The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/08/93y7.. t/r24 #23- 5C /a t "17,(1-1-71- 41-t-ok 93 -/i 9X a - "If you want truly to understand something, try to change it." -Kurt Lewin AGENDA REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 8, 1993 - Council Chambers, City Hall MAYOR Albert Wiemans MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Y. Edgerton COUNCILMEMBERS Robert Benz Robert Essertier Kathleen Midstokke Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Frederick R. Ferrin CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All Council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Depart- ment, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting a packet also is available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER: Ken Robertson, Planning Associate PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the - 1 - b (a) majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. Recommendation to approve the following minutes:' 1) Regular adjourned meeting of City Council held on May 20, 1993; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on May 25, 1993. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the May, 1993 invest- ment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer John M. Workman dated June 3, 1993. (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) Recommendation to approveclease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Los Angeles` County Bar Association Dispute Resolution Services, Inc. for space in the Community Center (Room 6B). Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June 1, 1993. Recommendation toraward e contract to HMC Group for ar- chitectural and engineering plans for the Police Station remodel, Phase III. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated June 1, 1993. Recommendation to approve request from Fleet Feet Tri- athlete for al -Sprint Triathlon to be held on Sunday, October 17, 1993. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 7, 1993. Recommendation to.adopt resolutiomto be included in the City's Prop A application packet to be submitted in or- der to collect the $2.48 million for Hermosa Valley Greenbelt acquisition. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment of one Community Services Of- ficer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated May 25, 1993. Recommendation to allow the contractor to complete the wall finish in accordance with project specifications for the Strand wall. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Charles McDonald dated June 1, 1993. (k) (1) Recommendation to approve appointment of Mr. Rick Learned to represent the City of Hermosa Beach business community on the Private Industry Council (PIC) of the Job Training Partnership Act (DTPA). Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 2, 1993. Recommendation to approve an authorization of $5,000 from the AB 702 funds to be used to purchase two addi- tional work stations and scanner software for the exist- ing PC network. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) LORDINANCE NO. -5-1=164-01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH; CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 22-3 OF THE PARKS REGULATIONS GENERALLY OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. For adoption (b) AN ORDINANCE\OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH; CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT_AND,_THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. For jintroductio a 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. 5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FANTASY ARCADE, 544 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Planning Direc-11 tor Michael Schubach dated June 2, 1993. l 6. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO "SMOKING POLLUTION CONTROL"fOR-J ZDINANCEr Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 1, 1993. 7, REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION AP- PROVAL PROVAL OF HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION IN R-3 ZONE AT 20 FOURTH STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 2, 1993. MUNICIPAL__ MATTERS 8. SOUTH SCHOOL PARK: COST ESTIMATES AND PRIORITIZATION. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. 9. APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR GREENBELT LANDSCAPING. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated June 3, 1993. 10. STRAND SAFETY: PRELIMINARY REPORT. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. 11. RECOMMENDATION TO APPOINT AN INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND APPROVE A RECRUITMENT PROCESS. Memorandum from Person- nel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 3, 1993. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) (b) Potential issues to be placed on the November, 1993 bal- lot. Memorandum from Planning Commission dated June 2, 1993. City Council/Planning Commission Joint Workshop meeting. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 2, 1993. 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating in the process of representative government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or oral- ly. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agenda packet with the item. If received after packet com- pilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will be- gin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the category Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. ACTION SHEET ACTION SHEET REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 8, 1993 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MARY ROONEY ROLL CALL: BENZ/EDGERTON ABSENT EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER: Ken Robertson, Planning Associate THE MAYOR PRESENTED KEN WITH A PLAQUE. KM ADDED THAT KEN IS VERY DESERVING OF THE AWARD. SHE HAS READ HIS STAFF REPORTS AND COM- PLIMENTED HIS ABILITY TO WRITE THOROUGH, EASY TO UNDERSTAND STAFF REPORTS. BENZ ARRIVED AT 7:05 P.M. CITY MGR. ANNOUNCED SUMMER RECREATION BROCHURE IS OUT 1> _ REGISTRATION FOR PROGRAMS BEGAN YESTERDAY. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION NONE 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular adjourned meeting of City Council held on May 20, 1993; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on .- 1993. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrant:_ Nos. through inc:_ �. PULLED BY RB - QUESTIONED COMPUTER LEASE ON PAGE 4, WARRANT 44158 AND ASKED HOW LONG IT WAS GOING TO GO ON. CAN WE BREAK THE LEASE. VIKI RE- SPONDED IT IS FOR THE APPLE COMPUTERS IN POLICE DEPT. AND WE CAN- NOT BREAK THE LEASE, BUT WE ARE GOING TO BUY IT OUT. VIKI WILL COME BACK WITH TOTAL COST AND HOW MANY COMPUTERS IT COVERS. ALSO ASKED FOR EXPLANATION OF BANC ONE LEASING WARRANT 44149 ON PAGE 3. IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT IT IS FOR FIVE PATROL CARS. MOTION RB/AW TO RATIFY DEMANDS AND WARRANTS. SO ORDERED. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to receive and file the May, 1993 invest- ment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer John M. Workman dated June 3, 1993. RB LEFT THE CHAMBER AT 7:30 P.M. (e) Recommendation to approve lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Los Angeles County Bar Association Dispute Resolution Services, Inc. for space in the Community Center (Room 6B). Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June 1, 1993. PULLED BY AW - INDICATED HIS POSITION HAS NOT CHANGED. HE WAS AGAINST BEFORE AND IS STILL AGAINST. MOTION BY KM/RE TO APPROVE. OK 2-1 (AW -NO) (RB ABSENT.) (f) (g) (h) Recommendation to award a contract to HMC Group for ar- chitectural and engineering plans for the Police Station remodel, Phase III. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated June 1, 1993. Recommendation to approve request from Fleet Feet Tri- athlete for a Sprint Triathlon to be held on Sunday, October 17, 1993. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 7, 1993. Recommendation to adopt resolution to be included in the City's Prop A application packet to be submitted in or- der to collect the $2.48 million for Hermosa Valley Greenbelt acquisition. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 93-5610. (i) (j) Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment of one Community Services Of- ficer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated May 25, 1993. Recommendation to allow the contractor to complete the wall finish in accordance with project specifications for the Strand wall. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Charles McDonald dated June 1, 1993. PULLED BY KM - OBJECTS TO COUNCIL BEING ASKED TO VOTE TO COMPLETE AS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT. COUNCIL SHOULD MAINTAIN A HANDS OFF POLICY. IF COUNCIL IS DISSATISFIED WHEN JOB DONE, IT IS UP TO STAFF TO WORK IT OUT. MOTION KM TO RECEIVE AND FILE. SECOND AW. OK 2-1. (RE -OK) RB ABSENT. (k) Recommendation to approve appointment of Mr. Rick Learned to represent the City of Hermosa Beach business 2 (1) community on the Private Industry Council (PIC) of the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA). Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 2, 1993. Recommendation to approve an authorization of $5,000 from the AB 702 funds to be used to purchase two addi- tional work stations and scanner software for the exist- ing PC network. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1090 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 22-3 OF THE PARKS REGULATIONS GENERALLY OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. For adoption. MOTION RE/RB TO ADOPT ORD. NO. 93-1090. OK 4-0 (SE ABSENT) (b) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. For introduction. CA SAID HE INADVERTANTLY PROVIDED THE WRONG ORDINANCE TO THE COUNCIL INSTEAD OF THE ONE THAT APPEARED IN THEIR PACKET AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, SO HE RECOMMENDED INTRODUCTION OF THE PRIOR OR- DINANCE (IDENTIFIED AS DRAFT #4" WITH ONE AMENDMENT, I.E. ADD A NEW SECTION 2 TO READ: "THE V.P.D. IS HEREBY DISSOLVED." AND RENUMBER CURRENT SECTION 2 TO BE SECTION 3. KM QUESTIONED HAVING TERM LIMITATIONS IN THE ORDINANCE WHEN SHE THOUGHT COUNCIL POLICY WAS TO HAVE NO TERM LIMITATIONS. RE QUESTIONED THE WORDING IN DRAFT #4 THAT INDICATES THE DUTIES, ETC. TO INCLUDE THE "AUTHORITY TO SET..." ETC. THINKS THAT SHOULD BE COUNCIL AND WOULD LIKE CHANGE TO "SUPERVISION AND MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS". MOTION RE/TO INTRO ORDINANCE WITH AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 2-142 STARTING ON LINE 4 TO SAY "DUTIES INCLUDE SUPERVISION AND MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS TO INCLUDE THE MAKING OF RECOMMENDATIONS REGARD- ING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PARKING POLICY ON PUBLIC LOTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT...". NO SECOND. MOTION RE/RB CONTINUED TO NEXT MEETING FOR CHANGES TO BE MADE BY CITY ATTY. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. MOTION AW/KM IN FU- TURE ADVERTISE PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR 7:30 P.M. SO ORDERED, NOTING ABSENCE OF SE. 5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FANTASY ARCADE, 544 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated June 2, 1993. OPENED AT 8:10 - NO ONE TO SPEAK. MOTION RE/KM TO CONTINUE TO JULY 13 (RE/KM SO ORDERED. 6. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO "SMOKING POLLUTION CONTROL" OR- DINANCE. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 1, 1993. NO PUBLIC COMMENT. MOTION RE/TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 93-1091. SECOND AW. RE WANTS TO AMEND HIS MOTION TO INCLUDE THE CITY HALL ATRIUM AS A NON-SMOKING AREA. AW SAID HE WOULD WITHDRAW HIS SECOND IF IT IS INCLUDED. RE ACQUIESED. MOTION THEN AMENDED TO ADD UNDER SECTION 1, AT THE END OF NO. 1, "EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ATRIUM AREA." OK 3-1 (RB) (SE ABSENT). 7. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION AP- PROVAL OF HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION IN R-3 ZONE AT 20 FOURTH STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 2, 1993. MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:37 P.M. RB ABSENT. RB ARRIVED AT 8:39 P.M. SE ARRIVED AT 8:41 P.M. SE ASKED IF P.C. MADE FINDINGS. SCHUBACH RESPONDED, BUT SAID IT DID NOT MEET THE CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY STATUTE. PATRICK KILLEN - REPRESENTED THE APPLICANT. EXPLAINED THE DIF- FICULTY OF MEETING THE CODE EXACTLY ON SUCH A SMALL LOT. MARY ANNE O'SULLIVCAN - HAS PROPERTY DIRECTLY BEHIND - SPOKE RE. PARKING PROBLEM AND FEARING THEY WOULD TEAR UP HER PROPERTY DURING CONSTRUCTION. MOTION SE/SEND BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO MAKE FINDINGS OR ON THE FLIP SIDE SUGGEST APPLICANT GO FOR A VARIANCE. SECOND RB. OK 3-2 (RE/AW-NO) MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. SOUTH SCHOOL PARK: COST ESTIMATES AND PRIORITIZATION. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. KM QUESTIONED FIGURES. RB RETURNED AT 7:40 P.M. PETE MANGURIAN - OBJECTED TO COST OF PARK. STEVE CRECY - SPOKE IN FAVOR OF MASTER PLANNING PARK. KATHY MCCURDY SPOKE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND HAVING HAVING WORKING DRAWINGS PREPARED SO REALISTIC NUMBERS CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS. J.R.REVICSKY - GAVE INSIGHT ON WHAT PARKS & REC. COMMISSION WAS THINKING. BRIAN MITCHELL - SAZAKI LANSCAPE ARCHITECT SAID IF COUNCIL COULD DETERMINE WHAT KIND OF BUDGET AVAILABLE MOTION KM FOR STAFF REC. AW SECOND FOR DISCUSSION, THEN WITHDREW SECOND. DIED FOR LACK OF SECOND. MOTION RE TO GET A PARK GOING WITH CURRENT RESOURCES - A MINIMUM PARK WITH SPRINKLERS AND GRASS. RE - STAFF COME BACK WITH REPORT ON THE MONIES CURRENTLY AVAILABLE. RE - MOTION TO APPROVE PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR PHASE ONE SITE PREPARATION PLUS LAWN. SECOND RB. OK 3-1 (KM) SE ABSENT. 9. APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR GREENBELT LANDSCAPING. Memorandum from Public Works Director Charles McDonald dated June 3, 1993. CHARLES MCDONALD EXPLAINED THE PLAN AND TIMETABLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION.. MOTION KM/SE TO APPROVE STAFF REC. WITH EXCEPTION OF PIER/ VALLEY/ARDMORE INTERSECTION, INDICATING THAT PORTION SHOULD BE HELD OFF UNTIL R/UDAT PLAN FOR PIER AVE. IS KNOWN. VOTE: OK 5-0. DIR. MCDONALD ASKED FOR COUNCIL INPUT ON HANDLING OF THE OLEANDERS ALONG VALLEY DRIVE. MOTION KM TO REFER TO PARKS & REC. COMM. FOR A RECOMMENDATION. SECOND SE. OK 5-0. 10. STRAND SAFETY: PRELIMINARY REPORT. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. B.J. MITCHELL - IS IN SUPPORT OF SOME OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS. SOLUTION NO. 1 IS GOOD, SOLUTION NO. 2 ALSO EXCELLENT BUT WIDTH FOR PEDESTRIANS SHOULD BE 8 FT. RATHER THAN 4. AGREES WITH PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS, BUT DOES NOT THINK #3 IS WORKABLE. PATTI EGERER - NEED ALTERNATE BIKE PATH. MOTION KM FOR SOLUTION NO. 1 SECOND BY SE. (AT 2ND, 8TH AND 22ND). OK 5-0. 11. RECOMMENDATION TO APPOINT AN INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND APPROVE A RECRUITMENT PROCESS. Memorandum from Person- nel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 3, 1993. 5 MOTION KM APPOINT MR AS INTERIM AND PAY HER THE CURRENT C.M. SAL- ARY. SECOND SE. MOTION FAILS RE/SE/RB-NO). MOTION RE/RB CURRENT SALARY PLUS 10% WHICH WOULD BE $6563. OK 4-1 (KM -Y0) RE/RB GO OUT FOR RECRUITMENT HAVING PERSONNEL DIRECTOR ACQUIRE AS MANY SOLID RESUMES AS POSSIBLE TO COME BACK TO COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL. OK 4-1 (KM -NO) MOTION AW/RB TO DO AS SOON AS POS- SIBLE SO APPOINTMENT CAN BE MADE BEFORE OCTOBER IF POSSIBLE. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER C.A. WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A BRIEF CLOSED SESSION AT CLOSE OF THIS MEETING. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Potential issues to be placed on the November, 1993 bal- lot. Memorandum from Planning Commission dated June 2, 1993. MOTION RE/RB - TO PLACE ON BALLOT THE ISSUE OF PRIVATE PARKING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ALONG WALK STREETS BETWEEN HERMOSA AVE. AND THE STRAND THAT WOULD BE TO EXCLUDE PARKING ON THOSE LOCATIONS (PER P.C. MEMO). (KM/AW/SE-NO) RB - SUGGESTS A MEASURE THAT ALL REGULATIONS BEFORE BEING IMPLE- MENTED SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: THAT 1) THERE MUST BE AN IDENTIFICATION OF THE SPECIFIC PROBLEMS TO BE ADDRESSED BY THIS REGULATION, 2) ESTABLISHING THAT THE REGULATION IS NECESSARY BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING: THERE EXISTS NO ADEQUATE REMEDY IN EX- ISTING LAWS, AND IT ADDRESS NO MORE THAN THE STATED PROBLEM; 3) ALL BUSINESS OWNERS HAVE THE RIGHT TO A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE ADDITIONAL. REGULATIONS ARE IMPOSED. SECOND EDGERTON. MOTION FAILS 2-3 (KM/RE/AW-NO) RE - RAISE THE SQ. FT. REQUIRED IN R-3 PER UNIT TO LOWER THE NUM- BER OF UNITS. SECOND KM. OK 4-1 (AW). KM - TWO AMENDMENTS TO CIVIL SERVICE ORDINANCE. ONE REGARDS CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENTS. ALSO THE REQUIREMENT THAT CIVIL SER- VICE COMMISSION MEMBERS HAVE TO RESIGN IF THEY RUN FOR COUNCIL. (BRING BACK FOR DISCUSSION). THEY APPEAR TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL. SECOND WIEMANS. OK 5-0. KM - ISSUE OF SEPARATE PATH (SHOULD THE CITY CONSTRUCT A SEPARATE BIKE PATH WEST OF STRAND WALL.) AS AN ADVISORY VOTE. SECOND RE. OK 4-1 (AW) (b) City Council/Planning Commission Joint Workshop meeting. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 2, 1993. ADD AN ITEM FOR WORKSHOP MEETING THAT DEALS WITH REMOVAL OF NON- CONFORMING USES AFTER A PERIOD OF TIME, I.E., AMORTIZING OUT NON- CONFORMING USES. 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. C.A. ASKED ABOUT OIL CUP HEARING. SE WILL NOT BE THERE. READ- VERTISE FOR 1ST JULY MTG. B.J. MITCHELL - SPOKE OF ACM SALARY. GENE DREHER - SHOULD GET THE SAME AS CM IF ACTING POLICE CHIEF MAKING SAME AS FORMER CHIEF.. PATTI EGERER - SHOULD KNOW THE COST OF COURT DEFENSE IF SEPARATE BIKE PATH WEST OF STRAND. JIM LISSNER - ENDORSEMENTS BY DEPT. HEADS IS ILLEGAL IN AN ELECTION. ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION RE. MILLER VS. H.B. AT 10:18 P.M. • 5PRED 06-08-93 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Herp9sa Beach, California, held on June 8, 1993, at the hour of 7: (J7P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 69 ROLL CALL JO Present: Beiz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans Absent:' None EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER: Ken Robertson, Planning Associate Mayor Wiemans introduced Personnel Director Robert Blackwood who presented a plaque to Ken Robertson, Associated Planner for four years, as employee of the quarter for his level of performance and quality of work in preparation of analytical reports for the Planning Department. ��J / 7: 06. Crn �-�� F �'� `"�- -3 � dam" PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings, 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters, and 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: (Ja Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, Dave Reimer - 802 Monterey Blvd., Jerry Compton - 1200 Artesia Blvd., City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 1 i • 1. 1. j))2 • Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, Jim Rosenberger - 1121 Bayview Drive, Tom Morley - 516 Loma Drive, Richard Sullivan - 824 Third Street, Edie Webber - 1210 Eleventh Street, Gene Dreher - 1222 Seventh Place, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, Martin Moreno Marc Freeman - Betty Martin - Merna Marshall - 1326 Corona Street, 1937 Palm Drive, 257 27th Street, - 360 33rd Place, CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Councilmember requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (1), with the exception of the following items which were removed for discussion in item 3, but are shown in order for clarity: (a) r (b) , (c) , (f) , (g) , (h) , (i) , , (d) (j) Motion , (e) , and (1) F......-, second . So ordered. "Coming speak to s eak on items not removed from the consent calendar were: City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 2 • No one came forward to speak on items not removed from the con- sent calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Regular adjourned meeting of City Council held on May 20, 1993; 2) Regular meeting of the City Council held on May 25, 1993. Action: To approve the minutes of the regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of May 20, 1993 as presented and the minutes of the regular meeting of May 25, 1993 as (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. 2..„) lection: To presented. y4c-e ) .5.�-( o (c) Recomm ation g• y yy/s39 (d) —7,0000 ratify the demands and warrants as Gam_ /4° ‘r o' • 06/A) to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. Recommendation to receive and file the May, 1993 invest- ment report. Memorandum from City Treasurer John M. Workman dated June 3, 1993. Action: To receive and file the May, 1993 investment report as presented. City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 3 (e) (f) Recommendation to approve r ease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and "the Los Angeles County Bar Association Dispute Resolution Services, Inc. for space in the Community Center (Room 6B). Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated June 1, 1993. This ite was removed from the consent calendar by Mayor Wiemans for separate discussion later in the meeting. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation of a one year lease agreement between the City of Hermo- sa Beach and the Los Angeles County Bar Association Dis- pute Resolution Services for Room 6B in the Community Center at a monthly rental rate of $174 (200 sq.ft. X $.87 per sq.ft.) for an annual income to the City of $2,088; and, authorize the Mayor to sign the lease. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Mayor Wiemans and Recommendation to award.a contract\to HMC Group for ar- chitectural and engineering plans for the Police Station remodel, Phase III. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated June 1, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Essertier for separate discussion later in the meeting. Acting Police Chief Straser presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Proposed Action: To award the bid to Peha and Associ- ates and authorize the Mayor to sign a contract for work in the amount of $14,600. Motion , second . The motion carried/failed City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 4 (g) (h) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to award a contract to HMC Group of Ontario for the preparation of plans for the police station downstairs remodel, Phase III, at a cost of $18,900; and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. Motion , second The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Recommendation to approve request from Fleet Feet Tri- athlete for a cSprint—Triathl"on to be held on Sunday, October 17, 1993. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 7, 1993. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Midstokke for separate discussion later in the meeting. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation to approve the request for a sprint triathlon, sponsored by the Fleet Feet Triathlete and Project Touch, on Sun- day, October 17, 1993, consisting of: 1) 1/4 mile swim; 2) 9 mile bicycle race (a portion in Redondo Beach); 3) 3 mile run; and 4) post event activities including sand castle build- ing and volleyball contests. The race will begin at 7:30 A.M. and event fees of $3,065 (estimated) will be paid. Motion , second . The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Recommendation totadopt resolutiomto be included in the City's Prop A application packet to be submitted in or- der to collect the $2.48 million for Hermosa Valley Greenbelt acquisition. Memorandum from Community City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 5 • /v/p) (i) (j) Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. Sup- plemental information, Attachment "B" (Appendix A), dat- ed June 7, 1993. Action: to adopt {Res olutiori No. 93-5610), entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROV- ING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SPECIFIED PROJECT GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELT ACQUISITION." Recommendation to approve request for 30 day extension of temporary appointment of one Community Services Of- ficer. Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Black- wood dated May 25, 1993. Action: To approve the request for a 30 day extension of the temporary appointment of one Community Services Officer. Recommendation to allow the contractor to complete the wall finish in accordance with project specifications for the Strand wall. Memorandum from Public Works Di- rector Charles McDonald dated June 1, 1993. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to allow the Contractor to complete the finish coats of the Strand wall in accordance with the project specifica- tions of: 1) ordinary surface finish, which sands the surface and cleans and fills the holes and pockets with mortar; and, 2) class 1 surface finish, which is applied at least 30 days after the concrete has been exposed, to sand the surface and apply the finish for an even surface and uniform color. City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 6 14 • • (k) (1) Recommendation to approve appointment of Mr. Rick Learned to represent the City of Hermosa Beach business community on the Private Industry Council (PIC) of the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA). Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 2, 1993. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to appoint Rick Learned to represent the City of Hermosa Beach business community on the Private Industry Council (PIC) of the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) for a four year term beginning in July, 1993. Recommendation to approve an authorization of $5,000 from the AB 702 funds to be used to purchase two addi- tional work stations and scanner software for the exist- ing PC network. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au- thorize $5,000 from the AB 702 funds to be used to pur- chase two additional work stations and scanner software for the existing PC network. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. (a) +ORDINANCE -NO. -93-1090y- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 22-3 OF THE PARKS REGULATIONS GENERALLY OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. For adoption. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 93-1090. Motion) second The motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 7 s (b) AN CORDINANCE -F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFO NIA, TO ESTABLIS A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. For introduction. Supplemental informa- tion, original draft Ordinance, June 8,1993. carcn, � #a r ( /,..D e,. � Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 93-109 •] Motion ,, second .The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of // (1./9 //1. goly) <_ ff. —2 e=rc ) f' ,/rr Final Action: To waive further reading of Onance No '93-109 ,entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF / THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION S BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS." Motion , second AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE Lr AYES: NOES: Benz, Edgerton, Wiemans None Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor 711(711" - 27) 2 rl ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR OR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. �� a 43_�� tope Items 1(a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , (h) , (i) , (j) , (k), and (1) were heard at this time but are shown in order for clarity. City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 8 • * Public comments on items removed from the Consent (_ 0 Calendar are shown under the appropriate items. t 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PI)/ d r PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 8:00 P.M. '7 / !'f /'1 �, 5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION i�ev�''� OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FANTASY ARCADE, 544 )3`?/ PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum from Planning Direc- tor Michael Schubach dated June 2, 1993. , ,e: r?. --7/ ea-- ---- ( e'- .-fr---;‘, Action: To approve the staff recommendation to extend the time period for the Planning Commission to report back to the City Council on the "Fantasy Arcade" C.U.P. referral, and to continue the public hearing to the regular meeting of July 13, 1993. Motion £o), second 42. So ordered. >79 A) / ---7-s x x�1 y (�� 6. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO "SMOKING POLLUTION CONTROL" OR- ' DINANCE: Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 1, 1993. Personnel Director Blackwood presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:%55 P.M. Coming forward to ad- dress the Council on this item were: zit City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 9 • The public hearing was closed at P.M. Action: To introduce OOrdinance-No: 93=T09t. Motion a second A). the motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of _— y Final Action: To waive further reading of 0 finance No.) c'93-109 , %entitled, HAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 86-852, SMOK- ING POLLUTION CONTROL, AND CHAPTER 14 1/2 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNI IPAL CODE.' Motion , second AYES: Benz, Wiemans NOES: None � � L k%v 4,) z37 REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION AP- PROVAL OF HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION IN R-3 ZONE AT 20 FOURTH STREET. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated June 2, 1993. 6 ,z4 Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor .1* 6,19 v � Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. f,1/ The public hearing opened at 344 P.M. Coming forward to ad- dress the Council on this item were: 8'; SD City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 10 • ;',J The public hearing was closed at : P.M. >,0,t4,__,,,e_„ ,6)' e---,--> )/('LL A) -,4( -2_-... ,,,- ),-2d Ed/6 4 st— k3 16)‘•°r7D ) 1 34 Pro sed Action: To sustain the Planning Commission decision to approve the height exception. Motion , second . The motion failed, due to the dissenting votes of ( (r:q71--- Action: To overturn the decision of the Planning Com- mission on the findings that the project does not satis- fy the conditions for granting an exception^as_set forth in Section 601, and adopt'R se ol`ution No. 9356 enti- tled, ',A RESOLUTION OF THEA CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO DENY A REQUEST UPON RECON- SIDERATION TO ALLOW HEIGHT EXCEPTION AT 20 4TH STREET DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHERLY 1/2 OF LOT 8 AND NORTHERLY 47.5, OF THE WESTERLY 5, OF LOT 9, BLOCK 4, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT." Motion , second . the motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Action: to refer the requested exception back to the Planning Commission to carefully reconsider the facts of the case, and its consistency with the language of Sec- tion 601. Motion , second The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of MUNICIPAL MATTERS City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 11 • 8. SOUTH SCHOOL PARK: COST ESTIMATES AND PRIORITIZATION. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. fr-,0-asAft-\--.00(-) a- 7Yo Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Atc,"1:0-47cAALA /"" J G� G-2-7 "21)- &AA-oti, .7, 4,-, ,p,y0 2 Proposed Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommendation to: 1) approve the conceptual plan for the park as pres- ented at the April 13, 1993 City Council meeting; 2) direct staff to prepare a request for bids for an architectural firm to provide designs and working drawings for the park; 3) adopt the Commission's prioritization of the park development; and, 4) receive and file the cost estimates for park construction. 4- �i �_-moi'/��• Motion , second . The dissenting votes o PA' LY 9. motion carried, noting the "1/4„e27 ) t'eY° 7)1 111 APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR GREENBELT LANDSCAPING. Memorandum Works Director Charles McDonald dated June from Public 3, 1993. Public Works Director McDonald presented the staff re- port and responded to Council questions. oyi ,) City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 12 ,f/) ///' toy f �9Ajt `7(,o/ -J• c.• f - 6,, '49--7/f/ 5.9/t \4t )/\i'\ J) • • Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Action: To Motion , second . The motion Action: To approve the staff recommendation to direct staff to request bids for the prop sed landscaping of the Greenbelt for: f" //"!/-- 1) purchase of irrigatiequipme t, $10,000; 2) purchase of trees, $17,000; and, 3) installation of trees, included above. Motion M , second The motion 10. STRAND SAFETY: PRELIMINARY REPORT. Memorandum from Com- munity Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 28, 1993. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: W�g0 v L �3 -#/ 2 £Q 2 J jf-1/4-0-r ) 'V— e.Aeg, } 3 7' 41/y -yr &vc 3 -""( ;7/-0 let-lr'X' 5erj- )-) V "A • I r " 404' City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 13 • Proposed Action: to receive and file. Motion , second . The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Action: To 0024.1i.j- ""'—`rc-4 11. RECOMMENDATION TO APPOINT AN INTERIM CITY APPROVE A RECRUITMENT PROCESS. Memorandum nel Director Robert Blackwood dated June 3, Personnel Director Blackwood presented the and r sponded to Councilgoesions. t MANAGER AND from Person - 1993. staff report ,.....s,o) Action: To approve the staff recommendation to: appoint Mary Rooney as Interim City Manager effec- tive July 1, 1993 and establish a salary for the interim appointment; and, authorize recruitment for Manager. Jam" GJ Motion , second dissenting votes of ) 7 /V' 1) the position of City The motion carried, noting the /0170 is �a 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Ferrin reported X k Gym xX z i/17 XI( City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 14 • 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) Potential issues to be placed on the November, 1993 bal- lot. Memorandum from Planning Commission dated June 2, 1993. Supplemental letter from James F. O'Brien, 2530 The Strand, dated June 8, 1993. 4/110 ----Zi dr A e --- Action: To (6 Cer• 47 `� 1r ss sG 50,!_4).,-)5 "°/62-1; /4'1° ==r- r 2 --,31) (b) City Council/Planning Commission Joint Workshop meeting. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated )6° 7 .4t) = June 2, 993. Action: To approve a joint workshop meeting with the Planning Commission for Thursday, July 22, 1993, at the hour of 7:00 P.M., with topics to include: 1) adult uses: a) National City adult use legal case; b) City's adult use Ordinance; 2) R/UDAT - Pier Improvement; 3) undergrounding utilities; and, 4) planting of median on Pacific Coast Highway. City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 15 ''' -- Id'x/,0• 1 r "_50,i;, 4/ • '7r ---r;e7 ocv.0/1 4 71' -r ,, 6 --t,,--_-,--27(_,/e- ---er7 /ft4e. 4._------ --..-- - ----- , ---- •-)3 rir7 k,--- r-'3 — cf, ,,_--- 0-, 1-(- _,/,,,,7 ,_____ A ) 0 CV ' C'/V74 ujo • • 14. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Coun- cil action tonight. & ) '?) ,__J› /) > 41.'C--AITIZEN COMMENTS (Q.,_.L� 7� degfe Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: r /' 6 dam' coo / 9 C ,,oct-l=t7 ) 2 ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned on Tuesday, June 8, 1993, at the hour of /0:AS P.M. to he Regular Adjourned Meeting of Thursday, June 10, 1993, at t e hour of 7:30 P.M., for the pur- pose of a continued prelimi ry budget and capital improvement workshop. r gAiffttlaj Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 06-08-93 Page 16 May 24, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 8, 1993 PRESENTATION OF OUTSTANDING EMPLOYEE AWARD The City of Hermosa Beach Employee Performance Award honors City Employees who have displayed either sustained performance above expected levels or have performed a one-time action which exceeds expectations. Nominations for the award may be made by citizens, City Council Members, department heads and other employees. From the nominations, the Management Team selects the award recipient(s). For the 3rd quarter of FY 92-93 (January, February & March) the Management Team has selected the following employee for recognition. Ken Robertson, Associate Planner, Planning Department Ken has been with the City's Planning Department since January 1989. Ken started his career with the City as the Contract Advanced Planner, and soon advanced to the position of Associate Planner. Ken has consistently demonstrated his professionalism and value to the Planning Department and to the City. During his four years he has sustained an exceptional level of performance and quality of work. Ken's participation in the preparation of the numerous analytical reports required of the Planning Department has allowed the department to maintain a high quality product in an environment of diminished resources. It is now our pleasure to present Ken with a plaque to commemorate his selection as "Employee of the Quarter". Respectfully submitted; Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director wp/emp Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Clerk ElID.k. DATE: June 8, 1993 SUBJECT: Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Agenda Item 1.(a) 1) - May 20, 1993 Budget Workshop Minutes It is requested that approval of the May 20, 1993 Budget Workshop Minutes -- Consent Calendar item (a) 1) -- be continued to the next regular meeting of June 22, 1993, as they have not yet been completed. Thank you. Uf PLEMEN1, t. INFORMATION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on May 25, 1993, at the hour of 7:42 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mary Rooney, Community Resources Director ROLL CALL Present: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans Absent: None PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE FROM CITY TO RETIRING PUBLIC WORKS CREWLEADER RICHARD OLSEN - City Manager Ferrin read a humorous proclamation commending Dick Olsen, who is retiring next week, for his 35 years of service with the City, first with the General Services Department, later as a Crewleader in the Public Works Department. Mayor Wiemans presented the plaque of appreciation. PRESENTATION BY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT RICK LEARNED TO RETIRING CITY EMPLOYEE RICHARD OLSEN - Rick Learned, Chamber of Commerce President, presented a plaque of appreciation to Dick Olsen on his imminent retirement for his service to both resi- dents and businesses in Hermosa Beach. ANNOUNCEMENTS - City Manager Ferrin announced the death of Vern Highfield on Friday, May 21, 1993 after a short illness. Vern was a 37 year employee with the City and was scheduled to retire shortly. He came to the City after five years playing profes- sional baseball with the Brooklyn Dodgers and started as a street laborer in 1956. Vern rose through the ranks in the Public Works Department and became superintendent in 1981, holding that posi- tion for the past 12 years. Vern Highfield dedicated his life to Hermosa Beach and was well -liked and respected by both residents and staff, his loss will be mourned by all. City Manager Ferrin also announced the sudden death of Mike Lines on Sunday, May 23, 1993. Mike was a 13 year veteran of the Fire Department, who as a state -certified fire officer and, member of the South Bay arson team served as public education officer as a firefighter and paramedic for Hermosa Beach. President of the Hermosa Beach Firefighters Association in 1991 and 1992, Mike also led the chili -cooking team to the state finals. Through his CPR training classes for the public and his skill as a paramedic there are many people alive because Mike was here for them, he will be missed by everyone. Mayor Wiemans announced that tonight's meeting would adjourn in memory of Vern Highfield, Mike Lines and resident Wilma Burt. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: 1 a Ca) City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 1 June 'Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, suggested that the meetings could go faster if Council - members would consult with staff regarding an- swers to their questions rather than agendize the'question; Gary Wayland - 1097 Aviation, spoke regarding the decline in sales tax revenue, suggested that the City should put more emphasis on encourag- ing business to relocate in Hermosa and con- tinue to streamline its procedures. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the Consent Calendar recommendations (a) through (j), with the exception of the following item which was removed for discussion in item 3, but is shown in order for clarity: (b) Benz. Motion Essertier, second Edgerton. So ordered. No one came forward to speak on items not removed from the con- sent calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve minutes of regular meeting of the City Council held on May 11, 1993. (b) Action: To approve the minutes of May 11, 1990 as presented. Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. 43901 through 44060 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 43902, 43903, 43926, 43928, 43983, 43984, 44003, and 44059. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Coun- cilmember Benz for separate discussion later in the meeting due to a question regarding a payment on page 12 of the May 11 warrants of $1147 for a rental car. Risk Manager Blackwood responded to Council questions and said the rental car charge was due to an accident which disabled a narcotics vehicle, but the cost of the rental and repair to the City car was being reimbursed by the other driver's insurance. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. Motion Benz, second Mayor Wiemans. So ordered. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 2 (d) (e) (f) (g) Recommendation to receive and file the April, 1993 financial reports: 1) Revenue and expenditure report; 2) City Treasurer's report. , Action: To receive and file the April, 1993 financial reports as presented. Recommendation to approve Request for Bids for Tennis Court resurfacing. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 27, 1993. Action: To approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommendation of a request for bids for the resurfacing of eight ten- nis courts (six at the Community Center and two at Clark field) at an estimated cost of $24,000, to be funded from the Park and Recreation Facility Tax. Recommendation to authorize the purchase of a satellite antenna system for receiving training programs for law enforcement. Memorandum from Acting Police Chief Val Straser dated May 12, 1993. Action: To authorize the purchase of a satellite anten- na system in order to receive law enforcement training programs which are broadcast by the State Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST), at an equipment cost bid of $2,055.47, submitted by Globe Satellite in Lawndale, which would be reimbursed by POST, and an installation cost of $602.08, which is not reimbursable. Recommendation to adopt resolutions regarding the en- gineer's report and setting July 13, 1993 for a public hearing on the Hermosa Beach Crossing Guard Maintenance District 1993-1994. Memorandum from Public Works Direc- tor Charles McDonald dated May 4, 1993. Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5606, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF SAID CITY MADE PURSUANT TO THE RE- QUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION 92-5593 OF SAID COUNCIL.", which has an assessment fee of $5.05 per unit, the same as last year. Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5607, enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN CROSSING GUARD SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE "THE CROSSING GUARDS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ACT OF 1974", CHAPTER 3.5, ARTICLES 1, 2, 3 AND 4, SECTION 55530 THROUGH 55570, OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AT CERTAIN LOCATIONS IN THE SAID CITY, FOR City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 3 (h) (i) (7) I THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1993 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1994; AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEAR- ING IN RELATION THERETO... Recommendation to adopt resolutions regarding the en- gineer's report and setting July 13, 1993 for a public hearing on the Hermosa Beach Street Lighting Maintenance District 1993-1994. Memorandum from Public Works Direc- tor Charles McDonald dated May 4, 1993. • Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5608, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF SAID CITY MADE PURSUANT TO THE RE- QUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION 92-5592 OF SAID COUNCIL... Final Action: To adopt Resolution No. 93-5609, enti- tled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN STREET LIGHTING FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES TO BE INSTALLED, MAINTAINED AND ELECTRIC CURRENT TO BE FURNISHED FOR STREET LIGHTING FIXTURES THROUGHOUT THE CITY, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1993 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1994; AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN RELATION THERETO... Recommendation to approve request to extend contract with Colen & Lee for Liability Claims Administration Service. Memorandum from Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated May 17, 1993. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to au- thorize an extension of the service agreement with Colen & Lee for a two year period from July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1995, for Liability Claims Administration, at no increase in cost for the first year. Recommendation to approve the class specification for Secretary to the City Manager. Memorandum from Person- nel Director Robert Blackwood dated May 20, 1993. Action: To approve the revised class specification for the Secretary to the City Manager as approved by the Civil Service Board, the specific change of which is to make shorthand a highly desirable ability rather than a required ability. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 93-1089 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HER- MOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, SECTION 1160(d), PERTAINING TO THE DRIVEWAY GRADES, AND ADOPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. For adoption. City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 4 j Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 93-1089. Motion Essertier, second Midstokke. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION .,r Items 1(b) was heard at this time but is shown in order for clarity. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar are shown under the appropriate items. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) Letter from Roy A. Judd, 2416 Hermosa Avenue, dated. May 11, 1993 regarding the scavenging of recycle material, with written response from Acting Police Chief Val Straser. Action: To receive and file, noting the response letter from Acting Police Chief Straser. Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. So ordered. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING A DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT BOARD TO REPLACE THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMIS- SIONERS. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Fer- rin dated May 20, 1993. Supplemental letter from the majority opinion of the Vehicle Parking District: Jack Wood, Helene Frost, and Paul Hennessey, dated May 24, 1993. City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. City Attorney Vose also responded to Councilquestions and explained the options between the two types of dis- tricts by saying that the Vehicle Parking District was developed to create and maintain parking lots and had the ability to make assessments against business proper- ty owners to gain funds for expansion or structures, also, that it was legal for it to declare excess funds and make them available to the General Fund of the City for other purposes; the Downtown Enhancement District could maintain the parking lots and provide a mechanism to make the funds available for the types of activities listed on page 6 of the draft ordinance, but it could not make assessments against the property owners. The public hearing was opened at 8:11 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jack Wood - 200 Pier Avenue, #38, Vehicle Parking District, Board of Parking Place Commission, City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 5 said that once the Vehicle Parking District was dissolved it could not be re-established if needed; that the VPD had a credit history and good credit rating; and that the improvements mentioned by R/UDAT could not be accomplished with the annual profits available to the VPD; suggested keeping the VPD and creating another commission to accomplish the other projects; Jerry Newton - 2041 Circle Drive, Vehicle Parking District, Board of Parking Place Commission, said that the VPD had no authority to fund projects outside of its parking lots; it could declare excess funds but could not earmark them for specific projects; that page 5 of the draft ordinance listed the duties of the proposed new commission; Helene Frost - 58 Pier Avenue, Vehicle Parking District, Board of Parking Place Commission, said that parking was the critical issue to the downtown businesses and should not be diluted with concerns for other areas; Garrison Frost - 58 Pier Avenue, Coast Drug owner, spoke in favor of keeping the current board to -- deal with parking and creating a separate board to accomplish the other goals of the downtown revitalization; Jerry Compton - 1723 Valley Park Avenue, agreed with the majority view of the VPD, that it had a track record, longevity, that it would not be possible to get the 50% owner approval to form a VPD today if this is dissolved, and the R/ UDAT study had said that the City already had a VPD in place which was the perfect vehicle to accomplish the parking needs for downtown revitalization; Patricia Spiritus - 58 11th Street, Vehicle Parking District, Board of Parking Place Commission, said that parking should be interactive with the pedestrian needs in the downtown area, so favors a new board; and, Carol Hunt - Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce, said the Chamber had felt it was not in its best interest to take a position on this issue. The public hearing was closed at 8:40 P.M. Action: To dissolve the current Vehicle Parking Dis- trict and the Board of Parking Place Commission and to create a Downtown Enhancement Board by directing staff to return with the proper language and the final draft of the Ordinance. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Mayor Wiemans. City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 6 The meeting recessed at 9:01 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:19 P.M. City Attorney Vose suggested that the Council act to direct the City Clerk to initiate the process to adver- tise for vacancies on the newly created Downtown En- hancement Board in accordance with past practice. Action: To approve the City Attorney's suggestion. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered, noting the objection of Midstokke. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 6. POLICY ESTABLISHMENT FOR RED ZONE (NO PARKING) REDUC- TION. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated May 19, 1993. City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Public Works Director MacDonald and Acting Police Chief Straser also responded to Council questions. Planning Director Schubach said he thought it was pos- sible that the City could "bank" any additionally cre- ated parking spaces with the Coastal Commission. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, spoke of the problems in her area due to cars being locked in a parking spot without enough room to maneu- ver out, or of a car taking two spaces to be assured of room to maneuver out, because the street lines and buffer zones had been erased; Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, said the red zones at the easterly end of the walk streets were necessary to allow visibility both for scenic values and safety factors; Jerry Compton - 1723 Valley Park Avenue, said that the Vehicle Parking District had gained 75 spaces when it had restriped the downtown park- ing lots; and, Joseph Di Monda - 610 Ninth Street, agreed with Mr. Lissner that the red zones at the end of the walk streets were needed; said that Manhattan Beach had initially removed them, but, then had put them back. Action: To give direction that it is the Council policy to create as many parking spaces as possible within safety constraints, as follows: a) standard and minimum length of red curbing at STOP signs and corners to be the minimum length for safety as determined by the* City traffic safety engineer; City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 7 b) maximum and minimum size parking spaces to be a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 18 feet, with the understanding that staff has the discretion to increase the length for safety as determined by the City traffic engineer; c) the red zone on the curb between adjacent driveways that are separated by less than a compact stall is to be deleted; d) re -painting of no longer existing Ts and Ls is to be done to fit the new spaces; and, e) the red zone at the end of walk streets on the west side of Hermosa Avenue is to be continued. Motion Midstokke, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car- ried unanimously. 7. PROPOSED ORDINANCEPROHIBITING DOGS IN FORT LOTS -O -FUN AND SEAVIEW PARKS (TOT LOTS). Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 18, 1993. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jerry Compton - 1723 Valley Park Avenue, said that dog feces were a problem throughout City parks, especially at tot lots and school grounds; sug- gested that an ad campaign to alert people to the health dangers be undertaken. Action: To introduce Ordinance No. 93-1090, as amended to include the street designation with the tot lot parks, specifically 6th Street and Prospect with "Fort Lots -O -Fun" and 19th and Prospect with "Seaview". Motion Midstokke, second Edgerton. The motion carried unanimously. Final Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 93-1090, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY ,OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 22-3 OF THE PARKS REGULATIONS GENERALLY OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE." Motion Mayor Wiemans, second Edgerton. AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans NOES: None 8. REQUEST FOR DONATION: REDONDO UNION HIGH SCHOOL GRAD NIGHT. Memorandum from City Manager Frederick R. Ferrin dated May 18, 1993. City Manager Ferrin presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Joe Mark - 24th Street, Chairman of the Redondo City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 8. Union High School "Grad Night" Committee, spoke in favor of the City making a contribution in any amount to the drug and alcohol free party for graduating students; thanked the Council for its consideration., Action: To approve the staff recommendation that Coun- cil solicit private donations to assist the graduating seniors at Redondo Union High School with meeting the costs of a drug and alcohol free "Grad Night". Motion Essertier, second Benz. The motion carried unanimously. 9. REQUEST FOR DIRECTION: BILTMORE PARK DEVELOPMENT. Memo- randum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 18, 1993. Community Resources Director Rooney presented the staff report, responded to Council questions, and said there was $28,000 in the 1993-94 budget for the Biltmore Park. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Parker Herriott - 224 24th Street, asked that the park be developed as soon as possible; said it could be done in stages; felt that County Prop A funds could be used for development; said he had received pledges of money for the park be- fore the Prop A funds were approved by the voters; said that he had opened an account for donations with $25 of his own money but had never collected the pledges after Prop A was approved, but had asked the City for a mechanism for people to contribute with the donations being tax deductible. Action: To direct staff to come back to Council with cost proposals for grass and irrigation in the sand areas of the site, for approval to go out to bid as soon as possible, as the area was an eyesore. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered, noting the objection of Mayor Wiemans. Proposed Action: To direct staff to investigate setting up a fund to accept donations and to investigate the transactions and status of any contributions to Mr. Her- riott's fund. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. After discussion, there was no action taken on this motion. 10. CONSIDERATION OF LEGAL NOTICING CONTRACT ALTERNATIVES. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doerfling dated May 6, 1993. City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 9 Action: To direct the City Clerk to negotiate an exten- sion to the current contract for legal and display ad- vertising with the Easy Reader newspaper for the periods of one, two, and three years. Motion Essertier, second Benz. The motion carried, noting the dissenting votes of Midstokke and Mayor Wiemans. 11. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER City Manager Ferrin reported that there would be a bud- get workshop meeting on Thursday, June 3, 1993 at the hour of 7:30 P.M., but, starting with the first regular meeting of Tuesday, June 8, 1993 the starting time for the meetings would be 7:00 P.M. 12. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL (a) (b) Deadline for placement of measures on the November 2, 1993 ballot. Memorandum from City Clerk Elaine Doer - fling dated May 13, 1993. City Clerk Doerfling presented the staff report and re- sponded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to agen- dize, for the meeting of June 8, 1993, any items of interest, that are submitted in writing, for placement as measures on the November 2, 1993 ballot, with the understanding that a ballot measure will be presented by staff regarding the -lowered height in the R-3 zones from 35 to 30 feet. Motion Midstokke, second Mayor Wiemans. So ordered. Request for joint City Council/Planning Commission work- shop meeting. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 19, 1993. Action: Mayor Wiemans directed, with the consensus of the Council, to approve the Thursday dates of July 8, 15, or 22, 1993 for a joint workshop meeting with the Planning Commission. 13. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of alterna- tives to the Municipal Area Express (MAX) route that was discontinued. Councilmember Benz discussed his request for a shuttle bus service between the three beach cities. City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 10 Action: To have staff approach business leaders in the Chamber of Commerce and the Restaurant and Tavern Owners Association to see if there was interest in a shuttle between the three cities, and, to'come up with the pre- liminary figure to be funded from Prop A funds. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. So ordered, noting the objections of Midstokke and Mayor Wiemans. (b) Request by Councilmember Benz for discussion of going out to bid again for City Attorney. Councilmember Benz discussed his request; said the con- tract with the City Attorney had expired. City Attorney Vose said the original contract had no termination; the extension was an extension of his retainer and needed renewal only if that fee was to be increased; and, although he was eligible to ask for an increase in fee, he had refrained from doing so due to the financial problems of the City. (c) Proposed Action: To go out to bid for City Attorney services. Motion Benz, second Edgerton. The second was withdrawn and the motion died due to the lack of a second. Request by Councilmember Edgerton to schedule a hearing regarding reasons why conditional use permits are being required for the following businesses: Advanced Laminat- ing, Blue Sky Glass Tinting, Hermosa Silk Screen, Supreme Paint Corp.,. Johnson Fine Wood, Hap Jacobs Surf- boards, King Harbor Yacht Sales, Hermosa Fitness, Sun - Aired Bag Co., MultiVision Cable Co., Pier Music. Sup- plemental letter from June Williams, 2065 Manhattan Avenue, dated May 25, 1993. Councilmember Edgerton discussed his request and men- tioned that a number of the businesses listedabove were not to be included. Action: To have staff report on the reason a CUP is needed for these businesses, by categories, and to in- clude the staff report of June 24, 1990. Motion Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered, noting the objection of Mayor Wiemans. CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: David Gross - 1138 Manhattan Avenue, spoke of park- ing problems on Manhattan Avenue, felt resident permits should be given preference over busi- ness customers parking free in those areas, (Midstokke suggested placing yellow meters in the area); City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 11 Roger Bacon - 1100 Pacific Coast Highway, requested the final $1,100 allowable under the Council's appropriation for the southbound left turn lane on Pacific Coast Highway; and, Parker Herriott - 224 Twenty-fourth Street, asked for an agendized report on the amount in the Parks and Recreation fund; how much it would cost to do the Biltmore Park; and felt the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Ad- visory Commission should proceed with a park master plan. Councilmember Midstokke said she had reviewed the work on the Strand wall and was not satisfied with the work. Councilmembers Essertier and Benz concurred. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adjourned in memory of Vern High- field, 37 year City Public Works Department Supervisor; Mike Lines, 13 year City Firefighter; and Wilma Burt, 37 year resi- dent, on Tuesday, May 25, 1993, at the hour of 11:40 P.M. to a closed session for the purpose of discussion of Personnel mat- ters. The closed session adjourned on Wednesday, May 26, 1993 at the hour of 12:18 A.M. to the Regular Adjourned Meeting of Thursday, June 3, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 P.M., for the purpose of a continuation of the preliminary budget workshop. (491na, Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 05-25-93 Page 12 FINANCE-9FA340 TIME 09 58.41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H BANC ONE LEASING CORPORATION LEASE PMT/FY 92-93 22016 ••• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 03422 001-400-2201-6900 05/24/93 FIRE 00161 $39.770.24 /LEASE PAYMENTS H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 8YS. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PVB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 8Y8 IRETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PUD EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PUB -EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BY9. RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 H PUP EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 00026 05/25/93 00026 05/25/93 00026 05/25/93 00026 05/25/93 00026 05/25/93 00026 05/25/93 00026, 05/25/93 00026 05/25/93 00026 05/25/93 00026 05/25/93 00026 05/25/93 00026 05/25/93 INV/REF $39.770.24 001-400-1213-4180 00683 $3.977.09CR RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT 105-400-2601-4180 00206 $1.181.72 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT 109-400-3301-4180 00074 VEH PKO DIST /RETIREMENT 110-400-1204-4180 00011 FINANCE CASHIER /RETIREMENT $144. 27 *1.673.42 110-400-3302-4180 00215 03,249.60 PARKING ENE /RETIREMENT 115-400-8141-4180 00020 $89. 54 ST REHABILITATN/RETIREMENT 115-400-8144-4180 00020 $205.99 STRAND WALL /RETIREMENT 115-400-8178-4190 00020 $327.56 CTR MONUMENTS /RETIREMENT 155-400-2102-4180 00179 CROSSING GUARD 160-400-3102-4180 00207 SEWER/ST DRAIN 160-400-8408-4180 00019 SEWER IMPROVEMN 170-400-2103-4180 00077 SPEC INVEBTOTNS 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00129 '05/25/93 LIABILITY INS $102 61 /RETIREMENT 01,047.92 /RETIREMENT *89.54 /RETIREMENT $5.667.97 /RETIREMENT $259. 01 /RETIREMENT PAGE 0001 DATE 06/01/93 PO 0 CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 2222016 00052 44061 $0.'00 05/27/93 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 00000 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 44062 *0.00 05/27/93 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 44062 *0.00 05/27/93 44062 $0.00 05/27/93 lb I • 1. • I.,. I 41 • • • eb FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:58:41 • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION nnihrir CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0002 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO $P CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP H PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00131 $332.25 RETIREMENT/APRIL 93 05/25/93 WORKERS COMP /RETIREMENT *** VENDOR TOTAL**************************************************N*** *********tr+r** $10,394.33 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $50,164.57 * * * R A & E TROPHIES MISC.CHARGES/MAY 93 R A & E TROPHIES MISC.CHARGES/MAY 93 02744 001-400-1101-4319 00153 $19.71 05/15/93 CITY COUNCIL /SPECIAL EVENTS 02744 001-400-4601-4308 00831 $173.20 05/15/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES MISC.CHARGES/MAY 93 R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES MOTORCYCLE HELMETS R ADAMSON INDUSTRIES MOTORCYCLE HELMETS 00138 001-400-2101-4309 10339 05/06/93 POLICE $192. 91 00619 $149.95 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00138 170-400-2103-5401 00011 $137.41 8083 12/08/92 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $50 00138 170-400-2103-5401 00012 $189.23 9539 03/22/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EQUIPMENT -LESS THAN $50 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** * * * R I AMERICAN STYLE FOODS MISC.CHARGES/MAY 93 $476. 59 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01367 $63.00 8003 05/18/93 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R AT&T MISC.CHARGES/APRIL 93 05179 001-400-2101-4304 04/30/93 POLICE $63. 00 01227 . $11.91 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $11.91 R AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC ENG. CONTRACT/APR 6991 ' 04973 150-400-8151-4201 00011 $13,100.00 05/03/93 CIP 89-151 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0. 00 44062 05/27/93 00052 44144 $0.00 05/26/93 00052 44144 $0.00 05/26/93 10339 00053 44145 $0.00 05/26/93 8083 06118 44145 $0.00 05/26/93 9539 06118 44145 $0.00 05/26/93 '8003 00055 $0. 00 44146 05/26/93 00406 44147 $0. 00 05/26/93 6991 06542 44148 • $0.00 05/27/93 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:58:41 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 PAGE 0003 DATE 06/01/93 PAY VENDOR NAME VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL*********•***********************r+r+ri **********wit************ ****** $13, 100. 00 R BANC ONE LEASING CORPORATION 03422 001-400-2101-6900 00609 $9,230.00 00070 44149 LEASE PMT/1992-93 05/15/93 POLICE /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 05/26/93 R BANC ONE LEASING CORPORATION 03422 170-400-2103-6900 00022 $22,018.99 00070 44149 LEASE PMT/1992-93 05/15/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS /LEASE PAYMENTS $0.00 05/26/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL **+ **+t******+t#*##***1ta******.***#****#+r**##****#*********#********## $31,248.99 R DANK OF AMERICA 01195 001-400-1141-4201 00163 $2,341.65 06739 44150 CORP.BANK ANALYSIS/MARCH 05/26/93 CITY TREASURER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/27/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL*#***#***#*#*****#*#**********##*****************#*****#************ R DAVE*BEEMAN 05167 001-210-0000-2110 05321 FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54339 05/19/93 $2, 341. 65 $50.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $50.00 54339 06725 44151 $0.00 05/26/93 R BLICKMAN, INC. 03092 001-400-4601-4201 01777 $532.00 06674 44152 THEATER TECH/5-11TO 5/18 05/19/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/27/93 R BLICKMAN, INC. 03092 001-400-4601-4201 01779 $784.00 06673 44152 THEATER TECH/4/24 TO 5/8 05/19/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/27/93 R BLICKMAN`, INC. 03092 001-400-4601-4201 01781 $49.00 06661 44152 LIGHT TECH/5-10-93 05/13/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 ' 05/27/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,365.00 R STEPHAN*BOYLE 05168 001-210-0000-2110 05320 $50.00 54343 06727 44153 FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54343 05/19/93 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/26/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL**#*#***#**************************************************#+t******* $50.00 • R CA STATE UNIV DOMINGUEZ HILLS 00412 001-400-2101-4316 01027 $466.00 TUITION/LAVIN '05/18/93 POLICE /TRAINING • 00412 $0.00 44154 05/27/93 gib .10 VIP • • • • 0 • I NnNI. L :iI A.14 U 1 1 MI O4 '1l l: 4 1 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION (:11Y IU III1111IIIIA III AI.II 111.h1ANI) I.I:iI FUR 09/x!//93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/APRIL 93 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/APRIL 93 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE WATER BILLINGS/APRIL 93 (mu 11 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO $ CNK q AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $466.00 00016 001-400•-3101-4303 00276 $521.21 04/30/93 MEDIANS /UTILITIES 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00675 $490.01 04/30/93 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 00016 001-400-6101-4303 04/30/93 PARKS 00515 $2,921.95 /UTILITIES *** VENDOR TOTAL**********+********************************************************* R VICKI*CHANEY SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR *** VENDOR TOTAL ************* ** R COLEN AND LEE LIAB.ADMIN.PMT/JUNE 93 $3, 933. 17 05180 001-400-4601-4221 00225 $567.00, 05/13/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR ****************************************************** $567.00 04715 705-400-1209-4201 00373 $1,470.00 05/15/93 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PR1VAT VENDOR TOTAL ************************************** R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/MAY 93 56680 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/MAY 93 56680 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/MAY 93 56680 R CONNECTING POINT LEASING COMPUTER RENT/MAY 93 56680 ***************************** $1,470.00 03617 001-400-2101-4201 01267 $489.57 3956660 05/18/93 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03617 001-400-2201-4201 00387 $159.40 3956680 05/18/93 FIRE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 03617 05/18/93 03617 05/18/93 001-400-2701-4201 00077 $330.18 3956680 CIVIL DEFENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 170-400-2103-4201 00162 $159.39 3956680 SPEC INVESTGTNS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,138.54 R DAPPER TIRE CO. MISC.CHARGES/MAY 93 • 'Fteax,F;r- 01390 001-400-2101-4311 05/15/93 POLICE 01636 $332.20 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00411 44155 $0.00 05/27/93 00411 44155 $0.00 05/26/93 00411 44155 $0.00 05/26/93 06665 44156 $0.00 05/26/93 00042 44157 $0.00 05/27/93 00051 44158 $0.00 05/26/93 00051 44158 $0.00 05/26/93 00051 44158 $0.00 05/26/93 00051 44158 $0.00 05/26/93 00519 44159 $0.00 05/26/93 • er FINANCE-SFA340 TIME .09 58: 41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION r.• VENDOR TOTAL R DATA SAFE TAPE STOR./ 5/11-6/10/93 72778 . ••• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND K ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00156 05/11/93 PAGE. 0005 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO k CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *332.20 001-400-1206-4201 01125 •184.00 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R DECAL MANIA POLICE CAR DECALS 19 -IN ••• VENDOR TOTAL 02522 001-400-2101-4309 04/02/93 POLICE $184.00 72778 00015 44160 $0.00 05/27/93 00621 $59.30 3619 -IN 06200 44161 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $59.30 05/27/93 R DENN ENGINEERS STRAND BIKEWAY PMT. 3698 ••• VENDOR TOTAL *59. 30 05094 115-400-8144-4201 00009 *4,100.00 04/19/93 STRAND WALL/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE 1y, SHELTER COSTS/APRIL 93 4.404' VENDOR TOTAL $4, 100. 00 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00216 *178 98 05/10/93 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION COMP SYS.MAINT/APRIL 55493 R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION (COMP. SYS. MAINT/APRIL 55493 4040• VENDOR TOTAL R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY METER USAGE/DEC. 92 05103 R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY COPIER MAINT./JAN. 93 05103 R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY METER 'USAGE/MARCH 93 65423 00269 001-400--2101-4201 01266 05/10/93 POLICE 00269 001-400-2201-4201 00386 05/10/93 FIRE $178 98 3698 06525 44162 $0.00 05/26/93 00014 44163 $0.00 05/26/93 $913 32 343755493 00007 44164 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 05/27/93 *608.87 343755493 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT ' 02840 001-400-1208-4201 00999 04/30/93 GEN APPROP 02840 001-400-1208-4201 01000 04/30/93 GEN APPROP 02840 001-400-1208-4201 01001 ".04/30/93 GEN APPROP $1,522. 19 $235 B0 6M05103 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *298.00 6M05103 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $263 39 6M65423 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00007 44164 *0.00 05/27/93 00425 44165 $0.00 05/27/93 00425 44165 $0.00 05/27/93 00425 44165 $0.00 05/26/93 • • s FINANCE-SFA340 rime 09 58.41 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 PAGE 0006 DATE 06/01/93 PAr VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK M DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 02840 001-400-1208-4201 01002 $298 00 6M65423 00425 44165 COPIER MAINT./APRIL 93 65423 04/30/93 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/27/93 ••• VENDOR TOTAL $1,095.19 R EASTMAN, INC. 02514 001-400-1208-4305 01217 $396.07 10475001 00524 44166 MISC CHARGES/MAY 93 75001 05/13/93 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 05/26/93 ••• VENDOR TOTAL ••• $396.07 R EASY READER 00181 001-400-1121-4323 00232 $818.37 00426 44167 MISC.CHARGES/APRIL 93 04/30/93 CITY CLERK /PUBLIC NOTICING $0.00 05/26/93 VENDOR TOTAL *818.37 R EMMA CORPORATION 05181 115-400-8144-4201 00011 $172,767.78 3619 -IN 06539 44168 STRAND BIKEWAY/PMT. 1 19 -IN 05/20/93 STRAND WALL/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE $0.00 05/27/93 ••• VENDOR TOTAL R JERRY•GELBWACH 05169 001-210-0000-2110 05317 FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54342 05/19/93 ••• VENDOR'TOTAL $172,767.70 $50.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK. GUARANTEE $50.00 54342 06731 44169 $0.00 05/26/93 R GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING 04959 001-400-4201-4305 00861 $18 00 05808 44170 1REQUEST RECEIPT 11/16/92 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 05/27/93 R GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING 04959 001-400-4201-4305 00862 $24.00 05808 44170 REQUEST RECEIPT 11/16/92 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 05/27/93 R GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING 04959 001-400-4202-4305 00765 $18.00 05808 44170 REQUEST RECEIPT 11/16/92 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 05/27/93 ••• VENDOR TOTAL $60.00 R GREG SAMPSON . 05175 001-210-0000-2110 05311 $50.00 54334 06720 44171 FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54334 05/19/93 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/26/93 4 • • • • a • • • • • • S • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09 58'41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION •w* VENDOR TOTAL R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC.CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R :GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R ,GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY R GTE CALIFORNIA, MISC. CHARGES MAY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 INCORPORATED 93 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00557 05/13/93 CITY COUNCIL 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00629 05/13/93 CITY CLERK 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00467 05/13/93 CITY ATTORNEY 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00650 05/13/93 CITY TREASURER 00015 05/13/93 00015 05/13/93 001-400-1201-4304 00702 CITY MANAGER 001-400-1202-4304 00702 FINANCE ADMIN 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00712 05/13/93 PERSONNEL. 00015 05/13/93 00015 05/13/93 001-400-1206-4304 00633 DATA PROCESSING 001-400-1207-4304 00503 BUS LICENSE 00015 001-400-1208-4304 00297 05/13/93 GEN APPROP 00015 001-400-2101-4304 01226 05/13/93 POLICE 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00539 05/13/93 FIRE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00541 05/13/93 ANIMAL CONTROL ,00015 001-400-4101-4304 00705 '05/13/93 PLANNING PAGE 0007 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *50. 00 *5. 62 /TELEPHONE *21. 35 /TELEPHONE *2. 66 /TELEPHONE *7. 56 /TELEPHONE *11.26 /TELEPHONE $45.25 /TELEPHONE $106.46 /TELEPHONE *12.2. 14 /TELEPHONE *12. 57 /TELEPHONE *3.91 /TELEPHONE *731.66 /TELEPHONE $82. 14 /TELEPHONE *12. 69 /TELEPHONE *119 32 /TELEPHONE • 00530 44173 *0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 *0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 *0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 *0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 *0. 00 05/26/93 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 *0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 *0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 *0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 *0. 00 05/26/93 A • • • • • • • • • • • r • r sr • FINANCE-9FA340 TIME 09:58:41 • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED MISC.CHARGES MAY 93 R • GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED MISC.CHARGES MAY 93 P. GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED MISC.CHARGES MAY 93 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED MISC.CHARGES MAY 93 R GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED MISC.CHARGES MAY 93 R • GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED MISC.CHARGES MAY 93 •w* VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00015 001-400-4201-4304 .00635 05/13/93 BUILDING 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00766 05/13/93 PUB WKS ADMIN 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00813 05/13/93 COMM RESOURCES 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00503 05/13/93 PARKS 00015 05/13/93 $164 98 /TELEPHONE $334. 08 /TELEPHONE $136.52 /TELEPHONE $2. 66 /TELEPHONE 110-400-1204-4304 00031 $158. 19 FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00727 •127.15 05/13/93 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE R .GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 R GTEL PHONE 9Y9.MAINT/MAV 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 R GTEL 'PHONE 5Y9. MAINT/HAY 93 GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAV 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAV 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAV 93 R GTEL • PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 ti 01340 05/10/93 001-400-1101-4304 00558 CITY COUNCIL 001-400-1121-4304 00630 CITY CLERK 001-400-1131-4304 00468 CITY ATTORNEY 001-400-1141-4304 00651 CITY TREASURER 001-400-1201-4304 00703 CITY MANAGER 001-400-1202-4304 00703 FINANCE ADMIN 001-400-1203-4304 00713 PERSONNEL PAGE 0008 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO * CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $2,208.17 $3.62 /TELEPHONE $9.82 /TELEPHONE *5.17 /TELEPHONE $9.82 /TELEPHONE 41E1.78 /TELEPHONE $34.60 /TELEPHONE $12.40 /TELEPHONE 001-400-1206-4304 00634 $14.98 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE • 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00530 44173 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 4 S. FINANCE-SFA340 O'• TIME• 09.58:41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 R OTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/HAY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAV 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 R GTFL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 R GTEL • PHONE SYS.MAINT/HAV 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 R GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAV 93 GTEL PHONE SYS.MAINT/MAY 93 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 001-400-1207-4304 00504 BUS LICENSE 001-400-1208-4304 00298 GEN APPROP 01340 001-400-2101-4304 01228 05/10/93 POLICE 01340 001-400-2201-4304 00540 05/10/93 FIRE 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 001-400-2401-4304 00542 ANIMAL CONTROL 001-400-4101-4304 00706 PLANNING 001-400-4201-4304 00636 BUILDING 001-400-4202-4304 00767 PUB WKS ADMIN 001-400-4601-4304 00814 COMM RESOURCES 01340 001-400-6101-4304 00504 05/10/93 PARKS 110-400-1204-4304 00032 FINANCE CASHIER 01340 05/10/93 01340 05/10/93 110-400-3302-4304 00728 PARKING ENF R HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. STREET SWEEPER PARTS r** VENDOR TOTAL 7656 00731 001-400-3101-4311 00060 05/11/93 MEDIANS $9.82 /TELEPHONE $5.17 /TELEPHONE $195 27 /TELEPHONE $5.17 /TELEPHONE $5. 17 /TELEPHONE $25. 31.. /TELEPHONE $44 94 /TELEPHONE $50.10 /TELEPHONE $14. 98 /TELEPHONE $5.17 /TELEPHONE $31. 00 /TELEPHONE • *25. 31 /TELEPHONE $516.60 $2,880.25 /AUTO MAINTENANCE R CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH WORK COMP CLAIMS/MAY 93 $2,880 29 PAGE 0009 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO * CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00290 $11,447 36 05/24/93 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0. 00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067- 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 00067 44175 $0.00 05/26/93 7656 06086 44176 $0.00 05/27/93 05576 44177 $0.00 05/27/93 1 4 .4 a 4 4 a a 41 • • • • S S • • I • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:58:41 • PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 4441 VENDOR TOTAL R HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/5-1 TO 5-16-93 1 • *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT PROD * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DATE INVC 00243 001-202-0000-2030 05/20/93 PAGE 0010 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO M CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $11,447.36 00554 $282,913.57 /ACCRUED PAYROLL R DAVE*HULSEBUS FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND R DAVE*HULSEBUS FORFEIT FEE 54340 *** VENDOR TOTAL $282, 913. 57 05170 001-210-0000-2110 05306 $50.00 05/19/93 05170 001-300-0000-3893 05/19/93 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 01587 $25.000R /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES R JAMES V.*HURLEY, III FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54338 *** VENDOR TOTAL 03783 001-210-0000-2110 05308 05/19/93 *25. 00 44178 $0.00 05/27/93 06730 44179 $0.00 05/26/93 54340 06730 44179 $0.00 05/27/93 $50.00 54338 06724 44180 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISC. OFFERED/HAV 93 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISC. TAKEN/MAY 93 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 'MTSC CHARGES/MAY 93 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC.CHARGES/MAY 93 *** VENDOR TOTAL *50.00 02458 001-202-0000-2021 00414 *1.85 05/15/93 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 02458 001-202-0000-2022 00412 *1.85C8 05/15/93 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 02458 001-400-4204-4321 00724 $17.19 05/15/93 BLDG MAINT /BUILDING SAFETY/SECURIT 02458 105-400-8201-4309 00065 *73.58 05/15/93 CIP 85-201 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS R JAMESTOWN PRESS BUDGET BOOK PRINTING 26127 *** VENDOR TOTAL $90.77 04908 001-400-1101-4305 00483 *568.31 05/14/93 CITY COUNCIL /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R DAVID L.*JOHNSON *568. 31 *0.00 05/26/93 00537 44181 $0.00 05/26/93 00537 44181 *0.00 05/26/93 00537 44181 *0.00 05/26/93 00537 44181 *0.00 05/26/93 26127 05660 *568. 31 05171 001-210-0000-2110 05310 $50.00 54336 06722 FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54336 05/19/93 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE *0.00 44182 05/27/93 44183 05/26/93 FINANCE-SFA340 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TIME 09 58 41 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0011 FOR 05/27/93 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK N �•� DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ; • 14 DATE 06/01/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL R ALAN*KAN SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR *** VENDOR TOTAL $50. 00 03376 001-400-4601-4221 00227 $210.00 06666 44184 05/13/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROR $0.00 05/27/93 $210. 00 R KELLY PAPER COMPANY 00212 001-400-1208-4305 01219 $820.54 COPIER PAPER/STOCK 52416 05/05/93 QEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 252416 0565844185 •820..5S4 05/27/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL R STAN*KIM TENNIS TOURNEY DIRECTOR R STAN*KIM SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR *** VENDOR TOTAL $820.54 02833 001-400-4601-4201 01778 $400.00 06668 44186 05/17/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/27/93 02833 001-400-4601-4221 00228 $119 00 06667 44186 05/17/93 COMM RESOURCES /CUN1RAC7 REC CLASS/PRGR $0.00 05/27/93 R ED*KUSHIN9 $519.00 ANIMAL TRAP REFUND 60013 05/72 2/93 001-210-0000-2110 05314 $50.00 60013 06717 44187 1/DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/26/93 R ED*KUSHINS 05172 001-300-0000-3895 00087 ANIMAL TRAP USE FEE 60013 05/19/93 $7.50CR 60013 06717 44187 /ANIMAL TRAP FEE $0.00 05/26/93 rww VENDOR TOTAL $42.5.0 R KAREN*1 A MAR FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54341 r** VENDOR TOTAL ww* 05173 001-210-0000-2110 05316 450.00 54341 06732 44188 05/19/93 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/26/93 R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REO/S.KEARIN VENDOR TOTAL $50.00 00317 110-400-3302-4316 00231 4125.00 05/24/93 PARKING ENF /TRAINING 4125.00 06811 $0.00 44189 05/27/93 CO OF*LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN 05161 001-400-3104-4251 00127 • HWY MONITOR SERV. 10081 04/29/93 TRAFFIC SAFETYT510081 85 5 /CONTRACT S• SERVICE/GOVT •85 00..00 05/ 44190 ERV/27/93 . ,.rr•••: R« ... Id .. rn 4 a • • • • • • • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09:58:41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 PAGE 0012 DATE 06/01/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO Si CHK M DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *850. 00 R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 001-400-2101-4305 01988 $193.05 00546 44191 MISC.CHARGES/MAV 93 05/15/93 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $0.00 05/26/93 R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 001-400-4201-4311 00347 $3. 16 00546 44191 MISC CHARGES/MAY 93 05/15/93 BUILDING /AUTO MAINTENANCE *0.00 05/26/93 R MANHATTAN FORD 00605 105-400-2601-4311 00326 *46.68 00546 44191 MISC CHARGES/MAY 93 05/15/93 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE *0.00 05/26/93 *** VENDOR TOTAL *242. 89 R KENNETH A.*MEER9AND 04138 001-400-1132-4201 00139 *5,600.00 54332 03802 44192 LEGAL SERV./APRIL 93 54332 05/12/93 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 05/27/93 Mwr VENDOR TOTAL *5,600.00 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. 03080 001-400-4205-4310 00262 $675.17 930440 06509 44193 MOTOR OIL/CITY YARD 30440 05/03/93 EQUIP SERVICE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 05/27/93 +** VENDOR TOTAL *675. 1 7 R BRENDAN«MOIR04660 001-400-4601-4201 01780 $55.00 06651 44194 THEATER TECH/3-23 TO 25 05/06/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 05/27/93 «*« VENDOR TOTAL *55. 00 R MONARCH BROOM 00084 001-400-3103-4309 01518 *844 36 00549 44195 MISC.CHARGES/MAV 93 05/15/93 BT MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *0.00 05/26/93 *M* VENDOR TOTAL M41-****4**44***** *844.36 R SEAN*MORRISON 04999 001-210-0000-2110 05307 *50.00 54333 06734 44196 REFUND FORFEIT DEPOSIT 54333 05/19/93 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/27/93 *50. 00 **« VENDOR TOTAL R MYERS TIRE SUPPLIES CO. 05134 001-400-4205-5402 00029 $2,754.97 1489• 072-0 06092 44197 TIRE BALANCER/GARAGE 072-0 04/30/93 EQUIP SERVICE/EQUIPMENT-MORE THAN *500 $2.754.96 05/27/93 1 • • I • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 09.58:41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION •** VENDOR TOTAL R NATIONAL REC Re PARK A890C PUBLICATIONS/ROONEY ••• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0013 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 42,754.97 00880 001-400-4601-4316 00181 $58.84 05/19/93 COMM RESOURCES /TRAINING R YVONNE*NORTE 04226 001-210-0000-2110 05/19/93 FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54347 05318 $50.00 54347 06729 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 ••• VENDOR TOTAL $58. 84 06675 44198 40.00 05/27/93 R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMP. HOOKUPS/MAY 93 *•• VENDOR TOTAL ••* 450. 00 00321 001-400-2101-4304 01225 4152,37. 05/07/93 POLICE /TELEPHONE R PHOENIX GROUP OUT—OF—ST.CITE PMT/APRIL VENDOR TOTAL $152.37 02530 110-400-1204-4201 00018 $1,185.90 05/17/93 FINANCE CASHIER /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R PRECISION DYNAMICS CORP. WRIST BANDS/SUMMER PROD. 24632 ••• VENDOR TOTAL 41, 185. 90 05160 001-400-4601-4308 00835 $190.03 05/07/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS PRESENTATION PRODUCTS, INC KROV TAPES/STOCK ••* VENDOR TOTAL 61029 01176 05/10/93 001-400-1208-4305 01218 GEN APPROP R JOHN*PROUT FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54330 ••• VENDOR TOTAL 03302 001-210-0000-2110 05/19/93 4190. 03 $219. 52 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $219. 52 44199 05/26/93 00036 44200 $0.00 05/27/93 00063 44201 $0.00 05/26/93 224632 06633 44202 $186.52 05/26/93 61029 05659 44203 40.00 05/26/93 05322 450.00 54330 06736 44204 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/27/93 R GARRICK*RAWLINGS 04222 001-210-0000-2110 FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54345 05/19/93 450. 00 05319 $50.00 54345 06728 44205 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 40.00 05/26/93 I 1 • • • •l •' v v • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09 58:41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION •** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROD M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R CITY OF*REDONDO BEACH DISC.SUDREOIONAL GRANT R CITY OF*REDONDO BEACH DISC. FAREBOX RECOVERY R CITY OF*REDONDO BEACH WAVE SERV/JAN-MARCH 93 *** VENDOR TOTAL INV/REF $50.00 03282 146-300-0000-3121 00002 $4,767.44CR 05/19/93 /SUBREGNL.IN 03282 146-300-0000-3854 00006 S2,601.30CR 05/19/93 /FARES, DIAL A RIDE 03282 146-400-3401-4251 00011 $40,708.50 05/19/93 DIAL A RIDE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R REGENTS OF UNIV OF CALIFORNIA TUITION/CARUSO *** VENDOR TOTAL $33,339.76 02456 001-400-2101-4316 01028 $325.00, 05/17/93 POLICE /TRAINING R F. W. *ROBERTS, JR. • FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54335 ••• VENDOR TOTAL $325.00 PAGE 0014 DATE 06/01/93 PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 05825 44206 $0.00 05/26/93 05825 44206 $0.00 05/26/93 05825 44206 $0.00 05/26/93 06805 44207 $0.00 05/27/93 05174 001-210-0000-2110 05315 $50.00 54335 06733 44208 05/19/93 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/26/93 R SYLVIA*ROOT SEC. SERV. /5-4-93 R SYLVIA*ROOT SEC SERV./ 5-18-93 VENDOR TOTAL 504 518 04061 05/06/93 04061 05/21/93 001-400-4102-4201 00408 PLANNING COMM 001-400-4102-4201 00409 PLANNING COMM $50.00 $285.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT •284 25 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R DWAIN*ROGUE SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR •44 VENDOR TOTAL $569.25 02859 001-400-4601-4221 00726 $225.23 05/05/93 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PRGR R SARCO INC. GAS MASKS/POLICE 11225.23 504 05824 44209 $0.00 05/7/93 518 05826 44209 $0.00 05/27/93 06640 44210 *0.00 05/26/93 05093 170-400-2103-5401 00013 $1,380.00 58022 06175 58022 04/02/93 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EOUIPMENT-LESS THAN $50 $1,400.00 44211 05/26/93 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 095841 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R SCOTTISH FIDDLERS OF L. A. DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 58110 *** VENDOR TOTAL R R CITY OF HERMUSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * • AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 05176 001-210-0000-2110 05/19/93 PAGE 0015 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1,380.00 05313 $500 00 58110 06718 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 . SHORELINE PRINTING FORMS/POLICE. 10030 $500.00 03505 001-400-2101-4305 01989 $248.98 05/10/93 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-4201-4305 00859 $162.38 FORMS/BUILDING 10027 04/29/93 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R. SHORELINE PRINTINQ CORRECTION FORMS/BUILDIN 10026 *** VENDOR TOTAL 03505 001-400-4201-4305 00860 $173.20 04/29/93 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R GARY*SIMPSON FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54332 *** VENDOR TOTAL R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY MISC.CHARGES/MAY 93 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY ,MISC.CHARGES/MAY 93 *** VENDOR TOTAL 04231 001-210-0000-2110 05323 05/19/93 *584. 56 44212 05/26/93 10030 06186 44213 $248.98 05/26/93 10027 04288 44213 $162.38 05/26/93 10026 04287 44213 $173.20 05/26/93 *50.00 54332 06735 44214 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/27/93 00114 001-400-2101-4306 05/15/93 POLICE *50. 00 01368 *89 20 /PRISONER MAINTENANCE 00114 001-400-4601-4308 00832 $56 01 05/15/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS R SOUTH RAY HOSPITAL. DISCOUNT OFFERED R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL DISCOUNT OFFERED R SOUTH RAY HOSPITAL DISCOUNT TAKEN 00107 001-202-0000-2021 05/10/93 00107 001-202-0000-2021 05/17/93 . 00107 001-202-0000-2022 '05/10/93 00416 00417 00414 *145. 21 *77.61 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $36. 92 DISCOUNTS OFFERED *77. 61CR • /DISCOUNTS TAKEN • MarreriletgallitrilIMIMPROMMINVIIRINFIMPOIrirlignr, 4, .7., 7'. r racer wrrr.m *. ... 00562 44215 *0.00 05/26/93 00562 44215 *0.00 05/26/93 06198 44216 $0.00 05/26/93 06803 44216 *0.00 05/27/93 06198 44216 $0.00 05/26/93 1111 w r IP • • • • 4 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09.58:41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL DISCOUNT TAKEN R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING R SOUTH BAY HOSPITAL BLOOD ALCOHOL TESTING ••• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00107 001-202-0000-2022 05/17/93 00107 001-400-2101-4201 05/10/93 POLICE 00415 *36.92CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN PAGE 0016 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO N CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 01269 $144.14 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00107 001-400-2101-4201 01270 *68 58 05/17/93 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT CITATION COURT BAIL ••• VENDOR TOTAL •i* 00400 110-300-0000-3302 05/27/93 *212. 72 51278 *40.00 /COURT FINES/PARKING R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC. BILLINGS/MAY 93 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC. BILLINGS/MAY 93 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC. BILLINGS/MAY 93 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC. BILLINGS/MAY 93 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLINGS/MAY 93 R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC. BILLINGS/MAY 93 VENDOR TOTAL 00159 05/10/93 00159 05/10/93 00159 05/10/93 00159 05/10/93 00159 05/10/93 00159 05/10/93 *40. 00 001-400-3101-4303 00277 *101.32 MEDIANS /UTILITIES 001-400-3104-4303 00165 $564.21 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES 001-400-4204-4303 00676 $8,123. 19 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 001-400-6101-4303 00516 $1,594.10 PARKS /UTILITIES 105-400-2601-4303 00435 $241.26 STREET LIGHTING /UTII..ITIES 160-400-3102-4303 00234 $83.46 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STREET LIGHTING/APRIL 93 •** VENDOR TOTAL 1110,707.54 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00434 $8,564.48 05/01/93 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES R SOUEEKERS & HERB TENNIS TOURNEY T-SHIRTS • $8,564.48 03480 001-400-4601-4308 00833 *159 13 1244 05/14/93 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 06803 44216 *0.00 05/27/93 06198 44216 *0.00 05/26/93 06803 44216 *0.00 05/27/93 06422 44217 *0. 00 05/27/93 00566 44218 $0.00 05/26/93 00566 44218 *0.00 05/26/93 00566 44218 *0. 00 05/26/93 00566 44218 $0.00 05/26/93 00566 44218 $0.00 05/26/93 00566 44218 $0.00 05/26/93 00012 44219 $0.00 05/26/93 • 1244 06671 44220 $0.00 05/26/93 4 4 le a • • • • • S 0 • S S • S FINANCE-SFA340 TIME•09.58:41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION •ws VENDOR TOTAL R R R CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION DISCOUNT OFFERED M5637 STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION DISCOUNT TAKEN M5637 STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION FLARES/POLICE M5637 +*• VENDOR TOTAL 02993 001-202-0000-2021 00415 05/12/93 02993 001-202-0000-2022 00413 05/12/93 02993 001-400-2101-4309 05/12/93 POLICE INV/REF *159. 13 PAGE 0017 DATE 06/01/93 PO M CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *6.56 305M5637 06191 DISCOUNTS OFFERED *0. 00 *6.56CR 305M5637 06191 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 00620 4649.16 305M5637 06191 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4660.25 R WHITw9TROBEN FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54331 R WHIT*STROBEN FORFEIT FEE 54331 •*• VENDOR TOTAL 04995 001-210-0000-2110 05/19/93 04995 001-300-0000-3893 05/19/93 05312 "r $649. 16 44221 05/26/93 44221 05/26/93 44221 05/26/93 450.00 54331 06719 44222 /DEPOSITS/WORK' GUARANTEE $0.00 05/26/93 01588 *25.000R 54331 06719 44222 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 05/26/93 R RODNEY•SUGIYAMA FORFEIT DEPOSIT REFUND 54337 **♦ VENDOR.TOTAL 04861 001-210-0000-2110 05309 05/19/93 *25. 00 $50 00 54337 06723 44223 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/26/93 R SUMITOMO BANK 'LEASE PMT/JUNE 1993 +w• VENDOR TOTAL *50. 00 04751 001-400-3104-6900 00125 *855 11 05/15/93 TRAFFIC SAFETY /LEASE PAYMENTS R SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. MOVIE/"KIDS KLUB" 04131 +** VENDOR TOTAL 03158 05/18/93 001-400-4601-4308 00834 COMM RESOURCES *855. 11 *113.00 /PROGRAM MATERIALS R TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION, INC. COMPUTER TUNING/APRIL 93 1152 03421 001-400-2101-4201 04/30/93 POLICE *113.00 01268 4200.00 /CONTRACT SERVICE/FRIVAT 2r"."�r-�qrw. s 00066 44224 *0. 00 05/26/93 604131 06656 44225 $113.00 05/26/93 1152 00069 *0. 00 44226 05/26/93 I.� .• • • • • •S 1)4 411 V Id 0 • • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09-58:41 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 PAGE 0018 DATE 06/01/93 PAY VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP ••• VENDOR TOTAL $200.00 R TEMAR COMMUNICATIONS 05162 001-400-2401-5401 00019 $200.26 38597 06194 44227 ANSWER MACH/BASE 3 38597 05/05/93 ANIMAL CONTROL /EQUIP -LESS THAN $500 $0.00 05/26/93 ••• VENDOR TOTAL •••-••••. ••M•• $200. 2!, R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-202-0000-2021 00418 $0 38 DISCOUNT OFFERED 04/30/93 DISCOUNTS OFFERED R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-202-0000-2022 00416 50.38CR DISCOUNT TAKEN 04/30/93 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY 00124 001-400-6101-4309 01411 $18.73: MISC.CHARGES/APRIL 93 04/30/93 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS ••• VENDOR TOTAL $18.73 00473 44228 $0.00 05/27/93 00473 44228 $0.00 05/'27/93 00473 44228 $0.00 05/27/93 R UNION METAL CORPORATION 00405 115-400•-8144-4201 00010 $2,383.60 302680 06088 44229 STRAND PROSPECT SUPP. 02680 05/01/93 STRAND WALL/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE $2,420.47 05/26/93 ••• VENDOR TOTAL $2. 383. 60 R UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE 04768 001-400-1206-4201 01124 $1,080.00 9527 00009 44230 COMP.SYS.MAINT/JUNE 93 9527 05/13/93 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/27/93 ••• VENDOR TOTAL $1. OBO. 00 R VICTEL-SOUTH BAY 03598 001-400-2101-4305 01990 $49. 79 4218 06192 44231 TONER KIT/POLICE FAX MAC 4218 04/28/93 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $49.79 05/26/93 ••• VENDOR TOTAL $49.79 R WESTWOOD BUILDING SUPPLY 03739 105-400-8201-4309 00066 0519.60 39076 06508 44232 SONA TUBES/WIRING 39076 04/22/93 CIP 85-201 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $519.60 05/26/93 ••* VENDOR TOTAL R WHITMORE, JOHNSON & BOLANOS LEGAL SERV/ APR. 93 $519. 60 05129 001-400-1203-4201 01033 $7.789.59 05577 44233 05/24/93 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/27/93 9 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 111 'FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 09' 58:41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL *** *** R R R R JOHN PETTY R JOHN PETTY R JOHN PETTY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/27/93 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMS. JOHN M. *WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. JOHN M. *WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMS. M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH CASH REIMB. M. *WORKMAN, PETTY CASH CASH REIMS. M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH CASH REIMB. JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. R JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. VENDOR TOTAL 05125 05/26/93 05125 03/26/93 05125 05/26/93 05125 05/26/93 05125 05/26/93 05125 05/26/93 05125 05/26/93 05125 05/26/93 05125 05/26/93 001-400-1204-4305 00009 PAGE 0019 DATE 06/01/93 INV/REF PO * CHK AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 07.789 59 *15. 11 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 001-400-1205-4305 00155 CABLE TV *34.62 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 001-400-2101-4310 00404 *12.42 POLICE 001-400-2101-43,6 POLICE 001-400-3104-4309 /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES 01029 $8.00 /TRAINING 01061 *35.07 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-4201-4305 00863 BUILDING 001-400-4202-4316 00266 *4. 00 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *21. 00 PUB WKS ADMIN /TRAINING 001-400-4205-4309 00723 $41.97 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 001-400-4601-4305 01151 *10. 18 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES PAY CODE TOTAL *** TOTAL WARRANTS wriampqrs,...TMIMTIENIMIAMIMME."4FT,FTIMISITn• 7: $182.37 $624, 604. 05 $674,768.62 06738 44234 *0.00 05/27/93 06738 44234 $0.00 05/27/93 06738 44234 *0.00 05/27/93 06738 44234 $0.00 05/27/93 06738 44234 *0.00 05/27/93 06738 44234 *0.00 05/27/93 06738 44234 $0.00 05/27/93 06738 44234 $0.00 05/27/93 06738 44234 $0.00 05/27/93 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS COVERED BY THE RANTS LISTED WARRANTRREG REGISTER FOR ON `gvl✓7 1T0/ . ARECACCIPRA E. EF THE FUNDS ARE AVA,LArILE WIT PAM! IIT, AND ARE IN (.(,NFn RMANCE TO IHE BJJDGET. BY FINAN'E I1 DATE ___ 6V/AKa - _ • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 22, 1993 June 3, 1993 City Council Meeting of June 8, 1993 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Parking lot and 2 -way thoroughfare vicinity of 2nd & 3rd Streets at Pacific Coast Highway Public Hearing Hearing for budget adoption Hearing to review delinquent refuse charges for consideration of placing said charges on the tax rolls as a special assessment Appeal of Oil Drilling Conditional use permit July 13, 1993 Approval of litigation defense firm list July 22, 1993 City Council/Planning Commission Workshop July 27, 1993 August 10, 1993 Lease renewal for Hope Chapel (Rooms 5 and 6A) August 24, 1993 September 14, 1993 Lease renewal for Association for Retarded Citizens Lease renewal for Easter Seal Society Lease renewal for South Bay Center for Counseling September 28, 1993 City Mgr./Bldg./ Public Works Building Director Planning Director' Risk Manager Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. Community Resources Dir. December , 1993 Lease renewal for Project Touch (Room C) Community Resources Dir. *****************,*********************************************** UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED Initiated by Party Staff Caltrans utility maintenance agreement Public Works Dir. Staff Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Public Works Dir. Text amendment re. grade definition, fencing and barbed wire require- ments in conjunction with oil development Planning Director Confirmation of oil development C.U.P. approved by P.C. Planning Director Council Review Bldg/Zoning Code changes to improve liveability Planning Director Council Revision of HBMC provisions per- taining to construction of public street improvements (Public Hrg) Public Works Dir. Staff Request for approval of Tenant/ Users Liability Insurance Program (TULIP) and establishment of an administrative fee for processing TULIP applications Personnel Director Staff Final public hearing for Land Use Element Planning Director Staff Payroll software selection Finance Director Staff Special study re. standards for small lots Planning Director Special study of the zoning ordi- nance and enforcement ordinance re. parking in front yard setback Planning Director School District request for Grounds Maintenance provided by the City Comm. Resources Dir. Council Amendment to Ord. 93-1084 allowing vehicle parking on public street r -o -w along walkstreets on west side of Beach Drive Planning Director Staff Staff A:FUTURE Review of commercial beach events policy, with Ordinance Comm. Resources Dir. County Safe Neighborhood Park Act (Grant -Prop A) application for Greenbelt acquisition and municipal pier renovation Comm. Resources Dir. June 3, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Meeting of June 8, 1993 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT OF INACTIVE PUBLIC DEPOSITS FOR HERMOSA BEACH Attached is the report of all Inactive Public Deposits for the month of May 1993. This is the most current available investment information. Respectfully submitted, M. Workman C y Treasurer Noted: Frederick R. Ferrin Cirt Manager ld INSTITUTION TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT - MAY 1993 DATE OF DATE OF INVESTMENT MATURITY ASKING PRICE MARKET VALUE INTEREST LAIF BALANCE 5/1/93 Investment BALANCE 5/31/93 1 LACPIF Railroad Right -of -Way Account BALANCE 5/1/93 Investment BALANCE 5/31/93 U.S. TREASURY BOND Investment Investment Investment INVESTMENT TOTAL SEATTLE 1ST NATL. BANK TRUST BALANCE 4/1/93 Adjustment BALANCE 4/30/93 56,690,000.00 2,400,000.00 05/20/93 59,090,000.00 51,355,945.55 5,261.94 5/17/93 51,361,207.49 51,005,937.50 5989,687.50 1,008,437.50 513,455,269.99 09/14/90 12/03/92 02/18/93 5521,697.99 40.96 04/30/93 5521,738.95 04/29/93 06/30/94 11/30/97 01/31/98 4.61% 3.51% 51,005,937.50 51,061,560.00 8.50% S 989,687.50 S 997,810.00 6.24% 1,008,437.50 998,490.00 5.625% 8.40% CHICAGO TITLE IALANCE 12/01/92 BALANCE 12/31/92 TRUSTEE TOTAL GRAND TOTAL Respectfully Submitted, 511,921.08 512,084.52 5533,823.47 513,989,093.46 June 1, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Beach City Council June 8, 1993 APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES, INC. FOR SPACE IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER (Room 6B) RECOMMENDATION The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff recommend that Council approve the lease agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and the Los Angeles County Bar Association Dispute Resolution Services to lease Room 6B in the Community Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached lease. BACKGROUND Dispute Resolution Services has leased Room 6B in the Community Center since October, 1988. Their current lease, which conforms to the present square footage lease for Community Center rooms, will expire on June 30, 1993. ANALYSIS The recommended lease is for a period of one year (July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994). The rate for FY 1993-94 will be $.87 per square foot, making the monthly lease payment $174. DRS has proven to be dependable and cooperative tenants and have made all lease payments as requested. DRS provides a service whose goal is to resolve local disputes in order to improve community and neighborhood relations and to circumvent potentially escalating conflicts. Fiscal Impact: $2,088 Estimated annual revenue to the General Fund. Concur: Respectfully ubmi arsha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Mary . •o.-ey, Director /}�_• Comm nity Resources Dept. ��- Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 1 .Niki Copeland, Director Finance Dept. le HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 8th day of June 1993 , by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Los Angeles County Bar Assoc. Dispute Resolution Services, Inc. (DRS) (Lessee). A. RECITALS: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Com- munity Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the -City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TERM. The term of this lease shall be for a period of 1 year commencing on the 1st day of July ,1993 , and ending on the 30th day of June ,1994 . 2. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 6B, 200 Sq. Ft. 3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent ac- cording to the following schedule: $174/mo. ($.87 per sq. ft.) Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental pay- ment on the first day of the following month. 1 3A. OTHER CONDITIONS. The following additional condi- tions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises except such signs showing the business of the Lessee. All such signs shall be in accordance with the policy established by the Lessor. 4. USE. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Mediation Program And for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Depratment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa - Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 5. INSURANCE LIABILITY. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a com- bined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected ' officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at'all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. J. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Work- er's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and fur- nish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. INSURANCE COMPANIES. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. CONDITION OF THE PREMISES UPON TERMINATION OF THE LEASE. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good con- dition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Les- see took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon de- mand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. CONSTRUCTION. Lessee is prohibited from making any al- terations or performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. DESTRUCTION, PARTIAL DESTRUCTION OR NECESSITY TO REPAIR BECAUSE OF CONDITIONS CAUSED BY OTHER THAN LESSEE. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the prem- ises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction or repair if such reconstruc- tion or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion. determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be termi- nated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. HOLD HARMLESS. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any di- rect or indirect act or any omission of the lessee, its of- ficers, agents and employees arising out of the lessee's use of said premises. The lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all actions, suits or other pro- ceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Com- munity Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. TAXES AND CHARGES. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. DEFAULT. Should. Lessee fail to pay any monies due pur- suant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. NOTICE. Any notice required to be made or given pur- suant to the provisions of this lease may be either personal- ly served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, LESSOR: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 LESSEE: Los Angeles County Bar Assoc. Dispute Resolution Services 617 S. Olive-St./P. 0. Box 55020 Los Angeles, CA 90055-0020 Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may not assign or sublease all or any portion of the premises without the writ- ten consent of the City, which consent may be granted or de- nied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. SUCCESSORS. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first hereinabove set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: • Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 1, 1993 City Council Meeting of June 8, 1993 RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO HMC GROUP FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS FOR THE POLICE STATION REMODEL, PHASE III Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council award a contract to HMC Group for the preparation of plans for the police station downstairs remodel, Phase III. Background: At the Council meeting of April 27, 1993, the police department was authorized to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) seeking a firm to prepare architectural and engineering plans for the final phase of the downstairs remodel. The RFP was dispatched on April 28. A total of 14 firms responded and received our rough draft plan. Each toured the areas involved to determine the scope of the work to be performed. Of those 14, eight (8) firms responded with proposals by the deadline on Monday, May 24, 1993. A staff panel, consisting of Charles McDonald, Public Works Dir- ector, William Grove, Building Director, Val Straser, Acting Chief of Police, and Wally Moore, project coordinator, reviewed the proposals individually. The proposals were graded and rated based on the criteria set forth in the RFP. The firm receiving the highest rating was HMC Group, based in Ontario. They submitted a very complete and detailed proposal to complete the project within our time schedule. Their lump sum cost is $18,900. Their overall rating was 91.75. The firm receiving the second highest rating was PEHA & Assoc- iates with a score of 88.75. Their proposed cost was $14,600. Third in scoring was Van Roon Architects with a rating of 87.75. Their total proposal was $13,200. The remaining five (5) firms received ratings ranging between 75.75 to 87.50. Proposed costs ranged between $26,900 to $49,350. Analysis: Staff spent nearly four hours reviewing all proposals in detail. It was the consensus that the HMC Group proposal was the most complete in addressing our needs. In 1992, the firm was rated nineth in the Nation. - 1 - if Although PEHA & Associates and Van Roon Architects submitted lower lump sum cost proposals, which raised their rating scores, their individual proposals were not as complete as the HMC Group plan. HMC lost 6 points in rating based on cost and still placed first in overall rating 3 points ahead of PEHA. It is staff's analysis that HMC Group will provide the best professional service to the city based upon their written proposal. Resectfuully submitted: Concur: k/P rj //144264 -- Val Straser Acting Chief of Police Attachment: (1) Contract Rick Ferrin City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Oh: Caitc.¢aiCov Viki Copeland Finance Director CONTRACT CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CONTRACT FOR PREPARING ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS FOR THE POLICE STATION REMODEL, PHASE III. CIP 92-619. THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into this day of , 1993 by and between the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," and HMC Group, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Contractor has responded to a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the City, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", for professional services in the preparation of architectural and engineering plans for the police station remodel, Phase III, and WHEREAS, City staff has reviewed Contractor's proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit "BTM, and found the proposal detailed and complete in performing the required professional services, and WHEREAS, City desires to contract with Contractor to perform the services detailed in Exhibits "A" and "B", and WHEREAS, Contractor has represented that they are fully qualified to assume and discharge such responsibility: NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES: City hereby employs Contractor to fulfill all commitments made in their proposal, Exhibit "B", and to furnish all labor and materials in order to complete construction ready plans no later than 5 PM on Monday, August 2, 1993. 2. COMPENSATION: In consideration of the services rendered hereunder, Contractor shall be paid, according to the prices as submitted in the Bid Proposal, a total lump sum cost of $18,900, for professional services including Architectural, Structural, Mechanical, and Electrical plans, for the Scope of Services as described in the Request for Proposals. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days after satisfactory completion of Contractor's services. Contractor shall provide City, no later than July 26, 1993, Construction Administration costs, if required at a later date by the City, on an hourly rate/not to exceed basis. 3. HOLD HARMLESS; It is specifically understood and agreed by all parties hereto that Contractor is, for the purposes of this contract, an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Accordingly, Contractor shall not be deemed the City's employee for any purpose whatsoever. Contractor shall not incur any debt, obligation, claims, liens, or causes of actions, arising out of or related to Contractor's services hereunder. 4. ASSIGNMENT: This contract may not be assigned by Contractor, in whole or in part, without the prior consent of City. Any subcontractor or associate utilized by Contractor shall be certified and approved by the City's project manager and shall be responsible to Contractor for payment of services rendered, if any. 5. TERMINATION: This contract may be canceled by City at any time without penalty upon thirty (30) days' written notice. In the event of termination without fault of Contractor, City shall pay Contractor for all services rendered prior to date of termination, and such payment shall be in full satisfaction of all services rendered hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the within contract the day and year first above written. Exhibits "A" and "B", by reference herein, are contained as if fully set forth in this contract. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY: MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACTOR: BY: 3r 6-3 May 7, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the City Council of June 8, 1993 FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE SPRINT TRIATHLON RECOMMENDATION • It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff that Council approve the following request from Fleet Feet Triathlete to sponsor a sprint triathlon in the City of Hermosa Beach on Sunday, October 17, 1993 and to authorize the Mayor to sign the attached contract. Date: Group: Event: Fees: (estimated) BACKGROUND October 17, 1993 Fleet Feet Triathlete Sprint Triathlon $3,065 At their meeting on Monday, May 17, 1993 the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommended approval of the request from Fleet Feet Triathlete, for a Sprint Triathlon to be held on Sunday, October 17, 1993. Micheal Epstein, event coordinator for Hermosa Beach Fleet Feet Triathlete, filed an application with the Department of Community Resources to hold an annual sprint triathlon in Hermosa Beach in the fall of 1993. Co -sponsoring the event will be Project Touch, a Hermosa Beach based non-profit organization. The proposed triathlon will consist of: 1. 1/4 mile swim 2. 9 mile bike ride (a portion will be in Redondo Beach). 3. 3 mile run 4. Post event activities including sand castle building contest and volleyball contest. A map of the race course is attached for Council review. ANALYSIS The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommends the approval of this event for the following reasons: 1. A local Hermosa Beach business is sponsoring the event. 2. The event will benefit a Hermosa Beach non-profit organization. 1 lz 3. The race length, course, day and time proposed would have minimal impact on the City. 4. A triathlon would provide the City with an exciting sporting event. 5. The event organizers have proven to be responsible and responsive in their operation. They have conducted ,two coordinated events in Hermosa Beach, the 1991 Splash and Dash and the 1992 Hermosa Beach Sprint Triathlon. Hermosa Beach Fleet Feet Triathlete (73 Pier Avenue) has been in operation since August of 1990. They have sponsored the Sand and Strand Run for the past three (3) years and co-sponsored the Splash and Dash in July of 1991. The event co-sponsor, Project Touch, plans to incorporate the race in their program goals and objectives. The philosophy of Project Touch is that fitness may be used as an alternative to unstructured, unsupervised leisure time. Several youths will be offered the opportunity to be trained by experienced triathletes and will be provided with scholarships for participation. The Hermosa Beach Sprint Triathlon would consist of a maximum of 500 participants competing for first through fifth place in their respective age division. It is estimated that approximately 500 spectators will attend. • Staff determined that the event coordinator, Micheal Epstein, held a successful race last year in the City. Although there were a few logistical concerns with last year's race (i.e. amplification of sound and with some residents having difficulty exiting their streets), event personnel have developed plans to mitigate these problems. This plan includes keeping sound amplification to a minimum; improved notification for residents along the race route and some revisions in route operation. With the proposed race schedule, there will be minimal impact on the City in terms of traffic flow and parking. The race will begin on Sunday at 7:30 a.m. Participants will start in heats of 50 in three (3) minute increments with the entire event concluding by noon. It is noteworthy that the City's schedule of races has diminished .in recent years (i.e. the City no longer hosts two 10K runs). Due to this fact, the calendar is open for this type of event. If approved, this Hermosa Beach event will be the only triathlon in the South Bay Area benefiting the large population of triathletes. Other alternatives for Commission consideration include: 1. Deny this event. 2. Request additional information Fiscal Impact: Total ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application 2. Course Map 3. Contract Concur: $1,627 event permit fee $1,200 police fee (estimated) $ 38 sound fee $ 200 parking meters (estimated) $3,065 • Respectfully submitted, Mar , Director Co munity Resources Department \JluG�,uc� /C V„c Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 3 G A. Newell creation Specialist Community Resources Department Noted for fiscal impact: 0-444:(4114.414,01-1 Viki Copeland, Director Finance Department City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 318-0280 SPECIAL EVENT PERHIT APPLICATION Organization's Name: Fleet Feet Triathlete Profitx Non -Profit Non-profit Number Organization's Address: 73 Pier Ave. Hermosa Beach, CA Zip Code 90254 Phone Number(s): 798-1255 or Michael Epstein at (818) 880-4915 Contact Person and Title: Michael Epstein -Event Coordinator Contact Person's Address: P.O. Box 9122 Calabasas , CA Zip Code 91372 Daytime Phone Number: 880-4915 Evening Phone Number: 880-4915 Brief Description of Event: Sprint Triathlon (2nd Annual) Date(s) of Event: October 17th, 1993 Location(s) of Event: Staged at Pier ave. and the Strand. See attached map. Set-up Time: 12:00 noon - October 16th. ime Event f s.to Commence: 7:30 am October 17th. 1993_ 48-0MmOop lfalaWMIrMa&rra®aiail.MM MIIMfa•4IWWU a IIIMUl5 1I t 1 W '1 ' 1 • ! 1 1 • T ' " , Number of Participants (Including volunteers): Anticipated Number of Spectators: 500 600 Number of Vehicles Involved and How Used: 4, One truck for race equipment, 3 motorcycles to -monitor course. Description of Set-up for this Event: Staging area - snow fencing, bike racks, finish line, PA system, banners, stage for awards. Bike course - Cones to separate bikers from cars. Run Course - Cones to indicate direction, aid station at turnaround. Additional Information or Special Requests: Fees, Charges and Other Requirements: Police Costs Fire Costs Business License Public Works Costs Processing Fee Other Costs $ $ Total Due $ Refundable Damage Deposit $ Insurance Required: Yes No Date Received Unless greater or lessor coverage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa beach evidence of $1 million comprehensive general liability insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City of Hermosa Beach and its employees as additional insured. Expiration Date Permittee waives claims against the City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees, for fees or damages caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND TO RETURN SAID PREMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER NECESSARY MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND/OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES. Company Representative Date Permit to be processed through City Council: Yes No If YES, Council's decision: Application is invalid without the following signatures: Department of Community Date Resources Police Department Date Authorization Fire Department Date Authorization if Required Life Guard Authorization Date N N N I)/ 'W £ — vnx Sad w b _ N N 3 cm en 0 y0 PACIFIC AVE sI''7 -rj ).V O 6S vi a fi "ujJ �fT nail ap � I ms ^ ads -> / �4� 1l� ..moo ��K E ' �. n ..... .rte �r �.. Nd! o. a 1 Z� --_ 4,-::;;7:-7,1 llA: i i / -�' �pF n 0 -_.A�11�5 oke- PL , LA CARLITA PL • ., v SU5 NAV vSHADYCOWARMSIDE AVE .REDBEAM AV BLVD WRESTEST J(11 EYNOLDS LEYTE N GRANT AVE KENT AVE ALISMAN Alin- ir -Zi ES .� ��77.�,yy77 i �, 1.., i ? m� ��avF v -6 Nut 1° IM dt4%.r 4gLTR-'� 114 ."--A con lin x .tI . a4A 3i1W01 jnV p 331 WI TiTwD i T fp $ `A z an D3.avw - A it < •+.'fl,r'v y9 5`Y 3nV3yF+•'" - ' tr s z ' nD �.ONn z4 AVE �' tT J • ALD WENDY TYNE l .e� %� 9'P w.lFlf 7`�F R-�,i-••� ANNRITA 1 • Y%'Ey f� 9MASO i l r -T : t • p HENRI TTo-tft�m� PaaT E AVE Po pp L p t l s 2 i •i•+l:A AVEVACCAROAV rfi T =I _ r �. T 0 �K WOOD zAVE N o i y PL �b SAVE WOOD y o f TRADERO PAVE = r E R DER VI T. > ST = HINSDALEA :(111:10.4 * Pd . -1 N• DONOR AVE > DONORA 4 >r (�`dbp d i PHEW/ •- 3 .,d 1r -- a-- _ �° tlp N779 AVE • pL,. 1 ; anv ZA (`2 AVT n � y y YANln � Y.. 1. LA DUNE ;°1►'e PRUITi ., LADEENE AVE =Oz ♦ `r AVE ^Y; BEILEMA•F �� •' , INGLEW••' Or INR. Dy • M ST i•LES�mAN' 4yI —o �+�•11►�Ili FIS f PERKINS A GREVILL A MEYER EN PHELAN CHA, LA AL TU YA z :LAUR PACIFIC031 moo-iiia mom POINSETTIA JILT �y DIAN HUSND.41341/1i PINE 1 1 A SON Dq�isn OAK EUN ®2 -- BLVD s �" N f ,1i rt AZ�,L � 9'111 r � Y1N��S D %ON ST , D j X1111 1 ul ARE.. 1111111 111 II N r81O•.OM 1'1'• A IiI/4LI'!' 1!!!111 TON LN 11 INGLEW000�e!CONOERRIN ST CARV R ST WOILAG•TTST 11A IA.N PECK VIALN ERRIN CARRIAGE PLROWELL HAKN 5S PE KINS A E SERMON LYN GROVE AVIAI DR FREEMAN BLVD MOO NOSRIG 0110111 KINGSDALE AVE a REVILL HERMOSA BEACH FLEET FEET SPRINT TRIATHLON CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT CONTRACT This contract is entered into on June 8, 1993, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between the HERMOSA BEACH FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regard to the FLEET FEET SPRINT TRIATHLON on October 17, 1993. FEES Permit fee shall be $1,627. A non-refundable application processing fee of $500 will be required. The deposit will be applied toward the permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs/fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the CITY on behalf of the event shall be paid within 15 days of, receiving an invoice from the CITY. SECURITY/TRAFFIC CONTROL The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide as many officers as deemed necessary by the Public Safety Director for the event and all cost of officers shall be assumed by FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE. CLEAN-UP FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE will clean the area following the event and provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: . Pier Avenue (impacted area) . Beach (impacted area) . Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall assume all costs for lifeguards required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. The County shall have the authority to cancel or re-route the swim portion of the race depending on surf conditions. The CITY requires written confirmation from the County on the number of Lifeguards needed to insure maximum safety for the summer event. INSURANCE Thirty (30) days prior to the Event, FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall provide the CITY a Certificate of Insurance providing liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles their officers, employees and agents as 1 additional insured with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE insurers.shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. Said insurances shall not be canceled or terminated without at least ten (10) days written notice to the CITY. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of-. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE its agents, officers and employees, including, but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. All participants will be required to show waivers on behalf of the CITY. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE will assume full responsibility for insuring the waivers are signed by said participant and shall assume cost for reproduction of the waivers. ADVERTISING City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for event. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE. PARKING FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall be required to direct participant parking in. CITY lots through advertising and race flyers. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall post temporary "No Parking" signs along race course where appropriate. All costs -to reserve parking will be paid by FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE. The CITY shall allow access to Tournament site for set-up twelve (12) hours prior to the event. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for event staging area. 2 No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID AGREEMENT. MISCELLANEOUS FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE RESPONSIBILITIES FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall notice affected residents/businesses of race. City staff will determine areas to be noticed. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall provide as many portable port -a -johns as determined necessary by CITY staff. FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and personnel necessary for conducting such an event... Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances on file at the Department of Community Resources. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: DATE: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH By MAYOR CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES DIRECTOR FLEET FEET TRIATHLETE PRESIDENT DATE: 6.73/ ge--) X93-Sd�a 6--Y-13 May 28, 1993 Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the City Council June 8, 1993 RESOLUTION: PROPOSITION A (LA COUNTY SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ACT OF 1992) Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council adopt the attached resolution to be included in the City's Prop A application packet to be submitted in order to collect the $2.48 million for Hermosa Valley Greenbelt acquisition. Background In November, 1992 LA County voters approved Proposition A which created a benefit assessment district county wide to fund recreation projects with regional significance. Written into this measure were specific projects throughout the County that were approved by the Board of Supervisors to be funded with the passage of the measure. City of Hermosa Beach projects that were specifically listed in the measure included: $2.48 million for Greenbelt Acquisition and $1.5 million for Municipal Pier renovation (see Attachment B). Analysis In order to collect the funds for each of the projects, the City must submit an application that includes support documentation and a resolution from the City Council (a copy of the application packet and a sample agreement are on file at the City Clerk's Office for review). Once received, the County will draft a formal agreement that will be presented to City Council for review and approval. Staff is requesting the application for the Greenbelt money be filed immediately as the acquisition is already set. The application for the Pier renovation will be submitted when the preliminary design process (Pier competition and Council approvals) is complete as the application will require a site plan and cost estimate. County staff has indicated that the Board of Supervisors is anxious to release funds as soon as possible in order to stimulate the region's economy. At best, funds for the specific projects will be available beginning in July, 1993 but there may be delays due to the issuance of bonds and other County procedures. pagel 1h Information regarding the one time per capita allocation of approximately $240 thousand has not yet been distributed to agencies. Staff will keep the Council apprised of all developments on County Proposition A funds as they arise. Fiscal Impact: 82.48 million to the Park Fund for Greenbelt acquisition (will reduce UUT payments to the acquisition). It is likely that the City will be paid in increments (retroactive to November, 1992) rather than in a lump sum as the measure operates on a reimbursement basis, however, staff is working with County personnel to determine if there are other alternatives. Obviously it would be to the City's advantage to collect these funds on a lump sum basis in order to reduce debt service payments. Respectfully Submitted, M. ooney unity Resources Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: b.:14,:edteite.kita.) Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES REGIONAL PARK AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SPECIFIED PROJECT GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE HERMOSA VALLEY GREENBELT ACQUISITION WHEREAS, the people of the County of Los Angeles on November 3, 1992, enacted Los Angeles County Proposition A, Safe Neighbor- hood Parks, Gang Prevention, Tree -Planting, Senior and Youth Recreation, Beaches and Wildlife Protection, which provides funds to the County of Los Angeles and other public agencies in the County for the purposes of acquiring and/or developing facilities for public recreational facilities and open space; and WHEREAS, the Proposition also created the County of Los An- geles Regional Park and Open Space District to administer said funds; and WHEREAS, the District has set forth the necessary procedures governing local agency applications for grant funds under the Proposition; and WHEREAS, the District's procedures require the Applicant to. certify, by resolution, the approval of the application before submission of said application to the District; and WHEREAS, said application contains assurances that the Appli- cant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into an Agreement with the District to provide funds for acquisition or development of the Project; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City of Hermosa Beach HEREBY: 1. Approves the filing of an application with the County of Los Angeles Regional Park and Open Space District for funds under Section 8.b.2 of Proposition A for the above Project; and 2. Certifies that said Applicant understands the assurances and certifications in the application form; and 3. Certifies that said Applicant has, or will have, suffi- cient funds to operate and maintain the Project in perpe- tuity; and 4. Appoints the Mayor as agent of the City of Hermosa Beach to conduct all negotiations, and to execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so forth, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforemen- tioned Project. PASSED AND ADOPTED on this 8th day of June 1993. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FDRM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: JUNE 7, 1993 MEMBERS RE: COUNCIL ITEM 1H FROM: MARSHA ERNST If RESOLUTION: PROPOSITION A COMMUNITY RESOURCES On the June 8th Council agenda item 1H "Resolution: Proposition A (LA County Safe Neighborhood Park Act of 1992)" Attachment "B" was not included with the packet. Please place the attached with that item. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. SUPPLEMENTAL ih INFORMATION 1 Attachthent "B" APPENDIX A LIsr OF SPECIFIED PROJECTS (Excerpt from the Safe Neighborhood Parks Proposition of 1992) (Sections 8.a.1, 8.a.2, 8.b.2 and 8.d) J. One million four hundred seventy thousand dollars ($1,470,000) to the City of Diamond Bar for the development of Pantera Park. K. One million eight hundred sixty thousand dollars ($1,860,000) to the City of Downey for the construction of the Downey Community -Senior Center. L. Six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) to the City of Duarte for the development of the Duarte School Sports Facility. M. Eight hundred fifty thousand dollars ($850,000) to the City of Gardena for the development and restoration of the Willows Wetlands Wildlife Preserve. N. Three million three hundred thirty thousand dollars ($3,330,000) to the City of Glendale in accordance with the following schedule: i. One million eight hundred sixty thousand dollars ($1,860,000) for the development of the Freeway Park Sports Complex. ii. One million four hundred seventy thousand dollars ($1,470,000) for development of Deukmejian Wilderness Park, including trails and public access, in the City of Glendale. Two million seventy thousand dollars ($2,070,000) to the City of Glendora in accordance with the following schedule: . Six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) for the construction of La Fetra Senior Recreation Center. ii. One million four hundred seventy thousand dollars ($1,470,000) for the acquisition of critical wildlife habitat and natural lands. P. One million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) to the City of Hawthorne in accordance with the following schedule: Q. i. Five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) to rebuild the Hawthorne Youth Camp Lodge. ii. One million dollars ($1,000,000) for the development of the Eucalyptus Recreational Complex. Three million nine hundred eighty thousand dollars ($3,980,000) to the City of Hermosa Beach in accordance with the following schedule: A5 APPENDIX A LIST OF SPECIFIED PROJECTS (Excerpt from the Safe Neighborhood Parks Proposition of 1992) (Sections 8.a.1, 8.a.2, 8.b.2 and 8.d) i. Two million four hundred eighty thousand dollars ($2,480,000) for the acquisition of the Hermosa Beach Valley Greenbelt. ii. One million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) for the restoration and rehabilitation of the Hermosa Beach pier and waterfront. R. Five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) to the City of La Habra Heights for the restoration and improvement of Hacienda Park. S. One million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($1,750,000) to the City of Lakewood in accordance with the following schedule: i. Eight hundred fifty thousand dollars ($850,000) for the renovation of McCormick Pool. ii. Nine hundred thousand dollars ($900,000) for development of Mayfair High School Sports Complex. T. One million eight hundred sixty thousand dollars ($1,860,000) to the City of , Lancaster for the acquisition of and development of public access to Prime Desert 4 Woodland Preserve habitat.• U. Nineteen million six hundred sixty thousand dollars ($19,660,000) to the City of Long Beach in accordance with the following schedule: i. Eleven million four hundred sixty thousand dollars ($11,460,000) for Westside Park Acquisition. ii. Six million two hundred thousand dollars ($6,200,000) for the development of El Dorado Regional Park. iii. One million dollars ($1,000,000) for the expansion and development of Martin Luther King, Jr. Park. iv. One million dollars ($1,000,000) for the development and rehabilitation of Belmont Pier. V Ninety-seven million dollars ($97,000,000) to the City of Los Angeles in accordance with the following schedule: i. Two million two hundred thousand dollars ($2,200,000) for the development of Elysian Park. Honorable Mayor and Members of The Hermosa Beach City Council May 25, 1993 Regular Meeting June 8, 1993 C-4-9/ REQUEST FOR 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT OF ONE COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council extend for thirty days (30) days the temporary appointment of one Community Services Officer. Background: There is currently one vacant Community Services Officer (formerly General Services Officer) which is being filled on a temporary basis pending completion of current reorganization which is in progress. Analysis: Section 2-33 of the Hermosa Beach City Code precludes a temporary appointment of an individual to a permanent Civil Service position for more than six months without approval from the City Council every thirty days. Respectfully submitted t,,ry Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director wp/extend Concur: Frederick R. Few—' City Manager ii June 1, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 8, 1993 REPORT ON REQUIREMENTS FOR SURFACE FINISHING THE STRAND WALL Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council allow the Contractor to complete the wall finish in accordance with the project specifications. Background: The City Council has expressed concern about the finish and the color on the wall. The current status is that the contractor has removed the forms and, at this writing, no finish work has been commenced. There are form marks, recesses for snap -tie cones, burrs, air bubbles, a small amount of honeycomb with some variation in color. Analysis: In order that the City Council will understand the nature of the work yet to be done according to the specifications they are briefly paraphrased as follows. The project requirements are the application of an "Ordinary Surface Finish (303-1.9.2)" plus a "Class 1 Surface Finish (303-1.9.3)". "Ordinary Surface Finish": 1. Clean bolt holes and fill with mortar. 2. Rub with carborundum stone to obtain uniformity of color. 3. Fins and projections shall be removed. 4. All pockets shall be cleaned and filled with mortar. "Class 1 Surface Finish": 1. Sand entire surface with a power sander to obtain a uniform color and texture. 2. Remove unsightly bulges or irregularities. 3. Class 1 surface finish shall not be applied until 30 days after the concrete has been exposed to the elements. 4. Continue finish work until a smooth even surface of uniform appearance with no unsightly bulges is obtained and depressions due to form marks and other imperfections are repaired. 1 I J Substantial improvement will be seen when the contractor completes the finish operation. Respectfully stmitted, Concur: nx/PC__- harles McDonald Director of Public Works ty/cmwal1 2 Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 6-g -9-3 June 2, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 8, 1993 APPOINTMENT TO THE PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL (PIC) OF THE JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT (JTPA) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council appoint Mr. Rick Learned to represent the City of Hermosa Beach business community on the Private Industry Council of the Job Training Partnership Act (J.T.P.A.). Background: The City of Hermosa Beach is a participating agency in the JTPA, South Bay Service Delivery Area (SDA). Under the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement which formed the South Bay SDA, each member City agreed to appoint a representative of the private sector business community to the Private Industry Council (PIC). This City's previous appointee was Mr. Scott Ingel whose term ends July 1, 1993. The PIC has policy and oversight responsibilities for local programs. It is comprised of twenty-one (21) members with a simple majority of members from the private sector and includes representatives from education, labor, rehabilitation agencies, community-based organizations, economic development agencies, and employment service agencies. Analysis: Carol Hunt, Executive Director of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, has solicited from the local business community for nominees to the PIC. The attached letter from Ms. Hunt presents the Chamber's nominees: Mr. Rick Learned of Learned Lumber in Hermosa Beach, and Mr. Bob Jensen, Area Representative for Southern California Edison. The recommendation to select Mr. Learned is based upon his expressed interest in the appointment, as well as his involvement with the business interests of this community. This appointment is to serve the July 1993 through June 1997 term. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director PIC/rab Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager lk HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 323 PIER AVENUE HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254 (310) 376-0951 • FAX (310) 798-2594 June 2, 1993 Robert Blackwood Director of Personnel CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 RE: Private Industry Council Representative Dear Bob: Thank you for the opportunity to recommend representatives to the Private Industry Council. Two outstanding business leaders are well-qualified to serve in the position. The following individuals have indicated a willingness to serve on the council: Rick Learned,_ 1992/93 President, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Learned Lumber - P.O. Box 3117 Redondo Beach 374-3406 or Bob Jensen, Director Hermosa. Beach Chamber of Commerce Area Representative for Southern California Edison P.O. Box 2944 - Torrance 90509 783-9392 Again, thank you for extending this opportunity to us. If you need for information, please contact me. Sincerely, HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Carol Hunt Executive Director K.� Immun May 28, 1993 Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the City Council June 8, 1993 DATA PROCESSING INTERIM NEEDS Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council approve an authorization of $5,000 from the AB 702 funds to be used to purchase two additional work stations and scanner software for the existing PC network. Background Council has allocated up to $200 thousand of AB 702 funds for the PC network currently operating as a pilot program in City Hall. Per the data processing subcommittee's recommendations, Council authorized an expenditure of $7,000 from the AB 702 funds to purchase miscellaneous items (hard drives, virus protection software, etc.), three (3) PC work stations (for satellite offices) and a printer. These items have been ordered and should be fully installed in the short term. Analysis Staff anticipates the newly established contract employee position (network technician) to be filled by September, 1993. This employee will have the responsibility of completing the City's PC system. In the meantime, however, staff efficiency would be enhanced greatly with the above listed items. These work stations would be added to the network: one in the Council Chambers (that will add to the efficiency of Council minutes) and one in Planning (for the scanner). Scanner software will enable staff to make full use of the scanner to manipulate documents easily. While staff recognizes that the purchase of an additional two (2) work stations will bring the total expenditures (including funds already spent from the initial allocation) for computers past the $5,000 threshold, since the City is authorized to make purchases from vendors on the LA County bid list 1 1 (obtained through a formal bid process), a duplicate process in Hermosa Beach is not necessary. Taking advantage of the extremely competitive margins the County can receive (as they are the largest buyer from certain companies) the City has been able to improve our bidding strength. Fiscal Impact: Impact on AB 702 allocation of $5,000. Remainder of funds = $188 thousand for FY 93-94 (will be reflected in future budget documents). Respectfully Submitted, Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Noted for fiscal impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director June 1, 1993 City Council Meeting June 8, 1993 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 93-1090 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 22-3 OF THE PARKS REGULATIONS GENERALLY OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 93-1090, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of May 25, 1993, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration, was amended to include park locations, and was then introduced by the following vote: AYES: Benz, Edgerton, Essertier, Midstokke, Mayor Wiemans NOES: None ABSENT: None _ ABSTAIN: None , ,ALA.) id/o--g/L- Elaine Doerfling, 'ity terk Concur: ,/1.4-44..2X9.•=1LA--) Frederick R. Ferrin, City Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 93-1090 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 22-3 OF THE PARKS REGULATIONS GENERALLY OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, discussions regarding amending the Parks Regulations Generally section were held by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission on January 21, 1993; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to assure the safety of small children within the City's parks. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THE FOLLOWING TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE: SECTION 1. That Chapter 22 Section 22-3 of the Municipal Code is hereby amended to add as follows: Section 22-3. "Park regulations generally." "(w) Lead or let loose any dog on or off leash in Sea View (19th and Prospect) and Fort Lots -o -Fun (6th and Prospect) parks." SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption,. the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Sth day of June 1993. PRESIDENT, of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Cerv4 DRAFT � Y ORDINANCE NO. 93 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION TO REPLACE THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS • WHEREAS, the Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District No. 1 was established in 1964 in a defined geographical area of downtown Hermosa Beach pursuant to the Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943 (California Streets and Highway Code, Section 31500 et seq.), and; WHEREAS, a separate Board of Parking Place Commissioners - was appointed by the, City Council pursuant to the Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943; and WHEREAS, there is a need to expand the permissible range of activities under the jurisdiction of the current Board of Parking Place Commissioners that can be performed by such district within the borders of the geographical district constituting the current Vehicle Parking District No. 1 including, but not - limited to, operation, management and. control of parkingplaces, promotion of public events which benefit businesses within the district, promotion of tourism and business within the area, capital improvement projects within the district, and activities which benefit businesses generally located and operating in the area; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization of businesses in general and the 1 SUPPLEMENTAL,c�' INFORMATin�� 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRAFT `-(*4 physical appearance and maintenance of the downtown business district of the City of Hermosa Beach in the area now known as Vehicle Parking District No. 1 in order to create jobs, attract new business, and expand the existing tax base•for the City of Hermosa Beach ; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to replace the existing Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District No. 1 and in its place establish a Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission as a separate commission with the authority to set parking policy on the public lots within the district, super- vise and control parking places within the district and make recommendations to the City Council on the leasing of said parking lots, acquisition of additional parking places and the expenditure of revenues to promote the enhancement of business in general and the physical appearance of the district; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires and agrees to dedicate to the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission all revenues heretofore accumulated by the Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District No. 1 as well as those revenues which• will henceforth be accumulated from the operation of the public parking lots (Parking Lots A, B, C and H) within the district, for use in implementing those recommendations to be made to the City Council by said Commission for the purposes specified herein and for no other purpose; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRAFT 7# l( SECTION 1. Article XV of Chapter Two of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "ARTICLE XV. DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION Sec. 2-140. Created; Composition; Terms There is hereby created a Downtown Business Area Enhance- ment District Commission which shall initially consist of the five (5) current members of the Vehicle Parking District until the conclusion of their current terms of office. Commission members shall serve for a period of four (4) years and no member shall remain on said commission for a period of time longer than two (2) consecutive terms. If a vacancy shall occur otherwise than by expiration of term, it shall be filled by appointment by the city council for the unexpired portion of the term. Upon the expiration of a full term, each member of the commission shall serve until a successor is appointed and qualified, except that in the event, of a written resignation filed with the city manager. and accepted by action of the city council, said resignation shall - become effective on the date set forth therein. Two (2) absences from regularly scheduled meetings of any member within one (1) calendar quarter, and/or four absences from regular meetings within one (1) calendar year creates an automatic vacancy. There shall be no distinction between excused or unexcused absences. When an automatic vacancy occurs, the staff liaison shall promptly notify the city 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FT-# V council, the commission and the member. The automatic vacancy shall not be effective until council receives notice and fails to waive application of this section. The city council may waive application of the automatic vacancy upon its own motion; otherwise the vacancy so created shall be filled pursuant to this section: Commissioners shall be persons of business experience and ability. Commissioners may be owners or lessees of .real property within the district. Commissioners meeting these requirements may be residents or non-residents of the City of Hermosa Beach. Sec. 2-141. .Declaration of Purpose. The City Council finds and declares that it is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization and physical appearance and maintenance of the business districts in the city in order to create jobs, attract new businesses, and prevent erosion of the business districts. The City, Council finds and declares that providing improvements. and promoting activities which benefit these confer benefits upon the districts for which the community and business districts- upon the business improvements and activities are provided. The real property to be included within the review and recommendations of the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission shall be the boundaries of the current Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District No. 1. These boundaries may be extended and expanded as recommended by the Commission 4 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRFT' and approved by the City Council. Sec. 2-142. Commission Duties; Responsibilities; Activi- ties. The duties, responsibilities •and activities of the Commission shall include the authority to set and establish parking policy on the public lots within the District known as Lots A, B, C and H, as wellasother parkinglots that may be created within the district, consistent with the terms and provisions of any existing and future leases for the operation of said parking lots. This authority shall include, but not be limited to, the setting of parking lot rates, hours of opera- tion, signage, maintenance, and preferential parking policy, including the use of and cost paid for validations by the businesses within the district, daily permit parking, monthly permit parking, and special event parking. The Commission shall also review and make recommendations to the City Council for any and all contracts, agreements, leases and renewal of leases for the operation of the parking lots within the district and for the study of. andacquisition- of additional parking places within the district. The Commis- sion shall further review, study and make recommendations to the City Council for the expenditure of revenues from the fund described in Section 2-143 herein for all activities, promo- tions and improvement projects which enhance business in general and the appearance of the district as a whole. With revenue received from these parking lots (and all revenues 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 R Fi°`71 accumulated heretofore from said lots), the Commission shall prepare a budget for and make recommendations to the City Council for the funding of improvements and activities to benefit and enhance the designated -business district. The types of improvements and activities that may be proposed to be funded by the Commission include, but are not limited to, the following: _. (a) acquisition of additional parking; (b) construction of parking structures; (c) landscaping, sidewalk and street improvements; (d) benches, trash receptacles, fountains, street lighting; promotional activities which enhance business and tourism within the district; retention of professional consultants to advise the Commission and City Council on any activity within the jurisdiction of the Commission; (g) Other improvements and activities which confer special benefits upon the businesses for which the improvements and activities are provided. Sec. 2-143. Funding of Improvements and Activities The above activities will be funded from the revenues heretofore accumulated by the Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District No. 1 and those revenues henceforth generated from the operation of Parking Lots A,- B, C and H, and any other revenues that may become available to the Commission. There will be no 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 R FT*Y assessments imposed upon businesses or property owners within the district to fund the activities of the Commission. All funds currently accumulated in the Hermosa Beach Vehicle Parking District No. 1 and all future revenues due the City from the operation of Parking Lots A, B, C and H shall be segregated and kept in a separate fund and not co -mingled with general funds or any other City funds. All funds accumulated for the benefit of the Commission shall be dedicated to the exclusive use of the activities of the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District and for no other purpose. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this day of 1993. Beach ATTEST: City Clerk President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2,3 24 25 26 27 28 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 8 DRAFT � '�l • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23. 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 93 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION AND TERMINATING THE VEHICLE PARKING DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF PARKING PLACE COMMISSIONERS. WHEREAS, the Vehicle Parking District was established in 1991 pursuant to the Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943 (California Streets and Highways Code, Section 31500 et seq.), and; WHEREAS, a separate Board of Parking Place Commissioners has been appointed by the City Council which oversees the activities of the Vehicle Parking District; and WHEREAS, there is a need to expand the activities that can be performed by such district including, but not limited to, promotion of public events which benefit businesses in the area, promotion of tourism within the area, and activities which benefit businesses located and operating in the area; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of the business district of the City of Hermosa Beach in order to create jobs, attract new business and prevent erosion of the business district; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to replace the. Vehicle Parking District with a Downtown Area Enhancement District Commission; and, 2b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 181 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27' 28 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to reconstitute the Board of Parking Place Commissioners as a separate commission to review and make recommendations to the City Council on the expenditure of revenues and activities of the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Article XV of Chapter two of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "ARTICLE XV. DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT COMMISSION Sec. 2-140. Created; Composition; Terms There is hereby created a Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission which shall initially consist of the five (5) current members of the Vehicle Parking District. Commission members shall serve for a period of four (4) years and no member shall remain on said commission for a period of time longer than two (2) consecutive terms. If a vacancy shall occur otherwise than by expiration of term, it shall be filled by appointment by the city council for the unexpired portion of the term. Upon the expiration of a full term, each member of the commission shall serve until a successor is appointed and qualified, except that in the event of a written resignation filed with the city manager and accepted by action of the city council, said resignation shall become effective on the date set forth therein. 13350 2 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Two (2) absences from regularly scheduled meetings of any member within one (1) calendar quarter, and/or four absences from regular meetings within one (1) calendar year creates an automatic vacancy. There shall be no distinction between excused or unexcused absences. When an automatic vacancy occurs, the staff liaison shall promptly notify the city council, the commission and the member. The automatic vacancy shall not be effective until council receives notice and fails to waive application of this section. The city council may waive application of the automatic vacancy upon its own motion; otherwise, the vacancy so created shall be filled pursuant to this section. Sec. 2-141. Declaration of Purpose. The city council finds and declares that it is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of the business districts in the city in order to create jobs, attract new businesses, and prevent erosion of the business districts. The city council finds and declares that providing improvements and promoting activities which benefit these business districts confer benefits upon the community and upon the business districts for which the improvements and activities are provided. The real property to be included within the review and recommendations of the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Commission shall be designated by Resolution to be recommended by the Commission and approved by the City Council. 13350 3 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 i 27 28 Sec. 2-142. Commission Duties; Responsibilities; Activities The duties, responsibilities and activities of the commission shall include the supervision of and the making of recommendations to the city council for the operation and control of certain parking lots within the downtown area and such other property as designated by the city council. With the revenue received by the city from these parking lots, the commission shall prepare a budget for and recommendations to the city council for the funding of certain improvements and activities to benefit the designated business districts. The type or types of improvements and activities that may be proposed to be funded by the Commission includes, but is not limited to, the following: (a) parking facilities (b) benches (c) trash receptacles (d) street lighting (e) decorations (f) parks (g) fountains (h) tourism and business promotion (i) Other improvements and activities which confer special benefits upon the businesses for which the improvements and activities are provided. Sec. 2-143. Funding of Improvements and Activities. The above improvements and activities will be funded from the revenues generated from the parking areas designated above and there will be no assessments imposed upon businesses within the District. 13350 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceed- ings of the city council at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1993. President of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CK,..,L k"., , City Attorney 13350 5. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Planni j or SUBJECT: Fantasy Arcade C.U.P -- Reconsideration and Referral to the Planning Commission DATE: June 2, 1993 Recommendation To extend the time period for the Planning Commission to report back to the City Council on the C.U.P. referral, and to continue the public hearing to July 13, 1993. Background The City Council referred the reconsideration of the C.U.P. back to the Planning Commission on May 11, 1993, for report and recommendation. At the meeting of June 1, 1993, the Planning Commission was scheduled to review and make a recommendation on the subject referral. However, because of the time needed to consider the oil drilling project at that meeting, they postponed review of the Fantasy Arcade C.U.P. to their July 6, 1993 meeting. This date does not fall within the 40 day time period established for referrals (Section 1413). As such, the Commission needs an extended time period. If the hearing is continued to July 13, 1993, the time period given to the Commission would be extended from 40 to 62 days. Frederick R. City Manager 84CHOROUND AMTER/41 Benjamin P. Wasserman Patrick 9f. Hough June 1, 1993 LAW OFFICE OF BENIAMIN P. WASSEV (AN 419 West Broadway Long Beach, California 90802 (310) 436.5875 RECEIVED Facsimile (310)436-25.53" JUN 1 1993 PLANNING DEPT. HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING COMMISION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL Hermosa Beach, CA. 90254 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CUP 92-35 (AMORTIZED) 544 Pacific Coast Highway - "Fantasy Arcade" Dear Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission: This office has been asked to write you by Richard Papillon regarding his application for the above entitled Conditional Use Permit. While Mr. Papillon is desirous of cooperating fully with the City of Hermosa Beach, its employees and departments, he is also aware that the Fantasy Arcade is an existing, on-going, and licensed business. Last year, when the present application for conditional use permit was taken out by Mr. Papillon, it was his intent to upgrade and reduce his adult businesses approximately fifty to sixty percent. He paid the necessary application fee, and spend the necessary funds for plans and related items He gained the support of the Acting Chief of the Police Department who approved the plans submitted at the April 6, 1993 commission meeting. As you are aware, your commission likewise approved the plan at the same meeting. An appeal was raised by several council members, the matter heard by the City Council on May 11, 1993, and returned to your commission for its meeting, June 1, 1993 with additional burdensome, costly, oppressive, and improper conditions, to which Mr. Papillon does not and will not agree. Specifically the conditions objected to are as follows: As to Alternative #1 Condition 8 of standard conditions, and conditions 17 and 25 under site specific conditions. Mr. Papillon does not and will not accept or agree to Alternative # 2. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION �Y C Mr. Papillion is well aware that his existing adult business is a "protective use" under the City of Hermosa Beach City Code, as well as the Constitutions of the State of California and the United States. He applied for the conditional use permit in good faith as stated above to reduce his adult business and upgrade and improve his property. He will only continue if the conditions objected to above and. alternative 2 are deleted. If they are not, Mr. Papillion will withdraw his application and continue to operate his existing adult business. Mr. Papillion is willing and desirous to cooperate with your commission and with the City Council but he will not agree to "selective enforcement" of his business by the city. Very truly yours, LA OFFICE OF BENJAMIN P. WASSERMAN t7i,, NJAMIN P. WASSERMAN PW:sg 06;27;93 17:08 V213 482 5336 OB&V 4111) WILLIAM B. BARR CHARLES S. `JOSE CONNIE COOKE SANDIFER JAMES DUFF MURPHY EDWARD W. LEE ROGER W. SPRINGER ALYN S. BERGMAN STEVEN O. OUINTANILLA MARY L. MCMASTER LAW OFFICES OLIVER, BARR & Vp$E A rwereemoNAL CONTOWAT,ON 1000 3VNSEY I OVLCVARO LOS ANOELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 12131 260-3043 MEMORANDUM 0002/066 TELECOPIER (2131 482-6335 • RECEIVED MAY 2 7 1993 TO: Michael Schubach, Director of Planning PLANNING DEPT. FROM: Edward Lee, Assistant City Attorney W� DATE: May 27, 1993 RE: Naonal City v, Weiner I have reviewed the following case of National City v. Weiner, 3 Cal.4th 832 (Oct. 1992) for its application to the City and the present application by Fantasy Arcade. Issue• Rule: Does a zoning ordinance restricting placement of adult businesses that combines distance regulations and an exception for locations in certain shopping malls conform to the requirements of the First Amendment? In City of Renton v. Playtime Theaters, Inc. (1986) 475 U.S. 41, the U.S. Supreme Court established a two-part test for content -neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on protected speech. The ordinance must (1) be designed to serve a substantial government interest, and (2) allow for reasonable alternative avenues of communication. Analysis: • National City attempted to regulate adult businesses by enacting an ordinance that prohibited their placement within 1500 feet of a school, public park, or other adult business, or within 1000 feet of a residential zone. Such distance restrictions did not apply if the business was located in a commercial zone and inside an enclosed shopping mall, or in an outside mall, but isolated from direct view from any public 1 -�- SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION, 1 1 ' 05/27/93 17:08 V2 3 ii,482 5336 OB&V OLIVER. BARR & VOSE Q3003/006 street, park, school, church, or residentially zoned property. The ordinance specifically did not restrict the number of adult businesses allowed in the City, the hours such business were allowed to operate, or the operation of pre-existing adult businesses. It only affects the placement of new adult businesses. An adult business (Chuck's Bookstore) located within thecity was forced to move by redevelopment. When it reopened at a new location, National City brought an action to abate the bookstore as a violation of the placement ordinance. Evidence showed that the purpose of the ordinance was to regulate the secondary deleterious effects of adult businesses, not the content of the materials sold, thus the court determined the ordinance to be content -neutral, and properly analyzed under the Renton standard. The Court found the first prong of the Renton test to be "easily satisfied", deciding that there is a substantial government interest in decreasing urban blight and decay, and such blight and decay may result from the location of adult businesses. The Court also found that the ordinance provides reasonable alternative avenues of communications. Respondents contended that only 4.5 of the 572 acres of commercially -zoned land were outside the restricted distances (and such land was already occupied), and the availability of shopping mall spaces were illusory, since no such mall would rent space to an adult business, thus making adult businesses commercially unfeasible. The Court disagreed, stating that "[t]he inquiry for First Amendment purposes is not concerned with economic impact," and, "We decline to hold local governments responsible for the business decisions of private individuals who act for their own economic concerns without any reference to the First Amendment. The Constitution does not saddle municipalities with the task of ensuring either the popularity or economic success of adult businesses." Conclusion: National City's ordinance satisfies the two -prong Renton test, and therefore does not violate the First Amendment. Application to Hermosa Beach's situation: This case does not apply. Hermosa Beach seeks to restrict the hours that Fantasy Arcade may operate, while the National City ordinance specifically did not restrict hours of adult business operation, only placement. As such, the Court did not • address the issue of restriction of operation, and so the case has limited applic�.bility. Perhaps more important, the facts behind National City's abatement action are quite different from what Hermosa Beach could do to abate Fantasy Arcade. National 2 S 05.27;93 17:09 482 5336 OB&V OLIVER, BARR & VQSE 15475 • 1 004/006 City did not bring its action against Chuck's Bookstore until Chuck's Bookstore was forced to move to a new location by redevelopment. Once Chuck's moved, it was no longer a pre-existing use. At a new location, Chuck's was subject to the restrictions of National City's ordinance since it was no longer a pre-existing use. Unless Fantasy Arcade changes location, National City does not apply to the situation with Fantasy Arcade. Regarding the contention that this case would allow a city to amortize out the Fantasy Arcade without providing a relocation area or causing taking problems, there may be some support in the case. The dissent argues that the adult business in National City could have been abated as a public nuisance. There are at least two problems with this contention. First, it is only in the dissent. The majority specifically declines to decide the public nuisance issue. Second, there were facts to support the contention that there may have been a public nuisance. Used condoms and pornographic material had been found in yards by children. A child had been chased by a customer of the bookstore. Sexual acts had been observed in the alley behind the bookstore. If an adult business was run in a clean and legal manner, with adequate security and supervision, then it would escape abatement. Any attempt to abate such an establishment could only be on content -based grounds, which clearly would violate the First Amendment. 3 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission (REFERRAL BACK FROM CITY COUNCIL ON APPEAL) SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: May 19, 1993 Regular Meeting of June 1, 1993 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CUP 92-35 (AMORTIZED) 544 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - "FANTASY ARCADE" RICHARD PAPILLON 900 ESPLANADE BLVD REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277 APPELLANTS: MAYOR WIEMANS AND COUNCILMEMBER EDGERTON PURPOSE: TO RECONSIDER THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO AUTHORIZE AN ADULT BUSINESS (BOOKSTORE AND THEATER/ARCADE) SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS Alternatives 1. Approval of the C.U.P., subject to the conditions as approved by the Planning Commission on 4/6/93 with an added condition to limit hours from 7:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. 2. Approve a substantially more restrictive C.U.P. with all applicable restrictions of the Adult Ordinance included (including no doors on individual booths, and limiting hours from 10:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M.) and additional requirements for improvements. Background At the meeting of April 6, 1993, the Planning Commission approved the C.U.P. subject to several conditions in regards to the operation of the business and to require improvements and changes to the interior layout. The Commission added. several conditions to those recommended by staff. At the meeting of May 11, 1993, the City Council, upon reconsideration of this matter, referred the request back to the •Commission for review and recommendation of several concerns that were not addressed by the Commission or Staff, and to consider imposing all applicable conditions of the adult business ordinance. For further background please refer to the attached minutes and reports. Analysis The City Council directed the Commission to further consider and address the following: '7 11 c - Separate non -adult and adult bookstores in same building (concern: that youths can come in regular book and magazine area in front --should there be separate entrances?) - Hours of operation --unusual for a theater - Prohibition of any doors on individual video viewing booths - Change of use to group theatre (does this change warrant upgrades for added bathroom, fire doors, bringing Ztarking up to code, other building and safety codes ?) - Security/Supervision (should a security guard be present at all times) - Why not impose all standard conditions of adult ordinance? These issues will be discussed separately below, and recommended conditions for alternative #2 resolution will be proposed. SEPARATE NON -ADULT AND ADULT BOOKSTORES The Council expressed concern that the proposed interior modification to have a standard bookstore in the front portion -- and the adult books, videos and viewing rooms in the back would create an additional problem rather than being an improvement. By having an area that youths could enter in the same building would potentially expose these youths to immoral and lewd activity, and worse, to potential harassment from customers of the adult business portion. Further, it would be tougher to control and restrict their access. To address this concern separate access could be required to each portion of the business. A condition to this affect is included in alternative #2 resolution. HOURS OF OPERATION Currently the business is open from 6:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. daily. The standard condition in the adult ordinance is to .restrict hours to 10:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. This issue has already been discussed extensively. There are obvious concerns about late hour operations and the impacts on .the nearby residential neighborhood in terms of noise and added congestion during quiet hours. If the Commission wishes to recommend imposing more restrictive hours, a strong finding must be made. In another case, staff recommended a possible finding as follows: Nuisances, violations, and the potential police response to violations are more disrupting to nearby residents during the otherwise quieter periods in the late night and early morning hours. The 10:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. restriction, and the above finding are included in the Alternative #2 resolution. DOORS ON INDIVIDUAL BOOTHS The business currently has 19 individual viewing booths with full length lockable doors. These booths have been the source of may of the problems associated with this business as lewd acts are either initiated or occur in these booths (as discovered by the "decoy" operations of the police). The standard condition of the adult ordinance prohibits the use of doors or any screening on individual viewing booths, and limits use of booths to one person at a time. The intent of this section is to allow the manager or employee on the premises, or a police officer, to easily and immediately see all customers in the business, and thus to restrict the use of the booths to one customer. In trying to work out a reasonable and workable compromise, and to satisfy the main concerns of the Police Department, the applicant proposes removing 15 of the 19 viewing booths, and replacing them with an open theater. While he still desired to have full length lockable doors for• customer privacy, staff proposed a condition that "half -doors" be installed on the remaining 4 booths, to satisfy the intent of the adult ordinance for an employee or officer to see how many people are inside. The Police Department did not feel it was reasonable or necessary to not allow any doors, and thus in the effort to make progress with the applicant to see a significant reduction in the number of booths and other improvements, did not press for the more restrictive condition. The open theater would have no doors, and since the patrons would be in full view of employee and/or an officer, the propensity for lewd or immoral acts is anticipated to be significantly reduced. The Commission may wish to impose the more strict requirement of no doors or screening, by including the standard condition of the adult ordinance. This is included in the Alternative #2 resolution. CHANGE OF USE TO "GROUP" THEATER This change is not seen as an intensification, as discussed previously, and for assurance, staff has included a condition to limit the number of patrons to 15. Instead, the Police Department sees this change as an improvement in the situation because 15 individual lockable booths would be removed. The group theater is much easier to police, and is less likely to encourage the type of behavior occurring in the more private individual booths. The Council, however, is that it is more intense. applicant to upgrade the safety requirements and requirements. concerned about this change, feeling As such, it might warrant requiring the building to comply with building and concerns and __to comply with parking Staff. would caution the Commission in imposing these types of conditions, as then the applicant would likely refuse to make c I C the changes open seating which the Police have been trying to get him to make. As noted previously the Police Department believes the open theater is a better situation. If the Commission desires to impose conditions regarding fire exits, for more parking, and that the building be brought up to building and safety code in all respects, a condition to this effect is included in Alternative #2 resolution. _. SECURITY The conditions as previously proposed by the Commission include a requirement for surveillance cameras. A possible additional measure would be to require a uniformed security guard on the premises at all times. This requirement is included in alternative #2 resolution. STANDARD CONDITIONS The ordinance includes standard conditions for approval of an adult business. The ordinance also specifically states that "appropriate and reasonable exceptions may be made by the Planning Commission and/or City Council for conditional use - permits imposed in the amortizing of existing adult businesses where not applicable" Potentially applicable standard conditions from the adult ordinance would include numbers 4 through 15, since the first three relate to locating a new adult business certain distances from residences, schools, and churches. The ones not previously included precisely as written in the ordinance are as follows, with explanations for the modifications: (6) The public interior areas shall be fully and brightly lighted and arranged so that every portion of the premises is visible upon entrance, but shall not be viewed from outside, and so that the entire body of any patron is also visible immediately upon entrance to the premises. In the previously approved, and alternative #1, resolution, the phrase, "the entire body" is removed because of the "half -door" requirement, and "immediately upon entrance to the premises" was modified to read "to anyone walking through the premises" in recognition of the floor plan. (condition #3) (7) The number of film or video viewing machines or booths shall not exceed one machine per thirty square feet of floor area. All adult businesses that include film or video viewing machines or booths shall be one off-street parking space for every such machine or booth. This condition was not included in the previously approved or alternative #1 resolution. In its __place (condition #14) is the following: "The number of film or video viewing machines or booths shall not exceed five machines with a maximum of four (4) individual viewing booths and one large video viewing room" This condition is in recognition of the modified interior floor plan, and the parking requirement was not included in recognition of the existing use and nonconforming parking situation (standard grandfather) since there is no proposed expansion or intensification of use. (If a viewing booth were allowed per 30 square feet of floor area it would be 53 booths ' This condition is included in alternative #2 resolution, which essentially would require the applicant to make some major site improvements and/or demolitions to provide enough parking. (8) There shall be no doors or other similar closable screens on video or film viewing booths. This condition was not included previously and instead conditions requiring half -doors on the individual booths, and no doors on the video viewing room (condition #15) as discussed above is included in the alternative #1 resolution. Further, as part of the condition the walls between booths are required to be permanent and without holes or gaps. This standard condition is included in the alternative #2 resolution. (10)No adult business, except large screen motion picture theaters/arcades which shall be closed at midnight, shall operate or be open to the public between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 10:00 A.M. of the following day. This condition was not included, as discussed and explained above, and previously. In alternative #1 resolution, an hours limitation of 6:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M is proposed. A condition to be consistent with this standard. requirement is .included in alternative #2 resolution. The remaining standard conditions were included as written in the ordinance. Further, several additional site specific conditions in addition to the standard conditions are included in the previously approved resolution: limit viewing booths to one person - limit the viewing room to 15 people eliminateall pornographic reference on exterior signs - require and maintain 4 surveillance cameras require the side exit door to remain free and clear for fire exiting - require management and supervision to prevent lewd acts, and any loitering, boisterous or illegal activity - require a trash enclosure - require revised and accurate plans - require repainting of the buildings on site - allow the police to require security if necessary require one year review .t .4 modified. determine if hours should be In sum, while the approach staff previously took was not "hard-line" it was a serious attempt to successfully regulate this business in accordance with the intent of the adult ordinance, with some selective exceptions to make it workable, practical, and acceptable in consideration of the fact that we are dealing with an existing business concern. . • If the Commission, based on the direction of Council, and if it feels comfortable that the threat to public, health, safety and welfare warrants these conditions, it should consider the more restrictive alternative #2 resolution. - CONCUR: Michael`Schubach Planning Director Attachments: NOT AVAILABLE Ken Robertson Associate Planner 1. Alternative #1 Resolution 2. Alternative #2 Resolution 3. Previous staff reports, minutes and attachments p/pcsr544 Alternative #1 RESOLUTION P.C. 93- 23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING ADULT BUSINESS, UPON RECONSIDERATION, (ADULT BOOKSTORE AND ADULT THEATER/ARCADE) AT 544 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 15 CAMINO REAL TRACT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 1, 1993, to consider a referral of the City Council on a reconsideration of a previous Planning Commission approval and to receive oral and written testimony regarding the matter and made the following findings: A. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for an existing adult business, including an adult bookstore and adult theater/arcade; B. The inherent nature of adult businesses are recognized as having potentially objectionable and deleterious operational characteristics; C. The regulation of adult business operations and locationsis in the interest of the general public health, safety, and welfare; D. The subject adult business has a past history of being conducted in an immoral and disorderly manner and the owner has failed to exercise reasonable efforts to maintain order among the customers and to prevent violations of the Civil Code for lewd and lascivious acts; E. The conditions and required interior modifications as set forth below, are necessary to prevent illegal and immoral acts from continuing to occur on the premises and in the vicinity, and will serve to mitigate the potential threat to the public safety and welfare to the maximum possible; NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow the adult business at 544 Pacific Coast Highway subject to the following: SECTION I (CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL) Standard Conditions 1. Clearly visible signs shall be posted at all entrances to the adult areas stating "Adults Only - No Minors Permitted" or equivalent wording. 2. All building openings, entries, and windows shall be designed or screened so that the contents may not be seen from the public sidewalk or equivalent public areas accessible to minor 3. The public interior areas shall be fully and brightly lighted and arranged so that every portion of the premises is visible upon entrance, but shall not be viewed from outside, and so that any patron, is also easily visible to anyone walking through the premises. 4. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold or consumed on the premises and appropriate notification of this restriction shall be displayed on the premises. 5. Advertisements, displays, or other promotional materials shall not be shown or exhibited so as to be visible to the public from exterior areas, and such displays shall be considered signs. 6. No loudspeakers or sound equipment shall be used on the premises that can be discerned from exterior areas. 7. Outdoor signs or similar displays showing nude bodies, topless or bottomless female bodies, or bottomless male bodies shall be prohibited. 8. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents and/or nearby commercial establishments. 9. No home delivery of any materials that are distinguished or characterized by the depiction or description of specified anatomical areas or specified sexual activities. 10. The exterior and interior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. 11. All signs must comply with the City Sign Ordinance. Proper sign permits shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety. 12. A manager or employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. (a) The conditional use permit conditions shall be placed on the property in a location where employees can easily read the conditions.. Site Specific Conditions 13. The final floor layout shall be substantially consistent with submitted plans identified as the "proposed layout of the business", revised in accordance with the conditions below, and improvements shall be implemented within sixty (60) days from the date of approval of this resolution. Any minor modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Planning Director. 14. The number of film or video viewing machines or booths shall not exceed five machines with a maximum of four (4) individual viewing booths, and one large video viewing room. 15. There shall be only one individual per viewing booth at a time with appropriate signage indicating this condition. 16. There shall be a maximum of 15 people allowed in the large viewing room and appropriate signage indicating this condition. 17. Doors or other similar closable screens on individual video or film viewing booths shall at most be half doors, without locks, with the bottom half open, to make any patron visible to the employee on the premises, while no door shall be permitted at the entrance to video viewing room. Adjacent viewing booths must be separated by permanent walls with no holes or gaps to allow human contact or viewing into the adjacent video booth. 18. All exterior signage shall not indicate XXX or pornographic references. 19. The four (4) surveillance cameras shall be maintained and in operational order. 20. The side exit door shall be maintained free and clear to ensure fire and safety standards. 21. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent lewd and lascivious acts, and any other loitering, .loud, boisterous, or illegal activity of patrons inside the business or in the immediate area. c 22. A trash enclosure shall beprovided" with a minimum 5 -foot high masonry enclosure and view obscuring gate in accordance with Building Department requirements. (permits shall be obtained from the Building Department prior to construction) 23. A revised floor plan and site plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Director within 30 days from the date of approval of this resolution indicating the following: (a) Fixed seating in the large video viewing room with a maximum of fifteen (15) . (b) _location and size of proposed trash enclosure (c) typical site dimensions and floor area dimensions 24. The exterior of the buildings on site shall be repaired and repainted. 25. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may require at all times the presence of a police approved doorman and / or security personnel paid by the business. -_ 26. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 6:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M. daily. 27. The number of complaints shall be reviewed after one (1) year to determine if the hours of operation should be modified or the revocation process should be initiated. SECTION II This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owner of the property involved have filed at the office of the Department of Planning their affidavit stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept,. all of the. conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Los Angeles County, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if any of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend,' indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained andoperated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. SECTION III Any violation of the conditions of approval and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be grounds for a public hearing for the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing P.C. Resolution 93-23 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of June 1, 1993. Joseph DiMonda, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary Date p/pers536 ONO Alternative #2 RESOLUTION P.C. 93-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING ADULT BUSINESS, UPON RECONSIDERATION, (ADULT BOOKSTORE AND ADULT THEATER/ARCADE) AT 544 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 15 CAMINO REAL TRACT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 1, 1993, to consider a referral of the City Council on a reconsideration of a previous Planning Commission approval and to receive oral and written testimony regarding the matter and made the following findings: A. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for an existing adult business, including an adult bookstore and adult theater/arcade; B. The inherent nature of adult businesses are recognized as having potentially objectionable and deleterious operational characteristics; C. The regulation of adult business operations and locations is in the interest of the general public health, safety, and welfare; D. The subject adult business has a past history of being. conducted in an immoral and disorderly manner and the owner has failed to exercise reasonable efforts to maintain order among the customers and to prevent violations of the Civil Code for lewd and lascivious acts; E. Nuisances, violations, and the potential police response to violations caused by this type of business are more disrupting to nearby residents during the otherwise quieter periods in the late night and early morning hours. F. The conditions and required interior modifications as set forth below, are necessary to prevent illegal and immoral —(8 acts from continuing to occur on the premises and in the vicinity, and will serve to mitigate potential threats to the public safety and welfare; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow the adult business at 544 Pacific Coast Highway subject to the following: SECTION I (CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL) Standard Operating Conditions 1. Clearly visible signs shall be posted at all entrances to the adult areas stating "Adults Only - No Minors Permitted" or equivalent wording. 2. All building openings, entries, and windows shall be designed or screened so that the contents may not be seen from the public sidewalk or equivalent public areas accessible to minors. -- __- 3. The public interior areas shall be fully and brightly lighted and arranged so that every portion of the premises is visible upon entrance, but shall not be viewed from outside, and so that any patron is also easily visible to anyone walking through the premises. 4. The number of film or video viewing machines or booths shall not exceed one machine per thirty square feet of floor area. There shall be one off-street parking space for every such machine or booth. 5. There shall be no door or other similar closable screens on video or film viewing booths. 6. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold or consumed on the premises and appropriate notification of this restriction shall be displayed on the premises. 7. The business shall not operate or be open to the public between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 10:00 A.M. 8. Advertisements, displays, or other promotional materials shall not be shown or exhibited so as to be visible to the public from exterior areas, and such displays shall be considered signs. 9. No loudspeakers or sound equipment shall be used on the premises that can be discerned from exterior areas. 10. Outdoor signs or similar displays showing nude bodies, topless or bottomless female bodies, or bottomless male bodies shall be prohibited. 11. The establishment shall not adversely affect the -welfare of residents and/or nearby commercial establishments. _19 12. No home delivery of any materials that are distinguished or•' characterized by the depiction or description of specified anatomical areasor specified sexual activities. 13. The exterior and interior of the premises shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. 14. All signs must comply with the City Sign Ordinance. Proper sign permits shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety. 15. A manager or employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. (a) The conditional use permit conditions shall be placed on the property in a location where employees can easily read the conditions. Site Specific Conditions 16. The final floor layout shall be substantially consistent with submitted plans identified as the "proposed layout of the business", revised in accordance with the conditions below, and shall be implemented within sixty (60) days from the date of approval of this resolution. Any minor modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Planning Director. 17. A minimum of 4 off-street parking spaces exclusively for customers of the business shall be provided in accordance with the dimensional standards of the zoning ordinance, and said spaces shall be on a paved surface. 18. The number of film or video viewing machines or booths shall not exceed five machines with a maximum of four (4) individual viewing booths, and one large video viewing room. 19. There shall be only one individual per viewing booth at a time with appropriate signage indicating this _condition. 20. There shall be a maximum of 15 people allowed in the large viewing room and appropriate signage indicating this condition. Adjacent viewing booths must be separated by permanent walls with no holes or gaps to allow human contact or viewing into the adjacent video booth. 21. All exterior signage shall not indicate XXX or pornographic references. 22. The four (4) surveillance cameras shall be maintained and in operational order. In addition, a uniformed security guard shall be on the premises during all operating hours open to the public. 23. The side exit door shall be maintained free and clear to ensure fire and safety standards. 24. The business shall .provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent lewd and lascivious acts, and any other loitering,loud, boisterous, or illegal activity of patrons inside the business or in the immediate area. 25. A trash enclosure shall be provided with a minimum 5 -foot high masonry enclosure and view obscuring gate in accordance with Building Department requirements. (permits shall be obtained from the Building Department prior to construction) 26. A revised floor plan and site plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Director within 30 days from the date of approval of this resolution indicating the following: (a) Fixed seating in the large video viewing room with a maximum of fifteen (15) . (b) location and size of proposed trash enclosure (c) typical site dimensions and floor area dimensions (d) The provision of parking to comply with the parking requirements of this conditional use permit (e) Separate entrances into the adult and non -adult business areas 27. The subject building where the business is operated shall be brought into conformance with all building and safety and fire codes, and an additional bathroom shall be provided 28. The exterior of the buildings on site shall be repaired and repainted. 29. The police chief may determine that a continuing police problem exists and may require at all times the presence of a police approved doorman and / or security personnel paid by the business. 30. The hours of operation shall be limited to between 6:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M. daily. 31. The number of complaints shall be reviewed after one (1) year to determine if the hours of operation should be modified or the revocation process should be initiated. SECTION II This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owner of the property involved have filed at the office of the Department of Planning their affidavit stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The. Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Los Angeles County, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if any - of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of -this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participateat its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions"of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violation of these conditions. SECTION III Any violation of the conditions of approval and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be grounds for a public hearing for the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission may review this Conditional Use Permit and may amend the subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing P.C. Resolution 93-23 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of June 1, 1993. Joseph DiMonda, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary Date p/pers536 — Z -Z — 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c RESOLUTION P.C. 93-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EXISTING ADULT BUSINESS (ADULT BOOKSTORE AND ADULT THEATER/ARCADE) AT 544 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 15 CAMINO REAL TRACT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission. held a public hearing on April 6, 1993, to receive oral and written testimony regarding a Conditional Use Permit at 544 Pacific Coast Highway and made the following findings: A. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for an existing adult business, including an adult bookstore and adult theater/arcade; B. The inherent nature of adult businesses are recognized as having potentially objectionable and deleteriousoperational characteristics; C. The regulation of adult business operations and locations is in the interest of the general public health, safety, and welfare; D. The subject adult business has a past history of being conducted in an immoral and disorderly manner and the owner has failed to exercise reasonable efforts to. maintain order •among the customers and to prevent violations of the Civil Code for lewd and lascivious acts; E. The conditions and required interior modifications as set forth below, are necessary to prevent illegal and immoral acts from continuing to occur on the premises and in the vicinity, and will serve to mitigate the potential threat to the public safety and welfare to the maximum possible; NOW, THEREFORE, BE. IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California,. does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow the adult business at 544 Pacific Coast Highway subject to the following:• 4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION I `(CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL) Standard Operating Conditions 1. Clearly visible signs shall be posted at all entrances to the adult areas stating "Adults Only - No Minors Permitted" or equivalent wording. 2. All building openings, entries, and windows shall be designed or screened so that the contents. may not _be seen from the public sidewalk or equivalent public areas accessible to minors. 3. The public interior areas shall be fully and brightly lighted and arranged so that every portion of the premises is visible upon entrance, and so that any patron, even the in the viewing area is also easily visible to anyone walking through the premises. 4. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold or consumed on the premises and appropriate notification of this restriction shall be displayed on the premises. 5. Advertisements, displays, or other promotional materials shall not be shown or exhibited so as to be visible to -the public from exterior areas, and such displays shall be considered signs. 6. No loudspeakers or sound equipment shall be used on the premises that can be discerned from exterior areas. - 7. Outdoor signs or similar displays showing nude bodies, topless or bottomless female bodies, or bottomless male bodies shall be prohibited. 8. The establishment shall not adversely affect the welfare of residents and/or nearby commercial establishments. 9. No home delivery of any materials that are distinguished or characterized by the depiction or description_ of specified anatomical areas or specified sexual activities. 10. The exterior and interior of the premises shallbemaintained in a neat and clean manner at all times. 11. All signs must comply with the City Sign Ordinance. Proper sign permits shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety. 12. A manager or employee who is aware of the conditions of this conditional use permit shall be on the premises during business hours. (a) The conditional use permit conditions shall be placed on the property in a location where employees can easily read the conditions. Site Specific Conditions 13. The final floor layout shall besubstantially consistent with submitted plans identified as the "proposed layout of the -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 =- ' _ b. usiness_._.,_revised_ in._accordance with the conditions below, and shall- be implemented within sixty (60) days from the date ' of approval.. of this -resolution. Any minor modifications to the plan shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Planning Director. - 14. The number of film or video viewing machines or booths shall not exceed five machines with a maximum of four (4) individual viewing booths, and one large video viewing room. 15. There shall be only one individual per viewirfg-.booth at a time with appropriate signage indicating this condition. 16. There shall be a maximum of 15 people allowed in the large viewing room and appropriate signage indicating this condition. 17. Doors or other similar closable screens on individual video or film viewing booths shall at most be half doors, without locks, with the bottom half open, to make any patron visible to the employee on the premises, while no door shall be permitted at the entrance to video viewing room. Adjacent viewing booths must be separated by permanent walls with no holes or gaps to allow human contact or viewing intothe adjacent video booth. 18. All exterior signage shall not indicate XXX or pornographic references. 19. The four (4) surveillance cameras shall be maintained and in operational order. 20. The side exit door shall be maintained free and clear to ensure fire and safety standards. 21. The business shall provide adequate management and supervisory techniques to prevent lewd and lascivious acts, and any other loitering, loud, boisterous, or illegal activity of patrons inside the business or in the immediate area. 22. A trash enclosure shall be provided with a minimum 5 -foot high. masonry enclosure and view obscuring gate in accordance with Building Department requirements. (permits shall be obtained from the Building Department prior to construction) 23. A revised floor plan and site plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Director within 30 days from the date of approval of this resolution indicating the following: (a) Fixed seating in the large video viewing room with a maximum of fifteen (15). (b) location and size of proposed trash enclosure (c) typical site dimensions andfloor area dimensions 24. The exterior of the buildings on site shall be repaired and repainted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 • 19 20 21 22 23 • 24 25 26 27 28 25. The police chief- may determine hat a continuingP olice problem exists and may require at all times the presence of a --police approved doorman and / or security personnel paid by the business. 26. The number of complaints shall be reviewed after one (1) year to determine if the hours of operation should be modified or the revocation process should be initiated. SECTION II This grant shall not be effective for any purposes until the permittee and the owner of the property involved have filed at the office of the Department of Planning their affidavit stating that -they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Los Angeles County, and proof of recordation shall be submitted to the Planning Department. Each of the above conditions is separately enforced, and if any of the conditions of approval is found to be invalid by a court of law, all the other conditions shall remain valid' --and enforceable. Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval, which action is brought within the applicable time period of Government Code Section 65907. The_City shall promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any, claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. The subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or other regulation applicable to any development or activity on the subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any development or activity not in full compliance shall be a violationof these conditions. SECTION III Any violation of the conditions of approval and/or violation of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be ground •for a public hearing for the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Planning Commission may review t is Conditional Use Permit and may amend-the.subject conditions or impose any new conditions if deemed necessary to mitigate detrimental effects on the neighborhood resulting from the subject use. VOTE: AYES: Comms. Marks, Merl, Oakes,Suard,Chmn.Di Monda NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION_ I hereby certify the foregoing P.C. Resolution 93-23 a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of Ari 6, 1 3. - ! 4 /4;27Z oseph DiM'onda, Chairman Michael Schubach, Secretary p/pers536 -C73 3 Date PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. • REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECI- SION TO APPROVE AN AMORTIZED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FANTASY ARCADE AT 544 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. Memorandum • -from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 4, 1993. -Z8— City Council Minutes 05-11-93 Page 8151 Planning Director Schubach and City Attorney Vose re- sponded to Council questions. Action: To continue the public hearing for 30 days (to the meeting of June 8, 1993) and send the item back to the Planning Commission to review inconsistencies and for clarification of the following issues, with the understanding that other issues may be added to the mo- tion before moving on to the next item: 1) clarification of the proposed change of use and/or mixed use; 2) hours of operation; and, 3) doors on viewing booths. Motion Midstokke, second Mayor Wiemans. The motion car- ried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. (There were further items added to this motion at the conclusion of the public testimony.) The public hearing opened at 8:20 P.M. for anyone who would not be able to speak at the June 8, 1993 meeting. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Wilma Burt - 1152 Seventh Street, said the State Supreme Court had said that small cities do not__ have to provide space for businesses that cater to adult uses; and expressed concern regarding the proposed dual usage, said if allowed there should be two doors; and, Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, said that park- ing had been overlooked; there was little park- ing on Pacific Coast Highway causing patrons to park in, and frequently disturb, residential neighborhoods. Richard Papillon - owner of the "Fantasy Arcade", came forward but did not speak, as he was told the public hearing was being continued. The public testimony closed at 8:27 P.M. and the public hearing was continued to the meeting of June 8, 1993. • Further Action: That the Planning Commission's recon- sideration also include: 4) parking requirement considerations; 5) clarification of the mini -movie adult theatre; 6) number of toilets; and, 7) amount of seating and fire doors. Mayor Wiemans, with the consensus of the Council, so ordered that the above items be included with the main motion. 6. TEXT AMEND - ` CTION 116 0 (d) REG VEWAY GRADES WITH ORDINANCE ACTION. Memorandum from Planning Direc 1993. c ael Schubach---ciat-8 a City Council Rinutes 05-11-93 Page 8152 je June 1, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 8, 1993 PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENT TO "SMOKING POLLUTION CONTROL" ORDINANCE Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council introduce, for adoption, the attached ordinance, Amendment to "Smoking Pollution Control" Ordinance. Background: At the May 11, 1993 meeting City Council directed staff to prepare an amendment to the existing smoking control ordinance and notice for public hearing for full discussion on the proposed changes. This hearing was duly noticed in the May 27, 1993 edition of the EasyReader. As stated in staff's May 11, 1993 report to council, in early 1993, the Environmental Protection Agency released a report that fingered second-hand smoke as a leading cause of cancer among non-smokers. To cut their exposure to workers' compensation claims, many in the business community have made proposals to impose work -place smoking bans. Recently, Governor Pete Wilson issued an executive order banning smoking in all state buildings. Analysis: The City's current ordinance was enacted in 1986 and has not been amended since that time. The current ordinance prohibits smoking in the following public places: Elevators, Restrooms, Civic Theatre, Community Center Gym, Council Chambers and all public counters and reception areas in City Hall, Police Department and Fire Station. The Clark Stadium Building and the Community Center Rental Rooms are also included, unless used for a private function. It has been interpreted that smoking is allowed in individual offices of City Hall and the Police Department (the Fire Department is a no smoking facility pursuant to their Memorandum of Understanding). It has also been interpreted that if the area does not have a public counter, that smoking is allowed out in the open desk areas, even though the public may have to come in direct contact with the second-hand smoke. Also, smoking is allowed at private functions at the Clark Stadium Building and Community Center rooms. The current Ordinance allows numerous areas in City Hall and the Police Department where non-smoking employees and/or the public are exposed to second-hand smoke on a continuous basis. w With the recent EPA report on the health dangers of second-hand smoke, it is time to re-evaluate the Smoking Pollution control more in terms of a smoking ban in the interests of the health of all employees and citizens. The proposed revised Ordinance addresses: 1) A complete smoking ban in City Hall, Police Department, Fire Department, Community Center (including rental rooms), City Yard Building and the Alano Club. (Basically all City -owned buildings). 2) A ban on smoking in all City -owned vehicles. In the recent past, employees working at Base III and the Police Department have requested that smoking be banned in those facilities. Following Council's May 11, 1993 direction to prepare for this public hearing, each of the City's recognized bargaining groups was notified of this potential action. The Teamster Union and Police Association have indicated that their members have no objection to the proposed ordinance. In the past two years, 92 California Cities have either enacted or strengthened their tobacco control Ordinances. The proposed Ordinance only addresses City -owned property and no privately owned property or businesses. Staff has contacted the California Psychological Health Plan and the American Lung Association regarding available resources which can be provided to interested employees to assist them should they choose to stop smoking. The proposed revised ordinance being presented prohibits smoking in all City -owned buildings/enclosed facilities and in all City -owned vehicles. It should be noted that the Ordinance includes the Alano Club building which is leased on a continuous basis. The City has received forty-eight (48) signed petitions requesting that the City include this facility in the Ordinance (petitions are on file in the Personnel Office). Respectfully s}rbmitted, Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Attachments: Proposed Ordinance Current Ordinance pers/smoke Concur: I re ed rick R. Ferrin City Manager No. 93 - No. 86-852 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 93 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 86-852, SMOKING POLLUTION CONTROL, AND CHAPTER 14 1/2 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, in early 1993, the Environmental Protection Agency released a report indicating that second-hand smoke is a leading cause of cancer among non-smokers, and WHEREAS, the City desires to provide a smoke-free work environment for all City employees and a smoke-free environment for all members of the public utilizing any city -owned buildings; and WHEREAS, smoking results in serious and significant physical discomfort of non-smokers and constitutes a public nuisance in public places and work places, and WHEREAS, the City desires to decrease its exposure to workers' compensation claims as a result of claims regarding second-hand smoke exposure to employees: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 14 1/2-5. Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places. Shall be amended to read as follows: "Smoking shall be prohibited in all City -owned buildings and property described below: 1. All City -owned buildings including City Hall, Police Headquarters, Fire Station, Community Center, City Yard, Clark Stadium Building, the old South School Park Building, the old Prospect School Building, Base III, the Alano Club building and any other such buildings/enclosed facilities as the City may acquire. 2. All City -owned vehicles." SECTION 2. CEQA. The passage of this Ordinance is not a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 project nor will it have a significant impact on the environment. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause, sentence or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, clauses, sentences or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 30th day following the date of its adoption. SECTION 5. PUBLICATION. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage hereof and prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption, shall cause this ordinance to. be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1993. PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jaw CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 ORDINANCE NO. 86- 852 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING ARTICLE II, "SMOKING POLLUTION CONTROL", TO CHAPTER 14-1/2 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, numerous studies have found that tobacco smoke is a major contributor to indoor air pollution; and WHEREAS, reliable studies have shown that breathing 7 second-hand smoke is a significant health hazard for several 8 population groups, including elderly people, individuals with 9 cardiovascular disease, and individuals with impaired respiratory 10 function, including asthmatics and those with obstructive airway 11 disease; and 12 WHEREAS, health hazards induced by breathing second-hand 13 smoke include lung cancer, respiratory infection, decreased exer- 14 cise tolerance, decreased respiratory function, bronchoconstric- 15 tion, and bronchospasm; and 16 WHEREAS, nonsmokers who suffer allergies, respiratory 17 diseases and other ill-effects of breathing secondhand smoke may 18 experience a loss of ability to enjoy public facilities or other - 19 wise utilize public facilities because of such adverse reactions; 20 and 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, numerous studies have shown that a majority of both nonsmokers and smokers desire to have restrictions on smok- ing in public places and places of employment; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. There is hereby added to Chapter 14-1/2, "Health" of the municipal code an Article II, to be entitled "Smoking Pollution Control" as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Section 14-1/2-4. Definitions. The following words and phrases, whenever used in this article, shall be construed as defined in this section: 1. "Smoking" means inhaling, exhaling, burning or carrying any lighted cigar, cigarette, weed, plant or other combustible substance in any manner or in any form. Section 14-1/2-5. Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places. Smoking shall be prohibited in all enclosed public 8 places described below: 9 1. Elevators 10 2. Restrooms 11 3. Civic Theatre 12 4. Community Center Gymnasium 13 5. City Council Chambers 14 6. All public counters and reception areas in City Hall, 15 Police Headquarters and the Fire Station. 16 Smoking shall be prohibited in all enclosed public 17 places described below, except when used for a private function: 18 7. Clark Building 19 8. Rental rooms at the Community Center. 20 Section 14-1/2-6. Posting of Signs 21 "Smoking" or "No Smoking" signs, whichever are appropri- 22 ate, with letters of not less than one inch (1") in height or the 23 international "No Smoking" symbol (consisting of a pictorial rep - 24 resentation of a burning cigarette enclosed in a red circle with 25 a red bar across it) shall be clearly, sufficiently and con - 26 spicuously posted in every building or other place where smoking 27 is regulated by this article, by the owner, operator, manager or 28 other person having control of such building or other place. 1 2 3 4 5 6 i 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Section 14-1/2-7. Enforcement' A. Enforcement of this article shall be implemented by the Director of Public Safety. B. Any citizen who desires to register a complaint under this chapter may initiate enforcement with the Director of Public Safety. Section 14-1/2-8. Violations and Penalties A. It shall be unlawful for any person to smoke in any area where smoking is prohibited by the provisions of this article. B. Any person who violates any provision of this article shall be guilty of an infraction, punishable by: 1. A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation. 2. A fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation of this article within one (1) year. 3. A fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for each additional violation of this article within one 18 (1) year. 19 Section 14-1/2-9. Other Applicable Laws 20 This article shall not be interpreted or construed to 21 permit smoking where it is otherwise restricted by other ap- 22 plicable laws. 23 Section 14-1/2-10. Severability 24 If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this 25 article or the application thereof to any person or circumstances 26 shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other 27 provisionsof this article which can be given effect without the 28 invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions • 3 1 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 of this article are declared to be severable. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. SECTION 3. That prior to the expiration of fifteen days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weeklf newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Hermosa Beach. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of September, 1986. PRESIDENT of the 9ity Council, and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: ii1PROVED AS TO Y CLERK TY ATTORNEY Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa City Council June 2, 1993 Regular Meeting of June 8,. 1993 SUBJECT: HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 93-2, RECONSIDERATION LOCATION: 20 4TH STREET APPLICANT: ALFRED W. SALIDO 2212 RONDA VISTA DRIVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90254 APPELLANTS: COUNCILMEMBERS EDGERTON AND BENZ PURPOSE: TO RECONSIDER THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO GRANT A HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING TO EXCEED 30 FEET IN THE R-3 ZONE Planning Commission Recommendation To sustain the decision to approve the height exception. Staff Recommendation To overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, as the project does not satisfy the conditions for granting an exception as set forth in Section 601. ALTERNATIVE: Refer the requested exception back to the Planning Commission to carefully reconsider the facts of the case, and its consistency with the language of Section 601. Background At their meeting of May 4, 1993, the Planning Commission approved the requested height exception noting the small lot was difficult to work with, and that except for the elevator tower the extension above 30 feet to 31 was minimal and would only consist of a decorative open railing around the roof deck. For further background please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report. Analysis The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing building to construct a new 3 -story dwelling. The proposed height would be about 31 feet, with a 34.5 foot tower above the elevator. To grant this height exception, the project must meet the conditions of Section 601 (copy attached). The following is a summary of the main points already presented in the Planning Commission staff report: - Only 10 of 56 lots in the vicinity are shown to have structures that exceed thirty feet - Only 1 of 21 lots on the block bounded by 4th Street, Third Street, The Strand and Hermosa Avenue have structures in excess of 30 feet. - The only building on the same block over 30 feet, located two lots to the east, exceeds 30 feet only on the back half of the building, while the front half is at 25 feet. - No Strand fronting buildings directly to its west are over two stories. Based on these observations, and on a visual inspection of the surroundings, staff does not believe the proposed project complies with conditions (1) and (2) contained in Section 601: - In regards to condition (1), the extension clearly is not necessary to take advantage of scenic views over surrounding structures. - In regards to condition (2), there is clearly not a substantial number of existing buildings in the vicinity of the project already constructed over thirty (30) feet. In sum, although the encroachment above 30 feet is rather small, the project clearly does not satisfy the conditions of Section 601, as adopted. The project could easily be modified to comply with a 30 foot height limit, and still retain all the scenic ocean views being sought. For further analysis please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report. CONCUR: icha 1 Schubach Planing Directo Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager Attachments Ken Robertson Associate Planner. 1. Proposed Resolution to overturn the Commission's decision 2. P.C. staff report with attachments 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION' 9 3- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO DENY A REQUEST UPON RECONSIDERATION TO ALLOW HEIGHT EXCEPTION AT 20 4TH STREET DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHERLY 1/2 OF LOT 8 AND NORTHERLY 47.5' OF THE WESTERLY 5' OF LOT 9 BLOCK 4, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on June 8 1993, to reconsider the Planning Commission decision to approve a height exception and to receive oral and written testimony on the matter and made the following findings: A. The Planning Commission did not make adequate findings or give sufficient reasons to justify granting of the height exception in accordance with Section 601 of the zoning ordinance; B. The request does not satisfy conditions (1) and (2) for granting a height exception, as set forth in Section 601 of the zoning ordinance, because (1) the extension above thirty (30) feet is not necessary for the project to obtain a scenic view, and (2) there is not a substantial number of existing buildings in the vicinity of the proposed project already constructed to a height greater than 30 feet; C. With respect to condition number (1) the extension above 30 feet is not necessary to obtain a scenic ocean view because the building to the west along the Strand are two story structures; a scenic view already exists form the ground level up, since a view corridor is available along the walk street; and the proposed structure could be constructed within the 30 -foot height limit while all views being sought would still be available; D. With respect to condition number (2), only 1 of 21 lots on the same block currently have structures above 30 feet in height, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 • 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and no buildings immediately adjacent to the subject lot are over 30 feet in height; E. Approval of the requested height exception is not consistent with the intent and purpose of Section 601 of the zoning ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby overturn the decision of Planning Commission to approve the requested height exception, and thereby denies said project. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1993, by: , PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROV D AS TO FORM: p/ccrs20 CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 93-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST, PURSUANT TO SECTION 601, TOALLOW HEIGHT EXCEPTION AT 20 4TH STREET DESCRIBED AS THE NORTHERLY 1/2 OF LOT 8 AND NORTHERLY 47.5' OF THE WESTERLY 5' OF LOT 9 BLOCK 4, HERMOSA BEACH TRACT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission. held a public hearing on May 4, 1993, to receive oral and written testimony regarding a request for a height exception and made the following findings: A. The Planning Commission is satisfied that the conditions for granting a height exception, and the intent, as set forth in Section 601 of the zoning ordinance are met by this request. B. The encroachment above 30 feet is minimal, and using decorative open railing around the roof deck, as required by the conditions below, will further minimize its impact. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby approve the requested height exception subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with submitted plans; any minor modifications shall be submitted for review, and may be approved, by the Planning Director. Significant modifications will require review and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The encroachment above 30 feet in height, except for the elevator tower, shall be constructed of decorative open railing to match the railing used elsewhere on -the building. VOTE: AYES: Comms.Merl,Oakes,Chmn.Di Monda NOES: Comms. Marks,Suard ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution P.C. 93-24 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Planning Commission of the C y of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of Mail• • . -moi /// / .J/ 1 J:seph Di Monda, Chairman --1> Date S Michael Schubach, Secretary" p/pers20 TION by Comm. Suard, seconded by Comm. Oakes, to CONTIN HL '3-3 to the Planning Commission's May 18, 1993 meeti - to allow he applicant to mitigate the problem of excess eight by lowe g the existing stairwell and trading of • ight to the propos new portion of the building. AYES: Co s. Marks, Merl, Oakes, Suar•, Chmn. Di Monda NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None • VAR 93-1 -- VARIANCE TO e4 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES TO ENCROACH INTO THE SIDE YARD ETBA AND A GARAGE EXPANSION TO ENCROACH INTO REQUIRED OPEN SPA AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIV DECLARATION AT •75 LONGFELLOW AVENUE continued from A 20 1993 meetin Due to the la -ness of the hour, the applica agreed to continuance The CO NSUS of the Commission (5-0) was to CONTINUE 93-1 to t Planning Commission's May 18, 1993 meeting. HLE 93-2 -- HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION TO ALLOW GREATER THAN 30' HEIGHT IN R-3 ZONE AT 20 FOURTH STREET. Recommended Action: To deny said request. Mr. Schubach stated the applicant proposed the replace. an existing building with a 3 -story, 31 feet dwelling with a 34.5 foot tower above the elevator. Denial was based upon the fact the project did not meet two of the four necessary criteria and Staff recommended denial. He noted the obvious illegal parking in the right-of-way, which was an enforcement issue, and was to be corrected prior to issuance of building permits. Patrick Killen, project architect, stated the small 1495 square foot lot was dead flat. Meeting all site requirements resulted in a total of 1550 square feet livable. space. He noted a correction on the front sheet, in that the third - floor deck was only 46 square feet. The elevator was necessary since the applicant was elderly, and was designed to accent the building. He stated three neighbors supported the 31 -feet height, which was the minimum requirement in order to build upon the lot. Mr. Killen stated he had just received the letters of recommendation citing a wall to eliminate parking, but would try to bring the site into compliance. The wall would be constructed. Responding to the Commission, he agreed that wherever the 30 feet height was exceeded, a decorative open rail could be installed, which would be an acceptable condition. 9 P.C. Minutes 5-4-93 • No one else wished to speak regarding this item, and Chmn. Di Monda closed the Public Hearing at 10:55 p.m. Comm. Oakes stated she wished to see an attempt made to satisfy the Zoning Code by lowering the building height. Comm. Suard suggested this item be continued to allow mitigation measures, as much as possible. He was most concerned with the height of the tower. Comm. Oakes stated she was not concerned with the tower height. Comm. Suard felt that if projects, such as this one, continued to be approved, the Ordinance should be changed in the interests of consis- tency and_ fairness._ __�. .._ Comm. Merl felt the lot was difficult to work with and a reasonable, workable_atti.tudehad been taken. , _ MOTION MOTION by Comm. Oakes, seconded by Comm. Merl, to APPROVE ALE 93-2, with a Condition that anything exceeding 31 feet in height and is fairly minimal be done with decorative open railing, depicted on the elevation plans presented. AYES: Comms. Merl, Oakes, Chmn. Di Monda NOES: Comm. Marks, Suard ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chmn. Di Monda stated this item was APPROVED, subject to appeal to the City Council within 10 days from the date of this meeting. NR 93-1 — AN EXCEPTION TO SECTION 13-7 (b) & c) TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A GREATER THAN O% REMODEL/ EXPANSION AND .E EXTENSION OF WALLS WITH NONCONFORMING SIDE YARD SETBACKS T• NONCONFORMING SINGL AMILY DWELLING AT 2515 THE STRAND. Recommended Action: To app •ve s d request. Mr. Schubach stated Staff h no ficulty with this request, as the plans met Code, •.. s and ob = tives of the Ordinance. He expressed concern th the roof rep ement with the same nonconformities. noted the problems with parking of vehicles in the ont area, explained the po relating to parking requ' -ments of through lots and noted blic Works Dept. recoended the fixing of the curb be a requir-•.-nt. Comm. arks felt the guest parking area was adequate, to w h Comm. Oakes agreed. However, she expressed concern regardin the overhead eaves projection of 18 inches. 10 P.C. Minutes 5-4-93 April 19, 1993 Honorable Chairman and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach Planning Commission May 4, 1993 SUBJECT: HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION 93-2 LOCATION: 20 4TH STREET APPLICANT: ALFRED W. SALIDO 2212 RONDA VISTA DRIVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90254 REQUEST: FOR A HEIGHT LIMIT EXCEPTION, PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING TO EXCEED 30 FEET IN THE R-3 ZONE Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the project as it does not satisfy the conditions for granting an exception as set forth in Section 601. -- Background PROJECT INFORMATION: Zoning: R-3 General Plan: _ High Density Residential Lot Size: 1495 square feet Proposed Building Size: 1947 square feet Existing Use: Duplex The subject lot, which is currently developed with a two story. duplex, fronts on 4th Street (a walk street) and is located on the southeast corner of 4th Street and Beach Drive (an alley). It is on the second row of lots east from the Strand. It is a half lot, containing only 1495 square feet. In 1988, a variance was granted from the then required 17' garage setback from alleys, which would have allowed an expansion of the duplex subject to conditions, including the construction of a 36" wall within the public right-of-way to prevent parking on the right-of-way. The owner never acted on the variance, and the parking on the right of way is still occurring. Analysis The applicant is proposing to demolish_the existing building to construct a new 3 -story dwelling. The proposed height would be about 31 feet, with a 34.5 foot tower above the elevator. To grant this height exception, the project must meet the conditions of Section 601 of the zoning code to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission (copy attached). Based on the information provided by the applicant, and verified by staff in a site survey, the property is surrounded by a neighborhood that is a mix of one, two and three story buildings. The character of the neighborhood is dominated by one and two story building with only a few three story buildings. Only 10 of 56 lots in the vicinity are shown to have structures that exceed thirty feet, with only 1 of 21 on the block bounded by 4th Street, Third Street, The Strand and Hermosa Avenue. The only building on the same block over 30 feet is located two lots to the east, and only the back half of the building is above 30 feet while the front half is at 25 feet in conformance with the requirements for condominiums on walk streets. None of the Strand fronting buildings directly to its west are over two stories. Based on these observations, and on a visual inspection of the surroundings, staff does not believe the proposed project complies with conditions (1) and (2) contained in Section 601. With respect to condition (1), the extension clearly is not necessary to take advantage of scenic views over surrounding structures, since all building to the west are two stories or less. More importantly, given the subject lot's location only one block back from the Strand at the corner fronting on a walk street, scenic ocean views are readily available from the ground floor up. With respect to condition (2), there is clearly not a substantial number of existing buildings in the vicinity of the of the proposed project already constructed over thirty (30) feet. One just needs to take a look at the few that are over 30 feet to see that they are out of character with the surrounding neighborhood scale. None of the Strand fronting lots to the west are over two stories. Whether condition number (3) is satisfied is perhaps less easily determined as views will only be partially impacted, but the new structure will certainly unnecessarily partially obstruct some views by extending above 30 feet. Finally, with respect to sub -section (4) the amount of building that exceeds thirty feet is very small, as it only encroaches one foot. In that sense staff believes condition number (4) is satisfied. However this point is moot, given that at least two of the other conditions are not satisfied. In sum, although the encroachment above 30 feet is rather small, the project clearly does not satisfy the conditions of Section 601, as adopted. The project could be modified to comply with a 30 foot height limit, and still retain all the scenic ocean views being sought. The reason for the extension above 30 feet is partially to compensate for the unusually small lot and so that each floor can have a slightly higher interior clearance than the minimum. allowed, to allow the construction of a roof deck and railing, and to allow the tower for the elevator. According to � C the architect, the elevator is to serve an elderly client. These amenities and conveniences will definitely enhance the project, and improve the liveability of the structure, but they are not grounds to essentially circumvent Section 601. Staff further believes given the circumstances of surrounding properties it is doubtful that any encroachment above thirty feet would satisfy the conditions of Section 601 at this location. If this project is allowed to exceed thirty feet it would'clearly circumvent the intent and'the letter of Section 601. Staff would suggest that if any merit is seen in this proposal because of its minimal amount of encroachment, that the Commission should re-examine Section 601 and perhaps consider amendments. PARKING IN THE WALK STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY It is obvious that illegal parking in the right-of-way east of Beach Drive continues to occur, as posts and chains are installed to control the uses. Staff understands that up to 5 cars are parked on the publc right-of-way. The landlord of the property apparently allows tenants of his other nearby properties to also - park here. As you know, the use of the public right-of-way for parking east of Beach Drive is not permitted. This is an enforcement issue separate from the issue of the height exception that would be required to be corrected by the City prior to issuance of building permits. Michael'-Schubach Planning Director Attachments 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Area Map 3. Section 601 4. Department Comments 5. Application 6. Public Notice Affidavit /D j<en Roberts•n Associate Planner C ARTICLE 6. R-3 MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-3 ZI(') Sec. 600. Permitted uses. In an R-3 zone only the following uses are permitted as are hereinafter specifically provided and allowed, subject to the provisions of Article 11.5 governing off-street parking requirements: (1) Any use permitted in the R-2 zone. (2) Multiple dwellings. (3) Group houses. (4) Condominiums. (Refer to Article 7.2 for additional condo- minium requirements.) (5) A public parking area when developed as required by section 1115, Article 11.• (Ord. No. N.S. 284, § 1, 5-18-65; Ord. No. N.S. 287, § 3, 9-7-65; Ord. No. N.S. 331, § 1, 7-2-68; Ord. No. N.S. 355, § 1, 5-6-69; Ord. No. N.S. 477, § 1, 12-4.73; Ord. No. 86.859, § 4, 10-28-86) "Sec. 601. Height Intent and Purpose. The intent and purpose of this section is to set a standard height limit for most projects in scale with existing development and to minimize view obstruction. However, to recognize that pre-existing development in some neighborhoods and/or clusters of lots are already predominantly built higher than the height limit, this section also allows some projects to exceed the height limit to enable property owners to enjoy the same rights to view, sunlight, and air enjoyed by those property owners with the higher buildings. This section further sets forth the conditions and design criteria for determining whether a project is allowed to exceed the height limit. (A) No building shall exceed thirty (30) feet in height unless in compliance with section 601 (B) and (C). Refer to Article 7.2 for additional height requirements for condominium projects located adjacent to walk streets. (B) The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing and may grant or conditionally grant an exception to allow a multiple or single family building to exceed thirty (30) feet in height up to a maximum of thirty-five (35) feet in height when all of the following conditions are 'met to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission (subject to appeal to the City Council pursuant to Section 1435): 1) An extension above the height limit is necessary to take advantage of a scenic view over surrounding structures which are already constructed above thirty (30) feet in height. Said structures already in excess of thirty (30) feet would otherwise significantly obstruct the proposed project's view potential; 2) A substantial number of existing buildings in the vicinity of .the proposed project are already constructed to a height greater than thirty (30) feet. 3) The structural extension above 30 feet will not adversely impact the available views, and access to sunlight and air of adjacent -and surrounding properties; 4) If all the above conditions are satisfied, the following design features of the portion of the building above thirty (30) feet shall also be considered by the Planning Commission to determine if an exception should be granted: a. The style and pitch of the roof. b. The mass and bulk of the proposed structure above thirty (30) feet (in order to minimize bulk of the upper floor). c. The architectural appearance, --as exhibited by the type, style, and shape of the structure and the proposed exterior materials. (C) Application and public hearing requirements for processing exceptions to the height limit shall be in accordance with procedures established by the City Council." -- I I BACKCR OUND MATER/AC 4TH z6.Q a0 /� 7 BO 237C'# Mt O 6 IO 5 0 3 oho 10 Por. 0 o S T. 1/49 r .• p ZS Cr, • f Cr, k SHEET 2 — o ZS 30 ,30.6 /s 9 ...� /2 II 0p 13 hO1 ) Poi. N't ,1 14 /S9 ,5 Z5 15 17 .90.6 Mme' 2 2.3702.: REV. ASSMT. SEE 4156-6 " v 1 45302,‘ N 3RD w4rr�6''CS� CT. ti i 03.5` ST. v HERMOSA BEACH M.B. 1-25-26 PARCEL MAP F?M.175-19 /00 /00 L < v) 0 cr I 43.6 30 30 ' /s J0 J472 ' 4 14 oh, 15 16 17 18 0)L 3.1n z0 P9 S 30 30 /O so i 03.5` ST. v HERMOSA BEACH M.B. 1-25-26 PARCEL MAP F?M.175-19 /00 /00 L < v) 0 cr I CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Ken Robertson, Associate Planner FROM: William Grove, Director of Building and Safety SUBJECT: 20 - 4th Street DATE: April 27, 1993 ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** 1) No survey was provided. 2) Elevations for each roof element were not indicated. too -}'task enclosufe RECEIVED APR 2 7 1993 PLANNIr.G DEPT. WG/rb J PROJECT ADDRESS CITY OF H E R M O S A \B E A C H 20 44'1 ST . J -k 41 cs,6%- ! c-4-1 Project Name (If applicable) LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT b/ 1 P9gr� ONING 1z3 APPLICANT INFORMATION: (J 5--R117io 901,46 2. / F fdG- KILL..) Phone (lcJ) 376. 9171 Name(s) Mailing Address 4M- MAILHA 'z<N A I , . mf-ATP N 3 = 4-{ , � 9oZ� Applicant's Relationship to Property APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE (TECV PROJECT REQUEST _ Conditional Use Permit Amendment (3805) Conditional Use Permit-Commercial(3812) _ Conditional Use Permit -Condo (3812) Number of Units Environmental Staff Review (3803) Final Map (3810) General Plan Amendment Specific Plan (Amendment) Zone Change (3811) Lot Line Adjustment (3884) Nonconforming Remodel (3866) 74 300' Radius Noticing (3868)-373.5-0 DATE J 1 09, )TT) Parking Plan (3857) Permitted Use Request (3885) Planning Commission Appeals(3888) Precise Development Plan (3867) Tentative Map for Subdivision / Lot Split -(3809) Tentative/Final Map Extension (3883) Text Amendment, Private (3886) Variance (3808) Voluntary Lot Merger (3887) _3;47 %L Total Fees 72-C1) S� FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - RECEIVED BY: DATE OF SUBMITTAL: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: -3fr4&, (LY I Ut c6 - WE Aize rc12. I-tT. ace e°TT o-) (A +13.p -n 3 Cr its- OLP& -rte '"51) (attach additional pages if necessary) OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT* We/I / f 2 D being duly sworn, depose and say that we/I are/am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of our/my knowledge and belief. Subscribed '/ day and sworn before me this of ,_)zn , 1993 . ,0. 74r NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California \):2Lza/Ja76 Own&r s Signature Address n.1lk Qrn„t)ik \ 51., OQ, L 05 An)C4.LE3) CA gova"? Telephone w3 - tAS --2345- OPFiC.IAL NO)T'kiW SEAL > D T cPr'7N Notary Public -- California LOS ANGELES COUNT`( ✓ . My Comm. Expires MAR 03.1O' *Signature required from current PROPERTY OWNER, not owner. in escrow. • • r rat'f • ...... ,r7 ,.........., . lirgree'v, 41 • ..ii - • , , -"mr-,t,v,:t.," 13 -164 1. • , 3,040 At ..4,:,,ovot • ',-."3-i• ''',i.7)tiA*.:•:...,:g".-ir.,1- y! st.;-.. —4,....Liazt, ,-,iz•-zg" u.e.e....laz A.,, ....t., .1 'eiyo-- 1-, ..i..t, :4 6.50.,..,1;,,:..,,p ...s.-• -,•••• 7.,..E;`,.. '..-.,..r. .- ...: , ....'''21.'"4F.RESTE7-•1,,..r.m. . ... .s- .i. ' ...'"•E ......4'14Xy`; (Ret•P ...1, -. '-...' 4... -44,6 _ rtIVri ''';'-'4,Vm4‘..31* ''' 0-: a, ' ' . ., ;4. 1.,,k. t.6..,.:::-.3.79."-:-.7Mr: . •-s.' -,......:, ;,. • • : • mel=7-77, ROAD CLOSED L5U13Jr.C1- 51TE .• •r, !,I 1111121 .4114iall.1111111111 Mei"' LOOK -1H6 lA15T •P-","." VE4LOoW4G 140T-1-1. 'wpm. c.f•-; Pc/ riNfaWki -- . ...4 ; -... ..; '... • '.;`, ? • 6i, • l'" *q..... ',:1••,1 .."'0,,,... .... , ...:.,:,.. ef • ././..1.4:x**:i', ...,..,,,.., -.,„.•!--;..i..„.....--. ,--.1.•,•,.,,p., ,. ,..,,t....,1. .... •:.1.4 ./....,.......j. , ..• :.,t, -'-,,.!1.:.•,, f , I 1 •..,!: ..) ; ' • • '',,,-.. I, 1 J,....,..‘ . , • .,y. ;‘•;,• ' ;......... I; ;1 , . •',..,.^..4''' .., .• 'N.':•": l'•,..'„:;:. .._,,,, i',•, ; -,,r ..:':': ..- . RECEIVED APR 19 1993 VIN LOOKINCv AT -01 5U13.icT SITE •••&..'1../ Wk.:. • VIrJA LOare.1N6 5OUTH li&)ECT 6ITE April 28, 1993 Planning Commission City of Hermosa Beach Re: Variance at 20 4th Street RECEIVED APR 2 8 1993 PLANNING DEPT. I will support the one foot variance requested by the Salidos at 20 4th Street, but I ask that the same requirements that were imposed on their variance in 1988-89 be included as conditions. Prior to granting their previous variance, Pam Sapetto, as the Salidos representative, met with several of us in the neighbor- hood to resolve our concerns. Removing all parking from the right-of-way and enclosing it with a wall (along both 4th Street -- and Beach Drive) consistent with other properties on the block was the number one priority.' Second on the list was a deed restriction to prevent garages being converted to living space. The third request was some landscaping, consistent with the three foot height limit, be put in to mitigate the starkness of looking directly at a garage wall from our living rooms. Unlike properties on the Strand, we face each others yards. If you have looked at the property, you know that the parking is an ugly problem. Currently, posts and chains have been installed to separate spaces assigned to their other properties. As I understand it, that is in conflict with current ordinances governing the use of the right-of-way on the walk streets. I would like to see enforcement of those ordinances a condition of their permit. Sincere Ellen H. Goetz 33 4th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 379-7541 April 26, 1993 Mrs, Ruth Dool 21 4th Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear Planning Department, RECEIVED APR 2 8 1993 PLANNING DEPT. In response to the public notice I received from your office recently, I do have some comments regarding the request for a height variance at 20 Fourth Street. There are issues relating to this property that concern me. As you are probably aware, a variance was requested by this same property in 1988-1989. Restrictions were placed on that variance which I would like imposed on this variance also. Specifically, the chains and posts now existing in the yard facing Fourth Street must be removed, the entire yard facing Fourth Street and Beach Drive must be walled in to expel the existing illegal parking lot that now exists, a deed restriction must accompany the variance, and proper landscaping must be required in the newly created enclosed front yard. As long as the above mentioned restrictions are incorporated into the variance request, I have no objection to the 1 foot variance requested. at 20 Fourth Street. - By the way, I appreciated your notification, for as of today, there is no sign posted on the property at 20 Fourth Street regarding this variance request. Sincerely, Ruth Dool C April 26, 1993 Mrs, Nancy Mazza 21 Fourth Street Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Planning Department City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 '1d30 JNINNHId £661 8 Z ddd a3A1333a Dear Planning Department, In response to the public notice regarding a variance request at 20 Fourth Street, I do appreciate your notification. I was quite surprised to receive your public notice as there is no notice posted on that property. As far as the variance request, I do have some reservations. There was another variance request regarding that same property in late 1988 or early 1989. At that time certain restrictions were placed on that variance that I would expect to also accompany this request. Those restrictions included building a wall to enclose the front yard facing Fourth Street and Beach Drive. They were also to remove the chains and posts now located in this area. As of the present time, this area is being used as an illegal parking lot. During summer and certain holidays the number of cars crammed into that area is unbelievable. A properly landscaped, walled- in front yard would conform much better to the other houses in the same block. During the present renovation to the Strand, Beach Drive has absorbed all the Strand traffic between Herondo and 5th Street. I therefore believe that this illegal parking lot would have some serious safety ramifications. Another restriction accompanying their prior variance request was.a deed restriction, which would also have to accompany this variance request.. As long as these same restrictions are incorporated into this variance request, I really have no objection to the 1 foot height variance at 20 Fourth Street. Unfortunately, I will be out of town on May 4, 1993, thus unable to attend the public hearing. I hope my above mentioned concerns will be considered in the variance request at 20 Fourth Street. Sincerely, Nancy M. za Trustee for the Nancy Toumajian Trust Application for: "(Signature) 139D0-61 Clay 31-Rk (ctpaclty) �y CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH I the undersigned, do declare under penalty of perjury that I did on the rim day of M R , 19 ,3 , mail a notice of the public hearing before the City Council to all residents and property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property. I understand and agree that it is my responsibility to cause these mailings to be made in an accurate and timely fashion and agree to hold the city harmless against any liability whatsoever for any defect of said mailing. I declare, under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. I have executed this declaration on this the pin/ day of , 1973, a Hermosa Beach, California. NI AO WESl MR� a O - F U14T I7 STREET— (Project TREP(Project Location) (N me) dEiCHT LIM/rc cppT1o,)aenta—CreflAS--_, CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT '• State of L' e -ii ieorn / a- County of 40-5 nib Gs li On ‘5.---/.9-9.3 before me,ehti�e. )c,er '/i • � �afa-i ,11,6//C. DATE NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER - E. E DOE. NOT Y PUBUC- personally appeared //14 6,z74_, l/ef_id e S NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed 7 the same in his/her/their authorized 'i �� . OFFICIAL SEAL capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their i ELAINE C. DOERFLING signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), 1I'`'.... -L' NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA or the entity upon behalf of which the ..:P LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1 person(s) acted, executed the instrument. My Commission Expires Oct. 11, 1994 I No. 5193 THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Though the data requested here is not required by law, it could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE WITNESS my hand and official seal. e. Loi -t_ - SIGNATURE OF NOTAR OPTIONAL SECTION TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT OPTIONAL SECTION CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER Though sane does not require the Notary to fill in the data below, doing so may prove invaluable to persons relying on the document 0 INDIVIDUAL 0 CORPORATE OFFICER(S) TTTLE(S) PARTNER(S) (j LIMITED GENERAL 0 ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ▪ TRUSTEE(S) O GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTTTY(ES) NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT May 28, 1993 Mayor and Members of the City Council "44, - Regular Meeting of June 8, 1993 SOUTH SCHOOL PARK: COST ESTIMATES & PRIORITIZATION Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council: Approve the conceptual plan for the park as presented at the April 13,1993 Meeting Direct staff to prepare a requestfar bids for an architectural firm to provide designs and working drawings for the park. Adopt the Commission's plan for prioritization of park development Receive and file the cost estimates for park construction. Background The Commission's recommended conceptual plan for the South School Park was presented to Council the April 13, 1993 Meeting. At that time, Council directed staff to obtain cost estimates for park development and requested that the Commission prioritize park development in light of a potential phased construction. The Commission approved the recommendations above and schedule for phased development as presented in the analysis below at their May 17, 1993 meeting. Analysis Keeping mindful of the fact that a phased development will likely add to the cost of park construction in the short and long run, the Commission approached phasing from a logical park construction standpoint. That is, all of the site preparation work would be done at the same time which would not only be efficient but would also be cost effective as prices for materials is reduces as vohune increases. Listed below are the four (4) phases recommended by the Commission: PRELIMINARY PHASE: MASTER PLAN This phase would be initiated with the obvious first step of obtaining architectural services to provide the City with a master plan and working drawings for the park. This plan Pagel would serve as the framework through which the City will be able to secure bids for either total or a phased park development. Using an 8% of project cost figure to estimate the cost of architectural services, the City could expect to pay from S40-60 thousand for the preparatory phase. PHASE I: SITE PREPARATION Despite the fact that the most desirable park elements would not be included in the first phase, there is an obvious logical progression to construction that dictates the initial phase. Included would be: Site demolition and prep work; grading; drainage; preliminary electrical work and irrigation. Though it represents a substantial cost, this phase would not result in any visible park improvements. Cost estimates are as follows: Sazaki: $201,545 American: $293,750 Moss: $ 65,000 PHASE II: LANDSCAPING / PAVING/SECURITY LIGHTING The committee elected to "put the green" in the park next. Due to the fact that the completion of this phase would render the park usable (though totally passive), the committee thought it would be critical to combine the landscaping efforts with paving to accommodate pedestrian and vehicular access. It would be equally important to provide security lighting and fencing at this time as appropriate to ensure park safety compatibility with the neighborhood. Cost estimates are as follows: Sazaki: $408,616 American: $365,250 Moss: $186,620 PHASE III : FURNISHINGS AND RECREATION FACILITIES This final phase would put the activities in the park to include: picnic areas, plaza seating, tot lot, basketball/volleyball court, tennis courts and restrooms. Once the park is defined by the landscaping and paved areas, the recreation facilities can be phased incrementally and/or there may be areas for interim facilities (i.e., put a low cost sand volleyball court in the proposed hard court area for the combination court). The committee did not prioritize individual recreation facilities as it was thought that (depending on when this phase is initiated), community input could determine the top priority facilities. Cost estimates are as follows: Sazaki: $140,689* American: $143,500 Moss: $223,400 page2 *added $50,000 for restrooms not included in bid. ESTIMATES Attached you will find three (3) preliminary estimates for park construction: one from Brian Mitchell of Sazaki & Associates; one from American Landscape, Inc; and one from Lawrence Moss & Associates. Staff requested estimates from several other firms, however, it was difficult to gain timely responses from them as their priorities were with official bids and paid projects. Clearly, the range of estimates and the differences by phase pose some difficulties in obtaining a meaningful average. The median cost by phase for park development would total approximately $784,000 while the mean would be $724,377. Obviously, the best estimate the City will obtain will be through the competitive bid process. The completion of the Preliminary Phase will provide the City with the framework for the construction bid process. CONCLUSIONS The Commission still feels strongly that total park construction would be favored over a phased development both from a cost standpoint and in order to provide the residents with the use of the park as soon as possible. Recognizing the limitations of the Park and Recreation Facility Tax Fund, an exploration of alternative funding sources will be critical to meeting this objective. With the $100,000 currently budgeted in CIP #92-515 and the anticipated $240,000 from Proposition A, the City may not be able to exceed Phase I in the near future (which means that there would be no usable park space). Absent emerging State gram sources, a loan from the general fund (i.e., UUT surplus) to the Park and Recreation Tax Fund would be the only viable avenue for total park development at this time. Attachments: Preliminary estimate: Sazaki & Associates Preliminary estimate: American Landscape, Inc. Preliminary estimate: Lawrence Moss & Associates Conceptual Plan: South School Site Respectfully Submitted, Concur. 1,4 Frederick R. Ferrin, Resources Director City Manager page3 SASAKI ASSOCIATES, INC. 2036 Armacost Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310) 820-4882 (310) 820-4669 Fax STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST SOUTH PARK May 3, 1993 Page 1 of 3 1A. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL COSTS ITEM UNIT DIVISION 1 MOBILIZATION/GENERAL Allow CONDITIONS DIVISION 2 02550 Site Demolition L Chain link fence 2. Chain link fence and reset - 3. A.C. paving 02110 Clearing 1. Dozer and brush rake 02210 Grading 1. Import and spread 025100 Paving & Surfacing 1. A.C. 3" thk. 2. Concrete a. walk b. basket ball w/equip. c. tennis court w/fence d. picnic pad 3. Curb - 6" 4. Surface in tot lot 02580 Pavement Marking 1. 2" wide 02650 Water System 1. 4" PVC. 2. Drink Fountain 520 LF 330 LF 40,970 SF COST Allow 1.90 11.60 1.20 13.50 PROJECT NO. 30707.00 3.5 A 1,675.00 1,390 CY 16,857 SF 1.15 39,970 SF 4.00 4,200 SF Allow 13,200 SF Allow 5 EA 500.00 1,260 SF 5.50 1,090 SF 8.00 25 stall 1.60 160 LF 6.90 1 EA 1,250.00 35,050.00 988.00 3,828.00 SUBTOTAL $ 49.164.00 $ 53,980.00 ler 3.862.00 $ 5,862.00 18.684.00 $ 18,684.00 19,385.00 159, 880.00 15,100.00 35,000.00 2,500.00 6,930.00 8320.00 $ 247,515.00 40.00 $ 40.00 1,104.00 1.250.00 $ 2,354.00 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST SOUTH PARK May 3, 1993 Page 2 of 3 IA. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL COSTS PROJECT NO. 30707.00 ITEM UNIT COST SUBTOTAL, 027100 Sub -drainage 1. 6" drain 600 LF 4.50 2,700.00 2. C.B. Allow 1,000.00 1.000.00 $ 3,700.00 02810 Irrigation 1. Turf 99,967. SF .65 64,978.00 2. Ground -cover 44,702 SF 1.10 49,172.00 3. Backflow 1 EA 2,650.00 2,650.00 4. Point of Connection 1 EA 345.00 345.00 $ 117,145.00 02860 Play Equipment 1. Tot Equipment Allow 4,000.00 4,000.00 2. Bike Rack Allow 1,000.00 1.000.00 $ 5,000.00 02870 Site Furnishings 1. Shade structure 4 EA 6,000.00 24,000.00 2. Picnic tables 9 EA 1,500.00 13,500.00 3. Benches 7 EA 800.00 5,600.00 4. Trash enclosure 5 EA 400.00 2,000.00 5. Bollard 5 EA 400.00 2.000.00 $ 47,100.00 02910 Landscaping 1. Soil Prep. 144,669 SF .12 17,360.00 2. Fine grading 144,669 SF .10 14,467.00 3. Weed control (pre -emerge) 144,669 SF .02 2,893.00 4. Shrub (1 gallon) 920 EA 4.15 3,813.00 5. Groundcover 44,702 SF .15 6,705.00 6. Turf - (hydroseed) 99,967 SF .05 .4,998.00 7. Tree a. 15 gallon 105 EA 65.00 6,825.00 b. 24" box 25 EA 215.00 5,375.00 c. 36" box 17 EA 600.00 10,200.00 8. 90 Day Maintenance 144,669 SF .09 13.020.00 $ 85,661.00 DIVISION 3 1. Tot -lot Seat Wall 80 LF 35.00 2,800.00 2. Hdcp. Ramp walls 230 LF 75.00 17,250.00 3. Stairs 822 SF 12.00 9.864.00 $ 29,914.00 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST SOUTH PARK May 3, 1993 Page 3 of 3 1A. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL COSTS PROJECT NO. 30707.00 ITEM DIVISION 5 1. Metal handrail UNIT COST 275 LF 25.00 6.875.00 $ 6,875.00 DIVISION 6 1. 2 X 4 header brd. 60 LF 3.00 1.800.00 1,800.00 DIVISION 16 1. Point of Connection Allow 2,500.00 2,500.00 2. Walkway light 45 EA 1,500.00 67,500.00 3. Ramp light niche 20 EA 270.00 5,400.00 4. Telephone MC MC 0. $ 75,400.00 SUBTOTAL: $736,080.00 Contingency 10% $73,608.00 COST TOTAL: $809,688.00 SUBTOTAL Based on Preliminary Site Plan (dated 1/12/93) by Parks, Recreation and Comihunity Resources Advisory Commission. Summary: $160,344.00/Acre $ 3.68/S.F. May 25, 1993 Ms. Mary C. Rooney, Director Community Resources Department City of Hermosa Beach 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, California 90254-3885 Re: South School Park Site, Hermosa Beach Budget Proposal for Site Development Dear Ms. Rooney: Via FAX/Mail We are pleased to submit for your consideration the following preliminary cost estimate for the site development of the above referenced project. We propose to furnish all labor, materials, equipment and services necessary to perform all site development in strict accordance to the plans and specifications prepared by Sasaki Assoc., plans numbered 1 and 2, plans dated January 12, 1993. All the above work shall be completed in a professional and workmanlike manner, according to standard practices. Our cost breakdown is as follows: Item Amount SEE ATTACHED The attached preliminary cost estimate is based on the project being completed by December 31, 1995. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and we are looking forward to working with you on the successful completion of this project. If you have any questions, or need further information, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, LANDSCAPE, INC. Sal Berumen Marketing Manager 11 7949 DEERING AVENUE, CANOGA PARK, CALIFORNIA 91304 • (818) 999-2041 • FAX (818) 999-2056 American Landscape, Inc. • SOUTH SCHOOL PARK SITE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE I 111101.11. • r -- - 11111•11 \ NEW REST RCCM ELDG. SITE PREP. WORK ALLOW 50,-000 SOUGH GRADING - ; ALLOW 50,000 SITE DRAINAGE 1 ALLOW 25,000 SITE LIGHTING 45 @ 2,500 112,509 A.C. PAVING & PARKING LOT STRIPING 17,000 @ 1.50,-+ 25 @ 100 :,000 CONCRETE CURB WORK 1250 @ 12 15,0000 ,CONCRETE PAVING (WALKWAYS: BASKETBALL COURT) :,50 • . 1 UTILITIES DOMESTIC WATER FIRE HYDRATE r ALLOW •, la,000 IRRIGATION WORK 145 , 000 @ . 75 108,750 ___ 1SIGNAGE ALLOW • 2,500 ' LANDSCAPE WORK 145,000 @ .50 • 72',•500''' TOT LOT EQUIPMENT -•�• — _ ALLOW La, 000 BASKETBALL COURT EQUIPMENT 2 @ 750 - 1,500 TENNIS COURT WORK 13,000 @ 4.00 52,009 MISC. SITE FURNISHINGS • - • _ _ ALLOW 30,000 0 DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD 145,000 @ .05 - 2,259 ItAtOPIWAOSILIZATION goeVERIOXII General Cond. -25,000 CONTINGENCY 10% 73,475 TOTAL 1 $808, 225 i MAY- 7-93 FRI 13:32 city +7f hers o=abeach P.'i4 ' I SOUTH SCHOOL PARK SITE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE , LAWRENCE R. MOSS & ASSOC. 3458 OCEANVIEW BLVD. GLENDALE, CA 91208 (818) 248-5200 APRIL 20,1993 NEW RESTROOM BLDG. 100,000.00 SITE PREP. WORK 4,000.00 ROUGH GRADING 11,000.00 SITE DRAINAGE 3,500.00 SITE LIGHTING 12,000.00 A,C. PAVING & PARKING LOT STRIPING 12,800.00 CONCRETE CURB WORK 12,100,00 CONCRETE PAVING (WALKWAYS, BASKETBALL COURT) I 67,720,00 UTILITIES (DOMESTIC WATER, FIRE HYDRATE) ' 6,500.00 IRRIGATION WORK 40,000.00 SIGNAGE 4,200.00 LANDSCAPE WORK $65,000.00 TOT LOT EQUIPMENT ! 25,000.00 BASKETBALL COURT EQUIPMENT 8,400.00 TENNIS COURT WORK 55,000.00 MISC. SITE FURNISHINGS 35,000.00 60 DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD 5,000.00 PROFIT, MOBILIZATION & OVERHEAD 38,000.00 TOTAL $505,220.00 1• I•. W 7 I1 ou.o•RY 01 •ust.0 r•ortlls, 1 WAI WAY • GAMO ti ACCEII 4 OI .f/Rt[1 • /i 1• I. I• I. ••.• I •..I.•II• I I, •ou11oM. M 11110410 •110•l11tV 11.11: .• . II •r-ti� • ,. 1• 1. I• •1'•I•P•Mo Or - POOL - �_.i �i�i%� w�ii��.• ••• n MRRI, 1•CGVITION •..D CevwWrTY fkaYou GN /.O.II.o.7 GO.•w�t •ION CITY OF IIERMOSA DE ACI 10POGMAr111C SUAYY 300111 SCHOOL PARK SI It hRGt-11AIrU f1i' ; rTe PV.N ./11WM 1... . (T la w/I —11 r r. — !MSS COu11t I WAI WAY • GAMO ti ACCEII 4 OI .f/Rt[1 • /i 1• I. I• I. ••.• I •..I.•II• I I, •ou11oM. M 11110410 •110•l11tV 11.11: .• . II •r-ti� • ,. 1• 1. I• •1'•I•P•Mo Or - POOL - �_.i �i�i%� w�ii��.• ••• n MRRI, 1•CGVITION •..D CevwWrTY fkaYou GN /.O.II.o.7 GO.•w�t •ION CITY OF IIERMOSA DE ACI 10POGMAr111C SUAYY 300111 SCHOOL PARK SI It hRGt-11AIrU f1i' ; rTe PV.N ./11WM 1... . (T la w/I —11 r r. — nW}04011Tri4j1. ,oink/KII;d • •,.�7r V+• G•fDOM•+IYN• SECTION A •R. •• rt•AY M•A'L' AVT• M 1+T Ir 1.11.6.1.004 TanN.• •e+1.T .1ar.n4 •••AT r;\ SECTION A CONT'O lafTr•,o' aucrftv RAT Ww1T/0104 / Y..L•YM1.4 •RA•• 00.0.01 PARR1NI 1•11T SECTION I M•R•T•M•/W14111►0•44 ON*? IRA•• emus p !LECTION QDAY 1.1111.120 O I • I•• 10100.011.1011 110000 104101 01*a1 MRN 11•M•IWI• vA44S? /,••.nIM• IM+••• CoLECTION C i . 160 00 ••..r_AY +on,..WY ,r••r_-.•o •r. :.1hNG, reG Az ANT IOfV nNG C7vyl rl'1Y !�@O of nco.r GOw:H.6SION • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTH SCHOOL PARK SITE PRG..IMAANW I -BCT —@Slrm. 00.0.• r r r. r. w. ayal • r=.—` •,ies . Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council June 8, 1993 t June 3, 1993 Regular Meeting of GREENBELT LANDSCAPING RECOMMENDATION FROM PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION • Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council, approve the staff to request bids for the proposed landscaping of the Greenbelt. Formal bids will be required for (1) purchase of the irrigation equipment, (2) purchase of the trees and (3) the installation of the trees. The bids will be submitted.to the City Council for review and approval. Background: The greenbelt was closed to parking on February 5, 1993 with the erection of barricades across the driveway entrance. A curb was later constructed across the driveway. The City is now ready to proceed with detailed landscaping of the portion of the greenbelt formerly occupied by the parking. The City Council on January 5, 1992 determined that the landscaping shall be in keeping with the existing theme and topography of the greenbelt. That theme is a path in the middle, trees, inexpensive plantings such as iceplant on either side and no provision for future parking. Analysis: City staff proposes to accomplish the Council's plan in the following manner. 1. A planting layout has been prepared using City staff. This plan was reviewed by the Parks & Recreation Commission on May 17, 1993. Staff will provide the working drawings at the meeting. Since the drawings are prepared by staff and will be used by staff, they do not have the same measure of sophistication that the drawings would have if we were using them to obtain bids from contractors. This does not, nevertheless, detract from the receipt of a high quality professional end product. 2. Type of landscaping and location was prepared with the assistance of the City Parks Leadman. The plan utilizes trees approved by the Department of Forestry grant. 3. The staff needs City Council approval to go out to bid for the irrigation system parts. The cost of this equipment is estimated to be approximately $8.000 to $10,000 dollars and formal biding will be required for City Council review and approval. Installation is to be done by City's park staff. 4. Acquisition of trees and planting of those trees will be done by contract with funds received by the City under the Forestry grant. This will also require formal biding and the City Council's approval. 5. Planting of iceplant will be done by the City cre*s with assistance from people working in the California Conservation Corps or in the Court Referral Community Service Program. Iceplant cuttings will be obtained from existing iceplants elsewhere on the greenbelt. 6. Accent plants in addition to the iceplant will be selected for high color, unusual foliage and growth habit. Fiscal Impact: Estimated budget cost Estimated budget cost Estimated budget cost and accent plants Estimated budget cost Pier Avenue Estimated budget cost for the 60 feet north of Pier Avenue Estimated in-house labor cost Contingency for irrigation equipment $10,000 for trees and installation $17,600 for landscaping ground cover for the 60 feet south of Respectfully sub• tted, Charles McDona d Director of Pub is Works pworks/gbrec 2 Total Concur: $ 4,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $10,000 $ 4,000 $57,600 Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager May 28, 1993 Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the City Council June 8, 1993 STRAND SAFETY: PRELIMINARY REPORT Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council: Review the three (3) alternatives listed in the analysis below designed to assist with Strand Safety on the short term. If desired, direct staff to implement and/or provide additional study on an alternative(s). Direct the City Attorney to determine the legality of building a separate path west of the Strand (or widening the existing Strand) per the existing deed restrictions on the beach. Background Due to the mixed recreational uses of the Strand, safety on the beachfront path has been the topic of many Council meetings and subcommittees throughout the years. A variety of alternative solutions to mixed-use conflicts have been proposed and either implemented or filed away in favor of retaining the historic flavor of the Strand. Staff has collected past Strand studies which are currently on file at the City Clerk's Office. In response to recent letters and concerns raised by residents, Council directed staff to examine suggestions as presented by the residents and to provide the Council with recommendations regarding pedestrian safety on the Strand. Staff is seeking direction from Council to determine if the objectives listed below match with the Council's in approaching Strand safety and if any alternatives warrant further study or trial implementation. page 1: Strand study 10 ESTABLISHING THE MODEL In order to frame the discussion about Strand safety, it is necessary to establish evaluation criteria that would provide measurements against which each alternative can be evaluated. If any of the assumptions listed below are changed, various alternatives would stack -up differently. To begin with, staff is working on the assumption that there is a problem for pedestrians on the Strand as Council has requested a solution to the problem and due to the fact that concerns have been raised by residents and safety personnel on the topic. Staff assumed that the ideal solution(s) would provide for maximum recreational access and use of the entire beachfront area. Those uses would include bicycles, skates and pedestrians. While some may disagree with the opinion that all uses should be accommodated, staff feels strongly that the ability of recreational users to traverse Hermosa Beach is essential to the survival of the downtown business district (including restaurants, shops and motels); provides continuity with our neighbors to the north and south; and encourages non-polluting modes of transportation in our City. Keeping that in mind, the ideal solution would also improve safety for all users to include: establishing reasonable speeds for skaters and cyclists; providing safe crossing areas for beach goers (often overlooked but likely one of the key Strand safety issues); and allowing for safe and peaceful pedestrian use of the path. The ideal solution would also need to be simple from an enforcement standpoint and should be easy for tourists and other visitors to understand. The benefits of an enforceable solution(s) are obvious as it is in the best interest of the City to simplify enforcement in order to provide time for more pressing public safety issues. Aesthetics cry for consideration also as the Strand and beachfront are intrinsically beautiful. Solutions that would clutter the area with excessive or unattractive signs and/or obstacles would not be desirable. Finally, budgetary constraints need to be considered for any immediate solutions as both the general fund and CIP funds are severely limited at this time. page2: Strand study PAST SUCCESSES It is noteworthy that the City has addressed some important Strand safety issues already. The signal by the Pier (that flashes during high impact times) has worked very well as a means of providing a safety zone at the busy Pier head. And with reconstruction underway, cracks and irregularities on the Strand surface will be eliminated which should reduce hazards for all users. BUILDING A SEPARATE PATH With the exception of pedestrian crossing (and perhaps budget constraints) this alternative would meet all of the established criteria for an ideal solution to the Strand safety issue. As staff is well aware, this topic is controversial and has been clouded by conflicting views on the deed restrictions to the beach and the legality of encroaching on the beach. The R/UDAT study as well as recommendations from the Downtown Improvement Board (DIB) would suggest that this alternative warrants serious exploration. Perhaps there would be a mutual interest from the City and the Chamber of Commerce to obtain a firm decision about deed restrictions. SHORT TERM SOLUTIONS: EXISTING STRAND Absent the prospect of a separate path, staff suggests the following list of alternatives be reviewed by Council for potential implementation and/or further exploration: Pedestrian Crossing/ Slow traffic As noted above, pedestrian crossings are the culprit in many Strand collisions. Residents often site the difficulty people have in stepping out from the beach or street onto the Strand. Many do not pay attention (i.e., youngsters) making the situation more dangerous. page3: Strand study Solution #1: Select congested streets (i.e., 2nd Street, 8th Street, 22nd Street) and provide pedestrian crossing zones (see Attachment A). Paint friendly (unobtrusive) markers on the Strand to remind cyclists and skaters that pedestrians have the right-of-way. If desired, these areas could also be "walk -your -bike" zones to build on the proven track record of the traffic signals. These zones would not only assist with crossings but would periodically slow down traffic along the path. The idea could easily be piloted on a street or streets prior to total implementation. Pedestrian use of the Strand In retaining the commitment to allow for all recreational uses, providing a haven for pedestrians becomes the more difficult component to solve. Residents have made suggestions that include establishing a pedestrian zone on the North end; providing a dividing line to separate pedestrians from the rest of the users; and establishing alternate routes for bikes (i.e, Hermosa Avenue). Although the idea of a pilot program with pedestrian zones is interesting, staff does not favor the concept of restricting uses on the Strand on one end of the Strand or another both from an equity and enforceability standpoint. Staff would instead favor efforts that are consistent along the length of the Strand that would provide a solid program for pedestrian safety. Next, while creating an alternate bike path through the City on a street like Hermosa Avenue may be beneficial in and of itself, staff would suggest that to consider this as a way to eliminate cyclists_ from the Strand would be seriously missing the mark. With few exceptions, people who cycle and skate on Hermosa's Strand do so primarily to enjoy the beachfront (just as pedestrians do) - not as a means of "getting through town." Solution #2: Provide a 4' wide pedestrian division line (width of standard sidewalk). Mark periodically (see Attachment B) to identify the use. page4: Strand study This solution may pose some difficulties as the Strand is only 20' wide. Typical bike paths are 10' wide. To double that standard (to allow for north and south traffic) would require the entire width of the Strand. Additionally, a standard sidewalk is not conducive to the kind of strolling typically associated with pedestrians on the Strand who may travel in groups and/or wish to meander. Solution #3: Establish limited "pedestrian only" hours on the Strand. Permit cyclists to walk bikes through or take an alternate route (Le, Hermosa Avenue). Staff has some real concerns about the enforceability of this kind of a program as there would be some difficulty in determining how to inform users of the hours (i.e, signs). Furthermore, precluding any group of recreational users to the full use of the Strand at any hour may be problematic from an equity standpoint. Skaters would have a problem fitting into this solution as the option of skating on a busy street would not be wise from a fimctional or safety standpoint. NEXT STEPS Staff has presented this preliminary report in an effort to obtain additional guidance from the Council to determine if any of these alternatives or any previously suggested solutions should be implemented or studied in the short term. It is evident from the analysis above, that staff favors piloting alternative #1 above the others at this time. Staff is also aware that this option alone would not satisfy the concerns raised by residents of late. Taking personal opinions aside , the reality of mixed recreational uses on the beachfront is well-established not just in Hermosa Beach but in many coastal communities. In most cases (including our neighboring cities), a separate path for pedestrians and other users is in place. With a solid answer regarding the possibility and desirability of a two (2) path system (or widened single path), the City will be better able to establish a solution or solutions that may put this issue to rest for once and for all and even more importantly pages: Strand study will provide residents and visitors with safe and pleasant access to our beautiful beach. Respectfully Submitted, M. jk C. Rooney : Community Resources Director & Strand Safety Subcommittee: Acting Chief Straser Public Works Director MacDonald Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager page6: Strand study STRAND PEDESTRIAN RING r; ........................••••••••••••••••••••••••••• tif) ATTACHMENT A PEDESTRAIN PATH • ......,........•••••......••• ..... .............. ATTACHMENT B B.J. Mitchell P.O.Box 865 Hermosa Beach. CA 90254 (310) 372-5676 Remarks to City Council on 6/8/93: I support fully one of the recommendations in the Strand Safety Subcommittee for short term solutions to the safety issue, and I support another with some modification. Solution # 1, to provide pedestrian crossing zones, is an excellent suggestion which should be implemented immediately, including the requirement to "walk your bike" through those zones. This should also be part of any long term solution as well. Solution #2, to mark off part of the existing Strand for pedestrians, is also an excellent interim solution. However, the width should be 8 feet, not 4 feet. The north end of Hermosa's existing bicycle path is currently 12 feet wide, including both north and south traffic. I see no reason why the rest of the Strand should not be the same width. I am sure that 20 feet is ideal for bicycle traffic, as stated in the report, but this is not an ideal situation we are dealing with. This is a compromise, short term solution to a very troublesome issue. Assigning 12 feet to wheeled traffic and 8 feet for pedestrian traffic would be very fair. The 12 feet strip would slow down wheeled traffic during those times when the Strand is being heavily used, which is entirely appropriate, and it would allow the full Strand to be used for wheels during those periods when pedestrian traffic is light. A 12 foot strip allows for single file bicycles in each direction, which is adequate for any heavily used area, such as ours. Allowing only 4 feet for pedestrians will solve nothing, because it is unworkable. Pedestrians will simply be pushed off the Strand entirely and, once again, the interests of one community of users will take precedence over others. If it is true. as the report states. that "people who cycle and skate on Hermosa's Strand do so primarily to enjoy the beachfront...", then they should not object to slowing down so that they can see it. In that situation, one lane each way for vehicles should be perfectly adequate. The reality is that many cyclists and skaters want to travel at high rates of speed, and for them a separate path should be provided. Solution # 3 is not a workable solution and should not be considered. The Committee's recommendation to seek legal finality to the restrictions in the original deed, is an absolute necessity before continuing with any solution that would put a second path on the beach. It is my understanding that a lawsuit against the City would be required in order to get a final determination by the Court. I am willing to do that if an attorney can be found to take the case in the public interest. /0 June 3, 1993 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council of June 8, 1993 RECOMMENDATION TO APPOINT INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND APPROVE RECRUITMENT FOR CITY MANAGER Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Appoint Mary Rooney as Interim City Manager effective July 1, 1993 and establish a salary for the interim appointment; and, 2. Authorize recruitment for the position of City Manager. Background: On May 25, 1993, City Manager Frederick Ferrin announced his resignation effective June 30, 1993. Analysis: Interim Appointment: Following Mr. Ferrin's announcement, the Council indicated that Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney would be appointed interim City Manager. It is requested that the City Council formalize this action and establish a salary for the interim period. The current salary for the City Manager is $7,300/mo. Recruitment: It is recommended that the Council authorize the Personnel Director to solicit application/resumes for the position of City Manager. It is recommended that the recruitment be done in-house with the Council involved in review of resumes received. If this is approved, staff will return at the next Council meeting with a tentative time line for the recruitment. Staff would also appreciate Council direction regarding the timing for scheduling interviews of City Manager candidates in light of the fact that there will be Council elections in November. If it is Council's direction to have candidate interviews following the election, the recruitment time -line will be adjusted accordingly. If not, the process could be conducted along a time -line which would allow for interviews to be scheduled as early as October. 1 11 Alternative: 1. Solicit proposals from recruitment firms to conduct the recruitment. Respectfully sub ted: Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director Concur: Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager 7:::10c,Le tice Azrz..." CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: The Planning Commission SUBJECT: Potential Issues to be Placed on the November Ballot DATE: June 2, 1993 The Planning Commission is requesting that the Council consider placing the issue of private parking along walk streets between Hermosa Avenue and the Strand on the November ballot. The Commission is making this suggestion in recognition that an - initiative movement is already underway in regards to this issue, and thus it would be more cost effective to include it on the November ballot. Further, the Commission is in agreement, based on previous advisory votes and the General Plan, that the people would like to see public open spaces protected to the maximum possible, and that any private use for parking or other purposes should include a fee or permit that would provide income to the City. - 1 - 13 a The City Council June 8, 1993 Hermosa Beach, Ca. Dear Lady and Gentlemen, I urge you to place on the November ballot, an advisory vote on the following question; "Shall we evolve from representative government to direct democracy in Hermosa Beach?" I believe that the time has come for direct democracy in America, and in Hermosa Beach. Our Nation's founding fathers were aware of the ancient practice of democracy in the City - States of Greece, as well as of their contemporaries in the town halls of New England when they opted for representative, republican government. The size of the country and the limit- ations of communications technology made democracy in its pure form impracticle. Today, we are on the verge of possessing the capability to join all eligible voters in an "electronic town hall" to decide the issues of the day. We must know if the people are willing to take on this responsibility. This vote has all of the potential of those first vollies at Lexington and Concord to be the signal for the begining of a second American Revolution; one in which the people take power from the politicians. One day historians may note that it was our tiny city on the sand that fired the shots heard around the world. Thank you all for your service and consideration of this matter. Sincerely, 2530 The Strand Hermosa Beach, Ca. mes F. O'Brien SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATiOM 13 a CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Michael Schubach, Plan' /p uthector // SUBJECT: City Council / Planning Commission Joint Workshop Meeting • DATE: June 2, 1993 Planning Commission, at their meeting of June 1, 1993, selected Thursday, July 22, 1993 as the City Council/Planning Commission workshop meeting date. Three topics have been added. The suggested topics are as follows: 1. Adult Uses a. National City adult use legal case b. City's adult use ordinance 2. RUDAT / Pier Improvement 3. Undergrounding Utilities 4. Planting of Median on Pacific Coast Highway Frederick R. Ferrin City Manager p/memo5 13b 4• H w w cc cnH N) THE S T R A N D R I V E HERM OSA H w w H U, L 4- A V E, 11.25 fisa a proposed sip/e farrd/y res/deNce PROJECT DATA owner: project address: legal description: zoning: lot area: occupancy: construction type: area tabulation: BUILDING FOOTPRINT LOT COVERAGE FIRST FLOOR LIVING GARAGE SECOND FLOOR LIVING THIRD FLOOR LIVING DECK ROOF LEVEL DECK TOTALS TOTAL LIVING TOTAL DECK GROSS BUILDING AREA MR. ALFRED SALIDO 2212 RONDA VISTA DRIVE LOS ANGELES, CA. 90027 20 FOURTH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CA. THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 8 AND THE WEST 5 FEET FRONT AND REAR OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 4 OF HERMOSA BEACH, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGES 25 AND 26 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT THAT PASSES THROUGH A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 8 THAT IS DISTANT SOUTHEASTERLY THEREON 47.95 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8. R-3 1 495 SQUARE FEET R-3 DWELLING M-1 PRIVATE GARAGE TYPE V -N 693 SQUARE FEET 955 • I 63.8% 333 360 955 659 146 391 1947 537 2844 ARCHITECTURE STUDIO 9 ONE 2 PATRICK J. KILLEN, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. 912 MANHATTAN AVENUE MANHATTAN BEACH, CA. 90266 310/376-9171 RCr r APR \ gµ3 tv�• N C, to N N 0 0 r 47'-6" 6'-10" 17'-5" 9'-3" BEACH 47.95' DRIVE OEM LANDSCAPED BUILDING PROJECT M en C' ON ABOVE LAUNDRY CON CONCRETE . N C') GUEST PERKING ENTRY TWO CAR GARAGE 0 0 C N N M // FENCE ELEVATOR 0 ih LANDSCAPED FENCE PROPERTY LINES 47'-6" site plan / first floor plan SCALE: 1/4" = 1 ' - 0" 30'-0" STREET CENTERLINE PROJECT ADDRESS cC Z CC 0 LL J Lu U LLI CC H V) w 02 F�—/ Lr �/'� Vi OD 0 M W O w N rJ/0/.176-/877 0.J/0/M-9/7/ do r oie eto N e. A new single family residence 22'-8" w J 0 O cn O O f 0 0 2 m r m 0 O 28'-3" PROJECT ADDRESS 20 FOURTH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA • STUDIO ARCHITECTURE 9I1 A/4161/A//W,4 YI/F 4140114770 2701CALIFa9MA 90766 Ill J/0/J76-9/7I T50JI0/176 - I612 arza A new single family residence PROJECT ADDRESS 20 FOURTH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA STUDIO ARCHITECTURE 9 f 7 MANHA//ANAL£(/( ARA A//AN 8£AC// CALFORNLA 9 0266 /!L J / 7116 - 9/7/ £AYJ / 0/J76 - / 812 en A new single family residence 28'-3" 4'-8" 18'-0" 5'-7" v / / 3'-10" 5'-6" 4'-2" 14'-9" 28'-3" PROJECT ADDRESS 20 FOURTH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 01 O 0) 6) STUDIO ARCHITECTURE 9 / 1 A/AN/,UTANAVEM/E, A/ANHA7/AN 159C/ 01/90RN// 9 02 6 6 //L J / 0/J 76 - 9 / 7 / 1:4,1"J / 0/J 76 - /82: TEMPERED GLASS GUARDRAIL,TYPICAL SCREED LINE GLASS BLOCK RECYCLED SPANISH TILE CHIMNEY VENT EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER WITH ROUGH IRREGULAR TEXTURE, TYPICAL EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER WITH SMOOTH STEEL TROWELED FINISH, TYPICAL \ROLL -UP GARAGE DOOR west elevation SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ,) 41']�K'L 1��) 1PJ�.y>1f/7,^f/\'' -2' ^\?1/4.'VAy,.-iec„ , 1'/i1�If'141 '+-•11i''�!fsArry�-N('3' st 111 -v ---9� � �0,� 1 d .�. /3 / 1�'. J��1-�ti /�, 1 )X -31-t c 71R L AII�i ") / \ 1 f A C S -�^ h ` / � 4 • / / , C. 1.... ,' .4 •/ 4 , r- -, ,.,,,,-1- , n / 7 r 1��') %,, 1/ ' 11A 1" �-,-1--1-1A i 11' ..) --/� 1 P i�1 _) east elevation SCALE: 1/4" = 1 ' - 0" ONC:RETE MASONRY UNIT WALL WITH (ROUGH CEMENT PLASTER FINISH FINISH GRADE, TYPICAL RADIUS CORNER TREATMENT, TYPICAL DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON GRILLE PROPERTY LINES, TYPICAL li COPPER VENT CAP RECYCLED SPANISH TILE ROOFING yN south elevation SCALE: 1/4" = 1 ' - 0" RAMDOM SHAPED TILE MOSAIC, TYPICAL WOOD FRAMED FRENCH DOOR r _/ L.1 PA ALAA DECORATIVE GRILLE WOOD FRAMED SLIDING GLASS DOOR D 0 TEMPERED GLASS AUTHENTIC CUSTOM ENTRY DOOR north elevation SCALE: 1/4" = 1 ' - 0" WOOD FRAME WINDOWS, TYPICAL PROJECT ADDRESS 1- CC F— CC D 0 LL. 0 CN HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA A new single family residence e. A new single family residence PROJECT ADDRESS 20 FOURTH STREET HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 3 1'- 0" 31_61' / / 8'-0" - 7" H C) D L) m Z C) 2 1=d'1=0' ILO / 2 O Z n O O H C) T m Z II N33adOO 1_71 JI 21 0" 1-0 10' 3'- 0 311-0 I STUDIO ARCHITECTURE / 9/7 ,UANHA77ANAiEM/E, 41AN/lw7L4N 6EACH, CAl/TOBN/A 90766 ICL J/0/J76-9/7/ f4%J/OJ'J76 - /821