Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/09/91• PREfl MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, April 09, 1991, at the hour of 7:171/ P.M. CLOSED SESSION - The closed session was held at 6:3 P.M. regard- ing matters of employee meet and confer; and, matters of litiga- tion: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Miller vs. City of Hermosa Beach and Leavitt vs. Hermosa Beach. The session was adjourned at 7: P.M. to the regular scheduled public. meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Essertier, Midstokke, Wiemans, Mayor Sheldon Absent: None PROCLAMATIONS California Beach Restaurant 10th Anniversary (and acknowledgment of $10,000 donation) Kazu Miyama, President of Mai Jasmine Corp. owner of California Beach Restaurant in Hermosa Beach which opened in April of 1981, on Sunday, April 14, 1991 will celebrate their tenth anniversary and to commemorate the occasion present the City with a check in the amount of $10,000 to be used by the Hermosa Beach Police Depart- ment to purchase protective body armor..... Community Helpline 20th Anniversary Glenn Villalobos/ made up of trained adult and teenage listeners, who on a volunteer basis, receive telephone calls from .people in need, and where appropriate and possible provide resources and referrals Earthquake Preparedness Month, April, 1991. INTRODUCTION OF NEW CANINES -)/;/// SHERLOCK ANDDINO . 6-11 City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7427 Id, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, „3 6 Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 832 Seventh Street, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, GSL CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7428 under Agenda Item 3.) Public comments on the Consent Calendar. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (1), with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: Midstokke, ( ) Esser - tier, and ( ) Midstokke. , Motion Creighton, second W etaTrs. So ordered. Coming forward to address the Council regarding items on the con- sent calendar was: e (a) (b) 4L,e_x Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on March 26, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the Meeting.. Action: To approve the minutes of March 26, 1991, as amended Motion , second . So ordered. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 36518, 36519, and Nos. 36521 through 36616 inclu- sive, noting voided warrants Nos. 36521, 36522, 26523, and 36524, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. Action: To approve the demands and warrants as presented. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7429 Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1991 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated April 1, 1991. Action: To receive and file the investment report for the month of March, 1991 as presented. Recommendation to receive and file status report on Greenbelt lawsuit. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 4, 1991. Action: To receive and file the status report on the Greenbelt Lawsuit which reported that the case is filed in Torrance Superior Court, and a trial date now has been established of November 3, 1991. The case could be decided within several weeks after that trial date, but, appeal by either party could extend the final resolution for up to an additional two years. Recommendation on memorandum from the Planning Commis- sion to City Council regarding water quality and conser- vation. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 12, 1991. Action: Planning 1) 2) To refer the matter to staff to update the Commission on the City's efforts in: what can the City do, or is doing to conserve water during the drought; gray water, e.g., water used for laundering clothes, should be studied for its potential to be reused for irrigation; and, is the City, or will the City help support the Heal the Bay. program? A program to restore the Santa Monica Bay. Recommendation from the Board of Parking Place Commis- sion to approve the extension of contract with Allright Parking, Inc. .Memorandum from.. General Services Director Cynthia Wilson dated April 2, 1991. This item was withdrawn prior to the meeting. City Council Minutes 04-09-91. Page 7430 • (h) (i) (j) (k) Recommendation to authorize call for bids - landscape maintenance contract. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated April 1, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to call for bids and issue addenda as necessary for the provision of landscape maintenance at 18 City parks and 31 City Medians by means of a proposed contract to run from July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1994 (renewable for three addi- tional years with consent of. Council and contractor). The cost of the current contract is $155,160 for fiscal year 1990/1991. Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign agreement with the West Basin Water District for free landscape drawings. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 28, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au- thorize the Mayor to sign the agreement with the West Basin Municipal Water District for their provision of a landscape architect to prepare conceptual drawings of drought tolerant landscaping for the Greenbelt at no cost to the City. Recommendation to approve inspection services for slurry seal project, CIP 89-170. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 2, 1991. Action: To approve the_ staff recommendation to: 1) authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Tierra Engineering Company for contract ad- ministration and inspection services; 2) authorize a not/to exceed amount for the proj- ect of $22,000 ($19,656 for inspection; $2,344 for contingency); and, 3) authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. Recommendation to approve extension of City Yard lease with Macpherson Oil Company. Memorandum from City Man- ager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 3, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au- thorize the Mayor to sign the extension of the lease of City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7431 the City yard with Macpherson Oil Company to extend the drilling term for three months, to July 15, 1991. Recommendation to direct staff to cause the owners of the private payphones on the public right-of-way to move those private payphones. Memorandum from General Ser- vices Director Cynthia Wilson dated April 2, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember for separate discussion later in the .meeting. Director Wilson and City Manager Northcraft responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter was; Action: To approve the staff, recommendations to: 1) relocate the private payphones from the Public Right of Way (P.R.O.W.) to an area totally upon private property or totally public property, where feasible; 2) negotiate with General Telephone (GTE) to con- tract for use of P.R.O.W., the City becoming the beneficiary of the commissions paid from the revenue received from the use of the pri- vate payphone; and, 3) remove those private payphones intruding upon the •P.R.O.W., deemed a nuisance or not provid- ing a public service. Motion , second . So ordered. eg .5 - :--s3 CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. J ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7432 Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Item ( ) was discussed at this time. At 8: P.M., item ( ) and item ( ) were suspended until after item 5, a public hearing. All items, however, are listed in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are listed under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS -TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL BY PLANNING COMMISSION AT 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HABASH AUTO DETAILING. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 1, 1991. Director Schubach presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. The public hearing Council were: was opened, coming forward to address the X03 .504 7. 6&�� The public hearing was closed. Action: To overturn the Planning Commission decision; deny the Conditional Use Permit on reconsideration; and, adopt Resolution No. 91-5445, entitled, HA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFOR- NIA, TO DENY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, ON RECONSIDERA- TION, FOR AN AUTO DETAILING SHOP IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7433 AUTO SALES ESTABLISHMENT FOR 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 1, AND LOTS 3, 5 AND.7, BLOCK B, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT." Motion , second . So ordered. Action: To uphold the Planning Commission decision; approve the Conditional Use Permit on reconsideration; and, adopt Resolution No. 91-5445, entitled, HA_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND AUTO DETAILING SHOP IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN AUTO SALES BUSINESS, AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LE- GALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF. LOT 1, AND LOTS 3, 5 AND 7, BLOCK B, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT." Motion ,.second . So ordered. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. RECOMMENDATION ON BILTMORE SITE ACTION PLAN FOLLOWING RECENT COASTAL COMMISSION ACTION. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director. Michael Schubach dated April 2, 1991. Director Schubach presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter were: mac- City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7434 7. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct staff to begin procedural steps to amend the general Plan and zoning to be consistent with the Coastal Com- mission's decision on the City -owned Biltmore Site and Lot C by: 1) amend the General Plan in annual 2nd quarter General Plan amendment to designate the Bilt- more Site for mixed commercial/residential use accordingly; 2nd quarter Land Use amendments are scheduled to commence on April 18th, and will be submitted to the City Council on June 25th for adoption; 2) amend zoning ordinance Specific Plan Area to be consistent with the General Plan and amended Certified Land Use Plan; and, 3) notify the Costal Commission of acceptance of their decision after public hearing. If the. decision to place on the ballot is made and the measure fails, then, the City will need to adopt a new amendment and propose it to the Coastal Commission. Motion , second . So ordered. RECOMMENDATION OF STRAND SAFETY SUB -COMMITTEE TO INSTALL BICYCLE DISMOUNT STRUCTURES. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated March 19, 1991. .Director Wisniewski - --=• - - AB --and re- sponded to Council questions. 0 ` Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au- thorize installation of dismount structures at 2nd City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7435 Street, 10th Street, 14th Street, 22nd Street, and 27th Street for a sixty (60) day trial period. j , second . So ordered. Prii"j7)20 ` 8. APPROVAL OF NEW CLASS SPECIFICATION FOR CABLE TELEVISION/PUBLIC INFORMATION COORDINATOR AND ESTABLISH- MENT OF A SALARY RANGE FOR THE POSITION. Memorandum from Personnel Director 'Robert Blackwood dated April 4, 1991. (Continued from 3/2'6/91 meeting.) Director Blackwood presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions 6/"7 A tion: To approve the staff recommendation to. 1) approve the proposed class specification for ---e___..---"Cable Television/Public Information Coordina- tor; and authorize the City Manager to sign a Supplemen- tal to the Administrative Bargaining Unit to establish a salary range for the position. Motion , Second . So ordered, noting the. objections of am) � � y- -->-- e„, City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7436 • 3 1 f t J 9. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT ON NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY AND DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR POSSIBLE CITY HALL EXPANSION. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated March 19', 1991. Director Antich presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. el Action: To receive and file the report as presented. Motion , second . So ordered. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Northcraft reported 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Consideration of a, date for a joint meeting with the Chamber of Commerce. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 3, 1991. Thursday, June or Jul ' /7//, City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7437 1991, at the hour of 7:30 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: d -5_. -c C:;)--,6)-"z2,v25 -e-r' 7 11 ,ry I c c may/ Recommended Action: 1) Vote by ounci] discuss this item; 71 refer to staff for a 1) Vote by ouncil whether discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for report IA �.�� on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by cil action toni ht // * �" -- CITIZEN A -9-- ,,r 04i?, -Citizens wishing to address the Council ( the Council's jurisdiction may do so Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming to back Coun- L on items wit T in at this time. forward to address the Council at this time were: Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, Wilma Burt 1152 Seventh Street, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton- 832 Seventh Street, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, ADJOURNMENT IN MEMORY OF PATRICK ROSSETTI, FORMER CITY ASSESSMENT ENGINEER AND COMMUNITY CENTER BENEFACTOR r ,-2-c(City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7438 ` / 1 �/ • The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, April 09, 1991, at the hour of 11: P.M., to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, April 23, 1991, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 04-09-91 Page 7439 r- 1 Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wesdnesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities: for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included_. in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If receivedafter packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. CITY VISION A less dense, more.family oriented pleasant low profile, financially sound community comprised of a separate and distinct business district and residential neighborhoods that are afforded full municipal services in which the maximum costs are borne by visitor/users; led by a City Council which accepts a stewardship role for community resources and displays a willingness to explore innovative alternatives, and moves toward public policy leadership in attitudes of full ethical awareness. This Council is dedicated to learning from the past, and preparing Hermosa Beach for tomorrow's challenges today. Adopted by City Council on October 23, 1986 City Offices -are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M. Mon. '-'Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers'.: (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an iters from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances .. An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. ' At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said :letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council.... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. 92-./ 57 "Laughter is a tranquilizer with no side effects." -Arnold H. Glasgow AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 9, 1991 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Charles W. Sheldon MAYOR PRO TEM Kathleen Midstokke COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Robert Essertier Albert Wiemans Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY- TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Public Library and the Office of the City Clerk.. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS: California Beach Restaurant 10th Anniversary (and acknowledgment of $10,000 donation) Community Helpline 20th Anniversary Earthquake Preparedness Month,. April, 1991. INTRODUCTION OF NEW CANINES - SHERLOCK AND DINO. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of. the City Council held on March 26, 1991. (b) Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the March, 1991 in- vestment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated April 1, 1991. (e) Recommendation to receive and file status report on Greenbelt lawsuit. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 4, 1991. (f) Recommendation on memorandum from the Planning Commis- sion to City Council regarding water quality and conser- vation. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 12, 1991. (g) Recommendation from the Bo •f Parking Place Commis- sion to approve the exteNi4n of contract with Allright Parking, Inc. Memora from General Services Director Cynthia Wilson dated 'it 2, 1991. (h) Recommendation to authorize call for bids - landscape maintenance contract. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated April 1, 1991. (i) Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to sign agreement) with the West Basin Water District for free landscape drawings. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 28, 1991. (j) Recommendation to approve inspection services' for slurry seal project, CIP 89-170. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated April 2, 1991. (k) Recommendation to approve\extension,of City Yard lease with Macpherson Oil Company. Memorandum from City Man- ager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 3, 1991'. - 2 - (1) 2. 3. Recommendation to direct staff to cause the owners of the private payphones on the public right-of-way to move those private payphones. Memorandum from General.Ser- vices Director Cynthia Wilson dated April 2, 1991. CONSENT ORDINANCES. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL BY PLANNING COMMISSION AT 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HABASH AUTO DETAILING. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 1, 1991. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. RECOMMENDATION ON BILTMORE SITE ACTION PLAN FOLLOWING RECENT COASTAL COMMISSION ACTION. Memorandum from Plan- ning Director Michael Schubach dated April 2, 1991. 7. RECOMMENDATION OF STRAND SAFETY SUB -COMMITTEE TO INSTALL BICYCLE DISMOUNT STRUCTURES. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated March 19, 1991. 8. APPROVAL OF NEW CLASS SPECIFICATION FOR CABLE TELEVISION/PUBLIC INFORMATION COORDINATOR AND ESTABLISH- MENT OF A SALARY RANGE FOR THE POSITION. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated (Continued from 3/26/91 meeting.) 9. RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT ON NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY AND DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR POSSIBLE CITY HALL EXPANSION. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Anthony Antich dated March 19, 1991. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS CITY COUNCIL (a) Consideration of a date for a joint meeting with the Chamber of Commerce. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated April 3, 1991. 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by. Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT IN MEMORY OF PATRICK ROSSETTI, FORMER CITY ASSESSMENT ENGINEER AND COMMUNITY CENTER BENEFACTOR. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, March 26, 1991, at the hour of 7:39 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mary Rooney, Director of Community Resources ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Essertier, Wiemans, Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke Absent: Mayor Sheldon RECOGNITION FOR CITY EMPLOYEE VOLUNTEERS INVOLVED IN HERMOSA "RELEAF" Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke expressed the City's grati- tude to the volunteer City staff members who donated their time and effort to the "Hermosa Beach Releaf" program to plant trees on the greenbelt, and presented Certificates of Appreciation to: Deb Brewster Michael Flaherty Ells Freeman Ken Lindsey Jim Sandus Barbara Conklin Sheldon Osekowsky CHEVRON REPORT ON OIL SPILL IN SANTA MONICA BAY.. R. K. Spackman, Public Affairs Manager for the ,dos An- geles Basin of Chevron U.S.A. Inc., reported on the oil spill caused when a tanker snagged a pipe line with its anchor. He said that environmental damage had been minimal and that Chevron was investigating the incident. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned with signs on City property in the walkway of Loreto Plaza; City Manager Northcraft was directed to respond to Ms. Cassell regarding this matter. Dennis Cobb - no address given, concerned with item 1(h); and, Diane Ludwig - 1900 Manhattan Avenue, announced an exchange program for students from France this summer and asked for volunteer host families. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (h), with the exception of the following items which were pulled for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (e) Essertier, (f) Esser - tier, and (h) Midstokke. Motion Creighton, second Wiemans. So ordered. City Council Minutes.03-26-91 Page 7418 ia Coming forward to address the Council regarding items on the con- sent calendar was: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned with item 1(b), regarding memberships in Ser- vice Clubs. City Manager Northcraft was directed to respond to Ms. Cassell regarding this matter. (a) (b) Recommendation toapprovethe following mi rites: 1) Special meeting of the City Council held on March 11, 1991; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on March 12, 1991. Action: To approve the minutes of March 11, 1991 and March 12, 1991 as presented.. Recommendation to approve Demands and Warrants Nos. 36216 and 36339 through 36517 inclusive, and to note void warrants Nos. 36348 through 36353 inclusive, Nos. 36393, 36418, 36419, and 36420. Action: To approve the demands and warrants. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) (e) Action: To receive and file the future agenda items. Recommendation to receive and file financial reports for month of February, 1991: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. Action: To receive and file the financial reports for the month of February, 1991. Recommendation to approve new class specification for Cable Television/Public Information Coordinator and to establish the salary range for the position. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated March 19, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Director Blackwood and City Manager Northcraft responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address. the Council on this matter was; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street. City Council Minutes 03-26-91 Page 7419 Proposed Action: To continue this matter to the annual budget review in August and have staff compile more in- formation on the amount and type of complaints, and the amount of hours and work involved in the position. Motion Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke, second Creighton. The motion was superseded by a substitute motion by a vote of: AYES: Creighton, Essertier,'Wiemans, Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke NOES: None Final Action: To continue this matter to the meeting of April 9, 1991, and to have staff address the concerns expressed in the proposed motion. Motion Creighton, second Wiemans. So ordered. (f) Recommendation to approve Southern California Over -the - line Professional Beach Softball Tournament. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 19, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Director Rooney responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter was: Russ Johnson - representing the Over -the -line Professional Beach Softball Tournament; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., opposed; and, Carl Taylor - Hermosa resident and participant in the family sport, in favor of the tournament. (g) (h) Action: To deny the request. Motion Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke, second. Essertier. So ordered. Recommendation to approve 30 -day extension of temporary appointment for two General Services Officers and one Technical Aide. Memorandum from Personnel Director Rob- ert Blackwood dated March 19, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to extend for thirty (30) days the six-month temporary appointment of two (2) General Services Officers and one (1) Techni- cal Aide. Recommendation to award contract for slurry seal, CIP 89-170. Memorandum from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March 20, 1991. Supplemental information from Public Works Director Anthony Antich dated March, 26, 1991. t$ City Council Minutes 03-26-91 Page 7420 This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke, at the request of staff, for sep- arate discussion later in the meeting. Director Antich presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter was. Dennis Copp - of Copp Contracting, who `protested that the second low bidder, Glick Corporation, was not qualified, due to having only a C-32 license, to perform the work as stated in the bid, and asked the Council to defer awarding the contract until a written opinion is received from the State Contrac- tors License Board. City Attorney Vose responded to Council questions and stated that he saw no legal requirement for the City to wait for a written opinion to award the contract. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) relive Excel Paving Company from its bid, based on the legal determination by the City Attor- ney's office; 2) return Excel Paving Company's bidder's bond (proposal guaranty); 3) award to the second lowest cost bidder, thereby authorizing the Mayor to sign a contract for Schedule "B: with Glick Corporation at a cost of $240,240; and, 4) authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary, not to exceed a total contract cost of $300,000. Motion Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 91-1053 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 27A "SANITATION, GARBAGE AND REFUSE" AS IT RELATES TO SALVAGING. For adoption. Action: To approve Ordinance No. 91-1052. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke. Councilmembers Creighton and Wiemans stated that they were casting Aye votes on this Ordinance, despite their personal objections and their No votes at its introduc- tion, due to the absence of Mayor Sheldon (who would have cast the third Aye vote necessary for adoption), to save the City the time and expense of re -introduction. So ordered. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. City Council Minutes 03-26-91 Page 7421 Item (e) was discussed at this time. At 8:18 P.M., item (f) and item (h) were suspended until after item 5, a public hearing. All items, however, are listed in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are listed under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PUBLIC. HEARINGS 5. APPEAL OF DENIAL BY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VARIANCE AT 1010 OWOSSO. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated March 18, 1991. Director Schubach responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened. No one came forward to address the Council on this matter. The public hearing was closed. Action: To deny the appeal; to sustain the Planning Commission decision to deny the requested variance; and, to adopt Resolution No. 91-5444, entitled, 'IA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CAL- IFORNIA, TO SUSTAIN THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR A TWELVE (12) FOOT GARAGE SETBACK RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED SEVENTEEN (17) FEET AND FOR A PARALLEL SPACE BEHIND THE GARAGE TO COUNT AS A REQUIRED GUEST PARKING SPACE AT 1010 OWOSSO AVENUE, LE- GALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 10, TRACT 5826.0 Motion Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the objection of.Wiemans. At this time, Council resumed consideration of items pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, but those items are listed in order for clarity. The meeting recessed at 8:37 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:49 P.M. After reconvening the meeting from recess, Mayor Pro Tempore Mid- stokke stated that the applicant for item 5 had approached her during this recess and stated that due to a family problem he had not been able to appear earlier, and now wished to speak before the Council. City Attorney Vose was asked what the legal requirements were for reconsideration and if the appellant could legally address the Council at this time. City Attorney Vose responded that the hearing would have to be rescheduled and re -advertised, with the appellant again paying the costs, but that Council could allow the appellant to speak briefly now, in order to determine if City Council Minutes 03-26-91 Page 7422 there might be any substantial new facts that had not been in- cluded in the staff report that could change the decision and justify rehearing the matter. The Council declined to hear the applicant and suggested that the appellant submit any findings to justify the variance to staff for review. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. HISTORICAL SOCIETY RELOCATION ALTERNATIVES. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooneydated March 15, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign a lease agreement with the Hermosa Beach Historical Society for the use of the west locker room at the Community Center for a period of five years. And to: 1) direct staff to arrange for the removal of City records from the locker rooms (relocate to Prospect School House or east locker room); 2) direct staff to inspect the west locker room for safe occupancy by the Historical Society; 3) extend the current lease agreement with the Historical Society for the use of Room 7 in the Community Center on a month to month basis un- til the City is able to arrange for the safe and secure relocation of City records, and ex- tend the Room 7 lease for up to 60 days follow- ing the availability of the west locker room to the Historical Society (to accommodate move -in preparations); 4) exclude the recreation equipment storage room from the lease. Pending the City's eventual ability to vacate the recreation equipment storage room (located in the west locker room), discontinue lease agreement with the Historical Society for the use of Room 6D in the Community Center; 5) the lease rate shall be set at $1 per year; 6) the lease shall include a 60 day out clause whereby either party can terminate' the lease with 60 days written notice; and, 7) allother lease terms as required by City policy. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke. So ordered. 7. UTILIZATION OF PROSPECT SCHOOL HOUSE. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated March 15, 1991. Action: To approve the recommendation of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Commission and staff to approve the use of Prospect School as" a storage City Council Minutes 03-26-91 Page 7423 facility for items currently held at the Community Cen- ter and that it be restored and maintained as a two room school house in line with its historical significance. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered. 8. STATUS OF COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SOUTH BAY CYCLES. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated -`March 19, 1991,;.;,- Director 991 ;Director Schubach presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter was: Maiko Saravia - appellant, 640 Pacific Coast Hwy., stated that of the items listed in the letter of March 11, 1991, only the noise study and the traffic study remained to be completed. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct staff to enforce all conditions of the Conditional Use Permit, including immediate correction of the items not- ed in the Planning Department letter to William Campbell dated March 11, 1991, and to direct staff to begin cita- tion and revocation hearings if the applicant fails to comply within the next 60 days. Also, for staff and the applicant to reach an agreement on what the traffic study should entail within 60 days. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered. 9. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE BROKER. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dat- ed March 17, 1991. Director Blackwood presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation Nos. 1 and 2, but to delete No. 3 which called for the appointment of a Council Sub -Committee: 1) approve the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Health Insurance Brokerage Services; and, 2) authorize staff to advertise for, and solicit, proposals for Health Insurance Brokerage Services. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke. So ordered. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Northcraft reported: 1) the City now owns the five lots adjacent to the Edith Rodaway Park and will• work to enlarge the park to provide more open space to the City; 2) that confirmation had beenreceived that two new restaurants would be locating in Hermosa: City Council Minutes 03-26-91 Page 7424 Picasso's at the Pavillion and one (unnamed at this time) at the site of the Bob's Big Boy; 3) a reminder of the P.T.O. breakfast and tour at Valley School on Thursday, March 28, 1991, starting at 7:30 A.M.; and, 4) the Community Resource's annual Easter Egg Hunt at Valley Park an Saturday, March 30, 1991, starting about 1:00 P.M. Councilmember Creighton asked City Manager Northcraft to report, at the next meeting, on the status of the law- suit on the remaining part of the railroad right:: of way. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Recommendation of Council Sub -Committee for zoning - related standards/Staff recommendation for further study. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated March 20, 1991. City Manager Northcraft responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter were: Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, suggesting that Council also consider a ballot measure regard- ing the amount of parking required in commer- cial and multi -family zones;. Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, concerned about the phrase, "including but not limited to"; and, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned about "downzoning". Action: To approve the text of the four mandatory measures regarding building height, and to direct staff to prepare appropriate wording for each in order to meet the legal requirements for ballot measures. Motion Creighton, second Wiemans. So ordered, noting the objection of Essertier. Proposed Action: to the meeting of full Council. Motion Creighton. second. To continue the two advisory measures April 9, 1991, when there would be a The motion died due to the lack of a Further Action: To approve in concept the two advisory measures, changing the wording in the first advisory measure to include, "Should the City of Hermosa Beach. pursue a Housing Improvement Program comprised of citizens for the purpose of establishing restrictive housing standards.....", and direct staff to prepare appropriate wordingand return the measures to Council in the correct legal form for the November ballot. Motion Wiemans, second Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke. So ordered. City Council Minutes 03-26-91 Page 7425 (b) Vacancy — Housing Advisory and Appeals Board. Memoran- dum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated March 20, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) accept with regret the resignation of Charlie Swartz• and, 2) direct, that the City Clerk advertise and request applications from interested persons, that a notice be posted at the Building, Plan- ning and Public Works counters, and that the staff liaison to the Board solicit potential candidates from the current Board members. Also, to direct staff to prepare a plaque of apprecia- tion for Charlie Swartz. Motion Mayor Pro Tempore Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Wiemans stated that the Chief of Police is doing what the Council requested him to do and has his support. Councilmember Creighton asked City, Manager Northcraft to research if the Sheriff's study is broken down by man- power first, with the costs to be supplied later. Also he requested to know how the study was proceeding and when the Council might expect to see some of the study. Councilmember Essertier asked if the Sheriff's Depart- ment might supply a sample report that had been done for some other city. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, March, 26, 1991, at the hour of 9:56 P.M., to a Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, April 09, 1991, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. eputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 03-26-91 Page 7426 3 F INANCE—SEA340 TIME 16: 09: 16 — . •," CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH _ , DEMAND LIST , FOR 04/09/9i PAY VENDOR—NAME - VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN—# AMOUN DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NV --/RE ,PAOE 0001 N • • DATE 04/03/91 2 ' 3 1K 4 AMOUNT UNENC ' DATE EXP 5 6 %. 7 H PARKER*HERR I OTT REFUND INIT. FILING FEE 02754 - 001-210-0000-2110 , 04179 $2O000 09361 36519 03/18/91 - /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0. 00 04/03/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************************************#4**** 12 $200. 00 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENTSY .,q.:00026001".40044213-418.600482$87,635.71 . RETIREMENT,-: FEBRUARY .02/28/91RETIREMENT▪ RETIREMENT: 36518 $0.00 — 04/03/91' 17 18 19 20 '5 17 18 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 RETIREMENT,' FEBRUARY 02/28/91 001-400-1213-4180 00483 $17, 136. 31CR RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT 36518 $0. 00 04/03/91 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS 00026 RETIREMENT,- FEBRUARY ,- 02/28/91 001-400-1213-4180 '*00.484, — 804' 00CR RETIREMENT5/RETIREMENT ' 36518 04/03/91 • 25 26 27 28 22 23 24 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00147 $717.75 RETIREMENT, FEBRUARY 02/28/91 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT 36518 .$0. 00 04/03/91 29 30 31 32 25 20 27 PUB EMPLOYEES RET I R 00015 $144 85 RETIREMENT,:: FEBRUARY :•• 02/28/91VEH • PKG DIST /RETIREMENT • r• : - 36518 $0. 00 04/03/91 33 34 35 36 29 23 30 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT, FEBRUARY 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00148 , $4, 532. 21 02/28/91 PARKING ENF /RETIREMENT $0. 00 36518 04/03/91 37 38 39 40 31 32 33 PUB EMPLOyEESRET/REMENT RETIREMENTFEBRUARY, 02/28/91 DIAL A R 36518 $0. 00 . 04/03/91 • •. . 41 42 43 44 34 35 30 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. ' RETIREMENT, FEBRUARY 00026 02/28/91 145-400-3402-4180 00121 ESEA $19. 74 /RETIREMENT 36518 $0.00 04/03/91 45 46 47 48 37 38 79 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT RETIREMENT,,FEBRUARY 00026 •':02/28/91 145-400-3403-4180 00048 $17 16 • BUS .:•PASS SUBPDY,./kET . $000 04/03/91 49 so 51 52 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 .H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT, FEBRUARY 00026 02/28/91 155-400-2102-4180 00119 $120.52 CROSSING GUARD /RETIREMENT $0. 00 36518 04/03/91 53 54 55 56 . . PUI3 EMPLOYEES RETIREP1ENT SYS 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00146 $96 EMENT —FEI3RUARY 02/28/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /R▪ ETIRE(IENT 36518 $0, 00 .04/03/91:' • 57 ss 59 60 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. R ET IR EMENT, FEBRUARY 00026 170-400-2103-4180 00020 $4, 172. 02 02/28/91 SPEC I NVESTGTNS /RETIREMENT $0. 00 36518 04/03/91 61 62 63 64 49 50 51 52 63 54 55 5G — , PUB: EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT:SYS • • RET I R 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00070 $240 19 11_, I TY INS V:::,./RETIREMENTvi] • • • • • •••. „ _ . 36518 $0. 00 04/03/91 - • • 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 7y •10. Sob yt, 4112. • fE. to. 2ti /1 6 7 9 F I-NANCE -SF-A340 TIME 16:09:16 CITY OF: HERMOSA BEACH r -77, -,77777 --DEMAND FOR 04/09/91 VND 4t AG@OUNT NUMBER TRN-11 AMOUNT - -VENDOR-NAME DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0502 DATE 04/03/91 2 • 3 y NV/REF- FO fl- CHK 4 AMOUNT UNENC, DATE EXP 4 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT,SYS.• s RETIREMENT, FEBRUARY 00026 02/28/91• 705-400-1217-4180 00070 $307.84 WORKERS COMP /RETIREMENT 36518' $0.00 04/03/91 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 11 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $8. 995. 96 13 14 15 16 3 f4 15 1G 17 18 *** PAY CODE TOTAL ************************************ **********************4****** $9. 195:-96 17 18 19 20 R A-1 COAST RENTALS CHARGES MARCH 13585 00029 001-400-4202-4201 00302 03/08/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT , $118.53 613585 00031 36525 $0.00 04/03/91 21 22 23 24 10 21 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***#*-*********** 25 26 27 28 22 23 24 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO MAINT/ADAPTER 27376 00935 02/25/91 001-400-2101-4307 00274 $85.78 POLICE /RADIO MAINTENANCE 27376 01704 36526 $100.00 04/03/91 29 30 31 32 25 26 27 ADVANCED ELECTRONICS< REPAIR RADIO/POLICE 21502' 001-400-2101-4307:- POLICE 00275 $269. 89 /RAD IQ_ MAINTENANCE', 21502 0170536526 $270.31. 04/03/91 33 34 35 36 29 29 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL************-******************************************************* $355. 67 37 38 39 40 31 32 33 34 35 36 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, MEMBERSHIP,:ROBERTSON 53554`;'. 00854 02/01/91 001..-400741017-4315.:.-,i. 00153 PLANNING $142. 00 /MEMBERSHIP.` 53554 01903 36527 $0.00 04/03/91 41 42 43 44 *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************#************************************************** $142. 00 45 46 47 48 37 38 33 AMERICAN STYLE FOODS. MISC`CHARGES MARCH 75878 00857.. ,• 03/26/91 001.-400-2.101-4306 POLICE". $60,00 5824/5878 /PRISONER'MAINTENANCE 00035 $0;00 36528 04/03/91''' 49 So 51 52 40 41 42 *** VENDOR TOTAL***********#******************************************************** $60. 00 53 54 55 56 43 44 45 APWA SEMINAR, ANTICH/TERRY:;. 03953 ,Q3i20/711. ` 1.400-4202-4316 00184 PUB x WKS ' ADMIN: 100..00 /TRAINING <02043 36529- T:$9:00 ,' 04/03/91',- 57 59 60 46 47 48 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100. 00 61 62 63 64 49 50 51 AT & T.' MOBILEL•ONG,DIST MARCH 03423 °I '03/08/9 1,=-400=2101-4304' POLICE" 23:6 /TELEPHONE 00036 36530 $0. 00 , -' 04/03/91 65 66 67 68 52 53 54 69 70 71 72 55 it, 56 0 41. 73 74 75 r/ 79, dor JO' r r 4—_____F=NANQF-5FA3-40 TIME 16:09:16 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 f5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND -618T FOR "04/09/91: PAGE --0003 DATE 04/03/91 RAY VENDOR_lAMESND # ACCOUNT—NUMBER TRN !t DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL et**#*3tat3t***#, ##*########*!###*a� # #####*##*##*# #########*###**#-tt R BALL INDUSTRIES 00232 001-400-4204-4309 01954 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 83928 03/19/91 BLDG MAINT *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************###*#************# 44*** R BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. BUSINESS CARDS/FEHSKENS 1846 BERIAN PRINTING' SERVICE, COPIES/HOUSING ELEMENT' R BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. BUSINESS CARDS/C. SWARTZ 1845 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***!******##14*44#3s-##4# R BLICKMAN, INC. THEATRE TECHNICIAN INV.ARCf f'O 44 CHF; -14 ' AMOUNT UNENC. DATE EXP $976. 96 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 02664 001-400-1207-4305 00233 03/18/91 BUS LICENSE 02664 001-400-4101-4305• 00516;: 12/10/90 PLANNING :: 02664 001-400-4201-4305 00646 03/18/91 BUILDING • $976.96''' $42. 60 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ,$245.10 /OFFICE, OPER -SUPPLIES 583928 02024 36531 $976.96 -^04/03/91 $42.60 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1846 11065 36532 $42.60 04/03/91 1247 10884 36532 $147.74 04/03/91:; 1845 00680 36532 $42.60 04/03/91 :$330..30 03092 001-400-4601-4201 00781 $147.00 03/12/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR,TOTAL,*****************###*##***********#**#**44*4**###-a-##*4:1 4 * 44f4**** R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES REFUSE LIENS 5/90-2/91 02076 001-300-0000-3859 03/28/91 01841 $0.00 36533 04/03/91 00054 $1,799.63 /REFUSE LIEN FEE *** . VENDOR: TOTAL ****4* **************************•**********##*##; *******44444*4**4, R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY ACCOUNTS PAYABLE WARRANT 73678 BUSINESS SYSTEMS, "SUPPLY =' RECEIPT 1300K5 759:' 01159 $0.00 36534 04/03/91 00034 001-400-1202-4305 00377 $782.19 03/19/91 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00034 03/21/91 4:7,400-120B —4305 00887 =` x$990.82 GEN;-APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES; *** VENDOR TOTAL#***#**#*#***##*******et#*at******#at•*#**#*##*#*#*#et****#stat#********#** LAURIE*BYREN• REFUND:ENROLLMENT FEE O1,`-300-0000-382 $1,773.01 173678 01134 36535 . $712.38 04/03/91 $20.00 /REC:PROGRAMS/CLASSES 01143 i36535 04/03/91 -: 01829 36536 $0:.00::' `:04/031911' 2 3 5 6 7 .. 0 9 to I1 12 1I 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 J i FI—MANCE—SF—A34-0 TIME 16:09:16 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LI"T OR, 04/09/9.1; F AGE DATE 04/03 ---.PAY VENDOR --NAME VND !t A&� - UNT N�IMBER— RN -44 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 5 DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION /91- 2 3 INVIREf f'O # —CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 IC 11 12 ### VENDOR TOTAL********************############******######************************-::. R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC. CONTRACT FEBRUARY 70102 00599 03/12/91 001-400-3101-4201 MEDIANS $20. 00 00069 '$3,202.59 76102/470102 00044 36537 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 04/03/91 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .3 14 15 R CA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, CONTRACT FEBRUARY 70102 . 00599 -r' .001-400-6101-4201 03/12/91 PARKS 00225 $10, 544. 15': . `-76102/470102 00044 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 36537 04/03/91 17 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 35 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ##* VENDOR TOTAL############******############***********************######********* R-. CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT.FOUND."r MEALS, ENDOM, JAIL MGMT 00073 ` 03/21/91 001-400.=2101-4313 POLICE 00334. $13,746.74 /TRAVEL'EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************* *******8***.t####*************************: ****## CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT FOUND JAIL MGMT,. KEARIN` 00677 03/21/91 001-400.-2101-4313 POLICE:: $53. 40 $209. 73 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL **************.**************************************************** CENT INELA SO.' BAY' V ISA ANNUAL FEE._VISA CARD.";3 03353 001-400--2101-4315 POLICE 03/13/91 ### VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************** CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT MISC CHARGES, MARCH 3677:. R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT MISC CHARGES MARCH 3677 R COM SYSTEMS; INC LONG DISTANCE PD LINE *** VENDOR .TOTAL: ******** *##* ** *##** ** R CONTINENTAL TOOL & HOIST GLOVES/SHOVELS 19848 00389... 03/07/9 $209. 73 $8, 00 /MEMBERSHIP`" #*###**##*#####**#*#### .tat 001-400-2101-4305;: .POLICE 00389 001-400-2201-4305 03/07/91 FIRE 00017 03/19/91 014482 $8. 00 /OFF.ICE`;'OPER'SUPPLIES:`. 00449 $26. 57 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $53 14 "' 01271 36538 $0.00 04/03/91 01270 36539 $0:00 . 04/03/91 01783' 36540 $0.00 04/03/91 00311 36541 $0.00 : ; 04/03/91 3677 00311 36541 $0.00 04/03/91 001-400-2101-4304 00777 $4.57 POLICE /TELEPHONE if14.41.*****#8631.41.######## *41-**#5t######1131.*##41.#4t+ 00317 $0. 00 36542 04/03/91 03878 001-400-3103-4309 01137 $129.42 02/27/91 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 919848 01496 $122. 72 36543 04/03/91 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 35 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 SS 56 73 74 75 79 Eib 6, EZNANCE=SRA340 , . • TIME 16: 09: 16 . RAY VENDOR -NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EMAND 091TOR 71 • VNO -4 # • • AMGUNT NW -RE DATE I NVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 3 AGC 000G DATE 04/03/91 2 1) 4 PO # CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • • R CONTINENTAL TOOL & HOIST • ••'- 03878 ; 001-400-6101-4309 ' 01038 • $129., 43 GLOVES/SHOVELS 19848 02/27/91 ' PARKS • ." /MAINTENANCE. MATERIALS 919848 01496 36543 $122.72 04/03/91 '411 12 13 11. 14 15 'E 10 :0 ,3 20 21 22 23 24 PS .35 27 20 29 30 31 32 33 3-1 35 35 37 30 39 40 41 42 43 44 40 AG 47 48 45 50 51 :3 54 55 R CONTINENTAL TOOL & HOIST GLOVES/SHOVELS 19848 03878 02/27/91 100-400-2601-4309 00705 $129.43 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS • , • • • • • • R CONTINENTAL TOOL & HOIST ' ' 03878 . `.,"'"-;,160-400-3102-4309 00588 ' $129.43 • • • GLOVES/SHOVELS • • 19848 • 02/27/91 - SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 919848 01496 36543 $122.72 1414 /03/91 919848 01496 36543 $122.72 04/03/91'. *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** . , . R . ' ROBERT S. *CUSTER REFUND ENROLLMENT FEE ' ; 14644 . • $517. 71 • 001-300-0000-3826 02166 , 146444 C0)c/152; /911. :. ' '.::'/REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $25.00 0 1 8 47 36544 $0. 00 04/03/91 - - ... • • - • " • DANIEL FREEMAN LAX "„IIED CL I N I C...'...''..i'...'W-02390::".3.001.4.-400-.12034320 003b8 $129.. 00"---H"'- 9748730 PHYSICAL, ADAMS '-':PERSONNEL VOY /PRE-EMPLOYMENT:J EXAMS • • 01350 - 36545 $0.00 04/03/91 444 VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R DAPPER TIRE • • RIO(JS $129. 00 8249 72 VARIOUS 00320 • 36546 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0 00 04/03/91 •'!: R DAPPER TIRE CO. CHARGES MARCH 01390 001-400-3103-4311 00654 RIOUS ' 03/21/91 ST MAINTENANCE $376. 74 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 4** VENDOR TOTAL 8626 $626.. 46 R DATA SAFE STORAGE/DEL MARCH' 54578 VAR I OUS 00320' 36546 $0.00 04/03/91 00156 001-400-1206-4201 00831 $158.67 54578 03/22/91 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT i1**,VENDOR:TOTAL:444444*4444**444********44444****44******444*************44444-44 $158 R DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE VICE OPS COURSE, WRIGHT 03954 001-400-2101-4316 03/21/91 POLICE 00723 $357.00 /TRAINING *44 , VENDOR' TOTAL.444444444.444-444*.444444444444444444444444444-44***44444444444**4444.444;,:zN R DFM ASSOCIATES 00726 001-400-1122-4305 00118 $56.50 ELECTION CODE COPIES 421IN 03/24/91 ELECTIONS /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00015 $0. 00 36547 04/03/91. 01269 3654e $0.00 04/03/91 94211N 09365 36549 $56.50 04/03/91 • • 4 .4 xi '11 • 1 1".4 ":.• . 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 145 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 40 47 40 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 GO 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 3) 774 5 j 29, _2) • • . F-INANCE=SF 431 TIME 16:09:16 CITY OF.HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND=L rT FOR:. 04/09/9.1 __PAY- --VENDOR-NAME VND-# AGGOUNT-NUMBER TRN !t AMOUNT' INWREF— P0-* CHK-# PAGE 000 DATE 04/03/91 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 3 .i 4 5 6 8 *** VENDOR TOTAL•********•********************************************************** 11 12 EASTMAN, INC. SUPPLIES, MARCH RIOUS $56': 50 .` 02514 001-400-1208-4305 00886 ; $441.93 03/20/91 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES VARIOUS 00325 36550 $0. 00 04/03/91 S. 1 i-} X11 13 14 R EASTMAN, INC.: BULLETIN BOARD/G. 1.10-400-3302-4305,00788 PARKING.ENF 98958 $2137 0Q, /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 7298958. 01601' 36550 $213.50 04/03/91 1C 17 10 13 23 21 *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************-******************************** $654.93 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 R EVENT' MEDICAL SERVICES RESUSCITATOR/FIRE RESCUE 8801 03408 001400.-2201-5401 .,00041 03/14/91 8801 11262 < ., 36551 $488. 84 04/03/91 25 26 27 28 *** VENDOR TOTAL*.*********4****-**************************************************** 23 24 $488. 84 29 30 11 5 27 :JOSEPH*GAINES R.EIMB EXPENSES, 02720 02/18/91.. .0011-7400=2101-4316 210005'POLICE C. • $93::93 /TRAINING 36552' 04/03/91 31 32 33 34 35 36 29 29 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $93. 93 37 38 39 40 31 32 33 34 35 35 GBH DISTRIBUTING DISPATCH HEADSET' REPAIR 02875 • 01/30/,91 1=400-2101.-4307': POLICE,` /RADIO $79:00 MAINTENANCE 9474 01720 '; '' 36553 $111.50-' >04/03/91: 41 42 43 44 *** VENDOR TOTAL*##*#***##****#**#**###*###*##*#####*##*#**#***#***#*****4*****####* $79. 00 45 46 47 48 37 38 39 GTE CALIFORNIA: FAX. MARCH 01=4001121-4304. :00379, CITY'CLEK %TELEPHONE? 00333 r, 36554 $0. 00 `;,, 04/03/91 49 so 51 52 53 54 55 40 41 42 R GTE CALIFORNIA, FAX MARCH INCORPORATED 00015 03/19/91 001-400-1201-4304 00429 CITY MANAGER $0. 64 /TELEPHONE 00033 36554 $0.00 04/03/91 56 43 44 45 46 47 40 GTE'. CALIFORNIA,. FAX MARCH INCORPORATED. 00015, 03/19/91 001'!..400-.71.2024304'...00441 FINANCE.ADMIN $2- 's/TELEPHONE ' 00333 `:36554 $0. 00 04/03/91 57 58 59 6o R GTE CALIFORNIA, FAX MARCH INCORPORATED 00015 03/19/91 001-400-1203-4304 00445 PERSONNEL $4.16 /TELEPHONE 00333 36854 $0.00 04/03/91 61 62 63 64 43 50 51 GTE CALIFORNIA, FAX MARCH CORPORATED 00015 a'., 03/19/91 1-400-1206-4304', 00327 -;DATA'PROCESSING • %TELEPHONE 36554 04/03/91: 65 66 67 68 52 53 54 69 70 71 72 55 50 57 d 73 74 75 d 7S ses I— SJ, I: 4 6 F.INANCE=SFA340. TIME 16:09:16 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST :FOR. 04/09/91. PAY VENDOR NAME VND AG OUN•I—NUMBCR TRN—# DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AMOU' iVV7'RE PAOE 0007 DATE 04/03/91 flfl—#—CNK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 6 8 9 R GTE CALIFORNIA, ` INCORPORATED , 00015 001,-400-1207.4304 Y. 00263 03/19/91 `BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE FAX MARCH 00333 36554 $0.00 04/03/91 9 10 11 12 10 11 2 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX MARCH 00015 03/19/91 001-400-2101-4304 00780 $0.85 POLICE /TELEPHONE 00333 36554 $0.00 "'04/03/91 13 14 is 16 14 15 R GTE CALIFORNIA, `INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4101-4304 '00444'`` $2 40> FAX MARCH • 03/19/91 PLANNING','` ./TELEPHONE:.` 00333 36554 $0.00 04/03/91 17 18 19 20 17 18 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX MARCH 00015 001-400-4201-4304 00408 03/19/91 BUILDING $0. 38 /TELEPHONE 00333 36554 $0.00 04/03/91 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 GTE CALIFORNIA, :INCORPORATED FAX MARCH 00015 03/19/91' 001400-4202-4304 00456.• X35 65. PUB WKS 'ADMIN /TELEPHONE',.:: :00333'; 36554 $0. 00 . 04/03/91 25 26 27 28 22 23 24 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED FAX MARCH 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00524 $1.30 03/19/91 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00333 36554 $0.00 04/03/91 29 30 31 32 25 25 27 R.. ,..GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED:. FAX MARCH. . 000.15 03/•19/91" 0-400-3302-4304 ,00441 PARKING: ENF ../TELEPHONE:'• 00333 ,36554 $0.00 "`'04/03/91 33 34 35 36 28 29 30 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****#*•n••u..x•ec••u********************•tt*************** ***•tt*************** $52. 45 37 36 39 40 31 32 33 .GTEL EQUIP RENTAL MARCH 01340 03/22/.91; d1 40&.!2101=430 $51. TELEPHONE:' 00334:: $0. 00 04/03/91:; 41 42 43 44 34 35 36 R GTEL LINE FOR FIRE ALARM 01340 305-400-8615-4304 00001 $202.18 03/25/91 CIP 89-615 /TELEPHONE 01637 $0. 00 36555 04/03/91 45 46 47 48 37 38 39 VENDOR TOTAL , *******•***********•***** ********4*************#•********** 50 51 52 40 41 42 43 44 R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. ELGIN SWEEPER PARTS 733 00731 03/28/91 001-400-3103-4311 00653 $1,383.33 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 733 02047 36556 $1,382.80 04/03/91 53 54 55 56 45 **:VENDORTOTAL' ***** **************** *****#** ii'3F:iF')%•3f * #**44**:*rias•*#44#*44*4#. 57 58 59 60 46 HIGH STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE A7 SIREN/PUB ADDRESS SYSTEM 5639 48 03536 03/20/91 001-400=2101-4311 01119 POLICE $1,137.39 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 5639 01756 36557 62 $1,134.22 04/03/91 63 64 49 50 51 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******4ae************1 # #tt at at if ***•******** ****444*************** •' 65 66 67 68 52 53 54 R HOZIES RADIATOR SERVICE RADIATOR RECORE/HB-5' 89929 00277 001-400-2101-4311 03/08/91 POLICE 01120 $127. 00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 89929 01762 36558 $127.00 04/03/91 69 70 71 72 fJ 8W !7 42, 0 it F-INANCE— SFA340 TIFIE 16:09:16 ' -----A-AY--.VENDOR--NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR' 04/09/91? PAGE 0008—; DATE 04/03/91 2 3 -• AGGOND tt ' ... �. ,..T ...... —R __.. DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP iJ 11 12 13 14 15 • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $127.;:00 02458 001-400-3104-4309 00660 : $283.97 CHARGES MARCH RIOUS 03/08/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 061-400-6101-4309°01037^ CHARGES -MARCH RIOUS „03/08/91 PARKS F":5391v 92 : ' /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS VARIOUS 00374 $0. 00 36559 04/03/91 00374 36559 $0.00 04/03/91 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 *## VENDOR TOTAL •tt********************•*****••tt**************************************** ROBIN A. *IZEMAN REFUND, INVALID CITES 68541'< •:03960 03/21/91 $675.89 110-300-0000-3302 '39345. :$40.00 968513/968541 01641 36560 ICOURTFINES/PARKING $0.00 04/03/91 *1* VENDOR TOTAL**********••tt*************•tt••tt••tt*******••tt••tt-•tt****••tt•**•tt•-tt•#•tt******•u************ 29 29 :10 31 32 33 TEREA#JOHNSON MEALS/LODGING-PRINT',CLSS . 00444 03/18/91 001.-400=2101-4312 POLICE $40. 00 $315. 06 %TRAVEL: EXPENSE i *** VENDOR TOTAL x•*******•**•n••tt*************:f******************* ********************** KAPAK; INC. POUCHES/NARCOTICS' 5423843 02092 001=400-2101-4305;; 03/11/91 POLICE; $315. 00 :01265 36561 $0,00'• 04/03/91 $255. 90 54238 01759 V36662 /OF.FICE OPER'SUPPLIES ''.'$258.00-. •04/03/91 6 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 44 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 S4 *** VENDOR TOTAL *******•**********************************•tt••tt-************************ RICHARD*KOZEL:.-'• REFUND TRAP DEPOSIT. 017-210-0000-2110 $255. 90 $50.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK. GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL ***•tt****•tt****••tt•*•tt* ***•tt*****••tt**••*•**********•************************** LIEBERT, CASSIDY &.FRIERSON CONSORTIUM MEMBERSHIP .. 02175' ;03/18/91., 017460-1203-4316,.;0019 .• PERSONNEL. $50. 00 '51580: 00 /TRAINING.'`;: *** VENDOR TOTAL***•***•************************************•****•*****•***************** DENNIS*LINDSEY: SLO-PITCH.LEAGUE CONTRGT: 13557;. $1, 590. 00 0-4601-4201 007823, 523: 20 >.`GOMM RESOURCES ?•/•CONTRACT. SERVICE/PRIVAT• 01577 ' 36563 $0.00 `..04/03/91 01347 36564. $0. 00 04/03/91 01842 ,36565'— $0.00 3656550.00 : 04/03/41 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 GO 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 0e, 56 4111. 44. o 73 7754 la 7N T N&NCE=SFA3407 TIME 16: 09: 16 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH __FAY VENDOR -NAME VND it AUNT-NWMRSR TRN It AMOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV -/RE GE ---000 DATE 04/03/91 P0 -4P AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 2 si& 4 5 6 7 8 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************,—$3,523,20 , • • • • .., - ...-. ....,..•,-,„•,... . . .• . . . , . . . . . . . . .. , . . . . . ... .. 190 11 12 R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 001-400-4202-4305 00557 $103.54 VARIOUS 00239 36566 CHARGES FEBRUARY RIOUS 02/25/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 lib.4/03/91 R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE. INC. - '7. 00077 ' 305-400-8170-4201 00003 : : $199.47 VARIOUS 00239 36566 CHARGES FEBRUARY . - : RIOUS T:, 02/ 25/91...:„:, .. , ,.: C IP 87170..':','i, - /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR I VAT $0.00 04/03/91 . 13 1245 16 17 18 19 20 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************************:. 17 10 $303. 01 21 22 23 24 19 00 21 R LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. :: I, - • -.-'-• - 101320. - y110-400-3302-4187. • : 00280'".':': ' - ' ' $255.39 ' , ' . 71597 00286 ' 36567 - - - - - GENERAL SERVICES . BADGES ,, 71597 ',"-,.,-..''' 03/27/91-- r - ::, -.- ,' ., ... ' PARKING , ENF : " ' /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE . $249.47 , 04/03/91 25 26 27 28 22 23 26 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $255. 39 29 30 31 32 25 27 R LOS ANGELES CO. PUBLIC WORKS • 00879„001-202-ocoq-2020 01131 $4,000. 00 : VARIOUS 08846 36568 HYDROLOGY STUDY, . 60% ' RIOUS ” /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $0. 00 04/03/91 33 34 35 36 78 23 3.3 R LOS ANGELES CO. PUBLIC WORKS 00679 150-202-0000-2020 00015 $1,291.55 OVERLAY FIELDWORK CIP137 1270 09/01/89 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 1270 00472 36568 $0.00 04/03/91 37 38 39 40 31 32 33 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************31•*,****.************41:******441******;***41****a****41'14-**' • , ,• „ , . .• . • . • , $5,291..55 41 42 43 44 34 35 35 R DIANNE*LOUGHIN 03628 001-400-2101-4316 00724 $16.00 LUNCHES COMPUTER CLASS 03/18/91 POLICE. /TRAINING 01267 36569 $0.00 04/03/91 45 46 .47 48 37 28 39 — ' • ' " ' •-• ' ' - ' . • .... - - *** VENDOR TOTAL. *******-***************-*********-************************-*********-* • .. . . . • . . , . • • . , . •, , , • . • • . . . • „ . . . . . _ , _ , - • - - • • • • • , $1-6-00 : • 49 5951 52 40 41 42 R LOUIS THE TAILOR, ,INC. 00079 001-400-2101-4187 00418 $318.44 404388 01732 36570 SAFETY VEST/R. COCHRAN 04388 03/11/91 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $318.44 04/03/91 43 44 45. '..*** VENDOR TOTAL ' , ••• , 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 47 68 49 60 51 R LUCKY NURSERY 03909 001-400-3101-4309 00097 $296.90 PLANTS/GOULD MEDIAN • 20908 03/22/91 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 20906 02032 36571 $296.90 04/03/91 ***TVENDOR.TOTAL **********,**********************************************4i*4*****$296:90 52 53 54 R MAC'S LIFT GATE, INC. LIFT GATE/METER VAN 03944 110-400-3302-5403 00012 $1,392.66 258 03/21/91 PARKING ENF /VEHICLES 258 01631 36572 $1,402.61 04/03/91 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 '2 .11L, 41k AIL 3 a a Flar /^ fr rr rr 2 F-1{'4AN CE=SFA340 TIME 16:09:16 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR.04/O9/91:. PAGE DATE 04/03/91 0010 4 PAY VENDOR—NAIIE DESCRIPTION 5 6 VND # AGGAWNT NW DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION I NwREr P9—# -CH K # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL***:z•***********************:t**************************************** 9 10 11 12 10 11 2 R LINDA#MARX REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 14653 03951 001-210-0000-2110 04180 $100.00 9014653 01578 36573 03/20/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 04/03/91 13 14 15 16 13 14 15 *** VENDOR :TOTAL .#*#*******#**********as-*****#**•n3F*******************a.******** 44,90,100, 17 18 19 20 16 17 18 R MASTER K-9 MUZZLE FOR K-9 1,178 03120 02/04/91 001-400-2101-4316 00722 210005 POLICE $79. 88 /TRAINING 1178 01778 36574 $0.00 04/03/91 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 **- VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************` • 22 23 24 R TAYLOR*METTERS REFUND ENROLLMENT FEE 14596 03958 001-300-0000-3826 02164 $15.00 03/19/91 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES 14596 01844 36575 $0.00 04/03/91 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 25 26 27 *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************#*********######********* k****##***********##***##** 33 34 35 35 28 29 30 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION MISC CHARGES FEBRUARY 784C2 00388 001-400-2101-4310 00308 $96.68 930784C2 00248 36576 03/12/91 POLICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 04/03/91 37 33 39 45 31 32 33 MOBIL ❑IL CREDIT CORPORATION00388 001-400-2201-4310 'MISC CHARGES FEBRUARY 784C2 03/12/91; $30.57 930784C2 00248 36576 /MOTOR, FUELS`: AND LUBES X0.00 04/03/91' 41 42 43 34 35 36 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION MISC CHARGES FEBRUARY 784C2 00388 110-400-3302-4310 00139 $20.27 930784C2 00248 03/12/91 ' PARKING ENF /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 36576 04/03/91 45 46 47 48 37 30 39 ##* VENDOR TOTAL************it********************** ************ ***** 49 5o 51 52 40 41 42 R MONARCH BROOM CHARGES MARCH 00084 001-400-3103-4309 01138 $842.85 8063/8062 00347 /8062 03/19/91 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 04/03/91 36977 53 54 55 56 43 44 45 •*** VENDOR TOTAL****-********************#*****#***#********�******************et******: $5422.. 68 -- 57 50 59 6,1 46 47 45 R MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION CODE SUPPS/ZONING REPRNT 26429 00556 001-400=1131-4201 00640 $3,018.73 03/12/91 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 26429 09363 36578 $0.00 04/03/91 til 63 64 49 50 51 *7** VENDOR .TOTAL`**********************#*********************************=**4*********: 015.73 52 53 54 R SHEILA*NASH REFUND ENROLLMENT FEE 14736 03957 001-300-0000-3826 02165 $20.00 03/19/91 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES 14736 01843 36579 $0. 00 . 04/03/91 65 66 97 70 71 72 55 56 74 75 7% I R •O: 14 3 7 9 9 FINANCE—SFA34f TIME 16:09:16 '_.PAY VENDOR—NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF. HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LICT FOR: 04/09/91 VND # AGGOUNT—NUMBER—TRN tt AMOUN DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION P -AGC 00 DATE 04/03/91 NV/REF- PO it —CHK. AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 • 12 11 2 15 17 10 9 21 R OFFICE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION DIRECTORY/MINORITY BUS. 03950 001-400-1203-4305 00308 $15.00 03/27/91 PERSONNEL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************** R PAUL G. *OLSEN 01351 36580 $0.00 04/03/91 03956 110-300-0000-3302 39343 $28.00 CITE 96985 01155 36581 REFUND DOUBLE PAYMENT 96985 03/21/90 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 04/03/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL .****t•********* * ******* ******414****4 'x'*as''t * $28.00 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 '117 23 24 R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER REPAIRS/PAINT HB7 00093 001-400-2101-4311 01117 12256 03/22/91 POLICE $502. 80 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 12256 01753 36582 $502.80 04/03/91 29 30 31 32 25 26 27 23 29 30 31 32 33 *** VENDOR TOTAL************************************************************* R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE MARCH CHARGES COMP LINES RIOUS 00321 03/07/91 $502. 80 001-400-2101-4304 00775 POLICE $163. 35 /TELEPHONE VARIOUS 00036 36583 $0. 00 04/03/91 33 34 35 36 37 30 39 40 *** VENDOR TOTAL. **** t'************************************************ .** '#**-"***** $163:35 42 43 44 34 35 36 R PACIFIC EQUIP & IRRIGATION CUSHMAN PARTS 65219. 00406 110-400-3302-4311 00679 $3,009.31 03/14/91 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE 65219 01633 36584 $0.00 04/03/91 45 46 47 48 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 15 47 48 49 51 53 54 *** VENDOR.. ****eta********'*********************'********'******************** t** R PACTEL CELLULAR — LA MOBILE CHARGES MARCH' 31591 03/15/91 POLICE 03209 001-400-2101-4304 VENDOR:;. TOTAL ; ************************************ ****************** $3, 409:31 00779 $726.13 1124161031591 00350 /TELEPHONE R PEP BOYS MARCH CHARGES VENDOR TOTAL ********* t•* i****az* R PERFORMING TREE, INC. CHILDRENS THEATRE SERIES $0.00 36585 04/03/91 00608 001-400-2201-4311 00387 $153.26 03/22/91 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE eteFef******ea**** er*** **area****..*eeer***** **** $153:.2 00353 36586 50.00 04/03/91 00600 001-400-4601-4201 00783 $1,740.00 02/05/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 01806 36587 $0.00 04/03/91 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 65 • 67 68 69 70 71 72 55 55 73 74 75 4. A.- • 1► e a s r*; (1 2 F—INANCE—SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIGT.: TIME 16:09:16 FOR 04/09/91 PAY VENDOR -NAME VND # . AG-G-GUNT NUt4BER- N $ AMBUN-T 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 6 17 20 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION • *** VENDOR TOTAL :-�r###*0*-ii4#*###**#####4/..41 #*#****##*##***#**11.444 R PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRAKE SERV WHEEL ALIGNMENT/POLICE U 228 A 1 DATE ,04/03/91 2 3 • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 03910 001-400-2101-4311 01118 $69.00 03/25/91 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *4* VENDOR TOTAL :.####*#***####*.r************.i *****tree##arse*********. **** ****4 R POSTAL INSTANT PRESS VISUAL INSP PROGRAM LABE 16747 $69.00.` 228 01763 36588 $69.00 04/03/91 00296 001-400-2201-4305 00450 $68.80 96C16747 11257 36589 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $6S.80 04/03/91 02/07/91 FIRE 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 ***.VENDOR TOTAL:******######****** *41.** *#####*****##* * *##**tai************#*####**** R PROF COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLERS SERVICES MARCH 02526 001-400-2101-4311 03/19/91 POLICE 01116 $400.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00354 36590 $0.00 04/03/91 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 so 51 52 53 54 55 59 �.7 *## VENDOR TOTAL,***************************** P. PROTECTIVE HEALTH SERVICES SYRINGE CONTAINERS/POLIC 0141N 03943 001-400-2101-4305 01480 $110.37 03/25/91 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES * :VENDOR ..TOTAL,************########*4***4*#*#####*#************************ * ***#*_ R FRED*PRYOR SEMINARS, INC. SEMINAR REG/T. YATES 43669 47014IN 01776 36591 $116.50 04/03/91 00298 001-400-4202-4316 00183 $59.00 02/28/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************* *-*** ************** ***** #ac-#** *****43F #a�4 117 R ANN*RODE REFUND ENROLLMENT FEE 03925 001-300-0000-3826 03/06/91 843669 01490 36592 $59.00 04/03/91 02162 $25.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL #*#####*?r##***#*#******###*#***a�*###*#**#*###**###*ar•*# -******#at•##a� ; "z R TOM*SAKELL 03948 001-30Q-0000-3826 REFUND ENROLLMENT FEE 12817 03/27/91 $25. 00 02167 $20.00 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL ******##*** ***####**##:******7********************** *************** R OFCR R.*SALDANA MEALS/LODGING PRINT CLSS 02165 03/18/91 001-400-2101-4312 POLICE $20.00 01833 36593 $0.00 04/03/91 12817 01845 36594 $0.00 04/03/91 01685 $315.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 01264 36595 $0.00 04/03/91 33 34 35 36 37 33 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 40 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 59 59 C.0 62 63 64 65 GO 68 65 70 71 72 14 14 11. 1l 411 • e .01 els Alb 17, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH F—I-NANCE=-SF-A349 DEMAND LIST TIME 16:09:16 t` FOR 04/09/91 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 PAY VENDOR—NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R JIMMIE LEE*SHAW MEALS/LODGING CLASS AG 013 DATE 04/03/91`: VND # ACCOUNT—NUMBER ' TRN !f P,MOUN DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00960 001-400-2101-4313 00335 03/18/91 POLICE $315.00 NW-REf Pfl • AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $323. 00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL et:e##stat*et*#**-x#*####*##**#**##*###*at:###*#####*##*##u-#*#*3F#*####***iF#* R SHEPHERD MACHINERY COMPANY PURCHASE CRAWLER 41259 01260 $0. 00 36596 ,p4/03/91 '03946 160-400-3102-5403 00006 $68,953.50 03/28/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /VEHICLES 15560/41259 02042 $82,132.88 36597 04/03/91 20 *** VENDOR TOTAL .***##***********#*****##*#*#**#****#********* t*********#**###****## '$68,953.50 ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 22 24 25 26 27 20 29 30 91 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC CHARGES MARCH 93914 R: SMART & FINAL IRIS MISC CHARGES MARCH- . COMPANY:' 00114 03/27/91 00114. 03/27/91.• 001-400-2101-4306 00949 $81.42 493923/493914 00360 36598 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE • $0.00 04/03/91 POLICE 001-400-4601-4305 00945 `:COMM RESOURCES $73.96 ' `':;' 493923/493914 /OFFICE: OPER,. SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL#*##**sr*#***####*#*##*#*####jt#*3F#3r#*at##*####*tt-**et##*3t##3t*iE* -at#***#** SO CALIF' RAPID TRANSIT;DISTR''`, MO.:: PASS AND STAMP SALES:' 54187 • R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. MO. PASS AND STAMP SALES 54869- 4** VENDOR TOTAL';:** R SOUTH BAY FIRE EXTINGUISHER CHARGES MARCH 8730 00843 •.`s 01/31/91 00843 03/29/91 00113 03/13/91 $155. 38 145-400-3403-4251 ;00096 $1,572:00 BUS. ,PASS SUBSDY `/CONTRACT,'. -SERV ICE/GOVT.:,• 145-400-3403-4251 00097 $1,460.00 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $3, 032:00 001-400-2101-4309 00394 $15.98 *** VENDOR TOTAL #*#*# #*#* ***'*. # ### ### # ## R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL MISC. BLOOD ALCOHOL ** :VENDOR;,TOTAL. 44-* RIOUS 00107 03/28/91 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT BAIL FOR COURT DATES POLICE 00360 36598 $0.00 04/03/91 36599 $0.00 : .'' 04/03/91'. 54869 01639 $0. 00 36599 04/03/91 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 8730 00361 $0.00 001-400-2101-4201 00759 $189.52 VARIOUS 01784 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *3f"7Fst'�£ ii"a'*"**'t"****'###4444444444 if"*****F'il'm'#. 00400 110-300-0000-3302 03/28/91 36600 04/03/91 36601 04/03/91 39342 $310.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING 01642: $0. 00 36602 04/03/91 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 75/ r Cr; /1 2 3 4 5 411. • r. 6 FINANCE=SFA340 TIME 16:09:16 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND-6IST PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION FOR 04/09/91,?; VND tt AGGOUNT—NUMBER TR DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE 04/03/91 V7LRCr ro * CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 3 - 4 5 6 7 8 e 9 3t3tit VENDOR TOTAL ****.1 * ******************************* ****************#; #**3f#a ***** 9 10 11 12 10 11 12 R SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND SERVICES MARCH 32191 03882 001-400-4101-4201 00082 $460.00 32191 00378 36603 03/21/91 PLANNING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT .$0.00 04/03/91 13 14 15 16 4 *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************************************************41•3f>t3r ***3z. $460.00. 17 18 19 20 16 17 18 R STEPHENS, INC. JAIL BEDDING/TOWELS 01029 001-400-2101-4306 00950 $535.72 67673 03/28/91 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 67673 01777 36604 $554. 50 04/03/91 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 *** VENDOR .TOTAL - *******'************************** f.******************************33 25 26 2', 26 22 23 24 R 'SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. EASTER CAMP MOVIE RENTAL 22564 03158 03/29/91 001-400-4601-4201 00780 $166.00 522564 01805 36605 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $166.00 04/03/91 05 30 31 32 25 26 27 *** VENDOR TOTAL ************3333*******************3>•-r *******************if******* :$166.00 33 34 35 36 26 29 30 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC CHARGES MARCH 00124 160-400-3102-4309 00587 $59.73 3746H 03/12/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 73746H 00368 36606 $0. 00 04/03/91 37 3D 49 31 32 33 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********3z*****3e3s4***********3}3t•3 ******************3t***4* ***ai-******• 41 42 43 44 34 35 36 R CITY OF*TORRANCE 00841 001-400-2101-4251 00360 $7.50 PRISONER IDS FEBRUARY 03039 03/11/91 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 103039 00068 36607 $0.00 04/03/91 45 e 46 • 47 .4 48 37 38 39 *** VENDOR TOTAL3t3tif#3t3;3s3r*3r***3t• #a if*#if*3t***3r3r3e3tiF3eiz•#iz•#3r3F3F3rit3f*3t•3e'fit•#iF3t•3e;tat#3r t3t#if*if#*3t*? *.. $7.50 40 41 42 R TOUCH OF CARPET FLOOR COVERING/POLICE DE 3105 01930 305-400-8606-4201 00006 $1,589.00 03/08/91 CIP 87-606 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 3105 02014 36608 $1,589%00 04/03/91 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 5C 43 44 45 *3t* VENDOR .TOTAL ****************************3t***************x*********3t;t3t3t3f 3t3f3t3t ' ** 51, 519.00 57 56 59 69 46 47 40 R USW/PSG/NUG MEMBRSHP,ELLEDGE/LOUGHIN 03949 03/28/91 001-40Q-2101-4315 00186 $100.00 POLICE /MEMBERSHIP 01781 36609 $0.00 04/03/91 U1 52 63 64 49 5o 51 *** VENDOR TOTAL .**8.*3r3t3t********3t**,*****************************it******************= 5100. 00 5.1 66 67 Co 52 53 54 R BRIAN*VAUGHN REFUND, INVALID CITE 03959 110-300-0000-3302 39344 $18.00 03/20/91 /COURT FINES/PARKING 01640 $0.00 36610 04/03/41 70 71 72 4.. 56 /3 74 ,/ SO 2 ETNANCE-SF-A34O ' TIME 16:09:16 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND --6 ST FOR 04/09/91 --F'A�__. VENDOR—NAMF VND "--.. ACGOUNT—N'JMBER TRN it AMOUNT INWREF DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AGE 001:, DATE 04/03/91: PO # CHK—# . AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP Il 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 11 9 *3* VENDOR TOTAL ar#-#at***#**#**#*#ir*#at*atat**##**#*#*#######**aa###**ar#***####*##**#**#*# $18..00.. R VERNON PAVING COMPANY MISC CHARGES MARCH 20866 00019 03/12/91 001-400-3103-4309 01137 $69.38 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 20866 00372 36611 $0.00 ,,,,04/03/91 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 13 1.1 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************************************************************t•****** R WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY LEGAL PUBLICATIONS *** VENDOR TOTAL '•t*********** t; $69.'36. 00141 001-400-1131-4201 00641 $192.91 03/05/91 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 09362 36612 $0.00 04/03/91 R WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 00131, 001-400-3104-4309 00659 $1,661.40 STREET SIGN POSTS 87392 01/11/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 187392 01453 36613 $1,665.30 04/03/91 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 25 25 27 ### VENDOR TOTAL*##*?*#*##**#*##*#*******#***##*#**#*#######*##*###****##*#x*#**### :: X1:661:40: 33 34 35 36 28 29 37 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 R SALLY A. *WHITE SERVICES, 3/19/91 • 00140 001-400-4102-4201 00302 $102.00 04/01/91 PLANNING COMM /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL .*##*******************4.**444************************4******* R SGT MARK*WRIGHT MEALS, VICE OPS COURSE S 102: 00 00133 001-400-2101-4313 00332 $393.75 03/21/91 POLICE *** VENDOR TOTAL:: t *************** **** ****************• *** ************************* • 01907 $0. 00 36614 04/03/91 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC R XEROX CORPORATION BUYOUT FIRST FLOOR MACH 90491 01268 36615 $0.00 04/03/91 00135 001-400-1208-6900 00296 $537.83 04/01/91 GEN APPROP /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL ******* *******************4.444 ***#************ *** PAY CODE TOTAL*************************************iter*************************** *** .TOTAL WARRANTS ***** ************** ************************************4 $130, 879. 07 $140075::.03 528690491 00021 36616 $0.00 04/03/91 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 55 56 73 74 75 7y Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council March 28, 1991 For the Meeting of April 9, 1991 CANCELLATION ON WARRANTS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. • #036262 - 3/12/91 Eastman Kodak Company $383.24 - Account Number 001-400-1208-4305. The incorrect vendor number was picked up from the vendor open P.O. list in error. The warrant was not mailed. #036295 - 3/12/91 - Monterey Sheraton Hotel - $217.80 - Account Number 001-400-4102-4317. We found out this hotel was booked after the warrant was issued. #036303 - 3/12/91 - Paul's Rentals - $53.23 - Account Number 110- 400-3302-4311 for $26.49, 110-400-3302-4311 for $26.74. Incor- rect vendor number picked up from vendor open P.O. list in error. The warrant was not mailed. #036476 - 3/26/91 - Ann Rode - $45.00 - Account Number 001-300- 0000-3826. Two vendors combined due to transposition of vendor numbers when entered. The warrant was not mailed. Gary Br sch City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact Viki Copeland Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council April 1, 1991 City Council Meeting of April 9, 1991 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. April 23, 1991 Resolution declaring May Water Awareness Month VPD recommendation on sidewalk scrubber Selection of proposals for Workers' Comp 3rd party administrator Coastal Conservancy Pier grant Goal 8 5/16 Options to increasing service level of street sweeping Bid spec. for new telephone system for City offices General Services Reorganization Plan Janitorial Maintenance contract call for bids Downtown & Pier maintenance contract - call for bids Quarterly Review CIP program 8/20 Gann limit - Appropriations subject to Consider date for joint meeting with Planning Commission Council 3/12 Review of Homeowners' Assn. packet distrib- ution Info. item on Montrose Chemical case Public Hearing Appeal of Planning Commission conditions on CUP for 3232 Manhattan Ave., Dan's Liquor Public Works Director General Services Director Personnel Director Community Resources Dir. Public Works Dir. General Services Director City Manager Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Finance Director Planning Director City Mgr./City Clerk Personnel Director Planning Director May 14, 1991 Proclamation: Public Works Week (May 19 to. May 23 City Mgr. 2/25 Admin. memo on con- sultants Selection of computer consultant CIP 89-512 Accept Basketball Courts as complete Street Lighting Assessment a) resolution approving report b) resolution setting public hearing Greenbelt parking designs Crossing Guards Assessment a) resolution approving report b) resolution setting public hearing Project Touch Lease Renewal (Rm. 3) May 28, 1991 Selection of Records Management consultant Council 8/14 Review parking on ped- estrian sts./review ways to enforce no parking in front yards South Bay Cycles compliance with CUP June 11, 1991 Dispute Resolution Services Lease Renewal Project Touch Lease Renewal (Rm. 11). Status report on Rule XV - Trip reduction plan June 25, 1991 Rotation of Mayor Status of fire flow improvements Public Hearings Public Hearing - Street Lighting 2 - City Mgr./Finance Gen. Svcs. Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Community Resources Dir. City Clerk/Gen. Svcs. Public Works Dir. Planning Director Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Personnel Director Public Safety Director Public Works Director Public Hearing - Crossing Guards September 24, 1991 CIP 89-406, Accept sewer project as complete October 22, 1991 RFP for Traffic Engineer January, 1992 Appeal of P.C. denial of request to allow a 2nd story office addition providing less than required off- street parking at 415 Pier Ave. Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Public Works Director Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council 5/8 Discuss financial arrangements on oil project City Manager Council 5/8 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project Planning Director Goal 4 5/16 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function Finance Director City Mgr. 7/24 3 -hr. vs. 2 -hr. parking meter limit in the downtown (refer to VPD) General Services Director Council 8/14 Review of standard CUP conditions Planning Dir. Council 10/9 Map and time schedule for street sweeping Public Wks. Dir. Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Dir. City Mgr. 12/17 Photocopiers Public Safety. Director Council 1/22 Research parking cut off in lot at 3rd St. Pub.Wks./Bldg./City Mgr. Council 2/12 Fiesta cost/benefit study Finance Dir. VPD lots management contract renewal RFP General Services Director City Mgr. 2/21 Council 2/20 RFP for computer system General Svcs. Director Follow-up procedures to Council items City Manager Conceptual approval of Greenbelt steps Dept. 3/6 Code of conduct for City employees Council 3/12 Report on permit park- ing program w/imple- menting measures Council 3/12 South School Conceptual design Dept. 3/27 CIP 89-176 Call for bids, traffic signal pre-emption City Mgr. 3/25 Amendment of ordinance regulating real estate signs Council Bid spec. for office systems (furniture) City Mgr. 3/26 Revised funding for canine program Council 3/26 Selection of insurance broker Council 3/26 Ballot measures. Public Works Director Comm. Resources Director General Services Director Community Resources Public Works Director Building Director Finance Director Public Safety Director Personnel Planning/City Mgr. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council irt-c-/, 5/-9-91 April 1, 1991 City Council Meeting of April 1, 1991 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of March 1991. Respectfully submitted, Gary. Bru#lsch City Treasurer NOTED: 7 / Kevin Northcraft City Manager 111 INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - MARCH 1991 DATE OF INVESTMENT DATE OF MATURITY INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 03/01/91 Investment Investment BALANCE 03/31/91 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way BALANCE 03/01/91 BALANCE 03/31/91 CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment U.S. TREASURY BOND: Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment FHLMC: $5,777,000.00 800,000.00 <150,000.00> $6,427,000.00 Account $ 667,116.73 667,116.73 500,000.00 $ 499,326.42 $1,001,542.12 $ 500,845.79 $ 999,492.83 $1,019,779.01 $1,023,029.89 3/05/91 5/19/88 1/03/90 3/06/90 3/08/90 4/20/90 5/14/90 9/14/90 3/19/91 5/20/93 12/31/91 2/29/92 2/29/92 3/31/92 2/15/93 6/30/94 8.002% 8..06% 9.10% 7.71 8.50 8.50% 8.763% 8.49% 8.50% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Investment $ 248,733.64 INVESTMENT TOTAL $12,886,866.43 SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 02/01/91 $ 507,308.29 Adjustment 182,398.03 BALANCE 02/28/91 689,706.32 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO. BALANCE 6/30/90 $ 10,711.04 Adjustment 422.97. BALANCE 1/31/91 TRUSTEE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 11,134.01 $ 700,840.33 $13,587,706.76 Respectfully Submitted, Gary Bruts¢h City Treasurer „- z 3/26/87 3/1/17 8.0% 8.625% 7.5% Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 4, 1991 City Council Meeting of. April 9, 1991 STATUS OF LITIGATION REGARDING OWNERSHIP OF HERMOSA GREENBELT Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background: During negotiations for the purchase of the former railroad right-of-way from the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, the City was made aware that approximately 20% of the right-of-way area within the City boundaries of Hermosa Beach was subject to litigation. The litigation involves private individuals and the Railway Company over ownership of the property. Provisions were made in the City's acquisition agreement to protect the City's interest regardless of how the litigation is determined. Escrow remains open on that 20% with the Railway Company until the litigation is resolved, The purchase price is fixed at the amount agreed to at the time of the original agreement. At the March 26, 1991, Councilmember Creighton requested a status report on this litigation. Analysis: Since the original lawsuit filing, a number of depositions and some discovery have occurred by both parties. The case is filed in Torrance Superior Court, and a trial date now has been established of November 4, 1991. The mandatory settlement conference likely will be held in October, 1991. While the case could be decided within several weeks after that trial date, appeal by either party could extend the final resolution for up to an additional two years. Kevin B. North City Manager KBN/ld CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Water Quality and Conservation DATE: March 12, 1991 The Planning Commission has serious concern about water quality .and conservation. Three issues of concern are as follows: 1. What can the City do, or is doing to conserve water during the drought. 2. Gray water, e.g., water used for laundering cloths, should be studied for its potential to be reused for irrigation. 3. Is the City, or will the City help support the Heal the Bay program? A program to restore the Santa Monica Bay. Recommendation Refer to staff to update Planning Commission on City's efforts in these three areas. CONCUR: jarf-. // / Bevin B. North aft City Manager p/memo2 if Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 1, 1991 Regular Meeting of April 9, 1991 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 1991 TO JUNE 30, 1994 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to call for bids and issue addenda as necessary. Background: California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. has been under contract for the last 6 years for the provision of the landscape maintenance at City parks and medians. The contract will expire on June 30, 1991. The following are parks landscape areas to be covered by the proposed contract: PARKS 1. Valley Park 2. Clark Stadium 3. Com. Center/Civic Center 4. Edith Rodaway Park 5. Seaview Parkette 6. Fort Lots of Fun Parkette 7. Moondust Parkette 8. Greenwood Park 9. Bicentennial Park 10. Kay Etow Parkette 11. Ingleside Parkette 12. 4th & Prospect 13. 8th & Valley 14. Scout Park 15. Ardmore & 5th 16. Greenbelt Park 17. Sandhill Parkette 18. 3rd & Prospect The following are median landscape areas to be covered in the proposed contract: MEDIANS M1. HERMOSA AV (City Lmt to 2nd) M2 HERMOSA AV (2nd to 10th) M3. HERMOSA AV (10th to 14th) M4. HERMOSA AV (14th to CityLmt) M5. PIER AV (Strand to Hermosa) 16. PIER AV (Hermosa to Valley M7. STRAND @ 2ndStreet M8. STRAND @ 15th Street M9. STRAND @ 16th Street M10. STRAND @ 18th Street M11. STRAND @ 22nd Street M12. STRAND @ Longfellow M13. STRAND @ 35th Street M14. 10th @ PCH M15. 28th @ Valley M16. 29th @ Valley M17 30th @ Manhattan M18. 31st @ Manhattan 1419. AVIATION (B'ndary to PCH) M20. Strand 33rd M21. GOULD (Upper) M22. GOULD (Lower) M23. PCH (24th to Gould) M24. Valley Dr/Herondo M25. PCH/Aviation M26. 14th & Man Av (Prkng Lot) M27. Lot C M28. PCH/8th (Barricade) M29. Artesia (PCH E to Harper) M30. Pier Head M31. Lot A The current cost of the contract for both parks and medians maintenance is: 1988 - 1989 $140,520.00 1989 - 1990 $147,660.00 1990 1991 $155,160.00 The proposed contract is scheduled to run from July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1994, and at the option of the City Council of the City, with the consent of the Contractor the contract may be renewable for a period not to exceed three years. This bid package will be sent to approximately 8 vendors. Analysis: A copy of the bid package is available for review in the office of the city clerk. The recommendation allows the City to obtain bids of evaluating cost and service. Respectfully submitted, NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE Anthony Antich Director of Public Works' Concur: for the purpose Kevih B. Northcroft City Manager QMH A 9--9) March 28, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1991 AGREEMENT WITH WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the attached agreement with the West Basin Municipal Water District. Background: The West Basin Municipal Water District has expended their funds to hire a landscape architect to prepare conceptual drawings of drought tolerant landscaping for the Greenbelt. These drawings have been a guide to the recent tree plantings. Analysis: This is a no cost agreement to the City. West Basin has asked that the City sign the attached agreement because West Basin needs the, agreement to comply with their rules and to protect their liability. Alternative: Another alternative available to Council and considered by staff is, do not sign the agreement - thereby reducing the relationship between the City and West Basin. R=sp tfully submi -,d: A YYony Antich Public Works Director Concur: Mary Comm ity Resources Director Kevin B.'Northcraft City Manager Attachments: pworks/WBMWD cc: West Basin Municipal Water District - 1 - DIRECT ORS CHARLES L STUART, Pres. LAWRENCE P. GALLAGHER, Vice Pres. RICHARD HEATH, Treas. MICHAEL W. SWEENEY, Secy. EDWARD C. LITTLE March 20, 1991 WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WA1 ER DISTRICT Mr. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Antich: 303 GARNET STREET REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90277 TELEPHONE: (213) 379-5455 STAFF , RICHARD W. ATC'ATER Gent -rat Munaycr WAYNE LEMIEUX, Attorney RECEIVED MAR 2 5 tali Pim! WnRKR JFpT, Mr. Lawrence Moss has indicated that he has completed the conceptual and preliminary drawings for Hermosa Beach's xeriscape garden area. Attached for your City's approval is our agreement. Please review documents, have signed and return to me for processing of our payments to Lawrence Moss and Associates. Sincerely, Sarann Kruse Public Affairs Manager Enclosures SK:lj kruse\antich.391 XERISCAPE DEMONSTRATION GARDEN AGREEMENT f March 1991 WEST BASIN 'MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, hereinafter West Basin, and the CITY OF Hermosa Beach hereinafter City, agree as follows: Section 1. Purpose Under this agreement, West Basin will provide a design for a drought resistent demonstration garden at certain public facilities owned by the City, and the City will install and maintain drought resistent plants in accordance with the design. Section 2. Xeriscape Plan (a) West Basin shall supply City with a landscape design prepared by a licensed landscape architect for the installation of drought resistent plants at the agreed upon location of the City. The plan. known also as a xeriscape plan. shall be designed to assist the City in reducing -water consumption at City facilities and to demonstrate to the constituents of the City how drought resistent plants maybe incorporated into their landscaping plans. (b) The landscape architest engaged by West -Basin shall consult with the City during.the preparation of the plan to insure that the plan may be implemented within a budget established by the City. Section 3. Xeriscape Planting (a) City shall implement the plan by planting and thereafter maintaining drought resistent plants as shown in the plan. (b) The City shall spend no more thant1/ $ !\ to plant the demonstration garden. The City shall maintain the demonstration garden in accordance with the plan for at least five (5) years from the date of this agreement. Section 4. Indemnification (a) West Basin shall save and hold the City and its officers, agents and employees free and harmless from any and all costs, liability or damages arising out of the design of the landscaping. plan described above. (b) City shall save and hold West Basin, its officers, agents and employees free and harmless from any cost, liability or damages arising out of the implementation -of the landscaping plan described herein. APPROVED: CITY OF By Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APP _0 D AS TO FOR City .Attorney WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT By President 1' ATTEST: Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: District Counsel April 2, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1991 AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR SLURRY SEALING, CIP 89-170 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Tierra Engineering Company for contract administration and inspection services. 2. Authorize a not to exceed amount for the project as follows: Inspection $19,656 Contingency 2,344 Not To Exceed Amount $22,000 3. Authorize staff to issue addenda as necessary within budget limitations. Background: On February 12, 1991, City Council authorized staff to advertise for contract administration and inspection services pertaining to CIP 89-170. This project is for repairing and slurry sealing all asphalt streets west of Valley Drive, except those streets where utility improvement work is scheduled in the near future. Analysis: The analysis is divided as follows: 1. The Respondents 2. Interviews 3. Tentative Choice 1. The Respondents Four respondents submitted proposals. All proposals are available for review in the City Clerk's office. A list of the respondents' costs and hours are shown below: Total No. of Hours Respondent Cost Proposed 1. ASL Consultants $19,580 402 2. BSI Consultants $20,675 376 3. Harris & Associates $34,628 436 4. Tierra Engineering $19,656 401 2. Interviews All Four respondents were given the opportunity to be interviewed by City staff. One respondent declined to be interviewed. The inspector from each of the consulting firms was interviewed. The results of the interviews are available for review in the Public Works Department. 3. Tentative Choice Based on the interviews, staff considers all three respondents interviewed to be qualified to do the work and provide the services required by the City, making the selection difficult. After a comparative analysis, Tierra Engineering is the recommended firm for the following reasons: 1. Their inspector has more related and pertinent experience at various levels. He has over 30 years of experience as a senior, principal and chief inspector. 2. He has provided instruction to other inspectors for the City of Los Angeles both in the field and in the office. (Training of City staff for inspecting future slurry seal projects, if time constraints allow, is one of the requirements). Fiscal Impact: Proposed Inspection Contract Contingency $19,656 2,344 Not To Exceed Amount $22,000 Alternatives: Other alternatives available to City Council and considered by staff are: 1. Award the agreement to another respondent. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Brian Gengle/ Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance ty/ssitem Lynn Terry _Deputy City Engineer NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE Anthony Antich Director of Public Works j:oe Kevin B. North raft City Manager April 3, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of April 9, 1991 EXTENSION OF CITY YARD LEASE WITH MACPHERSON OIL COMPANY Recommendation: Itis recommended that the City. Council authorize the Mayor to sign the attached extension of the lease of the City yard with Macpherson Oil Company to extend the drilling term for three months, to July 15, 1991. Background: The lease with Macpherson Oil Company providing for use of unoc- cupied portions of the City yard site for oil drilling purposes was approved on October 14, 1986, and has been extended four times. The last two times the City Council chose to extend the lease for only three months. This set a high priority for resolution of the current negotiations with the Oil Company. Analysis: A tentative agreement has been reached and announced, but prepa- ration of the legal documents and business point language has been time consuming. A draft agreement now has been reviewed by both parties' rep- resentatives, and a meeting will be held this month to resolve language questions. As soon as these matters are resolved, the agreement will be presented to the City Council for approval. Kevin B. Northc%a City Manager KBN/ld cc: Macpherson Oil Company Planning Director 1 k 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City Clerk, City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDMENT TO OIL AND GAS LEASE NO. 5 This Oil and. Gas Lease Amendment No. 5 is entered into this 9th day of April, 1991, amending Oil and Gas Lease No. 1, with Macpherson Oil Company entered into on October 14, 1986, and pre- viously amended on December 16, 1986, September 27, 1988, October 9, 1990, and January 8, 1991. Section 1 of Exhibit "B" is amended to read as follows: 1. DRILLING TERM The "drill term" is that period of time in which developer shall commence drilling operations. The drill term shall be ex- tended to July 15, 1991. LESSEE: Macpherson Oil LESSOR: City of Hermosa Beach, CA By: (Signature) (Signature) (Name of Officer) (Name of Officer) (Title) (Title) (Date) (Date) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and Members of -the Hermosa Beach City Council April 4, 1991 City Council Meeting of April 9, 1991 RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT STAFF TO CAUSE THE OWNERS OF THE PRIVATE PAYPHONES ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY . TO MOVE THOSE PRIVATE PAYPHONES Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Staff's plan to; (a) relocate the private payphones from the P.R.O.W. to an area totally upon private property or totally public property, where feasible (b) negotiate with GTE to contract for use of P.R.O.W., the City becoming the beneficiary of the commissions paid from the revenue received from the use of the private payphone. (c) remove those private payphones intruding upon the P.R.O.W., deemed a nuisance or not providing a public service. Background: At your regularly scheduled meeting of October 9, 1990 the City Council authorized Staff to proceed with recovering revenue for private payphones on City property, not currently being collected. In pursuit of this direction, Staff investigated those locations where placement of private payphones onto P.R.O.W. was at issue. Attached, is the report from Engineering Technician Gary Wheaton, showing those locations where private payphones are located upon the P.R.O.W., and the approximate percentage of the payphone structure that is on the P.R.O.W.. The Public Works Department, has jurisdictional responsibility for the P.R.O.W., and enforcement of violations thereof. Analysis: Placement of these private payphones, without prior authorization and permit from the City, constitutes a violation of Sections 29-6, and 29-7 of the HBMC (Streets and Sidewalks, attached). All the "at issue" payphones listed intrude upon the P.R.O.W. by some percentage of actual placement or use of P.R.O.W. air space. Some of these private payphones are owned by GTE, some are owned by other companies. The City currently has contracts with GTE for ten (10) private payphones on City property. Approximate revenue received from GTE on these payphones is $1,000 per year. In addition, we alsb receive 19% commission from ATT long distance, on long distance usage. This equates to an- aggregate total of approximately $2,000+ per year on these payphones alone. The commissions currently paid on the revenue generated by the use of those phones on the P.R.O.W., is revenue the City is entitled to receive, by virtue of the fact that they are on. the P.R.O.W.. GTE has been notified of the City's intent to require removal of the "at issue" private payphones. The non -GTE payphone company owners are also being noticed. Exclusive of the payphones located at 1 Pier Avenue (6), 1315 Valley Drive (1), 861 Valley Drive (1), and 710 Pier Avenue (2), for which the City currently receives commission, the owner/occupant of the property adjacent to the "at issue" private payphones is receiving the commission from the operation of the payphone. These owner/occupants also provide the necessary electrical support required to operate the telephones. Since provision of an electrical supply could represent a significant cost factor, Staff has requested that GTE, at their cost, establish the electrical connection from the most feasible City source. They have investigated this request, and are reviewing the engineering report to identify and explore the possibilities should the City desire to maintain some or all of the private payphones. They have. agreed to share in the cost of obtaining an electrical supply to those payphones relocated to the P.R.O.W. Tapping into an electrical source, common to the City, is a potentially burdensome and costly task, one that the private payphone owner should undertake, as a condition of use. It is estimated that to establish an electrical supply from a City source, could cost as much as $1500 per location. Each location needs an electrical meter, conduit, and possible trenching and replacement of sidewalk and/or walk -way. The owners of the private payphones will be given thirty (30) days within which to comply with Council direction, and supply the revenue records for each "at issue" payphone. Staff will then determine by usage, if a particular payphone is providing a public service, and should be retained. It is incumbent upon the vendor/owner of the private payphones, to remove any instrument from the P.R.O.W., and cause the condition of the affected area, to be restored to specifications of the Public Works Director, in accordance with the original condition of the P.R.O.W., prior to the installation of the obstruction. It is hoped, that via contact by GTE and the other payphone companies, the owner/occupant adjacent to the private payphones will cause the payphones to be more appropriately located, off the P.R.O.W, thereby still providing a public service. Although removal to private property will not provide a source of revenue for the City, it will not create additional labor and expense to establish the electrical supply necessary to operate the payphones. Alternatives: 1. Direct Staff to prepare an Ordinance for adoption to establish a permit and fee procedure, for payment of a set fee or percentage of the gross revenue to the City. 2. Require relocation to private property, of all the "at issue" payphones. 3. Address only those phones whose percentage is 50% or more. CONCUR: Cyfthia A. Wilson, Director General Services Department evin B. Northc aft, City Manager Tony Antich, Director of Public Works Respectfully submitted, Cynthia A. Wilson, Director by h Michele D. Tercero, Telecommunications Staff Liaison NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Copeland, r Viki p , Direc o Finance Department NOTED: / v.tie /9( - Bill Grove, L" Director of Building & Safety i BACKGROUND MATERIAL 11 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM DATE: July 9, 1990 TO: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works FROM: Gary Wheaton, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Telephones in Public Right of Way Revenue Received Location Type Number by City Fishing Pier: 1. 1 Pier Ave. Pedestal 374-9055 Yes 2. n n n 374-9513 3. if n n 374-9554 II 4. n n n 374-9106 ,r 5. n n n 374-9212 ", 6. " " 1 374-9518 n Pier's Market: 7. 50 8. 11 n n 11 It Robert's Liquor: 9. 74 Cafe 50's: 10. 140. 11. f1 n 11 n Simpson's Market: 12. 302 13. 14. n Owner GTE n 11 It n 41A. Ca0..Ury 15:f 3 r Pedestal 379-8832 No Private ' ',•: 376-4651 Pedestal, 318-9258 Booth 374-9369 n n Booth II 11 II II 11 n 376-4651 374-9221 374-9598 374-9289 11 No n Private GTE /C) GTE GTE 11 n Location Coin Laundry: 15. 509 Pier Ave. City Hall:. 16. 540 It 17. Community Center: 18. 710 19. It u u Mickey's Deli Revenue . Received Type Number by City Pedestal 374-9543 No Wall 374-9478 n n 374-9126 374-9195 20. 101 Hermosa Ave. Pedestal 318-1851 21. n n n n Uncle Stauro's Cafe: 22. 201 n Fat Face Fenners: 23. 837 24. It n II 11 n 11 El Gringo Mexican Restaurant: 25. 2620 26. n It n Laundry & Cleaners: 27. 243 'PCH Hermosa Fitness: 28. 339 PCH 7 --EI ev'err:- 372-5472 372-7725 374-9346 374-9328 Pedestal 376-5832 n n n 376-5832 374-9316 374-9109 3-a u Owner Private o GTE P=' ,f,}: ! " rts%'i Private n n n It n GTE 1t 147)- /d A It Private Revenue Received Location Type Number by City Owner Italian Restaurant: )'4 d V "/_•�l� cif/-1,cr P.: 31 -502- PCH" _Pedestal. ,-- -No- Private -- Hank's Pizza: 32. 1030 Avation Bl. it 376-9529 II n / ° /0 Bocatto's Market: 33. 3127 Manhattan Ave. Wall ? II It OD !, Le Master's Grocery: 34. 635 Monterey Bl. Pedestal 374-9019 ". GTE /007:' '1 35. Goodstuff Cafe: 36. 1286 Strand cc: ty/gw Kevin Northcraft Mike Schubach Steve Wisniewski William Grove Viki Copeland Leroy Staten 372-9242 374-9558 n n /Oc ` 4M 10446. ... . t ;f :. °'"�' 'L � `��°�r� • .ice .�;�� 4A4- 1,ildrAN t4u.sti- . OJt WI /Y' t, 1r Q O 4Z3 Z;5t • tI VC 141 0 i:ftkbu • 'z'skic, 4.0 fts et. a ttie 61 D • 260 tiSRitiosm iwF Gg/wGePol ¢ti AM R�S7/9 a/R4W7 ttsf • 339 P.C.H. HEPtia A 83 7 141ZRMo6/4 An F'AT FACS F/A/AlegS _ 2113 E c. H. 4. vN 17g y GL Ei NER S /Z86 STRANp 635 btoiYrEpS'y dehtila Lc- rims: pie &Rack -Ai Copy CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LISTING OF PUBLIC PAYPHONES ON CITY PROPERTY (12 PHONES) 1 PIER AVENUE (6) 1315 VALLEY DRIVE (1) 710 PIER AVENUE (2) 861 VALLEY DRIVE (1) 454 GOULD (VALLEY PARK) (1) 1035 VALLEY DRIVE (1) (213) 374-9513 374-9212 374-9055 374-9106 .374-9554 374-9518 (213) 374-9478 (213) 374-9195 374-9243 (213)374-9131 (213) ? (NEW INSTALL in process) (213) ? (SCHEDULED NEW INSTALL) All public/semi-public payphones are to be included under the same contract and terms. Authorized signature Cynthia A. Wilson Name. General Services Director Title February 26, 1991 Date Authorized Contact persons: Michele D. Tercero, Telecommunications Liaison OR Cynthia A. Wilson, General Services Director § J-3 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS § 29-4 matters, which deposit shall be applied towards the cost and the balance, if any, refunded to the applicant. (c) That the applicant for such permit shall agree to re- imburse the city for the actual cost of restoring the area covered by such excavation or curb alteration to a condition satisfactory to the superintendent of streets as above set forth, and to hold the city harmless against any claim for damages of any nature . growing out of such excavation or curb alteration. (Ord. No. 86 N. S., § 1.) Sec. 29-3. Cash deposit in lieu of bond. In lieu of making deposits as required in section 29-2, any person desiring to make a number of curb alterations or excavations in streets, alleys or public places within one year, •may make "a cash deposit of an amount, which, in the judg- ment of the superintendent of streets, will be sufficient to cover the excavations or curb alterations which such appli- cant may desire to make within a given period; provided, that in the case of excavations or curb alterations by public utility companies operating under franchises or under the jurisdiction of the public utilities commission, permit may be granted without such deposits, but in such cases the city shall bill such companies for the actual cost to the city of restoring the area covered by such excavations or curb altera- tions to a condition satisfactory to the superintendent of streets. (Ord. No. 86 N. S., § 2.), Sec. 29-4. Inspection and approval of work; restoration by city at permiitee's expense. Nothing herein shall prohibit any person from doing all or any part of the work called for in the permit; provided, that all such excavations or curb alterations shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the superintendent of streets, and if the area covered thereby is not restored to a condition satisfactory to the superintendent of streets, he shall at the expense of the permittee proceed to do such work as may be 339 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Michele Tercero, General Services Department FROM: Mary Fehskens, Business License Inspector RE: Encroachment on the public right of way DATE: January 29, 1991 As per our discussion regarding private utility companies encroaching on the public right of way, they will require the following items: 1. A business license costing approximately $50. to $100. 2. Electrical permit ranging from approximately $30. to $50. for each location (you may want to verify the exact fee with the Building Department. 3. Most importantly, and prior to any of the above being issued, we require proof of an encroachment permit from the public works department. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me on extension 206. March 26, 1991 DEAR MERCHANT; DRAFT It has come to our attention, that the owner(s) of the public payphone located at this address, will be notifying you of their intention to either relocate or remove the public payphone at this location. The City has investigated the placement of this public payphone, and determined that it is either partially or fully on the Public -right-of-way. The City agrees with the owners of these public payphones, that the public payphones should either be placed fully on the public -right-of-way, or fully on the private property. Questions regarding the relocation or removal of these public payphones, should be addressed to the owner of the payphone in question. If you are the owner of the public payphone, or if you have any questions regarding the public -right -of way, please contact the Hermosa Beach Public Works Department, (213) 318-0214. Thank you. Your cooperation and assistance are greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Michele D. Tercero, Telecommunications Staff Liaison MDT/ (mt) Mar. 19 '91 15:24 0000: BAY CITIES FRC March 18, 1991 City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Michelle Tercero Re: GTE Public Telephones Dear Michelle, TEL213-477-7091 PAGE 01 Thank you for your letter of March 12, 1991 and for bringing this matter to our attention. We have forwarded your letter to our attorneys for their review and advise. Their findings will be submitted to me and subsequently reviewed with you and your staff when available. In the interim, a copy of your engineering technician's report will be greatly appreciated. This report is required in order to assist our legal staff in establishing their conclusions. In advance, we also thank you for advising us of the City Council's conclusion and recommendations scheduled for March 26, 1991. We are certain that the City Council's recommendations will greatly assist us in determining the most beneficial location for GTE public telephone services within your city. Sincerely CORA PAD ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE, - GTE CA, INC 1800 752-8555 X 6439 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council y April 1, 1991 Regular Meeting of April 9, 1991 SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 90-25 LOCATION 825 PACIFIC COAST "HIGHWAY, HABASH AUTO DETAILING, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 1, AND LOTS 3, 5, & 7, BLOCK B, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. APPELLANTS: COUNCILMEMBERS MIDSTOKKE AND ESSERTIER APPLICANT: NAOUM & JAY HABASH HABASH AUTO DETAILING 683 FIFTH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 PURPOSE: TO RECONSIDER THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF THE OPERATION OF AN AUTO DETAILING BUSINESS IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING AUTO SALES BUSINESS Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the requested Conditional Use Permit based on insufficient parking and overall space for the combination of the proposed auto sales lot and detailing business on one small lot. ALTERNATIVE: Sustain the Planning Commission approval of a Master CUP for the the combination of the auto sales and auto detailing businesses, subject to the conditions in the P.C. resolution. Background At their meeting of March 5, 1991, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to approve a master conditional use permit to allow an auto detailing shop in conjunction with the existing auto sales operation, subject to several conditions as contained in P.C. Resolution 90-100. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for further background. Analysis Please refer to the attached staff reports prepared for the Planning Commission for the analysis. Since the. Planning Commission meeting, staff has noticed that some of the parking spaces identified on the submitted plans are currently occupied by a boat being stored on the property. The landlord has indicated that this boat will be removed and that the lot will be restriped consistent with the plan. Also, it was noticed that the interior wall previously being constructed without any building permits has been removed as required by the Building Department. Staff, however, still does not believe the site can support these two distinct businesses because the size of the site is inadequate, and will result in a shortage of customer and employee parking. Further, staff doubts that compliance with condition #11, which requires that detailed cars be picked up and delivered to customer locations, will occur. With the existing signs, and from watching the auto detailing operation, it is clear that the intention is to operate a full service detail business including all drive-by customers. As such, customer vehicles may ultimately be parked in the. adjacent neighborhood. A letter of opposition indicates that thissituation is already occurring (see attached letter). Alternative Sustaining the Planning Commission's approval would authorize the continued operation of the businesses subject to several conditions of approval. To achieve compliance with these conditions will likely require .constant monitoring and enforcement by the City. K -n 'obert on Associate Planner Michael Sc u1ach`-� Planning Director City Manager Attachments 1. Site Map 2. Proposed Resolution of Denial 3. Alternative Resolution of Approval 4. P.C. Resolution 5. P.C. supplemental / plan 6. P.C. Staff Reports 7. P.C. Minutes 8. Staff Review Minutes 10/18/90 9. Correspondence 10. Photos CITY MANAGER COMMENT: Past problems are not necessarily absolute predictors of future concerns, and enforce- ment requirements alone are not sufficient grounds for denial of the application. Unfor- tunately, the City's long history of auto related businesses on PCH clearly demonstrate that parking and traffic intrusions into residen- tial areas are probable. There is inadequate miti- gation possible at this location to have any con- fidence these common problems would be avoid- ed. Our objective is to decrease existing resi- dential/commercial con- flicts; this permit like- ly would aggravate them. Denial is recommended. .30 w 0 0 cc .30 8TH 1 CO • .0I IPLACE, /0 �-I `l �3a �3 X38 33-5 1..2,/,' 38.8/ b 3/ n33 f 38.59 t2Wto /0i 26.6/ 1 Z9 131 I ,• /0,266/ 2/.Sol/S// {@®®®®®®®®® 219 I v. _lSa , 33 27 .., 25 •• 23 .� . 21 BLK. v 19 ,• 17 B 15 13 - 11 •• 9 7 f , Rs!•scmn»rccu:a§^ *"" 5 33 00 3 , c 0 POS �. - 'i b ® La 34 35.38 36-6/ 0 ` 32 366/. 36.6/ 2$ 30 36.6/ 27 28 33 25 26 .. 23 24 .. 2/ 22 .. /9 20 ., /7 18 .• /S 16 /3 14 .. /! 12 .. O 10 O 8 O (n M 6(<3zsm4 33. , 3 7cmfi .3O .. N N. 6 hZ) Cr! 265 �, , 4j. 34M N 'E_ PoR 22 y oh. 23 ,g tool. V (;C/ 8TH (0"1 Pl. 67.2 VII (,- (ail I -I5 i56e3g -7.35- -TC ST. a 32 O � REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT M. B. 7 -151 6 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO DENY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, ON RECONSIDERATION, FOR AN AUTO DETAILING SHOP IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN AUTO SALES ESTABLISMENT FOR 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 1, AND LOTS 3, 5 & 7,.BLOCK B, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT.. WHEREAS, the City Council held' a public hearing on April 9, 1991, to receive oral and written testimony regarding the reconsideration of the Planning Commission decision to grant a Conditional Use Permit at 825 Pacific Coast Highway to add an auto detailing shop and made the following findings: A. The applicant, Habash Auto Detailing, is proposing to open a new business to the rear of a used auto sales lot for the purpose of operating an auto detailing business; B. Although the site is zoned C-3, the buildings and the site are inadequate in size to provide sufficient parking and work space to support the two proposed business activities; C. The proposed combination of uses as proposed is not compatible with adjacent residential properties; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby deny a Master Conditional Use Permit to allow an auto detailing shop in conjunction with an auto sales business at 825 Pacific Coast Highway. PASSED, APPROVED, andADOPTED this day of 1991. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY ; A/pers825d 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION '91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AN AUTO DETAILING SHOP IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN AUTO SALES BUSINESS, AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 1, AND LOTS 3, 5 & 7, BLOCK B, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 1991, to receive oral and written testimony regarding a reconsideration of the Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit at 825 Pacific Coast Highway to add an auto detailing shop and made the following findings: A. The applicant, Habash Auto Detailing, is proposing to open a new business to the rear of a used auto sales lot for the purpose of operating an auto detailing business; B. The site is zoned C-3 and the building and the site are adequate in size, and provide sufficient parking, to support the proposed business activity; C. The development, as conditioned, poses no threat to the public safety and welfare; D. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding commercial activities along Pacific Coast Highway and the imposition of conditions as required by this resolution will mitigate any environmental or negative impacts on nearby commercial and residential properties; E. The development is consistent with the General Commercial General Plan designation; NOW, THEREFORE, the. City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Master 'Conditional Use Permit to allow auto sales and an auto detailing shop at 825 3 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pacific Coast Highway subject to the conditions as contained in P.C. Resolution 90-100. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day , 1991. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: A/pers825 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 84 cKcR avND M,9 TERM L 1 3 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P. C. 90-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AUTO SALES AND AN AUTO DETAILING SHOP AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY,-; LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 1, AND LOTS 3, 5 & 7, BLOCK B, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on December 4, 1990, and January 2, February 5, and March 5, 1991, to receive oral and written testimony regarding an application for a Conditional Use Permit' at 825 Pacific Coast Highway to add an auto detailing shop and made the following findings: A. The applicant, Habash Auto Detailing, is proposing to open a new business to the rear of.a used auto sales lot for the purpose of operating an auto detailing business; B. The site is zoned C-3 and the building and the site are adequate in size, and provide sufficient parking, to support the proposed business activity; C. The development, as conditioned, poses no threat- to the public safety and welfare; D. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding commercial activities along Pacific Coast Highway and the imposition of conditions as required by this resolution will mitigate any environmental or negative impacts on nearby commercial and residential properties; E. The development is consistent with the General Commercial General Plan designation; NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby approve a Master Conditional Use Permit to allow auto sales and an auto detailing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 shop at 825 Pacific Coast Highway subject to the following conditions: 1. The location of structures and features on the property shall be in substantial conformance with submitted plans as submitted on February 27, 1991,; any modification shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. 2. A maximum of three service bays shall be provided for the detailing business, and only inside washing and detailing of autos is allowed. Outside work activity is strictly prohibited. Any violation of this condition will subject the business to a citation and/or revocation of the C.U.P. 3. The use of the property and the service bays shall be limited to auto sales and auto detailing, auto repair is prohibited. 4. Landscaping shall be provided as shown on the submitted landscape plan, and shall be implemented on the site. 5. The six foot high wooden fence along the westerly property line abutting the residential property to the west shall be maintained in satisfactory condition. 6. Pursuant to the recorded covenant, lots 1, 3, 5, and 7, Block B, of the Redondo Hermosa tract, which comprise the subject property shall be considered as one single parcel. 7. The drain / grease trap on the south side of the shall be maintained in operating condition. 8. The trash dumpster shall be provided in a location and approved by the Planning Director. property reviewed 9. The public right-of-way shall not be used for the parking or storing of vehicles that are intended for servicing or cleaning. 10. Test driving of vehicles on local residential'streets shall be prohibited. 11. Because of the lack of customer parking, the auto detailing business shall be conducted such that customer vehicles are picked up from the customer's location and delivered back to the customer; a maximum of three (3) vehicles shall be on the premises at one time for detailing. 12. Al]. outdoor vehicle storage, parking and driveway areas shall be maintained free of unregistered and derelict vehicles, wrecked vehicles, or parts and debris. 13. Storage of trucks, tractors, trailers, and RVs in the parking areas or any other location on the premises shall be prohibited. 2 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 14. Adequate on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the employees. Usage of residential streets and Pacific Coast Highway for parking employee automobiles is prohibited. 15. The use of parking spaces for displaying new or used automobiles for sale or for any auto merchandise shall be strictly prohibited. 16. The hours of operation for the auto detailing business shall be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday thru Saturday. 17. Noise emanating from the property shall be within the limitations prescribed by the City's noise ordinance, Article 19.5 of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, and shall not create a nuisance to the surrounding residential neighborhood and commercial establishments. Creating loud or obnoxious noise shall be prohibited. a) The small air compressor used for dislodging items from dashboards etc. shall be the only use of any air compressor equipment. 18. Examining, installing, or repairing car alarm systems shall be prohibited. 19. There shall be no outdoor bells or buzzers or similar apparatus. Outside speakers for paging or any other purposes shall be prohibited. 20. The exterior of the premises including the parking areas shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. 21. All exterior lights shall be located and oriented in a manner to insure that neighboring residential property and public right-of-way shall not be adversely affected. 22. Disposal of hazardous waste material shall in accordance with local, state, and federallaws, but in no event shall such waste material be allowed to drain into the City storm drain system. 24. Prior to the Conditional Use Permit being in effect, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, a signed and notarized,"Acceptance of Conditions" form. 25. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the deed, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 26. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. • 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C 27. The front gate to the front auto sales lot at 825 Pacific Coast Highway shall remain opened at all times while this business is open as well as the west second entry gate, 28. There shall be a review of this Conditional Use Permit in 3 months from the date of the approval of this resolution. 29. The applicant``` shall provide continuing evidence of the availability of parking for the detailing business in spaces identified as numbers 2, 3, and 4 on the submitted plan; otherwise, the C.U.P. for the auto detailing business shall be terminated. 29. This resolution supersedes Resolution P.C. 86-5. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Marks,Peirce,Rue,Chmn.Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 90-100 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of March 5, 1991 /! ,,f 1.,:.�a.�.:.. 1� % . %� r tet! r... -.-'/'\---_' Christine Ketz, Chairperson Michael Schubach, Secretary I'1 rL., P-321 tell /`t')/ Date -10 A/pers825 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission FROM: Michael Schubach, Planning Director SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Request - 825 P.C.H. DATE: February 28, 1991 The attached revised plan, as requested by the Planning Commission at the February 5 meeting, was the reason for continuance of this request to the March 5 date. Staff did not receive this plan until the evening of February 27. The purpose of this revision was to prepare accurate and scaled drawings to determine if adequate parking could be provided on the site to support two separate and unconnected businesses: auto sales, and auto detailing. This revised plan is indeed an improvement over the previously s-ubmitted plan, and does show that that more room is available than was shown on the previous plan. It shows that ten parking spaces can be provided by reconfiguring the stalls place seven in a head -in direction to the south along the southerly property line. The code required parking for the combination of these two uses, which is nine (9). Although this layout seems feasible it creates some other problems. For example, space #1 will block access to a door to a storage room, and requirethe removal of fence which currently extends to the south from the bathroom. Further, although it satisfies parking requirements, it is questionable whether it is adequate for these two rather intense uses of the site. This plan does not change staff's position in regards to the application, especially since the applicant has demonstrated his intention to detail cars outside, and to operate a full service detail business for all drive-by customers. If the Planning Commission finds merit in this proposal because of this revised plan, staff has still included an alternative resolution of approval. The Commission will also have to determine if condition #11, which requires pick-up and delivery of customer vehicles is applicable. SUPPLEMENTAL.... INFORMATION est or S t D WALK 6" PL 41 LL STA S i DEWA rC 1 T&D Aviro S' CAR SAy_S OF I AvTO S!}i PA?' 1 L a kti 91-6" N 0 a 4 1r7 4--1 oP f ALJK X- at. — T KTI-I OPt :Ll .26-1 ' eulAc:AftA-5 otk.-.--;-;-.P `6/14,1,11. TV!,404aiLiAt, j AA. 3 1 x"79 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 25, 1991 Regular Meeting of March 5, 1991 (CONTINUED FROM THE DECEMBER 4, 1990, AND JANUARY 2 AND FEBRUARY 5, 1991 MEETINGS) SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 90-25 LOCATION: 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HABASH AUTO DETAILING, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 1, AND LOTS 3, 5, & 7, BLOCK B, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. APPLICANT: NAOUM & JAY HABASH HABASH AUTO DETAILING 683 FIFTH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO, ALLOW THE OPERATION OF AN AUTO DETAILING BUSINESS IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING AUTO SALES BUSINESS Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the requested Conditional Use Permit based on insufficient parking for the combination of the proposed auto sales lot and detailing business. ALTERNATIVE: Approve a Master CUP for the the combination of the auto sales and auto detailing businesses. Background At the December 4, 1990 meeting the Planning Commission continued this request for consideration of a master C.U.P. for the property in question and, also, because neither the applicant nor the landowner were. present at the hearing. At the January 2, 1991 meeting, the Commission initially voted to deny the request in the applicant's absence. However, when the applicant appeared later in the evening the hearing was reopened and the Commission decided to continue the hearing. At the February 5, 1991 meeting the Commission again continued this request because of concern that the submitted drawings were not accurate or to scale to determine if perhaps space for parking could be found. The applicant indicated he would have accurate drawings prepared for the next meeting. For further background, please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for December 4, 1990. Analysis Pursuant to the attached staff report from December 4, staff does not believe the site can support these two distinct businesses because of the lack of customer and employee parking. At this time, the applicant has not submitted any revised drawings to address the concerns expressed at the last meeting, and has failed to demonstrate ability to provide adequate parking for two businesses on this lot. In regards to the current operation of the business the applicant has only demonstrated failure to comply with zoning requirements, the municipal code, and proposed conditions..'` Further, it is clear that the operation of the business requires the use of the street to park customer and employee vehicles. For example,both the Code Enforcement Officer and Business License Inspector have witnessed washing of vehicles outside (see current photos) on numerous occassions; it appears to be a daily routine. Further, the Department of Building and Safety has placed a "red tag" on interior framing for a wall begun without permits, which has not be answered with a permit or removal. Additionally, the Building Department has recently cited the business for erecting signs without sign permits, and for operating • without a business license. More importantly, the purpose of the signs is obviously for attracting drive-by business which is completely contrary to the applicants stated intentions, as reflected in the proposed conditions of approval, to detail only those vehicles picked up from dealerships. In sum, the applicant has already demonstrated the business and its mode of operation on this constrained site, and has shown the severity of impacts it will have on the surroundings in terms of street parking, outdoor work activities, and overall appearance. In effect, the Planning Commission does not have to base its decision on anticipated consequences, but on its judgement of the business as it is currently being iblegal y o, era ed. /914 0. . /tom .o eri Rob r s'on Michael Schuliach Planning Director 1. Site Map, Current Photos 2. Proposed Resolution of Denial 3. Alternative Resolution approving a Master C.U.P. 4. P.C. Staff Reports 5. P.C. Minutes 6. Staff Review Minutes 10/18/90 7. More Photographs Associate Planner a/pcsr825 ADDENDUM Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PURPOSE: January 31, 1991 Regular Meeting of February 5, 1991 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 90-25 ADDENDUM 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY NAOUM & JAY HABASH HABASH AUTO DETAILING 825 PACIFIC COAST'HIGHWAY HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING HABASH AUTO DETAILING AT 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Recommendation SEE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FROM 12/26/90, a resolution of denial is attached to this addendum, as well as a modified resolution of approval. Background Since the first of the year, 1991, the undersigned has made several spot checks of the Habash Detailing Shop. On more than three occasions I noted two or more vehicles being worked on outside in the driveway area in front of the two bays alloted to Mr Habash for cleaning. This is clearly in violation of• -proposed Condition # 2,"work outside the bays is strictly prohibited'" On, 1/30/91, the Building Department made an inspection and discovered an illegal wall being built inside one of the bays without permit or plans previously approved by either the Building and/or Planning Directors. The wall has been "red tagged" by the Building Department. On 1/31/91, the Planning Department received a hand delivered letter of complaint from two nearby residents. The substance of the complaint is that Habash Detailing has been: a)washing cars outside, b) dumping alleged illegal substances into the gutters, c) causing major parking problems with the vehicles they clean often found parked on the street in the residential area. They also detailed at length employees from the Auto Detailing Shop racing up and down their residential street with vehicles that are to be cleaned. (See attached letter.) Analysis It would appear that Habash Detailing has knowingly ignored most of the dictates of the Planning Commission and has alienated some of the neighbors. Both Planning Staff & Building Staff have`, observed the working outside violations. It seems clear that the business is not operating as proposed. The combined violations of city zoning ordinances, proposed Conditional Use Permit, and parking problems caused by this business leave serious doubts that this business won't negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood which is already impacted. It should be noted that one of the City Council's goals is to reduce commercial/residential conflict, and staff believes approval of this C.U.P. would therefore be counter-productive. CONC R: Respectfully submitte is aei Schubach Planning Director Attachments Frank McPherson Code -Enforcement Officer 1. Proposed Resolution of Denial 2. Alternative Master Resolution of approval p/cup14 December 26, 1990 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission February 5, 1991 (CONTINUED FROM THE DECEMBER 4i 1990 & JANUARY 2, 1991 MEETINGS) SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 90-25 LOCATION: 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HABASH AUTO DETAILING, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 1, AND LOTS 3, 5, & 7, BLOCK B, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. APPLICANT: NAOUM & JAY HABASH HABASH AUTO DETAILING 683 FIFTH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF AN AUTO DETAILING BUSINESS IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING AUTO SALES BUSINESS Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the requested Conditional Use Permit based on insufficient parking for the combination of the proposed auto sales lot and detailing business. ALTERNATIVE: Approve a Master CUP for the the combination of the auto sales and auto detailing businesses. Background At the December 4, 1990 meeting the Planning Commission continued this request for consideration of a master C.U.P. for the property in question and, also, because neither the applicant nor the landowner were present at the hearing. For further background, please refer to the. attached Planning Commission staff report for December 4, 1990. Analysis Pursuant to the attached staff report from December 4, staff does not believe the site can support these two distinct businesses because of the lack of customer and employee parking. However, if the Planning Commission is comfortable in making a finding, in consideration of the detailing businesses proposed mode of operation to pick-up and deliver all customer vehicles, that the auto bays should count towards the parking requirement, then the adoption of the attached master C.U.P. resolution may be appropriate. /7 The attached master resolution incorporates all conditions from the existing C.U.P. for auto sales, and suggested additional conditions for mitigating the impacts from the proposed auto detailing business. / ,, /7 7 Michael Schubach ('n(( Robertson Associate Planner Planning Director 1. Proposed Resolution 2. P.C. Staff Report 12/4/90 3. P.C. Minutes 12/4/90 4. Staff Review Minutes 10/18/90 5. Site Map 6. Photographs 7. Copy of Resolution P.C. 86-5 (existing reso. 8-. Application 9. P.C. minutes of 1/2/91 10. Affidavit ) 8 November 28, 1990 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission December 4, 1990 SUBJECT:. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP 90-25 LOCATION: 825 1/2 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, HABASH AUTO DETAILING, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 1, AND LOTS 3, 5, & 7, BLOCK B, REDONDO HERMOSA TRACT. APPLICANT: NAOUM & JAY HABASH HABASH AUTO DETAILING 683 FIFTH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF AN AUTO DETAILING BUSINESS Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the requested Conditional Use Permit based on insufficient parking for the combination of the proposed auto sales lot and detailing business. ALTERNATIVE: Continue Planning Commission hearing to January 2, 1991 and require a Master CUP for the auto sales and auto detailing ( since there are conditions that will need modification in the auto sales CUP.) Background PROJECT INFORMATION: Zoning: General Plan: Lot Size: Building Size: Current Use: Proposed Parking Spaces Parking Spaces for existing Auto Sales Lot: C-3 General Commercial 9200 sq. ft. approx. and (3534 sq ft. for auto detailing use.) 800 Square Feet Combination of Auto Sales lot & proposed New Auto Detailing Shop Three (In the service bays) Six The Habash Auto Detailing is located on the southwest corner of Pacific Coast Highway at Eighth Place. It is set back in the west third of the lot which has a used car dealership in front. The -//- combined lot is approximately 9200 square feet. The hours of operation listed are 8:30 am to 6pm, Monday through Saturday, with the sole purpose of auto detailing. The Habash Detailing business started operation without a business license, or CUP. They were warned on many occasions to cease and desist until the proper waiting period for a business license and CUP but continued to operate. Especially noted was the OUTSIDE VEHICLE washing which goes on daily after repeated warnings by various city hall personnel. Analysis: This property is presently an authorized business, for used auto sales, "All American Car Sales". A CUP, (Resolution 86-5) dated January 7, 1986 was approved to allow the expansion of an auto sales business to add the garages in the rear to replace a nonconforming residential use. Condition L6 of the CUP states" The proposed garages shall be used only in conjunction with the automobile sales business unless adequate parking is provided for their use as a separate business. The determination of parking requirements shall be made by the Planning Director." This condition precludes a separate business on property unless adequate parking is provided for all uses. The parking requirement for the entire lot, when used as one business, is nine spaces (based on one space per 1,000 square feet of land area for an auto dealership.) With the proposed separation of uses the parking requirement is six spaces for the auto sales business and three for the proposed detail business (based on one per 250 square feet of building area.) With the subject proposal, the applicant intends to use his garage "bay" area to park (3) vehicles. Although that is sufficient to hold three vehicles it is not sufficient to "work" on three vehicles at one time. Thus the driveway is constantly clogged due to the lack of any additional parking. An additional space is proposed by using one of the six existing spaces from the auto sales lot. The proposed parking in the driveway area behind the garage is not acceptable since the area is inadequate for a turning area. At their meeting of October 18, 1990 the Staff Environmental Review Committee recommended a mitigated Environmental Negative Declaration. Recommended were the following mitigating measures 1) The wash water & liquids not to be drained off-site or in the storm drains; 2) No pinstriping or body mouldings; 3) No alarms or buzzers on site; 4) No auto repair or large compressors; 5) Employee parking to be provided on site; 6) Hours of operation limited to 8am to 6pm Monday thru Saturday;7) All signs must have prior approval before installation; 8) Trash dumpster must be fully enclosed on private. property. The requested C.U.P. would authorize the operation of an auto detailing business. The applicant indicates that the operation consists of the pick up of autos, and would not involve drive -up customers. Whether or not parking is determined to be adequate hinges on approval of the garage bays as required parking. Staff's concerns are as follows: a)The owner indicates the business is basically auto pick up with almost no walk up trade. Because of the shortage of parking, auto pick up should be the only manner of operation. b)In the past the washing of vehicles & occasional detailing has occurred outside in the driveway area. This should be absolutely forbidden. c)The drain/grease trap on the south side of the property where all liquids flow too must be maintained and cleaned properly d)An appropriate location for the trash dumpster`needs to be determined. e)There is a small compressor used to blow lodged items from dash boards etc. This should, be the only authorized use of. that equipment. On the proposed "Plot Plan dated 8-30-90, a Stucco Wall is either being proposed or suggested. This would effectively cut the property up. Such a wall should not be allowed since it sections the property into two separate parcels for all intents and purposes. This business has been operating illegally for about sixty days. They continue to wash cars in the driveways after repeated warnings by Planning and Building personnel. The following items as listed are some recommended conditions if a Master CUP is recommended. a)No auto repairs whatsoever b)No alarm installation or testing, or installations of any sort c)No outside phone buzzers, bells, etc. d)No pinstriping or body moldings shall be conducted e)Hours limitations shall be Monday thru Saturday 8am to 6pm. f)No outside work activities whatsoever. It is staffs feeling that if Mr Habash is to have his business as designated he must adhere to the recommended conditions. In summation, the garages on the rear of the property were approved as an expansion to a used car lot, to be used in conjunction there with as stated in CUP #86-5. It does not seem appropriate to separate these garages out for use as a separate business. Fra k McPherson Code Enforcement Officer CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director 1. Staff Review Minutes 10/18/90 2. Site Map 3. Application 4. Photographs 5. Copy of Resolution P.C. 86-5 previous existing resp, 6. Public Notice Affidavit r at reasonable conditions can be imposed which would mitigate adverse impacts created b the business. Mr. : - continued by discussing past correspondence between his office that the applica ' . He stated at alcohol-related conditions are preempted by State law, and he noted at no conditio • in the CUP regulate the actual use of alcohol; rather, the conditions as : ress the environme . al issues raised by such use, not the actual sale of alcohol. Mr. Lee state • hat the City is on good legalfoundation in terms of moving fo • and with this conditional use . ermit. He stated that, if so desired by the Commission is office would prepare additiona aterial on this request. Mr. Lee, in response ' a question from Chmn. Ketz, explained what w. Id happen if the CUP were approved, and the :.plicant did not agree to the conditions. Comm. Rue suggested that . e matter be continued so that the ap the issues. Public Hearing closed at 7:34 P. by Chmn. Ketz. Comm. Rue encouraged the applican to come to an agre = ent with the City and try to come to an understanding of the conditional ► e permit proceess. He felt that it is important for the applicant to understand the City's posi on on this mfter. scant and stall' can discuss Comm. Peirce felt that the only condition at ue„is that relating to the trash enclosure. He did not feel it would be appropriate to have the City Attorney spend a lot of time and money preparing more information. He stated that llaw are laws and should be complied with. Comm. Rue noted, however, that it is important for e applicant to understand the procedures. He felt it is worth an effort to reach such/Understand • g to avert potential legal problems in the future. Comm. Peirce stated that he wouldfagree to a one-month d - . y; however, he stressed that he did not want the City Attorney to p lid money on further work. Comm. Marks stated that the only physical problem relate to the trash enclosure. He suggested, therefore, that t e applicant meet with staff to resolve t • at problem. Chmn. Ketz agreed thshe would like to see the applicant and st this problem. come to a resolution on MOTION by Co . Rue, seconded by Comm. Marks, to continue this ite ,s to the meeting of April 2, 1991, s. that the applicant and staff can discuss these issues in an a empt to reach an agreement. AYES: Comms. Marks, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABST'd N: None ABS - NT: None CUP 90-25 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTO DETAILING AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. HABASH AUTO DETAILING (CONTINUED FROM MEETINGS OF 12/4/90. 1/2/91. AND 2/5/91) Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated February 25, 1991, and recommended denial of the requested CUP based on insufficient parking for the combination of the proposed auto sales lot and detailing business. i P.C. Minutes 3/5/91 Mr. Schubach suggested an alternative, to approve a master CUP for the combination of the auto sales and auto detailing business. Mr. Schubach explained that the applicant has now submitted a new plan with a scale drawing which shows that the parking has been realigned to the south property line. He pointed out the changes on the plan,and noted that the applicant asserts that there is now adequate parking. Mr. Schubach stated that staff has discovered on several occasions that cars arebeing washed in the area designated as a detailing area. It was also noted that an interior wall is -still in place which was not allowed. Staff felt that, overall, the site is too small for the proposed location. Staff also noted concern, over cars being washed outdoors and cars being parked in the area designated for work area. Staff had concerns over the general overall operation of this business, especially since there is another business at the location. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Comm. Peirce, stated that nine parking spaces are required for the two uses. There are seven outside, and two are within the rear of the building. He explained that the required parking has now been relocated to the south property line. Public Hearing opened at 7:46 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz. Jay Habash, 683 5th Street, Hermosa Beach, applicant, addressed the Commission and: (1) stated that he received a letter notifying him that the garage area cannot be blocked; (2) stated that the property owner has given him spaces 2, 3, and 4 for parking for the detail shdp; (3) stated that he has a 24 -month lease agreement for the three parking spaces; (4) passed out a copy of the lease agreement; (5) discussed the plans, explaining that cars are no longer being washed outdoors, only indoors, and no motor work at all is done on the premises. Mr. Habash continued and: (1) stated that there are no problems with this business and the other business on site; (2) noted that there is plenty of parking in the area; (3) stressed that he keeps no more than three cars on the lot at any one time; (4) explained that the cars block the way of no one; (5) stated that he has a letter from the surrounding neighbors who do not oppose this business, and he handed in the letter with the signatures. Mr. Habash went on and: (1) explained that when the owner comes in, he needs to have access to the garage; (2) said that he can park in that fourth space so long as the owner is not there getting into the garage; (3) stated, in response to a question from the City Attorney, that he has a 24 -month master lease with the property owner, and the master lease runs for the same length of time as the parking agreement; (4) said that he works on no more than three cars at any given time, and there are no more than three cars there at a time; (5) stated that he is in agreement with everything the City is asking him to do; (6) said that he began all car washing indoors one week ago; (7) stated that he uses no power equipment at all outdoors. Public Hearing closed at 7:53 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz. Comm. Peirce stated that the business now appears to be much smaller than was originally submitted. He felt that the business would be viable if only three cars are on-site at any given time. He noted that enforcement is important. He felt it would be appropriate to give the owner an opportunity to operate, and there can be a review in three months. Comm. Peirce noted concern that cars would be stored while other cars are being worked on. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Comm. Marks, explained that one parking space is required for each 1000 square feet of lot size. Chmn. Ketz referred to Condition No. 17(a): 'The small air compressor used for dislodging items from dashboards, etc., shall be the only use of any air compressor equipment." She C asked whether the applicant requested this, or whether it was a staff -recommended condition. Mr. Schubach explained that the condition was added after staff observed the operation of the business. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Chmn. Ketz, explained that there is not a condition requiring the doors to be closed during work because the doors face the highway, and staff did not feel noise would be a problem. Comm. Peirce referred to Condition No. 11: "Because of the lack of customer parking, the auto detailing business shall be conducted such that customer vehicles are picked up from the customer's location and delivered back to the customer, a maximum of three (3) vehicles shall be on premises at one time for detailing." He wanted to ensure that this condition is met. Mr. Lee suggested that the parking agreement be revised to specify the number of cars being committed to his use under the agreement He also suggested the addition of a condition requiring that the applicant provide continuing evidence of the availability of parking for his continued use; otherwise, there would be an automatic termination of the conditional use permit. Comm. Peirce wanted to prevent cars from blocking the front access. He also noted concern over the number of cars to be stored that are not being worked on. Mr. Habash stated that the provisions of his insurance do not allow him to store cars overnight. MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Rue, to approve P.C. 90-100, with the following amendments: (1) a condition shall be added requiring that the applicant provide continuing evidence of the availability of parking for his continued use; otherwise, there would be an automatic termination of the conditional use permit; (2) there shall be a three-month review of the business. AYES: Comms. Marks, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Chmn. Ketz stated that this decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed by writing to the City Council within ten days. CUP 9A-20/PARK 90-5 -- REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 1106 HERMU5A AVENUE Mr. Schubach gav staff report dated February 28, 1991, and reco mended that the Commission direct staff'l jursue enforcement of the CUP as necessazy and to strictly enforce the required improvement for'parking in the rear by June 3, 1991 On August 7, 1990, the Planning Commission approve conditional use permit and parking plan to allow a health and fitness facility w ie ht „tr ng) by adoption of Resolution 90-63. The Commission also requested a six-month revie The approval was subject to several conditions, most notably,. a requirement that the rear area along the alley be improved to provide five parking stalls by June 3, 1991; that the business provide validation for the p9bl1c parking lots; and that bicycle parking be provided inside the building. Staff inspected the site on February 28, 1991, and discussed the conditions with Mr,,.McColgan. The rear area adjacent to the alley has not been improved yet, but Mr. McColgan indicated that he is,aware of the requirement and is in the process of preparing plans to carry out the improvement by the June 3 deadline. P.C. Minutes 3/5/91 MO ON by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Chmn. Ketz, to approve staffs recommend Resolut .C. 91-14, with one modification: that Condition No. 3 be amen "Service of foo 'and beverage to customers in the outside dining areas shall on Sunday through ...day, and at 11:00 P.M. on Fridays, Saturda All customers shall be clear= . om the outside areas by no lat of food and beverage service." AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: o read: e at 10:00 P.M. d National Holidays. an 30 minutes after the end Comms. Marks, Peirce None None Co .• s. Aleks, Rue Chmn. K- _ ated that this decision of the Planning Commission may be app to - ity Council within ten days. writing CUP 90-25 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTO DETAILING AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. HABASH AUTO DETAILING (CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF JANUARY 2, 1991) Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated January 31. 1991. Staff recommended denial of the requested CUP based on insufficient parking for the combination of the proposed auto sales lot and detailing business. As an alternative, the Commission could approve a master CUP for the combination of the auto sales and auto detailing businesses. Since the first of the 1991, several spot checks have been made at this business. The code enforcement officer has noted on several occasions that two or more vehicles were being worked on outside in the driveway area in front of the two bays which are allotted to Mr. Habash for cleaning. This is clearly in violation of proposed Condition No. 2 which strictly prohibits work outside of the bays. On January 30, 1991, an inspector from the Building Department made an inspection and discovered an illegal wall being built inside one of the bays. No permit has been obtained, and the plans have not been approved by either the Building or Planning Departments. This wall has been "red tagged" by the Building Department. On January 31, 1991, the Planning Department received a hand -delivered letter of complaint from two nearby residents. The substance of the complaint is that Habash Detailing has been: washing cars outside; dumping alleged illegal substances into the gutters; and causing major parking problems with the vehicles being cleaned, since the vehicles are parking on the street in the residential neighborhood. The letter also detailed at length instances -of employees from the shop racing up and down their residential street in cars that are there to be cleaned. It would appear that Habash Detailing has knowingly ignored most of the dictates of the Planning Commission and has alienated some of the neighbors. Both planning and building staff have observed work taking place outdoors, in violation of the City requirements. It seems clear that the business is not operating as proposed. The combined violations of City zoning ordinances, the proposed CUP, and the parking. problems caused by this business leave serious concerns that this business will negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood, which is already impacted. It should be noted that one of the City Council's goals is to reduce commercial/residential conflict, and staff felt that approval of this CUP would therefore be counterproductive. Public Hearing opened at 7:50 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz. P.C. Minutes 2/5/91 Jay Habash, 683 5th Street, Hermosa Beach, applicant, addressed the Commission and: (1) discussed the parking, stating that there is ample parking on 8th Place; (2) stated that cars are not being washed outside at any time; (3) stressed that he is complying with all City -imposed requirements; (4) explained how the cars are picked up for detailing, noting that they are not parking on the public street; (5) noted that there are problems with littering caused by the Tender Box, and he cleans up the trash and washes down the sidewalk; (6) said that the cars are washed at the car wash, not on-site. Mr. Habashcontinued and (i) stated that at no time do his employees race up and down the streets; (2) said that he has had no driving accidents; (3) noted that he knows his neighbors, and they get along fine, and there are no problems or complaints; (4) explained that he intends to comply so that his insurance premium goes down, and he noted that his million -dollar policy is quite expensive; (5) said that no hazardous materials are being used; (6) noted that he is a long-term resident, and he is trying to have a successful business. Mr. Habash continued and: (1) discussed the free-standing partition which has been put up; (2) stated that cars are taken to the car wash arid brought back to be buffed; (3) was given copies of the photographs taken by the code enforcement officer, to which he explained that he had not seen them before. Mr. Habash and the Commissioners discussed the photos and plans and: (1) Mr. Habash explained that the photo of the "abandoned" auto is not on his space; (2) in response to a request from Comm. Marks, Mr. Habash outlined on the plans the exact location of his business; (3) discussed the wall, to which Mr. Habash explained that the wall .is in one of the bays; (4) Mr. Habash explained that his customers do not park at the site, noting that the cars are picked up for work from the dealerships and then returned by one of his employees. Mr. Habash went on and: (1) said that he has two employees; (2) stated that he and the employees, park on the inside parking lot, which is perpendicular to 8th Place; (3) said that only one person actually parks, however, since the others ride their bikes; (4) said that the hours are from 8:00 until 5:00 Monday through Friday and 8:00 until 3:00 on Saturday; (5) stated that no power tools are used outside at this business; (6) in response to questions from Comm. Marks, stated that he is unaware of any parking limitation signs on 8th Place. Ken Haas, landlord of 825 Hermosa Avenue, addressed the Commission and: (1) said that the lot is kept clean and cars are kept off the residential streets; (2) stated that he is unaware of any signs indicating parking limitations on 8th Place; (3) noted that Mr. Habash has been a good tenant, and he has had no complaints from anyone about Mr. Habash; (4) said that he owns the property, including the used car lot. Comm. Peirce referred to the plot plan and asked questions related to the parking, to which Mr. Haas replied that there are at least 12 parking spaces which are used by both the car lot and the auto detailing shop. Mr. Haas explained that he drew the plot plan; however, he noted that it is not to scale. "• Mr. Haas explained that Mr. Habash has made an agreement with the operator of the used car lot to use some of their parking. Comm. Marks asked questions related to the space at the rear of the property, to which Mr. Schubach explained that that area is a required setback used as a buffer between the commercial and residential uses. It was further noted that that area cannot be used for trash enclosures. Comm. Peirce noted that there is a possibility that a shared parking arrangement is being discussed. between Mr. Habash and the operator of the used car lot. He stated that the parking issue is a main factor in this decision. Mr. Haas agreed that parking is an important issue, but the situation is not as bad as it appears on the drawing. Public Hearing closed at 8:10 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Comm. Peirce, stated that this is a request for a master conditional use permit. He explained that staff recommended denial of the proposed use; however, the alternative is to approve the master CUP for the combination fof the auto sales and auto detailing businesses. Mr. Schubach explained that the auto detailing use would require three parking 'spaces. He stated, in response to questions from Comm. Peirce, that the parking spaces depicted on the plot plan are not legal, since they meet neither the size requirements nor the turning radius requirements. He stated that it has been noted in the past that that area has been used for displaying cars for sale. Comm. Peirce noted that it is admirable that the applicant is making an effort to have a successful business, and he commented on the manner in which cars are brought to the business. He noted, however, that there is not even adequate employee parking; therefore, he found it difficult to support approval of the request. Chmn. Ketz was not convinced that the available on-site parking would support both businesses as well as customers. She noted that this is a heavily impacted area, and she questioned whether parking would always be available on the streets. Comm. Marks discussed the plot plan and asked questions about the dimensions of the areas depicted. He stated that it is important to have plans which are drawn to scale. He felt that there is a possibility that the area in the rear could be used for additional parking; however, it would firstbe necessary to have the plans drawn to scale in order to ascertain the proper sizes. Mr. Habash explained that the lease agreement has not yet been finalized. He stated, however, that he would have a scale drawing prepared. MOTION by Comm. Marks, seconded by Comm. Peirce, to continue this matter to the meeting of March 5, 1991, for the purpose of allowing the applicant time to have a scale drawing prepared. The drawing shall also depict all buildings, walls, fences, parking spaces, and tenant space. AYES: Comms. Marks, Peirce, Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comm. Rue VAR 90-5,- VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 12 -FOOT GARAGE SETBACK RATHERHA THE REQUIRED 17 -FEET AND TO ALLOW A PARALLEL GUEST PARKING SPACE -BEHIND THE GARAGE AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECL'ARATION AT 1010 OWOSSO AVENUE Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated requested variance. This project is located in the R: _zone, with a lot size of 3200 Square feet. The building size is 2700 square feet. The subject_prop'erty is a corner lot located at the southeast corner of Owosso Aven nd 10th Street,,and it fronts on 10th Street. It is a rectangular -shaped lot of a typical size for theTarsea, and it downslopes away from the front of the lot. 1 ,--1991, and recommended denial of the COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No one appeared to address the Commission. CUP 90-25 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTO DETAILING AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. HABASH AUTO DETAILING (CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF DECEMBER 4. 1990) Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated December 26, 1990, and recommended that the Planning Commission deny the requested conditional use permit, based on insufficient parking for the combination of the proposed auto sales lot and the detailing business. As an alternative, staff recommended approval of a master conditional use permit for the combination of the auto sales and auto detailing businesses. At the meeting of December 4, 1990, the Planning Commission continued this request for consideration of a master CUP for the property in question and also based on the fact that neither the applicant nor the landowner was present for the hearing. Staff does not feel that the site can support these two distinct businesses because of the lack of customer and employee parking. However, if the Planning Commission is comfortable making a finding, in consideration of the detailing business' proposed use of a service to pick up and deliver all customer vehicles, and that the auto bays should count toward the parking requirement, then adoption of the proposed master CUP resolution would be appropriate. The proposed master resolution incorporates all conditions from the existing CUP for auto sales as well as suggested additional conditions for mitigating the impacts from the proposed auto detailing business. Mr. Schubach, in response to a question from Comm. Peirce related to the use of a valet service at this business, explained that even though the City does have a code enforcement officer,. strict enforcement of a valet service would be difficult to monitor over a long period of time. Public Hearing opened at 7:08 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz, who noted that no one appeared to speak on this issue. Mr. Schubach explained that the applicant was senta notice informing him of the date and time of this hearing. He stated that the applicant has not contacted the Planning Department regarding this matter, and he was unaware of the reason for the applicant's absence. Public Hearing closed at 7:09 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz. Comm. Rue recalled that the reason this hearing was continued from the last meeting was to allow the applicant and the landowner an opportunity to be present to discuss this matter; however, he noted that they did not appear and he therefore felt denial would be appropriate. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Marks, to deny the request to allow the operation of an auto detailing business in conjunction with an existing auto sales business at 825 Pacific Coast Highway, Habash Auto Detailing. AYES: Comms. Aleks, Marks, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None (The applicant arrived later in the meeting, and the public hearing on this item was reopened. See Page 16 of the minutes.) CUP 90-25 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTO DETAILING AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. HABASH AUTO DETAILING (CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF DECEMBER 4. 1990) (This matter was heard earlier in the meeting. See Page 2.) MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Rue, to reconsider the public hearing held on this matter. Comm. Aleks expressed concern that this matter is being reopened at this time.; noting that someone had left council chambers after the item was voted upon earlier in the -meeting. He stated that it is possible that public testimony would have been given had the person known that the matter was going to be reopened. Mr. Yoshinaga stated that this matter can be continued to a future date and renoticed so that interested citizens can be available to provide public testimony. As an alternative, the Commission can stand on the decision made earlier in the meeting. Mr. Schubach stated that, if the Commission decides to reopen and continue this hearing, the applicant would have to pay for postage and paper for the renoticing. The applicant would not, however, have to pay another hearing fee. (VOTE ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER) AYES: Comms. Aleks, Marks, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Aleks, to continue this public hearing to the meeting of February 5, 1991, with the matter to be renoticed (costs for postage and paper to be, paid by the applicant). No objections; so ordered. MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW AT 555 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Mr. Schubac , .ve staff report dated December 27, 1990, and recommended th. d e Planning Commission dir- staff to strictly enforce the conditions of the subjec onditional use permit. Between August 15, 1989, CUP. One of the 29 conditions and a mid -year review. Staff contin December 14, 1989, the Plannin osed by the Commission d by outlining the f MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by conditions of the subject conditional use pe ommission considered this ecified that there be an annual ings of the inspection. ks, to direct staff to strictly enforce the AYES: Comms. Aleks, M. - , Peirce, Rue, hmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None STAFF ITEMS a) M orandum Regarding City Council/Planning Commission Workshop e dates of February 21 and February 28 were suggested for the workshop. P.C. Minutes 1/2/91 AY)✓S . Comms. Aleks, Marks, Peirce, Chmn. Ketz NOES: mm. Rue ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chmn. Ketz stated that this decisiof the Planning Commis o c be appealed by writing to the City Council thirrt n days. CUP 90-25 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTO DETAILING AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 825 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. HABASH AUTO DETAILING Mr. Schubach gave staff report dated November 28, 1990, and recommended denial of the requested conditional use permit based on insufficient parking for the combination of the proposed auto sales lot and detailing business. As an alternative, staff suggested that the Planning Commission continue this hearing to the meeting of January 2, 1991, and require a master CUP for the auto sales and auto detailing business. The project is located in the C-3 zone, with a general plan designation of general commercial. The lot size is 9200 square feet, with 3534 square feet for the auto detailing use. The building size is 800 square feet. The current use is as a combination of auto sales lot and proposed new auto detailing shop. Three parking spaces are proposed (in the service bay). There are six parking spaces for the existing auto sales lot. The Habash Auto Detailing is located on the southwest corner of Pacific Coast Highway at 8th Place. It is set back in the west third of the lot, which has a used car dealership in front. The combined lot is approximately 9200 square feet. The hours of operation listed are 8:30 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday, with the sole purpose of auto detailing. The Habash Detailing business started operation without a business license or CUP. They were warned on many occasions to cease and desist until the proper waiting period for a business license and CUP, but they continued to operate. Especially noted was the fact that outside vehicle washing is occurring daily, after repeated warnings by various City Hall personnel to stop. This property is presently an authorized business for used auto sales. A CUP dated January 7, 1986, was approved to allow the expansion of an auto sales business to add the garages in the rear to replace a nonconforming residential use. Condition No. 6 of the CUP states: "The proposed garages shall be used only in connection with the automobile sales business unless adequate parking is provided for their use as a separate business. The determination of parking requirements shall be made by the Planning Director." This condition precludes a separate business on the property unless adequate parking is provided for all uses. The parking requirement for the entire lot, when used as one business, is nine spaces (based on one space per 1000 square feet of land area for an auto dealership). With the proposed separation of uses, the parking requirement is six spaces for the auto sales business and three for the proposed detail business (based on one space per 250 square feet of building area). With the subject proposal, the applicant intends to use his garage "bay" area to park three vehicles. Although that is sufficient to hold three vehicles, it is not sufficient to "work" on three vehicles at one time. Thus, the driveway is constantly clogged due to the lack of any additional parking. An additional space is proposed by using one of the six existing spaces from the auto sales lot. The proposed parking in the driveway area behind the garage is not acceptable since the area is inadequate for a turning area. At their meeting of October 18, 1990, the staff environmental review committee recommended a mitigated environmental negative declaration. Recommended were the following mitigation measures: (1) The wash water and liquids are not to be drained off site or in the storm drains; (2) No pinstriping or body moldings; (3) No alarms or biw-7ers on site; (4) No auto repair or large compressors; (5) Employee parking to be provided on site; (6) Hours of operation limited to 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday; (7) All signs must have prior approval before installation; (8) Trash dumpster must be fully enclosed on private property. The requested CUP would authorize the operation of an auto detailing business. The applicant indicates that the operation consists of the pick up of autos and would;`not involve drive -up customers. Whether or not parking is determined to be adequate hinges on approval of the garage bays as required parking. Mr. Schubach continued by noting additional concerns. The owner indicates the business is basically auto pick up with almost no walk-up trade. Because of the shortage of parking, auto pick up should be the only manner of operation. In the past, the washing of vehicles and occasional detailing has occurred outside in the driveway area. This should be absolutely forbidden. The drain/grease trap on the south side of the property where all liquids flow must be maintained and cleaned properly. An appropriate location for the trash dumpster needs to be determined. There is a small compressor used to blow lodged items from dash boards, etc. This should be the only authorized use of that equipment. On the proposed plot plan dated August 30, 1990, a stucco wall is either being proposed or suggested. This would effectively cut up the property. Such a wall should not be allowed since it sections the property into two separate parcels for all intents and purposes. This business has been operating illegally for approximately sixty days. They continue to wash cars in the driveways after repeated warnings by City personnel. Several items were recommended as conditions if a master CUP is recommended: (1) no auto repairs whatsoever; (2) no alarm installation, testing, or installations of any sort; (3) no outside phone buzzers, bells, etc; (4) no pinstriping or body moldings shall be conducted; (5) hours shall be limited to 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday; and (6) no outside work activities whatsoever. Staff felt that if Mr. Habash is to have his business as designated, he must adhere to the recommended conditions. The garages on the rear of the property were approved as an expansion to a used car lot to be used in conjunction there as stated in CUP 86-5. It does not seem appropriate to separate these garages out for use as a separate business. Comm. Rue asked questions related to the plot plan and the proposed drainage, to which Mr. Schubach explained that drainage is of great concern to the City and will be investigated before approval. Comm. Rue referred to the staff review minutes and asked for clarification on a recommendation by Commander Altfeld to require that conversations between employees shall be monitored. Mr. Schubach stated that such a condition is not included in the CUP; Comm. Aleks, however, felt that the recommendation was meant to preclude loud and/or boisterous language. P.C. Minutes 12/4/90 —32.— Public Hearing opened at 7:49 P.M. by Chmn. Ketz, who noted that the applicant was not present, and no one else appeared to speak on this issue. Public Hearing closed at 7:50 P.M. by Churn. Ketz. Mr. Schubach did not know why the applicant was not present at the public hearing. MOTION by Comm. Rue, seconded by Comm. Aleks, to approve staffs alternate recommendation to continue this hearing to the meeting of January 2, 1991, and require a master CUP for the auto sales and auto detailing. Comm. Peirce questioned whether the owner is subletting the service bays and is thus in violation of the City's regulations. He felt that the master lessee of the property should be present at the continued public hearing to address these issues. Churn. Ketz noted that there is already a master CUP in place, then, since there is already a CUP in place for this property. Comm. Marks asked how much noise will be generated by this business, to which Mr. Schubach explained that staff did not feel noise would be a problem so long as no work is performed outdoors. He continued by explaining that there are noise buffers. Also, the doors open out to the east toward the highway, which is noisier than the business itself would be. He also noted that the hours will be strictly controlled. Comm. Marks noted concern that work will be done outdoors, to which Mr. Schubach explained that outdoor work would constitute not only a violation of the CUP, but also a violation of the noise ordinance. Comm. Rue stressed the importance of the master CUP holder appearing at the continued public hearing so that the issues can be addressed. AYES: Comms. Aleks, Peirce, Rue, Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Comm. Marks Public Hearing continued to the meeting of January 2, 1991. VAR 9 -7 - VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE 17 -FOOT PARKING SETBACK AND ADOPTION 9F AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 1734` PROSPECT AVENUE Mr. Schubach gave staff re request by adoption of the propo dated November 27, 1990, and recommended approval of the resolution. This project is located in the R -2B zone, ' h a general plan designation of medium density. The existing use is as a single-family wit -permitted additional dwelling area for a handicapped relative. The lot size is 7,110 -square , and the existing building size is 2500 square feet. The proposed addition is for -i. garage remo • . nd expansion only. The subject lot is irregularly shaped and slopes upward from the s • -t. On July 18, 1977, the -Board of Zoning Adjustment granted a variance to allo ' e construction of a second dwelling area with a kitchen facility below the existing dwelling witho . dding the required parking. The variance was granted subject to the recording of a deed re : ction prohibiting the rental of the second unit and requiring the removal of the kitchen upon transfer of ownership. P.C. Minutes 12/4/90 - 33- CUP 90-25 Applicant: Jay Habash Conditional Use Permit for auto detailing at 825 Pacific Coast Hwy, Habash Auto Detailing. Mr. Robertson advised staff that the business is to the rear of 825 Pacific Coast Hwy. Mr. Robertson advised the applicant that required parkin provided. He also 5 -must be questioned the usage of the adjacent' -garages. Mr. Habash stated that one of the garages is used by the;:':prot owner. property Mr. Robertson advised staff that the business is already in operation. Mr. Habash explained that he picks up cars from outside dealerships and that there is no walk in traffic. Ms. Fehskens advised staff that she has seen the cars detailed in their driveway. Mr. Habash -responded that they are presently detailing indoors. Mr. Terry advised the applicant that there will be a new requirement prohibiting washing down residue from the cars into the streets. Mr. Habash stated that the residue and water are flushed into the sanitary system. Ms. Fehskens asked the applicant if the intended to erect any y Mr. Habash was uncertain at this time. Mr. Robertson stated that the plan indicated parking for, additional cars for the front of the property. Mr. Habash stated that he is presently able to place 3 cars in his garage. Ms. Fehskens asked the applicant where the employees park. Mr. Habash replied that they only have one car, and the car is parked behind Habash Cafe. Mr. Habash advised staff that the owner has given him one parking space to use, in exchange for periodically detailing his cars. Mr. Terry requested a condition that the wash water and other liquids not be allowed to drain onto the street or any other storm facility. Mr. Altfeld requested the hours of operation. Mr. Habash replied that the hours are Monday thru Saturday 8:30 a.m. thru 6 p.m. Commander Altfeld requested the following: * Hours of operation be limited to Monday thru Saturday 8:00 a.m. thru 6 p.m., and Sunday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. * No auto repair • No alarm installation or testing * No outside phone buzzers * No compressors * Conversation between employees to be monitored * Business be clearly addressed. Motion by Mr. Robertson to reccomend a negative declaration with the following mitigating measures: * The wash water and liquids not to be drained off-site or in the stormdrains; * No pinstriping or body mouldings; * No alarms or buzzers on site; * No auto repair or compressors; * Employee parking be provided on site; * Hours of operation limited to 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday thru Saturday; * All signs must be approved prior to installation * Trash dumpster must be fully enclosed on private property. Second by Commander Altfeld. No objections, so ordered. 3C- 5/.76_ C-- Sf f- I e J't MR. AND MRS. RICHARD A. SMITH, JR. 640 8th Place Hermosa Beach, California 90254 213/379-9178 January 31, 1991 City Hall Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 ,SAN 3 1 1991 Re: Conditional Use Permit for Auto Detailing and Adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 825 Pacific Coast Highway, Habash Auto Detailing. To the Planning Department: We appreciate the notice from your department regarding the February 5, 1991 hearing for Habash Auto Detailing's request for a Conditional Use Permit and adoption of an Environmental Negative Declaration at 825 Pacific Coast Highway (copy enclosed). Since we are unfortunately unable to attend the hearing, we have written this communication outlining our concerns about this business. Lack of Adequate Parking Our complaint regarding allowing this business to obtain their permit is that since this business has been operating there has..:been an increase in non-resident/commercial'traffic• on the street. The parking on both sides of the upper one-third portion of 8th Place is taken over by customer vehicles'during the. entire day. As..you all are well aware of the parking scarcity in Hermosa Beach, that means that .very often residents of this street, especially on the two street-. cleaning days of Wednesday and Thursday, must block their driveways (most residents on this street have only one -car garages) in order to park, or park one to several blocks away from their residences.. It is somewhat annoying. but unavoidable in the first place that the commercial businesses on PCH use residential streets for parking, but that use has escalated since Habash Auto Detailingopened their business. Also, there is a matter of safety. Personnel of Habash Auto Detailing often move the customer vehicles around, sometimes screeching up and down 8th Place at high speeds. This presents.a hazard to pedestrians and 'there are increased noise levels due to this increased traffic. Page Two Letter to City Hall Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach January 31, 1991 As far as a solution to the increased traffic and noise problems, we have heard before from a neighbor that:at one time several years ago there was.attempt to have 8th Place closed off at the east end of the street nearest PCH to pass through traffic, but the attempt was unsuccessful. We feel that would be a viable answer to the traffic problems since it would allow some commercial parking at the east end of the street, but close off the rest of the street for residential use only. We would support such a solution and would appreciate your suggestion on how to initiate it. Toxic Hazards We are concerned about any environmental hazards that a business such as auto detailing might pose. Auto detailers use various strong solvents to clean cars, and we are concerned about those solvents traveling down the rest of the street. We are serious about eventually raising our family on this street and do not want any undo harm to come to our and the other families residing on 8th Place. Currently, there are other small children living on this street who Iiould not be unnecessarily exposed to toxic chemicals and waste flowing down the street. It is our belief that 825 Pacific Coast Highway is not a fitting place for an auto detailing business to operate. Richard and Loretta Smith :RAS/LCT Enclosure i February 6, 1991 TO: City of Hermosa Beach FROM: HABASH & HILL AUTO DETAILING RE: Residents of Hermosa Beach MAS 9(31 This letter is to inform you that all residents of Eighth Place of Hermosa Beach, has signed an agreement. The agreement is to let City of Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce know that their is no complaints against HABASH & HILL AUTO DETAILING. If their is any complaints we will have them changed immediately to the satisfactory of the residents request. Proof of references are enclosed on page two, and you may call them at any time. Sincerely, Mr. Habash President Aar ,nclosure D.Z./J.H. FROM THE RESIDENTS OF HERMOSA BEACH 1) NAME ADDRESS ✓ ' /I � g le•. te. PHONE # COMMENTS No eCtMrktr1q 2) NAME b ' el\At ^ ADDRESS 6337 k PHONE # J -t3 3") 4,7-- "l -S COMMENTS Vld CbLf\,\ 'Vt S 3) NAME e,v._ vt e-- S 4 4-1 .ADDRESS 47+3-,3 (?L LI)/ 'L+-�-- PHONE # COMMENTS 6-0/4.4 4) NAME ADDRESS PHONE .# • COMMENTS 5) NAI'E• 3 7 ADDRESS PHONE # COMMENTS ,-U 6217-A(//d/4/74•17 6) NAIIE JJ-z— ADDRESS PHONE # (co NAME, FROM THE RESIDENTS OF HERMOSA BEACH l‘Lz )2 %///�o�/G ADDRESS Ark/c1 PHONE #. (a i) 38' C6 3V COMMENTS c- 0 it7-2/9%L/ /14, eit,ze/ht(;(71 NAME PHONE # COMMENTS 3) NAME ADDRESS PHONE # COMMENTS G#1.pi 00484*drchi— j/.8,4 .4 /7U,,8 4/e yCeIyA44/40.:. ADDRESS7/0 frit/ Atte" 4) NAME ADDRESS PHONE .# COMMENTS 6)1, 4 -) 4- (i -c. ( ( N(i). 00 -mid c s 5) NAME ?-/•-h,°h6c7 ADDRESS PHONE # COMMENTS NAME /Von //0 62,eet/Z4/47S eaeu ob,42u:GbAsm 745 — 8-12 3`14-'5(3 /\LO ADDRESS PHONE # 631 cam %�/o CDrvtp(ab_i/L C FROM THE RESIDENTS OF HERMOSA BEACH 1) NAME ADDRE PHONE #. "COMMENTS 2) NAME ADDRESS PHONE # COMMENTS • 3) NAME ADDRESS PHONE # COMMENTS v -t 6 ec--)-1 37cp �tCc kt, Wu} 0) ci ),,q 4) NAME ,,) 57 .2--;171Wi �3/ yl�� l.(�Giit it/�5�5 ADDRESS PHONE 1 COMMENTS 5) NAME ADDRESS PHONE # COMMENTS h`2 (3 A//1)..t1/4_,4 NAME �i'� 1 ( ADDRESS PRONE # 3/6- 350/ FROII THE RESIDENTS OF HERMOSA BEACH 1) NAME ADDRESS PHONE #. COMMENTS 2) NAME ADDRESS. PHONE # COMMENTS 3) NAME -3-2 2- 22.-/ce /v© 0,10/13,/„)-/-* 730 3 /9/ e ijry)7 'S' 'k !� -cdfiA. 3� -J(cl ADDRESS PHONE # COMMENTS 4) NAME ADDRESS PHONE # 'COMMENTS NTS -NAME ADDRESS PHONE # COMMENTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE # February 25, 1991 1991 To: Habash & Hill Auto Detailing From : :Ir. Kenneth Haas Re: Rental Agreement I Kenneth Haas, rent the South-West corner of 3251 Pacific Coast Highway to Habash and Hill Auto Detailing. On a Twenty-four month rental agreement, for the amount of one -hundred dollars per month. Last month deposit will be paid in advance. Premises must be vacated within a thirty day prior notification of business termination. At Least one parking spot will be vacated with prior notice for unloading and loading of equinrent by. land -lord. All the conditions stated on the master lease will also apply to this lease agreement. Other -wise this agreement will be immediatley null and void. Mr J. riabas h (TENANT) Mr. K. Haas (LAQD-LORD) tC G- .7 ►� t. t 441=11 A H. - . 1. ue -may ,gas H 30-4:1 f s"Yz. - j)443e-- Z� 2( A eo Saute. by D ` "7/1 - 'CDC e7 ( b;04, 1-5l V" 062�5� '-- U'/ 5/ t1/4„_ I7_, \ °1 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I, the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury that I did on the 22+h day of /L4A—i / , 199/ , deposit into the United States Post Office, first class postage prepaid, a copy of the Public Notice attached as Exhibit "A" to each and every person attached as Exhibit "B". I warrant that the persons named on Exhibit_"B" are all the persons required by applicable law to receive the Public Notice attached as Exhibit "A"-=• I understand and agree •that it is my responsibility to cause these Public Notices to be made in an aaccurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the City harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said notice or notices. In the event an action is instituted in a court of competent jurisdiction which questions the legality of the Public Notices, then the City may in its exclusive discretion suspend all hearings or cause the cessation of any consturction or of any use which was permitted as a result of a hearing which was held on accordance with the Public Notice. In the event that the court declares the notice or noticing procedure to be effective, then the City may in its exclusive discretion revoke any permits granted and cause any approvals given pursuant to those Public Notices to be declared null and void and I agree on behalf of myself and my heirs, assigns or successors -in -interest to hold the City harmless in connection therewith. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. I have executed this declaration on this the 2-:2( day of 2([_ , 199( at Hermosa Beach, California. P . H yu - [NIG- (Name) (Name) JJ 4'SgI atti o) Dm,Aff j A lit/Cs (l,bE (Capacity). State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) SS On this the .x`44 day of 4,.424"` 199/ , before me, , the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared k__)//,,s3 Tr, and proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi4ence to be the person (s)• whose name (s) /S suscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that 54z„ executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) 41 OFFICIAL SEAL yEPI OF IN ELAINE C,..DOERFLI.NG m �• g o� NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Expires Oct. 11•, 199/1 •' - h NOTARY PUBLIC April 2, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meetingof: the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1991 SUBJECT: BILTMORE ACTION PLAN INITIATED BY STAFF PURPOSE: TO DETERMINE THE STEPS TO BE TAKEN FOR FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE BILTMORE' SITE Recommendation Direct staff to begin procedural steps to amend the General Plan and zoning to be consistent with the Coastal Commission's decision on the City -owned Biltmore Site and Lot C. Background On August 14, 1990, the City Council adopted a resolution and ordinance changing the Biltmore Site to medium density residential, SPA zoning and Parking Lot C to General Commercial, C-2 zoning. At the March 13, 1991 public hearing, the Coastal Commission approved a modified version of the City's request ultimately to develop the Biltmore Site consisting of 12 existing lots and vacated right-of-way as residential. At this time, the Coastal Commission staff has not completed preparing the minutes and cannot provide in writing, or orally, the official final decision in detail. However, the City staff is confident that it understands the Coastal Commission's decision adequately to proceed since time is of the essence if there is any thought to placing the final resolution on the November Ballot. Thefollowing is staff's understanding of the Coastal Commission's decision; the only uncertainty is the condition regarding Public Parking Lot C, the area between Hermosa Avenue on th east, Beach Drive on the west, 14th Street on the south and 15th Court on the north, item 3 below; 1. Mixed Residential/Commercial shall provide low -rise development with no less than 30% leasable floor area, not including parking devoted to C-1 Commercial, restaurant or beach support recreation use. 2. (Public Open Space Acquisition overlay) shall provide for the acquisition of public open space principally within the. coastal zone of the City of Hermosa Beach, The overlay shall provide that no sale of the property shall take place until a trust fund has been established for the sole purpose of acquiring and improving such new public open space. The form and content of the trust fund shall specify the following provisions and shall be submitted to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission for his/her review and approval as to inclusion of the following provisions. Zoning adopted to implement the (Public Open Space Acquisition overlay) shall provide that of the funds received by the City in the sale of the subject property for residential/Commercial mixed uses at least 80% of an amount up to the maximum of $8,000,000 received from the sale of the property shall be used for the acquisition and improvement of new open space property (not currently owned by the City), of which at least 70% of said new open space property shall be located within the Coastal Zone. The minimum area to be acquired in the Coastal Zone is 4 acres. The ordinance shall also provide that no building permits for construction on the subject property shallbe issued until either 1) the new minimum 4 acres of open space property has been acquired, or 2) the funding necessary to comply with this policy has been dedicated to the purchase of said open space and a binding contract has been signed guaranteeing such a purchase, of no less than 80% of the required new open space property. 3. Parking Lot C shall be restricted to public parking use. Note: A Biltmore Site open space initiative, has already been scheduled to be on the November, 1991 ballot. Analysis The City has six months to reject the Coastal Commission's decision under state law. If rejected, the Biltmore Site will revert back to the Hotel Specific Plan Area and the City's current General Plan and zoning will be inconsistent. Staff believes that the Coastal Commission decision should be accepted and the City should proceed with implementation as noted in the recommendation., Going through the public hearing process will maximize input on how best to implement the Coastal Commission decision. Also, it hopefully will build consensus at the Planning Commission and Council level, as well as in the community. If the City Council opts to place its decision on the November Ballot, it is important that the necessary changes are adopted as soon as possible. The following process needs to take place: 1. Amend general Plan in annual 2nd quarter General Plan amendment to designate Biltmore Site for mixed commercial / residential use accordingly; 2nd quarter Land Use amendments are scheduled,commence on April 18th, and will be submitted to the City Council on June 25th for adoption. 2. Amend zoning ordinance Specific Plan Area to be consistent with general Plan and amended Certified Land Use Plan. 3. Notify Coastal Commission of acceptance of their decision after public hearing, If the decision to place on the ballot is made and the measure fails, hien, the City will need to adopt a new amendment and propose it to the Coastal Commission. Once the above process is complete, then, the whole matter could be placed on the ballot; the Council can decide the ballot question as part of the above process. Future decisions will need to be made regarding the sale of the property. According to the Coastal Commission the property could be sold as a package, or divided into residential and commercial portions, and sold separately. If ultimately. the Coastal Commission's decision is found to differ significantly from the City staff's understanding, staff will report these differences immediately._..- the oun fl. /7 CONCUR: Mich' elL Schubach Planning Director evin E. Nort , raft City Manager City Manager Comment Because there are several ways to design the Coastal Commission's 70% residential/30% commercial alternative, the public hearing process is the recommended way to develop the best option. The voters in November, 1991 then will know the specifics of the alternative to a park, whether there is one or two Biltmore measures on the ballot. Council need not decide now whether to place the Coastal Commission option on the ballot; however, if you choose to decide this issue now, these points are relevant. Favoring a Council -sponsored ballot measure is the Council's prior vote to place residential on the ballot as a result of the flawed referendum petition. The Coastal Commission did not approve this option, but the current option is still 70% residential. Second, the voters would have a better understanding of the two options if both were on the ballot. The main disadvantage of a Council -sponsored ballot measureis the likelihood that neither issue would pass, based on the ten previous ballot measures. p/ccsrspa Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council City Council Meeting. of March 26, 1991 STRAND SAFETY SUB -COMMITTEE REPORT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize installation of dismount structures at 2nd St., 10th St., 14th St., 22nd St., and 27th St. for a sixty (60) day evaluation period. BACKGROUND : At the regular Council meeting of October 14, 1986, City Council appointed a Strand Safety Advisory Committee to study the entire Strand safety' problem and instructed the Committee to come back with recommendations regarding possible solutions to improve the safety on the Strand. During subsequent meetings of the Strand Safety Committee various ideas to improve the safety of the Strand were discussed. These included building a separate bike path on the beach, moving the bike path to another area and banning bicycles from the Strand, placing speed bumps along the Strand, placing dismount structures• along the Strand, and many others. The final recommendation made to Council at the regular meeting of March 24, 1987 was to designate a walk zone on the Strand between 10th and 15th streets, to place flashing lights and signs to designate the walk zone, and to require bicycles and skateboards to be walked when the lights were flashing. The committee recommended that the lights should only be turned on during heavily conjested times, and that police officers would make the determination as to when the lights would be operated. After the necessary construction was completed, the Police Department published a Strand safety pamphlet and began a concerted education phase to acquaint the Strand users with the walk zone rules. This effort included placing officers at each end of the walk zone to hand out the pamphlets and warn persons riding bicycles and skateboards of the new law. The local bicycle shops and newspapers were also contacted and advised of the walk zone. The education phase continued for several weeks with the officers reporting over 90% voluntary compliance with the walk zone. The enforcement phase of the walk zone then began and officers either warned or cited violators. 1 Since its inception, there were a few signs and more lights added to the walk zone area in order to make it more visible to the Strand users. In 1989, a concentrated enforcement effort eliminated trick riding of bicycles and skateboards on the pier head which further improved the safety in the area. The topic of Strand safety continued to be a concern of many citizens. There have been numerous letters and citizens comments regarding the Strand, its use and the safety concerns. Many of those comments have included suggested improvements for the Strand. At the regular meeting of December 11, 1990, Council appointed a Council sub -committee to meet with staff in order to review the current Strand uses, evaluate success of previous safety changes, identify problem areas, and recommend solutions to Council. ANALYSIS: The first meeting of the Strand Safety Sub -Committee was held on January 22, 1991. At that meeting, the committee identified the following as the major safety problems on the Strand: 1. Trends indicate there will be more people on the Strand in the future, not less; 2. The mixed use of the Strand is a contributing factor to accidents; 3. Speeding bicycles are a primary factor in many accidents; and 4. Although most accidents occur outside the walk zone, monitoring of the need to activate the lights needs improvement. The committee reviewed all historical materials and information available from previous committees and sub -committees regarding. the use of the Strand and found that the same conclusions had been reached in the past. In searching for solutions to the identified problems listed above, the committee concluded that there were really no new ideas that had not been, discussed in the past. At a meeting on March 7, 1991, the committee decided that the following solutionsmight best address the problems identified above: 1. To discourage speeding bicycles and improve strand safety, dismount structures should be placed at 2nd St., 10th St., 14th St., 22nd St., and 27th St. These dismount structures would be designed so that bicyclists would have to dismount in order to walk their bikes through, thus causing several interruptions along the entire length of 2 the Strand which would discourage speed and encourage safe travel through engineering and still allow bicycles to use the Strand. The recommended dismount areas are located at areas with higher pedestrian and traffic volumes. The Sub -committee is recommending that the dismount structures be installed at the locations for a sixty (60) day evaluation period. This evaluation period would allow appraisal of the various configurations and styles of dismount structures and the effectiveness of the dismount structures. Different conceptual drawings for dismount structures which would be used during the evaluation period are being obtained by the City Traffic Engineer and scheduled to be available for the Council meeting of April 9th. The dismount structures will be installed with safety in mind and will be clearly marked and visible in order to avoid accidents. Additionally, the installations will be engineered in order to allow access of emergency vehicles in the area. 2. To improve the activation of the walk zone, it was suggested that the Lifeguards be authorized to notify the Dispatch Center to turn on the lights when they felt the number of people present justified activation. This recommendation is intended to enhance and increase monitoring of the walk zone area with individuals who are familiar with, and trained in assessment of crowds and safety. The foregoing recommendations are aimed at improvement of safety on the Strand while still allowing all of the current uses. The topic of a separate bike path was discussed by the Sub- committee also. As in the past, the idea of a bike path on the beach was discussed. The Sub -committee felt before any further discussion was held on this topic we should first obtain an opinion from the City Attorney regarding the legality of constructing a path on the beach. The City Attorney has been asked to research this question and the Subcommittee will hold further discussion on his opinion has been submitted. Concur: evin B. North •' aft City Manager 3 y Subii.tted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety HERMOSA BEACH GREENBELT BIKEPATH APRIL 7, 1991 SURVEY This was a public opinion survey performed by two interested volunteers to determine the feasibility of a Greenbelt Bikepath . The survey was conducted by Dick Kenny and Hal Rush at Civic Center and at the Strand. The protocol was to ask randomly selected people if they were Hermosa Beach residents and if they were, would they like to express their opinion on the. proposed bikepath. The survey included 107 people and roughly 50% were contacted by each poll taker. Due to time constraints 68 people were polled at Civic Center on the Greenbelt at Pier Ave. and 39 were polled at the Strand at Pier Ave. There was no significant difference in poll taker results and very few people (< 5%) had no opinion or declined to comment. The following results have been determined from this poll:: 1.) 90 % of the residents polled are bikers in Hermosa Beach 2.) Residents contacted near the Greenbelt were stronger supporters of the bikepath idea. 3.) 93 % of all residents polled favored the proposal 4.) 92 % of all the bikers polled would use the Greenbelt bikepath. II DI' 1 A BEACH RESIDENTS GREENBELT BIKEPATH PUBLIC OPINION POLL l t City Council is interested in your opinion regarding the desirability of making a cinder bikepath/jogging track on the city owned abandoned railbed along Valley Drive. The plan is to obtain state funds to landscape this parkland and make it accessible to more residents. A primary objective is to provide a safe alternate route from the Strand bikepath thereby relieving congestion. POLL LOCATION PI ER AVE ► CIVIC C VAL-7e DATE . A mem. 41.7, ige1 1 . xi b $7,A'UI Do You • �,�u... JWULu ao Bike Favor_ Oppose Would use 0 7TAL 'szkLkrj Pottrj 9 7 99 r . r9 April 9, 1991 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS. OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH We, the undersigned, residents of Hermosa Beach, strongly oppose the proposed dismount structures on the strand. We feel that such barricades would only serve to penalize the residents who ride bicycles on the strand in a responsible manner. We feel that the bicyclists, skateboarders, skaters and pedestrians who do not use the strand in a safe manner and who violate the right of way of others are the only ones who should be singled out. Therefore, we strongly urge you to consider some type of enforcement for violators. Possibly consideration should be given to recruiting civilian enforcers to issue citations. This would encourage compliance with the laws and would also bring additional revenue to the City. We understand the City of Huntington Beach uses a radar gun. The walk zone was established at considerable expense, but nothing is effective unless it is consistently enforced. The committee's report gives no statistics regarding accidents or when they occur. But, common sense would tell us that problems would occur primarily on weekends and during the summer months. We use the bike path all year long. The walk zone allows users to go through when there is no congestion. The dismount structures would obviously be stationery and would diminish the residents' enjoyment of the strand all year long. We were unaware of this Committee, do not know who the members are and only became aware of this proposal by reading the agenda on the day of this meeting. Possibly you will consider a public hearing or other method of allowing resident input before deciding on a drastic measure that will effect so many residents. The signatures to this letter were only gathered over a three hour period of time during early afternoon. Hopefully, this will indicate to you the strong opposition. NAM : ADDRESS: )1/11)ettr $4&` frn7l //1 NAME: ADDRESS: 49S1.7,ao S1 AialAt%(/ 31,4) i‘e>g 433- 4-k‘ 3iiVttAOU.vE t'l °t o S' /232- /trig 9azszi 7vs zV ° ' IL gedtIPAAVA,ou-frife,"/16 /140 740A e&o- to / oiA/)/ Natr ec CY d.? etc-- /109t gAA12'e'L- J eAmmPy-- Mo-x4k JCMC,J ddizeD /9r)der,5'oh Ja/bed,a4AzW, 0 at ife,,in:cKA4-(4 ?"6)-ey a4 n A ye 9A-00 0354-- 7 I() ffrtihc.Hit) 5Y /4714-71" l 174) AL;11-7,L #01-171),e, 416- 7c ¢ ct 0 f, 6-, , 1-0 P .cR.(27- ,� )-do P;c,c acr/44,p5c, eick NAME: a, d, A(6r‘ �l G ADDRESS: (p5 z 1-143- 41-teitincia‘LsgeittA /2 / l/ a - - = 4.4Y r C/" 4111/,41.114,/,‘,4A*S-_, /SO #rte.Ds dvs- [1,2_,441, 41 104-D 4OPI c k 0_1 Mivw\ , J AVE 0-i: gas. YC )() 1)6 w iffU* (767 tx1rx0). NAME: ADDRESS: '57 L (.019561 7ze/./17/1— ff61-/v4c 7 o Pis c/1 ( 4PA 1-1a2-01054- ffi f- (2l7 )'" pc.. ticrfriou 61, 307 4/164/14 Y1 6 ro/sw- gl_ct OA/ Gb4 kleigeg Vaitie i(sk NAME: ADDRESS: Honorable Mayor and Members SU PLEMENTAL INFORMATION April 4, 1991 y--9-9•1 City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1991 SUPPLEMENTAL TO REQUEST TO APROVE NEW CLASS SPECIFICATION FOR CABLE TELEVISION/PUBLIC INFORMATION COORDINATOR Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Council (1) approve the proposed class specification for Cable Television/Public Information Coordinator; and, (2) authorize the City Manager to sign a Supplementalto the Administrative Bargaining Unit to establish a salary range for the position. Background: On September 11, 1990, the Council approved a change in the authorized positions of the City by deleting one-half Technical Aide position in the General Services Department and adding one-half Cable Television Coordinator in the Community Resources Department. (See attached September 4, 1990 staff. report). At the March 26, 1991 Council meeting, in response to an agenda item requesting approval of the new class specification for Cable T.V./Public Information Coordinator, the Council requested additional information regarding the transfer of duties associated with administration of the City's Cable T.V. franchise from the General Services Department to the Community Resources Department. Analysis: The rationale for this change is, by placing the responsibility. for cable television as the primary responsibility of a half time position, more efficient time and effort can be devoted to both the franchise renewal process and our increasingly active public access efforts. Also, the Community Resource Department is more oriented to public, community activities. Duties of Cable T.V. Coordinator: The duties currently being performed by the Administrative Aide assigned responsibility for the cable function include: Receive, log, and attempt to adjust citizen complaints regarding service, outages, conduct of cable personnel, etc.; administer and monitor the franchise requirements and conditions; staff CATV Board when active to prepare minutes and agenda items (a citizen board is required as part of the renewal process); periodically conduct community. interest surveys and needs assessments and evaluate existing public access programming and make recommendations regarding programming improvements; prepare written reports regarding cable activities; determine city television equipment needs and prepare appropriate bid specifications; prepare and administer cable budget; coordinate activities with other city organizations and departments; supervise camera operator assigned to filming city meetings; delivery of meeting agendas and other announcements to cable company for display on character generator; encourage and promote cable coverage of City activities; and, set-up and maintain internal files relating to the cable franchise. In addition to the above on-going duties currently assigned, during the renewal process the Cable Television Coordinator will have an active role over the next three year period in coordinating and conducting meetings between the City and Cable representatives. The other existing duties of the Administrative Aide in the General Services Department include responsibility for non -safety telecommunications, preparation of staff reports for General Services Department and VPD assignments, and other administrative support functions. This position can also be utilized to provide some data entry support depending on workload. The area of responsibility assigned to the position will be further addressed during considerations for reorganization of the General Services Department. Other Cities In developing the class specification for this position, several surrounding cities were surveyed. In Redondo Beach,the responsibility for the cable franchise is assigned to the Director of Library and Media Services; The City of Torrance has a Cable Television Administrator and a Production Specialist; in Manhattan Beach the Cable responsibility is assigned to the Assistant Administrative Services Director with assistance provided by the department's Administrative Aide; Santa Monica has a Cable T.V. Manager; El Segundo has a Community Cable Program Supervisorin the Parks and Rec. Department who coordinates the cable filming of City events and meetings. As opposed to utilities who are governed .by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), there is no such entity for governing local cable television. Each local agency negotiates the terms of the franchise agreement, monitors the cable activities, and addresses complaints received from local users. It should also be kept in mind that the newly created classification contains responsibility for enhancing other areas of public communication such as promoting special events and publication of the recreation brouchure and budget. Salary Comparison Although the classification assigned Cable T.V. responsibilities is currenty an Administrative Aide; it was the half-time Technical Aide classification which was eliminated as it was vacant. Because of the nature of the duties indicated in the Tech. Aide classification, it is not possible to simply transfer the same class to the Community Resources Department to perform the Cable function. The monthly salary of the half-time Technical Aide who held the position was $1,203 (top step with longevity). It is anticipated that the Cable T.V. Coordinator will be appointed at the first or second step of the proposed salary range which would be $1,150 - $1,208 (plus potential for up to an additional $91/mo for exceptional performance). By the time the new coordinator reaches top step, the reorganization of General Services will be accomplished at what is hoped to be considerable savings over current costs. Respectfully Submitted: 45-2&hZ /,W Robert A. Blackwood, Personnel Director pc/supple Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager September 4, 1990 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 11, 1990 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CHANGE IN STAFFING FOR CABLE TELEVISION COORDINATION Recommendation; That the City Council approve a change in authorized positions of the City by deleting one-half Technical Aide position in the General Services Department and adding one-half Cable Television Coordinator in the Community Resources Department, and reduce the salaries account in General Services by $9,700 while increasing the salary account in Community Resources by $9,700. Background: The coordination of the City's cable television franchise and governmental and public access efforts has been handled by our General Services Department, through the Administrative Aide to the Director. This assignment has not proven to be optimal, as the General Services Department does not have direct contact with public information programs. During the process of the review of our cable operation by a citizen's committee, the lack of ade- quate staffing was a repeated concern. The City's fifteen year franchise for cable television with MultiVision Cable expires on October 10, 1993. October 1, 1990 begins the renewal period during which public input is to be ob- tained and a new franchise negotiated with the cable operator. Analysis: Staff feels that reassigning the coordination of our cable tele- vision franchise to the Community Resources Department will result in more external contacts with the community and those involved and concerned about cable television. Community Resour- ces is actively involved in programming and public information matters, and their contacts in the community and filming industry make this reassignment a logical choice. The timing of the change in assignments appears especially ap- propriate, as both the General Services Department and Community Resources have new department directors. Also, the renewal pro- cess, which will be a major effort of the City, is just about to begin. Increased, pro -active staffing is appropriate at this time to assure the next renewal period offers our community the best available cable television system with the widest options. At the same time, relieving the Administrative Aide in General Services of this responsibility will allow that position to serve more directly the new General Services Director. lh The change in assignment will result in a reduction of a half- time Technical Aide position in the General Services Department, and creation of a half-time position in the Community Resources Department. It is hoped that by placing the responsibility for cable television as a sole responsibility in a half-time posi- tion, more time and effort can be devoted to the renewal and our increasingly active public access efforts. The duties of the deleted Technical Aide position will be shared by the others in the General Services Department. Further, the workload of that department should reduce considerably when we have installed the computerized ticket writers for automated data entry. While the transfer of salary monies is roughly the same, this is due to the difference in steps. The technical Aide was budgeted at the top step, and it was assumed that the Cable T.V. coordina- tor will be appointed at mid-range. evin B. Nor craft City Manager' cc: Community Resources General Services Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director March 19, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 9, 1991 REPORT ON NEED ASSESSMENT STUDY AND DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR POSSIBLE CITY HALL EXPANSION Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report. Background: On June 14, 1988 the City Council reviewed a report titled "Report on Need. Assessment Study and Preliminary Design Alternatives For Possible City Hall Expansion, CIP 88-609." The City Council action was to receive and file report on needs assessment study for City Hall space requirements. On February 20, 1991 the City Council asked for a copy of that report and that it be agendized. The report is attached for Council review. Analysis: The report was prepared in response to a concern that inadequate floor space exists. The report discusses three alternatives to increase the available floor space. Summary: The need for additional floor area still exists. However, the area needs may change depending on future Council decisions regarding contracting. Respectfully submitted, Aallid ALA -44r AnthWy Antich Public Works Dir-ctor Concur: / / Kevin B. North aft City Manager City Manager's Comment Modular office furniture was funded in 1989-90 to maximize existing space, but has not yet been purchased. Pending resolution of contracting options, no further action is recommended. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 90-91 THROUGH FY 94-95 PROGRAM AREA: PROJECT NUMBER & NAME: Public Buildings and Grounds Improvements CIP 89-609 Possible City Hall Expansion ACCOUNT NUMBER: 305-401-8609-4201 PROJECT LOCATION & DESCRIPTION: This project proposes to provide more floor area for City Hall offices and new air conditioning for the basement of the Police Department and the General Services Department. Design is scheduled for FY 89-90 and construction in FY 90-91. PROJECT BACKGROUND & STATUS: Space allocation study performed and presented to City Council. SCHEDULED FISCAL YEAR START: FY 90-91 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: FY 90-91 $-0- CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Explore options based on various staffing scenarios. CIP/cippch 8/16/90 CIP 89-609 POSSIBLE CITY HALL EXPANSION EXPENDITURES PROJECT ELEMENTS EXPENDED PRIOR TO FY89-90 BUDGET FY89-90 EXPENDED THRU 2/28/90 ESTIMATED EXPENDED 6/30/90 ESTIMATED BALANCE 6/30/90 BUDGET FY90-91 BUDGET FY91-92 ESTIMATED FUTURE NEEDS ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 0 0 0 PLANS, SPECS & ESTIMATES 0 0 150,000 150,000 CONSTRUCTION 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 SO 530,000 1,500,000 , SO 1,530,000 INSPECTION SO 530,000 TOTAL UNFUNDED 0 100,000 100,000 OTHER DIRECT COSTS 5165,000 51,760,000 51,925,000 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 0 0 150,000 1,600,000 0 1,750,000 CONTINGENCY 0 15,000 160,000 175,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURE SO $30,000 SO SO $30,000 SO SO 5165,000 31,760,000 SO $1,925,000 FUNDING SOURCES 001 GENERAL FUND . 30,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FUNDING SO 530,000 SO 530,000 SO , SO 30 SO SO SO 530,000 TOTAL UNFUNDED 5165,000 51,760,000 51,925,000 .,ice •�,: �.'.:__.,�. Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 7,1988 Regular Meeting of June 14, 1.988 REPORT ON NEED ASSESSMENT STUDY AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR POSSIBLE CITY HALL EXPANSION, CIP 88-609 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Receive and file this report. 2. Consider this project as part of the 5 -year Capital Improvement Program. .Background: The Hermosa Beach City Hall was constructed in 1964. The building was designed with the basement level used primarily as a storage area. The structural framework was designed to support a third -floor level to be added during future expansion. Over the last two decades, significant changes have occurred in regard to City functions and staffing levels. The Planning Department was added and located in the basement. 'General Services and the Police Department were also accomodated in the basement. •Staffing levels have increased to meet the growth in public service needs by Hermosa Beach residents. As a result, storage space,in City Hall has been limited. Paper products are currently stored in mechanical rooms and stairwells;. Some plans and blueprints are stored in the Community Center. _0n March 2, 1988 BOA Architecture provided the City of Hermosa Beach with its findings on a Needs Assessment Study analyzing the space requirements for City Hall. The.findings were based on current needs and estimated future needs five years in advance, compiled from the results of a survey distributed to department heads and employees during September of 1987. •The Needs Assessment Study is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Three preliminary design alternatives were recommended: Schemes A, B and C. Analysis: This analysis will be divided into the following sections: 1. Comparison of Useable Space 2. Description of Schemes A, B & C 3. Comparison of Alternatives 4. Fiscal Impact 1. Comparison of Usable Space The results of the architect's survey are listed below for each' function, showing usable floor space in existence now as well as space required 'and provided for in Schemes A, B and C. FUNCTION City Manager City Attorney City Council City Clerk Planning Buildg. & Safety General Services. Public Works Personnel 'Finance/Treasurer EXISTING REQR'D. SCHEME A SCHEME B SCHEME C SQ.FT. SQ.FT. 516 114 , 365 735 1286 1350 260 874 Police Department 4546 Community Resources off-site n/a Copy -Room 104 236 Kitchen 102 108 Lunch -Room 6.04 604 Basement Storage 516 458 'Future Expansion --- 2491(4) 547 .492 874 684 78 .116 204 . 72 153 ---(1) 336 216. 814 310 779 410 1361 1088 1279 1455 1657 1212 1368 1727 2072 1462 2250. 1466- 1269 1466 .1269 1020 1292. 1472 804 317 816 536 1320 890 1138. 1078 3910 4155 4155 4799(3) n/a. n/a(2) n/a . 236 '236 236 108 108 108 604 604 604 458 458 412 2491 --- TOTAL: 12,329 17,882 12,468 18,388 NOTE: Square Footages are based on usable space only and reflect service and support areas (i.e. mechanical rooms, lobbies, etc.) 16,275 do not restrooms, Shared space with other department. Community Resources may be placed in Future Expansion. Increased area can be utilized as future expansion or storage similar to Schemes A and B. Scheme.0 allowsfor increase in property andevidence, exercise and training rooms.. Architect's estimated space for future expansion and storage space. 2. Descriptions of Schemes A, B & C Scheme A (No Major Addition): 2NO PLR - !ST FLi - ATRIUM NEW SKYLIGHT COUNCIL CHAMBER SCHEME A tol6E HE NT POLICE FACILITY Additional usable floor space: 139 sq.ft. (1% increase).. Estimated cost: $959,166 2 Scheme A utilizes systems furniture; a modular partitioned furniture system which has storage areas and work surfaces integrated into units which can be arranged to use floor space more efficiently. The existing Police Department firing range in the basement would be utilized for office and storage space. The central courtyard between the Council Chambers and the City Hall offices would be enclosed with a skylight to provide public seating and reception areas. Finally, the existing public restrooms adjoining the courtyard area would be -upgraded to meet current handicap requirements. Partition changes would occur: 1. In the basement: Police Department firing range, operations division, locker rooms; Planning Department and General Services - computer -room. 2. 1st Floor: Public Works and Building Department 3. 2nd Floor: Finance Department, City Manager and Personnel Department. Scheme B (Third Floor Addition): NEW 1•O59 SF - .ND FLA.. 1 ',T. PLR - ATRIUM NEW SKYLKIHT COUNCIL CHAMBER .SCHEME B bASEMENT POLICE FACILITY Additional usable floor space: 6,059 sq.ft. (49% increase). Estimated Cost: $1,740,511 A third floor level would be constructed above the existing two floors. A structural investigation would be required to -determine if the existing structural framework is adequate to support an additional level. Originally, the building was designed for a third floor, but building codes, especially seismic regulations, have changed significantly, since then. As in Scheme A, a new skylight over the courtyard would be installed, the first floor public restrooms upgraded and -the existing firing range in the basement remodeled for office and storage space. Partition changes would occur in the basement similar to Scheme A. On the first floor, partitions would be relocated to accomodate Finance and Personnel Departments. The 2nd Floor would be changed to accomodate the offices of the City Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney and Council Members. The added third floor would house the Planning, Building and Safety and Public Works*Departments and would extend over the existing Cpuncil Chambers. NEW 3410SF— Scheme C (3 -Level South Expansion) 2. Na 5T FSR. ATRIUM NEW SKYLKGHT COUNCIL CHAMBER SCHEME C bk. Em NT POLICE FACILITY Additional usable floor -space: 3,930 sq.ft. (32% increase). Estimated Cost: $1,405,827 Scheme C.would extend the basement, 1st floor and 2nd floor to approximately 19 feet to the South. As in Scheme A, the new skylight would be added and the first floor public restrooms upgraded. The partition changes in the basement would be similar. On the first floor the offices in the Building and Safety and Public Works Departments would be rearranged. On the 2nd floor Finance, Personnel, the City Clerk's and the City Manager's areas would also have their office space rearranged within the existing floor area. The departments would not be totally. relocated .in Scheme C. In Scheme C each department would, more or less, expand its existing space to the South. • 3. Comparison of Alternatives The analysis section is outlined as follows: 1. Scheme A 2. Scheme B 3. Scheme C The advantages and disadvantages of each alternative are discussed. 'The statements regarding disruption of City Hall functions.and flexibility for reorganizing City Hall departments are opinions of the architect. Staff agrees with the architect's opinions as stated below. 1. Scheme A: A. ADVANTAGES: I. Lowest Cost Scheme A is the lowest cost alternative compared to B. and C. Scheme A is $781,345 less than Scheme B and $446,661 less than Scheme C. II. MINIMUM OF DISRUPTION Scheme A would disrupt City Hall functions less than schemes B or C. No departments would 'have to be totally relocated. (There. would be some disruption, since. each department would undergo wall relocations and furniture changes.) DISADVANTAGES: I. Short Term Solution Scheme A does not allow for future growth; it merely uses existing space more efficiently. Space needed for future employees and storage isnot provided for. II. No Re -grouping Scheme A does not allow -for the grouping of Planning, Building • and Safety and Public, Works consistent with City Council's goal. 2. Scheme B: A. ADVANTAGES: I. Long Term Scheme B provides the necesssary space for City Hall's future requirements for staff offices,.public,service and storage. II. Greatest Flexibility: Scheme B offers the greatest flexilblity of the three options,. The departments could be reorganized and relocated by functions. B. DISADVANTAGES: I. Highest Cost Scheme B is the most costly of the three options. II. Relocation of Staff Since Scheme B calls for major reorganization of City Hall, some City Hall staff would need to be relocated during the construction period. ' 3. Scheme C: Scheme C falls between Schemes A and B in regard to advantages and disadvantages. I. Cost Scheme C has a cost which is less than Scheme B but more than Scheme A. Y TI. Disruption Scheme C'would cause less disruption than Scheme B but more than Scheme A. Departments would be expanded but not relocated. III.Short Term/Long Term Scheme C provides for less future growth than Scheme B but for more growth than Scheme A. IV. Flexibility Scheme C has less flexibility than Scheme B but more than Scheme A. Planning, Building and Safety and Public Works departments could not be consolidated into the same floor. 4. Fiscal Impact: CIP 88-609 was listed as a possible Capital Improvement Project for FY 88-89. The total estimated cost is listed as ranging from $250,000 to two million dollars. The project is presently unfunded. City Council has the option of making CIP 88-609 part of the 5 -year Capital Improvement Program. Summary: Design options A, B and C all encompass a major investment in time and money to provide for space requirements in. City Hall. Below is.a chart which shows total cost and construction time for each option. Design Construction- Inspection onstruction -Inspection System Furniture Contingency Total Cost: Approximate Construction Time Only (does not include design) Alternatives: 1. Drop the project. Respectfully submitted, %` i�%rituyGG✓ Scheme A $ 51,649 516,490 34,088 271,201 85,737 $959,166 6 months Brian Genglef Assistant Engineer Concur: Kevin B. No'rthc'aft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: This item is intended to full consideration Scheme B $ .102,259 1,022,591 . 67 ,.491 378,420 169,750 $1,740,511 12 months OAAAti An'""ony Antich Director of Pu•lic.Works Scheme C $ 87,550 . 875,496 57,783 239,666 145,332 $1,405,827 9 months Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Administrator to update the. Council on this continuing project. -Prior of these options, a guided tour for the Council will be Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council April 3, 1991 City Council Meeting of April 3,1991 SETTING OF JOINT MEETING WITH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Recommendation: That the City Council propose to the Chamber a joint meeting of the City Council and the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors at 7:30 a.m., on a. Thursday in June or July, 1991. Background: In the interest of pursuing the City Council's goal to "take a more active role with the Chamber", the City Council conducted a joint meeting with the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors on February 22, 1990. At that meeting, it was suggested that a meeting approximately every six months occur. The Mayor request- ed that we defer this meeting a little longer until more things were at the point that discussion with the Chamber again would be fruitful. On February 12, 1991, the Council requested the matter be brought back in April for setting a date. Analysis: Both the City Council and the Chamber of Commerce have recently met to update their respective bodies' goals and priorities. Ac- cordingly, it is an appropriate time to hold a joint meeting to develop action plans for implementing the goals of the respective bodies wherever they are compatible and consistent. The Chamber also is developing Council -requested information on the Fiesta's community benefits and costs, and would like to include that topic. That information should be available in June, 1991. The Board's regular meetings are on Thursday morningsat7:30 a.m. The joint meeting will be held in our Council Chambers and televised live on cable television. Kevin B. Northc-aft City Manager KBN/ld cc: Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Wes Bush 11a