Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/24/91.1' September 17, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 24, 1991 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE INTERIM CITY MANAGER PAY FOR PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR STEVE WISNIEWSRI Recommendation: That the City Council approve a resolution providing an interim City Manager pay differential for Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski at a minimum of 5% of base pay, effective September 16, 1991. Background: At the City Council meeting of September 10, 1991, the Council announced the appointment of Steve Wisniewski as Interim City Manager, effective September 16; 1991. You also indicated it was your desire to have Community Resources Director Mary Rooney serve as Interim Assistant City Manager. Analysis: The City Manager position is exempt, so no formal rules apply. However, to follow the City's rules for other acting assignments, it would be appropriate for a minimum 5% adjustment of base sala- ry be provided for the assumption of larger duties. It should be noted that in the Chief's case, he will no longer be eligible for 5% merit pay, so he potentially will not receive any additional funds as a result of a differential of only 5%. The Assistant City Manager assignment is made by the City Manager pursuant to the Management Employees Compensation Resolution. Such assignment, including a 5% pay differential for Mary Rooney, was made effective September 16, 1991. Mary will continue to be eligible for the 5% merit pay as well. In order to free time for the department heads to assume these new duties, an Acting Police Chief has been assigned in the Police Department, and changes in responsibilities are being worked out in the Community Resources department. The two department heads are orienting to their new duties and assuming increasingly greater responsibility, culminating in assumption of their full duties on October 7, 1991. Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ld 1.I 1 2 3 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING A PAY DIFFERENTIAL FOR INTERIM CITY MANAGER 4 WHEREAS, under the provisions of Ordinance No. N. S. 153, 5 establishing a City Manager form of government for this city, the 6 City Council shall, following the termination of the employment 7 of the present City Manager, appoint an interim City Manager to 8 serve until such time as a permanent City Manager is designated, 9 10 11 12 13 and WHEREAS, at the regular Council meeting of September 10, 1991, the Council announced the appointment of Public Safety Di- rector Steve Wisniewski as interim City Manager; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA 14 BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 15 SECTION 1. That pursuant to Ordinance No. N. S. 153 and 16 Article II, Section 2-7 of the Municipal Code of the City of Her - 17 mosa Beach, that a pay differential of 5% of base pay shall be 18 provided Steve Wisniewski for duties of Interim City Manager. 19 The differential shall be effective on September 16, 1991 and 20 terminate when the Interim City Manager assignment ends. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 24th day of,September, 21 22 23 1991. 24 II PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California 25 26 27 28 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY September 17, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 24, 1991 RECRUITMENT FOR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Recommendation: To receive and file this information matter. Background: The former Public Works Director Tony Antich resigned and left the City's employ on September 5. A recruitment was begun on August 19 and is continuing. Due to the subsequent resignation of the City Manager, it was appropriate to consider whether or not to discontinue the recruitment pending the selection of a new City Manager. Analysis There is an advantage to allowing a new City Manager to select his or her new Public Works Director. However, the time con- straints to recruit, select, bring on board, and orient a new manager could mean that a new director would not be on board for six to eight months. Further, the existing effort to recruit for Public Works Director would largely be wasted, as the applica- tions may well be stale by the point that the recruitment is reconvened. The need for a full time Public Works Director is significant, that department being one of the larger of the City with very broad span of control. In addition, the City has a very aggres- sive Capital Improvement Program that needs close monitoring. Finally, preparation for the retirement of several long term em- ployees in the next year will require strong management. For these reasons, both the departing City Manager and the Inter- im City Manager are in concurrence that the recruitment should be conducted and an appointment should be made prior to the hiring of a new city manager. The appointment decision should involve other department heads, the Interim Public Works Director, and the Interim City Manager so that a suitable selection that will fit the City's needs and meet the new city manager's expectations will be achieved. 'Kevin B. Northc hft City Manager KBN/ld Steve Wisniewski Interim City Manager ih /R0/ Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. 'The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) $ THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. "Ability will never catch up with the demand for it." -Malcolm F. Forbes AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 24, 1991 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Kathleen Midstokke MAYOR PRO TEM Robert Essertier COUNCILMEMBERS Roger Creighton Charles Sheldon Albert Wiemans Closed Session - 6:00 p.m. Regular Session - 7:30 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER Gary L. Brutsch CITY MANAGER Kevin B. Northcraft CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Cham- ber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: HERMOSA VALLEY SCHOOL STUDENT OF THE MONTH: Carolyn Bruck CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESENTATIONS RE. WAVE SHUTTLE BUS SERVICE FOR THE FIESTA AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE COM- MUNITY FOR PALM TREES DOWNTOWN. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on September 10, 1991. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive, and to cancel certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file August, 1991 finan- cial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. Recommendation to receive and file the procedures and time line for Cable Television Franchise renewal. Memo- randum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated September 16, 1991. (f) (g) (h) Recommendation to deny the following claims and refer to the City's Claims Administrator: 1) Edstrom, Joel S. and Adams, Margaret I., 650 LaLoma Road, Pasadena, CA 91105, filed August 26, 1991, alleged negligent operation of (City) vehicle cau- sed property damage; 2) Murray, Michael E., represented by Jeffery S. Pop & Associates, filed September 3, 1991, alleging dan- gerous condition and improper design of roadway; 3) Price, Aimee E., represented by Jeffery S. Pop & Associates, filed September 3, 1991, alleging dan- gerous condition and improper design of roadway. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated Sep- tember 10, 1991. Recommendation to confirm Planning Commission inter- pretation of applicable setbacks on "half lots"on alley/ street corner lots. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 17, 1991. Recommendation to receive and file report on Public Works Director recruitment. Memorandum from City Man- ager Kevin B. Northcraft and Interim City Manager Desig- nee Steve Wisniewski dated September 17, 1991. (i) (m) (P) (q) Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment for one General Services Officer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated September 6, 1991. Recommendation to submit an application for proposed specific projects to the Mountain Recreation and Conser- vation Authority for inclusion in the Los Angeles Coun- ty Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated Sep- tember 17, 1991. Recommendation to approve increase of funds for ad- ministration and inspection services for the slurry sealing project (CIP 90-170). Memorandum from Acting Public Works Director William Glickman dated September 16, 1991. Recommendation to approve Acting City Manager pay for Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski, with resolution for adoption. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 17, 1991. Recommendation to change buy-out fees for metered park- ing spaces to $15.00 per space/day. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry Staten dated Sep- tember 16, 1991. Recommendation to receive and file City Attorney opinion on reconstruction of nonconforming buildings partially destroyed, and direct clarification of damaged structure valuation language in the Zoning Code, with resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Building and Safety Di- rector William Grove dated September 18, 1991. Recommendation to authorize disposition of forfeited property pursuant to Section 11473.3 of the Health and Safety Code. Memorandum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dated September 18, 1991. Recommendation to receive and file status report regard- ing storm water discharge permit. Memorandum from Interim Public Works Director William Glickman dated September 17, 1991. Recommendation to approve agreement with Edward Kreins for for City Manager recruitment services. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 19, 1991. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from John and Margaret Sabo, 447 Herondo St., #305, dated September 3, 1991, requesting installation of a sidewalk on Valley Drive in the area of South School. (Referred to staff for recommendation.) (b) Letter from David Suess, 1246 First Street, dated Sep- tember 10, 1991 re. traffic control concerns on Prospect Avenue. (Note: A staff meeting with Mr. Suess is scheduled for September 24, 1991.) Staff Recommenda- tion: receive and file. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A 2 -LOT SUBDIVI- SION AT 596 - 19TH STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 16, 1991. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE CONTRACT WITH KENNETH MEERSAND AS CITY PROSECUTOR. Memorandum from Public Safety Di- rector Steve Wisniewski dated September 16, 1991. 7. RECOMMENDATION TO CONCEPTUALLY AWARD AGREEMENT FOR RECORDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated September 17, 1991. 8. PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR COMMISSIONER TERM LIMITATIONS. Memorandum from City Manager Kevin B. Northcraft dated September 19, 1991. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 10. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Vacancies - Boards and Commissions Planning Commission - One unexpired term ending June 30, 1992. (b) Letter from Planning Commissioner Michael Stifano, dated September 12, 1991. (Placed on the agenda by request of Mayor Midstokke for consideration of removal from Plan- ning Commission position.) 11. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Sheldon for reconsideration of direction to hold hearing on oil lease. - 4 - Request by Councilmember Essertier for of determining percentage of remodel. Request by Councilmember Essertier for tion of basement for building purposes. review of method review of defini- Request by Councilmember Essertier for review on how height of new development is measured from natural grade. Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on Tuesday, September 10, 1991, at the hour of 7:35 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - the closed session was held at 6:05 P.M., regarding matters of Personnel: pursuant to Government Code Sec- tion 54957.6; and matters of Real Property Negotiations with Mac- pherson Oil regarding the City Yard site: pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. The closed session was recessed at 7:29 P.M. to the regular scheduled public meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Missy Sheldon, Community Center Foundation ROLL CALL Present: Creighton, Essertier, Sheldon, Wiemans, Mayor Midstokke Absent: None ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Midstokke read a tribute to John P. Barry, former Hermosa Beach City Prosecutor from November 1970 to his retirement in August 1990, and announced that tonight's meeting would be adjourned in his memory. PROCLAMATIONS - Coastweeks, September 21 - October 14, 1991; Mayor Midstokke presented a proclamation proclaiming September 21, 1991 as "Coastal Cleanup Day" to Mary Rooney, Director of Community Resources, on behalf of the. City, and urged all citizens to participate in Hermosa Beach coastal cleanup celebra- tions. Director Rooney urged all Hermosa residents to join in "Coastal Cleanup Day" starting at 8:00 A.M. at the base of the Pier and continuing to noon when a barbecue lunch would be provided. - Ride Share Week, September 23 - 27, 1991; Mayor Midstokke presented a proclamation proclaiming September 23 through September 27, 1991 as "Rideshare Week" to Robert Black- wood, Personnel Director, on behalf of the City, and urged all citizens to honor this time and consider ways to conserve our national resources by using alternate means of transportation. Director Blackwood announced that Tuesday, September 24, 1991, was "Keep California Moving Day" and urged all Hermosa residents to pledge to use alternate transportation or rideshare. - Constitution Week, September 17 - 23, 1991; Mayor Midstokke presented a proclamation proclaiming the week of September 17 through September 23, 1991 as "Constitution Week" to Wilma Burt of the El Redondo Chapter of the National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution, and urged all citizens to pay special attention to our Federal Constitution and the ad- vantages of United States of America Citizenship. PRESENTATION TO MISSY SHELDON FROM THE COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION - Director Rooney introduced George Schmeltzer, former Mayor and current Community Center Foundation President, who City Council Minutes 09-10-91 Page 7553 1a s ti presented a plaque of appreciation to Missy Sheldon for her ser- vice to the community and her many hours of volunteer work with the Community Center Foundation Board of Directors. Missy Sheldon thanked the Foundation and the City for the opportunity and announced the upcoming events at the Community Center as: 1) the final program of the Concert Series on September 28, 1991 at 8:00 P.M., featuring the calypso music of Andy Narell; and, 2) the "Hermosa High School Reunion" dance and fund raiser on Oc- tober 19, 1991. INTRODUCTIONS - City Manager Northcraft introduced William Glickman, interim Public Works Director, a former Public Works Director for the City of El Segundo. Mr. Glickman thanked the City Manager and the City Council for the opportunity to work for Hermosa Beach. Mayor Midstokke announced that Naoma Valdes had been appointed as the full time Deputy City Clerk. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, commended MultiVision Cable TV for its donation to 1736 Family Crisis Center and suggested other busi- nesses might consider donating air conditioning to the Library; Michael Stifano - 1704 Loma Drive, explained to the Council that he would not be available for a meeting on September 19th and questioned the reason for the meeting request by the Council. Mayor Midstokke responded that the Council wished to talk about his philosophy regarding his role as a Planning Commissioner and the responsibilities he has assumed, and set a ten- tative date of Tuesday, September 24, 1991 at the hour of 6:00 P.M. for the meeting. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (o), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3 but are listed in order for clarity: (c) Mayor Midstokke, (f) Wiemans, and (j) requested by the City Manager. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed for further discussion. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on August 27, 1991. City Council Minutes 09-10-91 Page 7554 (b) (c) (d) (e) Action: To approve the minutes of August 27, 1991 as presented. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 38080 through 38142 inclusive and Nos. 34144 through 38236 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 38080, 38082, 38083, 38100, 38145, 38146, and 38177. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Mayor Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To have the agreement with Macpherson Oil, scheduled for September 24, 1991 deferred to the meeting of October 8, 1991, or later if necessary, in order for it to be legally noticed for a public hearing. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered, noting the objections of Essertier and Wiemans. Further Action: To set the Sheriff's study for October 22, 1991, with the understanding that there may be fur- ther delay. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. Mayor Midstokke directed that the tentative future agen- da also contain items for November: swearing-in of newly elected officials; December: committee assignments; and March: rotation of the Mayor's seat. Final Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Creighton. So ordered. Recommendation to receive and file the August, 1991 monthly investment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer Gary L. Brutsch dated September 4, 1991. Action: To receive and file the August, 1991, monthly investment report. Recommendation to ratify the appropriation of funds for escrow deposit on South School acquisition. Memorandum from Finance Director Viki Copeland dated September 3, 1991. Action: To ratify the appropriation of $200,000 from the Park and Recreation Facility Tax Fund to CIP 515 for the escrow deposit on South School. City Council Minutes 09-10-91 Page 7555 (f) (g) (h) Recommendation to approve revised class specification for Public Works Director/City Engineer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated September 3, 1991. Supplemental memorandum from Personnel Direc- tor Blackwood dated September 10, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. Proposed Action: To approve the revised class specification with the addition of a required certifi- cate registration number lower than C-33965 or the re- quirement of a California Licensed Surveyor registration certificate. Motion Wiemans. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Interim Public Works Director William Glickman reported that these requirements were necessary for the Director to sign maps, but Hermosa Beach had always had their maps signed by the County, therefore the requirement was unnecessary for the City's job description. Action: To approve the revised class specification for Public Works Director/City Engineer to reflect the cur- rent duties and responsibilities of the position as re- viewed and developed by the incumbent Public Works Di- rector and staff, for use in the hiring of a replacement Public Works Director. Motion Essertier, second Sheldon. The motion carried, noting the objections of Wiemans and Mayor Midstokke. Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #21160 for a two -unit condominium at 333 Tenth Street. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated August 28, 1991. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 91-5486, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #21160 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 333 TENTH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." Recommendation to adopt resolution approving Final Map #21688 for a three -unit condominium at 1460 Loma Drive. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 4, 1991. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 91-5487, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #21688 FOR A THREE -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 1460 LOMA DRIVE, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA." City Council Minutes 09-10-91 Page 7556 (i) (j) (k) (1) Recommendation to adopt resolution modifying a condi- tional use permit for a drive-thru take-out window in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant on prop- erty located at 1160 Aviation Blvd., ',Jack -In -The -Box." Memorandum from Planning Director Michael-Schubach dated September 5, 1991. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 91-5488, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO MODIFY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THRU TAKE-OUT WINDOW IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OPERATION OF A RESTAURANT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1160 AVIATION BOULEVARD, "JACK-IN-THE-BOX", LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1-4 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 149, REDONDO VILLA TRACT." Recommendation to adopt resolution establishing a time limit parking zone on the east curb west of driveways at 446 Monterey Blvd. Memorandum from Public Works Direc- tor Anthony Antich dated August 26,1991. This item was removed by the City Manager in order to add the amount of the time limit to the Resolution. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 91-5490, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A TIME LIMIT PARKING ZONE.", to place a time limit parking zone between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday for the location of Monterey Boulevard on the east curb west of Culper Court west of the driveways in front of Monterey Boulevard for a total distance of approximately 40 feet. And, with the addi- tion of, "...15 minute time limit parking zone", to both Section 1 and Section 2 of the Resolution. Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. So ordered. Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Easter Seal Organization for space at the Community Center. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 29, 1991. Action: To approve the lease agreement with the Easter Seals Organization for rooms 14, 16, and 17 in the Com- munity Center for a total of $2,208 per month (2,760 square feet at a cost of $.80 per square foot) from Oc- tober 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992; $2,318 per month (2,760 square feet at a cost of $.84 per square foot) from July 1, 1992 to September 30, 1992; and to authorize the Mayor to sign the lease agreement. Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Hope Chapel for space at the Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated August 29, 1991. City Council Minutes 09-10-91 Page 7557 (m) (n) (o) Action: To approve the lease agreement with the Hope Chapel for rooms 5 and 6A in the Community Center for a total of $739 per month (924 square feet at a cost of $.80 per square foot) from October 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992; $776 per month (924 square feet at a cost of $.84 per square foot) from July 1, 1992 to August 31, 1992; and to authorize the Mayor to sign the lease agreement. Recommendation to receive and file report on Commercial/ Parking Study for Areas 1-4. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated September 3, 1991. Action: To receive and file the report on Commercial/ Parking Study for areas 1 through 4 showing a deficiency of approximately 2,884 off-street parking spaces citywide. Recommendation to approve removal of meters in Lot H and request to remove meter poles. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated August 28, 1991. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct the Meter Maintenance Specialist and the Public Works Department to cause the removal of the meters and meter poles located in the motorcycle lot, Lot H (74 - 14th Street), and allow the lot to be used for stack parking. Recommendation to adopt resolution authorizing the in- stallation of two (2) green zones on Pier Avenue in front of the Community Center. Memorandum from Acting General Services Director Henry L. Staten dated August 28, 1991. Action: To approve Resolution No. 91-5489, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A GREEN ZONE.", which removes meters #C-28 and #C-29 to be replaced with two (2) fifteen (15) minute green zones directly in front of the Community Center walkway entrance to the offices to accommodate short-term visitors or deliveries. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE.NO. 91-1058 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17 (LICENSE AND PERMITS) TO ADD "COMMERCIAL PROPERTY RENT- AL,' AS IT RELATES TO BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 91-1058. Motion Essertier, second Mayor Midstokke. So ordered, noting that Councilmember Sheldon abstained from the vote due to a conflict of interest. City Council Minutes 09-10-91 Page 7558 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(c), (f) and (j) were discussed at this time, but are shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (a) Letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue, dated August 21, 1991, regarding rebuilding of legal but non- conforming condominiums in event of destruction by fire. (Referred to City Attorney. Staff recommendation: receive and file.) Action: To receive and file, with the understanding that an opinion will be rendered by the City Attorney in a few weeks. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Essertier. So ordered. (b) Letter from David Suess, 1246 First Street, dated August 28, 1991, regarding Council policies toward traffic on south Prospect Avenue. (Referred to Planning Department for response. Staff recommendation: receive and file.) Supplemental letter to David Suess from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated September 9, 1991. Action: To receive and file, with the understanding that a meeting will be held with Mr. Suess shortly. Motion Sheldon, second Creighton. So ordered. (c) Letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue, dated September 3, 1991, regarding records availability, and response from City Manager dated September 3, 1991. (Staff recommendation: receive and file.) Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, requested a clarification regarding the ten-day period for response in producing documents. City Attorney Vose responded that all departments were required to respond promptly, but had up to ten days, if needed, in which to respond to requests for documents. Action: To receive and file Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None City Council Minutes 09-10-91 Page 7559 MUNICIPAL MATTERS 5. DISCUSSION OF CITY MAINTAINING SCHOOL PROPERTY IN EXCHANGE FOR ALLOWING USE OF SCHOOL PROPERTY FOR RECRE- ATION WHEN AVAILABLE. Memorandum from Community Resour- ces Director Mary Rooney dated September 3, 1991. Supplemental memorandum of survey of other cities from Marsha Ernst, Community Resources Department, dated Sep- tember 11, 1991. Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Cathy McCurdy - 1113 Valley Drive, encouraged the Council to support this item; Mary Lou Weiss - 2506 Ardmore, Hermosa Beach School Board, stated the open space area at Valley School was used by the entire community, not just school children, citing its use by AYSO and Little League, and requested a partnership with the Council on the maintenance, stating that she favored an agreement before any money was appropriated on the part of the City; and, Elaine Gourley - Hermosa Beach School District Superintendent, stated that many schools in other areas were all pavement and did not have grass to provide the recreational opportunities the the Valley School site did; she urged a partnership with the City for maintenance and after school programs. Action: To direct staff to work with the School Dis- trict and come back to Council with a draft of a formal agreement for its consideration before the expenditure of funds, noting that conceptual approval had been given. Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Sheldon. So ordered, noting the objection of Essertier. The meeting recessed at 8:47 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:04 P.M. 6. CONSIDERATION OF HIRING FIRM TO RECRUIT FOR CITY MAN- AGER. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated September 4, 1991. Action: To approve hiring Edward S. Kreins as the ex- ecutive recruitment firm at a cost of $4,500, plus a not to exceed figure of $1,000 for interview site expenses, advertising and related costs. Motion Sheldon, second Essertier. So ordered. Mayor Midstokke announced that the Council had selected Steve Wisniewski, Public Safety Director, as interim City Manager and • City Council Minutes 09-10-91 Page 7560 Mary Rooney, Community Resources Director, as interim Assistant City Manager. Both had accepted, and would be appointed as interim City Manager designee and interim Assistant City Manager designee, respectively, on September 16, 1991 through October 6, 1991. On October 7, 1991, both would assume their interim appointments. 7. REVIEW OF CITY VISION STATEMENT. Memorandum from Per- sonnel Director Robert Blackwood dated September 3, 1991. Action: To remove the current "City Vision" statement from the front sheet of the agendas, leaving the state- ment, "Where there is no vision the people perish...". Motion Mayor Midstokke, second Creighton. The motion carried, with the objections of Essertier and Sheldon. 8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Northcraft reported: 1) the yellow ribbons on the front of City Hall would be removed since it had been announced that the White House was removing its ribbons; 2) a reminder that staff was preparing questions to go back to the Sheriff's Department and was seeking input from the Council and the public, the deadline to submit questions was set at Monday, September 16, 1991; and, 3) he wanted to thank the Council for appointing an interim City Manager quickly and would try to com- plete a list of 21 items before he left. 9. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL Mayor Midstokke directed that the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission proposal for a bonfire on the beach in conjunction with the "Christmas Sing -Along" be agendized for Council discussion of waiving the Municipal Code Section 5-12 prohibiting fires on the beach; and, questioned why the televised recess time of the City Council meetings was aired blank rather than used to show promotional material for upcoming City functions, such as Community Center events. (a) Request from Civil Service Board to solicit applications to fill vacant position. Memorandum from Personnel Di- rector Robert Blackwood dated August 3, 1991. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter was: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, to question the procedure used by other Council candidates regarding resignation or leave of absence. City Council Minutes 09-10-91 Page 7561 A. Action: To direct the City Clerk to advertise a vacancy on the Civil Service Board, with the deadline for filing applications after the November 5, 1991 elections. Motion Essertier, second Creighton. So ordered. 10. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Mayor Midstokke for discussion of placing term limitations on the Civil Service Board. City Attorney Vose stated that he believed term limita- tions for the Civil Service Board would not have to go to a vote of the people as it was merely a procedural matter. Action: To include term limitations for the Civil Ser- vice Board with the Ordinance being drafted by the City Attorney regarding definition of terms and procedure for removing a Commissioner during a term. Motion Creighton, second Essertier. So ordered. CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time was: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, expressed concern regarding articles in a local newspaper; expressed support for Hermosa Police and Police Chief; and, disagreed with the idea of two current Councilmem- bers interviewing Council candidates as a Cable TV program. ADJOURNMENT IN MEMORY OF JOHN BARRY, FORMER CITY PROSECUTOR FROM NOVEMBER, 1972 TO AUGUST, 1990 The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned in the memory of John Barry, former City Prosecutor, on Tuesday, September 11, 1991 at the hour of 9:47 P.M. to a closed session to discuss matters of Real Estate Negotiations with Macpherson Oil for the City Yard site, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 The closed session adjourned at 10:52 P.M. to a Special Meeting to be held on Thursday, Sep- tember 19, 1991 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of interviewing Planning Commission applicants. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 09-10-91 Page 7562 F.INANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:13:46 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/8-16 TO'8-31-91 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-91 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-91 H H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-91 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-91 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-91 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-91 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/B-16 TO 6-31-91 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL.ACCOUNT PAYROLL/8-16 TO 8-31-91 CITY OF_HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00243 001-202-0000-2030 09/04/91 00243 105-202-0000-2030 09/04/91 00243 109-202-0000-2030 09/04/91 00243 110-202-0000-2030 09/04/91 00243 145-202-0000-2030 09/04/91 00243 155-202-0000-2030 09/04/91 00243 160-202-0000-2030 09/04/91 00243 170-202-0000-2030 09/04/91 00243 305-202-0000-2030 09/04/91 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 PAYROLL/8-16 TO 6-31-91 09/04/91 705-202-0000-2030 00437 4243, 563. 92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 48, 562. 42 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00041 41,243.10 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00245 $46, 755. 92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00238 41, 872.93 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00239 4934.80 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00237 47, 999. 60 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00093 417, 848.85 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00008 41, 117.33 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00201 44, 721.00 /ACCRUED PAYROLL J PAGE 0001 DATE 09/12/91 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ititatirjtatjtitjtttjtitat*atitataHtit*atatat*it*tt*itetttititjtit-nit*it-statttitatit#*itititittttt*tt****atttitit**** 4334, 619. 87 H PATRICK JAMES*O'NEAL REIMB SEIZED FUNDS 04256 170-300-0000-3304 09/10/91 00072 47, 331.76 /FORFEITED FUNDS *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************ -x**#******* -x*# -x****# 47, 331.76 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00525 496,736.78 RETIREMENT ADV/AUG 91 09/09/91 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** •-- 496,736.78 *** PAY CODE TOTAL*******'********************************************************** 4438,688.41 R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS MISC. CHARGES/SEP 91 00857 001-400-2101-4306 6604 09/10/91 POLICE 01038 455.50 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $0.00 $0.00 40. 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 38143 0 09/12/91 38143 09/12/91 38143 09/12/91 38143 J 09/12/91 38143 09/12/91 38143 09/12/91 38143 09/12/91 38143 $0.00 09/12/91 $0.00 $0.00 03109 $0.00 38143 09/12/91 38143 09/12/91 38238 09/12/91 38237 40.00 09/12/91 0 J 6604 00095 38241 0 40.00 09/12/91 FINANCE-5FA340 TIME_ 15:15:46 PAY VENDOR NAME ''DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL **********************atter*********stir**********************erg******** F. AVIATION LOCK Ec KEY MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 00407 001-400-2101-4309 08/31/91 POLICE PAGE 0002 DATE 09/12/91 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $53.50 00441 $8.11 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** P. BANC ONE LEASING 99 02154 001-400-4205-6900 00092 $417.96 $8.11 LEASE PMT/SEPTEMBER 91 66-01 09/01/91 EQUIP SERVICE /LEASE PAYMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R BEACH CITIES OFFICE SUPPLY MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 00087 38242 $0.00 09/12/91 63-5500566-01 00030 38243 $0.00 09/12/91 *417.96 02509 001-400-2101-4305 01581 $33.72 08/31/91. POLICE__ 02509 001-400-2201-4305 08/31/91 FIRE _____/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 00489 $49.36 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 02509 001-400-4101-4305 00564 $41.87 08/31/91 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES _ 02509 001-400-4201-4305 00703 $87.68 08/31/91 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER. SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BERIAN PRINTING SERVICE, INC. BUS CARDS/PLANNING 2738 $212.63 02664 001-400-4101-4305 00563 $86.60 08/20/91 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R BRAUN LINEN SERVICE PRISONER LAUNDRY/AUG 91 70664 $86.60 00163 001-400-2101-4306 01037 $224.15 08/31/91 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL************************ai******************************************* R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 DUMP CHARGES/AUG 91 37002 08/31/91 $224.15 00088 38244 $0.00 09/12/91 00088 38244 $0.00 09/12/91 00088 38244 $0.00 09/12/91 00088 38244 $0.00 09/12/91 2738 01931 38245 $86.60 09/12/91 70664 00089 38246 $0.00 09/12/91 001-400-3103-4201 00351 $3,038.13 910800-0037002 00004 38247 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/12/91 17/ FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH . _ DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION - • -- *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R BSI CONSULTANTS, INC. SEWER DESIGN SERV/JUL 91 78316 PACE 0003 DATE 09/12/91 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP . • $3,038.13 00630 305-400-8406-4201 00070 $13,126.43 78316 02930 08/20/91 CIP 88-406 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $13,126.43 R C. P. P.A. REG/HITE/STATEN VENDOR TOTAL 03329 110-400-3302-4316 00215 $450.00 09/04/91 PARKING ENF /TRAINING ******************************************************************** R MATTHEW*CAHN MATERIALS/TRAINING CLASS $450. 00 02626 001-400-2101-4316 00776 $55.00 08/27/91 POLICE /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R CARE STATION 03972 WORK COMP EXAM/GAINES 882-0 07/31/91 $55. 00 001-400-1203-4320 00384 $54.00 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R WARREN*CARTER PER DIEM ADVANCE 04257 TR380 09/10/91 $54.00 001-400-1205-4317 00052 $75.00 CABLE TV /CONFERENCE EXPENSE *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $75. 00 * * * R CHAMPION CHEVROLET 00014 001-400-2101-4311 01221 $15.31 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 66059 08/31/91 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE _. VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $15. 31 R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/AUG 91 99634 R CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORM RENTAL/AUG 91 99634 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00179 08/31/91 PUB WKS ADMIN 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00308 08/31/91 PARKING ENF $627. 15 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $52. 50 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 38248 09/12/91 01696 38249 $0.00 09/12/91 02615 .1 38250 ) $0.00 09/12/91 13882-0 03011 $0. 00 38251 09/12/91 TR380 00380 38252 $0.00 09/12/91 166059 00812 38253 $0.00 09/12/91 99634 00002 38254 I. $0.00 09/12/91 ! 99634 00002 38254 $0.00 09/12/91 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COAST GLASS COMPANY MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 PAGE 0004 DATE 09/12/91 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 8679. 65 00325 001-400-4204-4309 02091 810.72 08/31/91 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************************************•********* R CANDACE*COLE DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 04255 001-210-0000-2110 .23578 09/05/91 $10.72 00815 38255 80.00 09/12/91 04494 $413.10 23578 03237 38256 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 80.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHCS/AUG91 52498 00017 08/31/91 001-400-1121-4304 00427 CITY CLERK R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00447 LONG DISTANCE CHCS/AUG91 52498 08/31/91 CITY TREASURER R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00481 LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG9152498 08/31/91. .._ CITY MANAGER R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG91 52498 08/31/91 001-400-1202-4304 00493 FINANCE ADMIN COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00497 LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG91 52498 08/31/91 PERSONNEL R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1206-4304 00382 LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG91 52498 08/31/91 DATA PROCESSING R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1207-4304 00312 LONG DISTANCECHGS/AUG91 52498 08/31/91._._, BUS LICENSE.. R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG91 52498 00017 001-400-2101-4304 00874 08/31/91 POLICE R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00496 LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG91 52498 08/31/91 PLANNING . R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00511 LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG91 52498 08/31/91 PUB WKS ADMIN 8413. 10 $8.97 /TELEPHONE__. 814. 47 /TELEPHONE $2.65 /TELEPHONE..._ 824. 25 /TELEPHONE 830. 38 /TELEPHONE 824. 78 /TELEPHONE $2.89 /TELEPHONE__ __... $319.96 /TELEPHONE 826. 30 /TELEPHONE 868. 98 /TELEPHONE 552498 00816 38257 80.00 09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 80.00 09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 80.00 09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 80.00 09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 $0.00 09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 80.00 09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 ',$0.00 .09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 80.00 09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 80.00 09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 80.00 09/12/91 l • y • • n 611. 1 41. e f FINANCE--SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION L R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG91 52498 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG91 52498 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE CHGS/AUG91 52498 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00580 $54.84 08/31/91 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00182 $13.09 08/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00495 $49.43 08/31/91 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL********************-x***tr************ **** *************** ****** ** R BARBARA*CONKLIN REIMB BOOKS/TUIT/1991 PAGE 0005 DATE 09/12/91 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $640. 99 03929 001-400-4202-4316 00209 $551.95 08/28/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CONTINUING EDUC. OF THE BAR $551. 95 03606 001-400-1131-4201 00668 $108.84 249233 09377 PUBLICATIONS/CITY CLERK 49233 08/16/91 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $108. 84 952498 00816 38257 $0.00 09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 $0.00 09/12/91 552498 00816 38257 $0.00 09/12/91 02927 38258 $0.00 09/12/91 R COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL,SERVICES TESTING MATERIALS 4156A 03674 001-400-1203-4201 00793 $211.00 14158A 03006 08/21/91 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $211. 00 R THE*DAILY BREEZE MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 00642 001-400-1203-4201 00794 $156.31 392205-100 00819 5-100 08/31/91 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 s *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 62174 $136.31 01390 110-400-3302-4311 00727 $306.08 08/31/91 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & SHELTER COST/AUG 91 $306. 08 38259 09/12/91, 38260 09/12/91 38261 09/12/91 62176/62174 00820 38262 $0.00 09/12/91 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00166 $729.67 09/10/91 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 00014 38263 $0.00 09/12/91 -J J 0 J J .I • Alb TIP 410. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 PAGE 0006 DATE 09/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVG PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL ************************************************- ******************* R DIVE N' SURF MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 00604 001-400-2201-4309 95/94 08/31/91 FIRE $725.67 01135 $40.00 43695/94 00823 38264 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EASTMAN, INC. OFFICE SUPP/STOCK/AVG 91 98150 $40.00 02514 001-400-1208-4305 00952 $197.35 7876023/798150 00825 38265 08/31/91 _ GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS DISCOUNT OFFERED R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS DISCOUNT TAKEN R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO.PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 00165 001-202-0000-2021 00071 08/31/91 00165 001-202-0000-2022 00071 08/31/91 00165 001-400-2101-4311 01222 _.08/31/91 POLICE 00165 001-400-2201-4311 00399 08/31/91 FIRE 00165 001-400-3103-4311 00691 08/31/91 ST MAINTENANCE 00165 001-400-3104-4311 00075 08/31/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY 00165 001-400-4202-4311 00185 08/31/91 _ PUB WKS ADMIN__ 00165 001-400-4204-4311 00200 08/31/91 BLDG MAINT 00165 001-400-4205-4309 00582 08/31/91 EQUIP SERVICE 00165 001-400-4205-4310 00208 08/31/91 EQUIP SERVICE $197.35 $76.63 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $76. 63CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $1,424.34 /AUTO., MAINTENANCE $77.71 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $142.79 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $14.86 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $83.78 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $113.47 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $431.81 ./MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $250.66 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 _ ,.$0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 l .► J 0 I -0 0 • • • to. 41, 4.•• 4. FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:13:46 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R R R R R EDD/NGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH . . DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00165 001-400-4205-4311 00240 08/31/91 EQUIP SERVICE 00165 08/31/91 001-400-4601-4311 00122 COMM RESOURCES 00165 001-400-6101-4311 08/31/91 PARKS $203. 83 /AUTO MAINTENANCE $120. 11 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00257 $87. 23 /AUTO MAINTENANCE EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 105-400-2601-4311 00228 $32.09 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE _ EDDINGS BROTHERS AUTO PARTS 00165 110-400-3302-4311 00728 $772.36 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $3,755.04 PAGE 0007 DATE 09/12/91 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R EMERG MED SERV PERSONNEL FUND RECERT FEE/LICKHALTER 03372 001-400-2201-4316 08/27/91 FIRE 00306 $83.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R EMERG. MED SERV PERSONNEL FUND RECERT FEE/K. BRIDGES 03371 001-400-2201-4316 08/27/91 FIRE $85.00 00307 $85.00 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R STEVE*ENDOM MEALS/HOTEL/TASER CLASS 01034 001-400-2101-4316 09/09/91 POLICE $85.00 00775 $78.75 /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R RICHARD*EVANS $78.73 04246 001-210-0000-2110 04499 $100.00 23216 02396 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 23216 08/27/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***********************************************************m******** 00828 36267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 00828 38267 $0.00 09/12/91 11298 38268 $0.00 09/12/91 11297 38269 CI $0.00 09/12/91 02621 38270 $0.00 09/12/91 R EXECUTIVE—SUITE SERVICES INC. WAX FLOORS/POLICE DEPT 8-068 01294 08/28/91 $100. 00 001-400-4204-4201 00471 $135.00 1178-068 02929 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 38271 09/12/91 38272 09/12/91 .." aPi FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R FIRST WESTERN PEST CONTROL 04163 FUMIGATE PROSPECT BLDG 4467 08/08/91 PAGE 0008 DATE 09/12/91 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $135.00 305-400-8506-4201 00022 $1,366.00 CIP 86-506 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL**********************************•*******************************#** R RON*FOX MEALS/CNOA CONFERENCE 01007 001-400-2101-4313 00367 08/28/91 POLICE $1,366.00 $72.25 /TRAVEL EXPENSE,_ STC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R G S ENTERPRISES GRAFFITI REMOVER 2384 $72.25 04189 001-400-4204-4309 02089 $108.25 06/22/91 BLDG MAINT_ /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 09/01/91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 101-4304 00394 $108.25 $1.70 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00395 $7.15 09/01/91 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00425 $4.65 09/01/91 CITY CLERK _ /TELEPHONE.__. 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00426 $19.40 09/01/91 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00314 $2.45 09/01/91 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00315 $10.21 09/01/91 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00445 $4.65 09/01/91 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 00015 09/01/91 001-400-1141-4304 00446 $19.40 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 4467 02597 38273 $1,366.00 09/12/91 ' 02616 38274 $0.00 09/12/91 2384 02913 38275 $108.25 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 J • 1 u. • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 VND t# ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVO PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 09/01/91 00015 09/01/91 00015 09/01/91 00015 09/01/91 001-400-1201-4304 00479 CITY MANAGER 001-400-1201-4304 00480 CITY MANAGER 001-400-1202-4304 00491 FINANCE ADMIN 001-400-1202-4304 00492 FINANCE ADMIN 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00495 09/01/91 PERSONNEL 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00496 09/01/91 PERSONNEL 00015 09/01/91 00015 09/01/91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 00015 09/01/91 001-400-1206-4304 00380 DATA PROCESSING 001-400-1206-4304 00381 DATA PROCESSING 001-400-1207-4304 00310 BUS LICENSE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00311 09/01/91 BUS LICENSE 00015 09/01/91 00015 09/01/91 001-400-1208-4304 00155 GEN APPROP 001-400-1208-4304 00156 GEN APPROP 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00872 09/01/91 POLICE 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00873 09/01/91 POLICE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00363 09/01/91 FIRE • 33. 91 /TELEPHONE 316. 34 /TELEPHONE 314. 20 /TELEPHONE 359. 24 /TELEPHONE 35. 87 /TELEPHONE 324. 51 /TELEPHONE 3102. 76 /TELEPHONE 329. 62 /TELEPHONE 34. 65 /TELEPHONE 319. 40 /TELEPHONE 32. 45 /TELEPHONE 310. 21 /TELEPHONE 3401. 41 /TELEPHONE 3516. 40 /TELEPHONE 3211. 70 /TELEPHONE PAGE 0009 DATE 09/12/91 �) INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 318-0200 00932 38278 . 30.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 , 4.1 30.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 .J/ 30.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 30.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 30.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 30.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 .4) 30.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 •y 30.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 30.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 ►� 30.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 30.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 t$0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 30.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 r+ *0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 30.00 09/12/91 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 09/01/91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 DIRECT DIAL__CHGS/SEP_91.._-020009/01 /91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 09/01/91__ R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED DIRECT DIAL CHGS/SEP 91 -0200 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00364 09/01/91 FIRE 00015 09/01/91 00015 09/01/91 001-400-2401-4304 00394 ANIMAL CONTROL 001-400-2401-4304 00395 ANIMAL CONTROL 001-400-4101-4304 00494 PLANNING 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00495 09/01/91 PLANNING 00015 09/01/91 00015 09/01/91 00015 09/01/91 00015 09/01/91 00015 09/01/91 001-400-4201-4304 00450 BUILDING 001-400-4201-4304 00451 BUILDING 001-400-4202-4304 00509 PUB WKS ADMIN 001-400-4202-4304 00510 PUB WKS ADMIN 001-400-4204-4321 00591 BLDG MAINT .. 001-400-4601-4304 00578 COMM RESOURCES 001-400-4601-4304 00579 COMM RESOURCES._ 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00352 09/01/91 PARKS 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00353 09/01/91 PARKS 00015 09/01/91 110-400-3302-4304 00493 PARKING ENF $10. 21 /TELEPHONE $3. 43 /TELEPHONE $14. 30 /TELEPHONE $11. 75 /TELEPHONE $49. 02 /TELEPHONE_,. $18. 85 /TELEPHONE __• $78. 64 /TELEPHONE $103.47 /TELEPHONE $108. 26 /TELEPHONE PAGE 0010 DATE 09/12/91 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00931 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 $23.91 318-0200 00932 38278 /BUILDING.SAFETY/SECURIT $0.00 09/12/91 $55. 80 /TELEPHONE $29. 63 _/TELEPHONE _ $2. 45 /TELEPHONE $10. 21 /TELEPHONE $29. 37 /TELEPHONE 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 't$0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 00931 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 318-0200 00932 38278 $0.00 09/12/91 4, • , FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 FOR 09/12/91 DATE 09/12/91 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00494 $122.56 00931 39278 qi TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 09/01/91 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE 30.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL s++rat-nit*iHtarft******** t3Hr#it3t*********atnitit*nit#*ttitit*-tt****»-tt*it:tst-ttittHtst3tat 52, 164. 14 R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00193 $34,878.93 03009 38279 REIMB WORK COMP/AUG 91 08/31/91 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************************************.*** $34,878.93 R LORI*HIGGINS 03404 001-400-4601-4201 00971 $490.00 02886 38280 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 09/05/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL****************tt*************************************************** $490.00 R HPDUG 03272 001-400-1206-4315 00066 $25.00 09587 38281 DUES/STURGES/MORGAN 09/03/91 DATA PROCESSING /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $25. 00 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 02458 001-400-4204-4321 00592 3247.46 00874 38282 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *** * * * 1 $247.46 R INTERNATIONAL CONF OF BUILDING 00667 001-202-0000-2020 01278 $190.00 E00000 02209 38283 SEMINAR. REG/C. SWARTZ 00000 06/03/91 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $0.00 09/12/91 VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $190. 00 R .RIC*JENNINGS 04251 001-400-4601-4201 00972 $1,106.00 02885 38284 GRASS V—BALL TOURNEY DIR 09/05/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/12/91 VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ft JOHN*KEARIN MEALS/P. O.S. T. CLASS $1, 106. 00' 01032 001-400-2101-4312 01749 $85.25 02619 38285 09/04/91 POLICE #0.00 09/12/91 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0012 FOR 09/12/91 DATE 09/12/91 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R KATHLEEN*LEACHMAN TYPESET. FALL BROCHURE $85.25 01409 001-400-4601-4302 00162 $625.00 09/10/91 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $625. 00 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 02846 38286 $625.00 09/12/91 R STUART*LEVCHENKO 04252 001-400-4601-4201 00968 $105.00 02887 38287 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 09/05/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $105.00 R LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION 03313 001-400-4201-4316 00259 $60.00 02250 38288 REG/W. GROVE 09/09/91 BUILDING /TRAINING $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $60. 00 R LINDA*LOCKE 02632 001-400-4601-4201 00969 $563.50 02889 38289 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 09/05/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $563.50 R LOS ANGELES AIR CONDITIONING 02764 001-400-4204-4201 00472 $242.50 12853 02935 38290 ' EMERG REPAIRS/C CTR 12853 08/29/91 BLDG MAINT /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $242. 50 R COUNTY OF*LOS ANGELES 01896 001-400-2201-4316 00308 $425.00 11296 38291 RECERT FEES/3 PARAMEDICS_._ 08/21/91_ FIRE /TRAINING ___._.. .,_. __.. $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $425.00 R LOS ANGELES COUNTY TAX COLL.00589 305-400-8604-4201 00013 $488.00 911001 02926 38292 ANNUAL HEALTH LICENSE 11001 ._ .07/01/91 _ ._ _ CIP 86-604 . _/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT.. $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $488.00 R LOS ANGELES TIMES 00213 001-400-1203-4201 00795 $715.22 35-009745 00640 38293 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91.._09745_ _08/31/91 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT _.SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/12/91 • t. • • IP J' CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0013 TIME 15:15:46 FOR 09/12/91 DATE 09/12/91 .1, PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTIQN AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP J' v *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $715.22 R ERNIE*rIALDANADO 04248 001-300-0000-3841 00352 $37.50 02500 38294 REIMB TOW FEES 09/03/91 /POLICE TOWING $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $37. 50 R CITY OF *MANHATTAN BEACH 00183 305-202-0000-2020 00027 $666.94 8671 02044 38295 SLURRY SEAL BOUNDRY PL. 8671 06/30/91 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - $0.00 09/12/91 R CITY OF *MANHATTAN BEACH 00183 305-400-8170-4201 00017 $239.30 8671 02044 38295 -V SLURRY SEAL BOUNDRY PL. 8671 06/30/91 CIP 87-170 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT `b0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $906.24 I R STEVE*MC COY 1 04244 001-210-0000-2110 04498 $50.00 21638 03236 38296 -)) FORFEIT FEE REFUND 21638 09/05/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 ay, R DEAN*MENART PER DIEM ADVANCE I TR379 02625 170-400-2103-4316 00008 $72.25 09/10/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R KURT*MICHEL PER DIEM ADVANCE $72. 25 TR379 00379 38297 $0.00 09/12/91 02719 170-400-2103-4316 00007 $72.25 TR378 00378 38298 $0.00 09/12/91 TR378 09/10/91 SPEC INVESTGTNS /TRAINING *** VENDOR TOTAL****************************************at*************************** R VALERIE*MOHLER REIMB MATERIALS/FALL 91 $72. 25 00956 001-400-1202-4316 00380 $29.99 02718 38299 09/10/91 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 10.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $29. 99 R MOORE RECREATION & PARKS EQUIP 01406 001-400-6101-4309 01106 $285.63 6374 02910 38300 BASKETBALL NETS/HOOKS 6374 08/16/91 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $285.63 09/12/91 • FINANCE- SF-(,3.'Ir) TIME 15:15:46 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 PAGE 0014 DATE 09/12/91 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRW # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DE_SCR_IPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $285.63 R NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC 00399 001-400-4201-4315 00107 $75.00 ANNUAL DUES/W. GROVE 57927 09/04/91 BUILDING /MEMBERSHIP *** VENDOR TOTAL ********aHt- *********tray********nir**********- attr**** *ar t#ff************* $75.00 M557927 02248 $0.00 36301 09/12/91 R NEW PACIFIC LUMBER CO. 00606 160-400-3102-4309 00630 $91.97 00849 36302 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $91.97 R OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 00093 705-400-1210-4324 00066 $288.55 12465 0245 38303 REP JEEP BUMPER/POLICE __,12465_,___.,. 09/09/91 ____AUTO/PROP/BONDS/CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $288.55 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $288. 55 R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 00321 001-400-2101-4304 00875 $2.07 00036 38304 COMPUTER HOOKUPS/SEP 91 09/01 /91 ._ _ POLICE_ _/TELEPHONE $0.00 CP/12/91 *-x* VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2.07 R PEP BOYS 00608 001-400-2101-4311 01220 $54.11 15776 00953 38305 MISC. CHARGES/SEP 91____._ 15778 .__....09/05/91..__ POLICE . _/AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/12/91 4-** VENDOR TOTAL********************************4*********************************** $54.11 R PHOENIX GROUP 02530 001-400-1206-4201 00834 $600.00 5467 00071 38306 QTRLY SOFTWARE MAINZ-/PKG 5467 09/01/91 DATA PROCESSING__/CONTRACTSERVICE/PRIVAT _ $0.00 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************.x*******:w***$************************************* $600.00 PROFESSIONAL EQUIPMENT 04212 001-400-4201—x,05 00702 $25.45 109361-1 02243 30307 BUILDING__INEP TESTOR 361-1 08/28/91 ..,._., BUILDING.__ ._._/OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES _._ $25.45 09/12/91 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R RADIO SHACK MISC. CHARGES/SEP 91 $25.45 01429 007.--400-3104-4309 00732 $47.77 _.09/10/91....__ .TRAFFIC SAFETY 'MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00'755 38308 $0.00 09/12/R1.' J 1 i J • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 RAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R RADIO SHACK MISC. CHARGES/SEP 91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH__ DEMAND LIST FOR 09/12/91 VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01429 09/10/91 PAGE 0015 DATE 09/12/91 % INV/REF ('U 1 ;:H;k # AMOUNT UNEN,: DA i E 'LW 001-400-4204-4309 02090 133.66 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATEFIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*#-rr*************»•u*********at********i,tr*u*at**********-n*********** r*** PAINCOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 R RAINBOW CAMERA & VIDEO MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 00173 001-400-2101-4306 01035 08/31/91 POLICE 00173 08/31/91 00173 08/31/91 001-400-4101-4305 00565 PLANNING 001-400-4202-4305 00620 PUB WKS ADMIN 00173 305-400-8144-4201 00005 08/31/91 CIP 90-144 00173 08/31/91 705-400-1209-4305 00055 LIABILITY INS $51. 43 $355. 32 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE $86.03 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $57.35 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $29.30 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 414. 33 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES ''rNUmR TOTAL_ ******************************************************.n*..n*********** 4542.33 R REDONDO VACUUM & JANITORIAL 2 VACUUMS/FIRE DEPT 33730 02375 001-400-2201-5401 08/29/91 FIRE 00055 4432.89 /EQUIP—LESS THAN 4500 M.** VENDOR TOTAL************************************i,*****-I s*********************** $432.89 *** * * * R SCOTT*ROBINSON HONDA, INC. REPAIR POLICE VEHICLE 55636 VENDOR TOTAL 02145 001-400-2101-4311 01219 08/23/91 POLICE $80.74 /AUTO MAINTENANCE ******************************************************************** 4E.0.74 THOMAS*RYAN WORK GUARANTEE REFUND VENDOR TOTAL ****=, 04254 001--210--0000-2110 9265 09/05/91 04496 $1,600.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE ********************************************************nye**** R SUSAN*SAXE—CLIFFORD,PH D PSYCH EVAL/DISPATCHER 829-3 008:39 08/,_'9/91 41,600.00 00955 38308 $0.00 09/12/91 00856 38:209 $0.00 09/12/91 00856 38309 40. 00 09/12/91 0085L• L87109 40.00 07/12;91 ,91 00856 38309 $0.00 09/12/91 00856 38309 09/12/91 J 33730 11295 38310 es $432.99 09/12/91 55636 02498 $186.00 9265 032:35 40. 00 001-400-1203-4320 00385 $275.00 1-0829--.` 03007 PERSONNEL /PRE—EMPLOYMENT EXAMS !0.00 38311 09/12/91 38.312 09/12/91 . - 38313 3?/t2/91 s 112. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 15:15:46 VENDOR NAME rF7CRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0016 FOR 09/12/91 DATE 09/12/91 VND 4 AccuuNr NUNDER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF # DATE INVC PPOJ 1 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNEH'.... *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $275.00 * * * R SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 00151 001-202-0000-2020 01279 $1.250.00 '/0C3! •-• •;.21(.:; .1. 38314 ; 's CAL ID CHARGES/FY 91 90031 08/07/.21 /ACCOUNTS PAYABLE • R SHER1FF'S 0.FPARTMENT 00151 001-202-0000-2020 01280 $2,446.48 90107 03103 26314 Ju -11r 'TEN/FY91 90107 08/07/51 /ACCOUNT' PAYABLE $0.00 09/12/91 VENDOR TOTAL ********************************************************** 7, 696. SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-2101-1205 01580 $633. 26 94'37 C.2 w4-719US POLICE FORMS 9497 . 08/23/91 POLIE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR F0 AL *i.,i,,,*.,*-:;************************************************** 4633. 26 * * * R SMART ? FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-2101-4306 01036 $90.22 521 001560 38316 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 29668 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 09/12/91 vFl!OR Uji,fk_ *********************************************************** $90.22 R SMITH GRAPHICS 04188 001-400-2201-4305 00488 $174.07 VEHICLE ID PLACARDS/FIRE 6:133 OC/20/91 FIRE 6533 11291 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $174.72 VENDOR TOTAL *****************************************4g********************** $174.07 38317 09/12/91 RZOUTH FAY FIFE EXTINGUISHER 00113 001-400-2201-A309 01194 5116.91 14056/57 00861 36-31 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 56/57 _ 08/31/91 FIRE iNAINIENANCLI MATERIALS T0. 00 09/12/91 VENDOR TOTAL ****************4t*********************************** .-ICUTH BAY NOTICING AND 03882 0(.1-400-101-1201 00109 $690.00 91HERO9A 00'37) MISC. CHARGES/SFP 91 ERO9A 09/051 PLANNING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL ****************************************************** R SOUTHERN CALIFG1iNIA GAS CO. 00170 001-400-4204-4203 00,1F17; $390.26 GAS BILLINGS/AUG 91 08/31/91 13LE NAIN1 /UTILITIES 00864 3832,? 40.00 0. J J J J J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0017 TIME 15:15:46 FOR 09/12/91 DATE 09/12/91 , RAY VENC?UR NAMEVND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN S AMOUNT INV/REF PO It CHK1 6 5 bESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE: EXF• 5 0 9 10 0 *** VENDOR TOTAL •>tx-tt*****itit***Brie*itarit•trarar•n•tett*4n•et***er r•tf•ttit•itarir•x•tt•tt•trir•tt•tr*at****trisat••tt•p•tt•****irte*** $390.26 ,1 9 ,2 - ,3 -,c.--- . 11 R SPARJSLETTS DRINKING WATER CORP 00146 001-400-4601-4305 009133 $90.86 745255 00033 38327. 14 12 WATER COOLER RENT/AUG 91 45255 08/31/91 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 40.00 09/12/91 v 13 17 14 *** VENDOR TOTAL -tri• •a►•»ait•ritari►aritu•tr+r***rarer*•r•t►tr•n+►+ ****•x•n#ar•tttr***Haritar•piti►•u•n•ttarn•p•tt•»it•ari►it•ttitit•u** $90.86 0 15 10 ,, 21 17 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 001-400-3103-4201 00350 $3,106.00 2716 00027 38322 _, •. SWEEPING SERV/AUG 91 2716 08/31/91 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/12/91 :4 •'5 R SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE CO 00115 109-400-3301-4201 00063 $3,837.00 2716 00027 38322 26 z) L1 SWEEPING SERV/AUG 91 2716 08/31/91 VEH PKG DIST /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/12/91 n 22 25 30 23 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************tr*********************** . $6,943.00 31 24 32 25 33 J. R JE.*TALLERICO 04247 001-400-1206-4201 00883 $8000 38 09585 38323 1 5. 535 27 COMPUTER SERV/AUGUST 91 38 08/19/91 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/12/91 ?c 20 37 70 29 *** VENDOR TOTAL,******************************************************************** $80.00 39 30 40 J, 41 3z' R TASERTRON 04249 001-400-2101-4316 00777 $205.00 02622 38324 G;' 33 TUITION/S. ENDOM 09/09/91 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 09/12/91 44 34 4', cc 35 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $205.00 47 6 40 3 7 41 39 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-202-0000-2021 00072 $103.18 00870 38325 . ,v 39 DISCOUNT OFFERED 08/31/91 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 09/12/91 40 41 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-202-0000-2022 00072 $103.18CR 00870 38325 42 DISCOUNT TAKEN" 08/31/91 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN ,$0.00 09/12/91 5 !-. 43 44 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2101-4309 00442 $7.86 00870 38325 45 MISC...CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 POLICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/12/91 57 s� '' 47 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2201-4309 01136 $31.94 00870 38325 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/12/91 5. 5? 49 so R TRIANGLE "HARDWARE 00123 001-400-2401-4309 0017.6 $69.03 00870 38325 51 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 ANIMAL CONTROL /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/12/91 , ,, ,� 52 53 54 70 71 72 55 50 S 13 )75 r4,1 rl rJ MIL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 3 ,26 rINAML—bfrAJ40 DEMAND LIST PAGE •0018 TIME 15:15:46 FOR 09/12/91 DATE 09/12/91 ° 5 6 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNF_NC DATE EXP L 7 ° R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-3101-4309 00107 $84.92 00870 38325 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 MEDIANS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS_____, $0.00_09/12/91._ 1. 11R I2 ____. TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-3103-4309 01217 $53.55 00000 38325 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/12/91 13 ,14 ,5 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-3104-4309 00733 $97.33 008.70 38323 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/12/91 IG '7 i° R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-4204-4309 • 02092 $329.08 00870 38325 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/12/91 ,20 21 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 001-400-6101-4309 01107 $69.12 00870 38325 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 2' 24 $0.00 09/12/91 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 103-400-2601-4309 00731 $86.57 00870 38325 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/12/91j 2'. 27 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 110-400-3302-4309 00791 $44.05 00870 38325 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 211 29 '0 $0._00_____09./12/91_- R TRIANGLE HARDWARE '00123 160-400-3102-4309 00631 $24.25 00870 38325 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 31 32 33 09/12/91 R TRIANGLE HARDWARE 00123 305-400-8506-4309 00034 $30.93 00870 38325 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 CIP 86-506 /MAINTENANCE 34 15 MATERIALS $0.00 09/12/91_ *** VENDOR TOTAL a t+H►crit•raH►ar*iHritarit*• •uat*atar-it•x*****+rata►#•ir**** r****a►+t+r**ar-a-n**arnat*star*****natitat $928. 63 37 30 39 R RALPH*TURKOLU 03239 001-210-0000-2110 04495 $30.00 24625 03234 38326 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 24625 09/05/91 /DEEOSISS/WORv 40 41 42 GUARANTEE $0,_0Q__09/12'491_. *** VENDOR TOTAL****ar********************************•******************************.* 350.00 43 44 A5 R VACATION INN 03254 001-400-2101-4312 01748 $193.17 02620 38327 HOTEL/J. KEARIN Q9/04/91 POLICE /TRAVELEXPENSE 46 47 48 $ POST $0.00 09/12/91._,' *** VENDOR TOTAL a tar****n**********************u******w***.»***at***at.***.x***•k*********** $193. 17 c 45 50 S1 R ELAINE .M.*WEINER 03375 001-400-4601-4201 00970 $907.20 02888 38328 ' SUMMER CLASS INS.TRUCLOR Q9/05[51 COMM RE5OVRCE5_LCONTRA.T 52 SERY_ICE/PRIYAT $0.00 09112/_x': 53 :a 7 55 V7 6 s 9 ° 0 4J ) 6) ..i J J J J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 r at'n,w—Qrm..2-ry DEMAND LIST PAGE 0019 '1 TIME 15:15:46 FOR 09/12/91 DATE 09/12/911 5 6 PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 7 7 a IA 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 4907.20 1, 12 R TRICIA*WICKERS 04253 001-210-0000-2110 04497 $50.00 24633 03233 38329 ,5 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 24633 09/05/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00 09/12/91 , 14' *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 151 16 117 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** 490,869.23 19 [2='*** 2' TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $529,557.64 2f. 27 23 24 31 it 2... 25 27 t i? 2'J 29 3' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WAR ?Ar?TS LISTED ON PA TO 19 INCl IISIVF, , 37 31 32 QF C__-�i WARRANT REGISTER FOR ARE ACCURATE, '� • FUNDS ARE AVAIi ABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND al21i4U-CONF.ORMANGE .13 34 35 6� TO TH BpDGET •LI�� .: n 37 m FINANCE DIRECTOR -,, DATE 41 42 . 43 45 47 r.? 49 SO 51 �'r '&&p'T LL ,7 ,..1 52 53 54 a 7,' 2 55 I�se L,7 va J A r CITY OF HERMOSi BEACH 2 3 `,15 r inim—rm34v DEMAND LISTN TIME 11:36:33 FOR 09/19/91 DATE 0001 DATE 09/19/91 ; B 4 6 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 7 e l'''J' H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00439 *321,166.17 38330 PAYROLL/9-1 TO 9-15-91 09/18/91 /ACCRUED PAYROLL_-________ $0.00_09/18/91_ Y ,l _. 4 n: 11 *** VENDOR TOTAL #+t ?r #***** rites**** ***** t* ***** ********* **4****** ir**** at *at *321,166.17 *** PAY CODE TOTAL***••*****************•b•******************************************** *321,166.17 to 20 zi 22 2.3 24 zi JB e" R A & E TROPHIES 02744 001-400-4601-4308 00591 *30.31 10163 00082 38396 18 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 10163 08/31/91 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS *0.00 0!(18/9 u L 25 *** VENDOR TOTAL **************************************************** ti*************it* *30.31 2zi 22 R ALL AMERICAN RADIATOR ,z 04077 105-400-2601-4311 00231 *313.93 3994 02516 38397 24 RADIATOR SERV/ST LITES 3994 08/12/91 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE *.Q_pO 09/18/91 2l 30 3, 'J ,3 3.1 35 36 2c *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *313.93 2'7 2 0 23 R ASPHALT MAINTENANCE COMPANY 04160 305-400-8170-4201 00020 *140,183.77 70 02923 38398 SLURRY SEAL/JULY 91 70 08/20/91 CIP 87-170 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 09/18/91 37 38 30 40 4, 3 44 31 32 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************�r****************************************************** *140,183.77 33 34 R BEACH CITIES SYMPHONY ASSOC 01717 001-400-4601-4201 00979 *250.00 02895 38399 36 CONTRACT PMT/FY 91-92 09/10/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 09/18/91 :6„ 40 x `i, 37 38 *4* VENDOR TOTAL******'************************************************************* *250.00 4052 41 R BEACH TRAVEL 00292 001-400-2101-4313 00369 *298.00 02629 38400 a2 AIRFARE/J. CARUSO 09/16/91 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *0.00 09/18/91 51 54 ” 43 44 *** VENDOR TOTAL fr******************************************************************* $298.00 45 y 57 50 59 614 6 47 R JEROME*BELSKY 04265 110-30014000-3302 41783 *18.00 1900849 03303 38401 4e CITATION PAYMENT REFUND 00849 09/10/91 /COURT FINES/PARKING *0.00 09/18/91 61 63 6. 65 66 67 s 4'3 50 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** . *18.00 51 ,yS 52 /1 53 R BETA GROUP 00437 001-400-1206-4315 00068 *200.00 09584 38402 ANNUAL DUES/M. STURGES 09/09/91 DATA PROCESSING /MEMBERSHIP *0.00 09/18/91 6u 6J 7C 71S4 72 74 14 ' r..f. V J V 0 J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 11:36:33 DEMAND LIST 0 PAGE 0002 21 J 0 J 4) 4 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # ;DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL iter*************tit•*************************************************** $200.00 ;n „ I" l R BLICKMAN, INC. 03092 001-400-4601-4201 00983 191.00 02891 38403 THEATRE TECH/8-4/8-13 09/09/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 10.00 09/18/91 13 4 +- is— --- — --- *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $91.00 n ,3 zc mi R BROOKS PRODUCTS 00136 001-400-3104-4309 00737 1154.80 9677 02904 38404 1,,, ELECTRICAL BOXES 9677 08/28/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1154.80 09/18/91 F.-, z, 22 24 " R BROOKS PRODUCTS 00136 109-400-2601-4309 00733 1154.80 9677 02904 38404 ELECTRICAL BOXES 9677 08/28/91 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1154.80 09/18/91 2r, 27 ,, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ' 1309.60 2 4 .r. 3, 32 • • R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1122-4305 00127 161.03 03241 38405 REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 ELECTIONS /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10.00 09/18/91 34 —__ R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1202-4309 00403 10.75 03241 38405 3`- REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10.00 09/18/91 L'' 37 3'J 40 3, R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-1205-4316 00075 $10.00 03241 38405 -- _ — REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 CABLE TV /TRAINING 10.00 09/18/91 2 44 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2101-4306 01043 119.32 03241 38403 REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 10.00 09/18/91 a, 47 4„ R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2101-4316 00781 $50.945, 03241 38405 , REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 09/18/91 ;, ++ R GARY*DRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2201-4305 00493 $19.80 03241 38405 42 REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10.00 09/18/9143 _ 566 v. M R GARY*DRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2201-4309 01145 $10.90 03241 38405 5 REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 09/18/91 v ,if' 6,- u • 47 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-2201-4311 00401 14.33 03241 38403 as REIMD PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 FIRE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/18/91 5, cz 63 ?- 49 A CITY TREASURER 02016 . GARY*DRUTSCH, 001-400-4101-4305 00570 110.72 03241 38405u 5, REIMD PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 10.00 09/18/91 L•• 60 52 53 54 n ], 72 J 0 J 4) CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH • 2 3 "2'., `5 rirvnrv-.c—rHswPAGE 0003u DEMAND LIST _, TIME 11:36:33 FOR 09/19/91 DATE 09/19/91 2 C ] PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP v 4 5 7 n 0 r e R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4204-4309 02101 $21.77 03241 38405 REIMS PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS tO " $0.00-___09/18/91_!? R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4601-4308 00590 $5.79 03241 38405 REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 09/18/91 13 14 13 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-4601-4316 00168 $6.00 03241 38405 REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 COMM RESOURCES /TRAINING $0.00 09/18/91 '6 '7 18 ,9 ,s ] R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 001-400-6101-4311 00259 $12.12 03241 38405 REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16 09/16/91 PARKS /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 Zo zi 222 24 3 15 . 21 09/1.8/91 R GARY*BRUTSCH, CITY TREASURER 02016 105-400-2601-4309 00734 $29. 74 03241 38405 REIMB PETTY CASH/TO 9-16• 09/16/91 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/18/91 24 25 26 27 '1 *** VENDOR TOTAL *****•u•• iritatir•p•ar*at•a•aterarar*it•n*ir****ar•n••ririr*rar•ir*irirar•»******** **************** $259. 21 23 y' 31 2s s 27 a, 31 R C. P. P. A. 03329 110-400-3302-4315 00045 $100.00 34 01695 38406 3i DUES/STATEN/HITE 09/16/91 213 PARKING ENF /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 30U _09/18/91_4 37 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00 33 33 31 32 33 41 R CA MUNICIPAL BUS TAX ASSN INC. 00382 001-400-1207-4316 00084 $40.00 42 11085 38407 ANNUAL DUES/M. FEHSKEN$ 09/12/91 sa BUS LICENSE /TRAINING $0.00 09/18/91 t4 -15 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $40.00 u 47 37 38 33 4 3 V. R CALIF MUNICIPAL BUS TAX ASSOC. - 00530 001-400-1207-4317 00042 $90.00 TR382 00382 38408 REGISTRATION/M. FEHSKENS TR382 09/16/91 BUS LICENSE /CONFERENCE EXPENSE 40 4' $0.00 09/18/91 ''2 53 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $90.00 54 s: 43 44 45 5/1 R MARY*CAMACHO 04261 001-300-0000-3841 00355 $37.50sa REFUND TOWING FEE 09/10/91 /POLICE TOWING 031110.7/18/ ,,;, 46 47 m 60. po oq/18/91_== 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************�FiE'********************at* Cz 637. 50 L3 C3 s0 " R MONA JEAN*CEDAR 03159 001-400-4601-4201 00986 $353.50 02899 38410 `6,, 'SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 09/12/91 COMM RES RCE, /CQIIRACT s2 SSRVIC.EC1YAT $0.00_0 LIB/91 - s3• 54 n s3 ]C 71 I 55 lC5 F 72 74 75 4,10 ear O w CITY"OF HERMOSA BEACH r �,^ 4.• r ANANUM—W-A-J4U DEMAND LIST PAGE 0004 TIME 11:36:33 FOR 09/19/91 DATE 09/19/91 1 � s 6 e PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # ----CHK-ii---- DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD IS ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP y *** VENDOR TOTAL***********iratiruiririrara►irtritirtr+tare►ir�r*erariririti►*iter*iritaru*irarerirarirxarir**4ratarararit*era** $353. 50 13 14 ,5 1 !" 19 Zn 12 R CERTIFIED OFFICE EQUIPMENT 00389 110-400-3302-4305 00820 $8.61 4297 00811 38411 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 4297 08/31/91 PARKING ENF /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/18/91 1 5 — — *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $8.61 is 17 - R DANIEL FREEMAN LAX MED. CLINIC 02390 001-400-1203-4320 00388 $570.00 001291-00 03012 38412 EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS/AUG91 91-00 09/02/91 PERSONNEL /PRE—EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 09/18/91 z, ?; ;,4 25 2G ,n , 31 32 1,, L2 *** VENDOR TOTAL ***************************************************** ************** $570.00 r =3I R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00795 8458.19 006M43739 00826 38413 •4 IBM COPIER METER USE/JUL 43739 09/01/91 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 ,i5 R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00796 $283.00 006M43739 00826 38413 27 IBM COPIER MAINT/AUG 91 43739 09/01/91 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 33 3.1 35 m 3! .39 39 40 �- ;29 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $741.19 3p 3, 41 R EASTMAN, INC. 02514 001-400-1208-4305 00955 $463.83 00825 38414 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 09/18/91 44 34 ' 45 35 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $463.63 4r 3, 47 37 43 38 R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00151 $2,028.27 0268 00727 38415 550 1 5, 19 MISC. CHARGES/JULY 91 0268 07/31/91 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING $0.00 09/18/91 52 40 53 s4 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,028.2755 42 50 41 R FINANCIAL'PLAZA HILTON 04259 001-400-1207-4317 00041 $192.93 TR382 00382 3841658 44 59 45 HOTEL/M. FEHSKENS TR382 09/16/91 BUS LICENSE /CONFERENCE EXPENSE $0.00 09/18/91_ 'n 40 • 47 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************************$192.9363 48 c3 w 49 rs R JEFF*FLYNN 03407 001-210-0000-2110 04508 $2.475.00 9329 03243 38417 c, WORK GUARANTEE REFUND ..9329 09/18/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 09/18/91 Go F.' 52 53 _ 70 54 71 22 79 9 J J V 0 0 J J V O r CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2 r Lt 1i .c—arAowu DEMAND LIST PAGE 0005 TIME 11:36:33 FOR 09/19/91 DATE 09/19/91 1 4 5 6 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 5 ° 7 a 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL ********************•****************************************n****** $2,475.00 9 i r.. R W. W. *GRAINGER 01310 160-400-3102-4309 00635 $113.89 445-723418-7 02925 38418 SWITCHES/SEWER PUMP 418-7 08/27/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 13 14 ,s $113.89 09/16/91 1 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $113.89 ,5 16 17 1° ,0 :G 6 17 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00366 $116.78 00931 38419 ° TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 09/01/91 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE $0.00 09/1B/91 21 .-2 24 25 26 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2101-4304 00881 $136.20 00931 38419 2, 21 TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 09/01/91 POLICt /TELEPHONE $0.QQ 09/38/9j_23 24 Z3 R GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00398 $17.94 00931 38419 30 `" TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 09/01/91 ANIMAL CONTROL /TELEPHONE $0 QQ 0sLl8(S.L_. 33 2= R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00499$65.77 00931 38419 ., TELE CHARGES/SEP 91 09/01/91 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE $000 :° Q9L18/.9 L_ 37 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 3° $336. 69 3, 30 40 31 91 32R HARBOR CITY ENTERPRISES, INC. 03571 001-400-2101-4311 01228 $112.18 26758 00976 38420 4 433 73 MISC. CHARGES/SEPT 91 26758 09/15/91 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 34 $0.00 09/18/91 44 35 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $112.18 .4, 36 40 4 11 3 R MELISSA*HARRED v, 3° 02785 001-400-4601-4201 00989 $225.00 02892 38421 51 3" THEATRE TECH/8-14 TO 17 09/09/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICELPRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 4<, *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $225.00 42 .- ..7 1.4 �' •J. .23 4" R HERM BEACH COORDINATING COUNC. 01220 001-400-4601-4201 00978 $500.00 02896 38422 45 CONTRACT PMT/FY 91-92 09/10/91 COMM RESOU80ES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ., 46 $0.00 07[18/91_,T *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************44********************* $500.00 ae Li l2 c3 r 50 R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH 04075 705-106-0000-1104 00021 $20,000.00 03013 38423 51 'INCREASE WORK COl1P ACCT. 09/09/91 /DSPD5_II_IL4R_5_COMP CLAIMS 65 GI, 6, $0,.90 0911$49L 53 54 ,o 72 72 f 15G '9• _ 3 74 t5 -I ✓ 1 0 W ✓ 4. O• CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -? 34 `75 v30 rInimm-c—arn44u DEMAND LIST PAGE 0006 TIME 11:36:33 FOR 09/19/91 DATE 09/19/91 , c PAY VENDOR NAME VND 4$ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN i# AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 5 DESCRIPTION DATE INVG PROJ it ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP v . e • a 9 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL *****itch•********************************stir*************************** n $20.000. 00 11 . 11 12 3 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-2101-4311 01229 $172.00 1371 00836 38424 14 ,5 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 1371 08/31/91 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/18/91 17 '+4 R HERMOSA CAR WASH 4 00065 001-400-4201-4311 00258 $12.00 1371 00836 38424 to 16 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 1371 08/31/91 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/18/91 20 i s 2, R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 001-400-4202-4311 00187 814.00 1371 00836 38424 ; 15 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 1371 08/31/91 PUB WKS ADMIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 09/18/91 :4 19 25 2, R HERMOSA CAR WASH 00065 110-400-3302-4311 00731 $4.00 1371 00836 38424ILI;; + MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 • 1371 08/31/91 PARKING ENF /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0. 0009/18/91:s 2) *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** , $202.00 30 24 3, 37 25 31 R HEWLETT—PACKARD COMPANY 00149 001-400-1206-4201 00887 81.395.00 62A1M47 00009 38425 34 21 _—_ COMPUTER SYS MAINT/SEP91 A1M47 09/01/91 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 -1,• ,21 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 81.395.00 3A. =_0 3a 3, "• R VERONICA*HORTON 04264 001-400-4601-4201 00985 $98.00 02898 38426 41 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 09/11/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 �o' 0' *** VENDOR TOTAL **************** * 4nn *************************************************** $98.00 4' 411 37 49 R JOBS AVAILABLE 01165 001-400-1203-4201 00799 8109.20 117034 03004 38427 '� 3, EMPLOYEE ADS/PERSONNEL 17034 08/26/91 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 j,. 47 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $109.20 42 5, f 43 5] 44 R KARA*KLINE 04263 001-300-0000-3418 00251 830.00 02883 38428 45 V—BALL TOURNEY REFUND ` 09/05/91 /SPECIAL 46 EVENTS $0.00 09/18/91 a; c, 47 *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************#a�'********************** $30.00 c. 4p GI 4 49 a C1, 50 R SHERRIA*LAWRENCE 03044 001-400-1207-4316 00083 - 848.39 11084 38429 , .. REMB BOOKS/FALL 91 09/12/91 BUS LICENSE /TRAINING 80.00 09/18/91 58 52 n 70 53 70 54 7, 72 =5 � 73 5G 71 -,! J .J J 0 410 J J Q • 7.. a.. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (' FINANCE—SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0007 '1 = TIME 11:36:33 FOR 09/19/91 DATE 09/19/91 '14 v PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 5 , DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP , S 0 7 9 ##* VENDOR TOTAL **ataratarar*a►-»*ar*'rat*at*#a►ita'n*it**a►at*ata►•na'n'ira►'watir*'rat'i►eta►*ira►i►*+ra►*it*at*ar*ita►itar*j►*n #48.39 11 __ 1 ] 14 R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 02505 001-400-4101-4316 00230 $218.42 19617/1/3 01936 38430 1s •• PUBLICATIONS/PLANNING 17/18 08/27/91 PLANNING /TRAINING $218.42 09/16/91 15 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $218.42 ,, 21 R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-2201-4309 01143 $12.41 00837 38431 2,2 7 23 to MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 07/18/91 24 .6 ,�� R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-3103-4309 01219 825.43 00837 38431 2, 21 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 06/31/91 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0,00 09/18/91 ." 29 3) . •'3 R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 001-400-4204-4309 02100 $12.63 00637 38431 31 22 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 06/31/91 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 Q91113/.31—" 25. 5 R LEARNED LUMBER 00167 305-400-8906-4309 00037 $383.19 00837 38431 ; MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 CIP 86-506 /MAINLEN5NCE MATERIALS $0 00 07/18/91_.-. a 3, *** VENDOR TOTAL at******************************************************************* 3' 2' $433. 62 _, 30 40 31 41 R LOMITA BLUEPRINT SERVICE, INC. 00077 001-400-4202-4305 00623 $28.79 279853 00839 38432 .,, 33. MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 79853 08/31/71 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0,00 07/_181.91_L° 34 , 5 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $28.79 3•J 3' 4, R LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER 02906 001-400-4101-4305 00569 $63.00 01938 38433 „ 39 C.U.P. RECORDING FEES 09/04/91 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER $UPPLIES $0.00 09/18/91__ 40 41 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $63.00 55 42 r 43 ,) 4 R KENNETH A.*MEER5AND 04138 001-400-1132-4201 00088 $1,912.50 03107 38434 „ 45 LEGAL SERV/AUG 91 08/21/91 OTY_PR_OSECUIOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0,Q0 07/18/91_f0 4G 04 C2 47 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************#********************** $1,912.90 63 64 49 6'i GC. 5° R NANCY*MORRIS 04266 001-210-0000-2110 04505 $50.00 23774 03240 38435 67 51 ' ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 23774 09/12/71 /pFEQ$.II L IQRK GUARANTEE $0._90 07/18/_91___!'l 52G9 53 ,o ,1 54 72 55 t ;.) 56 ,4 79 so .y ..r t,y .,r 5 u 0 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA34O PAGE I' TIME 11:36:33 9/9 FOR 09/19/91 DATE 09/19/911 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO $ CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE 1NVC PROD $ ACCOUNT, DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 7 P y 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL*************•******•********************************i **************** $50.00 :7 n , R PATRICK*MURRAY 04260 001-300-0000-3841 00354 $35.00 03112 38436 14 is REFUND TOWING FEES 09/10/91 /POLICE TOWING $0.00 09/18/91_ 15 R PATRICK*MURRAY 04260 110-400-3302-4201 00293 $93.00 03112 38436 REFUND TOWING FEES 09/10/91 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 hq 1a xi 15 „ *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************it*******it*•n*******•n******* $128.00 I: zi zz 4 .-31 R NATOA 03384 001-400-1205-4315 00042 $200.00 02890 38437 I'6 1 DUES/W. CARTER 09/09/91. CABLE TV /MEMBERSHIP 30.00 09/18/91 ;' 123 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $200.00 74 3c 31 32 5 R NCTOA 01169 001-400-2101-4313 00370 $69.73 02628 38438 ,1 REGISTRATION/J. CARUSO . 09/16/91 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC $0.00 09/18/91 3 15 :' ;23 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $69.73 31 1r e 40 31 41 z R RON*PONCIANO 02967 001-400-4601-4201 00988 3616.00 03502 38439 4? n1 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 09/12/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 ;•14 -3'..*** VENDOR TOTAL*•*******************************************************************$616.004, 4) .9 37 4 A R JIM*PRASSAS 04258 001-210-0000-2110 04506 $175.00 9252 03239 38440 51 4. WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 9252 09/12/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 09/18/91 41 R JIM*PRASSAS 04258 001-210-0000-2110 04507 $1,575.00 9251 03238 38440 4 4? WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 9251 09/12/91 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 09/18/91 43 44 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,750.00 'A 45 „r 16 41 1 • 47 R BARRY*REED 03991 001-400-4601-4201 00984 $283.50 02897 38441 43 4,1 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 09/11/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 (+ 49 65 x $283.50 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** cr. 51 4G1 n 52 n r3 R DIANE*REEVES 03979 001-400-4601-4201 00987 $168.00 02900 38442 70 71 54 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 09/12/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 !? sr /3 ' 1 74 CCCtthJ 0 ot 4 0 0 J Jj • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH r2 34 x,11 h1NAML—ShA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009 TIME 11:36:33 FOR 09/19/91 DATE 09/19/91 2 3 E PAY VENDOR NAME VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK 0 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP s a 70 g *** VENDOR TOTAL**************at'a�titatitituitit'ttitiEiri*********iF*itiriFuit***t►iF**** t***xiFit#ifl►�►*** $168. 00 9 i, 1J '? 1 R DWAIN*ROQUE 0`2859 001-400-4601-4201 00982 $364.00 03501 38443 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 09/11/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91'', 13 14 v ,0 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $364.00 ,9 15 20 1 21 R 22 S. A. ASSOCIATES 03338 105-400-2601-4201 00061 $1,928.00 3 02931 38444 2J i8 ST LITE ASSESSMENT/AUG91 3 08/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/51_24 2s I R S. A. ASSOCIATES 03338 155-400-2102-4201 00081 $967.83 3 02931 38444 z, . CR GRD ASSESSMENT/AUG 91. 3 08/31/91 CROSSING GUARD /CONTRACT SERVICE/PBIVAT $0 00 09/18/91 28 23 24 9 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $2,895.83 33 12 2 Z0 2' 31 34 R SUSAN*SAXE—CLIFFORD,PH D 00839 001-400-1203-4320 00389 $275.00 1-0904-7 03010 38443 �s PSYCH EVALUATION/POLICE 904-7 09/04/91 PERSONNEL /PeBE—EMPLOYMENT EXAMS Q9L18/91 24 2) 30 __$0,_00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $275. 00 39 40 131 JI 42 p321 R SHARP SEATING COMPANY, 04187 001-400-4601-4201 00980 $60.00 443 02870 38446 4, IniBUS PKG PASS/ROSE PARADE 443 09/16/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAJ $0.00 114 09/18/91 44 46 13' R SHARP SEATING COMPANY 04187 001-400-4601-4201 00981 $1,248.00 443 02852 38446 , 36 ROSE PARADE TRIP TICKETS 443 09/16/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $1,248.00 09/18/91 ,,, l..8 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1.308.00 s, 37 52 40 53 R SOURISSEAU SUPPORT SERVICES 02075 001-400-2101-4201 00864 $840.00 1950-51 03108 38447 54 -t2 BACKGRND INVESTIGATIONS 50-51 09/09/91 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 66 43 sr n., *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** •:a 4 5840. 00 G: 46 LI 17 R 62 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-41000-3302 41782 $13,338.00 02720 38448 8, 48 CITATION SURCHARGE/AUG91 • 09/16/91 /COURT FINES/PARKING $0.00 09/18/91 64 49 65 W 0 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $13.338.00 6.; .. 51 `y613 ,0 ,57 R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-2201-4309 01144 $28.15 00862 38449 ,11 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/18/91 32 v J' y 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 11:36:33 rMVC UULU • FOR 09/19/91 ', ! DATE 09/19/91 4 --VENDOR L, 5 I5 PAY NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # 5 DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP E L ] a i- 9 iR SOUTH BAY WELDERS 00018 001-400-3103-4309 01220 $13.95 _ 00862 38449 " MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/18/91 �3 lu •+ 11? R SOUTH BAY WELDERS 06018 001-400-3104-4309 00738 $13.95 00862 38449 4 15 MISC. CHARGES/AUG 91 08/31/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 09/18/91 fi e *** VENDOR TOTAL #•nota•****•N••r•x•r••irar�ttr•n•n•ar�r•�ra•it•rat•u••stir•a••wat•ir•irx••it•n• •rit•r•a• ••i►•rtt•ir�te►star•n•grit•xat•pat•a•it•u•rt••p••x�r•�r•rr•n•p• $56.05 19 23 7 21 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-2101-4303 00050 524.56 00863 38450 2? 23 ELECTRIC BILLS/AUG 91 08/31/91 POLICE /UTILITIES $0.00 09/10/91 ?4 20 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00163 $33.47 00863 38450 126 ELECTRIC BILLS/AUG 91 08/31/91 MEDIANS /UTILITIES $0.00 09/18/91 �:n R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-3104-4303 00084 $710.84 00863 38450 ELECTRIC BILLS/AUG 91 08/31/91 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES $0.00 09/18/91 1 3?. 1C R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00485 $8,442.01 00863 38450 ELECTRIC BILLS/AUG 91 08/31/91 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 50.00____0.9/18/91 34 15 !fi ,'z1 kELECTRIC R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00372 $1,513.03 00863 38450 BILLS/AUG 91 08/31/91 PARKS /UTILITIES $0.00 09/10/91 39 •+I '3 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EQISON CO. 00159 105-400-2601-4303 00309 $230.63 00663 38450 ELECTRIC BILLS/AUG 91 . 08/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES $0.00 09/18/91 4• . n 35 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00170 $21.27 00863 38450 ELECTRIC BILLS/AUG 91 - 08/31/91 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES $0.00 09/18/91 , 4'. 37 16 39 '1 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************r**************************************** $10,975.81 '" 41 2 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00310 $11,550.65 00012 38451 STREET LITE BILLS/AUG 91 08/31/91 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES $0.00 09/18/91 44 4559 *** VENDOR TOTAL************•r*****at******ar*****at***ar*at*ar************************.carat* $11,550.65 57 : 4Cr- I] n,-, • R WARD — THK 03937 705-400 1`209-4201 00219 $3,374.41 03014 38452 REIMB LIABILITY/AUG 91 08/31/91 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/16/91 1-1 C2 63 64 49 50 51 $ R WARD — THK 03937 705-400-1209-4324 00210 $876.21 03014 38452 MB LIABILITY/AUG 91 08/31/91 LIABILITY INS /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $0.00 09/18/91 65 , Cn 52 i3 e, l9 70 ]1 55. 1 19 t J J /.J ay far • J CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ,2 r lIVMIVI.C—arM.]4U DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 TIME 11:36:33 FOR 09/19/91 DATE 09/19/913 '' 4 ' PAY VENDOR NAME 5 6 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 7 El *** VENDOR TOTAL********•n*•►r#****•n*•n******tr*******•n•n*•n***•Irr**•I►**•war**•a•*********•a•*#•nuc** $4. 230.62 9 o ,2 u ,2 1 R WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY Ob141 001-400-1131-4201 00670 $138.47 09378 38453 PUBLICATIONS/CITY CLERK 09/03/91 CITY ATTORNEY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 13 14 Is ” ISI *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $138.47 11 0 9 {C G ,,17 'o R ELLEN*WRIGHT 04262 001-400-4601-4201 00990 $490.00 02893 38454 SUMMER CLASS INSTRUCTOR 09/10/91 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 09/18/91 21 2-2 z4 24 25 16 27 28 21 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $490.00 rs ., • 24 *** PAY CODE TOTAL**z*************************************************************** $224,628.99 29 33 31 26 7 27 *** TOTAL WARRANTS****************************************************************** $545,799.16 33 r1 _, 36 !. 29 I Y/ 3/ 30 39 31 3 I a3 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMAND S OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE WARRANTS LISTED ON PAG 1 S TO ii INCLUSIVE, 41 C2 a3 94. 4/ ml 34 35 o 3G WARRANT-REGISTER�OR-�/ / 9 __ OFSHF ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT, AND46 TO 7H ARE IN CONFORMANCE BUDGET. 7/�'� 30 39 BY FINAN R DIRECTOR DATE 9/9/9/ <, �`' 51 41 4265 51 54 56 43 14 5/ A 59 46 47 40 I • GI E2 63 64 49 50 h uY68 65 GG 67 52 53 54 /l •70 .. 70 71 72 56 l,7 aye 75 74 1 V .41 V • September 16,1991 Honorable Mayor and For the Meeting of Members of the City Council September 24,1991 CANCELLATION ON WARRANTS Please consider the following request for cancellation of the warrants listed below. #037996 - 8/15/91 - Minhhoa Pham - $250.00 - Account Number 001-210-0000-2110 - Stop payment was made. Refund requested previously under business name. #038169 - 9/5/91,,- Robert Evans - $100.00 - Account Number 001- 210-0000-2110. Thcorrect vendor picked up from vendor list. Warrant was not mailed. #038202 - 9/5/91 - Thomas O'Neal - $7,331.76 - Account Number 170-300-0000-3304. Purchase order made out to incorrect person. Warrant was not mailed. #038218 - 9/5/91 - Sig -Govt - $190.00 - Account Number 001-202- 0000-2020. Incorrect vendor number assigned. Warrant was not mailed. Concur: Kevin Nort craf City Manager Gary Bru•sch City Treasurer Noted for fiscal impact Viki Copeland Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council October 8, 1991 September 18, 1991 City Council Meeting of September 24, 1991 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Proclamation for Fire Prevention Week Report on cost effectiveness of downtown enforcement (GIP) Report on increasing police foot patrol CIP 89-142 - Accept slurry seal' as- complete Design of school Greenbelt crossing and signal• Rental agreement for office copier Council 5/8/90 Discuss financial arrangements on oil project Extension of lease with Macpherson Oil Company Greenbelt parking designs Hearing Recommendation on Park Pacific Shopping Center street improvements Public Hearing Agreement w/Macpherson Oil (?) October 22, 1991 Presentation of Sheriff's Study Report on productivity incentives for employees (GIP) Public Safety/Finance Public Safety Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Public Safety Director City Manager City Manager Public Works Director Public Works Director City Manager Public Safety Director Personnel Director Award annual fuel bid purchase Public Works Director - 1 - 1C a CIP 89-142 - Award contract for sidewalk repairs Public Works Director RFP for Traffic Engineer Public Works Director CIP 89-406, Accept sewer project as complete Public Works Director 1st quarter status report on CIPs Quarterly report on Goals Implemen- tation Program Council 8/27 Study of camping in public parking lots November 12, 1991 Alternatives for parking solutions on PCH (GIP) Draft formal agreement on City maintenance of school property in exchange for allowing use of school property for recreation when available Participate w/school civics program coordinator (GIP) CIP 85-137 - Valley Ardmore overlay accept as complete Award contract for downtown area maintenance Review of Civil Service Board applications November 26, 1991 Installation of new Councilmembers, Treasurer, City Clerk City Mgr.3/25/91 Amendment of ordinance regulating real estate signs Public Works Director City Manager General Services Building Director Community Resources Dir. Personnel Director Public Works Director Public Works Director Personnel Director City Clerk Building Director CIP 89-151 - Award contract for Office of Traffic Safety grant Public Works Director Council 6/25/91 Agreement on Prospect/ Aviation signs & review of left turn arrow at Prospect & Aviation Public Works Director December, 1991 Council 8/13/91 Report on procedure for protecting survey monuments 16th to 19th sts. Public Works Dir. Report on implementation of new computer system (GIP) Data Processing Award contract for janitorial services Public Works Director Project Touch Lease renewal Community Resources Dir. Statistical survey - requested at 4/23/91 meeting January 14, 1992 Hope Chapel Lease Renewal (Rm. 13) Community Resources January 28, 1992 2nd Quarter CIP status report Public Works Director Quarterly update Goals Implementa- tion Plan City Manager Award contract for Traffic Engineer Public Works Director Appeal of P.C. denial of request to allow a 2nd story office addition providing less than required off- street parking at 415 Pier Ave. Planning Director February 11, 1992 Approval of Land Use Element (GIP) Planning Director Council 7/23/91 Vehicle parking on unimproved r -o -w including pedestrian walk streets Public Works Director February 25, 1992 Street lighting/Crossing Guards - resolutions ordering preparation of reports Report on improving T.V. capabilities for Council Chambers (GIP) Identify misc. revenue, develop appropriate fee (GIP) Public Works Director Community Resources Finance Director March 24, 1992 CIP 89-142 - Accept sidewalk repairs as complete Public Works Director Report on Management audits (GIP) Finance Director April 14, 1992 Rotation of Mayor April 28, 1992 Proclamation declaring May Water Awareness Month 3rd Quarter CIP status report Public Works Director Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program May 12, 1992 Proclamation Public Works Week May 18 to 22 Project Touch lease renewal (Rms. 3 & 11) May 26, 1992 City Manager Public Works Director Community Resources Dir. Street lighting/Crossing Guard (a) resolution approving report (b) resolution setting public hearing for June 23 Public Works Director June 9, 1992 Dispute Resolution Services lease renewal Community Resources Dir. June 23, 1992 Report on civilian enforcement officers (GIP) Public Safety Director Street lighting/Crossing Guard public hearing Public Works Director July 28, 1992 4th Quarter CIP status report Public Works Director Quarterly update of Goals Implementation Program City Manager - 4 - August 11, 1992 Hope Chapel Lease renewal (Rms. 5, 6A) September 8, 1992 Recommendation on changing telephone system (GIP) Association for Retarded Citizens lease renewal (Rm. 1, 2, 15) South Bay Hospital District lease renewal (Rm 9) Easter Seals lease renewal (Rms. 16, 17) December, 1992 Housing element (GIP) Project Touch lease renewal (Rm.C) Community Resources Dir. General Services Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Planning Director Community Resources Dir. ***************************************************************** Upcoming Items Not Yet Calendared Caltrans utility maintenance agrmt. Historic Preservation Ordinance (with Land Use Element) Public Works Director Planning Director ***************************************************************** Initiated by Party Date Council 5/8/90 Re. oil project CUP - define "temporary" as relates to height of project Planning Director Goal 4 5/16/90 Options to computerize per- sonnel as part of payroll function Finance Director Council 8/14/90 Review of standard CUP conditions Planning Dir. Council 10/9/90 Map and time schedule for street sweeping Public Wks. Dir. Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Dir. City Mgr.2/21/91 RFP for computer system General Svcs. Dir. Council 3/12/91 South School Conceptual design Community Resources Dept. 3/27/91 CIP 89-176 - Call for bids, traffic signal pre-emption Public Works Director Council Bid spec. for office systems (furniture) Finance Director VPD recommendation on sidewalk scrubber General Services Director Award of bid for purchase of computer equipment for Police Dept. Public Safety Director Council 6/6/91 Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Council 6/25/91 Trash enclosure City- wide enforcement - hardship considerations Staff 7/25/91 Adjustment of Park Tax Council 8/13 Later parking hours in residential areas in downtown area Council 8/27 Revision of allowable uses in open space zone Planning Director Building Director Building Director General Services Planning Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 18, 1991 City Council Meeting of September 24, 1991 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS, AUGUST 1991 Attached are the financial reports for August. General fund revenue for 16% of the year is 13.7%; after adjusting for proper- ty taxes, which are not received until December, revenue would be 15.94%. Parking Fund revenue is 17.1% received. Expenditures in the General Fund are 14.9% for 16% of the year; Parking Fund expenditures are 15.4% of,budget. Concur: Kevin B. North raft Viki Copeland Finance Director City Manager Attachments !� �, f rT FINANCE—FA484 0; TIME 10:54:1B m• ®' FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND) •FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE DEPARTMENT 0000 s PAGE 0001 DATE 09/18/91 !„,i) 316 16. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE__I?j UNREALIZED 51 BALANCE 7o' 3100 TAXES 3101 3102 3103 3106 3107 3108 3110 3111 3112 3113 37 0- 139 40 404' 143 ®44 45 3114 3115 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /CURRENT YEAR SECURED /CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS /SUPPLEMENTAL ROLL SB813 /TRANSFER TAX /SALES TAX /CABLE TV FRANCHISE /ELECTRIC FRANCHISE /GAS FRANCHISE /REFUSE FRANCHISE 3, 369, 640. 00 42, 709. 31- 255, 705. 00 177, 682. 10 20, 000. 00 30, 546. 16 125, 000. 00 25, 149. 28 70, 000. 00 0. 00 1, 750, 000. 00 41, 700. 00 130, 000. 00 34, 421. 22 41, 478. 00 0. 00 29, 603. 00 0. 00 154, 350.,_00 20, 398. 28 /TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY /BUSINESS LICENSE 0. 00 177, 682. 10 28, 220. 02 40, 030. 01 8, 515. 65 166, 400. 00 34, 421. 22 0. 00 0. 00 27, 909. 36 244, 048. 00 13, 787. 22 35, 875. 70 452, 400. 00 28, 821. 45 111, 799. 22 6, 642, 224. 00 329, 796. 40 ¢30, 853`28 3200 LICENSES AND PERMITS 3202 /DOG LICENSES 18, 000. 00 3203 /BICYCLE LICENSES 200. 00 3204 /BUILDING PERMITS 170, 000. 00 3205 /ELECTRIC PERMITS 320640, 000. 00 /PLUMBING PERMITS 32, 000. 00 3207 /OCCUPANCY PERMITS 3209 9, 000. 00 3211 /GARAGE SALES 140.00 /BANNER PERMITS 4, 070. 00 3212 /ANIMAL/FOWL PERMITS 650.00 3213 /ANIMAL REDEMPTION FEE 3,500.00 3214 /AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT 1,050.00 3215 /TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT 900.00 3216 /SPRAY BOOTH PERMIT 79. 00 3217 /OPEN FIRE PERMIT 3218 /AUTO REPAIR PERMIT 3221 /BEACH VOLLEYBALL APP OBJECT SUBTOTAL 46 ® 47 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3301 /VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS 3303 /COURT FINES/POLICE DEPT 1499 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 51 1s2 54 ss Q s6 �S7 -',292. 75_-?' 4:9. 00 12, 755. 27 1, 409. 00 1, 466. 00 800. 00 27. 00 796. 75 33. 00 24, 520. 51 3, 507. 00 2, 970. 00 1, 600. 00 51. 00 740. 00 0. 00 595. 00 175. 00 60. 00 0. 00 172. 00 0. 00 114. 00 0. 00 200. 00 0. 00 18, 329. 02 280, 071. 00 3, 369, 640. 00 _ 0, 0 ,of 78, 022. 90 69. 4 8, 220. 02— 141. 1 84, 969. 99 ___._32_0 oo 61, 484.35 12.1 21 1, 583, 600. 00 9. 5 95, 578. 78 __ ___26._4 41, 478. 00 0. 0 29, 603. 00 0. 0 126, 440. 64 _______ ..18. 0 208, 172. 30 14. 7 340, 600. 78 24. 7 6.011,_370-72__________9_4_ T 19. 24 25 26 27 20 17, 203. 25 167. 00 145, 479. 49 36, 493. 00 29, 030. 00 9. 2 4. 4 16. 5 14. 4 8. 7 925. 00 100. 00 1, 120. 00 525. 00 150. 00 0. 00 7, 400. 00 17. 7 89. 00 36. 4 3, 145. 00 22. 7 550. 00 15. 3 2, 380. 00 32. 0 525. 00 50. 0 750. 00 16. 6 75.00 O.0 172. 00 0. 0 114. 00 0. 0 200. 00 0. 0 243, 772. 74 12. 9 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 36, 298. 26 29 3031 32 0 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY • 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 3402 /RENTS & CONCESSIONS 3403 t /PIER REVENUE 135, 000. 00 141951. 53 14, 951. 53 607000. 00 3. 706. 19 3, 706. 19 195, 000. 00 18, 657. 72 18, 657. 72 237, 180,00 24, 220.22 3, 000. 00 362. 16 10, 700. 00 1, 307. 80 2.16083._53 569. 49 2, 613. 20 120, 048. 47 56, 293. 81 176, 342. 28 9. 5 20, 996. 47 91,J 2, 430. 51 8, 086. 80 18. 9 24. 4 ® +I FINANCE-FA484 ' ! TIME 10: 54: 18 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 001 GENERAL FUND i J ,. ,1 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0002 ;' FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/18/91 16.0:: OF YEAR COMPLETE 1 UNREAL_ I ZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3404_ _ /COMM CTR LEASES 90. 000. 00 _ 15, 594. 10 21. 438. 90 68, 561. 10 23. 8 3405 - /COMM CTR RENTALS 52, 000. 00 = 7, 488. 75 13, 442. 75 38. 557. 25 25. 8 3406 /COMM CTR THEATRE 30, 000. 00 4, 553. 90 8. 523. 40 21. 476. 60 28. 4 3411 /OTHER FACILITIES 26, 000. 00 1, 896. 75 4, 538. 50 21, 461. 50 17. 4 3412 /TENNIS COURTS 13, 000. 00 930. 75 1, 693. 75 11, 306. 25 13. 0 3414 /PROP A CONVERSION 110, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 110, 000. 00 O. 0 3418 /SPEC IAL EVENTS 30, 000. 00 10, 500. 00 12, 074. 00__ ___ 17, 926. 00 _ _ 40. 2 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 601, 880. 00 66. 854. 43, 281, 077. 52 320. 802. 48 46. 6 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3504 /IN LIEU OFF HIGHWAY 333.00 0.00 166. 79 166.21 50. 0 3505 /IN LIEU MOTOR VEHICLE 688, 312. 00 51, 472. 59 109, 738. 98 578, 573. 02 15. 9 3507 /HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE 4, 000. 00 O. 00 2,'565. 81 1, 434. 19 64. 1 ... ... 3508 /MANDATED COSTS 0.00 0.00 918.00 918. 00- O.O 3509 /HOMEOWNER PROP TX RELIE 66. 500. 00 O. 00 O. 00 66. 500. 00 0. 0 3510 /POST-- - 48, 700. 00 0. 00 2, 5.59. 96 46, 140. 04 5. 2 3511 /STC -SVC OFF TRAINING 8, 500. 00 0. 00 O. 00 8, 500. 00 0. 0 3514 /CIGARETTE TAX 36, 790. 00 1, 265. 37 3, 249. 77 33, 540. 23 8. 8 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 853, 135. 00 52, 737. 96 119, 199. 31 733,235..69_ 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CH6RGES 3801 /RESIDENTIAL INSPECTION 9,000.00 600.00 1,200.00 7,800.00 13.3 3802 /SIGN REVIEW 4,000.00 400. 00 800. 00 3,200.00 20.0 3803 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 7,965.00 590. 00 1.475.00 6,490.00 18.5 3805 /CONDTL USE PERMIT AMEND 1.650.00 640. 00 960. 00 690. 00 58. 1 3806 /BOARD OF APPEALS 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.0 3808 /ZONE VARIANCE REVIEW 3,700.00 0.00 0.00 3,700.00 0.0 3809 /TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 3810 /FINAL MAP REVIEW 4,050.00 225.00 450.00 3,600.00 11. 1 3811 /ZONE CHANGE G P A 2,400.00 0.00 0.00 2,400.00 0.0 3812 /CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 24, 000.00 1,220.00 2,420• 00 21, 580.00 10. 0 3813 /PLAN CHECK FEES 105, 000. 00 6,834.75 26, 276. 32 78, 723. 68 25. 0 3814 /PLANNING/ZONING APPEAL 2.132.00 266.50 533.00 1.599.00 25.0 3815 /PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES 10, 000.00 2.418.07 4,591.60 5.408.40 45.9 3817 /SPECIAL CURB MARKING 420.00 0.00 0.00 420.00 0.0 3818 /POLICE SERVICES 2J, 000. 00 1,128.00 2,346.00 20, 654.00 10.2 3819 /JAIL SERVICES 10, 200.00 2.500.00 4,250.00 5,950.00 41.6 3820 /TRUSTY ADMIN FEE 150.00 20.00 264.00 114.00- 176.0 3821 /FINGERPRINT SERVICE 2,000.00 156.00 420.00 1,580.00 21.0 3823 /SPECIAL EVENT SECURITY 25, 000. 00 5,670.00 8,585.00 _ __16, 415. 00 34. 3 3824 /VEHICLE INSPECTION FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 3825 /PUBLIC NOTICE POSTING 80.00 10.00 20.00 60. 00 25. 0 to 0 0 O . O .® qtr'// ..1 ;i,( .�- r,\d`., ,�� 7..!'�"',.1.1 f 61) FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 4) TIME 10: 54: 18 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 001GENERAL FUND EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 41 - DEPARTMENT _0000 e i 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3826 /REC PROGRAMS/CLASSES 80, 000. 00 1. 878. 00 1'6 40.7 3827 /LIBRARY GROUNDS MAINT 5, 075. 00 0. 00 3831 /STREET CUT INSPECTION 40, 000. 00 6, 095. 00 3834 /ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 12, 000. 00 1 l 005. 00 3836 /FUMIGATION INSPECT FEE 8,000. 00 860. 00 3837 /RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 1, 000. 00 110. 00 3838 /SALE OF MAPS/PUBLICATIO 500. 00 59. 00 3839 /PHOTOCOPY CHARGES 1, 200. 00 95. 65 3840 /AMBULANCE TRANSPORT 9, 000. 00 1 I 697. 00 3841 /POLICE TOWING 26, 500. 00 ir 3, 462. 50 3856 /GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0. 00 O. 00 38:137 /PG PLAN APPLICATION 1, 840. 00 0. 00 3858 /TENANT REFUSE B ILL I NG 130.00 20. 00 3859 /REFUSE LIEN FEE 500. 00 363. 55 3861 /HAZARDOUS MAT PERMIT 1, 500. 00 000 3862 /ALARM PERMIT FEE 1, 800. 00 24000 3863 /FALSE ALARM FEE 2, 000. 00 200: 00 3866 /NONCONFORMING REMODELS 2, 680. 00 0. 00 3867 . . /PRECISE DEVLMNT PLANS 1, 145. 00 0. 00 3868 /PUBLIC NOT IC ING/300 FT 7, 975. 00 1, 595. 00 3869 /2ND PARTY RESPONSE 1, 500. 00 0. 00 38.1 _ - _ /PARAMEDIC RESP/NON-TRSP 1, 000. 00 0. 00 3972 /LOCK -OUT (CAR) ' 240. 00 0. 00 3873 /LOCK -OUT (HOUSE) 190 00 000 3874 /FLOODING WATER REMOVAL 174.. 00 0. 00 3875 /SPRAY BOOTH INSPECTION 900.00 000 3876 /FIRE PROTECT/SYS EX ISTG 210.00 000 3877 /SPRINKLER CERT TEST 92. 00 0. 00 3878 /COMML BLDG/APT INSPECT 1 e 750. 00 . 0. 00 3893 /FINAL/TENT MAP EXTNS ION 450.00 22500 3884 /LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 515. 00 0. 00 3890 /300 'RADIUS NOTCG/APL CC 920. 00 115. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 445, 833. 00 40, 699. 02 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3901 /SALE OF REAL/PERS PROP a' doo. oo 0.00 3902 /REFUNDS/RE IMB PREV YR 500. 00 246. 72 3903 /CONTRIBUTIONS NON GOVT 5, 000. 00 289. 41 3904 /GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS 5, 000. 00 15.34 .3909_ _ __ /LATE. FEE____ ..___ 0. 00 ._ 2.00 3955 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1, 649, 655. 00 137, 471. 25 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 668, 155. 00 138, 024. 72 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 7, 264. 00 0. 00 9, 005. 00 2, 035. 0 1,677. 0 190. 0 82.2 207. 7 3, 660. 0 71005. 5 PAGE 0003 I ) DATE 09/18/91 16. 07:. OF YEAR COMPLETE...1d UNREALIZED BALANCE % 1,,I i 72, 736. 00 5, 075. 00 30, 995. 00 9. 0 1,•;i• O. 0 22.5 40 O 9, 965. 00 16. 9 • •I 0 6, 323. 00 20. 9 O 810. 00 O 417. 80 5 992.25 O 5/ 340. 00 O 19, 494. 50 0. 00 920. 00 30. 00 371. 03 0. 00 570. 0 330. 0 1. 340. 0 1, 145. 0 3, 190. 0 0. 0 0. 00 920. 00 100. 00 128. 97 1, 500. 00 19.0 16.4 17. 3 40. 6 26. 4 0. 0 50. 0 74. 2 0. 0 31.6 O 11 670. 00 16. 5 0 0 0 • , • 1, 340. 00 50. 0 .1‘11 0. 00 100. Q 4. 785. 00 40.0 1.50000 0. 0 . 0 0. 00 - • la 000. 00 _ , 0. 0 0. 00 240. 00 0. 0 0. 00 190. 00 0. 0 0. 00 174. 00 _ 0. 0 0. 00 900. 00 0. 0 0. 00 210. 00 0. 0 -'' 0. 00 92. 00 0. 0 0. 00 1, 750. 00 • 0. 0 .• I, 675. 00 0. 00 345. 00 94, 633. 40 0. 00 5, 574. 37 3, 944. 41 826. 08 274, 942. 50 285, 289. 36 10, 686, 298. 00 665, 099. 27 1, 466, 008. 85 • t 225. 00- 150.0 I I 515..00 _ 0. 0 575. 00 37. 5 351. 199. 60 21.2 41 81000. 00 0. 0 • 5. 074. 377._ 1114.8 1. 055. 59 78.8 4, 173. 92 16.5 • . 0 1., 374, 712. 50 16.6 , 1, 382, 865. 64 17.1 .110 ,•1 9, 220, 289. 15 13. 7 ,, I FINANCE-FM.84 ,0 TIME 10:54:18 FUND OB,J DESCRIPTION H 001 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND .10 DEPARTMENT 0000 3900 OTHER REVENUE FUND TOTAL 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0004 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/18/91 : 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE :4 UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE X , 41. I AO Id. 41° 10,686,298.00 669,099.27 1,466,008.80 9,220,289.15 13.7 • S. ' 4 I„ I 0 4-'1 4f4111 111"4910.:101:rillWri!”..71;,V;*t' 4.:14)(0:1 ?It! . • • .g:•; .4 0 I CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0005 TIME 10:54:18 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/18/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND I DEPARTMENT 0000 4 I I I • .1 3100 TAXES 3101 /CURRENT YEAR SECURED 179,637.00 1.214.63- 0.00 179.637.00 3103 . /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS 5,000.00 407.40 407.40 4,592.60 • 8. 1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL ; 184, 637. 00 807.23- • 407.40 184,229.60 0.2 '10 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY _.._ r 3401 .,:i /INTEREST INCOME 90,785.00 5,085.43 5,085.43 85,699.57 5.6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 90,785.00 5,085.43 5, 085. 43 _85.699.57 __ -. 5. 6 - DEPT 0000 TOTALS 275, 422. 00 g 4, 278. 20 5, 492. 83 269, 929. 17 1. 9 : 0 'i _ . FUND TOTAL 275,422.00 4,278.20 5,492.83 269,929.17 1,9 ';.I -..11 H0 47; 0 • to to CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH -7----- FINANCE-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE - 0006T' TIME 10:54:18 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/18/91 L tO 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 4_i t ' i UNREALIZED 4 i FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE tLI i.: 121 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST 1 ! ! DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 4o ! 3401 / I NTEREST INCOME 1. 809. 00 335. 72 335. 72 1. 473. 28 18.5 „ 3407 /PARK ING LOT RENTAL 15.713. 00 • O. 00 1, 304. 10 14. 408. 90 8. 2 - 1 1 i•s „.„ so . 3409 VEHICLE PKG DIST/LOT B 22; 990. 00 0. 00 0. 00 22, 990. 00 0. 0 1 ' ' ..... i .. 3413 VEHICLE PKG DIST/VPD LEASE 69, 388. 00 15.000. 00 31. 508. 10 37, 879. 90 _ 45. 42 1 ' OBJECT SUBTOTAL 109; 900. 00 15, 335. 72 33, 147. 92 76, 752. OS 30.1 /r. I _ . 0 3800 CURRENT SERV I CE CHARGES 1, - • 3945 /VP D LOT PERM ITS/DA ILY 8, 000. 00 0. 00 173. 89 7,026. 11 2. 1 '• 1 3946 /VP D LOT PERM ITS/MONTHLY 10, 000. 00 x 0. 00 158. 40 9, 841. 60 1.5 , . 4111 1 7 I .13 40 '1 3847 VEHICLE PKG D IST/VAL I DAT ION STAMPS 22; 000. 00 0. 00 340. 54 21. 659. 46 1. 5 OBJECT SUB TOTAL 40, 000. 00 0. 00 672. 83 39. 327. 17 1. 6 DEPT 0000 FUND TOTAL ° TOTALS 149, 900. 00 15, 335. 72 33, 820. 75 116, 079. 25 22.5 J1' 1491900. 00 15. 3345. 72 33. 820. 75 116; 079. 25 22.5 `rfTfieVo'rivirso ems":1'..t.1-7" ty*NiZ5' „ It• s'i. ,•f• 7. • 6 • " ••%* ;;:•? ;•'•, ';••• U 0 0 F I NANCE-FA484 TIME 10: 54: 18 FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 110 PARKING FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3300 FINES & FORFEITURES 3302 /COURT FINES/PARKING 1, 300, 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 300, 000. 00 94, 490. 20 94. 490. 20 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 18, 894. 00 934. 92 0 1 3407 /PARKING LOT RENTAL 7; 200. 00 600.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26, 094. 00 1, 534. 92 PAGE 0007 DATE 09/18/91 k ilig, 16. 07OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 13 i 204, 951. 20 1, 095, 048. 80 204, 951. 20 1, 095, 048. 80. 3800 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3842 /PARKING METERS 3843 /PARKING PERMITS:ANNUAL 3844 /DAILY PARKING PERMITS 3848 3849 3830 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /DRIVEWAY PERMITS /GUEST PERMITS /CONTRACTOR'S PERMITS 758. 000. 00' 82/ 834. 85 191. 000. 00 4. 606. 50 1, 500. 00 490. 30 500. 00 82. 50 DEPT 0000 TOTALS FUND TOTAL 600. 00 97. 00 1e 000. 00 260. 00 952, 600. 00 88/ 371. 15 15. 7 934. 92 17, 959. 08 4. 9 1, 200. 00 6, 000. 00 16. 6 I 1,IS I 2. 134. 92 23. 959. 08 8. 1 r::11111 ;::,. 169, 788. 06 588, 211. 94 22. 3. .ril 1 1 t 905. 50 179, 094. 50 6. 2 ..?1 1, 000. 30 499. 70 66.6 165. 00 335. 00 33. 0 .:1 317. 00 283. 00 52.8 420. 00 580. 00 42. 0 :. le 183, 595. 86 769/ 004. 14 _ . 19.2 . _ •'1 2, 278, 694. 00 184, 396. 27 390, 681. 98 1, 888, 012. 02 17. 1 2, 278, 694. 00 184, 396. 27 390, 681. 98 lo 888; 012. 02 17. 1 • 1 a 1 .10 ; F NANG E—PA404 TIME 10: 54: 18 0 0 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 000Gj' FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/18/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7.311. 115 STATE GAS TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL, 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3501 /SECTION 2106 ALLOCATION 74,165.00 0.00 8,204.39 65,960.61 11.0 3502 /SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION 155,400.00 0.00 13,459.72 141,940.28 8.6 '' ID 3503 /SECT 2107.0 ALLOCATION 4•000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0. 00 100.0 3512 /SECTION 2105 (PROP 111) 78,080.00 0.00 10,874.93 67,205.07 13.9 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 311,645.00g 0.00 36,539.04 275,105.96 11.7 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 330,229.00 2,351.14 38,890.18 296,338.82 11.6 . _ . FUND TOTAL 333,229.00 2,351.14 38,890.18 296,338.82 11.6 ,' 0 1 23,584.00 2,351.14 2,351.14 23,584.00 2,351.14 ------ 2,351.14 21, 232. 86 21, 232. 86 9.9 9.9 ' 0 • 0 1!. • 0 !- ; 0 • ".0401,47:tr!4'W,r-Mit.f;IA' '1 1:*.r)rrfiteirTlYc'-'1r (°1114,Y;YrIcIrtM VIC4''.17A ;" r:` •tet;,,k,c1' to • • 9 FINANCE—FA484 TIME 10:54:18 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 PAGE 0009 I, DATE 09/18/91 w 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE :21 UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATEBALANCE 7. to • 120 COUNTY CAS TAX FUND DEPARTMENT0000 . 11/3400 USE OF MONEY PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 1,809.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1,809.00 0 • ' Hi 0 0 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 809. 00 0.00 0.00 1,609.00 0.00 0.00 1,609.00 0.0 • 0. 00 0. 00 1, 809. 00 0. , FUND TOTAL 1.809.00 1 0. 00 0. 00 1, 809. 00 0. 0 ti 14. 0... 411," ,43 • 0 • • „ 0 • e • 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH F I NANC E-FA484 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TIME 10:54:18 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 PAGE 001671' DATE 09/18/91 :1. 0 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ,. UNREALIZED ;:j FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 3100 TAXES 3116 /PARK REC FACILITY TAX OBJECT SUBTOTAL! 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7.000.00 0.00 7,000.00 7.000.00 0.00 7.000.00 92.728.00 6.170.97 6.170.97 86.557.03 6.6 121 92.728.00 6, 170. 97 6, 170. 97 86. 557. 03 6. 6 0 !•:: ta.! 0. 00 100.0 0. 00 • 100.0 ‘4' 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3910 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /PARK/RECREATION IN LIEU DEPT 0000 TOTALS FUND TOTAL 130.000.00, 10.396.00 18. 976. 00 111, 024. 00 14.5 , 0 130. 000. 00 10. 396. 00 .18, 976. 00 111, 024. 00 14. 5 ,' 229,728.00 16.566.97 32,146.97 197.581.03 13.9 11;c1 0 229.728.00 16.5§14.97 32,146.97 197, 581. 03 13. 9 1171 t", • .1 . • I., 7', 0 : S ''''''''''''''''''""""r..1*"*"140106%`'.1"",,t'-+•'', 7 • ---,:,:,.0-4,..,-,,'Attr4:'"*"4.11‘ +4,;11 S' . •..• , • = • FINANCE-FA484 9 TIME 10:54:18 FUND OBJ DESCRIPTION 126 UUT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 4- CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH _ . REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 0011 0 DATE 09/18/91 ,All 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 1, UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE BALANCE % I' t 1!) 3100 TAXES 3120 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /UT IL I TY USER TAX 906, 954. 00 64. 356. 99 144, 115. 69 762, 638. 31 ._.__15. 6 906, 954. 00 64, 356. 99 144, 115. 69 762, 838. 31 15. 8 3400 USE OF MONEY tf PROPERTY 34(11 OBJECT SUB TO rAL / INTEREST INCOME 30, 000. 00 869. 40 4.586. 12 25$ 413. 88 15. 2 30, 000. 00 869. 40 4, 586. 12 25, 413. 88 15. 2 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3955 /OPERAT I NG TRANSFERS IN 33, 685. 00 33, 685. 00 2, 807. 08 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 807. 08 • 5.614. 16 28* 070. 84 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 970, 639. 00 68, 033. 47 154/ 315. 97 816, 323. 03 5.614. 16 28, 070. 84 FUND TOTAL 970, 639. 00 68, 03% 47 154, 315. 97 816. 323. 03 * • • I 5 1,,41t CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA484 - 111E 10:54:18 h FUND 013J DESCRIPTION J 1 REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (13V FUND) FROM 00/01/91 TO 08/31/91 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE PAGE 00127 DATE 09/18/91 16. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE , UNPEALI7ED ' I DALANCE , 127 6% UTILITY USER TAX FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 :3100 TAXES 3120 OBJECT SUBTOTAL /UTILITY USER TAX 11:360• 441.00 1 I 360, 441. 00 96.535.44 96, 535. 44 3400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3401 /INTEREST INCOME 8) 375. 00 157. 77 157. 77 8. 217. 23 1.8 OBJECT SUBTOTAL12, i 8, 375. 00 157. 77 157. 77 8, 217. 23 1. 8 216.173.45 216,173.45 n in , MY I 1 1, 144, 267. 5`.3 15. 8 1• 144, 267. 55• 15.8 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 1, 368, 816. 00 96, 693. 21 216, 331. 22 1, 152, 484. 78 15.5 ,T 33C, 6) FUND TOTAL 1, 368, 816. 00 96,693.21 216,331.22 1, 152/ 484. 78 15.8 A') 17..7 '' I 0 1.55 1 0 I ' I • 140irr MIrtilier01,11V71 , f 7!;„: • ' FT 1 CC! IMUNI rr')..7!fS:Pflr:r: FUND ' TNIT:RGOVERNMENT/FEDERAL 3713 /HOUSING REHADILITAMN /CDG ADMINRATIUM OBJFCT FUND TOTAL 3 11) �d TOTALS CITY OF HERMOSA REVENUE SUMM f!'Y9 FUND/ FROM (.3/,:i1/1 m OF/1/91 EST REV 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. co MONTHLY REV YEAR TO 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. CC 0. CC 0. 00 0. 0C, 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 /• 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0.0 a 0. , 10' a) • o 9 e '0 ,4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINA'1•7.E-±A4P4 REVENUE '3UMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND ) TIT10'34.10 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DESCRIPTION 145 PROPOSITION 'A FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 7:1 .111 1.' /PROPOSITION A TRANSIT 2121 SUBREGNL INCENTIVE FUNDS UBJECT SUBTOTAL ..7100 USE OF MONEY & 3401 suBrorisd_ pporEn TY / NI ER E3 T I NC OME EST REV MONTHLY REV 210, 914. 00 0. 00 210, 914. 00 23, 182. 00 23. 182. 00 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3E1.34 /FARES, DIAL A RIDE 11, 300. 00 21.15 /BUS PASFFES 6, 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 500. 00 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 13, 699. 00 0. 00 13, 699. 00 YEAR TO DATE 30. 179. 00 0. 00 30, 179. 00 1,367.57 1, 367. 57 1, 367. 57 1. 367. 57 0. 00 151. 00 151. 00 0. 00 442. 00 442. 00 PAGE 0014 DATE 09/18/71 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED FALCF. • ':180. 735. 00 14 73 0. 00. 0 0 r 100, 735. no 14. 3 1••• 21. 814. 43 5. 8 21. 814. 43 3.8 7f; 11,500 00 17, 05173. 00 0. 0 7. 3 2. 5 251, 396. 00 15, 217. 57 31, 908. 57 219. 607. 43 12. 7 FUND TOTAL 2`JI 396. 00 0 15.217.57 31,988. 57 219,607.43 12.7 , . vo • e • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- I r I. 113 FUND !.:P1 ION r El.•:PATMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE :3:500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/STATE 3517 /OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFET 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 U1 JV. SUBTOTAL 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 i2C-;,T (7;000 TOTALS 40, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 FUND TOTAL 15 46,1600. 00 0.00 0.00 S. 0015 DATE 09/1R/91 16,0% OF YEAR COOPLETE UNREAL17ED BALANCE C. 40, 000. 00 40, 000. 00 40, 000. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 (11 0 • tr, a) • • 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ft 0 • FINANCE-TA1?1 TINE 10. FUNO (313J crl,.5cr3IF'TION 155 CRO5SING GUARD FUND oco• :11101 C103 QB,..,ECT SUBTOTAL /CURRENT YEAR SECURED /PRIOR YEAR COLLECTIONS :1100 nr, MMEY & PPOPERTY /INTEREST INCOME "fl3 r.1.7.PF 000° FUND TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0016 FROM 08/01/91 TO 09/31/91 DATE 09/18/91 0- 16.0% OF YEAR COMnLETE A, EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 53, 953. 00 5, 000. 00 58, 953. 00 2, 479. 00 2, 479. 00 TOTALS 61,432.004? • .61,432.00 469. 14- 469. 19 0. 05 238. 57 238.57 238. 62 238. 62 1 0.00 469.19 469.19 238. 57 238.57 707.76 707. 76 1.1*. !, 40 • , QP tot 0 53, 953. 00 4, 530. 81 58. 493. 81 2, 240. 43 2, 240. 43 60,724.24 00 9.3 0.7 9.6 9.6 1. 1 60, 724. 24 1. 1 • • 0 0 D i) • • • 'A !..,ran n;',' D!:SC:R_IPTION 1609::1 R FUND fro 9 9, 9 9 A 0 1^0 V. OF M0NEY Yi PROPERTY 3101 /INTEREST INCOME_ OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 140, 298. 00 3, 359. 81 3, 359. 81 140, 298. 00 3, 359. 81 3, 359. 81 11100 INTERGOVERNMENTAL/COUNTY _1602 /BEACH OUTLET MAINTENANC 4,000.00 BU0. 00 0. 00 EDT SUBTOTAL 4.000.00 0.00 0.00 '3900 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 3828 /SEWER CONNECTION FEE 18, 000. 00 342. 54 901. 47 17, 098. 53 5. 0 3827 /SEWER DEMOLITION FEE 1, 400. 00'1 150. 00 600. 00 800. 00 42. 8 3332 /SEWER LATERAL INSTALLTN 1,200.00 1,450.00- 1,150.00- L. 2,350.00 95. 8 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 20:600.00 957. 46- 351. 47 20, 248. 53 1. 7 3900 OTHER REVENUE 3?G3 O'EI.A I -!0 TRANSFERS IN 800, 000. 00 66, 666. 67 133, 333. 34 (:P• _'EC T SUBTOTAL t 0 PAGE 0017 DATE 09/18/91 16. 011 OF YEAR COMPLETE U!JREAI_ I '1 3P 0 ALAI'C E ,. 136, 938. 19 136, 938. 19 4, 000. 00 4, n00. 00 2.3 2.3 0.0 0.0 800, 000. 00 66, 666. 67 133, 333. 34 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 964, 898. 00 69, 069. 02 137, 044. 62 FUND TOTAL 964, 898. 00 69, 069. 02 137, 044. 62 • 666, 666. 66 666, 666. 66 827, 853.38 16. 6 16. 6 14. 2 827. 853. 38 14.2 lb I • • • • F I FIANCE-F-A4B4 TIME 10 01: 18 FUN2 O!'J DESCRIPTION 170 ASSFT 1E1ZUR7E/FORFEITURE FUND DEP .;'•' ! NEr ! r OCOC) F'tN!_.3 Y< FORFEITURES 7.1 04 /FORFEITED FUNDS 400, 000.00 1.497, 032.15 1.514;163.57 1, 114. 163. 57- 378.5 OB,JE'T SUBTOTAL 400, 000.00 1.497. 032. 15 1. 514. 163. 57 1, 114. 163. 57- 378. 5 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO OB/31/91 EST REV MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE ii PAGE 0018 DATE 09/18/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE v. 3400 USE OF MONEY a, PROPERTY 3101 /INTEREST INCOME 8.509.00 95. 28 95. 28 8.413.72 1-1 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 8.509.00 95.28 95.28 -' 8.413. 72 1. 1 ^EPT 0000 TOTALS 408, 509. 00 1. 497, 127. 43 1:514.258.85 1.105,749.85- 370. 6 FUND TOTAL 408, 509. 00 • 9 1. 497. 127. 43 1. 514. 258. 85 1. 105.749.85- 370.6 m • • r• • • 0 • • • • "Ps 0, tlf • 11 • FINANCE —rA104 TINE 10-!j1.10 ruF.1 UEJ DESCRIPTION 190 FEW: ":'7UTECTION FUND DEPAO-!"-!r:NT 000 00tflE OF NONEY & PROPERTY .2401 /INTEREST INCOME (DjElIT.1 SUBTOTAL 700 OTHFR REVENUE OBJECT SUBTOTAL /FIRE FLOW FEE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH. REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 06/31/91 EST REV 20, 368. 00 20, 368. 00 100, 000. 00 100, 000. 00 VERT 0000 TOTALS 120,368.00 FUND TOTAL 120,368.00 MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 1,560.12 1,560.12 1,560.12 1,560.12 6,292.59 6,292.59 7,852.71 7,852.71 12,377.84 12,377.84 13,937.96 13,937.96 PAGE 0019 DATE 09/19/91 lel 16. OF YEAR COMPLETE H UNREALIZED BALANCE j,II, • 18.1307.88 ' 18, 807. 88, 1 87,622.16 87,622. 16 _ 106, 430. 04 106,430.04 .1 7.6 7.6 12.3 12.3 11. 5 11. 5 1. F3 NA''•ICE-i !,9 `' r T..ic 1 J' :. r: 1.f4 FUND P'?J DESCRIPTION 72nD 1!IPUVEMENT FUND T F-ti:,,,r:T1-!F ;lr 0000 3Y00 OTHER REVENl1F_ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH _ REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PACE 0020 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/18/91 • ( 16. D% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED EST REV MONTHLY REV ' YEAR TO DATE BALANCE 7. .:. • 31'3'3 /OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 3, 521, 000. 00 342, 743. 64 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3, 321, 000. 00 342, 743. 64 D( -:FT C^^!? TOTALS 3, 321, 000. 00 ^42. 743. 64 FUND TOTAL 3, 521. 000. 00 342, 743. 64 A 0 e • 593, 563. 56 593, 563. 56 593, 563. 56 593, 563. 56 2. 927. 436. 44 2.927,436.44' 2. 927. 436. 44 16. 8 16.8 16. 8 2, 927, 436.44 16.8 .® • 0 • 0 0 3 • • • • 0 FINANCE: —FA181. TIME 10:54:18 FUN)) D!7SCRIPTION 705 INSUP-.W1L FUND DEPARTMENT 0000 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REVENUE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 EST REV 2'?00 ortiR REVENUE 3902 /REFUNDS/REIMB PREV YR 0.00 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 0.00 ' /TRANS,:ER IN—DEPT INS SVS 913,197.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 913,197.00 54 MONTHLY REV YEAR TO DATE 0 00 0.00 76,100.00 76,100.00 DEPT 0000 TOTALS 913,197.00 76,100.00 FUND TOTAL 5. PAGE 0021 DATE 09/18/91 to 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE UNREALIZED BALANCE 7. .b . 9,107.64 .,,,, 9,107.84— 0.0 0.00 0.00. 0.0 152,200.00 ,760,997. 00 16.6 161,307.84 ::-.751, 887. 16 17.6 161,307.84 ,,1751,889.16 17.6 913, 197. 001' 76, 100. 00 161, 307. 84 REPORT TOTALS 22,577,335.00 3,061,103.24 4,790,497.91 751, 889. 16 17, 787, 037. 09 17. 6 21.2 I tit I. 1 n 1 1 1 e1 4,1 9 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE--F=A454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0001 TTF1!= 19:24'24 FROM 08/01/91 TO 03/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMrLETE FUND D.I'V OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1101 CITY COUNCIL APPROPR IATION DEPT: LEGISLATIVE '1102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICU, PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL_ CASH IN 4112 PART 'TIME/TEMPORARY 1120 SOCIAL `;ECURITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4='00 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTFIER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4319 SPECIAL EVENTS 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ 23, 472. 00 352. 00 352. 00 18, 000. 00 0.00 209.00 42, 385. 00 2, 500. 00 2, 500. 00 300. 00 7, 500. 00 6, 000. 00 2, 750. 00 500. 00 3, 198. 00 20, 248. 00 DIVISION TOTAL._ 65, 133. 00 1121 CITY CLERK DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICU. PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4180 SOCIAL SF_CURITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4700 CONTRACT SERVICES 4.701 CONTRACT ERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 27, 600. 00 414. 00 414. 00 19, 133. 00 0. 00 678. 00 48, 239. 00 1, 285. 00 1, 285. 00 668. 00 2, 300. 00 297. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1, 955. 96 0. 00 130. 60 1, 500. 00 17. 40 18. 60 3, 622. 56 3, 911. 92 0. 00 261. 20 3, 000. 00 34. 80 37. 20 7, 245. 12 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 19, 560. 08 0. 00 352. 00 0. 00 90. 80 0. 00 15, 000. 00 0. 00 34. 80- 0.00 171.80 0. 00 35, 139. 88 16. 6 0. 0 74.2 16. 6 0 0 17. 7 17. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 500. 00 0. 0 0. 00 ' 0. 00 0. 00 2, 500. 00 0. 0 29. 88 388. 72 1, 557. 00 0. 00 91. 61 267. 00 2, 334. 21 5, 956. 77 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 840. 54 55. 69 155. 56 4,051. 79 '100.00 100. 00 97. 99 108. 65 0. 00 37. 14 817. 73 1, 557. 00 0. 00 91. 61 534. 00 3, 037. 48 10, 282. 60 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 8, 481. 40 109. 18 301. 72 8, 892. 30 100. 00 100. 00 117.70 398. 73 100. 00 0. 00 262. 86 12. 3 0. 00 6, 682. 27 10. 9 0. 00 4, 443. 00 25. 9 0. 00 2, 750. 00 0. 0 0. 00 408. 39 18. 3 0. 00 2, 664. 00 16. 6 0.00 17,210.52 15.0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 54, 850. 40 15. 7 27, 600. 00 414. 00 414. 00 10, 651. 60 109. 18- 376. 28 39, 346. 70 1, 185. 00 1, 185. 00 550. 30 1, 901. 27 197. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 44. 3 0. 0 44. 5 18. 4 7. 7 7. 7 17. 6 17. 3 33. 6 QY Q' ct Oat 1 0 0 0 FINANCE -FA154 TIM: 19:24:24 FUND DIV GOUT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1 121 CITY CL.E-RI. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) PACE 0002 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 1:100 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4323 PUBLIC NOTICING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL. `.100 E_Q'UIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 033. 00 660. 00 10, 185. 00 1, 829. 00 16, 972. 00 1, 400. 00 1, 400. 00 0. 00 0. 00 273. 00 152. 00 631. 64 0. 00 0. 00 129. 00 304. 00 1, 049. 43 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 1, 033. 00 0. 0 660. 00 0. 0 10, 056. 00 1. 2 1, 525. 00 16. 6 15, 922. 57 6. 1 1, 400. 00 0. 0 1, 400. 00 0. 0 DIVISION TOTAL 67, 896.00 4,783.43 10, 041.73 0.00 57, 854.27 14.7 1122 ELECTIONS DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL. 1, 100. 00 1, 100. 00 25, 500. 00 25, 500. 00 172. 00 1, 151. 00 1, 287. 00 660. 00 3, 270. 00 0. 00 Q. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3. 000. 00- 3. 000. 00- 0. 00 329. 34 0. 00 0. 00 329. 34 29, 870. 00 2, 670. 66- 1131 CITY ATTORNEY DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 120, 000. 00 120, 000. 00 200. 00 325. 00 15, 983. 20 15, 983. 20 3, 000. 00- 3, 000. 00- 0. 00 882. 66 0. 00 0. 00 882. 66 747. 50 747. 50 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 2,117.34- 747.50 15, 983. 20 15, 983. 20 37. 40 47.77 18. 19 18. 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 1, 100. 00 0. 0 1, 100. 00 0. 0 27,752.50 8. 8 27, 752. 50 8. 8 172. 00 0. 0 268. 34 76. 6 1, 287. 00 0. 0 660. 00 0. 0 2, 387. 34 26. 9 31,239:84 4.5 104, 016. 80 104, 016. 80 152. 23 306. 81 13. 3 13. 3 23. 8 5. 5 O 0 0` 0' 0 ©' 0 0 01 0 61 I CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-FA151 EXPENDITURE_ SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0003 i TINS 19:24:24 FROM OB/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.05 OF YEAR COMPLETE e - FUND DIV OP,JT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER OBJECT SUBTOTAL 525. 00 55. 59 65. 96 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 120, 525.00 1 1132 CITY PROSECUTOR DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4100 PEPSONAL SERVICES 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES ,201 CONTRACT SERVICE: /PRIVATE (OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4_'•00 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL. DIVISION TOTAL 0.00 0.00 63, 004. 00 63, 004. 00 200. 00 831. 00 1, 031. 00 16, 038. 79 16, 049. 16 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 69. 00 69. 00 64, 035. 00 69. 00 1141 CITY TREASURER DEPT: LEGISLATIVE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK, PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE_ BENEFITS OBJECT_ SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 30, 288. 00 250. 00 454. 00 454. 00 15, 144. 00 0. 00 659. 00 47, 249. 00 2. 000. 00 2, 000. 00 840. 00 1, 545. 00 185. 00 250. 00 500. 00 2, 524. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 262. 00 54. 90 0. 00 3, 840. 90 0. 00 0.00 74. 59 105. 33 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 562. 50 562.50 0. 00 138. 00 1a8. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 700. 50 0. 00 5, 048. 00 240. 24 0. 00 0. 00 2, 524. 00 113. 28 0. 00 7, 925. 52 45. 28 45. 28 94. 30 260. 36 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 459 04 104, 475. 84 0.00 0. 00 62. 441. 50 62, 441. 50 200. 00 693. 00 893. 00 12.5 13. 3 0.0 0. 0 0. 8 0. 8 0.0 16. 6 13. 3 63, 334. 50 1. 0 25. 240. 00 9. 76 454. 00 454. 00 12, 620. 00 113. 28- 659. 00 39, 323. 48 1;954.72 1,954.72 745. 70 1, 284. 64 185. 00 250. 00 500. 00 16. 6 96. 0 0.0 0.0 16. 6 0. 0 0.0 16. 7 11. 2 16. 8 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 • a FIN/•.N::E--F4434 TIME 19:24:24 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1141 CITY TREASURER DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/LOTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1201 CITY MANAGER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 APPROPRIATION LEGISLATIVE 1, 571. 00 4. 891. 00 54, 140. 00 401, 599. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL_ SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATILIN/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE .BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CMGS . OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL_ 1202 FINANCE_ ADMIN DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 108, 484. 00 1, 627. 00 1, 627. 00 3, 640. 00 226. 00 1, 242. 00 116, 846. 00 205. 00 205. 00 500. 00 1, 750. 00 0. 00 0. 00 725. 00 3, 500. 00 2. 300. 00 5, 012. 00 13, 787. 00 130, 838. 00 MGMT/SUPPORT 226, 733. 00 3, 500. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 131. 00 310. 97 4, 151. 87 28, 329. 20 9, 039. 96 0. 00 130. 40 0. 00 105. 55 0. 00 9, 275. 91 22. 00 22. 00 71. 94 160. 40 0.00 0. 00 615. 00 0.00 75. 30 418. 00 1,340.64 10', 638. 55 18, 704. 99 630. 18 262. 00 616.66 8,587.46 43, 544. 11 18, 329. 92 0. 00 260. 80 0. 00 211. 10 0 00 18, 801. 82 87. 31 87. 31 88. 54 202. 39 0. 00 0. 00 615. 00 0. 00 75. 30 836. 00 1, 817. 23 20, 706. 36 36, 344.17 895. 37 PAGE 0004 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE 0 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE CP 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 747. 50 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 309. 00 4, 274. 34 . 45, 552. 54 357, 307. 39 90, 154. 08 1, 627. 00 1, 366. 20 3. 640. 00 14. 90 1, 242. 00 98, 044. 18 117.69 117.69 411. 46 1, 547. 61 0. 00 0. 00 110. 00 3, 500. 00 2, 224. 70 4, 176. 00 11, 969. 77 110, 131. 64 16. 6 12. 6 15. B 11. 0 16. 8 0. 0 16. 0 0. 0 93. 4 O. 0 16. 0 42.5 42. 5 17. 7 11.5 0. 0 0.0 84.8 0. 0 3. 2 16. 6 13. 1 15. 8 • 0 6 Q m 0 0 0 a d 0.00 190, 388.83 16.0 0. 00 2,604.63 25.5 0 F INANCE-FA134 TIt;E 19:24:24 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PACE_ 0005 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 001 GEN UAL FUND 1..202 FINANCE ADMIN DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4185 SOCIAL SEC(JR.ITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4303 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1 DIVISION TOTAL 3, 401. 00 3, 401. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 368. 00 238, 403. 00 39, 995. 00 39, 995. 00 2, 500. 00 10, 600. 00 250. 00 3, 652. 00 850. 00 8, 090. 00 25, 942. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 436. 80 0. 00 124. 55 0. 00 19, 896. 52 0. 00 873. 60 0. 00 215. 18 0. 00 38, 328. 32 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 5: 0. 00 3. 401. 00 0. 00 2, 527. 40 0.00 0.00 0. 00 21 5. 18- 0. 00 1, 368. 00 0. 00 200, 074. 68 0. 0 25. 6 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 16. 0 0. 00:r 258. 54 0. 00 39, 736. 46 0. 6 0. 00 258. 54 0. 00 39, 736. 46 0. 6 256. 03 1, 011. 32 0. 00 4. 00 0. 00 674. 00 1, 945. 35 304, 340. 00 21, 841. 87 1203 PERSONNEL DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 1 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4185 SOCIAL'SECURITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 61. 816. 00 927. 00 927. 00 3, 640. 00 226. 00 53. 00 67, 589. 00 14, 000. 00 3, 000. 00 17, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 7. 000. 00 ITVV! lav;;'' rrolftj 4' ? 7ai' TOW y%r ftr1?;,. 5. 035. 08 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5, 035. 08 175. 17 0. 00 175. 17 179. 96 309. 05 316. 19 1, 993. 04 115. 00 72,. 00 b. 00 °1, 348. 00 3, 844. 23 42, 431. 09 10, 266. 01 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 266. 01 220. 45 0. 00 220. 45 204. 85 654. 32 0. 00 2, 183. 81 12. 6 0. 00 8, 606. 96 18. 8 0.00 135.00 46.0 0. 00 3. 550. 00 1. 9 0.00 x50.00 0.0 0. 00 6, 742. 00 16. 6 0. 00 22, 097. 77 14. 8 0. 00 261, 908. 91 13. 9 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 81. 11 51, 549. 99 16. 6 927. 00 0. 0 927.00 0.0 3, 640. 00 0. 0 226. 00 0. 0 53. 00 0. 0 57, 322. 99 15. 1 13, 779. 55 1. 5 3. 000. 00 0. 0 16, 779. 55 1. 2 795. 15 20. 4 6, 264. 57 10. 5 'C,` )" t: Qr• 0 a fT 0 .......w+.w++r.r ..,.�. FINANCE-FA4;54 TIME 17:24'24 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 G=RAL FUND 1203 PERSONNEL CITY OF HERMOSA PEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. • • PAGE 0006 DATE 09/14/91 • 16. 07.: OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE is • 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4315 MEMBERSHIP 600.00 0.00 250. 00 O. 00 4316 TRAINING 2, 700. 00 O. 00 457. 00 O. 00 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 750. 00 O. 00 O. 00 0.00 4:320 MEDICAL EXAMS 20, 000. 00 658. 00 658. 00 O. 00 4327 AMID INCENTIVES 1, 200. 00 60. 00 160. 00 O. 00 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CMGS 2, 034. 00 169. 00 338. 00 O. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 35, 284. 00 1, 376. 01 2, 722. 17 81. 11 DIVISION TOTAL 119, 873. 00 6, 586. 26 • 13, 208. 63 81. 1 1 350. 00 2, 243. 00 750. 00 19, 342. 00 1, 040. 00 1, 696. 00 32, 480. 72 106, 583. 26 41. 6 16. 9 O. 0 3. 13. 3 16. 6 7. 9 11. 0 0 d 1205 CABLE TV DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT /J 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 15, 216.00 0.00 693.68 0.00 14, 522.32 4.5 /, 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 228.00 0.00 0.00 O. 00 228. 00 0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 228.00 0.00 0V'00 0.00 228.00 0.0 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 1,344.00 99. 75 227. 50 0.00 1, 116. 50 16.9 0 4155 SOCIAL SECURITY (F I C A) 83.00 1.45 3. 30 0.00 79. 70 3.9 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 240. 00 6. 18 14. 10 0. 00 225. 90 5. 8 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 339. 00 107. 38 938. 58 0. 00 16, 400. 42 5. 4 0 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 5, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 5, 000. 00 O. 0 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5, 000. 00 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 5, 000. 00 O. 0 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1206 DATA PROCESSING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 80,232.00 700. 00 1, 000. 00 400. 00 350. 00 500. 00 956. 00 3, 906. 00 26, 245. 00 DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 1.68 1. 66 43.30 655. 02 b. 4 O. 00 O. 00 O. 00 1, 000. 00 O. 0 95.00 95. 00 O. 00 305. 00 23.7 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 O. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 O. 0 80.00 160.00 O. 00 796. 00 16. 7 C' 176. 68 256. 68 43. 30 3, 606. 02 7. 6 284. 06 1, 195. 26 6, 429. 00 13, 370. 63 4 0 3. 30 25, 006. 44 4. 7 Q O. 00 66, 861. 17 16.6 0 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FIN$122E FA404 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TINE 19: 24: 24 PACE 0007 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 07/16!91 16. 011 OF YEAR COMPLETE F0111.) DIV (JOJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1206 DATA PROCESSING APPROPR IATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 ACATj0N/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4700 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 1200 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4004 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE .3776 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 500. 00 1, 203. 00 1, 203. 00 83. 133. 00 68, 764. 00 68, 764. 00 3, 700. 00 6. 500. 00 300. 00 620. 00 160. 00 800. 00 3. 107. 00 15, 187. 00 135, 000. 00 135, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 429. 00 5, 978. 67 5, 978. 67 646. 28 30. 79 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 259. 00 936. 07 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 13. 370. 83 13, 061. 57 13, 061. 57 676. 36 58. 22 0. 00 265. 00 0. 00 0. 00 518.00 1, 517. 58 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BAL.i1NCE 0. 00 500. 00 ' 0. 00 1. 203. 00 0. 00 1 , 203. 00 0. 00 69, 767. 17 0. 00 55, 702. 43 0. 00 55, 702. 43 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 302, 089. 00 13, 343. 74 1207 BUS LICENSE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4187 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL yy�� t t1^* w� 6. •` 6D,Y V: rMf 'h 'L; � If � 821549. 00 525. 00 1, 238. 00 1, 238. 00 0. 00 393. 00 85. 943. 00 25. 00 170. 00 195. 00 6. 808. 43 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 32. 77 0. 00 6, 841. 20 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 27, 949. 98 0. 00 13, 336. 35 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 65. 50 0. 00 13, 401. 85 19. 60 0. 00 19. 60 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3, 023. 64 6. 441. 78 300. 00 355. 00 160. 00 800. 00 2, 589. 00 13, 669. 42 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 16. 0 18. 9 18. 9 18.2 0.8 0. 0 42. 7 0. 0 0. 0 16. 6 9. 9 135, 000. 00 0. 0 135, 000. 00 0. 0 274, 139. 02 9. 2 69, 212. 65 16. 1 525. 00 0. 0 1,238.00 0.0 1, 238. 00 0. 0 65. 50- 0. 0 393. 00 0. 0 72, 541. 15 15. 5 5.40 78.4 170.00 0.0 175. 40 10. 0 a co e ci a et FINANCE -FA 454 TIME 19 : 24: 2 4 FUND DIV OPJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 1207 BUS LICENSE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) P698 0008 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPR IATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. Q '1 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 520. 00 84.84 104. 55 0. 00 415. 45 20. 1 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 41600.00 218.51 467.39 0.00 4,132.61 10.1 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 165.00 0.00 17.33 0.00 147.67 10.5 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 110.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 106.00 3.6 4 315 MEMBERSHIP 50. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 50. 00 0. 0 4316 TRAINING 1,366.00 0.00 318.00 0.00 1,048.00 23.2 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 500.00 0.0 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS 4,695.00 391. 00 782. 00 0. 00 3, 913. 00 16.6 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 12, 006.00 698.35 1,693.27 0.00 10, 312.73 14.1 13400 EQUIPMENT Al 5401 EGUIPMENT-LESS THAN $500 230.00 229. 49 229. 49 0. 00 0. 51 99. 7 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 230.00 229. 49 229. 49 0. 00 0. 51 99. 7 DIVISION TOTAL 93, 374. 00 7, 769. 04 1 5, 344. 21 0. 00 83, 029. 79 15. 5 1208 GEN APPROP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES !'!J 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 28, 043. 00 2, 289. 00 4, 578. 00 0. 00 23, 465. 00 16. 3 4110 VACATION/SICF< PAY OFF 421.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 421.00 0.0 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 421. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 421.00 0. 0 t 41 135 SOC IAL SECURITY (F I C A) 0. 00 33. 19 66. 38 0. 00 66. 38- 0. 0 4139 MEDICARE BENEFITS 407. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 407. 00 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 29, 292. 00 2, 322. 19 4, 644. 38 0. 00 24, 647. 62 15. 8 It 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 42.01 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 26, 000. 00 747. 42 1;325.79 0. 00 24, 674. 21 5. 0 ') OBJECT SUBTOTAL 26, 000. 00 747. 42 1, 325. 79 0. 00 24, 674. 21 5. 0 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER ff) .4304 TELEPHONE 286. 00 42. 95 53. 32 0.00 232. 68 18. 6 930:1 OFFICE OPER 53)FPLIES 350. 00 5, 824. 36- 12,512.61- 0. 00 12, 862. 61 3575. 0 4316 TRAINING 200. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 200. 00 0. 0 !t 4396 TRSFP OUT -INS USER CMOS 888.00 74.00 148. 00 0. 00 740. 00 16. 6 (OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 724. 00 _ 5, 707. 41- 12, 311. 29- 0. 00 14, 035.29 714. 1 0 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 0. OO 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 .1 .1 0 1 ,1 F INANCE—FA454 i ri•;I= 19:24:24 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL 1212 EMP BENEFITS 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4188 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0009 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/1.E/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 57, 016. 00 2, 637. 80— DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 700, 000. 00 700, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 700, 000.00 1213 RETIREMENT DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4180 RETIREMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 127, 904. 00 1, 127, 904. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 1, 127, 904.00 1214 PROSP EXP DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4322 UNCLASSIFIED 4 397 3.5% ANTICIPATED SAVINGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 374, 624. 00 369, 849. 00- 4, 775. 00 18, 423. 82 18, 423. 82 18, 423. 82 95, 924. 43 95, 924. 43 95, 924. 43 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 775. 00 0. 00 1299 BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 340, 054. 00 340, 054. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 340, 054.00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3, 211, 508.00 "* 2101 POLICE DEPT: POLICE 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 578,239.00 2,4 30, OBO. 45 30, 080. 45 30, 080. 45 202, 254. 42 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 6, 341. 12— 0. 00 104, 560. 29 104, 560. 29 104, 560. 29 95, 924. 43 95, 924. 43 95, 924. 43 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 63, 357.12 11 . 1 595, 439. 71 595, 439. 71 0. 00 595, 439. 71 0. 00 1, 031, 979. 57 0. 00 1, 031, 979. 57 Q 14. 9 14. 9 14. 9 • 8. 5 8.5 0. 00 1, 031, 979. 57 8. 5 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 39, 080. 45 39, 080. 45 0. 00 0.00 39, 080. 45 0. 00 354, 059. 58 124. 41 43, 111. 80 86, 044. 14 t.4 •,••, . r: 374, 624. 00 369, 849. 00- 4, 775. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 4, 775. 00 0. 0 300, 973. 55 300, 973. 55 300, 973. 55 2, 857, 324. 01 0. 00 492, 194. 86 i• fry, aif :4E 11£,:t E,./3 r. a C 11.4 11.4 11.4 C) 11.0 F INAf 'C.E—FA 154 TIME 19:24:24 FUND DIV Or,. JT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2101 FOLICE DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 4101) SPECIAL DUTY PAY 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 41.09 COURT TIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4114 POLICE RESERVES 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL. 4118 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 4105 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4107 UNIFORMS 4109 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/BOTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4206 PRISONER MAINTENANCE 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 60TOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4312 TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 4313 TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC 431.5 ME=MBERSHIP 4316 TRAININ9 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TR! PR OUT—INS USER CHG3 OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ 0400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT—LESS TI -IAN $500 5402 E_QUIPME:NT—MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 APPROPRIATION POLICE 1, 618, 301. 00 25, 200. 00 35, 000. 00 100, 800. 00 20, 000. 00 34, 076. 00 34, 076. 00 7, 800. 00 16, 000. 00 9, 065. 00 51000. 00 1, 294. 00 38, 500. 00 14, 980. 00 2. 538, 331. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 146, 677. 66 292, 891. 72 2, 100. 00 4, 200. 00 2, 784. 87 8, 388. 54 13, 636. 37 23, 524. 81 1, 407. 59 2, 002. 49 0. 00 0. 00 9, 052. 78 9. 636. 66 560. 00 1, 162. 00 948. 00 1, 688. 50 541. 87 1, 198. 47 90. 24 157. 92 1, 618. 34 3, 187. 85 2, 454. 29 4, 689. 97 93. 50 176. 72 225, 077. 31 438, 949. 79 ) 116, 923. 00 8, 204. 59 28, 668. 18 32, 851. 00 0. 00 0. 00 149, 774. 00 8, 204. 59 28, 668. 18 0. 00 24. 56 24. 56 28, 000. 00 4, 091. 80 4, 666. 45 37, 900. 00 2, 926. 92 4, 930. 03 10, 663. 00 721. 62 887. 93 4, 112. 00 333. 81 333. 81 7, 500. 00 1, 847. 75 1, 873. 55 21, 175. 00 1, 795. 03 3, 566. 92 27, 000. 00 3. 288. 33 5, 220. 38 22, 575. 00 1,637. 95 1, 682. 95 8, 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 660. 00 35. 00 110. 00 1.4, 000. 00 99. 10 484. 10 4, 500. 00 , 0. 00 0. 00 402, 998. 00 33, 583. 00 67, 166. 00 590, 588. 00 50, 384. 87 90, 946. 68 9, 603. 00 9, 709. 93 10, 204. 35 41, 893. 00 3, 491. 53 4, 543. 39 9, 984. 00 0. 00 0. 00 PAGE 0010 DATE 09/16/91 16. 0Z OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE: 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 241. 99 0. 00 241. 99 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 287. 20 801. 05 0. 00 0. 00 409. 79 0. 00 186. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 684. 04 0. 00 11, 177. 68 0. 00 1, 325, 409. 28 21, 000. 00 26, 611. 46 77, 2.75. 19 17, 997. 51 34, 076. 00 24, 439. 34 6, 638. 00 14, 311. 50 7, 866. 53 4, 842. 08 1, 893. 85- 33, 568. 04 14, 803. 28 2, 099, 139. 22 83, 254. 62 32, 851. 00 121. 105. 82 24. 56- 23, 046. 35 32. 168. 92 9, 780. 07 3, 778. 19 5, 216. 66 17, 608. 08 21, 593. 62 20, 892. O5 8, 500. 00 1, 050. 00 13, 515. 90 4, 500. 00 335, 832. 00 497, 957. 28 Q) is • • 18.0 16. 6 23.9 0 23. 3 10. 0 0.0 0 28. 2 14. 8 10.5 • 13. 3.1 246.3 011' 12. 8 1. 1 17.3 01' 24.5 t O. 0 19. 1 O. 0 17.6 Q� 15. 1 8. 3 8.1 0, 30. 4 16. 8 20.0 7. 4 O. 0 6.6 �Fv 3. 4 O. 0 16.6 15. 6 Q; 601. 35— 106. 2 26, 171.93 37. 5 9, 964. 00 0. 0 Q/ Qr • s O A 'a 1 FINE?ICE-FA454 TINi:; 19 24' 24 FUND DIV OL'JT DF=SCR 001 GEMERP,L FUND 2101 POLICE 7.400 EGUIPMENT OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 6'C0 L_EAEE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ DIVISION TOTAL_ DEPARTMENT TO rm.. 2201 FIRE DEPT: DEPT: 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4103 REGULAR SALAFRIES/SAFETY 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4108 FLSA OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4119 FITNESS INCENTIVE 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4187 UNIFORMS 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4204 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 4327 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 APPROPRIATION POLICE 61, 480. 00 159. 766. 00 159, 766. 00 3, 499, 939. 00 3, 499, 939. 00 FIRE 45. 198. 00 945, 721. 00 106, 500. 00 65, 678. 00 14, 864. 00 14, 864. 00 6. 000. 00 0. 00 21, 726. 00 3. 599. 00 1. 224, 150. 00 27. 566. 00 27. 566. 00 2. 750. 00 3. 300. 00 0. 00 7. 200. 00 2. 500. 00 1. 000. 00 650.-00 2. 500. 00 2, 000. 00 110, 992. 00 132, 892. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. • 13, 201. 51 0. 00 0. 00 296. 868. 28 ,r 296, 868. 28 3, 694. 50 78, 352. 09 15, 661. 25 12, 578. 90 0. 00 815. 60 0. 00 289. 17 450. 00 0. 00 111. 841. 51 481.20 481.20 276. 12 116. 65 0. 00 ..759. 60 129. 93 28. 03 300. 00 0. 00 0. 00 9. 249. 00 10, 859. 33 ,41$•, t!i' ti'' T ��;:'91 1St . 41,'"',1)tf. , • V ,StI, Ai r1,,V :4""," a 4 • . , . } 14, 747. 74 37. 500. 89 37. 500. 89 610, 813. 28 610. 813. 28 7. 389. 00 156, 214. 20 34, 27}0. 77 17. 966. 63 0. 00 3. 949. 04 2, 950. 00 622. 42 900. 00 0. 00 224, 262. 06 12, 723. 57 12, 723. 57 286. 49 182. 92 424. 77 1.2_49. 10 327. 75 28. 03 300. 00 0. 00 0. 00 18. 498. 00 21. 297. 06 PACE 0011 DATE 09/16/91 16. C4 OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNL=NC BALANCE 11. 177. 68 0. 00 0. 00 35. 554. 58 122, 265.11 122, 265. 11 13, 103. 71 2. 876, 022. 01 13, 103. 71 2, 876. 022. 01 42. 1 23. 4 23. 4 17. 8 17. 8 0. 00 37, 809. 00 16. 3 0. 00 789, 506. 80 16. 5 0. 00 72, 229. 23 32. 1 0. 00 47, 711. 37 27. 3 0. 00 14.864. 00 0. 0 0. 00 10, 914. 96 26. 5 0. 00 3. 050. 00 49. 1 0.00 622. 42- 0.0 0. 00 20, 826. 00 4. 1 0. 00 3, 599. 00 0. 0 0. 00 999. 887. 94 18. 3 0. 00 14, 842. 43 46. 1 0. 00 14. 842. 43 46. 1 0. 00 174. 72 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 174. 72 p".Y• ,y 2. 463. 51 10. 4 2, 942. 36 10. 8 424. 77- 0. 0 5. 950. 90 17. 3 2. 172. 25 13. 1 971. 97 2. 8 350. 00 46. 1 2. 500. 00 0. 0 2. 000. 00 0. 0 92. 494. 00 16. 6 111, 420. 22 16. 1 dl' • Q' 0 0 e CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FIMAMCE-.FAL54 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND) PA•^E 0012 T IMF 19: 24: 24 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/1,./91 16. 0% OF YEAR COI1rLETE FUND DIV ORJT DFSCR 001 GENERAL. FUND 2201 FIR!_ APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: FIRE 'x•'•00 EQUIPMENT 5107. EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 0,02 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6500 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL. DEPARTMENT TOTAL. 2401 ANIMAL CONTROL 2, 400. 00 6, 490. 00 8, 890. 00 82, 541. 00 82, 541. 00 1, 476, 039. 00 1, 476, 039. 00 DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALAP,IES/MISC 410.6 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 41135 SOCIAL SECt1RITY(F 1 C A) 4187 UNIFORMS 41.89 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 1251 CONTRACT SERVICE/•ODVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4209 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4319 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 99, 906. 00 1, 100. 00 1, 498. 00 1, 498. 00 400. 00 0. 00 400. 00 896. 00 105, 698. 00 1, 500. 00 6, 000. 00 7, 500. 00 700. 00 1, 700. 00 600. 00 1, 600. 00 2, 200. 00 50. 00 150. 00 500. 00 11, 797. 00 19, 297. 00 397. 98 0. 00 397. 98 0. 00 0. 00 397. 98 0. 00 397. 98 25, 003. 60 25, 003. 60 123, 580. 02 'T 283, 684. 27 123, 580. 02 283, 684. 27 6, 971. 93 19. 44 0. 00 1. 68 45. 90 32. 07 0. 00 0. 00 7, 071. 02 22. 00 519. 35 541. 35 96. 01 373. 79 0. 00 '106. 35 100. 00 0. 00 ,O. 00 0. 00 983. 00 1, 659. 15 13, 324?23 225. 90 0. 00 713. 46 66. 30 65. 57 0. 00 0. 00 14, 395. 46 166. 34 519. 35 689. 69 110. 53 375. 82 0. 00 195. 84 100. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 966. 00 2, 748. 19 432. 99 0. 00 432. 99 0. 00 0. 00 1, 569. 03 6, 490. 00 8, 059. 03 57, 537. 40 57, 537. 40 607. 71 1, 191, 747. 02 607. 71 1, 191, 747. 02 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 238. 51 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 238. 51 34. 6 0. 0 9.3 30. 2 30. 2 19. 2 19. 2 86, 581. 77 13. 3 874. 10 20. 5 1, 498. 00 0. 0 784. 54 17. 6 333. 70 16. 5 65. 57- 0. 0 400. 00 0. 0 896. 00 0. 0 91, 302. 54 13. 6 1, 333. 66 1 1 . 0 5, 480. 65 8. 6 6, 814. 31 9. 1 589. 47 15. 7 1, 085. 67 36. 1 600. 00 0. 0 1, 404. 16 12. 2 2, 100. 00 4. 5 50. 00 0. 0 150. 00 0. 0 500. 00 0. 0 9, 831. 00 16. 6 16, 310. 30 15. 4 4, G • 0 Q�) 0 0 0 0 01,14 4 F I NP,NCE-FA454 1 IMF. 19: 2_1:24 FUND DIV OEJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 2.101 ANIMAL CONTROL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PACE 013 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/091 16.07: OF YEAR•. COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: ANIMAL REGULTN MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 3400 EQUIPMENT 5101 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 1.050.00 0. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1.050.00 0. 00 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 0. 00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 1 DIVISION TOTAL 133, 545.00 9:271.52 Y DEPARTMENT TOTAL 133, 545. 00 9,271.52 2701 CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT: DISASTER PREP 1 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4103 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 26, 373. 00 2.241.00 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 396.00 0.00 1 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 396.00 0.00 4187 UNIFORMS 175. 00 14. 58 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 27, 340.00 2,255.58 t 47200 CONTRACT SERVICES . 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4,249.00 409.95 t 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 3:448.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 7,697.00 409. 95 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION) TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL. 3101 MEDIANS 4'100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 2, 725. 00 200. 00 3, 600. 00 3, 086. 00 9, 611. 00 2, soo. 00 2, 500. 00 47, 148. 00 47, 148. 00 DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 51, 729. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 257. 00 257. 00 0. 00 0.00 2,922.53 2,922.53 4, 169. 54 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 829. 34 17, 829. 34 4, 482. 00 0. 00 194. 63 29. 16 4, 705. 79 740. 13 0. 00 740. 13 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 514. 00 514. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 238. 51 238. 51 1, 050. 00 1, 050. 00 . 0. 00 0. 00 115,477./5 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 13. 5 115, 477. 15 13. 5 0. 00 21, 891. 00 0. 00 396. 00 0. 00 201. 37 0. 00 145. 84 0. 00 22, 634. 21 0. 00 3, 508. 87 0. 00 3, 448. 00 0. 00 6, 956. 87 0. 00 2, 725. 00 0. 00 200. 00 0. 00 3, 600. 00 0. 00 2, 572., 00 0. 00 9, 097. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5, 959. 92 0. 00 5, 959. 92 0. 00 8..336.49 0. 00 16. 9 0. 0 49. 1 16. 6 17. 2 17. 4 0. 0 9. 6 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 16. 6 5. 3 2, 500. 00 0. 0 2, 500. 00 0. 0 41, 188.08 12.6 41, 188. 08 12. 6 43, 392. 51 1 p, r2M,,117,;L'j.a: f.7 ,75iY ., .,4� i$: 16. 1 i" :0. 0 c 43 Q 0 0 0 0 a 0 4 F INAHCE--FA4^4 TIML 19:24:24 FUND DIV OGJU DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 3101 MEDIANS CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 PACE 0014 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMFLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE DEPT: ST/HWY/ ST. DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4.111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4169 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251. CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 43?6 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 3103 ET MAINTENANCE 300. 00 776. 00 776. 00 287. 00 53. 868. 00 50. 000. 00 1, 300. 00 51. 300. 00 8, 800. 00 5. 000. 00 350. 00 500. 00 5. 496. 00 20, 146. 00 125, 314. 00 DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 41.89 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 154. 083. 00 500. 00 2,311.00 2,311.00 0. 00 729. 00 159. 934. 00 60, 250. 00 60, 250. 00 14, 000. 00 4, 600. 00 13. 700. 00 600. 00 0. 00 0. 00 110. 70 0. 00 4. 280. 24 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 981. 81 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 458. 00 1, 439. 81 5. 720. 05 44. 93 0. 00 110. 70 O. 00 8, 492. 12 0. 00 255. 07 0. 00 776. 00 0. 00 665. 30 0. 00 287. 00 0. 00 45. 375. 138 0. 00 0. 00 50, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 300. 00 0. 00 0. 00 511300. 00 981. 81 0. 00 1. 04 0. 00 91.6. 00 1189S. 65 10. 390. 97 12. 589. 20 24, BOO. 95 186. 59 186.59 0.00 0. 00 110. 70 110. 70 5B. 95 117.89 0.00 0.00 12, 945. 44 25, 216. 13 6,743.68 6,743.68 67743.68 6,743.68 3, 063. 20 3, 065. 20 275. 95 553. 81 314. 95 553. 10 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 818. 19 0. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 00 348. 96 0. 00 500. 00 0. 00 4, 580. 00 0. 00 16, 247. 15 0. 00 114, 923. 03 0. 00 129, 282. 05 0. 00 313. 41 0. 00 2, 31 1. 00 0. 00 2, 200. 30 0. 00 117. 89- 0. 00 729. 00 0. 00 134, 717. 87 0. 00 73, 506. 32 0. 00 73, 506. 32 286. 44 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10. 648. 36 4, 041. 19 13, 146. 90 600. 00 a.' • 7- 14. 9 0. 0 14. 2 O. 0 15.7 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 11. 1 0. 0 0. 2 0. 0 16. 6 9. 4 B. 2 16. 0 37. 3 0. 0 4. 7 0. 0 0. 0 15. 7 6. 4 6. 4 23. 9 12. 1 4.0 0. 0 v Q • eft 1) 0 0 Q1 1 f 1 4 I FINANCE---FA4J4 TIME 19:24:24 FUND DIV OBJT DFSCR 001 GLNLRAL FUND 310:3 ST MAINTENANCE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PACE 0015 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMF"LETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: ST/HWY/ST. DRAIN 1300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL. DIVISION TOTAL 59, 304. 00 92, 204. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 4, 942. 00 8, 598. 10 9, 684. 00 14, 061. 11 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 844. 00 20, 844. 00 1,736.78 1,736.78.t 353, 232. 00 30, 024. 00 3104 TRAFFIC SAFETY DEPT: ST/HWY/ST.DRAIN 1100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTFHIER 4303 u ILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CMGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 97, 996. 00 500. 00 1, 470. 00 1, 470. 00 101, 436. 00 12, 000. 00 8, 400. 00 20, 400. 00 6, 365. 00 37, 600. 00 1, 570. 00 1, 300. 00 200.00- 300. 00 9, 986. 00 57, 121. 00 10. 096. 00 10, 096. 00 8, 268. 11 0. 00 0. 00 477. 50 8, 765. 61 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 446. 88 4, 414. 15 210. 22 0. 00 60. 00 0. 00 832. 00 5, 963. 25 855. 11 855.11 3,473.56 3,473.56 49, 494. 48 16, 248. 05 O. 00 O. 00 844. 30 17, 092. 35 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 446. 88 4, 615. 39 350. 16 0. 00 60. 00 0. 00 1, 664. 00 7, 136. 43 2, 551. 51 2, 551. 51 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 286. 44 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 286. 44 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 154. 60 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. CO 0. 00 154. 80 0.00 0.00 49, 420. 00 77, 656. 45 0. 00 0. 00 17, 370. 44 17, 370. 44 303, 451. 08 81, 747. 95 500. 00 1,470.00 625. 70 84, 343. 65 12, 000. 00 8, 400. 00 20, 400. 00 5, 918. 12 33, 029. 81 1, 219. 84 1, 300. 00 260. 00- 300. 00 8, 322. 00 49, 829. 77 7, 544. 49 7, 544. 49 • 16. 6 15. 5 0. 0 0. 0 16. 6 16. 6 14. 0 16. 5 0. 0 0. 0 57. 4 16. 6 0 tift 0.0 0.0 0.0 414 7. 0 12. 6 22. 3 0. 0 4 30. 0 O. 0 16.6 ' A 12. 7 4 25. 2 25.2 4 F INArJCE--F A454 TIME 19: 21: 24 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4101 PLANNING 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 1155 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 119 MEDICARE PEMEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 APPROPRIATION 189, 053. 00 667, 599. 00 DEPT: PLANNING 1200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1201 CONTRACT SERVICE/FRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 1205 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 1313 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4376 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CMGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 3100 EQUIPMENT 1401 EC1UIPMENT-LESS THAN 3500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 219, 516. 00 300. 00 3, 293. 00 3, 293. 00 9, 000. 00 642. 00 2. 379. 00 238, 42.3. 00 7, 975. 00 7. 975. 00 1, 832. 00 17. 050. 00 242. 00 630. 00 855. 00 1. 800. 00 1, 300. 00 8. 592. 00 32, 301. 00 2. 000. 00 2, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 280, 699.00 4102 PLANNING COMM DEPT: PLANNING 1200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6, 000. 00 6. 000. 00 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 5. 500. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 15. 583. 97 511 928. 02 26. 780. 29 86. 665. 74 17,476. 50 32, 401. 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 671.88 1,378.13 212. 01'' 374.38 41.65 85.44 18, 402. 04 34, 239. 2.1 1,579.75 1,875.06 1,579.75 1,875.06 249. 42 2.99. 21 419. 01 791. 04 0. 00 5. 84 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 716. 00 11432. 00 1; 384. 43 2, 568. 09 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 21. 366. 22 267. 00 267. 00 323. 27 38, 682. 36 414. 00 414. 00 469. 37 PAGE 0016 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 7. 154. 80 441. 24 162, 117.91 14.2 580, 492. 02 13. 0 0. 00 187, 114. 74 14. 7 0.00 300.00 0.0 0. 00 3, 293. 00 0. 0 0. 00 3, 293. 00 0. 0 0. 00 7, 621. 87 15. 3 0.00 267.62 58.3 0.00 2.293. 56 3. 5 0. 00 2.04, 183. 79 14. 3 0. 00 6. 099. 94 23. 5 0. 00 6. 099. 94 23. 5 0. 00 86. 60 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 218. 42 0. 00 0. 00 305. 02 1, 028. 38 1, 028. 38 1, 333. 40 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1,532.79 16.3 16, 172. 36 5. 1 236. 16 2. 4 630. 00 0. 0 815. 00 4. 6 1,501.58 12.1 1, 300. 00 0. 0 7, 160. 00 16. 6 29, 427. 89 B. 8 971.62 51.4 971.62 51 . 4 240, 683.24 14.2 5. 586. 00 5, 586. 00 5, 030. 63 6.9 6.9 8. 5 IL' O 0 m CO a c n 6 a • y 1 9 4 1 7 i - F MANCE T1M: 19:24:24 FUND DIV OB JT D!T.SCR 001 GENERAL FUND 4102 PLANNING COMM CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 APPROPRIATION DEPT: PLANNING 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4316 TRAINING 431.7 CONFERENCE EXPENSE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4201 BUILDING 228. 00 1, 320. 00 7, 048. 00 13, 048. 00 293, 747. 00 DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENP 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CAIIH IN 41115 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 4251 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTEN/.NCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CMGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EOUIPMENT 5401 EGUIPMENT-LESS THAN 1300 OBJECT SUBTOTAL. DIVISION TOTAL 245, 103. 00 500. 00 3, 677. 00 3, 677. 00 0. 00 2, 602. 00 255, 559. 00 69, 709. 00 900. 00 70, 609. 00 2, 400. 00 7, 149. 00 0. 00 980. 00 750. 00 300. 00 2, 000. 00 1, 600. 00 32. 302. 00 47, 481. 00 688. 00 688. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 323. 27 0. 00 0. 00 469. 37 590.27 883.37 21, 956. 49 19, 328. 60 358. 02 0. 00 0. 00 174. 50 0. 00 19, 861. 12 4, 595. 70 0. 00 4, 595. 70 350. 94 423. 42 0. 00 71. 59 20. 58 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 692. 00 3, X58. 53 PACE . 0017 DATE 09/16/91 16. 0% OF YEAR CONFLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 228. 00 1, 320. 00 6, 578. 63 0. 00 12, 164. 63 39, 565. 73 1,333.40 38, 474. 82 499. 88 0. 00 0. 00 348. 46 0. 00 39, 323. 16 4, 711.96 0. 00 4, 711. 96 430. 81 760. 71 0. 00 138. 00 20. 58 25. 00 485. 00 0. 00 5, 384. 00 7, 244. 10 688. 47 688. 47 688. 47 688. 47 374, 337., 00_ 28, 703. 82 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7, 778. 66 0. 00 7, 778. 66 0. 00 25. 45 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 _0. 00 0. 00 25. 45 0. 00 0. 00 51, 967.69 7, 804. 11 0.0 0.0 6. 6 6. 7 252, 847. 87 13. 9 206, 628. 18 0. 12 3, 677. 00 3, 677. 00 348. 46- 2, 602. 00 216, 235. 84 57, 218. 38 900. 00 58, 118. 38 15. 6 99. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 15. 3 17. 9 0. 0 17.6 1,969. 19 17.9 6, 362. 84 10. 9 0. 00 0. 0 842. 00 14. 0 729. 42 2. 7 275. 00 8. 3 1, 515. 00 24. 2 1, 600. 00 0. 0 26, 918. 00 16.6 40, 211.45 15.3 0. 47- 100. 0 0. 47- 100. 0 314, 565.2.0 15.9 r, ► r' 0 0 0 0 0 0 (a FIW..'ICE-FA4' 4 TIM'= 1 .� . 2.3 : 4 FUND PTV OBJT DFSCR 001 C_:' IE RAL FUND 4202 rur 11103 ADI1IN • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 013/01/91 TO 08/31/91 APPROPRIATION DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/F_NF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 9102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICU. PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL. CASH IN 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4187 UNIFORMS 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE_ 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 4396 TRSFR OUT --INS USER CROS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 188, 935. 00 0. 00 2, 834. 00 2. 834. 00 0. 00 7, 570. 00 1,861.00 204, 034. 00 1, 500. 00 1, 500. 00 5, 950. 00 10, 000. 00 0. 00 1. 250. 00 882. 00 840. 00 2. 000. 00 800. 00 50, 891. 00 72, 613. 00 278, 147. 00 4204 BLDG MAINT DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES .4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 41.10 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 41.11 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4187 UNIFORMS 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 158, 067. 00 1, 685. 00 2. 371. 00 2, 371. 00 200.00 37. 00 164, 731. 00 22. 656. 00 22, 656. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 14, 749. 08 29, 342. 82 0. 00 8. 87 0. 00 0. 00 110. 70 110. 70 267. 88 525. 07 494. 68 494.68 0. 00 0. 00 15, 622. 34 30, 482. 14 1,582.50 1,712.69 1. 582. 50 1, 712. 69 740. 75 850. 70 1, 090. 48 1, 921. 06 40. 03 40. 03 37. 54. 101. 03 20. 88 20. 88 0. 00 0. 00 12. 50 12. 50 0. 00 0. 00 4, 241. 00 8, 482. 00 6. 183. 18 11, 428. 20 23, 388. 02 43, 623. 03 13, 161. 27 323. 00 0. 00 .4110. 70 16. 68 0. 00 13, 611. 65 26, 252. 92 342. 82 0. 00 679. 70 33. 36 0. 00 27. 308. 80 PACE 0018 DATE 09/16/91 16. 0% OF YEAR COP:PLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 159, 592. 18 8. 87- 2. 834. 00 2. 723. 30 525.07- 7, 075.32 1, 861. 00 173, 551. 66 212.69- 212.69- 5, .12.69- 212.69- 5, 099. 30 8. 078. 94 40. 03- 1, 148. 97 861. 12 840. 00 11907. 50 800. 00 42, 409. 00 61, 184. 80 234, 523. 97 15. 5 0. 0 0. 0 3. 9 0. 0 6. 5 0. 0 14. 9 114. 1 114. 1 14. 2 19. 2 0.0 8. 0 2. 3 0. 0 O. 6 0. 0 16. 6 15.7 15. 6 0.00 131,814.08 16.6 0. 00 1, 342. 18 20. 3 0. 00 2, 371. 00 0. 0 0. 00 1, 691. 30 28. 6 0. 00 166. 64 16. 6 0. 00 37. 00 0. 0 0. 00 137, 422. 20 16. 5 280. 00 460. 00 0. 00 22, 196. 00 2. 0 280. 00 460. 00 0. 00 22. 196. 00 2. 0 et • • • w, -1 4 1 7 4 q FINANCE-'-FA434 TINE 19.21 : 2 4 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 001 GENERAL. FUND 4.701 L)LDG M41NT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 00/31/91 APPROPRIATION DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENE 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 4321 BUILDING SAFETY/SECURITY 43=6 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 5100 ECUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS TFIAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE_ THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL. 94, 500. 00 40, 000. 00 968. 00 600. 00 200. 00 5, 000. 00 29, 107. 00 170, 375. 00 0. 00 2, 100. 00 2, 100. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 9, 732. 94 2, 415. 26 153. 41 255. 78 0. 00 283. 80 2, 42.6. 00 15, 267. 19 ,r 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 359, 862. 00 29, 158. 84 4205 EQUIP SERVICE_ DEPT: CONST/ENGIN/ENF 41.00 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4109 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL_ 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUDES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5402 EQUIPMENT-MMORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6500 LEASE PAYMENTS 107, 270. 00 600. 00 1, 609. 00 1, 609. 00 0. 00 0. 00 454. 00 111, 542. 00 4, 725. 00 1, 815. 00 1, 815. 00 200. 00 11, 779. 00 20, 334. 00 10, 207. 00 10, 207. 00 9, 416. 73 62. 90 0. 00 110. 70 0. 00 31. 03 0. 00 9, 621. 36 208. 85 194. 00 218. 89 0. 00 982. 00 1, 603. 74 9, 732. 94 2, 802. 48 265. 16 255. 78 0. 00 283. 80 4, 852. 00 18, 192. 16 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 PACE 0019 DATE 09:16/.91 16. 04 OF YEAR COIIPL_ETE Q ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE X Qr 0. 00 619. 64 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 619. 64 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 45, 960. 96 619. 64 18, 122. 35 62. 90 0. 00 110. 70 0. 00 61. 15 0. 00 18, 357. 10 208. 85 208. 41 218. 89 0. 00 1, 964. 00 2, 600. 15 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5, 016. 00 417. 96 .Yt !.Yf144;'"Z.t4.'Ir,Jf1(7X7'. hAvd{ep'tt -+ 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 10, 365. 23 10, 365. 23 835. 92 0. 00 84, 767. 06 36, 577. 88 702. 84 344. 22 200. 00 4, 716. 20 24, 255. 00 151, 563. 20 0. 00 2, 100. 00 2, 100. 00 10. 2 8.5 27. 3 42. 6 0. 0 5. 6 16. 6 11. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 313, 281. 40 12. 9 89, 147. 65 537. 10 1, 609. 00 1, 498. 30 0. 00 61. 15- 454. 00 93, 184. 90 16. 8 10. 4 0. 0 6. 8 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 16. 4 4, 516.'15 4. 4 1, 606. 59 11. 4 1, 596. 11 12. 0 200. 00 0. 0 9, 815. 00 16. 6 17, 733. 85 12. 7 158. 23- 101. 5 158. 23- 101. 5 4,180.08 16.6 e fry 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0) J 0 0 FINANCE -FAan4 IMF. 19:._... 21 FUND DIV OBJr DESCR 001 GENERAL FUND 6000 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL. DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4601. COMM RESOURCES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 4165 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL V CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PACE 0 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 00/16/71 16. 0% OF YEAR COf r-LETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE is V 5, 016. 00 417. 96 147, 099. 00 1, 159, 445. 00 DEPT: COMM PROMOTION 42.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 183, 878. 00 1, 000. 00 2, 758. 00 2, 758. 00 69, 803. 00 4, 328. 00 2, 133. 00 266, 658. 00 60, 750. 00 60, 750. 00 11, 643. 06 92, 893. 74 14, 892. 80 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 8, 095. 10 217. 13 501. 88 23, 706. 91 9,503.90 9,503.90 nfj 1300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4302 ADVERTISING 13,000.00 25.00 4304 TELEPHONE 4, 600. 00 274. 97 9 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 9, 500. 00 175. 80 1 308 PROGRAM MATERIALS 12, 500. 00 966. 20 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 750.00 27. 42 0 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 350. 00 4. 00 4315 MEMBERSHIP 700.00 0. 00 4316 TRAINING 1, 000. 00 0. 00 i9 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 1, 600. 00 0. 00 4396 TNSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 20, 233. 00 1, 686. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 64, 233. 00 3, 159. 39 0 0 `7400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5102 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS 6900 LEASE PAYMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 2, 000. 00 2, 000. 00 4, 000. 00 835. 92 0. 00 21, 793. 17 10, 365. 23 163, 344. 85 18, 788. 98 29, 783. 49 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 163. 49 444. 33 1, 064. 16 48, 455. 47 t., 4, 180. 08 16. 6 114, 940. 60 21. 8 977, 31 1. 17 15.7 S' 0. 00 154, 094. 51 16. 1 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 a 0. 00 2, 753. 00 0. 0 0. 00 2, 758. 00 0. 0 0. 00 52, 639. 51 24. 5 4fi 0. 00 3, 883. 67 10. 2 0. 00 1, 068. 84 49. 8 0. 00 218, 202. 53 18. 1 11, 544. 65 1, 248. 00 47, 957. 35 21.0 11, 544. 65 1, 248. 00 47, 957. 35 21. 0 25. 00 3, 479. 24 9, 495. 76 26. 9 305. 05 0. 00 4, 294. 95 6. 6 1, 885. 39 2.32. 74 7, 381. 87 22.2 3, 267. 63 457. 87 8, 774. 50 29. 8 93. 83 0. 00 656. 17 12. 5 4. 00 0. 00 346.00 1. 1 45 0. 00 0. 00 700.00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 1, 600. 00 0. 0 6 3, 372. 00 0. 00 16, 861. 00 16. 6 8, 952. 90 4, 169. 85 51, 110. 25 20. 4 (33 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 0 -, 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 • 4 4 .1 F l f l 444 Ei-FA 4 54 TINE 17: 2 4: ;?4 FUNO DIV OBJ D1 SCR 001 GENGUAL. FUND DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL. 6:01 PARKS CITY OF HERMLISA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PACE 0021 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16;91 16. 01 OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPR IATION 395, 641. 00 395, 641. 00 DEPT: PARKS/REC 1100 PERSONAL. SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 41t0 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4185 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE. 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4216 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL. DEPARTMENT TOTAL. FUND TOTAL 80, 566. 00 500. 00 1, 208. 00 1, 208. 00 0. 00 287. 00 83, 769. 00 144, 875. 00 144, 875. 00 50, 000. 00 375. 00 15, 000. 00 900. 00 1, 500. 00 200. 00 300. 00 14, 673. 00 82, 948. 00 311, 592. 00 311, 592. 00 11, 597, 802. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 36, 370. 20 36, 370. 20 6, 572. 65 0. 00 0. 00 110. 70 30. 12 , 0. 00 6, 713. 47 68, 953. 02 68, 953. 02 13, 142. 70 44. 93 0. 00 110. 70 61. 54 0. 00 13, 359. 87 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 006. 37 37. 40 194. 58 101. 43 84. 31 0. 00 0. 00 1, 223. 00 7, 647. 09 14, 360. 56 14, 360. 56 880, 134. 98 t+ 6, 006. 37 47. 77 194. 50 189. 92 84. 31 0. 00 0. 00 2, 446. 00 8, 968. 95 22, 328. 82 22, 328. 82 1, 696, 748. 66 �y - ;T It ) ,ItlM ,, r, , Af;�l/A lt.x-. � tR; i u �i':•, "" �:i.' •f,�'+F. :'t a;• ..�n(�;ttT..;. 7. iyMi _".. •�{,;, �`ja�'vl��'''�+.,� v. f .s:� ;.,, ;��:�y'?'tj �}•.,P��''' �•. ,''1,y !Je q..�,..w .ti {��<� u. s,.�4, Y , •',.. .p r.. I. :�-'}�. .. ,. .�. 4H��. ,b �.�. I•.•+j31 r,�,�,y' .aF�7'� .'�., X31 � a. iwT"' a..) b •. �. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE :® 5, 417. 85 5, 417. 85 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 321, 270. 13 18. 7 321, 270. 13 18. 7 67, 423. 30 455. 07 1, 2.06. 00 1, 097. 30 61. 54- 287. 00 70, 409. 13 16. 3 8. 9 0. 0 9. 1 0. 0 0. 0 15. 9 t r 1$ m 0 O. 00 144, 875. 00 O. 0 O. 00 144, 875. 00 0. 0 0 0. 00 0. 00 285. 63 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 285. 63 2.85. 63 285. 63 41, 086. 94 43, 993. 63 327. 23 14, 519. 79 710. 08 1, 415. 69 200. 00 300. 00 12, 227. 00 73, 693. 42 12. 0 12. 7 3. 2 2.1. 1 5. 6 0. 0 O. 0 16. 6 11. 1 288, 977. 55 7. 2 288, 977. 55 7. 2 9, 859, 964. 40 14.9 0 C 0 0 6$ ,.: 444 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FIN, ICE-FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) TINE 17:24:%?4 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 i F VN?? DIV 013Jr DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 1279 IIUPGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 11 4200 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1279 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 22, 000. 00 1,833.33 3,666.66 OPJECT SUBTOTAL 22, 000. 00 1,833.33 3,666.66 1 DIVISION TOTAL 22, 000. 00 1,833.33 3,666.66 1 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 22, 000. 00 1,833.33 3,666.66 T 21-01 STREET LIGHTING DEPT: STREET LIGHTING 1.100 PERSONAL SERVICES 11 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/ MISC 96, 536. 00 8,007.14 15, 914. 52 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 500.00 20.82 20.82 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1,448.00 0. 00 0. 00 '1► 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1,448.00 477. 10 843. 50 4112 PART TIME/TEMPORARY 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 41130 RETIREMENT 13, 312.00 1,079.48 1,079.48 ?► 4185 SOCIAL_ SECURITY(F I C A) 0.00 57.36 114.44 41133 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 12, 024. 00 177. 16 1,680.32 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS 572.00 0.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 127, 840. 00 9, 819. 06 19, 653. 08 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 42:51 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1200 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4303 UTILITIES 4304 TELEPHONE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 431.6 TRAINING 4396 TRSFR OUT --INS USER CHCS ODJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL. DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 2, 000. 00 407. 00 2, 407. 00 172, 345. 00 301. 00 9, 975. 00 3, 780. 00 4, 200. 00 300. 00 11, 231. 00 202, 102. 00 :332, 349. 00 332, 349. 00 354, 349. 00 3. 00 0. 00 3. 00 11, 844. 36 2. 99 43. 23 50. 43 49. 75 0. 00 936. 00 12, q,26. 76 22, 748. 82 22, 748. 82 24, 582. 15 3. 00 0. 00 3. 00 11,844.36 2.99 63. 97 250.95 113.95 0.00 1,072.00 14, 148. 22 33, 804. 30 33, 804. 30 37, 470. 96 4-9 PAGE 0022 DATE 07./16/91 f.1) 16. 03 OF YEAR CO3ELETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE is 1.1.) 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 154. 80 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 154. 80 154. 80 154. 80 154. 80 18, 333.34 18, 333.34 18, 333. 34 16. 6 16. 6 16.6 18, 333.34 16.6 80, 621. 48 16. 4 479. 18 4. 1 1, 448. 00 0. 0 604. 50 56. 2 2, 000. 00 0. 0 12, 232. 52 8. 1 114. 44- 0. 0 10, 343. 68 13. 9 572. 00 0. 0 108, 186. 92 15. 3 1, 997.00 0. 1 407. 00 0. 0 2, 404. 00 0. 1 160, 500. 64 6. 8 298. 01 0. 9 9,756.23 2. 1 3, 499. 05 6. 6 4, 086. 05 2. 7 300. 00 0. 0 9, 359. 00 16. 6 187, 798. 98 7. 0 298, 389. 90 10. 2 298, 389. 90 10. 2 316, 723.24 10.6 •j 0 0 C?, • r: 9 1, 9 9 9 1 FINANCE-FA454 TIME 1'1.24:;14 F''JF17 DTV OBJT D:'ESCR 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST 1:I'7'? BUDGET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0023 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 03/16/91 16. 01 OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 1300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER .339 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT (OBJECT SUBTOTAL. DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3:101 VEI4 FKG DIST 15. 705. 00 15, 705. 00 15, 705. 00 15, 705. 00 DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MSC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 41130 RETIREMENT 4153 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4137 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUB;'TO'TAL. 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4396 TFSFR OUT -IDIS USER CMGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL '7400 EQUIPMENT 5420 DEPRECIATION -MCH EQUIP • OBJECT SUBTOTAL L 600 BUILDING S/IMPROVEMENTS 5620 DEPRECIATION/BLDG::>&IMPRV OBJECTSUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL_ DEPARTMENT TOTAL. 15, 711. 00 236. 00 236. 00 1, 827. 00 1, 300. 00 138. 00 19, 448. 00 75, 000. 00 75, 000. 00 175. 00 1, 000. 00 1, 000. 00 629.00 2, 804. 00 265. 00 265. 00 2, 145. 00 2, 145. 00 99, 662. 00 99, 662. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1, 308. 75 1, 308. 75 1, 308. 75 1, 308. 75 2, 617. 50 2, 617. 50 2, 617. 50 2, 617. 50 1,243.10 2,061.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 171.29 171.29 18. 29 203. 60 0.00 0.00 1,432.68 2,436.70 4, 353. 63 4, 870. 26 4, :353. 63 4, 870. 26 20. 57 20. 57 34. 73 57. 78 997. 41 997. 41 52. 00 104. 00 1, 1.04. 71 1, 179. 76 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 891. 02 8, 486. 72 6, 891. 02 8, 486. 72 e}i i3a :rT bio":•j.•,�}pi.,���`d'i1Y!"�••/ lit; i�?It..S tY'{+y lA $• •ed,!L`r;•.i �'L'� .F� 2fi:iµ ]tai' eM1 j' - Id. '�t!+t �i+.ix�� sF i?j.f..' - �'q„ :' aY::�`� r)d , •�'^ � , of >,., F '�" Mix .�?' ►ri . .t , ..a�K �. *'� „ 4.1 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE is 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 13, 087. 50 13, 087. 50 13, 087. 50 13, 087. 50 13, 649. 19 236, 00 236. 00 1, 655. 71 1, 096. 40 138. 00 17, 011. 30 70, 129. 74 70, 129. 74 154. 43 942. 22 2.59 525.00 1,624.24 16. 6 16. 6 16. 6 16. 6 13. 1 0. 0 O. 0 9. 3 15. 6 0. 0 12. 5 6. 4 6. 4 11. 7 5. 7 99. 7 16. 5 42. 0 265. 00 0. 0 0. 00 265. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2, 145. 00 2, 145. 00 • 0 Q Q 0 0 Q 4 0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 91, 175. 28 8. 5 0.00 91, 175.28 8. 5 F IrI r'cF- FA44 TIM'' 19 - 24: 7 4 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PACE O')24 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YE(47 C(Y i('L.ETE FUN) r)I V 013,!T DEiSCR APPROPRIATION 107 F'F:RL NC- FUND ..`_H FRO DIST DEPT: MSG FACILITIES 1 . O M(TED IALS/s! PPLIES/OTHER FUND TOTAL 115, 367. 00 '!1 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 8,199.77 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE is 11, 104. 22 0. 00 104, 262.78 9.6 • e 1 a e a FINANCE-_ -FA454 TIKE 19:24:24 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 00/01/91 TO 08/31/91 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR APPROPRIATION 110 PARKING FUND 129'? BUDGET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT "^r MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1.2..';'9 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 1, 319, 781. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 319, 781. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 1, 319. 781. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 319, 781. 00 3202 PARKING ENF DEPT: PKG FACILITIES 0.., PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4106 REGULAR OVERTIME 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4112 PART TII1E/TEMPORARY 4117 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL. 4.180 RETIREMENT 4135 SOCIAL. SECURITY(F I C A) 4137 UNIFORMS 4108 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4189 MEDICARE_ BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4303 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 1307 RADIO MAINTENANCE 4309 MAINTENANCE MATE=RIALS 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND L.UBE. 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAININGG 4317 CONFERENCE EXPENSE . 4396 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CMGS I")B•!ECT SUBT OTAL- 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 109, 995. 84 109, 995. 84 109, 995. 84 109, 995. 84 491, 694. 00 33. 571. 65 12, 000. 00 272. 04 7, 375. 00 0. 00 7, 375. 00 264. 76 44, 035. 00 11. 379. 34 5. 500. 00 275. 54 68, 528. 00 4, 714. 88 2, 240. 00 296. 94 1. 400. 00 42. 00 62. 520. 00 850. 73 2. 957. 00 695. 65 705,624.00 52, 363. 53 219, 991. 69 219.991.69 2.19, 991. 69 219, 991. 69 67. 300. 98 1. 053. 53 0. 00 989. 75 20. 239. 92 644. 97 4, 714. 88 456. 90 50. 99 8. 858.39 1. 175. 49 105, 490. 80 6, 300. 00 2,731.84 2, 876. 18 6, 300. 00 2,731.84 2,876.18 3, 500. 00 693. 2.4 817. 71 70, 000. 00 491. 19 6. 199. 28 4, 000. 00 628. 00 628. 00 12, 000. 00 13. 91 13. 91 7, 260. 00 534.95 1, 050. 18 12. 600. 00 ,433. 05 685. 91 500. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 48, 429. 00 4. 036. 00 8, 072. 00 160. 289. 00 6, 83C). 34 17, 466. 99 1. 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ry'., rir':'41.4 y. .4:;"; li 1k',. ,, :icl''', , 11('1F fv:reli.r A;f--.54 1r ',ft i4'1Mr?, p , itiVt CO PACE 0025 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% 13F l'EAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 1, 099, 789. 31 16. 6 0. 00 1, 099, 759.31 . 16.6 0. 00 1, 099. 789. 31 16. 6 0. 00 1, 099, 789. 31 16.6 0 .0 0 0 0 0.00 424, 393.02 13.6 0 0. 00 10, 946. 47 8.7 0. 00 7, 375. 00 0. 0 0. 00 6. 385. 25 13.4 0 0. 00 23, 795. 08 45. 9 0. 00 4, 850. 03 11. 8 0. 00 63, 813. 12 6. 8 0 0. 00 1, 783. 10 20. 3 0. 00 1,349.01 3. 6 0. 00 53, 661. 61 14.1 0. 00 1, 781. 51 39. 7 0. 00 600, 133. 20 14. 9 0 0. 00 3,423.82 45. 6 0. 00 3,423.82 45. 6 0.00 2,682.29 23.3 •,) 5. 700. 00 58, 100. 72 16. 9 0. 00 3, 372. 00 15. 7 0. 00 1 1 , 986. 09 0. 1 J 0. 00 6, 209. 82 14. 4 0. 00 11. 914. 09 5. 4 Q, 00 500. 00 0. 0 J 0: 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 1, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 40, 357. 00 16.6 0 5. 700. 00 137, 122. 01 14.4 0. 00 1, 700. 00 0. 0 'r •f' i4 0 limey"-a�JxN;, CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINA :CE-FA4:i4 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PACE Gi?^f: '' T!.MF Sr:24:24 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 07/16/91 16.0% OF Y..!? C C:• 1," L E TE FUM9 DIV OR.JT DFSCR 110 P^t'!-.Tr!^ FUND . i-.P.K IN. ENF APPROPRIATION DEPT: PKG FACILITIES : 700 Ei7UIPt1ENT 5403 VEHICLES 54;70 DEPRECIATION -MCH °: EQUIP MTh -CAPITALIZED ASSETS "DJECT SUBTOTAL. 0) L`L T'E PAYMENTS :930 LEASE PAYMENTS OP:JECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 50, 000. 00 25. 000. 00 10, 000. 00 86, 700. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 958, 913. 00 958, 913. 00 2. 278, 694. 00 rt' 61,925.71 61, 925. 71 171, 921. 55 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE r: 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 50, 000. 00 25, 000. 00 10, 000. 00 861700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 125, 833. 97 125, 833. 97 345, 825. 66 5, 700. 00 5, 700. 00 5, 700. 00 827, 379. 03 827, 379. 03 1, 927, 168. 34 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 13. 7 13. 7 15. 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A • INFN:E.•'FA1521 TIME 1^: 27:.24 FUN! DI:' ORJT D;=SCR 115 a 1'A 1 E GAS TAX FUND 121;0hET TRANSFER CITY OF HERMOSA DLACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (13Y FUND) PAGE 0027 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR CIJMFLETE APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP , YTD EXPND. DEPT: MOMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4 399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT T SUBTOTAL 1, 525, 346. 00 1, 525, 346. 00 126, 059. 22 264, 753. BO 126, 059. 22 264, 753. 80 DIVISION TOTAL 1, 525, 346. 00 126, 059. 22 264, 753. BO DEP ARTL•1:ENT TOTAL 1, 525, 346. 00 126, 059. 22 264, 753. 80 FUND TOTAL 1, 525, 346. 00 126, 059. 22,,r 264, 753. BO Sr 0 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC VALANCE ., 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 260, 592. 20 1, 2.60, 592. 20 1, 260, 592. 20 1, 260, 592. 20 1, 260, 592. 20 17. 3 17. 3 17. 3 17. 3 17. 3 :1 0 9'' t;S J[y• :V 4.., 3,: i? 'nvj 't"•' %i- N' `N' 'w i*• '"✓ry++` !y [. .CV7,�< .l. :f} ::w1'•.° i5 b. ,, # i�+y� i .i 5 y1p,,JCY, !Y[ i . ,gn : +¢ t 1; I :S1 T % y..+ : ,. �` • t.. ; ..0 ,F• S r. !.+".'��`:'' <;§ ,��t';'+f(.�•�;3t;,T1' x:�;.(1F�;�. �'. �,A,.r, .l. %'��k� v. � C��"r� r`• tii-,F.�y,'�!� �'}+.1; ��,. ,! .. <. L...«: ,� �- x •� v ,x � r b+• ... ,. .+c c .1"lT'+ '• • i �X'}'`�, •�Y.�1R.i'• -,'1r, .i,��. 'x,_��:}t,,)..• r ?f: �i i.�{+ +4 �����i4 i.,•.1,4:� �,t +�s�t'i`�'i' +'�'•;`lM`. .. f' If1.ANOE-VA134 '^, TING'1'7: 24: 24 1 q fb 4.5 FUN.) DIV OBJT i ::S:CR 12C' COUNTY GAS TAX FUND P(1I:GEr TRAW.7.FER • CITY OF HERMOSA PEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE FROM 08/01/91 TO 09/31/91 DATE 09/It/?1 P' 16.0% or YEAR CO Ir (.ETF_ APPROPRIATION DEFT: MOOT/SUPPORT .'OO NATrf'IALS,'GUPPLIES/OTHER ?3 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT (Jr JECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 34, 841. 00 34, 841. 00 34, 841. 00 34, 841. 00 34, 841. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 2,903.42 2,903.42 2.903.42 2,903.42 2,903.42 5, 806. 84 5, 806. 84 5, 806. 84 5, 806. 84 5, 806. 84 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 29, 034. 16 29, 034. 16 29, 034. 16 29, 034. 16 29, 034. 16 16. 6 16. 6 16. 6 16. 6 16. 6 ert • FINANCE-i'A=! TINE 1. :•).:.::) •� FUND DIV 0E3T DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE MEN., BALANCE "/, pj 125 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES 9 17(;'? n1.! F.INc?NC:E-Ft•r !4 T I M F 15': 2,1: :_'.4 ^+ FUN!? nt',' r L-t_5CR 1.26 UUT RAILROAD RICHT OF WAY FUND R► CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (DY FUND) PACE CO30 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: PARKS -i: 00 CONTRACT SERVICES =J1 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL x.'00 LEASE PAYMENTS PAYMENTS U ..:ECT-`:UT,TO fAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL_ 40, 085. 00 40, 085. 00 618, 813. 00 618, 813. 00 658, 898. 00 658, 899. 00 658, 898. 00 • MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC, BALANCE 0) 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40, 005. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40, 005. 00 0. 0 446, 710. 00 446, 710. 00 446, 710. 00 446, 710. 00 446, 710. 00 L 446, 710. 00 446, 710. 00 446, 710. 00 446, 710. 00 446, 710. 00 • 0. 00 172, 103. 00 72. 1 0. 00 172, 103. 00 72. 1 0. 00 212, 108. 00 67. 7 0. 00 212, 189. 00 67. 7 0. 00 212, 198. 00 67. 7 /) .$) of s'1 elk O. FIN..i!C:E•-F4.15:1. TIPti 1'' 24:21 CITY OF HERMOSA—BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0031 FROM 08/01/91 TO 013/31/91 DATE 09/1/,/91 16. C0 OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND I't.. 1;.,.)T I)14! CR APPROPRIATION 1 ':7 6': UTILITY u`3ER TAX FUND 12'79 BULXET TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIA!._S/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL_ DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 0 A .0 �` '�ka17.i*U';'u ='�:�t;r't�R'.�,� ;)y�Y;y�v R�µtr �;trir v'�'p• ,-'Ftf`��l' � ,., 1�� � •l05;, r� vy�t�.rN� f.. .i. s. 1, 050, 000. 00 1, 050, 000. 00 1, 050, 000. 00 1, 050, 000. 00 1, 050, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 67, 500. 00 175, 000. 00 87, 500. 00 175, 000. 00 87, 500. 00 175, 000. 00 87, 500. 00 175, 000. 00 87, 500. 00 r 175, 000. 00 tO" 4t { t s '' '�'.. la d 4 y. 4 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 875, 000. 00 875, 000. 00 875, coo. 00 875, 000. 00 875, 000. 00 },'. r 16. 6 16. 6 16. 6 16. 6 16 6 Qi ®' 0 0 0 0 0 0 413 F I IO 7C:E-FA454 TIMFi 1'P 2,1 • 3'} FUN'' DIV OL3JT DESCR 140 COIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR .1"C" mt„M:= IN6 REHAB CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 00/31/91 APPROPRIATION DEPT: OTHER. -1:7:00 :CP•:TM1CT =VICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUB IDrr'-!.. DIVISION TOTAL .i02 CDL'i:. ADMIN DEPT: OTHER 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPAPTM'i:NT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 PAGE D(,TE 09 / V.;/91 .91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNEr.v BALANCE: 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.0 0. 00 0. 0 0.00 0.0 0. 00 0. 0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0. 00 0. 0 e • QS 9 • P18010E F -'A1 1 TIMI'- 17:24:24 FUND DIV OBJT DESCR 145 PROF0SIT1011 'A FUND CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0033 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DAT. 07/1,,/91 16.05 OF 'i C:F•.o c0NF E TE APPROPRIATION 124? 01000'T TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 0.00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0.00 :.1101 0141. A RIDE DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 41 '.DC, PERSONAL 2EPV I 69 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4130 RETIREMENT 41131) EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS n13•.!ECT SUBTOTAL_ .200 CIT•IT'?4.0 r SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT .SERVIC'-/PPIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 47.00 MATFP'IA!._S/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 431)15 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 6 IPSFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 21'JECT SUI;TOiF4_ 18, 620. 00 853. 00 1, 462. 00 219. 00 21. 174. 00 158, 755. 00 158, 755. 00 50. 00 500. 00 125. 00 675. 00 DIVISION TOTAL ((10.604. 00 7.11. COMMUTER BUS DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 11.00 PE:R?_ONAL 2F0VICES 4102 REGULAR 0:'.L HR =(1150 4180 PETIREMcNI 4100 EMPLOYEE BEENEFI I S 4129 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1`700 CONTRACT SERVICES .2::1 :11t1TRAC? 55339100/00IVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2. 451. 00 290. 00 280. 00 15. 00 3, 036. 00 20, 000. 00 20, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXE' YTD EXPND. 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1,421.13 199. 97 25. 66 0.00 1,646.76 0. 00 0. 00 8. 32 0. 00 10.00 18. 32 1, 665. 08 222. 24 70. 90 7. 63 0. 00 •700. 77 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2,493.05 199. 97 154. 41 0. 00 2,847.43 O. 00 0. 00 8.32 O. 00 20.00 20. 32 0' 0 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE is 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 875. 75 0. 00 439 54 70. 90 51. 17 0. 00 561. 61 4, 791.50 4, 791. 50 0, 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 16, 126. 95 653. 03 1, 327. 59 219. GO 18, 326. 57 158, 755. 00 158, 755. 00 41.68 500. 00 105. 00 646. 68 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 n 13. 3 23. 4 10. 4 0. 0 13. 4 0. 0 0. 0 16.6 0. 0 16. 0 4. 1 177, 723.25 1.5 2, 011. 46 219. 10 226. 83 15.00 2, 474. 39 15, 208. 50 15, 208. 50 17. 9 24.4 18. 2 0.0 10.4 23. 9 23. 9 0 • 0 7 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY RKPORr (BY FUND) C7,24 '11 11M0 t7 71.,74 FROM 08/01/91 TO 00/31/91 DATE 07/14/91 16.0% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUN!) Ply (MUT DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMEFoNcE rAtJvcE 7. rrornsiTioN 'A FUND 00!1M01' 9US DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4200 MATERIA1_S/S0PFLTE9/OTMER 4276 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHG13 1. 00 1. 00 2. 00 0. 00 1.00- 200.0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1.00 1. 00 2. 00 0. 00 1 00-' 200.0 DivISION TOTAL 23,037.00 301.-77 5,355.11 0.00 17,661.69 3403 ElY7 SUBSDY DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT TN, 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1102 RE0ULAR SALARIES/MISC 1,619.00 137. 40:t 274. 80 0. 00 1• 3'4. 20 16. 6 41E0 RET I REMENT 227, 00 18. 93 18, 93 0. 00 700. 07 0. 2 111313 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 294. 00 2. 70 31. 61 0. 00 242.37 10. 7 .1.190 MEDICARE BENEFITS 24. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 24. 00 0,)) 01.1.:F2T S,...,11TOT6!... 2, 194. 00 159. 11 325. 34 0. 00 1,86E166 14.8 4200 CONTRACT SERVIC06 47'51 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 14,332.00 643.00 643.00 0.00 17,429.00 4.4 11. OBJECT SUBTOTAL. 14, 332. 00 643. 00 643. 00 0. 00 17..,,07. CC, 4. 4 .,,':•''M MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 41,6 1.1176 TP.SFR OUT -INS USER CHCS 745.00 62.00 124.00 0.00 621.00 16.6 1 9,..m.014o._ 745.00 62.00 12.1..00 0.00 621.00 16.6 410 DIVISION TOTAL 17,271.00 864. 11 1, 092. 34 O. 00 1/.), 10.64. 6. 3 1-1013 FUND EXCHANGE DEPT: PUBLIC TPANIT 1(.30 CLN10ACT .16 CLINTR0CT 1:E7710E/CO0T 110, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 110, 000. 00 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOIAL 110, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 110, 000. 00 0.0 00 DIVISION TOTAL. 110,000. k.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 114,000.00 0.0 Illo .M00 ,-:000T00 xrpEss DEPT: PUBLIC TRANSIT 4100 F0:.97ONAL ':Dr,,ICES 11.1b 4102 REGULAR SALARIEWMISC 1,035.00 92.16 184.32 0.00 850.66 17.6 4190 RETIREMENT 143.00 16.16 16.16 0. 00 126.94 11.3 4108 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 12:..,. 00 2.11 8.34 0.00 117. L6 6.6 % OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 304 00 110. 43 208.82 0. 00 1, 707. 1S 16.0 120 dry, 0.5 dr, 4.5 Ai" 0 0 0 0 0 9 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INCE-FA,154 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PACE • 0035 TUT: 19. 24: 24 POM 08/01/91 TO 08/21/91 /11-./91 1. • 1.15 FT,'•Oi. 3105 COMMUTER XPRESS APPROPR IAT ION IA: : I"U:(31. IC TP.ANS IT .47'00 C(3NTRACT SERVICES .2:51 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT fl TaTAL 9, 000. 00 9, 000. 00 DIVISION 10142 10, 304. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL !MO TOTAL 341, 216. 00 MON r 1- YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANI;C: 0. .00 0. 00 110. 43 72. 941. 39 27. 941.21 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 208. 82 9, 532. 02 9, 532. 02 0. 00 0. 00 9, 000. 00 9, 000. 00 • 10, 095. 10 331, 683. 95 0 2. 0 27 '.1.; • jftriZt... ,041,1,1:"...`.41';':fitille..-"voii=4,,,, Pro' I •, ' .e.$1` •.at ' 'A.. •••••• 4. • t.'• „V t , . , ,) • P oils, ,1 t 4±, , • 71. 401.- 0 0 ..et 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIME 19:24:24 DIV OBJT DESCH CliY MT:!?M0:7;A TWkCH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY miruilir T.1 FUND) PA.(1E FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/1/91 1A. 0% OF YEAH COMPLETE AFFUMH1ATInN • DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT '1 1200 11ATERIALS/S0PFL/11THE 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 0f JECT 508 TOTAL rf.17! TOTAL DEPAR TMEN f FUND TOTAL 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 '11 0, 00Q. 40, 00 40, 000. 00 40, 000. 00 .aj, 00.). mnNTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 3, 333. 33 :77171 33 3, 333. 3, 333. 33 3,333.33 1 6,666.66 6,666.66 6, 666. C.,6, 6,666.66 t' ENCUMBH(,.M.2E 0. 00 0. 00 33, 333. 34 33, 333. 34 0. 00 16. 6 16. 6 16. 6 ".. nr HERMOSA BEACH EXPLNOIlzJi:k 10 'ORT (DY FUND) 4. 24 1U 08/31/91 FIND DIV OBJT DESCR TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT /SUPPrif,T "300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 43q4 OPERATING TRAM7FS ;JUl OBECI MONTHLY EXP YTD EYPM CUNPLETE F!!, UNErs/C BALANCE 7. 1. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0. 00 O. 00 1. 00 !2141SION TOTAL 1.00 DEPARmEar TOTAL 2102 CWDSSING GLM.RD 1)31' : POLICE SALARIES/NISC 110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4113 CROSSING GUARDS 41130 RETIREMENT 41135 SOC: IAL'2:- 41 r UNTFOPM', q11':3 OLNEFITS NaDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1700 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT f':ERVP;;-::./FqIVATv, 42i1 0O0FP:',C1 '-EFV,CF/WVT SUT.110[(4. MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4306 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CMGS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVIS10;-: ;OVAL CRARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 12, 012, 00 180 00 11-..;: 31 ? Or; 1., .311. 00 2, 121. 00 300. 00 1, 200. 00 437. 00 51, 91i6 2, 000. 00 600. 00 2, 600. 00 ,e.;6!;', 11) 57, 221. 00 57, 221. 01) O. 0. 00 0. 00 1 0" 0.0 0.0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.0 3:3,1.1-10 0 00 0. 00 0. 00 128. 78 0. 00 0. 00 13. (13 0. C10 0/6. 61 0. 00 10, 143. 39 ..:0 ..• 0. 00 0. 00 1•70 .'1, 0 ," 0.00 0.00 11-4 i0 13.0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 0 128. 78 9 04 i., 1138. 22 9. 7 is .3::; .. 2, 121. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 300. 00 0 0 16.1 26., 0. 00 1, 038. 74 13. 1 0. 00 0. 00 437. 00 O. 0 2. 158. 65 0. 00 40. 7'7. .30 r. 1 6. 00 6. 00 0. 00 1, 994. 00 0. 3 0. 00 0 00 0. 00 600. 00 0. 0 6. 00 ,. 00 0. 00 2, 594. 00 0.2 ',222. 00 222. 00 1, 304. 61 1, 304. 61 444. 00 0. 00 3;`1 16. e, 444. 00 0. 10 16. 6 2, 60E. 65 2, 608. 65 2, 608. 65 0. 00 54, 612. 35 4. 5 0.00 54, 612. 75 0. 00 e•10 :•:' • 4. 5 0 0 0 •0 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 0 i• ;1,4'0 •-/ • - • •-1,, • • 4. •tt.• r, - • "r•r.:4* 6.-4‘f.,!111.. /tr.14•44V,10 ',!:k...;)'1'e•a • )/ ,0,,.4t44•1',N.440 , ,••••• , :•,•• • s t -f; Ai I $ 7 CITY 01- NERM ;til ii!-rr^.FS EXPENDITURE SUMMARY I'F_0UP-1 (EY FUND) 00911 08/01,1.'1 10 08/31/91 FUND 1)I'. 0139T DESCR AI'F'iRUi=RIATION 160 `_F0r. •' " UN" TRANSFER DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4300 MATER IALS/ SUPPLIES/OTHER 4399 OPERATING TRANSFERS 007 1, ^Fc, 4213. 00 c)BJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 288, 428. 00 _.!';'18101 TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3102 SEWER/ST DRAIN 1, 288, 423. 00 1, 298, 158. 00 1,' FT: ST/ HWY/ST. DRAIN MUNTHLY EXP YTD EXPND 110, 158. 89 110, 158. 89 110, 1L.3...., 110, 158. 89 186, 339. 14 186, 839. 14 1816, 1(39. 14 186, 839. 14 4102 ft1_I:;Iir_AR SALAR IES/MISC 96, 321. 00 7, 529. 25 14, 940. 06 1106 I7000LAR OVERTIME 1, 500. 00 223. 44 547. 44 4110 VACAT ION/SICK PAY OFF 1.445 CO 0.00 0.00 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 1, 445. 00 221. 40 221. 40 4 180 RETIREMENT 1:11, 203 00 1, 083. 25 1, 083. 25 4185 EDC IAT_ .SEC(PRI T',•'F 1 A] 0.00 25. 51 51.70 4128 E(IPLUrF!= OENFFITS 11, 304. 00 146. 73 1, 464. 68 '= 1'39 9913 ICA:! O !JEI•!EFITS 492. 00 0. 00 0. 00 U'_ .:c_:: r SUL''TOTA!_ 125, 790. 00 9, 22'",,. ::113 1(3, 309. 03 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES • 1.501 CONTRACT SERVICE/i'IRIVA[11 2, 10... 0.0 0.00 0. 00 0.00 . , 100, 00 0.0 ;21. CONTRACT SE:RVIC1/rr-1•,rl 3,253.00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 3,255.00 0.0 ^OBJECT S,.'!'•i 15'A _ 5,355.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.355. 00 0.0 5) i•1.:1' 0Ip,!_:.' /5:lPPLIE33/OTHER 47. UIILITI!.::S 500.00 3!::...1r3 35.48 0.00 464.52 7 0 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 11.000 (]c.) 1,056.69 1.056.69 113. 89 9,859.42 10.6 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 1, 1.0:). (39 87.27 191.39 0.00 90E3 6] 17.3 e- 4311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4.000.00 79.00 381.58 0.00 3,618,42 9.5 4376 TRSFR OUT -1N8 116ER LHON; 29. 654. 00 2,471. 00 4.942.00 0. 00 24, 712. 00 16.6 OBJECT T .SL1B ! O T AI- 46,254.003.729.44 39.5 6, 60:'. 14 113.89 32.q 7 14.5 !i DIVISION TOTAL 177, 399.00 1!-:959. (`L'. 24, 916. 17 113. 89 152, 368. 9' 11.. I 0 FACT :0 if'1..= TE UI'IENC BALANCE is 0. 00 1, 101, !383. 86 14. 5 0. 00 1, 101, 583. 86 14. 5 0. 00 1, 101, 5E3E3. 86 1. 0.00 1, 391.,'. 14 3 fy 0, OP 0. 00 81, 380. 44 15.5 0. 00 952. 56 36. a 0. 00 1, 415 00 0. c_• 0.00 1: 15.3 i 0 co:!:.,,1t:,,,,..,8. 1 0.6.3- 51.70— 0. 0 0. 00 9, 039. 32 12.9 in 0. 00 492. 00 0. 0 0. 00 107, 480. 97 1.4. DEPARTMENT TOTAL 177, :399. 0(1 12, 959. 02 24, 916. 17 113. 89 152, 368. 94 14. 1 F'JND 10109 1, 465, 827. 00 123, 117. 91 211, 755. 31. 113 89 1, 253, 957. 80 14. 4 00, 0 0 0 0 0 FIT4ANCE-FA154 T THE 24: 24 FUND PTV 01 -:JT PLSCR Y FEIZURE/FORFEITURE FUND 1299 PU0GET TRANSFER DEPT: 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIE/OTHER 1299 OPERATIN0 1RANSERS OUT SUBTO4AL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2103 '..FEC 1NVES1G TNS DEPT: .1100 PLR8ONAL SERVICES 4108 REGULAR SALARIES/SAFETY 1105 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 4107 PREMIUM OVERTIME 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4190 RE1IREmEN1 4107 UNiF0!::M.:. 41A:8 ENi-LOYEE liENEFI TS 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4001 CUNIRI,CT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJCT SuBIOIAL 4200 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4304 TELEPHONE 4310 MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 4:311 AUTO MAINTENANCE 4316 TRAINING 4322 UNCLASSIFIED 4996 TRSFR OUT -INS USER CHGS • OBJECT SUBTOTAL 5400 EQUIPMENT 5401 EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $500 5402 EQUIPMENT -MORE THAN $500 5403 VEHICLES OBJECT SUBTOTAL 6700 IN rEREs r 67oo INTEREST CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 00/31/91 APPROPRIATION 11(21 r/13uF00',1- 37, 000. 00 37, 000. 00 37, 000. 00 37, 000. 00 POLICE 172, 104. 00 10, 560. 00 33, 000. 00 4, 000. 00 50, 991. 00 2, 600. 00 12, 000. 00 1, 260. 00 291, 715. 00 5, 000. 00 5, 000. 00 • 8, 443. 00 0, 000, (>0 0 00 500. 00 5, 000. 00 16, 270. 00 35, 218. 00 , 2, 500. 00 8, 099. 00 22, 050. 00 32, 649. 00 0. 00 MONTHLY EXP Y TB EXPN1). 3, 083. 33 3, 083. 33 3, 083. 33 3, 083. 33 11, 634. 00 660. 00 2, 657. 83 2, 722. 00 3, 480. 73 175. 02 87. 42 0.00 21, 417. 00 177.90 197.90 0. 00 859. 52 1323. 16 1321. 50 40, 000. 00- 1, 356. 00 36, 139. 82- , •• 0. 00 5, 108. 33 0. 00 5, 108. 33 2, 400. 00 6,166.66 6,166.66 6,166.66 6,166.66 23, 268. 00 1, 320. 00 6, 195. 58 2, 722. 00 3, 480. 73 2;i0. 04 1, 956. 57 0. 00 39, 292. 92 357. 29 :357. 09 733. 93 859. 52 1323. 16 1321. 50 0. 00 2, 712. 00 5, 950. 11 0. 00 5, 108. 33 0. 00 5, 10E3. :33 2, 400. 00 OA I 09/16/91 16. 0% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0, 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.0(1 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 30, 633. 34 30, 833. 34 30, 30, 883. 34 148, 836. 00 9, 240. 00 31, 304. 42 1, 278. 00 47, 510. 27 2, 449. 96 10, 043. 43 1, 260. 00 252, 472. 0>3 4, 642. 71 4, 642. 71 7, 714. 07 4, 140. 47. E%33. 16- .321, 50- 5, 000.:00 13, 558. 00 29, 267. 89 2, 500. 00 2, 990. 67 22, 050. 00 27, 540. 67 2, 400. 00- 16. 6 16. 6 16. 6 16. 6 13. 5 12. 5 16. 3 68. 0 6. 12. 5 16. 3 0.0 13. 4 7. 1 7. 1 8. 6 17. 1 0. 0 164. 3 0. 0 16. 6 16. 8 0. 0 63. 0 0. 0 15. 6 0.0 141133Vi5v.%;4'.."4% ot #‘ aritai/V4 "'-A141'.',,1•9'''Is A )01.04h. 4 , • • I :1 • .41 r, • 4 4, 0 0 '0 0 0 F I td: NC F --F A4 .14 TIME )9: 24: ^4 FUND DIV ODJT DESCR 17'2, EE rR^TECTION FUND 2103 SPEC INVESTG T NC DEPT: POLICE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0040 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91. DATE 09/1h/91 16.0% Oi ,PAR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION 1=2:$O C'2,N1MACT SERVICES OL3 JECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL Ck'_P.AFn MEN r TOTAL FUND TOTAL r 0.00 364, 582. 00 364, 382. 00 401, 382. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 2, 400. 00 7, 016. 39- 7, 016. 39- 3, 933. 26- 2, 400. 00 53, 108. 65 53, 108. 65 59, 275. 31 61 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC E ,L:1CF *1 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2, 400. 00— 0. 0 311, 473.35 311,473.35 342, 306. 69 14. 5 14. 5 14.7 • 0 9 O FINANCE--FA-1:)4 T IN- 17: 74: ;24- FUN') 4 F-UN') 01V RFSCR I. Jr, !:! F-'RC+TEC [ION FUND 2202 HYDRANT UPGRADE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PA: -E 0041 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE CV/16/91 16.0% OF YEAR AR COMPLETE APPROPRIATION DEPT: FIRE 1200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PR IVATE_ OBJECT SLAB TOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL 100, 000. 00 100, 000. 00 100, 000. 00 100, 000. 00 100, 000. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00..t 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 at t; 16' ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE Q 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 100, 000. 00 100, 000. 00 100, 000. 00 100, 000. 00 100, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 C� Qg 0 0 0 es si1411. gent. :fi,... i+°,{yfi 44� r+�!9,t1ti4 C �' .51yX4�� +- ..t;�.w„ •t' err+• � .t1:.A. �iA n • ."f t... +f •r:i�:'• M +:sir, �'�..4• FUMI) DIV OBJT DESCR 305 CP ITAI_ IMPRO'iEMENT FUND ;713' CTP S5--137 CITY OF HERMOSA PEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FADE 0342 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 07/16/71 16. 0% OF YFAi? r:OVPLF:TE APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET/SAFETY L'OO CONTRACT SERVICES 4.7:O1 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRTVATF_ 70.. CT SUBTOTAL DIVISI0.I TOTAL 566, 420. 00 566, 420. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UrJEF4: B/-L,-NcE �1 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 566, 420. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 566, 420. 00 • 0. 0 566, 420. 00 0. 00 C1P '3°-141 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 1200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE iJ13.JECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 224, 211. 00 224, 211. 00 0. 00 0. 00 224, 21 1. 00 0. 00 6142 CI!' 39-142 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICE=S 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL TITVISION TOTAL 35, 000. 00 35, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 35, 000. 00 0. 00 91114 C1P 9`7!"-144 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY • 4100 PFRSnrV L_ SERVICES 4112 RAPT TIME/TEMPORARY 4157 SOCIAL SECURITY(F I C A) 4199 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION 13116 CIE 89-146 TOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 845, 011. 00 845, 011. 00 1,037.93 15. 05 64. 35 1, 117. 33 0. 00 0.00 845, 011. 00 1,117.33 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 1200 CONTRACT SERVICES •7201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE t 5, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 566, 420. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 224, 211. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 224, 211. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 224, 211. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 2,204.36 31. 96 136. 67 2,372.99 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. CO 0. 00 0.00 0.00 2, 372. 99 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 35, 000. 00 35, 000. 00 0.0 0.0 35, 000. 00 0. 0 2,204.36- 31.96- 136.67- 2,372.99- 645, ,204.36- 31.96- 136.67- 2,372.99- 645, 011. 00 845, 011. 00 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 842, 638. 01 0.2 5, 000. 00 0. 0 #1 +'1 a'a ett 011 • II4,,,NC:E--FA154 T !ME 17: 2.1: 24 FUND DIV 713JT Di::SCR CITY OF HERMOSA REACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (Sy FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 APPROPR TA'TION MONTHLY EXP YTP.. EXFND. PA ;E 0':43 DATE OP/16/71 16. 0%. TIP YEAR. COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE U1.E!JC D.,:.L NCE 305 C:'.i= I r 1L_ IMPROVEMENT FUND 200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1,27 'F 1T SUPTOTN_ 5, 000. 00 0. 00 O. 00 0. 00 5, 000. 00 O. 4. DIVISION TOTAL 5, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5, 000. 00 0. 0 0.1.`}0 CIF 89-150 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 200 CONTRACT SERVICES •42+01 CONTRACT .SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL.. 20, 000. 00 20, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 20, 000. 00 8151 CIP 99--151 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 000. 00 0 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 20, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 'T 0. 00 0. 00 20, 000. 00 0. 0 4140 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201. CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 40, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 0 a. OP‘JECT S(1P.TMTN_ 40, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 0 e DIVISION TOTAL_ 40, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 40, 000. 00 0. 0 8165 CIF 87-165 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 120.0 CONTRACT SERVICES 1-7.'01 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 17, 545. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 545. 00 0. 0 ,� OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 545. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 545. 00 0. 0 8T'JTSION TOTAL. 17, 545. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 545. 00 0. 0 8170 cir 87-170 DEPT: STREET/SAFETY 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1301 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL 228, 978. 00 228, 978. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 228, 978. 00 0. 0 ,, 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 228,5'78.00 O. 0 0. 00 0. 00 228, 978. 00 0. 00 1, 982, 165. 00 1, 117. 33 1, 141. 90 1, 141. 90 1, 141. 90 3, 514. 89 1,685.45 1,685.45 1,685.45 1,685.45 • O 2, 827. 35- 0. 0 2, 027. 35- 0. 0 226, 150. 65 1. 2 1, 976, 964. 66 0. 2 �.1 Il CITY OF HERMOSA I3EACH FINAI.ICE--FA434 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PACE 0.:44 TIME 19:2.:;.'4 FROM 08/01/91 TO 00/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16. C.% OF YEAR COMPLETE FUND DIV OT'.!T D9CR 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 6701 CI!' H5 -6Q1 APPROPRIATION DEPT: STREET LIGHTING MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1) 0f:' CONIPACF SERVICES 1201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 22, 000.00 0.00 0.00 ,.. S.!ECT SUBTOTAL 22, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 22, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 DEPARTMENT TOTAL 22, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1 010,', CIE' 98-406 DEPT: SANITARY SEWER :O CONTRACT SERVICES .'-101 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 1, 138, 428. 00 359, 406. 28 358, 406. 28 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1, 138, 428. 00 356, 406. 28 358, 406. 28 DIVISION TOTAL 1, 139, 428. 00 359, 406.28 358, 406.28 11) DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1, 138, 428. 00 358, 406. 28 358, 406. 28 6506 CIF' 66-506 DEPT: PARKS ii • 200 CONTRACT SERVICES . 4221 CAii'JTRACT ECRVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 1300 MATL-R IALS/SUP^LIES/BYRE!' 4309 I1AINTEN",N•CE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL :;400 E'111PMENr 5401 EQUIPMENT --LESS THAN $500 U BJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 8509 CIP 07-508 20, 000. 00 20, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 120. 49 120. 49 0. 00 120. 49 120. 49 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20, 000. 00 120. 49 DEPT: PARKS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 1201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE L'3JECT SUBTOTAL 66, 000. 00 66, 000. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1, 366. 00 1, 366. 00 2, 093. 99 2, 093. 99 1, 375. 35 1, 375.:35 120. 49 4,835.34 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 22, 000. 00 0. 0 22, 000. 00 . 0. 0 22, 000. 00 0. 0 22, 000. 00 0. 0 780, 021. 72 780, 021.72 31. 4 31. 4 7$30,021.72 31.4 780, 021. 72 31. 4 18, 634. 00 18, 634. 00 2, 214. 48- 2,214.49- 1, 375. 35- 1, 375. 35- 1' f f. f: f. 6.8 6.8 0.0 O. 0 0. 0 0.0 15,044. 17 24.7 66, 000. 00 66, 000. 00 0.0 0.0 Pp a,A at �1 f) '0) ;!1 0 4 9 9 1, • Fri l''+'10E FA..934 TIME 17: '4:.24 CITY•OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 FUND. DIV OBJT DFSCR APPROPRIATION 305 CAPITAL .1 IP iUVEMENT FUND DIVISION TOTAL MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 66, 000. 00 0. 00 0531 C I n c,(..._`;1 1 DEPT: PARKS 420,0 CONTRACT SERVIC'wS 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 1.11, 500. 00 111, 500. 00 ®' PAGE 0045 DATE 09/16/71 16. Ci:- OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 00 0. 00 0. 00 66, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 111, 500. 00 0. 0 Q3_ 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 111, 500. 00 0. 0 111, 500. 00 0. 00 8110 CIP 39--513 DEPT: PARKS -200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL 50, 000. 00 50, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 111, 500. 00 0. 0 9) 9) 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 50, 000. 00 0. 0 01 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 50, 000. 00 0. 0 50, 000. 00 0. 00 8515 CIP 39--515 DEPT: PARKS .9. 00 0. 00 50, 000. 00 0. 0 Q' 0 5500 LAPD) 5501 LAND 0. 00 200, 000. 00 200, 000. 00 0. 00 200, 000. 00- 0. 0 OBJECT SUBTOTAL- 0. 00 200, 000. 00 200, 000. 00 0. 00 200, ('OO. 00- 0. 0 DIVISION Turco.. DEPARTMENT TOTAL 8601 CIP S6-601 0. 00 247, 500. 00 DEPT: BLOCS I, GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 2, 000. 00 2, 000. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 2, 000. 00 0604 CIE' 86-604 DEPT: BLOCS & GROUNDS .2-.10 CONTRACT SE?V10E S 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PR.IVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 17, 333. 00 17, 533. 00 f�,'wert,00 f ; 0.,f,,l,qt, , ij�l . -104„+r - t 1 ,.5'�4,, ,p oto' • }"'+? N i a.• •4+, ,, i,f .�' h. Y..Y ('.i r . '' J: :r tt, !'71 1.., ,h :•. - ,r'r 200, 000. 00 200, 000. 00 200, 120. 49 200, 120. 49 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0 0. 00 200, 000. 00- 0. 0 4, 635. 34 42, 544. 17 82. S 0 0. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 2, 000. 00 0. 0 0. 00 2, coo. co o. o 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 533. 00 0. 0 17, 533. 00 0. 0 0 434•P• 'sf;tiri FINANCE-FA454 TIME 1?' 2 : 24 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) FACE 0046 FROM OS/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.0. OF YEAR COMPLETE ', Tt!ui? 0I'J 011..17 DESCR APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. ENCUMBRANCE UNEOC BP.LAN"E 305 CAPITAL I(1PROVEMENT FUND DIVISION TOTAL 17, 533.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T CIP R7-606 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4709 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0.00 0.00 DIVISION TOTAL- 0.00 12'C.0 0 S9-600 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 116.49 116. 49 116. 49 ;_ •. CONTRACT SERVICES 7 1201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 21,000.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 21, 000. 00 0. 00 119 • cif DIVISION TOTAL 21, 000.00 0.00 CTP 37..609 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 1200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 30, 000. 00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 30, 000. 00 DIVISION TO TAL 30, 000.00 9615 CI0 P,9-615 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 116.49 0.00 116. 49 0. 00 116. 49 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 100 CONTRACT SERVICES 4701 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 1300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4309 M,'.INTENANCE MATERIALS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION 8616 CTP 90-616 1 0 TAI_ 374. 00 :374. 00 146. 62 146.62 374. 00 146. 62 DEPT: BLDGS & GROUNDS 4200 CONTRACT S_RVICES 4201 C(?NTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 45, 000. 00 0. 00 270. 40 270. 40 0. 00 0. 00 270. 40 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 a.� 7. L. 17, 533. 00 0. 0 116. 49- 116. 49- 116. 49- 21, 000. 00 21, 000. 00 21, 000. 00 30, 000. 00 30, 000. 00 30, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 103. 60 103. 60 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 72. 2 72. 2 103.60 72.2 45, 000. 00 0. 0 0 ♦_ CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE FA45l EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) PAGE 0047 /'!I TIME 19:24:24 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16/91 16.0: OF YEAR COMPLETE 41) FUND DIV 0t ..!T DESCR 305 CAPITAL IMPROVE;'1ENT FUND 1200 CONTR AC r SERVICES T SUBTOTAL APPROPRIATION MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 45, 000. 00 O. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 45, 000. 00 O. 00 '''. DEPARTMENT TOTAL 115, 907. 00 263. 11 8/01 CIP 39-701 DEPT. OTHER PROJECTS ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE is 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 386. 89 0. 00 0. 00 4 000. 00 45, 000. 00 115, 520. 11 0. 0 0. 0 0. 3 0 0 0 „1 1200 CONTRACT SERVICES C 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE_/PRIVATE 15, 000. 00 O. 00 11 OBJECT SUBTOTAL 15, 000. 00 O. OOf DIVISION TOTAL DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL. 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 3, 521, 000. 00 0. 00 0. 00 559, 907. 21 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 562, 428. 55 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6, 520. 79 15, 000. 00 15, 000. 00 15. 000. 00 • 15, 000. 00 2, 952, 050. 66 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 16. 1 1/45 a 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 .. � '� 1 �' v rte?i�; _ i•'+ ^,i. hr; i�t�". L .' "" �t.'� .0 FNr?r10E Frig ;34 T I t1'-: 19: 21: 24 CITY OF HERMOSA LEACH EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (SY FUND) PAGE O010 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 DATE 09/16.91 16.0% OF YEAR CO' PL.ETE FUND DIS.' f 11.JT D!=SCR APPROPRIATION 705 INS'.JRANoE F!.!ND 1709 LI.:;BI TTY INS DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 1100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 4110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 1.111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4130 RETIREMENT 4120 E4PLO',EE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL +200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE OBJECT SUB 1 O 1 t1L 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 1375 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4315 MEMBERSHIP 4316 TRAINING 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 24, 305. 00 365. 00 365. 00 3, 352. 00 3, 972. 00 32, 359. 00 370, 630. 00 370, 630. 00 300. 00 1, 050. 00 250. 00 70, 000. 00 71, 600. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 474, 589. 00 1210 AUTO/PROP/BONDS DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE_/PRIVATE OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUP'r'LIES/OTHER 4324 CLAIMS/SETTLEMENT'S OBJECT SUBTOTAL 37, 000. 00 37, 000. 00 10, 500. 00 10, 500. 00 DIVISION TOTAL 47, 500. 00 1213 UNEMPLOYMENT DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 4100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4106 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OBJECT SUI3TOTAL DIVISION TOTAL_ r 7. 700. 00 7, 700. 00 MONTHLY EXP YTD EXPND. 1, 967. 24 0. 00 0. 00 275. 25 54. 50 2, 296. 99 5, 759. 01 5, 759. 01 ,Y 31. 80 0. 00 0. 00 5, 430. 98 5, 462. 78 13, 518. 78 15, 897. 00 15, 897. 00 3, 894. 11 0. 00 0. 00 275. 25 435. 46 4, 604. 82 230, 128. 51 230, 128. 51 52. 56 0. 00 49. 00 5, 430. 98 5, 5321: S4 240, 265. 87 19, 565. 00 19, 565. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 15, 897. 00 19, 565. 00 r 0. 00 0. 00 7, 700. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE is 0. 00 20, 410. 89 16. 0 0. 00 365. 00 0. 0 0. 00 365. 00 0. 0 0. 00 3, 076. 75 8. 2 0. 00 3, 536. 5 4 10. 9 0. 00 27, 754. 18 14. 2 0. 00 140, 501. 49 62. 0 0. 00 140, 501. 49 62. 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 247. 14 1.7. 5 1, 050. 00 0. 0 201. 00 19. 6 64, 569. 02 7. 7 66, 067. 46 7. 7 0. 00 234, 323. 13 50. 6 0. 00 0. 00 288. 55 288. 55 288. 55 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17, 435. 00 52. 8 17, 435. 00 52. 8 10, 211. 45 2. 7 10, 211. 45 2. 7 27, 646. 45 41. 7 7, 700. 00 0. 0 7, 700. 00 0. 0 7, 700. 00 0. 0 a; 1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE--FA454 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT (BY FUND) 4') TIME. 19-24:;74 FROM 08/01/91 TO 08/31/91 ,' FUND 1)IV OB.!T DE --.SCR 705 INSURANCE FUND f"! 1217 WORKERS COMP '01 T;4 f, 0 - s 4 APPROPR IATION DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT •100 PERSONAL SERVICES 1102 REGULAR SALARIES/MISC 1110 VACATION/SICK PAY OFF 4111 ACCRUAL CASH IN 4180 RETIFREMENT 4192 WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR 4198 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4200 CONTRACT SERVICES 4201 CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE 12_1 CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT OBJECT SUBTOTAL 4300 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES/OTHER 4305 OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 4316 TRAINING OJJECT SUBTOTAL-. 31. 000. 00 465. 00 465. 00 4.2.44. 00 290. 000. 00 6, 834. 00 333. 008. 00 47. 000. 00 0. 00 47, 000. 00 400. 00 2. 000. 00 2. 400. 00 DIVISION TOTAL_ 382, 408. 00 1213 MEDICARE DEPT: MGMT/SUPPORT 1100 PERSONAL SERVICES 4189 MEDICARE BENEFITS OBJECT SUBTOTAL DIVISION TOTAL. DEPARTMENT TOTAL FUND TOTAL_ REPORT TOTALS n ��))Z 9 `fl g 4H ) MONTHLY EXP YTD EXFND. 2, 753. 76 5. 467. 14 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 380.33 380.33 42, 008. 53 42. 117. 53 80. 78 749. 32 45, 223. 40 48. 714. 32 798. 21 23, 095. 21 406. 59 406. 59 1, 204. 80 23, 501. 80 PAGE 0049 DATE 09/16/91 16. O% OF YEAR COMPLETE ENCUMBRANCE UNENC BALANCE 0. 00 25, 532. 86 17. 6 0.00 465. 00 0.0 0. 00 465. 00 0.0 0. 00 3, 863. 67 8. 9 0. 00 247. 002. 47 14. 5 0. 00 6, 084. 68 10. 9 0. 00 284, 293. 68 14. 6 0. 00 23, 904. 79 49. 1 0. 00 406. 59- 0. 0 0. 00 23. 498. 20 50. 0 25. 38 42. 60 0. 00 357. 40 10. 6 0. 00 82. 53 0. 00 1, 917. 47 4. 1 25. 38 125. 13 0. 00 2, 274. 87 5. 2 46, 453. 58 72, 341.25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 912. 197. 00 912, 197. 00 24. 785, 526. 00 0. 00 75. 869. 36 75, 869. 36 2, 5834, 983. 72 0. 00 310, 066. 75 18. 9 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 332, 172. 12 332, 172. 12 4. 264, 722. 92 0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0 o. 00 '0. 00 288. 55 579, 736. 33 288. 55 579, 736. 33 53, 866. 97 20, 466, 936. 11 K, "<;-'�tf +yw(.'''";' �,++•,•'Y!.'p 1� ?f �., , •.sr,l:.,tt .�. n�'ii v -.rt, 7','.,59r�� „i 3� %'� �� lb 0,0 36. 4 716. 4 17. 4 '•J cJ (1) C") C.) 0 CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - AUGUST 1991 FUND NUMBER GENERAL ACCOUNT 8/1/91 BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS WARRANTS ADJUSTMENTS 8/31/91 BALANCE 001 GENERAL 105 LIGHTING DISTRICT 109 VEHICLE PARKING DIST. 110 PARKING 115 STATE GAS TAX 120 COUNTY GAS TAX 125 PARK REC.FAC.TAX 126 RAILROAD RT.OF WAY 127 6% UTILITY USERS TAX 140 CDBG 145 PROPOSITION A FUND 150 GRANT FUND 155 CROSSING GUARD DISTRICT 160 SEWER MAINTENANCE 170 POLICE ASSET SEIZURE 180 FIRE PROTECTION FUND 305 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 705 SELF INSURANCE FUND TRUST ACCOUNTS PAYROLL $2,568,200.29 1,405,630.86 96,311.93 268,212.11 674,497.32 <53,917.38> 1,762,483.11 987,666.20 77,398.05 122,763.74 386,405.92 263,858.39 64 ,637 .68 943,043.14 99,767.81 453,655.59 3,458,530.07 303,753.45 $13,887,720.32 $ 792,085.85 2,421.43 15,000.00 196,785.09 - 0- - 0- 10,396.00 64,356.99 96 ,535.44 -0- 13,850.00 0- 13,850.00 - 0- 666.62 492.54 1,537,032.15 6,292 .59 - 0- -0- $2,735,914.70 $ 920,516.12 74,000.01 9,590.56 18,645.14 1,810,048.32 95,420.00 382,169.18 7,393.20 1,326.30 -0- 13,796.30 40,503.73 3,021.15 1,394,361.50 37,272.45 15,598.59 374,445.83 77,436.87 $5,275,545.25 $ 905,897.16 28,498.98 5,454.03 74,701.44 - 0- - 0- - 0- 446,710.00 - 0- - 0- 7,439.60 - 0- 2,114.92 14,219.13 29,036.38 - 0- 896,046.43 76,256.87 $2,486,374.94 $ 458,360.66 2,819.76 2,392.89 283,370.30 809,159.12 2,903.42 105,036.42 - 0- 87,500.00 122,763.74 73.00 231,818.04 222.00 114,317.16 196,972.33 - 0- 2,829,553.57 57.18 $5,247,319.59 $ 2,916,544.44 1,450,733.56 125,325.38 136,899.29 1,573,230.98 35,695.78 2,050,011.87 698,988.89 87,759.79 -0- 406,539.62 72,544.08 65,988.53 2,209,360.89 1,448,063.70 475,546.77 107,375.90 304,876.27 $14,165,485.74 BALANCE RECEIVED PAID BALANCE STATEMENT BALANCE $12,790,195.64 INACTIVE DEPOSIT $572 998.70 $539,247.15 $3,453.18 INACTIVE DEPOSIT HELD BY FISCAL RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY $243,743.67 INTEREST RECEIVED TO DATE AGENT $638,502.69 $638,025.76 $3,930.11 GARY BRU SEPTEMBE , 19, 1991 C _ TR ASURE GENERAL $ 912,257.59 PAYROLL 3,652.41 915,910.00 109,688.49 806,221.51 INACTIVE DEPOSIT 13,363,194.34 BALANCE 14,169,415.85 OUTSTANDING CHECKS September 10, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council September 24, 1991 CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES Recommendation: It is recommended that the following claims which have been submitted to the City Clerk's Office be denied and referred to the City's Liability Claims Administrator. 1. Edstrom, Joel S. and Adams, Margaret I., 650 La Loma Road, Pasadena, CA 91105, filed August 26, 1991, alleged negligent operation of (City) vehicle caused property damage. Note: The City's liability claims administrator has recommended that this claim be denied. This damage results from a July 4th incident in which four vehicles were damaged following a City vehicle hitting them while attempting to avoid a vehicle which had turned left in front of it. The ,other claims presented to the City in regards to this incident have previously been denied by the Council. A claim has been filed with the insurance carrier for the operator of the vehicle who turned left. 2. Murray, Michael E., represented by Jeffery S. Pop & Associates, filed September 3, 1991 alleging dangerous condition and improper design of roadway. 3. Price, Aimee E., represented by Jeffery S. Pop & Associates, filed September 3, 1991 alleging dangerous condition and improper design of roadway. Note: The City's Liability Claims Administrator has recommended that this claim be denied by action of the City Council to commence the statute of limitations on filing of a lawsuit against the City. These claims are available for review in the Personnel Office. Respectfully subjtted, Concur: Robert A. Blackwood-- Kevin B. Northc aft Risk Manager pers/claims - 1 - City Manager if September 17, 1991 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission September 24, 1991 SUBJECT: LOCATION: CONFIRMATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION INTERPRETATION OF APPLICABLE SETBACKS ON "HALF -LOTS" ON ALLEY/STREET CORNERS APPLIES TO 215 4TH STREET AND OTHER LOTS IN SIMILAR SITUATION Recommendation Staff recommends confirmation of the Planning Commission interpretation and Policy Statement by minute order. Background At their meeting of August 20, 1991, the Planning Commission determined the applicable setbacks for the situation at 215 4th Street as follows That the alley side be considered the front yard, and be subject to alley setback requirements. - The street side be considered the side yard. They further adopted a policy statement to apply this interpretation for all similar alley/street corner "half -lots." The City Council confirmed a similar interpretation on February 26, 1991 made for a half -lot at 517 Hermosa Avenue, at the corner of Hermosa Avenue and the Alley at 6th Court. Section 1101 of the zoning ordinance assigns the Planning Commission the duty to make interpretations when an ambiguity exists with respect to yard requirements, and requires the City Council's confirmation. Analysis Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for the analysis. Although this "half -lot" situation is not particularly common, it appears that about 20 lots are in a similar situation. The confirmation of the Planning Commission's policy statement will 1 allow staff to apply this interpretation in all cases without requiring action of the Commission or Council. „ -C©NC UR : Michael'Schubach_----,, Pla in g Dire,ctor evin B. North aft, en Robertson Associate Planner City Manager Attachments 1. P.C. Policy Statement 2. P.C. Minutes 3. P.C. Staff Report/Attachments 4. C.C. Minutes 2/26/91 a/pcsrint 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 POLICY STATEMENT P.C. 91-2 A POLICY STATEMENT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO INTERPRET THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR A "HALF -LOT" AT 215 4TH STREET IN THE R-3 ZONE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1101 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO AMBIGUITIES IN THE CODE, AND TO APPLY INTERPRETATION TO ALL SIMILAR LOTS WHICH ARE LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF AN ALLEY AND A STREET WITH THE NARROW PORTION OF THE LOT FRONTING ON THE ALLEY AND THE LONGER SIDE FRONTING ON THE STREET; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a hearing on August 20, 1991, to interpret the setback requirements for a half -lot in the R-3 zone and made the following findings: A. The subject lot, and other lots in the same situation, because of their unusual characteristics, do not fit into the definitions and standards of the zoning ordinance to enable staff to determine the applicable setback; B. The narrow side of such lots front on an alley and the longer side on a street, while the zoning map does not indicate what the front setback would be from either side; C. For consistency with requirements of surrounding lots it is most appropriate to consider the alley frontage the front, and to use alley setback requirements, and thus to consider the Street frontage the side yard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby interpret that the yard requirements for the subject lot at 215 4th Street and all such similar lots shall be as follows: 1. Front Yard: the front yard shall be along the Alley frontage and shall be subject to a setback requirement of three (3) feet for the ground floor and one (1) foot for the second floor and above; 2. The street frontage shall be considered the side yard, and shall be subject to setback requirement of 10% of the lot width. 3 VOTE: AYES: Comms.Marks,Stifano,Chmn.Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None AbSENT: Comms.Di Monda,Peirce CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Policy Statement 91-2 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, Califorpia,1 at te"ir regular meeting of August 20, 1991:- Christine Ketz, Chairperson /5c7/ Date Michael Schubach, S retary a/persint sch►•ach stated the removal of a chainlink construction fence is necessary. 1 Staff ecommends conditions that if auto sales business continues beyo.• one year, la •soaping improvements be required and unused structures be emoved, with currenbusiness hours limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. M Schubach discussed thes Condition recommendations with Comm. Stifano. Public Hearing open-• by Chmn. Ketz at 7:33 p.m. Mr. Andrew Mattingly, Ge -ral Manager of The Parking = ace, 125 Pacific Coast Highway, agreed with all Coni tions except #14, remo -1 of chainlink fence. He stated removal will nullify hi- security and incr-=se his expense. Public Hearing closed by Churn. Ketz . 7:35 Churn. Ketz and Mr. Schubach discussed o i- s including reinforcing the current chainlink fence and removal from the orth s •e only. MOTION by Churn. Ketz, secondee by Comm. Marks approve CUP 91-12, with a change in Condition #14, t remove the fence on •e north side and change Condition #15 to include a requirement to remove the .ence on the south side if the business continu more than one year. AYES: Comm 7Marks, Stifano and Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: 7None ABSENT: ,6- Comms. Di Monda and Peirce HEARINGS PS 91-2 -- INTERPRETATION OF APPLICABLE SETBACK ON HALF LOT AT 215 4TH STREET AND TO APPLY TO ALL SIMILAR ALLEY/STREET CORNER LOTS. Recommended Action: To interpret the alley frontage the front yard and the street frontage the side yard. Mr. Schubach gave the staff report. Staff recommends a General Policy State- ment be adopted for applications of this interpretation for all similar alley/ street corner half lots throughout Hermosa Beach. No one wished to address the commission regarding this matter. Chinn. Ketz established the proposed construction would be oriented to Bay View. Comm. Marks and Mr. schubach discussed the definition of a Street vs. an Alley, establishing a Street is over 20' width. MOTION by Comm. Marks, seconded by Chmn. Ketz to adopt Policy Statement PS 91-2. AYES: Comm. Marks, Stifano and Chmn. Ketz NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Comms. Di Monda and Peirce .r P.C. Minutes 8-20-91 August 13, 1991 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission August 20, 1991 SUBJECT: DETERMINATION OF APPLICABLE SETBACKS ON "HALF -LOTS" ON ALLEY/STREET CORNERS LOCATION: APPLIES TO 215 4TH STREET AND OTHER LOTS IN SIMILAR SITUATION Recommendation Staff recommends that the alley side of the lot at 215 4th Street be interpreted as the front yard, the 4th Street side as the side yard, and to use alley setback -requirements for the front yard. Staff recommends that a general, policy statement be adopted for application of this interpretation for all similar alley/street corner half -lots. Background This issue has come in response to a preliminary request to construct a single family dwelling at 215 4th Street. Pursuant to Section 1101 of the zoning ordinance when an ambiguity exists with respect to yard requirements it is the Planning Commission's duty to set forth the finding and interpretation by resolution. Said resolution must be ultimately confirmed by Council. At the meeting of February 5, 1991, the Planning a determination on a very similar request, at 517 at the corner of Hermosa Avenue and the alley 6th case the Commission determined that 6th Court be and Hermosa Avenue the side. Commission made Hermosa Avenue, Court. In that the front yard, Analysis The subject lot is a half lot with frontage on 4th Street and the alley known as Bayview in the R-3 zone. Section 603 pertaining to front yards requires a setback as shown on the zoning map. However a number is not indicated for either the 4th Street or Bayview frontages. Pursuant to Section 233 the definition of a "front lot line" is the line separating the lot from the street --which would mean 4th Street. However, it also states that in the case of a corner lot the front lot line shall be the line separating the narrowest street frontage from the street. Therefore, if Bayview were considered to be a street, it would be the front. - 6- Given the above noted ambiguities staff is unable to make a staff level interpretation. Nonetheless, staff believes that the most logical interpretation, in order to be consistent with other lots on the block, would be to consider Bayview the front, and require the same setback required for the alley side on the other lots on the block (3 feet on the ground floor and 1 foot on the second), and to consider 4th Street the side yard resulting in a setback of 10% of the width, or 3 feet. This interpretation is consistent with the interpretation adopted for 517 Hermosa Avenue. As such, staff believes that a policy statement should be adopted which would apply, this interpretation to this situation and all similar situation p' throughout the City. CONCUR Michael Schubach PlanninDirector IA ) Lik--4P William Grove, Building and Safety Director Attachments 1. Proposed Policy Statement 2. Letter and Site Map 3. Excerpt from zoning map 7 Kobertson Associate Planner a/pcsrint Douglas G. Robins 415 Herondo Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Hermosa Beach Planning Dept. c/o Mr. Ken Robertson Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Re: Agenda Item for August 20, 1991 Meeting Subject: Interpretation of Zoning Requirements Dear Sirs: Per my discussions with Mr. Ken Robertson in your dept., would you please render an interpretation of the setback requirements for 215 4th street. This lot is located on the N.W corner of 4th St. and Bayview Dr. (see attachment) Request is respectfully made to interpret the "front" of the lot to be along Bayview Dr. This would then require a 5' setback in the rear, 3' on each side, 3' for the garage along Bayview and 1' above the first floor along Bayview. Thank you in advance. 8 Very truly yours Douglas G. Robins 1 DDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH _ _ M. B.1 59 - 60 M. B. 17 - 137 0. 1074 NIUM NO. 33370 • M. $. 882- 79 CONDOMINIUM PARCEL';. MAP CONDOMINIUM PARCEL, MAP CONDOMINIUM PARCEL MAP CONDOMINIUM CONDOMINIU. PARCEL N CONDOMINIL PARCEL N CONDOMINIUt PARCEL tv P M. 186 -49 P M. 130 -41 P. M. 14 1 - 20 This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Director Antich responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this matter was: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au- thorize staff to utilize the services of Lawrence R. Moss & Associates for the provision of preparing concep- tual landscape drawings of the Greenbelt parking lot on an hourly basis with a cost not to exceed $2,500, and with the understanding that the drawings would be for plantings and irrigation only, not for paving. Motion Creighton, second Mayor Sheldon. So ordered, noting the objections of Essertier and Midstokke. (g) Recommendation to confirm Planning Commission inter- pretation regarding applicable setbacks on a half lot at 517 Hermosa Avenue. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated February 19, 1991. Action: To approve the interpretation of the Planning Commission of the applicable setbacks for the property at 517 Hermosa Avenue as: 1) the front yard shall be the 6th Court frontage and shall be subject to a setback of 3 feet from the ground floor and 1 foot for the second floor and above; and, 2) the Hermosa Avenue frontage shall be considered the side yard, and shall be subject to a setback re- quirement of 10% of the lot width of 3.36 feet. (h) Recommendation to send letter to County of Los Angeles regarding Emergency Ambulance Agreement request. Memo- randum from Public Safety Director Steve Wisniewski dat- ed January 14, 1991. (i) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct staff to send a letter to the County indicating that the City intends to continue providing the same services that we have in the past and that we are not interested in entering into a contract at this time. Recommendation to approve allocation of monies from Vehicle Parking District Fund to support the R/UDAT design study for the downtown area. Memorandum from General Services Director Cindy Wilson dated February 19, 1991. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. City Council Minutes 02-26-91 Page 7396 fop September 6, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 24, 1991 REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT FOR ONE GENERAL SERVICES OFFICER Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council extend for thirty (30) days the temporary appointment of one (1) General Services Officer. Background: There is currently one vacant General Services Officer position which is being filled on a temporary basis. Filling this position is being held pending completion of a review of department staffing levels. Analysis: Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach City Code precludes a temporary appointment of an individual to a permanent Civil Service position for more than six -months without approval from the City Council every thirty days. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director rab/extend - 1 - Concur: Kevin B. Northcr'aft City Manager ti September 16, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 24, 1991 RECOMMENDATION TO CHANGE BUY-OUT FEES FOR METERED PARKING SPACES Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the change in: 1. buy-out fees in metered parking spaces in the downtown area to $15.00 per space/day. 2 to approve resolution 91 - in the Downtown area. Background: buy out of parking meters Since 1987 the City has charged a flat per day fee of $10.00 per metered parking space for use of those spaces, in lieu of "feeding" the meters. Such fees are usually charged to film companies, sports event promoters, and other special event permittees. During the past fiscal year, this represents an estimated annual revenue source of approximately $5,000. Since we do not keep track of meter collections by sections, we were not able to determine what actual cost of a meter would be per day. Analysis: Currently, the buy-out charge to park in the downtown lots is $25.00 per stall/day summer and $12.00 per stall/day winter. Raising the metered stall buy-out fees in the downtown area will help to discourage the use of the metered parking spaces merely because the buy-out is cheaper, and thus allowing for use and turn -over of the meters adjacent to the stores, and helping alleviate some of the concerns the merchants have expressed, regarding access to their stores. Obviously, some of the users may, due to the added increase, choose not to use Hermosa Beach as their venue. This may be off -set by the larger film companies who will continue to utilize this area, and the additional fee increase. The highest user bought a total of 118 meter days; the lowest user bought 6 meter days. Average usage over the fiscal year thirty-seven meter days. Alternatives: 3 1. Increase the fees by a lesser amount. im .r. 2. Prohibit parking at meters in the Downtown area 3. Prohibit special event etc. parking at meters. CONCUR: eny L. Staten, Acting General Services Director Af Kevin B. N•rthc`aft, City Manager Mary C. Rooney, Community Resources Director Respectfully submitted, Henry L. Staten, Acting General Services Director by Michele D. Tercero, Administrative Aide NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department 4 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 i 14 15 16 17 '8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 90-5422 SCHEDULE 6 CHARGES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS HELD IN THE CITY ON CITY PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City Council strives to equitably administer major events held within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council strives for equitable rates. WHEREAS, the City Council strives to bring buy of meters more in line with rates charged in the City owned parking lots in V.P.D. #1, thus allowing for use and turn -over of the meter adjacent to the stores, and helping alleviate some of the concerns the merchants have expressed, regarding access to their stores. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does adopt the following charges: To amend schedule 6 of Resolution No. 90-5422 as follows: Filming: ATTEST: Commercial $15/day Parking PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1991. PRESIDENT of the City Council, and MAYOR of Hermosa Beach, California - APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY B4CIcOR a1/ND AM M T ER /41 DATE: September 17, 1991 TO: General Services Department FROM: Allright Parking RE: Lot Rental Rates In response to your request for our lot rental rates, please note the following: Summer Rental Rate: $25.00 per space Winter Rental Rate: $12.00 per space The above rates are charged to anybody, movie crew or otherwise, seeking to rent spaces off Lots A, B, C or H. The spaces are rented out on a reserved basis, thereby justifying the premium charged. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Tony Faggioli, Manager Allright Parking Hermosa Beach CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager FROM: William M. Glickman, Interim Director of Public Works. SUBJECT: Stormwater Permit Program DATE: September 17, 1991 For your information, on Tuesday, September 3, 1991, this office submitted the following information and material to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works in partial compliance with the City's obligation: 1. Existing procedures to detect and address illegal discharges and all illicit disposal practices. 2. Existing practices to control pollutants in storm water/urban run off from construction sites. 3. Existing storm water/urban run off management practices and existing best management practices for the control of pollutants in discharges from residential, commercial and industrial areas. On Thursday, September 12th, additional information was furnished as follows: A map showing the alignment and outer water shed boundary for all City owned storm drains. This completes the City's current obligation. In addition, we will be doing the following to complete with future requirements. 1. Standard Industrial Code (SIC) Classification For Business The NPDES permit requires us to identify, for a given set of SIC Codes, the businesses contained within each drainage area. The appendix provided by the County contains a list of the SIC Codes for the businesses we are to identify. A computerized data base has been established by the County to facilitate collection of this data. A copy of this data base is provided to the City on two 3-1/2" floppy diskettes. Engineering staff is currently assigning Standard Industrial Code for the existing businesses within the City. Upon completion of this inventory, the City will forward a copy of its business inventory to the County for merging into the County's control data base. 2. Early Action Best Management Practices (BMP's) The City was asked to review its existing BMP's and develop a preliminary list of early action BMP's for possible implementation within its jurisdiction. Staff is studying the possible early action BMP's to comply with the County request. The County will be compiling a list of early action BMP's from all co-permitees for review at the next co-permitee meeting. I. Maintenance of storm drain facilities II. Waste management III. Illegal discharge/disposal practices IV. Sanitary sewer system practice V. Road maintenance VI. Construction pworks/WMGSPP September 3, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 24, 1991 AGREEMENT WITH EDWARD S. KREINS FOR CITY MANAGER RECRUITMENT SERVICES Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Agreement with Edward S. Kreins for City Manager Recruitment Services. Background: At the City Council meeting of September 10, 1991, the City Council selected Edward S. Kreins' proposal to conduct the recruitment for City Manager. The attached Agreement contains the City's standard provisions when contracting for professional services. Respectfully submitted, Sevin B. Northcraft City Manager Attachment contract/agr AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of 1991, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City", and EDWARD S. KREINS, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". W ITNESSET H: This Agreement is made by and between City and Consultant for the consideration hereafter named, as follows: SECTION 1. SCOPE OF WORK Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform the following described work: To conduct professional executive recruitment for the position of City Manager. Services to include, but not necessarily be limited to, placement of advertisment(s) in professional publications, receiving resumes of prospective applicants, preliminary screening of resumes received, conducting preliminary background checks on selected applicants, and scheduling of interviews before the City Council of selected candidates. Consultant to provide assistance to the City Council in obtaining agreement with the selected candidate at the request of the City Council. SECTION 2, TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION OF SERVICES The services provided for under this Agreement shall begin on September 11, 1991. The services provided under this Agreement shall be completed on or before February 28, 1992, unless other wise extended upon mutual agreement between the parties. SECTION 3. PAYMENT FOR CONSULTANT'S SERVICES Consultants fee to provide the services described in Section 1 of this Agreement shall not exceed $4,500 and reimbursement for expenses shall not exceed $1,000. Billings shall be sent by Consultant to City on a periodic basis as agreed to by the parties. The billings shall be sent to: City of Hermosa Beach, Att: Finance Department. SECTION 4. CHANGES IN SCOPE OF WORK No additional fees shall be paid by City for additional consulting services not included in this Agreement without the written approval of the City prior to undertaking such work. SECTION 5. TERMINATION City may, without cause, terminate this Agreement at any time prior to completion by Consultant of any of the services required hereunder. Notice of Termination of this Agreement shall be given in writing to Consultant, and shall be sufficient to complete when same is deposited in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid. In the event this Agreement it terminated by City, Consultant shall be paid the value of services performed by him pursuant to this Agreement prior to the date of termination thereof, such value to be the total to which he shall have become entitled, as determined by City, less the amount of any payment previously made. SECTION 6. NO ASSIGNMENTS Consultant shall not assign any portion of the work under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the City. SECTION 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor, and shall not be an employee of the City. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. SECTION 8. INDEMNITY Consultant shall be responsible for all injuries to persons and for damages to real or personal property of City, caused by or resulting from any activity or operation of Consultant, its employees, or its agents during the progress of, or connected with, the rendition of services hereunder. Consultant shall defend and hold harmless and indemnify City and all officers and employees of Agency from all costs and claims for damages to real or personal property, or personal injury to any third party resulting from the activity of itself, employees, or its agents. wimps 9. CONSULTANT HOT AN LOENT Except as City may specify in writing, CCnsult It shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on bc,half of the City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever. CONSULTANT APPROVED A8 TO PORM: CITY D�i2�ORH Y ATTORN Y BY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY _ _ September 16, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council September 24 , 1991 RECOMMENDATION RE: PROCEDURES AND TIMELINE FOR CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE RENEWAL Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the procedures and time line for the renewal of the Cable Television Franchise. Background: On December 29, 1990, Multivision Cable Television notified the City on the commencement of formal proceedings regarding the renewal of the Hermosa Beach Cable Television Franchise. The Multivision notification to the City, of formal proceedings was made pursuant to section 626 of the 1984 Cable Communication Act. This request was made thirty six months prior to the expiration of the Cable Television Franchise (October 10, 1993) . The formal renewal process sets in motion specific procedures and timetables which govern the renewal process and assures the full notification and participation of the general public. Analysis: Formal Franchise Renewal Procedures: City must commence proceedings to: Conduct an assessment of Multivision's past performance; Identify future cable related community needs and interests; Provide the public with adequate notice and the opportunity to participate in proceedings. City of Hermosa Beach Cable Television Timeline Begin Needs Study Start date: 9/23/91 To assess cable operator's past performance; _1_ 1e To identify future cable related community needs and interests Completion Date: 5/5/92 11/18/92 Selection of advisory board. 5/5/92 5/6/92 6/6/92 Presentation of needs study & recommendations to City Council for concurrance. Tentative completion of needs study. Upon completion of the needs assessment the Cable Operator (Multivision) will have 30 days to review the study and its findings and submit a renewal proposal to the City. Multivision submits renewal proposal The City has 90 days to review proposal and allow for public comment. The City has 120 days from the completion of the needs study, in which to decide to renew franchise or issue a preliminary assessment that the franchise should not be renewed. 9/6/92 Decision on renewal end of the 120 day required time period The decision to renew the franchise ends this process. If during the above process it is found that the franchise should not be renewed, the City would then conduct a renewal denial process as detailed in the 1984 Cable Act (attachment #2). Under the terms of the 1984 Cable Act the proceedings would be based on the following items: Whether the operator has substantially complied with the material terms of the franchise and applicable law; Whether the quality of the operator's service, (defined as its day to day customer operations, i.e. response to consumer complaints on billing, signal quality, not its programming service, meets community needs; Whether the operator has the legal, financial and technical ability to deliver on the promises in its renewal proposal; and The reasonableness of the company's renewal proposal to meet future community needs, considering the costs. No time limit is provided in the Cable Act for this formalized renewal denial proceeding or for court review. The Cable Act is silent on the issue of extending the franchise during this administrative process. This area will likely be governed by normal equitable standards for grant of a court stay. Staff is currently contacting organizations in the community in preparation for the needs assessment. It is the objective of the staff to involve the entire community in the renewal process, in order for the City and its residents to fully develop and use the cable television as a comprehensive community communications system. attachments: #1 Letter from Multivision dated Dec. 29, 1990 #2 1984 Cable Act Section 626 Renewal procedures Respectfully submitted Warren S. Carter Cable Television Coordinator Concur: Mary /C.Rooney Dire tor, Community Resources Dept. Kevin B. Northc aft City Manager CITY MANAGER COMMENT: I have directed staff to - 1) maximize the cable company's finan- cial contributions to this effort per prior discussions due to their shortcomings, and 2) coordinate to the extent possible our efforts with Manhattan Beach, including working to cause the next franchises to expire on the same date. I\Iulii\'isiori December 29, 1990 Mr. Kevin Northcraft City Managet CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Mr. Northcraft: 'o-CE1VE17 JAN 2199) ik Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and introducing me to your cable television staff. It was extremely beneficial to my understanding as I begin my tenure with MultiVision Cable TV. As I stated, we at MultiVision have appreciated the Opportunity to serve the citizens of Hermosa Beach with cable television service. We have worked hard to provide the high quality cable service this community and its residents demand and we look forward to providing that service for many years to come. Therefore, we are most interested in working with the City towards the renewal of our franchise agreement. As you know, the Federal Cable Communication Act of 1984 encourages franchisors and cable television companies to reach renewal agreements at anytime through an informal process of discussion and we look forward to negotiating a mutually satisfactorily agreement with you through this process. However, Section 626 of the Act also provides for commencement of a formal procedure. To preserve our statutory rights to the formal procedure, this letter is our official notice to you invoking that provision. Please note that the official legal name of the franchise holder that will renew the franchise is ML Media Partners, L.P. This letter is not intended to introduce a new formality into our discussions, nor is that the intention of the Federal Cable Communication Act of 1984. As we wish to engage in good faith discussions, we do not believe any action on your part is required at this time, and we would be willing to mutually defer commencement of formal proceedings pending the satisfactory completion of our informal negotiations. MultiVision Cable TV 3041 Miraloma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92806 71.169.0999 Mr. Kevin Northcraft Page Two In response to the City's interest in our public access plans and ensuring that a full discussion of the public access needs and interests of the citizens of Hermosa Beach occurs,.I believe the Public Access needs assessment proposed and submitted to the City by MultiVision in 1990, represents an acceptable methodology and a responsible effort to address these concerns. However, I also believe that we can add to this study to further ensure that we are providing those public access services our community is truly interested in. I read with great interest, the City consultants critique of MultiVision's public access needs assessment and appreciate the opportunity to review their findings.., As evidence of our good faith efforts to work with the City in improving Public Access in a way that would benefit the citizens of Hermosa Beach, MultiVision agrees to cover the cost of the consultants charges for the critique of our ascertainment study and to work with the City to identify the future cable related community needs and interests of the citizens of 'Hermosa Beach during the upcoming renewal period. Based upon our findings, we will then formalize our plans, taking into account the cost of meeting such needs and interests. As such, I am prepared to make myself and my staff available to facilitate this effort. In the meantime, we will continue to develop our Public Access operations. We are proud of the progress we have made and appreciate your recognition of our efforts. I thought you might find the enclosed article from the September 20, 1990 issue of the Beach Reporter interesting as it highlights our Public Access operations. I have asked by Programming and Technical staff to work closely with your staff to resolve the audio problems you indicated you were experiencing during your council meetings. I understand that the problem appears to be within the Chamber audio system itself. I will continue to monitor our progress on this matter, but please don't hesitate to call ma should you have any questions. Kevin, I appreciate your assistance and look forward to working with you. Should you have any questions or require any additional information regarding these matters, please don't hesitate to call me directly at.714/632-9222. Sincerely, • Donald R. Granger Regional Vice President DRG:sls enclosure 91 PUBLIC LAW 98-549 services required by the franchise at the time it was granted will be maintained after such modification. "(2) Any final decision by a franchising authority under this subsection shall be made in a public proceeding. Such decision shall be made within 120 days after receipt of such quessenbydthee franchising authority, unless such 120 day period is mutual agreement of the cable operator and the franchising authority. "(bX1) Any cable operator whose request for modification under subsection (a) has been denied by a final decision of a franchising authority may obtain modification of such franchise requirement( pursuant to the provisions of section 6643 (cation of a requirement fol 5. "(2) In the case of any proposed facilities or equipment, the court shall grant such modification on13 if the cable operator demonstrates to the court that— operator U "(A) it is commercially impracticable for the comply with such requirement; and "(B) the terms of the modification requested are appro riat, p because of commercial impracticability. requirement fo "(3) In the case of any proposed modification of a req services, the court shall grant such modification only if the cab operator demonstrates to the court that the mix, qu lily, w; of services required by the franchise at the timegrantedi, be maintained after such modification. "(c) Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b), a cable operator ma; upon 30 days' advance notice to the franchising authority, rea range, replace, or remove a particular cable service required by t1 franchise if— "(1) such service is no longer available to the operator; "(2) such service in available to the operator only upon t1 payment of a royalty required under section o cann document United States Code, which the cable operator "(A) is substantially in excess of the amount offer i payment required on the date of the operator's provide such service, and "(B) has not been specifically compensated for through rate increase or other adjustment. "(d) Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b), a cable operator m take such actions to rearrange a particular service from one sere tier to another, or otherwise offer the service, if the rates for all the service tiers involved in such actions are not subject to regu tion under section 623. "(e) A cable operator may not obtain modification under t section of any requirement for services relating to public, edu tional, or governmental access. term 'commercially impra "(f) For purposes of this section, the uirement applicable to a ca cable' means, with respect to any req operator, that it is commercially impracticable for the operator complywith such requirement as a result of a change in conditi which is beyond the control of the operator and the nonoccurre of which was a basic assumption on which the requirement 1 based. "RENEWAL "SEC. 626. (a) During the 6 -month period which begins with 36th month before the franchise expiration, the franchising aut Icy may on its own initiative, and shall at the request of the c (Rd .i-saC.supp. CABLE ACT OF 1984 92 operator, commence proceedings which afford the public in the franchise area appropriate notice and participation for the purpose of— "(1) identifying the future cable -related community needs and interests; and "(2) reviewing the performance of the cable operator under the franchise during the then current franchise term. "(bX1) Upon completion of a proceeding under subsection (a), a cable operator seeking renewal of a franchise may, on its own initiative or at the request of a franchising authority, submit a proposal for renewal. "(2) Subject to sectioh 624, any such proposal shall contain such material as the franchising authority may require, including propos- als for an upgrade of the cable system. ' "(3) The franchising authority may establish a date by which such proposal shall be submitted. • "(cX1) Upon submittal by a cable operator of a proposal to the franchising authority for the renewal of a franchise, the franchising authority shall provide prompt public notice of such proposal and, during the 4 -month period which begins on the completion of any proceedings under subsection (a), renew the franchise or, issue a preliminary assessment that the franchise should not be renewed and, at the request of the operator or on its own initiative, com- mence an administrative proceeding, after providing prompt public notice of such proceeding, in accordance with paragraph (2) to consider whether— "(A) the cable operator has substantially complied with the material terms of the existing franchise and with applicable law; "(11) the quality of the operator's service, Including signal quality, response to consumer complaints, and billing practices, but without regard to the mix, quality, or level of cable services or other services provided over the system, has been reasonable in Tight of community needs; "(C) the operator has the financial, legal, and technical ability to provide the services, facilities, and equipment as set forth in the operator's proposal; and "(D) the operator's proposal is reasonable to meet the future cable -related community needs and interests, taking into ac- count the cost of meeting such needs and interests. "(2) In any proceeding under paragraph (1), the cable operator shall be afforded adequate notice and the cable operator and the franchise authority, or its designee, shall be afforded fair opportu- nity for full participation, including the right to introduce evidence (including evidence related to issues raised in the proceeding under subsection (a)), to require the production of evidence, and to question witnesses. A transcript shall be made of any such proceeding. "(3) At the completion of a proceeding under this subsection, the franchising authority shall issue a written decision granting or denying the proposal for renewal based upon the record of such proceeding, and transmit a copy of such decision to the cable operator. Such decision shall state the reasons therefor. "(d) Any denial of a proposal for renewal shall be based on one or more adverse findings made with respect to the factors described in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of subsection (c)(1), pursuant to the record of the proceeding under subsection (c). A franchising author- ity may not base a denial of renewal on a failure to substantially r D rio 93 PUBLIC LAW 98-549 comply with the material terms of the franchise under subsection (cX1XA) or on events considered under subsection (c)(1XB) in any case In which a violation of the franchise or the events considered under subsection (cX1)(B) occur after the effective date of this title unless the franchising authority has provided the operator with notice and the opportunity to cure, or in any case in which it is documented that the franchising authority has waived its right to object, or has effectively acquiesced. '(eX1) Any cable operator whose proposal for renewal has been denied by a final decision of a franchising authority made pursuant to this section, or has been adversely affected by a failure of the franchising authority to act in accordance with the procedural requirements of this section, may appeal such final decision or failure pursuant to the provisions of section 635. "(2) The court shall grant appropriate relief if the court finds that— "(A) any action of the franchising authority is not in compli- ance with the procedural requirements of this section; or "(B) in the event of a final decision of the franchising author- ity denying the renewal proposal, the operator has demon- strated that the adverse finding of the franchising authority with respect to each of the factors described in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of subsection (cX1) on which the denial is based Is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence, bused on the record of the proceeding conducted under subsection (c). "(f) Any decision of a franchising authority on a proposal for renewal shall not be considered final unless all administrative review by the State has occurred or the opportunity therefor has Iased. '(g) For purposes of this section, the term 'franchise expiration' means the date of the expiration of the term of the franchise, as provided under the franchise, as it was in effect on the date of the enactment of this title. "(h) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) through (g) of this section, a cable operator may submit a proposal for the renewal of a franchise pursuant to this subsection at any time, and a franchising authority may, after affording the public adequate notice and opportunity for comment, grant or deny such proposal at any time (including after proceedings pursuant to this section have commenced). The provisions of subsections (a) through (g) of this section shall not apply to a decision to grant or deny a proposal under this subsection. The denial of a renewal pursuant to this subsection shall not affect action on a renewal proposal that is submitted in accordance with subsections (a) through (g). "CONDITIONS OF SALE "SEc. 627. (a) If a renewal of a franchise held by a cable operator is denied and the franchising authority acquires ownership of the cable system or effects n transfer of ownership of the system to another person, any such acquisition or transfer shall be— "(1) at fair market value, determined on the basis of the cable system valued as a going concern but with no value allocated to the franchise itself, or "(2) in the case of any franchise existing on the effective date of this title, at a price determined in accordance with the September 17, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Council Meeting of September 24, 1991 MOUNTAIN RECREATION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by staff that Council direct staff to submit an application for proposed specific projects (Municipal Pier Renovation and Greenbelt Acquisition) to the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority to be considered for inclusion in the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. BACKGROUND As Council will recall, in November, 1990 the LA County Ballot included Proposition B, a bond measure sponsored by the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority. Two specific projects were included in the bond measure for Hermosa Beach; the Municipal Pier Renovation and Greenbelt Acquisition. If the measure had passed (it received 57% of the vote which did not meet the 2/3 majority requirement), the City would have received $7.5 million for these projects ($1.5 million for the Pier and $6 million for the Greenbelt). The Conservation Authority recently contacted the City to discuss their newly proposed ballot measure called the Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992, which would seek to create a special benefit assessment district in LA County to fund a projected $800 million in bonds that would serve to improve County wide parks and recreation areas (see attached information booklet). The supporters of this measure hope the Supervisors will place it on the June, 1992 Ballot. As was the case with Proposition B, if the Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992 passes (which would require a simple majority vote), the City would receive a one time per capita grant of approximately $252,000 and as with proposition B, those cities with approved proposed specific projects would receive additional funds. ANALYSIS The same logic applied in submitting an application for proposed specific projects for Proposition B exists with the Park, Beach and Recreation Act. With Council's approval, a successful application for funds will assure that if the measure passes, Hermosa Beach will receive direct benefits (if Proposition B had passed, Hermosa Beach would have received the -highest per capita return of any municipality in the County). Our projects carry significant criteria strength as they are of high regional significance; they are non -controversial; they contain Council and community support; and they supply recreation areas of significant value. Both projects have seen progress since our last application with the approval of funds for designing the Pier renovation (from the Coastal Conservancy) and 1 1t 'the recent Council approved Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Forestation Project. This should add credibility to the application and a testimony to the local commitment to the areas. It is important for a small municipality like Hermosa Beach, with a modest funding base to attempt wherever possible to obtain funds from regional sources to support regional facilities. Our beach visitorship alone numbers over three (3) million annually which fits well with the Conservation Authority's ideal for providing projects with more than local significance. The approved proposed specific projects for Proposition B included $6 million for the Greenbelt Acquisition and $1.5 million for the Pier. As the numbers have changed for both projects, staff recommends the following request be authorized for the Park, Beach and Recreation Act: 1) Hermosa Beach Pier Renovation Project: Request $2 million for the rehabilitation of the Pier to include examination and repairs as well as aesthetic and access improvements as conceptually approved by Council. 2) Hermosa Valley Greenbelt Acquisition: To request funding for the purchase of the railroad right-of-way (currently being funded by the UUT) at an approximate cost of $5.5 million ($4 million for Parcel A and $1.5 million for Parcel B). As the deadline for proposed specific projects is October 15, 1991, Council's immediate approval is requested. Specific information about this measure is still forthcoming and staff will return with a more thorough examination of the Recreation Act prior to December, 1991 so that Council may consider whether or not to draft a resolution in support of this measure. Other alternatives available to Council include: 1. Direct staff not to submit applications for proposed specific projects. 2. Direct staff to modify the recommended projects and/or funding amounts requested. 3. Select additional/different projects for inclusion in the measure. 4. Request more information. Concur: evin B. Northcr 'ft City Manager Respectfully submitted, Mar M. ooney, Director Co• y Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: a/Lz-e‘ickzkitio Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department RANCHO SIMI RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT August 30, 1991 MOUNTAINS RECREATION AND CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 3750 Solstice Canyon Road Malibu, California 90265 (213) 456-5046 Ms. Mary Rooney Acting Director, Community Services, City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 90254 Dear Ms. Rooney: MICHAEL BERGER Chairperson CAROLE B. STEVENS Vice Chairperson DON HUNT GEORGE LANGE JOSEPH T. EDMISTON, AICP Executive Officer TEX WARD Financial Officer Thank you for meeting with us to discuss the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. We deeply appreciate your time and the invaluable information and input you provided. Your city's support of this measure is critical and we look forward to working with you. Please note: we need to receive your city's proposed specific project information and completed questionnaires no later than October 15, 1991. As we discussed inour,meeting, a specific project must be a,sound environmental project of regional significance, must be noncontroversial and have strong local support from your city council and :from local groups.' Regional significance must be documented through evidence that the project is a significant resource; letters or studies documenting the regional use of the proposed project by surrounding communities; documentation that the project is or will be made available or advertised on a regional basis; and/or evidence that the project is the only one of its kind in the surrounding region. Thank you again and if you have any questions about the specific projects or any other aspect of the measure please do not hesitate to call Joscelyn Herzberg at (213)456-7807. Sincerely, 6bqr- \l/(1 Esther Feldman• oscelyn Herzberg Director, Research Director Project Analyst Special Projects Carolyn Chandler -Barr A public entity of the State of California exercistngJotnt powers of the Santa Monica Mountains Consenxincy the Congo Recreation and Park District and the Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District pursuant to Section 6500 et seq. of the Government Code. September 16, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 24, 1991 INCREASE IN COSTS FOR ADMINISTRATION AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE SLURRY SEALING PROJECT CIP 89-170 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the increase of funds in the amount of $342.50 for the increase of administration and inspection services provided by the consultant on the slurry sealing project. Background: On April 9, 1991, the City Council approved an agreement with Tierra Engineering Company for contract administration and inspection services. The project was for the repairing and slurry sealing of 43 asphalt streets west of Valley Drive. The City Council approved a contract with the consultant for a cost of $19,656 and a contingency cost of $2,344, for a not to exceed amount of $22,000. The staff was authorized to issue addenda as necessary within the budget limitations. Analysis: The consultant tried to keep his costs as low as possible while still providing the services that the City required. The first day on the job for the consultant was May 6, 1991. The contract was for only two (2) months, however the last day on the job was August 22, 1991. The inspector was well qualified and provided good service to the City. .Contact was maintained by the inspector with the City staff on a daily basis. During the course of the project, the staff issued a total of eight (8) change orders which resulted in an increase of thirty (30) days to the contract time. This increase in contract time to the contractor also required additional services from the consultant. The final total costs for contract administration and inspection will come to $22,342.50. Fiscal Impact: Approved Not to Exceed Amount Final Total Costs $22,000.00 22,342.50 Additional funds requested to be approved (From State Gas Tax - Fund 115) $ 342.50 - 1 - 1k • Alternatives: Other alternatives available to the City Council and considered by the staff are: 1. Do not pay the additional funds and only pay the consultant the not to exceed amount. (This does not appear to be fair because the consultant made an effort to stay within the approved amount even with the increase in time due to the change orders.) Respectfully submitted: Lynn Terry Deputy City Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance pworks/CCSR170 Concur: illiam Glic man, Interim Director of Public Works Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council September 18, 1991 City Council Meeting of September 24, 1991, CITY ATTORNEY OPINION REGARDING RECONSTRUCTION OF PARTIALLY DESTROYED NONCONFORMING CONDOMINIUMS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1) Adopt the attached resolution of intention directing the Planning Commission to study amending section 13-6 of the zoning code with respect to the method by which the value of damaged nonconforming structures is determined. 2) Receive and file this report. BACKGROUND This opinion was requested by the Director of Building and Safety due to numerous citizen requests for clarification. The opinion was subsequently requested by the City Council on May 14, 1991. ANALYSIS The attached opinion addresses the applicability of section 13-6 of the zoning code to nonconforming condominium projects and indicates that they would not be treated any differently than any other type of nonconforming building with a different form of ownership. The opinion does raise concerns regarding the method by which the value of damaged nonconforming structures is determined. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review that portion of the section for appropriate amendment. Kevin B. Northcra<ft City Manager Respectfully, William Grove, Director Dept. of Building and Safety - 1 - 1 RESOLUTION 91- 2 A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO STUDY 3 POSSIBLE AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 13-6 OF THE ZONING CODE WITH RESPECT TO :11H " • • • • "" " - DAMAGED 4 NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES. 5 6 7 A. The City Attorney has ex WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on September 24, 1991, and made the following Findings: 8 9 10 11 essed concern ding the method by whic. th- value o damage noncon arming structure to v fined purs .nt o Section of the zoning code. The present wording of Section 13-6 of the zoning code may be inconsistent with established case law` 12 d n. 13 14 15 16 II 1991, by: 17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby direct the Planning Commission to study possible amendments to Section 13-6 of the zoning code with respect to getriTaFTirdamaged nonconforming structures. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 24th day of September, 18 19 PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of•the City of Hermosa Beach, California 20 ATTEST: 21 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 22 23 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 24 25" 26 27 28 THOMAS W. STOEVER WILLIAM B. 6ARR CHARLES S. \OSE CONNIE CQOKE SANDIFER ROGCR W. SPRINGER E0WAAD W. LEE HEAIBERTO R DIAZ JAMCS DUFF MURPHY JANICE R. MIYAHIRA PAUL 1. YOSHtNAGA LAW Or flCEs OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR S. VOSE A PpO CSSIONAL CORPORATION IOOO SUNSET BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 (2131 280-9009 MEMORANDUM TO: William Grove, Building and Safety Director City of Hermosa Beach 4 FROM: harles S. Vose, City Attorney Beth S. Bergman, Asst. City Attorney DATE: September 18, 1991 RE: Reconstruction of Nonconforming Buildings Partially Destroyed TELGCOPIER (E13) 4B2•5335 CONCLUSIOS Section 13-6 of the Hermosa Beach Zoning Code is the applicable section with regards to determining the future of either apartment or condominium structures partially or completely destroyed. A literal reading of the statute would predict different results as to reconstruction e° the building dltheas naturenonconforming the or within current codes, pendenton buildir�c� itself. This is discussed below in greater detail, however, the gist of the matter is that the outcome depends on whether the units are attac ed or se orate. If attached, and less than 50 percent of the units (or 50 percent of the building) are destroyed, the owner will have the option of reconstructing the building in accorda the building e original zoning, ie. nonconformance. If, however, units are Separate, and certain units are destroyed, the individual units may be reconstructed, but only within the limitations of the Amended laws (ie. the units must in fact conform with the new zoning laws). I. The Policy Behind the code Most City Codes contain sections analogous ections sto uch 13-6 of the Hermosa City Code. The policy behind 13-6 is an attempt to arrive at a compromise between fairness OLIVER, STOEVER, BARR S. VOSE Memo re Reconstruction of Nonconforming Buildings partially Destroyed September 18, 1991 Page 2. to the current owner and the desire by the City to streamline zoning in conformity with civic interests. The policy aims only to attempt to increase conformity in situations arising out of accidental circumstances, ie. due to "destruction by fire, explosion or other casualty or Act of God, or the public enemy...." 6 13-6. This idea, namely the elimination of a nonconforming use where a building is partially destroyed, is explained in the California appellate court ruling in the case of O'Mara v. Council of the City of Newarh (1965) 238 Cal.App.2d 836, 48 Cal.Rptr. 208: Evidently courts have considered that where a nonconforming use has been carried on in a building which has been accidentally destroyed in large measure, it is not unreasonable to compel the owner to conform to zoning requirements thereafter. The investment in an improvement which may not be readily adaptable to a conforming use has been taken away from him by the accident and not by the ordinance. With the improvement substantially destroyed, the land on which it is located will presumably have approximately as much value for use in conformity with the ordinance as otherwise and the public interest in conformity with the ordinance will be served if he is not permitted to continue the nonconforming use. Id. at 838. Thus, the goal of reorienting the prior use, based only on the premise that the change in the building is due to an accident, and as a result it is timely to require the building to come into conformance where the damage to the structure is great. Incidently, various code sections differ as to the actual percentage of the building destroyed prior to demanding 'the building conform with amended zoning laws, with the range between 50 percent (ie. the Hermosa Code) and up to 75 percent of the building damaged. QUIVER, STOEVER, SARR & VOSE Memo re Reconstruction of Nonconforming Buildings Partially Destroyed September 18, 1991 Page 3. II, Efate ces in im got If Any, Between Dest upon tc Apartments versus Condominiums In your memorandum, you queried as to whether there would be a different result if a five unit apartment building was destroyed, as compared to the similar destruction of a five unit condominium. Assuming that in each situation, the units in the building are constructed as a single structure, the answer is that the result is tke same. As the code section reads, there is no distinction based on whether the building is owned by one or by several people. Instead, the only issue is whether more than 50 percent of one building is destroyed or not. For example, if the building consists of five separate, unattached units, the owners of the units of that burned down would in all likelihood have to comply with the current, laws in order to rebuild. This is because, in essence, 100 percent of their unit (building) was destroyed, and thus, greater than 50 percent of the "reasonable replacement value at the time of its destruction" has been lost. However, where the building in fact is one structure and less than 50 percent is destroyed, the owner or owners have a strong argument under the code to be allowed to rebuild along the lines of their original requirements, ie. in a nonconformance with the current zoning laws. For example, where 40 percent of the entire structure is damaged, the building complies with the limitations under § 13-6, as the building is considered as a whole, instead of as separate structures. III. The Measuring Stick For Assessing Dams to the Structure One area of area regards the assessed. Often to be determined, finding as to if ambiguity that has arisen in the past in this method by which the damage to the building is codes are ambiguous as to how this damagetis and the method chosen can greatly impact he the damage in fact exceeds 50 percent. , The court in O'Mara clarified this methodology by requiring that the comparison with the before and after version of the building be exactly that: in other words, whether the damage exceeds fifty percent is based on a comparison with the assessed value of the building at the time of the fire versus the value in its damaged state. Id. at 838-41. OLIVER, STOEV£R, BARR G VOSE Memo re Reconstruction of Nonconforming Buildings Partially Destroyed September 18, 1991 Page 4. The wrong way to compare would be to assess the cost of repair of the building versus its assessed value before. For example, if the cost to repair a building that had previously been valued at $400 is $300, yet the value of the building as damaged is $200, it is still the owner's choice to rebuild it as a nonconforming structure. Often times the repair costs are high, but if the building's assessed value is still greater than or equal to 50 percent of its original value, it is the owner's option to continue to own and operate the structure as a nonconforming building. This ambiguity in the code should be clarified and Section 13-6 revised accordingly. By way of this memorandum, we have discussed the legal application of Section 13-6 of the Hermosa Zoning Code to certain hypothetical situations. However, various practical aspects cross into this legal application, including property insurance, covenants, conditions, restrictions, and condo ownership association by-laws, along with issue of damage affecting the entire structure versus individual units. Where unique circumstances exist, they may be best addressed by the variance procedure or by subsequent amendment to the City Code. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Charles Vose, City Attorney FROM: William Grove, Building & Safety Director RE: Reconstruction of nonconforming building partially destroyed (Section 13-6, Appendix A, H.B.M.C.) DATE: April 30, 1991 Pursuant to administrative memorandum "L-1", it is requested that you render a legal opinion as to the applicability of the referenced section to condominium developments. In the past several years, due to density reduction ordinances and rezoning, numerous condominium developments have been rendered nonconforming as to use. A site which would support a five unit condominium project ten years ago might only be large enough for a two unit condominium today. If a five unit apartment building is destroyed and the owner can only rebuild a duplex he or she is not deprived of a reasonable use of the property. If a five unit condominium building is destroyed and the five separate owners can only rebuild a two unit condominium it would seem that an argument could be made that those owners (at least three of them) are being denied a reasonable use of their property. It appears that lenders who are aware of the situation are reluctant to loan on condominiums that are affected due to lack of potential security. If it is your opinion that the referenced section is applicable to condominium projects we will continue answering inquiries in that manner. If it is your opinion that the referenced section is not applicable to condominium projects then it should be amended to so indicate. It will be appreciated if this opinion is available by May 30, 1991. Concur: Wi 1I am Grove, Building & Safety Director Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager § 13-6 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE City of Hermosa Beach. (Ord. No. 86-865, § 1, 12-16-86; Ord. No. 89-1008, § 6, 9-26-89) Sec. 13-6. Reconstruction of nonconforming building par- tially destroyed. A nonconforming building destroyed to the extent of not more than fifty (50) percent of its reasonable replacement value at the time of its destruction by fire, explosion or other casualty or Act of God, or the public enemy, may be restored and the occupancy or use of such building or part thereof which existed at the time of such partial destruction may be continued subject to all other provisions of this article. The International Conference of Building Officials data shall be used in computing value. (Ord. No. 89-1008, § 8, 9-26-89) -=-Sec. 13-7. Conforming use of a nonconforming structure. i-- Intent and purpose of this section is to allow remodeling and expansion to nonconforming residential structures in sound con- dition in a manner that does not ultimately result in significant removal of existing structures. Where a structure is significantly damaged by dry rot, termites, or similar damage and removal of significant portions of the structure is necessary or recommended, this ordinance does not apply and expansion and/or remodeling is prohibited. All nonconforming structures shall require a termite and dry rot inspection by a bona fide company, to determine the amount of structural removal, if any, that will be necessary be- cause of damage. Expansion of existing nonconforming manufacturing or com- mercial structures shall be prohibited. (a) The following portions of the existing nonconforming struc- ture may be removed: (1) When adding additional stories, portions of the roof as necessary may be removed. (2) When adding to any side of a structure, walls may be removed to enlarge existing rooms, and/or to provide interior access as necessary for logical expansion of the existing structure. A maximum combination of thirty (30) percent of the existing lineal feet of exterior walls Supp. No. 12-89 September 18, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 24, 1991 RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE DISPOSITION OF FORFEITED PROPERTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 11473.3 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council authorize staff to give a forfeited cellular telephone to the Beach Cities Coalition for Alcohol and Drug Free Youth. BACKGROUND : At the regular City Council meeting of May 10, 1988, Council approved the procedures for handling assets which are seized and forfeited by the Police Department during narcotics investigations. These procedures call for the disposition of forfeited property to be approved by City Council. ANALXSIS: Recently, several cellular telephones were forfeited to the Hermosa Beach Police Department. Some have been placed into use for the Police operations. One, a Novatel cellular telephone #14200661127 is not needed by our department. Staff members of the Beach Cities Coalition for Alcohol and Drug Free Youth have a need for the use of a mobile cellular telephone in their operations. The Coalition is very active in programs aimed at drug and alcohol abuse prevention by the young people in our community. Hermosa Beach Police Department is the recepient of funds obtained via grants through efforts of the Coalition. These funds are used to provide funding for our DARE programs in the local schools. Staff recommends that the phone be given to the Coalition. Transfer to the Coalition is allowable under the state guidelines and will assist in furtherance of our working relationship and support of the Coalition, Concur: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Respectfully S • 'tted, Steve Wisniewski Director of Public Safety to RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1!0i CITY MGR. nr"rE Office of The Mayor and City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 John and Barbara Sabo 447 Herondo Street, #305 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 September 3, 1991 Re: Installation of sidewalk Agenda item for next City Council meeting Dear Mayor and City Council Members: As the City nears the completion of the acquisition of the South School site, we feel it is a good time to request that City Council take steps to complete the sidewalk fronting this property and the adjoining Body Glove parking lot. Currently, a simple dirt path terminates at the heavy gravel parking lot of Body Glove, this parking lot extending all the way to the curb along Valley Drive. For years now pedestrians using Valley Drive between 2nd and 6th Streets have had to contend with this unimproved walkway. Daily we see mothers with strollers, children on tricycles and the elderly or those unsteady on their feet, taking to the street in order to make it past this stretch of "non -sidewalk." On behalf of all the residents of South Hermosa who value the aesthetics and conveniences of our wonderful town, we strongly urge you to act in this matter as soon as possible. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, John ,and Barbara Sabo 213/372-8259 Attachment 4'a To Re Date . Hermosa Beach City Council City Improvement/Sidewalks August 27, 1991 We, the undersigned, petition The City Council of Hermosa Beach to undertake the installation of a sidewalk along Valley Drive, in front of the South School site property and the Bodyglove factory parking lot. Name Address V4/7 'kLkLei6 #36s7' 1;))4/7 447 /7,0,0-5,(d 57 7 ge_iLfzt‘Lo 5,47�c q7 /-/�0,4cSr # ,)63 nta5The /'v 05j 1'7 6,r.00ro ))-k-c 1 -f (442}.0 Z° (1 "I -t© o /fes 4 (f / Pred011c�,��,1 '1`9`7 Y -G, /O4/ - q 7 /-/34, 3o 4,47 hie -v.,10 ��7 /rztozJ/X6 #/o3 ' �. City of 2-lermosaTk_2eac =x. John and Margaret Sabo 447 Herondo Street, #305 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sabo: Civic Center, 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 September 11, 1991 We are in receipt of your letter to the City Council dated September 3, 1991, regarding installation of a sidewalk on Valley Drive in the area of South School. The suggested sidewalk is on -the City's designated safe route to school. Also, your request is similar to a request for 21st Street sidewalks that led to City construction of a sidewalk in that area. While there is only $20,000 budgeted this year for sidewalk repair, your suggestion has much merit. Per your request, your letter and this response will be placed on the September 24 City Council agenda. Thank you for your interest in improving our community. Sincerely yours, Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ld cc: City Council Public Works Department Hermosa Beach City Council Civic Center Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Good day, 1246 First St. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 September 10, 1991 RECEIVED SEP 1 6 lyvi CITY MGR. nrcipE Please consider this letter an official written communication from the public, to be included on the City Council meeting agenda. I wrote you August 28, 1991, to clarify what I considered a misstatement by the City Planning Director during the Council meeting of August 27 in regard to my letter of August 11 (item 4d on that agenda). I received a response from the Planning Director today (thank you); I was not satisfied with the letter, and the Planning Director was kind enough to suffer me in person for a few minutes before tonight's Council meeting. The response letter from the Planning Director, dated September 9, disagreed with my contentions in my August 28 letter. My letter objected to his contention that the City Traffic Engineer had responded to my concerns with explanations; the Planning Director's letter did not address that point. My letter objected to his contention that the City had a policy in the Circulation Element for effecting changes by having a citizen petition the neighbors and present such a petition to the Council. In response to that point, his letter cited Circulation Element Implementation Policy 2.1. In my conversation with him, the Planning Director indicated that the policy cited has indeed been implemented, but that no formal written procedures exist (instead being an interpretation by the City that the "request of organized neighborhood group" was, in effect, a reference to the aforementioned petition process). He referred me to Public Works. However, I checked with Public Works earlier today and was told by the Assistant Traffic Engineer that the policy had not been implemented, but was perhaps due to come under study in the near future, with funding for an experiment setting up two such neighborhood traffic control program groups. My own interpretation of Policy 2.1 is that the Circulation Element recommends that the City set up a neighborhood traffic control program (that is my interpretation of "Through vehicle traffic shall be reduced ...by implementation of a neighborhood traffic control program ...(which] would provide a mechanism for review of specific neighborhood traffic problems at the request of organized neighborhood groups."). According to my conversation with the Planning Director, there apparently is no formal "control program" as stated in the policy; the "request of organized 4b neighborhood groups" is to be interpreted as petitioning one's neighbors, and the City Council is apparently to be the only "control program." I appreciate the time the Planning Director took with me this evening, but I consider it unacceptable for a City policy to be based on interpretations that are nowhere codified (and thus subject to changing interpretations). would be satisfied if it were somewhere written that citizens, to bring to light and resolve traffic problems, must first petition their_ neighbors before the City Council will take any action. If this is to be the remedy for the City's nonfeasance in addressing the traffic on Prospect being inconsistent with the Circulation Element classification, so be it. And if citizens must first petition their neighbors before the City will take action to correct problems and inconsistencies in the Circulation Element, so be it. If that is the City's position, I would appreciate getting it in writing, explictly, please. I would have appreciated getting the information that the Planning Director gave me tonight much earlier (about needing to petition my neighbors before the City will consider any action). If the City had given me that information in response to my first letter (March 29, 1988), I would have taken steps to obtain such a petition. But, better late than never. The City Manager has left a message to try to arrange a meeting with me and City traffic personnel, and I will gratefully attempt to do this. I am eager to put an end to this correspondence; this is my 27th letter on this topic to the City in the last 3-1/2 years (during which time the only action taken by the City was to approve a Circulation Element that claims, among other things, that rush hour traffic on Prospect is almost entirely local traffic and not due to commuters, despite it being second only to PCH in traffic density and a ridiculous contention on its face, and despite that fact being pointed out to the City numerous times before that approval). I await the City's response that the petition process is as stated above, or the necessary clarifications. Thank you for your forbearance. I continue to wait for a definitive answer to my question: What is the City Council policy on traffic on south Prospect, to which the City Traffic Engineer alluded? (If it is indeed "it is as stated in the Circulation Element," I would like to know definitively that such is the case. Thank you.) Yours sincerel , 16 */4f1/411C David R. Suess cc: Michael Schubach, Planning Director t September 16, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council September 24, 1991 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION 90-1 LOCATION: 596 19TH STREET (CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND VALLEY DRIVE) APPLICANT/: GLENN DAVIS APPELLANT 596 19TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO ALLOW A 2 -LOT SUBDIVISION Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the request by sustaining the Planning Commission's decision and adopting the attached resolution. Background At their meeting of August 6, 1991, the Planning Commission denied this request by a 4-1 vote, based on the fact that the proposed lots would not be consistent with the prevailing lot sizes in the area. In a recent similar case, a 3 -lot subdivision proposed for 588 20th Street (a proposal to divide a 16,000 square foot lot into three 5,300 square foot lots) was denied by the City Council as an appeal of the Planning Commission's approval. The basis for the denial was also that the proposed lots were not consistent with prevailing lot sizes in the area. The applicant subsequently obtained approval for a two -lot subdivision of the property into two 8,000 square foot lots. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report and minutes for further background. Analysis Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report for the analysis. CONC _ Michael Schubach Planning Director c.-7#2/ Kevin B. Northc;Aft City Manager 1 Ken Robertson Associate Planner Attachments 1. Proposed resolution 2. P.C. Resolution 91-48 3. P.C. Minutes 4. P.C. staff report w/attachments. 2 a/pcsr596 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 '28 RESOLUTION 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DENY VESTING TENTATIVE MAP #22822 FOR A TWO -LOT SUBDIVISION AT 596 19TH STREET, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 9, BLOCK 71, SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on August 6, 1991, regarding an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a tentative map for a two -lot subdivision and made the following findings: A. The proposed subdivision would result in lots with smaller lot sizes than the prevailing lot sizes in the area which is inconsistent with the findings required by Section 29.5-8 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Section 1224(2)(d) of the Zoning Ordinance; B. The average lot size in the area; known as the "Valley" section, bound by Valley Drive on the east, Hermosa Valley School on the south, the sand hill on the west and 25th Street on the north; is over 5800 square feet, over 1400 square feet larger than the proposed lots; C. Dividing the subject lot as proposed would create lots that would be inconsistent with surrounding lot patterns. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby sustain the Planning Commission decision to deny a request for a vesting tentative map for a 2 -lot subdivision. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 24th day of September, 1991, by the following vote: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FOR2 \,k1) CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY p/pers596 3- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ( 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 91-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. 22882 FOR A TWO -LOT SUBDIVISION AT 596 19TH STREET, AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 9, BLOCK 71, SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH TRACT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 6, 1991, regarding a request for approval of a tentative map for a two -lot subdivision and made the following findings: A. The proposed subdivision would result in lots with smaller lot sizes than the prevailing lot sizes in the area which is inconsistent with the findings required by Section 29.5-8 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Section 1224(2)(d) of the Zoning Ordinance; B. The average lot size in the area; known as the "Valley" section, bound by Valley Drive on the east, Hermosa Valley School on the south, the sand hill on the west and 25th Street on the north; is over 5800 square feet, over 1400 square feet larger than the proposed lots; C. Dividing the subject lot as proposed would create lots that would be inconsistent with surrounding lot patterns. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California does hereby deny a request for a vesting tentative map for a 2 -lot subdivision. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Marks,Peirce,Stifano,Chmn.Ketz NOES: Comm.Di Monda ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 91-48 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California t their regular meeting of August 6, Christine Ketz, irperson Michael Schubach, Secretary" Date a/pers596 Comm. Marks and Mr. Schubach discussed the method resulting from the smog check. Public, Hearing opened by Mr. Steve Constantine, conditions of the permit container and 'a drawing for a brick wall he wished to build. comm. Peirce discussed the hours of operation with Mr. Schubach. Mr. Lee suggested Condition #5 be written, "...in the went the owner and adjacent property owner should have a termination of their signed agreement, the property owner's 'obligation is the provision / of an on-site trash Chmn. Ketz at 7:35 p.m. of exhaust dissipatio owner Constantine's Auto Detailing, ag Oed with and showed a letter agreement pertaining the trash container." Mr. Ted Dalton, 529 24th Place, property owner agreed to this condition, stating his current agreement 'ends July 1, 1,993. Mr. Lee questioned the agreement conditions, to which Mrs Dalton stated the two properties worked a trade; vehicle access through Mr.'\Dalton's' property and use of the trash container located on the adjacent property./ Public Hearing closed by Chmn. Ketz at ,7:37 p.m. Chmn. Ketz, Comm. Stifano and Mr./ Schubach discussed the stated hours of operation. MOTION by Comm. Stifano, no second, to remove Condition #2, 3' wall, with no replacement and Condition #6,'hours of operation restriction. Motion failed. MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Di Monda, to approve the Conditional Use Permit as presented with the modification to Condition #2, "a three-foot high decorative wall,'" and condition #5, "in the event '-the agreement is terminated, the property owner is obligated to supply an trash bin enclosure on site," y' AYES: Comms. Di Monda, Marks, Peirce and Chmn. Ketz NOES: ;'Comm. Stifano ABSTAIN: .'' None ABSENT: ;' / None SUB 91-1 -- A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #22882 FOR A TWO -LOT SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 596 19TH STREET. Recommended Action: To deny the request. Mr. Schubach said Staff recommends denial, stating the particulars of the applicant's request, comparing this request to similar previous ones, and commenting the street identified as 19th St. is a private 32' wide easement for four lots. Mr. Schubach explained Staff's concerns and processes in review of lot size area comparisons and subdivision requirements. Public Hearing was opened by churn. Ketz at 7:50 p.m, P.C.Minutes 8/6/91 Ms. Kathy May, applicant's representative, 2200 Pacific Coast Highway, stated they have concerns and disagree with Staff's report: (lj feel the lot and the division is unique, (2) property fronts on two streets, (3) very few area lots are eligible for subdivision, (4) there is a 50' lot frontage, (5) area lots are inconsistent in size, but with consistent frontage (6) five of six neighbors are in agreement with applicant's request, the concerns of the sixth neighbor can be addressed by maintaining the current pool and limiting the size of building construction, and (7) applicant has owned the lot since 1969. Mr. Glenn Davis, 596 19th Street, described the original building, the additions and repairs made, and the reasons for increasing the size of this home. He stated that selling a portion of his property would allow him to obtain the money needed to build this new house, then discussing the street widths and parking practices on the two street. Mr. Davis said he is agreeable to working with the Council and neighbors to assure conformance with all requirements. Mr. Larry Portiami, 590 19th Street, stated the proposed lots are not consistent with the area, expressing his concern the buildings will back up to his property. He purchased his property due to low density and the presence of back yards and does not want a building in his immediate view. Ms. Phyllis Horner, 1738 Valley Park, has no objection to Mr. Davis' request. Mr. Don Posluszny, 578 19th Street, has no objection to Mr. Davis' request. Mr. Jack Miller, 575 20th Street, stated the major issue is integrity of the neighborhood; if this application is approved, applications from others will follow. Me. Kathy May rebutted previous comments by stating review of plans display a greater set -back than is current if the request is granted, lot sizes are inconsistent, and the neighborhood integrity will be maintained as not many lots are eligible for subdivision according to her review. she stated conditions are acceptable to the applicant in the approval of this request. Comm. Marks, Ms. May and Mr. Davis discussed responsibility for. maintenance of the privately -owned street, with Mr. Davis stating his property does not compare to others within the area. Public Hearing was closed by Chmn. Ketz at 8:10 p.m. Comm. Peirce and Mr. Schubach discussed the lot dimensions and set -back allowances. Comm. Peirce asked if conditions of zoning matters can be applied to these lots. Mr. Lee responded this would be highly unusual, he has not seen this done before, but if the property owner signed a recordable covenant, the agreement would be enforceable. Mr. Lee asked that the matter be deferred until he investigated further. Comm. Peirce stated the ordinance was clear and the property does not meet the subdivision criteria. Comm. Di Monda stated the property seems to meet the criteria, but falls short meeting the last requirement; subdivision could prove interesting. MOTION by Comm. Peirce, seconded by Comm. Stifano, to adopt Resolution PC 91-48, denying the request for approval for vesting tentative parcel map two -lot subdivision at 596 19th Street. P.C.Minutes 8/6/91 AYES: Comms. Marks, Peirce, Stifano, Churn. Betz NOES: Comm. Di Monda ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CUP 90-13 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE AT AN EXISTIWG ESTABLISHMENT ALREADY LICENSED BY A.B.C., AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AT 2541 MANHATTAN AVENUE, MI -T -MART. Recommended Action: To approved said Conditional Use Permit and a.opt the Environmental Negative Declaration. • Mr. Schubach stated Environmental Review Committee recommended Negative Declaration, recommending Planning Commission to require the applicant owner to enclose the trash 'dumpster, repair the western parking area railing, reduce window signs to 20%`coverage and maintain abatement of graffiti. After-hours alcohol sale and sales to minors were noted, and recommendation of limiting hours. of sales from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. was made. The applicant has addressed all of the concerns except parking -lot striping. Staff recommends conditions stating the parking lot be re -striped, preliminary landscaping plans be submitted to Department for review and upon approval, landscaping to be implemented within 90 days, reserved parking signs be posted at subterranean parking, staffing be adequate, i' necessary, an/On-site officer will be at the owner's expense, and continued violations will,result in immediate revocation. Staff also recommends compliance with all Health Department regulations. Comms. Stifano, Peirce, Mr. schubach and Lee discussed citations issued to the applicant, with Mr. Lee asking for a deletion under Section 2, with a decision made upon any environmental impact rather than alcohol sales. Comm. Marks recommended that parking should be one hour'ra her than two (Section 3). Public Hearing was opened by Chmn.' Ketz at 8:26"p.m. Mr. Michael Toumalian, owner of Mi -T -Mart, built he store and has been only tenant since 1969, discussed the exterior and interior of his building, stated landscaping and conversion,of two subterranean parkin\ spaces is no problem. He challenged the ability of the police department to determine adequate staffing for his store, stating his problems have only ha pened during the last year and challenged the use of police cadets. He stated he has never had a problem with the Health Department. Mr. Toumajian does n agree with the underground parking, police being brought to his establishme at his expense and single cans sold must be put in see-through containers. He has no problem with employees being made aware of the Conditional Use Permit req rements. Public Hearing closed by churn. Ketz at 8:36 p.m. Comm. Stifano and Mr. schubach discussed comm. Stifano's questions and •easons for disagreement with several of the conditions specified: i.e. emplee's ability to make informed judgments, police protection at owner's expe e, hours of operation, subterranean parking, sign ordinance compliance and cle r bags for individual containers. P.C.Minutes 8/6/91 84 c/(ORO(/ND MATER/A[ July 31, 1991 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission August 6, 1991 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION 90-1 LOCATION: 596 19TH STREET (CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND VALLEY DRIVE) APPLICANT: GLENN DAVIS 596 19TH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REQUEST: TO ALLOW A 2 -LOT SUBDIVISION Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the request by adopting the attached resolution. Background PROJECT INFORMATION: Zoning: R-1 General Plan Designation: Low Density Existing Lot Size: 10,916 Sq. Ft., Gross 8,603 Square feet, Net Proposed Net Lot Sizes: 4,315 Sq. Ft. & 4,288 Sq. Proposed Lot Dimensions: Ft. 50' X 85' & 55' X 78' (excluding the private access easement) Environmental Determination: Categorically Exempt per Sec. 15315 of CEQA The subject lot is located at the corner of Valley Drive and 19th Street. The street identified as 19th Street is actually a private 32 -foot wide easement for ingress and egress for the four lots which extend west from Valley Drive along the private street. In a similar recent case, a 3 -lot subdivision proposed for 588 20th Street -- a proposal to divide a 16,000 square foot lot into three 5,300 square foot lots -- was denied by the City Council as an appeal of the Planning Commission's approval. The basis for the denial was that the proposed lots were not consistent with - 8 - preavailing lot sizes in the area. The applicant subsequently obtained approval for a two -lot subdivision of 8,000 square foot lots. Analysis The applicant is requesting to subdivide the existing lot into two lots which result in "buildable" net lot areas of 4,288 square feet and 4,315 square feet with widths of 50 and 55 feet. "Buildable" is used in this case because the northerly most lot would actually be 6,628 square feet, with a 2,313 square foot area in the private access easement, which is currently a privately maintained street. The proposed lots would conform to basic zoning and subdivision minimum requirements as they front on a public street (Valley Drive), exceed the minimum width of 40 feet, and exceed the minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet. However, the Planning Commission must also make findings, pursuant to Section 29.5-8 of the Subdivision ordinance, that the "size of the proposed lots is not smaller than the prevailing lot size in the area in which they are located." Staff previously calculated the average lot sizes for the surrouning R-1 zoned area when reviewing a proposed 3 -lot subdivision for 588 20th Street. For the area generally bounded by Valley Drive on the east, Hermosa Valley school on the south, the sand hill on the west, and 25th Street on the north the average lot size is 5,860 square feet. In a closer vicinity, between 18th and 21st Street, the average lot size is approximately 6,077 square feet. (See the attached exhibits A and B). Along the private street, 19th Street, the other three lots average 7,061 square feet of net "buildable" ,area, with lot widths of 67 feet, and along 18th Street immediately north of the subject lot, the 6 lots average 5,113 square feet with lot widths of 48.5 feet. In staff's judgement the proposed lots are clearly not consistent with the prevailing lot size of lots in the area, if "lot size" is considered to be the total lot area. The applicant's claim, however, are that the proposed lots are consistent with prevailing lot sizes in the area because of the proposed lot widths of 50 to 55 feet. Thus it is their contention that these sufficient widths make their case different than the case at 588 20th Street in which the proposed lots were only 40 feet wide. Although it is true that the lot widths are compatible with surrounding lot widths, the depths of the proposed lots are only 85 feet and 78 feet, significantly less than the typical lot in the area which ranges from 103 feet to 130 feet. Staff believes that lot width is only one of the many - - - components that make up "lot size", with the primary being total lot area, and secondarily the lot dimension and shape. Another concern of staff is that if the lots are subdivided as proposed an additional curb cut would have to be placed on Valley Drive to provide access to the southerly l,.ot. CONCUR: / J Michael`Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Site Map 3. Exhibits A & B 4. Photographs 5. Application and signatures submitted from neighbors 6. Public Correspondence , 7. Public Notice Affidavit en R.•ertssn Associate Planner a/pcsr2467 0 4183 1 2 1 SCALE 1' = 60' ( N 77°101. • 40 r2075 .1 h 2Z 1B 1 z9 O 1 1� 9 450•°• 6 7 A. 40 TRACT NO. 15546 M. .334-34 CGDE 4340 FO ?REV. /.SS/AT. SEE: 15 9 —43 1 SECOND ADDITION TO HERMOSA BEACH M.B. 3-11-12 ref /, a As COUNTY 4F Associ1mD FROCESSORS 2200 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 200 • Hermosa Beach, California 90254 • (213) 376-0508 • September 19, 1991 Mayor Kathleen Midstokke City Council Members CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 SEP 1 9gpl RE: Appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission to deny our' request for a 2 lot subdivision (PM 22882) Dear Mayor Midstokke and City Council Members: The following are our arguments for appeal. The crux of our appeal is two fold. First, that the size of the proposed lots is NOT smaller than the prevailing lot size when all R-1 lots within our 300 foot radius are surveyed. Second, that the City by conditioning the approval of this subdivision, as shown below, will have the opportunity to regulate, control and limit the development on these lots. 1. Does the subdivision conform to the Hermosa Beach Subdivision Code (Section 29.5-8)? Can findings be made for approval? YES. This section of the Code (Exhibit A) list the required findings for approval. There are seven. The subsection in question reads "The size of the proposed lots is not smaller than the prevailing lot size in the area in which they are located." Staff has taken the position that, based on the survey done for the Betty Ryan lot split, our proposed lots do not conform with the prevailing lot size. We feel the survey should be done using all R-1 lots within the 300 foot radius used by the City as a standard for notification. A copy of this radius is attached as Exhibit "B". The Ryan survey incompasses many more lots to the north and while it was appropriate for that case, it is not appropriate for our case. Using the 300 foot radius as a definition of the "area in which they are located" is fair and consistant. I understand staff's reluctance to include properties east of Valley and Ardmour, but you can't just survey in the location which best proves your point. You have to have a standard, and the City has already established a 300 foot standard for noticing. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Page 2 The results of a 300 foot radius survey of R-1 lots are as follows: There are 60 (R-1) lots within this radius area, excluding the subject property. 28 of these are 4,920 sq.ft. or less. 14 of these are 5,000 to 5,745 sq.ft. 12 of these are 6,050 to 6,970 sq.ft. 4 of these are 7,061 to 7,300 sq.ft. 2 of these are over 8,000 sq.ft. In addition to the above, there are two lots on this short private street in the first catagory (4,000 sq.ft. range), eight within the block ,and 20 lots within the radius which are smaller than our proposed lot size. It is clear that all of the findings for approval can be made and that this subdivision will NOT create lots smaller than the prevailing lot size in the area in which they are located. 2. Can findings be made for denial pursuant to Section 29.5-9? NO. None of the seven findings for denial can be made in this case. There isn't even mention of "lot size". There is, however, considerable mention of "consistency" and "suitability". These are concerns which can be mitigated by conditions. These are issues which can be dealt with more fully by a subdivision approval than by no approval at all. 3. A great deal of credit was given to neighborhood opinion on Betty Ryan's lot split and we feel equal credit should be given to the SUPPORT of the neighbors in this application. A copy of the signatures of neighbors supporting Mr. Davis and a separate support letter is attached at Exhibit "C". Of the 8 neighbors who are either adjacent to the Davis' property or who share the private street, only 1 neighbor opposes the application and 1 is concerned about the building size. Of the entire 300 foot radius mailing, only 2 letters in opposition were received. Six neighbors have openly and in writing supported the subdivision. The concerns in Mr. Constant's letter are -reasonable and can be met as shown below. Page 3 The concerns of Mr. Fordiani, adjacent and to the --west, can also be met as shown below, but his comparison of the potential density of this subdivision to that of the "sand section" is very exaggerated. His previous home at 7th and Hermosa Ave. was in a high density R-3 zoned section of town with a minimum lot area per unit of 1,320 sq.ft. Comparing that to a 4,300 sq.ft. single family lot is going a bit far. However, we do understand his concerns. If we provide a greater set back at his property line (double what is required), agree to limit the square footage of the homes by reducing lot coverage and agree to retain or replace any established trees, the overall impact will be much less than allowing one VERY large home on this lot with only a 5 foot set back required on his property line. 4. Staff and Mr. Fordiani mentioned concern over a curb cut on Valley: If only one new home were built on this site, the new home could also have a curb cut on Valley. 5. At the Planning Commission hearing the City Attorney was asked if the approval could be conditioned with some restrictions on the building size, increased set -backs, etc. The City Attorney asked for the opportunity to look into the enforceability of a recorded document containing building restricitons. One Commissioner then said he doubted it could not be done and that was the end of the discussion. We were not given the opportunity to disuss conditions or the manner in which they could be enforced. Enclosed as Exhibit "D" is a sample of a type of restriction called a "Covenant and Agreement" which is used by the City of Los Angeles for every subdivision they approve. The City of Carson records the entire conditions of approval for any subdivision. The City of Hermosa Beach is accustomed to conditions imposed on condominium developments. This is a similar discretionary action and can be permanently conditioned with building standards which would run with the land regardless of the ownership. We ask that the City Attorney review this document or consider the recording of the conditions of approval in some other manner to permit the restrictions we are willing to impose. The following are restrictions on the development of this property which are acceptable and will mitigate the impact of development on the surrounding neighbors: - provide 'a 10 foot set back on the westerly property line of both lots 1 and 2. - restrict the lot coverage to 65% of the buildable lot area after set backs are deducted. _3_ Page 4 - retain all existing established trees or replace on a 1 to 1 ratio with 24" box specimen trees, to be approved by the Planning Department. The following is an illustration of the effect of these conditions: Subject property without subdivision and using existing R-1 requirements for development: Single home - Front set back: Side set backs: Rear set back: 10 feet 5 feet 5 feet Allowable lot coverage: 5,592 sq.ft. Subject property subdivided into 2 lots with restricitons: Lot 1 Lot 2 Front set back: Side set backs: Rear set back: 8 1/2 feet 5 feet 10 feet Restricted lot coverage: 1,748 sq.ft. Front set back: Side set backs: Rear set back: 8 feet 5 feet 10 feet Restricted lot coverage: 1,768 sq.ft. The City has discovered that one of the best ways of reducing building size and bulk is to restrict the allowable lot coverage. By restricting this further on these two lots to 65% of the lot area after the set backs are subtracted, the potential for one or two large homes is gone and the consistency and suitability of these homes with the neighborhood is retained. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please contact me if you have any quesitons regarding this evidence or any of the enclosures. Catherine May cc: Michael Schubach w/encl. Ken Robertson w/encl. Casey Vose w/encl.- 4 § 29.5-8 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 29.5-8 ignate the boundaries of the Lots or parcels of land to be sold or separated in ownership. (2) Sale or separation of lots or parcels. Where lots or parcels of land are sold or otherwise separated in ownership, no dwelling unit or lot or parcel of land for a building shall be sold or encumbered separately from an undivided interest in the open space and the area designated as common vehicular and pedestrian access appurtenant to such dwell- ing unit or lot or parcel of land. Such undivided interest nclude either an undivided interest in the open space •ea designated as common vehicular access or a share corporation or voting membership in an association g the open space and area designated as common ilar and pedestrian access. ract map. The title page of the final recorded tract s, as the case may be, shall contain the following !rtaining to the sale or separation of lots upon which uildings or dwellings are to be developed: this Tract Map upon which residential dwellings or are to be built, constructed, developed or otherwise shall be contracted to sell, sold, granted, deeded, title transferred or otherwise separated in owner- iding subsequent heirs and owners in interest, or :d separately from an individual interest in lots ap- thereto so designated on this Tract Map for vehicu- 3destrian access, open space, and any other areas nt thereto." _-835, 5-29-86) } i q i lixa Sec. 29.5-8. Requirements for approval of subdivision map. The planning commission shall find that: (a) The proposed subdivision would not create lots smaller than a forty -foot width and having less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. (b) The proposed Lots, after being divided, front on public streets and do not front on any alleys. Supp. No. 9-86 342.40.2 § 29.5-9 SUBDIVISION OF LAND k 29.5-9 (c) The proposed subdivision will in no way be detrimen- tal to the surrounding lot pattern or tend to reduce property values in the surrounding area. (d) The size of the proposed lots is not smaller than the prevailing lot size in the area in which they are located. (e) The granting of the subdivision would result in the creation of lots that would be of a size and configuration which would be in keeping with the• standards of development specified by the zoning ordinance for the land use zone in which it is located. (f) The creation of the proposed lots would be in conformity with the intent and purpose of the comprehensive general plan for the City of Hermosa Beach. (g) The tentative subdivision map complies with the requirements for approval set forth in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California. (Ord. No. N.S. 485, .§ 1, 4-16-74) Sec. 29.5-9. Grounds for denial of approval of sub- division map. The planning commission or the city council shall deny approval of a tentative or final subdivision map if it makes any of the following findings: (a) That the proposed map is not consistent with the applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environ - Supp. No. 12-79 342.41 § 29.5-10 HERMOSA BEACH CITY CODE § 29.5-11 mental damage or substantially and avoidably injure - fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvement is likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the city council may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to the city council or planning commission to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. (Ord. No. N.S. 485, § 1, 4-16-74) Sec. 29.5-10. Reserved. § 29.5-12 Sec. 29.5- (a) Gene the city's ( established (b) TentL twenty-five applicant tentative n N.S. 485, § Sec. 29.5-1 Sec. 29.5-11. Subdivision agreements and bonds; im- provement security. To assure the completion of required improvements after recordation of a final map, the city engineer shall require the submission of bonds sufficient to accomplish subject improvements. Should the subdivider fail to complete the required improvements within a reasonable time or in accordance with a written subdivision agreement signed by the subdivider and the city clerk, the city engineer shall cause said bonds to be forfeited and the improvements completed. (Ord. No. N.S. 485, § 1, 4-16-74) (a) Autho granted by 1 visions of t empted fron Code Sectiol (b) Requi: map or par shall dedica both, at th( approval of 1 or combinai recreational thousand (1, shall be imr (c) Stand( (1) Perso availi (2) If a fe fee sl- value be re( deter: ance • Supp. No. 12-79 342.42 nr Supp: No. 9-86 rra +;� , '.,� 1 ; p- r . I , • ',1-/�� '• . .i`ce. ;' (Oa `� �i }� Y i J b y,y jr•. 4 11 4„r k,i ka 11 -77-11V C I• • :l r • t\k:111:1V1.1 • ' I a • 4 ,ig„ IT q I tixj J r rJ 9 44, 7,7 oat; .' bI . Co r;71117 7 /!7,4,. 1 j <• . 1101 ,. IJ1'af 71 is v 141-//.. , i•+ CO2g fiN Iowa'. 1? • TOV s/ • "iri"-,;„ e' - • ?t 4_3=_ft �•l•' c•-• o -r.u�-�-v.-..yam 1 IL Glenn and Susan Davis 596 19th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213) 379-4518 Planning Department CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH We, the undersigned neighbors of Glenn and Susan Davis, have seen a copy of the parcel map to split their lot at 596 19th Street into two lots. We understand that the private street will not be impacted by this lot split as one lot will have a driveway off the private street, as it does now, and one lot will have a driveway off Valley Drive. We understand both of the new lots will have more than the minimum lot size of 4,000 sq.ft. Therefore, we have no objection to their request. O"1\LC\ name address ional comments ame address additional coi ents `_ 111 name (P f71 I� 54• , ()C)1E41, address additional comme S ?5 address addi iona co ents 1 address additional comments name) address additional comm( Exhibit "C" • 591 18th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 September 15, 1991 To Whom It May Concern: As resident and owner of 591 18th Street, I have no objections to the proposed two -lot subdivision, presently under reconsideration at 596 19th Street. This property on 19th Street runs immediately behind my property. Thank you for your attention and consideration. William R. Buck (213)376-9202 Exhibit "C" RECORDING REQUESTED BY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER COVENANT AND AGREEMENT The undersigned hereby certify that I am (we are) the owners of the hereinafter legally described real property located in the City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California: (Legal Description) as filed in Book , Page(s) , as per map(s) recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, which property is located and commonly known as: (Street Address) That in consideration of the approval of Parcel Map No. by the Advisory Agency, I (we) do hereby promise, covenant and agree to and with said City of Hermosa Beach and the Advisory Agency that: This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and be binding upon any future owners, encumbrancers, their successors, heirs or assigns and shall continue in effect unless otherwise released by authority of the Advisory Agency of the City of Hermosa Beach. Dated this day of , 199 . (Signature) (Signature) (Signature) Approved for recording by Date: (Planning Director) (Owners signature is notarized. —10- Exhibit "DVS September 16, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council of September 24, 1991 RECOMMENDATION TO CONTRACT WITH KENNETH A. MEERSAND AS' CITY PROSECUTOR RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council: 1) Appoint Kenneth A. Meersand as the City Prosecutor effective September 25, 1991; 2) Approve the attached Agreement for Services; and 3) Authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement. BACKGROUND: Following the retirement of long time City Prosecutor, John Barry, City Council instructed staff to recruit for a new City Prosecutor at the regular Council meeting of June 12, 1990. Requests for proposals were posted on the City bulletin board on July 18, 1990 and an advertisement for the position was placed in the Daily Journal, a legal newspaper of general circulation to attorneys, to run from - July 19 to July 27, 1990. Eight proposals were received by the deadline of August 1, 1990. Staff reviewed all of the proposals to select the qualified candidates. Five of the candidates submitted complete proposals and were scheduled for an interview. Three of the candidates did not submit a complete proposal and were rejected. 1 An interview board, consisting of the Director of Public Safety, the Building and Safety Director, and the Personnel Director interviewed each of the five candidates and rated them on their qualifications and experience as follows: 1) David G. Coffey 2) Janet Bogigian 3) Martin Mayer (a firm) 4) Kenneth Meersand 5) Steven Berman At the regular City Council meeting of August 28, 1990, Council appointed David G. Coffey as the City Prosecutor. From the time of his appointment Mr. Coffey performed well. In early April some of his other business interests began causing some problems and conflicts with his duties as City Prosecutor. The problems and conflicts were not satisfactorily corrected and at the regular Council meeting of July 23, 1991 Mr. Coffey's contract for services was terminated. Council authorized staff to contract with a qualified attorney to act as City Prosecutor on an interim basis, and instructed staff to contact the top three candidates for the position to obtain updated proposals if they were still interested and. to return to Council with a recommendation for permanent City Prosector. One of the candidates, Kenneth Meersand, wasretained to handle the duties of City Prosecutor on an interim basis. Mr. Meersand was selected because he was familiar with the City's cases and procedure as he had been retained by Mr. Coffey to fill in and cover the Hermosa cases in Mr. Coffey's absence. ANALYSIS: The three top candidates were contacted to determine if they were still interested in the permanent position of City Prosecutor. All three 2 indicated interest and submitted updated proposals for service as follows. Hourly Rate Monthly Retainer/hours Kenneth A. Meersand $75.00 $5,600/80 Janet Bogigian $75.00 $6,800/96 Martin Mayer (firm) $110.00 Hourly basis only Councilmember Wiemans reviewed the proposals with staff and it was decided to interview the two candidates with the least expensive proposals, Mr: Meersand . and Ms. Bogigian. On September 12, 1991 Councilmember Wiemans, Director Wisniewski, and Commander Mebius of the Investigations Unit conducted interviews with the two candidates. Both candidates have excellent qualifications and it was felt that either would provide the City with the services desired. Based on the fact that Kenneth Meersand was already involved with handling the City's prosecution of cases, that he has been involved in the same duties with the Cities of Torrance and Redondo Beach for the last two years, that he was highly recommended by all of the South Bay Judges and the Prosecutors of Torrance and Redondo Beach, and that he has offices located in the vicinity of City Hall, he was selected as the candidate to be recommended. Concur: ectfully S b ' itted, Kevin B. Northcraft, ' Steve S. Wisniewski, City Manager William Grove, Director of Building and Safety 3 Director of Public Safety AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES WITH Kenneth A. Meersand Attorney at Law THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 25th day of September, 1991, by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and Kenneth A. Meersand, (hereinafter referred to as "Prosecutor"). WHEREAS, the City desires to engage Prosecutor to render legal services, advice, and assistance in connection with City's enforcement activities. NOW ,'THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICE Reporting to and under the general direction of the Director of Public-, Safety, the City Prosecutor is responsible for the prosecution of violations of the municipal code and misdemeanor and infraction violations of the Penal Code for the City. Prosecutor agrees to render legal services to the City as City Prosecutor pursuant to the terms herein and when and as required by the City Council, the City Manager, or the Director of Public Safety. For the monthly retainer specified herein, Prosecutor will provide up to 80 hours of legal services per month which may include, but shall not be limited to: *Meeting with the various departments and staff entrusted with the enforcement of the- various legal codes concerning violations, enforcement, and prosecutions during regular office hours each week; *Review of all misdemeanor, infraction, and municipal code violations; *Filing and/or coordinating filing of all criminal complaints(Infraction and Misdemenor); *Complete all legal procedures for prosecution through the municipal court system making all court appearances in connection with prosecutions including arraignment, pretrial appearances, motions, and trials (jury and court); 1 *Representing the City in traffic court as required; *Filing answers and assisting the departments with Pitchess and discovery motions, making court appearances and attending in camera hearings as needed; *Assisting with legal filings for asset forfeitures in connection with illegal narcotics activity; *Preparing necessary documents to include motions and orders in conjunction with evidence and seized property releases and destruction, making court appearances as necessary; *Developing and presenting in-service training programs and legal updates to personnel involved in the enforcement of the various codes and laws as needed; *Providing legal support and advice on sensitive investigaions; *Developing and maintaining programs and procedures to effectively track prosecutions and report statistical data on case loads and case dispositions on a monthly basis to the Director of Public Safety; *Being available on an on call basis to respond to crime scene locations and to assist the departments in the preparation and attainment. of search warrants, arrest warrants, bail deviations and other legal matters as needed. 2. COMPENSATION For the services specified in this Agreement, the City shall pay Prosecutor a monthly retainer in the amount of $5,600. For all legal services in excess of 80 hours per month, Prosecutor shall be compensated for services rendered under this Agreement at the hourly rate of $75.00. City shall reimburse Prosecutor for reasonable expenses incurred in an amount equal to actual out-of-pocket costs such as reproduction, messenger services, filing costs, witness fees, jury fees, court reporter fees, and similar costs relating to prosecution of City cases. All expenses shall be submitted with appropriate receipts. Prosecutor shall not be reimbursed for secretarial or typist services or normal office operating expenses. 2 Fees listed herein shall be subject to review and adjustment during the regular City budget processes each year. 3. METHOD OF PAYMENT Within ten (10) days after the first of each calendar month, Prosecutor shall submit a statement to the City, attention : Director of Public Safety, containing a breakdown of services performed during the preceeding month specifying the services performed by dates and number of hours, and itemization of other expenses related thereto. Prosecutor agrees to modify and/or add to billing statement at City's request to show cumulative totals and improve clarity. 4. STATUS OF CITY PROSECUTOR The City Prosecutor is an independent contractor and not an officer, .administrator, or employee of the City. The City shall not be liable, responsible, or otherwise answer for any claims for damages or other relief against Prosecutor based on any undertaking not authorized or directed by the City. 5. INSURANCE REQUIRED Malpractice: The City Prosecutor shall carry malpractice insurance covering errors and ommissions in an amount of not less than $300,000. The City Prosecutor shall provide the City with a certificate verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the City. Such policy shall require 30 days notice to the City in writing prior to cancellation, termination, or expiration of any kind. Worker's Compensation: In accordance with State Compensation Laws, the City Prosecutor shall carry Worker's Compensation insurance for any persons employed in the performance of services as set forth herein. The City Prosecutor shall provide the City with a certificate verfying such coverage. Such policy shall require 30 days notice to the City in writing prior to cancellation, termination, or expiration of any kind. 3 General Liability: The City Prosecutor shall carry personal injury and liability coverage with single limit liability in an amount of not less than $1 million, naming the City, it's officers and employees as additional insureds. The City Prosecutor shall provide the City with a certificate verifying such coverage or endorsement acceptable to the City. Such policy shall require 30 days notice to the City in writing prior to cancellation, termination, or expiration of any kind. 6. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Prosecutor shall serve at the pleasure of the City and this Agreement may be terminated by either party on ninety (90) days written notice to: the other, the effective date of cancellation being the 90th day of said written notice without further action by either party. Notice shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or as of the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: CITY: Director of Public Safety City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 PROSECUTOR: 7. SEVERABILITY Kenneth A. Meersand 555 Pier Avenue, Suite #4 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 If any provision or portion of this agreement is held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable, then the remainder of this agreement or portions thereof shall be deemed severable, shall not be affected, and shall remain in full force and effect. 4 W L 15:37 ID:CITY HERIIOSR REACH TEL ND:213-372-6106 ti376 P06 The text herein shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The City and Prosecutor have executed this Agreement asof the date first hereinabove set forth. airy O IMIGIaSA BEACii CITY PROSECUTOR Kohlestilkedstokkeibiayor Kenneth A. Moorland Append silo 5 Mayor and Members September 17, 1991 City Council Meeting of the City Council September 24, 1991 CONCEPTUAL AWARD OF AGREEMENT FOR RECORDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Conceptually approve the selection of Susan Bigelow Associates for Records Management consultant services for the development and implementation of a citywide program; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to negotiate with the consultant on ways to reduce the cost without adversely affecting the quality or success of the program, and to work out details of the agreement, with an award of agreement to be presented` for Council approval at the meeting of October 8, and the start of the project to begin about one month later, or as quickly as possible after the November 5 election. The timing of this program is ideal, since it can be tied into the proposed new4computer system, and since the Deputy City Clerk position has been filled. Scheduling the start of the project after the November 5 election would also enable the Clerk's office to get beyond the time-consuming duties of the election process and focus on the major undertaking of a records management program. Background This item was continued from the meeting of July 9 to enable the City Clerk to work with the City Manager on the development of a total plan for the project that would include a more accurate assessment of the staff time required, to explore viable methods for reducing consultant cost on some phases of the project, to ensure conformance of the proposal with the RFP, and to meet with all department heads to discuss the project and verify management commitment, which is essential for the success of the program. Although the state -mandated duties and deadlines associated with the upcoming election forced the Clerk's office to focus on those demands, thus delaying progress on the records program (which is a priority item), the City Clerk did attend two department head staff meetings (July 15 and September 9), and conducted a meeting on September 10 with department heads and their record coordinators (the staff member designated by each department head to participate in this team effort) to discuss the project and 1 obtain input from the departments. Suggestions involving the staff work effort include devoting time to the project on Fridays since City Hall is closed and it would be' less disruptive to the departments, as well as the possible use of the Senior Aid Program, JTPA, and/or community volunteers for; some tasks. Management commitment to the project has been received from all departments. It is difficult to accurately assess the amount of staff time that will be required, and that time will obviously vary from department to department, depending on the records involved. It is realistic to assume a longer time for Finance records (440 boxes/file drawers reported in March 1991) than for Personnel records (43 boxes/file drawers reported in March 1991). Please note that the amount of Finance records has increased by 17 boxes over the volume reported six months ago. The volume of Clerk's records has increased by nine boxes (237 reported in March 1991). Analysis The selection process included reviewing the proposals to determine the top three consultants; then checking references, conducting interviews, and visiting cities that have used the services of each of those consultants to develop and implement their records management program. While all of the top three firms (Susan Bigelow Associates, Kattlove and Associates, and Savage Information Services) have experience in records management programs for local governments and have received good references which have been verified, the interviewing committee (composed of the City Clerk, Computer System Manager Marguerite Sturges, and Alice Muller, Deputy City Clerk/Records Manager for the City of Redondo Beach) were particularly impressed with the knowledge, ability and experience of Susan Bigelow, and with the system and approach proposed by her firm. She came to the interview well prepared, presented a sample of the entire work product that the City would receive, and her responses to questions revealed a thorough understanding of City records and the scope of work. The functional filing system proposed by Susan Bigelow Associates is truly a unified system, with the same numbers assigned to similar records in each department throughout the City. Each department would have the same manual. While the fee submitted by Susan Bigelow for Phase 1 (City Clerk records) exceeds the fees proposed by the other consultants, her fee for Phase 2 (integrating the other departments into the system) is less. Her Phase 1 proposal of $42,500 includes not only a complete program for the City Clerk's office, but also the basic components for a citywide program, which would then require only specific information from the other departments to complete 2 and implement the program citywide. This approach to design a whole model (incorporating records that cities traditionally have rather than just Clerk records) avoids any duplication of effort and reduces consultant time and cost during Phase 2. Her cost to do just the City Clerk records would be $24,500, and the cost to do the other departments later would be $43,500, for a total of $68,000 (plus other expenses), which would exceed her original proposal for Phase 1 and Phase 2 of $58,500 (which includes other expenses) by more than $10,000. The proposal submitted by Kattlove and Associates is $19,975 for Phase 1 (this fee does not include the recommendation for $3,000 to hire temporary personnel) and an estimate of $25,000 to $45,000 for Phase 2, for a total cost of $44,975 to $64,975. The proposal submitted by Savage Information Services is $20,790 for Phase 1 and an estimate of $50,000 to $75,000 for Phase 2, for a total cost of $70,790 to $95,790. (Please refer to the fee comparison in the attached July 9, 1991 report.) It is important to note that, while cost is certainly a factor in evaluating a proposal, the award of a contract is not based on the lowest maximum fee proposed, but rather on a combination of many other factors as well (which were noted in the request for proposals), including an understanding of the work scope, quality of the proposal, references and similar projects performed for other governmental agencies, demonstrated professional skills and credentials, and approach to performing the records management program. This project is long overdue, and the need for professional help with the development and implementation of a records management program is essential. Elaine Doerfling,/ City6Clerk Concur: Not available for signature Marguerite Sturges Computer System Manager Concur: Noted for Fiscal Impact: Not available for signature Not available for signature Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Viki Copeland,Finance Director 3 Mayor and Members of the City Council July 1, 1991 City Council Meeting July 9, 1991 AWARD OF AGREEMENT FOR RECORDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Select Susan Bigelow Associates for Records Management Consultant services and award the attached agreement for a citywide program for a total amount not to exceed $58,500; 2. Reappropriate the unused $20,000 previously appropriated for this project in the FY 90-91 budget; 3. Appropriate an additional $38,500 from the unappropriated General Fund balance; and 4. Direct the City Clerk to work with the consultant on the details (i.e., schedule) of the agreement, pursuant to Council direction and subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and authorize the City Manager to execute said document upon its completion. Start of project is proposed to be September 1, 1991. This would be a joint client/consultant work effort and, assuming adequate staffing levels, the consultant estimates eighteen (18) months for completion of a citywide project (Phase 1 and Phase 2), with progress payments on a monthly basis. Actual expenditures would, therefore, be phased over two budget years. The consultant is agreeable to a 24 -month time frame if the City is concerned about providing adequate staffing levels for the duration of the project, which would phase a portion of the expenditures over into a third budget year (completion date of August 31, 1993). The timing of this program is ideal since it can be tied into the new computer system, which is also proposed to assist staff in being more productive, and since the Deputy City Clerk position will be filled prior to the start of the project. Background: The lack of a records management system has been a concern of prior city clerks for many years. The problem was not created by the current staff or the preceeding staff. It is the result of the accumulation of 84 years worth of records without having a uniform, systematic method of retaining those records in an organized fashion, with a tracking system to allow for rapid retrieval. The problem has merely compounded. The more records 1 we accumulate, the more unmanageable they become. The longer the solution is delayed, the larger the problem becomes, making the final resolution more costly and time-consuming. While there are obvious, direct costs associated with developing and implementing a records program, it is important to recognize the long-term costs of not having a program in place. Trying to find a document without a filing system is like trying to find a book in the library if there were no catelog system. The time spent searching for information, or looking from file to file to pull together all the pieces of a particular subject matter, is a significant waste of funds. And the amount of valuable space we are wasting to store unnecessary or duplicate records could be put to better use. A record is the memory of any organization and the only purpose of filing a document is to be able to retrieve it later when it is needed. It is now estimated that the average cost of each misfiled record is over $100. One lost record not only creates delays, it can often necessitate that the work be redone. A good system will save money through more efficient processing and management of information, and can save about 30 percent in staff time now needed to access and maintain the files. This would allow for more effective use of staff's time, which would assist in meeting Council's goal to improve the level of service to the citizens of our community without increasing staff. We also have an obligation to our citizenry to have our records in good order to avoid the potential for any legal problems, which could be far more costly than any amount of money that may be spent on a records management program. The assistance and guidance of a qualified consultant, expert in this field, is the most efficient and cost-effective way to develop and implement a comprehensive records program that meets the legal requirements of federal and state laws and accommodates both the existing and future needs of the City. A professional in this field has the training and experience needed to analyze the City's needs and develop and implement a program in a short amount of time, thus enabling the City to enjoy the cost benefits sooner. Lacking that expertise, an in-house program would be more costly and time-consuming, and may result in a number of costly errors, legal and otherwise. The need for records management, as well as the need for professional help in the development and implementation of a program, was recognized by Mayor Midstokke while she was City Clerk, and the current project was initiated during her term of office. At its 1989 goal -setting workshop, the City Council established as one of its goals the development of a Records Management System. Council appropriated $20,000 in the FY 89-90 City Clerk's budget and directed staff to proceed with the project. 2 At the meeting of April 24, 1990, the item was placed on hold pending the arrival of the General Services Director, who would be coordinating the computer work. At the time, there was also concern that the request was not timely with regard to the City Clerk's staffing. The approved money was reappropriated in the FY 90-91 budget. On March 12, 1991, the City Council approved the Request for Proposal for a consultant to prepare a Records Management System. A public notice soliciting proposals for consultant services was published in the Easy Reader on March 21 and March 28, 1991. In addition, 11 packets were mailed to consultants known to specialize in this field (see attached list). Also, a notice was sent to a firm providing project information services to a group of professional consultants, and a flyer was distributed by that firm to its clients. A pre -proposal conference to answer any questions of prospective firms was conducted on April 2, 1991 by the City Clerk and Computer System Manager Marguerite Sturges. Following the conference, a site tour was conducted by the City Clerk. Five proposals were received and opened on April 25, 1991, from the following: Susan Bigelow Associates, Gamlin Industries, Kattlove and Associates, Susie Kelly, and Savage Information Services. Analysis: The City Clerk reviewed all of the proposals to select the top three firms. This selection process was based on the consultants best meeting the criteria outlined in the Request for Proposal. The three top firms, Susan Bigelow Associates, Kattlove and Associates and Savage Information Services, were interviewed on May 28, 1991 by the City Clerk, Computer System Manager Marguerite Sturges, and Alice Muller, Deputy City Clerk/Records Manager for the City of Redondo Beach. The interviewing committee was particularly impressed with the knowledge, ability and experience of Susan Bigelow and with the system proposed by her firm. While all three of the firms have experience in records management programs for local governments, Susan Bigelow Associates offered far more references than did the other firms -- good references which have been verified. One of her references, the City of Escondido, received the President's Award of Excellence for its records management program from the City Clerks Association of California in 1988. In addition, while Susan Bigelow is proposed as project manager, all of the firm's associates have been professionally trained as city clerks. Susan Bigelow herself has completed the three-year Continuing Education for Public Officials (CEPO) Program and is a Certified Municipal Clerk. She is also a trainer/facilitator, having completed a 220 -hour training -of -trainers program, and is 3 an active member of the American Records Management Association (ARMA). Her local government experience as records management consultant is further enhanced by her staff background in a city clerk's office. Her records management experience began in 1976 while she was Assistant City Clerk for the City of Menlo Park, where she was the staff project manager for a citywide records management program, during which she coordinated training meetings, aided the consultant in developing a unified system for all departments, and served as the city's records manager upon project completion. While the fee submitted by Susan Bigelow for Phase 1 (City Clerk records) exceeds the fees proposed by the other consultants, her fee for Phase 2 (integrating the other departments into the system) is less (see attached fee schedules). Since the ultimate goal is for a citywide system, the combined fee submitted by Susan Bigelow Associates for both phases places her total cost for the overall program within the range or below the combined fee proposed by the other consultants. It is also important to note that her Phase 2 fee is firm, while the other consultants submitted only estimates for that phase. In addition, the functional filing system proposed by Susan Bigelow Associates is truly a unified system, with the same numbers assigned to similar records in each department throughout the City. Each of the consultants recommends the purchase of letter -size, shelf -type filing equipment during the implementation phase of the project, which can result in a 70% reduction of the floor space currently required to house records. None of the firms are affiliated with particular vendors, and any expense for filing equipment and other needed supplies (i.e., file folders, labels, etc.) are not included in the consultants' fees. Each of the consultants noted the impossibility of accurately estimating quantities of supplies until the program is underway and the records have been purged and segregated. The interviewing committee concurs that Susan Bigelow Associates is the firm that best meets the City's specifications. Alternatives: 1. Select Susan Bigelow Associates for Records Management Consultant services and award the attached agreement for Phase 1 (City Clerk's office) and all but the implementa- tion portion of Phase 2 (other departments) for a total amount not to exceed $52,000; reappropriate the unused $20,000 previously appropriated for this project in the FY 90-91 budget; appropriate an additional $32,000 from the unappropriated General Fund balance; and direct the City Clerk to work with the consultant on the details (i.e. schedule) of the agreement, pursuant to Council direction 4 and subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and authorize the City Manager to execute said document upon its completion. This alternative would include the inventory for the other departments and enable them to be included in the design phase of the project, but the implementation phase (actual conversion of files) would be done without the supervision of the consultant. The consultant indicated her portion of the project for this alternative could be accomplished in 12 months. The implementation would be done solely by staff. 2. Select Susan Bigelow Associates for Records Management Consultant services and award the attached agreement for Phase 1 only, for a total amount not to exceed $42,500; reappropriate the unused $20,000 previously appropriated for this project in the FY 90-91 budget; appropriate an additional $22,500 from the unappropriated General Fund balance; and direct the City Clerk to work with the consultant on the details (i.e., schedule) of the agreement, pursuant to Council direction and subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and authorize the Mayor to execute said document upon its completion. The consultant estimates eight months for completion of Phase 1 (September 1991 through April 1992, with a September 1, 1991 start date). 3. Not contract with a professional qualified consultant for Records Management services contract, and instead: a. Authorize a new staff position for a records manager with the training and experience that would enable the in-house development and implementation of a records management program (a survey of three local cities with a position of this type shows an annual salary range of $28,236 through $38,460); or b. Authorize the hiring of temporary personnel to be trained to handle the day-to-day office tasks to enable the City Clerk and/or Deputy City Clerk to attend the necessary training classes, research the programs of other cities, and devote their time to the in-house development and implementation of a records management program (the annual salary of a B -step secretary for the temporary replacement of the Deputy City Clerk would be $26,160). It is important to note with either of these two options that the resources available to a professional consultant (i.e., vast experience with other cities, staff to conduct research, etc.) would be unavailable to a City employee 5 devoted to this project. Conducted in-house, the project would be more time-consuming and costly in the long run. No,Le": Elaine Doerfling City -'Clerk Concur: /// 4l fly. c r-t..e z.� J M"r�erite Sturgs Computer System Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Not available for signature Kevin B. Northcrai't, City Manager Viki Copeland,Finance Director Complete documents avilable for viewing in the City Clerk's office. 6 FEE COMPARISON FOR TOP THREE FIRMS (for joint staff/consultant effort) Bigelow Kattlove Savage PHASE 1 (CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) (PROJECT COORDINATION) $ 5,000 I. ACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Records Inventory $ 1,500 $ 2,500 $ 1,345 2. Records Retention Schedule $ 7,500 $ 800 $ 2,135 3. Purging of Files (incl. in #5) $ 800 (incl. in #5) 4. Creation, Master File System $ 7,500 $ 1,600 $ 955 5. File Preparation & System $ 5,000 $ 800 $ 4,070 Implementation 6. Comprehensive File Cross- $ 4,000 $ 1,000 $ 360 Reference Index 7. Filing Procedures Manual $ 5,000 $ 1,475 $ 1,765 II. RECORDS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION $ 1,000 $ 3,700 $ 1,790 III. INACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Reorg of Inactive Records $ 1,000 $ 1,900 $ 3,950 2. Inactive Records Locator Log $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 900 3. Inactive Records Procedures $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 610 IV. SUPPLIES & EXPENSES ($700-$2,500) ($450) ($990) V. DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN No Charge $ 2,450 $ 1,920 MAXIMUM TOTAL FOR PHASE 1 $42,500 $19,975 $20,790 PHASE 2 (OTHER DEPARTMENTS) $16,000 (firm) $25,000- $50,000- $45,000 $75,000 (estimate) (estimate) MAXIMUM TOTAL FOR CITYWIDE $58,500 $44,975- $64,975 $70,790- $95,790 FEE COMPARISON FOR TOP THREE FIRMS (for joint staff/consultant effort) Bigelow Kattlove Savage PHASE 1 (CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) (PROJECT COORDINATION) $ 5,000 I. ACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Records Inventory $ 1,500 $ 2,500 $ 1,345 2. Records Retention Schedule $ 7,500 $ 800 $ 2,135 3. Purging of Files (incl. in #5) $ 800 (incl. in #5) 4. Creation, Master File System $ 7,500 $ 1,600 $ 955 5. File Preparation & System $ 5,000 $ 800 $ 4,070 Implementation 6. Comprehensive File Cross- $ 4,000 $ 1,000 $ 360 Reference Index 7. Filing Procedures Manual $ 5,000 $ 1,475 $ 1,765 II. RECORDS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION $ 1,000 $ 3,700 $ 1,790 III. INACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Reorg of Inactive Records $ 1,000 $ 1,900 $ 3,950 2. Inactive Records Locator Log $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 900 3. Inactive Records Procedures $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 610 IV. SUPPLIES & EXPENSES ($700-$2,500) ($450) ($990) V. DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN No Charge $ 2,450 $ 1,920 MAXIMUM TOTAL FOR PHASE 1 $42,500 $19,975 $20,790 PHASE 2 (OTHER DEPARTMENTS) $16,000 (firm) $25,000- $50,000- $45,000 $75,000 (estimate) (estimate) MAXIMUM TOTAL FOR CITYWIDE $58,500 $44,975- $64,975 $70,790- $95,790 Further, the CITY shall be responsible for the timely fulfillment of its responsibilities under this Agreement. In the event that CITY actions or inactions interrupt or delay the CONSULTANT's performance, the CONSULTANT shall notify the CITY in writing. Failure on the CITY's part to correct the lack of performance or schedule delay in a timely manner shall be cause for the CONSULTANT to request a contract modification. Section 3. Project Responsibility - CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT's Project Director shall be Susan Bigelow, a Principal of the CONSULTANT, who shall be responsible for setting procedural guidelines for the CONSULTANT's role, for coordinating efforts related to this project, and who shall serve as the main contact person. Section 4. Products & Services. The CONSULTANT shall provide products and services as specified in Phases of the Susan Bigelow Associates' proposal to the City Clerk's Office, dated 22 April 1991, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof. Section 5. Period of Performance. The services described herein shall begin on 1991, and be completed within months, unless a different schedule is agreed to in writing by both parties to this Agreement. Section 6. Compensation. The total compensation for professional services described in Section 4 above shall not exceed . The CONSULTANT shall bill the CITY on a monthly basis for services -performed under this Agreement. Progress payments of $ for professional services shall be due the last day of each month, with the initial payment due , 1991, providing services have commenced in , 1991. In addition to professional services, the CITY shall reimburse the CONSULTANT for all direct expenses, up to a maximum of $2,500. Such direct expenses may include mileage (at 35 cent per mile), lodging, duplicating, printing, graphics, supplies, postage and telephone costs. Direct expenses will be billed as incurred; invoices will be documented with receipts and/or mileages. Section 7. Extra Work. The CITY may, from time to time, authorize in writing additional work not covered under Section 4 of this Agreement. Compensation for extra work will be on a time -and -expense basis and at mutually agreeable rates and schedules. Section 8. Non -assignment of Agreement. The CONSULTANT acknowledges that this Agreement is not assignable and that the services of the CONSULTANT are of the essence. Section 9. Confidential & Copyright Information. The CITY and CONSULTANT agree that certain materials developed under this Agreement may be confidential to the CONSULTANT or copyright -protected by the CONSULTANT. Such materials shall be plainly and prominently marked by the CONSULTANT. The CITY shall use all reasonable means to insure that the CONSULTANT's confidential information is safeguarded. The CITY agrees, to the extent permitted by law, not to reproduce or distribute the CONSULTANT's copyrighted information for use by an agency other than the CITY without prior written permission from the CONSULTANT. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, the CITY shalL not be liable for breach of copyright in the event such material is requested pursuant to the Public Records Act and is reproduced and distributed as a result of such request. Section 10. Independent Contractor. The CONSULTANT acknowledges it is acting as an independent contractor for the services stipulated under this Agreement. Section 11. Conflict of Interest. The CONSULTANT hereby expressly convenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required to be performed under this Agreement. Section 12. Laws and Regulations. The CONSULTANT, its employees and representatives, shall at all times comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, statutes, rules or regulations, including those relating to wages, hours, fair employment practicies, anti-discriminatio, and safety and working conditions. Section 13. Taxes. The CONSULTANT shall have full and exclusive liability for the payment of any and all taxes and contributions for unemployment insurance, retirement benefits, life pensions, annuities and similar benefits which may not or hereafter be imposed by law or collective bargaining agreements with respect to persons employed by the CONSULTANT for performance of work under this Agreement. Section 14. Insurance. The CONSULTANT agrees to provide evidence satisfactory to the CITY of insurance coverages with CITY designated as an additional named insured, with the provision that such insurance shall be primary for any loss or injury arising from the CONSULTANT's performance of this Agreement, and further providing for 30 days notice prior to any cancellation or material change, to be maintained in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, as follows: A. Comprehensive General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily and personal injury, injury to or destruction of property, including loss of use resulting therefrom; B. Automobile Liability Insurance: $100,000/$300,000 limits; C. Worker's Compensation Limits, as required by the Labor Code of the State of California, should CONSULTANT hire employees to perform under this Agreement. The CITY agrees to reimburse CONSULTANT for additional coverages required by the CITY but not listed specifically above. Section 15. Indemnification. The CONSULTANT hereby agrees to save, hold harmless, defend and indemnify the CITY and its officers, agents and employees from any and all liability or claim of liability, including attorney fees, arising by reason of personal injury, death or property damage and resulting from or arising out of or in consequence of CONSULTANT's negligent acts, intentional acts, errrors or omissions in the performance of services under this Agreement. Section 16. Termination. Either party, at its option, by notice in writing, may terminate at any time the performance of services under this Agreement. upon receipt of any such notice, the CONSULTANT shall immediately discontinue services and deliver to the CITY all completed work and.) work in process, including preliminary drafts and organizational plans. In the event of such termination, the Section 7. Extra Work. The CITY may, from time to time, authorize in writing additional work not covered under Section 4 of this Agreement. Compensation for extra work will be on a time -and -expense basis and at mutually agreeable rates and schedules. Section 8. Non -assignment of Agreement. The CONSULTANT acknowledges that this Agreement is not assignable and that the services of the CONSULTANT are of the essence. Section 9. Confidential & Copyright Information. The CITY and CONSULTANT agree that certain materials developed under this Agreement may be confidential to the CONSULTANT or copyright -protected by the CONSULTANT. Such materials shall be plainly and prominently marked by the CONSULTANT. The CITY shall use all reasonable means to insure that the CONSULTANT's confidential information is safeguarded. The CITY agrees, to the extent permitted by law, not to reproduce or distribute the CONSULTANT's copyrighted information for use by an agency other than the CITY without prior written permission from the CONSULTANT. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, the CITY shalL not be liable for breach of copyright in the event such material is requested pursuant to the Public Records Act and is reproduced and distributed as a result of such request. Section 10. Independent Contractor. The CONSULTANT acknowledges it is acting as an independent contractor for the services stipulated under this Agreement. Section 11. Conflict of Interest. The CONSULTANT hereby expressly convenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required to be performed under this Agreement. Section 12. Laws and Regulations. The CONSULTANT, its employees and representatives, shall at all times comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, statutes, rules or regulations, including those relating to wages, hours, fair employment practicies, anti-discriminatio, and safety and working conditions. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE A RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BACKGROUND The City of Hermosa Beach, incorporated in 1907 and located in the County of Los Angeles, is a general law city of approximately 1.2 square miles with a current population of approximately 19,764 residents. The City staff size is approximately 212; this includes full and part-time employees. An informal inventory has been conducted of all records at City Hall since incorporation in 1907. It has been determined that retention schedules are either limited, or unknown for the majority of the records on file; thus very little has been eliminated. Records are maintained in a variety of filing systems throughout City Hall, with each department maintaining its own files and establishing its own filing systems. Many departments are utilizing the alphabetical filing system with no index filing guide. The City Clerk's office presently has a legislative history software application in-house called INDEX/3000. Index/3000 provides a tool for recording summaries of important documents and locating them quickly. It is specifically designed to support the City Clerk functions. - Improves access to information and reduces effort to obtain it - Significantly improves speed and accuracy of record searching - Extended city wide, it provides the core of a centralized record index that can reduce the time and space devoted to filing and retrieving documents The possible use of this software application for the records management system should be considered by the Consultant. The Consultant in evaluating the staffing requirements needed for the proposed program should consider that currently there are two positions. The City Clerk is required to work a minimum of 20 hours per week and the City Clerk Deputy is a full time position. Due.) to budgetary restraints staffing would not be increased in the near future. OBJECTIVE Establishment of a Records Management System to service as many facets of City operations as feasible. The program would be initiated in the City Clerk's office, and then phased throughout the other departments of City Hall. To ensure that the City develops the best possible records management system, as well as a sound plan for implementation, requires the services of a qualified consultant. The consultant may provide training of staff, the services outlined and assist the City Clerk in preparing specifications for a records management system, and making recommendations to staff and the City Council. SCOPE OF SERVICES The immediate concern of the City is determination of the records management and micrographic/electronic requirements of the City. The selected consultant, using City staff to reduce consultant costs where possible, shall perform a comprehensive analysis of all records and documents of each department and from this shall make recommendations on the development and implementation of a uniform records management program for the City. The scope of the work shall also include, but not be limited to, those tasks... listed. The consultant may propose additional tasks to be undertaken during the study and such recommendation will be evaluated by the City and may be included in the ultimate services contract. I. ACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Records Inventory A complete physical inventory of all files (active and in- active). The inventory shall identify categories of files and assist in the development of the functional topics for the filing system; it shall identify files which may be destroyed immedi- ately and those which must be kept for specified periods of time; and it shall serve as a master filing index. 2. Records Retention Schedule Retention schedules, reflecting legal requirements, shall be prepared for all records. A draft of the retention schedules shall be submitted for review and approval by appropriate staff and the City Attorney. The final retention schedules shall reflect both State and Federal legal requirements and retention information based on staff input as to the historic, research, and administrative value of records. 3. Purging of Files Using the approved retention schedules, inactive records which must be kept for a longer period of time shall be removed from the active files and prepared for transfer to an alternate storage area; permanent records that should be protected from 2 - potential loss shall be identified; and obsolete records shall be segregated and prepared for destruction. A list of records proposed for destruction shall be submitted for approval by Department staff, the City Clerk and the City Attorney. A resolution authorizing their destruction, along with the necessary exhibits, shall then be prepared for submittal to the City Council. 4. Creation of Master Functional Filing System Using the inventory results, a practical, functional filing system shall be created to be used on a citywide basis. Func- tions performed by the various departments shall be identified and records categorized and subcategorized within each function. Color codes shall be developed to prevent misfiling and to indi- cate retention information. Draft functions and categories shall be submitted for review, comment, suggestions and/or modifications, to City Clerk and/or designated staff member. t 5. File Preparation and System Implementation Once the filing system has been approved, the actual filing system implementation shall begin, and all remaining active files shall be incorporated into the new system. Materials to accom- plish the project shall be specified. It shall be the option of the City to purchase the supplies from the consultant or from an outside source. 6. Comprehensive File Cross-reference Index • A comprehensive cross-reference index shall be prepared to direct all users to the appropriate location of information within the filing system. 7. Filing Procedures Manual The filing procedures manual shall contain, at minimum: a. legal authorities setting forth requirements relating to the management of public records; b. a complete description of the filing system; c. an identification and explanation of the functional categories and subcategories of the system; d. the color coding and numerical sequence of the func- tional filing categories; e. pertinent exhibits, as necessary, to make the system practical and useful to both current and future staff; f. guidelines for a periodic review to remove inactive records; and g the manuals shall become the property of the City and shall be provided in a form that can be updated. II. RECORDS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION A. Computerized Records Management System Information It is proposed that a software program for the anticipated micro -based computer system be designed or an alternate methods of storage and retrieval systems that will retain the record management information. It also will include the following features: access to information, rapid retrieval of information, ability to print out specific information and create reports. III. INACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM This program to be accomplished after Task I is complete (Active Records Program). 1. Reorganization of Inactive Records The inactive records removed from the active filing system shall be reorganized by a record series where possible in standardized storage cartons or files. A color coding system relating to destruction shall be established. 2. Inactive Records Locator Log A Records Locator Log, listing all inactive records (by location, record series, and future destruction date), shall be prepared. This log shall aid in retrieving inactive records, as well as in location assignments for records to be transferred to inactive storage in the future. It shall be formatted for easy entry onto the City's computer system. 3. Inactive Records Procedures To provide for the ongoing maintenance for the inactive records program, the following procedures shall be provided for: a) transferring records from the active system to storage; b) receiving and storing records in the inactive storage area; c) determining micrographic needs of program; d) security of stored records; e) future destruction of inactive records; f) reusing storage cartons and locations; and g) maintaining locator logs. IV. SUPPLIES AND EXPENSES The Consultant shall specify a list of all required supplies and expenses such as folders, labels, boxes, computer disks, etc. on a not -to -exceed basis. V. DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN The Consultant shall provide plans for the protection of both paper and electronically stored files. FEES Maximum fee to be charged for records management services (Exhibit A) to be itemized for each task as specified: I. ACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM Fee shall include records inventory, records retention schedule, purging of files, creation of master functional filing system, file preparations and system implementation, comprehen- sive file cross-reference index and filing procedures manual. II. RECORDS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Fee shall include creation of software program for access to Records Management information and the related estimated cost for required data entry. III. INACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM Fee shall include reorganization of inactive records, creation of an inactive records locator log with separate fees for the input to be done by the Consultant or City staff. IV. SUPPLIES AND EXPENSES The Consultant shall specify a list of all required sup- plies and expenses such as folders, labels, boxes, computer disks, etc. on a not -to -exceed basis. V. DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN The Consultant shall provide plans for the protection of both paper and electronically stored files. PROJECT PLAN Upon acceptance of proposal, Consultant shall prepare a work project plan including benchmarks. SYSTEM AUDIT Consultant shall perform an audit of the system approximately six months after its installation to. ensure that it is running smoothly and efficiently. GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS General terms and conditions shall be provided to the selected Consultant prior to signing the contract. PRE -PROPOSAL CONFERENCE A pre -proposal conference will be held to answer any questions that the prospective firms may have regarding the City's Request for Proposal (RFP). The City Clerk and/or Computer System Manager shall conduct a site visit if requested. It is requested that the prospective firms contact the City if they will attend the pre -proposal conference in order that appro- priate arrangements can be made. All consultants must contact the City prior to, or at the pre -proposal conference to be on the mailing list for additional information regarding the City's RFP. CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE RFP All questions or requests for information submitted in writing will receive a written response from the City. All prospective consultants who attend the pre -proposal conference will receive copies of all such correspondence. Telephone communications with City staff are not encouraged, but will be permitted in the interest of a timely response. However, it is an explicit provi- sion of the RFP that any oral communication is not binding on the City's proposal process or award of contract. PROPOSAL CONTENT The firm's proposal must contain the following information: 1. Experience and history of the firm in developing and implementing records management programs for local governments, as well as any other related experience. This section should also include a listing of references that may be contacted regarding the firm's experience, type of projects completed, and name, address and tele- phone number. 2. Copies of records management programs prepared for other ?local governmental agencies. 3. Identification of staff capabilities along with resumes of key personnel who will be assigned to the project. In- dicate any government experience. 4. A brief description of your firm's approach and plans for each task. Include any other services recommended other than those specifically requested. 5. Proposed time frames required to phases of the records management estimated starting date. 6. Statement indicating the type of required by Consultant from City relationship resulting therefrom. 7. Fee schedule. complete the various program, including information and time staff in the working PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION Proposals must be submitted (in a sealed envelope "Proposals for Records Management") to the City Clerk 2:00 p.m., April 25, 1991. ADDRESSED: City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive, Room 201 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Two copies of the proposal should be submitted evaluated by the City Clerk and designated person. Selection criteria consulting firm's Understanding of work scope Demonstrated professional skills and credentials of the staff to be assigned to the records management program - Quality of the proposal - Approach to performing the Proposed maximum fee - References and similar governmental agencies The award of the contract will not necessarily be based on the lowest maximum fee proposed, but on a combination of all of the above factors. Additionally, the City reserves the right to select portions of the firm's proposal based on the fee quoted for each major task due to budgetary constraints. The City also reserves the right to reject all proposals. The City welcomes proposals for specific areas to be addressed in the Records Management System. will be the City's marked before which will be evaluation of the records management projects performed for program other EXHIBIT "A" FEE SCHEDULE SUMMARY PHASE 1 I. ACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Records Inventory 2. Records Retention Schedule 3. Purging of Files 4. Creation of Master File System 5. File Preparation & System Implementation 6. Comprehensive File Cross -Reference Index 7. Filing Procedures Manual *PERFORMED BY **DIRECTED BY CONSULTANT CONSULTANT II. RECORDS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION (Include recommendations for computer application and data entry) III. INACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Reorganization of In- active Records 2. Inactive Records Locator Log 3. Inactive Records Procedures IV. SUPPLIES & EXPENSES V. DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN PHASE 2 INTEGRATING OTHER DEPTS. INTO PROGRAM * PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT - If consultant and his/her staff were to complete task **DIRECTED BY CONSULTANT - Consultant directs existing City staff on task outlined (may include recommendation for additional staff) 8 BIGELOW ASSOCIATES 2317 Highview Lane • Sprint! Valley. CA 92077 • (619) 464-4911 22 April 1991 Ms. Elaine Doerfling City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Ms. Doerfling: In response to your March 18, 1991 Request for Proposals (RFP), Susan Bigelow Associates is pleased to submit the attached proposal for the design and implementation of a records management program for the City Clerk's Office of the City of Hermosa Beach. Records management, as you are well aware, is of increasing concern to all public agencies. This is a result of many factors, including: • the production of paper (records) at a faster rate than ever before • public records access requirements • litigation potential • the need to protect and preserve vital/historic records from loss during a disaster `• steadily increasing costs of personnel, equipment and supplies, and . • budgetary cutbacks, requiring increased efficiency. These factors demand that records and information be handled with minimum effort and cost. Additionally, the efficient assembly, processing and storage of information, and its rapid retrieval, are prime factors which make all individuals within an organization more productive and effective. We would like to assist you in establishing a records program which could result in significant savings for the City through: — safely storing key records in accordance with the City's needs and in conformance with federal and state requirements —providing rapid, low-cost access to both active and inactive records —more effectively and efficiently utilizing office and storage space, and — disposing of obsolete records in a legally appropriate and timely manner As you will note in our proposal, our method of approach includes a joint client/consultant effort, because we feel that the direct involvement of department staff throughout the design and installation process helps ensure their familiarity with and the day-to-day usability and efficiency of the program. In addition to department staff, we have successfully used 1 temporary employees or community volunteers hired by our clients for the file conversion process. This may be of interest to the City in order to accomplish its goal in the shortest time possible. We understand that your goal is to establish a successfully operating records/information management system within the City Clerk's Office, prior to City-wide expansion. We have included our recommendations for phases and tasks to achieve your objective, along with estimated costs and time requirements for our portions of the program. The costs and time requirements assume that a key City staff person will be designated as project manager for the City in order to regularly interface with us and with other City staff who may be assigned to work on the project. The Request for Proposals called for submittal of seven specific items, which may be found in the following locations of our proposal: Item #1: Item #2: Item #3: Item #4: Item #5: Item #6: Item #7: Experience & history of our firm, including references: Appendix A Copies of records programs designed for other agencies: Appendix B If invited to an oral interview, we will bring samples of our completed manuals and provide detailed discussions of our systems. Staff capabilities: Appendix A Approach and task plans: Proposal, pages 2-5 Time estimates: Proposal, pages 8 & 10 Staff time and input requirements: Proposal, page 8 Fee schedule: Proposal, pages 5-8; RFP form is on page 9 Appendix C contains reference information regarding records management in general, a description of our version of MUFFS (Municipal Unified Functional Filing System), and a chart indicating records management responsibilities which could be assigned to City staff. In closing, we are prepared to proceed with the programs for the costs specified (costs will remain effective until September 30, 1991) or to submit additional information if requested. We have proposed a September 1 start date, however that is negotiable if you are anxious to get the program started earlier. Please feel free to call us with any questions. We look forward to the possibility of working with you and the City of Hermosa Beach on this most important project. Sincerely, Susan Bigelow, CMC, CEO PROPOSAL CONTENTS Letter of Submittal I. PROPOSAL Page Introduction 1 Objective 1 Scope 1 Method of Approach 2 Phase I: Project Coordination 2 Phase II: Active Records Program 2 Phase III: Records Management Information 4 Phase IV: Inactive Records Program 4 Phase V: Disaster Recovery Plan 5 Phase VI: Integrating Other Departments Into Program 5 Project Fees Supplies & Expenses 5 Professional Fees 6 RFP Fee Schedule Summary 9 Project Plan 8 Proposed Project SchedulefTime Requirements 8 System Audit 8 Continuing Assistance 8 Conclusion 11 IL APPENDIX A: QUALIFICATIONS A History of Susan Bigelow Associates Project Abstracts & References III. APPENDIX B: SAMPLE PROGRAMS & FORMS W. APPENDIX C: REFERENCE INFORMATION What is Records Management? What is MUFFS? a a RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTRODUCTION The Request for Proposals has established that: • The City of Hermosa Beach, incorporated in 1907, has a current population of 19,000+, with a City staff of 212. • Records are currently maintained in a variety of different methods and filing systems throughout City Hall; each department has established and maintains its own filing system. There is little or no indexing standardization, which has resulted in records duplication and over -utilization of available storage space. • An informal inventory of records (both active and inactive) has been conducted, indicating a total number of 1440 boxes/file drawers, 237 belonging to the City Clerk. Retention schedules are either limited or unknown for the majority of records, and very few records have been destroyed. • The City Clerk's Office presently uses the legislative history software application INDEX/3000. It improves access, speed and accuracy when retrieving information, and should be considered for city wide use when a centralized record index has been established. The City Clerk's Office has indicated its interest in establishing a comprehensive records program—which may later be expanded to include other City departments—for organizing, maintaining and preserving its records in a more consistent and computerized manner. Such a system will result in significant savings for the Office, as outlined in the letter of submittal. OBJECTIVE The object of this proposal is to define the Susan Bigelow Associates' efforts in working cooperatively with City Clerk department staff to establish a comprehensive records management program. SCOPE The scope of this proposal includes the design and implementation of programs to organize and maintain the active, archival and inactive records for the Office of the City Clerk. This proposal addresses only those records generally kept by the Office which pertain to its principal and ongoing functions and which are normally stored in a paper mode. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Susan Bigelow Associates Records Management Proposal METHOD OF APPROACH Susan Bigelow Associates is a small group of highly qualified professionals specializing in records and information management programs, primarily for governmental agencies. Thus, we are thoroughly proficient in designing and organizing comprehensive records programs, but, because of our size and because of our continuing contracts with various agencies, we are not prepared to undertake all the work in installing such an extensive program. More importantly, we feel that the direct involvement of department staff throughout the design and implementation process helps ensure their familiarity with and the day-to-day usability and efficiency of the program. Therefore, we have chosen to propose the following phases and tasks to assist the Office of the City Clerk in establishing its comprehensive records program. Phase I — Project Coordination Task I -A. Meetings with Department Staff. We hold project initiation meetings with staff .to explain the overall approach, components and action plan for the comprehensive program. Discussions include such topics as the system design, components which lend themselves to computerization, necessary time schedules, selecting and involving departmental records personnel in the program, etc. In addition to the start-up meetings, we hold monthly meetings with department staff/ temporary records personnel for purposes of training, responding to questions, reviewing progress, motivating staff, etc. Thus, we would be on-site on a regularly scheduled basis. This phase is essential to the success of the program. Phase H — Active Records Program Task II -A. Records Inventory. We train and supervise you and department staff/ temporary records personnel in performing a complete, physical inventory of the records to be included in the program. The inventory consists of an identification of types of records being kept for inclusion in the filing system, cross-reference index and retention schedules. It also identifies inactive records which may be transferred to lower cost storage; and obsolete records which may be scheduled for immediate destruction. Task II -B. Master Functional Filing System. Using the inventory results, we design a practical, functional filing system for the City Clerk's Office which can easily be adapted at a later date for use on a City-wide basis. We will present the initial system in skeletal form; City Clerk staff will then have the opportunity to identify specific or additional subcategories of records that are necessary to the efficient, day-to-day operation of the department. In this way, you will have maximum input into the system regarding its primary functions, and the process will ensure that the final system is appropriate to, and practical for, the Office of the City Clerk. 2 a a a i a 1 1 1 Susan Bigelow Associates Records Management Proposal Color coding is then developed for the numerical labels, for retention purposes, to identify departmental ownership of files, and perhaps for segregation of project areas or years. This color coding is a cost-effective technique for helping to prevent misfiling, as well as for indicating retention information. Task II -C. Comprehensive File Cross -Reference Index. Using the inventory results and the master filing system, we provide a comprehensive, alphabetical cross-reference index to direct all users to the appropriate location of information within the filing system. Once the cross-reference index is installed on the City's computer equipment, we train department staff to incorporate additional references based on the new, active file labels. Task II -D. Records Retention Schedules. We have researched the legal requirements for a wide variety of records and will draw upon our information base whenever possible to address the types of records retained by the City Clerk's Office, as identified in the records inventory (Task II -A above). We will submit a list of records identified in the inventory which need further clarification by City Clerk staff and/or a list of additional records needing retention research by the City Attorney. (Note: Clarification time should be minimal; also, it is likely that retention research will be minimal, if needed at all, since retention was recently verified for 13 departments for another municipal client.) We will then prepare detailed records retention schedules, based on current state and federal law and on common recordskeeping practices, which will identify for each records series: (1) an office of record, (2) required retention periods, and (3) microfilming requirements. The schedules will reflect historic, research, evidential and administrative values of records, in addition to legal retention requirements. Draft schedules will be submitted to the City Clerk for review and comment prior to submittal of the final schedules. Thus, this task will include (a) a review of the records inventory; (b) categorization of the records into records series; (c) possible department staff research as needed on additional inventory clarification and retention; (d) submittal of draft retention schedules; (e) review of the proposed schedules by the City Clerk and the City Attorney; and (f) submittal of the final retention schedules. Task II -E. Purge & System Implementation. Using the inventory results, retention schedules, master filing system and cross-reference index, we train and supervise department staff/temporary records personnel in reviewing files and segregating the contents into (a) active, (2) inactive, and (3) obsolete categories. Department staff/temporary records personnel then (again, with our training and supervision): —incorporate active records into the new system, using the color coding techniques; — segregate inactive records for inclusion in an active records program; and — prepare obsolete records for destruction list that may be used as a Resolution exhibit. Task II -F. Records Management Manual. A comprehensive records management manual is essential to the ongoing maintenance of the records program and to make the system easy to use by both current and future staff. The manual will contain, at minimum: 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 Susan Bigelow Associates Records Management Proposal • a complete description of the comprehensive filing system • an identification and explanation of the functional file categories and subcategories of the system • the color coding and numerical sequence of the functional file categories • the master filing system guide • the alphabetical cross-reference index to the numerical system • records retention and disposition information • guidelines for a periodic review of the active system to remove inactive/obsolete records • pertinent exhibits, as necessary, to make the system practical and useful to both current and new staff; and • procedures for. — filing within the system —creating new files —retrieving active files —destroying original and duplicate records. We will submit originals of the above items for duplication and incorporation by the City into a loose-leaf binder. Costs for graphics for the manual cover are not included in the estimated cost; however, we will provide such costs upon request. Also not included are the binders, dividers, labels, etc. necessary to compile the manuals. Phase HI– Records Management Information Task III -A. Computerized Records Management System Information. While our firm does not specialize in computer systems design, we have successfully worked with our clients' in-house data processing personnel and/or computer consultants hired by our clients to provide input into their design of software applications. This proposal includes consulting time with computer specialists to assure that the selected software meets the City's needs. Phase IV – Inactive Records Program Task IV -A. Organization of Inactive Records. The inactive records removed from the active filing system (defined in Task II -E above) will be incorporated into an inactive program, by records series where possible. A color -coding system relating to destruction dates will be established. We train department staff/temporary personnel to (1) organize the records into standardized cartons and (2) prepare transfer forms for each carton. We supply the necessary forms and will also work with you to design the best use of available storage space. Task IV -B. Inactive Records Locator Logs. We train department staff/temporary personnel to prepare records locator logs, listing all inactive records (by location, records series, and future destruction date). The logs aid in retrieving inactive records, as well as in location assignments for records to be transferred to inactive storage in the future. They will 4 Susan Bigelow Associates Records Management Proposal be formatted for easy entry onto the City's computer equipment. Task IV -C. Inactive Records Procedures. To provide for the ongoing maintenance of the inactive records program, we prepare a complete description of the inactive program, including use of color coding; forms necessary for the program; and the following procedures for inclusion in the records management manual: — transferring records from the active system to storage — receiving and storing records in a records center —retrieving inactive records from a records center, and — destroying inactive records. Again, we will submit originals of the above items for duplication and incorporation by the City into the manual. Phase V – Disaster Recovery Plan Task V-A. Develop Disaster Recovery Plan. As a result of the Records Retention Schedules (Task II -D above), the City's permanent and vital records will have been identified. At no additional cost to the City, we propose to suggest various alternatives for their protection. Phase VI – Integrating Other Departments Into The Program Task VI -A. Departmental Integration. This phase has been incorporated into our fee schedule to allow for additional on-site coordination meetings; and consultations regarding the filing system guide, cross-reference index, retention schedules, system implementation, and inactive records reorganization. PROJECT FEES Supplies And Expenses The RFP requested that the Consultant specify a list of all required supplies an expenses such as folders, labels, boxes, computer disks, etc. on a not -to -exceed basis. We propose to present various supply options for consideration; however, we do not represent any particular supplier nor do we maintain a supply inventory. We feel that, due to your governmental status, you may be able to purchase supplies directly from an outside source at a lower cost than is available to us. Further, in this way you can establish a good working relationship with a supplier for future deliveries. Due to the size of the proposed project, it is not possible to accurately estimate quantities of supplies until the program is underway and until the records have been purged and segregated. 5 1 1 1 1 l 1 a 1 :J l i 1 Susan Bigelow Associates Records Management Proposal From our experience, we can estimate the following supplies per 100 standard drawers of records: Supplies Records Storage Cartons File Folders Numerical Labels File Folder Labels Color Coding Labels Out Guides Foam Clips (if needed) Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost 300 3,000 20,000 6,000 6,000 50 300 $600 $600 $600 $100 $50 $50 $50 Thus, per 100 drawers of records, the cost for the above supplies may be as high as $2,050. The supplies listed are standard stock items; costs could be higher if the City chooses to purchase customized file folders or pressboard classification folders for certain records. In addition, you will incur costs for (1) binders and dividers for the manuals (approximately $25 each for the supplies, plus graphics for the cover design and printing); (2) computer disks (cost will be approximately $30) for copies of data to be transferred from our equipment to the City's; and (3) possible charges for conversion of our computer programs to those compatible with the City's. You will also need used file folders for records transferred to storage (cost is $0 if used folders are available, or you currently have an inventory of folders which will not be practical for use in the new system). Other direct expenses may include mileage (35¢/mile), printing, postage, telephone charges and lodging (if necessary). These costs will vary, depending on the tasks selected. I estimate that the direct expenses could range from $700 to $2,500, if all tasks are selected. We carry professional business insurance ($1,000,000 limit) and automobile liability insurance ($100,000/300,000 limits). Costs for additional insurance coverages required by the City will be added to the total contract amount. The City may also incur costs for filing equipment and temporary personnel. With regard to equipment, we strongly recommend that, with implementation of a new records program that eventually will expand to incorporate all departments, the City consider purchasing letter -size, shelf -type filing equipment, which can result in a 70% reduction of floor space required to house records. Professional Fees We propose to provide consulting services, as specified in this proposal, on a time and materials basis. Our daily rate is $500. The City will be billed only for actual time spent. Monthly invoices for an agreed-upon sum will be submitted for payment. The following are our estimated time requirements and costs to fulfill our proposed tasks. Costs are contingent upon the acceptance of Phase I, Task I -A. These meetings will include 6 3 7 7 7 1 1 7 7 7 11 Susan Bigelow Associates Records Management Proposal problem solving, responding to questions, and training and supervision of departmental/ temporary records personnel in inventory procedures, filing system implementation, etc. Phase I — Project Coordination Task I -A. Meetings with Department Staff. If all items in the following phases are selected, we estimate our time requirements to be: 10 days @ $500 = $5,000 Phase II — Active Records Program Task II -A. Records Inventory. 3 days @ $500 = $1,500 Task II -B. Master Functional Filing System. 15 days @ $500 = $7,500 Task II -C. Comprehensive File Cross -Reference Index. 8 days @ $500 = - $4,000 Task II -D. Records Retention Schedules. 15 days @ $500 = $7,500 Task II -E. Purge & System Implementation. 10 days @ $500 = $5,000 Task II -F. Records Management Manual. 10 days @ $500 = $5,000 Phase III — Records Management Information Task III -A. Computerized Records Management System Information. 2 days @ $500 = $1,000 Phase IV — Inactive Records Program Task IV -A. Organization of Inactive Records. 2 days @ $500 = $1,000 Task IV -B. Inactive Records Locator Logs. 2 days @ $500 = $1,000 Task IV -C. Inactive Records Procedures. 3 days @ $500 = $1,500 Phase V — Disaster Recovery Plan no charge 7 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 i Susan Bigelow Associates Records Management Proposal Phase VI — Integrating Other Departments Into Program Following this page is the completed RFP Fee Schedule Summary (page 9). PROJECT PLAN $16,000 We propose to prepare a work plan, including benchmarks, for the selected phases and tasks. PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE/TIME REQUIREMENTS We have proposed a joint client/consultant work effort. This joint effort will be invaluable to the practical workability of the completed system and the least costly in terms of consultant fees. In using such an approach, it is difficult to estimate the time requirements to finish each of the above tasks. However, assuming adequate staffing levels and that all tasks are performed by the City staff as quickly and efficiently as possible, the project should be completed within about eight months for the City Clerk's Office, or a total of eighteen months if the program were expanded to incorporate all departments. Figure 1, ,following on page 10, gives a proposed project schedule showing a start date of September 1, 1991. However, we are willing to negotiate a sooner start date if the City so desires. Regarding the RFP's question #6 under "Proposal Content," it is not possible, at this time, to accurately estimate the Department staff time required to complete the project. Time required will be directly related to current staff levels, staff availability, and the volume of records to be addressed. SYSTEM AUDIT At no additional cost to the City, we will perform an audit of the records program approximately six months after its installation to ensure that it is running smoothly and efficiently. If necessary, informal suggestions and/or formal recommendations will be made to correct any problems identified by the staff or observed during the audit. CONTINUING ASSISTANCE Because it is important to us to provide the best system possible, we will continue to be available in the future to answer questions regarding programs that we have designed or installed. 8 7 a 1 1 1 i 1 1 EXHIBIT "A" FEE SCHEDULE SUMMARY *PERFORMED BY **DIRECTED BY CONSULTANX CONSULTANT PHASE 1' . 70Gr ed.:Walk) Arlo AJ p4cOe4 I. ACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM ew�'3+ 7;4 {ort 1. Records Inventory l,6OO 2. Records Retention Schedule i, 5Ao 3. Purging of Files 4. Creation of Master File System "7,e2pv 5. File Preparation & System Implementation 6. Comprehensive File Cross -Reference Index .bode 7. Filing Procedures Manual DOd i h c zacd in .5 II. RECORDS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION (Include recommendations for computer application and data entry) /,ODO III. INACTIVE RECORDS PROGRAM 1. Reorganization of In- active Records 2. Inactive Records Locator Log 3. Inactive Records Procedures f, foo IV. SUPPLIES & EXPENSES V. DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN PHASE 2 INTEGRATING OTHER DEPTS. INTO PROGRAM * PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT - to complete task 1,Ooo c a'ndd A f- 6 . pct 5) If consultant and his/her staf-weer. **DIRECTED BY CONSULTANT - Consultant directs existing Cit staff-_ on task outlined (may include fl( recommendation for additional—. staff) -9- Mty C7fy of H..„.„ la Be3Ch ...I. • c r�iii� Jai c�1� Figure 1 Office of The City Clerk • City of Hermosa Beach PROPOSED TASKS & PROJECT SCHEDULE* PROPOSED TASKS: I. Project Coordination Meetings & Training Staffing Requirements II. Active Records Program Inventory Filing System Creation Cross -Reference Index Retention Schedules Purge & Implementation Records Management Manual HI. Records Management Information Consult With Consultant IV. Inactive Records Program Organization Locator Logs Procedures V. Disaster Recovery Plan (included with retention schedules) di iiJAlma Josiii 1991 1992 Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr *Proposed schedule is estimated; actual time schedule is dependent upon City Staff availability for project implementation. Susan Bigelow Associates Records Management Proposal CONCLUSION The Records Management Program described in the foregoing pages has many advantages, the most important being: • The system will be custom designed to suit the specific needs of the City Clerk's Office of the City of Hermosa Beach. It will be based on programs in other cities that have successfully implemented similar systems. • Because the proposed program establishes retention data for all records, the City is assured that — unnecessary records can be destroyed — inactive files can be separated from active files for easier, less costly management and information retrieval; and —permanent and critical records can be identified and protected on an ongoing basis. • The inclusion of key City staff in the decision-making, design and implementation stages helps ensure the long-term success of the program. • The program will be under the direction of a former City Clerk who has first-hand knowledge of, and experience with, the day-to-day problems and needs of municipal agencies, as well as of legal requirements. • The program will be designed by a San Diego -based firm, making project coordination and implementation, as well as future contacts, convenient and timely. - 1 1 - March 4, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council March 12, 1991 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE A RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Request for Proposal for a consultant to prepare a Records Management System. Background: At its 1989 goal -setting workshop, the City Council established as one of its goals the development of a Records Management System. Council appropriated $20,000 in the FY 89-90 City Clerk's budget and directed staff to proceed with the project. At its meeting of April 24, 1990, the City Council requested that staff conduct an in-house inventory of existing records to determine the volume and scope of the project and to develop a list of the records kept by each department for the preparation of a retention schedule. At the time, there was also concern that the request was not timely with regard to the City Clerk's staffing. The approved money was reappropriated in the FY 90-91 budget, and the item was placed on hold pending the arrival of the General Service Director, who would be coordinating the computer work. Analysis: Currently, records are stored throughout City Hall by a variety of different methods and filing systems. Storage media includes book form and loose leaf. Book -form storage includes the use of bookcases, desktops and organizers, and wall -mounted shelves. Loose-leaf storage includes the use of three to five drawer file cabinets and boxes. There is little to no indexing conformity or method standardization between the departments, which results in a potential duplication of effort and over -utilization of available storage space. As requested by Council, staff has conducted an informal inventory of all City records in order to determine the approximate volume and scope of the records management project. Each department performed a physical count of pertinent files under their control and supervision, and the count totals reflect the sum of the departments' working files as well as those records stored off-site. The total number of boxes/file drawers 1 1 0 is 1440. To better visualize the volume of records currently being stored, a standard file drawer is about 30 inches deep, and a standard storage box is about 15 inches deep. Using 22.5 inches as an average depth, if all of the file drawers and boxes holding records were placed end to end, they would extend 900 yards, covering the length of nine football fields. • The following is a breakdown by department of the survey results: Department/ Total number Area Boxes/Files General Services 72 Police/Fire Department 200 Personnel 43 City Manager 55 Finance 440 Community Resources 50 Planning 97 Building 177 Public Works 69 City Clerk 237 Proposal: It is proposed that -the program be phased. Phase 1 would be the creation of a practical, functional system in the City Clerk's office, for the efficient management of active and inactive records. The City Clerk is the custodian of official City records and has the duty of protecting and preserving vital records as well as historical documents. The City Clerk's office also serves as the information center of City Hall and is frequently called upon to provide copies of documents requested by Council, staff, and citizens of the community. Documents in the City Clerk's office include ordinances, resolutions, minutes, deeds, contracts, agreements, leases, encroachments, liens, easements, street vacations, proof of publications, political action committee files, Fair Political Practices Commission documents, campaign statements, ,financial disclosure statements, commission/board applications and oaths of office, and various reports and records pertaining to Council actions. The ability to rapidly access and retrieve important documents is vital. The current method is time-consuming, costly and ineffective. Given the space limitations of City Hall and the volume of records the City has accumulated since 1907, a comprehensive system to accommodate both the existing and future needs of the City is imperative. With the limited staffing of the Clerk's office (one full-time Deputy and one part-time Clerk) and the ever-increasing volume of records (at more than 148 yards, the Clerk's existing records alone would extend across nearly one and a half football fields), this is a monumental task. The assistance and guidance of a consultant, expert in this field, is essential to develop and implement a records program in the Clerk's office. With the provision of appropriate forms and adequate instructions to staff for the preparation of a log of all City records, and following the established guidelines of 'the procedures manual (which would be developed in Phase 1), the program could then be expanded by staff throughout the other departments as Phase 2, providing uniformity throughout City Hall and eliminating any duplication of records. A comprehensive log of all City records is a necessary prerequisite for establishing retention schedules, and the knowledge obtained in Phase 1 will provide staff with the needed guidance on how to correctly complete the log themselves, thus reducing the consultant's cost. The program outlined in the request for proposal (RFP) is separated into categories, and the categories are further broken down by specific tasks. The consultants are requested to submit fees for each specific task, and the required form (see Exhibit "A") includes one column for fees if the work is performed by the consultant and another column for fees if the work is performed by staff under the direction of the consultant. It is proposed that the implementation of the program maximize, to the extent possible, the use of existing staff in performing the various tasks and thus minimize the cost of the program, although given staff resources, this may limit the speed and thoroughness of the overall effort. The RFP further states that, due to budgetary constraints, the City reserves the right to select portions of the firm's proposal based on the fee quoted for each major task, thereby allowing the program to be phased in as funds permit. Why this City needs a Records Management Program: 1. Allow for time and cost efficient management (adequate storage, rapid retrieval) of all records, and timely destruction of those records not required to be kept for legal purposes or historic value. 2. Consistency in records maintenance, regardless of storage media. Legal liability is decreased if records .re maintained lawfully and properly. 3. Vital records protection, including identification records, method of protection and preservation, and recovery planning. [Vital records include original ordinances, resolutions, deeds, capital and property accounts receivable, personnel and payroll records, engineering drawings, etc.] of vital disaster minutes, records, maps and 4. There is no Citywide data on records management issues, but difficulties are widely experienced. Crowded office space, lack of storage for inactive records, slowed re- search, duplicate filing, etc. 5. Access to and retrieval from inactive areas difficult, time consuming, and unsafe due to distance from active office areas, incomplete indexing, and the physical problems encountered in handling stacks of storage boxes. 6. Storage boxes exposed to flood and fire hazard, evidence of mice in some records areas (no damage found, based on cursory examination). 7. Data collected would suggest immediate measures that could be implemented to save time and space. 8. Data would be useful in estimating active and inactive records storage space and equipment requirements. 9. Blueprints badly deteriorated in paper and line quality, no indexing, no systematic location (in some departments), many are folded and too brittle for much use (need for micro- filming). Records are essential to the successful management of any organization. They are valuable tools used to assist an organization to attain its goals and objectives. Successful records management is a valuable asset. Poor 'records management can restrict an organization, reduce its effectiveness, and increase cost. Respectfully submitted, Cynthia Wilson, Director of Gene al Services by ' l arguerite urg-s Computer System Manager CONCUR: C�,, �.t. rte✓ Cyhia Wilson General Services Director CONCUR: X evin B. Northc :"ft City Manager Elaine Doerfling G' City Clerk Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director ezyge- t/h) September 19, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City of Hermosa Beach of September 24, 1991 POLICY ON COMMISSIONER TERMS Recommendation: That the City Council waive further reading and introduce the attached ordinance to clarify the terms and related matters of the Planning Commission. Background: At the May 28, 1991 City Council meeting, the Council requested the City Attorney to clarify commissioner term limits to make clear the method by which term limit maximums are to be calcu- lated. The City Attorney also advised the Council that he would clarify the language and procedures at the same time. Further, on September 10, 1991, the Council directed that this effort be made applicable to the Civil Service Board in addition to other lay commissions of the City. Background: The attached ordinance is recommended by the City Attorney fol- lowing input from City staff. The ordinance clarifies how a par- tial term is to be counted towards the maximum and how dis- continuous service is to be counted. It also clarifies the pro- cedure for removal of commissioners, and when a commissioner may continue to serve after leaving a commission pending selection of a successor. When the Council has approved these policies and language, the City Attorney and staff will return with similar ordinances for the remaining commissions of the City. evin B. Northcraft City Manager KBN/ld 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO TERMS OF OFFICE FOR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HERESY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 2-74 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 2-74. Terms of Member; Vacancies. The members of the planning commission shall be appointed for a term of four (4) years. -Ne. 'person shall be appointed for more than two ((/)\/1\ consecutive terms and no person who has held the position as a member of the Planning Commission for more than two years of a term to which some other person was originally appointed shall be reappointed as a member to more than. one additional consecutive term. For the purposes of this section, an interruption in service as a member of the Planning Commission for a period of two years \\\or more shall constitute an interruption in consecutive terms of office. If a vacancy shall occur otherwise than by expiration of term, it shall be filled by appointments by the city council for the unexpired portion of the term. Appointments shall be made pursuant to Government Code Section 54970 et seq. Members serve at the 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 pleasure of the City Council and may be removed, without cause, by'a majority vote of the City Council. Upon an expiration of term, vacancy, or resignation, said member of the commission may continue to serve until a successor is appointed and qualified. Where the City Council votes to remove a member of the commission, the City Council shall determine the effective date of said removal. Two (2) absences from regularly scheduled meetings of any member within one (1) calendar quarter, and/or four (4) absences from regular meetings within one (1) calendar year creates an automatic vacancy. There shall be no distinction between excused or unexcused absences. When an automatic vacancy occurs, the staff liaison shall promptly notify the city council, the commission, and the member. The automatic vacancy shall not be effective until council receives notice and fails to waive application of this section. The city council may waive application of the automatic vacancy upon its own motion; otherwise, the vacancy so created shall be filled pursuant to the above sections." 5310.01 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall- enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1991. ATTEST: President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Attorney 5310.01 3. September 16, 1991 City Council Meeting ,September 24, 1991 Mayor and Members of the City Council VACANCIES - BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PLANNING COMMISSION - UNEXPIRED TERM ENDING JUNE 30, 1992 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council appoint from among the eight applicants on file (applications attached) to fill the unexpired Planning Commission term ending June 30, 1992. Background: At the meeting of August 27, 1991, nine Planning Commission applications were presented for consideration, and Council scheduled a special meeting for 7 p.m., Thursday, September 19, 1991. for the purpose of conducting interviews of those applicants to fill the unexpired term created by the automatic vacancy of Commissioner James Peirce, with appointment to be made at the next regular City Council meeting of September 24, 1991. When the nine apicants were contacted by the City Clerk's office to schedule appointments for interviews, one of the applicants, George Brown, indicated he would be out of town and therefore unable to participate in the interview process scheduled for September 19. Another applicant, Michael D'Amico, withdrew his application from consideration. Applications are attached for the following: George G. Brown Kevin B. Epstein M.J. Lull Rod Merl Concur: Kevin B. Northcrgft, City Manager Dale Nowicki A. Abbey Silverstone Steven A. Suard Jason K. Wallace Elaine Doerflin Clerk 10a THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMI '7 NAME OF COMMISSION YL;z1�,,�,�`. /\ J of - PUG2�1991 , _4. 3'ION ctty cies■ city of Hermosa as.des r>/1 - :?i "Name: i--tk.c.7�- 6 ' gPhone: Home ,z., 370/ Si R Address /3(, iwrtic 4t(-7� -7,,-*-.% %lJ � f i Occupation -or Profession: 4i/5-e,fiyA._.� Name of Employer: � Bus. Phone:;-FiF-SF4%-Veilo Address of Employer: /j �s�3 L•�%�.� . r 1/.4)-1. J<47,- d- 7' T'! cr REFERENCES: - Local: litt° __.....-Professional: 4,Z..ai / je /7,_ - Other: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? 1 •��w/� lam- 2 Gc• ,mss r— LZ Com• •�1 _ GYt-c L,l,.- ' C=IZL'- !s . u- What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? ��✓vK i i:c,,,„ c .11..,• • ,Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes x No (If yes, please list) - •:,fin,$ i Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past -1_., activities. and ,other:: e C ------ ;---- , xperience- that��-you - feel would qualify you as a .L-attg:• ommission member. •r Are /' cZ -, e 97L1I 7 = 6 -1./? -1-1 /9 --1-5:4 e e.;t1 ..% This Commission meets on /-22445"at any scheduling at �� a= p.m. Do you foresee g problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes '.—No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Comments: 2 6/5/91 • •• Name: .{`S THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 214;:; APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMM � h • NAME OF COMMISSION �(,1[t�.1�5�� �>/�)� -(^.;\ \r� Home Phone: i3 -3i2-87`0 fkeMtsA AG4 cL 07 42. 4110,1131 Address: iol0 1 i+f S`7 4 Occupation or Profession: Name of Employer: Address of Employer: Got15atr-A-7t' REFERENCES: Local: Bus. Phone: 1T3 -375-7Z7+_ E A4-44—t4EaD Professional: Other: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): �o�lE i nl G.tAn= 14C2mo%A T�Q.104c4- Why do you wish to become a^ Commission Member? W tF►3T' . TA SLE AiJ VE ." / 4 TIDE A2V4A ME' OP E CAir t M clr�l`Ty �c7JEGoP.�.fF�7T �= aS 4 4C/t What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? ':17A'DI/i/is7&7L &Ca -G 1-~5 A anJ7 c -m1 An2c, £ cJ_ •:� 4; tv wout_ 2 cr situ -fig L71°Ftrza leF1-7 k 1 Do you have any current obligations or responsibij.ties which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes ✓No (If yes, please list) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past -activities and other experience that you -feel would qualify you as a Commission member. tikA 6f E " This Commission meets on 3 �vZSi"j� at 77eOp.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes v1 How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? ± Comments: Signed: Date: ,e6.--/•-1/ 2 6/5/91 Wednesday August 21, 1991 'Elaine Doerfling,Y.ity Clerk CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Room *203 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Ms Doerfling, Mr. Kevin B Epstein 1070 Tenth Street Hermosa Beach. CA 90254 (213)372-8790 I am applying to fill a vacancy of an unexpired term on the HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION. I have filed out the application supplied by your office and found it appropriate to submit with the aprilication the following attachment sheets. The attachment sheets are merely a more convenient way for me to give to you a clear and concise response to the questions asked of me. Also, l have included a somewhat recent Resume. This resume was current as of August 1, 1990,. which was about one year ago. However, It does include a comprehensive representation of my business, educational and other experience. I trust that it will be sufficient. During the past year, I have been a working for CONSTRUCTION TRADE NETWORK. CTN is engaged in the planning, development and construction of residential as well as commercial buildings. As of this date CTN, nor I, have any or planned involvement with any construction projects in The City of Hermosa Beach. Please submit the application and attachments to the appropriate civic body. Thank You Kevin B. Epstein 0 • • ADDIication Attachment for Planning Commission, Hermosa Beach California MR. KEVIN B. EPSTEIN August 2 1, 1991 Page 2 Of 2 LOCAL REFERENCES: 407.01. Mr Charles Adamson 637 Cypress Street Hermosa Beach. CA 90254 ' (213)372-3000 Mr Haley Lanz 1524 Montery Street #6 Hermosa Beach, CA A 90254 (213)372-8905 PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES: Mr Donald J. Levick, Fire Inspector City Of Redondo Beach Fire Department 401 South Broadway Redondo Beach, CA 90277 (213)318-0663 Mr Abby Parsa, Civil Engineer Parsa & Associates 423 South Pacific Coast Highway Redondo Beach, CA 90277 (213)540-2675 Mr Jeffery Butsher, Real Estate Agent West Coast Land Company 820 Manhattan Avenue Suite #205 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (213)376-8921 Mr David Groverman, Senior Plan Checker City of Manhattan Beach, Building Department 1400 Highland Avenue Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (213)545-5621 Mr Fred Burch, Real Estate Broker Re./Max Redondo Beach 1640 South Pacific Coast. Highway Redondo Beach, CA 90277 (213)540-2255 Mr Moe Kohan, Private Developer 207 Sout'h Redondo Avenue Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (213)374-7032 Mr and Mrs Gary Clark 1076 Tenth Street Hermosa Beach. CA 90254 (213)372-4518 Mr Mark Sabre, General Manager Learner Lumber 635 Pacific Coast Highway Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213)374-3406 Mr Ebbe Videriksen, A.I.A. Ebbe Videriksen & Associates Architects 15438 Ventura Boulevard Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 (818)783-1354 Mr Paul Connolly, Chief of Planning City of Redondo Beach, Department of Community Development 415 Diamond Street Redondo Beach, CA 90277 (213)318-0637 Mr Aaron Jones, Associate Planner City of Redondo Beach, Department of Community Development 415 Diamond Street Redondo Beach, CA 90277 (213)318-0637 Mr. Tim Shea, Chief Building Inspector City of Redondo Beach, Department of Community Development 415 Diamond Street Redondo Beach, CA 90277 (213)318-0637 Mr Michael Kerns, Private Developer 2910 Durand Drive Los Angeles, CA 90068 (213)962-9490 • Mr. Kevin B. Epstein 1070 Tenth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213)372-8790 1989 To sent Chief Operating Officer GDB Group, Incorporated Hired on a contract basis and charged with the responsibility to restructure business opera- tions of this property consulting firm. My duties include directing all levels of the day to day staff activities as well as developing and implementing new business plans while modifying the existing management structure. The primary focus and application of my time to date, has been to rearrange the corporation's financial equation and marketing mix. I have renegotiated several contracts, modified the basis by which direct costs of goods sold are incurred, authored a territorial sales expansion plan and put into effect several new product proposals. The current results which have been achieved through my direction and the efforts of the staff, can be recognized by a reduction of operating losses by sixty seven percent. Based upon this statistic and an incr4asing sales trend, I forecast that GDB Group's primary business unit can be at an operating breakeven within the next six months. 1987 / 1989 a General Partner Metropolitan Ventures, a Limited Partnership In the last quarter of 1986 I recognized the potential for extraordinary property value appreci- ation in certain areas of Southern California. To take advantage of this opportunity, I collabo- rated with a Real Estate and Investment Broker to form this Limited Partnership which devel- oped four residential projects. As one of the two General Partners, my participation in that capacity included all aspects of construction management for this real estate development enterprise. The approach I took in my functions was to carefully scrutinize every design and construc- tion decision from the basis of economic value. This method proved to be an invaluable man- agerial strategy which has been realized financially by all equity participators. The Limited Partners have received annual profits in excess of fifty four percent. Due to my special background in the Commercial Architecture and Construction Industry as well as my experience with the idiosyncrasies of civic government agencies, I was able to uti- lize my diversified talents where most developers would have to hire others. This experi- ence, along with a seasoned talent to operate cost efficiently, resulted in direct construction costs per square foot to be as much as thirty two percent less than that for comparable work as was originally estimated and budgeted. The fact that personal computer cost accounting software for the construction industry was not available off the shelf gave me an opportunity to draw upon my experience developing software applications. I wrote a single user program with a relational database product which served to be another contribution I made to our financial success. The program keeps track of all construction section budget balances as costs are incurred, design changes are made and as estimates are modified. It was during this time in my career that I secured a General Contractors License from the State of California. I have additional applications pending for specialty classifications in HVAC, Electrical, Plumbing and Concrete. Currently I do not take part in any business activities with Metropolitan Ventures as one property remains on the market for sale. I plan no additional involvement in new projects due to the lackluster Real Estate Market and my own personal objectives. Mr. Kevin B. Epstein 1070 Tenth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213)372-8790 u'r a 1987 / 1988 Proprietor usiness x . erience• .Facilities Furniture Alliance '. ; ; t"`1;-`;,.l;;Ai r+,-„ I was asked by the President of ERG International to continue certain responsibilities I had, as an employee at that firm, on an outside consulting basis. Due to my intricate understanding of ERG and the Contract Office Furniture Industry, I determined that it would be in our mutual best interest to accept the offer. My involvement included the continuation of product development, communications pro- duction, and assistance with strategic planning. I also made recommendations to the execu- tive team regarding certain decisions when I was called upon for direction and support. During this time I pursued additional clients and was hired as a consultant for several differ- ent projects of the marketing discipline. The quantity of projects I secured required that I hire staff for assistance. I maintained a small group of people with specialized talents on my pay- roll. Together we produced many effective communications materials, advertising campaigns and artwork, products from development plans we supervised as well as sales management software. 1986 / 1987 Director of Marketing and Sales ERG INTERNATIONAL (Formerly Ergonom Corporation) Engaged to be responsible for the delicate rearrangement of the marketing mix of this office seating manufacturer. Additionally I was charged with the accountability of, and acted as, National Sales Manager. This included the responsibility to motivate and administrate a large group of independent and employee sales representatives. Conducted the product redevelopment and transformed the existing presentation of a vast product line to enhance the perception of it as true Contract Office Furniture. Made adjust- ments to the price policy and channels of distribution for the company during a sensitive transition from an offering of primarily commercial office products to a contract seating line. I produced a number of six color brochures along with a 136 page Price List/Specification Guide. Working with an outside vendor, together we integrated a new computerized order- ing system to be interactive with the specifying guidelines within the price list. This material and computerized integration has proven to be easier for the customer base such as speci- fiers, dealers and end users as well as cost efficient to the firm. Created and performed company wide sales training and information seminars. I functioned as the National and Government Account Manager as I wrote, negotiated and secured several large scale National Contracts which were serviced by Local Dealers. Together with the President I guided the ongoing business decisions and policy formulation as the senior veter- an member of the executive management team. 1986 Account Executive Associates Purchasing Corporation - Responsibilities included sales and service of Knoll International business furniture as well as approximately 250 different contract office furniture products. Gathered and managed sales information for the sales organization. 1976 / 1986 Facility Planning Plan Tech Associates Consultant Steinmann, Grayson, Smylie Facility Sciences Corporation Accomplished space planning consultant with emphasis on the open office and industrial environment. Created and interpreted planning criteria including detailed surveys of client's operating conditions from a multitude of private industries as well as government agencies. Determined long range projections considering anticipated growth and resulting space requirements through the utilization of open office panel systems and Industrial Engineering. With the involvement in the prearchtectural planning and industrial engineering of over four million square feet of office and manufacturing space, this important adjunct to my career has broadened my awareness of the complexities and methods by which sophisticated corpora- tions and institutions make large capital plans and purchases. Mr. Kevin B. Epstein 1070 Tenth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213)372-8790 .,: , , 1980 / 1985 t. 1979 / 1980 1976 / 1978 President Cultivated a subcontracting firm into a complete manufacturing enterprise with annual sales in excess of three million dollars. Polished a comprehensive understanding of the labor, material and equipment resources utilized in the course of casegoods and office furniture production. Directed staff subordinates in all areas of cost accounting, sales contract negotia- tions, labor management and production control. Developed computerized cost estimating procedures for custom cabinet production. Designed standard joinery methods including the jigs and assembly techniques which could be utilized for both institutional caseoods and contract office furniture products. Enforced high standards of product quality control and created the customer service techniques which resulted in repeat sales contracts from a vast array of industries from the health care to law firms. _ usiness=Experiencez Cubulus Manufacturing Corporation -44 Created and organization that delivered what was specified from a comprehensive selection of over 400 casegood products. Developed and assembled product ordering procedures for specifiers which was known to be one of the easiest guides at the time to an broad selection styles, configurations and finishes. General Manager The Cubulus Collection Manager of an independent casegoods subcontracting company with food and beverage, hospitality and health care clients. Formulated and put to use contracts administration sys- tems which became the primary sales tool and attraction for specifiers and end users to buy from this firm. Sales Coordinator GEE Enterprises, Incorporated Direct practice in all aspects of a contract furniture sales representation business. Learned the methods of day to day sales presentations with Architects, Interior Designers, Dealers and End Users from the private and public sector. Fine tuned my understanding of the selling technique and learned the strategics of addressing objections, generating product specifica- tions and managing a dealer network for different product categories. Responsible for bookkeeping, hiring and training of showroom personnel and the allocation of showroom space to manufacturers samples. 1973 / 1976 Showroom Assistant Epstein / Gowman Associates Became familiar with product cataloging style and design, price list formats and sampling through the study of the library. Observed product presentations to potential customers. Learned the proper procedures to carefully handle and ship fine office furniture and the legalities of freight transactions. a Mr. Kevin B. Epstein 1070 Tenth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (213)372-8790 Managerial Philosophy T F ; Other Information Throughout my career I have exersized a dynamic business philosophy founded on a premise that can best be described as a cautiously aggressive management style. {f" ydr�"• ri' �•i.(.^!`. S- t r. { • ew+_ r� _ -T:� r 1 My general procedure is to carefully, yet efficiently, investigate and consider alternatives before I take action or make decisions. Normally, I seek out advise from the most trusted sources of consultation be they senior or subordinate staff, customers, vendors or members of the financial and legal communities. I am of the opinion that this procedure has been one reason why I have had relative success in many avenues throughout my career. Due to the number of years I have been in a professional environment, I have had an oppor- tunity to interface with countless customers, suppliers, staff members, consultants and stock- holders. I have developed a seasoned understanding of the positions from which most peo- ple communicate, negotiate and perform. This understanding, as well as my personal no- nonsense approach to all professional activities I engage, in has been an advantage to me that I apply in the capacities.,serve. I would like to describe two of many personal achievements which could be a benefit to any firm in which I am involved. - — - Personal Achievements I have the fluent ability to set up and use of personal computer systems and local area networks. My knowledge of computers extends from simple hardware specifi- cation capabilities to the development of relational data bases applications. Although I am a proficient user of most off-the-shelf software packages, I have the experience to know when an application may require a programming engineer. My involvement dates back many years which has given me a keen sense of the costs involved in most computer related purchase decisions. I utilize a computer for most all of my day to day activities and have enjoyed helping my executive colleagues in areas where the technology out paced their training. My primary involvement with manufacturing companies reflects my satisfaction with the production of tangible property. I have had many opportunities to prose- cute United States mechanical and design patent applications. I have also been responsible for numerous copyright and trademark applications. My broad under- standing of United States Trade Law and experience obtaining protection of intellec- tual assets has served almost every firm in which I have been with in the past. Education CONTINUING TECHNICAL EDUCATION Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Affiliations ASID American Society of Interior Designers AIA American Institute of Architects IBD Institute of Business Designers BIFMA Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Association ASHI American Society of Home Inspectors BIA Building Industry Association J References Available upon request Meeting arrangement To arranging a personal meeting, please contact me by sending your communica- tion in writing to the above address. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMI Cllr ck.� !f Mort of ,,,!nose Beech . o `� - %/ NAME OF COMMISSION (.AIV14iNG COMM 1''5(bJ :40` T. Name: . 1.4.11-(- Home Phone:61) 72-9 43 Address: 2440 Ai2Dmo E At/E. . /-IJ-MOs4 64w-(, CA. 90294 Occupation br Profession: 51.A&D1 v lS1o/4 e44(9z6/82.0.JE.cr OdJAkiel= Name of Employer: VTM (A) .T1 1/4C• Bus. Phone :6143)4:14 -$2Cp Address of Employer: �S'JO ,S/kL ,4 &VD 1`L0R ig-/DG CA q'3Z5 REFERENCESREFERENCES:6zewaci4D SMA M . E40 (j4.. P. } Local: ELATE C • MEAD ; IAL4 t-j�le- E).LLILL M 155Y ' 'W E L.c o J . Professional: D41/6- VAt1ATrA r: p„7upY• Q'Y1iO ioVicG1 OOi & Gi.(A€, •f lnr, Other: �►rous. aiks 4 PYt�j .Mgr - l�)i (nmu fci fto ; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): _ 41-11-Y pg t4 71(S 5 D /41 or ArtT o Cff Cs p' r) Aft p o BIDE. A Cb -AuY�J 6,15 Tlfe g A 15 I'm ApFtY& FOR 711 16 A -P PTMY 16 Ttmer 1 tM 4E t flk1JI6. 1 PUT i ! iths SPADE, ('VE rou SoI E - 111-ifier t Fen. t cAg 1:29 MD At/6 714-E T1M6 Tb LO. Why do you wish to become a Commission Member?/ -i -A JCE MY .19e72. A N o per. &gote71-t ASI c -o &IV SoM6 11 N% 0M'1 7l ASI � J t3 -la Tr(6 commu,l i . What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? I�NDCA- Ail off g(04 A-otlis.0 City CotA li roger L S or. LA .1D L A-614 R ANI N I ♦,iG. 1 Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes x No (If yes, please list) 1 Is AtYS Po55, 1- Evoc, &IN& rrJ A &sib CW581. ?rIAT A CaJFUq- CCu c,p Al 01 1612.5 A ^I A-PPC1c,4 J -r IS ci' 4ouCTCr tati. ayMy FI1�J✓I — Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past '"'activities 'and other experience` that you—feel 'would qualify you as a Commission member. -1,0y0146. MA-fLit,40 VAT (,UJ (V . LAC,. C.401t.,� .tUrz- - RCE 41043 V• P / D! el P120. ` MCTrz - 1iTt4 w Esr, rbc . - 4o/Z774y-I DGG-, CA — 5.0 P170,. P1 -for VT7J . -fir 5 vers.as acc . 0)/ firm -fir5Vz 9r5. ku'd wordna& 1 OF -h pkukiA4.1.3 process. g -r > Ji of ilEgMOSA L — 6+ y yes - FAMi t,' . op f;.. OR/ (MAt.I - 24 + 61LS -- This Commission meets on i 5°' 7UES at % p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes )( No How long havyou + lived in Hermosa Beach? . e.5 — Ml `s 'u- LLY�� 4.�D 7r T b6ci dG 0 7D P ecN-A-5 t-omc ZtG Mos _ LAT . . Comments: 6/5/91 2 Name: THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL NAME OF COMMISSION 4,7£ "-Z— Address: f'.r--Z S S�P�74 744 i FEB 121991 u City Clerk City of Hermosa Beach COMM` S,5 I ON d� \. • h Home Phone 377"1,‘9 Occupation cs Profession: Name of Employer :2d Address of Employer: ZoZ/ REFERENCES: 4Soc k7/v /vzc2r� y .5-7/ 7z' Loca 1: T;`/ .%dvA— • ' i. G '/ , 2,Z Business Phone 2:5-‘-77(10 Professional: 1kis Other: WC COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE: (.Sacco 4 dco 74,i) Z.- X c4., i//oov8_ (;)2i1 -,IA , " Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? ‘2.`4-t 0:1 - /,4{ 0 Csa) m (/4 J_/ / 6 7 lit oje _ A . What do you feel are ko U«C'z the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Member? What are your present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations'? 'o -d 0tvsc/f4s 1 Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? NG Please give #.resume fo.your education, -employment, past -activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. G( S This Commission meets on �icFSf/43 at 3, P.M. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? NQ How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? lFyds Comments: 2--7�C�i /G Z �'l,o,, a �J(ice (�3 / Toe � E ,1;7/4 2�Y��i Signed: Date: 2-//- 7/ Received: L(} 8 ACE! THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AUG 191991 cm), Clerk �< APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMI' - OprtswHermoia8aach • NAME OF COMMISSION TLANNITIC,' Name: rbA1..E �OW� CKI • asp Address: 414 SMD csr , 2_2-1 Home. Phone: 214 -2-7 f3 . Occupation 'or Profession: L. A. �E'o r' S1 -1E 2l rF Name of Employer: Los r4NGE. s CONN';`( Bus. Phone:(Z13) g 74.4q? Address of Employer: �{ 1 1 gvL4{ET . i 1_.,, C10012_ REFERENCES: Local: TM V.onLsl-J-YAR, 41s- Hr- oNDo, N.3. 318-5-y3C Professional: -PAVL (/-RELLA , 41) BAVc t -V , L . A . (S)(q3'S 976-3 Other: 1)01/4.3q Si-ove r 376 - 20 16 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): / 917- 000_44",/ '.e) co it'i vn-y-10()Tr1 Socc LeRGOE /N Tv`c00 0 t 1990 -t:4. coo4TY 5ht iF-Fs SAVE. rv,JDPAlsiN; /ton, oRA/lior rZ 14,1- .4_ CoiVT' Sffc2/ F,C 's 'TEe..6r140,4 vP_C,44 .?/Nt-, Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? To APPLY itiy JttA 1QJ ‘NI QO ILLI C N ST R- otv Tp TZ'-lr" aAowrh cD.F • `4- ?PoresS)ONr‘L LXp IS Hr`s EDJC.r�Trl,N w\LL Q PAST -'t Tt1c P�'9^r`INt.S� lLt� i cvE GMAT c,raS cc?.,,nMk. sSior' END (40NL cF '54146 C- rr( . What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission member? G60?klnt(, OJ i (,S 'T144 -r- NECD ;a OQ-rf�t,SE THOSE T?f1fo S Sic NC 6 N11, its M EittCAS 909_ DcyvJc l Ev % rn CO vv Pel S i+ THE Col=t -S oc 'n*E LtTY, iD eeScAO-C4+ itrt t D t\o/Ise c.sry Cootssc ON --r 56: (51/4'c_5 DIp_,CTN`( P-€CATC-0 -0 2ON1M4‘ LA/4)-0Se,}A14O Cori «i - 1 - p rzoTEcTS Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes X No (If yes, please list) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past 3 -activities and other experience that -you -feel would qualify you as a Commission member. (`(1m, la -Te 2s bcEc e tN Pk) A -b N kiN S P_ - V S,C . SPECtAU lM14 \N Ft M P r)C pc Ttie PV 8Ltc SeCTaSZ _ 19 $6 - 1 ` r1 - 0 Pct A-TtoNl& Prt•Y4 —rn�� N C oFf ►c` P -QS. 8320 c t trs 1Z - elAITTa Lt Oto Ig - lQ,?6 U -s . A-P_-Nti.Y I NsF/1Niy r -c ycE2 , PIA-Tco (4 LE-A-Dea / Coyt*I4N1 c.^A0R. y2ESPONI(;LE Fort_ 1-14.E \34( I TQA-1N(Nti A -r3 sopezvrtst,.') 6E - n At -t- Suf a0tN�z'ci AND 3uflGe1-A ( V-esPOtJS�iL1TtC:S 't 8 - . S, r nN ('gi m ley C.E ; (),,J i v OF 7Z 4.606 1 C -161411 L4. DC VT-( 5t-5fLtFF - SvPN:(LVts(t3C, r_ UST ) vtsto(NI This Commission meets on /511-1; 3ri� 10e,SDAT at / p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes )(No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? YEAle.S Comments : 4SLTItoce/f to,/ IWD ryt Nov/C/,P,q-L EXP5 /FAJCE / 6&L-IEVE ' Y 2E6EtiT G 241 ()tyre:- cOuC, -77c •v ,a1►.3� S&NSE aF Cf (/IC D VT y Al Ate ME N //3c rL- CANS/, F ,Q A- Posf77ON c 1V rinc PL/fsJN1AT cor+-in'#ss/OAJ Signed 17- 492.e' 1 Date: 0,5-/ 7- 9/ 6/5/91 THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMISSION NAME OF COMMISSION PL/4AV/ATC- co /-o4i ,S S/bi1/4) Name: A 1, saE 1.) Si Home Phone: 37? - 5 ` Address: 1108 a�D n i 14 M os/4- Occupation s,4 - Occupation or Profession: $t(5//J c55 C, SULLY/)-�J 1 Name of Employer: 5E LF Address of Employer: Bus. Phone: s•A-A REFERENCES: Local: &fe✓ M14-/BG-hc, P Yf-3/6-171/ Professional: VE -1?) F. -k t�esc 'f/5 9yc1- Y3 7 e2 X08-988-6460 Other: /-f ERRS CSLA/j.6 71'-} - S9 - nfz�1 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present):. 56R ✓/CE --boil/- 5P -T /i enc PIJ NA/iiir� e- (HK,S5St J 145p -i --)Ars d -4f /ssvcs Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? ,.1 , -OE 3a f err-- A h29LP /71- £ . el/mit/4,g-- /A/ 4- i .e_Pd�. Li '641 ,t1 tm Ater C What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of Commission member? /14577b—AC7a — ,' B&ics e: 0 is 4 -.Ari 77'Y en -c ,e/Le /.r r 77 Ci2e, Aul) Cil Do you have any current obligations or responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes )<, No (If yes, please list) Please give a resume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience -that you -feel would qualify you as a Commission member. B. 5c. uS7j'L )lo/'r Gl .I L -L,' fd/S; / ?6/. - 30 t 4,51 -RS P &f cam. I4-7 ,g'e7771- fO,DS /9-7J /-0 �/�-(5J eXs S ,?J J)A �H /SS / a).J S Fee_ 1.18iG/ N L erg-- P°d)2 T4-T7 &A1 S C4,7•-( H r F ta/APb ticTh.R1C/L' P1/4-77CP4-1/63.0 4-S %4- "c/V/L/,Y,) /,J 7 Pu ,v�.✓� rP -1- fiq I CS/ c e& S S / R 1/�-yS%4-- C 4 This Commission meets on 77/ bil--Y at 7 p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? ?e), �,� -.S 6„.1 eyr4C Comments: C/2- Y79-19 /.16-) .%J7 4-de 4- Ce''`) .7-k-)1-(- 77/67— ; )1 n� rte/.rev i /9Ar1j -x' &4-70‘17 AT< i SS/46) /s 4- V2 7-4-zz— 69,27 F ,e.yag S S Signed: Date: ESoac), 2 6/5/91 • 'f Name: THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL COMMI NAME OF COMMISSION \. s City Clerk Orh of Hermosa Beach ^,% Home Phone 37 4 - (?2 : „ .5feve Pi A. S ua. rd Address: 343 � f�lF., Sfio.And � Alerinasld- 13eOc% ) CA. 902S,L Occupation or Profession: /rope r�y ,to4je tex* Name of Employer: Se/f, egsbury Pro-,erf eS Address of Employer: .� SO SS W. o s�rL , 4. Business Phone 3W -5W3 REFERENCES: Local: i,y W;///ahiy (Z/3.) 37C/- 64/4, 376- x'996 (,,,,) Professional: £e, , e/mail 6'cce1,.Ja•.+) 385- 600S- Other: 00, Other: Sco(1 �rlednch 3`76- '0)66 _. _9 - COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE: "nlinii}h &cicX P.71- 5Aoc✓ CoeiS1 A i �-i;1� 5&,wf Fur, f get./d 1/ay/.14, Z-ZArMa/4Eivf �f�rend r 10/Pi Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? S tre. y e.)(� r me. v ih r•„ Irl 0h1 OSS ccre_ a1/sectors - re, rrse-ahcX // COh tjr e_r,Cte.S /-facTors are, �Zeh. /vrTo aceDutitInL 7Onirj ec/s/o/s) -fro +� -i-c;4..,A•1f1 A�cS cc+:HA,erc aj. /flaintQln t►itelrity OT i11� eik--eQ What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commission Member? 11 aCC tr,r ,�lv (eflec.f Hie J es/res' o -P 94e- cement". ZG�hlltq ke Ll/Yehien-6 l i!i-/ ark .-Far '/ pr'ae//caan] eni]QiiC'/11 What are your, present civil, fraternal or professional memberships and obligations)? I ‘4// ,toe_( ,cd / r'►/D,,,e©r.:hersAso 6;a/Lioe- Pre smieirfr 4) /kiwi/ S() -e -fl.. F444-' — Cele -14.1 her Cillee-.64'ws 4h -71/11. r5+ Pry even,�� p e✓e,r hitr,berd 17101171 J J Do you have any concurrent obligations and responsibilities which could be construed as a conflict of interests? If so, what are they? 0 m less fro rer`ty �Whersi, ►� u41/ - les 4S a_ e_oh`F/cr 41-es7. --Please give 'a --resume "fo your -education employment, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. UCZ-ig UCS8 ted.CA/;Ijill 6 I. (187. heid' o- 1 l'Tl ,F vhah i" ser/;es ✓7et7L 1 l 0 ■ Lc 0"T %• rQrn_Tide dt'!7 ' Uro rani /Tha/ Si£4h a he Vhano• e_ esru�� il1ana eme;/ CL.hd %nveS7`neiv L C.Q`n /i"D resilepue' /h 11(90'3 (ne- a e,onalo si^.5le 4.t....',iy ,, h.c( t-•,kpii wn;f, - This Commission meets on icer at • h.14naqe. Lp►nmere) r w res« P.M. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? A ex.cet,11 ino 44/ eve- e 'erl d?r How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? Comments: Seve- ye.4 rs Signed : Date: 2/18A/ Received: Name: A. �?y. Crilli I ? s'� 0 THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH £4 ''� ''A r AUQ 19 ,-- APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO MUNICIPAL CO 1 ISION r, 199 -I city �' Cterli 9 �� h or Hermosa BsecA' . NAME OF COMMISSION iLA)f0) )4 COMA 1 'it &i\\-(.. 141,1)A t/Fi ... , .Home Phone: `20f 3-330 (oaf t ai tk t' &E I 'r1t11t 3 - AGN Address: Occupation br Profession: Name of Employer: SELF- itftlVizyeo Address of Employer: Bus . Phone: D/3-.) _5555 3346 6GE161 PPRx, gvn, ST'E ill 1 SIANTii )~i1►P S REFERENCES: Local: l,. R.UW1f ry TkJ11k\ 37z-8311 Professional,: (j R. JVQjfj SII 1y ' (3)3) 4-55S) ARRh, 1Z 'rS (51 33 Other: COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND SERVICE (past and present): p) Mx) riO ►ws Ali To e m)noiklii '; Why do you wish to become a Commission Member? fo WEEo) A`VE Aj k C Th i G � A1C What do you feel are the duties and responsibilities of a Commissibn member? t,1 11 .1a► 4 C1 it hk 1 A'S di ._ CA i s i1 J di' ICA f, L . 4 t' ti( ► Il ,: 1 r1� I. Do you have any current obligations or responsibXlities which could be construed as a conflict of interest? Yes No (If yes, please list) '' Please,,give_aresume of your education, employment, memberships, past activities and other experience that you feel would qualify you as a Commission member. -at-CO2 i 1Ai0S, UI\11 V v 6= 0441 lel R.0'rt- tsrr t #toilkEsS 6R,Rcri E til 66. mu )t tgtl- PRS rEav(' - owns etc . f A-E f entre (4JQTL( - unsfn K2t, E IXDILIXJ This Commission meets on at p.m. Do you foresee any scheduling problems that might make you miss meetings? Yes r/ No How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach? krTTQ ( /kms Comments: 6/5/91 Michael Stifano 1704 Loma Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 12 September 1991 The City Council Hermosa Beach City Hall 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Sirs and Madame, Clty City of HermosaCferk Haaeh / 'cor P7:01 This letter is to confirm our earlier communications as well as to ask for information regarding the meeting which you have requested with me. On Monday afternoon, 9 September 1991, I received a phone call from Naoma in the City Clerk's office saying that the City Council had requested to meet with me on Thursday, 19 September 1991, and asking me to please call her back to confirm the meeting. I called her -back and told, her that I have previous plans which make it impossible for me to be available for nine days starting on 18 September and asked if we could reschedule the meeting. She said that she was simply asked to relay the message and that only the City Council could reschedule the meeting. She suggested that I get in touch with Mayor Midstokke to work out a new meeting time. I called Mayor Midstokke and left a message that I would not be available for the meeting on the 19th and would she please return my call so we could arrange a time compatible with everyone. Since the Mayor did not return my phone call I decided to go to the City Council meeting on 10 September 1991 and, since everyone would be there, inform them in person that I had a conflict with the request and arrange a different time. The council suggested that the meeting be changed to the date of the next regular council meeting and the City Manager said that I would receive a letter with the requested time and date of the proposed meeting. I did not have a calendar with me at the time and said that I would inform you if I could not make the meeting. 1 Ob I am not available for a meeting until after 1 October 1991. This is because of my previously stated personal engagement and because of the Planning Commission meeting on that date. I have spoken with the Naoma in the City Clerk's office again and she said that it would probably have to wait until 8 October. That date is fine with me and if it fits into your schedule, please let me know as soon as possible to confirm it. Also while I was at the City Council meeting, I asked what the subject of the meeting would be so that I could properly prepare. At that time I was told that the City Council would be asking me about my philosophies concerning the Conditional Use Permit process and about my position as a Planning Commissioner. In your letter confirming the time and date of the meeting, please include a proposed specific agenda of the meeting, the reason for requesting the meeting, and, if it will not be an open meeting of the City Council, what form the meeting will take and a complete list of people who will be there. Thank you for your time. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Michael Stifano HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT . MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1991 ;August OFFENSES REPORTED This Month This Month one Year Ago Year to Date Last Year �.—.To Date Murder 0 0 _ 0 0 Rape 0 0 2 1 Robbery 3 3 26 17 Assault 16 11 100 77 Burglary 18 30 214 240 Larceny- 57 41 439 346 Motor Vehicle Theft 12 a___,__..____.__.__ DUI 28 9 1 1 1 85 39 265 .---------___-- 283 A11 Other Offenses 1 431 359 2544 2886 Disturbance Calls 407 271 2265 2269 1 1 PERSONS ARRESTED Adults 1071 119 868 945 Juveniles 01 0 + I 4 1 Criminal Citations 921 Bicycle/SKateboard Cites 41 178 658 1326 14 54 51 ;TRAFFIC REPORT ACCIDENTS Fatal — 0 0 10 2 0 84 73 Injury 121 3-1-1- Property Damage Only 36 259 165 CITATIONS 294 15i 4254 148 Traffic ----- 481 33 -------1- 3023 100 Parking 1 Total Calls CALLS FOR SERVICE 2491T 2813 21395 24516 *** indicates information unavailable . 1 4 71Noted: Res - fully 5 smi ted, _ �llil�1 --i- Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Steve 5. Wisniewski, Director of Public Safety HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1991 August =,r.rrr ti —1 H VI 1 L1•VLV 1.1.! WIN I LV' This Month This Month ' Year to Date ! Last Year rt One Year Ago ! To Date 0' 0! 0! 0 Murder Rape -- ---- u 01 3' 3f 26i 2 I 17 Robbery Assault 161 1 1 I 1001 77 Burglary 18t 301 57! 41 12! 2141 240 4391 346 91 1 1 1; 85 Larceny Motor Vehicle Theft DUI 28i 391 2651 283 A11 Other Offenses 431' 3591 2544! 2886 Disturbance Calls 407: 271: 22651 2269 PERSONS ARRESTED f 1 107- 119' 8681 945 Adults = Juven i les O 01 4; 1 Criminal Citations J. 92' 178' 658; 4! 1326 Bicycle/Skateboard cites 14i 51 . TRAFFIC REPORT' ACCIDENTS Fatal 0 0 2' 0 Injury 121 101 841- 73 Property Damage Only 36 361 259 165 CITATIONS ` T Traffic 29;lt 4811 3023 15!331 100 4254 Parking 148 CALLS FOR SERVICE Total Calls 2491 2813 21395 24516 *** indicates information unavailable t , r flies fully S mi ted, Noted: .Steve S. Wisniewski, Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Director of Public Safety HERMOSA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT .____.. MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1991 7 -August • t. —i OFFENSESREPORTED! ' ; ! This Month 1 This Month ! Year to Date 1 Last Year - 0 . T One Year Ago ; 01 , f-- ; To Date 0; Murder 0! Rape 0! ' 0!. 31 2 261 1 17 Robbery ' 7; ,.); Assault 16' 111 100 77 Burglary 18 301 41 91 2141 4391 1111 240 346 85 Larceny 57; 12! Motor Vehicle Theft DUI 281 43 1 ! 3912651 359 2544! 283 2886 All Other Offenses : Disturbance Calls . 407; 271!2265 2269 _ 7 PERSONS ARRESTED 107! 1191 oi 178' 1 , 8681 41 6581 945 i 1326 __ Adults Juveniles oi 92! Criminal Citations, : Bicycle/Skateboard Cites 4't 141 541 51 1 1 :TRAFFIC REPORT! ACCIDENTS ._,_ Fatal 0 i 0 2 0 Injury ' 121 10 84 73 Property Damage Only 36; 36 259 165 CITATIONS 1 , 4254 148 Traffic 2941 151 481 33 3023 100 Parking —t— • CALLS FOR SERVICE Total Calls 2491, 2813 21395 24516 *** indicates information unavailable -1 , ; . Noted: S Res!! fully 0 l'ilikv _ . S -111 smi ted, . . ! . Kevin B. Northcraft, City Manager Steve S. Wisniewski, . Director of Public Safety Honorable Mayor and Memberd'of the City Council ACTIVITY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY AUGUST,1991 September 15, 1991 Attached for your information are recap sheets of department activity for the month of August. Overall permit activity decreased slightly in August as the department is- sued 62 permits of which 26 were building permits. Two permits were issued for single family dwellings and two permits were issued for detached condo- minium units. Fifteen permits were issued for alterations or additions to existing dwellings and six permits were issued for alterations to commer- cial buildings. Two dwelling units were demolished resulting in a net in- crease of two dwelling units to the housing inventory. The department also processed sixty-four plans for zoning review, plan check or revisions. Plan processing "turn around" averaged one week during August. The department conducted 162 inspections during August not includ- ing complaint investigations. Building Department general fund revenue for 16.6% of the fiscal year is $74,873.83 or 20.2% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. Total revenue for all funds is $114,129.14. The Business License division reports that 159 licenses were issued during August resulting in revenue of $28,821.00. Business License revenue to date represents 24.8% of projected revenue for the fiscal year. The department logged 17 new code enforcement complaints during August, of which three were for illegal dwelling units. The department closed five cases during August and currently has twenty-nine illegal dwelling unit cases under investigation. The August report on recycling participation levels and refuse diversion is attached to this report. The report indicates that the participation level (at least one recyclable item set out) averaged 70.76% in August. The par- ticipation level has averaged over 70% since the program was implemented. The total volume of recyclable materials collected in August totaled 325,773 pounds (162.89 tons) and represents a diversion of 22.71% of the residential refuse that would otherwise likely end up in a landfill. In three months of operation, the program has collected over one million pounds of recyclable material. Noted: Kevin B. Northc ft Respectfu y Submitted, �j�/C'.� _til yr �-/t-f'►-2_ William Grove Director, Bldg. & Safety CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REVENUE REPORT Month of AUGUST 1991 NUMBER OF THIS MONTH FY TO LAST FY PERMITS CURRENT MONTH LAST FY DATE TO DATE Building 26 41 55 66 Plumbing 20 36 44 50 Electric 16 14 40 27 Plan Check 18 25 43 42 Sewer Use 1 3 2 4 Res. Bldg. Reports 15 19 30 29 Comm. Inspections' 20 36 40 80 Parks & Recreation 0 0 2 0 In lieu Park & Rec. 2 4 4 5 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 0 Sign Review 5 5 10 13 Fire Flow Fees 6 11 12 16 Legal Determination 0 - 0 - Zoning Appeals 0 - 0 - TOTALS 129 194 282 332. FEES Building** 26,755.27 22,630.04 38,520.51 32,720.12 Plumbing 1,466.00 2,353.00 2,970.00 3,437.00 Electric 1,409.00 1,462.00 3,507.00 3,592.00 Plan Check 6,834.75 6,623.50 26,276.32 21,558.32 Sewer Use 342.54 1,649.64 901.47 1,992.18 Res. Bldg. Reports 600.00 720.00 1,200.00 1,120.00 Comm. Inspections 800.00 850.00 1,600.00 1,950.00 Parks & Recreation 0 0 7,000.00 0 In lieu Park & Rec. 10,396.00 34,320.00 18,976.00 42,900.00 Board of Appeals 0 0 0 0 Sign Review 400.00 125.00 800.00 300.00 Fire Flow Fees 6,292.59 23,588.24 12,377.84 30,455.24 Legal Determination 0 - 0 - Zoning Appeals 0 - 0 - TOTALS 55,296.15 94,321.42 114,129.14 140,024.86 VALUATIONS 1,242,735 2,241,512 2,342,706 3,216,900 **Includes State Seismic Fee $134.94 Revenue: Licenses issued: BUSINESS LICENSE MONTHLY REPORT 28,821.00 30,718.00 159 125 112,198.77 68,212.79 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Month of AUGUST 1991 TYPE OF STRUCTURE DWELLING UNITS PERMITS PROVIDED VALUATION 1. Single Dwellings 2 2 709,000 2. Duplex Dwellings 3. Triplex Dwellings 4. Four Units or More 5. Condominiums 2 2 322,000 6. Commercial Buildings 7. Industrial Buildings 8. Publicly Owned Buildings 9. Garages - Residential 10. Accessory Buildings 11. Fences and Walls 12. Swimming Pools 13. Alterations, additions or repairs to dwellings 15 114,735 14. Alterations, additions or repairs to Commercial Bldgs. 6 97,000 15. Alterations, additions or repairs to indus. bldgs. 16. Alterations, additions or repairs to publicly owned bldgs. 17. Alterations, additions, repairs to garages or accessory bldgs. 18. Signs 19. Dwelling units moved 20. Dwelling units demolished 2 -2 21. All other permits not listed TOTAL PERMITS 27 TOTAL VALUATION OF ALL PERMITS: 1,242,735 ** TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED : 4 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS DEMOLISHED: 2 NET CHANGE: +2 NET DWELLING UNIT CHANGE FY 91/92 +2 CUMULATIVE DWELLING UNIT TOTAL: 9,685 (INCLUDES PERMITS ISSUED) ** Revised figure based on land use study by the Planning Dept. City of Hermosa Beach RecycleNOW Report August 1991 Residential Participation Volume/Pounds of Recyclable Materials Trastyydwst. Total ONP/ Comml. % Div. Tons Lbs. Mored Glass lin Alum. PET HDPE Mixed Waste/tns Date Rate Actual Max. 8/1 72.86% 1,138 1,562 21.35% 40.16 21,800 14,570 5,661 607 253 239 246 224 8/5 65.55% 1,195 1,823 19.69% 41.90 20,540 15,420 3,870 492 189 123 282 164 8/6 68.16% 1,109 1,627 20.41% 38.80 19,892 14,729 3,557 583 222 202 310 289 8/7 76.95% 1,152 1,497 20.11% 36.47 18,362 13,597 3,607 410 195 124 257 172 8/8 71.77% 1,121 1,562 20.09% 38.02 19,127 14,163 4,016 363 139 94 233 119 8/12 65.00% 1,185 1,823 19.46% 36.14 17,460 13,030 3,398 408 173 123 182 146 8/13 69.08% 1,124 1,627 21.99% 33.46 18,850 13,520 4,317 458 165 102 149 139 8/14 76.55% 1,146 1,497 25.42% 31.45 21,442 15,406 4,931 416 187 86 247 169 8/15 72.28% 1,129 1,562 25.12% 32.79 22,008 15,714 4,872 510 257 139 296 220 8/19 64.67% 1,179 1,823 25.39% 25.33 17,236 12,919 3,264 414 160 104 237 138 8/20 70.87% 1,153 1,627 26.11% 23.46 16,573 12,422 3,250 349 1451 137 141 129 8/21 76.09% 1,139 1,497 26.72% 22.05 16,076 12,049 2,775 455 173 157 242 225 8/22 72.54% 1,133 1,562 26.29% 22.99 16,407 12,298 3,111 353 168 107 222 148 8/26 64.78% 1,181 1,823 23.68% 35.45 21,990 16,780 4,215 380 146 99 245 125 8/27 70.56% 1,148 1,627 24.01% 32.82 20,730 15,490 4,244 451 162 100 147 136 8/28 77.35% 1,158 1,497 23.16% 30.85 18,600 13,680 3,774 453 192 137 202 162 8/29 72.79% 1,137 1,562 22.51% 32.16 16,680 14,190 3,475 364 184 99 211 157 Totals: 70.76% 19,527 27,598 22.71% 554.30 Breakdown of 717.19 tons of Residential refuse: 77.29% Breakdown of 1,463.45 tons of total City refuse: 37.88% 325,773 239,977 66,337 7,466 3,110 2,172 3,849 2,862 746.26 Breakdown of 162.89 tons (325,773 lbs) of recyclables: 100% 73.67% 20.37% 2.29% .95% .67% 1.18% .88% Breakdown of 717.19 tons of residential refuse: 2271% 16.73% 4.62% .52% .22% .15% .27% .20% Breakdown of 1463.45 tons of city refuse: 11.13% 8.20% 2.27% .26% .11% .07% .13% .10% 50.99% Average weekly volume of city refuse: 344.34 tons: Commercial 175.59 tons Residential 130.42 tons Recycling 38.33 tons Month June July August Rate 70.40% 70.68% 70.76% YTD Ave. 70.62 . ONP/Mixed Tons Red. Value Total Dollars Commingled Tons Red. Value Total Dollars June Residential Participation Actual 18,330 21,898 19,527 117.81 $15.00/ton $1,767.15 40.22 $40.00/ton $1,608.80 Total Redemption $ $3,375.05 19,918 Max. 26,036 30,983 27,598 28,206 % Div. 23.07% 23.18% 22.71% 2299% JCC 149.09 119.99 $15.00/ton $15.00/ton $2,236.35 $1,799.85 42.31 42.90 $40.00/ton $40.00/ton $1,692.40 $1,719.60 $3,928.75 $3,517.45 City of Hermosa Beach Recycle Now Summary Report Trash/ydwst. Tons 527.10 634.34 554.30 Volume/Pounds of Recyclable Materials Total ONP/ Lbs. Mixed Glass lin 316,050 382,792 325,773 235,610 298,180 239,977 63,489 65,059 66,337 Comm!. Citywide Alum. PET HDPE Mixed Waste/tns % Diversion 6,202 2,565 1,375 2,804 2,018 593.32 7,418 3,092 2,153 3,949 2,941 802.23 7,466 3,110 2,172 3,849 2,862 746.26 571.91 341,538 257,922 64,962 7,029 Redemption Dollars Received Sept Oct Nov Dec 12.36% 11.76% 11.13% 2,922 1,900 3,534 2,607 713.94 11.72% Jan Feb March HERMOSA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 19911 Aug 31, 19911 FIRE STATISTICS This Month This Month Year to Date Last Year , One Year Ago To Date Total Calls 55 70 454 560 (types) False Alarms 1 9 26 56 Mutual Aid 2 0 5 12 Paramedic assists 30 31 235 275 Residence Fire 2 5 25 41 Commercial Fire 5 1 24 18 Vehicle Fire 2 1 19 13 Hazardous Mtls. 3 4 28 38 Other 10 19 92 107 PARAMEDIC STATISTICS Total Responses 77 88 618 702 (types) No Patient/aid 10 6 50 66 Medical 29 38 241 285 Trauma 38 44 307 380 Auto Accident 18 19 131 128 Assault 9 10 61 72 Jail Call 2 7 35 38 Transports 42 45 270 352 Base Hosp. Con. 20 20 193 285 Trauma Center 3 0 9 12 w/o R-11 3 STRAND AND BEACH CALLS Medical only 2 2 12 54 Ocean Accident 1 2 6 8 Beach Accident 1 1 1 1 Bike v Bike 0 1 0 1 Bike v Ped 0 0 2 0 Fall off Bike 2 2 4 7 Skater v Skater 0 0 0 0 Skater v Ped 0 0 0 0 Fall off Skates 1 1 7 8 Bike/Skater v Other 1 2 4 3 Assault 3 0 5 0 INSPECTIONS and PREVENTION (primary) Commercial 26 50 511 281 Assembly 0 0 3 0 Institutions 1 0 3 10 Industrial 2 0 3 6 Apartments 88 23 412 149 (re—inspections) Commercial 17 60 296 255 Assembly 2 0 2 2 Institutions 1 0 3 5 Industrial 1 0 1 1 Apartments 61 19 324 204 Fumigations 13 6 78 81 Re • ',. 1 Sub it d Note_dr.,, ,� Steve S. Wisnie rki, Kevin B. Northcraft, City pager Director of Public Safety September 11, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council September 24, 1991 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT AUGUST ACTIVITY REPORT Attended AQMD Regulation XV annual certificate update training. Recruited for Interim Public Works Director. Continued negotiations with the Teamsters Union, Local 911. Current This Month FY to Last FY to STATISTICAL SECTION: Month Last Year Date to Date Worker Comp Claims: Claims Opened 6 3 17 6 Claims Closed 2 1 16 8 Total Open 79 64 79 64 Lost Time (Manhours) Safety 387 * 597 * Non -safety 515 * 1,035 * Liability Claims: Claims opened 7 3 12 8 Claims closed 0 3 2 8 Total open 49 32 49 32 Employee Involved Vehicle Accidents: Safety 0 * 2 Non -safety 0 * 1 Employee Turnover: Safety 0 * 0 Non -safety 0 * 0 * * * * * Information not maintained in this format last fiscal year. General Appropriations Secretary: The following summary indicates the amount of time spent on each of the assigned functions: August: 170 hours available Word Processing 79% (134 hrs) Avg. 7.89 hrs/day Mail Processing Directory/Dept Support 7% (12 hrs) 14% (24 hrs) Avg. .70 hr day Avg. 1.41 hrs/day Word Processing Services by Department: Finance 21% (28 hrs) Public Works: 37% (50 hrs) City Manager: 9% (12 hrs) Personnel 27% (36 hrs) Planning 6% ( 8 hrs) Respectfully Submitted, Noted: ,441.4 I ,y-W�+dic Robert A. Blackwood, Director Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Personnel and Risk Management pers/act HONORABLE MAYOR AND IYIEMYIBERS of the HERMO Sri, BEACH CITY COUNCIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT AUGUST. 1991 STAFF REPORTS PREPARED September 18, 1991 Regular Meeting of September 24, 1991 MEETINGS / SEMINARS I MEETINGS 30 22 66 I 52 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES INSPECTIONS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST FY FY TO DATE LAST FY TO DATE APPEAL / CITY COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION 1 0 2 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CONDO) 1 0 1 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (COMMERCIAL) -4 2 4 3 CONDITION AL OSE PERMIT AMENDMENT 0 4 0 5 CJIJDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION 1 0 2 + 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ MAP EXTENSION 0 0 2 0 EN`:IR014MENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 0 0 0 FINAL MAP 0 2 3 7 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 7 0 17 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 0 NONCONFORMING REMODEL 2 0 3 0 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0 0 0 0 P.AR.K.ING PLAN 0 3 0 3, SPECIAL STUDY 0 0 2 0 SUBDIVISION 1 2 1 2 TEXT AMENDMENT 0 2 1 3 , m t i,d,I , . 1 1 1 !x'11 0 J O vARIANCE 0 0 0 0 ZONE CHANGE 0 11 0 16 MISCELLANEOUS 6 1 8 5 MEETINGS / SEMINARS I MEETINGS 30 22 66 I 52 CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES INSPECTIONS 11 38 30 19^ 24 74 i 39 rI�NITIAL 1 f OLL 1W UP INSPECTIONS 8 I LETTERS GENERATED 40 70 57 101 MEMOS GENERATED 4 5 8 7 I C. U.P. ACCEPTANCE FORMS RECEIVED 4 0 7 u j C,U,P. COVENANT FORMS GENERATED 2 0 17 0 C.U.P COVENANT FORMS RECEIVED Ij 4 0 13 0 CITATI0N3 ISSUED 0 0 0 0 C.U.P. VIOLATIONS ABATED 9 0 28 0 WAVE DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP THIS MONTH THIS MONTH FY LAST FY I ro DATE LAFT FY TO DATE 1 HERMu5A 6EALH PA5SEN0iER.3 2446 1 123 4093 1 2207 � REDCND BEACH P"SSEN6ERE -" 42 4756 14377 9409 I SA rELll TE NASSENoERS 396 362 749 1 bb4 1 BEAUH RVU T t 1 MUNICIPAL AREA EXPRESS (MAX) RIDERSHIP 1 696 1344 3300 1 2455 BUDGET (FOR 16Z OF FY) 1ExPEND1 rURE (COMPARE TO BUDbET ETIMATE) I :REVENUE (COMPARE TO BUDGET ESTIMATE) 14S - 35n f 4S- 35n.L 30S- 1 25%- I The Following Activities Were Undertaken for Transit Projects 1. Routine tasks. Upcoming Agenda Items to City Council 1. Text amendment to require relocation impact reports !RIR) for displacement of mobilehomes. Long Term Projects Underway 1. Recovering permit authority from Coastal Commission. 2, Updating zoning ordinance for compliance with current law, clarification of intent, and procedural correctness. 3. Finalizing process for oil drilling. 4. Updating Land Use Element and other General Plan Elements. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director NOTED: Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager Respectfully submitted, �Yu-Ying Ting Administrative Aide pc/activity ti. September 17, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of of the City Council-- September 24, 1991 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AUGUST, 1991 ACTIVITY REPORT The Department of Community Resources has been involved in the following activities for the month of August. RECREATION PROGRAMMING August 7 - Over 60 youths competed in tug-of-war, relays, and water balloon games in "Youth Field Day". Prizes from "Penguins", "Burger King" and "Chicago for Ribs" were awarded as well as ribbons and certificates to all who participated. August 10 and 11 - The first Hermosa Beach Doubles Tennis Challenge attracted 38 teams. A highly enthusiastic group played in a unique double elimination tournament with nine catagories. T-shirts were given to each player and _`trophies were awarded to 1st and 2nd place teams. See attached photo. August 12 - Three one-week sessions for "Corky Bell's Sport Camp were offered to youth ages 9-14. Corky Bell and his guest coaches taught the fundamental skills of basketball, baseball and soccer to 50 participants. Each session ended with an excursion to the beach for surfing, bodyboarding and safety instruction as well as volleyball. August 16 - The first Youth Fun Tennis Challenge was held on the Community Center Courts. Kids from the area challenged one another for fun prizes. Everyone was a winner. August 17 and 18 - Our first Hermosa Beach Grass Volleyball Tournament was held at Hermosa Valley Park. A total of 63 teams participated in men's, women's and co-ed catagories of open, "A" and novice divisions. A variety of prizes were awarded. See attached pictures. August 21 - The Hermosa Beach Children's Theatre workshop presented "Peter Pan" in the Civic Theatre. The hard work by the young people was rewarded by friends and family who enjoyed the largest production undertaken by the company to date. Flyers were distributed to Hermosa Beach employees for the Summer Recreation Lawnbowling tournament scheduled to start September 10th, 1991. SPECIAL EVENTS The annual International Surf Festival was held August 2, 3, and 4. Hermosa Beach hosted the Fishing Derby in which 61 anglers tried their luck . Torrance Memorial Medical Center presented their annual wellness fair on the Hermosa Beach Pier. The public was invited to free screenings of skin cancer and sports injuries as well as information on beach safety and cholesterol levels. The men's USA championship pro volleyball tournament energized the pier courts on Friday and Saturday, August 23rd and 24th. This year's finals were broadcast live, nationwide by NBC. Crowd estimates for the weekend were approximatly 40,000. The Hermosa Beach police officers supervised the event and reported a well organized smoothly run tournament. See attached photo. MEETINGS August 9 - Staff met with representatives of AVP, Hermosa Beach Police and Hermosa Beach General Services to plan the logistics involved in the up coming men's pro volleyball tournament. August 15 - Staff attended a CPRS meeting, on "Recreation Class Programming". Information was shared among neighboring cities on instructors and policies. August 19 - A Hermosa Beach Community Center Foundation meeting was held at 7:00 pm. Matters discussed included an update for the Andy Narell Concert and pre -concert party on Saturday, September 28 and the upcoming fundraiser "Blast to the Past" on Saturday, October 19. The fundraiser will offer food, dancing, games, an auction and a silent auction. Final details were also discussed on the Fiesta de las Artes in which Foundation Board Members volunteered their time to sell posters and tickets to upcoming events and Community Center Foundation memberships. FILM PERMITS Two film permits were processed and $950 in location and processing fees were collected. OTHER The Hermosa Beach Community Center leases rooms to the Association of Retarded Citizens. Please see attached article regarding their respected program. Facility 8/91 User Hours 8/90 User Hours *Field 52 0 Theatre 99 64 Clark 184 215 Gym 194 147 Room 4 Leased 34 Room 7 0 14 Room 8 116 68 Room 10 98 57 Room 12 112 81 *Field closed for maintenance for one half of month. DEPARTMENT REVENUE Current This month FY Last FY Month Last FY To Date To Date $39,430.50 $22,177.89 $66,563.55 $44,500.18 Revenue Projection: $321,000 Community Resources Department general fund revenue for 17% of the fiscal year is $66,563.55 or 21% of the projected figure. Noted: /10::;;111 Mary C. R••nJO" Director Dept. of oma.unity Resources 1 evin B. Norther City Manager Respectfully submitted, Carol Belser, Recreation Specialist Dept. of Community Resources Ho/we1011W *1)45 iivyst 22_ ler/ • Up and Over Lee Flores, left, and David Counts were working hard at last weekend's Grass Volleyball Tournament in Hermosa Beach. Photo by Shawn Tanaka/Hometown News . • . . . - : • . . • . . ,-j.. • - 7;5: - • ".`,C, HOMETOWN NEWS Thuridag, August 15, 1991 VOL 4 No. 2 ,The Community Newspaper for the People HERNAMEACH Delivered Free.to the Residences hese Hermosa Beach residents had a great time watching the tennis tournament held in their town over the weekend. From left to right they are: Carol Tanner, Gene Carr, Faye Callen, Robin Schiesl, Jane Tumer and Vicki Arrowood. Mow by Shawn Tanaka/Hometown Heimosa News HOMETOWN NEWS August 15,1991 HOMETOWN NEWS reviews • local entertainment A Winning Shot? Hermosa Beach resident Karen Johnson serves during last weekend's Hermosa Beach Tennis Tournament. Photo by Shawn Tanaka/Hometown Hermosa News ara.IJ LsR./AG MONDAY *** September• 9, 1991 r South Bay Business: Culver firm makes it easy for motorists to avoid the DMV/B6 B STEPPING OUT HB center brings new freedom to those with mental retardation By Carol Ryan STAFF WRITER It's another weekday morning et The Galleria at South Bay in Redondo Beach. Young mothers push strollers. and retirees browse store win- dows. In one pan of the mall, tailored employees hurry past an odd assortment of people gathered near a card shop. Vincent Howard is in charge of the group. His eyes move from the shop's glass shelves, filled with delicate Southwest -style ceramics. to the faces of his charges — seven adults with mental retardation. Howard worries about one client's wheelchair. And he worries about 23 -year-old Jesse Aguilar. who sometimes bursts out with obscenities. Be careful. Howard warns Aguilar. Don't break anything. There was a time when Aguilar and the others — adults with the mental capacities of elemen- tary school children — could not take a simple trip to the mall. They might cause a scene or grow violent. It was easier to leave them in the car or not take them at all. Advocates for the Association for Re- t benefits both tarded Citizens - South Bay believe the community that kind of Isola- and the clients tion is outdated. because the more Three years ago, they opened an they're in the adult development Community, the center in Hermosa less fear there is, Beach with a new philosophy: Get cli- the more ents, as the pro- exposure. They gram's participants can be accepted. are called, to live everyday lives. — Judy Seater "Fifty years ago, these people would have been in somebody's closet, literally," said Judy Senter, public relations director for the South Bay association. Public attitudes have changed. Parents no lon- ger shy from bringing a son or daughter with mental retardation to a restaurant. The media follow guidelines to combat stereotypes. A net- work television show, "Life Goes On," stars an actor who has Down's syndrome. It's a lot of work to shepherd adults who need constant supervision — some require help in the bathroom — through the mall, bank or library. But for people who might otherwise spend their days staring at a television, the center's activi- ties keep life interesting. "Some of them live in institutions, most live at home, their folks are older and they don't get out much," said Joy Sydenstricker, program manager at the center. Until the center opened more capable people were grouped with those who have to be fed and RETARDATION/89 Unmet Wynn, a quadriplegic due to cerebral palsy, has his own way of working out math problems. A hug is always a good reason for Rodney Johnson to break from chores. He embraces program manager Joy Sydenstricker. Shopping trips help build self-reliance for Hilda Torres and Jorge de los Rios, clients of the Association for Retarded Citizens center. ream n MOM aamTaa/STAFr rwTo AP" Exercise and physical Ittness are a part of Ufe at the center. Donna Nash. right. joins clients in an aerobics class. WNW Solidus puts In a rim on dishwashing duty after lurch at the — - --- -- cenreG veer h tenches and enmurases self-reliance. Retardation FROM PAGE B1 wear diapers at adult develop- ment centers in Gardena and Rancho Palos Verdes. Now from the Community Center at Pier Avenue and Pa- cific Coast Highway, clients go along on walking trips to the post office, public laundry and bank. They board the beach cit- ies' WAVE buses for trips to the mall, movies or beach. Along the way, neighbors have made friends with the cen- ter's clients. Restaurants invite them in for special meals. The Alano Club, an Alcoholics Anonymous affiliate next to the Community Center, judges works for their annual art show. A fabric store donated yarn, foam and material used for arts and crafts. The welcome makes program organizers ecstatic. It also makes the public more comfort- able with people with mental retardation. "It benefits both the commu- nity and the clients because the more they're in the community, the less fear there is, the more exposure. They can be accept- ed," Senter said.. "With integration, it chips away at the fear." Instructor Angie Schneider hardly noticed glances from passers-by during her group's Galleria visit. She was new. She didn't want any accidents. "This is a little different," Schneider said, her eyes darting among the clients. "This is a chance to see how they act." After stops at the restroom, Howard and Schneider map out a plan. It's about 10:30 a.m. A stroll along the mall's lower lev- el should fill the hour before lunch. Schneider needs to buy a card for her boyfriend. The group follows her into a store. Howard points out gift items and reads cards aloud. The supervisors seem relaxed but vigilant. "They know there are conse- quences if they act differently than they do in school," Schnei- der says. Later, as the group enters the Sharper Image store, one client refuses to join them. Schneider talks to him, but he won't budge. She sends another client out to try her hand. It works. It took time to get clients where they are. They first learned how to follow directions at the center. They got practice doing things for themselves. "Some programs' clients are pampered. Here they expect cli- ents to do a lot of their own work," Senter said. "In this program, they cook, they clean up. It gives them a sense of accomplishment," she said. Emmanuel Silva was typical of many clients upon arriving at the Hermosa Beach center: He could not clear his own lunch tray; he did not know how to sweep the floor. "Some of them couldn't go from this room to the other one because they hadn't been in a program with that kind of flexi- bility," program coordinator Mary Leuci said. On a recent afternoon at the center, supervisor Darlene An- derson coached Silva as he washed his lunch dishes. Put- ting her hands over his, Ander- son showed the 28 -year-old how to clean a spoon. "Turn it over," she said. "Turn the water off. Get your dry -off towel." Clients are now so accus- tomed to cleaning up, they don't know when to quit, Leuci said. "We went to Shakey's for piz- za and salad. They all got up and cleaned and wiped the ta- bles," she said. The 31 clients at the center, whose ages range from 21 to 61 years old, will never hold pay- ing jobs. The goal of the center is to improve the quality- of the client's life, not move them into the work force. But when hands are so twist- ed with palsy they cannot hold a pencil, learning to write one's name is its own reward. Lamont Wynn does every- thing with his mouth. Born in Chicago in 1938 with cerebral palsy, Wynn gets around in a motorize wheelchair activated by a lever he moves with his chin. Give him a pencil to grip in his teeth and he carefully spells out his name on a yellow tablet placed in front of him. "I started college in Chicago in '77. That's where I learned this — Truman College," Wynn said. The college also taught him to type by holding a stick in his mouth and pecking on the keys. Like other clients, Wynn is at the center from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. He returns in the evening to a United Cerebral Palsy group home in Los Angeles. His sis- ters live in Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino, but no one has offered to drive him around town and he has no money to take the bus. For Wynn, the center gets him out to places he might not otherwise go. With the success of the cen-. ter, advocates hope to bring the approach to the South Bay's other two adult development centers. "It's given these clients a lot of confidence. They get a little bit of moxie. They're more sure of what they're doing," Leuci. said. REAL ESTATE LOANS 9.3JUMBO /8 0 APR FIXED 8.1/4% APR FIXED to 191K RAYOR FINANCIAL Mortgage Bankers/Brokers (213) 544 -LOAN (5626) 1■ T.D. Suq.et to Champ OPEN SATURDAYS September 18, 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 24, 1991 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, AUGUST 1991 - User fee schedules were adjusted for the change in the CPI as re- quired by the master fee resolution. The fees increased by 4.6% and are effective 9/1/91. - Reappropriations from the 90/91 Budget were approved by the City Council. The additional appropriations reflect on the August Expenditure Report. - The Finance Director and City Treasurer met with Chamber of Commerce representatives to provide forms and information for Fiesta participant's sales tax reporting. - Coopers and Lybrand, the City's audit firm, began their field audit on August 26 and will continue until September 19. - The Finance Director attended the first meeting of the committee evaluating the Sheriff's proposal. STATISTICAL SECTION MONTHNT ITLASTMFYTH I DATED I TOST FY DATE CITATION PAYMENTS 3,929 5,776 8,179 11,119 INVOICES 10 11 25 44 CASH RECEIPTS 1,385 1,781 3,163 3,714 WARRANTS 331 331 679 672 PURCHASE ORDERS 386 425 753 861 UUT EXEMPTIONS 672 654 FILED TO DATE PAYROLL FULL TIME 162 164 PART TIME 73 63 DISCOUNTS TAKEN $ 245.47 Noted: $ 413.01 ?evin B. North raft Viki Copeland City Manager Finance Director Honorable Mayor and Members of September 16, 1991 Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council September 24, 1991 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - AUGUAST 1991 The Public Works Department is divided into three (3) major functions: Administration, Engineering and Maintenance. ADMINISTRATION The administration function coordinates and blends the efforts of all divisions of the Public Works Department in accomplishing the directives of the City Council and City Manager; includes engineering and management of capital improvement projects. Permits Issued: Current This Month FY Last FY Type Month Last FY To Date To Date Sewer Demolition 0 2 4 6 Sewer Lateral 0 0 2 0 Street Excavation 6 6 9 11 Utility Co's only 26 0 26 0 Dumpster/Strand 1 1 3 1 Banner Permits 3 1 4 3 ENGINEERING The Capital Improvement Projects which are currently in progress are: CIP 85-137 FAU, Asphaltic Over- CIP 86-176 Traffic Control Pre-emp. lay, Valley, Ardmore CIP 89-406 Sewer Rehab/Area 4 & Prospect CIP 89-506 Various Park Imp. CIP 89-142 Sidewalk Repairs CIP 89-511 R -R -O -W Parking Lot CIP 89-144 Strand Walk & Walkway CIP 89-615 Community Center Fire CIP 91-165 Misc. Bikeway Const. Alarm System CIP 89-170 Slurry Sealing MAINTENANCE The maintenance function of the Public Works Department is divided into the following sections: - Parks/Medians - Traffic Safety - Street Maintenance/Sanitation - Building Maintenance - Sewers/Storm Drains - Equipment Service - Street Lighting Parks Division/Medians: Roof repairs at 6th Street & Prospect. Irrigation repairs City-wide. Street Maintenance/Sanitation: Replaced bus bench at 33rd Street and Manhattan. Removed & replaced meter poles on Hermosa Avenue. Poured concrete & finished around new light poles on Unit Block of 17th, 18th and 19th Street. Put up restriction sign in downtown area for Fiesta. Repaired sidewalk City-wide. Repaired broken sewer main at 8th Street and Valley Drive. Sewers/Storm Drain Division: Installed new floats in wet well at sewer pump station. Hanged & removed flags on Pier Avenue and downtown area. Rodded sewer mains City-wide. Helped put on new roof of 6th Street & Prospect. Street Lighting: Put up banner City-wide. Worked on Fire Alarm System at Community Center. Repaired electrical outlets throughout Valley Park. Repaired light on fishing Pier. Put in new street light pole in unit block of 17th, 18th and 19th Street. Traffic Safety Division: Removed graffiti City-wide. Worked on Fire Alarm System at Community Center. Painted stop legends and bars over new slurry seal also cross walks. Painted red curbs on Pier Avenue from Valley Drive to Strand. Building Maintenance Division: Roof repairs at 6th Street & Prospect. Painted mens and womens restroom on fishing pier. Finished shelves in copy room upstairs in City Hall. Repaired bad spots on tennis courts at Community Center. Equipment Service: On-going maintenance of City vehicles and equipment. Graffiti Removal: JULY 1990 AUGUST 1990 SEPTEMBER 1990 OCTOBER 1990 NOVEMBER 1990 DECEMBER 1990 JANUARY 1991 FEBRUARY 1991 MARCH 1991 APRIL 1991 MAY 1991 JUNE 1991 YTD TOTAL Res tfully s 39.75 48.00 30.00 81.50 79.00 41.00 33.75 29.50 35.00 70.75 40.50 21.50 Hrs. JULY 1991 59.50 Hrs. Hrs. AUGUST 1991 19.00 Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. 550.25 Hrs. bmitted, B l Glic I terim Director of Public Works mon2/pwadmin YTD TOTAL 78.50 Hrs. Noted: NOT AVAILABLE FOR SIGNATURE Kevin B. Northcraft City Manager