Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/10/91/i/o Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. 'The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) • THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. ',When you stop and think about it, common sense is really special --not common." -Bob Pearcy AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, December 10, 1991 - Council Chambers, City Hall Closed Session - 6:30 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. MAYOR Kathleen Midstokke MAYOR PRO TEM Robert Essertier COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Sam Y. Edgerton Albert Wiemans CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch INTERIM CITY MANAGER Steve Wisniewski CITY. ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Cham- ber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. , PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 1; 9:5/71--). Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one _ minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) bef-ore the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There willbe no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered 1 490.) under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 26, 1991. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the November, 1991 monthly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated December 3, 1991 (e) (g) (j) Recommendation to adopt resolution -approving Final Map #22059 for a two -unit condominium located at 711 - 11th Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 2, 1991. Recommendation to appropriate funds for the purchase of South School. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated December 4, 1991. Recommendation to receive and file quarterly report on Goals Implementation Program. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated December 5, 1991. Recommendation to confirm Planning Commission inter- pretation and policy statement by minute order that check cashing business is not a permitted use in the C-3 zone. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 2, 1991. Recommendation to approve request from Vons to restripe the Plaza Hermosa parking lot to provide 30% compact parking in order to provide adequate parking to legalize pizza delivery service from inside store. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 2, 1991. Recommendation to approve renewal of lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch for use of Room C at the Community Center. Memorandum from Corr�munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 1, -1991. Recommendation to adopt a resolution of support for the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated December 2, 1991. Recommendation to adopt resolution to provide paratran- sit service as mandated by the Americans with Disabili- ties Act (ADA). Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated December 3, 1991. Recommendation to receive and file report on the Nation- al Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit status. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 3, 1991. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF CITY POLICY REGARDING A DRIVEWAY APPROACH WITHIN THE PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAY AT 760 MONTEREY BOULEVARD. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Direc- tor William Glickman dated November 19, 1991. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. RECONSIDERATION OF ACTION TAKEN ON AVIATION BOULEVARD/ PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONCERNS. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 3, 1991. 7. AVIATION BOULEVARD/OCEAN DRIVE CROSSWALK SAFETY_ISSUES. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 3, 1991. 8. 1990-91 COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT INCLUDING REPORT FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITORS. Memorandum from Finance Di- rector Viki Copeland dated December 4, 1991. 9. RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING RECONSTRUCTION OF STRAND BIKE- WAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated December 3, 1991. 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER (a) Review of purchasing and bidding procedures. Memorandum from Interim City Manager Steve Wisniewski dated Decem- ber 5, 1991. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) City Council Committee Assignments - December, 1991. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated Decem- ber 3, 1991. 12. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Edgerton for consideration of postponing the joint City Council/Planning Commission workshop meeting. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, November 26, 1991, at the hour of 7:40 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Kaija Dankers, Hermosa Valley School "Student of the Month" ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Midstokke Absent: None REQUEST BY COUNCILMEMBER WIEMANS for reconsideration of action taken on Aviation Boulevard/Pacific Coast Highway traffic concerns. City Attorney Vose stated that- the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, in Section 2-2.23, allowed reconsidera- tion only on the day of the action, but that any Coun- cilmember could ask to have an item rescheduled for a future meeting. Action: To direct staff to place this item on the next agenda for a rehearing. Motion Wiemans, second Creighton. So ordered. HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH. - Kaija Dankers Mayor Midstokke congratulated Kaija Dankers for being recognized as the Hermosa Valley School, "Student of the Month", for the month of November, 1991, and wished her success in her future endeavors. Dee Strange, former teacher, spoke of Miss Danker's accomplishments. CANVASS OF VOTES AND INSTALLATION OF OFFICERS - Election results and seating of new councilmembers. I. CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION - Approval of resolution cer- tifying the results of the election of November 5, 1991. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling, dated November 21, 1991, with resolution for adoption. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 91-5506, entitledd, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 5, 1991, CONSOLIDATED WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND GENERAL DISTRICT ELECTIONS, DE- CLARING THE RESULT AND OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW.' Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. II. PRESENTATION TO OUTGOING ELECTED OFFICIALS A. Leah Jeffries, representing Supervisor Dana, pres- ented a proclamation from the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors to outgoing Councilmember Charles Sheldon, and thanked outgoing Councilmember City Council Minutes -11-26-91- Page 7633 Roger Creighton for his service as he had expressed the desire to have no proclamations in his honor. B. Edie Webber, representing Assemblyman Felando, presented a proclamation to outgoing Councilmember Charles Sheldon, and thanked outgoing Councilmember Roger Creighton for his service as he had expressed the desire to have no proclamations in his honor. C. Mayor Midstokke presented a tile plaque to Council - member Sheldon and thanked him for his service to the City. Councilmember Sheldon thanked all who had supported him; thanked his friends, City staff and especially thanked his wife, Missy. He wished the new Coun- cilmembers well and suggested that they accept four projects to try to complete in the next four years. D. Mayor Midstokke thanked Councilmember Creighton for his service to the City and stated that in four years he had never been absent from a meeting. Councilmember Creighton thanked the Hermosa Beach electorate for the opportunity to serve. E. Outgoing Councilmembers Creighton and Sheldon left the dais. III. OATH OF OFFICE TO INCOMING OFFICIALS - CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION A. The oath of office was administered by Deputy City Clerk Valdes to City Clerk elect Elaine Doerfling, who then accepted the certificate of election. B. The oath of office was administered by City Clerk Doerfling to City Treasurer elect Gary Brutsch, who then accepted the certificate of election. C. The oath of office was administered by City.Clerk Doerfling to City Councilmember elect Robert Benz, who then accepted the certificate of election. D. The oath of office was administered by City Clerk Doerfling to City Councilmember elect Sam Y. Edger- ton, who then accepted the certificate of election. E. Mayor Midstokke welcomed the new Councilmembers to the dais and congratulated them on behalf of the council, she also complimented all who had partici- pated in the election. City Council Minutes 11-26-91J Page 7634 1) Councilmember Benz thanked those who had sup- ported him and said he would do his utmost to ful- fill his duties. 2) Councilmember Edgerton thanked everyone who had helped him, especially his wife, and said he was deeply honored to be elected. 3) City Treasurer Brutsch thanked everyone for their support. 4) City Clerk Doerfling thanked everyone for their support and expressed gratitude for their con- fidence in her. RECESS The meeting recessed at 8:10 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:41 P.M. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, announced that he will file a request with the County for a recount on Proposition "H", the City Council sponsored ballot proposition to rezone the Biltmore site 70% residential and 30% commercial and sell it, which passed by forty (40) votes; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, concerned with article in "The Breeze" showing Prospect Avenue as a street to be used to avoid traffic on the way to LAX, and expressed opposition to a pro- posed left turn signal at Prospect and Avia- tion; and, Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned about safety of residents and pedestrians on the Strand due to condition of the fence at the proposed Hotel site. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (j), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (f) Essertier and (j) Mayor Midstokke. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. At 8:45 P.M., Mayor Midstokke ordered that items 2, 3, and 4 be suspended until after the public hearing, item 5, could be heard. City Council Minutes 11-26-91 Page 7635 (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on November 12, 1991. (b) Action: To approve the minutes of the meeting of Novem- ber 12, 1991, as presented. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants No. 38883 and Nos. 39000 through 39146 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 39002, 39003, 39004, 39036, 39037, 39080, 39081, 39082, 39083, and 39105. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) (e) (f) Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the October, 1991 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. Action: To receive and file the October, 1991, finan- cial reports. Recommendation to receive and file 1st Quarter status report on Capital Improvement Program, FY 1991-1992. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated November 5, 1991. Action: To receive and file the 1st quarter status re- port on Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 1991-1992, which shows the progress of 27 projects totaling $3,009,839. Recommendation to approve formal agreement between the City and the School District to provide City funds for the purpose of maintaining landscaped areas at Hermosa Valley School. Memorandum from Community Resources Di- rector Mary Rooney dated November 19, 1991. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Proposed Action: To table the item for six months to see if the School Board changes its priorities in regard to its expenditures. Motion Essertier, second Benz. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Edgerton, Wiemans, and Mayor Midstokke. City Council Minutes 11-26-91 Page 7636 (g) (h) Action: To approve the Staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement between the City and the School District which would allocate $11,500 of City funds (payable on a monthly basis from the Public Works Department budget) to the District for the purpose of maintaining landscaped areas of Hermosa Valley School in exchange for its use as a recreation area during non -school hours. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered, noting the objection of Essertier. Recommendation to accept construction as complete for sanitary sewer improvements, Target Area 4, CIP 88-406. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated November 18, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) accept construction as complete for the Sanitary Sewer Improvements, Target area 4, CIP 88-406, con- structed by Colich & Sons at a cost of $1,441,657.98 for the replacement of existing pipe with new clay pipe for 7,281 lineal feet and the sliplining of existing pipe with polyethelene pipe for 4,516 feet -for a total rehabilitation of 11,797 lineal feet at 18 separate locations; 2) authorize the Mayor to sign the Notice of Comple- tion; and, 3) authorize staff to: a) release the retention payment of $144,165.80 to Colich & Sons 35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion (provided no stop notices or mechanics liens are received within that time period; and, b) release Colich & Sons from the Faithful Perfor- mance Bond and the Labor and Materials -Bond in the original amount of $1,587,648 for each bond after the Notice of Completion is recorded. Recommendation to approve in concept the relocation of the west end of Gould Terrace. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman, da ted November 19, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: 1) approve in concept the relocation of the west one hundred (100) feet of Gould Terrace; and, 2) vacate in concept the incorrect location of the west one hundred (100) feet of Gould Terrace as described in the easement, due to the fact that the street is not physically located within the record- ed street easement but rather is paved over private property. (i) Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment for the Acting General Services City Council Minutes 11--26-91- Page 7637 (j) V.n Director and one General Services Officer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated November 20, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation, due to the pending review of the organizational structure of the Parking Enforcement Division and staffing levels. Recommendation to award contract for downtown area main- tenance to Specialty Maintenance Co., Inc. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dat- ed November 19, 1991. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Interim Public Works Director Glickman responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Ken Handman - 620 Prospect Avenue, owner of Specialty Maintenance Co., who stated that most companies do not want to bid on the project because -it -entails so much hand work; Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, concerned that the Council make a decision whether or not to separate the bid before it is re -bid. Proposed Action: To shelve the issue for a while. Motion Benz. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Proposed Action: To re-evaluate the bid procedure, as there were companies in the area who did not receive the bid information proposal; to separate the bid --so that the VPD would bid for the cleaning of its lots and the City would bid for the cleaning of its streets; and to re -bid the proposal. Motion Benz. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To reject all bids and send the item back out to be re -bid. Motion Benz, second Mayor Midstokke. The motion carried unanimously. Action: To have the staff schedule a meeting with the City Council and the VPD as soon as possible and to di- rect staff to re -bid the proposal in the same form as the present bid. Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. So ordered. Action: To direct staff to place the present procedure for bidding on the consent calendar for Council review. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered. City Council Minutes 11-26-91- Page 7638 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES - None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. Items 1(f) and (j) were heard at this time, but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. DISCUSSION OF PRELIMINARY DRAFTS OF CITY'S SOURCE REDUC- TION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT RESULTING FROM AB 939. Memorandum from Building and Safety Director William Grove dated November 18, 1991. Building and Safety Director Grove presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. David Polis of Emcon Associates and Michael Huls of Resource Integration Systems gave a slide presentation regarding the State's requirements for solid waste source reduction and responded to Council questions. The public hearing was opened at 9:40 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, expressed concern that the costs were too high. The public hearing was closed at 9:43 P.M. Action: Mayor Midstokke, with the consensus of the Council, directed that staff re-evaluate the program to come up with a lower cost in order to comply, as she thought the City was close to compliance now, thanks to the resident's desire to recycle. She also directed staff to look at the funding source for a rate structure modification as an incentive and to obtain information from other cities to find the most cost effective method of compliance. Councilmember Edgerton suggested asking Browning Ferris to handle the volume computations rather than having the City do it alone. MUNICIPAL MATTERS - None 6. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER Interim City Manager Wisniewski reported that the annual Holiday Tree lighting ceremony would take place on Tues- day, December 3, 1991 at 5:30 P.M. near Loreto Plaza. City Council Minutes 11-26-91 Page 7639 7. (a) (b) (c) •., Community Resources Director Mary Rooney explained the Holiday events calendar. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL Vacancy - Civil Service Board - Unexpired term ending July 15, 1992. Action: To approve the staff recommendation No. 1: to appoint Michael D'Amico to fill the unexpired term on the Civil Service Board ending July 15, 1992. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered. Appointment of Council sub -committee for Beaches and Harbors contract negotiations. Continued from the meet- ing of November 12, 1991. Action: To decline to create a sub -committee and to direct staff to come directly to Council in open session in order for the public to be aware of the progress of the negotiations and the requests made by the County. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. Mayor Midstokke,- with --the consensus of the Council, di- rected staff to write to Supervisor Dana expressing the City's displeasure and to indicate that the City is un- willing to bear the cost of the County services when the entire County population use Hermosa beaches. Also, to encourage residents to write and complain to the County. Request from Planning Commission for joint meeting with the City Council. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated November 18, 1991. Action: Mayor Midstokke, with the consensus- of the Council, approved December 12, 1991, at 7:30 P.M., as the date of a joint workshop meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss: 1) permitted uses in the Open Space zone; 2) landscape plan for the Greenbelt; 3) annual joint meeting for City Council., School._ Dis- trict, and Planning Commission; 4) Beach Drive parking; and, 5) Greenbelt parking. 8. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Wiemans expressed concern that the trash pick-up was after the street sweeper had gone through and therefore the streets did not look clean. He would like some coordination so that the streets were swept after the trash was picked up. Mayor Midstokke directed staff to investigate the matter and to move the unscheduled item regarding the street City Council Minutes 11-26-91 Page 7640 sweeping map and time schedule on the future agenda to a date specific. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, November 26, 1991 at the hour of 11:30 P.M. to the Regular Meeting to be held on Tuesday, December 10, 1991 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 11-26-91 Page 7641 FINANCE -SEA -140 Tirt: 14.07:06 PA', VENDOR NAME P:7SCR IP T 1!3N PHI EM=`I OYEES RETIREMENT SYS. , .{'.P.- NTECc T 91 �i PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. F'.'-T1P__NT/OCT 91 . - -. H ru3 EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. • :TrrEiv-.uf/OCT 91 E! -LJ EL2 RETIREMENT. SYS. P:ETIREMENT: OC T VI .. H :'i'3 EMPLOYEES .... RETIREMENT/OGT i1 PUS EMPLOYEES PETIRE NE=WT/OCT • H PUB EMPLOYEES __R'_TIREMENT/OCT PUB EMPLOYEES RET IREtTENT/Of:T RETIREMENT SYS. 91 E' ... RETIREMENT SYS. 91 RETTRUI NT SYS. 91. . RETIREMENT SYS. ?1 H .. F UB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREME1-JT/OCT 91 • PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. d_ .RETIREMENT/OCT 91 H PUH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/OCT 91 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. • RETIREMENT/OCT 91 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/OCT 91 ***' VENCfJR TOTAL CT1Y OF HERMO1A BEACH DEMAND LIST FOP 11/27{91 VNT) # ACCOUNT NUMBER , TRN # AMOUNT D.4FE INVC PROJ .tf ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00544 $95,889.09 11/25/91 RETIREMENT .. ./RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00545 .11/25/91 RETIREMENT 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00161 11/25/91 STREET LIGHTING 00026 109-400--3301-4180 00031 11/25/91 VEH PKG DIST. 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00164 11/25/91. PARKING ENF 00026 145-400-3401-4180 00137 11/25/91 DIAL.. A RIDE - $98, 280. 90CR /RETIREMENT $1,128.63 /RETIREMENT $179. 70 /RETIREMENT $4,971.85 /RETIREMENT - $209. 21 /RETIREMENT 00026 145-400-3402-4160 00137 $72.87 _11/25/91 ESE _...._.._...... /RETIREMENT._..._... 00026 145-400-3403.41.80 00084 $19.26 . 11/25/91 . . BUS PASS SUBSDY /RETIREMENT 00026 145-400-3408-4180 00008 - $16. 48 11/25/91.---- -. -. ... ._ COMMUTER XPRESS - /RETIREMENT--_. - 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00136 11//71 _ CROSSING GUARD 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00162 11/25191 --.....--- _ __..-. -- SEWER/ST . DRAIN 00026 170-400-2103-4180 00037 11/25/91 SPEC TNVESTGTNS 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00086 11/25/91-._ LIABILITY INS 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00086 11/25/91 WORKERS COMP $136. 52 /RETIREMENT - $949.80 /RETIREMENT- $4,685.35 RETIREMENT-. $4,685.35 /RETIREMENT 4290. 98 -/RETIREMENT... $400. 05 /RETTRF.MENT *****************.a •war•****fir****** n***n *on ********ns* --a *:I * u * n******•n***** ' STEVE*WISNIEWSKI SPEC INVESTIGATION FUNDS ,.'1X. 04156 11/21/91 $10, 666. E9 170-400-2103-432.2 00041 $50,000.00 :-ECC TNVFSTGTNS /UNCLASSIFIED PARE 0001 UAW 11/27/91 INV/REF PO tr CHK N ' AMOUNT 1..;!JZ11C DATE EXP $0. CO 40. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 10.00 $0.00 39148 11/27/91 39148 11/27/91 39148 11/27/91 I- I i o . I I 39148 11:27/91 ,'''1 .) 39148 11/27/91 39148 11/27/91 39148 $0.00 11/27/91 $0. 00 $0. 00 39148 11/27/91 39148 1' 11/27/91 39148 $0.00 11/27/91 39146 - $0. 00---- 11/27/91 3?148 $0.00 11/27/91 39148 - $0. 00 -11/27/91 $0. 00 03172 $0. 00 39148 11/27/91 J J 39147 11/.7:91 ' 1 {j I. '0 lb e 14. • e. ,r , '`. � -- • • �i u --i *** VENDOR TOTAL **°*********°*******°°°***°*********************°**°****°**°*****°** F'�� � | � --- �1 ***VENDOR ~ =r""" TOTAL L **° *°°°°°*°* *****� °�°******* ****** *** **./ ** °*°************ * *** * ****|°*** * ` FIwAmas-c'A240 TIME 14:07:06 VENDOR NAMEu'isrnIPrIow PAY CITY oF *snnooA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/27/91 . VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN w AMOUNT I wv/nsr DATE INVC PROJ w ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT *** VENDOR TOTAL *******°*****a*a°a*°°***°******************************************* n A * E rcop`IEe 02744 • MISC.. u*Anusarwovt91_xnvoo--x1/19/91 n A & E TROPHIES 02744 _MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91- .10435- 11/19/91. *** VENDOR 001-400-1101-4319 00119 -CITY COUNCIL 001-400-4601-4308 00627 ` $50,000.00 $6p, 666.89 --- - $25.32 /SPECIAL *1aa71 /peoonAm-mAtsnIAua TOTAL **°**********°*****yo************************°****°**°*°**°********* *192.03 y ADVANCED ELECTRONICSCHANGE RADIO FREQUENCIES 43850-- - PO UNENC PAGE DATE oop � ` ' CHK w DATE EXP 0409/10435 00112 39151 ' -*o. 00 .11/27/91 10409/10435 00112 39151 ° 0935 001-400'2201-4309 01190 *150.00 43850 11293 39152 ' 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************"«°****«***************************° $150.00 R - • J AMERICAN STYLE FOODS 0 . 00857 ooz-oon-o1o1-4006 w1nns $135.00 aoa *135.00 6706 00115 39153 • n c*nIa*o^nsLA 04391 001-e10-0000-2110 04603 *50.00 '--- --'-- '-^''^ -/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 4- ��/� ��j�� *** vstuaos TOTAL **********°°******,*°*o*****°*****°°*****°*****°**^**a°^"p***°****** — $50. 00 n aERI*mpnImrzNG SERVICE, INC. 02664 001-400-4201-4305 00727 $53.04 --BLDG DEPARTMENT FORMS -- 3014------11/07/91 /OFFICE- OPER SUPPLIES . .. " ` ° 28255 03282 39154 ^' ~• 3014 02281 - ------$53;04-11/o7/p1 IS^/m' / 04390 001-210-0000-2110 04602 $500.00 . 28989 03283 ---'---'oAmAGs DEPOSIT nspowm------ 2a9ap----11/e1/px'- ' - ----• ' --- - /DEPOSITS/WORK ouAnAwYEs---' ----- $0.00 � . � **� VENDOR TOTAL ************************�»*********°*°°°v*°*** * �%��� '* **°*************�*** *�oo�ou � � • ^ . `.'� ° 39156 —1z/o7/p1 .. -^ � mAnv*oxoracx, CITY TREASURER 0e016 001-400-1101-4305 00401 $33 .94 03265 39158 —11/a7/p1- � ° ,, � 4, ! FINANCE-SFA340 TIH 14.(7-,)6 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DLMAND LIST FOR 11/27/91 VENDOR NAME nEf3CRIPTION VND # -ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVCPROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF PAGE 0003 DATE 11/27/91 PO 0 CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE Exr R - GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1203-4201 00834 $38.85 0385 39158 REImn PETTY CASH/NOV.91-____________11/25191_ __PERSONNEL_ _____/CONTRACT .SERVICE/PRIVAT__________ $0.00____11-,Z7//1 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1206-4305 00523 $0.35 C3285 39158 .. __REIM. PETTY CASN/NOV 91 _ 11/25/91 DATA PROCESSING -/OFFICE -OPER -SUPPLIES----- ---- -.$0.00--- 11/27/91- , R GARY*ERUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2101-4305 01637 $22.85 03285 39158 __REIM PETTY.CASH/POV 91____ ..._ 11/25/91_____ _________ POLICE_____________/OFFICE-OPER_SUPPLIES------- ------$0-00. -11/27/91- GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER E...1M PETTY CASH/NOV_91_,___ R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER KEINE.PETTY CASH/NOV 91. R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REIMS.PETTY CASH/NOV 91 GARY46RUTSCH, CITY TREASURER __REIMIT_PEUY_CASH/NOV 91 GARY*8RUTSCH, CITY TREASURER .REIMB_PETTY.CASN/NOV 91 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER _REINB_PET_TY_CASHINOV 91 R GARY*ERUTSCH, CITY TREASURER R GARY*DRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER tt' io; 4 11; " 4S, 02016 001-400-2101-4311 II/25/91 -POLICE 02016 001-400-2101-4316 11/25/91- -POLICE 01289 $38. 17 _/AUTO-MAINTENANCE-________ .03285 39158 _______ $0. - .11/27/91-- 00801 $25.90 03285 39158 ------/TRAINING - --------- $0. 00-41/27/91- 02016 001-400-2201-4305 00512 $31.18 03285 39158 11/25/91 FIRE /OFFICE -OPER -SUPPLIES- - $0.-00 -11/27/91.- 02016 001-400-3104-4309 100765 $20.02 03285 39158 11/25/91 _______TRAFFIC-SAFETY---/MALN-TENANCE- MATERIALS------- - CO- -1-1 /27/91-- 02016 001-400-4101-4305 '00588 $10.80 .11/25/91.- PLANNING ICE- OPER - SUPPLIES - - • - - 02016 001-400-4101-4316 00238 $20.00 .11/25/91--- PLANN INC-- /TRAINING 02016 001-400-4102-4305 00142 $5. 68 11/25/91 --- PLANNING -COMM --/OFF ICE -OPER SUPPLIES -- - 02016 11/25L91 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER -REIMB FZTTY-CASH/NOV. GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER REI -1B PETTY.CASH/NOV-91_ R'GARY*BRUTSCH.-CITY TREASURR 1._REINB-PETTY CASH/NOV .91-.- ------. R GARYUTSCH. CITY TREASURER REIMB_PETTY_CASN/NOV 91 • t An's • . , V44. 4 • • ,•• • • :4, 001-400-4601-4302 00171 $10.82 COMM RESOURCES-JADVERIISING 02016 001-400-4601-4305 01008 *2.69 11/25/91 -COMM RESOURCES--/OFFICE-OPER SUPPLIES- -- 02016 001-400-4601-4308 00628 $26.75 11/25/91- _COMM RESOURCES --/PROGRAM. MATERIALS 02016 109-400-3301-4305 11/25/91-- VEH PKG 03285 39158 $0.00-11/27/91- 1!2 11 3.' 03285 39158 - 03265 39158 ." - $0. 00--- 1-11'2 ir"7 03285 39158 $0.- CO --41/27/91- 03285 39158 5' --$0.00---11/27/91 03285 39158 00026 $1.74 • DIST /OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES -- 02016 110-400-3302-4305 00846 \ $21.00 11/25p71 PARKING-ENF )0EF4CE-OPER SUPPLIES „ . • $0.00- ---/1/27/91 03205 39158 -- • $0.00 ---11 / 27/91 032.85 39158 $0,00.---11427/91- fib 441 I • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ri.N.4".:E-Sr4340 BLW.ND LIST PA6E 00(14 TIM: 14..... -'• FOR 11/2//71 . DATE 11/2//01 ' . •,', , VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO it Cr -v. ,A.2-IPTION DATE INVC PROJ It ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE ErP • 1 H, ____________ _ ________ - -- •- _ _ . --- -_ ----- . •:.:- • V:NDOR TOTAL 4************************* $310. 74 • C. M. B. 04308 001-400-1207-4316 000071 $40.00, RF.G/FEHSKENS/LAWPEN0E 11/21/91- BUS LICENSE ---/TRAINING-------- ','MOOR TOTAL **,1-0,,,i,-,4.f*******41.11.**41.441-#*4-,,.4***4,4-*.,44*-4.**#4*-1-4E-#*ititif*.N $40.00 4 CA STATE UNIV DOMINGUEZ HILLS 00412 001-400-1202-4316 00397 $313.00 SPRING TUITION/v.- mOHLEP 11/26/91, • FINANCE -ADMIN. /TRAINING --1 * ** vrN019 4************************4141.41—****##*###44*4141******4******41.4#41 $313 00 4 n 11092 39159 I" • ,4 • i" 0275'9 31.60 I") • %JO. 00 ---•- 11/27/91 CJ J R MON.' ..:EAN*cED4R 03159 001-400-4601-4201 01124 $378.00 • 03591 39161 ko CLASS INSTRUCTOR 11/19/91--- - COMM RESOURCES. /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT.----- - $0.00 -• *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************************************** $378. 00 R . $36. 23 CENT INELA SO. BAY VISA 03353 001-400-1203-4201 100835 , 03047 39167 OCT EXPEN:30..• i -;i A 1.1 Ct400- -11/13/91- PERSONNEL /CONTRACT- SERVICE/PR I VAT • •0. 00 - -11/27/91.- 4**, VENDOR TOTAL ****************4*4***************A****************************** $36. 23 13 1 I 14, , P CONNECTING POINT LEASING 03617 001-400-2101-4201 00907 $489.57 3200454 00051 39163 ,, . COM0UTER RENT/NOV 91 .....00454--....--11/17/91 pnLicE- -/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT- $0.00 11/27/91- - R I 1 CONNECTING POINT LEASING 03617 001-400-2201-4201 00262 $159.40 3200454 00051 39163 - 00WUTER-RENT/NOV-91 00454-- 11/17/9-1--------------FIRE--.--------------/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT- -------- $0,-00--- 1 1/27/9t- .2.i• , *** VENDOR TOTAL******************4************************************************* ; $1,128.54' .9L , 744, ! • -11 - y.. • R STEVEN*0RECY -9 . .. 04012, .--11/21-4191 001-210-0000-2110 04604 \ $1,600.00 WORK -GUARANTEE -REFUND- S-44 /DEPOSITS/WORK-GUARAN1EE- . , 7 rs.. • 5. ..., R CONNECTING POINT LEASING 03617 001-400-2701-4201 00034 1-330.18 3200454 00051 39163 .- -- --COMPUTER RENT/NOV 91 00454-- 11/17/91- -- - - CIVIL DEFENSE --/CONTRACTSERVICE/PRIVAT- - -- -$0.00--11/27/91 .- P CONNECTING POINT LEASING 7 03617 170-400-2103-4201 00100 $159.39 3200454 00051 39.163 COMPUTER RENT/NOV-91---7---00454------11/17/91 - SPEC -INVESTGTNS--/CONTRAC-F- SERVICE/PRIVAT -- ----VI-00- —14/27/91-- , 1 9344 03284 39164 ' -$0,00-41/27/91-- / 4 15/ • • ..... • • , ;•••,..4.0! • 40. •,. • • o' 1 ; Ar * . ; ** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************************************** . . 4 •.1 f R STEVE*FILLMAN 03169 001-400-4601-4201 01123 $514.50 FALL.. CLASS INSTRUCTOR ..' 1 INANCE-SPA240 TIME 14:07:06 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/27/91 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # 'ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD 1 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT *** 12,NoOli TOTAL ******************************************************************** • ,JIM*CUBBERLEY _ ,FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR PACE 0005 DATE 11/27/91' P0# CHK UNENC DATE EXP $1, 600.00 7 02971 001-400-4601-4201 01121 $196.00 03593 39165 . il 11/20/91 .COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT. • $0.00---41/27/91-- ,s *** VENDOR TOTAL: Iliii**14********31-41*-11—***41-4**41.4-***4*************######*########*41—****# R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY .COPIER.TONER/IBM $196. 00 14 02840 001-400-1208-4305 00986 $26922 013844633 02746 39166 m 11/06/91 GEN APPROP /OFFICE_OPER SUPPLIES. *0-00--11/27/91—'2. *.-* VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $269.22 • EASTMAN, INC. __MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 02514 001-400-1208-4305 00987 $290.32 01125 39167 - _11/07/91_ GEN APPROP______./OFFICE-OPER SUPPLIES-- ------ f $290. 32 t• • *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************4************************************************* 3514.50 11/13/91_ -______-_-- COMM RESOURCES--/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT__ !. • R • GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFCRS ASSOC 00059 001-400-1202-4201 00290 $375.00 CAFR REVIEW.FEE/FY 90-71.. ... 11/27/91 . FINANCE ADMIN- ./CONTRACT-SERVICE/FRIVAT-. L._____*** vp;rsinn8 TOTAL ******************************************************************* 1 • , -1! : - . „ 03583 39168 ------. 30.00 • 11/27/91-.. V-, R $375. 00 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED .FAX.BILLING/NOV 91 .......-6186 2, .13 27 2,1 31 37 02737 39169 11/:-Y7/71 - $375. 00 -- 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00453 $1.32 372-6186 01133 39171 .-CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE.--- ---:.--- - • - -. - $0.00--11/27/91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00471 $0.24 FAX BILLING/110V.91 -686 11/19/91 CITY -TREASURER -/TELEPHONE R GTE CALIFORNIA,INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1201-4204 00507 $0.73 ----FAX BILLING/NOV 91 . . -- -6186------11/19/91-- - -- --- CITY MANAGER ---/TELEPHONE i R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED ;.' 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00519 \ $14.08 FAX-BILLING/NOV-91- -,6184 -11/19/91— FINANCE-ADMIN----.4ELEPHONE • • — ••• ,/!•' V • " ' 42 372-6186 01133 39171 $0.00---11/27/91- 372-6166 01133 39171 $0.00-11/27/91 372-6186 01133 39171 $0,00-11/27/94- 1/ y FINANCE-SFA340 TIM'; 14:07:05 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/27/91 ii GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED __._._.FAX.BILLING/NOV 91.-. .---_.-6186. R R R ii GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATE_[? FAX BILLTN=/NO'V 91 -- - - -- -6186 --- GTE CALIFORNIA, .... _ TELE CHARGES/NOV GTE CALIFORNIA, FAX BILLING/NOV GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE.CHARGES/NOV GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV INCORPORATED 91 INCORPORATED 91 -. . --6186 INCORPORATED 91- .. INCORPORATED 91 4: i R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED --_---.---.--FAX •B ILLING/NOV-91------.- -6186 i ;-a VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INV/REF 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00523 $6.81 PERSONNEL--------1TELEPHONE-------=•--- 00015 11/19/91 001-400-1206-4304 00414 $2.53 DATA PROCESSING --/TELEPHONE-• - 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00415 $46.97 11/26/91 -- -- - --_ - DATA PROCESSING -/TELEPHONE --- ------- 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00336 $0.42 11/19/91 --. - BUS LICENSE. • ---/TELEPHONE - --- 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00926 $323.35 -11/26/91 -- POLICE- 00015 OLICE-. 00015 001-400-2201-4304 11/26/91 FIRE ----/TELEPHONE------- 00387 $62.94 /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00523 lit 4* R LORI*H1GGINS ---- FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED ---- FAX BILLING/NOV 91 -- --------6186 11/19/91 -PLANNING-- 00015 C01-400-4201-4304 00472 11/19/91 ------- --- ----BUILDING ; - - R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 ------FAX BILLING/NOV-.91-- •----6186-----.-11/19/91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 • TELE CHARGES/NOV 91 --- . - ------11/26/91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED ' FAX-BILLING/NOV-91- -6186 001-400-4202-4304 00541 PUB WKS -ADMIN - 001 -400-4202-4304 00542 PUB WKS ADMIN 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00610 11/19/91--------------- COMM RESOURCES R GTE' CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 ------FAX-BILLING/NOV 91 ----- --- -618/,-----11/19/91-- 110-400-3302-4304 00521 PARKING ENE.-- --- $7. 72 /TELEPHONE $2.24 /TELEPHONE $16.32 --/-TELEPHONE - - $48. 70 /TELEPHONE- $4.16 TELEPHONE- $4.16 -/TELEPHONE ---- $3. 82 -/TELEPHONE----- PAGE 0006 DATE 11/27/91 PO AMOUNT UNENC 372-6186 01133 372-6186 01133 # CHK # 2 DATE EXP 9 $0.00 01131 ---------- $0-00 s 39171 11/27/%1 12 39171 -11/77/91- 39171 11/"'.7/91- 39171 --11/27/91- 372-6186 01133 39171 - $0. 00--- 11/27/91- ••_) 1/27/91 -- JJ J w N V 01131 39171 -. -- 40.00-11/27/91'r. 01131 39171 $0.00 11/27/91 '"I J 372-6186 01133 39171 " $0.00 ---11/27/91- r. 372-6166 01133 39171 $0.00 -11/27/91 372-6186 01133 39171 . $0. 00----11/27/91- 01131 39171 $0.00-----11/27/91- 372-6186 01133 39171 ----$0.00---11/27/91 372-6186 01133 - - -- • - $0.00- *** VENDOR TOTAL?+*******L**+***a•***•w**a**+t?r*********• ******************************* $542.35 R JANICE*GUERRERO - - -- FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 39171 11/27/91 04331 001-400-4601-4201 01116 $112.00 03600 39172 ---11/20/91-- COMM RESOURCES ---/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT--- ------ $O.-QO---11/27/91 . *** VENDOR TOTAL'xt+**+r***•s•*++x*•n****3r*++*•a*#***** **++*****:a#rt•»rr*****++*ar+r**•!r*********,**** $112.00 03404 001-400-4601-4201 01115 $577.50 03598 39173 11/19/91 ----- ----COMM RESOURCES --/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT------- --- $0.00 -11/27/91 J 0 0 .4 J t i • FIN.+t.fCE-SFA340 1'It1_ 14:0706 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/27/91 PAY VL NI?OR NAME DESCRIPTION VND # • ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF DATE INVC PROJ 1t ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL*********»******************?r***: #- *********** **********#***•x**•n*** R R R R IN;JLEW OD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT.OFFERED __...._ IN;:LEW70D WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT TAKEN INGLE_WOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC...CHARGES/NOV _91 $577. 50 PAGE 0007 DATE 11/27/91 PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP lI 02458 001-202-0000-2021 00103 $9.63 .11/15/91-____... ._.. DISCOUNTS OFFERED 02458 001-202-0000-2022 00103 $9.63CR --.----11/15/91--__-.-.----. .....--------.------ --/DISCOUNTS_TAKEN 02458 001-400-4204-4309 02165 $413.82 11/15!.91.__ __..... _-._.. BLDG MAINT-----___!MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS-----. __ 01174 $0.00. 39174 11/27/91 19 01174 39174 I, 4' y -- $0..00__11/27/91 01174 39174 INGLE_WOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 105-400-2601-4309 00757 $59.10 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 11/15/91.__........__.__...STREET LIGHTING../MAINTENANCE-MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL *********************************** k**** a*********** a*************** $472. 92 R JET DELIVERY. INC. 00281 001-400-1202-4201 100291 $28.75 ___._.__SELIVERY_-SERV/EY.91�4UDIT_.82810-L11i5LQ� FINANCE-ADMIN--/CONTRAC-T-SERVICE/PRIVAT-. *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************a•***************#*********** $28.75 3TUART*LEVCHENKO CLASS _INSTRUCTOR *** VENDOR 'TOTAL -$0,00---11/27/9t- 8 $0.-00--11/27/91- 01174 39174 $0.00-11/27/91-- e6 0.00-11/27/91- 8 19 20 21 22 eG 27 82810 02749 39175 N 04252 001-400-4601-4201 01117 $367.50 03599 39176 11 /20191______ _._-______ _._._ CCJMM . RESOURCES -/CONTRACT - SERVICE/PRI VAT --- $0. 00 --11 /27/91 - ******a*********************n*************************************** R ANTHONY*LINT'iERMAN 1 - CITE PMT REFUND _. 7447.5 04389 110-300-0000-3302 11/"1121 $367. 50 42962 $92.00 973115/974475 --.COURT-FINES/PARKING-- .. *** VENDOR TOTAL***x*******n-******************#a***+*********n********************* 0.5„.� 1J b. -" R LINDA*LOCKS FALL_ CLASS_. INSTRUCTOR $92. 00 02832 001-400-4601-4201 01118 $416.50 11/20/ -91 ------.-_.-COMM RESOURCES --/CONTRACT- SERVICE/PRIVAT- - $0.-00--11/27/91-- J. y 02757 39177 I S $0.-00-11/27/91- 5, 03701 39178 I, , y *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************+r***n***********+r*****************±+***#* : R LOS ANGELES CO MARSHALLS' OFF. $416. 50 03849 001-400-2101-4305 01636 \ $40.00 11091 39179 SMALL_ CLAIMS_FILING-FEES 11/19r:191.-- POLICE ---.OFFICE-OPER-SUPPLIES $0.00-11/27/91 rej 14 J 6 • ::.` - 1 • • TIM 14:07:06 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0008 FOR 11/27/91 DATE 11/27/91 ' VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO it CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP LOS ANGELES CO MARSHALLS' OFF. 03849 001-400-4202-4305 00646 $100.00 . SMALL.CLAIMS FILING. FEES 11/19/91 PUB WKS -ADMIN --/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES •----- VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R MAC WAREHOUSE 03810 001-400-2101-4305 01638 COMPUTER REPAIR /PFSL ICE11645.••• __-- 11/13/91.--. - • • • - POLICE $140. 00 11091 39179 • $0.0.0 - 11/27/01 7 61 $248.00 A1811645 03157 39180 ' --------/OFFICE-OPEr SUPPLIES-- - •$248.00---41/27/91- **it VFNOUR TOTAL ******************************************************************** . • . R MARX PROTHERS SEMI-ANNUAL INSPECTIONS *** VENDOR TOTAL $248. 00 03183 001-400-4204-4321 00611 $150.00 • F111137 03613 39181 11137 ----.--11f21/91 - BLDG MAINT - /BUILDING SAFETY/SECUR IT • $150.00. 11/27/91- - 1..267 ***************************************41**************************** c IR ENNETH A. *MEERSAND --LEGAL-SERV/SEP-91. R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND t.j • - - - ----LEGAL. =1V/OCT $150. 00 04138 001--400-2101-4201 00904 32,800.00 11/14/-9-1- POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVAT 04138 001-400-2101-4201 00905 35,600.00 1/14/91-- --•- ---- POLICE ------/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** 38,400.00 l'• ' , L „... :-..i t, 4 : , t• ' A! " R PACIFIC FIBRE & t -1 I R PACIFIC FIBRE & ROPE CO. INC. DISCOUNT -TAKEN -- •- - - -91;588 • R & ;INC. 5 PACIFIC FIBRE ROPE CO.. 0067 * * * R MONTEREY PLAZA HOTEL 03149 001-400-1206-4317 00082 $160..f;0 --HOTEL-ADVANCE/ft STURGES-TR394 --II/27/71- - - DATA PROCESSING /CONFERENCE EXPENSE ---- - I ******************************************************************** VENDOR TOTAL ROPE CO.. INC. 00675 $160. 60 001-202-0000-2021 03170 39182 $0.00---11/27/91- 03174 39182 $0.00---11/27/91 TR394 00394 39183 ---- $0.00 -11/27/91 J 0 14 211 1"1 11 4: I I 00101 $0.81 , 91588 03588 39184 -DISCOUNTS OFFERED ------ - $0.00---11/27/91- 00675 001-202-0000-2022 00101 $0.81CR 91588 03588 39184 11/22/91 -/DISCOUNTS-TAKEN---------- -------$000---11/27/91 001-400-4601-4308 00630 $80.38 0!:;6,'.--:- ---- NYLON POPE/COMM RES PROG 91588------11/22/91------ ----- COMM RESOURCES --/PROGRAM MATERIALS . .i. ir.,..1. • •.,:.1-, "7."; .. *** VENDOR ToTAL ******************************************************************** RADIO SHACK 01429 001-400-2201-4305 . -MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 ----69412 •--- -.11/20/91 -- FIRE- $80. 38 ....' 91588 03588 39184 $81.19 -11/27/91 • 00513 $34.59 69412 01155 39185 ----------/OFFICE-OPER SUPPLIES - $0. 00----11/27/91 661 ••0 ' • 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 14:07:06 PAGE 0009 FOR 11/27/91 • DATE 11/27/91' - PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC: .,.PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** * * * $34. 59 R EARRY*REED 03991 001-400-4601-4201 01122 $18/.00 03592 39186 ..FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR _. _COMM RESOURCES--/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00-- 11/27/91 - VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $189. 00 ! ' R DWAIN*ROGUE 02859 001-400-4601-4201 01120 $218.40 03594 39187 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR _11/20/91 COMM RESOURCES ___/CONTRACT_SERVICE/PRIVAT-__ 1/27/91,__ *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $218. 40 6 10 I I Id, :4 19 2,7 2,1 . . .... , R S & J SALES 02500 001-400-2101-4201 00906 $2,710.25 10854 03124 39188 2t BATTERIES/DISPATCH10854____11/06/91 _ _ _ _ . POLICE “ • ,!. /CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT- .- $2,682.50-11/27/91 . ..... *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************41 -****************************************44********** $2, 710. 25 - . fi, • ', ... . *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** • $30.00 14 • ::. ;: .. l• I . I . O !!' ,:'... ..,! • ..;7! RI ..! v, • SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00113 $1,321.00 57962 03316 .., ...k ___BUS PASS SALES/OCT_91_____ 57962 11/16/91 BUS PASS SUBSDY-/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 39191 $0.00---11/27/91 0.:41..., I. :. *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $1,321.00 ..,, .... , . , SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND .0, j...• q ''‘• ., 1. 03882 001-400-1121-4323 00164 $230.00 91HER11C 0117839192 ../ -41n...1.'E..... ._ ..... ___.1 MISC_ CHARGES/NOV 91 - — ER11C11/19/91 — • ;'; .--CITY CLERK -----/PUBLIC NOTICING--- L. - -- --- $0.00---11/27/91-61. ' : R '" SOUTH BAY NOTICING AND •' 03822 001-400-4101-4201 00124 \ $920.0091HER118 01178 39192 MISC_ CHARGES/N0V-91Ri1B- 11/21%91 PLANNING )CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00---11/27/91- .-- - •••d ?...;.. 1 , • ,:. 1 _ R S.C.C.A. 04387 001-400-2101-4316 100800 $30.00 02661 39189 SEMINARREG/J. BRIAN 11/20/91- POLICE- /TRAINING 0. $0.00.-7 11/27/91 111 •- •_ 1.4 R G. SCOTT*SMITH 03377 001-400-4601-4201 01119 $402.60 FALL.CLASS INSTRUCTOR__ -----11/20/91— ----COMM RESOURCES--/CONTRACT-SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOrAL ******************************************************************** $402. 50 03597 39190 $0.00--11/27/91- • .. GI A00 4. I1 • ` . . FI r/mc 14.07:,.Th CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 11/27/91 _ PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN w AMOUNT INV/REF **v VENDOR TOTAL ***********************************************************°******** *1.150.00 PAGE 0010 DATE 11/27/91 po* oHKw AMOUNT uwswo DATE EXP |` 0 SOUTHERN CAL. TREE & LANDSCAPE 03416 001-400-3101-4201 00091 $1,100 .00 oc1112-16 02976 39193 *** VENDOR TorAL °*°Y°*+»**********°**********************************°************** - -__ L / R aousseenS ^ HERB . TLZNNIS TOURNEY T-SHIRTS 03480 001-400-4601-4308 00629 *397.26 11/12/91 - COMM RESOURCES-- /PROGRAM MATERIALS-- --- *"* VENDOR TOTAL **°*°* ****»******°************************************ m397.2e n MARoUcnIre*SrunGsS PER DIEN ADVANCE 00620 001-400-1206-4317 00081 w130.00 -TR394 11/27/91 DATA PROCESSING /CONFERENCE EXPENSE-- - *** VENDOR TOTAL ************°********************************************4********** '` n TASERTRON 0*249 001 -400-2101-4309 - ou*ar $201.02 *** VENDOR TOTAL *************************************************°****************** 4 03551 39194 re394 00394 39195 n TODD PIPE & SUPPLY n TODD PIPE 14 SUPPLY TODD PIPE u SUPPLY o`mnoea/wnv•p1 00124 001 -202-0000-2021 n 00102 $2.11 - - --DISCOUNTS OFFERED 3362 03147 22210/15428 39196 8207.43- 11/27/91 ',: � ., `^ 18 = • " " • 39197 eo.00---- 11/27/91 00124 001-202-0000-2022 00102 $e.11on 22210/15428 01168 3919715428 11/15191 /DISCOUNTS -TAKEN------ 00-11/27/91- � � -e � . w^ � 4: 00124 001-400-6101-4309 01139 $10' 3.78 22210/15428 01166 39197 �-� -----1542o----'11/1n/91'--- -' -' PARKS -/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS-.• - --- $0.00-41/27/91. °** VENDOR TOTAL °**°w**********o** w****°o*****°*°»******°***v********y°******** . g GWENNA*TONCRE 04386 110-300-0000-3302 42963 $20 .00 25375 -DAILY PKG PERMIT -REFUND- 25375- .*** VENDOR TOTAL { ° **v°**°***°*************4***********°************°*************�**** *om�om ` /. ,.703368 001-400-4601-4201 01114 ���� 03590 39199 . --^"^~,`^--------COMMr�-nx__-*c-�sEnvzcs/pnIv*7------ -*o.00-11/a7/91 `,^.' `� ,�-'FALL-oLAss•ImsTnucToe 4- ` y './ � � . j", ` et FINANCE-orAnoo TIME 14:07:06 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 FOR 11/27/91 DATE 11/27/91 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER rnw � AMOUNT INV/REF PO � CHK # .---.,.-'-. �� --_' '— ' ~~~~. `""~"=, ,.. = ~^"^,'^= DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP - '- ' !| ~/.i °°* vcwonn rorm' °**°********°*°**°�***°******�**°****°***°*****°*°*�*************°** $662 .00 *°* p*v CODE rorAL *°°*******°°******************°°****°****************°*******°**** *27.219.94 C ` . . / . =~ I !^| i •- *** °** rnrAL WARRANTS ,***** **.*' ' ''''''''--'~.~~_._~_~*.**°°°°°°°°°°°°** $67,666.83 - ' / - _ . _-_ --'----'' ` ~�1 . .-. -4 ---- • .` wm ., , .. .. w^ � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED vnPAGES / i TO ^" INCLUSIVE. OF THE �. .~ WARRANT -REGISTER FOR ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE PG 2? •••6 TO BY ~ FIN CE oll-1ECrOR31 ~|� ( •F��� j..; : . " " 34 ° ° ° `' I 1- 5 � --_--_-_--______ , '11 • • - . • .0' ., 7,1 ° � TI$ 110 � 1,1,1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 . _ • CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 H CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 H CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 PAGE_ 0001_ DATE 12/05/91 _VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00238 001-400-1212-4188 02235 $852.62 00041 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 00238 105-400-2601-4188 01215 $29.61 00041 12/01/91 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 00238 109-400-3301-4188 00203 $2.65 12/01/91 14 CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 VEH PPG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • 110-400-3302-4188 01455 $126.40 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 145-400-3401-4188 01205 34.25 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 145-400-3402-4188 01201 $1.51 12/01/91 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 39202 12/04/91 39202 12/04/91 00041 ' 39202 $0. 00 12/04/91 00041 39202 $0. 00 12/04/91 0023B 145-400-3403-4188 00408 $0.53 12/01/91 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMpLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN 00238 145-400-3408-4188 00043 $0.39 12/01/91 COMMUTER XPRESS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS H CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 H CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 H CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 14 CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 3 4 6 :0, 13. 16 '9 22 24 00041 39202 m $0.00 12/04/91 27 29 00041 39202 $0. 00 12/04/91 3! 12 00041 39202 $0. 00 12/04/91 33 3: 3 .90 00041 39202 341f $0.00 12/04/91 010 155-400-2102-4188 00730 $1.77 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 160-400-3102-4188 01179 $22.54 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 170-400-2103-4188 00199 12/01/91 PLAN 00238 12/01/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS 705-400-1209-4188 00497 LIABILITY INS 00041 39202 13, ,„n $0.00 12/04/91 4,3 00041 39202 $0. 00 12/04/91 $3. 48 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00041 39202 , $0. 00 12/04/91 11 $4. 42 00041 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 1 39202 2/04/91 H CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN 00238 705-400-1217-4188 00539 $16.63 00041 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************* ******** **** ******* **************************** $1,066.80 H GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 04397 001-400-1212-4188 02236 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS 39202 so 12/04/91 $350. 98 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00028 39203 $0. 00 12/04/91 L • 6 • •••" 64 14 75 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H GROUP AMERICAlLIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H GROUP AMERICA LIF CITY HEALTH INS/DEC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 04397 105-400-2601-4188 01216 $23.45 12/01/91 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 109-400-3301-4188 00204 $2.10 12/01/91 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04397 110-400-3302-4188 01456 $107'10 12/01/91 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1 04397 145-400-3401-4188 01206 $3.36 12/01/91 DIAL A RIDE /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS E INSURANCE. 04397 145-400-3402-4188 01202 $0,22 91 12/01/91 ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSURANCE 04397 145-400-3408-4188 00044 $0.31 91 12/01/91 COMMUTER XPRESS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS GROUP AMERICA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 • GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H GROUP AMERICA LIFE CITY HEALTH INS/DEC INV/REF PAGE__ __0002 DATE 12/05/91.11 1 PO # CHK p_ 1^ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 6 00028 39203 $0.00 12/04/91; 00028 39203 $0.00 12/04/91i S 00028 39203 $0.00 12/04/91 ,9 11 22 24 00028 39203 $0. 00 12/04/91 00028 39203 t� $0. 00 12/04/91 00028 39203 $0.00 12/04/91 3, 27 29 2'J 3a 04397 155-400-2102-4188 00731 $1.40 12/01/91 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 160-400-3102-4188 01180 $18.69 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2 04397 1170-400-2103-4188 00200 $26.29 04397 12/01/91 00028 39203 14 $0.00 12/04/91 00028 39203 $0.00 12/04/91 39 12/01/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSURANCE 04397 705-400-1209-4188 00498 $2.80 91 12/01/91 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS H GROUP AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CITY, HEALTH INS/DEC 91 04397 705-400-1217-4188 00540 $3.50 12/01/91 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE gENEFITS 00028 39203 42 $0.00 12/04/91 423 44 00028 39203 $0.00 12/04/91 47 n5 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********•a***********************************•n********************** $540.16 H HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 00241 001-400-1212-4188 02234 $16,364.80 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00241 12/01/91 H HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 105-400-2601-4188 01214 $773.35 STREET LIGHTING'3(EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 002411 109-400-3301-4188 00202 $66.12 12/01/91 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00028 $0.00 39203 12/04/91 q I•:2 00016 39201 $0.00 12/04/91 r4 5& •:9 00016 39201 $0.00 12/04/91 61 00016 39201 $0.00 12/04/91 97 6. I Hi %.+1 • 410 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 DATE 12/05/91. 2 410 VND # __ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #. AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK *- DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH H HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 00241 110-400-3302-4188 01454 12/01/91 PARKING ENF $2,23298 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00241 145-400-3401-4188 01204 INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 DIAL A RIDE t. • HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 00241 145-400-3402-4188 01200 12/01/91 ESEA 00241 145-400-3408-4188 00042 12/01/91 COMMUTER XPRESS 00241 155-400-2102-4188 00729 12/01/91 CROSSING GUARD H HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 00241 160-400-3102-4188 01178 12/01/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN H HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 00241 170-400-2103-4188 00198 12/01/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS 00241 705-400-1209-4188 00496 12/01/91 LIABILITY INS H HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 00241 1705-400-1217-4188 00538 12/01/91 WORKERS COMP $79. 78 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 39201 $0. 00 12/04/91, 00016 39201 $0.00 12/04/91i $27.41 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 ' 39201 $0.00 12/04/91 $5. 84 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 39201 $0. 00 12/04/91 $66. 12 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 39201 $0. 00 12/04/91 $529. 12 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 39201 $0.00 12/04/91 $688. 03 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00016 39201 $0. 00 12/04/91 $159.80 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************************************** H SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 H SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 00016 39201 $0.00 12/04/91 $186. 22 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS **** $21.179.57 00016 39201 $0.00 12/04/91 04398 001-400-1212-4188 02233 $875.72 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE,BENEFITS 04398 105-400-2601-4188 01213 $72.79 12/01/91 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS H SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 04398 109-400-3301-4188 00201 $7.19 12/01/91 VEH PKG DIST /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS H SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 00019 39200 $0.00 12/04/91 00019 39200 $0. 00 12/04/91 00019 39200 $0.00 12/04/91 62 6 7 40 8 10 11 12 13 '4 15 18 19 20 21 26 22 23 14 27 28 30 31 C3 34 35 70 10 • I 42 46 .11 51 t I . 04398 110-400-3302-4188 01453 $250.17 00019 39200 12/01/91 PARKING ENF \/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/04/91 H SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 043981 145-400-3401-4188 01203 12/01/91 DIAL A RIDE $6.89 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00019 $0. 00 39200 12/04/91 201 ..o .0 410 , I"- 12 13 79 soo CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE_ 000 TIME 12:23:29 FOR 12/05/9 DATE 12/05/91 J PAY VENDOR NAME' -- VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT _ -__ __.INV/REF._ PO * ._._ ...CHK #- 4 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 7 H SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 145-400-3402-4188 01199 $2.33 00019 39200 , CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91ESEA /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/04/91 :5,..6 H SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 145-400-3408-4188 00041 $0.68 00019 39200 12 13 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 COMMUTER XPRESS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/04/91 :5 SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 155-400-2102-4188 00728 $5.63 00019 39200 6 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/04/91 ,9 H SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 160-400-3102-4188 01177 $42.39 00019 39200 21 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/04/91 l_ SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 04398 170-400-2103-4188 00197 $61.17 12/01/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS H SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 705-400-1217-4188 00537 $2.82 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,327.78 *** PAY CODE TOTAL*********************************************+r******************** $24,114.31 A-1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 02180 001-400-2201-5401 00061 $518.89 OFFICE CHAIRS/FIRE DEPT 965-0 11/26/91 FIRE 9 * * * 00019 39200 �6 $0.00 12/04/91 27 00019 39200 $0.00 12/04/91 3, /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ADVANCE ELEVATOR $518.89 161965-0 03418 39208 $447.61 12/04/91 4 3; 34 Ig 35 96 11 IL, 477. 41 92 �. 43 00003 001-400-4204-4201 00491 $90.00 27884 00003 ELEVATOR MAINT/DEC 91 27884 12/01/91 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $90.00 47 R KAY*AKERLUND 04396 001-210-0000-2110 04610 $50.00 20816 03288 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 20816 11/27/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50. 00 39209 12/04/91 39210 12/04/91 51 • 141 '9 7.1 R ARATEX/RED STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 001-400-2201-4309 01194 $58.40 00017 39211 UTILITY RAG RENTAL/NOV91 11/30/91 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/04/91 ' J r. 4. •. •. 4 72 ,4 4 ')5 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ARATEX/RED UTILITY RAG R ARATEX/RED UTILITY RAG ARATEX/RED UTILITY RAG R ARATEX/RED UTILITY RAG CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 VND # . _ ._. ACCOUNT NUMBER ._.. _ TRN # _ _ _ ._ _._...AMOUNT __.__..__INV/REF DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 RENTAL/NOV91 11/30/91 STAR INDUSTRIAL 00152 RENTAL/NOV91 11/30/91 STAR INDUSTRIAL RENTAL/NOV91 STAR INDUSTRIAL RENTAL/NOV91 00152 11/30/91 00152 11/30/91 001-400-3104-4309 00768 TRAFFIC SAFETY *54.20 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-4204-4309 02167 BLDG MAINT 001-400-4205-4309 00601 EQUIP SERVICE 110-400-3302-4309 00801 PARKING ENF PAGE_ _...... 0009 DATE 12/05/91 PO # . .CHK # UNENC DATE EXP 2 3 4 6 7 00017 39211 ,o $0.00 12/04/91 1z 13 14 15 $189.80 00017 39211 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/04/91 $62.60 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $7.60 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $372.60 R BANC ONE LEASING LEASE PMT/DEC 91 00152 • 39211 $0.00 12/04/91 00017 39211 $0.00 12/04/91 99 - 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00098 $417.96 12/01/91 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS 00030 39212 $0.00 12/04/91 16 18 19 21 21 24 26 27 28 3 31 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $417.96 R DERIAN PRINTING SERVICE. INC. RECYCLING PLAN COPIES 3011 02664 001-400-4201-4201 00700 $617.03 11/06/91 BUILDING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 01308 001-400-1212-4188 02240 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 $617.03 $56.44 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 109-400-3301-4188 00206 12/01/91 VEH PKG DIST 01308 12/01/91 110-400-3302-4188 01458 PARKING ENF 01308 145-400-3401-4188 01208 12/01/91 DIAL A RIDE 01308 145-400-3402-4188 01204 12/01/91 ESEA BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 3.1 34 35 36 3011 02277 39213 $0.00 12/04/91 31 5, 39 4) -11 43 44 00055 39214 : $0.00 12/04/91 „ $2.77 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.16 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.69 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.28 \s/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00055 39214 .., $0.00 12/04/91 s1 00055 39214 s,, $0.00 12/04/91 00055 39214 ., $0.00 12/04/91 00055 39214 $0.00 12/04/91 01308 155-400-2102-4188 00733 $0.69 12/01/91 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00055 39214 $0.00 12/04/91 5— V v v v V v v u 4- .10 W 1.: W [-1 67 r0 71 • v /4 rs 4r ,y FINANCE—SFA340 T I ME_ 12:23:29 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION * * * BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 VENDOR TOTAL _ VND 0 . . ACCOUNT NUMBER._ TRN .0_ __AMOUNT__ DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01308 160-400-3102-4188 01182 12/01/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN 31.07 _.._ INV/REF PAGE 00061 DATE 12/05/91.2 13 PO 4 CHK IF_�y4 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP e 41, /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ******:eiritirittrit****x*iter*****it*iti►itit*itiri►itari ***stat******iter*iratir****iritttir**** R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R BLUE SHIELD PREFERRED CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 01293 001-400-1212-4188 02241 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS 01293 110-400-3302-4188 01459 12/01/91 PARKING'ENF 01293 145-400-3403-4188 00410 12/01/91 BUS PASS SUBSDY 01293 705-400-1217-4188 00542 12/01/91 WORKERS COMP 7 e 00055 392141 0 $0. 00 12/04/91. 11 12 $66. 10 $18,365!30 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $916. 66 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $13. 18 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00056 • 39215 $0. 00 12/04/91 00056 39215 $0.00 12/04/91 $118.37 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $19,413.51 •1 R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CK/245 30TH ST 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00692 3795 11/01/91 BUILDING ,001-400-4201-4201 00693 BUILDING R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. 00630 PLAN CK/243 30TH STREET 3795 11/01/91 R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. 00630 PLAN CK/34-50 PIER AVE 3793 R — BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN. CK/2839 EL OESTE 3795 R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CK/530 24TH PLACE 3795 R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CK/1706-12 STRAND 3795 BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CK/349 29TH STREET 3795 11/01/91 001-400-4201-4201 BUILDING R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. PLAN CK/2420 P.C.H. 3795 00630 001-400-4201-4201 11/01/91 BUILDING 00630 001-400-4201-4201 11/01/91 BUILDING 00630 001-400-4201-4201 11/01/91 BUILDING 00630 001-400-4201-4201 11/01/91 BUILDING 00056 39215 $0. 00 12/04/91 13 4 gib 15 16 IT 16 19 20 22 4113 23 24 25 26 27 26 00056 39215 $0.00 12/04/91 29 34 ?5 r 16 $447.20 3795 02275 39216 13 ' 12/04/91 29 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $447.20 • $447.20 3795 02274 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $447.20 00694 $274.04 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 39216 42 12/04/91 43 3795 02271 39216 $164.84 12/04/91 00699 $350.74 3799 02268 39216 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $390.74 12/04/91 00696 $195. 26 3795 02252 39216 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $195.26 12/04/91 00697 39216 ; 12/04/91 15u 00698 3795 02255 39216 FI $370.76 12/04/91 , 1 �l 15 10 g. 4: 41, 5o 4. 51 $1,320.28 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT i $370. 76 'CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 3795 02259 $1,320.28 4 00630 001-400-4201-4201 00699 11/01/91 BUILDING $231.92 3799 02253 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $231. 92 39216 12/04/91 G, •A TO 71 /4 15 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME . DESCRIPTION *41* CITY OF HERMOSABEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER_ TRN #. AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION - - • *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************** ********** **************************************** PAGE__ • 0007 DATE 12/05/91, INV/REF PO # . CHK #__ AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *3, 637. 40 R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY 00034 001-400-1206-4305 00526 $875.20 180586 09592 39217 GREENBAR COMPUTER PAPER 80586 11/15/91 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $875.20 12/04/91i VENDOR TOTAL 1 $875. 20 i R CANADA LIFE 00046 001-400-1212-4188 02244 $677.25 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS , R CANADA LIFE 00046 170-400-2103-4188 00202 $77.40 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $754.65 * * * * * * R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 00014 001-400-2401-4311 00249 11/30/91 ANIMAL CONTROL 00008 39218 $0. 00 12/04/91 00008 39218 $0.00 12/04/91 $133. 17 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00014 001-400-4205-4309 00600 $149.82 11/30/91 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R CHAMPION CHEVROLET MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 ---- 01112 39219 $0.00 12/04/91 00014 39219 $0. 00 12/04/91 00014 ,001-400-4205-4311 00248 $11.17 11/30/91 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01112 39219 $0. 00 12/04/91 VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $294.16 R CHEVRON USA, INC. MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 VENDOR 00634 170-400-2103-4310 00027 84419 11/30/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS 4.- • \ 2 3 7 to 10 V 13 14 5 16 1 13 19 20 1110 23 to 24_ 26 27 20 30 31 34 36 3 30 40 41 42 43 44 .16 4,1 $592.30 1417284419 01114 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 TOTAL ******************* ***** ******************************************** R SHARON*CONNELLY 04126 001-300-0000-3826 03314 REPLACE LOST WARRANT 21450 12/03/91 $592. 30 $50.00 37598/21950 02761 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES $0.00 I. 1 VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R COOPERS & LYBRAND FINAL BILLING/AUDIT 91 00310 11/12/91 $50. 00 39220 12/04/91 39221 12/04/91 034981 001-400-1202-4201 00295 $3,044.50 1726-000310 02759 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 39222 12/04/91 50 51 91 6 ! 40, 4, 410 4. 7 5 74 /5 '91 4, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH O FINANCE-SFA340DEMAND LIST PAGE_-.--._ 0008 TIME 12:23:29 - --- FOR 12/05/91 DATE 12/05/91T J PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT_ INV/REF PO # CHK f DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 6 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,044.50 R VIKI *COPELAND 00041 001-400-1202-4317 00087 $140.00 TR392 00392 39223 PER DIEM ADVANCE TR392 12/01/91 FINANCE ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 12/04/91 1 - _ ._..._. .. _. ___.__ _ _._. __...... _._. ._ .__.__ _.-_..._ _.-_.__- *** VENDOR TOTAL*****4************************************************************* $140.00 • DAPPER TIRE CO. 01390 001-400-2101-4311 01293 $121.72 01120 39224 MISC CHARGES/NOV 91 11/30/91 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/04/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $121.72 * * * R DIVE N' SURF 00604 001-400-2201-4309 01192 $40.00 48225/26 01123 39225 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 25/26 11/30/91 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/04/91 VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40. 00 7 15 11 12 13 14 1'; '1 2n 21 ;'▪ 3 24 26 27 2u 3▪ 1 34 ,5 R DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPLY 04394 001-400-2101-4305 01644 $79.11 59244 01180 39226 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 59244 11/30/91 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 12/04/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $79. 11 R ELAINE C.*DOERFLING 02055 001-400-1121-4317 00079 $75.00 TR386 00386 39227 PER DIEM ADVANCE TR386 12/01/91 CITY CLERK /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 12/04/91 46 R ELAINE C.*DOERFLING 02055 001-400-1122-4317 00051 $75.00 PER .DIEM ADVANCE TR3B6 12/01/91 ELECTIONS /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $150.00 TR386 00386 39227 .; $0.00 12/04/91 51 42. 43 44 DOUBLETREE INN 01339 001-400-1121-4317 00080 $108.90 TR386 00386 39228 HOTEL/VALDES/DOERFLING TR386 12/01/91 CITY CLERK /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 12/04/91 50 01339 001-400-1122-4317 00052 $108.90 TR386 00386 - 39228 HOTEL/VALDES/DOERFLING TR386 12/01/91 ELECTIONS \/CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 12/04/91 R DOUBLETREE INN *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************t't*********************************** $217.80 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-202-0000-2021 00110 $60.35 DISCOUNT OFFERED 11/30/91 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 01128 39230 $0. 00 12/04/91 57 6a 70 71 15/ 0.3 41/ L. 64. ; FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 .VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT AMOUNT _INV/REF DESCRIPTION R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 001-202-0000-2021 00112 DISCOUNT OFFERED 63841 11/27/91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS DISCOUNT OFFERED R EDDINGS BROTHERS DISCOUNT TAKEN AUTO PARTS 00165 001-202-0000-2021 00113 63842 11/27/91 AUTO PARTS 00165 001-202-0000-2022 00110 11/30/91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 DISCOUNT TAKEN 63841 11/27/91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 DISCOUNT TAKEN 63842 11/27/91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 001-202-0000-2022 00112 $13. 75 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $4. 47 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $60. 35CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $13. 75CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN PAGE 0009 DATE 12/05/91 PO # AMOUNT UNENC 2 3 CHK DATE EXP 6 163841 03617 39230 $0.00 12/04/91 - - 11 163842 03618 39230 $0. 00 12/04/91 ,5 10 01128 ' 39230 $0.00 12/04/91 ,9 20 21 163841 03617 39230 , $0.00 12/04/91 001-202-0000-2022 00113 $4.47CR 163842 03618 39230 27 00165 001-400-2101-4311 01291 11/30/91 POLICE PARTS 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00710 11/30/91 ST MAINTENANCE R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS v MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 00165 001-400-3104-4311 00086 11/30/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $967. 00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/04/91 01128 39230 $0. 00 12/04/91 $287. 19 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $22. 66 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01128 39230 $0.00 12/04/91 01128 39230 $0. 00 PARTS 00165 001-400-4204-4309 02172 11/30/91 BLDG MAINT PARTS 00165 001-400-4204-4311 00204 11/30/91 BLDG MAINT R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 $12. 89 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $228. 99 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00602 11/30/91 EQUIP SERVICE PARTS 00165 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MOTOR OIL/CITY YARD 63841 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO TRANSMISSION FLUID/YARD R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 11/30/91 001-400-4205-4310 00219 EQUIP SERVICE 12/04/91 31 32 34 36 37 ) 01128 39230 , $0. 00 12/04/91 44 01128 39230 $0.00 12/04/91 , $736.57 01128 39230 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/04/91 $140.35 01128 39230 , 641 4.1 4.4 .11 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 12/04/91 H,4.0 00165 001-400-4205-4310 00220 $673.91 163841 03617 39230 11/27/91 EQUIP SERVICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $762.66 12/04/91 PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-4310 00221 $218.80 63842 11/27/91 EQUIP SERVICE \/MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES PARTS 00165 001-400-4205-4311 00249 $213.75 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 163842 03618 39230 $248.27 12/04/91 11/30/91 EQUIP SERVICE 01128 39230 66 $0. 00 12/04/91 67 1,1 I I: v.0 FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST TIME 12:23:29 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PAY VENDOR NAME _ DESCRIPTION R R R *** R R * * * EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 EDDINGS BROTHERS MISC. CHARGES/NOV FOR 12/05/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT__ INV/REF DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PAG 001 00165 001-400-6101-4311 00263 11/30/91 PARKS /AUTO 00165 105-400-2601-4311 00241 11/30/91 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO AUTO PARTS - 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00749 91 11/30/91 PARKING ENF /AUTO VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $3,849.90 $14‘. 43 MAINTENANCE $62.95 MAINTENANCE $270!41 MAINTENANCE DATE 12/05/91. PO # _ CHK* .' UNENC DATE EXP : a 01128 39230 ' $0. 00 12/04/91 01128 39230 u .,. $0.00 12/04/91, 01128 ' 39230 1B ... $0.00 12/04/91 ,,, 12 20 EFRAM MOBIL MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 EFRAM MOBIL MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 21 22 .10 Li 24 01400 001-400-2101-4310 00336 $239.82 01129 39231 POLICE 26 qt, 11/30/91 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 12/04/91 2,3 01400 001-400-4201-4310 00103 $5.0001129 39231 11/30/91 BUILDING /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 12/04/91 :: 4. R EFRAM MOBIL MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 01400 110-400-3302-4310 00155 $21.22 11/30/91 PARKING ENF /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $266. 04 01129 39231 $0.00 12/04/91 R ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY 02354 1001-400-3103-6900 00092 $1,736.78 2178 00043 LEASE PMT/DEC 91 2178 11/15/91 ST MAINTENANCE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $1,736.78 R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV R GTE CALIFORNIA, TELE CHARGES/NOV *** VENDOR INCORPORATED 91 INCORPORATED 91 INCORPORATED 91 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00928 $39.50 11/30/91 POLICE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00614 $38.76 11/30/91 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00612 11/30/91 COMM RESOURCES $48. 70 /TELEPHONE TOTAL ******************************************************************** $126.96 R GUARDIAN DENTAL. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 02623 001-400-1212-4188 02242 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS 39232 12/04/91 01131 39233 $0.00 12/04/91 01131 39233 $0. 00 12/04/91 01131 39233 $0. 00 12/04/91 41.• 35 34 37 3.0 3. 40 91 42 4L, 43 an .30 4Ji 4,fr 73' 60 51 $2,854.40 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00001 39234 $0. 00 12/04/91 67 0,4 70 71 72 /4 75 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ # PAGE_ ..._ 0011 DATE 12/05/91 TRN # _ _ AMOUNT....__...._... INV/REF. PO # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02623 105-400-2601-4188 01218 12/01/91 STREET LIGHTING *2.35 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 110-400-3302-4188 01460 12/01/91 PARKING ENF 02623 145-400-3401-4188 01209 91 12/01/91 DIAL A RIDE *92.67 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • 00001 39234 $0.00 12/04/91 00001 39234 *0.00 12/04/91 16 39234 12/04/91 *1.18 00001 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *0.00 GUARDIAN DENTAL 02623 145-400-3403-4188 00411 31.41 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 BUS PASS SUBSDY /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 02623 160-400-3102-4188 01183 12/01/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN 02623 170-400-2103-4188 00201 12/01/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 02623 705-400-1209-4188 00500 12/01/91 LIABILITY INS $17.31 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *23. 52 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *29.92 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2 3 4 6 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I9 00001 39234 zz *0.00 12/04/91 .3 00001 39234 , $0.00 12/04/91 2 00001 39234 37 $0. 00 12/04/91 31 1/ 12 v v V 4) 4) 00001 39234 *0.00 12/04/91 02623 705-400-1217-4188 00543 *44.88 00001 12/01/91 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL •***************************•*************** ******************•a***•r** *3,067.64 R HAAKER EGUIPMENT CO. 00731 001-400-3103-4311 00712 *675.08 STREET SWEEPER PARTS 2/A/B 11/13/91 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC CHARGES/NOV 91 00065 001-400-1207-4311 00060 1392 11/30/91 BUS LICENSE R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC CHARGES/NOV 91 R. HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC CHARGES/NOV 91 *675.08 *4.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00065 001-400-2101-4311 01292 1392 11/30/91 POLICE /AUTO 00065 001-400-4201-4311 00266 1392 11/30/91 BUILDING \,/AUTO R HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC CHARGES/NOV 91 • 39234 12/04/91 33 34 35 36 3! 311 42 43 4) v d 2662/4/8 03606 39235 $659.68 12/04/91 4 "0 1392 01136 39236 *0.00 12/04/91 $104.00 MAINTENANCE *20.00 MAINTENANCE 1392 01136 39236 *0.00 12/04/91 1392 01136 39236 $0.00 12/04/91 00065 001-400-4202-4311 00197 1392 11/30/91 PUB WKS ADMIN *4.00 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 1392 01136 39236 $0.00 12/04/91 5.1 y 150 16555 r 70 71 r l4 75 1 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE '0012 FOR 12/05/91 DATE 12/05/91 HERMOSA CAR WASH MISC CHARGES/NOV 91 1392 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE INVC PROJ # TRN #AMOUNT_.__INV/REF PO # CHK #' ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • 00065 170-400-2103-4311 00019 $8.00 1392 01136 392364- 11/30/91 , SPEC INVESTGTNS /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/04/91, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $140.00 R ICMA 00157 001-400-1202-4316 00399 $331.45 PUBLICATIONS/FINANCE 06783 11/14/91 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING ' 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $33.45 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-4204-4309 02169 $292.82 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 31918 11/12/91 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $292.82 J 1, 2 3 4 6 a 10 I. I 2 13 14 411, t 15 A06783 02755 • 39237 8 $33.45 12/04/91 io 31918 01174 39238 $0.00 12/04/91 R ISLAND STYLE CONSTRUCTION 03251 001-210-0000-2110 04608 $100.00 28899 03287 39239 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 28899 11/27/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/04/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************'►*************************************ar*********** $100.00 R STAN*KIM 02833 ,001-400-4601-4201 01137 $665.00 03596 39240 FALL CLASS INSTRUCTOR 11/20/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/04/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MANHATTAN CAR WASH MISC. CHARGES/OCT 91 $665.00 01146 001-400-2101-4311 01294 $100.15 10/31/91 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.15 R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 001-400-3104-4311 00085 $191.52 01144 39242 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 d 11/30/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/04/91 ., 1 2n 23 74 27 29 2Y 31 32 13 34 35 35 37 3n 39 40 4, 47 43 44 45 47 4n 01043 39241 $0.00 12/04/91 so 5, *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R MERRITT HOUSE HOTEL ADV/V. COPELAND TR392 $191.52 CO 04399' 12/01/91 001-400-1202-4317 00088 $108.90 FINANCE ADMIN /CONFERENCE EXPENSE TR392 00392 39243 $0.00 12/04/91 6c 67 rn 77 l3 l4 y J 42 4 a. 4- 4 to. u 4.0 4— I FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 PAGE .0013. DATE 12/05/91. VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF _ PO # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $108. 90 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 170-400-2103-4310 00026 $13.82 930784K2 01048 39244 WESTNET GASOLINE/OCT 91 784K2 10/31/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 12/04/91i *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** •, $13.82 .L) a.) 3 6 7 4-J a 10 It ILI 12 13 14 5 V 16 18 19 MONARCH BROOM 00094 001-400-3103-4309 01263 $958.02 8434/35 01147 39245 MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 34/35 11/30/91 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/04/91 ,3 . 24 - •. 25 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $958.02 27 78 R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY 00091 001-400-1212-4188 02238 $772.20 00013 39246 CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/04/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $772.20 i I R NATIONAL HOME LIFE 03465001-400-1212-4199 02239 $80.00 00065 39247 ..w CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/04/91 I, _ ,- *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $80.00 .... 1 ' R NEW PACIFIC LUMBER CO. 00606 001-400-3103-4309 01264 $81.19 608511 01149 39248 I. s._., MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 08511 11/01/91 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/04/91 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************** ***** ********************************************** $81.19 •.. kw. R OUR' LADY OF GUADALUPE CHURCH 04395 001-210-0000-2110 04609 $50.00 24649 03289 39249 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 24649 11/27/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 12/04/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** ., ,18 $50. 00 4 1 4 R PACIFIC ARBOR NURSERIES 03809 001-300-0000-3903 00210 $1.289.69 ' 1099 03520 39250 ...• TREES/HERMOSA "RELEAF" 1099 10/16/91 \/CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT $1.294.67 12/04/91 6. .., 29 31 32 14 35 39 41 42 43 44 42, 50 51 52 53 58 ,21 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************************4*********************************** $1.288.69 67 R PACTEL CELLULAR — LA 03209 170-400-2103-4304 00026 $1.557.92 01150 39251 70 MOBILE PHONE CHGS/NOV 91 11/30/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TELEPHONE $0.00 12/04/91 fl 71 '4 75 _y 41.) •••V 4.1.4 13. I' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** F INANCE—SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 91 R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 91 R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 91 R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 91 R PAGENET PAGING SERV/DEC 91 VENDOR • 02487 001-400-1201-4201 00129 14234 12/01/91 CITY MANAGER 02487 001-400-2101-4307 00301 14234 12/01/91 POLICE 02487 001-400-2401-4201 00319 14234 12/01/91 ANIMAL CONTROL 02487 001-400-4202-4201 00338 14234 12/01/91 PUB WKS ADMIN 02487 001-400-4601-4201 01138 14234 12/01/91 COMM RESOURCES .40 PAGE.---_ _0014 DATE 12/05/91 1J INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1,557.92 $11. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR $188. 00 /RADIO MAINTENANCE $11.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR $110. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR $22. 00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR TOTAL******************************************************************** $342.00 R PEP BOYS MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 00608 001-400-2101-4311 01295 $93.06 15791 11/30/91 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $93.06 R R. S. T. FLUID POWER DISCOUNT OFFERED 1215 1215 R R.S.T. FLUID POWER BROOM MOTOR/ST SWEEPER 1215 R R.S.T. FLUID POWER DISCOUNT TAKEN 04155 001-202-0000-2021 00111 11/27/91 04155 001-202-0000-2022 11/27/91 04155 11/27/91 $8. 51 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 00111 $8. 51CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 001-400-3103-4311 00711 $416.76 ST MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $416.76 R SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT BOOKING FEES/POLICE 40507 00151 001-400-2101-4251 11/26/91 POLICE 11214234 00049 IVAT $0.00 11214234 00049 $0. 00 11214234 00049 IVAT $0.00 11214234 00049 IVAT $0. 00 11214234 00049 IVAT $0. 00 15791 01153 $0.00 39252 12/04/91 39252 12/04/91 39252 12/04/91 !: !a 39252 12/04/91 2, 39252 12/04/91 39253 12/04/91 fa 75 u .�a 1215 02962 39254 $0.00 12/04/91 1,7 1215 02962 39254 $0.00 12/04/91 51 1215 02962 39254 $425.27 12/04/91 00411 $134.76 90107/40507 00035 \/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R SHORELINE PRINTING BUS CARDS/BENZ/EDGERTON 9577 03505 11/20/91 $0. 00 39255 I, 12/04/91 $134. 76 001-400-1101-4305 00403 $54. 13 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ti• 9577 02131 39256 $54. 13 12/04/91 0 a 0 a r v C.• a, 4. U 4, Lr, ti if& FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R SHORELINE PRINTING BUS CARDS/STURGES/MORGAN 9568 R R *a* R R *** R R SHORELINE PRINTING BUS CARDS/POLICE DEPT 9547 SHORELINE PRINTING BUS CARDS/FIRE DEPT 9547 VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 PAGE ____ 0015 DATE 12/05/91 ;l 6 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #.. . _ AMOUNT ._.._ _ _INV/REF.. PO # .CHK * DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 03505 11/20/91 001-400-1206-4305 00525 $54.12 DATA PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 03505 001-400-2101-4305 11/14/91 POLICE 03505 001-400-2201-4305 11/14/91 FIRE 01643 $541.25 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00516 $324.75 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *********************** ************************ war****************** $974.25 SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 SINCLAIR PAINT CO. MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 01399 001-400-4204-4309 02168 34/35 11/30/91 BLDG MAINT 01399 305-400-8506-4309 00053 34/35 11/30/91 CIP 86-506 $259. 10 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $75. 07 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $334.17 SMART & FINAL IRIS MISC CHARGES/NOV 91 SMART & FINAL IRIS MISC CHARGES/NOV 91 COMPANY 00114 60/34 11/30/91 COMPANY 00114 60/34 11/30/91 001-400-2101-4306 01087 POLICE 001-400-2401-4309 00182 ANIMAL CONTROL 9568 09591 39256 $54.12 12/04/91 9547 03135 39256 $541. 25 12/04/91 9547 03414 39256 $297.69 12/04/91 8434/35 01159 39257 $0.00 12/04/91 8434/35 01159 39257 $0.00 12/04/91 $79.15 147560/34 01160 39258 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 12/04/91 N V II v ,2 13 ,4 ,o 22 ll I27 20 ifI"' .31 l�. 10 $63.45 147560/34 01160 39256 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 12/04/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $142.60 * * * *** R SO CALIF RAPID TRANSIT DISTR. BUS PASS SALES/NOV 91 58151 VENDOR TOTAL 00843 145-400-3403-4251 00115 $1,275.00 11/30/91 BUS PASS SUBSDY /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT ******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITE SURCHARGE/OCT 91 VENDOR TOTAL $1,275.00 41 .ai 4.0 o, 44 4( CV 58151 03326 39259 s, $0.00 12/04/91 ,$ 00118 110-300-0000-3302 43053 $18,208.00 10/31/91 /COURT FINES/PARKING ******************************************************************** R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITATION COURT BAIL $18, 208. 00 00400 110-300-0000-3302 43054 $543.00 11/27/91 /COURT FINES/PARKING 02762 39260 $0.00 12/04/91 03330 39261 $0. 00 12/04/91 �l2 fd ,20 0 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** R R R R VENDOR TOTAL SOUTH RAY WELDERS MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 SOUTH BAY WELDERS MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #- AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00018 001-400-2201-4309 01193 11/30/91 FIRE 00018 001-400-3103-4309 01262 11/30/91 ST MAINTENANCE 00018 001-400-3104-4309 00767 11/30/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00018 001-400-4204-4321 00613 11/30/91 BLDG MAINT PAGE . 0016 DATE 12/05/91 INV/REF PO # CHK #: AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $543.00 $28.15 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $70.10 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $13.95 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *33. 45 /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT *a* VENDOR TOTAL**************************************n*************?r*************** $145.65 * L* SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. MON GAS BILLS/NOV 91 VENDOR TOTAL 00170 001-400-4204-4303 00499 2520.37 11/30/91 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES ******************************************************************** 2520.37 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00364 1001-400-2101-4251 00412 2249.00 FINGERPRINT APPS/OCT 91 00541 11/19/91 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTAL****n*************************************************************** $249.00 R STEWART-JACKSON SPRINKLERS, INC REPAIR BACKFLOW DEVICES 12946 R STEWART-JACKSON SPRINKLERS, INC 02264 BACKFLOW DEVICE TESTING 12808 10/31/91 02264 001-400-3101-4201 00093 11/14/91 MEDIANS R STEWART-JACKSON SPRINKLERS1INC REPAIR BACKFLOW DEVICES 12946 R STEWART-JACKSON SPRINKLERS, INC BACKFLOW DEVICE TESTING 12908 001-400-3101-4201 00094 MEDIANS 02264 001-400-6101-4201 00250 11/14/91 • PARKS 02264 001-400-6101-4201 00251 10/31/91 PARKS $462.50 /CONTRACT' SERVICE/PRIVAT 01162 39262 $0.00, 12/04/911 14 - 01162 39262 $0.00 12/04/91. 01162 39262 20.00 12/04/91 01162 $0.00 39262 ,5 12/04/91 z, r, 01164 39263 20.00 12/04/91 900541 00023 39264 $0.00 12/04/91 f) J •J 12946 02994 39265 $462.50 12/04/91 . 4 2374.00 12808 02965 39265 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 2363.00 12/04/91 2462.50 12946 02994 39265 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRI,VAT 2462.50 12/04/91 , $374.00 \„/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL *******+*** ****************************************************** 21,673.00 R THOMPSON LACQUER PAINT THINNER 12808 02965 39265 $363.00 12/04/91 04080 001-400-3104-4309 00769 2262.77 31211 11/14/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 831211 03604 39266 $262.77 12/04/91 o FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN #.-.. ._.._. AMOUNT.- DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL ******+r*********** ***** .*********** ►***** ************************* R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT OFFERED R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT OFFERED R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT OFFERED R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT TAKEN TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT TAKEN R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT TAKEN R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/NOV 91 16084 14725 16084 00124 001-202-0000-2021 00107 11/30/91 00124 11/21/91 00124 11/13/91 00124 11/30/91 00124 11/21/91 001-202-0000-2021 00108 001-202-0000-2021 00109 001-202-0000-2022 00107 001-202-0000-2022 00108 00124 001-202-0000-2022 00109 14725 11/13/91 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY WATER HEATER/CITY HALL 16084 R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY WATER HEATER/BASE THREE 00124 001-400-3101-4309 11/30/91 MEDIANS INV/REF $262.77 DATE 12/05/91: PO # CHK #__ DATE EXP AMOUNT UNENC $5.02 01168 39267 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 12/04/91 $2! 59 16084 03624 39267 ,8 DISCOUNTS, OFFERED $0.00 12/04/91 $31.95 14725 03622 39267 ;21 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 12/04/91 $5.02CR 01168 39267 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 12/04/91 $2.59CR 16084 03624 39267 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 12/04/91 2 3 5 7 3 10 n 12 3 f, 15 is $3. 95CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN • 00116 $246.31 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS • 00124 '001-400-4204-4309 02170 11/21/91 BLDG MAINT 00124 001-400-4204-4309 02171 14725 11/13/91 BLDG MAINT $126.70 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $193.37 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $566.38 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DE_C 91 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 00240 001-400-1212-4188 02243 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS $235.99 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 145-400-3401-4188 01210 12/01/91 DIAL A RIDE 00240 145-400-3402-4188 01205 12/01/91 ESEA R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 14725 03622 39267 24 25 27 PO 37 34 $0.00 12/04/91 35 01168 39267 37 13 $0.00 12/04/91 3 16084 03624 39267 $0.00 12/04/91 14725 03622 39267 $0.00 12/04/91 00029 39268 $0.00 12/04/91 $0.94 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.38 ,\/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00501 12/01/91 LIABILITY INS 1 - 42 43 44 45 54 00029 39268 $0.00 12/04/91 I.n 00029 39268 i,'. $0.00 12/04/91 II, $3.17 00029 39268 I, /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/04/91 of • !A 1 111113. 331.1 r. I ! FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 12:23:29 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *r* R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 12/05/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # _. -. AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00544 $3.17 12/01/91 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PAGE ____0016. DATE 12/03/91 INV/REF PO .# CHK #_ ******************** n*********************************************** *243.65 R UNIVERSITY OF1NEDRASKA-LINCOLN SEMINAR REG/L. ESSLINGER 37396 04392 001-400-4601-4316 00171 $68.00 11/22/91 COMM RESOURCES /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL****************+*************************************************** R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 03790 001-400-1212-4188 02237 12/01/91 EMP BENEFITS 03790 105-400-2601-4188 01217 12/01/91 STREET LIGHTING R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 ' R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILIT CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 $68.00 $2,010.99 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 377. 05 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 4-- 00029 39268 30. 00 12/04/91 ,I ,2 '3 ,4 ,5 137396 03702 39269 $68.00 12/04/91 ,9 L 23 00022 39270 $0.00 12/04/91 00022 39270 $0.00 .12/04/91 03790 109-400-3301-4188 00205 12/01/91 VEH PKG DIST Y INS. 03790 110-400-3302-4188 01457 12/01/91 PARKING ENF R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 03790 12/01/91 03790 12/01/91 $9.00 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $385.23 /EMPLOYEE DENEFITS 145-400-3401-4188 01207 DIAL A RIDE 145-400-3402-4188 01203 ESEA R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY CIN HEALTH INS/DEC 91 $13.29 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $4.70 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00022 25 27 32 39270 3 30. 00 12/04/91 00022 39270 30.00 12/04/91 34 35 3! )'i 00022 39270 $0.00 12/04/91 , 00022 39270 30. 00 12/04/91 .17 03790 145-400-3403-4188 00409 12/01/91 BUS PASS SUBSD INS. 03790 145-400-3408-4188 00045 12/01/91 COMMUTER XPRES R UNUM LONG TERM DISADILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 $1.37 Y /EMPLOYEE,BENEFITS $1.12 S /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 155-400-2102-4188 00732 12/01/91 CROSSING GUARD 03790 160-400-3102-4188 01181 12/01/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 037901 12/01/91 00022 39270 $0.00 12/04/91 00022 39270 $0.00 $6.00 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $60.60 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 705-400-1209-4188 .00499 LIABILITY INS SJ 5, 12/04/91 00022 39270 $0.00 12/04/91 00022 39270 $0.00 12/04/91 $18.61 00022 /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 39270 12/04/91 66 c, 'O !4 )5 cJ • FINANCE—SFA340... TIME 12:23:29 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST • FOR 12/05/91 PGE 0012 CATE 12/05/91 PAY VENDOR NAME . VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # _CHK DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PRO) # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 6 7 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. - 03790 705-400-1217-4188 00541 $26.41 00022 39276—r -1'u ; CITY HEALTH INS/DEC 91 12/01/91 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 12/04/91 _ . • *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $2.614.37 12 13 14 15 R NAOMA*VALDE8 1 04040 001-400-1121-4317 00078 $75)00 TR393 00393 . 39271 ‘13 PER DIEM ADVANCE TR393 12/01/91 CITY CLERK /CONFERENCE. EXPENSE $0.00 12/04/91 ;s R NAOMA*VALDES 04040 001-400-1122-4317 00050 $751.00 TR393 00393 39271 PER DIEM ADVANCE TR393 12/01/91 ELECTIONS /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 12/04/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $150.00 . 25, 21 23 24 .ii 26 27 221 R29 XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-4201 00817 $400.43 31029732 00007 39272 ., METER USE/MAINT/OCT 91 29732 11/14/91 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 12/04/91 3; 32 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $400.43 12 *** PAY CODE TOTAL *******************************************************'*********** $77.056.23 34 35 34 3 / 3,3 *** TOTAL WARRANTS ****************************************************************** $101.170.54 4- 41 42 43 44 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAGES TO // INCLUSIVE. OF THE WARRANT REGISTER FOR i ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE to THE BUDGET. BY F IRECIOR DATE7Z____Al/r/q1_ -1 I 4Ik • • • • • • , • • 4; 0 .16 42 3-23 51 52 56 55 t ; / 71 14,1 • .11 • • December 5, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of December 10, 1991 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS December 12, 1991 - 7:30 p.m. Workshop meeting with Planning Commission January 14, 1992 Council 6/25/91 Agreement on Prospect/ Aviation signs & review of left turn arrow at Prospect & Aviation Public Works Director Council 8/13/91 Report on procedure for protecting survey monuments 16th to 19th sts. Public Works Dir. Alternatives for parking solutions on PCH (GIP) Building Director Report on implementation of new computer system (GIP) Data Processing Award contract for janitorial services Public Works Director Appointment of members to Cable Advisory Board Community Resources Dir. City Mgr.3/25/91 Amendment of ordinance regulating real estate signs Building Director Hope Chapel Lease Renewal (Rm. 13) Community Resources Dept. 3/27/91 CIP 89-176 - Call for bids, traffic signal pre-emption Public Hearings Text amendment to zoning ordinance to require Relocation Impact Report (RIR) for displacement of mobilehomes and adoption of negative declaration 1 Public Works Director Planning Director Appeal of Planning Commission decision denying a CUP amendment for painting in conjunction with operation of existing auto body repair business at 501-555 PCH January 28, 1992 Planning Director Council 10/9/90 Map and time schedule for street sweeping Public Wks. Dir. Coordination of street sweeping with trash pickup days Public Works Dir. Statistical survey - requested at 4/23/91 meeting Plan checking and inspection fees for public improvements Report on cost effectiveness of downtown enforcement (GIP) Report on increasing police foot patrol CIP 89-151 - Award contract for Office of Traffic Safety grant Award contract for Traffic Engineer Appeal of P.C. denial of request to allow a 2nd story office addition providing less than required off- street parking at 415 Pier Ave. February 11, 1992 CIP 85-137 - Valley Ardmore overlay accept as complete Public Works Director Police/Finance Police Chief Public Works Director Public Works Director Planning Director Public Works Director 2nd Quarter CIP status report Public Works Director Quarterly update Goals Implementa- tion Plan City Manager Approval of Land Use Element (GIP) Planning Director Council 7/23/91 Vehicle parking on unimproved r -o -w including pedestrian walk streets Public Works Director February 25, 1992 - 2 - Street lighting/Crossing Guards - resolutions ordering preparation of reports Report on improving T.V. capabilities for Council Chambers (GIP) Identify misc. revenue, develop appropriate fee (GIP) March 24, 1992 CIP 89-142 - Accept sidewalk repairs as complete Public Works Director Report on Management audits (GIP) Finance Director April 14, 1992 Rotation of Mayor April 28, 1992 Proclamation declaring May Water Awareness Month 3rd Quarter CIP status report Public Works Director Public Works Director Community Resources Finance Director Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program May 12, 1992 Proclamation Public Works Week May 18 to 22 Project Touch lease renewal (Rms. 3 & 11) May 26, 1992 City Manager Public Works Director Community Resources Dir. Street lighting/Crossing Guard (a) resolution approving report (b) resolution setting public hearing for June 23 Public Works Director June 9, 1992 Dispute Resolution Services lease renewal Community Resources Dir. June 23, 1992 Report on civilian enforcement officers (GIP) Public Safety Director 3 Street lighting/Crossing Guard public hearing Public Works Director July 28, 1992 4th Quarter CIP status report Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program August 11, 1992 Hope Chapel Lease renewal (Rms. 5, 6A) September 8, 1992 Recommendation on changing telephone system (GIP) Association for Retarded Citizens lease renewal (Rm. 1, 2, 15) South Bay Hospital District lease renewal (Rm 9) Easter Seals lease renewal (Rms. 16, 17) December, 1992 Housing element (GIP) Project Touch lease renewal (Rm.C) Public Works Director City Manager Community Resources Dir. General Services Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community. Resources Dir. Planning Director Community Resources Dir. ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Public Works Director Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council 5/8/90 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project Planning Director Goal 4 5/16/90 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function Finance Director - 4 - Council 8/14/90 Review of standard CUP conditions Planning Dir. Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Dir. City Mgr.2/21/91 RFP for computer system Data Processing Council 3/12/91 South School Conceptual design Community Resources Council Bid spec. for office systems (furniture) Finance Director Award of bid for purchase of computer equipment for Police Dept. Police Chief Council 6/6/91 Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Planning Director Staff 7/25/91 Adjustment of Park Tax Building Director Council 8/27 Revision of allowable uses in open space zone Planning Council 9/24/91 Effect of nonconforming ordinance on damaged structures Planning Dept. Report on productivity incentives for employees (GIP) Personnel Director Participate w/school civics program coordinator (GIP) Personnel Director Rental agreement for office copier Interim City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council December 3, 1991 City Council Meeting of December 10, 1991 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is a report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of November 1991. Respectfully submitted, A_7 -i1 Gary Bruts City Treasurer NOTED: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager 1d INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - NOVEMBER 1991 DATE OF INVESTMENT LAIF BALANCE 11/01/91 Maturity Maturity Investment BALANCE 11/30/91 $6,077,000.00 <350,000.00> <78,243.82> 400,000.00 $6,048,756.18 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 11/01/91 'Investment BALANCE 11/30/91 CORPORATE NOTES: Ford Motor Credit Co. Investment U.S. TREASURY BOND: Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment $ 572,998.70 279,131.66 852,130.36 $ 500,000.00 $ 499,218.75 $1,000,156.25 $ 499,921.88 $ 995,312.50 $ 996,875.00 11/27/91 11/12/91 5/19/88 1/03/90 3/06/90 3/08/90 4/20/90 5/14/90 DATE OF MATURITY 11/12/91 11/20/91 5/20/93 12/31/91 2/29/92 2/29/92 3/31/92 2/15/93 INTEREST 6.719% 6.53% 9.10% 7.71% 8.50% 8.50% 8.763% 8.49% Investment $1,005,937.50 9/14/90 6/30/94 8.50% INVESTMENT TOTAL $12,398,308.42 SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 10/01/91 BALANCE 10/31/91 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO. $ 531,032.22 BALANCE 3/25/91 BALANCE 3/25/91 TRUSTEE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 531,032.22 8.625% $ 11,250.83 11,250.83 $ 542,283.05 $12,940,591.47 Respectfully Submitted, Gary Bruts City Treas rer 7.5% December 2, 1991 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL December 10, 1991 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #22059 (C.U.P. CON NO. 90-2) LOCATION: 711 11TH STREET APPLICANT(S): CARL W. BUHLERT REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A 2 - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #22059 which is consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map #22059 at their April 3, 1990 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. CONCUR: f ,7 Michael Schubach Planning Director Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager p/srfinmap Respectfully submitted, 7,u. Ken Robertson Associate Planner le 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #22059 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 711 ELEVENTH STREET, HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on December 10, 1991 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivi- sion Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/ or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions out- lined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 90-27 adop- ted after hearing on April 3, 1990. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #22059 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 7, Block 1, Tract 6851, as recorded in Book 84, Page 97 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 711 Eleventh Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 1991. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 0-(1.644L Iv p/rsfinmap PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY December 4, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 10, 1991 Appropriation Of Funds, South School Acquisition Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Appropriate previously designated funds for the purchase of the South School property to Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 515 as follows: Park and Recreation Facilities Fund $1,356,506 (Park Rec. Fund) General Fund 700,000 $2,056,506 2. Appropriate additional funds as necessary from the Park Rec. Fund if survey results determine higher than estimated square footage. 3. Approve repayment of the above amounts from proceeds of the Biltmore sale. Background On February 13, 1990, the City Council designated 1 $700,000 from the General Fund and $1,606,506 from the Park Rec. Fund for pur- chase of surplus school property. Of the $1,606,506, $50,000 was appropriated August 13, 1991 for Edith Rodeway Park improvements and $200,000 was used for the escrow deposit on South School, leav- ing a balance of $1,356,506. Total designations available for the purchase equal $2,056,506. Escrow on the South School property closes on January 10, 1992. Per the acquisition agreement approved on June 25, 1991, the City is required to deposit the balance of the purchase price within three (3) days prior to the close of escrow, or by January 7, 1992. The agreement establishes a purchase price of $12 per square foot, with actual square footage to be established by a survey of the property. The estimated purchase price is $2,240,000. Analysis Funds for the $200,000 deposit were previously appropriated to CIP 515. Since the City Council does not meet again until January 14, 1992, it is necessary to appropriate the funds now. Based on the if estimated price of $2,240,000, $2,040,000 would be payable on January 7, 1992 (after subtracting the deposit). The preliminary survey suggests that the square footage may be higher by about 2,400 square feet, which would increase the price by $28,800. Staff recommends approval of an appropriation of the additional funds from the Park Rec. Fund if the actual survey, in fact, determines higher square footage. Proposition H, passed by the voters on November 5, 1991, permits sale of the Biltmore site, contingent upon use of the proceeds for acquisition of at least four (4) acres of open space property. It is recommended that funds appropriated now be repaid upon the sale of the Biltmore property. Concur: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Viki Copeland Finance Director lin governmental fund accounting, "designations" indicate tentative plans for use of funds. Use of the more common term "reserve" should be limited to funds which are legally restricted. December 2, 1991 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission December 10, 1991 SUBJECT: POLICY STATEMENT 91-3 REQUEST: CONFIRMATION OF INTERPRETATION THAT CHECK CASHING IS NOT A PERMITTED USE IN THE C-3 ZONE Recommendation Staff recommends confirmation of the Planning Commission interpretation and Policy Statement by minute order. Background The request to operate a check cashing business at 524 P.C.H. was made by V.I.P. Mortgage Banker. At their meeting of November 19, 1991, the Planning Commission adopted a policy statement to make an interpretation that a check cashing establishment is not on the permitted use list and does not fall under the category of "banking and financial institution." Section 1101 of the zoning ordinance assigns the Planning Commission the duty to make interpretations when an ambiguity exists with respect to the appropriate classification of a particular use and requires the City Council's confirmation. Analysis Please refer to the attached memorandum to the Planning Commission for the analysis. If the Commission's interpretation is confirmed the business still has the option of requesting a text amendment to include check cashing as a permitted use or as a conditionally permitted use. Alternatives A. Confirm the Commission's policy statement, but sponsor a text amendement to include "check cashing" as a permitted or conditionally permitted use in the C-3 zone (this way the business would not have to pay an application fee for the text amendment). Th B. Overturn the Commission's decision and interpret the category of "finance and banking institution" to include check cashing businesses. /1 f CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director Iden Robertson Associate Planner Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Attachments 1. P.C. Policy Statement. 2. P.C. Minutes 3. P.C. Staff Report/Attachments 4. Correspondence a/pcsrint 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 POLICY STATEMENT P.C. 91-3 A POLICY STATEMENT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE LAND USE CATEGORY FOR "CHECK CASHING ESTABLISHMENTS" WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a hearing on November 19, 1991 and made the following Findings: A. Check Cashing is not defined in the definition section of the zoning ordinance and is not listed as a permitted use in any of the commercial categories; B. The categories of "retail" or "banking and financial institutions" are not applicable descriptions for "check cashing" because the type of use, range of transactions, security, service, and/or hours are not the same, with no product being sold; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby adopt the following policy: 1. Check Cashing Establishments are presently not included in - the permitted use list as contained in Article 8 of the Hermosa Beach Zoning Ordinance. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Di Monda,Marks,Merl,Suard NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Chmn.Ketz -CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Policy Statement P.C. 91-3 is a true and__complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, at their regular meeting of November 19, 1991. Robert B. Marks, Vice Chairman V2jiij/Cq / Date a/pscheck 3 Michae Schubach, Secretary 84C/(ORO(/ND AI/ITER/4Z to add educational facilities into the category. Chmn. Ketz fe ti\e Commission should be handling all as one package, rather an des gnating certain items as non -conforming, asking to reaso for addressing this item at this time. Mr. Schubach stated this item was a priority request from City Council, suggesting the Commission might make a recommendation for continuance to allow investigation as to what\City properties should be designated as other than open space. Comm., Di Monda stated lot coverage and parking coverage, and signage, reviews by the Planning Commission should be items for discussion at the Joint Meeting. MOTION by Chmm. Ket , seconded by Comm Marks,/to continue SS 91-3/ TEXT 91-2 and make this an item for discussion at the Joint Meeting to be held in December `1\991. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Comms. None None None Di Monda Marks HEARING �f / FOURTH QUARTER GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT. Mr. Schubach stated the law requires the C. ission amend the Gen- eral Plan four times/a year. Staff suggests he private project at 64 10th Street be changed from zone C-2 to R-2 :nd from GC to MD. MOTION by Chmm/Ketz, seconded by Comm Merl, to lace the Fourth Quarter Gene al Plan Amendment on the agenda. AYES: Comma. Di Monda, Marks, Merl and Chmn. Ket NOES: None ABSTA : None ABS 'T: None Merl and Chmn. Ketz STAFF ITEMS A. MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE INTERPRETATION OF CHECK CASHING USE. Mr. Schubach stated a need to interpret the Zoning Ordinance in regard to check cashing as a requested use exists, stating the permitted use list is not specific, stating "banking and financial institutions". Staff queried the Police Department which Mr. Schubach defined for the Commission. He stated Staff's concern is the lack of a specific statement stating it is a permitted use. He noted the Building Department has held applications but not issued any permits until an interpretation is available. Chmn. Ketz felt it is not a banking or financial institution and lacks comparable security or service. Mr. Lee suggested the Commission note the facts supporting the belief the stated classifications are not applicable and direct Staff to prepare a resolution for the Commission's review and adoption. P.C.Minutes 11/7/91 MOTION by Chmm. Ketz, seconded by Comm Merl, that "retail, banking or financial" is not an applicable description, because the type of use, range of transactions, security, service, hours are not the same, with no product being sold. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl and Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: . None ABSENT: None B. MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE INTERPRETATION IN REGARDS TO COMBINE LOTS ON 30TH STREET. Chmn.'Ketz abstained due to her principle residence location.: Comm. Marks assumed the Chair. Mr. Schubach stated this item .was done but not completed, the merge was not done because the /block was already more than 80% split. The applicant requested he'be able to demolish the "existing home and build individual homes/ of each lot. Mr. Schubach explained the particulars of this request, including adjacent lots with the Commissioners. Comm. Di Monda ascertained the Commission is\being asked to force lots to merge, commenting the lots should not, be forced to merge, to which Chmn. Marks and Mr. Schubach agreed.\ A courtesy Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Marks at 10:33 p.m. Mr. Mark Nobel, 255 30tii,Street, pre6ented photographs of the property to the Commission., explaining the footprint on the properties, stating his belief\that splitting of double lots have a negative impact on the neighborhood, for which Chmn. Marks asked an explanation. Mr. Nobel felt new building's height and bulk being built in a crowded area creates a, negative impact and requested double lots not be allowed to' split' and that double -lot property owners should not be allowed,a wind fall. Comm. Di Monda stated he didn't not see a negative impact, feeling the four remaining property owners should be allowed to split their ..properties as other had previously one. The Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Marks at 1613388 p.m. MOTION by Chmm. D Monda, seconded by Comm Merl, t• confirm Staff's interpretation. AYES: ' Comms. Di Monda, Marks, and Merl NOES: None ABSTAIN: Chmn. Ketz ABSENT:// None OF LOT MERGER ORDINANCE Mr. ee rendered the opinion, after research, that this item c ap•-aled within a 10 -day period of the Commission'sdecision. hmn. Ketz assumed the Chair. 5 P.C.Minutes 11/7/91 MOTION by Chmm. Ketz, seconded by Comm Merl, that "retail, banking or financial" is not an applicable description, because the type of use, range of transactions, security, service, hours are not the same, with no product being sold. AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl and Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None B. MEMORANDUM REGARDING THE INTERPRETATION OF LOT MERGER ORDINANCE IN REGARDS TO COMBINE LOTS ON 30TH STREET. Chmn. Ketz abstained due to her principle residence location. Comm. Marks assumed the Chair. Mr. Schubach stated this item was done but not completed, the merge was not done because theblock was already more than 80% split. The applicant requested he be able to demolish the existing home and build individual homes/of each lot. Mr. Schubach explained the particulars of this request, including adjacent lots with the Commissioners. Comm. Di Monda ascertained the Commission is being asked to force lots to merge, commenting the lots should not be forced to merge, to which Chmn. Marks and Mr. Schubach agreed. ,, A courtesy Public Hearing opened by Chmn. Marks at 10:33 p.m. Mr. Mark Nobel, 255 30th'. Street, presented photographs of the property to the Commission, explaining the footprint on the properties, stating his belief -,that splitting of double lots have a negative impact on the neighborhood, for which Chmn. Marks asked an explanation. Mr. Nobel felt new building's height and bulk being built in a crowded area creates a.. negative impact and requested double lots not be allowed to split.. and that double -lot property owners should not be allowed.a wind fall. Comm. Di Monda stated he didn't not see a negative impact, feeling the four remaining property owners should be allowed to split their properties as other had previously done. The Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Marks at 10:,3388 p.m. MOTION by Chmm. Di Monda, seconded by Comm Merl, to confirm Staff's interpretation. / / AYES: /Comms. Di Monda, Marks, and Merl NOES: / None ABSTAIN: // Chmn. Ketz ABSENT:, None / Mr.ee rendered the opinion, after research, that this item c. be ap aled within a 10 -day period of the Commission's decision. hmn. Ketz assumed the Chair. P.C.Minutes 11/7/91 aring opened by Vice-Chmn. Marks at 9:29 p.m. No o e wished to address the Commission regarding this matter. Hearin closed by Vice -Churn. Marks at 9:29 p.m. Vice-Chmn. hardship in details had n the Zoning Ordi asked if a zoni fathered" in, to clause" were in t Commission's "hands" Tentative Map presents the legislation to dev order to review the Government Code relating to the extent to which ested rights prior to the Commission's that if"the project is not completed on /"the Commission does not have to tior to May 1992, certain items ct once the extension has been Marks asked how an investment company/could have obtaining a construction loan. Mr. Schubach stated t been obtained, because no changes have been made in ance, Staff recommends continuance/ Comm. Di Monda '`-g change were made, would this' item be "grand- ich Mr. Schubach stated only if a "grandfather e ordinance. Comm. Di/Monda asked if the ould not be tied. Mr./ Lee noted the Vesting ome complications; explaining the intent of lopers. Mr. Li' requested deferment in developers would be given decision. Mr. Schubach note and returns for another exten grant that extension. However, cannot be imposed upon the- prof approved. / Comm. Suard and Mr. Schubach discuss changes within the subject/area, which stated he would like to grant an six mont Commission to be aware/df exactly what the regard to the Housing Improvement Program action would be appz.opriate. Vice -Churn. Marks stated he had found construc on loans are no problem to obtain at this time, with lower interesrates. the possibility of zoning as slight. Comm. Di Monda s' extension to allow the ity is considering with Mr. Lee agreed this MOTION by Co . Di Monda, seconded by Comm. Suard, to .pprove a six month exte sion of a Conditional Use Permit for 'e two -unit condomini. at 829 15th Street. AYES: NOES. WABS IN: ENT: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl, Suard Marks None Chmn. Ketz PS 91-3 -- A POLICY STATEMENT REGARDING THE LAND USE CATEGORY OF "CHECK CASHING ESTABLISHMENTS". Recommended Action: To adopt a policy statement interpreting the check cashing establishments are currently not on the permitted use list and do not fall under "retail" or "banking and financial institution" categories. Mr. Schubach noted this is a formality matter, having been requested by City Council to adopt a Policy Statement. The. Commission previously made determination on this item, and Staff recommends Policy Statement adoption. Hearing opened by Vice-Chmn. Marks. at 9:39 p.m. —6— P.C.Minutes 11/19/91 No one wished to address the Commission regarding this matter. Hearing closed by Vice -Chinn. Marks at 9:29 p.m. Comm. Marks asked if a check cashing category needed to be created, to which Mr. Schubach responded yes, if it were to be a permitted use. Comm. Marks asked if the people conducting the check cashing would be monitored or controlled. Mr. Schubach responded the Com- mission may request background checks before approval. Mr. Lee noted that if there are concerns about the type of use, the Commission may consider this as a C.U.P. permitted use within the commercial zones, requiring adequate information to assure checks and balances as to the type of use. Comm. Di Monda noted the Commission is not adding check cashing as_a permitted use. MOTION by Comm. Merl, seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to approve the Policy Statement. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl, Suard None None Chmn. Ketz - -- STITEMS z After di cussion with attendees, Vice-Chmn. Marks declared,/for the convenienc of the audience, Staff Items would be reviewed out of sequence. PETITION TO RED CE THE set back ON 2700 BLOCK OF HERMOSA AVENUE. Mr. Schubach stated taff received a petition rom block residents requesting the set b ck be reduced from' to 3`-, as it is inconsistent with othe City blocks and/a hardship for these residents. Mr. Schubach fined the his,Ory ry of the establishment of the individual R-3 Zon- block see backs, stating changing current set backs would di = t from historical precedence and resultant development patterns, anA requires unanimous owners' consent. Zones R-2 and R-1_ have " ecific setbacks required. He stated that if charges start to •e blade, all owners should then be allowed to have same minimum t backs which in some cases is zero (0). Receive and file is `r -commended Staff. Alternatives are to notify petitioners 1-y privately itiate the amendment, following -procedures, o a Zoning Amendment •iay be initiated. Comm. Di Monda dete ined an established set ba would have to be built in with a d veway, discussing lot sizes an' lot development with Mr. Schubac . Comm. Di Monda recommended Recei e and File. Hearing ope -d by Vice-Chmn. Marks at 9:48 p.m. Bob Stro ee, representing Mary Jo Blue (2704 Hermosa), stat:d Mary Jo ci ulated a petition signed by every property owner o the bloc-, giving a copy of the petition to the Commission. He di- ussed the variety in set backs, displaying photographs of t 00, 2900, 3000, 3100 and 3200 blocks. He explained Ms. Blue -7- P.C.Minutes 11/19/91 No one wished to address the Commission regarding this matter. Hearing closed by Vice-Chmn. Marks at 9:29 p.m. Comm. Marks asked if a check cashing category needed to be created, to which Mr. Schubach responded yes, if it were to be a permitted use. Comm. Marks asked if the people conducting the check cashing would be monitored or controlled. Mr. Schubach responded the Com- mission may request background checks before approval. Mr. Lee noted that if there are concerns about the type of use, the Commission may consider this as a C.U.P. permitted use within the commercial zones, requiring adequate information to assure checks and balances as to the type of use. Comm. Di Monda noted the Commission is not adding check cashing as -a permitted use. MOTION by Comm. Merl, seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to approve the Policy Statement. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Merl, Suard None None Chmn. Ketz - -- N STA E. ITEMS After dis`ussion with attendees, Vice-Chmn. Marks declared,rfor the conveniences of the audience, Staff Items would be reviewed out of PETITION TO REDE THE set back ON 2700 BLOCK OF HERMOSA AVENUE. Mr. Schubach statedtaff received a petition from block residents requesting the set back be reduced from LO' to 3', as it is inconsistent with othe City blocks and/a hardship for these residents. Mr. Schubach fined the history of the establishment of the individual R-3 Zon block set! backs, stating changing current set backs would di t from historical precedence and resultant development patterns, and requires unanimous owners' consent. Zones R-2 and R-1. have./ pecific set._.backs required. He stated that if charges start to be Made, all owners should then be allowed to have same minimum backs which in some cases is zero (0). Receive and file is t commended Staff. Alternatives are to notify petitioners '=y privately itiate the amendment, following procedures, o a Zoning Amendment uay be initiated. Comm. Di Monda dete fined an established set ba• would have to be built in with a d veway, discussing lot sizes anlot development with Mr. Schubac . Comm. Di Monda recommended Recei e and File. Hearing ope -d by Vice-Chmn. Marks at 9:48 p.m. Bob Stro ee, representing Mary Jo Blue (2704 Hermosa), stat:d Mary Jo ci ulated a petition signed by every property owner o the bloc-, giving a copy of the petition to the Commission. He di- ussed the variety in set backs, displaying photographs of t 00, 2900, 3000, 3100 and 3200 blocks. He explained Ms. Blue sequence. - 7- P.C.Minutes 11/19/91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT. MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning From: Patricia Stoops - Assistant Planner Subject:Interpretation of Check Cashing establishments permitted use list Date: October 31, 1991 Commission in reference to An interpretation has been requested from the Planning Commission as to whether or not a check cashing establishment can be considered as either a retail use or a banking/financial institution on the permitted use list of the Zoning Code. Neither requires a conditional use permit. When queried regarding possible Police/public safety concerns associated with check cashing only businesses, the Police Department expressed the following preliminary concerns, subject to change, contingent upon the Planning Department/Planning Commission's actions on the matter. Potential draw to the community of a service clientele that is unable to complete banking transactions through traditional banking services and/or savings and loan institutions. Potential increase in police service requirements associated with the operations of such a business, (e.g., passing of fraudulent documents, stolen financial instruments, etc.). Potential adverse impact on surrounding commercial and residential areas arising from the nature of business and clientele associated with the operation of business. The Planning Department concurs, and as such, recommends that a conditional use permit be required if such a use is permitted in order to mitigate the above mentioned negative impact potential to the community. g 12a LA MANCHA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 11440 SAN VICENTE BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90049 (213) 820-0655 November 19, 1991 The Members of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: 524 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach, CA Classification of Check Cashing Use Dear Council Members: 191 The purpose of this letter is to request that you reconsider the decision of the Planning Commission at its meeting of November 7, 1991 regarding the classification of a check cashing use within the City of Hermosa Beach. As you know, under Article 8. Sec. 8-1. of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code no building shall be used for any purpose in a C -zone except as specifically provided in Article 8. Sections 8-2. through 8-4. of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code specifi- cally enumerate the uses permitted in each commercial zone. The use of "check cashing" is not enumerated as a permitted use in any commercial zone. At the November 7, 1991 meeting the Plan- ning Commission considered whether a check cashing use fits within the definitions of either a retail use or a banking/financial institution on the permitted use list of the Zoning Code. The Planning Commission determined that a check cashing use is neither a retail use nor a banking/financial in- stitution. With respect to the specific tenancy currently proposed for the subject property it should be noted that in addition to check cashing services the following services would be provided: (i) postal box rentals, (ii) sales of money orders, (iii) faxing and copying services, and (iv) additional related services. The subject property is zoned C-3, which is the most permissive commercial zone in Hermosa Beach. The uses permitted in a C-3 zone include all uses permitted in the C-1 and C-2 zones (except residential uses) as well as the uses specifically permitted only in the C-3 Restricted Commercial zone. Postal box rentals (parcel delivery terminal) are permitted in a C-3 zone; photo copying services are permitted in a C-1 zone; and mimeographing services are permitted in C-3 zone. The Members of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach November 19, 1991 Page Two In connection with the check cashing classification issue we con- tacted several neighboring cities to ascertain how they classify a check cashing use. The results of our investigation are as follows: 1. Los Angeles. A check cashing use in considered to be a general retail use. 2. Torrance. Mr. Jeff Gibson, City Planner, advised me that Torrance considers check cashing and related services as a retail use. 3. Lomita. Mr. Richard Kawasaki, City Planner, advised me that Lomita considers check cashing a service or office use similar to a printer, which is considered a retail use. 4. Lawndale. Mr. Grant Taylor, City Planner, advised me that Lawndale considers a check cashing use, with related services, to be a personal services establishment similar to a banking institution. No conditional use permit is required to engage in a inguse in any of the jurisdictions listed above. In addition to the foregoing, you should be aware ing facts regarding the specific tenancy proposed: check cash - of the follow - 1. A lease dated October 17, 1991 has been executed with the tenant, Ms. Farideh Dorri. 2. The use specified in the lease is "check cashing, money orders and retail sale of related services, including postal box rentals and fax services." 3. On October 23, 1991 the City of Hermosa Beach Building Department approved plans for mansard and pole signs in- dicating "Checks Cashed". (Copies of the Permits along with receipts indicating payment of the permit fees are enclosed.) While we realize that issuance of the sign permits is not deter- minative of the issue at hand, that action did give the tenant the impression that her use would be allowed and she thereafter commenced spending money to complete the signs and store. As has been indicated, the subject property is located in a C-3 zone, the most permissive commercial zone in Hermosa Beach. We believe that the proposed use, which includes postal box rentals, copying and fax services as well as check cashing, and which will The Members of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach November 19, 1991 Page Three occupy a 886 sq. ft. store, would not be detrimental to the com- munity. Instead, the proposed use will benefit the community by providing necessary personal services (only one of which would be check cashing). In view of the foregoing, we respectively re- quest that the City Council classify the proposed use as a retail or financial/banking institution. It is our understanding that the classification issue discussed herein will not be the subject of a public hearing. If our un- derstanding is incorrect, please so advise us; otherwise, we look forward to receiving your decision. Thank you for your con- sideration. Very truly yours, LA MANCHA DEV LOPMENT COMPANY Mark sses Director of Real Estate Los Angeles Division Enclosures ME/jea cc: 'Michael Schubach, Director of Planning Steve Wisniewfki, City Manager Robert M. Ozell #14#411,9 CiPt405.4 meti .smIlrIF • • t E7) r47) nOVED OR CONSTRUCTION USW* CHANric3 TO THE .:iult.DiNG DEPT. FOP APPROVAL :HIS APPRoVAL OOES NOT WAIVE or 1-4,; Hrri urACH BLDG. .00E r;r:r.citiliv,..:mv.4 TS TOT rv:IialCALLY :oHOWN ON PLANS 11 PLAN CHECKER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••=m•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-••Trw.om••••••••• .0101 ..•••• er'cercer) i•Outt /Weli g e'• Weiptr wk.) 151-1Xo• 0/bCze;6•: 4°At,lf. 9.glas MEM Cita 141" Atret360,: co -2+ r.4. lc:A:20r I1es� i,e4+ 46, ISAI1, INFORMATION OR DEiIGH INDiCATEL HEREON IS PRELIMINARY ONLY. It IS SUB JioT TO MODIFICATION BY SURVEY ANI OPROYat, BY GOVERNING AGENCIES. — • . • NO - 9-9 1 SAT 2: 1 9 ! $83.75 Fees RECEIVED BY:. rs ,a u• ANY CONTRACTOR WHO WILL BE WORKING ON THE SIGN WILL NEED TO HAVE A HERMOSA BEACH BUSINESS LICENSE ON FILE. DATE: F' _ 0 3 ,43h/ • CONTRACTOR'S NAIL' HER..MMOSA LICENSE I, OWNER OF THE MOVE D .SCRIBED PROPERTY, AM AWARE OP THIS SIGN APPLI ON AND AUTHO - E THIS APPLICATION. I A.A'YE INFORMED THE ApFL , . PRE ' 'STING REQUIREMENTS. ' L af4 **s T. -,• DATE .***********AA*******“*************************� ACTION TAKEN BY THE BUSINESS LICENSE DEPARTMENT: APPROVED: % DATE: /' e3 q DISAPPROVED: REASON FOR DISAPPROVAL: DATE: REFERRED TO: DATE: OFFICIAL RECEIPT ACC, It 3daz- 9128448 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACHCASH nigkt CALIFORNIA • IECWED FROM 111E SLIM OF FOR 5,471� ooL►AR,s I S3- -15 St C -7n (Ui.c -- " .. S P.0 +4 DATE ,s OFFICIAL RECEIPT "a* 32- (6- CASH I 9128449 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Ix r -pLIS RECEIVED FR041 MESUYOf I i FOR CALIFORNIA G—1 c cf rut lextrrm t4 — 2-y Pc. 1-4 DTE /0 -7,3_ la X VALIDATION VALIDATION - .5 • • I 1 L TLC. IO. 3455043 )1 3 !PERIOR BT. rswoarn. OA. 91311 x3)34 1-O98: ~LETTER EDGE PAINTED 3/4' - -MASCO TRIM CAP EDGE 2) • . M 6:wi teitUt SPECIFICATIONS ..... • _ • . . ••••;-- %a.K. •-.4•10 • ..`i Custom boric fAdN tnc+d COnslmOO') wiled lo aamr+oie > leo& ' ', traowcx b ball Keecarw tnktn CalenOr lobe ouloonoboo enorna(OM pane+ iIuclors gat t 2) Acetic piostfc iota was le rn coo 'clip_ 3) - 3) Neon got ~la Nu;nindion svt 4) Conew syslittn wan Sas crow:Woes between seven and ions:crrner boar S) PK housing. 6) Vern Nylon anchors led *IOWA s 1cp bolls. 13 MM NEON CLASS 3' CN CENTERS fry 1,4 4V.4- • 3!. LIC. 110. 305 21001 SUPERIOR B' CHATSWORTH. OL. (818)341-0987 1 L ) 1 _'FT 3-1 1 r\ LI \ t 1 L nwr rt 18 p•IDItA,:kmq,- c.rIs.1•!•;‘•1 de• di.4— - - - ! • , t • ii : i f • : ..., • i . 111 E-71 r • .„......„..........1 T.) ......—..... ..•• - . n ,...... , ......i, -i_,•,,,f.- - L ••••-4. 111;i1i.1,„.`.-1 , I 1-- 1 [1'1 ZIC; - .1 t t r \ ' , - - ........ . i . ri 1 •-is -1...c•--e A Inlit ••%,1 i.... :war& im,...mgri \ ....."' II . . %.L../1.1 1. ju -, 1.-.1:1) i '-i:J 1 ‘6, • .•. tor, 2231PUO:114:21Vitowtaiti)11153I.04 • 0-- • • -6.‘0! • • ....IF:Z.-. -• • ICALS` • Re-X".i.2--.t.4. /fie e DA ' 321. 210 Cr (81 - ittfoir‘to.resaramora .tartwmatermommosias V.I.P. Mortgage f: anker Specializing in 1st & 2nd Trust Deed Business, Hard Money Loan and Refinancing TEL: (213) 325-2274 • FAX: (213) 539-3676 ( I' ESS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Civic Center, 1315 Valley Dr. Hermosa Beach, Ca. 90254 Oct. 29/91 OCT 0 1991 PLANNING DIRECTOR REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION AND APPROVAL OF MY CHECK CASHING BUSINESS. I request that you interpret the Definition of "Banking and Financial Institutions" to determine if it could include Check Cashing establi- shments. When I leased this place 524 Pacific Coast Hwy. in Hermosa Beach we were (the landlord and I) sure that it was no problem to have this kind of a business. I had the same kind in Gardena, L.A. Strip and now for 5 years in the City of Torrance without any problems. Will you Please approve my request and I will be eternally gratefull. Sincerely yours; PLWE Farideh-Dorri Berenjgani Owner. December 5, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of December 10, 1991 QUARTERLY REPORT ON GOALS IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council receive and file this quar- terly progress report on the Goals program. Background: The City Goals were approved March 12, 1991; Goal #4 "Clarify the Goals", included an objective to formalize a timetable and plan of action for the goals. Additionally, Council directed that quarterly progress reports be given. Analysis: The attached Goals Implementation Plan and Timetable was devel- oped from input from all City departments. Council is encouraged to suggest improvements in the format of the report to provide clarification/further direction on indi- vidual assignments, and to re-establish priorities, as appropriate. Attention to the Goals and their correct interpretation will be aided by Council reviews/quarterly updates. With continuing im- provements, this document will be a significant aid to staff in completing the directions of the Council. Respectfully, submitted, Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager SW/ld ABBREVIATED GOAL NO. ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVE Lead/Ass't #1 #2 1 2 3 FIN FIN ALL 4 FIN/CM 5 PLN 6 ALL/FIN IMPROVE FINANCIAL PIX - Improve audit/review procedures - "Bare Bones" budget launLo IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND TIMETABLE PLAN -Admin. memo re. tele- phone, utilities - Establish procedures for lease, citation revenue -Audits of at least one function/yr. to improve controls/performance -Continuous monitoring of expenses - Increase Sales Tax -Encourage Fiesta vendors revenue to report tax in H.B. - Crosscheck all business licenses w/sales tax reports - G.S. Officers reporting to Bus. Lic. unfamiliar business activity -Complete studies of -Identify misc. revenue, revenue develop appropriate fee, submit to City Council - Expedite completion of oil -Continue meetings with conditional use permit Oil Co. Proceed with CUP process IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF OPERATIONS - Increase service level without increasing staff -Hand-held ticket writers increase use/productivity standards Revised 12/5/91 'TIMETABLE BEGIN COMPLETE 8/91 CURRENT ACTIVITY DATE & NEXT STEPS COMPLETED Completed - 3/90 Complete 3/92 Discussions held with City audit firm On-going 7/91 9/91 Ongoing Ongoing 10/91 2/92 2/91 9/91 2/91 1/92 Ongoing 9/91 $400,000 reduced from 1991-92 budget 8/91 3/90 Council approved 7/91 9/91 Responsibility of new Sr. Acct. Clk. Begin after audit/ financial report In progress Completed draft conditions, waiting for application submittal Ticket writers implemented; standards being expanded ABBREVIATED GOAL NO. ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVE Lead/Ass't #2 (Cont.) 7 FIN/PER 8 PS/GS 9 PS 10 PER 11 ALL/CM 12 GS 13 PER 14 GS/CLK - Computerize payroll and personnel -Review coordinating P.D. with City computer operations - Contracting of Police and Fire - Productivity incentives for employees -Increase use of product- ivity measurements - Implement new computer system -Review Workers' Comp cost - Storage of City records PLAN - Bring current computerized payroll in-house. - Include w/overall data processing plan - Completed for Fire and Police. - Survey cities & contact League for samples of incentives offered - Include in monthly activity reports TIMETABLE BEGIN COMPLETE CURRENT ACTIVITY DATE & NEXT STEPS COMPLETED Contingent upon over- all data processing plan 12/91 In progress 7/91 3/92 2/91 Ongoing 3/91 12/91 - Work with W.C. administrator to review medical providers & internal procedures in processing W.C. claims - Set up periodic reports to monitor trends Ongoing - Develop RFP, select consultant, obtain employee commitment to implement, set timeline, secure Council OK Reports completed; contracting for services rejected by Council 10/22/91 In progress. Survey completed & info. received from League 91-92 monthly activity reports include add'l measures In progress Hired new proactive claims administrator Workplace safety inspec- ions & training started. Semi-annual reports to be agendized for Council review In progress l' ABBREVIATED GOAL NO. ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVE Lead/Ass't #2 (Cont.) 15 PW/CR #3 16 PS #4 17 CM/PER 18 CR 19 CM #5 20 GS - Maintenance of beach bathrooms IMPROVE POLICE OPERATIONS - Civilian Enforcement Officers CLARIFY THE GOALS - Update City Vision statement - Written Code of Ethical Conduct - Timetables, plan of action for objectives ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS -Telephone access - human interface, direct dial PLAN Ongoing -PW- Weekly inspections -Monitor performance and increasing account- ability -Establish Council sub- committee to review & make recommendation to full Council. -Presented to Council at May 14 mtg. -Get draft department plans and timetables in consistent format, finalize and present to Council -Formal recommendation to Council 6/25 TIMETABLE CURRENT ACTIVITY DATE BEGIN COMPLETE & NEXT STEPS COMPLETED Reports are completed and regularly submitted to the County 6/30/91 10/91 6/92 Performance monitor- ing a continuous practice...civilian enforcement officers now being considered as part of cost saving by the Police/Gen. Svcs. study committee. 7/91 10/91 Submitted to City Council at 9/10 mtg. 9/10/91 Completed & distributed 5/14/91 6/91 9/91 Presented 8/27/91 and 8/27/91 approved for quarterly updates 6/91 9/92 Council direction to look at inexpensive system in 1 yr (when market advances are available.) ABBREVIATED GOAL NO. ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVE Lead/Ass't #6A 21 CR 22 CR 23 CR 24 PER 25 PLN/GS 26 PLN 27 PLN 28 PLN - "Welcome to meeting" brochure - Improve T.V. capabilities for Council Chambers - Replay Council meetings at new times - Participate with school civics program coordinator UPGRADE DOWNTOWN - Assist with VPD and Downtown Revitalization Committee - Implement use -change parking policy -Consider closing off Pier Head for pedestrian mall -Improve property maintenance downtown PLAN TIMETABLE BEGIN COMPLETE -Complete printed brochure 5/91 - Discuss as part of renewal 8/91 process. Rec. equipment upgrade package - Implement by May, 1991 - Contact S.C.P.C. and develop programs Ongoing -PLN- provide requested data and input - GS-acts as staff liaison to Bd. of Pkg. Place Comm. - VPD has advertising campaign and is installing landscap- ing, equipment, adding park- ing places -Include in Land Use Element - Include in Land Use Element -Include in Land Use Element CURRENT ACTIVITY DATE & NEXT STEPS COMPLETED 9/91 6/91 draft completed 2/92 New Cable TV coordin- ator hired 8/19/91 5/91 Replays added Friday 5/91 nights. Weekend replays not possible w/cable TV1 staffing limitations In progress - 1/92 Student of month pro- clamation initiated Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing 12/91 12/91 12/91 2/92 Target date 2/92 Target date 2/92 Target date GOAL NO. ASSIGNMENT Lead/Ass't ABBREVIATED OBJECTIVE #6A (Cont.) 29 CR/PW/PLN -Do something "interesting" with pier #6B 30 PS/FIN 31 PW/PLN/CR 32 PS 33 BLD 34 PW 35 BLD/PW - Cost effectiveness of down- town enforcement - Cooperate with RUDAT process - Review increasing police foot patrol ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES - Implement trash enclosure enforcement - Promote water conservation - Implement source reduction and recycling PLAN TIMETABLE CURRENT ACTIVITY DATE BEGIN COMPLETE & NEXT STEPS COMPLETED - Coordinate Coastal Conser- vancy & R/UDAT design & 3/91 6/92 funding efforts - PW- Determine legal limits -Review cost effectiveness of resources allocated to downtown enforcement -Attend meeting when requested and provide input -Report on need to increase foot patrol or to maintain current deployment Get matter reviewed by City Atty. Mandatory compliance deadline of June/Aug. 1992 -Proclaim May as water awareness Month 7/91 2/92 Ongoing 7/91 Conservancy com- mitted funds for preliminary design work. Information obtained Scheduled for Jan. 28, 1992 Council meeting Regularly attending & responding to requests; coordinating with Pier projects 7/91 2/92 Scheduled for Jan. 28, 1992 Council meeting 3/91 8/92 Ordinance to allow administrative waiver being prepared by City Atty. -Curbside and multi -family recycling Implementation of commercial recycling where feasible Ongoing Via Cal. Water & West Basin, avail- able water kits, promoting via Cable TV, conserving City Uses 6/91 Implemented 1/92 Draft SRRE & HHWE Ongoing 6/91 ABBREVIATED GOAL NO. ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVE Lead/Ass't #6B (Cont.) 36 PLN #S 37 CM #9A 38 PLN #9B 39 GS 40 BLD/GS - Improve tree preservation to replace trees COMPLETE SOUTH SCHOOL PURCHASE -Finalize purchase of South School RESOLVE BILTMORE ISSUE PARKING IMPROVEMENT -Analyze residential park- ing permit program - Study parking solutions on PCH PLAN begin implementation of SRRE programs following approval of element - Include in Land Use and conservation Elements - Complete negotiations, decide funding, open escrow - Process zone changes consistent with Coastal Commission decision - Will perform study for the inclusion of addi- tional neighborhoods TIMETABLE BEGIN COMPLETE -BLD- Meet with Parking 3/91 Lot "E" group by 4/10/91 Develop alternatives to increase public parking & hold add't mtg. for con- sensus rec. to Council by Present alternatives to Council CURRENT ACTIVITY DATE & NEXT STEPS COMPLETED presented to City Council 11/26/91 2/92 In progress; also condition of approval for condos (CUP & PDP processes) 6/91 Negotiations completed 6/91 6/91. Close of escrow 9/91 no earlier than 1/92. 6/91 Completed 6/91 7/91 Scheduled for adoption 8/27/91. Done Drawings developed for various restriping/land swap/parking structure scenarios. Met with group a second time on October 30, 1991 to form consensus for design of Lot E. Proposed lease with GTE is with City 9/91 Atty. for review. i ABBREVIATED GOAL NO. ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVE Lead/Ass,t 411A 41 GS 42 GS 43 GS 411B 44 PLN 45 PLN 46 PLN 47 PLN 411C 48 PLN GENERAL BERVICEB REORGANIZATION -Analyze contracting of Parking and Animal Control - Reduce cost of parking enforcement while main- taining appropriate service - Explore volunteers for downtown parking enforce- ment ZONING STANDARDS - Review lot coverage - Review parking requirements -Review open space standards - Review setback and height requirements LONG RANGE PLANS -Implement housing and circulation elements PLAN - Included in the Sheriffs study - Included in the Sheriffs study -Review number of super- visory positions - This exploration will be conducted after the final resolution is made concerning the upcoming Sheriffs study. TIMETABLE CURRENT ACTIVITY DATE BEGIN COMPLETE & NEXT STEPS COMPLETED 10/91 Rejected by Council Oct. 22, 1991. 9/91 12/91 1.5 Tech Aide positions eliminated, & G.S. Dir. position filled on interim basis. 9/91 12/91 This item included in the General Services/Police Department study due in February, 1992. -Prepare report on plac- 7/91 ing measures on ballot for residential. Review commercial standards in Land Use Element revision. - If advisory measures pass in Nov., implement HIP program. Circulation Element is part of CIP except transportation programs which are mostly imple- mented, i.e., MAX and Wave. Additional market - 1/92 2/92 12/92 9/91 ABBREVIATED GOAL NO. ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVE Lead/Ass't #11C (Cont.) 49 PLN 50 PW 51 PS -Update General Plan Elements - Implement Capital Improve- ment program - Implement Emergency Pre- paredness Plan #14 IMPROVE STRAND SAFETY 52 PS/PW #15 53 PLN COMPLETE COASTAL PERMIT PLAN - Restore local permit authority PLAN TIMETABLE CURRENT ACTIVITY DATE BEGIN COMPLETE & NEXT STEPS COMPLETED ing will be accomplished. Ongoing - Continue to revise elements. - Quarterly and annual reports provided - Prepare emergency prepar- edness manual; participate in preparedness exercises; obtain & maintain stock of emergency supplies - Improve enforcement of walk zone area; imple- ment plan to reduce speeding bicycles and enforce 10 mph signs installed -Reconstruct w/bikeway funds 3/91 12/92 In progress - In progress 7/91 2/92 Manual completed and distributed; partici- pated in 2 Countywide exercises, will con- tinue participation; acquisition of emer- gency supplies in progress 6/91 12/91 Completed, but on- going enforcement of both items. 11/26/91 7/3/91 8/1/91 Proper signage installed coordination conducted with judge, radar guns obtained. 1/92 4/92 -Submit application to Coastal Commission 12/91 In design In progress LA MANCHA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 11440 SAN VICENTE BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90049 (213) 820-0655 RECEIVED DEC 0 9 1991 CITY MGR. OFFICE December 6, 1991 VIA MESSENGER The Members of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: 524 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach, CA Classification of Check Cashing Use Dear Council Members: In our November'19, 1991 correspondence (a copy of which is at- tached hereto as Exhibit "A") we requested that the City Council reconsider the decision of the Planning Commission at its Novem- ber ovember 7, 1991 meeting regarding classification of a check cashing use in Hermosa Beach. Apparently because a check cashing use is not listed as a permitted use in any commercial zone in Hermosa Beach the Planning Department has taken the position that such a use is not currently permitted in the City. Their position was adopted by the Planning Commission at its November 7, 1991 meet- ing when the Commission determined that a check cashing use is neither a retail nor banking/financial institution use. Our further analysis of this issue has shown that although Ar- ticle 8. Sec. 8-1 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code provides that no building shall be used for any purpose in a C -zone except as specifically provided in Article 8. (i.e., unless the use is specifically listed as a permitted use within a C -zone), in fact, there are numerous businesses in operation in Hermosa Beach that are not uses specifically permitted in a C -zone. Those uses in- clude, but are not limited to, the following: Carpet Cleaners Cabinet Makers Sherman Carpet Cleaning S.C. Carpet Cleaning New Image Carpet Cleaning Chimney Cleaning Okell's D.J.'s Bait & Tackle Asbestos Removal Just Fishing A -Mark Asbestos Inspection, Inc. Self Storage Bay Self Storage Cypress Woodworks Pacific Sun Cabinets Top Drawer Custom Woodwork Michael Johnson Fine Wood Fishing Equipment SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION lh The Members of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach December 6, 1991 Page Two In addition to the four (4) neighboring cities we previously con- tacted to ascertain their treatment of check cashing uses (Los Angeles, Torrance, Lomita and Lawndale - all of which consider a check cashing use to be a general retail use or personal service use similar to a banking institution) we have contacted the Plan- ning Departments in Hawthorne and Gardena. Ms. Kelly Klan, City Planner for Hawthorne, advised me that Hawthorne considers check cashing a retail use. Mr. Bob Baca, Chief Zoning Administrator for Gardena, advised me that Gardena considers check cashing a commercial service use which is subject to the same parameters as a retail use. In view of the foregoing we once again submit that it is both reasonable and appropriate for the City Council to interpret the Zoning Code as allowing a check cashing use which is ancillary to providing services of postal box rentals, copying and facsimile transmissions without requiring a text amendment to the Zoning Code. As has been indicated, there is more than ample precedent for such an interpretation. We look forward to receiving your affirmative response. Very truly yours, LA MANCHA,D4VELOPMENT COMPANY 4f1sir / Mark sses Director of Real Estate Los Angeles Division ME/jea Attachment cc: Michael Schubach, Director of Planning Steve Wisniewfki, City Manager Robert M. Ozell Exhibit "A" LA MANCHA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 11440 SAN VICENTE BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90049 (213) 820-0655 November 19, 1991 The Members of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: 524 Pacific Coast Highway, Hermosa Beach, CA Classification of Check Cashing Use Dear Council Members: The purpose of this letter is to request that you reconsider the decision of the Planning Commission at its meeting of November 7, 1991 regarding the classification of a check cashing use within the City of Hermosa Beach. As you know, under Article 8. Sec. 8-1. of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code no building shall be used for any purpose in a C -zone except as specifically provided in Article 8. Sections 8-2. through 8-4. of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code specifi- cally enumerate the uses permitted in each commercial zone. The use of "check cashing" is not enumerated as a permitted use in any commercial zone. At the November 7, 1991 meeting the Plan- ning Commission considered whether a check cashing use fits within the definitions of either a retail use or a banking/financial institution on the permitted use list of the Zoning Code. The Planning Commission determined that a check cashing use is neither a retail use nor a banking/financial in- stitution. With respect to the specific tenancy currently proposed for the subject property it should be noted that in addition to check cashing services the following services would be provided: (i) postal box rentals, (ii) sales of money orders, (iii) faxing and copying services, and (iv) additional related services. The subject property is zoned C-3, which is the most permissive commercial zone in Hermosa Beach. The uses permitted in a C-3 zone include all uses permitted in the C-1 and C-2 zones (except residential uses) as well as the uses specifically permitted only in the C-3 Restricted Commercial zone. Postal box rentals (parcel delivery terminal) are permitted in a C-3 zone; photo copying services are permitted in a C-1 zone; and mimeographing services are permitted in C-3 zone. The Members of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach November 19, 1991 Page Two In connection with the check cashing classification issue we con- tacted several neighboring cities to ascertain how they classify a check cashing use. The results of our investigation are as follows: 1. Los Angeles. A check cashing use in considered to be a general retail use. 2. Torrance. Mr. Jeff Gibson, City Planner, advised me that Torrance considers check cashing and related services as a retail use. 3. Lomita. Mr. Richard Kawasaki, City Planner, advised me that Lomita considers check cashing a service or office use similar to a printer, which is considered a retail use. 4. Lawndale. Mr. Grant Taylor, City Planner, advised me that Lawndale considers a check cashing use, with related services, to be a personal services establishment similar to a banking institution. No conditional use permit is required to engage in a check cash- ing use in any of the jurisdictions listed above. In addition to the foregoing, you should be aware of the follow- ing facts regarding the specific tenancy proposed: 1. A.lease dated October 17, 1991 has been executed with the tenant, Ms. Farideh Dorri. 2. The use specified in the lease is "check cashing, money orders and retail sale of related services, including postal box rentals and fax services." 3. On October 23, 1991 the City of Hermosa Beach Building Department approved plans for mansard and pole signs in- dicating "Checks Cashed". (Copies of the Permits along with receipts indicating payment of the permit fees are enclosed.) While we realize that issuance of the sign permits is not deter- minative of the issue at hand, that action did give the tenant the impression that her use would be allowed and she thereafter commenced spending money to complete the -signs and store. As has been indicated, the subject property is located in a C-3 zone, the most permissive commercial zone in Hermosa Beach. We believe that the proposed use, which includes postal box rentals, copying and fax services as well as check cashing, and which will The Members of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach November 19, 1991 Page Three occupy a 886 sq. ft. store, would not be detrimental to the com- munity. Instead, the proposed use will benefit the community by providing necessary personal services (only one of which would be check cashing). In view of the foregoing, we respectively re- quest that the City Council classify the proposed use as a retail or financial/banking institution. It is our understanding that the classification issue discussed herein will not be the subject of a public hearing. If our un- derstanding is incorrect, please so advise us; otherwise, we look forward to receiving your decision. Thank you for your con- sideration. Very truly yours, LA MANCHA DEV LOPMENT COMPANY A77''7 Mark sses Director of Real Estate Los Angeles Division Enclosures ME/j ea cc: Michael Sct•ubach, Director of Planning Steve W snlewfki, City Manager Rc. )ert M. Ozell December 2, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council December 10, 1991 SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM VONS TO RE -STRIPE THE PLAZA HERMOSA PARKING LOT TO PROVIDE 307 COMPACT PARKING PURPOSE: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PARKING TO LEGALIZE PIZZA DELIVERY SERVICE FROM INSIDE VONS Recommendation Approve the request by minute order. Background The 1985 Development Agreement regarding the operation and maintenance of the Public Parking Facility at Plaza Hermosa requires approval of the City_ of Hermosa Beach Parking Authority for any additions and improvements. (See Section 6 of the attached Agreement) "RoundTable Pizza" has been in operation inside the Von's grocery store since August 12, 1991. The delivery service offered in conjunction with the take-out service resulted in a change of the use of a portion of Vons from a market to a take-out restaurant. This requires either additional parking or Planning Commission approval of a Parking Plan. Vons, with the agreement of the property owner, has decided to pursue the option of increasing the parking by re -striping the lot to include compact -stalls. For further background please refer to the attached City Council staff report dated November 12, 1991. Analysis The proposed re -striping plan will increase the number of parking spaces for the entire facility (first and second level) from 432 to 463 parking spaces. This would be accomplished by providing 136 compact parking stalls (7'6" X 15') and by striping 12 parking spaces behind Aaron Brothers. Section 1158(c) of the zoning ordinance allows up to 30% of parking stalls to be of compact size. - Staff has reviewed the proposed plan and found that it complies with the City's minimum parking standards, and further it provides the adequate number of stalls to make up for an existing deficiency, and to satisfy the needs of Round Table Pizza. (See the attached parking summary) If this plan is carried out 136 of the 294 upper level parking stalls will be compact, while all 169 of the lower level stalls 11 will remain standard size. No stalls are proposed to be converted to compact size in the lower level because the existing structural supports make it impossible to increase parking by reducing stall sizes. Staff supports the use of compact spaces, especially when parking capacity increases. In this case the proposed plan is not ideal because all compact spaces will be in the more intensely used upper level lot. However, the plan complies with the provisions of the zoning ordinance and staff finds no reason to object to the proposal. Alternative Deny the request, and advise Vons to pursue the alternative of obtaining Parking Plan approval from the Planning Commission. The Commission has the authority to allow less than required parking, based on Section. 1170, Consolidated off-streeet parking, which allows parking spaces for various uses to be reduced in number and computed at one (1) space per 250 square feet of gross floor area when consolidated in a retail shopping center of over 10,000 square feet. CONCUR: ey L. Staten Acting General Services Director Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Attachments 1. Development Agreement 2. 11/12/91 Staff Report/Minutes 3. Parking Summary 4. Correspondence �! Michael Schubach Planning Director p/ccsr the Companies, Inc. November 27, 1991 City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Beach, CA 90254-3885 RE: Vons Store No. 110 715 Pier Avenue H3rmo3a Beach, CA Gentlemen: Vons Stores Pavilions Stores Tianguis Stores Jersevmaid Milk Products In order to comply with the City's requirement for additional parking spaces at the captioned location, we are requesting your review and approval of a revised parking lot layout, ten copies of which are enclosed. We would appreciate it if this item could be reviewed at the City Council Meeting on December 10, 1991. If approval is received, we will proceed to have the parking lot slurry coated and restriped the first week in January. If you have any questions, please give me a call at (818) 821-7041. Very truly yours, THE VONS COMPANIES, INC. Shirley OtBrien Property Manager Real Estate Department SO/mjo 110pkg.lso cc: Greg Peters qM The Vons Companies, Inc. • P.O. Box 3338, Los Angeles, CA 90051 618 Michillinda Avenue, Arcadia, CA 91007-6300 • Telephone: (818) 821-7000 -- 3 - 84C/(OR a1/ND MATER/A[ C AGREEMENT FOR AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKING FACILITY THIS AGREEMENT made as of March 20 , 1985 by and between THE PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a general law and municipal corporation ("Authority") and PCH -PIER HERMOSA PARTNERSHIP ("Operator"), a limited partnership. This Agreement is predicated upon the following facts: The Operator is a party to a certain Development Agreement, dated July 26, 1983, as amended (the "Development Agreement") with the Authority, as assignee of Alexander Haagen Development, which establishes certain rights and obligations of the Authority and Operator in connection with the Public Parking, Facility _ described below and the Operator and the Authority are parties to a Second Installment Sale Agreement. dated as of December 14, 1983 (the "Second Installment Sale Agreement") which also establishes certain rights and obligations of the parties with respect to the Public Parking Facility described below. The project area ("Project Area") includes a public parking facility ("Public Parking Facility") located between Pier Avenue and 16th Street in the City of Hermosa Beach adjacent to the Plaza Hermosa Shopping Center. The Public Parking Facility L/ consists of approximately 191,000 square feet of public parking space, including an underground parking structure, with a capacity of approximately 460 cars, which capacity shall not be reduced without the consent of both parties. For the benefit of the public and the Authority, the Authority and Operator have agreed to provide said property for improvement and use as parking and Operator has agreed to improve, operate and maintain said property in accordance with the Second Installment Sale Agreement. In order to implement said Agreement, the Authority and the Operator desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of providing for the operation and maintenance by the Operator of the Public Parking Facility. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreement herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. agrees to improve, operate and maintain the Public -Parking Facility situated in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Agreement to Operate. The Operator hereby Los Angeles, State of California, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth ("Agreement"), subject in all respect to the terms and conditions of the Second Installment Sale Agreement. Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect as of the date first --above written and shall HBCH/reg 5-- - 2 - tsc continue as long as the subject parking area is a Public Parking Facility. Section 3. Use. The Public Parking Facility shall be used, managed and operated by the Operator hereunder to provide free parking for the benefit of the Authority and the public. Section 4. Operation and Maintenance. The Operator shall assume and pay the entire cost of operation and maintenance of the Public Parking Facility. Such costs of operation and maintenance shall include, but not be limited to, administration, premiums for all required -insurance and repairs. Section 5. Repair. Operator shall perform the normal maintenance and repair of the Public Parking Facility and shall rebuild or restore same in the event of a casualty which Operator is required to insure against. Section 6. Additions and Itprovements. With the approval of the Authority, the Operator initially and during the term of this Agreement, may make or permit to be made, any addition or improvements to the Public Parking Facility, including_but not limited to those provided for hereinbelow, which are consistent with the City's Parking Authority standards and the Second Installment Sale Agreement and do not impair the utility of the facilities for use as public parking facilities, to attach fixtures, structures or signs thereto, to place any HBCH/reg G - 3 w-.. .:•- {.-cam. '- Y personal property on or in the Public Parking Facility, and to enclose the Public Parking Facility for security, provided the utility and use of the Public Parking Facility as a public parking facility is not unreasonably interfered with. Title to all such personal property or to fixtures which may be removed without damage to the Public Parking Facility._ shall remain in the Operator. Section 7. Lighting. All public parking areas shall be well illuminated. Section 8. Security. Appropriate security measures shall be provided by the Operator in the Public Parking.Facility, including, if necessary, contracting with the City for additional police services. Section 9. Policies and Rules. The Operator shall, in addition to the rules provided for in this Section 9, establish and maintain such general policies and regulations for the repair, management, maintenance and operation, and use of the Public Parking Facility consistent with the provisions of this Agreement and the standards established by the Authority for parking district properties as may be necessary. (a) Parking Availability. The Public Parking Facility shall be available for the identified use as set forth above provided the foregoing is subject to the following restrictions: - 4 HBCH/reg (1) The Public Parking Facility shall remain open to the public from 6:00 A.M. of each day, to 2:00 A.M. of the following day throughout the year, closing between the hours of 2:00 A.M. and 6:00 A.M. daily. (2) There shall be a limit of two hour parking only for upper level parking spaces provided that up to 50 spaces may have a 20 minute limit. (3) There shall be a limit of six hour parking only in the lower level of the parking structure as designated by the Operator. (4) The parking facility shall be open for parking to all members of the general public on a first-come, first-served basis, and there shall be no reservation of=parking spaces or areas -within the.parkirxg facility, including, without limitation, customers or employees of the Plaza Hermosa Shopping Center. (b) Posting Rules. The Operator will post signage in conspicuous places, including ingress and egress, identifying the Public Parking Facility as public parking, setting forth as HBCH/reg 5 appropriate, the rules herein described and directing vehicular and pedestrian circulation. (c) Vehicular Access. Vehicular access to and within the Public Parking Facility shall maximize internal circulation and serve all uses located in the Project Area and commercial areas and other uses adjacent to the area. (d) Pedestrian Circulation. Pedestrian circulation within the Public Parking Facility shall maximize access between parking areas and all uses within the Project Area, and commercial areas and other uses adjacent to the Project Area. Placement of ramps, stairways, elevators and escalators shall be conveniently located. (e) Operation Subject to Laws and Agreements. . The operation of the Public Parking Facility shall be subject to any other laws, regulations or rules of any governmental, authority which pay hereafter restrict or impose conditions upon the use and operation of the Public Parking Facility. (f) Enforcement of Parking Restrictions. The Operator shall provide for enforcement of the Rules and Regulations of the Public Parking Facility and issue citations to violators of posted parking restrictions. The Operator and City shall enter into an agreement to provide for enforcement. HBCH/reg 9 6 Section 10. Insurance. • (a) Obligation of Operator. The Operator shall at all times maintain or cause to be maintained with responsible insurers all such insurance on the Public Parking Facility which is customarily maintained with respect to properties of like character against accident to, loss of or damage to such properties. Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the Operator shall not be required to maintain or cause to be maintained more insurance than is specifically referred to below. The Operator shall during any period of construction and thereafter during the term of this Agreement maintain or cause to be maintained: HBCH/reg (1) worker's compensation insurance, builder's risk -all risk insurance, and such other insurance as may be required by.applicable- law or by the general conditions contained in the plans and specifications for.' the Public Parking Facility; (2) insurance covering 100% of the replacement cost of the Public Parking Facility during the course of construction and following completion in the event of fire, lightning, windstorm, earthquake, vandalism, malicious mischief and such other hazards, casualties —10- - 7 and contingencies as are normally and usually covered by extended coverage policies in effect in the locality where the Public Parking Facility is situated (including insurance against loss by flood if the Public Parking Facility is now or hereafter located in an area designated as being subject to the danger of flood); (3) public liability insurance in an amount deemed reasonably necessary from time to time by the Authority, but in no event less than $1-,000;000.00 for "single occurrence"; (4) property damage insurance in an amount deemed reasonably necessary from time to tire by the Authority, but in no event less than $500,000.00 for "single occurrence"; (5) such other policies of insurance, as the Authority, may reasonably require from time to time. _(b) General Provisions. ' All insurance provided under Subsection (a) of this Section 10 shall be for the benefit of Operator, Authority, and City, as named insured, during the term hereof. - 8 - HBCH/reg All insurance provided under Subsection (a) of this Section 10 shall be periodically reviewed by the parties for the. purpose of mutually increasing the minimum limits of such insurance, from time to time, to amounts which may be reasonably and customary for similar facilities of like size and operation. All insurance herein provided for under this Section 10 shall be effected under policies issued by insurers of recognized. responsibility, licensed or permitted to do business in the State of California. All policies or certificates issued by the respective insurers for insurance shall provide that such policies or certificates shall not be cancelled or materially changed without at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Authority and the City Attorney. At least thirty (30) days prior to expiration dates of expiring policies or contracts held by said Operator, copies of renewal or new policies or contracts or certificates shall be deposited with said Authority. Section 11. Liens. The Operator agrees to pay, when due, all sums of money that may become due for, or purporting to be due for, labor, services, materials, supplies or equipment alleged to have been furnished or to be furnished to or for the Operator in, upon or about the Public Parking Facility and which may be secured by mechanics' or materialmen's or other liens against the Public Parking Facility and/or the interest of the Operator of the Authority therein, and will cause each such lien HBCH/reg —/2-- 9 • • C - to be fully discharged and released at the time the performance of any obligation secured by such lien matures and/or becomes due; provided, however, that if Operator desires to contest any such lien, it may do so upon providing Authority with a bond or other lawful security such as a guarantee, in form and amount satisfactory to Authority, to guarantee payment of such lien and provided, further, that notwithstanding any such contest, if any such lien shall be reduced to final judgment and such judgment or such process as may be issued for the enforcement thereof is not promptly stayed, or if so stayed and said stay thereafter expires, then and in such event the Operator shall forthwith pay and discharge said judgment. Section 12. Law Governing. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, subject to the waivers, exclusions and provisions herein contained. Section 13. Authority Monitoring. The Operator shall furnish to the Authority such information as may reasonably be required in order for the Authority -to monitor operations of the Public Parking Facility and regulate the public parking service provided, consistent with the needs of the public, the community and the region. In particular, the design, construction and modification of the Public Parking Facility (and specifically the topics covered by paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 herein) shall be subject to approval by the Authority prior to implementation by the Operator. HBCH/reg - 10 - /2— s' • Section 14. Notices. All notices, statements, demands, requests, consents, approvals, authorizations, offers, agreements, appointments or designations hereunder by either party to the other shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given and served upon the other party, if sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: Authority: Operator: Parking Authority of The City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center Hermosa Beach, California 90254 PCH -Pier Hermosa Partnership 3500 Sepulveda Blvd. Manhattan Beach, California 90266 or at such other address as either party shall later designate for such purpose by written notice to the other party. Section 15. Waiver. The waiver by the Authority of any breach by the Operator of any term, covenant or condition hereof shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or`any other term, covenant or condition hereof. Section 16. Execution. This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed- shall be deemed to be an original, but all together shall constitute but one and the same Agreement, and it is also understood and agreed that separate counterparts of this Agreement may be separately executed by the Authority and the Operator, all with the same full force and effect as though the HBCH/reg same counterpart had been executed simultaneously by both the Authority and the Operator. Section 17. Validity. If any one or more of the terms, provisions, promise, covenants, conditions or option provisions of this Agreement shall to any extent be adjudged invalid, unenforceable, void or voidable for any reason whatsoever by a court of competent jurisdiction, each and all of the remaining terms, provisions, promises, covenants, -conditions, and option provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. Section 18. Binding Effect. This Agreement, and the terms, provisions, promises, covenants, conditions and option provisions hereof, shall be binding upon and shall inure -to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by ther:proper.officers thereunto duly authorized, and their official seals to be hereto affixed, as of the day and year first above written. HBCH/req PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By: `/aZ(J, PCH -PTAH HER.NOT By: �C/ !�(L7ef b -r- 12 - - /37 -- SHIP Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council November 12, 1991 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO MR. UDOVICH'S LETTER REGARDING ROUND TABLE PIZZA DELIVERY Recommendation Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Background The Planning Department initially discussed Round Table Pizza's proposal to use a portion of Von's in June, 1991. Staff determined that changing the items for sale within a portion of the deli from one food item to another (salad bar and gourmet food items to pizza) did not constitute a change in use as long as no seating was allowed. Round Table Pizza agreed to remove the seating. The Planning Department subsequently authorized the proposal with no seating. Delivery service was not explicitly part of this approval. Round Table Pizza opened on August 12, and it was then brought to our attention by Mr. Udovich, that delivery service was also occurring. Given that the zoning code does not specifically mention food delivery as a permitted use, staff requested the Planning Commission for an interpretation. Staff suggested to the Commission that since delivery is not listed, that delivery of food items can only occur in conjunction with a restaurant. The Commission concurred. Therefore, the proposed change to include delivery was considered an increase in the intensity of use in terms of parking. Since the existing parking lot can not absorb this increase, Round Table Pizza was notified on September 9, 1991, to either submit a Parking Plan request (to allow less than required parking in a shopping center with shared parking) or to add parking. Staff has since been in frequent contact with officials from both Vons and Round Table Pizza regarding the need to address the parking situation. Subject to the landlords approval, Vons is planning to submit to the City Council a plan for re -striping the parking lot, which would accommodate the additional required parking . City Council approval will be necessary pursuant to the development agreement for the entire Plaza Hermosa Project. The submittal of this plan has been delayed as Vons is awaiting the landlords approval. Staff again notified Round Table Pizza on October 15, of the immediate need to take action. Vons and Round Table have not indicated any reluctance or refusal to take the appropriate actions, according to them the delay has been their inability to obtain authorization from the landlord. -/6 Analysis Mr. Udovich is suggesting that strict and immediate enforcement of the Planning Commission's interpretation be applied. Since the applicant is working towards a solution, staff has not taken immediate enforcement actions towards closing the business. However, if the delays continue a strict enforcement action may be necessary. Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager 7- ectfully Submit %/ Michael Schubach, Planning Director p/memol USE PLAZA HERMOSA PARKING SUMMARY SQUARE PARKING TOTAL FEET REQUIREMENT VONS Grocery Store 36,930 1:250 148 RoundTable Pizza 570 1:50 11 (take-out restaurant) CVS Drug Aaron Bros. Personally Yours Enchanted Elf Optometrist Fran's Hallmark Freestyle Penguin's Marie Callenders Burger King Cal Fed Wherehouse Pet Stop Cleaners Tropicana Tan Brick Oven Pizza Mail Boxes Etc. 9,985 1:250 40 7,700 1:250 30 1,725 1:250 7 1,200 1:250 5 1,200 1:250 5 2,400 1:250 10 1,200 1:250 5 1,000 1:250 4 8,900 1:100 89 2,500 1:100 25 4,000 1:250 16 6,500- 1:250 26 1,690 1:250 7 1,500 1:250 6 1,500 1:250 6 1,500 1:100 15 1,700 1:250 7 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED CURRENT PARKING TOTAL WITH RESTRIPING PLAN 462 432 463 If calculated as Consolidated Parking at one space per 250, per Section 1170, total parking required would be 375. the 4 i• Companies, Inc. Vons Stores Pavilions Stores Tianguts Stores Jersevmaid Milk Products November 19, 1991 FAX (310) 316-7826 Ms. Courtney Rank JMB Income Properties, Ltd. c/o JMB Property Management Corp. 21235 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 205 Torrance, CA 90503 RE: Vons Store No. 110 Hermosa Beach, CA Dear Courtney: 4991 This will confirm our telephone conversation of yesterday wherein you advised me that your Legal Department has approved the revised parking lot layout, provided Vons will slurry coat and stripe the entire parking lot rather than just the areas to be converted to compact stalls. Pursuant to our telephone conversation, we will provide you with a bid from our contractor and you will get a bid from your contractor, with JMB Properties overseeing the job. Our contractor will FAX us his bid for the job tomorrow, and we, in turn, will FAX the bid for your review. With the holiday season upon us, we would like the job to be done beginning the Monday after Thanksgiving, to be completed by no later than Wednesday, December 4, 1991. If you have any questions, please give me a call at (818) 821-7041. Very truly yours, THE VONS COMPANIES, INC. Shirley OBrien Property Manager Real Estate Department SO/mjo 110plt.lso cc: Ken Robertson, City of Hermosa Beach The Vons Companies. Inc. • P.O. Box 3338, Los Angeles, CA 90051 618 Michillinda Avenue, Arcadia, CA 91007-6300 • Telephone: (818) 821-7000_ -I,- TO: Hermosa Beach City Council RE: Parking spaces k)c )IAD r/ t FiLC November 11, 1991 This is a formal rebuttal to the proposed restriping and the making the existing spaces smaller. The Plaza Hermosa parking lot is already too conjested as it is, making the spaces smaller will only cause more turmoil to an already problem area. I would like to cast my vote against these changes. Maybe the city council members would like to park their cars in spaces that are far too small for a normal size car. I personally would not like to.park my car in such an environment nor would numerous other people.' I suggest that these changes be rescinded, they not benefit anyone, if fact that most assuredly be a detriment. Sincerely, • Richard Konble SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 4 a \ RF4 V1I( spring realty ` 22750 hawthome boulevard suite 101 — Z o — torrance, califomia 90505 nfi• 0131 37R-4AR4 December 1, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of December 10, 1991 PROJECT TOUCH LEASE AGREEMENT (ROOM C) RECOMMENDATION The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommend that Council approve the one year lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Project Touch for Room C in the Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached lease. BACKGROUND Project Touch presently leases Room C, 11 and 3 in the Community Center. They have been tenants in the Center since October, 1979. Project Touch is a juvenile diversion program whose services include social and educational enrichment, counseling,. meals, wilderness challenge camping and stepteen/stepfamily groups. They have served the needs of the South Bay Community's high risk youth and their families for over 15 years. ANALYSIS The lease space for Room C is 312 sq. ft. with a monthly rental of $250 ($.80 sq. ft.). The attached lease conforms to the present square footage rental policy (approved by Council on March 19, 1990) with all other conditions of the former lease remaining the same. Their residency in the Community Center has been of great value in addressing a vital social service function in Hermosa Beach. Concur: I Mary C. ney, Director Com migoity Re. oyrces Dept. Steve Wisniewski Respectfully subm Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki" Copelafid, Director Acting City Manager Finance Department - 1 - 11 HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 1st day of January 19 92 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and PROJECT TOUCH (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 7 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing on the 1st day of January ,1992 , and ending on the 31st day of December ,19 92 . 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room C (312 sq. ft.) 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent accord- ing to the following schedule: January 1, 1992 thru June 30, 1992: $.80 per sq. ft. $250 per month. July 1, 1992 thru December 31, 1992: $.84 per sq. ft. $262 per month. Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Any lawful purpose of Project Touch ,and for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in viola- tion of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises -in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di- rect or indirect act or any omission of the lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Project Touch 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Attn: Julie Dorr Feys Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1647 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: 5 December 2, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of December 10, 1991 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACH AND RECREATION ACT OF 1992 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council adopt a resolution in support of the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. BACKGROUND The Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority is proposing the inclusion of a measure for the June, 1992 County ballot that would seek to create a special benefit assessment district in LA County to fund a projected $800 million in bonds that would serve to improve county wide parks and recreation areas and facilities. These bonds would be used to provide dollars for specific regional park and open space projects (selected on a competitive basis); per capita grants (Hermosa Beach's anticipated per capita share is $252 thousand); future competitive grant programs (i.e., tree planting); county beaches and regional parks and mountain and canyon preservation (background information attached). At the September 24, 1991 meeting, Council directed staff to submit an application to the Conservation Authority for two proposed specific projects: the Municipal Pier Renovation Project (requested $2 million) and the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Acquisition (requested $5.5 million). Staff filed a completed application with the Conservation Authority on October 9, 1991. On December 1, 1991, Conservation Authority staff informed City staff that our projects had been approved by their advisory board for a total of $5.5 million ($1.5 million for the Pier and $4 million for the Greenbelt). ANALYSIS As Council may recall, the November 1990 bond measure which was almost identical to the newly proposed measure, received 57 percent of the vote. While this was not sufficient to pass a bond measure (requires 2/3 majority vote), it would be sufficient to create a benefit assessment district (requires simple majority vote) as is currently being considered. Therefore, projections are that it is likely this measure will pass. With this in mind and with the success of the City's submitted proposed specific projects, Council's support will serve to help insure their inclusion on the June, 1992 ballot measure. One of lk • 4, the Conservation Authority's listed criteria for proposed specific projects is that the project must have local political support (City Council must support by resolution). Conservation Authority staff has indicated that without a resolution, they would not include our projects on the recommended list for the Board of Supervisors. According to the Conservation Authority's preliminary estimates, if the measure passes, a parcel tax of $15 to $20 will be assessed. Using the worst case scenario ($20 per parcel), Hermosa Beach taxpayers would pay approximately $2.2 million (based on a total of 5,553 parcels) over a 20 year period if the measure is approved. It should be noted that the Conservation Authority staff indicated that it is likely this number is high considering that the assessment would be lower for commercial parcels as well as for parcels that are smaller in size than the average (of which Hermosa Beach has many). Considering that the benefit to Hermosa Beach with the passage of this measure would be approximately $5.75 million (includes the projects and the projected per capita grant) and that the debt service on the Greenbelt acquisition currently being funded by the UUT will be reduced substantially, it is evident that the approved proposed specific projects go far to insure that Hermosa Beach would get more than a fair share of the county funds. Clearly, absent the submitted proposed specific projects, should the measure pass, Hermosa Beach taxpayers will still pay the parcel tax with relatively little direct benefit. The City is progressing on the Pier Renovation project (currently the California Coastal Conservancy is working with City staff on preliminary designs and feasibility analysis) which will ultimately require substantial funding. Staff anticipates that most of this funding will have to come from regional sources. The $1.5 million from the Recreation Act would give this project a jump start and would allow the City to implement phase I of Pier renovation in a timely fashion following the design phase. The Greenbelt acquisition has a history of strong community support and has been a focal point for volunteer tree planting efforts (Hermosa Beach ReLeaf). The $L million dollars that would result from the passage of this measure would substantially reduce or eliminate the debt for parcel A and would leave only parcel B on the UUT (the Conservation Authority Advisory Board did not approve the funds for parcel B as it is still in escrow and they perceived that as being too risky). In a small municipality like Hermosa Beach, with limited resources and strong regional visitorship, it is important to get regional dollars for regional facilities whenever it is possible and deemed appropriate by Council. If adopted, this resolution will complete the City's application and will communicate the Council's support for acquiring and maintaining parks and recreation facilities locally and regionally. 2 Other alternatives available to Council include: 1. Do not adopt the resolution. 2. Amend the resolution. 3. Select a Councilmember who will work with the Conservation Authority to assist them with their campaign for the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Information on the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. 3. Sept. 24, 1991 Council item: "Mountain Recreation Conservation Authority" 4. Sept. 24, 1991 Council Action on the "Mountain Recreation Conservation Authority" item. Respectfully Submitted, Mary C Pooney, Director Comunity Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Steve Wisnie sk* Viki Copeland, Director Interim City Manager 3 Finance Department 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACH AND RECREATION ACT OF 1992. WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992 would.provide approximately $800 million to preserve, improve and restore park, beach, mountain and open space lands, senior centers and facilities, and recreation facilities to benefit current and future generations of Los Angeles county; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach finds that neighborhood and community parks, natural and recreational areas, sports facilities and playing fields are a vital and necessary part of our community and help to preserve the quality of life in the City of Hermosa Beach; and WHEREAS, local and regional park and recreation facilities are in great need of funds to improve park safety and security; and parks in good repair provide an important and healthy alternative to youth in our community through sports and other recreation opportunities; and WHEREAS, this measure would help address the great need for repair and improvements of the neighborhood and community parks of the City of Hermosa Beach; and WHEREAS, The Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority Advisory Committee has recommended approval of Hermosa Beach's two proposed specific projects: the Municipal Pier 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Renovation and the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Acquisition at a funding level of $5.5 million; and WHEREAS, The Municipal Pier and the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt are recreation facilities enjoyed by residents and regional visitors alike; and WHEREAS, senior citizens are the fastest growing age group in America today and we need to improve existing and build new park and recreation facilities for senior citizens throughout Los Angeles County; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach would receive approximately $252 thousand in per capita grants for our most pressing park and county -wide recreation needs; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach may apply for grants from approximately $50 million allocated for senior facilities, gang prevention, tree planting, trails, river restoration and historical resources throughout Los Angeles County; and WHEREAS, a county -wide and broad-based coalition of conservation, park and recreation, civic and business groups has been formed to seek the approval of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and the voters for the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach urges the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors to place the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act on the June 1992 county ballot. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, do hereby support the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 1991 PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: 14 J giae CITY ATTORNEY ,9r- ray; oVr Yx�*F'rr• RANCHO SIM RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT 3750 Solstice Canyon Road ,?-:;•;:.4-.14r-• Malibu. California 90265 R., (213) 456-7807 �T• `�t '7 . b'°Y- y , ','., 'toy. `: 4 MOUNTAINS RECREATION AND CONSERVATION AUTHORITY RANCHO RECREATION 3750 Solstice Canyon Road AND MRK Malibu. California 90265 DISTRICT (213) 456-7807 FAX (213) 456-1042 LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACHES AND RECREATION ACT OF 1992 Summary The Los Angeles County Park, Beaches and Recreation Act of 1992 will provide approximately $800 million in bonds to preserve, improve and restore park, beach and open space lands and recreation facilities throughout Los Angeles County. The measure will include badly -needed funds to improve neighborhood and regional parks, plant trees in urban areas, restore rivers, build trails, develop senior recreation facilities and protect disappearing wildlife and open space lands. The measure will also include an annual amount of approximately $20 million to operate and maintain these park and recreation facilities. Critical Need for Funds for Parks. Beaches and Recreation Our parks, beaches, recreation and open space lands are vital to maintaining our quality of life in Los Angeles County. With a population rapidly approaching nine million, we cannot meet the existing need in the county for park, beach and recreation facilities. Our parks are deteriorating; we do not have adequate recreation facilities to provide youth with alternatives to gang involvement; we are unable to meet the recreation needs of our expanding senior population; and our last remaining open space and wildlife lands are disappearing rapidly as the county continues to develop. We must act now if we hope to restore our existing parks, beaches and recreation areas, and if we want to preserve a part of our natural heritage for our children. Content of Measure The Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act will include funds for the following purposes: • Renovate and increase safety at regional and neighborhood parks • Plant trees in urban areas • Restore rivers and streams throughout the county • Restore Los Angeles County beaches and improve public access • Develop senior recreation facilities • Purchase important park, recreation, wildlife and open space lands • Expand and acquire public sports facilities • Protect threatened mountains and canyons Voter Support Los Angeles County voters continue to strongly support funding for park, recreation and open space purposes. In November of 1990, 57% of Los Angeles County voters voted YES on Proposition B, the Los Angeles County Park Bond Act. This was one of the highest votes in Los Angeles County among all measures on the November ballot. Administration The Los Angeles County Park, Beaches and Recreation Act will be funded through a special benefit assessment levied by a Los Angeles County regional park and open space district formed to administer this program. Under existing state law, a park and open space district can raise funds to acquire, improve, operate and maintain park, beach, recreation and open space lands throughout the county. Funds generated by the district will be allocated among all areas of the county, including all incorporated cities. A public entity of the State of California exercising joint powers of the Santa Monica Mountains Co the Conejo Recreation and Park District and the Rancho Sunt Recreation and Park District pursuant to Section 6500 et seq. of Government Code. ± RANCHO MOUNTAINS RECREATION AND CONSERVATION AUTHORITY SIMI 3750 Solstice Canyon Road RECREATION AND PARK Malibu. California 90265 DISTRICT (213) 456-7807 FAX (213) 456-1042 August, 1991 FACT SHEET on the LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACHES AND RECREATION ACT of 1992 What will the Los Angeles County Park, Beaches and Recreation Act do? It will improve the quality of life in Los Angeles County by providing funds to acquire, develop, restore and maintain parks, beaches, recreation and open space lands throughout the county. Why do we need this park measure? Los Angeles County's population continues to grow at an increasing rate every year. We have a tremendous and growing need for parks and recreation facilities throughout the county, and we are far behind other urban areas in the sate in providing these facilities. Safe and accessible parks, beaches, recreation and open space lands are vital to our quality of life in Los Angeles County, and we must act now if we hope to protect some of these lands for the future. How much money will the measure provide and what will the funds be spent on? The measure will provide approximately $800 million for specific park, beach, open space and recreation purposes and approximately $20 million per year for operations and maintenance. Funds will be provided for the following purposes: • Renovate and increase safety at regional and neighborhood parks • Plant trees in urban areas • Restore rivers and streams throughout the county • Renovate Los Angeles County beaches • Develop senior recreation facilities • Purchase important park, recreation, wildlife and open space lands • Expand and acquire public sports facilities • Protect threatened mountains and canyons Funds provided for operations and maintenance will be allocated between all cities and the county to pay for operations and maintenance of park and recreation facilities acquired, developed or restored with funds from the act. A public entity of the State of California exercisingJotnt powers of the Santa Monica Mountains Consenxincy the Conejo Recreation and Park District and the Rancho Simi Recreation and Pork District pursuant to Section 6500 et seq. of the Gouerrtment Code Who will be able to spend these funds? All incorporated cities within the county, the County of Los Angeles, and the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy will be able to spend these funds. How will cities benefit from this measure? Each city will receive funds based on its share of the total county population; these funds can be spent on each city's most pressing park, recreation or open space needs. The measure will include funds for specific regional park projects in cities throughout the county. Cities will also be able to apply for funds from countywide competitive programs for gang prevention, tree -planting, senior recreation, trails and river restoration. How will these funds be generated? The county will form a Regional Park and Open Space District and will use a special benefit assessment to assess property on a per parcel basis throughout the county. Is a public vote required? Yes. County voters must approve the park act, including the list of specific projects, the formation of the park district and the special benefit assessment. This vote is specifically required by state legislation. Will people in Los Angeles County vote for a Los Angeles County Park, Beaches and Recreation Act? Yes. Voters in Los Angeles County have a long record of strongly supporting funding for parks, beaches and wildlife. In November of 1990, 57% of Los Angeles County voters voted YES on Proposition B, the Los Angeles County Park Bond Act. This was one of the highest votes in Los Angeles County among all measures on the November ballot. Who will maintain lands that are bought with funds from this act? The government agencies who acquire land must agree to maintain and preserve those lands for park, recreation or open space purposes. For more information, please contact: Esther Feldman Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority 213-456-7807 4MOUNTAINS RECREATION AND CONSERVATION AUTHORITY RANCHO SUI 3750 Solstice Canyon Road RECREATION ANO PARK Malibu. California 90265 (*STRICT (213) 456-7807 J FAX (213) 456-1042 LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACH AND RECREATION ACT OF 1992 Allocation of Per Capita Grant Funds to Cities in Los Angeles County These figures are an estimate of the per capita grants each city in Los Angeles County would receive from the Los Angeles County Park Act of 1992. These figures are based on an allocation of $120 million to all cities and the unincorporated area of the county based on each city's portion of the total county population. Population figures are taken from 1990 census figures. Funds could be used for capital outlay projects to acquire, develop, improve or restore real property for parks and recreation purposes. In addition to the funds listed here, competitive funds would also be available to local agencies for tree -planting, senior recreation facilities, gang prevention, rivers restoration, trails and historical resources. City Population $ Allocation Agoura Hills 20,390 $276,000 Alhambra 82,106 $1,116,000 Arcadia 48,290 $648,000 Artesia 15,464 $204,000 Avalon 2,918 $36,000 Azusa 41,333 $564,000 Baldwin Park 69,330 $936,000 Bell 34,365 $468,000 Bell Gardens 42,355 $576,000 Bellflower 61,815 $840,000 Beverly Hills 31,971 $432,000 Bradbury 829 $20,000 Burbank 93,643 $1,272,000 Calabasas 15,697 $216,000 Carson 83,995 $1,140,000 Cerritos 53,240 $720,000 Claremont 32,503 $444,000 Commerce 12,135 $168,000 Compton 90,454 $1,224,000 Covina 43,207 $588,000 Cudahy 22,817 $312,000 Culver City 38,793 $528,000 Diamond Bar 53,672 $732,000 Downey 91,444 $1,236,000 Duarte 20,688 $276,000 El Monte 106,209 $1,440,000 El Segundo 15,223 $204,000 Gardena 49,847 $672,000 Glendale 180,038 $2,436,000 Glendora 47,828 $648,000 Hawaiian Gardens 13,639 $180,000 Hawthorne 71,349 $972,000 Hermosa Beach 18,219 $252,000 Hidden Hills 1,729 $24,000 Huntington Park 56,065 $756,000 A public entity of !legs iltfr K ege5UilartatigiltYSanta Monica Mountains Co J. the Congo Recreation and Park District and the Rancho Stmt Recreation and Park District pursuant to Section 6500 etseq. ofthe Government Code. City Population $ Allocation Industry 631 $20,000 Inglewood 109,602 $1,488,000 Irwindale 1,050 $20,000 La Canada-Flintridge 19,378 $264,000 La Habra Heights 6,226 $84,000 La Mirada 40,452 $552,000 La Puente 36,955 $504,000 La Verne 30,897 $420,000 Lakewood 73,557 $996,000 Lancaster 97,291 $1,320,000 Lawndale 27,331 $372,000 Lomita 19,382 $264,000 Long Beach 429,433 $5,820,000 Los Angeles 3,485,398 $47,184,000 Lynwood 61,945 $840,000 Malibu 11,116 $156,000 Manhattan Beach 32,063 $432,000 Maywood 27,850 $372,000 Monrovia 35,761 $480,000 Montebello 59,564 $804,000 Monterey Park 60,738 $828,000 Norwalk 94,279 $1,272,000 Palmdale 68,842 $936,000 Palos Verdes Estates 13,512 $180,000 Paramount 47,669 $648,000 Pasadena 131,591 $1,776,000 Pico Rivera 58,177 $804,000 Pomona 131,723 $1,788,000 Rancho Palos Verdes 41,659 $564,000 Redondo Beach 60,167 $816,000 Rolling Hills 1,871 $24,000 Rolling Hills Estates 7,789 $108,000 Rosemead 51,638 $696,000 San Dimas 32,397 $444,000 San Fernando 22,580 $300,000 San Gabriel 37,120 $504,000 San Marino 12,959 $180,000 Santa Clarita 110,642 $1,500,000 Santa Fe Springs 15,520 $216,000 Santa Monica 86,905 $1,176,000 Sierra Madre 10,762 $144,000 Signal Hill 8,371 $108,000 South El Monte 20,850 $288,000 South Gate 86,284 $1,164,000 South Pasadena 23,936 $324,000 Temple City 31,100 $420,000 Torrance 133,107 $1,800,000 Vernon 152 $20,000 Walnut 29,105 $396,000 West Covina 96,086 $1,296,000 West Hollywood 36,118 $492,000 Westlake Village 7,455 $96,000 Whittier 77,671 $1,056,000 Unincorporated Areas 943,907 $12,780,000 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES ONLY 4 MOUNTAINS RECREATION AND CONSERVATION AUTHORITY RANCHO 3750 Solstice Canyon Road RECREATION AM) PARK Malibu, California 90265 DISTRICT (213) 456-7807 FAX (213) 456-1042 LOS ANGFI.RS COUNTY PARK, BEACH AND RECREATION ACT OF 1992 CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIC PROJECTS In addition to the general categories of funds for parks, beaches, recreation facilities and countywide competitive programs, the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act will include funds for specific projects throughout Los Angeles County. These projects will be included in the measure with a specific funding amount for each project, allocation to a particular public agency and general designation of the area in which the funds will be spent. These projects can include acquisition, development and/or rehabilitation of park, recreation, wildlife, coastal, trail or other open space lands anywhere in Los Angeles County. Note: Every project must meet the minimum criteria listed below in order to be considered for inclusion in the measure. Please read over and then fill out the attached questionnaire. CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIC PROJECTS: 1) The project must be a sound environmental project of regional significance*, with good reasons for being preserved or improved; 2) The project must be absolutely non -controversial and all parties involved (particularly landowners, if applicable) must agree that the project should be carried out; 3) There must be willing sellers if the project is an acquisition; 4) The project must be part of a local or county general plan; 5) The project must have local political support (City Council must support by resolution); 6) The project must have strong support from local conservation and/or neighborhood groups and/or other involved organizations; 7) There must be an entity willing to operate and maintain the area once it is acquired and/or developed for park, recreation or open space use. *Regional significance must be documented through: 1) Evidence that the project is a significant natural resource; 2) Letters or studies documenting the regional use of the -proposed project by surrounding communities; - 3) Documentation that the project is or will be made available or advertised on a regional basis; 4) Evidence that the project is the only one of its kind in the surrounding region. A public entity of the State of California exercising joint powers of the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy. the Conejo Recreation and Park District and the Rancho SUM Recreation and Park District pursuant to Section 6500 et seq. of the Government Code. �........ ..- . i=w.i s 1. .4•14".1.' - - _ LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACH AND RECREATION ACT of 1992 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PROPOSED SPECIFIC PROJECTS (See Criteria for Specific Projects) Please answer the following questions in as much detail as possible and return to the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority. This information is essential to evaluate your proposed project for inclusion in the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. Please include: Project Name Your name and affiliation, or name of key contact for proposed project Address Telephone number 1. Description of the land to be acquired or proposed project if not acquisition. Include breakdown of proposed development, restoration or improvement projects. 2. Exact location (please enclose a map indicating location). 3. How many acres (approximately)? 4. What amount of funds is needed to acquire the property or carry out this project? 5. How was this amount determined? Has the property been appraised? 6. Which governmental agency/agencies would acquire the property or receive funds to carry out the proposed project? 7. Does the project have regional significance (see previous page)? Is it or will it be used by many communities? Please include information on regional nature of project. 8. Who would operate and manage the property after acquisition? Have they agreed to do so? 9. Who are the current property owners? Are the current owners willing to sell? 10. Would the current property owners oppose the proposed project being included in the district? 11. Does the Board of Supervisors support the project and the designation of agencies for acquisition and management? 12. Does the City Council(s) support the project and the designation of agencies for acquisition and management? 13. Which local or state organizations SUPPORT the project? (Please list groups) 14. Which local or state organizations OPPOSE the project? Who might oppose the project? 15. Has there been any publicity about the above area or project? Has it been positive or negative? Please send to: Attn: Joscelyn Herzberg, MRCA, 3750 Solstice Canyon Road, Malibu, CA 90265. INFORMATION DUE DATES All proposed projects will be reviewed by the countywide Advisory Committee for the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. October 15, 1991 November 15, 1991 December 15, 1991 Submit all proposed project information with completed questionnaire Submit letters of support for proposed project Submit City Council resolution in support of proposed project For additional information, please contact Esther Feldman or Joscelyn Herzberg at (213)456-7807. RANCHO RECREATION3750 Solstice Canyon Road ANO PARK Malibu, California 90265 ' I DISTRICT (213) 456-7807 MOUNTAINS RECREATION AND CONSERVATION AUTHORITY �._ FAX (213) 456-1042 OUTLINE OF ENABLING LEGISLATION FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACH AND RECREATION ACT OF 1992 Senate Bill 659 (Hill) The Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992 would be funded through a special benefit assessment levied by a Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District. Under existing state law, a regional park and open space district can be established to address Los Angeles County's growing park, recreation and open space needs. A regional park district may levy a special benefit assessment to raise funds for park, recreation and open space purposes. State legislation (Senate Bill 659 - Hill) addresses the specific needs of Los Angeles County in forming such a district. SB 659 (Hill) includes the following requirements for formation of the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District: • Voter approval of the formation of the district, the special benefit assessment and the specific spending plan for the district; • A spending plan that includes a list of specific park, beach, recreation and open space projects; • Expenditure of a minimum of 80% of all funds generated by the district on capital outlay projects; • Use of all operations and maintenance funds to operate and maintain park, beach, recreation and open space projects funded according to the approved spending plan; • Allocation of all funds generated by the district among the county, all cities in the county and the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy; • Definition of district boundaries; • Prohibition against changes with respect to district boundaries, specific projects or rate of assessments once approved by voters; • Designation of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors as the Board of Directors of the park district; • Voter approval of any future assessment or spending plan. August 1991 A public entity of the State of California ererclsinglotnt powers of the Santa Monica Mountains Co the Conejo Recreation and Park District and the Rancho Slml Recreation and Park District pursuant to Section 6500 et seq. of Government Code. October 30, 1991 3750 Solstice CarWon Road R 4 MOUNTAINS RECREATION AND CONSERVATION AUTHORITY III RANCHO° ECREATION 1 r AorsTr Malibu. California 90265 I 'LT (213) 456-7807 -J • FAX (213) 456-5332 TO: Cities interested in the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992 RE: Important information. • Dear Friends: • " • , At the request of miny cities, representatives from the League of California Cities LA County Division, the Contract Cities Association and the Independent Cities Association have been added to the citizen's Advisory Committee guiding the development of the county park measure. The Advisory . -1 Committee will hold its first meeting on November 20 from 1:30-4:30 p.m., at the Public Counsel . i offices, 3535 West 6th St. Suite 100. The committee Will review all p`roposed specific projects at this - --I meeting. „... - ., .. , 7"" . ,' ' 4.''' '-,--, ; " 7.f.:‘,..iAt, 11.:" ' ": - ', •,- t -ii:::.,,,-, -•;?;— . , : 1.. .1' : i ... • .. . ,C .‘ . ,,, • .l.. .. ' '' '. ,..... 'Z.:. ' We are enclosing a list comparing the per capita funds your city would receive from the proposed 1 1 county measure with per capita funds available to you from the last state park bond act. Please note that . the county measure would provide significantly more funds for your city's most pressing park and recreation needs, as the county measure is designed to specifically address our needs in Los Angeles County. The use of per capita funds is discretionary and will be determined by each city council. 4 i 4 • e We are enclosing a draft of a city council resolution in support of placing the park measure on the June 1992 ballot for you to use if you wish. Your city's support is essential to ensure that the Board of Supervisors will place this measure on the ballot. We expect the Board of Supervisors to take its first action in January; we therefore need to receive your city council's resolution no later than the first week of January. . • -4- , ,.. „,, , ..... ., .-: - . . • ..,. •-i For those cities which have submitted specific project proposals: Thank you for the information you have sent us on your particular project. If you have os sent us all the necessary information, please do so immediately. It is essential that we have all the components for your proposed specific project so that we can review and prepare all projects for the Advisory ' Committee's review. Please note: November 15 is the deadline for submitting letters of support for your project from surrounding cities and -organizations. Thank you very much for all of your help thus far in developing this county park measure that will address park and recreation needs throughout Los Angeles County. We appreciate all of your efforts and look forward to continuing to work with you in the corning months. Please do not hesitate to call us at (213)456-7807 if you have any questions or if we can be of any assistance. Tr - Sincerely, ” " ' • • " •=1.: IT': • 1 • • ••• Esther Feldman Director, Special Programs • ,JosC'elyn Herzberg .... • Research Director s A public entity of the State of CalTomia exercisingjoint powers of the Santa Monica Mountains Cnservaricy. theConejo Recreation and Park pistrict ftrzci the Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District pursuant to Section o500 et seq. of the Government Code • .4, „„,• • t'....14`. - - . ' 7 , tI4cik,44-k-44Y3s,,,Ciatd;144 City Population Inglewood 109,602 Irwindale 1,050 La Canada-Flintridge 19,378 La Habra Heights 6,226 La Mirada 40,452 La Puente 36,955 La Verne 30,897 Lakewood 73,557 Lancaster 97,291 Lawndale 27,331 Lomita 19,382 Long Beach 429,433 Los Angeles 3,485,398 Lynwood 61,945 Malibu 11,116 Manhattan Beach 32,063 Maywood 27,850 Monrovia 35,761 Montebello 59,564 Monterey Park 60,738 Norwalk 94,279 Palmdale 68,842 Palos Verdes Estates 13,512 Paramount 47,669 Pasadena 131,591 Pico Rivera 58,177 Pomona 131,723 Rancho Palos Verdes 41,659 Redondo Beach 60,167 Rolling Hills 1,871 Rolling Hills Estates 7,789 Rosemead 51,638 San Dimas 32,397 San Fernando 22,580 San Gabriel 37,120 San Marino 12,959 Santa Clarita 110,642 Santa Fe Springs 15,520 Santa Monica 86,905 Sierra Madre 10,762 Signal Hill 8,371 South El Monte 20,850 South Gate 86,284 South Pasadena 23,936 Temple City 31,100 Torrance 133,107 Vernon 152 Walnut 29,105 West Covina 96,086 West Hollywood 36,118 Westlake Village 7,455 Whittier 77,671 1988 State Park Bond Act $309,000 $ 20,000 $ 63,000 $ 20,000 $129,000 $101,000 $ 91,000 $232,000 $225,000 $ 82,000 $ 61,000 $1,255,000 $10,137,000 $162,000 n/a $106,000 $ 74,000 $102,000 $172,000 $193,000 $272,000 $118,000 $ 46,000 $129,000 $398,000 $169,000 $359,000 $140,000 $196,000 $ 20,000 $ 24,000 $143,000 $ 96,000 $ 61,000 $104,000 $ 42,000 $444,000 $ 47,000 $293,000 $ 34,000 $ 24,000 $ 56,000 $239,000 $ 73,000 $ 97,000 $427,000 $ 20,000 $ 75,000 $284,000 $116,000 $ 23,000 $222,000 Proposed 1992 Allocation* 81,488,000 $20,000 $264,000 $84,000 $552,000 $504,000 $420,000 $996,000 $1,320,000 $372,000 $264,000 $5,820,000 $47,184,000 $840,000 $156,000 $432,000 $372,000 $480,000 $804,000 $828,000 $1,272,000 $936,000 $180,000 $648,000 $1,776,000 $804,000 $1,788,000 $564,000 $816,000 $24,000 $108,000 $696,000 $444,000 $300,000 $504,000 $180,000 $1,500,000 $216,000 $1,176,000 $144,000 $108,000 $288,000 $1,164,000 $324,000 $420,000 $1,800,000 $20,000 $396,000 $1,296,000 $492,000 $96,000 $1,056,000 *PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES ONLY October 30, 1991 MOUNTAINS RECREATION AND CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 3750 Solstice Can Road Malibu, California 90265 (213) 456-7807 FAX (213) 456-5332 LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARK, BEACH, AND RECREATION ACT OF 1992 Allocation of Per Capita Grant Funds to Cities in Los Angeles County The following figures compare the approximate amount of per capita funds each city would receive from the proposed Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act with the per capita funds each city received from the last state park bond act in 1988. Please note that the dollar amounts for the 1992 county park measure are preliminary estimates only. Per capita funds are allocated based on each city's percentage of the total population in the county. Each city would receive these funds as a direct grant. Per capita funds could be used for each city's most pressing park and recreation needs; use of these funds would be determined by each city council. City Population 1988 State Park Bond Act Proposed 1992 Allocations Agoura Hills 20,390 $ 58,000 $276,000 Alhambra 2,106 $222,000 $1,116,000 Arcadia 48,290 $149,000 $648,000 Artesia 15,464 $ 45,000 $204,000 Avalon 2,918 $ 20,000 $36,000 Azusa 41,333 $113,000 $564,000 Baldwin Park 69,330 $190,000 $936,000 Bell 34,365 $ 84,000 $468,000 Bell Gardens 42,355 $116,000 $576,000 Bellflower 61,815 $181,000 $840,000 Beverly Hills 31,971 $105,000 $432,000 Bradbury 829 $ 20,000 $20,000 Burbank 93,643 $282,000 $1,272,000 Calabasas 15,697 n/a $216,000 Carson 83,995 $267,000 $1,140,000 Cerritos 53,240 $176,000 $720,000 Claremont 32,503 $110,000 $444,000 Commerce 12,135 $ 34,000 $168,000 Compton 90,454 $281,000 $1,224,000 Covina 43,207 $130,000 $588,000 Cudahy 22,817 $ 62,000 $312,000 Culver City 38,793 $124,000 $528,000 Diamond Bar 53,672 n/a $732,000 Downey 91,444 $262,000 $1,236,000 Duarte 20,688 $ 64,000 $276,000 El Monte 106,209 $283,000 $1,440,000 El Segundo 15,223 $ 48,000 $204,000 Gardena 49,847 $153,000 $672,000 Glendale 180,038 $488,000 $2,436,000 Glendora 47,828 $145,000 $648,000 Hawaiian Gardens 13,639 $ 37,000 $180,000 Hawthorne 71,349 $202,000 $972,000 Hermosa Beach 18,219 $ 60,000 $252,000 Hidden Hills 1,729 $ 20,000 $24,000 Huntington Park 56,065 $153,000 $756,000 Industry 631 $ 20,000 $20,000 *PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES ONLY A public entity of the State of California exercising joint pourers of the Santa .Konica Mountains Conserranct. the Conejo Recreation and Park Distnct rind the Rancho Simi Recreation and Park Distract pursuant to Section 6500 et sea. of the Government C.:de. .• October 17, 1991 4 MOUNTAINS RECREATION AND CONSERVATION AUTHORITY R.0.3 SIMI 3750 Solstice Canyon Road RECREATION Ammo( Malibu. California 90265 otsmicr (213) 456-7807 FAX (213) 456-5332 To: Those interested in the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992 Re: Update • A g I • • . • : . ,::: .i.,::: _ . ., ::.-,. --f?, . ,. 4 1 .4.;.... , , . . - . . "•- :. .- - ' .,',. r....• ,,- .. , GOVERNOR SIGNS LEGISLATION: • ... - • -,...,-;-, - .. We are pleased to tell you that Governor Wilson signed SB 659 (Hill) into law this month. SB 659 allows the County of Los Angeles to place a measure on the ballot that will fund acquisktion,.restoratiorl and improvement of park, beach, recreation and open space lands throughout the county. „This measure is proposed for the June 1992 ballot and will include a specific spending plan modeled after. the strongly- supported Proposition B in November 1990. The measure will form a countywide regional park district to administer the program and will levy an assessment to secure the issuance of bonds to fund the park spending plan. SB 659 was modeled after similar legislation for Riverside, San Bernardino, Sonoma and • Marin counties. . -- ' , .2 , .., .. • . --r . ' r • t.r •.: - • , - , _. __:,--,_. '',•.04,,,.,„. ..,, • -; '-i --• -. - .. ,- ;• - :, . . .14 7' . .. ,.,.. •• . L .2 . rz ' .. _ ' + • % ,. ,, 14., . A IA k'• • • ,... • • '. • . . 4• .Z . • ..... . ''44.)-''''' 1.,-*. N"' FUNDING BREAKDOWN: - To ensure the same strong voter support for the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992, the spending plan will be modeled after the funding allocation developed for Prop."13. The following is a preliminary estimate of the proposed funding breakdown: - ' • $400-450 million for specific regional park, gang prevention, beach, recreation and open space projects • $120 million for per capita grants to cities and the county for capital outlay projects • $50-75 million for countywide competitive grants for tree -planting, gang prevention, trails, river and stream restoration, senior recreation facilities and historical resources • $20 million for county regional parks .; . • $50 million for- county beaches • S75 million for mountain and canyon preservation In addition, approximately $20 million will be available annually to cities and the county for operations and maintenance of projects funded by this measure. . .. -, • : • .. - r- -,, . r -, • - - COMPETITIVE PROGRAMS - : ., . - -,..-.• • - : -• :- , ii -z • -'... . , The park measure will include countywide competitive funds similar to competitive programs included in past state park bond acts. Public agencies and nonprofit organizations will be able to compete for these funds, which will be available over a period of years. After holding public hearings, the county Department of Parks and Recreation (in conjunction with other agencies where applicable) will establish criteria and a timeline for each program. The county will, receive a per capita share of each program so that cities will not be competing with the county for funds. In addition to the programs included in Prop. 1 B, a senior recreation facility program has been proposed in order to help address the unmet recreation needs of our fast-growing senior population. SPECIFIC PROJECTS: Nearly half of the proposed measure will consist of specific park, beach, recreation or open space projects, which will be included with an allocation to a specified public agency. All proposed specific projects must be regionally significant and must meet the established criteria. Nearly all specific projects proposed by cities have been submitted, and we are reviewing them for presentation to the Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee (see below) will review all proposed projects at the November meeting. Please contact our office if you have any questions about including specific projects in the measure or if you want additional information. CITIES: We have now met with over seventy cities in the county, as well as with many representatives of business, civic, senior, park and conservation organizations throughout the county. We are pleased to inform you that the proposed 1992 park measure has received tremendous support from all parts of the county and from many different groups. The Independent Cities Organization recently passed a resolution endorsing the measure. Over 450 cities, organizations and individuals endorsed Prop. B, and based on our initial meetings, we will far exceed that number next year. • ADVISORY COMMITTEE: The citizen's Advisory Committee is composed of representatives from throughout the county and from the park, recreation, civic, business and senior communities. This committee will guide the development of the measure and will form the base to support passage of the measure once it is on the ballot. We are also working to gain the support of leaders in the sports community in Los Angeles, as a large part of this measure is devoted to improving and expanding sports opportunities for youth throughout the county. The Advisory Committee will meet in November at a date to -be -announced to review all proposed projects and the general makeup of the measure, and to discuss building broad-based support for the measure both before the Board of Supervisors and on the ballot. • COST OF MEASURE: We are working with assessment engineers, legal counsel and the Department of Public Works to develop the most feasible assessment methods. We expect to have a proposed assessment spread very soon. Please do not hesitate to call us at 213-456-7807 if/0u have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Esther Feldman Joscelyn Herzberg Director, Special Programs Research Director 2 (1mi/ p September 17;• 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of September 24, 1991 MOUNTAIN RECREATION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council direct staff to submit an application for proposed specific projects (Municipal Pier Renovation and Greenbelt Acquisition) to the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority to be considered for inclusion in the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. BACKGROUND As Council will recall, in November, 1990 the LA County Ballot included Proposition B, a bond measure sponsored by the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority. Two specific projects were included in the bond measure for Hermosa Beach; the Municipal Pier Renovation and Greenbelt Acquisition. If the measure had passed (it received 57% of the vote which did not meet the 2/3 majority requirement), the City would have received $7.5 million for these projects ($1.5 million for the Pier and $6 million for the Greenbelt). The Conservation Authority recently contacted the City to discuss their newly proposed ballot measure called the Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992, which would seek to create a special benefit assessment district in LA Countyto fund a projected $800 million in bonds that would serve to improve County wide parks and recreation areas (see attached information booklet). The supporters of this measure hope the Supervisors will place it on the June, 1992 Ballot. As was the case with Proposition B, if the Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992 passes (which would require a simple majority vote), the City would receive a one time per capita grant of approximately $252,000 and as with proposition B, those cities with approved proposed specific projects would receive additional funds. ANALYSIS The same logic applied in submitting an application for proposed specific projects for Proposition B exists with the Park, Beach and Recreation Act. With Council's approval, a successful application for funds will assure that if the measure passes, Hermosa Beach will receive direct benefits (if Proposition B had passed, Hermosa Beach would have received the highest per capita return of any municipality in the County). Our projects carry significant criteria strength as they are of high regional significance; they are non -controversial; they contain Council and community support; and they supply recreation areas of significant value. Both projects have seen progress since our last application with the approval of funds for designing the Pier renovation (from the Coastal Conservancy) and the recent Council approved Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Forestation :Project. This should add credibility to the application and a testimony to the local commitment to the areas. It is important for a small municipality like Hermosa Beach, with a modest funding base to attempt wherever possible to obtain ( ° funds from regional sources to support regional facilities. Our beach visitorship alone numbers over three (3) million annually which fits well with the Conservation Authority's ideal for providing projects with more than local significance. The approved proposed specific projects for Proposition B included $6 million for the Greenbelt Acquisition and $1.5 million for the Pier. As the numbers have changed for both projects, staff recommends the following request be authorized for the Park, Beach and Recreation Act: 1) Hermosa Beach Pier Renovation Project: Request $2 million for the rehabilitation of the Pier to include examination and repairs as well' as aesthetic and access improvements as conceptually approved by Council. 2) Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Acquisition: To request funding for the purchase of the railroad right-of-way (currently being funded by the UUT) at an approximate cost of $5.5 million ($4 million for Parcel A and $1.5 million for Parcel B). As the deadline for proposed specific projects is October 15, 1991, Council's immediate approval is requested. Specific information about this measure is still forthcoming and staff will return with a more thorough examination of the Recreation Act prior to December, 1991 so that Council may consider whether or not to draft a resolution in support of this measure. Other alternatives available to Council include: 1. Direct staff not to submit applications for proposed specific projects. 2. Direct staff to modify the recommended projects and/or funding amounts requested. 3. Select additional/different projects for inclusion in the measure. 4. Request more information. Concur: :i evin B. Northcr Respectfully submitted, ooney, Director y Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Director City Manager Finance Department (h) (i) (7) (k) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to confirm the Planning Commission interpretation and Policy State- ment regarding applicable setbacks on "half lots" on alley/street corners. Recommendation to receive and file report on Public Works Director recruitment. Memorandum from City Man- ager Kevin B. Northcraft and Interim City Manager Desig- nee Steve Wisniewski dated September 17, 1991. Action: To receive and file the staff recommendation to continue with the recruitment of a rlew Public Works Di- rector prior to the appointment of a new City Manager. Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment for one General Services Of- ficer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated September 6, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation for a 30 day extension of the temporary appointment for one General Services Officer. Recommendation to submit an application for proposed specific projects to the Mountain Recreation and Conser- vation Authority for inclusion in the Los Angeles Coun- ty Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated Sep- tember 17, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct staff to submit an application to the Mountain Recre- ation and Conservation Authority requesting the Municipal Pier repair and renovation ($2 million) and the Greenbelt acquisition ($5.5 million) be considered for inclusion in the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. Councilmember Wiemans registered a "no" vote on this item. Recommendation to approve increase of funds for ad- ministration and inspection services for the slurry sealing project (CIP 90-170). Memorandum from Acting Public Works Director William Glickman dated September 16, 1991. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Acting Public Works Director Glickman responded to Coun- cil questions to explain that the additional costs were due to the extended time needed to comply with change orders issued by the City. City Council Minutes 09-24-91 Page 7567 4 MOUNTAINS RECREATION AND CONSERVATION AUTHORITY fir 44 's','+0 ' 3750 Solstice Canyon Road StCPEAraCNI . AN,wilR Malibu. California 90265 DL4TP.:' 1 (213) 436.7$07 . —1 FAX (213) 456-5332 December 5, 1991 Ms. Mary Rooney Director, Community Services 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Ms. Rooney: Thank you very much for the City of Hermosa Beach's specific project proposals for the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. We are enclosing a draft resolution in support of the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act for your city council and endorsement forms for organizations in your city. It is very important for your city council and local organizations to endorse the measure to encourage the Board of Supervisors to place the measure on the June ballot. The Board will take its first formal action on the measure in mid-January, when a public hearing will be scheduled. PLEASE NOTE: We need to receive your city's resolution in support of the park measure and all other endorsements by January 10, 1992. Please send a copy of your city's resolution to your Supervisor. Letters from supportive local organizations to your Supervisor would also be very helpful. The Advisory Committee has approved including one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) for the Hermosa Beach Pier project and four million dollars ($4,000,000) for the Hermosa Greenbelt project. We need your help to build support in your community to show the Board of Supervisors that there is local support for these projects. PIease submit letters of support from business, civic, park and other organizations that support these projects and would help build support for the measure. The City of Hermosa Beach will also receive approximately $252,000 in per capita discretionary funds for your most pressing Iocal park and recreation needs. The list of all proposed projects will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for their review and final approval. It is my important that your Supervisor knows that the City of Hermosa Beach strongly.supports the inclusion of your projects in the proposed park measure. We received many more specific project proposals and funding requests this year from cities than we did for Prop. B. Regional significance, visitor use and regional balance were carefully considered for each proposed project. Please let us know if you or your council have any questions regarding the proposed measure before this issue comes before your council for a vote. It is very important to resolve any controversial issues beforehand if possible. We are happy to assist in any way that we can. SUPPLEMENTA&,`- INFORMATION lk A public entity of the State of California exercistnajoint powersof the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy. the Conejo Recreation and Park District and the Rancho Sim( Recreation and Park District pursuant to Section 6500 et seq. of the Government Code. Again, we need to receive letters of support for your projects from Iocal business, civic, park and other organizations as soon as possible. We very much appreciate the hard work you have put into your proposals. We are dependent on you to help build support in your area. Your city's support and endorsements from your local park, recreation, civic and business groups are vital to the success of this measure. We cannot succeed without your help! Please feel free to call us at (213)456-7807 if you have any questions or if we can be of any additional assistance. Sincerely, Esther Feldman Director, Special Programs cc: Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager V Joscelyn Herzberg Research Director Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 3, 1991 Regular Meeting of December 10, 1991 SUBJECT: AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PURPOSE: AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LOS ANGLES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONS COORDINA'1'EU PARATRANSIT NETWORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH PARTICIPATION WITH MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution. Background: On September 6, 1991 the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) issued a final rule implementing the transportation -related provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). As a result each fixed route transit operator is required to provide complementary paratransit service to disabled individuals and to prepare a plan to begin service implementation by January 26, 1992. For further background information see the attached letter dated November 11, 1991. Analysis: Participation in the Los Angles County coordinated paratransit plan is the most appropriate and effective means of meeting the ADA obligations, and the LACTC has agreed to prepare the plan. As the lead agency of MAX service, the City of Torrance will be the responsible agency and will be adopting a resolution. It is staffs recommendation that the City of Hermosa Beach also adopt this resolution as a mechanism to retain local control, protect against further regional requirements, and guarantee compliance with federal regulations. The City of Redondo Beach is adopting a similar resolution for the same reason. COLIC Michael chubach Planning Director Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution. 2 LACTC letter dated 11/11/91 3.. Attachment A Lindsay L. Hirsh Planning Aide g.1) 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE PARATRANSIT SERVICE AS MANDATED BY THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California held a meeting on this matter and made the following findings: A. The Americans with Disabilities Act (hereinafter referred to as ADA) was enacted on July 26, 1990 (Public Law 101-336); and B . On September 6, 1991 the United States Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as "DOT") issued a final rule implementing the transportation -related provisions of the ADA (49 CFR Parts 27, 37 and 38, Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities); and C. Subpart F, Sections 37.121 and 37.135 of 49 CFR 37 requires that each fixed route transit operator provide complementary paratransit service to disabled individuals, prepare a plan for implementation of such service and begin service implementation by January 26, 1992; and D. Subpart F, Sections 37.141 of 49 CFR 37 allows the preparation and submittal of a single coordinated paratransit plan among the operators of fixed route transit service with _ overlapping and contiguous service areas; and E. The City of Hermosa Beach (hereinafter referred to as "City") operates a fixed route transit system in Los Angles County and is required to begin implementation of ADA -eligible complementary paratransit service and submit a paratransit plan to DOT by January 26, 1992 and annually thereafter; and F . The Los Angles County Transportation Commission (hereinafter referred to as "LACTC"), which is mandated by state statutes to coordinate paratransit services in Los Angles County, has determined that the development of a countywide coordinated paratransit network (hereinafter known as the "Network") is the most appropriate and effective means of meeting the ADA obligations of the Los Angles County fixed route transit operators; and G . The LACTC has agreed to prepare the comprehensive DOT -required annual coordinated paratransit plan (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan") for all participating Los Angeles County fixed route transit providers who pass resolutions supporting the Plan; and H. The LACTC has agreed to prepare and submit an interim plan including such support resolutions to DOT by January 26, 1992 and prepare and submit the complete countywide coordinated paratransit plan to DOT by July 26, 1992;.and I. The LACTC has agreed to coordinate the implementation of complementary paratransit services through the development of a countywide paratransit network and begin implementation of a coordinated paratransit network to provide the mandated transportation services; and J . The LACTC will provide funding for the cost of the mandated services above the costs expended by the City for elderly and disabled transit services. K . The City desires to meet its ADA -mandated paratransit obligations through participation in the coordinated paratransit plan and service being developed by the LACTC. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT the City is committed to provide ADA paratransit services and agrees to participate in the development of the Los Angles County coordinated paratransit plan to provide such service in conformance with the requirements of 49 CFR Part 37 Subpart F. The City will make the following efforts toward participation in the Plan: 1. Provide relevant fiscal and operating data (as described in Attachment A) about its current fixed route and paratransit services to the LACTC in a timely manner for inclusion in the required annual ADA paratransit plan; and 2. Participate in the development of the Los Angeles County consolidated ADA paratransit plan due to DOT on July 26, 1992; and 3 . Present such plan for City Council adoption prior to June 15, 1992; and 4. Either adopt the consolidated paratransit plan or prepare and submit and individual city paratransit plan prior to July 26, 1992. 5 . In accordance with 49 C1 -R Part 37.141, the City will maintain current levels of paratransit service until the coordinated plan goes into effect.. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 1992 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: (1 jt"oae CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY November 11, 1991 Mr. Kevin Northcraft City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. Northcraft: RECEIVED NOV 1 3 1991 CITY MGR. OFFICE As the sponsor/operator of the Municipal Area Express, your city is required, under the Americans With Disabilities Act, (ADA), passed by Congress in July 1990, to provide paratransit service to those severely disabled individuals who are unable to access an accessible fixed route bus. In addition, the ADA requires each fixed route operator to prepare and submit to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) by January 26, 1992 a plan to implement this paratransit service. The plan must include a process for evaluating and certifying disabled individuals eligible for the service. In order to efficiently meet the extensive complementary paratransit service and plan obligations of the thirty-seven fixed route transit systems in Los Angeles County, the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, (LACTC), has initiated the development of a countywide, coordinated paratransit plan. The legislation enacting the ADA specifically allows agencies like the LACTC to coordinate service, and to prepare and submit one coordinated countywide plan. The proposed Paratransit Plan will provide the mandated complementary paratransit service by continuing the operations of existing local paratransit operators and purchasing additional services from public or private paratransit operators who wish to participate in the Plan. At its meeting on June 26, 1991, the Commission earmarked funding to fund additional service required under the ADA. The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission requests your city's participation in the development of the Paratransit Plan. By participating in the Plan, your city's obligation to provide the complementary paratransit service and to prepare and submit a plan to the DOT will be assumed by the LACTC. In addition, as service is implemented, your disabled residents will gain access to cross -jurisdictional transportation at no cost to the city. If your city does not adopt the attached resolution, it is required to prepare a complete paratransit plan and submit it to DOT by January 26, 1992. To participate in the Los Angeles County coordinated Paratransit Plan, your city must pass a resolution by January 15, 1992 certifying its intention to participate in the coordinated plan. A draft resolution is enclosed and we encourage your immediate ifItgRail ,�" Construction Corporation �a Subsidiary of the Los Angeles County twat Transportation Commission 818 West Seventh Street Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel 213 623-1194 Leading the Way to Greater Mobility Page 2 scheduling of this item for your council's consideration. Although the resolution may be modified to meet your city's specific needs, the responsibilities of the city and the LACTC, as detailed in the resolution, are regulated by federal statute and may not be changed. - As the coordinating agency for the Paratransit Plan, the LACTC has agreed to assume the following responsibilities: o Prepare and submit an interim coordinated paratransit plan to DOT by January 26, 1992, and a countywide coordinated plan by July 26, 1992 and annually thereafter beginning January 26, 1993; o Develop and administer an ADA -eligible certification and registration process; o Hold public hearings as required by the ADA; o Develop and staff a committee comprised of disabled individuals or agencies representing the disabled as required by the ADA; o Begin implementation of coordinated Paratransit Plan; o Provide funding for the cost of the ADA -mandated service above that currently expended for elderly and disabled transportation. By passing this resolution, the city is authorizing the LACTC to assume its obligations to provide the complementary paratransit service and submit the plan as required by the ADA. A summary of the transportation regulations is available upon request as are copies of all applicable ADA regulations. Also enclosed is a summary of the paratransit plan demonstration project in the East San Gabriel Valley. Commission staff is available to discuss the coordinated plan with you and your staff, or address your city council if you so desire. Please do not hesitate to contact Deidre Heitman, CTSA Program Manager, at (213) 244-6744 for more information. Other CTSA staff members are also available to discuss this with you. Sincerely, ROBERT D. CASHIN, Director South Bay c: City Transit Administrator Enclosure Attachment A COORDINATED PARATRANSIT PLAN DATA REQUIREMENTS FIXED ROUTE: o Days and hours of service by route (timetables) o Fares, including passes and discounts o Total number of buses o Anticipated bus replacements and acquisitions o Number and distribution of accessible buses o Dimensions of lift platforms by bus model o Daily system ridership o Estimated daily disabled ridership o Number of missed runs o Number of pass -ups o Total operations budget o Number and percent of accessible routes 6 PARATRANSIT: Days and hours of service Fares, including passes and discounts Total number of buses Anticipated bus replacements and acquisitions Number of accessible buses Dimensions of lift platforms by bus model Daily system ridership Daily estimated disabled ridership Number of missed trips Number of refused trips Total operations budget Trip purpose restrictions December 3, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 10, 1991 REPORT ON THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT STATUS Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Receive and file this report. 2. Review the two attached documents that are listed below and provide any comments or revisions to the City staff. These comments or revisions will then be relayed back to the County Public Works staff, prior to finalization of the following documents: a. Proposed Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement b. Draft of the Workplan for the Stormwater/Urban Runoff Monitoring Program Background: The City of Hermosa Beach is a Co -Permittee in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to cleanup Santa Monica Bay. The Permit was issued on June 18, 1990, by the State Regional Water Resources_ Control Board to 1$ c4ities_.within the Santa Monica Bay Drainage Basin plus the County of Los Angeles. Under the.Permit, the County functions as the principal Permittee with the cities identified as Co -Permittees. As principal Permittee, the County has two major obligations: (1) to carry out permit responsibilities for unincorporated areas and County -owned drainage facilities, and (2) to act as Permit Coordinator among the various Co -Permittees, including the consolidation and preparation of Permit -mandated reports for Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) review. - 1 - Analysis: A stormwater management program for a storm drain system as extensive as the one in Los Angeles County has never before been developed and implemented. The work on the permit tasks is important and sufficient time needs to be devoted to the planning and design of the program required by the Permit. This effort will help ensure that the concerns of the County residents will result in realistic improvements to the water quality of the Santa Monica Bay Drainage Basin. The Stormwater Permit listed 10 tasks which were to be completed by each Co -Permittee by the end of the first year. The tasks involved the compiling of existing data, practices, and procedures. Researching and identifying this information required data and activities from a broad range of functions; including land development; building activities; road maintenance; storm drain operation and maintenance; sewer maintenance; plus design and construction activities. The cities are currently awaiting formal response from the RWQCB on the First Year Status Report that was prepared by the County. The task activities that need to be completed in this year include development of an Early Action Best Management Practices (BMP) plan, a workplan for a stormwater/urban runoff monitoring program, and an agreement between the County and the Co -Permittees to document cooperative responsibilities under the permit. These tasks require extensive research, analysis and effort to create an effective water quality management program. A proposed time schedule for completion of these remaining tasks was included in the first year report to the RWQCB. Once the Early Action BMP plan and the workplan for a stormwater/urban runoff monitoring program have been developed, they must be submitted to the RWQCB for approval. Therefore, the additional staff and resources needed to implement these plans cannot be estimated until the approval process has been completed by the RWQCB. Also, no cost estimate can be made at this time for implementing future year requirements. These plans'that are developed in compliance with the permit will have both far-reaching and long-term impacts on the residents of Los ":. Angeles County. Each phase of the permit involves an extensive effort to characterize the drainage needs being addressed. These needs include a_complicated array of interacting land uses, possible pollution sources, soil types, drainage patterns, identifying types of procedures and new technologies. Also, new policies and procedures need to be developed which are appropriate and effective for the monitoring, control, and improvement of the storm drain flows. The first year under the permit was a learning experience for both the present Co -Permittees and the County. The lessons learned will make the future years under the permit a much more effective process. In the future, the number of Co -Permittees is expected to increase to a total of over 80 cities. The City staff will continue to work towards a responsible and well-planned implementation of our permit activities in a responsible, timely manner. Respectfully submitted. Lynn A. Terry Deputy City Engineer pworks/ccnpdes Concur: lliam G i:kman, Interim irector of Public Works Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager STORMWATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT NO. CA0066654-CI6948 PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT This agreement, entered into this day of , 19_, by and between the County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Flood Control District (both herein jointly referred to as the Principal Permittee), and the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Cities of Agoura Hills, Beverly Hills, Culver City, El Segundo, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Westlake Village, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, Santa Monica, Torrance, West Hollywood (herein after collectively referred to as the Co -Permittees). This agreement establishes the responsibilities of each party hereto with respect to compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CA0061654-C16948 (herein called the Permit) issued for the Principal Permittee and Co -Permittees by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (CRWQCB). The parties hereto agree as follows: A. STRUCTURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. All Permittees (Principal and Co -Permittees) are independently responsible for complying with the requirements of the Permit (Attachment A) within their own jurisdictional boundaries. For storm drains owned and operated by Los Angeles County, including those located within the jurisdiction of the Co -Permittees, the Principal Permittee will be responsible for facility operation and maintenance. 2. The Principal Permittee shall be responsible for the following: a) Coordination of Permit activities, including establishing a uniform mapping and data presentation format, to be used by all Permittees. b) Serving as the liaison agency between the CorP.e rmittees_--and the CRWQCB. The effort shall include: i) Establishment of time schedules for the performance of tasks and activities per the requirements of the Permit. —ii) Preparation of the quarterly progress reports on Permit activities for submittal to the CRWQCB. iii) Upon receiving information and materials submitted by the Co -Permittees in compliance with Permit requirements, packaging and forwarding of these submittals, on behalf of the Co -Permittees, to the CRWQCB. Page 2 iv) Upon receipt of all proposed plans and their implementation schedules from all Co -Permittees, arranging for public review of these documents. Communicating with Co -Permittees regarding public comments. Packaging and forwarding.of the revised final version of these documents for CRWQCB approval. v) Keeping all Co -Permittees updated on CRWQCB and/or Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations which may impact stormwater discharge activities and Permit compliance. vi) Arranging for the collection (see section B, of this agreement, regarding funding source) and payment of all annual Permit renewal fees required by the CRWQCB. c) Design, installation, and operation of the Countywide water quality monitoring program within each drainage basin. 3. For Permit submittals which do not involve the public review process, each Co -Permittee shall be responsible to submit these items to the Principal Permittee 30 calendar days prior to the dead lines specified in the Permit. This 30 day period will enable the Principal Permittee to package and forward these documents, on behalf of all Permittees, to CRWQCB. 4. For Permit submittals which involve the public review process, the Co -Permittee shall be responsible to submit these items to the Principal Permittee 90 calendar days prior to the dead lines specified in the Permit. The Principal Permittee shall_schedule the submittals for public input, route public comment back to Co -Permittees for possible refinement of documents, arrange to receive final documents, and package and forward documents to the CRWQCB for their review and approval., 5. Each Co -Permittee shall :agree to prepare all Permit required submittals in a format determined by the Principal Permittee. 6. All Permittees shall adopt a water pollution control ordinance regulating stormwater/urban runoff discharges to the storm drain system. Such an ordinance shall include prohibition of the deposit of -waste material, or discharge, or cause the deposit or discharge of any waste material or effluent into any storm drain system. It shall also prohibit any non-NPDES permitted discharges into any storm drain system. Violators of this ordinance may be subject to penalties including but not limited to fines and termination of the activity causing the violation. Such an ordinance shall also include a provision in which all Co -Permittees allow the County of Los Angeles to have enforcement authorities over County -owned drainage facilities within the jurisdictional boundaries of each Page 3 Co -Permittee. Such provisions shall authorize the County of Los Angeles to cause the immediate termination of any non-NPDES permitted discharge which outlets directly into drainage facilities owned and operated by the County. 7. Each Co -Permittee shall be responsible for the elimination of all existing non-NPDES permitted discharges to its storm drain system, as required by the Permit. Each Co -Permittee shall be responsible for responding to illegal discharge/dumping incidents involving its storm drain system and shall conduct any needed cleanup, investigation, and remediation activities. B. FUNDINGS 1. Each Permittee shall be responsible for funding the implementation of the Permit within its jurisdictional boundaries. 2. The Principal Permittee shall also be responsible for funding of Permit implementation efforts for all storm drains owned and operated by Los Angeles County. 3. As determined by the Principal Permittee, funding for Permit, requirements which benefit the drainage basin as a whole (such as a Countywide monitoring program and annual Permit fees) shall be provided through the Flood Control District Benefit Assessment (FCDBA). 4. A separate funding agreement to fund the Permit activities specified in section A.2.b) shall be required between the Principal Permittee and any Co -Permittee not subject to the FCDBA. Negotiation of such agreements shall be solely between the Principal Permittee and the Co -Permittee in question. C. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH AGREEMENT 1. Any Permittee not in compliance with the Permit_sh,a.1l be subject to regulatory action by the Permit enforcement agencies. 2. All Permittees not in compliance with this agreement, shall reimburse the other permittee(s) for any costs incurred as the result of such non -compliances. D. ADDITIONAL PARTIES 1. Any entity signing this agreement shall comply with all its' provisions. 2. All entities which officially become Co -Permittees at a later date, subsequent to the signing of this agreement, shall comply with all the requirements of the Permit, except that the time frame for Page 4 completion of tasks shall be adjusted per mutual agreement between the new Co -Permittee in question, the Principal Permittee, and the CRWQCB. E. WITHDRAWAL FROM AGREEMENT 1. Written notice to all Permittees (60 days prior to the effective date) shall be required of any permittee wishing to redrawn from this agreement. 2. A withdrawing Permittee shall be responsible for all penalties/costs associated with such withdrawal. F. AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT 1. This agreement may be amended by consent of the Principal Permittee and a two-thirds majority of the Co -Permittees. 2. Any amendment shall be in compliance with the requirements and regulations set forth by -the CRWQCB. G. APPENDAGE OF AGREEMENT 1. Any Permittee may negotiate a separate agreement with other Co -Permittees or with all Co -Permittees regarding stormwater/urban runoff discharge management issues. Such agreements will not be appended to this agreement but will be regarded as a separate agreement. However, it may reference this agreement. H. LIFE OF THE AGREEMENT The term of this agreement commends on its execution by each of the duly authorized representatives of the Permittees. The life of the agreement shall extend as long as an NPDES-Permit regulating stormwater/urban runoff discharges encompassing the drainage basin tributary to Los Angeles County is required. _. I. NOTICES All notices and correspondences shall be deemed duly given, if a) sent by certified U.S. mail; b) delivered by hand; or c) three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid and confirmation by phone immediately after deposit in the U.S. Mail. J. GOVERNING LAW This agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with laws of the State of California. If any provision(s) of this agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired hereby. FK:mp/NPDES.LAR DRAFT WORKPLAN FOR THE STORMWATER/URBAN RUNOFF MONITORING PROGRAM STORM WATER/URBAN RUNOFF MONITORING PROGRAM INTRODUCTION DRAFT One of the requirements of the NPDES Permit issued to Los Angeles County and Co -Permittees, is the preparation of a workplan for the development of a storm water/urban runoff monitoring program. The objectives of the monitoring program are: 1) to gather data related to the quality of runoff from various land uses so as to identify possible sources of pollution, and 2) identify illegal discharges and/or locations of illicit disposal practices. MONITORING CONSTITUENTS The constituents to be monitored are listed in Attachment I. The selection of monitoring constituents was based on an evaluation of the EPA final storm water regulations and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) existing monitoring program. Initially, the constituents monitored during dry weather and under storm conditions will be the same. As water quality data is gathered over time and analyzed, revisions to the list of constituents monitored for both dry weather and under storm conditions may be made as deemed appropriate. SAMPLING PROCEDURES Sample Collection: Two types of samples will be collected at each monitoring location, a compos- ite sample and a grab sample. The composite sample will be collected by an automatic storm water sampler, equipped with an intake hose and strainer, which collects representative samples from a flow stream of a minimum depth of z -inch. The sampler consists of a pump, sample containers, and a controller. The sampler will be refrigerated to ensure the in-situ quality of the sample. The composite samples will be collected as follows: 1. Storm: During a storm event, a sample will be collected each time a set volume of water has passed the monitoring point (a flow -composite sample). A flow meter will be connected to the sampler to provide the necessary flow measurement. The sample will be distributed into one or more glass containers enclosed within the refrigerated sampler. The containers will need to accumulate a minimum of eight liters of runoff during each storm, so as to insure that there is a sufficient sample volume available to perform the necessary laboratory analysis. The automated sampler will require a period of calibration so as to choose the optimum sample volume and flow volume necessary to ensure the eight -liter minimum is met for the majority of storms. The length of the calibration period will be depen- dent on the number of storms available. — Page 2 2. Dry Weather: During dry weather, a composite sample will be collected consisting of a sample volume being taken on a fixed -time interval of one hour over a 24-hour period. For both storm and dry weather sampling, the composite sample will be used to test for nitrates, phenols, heavy metals, suspended solids, pesticides, semivolatile organics, and PCB's. A grab sample will be collected each time the composite samples are retrieved. The grab sample will be used to monitor bacteria, oil and grease, and volatile organic compounds. A rain gauge will be, located within each drainage area monitored to measure precipitation during storm events. Sample Retrieval: For storm events, the sampleswill be retrieved as soon as practicable after the occurrence of a storm. Dry weather samples shall be retrieved on the first weekday, excluding Friday, following sample collection. County person- nel will retrieve the sample bottles from the various monitoring sites and deliver them to the laboratory for analysis. MONITORING FREQUENCY Storm: Composite samples will be taken from three to five storms per year, based on the number of representative storms. A representative storm occurs when the automatic sampler activates due to the water level in the channel or storm drain being indicative of a storm. The level of activation will be above the maximum -observed diurnal water surface elevation. Dry Weather: The proposed initial frequency for dry weather monitoring of the listed constituents is every other month. This frequency was established based on the assumption that the majority of the flow during dry weather comes from discharges that are presently covered with an industrial NPDES Permit. The deviation in the test results from time to time would, therefore, be expected to be minor. This frequency will provide a cost-effective method of producing data which can be used to address program objectives. As water quality data is gathered under the proposed monitoring program, it may be necessary to increase the frequency of monitoring for particular constituents to improve accuracy. It may also be possible to decrease the frequency for testing of constituents not shown to be a concern or not cost effective. Page 3 SITE SELECTION In order to meet the objectives of the program, monitoring sites will need to be chosen throughout the drainage system. In addition to monitoring specific land uses, sites will need to be established at specific locations throughout the drainage basin to assist in the tracking of possible sources of pollution. Therefore, in selecting areas for monitoring, the following criteria will be considered: Existing Land Use: Each drainage basin has been divided into smaller drainage areas based on existing land use, topography, and the alignment of the existing storm drain system. Where possible, drainage area boundaries have been drawn to isolate individual land uses. However, due to existing land use patterns and topogra- phy, most drainage areas contain multiple land uses. The existing land use has been compiled by incorporating zoning maps provided by each Co -Permittee within the Santa Monica Basin and through field observations. At present we have identified seven different land use types. The County Department of Regional Planning is involved in a project which is mapping the existing land use for all of Los Angeles County. The data will be available in digitized form for use by automated mapping systems. It is estimated that this data will be available by the end of 1991. This data will replace the existing land use information we have compiled. This will provide a much more accurate picture as to the existing land use in each drainage area. A change in the number of individual land use types may occur based on this new data. Monitoring sites shall be located so that each identified land use will have its water quality sampled by a minimum of one monitoring site. Pollutant Source Identification Water quality data from land uses within monitored drainage areas can be used to estimate the water quality for runoff from drainage areas not having monitoring sites. In order to identify the source of pollutants that may be found within larger watersheds, several monitoring sites at various drainage areas within a watershed may be necessary. Strategic sites throughout the watershed will be selected, taking into account the number of drainage areas in the watershed, their existing land use, and storm drain alignments. Temporary monitoring sites may be established within a given drainage area to assist in pinpointing specific, pollutant sources. Page 4 Existence of Dry Weather Flows: Since we are required to sample dry weather flows, each potential monitoring site shall be examined for the existence of dry weather flows. The examina- tion will involve reviewing existing stream gage records, where available, and/or field investigation. Since the number of sites where stream gage data is available will be limited, most sites will require field investigation. The field investigation will entail repeated trips during the course of the dry season to visually verify the existence of sufficient dry weather flow for sampling. If inadequate dry weather flow is available at a specific candidate site, alternate site(s) shall be investigated. A monitoring site with inadequate or no dry weather flow shall only be chosen if the site is a strategic location for storm sampling or there exists a known or strongly suspected illegal discharge/disposal problem. Evaluation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) In order to assist in the evaluation of the effectiveness of specific BMPs, monitoring sites may be located within watersheds selected as test locations for various proposed BMPs. Suitable Location for Installation of Monitoring Equipment: Monitoring equipment needs also play an important role in the selection of monitoring sites. The automated samplers will refrigerate all samples. Therefore, a dedicated 120V AC power source will be needed. Batteries are not an acceptable source of power due to the high electrical usage that is needed for refrigeration. The sampling equipment must also be readily accessible. Ideal locations for sampling devices would be .on sidewalks, alongside the banks of an open channel, in 'protected right-of-way, etc. Existing flow monitoring stations along open channels will be examined as to their suitability in serving as water quality monitoring sites. For underground drains, sampling equipment must be located near a manhole to allow access to the drain for the sampler intake line and the flow measurement sensor, for both installation and servicing. For open channels, convenient invert access via a ramp or ladder is needed to perform this function. For storm drains located under a street, sufficient space behind the curb is needed for placement of the sampling equipment. For open channels, an access road or sufficient right-of-way adjacent to the channel is needed. Security is also an important concern, for both the equipment and personnel. Sampling equipment will need to be installed within protective enclosures to minimize vandalism and theft. The safety of field personnel servicing the equipment, during both dry and wet weather, must be considered. Page 5 PILOT TEST SITES A number of pilot test sites will be established to test the suitability of the monitoring equipment and our procedures. The site(s) will be chosen to furnish the best representation of the monitoring points as a whole. We propose to establish (to be determined) test sites at the locations listed in Attachment by (te be determined). Upon satisfactory evaluation of our equip- ment and procedures, expansion of the monitoring program throughout the entire SMBDB will begin. Assuming sufficient storms during the rainy season for analysis, expansion could begin as early as (to be determined). GWH:cr/SWOMP ATTACHMENT I Constituents EPA Method Volatile Organic Compounds Acrolein 8030 Acrylonitrile Acetonitrile Benzene 8240 Bromoform 2-Butanone Carbon disulfide Carbon Tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chlorodibromomethane Chloroethane 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromomethane 1,4-Dichloro-2-butane Dichlorobromomethane Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethylene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene Ethanol Ethylbenzene Ethyl methacrylate 2-Hexanone Iodomethane Methyl Bromide Methyl Chloride Methylene Chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Styrene 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethylene Trichlorofluoromethane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane Toluene 1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane Trichloroethylene (TCE) Vinyl acetate Vinyl Chloride Xylene 1 Constituents Semivolatile Ogranic Compounds Acids Benzoic acid Benzyl alcohol 2 -Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4 -Dimethylphenol 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol p -Chloro -m -Cresol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2,4,5 -Trichlorophenol 2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol EPA Method 8270 Base/Neutral 8270 Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Acetophenone Anthracene Aniline 4-Aminobiphenyl Benzidine Benzo(a)anthracene Chlordane 4-Chloroaniline 1-Chloronaphthalene p -Dimethylaminoazobenzene 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anth,racene alpha, alpha-Dimethylphenethylamine Benzo(a)pyrene 3,4-Benzofluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether Butylbenzyl Phthalate 2-Chloronaphthalene 4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether Chrysene Dibenz(a,j)acridine Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene p -Dichlorobenzene Constituents EPA Method Base/Neutral-continued 8270 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene 3,3-Dicholorbenzidine Diethyl Phthalate Dimethyl Phthalate Di -n -butyl Phthalate 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Di-n-octyl Phthalate Diphenylamine 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (as Azobenzene) Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone Ethyl methanesulfonate Fluoranthene Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene --- Hexachloroethane Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene Isophorone Methoxychlor 3-Methylcholanthrene 2-Methylphenol (o -cresol) 4-Methylphenol (p -cresol) Methyl methanesulfonate Naphthalene 1 -Naphthylamine 2 -Naphthylamine 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline Nitrobenzene N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodipropylamine N-Nitrosopiperidine Pentachlorobenzene Phenacetin - Phenanthrene 2-picoline Pronamide Pyrene 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Constituents EPA Method Pesticides 8080 Aldrin Alpha -BHC Beta -BHC Delta -BHC Gamma -BHC -(Lindane) Chlordane 4,4 -DDE 4,4 -DDD 4,4 -DDT Dieldrin Alpha-Endosulfan Beta-Endosulfan Endosulfan Sulfate Endrin Endrin Aldehyde Heptachlor Heptachlor Epoxide Methoxychlor Toxaphene Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB's) 8080 PCB -1016 PCB -1221 PCB -1232 PCB -1242 PCB -1248 PCB -1254 PCB -1260 Metals EPA Method Soluble Metals 200.7 Antimony, Total 200.7 Arsenic, Total 206.2 Barium 200.7 Beryllium, Total _ 200.7 Cadmium, Total 200.7 Calcium 200.7 Chromium, Total 200.7 Copper, Total 200.7 Cyanide, Total 335.3 Iron - 200.7 Lead, Total 239.2 Magnesium 200.7 Manganese 200.7 Mercury, Total 245.1 Nickel, Total 200.7 Potassium 200.7 Selenium, Total - 270.2 Silver, Total 200.7 Metals EPA Method Sodium 200.7 Thallium, Total 200.7 Zinc, Total 200.7 Others Constituents EPA Methods Standard Methods Dissolved Phosphorus 365.2 Total Phosphorus 365.2 Turbidity 180.1 Phenols, Total 604 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 160.2 Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 160.1 Volatile Suspended Solids(VSS) 160.4 Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 415.1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon 418.1 Oil and Grease 413.1 pH 150.1 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) 405.1 Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) - — 410.1 Total Coliform 909A Fecal Coliform 909C Fecal Streptococcus 910A & 910B Total Ammonia Nitroaen 350.2 Total Kleldahl Nitrogen 351.3 Nitrate plus Nitrite 354.1 418E Alkalinity 310.1 Specific Conductance 120.1 Total Hardness 130.1 Boron ` 212.3 Chloride 325.3 407A Fluoride 350.2 Sulfate 375.3 Herbicides tested at spreading grounds Prometryn Atrazine Simazine Cyanazine TJS:/MONCONST 5 November 19, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 10, 1991 APPEAL OF CITY POLICY REGARDING A DRIVEWAY APPROACH WITHIN THE PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAY AT 760 MONTEREY BOULEVARD Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Waive the condition imposed by the City Council at its May 22, 1990 regular meeting at which time a recorded encroachment permit was required, said permit indicating that "if the public should ever want or need to use that fifteen (15) feet of street right of way for any future purpose, then the property owner would lose all driveway access rights to his garage with no recourse against the City. An indemnification against flooding would also be included." 2. Require the applicant to remove and replace the handicapped access ramp, in the public right-of-way, as it is not constructed to City standards. Background: On May 22, 1990, the City Council reviewed this property and upheld the staff's opinion as to the best way to handle the problem. See attached City Council memo dated May 16, 1990. The staff recommended that, because the house was already under construction, the builder be allowed to finish the house with conditions. Those conditions were as follows: 1. An encroachment permit was required that would allow the proposed private driveway to be excavated on public property. 2. The encroachment permit would state that if the City should ever need to use the 15 feet of public street right of way that the property owner was encroaching on, he would lose the private use of that area. At the same time, he would then lose the -physical access to his garage and not have any recourse -against the City. 3. An indemnification to the City against the flooding of his garage would be required to protect the City. 4. The encroachment permit would be recorded and run with the property deed. 5. The actual language of the permit and its conditions were to be approved by the City Attorney prior to recordation. - 1 - During the past two months Mr. Goodman has been in contact with the Public Works staff and has requested approval of the construction in the public right-of-way in order that he be granted a Certificate of Occupancy. We have been unable to grant his request because of the conditions approved at the May 22, 1990 City Council meeting. The applicant indicated he could not comply with the requirements because financial institutions would not approve loans with the conditions imposed. The City Attorney and the Interim Public Works Director met to discuss the matter and determined that only the City Council could amend the conditions. Analysis: In May 1990, some six months after the building permit had been issued and construction had commenced on this property the Public Works staff noted that a problem would exist' at this location should the City decide at a later date to widen the street. The Interim Public Works Director finds that the assessment of the situation is correct, however, the appropriate time to make this determination was prior to the issuance of the building permit and not six months later after the entire structure had been framed. It appears that- staff was in error for not requiring a modified driveway design prior to ground breaking. Public Works staff has reviewed files and discussed this situation with other department employees and is unable to locate any similar conditions imposed on project with similar construction deficiencies. It is the opinion of the Interim Public Works Director that because of the status of the construction project at the time of discovery of the potential problem and because of the error made by staff in not requiring a modified structure design prior to issuance of the building permit the City Council should waive the condition noted in recommendation 1 above. It should be noted that the handicap access ramp constructed by the applicant does not meet City Standards and therefore prior to approving the project for occupancy staff will require this ramp to be removed and reconstructed. Alternatives: 1. Maintain the existing City policy on driveways and reaffirm that a certificate of occupancy will be granted upon compliance with City requirements. 2. Approve the Certificate of Occupancy with additional requirements. 3. Approve the Certificate of Occupancy with no requirements. 4. Deny the Certificate of Occupancy. Respe fully Submitted, Concur: Wiliam Glickman, Interim Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Director of Public Works ty/1t760 Manager OvFt-' Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 16, 1990 Regular Meeting of May 22, 1990 CITY POLICY REGARDING DRIVEWAY APPROACHES WITHIN THE PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAY AT 760 MONTEREY BOULEVARD AND 341 MONTEREY BOULEVARD Recommendation: It is recommended that the City council receive and file this item. Background: On May 14, 1990, The Director of Public Works prepared a memorandum t� the Public Works staff reminding staff of how driveway approaches shall be constructed within the public right of way (copy attached). The driveways are to be constructed so that all storm rainfall that lands within the public area is to flow toward the street. No drainage is to flow from the public area toward or onto private property. In some cases this requires a slope change or "grade break" in the driveway surface at the street right of way line. If the private property has a large difference in elevation from the elevation of the street, then the "driveway approach" which is that part of the driveway within the public area and the "driveway" which is that part within the private property can effect the final elevation of the house. The Uniform Building Code Chapter 29, Section 2907(d)5 pertaining to foundation elevations, (copy attached) requires that the top surface of the foundation slab shall be a minimum of 12 inches above the elevation of the street gutter plus, for drainage purposes, a 2 percent slope from the top of the curb up to the foundation slab. There are situations where the house may constructed contrary to Section 2907(d)5. Two locations are discussed next. Analysis: 760 Monterey Avenue This property is the most critical of the two locations. The wooden frame -and steel beams of this structure are already installed and the builder has the outside plywood sheathing, inside electrical wiring and plumbing installed. The property will have a basement underground garage, two full and complete floors of living space plus a loft floor area. This results in a building with a total height from the basement floor to the top of the roof ridge of 39 & 1/4 feet. The access to the garage is only available to the property if the driveway approach starts to slope downward from the back of the sidewalk, instead of the street right of way line. The allowable method is for the slope downward to begin from the street right of way line. In this case the right of way line is located 20 feet back from the face of the curb and 3 feet from the face of the building. (See attached exhibit "A"). It is doubtful any vehicle would be able to back out of a garage and up a slope if this type. Also, there would be insufficient clearance between the driveway surface and the top of the garage door opening. At this moment, the Building Department has a hold on inspections at this site (See attached letter). Based on the existing construction situation and conditions, the engineering staff is of the opinion that best way to handle this problem is to issue an encroachment permit allowing the proposed excavation and driveway to be constructed starting at the back of the sidewalk. A condition of that permit will be if the public should ever want or need to use that fifteen (15) feet of street right of way for any future purpose, then the property owner would lose all driveway access rights to his garage with no recourse against the City. An indemnification against flooding would also be included. The permit and its conditions will be required to be recorded and run with the property deed so that all future owners and lenders will be aware of this potential access lost. The actual language shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recordation. Other alternatives available are: 1. Stop construction until the existing structure can be redesigned to meet City Codes. 2. Stop construction and remove the existing framed structure to bare land. 3. Stop construction, remove the existing structure and design a new structure that meets City Codes. 341 Monterey Boulevard The existing house on this property was demolished on May 15, 1990, and the old materials have been hauled away. The building permit for the new structure has not been issued yet and the permit has a hold placed on it. This property is located on the opposite side of the street from the other property discussed and the existing land surface slopes down away from the street towards the west. In this case the building designer sloped the driveway down from the back of the sidewalk without any consideration of the street right of way location. The design of the driveway for this property is also in violation of City Code. Here again are two floors of full living space and a loft, plus a half -basement underground garage. The total height from the garage floor slab to the top of the roof is 35 feet. The comments about the driveway slopes and doorway clearance also apply to this property. (See attached exhibit "B") - 2 - C Council policy in the past has been to allow projects to proceed if they are in process. In conformance with this policy, the engineering staff recommends that the building permit be issued and that an encroachment permit with the same conditions as the permit for the other property also be issued. Discussion With City Attorney: Both matters have been discussed with the City Attorney and he concurs with the proposed actions. Future projects shall be in conformance with requirements of both the Building Department and the Public Works Department. Respectfully Submitted Z/76//-- Lynn % Lynn A. Terry P.E. Deputy City Engineer cc: Concur: Anthony Antich Director of Public Works UNAVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE William Grove Director of Building & Safety Kevin B. Norl.hcraft City Manager Property owner and Builder,' 760 Monterey Boulevard Property owner and Builder, 341 Monterey Boulevard ty/drive CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: Lynn A. Terry, Deputy City Engineer FROM: Anthony Antich, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Driveway Approaches and Sidewalks DATE: May 14, 1990 All grade breaks shall occur at the property line. All runoff shall be directed to the public right of way. No runoff shall be allowed to flow toward or onto private property. cc: Gary Wheaton, Engineering Technician ‘:c =tAl- j,‘/v4- 2907 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE slope drainage, erosion and shallow failures. Except as provided for in Subsection 6 of this section and Figure No. 29-1, the following criteria will be assumed to provide this protection. Where the existing slope is steeper than 1 horizontal to 1 vertical, the toe of the slope shall be assumed to be at the intersection of a horizontal plane drawn from the top of the foundation and a plane drawn tangent to the slope at an angle of 45 degrees to the horizontal. Where a retaining wall is constructed at the toe of the slope, the height of the slope shall be measured from the top of the wall to the top of the slope. 3. Footing setback from descending slope surface. Footing on or adjacent to slope surfaces shall be founded in firm material with an embedment and setback from the slope surface sufficient to provide vertical and lateral support for the footing without detrimental settlement. Except as provided for in Subsection 6 of this section and Figure No. 29-1, the following setback is deemed adequate to meet the criteria. Where the slope is steeper than 1 horizontal to 1 vertical, the required setback shall be measured from an imaginary plane 45 degrees to the horizontal, projected upward from the toe of the slope. 4. Pools. The setback between pools regulated by this code and slopes shall be equal to one half the building footing setback distance required by this section. That portion of the pool wall within a horizontal distance of 7 feet from the top of the slope shall be capable of supporting the water in the pool without soil support. 5. Foundation elevation. On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus 2 percent. The building official may approve alternate elevations, provided it can be demon- strated that required drainage to the point of discharge and away from the structure is provided at all locations on the site. 6. Alternate setback and clearance. The building official may approve alternate setbacks and clearances. The building official may require an investiga- tion and recommendation of a qualified engineer to demonstrate that the intent of this section has been satisfied. Such an investigation shall include consideration of material, height of slope, slope gradient. load intensity and erosion characteris- tics of slope material. (e) Footing Design. Except for special provisions of Section 2909 covering the design of piles, all portions of footings shall be designed in accordance with the strucniral provisions of this code and shall be designed to minimize differential settlement and the effects of expansive soils when present. Slab -on -grade and mat -type footings for buildings located on expansive, soils may be designed in accordance -with the provisions of U.B.C. Standard No. 29-4 or such other engineering design based upon geotechnical recommendation as s approved by the building official. (f) Foundation Plates or Sills. Foundation plates or sills shall be bolted to the foundation or foundation wall with not less than t/2 -inch nominal diameter steel r _bolts embedded at least 7 inches into the concrete or masonry and spaced not more than 6 feet apart. There shall be a minimum of two bolts per piece with one bolt E located within 12 inches of each end of each piece. A properly sized nut and 596 May 16, 1990 � City o f `�iermosarl3eaclL Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Kurt D. Gunderiock P.O. Box 7000-376 Redondo beach, California 90277 Re: New S.F.R -760 Monterey Dear Sir: This department has been apprised of the discussion between you and the Public Works Department concerning the elevation of the driveway within the public right of way, exiting the residence onto Monterey Blvd. This matter of encroachment into the public right of way will be presented to the City Council at the regular meeting on Tuesday, May 22. Be advised that no inspections will be on this project until this matter has been resolved. Very truly yours, 6i�TyrvdezC��1 Carol Williams 17.4 F -410' 'P ` }-11a ..c_xv STREET R/61/7" of F WAY 6-Roe/ND SL opE PER coo E• Io2.45-� v REI a✓'x14,- - Few F&- 8 • .�� F3S W iO x I L� L L. —1 • Fr. .. -4 InislisimuraaamIIIII. .I,onin.Ia Iiui111l111lal11111 II®I 10.0.0 % -JN T 1 L L_ i FB 20 WOx� x!7•-1 S. - r .w .i 1,^4 ►LAP •c . >.�o W W. M • L5',' ? .n' DRTh L. C' Q EXHIBIT "A" mizsIGUM • • • �r...smeacK PIXw,o r 193'-03s . Co" TAP ED ul'1'ST 110.-3%. Ar 6GT"AcK MAX N VENT Y84r /2G' 9%}"rl 2x467Z.z •gCK g-// ' z Y • PLy %"67urfn kN %z m'•9" 0: ;1 i.s!i UJ(i0030,1UU1li!'J, tO'Jl;lJ �' . .....x-z�rw...rsz ..) n /15=8' /Geo =4Yz" STREET R/G/1T of N�i9Y CRo`NO sYoPE- ,O4'R cgo4-. oe "417', r� Nnhki EXHIBIT "B" Li , e „• t.:"/e ,Ay,1• .4,17-4774. g .1 t. *4 Vi (4.1 -117i' OCT 311991 City Clerk City at Hermosa Beach 1')\ N,;•-j.nr-r(3)\ - e- - - 6;47di /7-k7 a l'zazzc_ (i67-2/1 /-16 //6.d ^1, j / 114-4_ - 7 • _; ee .ee "4-/- Z--7;?-e -z- • 07.,/ /12/ ---67 a--6 (211 -a -i- (2 • ‘2, ,.• e 7 ' e-gi(./t-/r'---c-t,Z-- -, / p . / - 7 :t7---dtl," ttzetAl cexte-/ olio/u ,1( ,/ '/3 -T. eb - 2 6 0 Ho ArT ke V 1.:> iciWtjf,9 g Goodman David 8 Jeanne 1225 West Avenue 37 Los Angeles, CA 90065 t (---7:1 OCT 311991 - City Clerk \' city at M�rmcso Balch ` . TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Council `a ',- ;\:' City Hall711�=' Hermosa Beach, Ca. J-1.71 —,. / DATE: 31 October 1991 RE: Certificate of Occupancy, 760 Monterey Blvd. My wife and I recently completed construction of a home at the above address. It was built in accordance with plans submitted by Gary Lane, a licensed architect of this city. Construction was carried out by Kurt Gunderlock who has built many homes in this city and elsewhere in the beach area. Construction was initiated in October 1989 under Building Permit #21616, issued 10/16/89. Work continued until May, 1990 when the Public Works Department objected 'to the direction of slope of the driveway, which lies on the public right of way. On May 16 the Building Depart- ment announced it would perform no inspections until the problem with Public Works was resolved. At the City Council meeting of 22 May 1990, Anthony Antich (then Director) informed this Council of the prob- lem. He proposed that our home, approximately 3/4 com- plete, either be torn down or that his department issue an Encroachment Permit covering the driveway, conditioned on a Deed Restriction. Both were to be recorded and to run with the property. The Council voted to "receive and file" this item. Despite this, no such demand was ever made on us. We continued work. The Buildings and Public Works Depart- ments seemed to have decided not to act on the matter. In fact a Mechanical Permit (#98038) was issued on May 31; and inspections were performed on June 5, June 7 and June 27. This effectively reversed the Administrative Hold that Carol Williams had established in his letter of May 16. By August Mr. Gunderlock was ready to proceed with the driveway and other concrete work supervised by Public Works. To that end he spoke with Gary Wheaton at Public Works who said he would detail what the Department required and would perform inspections. Both men double- checked this with Carol Williams at the Buildings Depart- ment who affirmed that there was no Administrative Hold on permits or inspections, that all administrative problems had been cleared, and that there would be no hold up at the Final Inspection regarding the driveway and its approach. He thus, once again, confirmed reversal of the "hold" he had established on May 16. Gary Wheaton met at the site with Kurt Gunderlock and a partner of T.B.S. Contracting, a well-established paving contractor which, I have been assured, has done considerable work in this city. Mr. Wheaton reviewed what Public Works wanted with regard to sidewalk, curb, gutter and pavement. Subsequently the Department of Public Works issued Permit # 4403, dated 9/4/90, covering "Drive approach, curb, sidewalk, gutter", without special restrictions or other performance demands. Forms were inspected by Mr. Wheaton and pours were made, all under the aegis of the Department of Public Works and without an intervening demand for a deed restriction. When construction was complete the Department of Buildings and Safety performed its Final Inspection and signed off the work. Imagine our consternation, then, when Public Works refused the request to sign off so that we might apply for a Certificate of Occupancy. We beg you to relieve us of this burden. We have depended on the administrative structure of this city in making this very heavy investment in a home. D.P.W. in particular has not acted with an even hand. It has approved our plans and awarded us Permits yet, when work was completed in accordance with these plans and their requirements, they say approvals should not have been given. This is patently not right. Furthermore, while making our lives a misery, they have permitted numerous other projects built in the same way with respect to the driveway approach,. to proceed to completion. Nine of these are located on Monterey Blvd., seven on Manhattan, and at least ten on other streets, including Prospect. We have paid our taxes as they have rapidly spiralled upward with an assessed value considerably in excess of its real value without a Certificate of Occu- pancy. Needless to say, the prejudicial manner in which the Department of Public Works has handled this matter has put us in considerable financial jeopardy. We would, therefore, appreciate a hearing as soon as possible. Vey truly yours, David Ik Goodman City o f `�iermosa rl3each� November 06, 1991 Mr. and Mrs. David Goodman 1225 West Avenue 37 Los Angeles, CA 90065 Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 RECEIVED NOV ti 1991 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. RE: Appeal to the City Council of Hermosa Beach due to the Oc- tober 24, 1991, decision of the Interim Public Works Direc- tor to advise the applicant to seek an appeal before the City Council in order to resolve the question of signing off on driveway construction in order for a Certificate of Oc- cupancy to be obtained for property at 760 Monterey Blvd. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Goodman: Your appeal of the subject decision, filed October 31, 1991, has been scheduled for a Public Hearing before the Hermosa Beach City Council on Tuesday, December 10, 1991, at 8:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. This hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of City Hall, at 1315 Valley Drive. Posting of the property must be done at least 10 days prior to the above meeting, and as proof of posting, an affidavit must be returned to the Clerk's office prior to that meeting. The neces- sary affidavit and posters may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. The posters must be posted on the affected property prior to November 27, 1991. If you wish to submit any written evidence to be considered by the City Council at this meeting, we request that it be received by the Public Works Department by noon on Thursday, December 05, 1991, for inclusion in the City Council agenda packets. A staff report may be obtained on or about Thursday, December 05, 1991, at the end of the business day, from the Public Works Department. Please address any questions to that department at 318-0214. Very truly yours, 'kr7gCt- Naoma Valdes Deputy City Clerk cc: City Manager Public Works Department CITY =!F EXCAVAT CITY HALL HERfOSA BEACH STREET ON — COTRUCTI06V N4 4403 PERMIT NUMBER APPLICATION [Vi PERMIT P LIC WORKS DEPARTM5 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERM SA BEACH, CALIF. 90254 INSPECTION REQUIRED PHONE 376-6984 Ext. 14 24 HRS. NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS STATE HIGHWAY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. (IF REQUIRED OFFICE COPY ISSUED Br Yri-ir DATE PER4�qED FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN (PLEASE PRINT) DATE OF APPLICATION JOB ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT NO. BLOCK NO. BOND OR DEPOSIT TRACT .yCASH DEPOSIT IN THE AMOUNT SHOWN BELOW ) BOND (MINIMUM AMOUNT 5300.00) I LJ�) n ANNUAL BOND OR DEPOSIT # D WAIVED O ALL FEES WAIVED OWNER/ PERMITTEE MAILING ADDRESS PROPOSED WORK DEPOSIT INSPECTIO; FEE CITY EMERGENCY TEL. NO. SQ. FT. PVMT. CONTRACTOR ADDRESS _-+u rfi - (� �A �^ �� " iYi- (PrO t ( 7(1-)0 - J CITY V 1 ,� - / c97? TEL.RNO. �Lf Q -/ SQ. FT. DIRT STATE LIC. NO. CITY LIC. NO. LIN. FT. CURB & GUTTER @ LIN. FT. CURB DESCRIPTION OF WORK IALIDATION OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE HELD TO PERMIT OR TO BE AN APPROVAL OF THE VIOLATION OF ANY APPLICABLE PROVISION OF CITY CODE COVERING THIS WORK. OR ANY OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE. SQ. FT. SIDEWALK SQ. FT. DRIVEWAY PLANTERS THNO STREET MAY BE CLOSED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM !!�� E CITY ENGINEER. NO STREET MAY BE CLOSED UNLESS AT LEAST 24 HOURS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND POLICE DEPARTMENT. IT SHALL BE THE PERMITTEES RESPONSIBILITY ALONE TO NOTIFY SAID DEPARTMENTS AND TO PROPERLY BARRICADE AND PROTECT ANY EXCAVATIONS OR CLOSURES. / Y THE, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH IS HELD HARMLESS FROM THE RESULTS OF ANY ACTION OR ACCIDENTS CAUSED BY THE PERMITTEE, HIS EMPLOYEES OR EQUIPMENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED OR COVERED IN THIS PERMIT. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICA- TION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMA GIVEN IS CORRECT. I AGREE TO COMPLY WIT ALL APPL)CABLE CITY ORDI- NANCES AND STATE.LAWS AN ITH THE REO�LIREMENTS OF HIS PERMIT. PER SIURE 1/ AUTHORIYED AGENT OTHER OTHER TOTAL DEPOSIT ADDITIONAL FEE FOR ��FjT.D1t6/ PERMIT FEE $25.00 TOTAL FEES THE HARD COPY OF THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES TO BE SHOWN TO ANY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE CITY UPON REQUEST. APPROVALS/INSPECTIONS DATE r RECEIPT STAMP APPLICATION APPROVED FORMS/ BACKFILL INSP. V FINAL INSP. B RELEASE DEPOSIT REFUNDED (BOND RETURNED) FRAMING Floor Joists. Rough Electrical Rough Plumbinb Gas Water 4)\, DWV l% Rough Mechanical Platform/Acce Piping Vents/Duct Roof Sheathin: 4 -/z -yr) Roof Insulation Framin Insulation -� Other Approved To Cover * COVER NO WORK UNTIL ABOVE IS SIGNED * 1 D — INTERIOR Gyp Lath Gyp Wall Board W/P Lath Other EXTERIOR A I Lath /` - 7 o Veneer/Fastening Plaster Other NAILING/FASTENING TO BE SIGNED BEFORE TAPE OR PLASTER APPLIED MISCELLANEOUS Sewer Connection Curb Permit No Sublist Fencing Fire Sprinklers FINALS Electrical Plumbin Ga Mechanical * Post This Card in a Conspicuous Place * BUILDING INSPECTION CARD CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING PHONE 318-0235, CITY HALL Job Address D. Good Owner Ph Lot / Bloc / Tra Building Permit No 9-6 Date Building Contractor 6�r1d=// Phone. Electrical Permit No 71r, ?f � 4 Date Electrical Contractor LI ... n• Phon Plumbing Permit No - ' Date P!uwnbing Contractor Phone Mechanical Permit No 64 3. Date -3t 3' Mechanical Contractor `z 6:; "PPne Sewer Permit No Sewer Use House Sewer Parks & Rec. Facility Tax 1 Temp. Power Permit No 3_"r. Approved Demo Permit Date Demo Contractor Phone Demolition FOUNDATION Forms �'�" Steel _760 Trion Gas okayed Elect. okayed 8 c�1u 1,1 ' t Job Completed Certificate of Occupancy DO NOT POUR SLAB FLOOR UNTIL ABOVE IS SIGNED Grade Other Approval to Pour DO NOT POUR CONCRETE UNTIL CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR Steel Electrical (ground work) Plumbing (ground work) Gas Piping iR qo A. Other Approval to Pour 1.SF •� •'~T#�;�-lrz�. w'.,C`aFi K+�y�.� •:r�sz',r."�ii i�;c5u�_'. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council FROM: William M. Glickman, Interim Director of Public Works SUBJECT: HEARING ON PARK PACIFIC/AVIATION BOULEVARD TRAFFIC CONCERNS DATE: December 3, 1991 Based upon the City Council's action of November 26, 1991, the attached Item has been placed on the present agenda for reconsideration. W' iam M. Glickman In erim Director of Public Works Noted: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Attachment memoerpp Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council October 2, 1991 Regular Meeting of -November 12, -l-991 December 10, 1991 HEARING ON PARK PACIFIC/AVIATION BOULEVARD TRAFFIC CONCERNS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Conduct a hearing to discuss the prohibition of curb parking on Aviation Boulevard in order to safely install and operate separate left turn channelization on Aviation Boulevard at the Park Pacific Shopping Center driveway. 2. Formally request the Park Pacific Shopping Center property owner to initiate the Permit Engineering Evaluation Report (PEER) together with a traffic engineering consultant study as outlined in the attached Caltrans June 27, 1991 correspondence to the_ City_of Hermosa Beach. Background: Item 1 The City Council at its regular meeting on July 23, 1991 approved the setting of a hearing to determine whether a separate left turn lane be established on Aviation Boulevard at the Park Pacific Shopping Center driveway. For safety of operation in conjunction with the separate left turn lane, the City Traffic Engineer believes that curb parking along the north side_of Aviation Boulevard should be removed. Other options for driveway control are outlined in the attached report. Item 2 The attached June 27, 1991 letter from Caltrans to the City of Hermosa Beach states that: (a) Caltrans does not perform feasibility studies for improvements to benefit adjacent private properties. (b) The PEER -process is available to allow owners of adjacent property to provide detailed information that will allow Caltrans to determine if a traffic signal at the private driveway is warranted and should be installed. -(c) A consulting traffic engineering report is usually included with the permittees report. 1 Alternative: 1. Retain existing parking and pavement striping and not install left turn channelization. 2. City share in the cost of preparing a traffic engineering consultant study. Respectfully Submitted: Concur: NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE Ed Ruzak WiYijiam Gliicccma', Interim City Traffic Engineer Director of Public Works Steve Wisniewski, Acting City Manager pworks/erpp Aviation Driveway A discussion of the advantage and disadvantages relative to safety and efficiency of instituting the following three concerns provides insight for selection of reasonable mitigation. 1. - Eastbound, separate left turn into driveway - "KEEP CLEAR" ��,rkings - No Left Turn out o driveway Advantages a. The left turns into the shopping center are sheltered from eastbound through traffic. b. The left turners have a clear opening to make their left turn into the center. The driveway is not blocked. c. Right angle accident potential involving left turns out of the center is eliminated. Disadvantages a. Left turns out of the center must be made onto Pacific Coast Highway. Then traffic must go through the Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation signal to turn left in order to proceed eastbound. b. Traffic has to circulate within the already congested shopping center. c. Left turns from southbound Pacific Coast Highway to eastbound Aviation have to enter the curb lane and merge with the northbound to eastbound free right turn traffic. This is due to the use of the center lane as a separate left turn lane. Sideswipe accident potential would increase. 3 2. - Eastbound separate left turn into driveway - "KEEP CLEAR,' markings All exit turns from driveway allowed - Same as la, lb - Same as lc Adva images Disadvantages 2a. Accident potential for left turns out of center being struck by vehicles coming from Pacific Coast Highway to eastbound Aviation is increased. This is due to limited visibility created by vehicles stopped in the eastbound separate left turn lane. 2b. If vehicles in the westbound travel lane stop to keep the driveway area clear and allow the left turns out of the driveway to proceed, there is a high potential for: 1. A rear end type accident between the stopped westbound vehicle and, 2. The northbound (PCH) to eastbound (Aviation) right turning vehicles. - 4 - 3. - Eastbound separate left turn into driveway - No "KEEP CLEAR" markings - No Left Turn out of driveway - Same as la, is - Same as la, lb, is Advantages Disadvantages 3a. Eastbound left turns into the center will be blocked by westbound vehicles that back up from the Pacific Coast Highway signal 3b. Right turns out of center will be blocked by westbound through traffic backup. - 5 - 4. - Eastbound separate left turn into driveway - No "KEEP CLEAR" markings - All exit turns allowed Same as la Same as 3a, 3b Advantages Disadvantages 4a. Left turns out of the center may have visibility limited due to eastbound vehicles stopped in the left turn lane. 4a y C2, PACIFIC 111116 1,, COAST '., HIGarr Y 5. - No eastbound separate left turn into driveway - No "BEEP CLEAR" markings - All turns allowed Advantages This is existing condition that is subject of review. Its only advantage is that it has been operating in this manner with a minimal accident history. Disadvantages - Same as 3a, 3b 5a. Left turns into the center must stop in the number one through lane in order to make the left turn into the center. Rear end accident potential is increased; sideswipe accident potential increased. - 7 - 6. - No eastbound separate left turn lane into driveway - No ',KEEP CLEAR,' markings - No Left Turn out of driveway - Same as lc Advantages Disadvantages - Same as la, lb, 3a, 3b, 5a oC I`\ Noe „dei,. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY 7. - No eastbound separate left turn lane into driveway - CLEAR,' markings - All turns allowed - Same as lb - Similar to 2a Advantages Disadvantages 8. - No eastbound separate left turn lane into driveway - ',KEEP CLEAR'! markings - No Left Turn out of driveway Advantages - Same as lb 8a. Right turns out of center will have better opportunity to enter westbound flow Disadvantages - Same as la, ib __mete A PACIFIC COAST Mi w• // / > >i HIGHWAY - 10 - Discussion: The various scenarios point out the obvious fact that limited conflicts at the Aviation driveway are best achieved by control, i.e., prohibition of the left turn out of the center. This is not a desirable option from the property owners standpoint since it reduces the ability of his customers to egress the development. Discussions between the property owner and Caltrans have been ongoing with respect to the potential for a traffic signal at the shopping Center's Pacific Coast Highway driveway. The City Traffic Engineer's previous report recommended consideration of a traffic signal at the Pacific Coast Highway driveway for left turns into the Center and right turns out. It did not envision left turns being allowed out of the Center with the signal. Nonetheless, Caltrans, the governing agency over Pacific Coast Highway has been discussing the possibility of including this signal with left turns out of the driveway. If these movements are allowed with signalization then the need for a left turn onto Aviation Boulevard is decreased dramatically. Internal shopping - center circulation would allow the users to exit onto Pacific Coast Highway, thence turn left onto eastbound Aviation with the existing signal. The potential signalization of the Pacific Coast Highway driveway is not imminent. Thus, it is necessary to address other treatments for the existing left turn egress from the Aviation driveway. Left Turn Ingress to Aviation Boulevard Driveway: It is feasible to restore the separate left turn pocket for eastbound access into the shopping center driveway from Aviation Boulevard. The pocket was in existence prior to the slurry seal project on Aviation Boulevard which took place approximately one year ago. After the slurry seal it was decided to eliminate the separate turn lane in favor of having a two lane eastbound "release" for the traffic that turned from southbound Pacific Coast Highway to eastbound Aviation Boulevard It was believed at the time that the magnitude of the southbound to eastbound turns was such that a two lane entry to eastbound Aviation would allow more efficient operation and reduce the number of vehicles that had to "store" in the southbound Pacific Coast Highway left turn pocket. This has not proven to be the case. The southbound left turn lane does not clear in each cycle with the present striping situation on Aviation Boulevard. It is our belief that dual left turns for southbound Pacific Coast Highway along with a re -design of the Pacific Coast Highway/Aviation intersection are needed to improve operation. Thus, we do agree with a re -striping of the number are eastbound lane to provide some left turn storage for vehicles wishing to enter the shopping center. This restriping is not without drawbacks as stated in several of the previous scenarios. The vehicle queue in the separate left turn lane will provide a visual obstruction to left turning vehicles that egress from the shopping center. Also the southbound PCH left turns must merge with the northbound to eastbound free right turns. This merge takes place immediately after the turn which is a high accident potential. Left Turn Egress From Aviation Driveway: The subject left turn is a difficult maneuver to make during peak periods due to the heavy westbound traffic flow and the eastbound traffic among around the curve from northbound Pacific Coast Highway. By providing a "KEEP CLEAR" area across the eastbound Aviation lanes, a vehicle should be able to "creep out" to a point where it would only have to merge into the westbound lanes. This is where the major problem with the "KEEP CLEAR" area arises. Vehicles exiting the drive will not be able to see the vehicles traveling eastbound (from northbound Pacific Coast Highway) because of: 1. Vehicles queued in the separate left turn pocket westbound 2. The curve formed by the free right turn from northbound Pacific Coast Highway to eastbound Aviation The potential for accident involving the left turning vehicles would be increased in our opinion with this situation. The left turners would believe they now have the "right of way" due to the "KEEP CLEAR" area and disregard the northbound to eastbound traffic. A mitigation that has merit in order to reduce this accident potential is as follows: - Paint a "KEEP CLEAR" area on the eastbound Aviation Boulevard lanes in the vicinity of the shopping center driveway. - Paint a six inch solid white lane line between the two eastbound Aviation Boulevard lanes from Pacific Coast Highway to a point 100 feet east of the subject driveway. - Paint pavement arrows to inform the left turn egress traffic that they should enter the number one eastbound traffic lane. Place candlestick type cones on the six inch white line to restrict the left turn egress traffic from entering the number two eastbound lane and from having the northbound to eastbound movement merge from the number two lane to the number one lane in the vicinity of the subject driveway or near Aubrey Lane. This configuration should provide a shelter for the left turn if the "KEEP CLEAR" area is observed and the left turners turn onto the number one lane. Traffic that wishes to go from the driveway straight across to the opposite side driveway(s) would be prohibited. - 12 - The negative feature of this proposal lies in the eventual merge or lane changing by the vehicles in the number two lane and the newly arrived vehicles in the number one lane. The merge or lane change in order to turn into Ocean Avenue would now occur very close to the intersection of Ocean Avenue. There is presently an uncontrolled marked crosswalk across the west leg of Ocean Avenue. If the merging or lane changing occurs close to the crosswalk there is a potential for disregarding the pedestrian because of the concern for adjacent motor vehicle traffic changing lanes. This is a safety concern that must be considered. In order to provide as much sight and maneuvering room as possible with this scenario, it is recommended that curb parking be prohibited in the vicinity of the crosswalk and the lane changing area on the north side of Aviation Boulevard. This will provide an unobstructed view for both the vehicular traffic and the crossing pedestrians. Enforcement of the ',KEEP CLEAR!' Area: The purpose of the "KEEP CLEAR" is as a warning device and can be ticketed under the vehicle code section 22500(e). Recommendation: Based on the foregoing the following is recommended: - Pursue the potential for signalization of the Pacific Coast Highway driveway with Caltrans. Define the feasibility of same and the type of operation that would be allowed. - To ensure the elimination of potential accident conflict, prohibit the left turn from the shopping center driveway onto Aviation Boulevard. - Restripe the number one eastbound Aviation Boulevard lane from Pacific Coast Highway to the shopping center driveway to provide a separate left turn land into the center - Determine what legal ordinances, resulting, et al are needed to allow the enforcing agency to enforce a "KEEP CLEAR" area. Define the signs, markings, etc necessary to accomplish this - After implementation of the necessary ordinances place "KEEP CLEAR" pavement markings on the eastbound lanes at the subject driveway. Along with this paint, a 6" white stripe between the number one and two lanes on eastbound Aviation Boulevard. Install candlestick type cones on the 6" white stripe; Remove curb parking on the north side of Aviation Boulevard from Ocean Avenue to the subject driveway. - Evaluate the operation for a six month period Respectfully Submitted, Concu NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE Ed Ruzak Ar on Antich City Traffic Engineer pworks/errb Director of Publlic Works 0 Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, 120 SO. SPRING ST. LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 TDD (213) 620-3550 (213) 620-3304 June 27, 1991 Mr. Anthony Antich Director of Public Works City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Tony: RECEIVED JUL 21991 PIT, rr Wf1RK$ f)EpT, 7 -LA -1 21.251 Pacific Coast Hwy. at Alpha Beta Park Driveway (1100 Pacific Coast Highway) YOUR MAY 15, 1991 LETTER REQUESTING CALTRANS TO STUDY THE FEASIBILITY OF SIGNALIZING THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE AT 1100 PCH, THE ENTRANCE TO ALPHA BETA PARK. Caltrans does not perform feasibility studies for highway improvements to benefit adjacent private properties. It has neither the staff nor funding to do so. Such work does not fall within its mandate to provide safe and efficient transportation on State highways. As a matter of policy, Caltrans does not signalize private driveways on State highways. However, occasionally an owner of an adjacent property will desire signal control at a driveway servicing a facility which is a significant traffic generator. In such instances Caltrans will permit the installation of a traffic signal provided the following conditions are met: 1. The proposed traffic signal is warranted in accordance with Chapter 9 of the Caltrans Traffic Manual. 2. The proposed signal will not disrupt two-way progressive movement of traffic on the State highway throughout the day. Mr. Anthony Antich June 27, 1991 Page Two 3. The proposed signal will not otherwise impair safety and operation on the State highway. 4. The proposed signal installation, including interconnection and any other modifications to existing highway facilities required by the installation, are paid for 100 percent by the requesting property owner (permittee). 5. A permanent easement for the purpose of traffic signal maintenance is granted by the permittee. 6. A permit for the work has been approved by Caltrans. The permit application must include a Permit Engineering Evaluation Report, or "PEER",,_ (form DM -M -P-231 (Rev. 10/87)). This usually includes, as an attachment, the permittee's consulting traffic engineer's report. The PEER will include: 1) vicinity map; 2) filled in traffic signal warrant sheets (see Ch. 9, Traffic Manual); 3) directional traffic count flow diagram of current counts at the driveway and any affected adjacent intersections; 4) traffic projections, if new or revised adjacent land use is anticipated; 5) collision diagram and accident summary covering a minimum of 3 most recent years of reported accident history on the highway segment covering 150 feet on both sides of the proposed signal; 6) time -space diagrams for the applicable portion of the existing, signal system within which the proposed signal will operate for all operational plans in effect during the morning and evening peak'periods (6'to 9:30 a.m., and 3 to 7 p.m.); 7) Caltrans -approved plans for the improvement. The PEER will discuss the need for the proposed signal, what it will serve, its approximate cost, both its benefits - and its potential detrimental impacts, how it will affect safety and operation on the State highway, who will maintain the proposed signal (State will maintain and pay energy costs 100 percent), functional adequacy of the total improvement, and all non-standard design features (these will require approval by Headquarters' reviewers). C Mr. Anthony Antich June 27, 1991 Page Three As regards the subject location, in several telephone conversations between my staff and Mr. Roger Bacon, the owner, it has been indicated that Caltrans has no significant objections to the proposed signal. That is, provided it is a half -signal with the sole purpose of providing a protected southbound left -turn move into the driveway, and egress from the driveway is permanently restricted to right turns. It has also been indicated that there potentially exists a conflict between the proposed facility and the likely need to provide additional southbound left -turn vehicle storage for the left turn lane on PCH at Aviation Boulevard. This issue can only be resolved by a traffic study. However, a traffic count conducted in January 1988 shows this southbound PCH left -turn move at Aviation Boulevard was 226 vehicles in the p.m. peak hour. Based upon the existing 120 second p.m. peak period background cycle length, 25 feet of storage per left turning vehicle, a safety factor of 1.5 (low speed facility), it is found that 280 feet of left turning vehicle storage is needed. The existing southbound PCH left -turn lane at Aviation Boulevard is about 225 feet long. Existing available roadway space on the median could provide an additional 35 feet of left -turn lane for 260 feet total. This is somewhat short of what is needed, but would be considered acceptable, provided there has been no significant increase in southbound PCH left -turn demand at Aviation Boulevard. Another question which remains to be settled by a traffic study is whether or not the existing southbound PCH left turn lane at the Alpha Beta Park driveway will be adequate with the proposed signal, in light of anticipated demand. It should be noted that the northbound double left turn lane on PCH at Pier Avenue, based on 1987 traffic data, has insufficient capacity to handle demand, and cannot be shortened to provide additional left -turn storage for the Alpha Beta Park driveway left turn - lane on PCH. It was also indicated to Mr. Bacon that the half -signal under consideration would give a continuous green to southbound through traffic, eliminating the need for the signal to fit into a two-way progression on PCH. Since only northbound through traffic on PCH would be stopped, it will be simple to provide one-way northbound progression. Thus, the proposed half -signal is not anticipated to interfere with two-way progressive movement of traffic on PCH. Mr. Anthony Antich June 27, 1991 Page Four It should be noted that the costs involved for the proposed improvement will include not only the engineering and construction costs, but also permit fees for filing, reviewing and processing the application, and for inspection. Also, the permittee will be expected to post a performance and payment bond. The Permit Branch (telephone (213) 620-2206) should be contacted for specific information related to the permit process. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Karl F. Berger, of my staff, at (213) 620-3829. R. D. GILSTRAP Senior Transportation Engineer Traffic Operations Branch cc: Mr. Roger Bacon Park Pacific Shopping Center 1100 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 PETITION FOR CLOSURE OF STREET INTERSECTION, EIGHTH PLACE EAST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - Mr. Timothy Beck, 723 - 8th Place, presented to the Council a petition signed by fourteen residents, requesting the subject street closure, and this matter was referred to the City Engineer for consideration and response. APPEAL FROM APPROVAL IN CONCEPT OF PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TWO STORY SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING AT 722 EIGHTH PLACE - BEATRICE BUTTERS, PROPERTY OWNER; TIMOTHY A. BECK, 723 EIGHTH PLACE, APPELLANT. Memorandum dated July 11, 1974 from 4 Rod Merl, Environmental Control Officer; letter dated July 3, from Timothy A. Beck; minutes of the Board of Zoning Adjustment meeting, July 1, 1974; letters of protest from eight residents of area; Preliminary Environmental Impact Report No. HB -306. DISCUSSION - Mr. Beck was present to present his testimony opposing approval in concept of the subject environmental report and citing lessening of birds in the area and loss of psychological open space as environmental impacts caused by the proposed development of this property. He proposed that the City purchase the subject lot for development as a tot lot, and presented to the Council a petition signed by 19 residents, requesting reconsideration of the environmental impact. Speaking in favor of the proposed development of a two story single- family dwelling on the subject site were Mrs. Beatrice Butters, owner of said property, Mr. John Cole, 640 - 8th Place, Mrs. Coralie Ebey, 2466 Myrtle Avenue. ACTION - to deny the subject appeal and uphold the action of the Board of Zoning Adjustment taken on July 1, 1974, declaring Environmental Impact Report No. HB -306 adequate and asking that a negative declaration be filed. Motion by Councilwoman Tyson - Second by Mayor Post Carried Ayes: Councilmen Barks, Doerfling, Tyson, Widman, Mayor Post Noes: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR LEFT TURN BAYS OFF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND AVIATION BOULEVARD FOR PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 1100 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - Memorandum dated July 11, 1974 from Rod Merl, Environmental Control Officer; memorandum dated July 2, 1974 from Gerald P. Taylor, City Engineer; memorandum dated July 11, 1974 from park and Recreation Commission; Board of Zoning Adjustment Minutes, meeting of July 1, 1974; Preliminary Environmental Impact Report No. HB -311. DISCUSSION - City Engineer Gary Taylor displayed a map outlining Scheme "C" and quoted from his memorandum stating his opinion that left -turn lanes were warranted at the proposed locations. Rod Merl, Environmental Control Officer, presented a history of the project and its relation to the City. He displayed a drawing shuwing the Spanish motif of the priposed grovery store with adjacent offices and satellite stores and informed the Council that this design had been approved by the Design Review Board, the Environmental Impact Report had been approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustment, and that the Park and Recreation Commission had approved the Preliminary Site Study, Scheme "c", presented by the Roger Bacon Development Company. Mr. Roger Bacon was present and replied to questions from the Council. -3- Minutes 7/16/74 Commercial Development, 1100 Pacific Coast Highway - Request for Left Turn Bays (Continued) ACTION - to approve establishment of a left turn bay and access for southbound traffic on Pacific Coast Highway between Thirteenth Street and Aviation Boulevard allowing left turn access onto Pacific Coast Highway into southbound traffic, subject to approval by the State Division of Highways; to approve a left turn bay and access for east- bound traffic on Aviation Boulevard between Pacific Coast Highway and Aubrey Court allowing left turn access onto Aviation Boulevard into eastbound traffic; and to grant conceptual approval to a Preliminary Site Study, Scheme "C", subject to all conditions imposed by approvals granted by the Board of Zoning Adjustment, the Improvement Commission and the Park and Recreation Commission and to the posting of a bond for the reasonable cost of improvements including a landscaped side- walk, twenty-one public parking spaces adjacent to the Greenwood Park area, pedestrian piers and a sprinkler system, on the north side of Greenwood Park, all to be dedicated to the City, with the aforementioned left turn bays conditioned on the drawing of all required building permits and the substantial completion of said constructions. Motion by Councilman Doerfling - Second by Mayor Post Carried Ayes: Councilmen Barks, Doerfling, Tyson, Widman, Mayor Post Noes: None Absent: None REFUSE COLLECTION - REQUEST FOR RATE INCREASE - Letters dated April 11, June 14 and July 10, 1974 from Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., 14905 S. San Pedro Street, Gardena; memorandum dated July 10, 1974 from Earl Diller, City Manager. DISCUSSION - Mr. Richard Young, Regional vice President of Browning- Ferris Industries of California, Inc., Waste Systems Division, was present and outlined for the Council the extraordinary operating expenses experienced by his company in the last twelve months and the cost of living index increase. ACTION - to grant to Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., Waste Systems Division, a 12% increase in refuse collection fees from $2.00 per unit to $2.25 per unit for residential collection service and a 15% increase in fees for commercial service. Motion by Councilman Doerfling - Second by Councilman Barks Carried Ayes: Councilmen Barks, Doerfling, Tyson, Widman Noes: Mayor Post Absent: None NEWSPAPER RECOVERY PROGRAM - Memorandum dated July 11, 1974 from Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., Waste Systems Division, 14905 S. San Pedro Street, Gardena. DISCUSSION - Mr. Richard Young, Regional Vice President of Browning- Ferris Industries of California, Inc., Waste Systems Division, outlined for the Council a newspaper recovery program which was approved by the Improvement Commission at their meeting on February 7, 1974. ACTION - to approve the initiation as soon as possible of a ninety -day trial newspaper recovery program to be implemented by Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., Waste Systems Division, with this period to be extended for thirty days if necessary, with ten per cent of any revenue derived to be returned to the city; to direct the staff to prepare an appropriate ordinance promoting separation of garbage and protection against scavengers; and to direct the staff and the Police Department to support this program by enforcing Section 14-11 of the City Code prohibiting the removal of the contents of any refuse container by an outside person or agent. Motion by Councilman Doerfling - Second by Mayor Post So ordered. -4- Minutes 7/16/74 December 3, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 10, 1991 AVIATION/OCEAN CROSSWALK SAFETY ISSUES Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve the installation of a flashing yellow beacon for northbound and southbound traffic at the marked uncontrolled crosswalk across Aviation Blvd. at Ocean Drive. The estimated cost of this unbudgeted project is $15,000. If approved it is recommended that an appropriation of $15,000 from the State Gas Tax Fund be made. 2. Place the potential signalization of the subject intersection in the City's five year CIP. 3. Study the further possibility of a raised median for Aviation Blvd. from Prospect to Aubrey Court. Background: At the April 11, 1989 City Council meeting a study of traffic safety along Aviation Blvd. was presented to the Council. A copy of that report is attached. Part of that report addressed channelization and traffic signalization of the intersection of Aviation and Ocean Drive. The proposed changes were to improve safety of the crossing pedestrians as well as improve overall circulation and safety for motorists on Aviation and on Ocean. The cost of signalization was approximately $80,000 to $100,000 and was found to be prohibitive at the time. Red curb installations were installed to improve sight visibility of the crossing. In October 1991, Ms. Julie Vaughn, 950 Aviation, presented the Staff Traffic Safety Committee with a petition for needed safety improvements at the Aviation/Ocean crosswalk. Her letter and petition are attached. Analysis: The installation of a traffic signal is considered the ultimate solution for total control and safety for all users. Cost is still a major consideration in that the $80,000 to $100,000 figure is still realistic. Two other alternatives were discussed at the Traffic Safety Committee meeting. The first involved consideration of placing a raised concrete median along Aviation Blvd. from Prospect to Aubrey Court. This median would allow access control from side street driveways and some cross streets. It would allow pedestrians to cross Aviation in a two stage process rather than having to cross the entire street in one maneuver. The median would act as a storage or refuge point. The disadvantages of this proposal include: 1. A cost to provide the raised median of approximately $25,000 to $60,000 depending on the length of median installed. 2. Removal of all curb parking along Aviation Blvd. and, 3. Limited ability to turn out of driveways and some cross streets. Further study of this alternative is required. Guidance from the City Council is needed as to whether further exploration of this alternative should be attempted. The second alternative studied was the placement of a flashing beacon in advance of the crosswalk. The beacon would be overhead on a mast arm similar to a traffic signal pole so that a clear warning of the upcoming crossing is provided. The cost of this alternative is approximately $15,000. Summary and Conclusion: The cost of signalization of the intersection is a major capital outlay. During next year's budget discussion this project should be considered for placement in the City's five year CIP. Further study of a raised median for Aviation Blvd. should be done to define the costs and ramifications to access and parking along the corridor. A flashing beacon should be considered for placement at the subject intersection. Respectfully submitted, Fes, lliam M. Glickman, Interim ublic Works Director Noted For Fiscal Impact: :(r `elf14A Viki C eland Finance Director Concur: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Attachment: Julie Vaughn letter April 11, 1989 meeting with alternates pworks/ccsrsfty - 3 - City of 21ermosarl3each.) `s� Civic Center. 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Ms. Julie Vaughn Supercuts 950-0 Aviation Boulevard Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 October RECE1VEu OCT 1 5 1991 o411.Te wr' VS DEPT. Dear Ms. Vaughn: We are in receipt of your letter dated October 7, 1991 regarding your concern about a hazardous crosswalk at Ocean Avenue and Aviation Boulevard. Your letter will be copied to the City Council. Your letter has been referred to the Public Works Department and the Traffic Safety Committee for necessary action and response. That department will be contacting you with the results of your inquiry. 2l yuu Trish to chock on tho status, the department's number is 318-0214. We appreciate your input in this matter, and thank you for your interest in improving our community. Sincerely, Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager By • -'ti ,_1 •-Laurie' Duke, Executive Secretary City Manager/City Council cc: City Council Public Works Department Traffic Safety Committee . ' ,, , LP- / t -1 L ._,C:K..-i.., \--Z' k (1_-/CZLX ---'6 7=4"—/ (54T/ J,, , ‘-- (c._,L( 017 1 irL 713,1 ) IL CF:)‘i--7 /I 'U. 01— .„) L24.(, - LI /1Ct'(- (4• ..1 tr_tr -LL Oc lcUJ LCL" Ljj4L), j(.° )-- cur, . aL3At-Tp) OALk/ .attz_cr _ LA)L, LIAL- 6_/:Y4.) RECEIVED OCT 0 9 11/1 CITY Ct. C-Cfati- C. I //' SUPC,iCUTS 950.0 Aviat::In Blvd. fieri Beach, CA 90254 213-374-4011 44/:.• • LuN '2,41 • • Lij \i EL, cie FROM: ED F:lI2 K H__UGIATES, INS.. r t4 '7D4 moi, • April 3, 198T Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting af. the Hermosa Beach City .Council April 11, 1.9aa. AVIATION BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SAFETY REVIEW FOLLGWU" Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 89- , establishing a red Ina on Aviation Boulevard in the vicinity of Owosso Aven:e dnd,Oc0F"m Drive for the provision of improving sight distances at the Ocean Drive crosswalk. Background: A traffic engineering study of Aviation Boulevard was prriparad' and presented to City Council on November 9, 1988. Tl:e Councz approved: 1. prohibiting left turns out of Aubrey Court onto Aviation Boulevard, and 2. directed the issue of red curb back to staff for further analysis. Analysis: This analysis is divided as follows: 1. Introduction 2. Red Curb Analysis a. Where was red curb recommended and why? b. Re -check of Recommended Sight Distances c. Public Works Department Survey d. Affected Businesses e. Installation and Maintenance Cost 3. Other Alternatives Considered a. Petition b. Pedestrian Signal Analysis c. Installation and Maintenance Cost 4. Summary and Conclusion 1. INTRODUCTION A traffic engineering report of Aviation Boulevard frnrs the easterly City limits to Pacific Coast Highway was preear.ed by B4 Ruzak & Associates, Inc. at the request of the Director cf.=.41101.•c Works responding to public concerns of safety on this street.. A copy`of this October 17, 1988 the City Clerk's office. The traffic engineer's report about the following: report is available for review in analyzed and made recommendations 1. Stopping Sight Distance 2. Crosswalk Utilization 3. Traffic Signal Considerations 4. Flashing Beacon Considerations 5. Additional Signing/Pavement Markings 6. Re -striping Aviation Boulevard 7, Other Improvements, i.e., Turn Prohibitions The traffic engineer's recommendations have been installed and are working. City Council directed that staff further analyze installation of red curb in advance of the crosswalk at Ocean Drive. 2. RED CURB ANALYSIS 2a. Where was red curb .recommended and why? Red curb was recommended on the approaches to the Ocean Drive crosswalk to improve sight distances for pedestrians and vehicles. There __ is existing red curb_both__east and west of Ocean Drive.From Ocean Drive to Bonnie Brae the north curb is already painted red. This is shown on Attachment No. 1. 2b. Re -check of Recommended Sight Distances: The traffic engineer's report indicated red curb footages necessary for safe stopping sight distances. These footages were field verified with a temporary installation. 2c. Public Works Department Survey: The.Public Works Department conducted a survey of the adjacent business and property owners in the vicinity of the Ocean Drive crosswalk regarding whether they think the painted crosswalk is needed at Ocean Drive. Forty seven surveys were hand delivered on January 30, 1989. The results are: In Favor Opposed [17] [ 2] Nineteen surveys (40%) were returned. �..r Some respondants said a flashing light or traffic signal is needed. This is discussed further in the report. 2d. Affected Businesses: South side of Aviation Boulevard west of Ocean Drive: Length of proposed additional red curbing: 25 feet Number of On -Street Parking Spaces Lost: 1 space Name: Hermosa Plaza Type: Office Building Years in Operation: 9 years 2 On site required parking per 1989 zoning code: 30 spaces Available on site Parking: 27 spaces North side of Aviation Boulevard east of Ocean Drive: Length of proposed additional red curbing: 46 feet Number of On -Street Parking Spaces Lost: 2 spaces Name: Paul's Rentals Type: Equipment Rental Years in Operation: 40 years On site required parking per 1989 zoning code: 8 spaces Available on site Parking: 7 spaces 2e. Installation and Maintenance Cost: The estimated cost for installing the red curb is $300 for labor and material. The annual maintenance cost is estimated at $100. The work can be done by City crews within the existing appropriation. 3. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 3a. Petition: On Nove:-'er 2, 1988 a petiition regarding the intersection at Aviation Boulevard and Ocean Drive was hand delivered to the Public Works Department. The petition contained 464 signatures expressing concerns regarding what the petitioners feel is a potentially hazardous condition. Their thought is to install a pedestrian signal. 3b. Pedestrian Signal Analysis: Pedestrian signals are found at mid -block - not intersections. At an intersection it must be a traffic signal which is unwarranted at this location. In order to install a traffic signal solely for pedestrians, two alternatives were prepared. See attached drawing for Alternative "A" and Alternative "B". Both drawings show a necessary reconstruction of the intersection. Benefits Non -Benefits - Full pedestrian protection - Pedestrian actuated Note: The November 9, 1988 the Ocean Drive crosswalk. Date/Time of Day Day of Week May 10, 1988 - Tuesday 1030 thru 1300 July 22, 1988 - Friday 1000 thru 1400 - Users of Ocean Drive must find alternate routes - Also requires parking & removal - Possible condemnation of private lands. agenda item counted pedestrian use of # of Pedestrians crossin 20 27 2c. Installation and Maintenance Cost: The estimated construction Cost is between $90,000 and $100,000. Design, inspection and administration could push the cost up to $120,000. Annual, maintenance cost is estimated between 2 and $3,000. 4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The pedestrian signal alternative needs further study and public comment regarding traffic circulation in the immediate area. However, based on this preliminary analysis and cost, this alternate cannot be recommended. Red curb has the lowest cost and improves both pedestrian and driver safety. Based on cost, installation of red curb is recommended. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to City Council are: 1. Consider the pedestrian signal as part of the five-year Cu'. Respectfully submitted, /f/ /ltifThA II Anthony Antich Director of Pu•lic Works Attachments: AA:mv avi/pwadmin Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Resolution No. 89 - Attachment No. 1 Drawing Showing Alternative "A1' & Alternative Ir Bn Alternative "ASI - -I AVIATION BLVD. OCEAN DR. LEGEND TRAFFIC SIGNAL co --0 PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL it l l l 1 l MARKED CROSSWALK Alternative "El" "El" AVIATION BLVD. C> - ISLAND OCEAN DR. OCEAN/AVIATION CHANNELIZATION ALTERNATIVES AVE- EXISTING REI CUR© f R°PosE.DAIo 57-01: NG 14--1' 0- TRAFFIC SIGNAL �-- • STOP SIGN BONNIE BRAE ST. Jog w maial AVE. w r- 6 4 64 OCEAN R. AVIATION BLVD. !OPOSED NO STOPPING PACIFIC COAST - - HWY.. December 4, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Member of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of December 10, 1991 1990-91 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (Including Report from Independent Auditor) Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the 1990-91 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), which includes the report from Coopers and Lybrand, our independent auditors. Background Annually the City has a financial audit performed by an independent certified public accounting firm. The City Council awarded the contract for audit services to Coopers and Lybrand in May 1990 to begin with the 1989-90 fiscal year audit; completion of the 1990-91 audit fulfills the second year of the three year contract. This is the third year that the more comprehensive report has been prepared in accordance with guidelines provided by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and all applicable accounting standards. Last year, for the first time, the City's report received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the GFOA. The City also received the the Certificate of Award for Outstanding Financial Reporting from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) for the second time. The award programs require a high level of compliance with governmental standards and inclusion of information well beyond the general purpose financial statements. The 1990-91 CAFR has again been submitted to both of the associations for participation in the award programs since the awards are valid for one year only. Analysis The auditor's report is on page 1 behind the second divider labeled "Financial Section". The City received an unqualified opinion for the fourth time. An unqualified opinion indicates that the auditor believes the financial statements present a fair picture of the financial position of the City, as opposed to a qualified opinion, in which the auditor "qualifies" or limits his opinion for specific reasons, such as lack of fixed asset accounting or significant internal control deficiencies. Only CAFRs with unqualified opinions are reviewed for the award programs mentioned above. The following analysis deals with the General Fund, which is the main operating fund of the City. Additional analysis of all governmental funds is included in the Transmittal Letter on page vii at the front of the CAFR. General Fund Revenue Revenue received in the General Fund was 1.22% less than budget and 6.87% less than revenue received in 1989-90. Adjusting for non-recurring revenue from the sale of surplus lots (Miscellaneous category), which skewed the previous year, revenue actually increased by 5.24% over last year. General Fund Inc/Dec Percent Percent 1990-91 Over 89-90 Inc/Dec of Total Property Taxes $3,014,162 $248,355 8.98% 35.25% Sales Tax 1,669,700 (88,706) -5.04% 19.53% Other Tax 1,459,338 99,688 7.33% 17.07% Licenses and Permits 272,944 (17,136) -5.91% 3.19% Fines and Forfeitures 235,604 65,548 38.54% 2.76% Use of Money and Property 252,515 (9,617) -3.67% 2.95% Intergovern- mental Revenue 844,380 (17,308) -2.01% 9.88% Charges For Services 460,617 88,677 23.84% 5.39% Miscellaneous 100,071 (995,445) -90.87% 1.17% Interest 241,130 (4,785) -1.95% 2.82% Total $8,550,461 ($630,729) -6.87% 100.00% Property and sales tax comprise 55% of General Fund revenue. Secured and unsecured property tax increased by 9% and 13%, respectively, making property tax the City's most stable source of income, even in a declining real estate market. Transfer tax (the tax on property turnovers) declined by 28%; the number of turnovers declined by 17%. Sales tax receipts declined 5% from last year. Since sales tax comprises approximately 20% of General Fund revenue, we must be sensitive to the fact that loss of business without the same level of tax -generating replacements will likely necessitate budget adjustments. The Other Tax category is up 7%, due primarily to an increase in Transient Occupancy Tax from the addition of Hotel Hermosa in August of 1990. Another notable increase is the 24% increase in Charges for Services, which is attributable to plan check fees for the Strand Hotel and the update of user fees adopted by City Council last year. General Fund Expenditures Expenditures Inc/Dec Percent Percent 1990-91 Over 89-90 Inc/Dec Of Total Current: Legislative/ Legal $ 343,608 ($ 16,992) -4.71% 3.41% General Government 2,248,365 129,780 6.13% 22.29% Public Safety 4,684,990 308,268 7.04% 46.44% Community Development 561,823 56,063 11.08% 5.57% Culture/ Recreation 662,225 (23,222) -3.39% 6.56% Public Works 1,026,477 64,205 6.67% 10.17% Sanitation 324,234 25,852 8.66% 3.21% Debt Service: Principal 35,729 (22,957) -39.12% 0.35% Interest 216,327 (44,283) -16.99% 2.14% Capital Outlay (15,275) (470,744) -103.35% -0.15% Total $10,008,503 $ 5,970 0.06% 100.00% General Fund expenditures were 6% under budget and less than 1% higher than last year. Adjusting the prior year for capital improvements, which are now shown in the Capital Improvement Fund, to make the years comparable, expenditures actually were 4.79% higher than 1989-90. The largest category of expenditure, Public Safety (46.44%), increased by 7.04%. The General Government category, which includes insurance and retirement benefits for employees, increased by 6.13%. The largest percentage increase (11.08%) occurred in the Community Development category due to purchase of a new department vehicle and plan checking fees for the Strand Hotel. General Fund, Fund Balance The ending fund balance in the General Fund increased by 7% over last year, primarily due to expenditures coming in under budget. $1.8 million of the $2.7 million fund balance is designated for specific purposes (see page 35 of the CAFR). Some of the additional funds are being used to balance the 1991-92 budget as revised by the City Council in June, 1991. The City will be conducting Midyear Budget Review soon and typically evaluates the fund balance at that time. Any surplus funds could be added to amounts designated for capital improvements or contingencies. The City has managed to maintain the Contingency account, which is our "rainy day" fund for emergencies/economic uncertainties at the same balance as last year of $469,159. It is important to increase this account when possible since it serves as a hedge against the economy. Summary In 1990-91, the City managed to reduce expenditures to meet revenue shortfalls. With revisions to the 1991-92 budget, the City used a combination of revenue increases, expenditure reductions and use of carryover funds to offset the budget shortfall - without reducing service levels and still maintaining reasonable reserves. In a declining economy, it will be increasingly more difficult to maintain the desired level of service. Midyear Budget Review is just around the corner and will provide the next opportunity to review our financial picture. Natalie LaBran, the manager of our audit, will be present at the meeting. Concur: Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager Viki Copeland Finance Director December 3, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council December 10, 1991 Recommendation: It STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH CIP 90-144 is recommended that City Council: Approve the complete removal and replacement of the Strand bikeway and pedestrian path along with its protection wall the repair method for this project between: a. the south City Limit and Eighth Street. b. Eight Street and Fifteenth Street (wall only) Fiftenth Street and T nty-fourth Street. Approve the repair of the bikeway on Hermosa Avenue between Twenty-fourth Street and the north City Limit as follows: as Design a new alignment for the bikeway to connect the existing Manhattan Beach bikeway with the existing Hermosa Beach bikeway at the north City Limit of Hermosa Beach. Design the widening and striping of 24th St. (between the Strand and Hermosa Ave.) to accommodate two-way bicycle traffic. c. Design the asphalt overlay on the Hermosa Avenue bikeway between 24th St. and the north City Limit. 3. Authorize staff to prepare plans and specifications in accordance with the above recommendations. Background: The Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path pavement (installed in 1953 and 1954) and the Strand wall (installed in the 1940's) are currently in a state of disrepair and require corrective action. Funding has -become available to accomplish these needed repairs and the analysis of this report explores the following alternative methods of repair. The financial implications of each method are also provided. The alternative methods for the Strand areas are: 1. "pick and patch" spot repairs 2. remove and replace between specified stations 3. remove and replace, complete. - 1 - { FUNDING ACTIVITIES On August 23, 1988, Council adopted Resolution No. 88-5179 (Attached as Appendix - Exhibit A); approving the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path application for Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Funds. On August 8, 1989, Council adopted Resolution No. 89-5300 (Attached as Appendix - Exhibit B); approving the application for bikeway and/or pedestrian path funds under SB 821 and approving the adoption of its bikeway and/or pedestrian path plan. On August 14, 1990, Council adopted Resolution No. 90-5399 (Attached as Appendix - Exhibit C); adopted the Final Circulation, Transportation and Parking Element of the General Plan which designated the bicycle route on the Strand from the south City Limit to 24th Street and the west side of Hermosa Avenue from 24th Street to the north City Limit. On October 9, 1990, Council adopted Resolution No.90-5413 (Attached as Appendix - Exhibit D); approving the application for Regional Funds for the reconstruction of the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path. The total amount of all the grant funds equals $1,080,876. On March 4, 1991, a check in the amount of $405,656 was received by the City of Hermosa Beach from the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC). This grant, when added to the $451,568 already received and $223,652 projected for next year, will all be used to repair the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path. LACTC, under Article 3 of the TDA (SB 821) had distributed these funds to the City of Hermosa Beach for use on the following activities related to pedestrian and bicycle facilities - (including sidewalk wheelchair ramps): - Preliminary engineering leading to construction - Right-of-way acquisition - Construction and reconstruction - Repair and maintenance (of -f -street bikeways only); and,.-_ - Purchase and installation of features such as bike parking racks, benches, drinking fountains and changing rooms. Analysis and Conclusions: A complete report analyzing the three alternative methods of repair for the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path is attached. Staff has completed a condition inventory of the entire Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path pavement and the Strand protection wall within the City boundaries. The TDA Article 3 funds above are available only for the "bicycle path", i.e. segments 1 through 5 in the attached report. This is the Strand from the south City Limit to 24th Street and the west side of Hermosa Avenue from 24th Street to the north City Limit. The Strand from 24th Street to the north City Limit is not eligible for TDA Article 3 funds. Staff recommends the complete removal and replacement of the Strand pavement and protection wall. This is the best solution for the needed repairs considering long term economics, aesthetics, liability and maintenance. The alternative Strand repair method number 3, is to completely remove and replace the existing facilities. The cost for this repair method ranges from $1,010,000 to $1,546,000 for the bikeway. TDA Article 3 funds available for the bikeway are $1,080,876. Alternatives: Other alternatives considered by staff and available to the City Council are: 1. Select a different repair method such as "pick and patch" or remove and replace between specified stations. (This could result in higher net costs over the life of the Strand Bikeway and Pedestrian Path.) 2. Solicit proposals for a design build method of construction on this project, i.e. the same contractor would both design and construct the project. (This would result in no control over the design and higher construction costs.) 3. Change the scope of work (This is not recommended but may be required after the plans and specifications have been prepared and the final cost estimate has been made.) 4. Include the Strand pedestrian path and protection wall from 24th Street to the north City Limit. (This segment is not eligible for County funds and would have to be paid with City funds. Currently, there is no identified funding source and the estimated additional cost is between $268,000 and $409,000.) Respectfully submitted, Brian Gengler Assistant Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Cope and Director of Finance pworks/sansew Concur: Lynn A Terry Deputy City Engineer Liam Glicklan, Interim D rector of Public Works Sieve Wisniewski Interim City Manager - 3 - STRAND BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN PATH CIP 90-144 A REPORT ON THE ANALYSIS OF 3 REPAIR ALTERNATIVES r TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Circulation Element of the General Plan 2 3. Condition Inventory Summary 3 4. Strand Pavement Reconstruction Alternatives 5 5. Strand Wall Reconstruction Alternatives 11 6. Construction Alternatives 15 7. Cost Summary 17 8. Fiscal Impact 18 9. .Conclusions 19 10.•Appendix 20 i • 1. INTRODUCTION The Hermosa Beach "Strand" consists of a concrete path approximately 20 feet wide for bicycle and pedestrian traffic. A concrete block wall 32 inches tall is along the west side of the pavement perimeter. The Strand runs along the length of the beach and is approximately 1.8 miles in length. Both the Strand pavement ( installed in 1953 and 1954) and the Strand wall (installed in the 1940's) are currently in a state of disrepair. (See Existing Condition Photographs in Appendix - Exhibit F). The purpose of this report is to analyze the Strand existing conditions as well as to evaluate repair alternatives available within the constraints of the available funding. The Strand consists of the bicycle path and the non -bicycle path (see Bicycle Route Map: Appendix - Exhibit F).' Available funds may only be used for the bicycle path. For this reason, our evaluation of the Strand is divided into the following segments: Segment # Location From To 1 Strand So. City boundary 8th St. 2 Strand -8th-St. 15th St. 3 Strand 15th St. 24th St. 4 24th St. Strand Hermosa Ave. 5 Hermosa Ave. 24th St. No. City boundary 6 Strand 24th St. No. City boundary Segments 1 through 5 represent the bike path. Segment 6 represents the non -bike path. Segment 2 was reconstructed in the mid 1980's, and for that reason is considered a separate segment. Note: In the interest of brevity, the Strand bikeway and pedestrian path will henceforth be called "pavement"; the Strand wall will be - called "wall". t 2. CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN On August 14, 1990, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-5399 (See Appendix - Exhibit D) adopting the final circulation, transportation and parking element. The element was prepared by DKS Associates and Figure 13 of the element identifies the location of the designated bike route in Hermosa Beach. Reconstruction work along the bikeway is consistent with the circulation element. The overall goal of the element is to provide a balanced transportation system for the safe and efficient transport of people and goods consistent with the goals of the land use element. The following are implementation statements found in the circulation element: Implementation Policy 1.7 Encourage and facilitate pedestrian and bicycle travel City-wide. Implementation Policy 1.8 Provide for the transport of bicycles on public transit vehicles (both fixed route and paratransit) wherever possible. Implementation Policy 1.9 Maintain the surfaces of bikeways and pedestrian ways to maximize safety and ease of travel. Implementation Policy 4.8 Maintain paved surfaces on all public roadways throughout the City to a level which will assure safe and efficient traffic flow. 3. CONDITION INVENTORY SUMMARY Staff has conducted a condition survey of the pavement and wall along the Strand within the City Limits. The results of this inventory are as follows: A. Strand Pavement 1. Bikeway Approximately 68% of the pavement between the south City Limit and 24th Street (excluding the pavement between 8th and 15th Streets) is in need of repair or replacement. 2. Non -Bikeway Approximately 96% of the pavement between 24th Street and the north City Limit is in need of repair or replacement. B. Strand Wall 1. Bikeway Approximately 59% of the wall between the south City Limit and 24th Street is in need of repair or replacement. 2. Non -bikeway Approximately 91% of the wall between 24th Street and the north City Limit is in need of repair or replacement. A complete condition inventory of the above summary may be found in the Appendix - Exhibit G. Regardless of the repair alternative chosen, segments 4 and 5 will be evaluated as noted below. Segment 4. 24th Street between the Strand and Hermosa Avenue. This segment of 24th St. is currently signed for one-way traffic, eastbound. Currently, however, southbound Hermosa Avenue bicycle traffic turns right onto 24th St. westbound, facing traffic to get to the Strand bikeway. (See photo #11; Appendix, Exhibit A) It is recommended that this segment of 24th St. be widened to accommodate two lanes (one eastbound; one westbound) of bicycle traffic. The estimated cost of this construction (including design, inspection and contingencies) is approximately $25,000. This cost estimate' will be used regardless of the repair alternative chosen. Segment 5: Hermosa Avenue between 24th Street and the north City Limit This segment of the bikeway will require the following: A) Realignment of the Hermosa Beach bikeway with the bikeway in Manhattan Beach (See -Photo -#12; Appendix - Exhibit E) The estimated cost of construction (including design, inspection and contingencies) is approximately $25,000. B. Asphalt overlay of the Hermosa Avenue bikeway, between 24th Street and the north boundary. The estimated cost of construction is approximately $30,000. This cost estimate total of approximately $55,000 will be used regardless of the repair alternative chosen. 4. STRAND PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVES Strand Pavement Reconstruction Alternative I: Remove and replace damaged portions as required ("pick and patch"). A. Advantages 1. Cost: This alternative would result in the lowest immediate repair cost for construction. Additionally, inspection costs may be less, and design costs possibly unnecessary. B. Disadvantages 1. No Aesthetic Uniformity: The finished surface would have a "patch work" appearance, rather than a uniform surface. 2. Limited Architectural Flexibility: Because of the non-uniform surface, architectural treatments of the new surface, such as concrete finish, texture, color, patterning, etc. would be very limited aesthetically. 3. Differential Settlement and Increased Maintenance: Most concrete pavement surface deficiencies occur when a new concrete pavement is poured next to against an existing pavement. Because it is much more difficult to achieve required compaction in a small area, the two areas often react independently of each other in terms of settling; resulting in surface depressions or cracking and chipping at common joints. This was observed by staff at most of the existing concrete pavement repairs and nearly all the utility trenches. (See existing condition photographs in Appendix - Exhibit E) Surface discontinuities may result in a potential tripping hazard, increased maintenance and increased liability. 4. Increased Potential for Liability. As mentioned above, differential settlement can cause uneveness in the .pavement. The lack of a smooth surface increases the risk of an accident. 5. Greatest Net Construction Cost (over the life of the system): "Spot" concrete repairs require a relatively expensive saw -cutting operation so that new pavement can be constructed to match the existing pavement. The more economical construction method would be a comprehensive one-time remove and replace, rather than isolated spot repairs that require saw -cutting and multiple "set-up" costs over the years as needed during the life of the pavement. C. Estimated Cost The estimated costs of "pick and patch" pavement repairs are as follows: PAVEMENT ALTERNATIVE I COST 1 SEGMENT NUMBER ITEM 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Design 600 300 1,000 500 800 1,000 Demolition 26,400 8,500 84,000 1,000 200 130,000 Construction 13,000 4,000 45,000 20,000 47,000 68,000 Inspection 1,300 400 2,300 1,000 2,000 3,500 Subtotal 41,300 13,200 132,300 22,500 50,000 202,500 Contingency 4,130 1,320 13,200 2,500 5,000 20,250 Total 45,430 14,520--.145,500 25,000 55,000 222,750 Estimated Pavement Costs Total Bikeway (Segments 1,2,3, 4 & 5) $285,450 Non -Bikeway (Segment 6) Estimated Pavement Costs: $222,750 is Strand Pavement Reconstruction Alternative II: Remove and Replace (full -width) Between Specified Stations A. Advantages 1. Partial Aesthetic Uniformity: This alternative will provide a more uniform appearance than Alternative I ("pick and patch" repairs), but less than Alternative III (total replacement). 2. Differential Settlement, Maintenance, Liability and Net Construction Cost: These factors, as previously explained, will be less when compared with Alternative I, but are still considered a disadvantage when compared with Alternative III. 3. Lower Cost: This alternative should'result in a lower immediate cost than Alternative III but a greater cost than Alternative I. However certain contractors have indicated that even if they submitted a bid for spot repairs; they would provide full width removal and replacement, as it would be more cost effective for them. In this case, the cost to the City would be the same whether spot or full width repairs were desired. - B. Disadvantages 1. The factors mentioned above, which are considered to be advantageous when compared with Alternative I, are considered. to be disadvantageous when compared with Alternative III. 2. Limited Architectural Flexibility: Unless the selected repair areas were rather large in size, it would not be practical to employ architectural treatments. - C. Estimated Cost The estimated cost of this alternative lies between that of Alternative I and Alternative III and is approximated as follows: PAVEMENT ALTERNATIVE II COST SEGMENT NUMBER ITEM 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Design 800 500 1,000 500 800 2,000 Demolition 50,200 10,500 116,000 1,000 200 124,000 Construction 56,000 12,000 129,000 20,000 47,000 139,000 Inspection 5,600 1,200 12,900 1,000 2,000 13,900 Subtotal 112,600 24,200 258,900 22,500 50,000 278,900 Contingency 11,260 2,420 25,890 2,500 5,000 27,890 Total'' 123,860 26,620 284,790 25,000 55,000 306,790 Estimated pavement Cost Total Bikeway (Segments 1,2,3,4, & 5) $515,270 Non -Bikeway (Segment 6) $306,790 Strand Pavement Reconstruction Alternative III: Total Replacement (except between 8th and 15th Street). A. Advantages 1. Aesthetic Uniformity: This alternative is the most aesthetically pleasing, since it will provide the Strand with a uniform appearance. 2. Architectural Flexibility: This alternative is the only alternative that would allow complete flexibility regarding architectural treatment of the new concrete (finish, texture, color, patterning, etc.). 3. Lower Maintenance and No Differential Settling. 4. Lowest Liability. 5. Lowest Net Construction Cost (over the life of the system). B. Disadvantages 1. Cost: This alternative would result in the largest immediate construction cost. C. Estimated Cost The estimated cost of the total pavement reconstruction is approximated as follows: PAVEMENT ALTERNATIVE III COST ITEM I 1 SEGMENT NUMBER 2* 3 4 5 6 Design 1,500 1,000 800 500 1,000 20,000 1,000 Demolition 47,500 40,000 48,200 Construction 130,000 109,000 130,000 Inspection 13,000 10,900 13,000 Subtotal 222,000 160,900 192,000 Contingency 22,200 16,090 19,200 Total 244,200 176,990 211,200 800 1,000 200 52,000 47,000 137,000 2,000 13,700 22,500 50,000 203,700 2,500 5,000 20,370 25,000 55,000 224,070 * Segment 2 is not recommended for Estimated Pavement Costs Total Bikeway (Segments 1,3,4,5,) replacement. $535,400 Non -Bikeway (Segment 6) $224,070 The American Association of Cost Engineers has developed levels of accuracy for construction estimates applied to various levels of engineering work as follows: LEVEL OF ESTIMATE ACCURACY TYPE OF PROJECT Reconnaissance Grade Estimate -30%, +50% Master plan, feasibility study Budget Estimate -15%, +30% Definitive Estimate -5%, +15% Pre -design report Detailed construction cost estimate based on 95-100% complete contract documents Because this is a pre -design report, we can apply accuracy factors of -15%, +30% to our estimates for a comparison of the total estimated bikeway pavement repairs as follows: Bikeway Pavement Repairs Est. Cost/Design Const. Inspect. Cont. Range( -15%, +30%) 1. Spot repairs $285,450 2. Repairs between specific stations $515,270 243,000 - 371,000 438,000 - 670,000 3. Remove & replace concrete complete $535,400 455,000 - 696,000 Similarly, the cost summary comparison for the non -bikeway pavement repairs is as follows: Non -bikeway Pavement Repairs Est. Cost (Design, Const., Inspect., Cont.) Range (-15%, +30%) 1. Spot repairs 2.Repair between specific stations 3.Remove and replace concrete $222,750 $306,790 $224,070 $189,000-$290,000 $261,000-$399,000 $190,000-$291,000 5. STRAND WALL RECONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVES The condition inventory of the Strand wall has revealed that the majority of the deficiencies result from the oxidation (rusting) of the reinforcing steel in the top block of the wall. The oxidation causes the diameter of the steel to increase in size, which cracks the concrete block, causing a structural failure. Previous patch, and spot repairs offer only a band-aid solution. The inevitable failure still occurs. Additionally, the existing wall design is such that the wall is actually supported on the pavement. Thus, the weight of the wall deflects approximately the westerly 5' of the pavement causing stress and cracking in the pavement. (See Photograph #7; Appendix - Exhibit E). If the wall were replaced, it should be constructed independently of the pavement or in a manner that takes into account the anticipated stresses. The comparison of the Strand wall repair alternatives (and the advantages and disadvantages of each) are primarily the same as for the pavement repair. For the same reasons, staff recommends a total reconstruction of the wall. There are two additional benefits to a total replacement of the wall noted below: 1. Complete wall replacement would allow the designer to relocate the light poles and possibly the concrete aggregate trash barrels integrally with the wall. This would decrease the difficulty of sweeping the pavement and would reduce the amount of rubbish that collects there. (The estimated cost to relocate these light poles could range between $80,000 to $150,000, depending on whether or not the existing standards were salvaged). 2. Replacement of the wall separate from the pavement will better preserve the integrity of the pavement itself, whether the pavement is totally reconstructed, or partially reconstructed (pick and patch method). Following is a cost comparison summary for the wall --replacement alternatives. Alternative I: Wall Spot Repairs COST I SEGMENT NUMBER ITEM 1 2 3 4 5 6 Design 300 600 1,000 N/A N/A 1,000 Demo. & Construction 5,700 16,400 27,000 N/A N/A 23,000 Inspection 600 1,700 2,800 N/A N/A 2,400 Subtotal 6,600 18,700 30,800 N/A N/A 26,400 Contingency 660 1,870 3,080 N/A N/A 2,640 Total 7,260 20,570 33,880 N/A N/A 29,040 Wall Estimated Costs Total Bikeway (Segments 1,2,3) Non -Bikeway (Segment 6) $61,710 $29,040 Alternative II: Remove & Replace Wall Between Specified Sections COST I SEGMENT NUMBER ITEM I 1 2 3 4 5 6 Design 500 1,200 2,000 N/A N/A 2,000 Demo. & Construction 13,500 30,800 59,000 N/A N/A 61,000 Inspection 1,400 3,200 6,100 N/A N/A 6,300 Subtotal 15,400 35,200 67,100 N/A N/A 69,300 Contingency 1,540 3,520 6,710 N/A N/A 6,930 Total 16,940 38,720 73,810 N/A N/A 76,230 Wall Estimated Costs Total Bikeway (Segments 1,2,3) $129,470 Non -Bikeway (Segment 6) $76,230 Alternative III: Remove and Replace Wall Complete COST I SEGMENT NUMBER ITEM I 1 2 3 4 5 6 Design 1,500 1,000 2,000 N/A N/A 1,000 Demo. & Construction 93,000 66,000 140,000 N/A N/A 88,000 Inspection 9,100 6,700 14,200 N/A N/A 8,900 Subtotal 103,600 73,700 156,200 N/A N/A 97,900 Contingency 10,360 7,370 15,620 N/A N/A 9,790 Total 113,960 81,070 171,820 N/A N/A 107,690 Wall Estimated Costs Total Bikeway (Segments 1,2,3) Non -Bikeway (Segment 6) $366,850 $107,690 - A comparison of the alternatives for the Strand wall repairs along the bikeway segments is presented below. This comparison includes the costs of design, (if applicable), demolition, construction, inspection and contingencies, in addition to fees for new, relocated light standards and trash receptacles, with the applicable range factor: Strand Wall Repairs Along the Bikeway Cost to Re- Total Range (Segments locate lights (-15% 1,2,3) & trash bins +30%) integral w/wall Spot Repairs $61,710 N/A $61,710 $52,000-$80,000 Repairs between specific stations 129,470 N/A $76,230 $65,000-$99,000 Remove & replace complete 366,850 110,000 $476,850 $405,000-620,000 A comparison of the alternatives for the non -bikeway segment is as follows: Strand Wall Repairs Along the Non -Bikeway Alternative Relocated lights & Segment 6 trash bins Total integral w/wall Range -15%, +30%I 1 Spot Repairs $29,040 Repairs between specific stations $76,230 Remove & replace complete $107,690 N/A N/A $40,000 $29,040 $76,230 $25,000-$38,000 $65,000-$99,000 $147,690 $126,000-192,000 An additional alternative exists for repair of the existing concrete block wall: that of sealing the existing cracks and holes with an epoxy filler, then coating the entire existing wall with an acrylic based cement coat. The estimated cost of this alternative is a relatively low cost of approximately $50,000 for the bikeway and $20,000 for the non -bikeway. However, based on prior unsuccessful experience with this technique, staff has not considered this method as an alternative. 6. CONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVES A. Strand Pavement Construction of a new pavement would require preparation of plans and specifications. Staff has endeavored to acquire the original construction documents from the County of Los Angeles, but has not been successful. Various architectural treatments, textures, patterns and colors have been reviewed for the pavement, but are not recommended. Staff recommends a poured concrete slab with no architectural treatments for the following reasons. 1. SAFETY A smooth surface is required to ensure the safest travel for bicyclists, skaters and pedestrians. Stamped or textured concrete does not meet this requirement. 2. MAINTENANCE Stamped, textured or colored concrete, when replaced, is difficult to match to the original pavement. The stamped concrete in the Strand pavement between 8th Street and 15th Street has been chipped by skateboards and roller skates. Staff does not recommend installing any additional stamped concrete because of the maintenance problems. 3. COST Architectural treatments result in higher costs to the City for the pavement. B. Strand Wall Reconstruction of the wall will be by one of the three following feasible alternatives: 1. Traditional Masonry Block 2. Pre -cast Concrete Panels 3. Cast -In -Place Concrete Panels 1. Traditional Masonry Block a. Advantages may include cost, and the ability to salvage a good deal of the existing wall and use masonry block to repair the existing system. b. Disadvantages may include aesthetic considerations, less durability, and inability to include lighting standards and trash receptacles integral with the wall design. 2. Pre -cast Concrete Panels :a. Advantages may include --cost (if construction cost comparable with concrete block), durability and flexibility of design (to include light standards and/or trash receptacles). Additionally, concrete panels afford a wide variety of architectural treatments (patterns, texture, etc.) at a minimal cost. (See photos in Appendix -Exhibit E). b. Disadvantages may include the inability to employ panels as a means to repair the existing concrete block system. 3. Cast -In -Place Concrete Panels a. Advantages are the same as for Pre -cast Concrete Panels, above, except for an additional advantage: The Cast -In -Place wall would be more resistant to corrosion, since there would be no joint between the footing and the wall. b. Disadvantages are the same as for the Pre -cast Concrete panels, above. Estimated Costs Each of the methods claim theirs is the more durable and economical method. Estimated costs (including design, demolition and construction are approximately $35/LF). 7. COST SUMMARY Below is a summary of the proposed repair alternatives and their cost comparisons. A. BIKEWAY PAVEMENT WALL TOTAL Spot Repairs $243,000-371,000 Repairs between specific stations $438,000-670,000 52,000-80,000 295,000-451,000 65,000-99,000 503,000-769,000 850,000-1,316,000 Remove & replace complete $455,0000-696,000 405,000-620,000 B. NON -BIKEWAY PAVEMENT WALL TOTAL Spot Repairs $189,000-290,000 25,000-38,000 Repairs between specific stations $261,000-399,000 65,000-99,000 Remove & replace complete $190,000-291,000 126,000-192,000 214,000-328,000 326,000-498,000 316,000-483,000 8. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact at this time. However, if staff recommendations are implemented, the following fiscal impact may result. Bikeway Repairs 1. Removal and Replacement of Strand Pavement & Wall. 2. Lighting and trash receptacle re -location. 3. Realignment and connection of Bikeway to City of Manhattan Beach. 4. Widening and re -striping of 24th St. (between Strand and Hermosa Avenue) 5. Overlay of Hermosa Avenue bike Path between 24th St. and north City border. Total Estimated Costs: $ 850,000 - $1,316,000 Estimated Funds Available: $1,080,876 Staff does not recommend the allocation of additional City funds for bikeway repairs until after the bids are received. Staff feels that the Estimated Costs presented in this report are conservative, and, given today's economic bidding climate, it is probable that the bids will fallwithin the funds available. Non -Bikeway Repairs 1. Removal and Replacement of Strand Pavement and Wall. 2. Lighting and Trash Receptacle re -location. Total Estimated Costs: $316,000 - $483,000 Estimated Funds Available: $ -0- Staff recommends that $150,000 be budgeted for each of the next three fiscal years, to accomplish the non -bikeway repairs. At the end of that time, the funds to accomplish the needed construction would then be available. 9. CONCLUSIONS 1. Complete removal and replacement is the best solution for the repairs to both The Strand pavement and wall, in terms of long term economics, aesthetics, liability and maintenance. 2. To obtain the best project at the most competitive price, staff recommends preparing plans and specifications for the following: a) Removal and replacement of the Strand pavement. b) Removal and replacement of the Strand wall. c) Realignment and construction to connect the Manhattan Beach bikeway with the bikeway in Hermosa Beach. d) Widening and striping of 24th St. (between Strand and Hermosa Ave.) to accommodate two-way bicycle traffic. e) Asphalt overlay of the Hermosa Avenue bikeway between 24th St. and the north City border. 3. Staff does not recommend additional allocation of funds to accomplish the bikeway repairs at this time. 4. Staff recommends that $150,000 be budgeted to CIP 90-144 for each of the next three fiscal years to accomplish the non -bikeway repairs. 10. APPENDIX Resolution No. 88-5179 Resolution No. 89-5300 Resolution No. 90-5339 Resolution No. 90-5413 Photographs of Existing Conditions on Strand Bicycle Route Map Condition Inventory Photographs of Sample Architectural Treatments for Wall pworks/bikepath Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit 'E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H 1 2 3 4 5 6 i 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 231 24, 25 26 27 28 APPENDIX — EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 88- 5179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUNDS UNDER SB 821 AND APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF ITS BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN PLAN. WHEREAS, SB 821 provides that 2% of each county's total local transportation fund be annually set aside and used to fund the development of bicycle and pedestrian facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has planned a bikeway system in conformance with specifications of Caltrans' Planning and Design Criteria for Bikways in California and the Regional Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach desires to construct the master bikeway system within their City utilizing the funds available under SB 821. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. To adopt the Bikeway System in conformance with the specifications of Caltrans' Planning and Design Criteria_for Bikeways in California and the Regional Transportation Plan. SECTION 2. To authorize the Director of Public Works, or his designee, as the City's authorized signature and designated contact person; SECTION 3. To apply for all funds available to the City of Hermosa Beach allocated for Bikeways and Pedestrian facilities (SB 821). PASSED, APP d AD TED this 23rd day of August 1988. `-- ESIDENT of t City Cduncil and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, Califor APPROVED AS • FO Y A TON 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPENDIX - EXHIBIT B RESOLUTION NO. 89-5300 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUNDS UNDER SB 821 AND APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF ITS BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN PLAN. WHEREAS, SB 821 provides that 2% of each county's total local transportation fund be annually set aside and used to fund the development of bicycle and pedestrian facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach has planned a bikeway system in conformance with specifications of Caltrans' Planning and Design Criteria for Bikeways in California and the Regional Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach desires to construct the master bikeway system within their City utilizing the funds available under SB 821. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. To adopt the Bikeway System in conformance with the specifications of Caltrans' Planning and Design Criteria for Bikeways in California and the Regional Transportation Plan. SECTION 2. To authorize the City Manager, or his designee, as the City's authorized signature and designated contact person. SECTION 3. To apply for all funds available to the City of Hermosa Beach allocated for Bikeways and Pedestrian facilities (SB 821). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 89-5300 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOTED this 8th day of August 1989 J /7 i, a PRESIDENT of'�theCi y Council aMAYOR of the City of V ATTEST: C4ty Clerk Hermosa Beach, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4d4 City Attorney � �a`QP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPENDIX - EXHIBIT C RESOLUTION NO. 90- 5399 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL CIRCULATION, TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING ELEMENT AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on July 10, 1990 to receive oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The said document is a state mandated General Plan Element; 3. The document revises the current Circulation Element; C. The document is consistent with the General Plan; D. Adoption of the document as the official Circulation Element of the General Plan will not directly or indirectly cause any significant environmental impacts; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby adopts an Environmental Negative Declaration and the final Circulation, Transportation and Parking Element of the General Plan prepared by DKS Associates, dated March, 1990. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED. tIj s tome 14th day of August 1990. PRESIDENTcof the City/ Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: plandoc/ccrscirc CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPENDIX - EXHIBIT D RESOLUTION NO. 90- 5413 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR REGIONAL FUNDS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STRAND/PEDESTRIAN BIKEWAY WHEREAS, $1,748,092 of TDA Article 3 funds will be available for a bikeway and pedestrian project of regional significance; and WHEREAS, these regional funds will be allocated at the discretion of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission for new facility construction, major reconstruction, or for off-street bikeway maintenance; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach desires to reconstruct the surface of the bikeway system on the Strand, and to reconstruct the Strand wall adjacent to the bikeway within their City utilizing the funds available under SB 821. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. To adopt the Bikeway System in conformance with the specifications of Caltrans' Planning and Design Criteria for Bikeways in California and the Regional Transportation Plan. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1.1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. To apply for all funds available to the City of Hermosa Beach allocated for Bikeways and Pedestrian facilities (SB 821). SECTION 3. To authorize the City Manager or his designee, to execute required documents and to be designated contact person for the application of said funds. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of October 1990. PRESIDENT of the CitCounciI an MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: dhs :dtyk� ty/resopath APPROVED AS TO FORM: KCL 0'2e City Attorney co M a g W 0 0 E-1 H H O MI M H a N W O H I H H >a9 H A O Z U W IN CD az 04 H Ea co H >4 W Typical pavement • 4 4i 0 tr O O r—i 4) a) a) • 4J 4j ( a) a) 4 4J co u) w4 O 4) co 4 -P 0 • 4) 0 a 1n • O •n A a)• +) ,4 •r1 MI U 4J 4 O 4i 4j O 0 U) a 0 w H 4 -PH Typical pavement, • 4 O • 0 a) -H • 4J g O 4) 0 •,-1 r-1 r -I •H +P -P a� a) • a -P -P U) O z 4 4) N 4--• ) QJ -P a al lI 4) C V) a) cd • -P -P N 0 +J 1 0 4 4J a a a) .+, N U) Note settlement of pavement at trench. Utility box at 4th Street. Photo taken Photos of Strand wall showing the cracking along the top block resulting from the oxidation of the reinforcing steel in the top block. 5. Photo taken just north of 6th Street. it 'Sj2 1. 6. Photo taken just south of 9th Street. 7. Photo taken just south of 8th Street, illustrating how the weight of the wall has deflected and damaged the adjacent pavement. 8. Photo taken at 7th Street, illustrating the collection of debris at the base of the trash barrel and light pole, even after street sweeping. 9. Bikeway at 24th Street & Hermosa Avenue. 10. Bikeway on Hermosa Avenue looking north from 26th Street. 11. Bikeway on Hermosa Avenue looking north from 34th Street. 12. Bikeway on Hermosa Avenue at north City boundary line. Re -alignment to connect with Manhattan Beach bikeway is needed. DR'S Associates CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH LEGEND , ...., PFl I VATi;Ei;:11, Il il ,,. ! 11 it. • .,17.1 1 ,i :. :: ,:. - PROSPECT PARK _ . - • kl• tm In 41. , I I t .1. • .,. 1 . ( . ' ..., SEAVIEW . • 1 PARKETTE -- v .... 7 • _ : , I , . . SHOPPING -&--THEATERS P 11.: 5\ :El63./REEE14Vi0:0D:: :: y / ,.•- PARK .t: 1 ;I .10S.Aijj PAVIII;L' ION/ I, ;,.: 1,;._ 9- -, i! ii I ar NI ( , ! i ii iii i i I i. ,,-..:-..---- — .z4.11 1 0 01 'IzIN D6s;-= P A 13K ET 1: E HERMOSA_AVENUE BIKE_ROUTE THE STRAND BIKE ROUTE PIER/SHOPPING 0 AREA TO CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH 4)6 BIKE PATH6' .1* APPENDIX — EXHIBIT F TO CITY OF REDONDO BEACH BIKE ROUTE Figure 13 BICYCLE ROUTES AND GENERATORS OF BICYCLE TRAFFIC SUBTOTAL APPENDIX - EXHIBIT G STRAND WALL AND WALKWAY REPAIRS CONDITION INVENTORY CIP 90-144 JUNE -JULY 1991 STATION STRAND STRAND WALL FULL WIDTH AREA SPOT AREA LENGTH AREA (SF) (SF) (LF) (SF) 00+00 - 00+99 1129 256 4 3 1+00 - 1+99 436 184 85 74 2+00 -2+99 713 279 4 3 3+00 - 3+99 911 354 35 23 4+00 - 4+99 594 216 9 10 5+00 - 5+99 673 192 50 33 6+00 - 6+99 891 180 0 7+00 - 7+90 317 112 80 53 8+00 - 8+90 218 76 80 57 9+00 - 9+90 356 120 3 2 10+00 - 10+90 317 96 0 0 11+00 - 11+90 535 138 0 0 12+00 - 12+90 317 84 0 0 13+00 - 13+90 931 304 0 0 14+00 - 14+90 1089 204 0 0 15+00 - 15+90 673 188 0 0 16+00 - 16+90 673 240 0 0 17+00 - 17+90 1109 228 0 0 18+00 - 18+90 1287 296 0 0 19+00 - 19+90 950 128 0 0 20+00 - 20+90 396 260 0 0 21+00 - 21+90 1980 216 0 0 22+00 - 22+90' 1980 200 20 10 23+00 - 23+90 765 200 100 67 24+00 - 24+49 990 125 45 60 (00+00 -8TH ST.) 20228 4876 515 395 24+49 - 24+99 990 375 50 70 25+00 - 25+90 990 350 95 130 26+00 - 26+99 0 0 95 63 27+00 - 27+99 0 0 80 100 28+00 - 28+99 81 16 95 133 29+00 - 29+99 0 0 80 77 30+00 - 30+99 198 80 85 87 31+00 - 31+99 79 30 63 27 32+00 - 32+99 0 0 80 100 33+00 - 33+99 180 46 55 64 34+00 - 34+99 277 120 50 40 35+00 - 35+99 317 70 0 0 36+00 - 36+99 198 166 0 0 STRAND WALL AND WALKWAY REPAIRS CONDITION INVENTORY CIP 90-144 JUNE -JULY 1991 STRAND STRAND WALL STATION FULL WIDTH AREA SPOT AREA LENGTH AREA (SF) (SF) (LF) (SF) 1 1 1 1 1 1 37+00 - 37+99 0 0 6 21 38+00 - 38+99 0 0 68 72 39+00 - 39+99 158 80 25 20 40+00 - 40+99 119 124 0 0 41+00 - 41+99 158 40 1 1 42+00 - 42+99 475 64 95 101 43+00 - 43+99 317 36 50 47 44+00 - 44+83.04 0 0 73 75 SUBTOTAL (8th St. - 15th St.) 4538 1597 1146 1227 44+83.04 - 44+99 0 0 17 28 45+00 - 45 +99 1584 720 90 177 46+00 - 46 +99 1980 684 94 100 47+00 - 47+99 1980 1074 75 71 48+00 - 48+99 1980 602 85 77 49+00 49+99 1980 528 100 99 50+00 50+99 1980 670 85 80 51+00 - 51+99 1980 548 80 42 52+00 - 52+99 1782 500 90 56 53+00 - 53+99 1683 430 70 39 54+00 - 54+99 1980 620 75 60 55+00 55+99 1980 686 94 67 56+00 - 56+99 1980 656 85 69 57+00 - 57+99 1980 591 90 61 58+00 - 58+99 1980 1112 95 '73 59+00 - 59+99 1980 572 90 77 60+00 60+99 1980 682 98 96 61+00 61+99 1980 528 92 69 62+00 - 62+99 1980 562 95 110 63+00 - 63+99 1980 540 65 97 64'+00 - 64+99 1782 570 95 67 65+00 - 65+99 1980 658 92 67 66+00 - 66+99 1980 544 92 89 67+00 - 67+99 1980 686 100 82 68+00 - 68+99 1980 556 100 71 69+00 - 69+27.76 555 200 18 20 SUBOTAL (15th Street - 24th Street) 46986 15519 2162 1942 STRAND WALL AND WALKWAY REPAIRS CONDITION INVENTORY CIP 90-144 JUNE -JULY 1991 STRAND STRAND WALL 1 STATION FULL WIDTH AREA SPOT AREA' LENGTH AREA (SF) (SF) (LF) (SF) 1 1 1 1 1 1 69+27.76 - 69+99 1425 482 72 57 70+00 - 70+99 1980 522 100 73 71+00 - 71+99 1980 636 85 70 72+00 - 72+99 1980 504 100 77 73+00 - 73+99 1980 432 93 100 74+00 - 74+99 1980 432 58 123 75+00 - 75+99 1980 412 85 80 76+00 - 76+99 1980 594 85 80 77+00 - 77+99 1980 692 62 51 78+00 - 78+99 1980 1308 36 49 79+00 - 79+99 1841 1034 95 83 80+00 - 80+99 1881 1035 90 72 81+00 - 81+99 1346 1760 95 57 82+00 - 82+99 1980 1760 90 45 83+00 - 83+99 1980 1400 85 87 84+00 - 84+99 1980 1100 100 58 85+00 - 85+99 1980 800 90 55 86+00 - 86+99 1980 1100 95 53 87+00 - 87+99 1901 1056 100 61 88+00 - 88+99 1980 800 90 50 89+00 - 89+99 1980 1400 98 60 90+00 - 90+99 1980 800 90 48 91+00 - 91+99 1980 800 85 53 92+00 - 92+99 1980 800 85 47 93+00 - 93+99 1980 1100 100 67 94+00 - 94+99 1782 800 93 67 95+00 - 95+99 792 220 9 5 SUBTOTAL (24th Street - North border) 50569 23779 2266 1729 TOTAL REVISED 8/26/91 122321 45771 6089 5293 APPENDIX - EXHIBIT H Below are examples of sample architectural treatments that might be applied to the Strand wall. pworks/st December 5, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of December 10, 1991 REVIEW OF PURCHASING AND BIDDING PROCEDURES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council review and comment on the bidding procedures as appropriate. BACKGROUND: At the regular Council meeting of November 26, 1991, Council directed staff to ' prepare a report setting forth the current bidding procedures used by the City. ANALYSIS: There are several different procedures and policies governing purchases made by the City. Each of those procedures and policies will be discussed briefly and copies of the corresponding procedure or policy will be attached to this report. It is important to note that Section 2-50 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code addresses preference of local purchasing by stating that "It is the policy of the City to purchase supplies and equipment within the City whenever practicable." Purchases which are under $5.000 Purchases which are under $5,000 and cannot be made from petty cash or through the open purchase order method are made by way of an informal bid/quotation process. Section 2-56 of the Municipal Code sets forth the procedure and is attached to this report. Valid price quotes/bids must be obtained from at least three(3) vendors unless there is only one or two vendors for the product/service. A bid/quotation form must be completed, a purchase order issued and approved by the department head, and the purchase order approved by the 1 Finance Department and the City Manager's office prior to the purchase. A copy of the policy and procedure governing purchases under $5,000, Administrative Memorandum F-2, is attached to this report. Purchases which are over $5,000 Purchases which exceed $5,000 must be approved by City Council and require a formal sealed bid procedure. This procedure is set forth in Section 2-57 of the Municipal Code which is attached to this report. The procedure requires that a notice inviting bids must be given at least 10 days prior to opening bids; that the notice must be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City; or that the notice must be posted in at least three public places in the City. Currently our minimum practice, which exceeds requirements, is to publish the notice at least once in the Easy Reader and to post the notice on the public bulletin board at the entrance to City Hall. The procedure also calls for solicitation of bids from prospective suppliers who are on a bidders' list or who have requested to be on a bidders' list. While not all departments maintain a current bidders' list for all items it is common practice to send notices inviting bids to as many vendors as possible. Many of these vendors are identified by consulting various professional publications, by consulting with other municipalities, by maintaining a list of prospective vendors who have contacted the department, and by maintaining a list of vendors who have been contacted on previous bids. As sealed bids are received, they are maintained by the City Clerk. The sealed bids are then opened and recorded by the City Clerk on the date and time set for opening of the bids. Once opened, the bids are then evaluated by the department to determine the low bidder meeting all specifications and requirements. The department then prepares an agenda item for City Council approval and award of the bid to the vendor. 2 While there is the possibility that the purchasing and bidding procedures could be improved upon or expanded, it is staff opinion that the current practice meets or exceeds the established legal requirements. Steve Wisniewski, Interim City Manager 3 Sec. 2-56. Open market procedure for purchases of less than five thousand dollars in value. Purchases of supplies and equipment of an estimated value in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) or less may be made by the purchasing officer in the open market at the best prices obtainable and to the best advantage of the city without observing the procedure prescribed by section 2-57 ; provided, however, that when practicable, bids or quota- tions shall be taken as follows : (a) Minimum number of bids. At least three (3) bids or quotations solicited by written requests to prospective responsible vendors, by telephone, or public notice posted on a public bulletin board in the City Hall. (b) Record. A record of all informal bids and quotations shall be kept and be open to public inspection for a reasonable period of time. (Ord. No. 205 N.S., § 8; Ord. No. 373 N.S., § 1, 11-18-69; Ord. No. 76-527, § 1, 7-13-76) Sec. 2-57. Formal contract procedure for purchases exceeding five thousand dollars in value. Except as otherwise provided herein, purchases for supplies and equipment of estimated value greater than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) shall be by written contract with the lowest and best responsible bidder. The following procedure is deemed to be in the best interest to the city: (a) Notice inviting bids. Notice inviting bids shall in- clude a general description of the articles to be pur- chased, shall state where bid blanks and specifications may be secured, and the time and place for the open- ing of bids. (b) Published notice. Notice inviting bids shall be given at least ten days before the date of opening of the bids. Notice shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the city, or it shall be posted in at least three public places in the city that have been designated by ordinance as the places for posting public notices. (c) Bidders' list. The purchasing officer shall solicit sealed bids from all responsible prospective suppliers whose names are on the bidders' list or who have requested that their names be added thereto. (d) Bidder's security. When deemed necessary by the pur- chasing officer bidder's security may be prescribed' in the public notices inviting bids. Bidders shall be en- titled to return of bid security provided that a suc- cessful bidder shall forfeit his bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract within ten days after the notice of award of contract has been mailed, unless the city is responsible for the delay. The city council may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the next lowest bid- der; the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the city to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. (e) Bid opening procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the purchasing agent and shall be identified as bids on the envelope. Bids shall -be opened in public at the time and place stated in the public notices. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open to public inspection during regular business hours for a reasonable period of time. No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of at least thirty (30) days after the date set for the opening thereof. (f) Rejection of bids. In its discretion, the city council may reject any and all bids presented and re -advertise for bids or to exclude any item or items from the award of bid or waive any informalities on a bid. (g) Award of contracts. Contract shall be awarded by the city council to the lowest responsible bidder presenting the best bid to the city. In considering the lowest and best bid, the city council may take into consideration the location and availability of spare parts, availability of service and the vendor's experience with the com- modity he is offering and such factors as delivery, standardization and previous performance experience. (h) Tie bids. If two or more bids received are for the same total amount or unit price, quality and service be- ing equal, and if the public interest will not permit the delay of readvertising for bids, the city council may accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by negotiations with the tie bidders at the time of the bid opening. (i) Performance bonds. The city council shall have au- thority to require a performance bond before entering a contract in such amount as it shall find reasonably necessary to protect the best interest of the city. If the city council requires a performance bond, the form and amount of the bond shall be described : in the notice in- viting bids. (Ord. No. 205 N.S., § 9; Ord. No. 373, N.S., § 2, 11-18-69 ; Ord. No. 76-527, § 1, 7-13-76; Ord. No. 77-568, § 1(I) (b), 7-26-77) ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM T0: All Departments FROM. Viki Copeland, Finance Director FUNCTION: Finance N0: F2 SUBJECT:Purchasing Procedures for Supplies and Equipment The following are procedures for purchasing supplies and equipment. 1. Supplies or equipment of $25.00 value or less may be purchased with petty cash available from the City Treasurer's Office. (See Administrative Memorandum F-1) (Department Heads - see #11 below) 2. Supplies or equipment which exceed $5,000 shall be approved by City Council and require formal sealed bid as provided by in Municipal Code Section 2-57, "Formal contract procedure for purchases exceeding five thousand dollars in value." 3. Commonly used vendors should be Placed on the Open Purchase Order list by following the procedure outlined in Administrative Memorandum F-3. 4. No supplies or equipment may be ordered from the vendor until the approved purchase order is returned to the department. The only exceptions are; emergencies, as defined in Municipal Code Section 2-54, or supplies or equipment provided by a vendor from the Open Purchase Order list. (see Administrative Memorandum F-3) Any emergency purchase order requires an explanation o_f the emergency on the purchase order. 5 Purchase orders involving contracts shall include the following information on the face of the purchase order: Contract Amount Paid to Date Current Payment Contract Balance 6. For purchases of supplies and equipment less than $5,000, price quotes from at least three vendors are to be attached to the purchase order when submitted as defined in Municipal Code Section 2-56. If exact quotes are unavailable, estimates by vendor may be used and marked as such. Bid/Quotation sheets per the attached example must be completed and signed by requestor, noting information such as delivery fees, overrun on print orders, sales tax ISSUED: 12/20/82 - 1 - REVISED: 8/26/91 C requirements on out of state vendors, and business license,etc. A business license is required for all businesses located in Hermosa Beach, any business making a pickup/delivery in Hermosa Beach and all contractors. Purchase orders with bid sheets that have not been fully completed will be returned to requestor. 7. As stated by Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 2-50, "it is the policy of the City to purchase supplies and equipment within the City whenever practicable". 8. Upon receipt of supplies or equipment, the receiving copy of purchase order should be signed by the department head or designee and returned to Finance Department. Any packing slips or invoices should be attached. If an invoice is inadvertently mailed to the department placing the order it should be forwarded immediately to the Finance Department for payment so that any available discounts may be taken. Warrants are printed each Thursday and mailed on Monday. Invoices are paid net 30 days unless a discount is offered. 9. Purchase orders that require pre -payment (payment in advance of receiving of the item) must explain need for advance payment. An invoice showing the payment should be requested with payment. 10. Items charged to equipment accounts require a Fixed Assets Form attached to the purchase order. (See Administrative Memorandum F-8) 11. Monthly expense forms for Department Heads are to be used and submitted with a purchase order to the City Manager's office. Travel Request forms (for use in place of a purchase order on out of town travel) are to be obtained from the Finance Department and submitted to the City Manager for approval. (See Administrative Memorandum F-7). Viki Copeland Finance Director viki/purchase 7.7 Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager BID/QUOTATION SHEET ACCOUNT NUMBER: VENDORS: A) COMPANY: DELIVERY CHARGES:YES NO EXPECTED DEL DATE: ADDRESS: MAXIMUM OVERRUN: % CITY,STATE: (PRINT SERVICES) TELEPHONE: OUT OF STATE VENDOR: QUOTE FROM: WILL TAX BE ADDED YES TO INVOICE NO BUSINESS LICENSE: YES NO CONTRACTORS ONLY: YES LICENSE # WORKERS COMP INSURANCE NO (REQUIRED FOR CONTRACTORS AND BUSINESSES IN OR DELIVERING TO HERMOSA BEACH) B) COMPANY: DELIVERY CHARGE:YES NO EXPECTED DEL DATE: ADDRESS: MAXIMUM OVERRUN CITY,STATE: (PRINT SERVICES) TELEPHONE: OUT OF STATE VENDOR: WILL TAX BE ADDED YES QUOTE FROM: TO INVOICE NO BUSINESS LICENSE: YES NO CONTRACTORS ONLY: YES LICENSE # WORKERS COMP INSURANCE NO (REQUIRED FOR CONTRACTORS AND BUSINESSES IN OR DELIVERING TO HERMOSA BEACH) COMPANY: DELIVERY CHARGE:YES NO EXPECTED DEL DATE: ADDRESS: MAXIMUM OVERRUN: % CITY,STATE: (PRINT SERVICES) TELEPHONE: OUT OF STATE VENDOR: WILL TAX BE ADDED YES QUOTE FROM: TO INVOICE NO BUSINESS LICENSE: LICENSE # YES NO CONTRACTORS ONLY: YES WORKERS COMP INSURANCE NO (REQUIRED FOR CONTRACTORS #ITEMS PRODUCT DESCRIPTION AND BUSINESSES IN OR DELIVERING TO HERMOSA BEACH) VENDOR A VENDOR B VENDOR C EACH TOTAL EACH ITOTAL EACH [TOTAL DELIVERY LEASE EXTEND TOTALS FOR EACH VENDOR) TOTALS TAX REQUESTED BY: DATE: t, Mayor and Members of the City Council CITY COUNCIL Recommendation: December 3, 1991 City Council Meeting December 10, 1991 COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS - December 1991 Appoint delegates and alternates to the various committees (see attached list), consistent with the policy of maintaining permanent representatives whenever possible. Background: At the meeting of November 26, 1991, the newly elected Council members were seated. With the change in Council, it is necessary at this time to reassign delegates and alternates to the various committees. The current committee assignment listing (with meeting times noted) was distributed at the last meeting for review. Those committees requiring the Mayor as delegate are the Los Angeles County - City Selection Committee, South Bay Cities Sanitation District Board of Directors, and Inglewood Fire Training Authority (immediately follows the Sanitation District meeting). Three of the committee assignments require the adoption of. resolutions if the delegates and/or alternates are changed. If there are no changes, the existing resolutions remain in force. Attached are draft resolutions for the following committees: City Selection Committee of the Southern California Rapid Transit District - (Resolution 90-5410 lists Creighton as delegate and Sheldon as alternate). Board of Directors of the Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority - (Resolution 89-5336 lists Midstokke,as delegate and Viki Copeland as alternate). Independent Cities Risk Management - (Resolution 87-5095 lists Sheldon as delegate and Bob Blackwood as alternate). Also attached is the current committee assignment listing (with meeting times). Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager ) Elaine Doerflin y Clerk �� a 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING A MEMBER OF SAID COUNCIL OF SAID CITY TO THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO PART 3 OF DIVISION 10 OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the Southern California Rapid Transit District Law, being Part 3 of Division 10 of the Public Utilities Code of the State of California, the City Council does hereby appoint the following member of said Council as a member to the City Selection Committee: Delegate: Alternate: SECTION 2. That the within resolution shall become operative and the appointment made by Section 1 hereof shall be effective as of December 10, 1991. SECTION 3. That immediately after the effective date of the appointment hereby made, the City Clerk shall without delay forward a copy of this resolution, together with notice of the appointment made hereby, to the Secretary of the Southern California Rapid Transit District. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution; shall cause the action of the City Council in adopting same to be entered in the official minutes of said City Council; and shall retain this resolution, duly signed by the proper City officials in the official records of the City. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1991. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 89-5336 AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 89-5256, CHANGING THE CITY'S REPRESENTATIVE TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE INDEPENDENT CITIES LEASE FINANCE AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City Council desires to change its representa- tive to the Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-5256 on April 11, 1989, which appointed Councilmember Jim Rosenberger as the representative to the Authority; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-5336 on December 12, 1989, which amended Resolution No. 89-5256 by deleting Section 4 and replacing it with appropriate wording to appoint Councilmember Kathleen Midstokke as the representative to the Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Resolution No. 89-5336, appointing Council - member Kathleen Midstokke as the representative to the Authority, is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. That Resolution No. 89-5256 is hereby amended by deleting Section 4 and replacing it with the new following section: "SECTION 4. That the City Council hereby appoints , a member of the Council, to serve as the representative of the City on the Authority's Board of Directors, and Viki Copeland, a member of the staff the alternate representative of the City of Directors. Such appointments shall - 1 - of the City, to serve as on the Authority's Board be effective until the death, resignation, disqualification or subsequent removal by the 1 City Council of such representative.» 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 3. That this resolution shall be effective immedi- ately upon its passage. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution; and shall cause the action of the City Council in adopting same to be entered in the official minutes of said City Council. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1991. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City; of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TO APPOINT SPECIFIC REPRESENTATIVES TO THE INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach is a member of the 5 Independent Cities Risk Management Authority; and 6 WHEREAS, the' City of Hermosa Beach is a member of the 7 Liability Risk Management Committee; and 8 WHEREAS, the Amendment to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement 9 for Insurance and Risk Management Purposes dated May 13, 1987, 10 and the Risk Management Committee By -Laws require that an elected 11 official be appointed by resolution to the Governing Board of the 12 Authority and an alternate be appointed by resolution to act in 13 the primary member's absence; and 14 WHEREAS, the Amendment to Joint Exercise of. Powers Agreement 15 for Insurance and Risk Management Purposes dated May 13, 1987, 16 and the Risk Management Committee By -Laws require that a staff member be appointed ppointed as a voting member of each Risk Management 18 Committee that the City is a member of and another representative 19 to act in the primary member's absence. 20 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, 21 CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 22 SECTION 1. That the City of Hermosa Beach appoints the 23 Honorable to serve on the Governing Board of the' 24 Independent Cities Risk Management Authority. 25 SECTION 2. That the City of Hermosa Beach appoints Robert A. 26 Blackwood to serve on the Governing Board of the Independent 27 Cities Risk Management Authority in the absence of the primary 28 1 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 member noted in Section 1 above. SECTION 3. That the City of Hermosa Beach appoints Robert A. Blackwood to serve on the Liability Risk Management Committee. SECTION 4. That the individuals previously designated by this Council as the City's representative and alternate to the ICRMA Governing Board and to the Liability Risk Management Committee of the ICRMA are hereby confirmed and designated as the City's delegates to the ICRMA Governing Board for all purposes of representing the City's interests and exercising the authority of the City with respect to the coverage and the program and to the Governing Board and signing such amendments as are contemplated to be approved by the Governing Board Trust Agreement, and such individuals shall keep this Council informed of such matters on a timely basis. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1991. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 2 CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION OF DELEGATES, ALTERNATE APPOINTMENTS AND/OR RE -APPOINTMENT Beach Cities Coalition for Drug Free Youth. Delegate Beach Cities Committee Delegate 3RD COED. - 8 :00 A.M. Delegate Sheldon CSI Midstokke rnJ J►r QUARTERW - EvEMAIG3 ins CAI -1 -EO M Iz Commuter Trans•ortation Im•lementa Delegate Creighton nj2- Alternate ( MFIX fCaMMufER BUSSySTEM) Plan Steerin Committee !sr MOM: EVE,e9 °THE NONTH xNEXT MEET= I a/2/1i) 6: PM--ToRRAAICE Crry MI..L -WEST f}NAIE)C Essertier Coordinating Council Delegate Independent Cities Association Delegate She d Midstokke 1 h -i TriuRs. - ! 1:30 SCO TT9's - N B. Alternate Wiemans QUARTER j..44- DMO EA (i'jcirm16 NEsr = SA NTA ENVI - aAka./g2. Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority Delegate Midstokke A&AJU L - IN JuniE, A3 CArJ.ED Resolution No. 89-5336 Alternate Copeland Independent Cities Risk Delegate Alternate Management Association heldo a,uo TuES. - ►o:oo P.M- +ivarInlGToiJ RIRK • Resolution No. 87-5095 Blackwood Inglewood Fire Training Authority Commission Delegate Midstokke Alternate eldo (same as South Bay Sanitation District) 3RD UJE.b. I: 30 PN. ToRRAucL Cxrt1 H i -L League of California Cities Delegate Alternate - Board of Directors IsTTi?S- -(,:30 PM. 3500 RA io0A 51-v D - NotirERE9 PARK IruMraAMFtS RE -WHAM -1r Page 1 COARK INA 309) Appointments 06-25-91 Los Angeles County/City Selection Committee (must appoint alter- nate separately each time when unable to attend called meeting) Mayor Midstokke A3 C A ►.LE.D Sister City Association, Inc. Delegate Alternate Essertier 3RD I NuRS. 7To r7:3o PM - VA Riocg I.oCAr Io13S South Bay Cities Delegate Alternate South Bay Cities of Los Angeles) Delegate Alternate South Bay Delegate Alternate South Bay Delegate Essertier Wiemans Sanitation District (County Sanitation Districts (Same.as Inglewood Fire Training Authority) 3RD. (,JED. - l '• 30 P•M. ioRRRIOCF CIrry MAU..L �IrH IHuRS.-Di NER?EETIla; e. :30 PM. - "An3rE5"RE3TAURpMT SA n1'PED RO Midstokke Corridor Study Steering Essertier Wiemans Committee /.on -t{ So. BRci CrrrES 47-4 TN uR5. - , : oc) Pm. "Ao-E:s" M- "RrJrE:s" RESTRtXZAn)T SAN) PEDRO Juvenile Diversion Project heldo> Alternate Creighton QURFtrURW - AS CAl.1.EQ b :oo RM• -I- aoo No• P•C• N REDm= BfAQ! COMM. SERVICE BOG -OFFICE Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Delegate Midstokke Alternate Sheldon A0004L - GEK)E VILAS5E1183-t' Southern California Rapid Transit District Delegate Creighton Resolution No. 90-5410 Alternate Sheldon West Basin Water Association Delegate Wiemans Page 2 QUARTERDirJNER ME.Eri IG µ rN TTURs. - : 3o FM • "CMRRuE (5ROr•ui . - R. 6. Nov. = 3Rp.TNuAs) Appointments 06-25-91 Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project Delegate Midstokke Alternate Etta Simpson SUB -COMMITTEES Oil Sub -Committee (Temporary) Councilmember Essertier Councilmember Wiemans Data Processing Sub -Committee Temporary) Councilmember Creighton Councilmember Essertier `deputy/reorgapt Page 3 Appointments 06-25-91 TO: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Michael Schubach Director SUBJECT: Appointment of a Representative to the Municipal Area Express (MAX) Policy Steering Committee DATE: December 2, 1991 A replacement for Roger Creighton to the Policy Steering Committee is needed. The Committee meets the first Monday of every other month at 5:00 p.m. The Committee oversees the general operation of the bus line which is funded by 9 cities and the County of L.A. A sample agenda is attached. Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager p/memo5 ltd 3031 Torrance Boulevard Torrance, California 90509-2970 Telephone (213) 618-6266 • FAX (213) 618-6229 MAX MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS POLICY STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, December 2, 1991 5 p.m. West Annex Commission Meeting Room Torrance City Hall 3031 Torrance Boulevard Torrance, California 90503 AGENDA (***City Clerks Please Post***) I. Call to Order II. Action Items Administered by the City of Torrance Department of Transportation IIA. Approval of Minutes - November 4, 1991 meeting. IIB. Approval of motion to accept and file report of the City Clerk on posting the MAX agenda. IIC. Recommendation to authorize the Torrance City Council to pass a resolution to participate in the LACTC- coordinated paratransit plan. III. Information items IIIA. Oral report on implementation of procedural changes approved at the November 4, 1991 meeting. 1) Maintenance reporting. 2) Performance indicators. 3) Midday bus parking. 4) Warranty claims. A South Bay commuter bus service sponsored by the cities of El Segundo, Hermosa Beach, Lawndale, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills Estates, Torrance -Lead Agency; and Los Angeles County. POLICY STEERING COMMITTEE: Carl Jacobson, Chairperson • Mark Wirth, Vice -Chairperson • Roger Creighton • Carol Norman • Joan Mike Flores .• Pat Collins • Jacki Bacharach • W. Brad Parton • Hugh Muller • Deane Dana IIIB. Oral report on express. IIIC. Oral report on Services, Inc. funding of the Route #3 freeway the performance of DAVE Transportation IIID. Oral report on MAX ridership. IV. Public Comment V. Other Business VI. Adjournment Note: Staff recommends that the next PSC meeting be scheduled for Monday, February 3, 1992 at 5 p.m., in the Torrance City Hall West Annex Commission Meeting Room. 0 82 0 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED ( 169 ) BUILDING II H" ❑ O ❑ ❑ PARKING STRUCTURE BELOW r ♦ STOP RA k'P DOWN 6=`I NEW RELIT F IF, PARK. 'NG I L I 1 I i I i%- •IT.P 1= 21 1 • --� L- I- -„111 VONS MARKET NO. 110 36,800 SO. FT. 230'-0" -a F EXISTING CART t. CONTAINMENT STOP 3 • i• `+ Y �1 7. - r 1,„,::: 4 dols —LIMITS OF PARKING STRUCTURE BELOW 3 dOiS 4' to 0 4STOP SHOP IBLDG. "E" PAD t PLANTER z W CC W D �b—y! 7_ O jrn Q W^ < _Z U O U U Q C/) S o o(n4 r a 4 a 0 r SHOP BLDG "D" PAD c. 1- 1- t.1 4 4 E EXISTING RESTAURANT i AAP Ul (3 i PARKING DATA TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 461 TOTAL PARKJNG SHOWN = - 463 STANDARD PARKING STALLS 9'-O" X 20'-O" = 327 COMPACT PARKING STAT! S 7-6" X 15'-C = 138 MAXIMUM COMPACT - 307 = (138) PROVIDED COMPACT STALLS = (136) _NOfl SHADED AREA INDICATES UNITS OF REST RIPE AND SLURRY OF COMPACT STALLS ONLY. PROJECT ADDRESS O O 0) CC 0 z 1;: E `C W I- - O F�^C W H z O HERMOSA BEACH, TELEPHONE NO. N • om• 0 � 1 z 0 1- 0 U IJ 0 w 0 <1 JOB N0. 9121 CIC C BLDG. DEPT. DRAWN BY J. ORTIZ HEALTH DEPT. CHECKED BY BIDDING CONTENT OF SHEt--I SITE F= LAN SHEET SD OF