The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/11/90Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council i December 3, 1990 City Council Meeting of December 11, 1990 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS January 8, 1991 7/30 6 mo. review of Farmers' market Cable TV Franchise ascertainment review and renewal action Plan Appeal of CUP at 619 10th St. 11/6 Extension of Macpherson Oil lease Council 11/13 Action Plan for Wave Improvement Recycling bid award Water Service - Franchise fees and acquisition option Recommendation for speed bumps on El Oeste Appeal of denial by P.C. for variance at 40 Seventh Court (hearing date postponed from 11-27 at request of applicant) Appeal of Planning Commission decision on Manhattan Avenue condos Conceptual approval of Greenbelt steps Greenbelt crossing at school. RFP for Computer system. Council 8/14 Obtain consultant's Contract for Street Lighting/Crossing Guard Assessment Districts Community Resources Dir. General Services Director Planning Director/City Clerk City Manager Planning Director Building & Safety Dir. City Manager Public Works Director Planning Director Planning Director Public Works Director Public Works Director General Service Director Gen. Service Director Public Works Director ' (see map), yo.ay buy an annual PARKING PERMIT, which allows parking with minimal restriction. The cost of the permit is $20. Contact the General Services Department. Residents can buy annual Parking Permits (one permit per vehicle registered locally) that allow drivers to park at yellow pole meters without paying the meter or observing the one- hour -limit restriction. Employees working in Hermosa Beach can also buy such permits. Visitors to Hermosa Beach can buy a one -day version of this permit. NOTE: this permit does NOT allow a vehicle to be parked duringthe days and hours posted "No Parking;' nor can anyone park for more than 72 hours at one location. Residents can buy a Guest Parking Permit (one per house- hold) for the use of visiting friends. WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU BREAK A LAW? You can be cited and fined. Your car could be towed away. If you have five or more outstanding parking citations, a wheel of your car may be equipped with a device called a "Denver Boot;' which makes driving impossible, for a period of up to 72 hours. (This method of impoundment at least saves you the expense of paying towing charges.) After 72 hours—or if the boot does not fit the wheel of the offending car, or if the vehicle. is parked so as to endanger public safely—the car will be towed. If your car is booted or towed, you must either pay the cita- tion or post bail and arrange a court date. To get your car back, contact the General Services Department at City Hall (in the basement of the building). If General Services is closed, the Police Department (540 Pier Avenue, 376-7981) can help you. If you think that you were unfairly cited, or that your car was unfairly impounded, you can contest the action. An Administrative Hearing officer can hear your citation complaint. (This saves you time—weeks spent waiting for a court date and then hours in traffic court.) The decision of the hearing officer is based on the legal and technical aspects of the case, as well as any mitigating circumstances. Hearing hours are Tuesday afternoons from 1:00 to 4:00, and Thursday evenings from 5:00 to 9:00, excluding holi- days. The hearings are held in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive. If you disagree with the hearing officer's decision, you may contest the citation at South Bay Municipal Court. You will have to post bail in the General Services Department of City Hall, and a court date will be arranged. If you want to contest the impounding of your vehicle, re- quest a hearing within ten days of the date on your Notice of Impound. Contact the Hermosa Beach Police Department by phone, letter, or in person. If you win your case; the City will be responsible for the towing and storage costs. 000060066606660696,:691,0,069069604666009696 We hope you'll always find a convenient parking space. We're glad to have you visit our city, and we mean ,it when we say WELCOME TO HERMOSA BEACH ! CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 (213) 376-6984 A GUIDE: THE DOS AND DO NT5 OF PARKING IN Hermosa Beach CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Hermosa Beach is a friendly citi d we wel;;om2 visitors. But we're small—only 1.3 square miles of land area—and 20,000 people live here year-round. When we have 100,000 visitors, as often happens on weekends and holidays, then we have parking problems—particularly near the beach, in what we call the "impacted area: So we must have parking rules. RESTRICTED BEACH PARKING READ METERS and SIGNS PACIFIC COAST IS Go Shopping I!! z MERCHANT a co VALIDATED 1- PARKING IN LOTS HIGHWAY Fn. ARDMORg COMMUNITY CENTER AVENUE Police Ei INTER im-LIBRARY VALLEY DRIVE CITY#IALL s >''BOULEVARD :M� �F AMBER of COMMERCE 9L AND WALKWAY �� , �BEACH. FRONT ARE°A' aVEt+ItyE sk (Lvtm*" BIIKE<PATH ti N - "T IFEGUARD HDOTRS'' PIER The Impacted Area lies between the north and south borders of the city, and extends from the beach on the west to Loma and Morningside Drives on the east. We've tried to be fair to everyone in writing our parking rules. We believe we have been. And we think irs fair to warn you that our parking laws are strictly enforced. We'll tell you first of all where you may NOT park. That way, you can avoid the inconvenience and expense of being ticketed or towed. DON'T PARK: o In ALLEYS, except in marked parking stalls. Vehicles load- ing and unloading may park for 15 minutes, but their flashers must be on. (Residents whose garages face onto the alley may, of course, park on their own property be- hind the red lines.) o ANYPLACE during the hours when the signs indicate No Parking. We need those hours to clean and maintain streets. (Commercial vehicles may park just long enough to make pickups or deliveries.) o WHERE YOU BLOCK SOMEBODY'S DRIVEWAY, either by being in it or in front of it. Exception: if it's a driveway that you own or lease, you can park in front of it if you have a permit from the General Services Department at City Hall. vTheDermit, in effecas long as you own, rent, or lease the property, costs $27.50. o On the SIDEWALK, or on the PARKWAY AREA (usually grass or brick) between the sidewalk and the curb. Note: even if you're parked in your own driveway, make sure your vehicle doesn't block the sidewalk. You must leave three feet of unobstructed clearance for pedestrians, or your vehicle can be ticketed. • In HANDICAPPED spaces, unless your vehicle displays a "disabled person" license or official placard. These spaces are marked by BLUE PAINT on the curb or edge of the paved portion of the street, or by signs. o In RED ZONES, ever. Pay careful attention to the paint on the curb. o In YELLOW ZONES, usually. These are for loading or unloading goods (commercial vehicles, 20 -minute limit; passenger vehicles, 3 -minute limit). This rule is enforced between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m., Monday through Saturday; it isnot enforced on Sundays and holidays. o In WHITE ZONES, usually. These are for loading or un- loading passengers (3 -minute limit) or depositing mail in mailboxes. If the white zone is in front of a hotel or mail- box, you may not park there at any time. In most other cases, the rules are enforced only between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and not at all on Sun- days and holidays. If the white zone is in front of a theater, the rules apply only when the theater is open for business. Again, please obey these rules. They WAl�e enforced. HERE'S WHERE YOU MAY PARK: o At METERS (when paid), except during hours specified "No Parking: At poles painted yellow (these are in residential areas), parking rules are enforced 24 hours a day. At poles painted silver (these are in commercial areas), rules are not enforced during certain night and early -morning hours, usually between 8 p.m..and 9 a.m. But check the meters for exact hours. Even when you park legally at a meter during the daytime, there are limits on how long you may stay there; usually one or two hours. To give everyone an equal chance to park, these time limits are enforced. o In ONE-HOUR ZONES, with permit. o In GREEN ZONES, but only for 15 minutes. This applies between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m., every day. o There are several REMOTE PARKING LOTS where you may park free of charge. o There are THREE LOTS in the DOWNTOWN shopping area that display "Validation" signs. You may park in these for up to four hours and shop. Many stores will validate your parking ticket for the amount of time you spend in the store. You must pay the parking lot attendant for any un - validated time on your parking ticket, at the posted rate. If you live or work in the impacted area of Hermosa Beach • Water Service - Franchise fees and Acquisition option City Manager January 22, 1991 7/24 Review Rule XV & parking fees for employees in 6 months Personnel Director. 8/20 Gann limit - Appropriations subject to Finance City Manager General Services Dir. Annual report and review of City Goals Recommendation on telephones in Right of way. Street rehabilitation and slurry seal call for bids, CIP 89-114 and. CIP 89-170 Public Works Director February 12, 1991 Mid -year Budget Review Finance Director March 12, 1991 Historical Society relocation alternatives Community Resources Dir. Utilization of Prospect School House Community Resources Dir. March 26, 1991 Goal 2 5/16 Options to direct dial to City Hall Gen. Svcs. Dir. ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Public Works Director Vehicle parking on pedestrian streets Public Works Director Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Planning Director Council 11/13 Place Biltmore referendum equivalent on next election Planning ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date - 2 - Council Council Goal 4 Goal 7 5/8 Discuss financial arrangements on oil project 5/8 Re. oil project CUP define "temporary" as relates to height of project 5/16 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function 10/17 Review Fiesta cost/benefit Goal 8 5/16 Options to increasing service level of. street sweeping City Mgr. 7/24 3 -hr. vs. 2 -hr. parking meter limit in the downtown (refer to VPD) Council 8/14 Council 8/14 City Mgr. 8/22 City Mgr. 9/4 Review of standard CUP conditions Review ways to enforce no parking in front yards Joint meeting with Chamber o Commerce Recommendation on Council Chamber chairs Council 10/9 Map and time schedule for street sweeping Council 10/30 Beach volleyball court report Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Dept. 11/5 RFP for Traffic Engineer Dept. 11/5 Approval Process for South School Conceptual Design Council 11/13 Place Biltmore referendum equivalent on next called election City Mgr. Planning Dir. Finance Dir. Finance Dir. Public Works Dir. Gen. Svc. Dir. Planning Dir. Public Works Dir. City Manager Finance Director Public Wks. Dir. Public Works Dir. Public Works Dir. Public Works Dir. Comm. Res. Dir. Planning Dir. --f) R F-py D MINUTES OFTHEREGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, December 11, 1990, at the hour of 7:35 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 6:3 P.M. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) regarding matters of litigation: LaFay vs City of Hermosa Beach; Government Code Section 54956.9(b) regarding matters of potential litigation; and, Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property negotiations for City yard lease/tidelands oil lease with Macpherson Oil. The session was adjourned at 7: P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Essertier, k3e, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon Absent: None raa) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -, J Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". /-acAz CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matterswill be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3. Creighton: Essertier: Midstokke: Wiemans: Mayor Sheldon: 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (j) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: ( ), and ( ) Motion . , second So ordered. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 27, 1990. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 35391, 35392, 35393, 35394, and Nos. 35396 through 35523 inclusive, noting void warrants Nos. 35397 through 35412 inclusive, and No. 35455; and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. (Please note: Computer malfunction caused warrant Nos. 35397 through 35410 to be voided) (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the November, 1990 Monthly Investment Report (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #46903 for an 11 -Unit Condo at 603 First Street. Memo- randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 3, 1990. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-54.25, entitled, HA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP #36903 FOR AN ELEVEN -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 603 FIRST, STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." (f) (g) (h) Recommendation to modify the conditions in the CUP for Robert's Liquor located at 74 Pier Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 28, 1990, with revised Resolution for adoption. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To adopt Revised Resolution No. 90-5357, enti- tled, HA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ON APPEAL FOR 74 PIER AVENUE, ROBERT'S LIQUOR, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 14, BLOCK 12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT." Motion , second . So ordered. Recommendation to review Final Housing Element document. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 3, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To receive and file the revisions to the Final Housing Element Document. Motion , second So ordered. Recommendation to approve lease agreement with Project Touch for Room "'Cu. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 3, 1990. Action: To approve the agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch to lease Room "C" in the Community Center; (312 square feet x $.77) for $240 per month, from January 1, 1991, to June 30, 1991; and, (312 square feet x $.80) for $250 per month, from July 1, 1991, to December 31, 1991. (i) (7) Recommendation to accept and file report re. Christmas Tree recycling plan. Memorandum from Building & Safety Director William Grove dated December 3, 1990. Action: To and file the agreement between Browning-Ferris and the City of Hermosa Beach to have a Christmas tree special pick-up for the entire City on Saturday, December 29, 1990, so the trees could be shredded and used as composting for a landfill. There would be no extra charge for this service. Recommendation to receive and file Community Center lease policy. Memorandum from Community Resources Direc- torMary Rooney dated December 4, 1990. Action: To receive and file. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES ORDINANCE NO. 90-1052, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO A PROVI- SION REGULATING THE PARKING OF TRAILERS, SEMI -TRAILERS, CAMPER TRAILERS, AND RECREATIONAL TRAILERS." For adoption. Motion C , second E . So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items ( ) and ( ) were discussed at this time but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter from Roger Bacon re. traffic problems at Park Pacific Shopping Center, dated November 19, 1990; con- taining letter from Tom Gast, Director of Real Estate, Alpha Beta Company. (Staff Action: Referred to Traffic Committee). Supplemental letter from Janet E. Congle- ton, Manager of Security Pacific Bank, 1100-5 P.C.H., dated November 18, 1990. ) -- V e =. -1J v; /0 - PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPEAL AT 588 TWENTIETH STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 4, 1990. Director Schubach presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened. Coming forward to address the Council were: The public hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 90-54.2�o, entitled, HA_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A THREE LOT SUBDIVISION AND, INSTEAD, AP- PROVING VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21943 FOR A TWO LOT SUBDIVISION AT 588 20TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHWESTERLY 1331 BY 120.75 PORTION OF LOT 9, BLOCK 71, SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH."" Motion E., second C . So ordered. 6. RECONSIDERATION OF PARAMEDIC FEES. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 3, 1990, with Resolution for adoption. Director Copeland presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. r // The public hearing was opened. Coming forward to address the. Council were: ((/), The public hearing was closed. Action: To adop R solution No. 90-54 , entitled, SIA_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUT NO. 905422, TO CHANGE FEES FOR PARAMEDIC RESPO E.”, with language inserted in Section 1. to read, " Motion AL), second E. So ordered. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. SANITARY SEWERS REHABILITATION TARGET AREA 4, CIP 88- 406. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony An- tich dated December 5, 1990, with supplemental letter received November 19, 1990, from Colich and Sons, 547 West 140th Street, Gardena, CA 90248. (a) Award of Sanitary Sewer Construction Contract. Director Antich presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Select the construction contract time for this project as$20 calendar days; 2) Waive the irregularity in Colich & bid for 120 calendar days thereby saving $12903, said action being in the best interest of the City. 3) Authorize the Mayorto sign a contract with Colich & Sons (JV) for Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project, Capital Improvement Project 88-406 in the amount of $1,627,996. 4) Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within the budget limitations. X74 ve Motion e, second Com. So ordered. xo (b) Award of Sanitary Sewer Inspection Contract Director Antich presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: 1) 2) To approve the staff recommendation to: Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with BSI Consultants, Inc. for contract administra- tion and inspection services. Authorize a not to exceed amount for BSI as follows: Inspection Soils Testing Contingency Not toExceed Amount Authorize staff to issue within budget limitations. $ 45,200 11,460 5,660 $ 62,320 addenda as necessary Motion , second 6'. So ordered. 8. CITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 89-90. Memo- randum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated Decem- ber 5, 1990. Director Copeland presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. (a) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (including report of independent auditor). Action: To receive and file Motion , second So ordered. (b) Letter to management from auditors. Action: To receive and file Motion , second So ordered. p?) 9. STRAND SAFETY MEASURES - ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW STRAND COMMITTEE. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated December 4, 1990. Director Wisniewski presented the sponded to Council questions. 0 Action: staff report and re - /e7 e9 Motion , second . So ordered. 7)7 /75, �; yv /1/27 10. GENERAL SERVICES' PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM AND CITY- WIDE PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM. Memo- randum from General Services Director Cynthia Wilson dated December 5, 1990. Director Wilson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. ev Action: To approve the staff recommendation to ap- propriate funds in the amount of $7,667 from the Parking Fund to initiate the first of two phases of the Public Information Program for General Services (G.S.) Depart- ment, to include: 1) Change the name from Parking Enforcement to Community Services; 2) Change the current Officer uniforms a cost of $2967; 3) Establish one-to-one dialogue with merchants, Chamber of Commerce, to blue at businesses, and City Commissions; 4) Participate in local Neighborhood Watch groups, schools, and other organization(s) meetings; 5) Advertisements, posters and a twenty page public information booklet detailing parking "Do's and Don'ts" for a cost of $4500; 6) Provide in-house training and materials at a cost of $200; 7) Increase officer and supervisor accountability; and, 8) Provide periodic updates to Council on the sta- tus of the program. Motion , second So ordered. 11. RECOMMENDATION FOR. TRIAL PROGRAM FOR ELECTRONIC HAND HELD CITATION WRITERS. Memorandum from General Services Director Cynthia Wilson dated December 5, 1990. Director Wilson presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve thestaff recommendation for the purchase of continuous form citations at a cost of $11,400 from the Parking Enforcement Office supplies account. The Clancy Hand Held Citation Writing System will be provided at no additional charge, on a four month trial basis (March - June, 1991), with the cita- tion purchase. Motion 6, second So ordered. 12. RECOMMENDATION FOR A TASK FORCE FOR DEVELOPING CONSENSUS FOR A HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (NEW POLICIES OF DEVELOPMENT). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 28, 1990. Director Schubach presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au- thorize creation of a task force program; provide addi- tional fundin• at mid -year budget for extensive adver- tising; and, to advertise for task force applicants. Motion d, second -. So ordered.4:7 =egr"--Z A 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Northcraft reported 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Council were: 3� ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of he City Council of the City of ,Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Wednesday, December 12, 1990, at the hour of '----A7M 'to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tues- day, January .8, 1991, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Adjournment was in memory of Edward Edwards former council member and Mayor from 1954 to 1956. Note: The December 11 meeting is the only scheduled regular City Council meeting in December. Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wesdnesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by a City 'Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Moil 7 Thurs.; Closed, Fridays. There is no smoking,, allowed in:the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for 'carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for, meetings of -the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote, approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion: Public Hearings ..: Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to, appear and formally express their views 'rega'rding' the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing: Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The 'first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, rejector hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters :..'Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City; Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports City-;ManagerThe City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the �`attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared onthe preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports City Council .. Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council .:. These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication' of the Agenda. L N'‘(< (-71-L '`(e -` 1-L4. ,90 — /a33 "It is better to wear out than to rust out" - R. Cumberland AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, December 11, 1990 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR 6 --Chuck Sheldon MAYOR PRO TEM ,.6 --Kathleen Midstokke COUNCILMEMBERS /—Roger Creighton .2- Robert Essertier 9. Albert Wiemans Closed Session - 6:00 P.M. Regular Session - 7.:30 P.M. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. During the meeting, a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of. the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) (f) (g) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 27, 1990. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. Recommendation to receive and file Agenda Items. Recommendation to receive and file Monthly Investment Report Tentative Future the November, 1990 Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #46903 for an 11 -Unit Condo at 603 First Street. Memo- randum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 3, 1990. Recommendation to modify the conditions in the CUP for Robert's Liquor located at 74 Pier Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 28, 1990. Recommendation to review Final Housing Element document. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 3, 1990. (h) Recommendation to approve lease agreement with Project Touch for Room 'ICI'. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 3, 1990. (i) Recommendation to accept and file report re. Christmas Tree recycling plan. Memorandum from Building & Safety Director William Grove dated December 3, 1990. (j) Recommendation to receive and file Community Center lease policy. Memorandum from Community Resources Direc- tor Mary Rooney dated December 4, 1990. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. ORDINANCE NO. 90-1052- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMEMDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE HER- MOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO A PROVISION - REGULATING THE PARKING OF TRAILERS, SEMITRAILERS, CAMPER TRAILERS, AND RECREATIONAL TRAILERS. For adoption. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. Letter from Roger Bacon re. traffic problems at Park Pacific Shopping Center. (Staff Action: Referred to Traffic Committee) 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPEAL AT 588 TWENTIETH STREET. Memorandum from Planning' Director Michael Schubach dated December 4, 1990. 6. RECONSIDERATION OF PARAMEDIC FEES. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 3, 1990. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. SANITARY SEWERS REHABILITATION TARGET AREA 4, CIP 88- 406. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony An- tich dated December 5, 1990. (a) Award of Sanitary Sewer Construction Contract (b) Award of Sanitary Sewer Inspection Contract 8. CITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 89-90. Memo- randum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated Decem- ber 5, 1990. (a) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (including report of independent auditor). (b) Letter to management from auditors. 9. STRAND SAFETY MEASURES - ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW STRAND COMMITTEE. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated December 4, 1990. 10. GENERAL SERVICES' PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM AND CITY- WIDE PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM. Memo- randum from General Services Director Cynthia Wilson dated December 5, 1990. 11. RECOMMENDATION FOR TRIAL PROGRAM FOR ELECTRONIC HAND HELD CITATION WRITERS. Memorandum from General Services Director Cynthia Wilson dated December 5, 1990. 12. RECOMMENDATION FOR A TASK FORCE FOR DEVELOPING CONSENSUS FOR A HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (NEW POLICIES OF DEVELOPMENT). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 28, 1990. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the. Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT. Adjournment in memory of Edward Edwards former council member and Mayor from 1954 to 1956. Note: The December 11 meeting is the only scheduled regular City Council meeting in December. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Membersof he City Council l.nv FROM: Michael Schubach, Planni/r g/ Tfrector SUBJECT.: Missing Resolution DATE: December 5, 1990 In the process of examining adult uses, it was discovered that the department did not have a signed copy of the resolution for the adult video store at 1312 Hermosa Avenue. The City Clerkalso was unable to find a signed copy, although they had logged the resolution. According to the City Attorney, a copy can be signed by the current mayor. A copy for signature has been attached. Also the minutes of the City Council meeting when the resolution was adopted has been attached. All the modifications denoted in the minutes are included in the' resolution. p/memoa 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89 - 5232 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS, ADULT VIDEOS INCLUDED, AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1312 HERMOSA AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 8 AND 9, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT. WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on January 24 and February 14, 1989 to receive oral and written testimony on this matter and made the following findings: A. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding neighborhood and is consistent with the General Plan; B. Adult Video sales and rentals may be permitted in a C-2 zone when the adult use is an accessory use to general video sales and rentals and not the "predominant" use. C. The imposition of conditions of approval will mitigate any significant problems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit and an Environmental Negative Declaration to allow video sales and rentals, adult video sales and rental included, at 1312 Hermosa Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents and/or commercial establishments nearby. 2. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness,- and boisterous activities of patrons outside the business or in the immediate area. 3. The business shall validate its customer's parking. 4. The adult video selection shall ,be limited to 20% of the total videos available for rental and sale, and all other forms of adult paraphernalia, novelties, etc. shall be prohibited. 5. The interior layout shall be as shown on submitted plans and any changes to the interior shall be subject to review and 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 • 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 approval by the Planning Director; plans shall be submitted indicating the following modification within 30 days of the City. Council approval and subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. a. The area designated for adult videos shall be partitioned off and accessible only to adults, and an "adult only" sign shall be conspicuously located at the entrance to the designated adult area. b. Store shall be managed in manner that anything illegal for a minor to view shall not be displayed. 6. Any violation of the conditions of approval and/or violation of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be grounds for the issuance of a citation or public hearing for revocation of the conditional use permit. 7. Sign copy, including window signs, shall be limited to advertising the business in general and not specifically X-rated tapes; display of X-rated tapes shall be prohibited except in designated areas. Said designated area must be. distinctly separated from the display area of the general videos. a. All sign copy shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director for compliance. b. No window display of adult, X-rated, materials or corollary materials. 8. A manager or clerk who is aware of 'conditions. of the conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. a. Each manager shall be given a copy of the conditional use permit and shall acknowledge by signature that the conditional use permit has been read and understood. b. All employees shall be a minimum of eighteen (18) years old. c. No home delivery of videos. 9. Prior to a conditional use permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 10. The Planning Commission may review the conditional use permit and may amend the conditions or impose new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the. neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 11. There shall be a staff review and report to The Planning Commission and City Council every six months. 4 5 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Continued Resolution No. 90-5232 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 1989. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK p/ccrs1312 CITY ATTORNEY Motion Sheldon, second Williams. AYES ----Creighton, Sheldon, Simpson, William ayor Rosen-bex•er NOES - None It was noted that t - y anni • ommission will be hold- ing Public Hea gs on the Non-Confor ity Ordinance in the near ure, where this particular p em could be ad• - sed. 6. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO EXCLUDE ADULT VIDEOS FROM A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS AT 1312 HERMOSA AVENUE; HERMOSA VIDEO. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 17, 1989. (Continued from 1/24/89 meeting..) 14 supplemental letters in opposition to granting of appeal. A staff report was presented by Director Schubach. The Public Hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak were: Appellant Scott Gallagher - submitted a petition with 200 additional signatures in support of the appeal Mark Hoffman 437 -2nd Street in favor of appeal Gerald Packra - 730 Camino Real R.B. - in favor Speaking in opposition to the appeal were: Victor Smith - attorney from Rutherford Institute - submitted memorandum dated February 14, 1989. Wilma Burt - 1152 -7th Street Tom Allen - 1602 The Strand Kary Reed - 1821 Pacific Coast Highway Dave Fordice - attorney,from Culver City Michael Mitchell - 3rd Street Also speaking was Howard Longacre who requested..no delivery of videos. The Public Hearing was closed. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 89-5232, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS, ADULT VIDEOS INCLUDED, AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1312 HERMO- SA AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 8 AND 9, BLOCK 34, FIRST ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT.", with the fol- lowing changes/additions: 1. Change No. 11 that there shall be a staff review and report to the Planning Commission and City Council every six months. 2. Add condition: No window displays of adult videosor correlary materials. Minutes 2-14-89 3. Add condition: No other adult types of materials for sale, meaning no novelty items. 4. Add condition: Store shall be managed in manner that anything illegal for a minor to view shall not be displayed. 5. Add condition: No home delivery of videos. Motion Rosenberger, second Sheldon. AYES - Creighton, Sheldon, Mayor Rosenberger NOES Simpson, Williams Further Action: To adopt a Resolution of Intention No. 89-5233 to send to the Planning Commission to study removing all video sales from C-1 and C-2 and to study as part of this amortizing any businesses of a noncon- forming nature. Motion Sheldon, second Simpson. So ordered. Final Action: To bring back an Emergency Moratorium next meeting to preclude until the study of the Planning Commission is finished the sale of videos of any kind in any store in the C-1 or C-2 zones. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. CONDITIONAL ZONE CHANGE FROM M-1 AND OPEN SPACE TO R4 WITH MAXIMUM OF 13 -UNIT CONDO OR TO SUCH OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 603,FIRST STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Njchael Schu ach dated February 6, 1989. A staff eport was presented by Director Schubach. i' The Public nearing was opened. Coming forward to speak. were: Pat Killin - Proje t Architect 312 S. Catalina Polly Schneider - 15 Ardmore - opposed Warner Lombardi - 1849 alley Park - questions, men tioned problems with othe recent subdivision. Karey Holby - 719 -1st Place- opposed Jan McHugh - 718 -1st Place posed John McHugh - 7 8. -1st Place - o�posed Action: To deny zone change and sen. to Planning Com- mission tom"study changing the General an designation to low density at the next quarterly Gen= al Plan Review: Motion Williams, second Creighton. AYES - Creighton, Simpson, Williams .NOES - Sheldon, Mayor Rosenberger - 10 - • Minutes 2=14-89 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, November 27, 1990, at the hour of 7:34 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Robert Blackwood, Director of Personnel ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon Absent: None COMMENDATION TO DEPARTING PLANNING COMMISSIONER SCOTT INGELL Mayor Sheldon expressed the City's gratitude and presented Scott Ingell with a plaque of appreciation. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Sheldon announced that the City "Tree Lighting" ceremony would take place Tuesday, December 4, 1990, at 5:30 P.M. near Loreto Plaza in downtown Hermosa Beach, and would feature the Hermosa Beach Valley School band and choir. Mayor Sheldon announced the start of the new public participation item on the agenda that allowed public com- ments of up to one minute on any item, on or off of the agenda, with the exception of items scheduled for a public hearing later in the agenda and explained that the Council could not legally hear comments or, testimony on public hearing items other than at the advertised time PUBLIC COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Jim Lissner — 2715 El Oeste Drive, concerned about Real Estate signs on City property, considered them unsightly, questioned if an Ordinance could be passed requiring their removal after a property had been sold. Mayor Sheldon said the signs were illegal and directed staff to enforce the existing code. Wesley Bush - Hermosa Beach Chamber -of Commerce, submitted a petition from local businesses and asked the Council for direction. Mayor Sheldon referred the matter to staff and the Board of Vehicle Parking Commissioners to respond to the request. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (i) with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (a) Midstokke, and (f) Midstokke and Wiemans Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 13, 1990. City Council Minutes 11-27-90 Page 7337 (b) This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the Minutes of the Hermosa Beach City Council Meeting of November 13, 1990, as amended by Councilmember Midstokke to read in item 1(m) that her reason for pulling this item was the Chamber's outstand- ing bill from the "Fiesta"; and in item 1(n) that all of her concerns should be listed: 1) high accident rate, 2) ridership .down, 3) long response time, 4) cost vs. revenue, and 5) employee problems. There being no objections, this action was so ordered by Mayor Sheldon. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 35105 and Nos. 35267 through 35390 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 35272, 35273, 35319, and 35328. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file .the October, 1990 Financial Reports: 1) Revenue and Expense Report 2) City Treasurer's Report (e) Recommendation to approve the concept for expansion of Edith Rodaway Friendship Park. Memorandum from Communi- ty Resources Director Mary Rooney dated November 14,. 1990. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the concept of developing the new parcels at Edith Rodaway Friendship Park as a passive picnic area with landscaping, grass and modular picnic facilities and to direct staff to return with cost estimates for the proj- ect at the midyear budget review. (f) Recommendation to approve report regarding downtown sidewalk cleaning and scrubbing after the 1 year evalua- tion. Memorandum from Public Work Director Anthony Antich dated November 15, 1990. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun cilmembers Midstokke and Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Authorize staff to purchase a steam cleaner for approximately $2800 from prospective expenditures; 2) Scrub the sidewalks every other week during the summer months and once a month during the winter months; City Council Minutes 11-27-90 Page 7338 (g) (h) (i) 3) Continue the current policy of requiring the Chamber of Commerce to steam clean (not scrub) after each Fiesta; 4) Continue the current policy of using Public Works staff to steam clean the area twice a year in addition to the cleaning by the Cham- ber; and 4) Continue;, the policy, of deferring the decision on downtown sidewalk scrubbing to the Vehicle Parking District. And, to direct staff to advise and work with the Chamber of Commerce to ensure that the steam cleaning of the sidewalks is done properly; also for staff to report back with a follow-up in thirty (30) days. Motion Creighton, second Essertier.So ordered. Recommendation to approve an amendment to the Indepen- dent Cities Risk Management Authority joint powers agreement to provide for the admittance to membership of the cities of Costa Mesa, El Segundo, & Upland and designating City representatives. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated November 19., 1990,.with Resolution for adoption. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au- thorize the Mayor to execute the attached resolution No. 90-5424, entitled, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADMITTANCE TO MEMBERSHIP OF THE CITIES OF COSTA MESA, EL SEGUNDO, AND UPLAND AND DESIGNATING CITY REPRESENTATIVES."; amending the definition of "member city"; and amending the pro- cedure for payment of demands against the authority. Recommendation to accept Environmental Assessment report on 2 surplus school sites and to appropriate purchase funds. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin Northcraft dated November 19, 1990. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Accept the Phase I Environmental Assessment from Targhee, Inc., including the supplemental report, as complete; 2) Determine that the conditions of the property are acceptable to complete the purchase from the Hermosa Beach City School District; and 3) Appropriate previously designated Park and Recreation Tax Funds in the amount of $253,000 for this purchase. Recommendation to authorize the sale of Federal Aid .Ur- ban (FAU) funds. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated November 20, 1990. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Authorize the sale of existing City Federal Aid City Council Minutes 11-27-90 Page 7339 Urban (FAU) funds in the amount of $197,900 to the Alameda County Transportation Authority for $158,320; 2) Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement with Alameda County Transportation Authority; and 3) Approve the deposit of these funds in the State Gas Tax Fund, Fund exchange account. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1050, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ARTICLE XIII OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE RELATED TO FEES AND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE/COST COMPARISON SYSTEM AND AMENDING VARIOUS OTHER SECTIONS OF THE CODE INCONSISTENT THERE- WITH." For adoption. And, to set a public hearing for the regular meeting of December 11, 1990, for recon- sideration of the user fees for Paramedic service, both transport and non -transport. Also, to immediately implement all fee reductions in all departments. Motion Mayor Sheldon, second Wiemans. So ordered, noting the objections of Creighton and Midstokke. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 90-1051, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, SECTION 13-7(C) (3) REGARDING EXTENSIONS OF WALLS WITH NONCONFORMING SIDE YARDS TO GIVE THE PLANNING COM- MISSION MORE DISCRETION TO APPROVE REQUESTS FOR SUCH EXCEPTIONS AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION." For adoption. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items (a) and (f) were discussed at this time. but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (a) Letter from R.J. Kenny dated October 22, 1990, regarding Strand bikepath safety improvements. (Staff action: Referred to Public Works, citizen input acknowledged by. letter dated November 7, 1990). Mayor Sheldon acknowledged the letter, thanked Mr. Kenny. for his efforts, and noted that this information would be included in the material for the item on Strand bike- way safety scheduled for the regular meeting of December 11, 1990 (b) Letter from Parker Herriott dated November 20, 1990, regarding the Greenwood 172 Room Hotel on the Strand. A complete copy of the 62 pages of attachments submitted City Council Minutes 11-27-90 Page 7340 with the letter are available for viewing in the City Clerk's office. (Staff action: Referred to the Building Department for response.) Mayor Sheldon acknowledged the letter and directed staff to respond to this letter and the subsequent letters of November 26 and 27, 1990 by providing a chronology and results of the original staff conditions. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None Note: (The advertised hearing on a variance at 40 Seventh Court was postponed at the request of appellant.) MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE, AND FILE REVIEW OF 4 - 10 SCHEDULE. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated September 18, 1990. Personnel Director Blackwood presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file, and to direct staff to negotiate the 4 day 10 hour a day work schedule at the next Employee Contract Negotiations. Motion Midstokke, second Mayor Sheldon. So ordered, noting the objections of Essertier and Wiemans. The meeting recessed at 8:44 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:52 P.M. 6. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE MANIACI INSURANCE SERVICES, INC, AS CITY'S HEALTH INSURANCE BROKER. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated November 21, 1990. Continued from 11/13/90 Councilmember Wiemans declared a potential conflict of interest due to his spouse having retained Mr. Maniaci's services, and, left the dais and the room. Councilmember Essertier presented the report from the Council sub -committee. Director Blackwood responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To continue with Maniaci for the pres- ent time without a contract, but, prior to next year's open enrollment period, the City staff should solicit the insurance brokers, go through the normal bid pro- cedure with the sealed bids coming to the City Clerk's office, and allow sufficient time for City Council and staff review. Motion Mayor Sheldon, second Creighton. The motion failed due to the objections of Creighton and Essertier. City Council Minutes 11-27-90 Page 7341 Proposed Action: To have Western Group Agencies, Inc. work with Director Blackwood to come up with a set of providers and policies, consistent with the requirements negotiated with the bargaining groups, to provide health insurance coverage that meets the contractual obliga- tions of the City to the employees. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. Motion withdrawn. The City Attorney stated that there were matters that should be discussed in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) concerning Potential Litigation. • The regular meeting adjourned to a closed session at 10:01 P.M. The regular meeting reconvened at 10:12 P.M. Action: To receive and file the staff report Motion Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. Councilmember Wiemans returned to the dais. 7. RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PEDESTRIANS CROSSING GREENBELT INTERSECTIONS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated November 20, 1990. Public Works Director Antich responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission (PRCRAC) recommendation to: 1) Alter the landscaping and move the Greenbelt path westerly at 8th Street, on a trial basis, thereby allowing. joggers/pedestrians to cross at a corner; and. 2) Have staff report back to the PRCRAC one month after the implementation. To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Pursue a T.V. media campaign to provide educa- tion awareness (via "Beach Beat". etc.) of where to cross on the Greenbelt; and 2) Authorize staff to pursue utilizing the Cal- ifornia Conservation Corps for this trial project. Motion'Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered. 8. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE APPLICATION OF CALIFORNIA CON- SERVATION CORPS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated November 13, 1990. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) Authorize staff to prepare application for ser- vice (Project Evaluation Forms) to utilize the California Conservation Corps (CCC) for the projects noted, to include: a) remove old and install new play equipment at Valley Park; landscape City parking City Council Minutes 11-27-90 Page 7342 lots; landscape, path diversion and redo steps on Greenbelt; landscape and park construction at Edith Rodaway Park; re -roof Prospect school house; repair and paint building at Bicentennial Park; and, land- scape and renovate 19th and Prospect Park; b) as well as other future projects; and Appropriate $,6,00;0, from the Park and Recre- ation Facility Tax Fund balance to Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 89-506 so that some of the work can be done utilizing the CCC. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. 9. RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT STAFF TO REQUEST DESIGN FUNDS FROM COASTAL CONSERVANCY FOR MUNICIPAL PIER RENOVATION. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated November 14, 1990. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to prepare a formal request for design funds from the Coastal Conservancy for the potential Pier Renovation project. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. 10. RECOMMENDATION TO .INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A PROVISION REGULATING THE PARKING OF TRAILERS, SEMI -TRAILERS, CAMPER TRAILERS, AND RECREATIONAL TRAILERS. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated November 7, 1990, with ordinance for introduction. Public Safety Director Wisniewski presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter was: Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, asked if all available methods could be used to limit or preclude oversized vehicles from parking on City streets. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 90-1052, and to di- rect staff to research and consider if a special permit could be required for an oversized vehicle that used more than one parking space in the yellow zone. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. Final Action: To waive full reading of Ordinance No. 90-1052, entitled, 'IAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO A PROVISION REG- ULATING THE PARKING OF TRAILERS, SEMI -TRAILERS, CAMPER TRAILERS, AND RECREATIONAL TRAILERS." Motion Creighton, second Essertier. City Council Minutes 11-27-90 Page 7343 AYES: Creighton, Essertier, Wiemans, Midstokke, Mayor Sheldon NOES: None 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Northcraft reported on The Holiday Tree Lighting ceremony to take place on Tuesday, December 4, 1990, at 5:50 P.M. near Loreto Plaza, and solicited any comments or suggestions to improve or clarify the "orange" sheet that covers the agenda. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL Mayor Sheldon announced that a representative was needed to replace former Mayor Creighton on the "Beach Cities Coalition for Alcohol and Drug -Free Youth, Inc.". Coun- cilmember Essertier accepted the appointment. 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL - None CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council was: Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, requested a public hearing on the Strand hotel and submitted the letter referred to under item 4(b). Councilmember Wiemans requested a ruling from the City Attorney regarding his potential for a conflict of interest as stated in item 6. The City Attorney determined that there was no financial gain to Councilmember Wiemans, therefore no conflict. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of theCity of. Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, November 27, 1990, at the hour of 10:28 P.M., to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tues- day, December 11, 1990, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. NOTICE: The City Council's only scheduled regular meeting in December, 1990, will be held on Tuesday, December 11, 1990 at 7:30 P.M: 0,0"Yit Vai_662,S- Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 11-27-90 Page 7344 76, FINANCE-SFA340 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE - S 6 0001 -'-- --- --' -- , aJ.♦ ate. aa, 7v //MG LC1U07 -7U 2 3 FAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # _ -- *DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENG DATE SXP "- - - 14-" TH0MAS'=BOHCIN 00894 001-400-2101-4312 01574 $231. 50 01202 35344 MEALS/HOTEL/P.O.S.T CRSE 11/29/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST $0.00 12/05/90 1O 12 -TOTAL ?:' =* VENDOR =#s****#*********#*****#***ai-*#�tt***x# *##**#?t#?+**#*#:r#x#***#*#******?s•at $231.50 M • 14 15 • 16 --------" Fr-"---CAC-POLY KELLOG NI i FU0ND. 000/J 001-400=2101-4312-61578 $293.72 01204 35392 17 i TUITION/A. ALTFELD 11/29/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST $0.00 12/05/90 IQ - to ..__ 20 'TOTAL- *441' VENDOR ?r#4F###4#****#*#****a"*###****##*#**********?t****#*arm#.u********#*****;t $293.72 21 E7 14 _ `------TN—CRIMINAL JUSTICE -INSTITUTE 00864 001-400-2101-4312 01577 $157.00 01203 35391 25 TUITION/T. BOHLIN 11/29/90 POLICE /TRAVEL_ EXPENSE . POST $0.00 12/05/90 7' 7 . 26 #Y# VENDOR TOTAL *-xi**#***:T**#: **#**:T#***#x**#*#? #*#* •* •* -*#*#?t•tt-*#*#***#?t# t#x*##*#*** - $157.00 i. --'H---0ATES"MC DONALD 02596 705-400-1217-4182 00157' $10,304.00 01305 35396 STIPULATED AWARD/AGENT 12/04/90 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR $0.00 12/06/90 'j F* VENDOR.. TOTAL #**##########*##################*##### ##########################*## $10,304.00 • 1 / —14-----S G I tOMWANDLRPDUL 03771 001-400-2101-4316 00630 $51.00 01201 3539? A' LUNCH MEETING/POLICE 11/29/90 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 .12/05/90 4_ 44 '-#= VENDOR TOTAL =*: #*#=#z*s*Y*Y*x***s#***#*#: **#r**#: #*#: ******•u*•ir*#=#*****#*#*#**** $51.00 <6 46 47 46 -TOTAL -• #=# NAY LODE ########**§ * t*#=*************** ***#********* r*4*****4* ******#?r# $11.037.22 49 5, ' - 1: . 77---R-----ALPHA-BETA 03176 . 001-210-0000-2110 04000 ' $250.00 00221 11050 35413 r TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 00221 11/26/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/05/90 54 55 ### VE. NUM -TOTAL *****#############################•*#*-###*#################*-###*•****# $250. 00 ' . D7 - 56 59 ,'y 60 -------R ---- AMER I C AN PCANNINa nSSUCIATTON 03762 001-400-4101-4316 00194 $149.78 260844 10573 35414 61 '7- PUBLICATIONS/PLANNING 60844 .11/07/90 PLANNING /TRAINING $0.00 12/03/90 as 64 *4* VLN OR TOTAL ##*##############**#########***********############*****######*** $149.78 65 56 -C 67 " 1 r 59 Pi AMERICAN SOC OF CIVIL ENG. 02317 001-400-4202-4315 00062 $205.00 01415 35415 09 7.; DUES/A: ANTICH. 11/26/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 12/05/90 777 74 75 1b79. l . - J 0 J J J J J a 0 1 FINANCE—SFA340 11' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND. LIST PAGE 0002 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER , TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO i# CHK # 4, 5 6 7 e ' •-. DESCRIPTION . DATE—INVC— PROS 4 ACCOUNT ESCT TFTIDN AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP j..- . _.._414# `VENDOR "TOTAL •*#'* *#4***## -#= **# #: f•tt-###-m#•*-x'*at*##•i£-1t#4**#ai•*- •tri•#?r•n•4444**•?t3r•tt•*at#*4 $205.00 9 10 11 12 R-- _-.-..HAROLD*ANSCHEL 03344 00T72-1-0-0000-2110 04006 $150.00 95533 01508 35416 i WORK GUARANTEE REFUND - 95533 11/29/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE$0.04 12/05/90 '3F*******3141#•!t###- 13 14 16 _--_.#4# 7ENDOR- TOTAL— #it--W*#4•;44#4 ?f -b••zt•ttat•u3t•tt'?t#?t•ir-?t•n?t•u'?t•x-31-#?1-at•z••tt•x•ztxarat-a ***;!-** $150.00 - • •I i7 10 19 20 `•'— "R` • "-- —ANTHONY•" 4ANTICH 00030 051-400-4202-4316 00165 $42.18 01427 35417 MONTHLY EXP/NOV 90 11/30/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 12/05/90 71 22 23 24 — 4W VENDOWTO1AL 4-#-4-##mai'# -##**-tt•#**#?r#*•tt•*•z••n*• •u'•z•*it•xi••tt•**-'*#*#*#at• ?rtt'*-tr#•tt'?r**•a'*stn- •-x•*#****•b••n•# $42.16 25 26 27 78 'R ASSOC FOR-RETARDED—CITIZENS 026109 001-210--0000-2110 04005 $500.00 09439 01509 35418 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 09439 11/29/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/05/90 30 32 - _. ## VENDOR --TOTAL • # #'WW#'-**#####*-z'##*#•tt-4-##•z'###*#•u x•'x'###*ar*# -*#*•n•#•x'#ar# --tt-***#at**#•n-****# $500.00 s1 _4 35 --•---•----R.-_----ANNA413AKER 03770 001.-210-0000-2110 04007 $100.00 09451 01512 35419 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 09451 11/29/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/05/90 - �, 42 I **- VENDOk l uTAL ##44# t* *********************************#•******************** ***** $100.0044 --'----"'---'R-------PALTE BARB 00952 00172-0=0000-2110 04003 $50.00 10118 0151-1 35420 ' ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 10118 11/29/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/05/90 45 447 ,A 40 50 51 52 *#-* VENDOR =TAE ?R'4#: -• #***5*# '#Y#: * **31 -##*#*#*•1-*##******#*********#.$--**###***#**#*## $50700 tt 53 3s rA k EVEEYN4BERNE 03768 110-300-0000-3302 37375 518.00 932456 01111 35421 CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 32458 11/29/90 - /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00- 12/05/90 ..-WW—VENDOk I UTAi--��# �f WW# 44#31##44*************************************************** $18. 00 IIS 1 57 50 60 G., H 5CIC1MAN: INC. 03092 001-400-4601-4201 00670 $196.00 00763 35422 THEATRE TECH/NOV 16-17 11/19/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT$0.00 12/05/90 61 e2, 64 ,. L 4#4FM###########*#4•###•*•####*#4•#4#****4##•u•4-###****################ $196.00 _ - - ' 51 . - 05 66 671 60 60 77 n' 72 k i'CUE SHIEED—O}- CALIFORNIA 01308 001-400-1212-4188 01923 $88.54 00055 35423 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 • • 56 57 74 75 FINANCE-SFA340 11------TIME-1271/70 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST OR 12/11/90 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT BLUE-SHIEED OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 R BLUE SHIELD -OF -CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 --------R---BLUE SHIELD -OF CALIFORNIA t CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 R7-- '..-BLUE SHIELD -OF -CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 DATE INVC PROJ 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0003 DATE 12/06/90 INV/REF PO 4 CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 01308 109-400-3301-4188 00059 $2.77 11/19/90 YEN PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01305 110-400-3302-4188 01263 11/19/90. PARKING ENF 01308 145-400-3401-4188 01014 11/19/90 DIAL A RIDE 0330$ 14.5-400-3402-4188 11/19/90 ESEA R BEDE-SHIELD OF CAL11-URNIA 0/308 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 ........ 7-R -- BLUE -SHIELD' OF CAL1FORRIA 01308 $4. 16 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.69 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00055 35423 $0. 00 12/05/90 00055 35423 $0. 00 12/05/90 00055 35423 $0. 00 12/05/90 01018 $0.28 155-400-2102-4188 00583 CROSSING GUARD CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90• /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00055 35423 $0. 00 12/05/90 $0. 69 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS z 160-400-3102-4188 00991 SEWER/ST DRAIN $1. 07 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS * VENDOR-TOTAC-x**#**##:#*#**********#***#*#*#*****************#*#*#***#*#*#*##*** _...�_.__ R__.___. -.BLUE SHIELD-PREFERRED-- CITY SHIELD...-PREFERRED-CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 EUE--SHTELU PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 ---- BLUE SHIELD- PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 D1-093 BLUE -SHIELD -PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 -7-R-7-BLUE-SHIELD-PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 $96.20 00055 35423 $0. 00 .12/05/90 I� 2 3 4 3 6 7 e 9 10 II 2 3 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 41 22 23 24 25 28 27 - I. 00055 35423 $0.00 12/05/90 3, 32 33 3 11/19/90 001-400-1212-4188 01924 EMP BENEFITS $11,943.98 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01293 110-400-3302-4188 01264 $916.66 .11/19/90 R 012773 11/19/90 00056 35424 $0. 00 - 12/05/90 36 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 145-400-3403-4188 00329 $13.18 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01293 170-400-2103-4188 00047 $221.55 11/19/90 00056 35420E- $0.00 12/05/90 00056 35424 $0. 00 12/05/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01293 705-400-1217-4188 00364 1- . $118.37 00056 35424 $0.00 12/05/90 11/19/90 WORKERS COMP' /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS __vENDnR-TOTAE-'4'--#1a4..b.?i...#..p...#...rnitit'irar ..#.y.*..u'* it**#.*.?i **arae'ai*'it.:i..b.**.,i.;f.q... *.#.* ** *.b.*..:rai-,,'*a{'ar*' ?s'3r** `---.R ------ SANDRA#BRANDT • CITE PAYMENT REFUND 00831 00056 35424 $0. 00 12/05/90 $13,213.74 03753 110-300-0000-3302 37376 $18.00 11/27/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING * VhNIJOR'TOTAL############iF#s}#######****3t###iF#iF#########?F#####3F##****############sF 900831 01152 35425 $0. 00 12/05/90 $18. 00 H GARY*BRUTSCR, CITY -TREASURER 62016 001-400-1101-4319 00095 $23.27 -REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90 CITY'COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS 01513 35426 $0. 00 12/05/90 77 41 43 14 43 16 47 40 40 52 53 56 56 47 56 50 60 61 82 N 64 66 67 60 60 73 71 72 73 74 75 7q' .40 S S FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0004 L.. --"' "-""TIME 1. 11. U3 FUR 12/11/H0 1JA1 E-12-/06/90 IN 2 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 4 :._. ..-......_ ._. - ---"DESCRIPTION UA I E 1NVC PROOF' #I — 7iCCDUt I-DESCRTPTIU1d AMOURT-UNENC DATE EXP 5 6 7 9 ------- _.R ..----_GARY*•BRUTSCH7- CTTY'TRtmbUKEK 02016 U0I-400-1202-305 00352 41.30 01513 35426 9 REIMB'PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 40.00 12/05/90 10 12 -GARY*BRUTSCH, R -' CITY TREASURER- 02016 U01-400=2101=430-5 013927- .422.81 01513' 35426 13 REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 40.00 12x'05/901n ' 15 1 - i - 16 - `-R-GARYYBRUTSCF7-r/TY 1HEASURER- 02016 001-400-2103=4309 00361 44.61 01513 35426 17 i REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 12/05/90 10 20 -TREASURER R""': "- GARY''*BRUTSCH, "CITY 02016 0711=400-2TM-4310 00285 414.00 01513 35426 21 REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90 POLICE • • /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 40.00 12/05/90 22 24 R--GARY#BRUTSCH:-CITY-TRtASUHEN 02016 001-400-2101-4316 00632 443.50' 01513 35426 25 REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90 POLICE /TRAINING 40.00 12/05/90 26 n 78 _-...._.. R._._,_..._.GARY*BRUTSCH; TTY- TREASUREW 020f6 001-400=4204-4309 01825 415.16 01513 35426 29 REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90 '. BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 12/05/90 3, 32 N. 6ARV;MRUTSC-, •- - • 016 001-400-4601-4308 00471' 432.42 01513 35426 33 REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 40.00 12/05/90 34 75 F GARY*BRUTSCH; -CITY-TREASURER 02016 0.01-400=4'601=4316 00153 425.00 01513 35426 37 REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90. . COMM RESOURCES /TRAINING 40.00. 12/05/90 3t' 39 • 40 R RY *BRUTSCH-CITY-TREATS[)' ' • • _ • - '00 _ • - 09 00675 419.77 01513 354213 41 REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90 STREET LIGHTING/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 40.00 12/05/90 d2 44 - -----R'----'GARY4BRUTSCH, L ITY-TREASURER 02016 110-502430b 00738 .45. 00 01513 35426 4* REIMB PETTY CASH/NOV 30 12/03/90 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 40.00 12/05/90 46 47 48 4** VtNDOK t U f AL **********4 ib* **** *******3 *************************************** 4206.84 45 - - 50 51 ' 52 ;, Sr-00NSULTANTSr IFTC. 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00455 4656. 50 2741 00626 35427 53 PLAN CK/3133 THE STRAND 2741• 11/02/90 BUILDING_ /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 4656.50 12/05/90 S54 s $bl CONSULTANTS, IgC. • • -. s • • -400 ' 0 -4201 00456 4198.64 2741 00627 35427 D7 PLAN"CK/1068 BAYVIEW DR 2741 11/02/90 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT. 4198.64 12/05/90 : 59 60 1.- R BSI-C08SULTANTS71! . 00630 001-440-4201-4201 00457 413,280.28 2741 00641 35427 61 PLAN CK/1302-40 STRAND 2741 11/02/90 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 413,280.54 12/05/90 62 H 8SY CONSUETANTS; INC.00630 001-400-4261-4201 00450- 41,950.00 2741 00648 35427 L5 ,_ PLAN CK/1302 THE STRAND. 2741 11/02/90 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 41,950.00 12/05/90 66.0 69 70 71 .14 72 73 74 .25 75 4 0 0 w Y F I N:;NCE—SFA340 12: ff:Z53 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0005 "MG. aG7 \Jo/ 7V . 2 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN l AMOUNT INV/REF PO it CHK t - .....--DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD ii 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 6 6 " j tz BST-CONSULTANT8—LNC. 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00459 $692.90 2741 00647 35427 0 ! PLAN CK/656 LONGFELLOW 2741 11/02/90 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $692.90 12/05/90 ,, -- — -- • 12 —INC. -Z5 R I:SI' CONSULTANTS; 00E30 13 -001=-400=4201-4201-004b0 $1,085.50 2741 00607 35427'3 PLAN CK/1010 17TH ST 2741 11/02/90 BUILDING ' /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT . $1.082.36 12/05/90 1S 16 **If -VENDOR- t U 1 AL #4 *##*#*## tt-*#*#######*#tt*###*#*#####********* **** #-it-*-x-****-n ** *** $17.863.82 17 - .. 16 19 __' .. ... .. 20 - R " BUCKNER -03727-06T-400-6101=4309 009821 $207.23 33188 01088 35428 21 VALVE/VALLEY PARK 33188 11/19/90 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $210.46 12/05/90 22 24 • 'VET 1DOR 1 U 1 AL •* ****************************** *4*************************** *** $207.23 25 26 _ 27 28 ._''" 'CA'SPECIALIZED R TRAINING INET.- 63769-----0001-400-2101-4312 01581 $125.00 01210 35429 2A TUITION/D. COOK 11/29/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 12/05/90 31 . —4F4 ,: VENDOR"TOTAL ? ** ###*#***#*#tt-#*#*#*#*#+**###it###*###*****#*#it#*#?r#?r**#?t###:>F#: *#* $125.00 3- � R GENEE7—L.4CADDEN 03754 001-400-4102-4201 00281 $280.50 10883 35430 37 SEC SERV/9-18-90 11/27/90 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12:'05/90 3y 40 at**************** t*********************at?t******stat******* ****#at#3Eet?t# $280.50 41 42 43 - - dA -1 - ---"'"-CALIFORNIA -F1 RKING-DEVICE 00262 001-400-1101-4305 00343 $58.71 29712 09347 35431 45 NAMEPLATES/STAMP 29712 -08/23/90 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $58.71 12/05/90 44; 48 # AL 4••?t*##?t#*af**at#at#at#**#at*#at**#atat**at.tat#•;****#*it*at***at#iE#afar*#at#*#*#-*##*# $58. 71 49 50 51 —'"-----52 -CALIFORNIA"-WATER 7 SERVICE 00016 001-400-2101-4303 00019 f . $24.36 01110 35432 5' WATER BILLINGS/NOV 90. 11/30/90 POLICE /UTILITIES $0.00 12/05/90 54 58 R CALTFORNT WATER -SERVICE 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00119 $558.36 01110' 35432 S7 4. WATER-BILLINGS/NOV-90 11/30/90 MEDIANS /UTILITIES $0.00 12/05/90. 358 9 -__'""CALIFORNIA__ __ _ 90 _-.-----R----CALIFORNIA—WATER - R WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00421 $397.55 01110 35432 61 i.7 - WATER BILLINGS/NOV 90 • -11/30/90 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES $0.00 12105/90 a; 64 ,R CALIFORNIA—WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00328 $2.814.92 01110 35432 1i5 WATER BILLINGS/NOV 90 11/30/90 PARKS . /UTILITIES $0.00 12/05/90 56 a7 69 69 70 71 72 7) 7 FINANCE-SFA340 ," CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0006 --TIME -- TIME 12: 11:03 FOR12TCI79U —DATE 12746/90 1\ 2 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 4 ' DESCRIPTION UAIL INVC PROD'# ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTIDN AMOUNT UNEPC DATE EXP 5 6 7 __. --if** "VENDOR "TOTALL-#*** **#y*# # ##r4 " '&'##4f# #* 4w**--**?r'tt'****'tt'#at#*#*#*x'**** 83, 795. 19 9 10 • 12 "-" ".-- " . R " ". _"._ WM -CAMPBELL/SHERMAN-L4ILt ANS- 03760 T501=2i0-0000=2ITO 04501 8250.00 04531 11051 35433 13 TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 04531 11/26/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 80.00 12/05/90 14 15 '----7-*** VENDOR""TOTAIL-##?f #44 ##'&4N4*4-'I£# # 4:#:tl###- #*4 3r##*#t**** ****#at'u?t****#''*at'# 8250. 00 17 10 19 20 R''-"""'CCAN INNOVATION GROUP 03144- 001-400-1262-4316 00333 880.00 01108 35434 21 SEMINAR REG/V. COPELAND 11/30/90 FINANCE ADMIN 0 /TRAINING 80.00 12/05/90 z3 24 —.__—*** VENL+DR TOTAL -4'### x #3t"#*?#*as"**#*at"u'##**'n'#4##is'?t*#es'#*******'x";t'x"***'><'#*****'ir##*ar*z" 880. 00 t 25 26 _ 27 26 -""--' ""R""""'" —CHAMPION -CHEVROLET— UOOTA O;Si=400 2TOi-4311 0101-8 870.88 01112 35435 29 MISC. CHARGES/OCT 90 10/31/90 'POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 80.00 12/05/90 " . 1 3 -*#7' vtNDDR-TOT-AL ######********#******** *stat.s•*******#*#******************,'tae********** 870.88 3 1 1 35 36 F'HENRY'-CHANG 03579 061-234-000110 04002 8250.00 03206 11052 35436 37 TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 03206 11/26/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 80"00 12/05/90 3s ** L ######***** **************** **** ********************* ************ 8250.00 ** 41 42 43 '11 W CHEVR0N-1JSA7— EN . 00634 001-400-2101-4310 00284 8560.94 1417284419 01114 35437 45 i GAS CHARGES/NOV 90 84419 11/20/90 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 80.00 12/05/90 46 a7 k°' 40 *4 VENDOR -TO I AL Tf & F.W*****###########*'*'*************aa**************************** 8560.94 49 50 51 52 1 r,_ F DAVID-G:"COFFEY 03677 001-400-1132-4201 00064 84, 600.00 00996 35438 53 !,,, CITY PROSECUTOR/NOV 90 12/05/90 - CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 80.00 12/06/90 S4 5.I ns i , 41-.4 Vt>roOR- I u I AL- ' Y# .### '####*#*##*##*#* -# .*###*####**##*#####*****###*# '# 84, 600.00 57 50 t - 50 :. - - 60 R COM SYSTEMS: -INC 00017 001-400-215a=4304 00710 816.32 01117 35439 61 LONG DIST/POLICE/NOV 90 11/16/90. POLICE /TELEPHONE 80.00 12/05/90 62 63 *** VtNDON 1 U t AL , # ##'I #TfT '###IFM#######at'#*############### *########*####**##**##* 816. 32 65 66 67 Io51 6n Vt-- H .LOPYFAX COMMUNICATIONS 03"6.;3 001-400-1208-'4�O1 0708 8195, 00 7672 08038 35440. 69 1 FAX MACH MAINT/FY 90-91 7672 11/28/90 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 80.00 12/05/90 7O 72 FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0007 TIME 12:11:03 FiW 12/11/90 DATE 12/06/90 1i• PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER. TRN 4 AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK 4 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PRO,' 44 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R. 7 8 I : ----- # 4.- VENDOR` TOTAL 4 *#* *aFP#**aa#aa#**•x•**#****•3+•u•*#tt•tt•ar*-tt#*#-tt•***•n•#•u•az••tt•tt••n•#*x••tt•**•a•****•tt#* •** *195. 00 s 10 I1 • . 12 R ' .._-- C08TCO, -- INC. • M761 110-400-33.02-4305 00740 $180.30 00298 35441 13 - CHAIR MATS/BASE 3 11/29/90 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *0.00 12/05/90 1d '7 - R C05TC I --INC: 03761 110-400-330'2=5401 00049 *341.56 00298 35441 OFFICE CHAIRS/BASE 3 11/29/90 PARKING ENF /EQUIP -LESS THAN *500 *0.00 12/05/90 1D - --***:-VENDOR TOTAL ****************** '************************* *********************** $521.86 21 - 22 23 24 R CSFMO ANNUAL SEMINAR 02629 001-400-1202-4317 00069 5180.00 TR318 00318 35442 25 CONF. REG/V. COPELAND TR318 11/29/90 FINANCE ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *0.00 12/05/90 26 27 29 -'7.—'- .._-- ,# VENDOR TOTAL ?t-#• •**- *# •**#"x-•tt•*#*#* # '*#*#**at-*at•*•tt-*##*# •#•u•# •*•***as•#***#?t•#*#•'a'•tt'#*###** $180.00 251 ... - . 31 32 3IFie1CUBBERLEV7 02371 001-400-4601-4201 .00664" *595.00 00768 35443 3- FALL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 50.00 12/05/90 34 F 351 .a.______ # #-VENDOR'' TOTAL ,t 5.5. 00 9 �*************************************i1********** *************** *** * 9 ;'J NI R DATA bAt-E. 00156 "001-400-1206-4201 00787 *237.00 52358 00015 35444 4' I, TAPE STORAGE/TO DEC 11 52358 .11/15/90 ' DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 50.00 12/05!90 4 4 --_-441-3. -.VENDOR-TOTAL ** * gas *********** ********************•** ** ********************** S237.00 4s " - 46 47 49 • DDIVE N' SURF 00604 001-400-2201-4309 00990 *19.00 41462 01123 35445 49 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 90 41462 11/30/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/05/90 sO 52 : I 74•:4#-VENCOR-TOTAL Y•u t:r*#:•**#*•n-*•tt•*•x '#***tt' •*• •u•** •#*•a•**: #*-u•**:tet•***# •• ••'*: #:r *#*#*•b:t#• #•a•*• fir $19.00 s3 54 111 55 - R MIKE*DRC18K'OVICH 02601 001-210-0000-2110 04004. $500.00- 10017 01510. 35446 37 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND '10017 11/29/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/05/90 60 _.__.—._* 4.4" -VENDOR -TOTAL ***********et•x'*:1t* **********•******et**********• ••i **************41.**** ** *500.00 62 03 04 R----EASTMANT I . • 4 • 1-4•Q-1208-4305 00833. *427.96 01026 35447 65 f;- OFFICE SUPP/STOCK/NOV 90 • 11/15/90 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 50.00 12/05/90 G6 G7 1 5P 1,2 99 70 71 IA 72 I.. .. 74 74 G 75 FINANCE—SFA340 'TIME 12:-11:03 FAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND -LIST PAGE 0008 FOR—T2711 /90 ~15ATE 12/Z 7/10 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 15A t L iNVC; PRO -U-4 ACCOUN N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *43' VENDOR'_.TOTAL`.—**4* ** y*-TIac *******4 V **** ******* *# $427. 96 R""— EASY READER PUBLIC NOTICING/OCT 90 0268 VENDOR" TOTAL -"****? as of lE at at •R .. _.__.....EFRAM' "MOBIL ,.MISC. CHARGES/NOV 1990 61593 11/30/90 C' 11 2 J 4 5 6 s 7 8 9 10 12 —00I81 001-4007-1-1-2i=4323 0016 , $1, 128. 78 10/30/90 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING 0268 01127 35446 $0.00 12/05/90 13 14 5 6 $1, 128.18 7 8 19 > 20 01400 00E-400=2mf 4310 00286 $98.85 - N161593 01129 35449 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 12/05/90 R Li -RAM 110131L 01400 001-400=42255=4 11 0022)5 $49.50 • N161593 01129 35449 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 1990 61593 11/30/90 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/05/90 -47 ' VENDOR_.TOTAL***#*#***r*************************: #*****************#******* ******. $148. 35 21 22 23 24 25 26 s 27 28 29 30 31 32 R --STEVE#ENDOM MATERIALS/DELINQ. COURSE 01034 . 001-400=2101-4316 00631 $420.00 11/29/90 POLICE • /TRAINING 01208 35450 $0. 00 12/05/90 33 34 35 . 3[. ..#Y#_.VENDORTOTAI= -:4#4#.-##-#Y# #**-*****#: #*#*#?gar***** *****#*#*#***#*aF*****#*#****** *** $420. 00 1 R! TRUDY*FALLON--- FALL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 37 36 39 40 03306 001-400-4601-4203-0ZfG65 $595.00 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00766 35451; $0. 00 12/05/90 41 42 43 44 ____TE*#_VENDORTOTAL— -3 aFP-4cirivii74#*#?t#***** t: ****##*****: ********#*#*#***#*#*#: * # -* -* $595. 00 STEVE*FIECMAN 0:3161 001-400-4601-4201 00661 $802.20 00771 35452 FALL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 45 46 47 40 49 50 s 51 52 l_.—* * VENDOR --TOTAL- #aa #*4* -41 a44*** #: ###*a*#**: *************•tt*###*** gat******:a*### cl 1' 'I $802. 20 tt t-IRE7SPRINPEER—ADVISORY"B0'i RD 03763 001-400-220T=416 00255 - $50.00 SEMINAR REG/P. OSEKOWSKY 11/29/90 FIRE /TRAINING 11245 35453 $0.00 12/05/90 53 54 55 •.5 57 58 — 59 Y# VENDOR TOTAL ******************************* *******# **********************-x-4#4# $50.00 61 62 s. 63 64 Fi GOVERNMENT—FINANCE—OFCRE—A by 001 —400 —1202 —4316---750352 $ml.00 PUBLICATIONS/FINANCE11/30/90 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 01110 35454 $0.00 12/05/90 65 66 - 67 68 r.9 70 71 72 7! 74 75 79, • • • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009 TIME 12:11:03 FOR 12%1790 DATE 12/06/90 +', • PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO it CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # `ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ._ _...-._. '4*4"'VENDOR' TOTAL at atatit#itit*it?raE3t3r3t*at3t3t3r**3tit3Hretatiratitititatittrat.sitet,t*#it**it3t*3titit*ititit3t***3t3t**ititit* 330. 00 10 - 12 - ` -CALIFORNIA, --INCORPORATED GTE 000f5 UO3--400-1121-4304 00351 30.16 372-6186 01133 35456 '3 FAX BILLING/NOV 90 -6186 11/30/90 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 50.00 12/05/90 14 , � s I 16 R GTE -CALIFORNIA; INCUNNUKAlhU 00015' 001-400-1202-43'b4 00405 $5.99' 372-6186 01133'. 35456 17 18 FAX BILLING/NOV 90 -6186 11/30/90 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 30.00 12/05/90 20 • ---GTE R" CALIFORNIA:' 'INCORPORATED 00015`- `001--4230-120-4304 00409 38. 09 372-6186 01133 35456 21 FAX BILLING/NOV 90 -6186 11/30/90 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 30.00 12/05/90 22 z3 24 R GTE CALIFORNTAINCORFU}AILU 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00295 30.22 ;372-6186 01133 35456. 23 FAX BILLING/NOV 90 -6186 11/30/90 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 30.00 12/05/90 i6 -" -" "CALIFORNIA, R GTE INCORPORATEDi 0005 001-400-1206-4304 00296 343.46 01131 35456 v" ^l S TELE CHARGES/NOV 90 11/30/90 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 30.00 12/05/90 " 1 ' UTE CA-CIFORN • , 1 1 - ■' • • • o • 00 -401-2101-4304 00713 3375.76 01131 35456 "�i TELE CHARGES/NOV 90 11/30/90 'POLICE /TELEPHONE 30..00 12/05/90 3 3 < R-----GTE-CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00310 3168.48 01131 35456 TELE CHARGES/NOV 90 11/30/90 FIRE /TELEPHONE 30.00 12/05/90 a„ ji K GTE -CACI , RATED .00015 001-400-4101-4304 00408 32.27 372-6186 01133 3545 41 1-.1 FAX BILLING/NOV 90 -6186 .11/30/90 PLANNING /TELEPHONE - 30.00 12/05/90/ 42 43 44 --- -'R ----- GTE' CALIFORNIA,-INCORP-ORATED 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00378 32.10 372-6186 01133 35456 •79 FAX BILLING/NOV 90 -6186 11/30/90 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 30.00 12/05/90 4q 48 •- R GIE CACIFUNNiA, Iff ■".'- • ••• •• - 11-4 01-4304 00379 310.30 01131 35456 40 TELE CHARGES/NOV 90 11/30/90 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 30.00 12/05/90 5O - 12. -I --- `--GTE -INCORPORATED 7 "" CALIFORNIA OD015 001-400-4202-4304 00418 i 325.28 372-6186 01133 35456 33 .1 FAX BILLING/NOV 90 -6186 11/30/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 30.00 - 12/05/90 s4 ... 36 FORNTN INCORPORATE O -400-4202-4304 00419 343.46 01131 35456 57 TELE,CHARGES/NOV 90 11/30/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 30.00 12/05/90 sv 80 R GTE -CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00482 $13.87 372-6186 01133 35456 61 17 FAX BILLING/NOV 90 -6186 11/30/90 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE - $0.00 12/05/90 62 a3 64 4a TFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00483 343.46 01131. 35456 65 - TELE CHARGES/NOV 90 11/30/90 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 30.00 12/05/90 66 67 AA 70 71 72 73 74 75 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME '12:11T03 FOR 121T1790 " PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # . "" DESCRIPTION DALE INVL PROT;# ACCOUNT DESCFUF't IUN AMOUNT IJNENC DATE -15P PAGE 0010 DATE 12/06790 R' "'" GTE CALIFORNIA, TNCORPORAIEIs UUU i 5 110=-406=3302=4304----0040/ $0-66 11 3 4 872-6186 01133 35456 FAX BILLING/NOV 90 -6186 11/30/90 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE. $0.00 12/05/90 5 6 7 6 0 10 11 12 .*** VENDOR ' TOTAL- : **#** •###44# -&?I# "&W *#at**#*###*#*** -x -***#**##*#n **##***## $743. 56 R GTEL 01:340 oo =400=2101-4304 00711 $5T756 1138805 01134 35457 EQUIP RENTAL/DEC 90 38805 11/22/90 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 12/05/90 .3 14 15 16 17 16 20 #=# ' VENDOR" TOTAL:??- #4#'#?1#=41-41###?i4" bf 4" ##* *#*#* ****: # z-#**: ##It: # -ar##***#?r#*###*#**** CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 'GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 02623 001-400-1212-41$e---Ui 922 11/19/90 EMP BENEFITS $51. 56 $2,408.44 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00001 35458 $0. 00 12/05/90 D2623----105=400=2601-4180 oro48 $23.52 11/19/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 25 00001 35458 $0.00 12/05/90 23 30 31 32 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 GUARD' AN DENTA 02623 110-400-3302-418$-D1262 $92.67 • 00001 35458 11/19/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 33 34 35 36. R 02623 f45-400-340--418 Of013 $2.99 00001 35458 11/19/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 37 311 39 40 GUARDIAN- DENTAL 02623 145-400-3402-418a---01017 $1.20 00001 3545y, CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 41/19/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90' R---_...._GUARDIAN-DENTAL 02623 145-4250=3403-4188 00328 $1.41 00001 35458 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 BUS PASS-SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 • GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 160-400-3102-410g---009925 $2.01 .00001 35458 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 41 4'. U 11 n5 51 Ii at 42 43 44 45 40 47 411 431 30 51 32 GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 170-400-2103-4188 00046 t $23.52 00001 35458 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 53 54 35 56 • GUARDIAN -DENIAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 • GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00354 $29.92 00001 35458 11/19/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 02623 705-400-1217-4188 0036.3 11/19/90 WORKERS COMP 57 50 50 J. 60 • 42. $44.88 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS #43F -VENDOR -"TOTAL -*# #114"&W4#*####*#*#if#####*########*#;f#*###****#**#*****#*#*3}***#** $2, 650. 56 00001 35458 $0.00 12/05/90 61 62 6 65 66 67 60 Ft •HAEPRIN SUPPLY -COMPANY 00946 001-400-2207=4309 00991 $93.94 49680 11241 35459 NOZZLE REBUILD KIT 49680 11/14/90 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $93.94 12/05/90 09 70 71 72 . /3 e 74 75 7 c a�J FINANCE-SFA340 12: i1: 03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/11/90 PAGE 0011 DATE 12/06/90 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND tF ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO $ CHK $ DATE INVC PROJ $ -ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP .. . _._ #4# VENDOR"TOTAC 4 ****-tt**- *****. #***#!t#*****#*#*#*#*#*#***#*#*#*#*#*#***####*#*## 11 7 y $93. 94 HERM-BCH'YOUTH"BASEBALL-LEAGUE -00820 001-400=4L'01-4201 00672 $1,000.00 CONTRACT PAYMENT/FY 91 00756. 35460 12/03/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT. $O. GG 12t05/90 4?'###4F###################*####*###*#**#######fir##..##:########.u, P." """ - HERMOSA" ANIMAL HOSP ITAC MISC. CHARGES/NOV 90 1. 000. 00 06322 X01-4250-2401-4201 00266 $83.85 11/30/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ?.L44-VNDOR-TOTAL#**#####*#*#*#*******.*#***#****##***#**#*####*###**#*#*-n*##*##### $83.65 01135 35461 $0. 00 12/05/90 a 10 11 41. 12 13 21 zz 23 y 24 25 29 27 J. R" HEWLETT-PACKARD-COMPANY00I 9 001-400-1206-4201 00785 $1,287.002n COMPUTER SYS MAINT/NOV90 E1E87 11/01/90 55E1E87 0 35462 2a DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $ $009 0.00 12/05/90 3; 31 �. 33 -- —.#4 VENDOR-TDTAI-4 4##"#*#*#*#*#*#**-#*#*#***#***#*#*###*****#*#*#*#*#*##**#*#*#*#*#** $1.287.00 LORI#HIGGINS — FALL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 01404 001-400-4601-4201 00666 $70.00 00765 35463 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 i t OTAL #####444'####*###*#*#*#####*#*#######*###at•#*#***#*#*###*****#*#***#*# $70. 00 _ .s J. -13--' --INST OF TRANSPORTATION-ENGRS 02479- 001-400-4202-4315 00063 $130.00 19522 01419 35464 DUES/A. ANTICH 19522. 11/13/90 PUB WKS ADMIN /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 12/05/90 Y DR TO s AL 4#4###*###*#*#*#?## -########*#######*#######*#####*###?t*############ $130. 00 37 "MO 41 42 47 4. 4n 45 .:n 47 i. INTERNATIONAL CONT-OF-BOIEDING 00667 001-400-4201-4315 00098 1 $150.00 M25261 00654 35465 DUES/B. GROVE 25261 11/01/90 BUILDING /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 12/03/90 44—VENISOrt tUTAL*#-###*4**f##tt-####*#############*#######*#####4#4################### $150.00 J C -PAPER 03083 001-400-1208-4305 00832 $1,123.86 80088950 01102 35466 COPIER PAPER/STOCK 88950 11/16/90 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/05/90 ### VtNDUR t O t AL ##############?###########:>f#####*###:a###*####### u###*#####: ######az•## $1,.123.86 4t 49 50 51 .i• .2 53 55 .y 56 57 50 51+ N.A. ao IVERY, IN"6. 00281 061-2T0-0000-2110 04009 $115.05 65320 01405 35467 DELIVERY/STRAND HOTEL 65320 10/31/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/05/90 61 63 .y 64 65 60 67 .y 69 70 71 sit 72 73 74 75 v. 73 FINANCE-SFA340 T I MF 1'1 • i l • 0", CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0012 Cy PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF- PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE-INVC— PR03-# -ACCOUNT-DESCRIFTIDN AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 6 .__ *** VENDOR TOTAL-:'+'t*'#ifaf*'*3F###3F"x•;f#*#3Hi*#*'#***-*#;{3tares; F,`F'$****'-*';i• ' ###dF•tt•#4•3f'ii#at,'tT444'4* •# $11v�. O4 - a 10 - 12 R ._ . STAN =KIM 0283. U01=400-4601=4201 (5062 $630.00. 00770 35468 13 FALL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 14 s I 16 --"- " R-- --- STAN*KIM 02833-00-17--400=1F601-14261 -00671 -$7400.00 00773 35468 17 t TENNIS CHALL. DIRECTOR 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90- . �o 20 * * VENDOR' TOTAL' ** ****########'###*****• '*****4*#'*****at•pit*•************•*t************* $1,030.00 21 22 • • : 23 24 R L. A. -BASIN-CHAPTER 03756 001-400-42014316 00222 $125. 00 : 00655 35469 25 SEMINAR REG/B. GROVE 11/29/90 .BUILDING /TRAINING $0.00 12/05/90 6 28 "*w*' VENDOR...TOTAL--#***4********'*****•4********•***********star******•********************** $125.00 29 30 • - 31 32 R--UAKEWOOD-FIP bHtVICL 03748 001-400-4204-4321 00530 $269.67 84168 01092 35470 33 RAILING/FOGHORN ON PIER 84168 11/27/90 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $269.67 12/05/90 34 3 36 . .-_.._.__._*4*_ VENDOR_..TOTAL'?i•*=7F*#Y-k•#*•u'#}•>t:'•tt'ar•irat•tt'at'3t*#at•;t•*?t->E#aa•bat#•;tar3t•tt•at•tt'*atot#•gat#arat•tr*•b••tt-n•#it•••b•at'tt- $269. 67 • 37 3 3 4 ..11 '-R" L1NDA*EDUKL 02832 - 001-400-4601-4201 00660 $507.50 00767 3547. 41 FALL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 4L ,1 *#* VENDOR TOTAL **#4**a€*at•tt*•t4*-4?t•b•**tit•3t•tt•atititat?t•batatit3t*•bat bat#•;Eit,tat3t3tit•u"it•tt'it;f?tat"b•at '#at#:a'at?tat*#•;tat*•b'- $507.50 45 46 47 40 ti LONIiA I3LUEFR-IMI 1SLKVic:E, INC. .00071 305-400-8406-4201 00027 $61241 264(574/263644 01410 35472 40 BLUPRINT SERVICES. 63644 .. 10/31/90 CIP 88-406 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 O SI ;; "-----#"I* VENDOR TOTAL'*4****a***************ataf*•nat*atatat******ata•*****•b'atatatatatat*at**4*•: ******at•b{at ,$612.41 63 54 41 33 41 - 116 CANCTUNEROS MAST - ' • • • -,, • • - • 00-4601-4201 00662 $100.00 - 00775 35473 D7 CHRISTMAS CAROL LEADERS 11/28/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 se ZO aft-,i-VENDU- i UTAL : *'#4 dtY**,i.atat****** ****at#atatatat•?t#•b-#*#atat*#?fat;fat•b* ****•b•at•b'at#• *af•b**at'at? *** $100. 00 61 62 .t' - 63 �.,. 64 .N MAIN biNEti IUURS U3549 001-400-4601-43Z58---210470 $1,560.00 00752 35474 65 EXCURSION TICKETS/C. RES 12/03/90 COMM RESOURCES "/PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 12/05/90 667 31 60 69 _ - - 70 71 -.y 72 73 74 755 ) Ant age 4111, 40 r w F _I NANCE—SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0013 r.;• :.d V 1 UMIC . L#vo/7V PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # - 3 CHK # 4 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD ?f ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 6 .. " _#?4#.- 78 � VENDOR—TOTAL-** •tt-.a* *•=!-at?t* fat#*** •tt•rt-•tt•at-ar?rarer•ar#•uat•#at•u••tt•-n•#•tt-?t•tt•##at•tt-•?tat-*at*-tt#•it#•tt••it-at•*st-##•tt••tt•* *•x** $1,.560.00 s, 10 " ...MANHATTAN 12 R FORD • 00b05 U0=400-3302-4311 00650 $91.85 109595 01144 35475 13 MISC: CHARGES/NOV-90 09595 11/30/90 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/05/90 13 ____ _###--VENDOR—TOTAL 6 17 4*,44 • #atm# #afar•ar*•3t##-T---tt•###at-##3t###atatatatat#a-#•;t*ate--x-at##•;t#*#*ar•n-*##ar#atatat•at#*** $91.85 1 e IG -. .•' 20 R MARINA INN 03755 om-400-2101-4312 01582 $297.00 - 01206 35476 21 HOTEL/V. STRASER 12/03/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 12/05/90 za ----M—VENDOR—TOTAL 24 * jt -r *44at•tt->z-#####•frac•tt-etataHt-x•**•fr##aratat-fr-tt•-tt-#at-x-ar#•tt-#at#-zt#•n•#at•tt-at#ef3rarat##et##atarat- ••b--n•at# $297.00 25 26 ---` "SANDRA?fMARTEL 27 R 037b4 001-300-0000-3212.00053 $50.00 7804 00292 35477 ''' ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 7804 11/20/90 /ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS $0.00 ---4W-.VENDOR 12/05/90 X31 37 TWAL AL #########ar#######etas#at#•tt•-ft#at#at##at:a-##•x•#:ratat?F#et•a-afar?r##--##?t####•n•-?rat•rr##ar#ar#•x- $50. 00 —MICHAELS j3 R. 03167 001-400-4601-4308 00469 $236.10 01145 35478 3.} I, (,., MISC- CHARGES/NOV 90 11/30/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 12/05/903, I: 40 ### VENI3uR I U I AL *******#at#ar***at fat#******#*#at#at#*#***#at#*afar****###*#at#*** *azar##**** $236. 10 41 - _ 43 '-F:--__M0NARc}4 44 BROCIM 00004 001-400-2101-4309 0.0359 $240.19 7695 01147 35479 43j MISC. CHARGES/NOV 90 7895 11/30/90 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 - 12/05/9041 .y .. 48 c, ## VENDUR I U I AL atar#######afar##ar####:•###aratatar##ataratat##arat;tar?tat *atat#at**###afar• aHrat•Iraratatar####arat# $240.19 49 ' - - - 50 51 fa -17 52 NIBBLE 03766 001-400-2101-4305 01391 1` $19.95 00969 35480 53 :1 SUBSCRIPTION/POLICE' 12/03/90 - POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES - 50.00 12/05/90 5< 58 4:m-VEN11UFt i U I AL ######afar•;Fara;-#afar#*###****######****#•;far##*####at########*###rar*at##:gar*#;tar $19.95 57 56 59 J------_.R__—-'OLYMPIC—AUTO-•CENTEK 00 00093 705-400-1210-4324 00040 $119.53 12130 01302 35461 61 7 PUB WKS VEHICLE REPAIR 12130 11/19/90 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS$119:93 12/05/90 G7 • 64 .. NTDCR 1 U 1 AL ############################at###?t###########?f###•carat### •ar ##�•#####- # $119.53 65 ..� .. 66 67 68 R ORAL HEALT4 SERVICES 02S5 -----o01-400-1212-4188 01921 $1,397.24 00019 35462 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 0 71 r2 r - - - 74 .•; ] ' 75 75 ] r.;• :.d V 1 FIN,'yNCE-SFA340 • TIME 12:11:03 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FfIR 7 2 TT79A PAGE 0014 • PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE--INVC-- PRO -O.#. --ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION7 AMOUNf UNENC DATE EXP s" 1 7 -SERVICES -00235 R ORAL HEALTH 105=400-2601-4188--010047 —47745- 00019 360482 . CITY HEALTH INS/'DEC 90 11/19/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 1O it 2 R ORAL HEALTH SERV•ICES-'--'-" ----- ---00235 .109=4001=3301-4128 00051 $7.19 00019 '35482 '3 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 • 11419/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - $0.00 12/05/90 la --- .- R' . ORAL "HEALTH'SERVICES 002351T0-400=-3302- 41AS 0"1231 $264. 74 00019 35482 '6 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 .11/19/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 e - .. 20 R:- ORAL HEALTH'SERVICES 06235 i 55-400-340f-4188 01012 $1.29 . 00019 35482 21 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 DIAL A RIDE_ /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 ?� . .-- ---`-- 24 - --'ORAL'-HEAL-TFT' R"- SERVICES 00235 145-400-34252=4-f88 01016 $0.31 00019 35482 25 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 50.00 12/05/90 26 ....... 20 - -ORAL R HEALTH' SERVICES- 00235---T55--400-=2-102-4188 00562 $7.04 00019 35482 _j CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 50.00 12/05/90 31 f a -- _ 1rORALHEALTH-SERVICE 00235 160-400-3102-4188 00969 542.39 00019 35482 3" CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0..00 12/05/90 J5 -'':....-ORAL' -SERVICES R HEALTH 00235 170-4025=0-03-4188 00045 $61.17 00019 35482 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 50.00 12/05/90 3 9 O -**, 1 VENDOR-TOT"ALS## 4###•tt••;t*•tt"*#** #at*x•* ******#aa# **** t•? ******* *** '#• ****#: •b•#*.t •at# . $1,626.62 ,� s1 42 43 __'-------R----PACIFIC-ROOFING iy DESIGN DF 03751 001-300-0000-3115 03235 $110.00 684000 11048 35483 45 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 84000 11/20/90 /BUSINESS LICENSE 50.00 12/05/90 4C a7 4,1 * VEND'DR-TOTAL '•&4# ?F#• *• •u'•?faa#•i1. *gat#re•#tt3Ftt*##u•;r#3e****#•x••tt•arit •irae•ttarat?t**** t3t•x'•tt#*#•tt••x**•tt•*** $110.00 43 - - 60 31 52 R PACIFICARE (50575 001-400-1212-4188 01925 1519,136.74 00016 35484 53 C1 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 50.00 12/05/90 S4 ti 50 H PACIFICARE— 00575 105-400=2En=4f88 01 049 $535.57 00016 35484 57 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 50.00 12/05/90 56 60 R PACIFICARE 06575 1019-4a(5-8301-4188 -00060 588.28 00016 35484 61 - CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 62 ' 63 54 K FACTFICARE 005/5 110-400-33024188 0f2b5 $-,645.63 00016 35484 65 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 85 56 69 70 72 73 .!4 74 75 7• s • s s 4- i F I NANCE-SFA340 - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE Ni) 0015 - ----. --- --- -- .... �._. ..a. IJIY1G 19.!UO/7U .. 2 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 4 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 4 rACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 4 --------"R"-- i--- PAC IF! CARE- 00375 145-400-3401-4188 01015 $31.99 00016 35484 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/03/90 ItoI ""--- '-----'-"----' ---'--i.-45=400=3402-4188 •----01-01:--------------i-16:-TE.------ - `• R 7 PAC IFICARE 0d575 00016 35=1134 13 14 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $6.00 12/05/90is -_. - -- --R----- 1. PAC IFICARE 00575 155-400=23 2-4188 00584 $71.59 00016 35484 17 CITY'HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 16 2 .....PACIFICARE R. 21 '00575 T60-400-3102-4188 00992 $555.67 00016 35484 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 22 23 RPACIFICARE 00575 170-400-2103-4188 00048 3688.03 00016 35484 25 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 2f. 27 --_-' _'""" '-""-" ""' - -_---00575---705-400-1209-4188 R PAC IFICARE" 00355 $159.80 00016 35484 --1 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 R YACTFIC-ARE 00575 705-400-1217-4188 00365 $159.80 00016 35484 1 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 11/19/90 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 31' ----*- -VENDOR -TOTAL 7W 4*******it****************************-******-?t*-***-#**********4******* $24r 068. 26 . 37 4G t-AC1EL CELLULAR - LA 03209 001-400-2101-4304 00712 $822.35 01150 354815 41 MOBILE PHONE CHCS/NOV 90 .•11/30/90 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 12/05x'90 42 -.--.__.4.4*._.'VENDOR"`TOTAL *3t*************-x-***-*#-3<--*****************-x-4*******4* **-***4*********** $822.35 45 .16 '. .. 47 46 R-FIASTIUKIWATEL 03759 001-210-0000-2110 03999 3250.00 02971 11054 35486 49 �•. TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 02971 11/27/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/05/90 3° ---._ 32 -`._._ -VENDOR --TOTAL -IT: W ************-tt-:**********************-*****xat:y-*** *t****-***�*****-*** $250.00 53 IFI 54 12 s 3 K IJMO-AASSIICTATES 01183 001-400-2101-4312 01580 3299.00 01207 35487 57 TUITION/V. STRASER 11/29/90 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE / POST $0.00 12/05/90 50 I.5 40 - --' ***-.VENDOR TOTAL Vit#-:-4******************************-*************************4F******* 3299.00 61 a2 63 .10 - - 64 9, *P-ONCTANO 02967 001-400-4601-4201 00667 $507.50 00774 35488 G3 FALL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 30.00 12/05/90 ae ; 60 69 70 11 72 13 75 75. t4 ':T T'I'C 4-111 'x v y qI • 'I Y(f 4; ',;• i x1 F 3 . 4:* +.• FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0016 ,1ic. aa.vu ruff 1/i1/YU - 1 • I2/Ub/y0 t PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO '# CHK # i_.. -DATE-INCA--PROTI DESCRIPTION ` ACCOONT-DESCH1P I IDN MOM' DATE EXP 6 -43 #** VENDOR TOTAf_-***-****'*?S•#*#'x^,F.g'# # ****Y#r###3F4' -# -.#?t- : # €*-*4-4-4 ;1 ## $507.50 it to 12 . --POSTMASTER P 0LS398 001=400-4LD1-431 05 00$90— $,20 00 00755 354B9 13 POSTAGE/SPRING BROCHURE 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/05/90 11 is 15 "'TOTAL -"*' --"* *�'`VENDOR * Immi.**** #* #Oat**** *********###t' #4 *4************* $1,200.00 .. 17 16 19 '"'R- ----- 20 READ ICARE=DANIEE FREEMAN' 02390 00E-4013=1203-4320 -063-42 $237.00 94-41192 01308 35490 21 PRE -EMP PHYSICALS/OCT 90 41192 11/06/90 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 12/05/90 22.z 24 .:,..—__..'_--***- VENDOR-TDTAE- 1 4-411- ' #####tt-stat#-tt#iE#ik##########?t#atu-?t#-?t*,t*atiF3t*at******#?t3Ht#-:tat-aHtatif?Htat# $237.00 t 25 26 27 ! _-......_-.._ 23 R-"...--_.RMRS SYSTEMS 01 30CY 001-400=1208-4-305 00834 $2,000.00 08039 35491 24 RESET POSTAGE METER - 11/27/90 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES _ $0.00 12/05/90 331 I- 32 L. — * -VEi1TDUK I UTAS -44 ,r?E#, #**#### t###*at##iF*iF##*it##�t#*####*#:gat####*as#*###a>•##*###at#at###as# $2,000.00 33 .I 34 I.._ 35 36 --"R'—"--TOADLZNE PRIIDUCTS 02914 001-400-3104-4309 00609 $68.38 1137 01094 35492 3' 1^_ WHIP HOSE/PAINT SPRAYER 1137 11/26/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $68.38 12/05/90 3i 1,1 au ***-t7EN0Uh IUTAL-*Y 3h- ###*##*#'f ###*#***###*'z ******#?t#,#*.z.t**#***#*#*,r•?t•******#*# $68. 38 41 •' ' - - 42 43 64 -7-"--"R-------"ED*RuzAR-9y--ASSOCTATE5 01578 0017=21-15=0-000=2110 04010 $187.50 90426 01098 35493 4s ENGR SERV/STRAND'HOTEL 90426 11/01/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/05/90 46 47 an h 1=IJ4RUZAK V-ASSOCTATt8 015/8 001-400-3104-4'201 00068 $1,075.00 �i0426 01098 35493 49 71 ENGRG SERV/OCT 90 - - 90426 11/01/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 50 st _32 to 4* -"VENDOR -TOTAL *Y: at-?>•a?t ##: a*#:tt**##*## -********n-*#*#*#*tt-?I#: * #***#*#*#?r#*###*#*#4# $1,262.50 33 51 R S. -F-: Ab OTTATE5 03338 001-21O-0005=2110 04008 $750.00 1 01089 35494 57 SEWER REP./STRAND HOTEL 1 11/13/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $800.00 12/05/90 59 59 fig 80 *. VENDOR-TOTAL******************************************************************** $750.00 61 ,762 63 19 64 . H SAFEWAY-SIGTT-COMPANY 00021 001-4M-310-21-3037 00 108 —x461.69 39321 01025 35495 0s STREET SIGNS 39321 10/19/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $739.25 12/05/90 s6 67 11 69 • 70 71 72 73 74 75 • 76 41 1 1 1 1 1 414, r :.1 �tI I 1 FINANCE-SFA340 i2:11:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0017 FOR 17IT790 DATE 12/06/90 • VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO (t CHK # DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VENDOR TOTAL- #-4'W**************************************************************** R " - SCAGMD • PUBLICATIONS/BLDG AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $461. 69 2 3 7 8 9 10 •12 03757 -7-CM1-400=4201-4305 00615 $5.50 00653 35496 11/29/90 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/05/90 16 H-1------314:4r.VENDOR TOTAL **41************************************************************* $5. 50 -R---7-MICHAEL*SCHUBACH7 MONTHLY EXP/NOV 90 • 005.36 0o1=400=4T732-4-316 0t05 $11.75. 17 18 19 20 11/30/90 PLANNING COMM- ./TRAINING it -*T -VENDOR -1-01-AL-44-41F4*****************gWV4****************************************** • • " • • • • R • SHER IFF7S- DEPARTMENT ODT51 01-400-2101-4251 10882 35497 $0.00 12/05/90 21 22 za it) $11.75 • 4) Ei) kJ eJ t.) ; 24 25 26 27) !.) BOOKING FEES/AUG 90 30258 11/15/90 POLICE . /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0_00. 12/05/90 , _ *44f VENDOR t iAL ****************************************************************** $446.28 33 34 31 ----------R-7-- SINCLAIR-PAINT-CO. 01.39 001=-400-4204-4309 01826 $285.31 01159 35499 .27 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 1990 11/30/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/05/90 $285. 31 i 43 R'SIRSPEEDY.:4 001/.1 001-400-4601-4302 00121 $122.05 12604 00753 35500 45 TYPESET/HOLIDAY FLYERS 12604 11/17/90 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING $122.05 12/05/90 46 48 h bIR SPEEDY 00361 001-400-4601-4302 001 $134.63 12429 00727 35500 .9 ,:. YOUTH VOLLEYBALL FLYER 12429 10/15/90 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING $134.63 12/05/90 .1, 52 .-..------***-VENDOR7TOTAU-41-44*4*4********************************************************4T4; $256.6853 •. 54 ,,. 1Z .r EMARTTPI-FITIA - a--.1, 9. • li -400-2101-4306 00895 $77. 77 01160 35501 ,, 1.1 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 90 11/30/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/02/90 a , 60 'R 'SMART -P.,: -IR F I NAL.- TS -COMPANY- 00114 001-400-4601-4305 00889 $40.34 . 01160 35501 61 17 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 90 11/30/90 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/05/90 " • . 64 VI H----SKART-& FTNAEtRis COMPANY 00114 001-400-4601-4308 00468 $59.06 01160 35501 65 ' MISC. CHARGES/NOV 90 11/30/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 12/05/90 066, II 68 60 7C 71. 72 73 ' 74 75 ' . 1%) Q.) 1 FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0018 111'IC_ L . 11:11,3 -._ FOR- 12/11/90----- - DATE 12/06/90 tl . PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # ' DESCRIPTION- -" DATE INVC— PROD I 'ACCOUNTDESCRIPTIDN AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 6 7 a -TOTAL- *V4 VENDOR" *at4##at-*#### *4*- F g-# ?I r T** *********************** $177A7 0 - - 0 ..... _ . . P.....__._.. G.,-• SCOTT*SMITH . . - 0330/ • 001-:4-00-74601-4201 00663 $595:00 00769 35502 3 FALL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PPIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 4 s _—_ 16 -VENDOR --TOTAL *4* ***********&***********###*#4*****************4********at****** $595. 00 17 7. _ tG +:-, ,C 19 20 '. ' " ` - R""-...-•''SOUTH"`B AY-FIRE7EYTINDUISHER— 001T3 001-=400-211-31-4309 00360 $37. 10 10839 01161 35503 21 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 90 10839 11/30/90 POLICE 0 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS$0.00 12/05/90 �3 24 "4**- VtNDDR-TOTAL-*****#4****-Y************************aHt*•tt•ttat*at--tt•43t*-n••n•#[-;t-u•.u*•x••x.#•x••tt.*#*.•n••>f $37. 10 , 25 26 - 27 29 ---R-----.SOUTH-COAST AIR GUACTiY 0T68 001-400-3104-43i1 00053 $185.00 007274-12-90 01100 35504 2 - ANNUAL PERMIT/GAS TANK 12-90 10/16/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/05/90 3O 31 i.. J2 -VENDDR-TOTAL • — Y* *********************** ******************,*tat********4***********4 $185.00 3 3 J' -7-03416 R. . SOUTHERN- -CAL. TREE & LANDSCAPE 001-202-0000-2020 01119 $2,227.50 01031 35505 - 3 FINAL RETENTION 12/03/90 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $0.00 12/05/90 3G j- 13 R --SOUTHERN CAL. 1 RLL ,et. LANDSCAPE. 03416 001-400-6101-4201 00210 $247.50 010.31 3350;5 41 i FINAL RETENTION -12/03/90 PARKS /CONTRACT.SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 G2 47 14 _-4 #-VENDOR__TOTA�x-tt: * ••tt:t**********at** tat*****at*at***at?tat ********* ** rat******zat*******at $2,475.00 4 4n 47 H SGULLKERS Ys HhRB (1:.34130 001-400-4601-4308 0047'2 $269. 49 00759 _ 35506 49 T-SHIRTS/TENNIS CHALLENG 11/20/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $229.46 12/05/90 5C 31 32 G-; F SGUEEKERS & HER 03480 001-400-4601-4308 00473 i- $132.1000729 35506 63 I,1 T-SHIRTS/TENNIS CHALLENG 11/20/90 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $172_.13 12/05/90 34 I. 3 L_ *4-4-VENDOR-TDTAE-**44mT**4 ## ##at#oat#***************at*tt-**at****at**** ******** *at $401.59 47 1;1- 513 I.. 60 "--__'" "R- "--"RODERICK*STEWART 03765- 001-300-0000-:1212 0070-54 $50. 00 6717 00291 35507 61 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 6717 12/03/90 /ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS $0.00 12/05/90 62 GJ 64 **3�VENDOR-T•OTAG ###*ai*4#44 F##44'#w44?Hf####*********#*4al at at4**at*at*******at*#****** $-50700— 63 �„ G6 60 R TAKATA NURSERY— 027497 001-400-3IZii=4309 00074 $939.40 2396 01408 35508 59 POINSETTIAS/DOWNTOWN 2396 11/21/90 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $939.40 12/05/90 70 71 72 I. -i • 7q .M v. FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0019 '- ---TIME' 1271E 03 FOR f /11/90 DATE 12/06/90 1\ i 2 3 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 6 8 .------4C44 • VENDOR`TOTAU-4•h#tt #fFu ** •** ••tt•#atas?tal•*•it•gat•st•tt?t#at•*•x•atat*•sE•u••tHtat**•n••n••p••tt•at•tt•*#*•b•atat•tr•tt•p•tt•tt•ts•at*i••x•** $939.40 9 10 I2 P-..----TARGHEE, -INC. .. 03-630 001-406=If -4241 00003 $2,888.74 09180 35509 13 TOXIC REP/PROSPECT-SOUTH -- 12/01/90 CITY COUNCIL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT . 33.500.00 12/06/90 ,z 16 I + . 4* VENDON L UTAL • • '#-4 *#•?r**•jai•*##*#?+# •#•tt•###ia##•##at###?t###•;t•u••7•#•n•u•3+•#•nas•##*• •*#•3t•u •##*###*## 32, 888.74 17 2 18 Y` - - 19 20 R --" CITY iJF#TORRANCE 00841 100-3402-4201 00154 $1,525.57 102109 10881 35510 21 CITY-SHARE/MAX VEHICLE 02109 10/24/90 COMMUTER BUS /CONTRACT SERVICES $0.00 12/05/90 22 23 24 •— 4 4 VENDU( TDTAL # #t��t•*****x-********######********######*****############****#####. $1,525.57 = 25 26 ' - - 27 �•, - 20 --•-U: ---- 'R S7 -WEST- PUBLIC -S AFETV ROUP . 03767 001-400-2101-4201 00697 $1,067.50 34086 01109 35511 REDO WARR LOST IN MAIL 34086 11/29/90 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 37 R U.ST'7WEST-PUBEIC SAFETY GROUP 03767 001-400-210.1-4201 00698. 313,221.84 34446 01109 35511 REDO WARR LOST IN MAIL 34446 11/29/90 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 30.00 12/05/90 3' 3" -- "-•-R---'---U: S--WEST-PUBLIC- EAFET'r ROOF 037b7 001-400-2201-4201 00178 *8,814.56 34446 01109 35511 REDO WARR LOST IN MAIL 34446 11/29/90 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 1' UR i U I AL############*****#*•###########•3 *******######**** t#####****##*####### $23, 103.90 a 43 44 - R '-.--_UNIFORCE-CORPORATION 01720 001-400-1206-4201 00786 $1,006.00 900548 00074 35512 45 FUEL SYS MAINT/JAN-MAR91 00548 11/16/90 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $O. GO 12/05/90 47 an r #WVENDOR-TOTAL*******-**##*#*•###*#########at#****######**-**at##*#-?t#•:t#?t#•+t########### 31, 006. 00 49 - 50 31 --- -THEUNION-CENTRAL-LIFE-INS L.-- R-----.. -CO. 02355 001-400-1212-4188 01920 5654.35 00028 .35513 5a I:1 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 12/01/90 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/03/90 ; 56 17 R TREUNION-CENTRAL FIFE INS CO. 02-J55 105-400-2601-4188 01046 $17.15 00028 33313 37 �.•• CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 12/01/90 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/03/90 5996 I '60 •---•-`R"" " -- THE#UNION CENTRAL LIFE TNS• Cir 02355 109-400-3301-4188 00057 31.54 00028 35513 G1 2 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC'90 12/01/90 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS3 0.00 12/05/90 a3 1 H—THE#UNION CENTRAL ETFE INS CO. 02355 110-400-3302-4188 01260 $119.35 00028 35513 65 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 12/01/90 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 O6 a7 99 111, 79 71 94 72 .: 7] • 74 17 75 a.) • .a/ .a, m✓ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:11:03 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST ' FOR 12/11790. VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE TNVC---PROJ-Ir ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION R. '' THE#UNION CENTRAL -LIFE -INS -CU. 02355-14 -400=3401-4188 OiOni CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 12/01/90 DIAL A RIDE THE#UNION CENTRAL -LIFE -INS -007-----U2355 145-400-3402-4385 0I0T5 CITY.HEALTH'INS/DEC 90 12/01/90 ESEA --- 'THE*UNION-CENTRAS-FIFE INS-007-----D2355-----1.55=400-2102=416---005U1 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 12/01/90 CROSSING GUARD I,.___._....THE*UNION CENTRAS -LIFE -TNS -CO. 02355 160=400=ST02-4188 00988 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 12/01/90 SEWER/ST DRAIN PAGE 0020 1SATE 1701;/90 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP. so. 84 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00028 35513 $0. 22 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/05/90 J) 3 4 5 7 9 2 00028 35513 $0. 00 12/05/90 5T.b1 /EMPLOYEE_ BENEFITS 00028 35513 $0.00 12/05/90 20 ""R ` - THE#UNION-CENTRAL CTrt IN 55 170-400-2103-4I88 00044 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 "'-THE*UNION CENTRAL -LIFE -INE -C-O. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 $18. 69 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00028 35513 $0.00 12/05/90 21 2 3 24 12/01/90 SPEC INVESTGTNS $26. 25 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 232355 -705-4-00-11209-4188 00353 $2.80 12/01/90 TRE#UNION "CEN i NAL LITE INS -007-2355 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 90 12/01/90 00028 35513 $0.00 12/05/90 25 7 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 705L-400-1217=4188 00362, $2.80 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS #4-# VENDOR -TOTAL- 4?,*4-44****#****:**#***#*#*###*###*#***#***#*#******##*#***#u#**## R' -UNITED-STATES POSTAL SERVICE CITE NOTICE POSTAGE 460 00028 35513 $0. 00 12/05/90 00028 35513 $0. 00 . 12/05/90 $845. 60 00740 •110-400-3302=4305 00739 $2, 000. 00 2. 3C 3, 32 33 34. 33 37 70 40 12/03/90 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -.4** VENDOR "TOTAL *#4#***4 *4 ######**** ***************4###*#4****.3H ***************4**- • R` -UST, IN . • PROJECTOR/SCREEN/C. RES 12599 460 00295 3551f *0. 00 12/05/90 132, 000. 00. 03725 001-400-4L01-5401 00065 $"43 6 civ 14. Ju 4, 42 4u 43 44 45 40 47 20 11/12/90 COMM RESOURCES /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 .__----#v#-VENDOR ._TOTAL- 4#4at-r4;I*#*#*#*;s•-#n#*#*#***#*****#***-tt***#*-***;t•?t•-n ***R**-******#* 1 ., 1,1 112599 00748 35515 $416.30 12/05/9050 40 51 52 $343. 56 03374 001-400=4601-4201 00659 $196.00 FALL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 11/27/90 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT VENDOR TOTAL **e?#**=*Y*###*:t*Y-tt##*#*#: *x##*##*#:##-xx#*#:t#***#:r*:t##*####za* ##*#-z *# R- J75. #WARD -&-CD. AS""FiGENT FON REIMB LIAR CLAIMS/OCT 90 ' 02466 10/31/90 00772 35516 $0. 00 12/05/90 53 54 57 50 50 60 $196. 00 705=4150-1204-420T (56363 $18,077.24 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 01309 35517 $0. 00 12/05/90 Yu 61 62 43 J r4 1.5 69 67 J 613 71) 71 72 I3 74 75 70 FINANCE—SFA340 —T'—'TIME 12:11:03 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0021 FOR 12/11/90 DATE 12/06/90 PAYVENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO €# CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP — — �--�---5.TJAi 1S i• -CT AS AGENT FOR REIMS LIAR CLAIMS/OCT 90 1� 3 7 6 02466 705-400-1209-4324 00154 $390.27 10/31/90 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS irA4 -VENDOR - TOTAL ******* -*********•**************************.3 *******#aFP•, •u•#*****#*** • $18,467.51 _,—.R._._-._ ELA1NE-M-#IdEINE 03375 001-400-4601-4201 00668 FALL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 11/27/90 01309 33517 $0. 00 12/05/90 12 ,3 15 16 $1,645.00 00764 35518 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 • ** - VENDOR TOTAL *#4# -#****-*x*•x-#*#*#?r**•tt•**********; * •st****=F*• #•tt•#*•;F*•zf*# •#aric-*******# # .$1,645.00 WESTIN HOTEL 03752 001-400-1202-4317 00068 $85.32 TR318 00318 35519 LODGING/V. COPELAND TR318 11/29/90 FINANCE ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE # # VENDOR -TOTAL ##,A#•*##4*****#*###�t#*#########*######################*•##########*### $85.32 SEC SERV/9-18,11-6,90 $0. 00 12/05/90 17 119 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 26 00140 001-400-41.02-4201 00280• $433.50 10880 35520 11/19/90 PLANNING COMM. /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/05/90 VENDOR" TOTAL *•#:######*****#########****###4*****:###*#*•###***#######*#########4# $433. 50 • • 37 33 34 ,s WIDE WIDETIIHEELS .03758 001-210-0000-2110 03998 $250.00 1405 11053 3552,11 TEMPORARY BANNER REFUND 1405 :11/26/90 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/05/90 • ###VENDOR TOTAL ##3#: #•;:###•sF###• # •###=,####### •###*###•>t#•?f###*#•; #al•#•?F# •#• •#•;{#=###*#• ###*# $250.00 CYNTRIA-LJILSON a.J Ca.; 37 40 41 42 43 \ 44 4P. 47 4U 03690 001-400-1206-4317 00072 $18.45 TR308 00289 35522 TRAVEL REIMB/OCT 21-24 TR308 12/03/90 DATA PROCESSING /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 12/05/90 .__74## VENDOR TOTAL *****##*******######****#######•*#########aF#####• #*###******;{****# # $18.45 ---R•!!—"XEROX CORPDRATIO 0135 001-400-2201-4305 00418 $58.72 142673026 11243 35523 PAPER CASSETTE/XEROX1012 73026 11/19/90 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/05/90 59 - #Y# VENDOR TOTAL ##*.t?F##•tt#•#**:a####it####at#########?F########-tt•: #####•?t###: #########x#?k### $58.. 72 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS C VERFD THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAG°SLTO L INCLUSIVE�O 1.HE WARRA 'T-REGISTERYOR '//_I14 A I 1 � ARc AC�URAI AND Fl NDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT THEREOF: C° 67.... 40 30 31 52 53 5/ # PAY -CODE TOTAE #**#######• #•; #: #• #•„•#####: ###• # •#######• #• #####*###Y#*# •###x#*###: # _ .__._. *## TOTALWARRANTS**#:F###aF#*#####################x#########################sF####### $154,564.41 BY _ $165,601.63 FINANCE ADMINISTRAT OAT E..._14/6/96 R' 4R 70 71 72 n 74 75'1 76. .s December 03, 1990 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council December 11, 1990 CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS Please consider the following requestfor cancellation of the warrants listed below. #034086 - 7/24/90 - U.S. West Public Safety Group - $1,067.50 Account number 001-400-2101-4201. Stop payment made on warrant which was lost in the mail. #034446 - 8/28/90 - U.S. West Public Safety Group - $22,036.40 - Account Number 001-400-2101-4201 $13,221.84 and 001-400-2201-4201 $8,814.56. Stop payment made on warrant which was lost in the mail. #034809 - 10/1/90 - Griswold's - $173.25 -'Account Number 001-400-2101-4312. Officer Eckert decided to commute to seminar. #034997 - 10/23/90 - CPRS Park Operatons, City of Ontario - $30.00 - Account Number 001-400-4601-4316.. Duplicate warrant issued in error. Never mailed. #035000 - 10/23/90 - David G. Coffey - $4,635.00 - Account Number 001-400-1132-4201. Duplicate warrant issued in error. Never mailed. #035041 - 10/23/90 - County, .-of Los Angeles, Sheriff-`. -s Dept.- - $360.54 - Account Number 0014.00--2101-4313:._ Officers -did: not-- attend ot--attend jail course, too elementary. #035073 - 10/23/90 - Smart & Final Iris Company - $211.83 - Account Number 001-400-2101-4306•. for $72.13, 001-400-2201-4305 for $41.70, 001-400-4601-4308 for $98.00. Warrant damaged in mail. Returned to us & reissued. #035078 - 10/23/90 - South Bay Municipal Court, Citation Bail $871.00 - Account Number 110-300-0000-3302 for $453.00, 110-300-0000-3302 for $418.00. Duplicate warrant issued in error. Never mailed. #035090 - 10/28/90 - Ofcr. Timothy Turek - $168.00 - Account Number 001-400-2101-4313. Check stolen from officer's mail box. #035283 - 11/27/90 - American Public Works Asso. - $149.78 - Account Number 001-400-4101-4316. Error in computer entry. Never mailed. Concur: rl evin Nort`hcra(ft City Manager Gary Brutsc City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact Viki Copeland Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council December 5, 1990 City Council Meeting of December 11, 1990 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of November 1990. Respectfully submitted, /77../2-624-4 Gary Brutsfch City Treasurer NOTED: ?Kevin Northcra City Manager id INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - NOVEMBER 1990 DATE OF INVESTMENT DATE OF MATURITY INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 11/01/90 Withdrawal Investment BALANCE 11/30/90 $3,610,000.00 •<300,000.00> 200,000.00 $3,510,000.00 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 11/01/90 Investment BALANCE 11/30/90 $ 474,928.61 83,053.57 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: Union Federal S&L Investment $ CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment $ U.S. TREASURY BOND: Investment Investment Investment 507,548.80 500,000.00 500,000.00 $ 500,937.94 $ 499,326.42. $1,001,542.12 2/22/90 5/19/88 2/22/89 1/03/90 -3/06/90 2/21/91 5/20/93 1/31/91 12/31/91 2/29/92 8.321% 8.42% 8.10% 9.10% 9.20% 7.71% 8.50% Investment $ 5,00,845.79 3/08/90 2/29/92 8.50% Investment $ 999,492.83 4/20/90 3/31/92 8.763% Investment $1,019,779.01 5/14/90 2/15/93 8.49% Investment $1,023,029.89 9/14/90 6/30/94 8.50% FHLMC: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment $ 248,733.64 3/26/87 3/1/17 8.0% INVESTMENT TOTAL $10,811,236.44 SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 10/01/90 $ 507,548.80 Adjustment <384.52> BALANCE 10/31/90 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO. BALANCE 6/30/90 BALANCE 6/30/90 TRUSTEE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL' 507,164.28 8.625% $ 10,711.04 10,711.04 $ 517,875.32 $11,329,111.76 Respectfully Submitted, Gary Bruts, City Treasurer 7.5% December 3, 1990 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL December 11, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #46903 (C.U.P. CON NO. 88-31) LOCATION: 603 FIRST STREET APPLICANT(S): ISCO DEVELOPERS REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A 11 - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Tract Map #46903 which is con- sistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map, and recom- mends the City Clerk be directed. to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map #46903 at their August 1, 1989 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Tract Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: //. // Michae Seh`ulach Planning Director Kevin B. Nor City Manager T/srfinmap Respectfully submitted, en Robertson Associate Planner ,1d e 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF.' FINAL TRACT MAP #46903 FOR A ELEVEN -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 603 FIRST STREET, HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on December 11, 1990 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of theprovisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 89-57 adop- ted after hearing on August 1, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 8 9 10 12 13. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Vesting Tract Map #46903 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lots 131 and 133 of Walter Ransom Com- pany's Venable Place, as, recorded in Book 9, Page 150, and portions of Lots 41 and 42, Block 78, Second Addition to Her- mosa Beach Tract, as recorded in Book 3, Pages 11 and 12, both of Maps in the Office of the. Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a eleven -unit condominium project on land common- ly known as 603 First Street, Hermosa Beach, California.. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 11th day of December, 1990. ATTEST: T/rsfinmap PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY S 6 November 28, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 11, 1990 SUBJECT: ELIMINATING STATE PREEMPTED CONDITIONS FROM CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.)FOR ROBERT'S LIQUOR STORE LOCATED AT 74 PIER AVENUE INITIATED BY STAFF PURPOSE: TO DELETE CONDITIONS WHICH WERE IMPOSED ON 74 PIER AVENUE, ROBERT'S LIQUOR STORE, BASED ON A RECENT SUPERIOR COURT DECISION WHICH PREEMPTS LOCAL CONTROL OF ISSUES CONSIDERED TO BE WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF STATE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL AGENCY Recommendation Reapprove the attached resolution. Background The City has imposed conditions of approval via a C.U.P. on various liquor establishments. Recently, the Superior Court rendered a decision that the cities jurisdiction over liquor establishments can only be imposed if it is land use related. Robert's Liquor recently obtained a C.U.P. which prohibited the sale of small single containers of liquor under a specified size. This condition has been found tobe preempted. The owner of Robert's Liquor, therefore, refuses to sign the "Acceptance of Conditions" form until this condition is removed. Analysis According to the City Attorney, conditions, which are preempted by the State's Alcoholic Beverage Control laws, can be removed from the resolution approving the C.U.P. (see attached memo)e Staff has therefore removed or ,replaced these conditions with more acceptable conditions. Condition No. 4 requiring employees selling alcohol to be 21 years or older will be removed. Condition No. 6 requiring beer to be sold in 4 or more packs will be replaced with the following: "Individual containers of alcohol of 20 ozs or less shall be packaged in clear bags or containers to make the contents of the container visible." Attachments 1. Revised resolution 2. City Attorney's memo 3. Previous resolution City Manager Respectfully submi ted, Michael Schubach Planning Director t/ccsr74 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (REVISED) RESOLUTION NO. 90-5357 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ON APPEAL FOR 74 PIER AVENUE, ROBERT'S LIQUOR, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 14, BLOCK'12, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 24, 1990 to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The sale of general alcoholic beverages is being conducted in an existing establishment already licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; B. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses; C. Strict compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any 'negative impact resulting from the issuance of the conditional use permit; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit,. to authorize the sale of general alcohol, at 74 Pier Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation shall be limited, tb 8;00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. daily. 2. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 3. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business or in the immediate area. 4. Signs shall be posted conspicuously and prominently at all exits and all check-out stands warning patrons who purchase any and all types of alcoholic beverages that "possession and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages in any public sidewalk, parking lot, beach, and/or any public place is prohibited by law and subject to citation and. fine. The City of Hermosa Beach vigorously enforces its liquor laws" Said signs shall be at least 12",X 14", shall be printed in a 2 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 large type, permanently maintained, and shall be posted in visible locations. A minimum lettering size shall be established by the Planning Director and the Police Department and shall be utilized on the signs. 5. Individual containers of alcohol of 20 ounces or less shall be packaged in clear bags or containers to make the contents of the container visible. 6. An employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. a. All employees shall be given a copy of theconditional use permit and shall acknowledge by signature that the conditional use permit has been read and understood. "7. Adult magazine "R -Rated" shelf shall be located behind the counter, not accessible to minors. 8. There shall be no sale of sexually explicit "X -Rated" magazines, unless a conditional use permit is obtained, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 9. There shall be no sale of sexually explicit "X -Rated" video tapes, unless a conditional use permit is obtained, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 10. Clearly visible signs prohibiting loitering, littering, consumption of alcohol on the premises shall be posted in conspicuous locations. 11. Measures shall be taken to control sidewalk at all times. 12. The exterior of the premises shall and clean manner at all time. 13. The signs on the windows shall comply with the City Sign loitering on the public be maintained in a neat Ordinance. 14. Any violation of the conditions and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be grounds for an immediate revocation hearing and/or citation. 15. The police chief may determine that a continuing police ,problem exists and may require the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel paid by the business. 16. Any changes to the exterior or interior design shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 17. Prior to the conditional use permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the planning department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 18. A conditional use permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted with the planning department. 19. The Planning Commission may review the conditional use permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 20. This resolution supersedes P.C. Resolutions 90-2 and 90-20. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this llth day of December, 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach , California ATTEST: D S TO F00114 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY p/ccrs74 THOMAS W. STOEVER WILLIAM B. BARR CHARLES 5. VOSE CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER ROGER W. SPRINGER EDWARD W. LEE HERIBERTO F. DIAZ JAMES DUFF MURPHY JANICE R. MIYAHIRA LAW OFFICES OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR & VOSE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1000 SUNSET BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 (213) 250-3043 MEMORANDUM TELECOPIER (213) 482-5336 N T .P ? 2 '�9 t, To Michael Schubach, Planning Director City of Hermosa Beach From Date Re Edward W. Lee, Assistant City Attorney November 28, 1990 Conditional Use Permit - Robert's Liquor Your office has requested a legal opinion from us regarding the appropriate procedure for removal of an invalid condition to a Conditional Use Permit. The CUP in question is one approved for Robert's Liquor at 74 Pier. Avenue, Hermosa Beach. The subject CUP provided a condition which prohibited the sale of single cans of beer and/or wine. Subsequent to that grant of the CUP, this office advised the City that a condition prohibiting the sale of single containers of alcohol was preempted by state law and could not be regulated by the City. In order to remove the invalid condition, it is the opinion of this office that this matter can be agendized before the Planning Commission as a "general matter" item. The only action before the Planning Commission would be the approval of the revised Conditional Use Permit for Robert's Liquor which removes the invalid condition. This office is available to answer any questions regarding this matter. EWL:ilf 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i RESOLUTION 9075357 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL` OF' THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ON APPEAL TO INCLUDE A CONDITION TO PROHIBIT THE SALE -OF SINGLE CONTAINERS OF BEER AT 74 PIER AVENUE "ROBERT'S LIQUOR" AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT -14, BLOCK 12, TRACT 4340, HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 24, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an appeal of a Conditional Use Permit amendment which eliminated a. condition to prohibit single containers of beer and wine coolers: A. The sale of general alcoholic beverages is being conducted in an existing establishment already licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control; B. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses; C. Strict compliance with the conditions of approval will mitigate any negative impact resulting from the issuance of the conditional use permit; D. Prohibiting the sale of single containers of beer and wine coolers will alleviate drinking and littering problems on nearby public rights -of -ways and on the public beach; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby appprove a Conditional Use Permit, as amended with a ;condition _prohibiting the sale of single containers. of beer, at 74 Pier Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. daily. 2. The estabishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents, and/or commercial establishments nearby. 3. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent loitering, unruliness, and boisterous activities of the patrons outside the business or in the immediate area. . 4. Alcoholic beverages shall only be sold to individuals over the age of 21 years old, and violations of this condition may result in revocation and /or -a citation. 1 2 4 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i 5. Signs shall be posted conspicuously and prominently at all exits and all check-out stands warning patrons who purchase any and all types of alcoholic beverages that "possession and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages in any public sidewalk, parking lot, beach, and/or any public place is prohibited by law and subject to citation and fine. The City of Hermosa Beach vigorously enforces its liquor laws" Said signs shall be at least 12" X 14", shall be printed in a large type, permanently maintained, and shall be posted in visible locations. A minimum lettering size shall be established by the Planning Director and the Police Department and shall be utilized on the signs. 6. The sale at beer shall be by 'your -pack or six-pack containers, or larger quantity, or by containers of not less than 20 ounces. 7. An employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. a. All employees shall be given a copy of the conditional use permit and shall acknowledge by signature that the conditional use permit has been read and understood. 8. Adult magazine "R -Rated" shelf shall be located behind the. counter, not accessible to minors. 9. There shall be no sale of sexually explicit "X -Rated" magazines, unless a conditional use permit is obtained, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 10. There shall be no sale of sexually explicit "X -Rated" video tapes, unless a conditional use permit is obtained, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. 11. Clearly visible signs prohibiting loitering, littering, consumption of alcohol on the premises shall be posted in conspicuous location. 12. Measures shall be taken to control loitering on the public sidewalk at all times. 13. The exterior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. 14.•The signs on the windows shall comply with the City Sign Ordinance. 15. Any violation ofthe conditions and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code shall be grounds for an immediate revocation hearing and/or citation. 16. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may require the presence of a police approved doorman and/or security personnel paid by the business. 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17. Any changes to the exterior or interior design shall be subject toreview and approval by the Planning Director. 18. Prior to the conditional use permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the planning department, a signed and notarized "Acceptance of Conditions" form. 19. A conditional use permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall`. be submitted with the planning department. 20. The Planning Commission may review the conditional use permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. 21. This resolution supersedes P.C. Resolutions 90-2 and 90-20. ATTEST: PAS:ED, APPRO ' and=DOPTED this 24th da • Apr , 19 ESEN the ?ty Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California APPR A/per.s74 AS4IO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY December 3, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 11, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL HOUSING ELEMENT DOCUMENT REVIEW INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO DISTRIBUTE FINAL HOUSING ELEMENT AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE APPROPRIATE REVISIONS WERE MADE TO THE DOCUMENT Recommendation Receive and file. Background At the October 9, 1990 meeting, City Council adopted the 1989 Housing Element with revisions by a 4-1 vote (Wiemans). At that time, Council requested that the final document be returned for review. Analysis Attached herewith is the Final 1989 Housing Element of the General Plan incorporating the required revisions. Adopted revisions that were made are found in Appendices H and I. Respectfully subm'tted, CONCUR: evin B. Northcaft City Manager ichaeY Schubach Planning Director December 3, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 11, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL HOUSING ELEMENT DOCUMENT REVIEW INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO DISTRIBUTE FINAL HOUSING ELEMENT AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE APPROPRIATE REVISIONS WERE MADE TO THE DOCUMENT Recommendation Receive and file. Background At the October 9, 1990 meeting, City Council adopted the 1989 Housing Element with revisions by a 4-1 vote (Wiemans). At that time, Council requested that the final document be returned for review. Analysis Attached herewith is the Final 1989 Housing Element of the General Plan incorporating the required revisions. Adopted revisions that were made are found in Appendices H and I. CONCUR: Agigre%'<0'..4/ G.� evin B. NorthcDa City Manager Respectfully submitted, t Planning Director / 2"// 9 6 December 3s 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council December 11, 1990 PROJECT TOUCH LEASE AGREEMENT (ROOM C) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council approve the attached agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch to lease Room C in the Community Center. BACKGROUND Project Touch presently leases Room C, 11 and 3 in the Community Center. They have been tenants in the Center since October, 1979. Project Touch is a juvenile diversion program whose, services include social and educational enrichment, counseling, meals, wilderness challenge camping and stepteen/stepfamily groups. They have served the needs of the South Bay Community's high risk youth and their families for over 15 years. ANALYSIS The lease space for Room C is 312 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $240 ($.77 sq. ft.). The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental policy (approved by Council on March 19, 1990) with all other conditions of the former lease remaining the same. Their residency in the Community Center has been of great value in addressing a vital social service function in Hermosa Beach. Respectfully Sub ed, Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Dept. of Community Resources Concur: Mar C f ooney, Director De t. of Community Resources X Kevin B. Northcfaft City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: and Viki Cope , Director Finance Department • lh HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 1st day of January 19 91 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and PROJECT TOUCH (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing on the 1st day of January ,1991 , and ending on the 31st day of December ,19 91 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room C (312 sq. ft.) 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent accord- ing to the following schedule: January 1, 1991 thru June 30, 1991: $.77 per sq. ft. $240 per month. July 1, 1991 thru December 31, 1991: $.80 per sq. ft. $250 per month. Payable on the first day of .the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon. the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions areagreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs orawning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the. Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Any lawful purpose of Project Touch ,and for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in viola- tion of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional . insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include,the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes. intended. In the event the'City at its sole discretion . determines not.to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless, and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di- rect or indirect act or any omission of the lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost', expense and risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that -may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges.levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of. California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Project Touch 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Julie Dorr Feys Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa -Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at -Hermosa Beach on the day .first hereinabove set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor ATTEST: APPR EDS TO F RM: DATE: By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY LESSEE: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council December 3, 1990 City Council Meeting of December 11, 1990 CHRISTMAS TREE RECYCLING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council accept and file this report on the Christmas tree recycling plan agreed upon between Browning-Ferris Industries and The City of Hermosa Beach. BACKGROUND The large number of Christmas trees discarded every year and disposed of in landfills have the potential of being converted into composting material and/or a composting landfill cover. The following analysis describes the current plan between Hermosa Beach and Browning-Ferris Industries. ANALYSIS Browning-Ferris Industries has agreed to provide a separate pick up of Christmas trees for the entire city on the first Saturday following Christmas, December 29, at no extra cost. The trees will be shredded and used as a composting landfill cover at the Puente Hills Landfill. After the December 29 pick up date, residents interested in recycling their trees in this manner can deposit them in a 40 -yard bin provided by Browning-Ferris to be located in the parking lot of the self storage facility next to city hall. Browning-Ferris will also collect trees placed out with residents' regular trash after December 29, but these trees will be disposed of along with the trash. Notices are being posted at Christmas tree lots within the city and residents will be notified of the program via cable TV. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Licz- Ca, ole. Lockhart' Administrative Aide Department of Building & Safety Concur: g''t40L-0: 'Cevin B. North. raft William Grove City Manager Director Department of Building & Safety December 4, 1990 Honorable Mayor. and Members of the City Council 165-i/ 5� City Council Meeting of December 11, 1990 REVIEW OF COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE POLICY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff. that Council receive and file this report. BACKGROUND One of Council's listed objectives is to develop a City Council policy regarding the priority of leases in the Community Center (objective #77). ANALYSIS Per the deed restrictions set:by the Hermosa Beach School District when the City purchased the building in 1978, Community Center Rooms have been leased exclusively by non-profit organizations. Lease rates have been reviewed and approved by Council every three (3) ,years (current rates attached). . Presently there are seven tenants in the Center utilizing 16 rooms (list of tenants, rooms and lease terms attached).. The majority of these tenants (past and present) have been social service agencies such as Project Touch, Easter Seals and the Association of Retarded Citizens. With the exception of the Historical Society, current lessees are paying the full rates. All lease agreements are presented to Council for initial approval and for subsequent renewals. Similarly, any requests or recommendations for exceptions to the established lease rates are brought before Council for review. This approval process insures that City Council does in fact set the policy for Community Center leases by determining the above. To date, there has been no practice that would give any non-profit agency priority over another as a prospective tenant. This has not proven to be a • problem, however, as there is not usually a waiting list for available space. Once approved by Council, the City and tenant enter into a agreement (sample attached) which is signed and reviewed by the City Attorney. Not only do Community Center tenants provide a stable revenue source (FY 1990-91 projection is $84,000) for the City; in many cases they also provide valuable social services which greatly enhance the City's ability to serve the community. �i Other alternatives available to Council include: 1. Direct staff to make changes in current lease structure to reflect a new Council policy. May include criteria for prioritization of prospective tenants by service they provide and/or benefits for residents. 2. Direct staff to reduce number of tenants through attrition in order to make more space available for other City uses. 3. Request more. information. ATTACHMENTS 1. Current lease rates 2. List of tenants, rooms and terms. 3. Sample lease. 4. Deed Restrictions Respectfully Submitted, Mary oney, Director Dept o Community Resources Concur: Kevin B. Norther ft City Manager COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE RATES City Council approved the following lease rates at their March 13, 1990 meeting: July 1, 1990 thru June 30, 1991: $.77 sq. ft. July 1, 1991 thru June 30, 1992: $.80 sq. ft. July 1, 1992 thru.June 30, 1993: $.84 sq. ft. COMMUNITY CENTER LEASES ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS Rooms 1, 2 and 15 (2360 sq. ft.) Leasing since October 1987 Lease expires: September 30, 1992.(five year lease) Monthly payment: $1,817 DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES Room 6B (200 sq. ft.) Leasing since September 1988 Lease expires: June 30, 1991 Monthly payment: $154 EASTER SEALS Rooms 14, 16 and 17 (2,760 sq. ft.) Leasing since September 1978. Lease expires: September 30, 1991 Monthly payment: $2,125 HISTORICAL SOCIETY Room 7 and 6D storage. Leasing since July 1987. Lease expires: March 31, 1991 Monthly payment: 0 HOPE CHAPEL Rooms 5, 6A and 13 (2,212 sq., ft.) Leasing since September 1986. Lease expires: August 31, 1991 (room 5 and 6A) January 31, 1991 (room 13) Monthly payment: $1,703 PROJECT TOUCH Rooms C, 3 and 11 (1,241 sq. ft.) Leasing since October 1979. Lease expires: December 31, 1990 (room C) May 31, 1991 (room 3) June 30, 1991 (room 11) Monthly payment: $956 SOUTH BAY CENTER FOR COUNSELING Room 9 (419 sq. ft.) Leasing since October 1989• Lease expires: September 30, 1992 Monthly payment: $323 - 4- HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the day of 19 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between -the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee 'desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of commencing on the day of ,19 , and ending on the day of ,19 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac cording to the following schedule: Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than.the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of'the following month. 3A. OTHER.CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs shoeing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by- either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the • sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or material- ly changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took, possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any rect or indirect act or any omission of the lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use of said premises. The lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment. that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either.personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hoursafter the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City.. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding.upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: DATE: By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY LESSEE: 8.03 if tis District elects not to c. rect the destruction or damage, the City shall i e the power upon written notice to the escrow holder, to cancel this crow and to terminate.this contract and to recover any and a. amounts pa'. to the escrow holder on the account of the pur iasd price of the proper AR1iCLE 9 FUTURE USE OF PROPERTY .The City agrees and promises that the future use of the property shall be restricted as follows: 9.01 Its use shall be in accordance with governing law. 9.02 Its use shall not be for any purpose" other than parks, recreational, open space, educational, or other ccmmunity purposes. 9.03 'I'lic Grant Deed attached as Exhibit "C" setting. forth the restrictions in Paragraph 9.02 is approved by the City and the District. Beth agree that if the Pier Avenue School should ever revert to the: District or its successor in interest becomes the sole owner of the property, the District or its successor in interest shall be spec:i.fi.cal.ly, bound by provisions set forth in Paragraph 9.02 above and the restric- tions set forth in the Grant Deed. Both the City and the District agree to abide: by and waiveany right that they have which will by implication void the deed restriction referred to above. 9.04 The City and the District agree that in addition to, the Use of the property provided in Paragraphs 9.01, 9.02, and 9.03 the property may be used for other purposes for a period not exceeding three consecutive days at any one time and on the further condition that the city council make a finding that such particular use. is of an advantage to•the citizens of Hermosa Beach, except that the premises may not be committed for the purposes of an ongoing commercial 'enterprise which is - 10 - /' . not a complementary enterprise to a permitted use. 9.05 If there is any dispute that arises as to the use of the property which is not subject to a legal proceeding as provided in Paragraph 10, such conflict shall be submitted to arbitration as provided in the Arbitration Agreement attached as Exhibit "D." ARTICLE 10 RIGHT OF RE-ENTRY •Inde event the City shall ever trade, sell, exchange, or rezone the prb)erty known as the Pier Avenue School as more )articularly described in Exh bit "A", the District or its successor interest shall have the powe to terminate the City's right and possessory interest in and to the Pier Avente School through giving six y days written notice to the City that w thin twenty days afte the date first set forth in the notice that the District shall use to be filed a cause of action(s) to cause the Pier venue Soho . to revert to the District or its•successor in interest, and the version shall become effective upon final order of a court of comae ent jurisdiction. 10.0l The District and th Cit agree that ,,he City's non -rise of all or any portion, of the p operty sh. 1 not be deemed a breach of this Agreement.. 10.02 The rights granted herein are nat intended t� preclude the District or its .uccessor in i.nte•rest from .nforcement of any rights in this Ag cement by any other remedy avai able at law or at equity. ARTICLE 11 RIGHT TO EQUITABLE RELIEF. In the event the District ceases to exist and conso dates or mi•.rges.with any other school district and if the new successor 11 - I FREE R) • • Recording Requested BY; City of Hermosa Beach When Recorded Mail To: u *4 EiVO City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORL,S OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. 01 47 PAst . P.M.MAR 6978 Recorder's Office 1046 ......1r`ONMP(rt 033 PVCL' VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED DOCUMEN ARY TRANSFER TAX $ None Title Insurance and Trust Company SIGNED - PARTY OR AGENT FIRM NAME As instructed by Bank of America FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT of Los Angeles, Grantor, hereby GRANTS , to the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation, Grantee, or its successor in interest, the following described real property in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHES HERETO, AS EXHIBIT A: THE GRANT OF SAID PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION AND SUBJECT TO AN AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE ENTERED INTO BY THE GRANTOR AND THE GRANTEE IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: If the City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation, or its successor in interest, shall ever trade,sell,exchange or otherwise divest the city of title or rezone the property described in this Deed, the Hermosa Beach City School District of Los Angeles, or its successor in interest, shall have the right to terminate the Grantee's interest herein through a legal proceeding filed in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California. THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE AND ACCEPTED UPON THE FOLLOWING EXPRESSED CONDITION, RESTRICTION AND COVENANT WHICH SHALL APPLY TO AND BIND THE LESSEES, GRANTEES, SUCESSORS AND ASSIGNS OF THE PARTIES: The property granted herein shall not be used for any purpose other than for park, recreational,open space, educational or other community purposes. dated: February 28,1978 Hermosa BeachCity School District of LosAngeles County b-41/10WO fll Oid Andrew M. Joyce -District Superintendent 4 , I`i is } �`' n !M!LriTVE - 12 - November 28, 1990 City Council Meeting December 11, 1990 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 90-1052- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER' 19 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. BY ADDING THERETO A PROVISION REGULATING THE PARKING OF TRAILERS, SEMITRAILERS, CAMPER TRAILERS, AND RECREATIONAL TRAILERS." "Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 90-1052, relating to the above subject." At the meeting of November 27, 1990, this ordinance, was introduced by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon None None None Respectfully submitted, Z-ty-ec,7 City Clerk Concur: Kevin B. North aft, City Manager 1 ORDINANCE NO. 90-1052 2 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO 4 A PROVISION REGULATING THE PARKING OF TRAILERS, SEMITRAILERS, CAMPER TRAILERS, AND RECREATIONAL TRAILERS. 5 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES 6 ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 7 SECTION 1. Chapter 19, Article IV, Section 19-75 of the 8 Municipal Code of the City of Hermosa Beach is hereby amended by 9 adding thereto a new subsection (19-75.2) to read as follows: 10 SECTION 19-75.2. PARKING OF TRAILERS, SEMITRAILERS, CAMPER TRAILERS, AND RECREATIONAL 11 TRAILERS. 12 (a) No person shall park any trailer, semitrailer, camper 13 trailer, or recreational trailer upon any highway, street, alley, 14 or public way or upon any public place otherwise ordinarily used 15 for vehicular parking unless the trailer semitrailer, camper 16 trailer, or recreational trailer is at all times, while so parked, 17 attached to a vehicle capable of moving the trailer, semitrailer, 18 camper trailer, or recreational trailer in a normal manner upon 19 the highway, street, alley, or public way. 20 (b) The provisions of this section shall not apply to any 21 trailer, semitrailer, camper trailer, or recreational trailer 22 which is: 23 (1) In the process of being loaded or unloaded, but in 24 no instance for a period that exceeds two (2) hours; 25 (2) Disabled in such a manner and to such an extent that 26 it is impossible to avoid stopping and temporarily leaving, for a // 27 // 1 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 period not to exceed 24 hours, the disabled trailer, semitrailer, camper trailer, or recreational trailer on that portion of the highway, street, alley, or public way or upon any public place otherwise ordinarily used for vehicular parking; (3) Leased or owned by any permitee granted a permit for construction or repair work under any of the provisions of this Code or by a public utility engaged in work for which no such permit is required, or a vehicle leased or owned by any contractor hired by such permitee or public utility, provided the trailer, semitrailer, camper trailer, or recreational trailer is used in connection with such construction or repair work and is parked upon the construction or repair site, or within 150 feet thereof as measured from the limits of the work area as specified in the permit, and only during the period of the actual construction; or (4) Leased or owned by a City department or a contractor or vendor hired by a City department for construction or repair work, or by a subcontractor thereof, provided such trailer, semitrailer, camper trailer, or recreational trailer is used in connection with such construction or repair work and is parked upon the construction or repair site, or within 150 feet thereof as measured from the limits of the work area, and only during the period of the actual construction of repair. (c) A violation of this section shall be an infraction punishable in accordance with the provisions of Section 1-7 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. // // 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. That this ordinance goes into effect thirty days after the date of its adoption. SECTION 3. That prior to the 'expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which time the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS , day of 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California Ai'1iST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _1:14L4.64 Vnie City Attorney // // // P PI • • - 1\$ i'1 .. i'. November 19, 1990 Honorable Chuck Sheldon, Mayor City of Hermosa Beach 1350 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254.3885 Reference: park Pacific Shopping Center (Alpha Beta) 1100 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach, Calif. 90254 This Letter is my formal request to be placed and heard on your City Council agenda which meets December 11, 1990. I am sure by the writing of this letter, you have received Alpha Beta Company's letter dated November 14, 1990 and signed by Tom Gast, Director of Real Estate. His letter spells out the current traffic n at our 1100 Pacific Coast Highway driveway con nd Aviation driveway. _Immediate action to remedy this unsafe ingress and egress must be addressed and corrected forthwith. Sincerely, CC Kathlee Midstokke Roger Creighton Robert Essertier Albert Weimans Tom Gast, Alpha Beta • Alpha Beta • Security Pacific Bank • 1 100 Pacific C oast Highway • Hermosa Beach • California 90254 • (213) 374-3991 P.O.s: Address:� . 7 ".'•i (i':iX AJ rate, •+ .NQVi191990ti- a Ctty Work 4 � city of Flamm ene Far We Savings & Loan • Al st' tate Mailing Box 2$_ . (2 7) re-. , November 1�4, 3.990 ;• , • • The Ncnorabls Chuck Sheldon, •Mayor City of iterznosa Beach x,;350 Valley 'Drive Hertnasa Beach, California 90254-3885 Dear `.MaYor Sheldon: Alpha Beta Store #557 100 Pacific' coast• Hig • away he { ris 'letter ie being .•sent to express ! un concerns frontofourstore regarding tin, 4. his condition that has. developed. Hermosa $eaoh':at the •abovs: re fQrsnca .d;lao#tion, and et ask for your assistance in correcting toe problem' ,9ver�the.:t coursa, of the Xpasst tai; years, traffic f ia has increased igAt4P4on PaCifiC0oA54W°and Aviation Boulevard and ,� �1eTt4, of access:, into omr enter parking lot has been rmdoU.:1.:m0. irea'•04 t•pip �s has suffered considerably whoh ':te.:b'Vs :. d�at r.ssillt of 'the inconvenience the trafftai cx41i"`7ingrees a f,greeeto the center is critical oU o rs `.:,•( and Wo 1d ba customers) are �,, '� .fix'affic on Pac�,fic Coast The . pry .gym et.', , tha..nort ound lHig4w4V4 ing �,. c, 1, . , baPk04. VP in front of our center. iter.westbound, situat ' at' i 4nt� • e�.au �,oies traveling i #i '' 4go sd� tl V� Wh l the a slim red onto n siiation' ' i a !i,4 1iii _tv. . IAy�;atiQ i �Aaki :.A: , ig { ton, °'many ve'hiales fail to make a �Poi�.c .ct�`;ir.Y'*: no. rthbound on pacific Coast ening problem for pedestrians I Hig1 wata . s Q c5�: - P e, i 'safety p HghwY;'' w%h pee a pQt�►t:•a , intersgotion of Pacific Coast i that •ad's 0-040#0497„.��':�ta,�� i= hWa# • tx'1d A.v5at ° ''' ' " . r( t Hig . ., . y !t n at the subject a ..unc .+°. 4 Qn. red. sig We feel,. that Ae g traf f is on Aviation; Boulevard, intersection fac '�, t#� 0. c �, re, cc situation yin front of w' 11 hap a lev ,at4 ' h�� grid6 ,s�� a a in traf f 1 c flow for 1 aur store thereby t' Al :owing nacs1r' g p ingress and egress. tQ"our .center.; j j SinoarelY, 1 . /PA, i Tom Gast Director of Real gstate r •-,- oar 4 O +aH QBE t h cOmPRfY a Am TG:km Councilman, htr , Robert Hssertier, cc: Roger raig Beverly Daug Y ' o er Creighton, Councilman, Dave Hansen, Kathleen Midstokke, I7 g Councilman Mayor Pro Tem, Carol Turner, Albert Weimans, Har. California 90631 • Phone (714) 738-2000 NOV 2 6 1930 Security Pacific National Bank 1100-5 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 November 18, 1990 Honorable Chuck Sheldon City of Hermosa Beach • 1350 Valley Dr. • Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Dear Mayor Sheldon: I wish to express my concern regarding the dangerous traffic condition that exists by our location. I also wish to ask for your assistance to alleviate the problem. As you are probably aware, the area growth: in recent years has brought a significant increase. in traffic on both Pacific Coast Highway and on Aviation Blvd. As a result, ingress and egress to the shopping center in which my branch is located is severely impaired. The problem involves the northbound traffic on ..PCH which backs up from the signal light at Pier Ave. Additionally, vehicles travelling west on Aviation and turning right on PCH further congests the area in front of the shopping center. The result is a blockage of the entrances and exits to the center. I believe that the city should take steps to rectify this situation for both the convenience of patrons to the center and for the safety of all traffic in the area. Perhaps a "no right turn on red" at the westbound terminus of Aviation would reduce the traffic backup on PCH. This would also allow better ingress and egress to the center. I appreciate any consideration you may afford this problem. Sincerely, Jafiet E. Congleto Manager cc Kathleen Midstokke Roger Creighton Robert Essertier Albert Weimans Roger Bacon 1 • ( 4 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council -L7',t,'7* 9.e _5y; December 4, 1990 Regular Meeting of December 11, 1990 (CONTINUED FROM THE SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 MEETING) SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPELLANT: REQUEST: APPEAL OF SUBDIVISION 90-1 588 20TH STREET JOHN M. MILLER 575 20TH STREET. HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO ALLOW A 3 -LOT SUBDIVISION Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the modified request to subdivide the subject property into two lots instead of three lots, by adopting the attached resolution to modify the decision of the Planning Commission. Background The City Council, at their October 9, 1990 meeting, continued the public hearing on the appeal. The Council initially acted to deny the requested three lot subdivision based on findings that the proposed lot widths and lot sizes were not consistent with surrounding lot sizes and that the proposed subdivision would, therefore, be detrimental to the surrounding lot pattern. Subsequent to that decision, however, the Council decided to continue the public hearing to give the applicant the opportunity to return directly to the Council for approval of a two lot subdivision. Please refer to the attached City Council Staff report for further background. Analysis The applicants have modified their original request from subdividing an existing 16,059 square foot lot into three lots, to subdividing said property into two lots of 8,030 square feet each with 60.37 feet of frontage each. The proposed lots easily conform to current zoning and subdivision requirements by significantly exceeding minimum 1"5: requirements. Also the lots are sufficient in size and width to satisfy the criteria for consistency with prevailing lot sizes in the area. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Plan ing Director evin B. Northcraft en Robertson Associate Planner City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. C.C. Staff Report/Minutes for 10/9/90 and 9/25/90 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA MODIFYING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A THREE LOT SUBDIVISION AND, INSTEAD, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21943 FOR A TWO LOT SUBDIVISION AT 588 20TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHWESTERLY 133' BY 120.75 PORTION OF LOT 9, BLOCK 71, SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on September 25, October 9, and December. 11, 1990, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of a request to subdivide said property into three (3) lots and made the following findings: A. The proposed three lot subdivision, although it would create lots meeting the minimum required forty -foot width and four thousand (4,000) square foot size, would result in lots with smallerwidths and smaller sizes than the prevailing lot widths and sizes in the area; B. 787 of the lots in the area have frontages over 50 feet, or. 10 feet in excess of the proposed frontages of the three lot subdivision; C. The average lot size in the area is over 6,000 square feet, or over 600 square feet in excess of the the proposed lots of the three lot subdivision; D. Dividing the subject property into three lots would, therefore, be detrimental to the surrounding lot pattern -en-d. E. The proposed subdivision of two lots, however, will be consistent with surrounding lot patterns and prevailing lot sizes and will in no way be detrimental to the surrounding lot pattern or tend to reduce property values in the area; 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 F. The proposed lots front on a public street; G. The resulting lots will be of a size and configuration consistent with the standards of development specified by the zoning ordinance for the R-1 zone; H. The creation of the proposed two lots is in conformity with the intent and purpose of the City of Hermosa Beach General Plan; I. The tentative parcel map complies with the requirements for approval set forth in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 21943 for a two lot subdivision at 588 Hermosa Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. All existing structures on the property shall be demolished prior to recordation of the final map. 2. The Final Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits unless the Directors of the Planning Department and the Building Department give prior approval. 3. All requirements of the Public Works Department and the Building and Safety Department shall be met. 4. Approval of the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map shall become null and void twenty-four months from the date of approval unless the final map is recorded. The applicant may apply in writing for an extension of time to the Planning Commission prior to the date of expiration. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1990. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APP4 ED S TO F 411/4 li CITY CLERK o CITY ATTORNEY a/pers588 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPELLANT: REQUEST: APPEAL OF SUBDIVISION 90-1 588 20TH STREET JOHN M. MILLER 575 20TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 September 19, 1990 Regular Meeting of September 25, 1990 TO APPEAL THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO ALLOW A 3 -LOT SUBDIVISION Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council sustain the Planning Commission approval of the requested subdivision by adopting the attached resolution. Alternative Approve a modified subdivision for only two lots. Background The Planning Commission, at their August 21, 1990 meeting, approved the subject subdivision based on the finding that the proposed lots conform to zoning and subdivision requirements, and are not smaller than prevailing lot sizes in the area. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission Staff report for further background. Analysis The applicant is requesting to subdivide an existing 16,059 square foot lot into three lots with 40.25 feet of frontage each. The resulting lot sizes would be 5353 square feet each. The proposed lots conform to current zoning and subdivision requirements, as they front on a public street, exceed the minimum width of 40 feet and exceed 4000 square feet. Section 29.5-8 of the Subdivision ordinance also requires a finding that the "size of the proposed lots is not smaller than the prevailing lot size in the area in which they are located." Prevailing lot size means the "most frequent" or the "most common", which is easily determined in an area where all lots are the same or similar sizes. In this area, however, the lots sizes vary significantly. In the attached Planning Commission staff report, staff included an analysis of average lot sizes -- which shows that the average for the Valley area is 5,860 square feet, slightly larger than •'r C C the proposed lots. Please be reminded, however, that "average" is not necessarily "prevailing." Staff has further calculated that of the 140 lots in the Valley area (excluding those 11 unsubdivided lots with over 10,000 square) 37 lots are less than proposed 5353 square feet and 103 lots exceed that size. Closer to the subject property, 11 out of 17 lots along 20th Street are under the proposed size of 5353 square feet, 5 of these lots are 4000 square feet. Given the varying lot sizes and the fact that several lots located nearby have less than the proposed lot sizes, staff believes the Planning Commission decision was appropriate and should be upheld. Otherwise, the interpretation of "prevailing" is subjective enough that a different interpretation could possibly be justified. If the Council is so inclined, staff would recommend that the compromise of a two -lot subdivision be ponsidered. tir1/7//) /K i' RobeTtso Associate Planner CONcURj, Michael Schubach Planning Director (See below) evin B. Northcxaft City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. P.C. Resolution 3. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 8/21/90 4. Site Maps/Exhibits 5. Application 6. Correspondence 7. Public Notice Affidavit a/pcsr588 CITY MANAGER COMMENT: While there are valid reasons to support the. Planning Commission's recommendation, the alternative recommendation - to limit to 2 lots - should be seriously considered, for these reasons - 1) 3 lots only barely meet the City's minimum frontage anywhere in the City. These lots are in an area where some of the larger lots in the City exist. 2) 747 of the "Valley area" lots are larger than those proposed. 3) The current Council can do little to improve on past zoning decisions in already developed areas, but this application represents such an opportunity. Where deficiencies are well recognized, and our density problems are,the current decision opportunity should tend to improve rather than repeat past decisions. Two lots rather than three seems to represent such an improvement. his item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- ci member Midstokke for separate discussion later in e mee ng. Coming forward t, address the Council on this matter was. Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, • estioned r--ults of signal synchronization Action: To re eive and file the repor and to include the following C. ncil suggestions in he City's letter of response to Ca rans: 1) a comment the fact ththeletter received from Caltrans, in wh h Hermos. Beach is requested to restrict parking on the est de of Pacific Coast High- way, arrived after exte i e public hearings on, and approval of, the traffic circulation study; 2) a request for inf• ation on the results of limiting parking on t east s •e of Pacific Coast High- way, and on the acc'oent report ferenced by, Caltrans. Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. o ordered. 2. CONSENT ORDIN CES - None •3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDA FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items' (a) , (f) , (g) , (j) , and (k) were discusse ti a but are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None at this PUBLIC HEARINGS: 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A 3 LOT SUB- DIVISION AT 588 - 20TH STREET. John Miller, appellant. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 19, 1990. Supplemental memorandum from As- sociate Planner Ken Robertson dated October 1, 1990, and supplemental letters from Nancy Connolly and David Pena submitted at 9/25/90 meeting. Supplemental letters from William R. Thomas, 1947 Valley Park Avenue, dated Oc- tober 1, 1990, and from 37 residents of the "Valley Area", dated. October 1, 1990. The public hearing was continued from the meeting of September 25, 1990. Director Schubach presented the staff report and- re- sponded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened. Coming forward to speak in favor of the appeal were: John Miller - .575 Twentieth Street, appellant John Baron - 1948 Valley Park Avenue, presented photographs of::the area Sheila Donahue Miller - 77 Seventeenth Street Minutes 10-09-90 Dave Pena - 1927 Valley Park Avenue Warner Lombardi - 1849 Valley Park Avenue Lisa Miscione - 585 Twentieth Street Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street Vicki Garcia - 1835 Valley Park Avenue Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place Mike Meyers 1104 First Street Coming forward to speak against the appeal were: Glenn Davis - 596 Nineteenth Street Jake Mierop - 1104 Sixth Street Elizabeth Srour - 820 Manhattan Avenue, Manhattan Beach, representing the property owner Betty Ryan - 588 Twentieth Street, the property owner The public hearing was closed for this meeting. Action: To overturn the Planning Commission's approval and .to grant the appeal, thereby denying the requested three lot subdivision of property located at 588 Twenti- eth Street, legally described as a portion of Lot 9, Block 71, second addition to Hermosa Beach Tract; due to the findings of: 1)- 78% of the lots in the area have frontages over 50 feet, or 10 feet in excess of the proposed subdivision; 2) the average -lot size in the area is over 6,000 square feet, or over 600 square feet in excess of the proposed subdivision; 3) therefore the proposed subdivision is detrimen- tal to the surrounding lot pattern, H.B.M.C. Sec- tion 29.5-8(c) Motion Essertier, second Wiemans. AYES: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke,Wiemans NOES: Mayor Sheldon Final Action: To continue the public hearing to the first regular meeting in December, 1990, to allow the property owner to submit, an agreed upon, two lot sub- division directly to the City Council. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. The Meeting The Meeting reconven ssed at 9:27 P.M. 9:39 P.M. 6. THIRD QUARTER GENERAL PLAN A. HOUSING ELEMENT -REVISION, WITH RESOLUTIO TION. -;_,Memorandum from Planning Director Schubach dated October 2, 1990. ADOP- Michael Minutes 10-09-90 approved by the Planning Director directing the cus- tomers and employees to the route approved by the Plan- ning Director which may be used for commuting to and from the property."; 3) on page 3, condition no. 18, section b. insert between "ordinance" and "hall": "or related State law"; 4) on page 4, condition no. 23, add a colon. after Commission on-line 9 and 17, then add a number 1); at the end of 'the paragraph remove the period and add 2. "an independent traffic study to examine motorcycle traffic on local residential streets; to be paid for by the applicant."; 5) on page 4, renumber condition no. 25 to condi- tion no. 26; and 6) add a new condition no. 25 that reads: "The mitigation measures set forth in the applicant's letter (Compass Engineering Company, Inc.) of September 19, 1990, relating to noise, which are not in conflict with the conditions of said resolution, shall be incorporated herein." Motion Mayor Sheldon, second Wiemans. So ordered. 6. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF 3 -UNIT SUB- DIVISION AT 588 - 20TH STREET. John Miller, appellant. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 19, 1990. It was noted that at the time of the property owner's request for a continuance, it was too late to cancel the publication of the legal advertisement. The public hearing was opened. Coming for- ward to speak in favor of the appeal were: Warner Lombardi - 1849 Valley Park Avenue Nancy Connolly - 1927 Valley Park Avenue, who submitted a letter in support of the appeal and a letter in support of the appeal from: Dave Pena - 1927 Valley Park Avenue The item was continued to the Regular Meeting of October 9, 1990, at the request of the property owner. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. REPORT ON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. MERGER PRO- POSAL. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 19, 1990. Director Schubach presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter were: Walt Dougher - of Southern California Edison Company, who spoke in favor of the merger Tom O'Leary - 524 North Guadelupe Avenue, Redondo Beach, in opposition to the merger Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, questioned if proper noticing had been given to Hermosa Beach Minutes 09-25-90 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council December City Council December 11, Public Hearing Reconsideration of Paramedic Fees 1990 Meeting of 1990 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council hear public testimony regarding paramedic response fees prior to reconsidering the fees set on November 13, 1990. Background On November 13, 1990, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 90- 5422 setting fees for paramedic response, among other fees. Fees were based on cost of service calculations presented in a user fee,study performed by David M. Griffith and Associates (DMG). The enabling ordinance was adopted at the meeting of November 27, 1990 and a public hearing set for December 11, 1990 to reconsider paramedic fees. All fee increases will be effective January 1, 1991. Analysis Fees for paramedic response are shown on the attached chart. The adopted fees for transport are 50% of cost for residents and 75% of cost for non-residents. Non -transport fees are free for resi- dent emergencies 50% of cost for resident non -emergencies; 100% of cost for all non-resident responses (emergency or non- emergency). One thing to keep in mind with respect to transport fees is that third party payers (Medicare, Medical, and -private insurance) almost always reimburse for all or a portion of the cost of transport. Medicare reimburses 80% of the lowest of actual cost or prevailing charges in the vicinity. If City costs are not recovered on transport services by charging a fee, insurance com- panies and the federal government are thereby subsidized by the City. Staff identified several options at the November 13, 1990 meeting (see background material) regarding non -transport fees and-recom--- mended that a $50 fee be charged- for all calls; $100- after -sixty days. The City Council revised the recommendation to provide response free of charge to residents for calls of an emergency nature and charge the full cost of $100 for all non-resident calls. The Public Safety Director will determine w calls are "emergencies." The Public Safety Directo that 10% of the non -transport responses would be bi emergencies. Further, since approximately 65% of t responses are resident, 35% non-resident, the same could be applied to non -transport since exact data available. The public hearing was properly noticed by the City fice. Background information is attached - Respons from the Workshop on October 30, 1990, Comparison o Fees (provided by DMG), Local Paramedic Fees (provi and the Fire Department User Fee Summary Sheet as o presented. A resolution amending the original is attached. If Council elects to make amendments, the language can beginning on line 16 of the resolution. Concur: kevin B. Northc :ft City Manager ich resident estimates led as non- ansport ssumption s not Clerk's of - to Questions Paramedic ed by HBFD), iginally the City be inserted, Viki Cope' Finance D and rector Paramedic Response Fees Current Fee Cost Fee gffective 1/01/91 t; Paramedic Response, Transport Resident $ 65 $201 $100 (150 after 60 days) Non -Resident 105 201 150 (200 after 60 days) Paramedic Response, Non -Transport Resident, Emergency None 100 0 Resident, Non -Emergency None 100 50 Non -Resident None 100 100 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 APPROV=D AS TO FO: 28 �, r !� 1 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBER 90-5422, TO CHANGE FEES FOR PARAMEDIC RESPONSE. WHEREAS, On November 13, 1990, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-5422 establishing a master schedule of service charges and fees; and WHEREAS, after hearing public testimony, the City Council has reconsidered paramedic response fees:.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach that: SECTION 1. Schedule 2 of the Fee Schedule for the Fire Department adopted on November -131-199-0 as -- Resolution No. 90-5422 is hereby deleted and a new Schedule 2 shall be appended to the Fee Schedule which said new Schedule shall read as follows: "(insert language following Council action)". SECTION 2. This resolution, following its adoption by the City Council, shall take effect January 1, 1991. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of December 1990. PRESIDENT OF THE.CITY COUNCIL, AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA.BEACH,..CALIFORNIA._ ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY B4cKCRarrND MATER/Al RESPONSE TO CITY COUNCIL QUESTIONS/COMMENTS ON USER FEES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 30, 1990 Comment: FIN/PLN Answer: Question: FI-N/PLN Answer: Comment: BLD Answer: Question: FIN/PS Answer: Noticing for appeals to Council would cost less than 300' noticing fee. Need to consider special fees. Staff agrees and recommends that the 300' noticing fee minus the costs of the contractor ($250) that prepares the noticing list be charged as a noticing fee for 'appeal to City Council. The new fee of $90 allows for the fact that the noticing list has been prepared. The fee is included in the master fee resolution. 300' noticing not currently done inhouse - would have new cost to offset. Impact would be less. Are there other fees where impact -is -overstated? The new cost to have a contractor perform the noticing services will be approximately $26,000 of the total $27,200 impact therefore the City will recover $1,200 in administrative costs if all work is done by contractor. Other fees contained in the user fee study are based on costs being incurred currently, not new costs, therefore no other fee impacts would be overstated. 2.1 Zoning enforcement costs should be better recovered • from violators - civil method used in Los Angeles. A separate report will be presented to City Council at a future meeting: Nori=transport-fee.T Who determines when to charge? DMG will supply chart of other cities fees for comparison. Not charge for -----a- :l? Lss not: incl de readiness costs. There are several -Options that could be used to__ charge for paramedic responsesT,- ry-- charge -for all non-residents and give residents--free:-:service = - using the rationale that res -idents- principally 7pa taxes for us to provide the service, non-residents do1not; 2) charge for all calls that are non -life threatening. The paramedics and the Chief can ATTACHMENT A —3 determine which ones would receive billings after the response is made and the reports are filed; 3) charge for all calls with no exceptions or exemptions; or 4) charge. 50% of cost for all non-resident responses and for resident calls that would be categorized as non -emergency, non -life threatening calls. The Chief and the paramedics would determine which are non -life threatening calls such as those for headaches, broken fingernails, small cuts, drug related problems, helping people into bed and other calls considered to be an abuse and misuse of the emergency medical system; 5) charge $50 for all resident emergency calls, $100 for non-resident and non -emergency resident calls. Staff recommended alternative 3 at the October 30th workshop. Charging less than full cost reduces costs for insurance companies And Medicare, which - seems an unintended benefit. Attached are the comparison charts of paramedic fees provided by DMG and a survey of neighboring cities provided by our paramedic coordinator.- Question: FIN/PS 4. Do we have to provide clearance letter? Cost seems too low. Answer: The City does not have to provide clearance letters.'..it is a courtesy service. The Chief has checked the costs and they seem to be appropriate based on the time and rates for the employees involved. Comment: FIN/PS 5. Sign off tickets - cost seems too high. Answer: The costs calculated should have included only one officer, not two. After discussions with records staff, the Chief has reached the conclusion that it may be in the best interest of the department -:and= the City for public relations to discontinue charging for the sign -offs :__Some-. of -.the ..- surrounding agencies do not -charge _for__=this :ser -vice-_ and the Marshalls provide -the service free— -: The__ _ _ -- City is not required to provide this service, it is a courtesy. Only the Marshalls ._are required to provide the service. The records staf£_feels_that the fee should be discontinued since -the - ----- individuals -individuals now have to pay the fine for citations for registration tags (this was not the case in the past). Many complaints are received about the fee for vehicle inspection. The recommended resolution 9 r FEE OR CHARGE.1 Response Fee (BLS) Response Fee (ALS) Transportation Fee (TILS) la Transportation Fee{ALS) la - Resident (AL -S, BLS) Non -Resident (ALS. BLS) Mecfi-Care Fee Subscription Service (yearly) • ADDI(IIONAL CHARGES lc • Niglatoliday Charge Mileage fee Additional Patient Oxygen Charge Stand-by Charge/15 minutes Wait limo Charge1l5 minutes Code 3 Charge Extra Handling IV I , ; EKG ;, ,,t; Airway (with oxygen) Medical Anti -Shock Trousers da tat Bum Kit MuIIi-Trauma Dressing Decontamination of Unit` Report Copies Incubator . ... Surgical Collar . Fee for Transportation beyond nearest hospital r. VACAVILLE FIRE DEPT ld I 2.00 $250.00 $375.00 MANHATTAN BEACH FIRE DEPT Id $78.00 _ 1125.00 NOTES COMPARISON OF PARAMEDIC FEES CULVER CTTY FIRE DEPT lid s90.00 $150.00 ANAHEIM FIRE DEPT Le $150.00 $250.00 $24.00 BEVERLY FILLS FIRE DEPT $85.40 $85.40 $45.50 $45.50 115.35 $30.60 $12.30 BUR.BANK FIRE DEPT $80.00 $80.00 $12.00 $5.00 $40.00 ' 112.00 $12.00 LONTiG— BEACH FIRE DEPT 1151.00 $151.00 18.50 $28.00 $56.00 - to 11 that is no RESPONSE FEE. thou rho TRANSPORTATION FEE rutfocls the transportation and response chargestogether. 1b } Notts char gas Jur non-subsct thus s only. Also this fate dapa'trni-nt only responds and does not transport. ti Charged her item. p+!r calf. td Charged only if patient is transported • to Reflects charges fir; non -subscribers only. FEE OR CHARGE Response Fee (BLS) Response Fee (ALS) Transportation Fee (BLS) la Transportation Fee (ALS) la ,Residenl (ALS, BLS) Mon -Resident (ALS. BLS) Medi -Care Fee Subscription Service (yearly) • ADDITIONAL CHARGES le • :' NightlFloliday Charge Ieage Fee Additional Patient Oxygen Charge i Stand-by ChargeJ15 *Minutes Wait time Charge/15 minutes ' Code 3 Charge ; '• Extra Handling ' EKG ! ;! ;i Airway (with oxygen) . Medical Anti -Shtick Trousers OB Klt Burn Kit Mull# -Trauma Dressing .,.. Decontamination cairn Report Copies '.; : . Incubator Surgical Collar Fee for Transportation beyond nearest hospital ORANGE FIRE DEPT lb $100.00 $150.00 $24.00 FULLERTO+N FIRE DEPT 1b $75.00 $125.00 $14.00 COMPARISON OF PARAMEDIC FEES r CARLSBAD PIEDMONT' FIRE DEPT FIRE DEPT 1e r $165.00 $165.00 $5.00 $100.00 $10.00 $125.00 $225.00 $337.00 $15.00 PASADENA FIRE DEPT $151.00 $271.50 $2800 r $56.00 ALAMEDA CO TRAUMA CTR SYSTEMS $183.00 $240.00 $30.75 $7.40 $30.25 $21.60 $26.75 $51.00 NOTES to N there is no RESPONSa FEE, than tho TRANSPORTATION FEE rotlocts Iho transportation and rsspor so ch'u os toga t er. lb RRuYuets chargos tut Iloo-subscribors ordy. Also this lire department only responds and does not transport. Ic Chargud pot dom. pot call. 14 Charged only if palwnt istransporlod. to ftolioct :charges fax non-subsrzrhurs only. MERCY PENNINSULA AMBULANCE (S.F.) $212.30 $440.00 $38.50 $8.25 $38.50 $53.75 FEE OR CHARGE Response Fee (BLS) Response Fee (ALS) Transportation Fee(BLS) la Transportation Fee (ALS) la Resident (ALS, BLS) Non -Resident (ALS, BLS) Medi -Care Fee Subscription Service (yearly) '. ADDiT1ONAL CtiARGES•:lc . NighttHoliday Charge Mileage Fee Additional Patient Oxygen Charge Stand-by Charge&¢ minutes rWait time Charge/i5 minutes Code 3 Charge . Extra Handling . IV EKG • Airway (with oxygen) Medical Anti -Shock Trousers OB Kt Burn Klt i • Multi -Trauma Dressing. Decontamination of Unit '. Report Copies i - Incubator Surgical Collar - Fee for Transportation . ., beyond nearest Hospital , n • PROF AMBULANCE SVCS, INC. (LA COUNTY) $156.00 $260.00 $37.25 $6.75 $29.00 $23.00 $58.00 COMPARISON OF PARAMEDIC FEES SACRAMENTO AMBULANCE SERVICE $175.00 $350.00 . $350.00 $40.00 $7.50 $50.00 $30.00 $50.00 $50.00 $45.00 $75.00 $25.00 $15.00 $5.00 $30.00 25 10 HOTES METRO AMBULANCE SERVICE (SACTO) $175.00 $350.00 $40.00 $7.50 $50.00 630.00 $12.50 $45.00 $30.00 $30.00 DOCTOR'S AMBULANCE (MODESTO) $170.00 $365.00 $35.00 $8.00 $30.00 $15.00 $45.00 $54.00 *65.00 $15.00 STOCKTON AREA $170.00 $375.00 $46.06- $13.60 46.00$8.60 $30.00 $46.00 ACME AMBULANCE (AL . AMEDA) $245.00 $50.00 $10.00 $40.00 $50.00 to hi there is no RESPONSE FEE, then itre TFIANSPORTATION FEE iolbds Ifo Uenslxwtatirxr and response charges together_ kr Retorts charges lot non -subscribers only. Also lids fire departrnenl only responds and does not transport. tc Charged per item. par coll. td Clratged only if palionl is uangrarted_ to Refloat; charges lei ren -subscribers only. • CITY OF H ERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO•Director Of Public Safety SUBJECT• .Paramec9j c• Fee DATE• 11-5-90 FROM•Paul _Hawkins, Paramedic Coordinate The 'following is a list of local Cities Paramedic fees. Inglewood Beverly Hills Santa Monica Culver City Transport .^.espouse 100.00 Resident- 100.00 Non -Res. 200.00 Non -Res. N.C. for Res: 100.00 150.00 90.00Resident' 150.00 Non -Res. Gardena 56.00 Torrance N.C. Hawthorne 150.00 Manhattan Beach 75.00 Res. 125.00 Non -Res. El Segundo 120.00 Non -Res. Redondo Beach N.C. 100.00 N.C. N.C. N.C. 75.00 175.00 Advanced Life Support N.C. Fire Deportment 1 MUTUAL AID (FIRE) 2 SUPPR TRAINING 3 FIRE REPT COPIES 4 EARTNOUAKE PREP 5 STATION TOURS 6 =NOM. FIRE SAFE 7. OPEN HOUSE 8 SAFETY LECTURE 9 EMER MED PROBLEM 10 CPR CLASS 8 HOUR 11 CPR CLASS 4 HOUR • 1 13 P/M RESP NON -TRANS 14 P/M STAND-BY 15 •/P SCREENING 16 .PHOTO INSP FIRE/SAFE 17 LOCKOUT (CAR) 18 LOCK -OUT (HOUSE) 19 FLOODING WATER REM 20 SPRAI'ROOTH PERM 21 SPRAY BOOTH INSP 22 PLAN CHECK NEW CONST 23 ALARM SYS PLAN CHECK 24 ALARM SYS INSPECT 25 FIRE PROT SYS EXIST 26 FIRE PROT SYS NEW 27 OPEN FIRE PERMIT 23 SPRINKLER CERT TEST 29 COMM BLD / APT INSP 30 FUMIGATION PERM/INSP A . DESCRIPTION Helping other Cities Fire -fighting Trng Sale of Report copies Trng/Verious groups School/group tours Sfty trng et schools Am Fire Prev Week Sfty telks/Ver grps Emer Sfty grp talks CPR instruction n rensp n eu o No P/M transport Stend-by/Var Events Citizen B/P check Photos Taken et Insp Open Cer/Key stuck Open House/Key stuck Vacuum leaked water Auto paint Bus perm Insp/Prior to permit Fire Dept Plan Review City of Hermosa Beech User Fee Study Summery Sheet UNIT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT VOLUME FEE COST SUBSIDY 11 Insp New Facilities Insp Existing Fec. Insp New Facilities Fire Pits/Park & Home Pressure Test System Am Insp/Re-Insp les Pern/Insp Tents 8.0 S0.00 S75.25 12.0 S0.00 5308.50 28.0 52.50 58.64 4.0 50.00 S258.75 14.0 S0.00 5393.93 2.0 50.00 5166.50 1.0 50.00 53,319.00 8.0 S0.00 5167.88 8.0 50.00 5167.88 2.0 50.00 5943.00 6.0 S0.00 S578.67 502.0 565.00/105.00 5201.10 494.0 50.00 599.67 1.0 50.00 5269,553.00 545.0 50.00 511.42 2.0 50.00 S41.00 170.0 S0.00 559.48 40.0 50.00 S94.65 30.0 50.00 586.50 8.0 S0.00 515.38 8.0 S0.00 5298.13 30.0 50.00 554.23 35.0 50.00 538.09 35.0 S0.00 5298.31 80.0 S0.00 5106.91 20.0 50.00 S596.55 50.0 50.00 $42.62 60.0 S0.00 591.95 925.0 50.00 S126.37 224.0 528.20 542.67 LEGAL FACTORS AUTHORITY CONSIDERED 575.25 5308.50 56.14 Dept Policy S258.75 S393.93 S166.50 S3,319.00 5167.88 5167.88 5943.00 S578.67 5201.10 Dept Policy S99.67 New S269,553.00 511.42 541.00 559.48 New 594.65 " 586.50 S15.38 5298.13 S54.23 538.09 5298.31 S106.91 New S596.55 542.62 New 591.95 New S126.37 514.47 Ord 84-762 u u 0 Cities help us In-house trng 100% of Cost Pub info/ewereness 11 a 11 11. RECOMM FEE ANNUAL FEE INC/DEC (-) IMPACT Note 1 Note 2 Public_Reletions City Use No chg if Emerg Ilo chg/City cause 100% of Cost 11 Bldg Dept Collects 11 Note 4 100% Cost to issue 100% of Cost Note 3 100% of Cost SO SO SO SO S9 S7 SO SO SO S0' SO SO SO SO 50 SO So SO SO SO SO In 5100/150 S35/45 550/100 S50/100 SO SO SO SO SO SO S60 560 595 595 S87 587 S15 S15 S300 5300 SO SO SO SO SO SO -S105 S105 SO SO $43 S43 S92 $92 5175 5175 S43 515' SO SO S182 SO S0 SO SO SO So 50 en 526,606 541.990 SO S0, SO 510,200 53,800 52,610 5120 52,400 SO SO SO S2,100 SO 52,150 55,520 S40,469 53,315 31 HAZ-MAT STORAGE 32 ARSON/FIRE INVEST 33 AUTO REP PERMIT 34 HOOD SYS INSP - NEW '35 CAPTAIN NRLY RATE '36 ENGINEER HRLY RATE '37 FIREMAN HRLY RATE '38 FF/PARA WRIT RATE 39 OTHER NON -FEE TOTALS Haz-Met Storage Fees Investigate Incident New Auto Rep Bus Restaurant Fire Hoods 1.0 1.0 20.0 1.0 465.0 465.0 920.0 930.0 1.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 S1,100.00 $903.00 556.20 $119.00 565.26 $54.92 $41.95 $45.68 $791,444.00 $1,100.00 $903.00 $56.20 $119.00 565.26 $54.92 541.95 $45.68 $791,444.00 New Note 5 - City Use Only 100% of Cost Bldg Dept Collects a n 11 SO $57 SO SO 557 SO SO $1,140 SO $30.70 $1,072,076.04 $1,072,045.34 $1,081 $1,050 $142,602 - Items marked with an asterisk have been excluded from the fee for service Revenue for this fee area is based on an estimated recoverable volume. See REVENUE/COST COMPARISON sheet for more information. totals. 'These hourly rates are calculated for use in 2nd party response calls and DUI accident response calls. They can be broken down into per -minute rates as shown below: Captain per -minute: Engineer per -minute: Fireman per -minute: FF/Para per -minute: to t• 2 to 3 to 4 to S $1.09 $0.92 $0.70 $0.76 - $100 for residents, $150 for Non-residents - if paid within 60 days. Goes to $150/$200 if,paid after 60 days. Based on 50/50 Res/non-res rates and 30% collected within 60 days; 70% collected after 60 days -$50 for all if paid within 60 days. Goes to $100 after 60 days. Based on 30% collected within 60 days; 70% collected after 60 days. - First inspection & 1 re -inspection per year free; $175 each thereafter. Figures based on 25% of total Inspections billable. - First inspection $ 1 re -inspection per year free; $105 each thereafter. Figures based on 25% of total inspections billable. • This fee will cover the costs involved in the inspection of the premises, issuance of the permit, and the costs associated with the administration of the hazardous materials program. Four subcategories will be implemented as follows: 0-500 gallons 0-5,000 pounds 0-2,000 cubic feet $100 annual fee December 4, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 11, 1990 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION, CIP 88-406 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Select the construction contract time for this project as 120 calendar days. 2. Waive the irregularity in Colich & Sons's bid for 120 calendar days thereby saving $12,903, said action being in the best interest of the City. -- 3. Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Colich & Sons (JV) for Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project, CIP 88-406 in the amount of $1,627,996. 4. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within the budget limitations. Background: On September 25, 1990, City Council authorized staff to advertise for construction bids on this project. This project proposes to replace or line approximately 12,285 feet of sanitary sewer. About 1,100 feet of sanitary sewer on Ardmore Avenue (originally included in this project) will be reconstructed as part of the Valley Ardmore street overlay project. In addition, about 700 feet has been deferred until the next project because of right-of-way conflicts. Analysis: The bid package was prepared to allow the contractor to submit lower costs based on their workload and work methods. Each contractor bid on 120, 150 and 180 calendar days to complete all work. The selection of contract time and award of a contract is the City Council's decision. The analysis is divided as follows: 1. The Bids 2. Bid Irregularity 3. The Low Bidders 4. Reference Check 5. Selections of Construction Contract Time 6. Contract Cost and Fiscal Impact 7. Summary 1. THE BIDS The project was advertised and eight sealed bids were received by the City Clerk at 2:00 pm on Thursday November 1, 1990. The bids were then publicly opened and read aloud at that time. The bids and bid summary are available for review in the office of the City Clerk. 120 days 150 days Engineer's Estimate $2,000,000 - Colich & Sons $1,627,996 (1) $1,633,344 Peter C. David 1,640,899 1,620,051 Grbavac & Prkarin 1,836,736 1,806,736 Clarke Contracting Corp 2,018,964 2,008,964 Mike Masanovich 2,174,740 2,139,218 Christeve Corp 2,179,299 2,167;115 John T. Malloy 2,296,830 2,246,830 KEC Company 2,364,332 2,364,332 The low bid amount is highlighted for each time period. (1) corrected amount 180 days $1,587,648 (1) 1,620,051 1,776,736 1,998,964 2,113,870 2,122,747 2,196,830 2,364,332 2. BID IRREGULARITY At the bid opening, Peter C. David was the apparent low bidder for the 120 day project. However, it was noticed at the time that the bids were opened that Colich & Sons (JV) made a mathematical error which was later found to affect the total. The first work day after the bid opening, Colich notified the City of their error. After reviewing theirbid and the job specifications, a determination was made using the unit price as shown which resulted in Colich's corrected bid amount totaling $1,627,996 instead of $1,648,344. The specifications state that "In case of a discrepancy between the item price and the total set forth for the item, the item price shall prevail." The specifications also allow the City Council to waive irregularities when it is in the best interest of the City. Waiving the bid irregularity will result in Colich & Sons as the low bidder for the 120 day project. This action is in the best interest. of the City. 3. THE LOW BIDDERS The apparent low bidder for each time period including the associated monetary impacts from inspection and administration are show on the next page. CIP 88-406 COST COMPARISON FOR THREE CONTRACT TIME PERIODS Low Bidder 120 Days 150 Days 180 Days Colich & Sons Peter C. David Colich & Sons Construction (1) $ 1,627,996 Inspection (2) 56,660 City Admin. (3) 8,160 Total Costs $ 1,620,051 $ 1,587,648 67,960 79,260 10,200 12,240 $ 1,692,816 $ 1,698,211 Comparison to 120 days 1,679,148 $5,395 ($13,668) Construction costs are the low bid for that time period., Inspection costs are based on the proposed cost for BSI Consultants, Inc., the firm recommended by staff. City administrative costs are internal costs associated with staff administrative time. 4. REFERENCE CHECK For each of the two lowest bidders, at least three references were questioned to determine their qualifications. Each contractor has a valid Class A license (General Engineering) issued by the State. No violations have been filed against either bidder. 5. SELECTION OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TIME This project was bid for three different time periods allowing for completion of the work in 120, 150 and 180 calendar days. Staff has compared the total costs for construction, inspection (by contract) and in-house administrative costs for each of these time periods. The three different time periods were used in the bidding to see if there would be a substantial savings, to the City for the longer construction times. Total costs for the 150 day time period would be about $5,000 more than the 120 day time period. Therefore the staff recommends against the 150 day time period and its associated increased costs. The total costs for the 180 day time period its would be about $14,000 less than the 120 day time period. However, considering an additional two months of public inconvenience, two additional months of inspection costs, two additional months of exposure to potential liability and possibly extending construction into the summer tourist season, the staff recommends spending the additional $13,668 to complete the work within the 120 calendar days. 6. CONTRACT COST AND FISCAL IMPACT Contract Cost: Colich & Sons bid Estimated 10% contingency Amount not to exceed $1,627,996 $ 162,800 $1,790,796 Staff will not exceed the amountabove without prior City Council approval. Estimated Cost this fiscal year: Design Services During Construction Construction not to exceed Construction Engineering {Inspection and soil testing) Expended this fiscal year* (as of 11/30/90) .TOTAL * Revenue from sale of plans and specifications Amount budgeted: $1,920,163 Funding Source 6% UUT and Sewer Fund The project total expenditures are estimated to be below the budgeted amount. $ 3,861 $1,790,796 $ 62,320 $ ( 1,088) $1,855,889 7. SUMMARY Colich & Sons (JV) is the apparent lowest cost responsible bidder for the 120 calendar day construction time. The reference check indicated that the firm qualified to do this type of work, finished on schedule, stayed within budget and produced quality work. Award of this contract is consistent with council's goal to improve the City infrastructure. Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Select a different construction contract time period. 2. Reject the low bidder. 3. Rebid the project. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Unavailable for signature Viki Copeland Finance Director pworks/ccsewr Lynn Terry Deputy City Engineer An "•ray Antich Director of Public Works 'Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager PETER C. DAVID CO., INC. PIPE LINE CONTRACTORS PIPE LINE CONTRACTORS November 28, 1990 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Attention: City Council Reference: Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project (CIB -88-406) Gentlemen, License #584275 5 Argonaut, Suite 250 Laguna Hills, California 92656 Telephone: (714) 454-2544 FAX: (714) 454-8029 pr y=' m-17 DEG 4 1990 Peter C. David Co., Inc. hereby contests Colich & Sons bid for the above referenced project submitted to the City of Hermosa Beach on November 1, 1990. The City's bid format is uncomplicated and simplistic, in that only nine bid items are to be, tabulated and extended for three different time periods. There are five arithmatic errors in Colich's bid. The most significant error is the extension of bid item 2 for the 120 day Contract. All evidence suggests that they estimated thefurnishing and installation of 8 -inch sanitary sewer Main at $103.00 per lineal foot. 1) The total cost of bid item 2 is $1,047,922.. This is the exact figure tabulated when using $103.00 (not $101.00) as a unit price. 2) The total bid for the 120 calendar day Contract is $1,648,344. This is the exact figure tabulated when using $1,047,922. as a total cost for bid item 2. 3) Of the eight proposals received for this project, including Colich's original bid, every proposal represented a higher bid amount for the lesser amount of days, i.e., the 120 calendar day Contract is the most expensive and the 180 calendar day Contract is the least expensive. Colich's revised bid for 120 calendar days is lower than their 150 calendar day bid. This is unusual and inconsistent with the other seven proposals which suggests a lack of intent. Colich & Sons have the potential to be awarded'a project for a monetary figure that was not estimated nor submitted. They are the low bidder: by error and due to this are being rewarded for PETER C. DAVID CO., INC. PIPE LINE CONTRACTORS LINE CONTRACTORS November 28, 1990 Page 2 License #584275 5 Argonaut, Suite 250 Laguna Hills, California 92656 Telephone: (714) 454-2544 FAX (714) 454-8029 making a mistake. This is simply not right. Our firm correctly estimated the cost, tabulated the figures, and submitted a legitimate low bid for this project. We therefore contest Colich & Sons bid and request that the City of Hermosa Beach award the Sanitary Sewer Improvement project to Peter C.• -David Co., Inc. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, JJ:lm Enclosures cc: Mr. Lynn Terry Mr. Brian Gengler PETER C. DAVID CO., INC. PIPE LINE CONTRACTORS BID RESULTS 120 C.D. License #584275 5 Argonaut, Suite 250 Laguna Hills, California 92656 Telephone: (714) 454-2544 FAX: (714) 454-8029 150 C.D. 180 C.D. Peter C. David Co., Inc. 1,640,399. 17620,051. 1,620,051 Colich & Sons 1,648,344. 1,633,344. 1,607,996 Prkacin Co. 1,836,736. 1,806,736. 1,776,736 Clarke Contracting Co. 2,018,964. 2,008,964. 1,998,964 Mike Masonovich 2,174,740. 2,139,218. 2,113,870 Christeve Corp. 2,179,299. 2,167,115. 2,122,747 John T. Malloy 2,296,830. 2,246,830. 2,196,830 KEC 2,364,332. 2,364,332. 2,364,332 BID RESULTS (UPON ERROR DISCOVERY) Colich & Sons 1,627,996. 1,631,344. 1,587,648 ** Please note item 3 on cover sheet ** . •.4 • 'f1I•�oa'. • • �1 •♦ Rimmommil 10. • City of 2-lerrnosn Teacly Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 December. 3, 1990 To all bidders on CIP 88-406 Colich & Sons (JV) 547 W. 140th Street Gardena, CA 90248 Gentlemen: This letter is to inform you that the apparent low bidder for each of the time periods bid was as follows: 120 Days Colich & Sons $1,627,996 150 Days Deter C. David $1,620,051 180 Days Colich & Sons $1,587,648 The City Council will select the construction time period and award the construction contract at their meeting on December 11, 1990. If you have any questions, please put them in writing and have them received at City Hall no later than 5:00 p.m., December 10, 1990, (FAX No. 213-372-6186). Sincerely, Lynn Terry Deputy City Engineer -x�. Citi of 2-lermosaTeach.) December 5,'1990 Civic Center, 1315 Valley. Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Peter C. David Co., Inc. 5 Argonaut, Suite 250 Laguna Hills, CA 92656 Attention: Mr. Jim Jackson Construction Manager Reference: Sanitary Sewer Improvements, CIP 88-406 Dear Mr. Jackson: The City has received your letter dated November 28, 1990. In response to the letter, your comments have been referred to the City Attorney for his review. For your information, Note 4., Page P-1 of the Specifications (copy attached) states that "in case of discrepancy between the, item price and the total set forth for the item, the item price shall prevail." Sincerely, ynn Terry Deputy City Engineer CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA BID PROPOSAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 88-406 TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH: In compliance with the annexed notice inviting sealed proposals, the undersigned bidder hereby proposes and agrees to perform the work therein described and to furnish all labor, materials and equipment necessary therefor, in accordance with the Plans and Specifications therefor, and further agrees to enter into a contract therefor, at the following prices: (SEE ATTACHED BID SCHEDULES) Notes Regarding Bid Proposal: 1 All items of work shall be considered complete, in place and no additional compensation shall be granted. All of the work required to provide a complete and operational system shall be considered to be included in the listed tasks and no compensation shall be granted for additional items. Compensation for any item of work required by these contract documents but not specifically described in any bid item shall be included in the bid item most clearly related to said item of work. 2. Bids are required for the entire work. The amount of the bid for comparison purposes will be the total of all items in the base bids. 3. The bidder shall set forth for each item of work, in clearly legible figures, an item price and a total for the item in the respective spaces provided for this purpose. In the case of unit basis items, the amount set forth under the TOTAL column shall be the extension of the item price bid on the basis of the estimate quantity for the item. 4. In case of discrepancy between the dem price and the total set forth for thelem, the item price shall prevail. 5. This is a unit price contract. Except as provided below, each unit price bid by the Contractor shall be binding unless the actual quantity installed for an item of work varies from the quantity shown in the bid schedule by more than 25%, in which case the unit price for that specific item of work may be subject to negotiation as provided herein. 6. Notwithstanding the above, certain bid items are provided for comparative purposes only and, as noted individually, the City reserves the right to reduce or increase the quantity without limit as is consistent with the project scope and the actual field conditions. 0 0.0 Harris & Associates (IP799) 9/22/90 P-1 CIP B8-406 Bid Proposal Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 3, 1990 Regular Meeting of December 11, 1990 AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, TARGET AREA 4, CIP 88-406 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with BSI Consultants, Inc. for contract administration and inspection services. 2. Authorize a not to exceed amount for BSI as -follows: Inspection $ 45,200 Soils Testing 11,460 Contingency 5,660 Not To Exceed Amount $ 62,320 3. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. Background: On September 25, 1990, City Council authorized staff to advertise for contract administration and inspection services pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Improvements,Target Area 4, CIP 88-406. The project provides for the reconstruction of approximately 12,285 feet of sanitary sewer main at various locations. Analysis: The analysis is divided as follows: 1. The Respondents and Their costs 2. Interviews 3. Tentative Choice 4. References 5. Summary 1. The Respondents and Their Costs Seven respondents submitted proposals. All proposals are available for review in the City Clerk's office. A summary of the respondents' proposals are listed as follows: i' b Respondent Cost 1. BSI Consultants, Inc. 2. DGA Consultants, Inc. 3. Willdan Associates, Inc. 4. ASL Consulting Engineers 5. Harris & Associates. 6. James M. Montgomery 7. Bryan A. Stirrat & Assoc. $ 45,200(1) $ 49,500(1) $ 57,600(1) $ 61,236(1) $ 86,410(1) $186,304(1) Non-responsive(2) Total No. of Hours Proposed 820 900 846 934 1,280 2,270 Estimated Cost of Soils Testing $ 11,460 $ 7,400 $ 8,338 (1) This cost does not include soil testing services and is based on 120 calendar days. If a construction time of 150 or 180 days is selected, the inspection costs would increase proportionately, but are not considered in this comparison. (2) A proposal was not submitted. 2. Interviews Five respondents were interviewed by City staff. The proposed inspector who would be observing the construction on a daily basis was at the interview, with one exception, and was also interviewed. The results of the interviews are available for review in the Public Works Department. 3. Tentative Choice Based on the interviews, staff considers all of the five respondents interviewed to be qualified to do the work. The rating of each of the four (4) inspectors did not vary greatly from one firm to another. Referring to the chart in Section 1., BSI, DGA, Willdan and ASL proposed from 820 to 934 hours of inspection and administration for the project. Harris & Associates proposed 1,280 hours. The difference is that the first four respondents proposed one full-time inspector while Harris & Associates proposed one full-time inspector and one half-time inspector/administrator. Thus, Harris & Associates proposed a higher level -of -service than the other four respondents. The question arises, "What level of service best meets the needs of the City?" Staff considers the level -of -service proposed in the range of 820 to 934 hours to be sufficient for the project. BSI, Willdan, ASL and Harris & Associates are all well-qualified to perform the work. BSI is the recommended respondent because they will provide a sufficient level of service, have a qualified inspector and are the lowest cost. 4. References Staff contacted other cities which have used the proposed inspector from BSI for inspection and contract administration services on similar projects. All the cities gave good references. Si Summary Defining the required level -of -service makes the choice clearer. Four of the five respondents interviewed are not substantially different in level -of -service. Therefore, BSI, with the lowest cost, is the recommended respondent. Fiscal Impact: Proposed Inspection Contract $ 45,200 Soils Testing* 11,460 Contingency 5,660 Not To Exceed Amount $ 62,320 * Staff recommends to include soils testing as a part services. Another option is to directly contract out separate soils testing company. This would result in administration costs, roughly equal to the savings of lower cost soils testing company. Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are• of BSI's with a higher using a 1. Award the agreement to another respondent. 2. Delete soils testing from BSI's scope of services. (Staff would have to contract directly with another soils testing company.) Respectfully submitted,. Brian Geng er Assistant Engineer NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Not available for signature Viki Copeland Director of Finance ty/ccsewer Concur: ynn Terry Deputy City Engineer An "ony Anti h Director of *ublic Works evin B. NorthQraft City Manager November 16, 1990 City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Attention: Mr. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works Re: Sanitary Sewer Improvements Capital Improvement Project 88-406 Gentlemen: RECEIVED • ItOV.,.91990 IUBLIC..WORKS, bEPT. On Monday November 5, 1990, I spoke with Brian Gengler by telephone after noticing that a clerical error was made on our bid proposal on both the 120 day schedule and the 180 day schedule. On the 120 day schedule we made'a mathematical error on item #2 in that the unit price of $101.00 was not extended correctly. The accurate total for this item should have bebn $1,027,574.00 making the total for this schedule $1,627,996.00. On the 180 day schedule the same error was made on item #2 and the correct extension should have been listed as $1,007,226.00 changing the total for this schedule to $1,587,648.00. As per the bid proposal page P-1 item 4 "In case of discrepancy between the item price and the total set forth for the item, the item price shall prevail". Therefore, by correcting the total it appears that we are apparent low bidder on the 120 day schedule and the 180 day schedule. We ask that you take this into consideration when recommending this project for award. If you have any comments or questions please contact me at 213/770-2920. Sincerely, John M. Colich JMC/ss COUCH SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1 a Sons547 West 140th Street • Gardena, California 90248 • (213).770.2920 • Fax (213) 329-1532 Honorable.Mayor°and Members of /re -c -//j - December 4, 1990 -//- 96 City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 11, 1990 1989-90 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (Including Report from Independent Auditor) Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council receive. and file the 1989-90 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), which includes the report from Coopers and Lybrand, our independent auditor. Background Annually, the City has a financial audit performed by an indepen- dent certified public accounting firm. The City Council awarded the contract for audit services to Coopers and Lybrand on May 22, 1990 beginning with fiscal year 1989-90. This report is the second year that the more comprehensive report has been prepared in accordance with guidelines provided by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and all applicable accounting standards. Prior to 1988-89, reports were comprised only of combined financial statements; no transmittal letter, individual fund statements or statistical information was in- cluded. The City received the Certificate of Award for Financial Reporting from the state professional finance organization, Cal- ifornia Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) for the first time last year. The award programs require a high level of compliance with governmental standards and inclusion of informa- tion beyond the general purpose financial statements. The pro- grams are not a contest, but a"way of providing greater under- standing, accountability and an improved historical record. The City received feedback from the state and national organizations on the 1988-89 CAFR and all suggestions and comments are incorpo- rated in the 1989-90 report. The CAFR is presented a month ear- lier this year, .and as a Municipal Matter rather than a Consent Item at the suggestion of Councilmember Midstokke. Analysis The auditor's report is on page 1 behind the second divider, Financial Section. The City received an unqualified opinion for. the third time. An unqualified opinion indicates that the audi- tor believes the financial statements present a fair picture of the financial position of the City, as opposed to an qualified opinion, in which the auditor "qualifies" or reserves his opinion for specific reasons, such as lack of fixed asset accounting or significant internal control deficiencies. Only CAFRs with un- qualified opinions are reviewed for award programs. The following analysis deals with the General Fund, which is;the main operating fund of the City. Additional analysis of the'=:;':, governmental funds is included in the Introductory Section. General Fund Revenue Revenue received in the General Fund was 2% over budget and .75% over the estimate contained in the 90-91 budget. Revenue in- creased 12.7% over 1989-90, but the increase is primarily due to the sale of surplus lots. If the sale of property (one-time revenue) is removed from both years, revenue shows an increase of 5% over 1988-89. As shown below: Taxes Licenses and Permits Fines and Forfeitures Use of Money and Property Intergovern- mental/State Intergovern- mental/County General Fund Inc/Dec Percent Percent 1989-90 Over 88-89 Inc/Dec Of Total $5,883,863 $ 499,528 9.28% 64.09% 290,081 (6,727) -2.27% 3.16% 170,056 17,553 11.51% 1.85 508,047 58,225 12.94% 5.53% 860,393 (1,311) -0.15% 9.37% 1,294 (3,706) -74.12% 0.01% Current. Service Charges 371,942 (12,517) -3.26% 4.05% Other Revenue 1,095,517 483,006 78.$6% 11.93% Fund Total $9,181,193 $1,034,051 12.69% 100.00% Property taxes and sales tax comprise almost 50% of General Fund revenue. Secured and unsecured property taxes increased by 21% due primarily to property turnovers resulting in higher assessed values. With the current trends in the real estate market, prop- erty tax revenue will likely increase at a lesser rate. Sales tax receipts are level, with a slight decrease of .15%. Since we do rely on sales tax for almost 20% of our General Fund revenue, we must be sensitive to the fact that any loss of business with- out the same level of tax -generating replacements could necessi- tate budget adjustments on both revenue and appropriations. Interest, which is included in the Use of Money/Property Category increased by 17.60%. With acquisition of property, interest revenue will of course decline. One other notable point regarding revenue is that 8% of the General Fund revenue is received from the state for motor vehicle license fees. The state has been eyeing this revenue during the last two year's budget deliberations and no reduction has yet been enacted. The state did enact fees for property tax ad- ministration and booking, so the city needs to guard against any attempts to reduce the vehicle license fees which are a signifi- cant source of local revenues ($699,370). General Fund Expenditures General Fund expenditures were 6% under budget; 4% under projec- tions contained in the 90-91 budget for 1988-89. During 1989-90, the allocation of insurance charges to each department was implemented. After adjusting for the charges to make the two years comparable, the increase in expenditures over 1988-89 would be approximately 5% as shown below: Expenditures Inc/Dec Percent Percent 1989-90 Over 88-90 Inc/Dec Of Total Legislative $ 352,400 $ 24,924 7.6% 3.75% General Government 2,093,344* (112,733) -5.1% 22.30% Public Safety 3;907,292 179,998 4.8% 41.62% Community Development 481,708 30,412 6.7% 5.13% Culture and Recreation 659,996 92,281 16.3% 7.03% Public Works 876,064 57,153 7.0% .9.33% Sanitation 242,255 (15,664) -6.1% 2.58% Interest/ Principal 319,296 31,348 11.0% , 3.00% Capital Outlay 455,469 137,202 43.1% 4.85% Total $9,387,824 $424,921 4.7% 100.00% *General Government includes employee benefits of $1,380,394. Separately, employee benefits represent 15% of the total;. General Government, 8%. 3 The largest category of expenditure (41.62%), Public Safety, in- creased by 4.8%. The most notable increase in expenditures (43.1%) is in Capital Outlay, which are the capital improvement projects. The citywide sidewalk repair project represented 70% of the General Fund capital improvements. The Culture/Recreation Category increased 16.3%, due primarily to the Parks and Recre- ation Master Plan and renovation and maintenance of Valley Park. General Fund, Fund Balance The fund balance in the General Fund decreased by 8% over 1988-89 due to use of accumulated funds for capital improvements. $403,258 was used from the Designation for Capital Improvement account which is part of the fund balance, for the citywide side- walk repair program, pier repairs and the Community Center fire alarm system. The fund balance is higher, however, than anticipated in the 90/ 91 Budget (as indicated to Council in the monthly reports) by $332,892 due primarily to lower expenditures. --These funds should be put toward capital improvements if the financial picture at Midyear Budget Review looks. good. The Contingency account, which is our "rainy day" fund for emergencies/economic uncertainties is $439,159, but will increase to $629,159 (6% of expenditures) as soon as the loan to the Asset Forfeiture Fund is repaid. Summary The City managed to reserve General Fund monies for open space acquisition ($700,000) and contribute $455,469 for capital im- provements, while maintaining a reasonable reserve for contingen- cies. It is important to continue to maintain or increase this cushion, particularly with the instability of the economy. Midyear Budget Review, which provides the next major review of our financial picture, is just around the corner - set early this year for February 12, 1991. Nancy Shelmon, the partner from Coopers and Lybrand in charge of our audit, will be present at the meeting. Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Viki Copeland Finance Director SEE CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ON NEXT PAGE -4- City Manager Comments Readers are invited.,.to review the.,,; narrative regarding City • activities in the Major Initiative section of the audit booklet. This audit is in the highest category of comprehensiveness of any in the country. It reflects our continuing "bare bones" approach to meet the City's top goal to improve the financial picture. The tight fiscal restraints are service obstacles, but the resulting expenditures below appropriations continue to en- hance our developing fiscal stability. 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended June 30, 1990 PROPOSED BY THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA FINANCE DEPARTMENT VIKI L. COPELAND, FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION Page LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL vi CERTIFICATE OF AWARD FOR OUTSTANDING FINANCIAL REPORTING xvii ORGANIZATION CHART. xviii PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA FINANCIAL SECTION REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS COMBINED BALANCE SHEET ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES — BUDGET AND ACTUAL ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS COMBINING, INDIVIDUAL FUND AND ACCOUNT GROUP STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES' GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET 34 xix 1 9 10 33 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,' CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS - CONTINUED COMBINING, INDIVIDUAL FUND AND ACCOUNT GROUP STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES - CONTINUED GENERAL FUND, CONTINUED COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES Page 35 STATEMENT. OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES:- BUDGET AND ACTUAL 36 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 37 COMBINING BALANCE SHEET 38 COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES 40. COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL •42 ENTERPRISE FUNDS 55 COMBINING BALANCE SHEET 56 COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS 57 COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 58 PARKING FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET 59 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNING 60 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 61 iii CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS - CONTINUED COMBINING, INDIVIDUAL FUND AND. ACCOUNT GROUP STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES - CONTINUED TRANSIT FUND Page COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET 62 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS COMPARATIVE STATEMENT, OF CASH FLOWS INTERNAL SERVICE FUND - SELF-INSURANCE FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FIDUCIARY FUND - AGENCY FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES GENERAL FIXED ASSET ACCOUNT GROUP.' COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY SOURCE 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 SCHEDULE OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ' BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY 74 SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT ACCOUNT GROUP 75 76 SCHEDULE OF GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT 77 -34 iv CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS - CONTINUED Page STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) 78 GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE Last Ten Fiscal Years 79 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION - Last Ten Fiscal Years 80 ASSESSED AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY - Last Ten Fiscal Years 81 PROPERTY TAX RATES AND TAX LEVIES - ALL OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS - Last Ten Fiscal Years 82 PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS - Last Ten Fiscal Years 83 COMPUTATION OF LEGAL DEBT MARGIN 84 STATEMENT OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT 85 DEMOGRAPHIC STATISTICS - Last Ten Fiscal Years 86 CONSTRUCTION VALUE AND BANK DEPOSITS Last Ten Fiscal Years 87 INSURANCE COVERAGE 88 PRINCIPAL TAXPAYERS 90 MAJOR EMPLOYERS 91 TAXABLE SALES BY CATEGORY - Calendar Years 1980-1989 92 MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICS 93 A Cityof 21ermosa 1ieacL October 30, 1990 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Hermosa Beach, California I am pleased to submit the Comprehensive Annual Financ'ial Report for the City of Hermosa Beach ("City"). The report covers the period July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990. Responsibility for the accuracy and the fairness of presentation, including all dis- closures, rests with the City. We believe the data, as presented, is accurate in all material aspects; that it is presented in a manner designed to set forth the financial position and results of operations of the City as measured by the financial activity of its various funds; and that all disclosures necessary for the reader's maximum understanding of the City's financial affairs are included. The report has been prepared. following the guidelines recommended by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA). The GFOA and the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers both have award programs for reports that substantially conform to high standards of reporting set by various standard-setting bodies. In accordance with these standards, the report contains three distinct sections: 1. Introductory Section - letter of transmittal, listing of principal officers, organization chart. 2. Financial Section - general purpose financial statements, combining and individual fund and account group statements and schedules. 3. Statistical Section - a variety of financial, physical, economic and social data presenting trends and other information intended to provide users with a broader understanding of the City. The Reporting Entity The City of Hermosa Beach is a general law city which was incorporated on January 14, 1907. The City operates under the Council -City Manager form of government. Hermosa Beach offers a full range of municipal services including police and fire protection, planning and zoning, recreation and parks, maintenance of public works, enforcement of building codes, parking and animal control, public improvements and general administrative services. vi Financial information for the Vehicle Parking District, Hermosa Beach Parking Authority, and the Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts are included in the City's financial statements as required by, governmental, accounting standards. Councilmembers serve, in a separate session, as the46verning board for the Parking' Authority. •The Lighting and Crossing Guard Districts were created as separate assessment districts pursuant to Street and Highway Code 22500-22679 and Government Code 55530-70, respectively for these specific purposes. • Economic Condition and Outlook -The City of Hermosa Beach is basically a bedroom community with a stable population that has increased less than .5% per year for the past three years. However, being a beach city, Hermosa does experience a high visitor population and the associated costs, particularly in the summer. The City's revenue base is largely dependent on property taxes (30% of, General Fund revenue) and sales tax C19% of General Fund Revenue). Since the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, which limited property taxes countywide, local control over. the increase in these taxes has virtually been eliminated. The City Council does, however, retain a certain amount of discretion relating to sales=tax receipts through policy setting. `The. financial condition of the City has improved over the past few years. The General Fund balance as of June 1990 was, $2,46.0,406, as compared to $21,235 as of June 1985. The City's•"designation for contingencies" account, which serves as a hedge against economic uncertainties, will be approximately 6% of General Fund. expenditures after repayment of a loan to the Asset/Forfeiture Fund. The Asset Forfeiture Fund obtains assets through forfeitures and seizures relating primarily to narcotics arrests. The lengthy process involved in receiving these funds often results.in temporary cash flow problems that necessitate loans. The assessed valuation for the City overall rose 13% over 1988-89; residential building permit valuations increased by 11%. The real estate market has slowed, however, as evidenced by a 34% decline in the number of property transfers over 1988-89. Sales - tax revenue, also signalling the slowing of the economy, remained almost flat, with a slight decline of .15%. Another factor affecting the City's outlook for the future is the use of local funds by the state and federal governments to balance their budgets, thereby lessening local control. It is important for all local governments to work toward preventing this practice. The current economic outlook makes maintaining the present financial condition of the City a challenge, not to mention improving the financial condition. Efforts toward providing funds for deferred maintenance and capital needs must continue. • Since the delicate balance between available resources and the level and quality of service is easily tipped, a heightened sense of: awareness and constant attention to the City's financial position is paramount. Major Initiatives Annually, the City Council establishes prioritized goals for the City. Some of the most significant activities in progress or com- pleted are listed below, grouped according to functional activity. Public Safety The City Manager, department heads and disaster preparedness coordinators participated in•a county -wide disaster preparedness drill which simulated the major catastrophe of an earthquake. The drill allows evaluation of the City's ability to respond in such a circumstance and provides an opportunity for improvement in the 'City's plan and level of preparedness. A fire flow study, prepared by a consultant, was presented to City Council with various recommendations'for upgrading the fire flow system. Improvements to date have resulted in an 85% improvement in available fire flows in the northern part of the City, where improvement was most needed. The City purchased a new paramedic/rescue ambulance and a new triple combination pumper. Public Works The City received $446,000 in Transportation Development Act Article 3 Funds from the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission for projects to extend the Hermosa Beach Bike Path and reconstruct the Strand Walkway and retaining wall. The projects will begin in 1990-91. A study of the City's park irrigation systems inventoried the systems and identified needs of $200,000, which have been incorporated into the Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan. Repairs of structural damage sustained by a 1988 storm to Hermosa Beach Pier piles and pilecaps-were.completed. The City will receive reimbursement of approximately $180,000 from the federal and state governments. A Citywide sidewalk repair program began in February 1990 and is • expected to be complete by July 1990. The project included 43,000 square feet of sidewalks and 3,500 feet of curb. viii In 1984, consultants identified the City's highest priority sewer needs. The design for the final phase of the priority work is finished, with project completion expected in 1991. City staff is now prioritizing current sewer needs. The City Council evaluated several financing options to accelerate future repairs and will make a decision when the staff prioritization is complete. The City entered into a formal public works mutual aid agreement with Los Angeles County and all other cities in Los Angeles County. The agreement establishes a support and communication system among agencies in the event of a major catastrophe such as an earthquake. A report was prepared using a pavement management system to establish street rehabilitation priorities for the next five. years. The goal of the planned work is to not only maintain the current condition of the City streets, but to actually improve the overall condition. — Community Development The draft housing element revision of the General Plan, as mandated by state law, was completed and includes a comprehensive policy section regarding future housing standards. Adoption of the element will follow in 1990-91. The Circulation, Transportation and Parking Element was also completed and adopted. Unreinforced masonry buildings within the City that may be hazardous during an earthquake have been identified and a mitigation program developed. The environmental impact report for voter approved oil drilling on City property was certified. Control over the sale and use of alcohol improved with the processing of conditional use permits for establishments existing prior to the requirement. General Government The City is conducting a user fee study with the help of a consultant to ensure that costs are recovered through user fees or service charges from individuals who directly benefit from such special services. The report will be issued in October 1990. A five-year master plan outlining the City's data processing needs was prepared. Implementation begins in 1990-91. A consultant performed a compliancereview and analysis of the City's cable television franchise to assess compliance with both the franchise and federal regulations and evaluated technical standards and service to the community. Recommendations in the report will be implemented by the franchisee to improve community service. ix The City entered into reciprocal data processing back-up agreements with another public agency and a private company to ensure continuation of operations in the event of emergency. Culture/Leisure The City completed the acquisition of the major portion (80%)";of 19.5 acres of open space land from the Santa Fe Railway Company. The purchase was partially financed through the Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority. Air conditioning for the Community Theatre was installed, enabling year round use of the facility for a variety of cultural/community events. Fundraising efforts by community volunteers, the Community Center Foundation, raised $25,000 toward the project. A Master Plan for Parks and Recreation was completed which serves as a guide for the orderly development of parks and recreation facilities and programs for the next 10 years. Proprietary Operations The Municipal Area Express (MAX), a joint commuter bus line serving the South Bay Cities became operational. Three lines provide transportation to the El Segundo Employment Area, which employs approximately 43,000 citizens of the South Bay cities. A separate Vehicle Parking District Board was appointed to transfer management of the downtown district to the business community. For The Future The City adopted the first two-year operating budget for 1990-92 as a timesaving device and to enable a longer look at resources and planned expenditures. The City's second 5 -year Capital Improvement budget was also approved. Discussions with the Hermosa Beach City School District regarding the City's purchase of two surplus school sites continued, with both sides favoring the transactions as soon as an agreement is reached. The City narrowed consideration of alternate sites for a new City yard to two possible sites within the City. The relocation is necessary due to a voter -approved oil drilling site to be located at the present City yard. Valuable City -owned property known as the "Biltmore site" was rezoned residential by the Council and will go before the Coastal Commission for approval, unless a citizen's initiative requires otherwise. The Council's intent is to sell the 8/10 of an acre site for $8-$10 million in order to purchase several acres of open space in other areas of the City. Citation issuance will be automated through the purchase of hand-held citation writers which will increase efficiency, improve the quality of information and reduce errors. Additional steps will be taken toward compliance with the Air Quality Management District's (AQMD) 'Regulation 15, which mandates air pollution control measures. The City will offer incentives to encourage employees to utilize alternative modes of transportation. The City's alternative work schedules have already moved the City much closer to compliance. A request for proposals for curbside recycling will be issued, with program implementation in 1990-91. Accounting System and Budgetary Control All governmental funds and the agency fund are maintained on a modified accrual basis of accounting, with revenues recognized when measurable/available and expenditures recognized when incurred. Proprietary funds are accounted for on an accrual basis of accounting, with revenues recognized when earned and expenses _ recognized when incurred. Internal controls, an integral part of the accounting system, are the methods and procedures used to safeguard and maintain accountability over assets and other resources, and to ensure that transactions are recorded properly to allow for reliable presentation. in financial reports. The City Council adopts the annual budget by June 30th of each year as required by the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code. The City Manager may transfer budgeted amounts between the departments within each fund; however, transfers between funds require City - Council approval. Revenue and expenditure reports showing budget to actual comparisons are distributed monthly to the City Council and all department heads. The City conducts a formal midyear budget review annually in February. An encumbrance system is used to record obligations prior to payment as an aid in controlling expenditures. xi General Government Functions Revenue The following schedule presents a summary of General Fund and Special Revenue Funds for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1990,`and the amount and percentage of increases and decreases in relatioh. to prior year revenues. REVENUES All Taxes Licenses & Permits Fines, Forfeitures Use of Money, Property Intergovernmental Revenues Charges for Services Miscellaneous Interest FY 89-90 AMOUNT $8,348,899 290,080 226,524 262,132 1,948,182 405,890 1,497,299 835,981 PERCENT. OF TOTAL 60.43% 2.10 1.64 1.90 14.10 2.94 10.84- 6.05 INCREASE % OF (DECREASE) INC. FROM FY 88-89 DEC. $492,969 (6,728) 61,385 21,424 523,567 (30,810) 537,642 202,784 6.3% (2.3) 37.2 8.9 36.8 (7.1) 56.0 32.0 TOTAL $13,814,987 100.00% $1,802,233 15.0% Revenue for the General and Special Revenue Funds increased 15% over 1988-89. The tax category, representing 60.43% of total revenue, increased 6.3%. Intergovernmental revenues comprise 14% of total revenue and increased by 36.8% due to State Transportation Development'Act funds for the Bikepath and Strand Walkway projects. The other notable increase (56%) is in the miscellaneous category. One-time revenues were received from the sale of city -owned surplus property. The revenue was earmarked for open space acquisition. 'Expenditures The following schedule presents General and Special Revenue Fund expenditures for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1990 and the percentage of increases and decreases in relation to the prior year expenditures. xii EXPENDITURES FY 89-90 AMOUNT INCREASE % OF PERCENT (DECREASE) INC. OF TOTAL FROM FY 88-89 DEC. CURRENT: Legislative & Legal $360,600 1.95% General Government 2,118,585 11.45 Public Safety 4,869,166 26.31 Housing & Community Development 585,025 3.16 Cultural & Leisure ` Services 685,447 3.70 Public. Works 1,426,593 7.71 Sanitation 298,382 1.61 DEBT SERVICE: •Interest Principal Capital Outlay 59,281 267,498 7,838,617 .31 1.45 42.35_ TOTAL $18,509,194 100.00% $33,124 (87,492) 981,560 10.1% (4.0) 25.2 133,729 29.6 117,732 171,354 40,463 (98,486) 128,337 6,344,040 $7,764,361 20.7 13.7 15.7 (62.4) 92.2 424.5 72.3% Expenditure levels in the General and Special Revenue Funds increased 72.3% overall. The capital outlay and principal categories increased greatly, reflecting the certificate of participation issue for $5,000,000 and cash outlays required to purchase 19.5 acres of railroad right-of-way property for open space use. Without the major property acquisition, expenditures would have increased by 16.-0%. The Public Safety function, as would be expected, is the next highest area. of expenditure at. 26.3% of total. expenditures., -Included are major improvements in the fire flow system. .General Government, which includes all of the administrative offices, employee benefits and retirement costs for the General Fund, represents 11.45% of the total. Proprietary Operations Proprietary funds include both Enterprise funds and Internal Service funds. Proprietary funds account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to business enterprises. The Parking Fund and Transit Fund are Enterprise funds. -The Insurance Fund, an Internal Service. fund, accounts for insurance costs which are reimbursed by user departments. Parking Fund All parking lot, -meter and fine revenue is deposited to the Parking Fund in order to finance parking operations and capital improvements. In accordance with the municipal code, any excess funds are transferred to the General Fund at the end of the year. Revenue remained -constant for 1989-90, while operating expenses increased 28.3%, due mainly to addition of a Field Supervisor and a General Services officer. The only funds remaining in the Parking Fund"at year-end are amounts related to fixed assets reserved for'capital outlay. Transit Fund Transit revenue consists primarily of Proposition A funds (the 1/2 cent sales tax for Los Angeles County transportation purposes). The City currently operates a Dial -a -ride program with the City of Redondo Beach, subsidizes bus passes for senior citizens and. students, and operates a commuter bus to the El Segundo Empioyment Center (an area of high employment population) with six other: South Bay cities. The Transit Fund shows net income of $71,246 for 1989-90. It is expected that in the future, however, most available funds will be expended when the commuter bus program is fully operational. Insurance Fund The Insurance Internal.Service Fund was created to account for costs associated with the City's insurances: liability, workers' compensation, unemployment, Medicare, auto, property and officials' bonds. Formulas have been developed to distribute these costs to the operating departments in the form of a service charge.. The formulas are designed to capture each department's fair share of costs. The fund ended the year with total fund equity of $243,968. Fiduciary Operations The City offers two deferred compensation plans for employees, which are accounted for in 'an agency fund. The balance in the fund increased by $78,255, largely due to an increase in participants and contributions. Debt Administration The City has no debt applicable to the legal debt limit (as shown in the Computation of Legal Debt Margin, Statistical Section);. however, descriptions and information regarding long-term debt are found in the notes to the financial statements. Cash Management The City Treasurer invests temporarily idle funds in accordance with the State Government Code. The City's formal investment policy, uses an even more cautious investment placement criteria as authored by the Treasurer and approved by the Council, and places a minimum 5% net asset value requirement on any institutions before qualifying for certificate of deposit investment consideration. xiv This policy promulgates that, where collateral is required, only government securities are accepted. Additionally, investment instruments'are limited to U.S. Treasury notes, certificates of deposit, corporate notes and the State and'County investment fund. Shown'below are the percentage of idle funds in each instrument category. U.S. Securities Certificates of Deposit Corporate Notes Local Agency Investment Fund Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Los Angeles. County Pooled Investment. Fund 48% 13% 4% 29% 2% 4% The total amount of interest earned for 1989/90 was $905,842 with an average interest rate of 8.5%. The average length of maturity on investments held this fiscal year was 685 days. Risk Management The City obtains its excess liability insurance through the` Independent Cities Risk Management Authority '(ICRMA), a joint powers authority of medium-sized California municipalities. The City has a self-insured retention level of $100,000 with coverage to $10 million. The cost of the insurance depends on both the loss experience of the member cities and the loss experience of Hermosa Beach. All losses are reviewed and investigated by the Risk Manager. Claims defense and settlement are coordinated with the City's third party administrator. The City also purchases insurance to protect against catastrophic workers' compensation losses and contracts with a professional administrator to process claim payments and coordinate recovery efforts when the injury was the result of third party negligence. Independent Audit Annually, the City has an audit of its financial records by independent certified public accountants selected by the City Council. The auditor's report is included within this report. Certificate Of Award For Outstanding Financial Reporting The California Society of Municipal Finance Officers awarded a Certificate of Award for Outstanding Financial Reporting to the City of Hermosa Beach for its CAFR for fiscal year ended June 30, 1989 is enclosed. The certificate is issued in recognition of meeting professional standards and criteria in reporting which reflects a high level of quality in the annual financial statements. xv Acknowledgments I would like to express my appreciation to the staff of the Finance Department, the City Manager, all department heads and their staff members and our auditors, Coopers & Lybrand, for their assistance with the contents of this report. I would also like to thank the City Council, City Treasurer and City Clerk for their support and their continuing service and leadership to the community. Respectfully submitted, Viki Copeland Finance Director xvi Y. CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS DEDICATED TO THE PROFESSIONAL ADVANCEMENT OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE ADMINISTRATION Certijfcate of sward FOR OUTSTANDING FINANCIAL REPORTING PRESENTED TO THE CitqofJlermo5a L&ack This certificate is issued in recognition of meeting professional standards and criteria in reporting which reflect a high level of quality in the annual financial statements and in the underlying accounting system from which the reports were prepared for the fiscal year X988-19139 Chair, Professional andar$s Committee City of Hermosa Beach Organizational Chart Electorate 7 City Clerk J r City Council J City Treasurer CoataaissioR Cisal BerriFe Board Board of Aweak 1 [Puts & Hee Advisory Coma_!_al City Prosecitor City Maar City Attoratey Community Resources1 T Park and Recreation facilities Marian ent Cultural/Recreational/ Athletic Programmrrig Special Events General Services Parking Enforcement Animal Control Crossing Guard Coordination Meter Maintenarre Data Process Cable T.V Liaision Planning l Current Planning Advanced Planning Environmental Assessment C U.P Enforcement Trarisportation Program Public lWorks _EnA1,2eer Capitalimproyement Maintenance Traffic Engineering IL Public Safety J [rsonnel/Ri*k Mgt. Police Enforcement Investigation Detention Ettr rgenc_EDas_atch Reserves Record Bureau Special Investigation Fire Fire Suooression Prevention Phi' Public Education Personnel Administration Train Labor Relations Finance Budget Accounting Payroll Citation Payment Proassmg Building & Safety Business License PlanChecking Field Inspection Code Enforcement Refuse Contractor Liaison 4 PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA June 30, 1990 Elected and Administia£ive Officials Roger Creighton Chuck Sheldon Robert Essertier Kathleen Midstokke Albert Wiemans Gary Brutsch Elaine Doerfling Kevin B. Northcraft Anthony Antich Robert A. Blackwood Viki Copeland William Grove Mary Rooney Leroy Staten Michael Schubach Steve Wisniewski City Council Other Elected Officials Mayor Mayor Pro Tempore Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember City Treasurer City Clerk Administrative Officials City Manager Public, Works Director Personnel Director/ Risk Manager Finance Director Director of Building and Safety Community Resources Director Acting General Services Director Planning Director Public Safety Director xix Coopers certified petilic;auaaunttrntiy; REPORT OF INDEPENDENT Ancommummu Honorable Mayor and Members of the City C"aamcitlt. City of Hermosa Beach, California We have audited the accompanying genera]., guirlcasE fiirnx: ^sial statements of the City of Hermosa Beach„ Il.i+c+�rii�� a cod Jnu�ae 30, 1990 and for the year then ended as lisp+. itrnr-, t%Ii~+A contents. These general purpose f inancfa t S3tt;altfem nttss arre the responsibility of the City. of Hermosa Bi r, tk1, Ca1i.iif;coyrati. • management. . Our responsibility is to e4nfessi ate, c ,itadiro .i (nn these general purpose financial statements bassAl ©:rnr-ane a tint;., We conducted our audit in accordance with gjerremaIIIV ated auditing standards. Those standards reggii3.rm t1bTtt wwi R)Ilari and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assuurarmE adyruntt. wthet; ° the• general purpose 'financial statements arE fire ;3 0 m tbExilall -misstatement. An audit includes examinfmJr, am +. tes3th klia~ si%.s„ evidence supporting the amounts and disraomri¢. :ray tem amErral. purpose financial statements. - An audit aids. iinramilEs3 a ;szEss g the accounting principles used and .sig.nilifiimantit, e iimath mt aE by management, as well as evaluating the o;rtaz1:1 gjErnercall. gAIZLIOIDZE financial statement presentation. We bElLitem. ittiaatt. rum aata sit provides a reasonable basis for our opirriican., In our opinion, the general .purpose mtaitterrramtx, rrefer.n ed to above present fairly, in all materials the. if im©al position of the City of Hermosa Beach,. L;a ifr'a rx 'am col. amine 30,,, 1990, and the results of its operations ardi albausp.373 nm sts- ( sin •flows of its proprietary fund types for i .,a tiJ in smiled dim conformity with generally accepted accointtitu a1 trims :i lte .„ Our audit was made for the purpose' of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The combining and individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules listed in the table of contents are presented for purposes of-additional"analysis and are not a required part of the general purpose financial statements of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The other data included in this comprehensive annual financial report, designated as "Statistical Section" in the Table of Contents, have not been audited by use and, accordingly, we express no opinion on such data. Los Angeles, California September 20, 1990 GENERAL FUND The General Fund accounts for all revenues and expenditures used to finance the traditional services associated with a municipal government which are not accounted for in other funds. In Hermosa Beach these services .include general government, public safety, community development, culture and recreation, public works, and sanitation. r. 3 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET - GENERAL FUND June 30, 1990' And 1989 ASSETS Cash and investments Interest receivable on investments Other receivables Inventory of gasoline Due from other funds Total assets LIABILITIES Accounts payable Accrued wages Refundable deposits Deferred revenue Total liabilities FUND BALANCES Reserved Unreserved Designated Undesignated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances 34 1990 $2,785,798 64,991 596,080 16,472 243,670 $3,707,011 $445,823 398,536 171,843 230,403 1,246,605 16,472 1,410,897 1,033,037 1989 $3,276,247 37,736 523,113 10,817 53,670 $3,901.583 $421,696 398,894 187,604 220,519 1,228,713 1,674,601 • 998,269 2,460,406 2,672,870 $3,707,011 $3,901,583 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES For The Years Ended June 30, 1990 And 1989 Revenues Property taxes Other taxes Licenses and permits Fines and forfeitures Use of money and property Intergovernmental Charges for services Miscellaneous Interest earned on investments Total revenues Expenditures Current Legislative General government Public safety Community development Culture and recreation Public works Sanitation Debt service Interest Principal Capital outlay Total expenditures Excess of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Operating transfers in Operating transfers (out) Proceeds from capital lease obligations Excess of revenues and other sources over expenditures and other uses Fund balances - July 1 Residual equity transfer (Note L) Fund balances - June 30 35 1990 $2,765,807 3,118,056 290,080. 170,056 262,132 861,688 371,940 1,095,516 245, 915 9,181,190 360,600 2,118,585 4,376,722 505,760 685,447 962,272 298,382 58,686 260,610 455,469 10,082,533 (901,343) 1,739,585 (113,036) 1,626,549 725,206 2,672,870 (937,670) $2,460,406 AND 1989 $2,596,554 2,787,784 296,808 152,503 240,708 866,705 384,459 612,511 209,114 8,147,146 327,476 2,206,077 3,727,294 451,296 567,715 818,911 257,919 156,841 131,107 318,267 8,962,903 (815,757) 1,967,916 (256,178) 1,711,738 895,981 2,258,348 (481,459) $2,672,870 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA GENERAL FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 REVENUES 'Property taxes $2,759,738 $2,765,807 , $6 ' Other taxes 3,089,816 3,118,056 f 28,206409 Licenses and permits 267,365 290,080 22,715 Fines and forfeitures 150,000 170,056 20,056 Use of money and property 242,950 262,132 19,182 Intergovernmental revenues 881,607 861,688 (19,919). Charges for services 376,644 371,940 (4,704) Miscellaneous revenues 1,063,233 1,095,516 32,283 Interest earned on investments 189,105 245,915 56,810 Total revenues 9,020,458 9,181,190 160,732 EXPENDITURES Current Legislative 409,226 360,600 48,626 General government 2,109,044 2,118,585 (9,541). Public safety 4,551,064 4,376,722 174,342 Community development 578,439 505,760 72,679 Culture and recreation 709,872 685,447 24,425 Public works 1,019,083 962,272 56,811 Sanitation 327,303 298,382 28,921 Debt service Interest - 58,686 (58,686) Principal301,561 260,610 40,951 Capital outlay 738,973 455,469 283,504 Total expenditures 10,744,565 10,082,533 662,032 Revenues over (under) expenditures (1',724,107) (901,343) 822,764 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in 1,676,464 1,739,585 63,121 Operating transfers out (113,036) (113,036) Proceeds from capital lease obligations - - Total other financing sources (uses) 1,563,428 1,626,549 63,121 Revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses ($160,679) 725,206 $885,885 FUND BALANCES (DEFICIT), July 1, 1989 2,672,870 Residual equity transfer ($937,670) (937,670) $ FUND BALANCES (DEFICIT), June 30, 1990 $2,460,406 1990 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) 36 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are used to account for revenues derived from specific taxes or other earmarked revenue sources. They are usually required by statute, charter provision, local ordinance, or Federal grant regulation to record particular operating or capital functions of the City. . Special Revenue Funds of the. City of Hermosa Beach fall under the following categories: Federal and State Grant Funds includes Community Development Block Grant and other Federal and State grants. CDBG is a sepa- rate fund and has been established to account for grant revenues. and to provide compliance with Federal grant regulations. Fur- ther, California Statutes'require the establishment of a fund.to account for expenditures funded by state monies. Earmarked Local Revenues - includes Lighting District, County and State Gas Tax, Parks and Recreation Facilities, Utility User Tax Railroad Right/Way and Other, Crossing Guard District, Sewer, Asset Seizure and Forfeiture, and Fire Protection. 37 ASSETS Ca h and investments Reimbursable grants receivable Interest receivable on investments Other receivables Due from other funds Total assets LIABILITIES Accounts payable Due to other funds Accrued wages Contracts payable Deferred revenue Total liabilities FUND BALANCES Reserved Unreserved Designated Undesignated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA Lighting District SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1990 State Gas Tax $1,431,634 $1,024,285 29,297 19,936 24,426 Parks And County Recreation Gas Tax Facilities $33,650 $1,913,917 683 38,511 153,875 Utility User Tax Railroad Utility Right/Way User Tax $674,827 { Community Development Block - Grant $37,330 $109,044 58,240 - 956 $1,485,357 $1.044,221 $34,333 42.106,303 $674.827 $38,286 $167,284 $22,455 $963 $39.824 - 122,762 8,274 30,729 963 162,586 - $463,585' $1,606,506 492,734 1,454,628 580,636 $34,333 499,797 181,130 $38,286 4,- 698 1,454,628 1,044,221 34,333 2,106,303 673,864 38,286 4,698` $1,485,357 $1,044.221 $34.333 $2.106.303 $674,827 $38,286 $167,284 38 CITY OF HERMOSA'BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - CONTINUED June 30, 1990 Crossing Asset Guard Seizure & Fire Total Grants District Sewer Forfeiture Protection 1990 1989 ASSETS Cash and investments $127,427 $64,566 $2,079,600 $84,926 $283,831 $7,865,037 $5,998,581 Reimbursable grants receivable 301,926 - - - 360,166 277,170 Interest receivable on investments - 1,443 40,977 113 6,513 138,429 74,167 Other receivables 6,086 623 - - 31,135 46,035 Due from other funds - 153,875 31,113 Total assets $429,353 $72,095 $2,121,200 $85,039 $290,344' $8,548,642 $6 427,066 LIABILITIES Accounts payable $41,763 $5,276 $91,082 $1,162 $202,525 $552,480 Due to other funds 84,783 - - 190,000 397,545 84,783 Accrued wages - 4,610 10,312 22,732 45,928 36,698 Contracts payable - - 30,997 - 30,997 30,997 Deferred revenue - - 17,574 Total liabilities 126,546 9,886 132,391 213,894 676,995 722,532 FUND BALANCES Reserved -1,377 1,377 Designated - 100,000 - 2,662,825 '531;459 Undesignated 302,807 62,209 1,888,809 (128,855) $290,344 5,208,822 5,171,698 Total fund balances 302,807 62,209 1,988,809 (128,855) 290,344 7,871,647 5,704,534 Total liabilities and fund balances $429,353 $72,095 $2,121,200 $85,039 $290,344 $8,548,642 $6,427,066 39 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES For The Year Ended June 30, 1990. Utility Community Parks And User Tax Development Lighting State County Recreation Railroad Utility Block District Gas Tax Gas Tax Facilities Right/Way User Tax Grant REVENUES Property taxes $327,013 Other taxes (1,593) Fines and forfeitures - $30,568 - $813,721 - $1,220,582 - Use of money and property - Intergovernmental $719,803 - - $79,267 Charges for services - - _ - Miscellaneous 266,343 ,:961:51 298 35 - Interest earned on investments 122- ,139 48,933 $2,249 150,219 67,965 6,143 4,696 Total revenues 447,559 768,736 2,249 447,130 892,984 1,226,760 83,963 EXPENDITURES Current Public safety - Public works 308,489 Community development - - - 79,265 -Debt service Interest - Principal - - - - - Capital outlay 1,981 273 19,478 '6,902,772 Total expenditures 310,470 273 19,478 6,902,772 79,265 Revenues over (under) expenditures 137,089 768,463 2,249 427,652 (6,009,788) 1,226,760 4,698 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in 16,045 39,459 - 7,883 - - Operating transfers out (15,285) (52,272) (5,000) I, (23,925) (15,000) (1,354,771) Proceeds from capital lease obligations - - - . - 5,187,184 - 760 (12,813) (5,000) (16,042) 5,172,184 (1,354,771) Revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses 137,849 755,650 (2,751) 411,610 (837,604) (128,011) 4,698 FUND BALANCES - July 1 1,316,779 288,571 37,084 638,187 1,511,468 166,297 Residual equity transfer 1,056,506 FUND•BALANCES - June 30 $1,454,628 $1,044,221 $34,333 $2,106,303 $673,864, $38,286, $4,698 90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - CONTINUED For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 Crossing Asset State Guard Seizure & Fire Total Grant District Sewer Forfeiture Protection 1990 1989 REVENUES Property taxes $74,795 $401,758 $415,749 Other taxes - 2,063,278 2,055,843 Fines and forfeitures - - Use of money and property - $56,468 56,468 12,636 Intergovernmental $282,974 - $4,450 1,086,494 557,910 Charges for services - 33,950 - 33,950 52,241 Miscellaneous (1,264) (1,079) - - $126,450 401,783 347,147 Interest earned .on investments 1,887 4,723 148,213 5,350 27,549 590,066 424,083 Total revenues 283,597 78,389 186,613 61,818 153,999 4,633,797 3,865,609 EXPENDITURES Current Public safety - 52,304 - 324,701 115,439 492,444 160,312 Public works - 155,832 - - 464,321 436,328 Community development - - - - - 79,265 - Debt service Interest - 595 - 595 926 Principal - 6,886 6,888 8,054 Capital outlay 172,928 - 285,716 - - 7,383,148 1,176,310 Total expenditures 172,928 52,304 449,031 324,701 115,439 8,426,661 1,781,930 - Revenues over (under) expenditures 110,669 26,085 (262,418) (262,883) 38,560 (3,792,864) 2,083,679 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in 24,874 303 1,155,753- Operating transfers out (45,012) (4,990) (11,776) - 1,528,037 1,065,859 (1,528,031) , , Proceeds from capital lease obligations - - - - 5,187r184 (1,343,892) - (20,138) (4,687) 1,143,977E - 4,903,470 (278,033) Revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses 90,531 21,398 681,559 (262,883) 38,560 1,110,606 1,805,646 FUND BALANCES - July 1 212,276 40,811 1,107,250 134,028 251,784 5,704,535 3,417,429 Residual equity transfer - - - 1,056,506 481,459 FUND BALANCES - June 30 $222.L122 $62,209 $1,988,809 ($128,855) $290,344 $7,871,647 $5,704,534 41 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 REVENUES Property taxes Other taxes Interest earned on investments Total revenues EXPENDITURES Current Public works Capital outlay Total expenditures Excess of revenues over expenditures OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Lighting District Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $322,094 $327,013 $4,919 26,000 (1,593) (27,593) 81,550 122,139 40,589 429,644 447,559 17,915 330,957 32,000 308,489 22,468 1,981 30,019 362,957 ' 310,470 52,487 66,687 137,089 70,402 16,045 16,045 (15,285) (15,285) 760 760 Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses $67,447 137,849 FUND BALANCES - July 1 1,316,779 FUND BALANCES - June 30 $11454,628 42 .$70.402 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 State Gas Tax Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVLNUES Intergovernmental $271,442 $719,803 $448,361 Interest earned on investments 23,963 48,933 24,970 Total revenues 295,405 768,736 473,331 EXPENDITURES Capital outlay 418,524 273 418,251. Total expenditures 418,524 273 418,251 Excess of revenues under expenditures (123,119) 768,463 891,582 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in 39,459 39,459 - Operating transfers out (52,272) (52,272) (12,813) (12,813) - ..Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses ($135,932) 755,650 $891,582 FUND BALANCES - July 1 288,571 FUND BALANCES - June 30 $1,044,221 43 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 County Gas Tax Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES Intergovernmental Interest earned on investments $2,145 $2,249 $104 Total revenues 2,145 2,249 104 EXPENDITURES Excess of revenues over expenditures 2,145 2,249 104 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers out (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses ($2,855) (2,751) FUND BALANCES,- July 1 37,084 FUND BALANCES - June 30 $34.333 4 4• $104 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 Parks And Recreation Facilities Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES Other taxes $17,500 $30,568 $13,068 Miscellaneous 240,000 266,343 26,343 Interest_ earned on investments 46,167 150,219 104,052 Total revenues 303,667 447,130 143,463 EXPENDITURES Capital outlay 81,645 19,478 62,167 Excess of revenues over expenditures 222,022 427,652 205,630 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in 7,883 7,883 Operatingtransfers out (23,925) •(23,925) (16,042) (16,042) Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses $205.980 411,610 $205,630 FUND BALANCES - July 1 638,187 Residual equity transfer 1,056,506 FUND BALANCES - June 30 $2,106,303 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 REVENUES Other taxes Miscellaneous Interest earned on investments Total revenues EXPENDITURES Capital outlay Excess of 'revenues over expenditures OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers out Proceeds from capital lease obligations Excess of revenues and other sources over. (under) expenditures and other uses FUND BALANCES July 1 FUND BALANCES - June 30 46 Utility User Tax Railroad Right -Of -Way Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $816,508 $813,721 ($2,787) 11,275 11,298 23 31,455 67,965 36,510 859,238 892,984 33,746 1,725,149 6,902,772 (5,177,623) (865,911) (6,009,788) (5,143,877) (15,000) (15,000) - 5,187,184 (5,187,184) ($880,911) (837,604) 1,511,468 $673,864 $43.307 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 Utility User Tax Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES Other taxes $1,224,762 $1,220,582 ($4,180) Interest earned on investments 4,765 6,143 1,378 Miscellaneous - 35 35 Total revenues 1,229,527 1',226,760 (2,767) Excess of revenues over expenditures 1,229,527 1,226,760 (2,767) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers out (1,354,771) (1,354,771) - Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses ($125,244) (128,011) ($2,767) FUND BALANCES - July 1 166,297 FUND BALANCES - June 30 $38,286 47 CITY OF'HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL REVENUES Interest earned on investments Intergovernmental Total revenues EXPENDITURES Community Development Excess of revenues over expenditures Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses FUND BALANCES - July 1 FUND BALANCES - June 30 For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 48 ' Community Development Budget $1,638 122,015 123,653 122,015 1,638 $1,638 Block Grant (CDBG) Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) Actual $4,696 79,267 83,963 79,265 4,698 4,698 $4,69 8 $3,058 (42,748) (39,690) 42,750 3,060 $3,060 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL REVENUES Intergovernmental Interest earned on investments Miscellaneous Total revenues EXPENDITURES Capital outlay 'Excess of revenues over expenditures OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Excess of revenues and other sources expenditures and other uses FUND BALANCES - July 1 FUND BALANCES - June 30 For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 over (under) 49 Grants Budget Actual $367,942 $282,974 3,340 1,887 (1,264) 371,282 283,597 314,538 172,928 56,749 110,669 24,874 24,874 (45,012) (45,012) (20,138) (20,138) .$36,606 90,531 212,276 $302,807 Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) ($84,968) (1,453) (1,264) (87,685) 141,610 53,925 $53,925. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 Crossing Guard District Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES Property taxes $73,495 $74,745 $1,250 interest earned on investments 1,561 4,723 3,162 Miscellaneous 5,000 (1,079) (6,079) Total revenues 80,056 78,389 (1,667) EXPENDITURES Public safety 61,328 52,304 Excess of revenues over expenditures 18,728 26,085 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in 303 303 Operating transfers out (4,990) (4,990) (4,687) (4,687) Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses $14,041 21,398 FUND BALANCES - July 1 40,811 FUND BALANCES - June 30 $62.209 50 9,024 7,357 $7.357 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 REVENUES Intergovernmental Charges for services Miscellaneous Interest earned on investments Total revenues Sewer Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) $5,000 $4,450 ($550) 20,700 33,950 13,250 81,500 148,213 66,713 107,200 186,613 79,413 EXPENDITURES Current Public works 164,440 155,832 8,608 Debt service Interest 595 (595) Principal 9,070 6,888 2,182 Capital outlay 287,733 285,716 2,017 Total expenditures 461,243 449,031 12,212 Excess of revenues under expenditures (354,043) (262,418) 91,625 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in Operating transfers out 1,155,753 1,155,753 (11,776) (11,776) 1,143,977 1,143,977 Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses i$789,934 881,559 . $91,625, FUND BALANCES - July 1 1,107,250 FUND BALANCES - June 30 $1 988,809 51 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 REVENUES Fines and forfeits $200,000 $56,468 ($143,532) Interest earned on investments 7,810 5,350 (2,460) Total revenues 207,810 61,818 (145,992) EXPENDITURES Current Public safety287,340 324,701 (37,361) Excess of revenues over expenditures (79,530) (262,863) (183,353) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers out Asset Seizure And Forfeiture Variance Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses ($79,530) (262,883) ($183,353) FUND BALANCES - July 1 134,028 FUND BALANCES - June 30 ($128,855) 52 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 REVENUES Miscellaneous Interest earned on investments Total revenues EXPENDITURES Current Public safety Excess of revenues over expenditures OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in Fire Protection Budget $100,000 9,533 109,533 171,117 (61,584 ) Actual $126,450 27,549 Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) $26,450 18,016 153,999 44,466 115,439 38,560 55,678 100,144 Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses($51,584) 38,560 $100,144, FUND BALANCES - July 1 251,784 FUND BALANCES - June 30 $290,344 53 , CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING SCHEDULE. OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL REVEUES Property taxes Interest on investments Other taxes Miscellaneous Charges for current services Fines and forfeits Intergovernmental Total revenues EXPENDITURES Current Public works Public safety Community development Debt service interest principal Capital outlay Total expenditures Excess revenues over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Proceeds from capital lease obligations Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses Fund balances July 1 Residual equity transfer Fund balance June 30 For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 54 Totals Budget $395,589 295,427 2,084,770 356,275 20,700 200,000 766,399 4.119.160 495,397 519,785 122,015 • 9,070 2,859,589 4,005,856 Actual $401,758 590,066 2,063,278 401,783 33,950 56,468 1,086,494 4,633,797 464,321 492,444 79,265 595 6,888 7,383,148 Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) $6,169 294,639 (21,492) 45,508 13,250 (143,532) 320,095 514,637, 31,076 27,341 42,750 (595) 2,182 (4,523,559) 8,426,661 (4,420,805). 113,304 (3,792,864) (3,906,168) 1,244,317 1,244,317 (1,528,031) (1,528,031) 5,187,184 (5,187,184) ($170,410) 1,110,606 $1,281,016 5,704,535 $1,056,506, 1,056,506 $7.871,647 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Enterprise Funds are established to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises and where periodic determination of net income is desired. Expenses, including depreciation, of providing goods or services to the general public are recovered primarily through user charges. Enterprise funds of the City of Hermosa Beach include the following: Parking Fund - All parking lot, meter and fine revenue is deposited to the Parking Fund in order to finance parking operations and capital improvements. Transit Fund - Transit revenue consists primarily of Proposition A funds (the 1/2 cent sales tax for Los Angeles County transporta- tion purposes). The City currently operates a Dial -a -ride program, a commuter bus, and subsidizes bus passes for senior citizens and students. 55 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1990 ASSETS Current assets Cash and investments Interest receivable on investments Other receivables Total current assets Property.and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation Total assets LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable Accrued wages Due to 'other agencies Totals Parking Transit 1990 1989 $269,040 $331,010 $600,050 $455,147 4,607 8,212 12,819 7,675 - 18,618 18,618 273,647 357,840 631,487 462,822 1,717,730 - 1,717,730 1,246,858 $1,991,377 $357,840 $2,349,217 $1,709,680 $66,496 $26,902 $93,398 $103,620 86,033 1,724 87,757 76,988 9,400 Total liabilities 152,529 28,626 181,155 190,008 FUND EQUITY Contributed capital 22,250 - 22,250 22,250 Retained earnings Reserved 14,846 - 14,846 14,846 Unreserved Undesignated 1,801,752 329,214 2,130,966 1,482,576 Total retained earnings 1,816,598 329,214 2,145,812 1,497,422 Total fund equity 1,838,848 329,214 2,168,062 1,519,672 Total liabilities and fund equity $1,9911,377 $357,840 $2,349,217 $1,709,680 56 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 Totals Parking Transit 1990 1989 OPERATING REVENUES Charges for services $2,435,549 $19,496 $2,455 045 ,024 232,029 Intergovernmental - 232 $2,428,228 i 250,822 Total operating revenues 2,435,549 251,520 2,687,069 2,679,055 OPERATING EXPENSES Salaries and wages 701,723 25,220 726,943 632,176 Services and supplies Contractor services 48,564 176,748 225,312 200,646 Supplies 35,559 274 35,833 83,565 Repairs and maintenance 31,991 - 31,991 15,339 Other 182,612 11,259 193,871 Lease obligations 872 - 872 6,367 8,583 Depreciation 26,439 26,439 27,493 Total operating expenses 1,027,760 213,501 1,241,261 974,169 Operating profit 1,407,789 38,019 1,445,808 1,704,886 NONOPERATING REVENUES Interest earned on investments 16,983 32,886 49,869 49,229 Net income before operating transfers 1,424,772 70,905 1,495,677 1,754,115 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in 106,272. 341 106,613 16,039 Operating transfers (out) (1,451,211) (1,451,211) (1,645,341) (Loss) income from other financing sources (1,344,939) 341 (1,344,598) (1,629,302) Net 'income 79,833 71,246 151,079 124,813 RETAINED EARNINGS, July 1 1,224,608 257,968 1,482,576 497,311 497,311 1,357,763 Prior period adjustment - RETAINED EARNINGS July 1 restated 1,721,919 257,968 1,979,887 1,357,763 RETAINED EARNINGS, June 30 $1,801,752 $329,214, $2,130,966 $1,482,576 57 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE. FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 Totals INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH Parking Transit 1990 1989 Cash flows from operating activities Net income $79,833 $71,246 $151,079 $129,813 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation 26,439 (Increases) in interest receivable on investments 26,439 20,978 Decrease in other receivables (711) (4.433) (5.144) (1,083) Increase (decrease) in accounts - (18,618) (18,618) 21,269 payable (35,954) (10,222) 5,647 25,732 Increase (decrease) in accrued wages 11,457 (688). 10,769 42,329 (Decrease) in due to other agencies -(9,400) (9,400) - Net cash provided by operating activities 142,750 2,153 144,903 213,953 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Property and equipment, net of $497,311 restatement (9,478) Net increase in cash 142,750 2,153 144,903 204,475 CASH - July 1 126,290 328,857 455,147 250,672 CASH - June 30 $269.040 $331,010 $600,050 $455,147 58 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1990 And 1989 ASSETS Current assets Cash and investments Interest receivable on investments Other receivables 1990 1989 $269,040 4,607 $126,290 3,896 Total current assets 273',647 130,186 Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation 1,717,730 1,246,858 Total assets $1,991,377 $1,377,044 LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable Accrued wages Due to other agencies Total liabilities FUND EQUITY Contributed capital Retained earnings Reserved Unreserved Undesignated Total retained earnings Total fund equity $66,496. 86,033 $40,764 74,576 152,529 115,340 22,250 22,250 14,846 14,846 1,801,752 .1,224,608 1,816,598 1,239,454 1,838,848 1,261,704 Total liabilities and fund equity $1,991,377 $1,377,044 59 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PARKING ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 And 1989 OPERATING REVENUES Charges for services Intergovernmental 1990 1989 $2,435,549 $2,411,873 Total operating revenues 2,435,549 2,411,873 OPERATING EXPENSES Salaries and wages -301,723 609,077 Services and supplies Contractor services 48,564 50,814 Supplies 35,559 83,417 Repairs and maintenance 31,991 15,339 Other 182,612 6,367 Lease obligations 872 8,583 Depreciation 26,439 27,493 Total operating expenses Operating profit (loss) 1,027,760 1,407,789 801,090 1,610,783 NONOPERATING REVENUES: Interest on investments 16,983 26,445 Net income before operating transfers 1,424,772 • 1,637,228 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers in Operating transfers (out) (Loss) income from other financing sources Net income RETAINED EARNINGS, July 1 Prior period adjustment RETAINED EARNINGS, July 1 restated RETAINED EARNINGS, June 30 60 106,272 14,933 (1,451,211) (1,645,341) (1,344,939) (1,630,408) 79,833 6,820 1,224,608 1,217,788 497,311 1,721,9'19 1,217,788 $1,801,752 $1,224,608 r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For The Years Ended June 30, 1990 And 1989 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH Cash flows from operating activities Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used by operating activities Depreciation (Increase) decrease in interest receivable on investments Increase in accounts payable Increase in accrued wages Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Property and equipment, net of $497,311 restatement Net increase in cash CASH - July 1 CASH - June 30 61 1990 1989 $79,833 $6,820 26,439 20,978 (711) 924 25,732 11,405 11,457 41,459 142,750 81,586. 142,750 126,290 $269,040 (9,478) 72,108 54,182 $126,290 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TRANSIT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1990 And 1989 ASSETS Current assets Cash and investments Interest receivable on investments Other receivables 1990 1989 $331,010 8,212 18,618 $328,857 3,779 Total assets $357,840 $332,636 LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable Accrued wages Due to other agencies Total liabilities FUND EQUITY Retained earnings Unreserved Undesignated Total retained earnings and equity Total liabilities and fund equity 62 $26,902 1,724 $62,856 2,412 9,400 28,626 74,668 329,214 329,214 $357,840 257,968 257,968 $332,636 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TRANSIT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 And 1989 OPERATING REVENUES Charges for services Intergovernmental Total operating revenues OPERATING EXPENSES Salaries and wages Services and supplies Contractor services Supplies. Repairs and maintenance Other 1990 1989 $19,496 $16,355 232,024 250,827 251,520 267,182 25,220 23,099 176,748 149,832 274 148 11,259 Total operating expenses 213,501 173,079 Operating profit 38,019 94,103 NONOPERATING REVENUES Interest on investments 32,'886 22,784 Net income before operating transfers 70,905 116,887 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Operating transfers in 341 1,106 Net income 71,246 117,993 RETAINED EARNINGS, July 1 257,968 139,975 RETAINED EARNINGS, June 30 $329,214 $257,968 63 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TRANSIT ENTERPRISE FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT. OF CASH FLOWS For The Year- Ended June 30, 1990 And 1989 INCREASE (DECREASE). IN CASH Cash flows from operating activities Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used by operating activities Increase in interest receivable on investments Decrease (increase) in other receivables Decrease in accounts payable Increase (decrease) in accrued wages Increase in due to other agencies Net cash used by operating activities and net increase in cash CASH - July 1 CASH - June 30 64 1990 1989 $71,246 $117,993 (4,433) (18,618) (35,954) (688) (9,400) 2,153 328,857 $331,010 (2,007) 21,269 (5,758) 870 132,367 196,490 $328,857 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND Insurance Fund - The Insurance Fund was created to account for costs associated with the City's insurances: liability, workers' compensation, unemployment, Medicare, auto, property and officials' bonds. 65 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1990 And 1989 ASSETS Current assets Cash and investments Interest receivable on investments Deposits Prepaid expenses 1990 1989 $502,601 617,917 6,490 $552,315 6,888 470,886 8,150 Total assets $1,J27,008 $1,038,239 LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accrual for workers' compensation claims $202,000 $207,000 Accounts payable 18,987 52,472 Accrued wages 10,914 10,600 Accrual for,general liability claims 50,000 30,000 Total current liabilities 281,901 300,072 Long-term liabilities Accrual for workers' compensation claims 259,705 239,767 Accrual for general liability claims 341,434 336,559 Total long-term liabilities 601,139 576,326 Total liabilities 883,040 876,398 FUND EQUITY Contributed capital 159,164 278,000 Retained earnings (deficit) Unreserved Designated Undesignated Total retained earnings (deficit) Total fund equity Total liabilities and fund equity $1,127,008 $1,038,239 50,000 34,804 84,804 243,968 125,219 (241,378) (116,159) 161,841 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND .COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGE IN RETAINED EARNINGS Year Ended June 30, 1990 And 1989 Operating revenue Charges for services Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses Salaries and wages Services and supplies Contractor services Supplies Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) Nonoperating revenues - Interest earned on investments 19,992 58,087 Net income (loss) before operating transfers 199,200 (436,280) Other financing sources Operating transfers in 1,763 Net income (loss) 200,963 (436,280) Increase in designated retained earnings self-insurance 75,219 •(75,219) Net change in retained 'earnings 276,182 (511,499) Retained earnings (deficit) undesignated July 1 • (241,378) 270,121 Retained earnings (deficit) undesignated June 30 $34,804 ($241,378) 1990 1989. $794,340 $195,597 50,192 9,440 844,532 205,037 •-374,921 299,942 289,805 398,734 598 728 665,324 699,404 1794208 (494,367) 67 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Years Ended June 30, 1990 And 1989 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH Cash flows from operating activities Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used by operating activities: Decrease in interest receivable on investments Increase in deposits Decrease in prepaid expenses. (Decrease) increase in accrual for workers' compensation claims Increase (decrease) in accounts payable Increase (decrease). in accrued wages Increase in accrual for general liability claims Net cash (used) provided by operating activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Contributed capital Net (decrease) in cash CASH - July 1 CASH - June 30 68 1990 1989 $200,963 ($436,280) 6,888 809 (14 7,031) (237,121) 1,660 6,464 14,938 , (36,810) (33,485) 30,644 314 10,600 24,875 139,448 69,122 (118,836) (49,714) 552,315 $502,601 (522,246) (522,246) 1,074,561 $552,315 AGENCY FUNDS Agency Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in the capacity of agent for individuals. Agency Fund spending is controlled primarily through legal agreements and applicable State and Federal laws. Agency funds of the City were established for the two deferred compensation plans offered to employees. 69 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AGENCY FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1990 And 1989 ASSETS Deferred compensation plan investments LIABILITIES Deferred compensation plan liability 70 Totals 1990 $469,460 $469,460 1989 $391,205 $391,205 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AGENCY FUND STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ASSETS Deferred compensation plan investments Year Ended June 30, 1990 Balance Balance July 1, 1989 Additions Deletions June 30, 1990 $391,205 462,431 $84,176 8469,460 LIABILITIES Deferred compensation plan liability $391,205 $162,431 $84,176„ $469,460 71 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP The General Fixed Assets Account Group is comprised of those fixed assets of a government jurisdiction which are not accounted for in a Proprietary Fund. 72 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA COMPARATIVE SCHEDULES OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY SOURCE June 30, 1990 And 1989 1990 1989 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS Land $12,801,513 $7,090,148 Buildings 1,317,850 1,410,389 Improvements other than buildings 580,837 607,672 Machinery and equipment 961,762 1,062,044 Vehicles 568,228 394,575 Construction in progress 428;061 428,061 Total general fixed assets $16,658,251 $10,992,889 INVESTMENT IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY SOURCE General fund $10,600,946 $10,979,409 Special revenue funds 6,057,305 13,480 Capital projects funds Donations Total investment in general fixed assets $16,658,251 $10,992,889 73 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS - BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY June 30, 1990 Improvements Machinery Other Than And Construction Function and Activity Land Buildings Buildings Equipment Vehicles In Progress Total •General government: City Copncil $15,726 City Clerk 3,266 $15,726 City Treasurer 1,461 11,461 461 City Manager 8,407 $1,003 9,410 Personnel •13,767 13,767 Finance and administration 98,593 8,487 107,080 Other - unclassified $163,429 $226,342. $66,020 455,791 Total general government 163,429 226,342 141,240 9,490 66,020 606,521 Public safety: PFre olice 546,356 129,366 200,278 876,000 55,128 251,726 306,854 Animal control 17,371 15,674 Civil defense 16,809 33,045 16,809 Total public safety 17,371 618,293 396,766 200,278 1,232,708 Streets and highways 3,606 74,624 78,230 Maintenance: Traffic safety 2,499 22,250 24,749 Total streets and highways 6,105 96,874 102,979 Community development 16,524- 8,487 25,011 Culture and recreation Public works 464,795 $494,584 70,575E 7,406 156,351 1,193,711 12,638,084 609,342 86,253 84,166 49,205 5,412 13,472,462 Sanitation 24,859 24,859 Total general fixed assets $12,801,513 $1,317,850 $580,837 $961,762 $568,228 $428,061 $16,658,251 74 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS - BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 General Fixed Other Transfers, General Fixed Assets Adjustments and Assets Function and Activity July 1,. 1989 Additions Deductions* June 30, 1990 General government: City Council $17,631 $1,905 $15,726 City Clerk 3,540 $367 621 3,286 City Treasurer 1,075 633 247 1,461 City Manager 12,304 2,894 9,410 Personnel 13,308 2,504 2,045 13,767 Finance and administration 138,889 530 32,339 107,080 Other 540,559 150 84,921 455,791 Total general government 727,306 4,184 124,972 606,521 Public safety: Police 932,644 58,001 114,645 876,000 Fire 124,000 206,025 23,171 306,854 Animal control 25,459 13,395 5,809 33,045 Civil defense 18,874 2,065 16,809 Total public safety 1,100,977 277,421 145,690 1,232,708 Streets and highways Maintenance 84,042 149 5,961 78,230 Traffic safety 33,704 783 9,738 24,799 Total streets and highways 117,746 932 15,699 102,979 Community development 29,119 2,235 f 6,343 25,011 Culture and recreation 1,201,084 17,720 25,093 1,193,711 Public works 7,814,295 5,679,909 21,739 13,472,462 Sanitation 2,362 22,497 24,859 Total general fixed assets $10,992,889 $6,004,898 ' $339,536 $16,658,251 *Includes transfer of Alano Club (Land and Building) from GFAAG to Parking Fund 75 GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT ACCOUNT .GROUP Capital lease obligations and other forms of general long—term debt are secured by the full faith and credit of the City, and not its individual funds. The amount of such unmatured long-term indebtedness is accounted for in this separate self -balancing account group. 76 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA SCHEDULE OF GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT For The Year Ended June 30, 1990 Amount available and to be provided for payment of general long-term debt: Amount provided General long-term debt payable: Accrued vacation and sick leave Capital lease obligations: Original cost Retired Outstanding Total General Fund Special Revenue Funds Total $758,898 $5,435,764 $6,194,662 758,898 6,964,742 (1,528,978) 5,435,764 $758,898 $5,435,764 77 758,898 6,964,742 (1,528,978) 5,435,764 $6,194,662 STATISTICAL SECTION 78 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE June 30, 1990 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Interest Earned On Investment And i Property Use of Charges And Licenses Fine And Money And Inter- For Fiscal Year Other Taxes And Permits Forfeitures Property governmental Services Other Total 1990-81 $2,228,215 $226,761 $822,833 $750,964 $605,543 $201,131 $29,040 $4,864,487 1981-82 2,717,082 259,721 902,881 346,648 222,165 !167,709 105,242 4,721,448 1982-83 2,748,361 281,174 931,300 290,069 247,332 105,376 70,022 4,673,634 1983-84 3,022,825 273,993 732,952 157,962 180,810 147,078 10,865 4,526,485 1984-85 3,835,610 545,546 242,100 153,662 181,247 268,011 96,908 5,323,084 1985-86 4,796,911 305,714 194,970 317,960 752,928 370,917 13,600 6,753,000 1986-87 5,695,518 421,167 155,355 396,295 760,873 370,786 55,958 7,855,952 1987-88 6,255,374 245,318 113,001 344,399 801,348 343,258 43,260 8,145,958 1988-89 5,384,338 (a) 296,808 152,503 449,822 866,705 384,459 612,511 8,147,146 1989-90 5,883,863 290,080 170,056 508,047 861,688 371,940 1,095,516 9,181,180 (a) Decrease in revenues due to the transfer of Utility User's Tax from the General Fund to Special Revenue Funds. 79 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION June 30, 1990 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Culture General Public Community And Public Debt Capital Fiscal Year Government "Safety Development Recreation Works Services Outlay Total 1980-81 $1,609,482 $1,847,640 $225,890 $249,610 $458,067 $4,390,689 I 1981-82 2,186,196 2,782,458 126,832 283,204 487,492 5,866,182 1982-83 1,469,800 3,133,575 95,627 263,233 573,494 $22,646 5,558,375 1983-84 2,229,338 3,258,689 136,001 314,874 587,883 6,526,785 1984-85 2,740,162 3,596,824 108,102 295,171 558,773 7,299,032 1985-86 2,562,746 3,481,558 321,701 369,802 708,618 7,444,425 1986-87 2,327,537 3,566,172 357,954 390,314 871,457 7,513,434. 1987-88 2,580,491 3,508,521 395,680 469,179 743,995 $3,700 387,717 8,089,283 1988-89 2,533,553 3,727,294 451,296 567,715 1,076,830 (a) 287,948 318,267 8,962,903 1989-90 2,479,185 4,376,722 505,760 685,447 1,260,654 319,296 455,469 10,082,533 4 (a) Marked difference between 1988-89 and previous years is due to the fact that two departments previously included in the State Gas Tax Fund were changed to the General Fund. 80 Fiscal Year 1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) Secured Property $137,144,820 628,525,800 681,670,637 694,876,151 788,025,239 847,632',033 915,271,404 1,035,361,083 1,096,105,305 1,242,162,411 Unsecured Property $1,806,431 7,926,073 7,744,660 8,529,193 11,397,970 10,615,051 14,659,074 15,256,377 16,863,718 16,320,177 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSED AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY June 30, 1990 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Less Exemptions $6,134,640 24,966,926 24,682,953 25,430,258 25,861,115 26,147,817 26,214,828 26,884,210 26,858,358 26,505,493 Net Assessed Value $132,816,611 611,484,947 664,732,344 677,975,086 773,562,094 832,099,267 903,715,650 1,023,733,250 1,086,110,665 1,231,977,095 Estimated Valuation $138,951,251 636,451,873 689,415,297 703,405,344 799,423,209 858,247,084 929,930,478 1,050,617,460 1,112,969,023 '1,258,482,588 Percentage Increase 7% 158 9% 2% 14% 3% 13% 13% 6% 13% B.' Ratio Of Net Assets Value To Estimated Actual Value (%) 23.90 96.08 96.42 96.38 96.77 96.95 97.18 97.44 97.59 97.89 Source: County of Los Angeles Auditor -Controller (a) Assessed valuations available from the County of Los Angeles beginning in fiscal year 1982 are based on 100% of full value per Section 135 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. Assessed valuations available from the County prior to fiscal year 1982 are expressed as 25% of full value. 81 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PROPERTY TAX RATES AND TAX LEVIES - ALL OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS (Per $100 of Assessed Valuation) June 30, 1990 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Los Metropolitan Angeles High Flood Sanitation Water Hospital Fiscal Year General County Schools Control District District District Total 1980-31 4.000000 .003500 .042100 .115900 .001700 .079000 .004700 4.246900 1981-82 (a) 1.000000 .000827 .008553 .027019 .000378 .019800 .001089 1.057666 1982-83 (a) 1.000000 .000604 .007319 .023521 .000342 .016600 .000941 1.049327 1983-84 (a) 1.000000 .000649 .006183 .017284 .000301 .023700 .000548 1.048665 1984-85 (a) 1.000000 .000578 .005720 .015867 .015600 .000917 1.038682 1985-86 (a) 1.000000 .000442 .004877 .016081 .016400 .000658:. 1.038458 1986-87 (a) 1.000000 .004288 .013598 .014800 .000517 1.033203 1987-88 (a) 1.000000 .005051 .002928 .012257 .011200 1.031436 1988-89'(a) 1.000000 .002781 .010487 .011000 1.024268 1989-90 (a) 1.000000 .002242 .006944 .012100 1.021286 Source: Los Angeles County Tax Collector (a) Assessed valuations available from the County of Los Angeles, beginning in fiscal year 1982, are based on 100% of full value per Section 135 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. Assessed valuations available from the County prior to fiscal year 1982 are expressed as 25% of full value. 82 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS June 30, 1990 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Total Total Percentage Fiscal Current Current Of Levy Year Levy Collection Collected 1980-81 $1,126,850 $1,068,919 95.99 1981-82 1,258,074 1,195,547 95.03 1982-83 1,398,662 1,330,864 95.15 1983-84 1,504,458 1,427,322 94.87 1984-85 1,708,603 1,620,065 94.82 1985-86 1,787,221 1,714,190 95.91 1986-87 1,950,766 1,865,700 95.64 1987-88 2,219,729 2,131,984 96.05 1988-89 2,472,402 2,351,021 95.09 1989-90 2,825,903 2,663,696 94.26 Source: County of Los Angeles Auditor -Controller. 83 a • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMPUTATION OF LEGAL DEBT MARGIN June 30, 1990 (Unaudited) Total assessed value•of all real and personal property $1,231,977,095 Legal debt limit - 15% of total assessed valuation (1) 184,796,564 Amount of debt applicable to limit (2) Legal debt margin 184,796,564 Percentage of legal debt limit authorized 0% Source: City of Hermosa Beach - Finance Department (1) Per California Government Code Section 43605 (2) The City has no debt payable from taxes levied upon property in the City. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA STATEMENT OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT June 30, 1990 (Unaudited) 1988/89 Assessed Valuation: $1,231,977,095 Direct And Overlapping Bonded Debt: Los Angeles County Los Angeles County Building Authorities Los Angeles County Flood Control District Los Angeles County Flood Control District Certificates of Participation Metropolitan Water District City of Hermosa Beach Certificates of Participation Debt Applicable Outstanding .365% $319,740 .365% 5,356 5,356,379 .376- 597,364 .376 .199 100.000 167,527 1,425,954 5,996,405 Total direct and over- lapping bonded debt $13,863,369 Ratios To Assessed Valuation: Direct Debt .49% Total Debt 1.13% Share Of Authorized And Unsold Bonds: Metropolitan Water District Los Angeles County Flood Control District $99,500 69,372 Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc 85 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DEMOGRAPHIC STATISTICS June 30, 1990 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) (2) Per (3) (4) Fiscal (I) Capita Unemployment School Year Population Income Rate Enrollment 1980-81 18,070 - $1,154 1981-82 18,255 $16,355 905 1982-83 18,418 - 6.9 886 1983-84 18,540 18,574 4.9 865 1984-85 18,559 5.0 665 1985-86 19,142 21,588 4.7 712 1986-87 19,383 - 4.1 1,107 1987-88 19,757 25,950 3.4 1,108 1988--89 19,764 3.3 1,159 1989-90 19,673 3.8 1,173 Data Sources (1) State of California Department of Finance, estimated population. (2) U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, estimated per capita income available every two years. Next available will be 1990 Census, available 1990-91. (3) State of California Employment Development Department, City's rates unavailable prior to 1983. Expressed as a percentage estimated based on County movement since 1980 Census. (4) Hermosa Beach School District CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION VALUE, PROPERTY VALUE AND BANK DEPOSITS June 30, 1990 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited) Residential Commercial Total Fiscal No. Of No. Of Assessed Year Permits Valuation Permits Valuation Valuation 1980-81 175 $3,497,248 29 $620,725 $138,951,251 1981-82 164 4,245,137 55 5,940,605 636,451,873 1982-83 172 3,662,813 47 1,958,080 689,415,297 1983-84 209 12,258,090 41 11,806,499` 703,405,344 1984-85 239 13,306,320 48 6,594,037 799,423,209 1985-86 264 14,686,577 50 5,040,953 858,247,084 '1986-87 286 19,943,665 49 13,176,147 929,930,478 1987-88 234 13,735,644 33 867,180 1,050,617,460 1988-89 229 15,911,529 38 3,630,235 1,112,969,023 1989-90. 293 17,707,285 38 397,350 1,258,482,588 f Sources: Construction values - City of Hermosa Beach Department of Building and Safety. Bank deposits - Decision Research Science, Inc. (Includes Savings and Loans) '87 Bank Deposits (In Thousands) $70,436 75,565 65,514 83,439 88,544 90,368 107,421 109,485 144,798 148,834 Company & Policy Number General Reinsurance X-12097 (limit 0.0 Mil.) Fireman's Fund C-26 XLS-18609 48 (limit Statutory above $10 Mil.) Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) #ICAPL 1009 St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company 1594JD3547 First State Insurance Co. #GC006464 RLI Insurance. CO. * ISFC 00560 (* limit $5 Mil) Transamerica Insurance Co.** (limit $9,720,828 excess of $5 Mil) XPT 0145-5290 Policy Period 7-1-89/90 7-1-89/90 12-18-89/90 7-1-89/90 12-18-89/7-1-90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH SCHEDULE OF INSURANCE June 30, 1990 (Unaudited) 88 Limits & Coverages Statutory Excess Workers' Compensation. $1 Mil. Employers' Liability $300,000 S.I.R. Excess Liability Insurance . $100,000 S.I.R. $10 Mil. Limit for Bodily Injury or Property Damage or Personal Injury or Public Officials' E&O. Comprehensive & Collision. Coverage with $2,500 deductible for Non -Safety High Value Vehicles. Physical Damage Vehicle Ins. for High Value Fire vehicles. $5,000 deductible "All Risk" of direct physical loss or damage, excluding flood and Earthquake, to Real and Personal Property, EDP Equipment, Media and Extra Expense, Rents, and Mobile Equipment. Total Insured Values of $14,720,828. $2,500 deductible. Annual Premium $10,301 $222,428 $8,798 $3,003 $9,241 Ii Company & Policy Number Fidelity & Deposit #28105 Fidelity & Deposit #30285009 Fireman's'Fund Ins. Co. SNR11132701589 Fidelity & Deposit #0956182-1 Fidelity & Deposit #30149880 Fidelity & Deposit #30149881 Fireman's Fund SNR11132686426 Policy Period 11-7-89/90 12-12-89/11-30-91 4-10-89/93 7-1-89/92 2-17-90/91 2-22-90/91 3-13-89/93 CITY OF. HERMOSA BEACH SCHEDULE OF INSURANCE June 30, 1990 (Unaudited) 89 Limits & Coverages $100,000 Public Officials Bond for Viki Copeland as Finance Dir. $10,000 Public Officials Bond for Elaine Doerfling as City Clerk $10,000 Notary Bond for Linda Riddle, Deputy City Clerk ' $25,000 Public Employee Dishonest Clause (Blanket Bond) $2,500 Deductible $100,000 Public Officials Bond for Gary Brutsch as City Treasurer $100,000 Public Officials Bond for Kevin Northcraft as City Manager $10,000 Notary Bond for Laurie Duke as Secretary of the City Manager Annual Premium $505 $186 $100 (4 year pre -paid) $1,470 (3 year pre -paid) $500 $350 $100 (4 year pre -paid) • 1J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL TAXPAYERS June 30, 1990 (Unaudited) Percentage Of Total Assessed Assessed Value Assessed Value JMB Income Property $21,419,529 1.70% Hermosa Pavilion Ltd. 11,227,653 .89 Playa Pacifica Ltd. 9,037,699 .72 Allen Ginsburg 8,459,603 .67 Int'l Church of Four Square 6,619,050 .53 Caird, James/Riho 5,532,260 .44 George Schuler 4,670,095 .37 Hermosa Beach Office Plaza 3,869,892 .31 Chunibhai Patel 3,475,767 .28 Roger Bacon 3,331,525 .26 Source: Hinderliter, de Llamas and Associates Note: Reported data believed to be reliable but accuracy is not guaranteed. 90 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA Name City of Hermosa Beach Hope Chapel Dive N' Surf Von's Vasek Polak, Inc. Marie Callender's General Telephone Hermosa Beach Unified School District Alpha Beta Learned Lumber MAJOR EMPLOYERS June 30, 1990 (Unaudited) 91 Type Of Business Local Government Church Wholesale Manufacturing Grocery $tore Automobile Sales Restaurant Telephone Service Public School Grocery Store Wholesale/Retail Lumber CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TAXABLE SALES BY CATEGORY June 30, 1990 Calendar Years 1980-89 (Unaudited) Sales 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 Retail stores Apparel stores $1,554 $1,686 $1,738 $1,642 $1,927 $2,187 $2,174 $2,110 $2,093 $2,482 General merchandise 1,743 (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) Drug stores (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) Food stores 8,489 8,735 9,012 11,234 11,721 13,979 16,828 17,876 17,166 18,053 Packaged liquor stores 2,912 2,855 2,708 2,706 2,878 2,585 2,436 2,110 2,212 2,400 Eating and drinking places 10,716 11,470 12,957 14,293 17,902 21,267 24,973 28,364 30,805 30,917 Home furnishings and appliances 1,663 2,239 2,093 2,889 2,932 3,2953,215 2,877 1,852 2,199 - Building materials and farm tools 5,221 5,369 4,893 4,820 5,508 5,663 6,671 8,140 9,402 10,971 Automobile dealers and supplies 21,578 24,926 27,915 31,430 36,570 46,230 47,912 33,464 44,948 48,628 Service stations 6,584 6,698 6,542 6,111 5,837 5,743 4,752 5,085 (a) 4,919 Other 7,854 9,647 9,537 9,543 9 79 12,581 16,648 20,914 27,892 23,796 Total retail stores 68,314 73,625 77,395 84,668 95,065 113,530 125,609 120,940 136,370 144,365 All other outlets 8,731 9,253 7,992 10,739 12,935 15,495 13,r 643 14,946 14,136 16,028 Total all outlets $77,045 $82.878 $85,387 $95,407 $108,000 $129.025 $139,252 $135.886 $150,506 $160,393 Source: State Board of Equalization (a) Sales omitted because publication would result in disclosure of confidential information. Figures are included with other retail store totals. 92 CITY OF'HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICS June 30, 1990 (Unaudited) Date of incorporation January 14, 1907 Formof government Council -Manager Area 1.3 square miles Miles of streets 47.4 Number of street lights 575 (City Owned), 819 (Electric Utility) Fire protection: Number of stations Number of firefighters and paramedics Police protection: Number of stations Number of sworn officers Number of non -sworn officers Sanitary Sewers Building permits issued Recreation and culture: Number of parks Beach Hermosa Valley Green Belt (open space park) Community Theatre Employees: Full-time 93 18 1 36 16 34 miles 331 18 with 12.16 acres 36.52 acres 19.50 acres 1 165 December 04, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 11, 1990 1989-90 Report to Management From Independent Auditor Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the 1989-90 Report to Management and the response from the Finance Director, City Treasurer, and Personnel Director. Background As part of the annual financial audit and as required by our request for proposals for audit services, the auditors provide the City with a report on observations and recommendations that the City may wish to explore and/or implement. Analysis The following responses correspond to each observation and recommendation in the Report to Management. A. PAYROLL 1. IMPROVE CONTROLS OVER PAYROLL PROCESSING The Personnel Department agrees that high accuracy in payroll information submitted by operating departments would reduce time spent by Personnel to correct errors. Personnel is responsible for crosschecking the exception slips and time sheets submitted by each department. Selection of a new or upgraded Payroll/Personnel Data Processing system will commence when the decision on the future of the City's computer needs is made. Automation of the accrual recordkeeping will greatly assist the Personnel Clerk, however crosschecking will still be necessary. The Personnel Department plans to stress to departmentaldirectors the importance of reviewing payroll information, as recommended by the auditors. Additionally, a log of errors will be created so that departments can review and alleviate common errors. B. CASH AND INVESTMENTS 1. IMPROVE EFFICIENCY IN PROCESSING CASH RECEIPTS: Staff concurs that will reduce errors recommendation was automation of the cash receipt function and increase efficiency. Further, this identified by the Finance Department in the five year data processing plan as well as an interface between the cash register and Financial System to allow receipts to be entered only once. At this time, redundancy exists and efficiency is lost. 2. Trade Date Should Be Used As The Basis for Recording Securities Transactions The City does currently record investments and interest using the trade date, which is the actual date the investment amount is deducted from our bank account. In most cases, a very short period of time exists between the time the investment is made and the cash is deducted from our bank account (usually one day). However, the auditor's point is well taken with respect to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and our method of accounting will be changed to conform. The effect of any past transactions would be minimal and immaterial in accounting terms. C. FIXED ASSETS 1. Improve Controls Over the Fixed Asset System The deletion referred to was in fact entered into the Fixed Asset System but in an incorrect manner. Additions are added monthly, which is adequate, and are balanced to the general ledger. Even though additions are being reconciled to the general ledger, the complete reconciliation is done at year end which requires too much time. Part of the difficulties lie in the fact that the Fixed Asset System was one of the applications purchased from a vendor who went bankrupt. The system was installed by our contract programmer, so virtually no training was given. The manual that came with the system does not address all problems encountered andof course no updates are available. The staff felt however that the implementation of a fixed asset system was valuable for control purposes and to enable the City to receive an unqualified audit opinion even though we realized problems would exist. The accountant has contacted several other cities using the system and resolved all of the issues noted by our auditor. Additions and deletions will be entered monthly and a complete reconciliation of the general ledger and fixed asset system performed monthly. 2. Capitalize Costs Related to Rebuilding Parking Enforcement Vehicles The purchase of the parts to rebuild the Cushmans was not identified as such on the purchase order, so no one in Finance realized the life of the vehicles was actually being extended. Departments will be educated to understand that purchases of this nature need to be identified as items affecting fixed assets. The fixed asset policies will be amended to incorporate a reference to this type of situation and the Finance Department staff has been alerted to question parts purchases which may result in extension of the life of the vehicle, as opposed to parts for maintenance, which are not recorded to the fixed asset system. Staff appreciates the observations made by the objective eye of the auditor and the recommendations which provide an opportunity to improve our operation. It should be noted that none of these observations are significant or "material" in the accounting sense. The auditors have given us an unqualified opinion which indicates that in their opinion our financial statements fairly represent our financial position. CVO /-82A6(27-4 Gary Brui h City Treasurer Viki Copeland Finance. -Direct rte. ga-(-711Y-44.(twiz Robert Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: Acee Kevin B: Northeraft City Manager CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA REPORT TO MANAGEMENT Year Ended June 30, 1990 Coopers &Lybrand September 21, 1990 certified public accountants 1000 West Sixth Street Post Office Box 17919 Los Angeles, Ca 9C017-0919 telephone (213) 481-1000 telecopy (213) 482-6363 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Hermosa Beach, California in pnr.:ipal areas of the world Dear Mayor and City Council Members: In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of the City of Hermosa Bach for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1990, we considered the City's internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the general purpose financial statements. Although our audit was not designed to provide assurance on the internal control structure, we noted certain matters involving the internal control structure and its operation, and are submitting for your consideration related recommendations designed to help the City make improvements and achieve operational efficiency. Our comments reflect our desire to be of continuing assistance to the City. The accompanying comments and recommendations are intended solely for the information and use of the Mayor, City Council, management, and others within the organization. Very truly yours, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA REPORT TO MANAGEMENT INDEX A. PAYROLL 1. Improve Controls Over Payroll Processing B. CASH AND. INVESTMENTS 1. Improve Efficiency In Processing Cash Receipts 2. Trade Date Should Be Used As The Basis For Recording Securities Transactions C. FIXED ASSETS 1. Improve Controls Over The Fixed Asset System 2. Capitalize Costs Related To Rebuilding Parking Enforcement Vehicles Page 1 2 A. PAYROLL 1. Improve Controls Over Payroll Processing Observation It appears exception slips and time sheets are not properly reviewed by operating departments. Exception slips and time sheets should be more thoroughly reviewed by the operating departments to ensure completeness and accuracy prior to submitting the payroll to the personnel clerk for verification. This deficiency could cause payroll information to be incomplete and inaccurate. Recommendation We recommend the City emphasize to operating departments the importance of reviewing payroll information to reduce the level of review needed by the personnel clerk... B. CASH. AND INVESTMENTS 1. Improve Efficiency In Processing Cash Receipts Observation Currently,the City's cash receipts are processed manually through the cash register and are manually batch processed. A significant portion of time is spent on the tedious and inefficient task of manually preparing these cash receipts. Recommendation We recommend the City consider installing a computerized cash register that will automatically generate a receipt for every transaction processed. At the end of each day, a cash receipts summary is generated by the computer to be used to reconcile these receipts. This automated cash register would eliminate the likelihood of errors occurring, as well as increase the efficiency of the individuals involved. • 2. Trade Date Should Be Used As The Basis For Recording Securities Transactions Observation The City currently uses the settlement date as the basis of recording their securities transactions rather than using the trade date, which is the preferred generally accepted accounting principles method. Using the settlement date rather than the trade date may result in the misstatement of investment and accrued interest account balances. Recommendation We recommend the City use the trade date for recording investment and interest transactions to properly state investment values and the related interest. • . FIXED ASSETS 1. Improve Controls Over The Fixed Asset System Observation The Fixed Asset Summary for the Enterprise Fund did not reconcile to the general ledger due to a deletion that was not input into the Fixed Asset -System. In addition, the Fixed Asset Summary for the General Fixed Asset Account Group did not reconcile to the general ledger. Though a lengthy process is involved in reconciling the Fixed Asset System to the general ledger, it should be done on a periodic basis to decrease the likelihood that an error in the fixed asset balances will not be detected on a timely basis. Recommendation In order to decrease the likelihood of errors in the fixed asset balances, we recommend timely input of all deletions and additions into the Fixed Asset System and periodic reconciliation of the Fixed Asset System to the general ledger. 2. Capitalize Costs Related To Rebuilding Parking Enforcement Vehicles Observation Costs of $17,000 were incurred and expensed to rebuild four Cushman Parking Enforcement Vehicles. These costs extended the life of the vehicles so that new ones will not have to be purchased, and should have been capitalized. The effect of expensing the $17,000 instead of capitalizing is to understate net income for amount expensed and understate fixed assets and related depreciation. Recommendation We recommend the City consider amounts spent and the asset's useful life to determine what should be capitalized and what should be expensed. 2 December 4, 1990 C Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of December 11, 1990 REPORT REGARDING THE STATUS OF CURRENT STRAND SAFETY MEASURES RECOM1 D , rtJN It is recommended, that City Council appoint a Strand Safety Committee to study the current uses of the Strand and make recommendations regarding the use of the Strand. BACXRESOXIi At the regular Council meeting of October 14, 1986, City Council appointed a Strand Safety Advisory Committee to study the entire Strand safety problem and instructed the Committee to come back with recommendations regarding possible solutions to improve the safety on the Strand. During subsequent meetings of the Strand Safety Committee various ideas to improve the safety of the Strand were discussed These included building a separate bike path on the beach,.moving the bike path to another area and banning bicycles from the Strand, placing speed bumps'along the Strand, placing barricades along the Strand, and many others. The final recommendation made to Council at the regular meeting of March 24, 1987 was to designate a walk zone on the Strand between 10th and 15th streets, to place flashing lights and isign8 to designate the walk zone, and to require bicycles andskateboards to be walked. when the lights were flashing. The committee recommended that the lights should only be turned on during heavily conjested times, and that police officers would make the determination as to when the lights would be operated. After the necessary construction was completed, the Police Department published a Strand safety pamphlet and began a concerted education phase to acquaint the Strand users with the walk zone rules. This effort included placing officers at each end of the walk zone to hand out the pamphlets and warn persons riding bicycles and skateboards of. the new law. The local bicycle shops and newspapers were also contacted and advised of the walk zone. The education phase continued for several weeks with the officers reporting over 90% voluntary compliance with the walk zone.. The enforcement phase of the walk zone then began and offiters either warned or cited violators 1 r ANAL'Y' S I S No separate records of the number of citations written for bicycle and skateboard violations were being kept until October 1988. From that date, there were 59 citations written. In 1989 there was a concentrated effort to eliminate trick riding at the pier head. Officers wrote 233 citations in 1989 with over half of them being written in the vicinity of the pierhead. The problem with trick riding was eliminated and the number of citations for the Strand declined. For 1990, officers have written 92 citations to date. Accidents reported as Strand accidents included all types of paramedic responses to the beach, the waterline, and the Strand. A manual search'of records for 1988 to date was conducted in order to break out the actual number of accidents that occurred on the Strand by type of accident, the results are listed below: Total Strand calls - 73. 1988 Bike vs skater - 3 Bike vs Bike - 6 Bike vs Pedestrian - 3 Bike vs Wall - 1 Skateboard vs Pedestrian 1 Fall from Skates 10 Fall from Bike - 9 Fall from Skateboard 1 Misc. calls such as seizures assaults, intoxication - 39 1989 Total Strand calls - 86 Bikevs. skater - 2 Bike vs Bike - 2 Bike vs Pedestrian - 3 Skateboard vs Pedestrian - 1 Fall from Skates 5 Fall from Bike 21 Fall from Skateboard 3 Skater vs Pole 1 Bike vs Vehicle 1 Skater vs Vehicle 1 Misc. calls such as seizures assaults, intoxication - 46 1990, to Date (November) Total Strand calls - 56 Bike vs Skater Bike vs Bike Bike vs Pedestrian 1 Fall from Skates - 10 Fall from Bike - 11 Misc. calls such as seizures assaults, intoxication 30 Note, all of the accidents/calls that we have records of involve injuries of some degree ranging from scrapes and bruises to broken bones. It is reported by several individuals that many accidents occur on the Strand that go unreported. We have no verification of the numbers or locations of these unreported accidents if they did occur. - 2 Only 100 of the 210 reported strand calls can be classed as actual accidents that occurred on the Strand and only 27 of those accidents involved actual collisions between bicyclists, skateboarders, and or pedestrians. Information obtained regarding these collisions indicate that the primary causation factor for each of the collisions is either negligence or inattention on the part of at least one of the individuals involved. A manual search was conducted for the 1990 accidents to determine where the accidents were occurring. Of the 5 reported collision accidents for 1990, one happened in the 1900 block, one in the 1700 block, one in the 100 block, one in the 2200 block, and one in the 800 block. No collisions were reported in the walk zone between 10th and 15th Streets and officers continue to report over 90% voluntary compliance in the walk zone. As mentioned above, the primary causes of the collision accidents seem to be negligence or inattention. Contributing causes appear to be the attitudes of the persons using the Strand. Everyone thinks that they have the right of way and all others should yield to them and they fail to use courtesy and common sense. As long as the mix of bicycles, pedestrians, and skaters, with their attitudes and inattention continues, accidents will occur. There seems to be only one viable solution and that is to have separate bike and pedestrian paths. This was recognized by the Strand Safety Committee, but there are many complicated and financial considerations involved with this particular solution. There have been numerous letters and citizens comments regarding the Strand, its use and the safety concerns. Many of those comments have included suggested improvements for the Strand. In order to get a comprehensive view of the concerns of the Strand users, staff believes that it would be appropriate to appoint a new committee to hear from those concerned users and to evaluate the Strand use. To that end,staff recommends that Council appoint a Strand Safety Committee to evaluate the current use of the Strand and return to Council withproposedsolutions and recommendations. Staff also recommends that the Committee be comprised of representatives from Strand residents, biking enthusiasts, skaters and skateboarders, joggers and walkers, law enforcement, and public works. Concur: Kevin B. North c'raft City Manager XiNti An. "ony Antich Director of Publ c Works ctfu •1 Submitted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety C/t /l t tv-7--) /th /12t/t2t- r>142 e5t. G44,(/TAA CkV 7L //// ri 7A-7, .4_,,_/-._ Ar,v .1,,,, ,i- xo .:1,4--s--4' i—e„--,_ ,e.„,..e., 1,--e--,---, d -e- X W,(,-1.- 5- ,5 k(f so,A.ei all --114--(zt ok_ (110-4u14 L --4--C December 4, 1990 Carol Breidenbach 2140 The Strand Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 City of TJ1ermosa nlJeacIJ, Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 Dear Ms. Breidenbach: We are in receipt of your letter to the City Council received November 27, 1990, regarding bicycles on the Strand. Your letter will be copied to the City Council as part of a report on this subject for the December 11, 1990 Council meeting. Your letter has been referred to the Public Safety Department for necessary action and response. That department will be contact- ing you with the results of your inquiry. If you wish to check on the status, the department's number is 318-300. Thank you for your interest in improving our community. Sincerely, 4/ Kevin B. Northciraft City Manager cc: Public Safety (for attachment to 12-i1 Council memo) Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council 4-'74-74"`" ecember 5, 1990 � /�.- 96 City Council Meeting of December 11, 1990 REPORT ON GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM AND CITY-WIDE PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council appropriate funds in the amount of $7667 from the Parking Fund to initiate the first phase of two phases of the Public Information Program for the General Services (G.S.) Department. Phase I refers directly to the Department's Parking Enforcement division. The initial cost of Phase I includes: an Officer uniform change ($2967); advertisements, posters and a twenty -page public information booklet detailing parking "Do's and Don'ts" in the City ($4500); and training materials specifically pertaining to parking ($200). (The cost savings in this proposal from the March 27th. recommendation is approximately $1100). Background: At the regularly scheduled meeting of March 27, 1990 Council approved the current Parking Enforcement Policies and Procedures. However Council also decided to table the expenditure of funds, until the new Director reviewed the proposed program and the public relations side of --the "Citizen as Customer"-- in conjunction with the overall City goal adopted for all departments regarding all City programs. Funding for Phase I for the General Services Department in total, was not included in the 90-91 Budget. A copy of the March 27th. agenda item is attached. City staff is also proceeding with development and implementation of the city-wide "Citizen as Customer" program. Aspects of that program include: formation of a "Citizen as Customer" employee committee consisting of a team leader from each department to coordinate training, review and recommend ideas for increasing program awareness (posters, buttons, etc); and provide feedback to the departments to increase inter -departmental communication. Public Relations, customer service, phone etiquette, and effective communication training is being developed and scheduled for'all employees utilizing existing resources as well as through the City's Employee Assistance Program. Analysis: Phase I of the General Services Public Information Program consists of two components: Public Relations and Advertising. 1. PUBLIC RELATIONS COMPONENT a) Change the name from Parking Enforcement to Community Services; b) Change the current Officer uniform(s); c) Establish one-to-one dialogue with businesses,. merchants, Chamber of Commerce and City commissions; d) Participate in local Neighborhood Watch groups, schools and other organization(s) meetings; e) Provide in-house training for personnel; f) Increase officer and supervisor accountability; g) Provide periodic updates to Council on the status of the program; Name Change As the Parking Enforcement division is evolving, it is essential that a complete disassociation withthe current image also occur. If we are to change the public's perception of the personnel, then the officers' and management's perceptions of their tasks and themselves must also change. For this reason, staff recommends the modification of the division's name from "Parking Enforcement" to "Community Services". This will eliminate the negative connotation of a regulator. Uniform Change To eliminate the current stigma of a "Gestapo" likeness, staff recommends an alteration of the uniform colors from the current drab beige and brown, to light and dark blues. A complete uniform change will facilitate in modifying the citizens and personnel perceptions of the parking enforcement tasks. A physical change will also assist in publicizing the proposed program. All officers and supervisors would return their entire current uniforms. The complete, new uniforms would then be issued. The new uniform per officer would consist of: one (1) long sleeved shirt, two (2) short sleeved shirts, two (2) pairs of pants, one (1) jacket, patches for shirts and jackets, and a name tag. The total estimated cost for thirteen uniforms is $3900. As an offset to the cost of the new uniforms, staff has proposed to the union and affected employees that the existing uniform allowance of $18.75/month be waived for twelve (12) months. The G.S. officers have indicated their acceptance of this proposal. Upon Council approval of the program, the new uniforms would be issued by February 1, 1991. The budgeted funds available in the Uniform Parking Enforcement account would be used against the total cost. This would reduce the total cost from $3900 to $2967. This agreement results in an $1125 savings for this fiscal year and $1575 during the next fiscal year. An addendum to the current union contract will be,added upon approval of this proposal. The savings with this waiver will be $2700, which will 2 offset the cost of the new uniforms. The difference between the adjusted new uniforms cost and the waiver amount is $267. The old uniforms would be retained and issued to temporary personnel such as summer hires. These uniforms would be gradually replaced by the new uniforms through employee turnover. Public Communication Staff also believes that the currently perceived communication gap between the Department and the community must be bridged. In order to accomplish this, we are proposing the following: meet with all interested businesses, commissions and local organizations to discuss differences of opinion, solicit suggestions'and recommendations, provide a non -confrontational forum for the exchange of ideas and concerns, and involve the "customer" in the evolution process. Surveys to the general populace will also be used to collect constructive information. The Department will also create and implement the use of a follow-up form for customer and inter -departmental evaluations of provided services. Beyond the cost for mailing, there is no anticipated, additional cost associated with these items as they will be completed during the standard work shifts. Any forms or materials will be created and generated within the Department and within the established budgets. Training The proposed purchase of training materials will facilitate the continuing education and promote the desired performance of the officers. The use of audio/visual aids, manuals, group and interpersonal skills training, and problem solving techniques development will enhance the knowledge and expertise of the personnel. These aids and tools will be retained as a resource to be utilized as an orientation for new/replacement personnel as well as a 'refresher' course for existing staff. For the past five months, the Hearing Officers have been keeping citation and dismissal logs. This information will be formally tabulated for report generation. The report will then be distributed to all of the officers and supervisors for review and discussion. This information will be beneficial in examining violation trends and issuance discrepancies/errors. This will further assist in the training/retraining process(es). Policies and Procedures All1G.S. Department policies and practices will be reviewed for thoroughness, correctness and clarity. Updates/new items will be generated to upgrade the current procedures. This will assist in reducing confusion and frustration, and increase employee understanding. The combined result will be an overall increase in personnel responsibility and accountability. A formal procedural and operations manual will be updated/created and distributed to all Department personnel. Additional areas will be added during the subsequent phase of this program. Periodic checks for compliance will be conducted and evaluated. The results will be documented for use in employee reviews, merit/step increases or prescribed disciplinary actions. As these tasks are or will be incorporated into existing workloads, there are no anticipated, additional costs for the completion of these items. 2. ADVERTISING COMPONENT a) A city-wide employee contest to determine the best theme ads and posters to promote; b) Adsin the local and regional newspapers as well as articles in the City Newsletter; c) Posters to be placed in all public places; d) A booklet to be distributed to the citizens (via mail) of the community and made available to regional areas. The booklet will also be located in specified public places; Theme Contest ariolP Positive advertising is a very powerful tool and essential to the overall success of the program. This approach has proven to be beneficial in other cities. Staff proposes to conduct an inter -departmental "Make A Difference" contest for theme oriented posters, flyers and slogans. Recognition will be awarded to the selected entry(ies). The local expertise in the City would be solicited to sponsor this event by supplying their talents and time to create formal presentation materials. This will result in a cost savings for the City as it would not be necessary to contract for aid from expensive advertising firms. Booklet Additionally, the current "Do's and Don'ts" booklet on parking would be updated, reproduced and distributed to residents. Copies would also be available in all public areas including: the City Library, Community Resources, the Lifeguard Station, and monitored parking lots (VPD). Staff will also ask VPD to assist in offsetting the cost of generating the new booklet. -Examples of other communities' promotions and a copy of the current "A Guide: The Do's and Don'ts of Parking in Hermosa Beach" are attached for review. Status Reporting As with any system, controls will be established to evaluate the program's progress. A method of reporting will be devised based upon community and organizational feedback. Findings and action status will be documented and submitted to Council for review and recommendation. Staff proposes that the status be incorporated into the existing Department reports and generated on a quarterly basis. Phase II. OF THE GENERAL SERVICES INFORMATION PROGRAM Staff recommends that the originally proposed Phase II through Phase III be combined into Phase II of this proposal. Staff is currently investigating and evaluating ideas for the second phase of the Public Information.Program. This phase will encompass the remaining areas of the Department which includes: Citations, Animal Control, Data Processing and Communications. A copy of the original proposal is included in the background material for review and information. Staff will formally present the recommended items for Phase II of the G.S. Program to Council by August of 1991. In conjunction with Phase II of the General Services Department program, existing programs will be expanded and additional programs will be explored to enhance the public's communication with, and awareness of, all City departments. Programs under consideration include: information inserts in license renewals; maps of City, City Hall and other general information available at an information center in the Council foyer; publication of the Council agenda in the local paper; Commission schedules made available; including a City Hall phone directory in the Recreation Brochure/Newsletter; and, a City Hall open house among others. Many of these ideas were developed from a meeting between staff and Councilmember Midstokke. Planned Date For Implementation: To commence as of January 1, 1991. Respectfully submitted: c... Henry L Staten General Services Coordinator Concur: Cy'thia Wilson General Services Director Lif Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Kevin B. North. aft City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director CURRENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (subject to revision) General Guidelines: 1. "When in doubt, don't If you are unsure of the type of violation or if there is a question in your mind, as to • whether or not a vehicle should be cited, don't issue a citation. It should be evident that there is a clear-cut violation, before a citation is issued. • 2. Sidewalk violations - The City Council has directed that •" where there is a.clearly defined sidewalk and a vehicle is parked so as to not allow 3' for pedestrian access, that vehicle should be cited ". • 3. Alleys - All vehicles are to be parked within the red lines, adjacent to the private property. 4. When marking .vehicles for seventy-two hours, the chalk marks. must be on the tread and not on the sidewall of the tire. 5. Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, Section 19-92 states No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle .for•any purpose other than the loading or unloading of persons or material in any alley fifteen feet or less in width." To maintain conformity, our rule of thumb is to allow fifteen minutes for the purpose of loading or. unloading, ie. groceries, tools, etc. This is usually indicated, by the _owner of the vehicle, when they activate their vehicle emergency flashers, to alert the enforcement officer that they are loading or unloading. .However, this is not a requirement. Technically, unless the vehicle owner is present, there is no way of knowing that the vehicle is parked for this purpose. In the interest of justice, the enforcement officer is to chalk any vehicle that is parked in the alley and return in fifteen minutes to see if the vehicle has been moved. If not, the vehicle is to .be cited. Referrals/Backup: 1. Officers shall make every attempt to resolve problems in the field. However, when it becomes necessary, contact the supervisor on duty or the senior officer, if the supervisor is not available. 2. If a situation becomes hostile, you should: a. Call your supervisor and/or radio for a police backup b. If neither are available, leave the scene. 3. Requests for citation dismissals should be referred to the'. Administrative Hearing Officer. At no time, should dismissals be referred to City Hall, the Director of the Department or other staff personnel. . Exception: See section re. Discretion. • 4. Citizens who wish to file a complaint regarding an officer should be advised to send a formal letter of complaint to the General Services Director. 5. Citizens who wish to file a complaint regarding department policy should be advised to send a formal letter of complaint to the General Services Director. 6. Citizens who wish to complain regarding meter problems should be referred to Base #3, so that a meter repair work order may be filled out. T. -Citizens who wish to complain regarding street signs,' curb markings, etc., should be referred to the Public Works Department. 8. Citizens who wish to complain regarding City Ordinances should be directed to send a formal letter of complaint to. the attention of the City Manager.: General Services Department Image Enhancement A. Discretion: Existing Policies and procedures. 1) Officers are permitted to cancel their own citations in the field with respect to non -safety violations under the following circumstances: a. When the citizen is on the scene and in the officer's opinion it would best serve justice if the citation were canceled. The citation will be canceled and a note written on the Request for Dismissal form "Per Officer's Discretion". b. In situations where a driver has gone into a store to get change, and returns with change for the meter. .. c. Where it is not immediately obvious that the vehicle is inoperable, and it is brought to the officer's attention (i.e. flat tire, dead battery, etc.). These citations are to be canceled, with the explanation "Per Officer's Discretion" on the above mentioned request form. d. In any other circumstance where, in the officer's judgement, the problem can be resolved and the cancellation of the citation is appropriate (i.e. difference in watches/clock time etc.). BacHcRavND N4TER/41 March 5th, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Member's City Council Meeting 6f of the City Council March 13th, 1990 GENERAL SERVICES PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM, Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve the expenditure of the appropriated funds to initiate the first phase of the Public Information Program for the General Services Department. The initial cost will be $8,770 dollars which includes: ads; posters; a twenty page booklet on Parking Enforcement ($6,000), Training ($200.00); and a Uniform Change ($2,570.00). Phase I also includes some policy and procedure changes. 44400 Background: At their regularly scheduled meeting of October 24th, 1989 - Council approved in concept the Public Information Program. Council at that time requested staff to indicate how the appropriations requested were to be spent. Analysis: The first phase of the program targets parking enforcement, and includes implementation of some policy and procedure changes, designed to improve the image of the Department and its personnel. These changes include a much broader use of discretion by the officers in dismissing their own citations; encouraged citizen feedback; officer training; and a change in uniform, to reshape the perception of the officer from that of being merely an enforcer. Phase I of the public information program "Parking Enforcement" will consist of; 1) Ads in the local newspapers and the city newsletter; 2) Posters to be place in public places, including the City Hall complexes; and, 3) An information booklet to be distributed to citizens of the community. The booklets will also be located in public places and accessed as needed. 4) In-house training (Citizen as Customer); 5) New Policies and Procedures, and increased Officer accountability. Advertisement has been very successful in several cities, and the attached copies of promotions are examples of situations that could be the subject matter for our posters. These ads were put together by high-priced advertising firms, and it would not be advisable to plagiarize them. The sample ads will be distributed to the General Services personnel as part of a contest to enter ideas for an ad campaign. A competition will be held, and employee recognition given for the ideas chosen. The attached booklet "A Guide: The Do's and Don'ts of parking in Hermosa Beach", wil,L be updated and new information added. Cost break down included. APPROACH/TIMETABLE: To commence as soon as training is completed, and the posters and revised booklets are received. Respectfully subm'tted: Heniy L. St ten Acting General Services Director CONCUR: evin B. Northdraft City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: 'Viki Copeland, Finance Director Improving the Image Phase I A. Discretion: New Policies and procedures. 1. Officers are permitted,<to, dismiss their own citations in the field under the following circumstances: a. When the citizen is on the scene and in the Officer's opinion it would best serve public relations if he/she dismissed the citation (Citation is dismissed and a note written on the back indicating "in the best interest of P.R.") b. In situations, where a driver has gone into a store to get change, is prepared to feed the meter and does. so. c. When it is not obvious that the vehicle is inoperable, and it is brought to the Officers' attention, i.e., flat tire, dead battery, etc. (those citations are to be dismissed, with the explanation "in the best interest of P.R. written on rear of the citation). d. In a i uat on veil' 1= by th cor ec e bl•cki the s terest of whey he -m.val . •he op= a►or •f t e v- is e 'il ob.em i. ., .n e a 1- s, ewa k etc. ote th R.). e. In any other circumstance where, in the. officer's judgement, the best interest of justice will be served and or the problem will be resolved by the dismissal of a citation. i.e., differences in watch/clock time; (note: in the interest of good P.R.) The current Standard Operating Policies and Procedures, will be reviewed and revised, based on feedback from staff; the Officers; the citizenry; and the City Council, in an effort to eliminate unfair or iniquitous enforcement. B. Citizen Feedback: a. Supervisors will create form to be used to encourage and aid Citizen comments and participation. b.. Citizen comments and or complaints will be evaluated and if appropriate, used to determine if there is a need to adjust the department's policies and/or procedures. c. If needed, a Task Force can be organized to deal with certain specific problems and make recommendations (Task Force to consist of Supervisor(s), Officer(s), member(s) from Business Community, Resident(s) Note: Please remember, that is it far better to have a vehicle move from a problem area, than to have it sit there all day with a citation on it's window. However, these policies are not intended to allow constant violators and or those who would wait for the officers to appear before obeying the law, to go without citation(s). Cost and recommendations for implementation of'the Public Information Program: TRAINING 1. Staff recommends that the Public Information Program start with training our General Services Officers. Training to commence when appropriate materials are received. The goal of the training program: a. To make the Officer knowledgeable of the objectives (The Citizen as Customer/the new policies and procedures). b. To explain the individual officers' responsibility for the success of the program. c. To give specific instructions to the officers in so far as our expectations of him/her (making surethat our Officers know that they will be held accountable for their actions). That they will also be rewarded for sustained high quality performance Z. The initial cost of training will be approximately $200.00 Statistics shall be maintained to evaluated the effectiveness of the program. UNIFORM CHANGE 1. Staff,recommends that there be a change in the color of the uniform. Uniform change to commence after the appropriate training is complete. The goal of the change in uniform: a. To change the perception of the officer as an enforcer. b. To get the officer to change his perception of what he has to do to get his job done. c. To help the Officer feel better about the job he/she has to perform. 2. The cost of the change in uniform is: $2,570.00 3. Cost breakdown included in an attached report from the personnel department. The uniform that is being proposed is a uniform that is used in many surrounding communities. Staff recommends a change from Tan shirt and Dark Brown trousers to a Light Blue Shirt and Dark/Navy blue Trousers, with a Dark Blue/Navy Jacket. Staff also recommends that the sleeve patches be changed to reflect the right color coordination. A change in the title of the position to Community Services Officer is being considered, and if implemented, should be indicated on the patches. Cost savings, if any, from this change in uniform, cannot be determined at this time. One plan under consideration, is to keep the existing shirt, and change the pants. This would reduce the cost by approximately $580.00. PARKING ENFORCEMENT POLICIES Responsibility: 1. To enforce California Vehicle and Hermosa Beach Municipal Codes, as they pertain to parking violations. 2. To enforce all codes equitably, consistently, and without prejudice or favoritism. 3. To enforce all "clearly defined violations" observed. • 4. To completely cover your assigned area in a consistent manner, and not concentrate your effort only in areas where there are more violations. 5. To be courteous, civil and respectful to all persons. Avoid answering questions in a short, abrupt manner. Try to maintain a cheerful attitude, regardless of the provo- cation. Remain cool and collected at all times. Refrain from -harsh, violent, coarse, profane, sarcastic or insolent language. (R3.10 - G. S. Rules and Regs) 6,. -.Be attentive to reports and complaints by citizens and either give them personal attention or refer them to the proper person or agency. (R4.02 - G.S. Rules and Regs) • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 'MEMORANDUM February 15, 1990 TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager FROM: Robert A. Blackwood, Personnel Director SUBJECT: General Service Officers' Uniforms The cost of changing the color of the current G.S. Officers' uni- forms would be $2,570.00. this assumes a complete change which includes: 3 uniform shirts. (one long sleeve; two short sleeve); two pair pants; one jacket; and new patches. The total number of officers to be outfitted is 9 (seven o ficers; 3 supervisors). Supervisor Lee has indicated to me that one plan that has been considered is. to keep the existing shirt and change the pants, jacket and patches. If this were done the cost would be reduced to $1,988.80. His proposal changes the color of the pants and jacket to an olive drab. While this would not "soften" the image of the of- ficers to the public, in Melvin's opinion this change would im- pact on the self-image of the officer and, hopefully, increase his professionalism. cc: L. Staten MEMO FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT TO: Robert Blackwood, Personnel Director FROM: Peggy Dunn, Municipal Intern DATE: February 15, 1990 SUBJECT: General Services Uniform Pricing ***************************************************************** The pricing to completely outfit 9 officers and 3 supervisors is as follows: PATCHES quantity of 165 = $2.22-$2.45 = approx. $366.30-$404.25 quantity of 335 = $1.64-$1.88 = approx. $549.40-$629.80 SHIRTS long sleeved - $17.50 each x 12 = $210.00 short sleeved - $15.50 each x 24 (2 each) = $372.00 PANTS class B - $15.00 each x 24 (2 each) _ $360.00 JACKETS $89.95 x 12 = $1,079.40 TOTAL $2,021.40 (to completely outfit 12) (/),s70 roc NES.) &ITC e October 2, 1.989 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council October 24, 1989 PROPOSAL FOR GENERAL SERVICES PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council (1) approve the proposal for the General Services Public Information Program, Phases I and II, for fiscal year 1989/90, (2) appropriate $6,000 from the Parking Fund to the P.E. Contract Services Account and $4,000 from the Crossing Guard Fund to the C.G. Contract Services Account to finance these projects and (3) direct staff to budget Phases III and IV in the 1990/91 Fiscal Year Budget. Background: As part of Department Head Goals and Objectives, for fiscal year 1989/90, City Manager Northcraft requested that Director Noon present new ideas for public relations efforts for the General Services Department. Subsequently, in a memo dated August 22, 1989, the General Services Director submitted the following; Animal Control: This is an area that is easy to get into. So much can be done to improve public relations in animal control. Unfortunately, over the years, it has taken a back seat due to the demands for parking enforcement and the ensuing revenue connected with same. Our efforts in this area were comprised of instructional presentations in the schools and an annual pet show. While both were successful, interest in these programs waned. In retrospect, I attribute this to lack of money and personnel. It was not a case of a concerted, budgeted effort but rather "fit it into your schedule with existing funds". At some point in time, other priorities prevailed. We were privileged to participate in a Los Angeles County Animal Control study, entitled Improving Animal Control, a few years ago. Several excellent ideas were generated as a result of this study and active participation by cities, humane organizations, vendors, etc. Endorsed recommendations include; - Radio and TV - Public Service Announcements 'could be used to inform and educate. (Since we are closely connected with the local cable network it couldprobably be arranged easily). - Quarterly Newsletter or Magazine. (With the 'advent of • desk -top publishing, this is a. realistic approach). Education in Schools - We have already had some experience in this area. We currently have two films available albeit they may be somewhat outdated. However, there are many more out there if we are willing to invest the money. - Positive Image Campaign - Animal Control Officers as "good guys " ; a) Rename Animal Control to Animal Rescue — Print on all vehicles, forms, applications, licenses, etc. b) Produce video tapes that portray the Animal Control Officer as a helper and rescuer, i.e. an officer stopping traffic to help an injured animal, placing the animal on a stretcher and taking to vet, sub- sequently calling the owner to let them know what has happened. c) A program in which animal control officers give "RPO" (responsible pet owner) buttons to pet owners walking their dogs on leashes, carrying pooper scoopers, etc. - Mall/Fiesta Exhibits; Booths could be set up to hand out information, brochures, rules and regulations, etc. A plus could be to distribute pet food, flea collars, leashes,etc. (donated by vendors). - Annual Pet Shows; This has proven to be a big hit with the community, both owners (mostly children) and their parents.' In the past, no one was a loser because we had a prize for every imaginable category. Cable TV: Public relations in this area has to be a cooperative effort between the city and the cable company. I. think we have. made some strides to date via the community survey, Cable TV Board, etc. Information dissemination will become more efficient through our direct communication to the character generator. This will enable the City to release immediate information dealing with a variety of subjects from the urgent to the mundane, as well as displaying the agendas for both City Council and Planning Commission meetings. Through cooperation, question and answer programs, documentaries, etc. could benefit the community considerably. Crossing Guards: This is an area that we never considered in promoting public relations, but it is an important one. While we have responded to concerns and complaints, of both parents and the school district, we have never conducted a pro -active campaign. It would be very beneficial to meet with the PTO, both prior to and during the school year, to determine if the City is meeting their needs and to solicit input on how to improve service. There is a need for education in this area. We have found that many times the children (and sometimes their parents) do not follow the safe route to school, thereby placing themselves in potential danger. In addition to giving a presentation, in the schools and at PTO meetings, a coloring book could be designed to encourage the saferoute to school. Parking Enforcement: This is a tough one! Parking Enforcement is one of those areas where "you're damned if you do and damned if you don't". One of the efforts to date has been to publish a brochure, A guide: The Do's and Don'ts of. Parking in Hermosa Beach. Also, the Hearing Officer Program has been an added plus to public relations. We had a video produced promoting parking permits, which we aired on cable TV. Finally, a poster, warning against blocking the sidewalk {when this was a big issue), was distributed throughout town as well as used in a half page ad in the Easy Reader. Advertisement has been very successful in several cities. We have attached copies of promotions that have been used. Since these ad campaigns were put together by high priced advertising firms, it would not be advisable to plagiarise them. It could be a boost to morale if the employees, of the General Services Department, were solicited to enter ideas for an ad campaign, based on the same principles. A competition could be held with awards and employee recognition given for those ideas chosen. This could then be extended to include other ideas that could promote public relations in the field of parking enforcement. ***************************************************************** It must be realized that any attempt, to increase public relations efforts, will require a commitment on the part of the City Council and the Administration to dedicate funds and personnel to accomplish the task. ***************************************************************** Upon receipt of the above recommendations, City Manager Northcraft directed that an agenda item be preparedfor the City Council to include a timetable and funding. He further stated that his emphasis is first on parking enforcement and safe route to school, with the others to follow. Analysis: Staff recognizes that, while ideas may come easily, actual implementation is more time consuming and costly. Therefore, we are proposing a four phase plan as follows; Phase I - Parking Enforcement Ad Campaign - Implement 89/90 - Commence Immediately - Approximate Cost/$6,000 (includes newspaper ads). Approach/Timetable: 3 F 1. Distribute sample ads. to General Services personnel, asking for ideas to be submitted by December 1st., to include photo (black & white) and caption. 2. Establish panel of judges, prior to December 1st. Should include persons (possibly solicited from the community or newspaper) with graphics background. 3. Choose winners and present awards by first City Council meeting in January. 4. Go to bid for graphics firm to perform set-up for ads and posters, first week in January. 5. Award bid, second City Council meeting in February. 6. Commence campaign April 1, 1990.. Depending upon the number of entries chosen, city could promote on a monthly, quarterly or bi-annual basis. Promotion to include ads in local newspapers'as well as posters to be distributed throughout. city buildings, public library, post office, markets, etc. Phase II - Safe Route to School Campaign - Implement 89/90 - Commence Immediately - Approximate Cost/$4,000 Approach/Timetable: 1. General Services Coordinator and/or Supervisors schedule a meeting with PTO second week in November of 1989 to get parent -and teacher reaction and input on the new program as well as address any concerns they may have. 2. Prepare a request for proposal for the design and printing of a coloring book depicting the benefits of following a safe route to school and the dangers involved in disregarding said route, the first week in February. 3. Award of bid, first City Council meeting in May. 4. Make arrangements with School District (may wish to include private schools in city as well) to make presentation to school children during the month of October 90. At this time the coloring books could be distributed. It would be better to commence this effort at the beginning of the school year.' 5. General Services Coordinator and/or Supervisors will schedule a follow-up meeting with the PTO sometime in. November of 1990. Phase III - Cable TV Effort - Implement 1990 - Approximate Cost/ Effort has already commenced on this program. We have made arrangements with MultiVisions to have direct access to the character generator and the necessary equipment has been ordered. Further planning in this area should be left up to whomever is assigned the responsibility for Cable TV. Phase IV - Animal Control Campaign - Implement 1990/91 - Approximate Cost/ . This is a very ambitious campaign and will require more dedication of personnel. It is advisable to hold this program in abeyance until the General Services Department reorganization has been completed and the dust has settled. The proposed budget for Phases I and II are ball -park figures based upon estimate provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The timetable estimates are based upon personal experience in preparing projects for the City of Hermosa Beach. Joan Noon General Services Director Noted for fiscal impact: ina Copeland Finance Finance Director Revin B. Nor-Oidraft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Since this program does not directly relate to our current goals, an option would be to defer until our goal review in December, 1989. However, the proposals seem very responsive to Council and citizen complaints. By.starting with these proposals now, we can initiate what we hope will become a citywide "Citizen as Customer" theme. Such a theme would be designed to.improve the quality of contacts with citizens, and the citizens' view of their City. RESERVED METERED PARKING L 1•• aL'V ,*r; rte. . 4 —$7, .•.1.:. _.=h3:itwiik f5�, 2i�•:� r7:.t• 1gtic �a '.•- tri ?J ri•"f "�- s'r+Yv� • ..xa'11,T,1a.•'v.R'?`^1 C1.� R`yi M'4,i.. a' ,,,„, ,,,,,, ,--.,7,,r,,. �;.,.rr 13-yew;w.F.2; :i•. .-''.: �,1:: ; s ;:,,,,,..---:;2_,,,,..,-- ?..V s . ,"' ..JL' ka..�� '4'� ai!i Y..v.. �� 57`f,.ts..... �. Z c;' 3'i rm,'� ;:.F. ,zcr . ''rrr nom.,-;..7...A.1?.r...-�_^3: `s'.. ,,;.e...a.cpas+ncs:•.. ;lT..,�.v:.Y.'v.. . • KaL..h i.r air �....�.�.,,��..yyyy►�.I'++ ..ws+� �.pwawtrr�+n'°',+i?l.-{ Y'{:y e•a.v:•••: �.: • •%44V1:10-0,741'�• 4:+4�/ {, L• .4� n �•h. l +kf • • • }+� •�y1•l`•,elC 'ire {� :. .1'S -$''.4t< -3.;13P -&1.4-4-:.f �li- • d'_ ti •rr;:•:•.v •l`'�,: - �•'sc '! A ..c il.� cl '+a. Je G• leatO \taking life tough for a few selfish dri". ers can make life a lot easier for the rest of us. it's a • thankless job. But parking personnel help stop the violators who park where they shouldn't. or who exceed their time limit so you can't park at all. Enforcement also helps traffic flow 'smoothly. and keeps streets open so emer- •. vehicles arent brought to a dead stop. -\ 'e're cracking down on lawbreakers open • 4) space for us all. ILLEGAL PARMG COSTS EVERYONE. C . l �l t 1 ' `I til1-+•gi17 • -.en1. 1 v•.r • .%:. t11r4 •• •t.+. <'ai':i�'r�•: y&?Fr'S�::.x.: is A parking violator commits a careless act. An ambulance is delayed. A life is lost. There's oni, one wa, to prevent it. Enforce the law. That's what our parking management program is doing. les making sure the actions of a selfish few aren't allowed to jeopardize the safety of us all. Sea we're writing tickets and 10%1 ing cars tV 're Waking life tough for lawbreakersbe- cause the rest of us can afford to be brought to a dead stop. .LLEGAL FAIMING COSTS EVERME. • A nu55.;e trc m ti.c• City, ti .tsv t r;e.tn. Parking Dnision EtMonal. ta% :i •.t- -40 � L-4 L` ..! c4v'+.• i `+1� .'. .,'•ac!` i(: ew.tr a'r•-"t:1yr,1.1elfZiti-V1 11:"atz :7?.20• .4.j-iC ( af~E- t, M IA DRIVEWAY There ever\ :\ here Blocking your drivewv,1%. Obstructing traf t!c. Making life difficult. Tire\ • Ignore the parkirIg regulations most people obey. But we're doing something about itour parking management program is enforcing . the law. Making pure parking violators gist `What they deserve. That's bad news fnr tliert;' But it's .!rt_at i1et�', for the rust of u' t 7 5. because • theres no room, in our cite for space invaders. +�C1�.f�$' Ift.N 1 SIN C a d tt':." l.lfil•!: I°.if ; �• • t.c_. ,._ •.:;.s�-.a+t..•a'`•'-3:- .. t It�i�tf.�r.: t,..2'A �ti.f1.11. :1+f DID YOU K W THIS IS WRONG? Although we are aware of the parking problems in. Hermosa Beach, Pedestrians have rights too! The City asks that you do not block the sidewalks. This is a violation of California Vehicle Code 22500F. City of Hermosa Beach 4211 ER 3-29-84 HB314A September 26, 1989 Mr. Al Fuentes Member Services S.C.A.G. 818 West 7th Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dear Mr. Fuentes, City of 2lermosa 13each.,. Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Thank you for your prompt response to our request for a cost estimate to produce public information materials. This matter is scheduled to be before the City Council at their meeting of October 24, 1989. I will not be able to see this project through since I will be retiring at the end of October. However, I am turning the project over to my Administrative Aide, Michele Tercero. She will be contacting you regarding the City Council's decision in this matter and what, if any, action is to be undertaken. If you have any questions, you may reach her at (213) 318-0257. I have been requested by our Public Works Director, Anthony Antich, to inquire if you have a brochure which outlines the services offered by your group. He was very impressed with the assistance you have provided to our department. If such is available, please forward to either Mr. Antich or myself. Once again, thank you for all your help. It has been a pleasure working with your organization. Sincerely, oan Noon General Services Director cc: Anthony Antich, Public Works Director / Michele Tercero, Administrative Aide / S City ofHermosa 1r3each.) September.5, 1989 Mr. Al Fuentes Member Services S.C.A.G. 818 West 7th Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dear Mr. Fuentes, Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 The City of Hermosa Beach is once again seeking your assistance in public relations efforts. If you recall, a couple of years ago, your organization designed, edited and printed a brochure entitled The DOs and DON'Ts of Parking in Hermosa Beach, as a contract service. At this point, we are in the planning stages and need a cost estimate for two projects we are considering. The first project under consideration is an ad and poster campaign depicting the benefit of parking enforcement. I have attached copies of material used by the City of New Orleans, LA. To help bolster morale, among our civilian personnel enforcing parking regulations, we are suggesting that a competition be held whereby the officers would submit black and white photographs along with appropriate captions. Those ideas chosen would be used in the campaign and service awards would be given to the employees submitting the ideas. We would need a cost estimate for camera ready set up;. editing; printing of approximately one hundred posters for each idea chosen; and suggested ad size and cost. For planning purposes; let us assume we would use four (one each quarter) different subjects. The second project is a coloring book depicting the benefit of following the "safe route to school" and the potential danger of not doing so. This project would be from scratch, we don't have any idea on how to proceed. We have a small school district, approximately seven hundred students K through 8th grade. We would need ball. park costs from design to printing. a1d We are scheduled to present these proposals to the City Council at their second meeting in October therefore, we would like to get approximate cost as soon as possible. We would need separate costs for each project with as much breakdown as possible. We greatly appreciate any help you can give us in this matter. If you have any question or need further information, please contact my office (213) 318-0257. Sincerely, Noon General Services Director an • IOUTHERA CALIFORn1A AffOCIATIOf OF GOVERfl EfTf - 818 West Seventh Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Li (213) 236-1800 FAX (213) 236-1825 September 19, 1989 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE President Mike Antonovich, Supervisor, . Los Angeles County First Vice President Christine Reed, Councilmember. Santa Monica Second Vice President John Flynn. Supervisor Ventura County Past President Don Griffin, Councilmember, Buena Park Imperial County Abe Seabolt, Supervisor Los Angeles County Deane Dana, Supervisor Orange County Harriett Wieder, Supervisor Riverside County Kay Ceniceros, Supervisor San Bernardino County Jon Mikels, Supervisor Cities of Imperial County (To be tilled) City of Los Angeles Tom Bradley, Mayor Los Angeles Gloria Molina. Councilmember, Los Angeles Robert Farrell. Councilmember, Los Angeles City of Long Beach Clarence Smith. Couucibnember. Long Beach Cities of Riverside County Jack Clarke. Councilmember, Riverside Cities of San Bernardino County John L.ongsille, Mayor Rialto Cities of Ventura County John Melton. Councilmember. Santa Paula Cities of Orange County Irwin Fried. Coucihne,nb r, Yorba Linda AT -LARGE DFLEGATFS Jacki Bacharach, Mayor, Rancho Palos Verdes Robert Gentry. Mayor, Laguna Beach Judy Nieburger, Couneilmember, Moreno Valley ALTERNATES Ms. Joan Noon General Services Director City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center -1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Dear Ms. Noon: I;t was indeed a pleasure to hear from you again. It demonstrated to us at SCAG that our Member Fee Services Program is of value to our member cities. In response to your request for a cost estimate to produce some parking enforcement materials, the following is provided: a) AD: 11 1/2" x 14" Artwork and Production $750. Typesetting 175. total $950. b) POSTERS (3): 12" X 18"; 100 lb. glossy book paper stock; (2) colors -black & 1 PMS color; 100 copies Artwork and Production $1,425. Typesetting 300. Printing (100 copies each) 1,050. total $2,775. c) BOOKLET: 5 1/2" x 8 1/2" 10 sheets of 8 1/2" x 11" folded = 20 pages plus the cover; 1 color Artwork and Production $1,825. Typesetting 300. Printing (300 copies) 850. total $2,975. If you want SCAG to proceed with this service, please provide us with a production schedule as soon as possible. Thank you again with the opportunity to provide a service to the City of Hermosa Beach. Al Fuentes Member Services • Imperial County o Jeanie Vogel. Supervisor • Los Angeles County o Edmund Edelman, Supervisor and Peter Schabarum. Supervisor • Orange County o Gaddi Vasquez, Supervisor . Riverside County o Melba Dunlap; Supervisor • San Bernardino County o Larry 1Valker. Supervisor . Ventura County o James Dougherty, Supervisor • Cities of Imperial County o Ron Rodriguez, Councilmember, Westmoreland • Cities of Los Angeles County o Vacant • Cities of Riverside County • Richard Deininger, Jr., Mayor, Corona • Cities of Orange County o John Kanal. Mayor Pro Tern Cypress • Cities of San Bernardino County o Larry Rhinhart, Mayor Montclair • Cities of Ventura County o Frank McDevitt, Councilmember. Ojai o Richard Alatorre, Councilmember. Los Angeles • Michael Woo. Councilmember, Los Angeles • Joy Picus, Councilmember. Los Angeles • Long Beach 2nd Position Vacant • Vicki Howard, Councibnemher, Simi Valley • Robert Bartlett, Mayor. Monrovia • Ruthelyn Plummer, Mayor Pm Tem, Newport Beach 4 - • TO: Kevin B. Northcraft FROM: Henry L Staten RE: Parking Policies/Meter Installation DATE: April 23rd, 1990 nnmmunnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnminnnnnnnnnnnnmium umm PROGRESS REPORT ON NEW PARKING PROGRAM Since the inception of the new parking policies we have monitored the number of citations written and the number of citations dismissed. I took the information from a week in April to give you an idea of how the program is working. The following statistics are the results of the period surveyed between April•t6th, thru April 22nd, 1990 April 16th, 1990 193/14 Mon. April 17th, 1990 185/16 Tue. April 18th, 1990 226/22 Wed. April 19th, 1990 130/17 Thurs. April 20th, 1990 106/9 Fri. April 21st, 1990 239/15 Sat. April 22nd, 1990 235/10 Sun.. The new parking policies are having an affect in at least two areas: - when contacted by the citizen the cite is dismissed in most cases. Effect; increase in the number of citations dismissed. - when the citizen is on the scene, the citation is usually never written. Effect; decrease in the number of citations written. There are two California Vehicle Codes sections that we must carefully adhere to, C.V.C. 40202 and 40215. I will make sure to incorporate these sections into our new policies. We will keep monitoring the progress of the program. P.O.M. METERS TO BE REPLACED There are 734 P.O.M. meters that need to be replaced because of Vandalism problems, etc. .We have received and are currently installing 220 Duncans. We have set up a five year plan for completion of this project. First year Second year Third year Fourth year fifth year 220 100 100 157 157 Total 734 I put the larger amounts last in anticipation that our financial picture will be better at that time. ••4ee map), you may buy an annual PARKING PERMIT, which allows parking with minimal restriction. The cost of the permit is $20. Contact the General Services Department. Residents can buy annual Parking Permits (one permit per vehicle registered locally) that allow drivers to park at yellow pole meters without paying the meter or observing the one- hour -limit restriction. Employees working in Hermosa Beach can also buy such permits. Visitors to Hermosa Beach can buy a one -day version of this permit. NOTE: this permit does NOT allow a vehicle to be parked during the days and hours posted "No Parking;' nor can anyone park for more than 72 hours at one location. Residents can buy a Guest Parking Permit (one per house- hold) for the use of visiting friends. WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU BREAK A LAW? You can be cited and fined. Your car could be towed away. If you have five or more outstanding parking citations, a wheel of your car may be equipped with a device called a "Denver Boot;' which makes driving impossible, for a period of up to 72 hours. (This method of impoundment at least saves you the expense of paying towing charges.) After 72 hours—or if the boot does not fit the wheel of the offending car, or if the vehicle is parked so as to endanger public safety—the car will be towed. If your car is booted or towed, you must either pay the cita- tion or post bail and arrange a court date. To get your car back, contact the General Services Department at City Hall (in the basement of the building). If General Services is closed, the Police Department (540 Pier Avenue, 376-7981) can help you. If you think that you were unfairly cited, or that your car was unfairly impounded, you can contest the action. An Administrative Hearing officer can hear your citation complaint. (This saves you time—weeks spent waiting for a court date and then hours in traffic court.) The decision of the hearing officer is based on the legal and technical aspects of the case, as well as any mitigating circumstances. Hearing hours are Tuesday afternoons from 1:00 to 4:00, and Thursday evenings from 5:00 to 9:00, excluding holi- days. The hearings are held in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 1315 Valley Drive. If you disagree with the hearing officer's decision, you may contest the citation at South Bay Municipal Court. You will have to post bail in the General Services Department of City Hall, and a court date will be arranged. If you want to contest the impounding of your vehicle, re- quest a hearing within ten days of the date on your Notice of Impound. Contact the Hermosa Beach Police Department by phone, letter, or in person. If you win your case, the City will be responsible for the towing and storage costs. esea aells a bees sae ell all elle a see oe bee Se•591.8* OS We hope you'll always find a convenient parking space. We're glad to have you visit our city, and we mean it when we say WELCOME TO HERMOSA BEACH ! CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 (213) 376-6984 A GUIDE: AND OF PARKING IN Hermosa Beach CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Hermosa Beach is a friendly city, and we welco'tb-+rsit.Rs. But we're small—only 1.3 square miles of land area—and 20,000 people live here year-round. When we have 100,000 visitors, as often happens on weekends and holidays, then we have parking problems—particularly near the beach, in what we call the "impacted area: So we must have parking rules. RESTRICTED BEACH PARKING READ METERS and,;, SIGNS mi Go Shopping!!! z MERCHANT a VALIDATED PARKING. IN LOTS HIGHWAY PACIFIC COAST m CCEENTER COMMUNITY ARDMORg AVENUE Police i -LIBRARY VALLEY DRIVE J CI1Y=HALL ,MONTEREY. BOULEVARD; HAMBERofCOMMERCE$9G HERMO otl�i3 1 A IimA-%4m ND WALKWAY> BIICE<PATHsS ACK FRONT -AREA' sLt,F GUARD DQ W PIER The Impacted Area lies between the north and south borders of the city, and extends from the beach on the west to Loma and Morningside Drives on the east. We've tried to be fair to everyone in writing our parking rules. We believe we have been. And we think it's fair to warn you that our parking laws are strictly enforced. We'll tell you first of all where you may NOT park. That way, you can avoid the inconvenience and expense of being ticketed or towed. DON'T PARK: • In ALLEYS, except in marked parking stalls. Vehicles load- ing and unloading may park for 15 minutes, but their flashers must be on. (Residents whose garages face onto the alley may, of course, park on their own property be- hind the red lines.) • ANYPLACE during the hours when the signs indicate No Parking. We need those hours to clean and maintain streets. (Commercial vehicles may park just long enough to make pickups or deliveries.) • WHERE YOU BLOCK SOMEBODY'S DRIVEWAY, either by being in it or in front of it. Exception: if it's a driveway that you own or lease, you can park in front of it if you have a permitfrom the General Services Department at City Hall. • TiVigrmit, in effect for as long as you own, rent, or lease the property, costs $27.50. • On the SIDEWALK, or on the PARKWAY AREA (usually grass or brick) between the sidewalk and the curb. Note: even if you're parked in your own driveway, make sure your vehicle doesn't block the sidewalk. You must leave three feet of unobstructed clearance for pedestrians, or your vehicle can be ticketed. • In HANDICAPPED spaces, unless your vehicle displays a "disabled person" license or official placard. These spaces are marked by BLUE PAINT on the curb or edge of the paved portion of the street, or by signs. • In RED ZONES, ever. Pay careful attention to the paint on the curb. • In YELLOW ZONES, usually. These are for loading or unloading goods (commercial vehicles, 20 -minute limit; passenger vehicles, 3 -minute limit). This rule is enforced between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m., Monday through Saturday; it isnot enforced on Sundays and holidays. • In WHITE ZONES, usually. These are for loading or un- loading passengers (3 -minute limit) or depositing mail in mailboxes. If the white zone is in front of a hotel or mail- box, you may not park there at any time. In most other cases, the rules are enforced only between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and not at all on Sun- days and holidays. If the white zone is in front of a theater, the rules apply only when the theater is open for business. Again, please obey these rules. They will be enforced. HERE'S WHERE YOU MAY PARK: • At METERS (when paid), except during hours specified "No Parking: At poles painted yellow (these are in residential areas), parking rules are enforced 24 hours a day. At poles painted silver (these are in commercial areas), rules are not enforced during certain night and early -morning hours, usually between 8 p.m. and 9 a.m. But check the meters for exact hours. Even when you park legally at a meter during the daytime, there are limits on how long you may stay there, usually one or two hours. To give everyone an equal chance to park, these time limits are enforced. • In ONE-HOUR ZONES, with permit. • In GREEN ZONES, but only for 15 minutes. This applies between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m., every day. • There are several REMOTE PARKING LOTS where you may park free of charge. • There are THREE LOTS in the DOWNTOWN shopping area that display "Validation" signs. You may park in these for up to four hours and shop. Many stores will validate your parking ticket for the amount of time you spend in the store. You must pay the parking lot attendant for any un - validated time on your parking ticket, at the posted rate. If you live or work in the impacted area of Hermosa Beach a '_1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council r December 5, 1990 City Council Meeting of December 11, 1990 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF CONTINUOUS FORM CITATIONS FOR EVALUATION OF ELECTRONIC HAND HELD CITATION WRITERS Recommendation: lam---a-9D It is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of continuous form citations at a cost of $11,400 from the Parking Enforcement Office supplies account. The Clancy Hand Held Citation Writing System will be provided with the citation purchase. Staff will use the equipment for a four month (March - June) trial period. A formal evaluation of the system integrity will be conducted at the end of the four month period. If the evaluation is acceptable, staff will submit a recommendation to either continue the loan agreement for a period of one - three years or purchase the equipment, and purchase additional citations at the above stated price. Background: As part of the 1989-90 Budget the City Council approved $53,500 for the purchase of a Hand Held Citation Writing and Management System. This, however, was put on hold until the development of a Master Data Processing Plan for system integration, to ensure hardware and software compatibility. Analysis: Staff's recommendation is based upon the cost savings and potential increase in revenue which will result from the implementation of the proposed system. The Clancy system includes hardware, software, training, support, maintenance and automatic upgrades for a cost of $.38/cite. The analysis is divided as follows: 1. Advantages of the Hand Held Citation Writers versus the currentmanual system. 2. The Clancy proposal. 3. Other vendor proposals. 4. Cost Factors 5. Advantages of the Clancy System. 1. ADVANTAGES OF THE HAND HELD CITATION WRITERS VERSUS THE CURRENT MANUAL SYSTEM. Current System Continuous backlog Illegible citations result in approx. 27 - 5% error ratio per year Up to 90 seconds for hand written citations Hot Sheet prepared manually (a monthly report generated from a print out which list all vehicles with 10 or more citations) Storage needed for issued citations One to two people required for daily data entry Proposed System Database updated daily during off hours; No backlog Legible citation; reduction in number of errors due to printed cites Less than 30 seconds for the continuous print cites Updated Craily; retained in hand held unit (electronically) Space for one monthly print out to be stored with magnetic tape off-site as a historical record, no on-site storage of paper citations necessary. Down loaded by hand held during off city hours; no human interface required The proposed hand held citation writing system, is capable of / organizing parking citation data in a more reliable manner when compared to the manual method of citation writing. The citations will be electronically printed and therefore, fewer errors will be encountered when writing the violation numbers, dates, times, icense numbers, etc. It is expected this will result in an crease of currently lost revenue due to these errors. The \tion information is stored in the unit and uploaded into the Master Database. This eliminates manual data -entry oversights and errors. Currently, one (1) permanent employee and (1) temporary, volunteer, work ability program, senior citizen or Injured on Duty(IOD) personnel (equivalent to one person per man year), are required to maintain a ten (10) day backlog for this database alone. The use of these electronic units would eliminate the need to replace the position of a Technical Aide in the General Services Department. Reports can be generated to track the volume and types of citations issuedin a manner designated by the General Services Department. These reports include: 1. Daily activity reports (Officer report) 2. Verification of equipment check out 3. Number of cites issued 4. Location of cites issued According to the California Vehicle Code, Section 40206.5(c), ."A copy of the notice of parking violation may be a photostatic copy or an electronically produced facsimile. The Court is acquainted with these types of citation copies through use by the Cities of Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach over the past five (5) months. Staff has notified the court of the City's intent to use the electronic citation writers. A letter from the General Services Department formally advising of the change to the hand helds will be sent upon receipt of the units. The "scofflaw" identification feature of tfie Hand Held Citation Writers can also be used to assist in apprehension of habitual parking violators. The Hand Held Citation units can store a large number of scofflaw vehicle license plates in memory. Officers in the field are automatically notified when a vehicle has ten (10) or more citations outstanding. This eliminates some of the problems associated with the use of paper reports. The information provided will also be more timely and up-to-date than the current paper reporting system. When a scofflaw plate is discovered, the vehicle would be subject to being booted or towed. Recovery of these unpaid parking citation penalties would then be possible. 2. THE CLANCY PROPOSAL Implementation of the new proposal requires that the City purchase citations from Clancy at $.38 each. Staff recommends that 30,000 cites, equivalent of four month citation total, be purchased. Included with the purchase of the citations, Clancy will provide the Clancy Hand Held Citation Writing System. The system includes the following: Hardware: 1. 18 units, one for each parking control officer, plus on-site spares. 5 Charger/communication modules (4 field units in each module). One (1) PC computer with modem and cabling for system uploading and downloading of information, which will be integrated with our current system. Software: Custom software for field units and city system computer. Interface software for upload to Phoenix Group database system, used for processing of out-of-state violators. Maintenance: Maintenance for duration of the equipment usage including on-site spares/FRU's (field replacement units). Support: Support will be ongoing for the duration of the equipment usage. Training: Initial on-site training plus ongoing training by either telephone, modem, or on-site visits, as needed. Upgrades: Upgrades to hardware and software will be provided as they are available and technology changes. 3. OTHER VENDOR PROPOSALS Vendors previously contacted for the original proposal were again contacted to ascertain if they offered a program comparable to the Clancy proposal. Upon checking with those vendors, they offered the following. DOUBLE HELIX ENTERPRISE Philip Davis The number that was given is no longer in service. RADIX CORP. -'Thomas Filgo The company offers purchasing only. At this time they do not have leasing or any comparable offer. KET - Peter L. French Unavailable to contact. POLYSOFT SYSTEMS, INC. Jean Dorsey The purchase price for their system would range between $60,000 and $80,000. This does not include a maintenance contract which would be approximately 15% of the purchase price. In addition the city would need to purchase the citations which were quoted as $90.00 per thousand. Software upgrades are included with the maintenance contract. The lease program that they offer is based on a three (3) year contract. This would cost approximately $25,000-$40,000 per year depending on the application needed. The maintenance agreement is 22% of the cost. The contract offers the the option of purchasing the product at the end of the lease. At this time they do not offer the same option that the City has been offered with the Clancy system. U. S. PUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Zev Fogel Unable to contact by phone. MOTOROLA - Cisco Andrade This company is implementing a new hand held ticket writing system. The system will transmit data through radio waves and instantly update the main computer system. They have not yet established the type of purchase/lease options that will be offered. At this time they are looking at January to start selling their product. The only price that was quoted is the radio service which would be $.12 per citation. Reliability data or customer reference list for the new product is not available. TIMELAPSE INC. - Roy White No Response. ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC. - Gary Ward This company has given us three options: 1. Purchase - The cost for purchasing their system would be approximately $72,000. This cost does not include maintenance. The maintenance is free for the first year and approximately $5,900 per year there after. The installation does not include the interface between the PC and main computer -system. Upgrades are available at no charge unless labor and additional materials are needed. In addition to the price of the equipment the city would need to also purchase citations, envelopes and ribbons which would amount to approximately $5,200 per year. 2. Lease - The price of a three year lease with the option to buy would be approximately $31,200 per year. This includes maintenance for the term of the lease but does not include the interface between the PC and the main computer system. Software upgrades are included at no charge unless labor and additional materials are needed. In addition to the lease you would need to purchase citations, envelopes and ribbons which would amount to approximately $5,200 per year. 3. Purchase Service - This would include the use of all equipment with a charge of $,.15 per citation (approximately $12,000/yr). This however does not include the citations, envelopes and ribbons needed. That cost would be approximately $5,200 per year. This also would not include the interface between the PC and the main computer system. TRAFFIC DATA SYSTEMS (previously Sigma Science) —Rodger Williams They no longer carry hand held ticket writers. 4. COST FACTORS The cost for one (1) permanent employee (Technical Aide) for four (4) months, is $12,184. The cost savings the City will realize utilizing the proposed Clancy system during the trial period, is $784. Staff proposed to use existing, budgeted dollars to purchase the continuous form citations. There are no additional costs anticipated or expected during the trial period. 5. ADVANTAGES OF CLANCY SYSTEM The Clancy offer was preferred over the other vendors for the following reasons: 1. Initial capital outlay Low initial cost for trial program; $11,400 versus $53,000. 2. Service - There would not be any additional costs for maintenance and support of the system as with other vendors. _ClancyY also has an excellent reputation for service and dependability which staff considers to be superior to the other known manufacturers. A reference list of cities, businesses and organizations currently using the Clancy system is attached for review. 3. Technology - The unit and printer designs are changing every 6 - 12 months. Clancy will provide hardware and software upgrades at no additional cost. The other vendors do not provide this type of support. The risk of obsolescence is considered too high to warrant the purchase of any unit at this time. 4 Printing - The printer is a continuous, impact print. No specialized ribbons are required. There is also no "wait" time associated with the citation generation. 5. Support - The loaned system will be added to the City's existing computer support agreement with Phoenix Group Information Systems. There will be no additional cost for this service. The only draw -back to the system proposed by Clancy is the envelope supplied with the citation. The current envelopes used with the manual system we now employ are easy to open. The envelopes supplied by Clancy are of the standard, glued, closed top type, that will require some type of letter opener. The other listed vendors listed did not offer the perforated envelopes either. Installation of the Clancy system may also assist in our future plan to share information with our neighboring cities. This mutual cooperative effort could result in the apprehension of violators and the recovery of potential revenue currently lost due to parking scofflaws. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Purchase a complete hand held system including hardware, software, installation, training and upgrades. 2. Continue to maintain the current system. 3. Formal bid process. CONCUR: C'nthia Wilson General Services Director Kevin B. Northcraf City Manager Respectfully Submitted, Cynthia Wilson, General Services Director by (77 Henry L. Staten General Services Coordinator Marcia] Hite Citation Records Administrator NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Not available for signature Viki Copeland Finance Director Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 28, 1990 Regular Meeting of December 11, 1990 SUBJECT: DEVELOPING CONSENSUS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF HOUSING ELEMENT NEW POLICIES OF DEVELOPMENT -- HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HIP) INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: DESIGN A METHOD OF PROVIDING PUBLIC INPUT, PUBLIC EXPOSURE, AND GENERAL AGREEMENT REGARDING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Recommendation 1. Authorize creation of a task force program as described in the Analysis below, and provide additional funding at mid -year budget for extensive advertising. 2. Direct staff to advertise for task force applicants. Background At the joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop, and at the October 9, 1990 public hearing concern was expressed regarding providing adequate opportunity for public awareness and input to imposing new zoning standards on future development which minimally will include the following: height, density, bulk, setbacks, open space, parking and landscaping (refer to attachment for policies to be implemented). Analysis Possible Options Staff examined a variety of ways of proceeding with implementation including discussions with Manhattan Beach. The following are various methods: A. Common Technique: Hold joint workshop with Planning Commission and City Council. Have two Planning Commission public hearings and two City Council public hearings. Based on Manhattan Beach's experience, this method, probably, would be dysfunctional. B. Area Workshops: Have workshops in various geographical areas with citizens at -large. Finding locations within various areas for meetings would be difficult, except at a'home which may pose problems. Also having different residents attending different meetings would be chaotic, and would mean having to continually reiterate what is being attempted, resulting possibly in never making it past the basics, and never reaching a resolution. C. Analytic Workshops: Manhattan Beach, ultimately, conducted workshops, whereby, a property owner could, on a given evening, make an appointment to have his property in regard to, for', example, the new floor -area -ratio. standard analyzed. The result of this method was many property owners were "walk-ins" with no appointment and were told they could not be assisted that night which caused a lot of anger. Also many disclaimers had to be given because of the variety of variables which could not all be considered in the analysis. This process also resulted in a large amount of man-hours of time. D. Proposed Method: The proposed method as described below is based upon staff attendance at a consensus building seminar sponsored by the League of California Cities, and presented by Snider & Associates, an Oakland, California based agency which specializes in conducting consensus building meetings. This firm could be hired for this effort, but staff believes it could be accomplished in-house. In addition to the above technique, staff added an additional step which is to target specific areas of the community and have a workshop for,solely that particular area. However, since the City is small, City Hall is centrally located, and there may be difficulty in. finding a suitable location, the actual meeting would be held in the City Council Chamber. Residents from only the targeted area would be requested to come to the meeting for their area. Residents of each area would be given written notice Task Force After examining potential ways of developing public consensus, staff believes a task force consisting of eleven residents representing a select cross group within the community would be advantageous. Members from various committees, commissions, and residents at -large may be chosen. The task force, once formed, may be useful for other General Plan revisions such as the Land Use Element, and since the Circulation, Transportation, and Parking Element is complete, policies from that element should also be examined for implementation. Method of Selection Residents to serve on the task force should be selected by the City Council. However, the staff recommended method of selecting the task force members would be to advertise for applicants, and the applicants chosen to serve would be essentially picked based on geographical location so that all areas of the City would be represented. In addition, architects in the community would be invited to participate in the discussion. Networking Those individuals selected to be on the task force would be requested to notify at least five persons within their area and invite them to the meetings; those five in turn would be encouraged to invite five others and so on. By networking, more residents will be informed about the workshops. Method of Approach The following lists the approach which will be taken: 1. An unbiased facilitator will be needed. Someone in-house, but remote from the Planning Department with experience in group dynamics (such as the Personnel Director). 2. A technical advisor aware of the current ordinances will be needed (Planning Director). 3. Orientation and get acquainted meeting will be conducted to accomplish the following: a. Clarify the problem b. Clarify the task c. Clarify they are in an advisory role to Planning Commission and City Council d. Make sure everyone gets acquainted 1) Beverages and food (reasonable quality) should be served. 4. Agenda will be prepared for each meeting. 5. Time of meetings will be set to be convenient to the task force. Ending time will also be set. i Diagrams will be prepared and slides will'be used to provide understanding of the issues involved. Also butcher block paper and a chalk board will be used to add in developing ideas, concepts, etc. 7. Proposed changes to ordinance will be provided as a point of discussion. 8. Information will be provided in oral and written form, and creative alternatives suggested and solicited. 9. A limited number of meetings will be held, and if an unanimous decision on each item cannot be rendered, then a majority and a minority opinion will be prepared for each item. Final Step Once the task force effort is complete final publicized meetings could be held for various geographical areas of the City to provide final notice and opportunity for input prior to public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Tentative Time Schedule The time for this effort is six months, once the task force idea is conceptually approved, details are completed, and the task force is selected. Dec. '90 Jan. '91 Feb. -Mar. April May June - Advertise for applicants - Selection of task force - Task force meetings - Neighborhood meetings - Planning Commission public hearing - City Council public hearing Attachment 1. Policies to be implemented CONCUR: evin B. North cfraft City Manager p/ccsrhip Respectfully submitted,, f•Y Mic ael Schubach Planning Director 8. Encourage and expand shelter programs with adjacent citi a -d local private interests for the temporary accommodation of the homeless. C 39. Se•i cooperate quantified or citizen housing project on PCH shoul from the City, as a means of meeting jectives. S,C receive r housing 40. Provide Af erdable Rental and / or Sale oHousing for Low and Moderate Incom. Families. C Quantified Objectives Under the provisions of subsection (7)b, the "...quantified objectives, maintenance, improvement, an following objectives • are inten and are in part taken from the Governments document, Regiona also mandated by the State, the Housing Needs Assessme e State hous City mu and d Hous and dis section o g element section 65583a specifically provide olicies relative to the elopment of housing." The to -fulfill that requirement, kern California Association of g Needs Assessment, which is ssed more thoroughly under this document. 1. Provide 150 addit'onal new housing unit in the City by 1994 and replace 145 uni - for a total of 295 unit 2. Provide 45 ery low and low income housing uni by 1994 as a part of the t. al. 3. Cons ve the two existing mobile home parks with 8 spaces via mob e home park zoning. 4. Maintain recent trends and assist in the repair, remodel an habilitation of 800 units. Policies 1. Preserve the aesthetic value of neighborhoods by examining the height limitations in each residential zone. S 2. Height of structures shall be restricted to limit view blockage when feasible and hardship does not result. S 3. Floor area ratio should be examined as a means to reduce the bulk of family residences except where lot size would result in a dwelling of obsolete size. S 4. Private open space to be provided on each lot, for each housing unit by limiting maximum lot coverage. S 5. Off-street parking spaces shall meet standards relating to size, access and location. S 6. Provision of required off—street parking spaces shall be based on typical use, household demand, total floor area for dwelling units, and number of units in developments. S 7. Parking spaces, open or enclosed, shall be for that designation and strict enforcement will be used to prevent conversion to storage or residential use such, as bedrooms, "bootleg" units, dens, etc. S 8. Density shall be imposed within the parameters stated in the General Plan. S 9. Density bonuses for senior/low income housing projects may be awarded as required by the state. C,S 10. Minimum unit size for senior citizen ownership housing (condos) will be lowered for the purpose of providing affordable units. C,S 11. Setback averaging for architectural variety and visual interest, provided that open space requirements are met, may be allowed. S 12. Open.space shall be based on a percentage of the lot 'size. Ground level open space shall be adequate in size for passive and .active recreational activity where lot size permits. ' S 13. Dwellings where the main pedestrian access is facing the side yard shall require a larger setback. S 14. Landscaping plans shall be required for all new development, including rental units; single family dwellings shall be excluded. S 15. Parking shall be designed to maximize its usefulness and availability, particularly guest spaces.. S 16. Conservation of legal non -conforming residential structures shall be directed through current procedures and programs. S 17. Increased density should be restricted in geologically and ecologically sensitive areas. S 18. A neighborhood approach of "string lining" and/or averaging shall be utilized wherever feasible in relation to any and all required standards. S 19. Residential standards shall be more precisely examined for their relative effects on development and their individual impacts during the implementation- of this element. S PREP'AkRED ENGINEE :DATE. i *NER : TIN FDS. EL! S' I V I /2770.. {til. • • THS t•1 TY'.' oF.;.�EKEI✓I�ilg .t3 H,• ULt LI IA ..:..:..• tiit\i rUt.t7 U ". �L- f .11; .Ec J APPITV't:l.` „MK. .� GO�I7E~t� IiJ ?Kt �,�.;'Y" E�;..11"lNI7.1z.;`;.,: tr-H Izt R" • '62'r•6A11�. GOUt,;4 `r'r. BSC : SUR(VEYI•NG 2006 • N. SEPULVEDA'BLVD.. ' .MANHATTAN .BEACH;, CA.90266 .�. -PH. (213) 545-5304 JAMES C. ORLAND 'R.C:E::NO..:22024 �9l JOB NO:510 79. 27 : //V E YF✓e�%IG . -/r' cr9..rae5A 8 SUBDIVID R: `0A 4E f¢0 ,,e,iy//,Er J09 ITE 566 2d r9 Sz r,' r, 1g'/I/!fi' -9 .a"i9'ar1`C.1, GE N Ef ALNOTES .J:.:•.-TOTAL,EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOTS:,t:',/C4NE),f"�r':`r�--E�:"".t�C�'> 2. TOtAC AREA': :/1.0.5-7 75 mfr, Ai1e49-/ Cdi�.54- )err= 4- —00 3... PROPOSED USE ,..2 #/4/14E' i �rti?/L Y' Lt' 7-5 4. EXISTING AND : PROPOSED ZONING: ,c / ..3. ALL lUTILITIES;AVAILABLE' TO THE SITE. %EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE DEMOLISHED 7,- NO .KNOWN EASEMENTS ON THE SITE 62/ 72C4/47, G� Mt.:' -%" //77®/O ' 'E" r J z)( / -e-- ~ ,''1l/ i ti k • ii4E� /z0.75� 37.:r. /4, nj K NQ' /( If ' 2c: cl'ii.7. t (I\ • e^�'7> r -- - - e7. : /V.77c'/O.'OmC.'.'Zr ' /moo. . - <<r 'L/veof 7;'/../-7-- A/2),' / a', -7icGn t vz E-2 /I'VE �• 72/ nvzy /2"4"75 GF Lvr 9, T02/49n7//� Ty:T 41/o/CA72C4- / erfle..a GOT ..L /4/a