Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/12/90Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council February .5, 1991 For the Meeting of. February 12, 1990 CANCELLATION OF WARRANTS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. #034354 - 8/14/90 - Rio Hondo College - $20.00,- Account Number 001-400-2101-4312. The class was cancelled, warrant never mailed: #034933 - 10/9/90 - Union War Surplus - $42.17 - Account Number 155-400-2102-4187. Check issued in error, invoice already paid for on 9/25/90 with check no. 034794, warrant never mailed. #035226 - 11/13/90 - Riverside Community College - $30.00.- Account Number 001-400-2101-4312. Tuition fee for officer TrafficTraining class changed at last minute, warrant never mailed #035233 - 11/13/90 - Miles W. Smith - $94.00 - Account Number 001-400-4601-.4201. Warrant lost in mail, stop payment made. #035304 -.11/27/90 - Canada Life - $2,577.01 - Account Number 001-400-1212-4188 for $1,981.91; 105-400-2601-4188 for $53.34; 109-400-3301-4188 for $11.34; 110-400-3302-4188 for $406.95; 145-400-3401-4188 for $4.23; 145-400-3402-4188 for $1.43; 155-400-2102-4188 for $9.79; 160-400-3102-4188 for $69.72; 705-400-1209-4188 for $16.63; 705-400-1217-4188 for $21.67. Insurance provider changed effective 12/1/90, warrant never mailed. #35429 - 12/11/90 - CA Specialized Training Inst. - $125.00 - Account Number 001-400-2101-4312. Tuition for Critical Incident Dispatch course voided due to class cancellation, warrant never mailed. #35589 - 1/8/90 - Dawn Cook - $236.25 - Account Number 001-400-2101-4312. Expense check for Critical Incident Dispatch course voided due to class cancellation, warrant never mailed. #35646 - 1/8/91 - Anne Locke - $50.00 - Account Number 001-210-0000-2110. Warrant never received, lost in the mail. Stop payment made. #035658 - 1/8/91 - Dean Menart - $236.25 - Account Number 001-400-2101-4312. Officer's previously approved training was denied by the department .due to change in unrelated division, warrant never mailed. #035769 - 1/22/91 - State of CA - $1,050.00 —Account Number 001-400-2701-4316. Number of employees attending conference was changed, warrant never mailed. #035799 - 1/22/91 - Embassy Suite Hotel - $318.00 Account Number 001-400-2701-4316. Number of employees attending conference was changed, warrant never mailed. #035842 - 1/22/91 - P. Osekowsky - $88.75 Account Number 001-400-2701-4316. Number of employees attending conference was changed, warrant never mailed. #035851 - 1/22/91 - Phoenix Food Services - $117.00 - Account Number 001-400-2701-4316. Number of employees attending conference was changed, warrant never mailed. Concur: Kevin Northcraft City Manager Gary B litsch City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact Viki Copeland Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council February 7, 1991 City Council Meeting of February 12, 1991 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS February 26, 1991 Conceptual approval of Greenbelt steps Recommendation to approve a contract for Street Lighting/Crossing Guard Assessment Districts County Emergency Rescue Agreement Recommendation on telephones in Right-of-way Status of Fire Alarm System at Community Center Recommendation on Request to VPD for meter money RFP for Records Management VPD - lots management contract renewal VPD - financial support for R/UDAT Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Safety Director General Svs. Director Public Works Director General Services Director City Clerk/General Service Director General Services Director General Services Director Contracting for Police and Fire Public Safety Director Goal 2 5/16 Options to direct dial to City Hall Gen. Svcs. Dir. Approval of Volleyball tournaments Community Resources Dir. Dept. 11/5 Approval Process for South School Conceptual Design Comm. Res. Dir. Public Hearings Update of City Goals City Manager Appeal of CUP limiting motorcycle repairs to minor repairs only at 638-640 PCH, South Bay Cycles - 1 - Planning Director ti March 12, 1991 Proposals for Workers' Comp 3rd party administrator Historical Society relocation alternatives Crossing Guards and Street Lighting Resolutions - ordinances -. prep- aration of report Utilization of Prospect School House Goal 8 5/116 Options to increasing service level of street sweeping Personnel Community Resources Dir. Public Works Director Community Resources Dir. Public Works Dir. City Mgr. 11/27 RFP for Health Ins. Broker done in comprehensive fashion Public Hearings Appeal of P.C. denial of request to allow a 2nd story office addition providing less than required off- street parking at 415 Pier Ave. March 26, 1991 8/20 Gann limit - Appropriations. subject to RFP for Computer system April 9, 1991 CIP 89-512 Accept Basketball Courts as complete May 14, 1991 Project Touch Lease Renewal (Rm. 3) June 11, 1991 Dispute Resolution Services Lease Renewal Project Touch Lease Renewal (Rm. 11) June 25, 1991 Rotation of Mayor Personnel Director Planning Director Finance General Services Director Public Works Director Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Status of fire flow improvements Public Safety Director ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Public Works Director Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council 5/8 Discuss financial arrangements on oil project City Manager Council 5/8 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project Planning Director Goal 4 5/16 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function Finance Director City Mgr. 7/24 3 -hr. vs. 2 -hr. parking meter limit in the downtown (refer to VPD) General Services Director Council 8/14 Council Council Review of standard CUP conditions Planning Dir. 8/14 Review parking on ped- estrian sts./review ways to enforce no parking in front yards Public Works Dir. 10/9 Map and time schedule for street sweeping Public Wks. Dir. Dept. 11/5 Council 11/13 Ordinance for new Chapter 19 .of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Dir. RFP for Traffic Engineer Public Place Biltmore equivalent on election Works Dir. referendum next called Planning Director City Mgr. 12/17 Photocopiers Public Safety. Director Council 1/22 Research parking cut off in lot at 3rd St. Pub.Wks./Bldg./City Mgr. Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers, you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are 'televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wesdnesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown` on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers''in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 P.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas. are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more family oriented pleasant low profile, financ�ially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services _in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by .a;City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning. from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow'schallenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays•. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done.. The City Manager,`. operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmembermay remove aniteri) from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate: Discussion.: Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by .direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or, public conduct. All ordinances require, two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. " Most or- dinances take; effect 30 days after the second reading. ,'Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council ,meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City 'Council *are %placed here. Miscellaneous' Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports -may be given: by the City Manager regarding items not on :the, agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council . Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration: by the full Council. Other Matters City Council..,. These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the 'Agenda. - `of2,4....) y)— 5 y3 , 1,t 9/- /053 "The nice thing about teamwork is that you always have others on your side." AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 12, 1991 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session 6:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Charles W. Sheldon MAYOR PRO TEM Kathleen Midstokke COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Robert Essertier Albert Wiemans CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on the Consent Calendar or any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority con- sent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) _; /51 )6C •-•-.(7 4 /22/ 4,/) &/.4 Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on January 22, 1990. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items, Recommendation to receive and file the January, 1991 investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated February 4, 1991. Recommendation to approve purchase of,,Council voting machine. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated February 4, 1991. /p2/4.1 e' -Ad a�0 Recommendation to receive and file report on cost/ benefit of Chamber of Commerce' Fiesta de las Artes': Memorandum from Finance. Director Viki`Copeland dated Jm�/w/e. r ) , �'! "`�' d /t'cj'°'`"t G ".2 Recommendation to accept a donation of Palm trees from Downtown Revitalization Committee, approve the planting of Mexican fan palms in downtown center medians, and waive excavation fees. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 31, 1991.j44 74 Recommendation to receive and file Census and Land Use Study status report. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 31, 1991. Recommendation to direct staff to work with residents on El Oeste to develop a parking permit program. Memoran- dum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich,dated �� February 5, 1991. , -��" Recommendation to approve request from International Peace Run to pass through the Fiesta de las Artes on Saturday, May 25, and that special event permit fees for a pass-through event be waived. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated February 5, 1991. %2% ) °L S./4 fit -t-0-4"""- G2 Recommendation to approve 30 -day extension of temporary appointment, Acting Deputy City Clerk. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated January 10, 1991. `-z-7 Recommendation to authorize disposition of forfeited property pursuant to Section 11473.3 of the Health and Safety Code. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated January 22, 1991. gl E (m) (n) W (o) (p) (q) (r) 2. Recommendation to receive and file Beach Volleyball Court report. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 16, 1991. L/ ~-�--r /? Y,// 5', �-c ›--,�`.'0 Recommendation to authorize call for bids for street rehabilitation and slurry seal, CIP 89-114 and CIP 89- 170. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony An- tich dated February 4, 1991. Recommendation to approve notice. inviting bids for City Hall furnishings. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki , opeland d ted February 5, 1991. ,''!7- 2 P > --�-� ( �- '7•0 -�,A (-"./`'' --� Recommendations\dopt i~esolution approv incl Map #21269 for _or ; snit condominium at .,� \iStreet. ►i, m Planning Director M�A�1 Schubach dated Memorand February Recommendat com•uter Direc 1991. approve Requests ltant. Memorandu ynthia Wilson dated roposal for a General Services ary 28, 1991. Recommendation to authorize purchase of used crawler for the Public Works Department. Memorandum from Public Wo ks Director Anthony Antich dated February 5, 1991. �-� ✓+ ..e-- vim, �.. ,, g CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter public ings. ager.) from Howard Longacre regarding changes in the participation portions of the City Council meet (Response by staff - letter from the. City Man— (Continued from 1/22/91 meeting.) PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 NONE MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF CITY ACTIONS REGARDING CAL - TRANS REMOVAL OF P.M. PARKING ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Public Works Director, Anthony Antich dated February 4, 1991.' Q__eL 6. MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW 1990-91. Memorandum from Finance Dire for Viki Copeland dated February 4, 1991. 0/N o/ M/X C 6 -4 -.)//_9,,)G,)4,;/ - SELECTION OF TASK FORCE FOR HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 17, 1991. (Continued from 1/22/91 meeting.) jej4 3 - et &/ ;6 -.A. 0 --- d 794 ‘-) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ANNUAL REPORT AND REVIEW OF CITY GOALS. Memorandum from City Manager Ke vin B. Northcraft dated January 14, 1991. (Continued from 1/22/91 meeting.) STATUS REPORT ON CITY'S AQMD REGULATION XV — TRIP REDUC- TION PLAN. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated January 15, 1991. (Continued from 1/22/ 91 meeting.) 10. RECOMMENDATION TO PROCEED WITH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, MARKETING EFFORT, AND ALTERNATE FUEL STUDY FOR TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 8, 1991. (Continued from 1/22/91 meeting.) ll 11. CITY DISPLAY OF SUPPORT FOR TROOPS INVOLVED IN THE PER- *).01-) SIAN GULF WAR. Memorandum from City Manager_ Kevin B. C J (' Northcraft dated February 5, 1991. 4/I 12. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 6191 ?3 TENTH STREET. (Continued from 1/8/91 Council meeting and subsequent referral back to Planning Commission.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 6, 1991. W 15(0) (a) MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS- CITY MANAGER Scheduling Memorandum February 5, (b) Setting of Memorandum February 5, of goals setting session in February, 1991. from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated • 19 91. =? 0 `%o, ,ii, 1J.411i -C joint meeting with Chamber of Commerce. from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated 1991. 6o- -' 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies - Boards and Commissions Planning Commission - One vacancy, for a term ending June 30, 1992. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL e� February 6, 1991. 6662 - Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: ) u -J (a) 1988 Hermosa Saloon request for parking changes. Memo- randum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated February 5, 1991. (Requested by Mayor Pro Tem Midstokke.) 429 (b) CITIZEN Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. Request for review of public participation changes on the City Council agenda. (Requested by Councilmember Wiemans.) Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to dis- cuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council, on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT � n eym 6,, 9 CC7 L.4629 /al A ( 2 2 -7 Z f MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1991 SUBJECT: ' INITIATIVE PETITION RE BILTMORE SITE An initiative petition was submitted February 7, 1991, by Parker Herriott concerning a proposed measure to create and designate the Biltmore site as Open Space O -S-2 for its preservation and use as a public park. The petition was submitted within the 180 - day time period. The Clerk's office completed its review of the petition today and has accepted the petition for filing, since it was determined that the number of signatures (1,822), prima facie, exceeds the minimum number of signatures required (1,199 = 10 percent for. regular election; 1,798 = 15 percent for special election). Thirty (30) days are allowed for signature verification. If the petition is found to be sufficient, it will be presented to City Council at its next regular meeting after the verification is complete. Elaine Doerflin•. Cit Clerk cc: City Manager MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City•of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, January 22, 1991, at the hour of 7:46 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 6:38 P.M. pur- suant'to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) regarding matters of potential litigation; Government Code Section 54956.9(a) regard- ing matters of litigation: LeFay vs City of Hermosa Beach; Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property negotia- tions for the South School site with the Hermosa Beach School Board of Trustees; meet and confer: Police Associations; and, personnel/evaluation: compensation of the City Manager. The ses- sion was adjourned at 7:38 P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Chuck Sheldon, Mayor ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Sheldon congratulated Ethel Kauffold, a Hermosa Beach resident since 1959, on. her 101st birthday. PRESENTATION OF OUTSTANDING EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER AWARD: Mary Fehskens, Business License Inspector, Business License Department Mayor Sheldon presented a plaque to Mary Fehskens, in recognition of her outstanding work and over ten years of service with the City of Hermosa Beach. Personnel Director Robert Blackwood read the commendation. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward at.this time to address the Council were;. Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, spoke on the Biltmore site and Court Hearing (set for February 19, 1991). • Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, questioned items 1(g) , 1(k) , and 1(m) . 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (m), with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion but are listed in order for clarity: (a) Midstokke, (g) Wiemans, (i) Wiemans, (k) Wiemans, (1) Sheldon, and (m) Essertier. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered. City Council Minutes 01-22-91 Page 7367 (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on January 08, 1991. (b) This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting, as she wished the minutes to reflect on item 5, page 7360, that subsequent direction was given to staff to look into the alley access/street access issue and the apparent inconsistency with the adopted Circulation, Transportation, and Parking Element of the General Plan,. since that was the basis for her affimative vote on the project. Action: To approve the minutes of January 08, 1991, as amended. Motion Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants No. 35536 and Nos. 35728 through 35885 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 35735, 35736, 35737, 35738, 35781, 35796, 35805, 35806, and 35807. Action: To approve the demands and warrants. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the December, 1990 City Treasurer's Report. (e) Action: To receive and file. Recommendation of Planning Commission to adopt a resolu- tion and to approve the City Council referral of Condi- tional Use Permits for four 2 -unit condos and vesting Tentative Parcel Maps #22634 through 22637 at 138 - 142, 144 148, 150 - 154, and 158 - 160 Manhattan Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 16, 1991. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 91-5431, entitled, 'IA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FOUR CONTIGUOUS 2-UNIT'CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS AT 138-160 MANHATTAN AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 6 THROUGH 9, TRACT NO. 1123." (f) Recommendation to accept Second Quarterly review of Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1990-91. City Council Minutes 01-22-91 Page 7368 it (g) (h) (i) Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 10, 1991. Action: To receive and file. Recommendation for approval of revised class specifica- tion for. Code Enforcement Officer/Assistant Planner. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed January 17, 1991.. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for, separate discussion later in the meeting, due to questions regarding salary and duties. Proposed Action: To wait until a Code Enforcement Unit is formed to make the change in classification. Motion Wiemans. Motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To approve the change in classification from Assistant Planner to Code Enforcement Officer/Assistant Planner. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. Recommendation to adopt a Resolution for County Aid to Cities Funds to be used for CIP 89-137 Overlay Valley/ Ardmore/Prospect. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 14, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) adopt Resolution No. 91-5432, entitled, HA RESOLUTION OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING AN AL- LOCATION AND PAYMENT OF COUNTY AID TO CITIES FUND."; 2) approve the estimated revenue to the. City Gas Tax Fund in the amount of $60,579; and, 3) approve a $60,579 appropriation to Capital Im- provement Project (CIP) 89-137, the overlay of Valley/Ardmore/Prospect. Recommendation to receive and file status report on the City's AQMD Regulation XV - Trip Reduction Plan. Memo- randum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated January 15, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Council Minutes 01-22-91 Page 7369 (j) (k) (1) Action: To continue this item to the regular meeting of February 12, 1991. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. Recommendation to approve award of bid for public notic- ing making City responsible agent for noticing and amend Master Fee resolution. Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated January 14, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract for public noticing services from South Bay Noticing and Subdivision Consulting, and 2) adopt Resolution No. 91-5433, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CAL- IFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR GIVING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS RELATED TO ZONING AND OTHER LAND USE MATTERS AND AMENDING RESOLUTION 90-5422 REGARDING NOTICING FEES." Recommendation to accept donation offered by the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce to repair City marquee. Memo- randum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated January 15, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. Debra Blakeney, president of the Chamber of Commerce, presented a check for $7,000 for the restoration of the City marquee. Missy Sheldon accepted the check on be- half of the Community Center Foundation. Action: To approve the staff recommendation, with the understanding that there will be no increase in the Chamber's right to use the sign. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. Recommendation to approve City Council/Planning Commis- sion workshop. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 16, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Mayor Sheldon for separate discussion later in the meeting in order to establish a date certain. Action: To receive and file this item and to set an approximate date of April 1991. Motion Mayor Sheldon, second Midstokke. So ordered. City Council Minutes 01-22-91 Page 7370 (m) Recommendation to approve proposed disclosure statement regarding discretionary projects. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated January 14, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter were: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street; Jerry Compton = 837 Seventh Street. Action: To approve the staff recommendation that the following disclosure statement should be, used to advise applicants that when discretionary approval is neces- sary, additional and/or more restrictive standards than those in city codes may be imposed: "NOTICE... PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE REQUIREMENTS AND POLI- CIES OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, GENERAL PLAN, AND OTHER MUNICIPAL CODES ONLY REPRESENT MINIMUMS. IF DISCRETION- ARY APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR FROM THE CITY COUNCIL ON APPEAL, ADDITIONAL AND/OR MORE RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENTS MAY BE IMPOSED ON THE PROJECT TO ADDRESS SITE SPECIFIC CONCERNS AND/OR TO MITIGATE ANY ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT POTENTIALLY WOULD BE CAUSED BY AP- PROVAL OF THE PROJECT. CITY STAFF ARE AVAILABLE FOR ASSISTANCE AND CAN PROVIDE SAMPLES OF TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS THAT MAY BE IM- POSED, BUT CANNOT ASSUME IN ANY WAY WHAT REQUIREMENTS MAY FINALLY BE APPROVED." And, to include at the end of the first paragraph the amendment requested by the City Attorney which reads, "THE SCOPE OF REVIEW AND FINDINGS REQUIRED MAY BE FOUND IN THE APPLICABLE DIVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ." Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objection of Wiemans. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items (a) and (g) were discussed at this time. At 8:07 P.M. items (i), (k), (1), and (m) and item 4 were sus- pended until after item 5, a public hearing. All items, however, are listed in order for clarity. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. Letter from Howard Longacre regarding changes in the Public participation portions of the City Council meet- ings. (Response by staff- letter from the City Manager) City Council Minutes 01-22-91 Page 7371 Action: To continue this item to the regular meeting of February 12, 1991. Motion Mayor Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY P.M. PARKING REMOVAL. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 14, 1991. Mayor Sheldon introduced Caltrans representatives: Dave Gilstrap - Senior Engineer for Route 1; Gary Bork - Chief of Traffic Operations; Karl Berger Transportation Engineer for Route 1; and,. R. Salvador - Signal Maintenance. Mr. Berger made the presentation for Caltrans. The meeting recessed at 9:35 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:46 P.M. The public hearing was opened. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter and speak against the Caltrans proposal to remove parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway from 3:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, excluding holi- days, were: Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive; Les Barry - 441 Second Street; G. G. Lias - Hermosa Beach; Jim Brisson - 211 Pacific Coast Highway; Norma Gowin - 2001 Pacific Coast Highway; Kevin Mack - 92 Eighteenth Street; Donna Klein - 809 Pacific Coast Highway; Steve Crecy - 1148 Second Street; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street; Roy Collier - 853 Pacific Coast Highway; Jerry Compton - 837 Seventh Street; and, Rick Learned - 1727 Monterey Blvd. Coming forward to speak in favor of the Caltrans proposal were: Roger Bacon - 1100 Pacific Coast Highway; and, James Clark - 19510 Tomlee Avenue, Torrance. The public hearing was closed Mayor Sheldon said that the City had three possible future actions on the matter: 1) to approve the parking restriction by City Ordinance; 2) to not approve the parking restriction and to sue Caltrans; and, 3) to try to reach some compromise by agreeing City Council Minutes 01-22-91 Page 7372 with Caltrans to some "benchmark" criteria and a definitetrial time period to determine if safety and traffic flow are improved with the parking restrictions. Dave Gilstrap, of Caltrans, agreed to a trial period of one year, if an agreement could be reached for the determining criteria. Action: To continue the matter to a closed session, and to direct staff to work with Caltrans to develop the criteria that could be used to determine, after a trial period, if Caltrans' contention of improved safety and greater regional mobility was founded, and to return with that information for the meeting of February 12, 1991. Mayor Sheldon so ordered the action, noting the consen- sus of the Council. The meeting recessed at 10:52 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:59 P.M. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. SELECTION OF TASK FORCE FOR HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated January 17, 1991. Action: To continue this item to the regular meeting of February 12, 1991, allowing applications to be accepted, but without readvertising. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. 7. RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE CABLE TV ASCERTAINMENT AND RENEWAL. _Memorandum from General Services Director Cyn- thia Wilson dated January 16, 1991. Director Wilson presented the staff report, responded to. Council questions, and introduced Donald Granger, Regional Vice President for MultiVision. Cable Television. Mr. Granger said that MultiVision Cable T.V. would pay for a formal needs assessment, but he felt the usual cost was in the $6,000 to $8,000 .range, and would like the Request for Proposal (R.F.P.) to reflect this range. Director Wilson agreed that $6,000 to $8,000 was the usual range for a needs assessment, but added that there could be additional costs as this would also include assistance with the formal franchise renewal process. Mr. Granger said that he was willing to discuss the ad- ditional amount for franchise renewal. City Council Minutes 01-22-91 Page 7373 Proposed Action: To approve staff alternative #2, to require MultiVision to redo the survey. Motion Midstokke. The Motion.died due to the lack of a second. Action: To approve the staff recommendations to: 1) accept the Critique of Multivision Cable Tele- vision Public Access Needs Assessment, prepared by Communication Support Group, Inc.; 2) authorize issuance of Request for Bid for con- sulting services to conduct a formal needs as- sessment and assisting the formal franchise renewal process, at a cost not to exceed $15,000; and, 3) commence formal franchise renewal proceedings as provided in the 1984 Cable Act. And, with the understanding that the cost of the formal needs assessment shall be borne by MultiVision Cable Television. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered, noting the objection of Midstokke. 8. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE ANNUAL REPORT AND REVIEW OF CITY GOALS. Memorandum from City Manager Ke- vin Northcraft dated January 14, 1991. Action: To continue this item to the regular meeting of February 12, 1991. Motion Creighton, second Wiemans. So ordered 9. RECOMMENDATION TO PROCEED WITH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, MARKETING EFFORT AND ALTERNATIVE FUEL STUDY RE. TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael.Schubach date January 8, 1991. Action: To continue this item to the regular meeting of February 12, 1991. Motion Creighton, second Wiemans. So ordered 10. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin Northcraft dated January 3, 1991. City Manager Northcraft presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve an amendment to the current agree- ment for City Attorney Services with Oliver, Stoever, Barr and Vose to provide for a periodic 5% adjustment and an extension of the existing agreement to December 31, 1992. Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. So ordered City Council Minutes 01-22-91_ Page 7374 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS CITY MANAGER 11. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PROCEDURE FOR UPDATING CITY GOALS. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin Northcraft dated January 16, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendations, except to change the date of the televised work session to Thursday, February 07, 1991, at the hour of 7:00 P.M., and approve a public hearing on the proposed goals to be held during the regular meeting of February 26, 1991. Mayor Sheldon so ordered the action, noting the consen- sus of the Council. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL 12. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON CITY MANAGER EVALUATION FORM. Memorandum from Subcommittee Members Robert Essertier and Kathy Midstokke dated January 17, 1991. Action: To approve the form in concept, but to allow the' subcommittee to change the format of the response areas, such as to insert areas for comments or to in- clude number ratings. Motion Mayor Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Mayor Sheldon commented that there were no accidents shown for the Strand on the December Paramedic/Fire Department report; he asked staff to check on the ac- curacy of this report as he had witnessed accidents on the Strand during this time period. Councilmember Midstokke wished to thank the City Staff, who volunteered their time and labor, and Citizens, who volunteered their money, time, and labor, for a very successful "tree planting" on the Greenbelt. Councilmember Midstokke said that Jim Brisson, the owner of The Hermosa Saloon, had sent a letter referencing an issue that he had brought up in 1988 concerning a block wall that cut off public access to a parking lot in the vicinity of 200 - 400 Pacific Coast Highway; she asked that staff research this issue and place it on a future agenda. CITIZEN COMMENTS Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, questioned the directions given to staff at the close of the public hearing regarding Pacific Coast Highway parking. City Council Minutes 01-22-91 Page 7375 Betty Martin - 27th Street, suggested that the City fly United States flags from the light poles, as we do on patriotic Holidays, while we have troops fight- ing in the Persian Gulf. Mayor Sheldon directed staff to research the cost and manpower needed to do this and report back for the February 12, 1991, agenda. ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, January 22, 1991, at the hour of 11:56 P.M., to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, February 12, 1991, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. a/cUMOL Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 01-22-91 Page 7376 • • • 2 3 6 e 7 8 1.2,41 0.25 22 • 19 31 4M-32 39 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME -10:25:16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/1279f VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE*INVC .' PROJ a# ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION PAGE 0001 DATA 00%07%91 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP -Fr ___... ADMIRAL PLUMBING -&-HEATING X3829- OOf=210=0000-21 f 0 - if4073 ` .. ._- X375. 00 -- -'"` O�i235 01477 3990$ WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 09235 01/30/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 *#* VENDOR TOTAL ***$*teat***** ***************#it3i• -#u#**** *****tt*******•u-it #ii******** $375:00* H THE#CALIF" PARK'"&"-REC SOCIETY REG/BELSER/EDISON 60-61 -00602 001=400=4601=4317- x0126 •$285.00 - 01/28/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******#######***u•x-*#**4*44.tt-4##arm#1i#4-4***u•##*ar###*-tt-1###***• 44. -'H STATE OF*CALIFORNIA TUITION/G. DALE STATE OF*CALIFORNIA TUITION/K. MITCHELL 8295. 0.0 - -02!35'00j-400--2701-4316...00068- _ $350.00 --- TR351 01/22/91 CIVIL DEFENSE /TRAINING TR353 02135 001-400-2701-4316 00069 01/22/91 8350. 00 CIVIL DEFENSE /TRAINING '***-VENDOR TOTAL 4#44444aa 1•#4#4*•it•#asr###4414 44 4444 44i#4•iz4*44*4*444**•rid•##**4*4 i* CDS NATIONAL USERS GROUP TUITION/ELLEDGE/LOUGHIN 57-58 $700: 00 -02877-- 00140021014316 x0678--- $390.00 01/30/91 POLICE /TRAINING -___...-_-sat# VENDOR - TOTAL '##•x•-* #*####•## •u•###*#*aI**-ii- # iial:43F-* •u###4-4 1 •it# arii*-x•44-44-4#*�i•-•>t*#ii-i* * VIRGINIA*ELLEDGE -7.----* - PER DIEM ADVANCE H VIRGINIA*ECLEuc;t 4111 30 40 • 41 42 43 •44 45 0.47 44 4 50 n2 • 13 54 5h •55 • •03858--00-1.-:4017-21.01.4316 -00675 TR358 01/30/91 POLICE $390 00 ... $77.25 /TRAINING -03858-- o01-4400=2101-433-00677 $80. -00 AIRFARE/ELLEDGE/LOUGHIN TR358 01/30/91 POLICE /TRAINING VENDOR TOTAL#****#*at•*at*4**********at#aI#*######•il-#at4#*#at*at#at##ar:st***•11.-1~4***##.u.## 234 4 5 '1 11 V u7 12 TR360=61 36063--..._ ..35893-----� $0. 00 -02/06/91 1H 19 TR351 00351-- $0.00 0351 $0.00 02/06/91 TR353 00353 . 35887 $0.00 02/06/91 3.1 TR357-58. 35758 35899 $0.00 02/06/91 14 40 • 40 $157:25' TR358 O0-358- 4 1 0358 41 4r1100 35895 4� $0.00 02/06/91 4740 4., TR358 $0.00 02/06/91 ,741, T LEAGUE--OF':CAL11-UHNI7�CITIES -----003I7 001=400-f101-4317 00077 $3, 300. OZ5 --TR32CF 00320 35891 REG/2 COUNCILMEMBERS TR320 01/28/91 CITY COUNCIL /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 02/06/91 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA*CITIES -_-"'--D03I7 - 001-400-12014317`- "00235.............1o: 00..-.----- CONF REG/K.B. NORTHCRAFT TR320 01/28/91 CITY MANAGER /CONFERENCE EXPENSE OR TOTAL stat*******4. 4*#****•it***********ai•�t*****at**u•*******s**********at*****at*** $2,000.00 IESI • DIANNE*LOUGHIN PER DIEM ADVANCE 1 494 -03628-- 001=400-2101-4316...'.00679.. .. _ , ..$77.25 . TR357 01/30/91 POLICE /TRAINING ' 1 5o GI ,€. 5P ~1R320 00320 35891 $0.00 02/06/912� Fl41, K7W 71. li /3 74 75 NIP 40 TR357 00357- • '35900 .. $0.00 02/06/91 40 tyt it S7i ii tK ": a ;y y6F+ c �P6`+c yYi u£?Dh 4444 •.WieW;+'Y 4. O FINANCE-SFA340 IME I0. 23: 16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION -7-7--------77 -.__..**-*_VENDOR TOTAL"#####*##'#####*##### -n#*#####******###'##-*############*###########***** OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND -LIST FOR 02/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT - DRTE 7NVC— -PRIIJ # ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION • • • w 14 15 16 17 10 21 24 25 76 %1 211 .1 50 37 H MARRIOTT HOTEL -7 HOTEL ADV/V. ELLEDGE H MARRIOTT HOTEL HOTEL ADV/D. LOUGHIN ---03859-----001=400-2101-4316- -03859-"---D01=400-2101-4316-"" 00676- TR358 01/30/91 POLICE 03859 001-400-2101-4316 TR357 01/30/91 POLICE INV/REF PAGE 0002 DA 1 E-0270779 PO M CHK * AMUUN i UNENC—DTE $170. 40 - -" " - TR35B 00358"---- .. _ , . -35896-- /TRAINING $0. 00 02/06/91 00680. ' . . . $170: 40- --- __.__ _..-TR357 00357- 33901 /TRAINING $0. 00 02/06/91 VENDOR TOTAL*###########################'*###########*##**********#*****4###***#* MT. SAN ANTONIO"COLLEGE' TUITION/P. OSEKOWSKY • ---4034-46------001400-22014316- -00267- 01/31/91 "-'00267- 01/31/91 FIRE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL **** -x*******#********#******#************#*** ->f*#****#*##*#********** PHOENIX FOOD 'SERVICES' LUNCHES/G. DALE PHOENIX FOOD SERVICES LUNCHES/K.-MITCHELL $340: 80 . " " $64.50 ----03131-5-----001400-2701-4316 00066 . $39.00 TR351 01/22/91 CIVIL DEFENSE /TRAINING 03615"-" "--""001-400-2701=43ib-._.. 00067...... ' . $39. 00-- - TR353 01/22/91 CIVIL DEFENSE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL************##************#**##*#*********************************** PITNEY BOWES "" ' POSTAGE METER RESET 36 - ------***-VENDOR TOTAL 14 40 .._.-.-. 41 47 43 45 96518 -03860---. --"--001=400-1208-4305 ...... 00855 02/05/91 GEN APPROP v - - POSTMASTER" Davy, P.O. BOX RENTAL/TO 1/92 728 01/23/91 $78.00 f(1 72 11256 _ .35904..._._.; $0.00 02/06/91 TR351 00351--..-_-35886- $0.00 02/06/91 . TR353 00353-- - 30.00 02/06/91 32, 000. 00 - - -- 10596518 0E17:5-4-0- _35908_..._ $0.00 02/06/91 4C /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $2, 000.00 ._ .. ....... UUI-400-1202=4305..._"-00366--...._---- FINANCE ADMIN, /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL * ''*'*#'******'*************m#*#*+F*#*'#*#***it#********it***fir**tr#****** POSTMASTER '(f0398 47 BULK MAIL/PKG PERMITS - 01/23/91 4A TOTAL."***#**##-sF##**#'*#*#*##***W***#3F*###aFP*****##********##****###*#-ft##*#* 50 $72.00 11-0-40u=3302-4305 00765 $1,185.05 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 51 52 •• 53 5. 6 56 7 "41;1E35. -00- H 41; 1E35. -00- H " PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT -SYS. `00'036 "1301=4001213=4'1-60- 00465- . '$86;772:84 RETIREMENT/DEC 90 01/28/91 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT 34 .. ,,1 .11 11. 728 01123 . 3386B 30. 00 02/06/91 411 51 51 '7 01-612----35889 $0.00 02/06/91 FINANCE-SFA340 if/1E-10;25:16 2 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12/93 PAGE 0003 $ATE 02R1T/91 VND 4!' 'ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK #__ DATE-INVC- PROJ # -ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION -AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H ' PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. -00026 '001`400=1213-4180 "00466 RETIREMENT/DEC 90 01/28/91 RETIREMENT 2 10 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS_ 00026 001-=400-1213-4180 00467 $72, 267. 66CR .... ' - -- - 35894 11 RETIREMENT/DEC 90 ' 01/28/91 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT $0.00 02/06/91 12 $17, 136. 31CR /RETIREMENT $0.00 02/06/91 14 15 15 - H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 109-400-3301-4180 00011 $144.85 35894 . M RETIREMENT/DEC 90 01/28/91 VEH PKG DIST /RETIREMENT $0.00 02/06/91 to H _ PUB EMPLOYEES --RETIREMENT SYS: -'-00026 --`_iii=400=3302-418Ci__._00144 -_... ---$4,994:20 .___$4,994:20 35894 20 RETIREMENT/DEC 90 01/28/91 PARKING ENF /RETIREMENT $0.00 02/06/91 22 - • H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 145-400-3401-4180 00117 $58.33 - 35894 29 RETIREMENT/DEC 90 - 01/28/91 DIAL A.RIDE_ /RETIREMENT $0.00 02/06/91 -'124 5 --" H '. PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 345=400-3402-4186 00117 $19.74 2e RETIREMENT/DEC 90 01/28/91 ESEA /RETIREMENT $0.00 27 'PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026— 105-400=2601-4180. 00143 $711.63-- 01/28/91 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT RETIREMENT/DEC 90 _ 35894 $0.00 02/06/91 2 3 4 e -4 10 ii 18 I0 35894- 02/06/91 H PUB' EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 ` 145-400-3403-4180. 00064 $17.22 35894 r 20 RETIREMENT/DEC 90 01/28/91 BUS PASS SUBSDY /RETIREMENT $0.00• 02/06/91 >o 31 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 1555=400-2102-4180 00115 5120.52 "' .35894 32 RETIREMENT/DEC 90 01/28/91 CROSSING GUARD /RETIREMENT $0.00 -02/06/91 2.7 04 H.. PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. -00115-- 16T-400-:-.310274180 0014'2 8952. 27 -35894 -- se RETIREMENT/DEC 90 - 01/28/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /RETIREMENT $0.00 02/06/91 se • 37 38 r7O 140 45 40 47 48 4G 50 51 52 59 54 H-" - . , PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS: -1301326---'I70=400=2103-4186-150016 v '$4;172:02 RETIREMENT/DEC 90 01/28/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS /RETIREMENT H . .. 'PUB EMPLOYEES" RETIREMENT 'SYS. """ ;00026- -'705-400=1209=41$0` 00066 '$236.57 RETIREMENT/DEC 90 01/20/91 LIABILITY INS /RETIREMENT H^ -PUB-EMPLOYEES-RETIREMENT-SYS. 00026 705-400=1217;-41SU J 00066 - -$3047-22- RETIREMENT/DEC $30-4'22-RETIREMENT/DEC 90 01/28/91 WORKERS COMP /RETIREMENT $0.00 02/06/91 $0.00 02/06/91 80.00 02/06/91 -49## VENDOR TOTAL'############'##*##*************************************************** $9,100.44 55 50 7 SANTA--CLARA'-.HOUSING--BUREAU- 03037—_" 1518=4.00=4601-4317"7- 000-25 "$192:24- _.__..._ TR360=61 .00361 35892 HOTEL/BELSER/EDISON 60-61 01/28/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 80.00 02/06/91 71 !3 ;:40 70 ?1 ,6K rki • FINANCE-SFA340 ME 10:25:16 811. IR 13 14 15 17 IP ID ,r0 71 PAY VENDOR NAME ----DESCRIPTION: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12/91- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT -DATE-iNvt. VROJ # -ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION ***-vENDOR TOTAL PAGE 0004 DATE-02707791Th 2 3 INV/REF PO # CHK # 4 70TOUNT-UNENC- DAM H J. S.444ARD'ti CD: AS AGENT FOR —0246E-- 705-400-1209-4324---00166 $85, 050. 99 SETTLEMENT/LA FAY CLAIM 01/23/91 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS TOTAL-******************************************************-****:********** - -$85,050.99' ------***A2Ay CODE TOTAL' ****************************************************************** 4.• 41 $102,068.47 -01324- malT07-- 40.00 02/06/91 A & E TROPHIES- -1X.2744- 001-400-1101"4319- 00099- ' $19. :9632. MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 9632 01/31/91 CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS $0.00 02/06/91 • *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** ADMIRAL-PLUMBINa &-HEATING WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 09235 314.70 -03827- -001"210-0000-2110" 04089 $375.00 ' 09235 '01544 01/16/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE ,, $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************************vv*************** R' - ADVANCED -ELECTRONICS' RADIO MAINT/FEB 91 R ' ADVANCED ELECTRONICS' PARTS/PORTABLE RADIOS ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/FEB 91 RADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/FEB 91 42 0095----•-001,1:400=-2101=4201•••-• 00730- 24574 02/01/91 POLICE -00935- ---001"400-2101 -4307---00261 23964 01/10/91 POLICE 24574 -00935 -- 001"400-2201-4201 - 00196 - 02/01/91 • FIRE ----00935-110"400"3302-4307 00034 24727 02/01/91 PARKING ENF $375. 00 5 7 0 7 20 I I 12 27 14 ; A 17 III ID 70 41 27 20 I" 35913-71:, 02/06/91 -$1,133.20------ • 24574 00048 - 35914 $0.00 02/06/91 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $11314.87: - - --23964 0170T35914 /RADIO MAINTENANCE $1,319.94 02/06/91 4' $283. 30 - - 24574 00048 -35914- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/06/91 r" $314.00-7-------- 24727' /RADIO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/06/91 !" ------***--VENDOR TOTAL IfkiF***************41:******--****-***V**-4c* *IRV-1W*** if** 41, its**$'4 41*** **31-11:**** *4* $3, 045:37- " 50 45 (12 48 - SAND R A*AL L EN I -03E330 001-210--0000=2110-04090 -3375. O 09255 01542- 35915 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 09255 ' 01/16/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************4**********-***31-***************I***.**4******** $375.-00 51 52 3 54 511 41.7 .7. -AMERICAN-EAGLE- - ------- BUS FOR SENIOR TRIP • 01/15/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00196 $0.00 02/06/91723 67 tifl 71 72 77 74 75 712 1114 40, AVIA 2 3 e 7 • ii 13 14 15 IL it 18 14 70 vl 24 z, 75 77 90 31 32 39 1. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME" •I O-: 25: 16 ' PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12/9f -- PAGE " 0005 DAT 02%07/91_ VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO 0 CHK * _DATE-INVC•.-..-----PROJ 44 -ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION .. -- '---'---'-"' AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP _.. -- ***-VENDOR TOTAL*#******************************#•u•*q-•p•#*:n.******** .**********x******** R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 00857 ..,. 001-400-2101-4306 MISC. CHARGS/JAN 91 5686 01/31/91 POLICE 00919 $480:135'-- $54.-- $54. 00 5686 00015 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 — ** ' VENDOR TOTAL'*********##***'*************4t•'*iF** 4i*-*#4F****44*****44-**tt**& ** iii} it it* 3 s e 11 10 35917- 02/06/91 ' Is R BRAD*ANGELERI -03F342--001=210-0000-:211.0 - --04080' $1,575.00- 95626 01548- 35918 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND' 95626 01/29/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 - - *** VENDOR TOTAL 4F***:*****#**-**#**4F******4**4t*4*3rd*444"#********#***4t****�•*****#****** "$1,575:00 R ASPA INSURANCE PLANS -- 02218 -.. 001-400-1212-4188 ' 01988 $115.00 075050500464 00061" CITY HEALTH INS/MAR-JUN 00464 01/15/91 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ia****'************4l-****************************************at********* $115.00.. _.._. 8 8 9 i1 J 3 24 25 77 35919' • 02/06/91 ' • 03423 _.._._..001=400-2101-4304- .00746. $9. 55• • ._.. UO126 • � � 35920 MOBILE PHONE CHGS/DEC 90 12/31/90 POLICE /TELEPHONE $0.00 02/06/91 "l VENDOR' TOTAL"***************************-***-4c*F*-******-it*****-********************** _ $9:35-- -•-- AUTOMATED FILING SYSTEMS, INC. --03535-7---001--400-2101-4305-01431 $312.74' -- .._. . 8873 01746 35921 FILE FOLDERS/POLICE 8373 01/17/91 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $307.44 02/06/91 *** VENDOR -TOTAL_ ******-*****W** -'***.*****************&3F********4r******4r#44114*** ,***** .... . .. '-$312:74- BEACH .-$312:74- BEACH MARKET, INC. '031350------001210-0000-2f10' 04086 $250.00 -'. ...-. 06021 BANNER DEPOSIT REFUND 06021 01/31/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE -**-VENDOR TOTAL *****4E#***'Iii*41:*#4i*****4*# * *4i:4E* **4 *## *#4f4* **4r****************** .$250:00 $0. 00 - 35922 02/06/91 42 5▪ 0 511 P BELL Ec 'HOWELLnc . --. ---005-63'-_-._..__001=400-4201-4305.-_.._00635.... . -$236.---------7- "305648 . 00665'-----..-..35923 MICROFILM/BUILDING 05648 01/22/91 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES, 02/06/91 `" .$2307-37 NJ --WW* VENDOR TOTAL"***********4c*******##****fi-*#************.M ************ ,.• M1, R BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. "-02664:-----001-400-1101-4305 -00351 .. $1, 096: 95 "'" CAP IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS 1361 01/10/91 CITY�COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 136$1,065.37 02/06/910 /3 74 73' 4511. IP FI ^ " 3 ° " lrme-10.25:16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 7 -'' /., 13 =" ' °., ~ .. CITY OF xsnmoeA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12191 *mo # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN w AMOUNT -114VC '-PnoJ w -ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION INV/REF PAGE 0006 --DxTE 02707/ DAT R osezmv PRINTING -SERVICE, .zmr: 1203-4305 -00297-- $213.oo----'—'�-�oa�—oz BUS rAnoo/czvI,osnv COM 1362 01/10/91 PERSONNEL /OFFICE op — SUPPLIES *21�^" 91 rorAc *********************°* °°°°°°°°°°°**m***°**************** *1.309:95- �� " , `" a " OAR- ----'_A.-_' ~~-^^..^-°""-^°^'^= -°=. MAG TAPES/OCT-DEC 90 14377 01/16/91 ��oua-Lzc ----'�" /cowrnAoT ---^^~Ios/oovr ---***-VENDOR TOTAL *****************°v********** ************************ m ^' ••••L, 24 � �~ Da. |', � 37-----n--- ~" n onowm/m0-m'FERRIS-zmoosrnzss TRASH PICKUP/FEB 91 BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/FEB 91 ----noc�o-'---o01400-1208-*201-70072602/01/91 GEN APPROP - 00155---109-400-3301-4201 00027 02/01/91 vs* pxn DIST w0000 • '-- - $578.37 -- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/06/91 $516.63 5ra nr-- *n1a.ao /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ----***'vENDOnrOTAL *********************************************mm******************** R • oAnv°onuroon, CITY TREASURER PETTY oma*/1-16 TO 1-31 n ' GAnf*nnorocn.'CITYrnsAoonsn PETTY oAaH/1-16 TO 1-31 n nAnv*onnrscn, CITY -TREASURER PETTY o^oH/1-16 TO 1-31 ~^. ~ ~ 42 43 44 45 .36 , ° 49 " "' ° ° 64 GARY*BRUTSCW-CITY-TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 02016-----001=400=1203-*305'--00296 ' -- o2/04/91 PERSONNEL /OFFICE OF -'ER SUPPLIES ' -onoaa ' *o.00 - '— ' 02/04/91 BUS LICENSE /TRAINING • ' -02016----00z=400L-2101-4305-'01430 02/04/91 POLICE /OFFICE ------o2oz6-----'1301=400=2101-4312---01631 • 02/04/91 POLICE /TRAVEL CITY -TREASURER • PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 � GARY*BnmSCH;_rzrr-TnsASURER PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 _ - T PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 ----_--'n-- GAnY*nnuronH.-oIrr TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 , 56 56 , *17.cc— - OPER SUPPLIES EXPENSE POST. _ 0001e�. 101-4316- '00682 *121.80 -- 02/04/91 POLICE /TRAINING -'noxoo_--- *25:00-'----02/04/91 FIRE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES --'- 111 19 ° 20 '' " ^ � = 2 00000-- 35926 -'H `' " " • 01554- -35928 ' *n.00 02/06/91 ~- 01554- 35928--^. o155r 'an9oe _� 0155*' ---35928-- 7 ° Si 0054---- �35928'---� 0155* --7 -35926 --- -020755-- -00T-400=3103-4309---n.1097-- --$1:57' 01-554 -3-5'928--- u2/04/p1 ST MAINTENANCE- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *000 o2/06/91 ' -'--020z6- n01-*00=4z0-1=9305--00*97' 00--' -~'~~ PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *o.00: 02/06/91- SA AG 60 "' ° = ' 66 67 = ° � ° � 7 /1 2 6 7 a a 1.0 11 12 19 14 16 177 18 19 20 21 23 24 28 Zr 27 ;;, .18 30) 30 32 33 Ill 38 97 10 41 /2 F I NANCE-SFA340 IME 10: 25: 16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION GARY*BRUTSCH rITY-TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 GARY*BRUTSCH,- CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 GARY*BRUTSCH; 'CITY -TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY'TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH - DEMAND LIST FOR 02/1279f -- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 , AMOUNT # 7ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION PAGE 0007 ----D-ATE-027077 INV/REF PO 0 CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 0201"6 -7700T=400=4101-431.-6-770102W $12;00.. 02/04/91 PLANNING /TRAINING $0.00 -201-6 001 400-4201-4310 '00081 02/04/91 BUILDING 020T6--- 00T=400=4202-=-4305 --00545- 02/04/91 PUB WKS ADMIN -02016-----001.--400-42044309 01883 02/04/91 BLDG MAINT GARY*BRUTSCHT CITY TREASURER 6201"6 PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31. 02/04/91 GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 GARY*BRUTSCH, -c-rTy TREASURER PETTY CASH/1-16 TO 1-31 001-400-4601-4308-00502 COMM RESOURCES ---cmoi-46-----oot=1,400-6143o9 01004 02/04/91 PARKS -020-1-67'1T0'40O-33O2-43--05- 00767 02/04/91 PARKING ENF $16. 40 * -01554 /MOTOR FUELS AND LURES $30798 - /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $15. 62 /MAINTENANCE MATER IALS $38.10 /PROGRAM MATERIALS $23.96 -- /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $5. 27 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** BUSINESS -SYSTEMS -SUPPLY 00034 -7-oar---400L=i2o6=:4005- 00484 *85/.36 01/09/91 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES PRINTER RIBBONS/DATA PRO R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY LETTERHEAD/LASER PAPER -00034- ---001-400-1208-4305'. 00856 72160 01/30/91 GEN APPROP . R BUSINESS -SYSTEMS -SUPPLY - -7700034 CITY ENVELOPES/STOCK - 72173 01/29/91 0 T=400=1 208-:430577-00857-7.77-77 4-177-3-71-,1 • . . GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 02/06/91 5”, • 7-.-7 *** VENDOR TOTAL **********************************4444-414444************444********** ' - - . . -35428-- 02/06/91- 1° I I 3154128.*111 2 3 $0.00 02/06/91 " Ill IS 01554- 35928-- 7 $0.00 02/06/91 01554 35928 ,1 $0. 00 02/06/91 " 24 26 01554 35928 $0.00 02/06/91 015521 - 35928 $0.00 02/06/91 . • 1 01554. 35938 $0.00 02/06/91 09565 35929 ' $859.34 02/06/91 1 • f I $455.07 172212/172160 01119- 35929 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 02/06/91 ;* $1,698.81 R- -03847-----001=4002101431-5- -00180 $25.00 DUES/V. ELLEDGE 01/22/91 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP ' V** VENDOR TOTAL $25. 00. 01713 35930 $0.00 02/06/91 R' C. C. U. G. -01-573-----001=7400=210-1-4315 00.179 $25.00 0174D 35931 DUES/V. ELLEDGE 01/29/91 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 02/06/91 fig4 730 , no 61 65 56 67 66 7711 12 73 419 :: 40 fib 3 411) 117) • 41• 14 'Om 3 IS 0 to II IA 13 4 If: m 176 20 23 24 25 36 27 7;Z 211 .50 31 17 13 I a 56 37 311 39 40 42 43 4-4 413 7 46 40 60 51 52 CA L I FORNIA -WATER SERVICE FINANCE -SFA340 TIME -10.20:16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION* CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST. FOR 02/12791- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT 4$ ACCOUNTDESCRIPTION ----**ir-VENDOR TOTAL R C. D. O. A. CONF. REG /L. HARRIS CONF REG/T. THOMPSON 0386 00-F=400-2101-4316---00685---- TR363 02/04/91 210004 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 02/06/91 PAGE 0008 ----DATE-Od/07/ INV/REF PO # CHK # -. AMOUNT UNENCDATEEXP 03856----001=400"210143I6-00688-- • - $125.00' -TR362- -oos62-- TR362 02/04/91 210004 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************************** $250: 00 CA ANIMAL CONT DIRECTORS ASSOC '---"02687------001"400-2401-4315-00022— " * $35.00- DUES/H. L. STATEN .01/29/91 ANIMAL CONTROL /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************4**************************** $35; 00 016163933 - $0.00 02/06/91 R CA" SOC. -0E-MUNICIPAL-FINANCE ---0382 001-400-1202-4316 '00345 $200: 00 -01'33 —359.14 TUITION/MOHLER/GOLEZ 02/04/91 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 02/06/91 .***: VENDOR TOTAL #####**#######***####*41-****W***W#V**####***######***4****441,4414#444-##4 $200:00 -' CALIF BUILDING -CODES -INSTITUTE ......$150.00 - - --- SEM REG/BLDG INSPECTORS 01/17/91 BUILDING /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************4******************************* THE*CALIF-PARK-&-RECT SOCIETY RECREATION INTERN AD -0124 - THE*CALIF PARK-ZIREcTSOCIETV AGENCY DUES/M. ROONEY $150. 00 - :$50:00- ----UL91-01.24 01/17/91 • COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING S ---- —00602- -----'--00-F--:4004601.43-15' —00079-- - -$365:00- 01/29/91 COMM RESOURCES /MEMBERSHIP $415: 00 $0.00 02/06/91 00799- 3593b— $0. oo 02/06/91 $0. 00 02/06/91 • CALIF. PEACE -OFFICERS" ASSOC— -----07796-------001=400,,21014-4315----aoirai- $65. 00 '01-7n DUES/A. ALTFELD 01/30/91 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP- $0.00 • it** VENDOR TOTAL-********.******************************4***************************" ---$65700----- -'...7- 3 34 5 36 WATER BILLINGS/JAN 91 vu016- UOI -400-2 I 0-1. -4303--08038 --$24. 58 tOflo 01/31/91 POLICE /UTILITIES $0.00 02/06/91 S5938 02/06/91 47 411 90 31 52 53 54 55 16 57 38 SO 60 61 92 63 6& 66 67 69 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 70 2 3 12 it 2 14 15 17 8 111 2M 711 i 24 25 271. FINANCE-SFA340 -TIME-10:25: 16 I 31 32 it ail 3!1 37 313 10� 47 44 45 451 .. ,47 49 • **`VENDOR TOTAL"81101*#4t###3t#tF#*###*#########tF'�*#3F�#�Tr'-1r###**�##*#.z..b:##.�F��##at########*.ta"ar• tiso tor PAY VENDOR NAME VND W DESCRIPTION CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/JAN 91 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/JAN 91 -R- 'CALIFORNIA WATER'"SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/JAN 91 DATE-INVC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12/91 -"— ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $* AMOUNT PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00016 001-400-3101-4303" --000131 01/31/91 MEDIANS 00016- -"001-400-4204-4303 00437 01/31/91 DLDG MAINT —700016-- 061-=400-6101-4303 00340 01/31/91 PARKS $673.70 /UTILITIES $468.57 /UTILITIES $1v958"."76- /UTILITIES 1, 958:76 -- /UTILITIES *** -VENDOR TOTAL ****attar-n*ir**** r*** ***-rt-rF#+c#-1}*uat3r->f#-iF#ail ****-soar*">Far****-x*ac*#*-iFartrnir##aratat PAGE 0009 DATE 02/07/41 INV/REF PO 3 CHK #_ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 33, 125. 61 00110 35936 $0.00 02/06/91 00110 35938 $0.00 02/06/91 Z50i fO" 3593B 30.00 02/06/91 R CERTIFIED -OFFICE -EQUIPMENT - 77-0038977-7-001-400-2101-4305-701433. . $95.80 ' -346573466 00111 35439 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 /3466 01/31/91 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 02/06/91 *4* VENDOR TOTAL *********#****at*#********arta*#***#atat*#arras*****ar****ar***##teat**#at**ai**tF $95.80 R"-- CHAMPION CHEVROLET-- '------00014--.._.__.001=4-00-2101-431f `01058 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 01/31/91 POLICE /AUTO R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 -001-400-4204-4111 -00169 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 01/31/91 BLDG MAINT. /AUTO *** VENDOR TOTAL****#####*#aF###*####*t>•*#ae#**ataFtttF�F#it***************aF******at********** R CHARLIE CHAN; INC. 0363477- -" 001-400=4601=4302" 00140 $2,519.09 SPRING BROCHURE PRINTING 2-82C 01/26/91 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING $333. 99 MAINTENANCE $259.40 MAINTENANCE --***.VENDOR TOTAL ####at###************######"##IF#####aFiF#####�t#atiF##artrtt#ittttttr##trtr###tr##tttF CHEVRON USA, INC. MISC. CHCS/JAN 91 $2,519":09 00112 35940 $0.00 02/06/91 00112 35940 $0.00 02/06/91 10982-82C 00777 $2,525.00 00634............170-400-21o3-410 00005 3359.60 01/31/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS /MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES. "--4##•-VENDOR TOTAL` * **********k-****************************************************** - $359:60 'R CITY AND STATE' PUBLICATIONS/FINANCE 23598 02/04/91 03264 . 001%:-400-1202-4316 -00346 $25.00 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 51 5l 3., n+ et 6 7 R' COAST GLASS COMPANY MISC CHARGES/JAN 91 *25. 00 ._..00325-'".---001'=400-4204=4309..."..`01884 7744 01/31/91 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 162323598 00-114.- 3541 02/06/91 11 3 tO 11 12 1.1 15 16 17 1G l2 71 74 7� 211 2, M1, 17 4F SO 31 35942_... _ ^ $0.00 02/06/91 '4 $0.00 ,tl> 35943 7.1 02/06/91 " h3 64 46 67 611 30. 00 02/06/91 VIP 7" 17 /3 74 75 76r 411 :AN ASS 41e. 4111s. 11 9 . • 4 C. Ft tr3 14 15 ;7. I, ;14 ,r. 27 1 5 1, .30 40 t 4, •- 4 41 .65 44, AO 50 51 52 133 54 OS "'NS FINANCE-SFA340 TIME -10:25:16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12791 VND # ACCOUNT.NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT "DATE-INVC - PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DIST/POLICE/JAN 91 -4625 00017- 001400-2101-4304.......00749- 01/31/91 POLICE PAGE 0010 ----DATE 02/077 INV/REF PO 4+ CHK * AMOUNT - UNENC- --DATE EXP - $18.84. -374=4625- -00-1-17 -ST745-- /TELEPHONE $0.00 02/06/91 -------***-vENDOR TOTAL ' R COMMUNICATION SUPPORT CORP. CONSULTING SERV/CABLE TV 6.001 • -02800- --001--2100000-'2110 -04085 $1,000.00 ------ 90006.001 01610--- -35746-- 01/23/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** * * * R VIKI *COPELAND PER DIEM ADVANCE 00041..-- -001-400-1202-4317 TR318 02/06/91 FINANCE $1;000.00 .00076 $100. 00 ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE VENDOR TOTAL R CSULB FOUNDATION - - SEMINAR REG/M. ERNST $100. 0 " 00349 001-400-4601-4316 -00160 $275.00.-- 13399 01/28/91 COMM RESOURCES /TRAINING • *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 VENDOR 01390 01/31/91 001-,400-2101-4311 01054 POLICE $275. 00 $304. 80 /AUTO MAINTENANCE -01390 110;-400-3302-4311- 00662 $304.80 01/31/91 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE TOTAL R DATA SAFE:- - - ' - - TAPE STORAGE/TO 2-11-91 53453 ***'VENDOR TOTAL DE FORD'S BUILDERS' -SUPPLY BOLT CUTTER JAWS/FIRE 09301 .-$6097-60 TR3113 00318 . 35947-* $0.00 02/06/91 13399 .00782- - 35948 $0.00 02/06/91 00120- 35949 $0. 00 02/06/91 12 1 1 S 6 I., 1 0 19 J5 76 -1 I 1,1 11 t4 11 00120- $0.00 02/06/91 SI a .,, .., -00156------001"4001206"4201- -00813 $144.40 --- . 53453 00015 01/12/91 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/06/91 "-- 60 ' 4111. :-.4 ....d -03852------1400-2201=4309- '01026 .' •$47•3_• - - - - - 40930i - if 01/01/91 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 02/06/91 " 67 60 69 77? $144740 73 74 FINANCE-SFA340 iIMEI0:25:16 PAY . VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12793"' VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DA'T'E -INVC "PROJ # ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION #*# VENDOR TOTAL *************# -n**********#*#*******#*********************#***#****** .SUSAN*DEKKF_R CITE PMT REFUND /0660 ..03851- 1 10=300-0000-3302 38252 01/23/91 PAGE 0011 DATE -02/07/91 INV/REF PO # CHK #. AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $47:93- 1.1 $54.00 962862/0660 01129 35952 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 02/06/91 ***-VENDOR TOTAL- 4c -*t#-$# **4444#it:441** #4r*#**#* F -W jF#iii4-##*4#41-***4#-xi##******##*##.3 ****###-u 2A 25 ,2a 27 2a 20 30 54 'DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & SHELTER COSTS/DEC 90 $54.00 . 00'15"4-"-"004=4002401=4253...:..,00149._.-. 01/10/91ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT **4F VENDOR TOTAL ***###'*******##'#'#*:t****# *iF##IF#3f E * * *tt*****##**p..u-#*####-tt-##### DESIGN INSIGHTS `THEATRE LITE'FIXTURES 8613 *4t*' VENDOR TOTAL -********-**44********** **# DIGITAL. EQUIPMENT CORPORATION COMP MAINT/JAN 91 32391 R'-- ' DIGITAL EQUIPMENT- CORPORATION` COMP MAINT/JAN 91 32391 '01452 001=400=4204-4309 01882 01/28/91 BLDG MAINT $370760E- 10 370760 - 10 11 19 10 0 00014 35953 � $0.00 02/06/91 2.3 A $390.58 8613 01078 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4F4t4f*##4F4F***at4t*#-tt,#*#tt*****n-*****•p.##*#* 00269- "---_-_"001 -400-2101=420'1' 00731 01/14/91 POLICE 602-69--700-1-= 4007:220 i=21201- —0Gi97- 01/14/91 .FIRE VENDOR TOTAL *#*#**###****##-zt****#*#***#***************** t*at#*#*####******#*#**** _ -- $806.40 265132391 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $537:60--2b5i3239i /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT EASTMAN -KODAK COMPANY- . . COPIER MAINT/DEC 90 73434 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY COPIER METER USE/NOV 90 73434 $1.344. 00 02840-"-003=400=120.8-4201 . -00727 $269100- 0061173434- 01/06/91 . GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 02840 " 001-400-1208-4201 00728 01/06/91 GEN APPROP $320.26 006M73434 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *'** -VENDOR TOTAL-'#*'##'*4E#*-##4E'*'#***'#'#*##itetlf#" #RziftF*##W#- #4tit **#*## *#***i'i4W41:*4t##*'*4H#** $589:26 R EASTMAN, INC. . _...... -.__-02534-____._,_601=400=1208-4305.-.--- Zf0658. • $975. 53 MISC. OFFICE SUPP/STOCK 01/31/91 GEN APPROP /OFFICE_ OPER SUPPLIES *-**--VENDOR• TOTAL"-##***####*######9F###4F#4t**#4F#'# #'r###"1##4P#4F###4-*##*#**it*4F##4,ii-irt3t4i4i-114t#ft-- EASY READER " • -001BT--'"-"- -00-1-400"-1121-4323" ""'00'124' "" $2.067:76 MISC. CHARGES/NOV-DEC 90 0268 12/31/90 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING $377. 90 35954 02/06/91 00006 35955 $0.00 02/06/91 ' 00006- 35955 $0. 00 02/06/91 ',"; 0.42.26- 35956 $0. 00 02/06/91 01226 $0. 00 35956 02/06/91 411 55 00125 35957 n1 $0.00 02/06/91 °a 0268' -- 01227..-_..... 35958........ $0.00 02/06/91 07 Au C1. :c 71 72 73 7a 75 w x54.4 i. 4. .. 3 � r 4th.;.:. FINANCE-SFA340 `"TIME"10:25:16 12 13 IA IP 7I 2.1 2t 2:• 2., 31 31 3? •3 30 411 41 h2 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT IIATE INVC -'- PROD # "-`ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION PAGE 0012 -DATE-02707791 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNI UNENC DAIL EXP • R EASY READER -- --- " "00I8I'------001_=400-1203-4201 -`'00740' $8.25 -0268-01227 -35958 MISC. CHARGES/NOV-DEC 90 0268 12/31/90 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT$0.00 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL k*************it-*****************1f*** ***********#at* -x#***************, 2 307Ei.: OI _ EDDINGS BROTHERS --'AUTO FARTS -- '"-00I-65-'--"---'00i'=40042055402-`--"00008"- 4788:33T ENG ANALYZER MONITOR 24439 12/27/90 EQUIP SERVICE/EQUIPMENT-MORE THAN $500 _...._._...*** VENDOR TOTAL********************************-************************************ *** BERNARD*FALLON CITE PMT REFUND $788. 33 124439---0I42I-----------35959 $788. 33 02/06/91 --—'a384i—T"—I'I0=300-0000-3302 38251 $18.-00 _..---"----------915150 01604 - 35960 15150 01/29/91 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 02/06/91 VENDOR TOTAL***#ar**tt-********et**************************at******* **ar*********tt*** ' FEDERAL EXPRESS -CORP'. DELIVERY SERV/PUB WORKS 30394 $18. 00 -01962-----3D5=4-00,-8406-,.4201---00031- $22.50.....__ 4-197-30344 d 1471 359-61 01/15/91 . CIP 88-406 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL **************#***************#****** -*3f#***********'#'#************** $22:50 FERRARO DEVELOPMENT-- 03843 - "ODI-2IO-0000=2110 04081 $11575:00------- .-09238' 01347----- 596 __ WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 09238 01/28/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 '*** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** '$1,575:00 . R" GANDALF DATA, INC. - ' MODEM MAINT/JAN-MAR 91 01432-- '001-400=1206-4201 - '00814 $546. 00--- . 43196 00018--;- 7-35963-- 43196 35963-- 43196 01/09/91 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL**3t*********44******4**444**azar#*'**:T*tt**->t*************************** $546: 00 ------- _._..R._. _.._..GATES.; MCD-ONALD--&-COMPANY....---__.--------02538-------705=40-0-1217=420r 00096 _ .--$2J000:00 03-028628 WORK COMP ADMIN/JAN 91 28628 01/15/91 WORKERS COMP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT . *** VENDOR TOTAL..' 44f***4*-***********#* ******fi 1 ***met -*4F *##aFir**ii *ai-**4414************* s . 00044- 355'64 — $0.00 02/06/91 2 3 4 5: a 0 otebi1 12 3 zs 2,, 77 ,1 3.1 :I.1. 45 50 51 n2 54 R'1 ;i GERBER AMBULANCE SERVICE ' ' -02897--"---001-400=2 1 0 1420 1- ' "00723 $313.75 11:696-01126 -n59-65 PRISONER EMERG SERVICES 11696 01/11/91 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/06/91 6(5 i." 70 71 3 4 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME -10:2516 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR -112/12/91 PAGE 0013 ---715AA?-E 627o77Vi VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # "DATE-TNVC -- PROJ # - ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ' 6 7----WIRT VENDOR TOTAL #***•a*********##•H•#*#•X#*##'##'**4*#it#if4t1fitif at#trttat�t#itiiit #it at u�t #ir#ai •6 4 R KRISTINE*GETTEN ` ' *11 12 ------ *** -VENDOR TOTAL 14 Ile —03839 --D01=210-000072110' 04079 $100.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 10565 01/29/91 iF R -NIEL*GILL ' 03845"--..__-0OT-210-0000-2110 04074 - WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 09232. 01/16/91 to iv VENDOR TOTAL'*****]r*1F**-*********3tat****##3F#*3Fif'•i 441.1H44 F41• #*aFiaatat•*i *** i.ir *'i 44:14-- 4*•i"t*# .. __ $1, 950. 00. 3 MO _.... .. ... .. ..._.. __.. ._.._ _._ _...._..-. 4 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP v /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $100. 00--- -- --- -- 10565 - 61-552 3596,S---- $0.00 5966 ---- $0.00 02/06/91 $1,950.00 09232 01546-- 35967' /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE i". -• I GOLDEN STATE FORD -03750-rt.001'-400-6101-5403 00010 $11,468.99 1991-1/2 TON PICKUP/PKS. 00526 01/07/91 PARKS /VEHICLES 2 -----..***--VENDOR TOTAL***#***#i.4r3t#iFtFi:****at****-*-4 *-i it###•ir+r-T*#af*ar *ir+r********************** iii 31 Al.** VENDOR TOTAL.**#**&**4-44*#*;fik*******#4af44F4ww*IFaF#*##*****'******atat•itat*iT.*ai:ri*.rtatit.:yi,.if.** 40,12 $11: 468. 99 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFCRS ASSOC "00059'-'-`"001=400-1202-4336.. 00344' $16.00 PUBLICATIONS/FINANCE 54799 01/15/91 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING $0.00 02/06/91 $0.00 02/06/91 N00526 01406 35968 $11,496.00 02/06/91 9 figl w n I f! If. r .11 54799 613.19---- .35969 .. :,-, 0 411 4, .12 43 44 45 411 4V 80 54 GOVT ACCT STANDARDS BOARD PUBLICATIONS/TREASURER 41-45: 00 '00739 ' 001=400--1141-4316 00041 $16.00 01/16/9.1 CITY TREASURER /TRAINING *4* VENDOR-TOTAL********'*********#**#•Ifif*#*#***#'*4** 41s4v4f4* ***iI#*iftt# 4 tfif4aF* •5fir*aHi.*-.$16.0Ci-__..... EQUIP RENT/DEC90-JAN 91 78983 ._II1340-- 01/01/91 001=400=2101=4304 - 00749 POLICE $103.12 /TELEPHONE 1F** -VENDOR TOTAL*4f**#***4t*#iF#�u4f******ir**###it*********ir-ir**it4*ai•*****#itif**4*afif#irir*it 01945 35970 $0.00 02/06/91 1279983 66'34-7- . 35971 .._ $0.00 02/06/91 H.9: R H. I3: PARTNERSHIP- _ 0000-2115 04693 $; 75.00 95627 01536 35972 X3834 .._.__..001--2'10 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 95627 01/16/91',/DEPOSITS/WORK. GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 -- **--VENDOR'TOTAL***##*#*##*4*4far4t#*4f**##a>#4f#4#* *'**4daW4-411*4tf#**4t*********ir.********.p.* HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. ELGIN SWEEPER PARTS $375. 00 00731- -' "- � " 001=400-3103-4311 ' 00640- $90.41- 16080 01/02/91 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE ft 6/f Gl 40 1016080 • 01422_...'_..35973. ;I $74.71 02/06/91 FINANCE-SFA340 O(; I2 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • • 0 17 40" I5 4110 If. 111 19 70 1, fl •,:• • 1. F311 3) 31.1 40 • 41 42 4J a4 40 40 • • .1n ..._---_. ar**--VENDOR TOTAL' ***************************#-**** *'#I#4#'*#*****#'**** f****** *****##** ... . $17S73."90 -. • SG 01 d4 ..__ ._ ... .... CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12/91 • VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE-INVC • PROJ 1# ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION --- ***'VENDOR TOTAL******#*****#•#*#*##**#*******#***###***'#*#*#*##****#*#***#*4**4#*4* • PAGE 0014 --DATE-0270779r- INV/REF PO # CHK # ' - AMOUNT UNENC---_-DATE-EXP - $90:-41 R HARBOR CITY ENTERPRISES, INC.- -0357I'---0017--400,-2101-4311 `-- 01057'" - $592.00 24549724516 MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 24516 01/31/91 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** "VENDOR TOTAL **** +•+a4****#####*#• #******* -**********#x -u -##*##ac -##****####aa#** -it#### a•### $592. 00 " LAURETTA#HARRIS-- ' -" —02624-----0014-400-2101-,.4316 """00693' $103.00 PER DIEM ADVANCE TR363 02/04/91 210004 POLICE /TRAINING -._--._-._.*** VENDOR TOTAL*******************************'****'****-***************************** R HERMOSA NAIL -CO. $103. 00 —03124-----001210-0000-2110 04087" $2.50.00 --- BANNER ' ' BANNER DEPOSIT REFUND 09920 01/31/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE a0I7& — 35974 — $0.00 02/06/91 ' .. 'TR363 00363--"..- 35975-- $0.00 02/06/91 .__--'-"-"*** VENDOR TOTAL'************#*#####**•*#*****#******###*###*#at##*###########*#####** • R HOZIES RADIATOR -SERVICE' RADIATOR RECOR/UNIT HB -3 96154, HOZIES RADIATOR'SERVICE " RADIATOR RECORE/SUBARU 91574 ' $250.-00 --" ... __Q027T-�-a01=400=2101--43fI _._..-O'I056 $127. 25 01/10/91 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 002// ----00T=400-240Y-4311- 00224' $1r0.49- 12/03/90 ANIMAL CONTROL /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL**********#***#***#*******#****'#********#*******#******************* ' "-INGLEWOOD-TRANSMTSSION - "'. TRANS OVERHAUL/HB-3 4615 -" ---._02095-- --001=400-2I01-43IT ' 01/24/91 POLICE $237:.74... 01055 ' '3865.35 - /AUTO MAINTENANCE -__._-_._...***-VENDOR TOTAL-#**********'**#*##*#***#**•&#*****##�F**######•u#*******444**Y####*#->t**# - INGLEWOOD"WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 R -.- INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE -ELECTRIC'''` MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 (12458- R 245S • 01/31/91 -----02458----- 01/31/91 00I=400-4204-,-'4309-7-01880 BLDG MAINT $865:.33. /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 0UI=400=6101-4309- 01003 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 'R ISLAND STYLE -CONSTRUCTION" WORK GUARANTEE REFUND' 95619 09920 11062 35976- $0.00 02/06/91 961-54 _(1747- '35977_-...- 3127.25 02/06/91 -41574-. -002d0 — 3597T $110.49 02/06/91 4615 -009987-- $S66.00 ' 00998-"- 3866.00 02/06/91 . 00f74-----M597/7-- $0.00 0f74 ------35979---- $0.00 02/06/91 0 9 10 I1 12 iit 1r. • 31 l4 l5 lM1 1.1 .11 I7 alb 47 5)I f! S'I an 5q r.0 00174. -35979 11l $0.00 02/06/91 _.__.._.Zf32SI-__...__.DOS=21'0'-•.0000-21.1.0_.___234094._ _........_ ._....$375."a0_-.-.-".-------'-'9531t3.._alS'3F�--._'35�i30 --- 01/16/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 67 ao 410 4Y 40 IRAS 21 FINANCE—SFA340 'TIME -10:25:16 3 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 7 11 12 11 14 1D t.1 1_ az in nn 43 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST --FOR 02/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION * VENDOR TOTAL *** ************'reg************ ***##***. *##************4#*#4#* ***** R J & M ASSOCIATES 03835 001-210-0000-2110 04095 WORK GUARANTEE_ REFUND 95618 01/16/91 PAGE 0015 • ---DATE-0-2707791- 2 INV/REF PO # CHK # 3 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP .. • *375:00 '. $375.00 95618 01534 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL 444-*********#*4*•u***•tt.*#***IF#**a€iF*#"# # #u44:44 ***4*a•*4#44441:44*4*4u#* #375: 00 • J. J. PARTNERSHIP WORK. GUARANTEE REFUND 03833" ' 001=210-0000-2110 04092 01/16/91 95628 $350.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE ** -VENDOR TOTAL" at*##"tt##*# F*tt*4 ********aF#Ii* ##-#ti'4Wtt f**-4***44**x•*"1t*at**at** 444'it*#*tt*** DONALD*JONES PER DIEM/HOTEL ADVANCE $350:00-:- 02627 350:00 02627 001=400-2101-4312 01632 $393.75 01/28/91 POLICE /TRAVEL. EXPENSE POST *** VENDOR TOTAL ****'ieat'+Fit#***'x'*it**u*******'***************it*************4itni64*****it* KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER SEMINAR REG/S. LAWRENCE 'R KEYE'PRODUCTIVITY CENTER SEMINAR REG/M. ERNST • -01871 '001-400.1207-4316 00065 01/28/91 . BUS LICENSE -0187I...-...-"".'"'001400=4601=431:6 -`00161 12/06/90 COMM RESOURCES $393.75 $98.00 /.TRAINING $98. 00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL*********4*4**4*************************************4*44*4* 4****4** " COMMANDER-MICHAEL*LAVIN . REIMB TUIT/BOOKS/SPR 90 "----00792------001"-----400:'•210-1;:43 1 —00681 01/24/91 POLICE $196. 00 -$308.25— /TRAINING. $308.25. -./TRAINING. VENDOR TOTAL 9t*****"It*****#***3t'it?t#**tF3i-*eF-itdF##'i't t'4F***4iF*#****"iFiNt******4bt****4it'rt****•u -R SHERRIA*ERWRENCE' "'"--' " -03044 061-400-1207=4336 00064 REIMB BOOKS/SPRING 90 01/31/91 BUS LICENSE **' VENDOR TOTAL ####****iF*4$**4*****4**44**'444#4*44*it*4#aF*4**********4*44**#**�r*****.. $309. 25 $7E:53 /TRAINING $72.53 LAWRENCE "WELK—RESORT "THEATRE . " —17---03253----7001=400:--4601-4201---00129 -_ $929: 00 -- TICKETS/SENIOR TRIP 01/15/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT l.a.'s.:,Y'Yt-. A`:" --.:aa „'.: �.•.�:yi: .r tpa,,.::k'. vQe��. a,+• .r �� .,:, K'Itia.:.% t ,3ft4t'L .r.l'l'i'�� .•�{t t w �'�In. ��l�tadd�i 35991 " 11 12 In 02/06/91 "" 17 IFl IA 95628 01537 35982 $0.00 02/06/91 01233 .35983 *0.00 02/06/91 11047 359.84 $98.00 02/06/91 00781.. .....-35984 $0. 00 02/06/91 • 01718 35985 lay* $0.00 02/06/91 ro 11060 — 35986 . '•- $0.00 02/06/91 00797 •____ 5 _8_j n $0.00 02/06/91 6€.. w ft )/ ..1 c::. r., "•.Ica.: CIT.Y OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST i IME 10': 23: I6 -•--- ...____:._..-_.__....._.... 'FOR 02/12/91' -----_-.---- ; PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION` ' ' " . DATE-TNVC- PROJ # "ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC—DATE PAGE 0016 ----DATE- 0270T/91 ----***-VENDOR TOTAL************#*#*********###*#***####'**•****#*##***#*###*##****#*###*$925700 Ici P; 3r. -R -LAWSON CONSTRUCTION —U3B44 -7001=210-0000=2130 04082 $11575.00 017233 0Tb43 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 09231 01/16/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 3101.. IS VENDOR TOTAL.*#*#***#**#**#*####*#*#*#'*#*'#****#'***#*##*####*#**#*###*#****###***# $i, 575700 IH 1N R LAWSON PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED -00076-001.-400-4204-4321 00544 $554.93 - - • 0551960 01412 35989 SAFETY SUPPLIES/PUB WORK 51960 12/19/90 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $515.18 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****#*it****##•u•*#*+r-##•uq•at#*#o##*#'#'• ** u#*•u#it+t*#taat•q•**##*it#**q•****3E*•tae# *** KATHLEEN*LEACHMAN "RELEAF" CERTIFICATES KATHLEEN*LEACHMAN-""-- TYPESET SPRING BROCHURE $554:93 •" 01409.-'- - 001-400-4601=4302 00137 $106. 50 01/07/91 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING -01409- —001=400-4601=4302- _... 00138._ $532:50- -- 01/25/91 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING VENDOR TOTAL ##*###*##tt-*##*#*****##• ##•tt-- ##***• *##*###*####*#*****-** t#*#*#**#*•rc*** $639. 00 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES"" "' " ---0031'T" "---001 400=4202-431T"--`"00062 ' ' - . $135:"'00- 32 CONF REG/A. ANTICH TR364 02/04/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 33 *** VENDOR TOTAL#*******#*****************4**********#**************4*#*******444#*# $135.0-0 1" 17 sn +w -'o 46 ",47 02/06/91 6 6 00779 . .:35990---,; $106.75 02/06/91 " ' -00758-----35790--- $533.75 _..00758......._--35990---- $533.75 02/06/91 3.. TR364 00364 35991._-. $0.00 02/06/91.. ANNE*LOCKE--- ------ ..__. 03216--"" -001=210-0000'-2I10 --04088 ... $50.00.---- • - 10199 01553-- 359 -92. -.- REDO WARR LOST IN MAIL 10199 01/31/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL *****************************##'####4*##-it**-********4#4#iEui'tli-ii4 t*##4** $50:00- LOS 50: 00.. LOS ANGELES -CU -MARSHALLS'' -OFF: ' 03849 - ""-001=400=2101=430'3- . "0-1432 11058 35993 SMALL CLAIMS COURT FEES 01/31/91 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 02/06/91 "' LOS "ANGELES -CO' -MARSHALLS'- OFF. -03849- 001=400-4202=4305 '00546 $40: D0 11058 35993 SMALL CLAIMS COURT FEES 01/31/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 02/06/91 ' ' LOS ANGELES "CO' MARSHALL'S' OFF. —03849----------001---400"460E-4305-7-00922- - - $40.00 SMALL CLAIMS COURT FEES 01/31/91 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 11050..-..- -----3599 ---- *0. 00 . 02/06/91 50 61 67 - 6.1 06 57 44 541 60 If 71 73 731 75 I (1 r -- 1, 2 3 4' 57 e lu FINANCE-SFA340 TIME -10:25:16 �14 111 t s. /s 17 1a 19 20 23 7e 7,1 40 • • 12 1t .3a 37 40'10 1'! 4. .'<41 42 A3 V 4n 45 nn 41" s7 40 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12791^ VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT ..GATE-INVC PROJ # -ACCOUNT-DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*4******iFiF*444•k***********####****##******#.p.***********u.*##******* t LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT TUITION/D. JONES 00718 001-400-2101-4316 00689 $100.00 01/28/91 POLICE /TRAINING * * VENDOR TOTAL*#k**#***********************iF******************ar***************-*** LOUIS THE TAILOR INC. - MOTORS JACKET/RICKEY 98927 ----R LOUIS THE TAILOR; INC; MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 " 00079- -:001=400-2101-4187 00404 01/15/91 POLICE PAGE 0017 DATA 02%077%91 INV/REF PO # CHK # _ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $400. 31 _ /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE -00074- -001-400-2101-4187 -00405 $148.28-- - 01/31/91 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************-u******************44***************************** -MAC WAREHOUSE - MACINTOSH SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL 53001 $548. 59 2 3 6 s 10 01234 35994 $0. 00 - 02/06/91 398927 00997 35995 $400. 31 02/06/91 00141 $0. 00 --0391-07---'--00T=400-'2101-4305 01429 - $241.00-- 0F35053001 01715 12/14/90 POLICE ✓OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 *****#*#***#**************jt******** **" t** ** ***tea#*-n**it##ir*gin** MAIN ELECTRIC_'SUPPLY- MISC CHARGES/JAN 91 73625 $241. 00 --00426`---_ 105=400=2601-4309.-_ .-00692 01/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************#**####************************** 40 50 R— M. A. *MAJKFi'�--' WORK GUARANTEE REFUND '66.24 35995- 02/06/91 I 35996 02/06/91 17 10 10 71 v •. 73625 00142 35997 $0. 00 02/06/91 03831-"--00T=2-10-00002[10---04091--- -$375.00 ` 0924E1 01541 -3-5-9-4g-- 09248 01/16/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL*#*******************************************ar*********************** ---11:444C CASKILL '03832 -46011-'3000000-383/ WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 09219 01/16/91 B. *MC CASKILL WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 09219 $375. 00 00812 $1,575.00 ---- 09219 _.•. _ ••' 09219 01538 - - /STREET CUT INSPECTION $0.00 03832 -- . 001=300--0000-3831 00813 $375.00 01/16/91 /STREET CUT INSPECTION ** VENDOR TOTAL #**#####*"*4•IF**44#**444# 4 •p*'4#4-4itTF:tW*#*.rEIF**.*******.***.N**.***.***.;E*.*.* R MERRELL PAINT COMPANY AIRLESS SPAINT SPRAYER 40160 00087-----001-400-4204-5402 -00002 $1,757.25 01/17/91 BLDG MAINT/EQUIPMENT-MORE THAN $500 35994.-- 02/06/91 5999- 02/06/91 09219 01539 35999 $0.00 02/06/91 11-40160 01456 36000 $1,761.38 02/06/91 50 5. 7,• • • M1'41 ,{l fix 41.1, ii.,..'4•,,-1'111 a 14 II 13 3 14 15 I C. I, IC 70 71 13 i - !P 27 20 2G 30 31 37 33 34 3!1 3a 110 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 40 FINANCE-SFA340 --TIME-10:25:16 PAY VENDOR NAME - DESCRIPTION -- C I TY ESCRIPTION-- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0018 FOR 02 /12791 ------ -'—DAIh 02707/41 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE-INVC'"— 'PROJ # '-ACCOUNT'DESCRIPTION ------7*** - VENDOR TOTAL' #;t•#•tt•********• *****3s •- .#.x.# #at•#' *•at•' *#atm*****,**•u••tt•it###•ttjt###-##IF#it#'#at•###it• ' R VALERIE*MOHLER REIMS BOOKS/SPRING 91 INV/REF PO # CHK # --.----___--AMOUNT-UNENC DATE tXFr— $1, 757 25' -"'0095.6—" "--001=400-1202-43I6 00348 $162. 03 02/04/91 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING •- -*** VENDOR TOTAL -**#•m*•tt•**•u****• **###******at•##'######'•ra#'#' #******######*4***#•N•######### R MONTEREY SHERATON HOTEL "02712—" "`001-400-4202-4317` '00061 HOTEL ADVANCE/A. ANTICH TR364 02/04/91 PUB WKS ADMIN $162:03-- $326. 70 _-...-.__ _. 'TR364- /CONFERENCE TR364`/CONFERENCE EXPENSE -_--_.--***' VENDOR TOTAL *##****#**#######• *#**#•**** *##*#**# ######****#*#*-#*'#***•u##**##### $326:70- R K. #MUCKERSIE 2 34 z- 7 4.9 410 ti 9 0 e 01.130 36001 $0.00 02/06/91 $0.00 02/06/91 03836 001-210--0000-2110 04076 $50.00 12069 01549-_. .'36003 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 12069 01/29/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 -_-----.---'***' VENDOR TOTAL ***-****#**'•u•*• atit•x••##•x••u••x•tF*#*****•u•##'•u•**-41. •****•tt-#* •tt•uat•u##i!••ftiV. ir•u•;r#+r#####4 $50. 00.... . _ ... G. *NEIL COMPANIES - 03541-----001400-1203-4305- 00295 $293. 85 .. " - 0120101. 01 01322---7-- '36004 -- EMPLOYEE RECORD CARDS 01.01 01/14/91 PERSONNEL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $284.78 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************#al****#ac•'; **-******* ********4***** ***** ## R JAMES*NELSON - - ---•03827'._. '-'"'110-300-0000=3302. 38254 $28: 00 - - ' . 888384 01602-., . 36605 CITE PAYMENT REFUND 88384 01/29/91 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 02/06/91 _- -- ***-_VENDOR' TOTAL-*******#'*acct•**iv##***####*4#w#'*##****:*'#iF*'#iF##*#ti#**####-**#*#"*#•k'#it#### . 46 60 51 57 C $28:00._-_.._._ _. NORTHSIDE"VETERINARY CLINIC 03477- -OOI 00-2101=4201 ---`00727--- ' ' ' $73.06 `20554 K--9 EVALUATION EXAM 20554 12/31/90 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/06/91 -VENDOR TOTAL OLGUIN=RUTHERFORD-- $73.00 - 01917— 001-21D-0000-2116 —04575 €75.60— 0 257 01546 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 09257 01/28/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 If** VENDOR TOTAL ***** *******4 * ******V4V41*#*#iE* iF#it-1}* *# #ifirik-##"ifir•#-#* iEli'# **ifi}##**ir __._.... _..__ –$75700– 2 3 ir. i7 In 19 20 21 73 7; 26 2, •12 34 4: ii 51 57 511 - GARY'1L #OL-SON`T" CITE PMT REFUND 34603 36007 02/06/91 U:id40 71-ru=-30D-00250-3302 38250 $46.66 -834663- 01603 36008 01/29/91 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0-00 02/06/91 60 6 534 65 66 67 lir 611 ea FINANCE-SFA340 —TIME -'I0: 25: 16 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12791-- PAGE 2/1279f PAGE 0019 —D -ATE 62/07T91-- 2 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE-YNVC- PROJ # ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION -'#ic• -VENDOR TOTAL _.##*##dE##W*4#*#444*4**4**4 # #c4 #44# ii"#444W##**4***##4 *4* ***#***** ' $46. 00- ID VENDOR TQTAL"'**##**'#*##4#F##aFIF4#tE4aF###*#####ASF#####4##44;r##ir;i44ta#**#iF#at u# 4220 l• - • PACIFIC DELL TELEPHONE- COMP'HOOKUPS/JAN 91 00321--- —001=400-2101-4304* .._ ' -001=400-2101-4304 * 00747 $162. 82 01/01/91 POLICE /TELEPHONE 4** VENDOR TOTAL ,u-#4• #1* -*****441- ### ##it*#4##4irai***444444r** **4444**4E#444 444: t ## 44*4(4 R..._...._.-PACTEL -CELLULAR MOBILE PHONE CHGS/JAN 91 $i 62. 82` ..._ ._03209-....._._. 061-=400-2101-4304 00745 $630. 10_.:. - 01/31/91 POLICE /TELEPHONE - PAGENET REPLACE STOLEN PAGER $630 -T0 - AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 3 4 3 6 ' 00036- - 36001, __ $0.00 02/06/91 00150-- $0.00 0150 _. 36010 $0.00 02/06/91 02487 705-400--1210-4324 00053 $180.41 10114234 00990 -36011 14234 12/03/90 AUTO/PROP/BONDS /CLAIMES/SETTLEMENTS $0.00 02/06/91 #*# VENDOR TOTAL 4** ***4 ****4#*•44** *Arlt441-4***-4**4441x444* ********* **4444:****flair# $180. 41. PAK WEST 00519 -- 001-400-4204-4309 01881 $169.74 741895 01440 - 36012 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 41095 12/28/90 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $169.75 02/06/91 ***-VENDOR TOTAL`**##*4#***************#*****************************#**it***********# $169.74- PEP 169-74. PEP BOYS MISC CHARGES/JAN 91 J 10 II • 17 1, 10 18 10 • 21 22 2.1W 24 25 ,: v •w ,10 -70060E1--_--1-130=400--3102-4311 00141 $-47.87 15767 00153 73-6613' 15767 01/31/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/06/91 14 #** VENDOR"TOTAL'**4**#'##444fF##if4*#4##4tr##3€ *#4"tF# 4*#*****#4###4#*****#*#:p.#:u#*###*.b _ X47:-87--'-•------_ ... .1H1 PHOENIX GROUP ._02530----.x..11-0=4D0-3302=4201-----00264 $1,056.00-- - 5147,-00- 00063... —16614-- - - OUT OF STATE CITES/DEC90 47-00 12/3119CL PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/06/91 ' **VENDOR TOTAL ##_##4## '##44'##'4iF-44##'3t44#-#W# *-#4 F#4 4# 4####4tt*****4-*T#4i *.*****#*#4# —$1705E-00- - R.P.M. -ENTERPRISES 03846 OYFI-230-0000--2n0"_----_04083.------ $1, 575. U0 - - jg608 01533 - 36015 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 95608 0 1/16/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 ***-VENDOR TOTAL---*- ##*#*#*##*•)f*#'#4#**** #1f#-**11**#44#*ItTt##'#-#4##*ri##Itk4it*44144*at##-#'4#444* - R RADIO -SHACK MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 OI429 _001.=400•-12064309- --00162 $7:'22- -- _ ._. _.._._ _..-__ . 00i55"._..-36010 01/31/91 DATA PROCESSING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 02/06/91 5/4 41 5,4111% 115 88 FINANCE-SFA340 3 _ PAY VENDOR NAME _....._. . DESCRIPTION'..... --- 32 33 s4 15 .36 37 45 44 45 n 47 48 50 51 RADIO SHACK"-------- MISC. HACK"--"---MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 RADIO SHACK _-"' MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 RADIO SHACK' .... MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST - FOR 02/12/91---- �' - VND #, ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE-TNVC PROJ # -A CCOUNT"DEbt,RIPTION PAGE 0020 ----DATE-0270779 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT U •--0-1-429-------0014;400-2201-4309 '--131028 _-01429----001 400-2201-4309--'0I028-_ . -_. $33.97-..--."--- 01/31/91 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 02/06/91 -01-4dY 001=400-4205=4309 U0524-- $115:65 --06155 26016 01/31/91 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 02/06/91 ...-'01429-.._-'...'105-400=2601=4309 -00691:- 01/31/91 ...-00691 01/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL ##**4444##*###*#- #- ###***#*##*#**#-## t ####*4#*###*##### ##**##ff*#*###* RAINBOW CAMERA-&r'VIDEO'•' MISC. CHARGES/DEC 90 • R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/DEC 90 RAINBOW CAMERA"& VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/DEC 90 RAINBOW CAMERA'& VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/DEC 90 $160. 02 • -00155--7-'3601Z-- $0.00 ------'3601.--_Y$0.00 02/06/91 - 170173 DOI'=400-2101=4306 _..__.00920 - ._ _ . . -388. 62 - _._-•--•----.---._....-.--- 01256 -3 12/31/90 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/06/91 "'00173 —001-400-2201-4305-00433 12/31/90 FIRE "00173-.-- -" .001=400-4101-4305'-'" 00498' 12/31/90 PLANNING $24.02 ' /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $25.09 . /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES -00T73----700I=40046011,4305- -00924-'7 12/31/90 • COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE ----' *** -VENDOR ' TOTAL '• #'****#***#*##*##*'###*###aF#*w*#'*##*#### ##*#**#3tat##aF 4##iF# ##4x #*## . ' -'R RED LION INN' HOTEL ADVANCE/L. HARRIS TR363 OPER SUPPLIES $202:73 11311W -' -U01=4002101=4316- -00684 $278. 58 ." --- 02/04/91 210004 POLICE /TRAINING "#*.VENDOR TOTAt- #######' +##########'### #4'## 3F # ### #3i##4-####4414- # -' -_ -_ - .---$278-58- • ---------R--7 RED LION --.INN 03655 HOTEL ADV/T. THOMPSON TR362 02/04/91 001-400-2r0j=431A— _D y697 _. _...-----. _ . $278:58---- 210004 POLICE /TRAINING ***-VENDORTOTAL--#f**at#######*#at#'it########"##*##'###at**aF#1t3F#*aF#3t####tF#####IF it##ittrat##ff##3t CITY* OF*REDONDO -BEACH WAVE FARES/JUL-DEC 90 CITY--'OF#REDONDO BEACH''. WAVE COSTS/JUL-DEC 90 0-176-3 --T45=300-00003854---00054' 01/25/91 " '01'763""' -- T4S=400=3401-4201----'- 00190 01/25/91 SHUTTLE/DIAL s278:8...... -34; 579: D8CR /FARES, DIAL A RIDE '359,762;6r- /CONTRACT 359,762:727'/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 01256 ---1'3Z017--- $0.00 .._ - 36017_-..._$0.00 02/06/91 01256 30. 00 -360r7-- 02/06/91 36017_._02/06/91 01256 36017 30.00 02/06/91 TR363 00363 36018 30. 00 02/06/91 2 3 4 6 8 10 11 12 14 10 113 70 21 2.2 23 24 25 26 27 2 19 34 40 41 43 nn 45 4/ 40 46 50 51 - TR362 D'0362 --"-36-619- $0.00 6-619-$0.00 02/06/91 '4 .10894 33020 $0.00 02/06/91 56 511 60 eel 10894"__ _.- 36020 $0.00 02/06/91 6766 68 70 71 72 73 74 75 70 • 40 40 0 2 3 6 7 I2 011 it 2 '..3 011 20 21 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME -10-f25:16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12/9f AMOUNT -------***• VENDOR TOTAL "## •####*#"########******44*##-#*#1F#*if'fF#3Fat###*#•tt# *** #•#•p•*p.*tt.p.*.p..a-##.b..# 31 Cyl2 33 1.1 - 141 36 R ROSARIO*RUIZ 03837`"-- --001=210-0000-2110 -04077 01/29/91 PAGE 0021 —DATE`02/07/91 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC - DATE EXP $55, 183. 59 $100.00' DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 10507 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE ***"VENDOR TOTAL***•-+F*#*#i[•-x##•a*###at##at•x-at###a****#dt****##•rl it#•x••q•#*3t•q#**44x4-41-t•i******** *** RUSHER AIR CONDITIONING AIR COND/PD COMP ROOM 10106 R RUSHER'AIR--CONDITIONING AIR COND/JAIL AREA 10107 VENDOR TOTAL -03726- . . ` -305=400-8604-420i ' -00005 01/30/91 CIP 86-604 --0-372'6.-.--305=400-8604-4201---00006- 01/30/91 CIP 86-604 3100.00 $ 5, 880. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT __ '- ..... - $9, 990. 00' /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ********* ***************4.#4#*## #************4*#**#********** $15,870.00 R ED*RUZAK 1,; ASSOCIATES ENGRG SERV/DEC 90- -*** VENDOR TOTAL 01578 --001-400-3104-4201 - 00076 90488 01/01/91 - TRAFFIC SAFETY 2 3 146 4 3 0 '10507 01.550 36021 30.00 02/06/91 1) I6 ,1 7,1113 10106 00971 36022 ,1 $5,800.00 .02/06/91 .I� 1•i0101'''009136022 $9, 990. 00 02/06/91 $1,562.50 90488 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ***#***#**** 4****************4'444/4****************'#*#****4*#**** * $1,562.50 SAFETY-KLEEN"CORPORATION —03428 603=400-2201=4-309-'01027- -. PAINT THINNER/FIRE DEPT 29064 01/14/91 FIRE R SAFETY-KLEEN'CORPORATION ' PAINT THINNER'& DISPOSAL 15214 $-8.4. 33 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 03428 --7---001=400--:31044309.--00632 $400.32--- 11/27/90 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 3; _.-***--VENDOR -TOT-AL--********3t*3F****3F*****#***3 r # **#'*3F'* **#*#*#*#*##1t• # # ********'## - $484.65 10 R 10 441 42 3--"'—***--VENDOR..TOTAL'-#*#it•3F##*,4r*###1-*#*###W##-31-1 3t**#it#*##** #**• #************************ J ,rt ..i MICHAEL*SCHUBACH -MONTHLY EXPENSE/JAN 91 00536-----00140U-4101-431-6---00204 01/31/91 - PLANNING • $12.00 -- /TRAINING 4:. 42 `1C Al '11 04 6.3 66 r ats 22IftI -- - SINCLAIR PAINT -DO: - MSc CHARGES/JAN 91 00979 VENDOR ----- $f2:-00 01461 36023 $0.00 02/06/91 M29064 ' .1 1249 ' . 36024 $84.33 02/06/91 315214 -01404 -' 36024 $400.32 02/06/91 0139=7__..-..-_.-(301_=400-4204-4309... -01885 $95: 90 -'25::00971 01/31/91 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS TOTAL-*********************•*****-f*47* F##-ii3f•f 4###444#ft;i*44W44*****#444 • SIR SPEEDY ENVELOPES/PKG RENEWALS 12860 00361 -110-400-3302-4305` 00766 $424:88" 01/16/91 424: 88- 01/16/91 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 44 ;"1 10891 36025 $0.00 02/06/91 1I�) 00159 36026 $o. 00 02/06/91 12860 01609 36027 $425.88 02/06/91 57 111 !4 ca A, '.1 644 .17 3114, '1 4111,. >2 !1 74 :S 0 3 7 0 il 1♦ 15 21 z l 4 25 26 27 a1 30 31 37 33 34 35 30 34 40 4' 47 a 44 45 40 47 40 43 5', 51 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME -10: 25:16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02112/91�- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE'INC"V ' PROJ # 'ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION —***'VENDOR TOTAL######4F#####�c#####*#tr#######' **a�#######*#####*###*#**##*4444#######* SMART & FINAL -IRIS COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 -SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 PAGE 0022 —DATE -132707747-1 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT"UNENC BATE EXP $424:88 "' dOIT4—_` 00I=�Fd6=2101-4305' 0d9I8 $99.39--------- 01/31/91 . POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE "0051'4--`-'"-001'=400-4601-4308-----00503 -` - ' .. "'$99: 34- 01/31/91 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL######4t-################################41######4##################414# $198.73 00360- 36023--- $0.00 02/06/91 -003'60------3-6020— $0.00 02/06/91 SO CALIF' RAPID --TRANSIT DISTR. ----00843-----14-5=400"3403-4251---00092-"---- %I, 588. 00' "'53926 -0I'6'06--'--' -36029_.—' BUS PASS SALES/DEC 90 53926 01/17/91 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 02/06/91 - ### VENDOR TOTAL******#*####*####4###4##########'##4########4#4#4#41########414#4141***** $1,588.00 -R""- SOUR ISSEAU'-SUPPORT-SERVICES' BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION 1754 SOURISSEAU'SUPPORT"SERVICES BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION 1758 --02075-' -001-400-2101-4201'- 00726 01/22/91 POLICE 02075"---001=400=2101-4201 ----00728'- 01/11/91 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $210.00-------- -'--_..-. --- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ---"-- -. ###"-VENDOR TOTAL- ###*##**##*#-# F####*# 1 -**W* f'#�f###3F#�fiF#'####'iF#414#4#4111-##########'�F**#-***4. -' -'- - $306.-00- R... SOUTH BAY' HOSPITAL ---" BUI07 -0III_..-. 400-2101-4201 -00725-. - _.- .. .$11-9: 77- -- ----- -_ - BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING 01/30/91 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 'Ivy -VENDOR TOTAL'-##'#4F####'iE##*######4#*#�FiF3F'*414r4HFir4F###4F4F#3E4F##'*#####4e#####&'4F�F#"###4##4t### _...- $119._77 SOUTH -BAY MUNICIPAL ''COURT CITATION COURT BAIL 00404- 110=300-0000=3302'- --38253 01/31/91 �BiS:`00" /COURT FINES/PARKING 3 ----if -VE1111OR "TOTAL' -f######4f454f####*##3F####iEi14F4F#3F#4Fff#-*$-#4i-4fi1##*if if* ##4t##41##4t####41#if###4t#4f 4t# 54 15 SOUTH BAY-WELDERS----- MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 SOUTH -BAY WELDERS - MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 00018 001-4130 2203 -4309 01/31/91 FIRE 00018- 001=4.00-3101=4309 01/31/91 MEDIANS $818: 00 - 0T029 $34.61- /MAINTENANCE 34.61/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1754 -017-1b----- - 36030- $0.00 02/06/91 _.1758 01724— 36030 . $0.00 02/06/91 2 3 5 7 10 til 12 13 14 6 IB 10 70 21 72 7:1 23 26 70 22 30 31 11 34 01728---- _.36031-7--- $0.00 02/06/91 0ib2� 3032 $0.00 02/06/91 00162 36033 $0.00 02/06/91 0- 0085 $13:.95- -0016-2- -36023 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0 00 0 43 57 50 60 61 62 6.1 63 66 67 80 jal /4 /6' 410 sLO 3 A 20 21 fel 30 31 4032 33 FINANCE-SFA340 r IME' --10: 25: 16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12191 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 4 AMOUNT ..__"DATE'"INVC-•---` PROJ 4 "-ACCOUNT- "DESCRIPTION PAGE 0023 DATe 02/07/9r INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP SOUTH BAY -WEEDERS - -_.._..__000f6— 003=400=-3103-4309--01-098 $13. 95 - MISC. CHARGES/JAN 91 01/31/91 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ########-ir#4•!t*#"ir*at#a*****#il-•it3r:)rp•#ai•#•u3i•it#*#Ir#4**#•aaril-***asst•ir#*4•is•*414tt##•xtf•>*# $62. 51 SOUTHERN- CALIFORNIA` EDISON CO. ---700442-----I054002601-4303---D0279--- $14, 237: 01 - STREET LITE BILLS/DEC 90 12/31/90 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES — -**f' VENDOR TOTAL###tF#######+F#3F######d•###Ifa6#+F#IF4• #114144#4'it#Tr#arts•#•is-ir#**:•itu•iF#ai•at##4is•1i4#•iF:44 X14, R SOUTHERN -"CALIFORNIA -GAS' CO. GAS BILLINGS/JAN 91 00162 36033 $0.00 02/06/91 06012 3034 50.00 02/06/91 OD -170' ' 001-400-4204=4303 00438- $1, 930. 49T"-' --'"" ` -' '" 061�ia 33035 01/31/91 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES $0.00 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL#####*****##**##*#tt***af#####k•-4###t( tt##•ir##at#;F#ar•rF##atatar#ataratatas•star•##atatar•ataeat•* $1, 930. 49 2 3 ra 1, IR 17 10 19 2(1 21 22 24 25 20 SPARKLETTS"DRINKTNG-WATER CORP ...'-00I43`-'---"001-400-4601=4303 .00923 $38.35 183207 .00033 36036 WATER COOLER RENT/DEC 90 83207 12/31/90 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 02/06/91 *#* VENDOR TOTAL'##•Nat##at####it•Ft•asst#it#at#at#•!t##tF•LtaF#ir#7x411-444W tltr#•it#at##ai#atatititiF=riir•n#�i•}t#•#tiit#ar $38.35 — R TECHNOLD0Y bULUTION, INC. 0:3421 U01-400-2101-4'2-03-00729- $4110. 00 26 dd0�,9 T 36037 COMPUTER SERV/DEC-JAN 0926 01/31/91 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/06/91 *## VENDOR TOTAL*#atatatatat#•>faratat*•>s•ar•»atatatat*atatetat•n•atarat#•rtitatat*tt•rtatatar#ar3t•rtatatatatar#.n.uat••n.•n.•p••p•##*•p•atat*arataa# $400.00- • 433 4, 47 40 49 30 51 n4 en SR T7 Rte' -"MAR C*TEORA 03828 001-210-0000=2110 04078 $56.00 X0503 015-51 36038. DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 10505 01/29/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 02/06/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL********#**at#•u1t#atatar*at##ar###3t*#tc#hafts-it#•uar#aNiii#aratatftatat*aFatat*#tttafa,at•itata>ar*** • $50. 00. 8103. d0___...____ _...__..__TR362 00362 36039` PER DIEM ADVANCE TR362 02/04/91 210004 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 02/06/91 DOR TQTAL#*#*##**a41F##'1F1f•#*##1t####irii•1Fat#-d•#*fF4#ii•###•n•#441t#***#at*af#at*******•utr*#*#tr# R TODD PIPE -1g -SUPPLY 00124 001=400- 101=4309 06086 $91.27. 00168 36040 MISC CHCS/DEC 90 -JAN 91 01/31/91 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 02/06/91 464 .60 n.3 V I31 4: 4„ 411 30 al 32 M13 96 a2 •a i1 414 Alio FINANCE-SFA340 --TIME-10:25. 16 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION' 'TODD PIPE "& SUPPLY- MISC CHCS/DEC 90 -JAN 91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12791-- VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT -DATE INVt; PROJ 0 -ACCOUNT -DESCRIPTION 01/31/91 INV/REF PAGE 0024 DATE -02/0// PO # CHK 00r=400-61014309---01005----- = " - $173. 37---' - - - -- - " ----00-1-68'� - 35040! PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 02/06/91 -'-*** VENDOR TOTAL #'F##**####************3F###' F#*'###******t'af##******##*##'#IF#*-###y#*****_'.. _ $26-47647 "' TOMARCO' NAIL GUN REPAIR NAIL GUN REPAIR 87181 87181 -00775- 001-44100"'31034307-01096 ' 01/09/91 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $60.32 02/06/91 ._._0.0775-"----"-'105=400-2601-4309- 00690 01/09/91 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ***`-'VENDOR -TOTAL' "*•*** F***###*********** 'IFS#'# -###'#'# #'#-##'#*****Ii####'*:********** '$123: 26 "R `CITY OF*TORRANCE " PRISONER ID CHGS/DEC 90 02539 -R CITY`OF*TORR-ANCE7 3RD QUARTER MAX SHARE 02608 "w VENDOR TOTAL J3 5 36 7 e :w ..".00841._..' --OOI=400-2101=4251 _-_00350 ' $49. 50 12/31/90 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 187191 • 0144T-- ---3--60-41 $60.31 02/06/91 102539 00068- :36042-- $0.00 00 02/06/91 -00841 145=400-3402-4201----00158' ' " $8,758:00' ' - --302608- 10892 36042- 01/21/91 COMMUTER BUS /CONTRACT SERVICES $0.00 02/06/91 *#;f********##****#****##**1F*#TF######*#*4##4##+t'it4#4ir#4#tFit4itfftt#it** $8,-807750 R TRAFFIC -CONTROL SPVR-ASSN DUES/OLSON/DAVIS U1J6c 02/04/91 UU1-4U0=3104-431-5--00020 $40.00 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MEMBERSHIP —***'VENDOR TOTAL-*********************#****4***4'#*4####'ii##**4***4***lt###'#ii#**tt-*u** . ' - $40.-00. 40 45 46 4A . GD — 0 01 el R UNION METAL -CORPORATION 0D4U5 STREET LIGHT POLES 11038 01/07/91 TO5=400-2601-5499-- 00003-' '- - $3,576.13----- ' 3,576.'13.-..- ' STREET LIGHTING /NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS IF** VENDOR TOTAL#*###***'**'*#****##**#*###*###**####*"-zl *#**#***#*********##*#- # $3, 576713 R VAN LINGER BOD -SHOP • & -TOWING--"--"-'03848- 'x`001400-2101-4311 EMERG MOTORCYCLE TOWING 71671 01/15/91 POLICE 01053 $59.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE -*** VENDOR TOTAL#****######**#'####****414#414-##444431'# #&'44-N* t###4* ori#*##*##**###11.:x* $591:00 R'- VISION PARTNERS"' WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 09254 11038 16463 736043 $0.00 02/06/91 3: i. 46 AI ;.1 4'! 01.65a• --7-3-6047c--- A $0. 00 02/06/91 6O 71671 01714- - - '36040- $0.00 6045-$0.00 02/06/91 51 52 53 54 sr on 5!. 61 6: f•3 _ o-1 ""03828 "001-210_0000=2110 -04084' $575:00-. 09254 -01555-- 3604a $0.-00 02/06/91. 66 07 611 70 71 7' 02/04/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE A y• :Y:r•t t..rh.s{ -4�,r ti°. ".f;.1•J,.7.A.,:l %-• ... 74 75 70 • i1 12 13 J 1t 10 10 7 10 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME"10:-25i 16 - PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12/T—"-•-----. VND it ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC - PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTICJN PAGE • 0025 INV/REF PO_# CHK 00 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP -#1M-VENDOR TOTAL'#### 4�F####'########-##-#iI# -4 #####3F # ##*####### #*W# ##4## ### . t575700 THE#WALL STREET-J0URNAL -`-"'--00465...---00-1=400-1202-4316 00347 $139.00 -082385001236 01131 36047 PUBLICATIONS/FINANCE 01236 02/04/91. FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 30.00 02/06/91 --.•-F#*-VENDOR TOTAL- *###########at'#####*#######i1'###;f######aF*######star tr#ar #4*###### - . - - . � i 39:-if0-------- WESTERN GRAPHICS -. -- MAINTENANCE/LAMINATOR 9739 ---028737---110=400-3302-4305'- 00768 X66. 30 --9n4-00294---7.g&546-1-- 01/15/91 -9739- -00294 --- 36046----- 01/15/91 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4F VENDOR TOTAL######414144f44F4F#'##44.###41-##IF4iF# 4IF}b 41F #'# #VIF#4####### ####nu#*###Tr#### $66.35 02/06/91 R WESTERN MOBILE TELEPHONE CO. -03774-_.•--_.--00f=400-2101-4307 00262 365.00 01725- 36049 RADIO REPAIR/POLICE 01/30/91 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE $0.00 02/06/91 IT WESTERN- N0UTCE-TELEPHONE CO. - 3774 170-400-2103--5402 00023- 43,012:/8 - MICROCOMPUTER RADIOS 01/15/91 _ SPEC INVESTGTNS/EQUIP-MORE THAN 3500. TOTAL._ 4F###-4*4######4-#tF##-x-#####-a###*#######*#####*#*##-u####*###*#########-u#*3,077_7.118B - WESTIN--HOTEC- HOTEL BALANCE/COPELAND 00987 36049 $3,026.36 02/06/91 3 10 11 17 15 u I 21 19 11 77 73 24 25 76 27 'I 03752 001-400-f202-4317 00077 $1707-64 1'R318 00318 36050 TR318 02/06/91 FINANCE ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE -***-VENDOR TOTAL -#### ##44 ### Oar#ar#########*4-tit##################-#######af########### $170.64 SALLY A. #WHITE'" 0. SEC SERV/1-15-91 $0.00 02/06/91 706140 001=400=4102=4203__.-x0294--------- _._.._$204.-00•------------ .._......... ......... ..----•_•_ 10893 36051 01/28/91 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 30.00 02/06/91 ***'VENDOR TOTAL 4###4#4#4#44i4atF44###################at############at#it################ $204: 00 —Fr' -WHITLOW-EI R-GENCYTiEDTC-AE--GRP 0345/ 001-4007-2101--4201---00724- $65.-00 325=q09191 01729 36052 PRISONER EMERG SERVICE 09191 01/11/91 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 02/06/91 45 :;,-- —_:, #-VENDOR TOTAL:##4'#4#4"4##-#####################at####################################. $65.-00 47 ah 50 6% '4 65 56 r R XEROX CORPORATION-- -00135 001=4007-1208-6900 00290 $808.98- D28066633 0000 3E7033- BUY-OUT/XEROX 1040 66835 02/01/91 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS *0.00 02/06/91 56 57 50 69 60 61 66 661 64 71. 11 76 75 5 FINANCE-SFA34O 12 • 3 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • 10 • 1 1 12 XEROX CORPORATION- - ANNUAL MAINT/XEROX 1012 44094 XEROX CORPORATION MAINT/XEROX 1025/JAN 91 44092 R- XEROX CORPORATION +14 -MAINT CHCS/JAN 91 44095 15 XEROX CORPORATION------- W7 ORPORATION--- _...._W 7 MAINT/XEROX 1025/JAN 91 44092 ,5 • • • • • • 19 20 21 2;1 44 25 25 27 26 20 30 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 02/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF -DATE-INVC PROJ # --- ACCOONT-DESCRIPTION -ANDON O0I35 -001-400-2201=4201- ""-OOi95-"" 01/01/91 FIRE GUI -001=400-2401-4201-` 00276- 01/07/91 ANIMAL CONTROL -00135-----0017=400,-46014201---00731- 01/07/91 00135-----'00I =400=4601-42OT" --00731- -- 01/07/91 COMM RESOURCES _. 0OI35 1T0-400-3302=4201-- ""00263 01/07/91 PARKING ENF ----- $150.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR $28:05---7-- /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR $85. 00 - /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR $56.95... /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR *** VENDOR TOTAL *****jFrn*****-**************' F* ***4iFwww****-*********'4' *-***41t** F $1,178798- -.... ***....PAY CODE TOTAL..**********--te*- *****#-u->f#***#*****I-** -*'****-** . *** *********#'####**** PAGE 0026 PO # CHK # 027444094-- "00026' —36053 IVAT ----027444092-__. IVAT - —027444075-- IVAT -..-0274-44095-- IVAT -027444092- IVAT $178, 932-57- '' *-TOTAL WARRANTS **#***3F** ** - ********# '****-*rm'*#*'.w*********#*#**#*'*'##y#*** .._-_.._$281; 001T04- 31 32 33 N 35 3x 37 16 34 41 42 43 • 44 45 • 47 4,1 44 30 51 $0.00 02/06/91 $0.00 02/06/91 -D0025`- 36053--._. $0.00 02/06/91 00024 33053 $0.00 02/06/91 HEREBYtERfIFSTTRATTRE15eMAF6$'ORAMIS-COVEREb T THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES TO''"fNCLUSIVE OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR. /". _ _ARg ACCURATE AND F,I'JDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT THEREOF: BY 14 IS IA 17 5 I0 70 21 72 3 24 25 2n 27 7n 24 3. 31 41 45 4r Au SI '17 • • Honorable Mayor and Member's of the City Council February 4, 1991 City Council Meeting of February 12, 1991 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of January 1991. Respectfully submitted, Gary Bruts h City Treasurer NOTED• evin Northcraft City Manager 1d INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - JANUARY 1991 DATE OF INVESTMENT DATE OF MATURITY INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 01/01/91 Investment Investment Investment BALANCE 01/31/91 $3,977,000.00 1,000,000.00 300,000.00 <250,000.00> $5,027,000.00 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 01/01/91 $ 557,982.18 Investment 269,970.08 BALANCE 01/31/91 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: Union Federal S&L Investment. CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment U.S. TREASURY BOND: Investment Investment Investment 827,952.26 500,000.00 500,000.00. $ 499,326.42 $1,001,542.12 $ 500,845.79 1/03/91 1/10/91 2/22/90 5/19/88 1/03/90 3/06/90 3/08/90 1/23/91 2/21/91 5/20/93 12/31/91 2/29/92 2/29/92 8.279% 8.18% 8.10% 9.10% 7.71% 8.50% 8.50% Investment $ 999,492.83 4/20/90 3/31/92 8.763% Investment $1,019,779.01 5/14/90 2/15/93 8.49% Investment $1,023,029.89 9/14/90 6/30/94 8.50% FHLMC: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment $ 248,733.64 3/26/87 3/1/17 8.0% INVESTMENT TOTAL $12,147,701.96 SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 11/01/90 $ 507,164.28 BALANCE 11/30/90 8.625% TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO. BALANCE 6/30/90 BALANCE 6/30/90 TRUSTEE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL $ 10,711.04 10,711.04 $ 517,875.32 $12,665,577.28 Respectfully Submitted, Gary Bruts City Treasurer 7.5% Mayor and Members of the City Council February 4, 1991 City Council Meeting February 12, 1991 PURCHASE OF ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM Recommendation: Authorize the purchase of an Electro -Vote system, to include the basic component set (power memory unit, control unit, and voting station set), one large display panel, and a name overlay panel, from Fores Manufacturing Corp., and name plates, at a cost not to exceed $3,100, appropriated from Prospective Expenditures. Background:, At its meeting of November 13, 1990, the City Council concluded its public hearing (which had been continued from October 23) on procedures to expedite Council meetings and clarify citizen input opportunities, and approved, among other items, the purchase of a voting machine (visible to the public) to allow Council votes to be recorded at one time. Fores Manufacturing Corp. is the only company located, after extensive research, that apparently sells standardized systems for installation by the customer. The other firms contacted (see attachment) indicated that their systems are custom designed and installed by them. As a result, they were unable to provide a firm quote on a system, but their estimated prices ranged from $5,000 to $12,000 -- well above the price quoted by Fores Manufacturing Corp. And a`survey of the cities (see attachment) currently using an Electro -Vote system revealed no problems. Along with the basic component set, it is necessary to select one or more display units to create a functional system. A large display panel on the south wall of the Council Chambers (east of the clock) would allow for viewing by the Council, the Clerk, the camera, and the audience (although viewing would be impaired for those seated adjacent to the south wall). The name overlay panel would allow use of the system by the Planning Commission without having to change the name plates every week. The system requires five to six weeks lead time, comes with installation instruction, and is semi -customized (wood to match existing .decor, voting -station set and all plugs color -coded, and cables cut to length). To complete the system, name plates will have to be purchased separately. Respectfully submitted, Elaine Doerflin , City Clerk Concur: evin B. Northc aft, City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director COST BREAKDOWN FOR RECOMMENDED SYSTEM Basic component set $1,983.00 (power memory unit, control unit, voting station set) Large display panel 638.00 Name overlay panel 125.00 $2,746.00 Tax Freight (approx.) 178.49 20.00 $2,944.49 Ten name plates (approx. $9 ea. + tax) 100.00 (for Council & Planning Commission) $3,044.49. SURVEY OF CITIES REFERENCED BY FORESPAR Of the ten cities referenced as currently having an Electro -Vote system, only one (Redondo Beach) is no longer in use, apparently because changes to the original system made it too complicated. Their City Clerk advised getting as simple a system as possible. The information sought in surveying these cities included whether or not the system was currently in use, when it was installed, their satisfaction (or dissatisfaction) with the system, and any problems they may have experienced. Among the nine cities still using the system, all were satisfied. The installation dates ranged from 1967 to 1990. Favorable comments included: the system was easy to use, it was inexpensive, it had been well received by everyone with no complaints, and it saved time by eliminating tedious roll call votes. There were no unfavorable comments. When asked about any problems at all with the system, one cited a short in their upgraded system which was repaired immediately by the firm (but no problems since and none at allwith their original system), one cited an electrical problem (which did not surprise them after 15 years of use), one noted the need to show new councilmembers how to use the system, and one noted the need to change light bulbs as they burn out. PLEASE NOTE: The exact location of the display board will have to be determined after the system is received, by visually checking the board in different locations along the south wall to ensure maximum visibility. OTHER FIRMS CONTACTED American Video Products (714) 525-5772 Mike Maclntire Systems done custom for the facility. Just a few companies that make them. Did not know of manufacturer that sells. Will send brochures, if any come in. No price quote. KT Electronics 424-0979 Sid Wilson Systems custom-made. Did not know of any company that manufactures them. His firm has built a dozen over the years. Some systems are very elaborate. A simple system would range from $5,000 to $8,000, and they go up from there to $70,000 or $80,000. For a flat fee, he would come over and prepare a bid package --lay it out for specs. VJ Electronics 533-5980 Gary Ford Not aware of any company that manufactures and furnishes ready -built system. A company that did manufacture a standard system could sell it at a lower cost, compared to a company that must design and build a system on a project -by -project basis. Should be easy enough to install. For them to do, he guessed would cost $5,000 to $7,500. California G&K Design, Inc. 618-0366 Ken Ball Guessed would cost up to $5,000 for basic electronics, but would have to design and build display board. Had seen brochure from company called Auditel which did voting system for United Nations, butthey are not cheap. It is not cost-effective for his firm to do a small (only five stations) voting system, also has no time right now. Design Factors 697-7576 Jeff Kelleher There are some companies who manufacture them but, to his knowledge, only sell to installing contractors. Systems are usually really expensive, unless more than 12 stations. Would. probably cost $10,000 to $12,000. Knows of company in the U.K. (Auditel) that built voting system for United Nations --does excellent high-tech work, but very expensive. Would be hard to find a company that makes a standard product, but some companies do make other signalling devices such as those for waitresses, doctors and nurses. (The information sought in contacting other firms included a price quote for the system if their firm were to. do it, the names of any firms they were aware of that sold standardized systems for installation by the customer, and any other information that might be of assistance. r � \ .iF1irespaI! CITY CLERKS OFFICE CIVIC CENTER 1315.vALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254-3885 ATTN: ELAINE DOERFLING Dear, Elaine: In response to your letter of October 24, 1990 1 am providing a list of cities currently using our Electro -Vote system. Where possible I have provided the phone number. Hopefully, you will find the information helpful. The cities are: 1. Manhattan Beach, (1975), 213-545-5621 2, Seal Beach 3. Lawnsdale, 213-973-4321 4. Carlsbad, 1976 & 1987, 619-438-5535. 5. San Clemente 6. Barstow 7. Bakersfield 8. Oceanside 9. Redondo Beach 10. Riverside As you may have noticed, a few of these refernces go back to 1975 and 1976. There have been quite a few changes since then. We have just this year started to actively market our product on a national basis and the results have been outstanding. In addition to the features noted in the brochure, many of our sales are resulting from the fact that cities are broadcasting their meeting on local television. The viewing of the vote as well as the camera being able to scan to.the display and await the results, has been a deciding factor for many cities. Fores Manufacturing Corporation 22322 Gilberto, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 Tel. (714) 858-8820 Fax (714) 858-0505 Telex 181-571 6/2'd SOSO-SSG-PIZ 5341 S380.J Sa : E ti 06, 6S 130 The cities of Oceanside and Carlsbad have purchase more than one system to be used at different facilities; however, if the same facility is used .by various departments of your government, the overlay option is a quick way to facilitate multiple uses. Thanks for your inquiry, and 1 hope to be able to help you more in the future. Regards, de,/ Bill Kershaw Sales Manager BK:kr 6/E'd SBSB-BSS-ITL EJW Salad Ski:ET 86, 62 130 Efective July 1, 1988 Ji�respar Electrovote Systems Standard Special System Prices for a Five Station System are: System with "Motion/Second" Basic component set of: Power Memory Unit Control Unit Voting Station Set $1983.00 $2483.00 One or more Display Units must be added to the above to create a functional system. Large Display Panel: 24"_x 32" with 2" square indicators $638.00 $766.00 Set of Five Individual Display Panels 24" x 4" With 2" square indicators $719.00 $863.00 Small Display Panel: 12" x 14" with 3/4" square indicators $324.00 $389.00 Clerk's Display Panel: $" x 6" table topunit used if dificult for Clerk to see some other Display Panel $395.00 $474.00 Name Panel Overlay: used to avoid individual name changing when the system is used by two voting bodies $125.00 $125.00 Fores Manufacturing Corporation 22322 Gilberto. Rancho Santa Margarita. California 92688 Tel, ;714; 558-8820 Fax(714) 858-05Q5 Telex '81.57 6/17'd s0s0-8sB-PZL 5dW Sal0d 90:21 Q6, 62 00 rcsparigAnAm-i The Fores Mfg. Corp. warrants each new pi uct manufactured by it to be free of defective material and workmanship and agrees to repair or exchange, at its option, any part or parts of any unit of its manufacture which, under normal installation, use and service discloses such defect, provided the'unit isdelivered by the purchaser to us, intact, for our examination, with all transportation charges prepaid to our factory, within two (2) years from the date of sale to the original purchaser, and provided that such examination discloses, to our satisfaction, that it is thus defective. This warranty does not apply to said products or any part thereof which has been subjected to accident, alteration, abuse, misuse, damage caused by fire, flood or act of God, unproper installation, incorrect wiring not our own, improper line voltages, nor in violation of instructions furnished by us, nor extend to units which have been repaired or altered outside our factory by other than factory personnel. This warranty does not apply to electric bulbs, internal or external finish except as examination may disclose same to be defective at time of install- ation of. the equipment, This Warranty is 'for the sole benefit of the original purchaser or the entity for whom purchased if purchased and installed by a third party. Our respon- sibility under this warranty ends if the original purchaser as above described sells the equipment; if the serial number on the name plate is altered, mutilated or removed; or if parts or devises not of our manufacture are added to the equipment. This Warranty is in liew of all other agreements, expressed or implied and we neither assume nor authorize any other person to asume for us any obligation or liability in connection with the sale of said equipment or any part thereof. Fore Mfg. Corp. reserves the right to revise, change or modify the construction of ElectroVote equipment manufactured by it, or any part or parts thereof, , without incurring any obligation to make such changes or modifications when making repairs or replacements under this Warranty, and, in replacing parts under the provisions of this Warranty, to furnish an identical part or parts • that, in:our judgment, is equivalent to the part replaced. Fores Mfg. Corp., 22322 Gilberto, Rancho Santa margarita, CA. 92688 SOLD'O: MODEL# SERIAL # DATE OF 2 ForesManutaoturing. Corporation 22322 Gilberto, Rancho Santa Margarita. California 92688 Tei. (714) 856-8820 Fax (714) 858-0505 Telex 181.571 6%8'8 S©S8-8S8-VIZ 53W 83J03 60:2T 86, 6E 130 January 29, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 12, 1991 COST/BENEFIT OF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FIESTAS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background:' A cost/benefit review ofthe fiestas is objective #7 under City Council Goal#7, Upgrade Downtown. Analysis: At the time the City Council goals were developed, the City was not recovering all costs from the Chamber for the fiestas, therefore a cost benefit analysis would compare the cost to the City for the fiesta and the benefit derived for that cost. Staff is now billing the Chamber for all costs of the fiesta, except the incidental cost of placing the item on the agenda for approval and any pre -fiesta planning with the Public Safety Director, which has been minimal according to the Chief. Since the Chamber, rather than the City is paying costs relating to the fiestas, no cost/benefit review is presented. For your information, the Chamber paid $5,509.49 for costs related to the last two fiestas. Unless directed otherwise, staff will continue to bill the Chamber for all costs; the Chamber is aware and budgeting for these expenses. Concur: City Manager - 1 - Viki Copeland Finance Director lf Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 31, 1991 Regular Meeting of February 12, 1991 ACCEPTANCE OF A DONATION OF PALM TREES FROM THE DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Accept the donation of palm trees from the Downtown Revitalization Committee, 2. Approve the planting of Mexican fan palms in the downtown center medians, and 3. Waive the excavation fees associated with the tree planting. Background: The downtown revitalization committee has met for the last several months to discuss ways to improve the downtown area (see Attachment 1). The committee is seeking City Council approval of a proposed palm tree planting design (Attachment 2, available for viewing in the City Clerk's office). Analysis: Plans were prepared by Palos Verdes Landscape and Design for the Committee and are available for viewing in the Public Works office. No City funds were expended. Staff has reviewed the plans and agrees that the trees will be an attractive addition to the downtown area. Fiscal Impact: Because this is a donation, Staff recommends the waiver of this fee to enable the City and the Downtown Revitalization Committee to better work together and support mutual goals. The contractor for the Downtown Revitalization Committee will trim the trees for the first year, however after that time period the City will incur costs to trim the trees. This action would be consistent with City Council's goals of: - Upgrade Downtown . City Council to take more active role with Chamber - Enhance Sense of Community ▪ Improve image of Hermosa Beach • Better public and private medians/landscape within limitations - Improve Quality of Life . Plant trees cost DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE Attachment 1: Letter from Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce dated January 25, 1991 Attachment 2: Design plan for planting palm trees Respectfully submitted, Concur: Barbara Conklin Administrative Aide Noted for Fiscal Impact: Ow_ Viki Coeland Finance Director pworks/DRC Not available for signature Anthony Antich Director of Public Works Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager ATTACHMENT ' 1 HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 To: From: Subject: Anthony Antich, Public Works Director City of Hermosa Beach Wesley D. Bush, Executive Director Palm Tree Plantings in Center Strip January 25, 1991 The subject project has been discussed by the Downtown Revitalization Committee for the last six months and with representatives of appropriate.. city departments. The conception the committee has at the present time involves acquiring, planting and maintaining about 40 Mexican Fan Palms in the downtown area center strips. Cost of each tree would be $700 and the committee will seek sponsors for some of these trees as well as asking the Vehicle Parking District and the City of Hermosa Beach. Cary Bichlmeier is leading the committee that is working on this proposal. A design plan and schematic has been furnished to your department. We solicit the City's cooperation for this project. As soon as approval is received, we will commence our funding efforts to dovetail into the R/UDAT program. We already have commitments for 12 trees. They will vary in height from 15 to 18 feet when planted. Wesley D. Bush ExecutuZve Direc Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council. January 31, 1991 Regular Meeting of February 12, 1991 SUBJECT: CENSUS AND LAND USE STUDY STATUS REPORT INITIATED BY STAFF PURPOSE: TO EXAMINE PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES PROVIDED BY THE U.S. CENSUS BUREAU AND PLANNING STAFF'S LAND USE STUDY Recommendation To receive and file the U.S. Census information currently indicating 9,733 residential units, and a population of 18,219. Background: The Census Bureau information has been contested by many cities and is not considered highly accurate. Recently the Census Bureau provided, the City with estimates of dwelling units for each block in the City and requested the City to verify the numbers within 10 days. The City could not make verification for each block without a completed Land Use Study, and instead submitted a sample of eight blocks, all of which indicated the census had miscalculated. For example, the old boatyard property at Valley and Second Street was noted as having .zero (0) dwellings even though, it now is known as the "Moorings" and has 64 condominium units. On January 2, 1991, the City received a response from the census bureau indicating that they had rechecked their data for the eight blocks submitted by the City and except for two minor changes, were not changing the original figures, leaving the old boatyard block with zero units. On .January 28, 1991, the City Planning staff completed its lot -by -lot land use study. On January 28, 1991, the City received a preliminary population figure of 18,219 (see attached). Analysis: Based on staff's Land Use Study, the block data received from the Census Bureau is inaccurate. Staff has carefully re-examined the study data to make certain no mistakes were made. However, the overall total number of dwelling units estimated by the Census Bureau for the entire City is within 2% of the actual number of units staff actually counted; the census estimated 9,733, and the staff counted 9,577 dwelling units. 1 h In the last 10 years, since the 1980.census, the Building Department has computed a net increase of 500 units. Therefore, based on the Land Use Study total dwelling units counted, the 1980 census significantly over-estimated total dwellings. The preliminary 1990 census estimate also would indicate an over-estimate in 1980, since the current estimate of 9,733 would be only an increase of 98 units over 1980. Attached are the preliminary data from the City's Land Use Study. In summary these data indicate a total of 9,577 dwelling units, a total potential build -out of 10,076, and a possible 110 "boot -leg" units. More statistical data will be computed and provided in the revised Land Use Element particularly in regard to Commercial and other land uses. The State Finance Department indicated it received preliminary population figures as of February 4, 1991, and had not examined the information yet; it will incorporate it into its revenue to Cities estimates as soon as possible, February or March probably. Again, staff must emphasize that all the figures are preliminary and the confirmation process is not completed for the census, or the Land Use study. William Grove Building Director Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Res ectfully uabm teed, Mithiael Schubach Planning Director p/ccsrcens FORM: D-69 PAGE 8 OF 21 CALIFORNIA Bureau of the Census 1990 Population Totals Department of Commerce This table provides 1990 census population counts for states and governmental units. Since these counts provide only totals for the states and local governmental units, they are not suitable for redistricting. As required by Public Law 94-171, the Bureau of the Census will provide redistricting counts at the block level for all states and the District of Columbia. The counts will be released on a state -by -state basis beginning in early 1991 and ending by April 1, 1991. The population counts set forth herein are subject to possible correction for undercount or overcount. The. United States Department of Commerce is considering whether to correct these counts and will publish corrected counts, if any, not later .than July 15, 1991. GOVERNMENTAL UNIT (010491) Number ofd CODE 1 1 NAME 1 1 Persons PL 06 1110 PL 06 1115 PL 06 1130 PL 06 1135 PL 06 1140 PL 06 1147 PL 06 1150 PL 06 1160 PL 06 1170 PL 06 1175 PL 06 1180 PL 06 1185 PL 06 1195 .PL 06 1200 PL 06 1217 PL 06 1220 PL 06 1225 PL 06 1230 PL 06 1235 PL 06 1245 PL 06 1250 PL 06 1251 PL 06 1252. PL 06 1260 PL 06 1265 Garden Grove city 143,050 Gilroy city ========================================= 31,487 Glendale city 180,038 Glendora city = =---=--==_=_____== 47,828 Gonzales city 4,660 Grand Terrace city 10,946 Grass Valley city =-===================_______= 9,048 - Greenfield city 7,464 Gridley city = _________=_____= 4,631 Grover City city 11,656 Guadalupe city 5,479 Gustine city ----= ____________ __= 3,931 Half Moon Bay city 8,886 Hanford city =---_ == = 30,897 Hawaiian Gardens city 13,639 Hawthorne city 71,349 Hayward city - -= ----------=--=_===_=_________= 111,498 Healdsburg city 9,469 Hemet city = = __= 36,094 16,829. Hercules city Hermosa Beach 'city 18 X219 Hesperia city = =--= 50,418 Hidden Hills city 1,729 Highland city = = =____= 34,439 Hillsborough town 10,667 PL 06 1270 Hollister city 19,212 PL 06 1280 Holtville city ==__= = 4,820 PL 06 1295 Hughson city 3,259 PL 06 1300 Huntington Beach city =-========= 181,519 PL 06 1305 Huntington Park city 56,065 MTV OF WEl 1 gii 3 BlEACEI3 00111MQ2111 LIEVIEETOIn BOOK # TOTAL * UNITS TOTAL BUILD OUT BUILDING INCREASE " OF BOOTLEGS VACANT PROPERTY GOOD CONDITION AVERAGE CONDITION POOR CONDITION 4160 223 258 35 1 0 219 4 0 4161 164 165 1 - 0 2500 150 12 2 4186 808 874 66 0 15870 788 20 0 4185 526 571 45 2 36806 507 10 9 4184 1069 1142 73 0, 102143 1054 12 3 4169 264 266 2 0 3000 256 6 2 4181 1072 1082 10 1 8500 774 295 3 4182 920 940 20 0 21240 696 222 2 4183 1117 1187 70 11 91036 864 250 3 4187 1663 1751 88 85 32150 1292 349 22 4168 1751 1840 89 10 34425 1317 426 8 CITY TOTAL 9577 10076 499 110 347670 7917 1606 54 7.98 ac 82.6 16.7 0.56 HOUSING STUDYSUMMARY: TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS = 9577 BUILD OUT = 499 ADDITIONAL UNITS BOOTLEG APARTMENTS = 110 POSSIBLE VACANT LAND = 347670 SQ. FT. OR 7.98 ACRES 1980 CENSUS = 9633 DWELLING UNITS 1990 PRECENSUS = 9731 DWELLING UNITS HOUSING CONDITION: 7917 OR 82.6 IN 000D CONDITION = WELL MAINTAINED 1606 OR 16.7% IN AVERAGE CONDITION = NEEDED PAINT OR UPKEEP 54 OR .56% IN POOR CONDITION = STRUCTURAL REPAIRS OR WINDOWS BROKEN C0TV LEI ©INCICI [MEE EE glaRILEGI UP I ]tI F: 4 Maas BOOK .. .. s�A- - 1 5 9 PA - S 788 _ BOOK TOTALS R-1 R-2 R -2B R-3 R -P RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL R -1A C-1 C-2 LSC -3 M-1 4160 223 223 4161 • 144 20 164 4186 482 24. 195 17 77 13 808 4185 383 8 110 5 20 - 526 4184 400 52 561 16 7 0 33 1069 4169 211 .53 . 264 4181 290 522 260 1072 4182 572 197 96 41 14 920 4183 95 287 243 385 62 - 45 1117 4187 - 338 1216 31 8 46 24 1663 4188 65 389 1118 41 97 5 26 10 1751 TOTALS 2865 1837 697 3557 149 126 87 41 40 91 77 10 9577 { x Honorable Mayor and Members of the, Hermosa Beach City Council February 5, 1991 Regular Meeting of February 12, 1991 EL OESTE PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council direct Staff to work with residents to develop a parking permit program for El Oeste. Background: In December the residents of El Oeste have petitioned the City to have a parking permit program on El Oeste. It is recommended that Staff work with the residents to establish this program. Analysis: With the removal of curb parking on Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) there is a concern by the residents of El Oeste that their street will be used by the vacated PCH curb parkers. A program of permit parking would reduce the potential intrusion by limiting the curb parking on El Oeste to only one hour without a permit. The residential parking permit program was established in conjunction with the Coastal Commission as a year-round program for an "impacted area" between the north and south City borders extending from the beach on the west to Loma and Morningside Drives on the east. Within this area annual parking permits can be purchased for $25 each, per registered vehicle. A transferable "guest" permit of one per household per year is also available. The annual permits are valid from March 1 through the last day of February. An example of residential permit parking is the section of Palm and Montery between the north and south City limits. During the summer months (May 15 to September 15) one hour parking is in effect unless a permit is displayed. Daily permits are available for the casual users. Alternative: Another alternative considered by Staff and available to the City Council is to wait until the actual peak parking prohibitions are installed until formulating strategies relative to the need for permit parking and whether there is an influx of additional parking on El Oeste.. Attachment: Petition regardingpermit parking on El Oeste Respectfully submitted, Not available for signature Anthony Antich Director of Public Works pworks/EOPPP Concur: Petition To The Hermosa Beach City Council December 19 i We the undersigned residents request that the City establish permit parking on El Oeste, with a one-hour limit for cars not having a permit. We ask that this change be made concurrent with the upcoming posting of PM parking prohibition signs on PCH. 033 L( c- ' We the undersigned residents DISAGREE with the above petition and ask that at this time the City NOT consider modifying the parking on El Oeste. /<5131-1716 VES j JAN 031991 a 1 k City Clerk City of Hermosa BetaR • \ t• SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Petition To The Hermosa Beach City Council December 1990 We the undersigned residents request that the City establish permit parking on El Oeste, with a one-hour limit for cars not having a permit. We ask that this change be made concurrent with the upcoming posting of PM parking prohibition signs on PCH. _2 72.0 gPo --2-t- DA.. � . �'Y pk:_ r c;2' 3 I DeSfp r -.e, -1/e-D7 0,2,4 0/.Q_4. (c? .7/ 0 ((j Dr • We the undersigned residents DISAGREE with the above petition and ask that at this time the City NOT consider modifying the parking on El Oeste. 0 /7 a 7 ppsg ssowiaH i? 413 r��i Kii17 JU1a 11 1661 YO\ ��'. cry 9 "February 5, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of February 12, 1991 PEACE RUN '91 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission, the Chamber of Commerce and staff that Council approve the request from the International Peace Run to pass through the Fiesta de las Artes on Saturday, May 25 at 10:00 a.m. and that the special event permit fees for a pass-through event be waived. BACKGROUND The Mayor received a request from the Peace Run organizers to use Hermosa Beach as a torch -passing point for the Los Angeles area along their international run. Peace Run '91 is to be the longest ever relay -run which would traverse 31,000 miles around the world, passing through 60 countries along the way. The hope of the Run is to promote world peace and to provide a forum for bringing the message of hope to many locations and countries. ANALYSIS The event would involve a brief stop at the Fiesta stage at approximately 10:00 am where a ceremony and the passing of the torch would take place. Organizers project attendance of about 100-200 people which would pose little additional impact on the operation of the Fiesta and could blend easily with the existing staging and activities. The Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors approved their participation in the ceremony and would welcome the event as part of the Fiesta happenings. This run enters into its third year of existence (former runs have been held in 1987 and 1989). The 1989 ceremony took place in front of the Otani Hotel located at 120 S. Los Angeles Street in Los Angeles. The reported attendance was between 25-50 and no negative incidents occurred. If it is Council sentiment to participate in this effort, event organizers would like torequest the Mayor's attendance and words on behalf of the City and world peace. Other alternatives available to Council include: 1. Deny the request 2. Approve the request but do not approve fee waiver 3. Request more information 1j ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Request 2. Special Event Permit Rules and Regulations Respectfully Submitted, Concur: • i Kevin B. North9'raft City Manager Mary . i ooney, Director Dep'. of Community Resources November 27, 1990 Mayor Chuck Sheldon 1315 Valley Drive Herxosa Beach, CA 90254 DEC • ,J. 1990 Dear Mayor Sheldon: On behalf of PEACE RUN '91, history's longest ever relay -run, I would like to invite you and your city to be a part of an historic event. As in tile two previous Peace Runs held in 1987 and 1989, Peace Run'91 will be a 31,000 mile, 50,000 people relay -run that is passing through 60 countries on its worldwide journey. The Run will be coming through Hermosa Beach on Saturday, May 25 at 10:00 a.m. We have chosen Hermosa Beach as the main city for the Los Angeles area. This means we would like to have our major ceremony in Hermosa Beach rather than in Los Angeles proper as in previous years. Depending on your feelings, we would like to suggest as a ceremony site one of the following areas: 1) The beach/sand area immediately adjacent to the Pier, either north or south of it. 2) The sidewalk next to the abondoned "bathhouse" and part of the street in front of the restaurant "Good Stuff". 3) The Biltmore site - if construction of either a city park or hotel has not been started by then. To give you an idea, a typical host city ceremony would last about one hour (from 10:00 - 11:00 a.m.) and could look like this: * Decorated stage is set with microphones, live music, clowns, balloons, etc. - ready to welcome the runners as they come along the Strand from Redondo Beach with the peace torch. * You as mayor would receive the torch from the runner and share a few heart -felt words of inspiration and/or offer a prayer for peace (for a collection of same to be printed after the Run is completed). * You could also read a proclamation, announcing May 25, 1991 as Peace Day in Hermosa Beach. * Local school kids, groups, etc. are invited to speak on their vision for world peace, to read poems, etc. * Merchants are invited to offer their merchandise in a number of "peace raffles", etc. etc. * At the end of the ceremony, you or another local celebrity would pass the torch to a Runner as it leaves the ceremony site on its way up North. 1921 S. Sherbourne Drive. Los Am:cies, CA 90034 213/838-4746 At that point those present are invited to join the Peace Runners as they continue up the coast. The Peace Run is not associated with any specific political cause, it is not a fund raising event and there is no fee charged •for participation. The message of the Run is that world peace is possible and that peace begins with each and every individual first before it can spread to the community, the nation, the world. Participation in this unique event would allow you to share your personal commitment for peace with your fellow citizens in a far reaching and beneficial way. I have enclosed information that will help you get a feel for the uniqueness and magnitude of this event. I will contact your office within 10 days to see if you and your city would like to be a part of this important world-wide event. I am very much hoping that we will get a chance to meet as I'd like to show you via video as well as from newspaper clippings what this Run is really all about. Sincerely, Bigalita Egger Southern Region Coordinator enclosure City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 318-0280 or 379-3312 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT RULES AND REGULATIONS Permits shall be required for any group or organization requesting use of a public outdoor area or facility within the City of Hermosa Beach. A. General Information: 1. All groups or organizations shall address requests to the Department of Community Resources, 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254, 318-0280. 2. The Special Event Policy and all pertinent rules and regulations will accompany the permit. These rules and regulations must be strictly adhered to and all pertinent City Ordinances shall be enforced. 3. The Department of Community Resources will review the permit and either approve or deny the request. The decision can be appealed to the Parks,. Recreation and Community Resources Commission (see Special Event Ordinance). Some requests may be sent to City Council for their review and/or final approval. 4. A SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION must be filled out at least 15 working days prior to date of use for small events. Larger events will require more time to process. B. Classification of Use: 1. Commercial Groups: Any individual or group that is not registered non-profit organization or any event/activity sponsored by commercial entities/advertisers. Event must be open to the general public. 2. Non-profit Groups: A) Any group or organization registered with the Federal Government as a non-profit corporation and that has a non-profit corporation number. B) Any group or organization recognized by the City of Hermosa Beach as a local service organization. Event must be open to the general public. In order to qualify for non-profit status: 1) 100% of all proceeds collected on behalf of the event (after operational and permit expenses are met) must go to the non-profit organization. This includes all entry, TV and sponsorship proceeds. 2) A registered non-profit organization must be the permit applicant. 3. Private Groups/Parties: Special event permits will not be granted to private groups. Valley Park, Greenwood and Bicentennial Park are available for reservation by Hermosa Beaoh residents at no charge. Blook parties require police permit and are subject to a permit fee. Beach volleyball courts are available on a first come' first serve basis for all individuals. The Pier Avenue Courts are reserved by the City for special events. 4. Pass thru Event: A pass thru event is exactly what the Herne Imp ,t@*? gvent0 thRt, jval PN@§ thr ugh theCitQf' . HerMose deadh. The event does not term nate or begin in the City. The participants merely pass through on their way to their destination. C. Fees and Charges 1. Commercial Groups: Amount shall be negotiated between the City and applicant with a minimum amount set at $1,500 per day. 2. Non-profit Groups: Fee shall be $1 per participant and spectator up to 1,500 people. The organization shall be subject to contract negotiations with the City and will be in the same category as Commercial Groups with participants and spectators numbering more than 1,500. 3. Non-profit Groups: Pass Thrus Permit processing fee: $100 4. *Block Parties: Hermosa Beach Residents Only Permit processing fee: $25 Amplification permit fee: $30 *This permit is to be obtained through the Hermosa Beach Police Department. 5. Park Reservations: Hermosa. Beach Residents Only No Charge for permit processing. 6. Park Reservations: Fundraising Permit processing fee: $25 7. Filming: Permit processing fee $300 Location fee (public property only) $700 per day Business License fee Meter buy out 8. Still Photography,: Permit processing fee Location fee . $200 per fiscal year $10 per meter $50 $50 per day In addition to fees listed here, all costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event shall be assumed by the applicant. Those costs shall be determined upon finalization of the permit. City Council Approved 11/14/89 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 10, 1991 City Council Meeting of February 12, 1991 REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT - ACTING DEPUTY CITY CLERK RECOMMEND ACTION: It is recommended that the City Council extend for thirty (30) days the six-month temporary appointment of acting Deputy City Clerk Naoma Valdes. BACKGROUND: The incumbent Deputy City Clerk is currently absent from City Service on a medical leave. On January 9, 1991, City Council took action to extend this tem- porary appointment for thirty (30) days. Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach City Code precludes a temporary appointment of an individual to a permanent Civil Service Posi- tion for more than six months without, on a 30 days at a time basis, approval from the City Council. ANALYSIS: Since it has not been determined whether or not the incumbent Deputy City Clerk will be able to return from medical leave to resume her position, no recruitment has been initiated to es- tablish a new eligibility list. Therefore, it is requested that 'Elie City Council extend this part-time temporary appointment. Respectfully subm Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director rab/extend Kevin B. North raft City Manager lk January 22, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council City Council Meeting of February 12, 1991 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE DISPOSITION OF FORFEITED PROPERTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 11473.3 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the sale of the vehicles through Nationwide Commercial Auction Company; 2. Authorize staff to trade 2 forfeited cameras valued at $225. for 1 new camera and lenses valued at $275. to be usedby the narcotics investigators; and Authorize staff to give a forfeited mobile telephone to the Group 3 unit of the US Drug Enforcement Agency. BACKGROUND: At the regular City Council meeting of May 10, 1988, Council approved the procedures for handling assets which are seized and forfeited by the Police Department during narcotics investigations. These procedures call for the disposition of forfeited property to be approved by City Council. ANALYSIS: ecently.two vehicles were successfully forfeited to the City. They are a 1984 Lincoln Continental VIN# 1LNBP6F7EY677328 and ia. 1985 Mazda 626 VIN# JMIGC3115F1707631. These vehicles have very high mileage and numerous mechanical problems. In short, they are not in good enough condition to be utilized by the unit and we recommend that they be sold to the highest bidder at auction. Because the sale of forfeited property generates public scrutiny, the District Attorney's Office requires that all sales must be at arms length. They suggest that an independent auction company be used to sale all forfeited vehicles. Nationwide Commercial Auction Systems is one of the larger companies handling forfeited property and we have used them to conduct our regular City auctions. There were also some recent forfeitures which included one(1) Cannon 35mm camera #27501; one(1) Yashica 35mm camera #702679; and a Mitsubishi cellular telephone#90007584. The narcotics unit was in need of a good camera for the various investigations, because they had no camera, the investigators have had to use their personal cameras on several occassions in order to take the necessary pictures for evidence purposes. In an effort to conserve funds, the two old cameras, neither of which was suitable for use by the narcotics unit, were taken to Rainbow Carmera shop to ascertain trade-in value and to see if they would be amenable to a trade for the camera that could be used by the narcotics unit. The camera and lens for the narcotics unit totaled $275, the two old cameras were valued at $225. Rainbow Camera has always been a supporter of the Police Department and has agreed to an even exchange of the old cameras for the new camera. Although we have not obtained other comparable bids at the writing Of this item to be sure that we are receiving the most beneficial trade, we will do so in order to get the most for our trade. The narcotics unit is currently working on several cases in cooperation and conjunction with Group 3 of the DEA. They have been of great assistance to us with personnel and funds for narcotics operations. Their unit is in need of a cellular telephone and we wish to transfer the forfeited cellular telephone to them. This phone is not needed by our narcotics investigators, transfer to the DEA is allowable under the state guidelines and will assist in furtherance of our working relationship with the DEA. Concur: Kevin g. Northcraft Coity Manager Res tfull submitted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 12, 1991 January 16, 1991 Regular Meeting of Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: la Receive and file this report. Background: Oji October 30, 1990 the City Council requested a report from staff regarding the beach volleyball courts. On January. 15, 1991, a field inspection was made by staff to determine the location and number of volleyball courts. This report provides answers to the following Council questions. Analysis: The analysis is divided as follows: 1. Location number and permitted Volleyball courts 2. Permit Procedure 3. Who is Responsible for Maintenance of the Courts BEACH VOLLEYBALL COURTS. 1. Location Number and Permitted Volleyball Courts Limits From Number of Courts Approved Courts Permitted Existing by Council in by staff since Courts "83" "83" Lyndon 1st St. 3 3 1st St. 2nd St. 4 4 3rd St. 4th St. 3 1 5th St. 6th St. 2 1 6th St. 7th St. 4 3 8th St. 9th St. . 4 1 Pier Ave. 13th St. 9 9 15th St. 16th St. 0 1 16th St. 17th St. 4 3 17th St. 18th St. 2 1 19th St. 20th St. 2 2 21st St. 22nd St. 4 4 22nd St. 23rd St. 1 1 23rd St. 24th St. 2 1 25th St 26th St. 1 0 26th St. 27th St. 1 5 27th St. 28th St. 1 2 Limits From Number of Courts Approved Courts Permitted Existing . by Council in by staff since Courts "83" "83" 28th St. 30th St. Longfellow 34th St. Total * 29th 31st 33rd 35th St. St.: Pl. St. 1 2 2. 1 0 0 1 0 53* 43 Since 1983, seven (7) volleyball courts have been installed• without permission from the City Council or Public.Works staff. Per the adopted beach volleyball court policy, staff will post notices on these courts, requesting that the interested residents file for a permit. If permits are not approved for the additional courts, the courts will be removed. 2. Permit Procedure 1. The Volleyball permit must be picked up from the Public Works Department. (Permit copy attached) 2Permit must be returned to staff complete with applicants information, exact location of court(s), names, addresses and phone numbers of at least four adjacent property owners and signature of applicant. 3. Staff will then inspectproposed site location for approval or denial of request. 3. Who is Responsible for Maintenance of the Courts? At this time the City is responsible for maintenance of all beach volleyball courts except three courts recently permitted and located at 4th Street, 820 The Strand and 2530 The Strand. Resp'tfully submitted: Concur: Vernon Hi Public Works Superintendent Attachments: ty/vballit Not available for signature Anthony Antich Director of Public Works Mary Rooney Director of Community Resources Devin B. Northcraft City Manager Beach Volleyball Court Staff Report Dated 11-22-1983 Map of Approved Volleyball Court Locations as of 12-1-83 Map of Volleyball Court Location as of 1-16-91 November 15, 1983 Honotable Mayor and Members of the City Council Recommendation • City Council Meeting of November 22, 1983 BEACH 'VOLLEYBALL COURTS It is recommended by following: 1. Retain all 42 Beach volleyball courts as is. 2. Direct staff to develop a Beach Volleyball Court Permit Policy to be ready for implementation January 1, 1984. (Draft of Policy is Attachment A.) Background The complaint from the appellant before the Community Resources Commission was to move the one volleyball court located in front of her residence (1632 Strand) 50 feet in from the Strand wall. The appellant's request was based on the rules and regulations (devised around 1972 by the former recreation department) which stated all beach volleyball courts were to be installed at least 50 feet from the Strand wall. staff that Your Honorable Body approve the Analysis Due to not knowing of it's existence, the new Department of Com- munity Resources since it's inception, July 1, 1981, has not en - forded the present Permit Policy which the former Recreation De- partment instituted in 1972. Upon checking old files of the former Recreation Department, staff did find the form for Application for Permission to Install Beach Volleyball Courts. However, no other records were found to indicate this permit process was carried out since 1972. It appears the main area of contention is the volleyball court in question is not 50 feet from the Strand wall as required by the Permit Application Rules. Those rules were established in 1972. And according to the information staff has received, the court in question was installed at least 25 years ago. Out of the 42 courts located on the beach, 26 abutt the Strand wall. Of those 26, 15 conform to the 50 feet requirement. The actual court in question is 29'5" from the wall. There are no official records to determine when any of the Beach Volleyball Courts were installed. - Continued - Staff has also contacted the Coastal%Commission to try and find out what process or permits the City wou•.have to go through if anything should be done to the Beach Volleyball Courts. The representative from the Coastal Commission indicated he was reluctant to make any definitive statements on this issue until the City presented to them a specific plan of action. The Department of Beaches and Harbors was contacted to find out the dis_ance needed by the. tractors in order to, clean the beach., That requirement is 23 feet. At -he Community. Resources Commission meeting of September 28, 1983, the following action was taken: "To leave old courts as they are and that new courts be okayed by the Department of Community Resources and the Department of Public Works and that staff recommendations be kept in mind. The staff recommendations referred to were: 1. All courts presently located on the beach be "grandfathered" in as to location. 2. Any new courts installed after October 1, 1983, be required to go through the permit process.. 3. Beach volleyball courts will be checked once a month by City staff to determine if any new courts are installed. If new courts have been installed without a permit, the courts will be noticed and the people asked to contact the City for a permit. -If the notice is not responded to, the City will remove the courts. Beach volleyball courts will be checked periodically by City staff for liability purposes only. If there is a liability to the City, the courts will be noticed and. proper steps will be taken to correct the problem. A copy of the discussion that took place at the Commission meeting is a part of the minutes of that meeting and are attached (Attachment B). Con ur: Gregory T. Meyer City Manager ThP arr, 1 , r r r ,,nr.rip.rvu �....+. .+ Respectfully Submitted, A ana M. Mastrian, Director Dept. of Community Resources DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Phone: 376-6984 CITY OF. HERMOSA BEACH BEACH VOLLEYBALL COURTS PLEASE READ CAREFULLY - RULES AND REGULATIONS This permit is issued with the understanding that the applicant will be responsible for compliance with the policies, rules and regulations governing .use .of Park and Recreation facilities as determined by the Department of Public Works. 1. Applicant agrees to maintain the court at his own cost for use by the general. public. 2. No intoxicants shall be used, nor shall proface language, quarreling, fighting or gambling be permitted. . Failure to comply with rule #2 will result in the City removing said court from beach. 4. All permits must be secured from the office of the Public Works Department. .5. Written request, must be made to, and approval received from the Director .of Public Works._ 6. 'Post construction and court layout shall conform to the attached plan. Applicants shall furnish and install all necessary equipment. The installed court or courts become public use facilities, open to play by anyone, and may not be restricted to private play if public use is requested. 8. Any local organized Tournaments must receive a permit from the Department of Community Resources before the event takes place. 9. Courts will be checked by City staff periodically for liability purposes. * Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 •376-6984, ext. 280 VOLLEYBALL COURT SPECIFICATION SHEET ALTERNATE LOCATION OR ADDITI0NAL COURT • 60' post • 3.3' post • . BEACH AREA • 50' - Minimum distance.' from Strand wall Page 2 STRAND '1ALK AND WALL i 8 Screw eyes . only Sand • Set .posts 4' deep in sand (No concrete fdoting permitted) NO1E.: . 1. Post material is restricted to 4" X 4" wood :posts only.. 2. The. only fastenings permitted on Hosts will be screw eyes (2 per post). No hooks, nails or other protrusions wi 11. be allowed. 3. No boards or post extensions shall be added or permitted. , No guy.wires or other diagonal •supports shall be used. 5. No names either carved in post material or on a`sign shall be. attached to posts.. 6 With exception of the courts already on the Beach, there shall be no more than two volleyball courts per Strand block. 7.. There shall bea minimum of 15 feet between courts. 8. The City will not be liable for nets or. other equipment. .ism • S T • • /6 • sr.. 1?)11,. St /S sr . . .to -f't.. S T.. 21 ST. 1/3 , g . Coc •i ec4t,rit.. ` /pP-to?r la Dec : /1(9g3 f • • • ? e (o64.4 • • • 1 'Cou.c.L • 3. Cook C.o u„v.* . - e o ccvto Coco • . ';1111'D • • 5TH ). i/VW .. • I Cc • I e owf Z Co • s Cows cr.," 0 h . r • • • S • co .4•S .141i '!s • ii '1 S •?;T is •1s •vair . • •J S •1St : • 08 1. ..l •14. ..1!.111,! •.I• III A ; ALOW �a r. Permission DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 376-6984 APPLICATION P'OR PERMISSION TO INSTALL BEACH VOLLEYBALL COURTS is hereby applied, for by. (Name) Please • Addres s • City Print WR—Phone .• Home Phone to install volleyball court(s) at Number Specific Location I understand that the -location of any new volleyball Court(s) must re- ceive the approval of -the Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources and. the iiermosa Beach Public Works Department. 1. Names, addresses and phone numbers of adjacent property owners requesting new court(s). (At least four Strand property owners). 5 f �r a. I b. c. d. Name, please print address Work phone . Home phone signature Name, please print address Work phone, • Horne phone signature. Name, please print address • • Work phone Home phone signature Name, please print • address Work phone Home pl 2. • The minimum distance from 50 feet between the north the city's beach. lone . signature the/Strand wall must be and south boundries of The applicant hereby guarantees to .save and hold harmless the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, from any and all liability arising from the use of the facilities hereby applied for. Signature of person requesting permit address phone Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated January 10, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Proposed Action: To deny the staff recommendation and instruct staff to look into the provisions provided to declare the position vacant. Motion Midstokke. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To approve the staff recommendation and to di- rect staff to have a full explanation of the situation of that position, in regard to the other Deputy City Clerk, available for the next closed session. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. Recommendation to authorize disposition of forfeited property pursuant to Section 11473.3 of the Health and Safety Code. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated January 22, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) authorize the sale of two vehicles through Nationwide Commercial Auction Company; 2) authorize staff to trade 2 forfeited cameras (total value at $225) for 1 new camera and lens (total value at $275) to be used by the nar- cotics investigators; and, 3) authorize staff to give a forfeited mobile telephone to the Group 3 unit of. the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency. Recommendation to receive and file Beach Volleyball Court report. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated January 16, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To receive and file the staff report showing a total of 53 beach volleyball courts (43 approved by Council in "83", 3 permitted by staff since "83", and 7 installed without permission); the staff permit process; and, that the City is responsible for the maintenance of all but 3 permitted volleyball courts. Also, to in- clude, the City Manager and City Attorney are to inves- tigate the legality of requiring the approval of 4 (four) Strand property owners with the permit applica- tion, and to document the distance from the Strand of City Council Minutes 02-12-91 Page 7381 the grandfathered courts. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to authorize call for bids for street rehabilitation and slurry seal, CIP 89-114 and CIP 89- 170. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony An- tich dated February 4, 1991. Action: To: 1) approve the specifications for slurry sealing recommended city streets West of Valley Drive; 2) authorize staff to solicit bids for the slurry sealing project; 3) authorize staff to solicit proposals for in- spection services; 4) authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations of $337,219. Recommendation to approve notice inviting bids for City Hall furnishings. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated February 5, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. Proposed Action: To approve staff recommendation, to approve the notice inviting bids for modular furniture for the Finance and City Clerk Departments, except to provide a specification bid that would open the bidding to all manufacturers rather than limiting it to one specific brand name of furniture. Motion Creighton, second. Mayor Sheldon. Motion with- drawn by the maker. Action: To approve staff recommendation No. 1, only, by stating the square footage and amount of divisions that would provide a specification bid that would.allow all manufacturer's products to be bid, and to leave item No. 2 for a subsequent motion. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered.. Proposed Action: For No. 2, to direct staff to proceed with a specification calling for a bid for four rows fixed seating across the back of the Council Chamber and the remainder of the seating loose, a bid for the entire seating arrangement loose, and a bid for the entire seating arrangement fixed. Motion Creighton. Motion withdrawn by the maker. Action: To receive and file recommendation 2 of item 1(o). Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the objection of Mayor Sheldon. Mayor Sheldon directed City Council Minutes 02-12-91 Page 7382 February 4, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 12, 1991 AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR SLURRY SEALING CIP 89-170 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve the specifications for slurry sealing recommended city streets West of Valley Drive. Said specifications are on file in the City Clerk's office for review. 2. Authorize staff to solicit bids for the slurry sealing project. 3. Authorize staff to solicit proposals for inspection services. The Request For Proposal is on filein the city Clerk's office for review. 4. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. Background: On June 26, 1990, the City Council approved the Capital Improvement Program for the 1990-91 fiscal year. Within that program was this proposed project to slurry seal the remaining asphalt streets that were not protected in the 1988-89 fiscal year program. The amount of funds available for this project is $337,219 (See Attachment "A"). Analysis: The analysis is divided into the following areas: 1. Purpose of slurry sealing 2. Description of proposed project 3. Proposed work 4. Locations of proposed work 5. Inspection 1. Purpose of Slurry Sealing ,Slurry sealing is a streetrehabilitation method used to prolong the wearing surface of asphaltic pavements. A sand and asphaltic emulsion is applied to the street surface which seals the pavement from water penetration and improves skid resistance. 2. Description of Proposed Project ']he proposed project is to slurry seal all asphalt streets West of Valley Drive, except those streets where other improvements are scheduled by the City or utilities in the near future. This project is coordinated with the utility companies and identifies those streets where improvements such as city sewer mains, water ititains or gas lines are to be replaced or upgraded within the near future. Slurry sealing on those streets will be deferred from this contract. Streets identified in the pavement management report for rehabilitation by overlay or reconstruction have also been deleted in addition to the streets where utility improvements are to take place. The intent of this action is to not waste slurry seal funds on streets where a higher level of rehabilitation then improving the skid resistance or water proofing of the surface is required. 3. Proposed Work The project is composed of four phases: (a) If there are areas where the base has already failed as shown by existing cracking, those areas need to be dug out and replaced with both good base and surface materials. (b) Where there are open cracks through the pavement, those cracks must be sealed to stop water from penetrating downward into the sub -base materials. (c) The actual slurry sealing of the pavement is the third phase of the project and can not take place until all of the work in the first two phases is completed. (d) The last phase of the project is replacing the traffic striping. All striping will be performed in-house and is not part of the proposed contract. The project specifications have been prepared by staff and are ready to go out to bid. A copy of the specifications is on file in the City Clerk's office for review. 4. Locations of Proposed Work The streets proposed for slurry sealing are listed on the attached pages (see Attachment "B") and shown on the attached map (see Attachment "C"). 5. Inspection Staff proposes to use an outside full time inspector for this project. Full time inspection is required to insure that the Specified work procedures are followed and specified materials are used for the following work items. 1. Remove and replace A.C. 2. Crack sealing 3. Slurry sealing Daily inspection report shall record work completed by location and quantity. The Request For Proposal for inspection services is on file in the -City Clerk's office for review. Fiscal Impact: The funds for this project are from the State Gas Tax Fund and have been approved by the City Council in the amount of $337,219. Construction and inspection costs will be limited to this total and no work requiring funds above this total will be allowed. After construction bids and inspection proposals have been received, and the construction contract is awarded, the scope of the work will be adjusted to•stay within the budgeted amount. Alternatives: Alternatives considered by staff and available to the City Council are: 1. Increase the scope of the project 2. Decrease the scope of the project Respectfully submitted, Concur: 1161 11-114"4- /3eh(L Homayoun Behoodi Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Review: 'Niki Copeland Finance Director works/srccssl n Terry Deputy City Engineer Not available for signature Anthony Antich Public Works Director /1074 -uv r2 Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager CIP 89-170 SLURRY SEALING EXPENDITURES PROJECT ELEMENTS EXPENDED PRIOR TO FY89-90 BUDGET FY89-90 EXPENDED THRU 2/28/90 ESTIMATED EXPENDED 6/30/90 ESTIMATED BALANCE 6/30/90 BUDGET. FY90-91 BUDGET FY91-92 ESTIMATED FUTURE NEEDS ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 0 0 0 PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES 0 0 0 CONSTRUCTION 105,759 286,958 TOTAL FUNDING 0 286,958 286,958 $0 $337,219 $337,219 300,000 692,717 INSPECTION 14,500 28,696 , 0 28,696 28,696 30,000 73,196 OTHER DIRECT COSTS 22 200 (200) 222 SUBTOTAL 120,281 315,654 0 200 315,454 315,654 0 0 0 330,000 766,135 CONTINGENCY 21,565 21,565 21,565 ' 33,000 54,565 TOTAL EXPENDITURE $120,281 $337,219 $0 $200 $337,019 $337,219 $0 SO SO $363,000 $820,700 FUNDING SOURCES 115 .STATE GAS TAX FUND 120,281 337,219 0 0 337,219 337,219 363,000 820,500 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FUNDING $120,281 $337,219 $0 $0 $337,219 $337,219 $0 $0 $0 $363,000 $820,500 TOTAL UNFUNDED Attachment "A" CIP 89-170 Slurry Sealing, FY 90-91 (West of Valley Drive) LIST OF STREETS TO BE REPAIRED AND SLURRY SEALED STREET Limits FROM TO Length Width (ft.) (ft.) Area ESTIMATED COSTS SLURRY CRACK REMOVE & TOTAL AVERAGE REPAIR (sq.ft.) SEAL SEAL REPLACE ESTIMATED COST ($.08/sq.ft.) ($.50/lin.ft) ($5.80/sq.ft.)* COST ($/sq.ft.) 1. Lyndon St. 2. 1st St. 3. 2nd St. 2nd St. 4. 3rd Ct. 5. Culper Ct. 6. 6th Ct. 7. 7th Ct. 8. Bard St. 9. 10th Ct. 10. 10th St. 10th St. 10th St. 11. 11th St. 12. Cypress Ave. Cypress Ave. 13. 11th Pl. 14. Bard St. 15. Alley, N. of Pier 16. Pier Ave. 17. 17th Ct. 18. Circle Dr. 19. Bay View Dr. Bay View Dr. Bay View Dr. 20. Valley Park Ave. 21. Alley, W. of Hermosa 22. Alley, S. of 22nd St. 23. 22nd St. 24. Power St. Hermosa Ave. Hermosa Ave. Monterey Blvd. Palm Dr. Beach Dr. E. of Monterey Beach Dr. Beach Dr. N. of 8th St. Beach Dr. Monterey Blvd. Hermosa Ave. Strand Strand S. of Alley. Pier Ave. Bard St. Alley Loma Dr. Strand Beach Dr. Manhattan Ave. Pier Ave. 19th St. Circle Ave. 20th St. 22nd St. Beach Dr. Strand 24th St. Monterey Blvd. Monterey Blvd. Valley Dr. Monterey Blvd. Hermosa. Ave. 2nd St. Hermosa Ave. . Hermosa Ave. 8th St. Hermosa Ave. Loma Dr. Monterey Blvd. Hermosa Ave. Hermosa Ave. 11th St. S. of Alley. Valley Dr. 11th Pl. Bard St. Hermosa Ave. Hermosa Ave. Manhattan Ave. 1st St. Pier Ave.' 19th St. S. of 18th St. 21st St. Alley Hermosa Ave. 20th St. 490 540 500 440 120 290 235 255 295 320 245 480 415 435 135 540 218 240 530 460 445 715 1580 3270 525 715 260 50 -200 650 28.0 40.0 40.0 30.0 19.5 20.0 19.5 19.5 25.0 19.5 25.0 40.0 34.0 40.0 29.0 20.0 25.5 41.0 18.0 80.0 19.0 20.0 19.0 19.0 20.0 28.0 9.0 19.0 39.5 25.0 13,720 21,600 20,000 13,200 2,340 5,800 4,583 4,973 7,375 6,240 6,125 19,200 14,110 17,400 3,915 10,800 5,559 9,840 9,540 36,800 8,455 14,300 30,020 62,130 10,500 20,020 2,340 950 7,900 16,250 $1,098 $822 $93 $2,012 .15 $1,728 $638 $3,915 $6,281 .29 $1,600 $0 $882 $2,482 .12 $1,056 $0 $905 $1,961 .15 $187 $218 $0 $405 .17 $464 $389 $1,027 $1,880 .32 $367 $248 $505 $1,119 .24 $398 $341 $0 $739 .15 $590 $314 $1,404 $2,307 .31 $499 $338 $510 $1,347 .22 $490 $314 $0 $804 .13. $1,536 $1,150 $7,540 $10,226 .53 $1,129 $947 $191 $2,267 .16 $1,392 $2,148 $1,717 $5,257 .30 $313 $297 $0 $610 .16 $864 $818 $348 $2,030 .19 $445 $349 $0 $794 .14 $787 $689 $516 $1,992 .20 $763 $585 $278 $1,627 .17 $2,944 $1,513 $0 $4,457 .12 $676 $519 $348 $1,543 .18 $1,144 $774 $3,863 $5,781 .40 $2,402 $1,928 $2,245 $6,574 .22 $4,970 $3,990 $7,499 $16,460 .26 $840 $644 $0 $1,484 .14 $1,602 $1,054 $545 $3,201 .16 $187 $215 $418 $819 .35 $76 $87 $0 $163 .17 $632 $370 $0 $1,002 .13 $1,300 $457 $766 $2,522 .16 Attachment "B" STREET ESTIMATED COSTS AVERAGE Limits Length Width Area SLURRY CRACK REMOVE & TOTAL REPAIR (ft.) (ft.) (sq.ft.) SEAL SEAL REPLACE ESTIMATED COST FROM TO ($.08/sq.ft.) ($.50/lin.ft) (55.80/sq.ft.)* COST (S/sq.ft.) 25. 24th St. Park Ave. Valley Dr. 24th St. Manhattan Ave. Park Ave. 26. Ozone Ct. 25th St. 24th St. 27. Silverstrand Ave. 25th St. 24th St. 28. 25th St. Park Ave. Valley Dr. 29. Morningside Dr. 25th St. N. of 25th St. Morningside Dr. 30th Pl. Longfellow Ave. 30. 26th St. Hermosa Ave. Manhattan Ave. 31. Hermosa Ave. 27th St. 24th St. Hermosa Ave. 35th St. 27th St. 32. Manhattan Ave. Pier Ave. 1st St. Manhattan Ave. Circle Ave. . Pier Ave. Manhattan Ave. 27th St. 21st St. Manhattan Ave. 33rd Pl. 27th St. Manhattan Ave. 33rd St. 33rd Pl. Manhattan Ave. Neptune St. 33rd St. 33. 27th St. Greenwich Village Morningside Dr. Gould Ave. Morningside Dr. Valley Dr. 34. 28th Ct. Morningside Dr. E. of Morningside 28th Ct. Palm Dr. Manhattan Ave. 35. 28th St. Hermosa Ave. Valley Dr. 36. 29th Ct. Palm Dr. Manhattan Ave. 37. 30th Pl. Palm Dr. Morningside Dr. 38. 31st Pl. Palm Dr. Morningside Dr. 39. 32nd Pl. Palm Dr. Morningside Dr. 40. Longfellow Ave. Ingleside Dr. Valley Dr. Longfellow Ave. Hermosa Ave. Ingleside Dr. 41. Ingleside Dr. 33rd St. Longfellow Ave. 42. 35th St. Hermosa Ave. Manhattan Ave. Totals 1105 570 456 640 885 331 470 210 850 1900 3150 2000 1490 1500 150 200 635 580 228 148 1440 148 772 772 772 200 1120 215 265 38,795 ft. = 7.35 mi. 24.0 30.0 19.5. 30.0 24.0 25.0 25.0 30.0 84.0 48.0 50.0 40.0 40.0 30.0 50.0 25.0 31.0 40.0 11.0 14.0 30.0 14.0 14.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 40.0 14.0 15.0 26,520 17,100 8,892 19,200 21,240 8,275 11,750 6,300 71,400 91,200 157,500 80,000 59,600 45,000 7,500 5,000 19,685 23,200 2,508 2,072 43,200 2,072 10,808 6,948 6,948 3,000 44,800 3,010 3,975 $2,122 $1,368 $711 $1,536 $1,699 $662 $940 $504 $5,712 $7,296 $12,600 $6,400 $4,768 $3,600 $600 $400 $1,575 $1,856 $201 $166 $3,456 $166 $865 $556 $556 $240 $3,584 $241 $318 1,214,687 397,175 $1,550 $1,197 $507 $734 $1,027 $245 $398 $386 $2,420 $4,276 $8,295 $4,213 $3,139 $2,240 $373 $249. $496 $1,155 $89 $112 $0 $124 $616 $537 $336 $0 $0 $80 $158 $174 $1,972 $1,073 $3,161_ $1,676 $0 $0 $0 $8,474 $3,480 $16,988 $13,247 $4,831 $1,270 $0 $2,030 $911 $3,828 $0 $487 $1,491 $0 $1,705 $174 $470 $0 $2,477 $0 $0 357,106 3105,432 $3,846 .15 $4,537 .27 $2,291 .26 $5,431 . .28 $4,402 .21 $907 .11 $1,338 .11 $890 .14 $16,605 .23 $15,052 .17 $37,883 .24 $23,861 .30 $12,738 .21 $7,110 .16 $973 .13 $2,679 .54 $2,982 .15 $6,839 .29 $289 .12 $765 .37 $4,947 .11 $290 .14 $3,186 .29 $1,266 .18 $1,361 .20 $240 .08 $6,061 .14 $321 .11 $476 .12 3259,713 .21 Total (slurry seal, crack seal, remove & replace) 3259,713 Inspection 328,696 Contingency 48,810 * Unit cost per square foot of area to be removed and replaced, not the total area of the street. Total 3337,219 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 0 MENU WAVSTREE1S I PROPOSED STREETS FOR SLURRY SEALING • 1. 11111 / 5, =IV 11 116, irrfi 11- 11111.11;11.11;-"111! 1 4,, MOM TA7-1i1— II 1111 111 i Il 11 '11 February 5, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 12, 1991 NOTICE INVITING BIDS, MODULAR FURNITURE RECOMMENDATION ON COUNCIL CHAMBER CHAIRS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: (1) Approve the notice inviting bids for Harper modular furniture for the Finance and City Clerk Departments. (2) Direct staff to proceed with bid specifications for refurbished, fixed seating for the Council Chambers. Background: On June 26, 1990, the City Council approved a full-time Deputy City Treasurer and a 3/4 Senior Account Clerk in the Finance Department. The City Clerk has $400 for office furniture budgeted in 90-91 and $600 in 91-92. On August 14, 1990 the City Council approved reappropriation of $30,000 to CIP 609 for modular furniture, with $5,000 allocated for new public seating for the Council Chambers. Analysis: Modular Furniture The addition of another employee in the Finance Department necessitates conversion to modular furniture in order to create the space required. There are currently workstations for five full-time employees and a small desk for the part-time Senior Aide employee. It is virtually impossible to add another station in the already cramped workspace without switching to a more space efficient type of furniture. The City Clerk is requesting a replacement credenza since the 6urrent one is an improper height and width for the computer terminal and keyboard. Locks are necessary for confidential FPPC documents and political action committee files. The second credenza is a replacement with a more practical/functional piece of furniture. By combining the furniture requested by the City Clerk with the larger bid for the Finance Department, it is hoped lower prices will be obtained. If funds are leftover from the $25,000 in CIP 609, the furniture could be purchased now and the City Clerk budget reduced for 91-92. The Police Department was the first department to purchase Harper brand furniture during their remodeling of the Police Station. Personnel also purchased Harper furniture for the reception area 1 to to create a workstation for the word processing secretary. The plan is to consistently purchase the same type and color of furniture for all city offices so that it is interchangeable among workstations and departments in the event of relocation or rearrangement. One of the primary features of Harper furniture io flexibility; desk returns can be switched from left to right; d'esk drawers are on a track that can be switched from left to right. The furniture is manufactured in Torrance, so refurbishment is easy when necessary. The District Manager from Harper's inspected the Finance Department, took measurements and mapped out the existing furniture layout which was then forwarded to a Harper, distributor, DPS, who was recommended for space planning. Since it was determined that a formal bid would be necessary to ensure competition, DPS offered to provide the space planning free of charge withsthe understanding that such services would have no bearing on the final award of bid. The representative discussed needs with the Finance Department staff and recommended three Potential configurations of furniture. The Finance Department staff selected the plan attached as Exhibit A. There will be seven workstations in the Finance Department.Five stations consist of the desk, credenza, bridge between the two and an overhead storage unit. The station for the new 3/4 senior account clerk is a bit smaller without the credenza. The station for the senior aide consists only of a desk. All files are lateral files, which are more efficient for storage (more inches per drawer) than the existing vertical files yet require less space. Formal bids will be mailed to the ten Harper distributors in this area. Bids are expected to be around $20,000. Council Chamber Chairs Staff has researched replacement seating for the public in the Council Chambers. The Chambers currently have approximately 100 seats which are at least 20 years old. The existing budget of $5,000 would equate to $50.00 per chair for replacement of all chairs. The quality of chairs available at that price is less than the existing chairs, therefore staff would not recommend replacement with the existing type chair at that price. Fixed seating seems to be more appropriate for the setting of a Council Chamber,a better investment and is in fact shown on the original plans for the building. It is not known why fixed seating was not originally installed. New fixed seating can range, depending on the quality, anywhere from $125 to $500. Realizing that the City Council may not want to invest that much, given other needs, staff recommends that bids be solicited for reconditioned fixed seating. Refurbished seating can probably be obtained for $75-100 per chair and will substantially improve the appearance and comfort of the Council Chambers. The attached brochure shows samples of fixed seating. Reconditioned chairs, similar to the "Concordia" model on page 6 would be in the $95 price range. Reconditioned chairs would be subject to availability, since not all vendors offer them and styles would be limited to the supply on hand. The Concordia is an example of the typically available 2 reconditioned chair, similar to those found in movie theatres. The chairs would have metal or plastic backs which can be painted a variety of colors. Upholstery would also be available in a variety of colors. The Community Center Theatre chairs are an example of reconditioned chairs. The chairs were not purchased however; they already existed. The Public Works Director and the Finance Director met in the Council Chambers with a representative of the company who restored the Community Center chairs to discuss possibilities and maintenance. Since the Council Chambers is frequently used in a workshop setting, fixed seating would be recommended for the four bock rows only, which is approximately 56 seats. The seats can be installed directly on the existing tile. The chairs could obviously no longer be removed for cleaning, however the spacing will allow gnough room for adequate floor care. The existing solid color chairs can be used for the front rows and perhaps be replaced at a later date when funds are available. At the current budget level, staff believes the combination of the current seating and reconditioned fixed seating improves the appearance and comfort of the room at a moderate cost, still leaving some flexibility in the use of the the room. Alternatives: Several alternatives exist: Reserve the $5,000 with a plan to appropriate additional funds in the future in order to select a higher quality chair. - Purchase a higher quality chair and install fewer rows at this time. - Replace the existing type of seating with a similar style. This type of chair would start at approximately $100. Leave the seating as is. Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Kevin B. Nortecraft City Manager viki/bidfurn 7. EXHIBIT "A" 4 F A CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 'BID SHEET FINANCE DEPARTMENT WORKSTATIONS ARE SHOWN ON ATTACHED DRAWING WITH SYMBOL AND LETTER OF WORKSTATION WORKSTATION A, B, E AND F ITEM #S REFER TO ITEMS WITHIN EACH WORKSTATION ON THE ATTACHED DRAWINGS ITEM # QTY. DESCRIPTION BID PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL C D HARDWARE HARPERS #PF -3060 -SP DESK 30" X 60" SINGLE PEDESTAL B 1 HARPERS #PF -2042 -UD BRIDGE 20" X 42" HARPERS #PF -2460 -SP CREDENZA, SINGLE PEDESTAL 24 "X 60" 4 HARPERS #DR -3260-D DESK RISER WITH DOORS 32"H HARPERS #PC -SA -4860 PANEL 48"H X 60"W HARPERS #FCC -48-C CORNER FINISH CHANNEL 48"H STATION A,B,E,F - 1 EACH HARPERS #PWM -48 PANEL WALL MOUNT KIT 48"H STATION A,E AND F - 1 EACH 2 SETS OF 6 HARPERS #PSR -EC -6 SIDE RAIL END CAPS . (FOR USE THROUGHOUT THE OFFICE) 2 SETS OF 6 RACEWAY END CAPS (FOR USE THROUGHOUT THE OFFICE) • WORKSTATION C ITEM # QTY. DESCRIPTION BID PRICE 1 HARPERS #PF -3060 -SP DESK 30" X 60" SINGLE PEDESTAL 1 HARPERS #PF -2042 -UD BRIDGE 20" X 42" 1 HARPERS #PF -2460 -SP CREDENZA, SINGLE PEDESTAL 24" X 60" 1 HARPERS #DR -3260-D DESK RISER WITH DOORS 32"H 1 HARPERS #PC -SA -6260 PANEL 62" H X 60"W 1 HARPERS #PC -SA -6230 PANEL 62"H X 30"W T 1 HARPERS #PC -SA -6242 PANEL 62"H X 42"W tJ 1 HARPERS #PC -SA -6224 PANEL 62"H X 24"W HALDWARE 1 HARPERS #PWM -62 PANEL WALL MOUNT KIT 62"H 1 HARPERS #FCS -48 -C STRAIGHT FINISH CHANNEL 1 HARPERS #PC -S-62 COMMUNICATIONS CHANNEL STRAIGHT 8 UNIT PRICE TOTAL WORKSTATION D ITEM # QTY. DESCRIPTION BID PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL HARPERS #PF -3060 -SP DESKS 30" X 60" SINGLE PEDESTAL HARPERS #PF -2042 -B5 -R ATTACHED RETURN 27"H 1 #PBD -60 OVERHEAD STORAGE 'UNIT WORKSTATION F ITEM # QTY. DESCRIPTION BID PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL N?TE - ADDITIONAL FURNITURE FOR STATION F. L 1 HARPERS #PC -SA -4842 PANELS 48"H X 42"W Z 1 HARPERS #PC -SA -4824 PANEL 48"H X 24"W PANEL #PC -SA -4830 WORKSTATION G HARPERS #PF -2448 -SP DESK 24" X 48" SINGLE PEDESTAL FILING ITEM # QTY. DESCRIPTION HARPERS #LFF-305-BL-LD 30" LATERAL FILE, FULL PULL 5 DRAWER WITH LIFT DOOR BID PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL N 3 HARPERS #LFF-365-BL-LD 36" LATERAL FILE, FULL PULL 5 DRAWER WITH LIFT DOOR P 1 HARPERS #LF -305 -SC 30"W X 60"H LATERAL FILE STORAGE CABINET HARPERS #LF -365 -SC 36"W X 60"H LATERAL FILE STORAGE CABINET 0-1 2 LFF-304 BL FOUR DRAWER LATERAL FILE SALES TAX INSTALLATION COST (IF NO SEPARATE PRICE, SO STATE) HOURS REQUIRED DELIVERY COST AND DATE WARRANTY AND SERVICE INFORMATION TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT BID CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BID SHEET CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DESCRIPTION BID PRICE HARPERS #PF -2460 -CR CREDENZA 24" X 60" DOUBLE PEDESTAL HARPERS #PF -2466 -CR CREDENZA 24" X 66" LOCK PER PEDESTAL KNEESPACE KEY BOARD SHELVES #KKS SALES TAX INSTALLATION COST (IF NO SEPARATE PRICE, SO STATE) HOURS REQUIRED DELIVERY COST AND DATE UNIT PRICE TOTAL WARRANTY AND SERVICE INFORMATION TOTAL CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BID GRAND TOTAL 11 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH NOTICE TO INVITE BIDS The City of Hermosa Beach invites bids on the Harper's modular furniture listed on the attached bid sheets. Bids should be clearly marked "Modular Furniture Bid" on the front of the envelope and addressed to the City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach, CA, 90254 and are due no later that 2:00 p.m., March 7, 1991. At that time, bids will be opened by the City Clerk in the City Hall Council Chambers. Furniture listed on the bid sheets is for the City Clerk and Finance Departments. The City Clerk's Office is replacing existing credenzas of inappropriate height and width. The Finance Department is converting to modular furniture in order to add a Workstation for a new employee. The color of all furniture is "Light Rosewood". Unit price and total price for each item is to be shown on the bid sheets supplied by the City. The last page of the department bid sheets is to include the total of all items bid, sales tax, cost and date for delivery, cost and hours of installation required, Warranty and service information. A grand total for the entire bid should be listed on the last page. The bid sheet is to be signed and dated by an authorized representative of the bidding company. The City of Hermosa Beach reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any irregularities in a bid, and to award the sale to the supplier providing the equipment best meeting the City's needs. If there is a discrepancy in bid totals, or grand totals, unit price listed for each item shall prevail in determining total bid amount. Incomplete bids may be disqualified. ontact Viki Copeland for bid package Finance Department, Room 201 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 318-0225 Niki.notcbid 12 THE CHOICE FOR ESIGNERS BuyLine 0098 D PERM 0 Our economical ete.e1 .1.a,r-Idar tubing fuIfeaturesiLticr°3_e_ otimo_u‘avnedld-iY.,e ni aotitshtledue;;d°:f7 added strength _ protection. • 15 THE DESIGNER The Lexington Classic Distinctive, radiused corners highlight a remarkably fin- ished appearance. Hidden, back -panel fasteners con- tinue the clean rich charac- ter. Shown here with cast iron standards. D-05120 —271" (69.2 cm) --1 201/4" (51.4 cm)— " -191/2" (49.5 cm) m)I'-191/2"(49.5cm) 1 The Berwyck The extra -high tapered back, radiused side-to-side and top -to -bottom, is as.lux- uriously comfortable as it looks. Specially designed end panels accentuate the graceful curve of the back. E c, E`0 I` LI L151/4" (39.7 cm) 0-44250 i 29" (73.7 cm) • 221" (56.5 cm)- 20" (50.8 cm)—. `• U a 1 ai Ia fl �, „ . rs 81 i 1 og I 1 by cg N Ji I 171/2" (44.5 cm) T f I 4i The Stratford Classic An invitingly soft appear- ance and improved acoustic absorption result from our generous use of upholstery on back and end panels, armrests, seat pan and classic cast iron standards. 16 r D-04232 r—_ 281/4" (73.3 cm 22' (55.9 cm) — 201h" (51.1 cm) 24'h" (62.2 cm) - 17114" __ (44.2 cm) SERIES PROM HUSSEY The Chadwick Classic Our select grain, hardwood back panel reveal, arms, and end panel provide a tradi- tional element of sophistica- tion for prestigious facilities, with the durability of classic cast iron standards. D-05170 28" (71.1 cm) --1 -- 21' (53.3 cm) --i — 20'/4" (51.4 cm) i The Regency Classic Extended back height and box back upholstery enhance comfort and create an immediately perceived aura of elegance. Shown here with cast iron standards. 16W ` (41.9 cm) D-05141 -- 29W (74.3 cm) —.1 — 22W (56.8 cm) ��-��jjjjj —21%" (54.9 cm) -,i1 II E V The Essex Classic With attractive and mar resistant plastic laminate back panel and arms, the Essex combines the dura- bility of cast iron standards with high style. Shown here with optional aisle light. 17 I E r-4 U m n a nom" (45.1 cm) 27W (69.2 cm) 201/4" (51.4 cm)- -19W (49.5cm)1 D-05120 E ° E el V -��E co N (DI"cki+� n m 7, I to a I._ ; — 15W ... J (39.7 cm) THE CONTEMPO The Concordia Classic Comfortable, sturdy, and simple to maintain, this workhorse design also fea- tures the time proven dura- bility of cast iron standards. r- 27W (69.2 cm) L. 20W (51.4 cm)... 19W (49.6 cm)—i! -2,1\I; The Concordia With economical steel stan- dards and blow -mold arm- rests, this chair combines affordability with Hussey patented durability and comfort. r - 271/2" (70.0 cm) —.1 20W (52.4 cm)--, i 18W (47.3 cm)— 1 1 i I 1 ! 1 i 15W (40.3 cm) The Chestnut Hill The additional back height and plush box back uphol- stery add extra comfort and richness—affordably. A popular choice of our theatre customers. 18 30W (77.2 cm) 23½ (59.7(59.7 cm) 21W (54.9 cm) E ID OD .1_ 233/4" D-41115 18'/. (47.9 cm) '—'"" E 0 0 ID CV SERIES FROM HUSSEY The Concordia Lecture Hall Our optional laminated plas- tic tablet arm is built to take a pounding and features an over -sized surface coordi- nated with matching filler end panels for a consistent, handsome appearance. The Olympiad Lecture Hall Equipped with a retractable tablet arm for lecture hall duty, the Olympiad's high density polyethylene seat and back offer extra resi- lience for tough school environments. 12710/HUS BuyLine 0098 ,.C-57110with T/A 301" (77.5 cm) - i-- 27W (70.0 cm) — 23Ve (59.1 cm) �-- 18%" -- I (47.9 cm) The Concordia Arena Our durable cast iron Z -style standard permits easy access for cleaning -making this model an excellent choice for arenas. Shown here with optional Olympiad •plastic back, the chair is also avail- able with a standard uphol- stered back. 19 f 0 c) 0-60485 with T/A 29" (73.7 cm) 221/2" (57.2 cm)—.. — (43.8 cm) L— L117 (25.4 cm) C-26185 Floor Mount The Olympiad Indoors or out, the Hussey Olympiad is the number -one draft pick for stadiums, arenas, race tracks, and amphitheaters. 24. (61 ° cm) It is the most attractive, comfort- able and rugged spectator seat on the market. Ask for our com- plete Olympiad portfolio. 17" (43.2 cm) Hussey Seating Co. North 'Berwick, Maine 03906 USA Telephone: (207) 676-2271 -%"• FAX: 207) 676-2222 Hussy Seating Co. (Canada) Ltd. 20 Torlake Crescent, Toron Ontario, Canada M8Z 1 B3 Telephone: (416) 259-7611 FAX: (416) 259-1308 g Hussey Seating Company 1990 RW/JSM 9/90 Printed in U.S.A. Telescopic Platform & Gym Seating to Auditorium, Arena and Theatre Chairs Stadium Seating Consult your Hussey representative for complete details. 20 Hussey Seating Systems (Europe) Ltd. 37 Arkwright Road Astmoor Industrial Estate Runcorn, Cheshire, England WA7 1NU Telephone: (0928) 575751 FAX: (0928) 575767 Hussey International Sales Co. North Berwick, Maine 03906 USA Telephone: (207) 676-2271 FAX: (207) 676-2222 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 5, 1991 Regular Meeting of February 12, 1991 PURCHASING A USED CRAWLER FOR THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Recommendation: It is recommended that City Councilauthorize the purchase of a Crawler, Model #943 and Interstate Trailer from Shepard Machinery at a cost of $82,317.63. Background: The existing crawler loader that the city owns is used to keep the storm drains open and remove sand from against the Strand wall. The crawler is fifteen years old and has vast amounts of rust to frame, track, chassis and cab. These items are so badly worn that while moving sand on the beach the front bucket often hits the tracks. .,This causes damage to the machine and is a hazard to the operator. The City of Hermosa Beach has obtained quotations for the purchase of a used crawler and new trailer. Included in the FY 90-91 budget is an appropriation of $70,000 for the purchase of a used crawler. An additional appropriation for purchase of the trailer is being requested as part of the mid -year budget review included on this agenda. Analysis: A new 943 crawler will cost $125,000.00 + Tax = 133,125.00. Purchasing the used 1989, 943 crawler, will cost $78,888.25 less the $9,750 trade in allowance or $69,138.25 which is a savings of $63,986.75. The crawler has less than 600 hours of use, will be steam cleaned, repainted and carry a new machine one year warranty. A new trailer will be required since the existing trailer carries only 24,000 pounds and is too small.for the 943 crawler. The proposed Interstate trailer will carry 40,000 pounds. To purchase a used crawler the following features are required:. A. Multi Purpose Bucket B. Under 600 Engine Hours C. Enclosed Cab D. Warranty of at Least 1 Years E. Rippers F. Heater/Defroster G. Sealed Tracks H. Hydrostatic Transmission I. Back-up Alarm J. Lights Forward and Reverse The following vendors have been quotations for a used crawler. Company Contact Coast Line Equip. Long Beach, CA Contractors Equip. Corp. Dresser Const. Shepard Machinery Mike Smith Ed Fudurick (714)535-7731 Matt Bennett Dick Shanefield contacted or visited in obtaining Conclusion Recommend Didn't have any of the above listed features, and would not take trade in. Lease unit only. Has all the above listed features except it does not have the Hydrostatic Trans- mission that is needed for opening beach storm drains. This crawler isthe same size as the City's crawler which is much smaller in size than the 943 crawler. Has all of the above listed features and would take old crawler as trade-in. Would have to purchase another trailer because of weight difference. (See attached cost sheet) No No Yes Regarding the foregoing information it would be in the City's best interest to obtain the crawler and trailer from Shepard Machinery. They stock the most reliable equipment in the Southern California area. Pursuant to the City's used equipment purchase policy, the. City Senior Mechanic has inspected the recommended equipment and found it to be in excellent condition. Respectively Submitted, Concur: Vern Highfie Superintendex Noted For Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance Attachment: 943 Crawler Cost ty/memokl NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE Anthony Antich Director of Public Works FQ Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Sheet 943 Crawler: A 943 CRAWLER AND TRAILER COST SHEET Cost : $73,900.00 Tax 4,988.25 Total: $78,888.25 Less Trade In: $9,750.00 (125 Crawler & Trailer, the City Owns) new trailer cost: Total: $69,138.25 Cost: $12,375.00 Tax: 804.38 Total: $13,179.38 $82,317.63 Cost of Crawler/Trailer: Budgeted Amount For New Crawler: Midyear Recommendation for Trailer: Budgeted Amount to be Used: $70,000.00 12,000.00 $82,000.00 The additional $317.63 needed will be taken from within the existing sewer/storm drain budget. ty/ccs Il%. K6Vid /1/2(27W RAFT" /c -opt' `7 6/71 6 1.-/w/3'lo5i' Relkh' Mc0 /)? oS /1 e b ,) r /,; ( 4 '00, /L/ow L01,,er /0.V 7' piger /16(41014 ewey, G'�9 1?/ e /7 54 AleN4C It l'Yja' l 6r?? • .iGV6aW1 / JAN 1." 199 g//v6 77/ ) L /:7-7-r--/ P u81. /a //6re A'G; 6-7-a; 16'`6 /Ite.6/�i ,TMfRO ),/ T//6 C/ 7 ' CD SNC/i.- /Yl6b,T/1vi PQJe6: S ) - /'fl iN e rr "Do 6 ,c )e P/) 7 c/,274/v x'32/ fiS t9a bYi R .77-/-(3 6-6/tv-''G 4F '" m 6'1:77/4 77ILS w6g Co • / i '6�e) 1 J6 -v b 1 w fLS 77 6 � cus SiaAJ � y 19Avgowr or wits /A/G--%6 3-/9/Mf71--1 f o l Druc act/ / �' a rtis 7?) b`SS MoeC ok cue/ GI bc-//0fie L oo,) rn firrbles 7145, ?/ C 0asalv'T '77-1 / S 7-/ (? w 6.0 77-//17" ,'OI 7 '77) P1)- ; r. 'r (166),./4, ) 7 JS I>Cr°LoRM Ler 7-# Ar 7 pS /7Ts dowY�rnbNT" t4 A)L / f 61 A4R772511 b` tRi b`bb N.b.O igH / re4 „'o L /7 :-a r l . 6Sf6-*rw ' . II roz. e ? srfS 77) ) )T6? C/& E/t%?'L i P u C %, i94.6 sf /c, 3k.► L y ppy SL C? Colvsor .7"r 1s,hr7l 17/71487_,..i.• COU b0) $W7 7TH 126000r `1/IS PIM02) E IL'1s� aLwP3 S vof `'o P/07' A6CDCN1?r "Th R9Su/1i1� & vb-2 7 Y\7T-• , Ro PP,/'v z ' 3 .179/41477," a Iry T3Y tZ S (%c1 77 o J, 771 er) p.b56 u ess,-- 7WP f o ( 0Co v r.' c l L (r) bir.Eoef2 fiGt i ro 2�-��7715 X197,7 fi - u N 61Z- (/. ; - _, o,; ,, , ,:�,�, ll.'/0/\42 r9 -r' 77er V6 4T u9I?. c o u ry ct L 7Y) 13-1,71U6 AN.I P6em1T MF 7a . 'P 914 ISiteArTLY im 7�1 ' GN77 r? S tt.106c T'• 2 W t ,� • City of 2lermosa 9JeacL.. January 16, 1991 Howard Longacre 1221 7th Place Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 Dear Howard: I am writing to acknowledge your letter of January 10, 1991, regarding changes in the public participation portions of our City Council meeting. Your letter has been placed on the Written Communications for the meeting of January 22, 1991, per your request. Itis my recollection that the one minute on any subject was considered a better opportunity for public comment than the previously allowed tihree minutes only on consent items, as the public had a much higher need for early input opportunities on any matter. The Mayor has discretion to allow more than one minute if members of the public wish to speak on several items on the consent calendar. Thank you for your letter and your continued interest in improving your City. Sincerely yours, Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/mh cc: City Council DATE: TO: FROM: RE: CITYOF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM February 12, 1991 Mayor and Council City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft Supplemental to Pacific Coast Highway Parking Removal ***************************************************************** Staff has now had an opportunity to discuss with Caltrans the benchmarks suggested by our Traffic Engineer and Caltrans. We have reached a consensus on those benchmarks, as follows: A. Reduction in congestion related accidents - atleast 25%. B. Increase in vehicles - at least 750 vehicles per hour. C. Decrease in vehicles on Valley, Ardmore, Hermosa Avenue, Prospect, and Manhattan Avenue, which represent neighborhood intrusion of through traffic - at least 500 vehicles per hour. These benchmarks can be measured objectively by current, accepted methods. Also, they represent the three principal areas cited for compelling the removal of parking during the p.m. peak hours. Other considered factors were the total number of accidents, and the travel time for through traffic to complete travel through Hermosa Beach. These may also be considered in any re-evaluation triggered by failure to meet the three principal benchmarks. Staff is also recommending some clarifying changes in the pro- posed resolution, as follows: 1) The parking restrictions will take effect on March 1 "...or such later date that adequate Striping and signing have been accomplished". 2) Failure to meet a benchmark will trigger a re-evaluation of "...this parking regulation order to consider its repeal in light of it not meeting its intended purposes". 3) "This resolution shall become effective upon its approval in writing by the District Director of the California Department of Transportation". The attached resolution incorporates the recom- mended and agreed upon benchmarks noted above, and these three additional language provisions. While reaching benchmarks was made more complicated by the leave of the Public Works Director necessitated by a death in his fami- ly, staff feels that these benchmarks fairly represent a test of the logic used to impose the p.m. parking restrictions on Pacific coast Highway in Hermosa Beach. Because February 12 is a state holiday, it is not expected that Caltrans will be represented at our Council meeting. Kevin B. North raft City Manager SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 2 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. .91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING ZONE ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH CITY LIMITS, DURING THE HOURS OF 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. ON WEEK DAYS ONLY, EXCLUDING HOLIDAYS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. WHEREAS, said Pacific Coast Highway is a street operated, maintained, and controlled by the State of California, Department of Transportation, as a State Highway and therefore in accordance with the provisions of Section 22506 of the Vehicle Code of the State of California, the provisions of this resolution shall not become effective until the City of Hermosa Beach has submitted it to the Department of Transportation and obtained its approval in writing for the approval of this Resolution, and on the further condition that this Resolution shall cease to be operative six months after receipt by the City Council of written notice of withdrawal of approval by the Department of Transportation. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. "No Parking Zones" shall be established on Pacific Coast Highway as follows: A. Between Boundary Place and 25 feet north of the westerly prolongation of the northerly curb face of TennysonStreet, no 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 stopping 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays; B. Between 25 feet north of the westerly prolongation of the northerly curb face of Tennyson Street and a point approximately 235 feet south, marked by the intersection of the Hermosa Beach/Manhattan Beach city limit with the westerly curb face of Route 1, no stopping any time; C. Between 105 feet north of the northerly curb line of 24th Place and 24th Place, no stopping any time; D. Between 24th Place and 240 feet north of the northerly curb line of 16th Street, no stopping 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, except holidays; E. Between 240 feet north of the northerly curb line of 16th Street and 16th Street, no stopping any time; F. Between 16th Street and the driveway opposite and off -set 30 feet north of 15th Street, no stopping 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays; G. Between the driveway opposite and off -set 30 feet north of 15th Street and 9th Street, no stopping anytime; H. Between 9th Street and the Beach/Redondo Beach city limit Route 1; no stopping 3:00 p.m. Friday, except holidays. intersection of the Hermosa with the westerly curb face of to 7:00 p.m., Monday through 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This parking regulation order supersedes and withdraws approval of any pre-existing parking regulation on the west side of Route 1 in Hermosa Beach, except existing parking regulations as follows: A. Any posted no stopping any time zone delineated either by signs or red -painted curbs; B. Any posted no parking 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Friday, holidays excepted zone (for street sweeping) which is outside any no stopping anytime zone established by this order. This parking regulation order shall take effect midnight, March 1, 1991, or such later date that adequate striping and signing has been accomplished,and is made pursuant to the current delegations of authority from the Director of Transportation through the Chief Engineer to the District Director. SECTION 2. Benchmarks are established and shall be evaluated 12 months after implementation using data available as of that date. If any benchmarks are not met, the City and the Department of Transportation will re-evaluate this parking regulation order to consider its repeal in light of it not meeting its intended purposes. SECTION 3. Benchmarks. Goal: A 25% reduction in congestion related southbound accidents (rear -ends, sideswipes and parked vehicle 3 4 5 6 7 10 1� 12 13 14 15 16 17 II PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA related types) during the restrictions proposed by this Resolution. Goal: An increase in capacity of the curb lane in the amount of 750 vehicles per hour. Goal: Neighborhood intrusion, i.e. total reduction in traffic volume on Valley/Ardmore/Hermosa/Manhattan/ Prospect should amount to a combined total of 500 vehicles per hour when compared to latest available traffic volumes. SECTION 4. This resolution shall become effective upon its approval in writing in its entirety by the District Director of the California Department of Transportation. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1991. 18 ATTEST: 19 CITY CLERK 20 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 21 22 .417.,aw CITY ATTORNEY 23 24, 25 pworks/RESPCHPK 26 27 1246 First St. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 213/372-7322 January 31, 1991 Karl Berger, Assoc. Trans. Engr. State of CA Transportation Dept., Dist. 7 120 S. Spring St. Los Angeles, CA 90012 Good day, With regard to parking restrictions on PCH in Hermosa Beach, I totally support CALTRANS on their decision finally to improve flow conditions by forcing the City's compliance. I live off Prospect Ave. in Hermosa, and I will gratefully appreciate any measure that will encourage commuter traffic to go where it belongs instead of through my neighborhood. It is regrettable that some merchants will have difficulty with a lack of parking for patrons; however, that problem rightfully belongs to the merchants and not to the people of this City, the County, or the State. All the energy being expended on resisting the sound judgment of the studies CALTRANS has advanced is a sad tribute to the most chronic problem of our governments at every level: short-term thinking. I appreciate the professionalism of your presentation to the City Council here earlier this month. If I had been there in person, I would have apologized for the occasional rudeness you suffered at the hands of the Council and citizens. To endure comments from the Mayor of a municipality asking you to provide an "honest" and "clean deal" and insinuate that CALTRANS would do otherwise is an unwarranted indignity toward your integrity. I noticed you cited the Hermosa Beach Circulation Element, prepared by DKS. I would use this report w±th some caution; there are factual inaccuracies and omissions in the parts that I studied (specifically, total and through traffic on Prospect). While the RECEIVED FEB 0 4 199 CITY MGR. OFFICE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 element was in draft form, I wrote numerous letters to the City pointing out these inaccuracies (if you care to examine Table 10, you may come to agree). Not only were these inaccuracies uncorrected when the document was adopted eight months later, an entire appendix of technical data had been deleted by DKS (including the (data for the through -traffic sampling, which showed that the through traffic percentage for Prospect had been pulled out of thin air). At one point,I wrote the City a 32 -page letter, including copies of pages from the Element, that detailed these problems; I received assurances that the problems were being corrected. They never were So, I, too, have had some experience with the City in traffic matters; for three years, I have been writing the City letters (almost two dozen to date) about the traffic on Prospect, to no avail. (The Circulation Element has Prospect as a collector, but its daily volume well exceeds State guidelines. The City Traffic Engineer at one point agreed with me that the City should either take action to limit the volume or reclassify and rebuild. south Prospect as an arterial. After I began citing the Traffic Engineer's agreement with me, the Engineer wrote a letter basically retracting his earlier position.) I have not yet decided whether the City's inability to deal with the traffic problem is due to apathy, ignorance, malfeasance, or just good, new -fashioned, short-term thinking. I wish you well (and patience) in your future dealings with my City. Appreciatively, David R. Suess cc: Hermosa Beach City Council Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 4, 1991 Regular Meeting of February 12, 1991 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY P. M. PARKING REMOVAL Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council adopt Resolution No. 91- Establishing a No Parking Zone on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) between the north and south City limits during the hours of 3:00 to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays only. Background: On January 22, 1991 a public hearing was held at which Caltrans staff presented information explaining the need to prohibit parking along the west side of Pacific Coast Highway during the hours 3:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M., Monday through Friday except holidays. The City Council action directed staff to develop benchmarks on safety and regional mobility for a trial period and return for the meeting of 2-12-91. Analysis: The analysis is divided as follows: 1. Parking Restriction Resolution 2. Suggested Benchmarks 3. Other Matters Discussed 4. Summary 1. Parking Restriction Resolution Staff met with Caltrans to obtain their suggested benchmarks. Staff then amplified on the benchmarks to reflect the City's concerns, as reflected below. It is anticipated that staff will have an opportunity prior to February 12 to meet with Caltrans and hopefully arrive at a consensus on these benchmarks. Staff feels the test section monitoring should begin when the no parking signs are in place. Any subsequent changes by Caltrans to the striping can be reflected on the final operational report concerning how well the goals were met.. To not remove the parking by City resolution would place Caltrans in the position of using their administrative power to prohibit on a permanent basis. Caltrans' willingness to cooperate by participating in a test section for a period of time is in the spirit of the City's overall cooperative efforts with other - 1 - agencies. The City will need to alter some limited time parking signage, and assist, with maintenance of no stopping signs, publicity, and enforcement. 2. Suggested Benchmarks A. Reduction in congestion related (rearend and sideswipe) accidents occurring during the parking removal period for southbound traffic .Caltrans is suggesting a benchmark of 15%, City's Traffic Engineer has suggested 25%. B. Increase in vehicles per hour for southbound traffic during the parking restriction hours. Caltrans suggested 500 vehicles per hour, City's Traffic Engineer suggests 800 vehicles per hour. Ci Decrease in neighborhood intrusion vehicles - Caltrans indicates that they would not have statistics for this information, but estimate the 500 additional cars per hour added to Pacific Coast Highway would be from other streets in the area. City's Traffic Engineer recommends that the traffic volume on Valley, Ardmore and Hermosa Avenue should amount to a reduction of 15% of the present number of vehicles when compared to the latest volumes. It should be noted that for an evaluation to occur after twelve months, the available data would be from six to nine months. To have this data available, the City will need to work with C ltrans to capture the data from our Police Department as it is p epared to go into the state data processing records. 3. Other Matters Discussed While separate from the discussion of parking removal, several desired changes and PCH configurations might be made possible as a result of the removing of the peak period parking from the west side. These items were discussed with Caltrans and their 1 responses are reflected below: 1 i A. B. D. Possible funding for off-street parking - Caltrans was to supply additional information about possible grants available for this purpose. Changing of the striping at Pier and Pacific. Coast Highway due to the "jog" - Caltrans indicates they have approved plans for this and will institute those plans as soon as funds are available, but certainly with the changed striping for the removal of parking.. Recreate a northbound left turn pocket onto Eleventh Street - Caltrans also indicates that plans are approved for this amendment which can take place when the restriping occurs. Double left turn from Artesia Boulevard to southbound Pacific Coast Highway - Caltrans indicates this would be appropriate and advisable with the removal of parking. It has been considered as part of the environmental review of developments in Manhattan Beach. Caltrans did indicate that two through lanes would still be required onto Gould. Consideration of a signal for a left turn access from Pacific Coast Highway to Park Pacific Shopping Center - Caltrans indicated that such a signal could be considered if a developer paid traffic study indicated it could be done without great disruption of through traffic. Cost of such signal is normally borne by the developer. 4. Summary Approving the resolution allows Caltrans to initiate the necessary signsto prohibit p.m. peak hour parking. A test period of one year will allow all parties to. evaluate the safety and operational success of the project. Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: Do not remove parking, but let Caltrans initiate the prohibition using their legal administrative authority. The City could then consider litigation. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Not available for signature Anthony Antich Director of Public Works ne6 Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager cc: Caltrans R. D. Gilstrap, Senior Transportation Engineer Caltrans J. B. Baxter, District Director Assemblyman Gerald Felando Senator Robert G. Beverly Wes Bush, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce AQMD, LACTC Congestion Management Agency pwclerk/SRCCPCH 4 5 6 7 8 10 14 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING ZONE ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH CITY LIMITS, DURING THE HOURS OF 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. ON WEEK DAYS ONLY, EXCLUDING HOLIDAYS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. WHEREAS, said Pacific Coast Highway is a street operated, maintained, and controlled by the State of California, Department of Transportation, as a State Highway and therefore in accordance with the provisions of Section 22506 of the Vehicle Code of the State of California, the provisions of this resolution shall not become effective until the City of Hermosa Beach has submitted it to the Department of Transportation and obtained its approval in writing for the approval of this Resolution, and on the further condition that this Resolution shall cease to be operative six months after receipt by the City Council of written notice of withdrawal of approval by the Department of Transportation. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. "No Parking Zones" shall be established on Pacific Coast Highway as follows: A. Between Boundary Place and 25 feet north of the westerly prolongation of the northerly curb face of Tennyson Street, no 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 stopping 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays; B. Between 25 feet north of the westerly prolongation of the northerly curb face of Tennyson Street and a point approximately 235 feet south, marked by the intersection of the Hermosa Beach/Manhattan Beach city limit with the westerly curb face of Route 1, no stopping any time; C. Between 105 feet north of the northerly curb line of 24th Place and 24th Place, no stopping anytime; D. Between 24th Place and 240 feet north of the northerly curb line of 16th Street, no stopping 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, except holidays; E. Between 240 feet north of the northerly curb line of 16th Street and 16th Street, no stopping any time; F. Between 16th Street and the driveway opposite and off -set 30 feet north. of 15th Street, no stopping 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays; G. Between the driveway opposite and off -set 30 feet north of 15th Street and 9th Street, no stopping anytime; H. Between 9th Street and the Beach/Redondo Beach city limit Route 1; no stopping 3:00 p.m. Friday, except holidays. intersection of the Hermosa with the westerly curb face of to 7:00 p.m., Monday through 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 14 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This parking regulation order supersedes and withdraws approval of any pre-existing parking regulation on the west side of Route 1 in Hermosa Beach, except existing parking regulations as follows: A. Any posted no stopping_ any time zone delineated either by signs or red -painted curbs; B. Any posted no parking 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Friday, holidays excepted zone (for street sweeping) which is outside any no stopping anytime zone established by this order. This parking regulation order shall take effect midnight, March 1, 1991, and is made pursuant to the current delegations of authority from the Director of Transportation through the Chief Engineer to the District Director. SECTION 2. Benchmarks are established and shall be evaluated 12 months after implementation using data available as of that date. SECTION 3. Benchmarks. a) Goal: A _% reduction in congestion related southbound accidents (rear -ends, sideswipes and parked vehicle related types) during the restrictions proposed on this Resolution. b) Goal: An increase in of the curb lane in the amount of vehicles per lane per hour. 3 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Goal: Level of Service (LOS) on Pacific Coast Highway to improve and stabilize to LOS "D" after six months of implemented parking prohibition. Goal:: Neighborhood intrusion, i.e. reduction in traffic volume on Valley/Ardmore/Hermosa should amount to a combined total of _% of present number of vehicles, per day when compared to latest 1990 volumes. Goal: Travel speeds along Pacific Coast Highway southbound shall increase between and'_ m.p.h. during peak period of parking prohibition. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1991. ATTEST: PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNI CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: oc,t541, y (70ae pworks/RESPCHPK. James. Lissner 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (213) 376-4626 February 4, 1991 City Councilmembers City Hall Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Honorable Councilmembers: RECEIVED fEB 0 4 1991 CITY MGR. OFFICE I liked Gerald Compton's Will Rogers quote about statistics (at the 1-22 council meeting). If Berger's statistics have persuaded you to give up the PCH parking I hope you will ask Caltrans for a few things in trade, and if there is to be a test period with benchmarks, also specify a few ground rules. 1. If you agree to a 1 year test period for parking removal, that period should start and end quarterly to facilitate statistical gathering. Thus, April 1 would be better than March 1. If you are convinced, as I am, that signal synchronization would help, ask Caltrans to put all the signals between Rosecrans and Irena on the same cycle length and test that for second half of the parking removal test period - so we can see what difference full synchronization will make. 2. Ask Caltrans to guarantee in writing that, without regard to the outcome of the parking removal test, and within 3 months after the end of the parking removal test period (but not during the test period), they will: (a) Fix the, jogs just south of Pier Avenue; (b) Reduce the number of westbound lanes feeding Gould Avenue from 2 to 1 and install dual lefts. 3. Ask Caltrans to specify that with the exception of the changes noted in (1) above, they will not modify PCH/Sepulveda from Manhattan Beach Boulevard to Irena, its signals,: or their timing (except that they may increase the cross -traffic time), during the test period. Example 1 is the intersection of Ninth & PCH. In a January 3 letter to Caltrans the Police and Tony Antich identified it as our #1 accident site.' If Caltrans feels that they shouldn't wait a year SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 before doing something about that location (my stats show that Ninth & PCH accounts for 35% of all M -F peak hour accidents!), then we should gather statistics for at least 6 months after the safety modifications before we begin the parking removal test period. Example 2 is the intersection of Tennyson and PCH/Sepulveda. Caltrans has agreed with Manhattan Beach to add a signal there when the Magic Pizza site is developed. That signal could change traffic flow. The test period should end before it is installed. Example 3 is the dual lefts that Manhattan and Caltrans are installing in the near future from southbound PCH to eastbound Artesia. This too could skew the results of a test. Even a 6 month test period will hurt the PCH businesses a lot, so, despite all the above I hope you will fight. I offer the following as "causes of action." 1. At the council meeting Berger admitted that a third lane in Hermosa would overload PCH in Redondo and force changes there "by 1992." I expect that Redondo will resist any modifications, perhaps for years, as Hermosa has done so far. It seemed like Berger didn't notice that 1992 is next year! Next year, where will the big jam be, while we are waiting for additional capacity in Redondo? 2. Do you want to commit to the following process? This year we capitulate and allow Caltrans to take the parking, off of PCH. Then, 10 to 14 years from now, at the end of the "service life" of the 3rd lane, Caltrans will try to condemn 12 feet of the westside properties. I believe Caltrans will never be appeased. 3. Caltrans has not exhausted the remedies, short of parking removal, that are easily available to them. For flow improvement they have not tried full synchronization. For accident reduction, they have not addressed the problem.at Ninth Street, which is responsible for five times.as many accidents as is PM congestion (see the chart enclosed with my 12-20 letter to Mr. Katz). 4. Caltrans has implied that a third lane in the afternoon will reduce PM accident rates to the lower AM rates, but has offered no real support to their argument. At the January 22 Council meeting Mr. Berger tried to mislead you. He claimed that Manhattan has a much lower accident rate than we do. He hoped that you would accept that and then infer that our higher rate is due to our lack of the third lane. Later, when Berger was asked why the rate for the south half of Manhattan is just as high as ours, his only explanation was that it was "colored".by the congestion in Hermosa. Coloration might explain Manhattan's high rate for 8th Street and south, but does not explain the similar high rate for 8th up to MB Boulevard. Mr. Berger's reluctance to go into detail about this indicates the weakness of the Caltrans "safety" argument. Note also that Caltrans never has made a straighforward statement such,,as: "A third lane in Hermosa will reduce PM accidents to the AM level." I believe they've deliberately avoided making such a statement because (1) Caltrans cannot prove that the rate will go down and (2) further analysis will show a likely increase in the accident rate as well as the severity of those accidents. If you take away Caltrans' implied but unwritten claim of increased safety all they_ have left to offer is better traffic flow. I think that in these economic times the courts will now allow our Hermosa's economy to be further damaged simply to save commuters a few seconds. I hope that you will not let yourselves go .down in history as the City Council that turned PCH into a freeway. Sincerely, i Honorable Mayo4 and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council January 14, 1991 . Regular Meeting of January 22, 1991 PUBLIC HEARING PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY PARKING REMOVAL. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Open the Public Hearing, receive testimony. 2. Direct Staff to return with a final report. Background: On January 8, 1991 City Council set 8:00 PM on January 22, 1991 as the date and time for a Public Hearing to receive input from Caltrans on their proposal to remove parking along the west side of Pacific Coast_Highway (PCH). The times indicated to remove parking are from 3:00 PM to 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday except holidays. An invitation was sent to Senator Robert G. Beverly, Assemblyman Gerald Felando, Assemblyman Richard Katz, Kathleen Meyers, El Segundo Employees Association (ESEA), Don Camph, ESEA, Bryce Little, Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC), and Jerry B. Baxter, Caltrans. Analysis: At the January 8, 1991 meeting several questions were asked by the Council and the public. 'These questions were included in a letter to Caltrans (Attachment 1). Also attached are letters from the public. Attachment 1: Letter to Caltrans dated 1/9/91, pages 3 - 7 Attachment 2: Letter from V. Klein dated 1/9/91, pages 8 - 9 Attachment 3: Letter. from M. Wesley dated 12/24/90 pages 10 - 11 Attachment 4: Letters from W. Barr, O.D., pages 12 -.17 Attachment 5: January 8, 1991 City Council Item pages 18 - 48 Pacific Coast Highway - Parking 00001 PUBLIC HEARING PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY PARKING REMOVAL cc: Caltrans - R. D. Gilstrap, Senior Transportation Engineer Caltrans- J. B. Baxter, District Director Assemblyman G. Felando Senator R. G. Beverly ESEA - : Don Camph ESEA Kathleen Meyers Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce - W. Bush Respectfully submitted, 1411,164;14., /. A Anth:ny Antich Director of Publ. c Works AA15 Concur: Kevin B. Northci'aft City Manager 0000;2 ti January 9, 1991 City o f5iermosaTeach_.) Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254.3885 Mr. R. Dave Gilstrap Senior Transportation Engineer Department of Transportation Caltrans District 7 120 So. Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Subject: Proposal to Remove the Parking Along the West Side of Pacific Coast Highway (Route 1) During Peak Hours Dear Dave: On January 8, 1991 the Hermosa Beach City Council set 8:00 P.M., January 22, 1991 as the time and date for a public hearing to be held at City Hall 1315 Valley Drive, to receive input and discuss the proposal to remove the parking along the west side of Pacific Coast Highway (Route 1) during P.M. peak hours. Below are the questions and concerns expressed by the City Council members. In some cases I have paraphrased or interpreted their comments. Please be prepared to respond to each of the questions as it is Mayor Chuck Sheldon's intent to allow Caltrans time to respond to these questions, in order, at the start of the hearing. As I am sure you are aware, it is in the best interest of the proposal to be as prepared as possible. It was also requested by the mayor that responses be as precise as possible thereby providing a clear understanding and preventing any possible confusion. 1. Recently the State installed a traffic signal synchronization project on Route 1 between Manhattan Beach Blvd. in Manhattan Beach and. Pier Ave. in Hermosa Beach. It is our understanding that this project is not interconnected with the signals north of Manhattan Beach Blvd. Why won't the signal synchronization assist in the flow of traffic? 2. Please provide historical data, for as many years as possible, comparing the southbound accident rates in Hermosa. Beach to the southbound accident rates in Manhattan Beach during the P.M. peak between 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. so as to validate the contention that parking prohibitions are safer. ATTACHMENT 1 00003 3. There are A.M. peak hour parking restrictions along the east side of Pacific Coast Highway in Hermosa Beach;:, Please provide the comparison data showing the conditions before the parking prohibitions and the conditions after the parking prohibitions. 4. If the parking is removed along the west side. of Pacific Coast Highway: a. Does Caltrans have data on traffic that passes through the city on alternate traffic routes? How much of a reduction of traffic volumes along other or alternate north -south Hermosa Beach streets is expected by the State? b. What is the current accident rate and what is the expected accident rate six months after implementation. c. What is the current time required to travel through Hermosa Beach along PCH during the P.M. peak and what is the expected time of travel six months after implementation? Please provide details on how such a time study would be conducted, i.e. starting/ending location, which travel lane, what time of day etc. d. Quantitatively, what benefits does Caltrans expect from removal of parking on PCH? Precisely what improvement in the accident rate does Caltrans expect, or what increase in the flow rate of automobiles through Hermosa Beach, or what measurable advantage in any respect does Caltrans expect? 5. a. Is the reason for the parking prohibition to increase street capacity or to improve safety? b. Which is more critical? 6. There have been statements made that most of the traffic on Pacific. Coast Highway during the P.M. peak is from the El Segundo employment area. a. What has Caltrans done to promote carpooling, especially in the El Segundo area and with ESEA? b. Why are the employers in the El Segundo area not providing and encouraging more busses and carpooling? C. What has Caltrans done to promote more bus routes and parking lots for commuters? ATTACHMENT 1 2 _ 00004 7. There is a concern that.a traffic bottle neck would be created at Pacific Coast Highway and 190th if the curb lane was opened to traffic. Please provide the assumptions and the documentation showing: a. that moving the bottleneck would be avoided and b. how many cars cutoff on Catalina? 8. Please address the issue that westbound Aviation traffic to southbound Pacific Coast Highway traffic adds to the traffic volumes along Pacific Coast Highway. Since traffic volumes north and south of Aviation are'different should not the north and south segments of Pacific Coast highway be treated differently? 9. What is the State's long term plan for Pacific Coast Highway and the South Bay? Does Caltrans have a five, ten, or twenty year plan? a. Has Caltrans considered that employment in the El Segundo area is dropping? b. Has Caltrans considered: c. that vehicles in the curb lane pose' a potential greater danger to pedestrians because the curb lane width will be less than standard and the sidewalks are only five feet wide in some areas. The concern is heightened because in Manhattan Beach the curb lane tends to be the passing lane and_the fast lane. d. Manhattan Beach has a wider right of way than Hermosa Beach.and can better accommodate a third travel lane. Manhattan Beach has 20' sidewalks and Hermosa Beach has much _narrower sidewalks with zero set backs on the commercial buildings and the sight distance for side street vehicles would be further restricted because the parking lane currently provides some sight distance. e. Please.provide the plans for the future widening of PCH from Harbor Freeway to Los Angeles International Airport. f. If the parking restriction is implemented will Caltrans add dual left turns from westbound Artesia to southbound PCH? If so, please provide a sketch of the lane striping on Artesia. ATTACHMENT 1 . - 3 - 00005 g.. Will Caltrans correct the unusual jog in the lane stripings on southbound PCH at Pier Avenue? 10. What are Caltrans' long term plans for the South Bay, PCH in particular? Are these plans in the form of some planning document? How frequently do these plans change? What opportunity do cities and the public have to giveinput to these plans? 11. At some point a decision was made by Caltrans to initiate the process of having parking removed on PCH in Hermosa Beach. Describe how this decision was made, e.g. what was the impetus, what alternatives were explored, what research was done, who was consulted, who ultimately made this decision, and when? To make sure there is no confusion, I am interested in what happened before any correspondence between Caltrans and Hermosa began on this issue. 12. How were the quantitative estimates to the above question computed? What was the source of data used in these computations? 13. Does Caltrans expect intangible benefits that cannot be measured? What are these? 14. If Caltrans' expectations of the benefits of P.M. parking removal are not met, does Caltrans intend to restore P.M. parking? How long a test period does Caltrans feel would be necessary? 15. Has an Environmental Impact Review (EIR) been done, or even considered? Was an economic analysis included? 16. What efforts has Caltrans made to reduce traffic, in particular the single car commuting traffic on PCH? Please list the past and current projects, the amount of money spent, and the effects of these projects which are specifically designed to reduce traffic on PCH. In addition, please indicate Caltrans' long term plans and expectations for commuter traffic reduction in the South Bay. 17. Has Caltrans considered that the curb lane be limited to High Occupancy Vehicles (HOV) and emergency vehicles only? Has a reversible lane been considered as an alternative? Other questions or requests previously asked but not yet responded: ATTACHMENT 1 - 4 - 00006 18. What other alternatives were examined? (Previously asked December 31, 90.) 19. Where is the response letter to the City's October 22, 90 letter? (Previously asked December 31, 90.) I thought this list would be shorter, but apparently not. I hope there is enough time to adequately prepare for January 22, 91. If I may provide assistance, please call me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sinc ; ely, An . yAntich Director of Public Works cc: City Council AA8 ATTACHMENT 1 00007 FROM JUMP.IMC. A Retail trite, atnment f3uJiiess 01. 1 5. 1 9 9 1 13: :1 JUMP INC, 809 Pacific Coast 11wy,, I lermosa Beach, CA 90254.213 /318.2882 January 9, 1991 Mr, Robert Beverly, State Senator 1611 So. Pacific Coast Highway Room 102 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Dear Senator Beverly e My name is Verde Klein, I have owned and operated The Tender Box, 809 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach since 1973. Cel trans is a large state agency that ie responsible for moving traffic as fast as possible around the state. Their proposal is perfectly reasonable from their point of view. More lanes in Hermosa Beach means more oars out of El Segundo whether or not they arrive in Palos Verdes eariler or not. They are not really villians in this case. They are simply doing their job. To balance state issues with local issues citizens form local governments and ask their city councils to defend them. Like it or not you are now being asked to do your job. Our local.businese need the parking on the highway it those rueh hour times: We need them to compete, some need them to survive. Chamber of Commerce studies show that some of us do 50% of our busineee during those hours. if we, were aseisted with alternative parking, we would gladly give up the street parking. If you refuse to co-operate with Cal Trans, then maybe our parking problems will be addressed. But if you capitulate,: it wild never be solved. ATTACHMENT 2 FRC'M JUMP,INC. Page 2 January 9, 1991 01 15. 1991 Appeasing Cal Trane will never bring a solution to this City problem. Defying them mightt 1 implore you, the voice of our town, to Stand up for uet Very truly'yours„ Vada Klein, President Jump, Inc. Dis_tr butB, AssemblymanCommittee on Katz, Assemblyy onTransportation State Capital, Sacramento, CA 95814 Jerry B. Baxter, District Director California Dept. of Transportation 120 So. 'Spring Street, District 7 Laos Angeles, CA 90012 Hermosa Beach City Council Civic Center CA 90254 Hermosa Beach, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Kevin. Cody, Editor Easy Reader P.O. Box 427 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Timothy Woodhull, Editor Daily Breeze P.O. Box 2982 Torrance, CA 90509 Hr. Gerald Felando, Assemblyman 3838 Carson Street Suite 110 Torrance, CA 90503 ATTACHMENT 2 00009 Theret no end to the music at P.O. BOX 58900 2551 SOUTH ALAMEDA STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90058 (213) 234-3336 24 December 1990 Honorable Mayor Chuck Sheldon City Hall 1315 Hermosa Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Music Plus Hermosa Beach Caltrans Restricting Parking on PCH Dear Mayor Sheldon, It's been a while since we've last spoken, and an article in the Daily Breeze regarding Caltrans' elimination of parking on PCH caught my attention and prompted this letter to you. (By the way, congratulations on becoming Mayor!) Obviously, if Caltrans disallows parking on PCH, we, the other businesses, and all customers will be put at a tremendous disadvantage, not to mention the problems which the residents will experience as drivers circle the neighborhood searching for parking. 1 noticed (in the article) that you and Councilman Creighton both recognized the impending problem, but feared the City would have little opportunity to stop the State. We hope that the State may yet be persuaded that its proposed action is shortsighted, but failing that there is a positive action whichis within the City's power to take namely the conversion of selected residences into municipal parking areas. As you may remember, at one point Music Plus came very close to implementing additional parking, through private means, by transforming the residence next to our parking on 8th street into a parking lot, consistent with the City's General Plan. . Music Plus is not currently in a position to repeat its efforts but I remembered your support and thought it worthwhile to revisit the conversion concept. In particular I remember that after our defeat at the hearing the City Manager. Mr. Northcroft. suggested that the City's eminent domain powers could be used to correct the parking inadequacies. As PCH is Hermosa's commercial zone and center, such action by the City would seem not only appropriate, but also truly necessary. ATTACHMENT 3 00010 24 December 1990 Honorable Mayor Chuck Sheldon City Hall Music Plus Hermosa Beach Caltrans Restricting Parking on PCH Page 2 of 2 Given the seemingly imminent State action, this might be a perfect opportunity for the City to study the' lots behind the retailers on PCH and create some desperately needed parking lots. The City could install meters to fund such a program, perhaps in combination with bond issues or other revenue raising techniques. With real estate prices currently at a relative low point, distressed properties or other bargains may be available to the City, which would help keep overall costs low. I remember the courage it took for you to offer the parking resolution at our hearing, and I'm sure it will again take courage to suggest a similar solution now, but I truly feel bold steps must be taken if the City is to avoid serious injury toits commercial livelihood.. hope all is well with you, and look forward to hearing from you soon. Happy New Year! Best Regards, Mark Wesley Director of Real Estate ATTACHMENT 3 00011 WARREN BARR, O.D. PAUL C. BARR, O.D. Doctors of Optometry Jerry B. Baxter, District Director California Dept. of Transportation 120 So. Spring Street, District 7 Los Angeloes CA 90012 Dear Director Baxter: 1/9/91 Contact Lenses Family Vision Care mt.t,;ElYkU 1500 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY P.O. BOX 515 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Telephone (213) 372-5213 RE: the afternoon removal of parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway in Hermosa Beach. The claim is improved traffic flow and fewer accidents. 1 disagree that this will occur. Manhattan Beach to the north has 3 lanes available for rush hour traffic and CAL TRANS seems to think that extending the.3 lanes for 1 additional mile through Hermosa Beach will help. Perhaps, if Redondo Beach to the south had 3 lanes available. They do not. Parking or no parking. The drop off at Herondo has not been show to be significant. CAL TRANS, by their action, will harm the businesses along Pacific Coast Highway which depend on street parking. As you know, we have a parking problem in Hermosa Beach. I am fortunate to have off street parking available, but others are not so lucky. Were CAL TRANS to offer a solution to our problem (provide regional parking areas, etc.) perhaps that would help with the impact on business. I see from the enclosed article in The Daily Breeze, that Lawndale has just voted to reinstate parking on Hawthorne Blvd. to try and undo some of the damage caused to business by restrcting afternoon parking. Regarding the safety aspect, by CAL TRANS own admission the curb lane is the fastest. Manhattan Beach has 20 foot sidewalks but Hermosa Beach has only 10 foot sidewalks -- inadequate for pedestrian safety. Most vehicular accidents are T-bone left turns which will be increased with a fast curb lane as has occurred where there are stretches of no parking now. In any case, removal of parking in the afternoon is like putting your finger in the dyke --a temporary remedy at best. The only long term solution is to reduce the number of single driver vehicles on the road and the sooner that ultimate grid lock occurs, the sooner people are going to accept that. Sincerely, Warren Barr, O.D. �Ilili► �IIIIIFh American Optometric Association ATTACHMENT 4 00012 Lawndale OKs rush-hour pariung along Hawthorne By Marc Igler STAFF WRITER In a victory for Lawndale's business community, the City Council has de- cided to lift parking restrictions along busy Hawthorne Boulevard during the evening commute. Council members voted 3-2 Thurs- day night to remove "No Parking" signs on the west side of the boulevard between 162nd Street and Redondo Beach Boulevard. The signs, put up two years ago, had been bitterly opposed by business owners who said the restrictions dis- couraged customers and moved trade farther south into Redondo Beach and Torrance. The decision, which was opposed by Councilman Larry Rudolph and Mayor Harold Hoffman, must be approved by Caltrans because the boulevard is a state-owned highway. Caltrans spokesman Thomas Knox said the agency will review the request next week. The agency's main concern, he said, will be making sure it doesn't cause traffic congestion. "We generally comply with what in- dividual cities want to do, but we'll want to make sure it's in the best interest of all commuters," Knox said. The parking restrictions, enforced from 4 to 6 p.m. Mondays through Fridays, were designed to prevent bot- tlenecks by opening all three lanes to rush-hour commuters. Councilwoman Carol Norman said removing the restrictions will stimulate business activity. She rejected fears that the move would congest traffic. "Those businesses rely on street parking because they were not built with adequate parking lots," Norman said: "By opening up Hawthorne, at least customers can get inside, and the city can make a little more in sales tax." Rudolph, in voting against the pro- posal, said allowing parking on. Haw- thorne will limit rush-hour traffic to two lanes and he fears motorists will look for short cuts by driving through nearby residential streets. "It's going to be a mess. We're going to get traffic on the side streets and congestion on Hawthorne. How's paramedic supposed to get through in case of an emergency? I see this basi. cally as a safety issue." : The council's decision came after more than 30 business owners present- ed the city with a petition. It also ie supported by the Lawndale Chamber of Commerce. The east side of Hawthorne Boule- vard also has parking restrictions, from 7 to 9 a.m., but merchants have not objected to them. . . . ATTACHMENT 4 December 22, 1990 250 Torrance, California 96th year/Number 356 • ®1990 The Copley Press Inc. 00.013 WARREN BARR, O.D. PAUL C. BARR, O.D. Contact Lenses Family Vision Care Doctors of Optometry hAvmher Assemblyman Richar Katz, Chairman Assembly Committee on Transportation State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Assemblyman Katz: 1500 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY P.O.BOX 515 HERMOSA:BEACH. CA 90254 Telephone (213) 372-5213 1/9/91 I'm sure your are aware of what CAL TRANS is trying to do to Hermosa Beach regarding the afternoon removal of parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway. Their claim is improved traffic flow and fewer accidents. While they claim that "all studies show this to be true", if you read the actually studies they do not show this to be true. Manhattan Beach to the north has 3 lanes available for rush hour traffic and CAL TRANS seems to think that extending the 3 lanes for 1 additional mile through Hermosa Beach will help. Perhaps, if Redondo Beach to the south had 3 lanes available. They do not. Parking or no parking. CAL TRANS, by their action, will harm the businesses along Pacific Coast Highway which depend on street parking. As you know, we have a parking problem in Hermosa Beach. I am fortunate to have off street parking available, but others are not so lucky. Were CAL TRANS to offer • a solution to our problem (provide regional parking areas, etc.) perhaps that would help with the impact on business. I see from the enclosed article in The Daily Breeze, that Lawndale has just. voted to reinstate parking on Hawthorne Blvd. to try and undo some of the damage caused to business by restrcting afternoon parking. Regarding the safety aspect, by CAL TRANS' own admission the curb lane is the fastest. Manhattan Beach has 20 foot sidewalks but Hermosa Beach has only 10 foot sidewalks -- inadequate for pedestrian safety. Most vehicular accidents are T-bone left turns which will be increased with a fast curb lane as has occur, ed where there are stretches of no parking now. In any case, removal of parking in the afternoon is like putting your finger in the dyke --a temporary remedy at best. The only long term solution is to -reduce the number of single driver- vehicles on the road and the sooner that ultimate grid lock occurs, the sooner people are going to accept that Any pressure you can apply to Jerry Baxter at CAL TRANS would be appreciated. Sincerely, arren Barr, O.D. American Optometric Association ATTACHMENT 4 00014 WARREN BARR, O.D. PAUL C. BARR, O.D. Contact Lenses Family Vision Care Doctors of Optometry Senator Robert G. Beverly State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Senator Beverly: 1/9/91 1500 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY P.O. BOX 515 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Telephone (213) 372.5213 I'm sure your are aware of what CAL TRANS is trying to do to Hermosa Beach regarding the afternoon removal of parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway. Their claim is improved traffic flow and fewer accidents. While they claim that "all studies show this to be true", if you read the actually studies they do not show this to be true. Manhattan Beach to the north has 3 lanes available for rush hour traffic and CAL TRANS seems to think that extending the 3 lanes for 1 additional mile through Hermosa Beach will help. Perhaps, if Redondo Beach to the south had 3 lanes available. They do not. Parking or no parking. CAL TRANS, by their action, will harm the businesses along Pacific Coast Highway which depend on street parking. As you know, we have a parking problem in Hermosa Beach. I am . fortunate to have off street parking available, but others are not so lucky. Were CAL TRANS to offer a solution to our problem (provide regional parking areas, etc.) perhaps that would help with the impact on business. I see from the enclosed article in The Daily Breeze, that Lawndale has just voted to reinstate parking on Hawthorne Blvd. to try and undo some of the damage caused to business by restrcting afternoon parking. Regarding the safety aspect, by CAL TRANS' own admission the curb lane is the fastest. Manhattan Beach has 20 foot sidewalks but Hermosa Beach has only 10 foot sidewalks -- inadequate for pedestrian safety. Most vehicular accidents are T-bone left turns which will be increased with a fast curb lane as has occurred where there are stretches of no parking now. In any case, removal of parking in the afternoon is like putting your finger in the dyke --a temporary remedy at best. The only long term solution is to reduce the number of single driver vehicles on the road and the sooner that ultimate grid lock occurs, the sooner people are going to accept that Any pressure you can apply to Jerry Baxter at CAL TRANS would be appreciated. ,/Warren Barr, O.D. :ATTACHMENT 4 American Optometric Association 0001 WARREN BARR, O.D. PAUL C. BARR, O.D. Contact Lenses Family Vision Care Doctors of Optometry • The Honorable Gerald Felando Member of the Assembly State Capitol, Room 5155 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Jerry, 1/8/91 1500 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY P.O. BOX 515 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 Telephone(213) 372.5213 I'm sure you're aware of what CAL TRANS is trying to do to Hermosa Beach regarding the afternoon removal of parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway. Their claim is improved traffic flow and fewer accidents. While they claim that "all studies show this to be true", if you read the actually studies they do not show this to be true. Manhattan Beach to the north has 3 lanes available for rush hour traffic and CAL TRANS seems to think that extending the 3 lanes for 1 additional mile through Hermosa Beach will help. Perhaps, if Redondo Beach to the south had 3 lanes available. They do not. Parking or no parking. CAL TRANS, by their action, will harm the businesses along Pacific Coast Highway which depend on street parking. As you know, we have a parking problem in Hermosa Beach. I am fortunate to have off street parking available, but others are not so lucky. Were CAL TRANS to offer a solution to our problem (provide regional parking areas, etc.) perhaps that would help with the impact on business. I see from the enclosed article in The Daily Breeze, that Lawndale has just voted to reinstate parking on Hawthorne Blvd. to try and undo some of the damage caused to business by restrcting afternoon parking. Regarding the safety aspect, by CAL TRANS' own admission the curb lane is the fastest. Manhattan Beach has 20 foot sidewalks but Hermosa Beach has only 10 foot sidewalks inadequate for pedestrian safety. Most vehicular accidents are T-bone left turns which will be increased with a fast curb lane as has occurred where there are stretches of no parking now. In any case, removal of parking in the afternoon is like putting your finger in the dyke= -a temporary remedy at best. The only long term solution is to reduce the number of single driver vehicles on the road and the sooner that ultimate grid lock occurs, the sooner people are going to accept that, Any pressure you can apply to Assemblyman Katz or Jerry Baxter at CAL TRANS would be appreciated. Sincerely, "11._"t"' Warren Barr, O.D. 1IIIIIr. American Optometric • Association ATTACHMENT 4 0001E RWEIvED r n •.. . ,,,,,, GU2� de, u- dcrr/pt•e�U) p prO f o i f& i s ru.tii h 3 r CA4-i de.r-� �.r ye}). / w, -fig/ seri o-14 Ih o h ✓�vie�n,c,eJ 6-t,� t 1044; .e '. 4?If /lad_ a00 / 2r/ p Vande rRi 41.7) Re. t'- 9c.7 g- /6 S .TJX - 1°d--13- j,) 71 ja.-nee-din, & ?oA 0.2 7 (Pett,12. � i�;�,L r.J J'-�' L V q 7 3 `Z YW4711L LAR 12.�.0 91423 9 "i c • eetail /t 20 - 9,0,99 Yi iZ30 641-doz. c c 9 dtoy q •rte 2i0q PC. Sl2 2C6, 1741'n1G±11 ca, A„,( /% .%' - � G30q ?e i / S/ 26 4,691,a 13-#z& P Cha, J S, i c? /C # .,23v9 ,0 e/D J e -a. d30? /� �. / #fib �_,;,: 2, /-/L-r of -thee Cl z 3 °% C• f�- .zoo/ %( . 70 24Y 2-30q PC,. 20I, , . Clbz z � PL. 4i . z_a3, -gag 0 °lbZS( P. z. c 7,z -r -ti. .(27-/ .73 ¢ /� , 9P z i 0001.7 `-C4 eLL GegA- 013 ATTACHMENT 4 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 31, 1990 Regular Meeting of January 8, 1991 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - PARKING Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Request Caltrans staff to make a "facts and figures", presentation to the City. 2. Set the matter for a public hearing on January 22, 1991 at 8:00 p.m. Background: At the October 9, 1990 City Council meeting a Caltrans letter dated August 1, 1990 (Attachment 1) was presented to the City Council indicating Caltrans' desire to remove parking on Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) from 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday. Council directed staff to send a letter to Caltrans and to include Council's concerns. Staff sent the letter on October 22, 1990 which included Council's input (Attachment 2). The City has not received a response to the specific questions in the October 22, 1990 letter or to Mr. Ruzak's September 4, 1990 memo. On December 6, 1990 the City received a November 27th letter addressed to Honorable Richard Katz, Chairman, Assembly Committee on Transportation from Mr. Jerry Baxter, District 7 Director Caltrans. The letter (Attachment 3) indicated Caltrans' intention to remove on -street parking on PCH through Hermosa Beach. On December 11, 1990 the City received a December 3, 1990 -letter (Attachment 4) from Mr. Baxter informing the City that Caltrans will take independent action to prohibit parking along the west side of PCH (3 p.m. to 7'p.m. Monday through Friday, holidays excepted) if the City of Hermosa Beach fails to adopt the appropriate parking regulation and submit it to Caltrans, for approval within the next 60 days. Analysis: Alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Request a delay until after a public comment period. ATTACHMENT 5 �1 00018 Because of the holidays it was difficult to reach Caltrans staff. On December 31, 90 I spoke with Mr. Dave Gilstrap, Senior Transportation Engineer, Traffic Operations Branch, Caltrans. Mr. Gilstrap said it was his understanding (based on news articles) that the Council wanted the decision of parking removals to be made by Caltrans. I asked Mr. Gilstrap to provide answers to the following: Question: Would Caltrans send a representative to make a presentation (at a City Council meeting) of the facts and figures? Response: Yes, they are willing to make the presentation prior to enacting a parking prohibition. Question: What authority (State Code Section) does Caltrans have to implement this matter? Response: Mr. Gilstrap will have his staff get this answer. Question: What other alternatives were examined? Response: Mr. Gilstrap will get an answer. Question: Where is the response letter to the City's October 22, 90 letter? Response: Mr. Gilstrap will locate the response letter and forward it to the City. 2. Do nothing. This alternative will most likely bring about Caltrans' intended action. 3. Request review after six months implementation trial basis. This allows the City to request Caltrans to review the accident history, etc. after six months. 4. Propose another alternative - HOV (High Occupancy vehicle) lane. This alternative was proposed in the Circulation Transportation and Parking Element review that occurred on January 23, 1990. At the January 23, 1990 and subsequently 00019 at the March 27, 1990-meeting;-Council-=consi:dered the ::-. Li ---------- elimination of the parking.__lane and'' -to add a =southbound lane._` - along PCH during peak hour --traffic.-: °=The Planning Commission recommended approval.-- -There was -no staff consensus. The. ' --- City Manager and Public Works Director desired to convert the lane town emergency and high occupancy vehicle only lane. Summary: The best alternative considered is to request a delay until after a public hearing especially in light of information uncovered by Mr. James Lissner (Attachments 5, 6 and 7). Respectfully submitted: Anthony Antich Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft Director. of Pubic Works City Manager Attachment 1: Attachment 2: Attachment 3: Attachment 4: Attachment 5: Attachment 6: Attachment 7: City Council October 22, November 27, December 3, October 10, December 12, December 20, Item - Response to Caltrans Letter 1990 Letter from Staff 1990 Letter from Caltrans 1990 Letter from Caltrans 1990 Letter from James Lissner 1990 Letter from James Lissner 1990 Letter from James Lissner Attachment 8:. December 24, 1990 Letter from Music Plus Attachment 9: January 2, 1990 Letter from Staff cc: Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce James Lissner Jerry Baxter, Caltrans District 7 Director Dave Gilstrap, Caltrans Senior Transportation Engineer BC11 • 00020_ October 2, 1990 Honorable Mayor. and Members of 'Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council. October 9, 1990 RESPONSE TO CALTRANS LETTER Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this report. Background: On August 9, 1990, the City received a letter (attached) from Caltrans indicating their desire to remove parking on PCH from 3 P.M. to 7 P.M., Monday through Friday. The letter (and backup material) is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Analysis: Mr. Ed Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer, has reviewed the letter and prepared a response. A copy of his response will•,be forwarded to Caltrans after the October 9th Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Concur: _AA' 6 Antitany Antich Public Works D'rector pworks/srcaltr Attachment 1 -Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 00021 ik Cityo erose► each 1�yVa / 4 to4 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Harmon Beach, California 90254.3895 October 22, 1990 Department of Transportation. District 7, 120 South Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attention: R.D. Gilstrap, Senior Transportation Engineer Traffic. Operation Branch Subject: Peak hour parking restrictions Dear Sir: Thank you for your August 1, 1990 letter. The City Traffic Engineer does not concur with the conclusions reached and has prepared the attached response. On October -9, 19901' the City Council considered the matter and directed that = include their concerns. 1. The Council felt it unusual that a single complaint would generate such a time consuming response and asks why? 2. The Council thought it peculiar that this concern comes right on the heels of its recently completed Traffic Circulation Element update. After taking extensive public testimony on the matter.of parking removals, the City Council voted not to pursue the matter. 3. The Council requested that Caltrans make available; -all data supporting this conclusion that parking removals is the best choice of the several alternatives considered. 4. The Council requested information on the results of limiting parking on the east side of Pacific Coast Highway. 5. Provide all the accident data evaluated by Caltrans staff. evidencing the hours of the day when the accident odturred and potential causes. I look forward to your written response and hope we can reach Attachment 2 • 00022 Department of Transportation Page 2 concurrence. If your have any questions please call Ed Ruzak directly at (714)964-4880 or me at (213)318-0214. Sind 'ely kV4ix\./vy An ny Antich Director of Public Works cc: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Managar Edward Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer ty/meh 00023 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM ce . TO: Tony Antich, Director of Public Works FROM: Ed Ruzak, City Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Caltrans Proposed Prohibition of Curb Parking on Pacific Coast Hwy. Southbound, Herondo tol:Oth Street DATE: September 4, 1990 Reference is made to an August 1, 1990 report from Mr. Jack Gilstrap of Caltrans relative to a recommendation for curb parking removal on Pacific Coast Highway. The Caltrans study was prompted due to a request by Mr. Steve Case, a resident of Lomita, and frequent Pacific Coast Highway commuter. 1 have reviewed the report and have the following comments and suggestions I disagree that the current accident rate along the Pacific Coast Highway section in Hermosa Beach is well in excess of what is expected for "similar" facilities. I believe it is necessary for Caltrans to explain their rationale for "similar" facilities and the way that they determine what is a similar facility. This is important to compare "apples" to "apples". From what I know of Caltrans expected accident rates, they do have a valid basis. for comparison. However, it is necessary to document this. There is a serious question as to whether the peak period allowances will "reduce accidents". The report states that the predominant ,accident types are rear -end and sideswipes. It states that 25% of these types will be reduced With the peak period prohibitions. There needs to be much more documentation to convince me or others that this percentage is realistic. First, the peak period parking prohibitions will allow the curb lane to be transformed into a through lane. The width of this lane will not be 12', (the standard width). Throughout the section to be changed the lane will vary from 11.5' to 10.8'. As such, traffic will have to travel in the gutter to some degree. The propensity for loss of control or being sideswiped by an adjacent through vehicle will still exist. The cross street traffic that enters PCH will have good sight distance without the curb parking, but will enter directly into the through curb lane. If a driver places the front of his car in the through lane so it interferes with through curb lane traffic there is a greater possibility of a rear -end or sideswipe accident; i.e., the through vehicle stops suddenly or changes lanes into the adjacent through traffic. /7 Ti n. • L/ KS Li These geometric and operational conditions in the curb lane would lead to problems that could clearly offset the alleged 25% reduction of accidents due to the parking prohibitions. (w)Parking prohibitions during the a.m. peak period were implemented on the east side of ?CH for the entire length of Hermosa Beach several years ago. The merchants along this section are not open during the a.m. peak hours. Thus, they were not in opposition to the parking prohibitions. Nonetheless, Caltrans should have a sufficient accident base for the before and after time period in this section to show the benefit of prohibition in terms -of accident reduction. These data should be cited in their report. Without further definition of these critical elements I cannot support the statement made in their letter request. er - 2 - 00025 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GEORGE.DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, 120 SO. SPRING ST, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 TDD (213) 620.3550 (213) 620-3874 November 27, 1990 RECEIVED ....061990 :DEC NIP! Tr TIM UPT Honorable Richard Katz Chairman Assembly Committee on Transportation State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Mr. Katz: This is in response to your October 26, 1990 letter requesting advisement on Caltrans' intentions regarding removal of on -street parking on Route 1 in Hermosa Beach. We appreciate and share your concerns for the improvement of traffic flow and safety on Route 1 in Hermosa Beach. We also agree that removal of on -street parking would improve safety and operation on this segment of Route 1, and on the adjoining segment of Route 1 in the City of Manhattan Beach to the north. Caltrans staff has been working patiently towards obtaining concurrence from the City of Hermosa -Beach for weekday p.m. peak period parking restrictions on the west side of Route 1 in that City. However, there appears to be great reluctance on the part of the City Council of Hermosa Beach to commit to the requested action. Fear of adverse economic effects to merchants whose businesses are located. on the west side of Route 1 seems to be their chief concern. The City Council has also chosen to ignore Caltrans' studies and the recommendations of both its own consultants and planning department staff. This took place, most recently, during the latest revision to the traffic circulation element of the City's .Master -Plan when the Hermosa Beach City Council again refused to provide the needed parking regulation on Route 1 early this year. Therefore, if immediate concurrence cannot City Council of Hermosa Beach to provide regulation ordinance, it will be necessary independently institute and implement an parking regulation on Route 1. Said order February 1, 1991. Attachment 3 be elicited from the the enabling parking for the Department to order for the needed would be instituted 0002E . •r . Honorable Richard' Katz -2- November 27, 1990 It should be noted that it has been the goal of the Department to achieve its mission through a balanced, evenhanded approach in its dealings with local agencies. And, in this case, to provide a small city with ample opportunity to concur with an appropriate solution to provide both long -needed congestion relief and improved safety on a State highway within its boundaries. Sincerely, ` JERRY B. BAXTER District Director cc:KPNorthcraft, City Mgr., City of Hermosa Beach AAntich, Dir. of Public Works, City of Hermosa Beach ERuzak, City Traffic Engr., City of Hermosa Beach Kathleen Meyers, El Segundo Employers' Assoc. Bruce Lyttle, L.A. County Transportation Commission •i STATE CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY n l e Com GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, 120 SO. SPRING ST. LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 TDD (213) 620-3550 (213) 620-3874 December 3, 1990 RECEIVED EC 111990 ! UBU W RKS DEPT; Mr. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 7 -LA -1 20.62/22.161 Route 1 in Hermosa Beach Dear Mr. Antich: YOUR OCTOBER 22, 1990 LETTER REGARDING PEAK HOUR PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY IN. HERMOSA BEACH Weekday p.m. peak period parking restriction on the west side of ,Route 1 in Hermosa Beach is urgently needed to provide congestion relief and improved safety. All studies performed and information obtained by Caltrans over the past nine years indicate this need. This has all been forwarded to the City of Hermosa Beach. Nevertheless, our requests for the enabling ordinance have been turned down by the City Council, repeatedly. The congested conditions on southbound Route 1 during the weekday p.m. peak period through the southern third of Manhattan Beach and the whole of Hermosa Beach is a problem with significance to the regional State transportation network. Also, the congestion related accidents occurring at this same time on the southbound segment contribute markedly to the excessively high accident rate on Route 1 in Hermosa Beach. This condition can be alleviated by weekday p.m. peak period parking restriction on southbound Route 1 in Hermosa Beach. Therefore, Caltrans will act to provide a no stopping zone, 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, holidays excepted., along the west side of Route 1 between the north and south city limits of Hermosa Beach.. This action will take the form of an order to regulate parking as above described, and Caltrans posting the appropriate signs. Caltrans will take this independent action if the City of Hermosa Beach City Council fails to adopt the appropriate parking regulation ordinance and submit it to Caltrans for approval within the next 60 days. Attachment 4 00028 r Mr. Anthony Antich Page 2 December 3, 1990 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the area Senior Traffic Engineer, Mr. Dave Gilstrap, at (213) 620- 3304. Sincerely, J. B. BAXTER District 7 Director cc: Ms. Kathleen Meyers El Segundo Employees Association P. 0. Box 547 El Segundo, CA 90245 Mr. Bryce Little Los Angeles County Transportation Commission 818 West Seventh Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Assemblyman Richard Katz Chairman, Assembly Committee on Transportation State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 0002:x. James Lissner 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (213) 376-4626 October 10, 1990 Mr. R.D. Gilstrap Caltrans Traffic Operations Branch 120 South Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Dear Mr. Gilstrap: RECEIVEb OCT 17 1990 I reside near Artesia/PCH and read with interest your August 1 letter to the Hermosa city manager. You argue that the parking on PCH should be removed because there is (you ' claim) a higher than usual accident rate in Hermosa, this accident rate is due to congestion, and the congestion can be eliminated by the creation of a third traffic lane. I have a few questions. _ First, it looks like the "actual" accident -rates 'you've used are 24 hour figures and could include many accidents that occurred during periods when traffic was flowing freely. The computer record for each accident includes a time of day. If you wish to make a case for a congestion -related higher than -usual accident rate you should try to look at the statistics for just the congested parts of the day - or .compare the rate for the congested parts of the day to the rate for the uncongested parts of the day. Next, your. letter doesn't discuss signal synchronization. Presently, you have a "north" synchronized system covering Rosecrans to Artesia, and a "south" system which covers.Pier Avenue to Irena. They operate independently. During the PM rush the north system dumps' cars onto PCH south of Artesia without regard for whether the signals of the.south system are red or green. The result is a long queue from Boundary Place south to Pier. Avenue waiting for entry into the south system. Last year you laid cable across the North Hermosa Gap with the potential to link the two systems, but the cable hasn't been connected because, according to your engineers, the types of signals and the typical traffic flow is so different in the two areas that they can't easily be linked. I believe that the two systems can be linked, and that the North Hermosa Gap should be closed before' you again ask Attachment 5 00030 Hermosa to reconsider>its stance on parking. No amount of roadway widening can ever reduce congestion (and the related accidents) if the signals aren't synchronized! You waited 16 months to reply to Mr. Case's letter. Did you reply now because we've recently resumed asking for the very badly needed two left turns from Artesia onto PCH (see enclosed Traffic Investigation form where your engineer, cites heavy left turn demand) and you are trying to reinforce your earlier technical studies which provided only. weak support to your policy of making installation of two left turns hostage to Hermosa's removal of parking on PCH? (See attached 1985 Caltrans letter, page 1, which claims a less than 1% change in the v/c ratio should two lefts be installed.) Mr. Case's letter also leads to another question. Are complaints about PCH in Hermosa as rare as the age of his letter suggests? If you require any additional information, please call me. Sincerely, Ptti Attachments: 1. Steve Case to Caltrans, March 2, 1989 2. Caltrans to Hermosa, August 1, 1990 3. Caltrans to Hermosa, May 28, 1985, page 1 of 4 and attachment 1 of 5: Traffic Investigation form cc: /1. Ms. Kathleen Meyers, El Segundo Employers Assn. 2. City Manager, Mayor and .City Council, Hermosa Beach 3. Mayor and City Council, ManhattanBeach 4. Mr. Steve Case, Lomita 5. Easy Reader, Hermosa Beach 6. Beach Reporter, Manhattan Beach 7. Hermosa/Redondo News, Redondo Beach 8. Daily Breeze, Torrance 9. Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce • Arch 2, 1989 Steve Case 2314 Cypress Circle Lomita, CA 90717. Mr. Karl Berger .Associate Transportation Engineer CALTRANS 120 S. Spring Street Location 2-1A Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Mr. Berger: - I am writing to you to convey my frustation with the traffice flow on Pacific Coast Highway (SR 1) in the city of Hermosa Beach and offer a solution to fixthe problem. I commute from the city of Lomita to the city of El Segundo each Monday through Friday. -I always know when I enter the city of Hermosa Beach because the traffic just stops! The problem is getting so bad that traffic is backing up into the city of Redondo Beach going north in the morning and into the city of Manhatten. Beach, southbound in the afternoon. The traffic congestion can be re- lieved simply by removing the bottlenecks that are disrupting the traf- fic flow. The problem with the northbound flow in the morning is due to a bottle- neck that exists between Ninth Street and Aviation Blvd. SR 1 has three northbound lanes from the city limit at the intersection of Herondo/ Anita until Ninth Street. There is a no stopping restriction in the morning to make the curb lane into the third traffic lane. At Ninth Street, the curb lane becomes a mandatory right turn lane with the aid of a painted island to separate traffic. This act of engineering caus- es some problems. Northbound traffic in the third lane must divert to the second lane to continue north creating a bottleneck. Many drivers are either forced to divert or allow themselves to get stuck in that lane causing them to cross the solid line to enter the second lane. This now creates a safety hazard as drivers are forced to merge and most of the time, unsafe and illegal lane changes are occurring. Yesterday, a three car collision occurred here and I canonly' presume that somebody was trying to get out of the mandatory right turn lane. Because of the mandatory right lane designation,.the curb lane is now under utilized and forces the first and second lanes which are already at capacity to take up the additional vehicles that are forced to merge. The whole situation does not make any sense to. me because there are a total of three usage lanes available to through traffic except for a distance of 100 feet! The solution to this problem is to remove the.painted island,and change the curb lane to a combination straight and right turn lane. This will relieve the bottleneck, increase safety and provide maximum 'utilization for that lane. The total expense for this fix should be minimal because all that would be required is to remove the right turn only sign and sandblast the island and lane striping so that it will be broken in- stead of solid. 00032 .2o74:. 0 southbound traffic going home presents another bottleneckin _iprob- . Recently in the area between Pier Avenue and Aviation Blvd., the street was restriped to provide three southbound lanes. This was very good. However, it was also shortsided as well. When that third traf- fic lane (curb lane) reaches 10th Street, a bottleneck, occurs because of street parking. To remedy this situation, I suggest a parkingre- striction that would read "No stopping from 4:30 PM to 6:30 Pih ily". This restriction should be implemented between 10th Street aile-way to Herondo Street to allow three lanes of traffic through theea ust as it is northbound in the morning hours. .,:, . j These two changes will greatly increase the throughput and vehicle hand- ling capacity on this heavily commuted route at very little expense. I hope to hear from you soon regarding these recommendations. Sincerely, Steve Case Attachments: Map of affected area Map of SR 1 and Aviation Blvd. intersection 00033 Jim Lissner 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 376-4626 December 12, 1990 Mayor and City Council City of Hermosa Beach Honorable Councilmembers: I think we should fight 'Caltrans' order to remove parking from PCH. On what grounds? 1. They have not exhausted other, more easily obtained, remedies. For example, they have not activated signal synchronization even though the cable has been in place for over a year. 2. Their research, which purportedly supports the third lane idea, is incomplete and full of holes. If you have a hard time getting in the mood to question their expertise, look: at the terrible "straightening" job they did on PCH at Pier. For more about both of the above, see the letter I wrote to Caltrans on October 10, which was copied to you at that time. 3. They need an EIR. Please, don't give up without a fight. Sincerely, Attachment 6 James Lissner 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, California (213) 376-4626 December 20, 1990 RECEIVED DEC 2 6 1990 PUMA WORKS DEPT.. 90254,, Honorable Richard Katz Chairman, Assembly Committee on Transportation State Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Assemblyman Katz: I am writing because of Caltrans' recent ultimatum to Hermosa Beach to remove parking, approximately 150 spaces, on Route 1, or Pacific Coast Highway. I would like to bring to your. attention two facts Caltrans has not mentioned. 1. Caltrans has not synchronized the signals on PCH in Hermosa. Presently, there is a "north" synchronized system covering Rosecrans in Manhattan south to Artesia in Hermosa, and a "south" systeia which covers Pier Avenue in Hermosa south'to.Irena.in Redondo. These systems operate independently. During the PM rush the north system dumps southbound cars onto PCH south of Artesia without regard for whether the signals of the south system are red or green. The result is a long gueue stretching from the Manhattan/Hermosa boundary south to Pier, waiting for entry into the south system. Over a year ago Caltrans laid cable across the gap between the two systems, giving the ability to make the two systems operate in unison. This cable hasn't been connected because, according to the signal engineer at Caltrans, it will be somewhat difficult to find a signal timing appropriate for both systems. I believe that the two systems can easily be linked and the queue eliminated. I suspect that the real reason Caltrans is waiting is to keep the commuters hopping mad so that public pressure to remove the parking here in Hermosa will be sustained. I can also imagine that Caltrans would like to hook-up the link on the same day the parking is removed, so that commuters will attribute the improvement to the removal of the parking. I inquired about the lack of synchronization in a letter i wrote to Caltrans on October 10. They chose not to reply. Attachment 7 00035 2. Manhattan's accident rate is as high, or higher, than Hermosa's. And Manhattan already has the restricted parking that Caltrans wants to force on Hermosa as the' purported cure for our high accident rate. Caltrans knew that Manhattan's rate was as high as Hermosa's - Caltrans is ,the author of the accident rate chart ("Table I") I've attached. I believe that in Caltrans' August 1 letter the use of a statewide average for comparision was inappropriate, misleading, and was not an oversight. Based on the more appropriate Table I data, the most supportable conclusion is that we will see an increase in the number and seriousness of accidents in Hermosa if speeds are inceased by the opening of a third lane. The very low rate of accidents north of Manhattan Beach Boulevard (where most turning movements are protected by green arrows), and a tabulation (attached) of current accident statistics for Hermosa, suggest that the largest possible reduction in rush-hour accidents will be obtained by modifications at just a few locations where drivers have the incentive and opportunity to make unprotected (by a signal) turns into and across. PCH traffic. For example, improper left turns resulting in 'broadsides' (a non congestion -related accident) at the intersection of 9th and PCH accounted -for 35% of all peak -period accidents on PCH in Hermosa during the first 9 months of 1990, while p.m. peak -period congestion -related accidents (rear -enders, sideswipes) exceeding the a.m. rate accounted for only 7%. I suggested a comparison of Hermosa's accident rates to those for Manhattan in a letter I wrote to Caltrans on October 22. Again, they chose not to reply. Conclusions If reliance is made on simplistic solutions and a third lane is added to an otherwise unmodified PCH, Hermosa's accident rate will go -up, not down as Caltrans argues. To reduce accidents and,improve traffic flow through Hermosa the facts suggest the following changes. First remove, signalize or . modify unprotected turning movements to reduce broadside accidents, with a result of a 35% or greater reduction of all peak period accidents. Next, synchronize the signals so that southbound commuters can cross Hermosa with. no more than one stop. Then, and only then, if there has not been a dramatic reduction of congestion and accidents, a third lane should be tried. Addition of this third lane should be followed-up within3 months with an effort to identify and modify intersections where there is a high frequency of broadside accidents between southbound third-lane'speeders and northbound drivers making left turns. I believe that had you been made aware of the above you would not have asked Caltrans to go ahead at this time with the parking restriction. I hope you will reconsider your decision. Given the very short deadline Hermosa has been given, could you please ask your staff to call me and let me know your reaction to this letter? Sincerely, Attachments: 1. Table I, Caltrans Engineering and Traffic Survey, Sepulveda Boulevard, Manhattan Beach 2. Caltrans'to Hermosa, August 1, 1990 3. Tabulation, SWITRS Jan -Sept, 1990 cc: 1. Mr. J.B. Baxter, Caltrans 2. El Segundo Employers Association ,13. Mayor and City Council Hermosa Beach 4. Mayor and City Council Manhattan Beach 5. Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce ,L./i L47.4 41 (c'74a. 0003', TAME I E 3INEERING STUDY AND TRAFFIC SURVEY SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD (CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH) . DECEMBER, 1985 ACCIDENT AVERAGE 1984 RATE POSTED RECMIE DED MAMMY DAILY ACCIDENT PER SPEED CRITICAL SPEW STREET LIMITS WIDTH LANES TRAFFIC FREQUENCY M.V.M. LIMIT SPEED LIMIT Sepulveda Artesia to 74 6-D 47,000 21 5.05 35 39.0 35 Boulevard Longfellow Longfellow to 8th 74 6-D 47,000 45 5.45 35 36.6 35 8th to Manhattan 74 6-D 47,000 23 5.16 35 34.5 35 Beach Boulevard Manhattan Beach 74 6-D 58,000 35 3.16 35 38.5 35 Boulevard to Marine Marine to Rosecrans 74 6-D 58,000 34 3.18 35 37.5 35 NUPE: ACCIDENT RATE FCR A SECTION CF ROADWAY -IS EXPRESSED IN ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES. STATE AVERAGES FCR A 2 -LANE URBAN FACILITY IS 2.85 ACC/MVM STATEWIDE AVERAGES FCR A 4 -LANE URBAN FACILITY (UNDIVIDE{]) 5.4.39 PCC/44V4 STATEWIDE AVERAGES FCR A 4 -LANE URBAN FACILITY (DIVIDED) IS 3.29 NX/MVM D- DIVIDED HIG} AY . .1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY 1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, 120 SO. SPRING ST. LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 TDD (213) 620-3550 (213) 620-3304 August 1, 1990 GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, 'Governor RECEIVED AU G i. 3 1990 PI!RI Ir lAA1RKS.DEP% All G 91990 Mr. Kevin P. Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Northcraft: 7 -LA -1 - Var. Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Hermosa Beach We are forwarding to you the request of Mr. Steve Case for peak period parking restrictions along the west side of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) from 10th Street to Herondo Street. We strongly support Mr. Case's request. However, traffic conditions indicate that this proposed prohibition should extend from Boundary Place on the north to the south city limit .lust north of Herondo Street - Anita Street, and that the .time period should be from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.. Monday through Friday, holidays excepted. Our support for this proposal at this time is based primarily upon safety considerations. Studies produced for the Route Concept Report for Route 1 in District 7 indicate that the segment of Route 1 through Hermosa Beach has the highest accident rate of any similar segment in Los Angeles County. We have also recently completed an accident study on Route 1 in Hermosa Beach for the 5 1/4 year period of January. 1,, 1985 through March 31, 1990. This study is addressed to the issue of determining whether an accident reduction could be achieved by providing southbound p.m. peak period parking restrictions on Route 1 as discussed above. As a result of this, our most •recent study, it has been determined that the accident rates on Route 1 in the City of Hermosa Beach are as follows: PCH. Anita/Herondo to Artesia/Gould NB & SB Actual* Expected* F F+I All .F F+I All .008 2.54 5.33 .021 1.32 3.30 Mr. Kevin P. Northcraf August 1, 1990 Page 2 - Sepulveda Blvd., Gould To Boundary SB Only Actual* F F+I All Exbected* F+I All .000 2.13 5.20 .023 1.27 3.30 *These rates are accidents per million vehicle miles: expected .is based upon statewide average for like facilities. :Please notice -that the rates for all actual accidents are far above'the rates for all expected accidents. It is likewise for - the fatal plus injury accidents. This history. indicates the need for safety improvement. We also examined the relationship of the freauency of occurrence of the. two primary congestion related accident types, rear -end and. sideswipe, to all accidents, to all accidents on weekdays. and to all accidents on weekdays in the directional peak periods. It has been determined that a significant potential accident reduction can be achieved by implementing the aforementioned southbound p.m. peak period weekday parking restrictions on Route 1 in Hermosa Beach. The potential accident reduction in the southbound direction on weekdays in the p.m. peak period (3:00-7:00.p.m.) would be 25% of congestion related accidents occurring in this direction during this period. It should'be remembered that this is based on existing reported' accidents, and that reportage of property damage only type accidents is quite low '(about 30-40%). • This represents a potential reduction of about 6 accidents per year within the 1.58 miles of southbound.Route 1 in Hermosa Beach. However, because of the existing accident history, any potentially achievable accident reduction measure deserves serious consideration. In view of this, we are, renewing our reauest for the City of Hermosa Beach to pass the necessary ordinance to enable the implementation and enforcement of parking restrictions along the westerly side of PCH/Sepulveda Boulevard (Route 1) from the south city limit (north of:Herondo Street) to Boundary Place. This ordinance should regulate parking by . creating a "No Stooping 3 to 7 P.M. Monday thru Friday, Holidays Excepted" zone within the limits described. Mr. Kevin P. Northcraft August 1, 1990 Page 3 If you require any additional information. please contact Mr. Karl F. Berger of my staff at (213) 620-3829. Sincere',= R. D. GILSTRAP Senior Transportation Engineer Traffic. Operations Branch Attachments: 1. Letter of Mr. Steve Case 2. Accident Study 3. TASAS Table.B Selective Accident Rate Calculation Printouts • 4. TASAS Selective Accident Retrieval Summaries, Only. cc:' El Segundo Employers Association Attention Ms. Kathleen Meyers 4975 Marshall Drive Culver City. CA 90230 00041 PCH (Route 1) in Hermosa Beach Monday -Friday Directional Peak Period Accidents Annotated with Cross -Street Location of Accident Derived from SWITRS.(Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System) Report for Jan -Sept 1990, by James H. Lissner. Format per page 2 of 4 of Attachment No. 2 to Caltrans August l letter. Accident entry coding: First two letters indicate type of accident: Congestion -related accidents: Re = rear -ender Ss = side swipe Non congestion -related accidents: Br = broad side Pe = pedestrian Ru = run off" Ws = wrong side Cross -street (of accident) is next, followed by SWITRS page number Table is on following page. 00042 Congestion -Related (CR) NB 6-10 am SB 3-7 pm Ss24thPg20 Re17thPgl8 Re24thPg19 Re2ndPg30 Re32ndPg20 Yearly Rate (YR) 1.3 Dist. YR/mi 1.298mi 1.0 4 5.3 1.580mi 3.4 4.4% 19.2% 4.5% 19.0% All Others NB 6-10 am Pel6thPg18 Brl9thPg19 Br19thPg19 Rul9thPg19 Br4thPg20 Br4thPg20 Br5thPg20 Br5thPg21 Br6thPg21 Br6thPg21 Br7thPg21 Br9thPg23 Br9thPg23 Br9thPg24 Br9thPg24 Br9thPg24 Br9thPg24 Br9thPg25 Br9thPg25 Br9thPg25 WsllthPg29 21 Add CR:. 1 All Acc: 22 (Non CR) SB 3-7 pm PePierPgl4 Br2lstPg16 BrlithPgl7 Br1lthPg17 BrllthPgl8 BrllthPgl8 BrllthPgi8 Br6thPg21 Br7thPg22 Br8thPg23 Br9thPg23 Br9thPg23 Br9thPg24 Br9thPg24 Br9thPg25 Br9thPg25 BrLongPgll 17 4 21 29.3 28 1.298mi 1.580mi 22.6 17.7 YR/mi of CR accidents % of the YR/mi of all Peak Period accidents DIRECTION as a M -F BY CR accidents as a .% of all M -F Peak Period accidents BY DIRECTION CR accidents as a % of all M -F Peak Period accidents 2.3% 9.3% IN BOTH DIRECTIONS 7% 2.9% Potential reduction of all M -F Peak Period accidents, both directions, with modifications at 9th Street Potential. reduction of all M -F Peak Period accidents, both directions, assuming that addition of a 3d lane would reduce evening CR rate to that for morning Potential reduction of ALL PCH accidents (24x7 hours), both directions, assuming that addition of a 3d lane. would reduce evening CR rate to that for morning There's no end to the music at: sic+plUs a.y�z P.O. BOX 58900 2551 SOUTH ALAMEDA STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90058 (213) 234-3336 24 December 1990 Honorable Mayor Chuck Sheldon City Hall 1315 Hermosa Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Music Plus Hermosa Beach Caltrans Restricting Parking on PCH Dear Mayor Sheldon, It's been a while since we've last spoken, and an article in the Daily Breeze regarding Caltrans' elimination of parking on PCH caught my attention and prompted this letter to you. (By the way, congratulations on becoming Mayor!) Obviously, if Caltrans disallows parking on PCH, we, the other businesses, and all customers will be put at a tremendous disadvantage, not to mention the problems which the residents will experience as drivers circle the neighborhood searching for parking. 1 noticed (in the article) that you and Councilman Creighton both recognized the impending problem, but feared the City would have little opportunity to stop the State. We hope that the State may yet be persuaded that its proposed action is,shortsighted, but failing that there is a positive action which is within the City's power to. take - namely the conversion of selected residences into municipal parking areas. As you may remember, at one point Music Plus came very close to implementing additional parking, through private means, by transforming the residence next to our parking on 8th street into a parking lot, consistent with the City's General Plan.. Music Plus is not currently in a position to repeat its efforts but I remembered your support and thought it worthwhile to revisit the conversion concept. In particular I remember that after our defeat at the hearing the City Manager. Mr. Northcroft, suggested that the City's eminent domain powers could be used to correct the parking inadequacies.. As PCH is Hermosa's commercial zone and center, such action by the city would seem not only appropriate, but also truly necessary. Attachment 8 f. . 24 December 1990 Honorable Mayor Chuck Sheldon City Hall Music Plus Hermosa Beach - Caltrans Restricting Parking on PCH Page2of2 Given the seemingly imminent State action, this might be a perfect opportunity for the City to study the lots behind the retailers on PCH and create some desperately needed parking lots. The City could install meters to fund such a program, perhaps in combination with bond issues or other revenue raising techniques. With real estate prices currently at a relative low point, distressed properties or other bargains may be available to the City, which would help keep overall costs low. I remember the courage it took for you to offer the parking resolution at our hearing, and I'm sure it will again take courage to suggest a similar solution now, but I truly feel bold steps must be taken if the City is to avoid serious injury to its commercial livelihood.. hope all is well with you, and look forward to hearing from you soon. Happy New Year! Best Regards, Mart( Wesley Director of Real Estate 00045 City of !Jlermosn I3eacL January 2, 1991 Mark Wesley Director of Real Estate Music Plus P.O. Box 58900 Los Angeles, CA 90058 Dear Mr. Weley: Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 I am writing to acknowledge your letter to Mayor Sheldon, dated December 24, 1990. Your letter and this response is being copied to the entire City Council. Regarding your comments on Caltrans.' announced intention to ban afternoon parking on Pacific Coast Highway, this issue is agendized for the January 8, 1991 Council meeting. Your letter will be included in the agenda material on this subject. Regarding the possibility of adding to the publicly owned sites along the highway, there are currently no plans or funds to consider such a venture, though placement of a structure on the City -owned lots on the westside between 2nd and 3rd Street has been discussed with some PCH businesses. The City has recently created a separate board of Parking Place Commissioners to manage the existing vehicle parking district in the downtown area. While their jurisdiction is for this district only, it is possible that they may wish to consider recommending creation of additional districts to serve commercial areas along the highway as well. For this reason, I am copying your letter to our General Services Department, which serves as the liaison to the board, so your interest could be passed on to that body. On. behalf of the Mayor and Council, thank you for your interest in improving our City. Sincerel yo rs, Kevin B. Nort"craft City Manager KBN/mh cc: City Council General Services Director Cindy Wilson Public Works Director Anthony Antich Attachment 9 00046 December 4, 1990 City of 2lerniosa l�eackv Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Mr. R. D. Gilstrap Caltrans Department of Transportation District 7 120 So. Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Subject: Pacific Coast Highway Concerns Regarding Traffic Circulation Dear Mr. Gilstrap: The City Traffic Engineer and the Police Department representatives met recently to discuss mutual concerns regarding the traffic operation along Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) between 9th Street and 16th Street. The following concerns are remitted to you for future study and action. - Once again we have had private citizens, the Hermosa Valley School representatives, and Hermosa Pavilion personnel express their concern for the installation of a traffic signal at PCH/16th Street. Two points for your consideration beside the conventional traffic signal warrant satisfaction include the fact that pedestrian activity crossing PCH to reach the Pavilion will increase due to the opening of a video arcade. Second, the long free flow distance from the signal at 21st Street to Pier Avenue tends to bring higher travel speeds. This is not desirable as traffic passes the pedestrian crossing at 16th Street. The Police Department has brought to our attention a problem with respect to the PCH section between 9th and 10th Street. There are numerous violations of left turns across the "double -double" yellow lined median. Our police department are writing numerous tickets at this location for turning violations. We would appreciate your study of this section to determine if additional signs, coning, or a raised median would be an effective means of controlling these violations. - We are still concerned with the through curb lane and jogged striping for PCH southbound from north of Pier Avenue through Aviation Boulevard. We believe that the end of the lane near 10th Street still creates a merge problem. We are 00047 .. • w Mr. R. D. Gils.trap Caltrans Department of Transportation District.? December 4, 1990 Page 2 receiving suggestions that the southbound curb lane north of Pier Avenue be turned into a "right turn only" lane. Appropriate signing and transitions would be needed to avoid a "trap" situation, but we believe the operation of PCH from a safety standpoint would be enhanced with this change. We would, appreciate your study of this issue. Thank you again for your continued cooperation with the City of Hermosa Beach. Respfully submitted, Ed Ruzak City Traffic En eer cc: John Kearin, Hermosa Beach Police Department Ken Nelson, Executive Assistant - Caltrans er1 CHIROPRACTIC OFFICE 2309 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE 207 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 TELE: (213) 376-8721 January 4, 1991 Jerry B. Baxter, District Director California Department of Transportation 120 South Spring Street, District 7 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Mr. Baxter Restricted Pacific Coast Highway parking will severely impact the safety, health and convenience of my patients, and will result in negative financial impact on Hermosa Beach. The business and professional community oppose this measure. Sincerely, Ann Coop , D.C. AC:dh cc: Assemblyman Richard Katz, Chairman Assembly Committee on Transportation State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Hermosa Beach Chamber of CommPrcP P. 0. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION HERMOSA FUNDING GROUP 2699-A PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 213 / 374-7036 Assemblyman Richard Katz, Chairman Assembly, Committee on Transportation State Capitol Sacramento, Ca. 95814 Dear Sir, January 14, 1991 I am writing to you relative to proposed intention of CALTRANS to eliminate parking in southbound curblane of Pacific Coast Highway in Hermosa Beach. Myself and a partner are owners of commercial property located 2697-2699 Pacific Coast Highway in Hermosa Beach. The rear of the property is leased to a car repair shop which has been at this location for 15 years. Without the ability of their customers to park on Pacific Coast Highway revenues to them would be seriously affected and they would probably be forced to re- locate elsewhere. Small businesses rely on this walk-in traffic and easy accessibility for their volume; and in fact that is the very reason they located on Pacific Coast Highway in the first place. The front office space available on our property would also show a reduction in square foot income, as it also would be less desirable. Congestion on Pacific Coast Highway is not the responsibility of small business owners in Hermosa Beach. The answer to the traffic problem may be to widen Pacific Coast Highway thru Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and Redondo Beach. Let's here some proposals and cost evaluations on this. There is no question but that we as well as other small businesses along this corridor will be seriously damaged financially should CALTRANS be successfull in eliminating parking in southbound curbianes here. Whatever happened to the red car line track proposal? That's what we need. Sincerely, '/Sharon B. Wright`' SBW/bb COPY: Hermosa Beach City Council Jerry B. Baxter, California Dept. of Transportation ~� / H3loctiez 'World ERMOSA BEACH, CA 90211, To : Hermosa Beach City Council • Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 4 Jan 91 • Subject : Restriction parking on the West side of PCH during eveninq rush hours. Dear Sir This letter iswritten e er wr en t o express our concern on the subject issues. As a owner. of a business on the west side of PCH, • we strongly oppose the implementation of Caltrans's demand and encourage the Hermosa Beach City to stand on its current position to resist the change and advise Caltrans to consider other alternate to resolve traffic problem along the PCH. 1. We are running a flower shop on the west side of PCH. Our business is very heavily depending on the south' bound • evening customers; Since we don't have sufficient off street parking ( we recently just lost two precious parking due to City's bow to Caltran's requirements ) , at least 80% of our business is gained from evening customers and majority of our customers are using street parking ( west of PCH ) for sopping in our shop. If Caltran choice to shut down evening parking on west of PCH, our business will be severely damaged. 2. We agreethe 7 points/reasons which the Chamber of Commerce have published on the Hermosa Sun,dated Jan 91, explaining why people in Hermosa Beach do not agree with Caltran's ideal. 3. Please let us know if we can be any help. Thanks for the support. Shi ' n 'er, Flower World Y}��. �]� /~ r�� 4/1— / / �c %. ` U z4 e +*.re mr,//»flm� 67At.' ' `^ �6 / h r 4 r Aglf. �^��, r�*/- � �� �o^« ��U� �t�° rl ~ /^� � ' ,=� y»v�fi� �/�'�."--�� r . Jerry B. Baxter, District Director California Dept. of Transportation District 7 - - 120 So. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Sir: January 15, 1991 The residents in the complex where I live at 1821 Pacific Coast Highway are very upset that your agency plans to eliminate the parking on the west side of the street in the afternoon hours. Vehicles already race down P.C.H. and we fear that in an accident situation they could come right up on the sidewalk if they were in the curb lane. This already happened on the other side of the street in the 800 block. A car crashed into a store front. Eliminating this parking would preclude any of us from having company or visitors in the late afternoon. People already park in our complex and block us off. If the street parking was taken away, this situation would get even worse. We have a hard time getting out of our driveway as it is. With one more lane of traffic we would be almost completely bottled up until 7 P.M. What if we had to get out in an emergency? S inc rely, 44 obert Postle 1821 Pacific Coast Hwy. #35 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Copy: Assemblyman Richard Katz Assemblyman Gerald Felando Senator Robert Beverly Hermosa Beach City Council Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 YOUR HELP IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the matter of eliminating the PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on P.C.H., so this could have an affect on you. CALTRANS is insisting that this parking be eliminated. The City Council is supporting thechamber's attempt to change this order from CALTRANS. Please assist us by filling., out this form. It would be appreciated if you could also send a letter. See the attached instructions. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: ( Check one ) Yes Comments: or)( y 4 J is t s o,N) No No Position 1��2rCr�G PCH, Date \Cre- Name of Business 2687 tk4t5 t"b-tc c StsViiiLLy tn104t2 Address C �t My g u,s r» ("<ss , to rho\i rz o t�)c�-�.y .067 wo'4r2t� Cc Q( ( vq N i i 2r4 (-- 12G -a y C , c,.► t�4 c crt i S 1-i N.L1-) c(Ht a. -y t✓h194� s r t3 c hc:�2 )410, We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 22, 7:30 P.M., so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. ,rz. os�t C 4 A-i�(Ccs, q O2 S Signature Th•nk you, / ./ Wesley. •Bush Executi e Vice Pres. Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90204 YOUR HELP IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public .hearing on the matter of eliminating the PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on P.C.H.,.so this could have an affect on you. CALTRANS is insisting that this parking be eliminated. The City Council is supporting the chamber's attempt to change this order from CALTRANS. Please assist us by filling out this form. It would be appreciated if you could also send a letter. See the attached instructions. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: ( Check one ) Yes Comments: No No Position Sc9o C,Ocia fC f Name of Business • � 1 We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January .22, 7:30 P.M., so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Th.nk you, Wesley 1i . Bush Executi e Vice Pres. Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 YOUR HELP IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the matter of .eliminating the PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on P.C.H., so this could have an affect on you. CALTRANS is insisting that this parking be eliminated. The City Council is supporting the chamber's attempt to change this order from CALTRANS. Please assist us by filling out this form. It would be appreciated if you could also send a letter. See the attached instructions. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: ( Check one ) )(_ Vii/r/ Yes No No Position Date Comments: /i/t 4010.1 AP- S I o U Name of Business Z / ( Pi.. 1/ ArloW Address Signature We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 22, 7:30 P.M., so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Th.nk you, Wesley1i. Bush Executi e Vice Pres. Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 YOUR HELP IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the matter of eliminating the PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on P.C.H.; so this could have an affect on you. CALTRANS is insisting that this parking be eliminated. The City Council is supporting the chamber's attempt to change this order from CALTRANS. Please assist us by filling out this form. It would be appreciated if you could also send a letter. See the attached instructions. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: ( Check one ) Yes Comments: No No Position Date Name Business 6 5 - Address We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 22, 7:30 P.M., so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Th.nk you, Wesley1i. Bush Executi e,Vice Pres. Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 YOUR HELP IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the matter of eliminating the PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on P.C.H.; so this could have an affect on you. CALTRANS is insisting that this parking be eliminated. The City Council is supporting the chamber's attempt to change this order from CALTRANS. Please assist us by filling out this form. It would be appreciated if you could also send a letter. See the attached instructions. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: ( Check off") Yes Comments: No No Position Date {2 5 A s -- Name Name of Business 4rt.7 r Add es- Signature We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 22, 7:30 P.M., so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Th.nk you, Wesley1i. Bush Executi e Vice Pres. Chamber of Commerce P.U. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 YOUR HELP IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public ,hearing on the matter of eliminating the PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. That.would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on P.C.H., so this could have an affect on you. CALTRANS is insisting that this parking be eliminated. The City Council is supporting the chamber's attempt to change this order from CALTRANS. Please assist us by filling out this form. It would be appreciated if you could also send a letter. See the attached instructions. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: ( Check one ) Yes Comments: No Position 77 Date k-771 P\ kt6 Name of Business We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 22, 7x30 P.M., so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Th.nk you, Wesley `i . Bush Executi. e Vice Pres. cPrv_ Chamber of Commerce P.O Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 YOUR HELP IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the matter of eliminating the PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on P.C.H.; so this could have an affect on you. CALTRANS is insisting that this parking be eliminated. The City Council is supporting the chamber's attempt to change this order from CALTRANS. Please assist us by filling out this form. It would be appreciated if you could also send a letter. See the attached instructions. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: ( Check one ) Yes Comments x No No Position Date OPA.vC.,/54/0 SO4/-75 rice. Name of Business r.Pr/. Ng<,n6s4 Address We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 22, 7:30 P.M., so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Th.nk you, Wesley i. Bush Executi e Vice Pres. I1UEjC+alas P.O. BOX 58900 2551 SOUTH ALAMEDA STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90058 (213) 234-3336 24 December 1990 Honorable Mayor Chuck Sheldon City Hall 1315 Hermosa Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Music Plus Hermosa Beach Caltrans Restricting Parking on PCH Dear Mayor Sheldon, It's been a while since we've last spoken, and an article in the Daily Breeze regarding Caltrans' elimination of parking on PCH caught my attention and prompted this letter to you. (By the way, congratulations on becoming Mayor!) Obviously, if Caltrans disallows parking on PCH, we, the other businesses, and all customers will be put at a tremendous disadvantage, not to mention the problems which the residents will experience as drivers circle the neighborhood searching for parking. noticed (in the article) that you and Councilman Creighton both recognized the impending problem, but feared the City would have little opportunity to stop the State. We hope that the State may yet be persuaded that its proposed action is shortsighted, but failing that there is a positive action which is within the City's power to take - namely the conversion of selected residences into municipal parking areas. As you may remember, at one point Music Plus came very close to implementing additional parking, through private means, by transforming the residence next to our parking on 8th street into a parking lot, consistent with the City's General Plan. . Music Plus is not currently in a position to repeat its efforts but I remembered your r support and thought it worthwhile to revisit the conversion concept. In particular I remember that after our defeat at the hearing the City Manager. Mr. Northcroft, suggested that the City's eminent domain powers could be used to correct the parkins inadequacies. As PCH is Hermosa's commercial zone and center, such action by the city would seem not only appropriate, but also truly necessary. Attachment 8 24 December 1990 Honorable Mayor Chuck Sheldon City Hall Music Plus Hermosa Beach - Caltrans Restricting Parking on PCH Page 2 of 2 Given the seemingly imminent State action, this might be a perfect opportunity for the City to study the' lots behind the retailers on PCH and create some desperately needed parking, lots. The City could install meters to fund such a program,' perhaps in combination with bond issues or other revenue raising techniques. With real estate prices currently at a relative low point, distressed properties or other bargains may be available to the City, which would help keep overall costs low. I remember the courage it took for you to offer the parking resolution at our hearing, and I'm sure it will again take courage to suggest a similar solution now, but I truly feel bold steps must be taken if the City is to avoid serious injury to its commercial livelihood.. I hope all is well with you, and look forward to hearing from you soon. Happy New Year! Best Regards, Mark' Wesley Director of Real Estate Lawndale OKs rush-hour paring along Hawthorne By Marc Igler STAFF WRITER In a victory for Lawndale's business community, the City Council has de- cided to lift parking restrictions along busy Hawthorne Boulevard during the evening commute. Council members voted 3-2 Thurs- day night to remove "No Parking" signs on the west side of the boulevard between 162nd Street and Redondo Beach Boulevard. The signs, put up two years ago, had "Those businesses rely on street parking because they were not built with adequate parking lots," Norman said. "By opening up Hawthorne, at least customers can get inside, and the city can make a little more in sales tax." Rudolph, in voting against the pro- posal, said allowing parking on Haw- thorne will limit rush-hour traffic to two lanes and he fears motorists will look for short cuts by driving through nearby residential streets. "It's going to be a mess. We're going been bitterly opposed by business owners who said the restrictions dis- couraged customers and moved trade farther south into Redondo Beach and Torrance. The decision, which was opposed by Councilman Larry Rudolph and Mayor Harold Hoffman, must be approved by Caltrans because the boulevard is a state-owned highway. Caltrans spokesman Thomas Knox said the agency will review the request next week. The agency's main concern, he said, will be making sure it doesn't to get traffic on the side streets and congestion on Hawthorne. How's a paramedic supposed to get through in case of an emergency? I see this basi, cally as a safety issue." The council's decision came after more than 30 business owners present- ed the city with a petition. It also is supported by the Lawndale Chamber of Commerce. The east side of Hawthorne Boule- vard also has parking restrictions, from 7 to 9 a.m., but merchants have not objected to them. cause traffic congestion. "We generally comply with what in- dividual cities want to do, but we'll want to make sure it's in the best interest of all commuters," Knox said. The parking restrictions, enforced from 4 to 6 p.m. Mondays through Fridays, were designed to prevent bot- tlenecks by opening all three lanes to rush-hour commuters. Councilwoman Carol Norman said removing the restrictions will stimulate business activity. She rejected fears that the move would congest traffic. December 22, 1990 250 Torrance, California 96th year/Number 356 01990 The Copley Press Inc. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA'90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that, a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will helpto formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: N4 No No Position y c' -es ce Mbl? Name of Business We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley lY. Bush Executive Vice Pres. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business islocated on the west side of thestreet, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes No No Position Comments: .46z;v/22 Name of Business 07--s 4,47c//cc. ce):vf-i-MV Address Tel No. y97 Si •` ature We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, ,January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley . Bush Executive Vice Pres. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street; so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on- this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we. stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: No Position o (24 SS Name o Business ,Address , % Tel No. Signature We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank'you,- Wesley D'✓ Bush Executive Vice Pres. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on, the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON' THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to.the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: No Position We,need:the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be'appreciated.. Thank you,. Wesley D4! Bush Executive Vice Pres. aims sinissia-, HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH,CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component oi,this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC.COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to .the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will. know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating t parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: heck one) Yes Comments: ()WA] - 2 No Position 00A it61-14 Name of Business 3c'7 Pi '•• c (5(7,447 - Address Tel Mo. • Signature We need the information' for the CoUncil-Meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley J3 Bush Executive'Vice Pres. iwmmo s ._. C .111116.= =- �- �a a HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that .PARKING ON THE WEST. SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on Lhis matter and. reportedto.the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: V No No Position Name of Business Address 7 Signature Tel No. We need the -information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, v Wesley D. Bush Executive Vice Pres. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this pian proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an.affect on you. The Chamber board has asked -that a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help' to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments No No Position Nance of Business )91? 9 �c� Address Tel No. We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you; Wesley IY. Bush Executive Vice Pres. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING 'ON. THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE -ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this. could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and. reported. to the City Council. This will help to formulate .the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of. :Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: No No Position '; \kI PgiAg.N`j-. Name of Business ( h S VaFic etA ST klLL 31- Address : .r, f: TekjNo. Signature We need the information for the Cotincil meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley D'' Bush Executive Vice Pre MIME= IIMIMMM HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE. WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC.COAST HIGHWAY BE EhIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported..to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's_ position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand, Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of. Pacific Coast Highway -is: (Check one) Comments: No Position / Ce in OS4 Name of Business 3:9 Picttfr1L yrs• • - Adi. 'ss ure 379- 7,U// 0. We need the information for the.Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley D. Bush Executive Vice Pres. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City .Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component,:of.this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST'HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of thestreet, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber. board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where . we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast 'Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: No OP, S v�-� Name of Business No Position SDK t N CbLk )1111/(Add RC t - Address 3->X-51 /3 Tel No. Signature We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley D. Bush Executive Vice Pres. T mei HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: x No No Position Name of Business Address Tel No. nature We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley D. Bush Executive Vice Pres. 11111111011110101. a�. s entmom HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the= .Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of HermosaBeach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON'.THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would he the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey he made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: No No Position 0/6E4" 652./_ Name of Business $76 6? Ad. - 401101.4P- gnature Tel No. We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, ,( Wesley LY! Bush Executive Vice Pres. a�- air IMMOMMEIr HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: No No No Position Name of Business We need. the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley . Bush Executive Vice Pres. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach.. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. 'Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is; (Check one) Yes No , No Position Comments: GMT- Name 2 F/ E Name of Business 44- Pew Address Signature Tel No. We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley Dr: Bush Executive Vice Pres. T� HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE EhIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes.. Your business is located on the west side of the street., so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the' west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) 'Yes Comments: No Position ,rz Name of usiness f5b S' ! Addres$'' Com, 3) 376i7 / Tel No. We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley . Bush Executive Vice Pres. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate thechamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. .Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: No No Position [6.,6t - Name of Business 105 Pc,FI 5714-7025 Tel No. We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley I . Bush Executive Vice Pres. z ammil 1•1111=11M AIM SO --- T 111111111.__Agms. �'_�W! HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. Please assist us,by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes Comments: ;7i; 5- ,IV o 4 %Lr c-14! s Fro DLI h .b No Position C 6 S.5 Name of Bu iness g53 Addre etc -He -4- -34-766a Tel No. SignaLur We need the information for the Council meeting`on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley n Bush Executive Vice Pres. _ 2J;JLLr mom— — •� HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE/P.O. BOX 404 HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (213) 376-0951 s YOUR OPINION IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan for the City of Hermosa Beach One component of this plan proposes that PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BE ELIMINATED, That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on the west side of the street, so this could have an affect on you. The Chamber board has asked that a survey be made on this matter and reported to the City Council. This will help to formulate the chamber's position on the issue so that the Council will know where we stand. 'Please assist us by filling out this form. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: (Check one) Yes/XL Comments: No No Position &V7o:944 Name of Business 2/i P7 C. 372--90, 0 Address We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 9, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Thank you, Wesley D. Bush Executive Vice January 15, 1991 Hotel Hermosa Our ocean view and sunsets are something special Assemblyman Richard Katz, Chairman Assembly. Committee on Transportation State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Assemblyman Katz: We are writing to you in regard to the proposal to eliminate parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway in Hermosa Beach. While CALTRANS has the authority to do this without any consideration for the businesses located on P.C.H., we hope you will use your good offices to prevent them from doing so. We feel that the reasons against this action are many, and offer the following for your consideration: Many small businesses along P.C.H. rely on the availability of this parking for much of their business. And considering that 70% of the total sales tax revenue to Hermosa Beach is generated by the businesses on P.C.H., losses in this revenue due to lost business in the area would impact unfairly on the residents. The bulk of the traffic is generated by the large companies in El Segundo, and the airport area. It is not fair to the people, and the businesses in Hermosa Beach, that they be penalized for this condition. Lack of parking might cause motorists to park in residential areas causing negative impact in those neighborhoods. Traffic through our neighboring cities of Manhattan Beach, and Redondo Beach is just as heavy as through Hermosa Beach, 'so the banning of parking in our city would not really eliminate any congestion. It would merely create an accordian action, which would solve nothing. If any action affecting parking is truly necessary, it would make more sense, and impact the businesses far less, to impose parking restrictions only during those hours when traffic is heaviest. Perhaps 3Pm or 4Pm to 6 PM or 7Pm would be in order. Please take these thoughts into consideration, and review the situation with CALTRANS, before they take this action. ely e R. . Pfeiffer Hotel Manager 2515 Pacific Coast Highway • Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 318-6000 •.(800) 331-9979 • FAX (213) 318-6936 Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 YOUR HELP IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the matter of eliminating the PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on P.C.H., so this could have an affect on you. CALTRANS is insisting that this parking be eliminated. The City Council is supporting the chamber's attempt to change this order from CALTRANS. Please assist us by filling out this form. It would be appreciated if you could also send a letter. See the attached instructions. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: ( Check one ) Yes Comments 3-91 No No Position Date lio ro k E4ER Mas A Name of Business 2-575 PAC/F« (i, 14wy A Signature We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 22, 7:30 P.M., so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Th.nk you, Wesley 1i . Bush Executi e Vice Pres. Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 YOUR HELP IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on eliminating the PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on P.C.H., so this could on you. the matter of COAST HIGHWAY. have an affect CALTRANS is insisting that this parking be eliminated. The City Council is supporting the chamber's attempt to change this order from CALTRANS. Please assist us by filling out this form. It would be appreciated if you could also send a letter. See the attached instructions. - My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: ( Check one ) No No Position Date A e_ • Name of Business 2/ 7 /v. c r. C/f'4( Addys Signature Yes Comments We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 22, 7:30 P.M., so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. Th.nk you, Wesley1i. Bush Executi e Vice Pres. Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 404 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 YOUR HELP IS NEEDED The City Council is holding a public hearing on the matter of eliminating the PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. That would be the southbound lanes. Your business is located on P.C.H., so this could have an affect on you. CALTRANS is insisting that this parking be eliminated. The City Council is supporting the chamber's attempt to change this order from CALTRANS. Please assist us by filling out this form. It would be appreciated if you could also send a letter. See the attached instructions. My position on eliminating the parking on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway is: ( Check one ) Yes No No Position Date Comments: Name of Business V. 0 _. I--4, r .�,----- We need the information for the Council meeting on Tuesday, January 22, 7:30 P.M., so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated. L c\ Q CJ-\ dre..s s Signature Th.nk you, Wesley1i. Bush Executi e Vice Pres. AISAUTO INSURANCE SPECIALISTS INCORPORATED 2447 Pacific Coast Hwy., Hermosa 'Beach CA 90254-2737 (213)379-9999 Fax 2/3 372-2661 HOMEOWNERS • FIRE • COMMERCIAL • BOATS • MOTORCYCLES LIFE January 16, 1991 Assemblyman Richard Katz, Chairman Assembly Committee on Transportation State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: Eliminating Parking on Pacific Coast Highway Southbound Curb Lane, Hermosa Beach Dear Assemblyman Katz: We are the owner/occupants of 2447 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach. If there is no parking on Pacific Coast Highway, I assume there will be no stopping either. How are cars expected to drop off employees and customers at this building if they can't stop or park? Unfortunately, parking facilities available beneath the building increase the difficulty in dropping off employees or customers at our building. Also, the higher the potential speed on P.C.H., the greater the danger. We have already had one death and several injuries involving people attempting to pull out of 24th Place onto Pacific Coast Highway. I, and quite a few others, travel South on Pacific Coast Highway both on the wayto work and after work and there is no discernable degree of difficulty in either. Yours truly, James F. Caird President cc: California Dept. of Transportation Hermosa Beach City Council Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce. AUTO INSURANCE SPECIALISTS — LONG BEACH, INC. 2865 Tempk Ave. Long Beach. CA 90816 (213) 595-/995 FAX 0/3) 595.7690 AUTO INSURANCE SPECIALISTS — SANTA MONICA, INC. 2121 CIurerfield Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 9040.1 (2131829-4i21 FAX (2 131828.230! AUTO INSURANCE SPECIALISTS — INLAND EMPIRE, INC. 2155 Chicano Ave. Riverside, CA 92507 (7141 782.81(9, FAX (714) 782.8 20 AUTO INSURANCE SPECIALISTS — • VALLEY, INC. 20501 Ventura Blvd., N160 Woodland Hill,. CA 91304 (818170.-7771 FAX (8181 703.7858 AUTO INSURANCE SPECIALISTS — NEWPORT INC. 2802 Alum Avenue PO 8 . /4602 Gook. C.4 927/3.9602 (7145660.7101 January 17, 1991 Hermosa Beach City Council Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: _RECEIVED JAN 2 2 1991, CITY MGR. OFFICE The El Segundo Chamber of Commerce supports the recent decision by Caltrans to impose PM Peakhour parking restriction on State Highway 1 (Pacific Coast Highway) in Hermosa Beach. The Chamber of Commerce recognizes this as just one facet of the solution to the overall transportation crisis facing Los Angeles County. Implementation of this parking ban will relieve congestion and bottleneck conditions which are felt by all communities located along Pacific Coast Highway. In addition it will eliminate the danger caused by drivers swerving around cars parked along the highway during peak commute hours. Commuters will now have reason to stay on Pacific Coast Highway, rather than seeking alternate routes through local residential neighborhoods. This action is of regional illiportance, and will benefit the existing transportation network. Sincerely, The Officers and Directors of The El Segundo Chamber of Commerce cc: Jerry Baxter, Caltrans 5 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION EL SEGUNDO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE • 427 MAIN STREET • P.O. BOX 545 • EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA 90245 • (213) 322-1220 •'• (213) 772-1890 11 BEACH CITIES CYCLE _ 219 PACIFIC COAST HWY., HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 (213) 318-6030 Hermosa Beach City Council Civic Center Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 9 Sirs: As you know Hermosa not need a CALTRANS main business area. Pacific Coast Hwy., 1-12-91 RECEIVED JAN 2 2 1991 CITY MGR. OFFICE Beach is a very small town. It does expressway through the center of the Increasing the speed of traffic 0.11 is the last thing we need. Besides the danger involved with the extra lane, it would definitely hurt our businesses. Business needs help these days, CALTRANS will cause a negative effect with all the small businesses which do rely on the street parking in the evenings. Carl Pedersen, Owner. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION acer Hermosa Beach City Council Civic Center Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254.. Sirs: As you know Hermosa not need a CALTRANS main business area. Pacific Coast Hwy., Besides the danger definitely hurt our days, 'CALTRANS will small businesses wh the evenings. Dar0 1-12-91 RECEIVED JAN 221991 CITY MGR• OFFICE Beach is a very small town. It does .expressway through the center of the Increasing the speed of traffic on is the last thing we need. involved with the .extra lane, it would businesses. Business needs help these cause a negative effect with all the ich do rely on the street parking in Carl Pedersen, Owner SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 217 Pacific Coast Hwy. Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 • Ph.(213) 372-8244 January 9, 1991 City of 2lermosa i3eacL' Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Mr. R. Dave Gilstrap Senior Transportation Engineer Department of Transportation Caltrans District 7 120 So. Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Subject: Proposal to Remove the Parking Along the West Side of Pacific Coast Highway (Route 1) During Peak Hours Dear Dave: On January 8, 1991 the, Hermosa Beach City Council set 8:00 P.M., January 22, 1991 as the time and date for a public hearing to be held at City. Hall 1315 Valley Drive, to receive input and discuss the proposal to remove the parking along the west side of Pacific Coast Highway (Route 1) during P.M. peak hours. Below are the questions and concerns expressed by. the City Council members. In some cases I have paraphrased or interpreted their comments. Please be prepared to respond to each of the questions as it is Mayor Chuck Sheldon's intent to allow Caltrans time to respond to these questions, in order, at the start of the hearing. As I am sure you are aware, it is in the best interest of the proposal to be as prepared as possible. It was also requested by the mayor that responses be as precise as possible thereby providing a clear understanding and preventing any possible confusion. 1. Recently the State installed a traffic signal synchronization project on Route 1 between Manhattan Beach Blvd. in Manhattan Beach and Pier Ave. in Hermosa Beach. It is our understanding that this project is not interconnected with the signals north of Manhattan Beach Blvd. Why won't the signal synchronization assist in the flow of traffic? 2. Please provide historical data, for as many years as possible, comparing the southbound accident rates in Hermosa Beach to the southbound accident rates in Manhattan Beach during the P.M. peak between 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. so as to validate the contention that parking prohibitions are safer. 3. There are A.M. peak hour parking restrictions along the east side of Pacific Coast Highway in Hermosa Beach. Please provide the comparison data showing the conditions before the parking prohibitions and the conditions after the parking prohibitions. 4. If the parking is removed along the west side of Pacific Coast Highway:' a. Does Caltrans have data on traffic that passes through the city on alternate traffic routes? How much of a reduction of traffic volumes along other or alternate north -south Hermosa Beach streets is expected by the State? b. What is the current accident rate and what is the expected accident rate six months after implementation. c. What is the current time required to travel through Hermosa Beach along PCH during the P.M. peak and what is the expected time of travel six months after implementation? Please provide details on how such a time study would be conducted, i.e. starting/ending location, which travel lane, what time of day etc. d. Quantitatively, what benefits does Caltrans expect from removal of parking on PCH? Precisely what improvement in the accident rate does Caltrans expect, or what increase in the flow rate of automobiles through Hermosa Beach, or what measurable advantage in any respect does Caltrans expect? 5. a. Is the reason for the parking prohibition to increase street capacity or to improve safety? b. Which is more critical? 6. There have been statements made that most of the traffic on Pacific Coast Highway during the P.M. peak is from the El Segundo employment area. a. What has Caltrans done to promote carpooling, especially in the El Segundo area and with ESEA? b. Why are the employers in the El Segundo area not providing and encouraging more busses and carpooling? C. What has Caltrans done to promote more bus routes and parking lots for commuters? 7. There is a concern that a traffic bottle neck would be created at Pacific Coast Highway and 190th if the curb lane was opened to traffic. Please provide the assumptions and the documentation showing: a. that moving the bottleneck would be avoided and b. how many cars cutoff on Catalina? 8. Please address the issue that westbound Aviation traffic to southbound Pacific Coast Highway traffic adds to the traffic volumes along Pacific Coast Highway. Since traffic volumes north and south of Aviation are different should not the north and south segments of Pacific Coast highway be treated differently? 9. What is the State's long term plan for Pacific Coast Highway and the South Bay? Does Caltrans have a five, ten, or twenty year plan? a. Has Caltrans considered that employment in the El Segundo. area is dropping? b. Has Caltrans considered: c. that vehicles in the curb lane pose a potential greater danger to pedestrians because the curb lane width will be less than standard and the sidewalks are only five feet wide in some areas. The concern is heightened because in Manhattan Beach the curb lane tends to be the passing lane and the fast lane. d. Manhattan Beach has a wider right of way than Hermosa Beach and can better accommodate a third travel lane. Manhattan Beach has 20' sidewalks and Hermosa Beach has much narrower sidewalks with zero set backs on the commercial buildings and the sight distance for side street vehicles would be further restricted because the parking lane currently provides some sight distance. e. Please provide the plans for the future widening of PCH from Harbor Freeway to Los Angeles International Airport. f. If the parking restriction is implemented will Caltrans add dual left turns from westbound Artesia to southbound PCH? If so, please provide a sketch of the lane striping on Artesia. g. Will Caltrans correct the unusual jog in the lane stripings on southbound PCH at Pier Avenue? 10. What are Caltrans' long term plans for the South Bay, PCH in particular? Are these plans in the form of some planning document? How frequently do these plans change? What opportunity do cities and the public have to give input to these plans? 11. At some point a decision was made by Caltrans to initiate the process of having parking removed on PCH in Hermosa Beach. Describe how this decision was made, e.g. what was the impetus, what alternatives were explored, what research was done, who was consulted, who ultimately made this decision, and when? To make sure there is no confusion, I am interested in what happened before any correspondence between Caltrans and Hermosa began on this issue. 12. How were the quantitative estimates to the above question computed? What was the source of data used in these computations? 13. Does Caltrans expect intangible benefits that cannot be measured? What are these? 14. If Caltrans' expectations of the benefits of P.M. parking removal are not met, does Caltrans intend to restore P.M. parking? How long a test period does Caltrans feel would be necessary? 15. Has an Environmental Impact Review (EIR) been done, or even considered? Was aneconomic analysis included? 16. What efforts has Caltrans made to reduce traffic, in particular the single car commuting traffic on PCH? Please list the past and current projects, the amount of money spent, and the effects of these projects which are specifically designed to reduce traffic on PCH. In addition, please indicate Caltrans' long term plans and expectations for commuter traffic reduction in the South Bay. 17. Has Caltrans considered that the curb lane be limited to High Occupancy Vehicles (HOV) and emergency vehicles only? Has a reversible lane been considered as an alternative? Other questions or requests previously asked but not yet responded: 18. What other alternatives were examined? (Previously asked December 31, 90.) 19. Where is the response letter? (Previously asked I thought this list would hope there is enough time January 22, 91. If I may letter to the City's October 22, 90 December 31, 90.) be shorter, but apparently not. I to adequately prepare for provide assistance, please call me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. ly, An ny Antich Director of Public Works ti cc: City Council AA8 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council of Hermosa Beach February 4, 1991 Regular Meeting of February 12, 1991 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 1990-91 Recommendatiin: It is recommended that the City Council approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers and designa- tions as presented in the "City of Hermosa Beach Budget Summary 1990-91 Midyear Review", attached as Exhibit A. Background: The City has conducted a Midyear Budget Review annually since fis- cal year 1981-82. The review is a good tool to ensure that assump- tions and estimates originally used to prepare the budget ten months earlier remain realistic. The City Council also has an op- portunity to review new fund balance estimates for year end 1991 which include actual balances left from the prior year instead of estimates used in budget preparation. All actions taken by Council in the first six months of the year that affected revenue, ap- propriations, transfers and fund balances are incorporated in the Budget Summary. Analysis: The analysis will focus on the General Fund since it is the main operating fund of the City and is essentially unrestricted in use. The downturn in the economy, combined with the loss of the AMC dealership and the reduction in property tax due to SB2557 results in a 2% reduction in revenue, which is less than some other cities are experiencing. (see attached article L.A. Times 2/4/91) As the Council knows from the presentation of the financial state- ments for last fiscal year, the General Fund fund balance was high- er than estimated in the budget by almost $333,000, primarily due to lower expenditures or projects carrying forward into this fiscal year. The recommended midyear revisions result in a reduction in revenue matched by a net reduction in appropriations, with no use of the prior year carryover to replace anticipated lower revenues. This "matching" of revenue and appropriations was accomplished through two rounds of departmental revisions. After realizing revenue would be down substantially, departments were asked to identify reductions that could be made to their departmental budget or re- vise revenue estimates that may have been too conservative. An overview of the General Fund midyear revisions is: Revenue Appropriations Additions $22,750 Reductions 104,037 $80,607 - $ 81,287 The overall effect is that appropriations were reduced by $680 more than revenue. 1 6 Revenue General Fund estimated revenue is projected to decrease by $80,607 as shown on Exhibit B, Revenue Worksheet. The largest reduction is in sales tax (9%). The original budget projected 5% growth, assumed an increased level of activity at the Pavilion and included the new Volkswagen dealership. Instead, there is no growth in sales tax; in fact the first half is 4% down from last year with continuation of at least a flat sales tax expected in the current economy. The Pavilion is no closer to full occupancy than last year and, as the Council is aware, the .AMC dealer left town in September. The property is still vacant. Property tax in the General Fund would be higher by almost $72,000 if the State had not passed SB2557. The bill allows L.A. County to begin charging for property tax administration and the County has done so by reducing the amount of tax Hermosa Beach will receive. The League of California Cities is working on a solution, but there is no reason to be optimistic at this time. The bill also allowed the County to implement new booking fees, but the method used by the Sheriff to implement the fees will have minimal effect on Hermosa Beach. Interest estimates are projected to increase by $150,000 overall for several reasons: 1) fund balances are higher than originally anticipated 2) decline in rates less severe than anticipated 3) upward aberration in the investment marketplace. When the school property acquisition is complete and planned large sewer project expenditures are made, interest earnings will be affected since the portfolio size will decrease substantially. All increased and decreased fees resulting from the User Fee Study are incorporated. The net impact for the second half of the year is +$39,333. Activity levels, particularly in building related fees, are down due to the economy, therefore the overall impact of the User Fee Study is less than otherwise would have been expected. Appropriations Exhibit C shows the original department appropriation revision requests of $143,734 with City Manager recommendations which increase appropriations by $22,750 from the General Fund. When the amount of the revenue decrease was finalized, departments were asked to identify reductions that could be made in their department budgets. This second round of appropriation revisions totals $104,037 and is shown on Exhibit D. Since the state of the economy and sales tax revenue in particular is unstable at this time, a reduction in appropriations to match the reduction in revenue was preferred over just making up the shortfall from reserves or the excess funds from prior year. Any reduction now, of course, decreases the funds left at year end to meet the budgeted 2.5% savings. However, year end savings have exceeded 2.5% for several years, with 89-90 over 5%, so the likelihood is slight. Transfers The appropriations shown on Exhibit C, for the Capital Improvement Fund require a transfer from the Park Recreation Facility Tax Fund since that is the funding source. The reduction in Sanitary Sewer Improvements, Target Area 4, CIP 88-406 also requires a reduction in the transfer to the Capital Improvement Fund. Fund Balance/Designations The new fund balance projection for the end of 1990-91 is $2,018,433. The following amounts are designated currently: Asset Replacement $120,000 Capital Improvements 18,907 Contingency 469,159 Due to Contingency from Asset Forfeiture 190,000 Affordable Housing 111,831 School Property Acq. 700,000 Since there were surplus funds from the previous year, it is recom- mended that those funds be placed in the Capital Improvement Con- tingency which was reduced to a very low level by the citywide sidewalk repair program. The new Capital Improvement balance would be $427,443, resulting in the entire balance of the General Fund being designated for some purpose. The City Council may, of course,' change these designations (except Affordable Housing) at any time. Conclusion The immediate shortfall in revenue has been offset by reductions in approved spending. The City has a reasonable reserve for contin- gencies of approximately 7% of appropriations in the General Fund. With a more serious downturn in the economy and a lack of replace- ment in sales tax for lost businesses, reserves could diminish very quickly. Itis imperative that the City keep a close watch on revenues and the economy in the event that further adjustments are necessary. The next six month review of the budget will take place in August, when adjustments to the 1991-92 budget would be recommended. At that time, six more months of activity will have taken place and preliminary year end numbers will be available for 1990-91. An earlier review could be recommended, however, if the economy demands. evin B. North aft City Manager Viki Copeland Finance Director Recession -Bred Budget Woes RunRampant in Cities By DEAN E. MURPHY TIMES STAFF WRITER Lesaie Alina Tarver was two weeks shy of her six-month probationary period as an office clerk for the city of Carson when she was called into her boss' office. ' The news was not good. Sales taxes, which pay about half of the city's bilis, were running $600,000 short of projections. More than a dozen of the city's 340 employees had to go. "There was no reaction but to sit there and listen," said Tarver, who lives in Carson with her retired husband. "We had heard rumors for some time, but still it was a surprise." rr he layoffs just before Thanksgiving were followed by a I citywide hiring freeze and increases in city fees. The price of business licenses went up 40%. For the first time, the city began charging teen-agers to play flag football and other city sports. The belt -tightening in Carson. a working-class commu- nity in the back lot of the Port of Los Angeles. reflects a growing unease in city halls across Los Angeles County as the region's teetering economy slips deeper into recession. Municipal budgets from Pomona to the Palos' Verdes Peninsula were drawn upl.last _spring while the economy still looked healthy and conauiners were not skittfah'about spending. Suddenly, that has all changed. Pessimistic city managers and financial officers are now preparing local governments for the worst. "We talk about it just about every day," said Nelson E. Oliva; assistant city administrator in Hawaiian Gardens, a small, financially troubled city in the county's southeast corner. "We know what side our bread is buttered on." Even in Beverly Hills, one ofthe moat affluent cities in the nation, worries about the recession have led to predictions of a budget shortfall and talk of a new .tax on utility users. "The big question is how low revenues will dip," said Don Oblander, Beverly Hills director of finance. "At this point, we just don't know." Since Proposition 13 halted the growth in property tax revenues to cities statewide more than a decade ago, local governments have become increasingly dependent on other income—particularly sales taxes—to pay for city services. If Christmas holiday retail sales fell sharply and the economy remains •In decline. as financial experts B6 MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1991 * predict, many c(ties expect to find thernselves scrambling to make ends meet when the fiscal year ends in June. "I don't see where we could cut back," said Leonard Locher, city manager of Maywood, which relies on sales taxes for about 25% of its income. "Our budget is as spare as it can be. It's like a household budget: (Money( comes in one week, and it's out the next." Lastspring. Mayor Tom Bradley warned that Los Angeles was on "a fiscal tightrope" even before the national and local economies ,dipped Into recession. Los Angeles budgeters now predict' at least a S20 -million shortfall for the current fiscal year, with deficit projections for the 1991-92 fiscal year approaching $180 million. Bradley ordered a hiring freeze late last year, sparing only a small number of police recruits. Indefinite holds have been placed on the purchase of new street graders and sweepers, the city's 41 seasonal swimming pools were closed three weeks early, and the city has even shut some public restrooms because of depleted cleaning staffs. "The public has not seen a serious diminution of services, but another year like this and it will be painfully apparent Please see BUDGETS, 136 J 1.OS ANGELES TIMES METRO NEWS BUDGETS: Recession Worrying Municipal Officials Conllnued from 131 said Loa Angeles City Counfsllman Zev Yaroslavaky. chairman of the City Council's Budget and Finance Committee. Budget officials In Long Beach, the county's sscond largest city, predict thataoc l sales tax collec- tions may fall' 6%—or about 92 million—this fiscal year, while a construction slowdown may cost • the city an additional 91 million in building and planning fees. City Manager James Hankla has re- sponded by asking departments to cut spending by 5%. As a result, the Long Beach Public Library is buying fewer books and has cut back on part- time help. The parks department has delayed purchases of grass seed and fertilizer. Even Long Beach budget. manager Bob Torres has pitched in,;SPealding part of his New Year's week . d moving com- puters in. his office to avoid paying a city maintenance crew overtime. "It's always been a real tight budget." Torrez said. "The real difficulty Is that the state and -county are havingsevere problems and they're coming down to us.- , The news;is much the same in the once -booming towns at the far stretches of the county. A drastic turnabout in the housing market in Palmdale and Lancaster in the Antelope Valley, one of the fast- est-growing areas of the state during the 1980s, has led to a frantic recalculation of revenues generated by the local building industry. palmdale had expected to collect $8 million this fiscal year from development fees, but officials now project a $4 -million shortfall. The city has kept 15 to 20 jobs vacant and has cut or deferred non-essen- tial expenses, including a library remodeling. auditorium rehabilita- tion and new City Hall phone system. 'The real question is going to be what the economy is going to do in 1992,' said Bill Ramsey, Palmdale's finance director.. "If we have a second year like this, it's going to hurt." The economic slowdown has not required significant cuts in essen- tial city services like police and fire protection, but law enforcement has not been spared entirely. Pasa- dena police saved 9100,000 by tritmilng patrols during New Year'$ Eve and the Tournament of Rosea Parade, while plans to en- large the Los Angeles Police De- partment have gone by the way- side. Los Angeles police also say they have no money to upgrade the city's woefully inadequate 911 emergency system. An estimated 100,000 calls to 911 went unan- swered last year, police officials said, as did nearly a million non- emergency calls because of an outmoded communications system. Voters recently defeated a ballot measure seeking $235 million in bonds to upgrade the system, but city officials will try again on the April ballot. The looming economic crisis may get even gloomier for local governments because the state and county are expected to pass more expenses along to cities as money gets tight everywhere. Long Beach, for example, recently re- ceived a $1.5 -million bill from Los Angeles County, the result of a new state law that allows counties to charge municipalities for col- lecting local property taxes. County officials say they need the money to pay for health, welfarr and criminal justice pro- grams 'they. provide to residents countjwide. The county relies heavily on vehicle license fees for income, but those revenues have dropped dramatically as fewer res- idents buy expensive new cars. Direct funding from the state for a variety of programs le also In jeopardy because of budget prob- lems in Sacramento. The recession "has had the dou- ble whammy effect, where reve- nues are anticipated to decline .. . [and] the welfare caseload fs rising as the unemployment problem in- creases," said Gerald A. Rooa, the county's senior assistant adminis- trative officer. The deteriorating state economy plunged the county's mental health system into Its worst financial crisis in memory when former Gov. George Deukmejian slashed 471 million in state funding for mental health last year. Without addition- al money, about 27,000 of the county's 58.000 mental health pa- tients faced dismissal from treat- ment. The County Board of Supervi- sors responded by using taxing authority over unincorporated ar- eas recently bestowed upon it by the Legislature. The supervisors recently voted a bailout plan that included a 5% tax on users of gas, electric and telephone utilities. an increase In the hotel and motel occupancy tax, and new taxes on landfills and amusement parks. The board also squeezed an addi- tional $4 million in savings through cuts imposed on other county de- partments. The bailout averted a massive dismissal of mental health patients and a feared Increase in "hostage situations, barricade situations, suicides and suicide attempts," in the words of Assistant Sheriff J. L. Harper. But it will be a short-lived victory if the state economy con- tinues to deteriorate, leaving even less money for counties in fiscal 1991-92. It is such uncertainty about the coming fiscal year that has local governments across the county second-guessing every dollar they spend. "The furniture looks real bad, but I'm not going to (buy new furniture] because we have more important things to do," said Po- mona City Administrator Julio Fu- entes, whose city faces a $2 -million deficit. "We're trying to get as much bang for the buck as we can." Contributing to this story were Times staff writers Bettina Boxall, John Chandler, Irene Chang, Jane Fritsch, Michela Fustsch, Kenneth J. Garcia, Tina Gdego, Anthony Mlillcen. Richard Simon and Irene Wlelawskl. MIDYEAR REVISIONS GENERAL LIGHTING PARKING STATE GAS COUNTY GAS PARK REC FUND FUND FUND TAX FUND TAX FUND FAC TAX FUND ESTIMATED REVENUE 001 105 110 115 120 125 Taxes $6,271,278 $184,637 $0 $0 SO 57,000 Licenses/Permits 5290,837 $0 $0 $0 SO SO Fines/Forfeitures 5195,000 $0 S1,300,000 SO $0 SO Use of Money/Property 5483,205 595,934 527,370 5193,753 51,973 5102,850 Intergovernmental/State 5895,006 $0 $0 5330,439 SO $0 Intergovernmental/County SO 50 SO SO SO SO Intergovernmental/Federal $0 SO $0 $0 $0 SO Current Service Charges 5424,421 $0 5948,504 $0 $0 SO Other Revenue 586,045 $0 $0 50 SO 5130,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 58,645,792 S280,571 52,275,874 5524,192 51,973 5239,850 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 51,601,034 $0 SO 55,000 55,938 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE • 510,246,826 5280,571 52,275,874 5529,192 57,911 5239,850 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/90 52,460,406 51,454,628 51,838,848 51,044,221 534,333 52,106,303 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 512,707,232 51,735,199 54,114,722 51,573,413 542,244 52,346,153 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget 59,335,818 5314,975 5869,614 $0 SO 50 Capital Outlay 5503,369 $0 545,850 $0 SO $0 Capital Improvements $0 SO 50 SO $0 50 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 59,839,187 5314,975 5915,464 50 $0 $0 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 5849,612 530,698 51,360,401 51,280,969 534,841 5520,985 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFER OUT $10,688,799 $345,673 $2,275,865 $1,280,969 $34,841 $520,985 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE , $2,018,433 * $1,389,526 51,838,857 ** 5292,444 *** 57,403 $1,825,168 **** 6/30/91 *DESIGNATED FOR: ASSET REPLACEMENT S120,000 **RETID EARNINGS ***RESERVED: ****DESIGNATED FOR: CAP IMPROVEMENTS $18,907 RES'D AND FIXED BIKE PATH $43,060 PROSPECT PK ACO CONTINGENCY 5469,159 ASSETS STRAND WALKWAY 5550,000 DUE FROM ASSET/FOR FD 5190,000 5463,585 LOT PROCEEDS AFFORD HSG 5111,831 51,056,506 EXHTBTT A ESTIMATED REVENUE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1990-91 MIDYEAR REVISIONS UUT RR RIGHT 6%UUT CDBG PROP A. GRANT OF WAY FUND FUND FUND FUND 'FUND 126 127 140 145 150 Taxes 5863,766 $1,295,658 $0 $196,000 SO Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0 SO Use of Money/Property $40,077 58,020 $0 524,502 SO Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,500 Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 SO SO Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $12,984 $0 $0 Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 $14,500 $0 Other Revenue $0 $0 (54,696) $0 SO TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $903,843 $1,303,678 $8,288 $235,002 540,500 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0' $0 $0 $0 $0 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $903,843 S1,303,678 $8,288 $235,002 $40,500 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/90 $673,864 $38,286 $4,698 $329,214 $302,807 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $1,577,707 $1,341,964 $12,986 $564,216 $343,307 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget $3,200 50 $12,984 5240,457 0 Capital Outlay $617,255 $0 $0 $0 0 Capital Improvements $0 SO $0 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $620,455" SO $12,984 $240,457 $0 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFER OUT ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/91 $0 $1,304,342 $0 $12,015 $125,894 $620,455 $1,304,342 S12,984 $252,472 $125,894 $957,252 * $37,622 52 $311,744 $217,413 *DESIGNATION FOR: OPEN SPACE $200,000 ATSF PURCHASE $292,734 (SEAVIEW PROCEEDS) ESTIMATED REVENUE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY 1990-91 MIDYEAR REVISIONS CR GRD SEWER ASSET FORF FIRE CAP PROJECTS INSURANCE VEHICLE FUND FUND FUND PROTECTION FUND FUND PARKING 155 160 170 180 305 705 DISTRICT TOTAL Taxes $58,953 E0 E0 $0 , E0 E0 E0 58,877,292 Licenses/Permits 50 50 E0 50 50 50 50 5290,837 Fines/Forfeitures $0 SO 5452,000 50 SO 50 $0 51,947,000 Use of Money/Property 52,891 5109,480 58,158 521,598 50 50 5120,365 51,240,176 . Intergovernmental/State 50 SO $0 $0 50 50 SO 51,265,945 Intergovernmental/County SO 54,000 50 SO SO $0 SO 54,000 Intergovernmental/Federal $0 S0 $0 SO S0' $0 SO 512,984 Current Service Charges 50 512,745 50 . 50 50 SO 540,756 51,440,926 Other Revenue 50 50 59,000 5156,000 SO 52,033 50 5378,382 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 561,844 5126,225 5469,158 5177,598 50 52,033 5161,121 515,457,542 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 50 5800,000 50 50 54,135,826 5797,279 50 57,345,077 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE 561,844 5926,225 5469,158 5177,598 54,135,826 5799,312 5161,121 522,802,619 ACTUAL FUND BALANCE 7/1/90 '562,209 51,988,809 (5128,855) 5290,344 50 5243,968 50 512,744,083 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE, 5124,053 52,915,034 5340,303 5467,942 54,135,826 51,043,280 5161,121 535,546,702 APPROPRIATIONS Operating Budget 558,512 5144,972 5297,226 5100,000 SO 5882,279 571,289 50 Capital Outlay $0 $91,870 $29,330 50 SO SO $0 S1,287,674 Capital Improvements - SO $0 SO $0 $4,135,826 SO SO $4,135,826 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $58,512 $236,842 $326,556 $100,000 54,135,826 5882,279 _ $71,289. $17,754,826 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $2,805 S1,792,309 $13,496 50 SO $O $16,710 $7,345,077 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFER OUT 561,317 $2,029,151 $340,052 $100,000 $4,135,826 5882,279 $87,999 $25,099,903 ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 562,736 5885,883 , $251 $367,942 SO S161,001 S73,122 $10,446,799 6/30/91 GENERAL FUND 3101 3102 3103 3106 3107 3108 0() 3110 3111 3112 3113 3114 3115 3202 3203 3204 3205 3206 3207 3209 3211 3212 3213 Taxes Current Year Secured Current Year Unsecured Prior Year Collections Supplemental Roll SB813 Transfer Tax Sales Tax Cable TV Franchise Electric Franchise Gas Franchise Refuse Franchise Transient Occupancy Business License Licenses and Permits Dog Licenses Bicycle Licenses Building Permits Electric Permits Plumbing Permits Occupancy Permits Garage Sales Banner Permits Animal /Fowl Permits Animal Redemption Fee ESTIMATED REVENUE 12-31-90 $3,035,712.00 $207,756.00 $53,000.00 $80,000.00 $116,244.00 $1,929,824.00 $114,000.00 $39,882.00 $29,603.00 $147,000.00 $277,175.00 $425,000.00 $6,455,196.00 $17,107.00 $300.00 $170,000.00 $40,000.00 $32,000.00 $4,600.00 $80.00 $1,300.00 $800.00 $3,500.00 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1990-91 MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW REVENUE WORKSHEET MIDYEAR REVISION $3,058,008.00 $232,459.00 $53,000.00 $80,000.00 $84,000.00 $1,750,000.00 $121,000.00 $39,882.00 $29,603.00 $140,000.00 $248,326.00 $435,000.00 $6,271,278.00 $17,107.00 $300.00 $210,000.00 $25,000.00 $21,000.00 $7,925.00 $120.00 $1,660.00 $800.00 $3,500.00 INCREASE (DECREASE) $22,296.00 $24,703.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($32,244.00) ($179,824.00) $7,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($7,000.00) ($28,849.00) $10,000.00 EXHIBIT B ($183,918.00) $0.00 $0.00 $40,000.00 ($15,000.00) ($11,000.00) $3,325.00 $40.00 $360.00 $0.00 $0.00 JUSTIFICATION Note: Some accounts show a calculation consisting of the revenue received as of 12/31 + (no/units for next six months x new fee amount) for purposes of determining the user fee impact LEVY HIGHER THAN ANTICIPATED, BUT LOWER BY $72,000 DUE TO SB2557 HIGHER LEVY 1ST 1ST 1ST HALF HALF HALF DOWN 32% FROM 89-90, DOWN 4%, LOSS OF AMC UP, ANTICIPATED RATE FEWER PROPERTY TURNOVERS DEALER, PROJECT NO GROWTH INCREASE EFFECTIVE MARCH'91 RATES NOT ADJUSTED AS PREDICTED HOTEL HERMOSA OPENED LATER W/LWR RATES, HOTEL INDUSTRY DOWN BASED ON PRIOR YEAR ACTUAL HOTEL PROJECT INCREASED REVENUE, BUT ACTIVITY LOWER OTHERWISE LESS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY LESS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY $3925+($40X 100)=$7925 INCREASED ENFORCEMENT $550+($185X6)=$1660 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 3216 Spray Booth Permit 3217 Open Fire Permit 3218 Auto Repair Permit 3221 Beach Volleyball App Fines & Forfeitures 3301 Vehicle Code Violations 3303 Court Fines/Police Dept 3401 3402 3403 3404 3405 3406 3411 3412 3418 Use of Money & Property Interest Income Rents & Concessions Pier Revenue Comm Ctr Leases Comm Ctr Rentals Comm Ctr Theatre Other Facilities Tennis Courts Special Events Intergovernmental/State 3504 In Lieu Off Highway 3505 In Lieu Motor Vehicle 3507 Highway Maintenance 3508 Mandated Costs 3509 Homeowner Prop Tx Relief 3510 Post $540.00 $1,700.00 $1,160.00 $0.00 $450.00 $450.00 $0.00 $75.00 $75.00 $0.00 $430.00 $430.00 $0.00 $570.00 $570.00 $0.00 $200.00 $200.00 $270,227.00 $290,837.00 $20,610.00 $115,000.00 $135,000.00 $20,000.00 $51,000.00 $60,000.00 $9,000.00 $166,000.00 $195,000.00 $29,000.00 ESTIMATED MIDYEAR INCREASE REVENUE REVISION (DECREASE) 12-31-90 $194,701.00 $2,000.00 $10,700.00 $84,000.00 $52,000.00 $38,000.00 $24,000.00 $12,000.00 $38,000.00 $455,401..00 $333.00 $734,614.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $65,000.00 $42,000.00 $228,505.00 $3,000.00 $10,700.00 $87,000.00 $52,000.00 $28,000.00 $24,000.00 $12,000.00 $38,000.00 $483,205.00 $333.00 $734,614.00 $3,850.00 $3,502.00 $65,000.00 $42,000.00 $33,804.00 $1,000.00 $0.00. $3,000.00 $0.00 ($10,000.00) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $27,804.00 $0.00 $0.00 $850.00 $3,502.00 $0.00' $0.00 $790+($35X26)=$1700 0+($30 X 15)=$450. NEW FEE ($15X 5 UNITS) NEW FEE($43X 10 UNITS) 'NEW FEE ($57X 10 UNITS) ASSUME ONE APPLICANT COLLECTIONS HIGHER FIRST HALF INCREASED VOLUME OF ACTIVITY, CITY PROSECUTOR JUSTIFICATION HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATER OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED ADDT'L PHONES, MORE COMMISSION ADDT'L LEASE --BEACH CITIES COALTN SUMMER RENTALS LOWER THAN PROJECTED $1294.06+(34HRS X 2 X$37.63) REFLECTS REIMBURSEMENT REC'D 3511 Stc-Svc Off Training 3514 Cigarette Tax $8,500.00 $37,207.00 $890,654.00 Current Service Charges 3801" Residential Inspection $9,000.00 3802 Sign Review $1,000.00 3803 Environmental Impact $6,075.00 3805 Condt'l Use Permit Amend $0.00 3806 Board of Appeals $300.00 3808 Zone Variance Review $1,920.00 3809 Tentative Map Subdivision $5,850.00 3810 Final Map Review $2,250.00 3811 Zone Chg/Gen plan Amend $2,700.00 3812 Conditional Use Review $23,250.00 3813 Plan Check Fees $105,000.00 3814 Planning/Zoning Appeal $2,132.00 3815 Public Works Services $10,000.00 3817 Special Curb Marking $300.00 3818 Police Services $17,000.00 3819 Jail Services $10,200.00 3820 Trusty Admin Fee $200.00 3821 Fingerprint Service $2,500.00 3823 Special Event Security $45,000.00 3824 Vehicle Inspection Fees $3,000.00 3825 Public Notice Posting $80.00 3826 Rec Programs/Classes $41,800.00 3827 Library Grounds Maint $4,788.00 Current Service Charges 3831 Street Cut Inspection 3834 Encroachment Permit $8,500.00 $37,207.00 $895,006.00 $0.00 50.00 $4,352.00 $8,000.00 ($1,000.00) $2,650.00 $1,650.00 $8,100.00 $2,025.00 $5,120.00 $5,120.00 $300.00 $0.00 $3,130.00 $1,210.00 $2,025.00 ($3,825.00) $3,550.00 $1,300:00 $1,650.00 (31,050.00) $19,487.00 ($3,763.00) $130,000.00 $25,000.00 $2,132.00 $0.00 $12,000.00 $2,000.00 $300.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 $3,000.00 $10,200.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $1,300.00 $2,000.00 ($500.00) $27,000.00 ($18,000.00) $1,600.00 ($1,400.00) $80.00 $0.00 $41,800.00 $0.00 $4,788.00 $0.00 ESTIMATED MIDYEAR INCREASE REVENUE REVISION (DECREASE) 12-31-90 $15,000.00 $17,600.00. $18,000.00 $17,600.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 FEWER HOME SALES $650+(80X$25)=52650. FEE INCREASE --$5150+($295 X 10)=$8100 PREVIOUSLY ACCT #3812--$320X16=$5120 FEE INCREASE -$1280+(2X$925)=$3130 ONLY 1 SUBDIVSN IN PST 3 YRS($2025X1) FEE INCREASE -$1750+($225 X 8)=$3550 FEE INCREASE BUT LESS PROJCTS THN EXPECTED($450+$1200X1)=$1650 FEE INCREASE BUT LESS PROJECTS-$8987+(14X$600+14X$150)=$19487 HOTEL PROJECT INCREASED REVENUE, BUT ACTIVITY LOWER OTHERWISE INCREASE IN FEES RELATING TO MATERIALS, SERVICES 51% DECREASE IN CATEGORY FEES, BUT LARGE AMT COLLECTED 1ST 6 MOS MORE ACTIVITY THAN PROJECTED FEE REDUCED BY 50% LESS FILM ACTIVITY THAN PREVIOUS YEAR FEE ELIMINATED JUSTIFICATION $9764+(37 X$145)+(25 X$115)=$18,004 3836 Fumigation Inspect Fee 3837 Returned Check Charge 3838 Sale of Map/Publications 3839 Photocopy Charges 3840 Ambulance Transport 3841 Police Towing 3857 Parking Plan Application 3858 Tenant Refuse Billing 3859 Refuse Lien Fee 3861 Hazardous Matl Permit 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 3863 False Alarm Fee 3866 Nonconforming Remodels 3867 Precise DevlmntPlans 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft 3869 2nd Party Response 3870 Legal Determination Hearing 3871 Paramedic Resp/Non-Trspt 3872 Lock -Out (Car) 3873 Lock -Out (House) 3874 Flooding Water Removal 3875 Spray Booth Inspection 3876 Fire Protection/Sys Existg 3877 Sprinkler Cert Test 3878 Comml Bldg/Apt Insp 3883 Final/Tent Map Extension 3884 Lot Line Adjustment 3885. Permitted Use Request 3886 Text Amendment Private 3887 Voluntary Lot Merger 3888 Planning Comm Appeals 3890 300' Radius Notcg/Appl CC 3891 Zoning Appl to Ping Comm Other Revenue 3901 Sale of Real/Pers Property 3902 Refunds/Reimb Prey Yr 3903 Contributions Non Govt $7,500.00 $8,000.00 $500.00 $800.00 $800.00 $0.00 $800.00 $800.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $8,500.00 $10,000.00 $1,500.00 $26,500.00 $26,500.00 $0.00 $960.00 $1,840.00 $880.00 $200.00 $200.00 $0.00 $500.00 $610.00 $110.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 ($1,000.00) $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,200.00 $1,980.00 ($1,220.00) $320.00 $1,145.00 $825.00 $50,000.00 $15,950.00 ($34,050.00) $0.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 $600.00 $600.00 $0.00 $475.00 $475.00 $0.00 $435.00 $435.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 $105.00 $105.00 $0.00 $184.00 $184.00 $0.00 $350.00 $350.00 $0.00 $450.00 $450.00 $0.00 $515.00 $515.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $270.00 $270.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $430,225.00 $424,421.00 ($5,804.00) $8,000.00 $12,000.00 $4,000.00 $500.00 $23,728.00 $23,228.00 $5,000.00 $5,121.00 $121.00 ALTHOUGH FEE INCREASED, LESS PERMITS BEING ISSUED FEES INCREASED FEE INCREASE -$920 X 2=$1840 INCREASE IN DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS NEW FEE SCHED BUT PROCESS NOT IMPLEMENTED YET FEE INCREASED -$530+(30X$50)=$2030 $1100+($100X9) FEE INCREASE BUT LESS PROJECTS THAN EXPECTED FEE INCREASE -$1145 X 1= $1,145.00 NEW FEE EFF 1/91 INSTEAD OF 7/90--$319 X 50=$15,950 $994+($253X4) UNKNOWN IF ANY WILL OCCUR NEW FEE(20 UNITS X$75 NEW FEE(10 UNITS X $60) NEW FEE (5 UNITS X$95) NEW FEE (5 UNITS X$87) NEW FEE (4 UNITS X$300) NEW FEE (1 UNIT X$105) NEW FEE (2 UNITS X$92) NEW FEE (2 UNITS X$175) NEW FEE, $225 x 2=$450 NEW FEE; $515 X 1=$515 NEW FEE, HOWEVER ONLY A FEW PROJECTS WITHIN PAST 3 YRS NEW FEE, HOWEVER ONLY A FEW PROJECTS WITHIN PAST 3 YRS NEW FEE, HOWEVER ONLY A FEW PROJECTS WITHIN PAST 3 YRS NEW FEE, HOWEVER ONLY A FEW PROJECTS WITHIN PAST 3 YRS NEW FEE -EST 3 APPEALS 51$90=$270 UNKNOWN IF ANY WILL OCCUR ESTIMATE + 12/31/90 RECEIPTS THRU 12/31 RECEIPTS THRU 12/31 3904 General Miscellaneous 3908 Development Mitigation $5,196.00 $40,000.00 $58,696.00 FUND TOTAL $8,726,399.00 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 3103 Prior Year Collections Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income FUND TOTAL VEHICLE PARKING DIST Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3407 Parking Lot Rental 3409 V.P D Lot B 3413 V P D Lease $5,196.00 $40,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,045.00 $27,349.00 $8,645,792.00 ($80,607.00) ESTIMATED MIDYEAR INCREASE REVENUE REVISION (DECREASE) JUSTIFICATION 12-31-90 $296,124.00 $5,000.00 $179,637.00 $5,000.00 ($116,487.00) COUNCIL REDUCED ASSESSMENT $0.00 $301,124.00 $184,637.00 ($116,487.00) $74,525.00 $95,934.00 $21,409.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCES, HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED $375,649.00 $280,571.00 $0.00 $409.00 $14,966.00 $14,966.00 $22,990.00 $22,990.00 $66,084.00 $82,000.00 $104,040.00 ($95,078.00) ($95,078.00) $409.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED $0.00 $0.00 $15,916.00 ADJUSTMENT BASED ON PRIOR YEAR ACTUAL $120,365.00 $16,325.00 Current Service Charges 3845 VPD Lot Permits/Daily 3846 VPD Lot Permits/Monthly 3847 Validation Stamps FUND TOTAL PARKING FUND Fines & Forfeitures 3302 Court Fines/Parking Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3407 Parking Lot Rental 3842 3843 3844. 3848 3849 3850 Current Service Charges Parking Meters Parking Permits: Annual Daily Parking Permits Driveway Permits Guests Permits Contractor's Permits $7,771.00 $10,985.00 $22,000.00 $40,756.00 $144,796.00 $1,351,000.00 $15,510.00 $7,200.00 $22,710.00 $700,000.00 $185,000.00 $1,234.00 $1,032.00 $752.00 $720.00 $888,738.00 Other. Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reimb Prev Yr $0.00 50.00 FUND TOTAL $2,262,448.00 $7,771.00 $10,985.00 $22,000.00 $40,756.00 $161,121.00 $1,300,000.00 $20,170.00 $7,200.00 $27,370.00 $752,000.00 $191,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,032.00 $752.00 $1,720.00 $948,504.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $16,325.00 ($51,000.00) $4,660.00 $0.00 $4,660.00 $52,000.00 $6,000.00 $766.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $59,766.00 50.00 50.00 52,275,874.00 $13,426.00 REDUCTION BASED ON ACTUAL COLLECTIONS TO DATE/ASSUMING 2ND HALF EQUIVALENT TO 89-90, IODS, TURNOVER, NEW PARKING POLICIES RESULT IN FEWER CITATIONS HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED BASED ON PRIOR YEAR ACTUAL AND FIRST HALF COLLECTIONS BASED ON PRIOR YEAR ACTUAL LOT'F COLL & DAILY PKG PASSES -$1640+$360 CONTR PRMTS FALL OFF WINTER -$1420+(15X$20)=$1720 STATE GAS TAX FUND Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 3414 Funds Exchange Intergovernmental/State 3501 Section 2106 Allocation 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 3522 TDA Article 3 (SB821) FUND TOTAL COUNTY GAS TAX FUND ESTIMATED MIDYEAR INCREASE REVENUE REVISION (DECREASE) JUSTIFICATION 12-31-90 $19,360.00 $35,433.00 $16,073.00 $0.00 $158,320.00 $158,320.00 $19,360.00 $193,753.00 $174,393.00 $83,299.00 $83,299.00 $0.00 $174,268.00 $174,268.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $63,216.00 $63,216.00 $451,656.00 $5,656.00 ($446,000.00) $713,223.00 $330,439.00 ($382,784.00) $732,583.00 $524,192.00 ($208,391.00) HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED PER CITY COUNCIL ACTION 11/27/90, ALAMEDA TRANSP. AUTH. INCREASED GAS TAX EFFECTIVE 8/1/90 FUNDS RECEIVED PRIOR YEAR Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income $1,466.00 $1,973.00 $507.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED FUND TOTAL $1,466.00 $1,973.00 $507.00 PARK & RECREATION FACTY FUND Taxes 3116 Park Rec Facility Tax $17,500.00 $7,000.00 ($10,500.00) NO PROJECTS SUBJECT TO TAX 1ST HALF OF FY Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income $76,129.00 $102,850.00 $26,721.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED Other Revenue 3910 Park/Recreation in Lieu $130,000.00 $130,000.00 $0.00 FUND TOTAL $223,629.00 UUT RAILROAD R/W FUND Taxes 3120 Utility User Tax $863,766.00 Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income $40,077.00 FUND TOTAL $903,843.00 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND Taxes 3120 Utility User Tax Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income $1,295,658.00 $239,850.00 $16,221.00 $863,766.00 $0.00 $40,077.00 $0.00 $903,843.00 $0.00 $1,295,658.00 $0.00 $6,876.00 $8,020.00 FUND TOTAL 31,302,534.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLK GRT FD Intergovernmental/Federal 3713 Housing Rehabilitation 3715 CDBG Administration $1,144.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED $1,303,678.00 $1,144.00 ESTIMATED MIDYEAR INCREASE REVENUE REVISION (DECREASE) JUSTIFICATION 12-31-90 $105,255.00 $11,695.00 $8,832.00 $4,152.00 ($96,423.00) ($7,543.00) CITY COUNCIL WITHDREW FROM PROGRAM CITY COUNCIL WITHDREW FROM PROGRAM 3716 So Bay Free Clinic $0.00 $0.00 $0:00 3717 Juvenile Diversion $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3718 So Bay Coalition Alive $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3719 1736 House $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other Revenue 3904 General Miscellaneous FUND TOTAL $116,950.00 ($4,696.00) $12,984.00 ($103,966.00) ($4,696.00) $0.00 $112,254.00 $8,288.00 ROPOSITION A' FUND L Taxes S 3117 Proposition A Transit $190,000.00 $190,000.00 3121 Subregnl Incentive Funds $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Current Service Charges 3854 Fares Dial A Ride 3855. Bus Passes FUND TOTAL $196,000.00 ($103,966.00) ' $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $196,000.00 $0.00 $19,042.00 $24,502.00 $8,500.00 $6,000.00 $8,500.00 $6,000.00 $14,500.00 $14,500..00 $229,542.00 $235,002.00 $5,460.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,460.00 GRANT FUND Intergovernmental/State 3517 Office of Traffic Sfty 3518 Rec Facilities 3528 Per Capita 3529 Wildlife Consv 3534 Hermosa Parks 3535 Off Emergency Svcs Intergovernmental/Federal 3701 Federal Aid Urban 3712 Federal Emerg Mgmt Agency 540,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $40,500.00 540,500.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 540,500.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 FUND TOTAL 540,500.00 CROSSING GUARD FUND Taxes 3101 Current Year Secured 3103 Prior Year Collections Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 540,500.00 $0.00 ESTIMATED MIDYEAR INCREASE REVENUE REVISION (DECREASE) JUSTIFICATION 12-31-90 565,287.00 $5;000.00 $70,287.00 553,953.00 55,000.00 ($11,334.00) $0.00 S58,953.00 (511,334.00) $2,021.00 52,891.00 FUND TOTAL $72,308.00 COUNCIL REDUCED ASSESSMENT S870.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED 561,844.00 (510,464.00) SEWER FUND Use of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income Intergovernmental/County 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance Current Service Charges 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 3832. Sewer Lateral Installtn 576,597.00 $4,000.00 518,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,000.00 S20,300.00 FUND TOTAL S100,897.00 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND Fines & Forfeitures 3304 Forfeited Funds $312,000.00 Use of Money and Property 3401 Interest Income 57,003.00 3901 Sale of Real/Pers Property $0.00 FUND TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION FUND Use Of Money & Property 3401 Interest Income 5319,003.00 5109,480.00 $32,883.00 54,000.00 50.00 59,000.00 (59,000.00) 51,005.00 (5295.00). $2,740.00 51,740.00 512,745.00 (57,555.00) 5126,225.00 525,328.00 $452,000.00 $8,158.00 $9,000.00 $140,000.00 $1,155.00 $9,000.00 $469,158.00 5150,155.00 516,693.00 521,598.00 Other Revenue 3912 Fire Flow Fee 5100,000.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED LESS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REDUCED BUILDING ACTIVITY 51990+(5150 X 5)=52740 INCREASE IN # OF SEIZURES PENDING TO BE PD IN NEXT 6 MOS HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED SALE OF 2 MUSTANGS 54,905.00 HIGHER FUND BALANCES AND HIGHER RATE OF RETURN THAN ANTICIPATED 5156,000.00 556,000.00 HOTEL PROJECT INCREASED REVENUE BUT ACTIVITY LOWER OTHERWISE FUND TOTAL $116,693.00 INSURANCE FUND Other Revenue 3902 Refunds/Reim Prev Yr 5177,598.00 560,905.00 50.00 52,033.00 52,033.00 RECEIPTS THRU 12/31 FUND TOTAL 50.00 GRAND TOTALS 515,664,544.00 52,033.00 52,033.00 515,457,542.00 (5207,002.00) GENERAL FUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Account/ Account Name 001-401-2101-4107 Premium Overtime 001-401-2101-4307 Radio Maintenance 12-31-90 Approp. 96,000 3,000 001-401-2101-4311 22 Auto Maintenance REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION REVISION MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 1990-91 ORIGINAL REQUESTS Midyear Inc. CM Inc. Justification Request (Dec.) Rec. (Dec.) 120,000 24,000 99,000 3,000 Due to many special events, vacation, sick leave, IOD's, and numerous other causes, including over $3,000 for Emergency Preparedness work necessary to finish out the year. Based on our projections, we asked for $105,000 originally. The estimates did not take into account having over 3 people off duty IOD and having t6 fill the positions. Many of the special details and deployments can only be filled on OT. City Manager Comments: Workers Comp. Credit due $14,340, $3,000 for Emergency Preparedness. Must be closely monitored to control costs. 5,000 2,000 4,500 1,500 Repairs of various radios, not covered by a maintenance contract has increased due to age of the radios. We are asking for an increase to the amount that was originally requested. City Manager Comments: Based on prior year expenditures. 000 25,000 3,000 24,000 2,000 Due to increasing repairs, additional funds requested. Several accidents occurred which were very expensive. EXHIBIT C City Manager Comments: Accidents paid for by insurance fund. Account/ Account Name 001-401-2101-5401 Equipment - Less than $500 001-401-2101-5402 Equipment - More than $500 FIRE DEPARTMENT 12-31-90 Midyear Approp. Request Inc. CM Inc. Justification (Dec.) Rec. (Dec.) 550 3,050 2,500 3,050 2,500 30,086 51,922 21,836 30,086 001-401-2201-4111 18,032 Accrual Cash In 42,332 Several items purchased under 89/90 budget did not arrive until the 90-91 budget was adopted. Funds were not budgeted or transfered from 89/90 to cover expenses. Additional funds also requested to purchase five jail mattresses that must be replaced per LA County Health Dept. Additional funds requested in order to purchase a back-up tape drive for the dispatch/records computer $5,555; and for the purchase of a back-up MicroVax II computer system to allow adequate space and speed for MDT operations which is scheduled to be installed very soon, and to serve as a back-up to the dispatch/records system $14,900. None of these items were anticipated during the budget process, but have been brought to our attention by the GS Director and the software vendor. City Manager Comments: $18,000 available in lease payment account, not needed for MDT lease, hold request pending DP consultant selection and review. 24,300 18,032 -0- As predicted during the regular budget sessions,. the mandatory cash ins for FY budget with the July '90 payroll. This amount was not budgeted for 90/91 and was not carried over from the 89/90 budget. City Manager Comments: Transfer from vacation/sick cash in account. Account/ Account Name 001-401-2201-4119 Fitness Incentive 001-401-2201-5401 Equipment - Less than $500 001-401-2201-5402 Equipment - More than $500 12-31-90 Approp. Midyear Inc. CM Inc. Justification Request (Dec.) Rec. (Dec.) -0- 4,800 4,800 -0- -0- Fitness incentive is an MOU negotiated item that was not budgeted. The expense comes„twice a year, July and January. The July costs have already been deducted and need to be covered with an appropriation. The costs for January need to be appropriated also. City Manager Comments: Transfer from Prospective Expenditures 1,900 3,325 1,425 3,325 1,425 The Safety Officer has advised that the personal alarms on the Self Contained Breathing Apparatus need to be replaced for officer safety. 12 are required. 9,406 8,520 6,420 Requesting replacement funds to allow purchase of two (2) Self Contained Breathing Apparatus air pacs. They are needed in order to have adequate number of air pacs on all units for the officer's safety (3,620). Expenses in the amount of $3,886 were for items budgeted in 89/90. They were not received until the last of July, first of August. The funds were not carried over from the 89/90 budget. 2,100 11,506 TRAFFIC SAFETY 001-401-3104-4309 36,000 Maintenance Mtls. 46,000 City Manager Comments: Replace the two lost Air Pacs, funds for intercom received 89-90. 10,000 40,000 4,000 City Manager Comments: Funds for continuation of sign upgrage, project completion 91-92, $10,000 total. Account/ Account Name PLANNING 12-31-90 Midyear Inc. CM Inc. Justification Approp. Request (Dec.) Rec. (Dec.) 001-401-4101-4102 Regular salaries 195,156 193,781 (1,375) 193,781 (1,375) Portion of salaries paid as administrative costs under Commuter Express program. 001-401-4101-4201 62,000 70,000 8,000 33,150 (28,850) Notices and ads for Housing Improvement Contract Services Program._ City Manager Comments: Noticing $16,500, HIP consultant $7,000, General Plan consulting $10,000. 001-401-4101-4305 15,500 16,040 540 15,500 -0- Polaroid films for code enforcement and Office Oper. Supplies site inspection. @ $15/packet, approximately 3 packets per month - $15x3x12=$540. J City Manager Comments: Expenditures $4,000 12/31/90 001-401-4101-4311 600 1,350 750 600 -0- Paid invoice for $590 out of this Auto Maintenance FY budget instead of last FY. Vehicle was actually repaired last year & funds were available to pay for the work completed. $160 --Additional work needed. City Manager Comments: Transfer from office supplies. Account/ Account. Name BUILDING 12-31-90 Midyear Inc. CM Approp. Request (Dec.) Rec. 001-401-4201-4201 55,827 Contract Svs/Priv. 001-401-4201-4310 578 Motor fuels and lubes COMMUNITY RESOURCES 001-401-4601-4201 65,650 Contract Svcs./Priv. Inc. Justification (Dec.) 96,957 41,130 96,957 41,130 (1) $45,000 of total appropriation was for plan check services. To date, $34,333 has been spent for that purpose of which over $15,000 was attributable to the hotel project. It is estimated that an additional $10,000 will be needed above appropriation. (Plan check revenue was increased $25,000) (2) Funds for AB939 Source Reduction Recycling Element project were requested during budget preparation, but were denied due to unknown costs. County Sanitation District now estimates our share of AB939 Group 4 at $28,000. Adding a 10% contingency, the needed appropriation is $31,130. Costs could be recovered through fees. 1,000 422 578 -0- Increased fuel costs. City Manager Comments: Transfer from within department accounts. 56,650 (9,000) 56,650 (9,000) Delete funding, Dispute Resolution Services per City Council 7/10/91. TOTAL $604,979 $748,713 $143,734 $627,729 $22,750 Account/ 12-31-90 Midyear Inc. CM Account Name Approp.. Request (Dec.) Rec. PARKING FUND PARKING ENFORCEMENT 110-401-3302-4112 42,000 76,446 Part-time/Temp. TOTAL CDBG FUND HOUSING REHABILITATION 140-401-4701-4201 105,255 Contract Services 140-401-4703-4201 11,695 ,CDBG Administration Inc. (Dec.) Justification 34,446 -0- -0- IOD's, light duty and additional temporary help. $42,000 $76,446 $34,446 -0- TOTAL City Manager Comments: Transfer from Regular Salaries. 8,832 (96,423) 8,832 (96,423) City Council withdrew 4,152 (7,543) 4,152 (7,543) City Council withdrew $116,950 $12,984 ($103,966)$12,984($103,966) PROPOSITION A FUND COMMUTER EXPRESS 145-401-3408-4201 -0- Contract Services TOTAL -0- 1,375 1,375 1,375 $1,375 $1,375 -0- $1,375 from the program. from the program. Amount approved by LACTC for 15% administration cost. Account/ 12-31-90 Midyear Inc. CM Account Name SEWER FUND Approp. Request (Dec.) Rec. SEWERS AND STORM DRAINS 160-401-3102-5403 70,000 Vehicles TOTAL 82, 000 Inc. Justification (Dec.) 12,000 82,000 12,000 Cost of used vehicle and trailer higher than appropriation. Need new trailer to meet weight limitations and be legal. $70,000 $82,000 $12,000 $82,000 $12,000 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS 170-401-2103-5402 Equipment - More than $500 170-401-2103-5403 Vehicles 170-401-2103-6900 TOTAL City Manager Comments: Trailer for used crawler. -0- 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Several radio problems have arisen for the units assigned to the Westnet operation in order to have adequate communications for the success of the operation and the safety of the officers. The mobile radios must be replaced. 20,300 -0- -0- (20,300) -0- 20,300 20,300 -0- -0- City Manager Comments: Transfer to lease account. -0- $20,300 $24,300 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 Account/ 12-31-90 Midyear Inc. CM Approp. Request (Dec.) Rec. Account Name CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 305-401-8604-4201 23,768 34,768 11,000 23,768 Various Bldg. Imp. Contract Svcs. L 305-401-8506-4309 Various Park/ Recreation Facilities Imp. 305-401-8510-4201 Implementation - Parks Master Plan Inc. (Dec.) Justification -0- $6,000 Clark Building floor finishing $5,000 paint jail cells. City Manager Comments: Jail cells inhouse, bid Clark building with gym floor for aesthetic improvement only as major work to be coordinated with seismic work. Make budget changes with contract approval. 24,500 35,000 10,500 35,000 10,500 Council action April 24th, 1990. Roof repair, funds not reappropriated. Attachment #1 -0- 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Parks commission recommendation regarding Master Plan, 12/5/90. Attachment #2, Design 5 lots at Edith Rodaway Park, 11/27/90 item, Attachment #3. City Manager Comments: Use of Park Recreation Facility Tax Funds for these three CIP projects. Account/ 12-31-90 Midyear Inc. CM Inc. Account Name Approp. Request (Dec.) Rec. (Dec.) Justification 305-401-8406-4201 Sanitary Sewer 1,920,163 1,870,163 (50,000) 1,870,163 (50,000) Imp. Target 4 Bids received less than budgeted amount. TOTAL $1,968,431 $2,039,931 $71,500 $2,028,931 $60,500 LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 705-401-1209-4324 50,000 135,000 85,000 135,000 85,000 Settlement of larger than usual claim against the City (LaFay vs City of Hermosa Beach). Claims/Settlements TOTAL $50,000 $135,000 $85,000 $135,000 $85,000 bC PARKS, RECREATION, & COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION PRIORITIZED LIST FOR CIP PROJECTS MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 1990/91 Hermosa Valley Park 1. Remove School District's play equipment (on grass). This project is scheduled to be done by the California Conservation Corps at the end of December, 1990. Done. 2. Lay out Soccer Field diagonally on Valley Park Field to see if it will fit without interfering with Baseball Diamond. Public Works has this project currently in progress. 3. Skin Baseball Infields. City Council authorized the reseeding of grass and this has already been done. Note: If the infield grass is removed, it will require relocation of the irrigation line at a total cost of $20,000. 4. Put in modular picnic areas. Estimated cost $15,000 5. Resurface Basketball Court (not relocate it). Estimated cost $10,000. 6. Remove People Sprinkler and replant grass. Will be completed by the California Conservation Corps scheduled for March, 1991. 7. Purchase uniform signs for park including new Valley Park sign on Gould and Valley. Sandblasted 3" X 6" sign: $1,500. Clark Field 1. Tear down small shed in southwest portion of Clark Field. Will be completed by the California Conservation Corps scheduled for March, 1991.. 2. Improve backstop behind Clark Building (southeast suction of Clark Field). Estimate: $500 for improvements. Included in CIP-506 already. 3. Purchase fencing for pitching area (50 feet each side). - 1 - 69 Public Works submitted this to Council and it was not approved. The low bid was $3,600. Not recommended for funding at midyear. . Place barrier around field to prevent auto access. Estimated cost $2,000. 5. Purchase sign for Clark Field visible from Valley Drive. Sandblasted 3' x 6' sign (post installed) $1,500. 6. Look into parking adjacent to new Basketball Courts. Pending review. Edith Rodaway_Park 1. Develop new parcels per master plan. Estimated cost $50,000. GENERAL FUND Account/ Account Name CITY ATTORNEY 001-401-1131-4201 Contract Services FINANCE 001-401-1202-4201 Contract Svcs./ Private PERSONNEL 001-401-1203-4316 — Training 001-401-1203-4317 Conference 001-401-1203-4327 AQMD Incentives 001-401-1212-4188 Employee Benefits PUBLIC WORKS MEDIANS 001-401-3101-4102 Regular Salaries 001-401-3101-4309 Maintenance Mtls. 12-31-90 Approp. 115,000 66,095 REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION REVISION MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 1990-91 2ND ROUND REDUCTIONS Midyear Request 107,500 52,645 Inc. Justification (Dec.) (7,500) Reduction based on 1st half expenditures (13,450) Due to selection of new auditor via bid process, contract less than amount budgeted 3,200 2,400 (800) Eliminate CSULB Attendance 915 740 (175) Eliminate IPMA Conference 3,200 1,580 (1,620) Plan approved Nov. Do not need full year. 670,458 50,847 6,000 642,458 49,847 5,500 F7NTRTT Tl (28,000) Result of reduction in benefit structure to increase co -payments (1,000) Changes in Personnel (500) Estimated saving through year end Account/ Account Name STREET MAINTENANCE 001-401-3103-4102 Regular Salaries Misc. 12-31-90 Midyear Inc. Justification Approp. Request (Dec.) 155,214 153,314 (1,900) Changes in personnel 001=401-3103-4309 14,800 13,800 `(1,000) Estimated savings through year end Maintenance Mtls. TRAFFIC SAFETY 001-401-3104-4102 Regular Salaries/ Misc. PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 001-401-4202-4102 Regular salaries/ Misc. N 001-401-4202-4201 Contract Svcs./ Private 001-401-4202-4316 Training 001-401-4202-4317 Conference Expense BUILDING MAINTENANCE 001-401-4204-4321, Safety/Security EQUIPMENT SERVICE 001-401-4205-4102 Regular salaries/ Misc. 106,327 99,327 (7,000)'" Changes in personnel 191,877 183,877 (8,000) Changes in personnel 3,000 2,000 (1,000) No additional work needed this FY 2,000 1,800 (200) Will cut back training 1,000 800 (200) Will cut back conference expense 8;000 7,000 (1,000) Less vandalism than estimated. 104,362 103,362 (1,000) Changes in personnel. Account/ Account Name 001-401-4205-4309 Maintenance Mtls. PLANNING 001-401-4102-4317 Conference expense BUILDING 001-401-4201-4102 Regular salaries/ misc. 001-401-4201-4317 Conference expense 001-400-4201-5403 Vehicles ) COMMUNITY RESOURCES 001-401-4601-4201 Contract Services/ Private TOTAL 12-31-90 Approp. 4,500 Midyear Request Inc. Justification (Dec.) 4,000 (500) Estimated savings through year end 1,200 800 (400) Reduce Planning Commission's conference expense 241,390 1,500 11,,000 56,650 231,390 (10,000) Staff shortages (1,500) Unable to attend conference due to conflict 9,708 (1,292) Vehicle was purchased at lower price 40,650 (16,000) Reduction of Grant writing Services. ($10,000) $1,818,535 $1,714,498 $104,037 Per Council action August 28, 28, 1990. Agreements for 1736 House and Sister Cities not approved. ($6,000) 0' ®' ®:, 'FINANCE-FA484 TIME"' -15;'49: 15 --- `—FUND' "— OBJ-' -DESCR I P.TION _—_ 001. GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12701790 TO 12/31/90 EST-I2EV- PAGE 0001 MONTHLY-gE'/ YEAR TO DATE C)AT� 00/41 - 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALI ZED BALANCE X -- 3100' TAXES 3101 3102 3103 3106 3107 -3108 - 3110 3111 3112 3113 3114 3115 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /CURRENT YEAR SECURED /CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED /PRIOR -YEAR -COLLECTIONS /SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813 /TRANSFER TAX 7SALES TA:( /CABLE TV FRANCHISE /ELECTRIC FRANCHISE 7GAS-FRANCHISt /REFUSE FRANCHISE /TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY /BUSINESS -LICENSE 3200 -LICENSES -AND -PERMITS 3202 3203 3204 3205 3206 3207- 3209 3211 3212 3213 3214 OBJECT- SUBTOTAL 3, 035, 712. 00 1, 223, 203. 28 207, 756. 00 0. 00 -53, 000. 00 37-,--05-4. 94- 1,223,203.28 4- 80, 000. 00 38, 426. 92 116, 244. 00 12, 221. 64 3, 929,-824: 00--195^761- 94 114, 000. 00 0. 00 39, 882. 00 0. 00 29: 603. 00 J. 00 147, 000. 00 0. 00 277, 175. 00 0. 00 -425, 000.'00' 45,-8811 89 6, 455, 196. 00 1, 478, 440. 73 1,223,203.28 185, 967. 55 32,-476751- 38, 426. 92 43, 265. 03 932,-2407-1-3 58, 536. 69 0. 00 0--30 58, 012. 33 106, 616. 73 215, 091: 22 2, 828, 883. 37 1, 812, 508. 72 40. 2 21, 788. 45 89. 5 85, 476-51 6"1-. 2 41, 573. 08 48. 0. 72, 978. 97 37. 2 997; 583.87 48. 3 55, 463. 31 51. 3 39, 882. 00 0. 0 29, E03: 00 0. 0 88, 987. 67 39. 4 170, 558. 27 38. 4 209, 900. 78 50. 6 3, 626, 312. 63 4:3.8 /DOG LICENSES /BICYCLE LICENSES /BUILDING PERMITS /ELECTRIC PERMITS /PLUt1BING PERMITS /OCCUPANCY-PERMTS /GARAGE SALES /BANNER PERMITS TANIMAL7FOWL-PERMITS 17, 107. 00 300. 00 170,000.-00 40, 000. 00 32, 000. 00 4, 600. 00 /ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE /AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301- 7VERTCLE CODE-CIIDE7ITTONS 3303 . //COURT FINES/POLICE DEPT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 80. 00 1, 300. 00 800-00 3, 500. 00 540. 00 270; 227: 00 369. 50 12, 759. 50 12. 00 57. 00 57875. 43 145, 219 83 2, 322. 00 12, 441. 00 1, 268. 45 10, 431. 45 325700 . 37-925. 00 6. 00 72. 00 350.00 550.00 ion. -too- 200.00 4, 347. 50 74. 5 243. 00 19. 0 24, 780.-17 -- 85. 4 -- 27, 559. 00 31. 1 21,568. 55 32. 5 675. 00 85. 3 B. 00 90. 0 750. 00 42. 3 600. 00 25. 0 315. 00 2, 259. 00 1, 241. 00 64. 5 30.00 790.00 250.00- 146. 2 -f0 773-38- f8-8, 704778 81, b22: 22-. --6.9: 8 115; 000.-00 0:00 51, 000. 00 0. 00 166, 000. 00 0. 00 3400 USE OF MONEY 3401 3402 3403 3404 3405 3406 3411 3412 & PROPERTY /INTEREST INCOME 7RENTS--&-CONCESSIONS /PIER REVENUE /CQMM CTR LEASES 7COMM-CTR"-RENTAL, /COMM CTR THEATRE /OTHER FACILITIES /TENNIS COURTS` - 194, 701.00 2, 000:00 10, 700. 00 81, 000. 00 52, 000. 00 30, 000. 00 24, 000. 00 12, 000700 54,1=31 28, 595. 79 82, 709. 10 60, 886. 69 — 47. 0' 22, 404. 21 55 0 83, 290 90 19 0 1, 324. 51 37, 807. 51 156, OVJ. 19 10 4 166T'33 -1, 803. 77 176. 2.3 70 1 484. 90 6, 902. 90 . 3, - 97. 10 61 ., 5, 497. 60 43, 231. 43 110, 76U ::7 ;. t .I --.-1;...339: 00'--23; 514 75 .... 28, 485 25 • ,P., 1, 409. 15 11, 100. 15 26, 099. 05 29. 2 2, 046. 00 12, 326. 65 11, 673.:35 51. 3 806. 25 --57792:-70----.-- -6, 207. 30-----' • 48. 2 z4 31 L F.I NANCE-FA484 49: 15 1 0 =1 1.?; - um) -IDE? zr- D ESC R IP T ON s I 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/90 'TO -12/31/90 DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 -USE -OF -MONEY -3z PROPERiY COH 3416 /SPECIAL EVENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 4114 az7 110 110 • LZ4 1.0 31 1/C F° D41 4Z 044 45 40 D47 40 3504 3505 3507 3508 3509 3510 3511 3514 OBJECT SUBTOTAL EST-REY -MONTHEY-RLV rEAR IU DAIL PAGE 0002 IJA-TE-0270-6/9 f 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREAL. I ZED BAEAFTCE 38, 000. 00 0. 00 16, 716. eo 21, 283. 20 43. 9 ce 3 0 6, 0 L.1 455, 401. 00 13, 073. 74 159, 196. 66 296, 204. 34 34.9 , 0. 00 188. 82 144. 18 56. 7 /IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 333.00 /IN LIEU-MOTOR-VEF-IICLE- 614. 00 /HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 3, 000. 00 /MANDATED COSTS 0. 00 /1-10MEOWNER-PROP-TX-RECTE- *65, 000. 00 /POST 42, 000. 00 /STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 8, 500. 00 IGARETTE-TAX---- 37; 207700 890, 654. 00 -3800- CURRENT -SERVICE -CHARGES - 3801 3802 3803 3806 3808 31309 3810 3811 3812 3813 3814 3815 3817 3818 3819 3820 3821 3823 3824 3825 3026 3827 3831 3834 3836 3837 3,83/3 15 ,1 56, 942..83-343, 826780 390;787:20.- --4-6:- 8.--- • 0. 00 1, 294. 06 1, 705. 94 43. 1 0. 00 3, 502. 00 ' 3, 502. 00- 0. 0 13,763. 73 -----8;763:73---7-7- -56; 236.. -27 -------13: 4. -- - - • 586. 02 28, 704. 85 13, 295. 15 68. 3 0. 00 0. 00 4, 194: 99 20.053.64 70, 487. 57 406, 333. 90 8, 500. 00 0. 0 17,153. 38- 484, 320. 10 45. 6 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION /SIGN REVIEW /ENWIRONMENTAE7-IMPAUF /BOARD OF APPEALS /ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW /TENTATIVE -MAP -REVIEW /FINAL MAP REVIEW - /ZONE CHANGE G P A /CONDli.LUNAE-USE-REViLw 9, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 -6, 075. 00 300. 00 1, 920. 00 5,1350. 00 - 2, 250. 00 1, 800. 00 23, 250.-00 440. 00 50. 00 -236700 0. 00 0. 00 225. 00 125. 00 0. 00 1, 280. 00 /PLAN CHECK FEES 105, 000. 00 1, 673. 09 /PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL - .2, 132. 00 266. 50 -/PUBLIC-WORKS-SERVICES- "10; 000. 00 -241:00 /SPECIAL CURB MARKING 300.00 /POLICE SERVICES 17, 000. 00 /JATE-SERVTCES 10-,-200700 /TRUSTY ADMIN FEE 200.00 0. 00 1, 803. 00 170700 0. 00 4, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 44. 4 650.00 350.00 65:0 5, 150.00 9257.00. 0. 00 300. 00 0. 0 • 1,.280. 00 640. 00 4.it) 2, 025.: 00- - 3; 825. 00 34. 6 1, 750. 00 500. 00 77. 7 450. 00 1, 350. 00 25. 0 1275077-00 10, 743:100- 5:.3. 7 928. 19 99. 1 799. 50 62. 655. 05 4 100.00 200. 00 ' 33. 3 16,078. 18 921. 82 94. 5 37300700 6, 90000 32. 3- 1, 120. 00 920. 00- 560. 0 1, 197. 00 52. 1 31, 204. 00 * 30. 6 1, 398. 00 53. 4 50. 00 30. 00 62. 5 187-843.120 22, 956. 80 4, 788. 00 0. 00 100. 0 104, 071. 81 1, 332. 50 9; 344:95 /FINGERPRINT SERVICE 2, 500. 00 132. 00 1, 303. 00 -/SPECIEVENTSECURTTY 45;000.00 0. 00 - 796: 00 /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES 3, 000. 00 /PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 80.00 /REC-PR OGRAMS7 L ASSES 4 I -Tem -Too /LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 4, 788. 00 12. 00 1, 602. 00 10. 00 820. 00 0. 00 /STREET CUT INSPECTION 15, 000. 00 125. 00 9, 764. 13 /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE 7, 500. 00 /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 800. 00 /SAL-E-OF-MAPS7P0BLICATIU 800. 00 394. 80 80. 00 9. 90 2, 847. 80 340. 00 31.1770-- 5, 235. 87 9, 205. 10 4, 652. 20 65 0 47.6 37.9 460. 00 42. 5 • 488.30'-_..._.-...3e. 1 FINANCE-FA484 (1 TIME' --I5:49: 15 11 9 m= - I, O' I3 ®:, FUND -OBJ- DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3800 -CURRENT-SERVICE CHARGES I"' 1-' ® .. v ®J1 C f I Y (lt= 1 ILItI-IOSA BEACH I REVENUE L;UMI-IARY REPORT (EY F --UNI) FROM 12/01/90 TO 12/31/90 - EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR- TO DATE 3839 /PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 3840 /AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 3841 7POCICE-TOWING 3656 3857 3858 3859 3861 3862 3863 3866 386T • '3868 3869 OBJECTSUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 3902 3903 3904 /GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT /PKG PLAN APPLICATION /TENANT REFUSE -BILGING- /REFUSE LIEN FEE /HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT /ALARM -PERMIT -FEE /FALSE ALARM FEE /NONCONFORMING REMODELS -7PRECISE-DEVLMNT--PLANS- /PUBLIC NOTICING/300 FT /2ND PARTY RESPONSE 1. 000. 00 8, 500. 00 26, 500. 00- 900. 00 960. 00 200: 00 500. 00 2, 090. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 00 3, 200. 00 - -320- 00 50, 000. 00 0. 00 430, 225-00 ;5....;1 1.AIE u.1,..6i91 50.0% or YE:AFI COMPLETE UNREALIZED _ BALANCE 206. 10 779. 80 220. 20 77. 9 809. 54 3, 480. 04 5, 019. 96 40. 9 2, 835: 00-- -15:742:60 10, 757. 40 ----- - 59: 4 - - O. 00 . O. 00 900. 00 0. 0 O. 00 O. 00 960. 00 , 0 0 0-- 00 80. 00 120. 00 40. 0 3, 968. 90 5, 859. 76 5. 359. 74- 1171. 9 O. 00 O. 00 2, 000. 00 0.1D f20: 00 530:00 --- --- - .-.- 470. 00 - -----53. 0 200- 00 1, 100. 00 320. 00 640. 00 0. 00- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 994. 20 1, 100. 00- 2, 560. 00 - 320. 00 50. 000. 00 994. 20- 26, 546. 83 254T406. 57 175,-818. 43 7SACE-OF-RE4L7PERS PROP-- 0, 000.-00 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 500.00 /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 5, 000. 00 /GENERAL -MISCELLANEOUS 5; 196: 00 3908 /DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION 40.000.00 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1, 601, 034. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 659,,-730106 DEPT 0000 ® 14 115 ® :O 1.1 154 ®C t� TOTALS 10, 327, 433. 00 FUND TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 1, 509. 00 4; 892-3u 0. 00 133, 127. 83 -139-,-529. 19 1, 728, 851. 44 11, 374. 00 23, 727. 80 5, 121. 14 7, 507: 09 0. 00 802, 266. 98 849, 997.01 0. 0 20. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 - 59. 1 3, 374. 00- 142. 1 23. 227. 80- • 4745. 5 121. 14- 102. 4 2, 311. 09- _.._._ 144. 4 40, 000. 00 0. 0 798, 767. 02 50. 1 809. 732:99 51. 2 4,770;231.39 5, 557, 201. 41 46. 1 10, 327-433700- 1-; 728 E51.-44 47776; 231. 39 5, 557, 201-41 • 46.1 4i 0' FINANCE-FA484 TIME"" 15: 49: 15'-- 4 ®. ®' 11i 14 FUND BODESCRIPTION 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 -TAXES '13 f,o 3101 3103 OBJECT' SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM ' 12701'790 70 -12/31790 ES I NEV—MON AR I U VA L E PAGE 0004 DATE--02706/91- 50.0% ATE-272706/91...50.OX OF YEAR COMPLETE :AL, UNREALIZED <i 13ALARCE /CURRENT YEAR SECURED 296, 124.00 71, 714.77 71, 714.77 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 5,000.00 0.00 15, 694.25 30I; 124. 00' -77F,714:77- 87; 409-02 224, 409. 23, 24. 2 10,694.25- 313.8 213:714.98 -29:0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME - -747525:00- 929.-36 —26, 803 78 47721722 - OBJECT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 74, 525. 00 929. 36 26, 803. 78 47, 721. 22 35.9 35. 9 DEPT- 0000-iDTAES 375, 649. 00 —72; b4'4 -'I3 1I4; 212.:80-----"----251;435:-20 - - -30:4 ."-. FUND TOTAL 375, 649. 00 72, 644. 13 114, 212. 80 .3 9 :s 26.1 , 436. 20 30. 4 31 34 1- 13 46 :7 40 31 - 54 56 56 , -I . WL • 0 • 0' 0' F / NANCE-FA484 --TIME--15r49:15 DESCRIP TION 109 VEHICLE PARK I NG D I ST DEPARTMENT 0000 _ .17 11E. 0'• CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01790 -TO- 12/31/90 - EST REV 3400 USE -OF -MONEY -Ili -PROPERTY MONTHLY REV 41t. PACE 0005 ---pc,rEfb2.70'6/91 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 3407 /PARKING LOT RENTAL 3409 ' VEHICLE- PKG-DIST7COT- B 3413 VEHICLE PKG DIST/VPD LEASE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 14, 966. 00 22;99o: 00' 66, 084. 00 104, 040. 00 61. 00 1, 242. 00 1,'915. 84 3, 543. 60 6, 762. 44 444. 15 444. 15- 0. 0 8, 929. 92 6. 036. 08 59. 6 fI7495. 04 11, 494. 96 50. 0 — • 47, 606. 53 18, 477. 47 72. 0 4 68, 475. 64 35, 564. 36 65. 8 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3845 /VPD LOT PERMITS/DAILY 7,771. 3846 /VPD-E0T-PERMITS/MONTHEN '10,985. 3847 VEHICLE PKG DIST/VALIDATION STAMPS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 00 00 22, 000. 00 40, 756. 00 DEPT 0000 TOTALS FUND TOTAL 144, 796. 00 796.95 fT1731-00 2, 163. 98 4, 133. 93 10, 896. 37 144, 796. 00 10, 896. 37 4, 967. 89 2. 003. 11 5,149. 31 5, 835. 69 12, 364. 23 9, 635. 77 22, 481. 43 , 18, 274. 57 90, 957. 07 90, 957. 07 53, 038. 93 53, 838. 93 9 46 3 56. 2 55. 1 62. 8 62. 8 0:z '33 S.* '4. 44 0- FINANCE-FA484 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) . PAGE 0006 (1-1-----TIME--15: 13 • 49:15 FROM 12/01790 TO 12/31/90 DATE 02/06/v1 50.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED 'mu) Ir 1 5 URO ---DESCRIPTION Ebi HEV KONTHEY-R EV YEAR 10 DALE BALANCE X 110 PARKING FUND kft lc DEPARTMENT 0000 1 1 12 J300 FINES -Z-, -FORFETTUREE 3302 /COURT FINES/PARKING 1, 351, 000. 00 107, 882. 45 667, 473. 47 683, 526. 53 . 49. 4 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 351, 000. 00 107, 882. 45 667, 473. 47 683. 526. 53 49. 4 114 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY . 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 15, 510. 00 198. 48 6, 090. 39 9, 419. 61 39. 2 I , 17 340/ PARKTN6 L 1 (ENTAL /, ,..00. 00 600700 1 . 00570-42.700 29. 9 3409 /LOT B O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 0 3413 /VPD LEASE .0. 00 O. 00 ' O. 00 O. 00 O. 0 Ito 12 B TOTAL <;-710: 00. 98. 4t1 H, 2487-39 -14-, 46f7LT- OJECT-SUB.. 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES J z.: -ME1Lb /00T000. 00 16, 6207E6 -38272E1747 817-,-728:53------5476-- • 3842 IP ARKINGH 3843 /PARKING PERMITS: ANNUAL 185, 000. 00 706. 00 17; 877. 00 167, 123. 00 9. 6 3844 /DAILY PARKING PERMITS 1, 234_ 00 O. 00 1, 640. 00 406. 00- 132. 9 25 L -3845 /VPD-EUT-PERMITSYDATEY O. 00 07-00 25. uG 25. 00- 07 0 3846 /VPD LOT PERMITS/MONTHLY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 • 0.0 3847 /VALIDATION STAMPS 0.00 0.00 0.00 O. 00 0.0 211 130 ,84.13 /ORTVERAY PERM. 1 b 1.02O0 0.00 149750 882. 5-0 14.4- - r 3849 /GUEST PERMITS 752.00 100.00 573. 00 . 179.00 76. 1 3850 /CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS 720. 00 60. 00 1, 420. 00 700. 00- 197.2 -4847792. - - 131 33 OBJECT -SUBTOTAL -8887738. 00 1-7, 486.-86 403, 945. 97 . 03-- 45. 4 , • 3900 OTHER REVENUE . . 34 '3 3902 /HEruNus/hEiMB-PREV-TR 0700 O. 00 687. 70 687770- OBJECT SUBTOTAL O. 00 O. 00 687. 70 687. 70- O. 0 : I -1-,-oe-o, FJ7 JO DEFr--0000 i OTALb 2.262.44800 -----1267167. 79 355.-53 1, 182;092. 47 477 . 40 .41 [• FUND TOTAL 2, 262, 448. 00 126, 167: 79 1, 080, 355. 53 1, 182, 092. 47 47. 7 • :4 1.3- [ . • . , • 44 47 AB N • 1 42 30 51 . .. . • . ' 32 • ! 67 ( • . . . 1 1 / v . a a 0 a 6 L t. 0 c FINANCE-FA484 TIME 15: 49: 15 FUND- —DBJ-DESCR I PT /ON I:, ®1 113 CO' 11r. CIFY OF 111:':Iil'IUEir, UEACI 1 LVL-P1U1r. SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/90 TO 12J31/90- - 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 34007 USE- OF MONEY"& -PROPERTY EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3500 INTERGOVERN11ENTAL/STATE 3501 3502 3503 3512 3522" OBJECT SUBTOTAL' 3900 OTHER REVENUE /SECTION 2106 ALLOCAT1ON 7SECTION -2107-ALLOCATION /SECT 2107: 5 ALLOCATION /SECTION 2105 (PROP 111) 7TDA-ARTICLE-3-(SD821-) — 0 PA:,E 0007 L,A I L_ U2/0.6/q1 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE I C UNREALIZED 19, 360. 00 19, 360. 00 83, 299. 00 174; 260. 00 4, 000. 00 0.00 "45f; 656. 00 713, 223. 00 .3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL - DEPT 0000 6, 151. 80 6. 151. 80 21, 743. 30 2, 383. 30- 112. 3 21, 743. 30 2, 383. 30-- 112. 3 7, 807. 98 —i6; 529-78 O. 00 6, 576. 54 0.-0o 30, 914. 30 35, 6?6. 82 47, 602. 18 42. 8 73, 756. 19 100, 511. 81 42. 3 4, 000. 00 0. 00 100. 17, 807. 13 17, 807. 13- 0. 0 O. 00 451, 656. 00 O. 0 131, 260. 14 581, 962. 86 18. 4 5, 000. 00 5', 000. 00 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 TOTALS 5, 000. 00 0. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 00 100. 0 100. 0 737, 563. 00 42, 066. 10 158, 003. 44 579, 579. 56 21. 4 FUND TOTAL 737, 583. 00 42, 066. 10 153, 003. 44 575), 7'9. ... .:1 •i t:. . v✓ • FI NANCE-FA484 "TIME 13- 49: 13 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) 'FROM 12/01190 PAGE 0008 ' / - I' 11 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED FUND OBj DESCRIPTION EST -REV ------MONTHLY REV YEAH IU BAIE BACANCE 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 • -3400 -USE-OF7MONEY-&-PROPERTY , 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 1, 466. 00 174. 64 689. 97 776.03 47. 0 OBJECT SUB TOTAL 1, 466. 00 174.64 689. 97 776.03 47. 0 a 1 " : : 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 /BUDGETED TRANSFERS IN 5, 938. 00 5, 938. 00 5, 938. 00 O. 00 100. 0 I 1 '7 IU OBJECT- SUBTOTAL 5, 93800 5, 938. 00 5793800 0. 00 I0U:0-- DEPT 0000 . TOTALS 7, 404. 00 6, 112. 64 6, 627. 97 776. 03 89. 5 IS. r. 21 . 1. ) 1z4 FUND -TOTAL 1.404. 00 67112-. 64 67627797-- zn [ [1:t 17 ;L. F40 41 14 44 111 . _ . • • ' • 1.1 :1. a 0 0 0 I • . a a ' a 46, 44. 4' 4' 4' km. F I NANCE-FA484 TIME 15: 49: 15 or 111-4C FUND--- J--DESCR IPT I ON CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4:11 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009 FROM .12Y01/90 'TO' 12/31..190--- - DATE .02/0-6./91 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE • C. UNREALIZED 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND . _ DEPARTMENT 0000 3100• TAXES 3116 /PARK REC FACILITY TAX OBJECT SUBTOTAL EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. 17, 500. 00 8, 580. 00- 17, 500. 00 8, 580. 00- 0. 00 17, 500. 00 0. 0 0. 00 17. 500. 00 0. 0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 76, 129. 00 1, 445. 69 OBJECT -SUBTOTAL 76, 129. 00- 17445769 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910-- - --------/PARK7RECREATION-IN-L-IEU--130; '000. 00. -87580. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 130, 000. 00 8, 580. 00 DEPT -0000 -TOTALS 2236290O 1, 445. 69 FUND TOTAL . _ 223, 629. 00 1, 445. 69 34, 360. 20 34, 360.20 41, 768. 80 41, 768. 80 -771220S-00 52, 780. 00 77, 220. 00 52, 780. 00 45.1 45. 1 59. 4 57. 4 • 111, 580. 20 112, 048. 80 49.8 .- 111, 580. 20 112, 048. 80 49.8 o'• ;779E7", 'T7 73!"-"77-"7 . lt..FTWERt " 0 m r 8 0 ® . O ' 0 0 OI ©' FINANCE -F-A4134 TIME 15:49.15 OBJ" - DESCRIPTION 126 UUT RAILROADRIGHT OF WAY FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES :11:'0 /UTILITY USER TAX ABJECT SUBTOTAL 3400 USE OF MONEY °< PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT-SUBTOTAL- DEPT BJECT-SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL CITY (IF HERMIISA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0010 FROM 12/01/90 TO 12/31/90 ' D.'TE 02/G6/71 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED EST- REV --` MONTHLY -REV -:- 06D, 766. 00 063, 766 00 71, 311 73 420, 545.58' 71, :311 /3 420, 545. 58 443, 220 42 443, 220 4 2 48. 6 48, 5 40, 077. 00 2, 792 23^� 1.4, 499. 39 25, 577 61 36 1 ._'3 .--.- ----I4; 499:39 . -_5.577 61 - .. 36 I - -'- 40; 077. 00 - - - - ?; 79;' ''. '� TOTALS 903, 043. 00 74, 103 96 435, 044. 97 460, 790 03 5037043: 00 '747103.-96 435; 044.-97 ---._--.- 46R; -79E- 03 - •10 1 FINANCE—FA484 — TIP1E ..13:49: 15 FUND _. -OBJ DESCRIPTION 127 67. UTILITY USER TAX FUND DEPAR TMEI'IT 0000 - --- 106, 928. 07 3100 TAXES 1 , 295, 650. 00 3120 /UTILITY USER TAX 1, 295, 650. 00 106 920. 07 OBJECT SUBTOTAL _. __..._ 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 6,876.00 3401 /INTEREST INCOME _ ___.___-.___6._ 1376. 00 --- OBJECT—SUBTOTAL 1, 302, 534. 00 108, 346. 36 CITY OF HERMOSA 13EACII REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUL�? FROM 12/01/90 TO 12/31/90 -- EST -REV— — 'MONTHLY REV. YEAR TO DATE 1, 418. 29 1, 418. 29 ._. DEI' 1 0000 FUND TOTAL I) . TOTALS 1, 302,-534: 00 630, 778. 89 630,770.89 1, 767. 48 1, 767. 48 632, 546. 37 108, 346.-36 - 632, 546. 37 P; _E ?011 12t,1 fIc 02,'06/?1 50. 07 OF YEAR CUMPI_E IE. UNREALIZED - -BALANCE 664, 079. 11 66=1, ? 11 5, 102 52 5, 108. 52 f,.,9, Cf.' 63 40 6 4) j 25. 1 25 7 411 6.9, 9137 63 •i))3 `_, • pi--; 50 it FINANCE-FA484 'TIME- 1.5:49:15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/90 TO 12/31/90 ' FUND 0B:l--DESCRIPTION -EST-REV------MONTHLY REV VEAIt 1U DAL 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3700 INTER GOVERNMENT/FEDERAL 3713 /HOUSING REHABILITATION 3715 /CDBG ADMINISTRATION OBJECT SUBTOTAL' _ .--.------.--...____ _-_- .. ..._-__. . 105, 255. 00 11, 695. 00 - 116, 950. 00 ' " 0. 00 0. 00 8, 831. 00 3, 573. 00 -12, 404: 00 PAGE 0012 DATE -02/06/5i 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED -L'ACAFJCE- 96, 424. 00 0:.3 8, 122. 00 30. 5 "' 104, 546.00 10- 6 3900 OTHER REVENUE -73904 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS- -47696.00- 4, 695. 94- 47695794-- 0..06- 99.9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4,696.00- 4,695.94- 4,695.94- 0.06- 99 9 FUND TOTAL -7;708: 06 1 04, 545: 94 112, 254. 00 4, 695. 94- 7, 708. 06 104, 545: 94 32 3:) •7 6. 0 , t, • w • ® CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) �, -TIME'-15:49-15 FROM 12/01/90 'TO 12731/90 ®2 3 -FUND -` OBJ DESCRIPTION- EST REV MONTHLY REV • i DI IU 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES YEAR TO DATE 3117 /PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 3121 SUBREONL INCENTIVE FUNDS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 190, 000. 00 6, 000. 00 196; 000 00 21, 833. 00 94, 886. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2i, 833:00 ----- 94; 886. 00 0013 -L' 11E 02/0-6/91 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLE FE UNREALIZED 95, 114. 00 6, 000. 00 101, 114. 00 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST -INCOME -19,-042.-00 --234-97 -6-, 69g 54 12, 343.46 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 19, 042. 00 234. 97 6, 698. 54 12, 343. 46 49. 9 0 0 48.4 35. 1 3800 CURRENT SERVICE -CHARGES 3854 /FARES, DIAL A RIDE 8,500.00 0. 00 0. 00 8,500.00 0. 0 3855 /BUS PASSES 6, 000. 00 546. 00 2, 816. 00 3, 184. 00 46. 9 OBJECT- SUBTOTAL 14, 500. 00 546. 00 2, 816. 00 11, 684. 00 19. 4 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 229, 542. 00 22, 613. 97 104, 400. 54 125, 141. 46 45. 4 -FUND - TOTAL 229, 542. 00 22, 613. 97 104, 400. 54 . 125, 141. 46 45. 4 0 61,1 I"Ir4ANCE-FA4B4 TIME"15:49: 15 ' -----FUND---"--OBJ-""DESCR IPTION 150 GRANT FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0014 - FROM 12/01/90 TO" 12/31/90 _._.._ -- .. DATE 02/06./91 1 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ' W UNREALIZED EST-REV--MONTRL-REV YEAR I U DA I E BAEAFNCE i 3500'INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE- 351: /OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFET 40,500.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40, 500. 00 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 40, 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 FUND TOTAL 40, 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40, 100. 00 40, 500. 00 40, 50C). 00 40, 500. 00 • O. 0 0. 0 0.0 0 0 a FINANCE -1=A484 49` 15 a 0 FUND OBJ -DESCRIPTION 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 ---- -3100 -TAXES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE :=SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM --42/01790 TO --12/31/90 L'il't_ -./v6/ y1 50.6-4 OF YLAk COMPLE rte UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 3101 -/CURRENT YEAR SECURED 65, 287. 00 21, 681. 32 21, 681. 32 3103 /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 5, 000. 00 0. 00 3, 737. 66 OBJECT SUDTOTAC_ — 70. 287: 00 21, 681. 32-------- -25;41-0: 98 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY — — "3401 — /INTEREST --INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL 2-021. 00 2, 021. 00 20 S0 1, 124. 46 20. 80 1 , 124. 46 43, 605. 68 1, 7,S2. 34 44, 368. 02 896. 54 896. 54 23.2 74.7 36. 1 55. 6 55. 6 TOTALS 72, 308. 00----------217710-.-12 - ._26, 543. 44 45, /o4. 56 7 72, 308. 00 21, 710. 12 26, 543. 44 45, 764. 563 6 FINANCE-FA484 TIME 15:49:15 CITY OF HERMOSA - BEAC1-1 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT • (BY FUND) PAGE 0016 FROM 12/01/90'' TO 12/31/90 - DATE -02/06/9i 50. (Y/. OF• YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED --`FUND'-'- OBJ" DESCRIPTION --_ -- EST REV - 'MONTHLY -REV —YEAH !U DATE ' BALANCE 160 SEWER FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 ---- --- X400 MISE -OF- MONEY" &PROPERTY - 3401 /INTEREST INCOME. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 76, 597. 00 76, 597. 00 9, 200. 64 43, 258. 95 9, 200. 64 43, 258. 95 33, 338. 05 33, 338. 05 3600 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY ;,t 3602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC 4, 000. 00 961. 02 1, 999. 59 2, 000. 41 4: 000. 00- .-961. 02 -1;999. 59 2; 000. 41 "' -- "---OBJECT- SUBTOTAL L+: 4,. 4'7 i, 41, yo 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3626 /SEWER -CONNECTION -FEE 10,-000:00 -` 0. 00 '" -47263796 ` ' 13;736. 04 3829 /SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 1, 300. 00 15. 00 255. 00 1 045. 00 3332 /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 1, 000. 00 75. 1, 990. 00 990. 00 -- OBJECT --SUBTOTAL 20 300: 00 90: 00- - 6; 508. 96 - -- --- 13; 791. 04--.. 56,4 56: 4 49. 9 49. 9 1 `?. u 199. -32.0 - 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3902 7REFUNDS/REIMB-PREY YR 0:-00 -.—...- 0:'00 30.-00 -30. n0-. .' 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 800, 000. 00 66, 666. 67 400, 000. 02 . 399, 999. 98 50. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 800, 000. 00 66, 666. 67 400, 038. 02 399, 961. 98 50. 0 DEPT 0000 5 TOTALS 900; 897. 00 76, 918. 33 451, 805. 52 FUND TOTAL 900, 897. 00 76, 918. 33 451, 805. 52 449, 091. 49 5G 1 449, 091. 40 50. l FINANCE-FA454 -"TIME 15:49: I5"• - " DESCRIPTION CI1Y OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 ---.---3300-FINES & FORFEITURES 3304 /FORFEITED FUNDS 312, 000. 00 14, 370. 70 159, 769. 31 152, 230. 69 51. 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 312, 000. 00 14, 370. 70 159, 769. 31 152, 230. 69 51 2 r:, f :s u n r- 4. .13 7e: 5,1 i 'DATE' 02/06/91 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED EST REV TtUNTHLv-RET1 YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL -- TOTALS 7, 003. 00 64. 53 1, 410. 74 • 5, 592. 26 20. 1 7, 003. 00 — 64753 1,-44074- 5, 592. 26 20. 319, 003. 00 14, 435. 23 161, 180. 05 157,022:95 95 50. 5 319. 003. 00 14, 435. 23 • 161, 180. 05 • 157, 822. 95 50. 5 - CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE- SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) PAGE 0018 'TIME -15:49:15 • " "`" FROM 12/01/90 TO 12/31/90 DATE 02/06/91 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED FUND-- `OBJ --DESCRIPTION EST -REV- -MONTHLY-REV YEAR 1 U AIEE -BALANCE 7 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 --"3400 -USE OF' MONEY-& PROPERTY 16 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3912 OBJECT -SUBTOTAL /FIRE FLOW FEE' 16, 693. 00 16, 693. 00 100, 000. 00 100; 1000 00- 242. 80 - 242. 80 2, 415. 00 '2, 415-00 5, 814. 63 10, 878. 37 34. 5, 814. 63 10, 878. 37 34. 0 126, 135. 24 26, 135. 24- 126. 1 I26;-135724------- — 26; 135724---. 126. 1 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 116, 693. 00 2, 657. 00 131, 949. 07 241 :a FUND TOTAL 116, 693:-00 —27657: 80— -131,-949.-07- -16 7 41. 15, 256. 37- 113 0 i5 256.87-=- 113:0 e FINANCE-FA484 -TIME "15 49: 15' r - --FUND- -00.1 DESCRIPTION r 5 s r O r g s _7 r„ ©.a 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE= 0019 FROM 12./01/9U-70 -12/31/90-------- D7t'fL 02/06%91 • 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 -USE -OF MONEY -I PROPERTY - 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 0. 00 16, 543. 50- 0. 00 0. 00 16, 543. 50- 0. 00 4, 075, 326. 00 4. 075 325 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0 0 46, 206. 08 2, 280, 089. 48 1, 795, 236. 52 55. 9 46. 206. 08 -2,2807089.48 1, 795, 236. 52 _ 55.9 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 4, 075, 326.00 29, 662. 58 2, 280, 089. 48 1, 795, 236. 52 FUND TOTAL 55. —4,-075;32-6:00' ---29,-662 58----- 280;089T-48- 4G'- ---- 1. 795, 236. 52 5i5 9 V FINANCE-FA454 -T7ME 13: 16: 15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 127Y1/90 -TO 12/31/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRXATIOR __- 001 GENERAL FUND 0000 DEPT: 2110 DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 Cl 3900 OTHER REVENUE-- 3903 EVENUE3903 CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1101 CITY COUNCIL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN UBJLUT SVUtUtAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 23,216.00 464. 00 464. 00 ' 1b, '7L5. VV _.__-.BOO. 00 800. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 90, 806. 00 1122 ELECTIONS DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER-SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL O 00. 1, 766. 00 1, 766. 00 100. 00 200. 00 1, 167. 00 600. 00 "2, 067. 00 MONTHLY EXP' YTD EXPND. PAGE 0001 --- 5A1 0272367 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE F_IVC IJMIBRFA(VCE VfVEfVC BALANCE_ is 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 114. 46 0. 00 130. 60 1 0. 00 --'"- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 13, 470. 33 0. 00 1230.9: :=,3t 0. 00 0. 00 4, 154. 08 26, 209. 11 0. 00' 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3; 033. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 765. 50 1, 765. 50 0.00 9. 70 0 _00 0. 00 9.70 1, 943. 64 1, 943. 64 1, 943. 64 1, 943. 64 0. 00 0. 00 Q: QQ 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 1,775 20 O. 00 1, 943. 64- 1, 94a 64- 1, 943. 64- 1, 943. 64- 9, 745. 67 464. 00 . a39. 36- 800. 00 800. 00 O.0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 58. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 64,596 89 28 8 0.00 0 50 0 50 100. 00 190 30 1, 167.00 600. 00 2, 057. 30 2, 007. 00 3 •'I 0.0 99.9 99 9 ,o l 0. 0 an .4. B - ....._.... 0 0 n,k1 0. 0 0.4 nr, nil 46. '1 ;74 • • 3 3 4 6 6 6 0 1 12 is 14 IP •i i • , j F INANCE--FA454 T1ME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR- 001 GENERAL FUND 1121 CITY CLERK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM- r2701/90 'TO 12731790 - • PAGE 0002 -DATE- 02/06/91 50.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE 11 AYPRUPKIATION 74ON I HLY EXP Y i iJ EXPNU ENCUMBRANCE---UNENC- BALANCE DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4100 PERSONAL --SERVICES 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART-TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES' 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 540I EGUIPMENT-LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 656.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 656. 00 0.0 656. 00 0.00 • 0. 00 0. 00 656.00 0.0 - ---I-8; 959700-- - ..-_ -2; 838 55 18, 606. 66 _ _ 0._.00.. .. - - 352.34..._.. _.. 98. 1--- 53, 078. 00 2, 838. 55 . 19, 149. 35 0. 00 33, 928. 65 36. 0 20, 330. 00 20, 330. 00 625. 00 2, 100. 00 270. 00 1, 033. 00 ' 600. 00 "' 9, 700. 00 2, 270. 00 16, 598. 00' 800. 00 800 00 DIVISION. TOTAL 90, 806. 00 1122 ELECTIONS DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE7PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 1, 766. 00 1, 766. 00 100. 00 _-. 200. 00.._. 1, 167. 00 600. 00 • 2, 067. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 3:833.00 0. 00 0. 00 128. 98 128. 98 0. 16 238. 58 69. 59 892. 96 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 .196. 00 0. Od 0. 00 1, 056. 78 4, 469. 24 189. 00 1, 134. 00 1, 315. 53 - 6, 930. 78 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 4, 154. 08 26, 209 11 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 765. 50 1, 765. 50 0. 00 9. 70 0. 00 0. 00 9 70 0. 00 1, 775. 20 0. 00 20, 201. 02 0. 00 20, 201. 02 0. 6 0. 6 0.00 386.42 38. 1 0. 00 1, 207. 04 42. 5 O. 00 270. 00 0.0 0. 00 837. 00 18. 9 '0. 00 600.00 0. 00 5, 230. 76 46. 0 0. 00 1, 136. 00 49. 9 0. 00 9, 667 22 41 7 0. 00 800. 00 0. 0 0. 00 800.'00 0. O 0. 00 64, 596 89 28. 8 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0:`00 0. 00 0. 00 0: '00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 50 0. 50 • 100. 00 190 30 - 1, 167. 00 600. 00 2,057..30 99. 9 99. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 4 2, 057. 80 46. 3 6 ) 6 0 11) 11 18 ;i 16 10 21 23 z.1 3 • • • 1.1 78. FINANCE-FA454 TIME '13:16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1131 CITY ATTORNEY , DEPT: LEGISLATIVE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) --------FRPM-12701790-TIT1.2/31/90 APPROPRIATION.- MONTHLY- Elm -- 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES-. 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE i• ! OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER I 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 43 DIVISION 'TOTAL 115, 000. 00 115, 000. 00 185. 00 310.-00 495.. 00 115, 495. 00 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4112 PART TINE/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES. 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304.TELEPHrINE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 25; 440. 00 25, 440. 00 33, 000. 00 33. 000. 00 185. 00 864. 00 1, 049. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 59, 489. 00 1141 CITY TREASURER DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - 4102 REGULAR-SALARTES7MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 500. 00 288. 00 288. 00 14, 979. 00 5, 586. 68 30, 460. 25 5, 586. 68 30, 460. 25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 133. 38 7. 20 140. 58 5, 586. 68 30, 600. 83 0. 00 0. 00 35. 00- 35. 00- 0. 00 72. 00 72. 00 5, 300. 00 5, 300. 00 .20, 095. 50 20, 095. 50 0. 00 432. 00 432. 00 37. 00 25. 827. 50 '1. 20200 .7,055. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 262. 00 204. 12 0. 00 811. 40 7, 407. 00 44,830.00 2, 464. 00 15, 477 52 2, 000. 00 0. 00 2, 000. 00 " 0. 00 48. 76 48. 76 PAGE 0003 15,41 6270-67171 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X 0. 00 '0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 84, 539. 75 84, 539. 75 51. 62 302. 80 354: 42 26. 4 26. 4 72. 0 2. 28. 4 0. 00 84, 094. 17 26. 4 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 140. 00 20, 140. 00 12, 904. 50 12, 904. 50 185. 00 432. 00 617. 00 0. 00 33, 661. 50 0:00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 21,720.00 295. 88 288. 00 523. 40-- 7, 572. 00 29, 352. 48 1, 951. 24 1, 951. 24 20. 8 20. 8 60. 8 60. 8 0. 0 50. 0 41. 1 43. 4 24.5' 40. 8 0.0 281.7 49.4 34. 5 a 4 71- 0 0 1 I 11 '3 14 1, 17 10 ••, .01 00 67 2.4 2. 4 71 73 74 r 2 3 4 O 6 9 11 12 '3 14 10 111 ,T 16 24 zs 24 3.1 3.1 JP 11. w 41. 411, 41 • 11. 41 42 00 31 117 FINANCE-FA454 TIME -13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR" 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/Q1/90 'TQ'I2731i90'" APPROPR IATION"" "" '" ' "" MONTHLY -EXP.- `YTD` EXPND. 1141 CITY TREASURER- DEPT LEGISLATIVE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP. --7------ . 4316 EMBERSHIP•"'-'""""-- .4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR:OUT-INS-USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1201 CITY MANAGER DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT.SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES. 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING" 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT. SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1202 FINANCE ADMIN DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 785. 00 1, 470. 00 185. 00--- 250.00 500. 00 I; 608:'00 4, 798. 00 51, 628. 00 395, 581. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT • 100, 816. 00 1, 966. 00 • 1, 966. 00 3, 640. 00 108, 388: 00 300. 00 • 300. 00 - 615. 00 1, 650. 00 220. 00-- 135. 00 700. 00 3, 500. 00- 1, 700. 00 5, 227. 00 13, 747. 00 122,435.00 MGMT/SUPPORT 209, 154 00 0. 00 88. 37 0. 00 0. 00 134.00 -.- 222. 37 2, 686. 37 23, 381. 35 9, 622. 46 0.00 1, 574. 40 0. 00 11, 196.86. 0.00 0. 00 0.00 70. 65 0. 00-- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 116. 97 436. 00 623. 62 1.1. 820: 48 17, 910. 23 272. 11 776. 10 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 804. 00 1, 052. 21 17, 378. 49 139, 701. 47 52, 017. 91 0. 00 2, 446. 58 260. 16 54, 724. 65 123.74 123 74 206. 80 1, 044. 15 23.52 3. 19 563. 25 0. 00 268. 94 2, 616. 00. 4, 725 85 59, 574. 24 103, 122. 43 PAGE 0004 DATE' 02706791-'_- 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 2 n ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE-- 0. ALANCE. 0. 00 0. 00 - 0:.00-- 0. 00 0_0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 1, 065. 37 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0: 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 512. 89 693. 90 185: 00. 250. 00 500. 00 804. 00 2, 945. 79 34, 249. 51 254, 814. 16 48, 798. 09 1, 966. 00 480. 5B- 3, 379. 84 53, 663. 35 176.26 176. 26 408. 20 605. 85 196. 48 131. 81 136. 75 3,500.00 1,431.06 2,611.00 9,02/.15 62, 860. 76 106, 031. 57 34: 6 52. 7 0.0 0. 0 50. 0 38. 6 33. 6 35. 5'. 51. 5 0.0 124. 4 7. 1 50.4 41.2 41. 2 33. 6 63. 2 10.6 2. 3 80. 4 0.0 15.8 50. 0 3 3- 48. 6 49. 3 6 7 0 in 12 13 4 IS 16 16 19 20 71 22 24 28 4 II 1, I I. • _ • F 1NANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1202 FINANCE ADMIN DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL -CASH -IN 4112 PART.TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING- "--. 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) P1M-12701/90 T012731/170 APPROPRIATION-- MONTHLY -EXP.- -Y/D EXPND. MGMT/SUPPORT 3, 600. 00 4, 183. 00 4; 1831-00 1, 500. 00 222, 620. 00 66, 095. 00 66, 095. (30. 2, 646. 00 9, 700. 00 250. 00 3; 652. 00 800. 00 8, 639. 00 25, 687. 00 - 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -:-LESS THAN $500 796:00OBJECT SUBTOTAL 796. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 315. 198. 00 1203 PERSONNEL - - DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT-- - 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111. ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART=TImE7TEMPORARY OBJECT -SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACTSERVICES' 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 59. 552. 00 1. 191. 00 1. 191. 00 3, 640. 00 65. 574. 00 13, 600. 00 9, 875. 00 963. 00 0. 00 1, 524. 03 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00- 4; 016. 65 0. 00 143. 55 17, 910. 23 108. 806. 66 0. 00 30, 286 42 O. 00 - '30; 286. 42 5. 99 650. 73 0. 00 110. 00 265. 32 720. 00 822. 23 4. 782. 34 165. 00 1, 112. 04 435. 32 4, 320_ 00 1, 752. 04- .11, 636. 93 0. 00----- - 396. 05 0. 00 396. 05 19. 662. 27 4, 873. 58 0. 00 0. 00 151, 126. 06 27,249.53 0 00 957.60 0. 00 .127.16 4, 873. 58 28, 334. 29 0. 00 4, 955. 08 0. 00 445. 00 0. 00 -5. 400. 08 8. 09 435. 84 PAGE 0005 !JAYE 02/06/91 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENtUMBNANdt " .UNENcIJALANdt 0. 00 2. 075. 97 0. 00 4, 183. 00 01•00 166. 35 0. 00 1, 356. 45 0. 00 113, 013. 34 0. 00 -O. 00 0. 00 26. 21 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 ' 26:2f 99. 09 89. 09 2 3 10 42.3 0.0 I .5 96:0 9.5 48.8 35, 308. 58 45_ 8 35, 800. 58 45. 1, 823. 77 4. 391. 45 05. 00 2, 539. 96 364. 68 4.319. 00 14, 023. 86 310. 86 310. 86 115. 30 163, 956. 64 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 .0. 00 0. 00 31.0 49. 5 66. 0 30.4 54. 4 50. 0 45.4 60.9 60. 9 47. 9 32, 302. 47 45. 7 1, 191. 00 0. 0 233. 40 80. 4 3, 512. 84 3. 4 37, 239. 71 43. 2 8, 644. 92 9. 430. 00 18, 074. 92 :36. 4 4. 23.6- 527. 16 45. 2 .1 .1., 0.? 414 n.; 44 At, •r, !A 4 - Ar 2 .40 401 S 411, 40, t e s 10 11 12 19 14 15 12 n IB 19 20 21 22 23 14 22 20 27 113 39 30 21 32 2) 34 30 37 3k ' 39 60 42 43 44 45 .b IC EI l,2 a2 214 Bb 59 n- FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1203 PERSONNEL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) -FROM-12/01/90 T0-12/31790 PAGE 0006 - DATE 02/06/91_..------x- 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION."" MONTHLY -EXP ---"-YTD "EXPND. EN-CUMBR-ANCE........UNENC DALANCF 7. DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIESTOTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING' .. `""-" .. 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4320 MEDICAL EXAMS 4327 AGMD"'INCENTIVES 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 5, 200. 00 650. 00 3,595.00 915. 00 15. 500. 00 3. 200: 00- 2. 172. 00 32, 195. 00 232. 10 0. 00' 395. OCT- --' O. 00 237. 00 3: 200. 00 181. 00 4, 253. 19 121, 244. 00 9, 126. 77 1205 CABLE TV DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL-bhKVICES--- 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL -CASH IN -- 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER `4305 OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES ._ 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL" 1206 DATA PROCESSING. DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR -OVERTIME 26, 000. 00 520. 00 520. 00' 2, 700. 00 29, 740. 00 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 700: 00` 1, 000. 00 400. 00 350. 00 500. 00 1, 07B. 00 4, 028. 00 2, 022. 46 0. 00 0. 00 98. 00 2, 120. 46 2, 970. 30 572. 50 355. 00 602. 00 3. 010. 00 O. OO 1, 086. 00 9, 031. 64 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0: 00 0. 00 O. 00 42, 766. 01 0. 00 10, 880. 60 0. 00 0.00 773. 50 11, 654. 10 2, 229:70 57. 1 77. 50 BB. 0 3, 240. 00 9. 8 313. 00 65. 7 12, 490. 00 19. 4 3, 200. 00.. 0. 0 1 086. 00 50. 0 23, 163. 36 28. O 78, 477, 99 35. 2 0. 00 15, 119. 40 0. 00 520. 00 0. 00 520. 00 0. 00 1, 926. 50 0. 00 18, 085. 90 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6. 18 .- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00"- O. 00 90. 00 96. 18 38, 768. 00 2, 216. 64 MGMT/SUPPORT 79, 264. 00 5, 734. 16 '250. 02 0. 00 60. 00 0. 00 0. 00 540. 00 850. 02 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 85. 00 0. 00 0. 00 85. 00 12, 504. 12 85. 00 34, 443. 95 -. 267. 83 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 449. 98 1, 000. 00 340. 00 265. 00 5C)0. 00 538. 00 3, 092. 98 41. 8 0. 0 0. 0 28, 6 39. 1 0.0 0. 0 2 3 4 0 In 12 • 9 Iii 19 21 22 n try 26, 178. 8N 32. 4 O. 00 • 44, 820. 05 " 43. 4 0.00 232. 17 53.5 F INANCE-FA454 "TIME' 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1206 DATA PROCESSING CITY OF'HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) QOM" -12701 /90 'LO _i273i790 ._ .._ .. APPROPR IATIO'T MONTHLY -EXP-- -Y11) EXPND. DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATER IALS7SUPPLIES7OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS_ 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE -EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT=MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1, 779. 00 1. 779. 00 B3, 322. 00 93, 451. 00 93, 451. 00 2, 568. 00 11, 348. 00 2, 200.. 00 830. 00 69. 00 1.; 300: 00 --- 2, 926. 00 21, 291. 00 0. 00 95, 0035. 00 95, 000. 00 293, 064. 00 1207 BUS LICENSE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 79,979.00 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1,600.00 41.11 ACCRUAL- CASH IN -U-600: 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 83, 679. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT. SUBTOTAL- --- 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 29. 00 160. 00 189: 00 375. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 094. 20 5, 826. B8 36; 805. 98 2, 530. 00 2, 530. 00 43. 68 36. 56 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 18. 45--- 244. 00 342. 69 0. 00 0:00- 0. 00 8, 699. 57 6, 591. 42- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 591. 42 0..00 0. 00 32, 926. 54 32, 926. 54 1, 480. 02 3, 059. 20 0. 00 200. 00 166. 2_1 173.45 1, 464. 00 6, 542. 88 437. 68 0.00 437. 68 76, 713. 08 38, 883. 01 0. 00 0. 00 445. 95 39, 328. 96 19. 78 38. 03 238. 44 PAGE 0007 OATE' 0 7Zi6��i 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0.`00 0. 00 -0-00. 1, 805. 00 1, 805. 00 0. 00 115. 33 0. 00 0.. 00 0...00 0. 00 0. 00 115. 33 201. 76 0.00 201. 76 2, 122. 09 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 779. 00 315. 20- 46, 516. 02 0.0 117. 7 44. 1. 58. 719. 46 , 37. 1. 58, '7,1 9. 46 37. .1 1, 087.98 8, 173. 47 2, 200. 00 630. 00 97. 21-- 1, 176. 55 1, 462. 00 14, 632. 79 639. 44- 95, 000. 00 94, 360. 56 57. 6 27. 9 0. 0 24. 0 240. 8 12. 8 - 50. 0 31. 2 0. 0 0. 0 0. 6 214, 228. 83 26. 9 41, 095, 99 500. 00 1, 600. 00 i, 154. 05 44, 350. 04 9. 22 121. 97 13/.19 136. 56 48. 6 0. 0 - 0. 0 27. 8 46. 9 68. 2 23. 7 63. 5 32(. 4 g.. 0 0 iz I6 1A 21 JJ 2. n 5/7 61 65 66 6' 50 1 IJ 74 F INANCE-FA454 , TIME 13: 16: 15 Ir.l - .,I 4wi 44 .1, 4.J 61 • 1 • t- • FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1207 BUS LICENSE' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) - FROM -,12/01/90 T0-12731790 APPROPRIATION'" DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300.'MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES ' 4311 AUTO -MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1208 GEN APPROP 4; 380. 00 286. 00 - 105.00' 50. 00 850. 00 • 700: 00 4, 520. 00 11, 266. 00 95, 134. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100' PERSONAL'SERVICES" 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 411I ACCRUAL -CASH IN " 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRAOT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE ."_.- 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT=INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401•EQUIPtMENT-LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $300 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS. 6900 LEASE -PAYMENTS " OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26, 312. 00 526. 00 526: 00 0. 00 27, 364. 00 15, 600. 00 15, 600. 00 300. 00 200. 00 . 1," 152: 00'.' 1, 920. 00. 100. 00 5. 200. 00 • 5, 300: 00 '22; 970: 00 22, 970. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 73. 154. 00 44 46./-59-774474.7754,49Z+94,..99.944e�ikNS66C45)4.3it,,79t4.4,7?+ }tEgw. g .NJf )41) w?9. 2.+49+4)Y5 T 4444444U <,.::,r,4,l(Z.a'.e:.f�,."�i�'K):a`d==tra5N;t?.w-.......,:>7a?&,......... ,-i_.a> .... _. .. .. .._ MONTHLY''EXP-."'... 'YTD' EXPND. 211. 29 13. 91 0. 00-- 0. 00 0_0.00 0. 00 377. 00 602. 20 1, 985. 61 78. 17 12. 00 40. 00 298. 61 388. 40 2, 262. 00 5, 303. 23 7, 193. 62 44, 690. 00 0. 00 9, 526. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1 , 21 1. 44 2, 977. 57 1, 211. 44 12, 503. 57 195. 00 5, 880. 06 195. 00 5, 880. 06. 0.00' " - ' 113.88 1, 455. 58- 24. 151. 33- O. 00 0. 00 96. 00--- - 576. 00 1, 359. 58- 23, 461. 45- 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 89. 67 O. 00 89 67 0. 00 T 7; 532. 40 0. 00 7, 532. 40 46. 86 PAGE '0008 -- DATE' 02706791-- 50:0% OF. YEAR COMPLETE .2 ENCUMBRANCE ' UNENC BALANCE- T, 0. 00 2, 394. 39 0. 00 2.07. 83 0. 00 9.3. 00 0. 00 10. 00 98. 00 ' 453. 39 0.00 311. 60 0. 00 2, 258. 00 9B. 00 - 5, 864. 77 98. 00 50, 346. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 2, 544. 25 0. 00 16, 786. 00 526. 00 526. 00 2, 977. 57-- 14, 860. 43 9, 719. 94 9, 719. 94 - 154. 12 24, 451. 33 200. 00 .576.06: 25, 381. 45 10. 33 5, 200. 00 - 5,210.33 15, 437. 60 15, 437. 60 45.3 27. 3 11.4. BO. 0 46. 6 55. 4 50. 0 47. 9 47. 0 36. 2 0. 0 0.'0 0. 0 45. 6 37. 6 37. 6 '42.4 8050. 4 0.0 30:5- 1221.9 50: 01221.9 89. 6 0. 0 1. 6 32. 7 32. 7 70, 609. 75 3. 4 4 5 6 2 0 1 77 2 1, 4 1., Iq '9 2(! 21 2.) 26 27 :11 1 i4 7,1 1. 6M1 66 67 ii • I .") F I NANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009 FROM -12/01/90 --10-1273.1790- • • • 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION • MONTHLY exp' YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND _. . ____ . . ....._____..... .. 1212 EMP BENEFITS . DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1213 RETIREMENT 4100 PERSONAL -SERVICES 4180 RETIREMENT . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 670, 458. 00 670, 458. 00 670, 458. 00 DEPT: MGMT /SUPPORT 48, 368. 78 272, 161. 27 48, 368. 78 272, 161. 27 48, 368. 78 272, 161. 27 858, 463. 00 70, 400. 01 351, 426. 89 858, 463. 00 70, 400. 01 351, 426. 89 DIVISION TOTAL 858, 463. 00 70, 400. 01 351, 426. 89 1214 PROSP EXP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4322 UNCLASSIFIED. 4397 2.57. ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER 127, 388. 00 254, 757. 00- - 127, 369. 00- 127, 369. 00 - DEP T: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2101 POLICE 151, 474. 00 151, 474. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 4, 083. 33, 4, 083. 33' 0. 00 398, 296. 73 0. 00 398, 296. 73 40. 5 40. 5 0. 00 398, 296. 73 40. 5 0. 00 0. 00 507, 036. 11 507, 036. 11 0. 00 507, 036. 11 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 127, 388. 00 254, 757. 00- 127, 369. 00- 40. 9 . 40. 9 40.9 0.0 0. 0 O. 0 0. 00 127, 369. 00- 0. 0 126, 973. 98 0. 00 126, 973. 98 0. 00 4,083:33-- 126,973.98 24, 500. 02 24, 500. 02 83. 8 33. 0. 00 24, 500. 02 03 2, 612, 023. 00 181, 618. 33 1, 140, 479. 90 2, 420. 39 1, 469, 122. 71 43. 7 . . DEPT: POLICE 4100 PERSONAL-ZERVICES--- 4102 REGULAR SALAR ES/ MI SC 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 579, 135. 00 1, 626, 990. 00 22; 560. 00 43, 143. 10 133, 944. 38 1, 880. 00 259, 919. 41 804, 820. 46 11, 280. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 319, 215. 59 822, 169. 54 11, 2130. 00 44. 8 49. 4 150. 3 7 a 1 I? I 113 :50 9 551.1 1. FINANCE-FA454 . TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2101 POLICE rf 61 e1 DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 4109 COURT 'TIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4114 POLICE RESERVES 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4118 FIELD-'TRAIN_ING OFFICER 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4306 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE ,-POST 4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TP.SFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE. THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) `- FROM '12/01 /90 TO -12/31/90 APPROPRIATION - POLICE . 20, 000. 00 96, 000. 00 20. 000. 00 44. 574. 00 44, 574. 00 21. 000. 00 24, 000. 00 9, 065. 00 9; 000: 00 ' 38, 500. 00 2, 555. 398. 00 110. 437. 00 35. 229. 00 145, 666. 00 0. 00 28, 890. 00 36, 000. 00 10, 160. 00 3, 000. 00 -'7, 500. 00 19, 250. 00 22, 000. 00 '21, 900. 00 8. 500. 00 1, 660. 00 14, 000. 00 4, 500. 00 333, 904. 00 510, 864. 00 550. 00 30, 086. 00 30, 636. 00 134. 626. 00 '134, 626. 00 MONTHLY"' EXP -YTD EXPND. 4, 706. 36 6, 126. 42 64.98 0. 00 3. 259. 50 0. 00 612. 00 475. 43 585. 62 2. 196.10 196, 993. 09 28. 248. 74 71, 625. 99 5, 322. 76 2, 939. 67 16, 263. 12 0. 00 9, 161. 50 3, 562. 04 -2. 803. 08 16, 513. 30 1. 232. 460. 07 482. 78 34, 158. 93 446. 28 1, 510. 05 929. 06 35, 660. 98 24. 36 348. 72 1, 265. 99 14, 036. 81 1, 495. 57" 18, 017. 64 5. 64 3, 104. 90 0. 00 1, 215. 31 41.71 -2, 230. 33 2, 496. 28 14, 066. 08 70. 88 12. 144. 04 430. 72 15, 984. 28 528. 54- 552. 49 0.00 175.00 638. 50` -6, 392. 94 0. 00 100. 00 27, 823. 00 166, 938" 00 33, 764. 11 .... -. 255, 306. 54 0. 00 2. 312 06 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 312. 86 0. 00 51, 337. 31 O. 00 51, 337. 31 PAGE 0010 DATE 02/06191'----.--1 50. 0`/. OF YEAR COMPLETE 2 3 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0"'00 0.00 400. 31 400, 31 285. 00 0. 00 265. 00 0. 00 250. 00 83. 26 0. 00 1, 175. 41 0. 00 - O. 00 1, 805. 39 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 3, 314. 06 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 8, 248. 74- 24, 374. 01 14, 677. 24 41, 634. 33 28. 310. 88 21, 000. 00 14, 838. 50 5. 502. 96 -6, 196. 92 21, 586. 39 1 , 322, 537..62 75, 993. 07 33, 718. 95 109, 712..02 348. 72- 14. 603. 19 17, 899. 10 7, 055. 10 609. 28 5, 269. 67 5, 183. 92 8, 050. 57 5, 515. 72 7, 947. 51 1. 485. 00 7. 607. 06 4, 400. 00 166. 966. 00 252, 243. 40 1, 762. 86- 30, 086. 00 28, 323. 14 83. 208. 69 83, 208. 69 141. 2 74. 6 26. 6. _ 6. 5 36. 4 0.0 38. 1 39. 2 31.1 43.9 18. 2 31. 1 4. 2 24. 6 0. 0 49. 4 50. 2 30. 5 79. 6 29. 1 73. 0 63. 4 74. 3 6. 4 10. 5 45.6 49.9 50. 6 420.5 0. 0 7 5. 38. 1 n8. 1" _.. • ' 1, IA ,i 1AQ rn 22 21 24 2.4 PI n _7 tio F I NANCE--FA 4 54 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2201 FIRE DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES ,4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4108 FLSA OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK-PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4119 FITNESS INCENTIVE 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT -SERVICES -"- 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE"OPER SUPPLIES" 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE'EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 'EQUIP.MENT=MORE -THAN ' $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE -PAYMENTS -- 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1. ..._. .. ... ._ DEPARTMENT TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM -12%01 /90 TO 12731790 • APPROPRIATION 3, 377, 190. 00 3, 377, 190. 00 FIRE 43, 789. 00 857:- 791. 00 99, 500. 00 60, 255. 00 I8, 032- 00 IS, 032. 00 0. 00 9, 040. 00 1, 105, 439. 00 21, 718. 00 21, 718. 00 3, 750. 00 -..--3; 900: 00 7, 000. 00 3, 080. 00 1, 000. 00 650. 00 2, 500. 00 ..-2;'000:- 00- 91, 210. 00 114, 990. 00 1, 900. 00 -2, 100. 00 4. 000: 00 82, 541. 00. 82, 541. 00 MONTHLY -EV ---Yin EXPND. 231, 687. 06 1, 577. 085. 76 231, 687. 06 1, 577, 085. 76 3,694.50 75, 068. 36 5, 367. 37 3, 922. 73 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 378. 00 88, 430. 96 21, 272. 00 453; 246. 17 60, 725. 54 31, 489. 64 0. 00 29, 170. 41 2, 400. 00 3, 103. 71 601, 409. 47 157. 19 14, 933. 72 157. 19 14, 933. 72 I6B. 4B 1, 188. 53 89. 09 - 1; 396. 46 112.94 54. 29 0.00. 0. 00 50. 00 2, 015. 25 456. 47 333. 88 350. 00 162. BO 265.69 7, 601. 00 45, 606. 00 8, 075. 80. 51, 775. 08 1. 0. 00 988. 47 0. 00-.--. --"-- 3; 880. 22 0. 00 4, 868. 69 0. 00 25, 239. 30 0. 00 23.239. 30 1, 328, 688. 00 96, 663. 95 1, 328, 688. 00 96, 663. 95 698, 226. 26 698, 226. 26 PAGE 0011 'DATE-0270-679i-- 50.0% MTE"0270b793"__...__-- 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUFiBRM E UNENC BALANCE 3,999.37 1, 796, 104. 87 3, 999. 37 1, 796, 104. 87 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 22, 517. 00 404, 542. 83 36, 774. 46 26, 765. 36 10. 032. 00 11, 138. 41- 2, 400. 00-- 4, 936. 29 504, 029. 53 6,784.28 6,784.28 2, 561. 47 -2,403.54 4, 984. 75 2, 623. 53 666. 12 300. 00 2, 337. 20 1._ 734. 31 45, 604. 00 63, 214. 92 911.53 1, 780. 22- 868. 69- 57, 301. 70 7, 301. '70 630, 461. 74 630, 461. 74 46. 8 46. 0 4 5 7 10 i, iz 3 ,9 28. 7 14. 8 33. 3 53. 8 6. 5 50.0 45. 0 52. 0 184.7 121.7 30. 5 30. 52. 5 52. 5 43 44 ei FR 1" 47 RI 54 n- 99 97 RN Io 71 72 )4 7 F INANCE--FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR CITY OF HERMOSA.BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT. (BY FUND) - FROM -"12701/90 TO -12/31790 PAGE • 0012 - DATE 02706791 --- 50.07 OF YEAR COMPLETE 2 APPROPRIATION' - "MONTHLY --EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE • UNENC BALANCE'-- " 7. 001 GENERAL FUND 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN x ii c c A, F,i.$"i++a � . 4100 PERSONAL` SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATIDN7SICK'PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4107 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316_ TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS' THAN- $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE -PAYMENTS --- 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 96, 342, 00 1, 000 00. 1,927:00 - 1, 927. 00 500. 00 500. 00 102, 196. 00 1, 900. 00 6. 000. 00 7, 900. 00 700: 00 1, 800. 00 800. 00 1, 540. 00 2, 500. 00 50. C)0 350. 00 550. 00 11, 559. 00 19; 849. 00 _. 1,000.00 1, 000. 00 714. 00 714. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 131, 659. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 131, 659. 00 7, 901. 16 270I CIVIL DEFENSE"- DEPT:. 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4iO3 REGULAR- SALARIES/SAFETY "-24782E. 00- -2, 201762 -._- -13; 209. i2 6, 637. 94 8. 63 21.22 0. 00 18.76 6, 686. 55 83. 85 0. 00 83. 85 2. 25 0. 00 165. 51 .. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 963. 00 I. 130. 76 42, 290. 93 538. 38 0. 00 1, 677. 76 253. 35 112. 56 44. 972. 98 867. 04 2. 283. 01 3, 150. 05 246. 08 1,.029. 69 24. 63 966. 58 591. 33 0. 00 0. 00 121. 95 5, 778. 00 B, 758. 26 0. 00 0. 00 0.-00 0. 00 0. 00 0: 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0: 00 0. 00 O. 00 0.00 110. 49 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 110. 49 0. 00 50. 00- . . _.. 0. 00 50. 00- O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 901. 16 280. 75 280. 75 57, 012.,04 57, 012. 04 0. 00 0. 00 110. 49 54, 051. 07 461. 62 1, 927. 00 249. 24 246.65 387. 44 57, 323. 02 1, 032. 96 3, 716. 99 4, 749. 95 453. 92 770. 31. 775. 37 573. 42 1, 798. 18 50. 00 350. 00 428. 05 5, 781. 00 10, 920. 25 1', 050. 00 1, 050. 00 433. 25 433. 25 43. 8 53. 8 0: 0_. 87. 0 50. 6 22.5_ 43. 9 45. 6 38. 0 39. 8 35. 1 57. 2 3.0 62. 7 28. 0 0. 0 0.0 22. I 49.9 44.6 5.-0-- 5. 0 -0-- 5.0 39. 3 39. 3 74, 536.47 43.3 110. 49 74, 536. 47 43. 3 -00 11. bib. 88 53. 2-_. s e 7 0 2 '5 14 1♦ 1,. 1!1 19 54 45 40 47 45 49 no- 51 52 5, �n en fiq )n • i3 ., e • xa`;,; .64 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) -PR0W-12701/90 "TO -1273 r790 APPROPRIATION- MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. DEPT: DISASTER PREP 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4107 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL- 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EGUIPMENT-MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 497. 00 497. 00 285. 00 26, 105. 00 0. 00 2, 800. 00 " 2, 800. 00 3, 725 00 600. 00 3, 600. 00 -2, 319. 00 10, 244. 00 1, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 6, 000. 00 45. 149. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL ' 45,149.00 3101 MEDIANS DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES - 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME - 4110 VACATION/SICK-PAY-OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT-SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 43C)3 UTILITIES 50, 847. 00 300. 00 017. 1.017. 00 53, 181. 00 47,630.00 1, -260 00 48, 690. 00 9, 027. 00 0. 00 0. 00 14. 58 2, 216. 10 325.60 0. 00 325.60----- 0. 00 0. 00 87. 48 13, 296. 60 2, 295. 43 0. 00 2, 295. 43 0. 00 129. 64 0.00 0.00 0. 00 480. 00 193. 00 1-, 158. 00 193. 00 1, 767. 64 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 734. 70 2, 734. 70 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 359. 67 17,359.67 4,204.20 24,497.39 0.00 25 43 0. 00- O. 00 356.97- 1,134.90 3,847.23 25, 657. 72 . _ 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 12,810.36 0. 00 12, 810. 36 558. 36 3, 106 23 PAGE, 0013 DAT 5 0220679T 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE .DNENC bALANdt 0. 00 497. 00 0.0 0. 00 497. 00 00 0. 00 197.52 30. 6 0. 00 12, 808. 40 50. 9 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00- 2, 295. 43- 0. 0 2, BOO. 00 0. 0 504. 57 81. 9 0.00 3,595.36 3. 4 0. 00 600. 00 0. 0 0. 00 3, 120. 00 . 13. 3 0. 00 1, 161. 00 49.1 0. 00 8. 476. 36 17. 2 O. 00 1, 000. 00 0.0 0. 00 5, 000. 00 0.0 0. 00 6, 000. 00 0.0 - 0. 00 27, 789. 33 38. 4 0. 00 27, 789. 33 38. 4 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 26, 349. 61 40. 1 274. 57 8. 4 f, 017. 00 0.0 117.90- 111.5 27,523.28 48.2 352.00 34,467.64 U. 00 1, 260. 00 352. 00 35, 727. 64 0,00 5, 920. 77 27. 6 O. 0 26. 9 34.4 4 5 0 6.4 65 6 7 A 41) 1 I • IA IA (14 16 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR' 001 GENERAL FUND 3101 MEDIANS CITY OF HERMOSA"BEACH. EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND). PAGE' 0014 FROM -"12701/90 -TO-12131790 DATE:02/06/91-7 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY -EXP -------.YTD EXPND. DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND•LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER_CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL. DIVISION TOTAL 6, 000. 00 660.00 500. 00 4, 686. 00 20, 873. 00 500. 00 I; 500. 00" 2. 000. 00 939. 40 2.26 0. 00 391. 00 1, 891. 02 0. 00 0. 00'- 0. 00 124, 944. 00 5, 738. 25 3103 ST MAINTENANCE DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT -SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT -SUBTOTAL '' 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING - 4396 TRSFR"OUT-INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT --MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 155, 214. 00 500. 00 3, 104. 00 -3, 104. 00' 161, 922. 00 82, 977. 00 1. 200. 00 84, 177: "00 '' -I4; BOO. 00 4, 180. 00 13, 500. 00 53, 324. 00 86, 404. 00 200. 00 2, 800. 00 3, 000.00 20, 844. 00 12, 956. 20 0. 00 0. 00 12, 956. 20 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 240. 19'257. 58 0. 00 0. 00- -- 4, 444. 00 4,941.77 0. 00 0. 00 1, 189 54 10. 61 465. 05 2. 346. 00 7, 117. 43 162. 26 0. 00 162. 26 ENCUMBRANCE---'--1NENC - BALANCE 240. 19 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 240. 19 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ' 45, 747. 77 592. 19 75. 667. 34 0. 00 0. 00 - 2, 573. 28 78, 240. 62 24, 134. 97 100. 00 24; 234. 97 4; 719: 10 2, 034: 23 3;512_.44 0.00 26, 664. 00 36, 929. 77 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10. 420. b8 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ''0:00 0. 00 210. 00 0. 00 210. 00 -0.00 0. 00 822. 36 0. 00 0. 00 822. 36 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 570. 27 649. 39 34. 95 2, 340. 00 13. 515. 38 337. 74 i; 500:00 1, 837. 74 23. 8 1. 6 93. 0 50. 0 35. 2 32. 4 O:O.,. 8: 1 78, 604. 04 37. 0 79, 546. 66 500. 00 3, 104. 00 510. 72 B3,681.38 58, 632. 03 1, 100. 00 59, 732. 03 10, 080. 90 2. 145. 77 9, 165. 20 600. 00 26, 660. 00 48.7 0.0 0. 0 82:9 - --- 48. 3 29. 3 8. 3 29.0 3i.8 48. 6 32. 1 0 O 50. 0 48, 651. 87 43. 6 200. 00 2, 800. 00 3, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 10, 423. 32 49. 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 23 76 27 14 41 AA 59 5. 53 7. 5e 60 ei n4 67 74 75 • R:.rs1:,Y4'�H'P`dR.SAYil'R: ; 1«!�'✓rfw+bA3A6e T$SW'.r� .- S4i,hvJaL' "4 4N .4 /I 3 CJ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) "-' TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR - 001 GENERAL FUND 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS. OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL - -- "FRUM T 70i/90 TO 12731790--- - PAGE 0015 DATE 02%0691 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION ... MONTHLY EXE VT'D EXPND. ENCUMDRANCE UNENC QALANCE 20, 844. 00 0. 00 356, 347. 00 17, 897. 97 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL. SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL -CASH IN' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201' CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL-. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO- MAINTENANCE' 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINIIIG 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 106, 327: 00 500. 00 2, 127. 00 -2; 127. 00 "- 111, 111, 081. 00 15, 000. 00 8, 117. 00 23, 117. 00 6, 180. 00 36, 000. 00 1, 430. 00 1. 200. 00- _ 200. 00 300. 00 9, 401.00 54, 711. 00 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 2,380.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2,380.00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS • 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS -OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 096. 00 "- 10, 096. 00 DIVISION TOTAL ' 201,385:00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 682, 676. 00 • 4101 PLANNING 4100 PERSONAL"SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC DEPT: PLANNING 195, 156. 00 10, 420. 68 0. 00 149, 826. 04 1. 032. 36 7, 836. 77 45, 169. 46 0.00 162.70 0. 00 0. 00 0. _ 2. 103.81 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 423. 32 49. 9 205, 488: 60 42. 3 61, 157. 54 337. 30 2, 127. 00 .0. 00.. - 23. 19 42. 4 32. 5 0. 0 98.9 7, 836. 77 47, 435. 97 0. 00 63, 645. 03 42. 7 1, 075. 00 0. 00 1, 075. 00 - 0. 0b- 530. 07 128. 18 185. 0. 00 0. 00 783. 00 1, 626. 25 3, 175. 00 32. 85- 3; 142. 15 2, 135. 32 30, 107. 96 860. 69 202. 56 60. 00 0. 00 4, 698. 00 38, 064. 53 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 4, 646. 21 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4,646.21 11, 825. 00 21. 1 8, 149. 85 0. 4 19, 974. 85 13. 5 4, 044. 68 34. 5 1, 245. 83 96. 5 569. 31 60. 1 997.44 i 6. 8 140. 00 - 30. 0 300. 00 0. 0 4, 703. 00 49. 9 12, 000. 26 78. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2.380. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 380. 00 0. 0 0. 00 5, 047. 74 0. 00 5, 048. 26 49. 9 0. 00` '-_.- 5, 047. 74 '0. 00 5, 048. 26 49. 9 10, 538. 02 - 93. 690 39 4, 646. 21 103, 048. 40 4E3. E3 34, 174. 24 289, 264. 20 6, 2_70. 76 387, 141. 04 43. 2 1 1. 387. 52 70, 898. 89 0. 00 124, 257.31 36.3 0 1.5 IN 22 .,c ,( 40 y0 11 7/1 nO ie FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR•' 001 GENERAL FUND 4101 PLANNING 110 • 4•, .47 K6 DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL -SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL'CASH'IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ;4304 TELEPHONE' 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LURES 4311 AUTO -MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION' 'TOTAL - 4102 PLANNING COMM 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) - 'FROM' 12101 /90 TO-1273I/90.- APPROPRIATION-7 O-"12735790" APPROPRIATION' PLANNING 300. 00. 4. 188. 00 4. 188. 00 22, 020. 00 225. 852. 00 62, 000. 00 62i-000. 00 1.712. 15, 500. 220. ...600. 825. 1,800. 1,250. 9,616. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 31. 523. 00 400. 00 400. 00 319;'775: 00 DEPT: PLANNING 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER'SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL- ---- DIVISION' ' ... DIVISION' -TOTAL-- 6, 000. 00 6,- 000. 00 5 000. 00. 204. 00 1, 200. 00 MONTHLY -EXP__..- -YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00..... 3. 200. 95 14, 588. 47 0.00 2. 27 382. 46 0. 00 0. OCT 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 - 801. 00 1.185. 73 0. 00 0. 00 9.20 44.13 2. 013. 35 19, 303. 48 92, 268. 85 199. 55 199. 55 869. 55 4, 031. 39 58. 06 1, 240. 85 240. 00 310. 7B 140 00 4, B06. C)0 11, '704 63 5. 06 5 06 15. 774. 20 104, 178. 09 714. 00 714. 00. 2. 125.00 2, 125. 00 202. 54'---- - 1, 773. 61 11. 75 38. 44 0. 00 0. 00 214: 812. 05 '12; --4021. 00___..... .--- 928: 39--._ - 3, 937. 05 PAGE 0016 DATE- 0270b/9 r -- - ---- 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE._ . UNENC BALANCE. - 0. 00 ALANCE. 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00. 0. 00' ._..0: 00 0. 00 1.47. '74 0. 00 0.00" 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 147. 74 0. 00 0. 00 147:74 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2.90. 00 4,143.87 2. 174. 65 2, 716. 52 133, 583. 15 61, 800. 45 61, 800. 45 842. 11,320. 161. 640. 585. 1, 481. 1. 110. 4, 810. 19, 670. 45 87 • 94 85- 00 22 00 00 63 394. 94 394.94 215,449.17 3, 875. 00 3, 075. 00 3.0 1.0 48.0 87. 6 40. 8 0.3 0.3 - 50. 7 26. 9 26.3 206:.8 --- 29. 0 17. 7 11. 2 49. 9 37.5 1. 2 1. 2 32: 6-- 35.4 35.4 :15.4 .. 3,226.39 35.4 165. 56 18. 8 1,200.00 0.0 '4, 591..95'. 28:2- 8, 466.-95 2 3 4 I6 I� 20 2.1 J3 24 25 26 2.7 32. 3, 40 4i 40 40 49 50 51 52 53 54 Set 5-7 50 SP 60 0I 82 63 64 65 67 611 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 70 lr • • • % is '• si'"t�2,ii{j{�A. Vf1y;EYP7+p+w'eYdRsw.4,e1]O�n3!wlMki - M1kSs',N4'/+4e 0 • On • I • •• • • I ' F INANCE-F6454 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 13:16:15 FROMY2701/90 TO 12/31/90 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4201 BUILDING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR'SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL PAGE 0017 DATE 02/06/91 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION- - MONTHLYIE505- YTO EXPND. ENCURbOANdt UNENC BALANCE 332, 179. 00 DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4200 CONTRACT -SERVICES-. 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE' -. • 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LURES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUbTOTAL 16, 702. 49 108, 115. 14 241.390. 00- 19, 426. 77- I01, 672. 08 500. 00 4, 828. 00 4; 82e 00 251, 546. 00 55, 827. 00 890. 00 56, 717. 00 0. 00 747. 90 0.00 19, 174. 67 17. 863. 82 0. 00 17, 863. 82 -2; 46 I. •-• 12. 40 6, 825. 00 578. 00 525..00- 365. 00 3, 000. 00 500.00 31, 090. 00 46, 344. 00 330. 11 30. 06 0. 00 150. 00 125. 00 0:00 2, 591. 00 3, 238. 57 0. 00 3, 131. 86 1, 337. 85 106, 142. 59 28, 383. 89 0. 00 28, 393. 09 988. 87 2, 805. 52. 540. 73 134.00 250. 00 544. 00 0. 00 15. 546. 00 20. 809. 12 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQU I PMENT-LESS THAN $500 700. 00 0. 00 O. 00 5403 VEHICLES-- __ -11, 000. 00- - -7. 9, 707. 64 - ------ 9, 707. 64 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 11, 700. 00 9, 707. 64 9, 707. 64 DIVISION TOTAL 366, 307. 00 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN- DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 191, 877. 00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 3, 838. 00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 3, 838. 00 4187 UN/FORMS- ' - - - 7;210:00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 206, 763. 00 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERV I CE / PR I VA TE 3, 000. 00 49, 984. 70 165, 043. 24 13,467.84 ' 86,801.35 0. 00 63 40 0. 00 337. 02 2041. 89 13, 467. 84 89, 243. 66 • 0. 00 192. 28 147.74 223,916.12 O. 00 - 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 347. 54 0. 00 6, 347. 54 0.00 ' 107. 70 0. 00 0. 00 467. 77 O. 00 - O. 00 575. 47 0. 00 0. 00 • 6, 923. 01 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 139.717.12 500. 00 1, 696. 14 3.490.15 145,403.41 32. 5 0.0 64. 8 27 7 42. 1 21, 095. 57 62.2 890. 00 0. 0 21, 985. 57 61. 2 1.472. 13 40. 1 3, 911. 78 42: 6 37. 27 93. 5 391. 00 25. 5 115. 00 68. 4 1, 988. 23 33. 7 1. 500. 00 0.0 15, 544. 00 50. 0 24, 959. 41 46. 1 700. 00 O. 0 29"2. 36 • Ga. C-.5 1, 992. 36 82. 9 194, 340. 75 46. 9 105, 075. 65 45. 3, 774. 60 1.6 3, 500. 98 8. 7 5, 168. 1.1 28.3 117, 519. 34 43. 1 0. 00 2. 807. 72 6. 4 23 A 13 1 0 1 1 0 03 2.? 0 24 ; 74 11 7, • , 411 /03' *,..1.4.1411,.. ar.na • " • .. • 4 F INANCE--FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4202 PUB WKS ADMIN• 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH L EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0018 FROM` 12/01/90 TO -I2731/90 "' DATE 02/06/91-`_.."_._ ti 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 2 APPROPRIATION-- " MONTHLY --EXP"__...._ .-NTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE'`- UNENC BALANCE A a ` u DEPT: CONST/ ENG IN/ ENF 0 1. 2 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EGUIPMENT-LESS -THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 3, 000. 00 0. 00 5, 564. 00 9. 890. 00 1. 036. 00 2. 040. 00 740. 00 2; 000. 00 1. 000. 00 48. 440. 00 70. 710:00 68. 74 370. 50 85. 86 0. 00 335. 00 42. 1B 0. 00 4. 037. 00 4. 939. 28 75. 00 0. 00- 75. 00 0. 00 280, 540. 00 10, 407. 12 4204 BLDG MAINT "' - DEPT: CONST/ENGIN7ENF 4100 PERSONALL, SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL -'CASH' IN- ' 4187 UNIFORMS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT" SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LURES 4311 AUTO -MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY 4396 TRSFR"OUT-INS USER CHGS 155, 762. 00 1, 600. 00 3, 115. 00 3; 115: 00 315. 00 163, 907.00 21, 260. 00 21, 260. 00 90, 000. 00 40, 000. 00 800. 00 200. 00 8. 000. 00 24:-834. 00 13, 028. 30 73. 32 0. 00 0. 00 16.68 13, 118. 30 0.00 0. 00 192. 28 0. 00 2, 684. 39 4, 181. 57 629. 80 51. 66 510. 00 714. 53 16. 00 24, 222. 00 33, 009. 95 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 745. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 745. 00 74. 62 0. 00 74. 62 0. 00 122, 520. 51 745. 00 • 76, 755. 90 554. 73 0. 00 2, 666. 26 100. 08 80, 076. 97 6, 300. 00 6, 300. 00 397. 55 - 32, 046. 66 326. 60 12, 418. 65 60.96 437. 40 0. 00 269. 67 0. 00 393. 89 12; 420. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 536. 28 0. 00 0. 00 _. 0. 00 515. 18 0:00 2, 807. '72 6. 4 2, 879. 61 5, 708. 43 406. 20 1. 243. 34 230. 00 1. 285. 47 984. 00 24. 218. 00 36. 955. 05 48. 2 42.2 60,7 39. 0 68. 9 35 7 _. 1. 6 50. 0 47. 7 0. 38 99.'4 0.38 99.4 157, 282. 49 - 43. 9 79, 006. 10 1..045. 27 3, 1.15. 00 448. 74 214. 92 83, 830. 03 14, 960. 00 14, 960. 00 57, 953. 34 _. 2.6, 045. 07 362. 60 199. 88 200. 00 7, 090. 93 12, 414. 00 •.� a t im?xeel+aea, •,>.rirw..4�'. .y4... .... •-•••4•,^.^, u4.."40 a h.aL?19s17ae'`.,.:..`+•.•awama....asiaAirh iNewit ■ - e »•.rz. 1:.,tid i : -;a Lt ' ° It 'Str4 wzj'.c.S' � ektit, ` �.:�'' ,A. lih"` VAMEMM 'YSs'Sk+1p'., t 49. 2 34. 6 - 0. 0 85.5- 31.7 48. 8 29 6 29. 6 35: 6-- 34. _34. 8 54. 6 66: Z. .. .... 0. 0 11.3 50.0. IA l ,N 1, 2.3 26 22 1 52. ee 5A n; 63 64 66 67 en on 71 QIP • • • 73 )A l5 • .li 40 FINANCE-FA454 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TINE 13: 16: 15 "FROM -"12701 /90 TO -12731790 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4204 BLDG MAINT APPROPR IATIOhT.' .. DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN 5500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN 5500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL PAGE 0019 DATE 02706/91.7-------1 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 2 7 MONTHLY AXP --YID E'XPND. ENCUMMANCE UNENC BALANCE 164, 434. 00 3, 124. 78 650. 00 5. 500. 00 6, 150. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 58, 116. 72 2.051. 46 187. 87 0. 00 187. 87 DIVISION - TOTAL-.... "' -355;751700 - - - 16. 243: -OS ---144: 681: 56 4205 EQUIP SERVICE DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR- OVERTIME '" - ._ 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF • 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE - 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL ------ 5400 . -_-. "-.. - 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE_ THAN 5500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 'OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4601 COMM RESOURCES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 104, 362. 00 -600: 00 2, 087. 00 2, 087. 00 5,- 000. 00 114, 136. 00 4, 500. 00 1, 650. 00 '3, 150. 00 200. 00 10, 127. 00 1962T.a0' 20, 400. 00 20, 400. 00 8,682.56 51, 038. 28 O. 00 0. 00 O. 00 O. 00 0. 00 378. 84 0. 00 8, 682. 56 51, 417. 12 0. 00 66. 82 49. 50 0. 00 844. 00 960.-32----- .. - 983. 48 1, 156. 37 816. 09 0. 00 5, 064. 00 8,019.94 0.00 0..00 0.00 - 2; 051: 46 104, 265. 82 36. 5 462. 13 5,500.00 5, 962. 13 28. 9 0. 0 3.0 209, 017. 98 -4i. 2 -. 7 8 A ,0 12 .S 17 IP 20 20 J O. 00 53, 323. 72 48. 9 0. 00 600. 00 0.0 0. 00 2, 087. 00 0. 0 O. 00 1, 708. 16 18. 1 0.00 5,"000.00 0.0 0. 00 62, 718. 88 45. 0 O. 00 3, 516. 52 21. 8 O. 00 493. 63 70.0 O. 00 2, 333. 91 25. 9 O. 00 200. 00 O. 0 O. 00 5, 063. 00 50. 0 ----0.-Ob• - i I, 607: 06 40. 8. -. 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 20, 400. 00 O. 0 0.00 O. 00 O. 00 20, 400. 00 O. 0 5, 016. 00 0. 00 2, 507. 76 0. 00 2, 508.24 49. 9 5, 016. 00 0. 00 2, 507. 76 0. 00 2, 508. 24 49. 9 139, 179. 00 9, 642. 88 61, 944. 82 0. 00 97, 234. 18 38. 9 1, 161, 785. 00 94, 277. 76 494, 190. 13 9, 719. 47 657, 875. 40 43. 3 DEPT: COMM PROMOTION 166, 737. 00 13, 979.00 ...'. 74.732.52 0. 00 92, 004. 48 • 44. 8 n.. di ee n9 ,V ,1 •8 ( FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM -12701 /90 '" -113- 12/31:790 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4601 COMM RESOURCES APPROPRIATION- -- ---"- MONTHLY-"EXF YTD EXPND: DEPT COMM PROMOTION 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CAS}4 IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL "- 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4302 ADVERTISING 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT=INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL, 6101 PARKS 1, 000. C)0 3, 221. 00 3; 221 00 67, 500. 00 241, 679. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 758. 96 '5. 029. 29 20, 667. 25 085. 82 C). 00 - - -4, 734. 96 40, 234.29 120, 587. 59 65, 650. 00 7, 839. 20 21, 335. 06 -65,' 650.' Od" 7. 839: 20-"-' 21, 335. 06 11 000. 00 4, 300. 00 7. 600. 00 13, 000. CIO 700. 00 300. 00 700. 00- 1, 000. 00 1. 600. 00 20.'557: 00- 60, 757. 00 4, 449. 00 1. 000. 00 5, 449. 00 2, 300. 00 2, 300.00 375, 835:00 375, 835.: 00 DEPT: PARKS/REC 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME ' 79, 364. 00 256. 68 57. 33 1, 333. 38 2; 19I'. 17- 47. 53 0. 00 5. 00-- 0. 0-0. 00 1, 713. 00'---._._ 5, 594. 09 343:56 0. 00 343. 56 0.00-- 0.00 34, 444. 10 '34, 444. 10 6,607.30 0. 00- 4, 175. 80 1, 681. 20 4, 836. 72 9, 364. 75 331. 86 60. 99 115. 00 364. 08 370. 00 10, 278. 00 31, 578. 40 1, 292. 37 0 00 1, 292. 37 948 25 948. 25 175, 741. 67 175, 741, 67 38, 600. 40 25.38 PAGE 0020 DATE 02106/9r-- 50.0% 2 7 0 6 /9 1------ 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE ___....1TNENC BALANCE __....---�_-- 0.00 O. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 "0: 00' 3,261.58 0. 00 100. 00 0: 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 -O. 00-- 3, 0---3, 361. 58 3, 009. 01 0. 00 3, 009. 01 0. 00 0. 00 6, 370. 59 6, 370.59 0.00 0. 00 114.18 3, 221. 00 1,513.96,- 27, ,513.96-27, 265. 71 121, 091:'41 44, 314. 94 44; 314. 94 3, 562. 62 2, 618. 80 2, 663. 28 3, 635. 25 368. 14 239. 01 585. 00 635. 92 1, 230. 00 10; 279. 00 25, 817. 02 147. 62 1 000. 00 1, 147. 62 1,351. 75 1, 351. 75 193, 722. 74 193, 722. 74 40, 763. 60 474. 62- __. 88. 5 0. 0 147.0- 59. 6 49. 8 32. 4 32.. 4 --- 67. 6 39.0 64. 9 72:`0 47. 4 20. 3 16. 4 36. 4 23. 1 49.9 57.5 96. 6 0.0 78.9 41.2- 41. 2 20 20 2? 20 2.0 11 34 42 50 91 52 48. 4 48.4 48. 6 5. Zi 66 67 7,4 70 71 72 .eywnsr,crnrw,:trawrav 4.; F INANCE-FA454 -- TIME 13: 16: 15 6 I • 141 .4 4. 2' co . 410- 4,:13 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 6101 PARKS DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL -SERVICES 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATER IALS7SUPPLIES7OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP -7 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM:12701/90 1'0-T2-731-790' APPROPRIATION MONTHLY ERP VTD EXOND. PARKS/REC 1, 587. 00 1, 587. 00 83, 038S00 138; 510. 00 138, 510. 00 56, 093. 00 350. 00 12, 500. 00 • 770: 00 3, 500. 00 500:00- 300. 00 13, 560. 00 87773 00 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE -THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES 15.000.00 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS 3,000.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 18,000.00' DIVISION -TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8146 CIP 89-146 DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8601 CIP 86-601 DEPT. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0. 00 0. 00 539. 09- 1, 426. 50 6, 068. 21 - 40, 052. 28 247.50 -- 247. 50 2, 814. 92 0. 00 207. 23 37. 44 43, 938. 08 43, 938. 08 20, 468. 33 3, 345. 40 10,192.59 527,95 0. 00 440. 33 0.00 6.00 1, 130. 00 6, 780. 00 4, 109. 59-- • 41, 760.60 0. OCF 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 620. 22 0. 00 0. 00 620. 22 PAGE 0021 'DATE 62760/1 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 - 0: 00 210. 00 210. 00 0. 00 0. 00 545. 98 0. 00 0. 00 O. 0-0: 0. 00 0. 00 545. 98 - O. 00 13, 842. 36 0. 00 13, 042 36 27321:G0 io; 565:-30----.126, 371. 18' • -1•4; 598:34 327, 321. 00 STREET/SAFETY 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 O. 00 BLDGS & GROUNDS '0.00 10, 505. 30 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 126, 371. 18 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 14, 598. 34 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 125. 00 1, 587. 00 160. 50 42, 985. 72 • 94;361.92 94, 361. 92 35, 624. 2, 995. 1, 761. 242. 3, 059. 500. 494. 6, 780. 45, 466. 67 40- 43 05 67 00 00 00 42 620. 22- 1, 157. 64 3, 000. 00 :3, 537. 42 0. 0 89. 8 48.2 31. 8 31. 8 36. 4 955. 8 85. 9 68. 5 12. 5 O. 1. 2 50. 0 48. 1 • 92. 2 0.0 80. 3 186, 351. 40 - • 4. 0 186, 351. 48 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 1, 125. 00- 43. 0 • . 4,, r; 4 , , bt41"1..!A 0 iftd 't 41. • • 1. • e .' • 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 23 e ^ 1, 0 12 '7 10 711 2] 2.1 t`t FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 6601 CIP 86-601 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM -42/01/90 TO -12/31790 PAGE 0022. DATE 02/06/93- 50.07. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION"'- MONTHLY -EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE- DEPT: ALANCE DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 10, 770, 086. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 734, 090. 46 4,823,547.42 .,»w`'w:,•4j+«':.cese:¢,c�i:.;r+va7wr:::::.::.....a.� 1, 125. 00 1, 125. 00 1, 125. 00 47, 771. 16 1, 125. 00-- 1, 125. 00-- 1, 125. 00- 5, 898, 767. 42 0.0 0.0 0. 0 45._ 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 ,1 ,z ,s it ao ii 7, zn 7 ,o 14 ]4 's . • • 01' 17 tsP F I NANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND _ . 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/90 'T012/31/90 APPROPRIATION - MONTHLV-E"W - -YTO EXPND. 4300 MATERIALS7SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 22, 000. 00 1. 833. 33 10, 999. 98 22, 000. 00 1, 833. 33 10. 999. 98 DIVISION TOTAL 22, 000. 00 1, 833. 33 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 22, 000. 00 1, 833. 33 2601 STREET LIGHTING -7 - - DEPT: 'STREET -LIGHTING -- 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAIUSALARIESTMISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL -CASH -IN' 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE.BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT -SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS .AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR.-OUTINS-USER'CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 10, 999. 98 10, 999. 98 -78, 268.00 5, 679. 66 33-, 553. 08 500. 00 0. 00 68. 48 1, 565. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17-565.--00-- 0. 00- -1., 967. 10 2, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 9, 815. 00 712. 45 3, 291. 50 11, 454. 00 - -- - - 677. On-- 3, 526 34 105,167.00 7, 100. 00 10, 117. 00 17; 217. 00 --1751-00. 00 281. 00 9, 500. 00 3, 410. 00 4, 000. 00 300. 00 ---8;698:00 201, 289. 00 323, 673. 00 323, 673. 00' - 345. 673. 00 7, 069. 14 42, 407 30 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 997. 15 222. 86- 2. 774. 29 0. 0-0 -54; 657. 70 0. 00 22. 91. 129. 12- 0. 00 44. 51 3, 219. 05 1, 029 04 1, 091. 47 0. 00 0 00 725.00 -4,350.00 877. 03 64, 391. 77 7,'946. 17 109. 073. 36 7, 946. 17 109. 373. 36 9, 779. 50 120. 573. 34 ENCUMBRANCE PAGE 0023 DAT'02/06/9f 50. 07OF YEAR COMPLETE UNENC BALANCE 7., 0. 00 11, 000. 02 49. 9 0. 00 11, 000. 02 49. 9 0.00 0. 00 11, 000. 02 11, 000. 02 0.00 44, 714. 12 0. 00 431. 52 0. 00 1, 565. 00 " • •o. 10- 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0:00 0. 00 3, 576. 13 0. 00 264. 42 0. 00 • 0.00 3, 840. 55 3, 840. 55 3, 640. DU 3, 840. nn 2. 000. 00 6. 523. 50 7. 927. 66 62, 759. 70 4. 102. 85 10, 339. 86 14, 442. 71 120, 442. 30 236. 49 2, 704. 82 2, 380. 96 2. 644. 11 300. 00 4, 348. 00 133, 056. 68 210, 259. 09 210, 259. 09 221, 239. •11 49. 9 49. 9 42. 8 13. 6 0. 0 125. 6 0. 0 33. 5 30. 7 40 3 42. 2 2. 2 16. 1 31. 2 15. 8 71. 5 30. 1 33. O. 0 56.6. 33. 8 35. 0 33. '' FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR " 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT .CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM' I2101/90 TO 12/31790 PAGE 0024 DATE 02/06791- 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATTON-_".._-_.._. MONTHLY -EXP--- YTD-EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE' 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION.' TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3301 VEH PKG DIST 15, 779. 00 15, 779. 00 15, 779. 00 15, 779. 00 DEPT: PKG- FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR' SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT------- 4188 ETIREMENT'-__.....:_.4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL ' 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPH6TNE - 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4396 TRSFR OUT" INS' USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EGUIPMENT" 5420 DEP REC I AT I ON/EGUIP&VEH OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5600 BUILDINGS/IMPROVEMENTS 5620 DEPRECIATION/BLDGS&IMPRV OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL "16, 454: 00'" - 329. 00 329. 00 1, 254. 00 20, 429. 00 471000.. 00 47, 000. 00 ' 300. 00 1, 000. 00 2, 381. 00 1,314.92 1, 314. 92 1, 314. 92 1,314.92 7, 889. 52 7, 089 52 7. 889. 52 7, 889. 52 1. 155. 10 - 5, 457. 69 0. 00 O. 00 0.00 0.00 111. 12 390. 13 1, 349. 11 6, 316. 86 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ;7, 889. 48 7, 089. 48 7. 889. 48 50. 0 50..0 50. 0 7, 889. 48 50. 0 10, 996. 31 329. 00 329. 00 1, 593. 96 863. 87 14, 112. 14 33. 1 0. 0 0.0 22:T -- 31. 2 T-- 31. 1 . 30. 9 0. 00 17, 931. 15 0. 00 29, 068. 85 38. 1 0. 00 _--. -' 17, 931. 15 0. 00 29, 068. 85 38. 1 0. 00 7. 26 0.00 85. 26 265. 00 0. 00 265. 00 0. 00 2, 145. 00 2. 145. 00 72, 220. 00 72, 220. 00 87, 999. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 434. 37 1, 434. 37 2, 749. 29 50. 00 35. 84 0. 00 468. 00 553. 84 0. 00 0 00 0.: 00 C) 00 24, 901. 85 24, 801. 85 32, 691. 37 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100. 00 264.16 1, 000. 00 463. 00 1, 827. 16 33. 3 11. 9 0.0 50: 2 -.. 23. 2 265. 00 0. 0 265. 00 0. 0 2, 145. 00 2, 145. 00 47, 418. 15 47, 418. 15 55, 307. 63 0. 0 O. 0 34. 3 34. 3 37. 1 5 6 7 10 '4 IS IA 10 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 211 iP 31 ,.1 .11 .13 ft 47 If 50 51 v 5:f .40 63 66 67 611 60 ;C, 72 73 7A • • to 0 ,‘ ion to • IA • 4,4 ! FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0025 'FROM 12701/90 T�12731/90 - - -nATr-ovo-679r- 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 110 PARKING FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS7SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3302 PARKING ENF DEFT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES . 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL -CASH -M-- 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 4180 RETIREMENT 4187 UNIFORMS 4168 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 4200 CONTRACT'SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERTACS7SUPPLTESTOTHER 4302 ADVERTISING 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE-OPER'SUPPLIES 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR -FUELS -AND -LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 4315 MEMBERSHIP . 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TR5FR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL* -- 1, 314, 755. 00 1, 314. 755. 00 1, 314, 755. 00 1, 314, 755. 00 108, 729. 58 662, 377. 48 108, 729. 58 662, 377 48 . . 108, 729. 58 662, 377. 48 108, 729. 58 662. 377. 48 545; 487. - 39, 315. *237. 615. 22 10, 000. 00 1. 406. 53 6, 869 54 10, 909. 00 0. 00 0 00 10, 909. 00'. 1, 687. 34- -7; 264. 92 42, 000. 00 5, 500. 00 68, 404. 00 6, 567. 00 6, 047. 61 207. 05 5. 183.136-- 187. 60 44, 436. 46 1, 613. 83 24. 784..22 1. 567. 65 57, 642. 00 4, 435. 16 24, 565. 54 757-, -74-18-. 00-- -58, 470. 81- 348; 717. 38 6; 000. 00 6, 000. 00 0. 00 652, 377. 52 50. 3 0. 00 652, 377. 52 50. 3 0. 00 652, 377. 52 50. 3 0. 00 652. 377. 52 50. 3 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 307, 871. 78 3. 1.30. 46 10, 909. 00 3, 644. 08 2, 436. 46- 3, 886. 17 43, 619. 78 249. 47 4, 749. BB 0. 00 33, 076. 46 249.-4-7 408, 451. 15 0.00 783. 34 O. 00 0. 00 783: 34 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 3, 300. 00 0. 66 1, 955. 65 0. 00 --- ---35, 000700- -------- 18; 580 44 '3,309:301- 3. 500. 00 0. 00 1, 570. 00 ' 0. 00 15, 000. 00 0. 00 1, 460. 90 665. 50 --- -6,-,500T00- 452.33 3,627.77 0.00 12. 000. 00 91. 85 3, 737. 79 0. 00 400. 00 0. 00 40. 00 0. 00 - I, 700. 00 0. 00 215.12 268. 00 1, 500. 00 0. 00 683. 54 0. 00 45. 646. 00 3. 803. 00 22, 818. 00 0. 00 - --I-24;-646.-00- '''' -------7:001:1-7- ------ 54, 689. 21 4, 242.-88 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 2;350. 00 341. 56' 961. 16 5, 216. 66 5, 216. 66 43. 5 68.6 0. 0 66. 5 105. B 29. 3 36. 2 27. 6 42. 6 46. 0 13. 0 0.00 0.0 1, 344. 35 59. 2 13,110.18 1, 930. 00 44. 8 12, 873. 60 14. 1 2,972.23 54.9 - 8, 262. 21 31. 1 360. 00 10. 0 1, 216. 88. 28.4 B16. 46 45.5 22, 828. 00 47.? 65, 713. 91 47. 2. 192.35 ' 1,196.49 49 0 El 0, III Io ;1 23 11 Z9 12 4 , 4 4 A L., 75; 51 SO FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 110 PARKING FUND 3302 PARKING ENF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) --FROM-12/01/90 TU -12731790 ' PAGE 0026 ' DATE"02706741 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION"-" "MONTHLY -EXP --_-YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE' _ UNENC BALANCE `7 DEPT: PKG FACILITIES :5400 EGUIPMENT 5403 VEHICLES 5420 DEPRECIATION/EGUIP&SIEH 3499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS. OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL ... -- .. • 30, 000. 00. 27, 196. 00 10, 000. 00 69, 546. 00 3, 500. 00 3, 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 341. 56 0. 00 0. 00 9, 947. 68 10. 908. 84 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 192. 35 0. 00 572. 00 0. 00 0. 00 572. 00 0. 00 961, 110.00 65, 813.54 415, 670. 77 961, 110. 00 65, 813. 54 415, 670. 77 2, 275, 865. 00 " --"174, 174, 543. 12 - .... -1078, 048. 25 4,684.70 4,684.70 4,684.70 30, 000. 00 27, 196. 00 52. 32 58, 444. 81 • 2, 928. 00 2, 928. 00 540, 754. 53 540, 754. 53 1, 193, 132. 05 0. 0 0. 0 99. 4--- 15. 9 16. 3 16.3 43.7 43.7 47. 5- - 2 3 4 5 s 0 w 2 is 1,1 ,u 10 20 71 2) 24 2.5 26 2, 14 ,5 T. 4, 40 41) 50 52 0'. 00 67 60 ,I )4 .144x414.7411' • e 367 3l ® ♦a. ® . t 01 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16:15 FUND DIV ODJT DESCR 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0027 -------FROM 12701 /90 TO -i2731790 DATe 02706191 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 1, 280, 969. 00 1, 280, 969. 00 1, 280, 969. 00 1. 280, 969. 00 1 280. 969..00- -- 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP- YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 106, 747. 42 106, 747. 42 106,747-42 106. 747. 42 106,747.42' 640, 484. 52 640, 484. 52 640, 464. 52 640, 481. 52 640, 484. 52 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 640, 484. 48 640, 484. 48 640, 484. 4B 640, 484. 48 640, 404. 48 50.0 50. 0 50. 0 50.0 50. 0 0 11 12 1, 14 15 6 ii 166 IP 70 21 lie 7, 7.: 4n 47. 47 4B 44 80 7t 5) !t 7 5n nct 82 0.3 44 66!i 6667 677 1 41 fu3 480 F I NANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT.DESCR CITY OF HERMOSI BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) - FROM12/01/90 TO-I2731T90 PAGE 0028 DATE '02/06791- 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION ' _`. MONTHLY -EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7, 120 COUNTY GAS TAX FUND 1299 BUDGET. TRANSFER DEPT: MOMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 34, 841. 00 34, 841. 00 2, 903. 42 2, 903. 42 17, 420. 52 17, 42C). 52 0. 00 17, 420. 48 50. 0 0. 00 17, 420. 48 150. 0 34, 841. 00 2, 903. 42 17, 420. 52 0. 00 17, 420. 48 50. 0 34, 841. 00 2, 903. 42 17, 420. 52 0. 00 17, 420. 48 50. 0 341841: 00 ' - _. --- - - 2, 903. 42.._ . ` ... 17, 420. 52 . 0: 00 - - ... -17; 420. AS 50.'0 -- 42 43 0.-0-- 43 ns 45 ao Aft 44. -o SI a . 7iN.......... .. •n'tG,d..:.:'rJa,i'3i+i..; r:.:: win3;.?:'1',:12c, s i • 5 6 A•" FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) '.----_FROM-i2701 /90 -T0-12731790 APPROPRIATION . --------------------- 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 410, 485. 00 410, 485. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 243, 000. 00- 350, 485. 00 243, 000. 00- 350, 485. 00 410, 485. 00 243, 000. 00- 350, 485. 00 410, 485. 00 243, 000. 00- 350, 485. 00 -41-0, 485:00 -- 243, 000. 00",- - 350; 485. 00 PAGE 0029 DATE o 7 6i -9f 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 60, 000. 00 60, 000. 00 60. 000. 00 60, 000. 00 60; 000. 00 85. 3 85. 3 85. 3 85.3 4 6 P P 10 12 1.1 , , z' 74 29 7767 11.4 41 nfl 4: 41, 40 1 41 1;7 S] 52 6J 6,1 M17 40 ,U ,2 1.3 4 4 1 N,1NC:F F A4'i4 TTt1( 13 16.15 FUND DTV OBJT DESCR 1:.'6 HUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND 8514 C10 89--514 Gine. v OF I-IERMOSA BEACH EXI'I-'NUITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 12/01/90 TO 12/31/90 APPROPRTATTON DEP 1. PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICFS 41201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVA11: 1113. JEC: T 5013 1(11 A1_ 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL-. 3, :'00 un 617,255 00 617.755 00 620,455.00 620, 455. U0 620,455 ('0 M(7NTHLY EXP YTD EXPND 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 (i 00 (1 00 423;966 76 423,966 76 423,'766. 76 423. 966. 7/. 423, 9f-./.' 76 PAGE 0030 DATE 02/06/91 50.0% OF YEAF( COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE- 0 ALANCF 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. ((1: 3, ;200. 00 .'00. 00 193, 298. 24 193, 2(.0 1 196, 4(38. 24 196, 438. 24 196. '1(38. 24 0 0 0.0 68 6 613 6 68 3 68. 3 68 3 +se&t,rrt.•ri `�-a,c.4aH�c,na.�+ _ _ •Xt+iF?Y_�i'ntre+8 ti.,.t H...sw::ctNA] r • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DTV OBJT DESCR 127 6% UTILITY USER TAX. FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0031 -FROM --12701 /90 TO -(2731790 DATE b 7Z5b1 i -� 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPR!ATIOt'f MONTHLY ^TXF1 YTD EXPND. • DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 1, 354, 342. 00 1, 354, 342. 00 1,354, 342.00 1, 354, 342. 00 112, 861. 83 112, 861. 83 112, 861. 83 112, 861. 83 677, 170. 98 677, 170. 98 677,.170. 98 677, 170. 98 1, 354:-342. 00 112, 861. 83 - 677, 170. 98 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 677, 171. 02 49. 9 0. 00 677, 171. 02 49. 9 0. 00 677, 171. 02 49. 9 . 0. 00 677, 171. 02 ' 49. 9 O. 00 .. 677, 171. 02 49 9 i\ B. Jr, 35 59 55 P, 07 1' ■ 11 ,641 : 1':'! CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 13:16:15 FR0M-32701/90 T0`12731190 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR 4701 HOUSING .REHAB • APPROPRIATION- DEPT: OTHER 4200 CONTRACT' SERVICES'" 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE' OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 4703 CDBG ADMIN. 105. 255. 00 105, 255. 00 105, 255. 00 DEPT: OTHER. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 11.695.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 11. 695.00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 11, 695. 00 116, 950. 00 1r6, 950. 00' PAGE 0032 DATE 02/06/91- .-- 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLV."'EXP. .VTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE. UNENC BALANCE 0.00 0.00 8,831.14 8, 831. 14 0. 00 96, 423. 86 0. 00 96, 423.86 0. 00 8, 831. 14 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00- 4, 151. 43 4, 151. 43 4,151.43 12. 982. 57 12, 982. 57 i .Yenta.. 5.-, . "--',.."'''41 .: . ... 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0: 00 8.3 8.3 96, 423.86 8.3 7, 543. 57 7, 543. 57 7,543.57 103, 967. 43 103, 967. 43 35. 4 35. 4 10 12 15 14 12 16 19 20 21 ,2 71 24 25 26 27 2.1 30 ., 33 34 47 50 51 152 53 114 17 156 nu P2 156 5') 611 1'f ]4 .5 F INANCE-FA454 • TIME 13: 16: 15 w 0 et • 0. 0 '1 0. 0. FUND DIV OBJT DESCR. 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0033 --TO-12-731790- • 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION - MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENtUfliANet. 014EKt BALANCE DEPT: MOMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 10,938.00 10,938.00 10,930.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10, 938. 00 10,938.00 10,930.00 DIVISION TOTAL 10, 938. 00 10, 938. 00 10, 938. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 10, 938. 00 10, 938. 00 10. 938. 00 3401 DIAL A RIDE - DEPT: PUBLIC' -TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE'BENEFITT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT -SERVICES' 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHtINE 4305 OFFICE OPER-SUPPLIES 4396 TRSFR. OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 3402 COMMUTER 13US 16, 451. 00 0. 00 2, 063. 00 542. 00- 20. 056. 00 133, 886. 00 133, 886. 00 50. 00 500. 00 283. 00 B33. 00 154, 775.00 DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERV10E/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 936. 00 0. 00 744. 00 576. 00 7, 256. 00 , 53, 000. 00 53, 000. 00 1, 379. 28 0. 00 60. 34 42. 03 - 1, 481. 65 7, 766. 64 90. 15 290. 15 517. 20 8, 664. 14 0. 00 • 000 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 24. 00 24. 00 1, 505. 65, 504. 20 0.00 19. 42 13. 60 537. 22 1, 525. 57 1, 525. 57 20. 80 47. 76 144. 00 212. 56 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 0. 00 100. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8, 876. 70 0. 00 2, 815. 39 60. 10 97. 21 183. 48 3, 156. 18 10, 614. 49 10, 614 49 0.00 100. 0 8, 684. 36 90. 15- 1, 772. 85 1, 024. 80 11, 391. 86 133. 886. 00 133, 086. 00 29. 20 452. 24 139. 00 620. 44 47.2 00 14. 0 33. 5 43. 1 0. 0 0. 0 41.6 9. 50. 8 25. 5 145, 898. 30 5. 7 32 24 •• '• 0. 00 3, 120. 61 47.4 0. 00 60. 10- 0. 0 ,.. 0. 00 646. 79 13. or " 0.00 392. 52 31 8 0. 00 1, 099 82 43. 4 .., 74 O. 00 0. 00 42, 385. 51 20. 0 .., n 42, 385. 51 20, 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0034 , TIME 13:16:15 ... - - -FROM-12/01 /90 TO -.12731790. .------ ---DATE 02/06/91--------- ;\ 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 2 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND 3402 COMMUTER BUS APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP""-. YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Z DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER '4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS.. OBJECT SUBTOTAL 95. 00 95. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 60, 351.00 3403 BUS PASS SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT"SERVICES-`""' 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8. 00 48. 00 8. 00 48. 00 2, 070. 79 1, 631. 00 137. 40 205.00 17.22 240. 00 14. 59 2, 076. 00 169. 21 13, 650. 00 13, 650. 00 699. 00 699. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 16, 425.00 3408 COMMUTER XPRESS DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION. TOTAL . DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 8, 608. 00 8, 60B. 00 8: 608. 00 240, 159. 00 251, 097. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 13, 818. 67 0. 00 806. 40 83. 69 " 77. 92 968. 01 3,544.00 3,544.00 58. 00 348. 00 58. 00 -- ---- - 348. 00 227. 21 4, 860. 01 0. 00 0. 00' 0. 00 3, 803. 65 14, 741. 65 0. 00 0 00 0. 00 27, 555. 38, 38, 492. 28 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 47. 00 50. 5 47. 00 n0. 5 46, 532. 33 22. 8 824. 60 121. 31 162.08 1, 107. 99 10, 106. 00 10, 106.00 351. 00 351. 00 49. 4 40. 8 32: 4 46. 6 25. 9 25.9 49. 7 49: 7 11, 564. 99 29. 5 8, 608. 00 9, 608. 00 8,608.00 212, 603. 62 212,603:62 0. 0 0.0 O. 0- 11. 4 ...-. 15. 3 4 4 11 io 16 2'1 26 27 21 i2. .1. ,4 4, n. 66 ^.G 613 641 67 66 60 7o o )1 ]4 J5 0 co •t • • ®; F I NANCE-FA454 --TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT.DESCR .., 100 GRANT FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0035 --FROM T2/01 /90 TO 1273[/90 DACE 02/06/91 .APPROPRIATION--- 4300 PPROPRIATION--- 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8506 CIP 86-506 •' 125, 894. 00 125, 894. 00 125. 894. 00 125, 894. 00 DEPT: PARKS- 5400 ARKS 5400 EOVIPMENT 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 0.00 0. C)0 0. 00 0.00 125. 894. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 3, 375. 00 3, 375. 00 3, 375. 00 3, 375. 00 939. 03= :- 939. 03- 939. 03- 939. 03- 2, 435. 97 105. 644. 00 105. 644. 00 105. 644. 00 105, 644. 00 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMDRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 20, 250. 00 83. 9 O. 00 20,'250. 00 83.9 0. 00 20, 250. 00 83. 9 0. 00 20. 250. 00 83. 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 105. 644. 00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0. 00 0. 00 O. O O. 00 20. 250. 00 83. 9 • ® t F INANCE•-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 155 CROSSING GUARD FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND> " ''FROM --1'2/01 /90 'TO- 12731790 - APPROPRIATION' DEPT: MONT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2102 CROSSING GUARD DEPT: POLICE - 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4113 CROSSING -GUARDS - 4180 RETIREMENT 4187 UNIFORMS 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT -SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT, SERVICE/GOUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL PAGE 0036 DATE 02/06/91"" -- 50. 0% _..50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY -EXP.-- -YTD EXP ND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8, 892. 00 178. 00 178. 00 40,'408: 00 1, 115. 00 400. 00 816. 00 51, 987. 00 6, 000. 00 525. 00 6, 525. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 961. 08 5, 619. 61. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 "3, 681. 38 --.._-- -13, 727. 90 136.70 582.05 0. 00 67. 17 90.72.. 417.77 4, 869.88 20, 414. 50 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 2; 805. 00 " 234. 00 2. 805. 00 234. 00 61, 317. 00 5, 103. 88 61, 317. 00 61, 317. 00 5,- 103. 89 5, 103. 88 11841. 07 110. 00 1, 951. 07 1, 404. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0:00 0. 00 0. 00 Z3. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 1, 404. 00 0. 00 23, 769. 57 23, 769. 57 23, 769. 57 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0-00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0. 00. 0. 0 0.00 0.0 3,272.39 178. 00. 178. 00 26, 680. 10 532. 95 332. 83 63. 1- 0. 0 • 0.0 33. 9 52. 2 16.7 398.2_3 51.1 31,572.50 39 2 4, 158. 93 30. 6 415. 00 20. 9 4, 573. 93 29. 9 1, 401. 00 50. 0 1, 401. 00 50. 0 37, 547. 43 38. 7 37, 547. 43 38. 7 37, 547. 43 38. 7 7 3 s 6 v li „ I, ,6 ,v 20 21 44 25 26 27 211 ro .17 33 34 3, 51 52 3 5,1 :1 1,0 05 57 r,n cu 70 n J4 i.3 74 :5 ,C • i 3 ; 41. • .. 411, 24 • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 160 SEWER FUND 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL -CASH -IN --- 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303"UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EGUIPMENT-MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) -FROM Y2701/90 -TU-12731790 . , APPROPRIATION- MONTHLYEXPND. MGMT/SUPPORT • . - • _ 1, 765, 821. 00 1, 765, 821. 00 1, 765, 821. 00 1, 765, 821. 00 ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 93, 575. 00 3, 000. 00 1, 872. 00 ----- 1;872: 00 11, 734. 00 9, 924. 00 121, 977. 00 3. 100. 00 5, 100. 00 515. 00 10, 100. 00 880. 00 6. 400. 00 26, 488. 00 44, 383. 00 BOO. 00 70, 000. 00 70, 800. 00 9. 070. 00 9, 070. 00 251, 330. 00 147, 151. 75 147, 151. 75 882, 910. 50 882, 910. 50 147, 151. 75 882, 910. 50 147,151.75 7,686.60 O. 00 0.00 O. 00 930. 47 709. 33 9,326.62-- O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 85. 91 0. 00, 2, 207. 00. 2, 292. 91 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 11, 619. 53 882. 910. 50 44, 881. 77 566. 40 0. 00 766. 32 4,522.68 3,627.25 '54,164.42 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 99 84 1; 907. 07 596. 74 28. 58 13, 242. 00 15, 773 23 613. 82 0. 00 613 02 0.00 0. 00 70, 751. 47 PAGE 0037 TogiT-02706791 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE EnitUHIJANdt..-UNENd BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ' 01 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 145. 13 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 145. 13 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 145. 13 882, 910. 50 882, 910. 50 882, 910. 50 882, 910. 50 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 50. 0 48, 693. 23 47. 9 2, 433. 60 18. 8 1, 872. 00 0. 0 1, 105. 68 40. 9 7, 211. 32 38. 5 6, 296. 75 36. 5 67, 612. 58 44. 5 2. 000. 00 0. 0 3, 100. 00 0. 0 5, 100. 00 0. 0 416. 16 19. 1 8, 147. 80 19. 3 283. 26 67. 8 6, 371: 42 0. 4 13. 246. 00 49. 9 28, 464. 64 35 8 136. 18 76. 7 70, 000. 00 0. 0 70, 186. 18 0.8 9, 070. 00 9, 070. 00 0.0 0. 0 1130, 433. 40 28. 2 32 4 10 11 1.1 13 4 14 17 io 7.7 77 2.1 •: FINANCE-FA454 ' TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 160 SEWER FUND DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8406 CIP 88-406 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE. SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0038 "-"- - - FROM -12/01 /90 ' T0-12731790 DATE 02/06/91-- 50. 270b/91 "� - -�-- 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION 251, 330. 00 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER' 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL MONTHLY -EXP---- YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE 'UNENC BALANCE 11, 619.53 70, 751.47 145.13 180, 433. 40 28. 2 - 0. 00 0. 00 .. ..._..._ .... 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 2, 017, 151. 00 0. 00 0. 00 158. 771. 28 0.00 0. 00 953, 661. 97 0. 00 0. 00 145. 13 0 C)0 0. 00 1, 063, 343. 90 0. 0 0. 0 47. 2 4 6 14 In IP 1P 26 27 ,n 16 5n ae 50 67 .M1 60 67 011 1) ,3 74 75 70 40 5. CITY OF HERMOSA 'BEACH 4' FINANCE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0039 _ TIME 13:16:15 --------- -FROM-12701/90-TO 12731/90 DATE 02/06/91 i'\ 4 1 0 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 32 4 4 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION - - MONTHLY EXP--- YTD EXPND. ENtUNBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 5 40' s 4 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND B 7 A 4,4 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER ' DEPT: MONT/SUPPORT ia _4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER to- 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL 0. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0. 00 2103 SPEC INVESTOTNS - DEPT: -POLICE-- 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 4111 ACCRUAL -CASH -1N 4180 RETIREMENT 4187 UNIFORMS 4188 EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL - 51 4200 'CONTRACT -SERVICE'S - 0 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 40 ' 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND -LUBES 4322 UNCLASSIFIED 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS ! OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPNENTLESS-THAN-$500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 170, 604. 00 10, 560. 00 24, 000. 00 3, 623: -00'- 46, 053. 00 2, BOO. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0, 00 0 0 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 14, 342. 00 ig6, 052. 00 880. 00 5, 280. 00 2, 500. 51 19, 099. 66 0.--00- 2, 359. 80 4, 172. 02 20, 860. 10 233. 36 1, 400. 16 -14;-48-1700 1; 020: 52 4, 156. 76 272, 121. 00 23, 148. 41 139, 208. 48 6, 425. 00 6, 425. 00 7, 680. 00 Z-; 000. 00- 5. 000. 00 13, 496. 00 32, 176. 00 5, 030. 00- - 0. 00 20, 300. 00 25. 330. 00 336. 052. 00 336, 052. 00 336.052. 00 157. 19 157. 19 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 125. Op 1, 125. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 24, 430. 60 24, 430. 60 24. 430. 60 2, 158. 14 2, 158. 14 0. 00 0. 00 1, 150. 00 6, 750. 00 7, 900. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 149, 266. 62 149, 266. 62 149, 266. 62 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.0 0. 00 0.0 64, 552. 00 50. 4 5, 280. 00 50.0 4, 900. 34 79. 5 i; 263. 20 - 65. 1 25, 192. 90 45. 2 1, 399. 84 50. 0 ib; 324. 24 28.7 132, 912. 52. 51. I 0. 00 4, 266. 86 33. 5 0. 00 4, 266. 86 33. 5 0. 00 7, 680. 00 0 0 O. 00 6, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 3, 850. 00 23. 0 0. 00 6, 746. 00 50 0 0. 00 24, 276. 00 24 0.00 3, 026. 36 0. 00 3, 026. 36 3, 026. 36 3. 026. 36 3, 026. 36 5, 030. 00 3, 026. 36- 0. 0 20, 300. 00 0. 0 22, 303. 64 11. 9 183, 739. 02 45. 3 183, 737. 02 45. 3 183, 759. 02 45. 3 Is 20 21 2.'s 24 25 • 41 , . In 161 I. • 41 F INANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE DEPT: FIRE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) --FROM-12/01/90 TO' 12731790 APPROPRIATION 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL • 100, 000. 00 100, 000- 00 100, 000. 00 100, 000. 00 100; 000. 00... -- PAGE 0040 DATE 62706/91 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 2 3 1 n 7 11 0 1S IN iq 2n L1 21 20 MONTHLY-EXPYTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 264. 45 17, 264.45 17, 264. 45 17, 264. 45 17, 264. 45 0. 00 0- 00 0.00 0. 00 6: 00 82, 735. 55 82. 735. 55 82, 735. 55 82. 735. 55 82, 735. 55 +iaSliu..N:.Cwti 17. 2 17.2 17. 2 17. 2 17.2 7. n2 1,3 F•1 11 R., I 1 00 07 611 71 7:f 74 70 ,6 41 • • 14 114 2.0 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND. DIV OBJT DESCR 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 8137 CIP 85-137 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) -------FROM-12701/90" " 7D -12-73x790 APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT -SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4316 TRAINING OBJECT SUBTOTAL 505, 841. 00 505, 841. 00 0.00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAE-" "-505 841:-`00- 8141 CIP 89-141 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 129,750.00 OBJECT- SUB) U i AL _ -a0- DIVISION TOTAL 179;750:00-- 8142 29;750:00"_.8142 CIP 89--142 DEPT` STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 34, 542. 00 34, 542. 00 DIVISION"" "TOTAL .34, 542. 00 - 8144 CIP 90-144 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8146 CIP 89-146 446, 000. 00 446; 000. 00 446, 000. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ 7, 300. 00 7, 300. 00 PAGE 0041 DATE 02/06/91 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 29. 10 0. 00 O. CSO 29. 10 0. 00 0.'.06.._.,-- 29. 10 O. 00 0. 0C.F- 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 505, 841. 00 505, 841. 00 0. 0 0.0 29. 10- 0. 0 29. 10-... 0. 0 - - 0.-00 505, 811. 90 a b 0. 00 -0. 05 129, 750. 00 129, 750. 00 0. 00 0. 00 129, 750. (>0 34, 201. 34 34, 201. 34 0.00 0. 00 34; 201.34 0:00 0. 0 0. 0'---- 340. 66 99. 0 340. 66 99. 0 340.66 99 0 0. 00 O. 00 0.00 446, 000. 00 0 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 446, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0 OC) 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 0. 00 446„ 000. 00 0. 0 7,300.00 7,300 00 0. 0 0 0 n 9 w „ ,2 IT; ,5 18 ,7 ,e 10 :o 71 22 71 74 23 78 77 7n ,d „ • ,4 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 8146 CIP 89-146. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND> "FROM ':12/01 /90 "TO 12/31/90 APPROPRIATION"- DEPT: PPROPRIATION" DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4300 MATER IALS7SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2,700.00 OBJECT SUB TOTAL 2, 700. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 8148 CIP 89-148 10, 000. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT'SERVTCES"' 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 10. 000. 00 10. 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 10, 000. 00 8150 CIP 89-150 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES'-""' 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20, 000. 00 20, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 20, 000. 00. 8151 CIP 89-151 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES" 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8170 CIP 87-170 40, 500. 00 40, 500. 00 40, 500. 00 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 337, 219. 00 337, 219. 00 337, 219. 00 1, 533;852. 00 MONTHLY""EXP""..-"" YTD EXPND. PAGE 0042 DATE 02/06/91" ----- 50. 0% ___--50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE /. 0. 00 2, 684. 42 1, 537. 20 1, 521. 62- 156. 3 0. 00 2, 684. 42 1, 537. 20 1 , 521. 62- 156. 3 0. 00 2.'684. 42 1, 537. 20 5, 778. 38 42. 2 0. 00 0. 00 4, 800. 00 5, 200. 00 48. 0 0. 00 0. 00 4, 800. 00 5, 200. 00 48. 0 0. 00 0. 00 ' 4, 800. 00 5, 2.00. 00 48. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. OC> 20, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40, 500. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40, 500. 00 0. O 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40, 500. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0 00 0.'00 337, 219. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 . 0. 00 337, 219. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 337, 219. 00 0. 0 0. 00 36, 914. 86 6. 337. 20 1, 490, 599. 94 2 8 2 3 12 4 )1 32 3,1 Sk I R1� 4111 4111. 0 411 0 • 14 9 F I NANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 8201 CIP 85-201 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) 'FROM -712701/90 TO 12/31790 APPROPR IATION DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES' 4201 'CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE • OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISIONTOTAL' DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8406 CIP 88-406 DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8506 CIP 86-506 DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 22, 000. 00 22, 000. 00 22, 000. 00 22, 000. 00 SANITARY -SEWER" 1, ANITATTY-SEWER- 1, 920; 163. 00 1, 920, 163. 00 1. 920, 163. 00 1. 920, 163. 00 PARKS 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EGUIPMENT=MORE-THAN` $500.. .'-' 5499 NON -CAPITALIZED ASSETS . OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8508 CIP 87-508 24, 800. 00 24, 060. 00 0. 00 0. 00 24, 800. 00 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8511 CIP 90-511 DEPT: 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 25, 000. 00 25. 000. 00 25. 000. 00 PARKS 15, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 612. 41 612.41 612. 41 612. 4f- 0. 00 0. o0-- 939. 03 939. 03 939. 03 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 149. 58-- 149. 58-- 149. 58- 149. 58- 7. 719. 39 7, 7.19. 39 f , 030. 92 939. 03 1, 969. 95 9.689.34 0 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 PAGE 0043 DATE .02-7067/1- 50. 0% 82-7067/ - 50.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 22. 000. 00 22. 000. 00 22, 000. 00 22, 000. 00 0.0 O. 0 0.0 0.0 0. 00 1, 920, 312. 58 O. 0 1, 920, 312. 58 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 920. 312. 58 1, 920, 312. 58 17, 080. 61 17. 080. 61. 1,030.92-: 939. ,030.92- 939. 03- 1, 969. 95- 15, 110. 66 25, 000. 00 25, 000. 00 25, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 0 31. 1 - 31.1 0.0-.. 0. 0 0. 0 39. 0 O. 0 O. 0 0. 0 15, 000. 00 0. 0 11 e IO 11 Ix U 6 P p 20 •2 24 25 20 2, 41 12 43 4; 4P 4) .111 4H 00 5,f :i ,4 ,51 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM- 12/01/90 TO --.12731/90 APPROPRIATIO PAGE 0044 DATE 02/06791 50. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE MONTHLY -EXP. YTD EXPND. ENCUMIIRANCE-- UNENC BALANCE T 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 4200 CONTRACT' SERVICES -- _ - ---- --- OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 . 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 15, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 e 8512 CIP B9-512' DEPT: 15, 000. 00 0. 0 15, 000: 00 0. 0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT' SERVICE/PRIVATE -74, 750. 00 0. 00-- --- ._ 250. 00- 0. 00 95, 000. 00 0. 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 94, 750. 00 0. 00 250. 00- 0. 00 95, 000. 00 0. 2 DIVISION TOTAL 94, 750. 00 0. 00 250. 00 0. 00 95, 000. 00 0.2 8513 CIP 89-513 DEPT: PARKS 5500 LAND 5501 LAND .. - '260, 000. 00 _.. 0 00 -" O. 00 0. 00 260, 000. 00 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 260, 000. 00 0. 00 .0. 00 0. 00 260, 000. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 260, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 260, 000. 00 0. 0 8516 CIP 89-516 DEPT: PARKS -7- 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 7, 958. 00 0. 00 3, 394. 27 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7, 958. 00 0. 00 3, 394. 27 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 7, 958. 00 0. 00 3, 394. 27" 0. 00 8517 CIP 89-517 DEPT. PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT "SERVICETPR IVATE ' ` .._ ` 2; 566. 00 0. 00 . 0. 00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 566. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 5400 EQUIPMENT" --' 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 0. 00 0. 00 2, 565. 44 0. 00 : OBJECT SUBTOTAL " 0. 00 0. 00 2, 565.. 44 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 2, 566. 00 DEPT: PARKS 8510 CIP 89-518 4200 CONTRACT -SERVICES .. 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 12,305.00 0. 00 2, 565. 44 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 4, 563. 73 4, 563 73 42 6 4, 563. 73 42. 6 2, 566. 00 2, 566. 00 2, 565. 44- 2, 565. 44- 0. 56 12, 305. 00 0.0 - 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 99. 9 a 2 4 5 6 8 10 12 3 4 1, 16 17 l8 IB 20 21 72 24 20 4,. 17 4n no 51 42 fi11 TY 60 60 67 71 FINANCE—FA454 TIME 13:16:15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PROM17701/90-7TU—T2731/90' PAGE 0045 DATE b27191------- 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION — — MONTHLY: EXP - — YTD EXPNO. 'ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 303 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND _ .• • 8518 CIP 89-518 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 41W OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 305. 00 O. 00 O. 00 Q. 00 12, 305. 00 O. 0 _ .•_____ ..•...•_• • .. _ • ._ 5400 EQUIPMENT •. _ ___•. • • 5402 EQUIPMENT—MORE THAN $500 O. 00 O. 00 12, 305. 73 O. 00 12, 305. 73-- O. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL - O. 00 O. 00 12, 305. 73 ' 000 12, 305. 73— 0.0 ullo:.' DIVISION TO rAL 12,305.00 0.00 12,305.73 0.00 O. 73— 100. 0 •_• _ ob' DEPARTMENT TOTAL 442, 379. 00 939. 03 27, 704. 78 O. 00 414, 674. 22 6. 2 8601 CIP 86-601 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 41* I .1 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES I i 4201 CONTRACT: SERVICE/PR IVATE ' 4. 000_ 00 0, 00 1, 613_ 00 O. 00 2, 387. 00 461,,I OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4, 000. 00 O. 00 1, 613. 00 O. 00 2, 367. 00 I . [ i DIVISION TOTAL 4, 000. 00 0.00 1, 613. 00 O. 00 2, 387. 00 I i I ' 8604 CIP 86-604 DEPT: — BLDGS & GROUNDS 41W , 4200 CONTRACT' SERVICES . 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 23, 7613. 00 . O. 00 . 0. 00 15, 790. 00 7, 978. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 23, 768. 00 O. 00 0. 00 15, 790. 00 7, 978. 00 • • . . DIVISION TOTAL 23. 768. 00 O. 00 O. 00 15, 790. 00 7, 978. 00 8606 CIP 87-606 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS so • i 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 8.14.00. O. 00: 0.00 0. 00 . 8, 164. 00 , 1 411, . . OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8, 164. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 EL 164. 00 DIVISION TOTAL • 8, 164. 00 O. 00 0 00 0. 00 8. 164. 00 8608 CIP 69-606 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS - lei 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 40. 3 40. 3 40. 3 66 4 66. 4 66. 4 4 5 2 30 ios 10 20 2I 23 2., 2, 54 • • 0.0 1201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 21, 000. 00 0. 00 O. 00 O. 00 21, 000. 00 0.0 •, 1 :::1 F I NANCE-FA454 TIME 13: 16: 15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 305 CAPITAL 'IMPROVEMENT FUND 4200 CONTRACT -SERVICES - OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8609 CIP 89-609 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM -12/01/90 TO- 12/31/90 PAGE 0046 DATE -02/06/91-- 50. 07. OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP.-. -.YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 21, 000. 00 21, 000. 00 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 30, 000. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0. 00 30, 000. 00 21, 000. 00 0. 0 21, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 0 30, 000. 00 0. 00 8615 CIP 89-615 DEPT: BLDGS GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 10, 000. 00 10, 000. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 000. 00 0. 00 8616 CIP 90-616 DEPT. BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 45, 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 45, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8701 CIP 89-701 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DEP T. DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 45, 000. 00 141, 932. 00 OTHER PROJECTS 15, 000. 00 15.000. 00 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 4, 075, 326. 00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. OC) 0. 00 1,613 00 - 0. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 1, 551. 44 0. 00 0. 00 66, 083 Oh 0. 00 15, 790. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 22, 127 20 0. 0 30, 000. 00 - 0. 0 10, 000. 00 10, 000. 00 0.0 0. 0 • 10,•000. 00 0. 0 45,000.00 45, 000. 00 0.0 0. 0 45, 000. 00 0. 0 124, 529. 00 12. 2 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 3, 987, 115. 74 0.0 00 0. 0 0.0 6 10 72 4.4 66 7 41) • Y4k,i1:414z..--,,,:,1A4***041.4Y4NW004010101:46MONAktf--44W44040*.4164.44- • 41 • • FINANCE-FA454 TIME 13:16:15 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 705 INSURANCE FUND 1209 LIABILITY INS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) 'FROM -12/01/90 10-12/31/90 APPROPRTAT ION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1210 AUTO/PROP/BONDS 23, 244. 00 465. 00 465. 00 2, 915. 00 3, 444. 00 30. 533. 00 347.937 00 -- 347, 347, 937. 00 500. 00 365. 00 • __-._ 275. 00 50, 000. 00 51, 140. 00 429, 610. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 35, 480. 00 35. 480. 00 10, 000. 00 10, 000. 00 45, 480. 00 1215 UNEMPLOYMENT DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4186 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL' DIVISION TOTAL 7, 000. 00 7; 000..00 7; 000. 00 MONTHLY ERP YTD EXPND. 1, 086. 50 0.00 0.00 236. 57 209. 15 2, 332. 22 10,;.219.60. 0. 00 470. 80 1, 141. 14 858. 85 12, 698. 39 19, 610. 56 " 309, 374. 04 19, 610. 56 16. 41 0. 00 0. 00 470. 27 486. 6B 22, 429. 46. 0.00 0. 00 119. 53 119. 53 119.53 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 309, 374. 04 52. 85 220. 00 132. 00 22, 487. 12 22, 891. 97 344, 96.1. 40. 22, 200. 07 22, 200. 07 46. 59- 46.59- 22, 153. 48 O. OC) 0. 00 0 00 PAGE DATE 50. 07. OF 0047 YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE. 0. 00 0. 00 o: 00 0. 00 0. 00 0..00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 266. 38 4, 266. 38 4, 266. 38 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 13, 024. 40 465. 00 13. 00- 1, 773. B6 2, 585. 15 17, 034. 61 30, 562. 96 • 38, 562. 96 447.15 145. 00 143. 00 27. 512. 88 28, 248. 03 84, 645. 60 13, 279. 93 13, 279. 93 5, 780. 21 5. 780. 21 - 19, 060. 14 '7, 000. 00 7, 000. 00 7, 000. 00 43. 9 0 0 102.9 39. 1 24. 9 41...5. 88. 9 88. 9 10. 5 60. 2 48. 0 44. 9 44. 7 80. 2 62. 5 62. 5 42. 1 42. 1 58. 0 0. O 0.0 0 0 3 2 10 11 13 19 10 1 (NANCE A454 TIME 13 16 15 ' (:I I Y (ii HERMOSA 111 -ACI I EXE' ND1 TUBE SUMMARY REPORT ( 13Y FUND) PAGE 0040 FROM 12/01/90 TO 1p/21/90 DATE 02/06 /91 50. u'' OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV 11I3.JT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE % '05 IN;it!RAN(.F FUND 1-217 WORKERS COMP DEPT. MOI° T/SUPPORT, 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/M113C 4110 VACATION/SICK F'AY 01-F 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIREMENT 4102 WORKERS COMP -CURRENT YR 4100 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL-. 4700 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4731 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING (JOJECT SUB FO -FAL I)1VIS1011 I(11AI 29, 64E3 0() 593. (,o 593.00 3, 718. 1)0 202, 000 00 5, 704. 00 242 :336 U0 31, 023. 00 1, 077. 00 32, 100. 00 700 00 1 , 220." 0(1 1, 420 00 ;7'7:7/ 11'i(, MEDICARE DEP I MCMI /SUPPOR1 1100 PERSONAL_ SERVICES 41139 MEDICARE I3ENEF T IS IIR.!ECf SUB IC1EAl_ DIVISION (OIAI_ DEP AR (MEN] TOTAL FUND TOTAL. REPORT TOTALS 39, 333. (10 39, 333 (8) 2, 426. 00 0. 00 0. 00 304. :22 10, 304. 00 347. 52 13, 381. 74 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 3. 84 0.00 3 134 13, 4l:). 57 Cl 00 470. 00 1 , 173 99 86, 196. 54 1, X96 06 103, 76 :19, 0,73 (12 (1 00 17, 073 0P 144.92 71. 1'37 7:21. 79 1 ..Il:'i `FS. :3. 256. 10 'I, 256. 10 19, 6.:' t 03 19, 6:31. 03 0. 00 16, 234. 43 45. 2 O 00 x:93. 00 0 0 O 00 114. 20 F30 7 0. 00 2, 244. 01 39 6 0. 00 115, 203. 46 42. 9 0. 00 4, 187 /4 27. 6 0. 00 138, 576. 24 42 8 0. 00 11, 949. 98 61. 4 0. 00 1, 077. 00 0 0- 0. 00 13, 026. 90 59. 4 0. 00 50..08 74 9 0. 00 648. 13 46 8 O. 00 698. 21 50 8 0.(:)0 152, ''• 1. 43 4.1 7 0. 00 O 00 19, 701. 97 49 9 /01. 97 49 <; 39, :333 (10 . 3, 256. 10 19, 6:+t 03 0 OU 19, /01. 97 797, 279 00 3'?, 190.67 :510, 71(C). 40 4, 266. :30 282, 709. 14 797, 279. 00 39'," 190. 67 :31 0. 303 40 4, 266 3F3 28.2, 709 14 25, 061, 781..00 1, 146, 900. 53 10, 04I, 87,7 26 85, 861. 48 14, 934, 062. 26 49 '7 64 64 5 40. 4 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council (CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF JANUARY 2 SUBJECT: February 7,. 1991 Regular Meeting of February 12, 1991 1991) APPOINTMENT OF HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HIP) TASK FORCE MEMBERS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL PURPOSE: TO NOMINATE AND APPOINT MEMBERS Recommendation Nominate members from the attached list of applicants. Background/Analysis As of February 7 the City has not received any more applications than the thirty (30) which were received by January 22, 1991. As the Council is aware the deadline has been extended to February 12, 1991. The list of applications received so far is attached, separated into geographical areas. CONCUR: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager 1 Michael Schubadh Planning Director p/ccsrtask SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE APPLICANTS' NOMINATION LIST Choose two applicants from each area, since more applications may be received by January 22. Staff does not recommend appointing architects, particularly those that have business within Hermosa Beach, since it has the appearance, if not in fact, of a conflict of interest via pecuniary interest with their clients. Staff intends to provide written invitations to in -town architects to attend the meetings and provide their expert testimony. SOUTHWEST (WEST OF LOMA, SOUTH Ron L. Riggs Gregg A. Plouff Richard H. McCurdy Elizabeth Harris Lisa Lucke OF PIER) 143 Manhattan Avenue. 218 8th Street 186 2nd Street 416 Monterey Boulevard 531 Pier Avenue #60. VALLEY SOUTH (BETWEEN P.C.H. AND LOMA SOUTH OF PIER) Julius JR Reviczky J. Mike Ludwig Rosamond d'Orlaque Fogg Joseph Di Monda (EAST 600 Ardmore Avenue 1050 Ardmore Avenue 610 6th Street 610 9th Street SOUTHEAST OF P.C.H., SOUTH OF AVIATION) Botica Pavle Julian Katz Rebecca S. Goldstein M.D. Gerald W. Compton Fred Vendrick Michael S. Meyers Jean A. Donatelli Sam Edgerton 1205 11th Street 1125 9th Street 1203 10th Street 832 7th Street 441 Hollowell Avenue 1104 1st Street 456 Ocean View Avenue 1118 2nd Street NORTHEAST (EAST OF P.C.H., NORTH OF AVIATION) Bob McEachen Mike Disbolis Jacqueline J. Grijalva 901 21st Street 956 14th Street 1532 Silver Street VALLEY NORTH (BETWEEN PCH & LOMA N. OF PIER TO GOULD & BETWEEN PCH & VALLEY N. OF GOULD) John Wisdom Steve Reid Lisa S. Miscione Warner P. Lombardi Timothy H. Hart Ted Dalton Steven C. Crosby 522 24th Place 625 24th Street 585 20th Street 1849 Valley Park Drive 542 24th Street 529 24th Place 531 24th Street NORTHWEST (N. OF PIER & W. OF LOMA TO GOULD, & W. OF VALLEY FROM`GOULD N.) Daniel J. Janotta Dean Nota Katharine Bergstrom 247 29th Street 2467 Myrtle Avenue 32 21st Street HJ•f'1 IC4' /0W/ 7 ''LI4* 14-01)1(81 R6y(71 69 Aces ,x,-13 R V,4(2 y / /p/ Oowwi i — ary fiv ,,,, Ac671 a 'TY oi" 116ef ,9 2r 1315 VALL67 SRn.b /16-1•4192P 90.2.ry „4„. ('\rte. RECEIVED FES 0 4 1991 enEY MCR OFFICE 77' 86176-2 PVIZ171:(1. 70 "y-ro , 1-6,-4s/NG 17riPRov6Y1v,vi PROG2t9M . ?Lung 711s Lb77 w►7)t77W p9CKEr ilsoi Fog "Thr S'Q`L6�C.7Jn/ of Tr' p31K fee Saf ai):WL61 "(Vow fag 7/r prei.u/ey 42 M6 7744, aver AGAR) 77( ('/3C. 7 /6 T`a - 1/4/24Y 44 Po L/CrA 6 7: . faa. rr �7'W of 7FN a a, ?/ wits/tidoMR.67 : J - wAs NOT C-0 Gr6- oN( '7r Qb'4.67i%, C 0?fi e' j ' 774.1 70 77.I - roc r e -7/17- 7T m6 R5/1 . N TIJr alio 770r ... hw1 s7 rr-ry 71./17 - mfr - 67-- -7-6P ofr,&) LoA) 7H " l-1.5:71- L drr L"4GS r1163: 'T� 5"' M i�SI�N,,t f 77' �'- "' s /Y16'v a,7 mac,-- -T 2. 6 7.z / Y �/ A z Xtr CoP163% O"f 77 ',1" ''! /�;�,' Vl.'' )1, fir 7 J - 69161,'Cl'ti7'> 7J/!S ..173-01 tj.)!1S CotJ -1.;Yv () U)7) 6 t ►) /71/ o tf / 776 're 1; c( C t 0 `1 P i C ..,) 79 fr.)(c Mf S .1.3r?i)/9S "5-1-L. -S OIL &Cii J 17 / ;) r, j /N fj LL loiiC rv6 ' FOR. Tri C13 Via9/ m , 77i.) op) Tt.ft-c r Cv„,77",. 1d-- r;'t� 1(' eFty NQ `. yam. t 1 ) I I...►"'. W R 4 s.: 1-11!_c. f t-T/T) J7 fl( 1}��" /? 6.-/ T -0 f S�mC T' LSF vNLy /� S5 ` , : ' /$ 6/4 mit cLasd ce &C) U b ('r~ o'1':'; 17(-- e L.o,S1 gOL ?Pn16-,' W1 4tiSAZ 71)� " %J-rPi br;PbIctAJ �P�eocb S ; r" 11 t 7711,5126' _ is s`om . --'tib 1 ei 77J 171A7 fr _FogM VF. pit 6'1.1&vole/ Vor7w6- . IS 711 Nv FLAcE 0 Lir of Pu 81. lC VV 61,1.) 411/4). _774A-7- I s . V 0 (Gr. .� O S }{ pug- ,r- m17o J . Rfs uc73 6im1L 4L6 W86771 -a. p ti7or You off. Ko OovV 67 - �t�Nsrb� S -71-/!s .Vor i'VG fRo f sR.J -To mom' °t° S 6S L n T7(7N aF , 7�`! '" -Pie-owA) be, -)3414 As . A Fac 7 s b P.. (5•E77AG /N Noc&sc .13(0.F ANS .Spetp,. (_77ti6 rr 2+r" Jry .77rc` 011. 6- oF_ SQA vv _MIT t`\PPLI Cri7wNg• .40(.4cb C4N77NGI r : a 4250-- Acc 6-prri. ?' 70 77- ' fl 7t fr- 42- ?/ m 6 ,v6- Mb 77JA 771 fir ? s" . S 7eFF is g cor»rnbvv /NG AGP/Nsr 620-111 TE"crs _ 430 v6- av -77167. conn m i_71 -F j AM) 711,9r fit'" ' .a /vr .Q ci A)40 pcs 1„bv'S ✓N 7-CitjJ t r S "T0Lb _i y .CNV Co v L Y?br/26y2 II wr Nar kiIV`rr 3(1U 25. ons pier commis -5") iStirVAr,� .CovGd 1)N, riPPLY. Now ,SOM S AbL )770NR, L ii--ws i16 -corn to oo4 cq,(' (e. c � 2 ao+vs trz A77 Di. 1 ; )41614&ST fl Pi 0A) T 6 -An /7,/ TRf iV17.° r4 Fre-1 f/ .7UiS :B &,Cr1 7b wPJ -.IS Nor. /loci 9_14 ._ 77/ cardctS X0.0 'Ttit 7; Frcr 77/6- 1007-6-Alpf . - fo a c000: Al b -def , 0/.62Df 1 T /N mr .bov.mptiwk) fiRn1.3 bF_ 077C ,r s77125S ofG' oN.S Teti C77 tA1 AJo to 7/US--- AffPoOor 1.6 , 77/ 020/ow s Fr 1-07-6-2- O b. r com e ' w�cL b-)A,J?fL PO) OC30 7iaC TA1PS 07/ /1O/i /1 EYv Tei sir;&w jvuS brwf)Te 'ti "" 19N� 6R677- PO Tb-Nvnt pig LA14 St4SP.N EBF HOW (r)PN't a 7716 x" t is O T..5 W! L 1. 7?I& c.17 7—txo 7 ;l 1 ow (1i)N'4 .SoT9 or CopaG7"uiLS wt1;1, 4r cg>gr�tktuA ;Ntf Pkro R -TD AN y O 1-Ift/ /,v -a ON N 6 A owns TSN ? _ � Ttlr. cuRAIT uL 7R-}}'P_0(o )77_, )7/67- s 7/I S e771? `Tb a r' f Lr? C'NG- o7/ fin 1b v47741....1:tot, 1 -?ON //t/r OJu n2 4§g -3 is ICC- to 'IQ c oa e- P Ec c.M ffinvil qr Th E. ENT e T Pct N . r 1 1) / t7Y2 + S tri v b tV7`7 L o .V v Tb �, " 3�/l' `�f.�,1 NGT 17 li%t- ` A tr H A C "`� �� l ; �?J � �N� ��N/�✓� 77/612 d c *fried 4^1 -fps /HIP) COMA.. 4 .r ,q yr c)4) V t) .S Nuny e 2 oas PRnPb'g77 OWN (f62 -e:1 . — C nu LS Nor . o& E.T;'f'�" 1M6/mitt RciS7IItm77f1tr CoA1/ti')iv-ar -75 mr TX is .JS Ic1973S I( Ogg- 6,D$ IN 77/ 1,661)C S6 TION g6 -el b - M as 6" aN 0 j -f r s 2 t4)60 -gr ,Sant(=-1.-tijtir OF /9 Frl) L (4 R F , 77/6-°r— /Tr -E vel_g vu. ' } 16v .65-61) S 6-147 A po .LSI SW& Er bu'f `f).N / f4 'r 11ou A{2 /you) ? dd%N'J/! f .O QN- VALur 77/Vie )N1/ rY f AP0 /96niN, x pt?: PCS':. Jr 77,11( (26—sue:S /N /00 7o /S� � /`1� 60c4.62, litC`; )_ ) N 7 /a'� !delwr.. pF:_ +g itis PRO f w7r — `J ) f, a ?3 5' GO6 I G 70 /k)filc'r te)- 2 ei LL 1 ani uCTyO,) ,N /('w Cr `;)a— C. l r/, N O " 6 L .E I L L I C71J . (7LL/9g P56(11.1iNG--)td1)4 /P) )4)P) .616c77cWC, IF 777 ego cb's ?SI 7 MO L1 E' f P tiv r(4 77a Lf..) 77-76`S 6PPI, Nb vc 4 H /yt?►/ ' ,T s7 JS'- /Y?►tkf J /ti.),)/N _pu. LZ. -To F,VSYJ6 2. f ' ►"`° . '► -a1' ; 70 fog G /)? f .. ►c VES q V cS 77ONS 4VH t1t;• cifot of - /'v6I,�;,%e of Mnilir f� C . s7? ' S & of ON/Iv. , sr" ‘t)o Jt\J 7 66r EXPac S cl 9- f o 2 A Coy sate'"4/1. OR w AT -IJ -Di 671 F&Z , 1 o �'',;� u o vA ?RoP'6gT t? gC S ' ` �'1� 1 ��'�-�?e,r1�', C - wnAr IS (10vt,e KtiavL17—te Co N C5PT ofFFb 77 aF at/Iwo/A/6. S ETL P'L�:_ b` e, -- o 1/0,(,! L f c;2 s A4 19)s,C MrINi P 5-N C/ F7 --a I 771 .43 e oM mi J /F Fo i i 6`-t m /4,61).,1147 -- /Ts fok mm- 70N SNoq l . Nor ter f} . T 'oec6` OF eouNero.ni rna 0y2 CreoNi g nN.1 fpio1Ss, if �1g % b'N 7 /1'`l 77/0.---S re.6c 770N :; F S ► ► a aQ tIRT P1utL 7716r. 6 P6wLoir } Pi9' 1✓G v c<;'o✓077kcz 64115e (S IS No -7— 6- Po c.l r, %C y 0o rr rn='fir-. ALL. 1 Q77NG- muST 6r- -rel 5 Y E R 11� � G- VLu f} 's SI -r . ,cf:co v oN 77!rs _ar- FULL Y com PirigNoi7 X,C 'kb -19 L - f.-71)71-/6AzA-_Y S c 7` K 016/ L cohaCGP7S 6C"'71) N) LN.G-) ,IN, i anyoe ._, SScO'S .. .77/647r - 10t or '-1-(g7" r A corn ca_ po 'SoN5 ORDN Y, cte s o/Y?c oNr T705 D�! f r 6 NO6h8 c1:4 t'oo, 1' Ny HPPI.ICPw TS cNANCgS WAS 77JLS "fR6Urnw ey" VOT7A -, u4,v r %'1x10 77ON rA 14:737---7a CONT7N ur rs ( 7Th (JNL . gac o w4, i,b � �1 P- -- b,RoPPN6 6 o r rcSLY. E ,-C f*;'W PS )O w p ro /6=1)/ (c DdmNN-2�,,RL 1 PRovewlarr' f Rockeff VfVIn7Ps- eR 3�o'cI t . ,o771 )N pAtei tt 6�. c iy'/ (rop.. p - :,/ t' 0Iv c o lnu'r v c.77 OA) _ CF .c 177 _ H V/NG- 115-67-1-7 -6 ffT& e A A) .30 ft ok b -F V 1 / LEVR-. = VAGr You To MA I r 21.1 2r FV T7/,'N� yo k c om SPL t G}Pt, e-orn -PL y L- --J' S 6 otk6 c oA g Grr 1-10f/r; _Ts 7h1 s y 0 ' A /N Tb i T1 WV) . ° R. 60 y J f4 F61&.1- _ -`(o ter .b. o/ N ucH- OO fo cci a C!TI,. 77;677 . yob'CGS .t� A)O7 • f,:sS !S C y bo te)Ai W4, ONC • .1 Az '7}315 1N ALL654I gN6�`S. +._ T• 77-1 St, GN::a Y, � v � S61 U6' TJ o � T �', Y`i1 f� /�:1 FU X21? 2'.� AN ASL /f!1� fit, February 7, Honorable Mayor and Members City Council of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 12, SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON THE CITY'S AQMD REGULATION XV TRIP REDUCTION PLAN Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Council receive and file this supplemental report. Background: 1991 Meeting 1991 Staff submitted a status report of the City's AQMD'Regulation XV - Trip Reduction Plan at the January 22-, 1991 meeting. At that time the item was continued to the February 12, 1991 meeting. Analysis: As stated in the January 22nd agenda item, the status report was to advise Council of activity ,which has taken place since the City's Trip Reduction Plan was approved by the Council and submitted to the AQMD. Following AQMD's approval of the plan on November 2, 1990, staff took the implementation actions outlined in the staff report. Impact of implementation of the incentives is to be reported to the Council at the conclusion of six months following AQMD approval (report in June 1991). Subsequent to the Council meeting of Jan. 22nd, staff distributed survey forms to all employees for participation in Commuter Computer and to survey current participation in alternative modes of transportation. The results of that survey indicated the following results. The current results are compared to the results of the initial survey completed last June. SUPPLEMENTAL. INFORMATION Mode Number Participating June 90 Jan 91 2 person Carpool 2 3 Walk 6 1 Bike 3 3 Public Transit 2 0 Respectfully Submtted: Robert A. Blackwood, Personnel Director pc/aqmd February 5, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 12, 1991 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING CITY DISPLAY OF SUPPORT FOR TROOPS INVOLVED IN THE PERSIAN GULF WAR Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize placing of yel- low ribbons around the Civic Center and such other public facili- ties as appropriate. Background: On the January 22, 1991 Council meeting, in response to. a sugges- tion by citizen Betty Martin, the Mayor directed staff to research costs and the manpower.. needed to fly our United States flags on light poles as currently done on patriotic holidays. The intent was to recognize our City's interest and concern for troops involved in the Persian Gulf War. Analysis: At least two area cities - Lawndale and El Segundo - have chosen to fly their holiday flags continuously. While it appears an, obvious, appropriate act of patriotism, the staff has identified other factors to be considered, including: 1) The putting up of flags would no doubt be as symbolic as taking them down. It is possible that prisoners of war and/ or other involvements could go on for a considerable period of time, which would mean the flags may require flying for many months if not years. 2) It is a national issue viewed differently by our citizens and by citizens across the country. Flying of the flag could be misinterpreted by some to represent a position on a national issue, which has been avoided by our Council in the past. Many of our citizens have flags for display on patriotic holidays, and each can make their decision indi- vidually as to whether or not to display the flag. 3) The City began flying the flags to add a festive nature to patriotic holiday weekends. Continuous flying of the utili- ty pole flags would not serve this purpose. The Board of Supervisors has by motion asked all County residents to wear or display a yellow ribbon until each of ourmen and women who have been deployed in Saudi Arabia and each American citizen are accounted for and return to Ameri- can soil safely. 5) Flying of our current utility pole flags continuously will cause extra wear and tear on the flags. It is estimated the flags may have to be replaced as often as monthly at a cost of over $1,800 plus at least 12 man hours. For these reasons, it appears that use of the yellow ribbon might be a more effective and appropriate method for our government to reflect the interest and concern of our citizens regarding those involved in the Persian Gulf War. The yellow ribbon is symbolic of someone missing who is remembered. The support columns in front of City Hall, the City's flag poles, etc. are well situated to display yellow ribbons, which can be accomplished inexpensively. Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ ld Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council (CONTINUED FROM THE 1/8/91 MEETING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION) SUBJECT: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CON 90-20 LOCATION: 619 10TH STREET APPLICANT/ SOUTH BAY PARTNERS C/O JEFF GREENE APPELLANT: 2306 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: APPEAL OF CONDITION NO. 2 REQUIRING AN AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 10 FEET TO ALLOW A PROPOSED MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK OF 6 FEET February 6, 1991 Regular Meeting of February 12, 1991 AND SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL BACK Planning Commission Recommendation To sustain the Planning Commission's original decision to require an average 10 -foot setback with a minimum of 7 feet by adoption the attached resolution to sustain the P.C. decision. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends either approval of the attached modification agreed to by the neighbor and the architect/developer by adoption of the attached resolution to grant the appeal, or, alternatively to sustain the Planning Commission decision. Background The Planning Commission, at their meeting of February 5, voted. 2-1 to continue to recommend that an average 10 -foot setback be applied consistent with their previous decisions to require 10 -foot setbacks across the street to the south. For further background please refer to the attached Staff Reports and Minutes. Analysis The attached modification proposed by the applicant moves the closest point of the waterfall feature back 6 inches from the applicant's original submittal to a setback of 6 feet, while also shifting the southeast corner of the building back 3 inches to 7' 3". This scheme was worked out by the project's architect as a compromise with the neighbor to minimize the impact on the neighbors view from his front west -facing windows. This commendable effort was in response to the action of the City Council on January 8, 1991. 12 The Planning Commission considered this modification, however, was not satisfied with the compromise because of their desire to maintain consistency with previous decisions on discretionary projects. on this street. Decisions to impose greater setback requirements have been made since August of 1988, consistent with Council action in regards to a similar situation on 15th Street, to maintain some conformity with existing front setbacks on the same block. CONCUR: 4,64,44()(4"-c4L3, /I ? //z7-, Michael Schubach Planning Director Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolutions 2. Applicant's letter, diagram of modification 3. P.C. Staff Report 2/5/91 4. C.C. Staff Report/Minutes 1/8/91 5. P.C. Staff Report/Minutes 11/20/90 6. P.C. Resolution A/pcsr619 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (Proposed Resolution to sustain P.C. decision) RESOLUTION 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #22409, AND PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, THEREBY DENYING THE APPEAL OF CONDITION NO. 2, AT 619 TENTH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 4, BLOCK 78, SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 8, 1991 to receive oral and written testimony regarding an appeal of condition no. 2 of the Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan granted for 619 Tenth Street and made the following findings: A. The maps are consistent with applicable general and specific plans; B. The site is zoned R-2 and is suitable for the type and density of the proposed development; C. The development shall pose no threat to the public safety and welfare; D. The subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; E. The subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; F. Design of the proposed subdivision is compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City's General Plan; G. The Planning Commission's condition of approval No. 2 to require a ten foot average setback for the project is 1 2 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 reasonable for the subject site in consideration of average setbacks on the block, lot depths, and past practices; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve to sustain the Planning Commission's decision to approve a Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Parcel Map, and a Precise Development Plan for a 2 -unit condominium project at 619 Tenth Street subject to the conditions contained in Planning Commission resolutions 90-97. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1991 ATTEST: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28. (Proposed Resolution to grant appeal) RESOLUTION 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF AN APPEAL OF CONDITION NO. 2, IMPOSED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REQUIRE AN AVERAGE 10 -FOOT FRONT SETBACK ON A 2 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM, TO INSTEAD ALLOW A MINIMUM 6 -FOOT FRONT SETBACK AT 619 TENTH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 4, BLOCK 78, SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 8, 1991 to receive oral and written testimony regarding an appeal of condition no. 2 of the Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan granted for 619 Tenth Street and made the following findings: A. The maps are consistent with applicable general and specific plans; B. The site is zoned R-2 and is suitable for the type and density of the proposed development; C. The development shall pose no threat to the welfare; D. The subdivision or type of improvements cause serious public health problems; E. The subdivision or type of improvements F. G. public safety and are not likely to will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision; Design of the proposed subdivision is compatible and consistent with applicable elements of the City's General Plan; The Planning Commission's condition of approval No. 2 to require a ten foot average setback for the project is not 2 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 necessary for the subject site because the existing setback on the adjacent project to the east, and because the proposed design will minimize any view obstruction from said project; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the. City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve to,wsustain the Planning Commission's decision to approve a Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Parcel Map, and a Precise Development Plan for a 2 -unit condominium project at 619 Tenth Street, subject to the conditions in Planning Commission resolution 90-97 with the exception of condition No. 2 which shall be amended to read as follows: 2. The minimum front yard setback shall be six (6) feet, and the front of the building shall be designed in accordance with the attached diagram submitted by the applicant on February 5, 1991. ATTEST-: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1991 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: I 11 tt-40 -d �. r_ I W • i A SOUTH BAY PROPERTY, INC. 2306 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SUITE #307 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 213-376-8130 2-5-91 HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION CIVIC CENTER 1315 VALLEY DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CA R 5 1991 COMMISSIONERS, I HAVE MET WITH THE ARCHITECT AND NEIGHBOR PER THE CITY COUNCILS REQUEST. TOGETHER WE HAVE MADE MODIFICATIONS TO THEFRONTOF THE BUILDING THAT MEETS BOTH OF OUR REQUIREMENTS. THE MEETING WAS AT THE SITE DURING WHICH A FOOTPRINT WAS DRAWN OF THE BUILDING AND A PROFILE WAS ELEVATED REPRESENTING THE FRONT PROJECTION. THE NEIGHBORS VIEW WAS STUDIED FROM ALL WINDOWS AND THEIR ROOF TOP DECK. IT WAS FOUND THAT FROM THEIR ROOF TOP DECK THEIR VIEW WAS NOT AFFECTED FOR THEY ARE HIGHER ON THE HILL. IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT ONE WINDOW AT THEIR ENTRY (WHICH COULD RETAIN VIEW) WAS PARTIALLY OBSTRUCTED. WE RELOCATED THE PROFILE AND FOOTPRINT AND FOUND THAT A FEW MINOR ADJUSTMENTS COULD PRESERVE THEIR VIEW FROM THE PARTIALLY OBSTRUCTED WINDOW AND STILL ACCOMMODATE OUR AFFECTED STAIRCASE. IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT IN MOVING THE BUILDING CORNER BACK FROM THE NEWLY PROPOSED SETBACKS EVEN TO THE 10' SETBACK, THEIR VIEW WAS NOT DRASTICALLY AFFECTED BECAUSE OF THEIR WINDOW PLACEMENT. THE ADJUSTMENTS AREAS FOLLOWS: 1. MOVE THE SOUTH EAST BUILDING CORNER NORTH 3 2. REDUCE THE FOUNTAIN ARC ALLOWING FOR A 6" REDUCTION IN SETBACK THE NEIGHBOR NOW SUPPORTS OUR PROJECT WITH THE ABOVE MODIFICATIONS. STAFFS REPORT NOTES THAT OUR EFFORTS TO MEET THE NEIGHBORS AND COUNCILS NEEDS AND REQUESTS ARE INSIGNIFICANT BECAUSE OF THE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS. I DON'T BELIEVE STAFF IS AWARE THAT: 1. WE HAD .A MEETING OF OVER TWO HOUR WITH THE NEIGHBOR TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE 2. MOVING THE BUILDING SETBACK FROM 6' TO 10 FOOT DID NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT THEIR VIEW. HOWEVER 5.5' TO 6' MADE A MAJOR DIFFERENCE IN VIEW PRESERVATION. 3. THE NEIGHBOR SUPPORTS THE PROJECT. I BELIEVE PER THE ABOVE EFFORTS AND MODIFICATIONS I HAVE MET THE NEEDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF BOTH THE NEIGHBOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. SINCERELY , JEFF D. GREENE Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 5, 1991 City Council Meeting of February 12, 1991 SCHEDULING OF GOALS SETTING SESSION IN FEBRUARY 1991 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council select a suitable date for updating current goals and brainstorming for new goals during the month of February, 1991. Background: The date for this meeting was previously set for February 7, 1991, because I erred in not realizing I would be out of town that evening. The Council Chambers was noticed that this meeting was cancelled, and staff is endeavoring to determine a new date that staff and Council can be in attendance for this process. Analysis: The proposed dates currently.include Wednesday, February 20, and Thursday, February 21. February 18 also would be a possibility, but represents a holiday for City employees and may conflict with some staff members' weekend plans. Please bring your availabili- ty for these dates to the meeting, so that a final date can be determined. Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ld Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council February 5, 1991 City Council Meeting of February 12, 1991 SETTING OF JOINT MEETING WITH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Recommendation: That the City Council propose to the Chamber a joint meeting of the City Council and the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors at 7:30 a.m., Thursday, either April 4 or 18, 1991. Background: In the interest of pursuing the City Council's goal to "take a more active role with the Chamber", the City Council conducted a joint meeting with the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors on February 22, 1990. At that meeting, it was suggested that a meeting approximately every six months occur. The Mayor request- ed that we defer this meeting a little longer until more things were at the point that discussion with the Chamber again would be fruitful. Analysis: Both the City Council and the Chamber of Commerce will be meeting to update their goals and priorities over February and March. This means a meeting in April would be an appropriate timeto hold a joint meeting to develop action plans for implementing the goals of the respective bodies wherever they are compatible and consistent. The Board's regular meetings are on Thursday mornings at 7:30 a.m. The regular meeting for April is scheduled for April 11, but usually includes too many items to be combined with our meeting. 'Kevin B.. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ld Name: 474 THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FE8121991 si --r City Clerk City of Hermosa Beech APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMM OION NAME OF COMMISSION Address: Home Phone 3. 1- -3z-c) LI 3�S rAr0-D e d n ve , \ v -vv cnz ac �n c W ci. c Z L( Occupation or Profession: -I HOV-V\eki Name of Employer: PriU.le1 Y i i c'.iAe Address of Employer: Z3 5C) Cie for L UU Business Phone. t50 -s ICS Tokr gra ince C W cC G5 REFERENCES: Local: A 11 Professional: t\\icJkiln c")O0,, Other: vt 5OE �JOV� ' lM COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE: U\\\\( `7'xjLl �1 p 1(1 1) 3 1 WLP U1 l�c?t JUS PIT `� 1�v �1`� ll)`ClU ` V19\(\ *• 5 Ce Why do'you wish to become a Commission Member? tea Oevvvic5A3C'_dc,i ex e_CA 10 A - lce G What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Member? What are your present civi , fraternal or professional memberships and obligations?1� 1 �eYJ ab 1%�2 1 '� � a � C�'> iM V1n l� An,1 L �� r I l� ��rk 06-k 6\4 SUPPLEMENTAL LEMENTAL INFURMAIION. Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? VAD Please give a resume fo your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. -iCL c\ T. This Commission meets on �e6 cAtO at 1 �� P.M. Do you foresee any 1 scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? VIo. How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? •3 ulea r� Comments : Signe . -Q < Date: Received: Name: THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO NAME _OF COMMISSION �ia/ ill FEB 111991 a MUNICIPAL CO ,SIGN 6� \/ rn Home Phone •377 ._ /,3'9 ,gyp ..�A City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach Address: Yif.f ZS 57e7L Occupation or Profession: Name of Employer: /rico /vic26-J\ s Address of Employer: ZOO/ : Cl/F yc G �po2z REFERENCES: Local: 23//✓Sc v Business Phone �S� (ZO Professional: 6';.c. Other: WI /L1c ifif COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE: 27.-X V71i1a1'� (;)0,00/2/47 . /4"/C1 G04 4,;� (S c / i/) Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? -T7/1.091,f cam, f�tL IIA'( u D Csb )91477 (/4(L Z/ CEJ ( /3f osu What do you feel are VoVc'c='la. the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Member? What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and G S 1)12 (a "Wr frL obligations? 04 a OP • _., Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so,'what are they?. NG Please give a resume fo your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. This Commission meets on -4,E5/1 3 scheduling problems that t /! make you miss meetings? iVQ t h, P.M. Do you foresee any How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? /6C -7/i5 Signed:. Date: 2-&--7/ Received: Mayor and Members of the City Council February 6, 1991 City Council Meeting February 12, 1991 VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PLANNING COMMISSION ONE VACANCY - TERM ENDING JUNE 30, 1992 A vacancy has arisen on the Planning Commission due to the resignation of Edmund M. Aleks (see attached letter dated January 31, 1991). Background: At its meeting of September 25, 1990, the City Council appointed Mr. Aleks to the Planning Commission to fill an unexpired term ending June 30, 1992. There are currently three applications on file for appointment to the Planning Commission: Gila Katz, Julius (J.R.) Reviczky, and Glenn R. Tanner. (As of this writing, Ms. Katz and Mr. Reviczky. have expressed interest; direct contact with Mr. Tanner has not yet been made, but phonemessages have been left.) Recommendation: Accept with regret the resignation of Edmund Aleks, and take appropriate action to fill the vacancy. Alternatives: 1. Appoint from among the remaining applications on file. (attached). 2. Direct the City Clerk to advertise and request additional applications from interested persons. Concur: fv2 Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Elaine Doerfling,"City lerk 14 a \, ) \I( 1 I. RECEIVED FEB 0 4 1991 CITY MGR. OFFICE Mayor Chuck Sheldon, and Members of the City Council City Hall City of Hermosa Beach Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Thu, Jan 31, 1991 di�,L�.Ij/ �j •_ \`. pit Jig _d.� <<� FEBO51991 -1‘ Ctty Ckrk City of Hermos. B.icH Dear Mayor Sheldon and Members of the City Council:`(;; I am submitting my resignation from the Planning Commission as I have recently moved to my new home in Pacific Palisades. I appreciated having the opportunity to serve as it was an immensely satisfying experience for me. Mike and the rest of the planning staff were always helpful and my hat is off to their efforts. I also received a great deal of enjoyment from working with my colleagues on the commission, all of whom are intelligent, dedicated people who deeply care about their community. Thank you again and I wish all of you the very best. Very truly yours, Edmund M. Aleks • Name: THE CITY Of HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL CO NAME OF COMMISSION g4,ti,u/AiC l.G'/YI/17/55/G4 6/4.A �'f'ATZ Address: //c.5- A/,,vr71 nee Occupation or Profession: f /Uri, Name of Employer: }u G /d�5 IJD iaTERVI E4). nit'VEh_ 8-i SEP 05 1990 ► 2 S I ON cyty cMr4 City of M.rmo.. Beach Hao f- pno►JE t37s1- 744:" (c'C1AciS% Address of Employer: 44)6 ,541.0 /i15 /%3-576 Oz 9 9/9 S - 9600 c REFERENCES: Local: .1.e ✓ Professional: Other: 4,fia AnY,v..i) Business Phone .33a--6-30/ 0-7/6 -5-7‘/ COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE: ..J G.i GAJ Why doyou wish to become a Commission Member? Ag cruise As F A ieccs 1)[JT / 7/Aal _Z7 ha v a s7kc /,J What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission. Member? /1 /77/7) 6e4e. S%ou /c//i o /c/ a.u, off.) ,17/ > u �� /Ssc,_° Q fFScev/Ed AS 'de )4/ a// s/dgS 6/ //>� to What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations? .1— /2 .PQ's&.0 / Ite5 //2 /7)/emvY heal) 5 M716 ,2 Aid nal -to ./ 0 aAh. 4-c‘41-3 mss` ,71s 11 C/ Prr, Ar-/ ✓ ,4770A) Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? AA) Please give a resume fo your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. a teF(kr 17 C ti' This Commission meets on at P.M. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? ti1a How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Comments: RSet a c. A Q e4Km rrrn,, &)o u L c/ /, k J A c /. ,(f 4 . , 71 'tea. f 41 Signed: "' ' . /c - Date: me/lat ,S"� Received: GILA J. R. KATZ 1125 Ninth Street, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213)374-7405 OBJECTIVE: To obtain a management position within a Human Resources Organization utilizing my experi- ence in recruiting/candidate selection, creative strategic planning, implementing solutions and measuring results in support of company goals. EDUCATION: • MA Counseling and Psychotherapy, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, 1972 — Minor in Psychometry. — Master Thesis: Analytical and Statistical Data, and Protective Techniques. — Doctoral Thesis: Verification and Validation of Communication Techniques. — Dean's list. • Bachelor of Education, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, 1965. — Staff Member, Dean of Students, 1964-1965. New York State permanent teaching license. EXPERIENCE: • K. Robert Brian Inc., 1987 Present Professional Recruiter. Managed a fast pace environment at the Westchester office. Re- sponsible for development of Aerospace client base and candidate selection and referral. Currently filling positions for Mitre, Contel, Sanders, Grumman, Rockwell International Corporation, GE and ESL. Grew Aerospace business from zero to $300K in yearly billings over two year period. • Purcell Group, 1985 - 1987. Professional Recruiter. Responsible for recruiting scientific software developers. Billings - $150K per year. Won three sales awards in 1986 - First full year with Purcell. • Smyrna School District, Smyrna, Delaware, January 1984 1985. School Licensed Psychologist, Licensed Psychometrist, Public Liaison. — Serve children on referral basis from kindergarten through and including high school. — Evaluate students. Develop strategies for remedial programs. — Implement programs with parents, teachers and school staff to coordinate efforts and to increase student productivity. — Follow-up and measure results of implemented programs. • CaldwellTemporary Agency, Wilmington, Delaware, 1983 - 1984. Account Executive. - Responsible for developing and marketing Corporate Accounts in Wilmington area. • Mutual of New York, Wilmington, Delaware, 1977 = 1983. Field Underwriter and Registered Representative. — First person to obtain "Top Fifty Sales Club" in Delaware, 1981, 1980. - First person awarded "President's Club" in Wilmington. Awarded "Man of the Year", 1981. - Member of the President's Council, Top Club, Million Dollar Round Table. • "New Woman" Radio Program, Station WDEL, 1980 - 1981. Originator, Director and Producer. - Regular scheduled half-hour program with focus on current issues and new career patterns for women. - Maintained ongoing communications with guidance counselors and career developers in public schools. - Analyzed short and long range program needs. - Implemented programs. - Planned and designed strategies. - Evaluated results against goals. • Association for Children with Learning Disabilities, 1973 - 1.977. Educational Diagnostician. - Responsible for testing and evaluation. remediation and development of new educa- tional foremats for children with learning disabilities. LANGUAGES: Fluent in German MEMBERSHIPS: • Smyrna Legislative Review Committee. • National Association of School Psychologists. Kent County Association of School Psy- chologists. • Staff of Wilmington Medical Center. Department of Psychiatry. • Mental Health Association of Delaware. Public Information Committee. • Board of Housing Opportunities of Northern Delaware. Personnel Development Commit- tee. • Delaware Alliance of Professional Women. Wilmington Women in Business. • Ramblewood Civic Association, President. Member Brandywine Council of Civic Associ- ations. • Planned Parenthood Association. • Malvern Planning Commission REFERENCES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. THE CITY Of HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL CO NAME OF COMMISSION Name: Address: 6 c 2 it CI "}-7c", tCE1Vi, ., 6-i AUG 291990 - S I ON C,t, ovk aty of N.rno.+ 9..a. Occupation or Profession: f&cLAI_,c„}( /te11.4",LI_t Name of Employer: ; -SAS O FC.ct.,c(L Address of Employer: J,kyoo Alo 4.f K.4 1 — REFERENCES: Loca 1: Professional: Other: f.tn..t 4.1 C .a Business Phone efAE -c ycc cn,L 37r/ -6.Z4 7 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE: /was/ f�c.rtc..� �iv.• , ✓( Lr?��r— '# t•'1 /4„-.34-4- /mss .ftt << e,‹ 4 • h44t; co /- 17-14s k•L /4P1 -4--e 14 6,44L. 64,41 L F Ate (t�s ;,c Why do yob wish to become a Commission Member? pct Cnph el.'T What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Member? What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations? , iKc,t 4 -1 t algia L j h,44.- 4-5(34./4//o•--• 14� •_ / i (:374 . Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? ^�v Please give a resume fo your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. This Commission meets on at 7.'.10 P.M. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? /t/.:: How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Comments: Signed: Date: Received: g/.07/9e, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMISSION NAME OF COMMISSION: Planning Name: Address: Occupatign: Employer: Work Address: Work Phone: REFERENCES: Local: Professional: Other: Glenn R. Tanner 170 Manhattan Av. Consulting Engineer Self (Glenn R. Tanner Home Phone: 372-1612 Hermosa Beach CA 90254 Consulting Engineer) 170 Manhattan Av. Hermosa Beach CA 90254 376-0047 Wesley Bush, H.B. Chamber of Commerce Richard Eckfield, Power Link Services, 818- 546-5065 David Nordquist, Home phone: 322-0131 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE: 1. Initiator and director of El Segundo Chamber of. Commerce "Main Street Run 5 & 10K", 1984 - 1990. 2. Director of El Segundo Police Officers Association "Roger's Run" 5K scheduled for October 14, 1990. Why do you want to be a Commission Member ? I like Hermosa Beach very much and want to preserve the feeling of a close knit beach community. Consequently, I am interested in having some influence in the direction the city will take in the future. While most existing zoning, planning, and conditional use permit regulations are satisfactory, there is room for both more active enforcement of existing regulations, and the need for further definition in some areas. I believe my experience as a leader in private enterprise, as an engineer and manager, plus my current occupation as a self employed business person, lends itself to the application of these areas and will be asset to the City of Hermosa Beach. APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT ... Page 2 What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Member ? Duties: Meet twice per month. Work with City Staff to understand issues and .regulations. Hear public testimony. Review, prior to meetings, information regarding current issues which include conditional use permits, building plans, and zoning. Responsibilities: Represent the citizens of Hermosa Beach in the planning process. Define specific applications in a consistent manner with regard to current rules and regulations. Promulgate new regulations that alter existing regulations or set new directions. What are your present civil, fraternal, or professional memberships and obligations ? 1. California registered professional Mechanical Engineer. 2. Member of Association of Energy Engineers, Southern California Chapter. Meets once per month at lunchtime. 3. Chairman of University of Southern California Engineering Alumni Association Recruiting Committee. Meets once per month at varying times. Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interest ? None. Please give a resume of your education, employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission Member : Please refer to the attached resume. I have over thirteen years in positions of increasing responsibility with Chevron USA, Inc. and Pacific Energy - Central Plants, Inc. (a subsidiary of Pacific Enterprises). Ultimately responsible for a staff of over twenty-five people, an annual budget of $10 million, and assets of over $85 million. Since, June, 1990, I have been the owner of a consulting engineering company: Glenn R. Tanner - Consulting Engineer. I specialize in energy, environmental, and project engineering. A list of available services is also attached. APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT ... Page 3 This commission meets on the 1st and 3rd Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 PM. Do you foresee any scheduling problem that might make you miss meetings ? None. How long have you Iived in Hermosa Beach ? Since February,. 1987 (Three years and six months). Comments: I look forward to meeting with you in person to discuss this application and to ultimately serve as a Planning Commission member. Signed: Date: Received: Glenn R. Tanner g/s� Aes GLENN R . TANNER , P . E . Consulting Engineer 170 Manhattan Avenue Hermosa Beach CA 90254 213-376-0047 Scope of Available Services: Energy Ent2ineering: Industrial: ,Commercial: * Feasibility studies for cogeneration, district heating & cooling (DHC) plants. * Cogeneration & DHC plant design. * Engineering & economic analysis of third party proposals for developers & owners. * Building cooling & heating alternatives analysis and in -building plant design. * Energy audits 5 energy reduction plans. * Thermal Energy Storage analysis and designs. Environmental Engineering: * Boiler NOx reduction alternatives & design. * Underground storage tank compliance projects. * Underground piping inspection and repairs. * Contaminated soils remediation & hazardous materials projects. Plant Operations and Maintenance: * Plant efficiency analysis and improvement plans for both commercial and industrial power & heating / cooling plants. * Plant operating manuals, start-up assistance & emergency procedures. * Preventative & predictive maintenance programs. Project Engineering: * Design & construction of mechanical systems projects for the energy production / hydrocarbon processing industries. GLENN GLENN R TANNER P. E. 170 Manhattan Avenue Hermosa Beach CA 90254 213-376-0047 Summary of Experience: Thirteen years of experience in general plant management, engineering supervision, project management, project engineering, design engineering, plant operations, maintenance, and Inspection far the petroleum refining and district heating & cooling industries. Major strengths are: Team Building, Training, Development Management of Multiple Disciplines * Communication Ability * Contracts /.Negotiations * Program Implementation * Technical Expertise Education and Professional: * Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering - University of Southern California * California Registered Professional Mechanical Engineer, M-20147 Employment History: Pacific Energy / Central Plants. Inc. (CPVI - Responsible for all aspects of operations and.maintenance for three plant locations (replacement value: $85 million) comprising 38,000 installed cooling tons; 50 million annual sold ton -hours; yearly expense budgets totaling $10 million; combined crew of 25 people with 3 supervisors. Manager - Engineering & Construction - Responsible for the overall performance of the CPI Engineering & Construction group which includes Process Engineers, Project Engineers, ' Construction Coordinator, Designers, and Technical Assistants. Projects included cogeneration / DHC plant design,' environmental projects, and energy improvements. Chevron USA Inc. El Segundo Refinerv: :Responsible for environmental projects in $10 million dollar per year program as Project r -• •r- .f Supervised equipment inspection group as Lead Equipment Inspector. Improved refinery maintenance methods, implemented chemical cleaning group, hired technicians, and performed as plant shutdown foreman as ,Maintenance Supervisor. Completed projects over $1 million as Major Projects Engineer. :erformed capital budgeting and definition of large projects as Facilities Planning Engineer. Hired 31 new engineers (a. record) as Recruiting Coordinator. Design & construction of capital & maintenance projects as Design Engineer in Catalytic Cracking Unit, Catalytic Reformer, Low Sulfur Fuel Oil`Division, Alkylation plant, and gasoline / ammonia loading racks. Personal: * Chairman of USC Engineering Alumni Association Student Recruiting Committee. * Initiator & director of El Segundo Chamber of Commerce Annual Main Street 5 & 10K. * Former principle of "Runners image", direction & marketing for running events. February 5, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of February 12, 1991 PETITION FROM BUSINESSES REGARDING THE PARKING LOT ON THE 200 BLOCK: OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Recommendation: It is recommended the City. Council review this requested infor- mation and direct staff to investigate and develop recommenda- tions for further action as appropriate. Background: At the City Council's January 22, 1991 meeting, Mayor Pro Tem Midstokke requested that the background regarding a petition originally submitted ;by Jim Brisson on behalf of Pacific Coast. Highway businesses be provided the City Council. Analysis: The attached background material reflects the original petition of the businesses. Because the issues involved real estate negotiations, much of the material provided to the City Council were matters for closed session. In summary, the City Council considered the petition and the interests of businesses and property owners in that area. The concept of restriping was not pursued, as more substantive changes were investigated. The City Council determined that three parcels near the public parking lot were no longer needed for public use, cancelled the lease with Vasek Polak on two of those lots, and subsequently sold them. Discussions with Mr. Polak on improving access on the current City -owned public lots, the one lot owned by Mr. Polak used for parking, and the one City lot leased to Mr. Polak; did not prove successful. Also, because the subject of access was a matter of litigation between two private parties, the City took no further action. City staff has continued to inquire if there is interest in the business community for developing a parking structure on these lots. The response has been mild interest but no requests for active participation. In 1988, he information obtained from the City's circulation element consultant, DKS, was reviewed to determine the need for improved ff-street parking along Pacific Coast Highway. The informati n from DKS at that time indicated that on -street parking s not fully being utilized. On the west side between First and Tenth Streets, the average daily utilization was 48%, and on the east side, the average daily utilization was 33%. While the information was flawed due to its limited scope, the 1988.memo reflects that the data sug- gests the parking lots are not as critical as originally per- ceived. However, the memo makes an important exception, "If on -street parking is removed during peak rush hour conditions as has been proposed in the past, obviously the need for park- ing lots will also change." evin B. Northcr (ft City Manager KBN/ld Attachments June 7, 1988 Honorable Mayor, City Council and City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: Parking Lot on 200 Block of Pacific Coast Highway The following is a brief background on the parking situation in- volving City owned parking property on the 200 block of PCH, and several proposals on hoer the City can help alleviate the parking problem involving all the merchants on said block. Around August of 1984, the owners of 201 Pacific Coast Hwy. de- cided to erect a block wall directly behind their property, which eliminated the only egress and ingress from 2nd St. to 3rd St. This action, which was fought by 90% of the merchants from 2nd St. to 5th St., resulted in a confusing and limited parking situation. Adding to this problem, 3rd St. has become a vary confining and highly congested area. The consensus of the business people in this area, is that this situation has resulted in a decline of business and an increase in business turnover. Add to this, the high level of residential density, the demand for public parking has far exceeded the re- sources now offered. We have employed a State Licensed Parking Engineer to design and diagram several proposals which we believe could satisfy all parties concerned and help solve thepublic parking dilemma. PLAN "A" AND "B" The City will negotiate with Vasek Polak for the trading of Lot 89 for the City owned Lot 88. This would allow an egress and ingress from 3rd St. to 2nd Street. This would also make available access to the trafic light on 2nd Street and PCH, and direct access to the merchants westside entries. It would also provide 31 parking spaces. We are aware of the fact that Mr. Polak is trying to pur- chase. Lot 88 for private use. To help appease this situation, as part of, the above trade, the city could sell Lot 65 to Mr. Polak and that would give him the exact amount of parking facility as the City Parking Lots would contain. Page Two Parking Lot of 200 Block of PCH June 7, 1988 PLAN "C" In the event Plan A & B could not be negoiated, the City could cancel the lease on Lot 88 and give it back for public use. The diagram for Plan "C" shows parking for 47 cars, plus the egress and ingress made available. In closing, we once again ask the city for their help in resolv- ing this matter. We would all like to look forward to a pros- perous .future in our city, but this will only come about if we are all afforded the same opportunity, as equals. Sincer,ly signed by the Merchants in this area, ,oz( Pcje 74/exti ti 6 1L2 441a44,1 A/a,t,vied 6K -L 457L4_ X33 fd/e/- ,114 /1 !( 2-13 3 o 9 YAG tcY‘- A (c < < i4,13 (0 6 . ODA5-C LTG - 7 -033 -RCA 1- (De Cofr.i2 it) t ) TG - J7 ue. Z $' vPoti/ow, 4d FX% ! ,011"/ OJT"/ I 1 I - 1 Ipatio/it/ rar,ti�f I 1 i J .t L 1 L -1 En -ter QL\ ► r I ?unlit! poik.» ► ► fyii- 10' 1 Entry •— j parr�Hcl fark,ng F/oiv4r3_ •. earr:ollel earkidyi Enter` y. 'a$IIK 1 f irrullel P; rk►ily c ».i o e - orl 75. '," Ps.wer bed ' . 3 tt . ,,. • parrnllet&rk►.1•5 ‘1 I 1 t i —p 1 _ Ps3i�l� Fl•wer3 earralleilp4.Ik445 841 1 1 h par,ellel parkr,,9 ill! j 3' II�n�'er L I fel/rade ls° ki Sig 7 1 .� � i�� �/�'/-�Fi,�rrA�l-,L'/�%/fes/',j 7L �, •� /� CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager FROM: William Grove, Director of Building and Safety RE: City Owned Property -`.Southwest Quadrant DATE: June 27, 1988 I have reviewed the records provided by the City Clerk regarding the various properties discussed in closed session on June 14, 1988 and offer the following information: Parcel 1 This parcel was a tax delinquent property acquired from the State of California for the sum of $10.00 on October 26, 1967. The records indicate it was obtained for possible street purposes to connect First Street with Herondo Avenue. Due to recent development in Redondo Beach adjacent to this lot, it no longer appears to be a viable idea even if desired. The agreement to purchase the lot for public purposes may have an impact on the ability to sell the property for residential development. The City Attorney should be consulted regarding the limitations of the agreement. Parcel 2 This parcel was acquired from Robert and Anna Vargas for the sum of $22,000.00 on April 14, 1964. The City Council agenda item indicates that this property was also obtained for possible street purposes. If the property is not needed for street purposes, it would appear that the property could be sold for residential development without restriction since the property was purchased with general fund money. Parcel 3 This parcel was acquired from two separate parties, Thomas and Ruthe Schlosser and William and Minnie Howard in July of 1955. The total amount paid for the parcel was $22,000.00 and it appears that it was paid with general fund money. Resolutions N.S. 1856 and N.S. 1857 indicate that the property was obtained for off street parking purposes. The acquisition was apparently spurred by a petition containing 45 signatures which urged the city to obtain the parcels to "alleviate the hazardous and conjested parking conditions in the adjoining business district". Copies of the documents provided by the city clerk are available for your review if desired. CITY OWNED PROPERTY SOUTHWEST QUADRANT 1) Lot 149, Walter Ransom Co's Venable Place Tract (Formerly leased to AMC Jeep) Zone: R-2 General Plan: Medium Density Residential Lot Size: 4,568 sq. ft. 2) Lots 124 & 140, Walter Ransom Co's Venable Place Tract (Currently leased to Vasek Polak) Zone: R-2 General Plan: Medium Density Residential Lot Size: 2 @ 4600 sq. ft. each (9200 sq. ft. total) 3) Lots 64,65,88 and portions of lots 87,59 and 60 Walter Ransom Co's Venable Place Tract (City parking lot and,a portion leased to Vasek Polak) Zone: C-3 except for the portion of lot 87 which is R=3 General Plan: Multi -use Corridor Parcel Size: 16,592 sq. ft. (5750 sq. ft. leased to V. Polak) i4O ' 1ST x`/5025 //3742 I% .. I8 r4,-,41. 22,807_ ,, CB A2 ti 3/4=-SEaaeO ot. dO % : ?2,493 s or - I Pr. 'I o y0 / 1 C De{Or in. go Sau crura see .5 la 4(1 - .980/^ 6. Eose• 740 • HER0N0° ST. NORTH ANCISCA • PRFV. ASSM'T SEE: !-24826 L. Zg3.� ease. 3 40 3^' 40.38 _ S�aPe 1 ' /320ERpN00 r: �e 51% 2.2/ DETAIL NO SCALE 23 \5� 4,5.93", 40 m 22 4373 ' 40• 45 [/TY `A9 4,658^, 45,43 SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH WALTER RANSOM CO'S VENABLE PLACE N. 76' 46 47.64 \A'1 - 48.09 M. B. 3-11-12 M.B. 9-150 css \q6 60.51 60 \A5 4,920• 4to 60,57 N 40 gO 1 . `43 ••11 /23.85 �7d06: 7505 76.96 84070• ASSESSOR'S MAP COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIF. • 'PEV. ASSM'T SEE • . 24 d 27,E . SECOND ADDITION. TO ' HERMOSA -- - _. WALTER RANSOM CO'S VENABLE PLACE M B. 9 —150 TRACTNO. 5019 M.B. 54 — 6 ASSESSOR'S MAP:: ; - '• •F is COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. CALIF. ' 80/1/0221 810722403 83103/3 060602404-86 L 50 1 95 1 35_ 53.93 s 1 74 k a ' ,�Z `Z I 40 M •! • !• 0 ' 70 • O 69 1 SHEET .2 . ;... • .. O 67 •• 35 66 '" 65 '� CITY 7 . • �(1 64 ` /6,591" /10 . 58,749/3- fi 5S r P//O Z 43 1 7 115 �` a 4Z h 3,40 - 1 2,4401.,11fa0t.Q 50 1 35 (' 35 I— :_. w (.0 • I 40 ry i',. L 74 h O O `•._• 9 �' 74 m �7�3., s3 76 a5 m 4 eS40r,�. m N //9.48 ` � 72 ycr. 3; (ii•7J '. /� 3/ 60 . Pot. /00 36 • . • 36 1 2502 r 4O /r0 32 61 Pot �. 1 32.6/ S . S/ Cr) (‘.1: a. = 0 4 3 2 1 N I • N % �(4,J201•• 4,,320t.r 4;3201.r ;!,6602.1, ,. �. 1 86 • '• 36 ' 36.09 47. /3 20 82 Poc 20 83 w. 40 84 . 85 o 86 ' �� s 40 87 30 I 88 ... Di 4 89 •_ 40 - 33 62 • Pot.. • CI 63 0 r/O e4 . 4 5. PBEV: ASSMT. SEE: 4188-34 WALTER RANSOM CO'S VENABLE . PLACE M. B.9-150' • TRACT NO. 8.1 .• • M.B.13-2 CONDOMINIUM . . PARCEL. MA P P M Ian -aa- 1 90 LL I_ CONDOMINIUM CONDOMINIUM• PARCEL__MAP PARCEL MAP• PM.•133-30-31 PM. 146-70 .. CONDOMINIUM PARCEL MAP PM.TA -Fo ASSESSORTS •I•IAP COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIF.