The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05/10/94tii/0\4_ s /io /cc-f. Where there is no vision the people perish... HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WELCOME! By your presence in the City Council Chambers you are participating`in the process of representative._government. Your government welcomes your interest and hopes you will attend the City Council meetings often. Meetings are televised live on Multivision Cable Channel 3 and replayed the next day (Wednesday) at noon. Agendas for meetings are shown on.Channel 3 the weekend before the meetings. Opportunities for Public Comments Citizens may provide input to their elected Councilmembers in writing or orally. Letters on agenda matters should be sent or delivered to the City Clerk's or City Manager's Office. If sent one week in advance, they will be included in the Council's agen- dapacket with the item. If received after packet compilation, they will be distributed prior to the Council meeting. Oral communications with Councilmembers may be accomplished on an individual basis in person or by telephone, or at the Council meeting. Please see the notice under "Public Participation" for opportunities to speak before the Council. It is the policy of the City Council that no discussion of new items will begin after 11:30 p.m., unless this rule is waived by the Council. The agendas are developed with the intent to have all matters covered within the time allowed. In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Office of the CityClerk at (310) 318-0204. Please provide enough time to enable us to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. Note: City offices are open 7 A.M. to 6 P.K., Mon. - Thurs.; Closed Fridays. There is no smoking allowed in the Council Chambers. (over) THE HERMOSA BEACH FORM OF GOVERNMENT Hermosa Beach has the Council -Manager form of government, with a City Manager appointed by and responsible to the City Council for carrying out Council policy. The Mayor and Council decide what is to be done. The City Manager, operating through the entire City staff, does it. This separation of policy making and administration is considered the most economical and efficient form of City government in the United States today. GLOSSARY The following explanations may help you to understand the terms found on most agendas for meetings of the Hermosa Beach City Council. Consent Items ... A compilation of all routine matters to be acted upon by one vote; approval requires a majority affirmative vote. Any Councilmember may remove an item from this listing, thereby causing that matter to be considered under the cater ory Consent Calendar items Removed For Separate Discussion. Public Hearings ... Public Hearings are -held on certain matters as required by law or by direction of Council. The Hearings afford the Public the opportuni- ty to appear and formally express their views regarding the matter being heard. Additionally, letters may be filed with the City Clerk, prior to the Hearing. Ordinances ... An ordinance is a law that regulates government revenues and/or public conduct. All ordinances require two "readings". The first reading introduces the ordinance into the records. At least 5 days later Council may adopt, reject or hold over the ordinance to a subsequent meeting. Most or- dinances take effect 30 days after the second reading. Emergency ordinances are governed by different provisions and waive the time requirements. Written Communications ... The public, members of advisory boards/commissions or organizations may formally communicate to or make a request of Council by letter; said letters should be filed with the City Clerk by Noon the Tuesday preceding the Regular City Council meeting and request they be placed on the Council agenda. Municipal Matters ... Non-public Hearing items predicted to warrant discussion by the City Council are placed here. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Manager ... The City Manager coordi- nates departmental reports and brings items to the attention of, or for action by the City Council. Verbal reports may be given by the City Manager regarding items not on the agenda, usually having arisen since the agenda was prepared on the preceding Wednesday. Miscellaneous Items and Reports - City Council ... Members of the City Council may place items on the agenda for consideration by the full Council. Other Matters - City Council ... These are matters that come to the attention of a Council member after publication of the Agenda. "Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothin changed until it is faced." - James Baldwin AGENDA can be REGULAR MEETING HERMOSA BEACH CTTY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 10, 1994 - Council Chambers, City Hall Regular Session - 7:00 p.m. MAYOR Sam Y. Edgerton MAYOR PRO TEM Robert Benz COUNCIL MEMBERS John Bowler Julie Oakes J. R. Reviczky CITY CLERK Elaine Doerfling CITY TREASURER John M. Workman CITY MANAGER Stephen R. Burrell CITY ATTORNEY Charles S. Vose All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND. The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. Complete agenda packets are available for public inspection in the Police Department, Fire Department, Public Library, the Office of the City Clerk, and the Chamber of Commerce. During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council foyer. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATION: i NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION WEEK MAY 15 22,1994 PRESENTATION OF "EMPLOYEE OF nit QUARTER" AWARDS: Richard Contreras, Community Services Division Michael Flaherty, Public Works Department PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Under the provisions of the California Government Code, the City Council is prohibited by law from taking immediate action on any Public Participation unagendized item unless it can be demonstrated to be of an emergency nature. (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Members of the Public wishing to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. (Exception: Comments on public hearing items must be heard during the public hearings.) Please limit comments to one minute. Citizens also may speak: 1) during Consent Calendar consideration or Public Hearings; 2) with the Mayor's consent, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters; and, 3) before the close of the meeting during "Citizen Comments". Citizens with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are requested to submit those comments to the City Manager. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. Letter from James Lissner dated April 28, 1994 regarding the film ordinance. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following more routine matters will be acted upon by one vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless good cause is shown by a member prior to the roll call vote. * Council member requests to remove items from the Consent Calendar. (Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item 3.) * Public comments on the Consent Calendar. (a) Recommendation to approve the following minutes: 1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular meeting held on April 21, 1994; 2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on April 26, 1994. (b) Recommendation to ratify Demands and Warrants Nos. through inclusive. (c) Recommendation to receive and file Tentative Future Agenda Items. (d) Recommendation to deny the following claims and refer them to the City's Liability Claims Administrator: 1) Claimant: Simon, Richard 2) Claimant: Shean, Robert Scott 3) Claimant: Leonard, Roy Memorandum from Personnel Director/Risk Manager Robert Blackwood dated April 26, 1994. (e) Recommendation to adopt resolution establishing the terms and conditions of employment for the Hermosa Beach Management Association. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 27, 1994. (f) Recommendation to approve lease renewal agreement for South Bay Free Clinic for the use of Room 7 in the Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 26, 1994 (g) Recommendation to approve lease renewal agreement for Project Touch for the use of Rooms 3 & 11 in the Community Center. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 26, 1994. (h) Association of Volleyball Professionals (AVP) request for paid priority seating. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 28, 1994. (i) (I) Recommendation to approve the 1994 Women's Professional Volleyball Association (WPVA) Tournament on June 17, 18 & 19, 1994. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated May 1, 1994. Proposition "A" fund exchange with City of West Hollywood for acquiring General Fund. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 29, 1994. (k) Request from the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation to hold Bayou Bash Fund-raiser on Clark Field. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 26, 1994. (1) Recommendation to adopt a resolution approving Final Map #22601 for a 2 - unit condominium unit at 316 - 26th St. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 2, 1994. (m) Recommendation to authorize the_purchase of Sierra Systems Software. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated May 3, 1994. 3 (n) Recommendation to adopt a resolution for approval of Wheelchair Ramp Construction Application for Funds - TDA Article 3 Funds for FY 1994-95. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated May 4, 1994. (o) Recommendation to adopt a resolution of support for the South Bay Area Signal Synchronization Pilot Project 1. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated May 3, 1994. Request for time extension for submission of 1994-95 Preliminary Budget. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 3, 1994. Recommendation to adopt a resolution of intent to study permitted uses in certain zones. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 4, 1994. (r) Recommendation to adopt a resolution that will authorize amendments to the contract with California Department of Forestry (CDF) in order to receive reimbursement of $17,600 for trees planted on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated May 4, 1994. 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES. a. ORDINANCE NO. 94-1108 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING MOTION PICTURE FILMING AND OTHER TRANSIENT ACTIVITIES AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 17, 22 AND APPENDIX A OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. For adoption. Memorandum from Deputy City Clerk Naoma Valdes dated April 28, 1994. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. * Public comments on items removed from the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M. 4. TEXT AMENDMENT TO CONSIDER ELIMINATING OR MODIFYING THE REQUIREMENT THAT CITY COUNCIL MODIFICATIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS, ON APPEAL OR RECONSIDERATION, BE REFERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 3, 1994. 4 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 13 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES. (Continued from meetings of April 12, 1994 and April 26, 1994) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 3, 1994. 6. TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING HEIGHT" AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF "GRADE". (Continued from meetings of April 12, 1944 and April 26, 1994) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated May 3, 1994. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM PROGRESS REPORT. (Continued from meeting of April 26, 1994) Memorandum from Interim Building & Safety Director Michael Schubach dated May 3, 1994. 8. APPROVAL TO HIRE A CONSULTANT TO CONDUCT DOWNTOWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN STUDY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated May 3, 1994. 9. POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST/INCOMPATIBLE ACTIVITIES OF CITY OFFICIALS. (Continued from meeting of April 26, 1994) Memorandum from City Attorney Charles S. Vose dated April 20, 1994. 10. REQUEST TO OBTAIN AN OPINION ON THE ISSUE OF VESTING CONCERNING THE OIL PROJECT RELATIVE TO THE INITIATIVE. (Continued from meeting of April 26, 1994) Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 5, 1994. 11. PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROHIBITING DOGS ON ACTIVE SCHOOL GROUNDS IN THE CITY. (Continued from meeting of April 26, 1994) Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 19, 1994. 12. REQUEST OF THE SOUTH BAY ALANO CLUB TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY AND BUILDING LOCATED AT 702 - 11TH PLACE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 5, 1994. 13. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER a. AMENDMENT OF SIGN ORDINANCE. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated May 5, 1994. 5 14. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL NONE 15. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Requests from Council members for possible future agenda items: Recommended Action: 1) Vote by Council whether to discuss this item; 2) refer to staff for a report back on a future agenda; or 3) resolution of matter by Council action tonight. a. Request by Mayor Edgerton to have City Council oppose AB 122 which would amend mobilehome residency laws. b. Request by Council member Benz for discussion of elimination of the 6% Utility Users Tax. c. Request by Council member Benz for discussion on modifying our entertainment permit. d. Request by Council member Benz for discussion regarding individual department budgets to reflect Workmen's Compensation claims. CITIZEN COMMENTS Citizens wishing to address the Council on items within the Council's jurisdiction may do so at this time. Please limit comments to three minutes. ADJOURNMENT May 3, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 PRESENTATION OF OUTSTANDING EMPLOYEE AWARD The City of Hermosa Beach Employee Performance Award honors City Employees who have displayed either sustained performance above expected levels or have performed a one-time action that exceeds expectations. Nominations for the award may be by citizens, City Council Members, department heads and other employees. From the nominations, the Management Team selects the award recipient(s). For the 3`d quarter of FY 93-94 (January, February & March) the Management Team has selected the following employees for recognition. Richard Contreras, Meter Maintenance Specialist Community Services Division Richard started his career with the City 21 years ago as a parking lot attendant. Following that initial appointment, Richard has served as a Parking Enforcement Officer; been promoted to General Services Field Supervisor; and currently holds the position of Parking Meter Specialist. Following reorganization of the General Services Department into the Police Department, there was a significant need identified for additional field supervision as well as office management. Following the identification of these needs, Richard readily agreed to assume a greater role in the field supervision of Parking Enforcement Officers and in the management of Base III office activities. In fact, to more effectively address his additional responsibilities, Richard voluntarily adjusted his working hours to facilitate the supervision needs of the division. These additional tasks are being accomplished while maintaining a high level of efficiency in his regularly assigned responsibilities as Meter Maintenance Technician. If the above were not enough to qualify him for this recognition, he volunteered to accept responsibility for coordination and supervision of the Crossing Guard program. As coordinator for this program, Richard acts as the Division's liaison to school staff and the parents of children attending school in Hermosa Beach. Throughout his career, Richard has demonstrated himself to be a valuable member of the City team. He is continuing this standard of professionalism as a responsible and effective member of the Community Services Division management team. Michael Flaherty, Superintendent Public Works Department Mike's career with the City started in April 1974 when he was employed as an Animal Control Officer. Following his transfer to the Public Works Department, he progressed through the ranks from Maintenance I, to Maintenance II to Crewleader and finally to his current position as Public Works Superintendent. Mike has received this recognition twice before for his outstanding performance in his regularly assigned duties and for his willingness to assist the Community Resources Department and the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission with their projects along the Greenbelt and in the City's parks. Mike is again being recognized for his sustained performance as Public Works Superintendent as well as his "beyond the call of duty" volunteer efforts with the Veterans Memorial Committee to help them meet their goal of completing the Veteran's Memorial for dedication on May 21'. In addition to scheduling and coordinating Public Works crews in their efforts with the Committee, Mike has spent numerous volunteer hours assisting in building forms, installing irrigation, landscaping and any other task that needs completing. Mike is an asset not only to the Public Works Department as a dedicated employee but also to the City as a well-respected resident. This award is presented as a special thanks for Mike's exemplary attitude. His professionalism both on duty and off makes Mike a positive role model for all City employees. It is a sincere pleasure to present both these outstanding employees for recognition. Respectfully subaih Robert A. Blackwood Personnel Director 2 Concur, /4") Stephen R. Burrell City Manager James Lissner 2715 El Oeste Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 376-4626 April 28, 1994 City Council, Mayor, and Mayor Pro --tem City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, California 9024 For May 10 meeting, Written Communications Honorable 'Councilmembers: RECEIVED MAY 0 2 1994 CITY MGR. OFFICE During this meeting, or perhaps at the next Council meeting, you will be adopting rules significantly liberalizing the extent to which residential zones can be used for commercial purposes (the "film ordinance"). Since it is apparently your wont to reduce regulation in town, a logical next step would be to remove the requirement for, licensing for businesses operated from homes. If it is your decision to retain that requirement, 1 would like to suggest that the councilmernbers who do not have a license for the business they operate from their home set an example by obtaining a license. Sincerely, 9-WLoth,c, bi MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of'Hermosa Beach, California, held on April 21, 1994, at the hour of 8:25 P.M. ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton Absent: None CLOSED SESSION - At the hour of 8:30 P.M., the Council adjourned to a closed session for the purpose of discussion of matters of Meet and Confer; matters of Pending Litigation pursuant to government Code Section 54956.9(a): Natural Resources Defense Council v. Beverly Hills et al. (Hermosa Beach); and , matters of Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a): Allen v. City of Hermosa Beach, Baker v. City of Hermosa Beach, Sea Sprite Ltd.; Dewey Falcon; Steven Hunt and Arnold Cattani v. City of Hermosa Beach, and Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa Beach. At the hour of 10:22 P.M. the closed session adjourned to the Adjourned Regular Meeting. CITIZEN COMMENTS - None ADJOURNMENT - The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned on Thursday, April 21, 1994 at the hour of 10:25 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, April 26, 1994 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. ' ate_ 0, OtegeS-- Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 04-21-94 Page 8492 a Ci) MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TRE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, held on April 26, 1994, at the hour of 7:1Q P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Matt Cruse, resident ROLL CALL: Present: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton Absent: None PROCLAMATIONS: HIRE A VETERAN WEEK - Mayor Edgerton declared the week of May 1 - 7, 1994 as "Hire a Veteran Week" and presented a Proclamation to Michael O'Kane from the Veteran's Services Division of the Employment Development Department. SAFE SCHOOLS WEER - Mayor Edgerton declared the week of May 2-6, 1994 as "Safe Schools Week" and presented a Proclamation to Jan Hilger, Principal of Hermosa Valley School. ANNOUNCEMENTS - Mayor Edgerton announced that tonight's meeting would be adjourned in memory of Father Terry Scott Franklin, former Associate Pastor at American Martyrs Church in Manhattan Beach who was killed in an automobile accident in the state of Washington; and, in memory of Sam Remington, 70 year resident of the South Bay and manager of "The Mermaid" restaurant for the past 28 years. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (a) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Ken Marks - 223 Valley Drive, spoke as a Veteran's Advocate through his activity with many Veteran Affairs groups; thanked the City for highlighting the National "Hire a Veteran Week"; said Vietnam Veterans were the largest single group, comprising between 50 to 60 percent, of the homeless; said there had been 205,000 suicides of Vietnam Veterans, far higher than the 58,000 names on the wall; thanked the City for recently hiring a Veteran; thanked Chip Scholz of B.F.I. for helping with a program to have B.F.I. hire more Veterans; thanked all in Hermosa Beach for their contributions to the Veteran's Memorial at the Community Center and invited all to attend the Opening Ceremonies on May 21, 1994, at 10:00 A.M.; Betty Evans - 1769 Valley Park Avenue, spoke of the benefits of a pedestrian street in Hermosa; said they were always a gathering spot in other cities; said it would bring access to the beach and the downtown shops by having a street without City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8493 cars as people were more relaxed and inclined to stroll and to look in shop windows; June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, thanked Ken Marks for his dedication; said she felt it was commendable that the City Clerk was not accepting salary during her vacation; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., presented her research on the amount paid to their Chamber of Commerce by other cities as: Lynnwood - $50,000; Redondo Beach - $42,300; Torrance - $41,300; Gardena - $34,992; El Segundo - $0; Hawthorne - $0; Carson - $0; Long Beach - $0; and, Rolling Hills - $0; Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, said the packets distributed to the press were not complete as item 6 did not have all the material, and the Council was not given all of the letters that had gone to the Planning Commission; questioned if anything had been done regarding his charge of conflict of interest regarding City officials serving with the Chamber of Commerce and asked that Mayor Edgerton and Councilmember Bowler refrain from participating in any Chamber related items on the agenda; Gary Wayland - 1097 Aviation Blvd., Chairman of "Vision Hermosa", said "Vision Hermosa" was a non-profit organization that had raised $30,000 to help implement the suggestions made by R/UDAT and was about to send out a Request for Proposals for an Economic Development Officer; said he supported "Street Scene" and as Chairperson of the Business Advocacy Committee was in favor of easing the requirements for C.U.P.s; and, Michael O'Kane - Economic Development Department, thanked the City for its Proclamation for "Hire a Veteran Week" and announced an upcoming seminar for Veterans on "Survival Alternatives" to be held Tuesday, May 3, 1994 from 1:00 to 5:00 P.M. at the American Legion Hall, 1109 Van Ness in Torrance. (b) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION (1) LETTER FROM THE HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DATED APRIL 19, 1994 REGARDING THE CHAMBER'S SPONSORSHIP OF CITY AND BUSINESS PROMOTION EVENTS DESIGNED TO HELP STIMULATE THE ECONOMY IN HERMOSA Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Warren Barr - Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce President, said the letter had been sent in order to clarify the role of and the funding for the Chamber and to explain the advantages of Chamber programs; Carol Hunt - Chamber of Commerce Executive Director, responded to recent misstatements and said City City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8494 officials and staff involvement was not a conflict of interest, but rather a positive spirit of cooperation between the City and the Chamber that is helping Hermosa Beach to move forward in a positive direction. Action: To receive and file the letter. Motion Bowler, second Benz. So ordered. At 7:42 P.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to the public hearings starting at item 4. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Action: To approve the consent calendar recommendations (a) through (i), with the exception of the following item which was removed for discussion in item 3, but is shown in order for clarity: (h) Reviczky. Motion Benz, second Bowler. So ordered. No one came forward to address the Council on items not removed from the consent calendar. (a) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES: (1) Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting held on March 29, 1994; and, (2) Minutes of the Regular meeting held on April 12, 1994. Action: To approve the minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of March 29, 1994 and the minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 12, 1994 as presented. (b) RECOMMENDATION TO RATIFY THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS Nos. 47036 through 47216 inclusive, noting voided warrants Nos. 47036, 47037, 47061, 47070, and to approve cancellation of certain warrants as recommended by the City Treasurer. Action: To ratify the demands and warrants as presented. (c) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. Action: To receive and file the tentative future agenda items as presented. (d) RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE THE MARCH, 1994 FINANCIAL REPORTS: (1) Revenue and expenditure report; (2) City Treasurer's report; and, (3) Investment report. Action: To receive and file the March, 1994 financial reports as presented. (e) REQUEST FOR 30 -DAY EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT OF TWO PUBLIC WORKS FIELD PERSONNEL AND ONE POLICE SERGEANT. City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8495 I (f) Memorandum from Personnel Director Robert Blackwood dated April 12, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to extend for 30 days the temporary appointment of two Public Works Field Personnel and one Police Sergeant. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION TO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH MULTIVISION FROM THE PREVIOUS EXTENSION THROUGH THE END OF MAY, 1994 TO A NEW DATE OF AUGUST 31, 1994. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated April 19, 1994. Action: To approve the Cable Television Advisory Board and staff recommendation to extend the City's contract with MultiVision from the previous extension through the end of May, 1994 to a new date of August 31, 1994. (g) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE ADVERTISEMENT FOR COMPETITIVE BIDS FOR SWEEPING OF CITY STREETS. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 18, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the advertisement for competitive bids for the sweeping of City streets. (h) RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A GROUNDWATER OBSERVATION WELL IN THE GREENBELT AT 24TH STREET FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY WEST BASIN BARRIER PROJECT. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 20, 1994. This item was removed from the consent calendar by Councilmember Reviczky for separate discussion later in the meeting, due to concern regarding the impact of this project. Public Works Director Amirani responded that there currently was a well at Edith Rodaway Park that was monitored every four to five months and it would take approximately two weeks to drill the well. Councilmember Benz left the dais at 11:40 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, questioned why equipment was at Edith Rodaway Park so long. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to approve the Los Angeles Department of Public Works Permit to construct a groundwater observation well in the Greenbelt at 24th Street to monitor the intrusion of seawater into the groundwater aquifer. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. So ordered, noting the absence of Benz. City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8496 (i) RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM, with Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 20, 1994. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 94-5678, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING REPRESENTATIVES TO ACOUIRE FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE AGENCY FOR SURPLUS PROPERTY." 2. CONSENT ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 94-1107 - 'IAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW TEMPORARY USE AND CLOSURE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS AND STREET FESTIVALS.", for adoption. Memorandum from Deputy City Clerk Naoma Valdes dated April 18, 1994. Action: To adopt Ordinance No. 94-1107. Motion Benz, second Oakes. AYES: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton NOES: None 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION Items 1(i) was heard at this time but is shown in order for clarity. Public comments on items removed from the consent calendar are shown under the appropriate item. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION AND METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF GRADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT, with an Ordinance for introduction and waiver of full reading. (Continued from the meeting of April 12, 1994.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 19, 1994. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Manager Burrell also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:55 P.M. Seeing no one come forward to address the Council on this item, the public hearing was closed at 7:55 P.M. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to continue this item to the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994. City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8497 Motion Reviczky, second Benz. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 5. TEXT AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 13 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES, with an Ordinance for introduction and waiver of full reading. (Continued from meeting of April 12, 1994.) Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 4, 1994. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Vose responded to Council questions and suggested that Council set the policy and send it back for review rather than make detailed changes in the Ordinance language at this time. The public hearing opened at 8:19 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, spoke regarding non -conforming use in the commercial zone. The public hearing closed at 8:20 P.M. Action: To continue this item to the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994, with the direction that Council would set the policy considerations only at that time. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. 6. TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW MOTION PICTURE FILMING AND OTHER TRANSIENT ACTIVITIES, with an Ordinance for introduction and waiver of full reading. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 20, 1994. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Vose and Community Resources Director Rooney also responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 8:23 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Jim Hamilton - 3417 Hermosa Avenue, suggested that the proposed Ordinance did not have reasonable safeguards for residents; suggested that it should read 15 days annually, not consecutively, with a longer filming time requiring a public hearing; requested that residents be given written notice of filming as early as possible; suggested that Hermosa explore the policies of other cities and submitted information from the City of Pasadena; Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, spoke of crowds drawn by filming and events that took place in other locations; said filming lowered property City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8498 values; objected to filming in residential areas and objected to allowing 15 days of filming; Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., concerned with the impact of filming on parking as three blocks of parking could be taken by a film crew; questioned the amount paid for parking by a film company and questioned how the amount of space was determined; Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, said residents lose parking due to filming in the area; said the rate was the same no matter how large the crew; said trucks, noise and crowds should be substituted for filming to see if the City wants to be "film -friendly"; Warren Barr - Chamber of Commerce President, said Southern California has been the traditional home to the film industry, but now many companies are moving out; said many residents in Hermosa work in the film industries and could lose employment; and, Janet Hamilton - 3417 Hermosa Avenue, said less costly sound stages were the reason many film companies left Southern California not City filming regulations; said the residents needed safeguards such as a limit on the number of days allowed for filming with resident consent needed for over four days and adequate notice to residents; spoke of the "Beverly Hills 90210" court case. The public hearing closed at 9:17 P.M. Action: To introduce Ordinance No 94-1108, as amended on page three, line six, ".... in issuing or denying permits, including appeal rights thereto, and which shall be incorporated...". Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. Further Action: To waive further reading of Ordinance No. 94-1108, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING MOTION PICTURE FILMING AND OTHER TRANSIENT ACTIVITIES AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 17, 22, AND APPENDIX A OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Motion Benz, second Bowler. AYES: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton NOES: None Final Action: To direct staff to notice the policy for filming as a public hearing for the Regular Meeting of May 24, 1994, and to include: consecutive days and total time of filming; specific resident noticing policy; appeal process; possibility of a dual time frame of short term of three days or less versus long term of over three days; a City liaison for long term filming; night versus daytime filming; a review of Ordinances from other cities; create a City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8499 handout guideline that provides definitions and requirements; review the guidelines used by Pasadena; fee structure for permits; and, a filming incentive. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. The meeting recessed at 9:52 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:20 P.M. HEARINGS 7. SPECIAL STUDY OF THE COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USE LIST INCLUDING ADDING OR DELETING THE REOUIREMENT FOR C.U.P.'s FOR CERTAIN USES. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 14, 1944. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. City Attorney Vose also responded to Council questions. The hearing opened at 10:52 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: June Williams - 2065 Manhattan Avenue, spoke to correct statements attributed to her in the Planning Commission minutes; and, Joseph Di Monda - 510 Ninth Street, Planning Commissioner, spoke to the item. The hearing closed at 10:55 P.M. Proposed Action: To advise the Planning Commission, for future study, to delete the requirement for C.U.P.s on all uses listed in the City Code. Motion Benz. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Action: To continue the requirement for C.U.P.s for "Liquor Store, retail, off -sale" on page 19 of exhibit B, for further definition of grocery stores and liquor stores. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Reviczky. So ordered. Proposed Action: To allow "business schools" and "catering business", on page 19, exhibit B, in C-1 and C-2 zones. Motion Benz. City Attorney Vose advised that this could not be discussed under the Brown Act as it had not been included in the noticing. Motion withdrawn. Further Action: To advise the Planning Commission, for future study, to delete the requirement for C.U.P.s for "Circus or carnival, temporary" on page 18 of exhibit B, on the permitted use list. Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. So ordered. Further Action: To advise the Planning Commission, for future study, to delete the requirement for C.U.P.s for "Entertainment, special performance" on page 19 of exhibit B, on the permitted use list. City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8500 Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. So ordered. Further Action: To advise the Planning Commission, for future study, to delete the requirement for C.U.P.s for "Fortune tellers, psychics, and astrologers" on page 19 of exhibit B, on the permitted use list. Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. So ordered. Further Action: To advise the Planning Commission, for future study, to delete the requirement for C.U.P.s for "Gymnasium/health and fitness center" on page 19 of exhibit B, on the permitted use list. Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. So ordered. Proposed Action: To create a C.U.P. for "Gun Shops", page 19, exhibit B. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Benz, Bowler, and Reviczky. Action: To continue "Publishing Business" on page 20 of exhibit B, for further discussion of why it is not permitted in the C-1 and C-2 zones after proper notice . Motion Oakes, second Mayor Edgerton. So ordered. Proposed Action: To advise the Planning Commission, for future study, to delete the requirement for C.U.P.s for "Restaurant/cafe with beer and wine" on page 20 of exhibit B, on the permitted use list. Motion Benz, second Bowler. The second was withdrawn on the advice of the City Attorney that it constituted a conflict of interest. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Further Action: To continue "Restaurant/cafe with beer and wine" on page 20 of exhibit B, for further discussion of what is required by the A.B.C. for licensing. Motion Oakes, second Reviczky. So ordered. Proposed Action: To advise the Planning Commission, for future study, to delete the requirement for C.U.P.s for "Reverse vending machines" on page 21 of exhibit B, on the permitted use list. Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion failed due to the dissenting votes of Oakes, Reviczky and Mayor Edgerton. Proposed Action: To advise the Planning Commission, for future study, to delete the requirement for C.U.P.s for "Surfboard manufacturing" on page 21 of exhibit B, on the permitted use list. Motion Benz. The motion died due to the lack of a second. Final Action: To direct staff to bring back a Resolution of Intent for the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994 to direct the Planning Commission to review the permitted uses within certain zones; consult with the City Attorney and the City Manager to determine which conditions are enforceable; and, City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8501 to continue the discussion of phase 2 to the Regular Meeting of May 24, 1994, with proper noticing. Motion Benz, second Mayor Edgerton. So ordered. At 11:40 the order of the agenda was returned to item 1. MUNICIPAL MATTERS 8. REDUCE PARKING ENFORCEMENT TIME LIMIT IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND INSTITUTE ONE HOUR FREE PARKING AT LOWER PIER AVENUE DURING THE MONTH OF MAY. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 19, 1994. At 11:45 P.M. Councilmember Benz returned to the dais. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Garrison Frost - "Coast Drug" owner, said that downtown businesses needed to compete with other business areas that offered free parking; spoke in favor of one hour free parking; suggested that if Allright Parking felt this hurt the parking lot business they could be released from their contract; Patricia Spiritus - 1610 The Strand, Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission, said the one hour free parking could be used as a public relations tool to get people to come to the downtown area; suggested that there had not been a problem before the holidays when the meters had been bagged; Jim Dewey - 711 Manhattan Avenue, said one month was not long enough for a trial period, should be 3 to 6 months, possibly in the winter; suggested the one hour free parking should be expanded to the entire downtown area; suggested that court fines and ticket monies should be used for non- recurring expenses; and, Dallas Yost - "Pacific Screen Print" owner, said some businesses on Pier Avenue needed the one hour turn over in order to get people in and out but Hermosa Avenue needed longer time periods, such as three hours, for parking; suggested that the parking lots could be metered and bring in as much, or more, revenue; suggested that a cost/benefit study be done on the parking enforcement. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the report. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Oakes. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Benz. City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8502 9. MINIMUM STANDARDS TO ALLOW TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE FOR SPECIAL' EVENTS, with Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Public Works Director Amy Amirani dated April 21, 1994. Supplemental Resolution from City Attorney Vose received April 26, 1994. Public Works Director Amirani presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Warren Barr - Chamber of Commerce President, requested that item f of the Resolution be deleted; Helene Frost - "Coast Drug" owner, said the criteria of street closures should be to help the businesses impacted by the closure and should not take place during the peak sales periods for the businesses; Gloria Anderson - Fiesta de las Artes Chairperson, asked that item f of the Resolution be eliminated; Lex Honyak - representing "Hennessey's", said "The Lighthouse" and "Hennessey's" supported the street closure during the Volleyball Tournament; said the booths should be around the street median and not in front of shops; said any film footage of the shops on Pier Avenue would be helpful; Carol Hunt - Chamber of Commerce Executive Director, requested that item f of the Resolution be deleted; and, Parker Herriott - (requested his address not be listed), questioned if this needed to go to the Coastal Commission. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to adopt the City Attorney's supplemental Resolution No. 94-5679, entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES AND MINIMUM REOUIREMENTS FOR PERMITS TO ALLOW TEMPORARY USE AND CLOSURE OF PUBLIC STREETS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS AND STREET FESTIVALS.", as amended on page two, section (f) to delete the present wording and substitute, "Subject to the review and recommendation of the Downtown Business Area Enhancement District Advisory Commission." Motion Benz, second Bowler. The motion carried, noting the dissenting vote of Reviczky. 10. UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM PROGRESS REPORT. Memorandum from Interim Building & Safety Director Michael Schubach dated April 18, 1994. Action: To continue this item to the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8503 11. PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROHIBITING DOGS ON ACTIVE SCHOOL GROUNDS IN THE CITY, with Ordinance for introduction and waiver of full reading. Memorandum from Community Resources Director Mary Rooney dated April 19, 1994. Action: To continue this item to the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. At 12:40 A.M. the order of the agenda was suspended to go to item 14. 12. LOS ANGELES COUNTY LIFEGUARD AND BEACH MAINTENANCE SERVICES: MAY 5, 1994 PUBLIC HEARING -BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. Memorandum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooney dated April 19, 1994. Assistant City Manager Rooney presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor to draft a letter to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors for their May 5, 1994 public hearing which outlines the City's concerns which include: 1) historic and current regional responsibility of the County to care for the beaches; 2) the City's inability to subsidize this expensive service; 3) potential long term funding solutions; 4) the difficulties the City would have in mobilizing adequate services by the April 1, 1995 deadline; and, 5) beach services as a health and welfare issue. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion carried unanimously. 13. POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST/INCOMPATIBLE ACTIVITIES OF CITY OFFICIALS. Memorandum from City Attorney Charles S. Vose dated April 20, 1994. Action: To continue this item to the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. 14. REOUEST OF BILLY D. GRAY AND MARY E. GRAY TO MODIFY A LIEN AGREEMENT PLACED ON THEIR PROPERTY AT 1115 -17TH STREET IN 1981 TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS. Memorandum from City Manager Stephen Burrell dated April 21, 1994. Supplemental letter from Bill and Mary Gray dated April 22, 1994. Supplemental memorandum from City Attorney Charles S. Vose dated April 25, 1994. City Manager Burrell presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. Coming forward to address the Council on this item was: City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8504 Bill Gray - 1115 - 17th Street, spoke to his request and explained the background to the lien. Proposed Action: To erase the lien and return the $750 cash deposit. Motion Mayor Edgerton. The motion was withdrawn by the maker. Action: To approve the staff recommendation to subordinate the lien to the new first Deed of Trust. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Reviczky. The motion carried unanimously. At 1:01 A.M. the agenda was returned to item 12. 15. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY MANAGER - None 16. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS AND REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL a. VACANCIES - BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PLANNING COMMISSION - UNEXPIRED TERM ENDING JUNE 30, 1995. Memorandum from Deputy City Clerk Naoma Valdes dated April 20, 1994. Action: To direct the City Clerk's Office to advertise the vacancy and return the item for the Regular Meeting of June 14, 1994. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Oakes. So ordered. 17. OTHER MATTERS - CITY COUNCIL Request from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items: (a) Request by Council member Benz to consider a 5 day work week for all customer service related departments. (Continued from meetings of March 22, 1994 & April 12, 1994) Action: To continue the item to the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. (b) Request by Mayor Edgerton to City Attorney for report regarding vesting of Macpherson oil contract. Action: To continue the item to the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994. Motion Mayor Edgerton, second Benz. So ordered. CITIZEN COMMENTS Coming forward to address the Council at this time were: Parker Herriott - (requested his address not be listed in the minutes), objected to street closure; and, City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8505 Jim Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, said the public record should contain all of the comments made. ADJOURNMENT - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach adjourned in memory of Father Terry Scott Franklin, former Assistant Pastor of American Martyrs Church in Manhattan Beach and Sam Remington, 70 year resident of the South Bay and manager of the Mermaid Restaurant for the last 28 years, on Wednesday, April 27, 1994 at the hour of 1:13 A.M. to the Regular Meeting of Tuesday, May 10, 1994 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes 04-26-94 Page 8506 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H OLIN*BELL SPRING CLASS INSTRUCTOR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 PAGE 0001 DATE 05/04/94 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK # DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 04277 001-400-4601-4221 00417 $,60.00 04/18/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLAS5/PROR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H STEVEN OR JOHANNA*BLALOCK SPRING CLASS REFUND 04488 001-300-0000-3893 04/25/94 $560.00 04480 $30.00 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $30.00 H ERIKO SAKAI*CHAPMAN SPRING CLASS REFUND 05700 001-300-0000-3894 04/25/94 00719 $20.00 /OTHER RECREATION PROGRMS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $20.00 H COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR CHECKING ACCT INTEREST H COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAR CLAIMS/MARCH 94 H COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR AVARY SETTLEMENT H COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR KERR SETTLEMENT H COLEN & LEE AS AGENT FOR LIAR CLAIMS/MARCH 94 04928 705-300-0000-3401 00098 04/18/94 04928 705-400-1209-4201 00447 04/18/94 LIABILITY INS 04928 705-400-1209-4324 00470 04/18/94 LIABILITY INS 04928 705-400-1209-4324 00471 04/18/94 LIABILITY INS 04928 705-400-1209-4324 00472 04/18/94 LIABILITY INS . $18. ,4CR /INTEREST INCOME $6, 715. 50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $266.00 /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS , 5150. 00 /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS $6,736.25 /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H CREATIVE JUICES TYPESET SUMMER FLYER $13,649.21 04981 001-400-4601-4302 00236 $487.50 04/25/94 COMM RESOURCES /ADVERTISING *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H JIM*CUBBERLEY WINTER CLASS INSTRUCTOR •1 5487. 50 02971 001-400-4601-4221 00416 $162.00 04/18/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT REC CLASS/PROF? 013,62 47110 $0.00 04/25/94 08548 47122 $0.00 04/28/94 06547 47123 $0.00 04/28/94 08421 47109 $0.00 04/28/94 08421 47109 $0.00 04/28/94 08421 47109 $0.00 04/28/94 08421 47109 $0.00 04/28/94 08421 47109 $0.00 04/28/94 08555 47117 $0.00 04/28/94 08561 $0.00 47108 04/28/94 4 4 4 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07: 17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND # ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H D. I. A. I. R. TUITION/L. JAAKOLA 03629 001-400-2101-4312 04/25/94 POLICE PAGE 0002 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $162. 00 02283 $50. 00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H STEVE*ENDOM MEALS/STC CLASS 01034 001-400-2101-4313 05/02/94 POLICE $50. 00 00483 $84. 00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H CITY OF*HERMOSA BEACH WORK COMP CLAIMS/APR 94 $84. 00 04075 705-400-1217-4182 00365 $12,532.90 04/25/94 WORKERS COMP /WORKERS COMP CURRENT YR *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/4-1 TO 4-15-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 00243 001-202-0000-2030 00621 04/04/94 00243 001-202-0000-2030 04/20/94 00243 001-202-0000-2030 04/18/94 00243 105-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 00243 109-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 00243 110-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 00243 115-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 $12,532.90 $220,952.64 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00622 $7, 125. 50 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00623 $280,149.86 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00344 $9, 114. 12 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00143 $615.00 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00348 $39,412.77 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00202 $1,458.92 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00243 125-202-0000-2030 00061 04/04/94 $814.71 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 08154 $0. 00 08155 $0. 00 47116 04/28/94 47128 05/03/94 08423 47119 $0.00 04/28/94 46961 $0. 00 04/228/94 47113 $0. 00 04/28/94 47112 $0. 00 04/28/94 46961 $0. 00 04/2.8/94 46961 $0.00 04/28/94 46961 $0.00 04/28/94 46961 $0. 00 04/28/94 46961 $0.00 04/28/94 a FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 H HERMOSA BEACH PAYROLL ACCOUNT PAYROLL/3-16 TO 3-31-94 • *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00243 145-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 00243 146-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 00243 152-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 00243 155-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 00243 160-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 • 00243 170-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 00243 705-202-0000-2030 04/04/94 00340 •496 17 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00063 $1,931.79 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00026 $338. 69 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00341 $9,040.47 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00338 $11,663.43 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00195 $10,440.61 /ACCRUED PAYROLL 00302 $5, 144. 46 /ACCRUED PAYROLL H DET. LANCE*JAAKOLA MEALS/POST CLASS 02137 001-400-2101-4312 04/25/94 POLICE PAGE 0003 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $598,699.14 02282 $32. 00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H MALIBU CASTLE PARK COMM RES TRIP TICKETS $32. 00 02369 001-400-4601-4201 02243 $341.85 04/25/94 COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $341.85 H BRIAN AND ROSEMARY*O'MALLEY SETTLEMENT/O'MALLEY 05719 001-400-1131-4324 00001 $1,291.85 04/25/94 CITY ATTORNEY /CLAIMS/SETTLEMENTS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** OWNERSHIP LISTING.SERVICE 300' NOTICING;/4-7-94 $1,291.85 05107 001-400-4101-4304 00788 $225.00 04/25/94 PLANNING /TELEPHONE *0.00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 08153 $0. 00 46961 04/28/94 46961 04/28/94 46961 04/28/94 46961 04/28/94 46961 04/28/94 46961 04/28/94 46961 04/28/94 47115 04/28/94 08539 47125 $318.00 04/28/94 07847 47118 $0.00 04/28/94 01064 $0.00 47126 04/28/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION' *** VENDOR TOTAL H POSTMASTER P.O. BOX RENTAL/POLICE r•r 'H H H H H H H H H H H H VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0004 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO 0 CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $225.00 00097 001-400-2101-4305 02180 • $93.00 04/23/94 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT ADV/MAR 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENT/MARCH 94 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS. RETIREMENTMARCH 94 693.00 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00774 $89,237.61 04/11/94 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00775 390,640.21 04/21/94 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT 00026 001-400-1213-4180 00776 392,149.92CR 04/21/94 RETIREMENT /RETIREMENT 00026 105-400-2601-4180 00233 $1,369.36 04/21/94 STREET LIGHTING /RETIREMENT 00026 109-400-3301-4180 00098 $81.63 04/21/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/RETIREMENT 00026 110-400-1204-4180 00036 31,814.98 04/21/94 FINANCE CASHIER /RETIREMENT 00026 110-400-3302-4180 00240 32,495.04 04/21/94 PARKING ENF /RETIREMENT 00026 155-400-2102-4180 00203 $66.73 04'21/94 CROSSING GUARD /RETIREMENT 00026 160-400-3102-4180 00235 $1,123.08 04/21/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /RETIREMENT 00026 170-400-2103-4180 00101 $2,915.22 04/21/94 SPEC INVESTGTN6 /RETIREMENT 00026 705-400-1209-4180 00153 $269.89 04/21/94 LIABILITY INS /RETIREMENT 00026 705-400-1217-4180 00155 $346.21 04/21/94 . WORKERS COMP /RETIREMENT 08228 47121 $0.00 04/28/94 47035 30.00 04/28/94 47114 $0.00 04/28/94 47114 $0.00 04/28/94 47114 30. 00 04/28/94 47114 30. 00 04/28/94 47114 30. 00 04/28/94 47114 $0.00 04/28/94 47114 $0.00 04/28/94 47114 $0.00 04/28/94 47114 $0.00 04/28/94 47114 $0.00 04/28/94 47114 $0.00 04/28/94 11 z 14 „ I ,I 6„ 46'."A ! " FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ * ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL w***wa***awn******a****aw**a***a*n******w*****w*wn******w***w**a*nw* H RAMADA INN HOTEL/S. ENDOM 04472 001-400-2101-4313 05/02/94 POLICE PAGE 0005 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $98, 210. 04 00484 $145. 20 /TRAVEL EXPENSE, STC *** VENDOR TOTALwaw***w****************************n************a*****w***w*******w* * * * H RON*ROGERS SPRING CLASS REFUND VENDOR TOTAL $145. 20 05696 001-300-0000-3893 04481 $40.00 04/25/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES ******************w****a*a**w*****w*************a**a******w********* H SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY ANNUAL FILING FEE/93-94 $40. 00 04324 001-400-1203-4251 00166 $200.00 04/18/94 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT *** VENDOR TOTALw*****w*****w********w*a**w**awa***a***************a*********ww**a** H CITY OF*SOUTH GATE SEMINAR REG/J. WORKMAN H CITY OF*SOUTH GATE SEMINAR REG/V. COPELAND * * * S $200. 00 05711 001-400-1141-4316 00055 $20.00 04/18/94 CITY TREASURER /TRAIN'ING 05711 001-400-1202-4316 00488 $20.00 04/18/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** H LEWIS*STOKEM WORK GUARANTEE REFUND *** VENDOR TOTAL 05720 001-210-0000-2110 04/25/94 $40. 00 05684 $1,600.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE H JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/4-5 TO 4-19 H JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/4-5 TO 4-19 H JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/4-5 TO 4-19 $1,600.00 05125 001-400-1202-4305 00505 $3.78 04/25/94 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 05125 001-400-1202-4316 00489 $10.00 04/25/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TRAINING 05125 001-400-2101-4305 04/25/94 POLICE wadi �.yS �'i +R ZFO Yn.,P° •ai 1,,A N., r. .a... U r .a?. lis ,pjyar, aFi* .••-{' ,:,445 02181 $2.29 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 08156 $0. 00 47129 05/03/94 08546 47124 $0.00 04/28/94 08420 47107 $0.00 04/28/94 07846 47111 $0.00 04/28/94 07846 47111 $0. 00 04/28/94 08331 $0. 00 47120 04/28/94 08328 47127 $0.00 04/28/94 08328 47127 $0.00 04/28/94 08328 47127 $0.00 04/28/94 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION H JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/4-5 TO 4-19 H JOHN M. *WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/4-5 TO 4-19 H JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/4-5 TO 4-19 H JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/4-5 TO 4-19 H JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/4-5 TO 4-19 H JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/4-5 TO 4-19 H JOHN M.*WORKMAN, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/4-5 TO 4-19 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 PAGE 0006 DATE 05/04/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4* CHK 4k DATE INVC PROJ 4 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 05125 001-400-2201-4305 00673 526.81 04/25/94 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 03125 001-400-2201-4309 01606 8103.62 04/25/94 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 05125 001-400-4101-4305 00729 $25.75 04/25/94 PLANNING /OFFICE OPER'SUPPLIES 05125 001-400-4201-4305 00935 85.36 04/25/94 BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 05125 001-400-4201-4316 00337 812.00 04/25/94 BUILDING /TRAINING 05125 110-400-1204-4305 00094 52.08 04/25/94 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 05125 160-400-3102-4309 00888 515.07 04/25/94 - SEWER/ST DRAIN /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 8206.76 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** 8728,900.45 R A & B TIRE - 2000 REPAIR BACKHOE TIRE 05722 160-400-3102-4311 00258 851.50 24625 04/11/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 851.50 R ADVANCED ELECTRONICS RADIO REPAIR/APR 94 00935 110-400-3302-4309 00930 852.07 14557 04/20/94 PARKING ENF /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 852.07 R ALITTA BEACH PATROL UNIFORMS 05690 001-400-2101-4187 9616 04/06/94 POLICE 00607 891.30 /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R ALPHA OMEGA BUILDERS FINAL RETENTION PAYMENT 891. 30 03591 109-400-8148-4201 00010 83,557.50 04/28/94 CIP 89-148 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 08328 47127 80.00 04/28/94 08328 47127 80.00 04/28/94 08328 47127 80. 00 04/28/94 08328 47127 80.00 04/28/94 08328 47127 80. 00 04/28/94 08328 47127 80.00 04/28/94 08328 47127 50.00 04/28/94 24625 00864 80. 00 14557 01084 47133 05/03/94 47134 50.00 05/03/94 9616 08220 886. 60 47135 05/03/94 08658 47136 50.00 05/03/94 11 • ri • i i FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 07: 17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL R AMERICAN STYLE FOODS PRISONER MEALS/APRIL 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PAGE 0007 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $3,557.50 00857 001-400-2101-4306 01528 $71.75 8380 04/12/94 POLICE /PRISONER MAINTENANCE R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED UTILITY RAG/RUGS—MAR 94 R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED UTILITY RAG/RUGS—MAR 94 R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED UTILITY RAG/RUGS—MAR 94 R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED UTILITY RAG/RUGS—MAR 94 R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED UTILITY RAG/RUGS—MAR 94 R ARATEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED UTILITY RAG/RUGS—MAR 94 $71.75 00152 001-400-2101-4309 00706 $86.48 03/31/94 POLICE 00152 001-400-2201-4309 01609 03/31/94 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $64.40 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00152 001-400-3104-4309 01164 $10.40 03/31/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00152 001-400-4204-4309 02830 $221.51 03/31/94 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00152 001-400-4205-4309 00790 $37.00 03/31/94 EQUIP SERVICE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00152 110-400-3302-4309 00949 $5.12 - 03/31/94 ---'•- PARKINO-ENF. -• -— /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL********************************************************Fir********** R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 • R BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 $424.91 01308 001-400-1212-4188 03004 $56.36 -04/28/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01308 110-400-1204-4188 00271 $1.04 04/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • R STATE*BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SALES TAX TAPES/NOV—MAR 01715 • a *** VENDOR TOTAL R******************************************************************* $57.40 02411 001-400-1207-4251 00056 $54.13 04/28/94 BUS LICENSE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GQVT • R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES • 0 i TRASH PICKUP/APRIL 94 ct_�r�.i'fw .Ev�rva'•— $54.13 00155 001-400-1208-4201 01119 $635.64 04/01/94 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT �9 tliASCA• ' 8380 00105 00.00 47137 05/03/94 00017 47138 $0.00 05/03/94 00017 47138 $0.00 05/03/94 00017 47138 $0.00 05/03/94 00017 47138 $0.00 05/03/94 00017 47138 $0.00 05/03/94 00017 47138 $0.00 05/03/94 00055 47139 $0.00 05/03/94 00055 47139 $0.00 05/03/94 101715 00079 $0.00 MAW:. Cf7:. 47140 04/28/94 00005 47141 $0.00 05/03/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R BROWNING & FERRIS INDUSTRIES TRASH PICKUP/APRIL 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL * * * CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 PAGE 0008 DATE 05/04/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK M DATE INVC PROJ $ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DA1E EXP 00155 109-400-3301-4201 00246 $375 17 04/01/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $1.010. 81 R BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES 00158 001-400-3103-4201 00531 •4,111.41 DUMP CHARGES/MARCH 94 VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** 03/31/94 ST MAINTENANCE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT R BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLY RECEIPT BOOKS/STOCK. 03699 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,061.91 $4,111.41 00034 001-400-1208-4305 01366 $1,061.91 03/28/94 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTHIPLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN , CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R CA PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 00238 001-400-1212-4188 02997 $824.10 04/28/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 105-400-2601-4188 01628 $36.81 04/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 109-400-3301-4188 00530 $1.44 04/28/94 DNTN ENHANC-COMM/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- 00238 110-400-1204-4188 00264 $49.18 04/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 110-400-3302-4188 01898 $85.57 04/28/94 ..-. - - -PARKING ENF --. /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 160-400-3102-4188 01610 $26.75 04/28/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 705-400-1209-4188 00857 $4.78 04/28/94 LIABILITY INS . /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00238 705-400-1217-4188 00964 $7.17 04/28/94 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *4* VENDOR TOTAL***u**************************************************************** R THE*CALIF PARK & REC. SOCIETY ANNUAL DUES/L. NEWSOM $1,035.80 00602 001-400-4601-4315 00144 $110.00 04/20/94 COMM RESOURCES /MEMBERSHIP 00005 47141 60.00 05/03/94 00004 47142 $0.00 05/03/94 203699 08315 47143 $992.44 05/03/94 00041 47144 30.00 05/03/94 00041 47144 $0.00 05/03/94 00041 47144 $0.00 05/03/94 00041 47144 $0.00 05/03/94 00041 47144 $0.00 05/03/94 00041 47144 $0.00 05/03/94 00041 47144 $0.00 05/03/94 00041 47144 $0.00 05/03/94 08560 47145 $0.00 05/03/94 • • • • • • 10 „ U 14 r' oilf: •' • V ,.I • • r • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 .PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0009 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN p AMOUNT INV/REF PO 11 CHK 4* DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL*********************************************grit**************air***** $110.00 • R CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 03162 001-400-2201-4305 00674 $91.80 8176288 06298 47146 'W HAZ-MAT PUBLICATIONS 76288 04/14/94 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $80.00 05/03/94 IP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $91.80 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-3101-4303 00331 $763.87 01011 47147 0 WATER BILLS/APRIL 94 04/19/94 MEDIANS /UTILITIES $0.00 05/03/94 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-4204-4303 00770 $472.10 01011 47147 WATER BILLS/APRIL 94 04/19/94 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES $0.00 05/03/94 R CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 00016 001-400-6101-4303 00576 $2,426.12 01011 47147 WATER BILLS/APRIL 94 04/19/94 PARKS /UTILITIES $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R CARE STATION HEPATITIS B SHOT/BALVIN 417-0 • $3,662.09 03972 001-400-1203-4320 00509 $45.00 24417-0 01092 47148 04/04/94 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $45.00 40 R JEANNE*CARUSO 03293 001-400-2101-4312 02284 4, 40 40 MEALS/MILES-POST CLASS R JEANNE*CARUSO REIMB MATERIAL/WINTER 94 04/20/94 POLICE $41.94 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 08152 47149 $0.00 05/03/94 03293 001-400-2101-4316 01110 $24.37 08224 47149 04/20/94 POLICE /TRAINING $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $66.31 R CHEVRON USA, INC. 00634 001-400-2201-4310 00203 $52.76 7898192088 01015 47150 40 GASOLINE/FIRE/MARCH 94 92088 04/06/94 FIRE /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $52.76 R CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 001-400-4202-4187 00260 $543.65 00002 47151 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 94 03/31/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $0.00 05/03/94 a„te r ,h ‘4•V* v. FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 CITY OF HERMOSA [BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0010 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME , VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF PO N CHK N DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R CINTAS CORPORATION 00153 110-400-3302-4187 00470 $26.25 00002 47151 UNIFORM RENTAL/MARCH 94 03/31/94 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $569.90 R STEPHANIE*CLAYTON 05724 001-210-0000-2110 05687 $50.00 72562 08330 47152 ANIMAL' TRAP REFUND 72562 04/20/94 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/03/94 R STEPHANIE*CLAYTON 03724 001-300-0000-3895 00169 $23.70CR 72562 08330 47152 ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 72562 04/20/94 /ANIMAL TRAP FEE $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $26.30 • R COLEN AND LEE 04715 705-400-1209-4201 00448 $1,470.00 00042 47153 LIAB ADMIN/MAV 94 04/28/94 LIABILITY INS /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $1,470.00 R COM SYSTEMS, INC DISCOUNT OFFERED R COM SYSTEMS, INC DISCOUNT TAKEN R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 ' R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 00017 001-202-0000-2021 00628 $97.89 01017 47155 04/28/94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 04/28/94 00017 001-202-0000-2022 00621 $97.89CR 01017 47155 04/28/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 04/28/94 00017 001-400-1121-4304 00711 $4.50 01017 47155 04/28/94 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE $0.00 04/28/94 0001,7 001-400-1131-4304 00537 $3.41 - • 04/28/94 - - ---- • - - ---CITY ATTORNEY---. /TELEPHONE- - 01017 47155 $0.00 04/28/94 00017 001-400-1141-4304 00728 $0.99 01017 47155 04/28/94 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE $0.00 04/28/94 00017 001-400-1201-4304 00788 $22.88 04/28/94 - ---- -- - - -CITY-MANAGER----/TELEPHONE 01017 CITY-MANAGER---.--..-/TEL-EPHONE- 01017 47155 $0.00 04/28/94 00017 001-400-1202-4304 00784 $34.56 01017 47155 04/28/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE $0.00 04/28/94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC 00017 001-400-1203-4304 00796 $34.48 01017 47155 LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 - 04/28/94-- -----PERSONNEL-------/TELEPHONE - $0.00 04/28/94 r 11 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 .PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION • 40 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 R COM SYSTEMS, INC LONG DISTANCE/MARCH 94 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00017 001-400-1206-4304 00721 $63.79 04/28/94 • -.. • DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE - 00017 001-400-1207-4304 00587 320.83 04/28/94 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-2101-4304 04/28/94 POLICE 01412 3411.21 /TELEPHONE • 00017 001-400-4101-4304 00789 332.02 04/28/94 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4201-4304 00709 341.39 04/28/94 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4202-4304 00856 $81.19 04/28/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00017 001-400-4601-4304 00903 $74.09 04/28/94 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE 00017 105-400-2601-4304 00259 $2.41 04/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /TELEPHONE 00017 110-400-1204-4304 00105 $11.03 04/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE 00017 110-400-3302-4304 00802 $6.72 04/28/94 PARKING ENF /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES MAINT II PROMO EXAM 352 PAGE 0011 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO * CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $845.50 03674 001-400-1203-4201 01202 $269.60 03/31/94 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT • *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** • • • • • R DAL -TILE FLOOR TILE/FIRE REMODEL 72577 $269.60 05691 001-400-2201-4309 01610 $1,223.66 04/06/94 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DANIEL FREEMAN MEMORIAL HOSP. PHYSICAL/S. OSEKOWSKY -0017 $1,223.66 01017 47155 50. 00 04/28/94 01017 47155 $0.00 04/28/94 01017 47155 $0.00 04/28/94 01017 47155 $0.00 04/28/94 01017 47155 $0.00 04/28/94 01017 47155 $0.00 04/28/94 01017 47155 30.00 04/28/94 01017 47155 $0.00 04/28/94 01017 47155 $0.00 04/28/94 01017 47155 $0.00 04/28/94 352 08406 $269.60 72577 06296 $1,223.66 47156 05/03/94 47157 05/03/94 00047 001-400-1203-4320 00510 $400.00 80000162-0017 01089 47158 04/07/94 PERSONNEL /PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS $0.00 05/03/94 :.t e.. f,. r hD..... ,, 4 . 'r e FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 . PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 PAGE 0012 DATE 05/04/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4k CHK M DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R DEL AMO MOTORS MOTORCYCLE TIRES R DEL AMO MOTORS MOTORCYCLE SERV/APR 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00303 001-400-2101-4311 07021 04/04/94 POLICE $400.00 01838 3314. 55 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 00303 001-400-2101-4311 01841 07022 04/04/94 POLICE 8257. 49 /AUTO MAINTENANCE R DELAY'S PRINTING DISCOUNT OFFERED R DELAY'S PRINTING DISCOUNT TAKEN * * * R DELAY'S PRINTING BUS LIC INQUIRY FORMS VENDOR TOTAL 01847 001-202-0000-2021 00629 - 03/21/94 01847 001-202-0000-2022 00622 03/21/94 01847 001-400-1207-4305 00332 03/21/94------- - BUS LICENSE .-- $572.04 $13.50 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $13. 50CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $131.52 /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $131.52 93007021 08218 47159 $314.65 04/26/94 93007022 01086 $0.00 R DENN ENGINEERS 05094 115-400-8178-4201 00003 $6,000.00 - ----ENG-SERV/MED MONUMENTS ----4242----- -04/07/94--- --- —6 TR -MONUMENTS/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE - e** VENDOR TOTAL R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE & SHELTER COSTS/MARCH 94 www VENDOR TOTAL $6,000.00 00154 001-400-2401-4251 00242 $259.38 04/10/94 --------------ANIMAL -CONTROL--.--/CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT R THE *DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPING/MARCH 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL 00147 001-400-2101-4306 --03/31/94 - POLICE $259.38 01529 $82.48 ----,---/PRISONER-MAINTENANCE- $82.48 ---- - •/PRISONER -MAINTENANCE - R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION COMP SYS MAINT/APR 94 30894 $82.48 47159 05/03/94 04374 47160 $0.00 05/03/94 04374 47160 $0.00 05/03/94 04374 47160 $186.19 05/03/94 4242 08605 47161 -$6.000.00 05/03/94 00014 47162 $0.00 05/03/94 01020 • $0. 00 47163 05/03/94 00269 001-400-2101-4201 01488 $182.51 345530894 00007 47164 04/15/94 ---- POLICE- • • /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 r 0 0 0 (1 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07: 17:37 ,PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION COMP SYS MAINT/APR 94 30894 w*w VENDOR TOTAL .0 12 13 tr • � b *w* CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 00269 001-400-2201-4201 04/15/94 FIRE PAGE 0013 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO M CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00471 *121.68 347730894 00007 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 R DIVERSIFIED PHOTO SUPPLY FILM/P.W. ADMIN/MAR 94 98377, VENDOR TOTAL *304. 19 04394 001-400-4202-4305 00860 *145.87 03/24/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES DENISE*DOLEY TOWING FEE REFUND R DENISE*DOLEY TOWING FEE REFUND 05726 001-300-0000-3841 04/20/94 *145. 87 00759 $38.00 /POLICE TOWING 05726 110-400-3302-4201 00438 $65.00 04/20/94 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R VIRGINIA*EATON ANIMAL TRAP REFUND R VIRGINIA*EATON ANIMAL TRAP USE FEES 05725 001-210-0000-2110 05686 79705 04/20/94 05725 001-300-0000-3895 79705 04/20/94 $103.00 $50.00 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE 00168 $6. 70CR /ANIMAL TRAP FEE *** VENDOR TOTAL**w**************************************************************www *0* R VIRGINIA*ELLEDGE MEALS/CLEARS CONFERENCE TR420 R VIRGINIA*ELLEDGE CAR RENTAL/CLEARS CONF VENDOR TOTAL 03858, 001-400-2101-4316 04/28/94 POLICE 03858 001-400-2101-4316 TR420 04/28/94 POLICE 01111 *43. 30 $36.00 /TRAINING 01112 $85.78 /TRAINING ******************************************************************** R EMS MEDICAL SERVICES SUCTION UNIT/AMBULANCE 03033 ***1 VENDOR TOTAL 03908 001-400-2201-5402 00072 03/10/94 FIRE $121.78 $551.77 /EQUIP -MORE THAN $500 * * * ** * * * **.*** **** *********** ********* ** * ****** ****** ***** * **** ****** R FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 5551. 77 04963 001-400-1212-4188 03000 $8.796.91 04/28/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 098377 01022 *0. 00 47164 05/03/94 47165 04/28/94 08225 47166 $0.00 05/03/94 08225 47166 $0.00 05/03/94 79705 OB329 47167 $0.00 05/03/94 79705 08329 47167 $0.00 05/03/94 TR420 00420 47168 $0.00 05/03/94 TR420 00420 $0.00 403033 06229 $536.38 47168 05/03/94 47169 05/03/94 00056 47170 $0.00 05/03/94 FINANCE-SFA340 ® TIME 07:17:37 r PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R FOUNDATION --CITY HEALTH R FOUNDATION CITY HEALTH R FOUNDATION CITY HEALTH R FOUNDATION CITY HEALTH R FOUNDATION ----- ,-- CITY HEALTH R FOUNDATION CITY, HEALTH R FOUNDATION --.- -- CITY HEALTH •*e VENDOR TOTAL HEALTH PLAN INS/MAY 94 HEALTH PLAN INS/MAY 94 HEALTH PLAN INS/MAY 94 HEALTH PLAN INS/MAY 94 HEALTH PLAN INS/MAY 94 HEALTH PLAN INS/MAY 94 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PACE 0014 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO 0 CHK 0 DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 04963 107-400-2601-4188 01631 $120.24 04/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 109-400-3301-4188 00531 $30.06 04/28/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 110-400-1204-4188 00267 $400.75 - 04/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 110-400-3302-4188 01901 $200.35 04/28/94 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 160-400-3102-4188 01613 $170.32 -- 04/28/9 - -SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 04963 170-400-2103-4188 00558 $349.66 04/28/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS HEALTH PLAN 04963 .INS/MAY 94- .. ..04/28/94 - 705-400-1217-4188 00966 $100.19 ---WORKERS-COMP--- /EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS $10, 168. 48 • R FRANKSONS, INC. 00010 110-400-3302-4311 00951 $38.16 -CUSHMAN MANIFOLD--.-------- 12940------02/17/94--..-----'-------._....-----PARKING--ENF..-----. ----- /AUTO MAINTENANCE------ •** VENDOR TOTAL R FRY'S ELECTRONICS .NETWORK CABLES/SWITCHES .22509 •e* VENDOR TOTAL $38. 16 05314 001-400-1206-4305 00678 $142.76 ------04/011/94-------.---.---- ----DATA-PROCESSING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES R GARTH*GAINES MEALS/P. O. S. T. CLASS •** VENDOR TOTAL $142. 76 02822 001-400-2101-4312 02291 $40.00 04/28/94 ..-. POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE . POST ,R GAMETIME PLAYGROUND EGUIP PARTS $40. 00 01318 001-400-6101-4309 01529 $271.71 52884 03/23/94 PARKS /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS I ..,., ,- yrC./gmar1� t;�^f ;vrf�ri.r •.:r « 00056 47170 $0.00 05/03/94 00076 47170 $0.00 05/03/94 00056 47170 $0. 00 05/03/94 00056 47170 $0.00 05/03/94 00056 47170 $0.00 05/03/94 00056 47170 $0.00 05/03/94 00056 47170 $0.00 05/03/94 12940 08217 47171 - $38. 18 05/03/94 922509 04087 *142.76 08147 $0.00 552884 08601 $271. 70 47172 05/03/94 47173 05/03/94 47174 05/03/94 .. l;."f. .i;., .: ic^57..:r.•.:R� C;.. .ay.41,13.613:,4044'..fiiic!'fiK IaGNZ��ew'y: FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 • • • • • • • • 5-1 55 41 51 ,PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0015 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 8 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R R V R R R R R R R R R R R GEORGE & AL'S AUTO TOP SHOP REPAIR SHOP VAN SEATS 2842 GEORGE & AL'S AUTO TOP SHOP REBUILD TRUCK SEAT 2834 INV/REF PO M CHK N AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $271.71 01748 001-400-4205-4311 00334 3378.88 04/18/94 EQUIP SERVICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01748 105-400-2601-4311 00353 $216.50 04/07/94 STREET LIGHTING /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** ENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 GTE CALIFORNIA. INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED PHONE CHARGES/APRIL 94 3595. 38 00015 001-400-1101-4304 00635 36.73 04/28/94 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1121-4304 00712 320.06 04/28/94 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1131-4304 00538 38.03 04/28/94 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1132-4304 00034 38.03 04/28/94 CITY PROSECUTOR /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1141-4304 00729 315.99 04/28/94 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1201-4304 00789 $14.76 04/28/94 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1202-4304 00785 $59.95 04/28/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1203-4304 00797 $44.39 04/28/94 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1206-4304 00722 3141.21 04/20/94 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1207-4304 00588 $17.47 04/28/94 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-1208-4304 00348 $8.40 04/28/94 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE 2642 08632 3378. 88 2834 08620 3216. 50 01030 30. 00 01030 30. 00 01030 30. 00 01030 $0.00 01030 $0.00 01030 30. 00 01030 $0.00 01030 $0.00 01030 30. 00 01030 $0.00 01030 $0.00 47175 05/03/94 47175 05/03/94 47177 04/28/94 47177 04/28/94 47177 04/28/94 47177 04/28/94 47177 04/28/94 47177 04/28/94 47177 04/28/94 47177 04/28/94 47177 04/28/94 47177 04/28/94 47177 04/28/94 FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 41 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTE CALIFORNIA, PHONE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, PHONE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, PHONE... CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA. PHONE CHARGES/APR 23 24 2•, • R GTE CALIFORNIA, PHONF CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA. PHONE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, PHONE CHARGES/APR GTE CALIFORNIA, PHONE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, PHONE CHARGES/APR -R GTE CALIFORNIA, PHONE CHARGES/APR R GTE CALIFORNIA, PHONE CHARGES/APR *sr VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 PAGE 0016 DATE 05/04/94 VND $ ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO 4 CHK * DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP INCORPORATED 00015 IL _ 94_.___------------04/28/94- INCORPORATED 001-400-2101-4304 01413 4758.55 00015 001-400-2201-4304 00600 •74.17 IL 94 -. 04/28/94 -- - - - - - FIRE INCORPORATED IL .94 .--- -...-- - INCORPORATED /TELEPHONE 00015 001-400-2401-4304 00599 410.99 ___.04/28/94_ ANIMAL . CONTROL --- /TELEPHONE- 00015 001-400-4101-4304 00790 $64.39 IL- 94 04/28/94 -. -PLANNING- -- -- ---- /TELEPHONE INCORPORATED 00015 IL -.94------.--- 04128/94 INCORPORATED 001-400-4201-4304 00710 ---------BU ILD I NG --•- $109. 68 /TELEPHONE - ---------- --------- 00015 001-400-4202-4304 00857 $182.25 IL 94 ...04/28/94 ---- -- -- PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE - INCORPORATED IL__9.4 _ INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-4204-4321 00773 $33.60 01030 47177 -40:-00---04/28/94-- 01030 -$0:-00------04/28/94 01030 $0.00 47177 04/28/94 01030 47177 -40.00 04/28/94 01030 47177 $0:00 04/28/94 01030 47177 —40,00 - 04/28/94- 01030 47177 $0:00 04/28/94 01030 47177 -04/28/94 --_-$0:-00. 04/28/94-- GTE 4/28/94----- 00015 001-400-4601-4304 00904 $95.48 IL 94 04/28/94 - COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE INCORPORATED 00015 001-400-6101-4304 00568 $8.03 IL .94 - 04/28/94_,.- ._ - - .PARKS.. ._ _ ..-_._.. /TELEPHONE INCORPORATED 00015 110-400-1204-4304 00106 $88.37 IL 94 04/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE INCORPORATED IL 94__... _.... _..... ..--.----. 00015 110-400-3302-4304 00803 $72.15 04/28/.94----.._...__...._...__...---_..-P--ARKING..ENF....__._ /TELEPHONE R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY $1,842.68 01340 001-400-1101-4304 00636 $10.85 04/28/94 CITY COUNCIL /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1121-4304 00713 429.45 04/28/94 CITY CLERK /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1131-4304 00339 415.50 04/28/94 CITY ATTORNEY /TELEPHONE 01030 47177 $0.00 04/28/94 01030 47177 $0.00 04/28/94 01030 47177 $0.00 04/28/94 01030 47177 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 40.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 •1 • • • • • 9 • r • M1Y !i) FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 . PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FED-MAY GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FES-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY R GTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY OTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB-MAY CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01340 001-400-1132-4304 00037 $15.50 04/28/94 CITY PROSECUTOR /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1141-4304 00730 329.47 04/28/94 CITY TREASURER /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1201-4304 00790 326.35 04/28/94 CITY MANAGER /TELEPHONE • 01340 001-400-1202-4304 00786 $100.74 04/28/94 FINANCE ADMIN /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1203-4304 00798 $37.19 04/28/94 PERSONNEL /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1206-4304 00723 $44.94 04/28/94 DATA PROCESSING /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1207-4304 00589 $29.45 04/28/94 BUS LICENSE /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-1208-4304 00349 $15.50 04/28/94 GEN APPROP /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-2101-4304 01414 $581.15 04/28/94 POLICE • /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-2201-4304 00601 $15.50 04/28/94 FIRE /TELEPHONE 01340, 001-400-2401-4304 00600 $15.50 -04/28/94- • ----ANIMAL-CONTROL /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4101-4304 00791 $74.38 04/28/94 PLANNING /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4201-4304 00711 $133.28 04/28/94 BUILDING /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4202-4304 00858 $148.78 04/28/94 PUB WKS ADMIN /TELEPHONE 01340 001-400-4601-4304 00905 $44.94 04/28/94 COMM RESOURCES /TELEPHONE PAGE 0017 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00067 47179 10.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 • • n 0 12 • FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R GTEL PHONE.SYS MAINT/FEB—MAY R OTEL PHONE SYS MAINT/FEB—MAY R GTEL PHONE.SYS MAINT/F.EB—MAY.-_.. •** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 01340 001-400-6101-4304 04/28/94 --- - - -- -- -•-- —PARKS 00369 $15.50 - /TELEPHONE 01340 110-400-1204-4304 00107 *91.44 04/28/94 • FINANCE CASHIER /TELEPHONE 01340 110-400-3302-4304 00804 $74.38 ENF----- - /TELEPHONE R GUARDIAN DENTAL _ 1__CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 -.-- R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY.94---- R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAV 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R GUARDIAN DENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL ** PAGE 0018 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO M CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $1,549.77 02623 001-400-1212-4188 03002 $3,025.73 ---04/28 /94 -- 02623 04/28/94 02623 04/28/94 02623 04/28/94 -. --.--.-------EMP--BENEFITS ---- -- /EMPLOYEE -BENEFITS ---- 105-400-2601-4188 01633 $21.29 - STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 109-400-3301-4188 00532 $3.95 --------DNTN-ENHANC••COMM/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS-- - ---- 110-400-1204-4188 - - -- 110-400-1204-4188 00269 $122.07 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 02623 110-400-3302-4188 01903 $23.54 - 04/28/94 02623 04/28/94- 02623 04/28/94 02623 04/28/94 02623 04/28/94 02623 04/28/94 -- --- PARKING ENF--- /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 155-400-2102-4188 01009 $5.65 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 160-400-3102-4188 01615 $29.31 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 170-400-2103-4188 00560 $41.42 SPEC INVESTOTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 705-400-1209-4188 00860 $33.52 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 705-400-1217-4188 00968 $50.28 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS #**************************************************************** R HAINES AND COMPANY CRISS CROSS DIRECTORIES 36777 E' rt eg n s .f r y ; • 1$ $3,356.76 00067 47179 00.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 $0.00 04/28/94 00067 47179 00.00 04/28/94 00001 47180 -- -- $O: 00 - 05/03/94 00001 47180 30.00 05/03/94 00001 47180 30:00 05/03/94 00001 47180 $0.00 05/03/94 00001 47180 $0.00 05/03/94 00001 47180 $0.00 05/03/94 00001 47180 $0.00 05/03/94 00001 47180 $0.00 05/03/94 00001 47180 $0.00 05/03/94 00001 47180 $0.00 05/03/94 00878 001-400-2101-4305 02182 $669.32 36960/36777 08202 47181 04/05/94 POLICE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $669.31 05/03/94 bC atv,°eYr�:� 1i✓ 1�':`i y�i34k .�..1;�'ar �i+`i�i''wr N. - I. kga - as5,', zt,.wa::t;3.•?,eY:k» aisx..;„t S.:>a v�',� a^6 i.w�>a^ T a t to ,50 1 .. z.T v CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PACE 0019 O TIME 07:17:37 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK M O DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROD 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL *660.32 O R HEALTHNET 00241 001-400-1212-4188 03001 118.826.46 00016 47182 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10.00 05/03/94 • R HEALTHNET 00241 105-400-2601-4188 01632 1973.14 00016 47182 , CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10.00 05/03/94 • R HEALTHNET 00241 110-400-1204-4188 00268 1748.18 00016 47182 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10.00 05/03/94 O R HEALTHNET 00241 110-400-3302-4188 01902 11.464.98 00016 47182 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10.00 05/03/94 O R HEALTHNET 00241 155-400-2102-4188 01008 125.09 00016 47182 CITY.HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10.00 05/03/94 j..,, R HEALTHNET 00241 160-400-3102-4188 01614 1508.24 00016 47182 • CITY HEALTH -INS/MAY 94 -- -----_.... _.___._-04/28/94--_ SEWER/ST-DRAIN- /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --- 10.00 05/03/94 ,1,•..i R HEALTHNET 00241 170-400-2103-4188 00559 1145.28 00016 47182 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10.00 05/03/94 �I1;I 141 • 4, AO •S • • R HEALTHNET - -.--.CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 • *R HEALTHNET CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 00241 705-400-1209-4188 00859 $176.94 00016 47182 04/28/94----------- - LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS --.. $0.00 05/03/94 00241 705-400-1217-4188 00967 $176.94 00016 47182 04/28/94 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS • 10.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL*********000***********************************ire►******************* $23,045.25 I. ' R HERMOSA BCH CITY SCHOOL DIST. 02066 001-400-6101-4251 00037 1500.00 00074 47183 04/28/94 • PARKS /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT 04/28/94 FIELD USE/MAINT-MAY 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL 1500. 00 10. 00 R HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC. 03131 001-400-1202-4201 00391 $900.00 1020 00054 47184 GALES TAX SERV/JAN-MAR94 1020 04/16/94 FINANCE ADMIN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** __•- $900.00 R INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP, INC. 03254 001-400-2101-4201 01489 $457.80 308834-0494 00077 47185 DISPATCH SYS MAINT/APR -0494 04/01/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 10.00 05/03/94 aer,1 ,1 • ": — FINANCE-8FA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R INFINITE COMPUTER GROUP, INC. DISPATCH SYS MAINT/APR —0494 *** VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 03/03/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 05254 001-400-2201-4201 04/01/94 FIRE PAGE 0020 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO 0 CHK M AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00472 $305.20 308834-0494 00077 47183 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT OFFERED .. R' INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC DISCOUNT TAKEN INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC ELECTRIC SUPP/APR94 R INGLEWOOD WHOLESALE ELECTRIC MISC,ELECTRIC SUPP/APR94 02438 001-202-0000-2021 00626 04/28/94 - - - -- - - 02458 001-202-0000-2022 04/28/94 0763.00 $9.73 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 00619 $9. 75CR /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 02438 001-400-4204-4309 02828 $233.92 04/28/94 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 02438 103-400-2601-4309 01001 $244.65 04/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL*****************************ir***********• *-irir********tr*************•x R L.A. TRONICS VIDEO CASSETTE PLAYER 02088 001-400-2701-5401 00015 02870 03/24/94 CIVIL DEFENSE $478.57 $140.69 /EQUIP—LESS THAN $500 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. PARKS MAINT/MARCH 94 R LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. CONTRACT INC/JUL—MAR 04303 001-400-6101-4201 03/31/94 PARKS 04303, 001-400-6101-4201 03/31/94 PARKS $140.69 00360 $8,585.50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT 00361 $4, 567. 50 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT TUITION/G. GAINES 00718 001-400-2101-4312 04/06/94 POLICE $13, 153. 00 02290 $100.00 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** ,R EILEEN*MADDEN • MILES/P.O.S. T CLASS 03273 001-400-2101-4312 02286 04/20/94 POLICE $100. 00 $137.28 /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 01037 47186 $0.00 04/28/94 01037 47186 $0.00 04/28/94 01037 47186 $0.00 04/28/94 01037 47186 $0.00 04/28/94 3602870 06238 $140.69 47187 05/03/94 00073 47188 $0.00 04/28/94 00073 47188 $0.00 04/28/94 08148 $0.00 08150 $0.00 47189 05/03/94 47190 05/03/94 'Y�.•: xr x A.,. rc' _,yi_ ..v..,�.1.,..-J, :.,xa. .?.•.,., ., .fa. ._w,f,; .�, ti iw.a it �. � yf �. t� i. t. , �f: r.. ..n �-'.iv d..� a"e., .�t ? at CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE-SFA340 DEMAND LIST PAGE 0021 W TIME 07:17:37 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN * AMOUNT INV/REF PO # CHK 3 ✓ DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP W *** VENDOR TOTAL *****tr*•sf***tr*•outer****•n****•n**tr•a******•n*tr***********tr****trtr•n•n******** $137.26 O R MANTEK 01943 105-400-2601-4309 01003 $138.51 30-66718 08602 47191 LOCK LUBRICANT 66718 03/29/94 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $138.48 05/03/94 O *** VENDOR TOTAL***********************************************aril******************* $438.51 R KENNETH A.*MEERSAND 04138 001-400-1132-4201 00165 $6,200.00 08227 47192 LEGAL SERV/MARCH 1994 04/11/94 CTY PROSECUTOR /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $6,200.00 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. 03080 001-141-0000-1401 00269 $3,066.68 940478 08629 47193 UNLEADED GAS/CITY YARD 40478 04/04/94 /GASOLINE INVENTORY $0.00 05/03/94 R MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. 03080 001-400-4205-4310 00290 $214.34 940535 08640 47193 TRANSMISSION FLUID/YARD 40535 04/12/94 EQUIP SERVICE /MOTOR FUELS. AND LUBES $204.81 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $3,281.02 R BARBARA*MEYERS 05723 001-300-0000-3893 04482 $96.00 75355 08557 47194 SPRING CLASS REFUND 75335 - 04/20/94 /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL • 1, R MS RUTH*MILLER --_._-------..MILES/P. 0. S. T. CLASS SC" *** VENDOR TOTAL • • 91 92 .11 $96.00 02727 001-400-2101-4312 02285 $229.06 08151 47195 . 140 —04/20/94 -• --_ ..._.._.... _.... .POLICE -_- _ -.. /TRAVEL EXPENSE.-. .POST . • $0.00 05/03/94 $229.06 R MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORPORATION 00388 170-400-2103-4310 00149 $15.63 8839307843 01050 47196 GASOLINE .PURCHASES/APR - _--07843----—04/-1-1/94----------•SPEC--I-NVE8TOTNS-/MOTOR-FUELS-AND--LUBES _. .._.. _._.._....._._.__._40:-00----- 05/03/94 -- *** VENDOR TOTAL $15.63 R MOORE BUSINESS PRODUCTS 04402 001-400-2101-4305 02183 $460.28 20760808 08219 47197 COMPUTER PAPER/DISPATCH-60808.- .--.-04/08/94 -- PGL ICE /OFFICE -OPER SUPPLIES---.--- .. 3460.45 05/03/94 a • glb FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0022 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK M DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS PAINT THINNER/50 GALLON 7421 R MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS WHITE STREET PAINT : 7478 $460.28 00251 001-400-3104-4309 01166 $297.69 03/31/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 00251 001-400-3104-4309 01167 $595.38 04/08/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE 'MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R MYERS STEVENS & COMPANY CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 $893.07 00091 001-400-1212-4188 02996 $162.00 04/28/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $162.00 R OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPP/FINANCE/MAR R OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPP/STOCK/MAR 94 R OFFICE DEPOT 2 DWR CABINET/PUB WORKS 48927 R OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPP/COMM RES/MAR R OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPP/CASHIER/MAR 04142 001-400-1202-4305 00506 $10.80 03/31/94 FINANCE ADMIN /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 04142 001-400-1208-4305 01365 $820.50 03/31/94 GEN APPROP /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 7421 08612 47198 $297.68 05/03/94 7478 08634 47198 $595.38 05/03/94 00013 47199 $0.00 05/03/94 01085 47200 $0.00 05/03/94 01085 47200 $0.00 05/03/94 04142 001-400-4202-5401 00067 $108.24 848927 08080 47200 03/09/94 PUB WKS ADMIN/EQUIPMENT-LESS THAN $500 $108.24 05/03/94 04142 001-400-4601-4305 01239 $48.67 03/31/94 COMM RESOURCES /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES 04142 110-400-1204-4305 00095 $68.01 03/31/94 FINANCE CASHIER /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPUTER HOOKUPS/APR 94 00321 001-400-2101-4304 04/15/94 POLICE $1,056.22 01415 $145.20 /TELEPHONE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R PAK WEST JANITORIAL SUPP/APR 94 00519 001-400-4204-4309 02829 $145.20 $213.48 21227 04/28/94 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 04142 47200 $0.00 05/03/94 01085 47200 $0.00 05/03/94 00036 47201 $0.00 05/03/94 921227 01054 47202 $0.00 05/03/94 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PACE 0023 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND 0 ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK M DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ 0 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL $213.48 R PEP BOYS 00608 001-400-2101-4311 01842 $30.35 2076261 01056 47203 BATTERY/PD UNIT/APR 94 76261 04/05/94 POLICE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $30.35 PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRAKE SERV 03910 001-400-2101-4311 ALIGN PD DODGE DIPLOMAT 1965 03/25/94 POLICE PORTERS ALIGNMENT & BRAKE SERV PD RESERVE CAR ALIGNMENT 1939 03910 001-400-2101-4311 03/16/94 POLICE 01839 $47. 50 /AUTO MAINTENANCE 01840 $52. 50 /AUTO MAINTENANCE *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $100.00 1965 08215 47204 $47.50 05/03/94 1939 08211 47204 $52.50 05/03/94 R PRIMA — CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 03927 705-400-1209-4315 00049 $25.00 08419 47205 ANNUAL. DUES/R. BLACKWOOD 04/20/94 LIABILITY INS /MEMBERSHIP $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $25. 00 PTO SALES 03629 001-400-3103-4311 00988 $86.23 31865 08630 47206 ST -SWEEPER CABLES - 31665 --- --04/11/94 — 6T MAINTENANCE /AUTO MAINTENANCE $90.24 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $86. 23 R RAMADA INN 04472 001-400-2101-4312 02286 $145.20 08160 47207 :--------- • HOTEL/P: WOLCOTT- ---—__._.._04120/94----------------POL-I-GE-.._.-._--_.._. ._../TRAVEL EXPENSE-,- POST $0:00 05/03/94 41I 4'1 *** VENDOR TOTAL ******************************************************************** $145. 20 R RED LION INN 04269 001-400-2101-4316 01113 $231.00 TR420 00420 47208 HOTEL/V: ELLEDGE • TR420 -- 04/28/94 ---- POLICE - .. /TRAINING $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $231. 00 A SYLVIA*ROOT • 04061 001-400-4102-4201 00456 $212.75 405 04/20/94 ...............PLANNING COMM - /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT • MINUTES SEC/4--5-94 405 05866 47209 $0.00 05/03/94 1s . r11"° Ff5Ct'..454: §i,rr1n ., )IZdATFnWIT3:7 i , _:. � .. fF;ry:«FAii5UP4TMOd ar4AWigilM7adJu.r..�Nhwaaus. .. �, . FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 • • • , PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0024 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CNK 0 DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL $212.75 R ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 05613 001-400-4204-4309 02831 11,071.35 VARIOUS 08083 47210 WIRE/ELECTRICAL PARTS RIOUS 04/01/94 BLDG MAINT /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 11,072.10 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $1,071.35 R ED*RUZAK & ASSOCIATES 01578 001-400-3104-4201 00183 $1,020.00 94125 08659 47211 TRAFFIC ENG/MARCH 94 94125 03/31/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,020.00 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 001-400-1212-4188 02999 $818.89 00019 47212 CITY,HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 05/03/94 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS i 04398 105-400-2601-4188 01630 $60.25 00019 47212 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 05/03/94 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 110-400-1204-4188 00266 $23.88 00019 47212 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 05/03/94 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 110-400-3302-4188 01900 $142.41 00019 47212 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 05/03/94 SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 . 04398 160-400-3102-4188 01612 $38.99 00019 47212 04/28/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 05/03/94 R SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLANS 04398 170-400-2103-4188 00557 $11.94 00019 47212 CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 04/28/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,096.36 R SAN BERNARDINO CO SHERIFFS' 04467 001-400-2101-4312 02289 $380.00 08161 47213 TUITION/P. WOLCOTT 04/20/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $380.00 R SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 00151 001-400-2101-4251 00542 $9.42 60823 00035 47214 BOOKING FEE AOJ/JUL—NOV 60823 04/15/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 05/03/94 c X7Ss '' fL •,w ,r +� sy fyN �iCiR� fiNgM3�ANilu''tif'''tL� u. t 7 '�'n` St}�3it' f1� '2''`'p'., �,irif.�wn;.i.Y PC4 EY_.o..� ♦1-7AtL.,.i-�a'A`'�;...�. 'Li05 �..., VsA?� t' l _.r. n .6,3v`. Je/�S'.• o"0.ip;t.14�..m ° .-47.f....1 ✓$�.s f r fj� la 2Z�ti rin J FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0025 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN M AMOUNT INV/REF PO k CHK 4* DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL***************************************************************ate *** • • $9.42 AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP R SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-2201-4305 00675 $27.06 10359 06243 47215 BUSINESS CARDS/G. DALE 10359 04/10/94 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES $27.06 05/03/94 R SHORELINE PRINTING 03505 001-400-4201-4305 00936 $97.43 BUILDING INSPECTION CARD 10338 - ----04/12/94 - •- BUILDING /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *** VENDOR TOTAL $124.49 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. DISCOUNT OFFERED 01399 001-202-0000-2021 00630 51406 04/12/94 $3.07 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 10338 07241 47215 $97.43 05/03/94 25-51406 01061 47216 $0.00 05/03/94 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-202-0000-2022 00623 $3.07CR 25-51406 01061 47216 DISCOUNT TAKEN 51406 04/12/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 05/03/94 R SINCLAIR PAINT CO. 01399 001-400-4204-4309 02832 $150.31 25-51406 01061 47216 PAINT/C ITV - BLDGS/APR 94 51406 .. .--- ---04/12/94---- -. --- .-- - .- BLDG MAINT -----/MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $150.31 R KATHY*SLIFF 04072 001-300-0000-3893 04483 $30.00 77771 08553 47217 SPRING--CLASS-REFUND -4-7-77 1- 04/07$94— /CONTR RECREATION CLASSES -$0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $30.00 R SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 00114 001-400-4601-4308 00983 $95.74 4502316 01062 47218 - -- COMM RES PROD SUPP/MAR94 02316------03/29/94— — — -COMM-RESOURCES-:-/PROGRAM MATERIALS $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $95.74 R SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL COURT 00118 110-300-0000-3302 58162 $25,586.00 CITE SURCHARGE/MAR 94 *** VENDOR TOTAL �I R SOUTH BAY WELDERS J TANK REFILL/FIRE/MAR 94 10922 04/20/94 /COURT FINES/PARKING 00018 001-400-2201-4309 03/18/94 • FIRE $25,586.00 06469 47219 $0.00 05/03/94 01608 $35.18 10922 01065 47220 /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 05/03/94 FINANCE—SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ••• VENDOR TOTAL CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN N AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ N ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION R SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY ANNUAL EMISSION FEE/1993 ••• VENDOR TOTAL R R R R R R PAGE 0026 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO N CHK * AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *35. 18 01688 001-400-3104-4309 01165 *134.03 04/25/94 TRAFFIC SAFETY /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/APR 94 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/APR 94 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTFIICI BILLS/APR .94 1•'f ''' ;i • . ' .::y.)] • y1•1' $OUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDISPIC O. ELECTRIC'., B ILL$/APR1`)94 ciss SOUTHERN CALIFO�tNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC BILLS/APR 94 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ELECTRIC DILLG/APR 94 ••• VENDOR TOTAL *134. 03 00159 001-400-3101-4303 00330 *66.18 04/28/94 MEDIANS /UTILITIES 00159 04/28/94 001-400-3104-4303 00196 *598. 18 TRAFFIC SAFETY /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-4204-4303 00769 *6,734.04 04/28/94 BLDG MAINT /UTILITIES 00159 001-400-6101-4303 00575 41,719.91 04/28/94 PARKS /UTILITIES 00159. 105-400-2601-4303 00486 *233.21 04/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /UTILI•TIES 00159 160-400-3102-4303 00263 $84.22 04/28/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /UTILITIES R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ST LITE BILLS/MARCH 94 01717 ••• VENDOR TOTAL *9,435.74 00442 105-400-2601-4303 00487 411,791.80 04/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /UTILITIES R SOUTHWESTERN PETROLEUM CORP. GREASE/HEAVY EQUIPMENT 10494 ••• VENDOR TOTAL 411, 791.80 05692 160-400-3102-4310 00137 4208.00 04/07/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /MOTOR FUELS AND LUBES R SQUEEKERS & HERB *208. 00 03480 001-400-4601-4308 00984 4159.34 COMM RES STAFF UNIFORMS 1300 03/25/94 COMM RESOURCES /PROGRAM MATERIALS 08666 47221 $0.00 05/03/94 01065 47222 $0.00 04/28/94 01065 47222 $0.00 04/28/94 01065 47222 $0.00 04/28/94 01065 47222 40.00 04/28/94 01065 47222 $0.00 04/28/94 01065 47222 $0.00 04/28/94 101715 00012 47223 $0.00 04/2B/94 210494 08613 47224 *208. 00 05/03/94 1500 08572 47225 *159.34 05/03/94 r FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07:17:37 31 nl CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST PAGE 0027 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK DESCRIPTION DATE INVC PROJ • ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP *** VENDOR TOTAL $159.34 R STANDARD CONCRETE PRODUCTS 05195 001-202-0000-2021 00625 $12.00 01014 47226 DISCOUNT OFFERED 04/15/94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED $0.00 04/28/94 R STANDARD CONCRETE PRODUCTS 05195 001-202-0000-2022 00618 $12.000R 01014 47226 DISCOUNT.TAKEN•- - -- 04/15/94 - - - - /DISCOUNTS TAKEN $0.00 04/28/94 R ' STANDARD CONCRETE PRODUCTS CONCRETE PURCHASES/APR94 *** VENDOR TOTAL 05195 001-400-3103-4309 01645 $1,227.75 01014 47226 04/28/94 ST MAINTENANCE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 04/28/94 $1,227.75 R STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00364 001-400-2101-4251 00543 $272.00 931687 00023 47227 FINGERPRINT APPS/MAR 94 31687 04/18/94 POLICE /CONTRACT SERVICE/GOVT $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $272. 00 R DALE*STOCK ENTERPRISES 05727 001-210-0000-2110 05685 $1,600.00 66514 08332 47228 WORK GUARANTEE REFUND 66514 04/20/94 /DEPOSITS/WORK GUARANTEE $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL $1,600.00 4J a.i.— 'R SUN BADGE COMPANY 00806 110-400-3302-4187 00469 $52.26 63855 01070 47229 SUPVSR BADGES/COMM SERV 63855 03/24/94 PARKING ENF /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $0.00 05/03/94 * * * * * * VENDOR TOTAL $52. 26 R SUPERIOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 00425 001-400-2201-4309 01607 $27.00 100493 01071 47230 OXYGEN TANK REFILL/APR94 00493 04/19/94 FIRE /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $0.00 05/03/94 VENDOR TOTAL R J. E.*TALLERICO COMPUTER SERV/CONVERSION $27. 00 04247 001-400-1206-4201 01266 $225.00 07849 47231 04/27/94 DATA PROCESSING /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 ***I VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $225. 00 R TELEDINE ENGINEERING, INC. 05721 115-400-8141-4201 00013 $3,203.00 1122 08660 47232 PROG PMT/HERM AVE REHAB 1122 03/22/94 ST REHABILITATN/CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVATE $0.00 05/03/94 anumazawagat V. "IN FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07: 17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 VND * ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN # AMOUNT DATE INVC PROJ # ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT OFFERED R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY DISCOUNT TAKEN R TODD PIPE & SUPPLY PLUMBING SUPP/APRIL 94 PAGE 0028 DATE 05/04/94 INV/REF PO # CHK # AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP $3,203.00 00124 001-202-0000-2021 00627 $5.16 04/28/94 DISCOUNTS OFFERED 00124 001-202-0000-2022 00620 $5.16CR 04/28/94 /DISCOUNTS TAKEN 00124 125-400-8508-4309 00063 $252.33 04/28/94 PK IRRIG IMPRV /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $252.33 R TOOL CITY TOOL BOX/PUBLIC WORKS 592 05693 105-400-2601-4309 01002 $321.50 03/30/94 STREET LIGHTING /MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $321.50 R DEBORAH*TORRES DESIGN POSTERS/NPDES 05624 160-400-8302-4201 00013 $250.00 04/12/94 CIP 87-302 /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $250.00 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL.. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 00240 001-400-1212-4188 02998 $855.26 04/28/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 105-400-2601-4188 01629 $18.19 04/28/94 STREET LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 109-400-3301-4180 00099 $1.91 04/28/94 _ DNTN ENHANC COMM/RETIREMENT 00240 110-400-1204-4188 00265 $24.51 04/28/94 FINANCE CASHIER/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 110-400-3302-4188 01899 $43.08 04/28/94 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 155-400-2102-4188 01007 $1.08 04/28/94 •-- CROSSING GUARD /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 01073 47233 $0. 00 04/28/94 01073 47233 $0. 00 04/28/94 01073 47233 $0. 00 04/28/94 592 08622 47234 $321.50 05/03/94 08081 47235 $250.00 05/03/94 00029 47236 $0.00 05/03/94 00029 47236 $0.00 05/03/94 00029 47236 $0.00 05/03/94 00029 47236 $0.00 05/03/94 00029 47236 $0.00 05/03/94 00029 47236 $0.00 05/03/94 i-_ 14 J JI. j.1 • FINANCE-SFA340 TIME 07: 17:37 PAY VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 . TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL, CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 0** VENDOR TOTAL R CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEMAND LIST FOR 05/03/94 PAGE 0029 DATE 05/04/94 VND N ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN $ AMOUNT INV/REF PO * CHK * DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP 00240 160-400-3102-4188 01611 •14.76 04/28/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 170-400-2103-4188 00556 $21.60 04/28/94 SPEC INVESTGTNS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 705-400-1209-4188 00858 $4.66 04/28/94 -. - --- --LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 00240 705-400-1217-4188 00965 *5. 81 04/28/94 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRANSPORTATION CHARTER SERV. BUS DEPOSIT/COM RES TRIP 12933 sirs VENDOR TOTAL $990. 86 00029 47236 $0.00 05/03/94 00029 47236 $0.00 05/03/94 00029 47236 $0.00 05/03/94 00029 47236 30.00 05/03/94 05018 145-400-3409-4201 00123 *66.00 12933 08559 47237 .04/20/94 • REC TRANBPTN /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/M-AY 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY I CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY I CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R UNUM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 R t,UNUMILONG TERM DISABILITY INS. CITY HEALTH INS/MAY 94 *66. 00 03790 001-400-1212-4188 03003 31,804.50 04/28/94 EMP BENEFITS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS NS. 03790 105-400-2601-4188 01634 3128.96 -------04/28/94-------------------STREET--LIGHTING /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -- 03790 109-400-3301-4188 00533 *5.69 04/28/94 DNTN ENHANC COMM/EMPLOYEE BENEFITS NS. 03790 110-400-1204-4188 00270 $120.25 - .04/28/94-- ...........FINANCE CASHIER /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS F,o-r11 Il1 triti:M:+\ '• d.y 03790 110-400-3302-4188 01904 3201.62 04/28/94 PARKING ENF /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 160-400-3102-4188 01616 $73.47 04/28/94 SEWER/ST DRAIN /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 705-400-1209-4188 00861 $18.75 04/28/94 LIABILITY INS /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 03790 705-400-1217-4188 00969 424.42 04/28/94 WORKERS COMP /EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ra • ,T . 00022 47238 $0.00 05/03/94 00022 47238 30.00 05/03/94 00022 47238 $0.00 05/03/94 00022 47238 30.00 05/03/94 00022 47238 *0.00 05/03/94 00022 47238 $0.00 05/03/94 00022 47238 $0.00 05/03/94 00022 47238 $0. 00 05/03/94 �: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FINANCE—SFA34O DEMAND LIST PAGE 0030 41 TIME 07:17:37 FOR 05/03/94 DATE 05/04/94 PAY VENDOR NAME VND M ACCOUNT NUMBER TRN 0 AMOUNT INV/REF PO M CHK 0 ' DESCRIPTION •. DATE INVC PROJ M ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT UNENC DATE EXP • • *** VENDOR TOTAL *2, 377. 66 R V & V MANUFACTURING 01938 001-400-2101-4187 OO6OB *233 71 2390 07783 47239 BADGES/MOORE & SAVOY 2390 04/07/94 POLICE /UNIFORM ALLOWANCE *130.87 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL R WHITMORE, JOHNSON & BOLANOS *233. 71 05129 001-400-1203-4201 01201 *1,853.10 WJB356 08422 LEGAL SERV/MARCH 94 JB356 04/08/94 PERSONNEL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** *1,853.10 R PAUL *WOLCOTT 00129 001-400-2101-4312 02287 *84.00 MEALS/P. 0. 8. T. CLASS 04/20/94 POLICE /TRAVEL EXPENSE , POST 0 *** VENDOR TOTAL***************+**************************************************** 684.00 • • • I". • • 08159 *0. 00 47240 05/03/94 47241 05/03/94 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-1208-4201 01120 *338.75 041297629 00021 47242 COPIER MAINT/JAN—MAR 94 97629 04/01/94 GEN APPROP /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT *0.00 05/03/94 R XEROX CORPORATION COPIER TONER/FIRE 00135 001-400-2201-4305 00676 *549.91 152195879 08216 47242 95879 - 03/31/94 FIRE /OFFICE OPER SUPPLIES *549.91 05/03/94 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-2401-4201 00424 $97.35 041297631 00024 47242 COPIER MAINT/JAN—MAR 94 97631 04/01/94 ANIMAL CONTROL /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 001-400-4601-4201 02244 $295.00 041297628 00025 47242 COPIER MAINT/JAN—MAR 94 97628 04/01/94 • COMM RESOURCES /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 R XEROX CORPORATION 00135 110-400-3302-4201 00439 *197.65 041297631 00024 47242 COPIER MAINT/JAN—MAR 94 97631 04/01/94 PARKING ENF /CONTRACT SERVICE/PRIVAT $0.00 05/03/94 *** VENDOR TOTAL******************************************************************** $1,478.66 *** PAY CODE TOTAL****************************************************************** $166,185.14 * * * TOTAL`WARRANTS ****************************************************************** •r:..; .� .,., i` i r p, y✓t�� 4d"c ,'k �t^X : ;�: �nk^.e4•�,dF' {5•r,'t7 ,a�> fill/ V.1/s,,F3b;1;,14 } Y��?tiirtl£ N` $895,085.59 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS OR CLAIMS�COVERED BY THE WARNANTS LISTED Url PAGES—/TO c.c/ wINCLUSIVE, OF THE WARRANT REGIS!! Ft F017 ._...4r. -0/f14 ARE ACCURATE, FUNDS ARC AVAILABLE F'OI2 PA::.:i.N., ,.i,,., r.12E l CONFORMANCe TO THE BUDGET. MY FINANCE DIIRLCIOR DATE • May 5, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members Regular Meeting of of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS May 24, 1994 City telephone system Police Chief Ordinance to amend portions of Article 13.5 of the zoning ordinance, signs, to create exceptions for historic signs and for grand opertings. Planning Director Film permit policies Community Resources Director Report on Community Development Block Grants City Manager Liability Claims Attorney List Personnel Director/Risk Manager Approve contract for Third Party Administration of Worker's Compensation claims Personnel Director/Risk Manager Public Hearing: Special study of the commercial permitted use list including adding or deleting the requirement for conditional use permits for certain uses, the conditions for certain uses, and considering what uses are permitted in each zone. (Continued from 4/26/94) ** Thursday, May 31, 1994 Planning Director JOINT STUDY SESSION: CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION ** June 2, 1994 JOINT STUDY SESSION: CITY COUNCIL/HERMOSA BEACH SCHOOL DISTRICT/PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION ** Monday, June 6, 1994 Budget/OP Study Session June 14, 1994 Storm drain/sewer tie-in ** Monday, June 20, 1994 Budget/CIP Study Session (if needed) June 28, 1994 Public Hearing: '94-'95 Budget Adoption July 12, 1994 Public Works Director 2nd Quarter General Plan Amendments: Air Quality Element Planning Director Special study of zoning ordinance and enforcement ordinance re: parking in front yard setback Planning Director UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED Initiated by: Council Alternatives for funding underground utilities Council - Emergency generator capability in local grocery stores with incentive program to be provided Council Revision of HBMC provisions pertaining to construction of public street improvements (Public Hearing) Public Works Director Police Chief Public Works .Director Staff County Safe Neighborhood Park Act (Grant -Prop A) application for municipal pier renovation Assistant City Manager Council -- _ Bring back Ordinance on Fire Flow condition and consider revision or abolishment of Fire - Flow Fee. Public Works Director 2 UPCOMING ITEMS NOT YET CALENDARED (Continued) Council Council Ordinance for new Chapter 19 of HBMC entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic" Caltrans utility maintenance agreement South School Park Architectural Plan/ encroachment issues Final Map #23863 for a 2 -lot subdivision at 1538 Silver Street Public Hearing: Cable Television Franchise Renewal - MultiVision Cable Adopt Cable Operator Ordinance Amendment to Circulation Element to include the North portion of the Strand bikeway and pedestrian path for improvements. Report on parking permit grace period Pier Subcommittee reports 3 Public Works Director Public Works Director Community Resources Director Planning Director Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Planning Director Finance Director Assistant City Manager April 26, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 RECOMMENDATION TO DENY CLAIMS Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council deny the following claims and refer them to the City's Liability Claims Administrator. 1. Claimant • Date of Loss: Date Filed . Allegation . 2. Claimant • Date of Loss: Date Filed Allegation 3. Claimant • Date of Loss: Date Filed . Allegation . Simon, Richard 03/01/94 03/23/94 Injuries caused when claimant fell from wall at 11th Street and Hermosa Avenue. Shean, Robert Scott 03/22/94 03/28/94 Failure to maintain tree. Damage to vehicle when wind blown Palm frond cracked windshield. Leonard, Roy 09/10/73 03/09/94 Failure to maintain public sidewalk in safe condition at Second & Valley caused injury when claimant tripped. A copy of each of the claims is available in the Office of the City Clerk for review. Respectfully submitted, Robert A. Blackwood, Director Personnel and Risk Management cc: Bill Fuentes, Colen & Lee pers/claim 1 Concur: Z9 tephen R. Burrell City Manager 1d April 27, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution establishing the terms and conditions of employment for the Management Association for the period July 16, 1993 through July 15, 1995. Background: On January 12, 1993, the Council approved Resolution NO. 93-5588 which established the terms and conditions of employment for the Department Directors. Those approved terms were for the period July 16, 1992 through July 15, 1993. Discussions regarding renewal terms were postponed past the July 15, 1993 date awaiting finalization of the Police and Teamster contracts. Discussions between the City Manager and members of the Management Association have been concluded and agreement reached within the parameters authorized by the City Council. Analysis: Changes to the Management Resolution are as follows: 1. TERM: July 16, 1993 through July 15, 1995. 2. COMPENSATION: A 1% increase in base salary effective July 1, 1994 (Section 2.16) Budget Impact: $5,088 for FY 94/95 3. MANAGEMENT LEAVE: Increase of 20 hours per calendar year (Section 3.2) Budget Impact: None. Management leave has no cash value. Recognizes additional hours management employees spend at night meetings. i 4. LIFE INSURANCE: Increase in amount from S52,000 to twice annual salary. (Section 4.2) Budget Impact: $1,800 per year. 5. MEDICAL INSURANCE: Increase monthly medical stipend $50 per month (Section 4.1) Budget Impact: $3,600 per year. ($900 FY 93/94) 6. MERIT PAY: Effective January 1, 1994 the provision for quarterly merit pay is eliminated and amount is built into salary. (Section 2.4) Budget Impact: None. Full 5% quarterly merit pay is budgeted each year. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager mw/mgmt RESOLUTION NO.. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 93-5588 AND ESTABLISHING SALARY, BENEFITS AND OTHER CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, the City Council and the Management employees have agreed to establish the terms and conditions of employment for management employees through a less formal process than meet and confer negotiations; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager, representing the City Council, and the members of the Management Association have discussed and agreed upon certain terms and conditions of employment; and, WHEREAS, it is the philosophy of the City Council to at- tempt to pay more competitive salaries to the City's employees, and to recognize the significant role which Management plays in the organization achieving its goals and objectives and, WHEREAS, in return for that recognition the City does ex- pect superior performance from its Management employees; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That Resolution No. 93-5588 is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION II. The following compensation procedures for Management em- ployees is hereby approved in its entirety to read as follows: MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION PROVISIONS FOR THE PERIOD COMMENCING JULY 16, 1993 THROUGH JULY 15, 1995 ARTICLE 1 - PREAMBLE SECTION 1.1 Intent The provisions of this agreement have been developed in the interest of promoting and improving employee relations between the City of Hermosa Beach, California and the Management Em- ployees who have been represented by the Management Employees' Association. ARTICLE 2 — COMPENSATION SECTION 2.1 Base Monthly Salary a) The City agrees to hire and appropriately compensate capable management personnel. They will be professional, adequately trained, meet standards required for such positions, and the Council reaffirms that compensation will include such items as salary, contribution for PERS, vehicle, deferred compensation, cafeteria -style options of compensation, merit and retirement. It is the intent to pay the approximate average of selected sur- vey cities in recognition of the different role which management plays in an organization and to expect superior performance from the organization's managers. b) The base monthly salaries of the management positions shall be as follows: Personnel & Risk Management Dir. 4261 4474 4698 4933 Community Resources Director 4674 4908 5153 5411 Building Director 4789 5029 5280 5544 Planning Director 4869 5112 5368 5636 Finance Director 4976 5224 5486 5760 Community Development Director 4976 5244 5486 5760 Public Works Director 5237 5498 5773 6062 Police Chief 5750 6038 6339 6656 c) Effective July 1, 1994 base monthly salaries shall be in- creased one -percent (1%). SECTION 2.2 SURVEY CITIES a) The following cities are established as the "survey cities" to be used for compensation comparison purposes: Bell, Clair- mont, Coronado, El Segundo, Glendora, LaVerne, Laguna Beach, Man- hattan Beach, Montclair, Placentia, San Gabriel, Seal Beach, and Tustin. b.) It is the goal of the City to be at 98% of the mean of the survey city salaries at such time as it is fiscally prudent. For salary comparison purposes, base salary shall be increased 2.5% to adjust for merit pay until such time as merit pay is eliminated pursuant to section 2.4. SECTION 2.3 Educational Allowance. a) In the event that the employee enters upon a program of education at an accredited university or college, which program has been previously approved in writing by the City Manager, the employee shall be entitled to a vocational allowance in an amount equal to sixty-six percent (66%) of the tuition actually paid by such employee, which tuition was paid after written approval as aforesaid, and which sums shall be paid by the City within thirty days after submission of proof of payment of said tuition by the employee in accordance with the terms of this paragraph. SECTION 2.4 Merit Pay. - a) Merit pay shall be in an amount equal to -5% to +5% of month- ly salary, payable in three (3) month increments. b) The standard to be considered in the evaluation will be de- gree of response to those goals and objectives established between the Department Head and the City Manager at the commence- ment of the evaluation period, as well as fulfilling the needs of the respective departments and the City. c) Comments in awarding the merit pay by the City Manager will be considered from the respective department heads. Said evalua- tions to be conducted quarterly and in a timely manner. d) Effective January 1, 1994 Merit Pay shall be eliminated and base salary as reflected in section 2.1(b) shall be increased five -percent (5%). SECTION 2.5 Deferred Compensation. a) Each employee, individually, may elect to participate in any deferred compensation plan offered by the City SECTION 2.6 Additional Compensation. a) Should responsibilities of a position change significantly, the compensation for the classification shall be established fol- lowing completion of an appropriate salary survey. Said salary shall be commensurate with the new responsibilities. SECTION 2.7 Assistant City Manager Premium Pay a) Management employees may be designated by the City Manager as Assistant City Manager for the purpose of special or general as- signments. Such designation shall be mutually agreed to by the City Manager and the Department Director(s). Assignments may be daily, weekly or monthly and shall be paid as a per diem base premium of 5 to 20 percent, said amount to be mutually determined at time of designation. b) An individual so assigned shall report directly to the City Manager and shall operate within specified written goals and objectives. c) Said appointment shall terminate at the pleasure of either party with thirty days written notification. 3 ARTICLE 3-- WAGE SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION 3.1 Vacation. a) Upon employment, Management employees shall accrue vacation at the following rates: 1) 96 hours per year through (4) years of service; 2) 120 hours per year, five (5) years through (9) years of service; 3) 160 hours per year, ten (10) years or more of service. b) Further, the employee may be paid cash in lieu of unused vacation in excess of two weeks vacation at any time after utilization of forty (40) hours paid vacation during each calen- dar year. c) Vacation may be accrued up to a thirty (30) month accrual level, with an automatic cash -out of hours in excess of that amount. Employees with a current, as of May 1, 1994, accrual balance in excess of that amount shall have that amount es- tablished as their maximum accrual until such time as their ac- crual is diminished to a thirty (30) month accrual level. d) Employees shall be reimbursed for 100% unused vacation days accrued upon resignation, retirement or imposed termination from their employment with the City. SECTION 3.2 Management Leave a) Employees shall be allowed sixty (60) hours of additional leave each calendar year in addition to flex time for extraordi- nary assignments, fixed holidays, vacation, and bereavement leave. Management leave does not accumulate or carry over, it must be used each year. Said management leave shall have no monetary value and shall be prorated for partial year's service. 1. Effective January 1, 1994 said leave shall be increased to 80 hours. SECTION 3.3 Holidays a) Holidays shall be consistent with those provided to employees governed by the Administrative Employees Bargaining Unit. SECTION 3.4 Sick Leave a) Basis of sick leave. 1) Accrual shall be at six (6) hours per month. After 176 hours accrued, member may cash in the excess annually at 100% rate. Maximum accrual will be 500 hours. Any excess will be automatically cashed in at 100% rate. This to be paid with the second paycheck of December each year. 4 b) Use of sick leave. 2) Sick leave shall be used only in case of sickness or dis- ability of the employee or for family sick leave. Misuse of sick leave shall be grounds for disciplinary action. c) Notification of sickness. 1) To receive compensation while absent on sick leave, the employee shall notify the City Manager. 2) When absence is for more than three (3) consecutive work- ing days, upon request, it must be verified by a written state- ment, stating the cause of absence, from an attending physician or a personal affidavit and the employee shall furnish any other proof of sickness reasonably required by the City Manager. d) Family Sick Leave. 1) In case of serious illness of a member of the immediate family, the employee may utilize sick leave. 2) Pregnancy is an allowable use. 3) Immediate family for the purpose of this Section shall be defined as; spouse, mother, mother-in-law, father, father-in- law, sister, brother, (step)child or guardian, stepfather, step- mother, grandparents, or grandchildren. 4) Such time shall be deducted from the existing sick leave of the employee. e) Return from Sick Leave. 1) Upon return from sick leave, an employee may be required to report for examination by the City medical examiner to deter- mine fitness for duty. f) Employees covered by this agreement shall, upon resignation, retirement, or imposed termination from their employment with the City be reimbursed for 50% of unused sick days accrued at current rate. SECTION 3.5 Bereavement Leave. a) Each employee covered by this agreement shall receive a maxi- mum of three (3) days per calendar year to be utilized for Bereavement Leave because of a death in their immediate family (as defined in #3 above). Said time will not be cumulative from one twelve month period to another nor will pay in lieu of unused leave be provided. SECTION 3.6 Retirement a) The City shall pay the employee's full retirement share of P.E.R.S. SECTION 3.7 Vehicle Allowance a) Management employees shall be reimbursed $.22 per mile for use of their private vehicles for city use. SECTION 3.8 Uniform Allowance a) The Police Chief shall be compensated the same uniform al- lowance as the next subordinate rank in the Police Department. ARTICLE 4 - INSURANCE SECTION 4.1 Intent a) The City will have full responsibility for all Health and Welfare programs enacted and/or in force as of July 1, 1989. Current Health, Dental, Long Term Disability, Life Insurance, Vision Program, Mental health, or their equivalent to remain in force. b) The City will pay for employees' Long Term Disability, Life Insurance, and full family coverage of dental and vision care. c) Each employee shall receive the amount of $400.00 per month for the purchase of medical insurance. 1. Effective April 1, 1994 the amount indicated above shall be increased to $450.00 per month. d) An employee utilizing the Long Term Disability Plan shall not accrue vacation, sick leave, holiday pay and allowances after the 90th day of disability. e) Any portion of the City's premiums for the full coverage plan which includes the employee and one dependent, or a stated cash amount, plus family where applicable, that is unused will be in- cluded as a cash payment for each of the twenty-four pay periods during the year. SECTION 4.2 Life Insurance. a) City shall provide term life insurance for all employees covered by this agreement in an amount equal to twice the indi- vidual's annual salary. SECTION 4.3 Continuation of Medical Premium upon Retirement a) Employees shall be eligible, upon service retirement from the City, for a medical premium supplement. Said supplement shall be in the following amount: 1) For service retirement at age fifty-five (55) with a mini- mum of ten (10) years continuous service with the City, a sixty dollar ($60.00) per month (or cost of policy, whichever is less) insurance supplement. 6 • 2) For service retirement at age fifty-five (55) with a mini- mum of twenty (20) years continuous service an eighty dollar ($80.00) per month (or cost of policy, whichever is less) in- surance supplement. 3) Said supplement shall commence with the first month follow- ing the employee's service retirement in which the employee is responsible for payment of the insurance premium. 4) In order to be eligible for medical supplemental payments, an employee must either remain on a medical insurance plan of- fered by the City or provide proof of coverage on a self procured medical insurance plan. 5) Any payments made by the City shall be made directly to a medical insurance provider. In no case will payments be made directly to an individual. 6) If an employee who has taken a service retirement, and is receiving a benefit under this section, later applies for and receives a disability retirement, all payments advanced under this section shall be reimbursed to the City and no further pay- ments shall be made. 7) Any employee receiving a benefit under this section agrees to apply for, and enroll in, any Federal and/or State medical insurance plan (e.g. MediCare, Medicaid) for which they become eligible. ARTICLE 5 - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS SECTION 5.1 Annual Physical Examination a) All employees covered by this agreement shall be provided with a complete physical medical examination at the doctor or Medical Facility of the City's choice, or have the option of utilizing Daniel Freeman Hospital, Center for Heart and Health at the City's expense. b) The annual examination is to include at least the following: review of medical history; urinalysis; VDRL; X -Rays, (chest PA, lumbar spine and cervical); blood groupings; EKG;glipid analysis, SECTION 5.2 Liability Insurance a) Except as provided in Government Code Section 995.2, CITY shall provide a defense including but not limited to legal coun- sel in: a) any civil action or proceeding described in Govt. Code Section 995; b) any administrative action or proceeding described in Section 995.6; or any criminal action or proceeding described in Govt. Code Section 995.8. "Proceeding" as used in this sec- tion is applicable to situations where a claim or action is threatened, but not filed, if a reasonable, prudent person would consult or retain counsel in response to the possibility of actu- al civil, administrative, or criminal action. If CITY pays for a defense, but a court or tribunal issues a final ruling that would, under Section 995.2 , preclude CITY payments for defense, employee shall immediately reimburse CITY, and if he/she fails to do so, CITY may offset any such amounts against compensation otherwise due employee under this agreement. SECTION 5.3 Jury Duty a) Employees covered by the Agreement shall not be eligible for base salary pay while serving on Jury Duty. SECTION 5.4 Military Leave a) All employees covered by this agreement shall be entitled to Military Leave as afforded by Federal and State law but shall not receive any base salary pay while on such Leave. ARTICLE 6 - OTHER PROVISIONS SECTION 6.1 Organizational Development and Management Training. a) $3,500.00 shall be budgeted each year for group training pur- poses. A committee comprised of the City Manager and two manage- ment employees shall select and schedule training programs for participation of employees covered by this agreement. ARTICLE 7 - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE SECTION 7.1 Intent a) This grievance procedure shall be used to resolve disputes arising from any allegation by management employees that the City has violated the terms of this resolution. SECTION 7.2 Procedure b) The complaint shall be presented in writing to the City Man- ager. The City Manager shall have five (5) working days of receipt of the complaint to resolve the issue or respond to it in writing stating the reasons for the failure to resolve it. This exhausts all administrative remedies. ARTICLE 8 - GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 8.1 Probationary Period A. There shall be a one (1) year probationary period for all appointments to the management classes as described in this Resolution. SECTION 8.2 Non-discrimination, Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Action. a) The City and its Management Employees agree that both parties have a crucial role in the development and implementation of equal employment opportunities. Both parties mutually accept responsibility for carrying out these provisions. b) The parties agree to cooperate actively and positively in supporting the concept for all employees and to seek and achieve the highest potential and productivity in employment situations. The City and its Management Employees agree to provide encourage- ment, assistance, and appropriate training opportunities so that all employees may utilize their abilities to the fullest extent. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution; shall cause the same to be entered among the original resolution of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City in the minutes at which time same is passed and adopted PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST: day of , 1993. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: mgtres94/contract City Clerk City Attorney 9 April 26, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 LEASE RENEWAL FOR THE SOUTH BAY FREE CLINNIC FOR ROOM 7 IN THE COMMUNITY CENTER Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the attached lease agreement between the City and the South Bay Free Clinic for the use of Room 7 in the Community Center. It is further recommended that Council authorize the Mayor to sign the attached lease. Background The South Bay Free Clinic was awarded a grant in 1992 that enables them to lease office space. They moved their administrative offices of the HIV Program from their main facility in Manhattan Beach to the Community Center. Room 7 houses the "hot line" and the staff of the program. They conduct meetings, training and occasionally support groups but do not conduct any medical services. Analysis Revenue generated from the lease of Room 7 (1100 sq. ft.) will be $990 per month ($.90 sq. ft.). The attached lease conforms to the present rental policy (approved by Council on February 9, 1993) with all other conditions of the former lease remaining the same. Commission approval of the attached lease will help to insure that this well established social service organization continues to work in the community. 1Estimated Fiscal Impact FY 1994-95: $11,863 1 Concur: M. ill"ooney, Director Community Resources Dept. Stephen R. liiriell City Manager Respectfully submitted, Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: am.cLurga-4) Viki Copeland, Director Finance Dept. if HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 10th day of May, 1994, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and South Bay Free Clinic (Lessee). A. Recitals: 1. The City is the owner of a recreationaUcivic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Community Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One (1) year commencing on the 15th day of June , 1994, and ending on the 14th day of June , 1995. 2. Description of Premises. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Room 7 - 1100 sq. ft. in the Community Center 3. Rent. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent according to the following schedule: June 15, 1994 through June 30. 1994: $478 per month ($.87 sq. ft.) July 1. 1994 through May 31, 1995: $990 per month ($.90 sq. ft.) June 1 through June 14, 1995: $495 ($.90 sq. ft.) Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental payment on the first day of the following month. 3A. Other Conditions. The following additional conditions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises/building or placed in any windows. 3. All window treatments must receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. All remodel work shall receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. Use. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Administrative offices for HIV Program and for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development 5. Insurance Liability. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a combined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. Worker's Compensation Insurance. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and furnish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. Insurance Companies. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. Condition of the Premises Upon Termination of the Lease. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good condition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Lessee took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon demand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. Construction. Lessee is prohibited from making any alterations performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. Destruction, Partial Destruction or Necessity to Repair because of Conditions Caused by Other than Lessee. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the premises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction of repair if such reconstruction or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be terminated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. Hold Harmless. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any direct or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its officers, agents and employees arising out of the Lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all action, suits or other proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. Rules, Regulations and Ordinances. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Community Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. Taxes and Charges. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. Default. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pursuant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. Notice. Any notice required to be made or given pursuant to the provisions of this lease may be either personally served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Lessor: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 Lessee: SOUTH BAY FREE CLINIC 1807 Manhattan Beach Blvd. Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Suzanne Rivera, Executive Director Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. Attorneys Fees. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee may not sublease all or any portion of the premises without the written consent of the City, which consent may be granted or denied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. Successors. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first herein above set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: April 26, 1994 Ruben Ovando, Director of Finance for Executive Director April 26, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Regular Meeting of Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 PROJECT TOUCH LEASE RENEWAL AGREEMENT (ROOMS 3 AND 11) Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission and staff that Council approve the attached lease agreement between the City and Project Touch for Rooms 3 and 11 in the Community Center. It is further recommended that Council authorize the Mayor to sign the attached lease. Background Project Touch presently leases Rooms C, 11 and 3 in the Community Center. They have been tenants in the Center since October 1979. They have served Hermosa, Redondo and Manhattan Beaches high risk youth and their families for 17 years. Project Touch is a juvenile diversion program whose services include social and educational enrichment, counseling, meals, wilderness challenge camping and stepteen/stepfamily groups. Analysis The lease space for Rooms 3 and 11 is 929 sq. Ft. with a monthly rental of $836/mo ($.90 sq. ft.). The attached lease conforms to the present rental policy (approved by the City Council February 9, 1993) with all other conditions of the former lease remaining the same. Their residency in the Community Center has been of great value in addressing a vital social service function for Hermosa Beach. 'Estimated Fiscal Impact FY 1994-95: S10,392 r ooney, Director Community Resources Dept. j� Stephen R✓Burrell City Manager Respectfully submitted, Marsha Ernst Administrative Aide Community Resources Dept. Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Director Finance Dept. I p: HERMOSA BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER LEASE AGREEMENT This Leasing Agreement is made and entered into on this, the 10th day of May, 1994, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, a Municipal Corporation (City) and Project Touch (Lessee). A. Recitals: 1. The City is the owner of a recreational/civic service facility generally referred to as the Hermosa Beach Community Center (referred to herein as the "facility"). 2. The facility is subject to certain agreements and deed restrictions entered into on the 28th day of February 1978, between the City and the Hermosa Beach City School District and is further subject to certain provisions imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development as set forth in a document entitled Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Property and dated the 28th day of February 1978. These documents are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City and are public documents and by reference are incorporated into this leasing agreement and are referred to herein as the HUD and SCHOOL DISTRICT AGREEMENTS. 3. The Lessee desires to use a portion of the facility on the terms and conditions set out herein. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term. The term of this lease shall be for a period of One (1) year commencing on the 1st day of June , 1994, and ending on the 30th day of June , 1995. 2. Description of Premises. The Lessee is leasing from the City that portion of the facility described as: Rooms 3 and 11 - 929 sq. ft. in the Community Center 3. Rent. Lessee agrees to pay to the City rent according to the following schedule: June 1. 1994 through June 30, 1994: S360 per month (8.87 sq. ft.) Room 3 July 1. 1994 through June 30. 1995: S836 per month (S.90) sq. ft. Rooms 3/11 Payable on the first day of the month. If this lease commences on a day other than the first day of the month, then the Lessee shall pay upon the commencement of the lease the rental on a pro rata basis for the remainder of that month and commence a full rental payment on the first day of the following month. 3A. Other Conditions. The following additional conditions are agreed to by the Lessee: 1. Lessee shall not mark, drill or deface any walls, ceilings, floors, wood or iron work without Lessor's written consent. 2. No signs or awning shall be erected or maintained upon or attached to the outside of the premises/building or placed in any windows. 3. All window treatments must receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. All remodel work shall receive prior approval of the Lessor. 4. Use. The Lessee agrees to use the premises only for the following purpose or purposes: Counseling services and for no other purpose without the express written consent of the City. Lessee also agrees the premises shall not be used in violation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or School District Agreements as those agreements are interpreted by either the City or the Hermosa Beach City School District or the Department of Housing and Urban Development 5. Insurance Liability. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability insurance protecting Lessee in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of any one occurrence, and $1,000,000 for property damage or a combined single limit of $1,000,000. Such insurance shall name City of Hermosa Beach and their officers, employees, elected officials and members of Boards or Commissions as additional insured parties. Coverage shall be in accordance with the sample certificates and endorsements attached hereto and must include the coverage and provisions indicated. Lessee shall file and maintain the required certificate(s) of insurance with the other party to this agreement at all times during the term of this agreement. The certificate(s) is to be filed prior to the commencement of the work or event and should state clearly: (1) The additional insured requested; (2) Thirty day prior notice of change or cancellation to the City of Hermosa Beach; (3) Insurance is primary to that of the Additional Insured; (4) Coverage included; (5) Cross -liability clause. Worker's Compensation Insurance. Lessee shall obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this agreement Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability insurance and furnish the City (or Agency) with a certificate showing proof of such coverage. Such insurance shall not be cancelled or materially changed without a thirty (30) day prior written notice to: City Manager, City of Hermosa Beach. Insurance Companies. Insurance companies must be rated (B:XIII) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide. 6. Condition of the Premises Upon Termination of the Lease. Lessee agrees to keep and maintain the premises in good condition and repair and to return to the City the premises upon termination of this lease in the same condition as when Lessee took possession of the premises excepting any repairs or alterations which were approved by the City, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and does promise to pay the City upon demand the reasonable sums to repair the premises in the event of a violation of this provision. 7. Construction. Lessee is prohibited from making any alterations performing any construction whatsoever on the premises without the expressed written approval of the City. Any such approval shall include provisions to protect the City from potential liens of labor and material persons. 8. Destruction, Partial Destruction or Necessity to Repair because of Conditions Caused by Other than Lessee. The City has no duty or obligation to reconstruct the premises in the event of destruction or partial destruction of the premises. The City at its option may reconstruct or repair the premises, whereupon this lease shall remain in full force and effect except that no rent will be owing to the City during said period of reconstruction of repair if such reconstruction or repair interferes with the tenancy created herein to the extent that the premises cannot be used for the purposes intended. In the event the City at its sole discretion determines not to reconstruct or repair the premises then either party at its option may cause this lease to be terminated and neither party shall have any liability each to each other. 9. Hold Harmless. Lessee shall hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees from every claim or demand which may be made by reason of any injury and/or death to persons and/or injury to property caused by any direct or indirect act or any omission of the Lessee, its officers, agents and employees arising out of the Lessee's use of said premises. The Lessee, at its own cost, expense and risk shall defend any and all action, suits or other proceedings that may be brought or instituted against the City on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the Lessor on any such action, suit, or legal proceedings as a result hereof. 10. Rules, Regulations and Ordinances. The Lessee agrees to comply strictly with all applicable laws and any uniform Community Center rules and regulations adopted by the City Council. 11. Taxes and Charges. Lessee agrees to pay when due any and all taxes, assessments or charges levied by any governmental agency on or to the lease -hold premises. 12. Default. Should Lessee fail to pay any monies due pursuant to this lease within three days after written notice from the City or to perform any other obligation required pursuant to the terms of this lease within thirty days after notice from the City, City may immediately cause this lease to be terminated and thereafter take any action and pursue all remedies available under the laws then existent in the State of California. 13. Notice. Any notice required to be made or given pursuant to the provisions of this lease may be either personally served upon the party or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Lessor: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CITY HALL 1315 VALLEY DRIVE HERMOSA BEACH, CA. 90254 Lessee: PROJECT TOUCH 710 Pier Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Julie Feys, Executive Director Any notices so given pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph will be deemed served twenty-four hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail. 14. Attorneys Fees. The parties agree that in the event any action is instituted concerning any of the provisions of this lease agreement, the prevailing party may in the discretion of the court be granted as an additional item of damages its attorneys fees. 15. Assignment and Subletting. Lessee may not sublease all or any portion of the premises without the written consent of the City, which consent may be granted or denied at the exclusive and total discretion of the City. 16. Successors. Subject to prior provisions, this lease is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors of interest of the parties. In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Hermosa Beach Community Center Lease Agreement at Hermosa Beach on the day first herein above set forth. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH a Municipal Corporation, Lessor By Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: LESSEE: 9L utive Director April 28, 1994 Mayor and Members of City Council Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994 Recommendation It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission that the Council 1. Approve priority seating for the AVP Men's Professional Volleyball Tournament on August 26-28, 1994 and; 2. Charge the AVP $4,000 or 25% of the gross admission revenue, whichever is greater, for priority seating. Background At the March 8, 1994 meeting, Council approved a request from the AVP for the 1994 World Championship Tournament. At that meeting, Matt Gage, tour director for the AVP, stated that there was an interest on behalf of the AVP to charge a fee for a limited number of seats close to the center court area. At the April 21, 1994 meeting, the Commission approved the request from the AVP to permit priority seating with the stipulation that the City receive $4,000 or 25% of the gross revenue, which ever is greater, from the priority seating sales. That recommendation exceeded the revenue sharing proposed by the AVP which suggested a 10% gross share with a local charity (Attachment A). Analysis Last year, the AVP made a request directly to the City Council regarding this issue. Council denied this request. Some Council Members expressed that it would not be in the spirit of the intended use of open space to charge admission for an event held on our beach even if it was limited to a portion of the seating. Other Council Members felt that the AVP's proposal for sharing revenues with the City did not provide enough of a benefit to the general fund. 1 1h The argument in favor of charging admission for a portion of the seats carries with it the potential for raising additional funds on behalf of the City and the AVP and adds to the professionalism of the event. The City Attorney reported previously that there would be no legal restrictions concerning charging admission for special events on the beach. Further, the California Coastal Commission has in a memo dated 12/18/92 (Attachment B) stating that a fee may be charged for preferred seating as long as 75% of the provided seating capacity is available free of charge to the general public. Although the approval of the Coastal Commission is important, the final decision to allow this type of activity rests solely with the City. It is noteworthy that the AVP sold priority seats at 14 of the 18 AVP events in 1993, including California events at San Diego, Seal Beach and Manhattan Beach. Of the four (4) non priority seating venues in 1993, three (3) are not on the 1994 schedule. Hermosa Beach is the lone exception. At this time no final price structure has been established by the AVP for the 1994 Tournament. Based on the priority seating chart provided by the AVP there will be 824 seats that may be sold. The estimated potential gross to the AVP would be approximately $20,600. This is based on 100% of the seats being sold at an average cost of $25 per seat. For Council's information, staff has included a document (Attachment A) submitted by the AVP outlining the financial breakdown of priority seating by City from the 1993 tour. Only two (2) venues received a percentage of priority seating revenue last year: Manhattan Beach and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Manhattan Beach received 50% of the net proceeds from priority seating. Milwaukee received 15% of the gross tournament revenue that included not only priority seating but concession sales of T-shirts, sweatshirts and other tournament related items. Even with that, Hermosa Beach was the most expensive stop on the AVP tour in 1993. Other alternatives available to the Council: • Deny priority seating • Increase/reduce percentage of fees charged to the AVP for priority seating • Request additional information Attachments: Attachment A: Attachment B: Letters from Matt Gage regarding priority seating Price Breakdown from AVP Coastal Commission Memo 2 Fiscal Impact: An additional $4,000 to the general fund. Total fiscal impact for tournament estimated at $28,000. Respectfully submitted: John A. Newell Recreation Supervisor 3 Concur: Ma , c�"ooney Director, Com nity Resources Stephe ' R. Burrell City anager Association of Volleyball Professionals 15260 Ventura Boulevard Suite 2250 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 (818) 386-2486 fax (818) 386-2480 To: John Newall From: Matt Gage Date: February 15, 1994 Subject: Priority Seating ATTACHMENT "A" Pursuant to your request, following is an overview of priority seating. Although plans call for general admission ticket sales at nine AVP events in 1994, the AVP request only priority seating ticket sales at Hermosa Beach. Priority Seating Coastal Commission Approval Last year the California Coastal Commission approved the sale of seating on California beaches for events as long as the seats sold did not exceed 25% of the total seats available. As there were approximately 6,500 seats available at the Hermosa Beach tournament in 1993, the Coastal Commission's ruling would have allowed approximately 1,625 seats to be legally sold (Coastal Commission paperwork enclosed). Set -Up Priority seats are those closest to center court. Plans call for the same set-up as implemented at Hermosa Beach in 1993 with the difference being the priority seats would be sold instead of given away. About 75% of the priority seats (approximately 700 seats) are put on risers to assure an excellent view and to enhance the look and ambiance of the event. This set-up is expensive as it is labor intensive and involves high rental fees for the risers. However, the AVP has found the priority seating set-up, due to it's structured nature, markedly enhances the professional look of the event in person and on television and has also significantly improved our ability to direct and control the crowd. (Event lay -out and center court lay -out enclosed). 02/15/94 Page 2 History The AVP sold priority seats at 14 of 18 AVP produced events in 1993 including the following California events: San Diego, Seal Beach and Manhattan Beach. Three of the four non-priority seating events in 1993 are not on the current 1994 schedule (Hermosa Beach being the lone exception) and the AVP would like to include priority seating as an integral part of each of it's 1994 events. The priority seating program has been operationally very successful and has been received very positively. Loyal and enthusiastic fans now have the ability to reserve prime seats ahead of time instead of having to compete for these seats the morning of the event. In addition, these fans get a comfortable seat, a good view and a controlled, orderly environment. Volleyball fans have taken readily to this concept and the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive. Charitable Contribution In an effort to assure there is benefit to the City of Hermosa Beach by virtue of priority seating sales, the AVP will donate 10% of the gross receipts of such sales to a TBD Hermosa Beach charity. Pricing 1993's price structure can be found on the enclosed center court set-up. 1994 pricing has not been established at this time. PRIORITY SEATNG FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 1993 B Myers 110 75 �y Pansano|a 330 225 Phoenix 118 225 653 178 1,477 969 104 304 1,123 819 1,418 4,960 1,992 6,952 1,716 4,541 1,992 6,533 99 1,069 398 953 231 3,093 1,992 5,085 5,560 1,625 9,957 Clearwater 388 150 Austin 258 281 San Antonio 277 375 592 1,069 351 1,108 362 4,020 1,992 6,012 8,040 1,443 (V1.382) ($4,908) $4,872 $585 490 969 304 940 47 504 969 304 858 117 San Diego 600 113 1,219 Boulder 301 900 Cleveland 360 Seaside Chicago 393 87 Manhattan Cape Cod Belmar Milwaukee GrandHuvon --- Seal Beach 338 401 253 272 375 450 1,125 600 750 954 339 45 969 1'0G8 969 1,069 328 300 383 1,051 944 955 78 580 29 3,289 3,404 3,389 4,081 1,992 1,992 1,992 5,281 5,396 5,381 1,992 6,073 4,125 1,992 6,117 3,987 3,085 8,175 11,540 4,452 ($1'2S4) ($2,311) $2,794 $5,467 449 (g2'114) 8 1,294 328 328 90 818 917 1,129 244 3,549 1,992 90 3,140 7,107 124 3,613 6,850 380 1,219 508 1,240 126 4,561 1,992 1,992 1,992 5,541 9,099 8,842 6,553 3,746 9,711 14,566 11,569 <$1.7S6> $612 $5,724 $5,016 1,050 367 969 304 845 104 6,338 10,378 1,992 12,370 12,616 $246 675 600 975 456 1,069 304 505 969304 ----- ---'- ----- O 1,519 200 863 167 3,693 7,480 735 1,067 88 4,504 7,977 160 3,663 7,584 1,992 1,992 1,992 9,472 11,356 9,969 14,195 538 $1,346 724 $3,502 9,576 9,970 $394 Total 4,200 9,431 5,762 18'856 5,142 16'385 5,681 24'961 80'388 33,871 124.259 144'150 3,154 g16'737 ASSOCIATION OF VOLLEYBALL PROFESSIONALS March 22, 1994 Mr. John Newall City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Dear John: 15260 Ventura Boulevard Suite 2250 Sherman Oaks. CA 91403 Tel (818) 386-2486 Fax (818)386-2480 The AVP requests approval to sell priority seating at this year's AVP Pro Beach volleyball Tournament at Hermosa Beach August 26-28, 1994. As you know, the AVP sold such seating at almost all it's 1993 events including San Diego, Seal Beach, and Manhattan Beach in California. Looking forward to this year's schedule, all AVP events with the exception of Hermosa Beach have approved priority seating sales. The AVP has found that the sale of priority seating accomplishes the following: 1) Provides a more professional event set-up and appearance. 2) Provides a safer, more secure environment for fans. 3) Allows fans to reserve specific seating accommodation ahead of time, therefore avoiding the very early morning rush for seating at the event. The AVP, in an effort to assure the City of Hermosa Beach benefits from this program, would like to donate 10% of all gross priority seating sales to a Hermosa Beach charity that will be designated at a later date. John, if I can provide any other information relative to the priority seating program, do not hesitate to ask. Sincerely, Matt Gage Tour Director STATE OF CALIFORNIA -THE RESOURCES AGENCY ATTACHMENT "B" PETE WILSON, Go`emor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION FREMONT, SUITE 2000 FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2219 .�'E AND TDD (415) 904-5200 TO: Commissioners and Interested Parties DATE:12/28/92 FROM: Peter Douglas, Executive Director I6LIP SC Sherilyn Sarb, Chief of Permits, San Diego District SUBJECT: Proposed Guidelines for the Exclusion of Temporary Events from Coastal Commission Coastal Development Permit Review 51 I. Introduction The attached proposed guidelines are to identify the standards the Executive Director shall use in determining whether a temporary event is excluded from coastal development permit requirements pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 30610 (i) (as amended by SB 1578, Ch. 1088, Stats. 1992) which states: Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, no coastal development permit shall be required pursuant to this chapter for the following types of development and in the follcwing areas:... (1)(1) Any proposed development which the executive director finds to be a temporary event which does not have any significant adverse impact upon coastal resources within the meaning of guidelines adopted pursuant to this subdivision by the commission. The commission shall, after public hearing, adopt guidelines to implement this subdivision and to assist local governments and persons planning temporary events in complying with this division by specifying the standards which the Executive Director shall use in determining whether a temporary event is excluded from permit requirements pursuant to this subdivision. The guidelines adopted pursuant to this subdivision are exempt from the review of the Office of Administrative Law and from the requirements of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. (2) Exclusion or waiver from the coastal development permit requirements of this division pursuant to this subdivision does not diminish, waive, or otherwise prevent the commission from asserting and exercising its coastal development permit jurisdiction over any temporary event at any time if the commission determines that the exercise of its jurisdiction is necessary to implement the coastal resource protection policies of Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 30200). II. Staff Recommendation and Summary Staff recommends the Commission adopt the attached guidelines, the effect of which are, to generally require a coastal development permit only for Temporary Events 12/28/92 Page 2 temporary events which are held between Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day, are located on a sandy beach, and for which an admission or seating fee is charged. Such events can be further excluded from permit requirements, at the discretion of the Executive Director, if certain other identified criteria are met. Also, the guidelines give to the Executive Director the discretion to require a coastal development permit if unique circumstances exist which have the potential for significant adverse impacts on coastal resources. The Commission may modify the guidelines at any..time in the future should it be determined such modification is necessary to more effectively implement Section 30610(1). III. Discussion The attached draft guidelines have been revised in response to comments by the Commission and interested persons at the public hearing on November 17, 1992. The criteria to be used to determine when a coastal development permit is required has been narrowed to address only those events which are held during the summer season, occupy a sandy beach and involve an admission or seating charge. The criteria that a parking fee would automatically result in the need for a permit has been eliminated. Additionally, the draft guidelines would allow the Executive Director to exclude from permit requirements events which meet all of the above criteria, if the seating charge is for preferred seating only and 75% of the event's seating capacity remains open to general public use, the sandy beach is in a remote location, or, the event is less than one day in duration. Also, repeat events which have obtained a coastal development permit in the past and are substantially the same event in the same location, can be excluded from permit requirements for subsequent events. Based on discussions with local agencies responsible for issuing permits for special/temporary events, it appears most agencies currently discourage or prohibit events which involve an admission charge for use of a public recreational area or sandy beach, particularly during the summer season. Therefore, utilizing this criteria should result in Commission review of only those types of events which clearly have the potential for adverse effects on public access opportunities during peak use periods. Adoption of such guidelines may also serve as a deterrent to local agencies and/or sponsors of such events from proposing a fee for use of public parkland during the summer season, due to the uncertainty as to whether such a event would be granted a coastal development permit by the Commission. The draft guidelines continue to include Section III. which gives the Executive Director the discretion to assert coastal development permit jurisdiction over any temporary event which could adversely affect public access or sensitive coastal resources. Examples include, but are not Temporary Events 12/28/92 Page 3 necessarily limited to, events proposed adjacent to or within floodplains or wetland areas, or events that involve road or parking lot closures during peak summer season. Section III is necessary due to the nature of temporary events and the fact that it is not possible to anticipate all types of events and associated impacts which may represent a conflict with Coastal Act policies for specific inclusion in these guidelines. The criteria includes sufficient specificity to identify to local governments and promoters what issues may be of concern to the Commission; however, the criteria is general enough to allow the Commission the ability to review permit applications for those new events which have the potential to raise public access concerns and/or potential resource conflicts, and to assert jurisdiction those events which are brought to the Commission's attention, either before of after -the -fact, which result in identifiable problems. Finally, the guidelines, as drafted, do not contain any new procedures for processing exclusions from permit requirements. The exclusions for temporary events. pursuant to these guidelines, will be handled by the individual district offices in much the same way as exemptions from permit requirements are handled currently. There is no provision for reporting exclusions which are granted to the Commission. Temporary Events 12/28/92 Page 4 DRAFT GUIDELINES SUBJECT TO ADOPTION BY THE COMMISSION TO: Local Governments and Interested Persons FROM: Coastal Commission Staff SUBJECT: Proposed Guidelines For the Exclusion of Temporary Events from Coastal Commission Permit Requirements I. Purpose and Authority. The purpose of these proposed guidelines is to identify the standards the Coastal Commission staff, under the direction of the Executive Director, will use in determining whether a temporary event is excluded from coastal development permit requirements pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 30610 (i) (as amended by SB 1578, Ch. 1088, Stets. 1992). The guidelines are for use in areas where the Coastal Commission retains coastal development permit authority. These guidelines may be utilized by local governments for reference in developing Local Coastal Programs or in processing LCP amendments, if required, to address coastal development permit jurisdiction over temporary events. II. Criteria for Exclusion from Permit Requirements. Except as provided in Section III. below, the Executive Director shall exclude from coastal development permit requirements all temporary events except those which meet all of the following criteria: a) Are held between Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day; and, b) Occupy all or a portion of a sandy beach area; and, c) Involve a charge for general public admission or seating where no fee is currently charged for use of the same area (not including booth or entry fees). Only temporary events meeting all of the above criteria shall reouire coastal development permit review, however, The Executive Director may also exclude from permit requirements temporary events meeting all of the above criteria when: d) The fee is for preferred seating only and more than 75% of the provided seating capacity is available free of charge for general public use; or, Temporary Events 12/28/92 Page 5 e) The event is held on sandy beach area in a remote location with minimal demand for public use, and there is no potential for adverse effect on sensitive coastal resources; or, f) The event is less than one day in duration; or, g) The event has previously received a coastal development permit and will be held in the same location, at a similar season, and for the same duration, with operating and environmental conditions substantially the same as those associated with the previously—approved event. III. Executive Director or Commission Discretion to Require a Permit. The Executive Director, or the Commission through direction to the Executive Director, may determine that a temporary event shall be subject to Commission coastal development permit review, even if the criteria in Section III. are met, if the Executive Director or the Commission determines that unique circumstances exist relative to a particular temporary event that have the potential for significant adverse impacts on coastal resources. Such circumstances may include, but are not limited*to, the following: a) The event, either individually or together with other temporary events scheduled before or after the particular event, precludes the general public from use of a public recreational area for a significant period of time; b) The event and its associated activities or access requirements will either directly or indirectly impact environmentally sensitive habitat areas, rare or endangered species, significant scenic resources, or other coastal resources as defined in Section V. of these guidelines; c) The event is scheduled between Memorial Day weekend and Labor Day and would restrict public use of roadways or parking areas or otherwise significantly impact public use or access to coastal waters; d) The event has historically required a coastal development permit to address and monitor associated impacts to coastal resources. IV. Modifications to Guidelines by the Commission. The Commission may amend these guidelines at any time if it is determined such modification is necessary to more effectively implement Section 30610(1) of the Coastal Act, and provide Coastal Commission coastal development permit review of any category of temporary events having the potential for significant impacts to coastal resources; or, eliminate such review of any category of temporary events having no such potential. Temporary Events 12/28/92 Page 6 V. Definitions. For purposes of these guidelines, the following definitions shall apply: a) "Temporary event(s)" means an activity or use that constitutes development as defined in Section 30106 of the Coastal Act; and is an activity or function of limited duration; and involves the placement of non—permanent structures; and/or involves exclusive use of a sandy beach, parkland, filled tidelands, water, streets or parking area which'is otherwise open and available for general public use; b) "Limited duration" means a period of time which does not exceed a two week period on a continual basis, or does not exceed a consecutive four month period on an intermittent basis; c) "Non—permanent structures" include, but are not limited to, bleachers, perimeter fencing, vendor tents/canopies, judging stands, trailers, portable toilets, sound/video equipment, stages, platforms, etc., which do not involve grading or landform alteration for installation. d) "Exclusive use" means a use that precludes use in the area of the event for public recreation, beach access or access to coastal waters other than for or through the event itself. e) "Coastal resources" include, but are not limited to, public access opportunities, visitor and recreational facilities, water—oriented activities, marine resources, biological resources, environmentally sensitive habitat areas, agricultural lands, and archaeological or paleontological resources. f) "Sandy beach area" includes publicly owned and privately owned sandy areas fronting on coastal waters, regardless of the existence of potential prescriptive rights or a public trust interest. (8052A) STATE OF. CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Go.emor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION ' DIEGO COAST AREA ' CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 . DIEGO, CA 92108-1725 (619) 521-8036 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Tuesday, January 12, 1993 TIME: 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Guest Quarters Suite Hotel 1707 Fourth Street Santa Monica, CA The proposed guidelines for Coastal Commission implementation of new authority to exclude from coastal development permit jurisdiction certain temporary events pursuant to Section 30610(1) of the Coastal Act (as amended by SB 1578, Ch. 1088, Stats. 1992) This item has been tentatively scheduled'as follows: Administrative Permit Consent Calendar Extension Request Adoption of Findings Request for Reconsideration Material Amendment Hearing and Voting on Regular Calendar SEE NOTE ON PAGE 2 Continued Hearing and Voting on Regular Calendar Public Hearing on Regular Calendar Substantial Issue Determination and Hearing and Voting on Appeals from Local Government Decisions Continued Hearing and Voting on Appeals from Local Government Decisions X Executive Director's Report — Public Hearing and Possible Action If, after reading this information and the project description above, you have questions, please contact Sherilyn Sarb at the Commission's San Diego District Office at (619) 521-8036. The staff report is available and will be mailed to you upon request. May 1, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994 JRI`All" Recommendation: It is recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff that Council approve the request from the Women's Professional Volleyball Association (WPVA) to hold a professional beach volleyball tournament on the Pier courts on June 17, 18 and 19th, 1994 with: • Permit fees of $1,789.70 per day; • Charges of $200 per day for set-up and tear down days; • Charges for all direct City costs associated with the tournament; and • The terms and conditions as listed in the contract (Attachment A). Background: The Community Resources Department received a special event permit application (Attachment B) from the Women's Professional volleyball Association (WPVA) for a June 17, 18, and 19th tournament. The WPVA is requesting approval for their 6th annual tournament in Hermosa Beach. As determined by the Commission's Special Event Policy (Attachment C) this would be classified a Category II event. In line with this policy, the fee of $1,627 set by the City's Commercial Event Ordinance is increased by 10% per day and event organizers are charged a $200 per day fee for each set up and tear down day. The Chamber of Commerce has also put in a request to the Council to have a street fair event on the Sunday of the volleyball tournament. Per the Council's recent action, this activity requires review by the Downtown Enhancement Commission prior to a Council approval. This item will be on the Commission's agenda on May 18, 1994 and on the June 14, 1994 City Council agenda. Analysis: The WPVA has a well-established history of successful tournaments in the City without any notable negative incidents. They have been responsible and responsive event planners and have abided by all City regulations. The event has been growing each year with attendance of approximately 4,000 per day. 1 1 a Clearly this event represents the best of its kind and if approved, will keep Hermosa Beach on the map as an elite venue for women's tournaments of this caliber. Projected Fiscal Impact: Revenue to the General Fund Permit Fees: Police Fees: Film Permit Banner Permit: Co -Sponsors: Sound Permit: $5,796.10 $2,868.75 (estimated) $ 759.25 $ 200.75 $ 500.00 $ 38.00 TOTAL FEES: $10,162.85 Other Alternatives available to Council: 1. Deny request 2. Request more information ATTACHMENTS: A : WPVA Event Contract B: Women 's Professional Volleyball Association Special Event Permit Application C: Fee Policy Respectfully submitted, John A. Newell Recreation Supervisor 2 Concur: Mai Airooney, Director Community Resources Dept. Stephen/R. Burrell City Manager ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH COMMERCIAL BEACH EVENT(S) CONTRACT This contract is entered into on May 10, 1994, at Hermosa Beach, California by and between Women's Professional Volleyball Association (WPVA) a Sporting Events Promoter, and the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH (CITY), with regard to the WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT ON JUNE 17, 18, and 19th, 1994. FEES Event fee shall be $10,162.85. The $500 deposit will be applied toward the $10,162.85 permit fee and will be refunded only if the permit request is denied by the City. All predetermined costs fees shall be paid two weeks prior to the Tournament. All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of he event shall be paid within 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. SECURITY The City of Hermosa Beach shall establish a command post in the immediate vicinity of the Tournament. The command post shall be staffed at all times with one representative of the Hermosa Beach Police Department and one representative of WPVA. WPVA shall provide no less than six security officers. Said officers shall wear identifiable uniforms that indicate a separate identity from other Tournament staff A representative of the security staff shall meet with the Hermosa Beach Police Department Watch Commander prior to the Tournament for a pre -event briefing. The private security staff shall be responsible primarily for informing spectators of the City's alcohol ordinance. The City of Hermosa Beach shall provide Officers for the event as follows for each day of Tournament, 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM: 1. Sergeant 2. Officers or as many officers as deemed necessary by Public Safety Director. Cost of officers shall be assumed by WPVA CLEAN -UP WPVA shall provide a professional maintenance service to clean the following areas each day of the Tournament: The Beach and Strand , from 8th. Street to 15th. St. Pier Avenue, from Strand to Monterey Avenue. The maintenance service shall be responsible for hauling the trash collected outside the City each day of the Tournament. All maintenance work is to be concluded by 8:00 PM each evening. WPVA shall provide additional trash receptacles at the following locations: Beach (impacted area) Strand (impacted area) or additional trash receptacles as needed. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BEACHES AND HARBORS SERVICES WPVA shall assume all costs for any additional lifeguards each day of Tournament if required by Los Angeles County Lifeguards. INSURANCE WPVA shall , not later than 30 days prior to the event, provide the City a Certificate of Insurance providing personal injury and property damage liability insurance naming the CITY, and County of Los Angeles, their officer, employees and agents as additional insured with minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage. Said insurance shall not be canceled or altered without 30 day notice in writing to the City and County. WPVA insurers shall be primarily responsible for any and all liability resulting or arising from the performance of the contract and CITY and County and their insurers shall not be required to contribute. WPVA agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY and County of Los Angeles harmless from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs and legal fees, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of the event promotion firm/sponsor its agents, officers and employees, including but not limited to, personal injury, bodily injury, death and property damage. CO-SPONSORS A fee of $100 each shall be charged for all co-sponsors with each co-sponsor permitted one display booth. All co-sponsors must meet with CITY approval prior to event. ADVERTISING Signage regarding the CITY's alcohol ordinance shall be required by WPVA . City staff shall determine criteria for size, wording and locations for posting. City of Hermosa Beach shall permit two street banners to be posted for Tournament. Cost of installation shall be the responsibility of WPVA. CITY shall permit WPVA to display two large replicas of their product. City staff shall have final approval of said replicas and determine location. WPVA shall be required to make announcements informing spectators of the CITY's alcoholic beverage ordinance as deemed necessary by Hermosa Beach Police. All sponsor signs, props, product facsimiles, etc. deemed necessary by WPVA to identify the event, shall be approved as to location and content by CITY. CITY will not unnecessarily deny said approval and will not curtail certain constitutional rights of the WPVA. PARKING WPVA shall be required to make announcements indicating 1) where there is free parking; and 2) that the CITY will strictly enforce all traffic and parking regulations. WPVA will be allowed to park one "working" truck on the pier head. No other vehicles shall be parked on pier, pierhead or Strand without permission of CITY. SPECIAL EVENTS The CITY shall review all requests for any special events requested to be held as part of the Tournament. The CITY shall have the right to deny all requests. MISCELLANEOUS CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The CITY shall make any necessary contracts on behalf of the event with the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors. If WPVA desires any County services, they must process their request through the CITY. Any costs for County services will be borne by WPVA. The CITY shall allow access to Tournament site for set-up forty eight (48) hours prior to Tournament. The CITY shall reserve the end of Pier Avenue, Beach Drive to the Strand for Tournament staff and film equipment parking. At no time may WPVA block emergency vehicle access. Parking privileges may be revoked at anytime by the CITY. Contractor shall provide the CITY with evidence that the bleacher construction and or assembly company is currently certified by the State of California. City staff shall inspect grandstand construction and authorize public access. The CITY shall allow WPVA the opportunity to sell official WPVA concession items per certain conditions. No food or beverage concessions shall be permitted. All concession items must be approved by CITY prior to event. THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH RETAINS THE RIGHT TO AMEND, ADD OR DELETE ANY CONDITION(S) OF SAID CONTRACT. MISCELLANEOUS WPVA RESPONSIBILITIES WPVA shall provide as many portable toilets as determined necessary by City staff. WPVA shall designate area for spectators to store alcoholic beverages. WPVA shall be responsible for all prize money, equipment, sound system and necessary personnel for conducting said Tournament. Event shall be conducted in compliance with City of Hermosa Beach Noise Ordinances. Ordinances are on file at the Department of Community Resources. WPVA shall take the necessary steps to encourage participants and require sponsors to utilize recycling bins for appropriate materials. WPVA shall make arrangements to provide such bins. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH Mayor Date City Attorney Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES Director Date WOMEN'S PROFESSIONAL VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION Director of Operation Date Hermosa Beach City Clerk Date ATTACHMENT "B" City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 FAX (310) 372-6186 Special Event Permit Application Organization's Name: \do ei1'S en-ressloo 61_1.V1Ieb lebiz I 1.6506 ct-t " Profit Non-profit Non-profit ID ) MP3 71D Sr1-1 Address: 1130 C, h & re e+ City: Sarl-frik, MO n I Ca, State CZIP 61°L465 Phone: 3 / 0 39 4o`I 0 FAX 3/0 3�1Z_ t I I Contact Person/Title Ola rs. ha_ (I e,%, - EV e C00 rd 1 it OdT)r Address: � � ?J 0 061 h-t-ree- City: `JGt, r' r1 Ort I e_d i State Ca- ZIP (4014aID Day Phone: tO Li 2 i D Eve Phone 01'5 01061-56,q5 X10 z- ��II 47-x Brief description of event: I UVQ day\ wcy- eii IS a-/ S ac,h \to I Ie Lit (I -17)Ltn' t, F(1-- e ` crs n double._ e l i rro_axtC 'I of ma f ) b ;1 evi G6'61) films a_ �� i ie -no. l 00)0lz l\kvc 32- a 11.E �� I � �} 5 ,� � YVl � e-�rl� � T 1�Y ,� �r �''Y10 r'1 �-- `J J C' --P119 COO. D� ZJ Dates of Event: c 1Y 117 --161 100'1 Location of Event: -E?xh' X09.; 111 4h Pr - Setup Time: 14Plirdd a t/N, I'ie- ( pm Time Event will be61:2-1aCt (itiLOOKI 4"Time event will end: 7' A.. • Number of Participants (including volunteers): Anticipated number of spectators: I/O (pIaer51,cre&) ( 0 0 - 7 500 Number of Vehicles: (3-) 2. lieuck3 i7cir5d - Stelticia 60D auDmdbi Ies -o) -�a Qo 0)C aw'�cl�. Description of Set up for this event / ( i f- 17L ar&L 0)11-11/1 5b—iii e eour- S'fo s6tir 1/l//a /rIale d � /0 X10 -t "rfE flaiers,, mimed -,ur atIrec71s f rned/?c, l/iP and 50-FFferry -11/ due a bleete, from/rate?, /O d , J/'IS Q.h c( Addtional information or requests: KJ e•d e -f U ---N(xjaz— i-t;dat) - (if am-frnif �f i 0-?61o� va l��in C 1�o�1r�� . a �fd\I 1)(4th i amol C/inctic, — � � flQ aid Ur` t dew() . ee e( %(✓lr'1 ror etiet-rt-, FEES. CHARGES, AND OTTER REQUIREMENTS Police Fire Business License Public Works Processing Fee Other Costs TOTAL DUE Insurance Required : YES NO Unless greater or lessor converage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa Beach. evidence of $1 minion comprehensive general liablity insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City ofHermosa Beach and its employees as additional insured. Permittee wavies cLxims against the City of Hermosa BEach, its officers, agents, and employees, for fees or damages caused, arising out of or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICANTS LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND RETURN SAID PERMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CONS1UN IY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTYH PARTIES. si71(16b, 7)Lizz,x) b'//g/F Company Representative Date Permit to be processed throuzh City Council YES NO Department of Communiry Resources Date Police Department Date Ere Department Date Cross ltIl1PMarkel Proclucl;on *17111[VIATR. Commercial EMIT Categories ana t riterla For Event Fees Attachment "C" CATEGORY I: MODERATE IMPACT FEE: Daily Minimum of $1,627. A Category I event meets the criteria of a commercial event and : • Impacts public areas for no longer than one (1) day including set-up. • Is conducted in the off season (not between Memorial Day and Labor Day or any holiday) • Participant/Spectator crowds do not exceed 3,000 • Has no television coverage (except news) • A non-profit entity is the beneficiary of the net revenues (100%) • Does not meet and identifying criteria for Category II or III events CATEGORY II: MEDIUM IMPACT FEE: Daily Minimum + 10% plus a $200 set-up and tear -down fee per day. A Category II event meets the criteria of a commercial event and does not qualify as a Category I event: • Impacts public areas for more that one (1) day including set up • Has television coverage • Has more than $3,000 and less than $50,000 in prize money • Does not meet any of the identining criteria for a Category III event CATEGORY III: HIGH LIIPACT FEE: Daily minimum + 100% and a S200 set-up and tear -down fee per day and a (if applicable) percentage of gross admission revenues. A Category III event meets the criteria for a commercial event and has one or more of the following: • Has network television coverage • Estimated participantlspectator crowds exceed 5,000 • Prize money in excess of $50.000 • Charges admission to spectators • Gross revenues in excess of S50.000 Approved by Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Commission November 16. 1993 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lindsay L. Hirsh, Planning Aide SUBJECT: Proposition A Fund Exchange DATE: April 29, 1994 The City of West Hollywood is willing to exchange $102,000 of general funds for $170,000 worth of Proposition A funds, at a rate of $60¢/$1.00. Recommendation Staff recommends exchanging $170,000 of Proposition A funding for $102,000 of general funds. CONCUR: Michael Schubach Planning Director Stephen ' .: rrell City Manager lh:memo 1 NOTED FOR FISCAL IMPACT: Viki Copeland Finance Director Finance Director Note: An exchange rate of 53c was assumed for budget purposes. Planning Department efforts resulted in a rate of 60c, or an additional $12,000 for the General Fund. 1j 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF $170,000 IN PROPOSITION A TRANSIT FUNDS IN EXCHANGE FOR $102,000 IN GENERAL FUNDS FROM THE CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD. WHEREAS, the City has financed all of its current transit programs for the fiscal year 1993-1994 and made the following findings: A. The surplus funds to be transferred will be lost if not utilized within the allocated time; and B. The City of West Hollywood has agreed to exchange $102,000 in General funds for $170,000 in Proposition A transit funds from the City of Hermosa Beach; and C. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority has granted permission for the exchange of funds; and D. The proposed budget for 1993-1994 will not be in balance if this exchange is not consummated. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, the following: 1. The City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement with the City of West Hollywood for the exchange of Proposition A transit funds, amounting to exactly $170,000 for $102,000 in General funds from the City of West Hollywood. 2. The City Manager of Hermosa Beach is authorized to execute and file any other document required by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. 3. The City Manager is authorized to furnish such additional information as the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority may require. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney ?ice 1 ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT This Assignment Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 1994, by and between the City of Hermosa Beach, California and the City of West Hollywood, California with respect to the following facts: A. The City of West Hollywood proposes to provide a community shuttle and taxi jitney service to serve people with disabilities and the general public. Given the grave traffic congestion and parking problems of the City, West Hollywood is committed to reducing auto dependency by providing alternative modes of transportation. Adequate Proposition A Local Return funding for such a service is not available given the limited amount of West Hollywood's Local Return allocation and the needs of other priority transit projects in the City. B. Hermosa Beach has uncommitted funding authority for its Fiscal Year 1993-94 allocation of Proposition A Local Return funds which could be made available to West Hollywood to assist in providing the services discussed in Paragraph A of this Agreement. In exchange for the assignment by West Hollywood of the amount of its general funds indicated in Section 1 below, Hermosa Beach is willing to assign uncommitted Proposition A Local Return funding to West Hollywood for the purpose identified in Paragraph A. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the parties and of the premises herein contained, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. Exchange Hermosa Beach agrees to assign $170,000 of its Fiscal Year 1993-94 Proposition A Local Return funding authority to West Hollywood. In return, West Hollywood agrees to assign $102,000 of its general funds to Hermosa Beach. 2. Consideration Hermosa Beach shall assign the agreed upon Proposition A Local Return funds to West Hollywood in one lump sum payment. West Hollywood shall assign the agreed upon general funds to Hermosa Beach in one lump sum payment. The lump sum payments shall be due and payable within ten (10) days of approval by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) of the project described in Paragraph A. Before the effective date of this Agreement the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority shall approve West Hollywood's project description covering the services discussed in Paragraph A. 3. Term This Agreement is effective on the date above written and for such time as is necessary for both parties to complete their mutual obligations under this Agreement. 4. Termination Termination of this Agreement may be made by either party before the date of approval of the project description covering the funds in question by the MTA so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to the other party at least five (5) days prior to the termination. 5. Notice Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: a. Stephen R. Burrell, City Manager City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 b. Paul Brotzman, City Manager City of West Hollywood 8611 Santa Monica Boulevard West Hollywood, CA 90069 6. Assurance A. West Hollywood shall use the assigned Proposition A Local Return funds only for the purpose of providing the services discussed in Paragraph A of this Agreement and within the time limits specified in MTA's Proposition A Local Return Program Guidelines. B. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, West Hollywood shall provide MTA with the Standard Assurances and Understandings Regarding Receipt and Use of Proposition A funds specified in the Guidelines regarding the use of the assigned Proposition A Local Return funds. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Assignment Agreement to be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized, on the day and year above written. CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BY BY ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk City Clerk h:fundchng April 26, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994 REQUEST`FROM_ THE HERMOSA BEACHED:UCATION FOUNDATION' HOLD;.BAYOU BASH FUND::RAISER OR::. LARK:FIELD.. Recommendation The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and staff recommend that Council approve the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation (HBEF) fund-raiser scheduled for Sunday, June 12, 1994 subject to the fees and conditions as listed in the analysis below. Background Staff received a letter from the HBEF requesting approval to hold their fund- raiser on Clark Field, Sunday, June 12, 1994 (Attachments A- C). At their April 21, 1994 meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission approved the event subject to conditions and fees as listed in the analysis. All net proceeds collected for the event will benefit the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation. According to the Municipal Code, Section 22-5.2, all Hermosa based non-profit organizations shall be exempt from paying the Special Event fees of $1.10 per participant (Attachment D). Analysis Event Approval The HBEF held their last "Bayou Bash" in the Clark Building, in September of 1993. This event proved to be successful with 300 people in attendance. The organization has been responsible for a variety of events held in the City and has always complied with requests of City personnel. The HBEF fund-raiser will begin at 12:00 Noon and end at 6:00 PM the same day. The hours of this event will not conflict with any other City event or building rental. The fund-raiser should not unduly disrupt the activities of the surrounding residents since the event will be over before dark at 6:00 PM. 1 ik The Commission approved the Hermosa Beach Education Foundation "Bayou Bash" fund-raiser for Clark Field, on June 12, 1994, subject to the following special conditions: • The entire area of the event, marked off with cones and tape, will allow one entrance and exit for all participants. • HBEF must obtain ABC alcohol permit for sale of beer in Clark Building. • Supply the event with four (4) internal security volunteers in addition to the Hermosa Beach Police Officers. • Furnish the City of Hermosa Beach with a certificate of insurance covering comprehensive and general liability in the amount of $2 million dollars naming the City and its employees as additional insured. • HBEF is responsible for pick-up and removal of all debris from the event and transporting all debris to a location outside the City. • HBEF is responsible for any or all damages to the Clark Field and Building. • A representative from the HBEF, Community Resources Department and Public Works Department will all be present to do a walk-through of the designated event site to verify the condition before and after the event. • All unanticipated costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event, paid with in 15 days of receiving an invoice from the City. • HBEF to notify surrounding residents at least two weeks before the event. • Alcohol prohibited on Clark Field. • Mark off the softball diamond on the NE corner of the Clark Field and protect it from the actual event site. • Vehicles restricted to paved areas only. • HBEF will comply with any additional conditions deemed necessary by City staff. Fees Per the Commission recommendation, the HBEF will pay $300 for the use of Clark Field. This fee will cover all administrative costs used for the preparation, set-up, and monitoring of the event. Additionally, they will be charged for staff fees and direct costs as noted below. The Commission waived rental fees for the use of Clark Building and all maintenance fees and deposits. B) Clark Field fees C) Staff fees D) Police fees (2 officers) E) Amplified music permit $300.00 $ 60.00 $717.00 $ 38.00 Total Fiscal Impact: $1,115.00. 2 The volunteer efforts of the Education Foundation have provided Hermosa Beach Schools with a source of funding that supplements State allocations. It is clear that the involvement of parents and the community in supporting these kind of efforts are crucial to retaining the exemplary programs our schools have. The existence of the Education Foundation and their success is of great benefit to the District and City alike. Hopefully, this fund-raiser will further the objectives of this important organization. Other alternatives available to the Council include: 1. Waive Clark Field Fees. 2. Amend conditions of event. 3. Do not approve event. 4. Request more information. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Special Event Permit Application Attachment B: Rental Application Attachment C: Hermosa Beach Education Foundation fee waiver request Attachment D: H.B. Municipal Code, Sections 22-5.1 and 22-5.2 ectfully submitted, Lisa Newsom Recreation Supervisor Concur: M •looney, Director mu ity Resources Dept. / /I' 1 Step en. Burrell City Manager 3 ATTACHMENT "A" City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 FAX (310) 372-6186 Special Event Permit Application Organi7ltion's Name: l/e=rnr0}A' flj24c 4 6,44, v2-, Profit Non-profit ✓ Non-profit ID 3 305 2-2-2-- 7`3 Address: P. - 13o x �� y City:l�ttr�S.3't' �� State CA . ZIP 11025 ' y C/c>) Phone: 47/ — /7?5 FAX Contact Person/Title Sit 5.i -C. 6//-G,4K Address: g/ '( City: /-(t)61/ ?Sf4- f'.:4c- Day Phone:0 7Y State 64- ZIP Eve Phone 00) 3 7Y— cF7 y Brief description of event: Oct 4 c(cfd r t �+ h V 4 t S ►� i„� , -{-�� 6 -eve✓ - 5 -4- 64tcc S� Dates of Event: L - /2 — Location of Event: C /4.v" t,. Set up Time: efr___ Time Event will bein: / Time event will end: 6/0<..-. Number of Participants (including volunteers): Anticipated number of spectators: Number of Vehicles: 3u -y /2 - Description of Set up for this event cvj6k/h �t Se.-v,`","�P� i2( 5, 'c /, S 4t -k /-rE"-4 Addtional information or requests: FEES, CHARGES, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS Police Fire Business License Public Works Processing Fee Other Costs TOTAL DUE Insurance Required : YES K NO Unless greater or lessor converage is requested, applicant agrees to furnish the City of Hermosa Beach evidence of S1 million comprehensive general liablity insurance in the form of a certificate, covering the entire period of this permit, naming the City ofHermosa Beach and its employees as additional insured. Permittee wavies clnims against the City of Hermosa BEach, its officers, agents, and employees, for fees or damages caused, arising out o or in any way connected with the exercise of this permit. APPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICANTS LAWS AND TO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND RETURN SAID PERMISES IN THE SAME CONDITION AS THEY WERE BEFORE SAID USE. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERIN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ALL FEES, CHARGES AND OTHER MATERIAL WILL BE PAID AND OR FURNISHED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES AS MUTUALLY AGREED TO BY BOTYH PARTIES. FDARE/L., I1”y Company Representative Date Permit to be processed through City Council YES )(' NO Department of Community Resources Date Police Department Date Fire Department Date ATTACHMENT "B" CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES 710 PIER AVENUE, HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 (310) 318-0280 RENTAL APPLICATION Individual's or Organization's Name: g i' c 5 4- be4C 4 G ivt111 c4--, -Gni, Non-profit: YES NO Non -Profit I.D. Number 3 3 CJ Z,2-2- Address: ZZAddress: P. C% . /1,)x q weyn-toS .5e4G A (4 . Zip Code 90L'6/ 3�Z —/ 7eS 37L /7 8-S Phone Numbers: Day (3 /o9 3'Y Evening i`�� Contact Person's Name: St( SA-6l/-eG4 Address: Gll Ct /5f' P/4(C /71(Y, ;t )4- /3'.4c (4 - Phone Numbers: Day 37 V — ' Zip Code 9:025-4/ Evening 3 7'— 7yV Brief Description of Event: C'1•1 4 v- -nc-t r/-; Sc PA -.4 T3N ver, S ÷ S c Facility Requested: (/-/r 5-�-�-c Iu Date and Time Requested: Day of Week Date Hours Scik7 614-y 67/// — 67-2— Set-up Time (Date;Hours): 62-/C67 0F7riY, — /L 7 -7 / -z -- r Will alcohol y -e S and food )'S be served? Will there be amplified music N/� 5 ? Contact Evelyn at the Hermosa Beach Police Dept. to obttin amplified permit (318-0301) A copy of the permit must be on file at the Community Center office. Music must be turn off at 11:00 p.m. Number of people expected? Average age? 3� Charges: Set-up Time $10/hr x (1 hrs. $ 6D Rent per Hour $ x U/ hrs $ /Sv Maintenance Fee $ *Staff Fees $10/hr x hrs $ Balance $ Non -Refundable Deposit $ fv0 Refundable Damage Deposit $ /Uv Balance Due $ 6/7J *City Staff is required to be present at all Parties and Wedding Receptions at the Clark Building. Fees are due on or before: Special instructions/equipment needed: PLEASE NOTE, THAT THE FACILITY DOORS WILL BE OPENED ONLY IF PAYMENT IS RECEIVED TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO THE EVENT. I IL-1 VE READ AJVD AGREE TO THE ATTACHED RENTAL POLICY AND LIST ! ' U S. C � /14-fe lL I j / cr,q Signatur- (Of Apjlicant Date Approved by: Department Signature Date Insurance Required: YES Certificate of Insurance Received: Date Revised November, 1993 NO April 1, 1994 ATTACHMENT "C" HERMOSA Mary Rooney, Director BEACH Hermosa Beach Community Resources Department EDUCATION 710 Pier Avnue FOUNDATION Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Re: The waiving of the following fees for our June 12, 1994 Bayou Bash Fundraising Event. (a) Per participant Entry Fee (h) Clark Building* Rental Fee (c) Clark Field Rental Fee. ' Dear Mary: The Hermosa Beach Education Foundation would like to request that the City of Hermosa Beach waive the above fees. As mentioned in the cover letter, the HBEF is a relatively new ornniration and therefore, needs as much financial assistance as possible. We would he happy to answer any questions at the next Hermosa Beach Parks. Recreation and Community Resources Commission mcetin i. Should you have any questions or comments regarding our request, please call our Bayou Bash chairperson, Susan and Collector at 374-8144. Rick Learned Chief Financial Officer Hermosa Beach Education Foundation F.O. BOX 864, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90254, (310) 372-1785 1' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 13 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 • 27 23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA CREATING AND ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL EVENT PERt•1IT POLICY. • WHEREAS, discussions regarding the establishment of a Special Event Permit Policy were held by the Community Resources Commission on November 17 and December 15, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Council in order to assure public order and tranquility within the City's outdoor facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council does strive to equitably administer major events held in the City's outdoor public 'facilities; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That a new section, 22-5 "Special Event Permit Policy" shall be added to Chapter 22 of the City Code entitled "Parks, Play- grounds and Public Property. The Special Event Permit Policy shall read as follows: "Section 22-5. Permits shall be required for any commercial or non- profit group requesting use of any outdoor public facility within the City of Hermosa Beach; and, Park Permits for residents are recommended. Section 22-5.1. Any Commercial or Non-profit organization charging an entry fee to participants or any group with commercial sponsors with the intent to sell or advertise shall pay the following permit fees: Commercial: $2 per recistered participant Non -Profit: SI per recistered participant Section 22-5. 11 Hermosa Beach based non-profit organizations shall be exempt from paying permit fees. However, ALL direct costs in- curred by the City on behalf of the organization will be the responsibility of the organization. May 2, 1994 HONORABLE MAYOR and MEMBERS of the Regular Meeting of HERMOSA BEACH CITY COUNCIL May 10, 1994 SUBJECT: FINAL MAP #22601 (C.U.P. CON NO. 92-7 & PDP NO. 92-7) LOCATION: 316 26TH STREET APPLICANT(S): DANA IRELAND AND PAIGE V. IRELAND REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR A 2 - UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Final Parcel Map #22601 which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and recommends the City Clerk be directed to endorse the certificate for said map. Background The Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a two unit condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map #22601 at their August 4, 1992 meeting. Analysis The staff has reviewed the Final Map and found it substantially consistent with the vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. Michael Schubach Planning Director y/finmap Respectfully submitted, en Robertson Associate Planner 11 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP #22601 FOR A TWO -UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 316 26TH STREET, HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on May 10, 1994 and made the following Findings: A. This project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act; B. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code, or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code; C. The development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject division of land will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility rights-of-way and/or easements within the subject division of land; D. The approval of said map is subject to all conditions outlined in Planning Commission Resolution P.C. No. 92-47 adopted after hearing on August 4, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning Commission to the recommendation of the County Engineer, the City Council does hereby grant final approval of Parcel Map #22601 in the City of Hermosa Beach, State of California, being a Subdivision of Lot 6, Block 111, Shakespeare Tract, as recorded in Book 9, Page 190 of Maps in the Off ice of the Recorder of Los Angeles County, and that portion of twenty-six court, vacated by the City of Hermosa Beach by Resolution No. 1134, adopted January 16, 1940, for a two -unit condominium project on land commonly known as 316 26th Street, Hermosa Beach, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON. Director April 21, 1994 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS The City Council City of Hermosa Beach 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-0299 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA. CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: `H R/ D APR 2 5 1994 DEPT. ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O.BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA. CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO ALE. B-10 Dear Council Members: PARCEL MAP NO. 22601 As the City Engineer, I have checked the subject map and determined it is ready for your approval. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR COUNCIL: 1. Approve the map. 2. Make findings as follows: a. That this project will not violate any of the provisions of Sections 66427.1, 66474, 66474.1, and 66474.6 of the Subdivision Map Act. b. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan required by Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Government Code. 3. Instruct the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map of Parcel Map No. 22601 the certificate which embodies the approval of said map. Please return the signed original tracing to the Subdivision Section, Building and Safety/Land Development Division, Department of Public Works, for processing and filing with the Registrar/Recorder of the County of Los Angeles. Very truly y r HARRY W. STONE City Engineer MGR:cme A:\PM22601 Enc. May 3, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994 AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE>SIERRASYSTEMS SOFTWARE 11\ im Recommendation It is recommended by staff that Council authorize the purchase of Sierra Systems Software as previously approved (February 22, 1994) with the amended condition requiring a fee payment of $5,000 if the City requires the use of the source code. Background At the February 22, 1994 meeting, Council approved the purchase of $146,000 for software and equipment purchases for the new computer network (Attachment A). Per Council direction, staff has requested access to the software source codes from all of the approved vendors including Sierra Systems. Analysis Of the four (4) approved packages, three (3) agreed to provide the City with source codes for the same price as originally quoted for the software. Sierra Systems agreed to supply the City with the source code with the condition that the City would pay $5,000 should we make that request. (The City will not need the source code unless Sierra Systems goes out of business.) Sierra Systems cited difficulties with other agreements as the reason they were not able to provide the code without a charge to the City. While this represents only a potential cost to the City, staff felt the issue warranted Council review due to the fact that there is a new condition of the purchase. Even with the possible future expenditure of $5,000, Sierra Systems remains the most cost effective and best software choice for our geo-base systems. Due to imposition of the additional fee, staff researched an alternative software package (TideMark) which does not provide the City with all of the features that Sierra Systems does. Furthermore, it costs over $5,000 more initially with double the annual maintenance fees of Sierra. With that in mind, Sierra Systems software remains the most logical choice for the City from all standpoints. With Council's approval, staff will arrange for an installation within the conversion timeline. 1 im t Fiscal Impact: None additional to original approval of $27,453. Potential of $5,000 expenditure in a future year. ATTACHMENT: A: February 22, 1994 Council agenda item: "Computer Software and Parking Enforcement Hardware Purchases: PC Network" Respectfully Submitted, M oney Ass stant City Manager Concur: Stephen R. Bu '' e11 City Manager;/ 2 Noted for Fiscal Impact: V i Copela 'd, Director Finance Dept. January 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council ATTACHMENT ."A" Regular Meeting of February 22, 1994 COMPUTER SOFTWARE & PARKING ENFORCEMENT HARDWARE PURCHASES: PC NETWORK Recommendation It is recommended by the Data Processing Subcommittee and staff that Council 1. approve an expenditure of up to $146,000 for software and hardware purchases to be used with the new Local Area Computer Network System which will require an appropriation of $54,315 from the Prospective Expenditure Account to Data Processing; and 2. authorize the City Manager to sign license agreements with the companies shown on Attachments A & B. Background At the December 14, 1993 meeting, City Council awarded bids for hardware and basic software to initiate the transition from the HP 3000 to a LANS computer system. Since that time, the Data Processing Technician has been installing new computers on a weekly basis to prepare the City for system conversion. Although the new computers are installed and are already operating with basic word processing and other "off-the-shelf' software packages (i.e., Word Perfect 6.0, Lotus 1,2,3), in order to satisfy the primary objective of eliminating the use and maintenance of the HP 3000, all of the functions currently served by that system need to be replaced with micro -based software packages. Analysis SOFTWARE Table A shows the recommended software purchases. These items were selected by staff after an extensive evaluation of current uses on the HP and of available municipal software programs and prices. Efforts were made to purchase basic programs that would enable the City to "cut -the - cord" on the HP 3000 as a first phase in the data processing conversion. In addition. care was taken select software that will allow for potential future growth in the system (ie., once recodified, the Municipal Code can be stored on disk and revised on an ongoing. basis with the CodeMaster program and the new Geo -base system provides the framework for a mapping feature add-on). The new software will greatly enhance City staff computer operations by adding functions and system capabilities including bringing payroll processing in-house; automated investment tracking and interest calculations; personnel management reports and building permit functions; and improved report generation and integration on all fronts. Furthermore, there will be an immediate cost savings of $20,000 annually (support costs) once the City disconnects the HP system. PARKING ENFORCEMENT HARDWARE/SOFTWARE The City has been dissatisfied with the performance of the Clancy parking citation writers (the City has used this system since 1991). The handheld citation writers have proven to be undependable and the accompanying Phoenix Group software is not designed for use on a PC system and does not provide features offered by the new vendor. Attachment B compares the cost of the recommended citation writers and software program from Data Ticket to the current system. In addition to providing a network compatible software package, this system includes citation writers that are a significant upgrade from the Clancy writers used now. The City will purchase the writers (not lease) which are reported to have an estimated life of over ten (10) years. Parking Enforcement Officers note that the new writers will provide them with much greater efficiency than is currently provided by the Clancy handhelds. It is notable that the parking enforcement software and hardware represent a substantial portion of the cost of the conversion ($44, 634), however, the original investment from the recommended software and hardware purchases will be more than amortized over the next three (3) Fiscal Years with subsequent annual cost savings of $28,000. COSTS Although staff did research and compare alternative providers for each software/hardware item, sole source purchasing will be used due to the fact that each package has specialized features and can only be purchased from a single vendor. The City Attomey has indicated that these purchases fall appropriately into the sole source category. 2 Fiscal Impact: Total request: $146,000 (includes 5% contingency ). Currently there is $91,685 in the Data Processing Budget for software purchases. Request allocation of $54,315 from the Prospective Expenditure Account leaving a balance of $38,287 in the fund. Once the City's initial investment is amortized, there will be an estimated cost savings of $48,000 annually with the elimination of the HP 3000 system and conversion to these new programs. This does not account for the general fund savings already realized from the downsizing of the Data Processing Division from two (2) employees to one (1) and from the elimination and/or reduction of some of the support services associated with the HP 3000 instituted previously. Once approved, the preliminary timeline calls for a July 1, 1994 total installation date. That is, the system will be fully converted and all software installed on the network which will enable us to eliminate the use of the HP 3000. For employees who have been equipped with personal computers, the obvious advantages and flexibility over the old system are apparent. The entire staff anxiously awaits the conversion so that the benefits and flexibility of the network can be fully realized. Respectfully Submitted, Viki Copeland Finance Director Concur: Stephen R B ell City Manager 3 P. sney Assi ant City Manager ATTACHMENT A: RECOMMENDED SOFTWARE PURCHASES 1993-94 GET PREP,AR'.ATI CITYOWEOVNROLISG ....... .... ..... .......... YO N..L >::: >: <: .:::::::::::::::::: SATE..: SOFIWARE:C.OSTS>> > > < >> < >$56,888 > > >><> > > <> > ><>> >> S25853> <>> > > << < > '$2:500:.:::.................... ...................... SUPPORTCOSTS ...... ....... ............... ::::..::;:::::::::::;:::;:::;:::::;::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: >> ' : : . ; ....... ......................... (ANNUAL). $7,614 ::......... RT TT ST CITY COUNCIL MEETING: FEBRUARY 22, 1994 ATTACHMENT B: RECOMMENDED SOFTWARE & HARDWARE FOR PARKING ENFORCEMENT 1993-94: (COMPARISON WITH EXISTING SYSTEM) } IS. WINDOWS: »> <<>AS NOTED IN:`::,.. SED'' SOFTWARE >:: >: STEM'>THE . PHOENIX:»::>:;::>:>_>::>::::>::>:::>:::>:>::>::::>::>::>::::>:;<:>:>;:>::::«:::>:<:<::: :,, I'TEiyf IITLI `INC UDE >as> ><; ;'GROUP DOES NOT:>:><><<:>;8 NANDENDISSATl PR.yIDE pc,:-BsEIU> .:.. ITATION: ITER :»:>:>::>::>::>::.: ;:. CITATION < « < <:>::::<:SOFTWf�RE:: i IIN<::>::>:< <:>:IvfATAiTENANCE><><> L'ERir ORIvi".AI*i.. PROCESSINGORDER RET 'MOD CONVERSION:::>:<::«:>:THE EXIST iIK>TO:::>:;::>:>:>:»:><>:>:A►U'.['OMAT z;EMPLOEE`>::::>::::>::::>::::>::::>:<:::>:: ....Y .....SOFT'WARE'I`HE>><:<:::>:::<:::>.CONIpL7I'ER:>::>:::>::>:>:::><:<<:WRITERS'.H; `I RAININ4::;:;<::>:>:<:>:«:>:CITY: WE]Ui:D NEEOlig IAINTENANCE<> ; ; ;:T.O BE ON-LINE:::VIA>; .;CODE READ REAbEIt < ;< MODEM TO THEIR < > > > > SQI�'1'W'.AR�»i>><><<<IYXAit�TTHN;A.1 N -LINE D STEM:>::::>:::>:>> >> > MPATI ::: : RETRI EAG>>>>><>>>»>>><>:>;> <<><><<><»>>::INTN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: FEBRUARY 22, 1994 1 May 4, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 APPROVAL OF HANDICAP RAMPS CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS FOR FUNDS TDA ARTICLE 3 FUNDS FOR FY 1994-95 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council: 1. Approve and adopt Resolution No. 94- , a resolution of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach. A. Approving the application for discretionary regional funds for the construction of handicap ramps at various locations in the City. Background: The purpose of this project is to construct handicap ramps at street corners city-wide to comply with the Americans with Disability Act (ADA). The construction of the handicap ramps at various locations in the city will be identified in the 94-95 CIP Program (CIP 94-147). The total construction cost of this project is estimated at $110,000 and funded with the State Gas Tax Funds. There is an opportunity to receive funds in an amount of $6,769 to fund a portion of the construction cost of handicap ramps project through TDA, Article 3 discretionary funds. Analysis: TDA Article 3 discretionary funds will be available County -wide for bikeway and pedestrian projects of regional significance. These regional funds will be allocated at the discretion of the Commission for new construction, pedestrian facilities, or for off-street bikeway maintenance. Such discretionary funds allocated to new facilities must be spent within two years of allocation, unless a one year extension is granted by Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Fiscal Impact: None at this time, as no funds are being expended. This is an application for funding. lii Alternative: An alternative to City Council is: 1. Do nothing; thereby, allowing possible available funds to lapse to the County. Respectfully submitted, H HomaY n Behboodi Capital Improvement Program Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Director of Finance Attachments: Resolution No. 94- pworks/CCSIGSCH Concur: Amy Ardirani, Director of Public Works Stephen 'Bu "rell City Manager RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN FUNDS UNDER SB 821 AND APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF ITS BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN PLAN. WHEREAS, SB 821 provides that 2% of each county's total local Transportation Fund be annually set aside and used to fund the development of bicycle and pedestrian facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach desires to construct and maintain handicap ramps within their city utilizing, in part, the funds available under SB 821. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does resolve as follows: 1. To adopt construction of handicap ramps in conformance with the Americans with Disabilty Act; 2. To authorize the Director of Public Works as the City's authorized signature and designated contact person; 3. To apply for all funds available to the City of Hermosa Beach allocated for Bikeways and Pedestrian facilities (SB 821); 4. To maintain, or cause to be maintained in safe condition, all facilities whose construction is wholly or partially funded by the requested allocation of SB 821 funds. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney pworks/RESOPRSC - May 3, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PILOT PROJECT 1 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the attached Resolution requesting support for proceeding with the South Bay Area Pilot Project. Background: The need for a SMART corridor at the San Diego Freeway corridor in the South Bay has been identified in a statewide study. In response, Metropolitan Transportation Authority staff along with the South Bay Transportation Corridor Steering Committee and the South Bay Coordination Committee for Traffic Improvements hired Meyer, Mohaddes Associates to develop a 10 -year conceptual design planning study of traffic signal system improvements in the South Bay area of Los Angeles County. Analysis: The conceptual design planning study identifies Pilot Project 1 as one of the overall South Bay area 10 -year concept plan projects. This project entails improvements to traffic signal systems along the following four major arterials: 1. Pacific Coast Highway/Sepulveda Boulevard, between the eastern City limits of Long Beach and the Los Angeles International Airport. 2. Willow Street/Sepulveda Boulevard between the eastern City limits of Long Beach and Hawthorne Boulevard. 3. Western Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and I-105 freeway. 4. Hawthorne Boulevard between Pacific Coast Highway and I-105 freeway. The project will also include improvements to supporting routes adjacent to the above four major arterials. The first two years of the project will consist of replacement of outdated traffic signal equipment and development of signal timing plans on the four major arterial and supporting routes. These projects result in the most cost effective improvements which will lead to a more efficient system for the South Bay. The preliminary engineering, plans, specifications and the estimates of the first two year implementation program of Project Pilot 1 began in January 1994 and should be completed by October 1994. In order to move forward with the design phase of the project, staff requests adoption of the attached resolution. Fiscal Impact: The first two year implementation program of Pilot Project 1 was funded from the Proposition C 25% discretionary funds in the amount of $3,421 million. No funding is required by the city of Hermosa Beach. Other South Bay agencies local funds should not be affected. Respectfully submitted, Joseph C. Mankawich Capital Improvement Program Engineer Concur: Amy Amirani Director of Public Works \ Steve City Manger a:tyjmss Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland Finance Director RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH SUPPORTING THE SOUTH BAY AREA SIGNAL PROJECT WHEREAS, the South Bay Traffic Signal Improvement Project unites the following cities and other agencies in an effort to design and construct the signal synchronization improvements identified in the July 1993 conceptual Design Study of traffic Signal System Improvements in the South Bay Area of Los Angeles County: - CARSON - CULVER CITY - EL SEGUNDO - GARDENA - HAWAIIAN GARDENS - HERMOSA BEACH - REDONDO BEACH - ROLLING HILLS - LAWNDALE - LOMITA - LONG BEACH - LOS ANGELES - HAWTHORNE - CALTRANS - INGLEWOOD - ROLLING HILLS ESTATES - SIGNAL HILL - TORRANCE - PALOS VERDES ESTATES - MANHATTAN BEACH - RANCHO PALOS VERDES - L. A. COUNTY DPW WHEREAS, there has been excellent participation and full support by the engineering representatives from all involved agencies in the South bay area for implementation of Pilot Project 1 along these routes as shown on the attached map of the proposed South Bay traffic Signal Improvement Project. NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: (1) To fully support the South Bay transportation Corridor steering committee (JPA), the south Bay Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), in their efforts to implement Pilot Project 1; and (2) To participate and cooperate in its implementation, contingent upon securing the necessary construction funds; and (3) To participate in the ongoing pilot area forums to be coordinated by the LACMTA Signal Support Group; and (4) To develop and implement mutually agreed upon operating and maintenance policies and procedures; and (5) To insure ongoing multi -jurisdictional coordination; and (6) Furthermore agrees to operate and maintain the newly constructed facilities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _DAY OF , 1994. PRESIDENT of the City Council and Mayor of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: , City Attorney a:tyjmsp May 3, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 TIME EXTENSION FOR SUBMISSION OF 1994-95 PRELIMINARY BUDGET Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council extend the date for submission of the 1994-95 Preliminary Budget from May 15, 1994 to May 27, 1994. Background: Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2-98 requires the City Manager to submit a preliminary budget on or before May 15th of each year. Analysis: According to the City Attorney, a motion of the City Council to extend the deadline is the necessary action. Also, please note that the previously scheduled dates of May 26, 1994 and June 9, 1994 for the Budget Study Sessions have been changed to June 6, 1994 and June 20, 1994. In past years, two study sessions have not been necessary, but have been scheduled in the event they are needed. The scheduled date of June 28, 1994 for the Public Hearing and adoption of the 1994-95 Budget will remain unchanged. Respectfully submitted, Stphen R. Burrell City Manager ip CITY OF H E R M O S A BEACH TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Recommendation Adopt the attached resolution of intent. The attached resolution was prepared pursuant to your request at the April 26, 1994 meeting, to include a study of permitted uses as part of the study already underway to consider changes to uses requiring C.U.P.'s. PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Honorable Chairman and Membe of e Planning Commission Michael Schubach, Planning, Resolution of Intent to study permitted uses in certain zones May 4, 1994 CONCUR: Step�re' i/R." Burrell City nager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION 94- A RESOLUTION OF INTENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO INITIATE A STUDY OF ARTICLE 8, IN REGARDS TO PERMITTED USES IN CERTAIN ZONES WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on May 10, 1994, to consider initiating a study of what uses are permitted in certain zones and made a following findings: A. Permitted uses as listed in the C-1, C-2 and C-3 should be examined for possible adjustments, new uses, and consolidation of uses into more general categories; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY INITIATE A STUDY OF PERMITTED USES IN COMMERCIAL ZONES AND DIRECTS STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO EXAMINE THESE LISTS IN THE ZONING CODE FOR POSSIBLE CHANGES PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1994, PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: H/ccrsint CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 -: May 4, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 TREE PLANTING REIMBURSEMENT GRANT FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY (CDF) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign the attached resolution that will authorize Mary Rooney, Director of Parks and Recreation to execute amendments for Contract Number 8 CA 27539 with CDF in order to receive reimbursement of $17,600 for the trees planted on the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt. Background: On September 22, 1992, City Council authorized Mary Rooney with resolution No. 5576 to enter into an agreement with CDF in order to accept a grant award of $17,600 for tree planting. Analysis: In order for CDF to release the reimbursement grant fund to the City, CDF is requesting that the City Council approve a resolution to authorize Mary Rooney to execute the amendment for the time extension which was granted to the City by CDF in August 1993. Alternative: Do nothing: Thereby, allowing available funds to lapse to CDF and increasing Park and Recreation Facility Tax Fund obligation by the amount of $17,600. Respectfully submitted, Concur: Homayc n Behboodi CIP Engineer Noted for Fiscal Impact Viki Copeland Finance Director cctrees.doc Resolution Attached 00),01 Amy Amirani Public Works Director Stephen rrell City Manager ir 2 3 4 6 7 $ RESOLUTION 94 BE IT RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, State of California, in regular session assembled on the 10th day of May, 1994, that Mary Rooney, The director of Parks and Recreation is authorized and directed to execute Amendments for Contract Number 8 CA 27539 between said agency and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.. The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a resolution duly adopted by said City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach on the date therein set forth. Page 1 By: Title: April 28, 1994 City Council Meeting May 10, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 94-1108 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING MOTION PICTURE FILMING AND OTHER TRANSIENT ACTIVITIES AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 17, 22 AND APPENDIX A OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE." Submitted for adoption is Ordinance No. 94-1108, relating to the above subject. At the meeting of April 26, 1994, this ordinance was presented to Council for consideration, was amended, and was then introduced by the following vote: AYES: Benz, Bowler, Oakes, Reviczky, Mayor Edgerton NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Naom'Valdes, Deputy City Clerk Noted: Stephen R. Bfir je11, City Manager 2a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12i 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. 94-1108 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING MOTION PICTURE FILMING AND OTHER TRANSIENT ACTIVITIES AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 17, 22 AND APPENDIX A OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, motion picture production is an important industry to the economy of California and local governments; and WHEREAS, the City of Hermosa Beach expresses its desire and intention to create and maintain an environment in the City of Hermosa Beach conducive to motion picture production activities in all areas of the City; and WHEREAS, non -permanent filming activities are not unduly disruptive of neighboring land uses and will be regulated by the Filming Policy and Procedures, including mitigation measures; and WHEREAS, transient activities are defined as temporary, non- permanent and of short duration such as sales, parades, sports tournaments, filming activities and special events; and WHEREAS, these transient activities do not constitute a permanent use of land, but rather, only a temporary activity which does not disrupt neighboring land uses; WHEREAS, there has been an issue raised in regards to temporary or transient activities being in compliance with the City's Zoning Code and the City wishes to have clear and specific regulations regarding these activities; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the City Council have held Hearings on this proposed Ordinance and have taken into consideration the public testimony; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1 2 .3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20' 21 22 23 24 25 ; 26 27 28 Section 1. Chapter 17 Licenses, Section :7-6 of the Hermosa'Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows: "Sec. 17.6. License does not permit business otherwise prohibited. The issuance of a license to any person shall not entitle the holder thereof to conduct any business unless he has complied with all the requirements of this chapter and all other applicable laws, nor to carry on any business in any building or on any premises designated in such license in the event such building or premises are situated in a zone, or locality in which conduct of such business is in violation of any law. Except, however, chat licenses authorizing transient activities including transient sales, parades, sports tournaments, non -permanent filming activities, and special events shall not be deemed precluded within any area of the City by virtue of the Zoning Code. Transient activities are defined as temporary, non- permanent and of short duration. These transient activities do not constitute a permanent use of land, but rather, only a temporary activity." Section 2. Chapter 22 Parks, Playgrounds, etc., Section 22-5.7 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows: "Sec. 22-5.7. Commercial Filming Permits. As determined by the California Legislature in California Government Code Section 14998.1, motion picture production is an important industry to the economy of California and local governments in this state should accordingly provide an environment conducive to the undertakings of the motion picture industry. To that end, the City hereby expresses its desire and intention to create and maintain an environment in the City of Hermosa Beach conducive to motion picture production activities in all areas cf the City. In accordance with this purpose, film permits for non- permanent filming activities may be issued for filming on or in any private or City -owned property in any area of the City, irrespective of zoning in the area in which the permit is issued, provided that such transient activity to which the permit applies will not be unduly disruptive of neighboring land uses. The Community Resources Department is hereby vested with the authority to approve or deny film permits for non -permanent filming activities in any area of the City and in making such determination to approve or deny a film permit application, to exercise its discretion to determine (i) whether a particular filming activity is permanent or non -permanent, ;ii' whether a particular filming activity would unduly interfere with or disrupt neighboring land uses so as to justify denial of the permit, and (iii) mitigation measures to reduce any adverse impact on neighboring land uses. Conditions imposed under any permit shall reduce, to the extent the Community Resources 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 lo' 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 2c 26 1 27 28 Department determines appropriate in light of both the neighbors' and permitees' concerns, any adverse impact on neighboring land uses. .' A "non -permanent" filming activity for purposes of this section is an activity under an approved permit which involves no more than fifteen (15) days of consecutive filming at a single location. The City Council may adopt or amend from time to time the "Filming Policy and Procedures", which shall be consistent with this section and shall act as guidelines co the Community Resources Department in issuing or denying permits including appeal rights thereto, and which shall be incorporated by reference into any film permit which the Community Resources Department may issue. All film permits shall be subject to imposition of fees which shall be set forth in the Filming Policy and Procedures." Section 3. Appendix A Zoning Code, Section 1901 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows: °Sec. 1901. No conflicting licenses or permits shall be issued. Ail departments, officials or public employees vested with the duty or authority to issue permits or licenses where required by law shall conform to the provisions of the Zoning Code; except, however, that permits for transient activities including transient sales, parades, sports tournaments, non -permanent filming activities, and special events shall not be deemed as precluded within any area of the City by virtue of the Zoning Code. Transient activities are defined as temporary, non- permanent and of short duration. These transient activities do not constitute a permanent use of land, but rather, only a temporary activity. Except as expressly provided herein, no such license or permit for uses, buildings or purposes where the same would be in conflict with the provisions of the Zoning Code shall be issued. Any such license or permit, if issued in conflict with the prcvisions thereof, shall be null and void." Section 4. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance he rendered invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this chapter shall remain in full force and effect. Section s. This Ordinance shall become effective and be 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in full force and effect in the manner provided by law. Secti:n 6. The City Clerk shall publish this Ordinance and the vote thereon, in the Easy Reader, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Hermosa Beach, prior to fifteen days after the date of its adoption. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, make minutes of its passage and adoption in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same was passed and adopted, and enter the same in the bock of original Ordinances of said City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1994. ATTEST: City Clerk MAYOR and PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hermosa Beach May 3, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 94-1 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER ELIMINATING OR MODIFYING SECTION 1413, WHICH REQUIRES COUNCIL MODIFICATIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS, ON APPEAL OR RECONSIDERATION, TO BE REFERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL P.C. Recommendation: To introduce an ordinance to modify Section 1413 to reduce the need for referrals, but to continued to require in certain cases, as set forth in the attached ordinance. Alternative To introduce amendments as set forth in the alternative ordinance, prepared by staff, to eliminate the requirement for referrals for all discretionary land use cases. Background: The City Council initiated this amendment based on staff's recommendation. The Council and staff's concern is that the referral process is cumbersome, and requires referral regardless of the significance of the modification. At their meeting of April 5, 1994, the Planning Commission voted to modify Section 1413 to reduce the need for referrals by changing "shall" to "may". However, they also added provisions to specify that appeals/reconsiderations of precise development plans, variances, and height limit exceptions; projects requiring E.I.R.'s; and any reversal of an action of denial shall still be referred back. For further background please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report and minutes. Analysis: Section 1413 is a procedure section of the zoning ordinance related to conditional use permits. The City Attorney has broadly interpreted it to apply to all other discretionary land use approvals subject to appeal or reconsideration (i.e. precise development plans, variances, etc.). The section simply states that the Council may approve, modify, or disapprove the action of 4 the Planning Commission, but that any modification shall first be referred to the Planning Commission for review and comment. Section 1413 does not apply to legislative actions such a zone changes, zoning ordinance amendments, and general plan amendments. When Planning Commission recommendations are modified in these matters both local law and state law require the modifications to be referred back to the Planning Commission. Staff originally recommended a simple change to replace "shall" with "may" in Section 1413. This would mean that if a part of a conditional use permit or other land use matter was modified (such as a condition on a C.U.P.) the Council would no longer be required to delay final action for Commission review and comment. If the modification was significant, however, the Council would have the option to refer it back. The Commission believes that certain types of land use matters involving design review (precise development plans, variance, height limit exceptions) should require referral to allow review of any changes. Further, they are concerned about cases where a denial is reversed by the Council. If the case is not referred back, appropriate conditions or mitigation measures would not be considered. As such the Commission's final recommended ordinance, while reducing the need for referrals, specifies which projects shall be referred back, and which projects "may" be referred back. Also, it states that when a project requires an Environmental Impact Report modifications shall be referred back. Michael Schubach Planning Director Stephen City Manager rrell Attachments 1. P.C. recommended ordinance 2. Alternative text 3. P.C. Resolution KR/ccsrref 2 Associate Planner PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ORDINANCE 94 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND SECTION 1413, DECISIONS OF THE COUNCIL ON APPEALS AND RECONSIDERATIONS, TO ELIMINATE THE PROVISION REQUIRING COUNCIL MODIFICATIONS TO BE REFERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on May 10, 1994 to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The requirement that City Council modifications to the Planning Commission decisions on conditional use permits and similar discretionary permits be referred back to the Commission causes unnecessary and lengthy delays in the decision making process; B. To increase the efficiency of the City's appeal an reconsideration process, the referral requirement should be eliminated; C. The referral requirement is not required by State Planning and Zoning Law. D. This amendment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act as it has no possible impact on the environment as it is procedural. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 1413 to as follows (underlined text to be added overstriken text to be deleted): "The action by the city council on such matters shall be by three (3) affirmative votes of the council, and shall be final and conclusive except: (1) The city council may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendation of the planning commission, provided that any modification of a proposed precise development plan, variance, and/or height limit exception shall first be referred back to the Planning Commission for report and recommendation, and any modification of a proposed conditional use permit, nonconforming remodel, parking plan, permitted use request, by the council shall first may be referred back to the planning commission for report and recommendation, and the planning commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing on any of the above actions thereon. Failure of the planning commission to report to the city council 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 within forty (40) days after the reference, or such longer period as may be designated by the city council, shall be deemed to be approval of the propose modification. a. Exception: If any of the above described actions in subsection 1413(1) requires an environmental impact report, modification by the City Council shall require referral back to the Planning Commission. Any reversal of a denial of any of the above described actions shall first be referred back to the planning commission for report and recommendation (2) Upon return of the matter to the city council, the city council may by three (3) affirmative votes of the council, approve, modify or disapprove the final recommendation of the planning commission on such matters." SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective and in be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days of its final passage and adoption. SECTION 3. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days after the date of its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper of general circulation published and circulated, in the City of Hermosa Beach, in the manner provided by law. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city, and shall make minutes of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted. kr/persref PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ALTERNATIVE SECTION 1. Amend Section 1413 to as follows (underlined text to be added overstriken text to be deleted): "The action by the city council on such matters shall be by three (3) affirmative votes of the council, and shall be final and conclusive except: (1) The city council may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendation of the planning commission, provided that any modification of a proposed conditional use permit, precise development plan, variance, height limit exception, nonconforming remodel, parking plan, permitted use request or other similar discretionary land use matter, by the council shall -first may be referred back to the planning commission for report and recommendation, and the planning commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing thereon. Failure of the planning commission to report to the city council within forty (40) days after the reference, or such longer period as may be designated by the city council, shall be deemed to be approval of the propose modification. (2) Upon return of the matter to the city council, the city council may by three (3) affirmative votes of the council, approve, modify or disapprove the final recommendation of the planning commission on such matters." KR/ccordref 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 •20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION P.C. 94-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO RECOMMEND AMENDING SECTION 1413, DECISIONS OF THE COUNCIL ON APPEALS AND RECONSIDERATIONS, TO MODIFY THE PROVISION REQUIRING COUNCIL MODIFICATIONS TO BE REFERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 15 and April 5, 1994 to consider oral and written testimony and made the following Findings: A. The requirement that City Council modifications to to Planning Commission decisions on conditional use permits and similar discretionary permits be referred back to the Commission causes unnecessary and lengthy delays in the decision making process; B. To increase the efficiency of the City's appeal and reconsideration process, the referral requirement should be eliminated; C. This amendment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act as it has no possible impact on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, recommends that the zoning ordinance text be amended as follows: SECTION 1. Amend Section 1413 to read as follows: "The action by the city council on such matters shall be b three (3) affirmative votes of the council, and shall b final and conclusive except: (1) The city council may approve, modify or disapprove th recommendation of the planning commission, provided tha any modification of any proposed precise development plan, variance, and/or height limit exception shall first be referred back to the Planning Commission for, report and recommendation, and any modification of a proposed conditional use permit, nonconforming remodel, parking plan, permitted use request by the council ohall- first may be referred back to the planning commissior for report and recommendation, and the planning 6 commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing on any of the above actions thereon-. Failure of the planning commission to report to the city council within forty (40) days after the reference, or such longer period as may be designated by the city council, shall be deemed to be approval of the proposed modification. a. Exception: If any of the above described actions in subsection 1413(1) requires an environmental impact report, modification by the City Council shall require referral back to the Planning Commission b. Any reversal of a denial of any of the above described actions shall first be referred back to the planning commission for report and recommendation. (2) Upon return of the matter to the city council, the city council may by three (3) affirmative votes of the council, approve, modify or disapprove the final recommendation of the planning commission on such matters." VOTE: AYES: Comms.Di Monda,Marks,Suard,Chmn.Merl NOES: Comm.Dettelbach ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution P.C. 94-12 is a true and complete record of the action taken by the Plannin Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach, California at their regular meeting of April 5, 1994. Rod Merl, S- J- f 5I Chairman Date p/persref 1 7 Michael Schubach, Secretary May 3, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 26, 1994) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-6 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 13, NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Alternatives: 1. Return the item back to the Commission with policy direction 2. Receive and file the study (no changes to existing code) 3. Planning Commission recommended changes (as contained in the previous report) Background: The City Council continued this item to address policy considerations. For further background please refer to the previous report and attachments. Analysis: Attached, in order to assist you in making policy direction, is a summary of the current nonconforming provisions, with a brief history of when each provision was adopted. (For the complete text of the current ordinance please refer to the attachment provided with the previous staff report pages 38-49) As you can see, most provisions were adopted as part of a comprehensive revision in 1989. The 1989 amendments were based on the concepts contained in the Manhattan Beach code. Some provisions are more comprehensive and specific (for example, describing in detail how to calculate expansion areas) and somewhat less restrictive, for example, up to 100% expansion of nonconforming residential structures is allowed. Since 1989 a substanial number of residential buildings have been successfully remodeled and expanded, including 20 approved by the Planning Commission to allow a greater than 50% expansion. 5 Based on the concerns expressed at the last meeting the Council may wish to consider the following policy options: • Change the code to allow expansion of nonconforming commercial structures • Simplify the code by focusing on the allowed expansion and remove the elements which dictate what can or cannot be demolished. CONCUR: Michae Schubach Planning Director Stephe R. ':, Hell City Mana:er Attachments 1. Summary of existing nonconforming provisions KR/ccsrnon .00 e Robertson Associate Planner SUMMARY: NONCONFORMING PROVISIONS I. Pertaining to remodeling and expansions (Sec. 13-3, 13-7, and 13-2) SECTION 13-3, NONCONFORMING USE OF A NONCONFORMING BUILDING Establishes that a nonconforming commercial or manufacturing use may be continued, but prohibits any expansion. A 90 day discontinuance of the nonconforming use cause loss of any right to continue that use. Allows non-structural remodeling and repairs such as enlargement of windows or door openings, repair to plumbing or electrical Allows remodeling and expansion of nonconforming residential uses subject to certain standards, summarized as follows: Structural Removal allowed: • Roofs may be removed to add additional stories; • A maximum of 10% of lineal feet of exterior walls and/or floor area may be removed; • Anything more requires Planning Commission approval. Expansion/Remodel allowed: • Maximum of 50% of the "replacement cost" of the existing structure (ordinance specifies how to calculate remodeled area and expanded area) • Parking must comply with Section 1162 (2 existing spaces per unit) otherwise expansion is limited to 250 square feet (if one parking space) or 100 square feet (if no existing parking) • Expansion not permitted if density exceeds 45 units per acre • Expansion must conform to current codes (except existing nonconforming side yards may be continued if within 10% of current side yard standard) Includes a purpose and intent paragraph stating that this section is for allowing remodeling and expansion to residential structures in sound condition. If significant portions must be removed, then expansion/remodeling is prohibited. HISTORY: Adopted as part of 1989 comprehensive revisions, replacing a 1984 adopted exception clause which allowed unlimited expansion to nonconforming residential uses. (expansions of commercial/manufacturing uses were not previously permitted, and no change was made). Prior to 1984 there was no exception for nonconforming residential uses. P.C. RECOMMENDATION: To incorporate 13-2 and 13-3 into new section titled "nonconforming uses." In substance, the changes are minor: To be less rigid and onerous in the purpose section allowing significant removal in some cases (subject to approval of the P.C. based on specified criteria); To prohibit remodeling/expansion of residential uses located in a commercial zone, and : To clarify what constitutes wall removal. OPTIONS: • Adopt P.C. Recommendation • Modify P.C. Recommendations, and send back for review and comment • No change • Initiate further amendments with policy direction to P.C. SECTION 13-7. CONFORMING USE OF A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE Prohibits expansion of nonconforming commercial or manufacturing structures. Allows for expansion/remodeling of residential structures as allowed in section 13-3 for nonconforming residential uses, and allows more removal and potential expansion, as follows: Structural Removal allowed: • Up to 30% of existing lineal feet of exterior walls and or floor area Expansion/Remodel allowed: • Up to 100% expansion/remodel of the "replacement cost" of the existing structure (greater than 50% up to 100% requires P.C. approval). • Existing nonconforming side yards may be continued subject to P.C. approval Includes the same purpose and intent statement as in Section 13-3, which prohibits "significant removal". HISTORY: Amended in 1989 as part of comprehensive revisions, replacing 1984 adopted provisions which allowed unlimited expansion of nonconforming structures of all types (except that parking compliance was required for commercial and to some degree for residential --see Section 1162, attached). Parking was the only nonconformity for the majority of commercial structures. Pre -dating 1970 the code did not allow expansions to nonconforming structures in "C" or "M" zones. 1984 amendments repealed that section, and thus from 1984-1989 expansions would have been permitted. P.C. RECOMMENDATION: To make the similar changes as stated for section 13-3: To amend the purpose and intent section to make it less rigid in regards to significant removal of existing structures, and; To clarify what constitutes wall removal and other clarifications. Further, the Article 11.5 Parking is referenced to recognize that a building which is only nonconforming to parking requirements may potentially be expanded (pursuant to the new parking ordinance that would apply in the downtown area). OPTIONS: • Adopt P.C. recommended changes • Modify P.C. changes and send back for review and comment • No Change • Initiate further amendments with policy direction to the Planning Commission SECTION 13-2 NONCONFORMING USE OF A CONFORMING BUILDING Establishes that a nonconforming use may be continued, but prohibits any expansion. A 90 day discontinuance of the nonconforming use cause loss of any right to continue that use. Allows for non-structural remodeling, such as enlargements of windows or door openings, repair to plumbing or electrical HISTORY: Amended as part of 1989 comprehensive revisions eliminating an exception clause which previously allowed expansion of nonconforming residential uses in Residential, Commercial, or Manufacturing zones (expansion on nonconforming commercial uses was not previously permitted). Also, added language to allow non-structural remodeling. P.C. RECOMMENDATION: To eliminate this section, and incorporate together with 13-3, "nonconforming use of a nonconforming building" in one section title "nonconforming uses" (see explanation under 13-3) Separate standards for nonconforming uses based on whether it is occurring in a conforming building or a nonconforming building is confusing. OPTIONS: 1. No change (however, this means the inconsistency between 13-2 and 13-3 would remain) 2. Adopt P.C. recommendation to eliminate this section, and establish one section titled "nonconforming uses". 3. Modify, and send to P.C. for review and comment II. Definitions SECTION 239. NONCONFORMING BUILDING Provides the definition of nonconforming building, as distinguished from a nonconforming use -- a building or structure that does not conform to current codes HISTORY: In zoning ordinance since pre -1970 P.C. RECOMMENDATION: Clarification and simplification of the definition --no change in meaning OPTIONS: 1. No Change 2. Adopt P.C. recommended changes 3. Modify, and send to P.C. for review and comment SECTION 240. NONCONFORMING USE Provides the definition of nonconforming use as distinguished from a nonconforming building -- the use or activity on a property does not conform with current use requirements (e.g. commercial activity in a residential zone) HISTORY: In zoning ordinance since pre -1970 P.C. RECOMMENDATION: Clarification of the definition --no change in meaning OPTIONS: 1. No Change 2. Adopt P.C. Recommended changes 3. Modify and send to P.C. for review and comment III. Other Sections included in the study by the Commission (13-1) SECTION 13-1 NONCONFORMING USE LIMITS OTHER USES Prohibits new uses on any lot which already has a nonconforming use, even if the new use is a conforming use. HISTORY: This section pre -dates 1970 as a way to discourage expansion of uses on a property with a nonconforming use, and to encourage removal of existing nonconforming uses. P.C. RECOMMENDATION. To modify and clarify how this section applies to properties with multiple uses. For example, if one tenant in multi -tenant property is a nonconforming use it is unfair and excessively restrictive to prohibit new uses elsewhere on the lot. As such P.C. proposed modification specifically would state that no new use may be established "in that portion of the lot or building which existing nonconforming use occupies." OPTIONS: 1. Adopt P.C. recommendation 2. No change 3. Initiate further amendments with policy direction. IV. Other sections of Article 13, not studied by the Planning Commission SECTION 13-0. GENERAL GOALS States the goals of the City Council related to the nonconformity that exists throughout the city as a result of zone changes, as follows: • To allow nonconforming uses and building in sound condition --which meet certain standards --to remain and be maintained • To encourage restoration and maintenance of historical residential buildings • To encourage the use of the ordinance to meet current and future minimum standards of parking, open space, setbacks, height, etc. • To prohibit remodeling and expansion of buildings which by current standards are exceptionally undersized, dilapidated, significantly overdense, or do not meet minimal standards for parking and setback. HISTORY OF SECTION: Adopted 9/89 along with comprehensive revisions to this Article. P.C. RECOMMENDATION: Not part of current study OPTIONS: 1. No Change 2. Initiate amendments to redefine goals with policy direction to P.C. SECTION 13-4. CHANGE IN STATUS OF A NONCONFORMING USE States that if a nonconforming use is vacated or removed and is succeeded by another use; vested rights for the pre-existing nonconforming use are terminated. Allows the succeeding use to also be a nonconforming use provided the degree of nonconformity is less intensive.. The stated intent of this section is to allow for improvement in the degree of nonconformity within existing buildings, and not to allow construction of new buildings with nonconforming uses. Determinations on whether a use is less intensive are made by the Planning Commission on request. HISTORY: Rewritten for clarity as part of 1989 comprehensive revision. Part of zoning code since pre -1970. P.C. RECOMMENDATION: Not part of study OPTIONS: No Change Initiate amendments with policy direction to P.C. SECTION 13-5. NONCONFORMING COMMERCIAL AND MANUFACTURING BUSINESS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT This section requires pre-existing businesses that fall into categories that require C.U.P.s, but do not possess a C.U.P., to obtain one within two years of the date of the adoption of the ordinance. The most common examples were liquor stores and auto repair shops. Almost all such businesses are now in compliance with this section. HISTORY: Sub -section (a) pertaining to establishments selling alcohol was adopted in 1986, while sub -section (b) pertaining to remaining nonconforming commercial and manufacturing businesses was adopted in 1990. P.C. RECOMMENDATION: Not part of study OPTIONS: 1. No Change 2. Initiate amendment or elimination, with policy direction to P.C. SECTION 13-6. RECONSTRUCTION OF A DAMAGED NONCONFORMING BUILDING Sets forth the standards for reconstructing nonconforming buildings destroyed by fire or other Act of God: • If destroyed less than or equal to 50% of its reasonable replacement cost, the building may be restored as it previously existed. • If destroyed more than 50%, it must be restored in conformity with current zoning standards. • Provides for exceptions for nonconforming residential structures in R -zones, which may be rebuilt if certain guidelines are met, upon approval by the Planning Commission Sets forth the method for determining the extent of damage. Disputes over interpretation or requests for waivers are handled by the Planning Commission. States that if damage is widespread and a State of Emergency is declared, the section would be superseded by action of the City Council. HISTORY: Amended 5/93 to add exception for nonconforming residential structures destroyed more than 50% and, to add for clarification purposes, the method for determining the extent of damage; interpretation responsibility; and what happens in case of citywide damage. P.C. RECOMMENDATION: Not part of study. OPTIONS: 1. No Change (This was studied and amended very recently) 2. Initiate amendments with policy direction to the Planning Commission SECTION 13-8 NONCONFORMING HISTORIC BUILDINGS Allows for deviations from Article 13, and other sections of the zoning ordinance, for preserving and/or renovating locally recognized historic structure. The deviations are approved through approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. HISTORY: Adopted as part of 1989 comprehensive revisions. Previously there was no recognition or exceptions for historic structures. OPTIONS: 1. No Change 2. Initiate amendments, with policy direction to the Planning Commission Section 1162, Off-street parking requirements for new and existing construction. Contained in the parking section of the zoning code, this section sets forth the standards for remodeling and expansion when a structure is nonconforming to parking, as follows: Residential Expansion Requirements: • Two parking spaces per unit required to allow full expansions allowed by Article 13 • If one parking space:, maximum 250 square foot expansion • If no parking: maximum 100 square foot expansion • Provides exceptions to parking stall sizes for existing spaces. Commercial Expansion Requirements No expansion or intensification without full compliance with current parking requirements. NOTE: This section has been amended by ordinance of the City Council, pending approval from the Coastal Commission, to require parking only for expanded or intensified area --along with less parking requirements for downtown in another section. HISTORY: Residential requirements amended as part of 1989 comprehensive revisions. Previously, only one existing parking space was needed to allow full expansion, and if no parking 100 square foot expansion was allowed. Commercial expansion requirements pre -date 1970 to require compliance with parking standards before any expansion, prior to 1985, however, parking requirements for all commercial uses was 1 per 300 square feet. The requirement that intensification of uses (i.e. chang from office to restauraunt) require full compliance was added in 1985 at the same time commercial parking standards were comprehensively revised and increased. OPTIONS: 1. No change 2. Initiate amendments with policy direction 9 ITEM #5: SPECIAL STUDY TO CONSIDER TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 13, NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS OF APRIL 12 & 26, 1994. PLEASE REFER TO ITEM #4 OF THE APRIL 12, 1994 AGENDA PACKET TO REVIEW ORIGINAL STAFF REPORT. May 3, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 12, AND APRIL 26, 1994) SUBJECT: SPECIAL STUDY 93-7 PURPOSE: TO CONSIDER A TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING HEIGHT" AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF "GRADE". INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Alternatives: 1. Introduction of the ordinance amending the definitions, as recommended by the Planning Commission (and provide policy direction to the Planning Commission and staff for the procedure in making grade determinations) 2. Introduction of an ordinance as previously recommended by staff to Planning Commission 3. A combination of 1 and 2 4. Return the item back to the Commission with policy direction on the grade determination issue. Background: The City Council continued this item, requesting more information and alternatives on the determination of grade, including other cities' approaches. Analysis: ALTERNATIVE 1 As previously discussed, the Planning Commission recommendation is to only slightly modify the definition for building height. In addition a new definition for "grade" is proposed. The Commission's approach, after considering more detailed definitions for grade, was to use a simple and easily understood definition. Staff could then establish a procedure to deal with the more complex realities. Based on the discussions at the last two meetings it appears that the proposed definition of "grade" does not satisfy the desire of the Council that the definition clearly states that height be measured from pre-existing or undisturbed grade. An option would be to adopt the ordinance amendments as recommended by the Commission, and create a clear policy and procedure for staff to follow when making grade determinations. ALTERNATIVE 2 Staff has been grappling with the same issues discussed by the Council at the last two meetings. Our original recommended solution, which was supported by Building Department staff, was a definition of grade based on the nearest public improvement, typically an alley or sidewalk. This was considered by the Planning Commission which thought it too complex and difficult too understand for a general ordinance definition. Staff's proposal was to determine "grade" by using the grade of abutting public improvements (a street or alley), or if not abutting, interpolating from the nearest such point. (SEE ATTACHED ALTERNATIVE 2 AND DIAGRAMS) In cases where property line corners abut other private property, and public improvements cannot be used for grade determination, additional information such as surrounding spot elevations can be used. Further, to address unusual lots with extreme convex contours a more detailed topographic survey could be provided subject to approval by the Planning Commission. In these situations, the city's old street profiles could be used to assist in making the grade determination. The intent is included in the definition, and seems consistent with the desire of the Council to base the height measurement from grade. Given the discussions at the last two meetings, staff believes this previously proposed definition should be reconsidered. Since it was discussed and considered by the Commission it may not have to be sent back for review and comment. The advantage of this alternative is that common points of reference are used where possible, which have not changed since the streets and alleys were graded. Additionally, this is generally consistent with past practices established by the Building Department (under which a lot of buildings have been constructed). ALTERNATIVE 3 Alternatives 1 and 2 could be combined in several ways. For example, the P.C. recommendation for building height could be used in conjunction with Alternative 2 grade definition. ALTERNATIVE 4 Other possibilities discussed during the course of this study derived from other cities. Any of these approaches of defining grade or any other suggested approach would require returning this study back to Commission for further review. The terms or definitions used by other cities could also be combined or incorporated into the other alternatives. 1 Manhattan Beach defines "existing grade" as "The surface of the ground or pavement at a stated location as it exists prior to disturbance in preparation for a project regulated by this title." Exceptions are allowed for using "finished" or "local' grade for unusual situations Redondo Beach uses the term "natural grade" without any definition. Santa Monica also uses "natural grade" defined as "the surface in its natural state". (Please refer to pages 27-35 of the previous attachments for copies of these ordinances). Please be advised that the building height measurement method is different in these cities as averaging approaches are used. NOTE: The Building Department has always made the final determinations in grade and height measurements in an appropriate manner as consistent with the definition as practically possible. In cases where grade had been lowered as part of a project, the measurement involved two -parts: the building height measured from existing grade (the height envelope method), and a measurement from the part of the building that abutted the lowered grade. The intent of the subject study was to define "existing grade"(a recommendation of the land use element) and to create a better definition of building height to more accurately reflects the actual method being used. In both approaches discussed above, the use of lowered "finished grade" as a basis for measuring height has been deleted from the definition. Michael Schubach Planning Director Steph City M Burrell ager Attachments: 1. Alternative 1 2. Alternative 2 3. Alternative 2 diagrams KR/ccsrhite Ken Robertson Associate Planner ALTERNATIVE 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION "Sec. 208 Building Height "Building Height" means a vertical distance of the building as measured from grade at property line corner points, to the highest point of the building" incorporated herein, as shown in the following example. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ENVELOPE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PER BUILDING HEIGHT EXAMPLE Alley Highest Point of Building • BUIL0IN HEIGHT I. Grade Plane Based on lour corner points _uQ_ Actual Elevation Points from Topographical Survey Sec. 208.1 Grade Interpolated Point on Grade Plane 4 Skiewalk Street "Grade", means the existing surface of the ground, either paved or unpaved." ALTERNATIVE 2 Sec. 208 Building Height "Building Height" means a vertical distance measured from the " grade" of a lot, determined as described herein, from any portion of the building site covered by the building to the corresponding uppermost point of the roof The " grade" of a lot, for the purpose of measuring building height, is a flat or sloping plane based on the grade elevations at the corner points of a lot. Corner point elevations are determined from their actual elevation when abutting public improvements, or by interpolating on a straight line between the nearest public improvement on the front of lot to the nearest on the rear of the lot (for example from sidewalk to alley) ; or in the case where a lot abuts another property the corner point elevations are determined by interpolating on a straight line between the edge of the street, sidewalk, or alley, whichever is closer to the subject property, to the corner point elevations where the lot abuts another lot. When using corner points not based on public improvements additional survey information, such as surrounding spot elevations, must be provided to verify that the grade at these points has not been altered. The intent of this definition is for building height to be measured from the grade of a lot, as it can best be determined, as the grade existed naturally or after the most permanent alteration to the land was completed at the time the first public improvements were installed (streets, alleys, and sidewalks); and, for the maximum building height line to follow a straight line between such public improvements. Further, the purpose of this definition is to ensure that building height measurements are consistently applied without being biased by more recent alterations to grade. For unusual lots with extreme convex contours, the " grade" of a lot shall be based on a detailed topographical survey with spot elevations called out at minimum 2 foot intervals, rather than the flat plane method described above. In these cases, the determination of grade shall be made by the Planning Commission. 110 Alley Cannot Exceed max. Bldg. Height 'iry-<y 30' ........... . Interpolated Point on Existing Grade Plane_ ALTERNATIVE 2 - DIAGRAMS Diagrams for Pitched Roof Critical Point of Building Max. Height (103.5 + 25 = 128.5) 1 00' 01.5 a Existing Grade Plane Based on four corner points ' these two points interpolated from the edge of sidewalk 110. Actual Elevation Points from Survey (101) Interpolated Elevation Points 30' (110.2) 110 Alley 112 (100 99.5 Sidewalk Diagram for a Flat Roof Street Critical Point of Building Max. Height (102.7+ 25 = 127.5) Cannot Exceed max. Bldg. Height . Interpolated Point on Existing Grade Plane 1 00' n Existing Grade Plane Based on four corner points • these two points interpolated from the edge of sidewalk 110 Actual Elevation Points from Survey (101) Interpolated Elevation Points 25' Sidewalk 99.5 01.5 i Street ems 1(f), (g), (j) and (1) were heard at this time but are -hown in order for clarity. Public co .•cents on items removed from the consent are shown un PUBLIC HEARINGS the appropriate item. 4. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT NDMENT THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARD G USES, with Ordinance for i reading. Memorandum om Schubach dated April •, 1994. endar T. XAMINE ARTICLE 13 OF CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND ction and waiver of full Pla .ing Director Michael Action: To co• 'nue this item to the Reg • ar Meeting of April 26, 94, in order to have it hear• by a full Council. Moti.- Mayor Edgerton, second Bowler. The motion c. ied, n• ing the absence of Benz and Oakes. 5. SPECIAL STUDY AND TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DEFINITION AND METHOD OF DETERMINATION FOR GRADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT, AND ADOPTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Memorandum from Planning Director Michael Schubach dated April 4, 1994. Planning Director Schubach presented the staff report and responded to Council questions. The public hearing opened at 7:52 P.M. Coming forward to address the Council on this item were: Shirley Cassell - 611 Monterey Blvd., mentioned her concern that certain items on the Consent Ordinance (item 2) section should have been given public hearings; Howard Longacre - 1221 Seventh Place, questioned the term "existing grade" referenced in the Ordinance, felt it should be "original grade" as people sometimes tried to build up the grade by filling in with soil and cited the former St. Michael's Hospital site as an example; requested that the item be continued for a full Council; Pete Tucker - 235 34th Street, questioned if this was commercial as well as residential (told by staff this was residential only); suggested that Hermosa include a "pre -demolition" survey such as Manhattan Beach requires; and, Frances Parker - 621 Loma Drive, suggested her preference for "original grade as determined by earliest City records". Councilmember Benz arrived at 8:09 P.M. The public hearing closed at 8:10 P.M. City Council Minutes 04-12-94 Page 8486 City Attorney Vose suggested alternative wording for a proposed amendment to the Ordinance. City Manager Burrell suggested that a survey could be accomplished from aerial records of ground elevation taken by the County. Action: To amend the proposed Ordinance to certain" from the best survey from City bring the Ordinance back for introduction Meeting of April 26, 1994. Motion Reviczky, second Bowler. The motion the abstaining vote of Benz and the absence include a "date records and to at the Regular carried, noting of Oakes. . 1994 CONFORMANCE SELF -CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION FOR THE CI TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROG'' CMS), AND ADOPTION OF THE CMS LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION RE'•'T, w.th Resolution for adoption. Memorandum from Pla ning Di -ctor Michael Schubach dated April 5, 1994. Planni g Director Schubach presented the staff respond =d to Council questions. The public hea to address the at 8:20 P.M. ort and ng opened at 8:20 P.M. As no one ame forward uncil on this item, the public -aring closed Action: To a Resolution No. 9 CITY COUNCIL OF T FINDING THE CITY TO MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION Motion Bowler, second unanimously, noting the abs rove the staff recomme -5676, entitled, E CITY OF HERMOSA E IN CONFORMANC MP) AND ADO IN ACCOR 089.1' Benz. ce •f dation to adopt A ESOLUTION OF THE BEACH, CALIFORNIA, WITH THE CONGESTION ING THE CMP LOCAL CE WITH CALIFORNIA At 8:22 P.M. the order of the agen MUNICIPAL MATTERS 7. MULTIVISION'S RESPONSE 'O CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 94- 5666 REGARDING RATE RE SLATION. Memo ndum from Assistant City Manager Mary Rooy dated April 4, 994. Assistant City Manger Rooney presented e staff report and responded to ouncil questions. Cit Attorney Vose also responded t• Council questions. The motion carried Oakes. was returned to item 1. Coming forward to ardress the Council on this item were: Walt Ha sel - representing MultiVision, .ddressed M tiVision's concerns; believed the rat should t be regulated; suggested that if there is to e a refund it should not be given until -fter the FCC has made a ruling, which might be wi in two months; responded to Council questions; Lissner - 2715 El Oeste Drive, supported th Council action for regulation and an immediate City Council Minutes 04-12-94 Page 8487 -3- ITEM #6: TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING HEIGHT" AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF "GRADE" THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS OF APRIL 12 & 26, 1994. PLEASE REFER TO ITEM #5 OF THE APRIL 12, 1994 AGENDA PACKET TO REVIEW ORIGINAL STAFF REPORT. Honorable Mayor May 3, 1994 and Members of City Council City Council Meeting of May 10, 1994 UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM PROGRESS REPORT RECOMMENDATION 1. Direct staff to complete preparation of an enforcement ordinance that requires seismic strengthening of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. 2. Set dates for June 6th & 8th 1994 for informational meetings with Melvyn Green & Associates explaining the proposed ordinance to URM owners & interested persons. 3. Schedule public hearings for July 12, 1994 BACKGROUND On April 25, 1989, the City Council approved an agreement with the firm of Melvyn Green and Associates to identify all URM buildings and prepare a seismic hazard mitigation program. To date, a field survey of URM buildings has been completed and the building owners notified. The results of that survey were reported to the City Council on December 12, 1989, and to the State Seismic Safety Commission. At the February 8, 1994 city council meeting staff was directed to rcnotify affected owners of the public hearings and the change of the compliance date from January 1, 1997 to January 1, 1996 ANALYSIS Proposed Ordinance The original recommendation, as indicated in the Seismic Hazard Mitigation Report prepared by Melvyn Green & Associates, provided for mandatory strengthening of all URM buildings by January 1, 1997. Further, all URM assembly buildings with a high occupant load (over 300 occupants) and URN' buildings undergoing significant renovations would be strengthened by January 1, 1995. Because of the close proximitv of the remaining URM buildings in the downtown commercial area and because of the current state of the economy it is recommended that the attached schedule for strengthening be incorporated into the administrative provisions of the new URM ordinance. The remainder of the URM ordinance other than the administrative provisions would adopt, by reference, Appendix Chapter 1, of the Uniform Code for Building Conservation. The parapet bracing and wall anchors, being the most critical part of the seismic retrofit procedure, needs to be completed early on in the process so as to reduce possibility of injury or death to people in or around these buildings at the time of a major earthquake. It is proposed that owners willing to undertake parapet bracing and wall anchorage by the dates listed on the schedule be given some additional time to complete the total retrofit process while those owners not willing to do this most critical work early on must complete the total retrofit earlier. Suggested timeline for Seismic Hazard Mitigation of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in the City of Hermosa Beach is as follows: Schedule of Seismic Strengthening of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings 5 ' Building Risk Classification 2 Occupant Load Buildings Each Classification 3 Install parapet bracing & wall anchors at roof 4 Complete strengthening after parapet bracing 5 Complete strengthening w/o parapet bracing 1 >300 4 July 1, 1995 Jan 1, 1998 Jan 1, 1996 2 100>299 23 Jan.1, 1996 Jan 1, 1999 Jan 1, 1997 3 50>99 14 Jan. 1, 1996 Jan 1, 2000 Jan 1, 1998 4 25>49 4 Jan. 1, 1996 Jan 1, 2001 Jan 1, 1999 5 1>24 I 4 Jan. 1, 1996 Jan 1, 2002 Jan 1, 2000 ' Building Risk Classifications arc based on the building occupant load as determined by the Uniform Building Code. 2 Parapet bracing includes bracing the parapets on all walls of the building and installing tension anchors from the wall to the roof on all walls 2 Complete strengthening includes the remainder of the strengthening work as required by the City's Ordinance. 'Complete strengthening includes all strengthening required by the City's Ordinance including parapet bracing and wail anchors. 5A11 buildings undergoing significant renovations shall be strengthened at the same time renovations are accomplished_ 2. Informational Meeting Melvyn Green has proposed holding two public information meetings for the purpose of explaining the technicalities of the proposed URM ordinance to URM building owners and interested persons. All owners would receive a copy of the attached letter in advance of the meetings. It is suggested that these meetings be held at 7:30 p.m. on June 6th at 4:30 p.m. on June 8th, thus offering owners a choice of times of day they may attend. These meetings would last no more than one hour and would provide ample time for questions and answers about the ordinance 3. Consultant In 1989 the city employed Melvyn Green & Associates to identify all URM buildings and prepare a Seismic Hazard Mitigation Program and accompanying ordinance. Although most of the work contracted to Melvyn Green & Associates was completed, the council direction at the time was to make seismic retrofit voluntary and the preparation of a URM ordinance was not completed. For the $3,100.00 remaining in the contract, Melvyn Green will again notify owners of the proposed impending ordinance, write the ordinance for the city as he has done for many other cities and present it for council approval. Respectfully Submitted, Interim, Sr. Building Inspector Michael Schubach Interim, Bldg. & Safety Director Noted: Al Steve : City M. nager Attachments: A. Letter from Melvyn Green to the City of Hermosa Beach Building & Safety Department B. Proposed notification letter to URM property owners. ,117/x4 e,i7L J1 • GREEN March 29, 1994 Mr. Charlie Swartz Building Department City of Hermosa Beach 1513 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Re: Seismic Survey Contract Tel (310) 792 9252 Fax (310) 792 8092 Dear Mr. Swartz: This letter will summarize our work to date and recommendations for the city regarding the seismic rehabilitation of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. In 1989 the city contracted with our office for a survey of URM buildings, preparation of letters of notification to the owners, a report to the Seismic Safety Commission and development of a draft ordinance. The survey work was completed by us and letters to owners of record sent. The report to the Seismic Safety Commission and ordinance recommendations were prepared and a report of our recommendations submitted. In addition I attended one City Council meeting to present the recommendations but the Council decided that no presentation was necessary. We had not completed all of our proposed work and there is 53100 of contract funds unexpended. As I understand it since that time little activity has taken place. Now the City Council wishes to continue the project and begin a seismic retrofit program. To set context, in the Northridge earthquake, there were no building related deaths due to URM structures. This is due to the fact that the buildings in Los Angeles had been retrofitted for earthquakes. Note the damage to Fillmore and Santa Monica where the program had not been implemented. The following work remains to be completed: Survey - The owners again need to be notified of the proposed program. Letters to some owners came back undelivered and there was no followup. There were some owners who disagreed with the survey and apparently were never responded to. The owners need to be notified that they have URM buildings. This should be done with certified mail to provide a paper trail We will review the reports and letters again. The city is to obtain current ownership records and mail the letters prepared by us. The Letters should let owners know of proposed public information meetings on the proposed ordinance and of planned public hearings. Melvyn Green & Associates Inc 21307 Hawthorne Boulevard Suite 250 Torrance California 90503 308 North Curry Street Suite 205 Carson City Nevada 89703 Tel (702) 883 7867 Fax (702) 883 7398 Structural Engineers • Seismic Rehabilitation • Architectural Preservation • Materials Conservation Mr. Charlie Swartz March 29, 1994 Page 2 Seismic Safety Commission Report - To the best of my knowledge, this report has been submitted. However this should be verified from your records. Ordinance - The state legislature adopted Appendix Chapter 1 of the UCBC for the seismic retrofit programs for all cities affected by SB -547. This is the same as technical ordinance I submitted in my report. The city needs to adopt this with the administrative provisions to get the program going. I am suggesting a phased approach. Care must be taken in establishing a time line for completing a program. A program that is too fast may kill downtown either by having owners walk away from the buildings or by tearing up everything at once. I am suggesting a program that completes the work by about the year 2002. It would require parapet and wall anchors to be installed within a reasonable period but permit the remainder of the work to be completed over several years. The work schedule would be based on building occupant load. It may be necessary to develop a plan, such as a lottery, for the many smaller buildings so there is a reasonable schedule for construction. We will develop this as part of our work. I also want to schedule one or two public information meetings for building owners on the program and plan. Then the City Council can have a public hearing on the ordinance. I hope we can complete our work within the remaining funds of $3100. Keep in mind that was based on 1989 salaries rather than 1994. We need to watch the budget to be fair to both us and the city. I will be over soon to gather the files for our review. At that time I will have a draft time line for the ordinance for your review. Please call if there are any questions. Yours e vyn Green Structural Engineer ,g204, -(e x . April 13, 1994 Dear Property Owner: The California Legislature in 1986 adopted SB -547, the Unreinforced Masonry Law. This law required local jurisdictions to survey and identify all unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, to submit a summary of the survey to the Seismic Safety Commission and to develop a mitigation plan by notifying the building owner and other measures as deemed necessary by the City Council. In late 1989 and early 1990 the City of Hermosa conducted a survey to identify buildings of URM construction. After the survey the city sent a letter to each property owner of record informing them that their building was included in the preliminary survey. Owners were invited to submit to the Building Department any information that may show cause for the building to be removed from the list of URM buildings. A number of owners submitted information in response to the letter. The City Council reviewed a proposed mandatory seismic rehabilitation ordinance and decided to postpone adoption of a mandatory ordinance at that time. The intent was to permit economics to encourage owners to strengthening buildings. In the Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994, several URM buildings in Hermosa Beach suffered damage that, had the earthquake occurred during normal daylight hours, could have resulted in injury or death to people near the building. Buildings in communities, such as Los Angeles, that are well along in completing their strengthening programs had much less building damage than in previous earthquakes. In the zone of greatest shaking, no one died or was seriously injured from damage to URM buildings. This may be the first major earthquake in which there were no deaths from this type of construction. The City Council is aware of this record and has directed staff to prepare an ordinance to mandate seismic strengthening of unreinforced masonry bearing wall buildings. To assure community input and awareness of this program, the city is in the process of scheduling two public information meetings to be followed by a public hearing by the City Council. The suggested time schedule for completing the program is attached. The engineering provisions of the ordinance are mandated by state law and are similar to those of surrounding communities. As the listed owner of such a building this letter is to invite you to the information meetings which will be held on May 77, 1994 at 7:30 a.m. and on May 77, 1994 at 4:30 p.m.. The meetings will be held in the City Council Chambers in the City Hall. Each meeting should take no more than 1 hour. There will be ample time to answer any questions. At that time you will also be informed of the specific time of the public hearing on the proposed ordinance. We encourage you to attend the information meeting and the public hearing. If you have any specific questions you may call the Building Department at ??7 Yours truly, Charlie Swartz Building Inspector enc: um ltr 1 .sam April 13, 1994 Dear Property Owner: The California Legislature in 1986 adopted SB -547, the Unreinforced Masonry Law. This law required local jurisdictions to survey and identify all unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, to submit a summary of the survey to the Seismic Safety Commission and to develop a mitigation plan by notifying the building owner and other measures as deemed necessary by the City Council. In late 1989 and early 1990 the City of Hermosa conducted a survey to identify buildings of URM construction. Adler the survey the city sent a letter to each property owner of record informing them that their building was included in the preliminary survey. Owners were invited to submit to the Building Department any information that may show cause for the building to be removed from the list of URM buildings. A number of owners submitted information in response to the letter. The City Council reviewed a proposed mandatory seismic rehabilitation ordinance and decided to postpone adoption of a mandatory ordinance at that time. The intent was to permit economics to encourage owners to strengthening buildings. In the Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994, several URM buildings in Hermosa Beach suffered damage that, had the earthquake occurred during normal daylight hours, could have resulted in injury or death to people near the building. Buildings in communities, such as Los Angeles, that are well along in completing their strengthening programs had much less building damage than in previous earthquakes. In the zone of greatest shaking, no one died or was seriously injured from damage to URM buildings. This may be the first major earthquake in which there were no deaths from this type of construction. The City Council is aware of this record and has directed staff to prepare an ordinance to mandate seismic strengthening of unreinforced masonry bearing wall buildings. To assure community input and awareness of this program, the city is in the process of scheduling two public information meetings to be followed by a public hearing by the City Council. The suggested time schedule for completing the program is attached. The engineering provisions of the ordinance are mandated by state law and are similar to those of surrounding communities. As the listed owner of such a building this letter is to invite you to the information meetings which will be held on May 77, 1994 at 7:30 a.m. and on May 77, 1994 at 4:30 p.m.. The meetings will be held in the City Council Chambers in the City Hall. Each meeting should take no more than 1 hour. There will be ample time to answer any questions. At that time you will also be informed of the specific time of the public hearing on the proposed ordinance. We encourage you to attend the information meeting and the public hearing. If you have any specific questions you may call the Building Department at 7?? Yours truly, Charlie Swartz Building Inspector enc: urniltr l .sam • /Mzcr -rem X. April 13, 1994 Dear Property Owner: The California Legislature in 1986 adopted SB -547, the Unreinforced Masonry Law. This law required local jurisdictions to survey and identify all unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, to submit a summary of the survey to the Seismic Safety Commission and to develop a mitigation plan by notifying the building owner and other measures as deemed necessary by the City Council. In late 1989 and early 1990 the City of Hermosa conducted a survey to identify buildings of URM construction. After the survey the city sent a letter to each property owner of record informing them that their building was included in the preliminary survey. Owners were invited to submit to the Building Department any information that may show cause for the building to be removed from the list of URM buildings. A number of owners submitted information in response to the letter. The City Council reviewed a proposed mandatory seismic rehabilitation ordinance and decided to postpone adoption of a mandatory ordinance at that time. The intent was to permit economics to encourage owners to strengthening buildings. In the Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994, several URM buildings in Hermosa Beach suffered damage that, had the earthquake occurred during normal daylight hours, could have resulted in injury or death to people near the building. Buildings in communities, such as Los Angeles. that arc well along in completing their strengthening programs had much less building damage than in previous earthquakes. In the zone of greatest shaking, no one died or was seriously injured from damage to URM buildings. This may be the first major earthquake in which there were no deaths from this type of construction. The City Council is aware of this record and has directed staff to prepare an ordinance to mandate seismic strengthening of unrcinforced masonry bearing wall buildings. To assure community input and awareness of this program, the city is in the process of scheduling two public information meetings to be followed by a public hearing by the City Council. The suggested time schedule for completing the program is attached. The engineering provisions of the ordinance are mandated by state law and are similar to those of surrounding communities. As the listed owner of such a building this letter is to invite you to the information meetings which will be held on May 77, 1994 at 7:30 a.m. and on May 77, 1994 at 4:30 p.m.. The meetings will be held in the City Council Chambers in the City Hall. Each meeting should take no more than 1 hour. There will be ample time to answer any questions. At that time you will also be informed of the specific time of the public hearing on the proposed ordinance. We encourage you to attend the information meeting and the public hearing. If you have any specific questions you may call the Building Department at 777 Yours truly, Charlie Swartz Building Inspector enc: urmitr 1 .sam May 3, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 DOWNTOWN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: Approve the award of contract for the Downtown Implementation Plan to the firm IBI Group, in the amount of $120,000. Approve an appropriation of S105,000 from the Downtown Enhancement Commission (DEC) account and $15,000 from the In -lieu Parking account to pay for Improvement Plan consultant services. Background: In October 1992 the American Institute of Architects brought a R/UDAT Team to Hermosa Beach to study the downtown area. The comprehensive report that resulted from the intensive R/UDAT exercise reflects the general consensus of all those who participated: residents, business owners, politicians, their appointees and City staff. The R/UDAT study is specifically action oriented and proposes a series of achievable implementation actions necessary to take advantage of the opportunities the downtown area offers. In order to move forward with the implementation of the R/UDAT study the Downtown Enhancement Commission at their meeting of January 19, 1994 directed staff to seek City Council approval to develop a Scope of Work for the Downtown Area Improvement Plan. City Council at their meeting of February 22, 1994 directed staff to prepare a Scope of Work and a Request for Proposal (RFP) to be distributed to qualified consultants. RFP's were sent to 16 consulting firms and on March 29, 1994 seven proposals were received and opened. Proposals were reviewed by Councilwoman Julie Oakes, Downtown Enhancement Commissioner Dean Nota and members of the Public Works Department and Planning Department staff. All proposals were reviewed for compliance with the RFP, background experience, technical capabilities, and each firms past history. After careful review by the committee three firms were selected that best complied with the requested Scope of Work, they were: 8 1. Urban Design Studio, San Juan Capistrano, CA 2. Roma Design, San Francisco, CA 3. IBI Group, Irvine, CA These firms were then invited to give presentations before the Downtown Enhancement Commission at their April 20, 1994 meeting. Analysis: The three firms were given 30 minutes each to describe their qualifications and approach to the project. All three firms gave relevant presentations after which the D.E.C. critiqued them. It was the general consensus of the Commission that while all three firms have shown the expertise necessary to carry out the implementation of the R/UDAT study, IBI Group set themselves apart with their directed approach. IBI understands that the ultimate goal of this project is to provide the City with the necessary plans and specifications from which streetscape and roadway improvements along portions of Hermosa avenue and Pier Avenue may be constructed. Prior to the preparation of the final construction documents, IBI's design team will refine the urban design guidelines and streetscape concepts presented in the R/UDAT study. Part of this effort will involve testing the constructability of the R/UDAT design concepts, including an assessment of the infrastructure impacts of those designs. The R/UDAT study is an important document because its design concepts were the result of a dialogue between the business and residential communities. It is IBI Group's intention to continue this community outreach effort to ensure that the spirit of R/UDAT is implemented as envisioned. In addition, IBI in conjunction with Ernst and Young, will develop an economic strategy for the downtown area which will be aimed at improving the performance of existing businesses, identification of investment opportunities in the downtown area, improvement of the fiscal position of the City of Hermosa Beach over time, and an assessment of potential funding sources for construction of public improvements in the downtown area. Attached please find a copy of IBI Group's proposal. It is in this context that the D.E.C. and proposal review committee recommend award of the Downtown Implementation Plan contract to IBI Group. The Downtown Implementation Project represents a huge step in the renaissance of the City of Hermosa Beach. This project in concert with the pier renovation, utility undergrounding,Biltmore Park and Hermosa Avenue rehabilitation projects will begin to define a new Hermosa Beach, a vision of Hermosa that will last well into the next century. Funding: The cost to provide the Downtown Implementation Plan per IBI Group's proposal is $120,000.00. The available balance of the Downtown Enhancement fund is $440,219.00, with $120,000.00 of this set aside for in -lieu parking. A portion of the in -lieu moneys could be put towards the Implementation Plan Parking Study. The breakdown for this item of work is $15,000.00. Fiscal Impact: Retaining a consultant to prepare the Downtown Implementation Plan will reduce the available balance in the Downtown Enhancement Fund by $120,000.00 to $320,219.00, $105,000.00 of which will remain set aside for in -lieu parking. Attachment Respectfully submitted: Concur: Cz l 1. ' ►r4 \.I, ka Joseph C. Mankawich - Amy Aniirani Capital Improvement Program Engineer Director of Public Works Noted for Fiscal Impact: 64LetiaLtiAti Viki Copeland Finance Director cc/a/downtown • / Stephen R. Burrell City Manager • 4 , $4.-171wwvaiR,TPVFAIN,„,. , ..errivwimr4 . • 11, • :""615441.;.4 111; March 29, 1994 Ms. Amy Amirani Director, Public Works City of Hermosa Beach Civic Center 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3885 Dear Ms. Amirani: Downtown Improvement Project Thank you for the opportunity to present a proposal to conduct the final phase of planning and design for downtown Hermosa Beach. IBI Group, in association with Roger McErlane and Associates and AICvI Consulting Engineers, is pleased to provide a detailed work program to accomplish the Scope of Work described in your Request For Proposals dated March 7, 1994. We are proposing to conduct all portions of the work described with the exception of the Economic Development Strategy Task. As a team, we stand ready to devote our creative energies to the tasks at hand: • Refining the excellent concepts put forward recently by R/UDAT; • Preparing plans to allow for the implementation of the RJUDAT team's recommendations. We will assign a seasoned staff of architects, urban designers, landscape architects and engineers to accomplish the City's goals. We look forward to an opportunity to present our qualifications and approach during the interview phase of consultant selection. Yours very truly, IBI GROUP Alistair Baillie Director AB/km Enclosures City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project 1.0 INTRODUCTION When the American Institute of Architects completed its R/UDAT study recently, the City moved one giant step closer to its goal of rejuvenating Downtown Hermosa Beach. The R/UDAT study was conducted by a team of professionals representing a broad range of design disciplines and with experience in many different parts of the country. The expert team studied Hermosa Beach and its environs, consulted with City staff, and conducted a dialogue with the business and residential community about their vision and goals for the downtown area. Finally, the design team spent hours working among themselves to arrive at a list of recommended actions for the City to follow in implementing the community's vision for Downtown Hermosa Beach. The City is now prepared to begin implementing the R/UDAT team's recommendations by constructing the improvements which will spark the revitalization of downtown. UNDERSTANDING We understand the ultimate goal of this project is to provide the City with AND APPROACH the necessary plans and specifications from which streetscape and roadway improvements, along portions of Hermosa Avenue and Pier Avenue South, may be constructed. TEAM MAKE-UP Prior to preparing final construction documents, the design team will refine the Urban Design guidelines and streetscape concepts presented in the R/UDAT study. Part of this effort will involve testing the constructability of the R/UDAT design concepts, including an assessment of the infrastructure impacts of those designs. The R/UDAT design concepts were the result of a dialogue with the business and residential community. It is our intention to continue this community outreach effort to ensure that the spirit of R/UDAT is implemented as envisioned. IBI Group has formed a highly qualified team with Roger McErlane and Associates and AKM Consulting Engineers. The organization chart, Exhibit 1, shows how the team will function in relation to City staff and among each other to accomplish the work program. Mr. Alistair Baillie, Director of IBI Group, will serve as Principal -in - Charge for the project's duration. Mr. Baillie's specialty is parking needs assessment and in addition to assuring quality control over all project products, he will prepare the Parking Needs Assessment described in the .1 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project work program. Mr. Paul Zajfen, a Director of IBI Group and Architect is responsible for the firm's design practice in the United States. Mr. Zajfen has completed urban design studies for the City of Santa Ma, Hollywood Boulevard Walk of Fame and a Master Plan for the historic downtown of the City of San Juan Capistrano. Other major urban design work includes reuse of the rail lands at Mission Bay, San Francisco, and Union Station in San Diego. His work consistently receives AIA Honor Awards for excellence in design. Mr. Zajfen will be responsible for all urban design studies, design guidelines, and development guidelines for the study. Mr. Roger McErlane, a licensed Landscape Architect and Urban Designer with over 25 years of experience, will be responsible for all landscape and streetscape aspects of the project. Mr. McErlane's experience with projects of similar scale and complexity in mature California communities, will make his Urban Design input invaluable. Mr. Alan Rubin, will serve as Project Manager and be responsible for the day-to-day coordination of the work effort. Mr. Rubin's recent experience with revitalization projects in Santa Ana and Anaheim, plus his extensive project management experience in both planning and landscape architecture, will mean effective and efficient accomplishment of the project's goals. Mr. Jaime Moreno, Principal of AKM, experience encompasses a wide range of civil engineering projects. These include all facets of engineering planning, design, management and follow up construction support for a variety of projects including water facilities, wastewater facilities, transportation improvements and water resource projects. .2 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Exhibit 1: Team Organization Residential Community City Council Downtown Commission Amy Amirani, P.E. Public Works Director IBI Group Alistair Baillie Principal -in -Charge Alan Rubin Project Manager Business Community P. Zajfen, IBI A. Rubin, IBI W. Longyear, IBI R. McErlane, RMA A. Baillie, IBI G. Tate, 181 A. Rubin, 181 IBI = IBI Group E & Y = Emst & Young R. McErlane, RMA J. Moreno, AKM M. Rowther, AKM F. Pretsch, IBI R. Grimes, IBI C. Altmayer, E & Y RMA = Roger McErlane & Associates AKM = AKM Consulting Engineers City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK We present the following detailed work plan for all Tasks described in the Requests for Proposal, with the exception of the Economic Development Strategy Task 2.1 URBAN DESIGN 2.1.1 We will conduct a site review and assessment of existing conditions AND PARKING STUDY with staff. Engineering base information will be gathered and data needs for the study will be assessed in detail. The City will provide the following base information to IBI Group: • RIUDAT original maps and exhibits; • Land ownership records (assessor rer;ords); • Assessor land and improvements value listings; • General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements (text, graphics and background data). • Parking studies completed by the City and/or Consultants; • Sales tax receipt information (State Board of Equalization) for downtown businesses including current year and available historic data; Pier competition winning design; Recent Strand improvements as -buil,. drawings; Planning Department development applications log for downtown; Utilities maps for downtown (above and below - ground); • Digital base map for engineering design - City's format (AutoCAD); • Any archival aerial photographs available (oblique and/or vertical); • Downtown traffic studies and traffic counts; • Improvement plans for streets, storm drains, sewer and water; • Master Plans for sewer, water and drainage; • Survey controls and preliminary design for adjacent Hermosa Avenue street improvement project. We will review existing street improvements, drainage. utilities. and all other conditions which may constrain development. 2.1.2 We will review the RjUDAT study recommendations and City goals with staff. To receive input from the business and residential community we will conduct an open workshop (June 11) at a location to be determined. The goal of this workshop will be to ensure that the R/UDAT recommendations to be implemented are fully understood by the community and the City leaders. .3 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project 2.1.3 We will prepare urban design studies addressing: • gateways and focal points; • architectural massing and height; • facade and street elevation design character; • hardscape and landscape treatments; • street lighting and furniture alternatives; • signing guidelines; • overall thematic character and urban design principles; • review of cost and budget alternatives. 2.1.4 We will coordinate the design concepts with all engineering requirements to assure constructability of the recommended designs. These will include parking layout, vehicular traffic lanes, emergency access, storm drainage, and utilities. 2.1.5 We will prepare a conceptual cost estimate of the design concepts including streetscape improvements and street improvements. 2.1.6 We will conduct a second community workshop (June 29) to receive input on the design concepts. Following this workshop we will present the selected design to the Downtown Commission (July 6) prior to preparation of final design plans. 2.1.7 We will refine the concepts and prepare final design plans, including sections, details, blow-ups, and a conceptual cost estimate for all improvements. 2.1.8 We will prepare a parking needs study for the Downtown area. This study will include detailed supply and demand characteristics based on historical data and projected buildout conditions. The need for additional parking spaces, both on -street and in parking structures, will be assessed and a timetable for provision of any new spaces will be provided. The Urban Design implications of structured parking will also be assessed. • Two (2) team meetings; • Streetscape Design; • Gateway and Focal Points Design; • Parking Study; • Urban Design and Signage Guidelines; • Two (2) community workshops; • Two (2) public meetings (Downtown Commission [1] and City Council [1]). .4 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project GO xevonsTha ate: • Attend two (2) team meeting. • Attend one (1) Downtown Commission Meeting; • Attend one (1) City Council Meeting; • Make arrangements for two (2) community workshops; • Arrange for presentations to the Downtown Commission (1) and the City Council (1). • Review reports. Task Duration: Ten (10) weeks. .5 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project 2.2 INFRASTRUCTURE Research and Data Collection IMPACT ANALYSIS 2.2.1 Primary Contacts: Make initial contact with City's Public Works and other agency staff. Establish clear lines of communication. 2.2.2 Collect and Research Data: Collect and review all available reports, studies, master plans, as -built drawings and other data related to existing and planned infrastructure in the area including sewer, water, streets and flood control facilities. All available data and information from the sewer master plan study, that is presently in process, will be utilized to the maximum extent possible. 2.2.3 Infrastructure Inventory: Detailed inventory of backbone infrastructure facilities will be prepared. This will include all existing facilities within or providing service to the study area. 2.2.4 Regulatory Setting and Design Criteria: The purpose of this effort will be to determine the responsible agencies, service area boundaries, institutional constraints and regulatory setting for the infrastructures. Key design criteria for all major facilities will also be summarized. Analysis and Evaluation 2.2.5 Infrastructure Analysis: In close coordination with and based on the recommendations resulting from the Urban Design element and other planning studies included in Tasks 1 and 2, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the existing infrastructure facilities will be conducted. Analysis will include the development of incremental demands and identification of deficiencies in the existing systems. 2.2.6 Alternative Evaluations: Alternative solutions for identified deficiencies will be developed and evaluated. Findings will be discussed with the City and effected agency staff. Feasibility of alternative solutions will be evaluated based on factors including cost-effectiveness, constructability, traffic impacts, public safety, utility impact and other constraints. Most viable solutions will be recommended for implementation in a draft report. 2.2.7 Draft Report: Findings, results and conclusions of the study will be compiled in a draft report. Five copies of the draft report will be submitted to the City for review and distribution to effected agencies. Report Finalization .6 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project (Sty Responsibilities: Task Duration: 2.2.8 Incorporate comments: All comments and input received in response to the draft report submittal will be incorporated into the study. Refinements to the selected alternative solutions and cost estimates will be made, as necessary. • One (1) team meeting; • Final Report - one reproducible (in digital hard copy format) and ten copies of the Final Infrastructure Impact Report; • Draft Report. Attend one (1) team meeting; Review Draft and Final Reports. Five (5) weeks. .7 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project 23 STREETSCAPE We will prepare landscape and engineering construction documents IMPROVEMENTS AND including plans at 1" = 20' and blow ups at 1" = 8' for all hardscape, ENGINEERING landscape and irrigation elements. Details will include street furniture, benches, waste receptacles and bollards, and light fixtures. Engineering elements are described in detail below. Field Survey and Base -mapping 2.3.1 Field Survey: Field survey will be accomplished to the level of detail necessary to provide accurate base -maps and locations of all existing improvements and utilities including manholes, cleanouts, utility vaults, valve boxes, power/light poles, drain inlets, utility panels and appurtenances. The survey will be based on the same controls and benchmarks used for the preparation of the construction documents for Hermosa Avenue from Herondo to Pier Avenue, thereby facilitating the coordination between the two projects. All street monuments will be identified and tied for reset if disturbed during construction. 2.3.2 Base -map Preparation: An electronic data base will be provided by the City in AutoCad Version 12 format. Preliminary Design 2.3.3 Preliminary Street Improvement Plans: Preliminary Street Improvement drawings on standard 40 -Scale plans and profiles sheets will be developed for Hermosa Avenue, from Pier Avenue to 15th Court, and for Pier Avenue, from Hermosa to Strand. Design will incorporate recommendations from the Parking Study, Urban Design plan, and Streetscape Design plan, resulting from Task 1. 2.3.4 Signing and Striping Plans: Sign plan and Pavement Delineation plans in 40 -Scale will prepared in conformance with the Parking Study and Sign Program, resulting from Task 1. 2.3.5 Preliminary Estimates: Quantity take -offs., and Preliminary Engineer's Estimate will be prepared. 2.3.6 Utility/Agency Review: Two sets of preliminary drawings will be submitted to all utility companies and agencies that have facilities that are impacted or are in the vicinity of the project construction. 2.3.7 Preliminary Submittal: Three sets of preliminary Street Improvement, Sign and Pavement Delineation plan, along with the Engineer's Estimate will be submitted to the City for review and .8 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project comments. Final Design 2.3.8 Final Design: Plans will be revised to incorporate all comments received for the City and utility agencies. The design will be finalized including any non-standard and special details that may be required. 2.3.9 Stage Construction and Traffic Control Plans: The Stage Construction and Traffic Control Plans will identify the sequences of work, work areas and construction traffic requirements, and will be based on Caltran's Traffic Manual and the WATCH Manual. Construction Schedule reflecting schedule and timeframes for street/lane closures will also be developed and incorporated into the construction documents. 2.3.10 Specifications: Construction Specifications will be prepared in a format specified by the City. City's boiler -plate provisions will be used for the General Provisions and Special Provisions to the maximum extent possible. Additional Special and Technical provisions will be included, as needed. 2.3.11 Final Engineer's Estimate: Quantity take -offs and cost estimates will be revised to reflect the final design. 2.3.12 Final Utility/Agency Review: Two sets of final drawings and one set of draft specifications will be submitted to all impacted utility companies and agencies for final comments. Meetings to discuss relocation work and schedule will also be initiated. 2.3.13 Final Submittal: Three sets of final Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) will be submitted to the City of final comments. .9 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project City Responsibilities: Final Construction Documents All comments on the final PS&E will be incorporated into the final Construction Document package. The submittal will include one reproducible and ten bluelines (along with digital data in AutoCad format) set of plans consisting of the following sheets: Title Sheet 1 Detail Blow-ups 1 Planting Plans 4 Street Improvement Plans 2 Signs Plan 1 Pavement Delineation Plans 2 Stage Construction and Traffic Control Plans 2 Detail Sheets 2 Total sheets 15 We will provide construction observation services at the request of City staff. The cost of this effort is not included in the budget. • One (1) City Council meeting; • One (1) Downtown Commission meeting; • Complete engineering and landscape architecture design plans, specifications and construction documents for Hermosa Avenue (Pier to 15th Court) and Pier Avenue (Hermosa to Strand); • Two (2) Team meetings. • Attend two (2) Team meetings; • Review Construction Documents; • Attend Downtown Commission and City Council meetings — prepare Staff reports. Task Duration Eight (8) weeks. .10 City of Ilermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project 2.4 MARKET The economic development strategy will be aimed at achieving the ANALYSIS AND FISCAL following: IMPACT STUDY • A set of strategies to improve the performance of existing businesses. • Identification of opportunities for investment in the downtown area. • A strategy to improve the fiscal position of the City of Hermosa Beach over time. • An assessment of potential funding sources for construction of public improvements in the downtown area. To accomplish these goals we will: 2.4.1 Analysis of Demographic Conditions: Businesses in downtown Hermosa Beach serve both the resident and visitor markets. As the demographic characteristics of these markets change, the business opportunities also change. Significant changes in the demographic characteristics of Hermosa Beach will be analyzed. These characteristics will include age, household income, family size, residential construction activity, retail purchasing characteristics and employment. 2.4.2 Forecast of Future Conditions: IBI Group will forecast trade area population, household composition and income characteristics through 2005 to identify the economic forces which will drive future business and investment opportunities in downtown Hermosa Beach. 2.4.3 Downtown Business Needs: IBI Group will design a survey instrument for distribution to all downtown businesses and property owners. This survey will identify the opportunities and constraints of doing business in downtown Hermosa Beach, investigate the corrective actions needed, identify other businesses or services which would complement and strengthen the business climate in the downtown area, and evaluate a range of possible short and long-term improvement strategies. The survey instrument will be self-administered, and IBI Group will tabulate and analyze the survey results. .11 ry=e —C —1 994 14:00= 181 GROUP 711 833 5511 P.03/04 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project 2.4.4 Market Study: IBI Group will prepare a market study for each of the following uses, considering future demand growth from both resident and visitor markets, existing and emerging competition, development or renovation opportunities within the downtown, and the proposed urban design and streetscape improvements: • Retail or service businesses; • Hotels; • Apartments or condominiums. The market analysis will identify the potential for private sector development projects in the downtown area. 2.4.5 Evaluation of Public Investment Projects or Actions: Ernst & Young will compare the projected costs of public streetscape, infrastructure and parking improvements with both the broad economic benefits and the narrow City fiscal benefits over a twenty-year time horizon. The key variables which will be used in this analysis are as follows: • Construction cost; • Financing cost; • Maintenance cost; • Direct and indirect retail sales increase; • Sales tax increase; • Transient occupancy taxes; Property taxes; Impact on local business performance; Ability to induce new private investment. 2.4.6 Recommended Economic Development Projects and Strategies: On the basis of the fiscal analysis above, actions and projects deemed most critical to achieving economic development objectives and private investment will be identified. 2.4.7 Financial Plan and Impact Analysis Ernst & Young will prepare a high-level financial plan to support the projected infrastructure improvements in the downtown area of the City of Hermosa Beach. This plan will address: • Funding options; .12 . I;1A', -0=-1994 14:n4 IBI GROUP 714 _ _ ; 5511 P.04/04 City or Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project • Funding sources from City, Regional, State and/or Federal sources; • Potential to establish a dedicated funding source; • Financing options, including determining ability of the City to support debt. This financial analysis will result in a high-level funding strategy. It will identify a likely funding scenario and the actions necessary for the City to support the funding analysis. As part of developing the funding strategy, Ernst & Young will evaluate the potential overall financial impact on the City of Hermosa Beach. Based on experiences of similar cities in making comparable infrastructure improvements, Ernst & Young will estimate a potential impact on the City of Hermosa related to: • Sales tax increases • Reductions in variances • Impact on local business performance • Property value increases. Our analysis and funding strategy will be compiled in a technical report and presented to the Project Steering Committee. Staff will be available for subsequent presentations to the business community on a time and materials basis. .13 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project 3.0 SCIiEDULE Exhibit 2 (revised) shows a twenty (20) week schedule for completion of the Downtown Improvement Project. This assumes that IBI Group will coordinate with the ongoing Economic Development Strategy effort by other consultants. .14 City of Hermosa Beach Downtown Improvement Project 4.0 COSTS Exhibit 3 shows a breakdown of costs by Task, including hours and dollars. We propose to complete the work program for a lump sum amount of $120,000, broken down as follows: Task 2.1 Urban Design and Parking Task 2.2 Infrastructure Impact Analysis Task 2.3 Engineering and Streetscape Improvements Task 2.4 Market Analysis & Fiscal Impact Study $45,000 $10,500 $38,600 $25,900 Reimbursable expenses of $8,200 are included in the total (see Exhibit 3). _15 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Exhibit 2: Proposed Schedule MONTH MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER WEEKS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DATE (Monday) 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 4 11 18 2.5 1 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 TASK Task 2.1 Urban Design & Parking `'. :'i..•.';- ', .- Task 2.2 Wrastructure lmpoct Analysis Task 2.3 Engineering & Slreetscape Improvements ' •' • Market Analysis & Fiscal Task 2.4 Impact Study 'i' t *;'= i. *<• MEETINGS Team Meering ■ Stakeholder's Meering 0 Downtown Commission 0 City Council • Draft Report • Find Report • ■ O ■ 0 ■ O • • • • ■ O 0 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Exhibit 3: Proposed Budget TASK IBI RMA AKM E & Y REIMS. TOTALS Hogs S Hours S Hours S Hours S S Tool Hours Tool S Task 2.1 Urban Design S Parking 325 527.500 120 S11.500 16 S I,0) SO SO $5.000 461 545,000 Task 2.2 Infrastructure Impact Analysis 16 $500 0 SO 120 50.500 SO SO $500 136 $10,500 Task 2.3 Ergineerirg S Stroetscope Imam emenC 132 59.500 40 52.800 300 S24,000 SO SO $2,300 472 538,600 Task 2.4 Market Analysis S Fiscal Impost Study 200 $17,000 0 SO 0 SO 40 58.500 5400 240 $25,400 Tool Hours by Firm 673 160 436 40 1,309 Tool Dolbn by Fiim $54.5C0 514.300 534,500 58,500 $8,200 $120.0) TOTALS 673 S54,300 160 514400 436 534,300 40 58,500 58.200 1,309 $120,000 f81-181 GROUP RMA - RCGER MCERIANE ASSOCIATES AKM - AKM CCNSUITING ENGINEERS ESY-ERNST&YOUNG CONFLICT OF INTEREST GUIDELINES APPLIES TO: Any elected or appointed City official and any city employee. If, in the course of their work or personal employment, said official should wish to take part in any project or employment within the limitc of lli_ !!10 n Beach from which they would draw direct financial advantage and would potentially come for consideration before their commission, they 'ould be compelled to: A. Notify the City Manager, in writing, of such potential conflict, deieiiiug_ the nature of the project, the scope of the official's involvement, and the amount of financial benefit involved. This notification should also state the official's intention regarding disqualifying themselves from any deliberation or discussion related to the project in question. B. Notify their appropriate board, in writing, of said conflict, stating the nature of the project, the scope of involvement, and amount of potential financial benefit. This notification should also state the official's inteutiou regarding disqualifying themselves from anv deliberation or discussion related to the project in question. C. Such notification should be delivered a minimum of 14 days prior to the commencement of any work on said project or at the first meeting of the affected commission prior to the commencement of any work on said projcct, whichcvcr is longcr. The City Manager will forward copies of said notification to the City Attorney and the City Council. The City Attorney will rule as to anv potential Conflict of Interest. Final appeal of any decision may be made directly to the Political Fair Practices Committee. Failure to ide by the decisions of the City Attorney (or Political Fair Practices ommission) may result in penalties including, but not Iimitcd to, Censure or Removal from the affected Commission, at the discretion of the City Council. In the case of City Employees, penalties may extend to termination, at the discretion of the City Manager. ITEM #9: POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST/INCOMPATIBLE ACTIVITIES OF CITY OFFICIALS THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 26, 1994. PLEASE REFER TO ITEM #13 OF THE APRIL 26, 1994 AGENDA PACKET TO REVIEW STAFF REPORT. May 5, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994 REQUEST TO OBTAIN AN OPINION ON THE ISSUE OF VESTING CONCERNING 1'HE OIL PROJECT RELATIVE TO THE INITIATIVE Recommendation That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the City Agreement with the law firm of Richards, Watson and Gershon to provide legal services in connection with the oil project. Background The City has an agreement with the firm of Richards, Watson and Gershon to provide special legal services on a project -by -project basis. The City has a need to have specialized legal service in order to obtain an opinion on issues related to the oil project lease that is subject to an initiative measure now being circulated, as well as other issues related to the lease, Coast Commission review process and any potential conflicts of interest. The 1993-94 Budget contains sufficient funds to cover the cost of this work. However, should the research take longer or becomes more complicated, I will return for a specific allocation. Respectfully sub ' ed, il Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 1 0 ITEM #11: PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROHIBITING DOGS ON ACTIVE SCHOOL GROUNDS IN THE CITY THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 26, 1994. PLEASE REFER TO ITEM #11 OF THE APRIL 26, 1994 AGENDA PACKET TO REVIEW STAFF REPORT. May 5, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of Regular Meeting of the Hermosa Beach City Council May 10, 1994 REQUEST OF THE SOUTH BAY ALANO CLUB TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY AND BUILDING LOCATED AT 702 - 11TH PLACE Recommendation That the City Council determine whether or not it is interested in considering the request. Background I have attached a letter from Timothy H. Meadows on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Alano Club requesting that the City Council consider selling the land and building that they now use under a lease from the City. Their request includes information on property they consider to be comparable. The proposal is a $300,000 purchase price with $150,000 down payment with a 30 - year full amortized mortgage of $150,000 at 10% per year which will result in a monthly payment of $1316.38. The Club made a similar request in 1991 and, because of the possible use of the land area for a temporary City Yard, no action was taken pending a decision on the yard relocation. The area would not be suitable for a temporary city yard primarily due to the conflict of surrounding uses. There may be other uses, however. The property was purchased with funds from the Parking District. The rent that is paid by the Alano Club is placed into the Parking Fund. The present annual rent is $17,325. If the City Council is interested in pursuing this request, the following steps would need to be taken. 1. Determination that the property is no longer needed by the City. 2. Determination on the use of proceeds if the sale is approved. (Downtown _ Enhancement Commission should provide a recommendation) 3. Appraisal of the property to determine the fair market value. 4. Direction to staff to prepare necessary documents to effect the sale. Respectfully submitted, Stephen ' . Burrell City Manager April 13, 1994 To the City Council of Hermosa Beach: We, of the South Bay Alano Club, represented by our Board of Directors and our Trustees, would like to purchase the property located at 702 llth Place, Hermosa Beach as our permanent club home. We propose a_purchase price of $300,000 paid as follows: $150,000 downpayment with the balance of $150,000 financed by the City of Hermosa Beach at 10% fixed interest rate, fully amortized over 30 years with a payment of approximately $1316.38 per month. We base this proposed purchase price on a lot size of approximately 6000 square feet, a building that has little commercial value and recent sales of commercially zoned property in the beach cities. The purchase price does not include the parking lot to the east of the building. We believe that the sale of this property would be in the best interest of the City of Hermosa Beach because it would guarantee continued use by the South Bay Alano Club for AA and Alanon meetings and it would be in keeping with the civic service use of land in the immediate area.. Thank you for your consideration. C1)\ --L, /.) 1300 AVIATION BL 1901 PACIFIC COAST H 1209 N SEPULVEDA BL Status City Area # Thomas Guide # Type # Units # Buildings List Price Sale Price List Date Begin of Escrow End Date ADOM Totl Bldg Sqft $/SQFT Terms Land Sqft Land Dim Bldg Age Office Sqft Grs Sched Inc Vacancy Allow % Vacancy Allow $ Grs Oper Inc Operating Exp % Operating Exp $ Net Oper Inc Loan Payment Grs Spend Inc Cap Rate Grs Multiplier Construction Zoning Feature Feature Feature Feature Feature Feature Feature Feature Feature Feature ACTIVE 1..ksT\ivG *RB 54 762J2 OFC 2 269000 02/28/94 46 1100 CTEL 2178 34 0 0 0 .00 FRAME C GENERAL OFFICE GIFT/FLORIST PROFESSIONAL OF RETAIL SO LV) *HB 49 762G1 C 2 299000 278000 02/17/93 07/06/93 07/30/93 139 1700 CTNL 4725 45X105 99 FRAME R3 SW -0 *MB 43 *732G6 OTH 345000 285000 08/01/93 11/01/93 12/23/93 207 361 38.50 CASH 8960 40X224 40 340 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00 FRAME GSBRM COMMERCIAL -INDUSTRIAL AP# 4161013004 Have CORNER FREE STANDNG Addr 1300 AVIATION BL XSts STANFORD AVE GO/GI/PO/RT/ / / / / / RETAIL / l Status A #Images 1 04/14/94 12:51 PM.- PropType OFC Pr $ 269000 City *RB Area 54 TG 762J2 $/SF $ County LA St CA Zp 90278 Loans $ 50000 Total Bldg Sqft 1100 Gross Equity$ GENERAL OFFICE /GIFT/FLORIST /PROFESSIONAL OF / Terms CTEL/CTNL/ / / / Poss IMMED Remarks VACANT.PRIME CORNER. HIGH IDENTITY. PROFESS. OR RETAIL USE. GREAT CURB APPEAL. IDEAL OWNER/USER. LIGHT & BRIGHT. 2 OPEN SUITES EACH WITH BATHROOM & WETBAR & SEPARATE ENTRANCE. FINANCIAL Gross Sched Income Vacancy Allow % Gross Oper Income Operating Exp % Net Oper Income Loan Payment Gross Spend Income Cap Rate Gross Multiplier Unit Size No Tenant VACANT 0 0 0 .00 LEASE Sqft Type Lg Exp 1100 Total Base Income $ Overage Income $ Tot Mo Gross Sched Income $ ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES Taxes (New) $ Elevator $ Fire Ins Liability Ins Gas & Elect Water Maint % Management Gardener _ Pkg Lots Trash Janitor - Association ANALYSIS (ANNUAL) Tax Area Tax Rate Yr Land $ Imprvmnts $ Per Prop $ Total $ Legal: Lot# Rent / Mo. /MO /MO 0/MO Tax Rate 8 Blk# 3 Tract# 4 ---- FINANCIAL INFO AS OF 1st $ 50000 @ $ /MO @ Due Lender Assumable Type Fee 2nd $ @ $ /MO @ Fin Remrks Land FEE Lse $ / YrExp Zones: Spc Std N Fld N Cstl N Sld N Bldg Dim Land Sqft Const FRAME/ Fire Spk N Stories Bldg Prmt Sewer ICP Mezz Sqft 2178 Land Dim Roof CR/ R/Age 10 Min Clear Ht Span Bldg Age 34 Yr Rfb 1983 Zn C #Bldg 2 #Un _ Stg Tnk N 0/Head Crane N PLANT DATA Power: /Amp /Volt Rail Heat / Ldng Drs #Dck #Toilets: M/ W/ Pkg Spc Ratio Cooling #Well #Grd Foil Skylt Fncd Sqft Tot Sqft #Offices _ Total $ 0 #Toilets: M/ W/ A/C N Heat WG/ OFFICE INFORMATION LD 02/28/94 ADOM 46 (c) MLS Information Deemed Reliable But Not Guaranteed GSBRM COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL AP# Have MIXED USAGE Addr 1901 PACIFIC COAST HY XSts / / / / / / / / / / Remarks PROPERTY ZONED R3 USE.SHOP DOWNSTAIRS & Gross Sched Income Vacancy Allow Gross Oper Income Operating Exp % Net Oper Income Loan Payment Gross Spend Income Cap Rate Gross Multiplier Unit Size No Tenant OW VAC Status SO #Images 1 PropType C City *HB Area 49 TG County LA St Zp Total Bldg Sqft 1700 Terms 04/14/94 12:51 PM Pr $ 299000 762G1 S/SF $ Loans $ Gross Equity$ CTNL/OMC / / / / Poss COE CHECK WITH CITY FOR USE.BEING SOLD AS IS. MIXED 2 BR UP.AGENT RELATED TO SELLER. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (ANNUAL) Tax Area Tax Rate Yr Land $ Imprvmnts $ Per Prop $ Total $ Legal: Lot# LEASE Sqft Type Lg Exp Total Base Overage Tot Mo Gross Sched ANNUAL Taxes (New) $ Fire Ins Liability Ins Gas & Elect Water Maint % 0 Management Income $ Income $ Income $ OPERATING EXPENSES Elevator $ Gardener Pkg Lots Trash Janitor Association Total $ LD 02/17/93 ADOM 139 Tax Rate Blk# Tract# Rent ---- FINANCIAL INFO AS OF / Mo. 1st $ 37000 @ $ 350/MO @ 10.000 /MO /MO /MO Due Assumable 2nd $ Fin Remrks Lender NEWPORT Type OT Fee @ $ /MO @ Land Lse $ Zones: Spc Std Bldg Dim Land Sqft Const FRAME/ Fire Spk Stories T Bldg Prmt Sewer / YrExp Fld Cstl Sld Mezz Sqft 4725 Land Dim 45X105 Roof OT/ R/Age Min Clear Ht Span Bldg Age 99 Yr Rfb Zn R3 #Bldg #Un 2 Stg Tnk O/Head Crane PLANT DATA Power: /Amp Rail Heat Ldng Drs #Dck #Toilets: M/ W/ Pkg Spc 2 Ratio Tot Sqft #Toilets: M/ OFFICE INFORMATION W/ /Volt Cooling #Well #Grd Foil Skylt Fncd Sqft #Offices A/C N Heat / OFF MARKET & COMP INFORMATION Off -Market 07/06/93 COE 07/30/93 Sold Terms Fin PRIV/ (C) MLS Information Deemed Reliable But Not Guaranteed Sale Price $ 278000 Sold Cap Rate WILSON REALTY 545-5655 04/14/94 TRISH FORBES GSBRM COMMERCIAL -INDUSTRIAL Status SO AP# 4170-007-015 Have City *MB Addr * 1209*N*SEPULVEDA BL County LA XSts MAN BCH BLVD Total Bldg / / / / / / / / / / / / Terms Remarks 2 LOTS, 40 X 112 EACH, SMALL BLDG ON SEPULVEDA IN MANHATTAN. RARE OPPORTUNITY TO BUILD OR HOLD FOR FUTURE. CONTACT AGENT FOR ADD'L INFO RE TYPES OF USES & POSSIBLE PROJECTS. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (ANNUAL) #Images 1 04/14/94 12:51 PM PropType OTH Pr $ 345000 Area 43 TG *732G6 S/SF $ 38.50 St CA Zp *90266 Loans $ 0 Sqft 361 Gross Equity$ 345000 / / / / CASH/CTNL/OMC2/ / / Poss COE Gross Sched Income Vacancy Allow % Gross Oper Income Operating Exp % Net Oper Income Loan Payment Gross Spend Income Cap Rate Gross Multiplier Unit Size L E A No Tenant Sqft Type Lg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00 Total Base Overage Tot Mo Gross Sched ANNUAL Taxes (New) $ Fire Ins Liability Ins Gas & Elect Water Maint % 0 Management Tax Area Tax Rate Yr Land $ Imprvmnts $ Per Prop $ Total $ Legal: Lot# 92/93 Tax Rate .10 345000 0 0 345000 21 Blk# 59 Tract# 1638 S E Rent ---- FINANCIAL INFO AS OF Exp / Mo. 1st $ Due Assumable 2nd $ Fin Remrks Income $ Income $ Income $ OPERATING EXPENSES 4100 Elevator $ Gardener 500 Pkg Lots Trash Janitor Association LD 08/01/93 ADOM 207 /MO /MO 0/MO @ $ /MO @ Lender Type Fee @ $ /MO @ Land FEE Lse $ 0/ YrExp Zones: Spc Std Fld Cstl Sld Bldg Dim 340 Land Sqft Const FRAME/ Fire Spk Stories 0 Bldg Prmt Sewer Power: Rail Ldng Drs #Toilets: Pkg Spc Tot Sqft Total $ 4600 #Toilets: OFFICE INFORMATION Mezz Sqft 8960 Land Dim 40X224 Roof AS/ R/Age Min Clear Ht Span Bldg Age 40 Yr Rfb Zn #Bldg #Un Stg Tnk 0/Head Crane PLANT DATA /Amp /Volt Heat / #Dck M/ W/ Ratio Cooling #Well #Grd Foil Skylt Fncd Sqft 0 340 #Offices 1 M/ 1 W/ A/C Heat WG/ OFF MARKET & COMP INFORMATION Off -Market 11/01/93 COE 12/23/93 Sold Terms STND Fin OTHR/ Sold Cap Rate .00 (C) MLS Information Deemed Reliable But Not Guaranteed Sale Price $ 285000 1 May 5, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994 AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE Recommendation Review the intent of proposed changes to the sign ordinance and provide direction to staff. Background The City Council and Planning Commission have been reviewing three aspects of the sign ordinance: 1) historical signs; 2) temporary signs, including grand openings, and; 3) window signs. The City Council reviewed the proposed changes in some detail and sent the entire ordinance back to the Planning Commission for its review. This ordinance will be on your agenda for the May 24, 1994 meeting. The City Council on February 8, 1994 directed that enforcement of flags be held until the ordinance was reviewed and a decision made as to whether or not there would be a change in the flag, pennant, etc. prohibition that exists in the present ordinance. This was in response to a letter by a Pier Avenue business that features flags on the outside of its building. The proposed ordinance continues to prohibit flags on a permanent basis. They could be allowed as part of a "grand opening" permit, but only for sixty (60) days. The temporary use of flags by an established business for a promotional activity or special event is not addressed in the ordinance. This may be something that the City Council may wish to consider including. I have had a few requests for temporary banners, flags, etc. during the past week. The requests seem to revolve around special events or special promotions that are either taking place in the region, company sales, or product introductions. Respectfully submitted, Stephen R. Burrell City Manager 13a