" VOTE: AYES: Comms.Ketz,Rue,Chmn.Ingell NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comms.Moore,Peirce CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-66 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting o A 'vst 7, 1990. / / �/ _ jam% > /`/... Michael Schubach, Scott Ingell, pairman /2 1, ) C Date s Secretary p/persalrm Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission August 1, 1990 Regular Meeting of August 7, 1990 SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 90-5 AND TEXT AMENDMENT INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PURPOSE: TO EXAMINE ALLOWING CAR STEREO AND CAR ALARM INSTALLATION AS A PERMITTED USE ONLY IN THE C-3 ZONE SUBJECT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND TO PROPOSE ADDING SAID USE TO THE C-3 PERMITTED USE LIST Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution recommending amending the permitted use list in the C-3 zone to include "automobile audio equipment sales, installation, and/or repair" and "automobile alarm sales, installation, and/or repair" only with a C.U.P. Background At the June 19, 1990 meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to set this matter for public hearing as soon as possible. This issue was initially brought to the attention of the City from concerns noted by Mr. Richard Sullivan in regards to the nuisances being created by a nearby alarm installation business. Analysis Currently, car stereo/alarm installers are operating in the City with business licenses. These businesses were granted approval under the general category of "automobile parts and accessories - retail sales" when it was acceptable to allow uses which were generally similar. Obviously, as noted by Mr. Sullivan, the installation of alarms and stereos can cause a severe nuisance to neighboring residents and businesses. Especially with new technology and the popularity of alarms and stereos with high noise volumes, such as "boom boxes". In staff's judgement these types of installations should be regulated and should be limited to the C-3 zone. Staff believes that a separate category is appropriate for purposes of clarification, and also would include all such installation uses under one specific category whether or not they are a primary or secondary uses. Secondly, the C.U.P. review process would mean that such activities would be subject to the scrutiny of the Planning Commission in regards to such important concerns as the proximity of residential uses, whether or not the installation and testing would be conducted inside, and the hours of operation. Standard conditions of approval, such as prohibiting the manufacturing of "boom boxes" outdoors could also be imposed. 9 It should be noted that existing businesses with auto stereo/alarm installation activities will be subject to C.U.P. review under the recently adopted amortization ordinance within two years of notice if this text amendment is adopted by the City. CONCUR :r' / Michael Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. P.C. Minutes 6/19/90 3. Staff Review Minutes, 7/5/90 4. Correspondence 5. Public notice affidavit p/pcsalrm '7 , bt{siness for the area, and the owner needs every opportunity available to succeed. He als notal that working people need longer hours in order to go after work. He stated that if they; is a pro em with staying open until 11:00 P.M., seven days a week, the matter could be revie ed. Mr. Schu ach, in response to a question from Comm. Rue, stated that the hours of peration were based on the parking need in the downtown area on weekend nights. Chmn. Ingell fel that most people will walk or bike to this business. He felt t . t allowing this business to have at the competition has will help it to be competitive and t• succeed. Mr. Schubach, in res o onse to a question from Comm. Ketz, explained at the hours in the resolution were the hou proposed by the applicant; however, he ass • med that the applicant would be happy to have - - nded hours of operation. Chmn. Ingell stated that mos of the customers would probab walk or bike to the gym. In regard to the number of spaces ,cquired for the parking plan e suggested that the applicant keep a record of how his custome . rrive which could be pr: ented at the six-month review. In this way, if there is proof of how the customers arrived, ere can be justification as to why these hours were allowed. MOTION by Chmn. Ingell, seconded by Resolution P.C. 90-63, with the following cha that the hours of operation shall be from 5:30 Comm. Rue suggested adding a condition the parking structure before a final buil etz, to approve staffs recommendation. 1) Condition No. 1 shall be modified to state . until 11:00 P.M. ated t g permit imposing a time limit on the completion of is sued. Mr. Warren stated that they will e every effort to c. plete the parking structure in six months; however, he requested t : t the time limit be one y r. He stated that he can provide two spaces after 7:00 P.M. and • e space after 7:30 P.M., anthe dry cleaner operator can let him use two spaces after 7:30 .M., for a total of five spaces. AMENDMENT TO THE • TION by Chmn. Ingell as maker and a: eed to by Comm. Ketz as second, to require that a parking plan be completed by Memorial y of 1991. Further, to require proof that t applicant can use the five spaces as propose c by Mr. Warren, the landlord, until suc time that the parking structure is completed. Also, to add a condition requiring a six -in nth review of the project. Further, if necessary at the s onth review, an extension could/be granted for completion of the parking structure so long as he five parking spaces are b provided. AYES: NOES: ABS/AIN: ABSENT: Comms. Ketz, Rue, Chmn. Ingell None None Comms. Moore, Peirce SS 90-5 — SPECIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD INSTALLATION OF CAR STEREO AND CAR ALARMS WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO C-3 PERMITTED USE LIST AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated August 1, 1990. Staff recommended adoption of the proposed resolution recommending amending the permitted use list in the C-3 zone to include "automobile audio equipment sales, installation, and/or repair" and "automobile alarm sales, installation, and/or repair" only with a conditional use permit. At the June 19, 1990, meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to set this matter for public hearing as soon as possible. P.C. Minutes 8/7/90 This issue was initially brought to the attention of the City from concerns noted by Mr. Sullivan in regard to the nuisances being created by a nearby alarm installation business. Currently, car stereo/alarm installers are operating in the City with business licenses. These businesses were granted approval under the general category of "automobile parts and accessories -- retail sales" when it was acceptable to allow uses which were generally similar. Obviously, as noted by Mr. Sullivan, the installation of alarms and stereos can cause a severe nuisance to neighboring residents and businesses, especially with the advent of new technology and the popularity of alarms and stereos with high noise volumes, such as boom boxes. In staffs judgment, these types of installations should be regulated and should be limited to the C-3 zone. Staff felt that a separate category is appropriate for purposes of clarification and also would include all such installation uses under one specific category whether or not they are a primary or secondary use. Secondly, the CUP review process would mean that such activities would be subject to the scrutiny of the Planning Commission in regard to such important concerns as the proximity of residential uses, whether or not the installation and testing would be conducted inside, and the hours of operation. Standard conditions of approval, such as prohibiting the manufacturing of boom boxes outdoors, could also be imposed. It was noted that the existing businesses with auto stereo/alarm installation activities will be subject to CUP review under the recently adopted amortization ordinance within two years of notice if this text amendment is adopted by the City. Public Hearing opened and closed at 9:08 P.M. by Chmn. Ingell, who noted that no one came forward to speak on this issue. Comm. Rue noted that the Commission has discussed this issue in the past, and it is something which needs to be done. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Ketz, to approve staffs recommendation, Resolution P.C. 90-66, as written. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Comms. Ketz, Rue, Chmn. Ingell None None Comms. Moore, Peirce TE1C1'E5 — TEXT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW OUTDOOR DISPLAY IN COMMERCIAL ZONES-- Mr. ONES Mr. Schubach ga aff report dated July 30, 1990. Staff recommend proposed resolution reco finding approval of outdoor display. At the June 2, 1987, meeting, the P ng Commissio merchandise was prohibited by Section 8-5 th doption of the ermined that outdoor display of ng ordinance. At the meeting of June 26, 1990, the C' • ouncil reques examine allowing outdoor displa .n private property. Staff had previously r ught this matter to the Planning Commission's atte t n because of .mbrthe increasingue of downtown merchants who were displaying merchandise tdoors. The dow own area had taken on a swap meet appearance, and the City was rece ng cow ants. hat the Planning Commission re- P.C. Minutes 8/7/90 Section 66463.5 of the Subdivision Map Act allows the Planning Commission to extend expirat n date for tentative maps for a period not exceeding three years. The applicant indicates that the reason for the delay was due to some financial problems which have recently been resolved. Since the zoning has not changed in respect to the subject property, and since the building is nearing completion, staff felt that it'would be appropriate to-e".ctend the map. Hearing opened and closed at 9:41 P.M byC Ingell, who noted that no one appeared to speak on this issue. • MOTION by Comm. Ketz, seconded by Chmn. Ingell, to ap rove staffs recommendation, to extend the tentative map one ear to July 19, 1991. AYES: Comms. Ketz, Moore, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ingell NOES: /None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None SS 90-5 -- TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD INSTALLATION OF CAR STEREO AND CAR ALARMS WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO C-3 PERMITTED USE LIST Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated June 12, 1990. Staff recommended that the Planning Corrunission direct staff to set this matter- for public hearing to add car stereo/ alarm '; installation to the C-3 or appropriate permitted use list, subject to a conditional use permit as soon as possible. Currently, there are car stereo/alarm installers operating in the City with business licenses. These businesses were granted approval under the general title of "automotive accessories." Staff feels that this type of use can be a nuisance and should only be permitted with a CUP. Staff noted that several letters have been received from Mr. Sullivan regarding noise problems associated with this use. Mr. Sullivan also feels that this use would be more appropriate in the M -zone . Comm. Peirce noted that this is an excellent example of the code becoming outmoded due to technological advances which were overlooked when the code was written. He noted the importance of being alert to such situations because many times certain uses become quite a nuisance. MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Chmn. Ingell, to direct staff to set this matter for public hearing as soon as possible. AYES: Comms. Ketz, Moore, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ingell NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None /0-- P.C. Minutes 6/19/90 PROJECT SS 90-5 • Text amendment to add installation of car stereo and car alarms with Conditional Use Permit to C-3 permitted use list. Mr. Robertson explained that this text amendment is a result of a complaint about an alarm installation business in the present C-3 zone. Planning has no objection to the change. Motion by Mr. Robertson to recommend a negative declaration. Second by Mr. Grove. No objections, so ordered. OJECT TEXT 90-5 Modi read cation of grade definition or amend Section 21A-2.1 sting grade". Mr. Rober -on explained to staff that this is a to amendment to clarify e oil code in relation to maximum hei. t of an oil tank structur Mr. Terry expres -d concern over the lack of anguage addressing oil tank tops. Mr. Grove advised sta that if we. were maximize the height, we ould be in p simple and clear to state hat all the 16 foot limit. Motion by Mr. Grove to recomm additional language be adde• to number of tanks shall be -pt to a installed so that the he ght of the appurtenances, does no exceed sixteen to pick a number to ential trouble, it's rtions of the tank be within a negative declaration and ction 21A -210D to read "The nimum and new tanks shall be k, including feet above existing grade. Second by Mr. Terr . No objections, so o •ered. Meeting Adjour -d. CERTIFICATI I hereb certify that the foregoing minutes are a trb- and compl= e record of the action taken by the Staff Revie Committee at tf eir regular meeting of July 5, 1990 en Robertson, -.717790 Dat Planning Commission 1315 Ualley Drive Hermosa Beach CA. Dear commissioners: June 19, 1990 I have decided to speak to you tonight For two basic reasons, The First has to do with expressing my gratitude to several City Officials namely Mr. Schuback, Mr.Wisniewski Mr.Grove and his very able building inspector, Mary Fehskens, and last but not least the best City Manager in the Southland Mr. Kevin Northcraft. Eight weeks ago I submitted a neighborhood petition which requested that the City resolve noise problems emanating From the installation of car alarm sirens and boom box stereos. In addition the business had other problems such as safety and using their parking lot as an extra work bench. I'm happy to say that today on a short term basis the neighborhood has a blissful peace and tranquil sheen about it. On the long term basis Mr Schubach's overworked group has once again provided what appears to be not only a blessing but an absolute miracle, that being. ..the problem is on tonight's agenda after only a Few short weeks. We in the neighborhood thank them and we also thank the Planning Commission and the City Council For providing the leadership and atmosphere which accomplished a tough task. The second purpose is to ask you to consider requiring shops that only deal in the sale and installation of stereos and car alarms to be placed in the "M" zoning area. With the exception of bakeries I see nothing in the code which would restrict M-1 zones to retail sales only. I'm sure we all have seen the M-1 window tinting shop signs which indicates that a retail store is somewhere between Valley and Cypress streets! The city code also states that "M-1" permitted uses are: Assembly of electrical appliances such as: a) Electronic instruments and devices Note..the area has a recording studio off valley. b) Radios & phonographs, including manufacturing of small parts such as coils. When you think about it that's exactly what a stereo shop does, they put components (speakers, sirens, amplifiers ect) together and assembly them for the customer. They are interchangeable. In addition the M zone allows or requires cabinetry shops..again that's what a stereo installation shop does, they make boom box speaker. cabinets. In case you decide against the M-1 zone the Following items should be considered in justifying the need to bring stereo and car alarm shops under a conditional use permit: Sec 10-2 of the code which deals with Conditional use permits (CUP) says: " General criteria For all uses in considering the granting of any conditional use permit..For any use, the Following criteria for granting said permit shall be considered"; 1) The distance From existing residential uses. (The only existing pure bread installation shop in Hermosa, shares three residential boundary lines and three sides.) 5) precautions taken by the owner or operator of the proposed establishment to assure the compatibility of the use with the surrounding uses. 3) noise, order, dust and /vibration that may be generated by the proposed use. Note..I don't believe more than boom box and cabinetry need to be said. In addition to the above...when your home resting From a hard days work and a tow truck drops a vehicle off with a defunct screeming car alarm or a guy with a bad alarm pull off PCH into the stereo shops parking lot and their either Full up or the shop just closed...or worse the employees don't care about the noise. IF a bunch of shiny boom box cars are waiting For their buddies in the stereo shop to get out of work ..That's when you know that more than a property boundary line is needed to stop the ...monster called .... UIPER " NO ONE DARES COME CLOSE" CAR ALARM. That's when you know that the several block Cthickness) of the "M-1" zone wouldn't be good enough but at least it might help. That's exactly why music bands now practice in the "M" zone, Please approve the "M" zone or at least consider a very tight set of conditions when approving a new installation shop in the City of Hermosa Beach. Please be advised that presently there are 10 empty ground level shops on PCH (not counting the new plaza), which could be someones neighborhood boombox nightmare tomorrow. Richard J Sullivan 024 3rd Hermosa Beach CA —13' Mr. William Grove Building Director 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach CA. • Dear Mr. Grove: June 3, 1,990 On April 23, 1SSO I delivered a petition signed by residence oF 3rd and Lfth Street requesting that the City DF Hermosa do something about the noise nuisance emanating From "Auto Systems" located at 320 PaciFic Coast Highway. Since that time the shop has been cited several times For violation oF City code as related to the parking lot. The basic problem oF noise pollution Cviolation of the basic 55 decibel.. level) has only been reduced in Frequency and not intensity. This is due to the restrictions on allowing cars to be worked on in the parking lot. When the young boys work on car inside the shop, which always has opened doors and windows, the noise is just as bad. The Failure to have these problems decisively resolved appears to be increasing the tensions among the employees and myself. Please be legally notiFied of the potential For conFrontation. We do understand the Cities position as related to the need to have due process and other Formalities, but..someone.must .be forgetting that the source of the problem, the repair and installation of car alarms, was never licensed or approved by city .hall. We believe Auto Systems should only be allowed to sell car radios at the present facility....EECAUSE THAT'S ALL THEY ORIGINALLY APPLIED FOR.. WE WOULD LIKE OUR CITY GOVERNMENT TO ISSUE AN IMMEDIATE CEASE AND DESIST ORDER FOR THE INSTALL- ATION AND REPAIR OF CAR ALARMS AND RADIOS. In addition, as you know Hermosa Beach "City Code" allows a 0:n.ghee.1.0 dfl3-:,:decibels-.noise- al lowance in the "M" zone. That fact and the intent of the discriptive wording of the Appendix A -zoning located on page 505 indicates that...without question "auto Systems" should be located in a "M" zoning district. Quote.." The M-1 zone is established in order to provide areas in the city within which a range of limited and restricted manuFacturing and wholesale business activities may be conducted. The limitations imposed upon such uses are intending to control the intensity of use and external eFFect upon surrounding areas, and to limit land uses to those which can be operated in a clean, orderly, odorless, pollution -Free, .-and-. quite manner CDrd. No. 06-665 ..1,12-16-66) Sec. 9-2 Permitted uses. In an M-1 zone, the Following uses are permitted: -Assembly oF.electrical appliances such as: a. Electronic instruments and devices; b. Radios and phonographs, including manuFacture oF small parts, such as coils; Bakeries, wholesale; Bottling; Cabinet shops, carpenter_shops or Furniture manuFacture; conditional use permit required subject to Article 10; Mr. Grove, unlike auto dealerships that occasionally install car alarms, radios or other* auto accessory....the only thing that Auto Systems does is assemble and install electronic appliances such as radios, alarms, horns, speakers and wood cabinet: (painted wood boxes) assemblies. A customer can pick piecemeal the electronic units he wants and Auto Systems will assemble and install it in the customers car. The Film I supplied you on May 1'f, 1890 speciFically showed the use oF the parking lot as a carpenters shop. Every day wood is being cut, sawed and made into speaker housing or alarm unit supports. On May 23, 1990 a. city inspector took a picture oF the parking lot being used as a carpenters shop. The picture should show a table saw with sawdust and cut wood laying all around. I will supply as much video Film as needed to prove and establish the point. I will even show the inspector taking the picture. Mr Grove, the reason Auto Systems belongs in the "M" zoning district is because it's right. Try to consider your Family listening to boom box music and hearing car alarms being tested all day. And when you come home From work you also have a couple oF hour to endure the noise. The shop stays open Cat least) till 7:30 three nights a week. The other Factor is that the shop draws the young kids like a magnet and this converts to playground type atmosphere with screeching tires, Fights and loud boom box music. I don't think you would put up with it as long as we have. "M" zone is the only description that completely and Fully describes the work being done at the Auto Systems Facility and I believe iF the Firm had indicated that they would be utilizing a wood working shop and an alarm installation shop when they First applied For a business license...I believe it would have been denied and they would have had to Find a place in the "M" zone. Mr. Michael Schubach Planning Director Hermosa Beach, CA. Dear Mr. Schubach: MAY 71990 Mau 7, 1990 On April 23, 1990 I wrote a letter to Mr. Northcraft which outlined a problem (nuisance) my neighborhood is having with "Auto Systems" located on the highway. Subsequently I recieved a letter from the City Manager indicating that your department is responsible For investigating the comp- laint. Since then, please be aware, that on at least two occasions I Felt compelled (endangered) enough to request police protection due to harassment From young gang or car club members that hang around (inside and out), the stereo and alarm shop Facility. The harassment includes setting oFF car alarms until I look out the window arjd then showing clinched Fist in a threatening gang style gesture. Having employees photograph me waiting For the postman. Sergeant Mitchell of the HBP has observed these young teenagers hanging around the business, he has observed Con video tape) young guus Cwith blue head bands) square off. to fight in the parking lot. He has also observed Con tape) the very same antagonist watching my patio window until I appear. He has also examined the tape For other unsaFe employee practices that I mentioned in my April 23rd and April 30 letters to Mr. Northcraft and Chief Wisniewski. Mr. Schubach, I want to make it clear that I'm presently on Social Security disability (totally disabled) and still under a doctor's care. It is quite unbelievable that my neighborhood would have to petition the City of Hermosa to bring a car alarm / stereo installation shop under a conditional use permit, something is drastically wrong! In anycase, the Fact is we have to.. but what I shouldn't have to put up with is the intimidation, harrassment or threats because we petitioned our government to do what should have been done Four years ago. A parking lot is For parking, an installation work shop is For installing customer purchases...not a car club or a gang hangout. Up to now the City has disregarded it's obligation and responsibility to protect (or at least warn) the employees, the unsuspecting customers, the employees in the next door- business oombusiness or the neighbors that live in houses 15, 25 and 30 feet away and abuts the property line...that their hearing may be impaired because we are allowing 120 decibel sirens to be installed right next to houses without any restrict- ions or conditions imposed. And if you Feel uncomFortable about that, dont worry about the gangs..just give the Police a call and we'll send one of our Few available oFFicers out to check the dB level...that's iF they test the alarm when the oFFicer is standing there with a sound meter in one hand and a citation book in the other. V AY '7 1990 It's been two weeks Cl5days) since I delivered mu letter to the City Manager and considering some oF the items mentioned in the First part of this letter one could possibly assume that the City of Hermosa isn't Falling over itself to correct a bad situation. Mr. Schubach, I don't believe any oF us want to be put through the wringer again like we did with the Hermosa Saloon donny brook. So Far no one has contacted me from your ofFice C I had called Officer Mitchell). I do believe that the agony could be lessened iF all parties concerned sat down together and discussed the problem and possible options. Why must we make this a tooth pulling aFfair?? I represent most oF my neigh- bors and I'm available to sit down with you or with you and the owner at any time. I would like to avoid a big extended hassle and why not ?? ...all you have to do is tell the owner oF "Auto Systems" what's legal and what's not, You wouldn't let the rental storage place next to City Hall start storing Furniture in the parking lot..would you? You didn't approve the mobil car wash as conceived because they couldn't close the doors to block out a 65 decibel air blower. .WE SIR HAVE A 120 decibel PROBLEM IN ADDITION TO SOME REALLY ROUGH AND TOUGH CNON-HERMOSA RESIDENCES) AND IF WE DON'T STOP IT NOW...IT COULD POSSIBLY GET BIGGER. The parking is easy because what iF all 5 businesses used the parking lot For a work shop...no one would be able to park..in addition I believe their lease agreement stipulates no working on cars in the parking lot. It might be that a master CUP already controls them. Mr. Schubach, I don't know why your ofFice hasn't visited Auto Systems yet..but I wish you would do it soon before it really gets out of control. I Feel I have done everything possible myself' to mitigate the problems...it goes away for a short time and then return with a vengeance. The only remaining solution is litigation and it seem that aFter this efFort it might be the only realistic course leFt. OE course the businesses use the deFense that the city gave us' a license sc it must be all right to operate in this manner. How could we have known it was wrecking your hearing, your mental health and taking away your basic right oF private property en,joument...not to mention the property devaluation due to the created nuisance and the cities permissiveness such as: lack oF business control and police patrols Cdue to manpower shortages). I hope this time we can work together to create a much better environment and a better citu. I do hope you recall the last letter I wrote to the Easy reader Cand was published 8i8S) complimenting you For a job well done. Please keep on a roll in resolving this problem. Richard Sullivan 82H 3rd Street C213) 3711-71110 C. C.. IAN R Nte 11% G.rw.C�' RECE.1vEu C- C- APR 2 31990 Kevin B. NcrthcraFt City Manager 1315 Ualleu Drive Hermosa Beach CA April 23, 1g50 Dear Mr. Nor thcraft: V 1 1990 Approximately Four gears ago Auto Systems, located at 320 Pacific Coast Highway, was granted a business license to operate a stereo sales and installation shop in cur city. For what ever the reason they were not required to comply with a conditional use permit. The time Frame appears to be within the Cities commitment to streamline the CUP procedures and to abate the neiborhocd/commercial zone problems. In addition to the stereo sales and installation the shop now sells and installs high decibel (120 db) alarm sustems. As uou know this decibel level is 60 to E5 dB higher than the cities 55 d5 commercial/residential maximum noise level. I am uncertain as to whether the code is to protect unsuspecting unknowable employees or Hermosa Beach citizens who might be in the shop or lobby as patrons. I do know that most experts agree that a decibel sound level oF 120 dB will damage the human ear. Over the last Few years I have been able tc negotiate a sporadic truce with the owner oF the shop. UnFortunatelu every time a new emplouees Cusually young kids) are hired...our neibcrhood has to go thru hell with a 120 dE siren going off inside and outside the shop. On several occasions I have called on Hermosa's building dept. to mitigate the noise. I do have video Film oF young employees cutting wood on a table saw with their unprotected eves a Few inches From the blade. The tape clearly shows the employee bent over close to the saw blade because it was after dusk Cthe citu street lights were on), the parking lot was dark and he couldn't see the cut line unless he bent over inches From the blade. On many occasions I have seen employees working under a hood when a 120dB siren went off in their ears. Wouldn't you guess that young employees are assuming that it must be safe and ok because the city gave their emplouer a license and lets them stay open. In addition, I believe the alarm shop thinks it's ok to work on cars right out in the parking lot..they do it every day and many times a day. In reality the park- ing lot is a communal parking lot that has to accommodate Five different business their employees and customers. Most customers oF the CD store have to drive around and around the block and on more than one occasion I've seen them double park or use; block a residence drive way. In conclusion, I believe the city of Hermosa Beach should immediatelu address Con an emergency basis), the Following questions that affect the quality of our lives. A) All business license applicants should be screen For the need to operate under a conditional use permit. Examples..Stereo/alarm shops Body repair shops Ears with bands or lute boxes Auto dealerships Businesses with parking problems Businesses with video games ,Car washes B) All businesses should outline and detail the type of work theu do, the machines they will use and any harmful or hazardous material Cpaint/glue etc.) or conditions their emplouees will be envolved with. In addition the applicant should be able to effect- ively demonstrate that he can comply with the "CUP". such as muffle alarms, provide goggles, close doors, use paint hoods or provide ample parking as needed. C) According to the applicants circumstances some of the "CUP" language should cover the Following: 1) Posted warnings of possible permanent ear damage to customers and emplouees within the building. 2) All windows and doors shall be close while cars are in the shops workino area. 3) Absolutely no work such as cutting, drilling, painting or installing stereo and alarm systems in the parking lot. '1) Outdoor incidental customer problem checks should only be done after the hood has been lifted and the horn or siren is muffled mechanically Cinsulated) or electron- ically (resistance shunt). B) The business applicant should certiFu that he has/will inFormed his employee as to the need to wear ear pro- tection and to his sole liability From law suites. 6) The CUP should state that loud or obnoxious noises will be considered a nuisance in the surrounding neighorhood and cause For withdrawal of the business license. D) The Citu should Find out why important items like this Fall through the crack. Chow do we learn?). This proper approach would lessen the chances of litigation or class action suites against the business or the city. Why should a citizen(s) have to petition city hall to do what should have been done Four years ago. A direct quote from my next door neighbor " the alarms are driving us crazy". I have attached a petition which indicates that most of Auto System's immediate neighbors Card & 'fth streets) want you to resolve these real life problems as soon as possible. Richard J. Sullivan 82'f 3rd Street Hermosa Beach CA Thank you. p.s. With the hot summer nights approaching we're begining to hear more and more of the Hermosa Saloon's rock & roll, Fri/sat night DANCE band. Obviosely the same old inForcement problems exist. I wonder if we might prevent a long hot summer by simply having the city send a letter to the owner and remind him of his duty to close all windows and doors while the band plays. vvey6 iu DA it U'gidC1811? vtic—. t xA Options range from calling the police to fling class-action lawsuits. By ROBERT J. BRUSS s there anything you don't like about the neighborhood where your home is located? Consider yourself very fortunate if you can't think of anything unfavorable. • But . if something disturbs your . quiet enjoyment, such as a nearby .smelly factory, a hazardous prop-• erty, a noisy business, a frequently barking dog, or perhaps a noisy airport, you may not have to toler- ate that nuisance any longer if you know how to abate it. • • Legal action can usually termi- nate or at least ameliorate the disturbing problem. In some situa- tions you can take action individu- ally. But other circumstances will require concerted action by you • and your neighbors. • If the neighborhood nuisance that disturbs you affects only a few • people, it is called a private nui- sance. A neighbor's all-night par- ties, trumpet playing at midnight, barking dog, or other disturbing • noise that does not bother a large 'number of people are examples. If the activity violates the law, then the police or other public authorities are the proper persons to stop the nuisance. However, if . the private nuisance doesn't in- volve a law violation, then your legal remedy is a lawsuit for an injunction to stop or limit the disturbing activity. Monetary dam- ages, such as for the reduced value of your property .due to the nui- sance, also can be awarded. Neighborhood Nuisance For example, suppose your home is near a late-night bar where the • rock band plays so loud that you can't sleep. Although the bar may be in a commercial zone, the fact that it disturbs you and perhaps a few neighbors too, means you may he able to enjoin the noise or at =least get a money award for the resulting loss of value to your : home. `But the offending party may have a valid defense. These in- clude: the plaintiff moved to the neighborhood knowing of the nui- sance and the nuisance has been tolerated for a long time. However, generally invalid private nuisance defenses include that there are other nuisances in the vicinity, the "- /) .'LJ(4 Cattle may not seem ideal neigh law, and there was a use permit or statutory approval for the offend- ing activity. The other type of nuisance is a public nuisance, which ).a. ffects a large number of people. Examples include a nearby dairy or cattle yard, smelly junkyard or dump, a noisy airport, an automobile or motorcycle race track or an activi- ty that attracts crowds of noisy people. There are several possible solu- tions to stop or modify a public nuisance. One is a lawsuit by • a public official, such as the city attorney, against the offender. Just before election time is when public officials become most interested in nuisance abatementjawsuits. . Another remedy is a lawsuit by a harmed individual, but this is often .beyond. an individual's.. financial means. Still another solution is a class-action lawsuit by all injured persons. Public -interest lawyers especially like such class actions because if they win, the legal fees can be large. The requested relief from a pub- 1990 — 22- 1d14 's i yy ^;Y Los Angeles Times ors to people who live in homes that were built next to a feed lot. ment, partial abatement, monetary damages or other settlement. For example, in response ' to airport noise abatement lawsuits, the air- port often buys up adjoining homes or insulates them against noise. After determining whether a private or public nuisance exists. the next step is to prove it to a judge or jury. Some activities, such as a house of prostitution are consid- ered "nuisances per se" and will almost always be abated by a court. But proving to the court that a neighbor is a drug dealer may be far more difficult. Or it may be hard to prove that a smelly factory, which emits odors just on certain days, is a public or private nui- sance. Good of Community a Factor Still another problem to ending nuisances is that courts are reluc- tant to abate nuisances that would cause massive economic problems, such as closing an offensive factory that employs hundreds of workers. Or ordering an outdoor movie the- ater to close just because a few neighbors object to noise and the traffic might not be considered good for the community. Still another consideration in, removing a neighborhood nuisance: is the statute of limitations. Most states have a three- or four-year statute of limitations for private nuisances. That means if the of- fending activity has existed longer than the applicable statute of limi- tations, then it is like a prescriptive easement. But some courts hold the statute of limitations starts running . again with each nuisance repeti- tion. However, there is no statute of limitations for public nuisances. Abating private or public nui- sances can improve the quality of life in your neighborhood. But it may not be easy to prove the 'nuisance and to overcome defenses that the defendant may have. However, if a nuisance is prevent- ing full enjoyment of your proper- - ty, consulting a real estate attorney about abating the nuisance is sug- gested. • Bruss is a San Francisco -area law- yer, author and real estate broker who writes each week for The Times on real estate topics. t c Citu of Hermosa Beach 1315 Dalley Drive Hermosa Beach, 9025'f !1Y, -i 1990 Please be advised that the following Hermosa Beach citizens respectfully petition the City to require Auto Systems (stereo & alarm shop), located at 320 Pacific Coast Hwy. to conform to all City code requirements. Conformance should be controlled with a conditional use permit (CUP) which mitigates employee and customer parking, employee safety and noise abatement. Name Address _3*.virel Ire )( J5, y/z/ V g Vi0c, e;724- c-7 51 90,2- & Sa (-I Q Date •, II 2/fit' 7L0 8'((o 3 g_o „.) //,?,),10 PIcgiSe re-f'vrrt "t"o 2, Li 3rd St'rce u.?hert Complete Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 5, 1990 City Council Meeting of September 11, 1990 APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS FOR ACQUISITION OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS SURPLUS LOTS AND TOXIC SURVEY ANALYSIS Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the signing of the acquisition agreement for purchase of the five Prospect Heights surplus lots for $250,000, and an agreement for a toxic survey of those lots, not to exceed $8,000. Background: Since March, 1989, the City and School District have been dis- cussing the purchase by the City of these five surplus lots adja- cent to Edith Rodaway Friendship Park, currently owned by the School District. Agreement as to the conditions of the sale has recently been achieved and the City Council appropriated funds for the purchase at their meeting of August 14, 1990. Analysis: The acquisition agreement would put into writing the agreement for the City's purchase of these lots from the School District. The language of the agreement has been reviewed by both agencies' attorneys, and is being finalized. It will be delivered to Coun- cilmembers as soon as possible. The escrow is to be completed within sixty days. The City is entitled access to the property during those sixty days to con- duct a toxic survey, and to cancel the purchase if toxic materials are found. Upon close of escrow, the City will accept the property in its current state. The District is retaining restrictions that would limit the use of the property to its current zoning, which is open space. Since this is the planned permanent use of the site, this is not deemed to affect in any way the City's purchase or use. In order to complete the toxic survey during the escrow period, it is appropriate to authorize an agreement to conduct this study as soon as possible. Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ld cc: City Attorney School District Superintendent Noted for fiscal impact: ,,) Viki Copeland Finance Director 1' E P - 1 0- 9 0 MC!N 1 4 : !,3 UL 1 'i ER . S T uE'v'ER . zt a I AGREEMENT FOR PIIRCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PJ OPERTY P. 0 2. 1 i THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of 1990, by and between HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT (hereinafter "Seller"), a California public school district in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, and the City of Hermosa Beach, an incorporated municipality in the County of Los Angeles, State of California (hereinafter "Buyer"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of certain property hereinafter described located in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California; WHEREAS, the Buyer desires to acquire said property for open space uses as defined by its local ordinance and Seller desires to sell said property on and subject to the terms and conditions contained herein; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, Seller and the Buyer agree as follows: ASSETS PURCHASED Seller hereby agrees to sell and convey to Buyer and Buyer agrees to purchase from Seller, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the following: 1.1 That certain property described on Exhibit A attached hereto (hereafter the "Real Property"); 1 SUPPLEMENTAL al INFORMATION H - 1 k.+- t-4 1 4 '.3 UL 1 hli 1 LIQ ,• hk: : c t 0. I 1 • F' . 6 1 1.2 All rights, privileges and easements appurtenant to the Real Property, excepting and reserving unto Seller, all mineral, oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances 500 feet below the surface of the Real Property and any easements, rights of way (including pass through rights and excluding surface drilling rights), appurtenant to the reserved mineral, oil, gas and hydrocarbon substances (all of which are collectively referred to as the "Appurtenances"). 1.3 Further reserving unto Seller the power to terminate this agreement, the right to reenter the property and repurchase it at the price paid by Buyer, or its current fair market value, whichever is lower, on the condition subsequent that the property ever be zoned for a purpose other than open space by act of Buyer, the people of the city of Hermosa Beach or any other means including but not limited to judicial action. 1.4 The Real Property, the Appurtenances, and Improvements are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Property." TERMS 2.1 The purchase price for the Property shall be two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000.00); 2.2 The Purchase Price shall be paid as follows: a. Within three (3) days after the date of execution of this Agreement by Buyer and Seller, Buyer shall deposit the sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) (the "Deposit") in escrow with a mutually agreed upon Escrow Holder. 2 • 1 H _ 1 The Deposit shall be held in an interest-bearing account and interest accruing thereon shall be held for the account of Buyer; b. Within three (3) days prior to close of escrow the Buyer shall deposit with the Escrow Holder for delivery to Seller at the close of escrow, the balance of the purchase price. c. On the Closing Date, the Deposit and the balance of the purchase price, less any amount owed to Buyer in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, shall be paid by Escrow Holder to or at the direction of Seller on account of the purchase price. d. At least three (3) days prior to the close of escrow, Buyer shall deposit or cause to be deposited with Escrow Holder, in cash or a certified or a bank cashier's check made payable to Escrow Holder company or a confirmed wire of transfer funds, the amount of Escrow Holder's estimate of Buyer's share of closing costs, prorations and charges payable pursuant to this Agreement. e. At least three (3) days prior to the close of escrow, Seller shall deposit the Grant Deed described herein into escrow. 2.3 At the Closing, Seller shall convey to Buyer title to the property in fee simple subject to condition subsequent by recordation of the Grant Deed, as defined herein, subject only to the lien for the real property taxes if any for the current fiscal year not yet due, the Seller's power of termination 3 - y u i•1 L.. 4 1 -4 `+ • '^ • • Z• 1. specified herein, and such exceptions to title as Buyer shall approve pursuant to Section 3.1. 2.4 Evidence of title to the Property shall be the issuance at Closing by title insurance company acceptable to the Buyer (the "Title Company") of a CLTA owner's policy of title insurance in the full amount of the purchase price, insuring fee simple title to the Real Property in the condition required by Section 2.3 and containing such endorsements as Buyer shall reasonably require. Indemnification of the Title Company to induce it to insure any otherwise unpermitted exception to title shall not be allowed except with the prior consent of Buyer after full disclosure to Buyer of the nature and substance of such exception and indemnity. 4 1-' — 1 Ll — 'y kJ I.1 I_' f.1 1 -a : 1,1 Li L 1 'v' Fi _, 1 1_1 t 'v' t t<: o r. I h' _ 4A c. 1 CONDITIONS TO CLOS/ 3.1 Buyer's obligation to purchase the Property under this Agreement is subject to the fulfillment and approval prior to the Closing of each of the following conditions, each of which is for the benefit of the Buyer and any or all of which may be waived by the Buyer in writing at its option: a. Delivery of title to the Property in the condition required by Section 2.3. b. A current CLTA preliminary title report with respect to the Property, accompanied by legible copies of all documents referred to in the report. c. A survey of the Property to be paid for by Buyer prepared by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer in sufficient detail to provide for the policy of title insurance described and required in section 3.1 above, certified to Buyer and the Title Company in form satisfactory to Buyer without boundary, encroachment, or survey exceptions which shall show the location of all easements and improvements. 3.2 The closing date may be extended, at Buyer's option by written notice to Seller, a reasonable period of time if required to allow satisfaction of all necessary conditions, subject to Buyer's further rights to terminate this Agreement upon the expiration of the period of any such extension if all such conditions have not then been satisfied. Should the closing date be extended, the "deposit" for purposes of paragraph 2.2(a) and 7.1 shall be increased by an additional $15,000. 5 Likewise, the closing date may be extended, at Seller's option by written notice to Buyer, a reasonable period of time if required to allow satisfaction of all necessary conditions stated in paragraph 3.4, subject to the Seller's further rights to terminate this Agreement upon the expiration of the period of any such extension if all such conditions have not then been satisfied. 3.3 a. The conditions contained in subsections a, b, and c, of section 3.1 are intended solely for the benefit of Buyer. If the Seller is unable to deliver title to the Property in the condition required by subsection a or if Buyer does not give its approval as provided in subsections b and c, of this section 3, Buyer shall have the right, at its sole election, either to proceed with the purchase of the Property in accordance with the terms hereof, or, in the alternative, to terminate this Agreement and obtain a refund of the Deposit plus all interest accrued thereon. In the event the Buyer elects to terminate this Agreement for failure of Seller to satisfy Buyer's conditions to close as provided herein, the Buyer and Seller shall pay any title and escrow charges, and neither party shall have any further rights or obligations under this Agreement. b. Seller's Conditions to Close contained in paragraph 3.4 are for the benefit of Seller and should Buyer fail to timely comply with the Seller's Conditions to Close Seller may, in its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement and retain the Liquidated Damages as provided in section.7. 6 For the o $eller's Obligation. bligation Conditioned upon 3.4 Conditions t of Escrow shall be a following the Close of each of th benefit of Seller► satisfaction a it being reed ag eof, the occurrenceSelland/or 's written waiver ther of, i t be Bellerconditions): timely of such co conditions (or all have ditimay waive any or all Buyer shall ons. this that Seller $uyer's obligations. by the terms °f a. required the obligations d by $oyer• All representations performed all of Agreement to be performed Representations• is Agreement Shall be Ag b. guy ler this Buyer to seller in warranties made by BuY C1°$e of gscr°w• "AS IS" an A and and correct as of the shall be conveyed in implied on true a property express or 3.5 The p or liability' set with warranty condition, other than as on no is con ti whatsoever, condition the Seller as to i makes no warranty, hazardous of Seller existence of the part this Agreement. st forth in s Agre he soil and the exi ertY• Buyer is t s to the condition of at or near said pr°p a cps on Of the review materials and substances and as of the expiration inspection► plying solely upon, cted, its own, independent as It deems necessar: r have condo o ertY period will Property r p fr°m Seller s of the i ation and analyse ins the Propertyconcerning investigation any and all matters in so acquiring or appropriate limitation, is not relying without 1 Buyer the co ins ► wl use of the property) • ts. agreemen condition and representations, statements, guidelines the represen descriptions, on any reports, ed y Seller or its any way up lens► rep Studies► p b warranties' or material furnish other information 7 representatives, whether oral or written, express or implied, of any nature whatsoever regarding any of the foregoing matters. Prior to the close of escrow, Buyer or Buyer's representatives shall have the right of access to the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of obtaining data and making surveys and tests, at Buyer's sole expense, necessary to carry out this Agreement. Buyer hereby indemnifies and holds the Seller harmless for any injury or damages arising out of any activity of Buyer, its agents, employees and contractors, performed and conducted on the Property pursuant to this Agreement. Buyer shall have access to all data concerning the condition of the Property in the possession of the Seller upon request. In the event that the property investigation and inspection report results are unacceptable to Buyer, Buyer shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Seller within forty-five (45) days after the opening of escrow, 0.1��/ ESTABLISHMENT OF ESCROW 4.1 Promptly after the execution of this Agreement, an escrow shall be opened to consummate the sale of the Property pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with escrow instructions of Buyer and of Seller (the "Escrow Instructions"), which instructions shall be consistent with the terms of this Agreement. 4.2 Seller and the Buyer shall open the escrow by delivering an executed counterpart of this Agreement and an executed Escrow Instructions, together with the Deposit to the 8 r . 1 tI - 1 Escrow Holder. CLOG} NQ 5.1 The Closing hereunder shall be held and delivery of all items to be made at the closing under the terms of this Agreement shall be made at the offices of the Title Company on or before a date not later than 60 days from the date of execution of this Agreement or such other date as Buyer and Seller may agree to in writing or as established by Buyer pursuant to Section 3.2 (the "Closing Date"). 5.2 On or before the Closing Date, Seller shall deliver or cause to be delivered to Buyer the following: a. A duly executed and acknowledged Grant Deed in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Deed"). 5.3 The Seller shall pay in full any assessments or bonds encumbering the property, if applicable. 5.4 The Buyer shall pay the fees for recording the Grant Deed. 5.5 The cost of a CLTA title policy shall be paid by Seller. Seller shall pay all documentary transfer taxes payable in connection with the recordation of the Grant Deed. Buyer and Seller shall pay, respectively, the Escrow Holder's customary charges to Buyers and Sellers for document drafting, recording, and miscellaneous charges. If, as a result of no fault of Buyer or Seller, Escrow fails to close, Buyer and Seller shall share equally all of Escrow Holder's fees and charges. 9 AEPREBENTATIONB AND w RRANTIEB 6.1 Buyer's Representations and Warranties. In consideration of Seller entering into this Agreement and as an inducement to Seiler to sell the Property to Buyer, Buyer makes the following representations and warranties, each of which is material and is being relied upon by Seller (the continued truth and accuracy of which shall constitute a condition precedent to Seller's obligations hereunder): a. Buyer has the legal right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, and the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement have been duly authorized and no other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. b. The representations and warranties of the Buyer set forth in this Agreement shall be true on and as of the Close of Escrow as if those representations and warranties were made on and as of such time. 6.2 Seller's Representations and Warranties. In consideration of Buyer entering into this Agreement and as an inducement to Buyer to purchase the Property from Seller, Seller makes the following representations and warranties, each of which is material and is being relied upon by Buyer (the continued truth and accuracy of which shall constitute a condition precedent to Buyer's obligations hereunder): 10 • 1 ti? - _! v 1• I ._I 11 1 -4 . L 1 : t r. .1 i t v t r.. • c r . 1 1 a. Seller has the legal right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, and the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement have been duly authorized and no other action by Seller is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. b. The representations and warranties of the Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true on and as of the Close of Escrow as if those representations and warranties were made on and as of such time. 6.3 Each party shall indemnify the other party and hold it harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, liabilities, costs, expenses, penalties, damages and losses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting from any misrepresentations or breach of warranty or breach of covenant made by such party to this Agreement or in any document, certificate, or exhibit given or delivered to the other pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement. The indemnification provisions of this Section 6.3 shall survive the delivery of the Grant Deed and transfer of title or, if title is not transferred pursuant to this Agreement, any termination of this Agreement. TERMINATIQ) 7.1 This Agreement may be terminated by Buyer without further liability in the event of a breach by Seller of any term, 11 LZ- r I• I L, r 4 1 -i : W '_! V L 1 v t h: I v '•; F. . 1 3 1 7 condition, or covenant contained herein. Upon election by the Buyer to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this section 7.1, the Deposit, plus all interest accrued thereon, shall immediately be returned to the Buyer. 7.2 If the Buyer defaults in any obligations hereunder, Seller's sole remedy shall be to rescind this Agreement and receive the amount of the Deposit specified at paragraph 2.2.a. as liquidated damages for such default. 7.3 Neither party waives the right of specific performance if permitted by law. THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES REFERRED TO ABOVE SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE Seller'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY IN DAMAGES. THE PARTIES AGREE THAT THIS IS A REASONABLE SUM CONSIDERING ALL OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING ON THE DATE OF THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE SUM TO THE RANGE OF HARM TO Seller THAT REASONABLY COULD BE ANTICIPATED, AND THE ANTICIPATION THAT PROVING ACTUAL DAMAGES WOULD BE COSTLY, IMPRACTICAL AND EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. IN PLACING THEIR INITIALS AT THE PLACES PROVIDED BELOW, EACH PARTY AGREES TO THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, AND CONFIRMS THE ACCURACY OF THE STATEMENTS MADE ABOVE AND THE FACT THAT EACH PARTY WAS REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL WHO EXPLAINED THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISION AT THE TIME THIS AGREEMENT WAS MADE. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PAYMENT OF SUCH LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, Seller SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED ALL OTHER CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OR RELIEF AT LAW OR IN EQUITY (INCLUDING ANY RIGHTS 12 o F' - 1 !J - ki ('1 U hl 1 4. 1 L1 Li L 1 c r-: . c 1 u t F• . 1 4 1 Seller MAY HAVE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 3389 AND 1680). BUYER SELLER Initials: Initials: GENERAL PROVISION$ 8.1 Time is of the essence of each provision of this Agreement in which time is an element. 8.2 Any notice required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed to have been given, served and received if given in writing and personally delivered or either deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt required, or sent by telegram, telex, overnight delivery service or facsimile transmission, addressed as follows: SELLER Attention: BUYER Attention: 13 t F-• — 1 kJ— vi 1--4 1 -r : 1 0 0 L 1 ••: t F"‹ •o 1 u t ••: t n;• c t. • z 1 1-• . 1 1 Any notice personally given or sent by telegram, telex or facsimile transmission shall be effective upon receipt. Any notice sent by overnight delivery service shall be effective the business day next following delivery thereto to the overnight delivery service. Any notice given by mail shall be effective three (3) days after deposit in the United States mail. 8.4 Seller and Buyer each hereby agree that no real estate broker has been retained by either party in relation to this transaction. If any claims for brokers' or finders' fees for the consummation of this Agreement arise, then Buyer hereby agrees to indemnify, save harmless and defend Seller from and against such claims if they shall be based upon any statement or representation or Agreement of Buyer, and Seller hereby agrees to indemnify, save harmless and defend Buyer if such claims shall be based upon any statement, representation or Agreement made by Seller. 8.5 Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument. executed by the Seller and the Buyer. 8.6 This Agreement shall be governed by and the rights, duties and obligations of the parties shall be determined and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 8.7 If either party files any action or brings any proceedings against the other arising out of this Agreement, or is made a party to any action or proceeding brought by the title 14 company, then, as between Buyer and Seller, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover, in addition to its costs of suit and damages, reasonable attorneys' fees to be fixed by the court. The "prevailing party" shall be the party who is entitled to recover its costs of suit, whether or not suit proceeds to final judgment. No sum for attorneys' fees shall be counted in calculating the amount of a judgment for purposes of determining whether a party is entitled to its costs or attorneys' fees. 8.8 No waiver by any party of any provision of this Agreement shall be considered a waiver of any other provision or of any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision, including the time for performance of any such provision. The exercise by a party of any remedy provided in this Agreement or at law shall not prevent the exercise by that party of any other remedy provided in this Agreement or at law or in equity. 8.9 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns. 15 E F 1 - y V 1•1 V rJ 1 -a . 1_ lJ L 1 t f<: a •v h: c- *. .. i F• . 1 7 1 8.10 The captions contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation hereof nor serve as evidence of the interpretation hereof, or of the intention of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first above written. BUYER: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By: Seller: HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT By: 16 August 30, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council September 11, 1990 PROSPECT SCHOOL HOUSE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission that Council approve the use of Prospect School as a storage facility for items currently held at the Community Center and that it be restored and maintained as a two room school house in line with its historical significance. BACKGROUND At the July 10, 1990 Council Meeting, the Parks Recreation and Community Resources Commission recommended that Council approve the usage of the Prospect School House as a City storage facility. At that time, Council directed the Commission to review this issue again to determine if there were more appropriate uses for the site than storage. Staff was directed to report on the present need for storage space in the City. ANALYSIS At their July 25 Meeting, the Commission indicated that their previous review of the issue which had included neighborhood input resulted in their recommendation for utilizing the building for City record storage. The Commission further requested that staff submit to Council the final list of alternatives that were considered by the Commission prior to making the recommendation to use the space for City storage. A table indicating the review the Commission made of the most seriously considered alternatives is attached for Council review. As indicated previously, the Commission feels strongly that. parking limitations and the location of the School House (adjacent to a neighborhood) leaves them with few viable alternatives. With the need for improvements to many City parks and recreation facilities, the Commission also expressed a concern that addressing the parking need for anything but a low impact use would place an undue financial burden on the City. The City storage facility idea evolved from this perspective as it was determined to be the lowest impact activity among the alternatives considered. It was felt that with sufficient shelving and design, the City records (currently stored in the Community Center locker rooms ) could be maintained in a more secure fashion than they are at the present. In evaluating the City departments' needs for space, it was determined that the current total square footage being used for record storage is approximately 900 square feet. The Prospect 9 School House is approximately 2000 square feet and would be more than adequate in providing for the current and expanding storage needs. Additionally, the Commission felt that the remaining space could be used for storing larger items (such as holiday decorations). The Community Resources Department could utilize the newly available space in the Community Center locker rooms for storing recreation equipment. With attention to clean-up and organization, the space could also serve as and area for craft classes and/or artist studio space. It is conceivable therefore, that the use of Prospect School as a storage area may in fact indirectly create more space for recreational activities. As it will require the minimal level of renovation to meet the needs of a storage facility, this use would not impair the future ability of the City to use the building for something else. Once this alternative or another is selected by Council, staff will proceed with the re -roofing and renovation project utilizing community donations and previously appropriated City funds as necessary. Respectfully Submitted, Mary C R ey, Director Dept. .f ommunity Resources Concur: Kevin B. Northcr/aft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Freeing space in the Community Center should be for the purpose of expanded recreational or work space and not for other storage. PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COt1MISSION MINUTES OF JULY 30, 1990, MEETING ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Crecy, Commissioners Blaco, Fish Staff: Rooney Absent: Reviczky, Peirce Guests: Lori Walpole/Sandpipers Carla Roberts/Sandpipers MINUTES . Motion: "To approve as submitted." Blaco/Fish All Ayes PROSPECT SCHOOL HOUSE COMMITTEE Motion: "Return to Council with recommendation to use building for storage. Include list of alternatives reviewed by Commission/committee previously. Convey the concerns Commission has regarding parking and the financial burden expanding parking may place on the City." Fish/Crecy All Ayes SANDPIPERS Motion: "To waive clean-up fees of $400 and damage deposit fee of $500 for Civic Theatre rental on Oct. 2, Nov. 13, 1990, Jan. 15 and March 12, 1991." Blaco/Fish All Ayes CIP PROJECT/MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Motion: "To reschedule this item for the August 29, 1990 Commission meeting." Crecy/Blaco All Ayes PROSPECT PARK Motion: "To receive and file report." Fish/Blaco All Ayes CLARK STADIUM BASKETBALL COURTS Motion: "Review and recommend approval of the plans and specifications for CIP 89-512, Basketball Courts at Clark Field, to the City Council and recommend to City Council that additional local funds from CIP 89-506, the Park and Recreation Facilities Tax Fund, be approved to provide the lighting for the courts." Fish/Crecy All Ayes IMPACTS LISTED FROM LOW TO HIGH FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED: PARKING NEEDS (SPACES NEEDED) CITY STAFF NEEDED TO MAINTAIN AND/OR MONITOR USE CITY OFFICES Low (4) Medium WOULD BE SUPPORTED Low BY THE COMMUNITY (TO RAISE FUNDS) IMPACT ON Low NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY BENEFITS Medium BACK YARD USES: Parking Parking Landscaping/picnic area/Recreational The minimum refurbishment Yes needed for the building is: Roof, floor, doors, windows, heat, electrical, plumbing, and handicapped access. YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER MEETING HALL PROSPECT SCHOOL VARIOUS TYPES OF USES LEASE LEASE SCHOOL PRE-SCHOOL DIST. Low (4) High Medium Medium High Very High Medium (4-10) Low (4) (40) High Low High Medium Landscaping Parking Recreation Picnic Yes Yes Low Low Low Low Medium High Parking NON-PROFIT RENTALS BY PERMIT Medium (6) High Low Low Medium Low Medium Parking Parking Yes Yes Yes HISTORICAL STORAGE MUSEUM Low (1-2) Low (0-4) Low Low Low Low High Low Medium High Optional Landscaping Recreation Picnic Roof/ Floor/ Electrical Only Yes (1) (m) (n) (0) (p) Recommendation to authorize staff to assi•n liti•ated tort claims for defense with firms recommended b the Cit is Liability Claims Administrator. Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated July , 3 . from 1 199099. Recommendation to a..rove use of the Prosect School House as a stora•e facilit for items currentl held at the communit center and that it be restored and main- tained as a two room school house in line with its his- torical significance. Memorandum from Community Resour- ces Director Mary Rooney dated July 2, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Sheldon for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To refer this item back to staff and the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission for addi- tional review, and a neighborhood residential survey, to determine if there are more appropriate uses for the Prospect School House site than as City record storage, and, to direct staff to report on the need for City record storage. Motion Sheldon, second Mayor Creighton. So ordered noting the objections of Essertier and Midstokke. Recommendation to deny recruest for Skate the Beach 10K Cruise. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated July 2, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Sheldon for separate discussion later in the meeting to consider rescheduling the event at a time other than the peak summer usage months. Action: To approve the staff recommendation the request. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Creighton. So noting the objection of Sheldon. Addressing the Council on this matter was: Mark Conte - 2203 Curtis, Redondo Beach Recommendation on City Prosecutor replacement. Memoran- dum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated June 27, 1990. and deny ordered, Recommendation re. updated appraisal for South School. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated July 5, 1990. Page 4 Minutes 07-10-90 c7C7-e- ;9,<' dee , ate• E 1.O 2' ,71 V BEDRM 1 P-3 1/2 SITTING 7-9 1/" n 1 BATH 1 1/4-) • 8( bl HALL 127V 11275. !I W Ir 60141.6P \I 1 'SJPEP BATH' I5 I BEDRM 2 a 4 ( 1 BATH 2� ON2 Htt iI!;I t ' 2" tlBEDRM 3 A-1 '/S 'P auJ. E.6 5_ 4'-V c 13'-3 I/2 13•-9 1/7 2' I� / x.. K 21•-D' 16'-6' DECK 15t ,iE :-U.) 5'-6' 0 Xi rE L I. k,- 4 OREAT RM OPEN 40 '"EMMY wow' DINING P 7 — 4-r jci NOOK r - KRONEN ' 1.4-5 , 11-1 n I y L ur.—'y� ., -1- j I UP j C.68. 103 75 w 506 BA 9 6-G r 90 DEN/GUESY 14'-E 1/Y 28 -V } SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1207 Sq. FEET LIVABLE SCALE: 1/4€a1'-Ot 5•$ 24'-v n , r K 12' l6• 6 At. Fit I up Y Zji V 7� n mos' nus rV ♦9\c SHOP E-lM Of 1PSj 4,R 183413 14) 4 T -4 Thv 2 -CAR GARAGE £LEV 9458 0 DOORS 1P"M. 3o.5 ou / / 1 ENTRY -6' c1/4' U° I I II S I b I I 1 1 44 I 1 1 PC Enta EPs :nx) 1 BASEMENT/BTOR FLFV 9475 3 0 1 I— c i ri °� '� BATH�4 \ Y le -5• 2V -0 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 1287.8 Sq. FEET LIVABLE SCALE: 1/1'=1'-d i< W 6 0 - V V 220.5 Sq. FEET LIVABLE 677.5 Sq. FEET GARAGE 172.7 Sq. FEET STORAGE SCALE: V4"s:{.0' 6 Y 0 Ot' a• as • • 0 • 5 0 • d4 >0 • j z0 F• m 5 >0 a2 0 G0 °0' a ( Ria 1 374-0783 0 & MRS. ROBERT CITELLI aa.9009